Image Title

Search Results for Iran:

Rhonda Crate, Boeing | WiDS 2023


 

(gentle music) >> Hey! Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of WiDS 2023, the eighth Annual Women In Data Science Conference. I'm your host, Lisa Martin. We are at Stanford University, as you know we are every year, having some wonderful conversations with some very inspiring women and men in data science and technical roles. I'm very pleased to introduce Tracy Zhang, my co-host, who is in the Data Journalism program at Stanford. And Tracy and I are pleased to welcome our next guest, Rhonda Crate, Principal Data Scientist at Boeing. Great to have you on the program, Rhonda. >> Tracy: Welcome. >> Hey, thanks for having me. >> Were you always interested in data science or STEM from the time you were young? >> No, actually. I was always interested in archeology and anthropology. >> That's right, we were talking about that, anthropology. Interesting. >> We saw the anthropology background, not even a bachelor's degree, but also a master's degree in anthropology. >> So you were committed for a while. >> I was, I was. I actually started college as a fine arts major, but I always wanted to be an archeologist. So at the last minute, 11 credits in, left to switch to anthropology. And then when I did my master's, I focused a little bit more on quantitative research methods and then I got my Stat Degree. >> Interesting. Talk about some of the data science projects that you're working on. When I think of Boeing, I always think of aircraft. But you are doing a lot of really cool things in IT, data analytics. Talk about some of those intriguing data science projects that you're working on. >> Yeah. So when I first started at Boeing, I worked in information technology and data analytics. And Boeing, at the time, had cored up data science in there. And so we worked as a function across the enterprise working on anything from shared services to user experience in IT products, to airplane programs. So, it has a wide range. I worked on environment health and safety projects for a long time as well. So looking at ergonomics and how people actually put parts onto airplanes, along with things like scheduling and production line, part failures, software testing. Yeah, there's a wide spectrum of things. >> But I think that's so fantastic. We've been talking, Tracy, today about just what we often see at WiDS, which is this breadth of diversity in people's background. You talked about anthropology, archeology, you're doing data science. But also all of the different opportunities that you've had at Boeing. To see so many facets of that organization. I always think that breadth of thought diversity can be hugely impactful. >> Yeah. So I will say my anthropology degree has actually worked to my benefit. I'm a huge proponent of integrating liberal arts and sciences together. And it actually helps me. I'm in the Technical Fellowship program at Boeing, so we have different career paths. So you can go into management, you can be a regular employee, or you can go into the Fellowship program. So right now I'm an Associate Technical Fellow. And part of how I got into the Fellowship program was that diversity in my background, what made me different, what made me stand out on projects. Even applying a human aspect to things like ergonomics, as silly as that sounds, but how does a person actually interact in the space along with, here are the actual measurements coming off of whatever system it is that you're working on. So, I think there's a lot of opportunities, especially in safety as well, which is a big initiative for Boeing right now, as you can imagine. >> Tracy: Yeah, definitely. >> I can't go into too specifics. >> No, 'cause we were like, I think a theme for today that kind of we brought up in in all of our talk is how data is about people, how data is about how people understand the world and how these data can make impact on people's lives. So yeah, I think it's great that you brought this up, and I'm very happy that your anthropology background can tap into that and help in your day-to-day data work too. >> Yeah. And currently, right now, I actually switched over to Strategic Workforce Planning. So it's more how we understand our workforce, how we work towards retaining the talent, how do we get the right talent in our space, and making sure overall that we offer a culture and work environment that is great for our employees to come to. >> That culture is so important. You know, I was looking at some anitab.org stats from 2022 and you know, we always talk about the number of women in technical roles. For a long time it's been hovering around that 25% range. The data from anitab.org showed from '22, it's now 27.6%. So, a little increase. But one of the biggest challenges still, and Tracy and I and our other co-host, Hannah, have been talking about this, is attrition. Attrition more than doubled last year. What are some of the things that Boeing is doing on the retention side, because that is so important especially as, you know, there's this pipeline leakage of women leaving technical roles. Tell us about what Boeing's, how they're invested. >> Yeah, sure. We actually have a publicly available Global Diversity Report that anybody can go and look at and see our statistics for our organization. Right now, off the top of my head, I think we're hovering at about 24% in the US for women in our company. It has been a male majority company for many years. We've invested heavily in increasing the number of women in roles. One interesting thing about this year that came out is that even though with the great resignation and those types of things, the attrition level between men and women were actually pretty close to being equal, which is like the first time in our history. Usually it tends on more women leaving. >> Lisa: That's a good sign. >> Right. >> Yes, that's a good sign. >> And we've actually focused on hiring and bringing in more women and diversity in our company. >> Yeah, some of the stats too from anitab.org talked about the increase, and I have to scroll back and find my notes, the increase in 51% more women being hired in 2022 than 2021 for technical roles. So the data, pun intended, is showing us. I mean, the data is there to show the impact that having females in executive leadership positions make from a revenue perspective. >> Tracy: Definitely. >> Companies are more profitable when there's women at the head, or at least in senior leadership roles. But we're seeing some positive trends, especially in terms of representation of women technologists. One of the things though that I found interesting, and I'm curious to get your thoughts on this, Rhonda, is that the representation of women technologists is growing in all areas, except interns. >> Rhonda: Hmm. >> So I think, we've got to go downstream. You teach, I have to go back to my notes on you, did my due diligence, R programming classes through Boeings Ed Wells program, this is for WSU College of Arts and Sciences, talk about what you teach and how do you think that intern kind of glut could be solved? >> Yeah. So, they're actually two separate programs. So I teach a data analytics course at Washington State University as an Adjunct Professor. And then the Ed Wells program is a SPEEA, which is an Aerospace Union, focused on bringing up more technology and skills to the actual workforce itself. So it's kind of a couple different audiences. One is more seasoned employees, right? The other one is our undergraduates. I teach a Capstone class, so it's a great way to introduce students to what it's actually like to work on an industry project. We partner with Google and Microsoft and Boeing on those. The idea is also that maybe those companies have openings for the students when they're done. Since it's Senior Capstone, there's not a lot of opportunities for internships. But the opportunities to actually get hired increase a little bit. In regards to Boeing, we've actually invested a lot in hiring more women interns. I think the number was 40%, but you'd have to double check. >> Lisa: That's great, that's fantastic. >> Tracy: That's way above average, I think. >> That's a good point. Yeah, it is above average. >> Double check on that. That's all from my memory. >> Is this your first WiDS, or have you been before? >> I did virtually last year. >> Okay. One of the things that I love, I love covering this event every year. theCUBE's been covering it since it's inception in 2015. But it's just the inspiration, the vibe here at Stanford is so positive. WiDS is a movement. It's not an initiative, an organization. There are going to be, I think annually this year, there will be 200 different events. Obviously today we're live on International Women's Day. 60 plus countries, 100,000 plus people involved. So, this is such a positive environment for women and men, because we need everybody, underrepresented minorities, to be able to understand the implication that data has across our lives. If we think about stripping away titles in industries, everybody is a consumer, not everybody, most of mobile devices. And we have this expectation, I was in Barcelona last week at a Mobile World Congress, we have this expectation that we're going to be connected 24/7. I can get whatever I want wherever I am in the world, and that's all data driven. And the average person that isn't involved in data science wouldn't understand that. At the same time, they have expectations that depend on organizations like Boeing being data driven so that they can get that experience that they expect in their consumer lives in any aspect of their lives. And that's one of the things I find so interesting and inspiring about data science. What are some of the things that keep you motivated to continue pursuing this? >> Yeah I will say along those lines, I think it's great to invest in K-12 programs for Data Literacy. I know one of my mentors and directors of the Data Analytics program, Dr. Nairanjana Dasgupta, we're really familiar with each other. So, she runs a WSU program for K-12 Data Literacy. It's also something that we strive for at Boeing, and we have an internal Data Literacy program because, believe it or not, most people are in business. And there's a lot of disconnect between interpreting and understanding data. For me, what kind of drives me to continue data science is that connection between people and data and how we use it to improve our world, which is partly why I work at Boeing too 'cause I feel that they produce products that people need like satellites and airplanes, >> Absolutely. >> and everything. >> Well, it's tangible, it's relatable. We can understand it. Can you do me a quick favor and define data literacy for anyone that might not understand what that means? >> Yeah, so it's just being able to understand elements of data, whether that's a bar chart or even in a sentence, like how to read a statistic and interpret a statistic in a sentence, for example. >> Very cool. >> Yeah. And sounds like Boeing's doing a great job in these programs, and also trying to hire more women. So yeah, I wanted to ask, do you think there's something that Boeing needs to work on? Or where do you see yourself working on say the next five years? >> Yeah, I think as a company, we always think that there's always room for improvement. >> It never, never stops. >> Tracy: Definitely. (laughs) >> I know workforce strategy is an area that they're currently really heavily investing in, along with safety. How do we build safer products for people? How do we help inform the public about things like Covid transmission in airports? For example, we had the Confident Traveler Initiative which was a big push that we had, and we had to be able to inform people about data models around Covid, right? So yeah, I would say our future is more about an investment in our people and in our culture from my perspective >> That's so important. One of the hardest things to change especially for a legacy organization like Boeing, is culture. You know, when I talk with CEO's or CIO's or COO's about what's your company's vision, what's your strategy? Especially those companies that are on that digital journey that have no choice these days. Everybody expects to have a digital experience, whether you're transacting an an Uber ride, you're buying groceries, or you're traveling by air. That culture sounds like Boeing is really focused on that. And that's impressive because that's one of the hardest things to morph and mold, but it's so essential. You know, as we look around the room here at WiDS it's obviously mostly females, but we're talking about women, underrepresented minorities. We're talking about men as well who are mentors and sponsors to us. I'd love to get your advice to your younger self. What would you tell yourself in terms of where you are now to become a leader in the technology field? >> Yeah, I mean, it's kind of an interesting question because I always try to think, live with no regrets to an extent. >> Lisa: I like that. >> But, there's lots of failures along the way. (Tracy laughing) I don't know if I would tell myself anything different because honestly, if I did, I wouldn't be where I am. >> Lisa: Good for you. >> I started out in fine arts, and I didn't end up there. >> That's good. >> Such a good point, yeah. >> We've been talking about that and I find that a lot at events like WiDS, is women have these zigzaggy patterns. I studied biology, I have a master's in molecular biology, I'm in media and marketing. We talked about transportable skills. There's a case I made many years ago when I got into tech about, well in science you learn the art of interpreting esoteric data and creating a story from it. And that's a transportable skill. But I always say, you mentioned failure, I always say failure is not a bad F word. It allows us to kind of zig and zag and learn along the way. And I think that really fosters thought diversity. And in data science, that is one of the things we absolutely need to have is that diversity and thought. You know, we talk about AI models being biased, we need the data and we need the diverse brains to help ensure that the biases are identified, extracted, and removed. Speaking of AI, I've been geeking out with ChatGPT. So, I'm on it yesterday and I ask it, "What's hot in data science?" And I was like, is it going to get that? What's hot? And it did it, it came back with trends. I think if I ask anything, "What's hot?", I should be to Paris Hilton, but I didn't. And so I was geeking out. One of the things I learned recently that I thought was so super cool is the CTO of OpenAI is a woman, Mira Murati, which I didn't know until over the weekend. Because I always think if I had to name top females in tech, who would they be? And I always default to Sheryl Sandberg, Carly Fiorina, Susan Wojcicki running YouTube. Who are some of the people in your history, in your current, that are really inspiring to you? Men, women, indifferent. >> Sure. I think Boeing is one of the companies where you actually do see a lot of women in leadership roles. I think we're one of the top companies with a number of women executives, actually. Susan Doniz, who's our Chief Information Officer, I believe she's actually slotted to speak at a WiDS event come fall. >> Lisa: Cool. >> So that will be exciting. Susan's actually relatively newer to Boeing in some ways. A Boeing time skill is like three years is still kind of new. (laughs) But she's been around for a while and she's done a lot of inspiring things, I think, for women in the organization. She does a lot with Latino communities and things like that as well. For me personally, you know, when I started at Boeing Ahmad Yaghoobi was one of my mentors and my Technical Lead. He came from Iran during a lot of hard times in the 1980s. His brother actually wrote a memoir, (laughs) which is just a fun, interesting fact. >> Tracy: Oh my God! >> Lisa: Wow! >> And so, I kind of gravitate to people that I can learn from that's not in my sphere, that might make me uncomfortable. >> And you probably don't even think about how many people you're influencing along the way. >> No. >> We just keep going and learning from our mentors and probably lose sight of, "I wonder how many people actually admire me?" And I'm sure there are many that admire you, Rhonda, for what you've done, going from anthropology to archeology. You mentioned before we went live you were really interested in photography. Keep going and really gathering all that breadth 'cause it's only making you more inspiring to people like us. >> Exactly. >> We thank you so much for joining us on the program and sharing a little bit about you and what brought you to WiDS. Thank you so much, Rhonda. >> Yeah, thank you. >> Tracy: Thank you so much for being here. >> Lisa: Yeah. >> Alright. >> For our guests, and for Tracy Zhang, this is Lisa Martin live at Stanford University covering the eighth Annual Women In Data Science Conference. Stick around. Next guest will be here in just a second. (gentle music)

Published Date : Mar 8 2023

SUMMARY :

Great to have you on the program, Rhonda. I was always interested in That's right, we were talking We saw the anthropology background, So at the last minute, 11 credits in, Talk about some of the And Boeing, at the time, had But also all of the I'm in the Technical that you brought this up, and making sure overall that we offer about the number of women at about 24% in the US more women and diversity in our company. I mean, the data is is that the representation and how do you think for the students when they're done. Lisa: That's great, Tracy: That's That's a good point. That's all from my memory. One of the things that I love, I think it's great to for anyone that might not being able to understand that Boeing needs to work on? we always think that there's Tracy: Definitely. the public about things One of the hardest things to change I always try to think, live along the way. I started out in fine arts, And I always default to Sheryl I believe she's actually slotted to speak So that will be exciting. to people that I can learn And you probably don't even think about from anthropology to archeology. and what brought you to WiDS. Tracy: Thank you so covering the eighth Annual Women

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
TracyPERSON

0.99+

Nairanjana DasguptaPERSON

0.99+

BoeingORGANIZATION

0.99+

Tracy ZhangPERSON

0.99+

RhondaPERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Mira MuratiPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Susan WojcickiPERSON

0.99+

Rhonda CratePERSON

0.99+

Susan DonizPERSON

0.99+

SusanPERSON

0.99+

Sheryl SandbergPERSON

0.99+

HannahPERSON

0.99+

27.6%QUANTITY

0.99+

2015DATE

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

WSU College of Arts and SciencesORGANIZATION

0.99+

40%QUANTITY

0.99+

2022DATE

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

IranLOCATION

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

International Women's DayEVENT

0.99+

11 creditsQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

51%QUANTITY

0.99+

Washington State UniversityORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Ahmad YaghoobiPERSON

0.99+

200 different eventsQUANTITY

0.99+

Carly FiorinaPERSON

0.99+

60 plus countriesQUANTITY

0.99+

1980sDATE

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

100,000 plus peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

'22DATE

0.98+

eighth Annual Women In Data Science ConferenceEVENT

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

two separate programsQUANTITY

0.98+

Stanford UniversityORGANIZATION

0.98+

eighth Annual Women In Data Science ConferenceEVENT

0.98+

Global Diversity ReportTITLE

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

The Truth About MySQL HeatWave


 

>>When Oracle acquired my SQL via the Sun acquisition, nobody really thought the company would put much effort into the platform preferring to focus all the wood behind its leading Oracle database, Arrow pun intended. But two years ago, Oracle surprised many folks by announcing my SQL Heatwave a new database as a service with a massively parallel hybrid Columbia in Mary Mary architecture that brings together transactional and analytic data in a single platform. Welcome to our latest database, power panel on the cube. My name is Dave Ante, and today we're gonna discuss Oracle's MySQL Heat Wave with a who's who of cloud database industry analysts. Holgar Mueller is with Constellation Research. Mark Stammer is the Dragon Slayer and Wikibon contributor. And Ron Westfall is with Fu Chim Research. Gentlemen, welcome back to the Cube. Always a pleasure to have you on. Thanks for having us. Great to be here. >>So we've had a number of of deep dive interviews on the Cube with Nip and Aggarwal. You guys know him? He's a senior vice president of MySQL, Heatwave Development at Oracle. I think you just saw him at Oracle Cloud World and he's come on to describe this is gonna, I'll call it a shock and awe feature additions to to heatwave. You know, the company's clearly putting r and d into the platform and I think at at cloud world we saw like the fifth major release since 2020 when they first announced MySQL heat wave. So just listing a few, they, they got, they taken, brought in analytics machine learning, they got autopilot for machine learning, which is automation onto the basic o l TP functionality of the database. And it's been interesting to watch Oracle's converge database strategy. We've contrasted that amongst ourselves. Love to get your thoughts on Amazon's get the right tool for the right job approach. >>Are they gonna have to change that? You know, Amazon's got the specialized databases, it's just, you know, the both companies are doing well. It just shows there are a lot of ways to, to skin a cat cuz you see some traction in the market in, in both approaches. So today we're gonna focus on the latest heat wave announcements and we're gonna talk about multi-cloud with a native MySQL heat wave implementation, which is available on aws MySQL heat wave for Azure via the Oracle Microsoft interconnect. This kind of cool hybrid action that they got going. Sometimes we call it super cloud. And then we're gonna dive into my SQL Heatwave Lake house, which allows users to process and query data across MyQ databases as heatwave databases, as well as object stores. So, and then we've got, heatwave has been announced on AWS and, and, and Azure, they're available now and Lake House I believe is in beta and I think it's coming out the second half of next year. So again, all of our guests are fresh off of Oracle Cloud world in Las Vegas. So they got the latest scoop. Guys, I'm done talking. Let's get into it. Mark, maybe you could start us off, what's your opinion of my SQL Heatwaves competitive position? When you think about what AWS is doing, you know, Google is, you know, we heard Google Cloud next recently, we heard about all their data innovations. You got, obviously Azure's got a big portfolio, snowflakes doing well in the market. What's your take? >>Well, first let's look at it from the point of view that AWS is the market leader in cloud and cloud services. They own somewhere between 30 to 50% depending on who you read of the market. And then you have Azure as number two and after that it falls off. There's gcp, Google Cloud platform, which is further way down the list and then Oracle and IBM and Alibaba. So when you look at AWS and you and Azure saying, hey, these are the market leaders in the cloud, then you start looking at it and saying, if I am going to provide a service that competes with the service they have, if I can make it available in their cloud, it means that I can be more competitive. And if I'm compelling and compelling means at least twice the performance or functionality or both at half the price, I should be able to gain market share. >>And that's what Oracle's done. They've taken a superior product in my SQL heat wave, which is faster, lower cost does more for a lot less at the end of the day and they make it available to the users of those clouds. You avoid this little thing called egress fees, you avoid the issue of having to migrate from one cloud to another and suddenly you have a very compelling offer. So I look at what Oracle's doing with MyQ and it feels like, I'm gonna use a word term, a flanking maneuver to their competition. They're offering a better service on their platforms. >>All right, so thank you for that. Holger, we've seen this sort of cadence, I sort of referenced it up front a little bit and they sat on MySQL for a decade, then all of a sudden we see this rush of announcements. Why did it take so long? And and more importantly is Oracle, are they developing the right features that cloud database customers are looking for in your view? >>Yeah, great question, but first of all, in your interview you said it's the edit analytics, right? Analytics is kind of like a marketing buzzword. Reports can be analytics, right? The interesting thing, which they did, the first thing they, they, they crossed the chasm between OTP and all up, right? In the same database, right? So major engineering feed very much what customers want and it's all about creating Bellevue for customers, which, which I think is the part why they go into the multi-cloud and why they add these capabilities. And they certainly with the AI capabilities, it's kind of like getting it into an autonomous field, self-driving field now with the lake cost capabilities and meeting customers where they are, like Mark has talked about the e risk costs in the cloud. So that that's a significant advantage, creating value for customers and that's what at the end of the day matters. >>And I believe strongly that long term it's gonna be ones who create better value for customers who will get more of their money From that perspective, why then take them so long? I think it's a great question. I think largely he mentioned the gentleman Nial, it's largely to who leads a product. I used to build products too, so maybe I'm a little fooling myself here, but that made the difference in my view, right? So since he's been charged, he's been building things faster than the rest of the competition, than my SQL space, which in hindsight we thought was a hot and smoking innovation phase. It kind of like was a little self complacent when it comes to the traditional borders of where, where people think, where things are separated between OTP and ola or as an example of adjacent support, right? Structured documents, whereas unstructured documents or databases and all of that has been collapsed and brought together for building a more powerful database for customers. >>So I mean it's certainly, you know, when, when Oracle talks about the competitors, you know, the competitors are in the, I always say they're, if the Oracle talks about you and knows you're doing well, so they talk a lot about aws, talk a little bit about Snowflake, you know, sort of Google, they have partnerships with Azure, but, but in, so I'm presuming that the response in MySQL heatwave was really in, in response to what they were seeing from those big competitors. But then you had Maria DB coming out, you know, the day that that Oracle acquired Sun and, and launching and going after the MySQL base. So it's, I'm, I'm interested and we'll talk about this later and what you guys think AWS and Google and Azure and Snowflake and how they're gonna respond. But, but before I do that, Ron, I want to ask you, you, you, you can get, you know, pretty technical and you've probably seen the benchmarks. >>I know you have Oracle makes a big deal out of it, publishes its benchmarks, makes some transparent on on GI GitHub. Larry Ellison talked about this in his keynote at Cloud World. What are the benchmarks show in general? I mean, when you, when you're new to the market, you gotta have a story like Mark was saying, you gotta be two x you know, the performance at half the cost or you better be or you're not gonna get any market share. So, and, and you know, oftentimes companies don't publish market benchmarks when they're leading. They do it when they, they need to gain share. So what do you make of the benchmarks? Have their, any results that were surprising to you? Have, you know, they been challenged by the competitors. Is it just a bunch of kind of desperate bench marketing to make some noise in the market or you know, are they real? What's your view? >>Well, from my perspective, I think they have the validity. And to your point, I believe that when it comes to competitor responses, that has not really happened. Nobody has like pulled down the information that's on GitHub and said, Oh, here are our price performance results. And they counter oracles. In fact, I think part of the reason why that hasn't happened is that there's the risk if Oracle's coming out and saying, Hey, we can deliver 17 times better query performance using our capabilities versus say, Snowflake when it comes to, you know, the Lakehouse platform and Snowflake turns around and says it's actually only 15 times better during performance, that's not exactly an effective maneuver. And so I think this is really to oracle's credit and I think it's refreshing because these differentiators are significant. We're not talking, you know, like 1.2% differences. We're talking 17 fold differences, we're talking six fold differences depending on, you know, where the spotlight is being shined and so forth. >>And so I think this is actually something that is actually too good to believe initially at first blush. If I'm a cloud database decision maker, I really have to prioritize this. I really would know, pay a lot more attention to this. And that's why I posed the question to Oracle and others like, okay, if these differentiators are so significant, why isn't the needle moving a bit more? And it's for, you know, some of the usual reasons. One is really deep discounting coming from, you know, the other players that's really kind of, you know, marketing 1 0 1, this is something you need to do when there's a real competitive threat to keep, you know, a customer in your own customer base. Plus there is the usual fear and uncertainty about moving from one platform to another. But I think, you know, the traction, the momentum is, is shifting an Oracle's favor. I think we saw that in the Q1 efforts, for example, where Oracle cloud grew 44% and that it generated, you know, 4.8 billion and revenue if I recall correctly. And so, so all these are demonstrating that's Oracle is making, I think many of the right moves, publishing these figures for anybody to look at from their own perspective is something that is, I think, good for the market and I think it's just gonna continue to pay dividends for Oracle down the horizon as you know, competition intens plots. So if I were in, >>Dave, can I, Dave, can I interject something and, and what Ron just said there? Yeah, please go ahead. A couple things here, one discounting, which is a common practice when you have a real threat, as Ron pointed out, isn't going to help much in this situation simply because you can't discount to the point where you improve your performance and the performance is a huge differentiator. You may be able to get your price down, but the problem that most of them have is they don't have an integrated product service. They don't have an integrated O L T P O L A P M L N data lake. Even if you cut out two of them, they don't have any of them integrated. They have multiple services that are required separate integration and that can't be overcome with discounting. And the, they, you have to pay for each one of these. And oh, by the way, as you grow, the discounts go away. So that's a, it's a minor important detail. >>So, so that's a TCO question mark, right? And I know you look at this a lot, if I had that kind of price performance advantage, I would be pounding tco, especially if I need two separate databases to do the job. That one can do, that's gonna be, the TCO numbers are gonna be off the chart or maybe down the chart, which you want. Have you looked at this and how does it compare with, you know, the big cloud guys, for example, >>I've looked at it in depth, in fact, I'm working on another TCO on this arena, but you can find it on Wiki bod in which I compared TCO for MySEQ Heat wave versus Aurora plus Redshift plus ML plus Blue. I've compared it against gcps services, Azure services, Snowflake with other services. And there's just no comparison. The, the TCO differences are huge. More importantly, thefor, the, the TCO per performance is huge. We're talking in some cases multiple orders of magnitude, but at least an order of magnitude difference. So discounting isn't gonna help you much at the end of the day, it's only going to lower your cost a little, but it doesn't improve the automation, it doesn't improve the performance, it doesn't improve the time to insight, it doesn't improve all those things that you want out of a database or multiple databases because you >>Can't discount yourself to a higher value proposition. >>So what about, I wonder ho if you could chime in on the developer angle. You, you followed that, that market. How do these innovations from heatwave, I think you used the term developer velocity. I've heard you used that before. Yeah, I mean, look, Oracle owns Java, okay, so it, it's, you know, most popular, you know, programming language in the world, blah, blah blah. But it does it have the, the minds and hearts of, of developers and does, where does heatwave fit into that equation? >>I think heatwave is gaining quickly mindshare on the developer side, right? It's not the traditional no sequel database which grew up, there's a traditional mistrust of oracles to developers to what was happening to open source when gets acquired. Like in the case of Oracle versus Java and where my sql, right? And, but we know it's not a good competitive strategy to, to bank on Oracle screwing up because it hasn't worked not on Java known my sequel, right? And for developers, it's, once you get to know a technology product and you can do more, it becomes kind of like a Swiss army knife and you can build more use case, you can build more powerful applications. That's super, super important because you don't have to get certified in multiple databases. You, you are fast at getting things done, you achieve fire, develop velocity, and the managers are happy because they don't have to license more things, send you to more trainings, have more risk of something not being delivered, right? >>So it's really the, we see the suite where this best of breed play happening here, which in general was happening before already with Oracle's flagship database. Whereas those Amazon as an example, right? And now the interesting thing is every step away Oracle was always a one database company that can be only one and they're now generally talking about heat web and that two database company with different market spaces, but same value proposition of integrating more things very, very quickly to have a universal database that I call, they call the converge database for all the needs of an enterprise to run certain application use cases. And that's what's attractive to developers. >>It's, it's ironic isn't it? I mean I, you know, the rumor was the TK Thomas Curian left Oracle cuz he wanted to put Oracle database on other clouds and other places. And maybe that was the rift. Maybe there was, I'm sure there was other things, but, but Oracle clearly is now trying to expand its Tam Ron with, with heatwave into aws, into Azure. How do you think Oracle's gonna do, you were at a cloud world, what was the sentiment from customers and the independent analyst? Is this just Oracle trying to screw with the competition, create a little diversion? Or is this, you know, serious business for Oracle? What do you think? >>No, I think it has lakes. I think it's definitely, again, attriting to Oracle's overall ability to differentiate not only my SQL heat wave, but its overall portfolio. And I think the fact that they do have the alliance with the Azure in place, that this is definitely demonstrating their commitment to meeting the multi-cloud needs of its customers as well as what we pointed to in terms of the fact that they're now offering, you know, MySQL capabilities within AWS natively and that it can now perform AWS's own offering. And I think this is all demonstrating that Oracle is, you know, not letting up, they're not resting on its laurels. That's clearly we are living in a multi-cloud world, so why not just make it more easy for customers to be able to use cloud databases according to their own specific, specific needs. And I think, you know, to holder's point, I think that definitely lines with being able to bring on more application developers to leverage these capabilities. >>I think one important announcement that's related to all this was the JSON relational duality capabilities where now it's a lot easier for application developers to use a language that they're very familiar with a JS O and not have to worry about going into relational databases to store their J S O N application coding. So this is, I think an example of the innovation that's enhancing the overall Oracle portfolio and certainly all the work with machine learning is definitely paying dividends as well. And as a result, I see Oracle continue to make these inroads that we pointed to. But I agree with Mark, you know, the short term discounting is just a stall tag. This is not denying the fact that Oracle is being able to not only deliver price performance differentiators that are dramatic, but also meeting a wide range of needs for customers out there that aren't just limited device performance consideration. >>Being able to support multi-cloud according to customer needs. Being able to reach out to the application developer community and address a very specific challenge that has plagued them for many years now. So bring it all together. Yeah, I see this as just enabling Oracles who ring true with customers. That the customers that were there were basically all of them, even though not all of them are going to be saying the same things, they're all basically saying positive feedback. And likewise, I think the analyst community is seeing this. It's always refreshing to be able to talk to customers directly and at Oracle cloud there was a litany of them and so this is just a difference maker as well as being able to talk to strategic partners. The nvidia, I think partnerships also testament to Oracle's ongoing ability to, you know, make the ecosystem more user friendly for the customers out there. >>Yeah, it's interesting when you get these all in one tools, you know, the Swiss Army knife, you expect that it's not able to be best of breed. That's the kind of surprising thing that I'm hearing about, about heatwave. I want to, I want to talk about Lake House because when I think of Lake House, I think data bricks, and to my knowledge data bricks hasn't been in the sites of Oracle yet. Maybe they're next, but, but Oracle claims that MySQL, heatwave, Lakehouse is a breakthrough in terms of capacity and performance. Mark, what are your thoughts on that? Can you double click on, on Lakehouse Oracle's claims for things like query performance and data loading? What does it mean for the market? Is Oracle really leading in, in the lake house competitive landscape? What are your thoughts? >>Well, but name in the game is what are the problems you're solving for the customer? More importantly, are those problems urgent or important? If they're urgent, customers wanna solve 'em. Now if they're important, they might get around to them. So you look at what they're doing with Lake House or previous to that machine learning or previous to that automation or previous to that O L A with O ltp and they're merging all this capability together. If you look at Snowflake or data bricks, they're tacking one problem. You look at MyQ heat wave, they're tacking multiple problems. So when you say, yeah, their queries are much better against the lake house in combination with other analytics in combination with O ltp and the fact that there are no ETLs. So you're getting all this done in real time. So it's, it's doing the query cross, cross everything in real time. >>You're solving multiple user and developer problems, you're increasing their ability to get insight faster, you're having shorter response times. So yeah, they really are solving urgent problems for customers. And by putting it where the customer lives, this is the brilliance of actually being multicloud. And I know I'm backing up here a second, but by making it work in AWS and Azure where people already live, where they already have applications, what they're saying is, we're bringing it to you. You don't have to come to us to get these, these benefits, this value overall, I think it's a brilliant strategy. I give Nip and Argo wallet a huge, huge kudos for what he's doing there. So yes, what they're doing with the lake house is going to put notice on data bricks and Snowflake and everyone else for that matter. Well >>Those are guys that whole ago you, you and I have talked about this. Those are, those are the guys that are doing sort of the best of breed. You know, they're really focused and they, you know, tend to do well at least out of the gate. Now you got Oracle's converged philosophy, obviously with Oracle database. We've seen that now it's kicking in gear with, with heatwave, you know, this whole thing of sweets versus best of breed. I mean the long term, you know, customers tend to migrate towards suite, but the new shiny toy tends to get the growth. How do you think this is gonna play out in cloud database? >>Well, it's the forever never ending story, right? And in software right suite, whereas best of breed and so far in the long run suites have always won, right? So, and sometimes they struggle again because the inherent problem of sweets is you build something larger, it has more complexity and that means your cycles to get everything working together to integrate the test that roll it out, certify whatever it is, takes you longer, right? And that's not the case. It's a fascinating part of what the effort around my SQL heat wave is that the team is out executing the previous best of breed data, bringing us something together. Now if they can maintain that pace, that's something to to, to be seen. But it, the strategy, like what Mark was saying, bring the software to the data is of course interesting and unique and totally an Oracle issue in the past, right? >>Yeah. But it had to be in your database on oci. And but at, that's an interesting part. The interesting thing on the Lake health side is, right, there's three key benefits of a lakehouse. The first one is better reporting analytics, bring more rich information together, like make the, the, the case for silicon angle, right? We want to see engagements for this video, we want to know what's happening. That's a mixed transactional video media use case, right? Typical Lakehouse use case. The next one is to build more rich applications, transactional applications which have video and these elements in there, which are the engaging one. And the third one, and that's where I'm a little critical and concerned, is it's really the base platform for artificial intelligence, right? To run deep learning to run things automatically because they have all the data in one place can create in one way. >>And that's where Oracle, I know that Ron talked about Invidia for a moment, but that's where Oracle doesn't have the strongest best story. Nonetheless, the two other main use cases of the lake house are very strong, very well only concern is four 50 terabyte sounds long. It's an arbitrary limitation. Yeah, sounds as big. So for the start, and it's the first word, they can make that bigger. You don't want your lake house to be limited and the terabyte sizes or any even petabyte size because you want to have the certainty. I can put everything in there that I think it might be relevant without knowing what questions to ask and query those questions. >>Yeah. And you know, in the early days of no schema on right, it just became a mess. But now technology has evolved to allow us to actually get more value out of that data. Data lake. Data swamp is, you know, not much more, more, more, more logical. But, and I want to get in, in a moment, I want to come back to how you think the competitors are gonna respond. Are they gonna have to sort of do a more of a converged approach? AWS in particular? But before I do, Ron, I want to ask you a question about autopilot because I heard Larry Ellison's keynote and he was talking about how, you know, most security issues are human errors with autonomy and autonomous database and things like autopilot. We take care of that. It's like autonomous vehicles, they're gonna be safer. And I went, well maybe, maybe someday. So Oracle really tries to emphasize this, that every time you see an announcement from Oracle, they talk about new, you know, autonomous capabilities. It, how legit is it? Do people care? What about, you know, what's new for heatwave Lakehouse? How much of a differentiator, Ron, do you really think autopilot is in this cloud database space? >>Yeah, I think it will definitely enhance the overall proposition. I don't think people are gonna buy, you know, lake house exclusively cause of autopilot capabilities, but when they look at the overall picture, I think it will be an added capability bonus to Oracle's benefit. And yeah, I think it's kind of one of these age old questions, how much do you automate and what is the bounce to strike? And I think we all understand with the automatic car, autonomous car analogy that there are limitations to being able to use that. However, I think it's a tool that basically every organization out there needs to at least have or at least evaluate because it goes to the point of it helps with ease of use, it helps make automation more balanced in terms of, you know, being able to test, all right, let's automate this process and see if it works well, then we can go on and switch on on autopilot for other processes. >>And then, you know, that allows, for example, the specialists to spend more time on business use cases versus, you know, manual maintenance of, of the cloud database and so forth. So I think that actually is a, a legitimate value proposition. I think it's just gonna be a case by case basis. Some organizations are gonna be more aggressive with putting automation throughout their processes throughout their organization. Others are gonna be more cautious. But it's gonna be, again, something that will help the overall Oracle proposition. And something that I think will be used with caution by many organizations, but other organizations are gonna like, hey, great, this is something that is really answering a real problem. And that is just easing the use of these databases, but also being able to better handle the automation capabilities and benefits that come with it without having, you know, a major screwup happened and the process of transitioning to more automated capabilities. >>Now, I didn't attend cloud world, it's just too many red eyes, you know, recently, so I passed. But one of the things I like to do at those events is talk to customers, you know, in the spirit of the truth, you know, they, you know, you'd have the hallway, you know, track and to talk to customers and they say, Hey, you know, here's the good, the bad and the ugly. So did you guys, did you talk to any customers my SQL Heatwave customers at, at cloud world? And and what did you learn? I don't know, Mark, did you, did you have any luck and, and having some, some private conversations? >>Yeah, I had quite a few private conversations. The one thing before I get to that, I want disagree with one point Ron made, I do believe there are customers out there buying the heat wave service, the MySEQ heat wave server service because of autopilot. Because autopilot is really revolutionary in many ways in the sense for the MySEQ developer in that it, it auto provisions, it auto parallel loads, IT auto data places it auto shape predictions. It can tell you what machine learning models are going to tell you, gonna give you your best results. And, and candidly, I've yet to meet a DBA who didn't wanna give up pedantic tasks that are pain in the kahoo, which they'd rather not do and if it's long as it was done right for them. So yes, I do think people are buying it because of autopilot and that's based on some of the conversations I had with customers at Oracle Cloud World. >>In fact, it was like, yeah, that's great, yeah, we get fantastic performance, but this really makes my life easier and I've yet to meet a DBA who didn't want to make their life easier. And it does. So yeah, I've talked to a few of them. They were excited. I asked them if they ran into any bugs, were there any difficulties in moving to it? And the answer was no. In both cases, it's interesting to note, my sequel is the most popular database on the planet. Well, some will argue that it's neck and neck with SQL Server, but if you add in Mariah DB and ProCon db, which are forks of MySQL, then yeah, by far and away it's the most popular. And as a result of that, everybody for the most part has typically a my sequel database somewhere in their organization. So this is a brilliant situation for anybody going after MyQ, but especially for heat wave. And the customers I talk to love it. I didn't find anybody complaining about it. And >>What about the migration? We talked about TCO earlier. Did your t does your TCO analysis include the migration cost or do you kind of conveniently leave that out or what? >>Well, when you look at migration costs, there are different kinds of migration costs. By the way, the worst job in the data center is the data migration manager. Forget it, no other job is as bad as that one. You get no attaboys for doing it. Right? And then when you screw up, oh boy. So in real terms, anything that can limit data migration is a good thing. And when you look at Data Lake, that limits data migration. So if you're already a MySEQ user, this is a pure MySQL as far as you're concerned. It's just a, a simple transition from one to the other. You may wanna make sure nothing broke and every you, all your tables are correct and your schema's, okay, but it's all the same. So it's a simple migration. So it's pretty much a non-event, right? When you migrate data from an O LTP to an O L A P, that's an ETL and that's gonna take time. >>But you don't have to do that with my SQL heat wave. So that's gone when you start talking about machine learning, again, you may have an etl, you may not, depending on the circumstances, but again, with my SQL heat wave, you don't, and you don't have duplicate storage, you don't have to copy it from one storage container to another to be able to be used in a different database, which by the way, ultimately adds much more cost than just the other service. So yeah, I looked at the migration and again, the users I talked to said it was a non-event. It was literally moving from one physical machine to another. If they had a new version of MySEQ running on something else and just wanted to migrate it over or just hook it up or just connect it to the data, it worked just fine. >>Okay, so every day it sounds like you guys feel, and we've certainly heard this, my colleague David Foyer, the semi-retired David Foyer was always very high on heatwave. So I think you knows got some real legitimacy here coming from a standing start, but I wanna talk about the competition, how they're likely to respond. I mean, if your AWS and you got heatwave is now in your cloud, so there's some good aspects of that. The database guys might not like that, but the infrastructure guys probably love it. Hey, more ways to sell, you know, EC two and graviton, but you're gonna, the database guys in AWS are gonna respond. They're gonna say, Hey, we got Redshift, we got aqua. What's your thoughts on, on not only how that's gonna resonate with customers, but I'm interested in what you guys think will a, I never say never about aws, you know, and are they gonna try to build, in your view a converged Oola and o LTP database? You know, Snowflake is taking an ecosystem approach. They've added in transactional capabilities to the portfolio so they're not standing still. What do you guys see in the competitive landscape in that regard going forward? Maybe Holger, you could start us off and anybody else who wants to can chime in, >>Happy to, you mentioned Snowflake last, we'll start there. I think Snowflake is imitating that strategy, right? That building out original data warehouse and the clouds tasking project to really proposition to have other data available there because AI is relevant for everybody. Ultimately people keep data in the cloud for ultimately running ai. So you see the same suite kind of like level strategy, it's gonna be a little harder because of the original positioning. How much would people know that you're doing other stuff? And I just, as a former developer manager of developers, I just don't see the speed at the moment happening at Snowflake to become really competitive to Oracle. On the flip side, putting my Oracle hat on for a moment back to you, Mark and Iran, right? What could Oracle still add? Because the, the big big things, right? The traditional chasms in the database world, they have built everything, right? >>So I, I really scratched my hat and gave Nipon a hard time at Cloud world say like, what could you be building? Destiny was very conservative. Let's get the Lakehouse thing done, it's gonna spring next year, right? And the AWS is really hard because AWS value proposition is these small innovation teams, right? That they build two pizza teams, which can be fit by two pizzas, not large teams, right? And you need suites to large teams to build these suites with lots of functionalities to make sure they work together. They're consistent, they have the same UX on the administration side, they can consume the same way, they have the same API registry, can't even stop going where the synergy comes to play over suite. So, so it's gonna be really, really hard for them to change that. But AWS super pragmatic. They're always by themselves that they'll listen to customers if they learn from customers suite as a proposition. I would not be surprised if AWS trying to bring things closer together, being morely together. >>Yeah. Well how about, can we talk about multicloud if, if, again, Oracle is very on on Oracle as you said before, but let's look forward, you know, half a year or a year. What do you think about Oracle's moves in, in multicloud in terms of what kind of penetration they're gonna have in the marketplace? You saw a lot of presentations at at cloud world, you know, we've looked pretty closely at the, the Microsoft Azure deal. I think that's really interesting. I've, I've called it a little bit of early days of a super cloud. What impact do you think this is gonna have on, on the marketplace? But, but both. And think about it within Oracle's customer base, I have no doubt they'll do great there. But what about beyond its existing install base? What do you guys think? >>Ryan, do you wanna jump on that? Go ahead. Go ahead Ryan. No, no, no, >>That's an excellent point. I think it aligns with what we've been talking about in terms of Lakehouse. I think Lake House will enable Oracle to pull more customers, more bicycle customers onto the Oracle platforms. And I think we're seeing all the signs pointing toward Oracle being able to make more inroads into the overall market. And that includes garnishing customers from the leaders in, in other words, because they are, you know, coming in as a innovator, a an alternative to, you know, the AWS proposition, the Google cloud proposition that they have less to lose and there's a result they can really drive the multi-cloud messaging to resonate with not only their existing customers, but also to be able to, to that question, Dave's posing actually garnish customers onto their platform. And, and that includes naturally my sequel but also OCI and so forth. So that's how I'm seeing this playing out. I think, you know, again, Oracle's reporting is indicating that, and I think what we saw, Oracle Cloud world is definitely validating the idea that Oracle can make more waves in the overall market in this regard. >>You know, I, I've floated this idea of Super cloud, it's kind of tongue in cheek, but, but there, I think there is some merit to it in terms of building on top of hyperscale infrastructure and abstracting some of the, that complexity. And one of the things that I'm most interested in is industry clouds and an Oracle acquisition of Cerner. I was struck by Larry Ellison's keynote, it was like, I don't know, an hour and a half and an hour and 15 minutes was focused on healthcare transformation. Well, >>So vertical, >>Right? And so, yeah, so you got Oracle's, you know, got some industry chops and you, and then you think about what they're building with, with not only oci, but then you got, you know, MyQ, you can now run in dedicated regions. You got ADB on on Exadata cloud to customer, you can put that OnPrem in in your data center and you look at what the other hyperscalers are, are doing. I I say other hyperscalers, I've always said Oracle's not really a hyperscaler, but they got a cloud so they're in the game. But you can't get, you know, big query OnPrem, you look at outposts, it's very limited in terms of, you know, the database support and again, that that will will evolve. But now you got Oracle's got, they announced Alloy, we can white label their cloud. So I'm interested in what you guys think about these moves, especially the industry cloud. We see, you know, Walmart is doing sort of their own cloud. You got Goldman Sachs doing a cloud. Do you, you guys, what do you think about that and what role does Oracle play? Any thoughts? >>Yeah, let me lemme jump on that for a moment. Now, especially with the MyQ, by making that available in multiple clouds, what they're doing is this follows the philosophy they've had the past with doing cloud, a customer taking the application and the data and putting it where the customer lives. If it's on premise, it's on premise. If it's in the cloud, it's in the cloud. By making the mice equal heat wave, essentially a plug compatible with any other mice equal as far as your, your database is concern and then giving you that integration with O L A P and ML and Data Lake and everything else, then what you've got is a compelling offering. You're making it easier for the customer to use. So I look the difference between MyQ and the Oracle database, MyQ is going to capture market more market share for them. >>You're not gonna find a lot of new users for the Oracle debate database. Yeah, there are always gonna be new users, don't get me wrong, but it's not gonna be a huge growth. Whereas my SQL heatwave is probably gonna be a major growth engine for Oracle going forward. Not just in their own cloud, but in AWS and in Azure and on premise over time that eventually it'll get there. It's not there now, but it will, they're doing the right thing on that basis. They're taking the services and when you talk about multicloud and making them available where the customer wants them, not forcing them to go where you want them, if that makes sense. And as far as where they're going in the future, I think they're gonna take a page outta what they've done with the Oracle database. They'll add things like JSON and XML and time series and spatial over time they'll make it a, a complete converged database like they did with the Oracle database. The difference being Oracle database will scale bigger and will have more transactions and be somewhat faster. And my SQL will be, for anyone who's not on the Oracle database, they're, they're not stupid, that's for sure. >>They've done Jason already. Right. But I give you that they could add graph and time series, right. Since eat with, Right, Right. Yeah, that's something absolutely right. That's, that's >>A sort of a logical move, right? >>Right. But that's, that's some kid ourselves, right? I mean has worked in Oracle's favor, right? 10 x 20 x, the amount of r and d, which is in the MyQ space, has been poured at trying to snatch workloads away from Oracle by starting with IBM 30 years ago, 20 years ago, Microsoft and, and, and, and didn't work, right? Database applications are extremely sticky when they run, you don't want to touch SIM and grow them, right? So that doesn't mean that heat phase is not an attractive offering, but it will be net new things, right? And what works in my SQL heat wave heat phases favor a little bit is it's not the massive enterprise applications which have like we the nails like, like you might be only running 30% or Oracle, but the connections and the interfaces into that is, is like 70, 80% of your enterprise. >>You take it out and it's like the spaghetti ball where you say, ah, no I really don't, don't want to do all that. Right? You don't, don't have that massive part with the equals heat phase sequel kind of like database which are more smaller tactical in comparison, but still I, I don't see them taking so much share. They will be growing because of a attractive value proposition quickly on the, the multi-cloud, right? I think it's not really multi-cloud. If you give people the chance to run your offering on different clouds, right? You can run it there. The multi-cloud advantages when the Uber offering comes out, which allows you to do things across those installations, right? I can migrate data, I can create data across something like Google has done with B query Omni, I can run predictive models or even make iron models in different place and distribute them, right? And Oracle is paving the road for that, but being available on these clouds. But the multi-cloud capability of database which knows I'm running on different clouds that is still yet to be built there. >>Yeah. And >>That the problem with >>That, that's the super cloud concept that I flowed and I I've always said kinda snowflake with a single global instance is sort of, you know, headed in that direction and maybe has a league. What's the issue with that mark? >>Yeah, the problem with the, with that version, the multi-cloud is clouds to charge egress fees. As long as they charge egress fees to move data between clouds, it's gonna make it very difficult to do a real multi-cloud implementation. Even Snowflake, which runs multi-cloud, has to pass out on the egress fees of their customer when data moves between clouds. And that's really expensive. I mean there, there is one customer I talked to who is beta testing for them, the MySQL heatwave and aws. The only reason they didn't want to do that until it was running on AWS is the egress fees were so great to move it to OCI that they couldn't afford it. Yeah. Egress fees are the big issue but, >>But Mark the, the point might be you might wanna root query and only get the results set back, right was much more tinier, which been the answer before for low latency between the class A problem, which we sometimes still have but mostly don't have. Right? And I think in general this with fees coming down based on the Oracle general E with fee move and it's very hard to justify those, right? But, but it's, it's not about moving data as a multi-cloud high value use case. It's about doing intelligent things with that data, right? Putting into other places, replicating it, what I'm saying the same thing what you said before, running remote queries on that, analyzing it, running AI on it, running AI models on that. That's the interesting thing. Cross administered in the same way. Taking things out, making sure compliance happens. Making sure when Ron says I don't want to be American anymore, I want to be in the European cloud that is gets migrated, right? So tho those are the interesting value use case which are really, really hard for enterprise to program hand by hand by developers and they would love to have out of the box and that's yet the innovation to come to, we have to come to see. But the first step to get there is that your software runs in multiple clouds and that's what Oracle's doing so well with my SQL >>Guys. Amazing. >>Go ahead. Yeah. >>Yeah. >>For example, >>Amazing amount of data knowledge and, and brain power in this market. Guys, I really want to thank you for coming on to the cube. Ron Holger. Mark, always a pleasure to have you on. Really appreciate your time. >>Well all the last names we're very happy for Romanic last and moderator. Thanks Dave for moderating us. All right, >>We'll see. We'll see you guys around. Safe travels to all and thank you for watching this power panel, The Truth About My SQL Heat Wave on the cube. Your leader in enterprise and emerging tech coverage.

Published Date : Nov 1 2022

SUMMARY :

Always a pleasure to have you on. I think you just saw him at Oracle Cloud World and he's come on to describe this is doing, you know, Google is, you know, we heard Google Cloud next recently, They own somewhere between 30 to 50% depending on who you read migrate from one cloud to another and suddenly you have a very compelling offer. All right, so thank you for that. And they certainly with the AI capabilities, And I believe strongly that long term it's gonna be ones who create better value for So I mean it's certainly, you know, when, when Oracle talks about the competitors, So what do you make of the benchmarks? say, Snowflake when it comes to, you know, the Lakehouse platform and threat to keep, you know, a customer in your own customer base. And oh, by the way, as you grow, And I know you look at this a lot, to insight, it doesn't improve all those things that you want out of a database or multiple databases So what about, I wonder ho if you could chime in on the developer angle. they don't have to license more things, send you to more trainings, have more risk of something not being delivered, all the needs of an enterprise to run certain application use cases. I mean I, you know, the rumor was the TK Thomas Curian left Oracle And I think, you know, to holder's point, I think that definitely lines But I agree with Mark, you know, the short term discounting is just a stall tag. testament to Oracle's ongoing ability to, you know, make the ecosystem Yeah, it's interesting when you get these all in one tools, you know, the Swiss Army knife, you expect that it's not able So when you say, yeah, their queries are much better against the lake house in You don't have to come to us to get these, these benefits, I mean the long term, you know, customers tend to migrate towards suite, but the new shiny bring the software to the data is of course interesting and unique and totally an Oracle issue in And the third one, lake house to be limited and the terabyte sizes or any even petabyte size because you want keynote and he was talking about how, you know, most security issues are human I don't think people are gonna buy, you know, lake house exclusively cause of And then, you know, that allows, for example, the specialists to And and what did you learn? The one thing before I get to that, I want disagree with And the customers I talk to love it. the migration cost or do you kind of conveniently leave that out or what? And when you look at Data Lake, that limits data migration. So that's gone when you start talking about So I think you knows got some real legitimacy here coming from a standing start, So you see the same And you need suites to large teams to build these suites with lots of functionalities You saw a lot of presentations at at cloud world, you know, we've looked pretty closely at Ryan, do you wanna jump on that? I think, you know, again, Oracle's reporting I think there is some merit to it in terms of building on top of hyperscale infrastructure and to customer, you can put that OnPrem in in your data center and you look at what the So I look the difference between MyQ and the Oracle database, MyQ is going to capture market They're taking the services and when you talk about multicloud and But I give you that they could add graph and time series, right. like, like you might be only running 30% or Oracle, but the connections and the interfaces into You take it out and it's like the spaghetti ball where you say, ah, no I really don't, global instance is sort of, you know, headed in that direction and maybe has a league. Yeah, the problem with the, with that version, the multi-cloud is clouds And I think in general this with fees coming down based on the Oracle general E with fee move Yeah. Guys, I really want to thank you for coming on to the cube. Well all the last names we're very happy for Romanic last and moderator. We'll see you guys around.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
MarkPERSON

0.99+

Ron HolgerPERSON

0.99+

RonPERSON

0.99+

Mark StammerPERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Ron WestfallPERSON

0.99+

RyanPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

WalmartORGANIZATION

0.99+

Larry EllisonPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

AlibabaORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Holgar MuellerPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Constellation ResearchORGANIZATION

0.99+

Goldman SachsORGANIZATION

0.99+

17 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

David FoyerPERSON

0.99+

44%QUANTITY

0.99+

1.2%QUANTITY

0.99+

4.8 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

JasonPERSON

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

Fu Chim ResearchORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave AntePERSON

0.99+

Adam Meyers, CrowdStrike | CrowdStrike Fal.Con 2022


 

>> We're back at the ARIA Las Vegas. We're covering CrowdStrike's Fal.Con 22. First one since 2019. Dave Vellante and Dave Nicholson on theCUBE. Adam Meyers is here, he is the Senior Vice President of Intelligence at CrowdStrike. Adam, thanks for coming to theCUBE. >> Thanks for having me. >> Interesting times, isn't it? You're very welcome. Senior Vice President of Intelligence, tell us what your role is. >> So I run all of our intelligence offerings. All of our analysts, we have a couple hundred analysts that work at CrowdStrike tracking threat actors. There's 185 threat actors that we track today. We're constantly adding more of them and it requires us to really have that visibility and understand how they operate so that we can inform our other products: our XDR, our Cloud Workload Protections and really integrate all of this around the threat actor. >> So it's that threat hunting capability that CrowdStrike has. That's what you're sort of... >> Well, so think of it this way. When we launched the company 11 years ago yesterday, what we wanted to do was to tell customers, to tell people that, well, you don't have a malware problem, you have an adversary problem. There are humans that are out there conducting these attacks, and if you know who they are what they're up to, how they operate then you're better positioned to defend against them. And so that's really at the core, what CrowdStrike started with and all of our products are powered by intelligence. All of our services are our OverWatch and our Falcon complete, all powered by intelligence because we want to know who the threat actors are and what they're doing so we can stop them. >> So for instance like you can stop known malware. A lot of companies can stop known malware, but you also can stop unknown malware. And I infer that the intelligence is part of that equation, is that right? >> Absolutely. That that's the outcome. That's the output of the intelligence but I could also tell you who these threat actors are, where they're operating out of, show you pictures of some of them, that's the threat intel. We are tracking down to the individual persona in many cases, these various threats whether they be Chinese nation state, Russian threat actors, Iran, North Korea, we track as I said, quite a few of these threats. And over time, we develop a really robust deep knowledge about who they are and how they operate. >> Okay. And we're going to get into some of that, the big four and cyber. But before we do, I want to ask you about the eCrime index stats, the ECX you guys call it a little side joke for all your nerds out there. Maybe you could explain that Adam >> Assembly humor. >> Yeah right, right. So, but, what is that index? You guys, how often do you publish it? What are you learning from that? >> Yeah, so it was modeled off of the Dow Jones industrial average. So if you look at the Dow Jones it's a composite index that was started in the late 1800s. And they took a couple of different companies that were the industrial component of the economy back then, right. Textiles and railroads and coal and steel and things like that. And they use that to approximate the overall health of the economy. So if you take these different stocks together, swizzle 'em together, and figure out some sort of number you could say, look, it's up. The economy's doing good. It's down, not doing so good. So after World War II, everybody was exuberant and positive about the end of the war. The DGI goes up, the oil crisis in the seventies goes down, COVID hits goes up, sorry, goes down. And then everybody realizes that they can use Amazon still and they can still get the things they need goes back up with the eCrime index. We took that approach to say what is the health of the underground economy? When you read about any of these ransomware attacks or data extortion attacks there are criminal groups that are working together in order to get things spammed out or to buy credentials and things like that. And so what the eCrime index does is it takes 24 different observables, right? The price of a ransom, the number of ransom attacks, the fluctuation in cryptocurrency, how much stolen material is being sold for on the underground. And we're constantly computing this number to understand is the eCrime ecosystem healthy? Is it thriving or is it under pressure? And that lets us understand what's going on in the world and kind of contextualize it. Give an example, Microsoft on patch Tuesday releases 56 vulnerabilities. 11 of them are critical. Well guess what? After hack Tuesday. So after patch Tuesday is hack Wednesday. And so all of those 11 vulnerabilities are exploitable. And now you have threat actors that have a whole new array of weapons that they can deploy and bring to bear against their victims after that patch Tuesday. So that's hack Wednesday. Conversely we'll get something like the colonial pipeline. Colonial pipeline attack May of 21, I think it was, comes out and all of the various underground forums where these ransomware operators are doing their business. They freak out because they don't want law enforcement. President Biden is talking about them and he's putting pressure on them. They don't want this ransomware component of what they're doing to bring law enforcement, bring heat on them. So they deplatform them. They kick 'em off. And when they do that, the ransomware stops being as much of a factor at that point in time. And the eCrime index goes down. So we can look at holidays, and right around Thanksgiving, which is coming up pretty soon, it's going to go up because there's so much online commerce with cyber Monday and such, right? You're going to see this increase in online activity; eCrime actors want to take advantage of that. When Christmas comes, they take vacation too; they're going to spend time with their families, so it goes back down and it stays down till around the end of the Russian Orthodox Christmas, which you can probably extrapolate why that is. And then it goes back up. So as it's fluctuating, it gives us the ability to really just start tracking what that economy looks like. >> Realtime indicator of that crypto. >> I mean, you talked about, talked about hack Wednesday, and before that you mentioned, you know, the big four, and I think you said 185 threat actors that you're tracking, is 180, is number 185 on that list? Somebody living in their basement in their mom's basement or are the resources necessary to get on that list? Such that it's like, no, no, no, no. this is very, very organized, large groups of people. Hollywood would have you believe that it's guy with a laptop, hack Wednesday, (Dave Nicholson mimics keyboard clacking noises) and everything done. >> Right. >> Are there individuals who are doing things like that or are these typically very well organized? >> That's a great question. And I think it's an important one to ask and it's both it tends to be more, the bigger groups. There are some one-off ones where it's one or two people. Sometimes they get big. Sometimes they get small. One of the big challenges. Have you heard of ransomware as a service? >> Of course. Oh my God. Any knucklehead can be a ransomwarist. >> Exactly. So we don't track those knuckleheads as much unless they get onto our radar somehow, they're conducting a lot of operations against our customers or something like that. But what we do track is that ransomware as a service platform because the affiliates, the people that are using it they come, they go and, you know, it could be they're only there for a period of time. Sometimes they move between different ransomware services, right? They'll use the one that's most useful for them that that week or that month, they're getting the best rate because it's rev sharing. They get a percentage that platform gets percentage of the ransom. So, you know, they negotiate a better deal. They might move to a different ransomware platform. So that's really hard to track. And it's also, you know, I think more important for us to understand the platform and the technology that is being used than the individual that's doing it. >> Yeah. Makes sense. Alright, let's talk about the big four. China, Iran, North Korea, and Russia. Tell us about, you know, how you monitor these folks. Are there different signatures for each? Can you actually tell, you know based on the hack who's behind it? >> So yeah, it starts off, you know motivation is a huge factor. China conducts espionage, they do it for diplomatic purposes. They do it for military and political purposes. And they do it for economic espionage. All of these things map to known policies that they put out, the Five Year Plan, the Made in China 2025, the Belt and Road Initiative, it's all part of their efforts to become a regional and ultimately a global hegemon. >> They're not stealing nickels and dimes. >> No they're stealing intellectual property. They're stealing trade secrets. They're stealing negotiation points. When there's, you know a high speed rail or something like that. And they use a set of tools and they have a set of behaviors and they have a set of infrastructure and a set of targets that as we look at all of these things together we can derive who they are by motivation and the longer we observe them, the more data we get, the more we can get that attribution. I could tell you that there's X number of Chinese threat groups that we track under Panda, right? And they're associated with the Ministry of State Security. There's a whole other set. That's too associated with the People's Liberation Army Strategic Support Force. So, I mean, these are big operations. They're intelligence agencies that are operating out of China. Iran has a different set of targets. They have a different set of motives. They go after North American and Israeli businesses right now that's kind of their main operation. And they're doing something called hack and lock and leak. With a lock and leak, what they're doing is they're deploying ransomware. They don't care about getting a ransom payment. They're just doing it to disrupt the target. And then they're leaking information that they steal during that operation that brings embarrassment. It brings compliance, regulatory, legal impact for that particular entity. So it's disruptive >> The chaos creators that's.. >> Well, you know I think they're trying to create a they're trying to really impact the legitimacy of some of these targets and the trust that their customers and their partners and people have in them. And that is psychological warfare in a certain way. And it, you know is really part of their broader initiative. Look at some of the other things that they've done they've hacked into like the missile defense system in Israel, and they've turned on the sirens, right? Those are all things that they're doing for a specific purpose, and that's not China, right? Like as you start to look at this stuff, you can start to really understand what they're up to. Russia very much been busy targeting NATO and NATO countries and Ukraine. Obviously the conflict that started in February has been a huge focus for these threat actors. And then as we look at North Korea, totally different. They're doing, there was a major crypto attack today. They're going after these crypto platforms, they're going after DeFi platforms. They're going after all of this stuff that most people don't even understand and they're stealing the crypto currency and they're using it for revenue generation. These nuclear weapons don't pay for themselves, their research and development don't pay for themselves. And so they're using that cyber operation to either steal money or steal intelligence. >> They need the cash. Yeah. >> Yeah. And they also do economic targeting because Kim Jong Un had said back in 2016 that they need to improve the lives of North Koreans. They have this national economic development strategy. And that means that they need, you know, I think only 30% of North Korea has access to reliable power. So having access to clean energy sources and renewable energy sources, that's important to keep the people happy and stop them from rising up against the regime. So that's the type of economic espionage that they're conducting. >> Well, those are the big four. If there were big five or six, I would presume US and some Western European countries would be on there. Do you track, I mean, where United States obviously has you know, people that are capable of this we're out doing our thing, and- >> So I think- >> That defense or offense, where do we sit in this matrix? >> Well, I think the big five would probably include eCrime. We also track India, Pakistan. We track actors out of Columbia, out of Turkey, out of Syria. So there's a whole, you know this problem is getting worse over time. It's proliferating. And I think COVID was also, you know a driver there because so many of these countries couldn't move human assets around because everything was getting locked down. As machine learning and artificial intelligence and all of this makes its way into the cameras at border and transfer points, it's hard to get a human asset through there. And so cyber is a very attractive, cheap and deniable form of espionage and gives them operational capabilities, not, you know and to your question about US and other kind of five I friendly type countries we have not seen them targeting our customers. So we focus on the threats that target our customers. >> Right. >> And so, you know, if we were to find them at a customer environment sure. But you know, when you look at some of the public reporting that's out there, the malware that's associated with them is focused on, you know, real bad people, and it's, it's physically like crypted to their hard drive. So unless you have sensor on, you know, an Iranian or some other laptop that might be target or something like that. >> Well, like Stuxnet did. >> Yeah. >> Right so. >> You won't see it. Right. See, so yeah. >> Well Symantec saw it but way back when right? Back in the day. >> Well, I mean, if you want to go down that route I think it actually came from a company in the region that was doing the IR and they were working with Symantec. >> Oh, okay. So, okay. So it was a local >> Yeah. I think Crisis, I think was the company that first identified it. And then they worked with Symantec. >> It Was, they found it, I guess, a logic controller. I forget what it was. >> It was a long time ago, so I might not have that completely right. >> But it was a seminal moment in the industry. >> Oh. And it was a seminal moment for Iran because you know, that I think caused them to get into cyber operations. Right. When they realized that something like that could happen that bolstered, you know there was a lot of underground hacking forums in Iran. And, you know, after Stuxnet, we started seeing that those hackers were dropping their hacker names and they were starting businesses. They were starting to try to go after government contracts. And they were starting to build training offensive programs, things like that because, you know they realized that this is an opportunity there. >> Yeah. We were talking earlier about this with Shawn and, you know, in the nuclear war, you know the Cold War days, you had the mutually assured destruction. It's not as black and white in the cyber world. Right. Cause as, as Robert Gates told me, you know a few years ago, we have a lot more to lose. So we have to be somewhat, as the United States, careful as to how much of an offensive posture we take. >> Well here's a secret. So I have a background on political science. So mutually assured destruction, I think is a deterrent strategy where you have two kind of two, two entities that like they will destroy each other if they so they're disinclined to go down that route. >> Right. >> With cyber I really don't like that mutually assured destruction >> That doesn't fit right. >> I think it's deterrents by denial. Right? So raising the cost, if they were to conduct a cyber operation, raising that cost that they don't want to do it, they don't want to incur the impact of that. Right. And think about this in terms of a lot of people are asking about would China invade Taiwan. And so as you look at the cost that that would have on the Chinese military, the POA, the POA Navy et cetera, you know, that's that deterrents by denial, trying to, trying to make the costs so high that they don't want to do it. And I think that's a better fit for cyber to try to figure out how can we raise the cost to the adversary if they operate against our customers against our enterprises and that they'll go someplace else and do something else. >> Well, that's a retaliatory strike, isn't it? I mean, is that what you're saying? >> No, definitely not. >> It's more of reducing their return on investment essentially. >> Yeah. >> And incenting them- disincening them to do X and sending them off somewhere else. >> Right. And threat actors, whether they be criminals or nation states, you know, Bruce Lee had this great quote that was "be like water", right? Like take the path of least resistance, like water will. Threat actors do that too. So, I mean, unless you're super high value target that they absolutely have to get into by any means necessary, then if you become too hard of a target, they're going to move on to somebody that's a little easier. >> Makes sense. Awesome. Really appreciate your, I could, we'd love to have you back. >> Anytime. >> Go deeper. Adam Myers. We're here at Fal.Con 22, Dave Vellante, Dave Nicholson. We'll be right back right after this short break. (bouncy music plays)

Published Date : Sep 21 2022

SUMMARY :

he is the Senior Vice Senior Vice President of Intelligence, so that we can inform our other products: So it's that threat hunting capability And so that's really at the core, And I infer that the intelligence that's the threat intel. the ECX you guys call it What are you learning from that? and positive about the end of the war. and before that you mentioned, you know, One of the big challenges. And it's also, you know, Tell us about, you know, So yeah, it starts off, you know and the longer we observe And it, you know is really part They need the cash. And that means that they need, you know, people that are capable of this And I think COVID was also, you know And so, you know, See, so yeah. Back in the day. in the region that was doing the IR So it was a local And then they worked with Symantec. It Was, they found it, I so I might not have that completely right. moment in the industry. like that because, you know in the nuclear war, you know strategy where you have two kind of two, So raising the cost, if they were to It's more of reducing their return and sending them off somewhere else. that they absolutely have to get into to have you back. after this short break.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

SymantecORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Adam MyersPERSON

0.99+

Bruce LeePERSON

0.99+

Adam MeyersPERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

FebruaryDATE

0.99+

2016DATE

0.99+

NATOORGANIZATION

0.99+

TurkeyLOCATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

IranLOCATION

0.99+

Robert GatesPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

SyriaLOCATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

11 vulnerabilitiesQUANTITY

0.99+

Ministry of State SecurityORGANIZATION

0.99+

World War IIEVENT

0.99+

ShawnPERSON

0.99+

CrowdStrikeORGANIZATION

0.99+

Kim Jong UnPERSON

0.99+

WednesdayDATE

0.99+

ColumbiaLOCATION

0.99+

IsraelLOCATION

0.99+

56 vulnerabilitiesQUANTITY

0.99+

Cold WarEVENT

0.99+

May of 21DATE

0.99+

ChristmasEVENT

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

24 different observablesQUANTITY

0.99+

late 1800sDATE

0.99+

ChinaORGANIZATION

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

People's Liberation Army Strategic Support ForceORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

185 threat actorsQUANTITY

0.98+

PresidentPERSON

0.98+

two peopleQUANTITY

0.98+

ChinaLOCATION

0.98+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.98+

RussiaORGANIZATION

0.98+

two entitiesQUANTITY

0.98+

ThanksgivingEVENT

0.98+

TuesdayDATE

0.98+

North KoreaORGANIZATION

0.98+

HollywoodORGANIZATION

0.98+

todayDATE

0.97+

Dow JonesOTHER

0.97+

ChineseOTHER

0.97+

11 of themQUANTITY

0.97+

eachQUANTITY

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.97+

IranORGANIZATION

0.96+

First oneQUANTITY

0.96+

30%QUANTITY

0.96+

POA NavyORGANIZATION

0.96+

StuxnetPERSON

0.95+

IsraeliOTHER

0.94+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.94+

180QUANTITY

0.94+

RussianOTHER

0.94+

USLOCATION

0.94+

Fal.Con 22EVENT

0.91+

fiveQUANTITY

0.9+

ARIAORGANIZATION

0.89+

United StatesLOCATION

0.89+

CrisisORGANIZATION

0.88+

North KoreansPERSON

0.87+

eCrimeORGANIZATION

0.85+

11 years ago yesterdayDATE

0.84+

few years agoDATE

0.84+

Marc Rouanne, DISH Network | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

>>Mhm. Hey, everyone, welcome back to the cubes. Continuous coverage of AWS Re Invent 2021. Live from Las Vegas. Lisa Martin with John Ferrier We have to live sets to remote studios over 100 guests on the Cube at this year's show and we're really excited to get to the next decade in cloud innovation and welcome from the keynote stage. Mark Ruin the Chief Network Officer Andy VPs Dish Network Mark, Welcome to the Cube. >>Thank you. >>Enjoyed your keynote this morning. So big news coming from AWS and dish you guys announced in the spring telecom industry First dish in AWS have formed a strategic collaboration to reinvent, reinvent five G connectivity and innovation. Let's let's really kind of dig into the AWS dish partnership. >>Yeah, you know, we're putting our network in the cloud, which allows us to have a different speed of innovation and a much more corroborative way of bringing new technology. And then we have access to all the developer ecosystem of AWS. So that's but as you say, it's a world first to put the telco in the cloud. >>And so the first time the five g network is going to be in the cloud, and it was also announced I'm curious, uh, that Las Vegas is going to be the first city live here. We are sitting in Las Vegas. What's the any status you can give us on >>that? So we're building across the US and Las Vegas is a place that we've built and we better testing. So that's where we have all run and we're testing all sorts of traffic and capability with our people and partners live here at the same time that we have the reinvent and, uh, Bianco around. We're also starting to test new capabilities like orchestration, slicing things that we've never seen any industry. So that's pretty exciting, I >>have to ask you. In the telecom industry, there has been an inflexion point around cloud and cloud Impact Ran is opening up new opportunities. What is the telecom industry getting and missing at the same time? Because it seems to be two schools of thought cloud pro cloud ran and then hold onto the old way. >>I think everybody would like to go to Iran and the cloud, but it's not as easy if you have a big installed base. So for us. You know, we all knew it. It's easy so we can adopt the best technology and the newest. But of course, if you have a big instal base, there is going to be a transformation, if you wish. So you know, people are starting trying to set the expectation of how much time it will take. But for us, you know we are. We're moving ahead because we're building a completely new network. >>It's a lot easier than well, it's a relative term. It's >>really much more fun. And we can We don't have to make compromises, right? So but it's still a lot of work, you know, we're discovering we're learning a lot of things. We're partners. >>What if you have a clean sheet of paper or Greenfield? What's the playbook to roll this out across the campus for a large geographic area? >>Yeah, so pretty much You have the same capability in terms of coverage and capabilities than anybody else, but we can do it in an automated manner. We can do it with much thinner and efficient hardware, pretty much hardware with a few accelerators, so a bit of jargon. But, you know, we just have access to a larger ecosystem and much more silicon and all the good things that are coming with the cloud >>talk to us about some of the unique challenges of five G that make running it in the cloud so much more helpful. And then also, why did you decide to partner with AWS? Clearly you have choice, but I'd love to know the backstory on that. >>Yeah, I've been in the telco industry forever, and I've always seen that our speed of innovation was to slow. The telco is very good at reliability. You know, your phone always works. Um, it's very reliable. You can have massive traffic, but the speed of innovation is not fast enough. And the the applications that are coming on the clouds are much faster. So what we wanted to marry is the reliability of the telco and and all the knowledge that exists with the speed of the cloud. And that's what we're doing with bringing their ecosystem into our ecosystem to get the best of two worlds. >>Lots of transformation in the vertical industries. We heard from Adam today on stage vertical with ai machine learning. How does that apply in the telco world because it's an edge you got. See, sports stadiums, for instance. You're seeing all kinds of home impact. How is vertical specialisation? >>Yeah. So what is unique about the cloud is that you can observe a lot of things, you know, in the cloud you have access to data, so you see what's happening, and then you use a lot of algorithms. We call it Machine Learning Analytics to make decisions. Now, for us, it means if you're a stadium, you're going to have a much better visibility of what's happening. Where is the traffic? You know, people moving in and moving out? Are they going to buy some food awards? So you see the traffic and you can adapt the way you steal the traffic the way you distribute video, the way you distribute entertainment to how people are moving because you can observe what is happening in the network, which you can't do in a classic or legacy five g network. So once you observe, you can have plenty of ideas, right? And you can start innovation again, mix a lot of things and offer new services. >>In this last 22 months, when we saw this rapid pivot to work from home. And now it's work from anywhere, right? We talk about hybrid cloud hybrid events here, but this hybrid work environment talk to me about the impact that that decision A W s are going to have on all of those companies and people who are going to be remote and working from the edge for maybe permanently. >>Yes, you say, You know what is important is that people want to have access to the to the cloud to the services, the enterprise from wherever they are. So as a software architect, I need to make sure that we can follow them and offer that service from wherever they are in a similar manner today. If you're making a phone call, you don't have to think if you're connecting to the Web, you know, through WiFi through this and that, you have to think we want to make it as simple as making a phone call. In the past, where you always connected, you always secured. You always have access to your data. So that's really the ambition we have. And, of course, with the new remote abbots, the video conferencing that's the perfect time to come with a new offer. >>And the Strand also is moving towards policy based. You mentioned understanding video and patterns. Having that differentiated services capability in real time is a big deal. >>Yeah, that's a big deal. Actually, what enterprise want? They want to manage their policy, so they want to decide what traffic gets, a premium access and what traffic can be put in the background. You want to update your computers? Maybe that's not a premium price for that. You can do it at any time, but you want to have real time, customer service and support. You want premium? And who am I to decide for an enterprise? Enterprises want to decide. So what we offer them is the tools to create their policy, and their policy will be a competitive advantage for them when they can different change. >>And this brings up another point. I want to ask you. You brought this up earlier about this. The ideas, the creativity that enables with cloud you mentioned ideas will come out. These are this is where the developers now can really encode. This is the whole theme of this Pathfinders keynote. You were up on stage. This is a real opportunity to add value. Doing all the heavy lifting in the top of the stack and enabling new use cases, new applications, new expectations. >>You know what I tell to my engineers? My dream as an engineer is to be, uh, developer friendly. I want people to come to us because it's fun to work in our environment and try things. And a lot of the ideas that developers will have won't work. But if they can spin it off very fast, they will move to that killer application of killer service very fast. So my job is to bring that to them so that it's very easy to consume and and trying to live And, you know, just like bringing >>candy to a baby here. >>Yeah, cause right And have fun and, uh, and discover it for yourself and decide for yourself. >>I gotta ask your questions in the Telecom for a while. We've been seeing on the Cube earlier in our intro keynote analysis that we're now living in an era with SAS applications. No more shelf where now, with purpose built applications that you're seeing now and horizontally scalable, vertically integrated machine learning. You can't hide the ball anymore around what's working. You can't put a project out there and say no, you can't justify. You can't put you can put lipstick on that. You can't know you're seeing on >>that bad cake. Yeah, it's all the point of beta testing and market adoption. You try, you put it there. It works. You say the brake doesn't work. You try again, right? That's the way it works. And and in Telco, you're right. We were cooking for a year or two years, Three years and saying, Oh, you know what? That's what you need. It doesn't work like this faster now. Yeah, Yeah. And people want to be able to influence and they want to say, I like it. I don't like it. And the market is deciding. >>Speaking of influence, one of the things we know we talk a lot about with A W S and their guests is their customer. First customer obsession focused. You know, the whole reason we're here is that is to serve the customer, talk to me about how customers and joint customers are influencing some of the design choices that you guys are making as you're bringing five due to the cloud. >>So what is important for us? We have to dreams, right? The first one is for consumers. We want consumers to have access to the network so that they feel that they are VIP and often I know you and I, sometimes when we're connected to the network with tropical, we don't get the feeling where a V i p So that's something that's a journey for us to make people feel like they get the service and the network is following them and caring about them for the enterprises. You want to let them decide what they want. You were talking about policy building. They want to come with their own rating engine. They want to come with their own geographical maps. Like here. I have traffic here. I don't need coverage. So we want to open up so that the enterprise decide how they invest, how they spend the money on the network >>giving control back to the end user. Whether that's a consumer or enterprise, >>absolutely giving control to the end user and the enterprises. And we're there to support and accelerate the service for them. >>Mark, I want to ask you about leadership. You mentioned all these new things. Are there your dreams? And it's happening Giving engineers the canvas to paint their own future. It's gonna be fun is fun as you're affecting that change. What can people do as leaders to create that momentum to bring the whole organisation along is their tricks of the trade. Is their best practises >>Absolutely their best practises? Um, we were very much following develops where, you know, as a leader, you don't know, you're just learning and you're exposing and you're sharing. Uh, we're also creating an open world where we're asking all our partners to be open. Sometimes, you know, they feel like a bit challenge. Like, do I want to show what I'm doing? And I would say, Yeah, sure, because you're benefiting between each other. Um, And then you want to give tools to your engineers and your marketers to be fast speed, speed, speed, speed so that they can just play and learn. And at the end of the day, you said it. It's all about fun. You know, if it's fun, it's easy to do >>that. We're having fun here. >>That is true. We always have fun here. Last question for you is talk about some of the things that AWS announced this morning. Lots of stuff going on in Adam's keynote. What excites you about this continued partnership between AWS and Dish? >>Yeah, we were. We were surprised and so happy about AWS answer to when we came in with the first one to come big time in the telco and the Cloud was not ready. To be honest, it was Enterprise and Data Club and AWS. When is going all the way, we've asked to transform their cloud to make it a telco frantic, loud. So we have a lot of discussions about networking, routing, service level agreements and a lot of things that are very technical. And there are a true partner innovating with us. We have a road map with ideas and that's pretty unique. So, great partner, >>I was going to say it sounds like a really true >>trust and partnership. We're sharing ideas and challenging each other all the time, so that's really great. >>Awesome and users benefit consumers Benefit enterprises benefit Mark Thank you for joining Joining me on the programme today. Georgia Keynote enjoyed hearing more about dish and AWS. And what are you doing to power? The future. We appreciate your time. >>Thank you. Thank you >>for John Ferrier. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the Cube? The global leader in tech coverage, So mhm. Yeah.

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

remote studios over 100 guests on the Cube at this year's show So big news coming from AWS and dish you guys announced So that's but as you say, it's a world first to put the telco in the cloud. And so the first time the five g network is going to be in the cloud, and it was also announced I'm curious, live here at the same time that we have the reinvent and, What is the telecom industry So you know, people are starting trying to set the expectation of how much time it It's a lot easier than well, it's a relative term. a lot of work, you know, we're discovering we're learning a lot of things. all the good things that are coming with the cloud And then also, why did you decide to partner with AWS? and and all the knowledge that exists with the speed of the cloud. How does that apply in the telco world because it's an edge you So you see the traffic and you can adapt the way you steal the traffic the way you distribute me about the impact that that decision A W s are going to have on all of those companies and people who are going In the past, where you always connected, you always secured. And the Strand also is moving towards policy based. You can do it at any time, but you want to have real time, customer service and support. the creativity that enables with cloud you mentioned ideas will come out. And a lot of the ideas that developers will have won't work. Yeah, cause right And have fun and, uh, and discover it for yourself and decide You can't put you can put lipstick on that. You say the brake doesn't work. Speaking of influence, one of the things we know we talk a lot about with A W S and their guests is You want to let them decide what they want. giving control back to the end user. the service for them. the canvas to paint their own future. And at the end of the day, We're having fun here. Last question for you is talk about some of the things that AWS When is going all the way, we've asked to transform their cloud to make it a telco frantic, We're sharing ideas and challenging each other all the time, And what are you doing to power? Thank you. The global leader

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Marc RouannePERSON

0.99+

John FerrierPERSON

0.99+

Mark RuinPERSON

0.99+

Three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

a yearQUANTITY

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

DISH NetworkORGANIZATION

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

MarkPERSON

0.99+

DishORGANIZATION

0.98+

first oneQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

IranLOCATION

0.98+

TelcoORGANIZATION

0.98+

two worldsQUANTITY

0.97+

two schoolsQUANTITY

0.97+

over 100 guestsQUANTITY

0.97+

AndyPERSON

0.96+

Chief Network OfficerPERSON

0.95+

Data ClubORGANIZATION

0.95+

first cityQUANTITY

0.95+

oneQUANTITY

0.95+

firstQUANTITY

0.94+

First dishQUANTITY

0.92+

EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.92+

AWS Re Invent 2021EVENT

0.9+

next decadeDATE

0.89+

first timeQUANTITY

0.84+

InventEVENT

0.83+

this morningDATE

0.83+

five gORGANIZATION

0.79+

last 22 monthsDATE

0.78+

CubeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.74+

Dish NetworkORGANIZATION

0.69+

this yearDATE

0.66+

Impact RanORGANIZATION

0.66+

KeynoteEVENT

0.63+

CubePERSON

0.61+

A W SORGANIZATION

0.59+

2021DATE

0.59+

LastQUANTITY

0.57+

five GQUANTITY

0.52+

PathfindersORGANIZATION

0.49+

GeorgiaLOCATION

0.46+

SASTITLE

0.38+

MachineORGANIZATION

0.36+

Google Cloud Announcements and Day 2 Show Wrap with DR | Cloud City Live 2021


 

>>Um, okay, thanks to the studio there for the handoff. Appreciate it. We're here for breaking news and it's exciting that we have who's the managing director. Google is breaking some hard news here, Dave. We want to bring him in and get commentary while we end up Dave too. Honestly, the story here is cloud city. We are in the cloud city and all, thanks for coming on remotely into our physical hybrid set here. Thanks for coming >>On. Thank you, John. And very excited to be here. What Juliet. >>Well, we got Bon Jovi ready to play. Everyone's waiting for that concert in the year. The only thing standing between bunch of LV and all the great stuff. So a lot of people watching. Thanks for coming on, sir. So you guys got some big news, um, first Erickson partners with you guys on 5g platform, deal with Anthem, as well as, uh, open ran Alliance. You guys are joining huge, a Testament to the industry. I see Google with all your innovation you guys have in the big three cloud hyperscalers. Obviously you guys invented SRE, so you know, you no stranger to large scale. What's the news. Let's tell us why this Erickson news is so important. Let's start with the Erickson announcement. >>Sure. So John, I mean, we are very excited today to finally bring to the market, the strategic partnership that we've been building with Erickson for the last few months, uh, the partnership to recent retreat, which is very important to the industry is you're actually doing this in conjunction with very large CSPs. So it's not been in isolation. You are in fact in the press release that we have already launched something to get the big telecom Italia in Italy, because you will see that also in the past. And really the partnership is on three pillars. Number one, how can CSBs monetize 5g and edge, which is the real team at the moment using Google clouds solutions like the edge computing platform and, and POS, and Erikson's cutting edge 5g components, 5g solutions. And if we can onboard these together at the CSP, such as telecom Italia, that creates massive pain to market efficiency. So that's 0.1 because speed and agility is key John, but then point to it also unlocks a lot of edge use cases for a bunch of verticals, retail, manufacturing, healthcare, so on, which are already starting to launch together with that. Excellent. And so that's the second pillar. And then the final pillar of course, is this continuously cloud native innovation that you just highlighted. John, we are going to try and double down on it between ourselves and Ericsson to really time created this cloud native application suite or 5g or whatever. >>Talk about the innovations around cloud, because the message we're hearing him this year at mobile world Congress, is that the public cloud is driving the innovation. And, you know, I can be a little bit over the top. So the telcos are slow. They're like glaciers, they move slow, but they're just moving packets. They are there. They're moving the network around. The innovation is happening on top. So there's some hardened operations operating the networks. Now you have a build concept cloud native enables that. So you've got containers. You can put that encapsulate that older technology and integrated in. So this is not a rip and replace. Someone has to die to win. This is a partnership with the tellers. Can you share your thoughts on that piece? >>Smart Antone's photo? We believe that it's a massive partnership opportunity. There's zero conflict or tensions in this sort of ecosystem. And the reason for that is when you talk about that containerization and right once and deploy everywhere type architecture that we are trying to do, that's where the cloud native really helps. Like when you create Ericsson 5g solutions with the operators, adjust telecom Italia, once you build a solution, you don't have to worry about, do I need to kick it back again and again, but every deployment, as long as your mantra, genetics and working, you shouldn't be able to have the same experience. >>Yeah, I'm John. I talk all the time in the cube about how developers are really going to drive the edge. You're clearly doing that with your distributed cloud, building out a telco cloud. I wonder if you could talk a little bit more about how you see that evolving. A lot of the AI that's done today is done in the cloud. A lot of modeling being done. When you think about edge, you think about AI inferencing, you think about all these monetization opportunities. How are you thinking about that? >>So I think David, first of all, it's a fan best six Sigma in how we are looked in at analytics at the edge, right? So we, uh, we have realized that is a very, very, uh, uh, uh, data computing, heavy operation. So certainly the training of the models is still going to stay in cloud for the foreseeable future. But the influencing part that you mentioned is there something that we can offer to the edge? Why is that so important in the pandemic era, think of running a shop or a factory floor, completely autonomously meeting zero minimal human intervention. And if you want to look at an assembly line and look at AI influencing as a way to find out assembly line defects on products in manufacturing, that's very difficult problem to solve unless you actually create those influencing models at the edge. So creating that ecosystem of an Erickson and a Google cloud carrier gives you that edge placement of the workloads that would fit right next to our factory floor in our manufacturing example. And then on top of that, you could run that AI influence thing to really put in the hands of the manufacturer, a visual inspection capability to just bring this to life. >>Great. Thank you for that. And now the other piece of the announcement of course, is the open, open ran. We've been talking about that all weekend and you know, you well, remember when cloud first came out, people were concerned about security. Of course. Now everybody's asking the question, can we still get the reliability and the security that we're used to with the telcos? And of course over time we learned that you guys actually pretty good at security. So how do you see the security component, maybe first talk about the open ran piece, why that's important and how security fits? >>Sure. So first of all, open trend is something that we have taken great interest in the last year or so as it started evolving. And the reason for that is fairly simple. Dave, this aggregation of networks has been happening for some time in the radio layer. We believe that's the final frontier of sort of unlocking and dis-aggregating that radio layer. And why is it so important? 80% of the operators spend globally is on radio. 80% is on radio. If you disaggregate that. And if the internet synergies for your CSP partners and clients, that meant you have standard purpose hardware standard for software with open interfaces, number one, massive difference in VCO. Number two, the supply chain gets streamlined and become still really, really simple way to manage a fairly large distribution. That's about to get larger in 5g and the capital clarity that 5g needs. >>You're thinking of tens of thousands of micro cells and radio cells going everywhere. And having that kind of standardized hardware software with openings of Essex is an extremely important cost dimension to every new site finished that the reason we got to exact open brand was you can now run for a lot of API APIs on the radio net, cetera, that then certainly brings a whole developer community on the radio later. That then helps you do a bunch of things like closed loop automation for network optimization, as well as potentially looking at monetization opportunities by hyper personalizing, yours and mine experiences at the waist level from the self-doubt. And so that really is what is driving us towards this open grind paper. Come on, we go and >>Got a minute and a half. I want to get your thoughts real quick on, on open source and the innovation. Um, Danielle Royston, who's the CEO of telco, Dr. She's at a keynote today. And she mentioned that the iPhone 14 years ago was launched. Okay. And you think about open and you mentioned proprietary with the 5g and having Iran be more commodity and industry standard. That's going to lower the costs increase the surface here of infrastructure. Everyone wins because everyone wants more connectivity options. Software is going to be the key to success for the telco industry. And open source is driving. That is Android. The playbook that you guys pioneered, obviously at Google with the smart phones was very successful. How is that a playbook or an indicator to what could happen at telecom? >>Absolutely. John and the parallel and analogy that you raised is photon. Be believed in the telco world and tossed multi cloud as a unifying software development layer. The app development platform is the way that people will start to drive this innovation, whether it's radio or whether it's in the core or whether it's on the side of pups, same software planning, everywhere that really allows you that whole development models that we are familiar with, but on the telecom side. And that's where we are seeing some massive innovation opportunities for systems to come on board. >>That's great stuff. And I was just heard someone in the hallway just yesterday and say, you want to be the smartphone. You don't want to be the Blackberry going forward. That's pretty much the consensus here at mobile world Congress. I'm all. Thank you for coming on and sharing the hard news and Google regulations on the Erickson Anthem platform, a deal as well as the open Ranton Alliance. Uh, congratulations. Good to see you. And by the way, you'll be keynoting tomorrow on the cube featured segment. So >>Watch that in there. Thank you, John. Thank you. Glad >>To be here. Benching director telecom, industry, solicitor, Google, obviously player. He's managing that business. Big opportunities for Google because they have the technology. They got the chops, Dave, and we're going to now bring this Daniel. Russia says here when to bring up on the stage, Bon Jovi is about to go on behind us Bon Jovi's here. And this is like a nightclub, small intimate setting here in cloud city. Dave Bon. Jovi's right there. He's going to come on stage after we close down here, but first let's bring up the CEO of telco. Dr. And yeah, it was great to see she's hot off the keynote. We're going to see you to Mike. Great to see you. Oh, it's great to be there. We're going to see you tomorrow for an official unpacking of the keynote, but thanks for coming by and closing, >>Swinging by. I never closed down the show. It's been a big, it's been a big day-to-day at MWC and in cloud city, really starting to get packed. I mean, everyone's coming in the band's warming up. You can kind of hear it. Um, I think Elon Musk is about to go on as well. So I mean, it's really happening all the buzz about cloud city out there in the hallway. Yeah. Yeah, no, I mean, I think everyone's talking about it. I'm really, really excited with how it's going. >>Well, this is awesome. While we got you here, we want to put you to work being the cube analyst for the segment. You just heard Google. Uh, we broke them in for a breaking news segment. So hard news Erickson partnership. We're in the factory, former Erickson booth. They're not even here, it's now the Calco VR booth, but that's a relation. And then open ran again, open source, you got five G you got open source all happening. What's your take on this? >>You see, you know, there's two big. And I, I talked about it, my keynote this morning, and there's two big technological changes that are happening in our industry simultaneously. And I don't think we could have had it MWC 21. I certainly wanted to make it about the public cloud. I think I'm sort of successful in doing that. And I think the other piece is open ramp, right? And I think these two big shifts are happening and, um, I'm really thrilled about it. And so, yeah, >>Well I loved your keynote. We were here, live. Chloe was here filling in for Dave while David was going to do some research and some breaking stories to you are on stage. And we were talking well, he's like, there's trillions of dollars, John on the table. And I was making the point, the money is at the middle of the table and it's changing hands if people don't watch it. And then you onstage that this trillions of dollars, this is a real competitive shift with dollars on the table. And you've got cultural collision. You got operators and builders trying to figure out it feels like dev ops is coming in here. Yeah. I mean, what's the, what's the holistic vibe. What's >>The, yeah, I think my message is about, we can use the software and specifically the software, the public cloud to double your ARPU without massive cap X expenditure. And I think the CSPs is always viewed to get the increase in ARPU. I got to build out the network. I got to spend a lot of money. And with these two technologies that require might be dropped. And then in exchange for doubling our poo, why not? We should do that. Absolutely. >>You know, your message has been pretty clear that you got to get on, on the wave that arrived the way you're going to become driftwood. As John said yesterday. And I think it's pretty, it's becoming pretty clear that that's the case for the telcos. I feel like Danielle, that they were entering this decade, perhaps with a little bit more humility than they have in the past. And then, you know, maybe, especially as it relates to developers, we're just talking about building out the edge. We always talk about how developers are really going to be a key factor in the edge. And that's not a wheelhouse necessarily. It's obviously they're going to have to partner for that to have going to have to embrace cloud native. I mean, it's pretty clear that your premise is right on it. We'll see how long it takes, but if it, if they don't move fast, you know, what's going to happen. Well, I >>Think you look at it from the enterprise's perspective. And I think we just heard Google talking about it. We need to provide a tech stack that the enterprises can write to now, historically they haven't had this opportunity historically that CSPs have provided it. Now you're going to be able to write against Google's tech stack. And that's something that is documented. It's available. There's developers out there that know it. Um, and so I think that's the big opportunity and this might be the big use case that they've been looking for with 5g and looking forward to 16th. And so it's a huge opportunity for CSS. >>I think that's an important point because you got to place bets. And if I'm betting on Google or Amazon, Microsoft, okay. Those are pretty safe bets, right. Those guys are going to be around. >>I mean, they're like, no, don't trust the hyperscalers. I'm like, um, are you guys nuts? If they're safe, right. Safe >>Bets in terms of your investment in technology, now you got to move fast. Yeah. That's the other piece of it. You've got to change your business model. >>Well, you gotta be in the right side of history too. I mean, I mean, what is trust actually really mean? The snowflake trust Amazon, it sure did to get them where they are. Um, but now that's a >>Great example, John. It really is because there's a company that can move fast, but at the same time they compete with the same time they add incremental value. And so yeah, >>Here, the, you can see the narrative like, oh no, we're partnering telcos. Aren't bad. No one needs to die to bring in the new containers. Do we'll help them manage that operational legacy. But if they don't move, they're going to have an asset. That'll get rolled up into a SPAC or some sort of private equity deal. And because the old model of building cap backs and extract rents is kind of shifting because the value shifting. So to me, I think this is what we're watching still kind of unknown. Danielle Love to get your thoughts on this because if the value shifts to services, which is a consumption model like cloud, yeah. Then you can, don't have to try and extract the rents out of the cap ex >>Yeah. I don't think you need to own the entire stack to provide value. And I think that's where we are today in telco, right there. I mean, nuts and bolts of the stack, the servers, you know, the cabling, everything. And I'm like, stand on the shoulders of these amazing tech giants that have solved, you know, mega data centers, right. Huge data centers at scale, and just leverage their, their investment and uh, for your own benefit, it starts to focus. And we heard, um, all talking about it starts to focus on your subscriber and driving a great experience for us. Right? Yeah. Well, you're >>Talking about that many times they can do, but you're right. If the conversation hasn't has to go beyond, okay, we're just conductivity. It's gotta be ongoing and be like, oh, it's $10 a month for roaming charges. Ah, great. Yeah. Tick that box, right? It's those value added services that you're talking about and it's an infinite number of those that can be developed. And that's where the partnerships come in a creativity in the industry. It's just >>A blank piece of paper for, well, we, you know, everyone thinks Google knows everything about you, right. We've had the experience on our phone where they're serving of ads and you're like, how did you write Facebook? But you know, who knows more about us than, than Google or your mother, even your telco, you take your phone with you everywhere. Right? And so it's time to start unlocking all of that knowledge and using it to provide >>A really great, by the way, congratulations on the CEO to Toby and the investment a hundred million dollars. That's a game changer statement again, back to the billing. And there's a good, there's a whole new chain, even all up and down the stack of solutions, great stuff. And I want to unpack that tomorrow. I don't hold that. We're going and we're going to meet tomorrow. I want, I wanna want to leave that to stay >>In the data for a second, because you made the point before in your keynote as well. That it's, that it's the data that drives the value of these companies. Why is it that apple, Amazon, Google Facebook now trillion dollar evaluations. It's all about the data and the telcos have the data, but they can't figure out how to turn that into valuation. >>There's two parts of the data problem, which is number one, the data is trapped in on-premise siloed systems that are not open. You can't connect them and they certainly can't do without. And we talked about it, I think yesterday, you know, millions of dollars of expenditure. And I think the other piece that's really interesting is that it's not connected to a mechanism to get it out in a timely manner, right? This is data that's aging by the minute. And when it takes you weeks to get the insight it's useless. Right? And so to Togi we announced the launch to Togi, I'll get a little to Tokyo plug in there, right. To Toby is connecting that insight to the charger, to the engagement engine and getting it out to subscribers. I think that's the beginning of this connection. I think it's a hard problem to solve and would have been solved already. >>But I think the key is leveraging the public cloud to get your data out of on-premise and, and mashing it up against these great services that Google and Azure and Amazon provides to drive it into the hands of the subscriber, make it very actionable, very monetizeable right at the end, that's what they want. More ARPU, more revenue. Right. And you know, we heard some keynotes from GSA yesterday, some big, big guys, you know, talking about how, you know, it's not fair that these other communication platforms are not regulated. You know, telco is heavily regulated and they're like, it's not fair. And I'm like, yep. It's not fair. That's like right. South complaining about it and start treating your customers better. So they are, they're happy to give you more. >>Yeah. And I think that's the message about the assets do, um, well, one thing I will say is this mobile world Congress is that we've been having a lot of fun here in cloud city. I have to ask you a personal question. Have you been having fun? You look great on the keynote of spring to your staff, cloud cities. Beautiful. Spectacular here. Give us some highlights, personal highlights from your trip. So far, >>Number one, I'm, I'm psyched that the keynote is delivered and, and done. I mean, I think it takes my blood pressure down a blind, um, you know, the spring in my step, I wore these fun little tennis shoes and, and that was really fun, but yeah, I'm having, I'm having, I think a lot of things, great conversations. Yes. The attendance has reduced, um, you know, usually you see hundreds of people from the big group carriers, especially the European groups and yeah, the attendance is reduced, but the senior guys are here, right. The senior leadership teams are in the booth or having meetings, running amazing conversations. I think the last year we really did live a decade in one year. I think they woke up to the power of the public cloud. I mean, there was no way that they got business done without cloud based tools. And I think the light bulb went off, I think I'm right in the right moment. Awesome. Do you think that, >>Do you think that they'd think in there, like left money on the table because you look at the pandemic, there were three categories of companies, losers, people who held the line struggled and then winners. Yeah. Big time tailwind booming. Obviously the zooms of the world telcos did well. They were up and running. Uh, this, this was good. You think we might've left some money on the table? They could have done more. >>Yeah. I think the ones that were, you know, people talk about digital transformation where digital telco we're digitally enabled, but I think the pandemic really tested this. Right. Can you deliver a contactless SIM or do you need to go to a store in person to get to go pick it up? And I had a broken SIM during the pandemic. My provider made me go to the store and I'm like, is it even open? And so I heard other stories of telcos that were very digitally enabled, right. They were using Uber to deliver Sims, all sorts of fun, crazy stuff and new ideas. And they were able to pivot right. Agile. And so I think, I think that was a really big telemedicine booming. So >>If you were in a digital business during the pandemic in general, you're out of business maybe unless you were telco, but I think you're right. I think the light bulb went off. It was an aha moment. And they said, oh, if >>We don't, I mean, I am not kidding. Right. As an ex CEO where I was trying to collect signatures on renewals, right. Here's a DocuSign, which for the world is like, duh. I mean, our school uses DocuSign. I had telcos that required an in-person signature, right. In some country once a month on Tuesday between 10 and two. And I'm like, how are you doing business? Like that? That's like the dark ages. >>Yeah. This is where the crypto guys got it right. With know your customer. Right. >>Because they have the data. Well, there's a lot of things that come in wrong. We don't want to get the whole show on that, but then you have great to have you drop biopsy Bon Jovi's here. How did you get Bon Jovi? Huge fan, New Jersey boy Patriots fan. We'd love it. Well, >>Yeah. I mean, who doesn't love Bon Jovi. Right. Um, we knew we wanted a rocker, right. Rock and roll is all about challenging the status quo. Um, that, I mean, since the beginning and that's what we're doing here, right. We're really challenging. Like the way things have been done in telco kind of just shattering the glass ceiling and lots of different ways. Right. Calling the old guys dinosaurs. I'm sure those guys love me. Right. I mean, how much do they hate me right now? Or they're like that girl? Oh, we're punk >>Rock. They're rock and roll. Right, right. I mean, maybe we should have gotten the clash >>Right. Black flag. Right. I'm a little bit old. >>Accessible. Still >>Edgy. Yeah. So really excited to get them here. Um, I've met him before. Um, and so hopefully he'll remember me. It's been a couple of years since I've seen him. So can't wait to connect with him again. I think we have Elon Musk coming up and that's going to be, it's always exciting to hear that guy talk. So >>Yeah, it could be inspiration off after you've talked to space, space X and kind to star lake. >>Right. I mean, those guys are launching rockets and deploying satellites. And >>I think that's really interesting for >>Rural right. In telco. Right. Being able to deploy very quickly in rural where the, maybe the cost, um, you know, per gig doesn't make sense. You know, the cost for deployment of tower. I think, I mean, that's an interesting idea right there. It's exciting. It's exciting. >>He's inspirational. I think a lot of people look at the younger generation coming into this issue. Why are we doing things? A lot of people are questioning and they see the cloud. They're saying, oh, Hey, you're a B, why are we doing this? This is such an easier, better way. Yeah. I think eventually the generation shifts >>It's coming. I'm so excited to be a part of it. Yeah. Great, >>Great leadership. And I want to say that you are real innovative, glad to have us here and presenting with you here. >>Awesome team. I'm psyched to have you guys. We talked last night about how great this partnership has said. Yeah. >>Cuba's keep us rocking inside the cloud city. The streets of the city are packed in here. All stuff. Great stuff. Thanks for coming on. Thanks. Bon Jovi is here. We've got a shot. A bunch of we do we have a screenshot of Bon Jovi? Yup. There it is. Okay. He's about to come on stage and uh, we're gonna take a break here. We're gonna take and send it back to Adam and the team in the studio. Thanks guys.

Published Date : Jul 6 2021

SUMMARY :

We are in the cloud city and all, thanks for coming on remotely So you guys got some big news, um, first Erickson partners with you guys on 5g platform, And so that's the second pillar. And, you know, And the reason for that is I wonder if you could talk a little bit But the influencing part that you mentioned is And now the other piece of the announcement of course, is the open, open ran. And the reason for that is fairly simple. And having that kind of standardized hardware software with openings of Essex is an extremely important cost And she mentioned that the iPhone John and the parallel and analogy that you raised is photon. And I was just heard someone in the hallway just yesterday and say, you want to be the smartphone. Watch that in there. We're going to see you to Mike. I mean, everyone's coming in the band's warming up. And then open ran again, open source, you got five G you And I don't think we could have had it MWC 21. and some breaking stories to you are on stage. And I think the CSPs is always viewed to get the increase in ARPU. And I think it's pretty, it's becoming pretty clear that that's the case for the telcos. And I think we just heard Google talking about it. I think that's an important point because you got to place bets. I'm like, um, are you guys nuts? You've got to change your business model. Well, you gotta be in the right side of history too. And so yeah, And because the old model of building cap backs and extract I mean, nuts and bolts of the stack, the servers, If the conversation hasn't has to go beyond, And so it's time to start unlocking And I want to unpack In the data for a second, because you made the point before in your keynote as well. I think yesterday, you know, millions of dollars of expenditure. But I think the key is leveraging the public cloud to get your data out of on-premise and, I have to ask you a personal question. And I think the light bulb went off, Do you think that they'd think in there, like left money on the table because you look at the pandemic, there were three And I had a broken SIM during the pandemic. I think the light bulb went off. And I'm like, how are you doing business? With know your customer. show on that, but then you have great to have you drop biopsy Bon Jovi's here. Rock and roll is all about challenging the status quo. I mean, maybe we should have gotten the clash I'm a little bit old. I think we have Elon Musk coming up and that's going I mean, those guys are launching rockets and deploying satellites. maybe the cost, um, you know, per gig doesn't make sense. I think a lot of people look at the younger generation coming into this issue. I'm so excited to be a part of it. And I want to say that you are real innovative, glad to have us I'm psyched to have you guys. He's about to come on stage and uh, we're gonna take a break here.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavidPERSON

0.99+

Danielle RoystonPERSON

0.99+

EricksonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

MikePERSON

0.99+

appleORGANIZATION

0.99+

ItalyLOCATION

0.99+

EricssonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DanielPERSON

0.99+

ChloePERSON

0.99+

BlackberryORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

Bon JoviPERSON

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

second pillarQUANTITY

0.99+

two partsQUANTITY

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

DaniellePERSON

0.99+

Elon MuskPERSON

0.99+

AndroidTITLE

0.99+

JoviPERSON

0.99+

two technologiesQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

Dave BonPERSON

0.99+

GSAORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

TobyPERSON

0.99+

trillions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

14 years agoDATE

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

three pillarsQUANTITY

0.97+

one yearQUANTITY

0.97+

tens of thousandsQUANTITY

0.97+

New JerseyLOCATION

0.97+

Juha Korhonen | Cloud City Live 2021


 

>>Okay. We're back here at the cube. We're in the middle of all the action at mobile world. Cause we're in cloud city, uh, physically in onset here, we got the virtual space. People are watching remotely. We do a remote interviews, but now we're in person with. Who's the transformational leader, head of innovation in his previous Zane telecom, 50 million customers, big projects. You've seen it all, you know, you know all about the operators and you know about innovation. Those are two great topics that we're going to talk about. Thanks for coming on. Thank you. Thank you for having me. So we were talking about on the open, uh, with Chloe this morning about the difference between building and operating and operators. Technically it's in the definition of running large networks, but now the change is here. You've got cloud scale, you've got edge developing with 5g, open, ran for standardization and off the shelf equipment that will give more infrastructure surface area, which will bring more innovation. A lot of change, a lot of build-out. This is a mindset change you want to it's like war time, peace time. It's not a mature market. It's a growing turbulent opportunity and the trillions of dollars at stake. And, um, >>I, I believe that we as humans on anything that we do so much of our learning comes from doing, and whatever you do is what you learn. So what have we, as an operator's been doing, we have been buying things. So our learning has been on procurement, how to do a business casing, how to get approvals, but not necessarily how to really introduce something new to our customers. And what has, what has said to us as an industry is that all the innovation and there's been a lot of innovation on communication space has been done either by the handset people or has been done by the internet people, but not so much as some operators. So I think that's really something that you have to have to change, but you have to change what you learn. You have to change how you actually do it. >>It's interesting. You know, I'm very pro telecom, but people think I'm, I'm not because I tend to criticize and pontificate around the change. But if you look at the telecon, it's been a bunch of dumb pipes and that's been a good thing and it's been reliable. We've had great connectivity growth. The internet was stable during the pandemic. It literally saved people's lives and change things that we survived and it worked great. But now when you have applications and infrastructure as code, new opportunities are going to be forcing that change quicker. So it's not so much, it needs to radically change. It just needs to get more versatile, more >>Get on the >>Program. So if you look what has happened on other industries, WhatsApp, how the internet payers do it, how does apple do it? How does Google do it? How does Facebook do it? They are using these new technologies. They are using cloud first approaches. They are building huge scale and they able to innovate. So the way I'm looking at it, that you guys are an operator you need to get on the program. And it's not, it's not the question. Should I do it? Should I not do it? Question is how do you do it? It's not the question when you should do it, you should do it. Now, the question is, how do you do it? How do you get started? I think, no, I think >>You're exactly right. It's in the here and now we're going to have a exclusive Google news conference later in the day, but you've mentioned the cloud players. If you look at the success of say Android, Android is a great use case that I think might be something that you can look at to the telecom industry and say, Hmm, how open source software changed the handset business? I think there's kind of a movement here in the telco space. And this ecosystem where you hear open, you got the Linux foundation participated with the software group for Iran. You got other things happening with open gardens, not walled gardens. Interesting. What's your take on how the, the innovation from the software side might come in here because you want to preserve the legacy operational stability, but bringing in new >>For you to be able to do a new, you need to have those software skills, because that's how the new things happen. You have to build them, you have to program them. But then the, then the issue is that your organization, most likely something good for this. So you don't have the designers. You don't have the software engineers, you don't have, uh, how to do customer experience, how to do, how to do the planning. You don't have it. So then the, then the challenge is how are you going to do that? And I'm a big saver off of operators starting to build some of the internal teams, have them separate teams and have them start to trial on these things. Give don't be so hard on yourself, allow yourself to try and try. Some things, allow yourself to fail. Don't make them huge programs because then the failure becomes a huge issue also. And then once you learn, once you know how to do it, then scale it up. But yes, these new skills software, you have to do it. And open is very well. >>You know, we were talking yesterday about this new world where feature creep used to be a bad thing. But now with cloud scale, you can develop rapid features quickly and get data and then abandon those things quickly. The time to do that is now part of the development process. So as software changes, you're starting to see the human resources configurations, where teams are formed differently. What's your take on this? Because end to end workloads can have multiple layers on an SRE, an operator, a developer, and a UX person, all on one team. I >>Agree. And I think that, and this is not something we have to invent as a telecom industry. Let's just go look at what the software guys are doing, right? So for decades, over the better part of a decade, there have been having HR teams. They're having the actual, working more working on sprains. All the tools already exist. All it's, it's all available for us. So all we have to do is just look at how they are doing that and start to use some of those practices and on our business. And by the way, we have been trying, this is not very good at it because we tend to kind of take it to the previous way of doing patients. And then we get ourselves into trouble. You know, >>It's the classic old playbook. We're good at procuring things. We know how to get that email, checking the list, done cost efficiency, drive more revenue chip away at it, moved the ball down the field slowly. Now the new playbook is agility, software economics, software playbook. So I have to ask you on, on that piece of it, how do you think the operators are psychologically right now? Are they, are they have a frog in boiling water? Do they know what's happening? Are they open to it? Or they just need more repetition? What's the psychology of the, with the progress and the progress bar of the operators relative to the trends. >>I think they might be a little bit desperate, right? So also telecom people. I like to think they're relatively smart people. They are not dummies. They know what they are doing, but th there's 30 years of history, maybe more and there's large organizations, maybe thousands of people who are, who are, who they have to work with. So somehow you have to have to figure out how do you get these new skills? And, and we're getting older. Also. I was in 1995, working for telecom. TSM standard loans. We were young at that point. I'm not young anymore. >>So this is your whole experience. I appreciate that. Well, >>I mean, old is good because now if you look at, I mean, I would, again, not to bring up ageism, but um, young, young guns, they never really loaded a Linux operating system before they never really wired splice cable. Um, and also there's also the systems thinking. And I think one of the things that's coming out of this show, that's clear to us here at the cube is if you're a systems thinker you tend to do well because the edge Springs distributed computing to the table. So, you know, I think this experience collision with the young talent. Yeah. >>And I had a, a program where I actively wanted to bring new talent into the organization. We didn't want to hire it. As people have five to 10 years of working experience. Now let's give us some guys fresh out of the college. It's fine. We have plenty of telecom knowledge. We can teach them no issues, but we need some of the newer more, more open-minded approaches to what we can do. It's >>Funny, mark Zuckerberg said once years ago, it's a young man's game, a young person's game. And we were all like, yeah, screw you. But the point was is that now he looked at all the best players. Amazon has Gosling over there. A lot of these pioneers in the computing industry and the telecom industry are now leaders on the new architecture because there's an architectural change over, but it's not a rip and replace. It's a net abstraction. So it's not like it's going away. So the skills are there. So how do you talk about that? Because this is the big, an untold story, this new arc and architectural shift or tweak, uh, >>On architecture side. I think we, as an operators, we are really focused on building the networks and our networks started site. It's all about standard, uh, days. And it's all about buying buying boxes. And unfortunately, a lot of our leaders are then coming, growing up on that thinking. So then they trying to do the same thing on software side and it just doesn't work. So software is a totally different animal. So I think you need to really have a different mindset, different way of looking at that. When you start to get on the software side of business and how do you do your architectures? You need to have this flexibility. TSMA is a standard that evolves in a 10 year cycle. Your software architecture can evolve and 10, 10 year cycle. It has to move faster than that >>While you've used it to our ears. You're definitely come back on the cube. We're going to have you back because this is the most important story in this industry is the software paradigm. Um, and our minutes that we have left, why have you here, what do you think of the show? Mobile world Congress, uh, speeds and feeds radios boxes. Now you got chips software. What does this show turning into? What is this about? >>I think it's amazing to start to see this year. What, because of the COVID a lot of the old players are not here. So suddenly that space has been filled more of a newer company. It's different kinds of things. And I think that's really important for this conference. I think it's really important for the industry and it's really good for all of us. It's nice to see something, something new, something, something else, >>Another team of >>Edge brings up education, health care, societal change, cyber defenses, peace and challenges >>With that. Also security and how to control. And yeah, I >>Mean, a lot of people were watching people participating so well. Great to have you on great expertise and congratulations on your new role as a transformation leader in Washington, DC. And again, Nate, we need you there. So did you get up there on the hill and help educate some of those, uh, leaders that need to write the new laws? Thank you very much. Thank you for having me. Okay. We are here in the cube. We're breaking down all the action here at the middle of cloud city. I'm John from the cube. David lump is on assignment. I'm gonna send it back to the studio, Adam.

Published Date : Jun 29 2021

SUMMARY :

You've seen it all, you know, you know all about the operators and So I think that's really something that you have to have to change, But if you look at the telecon, it's been a bunch of dumb pipes and that's been a good thing and So the way I'm looking at it, that you guys are an operator you need to get on the program. Android is a great use case that I think might be something that you can look at to the telecom industry and say, You have to build them, you have to program them. But now with cloud scale, you can develop rapid features quickly and get data and then abandon those So for decades, over the better part of a decade, So I have to ask you on, on that piece of it, how do you think the operators are psychologically So somehow you have to have to figure out how do you get these new So this is your whole experience. And I think one of the things that's coming out of this show, that's clear to us here at the cube is if you're a systems of the college. So how do you talk about that? So I think you need to really have a different mindset, different way of looking at that. We're going to have you back because this is the most important I think it's amazing to start to see this year. Also security and how to control. Great to have you on great expertise

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

NatePERSON

0.99+

Juha KorhonenPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

David lumpPERSON

0.99+

1995DATE

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

30 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Washington, DCLOCATION

0.99+

ChloePERSON

0.99+

appleORGANIZATION

0.99+

10QUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

LinuxTITLE

0.99+

AndroidTITLE

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

WhatsAppORGANIZATION

0.98+

pandemicEVENT

0.98+

Zane telecomORGANIZATION

0.98+

mark ZuckerbergPERSON

0.98+

LinuxORGANIZATION

0.98+

trillions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

50 million customersQUANTITY

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

one teamQUANTITY

0.95+

two great topicsQUANTITY

0.95+

thousands of peopleQUANTITY

0.93+

this yearDATE

0.92+

first approachesQUANTITY

0.92+

this morningDATE

0.91+

2021DATE

0.89+

Cloud City LiveTITLE

0.88+

Mobile world CongressEVENT

0.86+

once years agoDATE

0.85+

decadesQUANTITY

0.82+

TSMATITLE

0.8+

IranLOCATION

0.79+

COVIDEVENT

0.75+

GoogleEVENT

0.59+

SpringsORGANIZATION

0.45+

GoslingPERSON

0.38+

Aaron Chaisson, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2021


 

>>Welcome back everyone to Dell Technologies World 2021 the virtual version. You're watching the cubes continuing coverage of the event and we're gonna talk about the Edge, the transformation of telco in the future of our expanding tech universe. With me is Aaron Jason, who's the vice president? Edge and Telkom marketing at Dell Technologies erin great to see you. I love this topic. >>Absolutely. It's it's pretty popular these days. I'm glad to be here with you. Thanks. >>It is popular, you know, cloud was kind of the shiny new toy last decade and it's still growing at double digits but it's kind of mainstream and now the Edge is all the rage. What's the best way to think about? What is the Edge? How do you define that? >>Yeah, you know, that's probably one of the most common questions I get is we start really doubling down on what we're doing it in the Edge world today. Um you know, I tried to basically not overcomplicated too much, you know, last year we really tried to to talk about it as being where you're the physical world, in the virtual world, connect. Um but you know, really it's more about what customers are looking to do with that technology. And so what we're really thinking about it today is the edges really where customers data is being used near point of generation to really define and build the essential value for that customer and that essential value is gonna be different in each vertical in each industry. Right? So in manufacturing, that essential value is created in the factory and retail, it's going to be, you know, at point of sale, whether that's in a store or on your device, in a virtual interaction, um in health care, it's going to be the point of care, Right? So it's gonna be the ambulance or the emergency room or the radiology lab. and of course in farming that essential values created in the field itself. So um, you know, for for many customers, it's really trying to figure out, you know, how do they take technology closer to the point of that value creation to be able to drive new new capabilities for the business, whether it's for what they're trying to accomplish or what they're trying to do in helping their customers. So really that's how we're thinking about the edge today. It's where that value generation occurs for a company. And how do we take technology to that point of generation to deliver value for them? >>Yeah, I like that. I mean to me the edge, I know what it's not, I know the edges, not a mega data center, but but everything else could be the edge. I mean, it's it's to me it's the place that's the most logical, the most logical place to process the data. So as you say, it could be a factory, it could be a hospital, it could be a retail store, it could be, could be a race track, it could be a farm, I mean virtually anything. So the edges, it's always been here, but it's changing. I mean most of the edge data has historically been analog. Everything now is getting instrumented. What are the factors that you think will make this, this industry's vision of the edge real in your opinion? >>Yeah. You know, it's it's really bringing together a handful of technologies that have really started to mature after over the last decade or so. Um the ones that have been around for a little bit, things like IOT have been emerging in the last several years. Um even Ai and machine learning many of those algorithms have been around for decades, but we've only recently been able to bring the compute power required to do that in edge environments in the last decade or so. Um it's so really the two key sort of killer technologies that have matured in the last couple of years is really the mic realization of computing. So being able to put compute almost anywhere on the planet and then the emergence of five G networking, giving us the ability to provide very high performance, low latency and high bandwidth environments to connect all those things together and get the data to those analytics environments. From that computer perspective. I mean, I still like to talk about moore's law as an example of that that ever marched that's been going on for, you know, half a century or more now is continuing to push forward um at a rate that is that that that that just really hasn't slowed down for the most part, you know, the example that I use with people, as, you know, you know, I still remember when I got my first calculator watch as a kid, you know, that Casio calculator watch that so many of us had, And my dad told me the story when he gave it to me, he's like, Hey, look, this has the same amount of compute power as the landing module on the moon, and I didn't know it at the time, but that was my first sort of entry and education around what Moore's law provided. And it's not so much speed. I mean, people think about that as it doubles in speed every 18 months, but it's really more about the density of compute that happens that moore's law drought, pushes along, so I can now squish more and more compute power into a smudge smaller location and I can now take that performance out to the edge in a way that I haven't been able to do before. I mean I think about my history, I joined E M C, that was acquired by Dell Technologies a couple years back. I joined that back in the late nineties when the biggest baddest storage array on the planet was one whole terabyte in size. And now I can fit that in the palm of my hand. In fact, when I walk around, you know, when I used to walk around with my, with my back, my laptop and go into offices, um you know, if I had my laptop and my tablet and my my my smartwatch, I had 12 to 16 cores on me and a couple of terabytes of capacity all connected with the equivalent of tens of T ones. Right? So what was once a small or or a mid sized data center just in the last decade or so? We now all walk around a small data centers and the power that that compute now brings to the edge allows us to take analytics that was really once done in data centers. I may have captured it at the edge, but I had to move it into a data lake. I had to stage it and analyze it. It was more of a historical way of looking at data. Now I can put compute right next to the point of data generation and give insight instantaneously as data is being generated. And that's opening up whole new ways that industries can drive new value for them and for their customers. And that's really what's exciting about it is this combination of these technologies that are all sort of maturing and coming together at the same time. Um, and there's just so much doing, it happened that space and devils really, really excited to be part of bringing that into these environments for our customers. >>I'm gonna give you a stat that a lot of people, I don't, I don't think realize, uh, you talked about moore's law and you're absolutely right. It's really, you know, technically moore's law is about the density, right? But the outcome of being able to do that is performance. And if you do the math, you know, moore's law doubling performance every two years, roughly, The math on that is that means 44 improvement per year in performance. Everybody talks about how moore's laws is dead. It's not, it's just changing. Here's the, here's the stat. If you take a system on a chip, take like for instance apples a 14 and go back five years from 2015 to 2021. If you add up the performance of the CPU the combinatorial factors of the CPU gpu and in the N. P. U. The neural processing unit, just those three, The growth rate has been 118 a year vs 44%. So it's actually accelerating and that doesn't include the accelerators and the DSPS and all the other alternative processors. So, and to your point and by the way that a 14 shipping cost Apple 50 bucks. So and and that fits in the palm of your hand to the point that you were just making So imagine that processing power at the edge most of of of of of ai today is modeling, let's say in the cloud, the vast majority is going to be a i influencing at the edge. So you are right on on that point. >>Yeah, there's no question about it. So, to your point, I mean, moore's law is just of course CPU itself. All right. And it comes out to roughly, on average, it's about 10 x every five years. 100 X every 10 years, 1000 X every 15 years. I mean, it's incredible how much power you can put in a small footprint today. And then if you factor in the accelerators and everything else um, it's actually if anything that innovation is going faster and faster and to your point, um you know, the while the modeling is still going to typically happen in data centers as you pull together lots of different data sets to be able to analyze and create new models. But those models are getting pushed right out to the edge on these compute devices literally feet away at times from the point of data generation to be able to give us really real time analytics and influencing. The other cool thing about this too is you know we're going from sort of more looking backwards and making business analytics based on what has already happened in the past to being able to do that in the very near past. And of course now with modern analytics and models that are being created for ai we're able to do more predictive analytics so we can actually identify errors, identify challenges before they even occur based on pattern matching that they're saying. Um So it's really opening up new doors and new areas that we've never been able to see before that's really all powered by by these capabilities. >>It's insane the amount of data that is coming. We think data is overwhelming today. You ain't seen nothing yet. Um Now erin you cover the edge and the telecom business up. I was beside it when I when I when I found that out because the telecom businesses is ripe for transformation. Um So what do you how is Dell thinking about that? Why are you sort of putting those together? What are the synergies that you see in in the commonalities in those 22 sectors? >>Yeah. I mean at the end of the day it's really all about serving the enterprise customers in the in the organizations of all kinds um that the industry is trying to bring these edge technologies too and that's no different with the telecommunications industry. Right? So you know when when the when the four G world changed about 10 years ago um you know the telecom industry was able to bring the plumbing the network piping out to all the endpoints but they really didn't capture the over the top revenue opportunities that Four G technologies opened up right. That really went to the hyper scholars. It went to you know, a lot of the companies that we all know and love like uh you know, Uber and Airbnb and netflix and others um and that really when the four Gr that was really more about opening up consumer opportunities as we move to five G. And as we move these ultra low latency and high bandwidth capabilities out to the enterprise edge, it's really the B two B opportunities that are opening up and so on the telecom side we're partnering with the telecommunication companies to modernize their network, enroll five G. L. Quickly. But one of the more important things is that we're partnering with them to be able to build services over the top of that that they can then sell into their customer base and their business customer base. So whether that's mech, whether that's private mobility, um delivering data services over the top of those networks, there's a tremendous opportunity for the telecoms to be able to go and capture um Ed revenue opportunities and we're here to help them to partner with them to be able to do that. Now if you put yourself in the shoes of the customer, the enterprise business, a manufacturer or retail, who's looking to be able to leverage these technologies, there's a variety of ways in which they're going to be able to to to consume these technologies. In some cases they'll be getting it direct from vendors direct from Dell Technologies and others. They might be using solutions integrators to be able to combine these technologies together for a particular solution. They may get some of those technologies from their telecom provider and even others, they might get it from the cloud provider. So um Dell wants to make sure that we're being able to help our customers across a variety of ways in which they want to consume those technologies and we have to businesses focused on that. We've got one business focused on edge solutions where we partner with oT vendors closely as well as cloud providers to be able to provide a technology and infrastructure based on which we can consolidate edge workloads To be able to allow customers that want to be able to run those um those services on prem and by those from a direct vendor. Um there's other customers that want to get those through the telecoms. And so we work closely with the telecommunication providers to provide them that modern cloud native disaggregated network that they're looking to build to support 5G. And then help them build those services on the top that they can sell either way whether the customer wants to get that from a vendor like Dell or from a service provider like like uh like an A T and T and Verizon or others. Um Dell looks to partner with them and be a way to provide that underlying infrastructure that connects all of that together for them. >>Well, I mean the beauty of the telco networks is their hardened. But the problem for the telco networks is they're they're hardened and so you've got the over over the top vendors bow guarding their network. The cost per bit is coming down, data is going through the roof and the telcos can't, they can't participate in that over the top and get to those subscribers. But with Five G. And the technologies that you're talking about bringing to the telecoms world, they're they're gonna transform and many are going to start competing directly and this is just a whole new world out there. I wonder Aaron if you could talk about um what you're specifically talking about at Del Tech World this year as it relates to Edge. >>Sure. So the both of the businesses hedge in telecom have a couple announcements this year. This this year, Deltek World, um starting with Edge um as you may recall back in uh in in the fall of last year when we had our last technologies world, we announced our intent to launch an edge business. Um so that that was formulated and stood up over the last couple of months and and we're really focusing on a couple of different areas. How do we look at our overall Dell technologies portfolio and be able to bring particular products and solutions that exist already and be able to apply those uh to edge use cases. We're looking at building a platform which would allow us to be able to consolidate a variety of workloads. And of course we're working on partnerships specifically in the ot space to be able to vertical eyes these offers to help particular uh particular industries. Right now we're focusing on manufacturing and retail but we'll expand that over time. So at Del Tech World this year we're launching our first set of of solutions family which is going to be the Dell Technologies manufacturing edge solutions, the first one that's gonna be launching as a reference architecture with PTC um thing works on top of what we're also proud to be announcing this week, which is our apex private cloud offering. So this is the first example of of of a partnership with an O. T. Provider on top of apex private cloud so that we can bring in as a service platform offering to the Enterprise edge uh for manufacturers. And combined with one of the industry's leading oT software vendors of thing works. So that's one of the solutions were doing um we're also looking to launch a product which is we're taking our existing um streaming data platform from our unified storage team and taking that, which was once running in the data center out to edge these cases as well. And that allows us to be able to capture click stream data in manufacturing and other environments, buffer and cash that in a in an appliance and then be able to move that off to a data like for longer term analytics. While it's in that buffered state though we open provide a P. I. S. So that you can actually do real time influencing against those click stream data as it's flowing through the appliance on its way to the data lake for longer term analytics. So those are two key areas that we're gonna be focusing on from an edge perspective on the telecom side. Um we're really this is going to be a big year from us as we move towards creating a common end end five G platform from quarter Iran and then also start focusing on partnerships and ecosystems on top of that platform. Uh last week at Red hat summit we actually announced a reference architecture for red hat. Open shift on top of Dell technologies infrastructure servers and networking. And here at Dell technologies world. This week we're announcing a reference architecture with VM ware. So running VM ware telecom cloud platform. Also on top of Dell technologies. Power edge servers and power such as um so this allows us to create that foundation that open cloud native. These are container and virtual layers on top of our hard work to give that that cloud native disaggregated uh, network claim to be able to now run and build core edge and ran solutions on top of and you'll be hearing more about what we're doing in this space in the coming months. >>Nice. That's great. The open ran stuff is really exciting now, last question. So mobile world Congress, the biggest telco show is coming up in late june Yeah, still on. According to the G S M, a lot of people have tapped out um, and but the cube is planning to be there with a hybrid presence, both virtual and physical. We'll see um I wonder if there's anything you want to talk about just in terms of what's happening in telco telco transformation, you guys got any get any events coming up, what can you tell us? >>Yeah, so we took a close look at mobile world congress and and uh this has been a challenging year for everybody. Um you know, Dell as well as many other vendors made the decision this year that we would actually not participate, but we look forward to participating uh with full gusto next year when it's back in a physical environment. Um So what we've decided to do is we are going to be having our own virtual launch event on june 9th. Um And in that event, the theme of that is going to be the modern ecosystem in the neighboring leveraging the power of open. Um So we'll be talking a little bit more about what we're doing from that open cloud, native network infrastructure and then also talk a little bit more about what Dell technologies looking to do to bring a broad ecosystem of technology vendors together and deliver that ecosystem platform for the telecom industry. So registration actually opens this week at Dell Technologies World. So if you go to Dell technologies dot com can register for the event. Um we're really excited to be talking to the telecom providers and also other hardware and software vendors that are in that space to see how we can work together to really drive this next generation of five G. >>That's awesome. I'll be looking for that and and look forward to collaborating with you on that, bringing your thought leadership and the cube community we would really love to to partner on that. Aaron, thanks so much for coming to the cube. Really exciting area and best of luck to you. >>Right. Thank you. I appreciate the time. >>All right. And thank you for watching everybody says Dave Volonte for the Cubes, continuous coverage of Del Tech World 2021. The virtual version will be right back right after this short break.

Published Date : May 6 2021

SUMMARY :

of telco in the future of our expanding tech universe. I'm glad to be here with you. but it's kind of mainstream and now the Edge is all the rage. it's going to be, you know, at point of sale, whether that's in a store or on your device, I mean most of the edge data has I may have captured it at the edge, but I had to move it into a data lake. So and and that fits in the palm of your hand to the point that you were just making So imagine do that in the very near past. What are the synergies that you see in in the commonalities But one of the more important things is that we're partnering with them to be able to build that over the top and get to those subscribers. While it's in that buffered state though we open provide a P. I. S. So that you can actually and but the cube is planning to be there with a hybrid presence, both virtual and physical. Um And in that event, the theme of that is going to be the modern ecosystem in I'll be looking for that and and look forward to collaborating with you on that, I appreciate the time. And thank you for watching everybody says Dave Volonte for the Cubes, continuous coverage of Del Tech World 2021.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
12QUANTITY

0.99+

Aaron ChaissonPERSON

0.99+

VerizonORGANIZATION

0.99+

100QUANTITY

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

AaronPERSON

0.99+

1000QUANTITY

0.99+

Dave VolontePERSON

0.99+

2015DATE

0.99+

TelkomORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

44%QUANTITY

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

Aaron JasonPERSON

0.99+

netflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

AirbnbORGANIZATION

0.99+

june 9thDATE

0.99+

CasioORGANIZATION

0.99+

50 bucksQUANTITY

0.99+

Deltek WorldORGANIZATION

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

This weekDATE

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

16 coresQUANTITY

0.99+

this yearDATE

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

each industryQUANTITY

0.98+

22 sectorsQUANTITY

0.98+

MoorePERSON

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.98+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.98+

EdgeORGANIZATION

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

late ninetiesDATE

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.97+

late juneDATE

0.97+

A TORGANIZATION

0.97+

last decadeDATE

0.97+

Del Tech World 2021EVENT

0.96+

half a centuryQUANTITY

0.96+

threeQUANTITY

0.96+

first calculatorQUANTITY

0.95+

each verticalQUANTITY

0.95+

14 shippingQUANTITY

0.95+

Dell Technologies World 2021EVENT

0.95+

applesORGANIZATION

0.94+

first setQUANTITY

0.94+

118 a yearQUANTITY

0.93+

two key areasQUANTITY

0.93+

first oneQUANTITY

0.93+

44 improvementQUANTITY

0.93+

two keyQUANTITY

0.92+

one whole terabyteQUANTITY

0.92+

Five G.ORGANIZATION

0.92+

four GrORGANIZATION

0.92+

Red hat summitEVENT

0.92+

Del Tech WorldORGANIZATION

0.91+

every five yearsQUANTITY

0.91+

E M CORGANIZATION

0.91+

GORGANIZATION

0.9+

every 10 yearsQUANTITY

0.88+

APAC LIVE RT


 

>>Good afternoon and welcome back to our audience here in Asia pacific This is Sandeep again uh from my home studio in Singapore, I hope you found the session to be insightful. I thought it was a key takeaway in terms of how you know the the world is going through a massive transformation, driven by underpinning the workload optimized solutions around up by round of security, 3 60 degree security. As Neil Mcdonald talked about underpinned by the scale, you know, whether you're on exa scale, compute public cloud or on the edge and that's kind of underpinning the digital transformation that our customers are going to go through. I have two special guests with me. Uh let me just quickly introduce them Santos restaurant martin who uh is the Managing director for intel in A P. K. And Dorinda Kapoor, Managing Director for HB Initial pacific So, good afternoon, both you gentlemen. >>Good afternoon. >>So Santos. My first question is to you, first of all, a comment, you know, the passion at which uh, pad Kill Singer talked through the four superpowers. That was amazing. You know, I could see that passion comes through the screen. You know, I think everybody in the audience could relate with that. We are like, you know, as you know, on the words of the launch, the gentle plus by power, but it's isolate processor from intel, what are you seeing and what do our customers should expect improvements, especially with regard to the business outcomes. >>Yeah, So first of all, thank you so much for having me in this session and, and as you said, Sandeep, I mean, you could really see how energized we are. And you heard that from pad as well. Uh, so we launched the third gen, intel, Xeon processors or isolate, you know about a couple of weeks ago and I'm sure, you know, there's lots of benefits that you get in these new products. But I thought what I'll do is I'll try and summarize them in three key buckets. The first one is about the performance benefits that these new products bring in. The 2nd 1 is the value of platforms and I think the last pieces about the partnerships and how it makes deployment really easy and simple for our customers. Let me start with the first one which is about performance and the and the big jump that we're staying. It's about a 46% performance, increased generation over generation. It's flexible, it's optimized performance from the edge to the cloud where you would see about 1.5 to 1.7 X improvements on key war clouds like the cloud five G I O D HPC and AI that are so critical all around us. It's probably the only data center processor that has built in A I acceleration that helps with faster analytics. It's got security optimist on intel SGX that basically gives you a secure on cliff when when sensitive data is getting transacted and it also has crypto acceleration that reduces any performance impact because of the pervasive encryption that we have all around us. Now The second key benefit is about platform and if you remember when we launch sky lake in 2017, we laid out a strategy that said that we are here to help customers >>move, >>store and process data. So it's not just the CPU that we announced with the third genitals, jOHn Announcements. We also announce products like the obtained persistent memory, 200 cds That gives you about a 32 higher memory bandwidth and six terabytes of memory capacity on stock. It the obtain S S D S, the intel internet, 800 cities adapter that gives you about 200 Gbps per port, which means you can move data much more faster and you have the intellectual X F P G s that gives you about a double the better fabric performance for what? Which means if there's key workloads that you want to go back and offloaded to a to a steak or a specific uh CPU then you have the F P G s that can really help you there Now. What does the platform do for our customers? It helps them build higher application and system level performance that they can all benefit from the last b which is the partnerships area is a critical one because we've had decades of experience of solution delivery with a broad ecosystem and with partners like HP and we build elements like the Intel select solution and the market ready solution that makes it so much more easier for our customers to deploy with Over 50 million Xeon scalable processes that is shipped around the world. A billion Xeon cores that are powering the cloud since 2013 customers have really a proven solution that they can work with. So in summary, I want you to remember the three key piece that can really >>help you be >>successful with these new products, the performance uplifted, you get generation over generation, the platform benefits. So it's not just the CPU but it's things around that that makes the system and the application work way better. And then the partnerships that give you peace of mind because you can go deploy proven solutions that you can go and implement in your organization and serve your customers better. >>Thanks. Thanks thanks and Tosha for clearly outlining, you know, the three PS and kind of really resonates well. Um, so let me just uh turn over you know, to Dorinda there in the hot, you know, there's a lot of new solutions, you're our new treaties that santos talked about security, you get a lot of performance benefits and yet our customers have to go through a massive amount of change from a digital transformation perspective in order that they take all the advantages in state competitive. We're using HP Iran addressing the needs for the challenges of our customers and how we really helping them accelerate their transformation journey. >>Yeah, sure. Sandeep, thanks a lot for the question. And you are right. Most of the businesses actually need to go uh digital transformation in order to stay relevant in the current times. And in fact actually COVID-19 has further accelerated the pace of digital transformation for uh most of our customers. And actually the digital transformation is all about delivering differentiated experiences and outcomes at the age by converting data collected from multiple different sources to insights and actions. So we actually an HP believe that enterprise of the future is going to be eight centric data driven and cloud enabled And with our strategy of providing H2 cloud platform and having a complete portfolio of uh software, networking computer and the storage solutions both at the age and court uh to of course collect, transmit secure, analyze and store data. I believe we are in the best position to help our customers start and execute on their transformation journey. Now reality is various enterprises are at different stages of their transformation journey. You know, uh we in HP are able to help our customers who are at the early stage or just starting the transformation journey to to help build their transformation broad maps with the help of our advisory teams and uh after that helped them to execute on the same with our professional services team. While for the customers who are already midway in the transformation journey, we have been helping them to differentiate themselves by delivering workload optimized solutions which provide latency, flexibility and performance. They need to turn data into insights and innovations to help their business. Now, speaking of the workload optimized solutions, HP has actually doubled down in this area with the help of our partners like Intel, which powers our latest Gentlemen plus platform. This brings more compute power, memory and storage capacity which our customers need as they process more data and solve more complex challenges within their business. >>Thank you. Thanks. And er in there I think that's really insightful. Hopefully you know our customer base, I will start joined in here, can hear that and take advantage of you know, how HP is helping you know, fast track the exploration. I come back to you something you don't like during the talk about expanding capacities and we saw news about you know Intel invest $20 billion dollars or so, something like that in terms of you know, adding capacities or manufacturing. So I'd like to hear from your perspective, you know how this investments which intel is putting is a kind of a game changer, how you're shaping the industry as we move forward. >>Yeah, I mean as we all know, I think there's accelerated demand for semiconductors across the world digitization especially in an environment that we're that we're going through has really made computing pervasive and it's it's becoming a foundation of every industry and our society, the world just needs more semiconductors. Intel is in a unique position to rise to that occasion and meet the growing demand for semiconductors given our advanced manufacturing scale that we have. So the intel foundry services and the that you mentioned is is part of the Intel's new I. D. M. Torrado strategy that Bad announced which is a differentiated winning formula that will really deliver the new era of innovation, manufacturing and product leadership. We will expand our manufacturing capacity as you mentioned with that 20 billion investments and building to fabs in Arizona. But there's more to come in the year ahead and these fans will support the expanding requirements of our current products and also provide committed capacity for our foundry customers. Our foundry customers will also be able to leverage our leading edge process, the treaty packaging technology, a world class I. P. Portfolio. So >>I'm really really >>excited. I think it's a truly exciting time for our industry. The world requires more semiconductors and Intel is stepping in to help build the same. >>Fantastic, fantastic. Thank you. Some potion is really heartening to know and we really cherish the long partnership, HP and Intel have together. I look forward that you know with this gentleman plus launch and the partnership going forward. You know, we have only motivation and work together. Really appreciate your taking the time and joining and thank you very much for joining us. >>Thank you. >>Thanks. >>Okay, so with that I will move on to our second segment and in white, another special guest and this is Pete Chambers who is the managing director for A N D N A P K. Good afternoon Pete. You can hear us Well >>I can. Thank you. Sandy, Great to be >>here. Good and thanks for joining me. Um I thought I just opened up, you know, like a comment around the 19 world Records uh, am D. N. H. We have together and it's a kind of a testament to the joint working model and relationship and the collaboration. And so again, really thank you for the partnership. We have any change. Uh, let me just quickly get to the first question. You know, when it comes to my mind listening over to what Antonio and Liza were discussing, you know, they're talking about there's a huge amount of flow of data. You know, the technology and the compute needs to be closer to where the data is being generated and how is A. M. D. You know, helping leverage some of those technologies to bring feature and benefits and driving outcome for customers here in asia. >>Yeah, as lisa mentioned, we're now in a high performance computing mega cycle driven by cloud computing, digital transformation five DNA. Which means that everyone needs and wants more computer IDC predicts that by 20 23/65 percent of the impact GDP will be digitized. So there's an inflection coming with digital transformation at the fall, businesses are ever increasingly looking for trusted partners like HP and HP and and to help them address and adapt to these complex emerging technologies while keeping their IT infrastructure highly efficient, you know, and is helping enable this transformation by bringing leadership performance such as high court densities, high PC and increased I. O. But at the same time offering the best efficiency and performance for what all third gen Epic. CPU support 100 and 28 lanes of superfast PC for connectivity to four terabytes of memory and multiple layers of security. You know, we've heard from our customers that security continues to be a key consideration, you know? And he continues to listen. And with third gen, Epic, we're providing a multitude of security features such as secure root of trust at the bios level which we work very closely with HP on secure encrypted virtualization, secure memory encryption and secure nested paging to really giving the customers confidence when designing Epic. We look very closely at the key workloads that our customers will be looking to enable. And we've designed Epic from the ground up to deliver superior experience. So high performance computing is growing in this region and our leadership per socket core density of up to 64 cause along with leading IO and high memory bandwidth provides a compelling solution to help solve customers most complex computational problems faster. New HP Apollo 6500 and 10 systems featuring third gen, Epic are also optimist for artificial intelligence capabilities to improve training and increased accuracy and results. And we also now support up to eight and instinct accelerators. In each of these systems, hyper converged infrastructure continues to gain momentum in today's modern data center and our superior core density helps deliver more VMS per CPU supported by a multitude of security virtualization features to provide peace of mind and works very closely with industry leaders in HD like HP but also Nutanix and VM ware to help simplify the customers infrastructure. And in recent times we've seen video. I have a resurgence as companies have looked to empower their remote employee remote employees. Third gen, Epic enables more video sessions per CPU providing a more cost optimized solution, simply put Epics higher core density per CPU means customers need fewer service. That means less space required, lower power and cooling expenditure and as a result, a tangibly lower total cost of ownership add to this the fact, as you mentioned that Andy Epic with HP of 19 world records across virtualization, energy efficiency, decision support, database workloads, etc. And service side java. And it all adds up to a very strong value proposition to encourage Cdos to embark on their next upgrade cycle with HP and Epic >>Interstate. Thank you Peter and really quite insightful. And I've just done that question over to Narendra Pete talked about great new technologies, new solution, new areas that are going to benefit from these technology enhancements at the same time. You know, if I'm a customer, I look at every time we talk about technology, you know, you need to invest and where is you know, the bigger concern for customers always wears this money will come from. So I want to uh, you know, uh, the if you share your insights, how is actually helping customers to be able to implement these technology solutions, giving them a financial flexibility so that they can drive business outcomes. >>Yes, and the very important point, you know, from how HP is able to help our customers from their transformation. Now, reality is that most of the traditional enterprises are being challenged by this new digital bond businesses who have no doubt of funding and very low expectation of profitability. But in reality, majority of the capital of these traditional enterprises has uh tied up in their existing businesses as they do need to keep current operations running while starting their digital transformation at the same time. This of course creates real challenges and funding their transformation. Now with HP, with our Green Lake Cloud services, we are able to help customers fund their transformation journey. Were instead of buying up front, customers pay only for what they consume as the scale. We are not only able to offer flexible consumption model for new investments but are also able to help our customers, you know, for monetize their capital, which is tied up in the old ICT infrastructure because we can buy back that old infrastructure and convert that into conception of frank. So while customers can continue to use those assets to run their current business and reality is HIV is the leader in the this as a service space and probably the only vendor to be able to offer as a service offering for all of our portfolio. Uh, if you look at the ideas prediction, 70 of the applications are not ready for public cloud and will continue to run in private environments in addition. And everybody talked about the beef for a I and you know, HPC as well as the edge and more and more workloads are actually moving to the edge where the public cloud will have for less and less a role to play. But when you look at the customers, they are more and more looking for a cloud, like business model for all the workloads, uh, that they're running outside the public cloud. Now, with our being like offering, we are able to take away all the complexity from customers, allowing them to run the workloads wherever they want. That means that the edge in the data center or in the cloud and consume in the way they want. In other words, we're able to provide cloud, like experience anytime, anywhere to our customers. And of course, all these Green Lake offerings are powered by our latest compute capabilities that HP has to offer. >>Thank you. Thank you, surrender. That's really, really, very insightful. I have a minute or two, so let me try to squeeze another question from your feet, you know, MD is just now introduced the third generation of epics and congratulations on that. How are you seeing that? Excellent. Helping you accelerate in this growth, in the impact? Uh, you know, the geography as as such. >>Sure, great question. And as I mentioned, you know, third gen Epic with me and and once again delivers industry leading solutions, bending the curve on performance efficiency and TCO helping more than ever to deliver along with HP the right technologies for today and tomorrow. You know, in the service space, it's not just about what you can offer today. You need to be able to predictably deliver innovation over the long term. And we are committed to doing just that, you know, and strategy is to focus on the customer. We continue to see strong growth both globally and in a pack in HPC cloud and Web tech manufacturing, Fc telco and public and government sectors are growth plan is focused on getting closer to our customers directly, engaging with HP and our partners and the end customer to help guide them on the best solution and assist them in solving their computing pain points cost effectively. A recent example of this is our partnership with palsy supercomputing center in Australia, where HP and M. D will be helping to provide some 200,000 cause across 1600 nodes and over 750 radio on instinct accelerators empowering scientists to solve today's most challenging problems. We have doubled ourselves and F8 teams in the region over the past year and will continue to invest in additional customer facing sales and technical people through 2021, you know, and has worked very closely with HP to co design and co developed the best technologies for our customers needs. We joined forces over seven years ago to prepare for the first generation of Epic at launch and you fast forward to today and it's great to see that HP now has a very broad range of Andy Epic servers spanning from the edge two extra scale. So we are truly excited about what we can offer the market in partnership with HP and feel that we offer a very strong foundation of differentiation for our channel partners to address their customers need to accelerate accelerate their digital transformation. Thank you. Sandy, >>thank you. Thanks Peter. And really it's been amazing partnering with the NDP here and thanks for your sponsorship on that. And together we want to work with you to create another 19 world records right from here in the issue. Absolutely. So with that we are coming to the end of the event. Really thanks for coming pete and to our audience here because the pig is being a great a couple of hours. I hope you all found these sessions very, very insightful. You heard from our worldwide experts as to where, you know, divorce, moving in terms of the transformation, what your hp is bringing to our compute workload optimized solutions which are going to go from regardless of what scale of computing you're using and wrapped around 3 60 security and then offer truly as a service experience. But before you drop off, I would like to request you to please scan the QR code you see on your screen and fill in the feedback form we have, you know, lucky draw for some $50 worth of vultures for the five lucky winners today. So please click up your phone and, you know, spend a minute or two and give us a feedback and thank you very much again for this wonderful day. And I wish everybody a great day. Thank you.

Published Date : Apr 23 2021

SUMMARY :

I thought it was a key takeaway in terms of how you know the the world is We are like, you know, as you know, on the words of the launch, it's optimized performance from the edge to the cloud where you would see about 1.5 have the intellectual X F P G s that gives you about a double the better fabric performance successful with these new products, the performance uplifted, you get generation over generation, so let me just uh turn over you know, to Dorinda that enterprise of the future is going to be eight centric data driven and cloud I come back to you So the intel foundry services and the that you mentioned is is part of the Intel's new I. I think it's a truly exciting time for our industry. I look forward that you Okay, so with that I will move on to our second segment and Sandy, Great to be You know, the technology and the compute needs to be closer to where the data to be a key consideration, you know? the if you share your insights, how is actually helping customers to be able Yes, and the very important point, you know, from how HP is able to help our customers from Uh, you know, the geography as as such. You know, in the service space, it's not just about what you can offer today. to please scan the QR code you see on your screen and fill in the feedback

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Neil McdonaldPERSON

0.99+

AntonioPERSON

0.99+

PeterPERSON

0.99+

HPORGANIZATION

0.99+

AustraliaLOCATION

0.99+

SandeepPERSON

0.99+

SingaporeLOCATION

0.99+

ArizonaLOCATION

0.99+

200 cdsQUANTITY

0.99+

28 lanesQUANTITY

0.99+

Dorinda KapoorPERSON

0.99+

PetePERSON

0.99+

2017DATE

0.99+

Narendra PetePERSON

0.99+

LizaPERSON

0.99+

ToshaPERSON

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

first questionQUANTITY

0.99+

Pete ChambersPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

second segmentQUANTITY

0.99+

COVID-19OTHER

0.99+

lisaPERSON

0.99+

SandyPERSON

0.99+

asiaLOCATION

0.99+

100QUANTITY

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

$50QUANTITY

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

first oneQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

six terabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

800 citiesQUANTITY

0.99+

Andy EpicPERSON

0.99+

NDPORGANIZATION

0.99+

a minuteQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.98+

2nd 1QUANTITY

0.98+

Apollo 6500COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.98+

five lucky winnersQUANTITY

0.98+

two special guestsQUANTITY

0.98+

EpicORGANIZATION

0.98+

eachQUANTITY

0.98+

DorindaLOCATION

0.98+

1600 nodesQUANTITY

0.97+

about 200 GbpsQUANTITY

0.97+

tomorrowDATE

0.97+

HBORGANIZATION

0.97+

third genQUANTITY

0.97+

NutanixORGANIZATION

0.97+

first generationQUANTITY

0.96+

four terabytesQUANTITY

0.96+

decadesQUANTITY

0.96+

intelORGANIZATION

0.96+

Third genQUANTITY

0.95+

$20 billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.95+

19 world recordsQUANTITY

0.95+

70 of the applicationsQUANTITY

0.94+

Jon Hrschtick, Onshape and Dayna Grayson, Construct Capital | Innovation For Good


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube presenting innovation for good, brought to you by on shape. >>Hello, everyone, and welcome to Innovation for Good Program, hosted by the Cuban. Brought to You by on Shape, which is a PTC company. My name is Dave Valentin. I'm coming to you from our studios outside of Boston. I'll be directing the conversations today. It's a very exciting, all live program. We're gonna look at how product innovation has evolved, where it's going and how engineers, entrepreneurs and educators are applying cutting edge, cutting edge product development techniques and technology to change our world. You know, the pandemic is, of course, profoundly impacted society and altered how individuals and organizations they're gonna be thinking about and approaching the coming decade. Leading technologists, engineers, product developers and educators have responded to the new challenges that we're facing from creating lifesaving products to helping students learn from home toe how to apply the latest product development techniques and solve the world's hardest problems. And in this program, you'll hear from some of the world's leading experts and practitioners on how product development and continuous innovation has evolved, how it's being applied toe positive, positively affect society and importantly where it's going in the coming decades. So let's get started with our first session fueling Tech for good. And with me is John Herstek, who is the president of the Suffers, a service division of PTC, which required on shape just over a year ago, where John was the CEO and co founder. And Dana Grayson is here. She is the co founder and general partner at Construct Capital, a new venture capital firm. Folks, welcome to the program. Thanks so much for coming on. Great >>to be here, Dave. >>All right, John. You're very welcome. Dana. Look, John, let's get into it for first. A belated congratulations on the acquisition of Von Shape. That was an awesome seven year journey for your company. Tell our audience a little bit about the story of on shape, but take us back to Day zero. Why did you and your co founders start on shape? Well, >>actually, start before on shaping the You know, David, I've been in this business for almost 40 years. The business of building software tools for product developers and I had been part of some previous products in the industry and companies that had been in their era. Big changes in this market and about, you know, a little Before founding on shape, we started to see the problems product development teams were having with the traditional tools of that era years ago, and we saw the opportunity presented by Cloud Web and Mobile Technology. And we said, Hey, we could use Cloud Web and Mobile to solve the problems of product developers make their Their business is run better. But we have to build an entirely new system, an entirely new company, to do it. And that's what on shapes about. >>Well, so notwithstanding the challenges of co vid and difficulties this year, how is the first year been as, Ah, division of PTC for you guys? How's business? Anything you can share with us? >>Yeah, our first year of PTC has been awesome. It's been, you know, when you get acquired, Dave, you never You know, you have great optimism, but you never know what life will really be like. It's sort of like getting married or something, you know, until you're really doing it, you don't know. And so I'm happy to say that one year into our acquisition, a TPI TC on shape is thriving. It's worked out better than I could have imagined a year ago. Along always, I mean sales are up. In Q four, our new sales rate grew 80% vs Excuse me, our fiscal Q four Q three. In the calendar year, it grew 80% compared to the year before. Our educational uses skyrocketing with around 400% growth, most recently year to year of students and teachers and co vid. And we've launched a major cloud platform using the core of on shape technology called Atlas. So, um, just tons of exciting things going on a TTC. >>That's awesome. But thank you for sharing some of those metrics. And of course, you're very humble individual. You know, people should know a little bit more about you mentioned, you know, we founded solid works, go founded solid, where I actually found it solid works. You had a great exit in the late nineties. But what I really appreciate is, you know, you're an entrepreneur. You've got a passion for the babies that you helped birth. You stayed with the salt systems for a number of years. The company that quiet, solid works well over a decade. And and, of course, you and I have talked about how you participated in the M I t blackjack team. You know, back in the day a Z I say you're very understated, for somebody was so accomplished. So well, >>that's kind of you. But I tend to I tend Thio always keep my eye more on what's ahead. You know what's next then? And you know, I look back Sure to enjoy it and learn from it about what I can put toe work, making new memories, making new successes. >>I love it. Okay, let's bring Dana into the conversation. Hello, Dana. And you Look, you were fairly early investor in on shape when you were with any A. And I think it was like it was a Siri's B. But it was very right close after the A raise. And and you were and still are a big believer in industrial transformation. So take us back. What did you see about on shape back then? That that excited you? >>Thanks. Thanks for that. Yeah. I was lucky to be a early investment in shape. You know, the things that actually attracted me. Don shape were largely around John and, uh, the team. They're really setting out to do something, as John says humbly, something totally new, but really building off of their background was a large part of it. Um, but, you know, I was really intrigued by the design collaboration side of the product. Um, I would say that's frankly what originally attracted me to it. What kept me in the room, you know, in terms of the industrial world was seeing just if you start with collaboration around design what that does to the overall industrial product lifecycle accelerating manufacturing just, you know, modernizing, manufacturing, just starting with design. So I'm really thankful to the on shape guys, because it was one of the first investments I've made that turned me on to the whole sector. And, wow, just such a great pleasure to work with with John and the whole team there. Now see what they're doing inside PTC, >>and you just launched construct capital this year, right in the middle of a pandemic and which is awesome. I love it. And you're focused on early stage investing. Maybe tell us a little bit about construct capital. What? Your investment thesis is and you know, one of the big waves that you're hoping to ride. >>Sure, it construct it is literally lifting out of any what I was doing there, um uh, you're on shape. I went on to invest in companies such as desktop metal and Tulip, to name a couple of them form labs, another one in and around the manufacturing space. But our thesis it construct is broader than just, you know, manufacturing and industrial. It really incorporates all of what we'd call foundational industries that have let yet to be fully tech enabled or digitized. Manufacturing is a big piece of it. Supply chain, logistics, transportation and mobility or not, or other big pieces of it. And together they really drive, you know, half of the GDP in the US and have been very under invested. And frankly, they haven't attracted really great founders like Iran in droves. And I think that's going to change. We're seeing, um, entrepreneurs coming out of the tech world or staggolee into these industries and then bringing them back into the tech world, which is which is something that needs to happen. So John and team were certainly early pioneers and I think, you know, frankly, obviously, that voting with my feet that the next set, a really strong companies are going to come out of this space over the next decade. >>I think there's a huge opportunity to digitize the sort of traditionally non digital organizations. But Dana, you focused. I think it's it's accurate to say you're focused on even Mawr early stage investing now. And I want to understand why you feel it's important to be early. I mean, it's obviously riskier and reward e er, but what do you look for in companies and and founders like John >>Mhm, Um, you know, I think they're different styles of investing all the way up to public market investing. I've always been early stage investors, so I like to work with founders and teams when they're, you know, just starting out. Um, I happened to also think that we were just really early in the whole digital transformation of this world. You know, John and team have been, you know, back from solid works, etcetera around the space for a long time. But again, the downstream impact of what they're doing really changes the whole industry and and so we're pretty early and in digitally transforming that market. Um, so that's another reason why I wanna invest early now, because I do really firmly believe that the next set of strong companies and strong returns for my own investors will be in the spaces. Um, you know, what I look for in Founders are people that really see the world in a different way. And, you know, sometimes some people think of founders or entrepreneurs is being very risk seeking. You know, if you asked John probably and another successful entrepreneurs, they would call themselves sort of risk averse, because by the time they start the company, they really have isolated all the risk out of it and think that they have given their expertise or what they're seeing their just so compelled to go change something, eh? So I look for that type of attitude experience a Z. You can also tell from John. He's fairly humble. So humility and just focus is also really important. Um, that there's a that's a lot of it. Frankly, >>excellent. Thank you. And John, you got such a rich history in the space in one of you could sort of connect the dots over time. I mean, when you look back, what were the major forces that you saw in the market in in the early days? Uh, particularly days of on shape on how is that evolved? And what are you seeing today? Well, I >>think I touched on it earlier. Actually, could I just reflect on what Dana said about risk taking for just a quick one and say, throughout my life, from blackjack to starting solid works on shape, it's about taking calculated risks. Yes, you try to eliminate the risk sa's much as you can, but I always say, I don't mind taking a risk that I'm aware of, and I've calculated through as best I can. I don't like taking risks that I don't know I'm taking. >>That's right. You like to bet on >>sure things as much sure things, or at least where you feel you. You've done the research and you see them and you know they're there and you know, you, you you keep that in mind in the room, and I think that's great. And Dana did so much for us. Dana, I want to thank you again for all that you did it every step of the way from where we started. Thio, Thio You know your journey with us ended formally but continues informally. Now back to you. Um, Dave, I think question about the opportunity and how it's shaped up. Well, I think I touched on it earlier when I said It's about helping product developers. You know, our customers of the people build the future of manufactured goods. Anything you think of that would be manufacturing factory. You know, the chair you're sitting in machine that made your coffee. You know, the computer you're using that trucks that drive by on the street, all the covert product research, the equipment being used to make vaccines. All that stuff is designed by someone, and our job is given the tools to do it better. And I could see the problems that those product developers had that we're slowing them down with using the computing systems of the time. When we built solid works, that was almost 30 years ago. People don't realize that it was in the early >>nineties, and, you know, we did the >>best we could for the early nineties, but what we did, we didn't anticipate the world of today. And so people were having problems with just installing the systems. Dave, you wouldn't believe how hard it is to install these systems. You need a spec up a special windows computer, you know, and make sure you've got all the memory and graphics you need and getting to get that set up. You need to make sure the device drivers air, right, install a big piece of software. Ah, license key. I'm not making this up. They're still around. You may not even know what those are. You know, Dennis laughing because, you know, zero cool people do things like this anymore on but only runs some windows. You want a second user to use it? They need a copy. They need a code. Are they on the same version? It's a nightmare. The teams change. You know? You just say, Well, get everyone on the software. Well, who's everyone? You know? You got a new vendor today? A new customer tomorrow, a new employee. People come on and off the team. The other problem is the data stored in files, thousands of files. This isn't like a spreadsheet or word processor where there's one file to pass around these air thousands of files to make one, even a simple product. People were tearing their hair out. John, what do we do? I've got copies everywhere. I don't know where the latest version is. We tried like, you know, locking people out so that only one person can change it at the time that works against speed. It works against innovation. We saw what was happening with Cloud Web and mobile. So what's happened in the years since is every one of the forces that product developers experience the need for speed, the need for innovation, the need to be more efficient with their people in their capital. Resource is every one of those trends have been amplified since we started on shape by a lot of forces in the world. And covert is amplified all those the need for agility and remote work cove it is amplified all that the same time, The acceptance of cloud. You know, a few years ago, people were like cloud, you know, how is that gonna work now They're saying to me, you know, increasingly, how would you ever even have done this without the cloud? How do you make solid works Work without the cloud? How would that even happen? You know, And once people understand what on shapes about >>and we're the >>Onley full SAS solution software as a service, full SAS solution in our industry. So what's happened in those years? Same problems we saw earlier, but turn up the gain, their bigger problems. And with cloud, we've seen skepticism of years ago turn into acceptance. And now even embracement in the cova driven new normal. >>Yeah. So a lot of friction in the previous environments cloud obviously a huge factor on, I guess. I guess Dana John could see it coming, you know, in the early days of solid works with Salesforce, which is kind of the first major independent SAS player. Well, I guess that was late nineties. So it was post solid works, but pre in shape and their work day was, you know, pre on shape in the mid two thousands. And and but But, you know, the bet was on the SAS model was right for Crick had and and product development, you know, which Maybe the time wasn't a no brainer. Or maybe it was I don't know, but Dana is there. Is there anything that you would invest in today that's not Cloud based? >>Um, that's a great question. I mean, I think we still see things all the time in the manufacturing world that are not cloud based. I think you know, the closer you get to the shop floor in the production environment. Um, e think John and the PTC folks would agree with this, too, but that it's, you know, there's reliability requirements. There's performance requirements. There's still this attitude of, you know, don't touch the printing press. So the cloud is still a little bit scary sometimes. And I think hybrid cloud is a real thing for those or on premise. Solutions, in some cases is still a real thing. What, what were more focused on. And, um, despite whether it's on premise or hybrid or or SAS and Cloud is a frictionless go to market model, um, in the companies we invest in so sass and cloud, or really make that easy to adopt for new users, you know, you sign up, start using a product, um, but whether it's hosted in the cloud, whether it's as you can still distribute buying power. And, um, I would I'm just encouraging customers in the customer world and the more industrial environment to entrust some of their lower level engineers with more budget discretionary spending so they can try more products and unlock innovation. >>Right? The unit economics are so compelling. So let's bring it, you know, toe today's you know, situation. John, you decided to exit about a year ago. You know? What did you see in PTC? Other than the obvious money? What was the strategic fit? >>Yeah, Well, David, I wanna be clear. I didn't exit anything. Really? You >>know, I love you and I don't like that term exit. I >>mean, Dana had exit is a shareholder on and so it's not It's not exit for me. It's just a step in the journey. Um, what we saw in PTC was a partner. First of all, that shared our vision from the top down at PTC. Jim Hempleman, the CEO. He had a great vision for for the impact that SAS can make based on cloud technology. And really is Dana of highlighted so much. It's not just the technology is how you go to market and the whole business being run and how you support and make the customers successful. So Jim shared a vision for the potential. And really, really, um said Hey, come join us and we can do this bigger, Better, faster. We expanded the vision really to include this Atlas platform for hosting other SAS applications. That P D. C. I mean, David Day arrived at PTC. I met the head of the academic program. He came over to me and I said, You know, and and how many people on your team? I thought he'd say 5 40 people on the PTC academic team. It was amazing to me because, you know, we were we were just near about 100 people were required are total company. We didn't even have a dedicated academic team and we had ah, lot of students signing up, you know, thousands and thousands. Well, now we have hundreds of thousands of students were approaching a million users, and that shows you the power of this team that PTC had combined with our product and technology whom you get a big success for us and for the teachers and students to the world. We're giving them great tools. So so many good things were also putting some PTC technology from other parts of PTC back into on shape. One area, a little spoiler, little sneak peek. Working on taking generative design. Dana knows all about generative design. We couldn't acquire that technology were start up, you know, just to too much to do. But PTC owns one of the best in the business. This frustrated technology we're working on putting that into on shaping our customers. Um, will be happy to see it, hopefully in the coming year sometime. >>It's great to see that two way exchange. Now, you both know very well when you start a company, of course, a very exciting time. You know, a lot of baggage, you know, our customers pulling you in a lot of different directions and asking you for specials. You have this kind of clean slate, so to speak in it. I would think in many ways, John, despite you know, your install base, you have a bit of that dynamic occurring today especially, you know, driven by the forced march to digital transformation that cove it caused. So when you sit down with the team PTC and talk strategy, you now have more global resource is you got cohorts selling opportunities. What's the conversation like in terms of where you want to take the division? >>Well, Dave, you actually you sounds like we should have you coming in and talking about strategy because you've got the strategy down. I mean, we're doing everything said global expansion were able to reach across selling. We've got some excellent PTC customers that we can reach reach now and they're finding uses for on shape. I think the plan is to, you know, just go, go, go and grow, grow, grow where we're looking for this year, priorities are expand the product. I mentioned the breath of the product with new things PTC did recently. Another technology that they acquired for on shape. We did an acquisition. It was it was small, wasn't widely announced. It, um, in an area related to interfacing with electrical cad systems. So? So we're doing We're expanding the breath of on shape. We're going Maura. Depth in the areas were already in. We have enormous opportunity. Add more features and functions that's in the product. Go to market. You mentioned it global global presence. That's something we were a little light on a year ago. Now we have a team. Dana may not even know what we have a non shape, dedicated team in Barcelona, based in Barcelona but throughout Europe were doing multiple languages. Um, the academic program just introduced a new product into that space. That's that's even fueling more success and growth there, Um, and of course, continuing to to invest in customer success. And this Atlas platform story I keep mentioning, we're going to soon have We're gonna soon have four other major PTC brands shipping products on our Atlas Saas platform. And so we're really excited about that. That's good for the other PTC products. It's also good for on shape because now there's there's. There's other interesting products that are on shape customers can use take advantage of very easily using, say, a common log in conventions about user experience there used to invest of all their SAS based, so they that makes it easier to begin with. So that's some of the exciting things going on. I think you'll see P. D. C. Um expanding our lead in saas based applications for this sector for our target sectors, not just in in cat and data management. But another area, PTC's Big and his augmented reality with of euphoria, product line leader and industrial uses of a R. That's a whole other story we should do. A whole nother show augmented reality. But these products are amazing. You can You can help factory workers people on, uh, people who are left out of the digital transformation. Sometimes we're standing from machine >>all day. >>They can't be sitting like we are doing Zoom. They could wear a R headset in our tools. Let them create great content. This is an area Dana is invested in in other companies, but what I wanted to note is the new releases of our authoring software. For this, our content getting released this month, used through the Atlas platform, the SAS components of on shape for things like revision management and collaboration on duh workflow activity. All that those are tools that we're able to share leverage. We get a lot of synergy. It's just really good. It's really fun to We'll have a good time, >>that's awesome. And then we're gonna be talking to John MacLean later about Atlas and do a little deeper dive on that. And, Dana, what is your involvement today with with on shape? But you're looking for you know, which of their customers air actually adopting, and they're gonna disrupt their industries. You get good pipeline from that. How do you collaborate today? >>That sounds like a great idea. Um, a Z John will tell you I'm constantly just ask him for advice and impressions of other entrepreneurs and picking his brain on ideas. No formal relationship clearly, but continue to count John and and John and other people in on shaping in the circle of experts that I rely on for their opinions. >>All right, so we have some questions from the crowd here. Uh, one of the questions is for the dream team. You know, John and Dana. What's your next next collective venture? I don't think we're there yet, are we? No. I >>just say, as Dana said, we love talking to her about. You know, Dana, you just returned the compliment. We would try and give you advice and the deals you're looking at, and I'm sort of casually mentoring at least one of your portfolio entrepreneurs, and that's been a lot of fun for May on hopefully a value to them. But also Dana, We uran important pipeline to us in the world of some new things that are happening that we wouldn't see if you know you've shown us some things that you've said. What do you think of this business? And for us, it's like, Wow, it's cool to see that's going on And that's what's supposed to work in an ecosystem like this. So we we deeply value the ongoing relationship. And no, we're not starting something new. I got a lot of work left to do with what I'm doing and really happy. But we can We can collaborate in this way on other ventures. >>I like this question to somebody asking with the cloud options like on shape, Wilmore students have stem opportunities s Oh, that's a great question. Are you because of sass and cloud? Are you able to reach? You know, more students? Much more cost effectively. >>Yeah, Dave, I'm so glad that that that I was asked about this because Yes, and it's extremely gratifying us. Yes, we are because of cloud, because on shape is the only full cloud full SAS system. Our industry were able to reach stem education brings able to be part of bringing step education to students who couldn't get it otherwise. And one of most gratifying gratifying things to me is the emails were getting from teachers, um, that that really, um, on the phone calls that were they really pour their heart out and say We're able to get to students in areas that have very limited compute resource is that don't have an I T staff where they don't know what computer that the students can have at home, and they probably don't even have a computer. We're talking about being able to teach them on a phone to have an android phone a low end android phone. You could do three D modeling on there with on shape. Now you can't do it any other system, but with on shape, you could do it. And so the teacher can say to the students, They have to have Internet access, and I know there's a huge community that doesn't even have Internet access, and we're not able, unfortunately to help that. But if you have Internet and you have even an android phone, we can enable the educator to teach them. And so we have case after case of saving a stem program or expanding it into the students that need it most is the ones we're helping here. So really excited about that. And we're also able to let in addition to the run on run on whatever computing devices they have, we also offer them the tools they need for remote teaching with a much richer experience. You know, could you teach solid works remotely? Well, maybe if the student ran it had a windows workstation, you know, big, big, high and workstation. Maybe it could, but it would be like the difference between collaborating with on shape and collaborate with solid works. Like the difference between a zoom video call and talking on the landline phone. You know, it's a much richer experience, and that's what you need in stem teaching. Stem is hard. So, yeah, we're super super excited about bringing stem to more students because of clouds. >>Yeah, we're talking about innovation for good, and then the discussion, John, you just had it. Really? There could be a whole another vector here. We could discuss on diversity, and I wanna end with just pointing out So, Dana, your new firm. It's a woman led firm, too. Two women leaders, you know, going forward. So that's awesome to see, so really? Yeah, thumbs up on that. Congratulations on getting that off the ground. Yeah. Thank you. Okay. So thank you guys. Really appreciate It was a great discussion. I learned a lot, and I'm sure the audience did a swell in a moment. We're gonna talk with on shape customers to see how they're applying tech for good and some of the products that they're building. So keep it right there. I'm Dave Volonte. You're watching innovation for good on the Cube, the global leader in digital tech event coverage. Stay right there. Yeah.

Published Date : Dec 10 2020

SUMMARY :

for good, brought to you by on shape. I'm coming to you from our studios outside of Boston. Why did you and your co founders start on shape? market and about, you know, a little Before founding on shape, It's been, you know, when you get acquired, But what I really appreciate is, you know, you're an entrepreneur. And you know, I look back Sure to enjoy And and you were and still are a big believer in industrial transformation. What kept me in the room, you know, in terms of the industrial world was seeing Your investment thesis is and you know, one of the big waves that you're hoping to ride. you know, half of the GDP in the US and have been very under invested. And I want to understand why you feel it's important to be early. so I like to work with founders and teams when they're, you know, And what are you seeing today? you try to eliminate the risk sa's much as you can, but I always say, I don't mind taking a risk You like to bet on I want to thank you again for all that you did it every step of the way from where we started. You know, a few years ago, people were like cloud, you know, in the cova driven new normal. And and but But, you know, the bet was on the SAS model was right for Crick had and I think you know, the closer you get to the shop floor in the production environment. So let's bring it, you know, toe today's you know, You know, I love you and I don't like that term exit. It's not just the technology is how you go to market and the whole business being run and how you support You know, a lot of baggage, you know, our customers pulling you in a lot of different directions you know, just go, go, go and grow, grow, grow where we're looking for this year, the SAS components of on shape for things like revision management How do you collaborate today? Um, a Z John will tell you I'm constantly one of the questions is for the dream team. the world of some new things that are happening that we wouldn't see if you know you've shown us some things that you've said. I like this question to somebody asking with the cloud options like on shape, Wilmore students have stem opportunities Well, maybe if the student ran it had a windows workstation, you know, big, Two women leaders, you know, going forward.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DanaPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

Jim HemplemanPERSON

0.99+

Dana GraysonPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Dave VolontePERSON

0.99+

Dave ValentinPERSON

0.99+

JimPERSON

0.99+

DennisPERSON

0.99+

David DayPERSON

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

John HerstekPERSON

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

John MacLeanPERSON

0.99+

Dana JohnPERSON

0.99+

Construct CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jon HrschtickPERSON

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

ThioPERSON

0.99+

Dayna GraysonPERSON

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

seven yearQUANTITY

0.99+

PTCORGANIZATION

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

thousands of filesQUANTITY

0.99+

SuffersORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

androidTITLE

0.99+

one fileQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

SASORGANIZATION

0.98+

MayDATE

0.98+

two wayQUANTITY

0.98+

early ninetiesDATE

0.98+

OnshapePERSON

0.98+

one yearQUANTITY

0.98+

SiriTITLE

0.98+

Two womenQUANTITY

0.98+

first yearQUANTITY

0.98+

late ninetiesDATE

0.98+

a year agoDATE

0.97+

this yearDATE

0.97+

Jeff Clarke, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2020


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Dell Technologies. World Digital Experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Welcome back to the cubes. Continuing coverage of Dell Technology World del Tech, World 2020. Jeff Clark is here. He is the chief operating officer and vice chairman of Dell Technologies. Jeff, awesome to see you. Thanks for coming on. >>Thanks for having me today. Appreciate it. >>Yeah, you're very welcome. When my first question is, when do you have time to be vice chairman? Well, >>you know, in today's world, it's pretty hectic. We're all working around the clock. If there's anything about the new norm, there are no boundaries. And unless you establish some boundaries so I've been able to find a rhythm that works for me personally, but also allows me to look after the company and, uh, kind of keep things moving and making progress of Dell. So pretty exciting times. It's certainly been a challenge finding new ways to break through new ways to get things done. But our team has done a great job rising to the occasion. >>Well, you know, a Z. You know, I didn't know you that well prior to you taking over the whole enchilada and do it going back into the enterprise. I mean, I knew you were obviously, but you have been able to see you know, how you operate in the decision making on how you rally the troops. Your several years now into the new Dell, you had to do a lot of tactical things, you know, including product portfolio rationalizations. But I wanted to start with the macro picture in a particular Can you share some of the acceleration points and the levers that you're really pulling in the operation? >>Well, clearly, if you look back at the company's strategy and I'll start there and then kind of build on from that platform if you think about the first tenet of our strategy is to win in the consolidation in our court marketplaces. So the core commercial PC market, the course server market in the course storage market, and clearly what we've been able to do and certainly been at this now for Gosh, I think it's three years now that we've been turning over the portfolio and modernizing the portfolio on the I s g side and to the point you referenced earlier. We've now modernized that portfolio. It is now under all the power brand and now represents new, fresh modern architecture er modern products that allows us to be competitive going forward across the entire eyes. T portfolio. We've had continued success on the commercial PC side. Then if you think about the next tenant of our strategy, which is to really build deeply integrated solutions across the Dell Technologies portfolio, we've made a lot of progress in the last handful of years, particularly integrating this new competitiveness of our I S G portfolio with the M R. And we're now beginning to see the fruits of that labor PC side will quickly. You've seen that with unified workspace work workspace one are leading services and are leading PC products to be able to bring a different change experience for end users on the PC side on the side. This all started with getting again this competitive portfolio. It started with Dell Technology Cloud a little over a year ago. It now is in joint collaboration around the edge. You've heard from my comments during the keynote around five g going forward. So as we think about this new modern world playing out. We now have the infrastructure competitive. We have a great asset and capability with VM, are now have figured out how to tightly integrate those and innovate on top of those platforms. And we think that's sort of the success for the future as we move forward. >>So it sounds like I mean, covitz change so many things, but it doesn't sound like it's materially changed your thinking on these leverage points or your strategy is gonna pre cove in Post Cove. It you kind of sort of approaching the same playbook, if you will. >>Well, a covert in many levels. While it's had a huge impact on many lives around the world, which we shouldn't, that should not be lost on any of us and the impact that it's had across many businesses and many parts of the world. If you step back and what I try to mention the keynote, what cove it has done is really accelerate digital transformation. I've heard many characterizations, but the way I tend to look at it is if you think of what's happened around us and the forcing of working remote learning remote the world as we look at it going forward, data driven. It's accelerated 10 years of what I thought would take us to get done into the first half of this decade. In many cases the first three years, Uh, this nomenclature that I've talk about is the future is now, and what it's really done is actually reinforced. The points that we thought were going toe happen brought them sooner and has made us believe mawr double down, if you will, that the path we're on is the right path, and we see our customers migrating that way rapidly. In fact, what's interesting? If you look at customers who embrace digital transformation earlier, we call them digital leaders. They're actually breaking away from the pack, sort of speak from their peer set and driving differentiated performance in their sector. We think that's a great, obviously proof point of digital transformation. But what all companies will have to go through to compete >>Well, it's interesting we saw early on in the US locked down worldwide, locked down you have you have such a broad portfolio that yeah, maybe some parts of the portfolio or, you know, directly negatively affected. Certainly. For instance, your you know your airline customers or your hospitality customers, etcetera. But the work from home was was a tailwind for you guys. So the fact that you have that broad portfolio somewhat, you know, one part of the business that cushioned you, maybe the other part of the business, You felt that. But on balance, you're able to get through that, and part of that was your supply chain. And some of your competitors struggled, you know, for instance, with laptop supplies. But you guys really have done a good job, sort of navigating through that, almost like you've been through it before. But nobody's been through this before. >>No, you know, David, thanks for recognizing it. One of the benefits of the Indian portfolio we have, which no one else has. The Indian portfolio that we do. We're able to weather the storm of different impacts to whether it's sectors, whether it's different parts of the business. And we've been able to do that on our our supply chain has performed well. It's been unbelievably resilient. We think it's appointed differentiation over us against anyone else in the marketplace. You couple that with our global service footprint, the two of them working together we designated those capabilities is essential. Very early in the pandemic, we protected our team members and we were able to serve our customers and a pretty non disruptive way. Now, behind the scenes are teams were doing all sorts of things to bring, uh, that continuity supply and those expectations we sent to our customers to the forefront. But I couldn't be more pleased at how we responded, and it set us up to where things were going to go. When we think about the future and migrating tomb or integrated solutions, I suspect we may talk about as a service and the capabilities needed with that services in the supply chain play a key role. >>I guess so much to talk to you about. What? I wanna come back to digital transformation For a minute. I was talking to the C i o the other day and I asked him what was the digital transformation mean to you? He said, David, I got a 15 year old s a P system. Digital transformation means to me I My business has changed in the last 15 years, but my s a P system Hasn't I gotta bring it up to speed. I have to modernize. So there's a spectrum. On the other hand, if if you're not digital today and you're, say, a restaurant, you can't do business. So what does that spectrum look like of digital transformation to you and your customers? >>Well, I think your examples were very good. I mean, our industries as a long reputation of overhyping, different constructs. The fact is, the world is rapidly digitizing. It's undeniable. If you look at the cost of a sensor and how those sensors air now being placed in everything, all of the data that's being collected as a result, That's certainly the forefront of what's happening. And every business has to deal with that. You mean you can't We talked about hospitality. You got hotel rooms that have sensors in them for lights, for water, for a temperature. You think about what's happening in the finance sector in the amount of data that's being created on the edge of that has to be processed on the edge. You think about smart factory smart hospitals in the amount of technology that's going in to bring those new areas to the forefront. So in my mind. Digital transformation is catching up with where the world's going. We know the world is going from an analog world to a digital world, and as that acceleration, mhm goes faster and faster and faster, which I absolutely we absolutely believe this happening. Companies have to change the business. They have to change their models. They have to figure out how to take all of this data and turn data into information to drive better business outcomes. We tend to get into this digital transformation and everyone to talk about this piece of gear, this piece of gear, this piece of gear. I actually don't spend any time on that. It's where customers are going. What are they doing to really instrument, if you will, the digital world they're going to participate in and have to figure out how to overcome the obstacles and barriers with that to compete in their particular sectors. That's where we come in. We help them help them with certainly the gear part of it, but more importantly, the solution orientation to bring better business outcomes to them, to help them get to where they want to go. Does that help? >>Yes, and it does, and it sort of leads me to the hybrid cloud multi cloud. To me, it's edges all part of that and it's critical for your customers. Digital transformations. I mean, what I mean by that is creating a trusted operating environment across whatever platform you're on, whether you're on Prem when you're in a public cloud, whether you're at the edge, so multi cloud is part of that. You know, I used to think a lot of this stuff was aspirational. It seems to becoming more and more really. Where do you see your customers in that maturity cycle? >>Well, I love the way you described it. What we see is the notion of Cloud is much broader than perhaps we would have talked about earlier on when I got this job was the public cloud. No, there's Public Cloud. There's private clouds, and clearly the edge is going to be a cloud operating a model. In fact, we see the world of five G edge and cloud, those three circles intersecting toe high degree. So we're gonna bring a cloud operating model to the edge. We're gonna bring new advanced connectivity data driven connective ity to this edge where all of this instrumentation and all of this data is going to be created that will have toe have real time analytics done, uh, at the edge we think, is this opportunity to really step back and go well. Those cloud things can't be separate. They have to be a set of systems. In fact, it has to become an integrated system. And we think that integrated system has to be able to move data, be able to consistently manage, consistently orchestrate and consistently Dr Operations across those three cloud environments, I think we have gone. Probably the best characterization is early innings. We're certainly not in the first inning. We're not in the ninth inning, but we're certainly into the ballgame here of helping customers orchestrate a multi cloud hybrid cloud environment. If you think about what we've done with VM wars enablement or interaction with the public domains, the work that we've done from our private area, we have accomplished a lot in a short period of time, I'd also tell you there's a fair amount of work in front of us as this spends very quickly and the edge of balls we have to connect those worlds and not leave the edge out on an island by itself. We have to bring it together. We're bringing into the public and private cloud domains that we have today, >>and I definitely wanna hit on as a service. But since we're on this topic, I wanna I wanna talk about five G and Telco a little bit. Let me just spiel for a bit and then you can respond. So I mean, this seems to be a lot of confusion around five G. There's very high expectations. There's there's a there's a lot of talk, but if it's hard toe sort of identify the true impact, that's that's tangible today, anyway. And then you got the telecom telco transformation going on. We've been We've been hearing this for a long, long time. Meanwhile, you got the over over the top providers. They're living off the infrastructure. The telcos price per bit is declining, but the usage is exploding. And so what do you make of all this? You know, the telcos air reinventing themselves. Five g is a part of that consumers Airway waiting for that. There's a lot of, you know, mixed marketing messages going on. What's your take on this and what's tells role? >>Well, look, I I tend to try to break it down into things. At least I can understand. If I look at five G is the next generation Cellular, which I believe it's far more than that. I mean, I think it's the next data fabric for the data era. I think it's going to be this intersection, as I mentioned moments ago of five g Cloud and Edge, all coming together. But I think about it from the infrastructure side that you describe. What we have is the first opportunity to bring a cloud environment to the telco space that hasn't happened before. And I think a cloud environment needs to be implemented because I think there are cost pressures in that sector, and this is going to be a way to become more competitive and to bring out new technologies and services much faster. So now if you bring a cloud operating model to this which I believe five g enables, there is now the opportunity to bring, I think, um, or standard based infrastructure rather than the proprietary ones. In the past, we now can bring a industry standard set of architectures was softer to find layers in the stack. And for the first time in the telcos space, you have the ran going through significant transformation. And on my mind, Iran is one of the significant control points in the telco or five g stack, and that is going to be more open. And then we have to think of five. G is just more than a cellular network. I mean, we're gonna have private private five G. So to the degree that it displaces why, if I will be interesting to see and unfold. But there's a huge opportunity now. Is those sensors that I talked about in the digitization of hospitals and factories and cities, all interconnected by a bunch of private five G networks, all working in an interactive combined system way. I think it just lends itself to a solutions orientation, a standardization orientation, a cloud model, and that's sort of what we do. So I get excited. All of what I just said or alluded to is not solved to your point. You've been hearing this discussion for some time, but the opportunity is large for us. It's one of the single biggest largest opportune, single biggest opportunity that we see for Delon View more and we're going to pursue it together. And we think we can take our at scale technologies that we brought to the Enterprise Data Center and bring those to the telco providers in the private five g build out. >>It's amazing, Jeff, when you think about the when you and I started in this business and how far we've come, it's It's just just mind boggling, isn't it? It >>really is. We've been at this a while and things have changed. But again, it's been on this consistent technology curve, this consistent standardization curve, and it's now applying to new sectors >>I want to end with as a service. You mentioned that before and and so you've got actually really growing business in subscriptions? Uh, you got a lot of options for customers, which is good, but sometimes it's confusing. What's the strategy around as a service? What can we expect there? >>Well, one of the things that we've done and you're right, we've made a lot of progress. We launched L Technology on demand last year. We have 2000 plus customers of $1.3 billion revenue run rate, it's growing at 30% so we're pleased. But at the same time, all the data suggest customers we're gonna want to deploy even at a greater rate. So I think I made reference during our keynote. Today, about 75% of the world's data is gonna be created outside of the data center, 75% off the edge. Build out is going to be done as a service, as is half of the infrastructure. So we think we need to take this to the proverbial next level. We announced Project Apex, Project Apex for us to take all of the properties that we have across the company, all of the different activities and to unify them a single effort for as a service model for the Dell company going forward for our entire portfolio. We think the timing is right. We think we have to be able to, if you will project APEC should be translated as the easy button for our customers. It's a way to make things simpler. It's a way to give them the choice they need to drive consistency in the operating model, and that's the path Ron, we're pretty excited about this unification, if you will. Galvanizing across the entire organization with Project Apex. >>Awesome. Listen, I know you're super busy. Appreciate all the time you've given us your You're a fun executive toe. Hang around with a mission, man. I wish we were together, but hopefully, hopefully sometime soon we can We could see each other face to face. >>I would like that very much. I missed the interactions themselves. I appreciate the time today. Thank you, Dave. >>All right, We'll see you, Jeff. Thanks again. All right. Thank you for watching everybody. Keep it right there. We're back with our next guest. It del Technology World 2020. You're watching the Cube.

Published Date : Oct 21 2020

SUMMARY :

World Digital Experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Thanks for having me today. When my first question is, when do you have time to be vice chairman? But our team has done a great job rising to the occasion. I mean, I knew you were obviously, the I s g side and to the point you referenced earlier. It you kind of sort of approaching the same playbook, but the way I tend to look at it is if you think of what's happened around us and the forcing But the work from home was was a tailwind for you guys. Very early in the pandemic, we protected our team members and we were able to serve our customers I guess so much to talk to you about. sector in the amount of data that's being created on the edge of that has to be processed on the edge. Yes, and it does, and it sort of leads me to the hybrid cloud multi cloud. the edge is going to be a cloud operating a model. this seems to be a lot of confusion around five G. There's very high expectations. in the telcos space, you have the ran going through significant transformation. technology curve, this consistent standardization curve, and it's now applying to new sectors What's the strategy around as a service? all of the different activities and to unify them a single effort Appreciate all the time you've given us your You're a fun executive I appreciate the time today. Thank you for watching everybody.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavidPERSON

0.99+

TelcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeff ClarkPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

Jeff ClarkePERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

$1.3 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

ninth inningQUANTITY

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

first questionQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

first inningQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

five GORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

first three yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

RonPERSON

0.98+

singleQUANTITY

0.98+

USLOCATION

0.98+

five G.ORGANIZATION

0.98+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

AirwayORGANIZATION

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

Five gORGANIZATION

0.96+

Project ApexORGANIZATION

0.96+

first opportunityQUANTITY

0.96+

one partQUANTITY

0.95+

about 75%QUANTITY

0.94+

three circlesQUANTITY

0.92+

eachQUANTITY

0.91+

GoshORGANIZATION

0.91+

Dell Technology WorldORGANIZATION

0.89+

five gORGANIZATION

0.88+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.87+

pandemicEVENT

0.86+

first tenetQUANTITY

0.85+

first half of this decadeDATE

0.85+

last 15 yearsDATE

0.84+

telcos airORGANIZATION

0.84+

del Technology World 2020EVENT

0.83+

15 year oldQUANTITY

0.82+

a year agoDATE

0.81+

single effortQUANTITY

0.81+

overDATE

0.8+

2000QUANTITY

0.79+

five GORGANIZATION

0.79+

Technologies World 2020EVENT

0.77+

APECORGANIZATION

0.74+

fiveQUANTITY

0.71+

del TechORGANIZATION

0.69+

IndianOTHER

0.69+

three cloudQUANTITY

0.68+

EdgeTITLE

0.62+

Post CoveORGANIZATION

0.58+

IranORGANIZATION

0.56+

Dell Technology CloudORGANIZATION

0.56+

DelonORGANIZATION

0.54+

CloudTITLE

0.4+

2020DATE

0.35+

CI/CD: Getting Started, No Matter Where You Are


 

>>Hello, everyone. My name is John Jane Shake. I work from Iran. Tous Andi. I am here this afternoon very gratefully with Anders Vulcan, who is VP of technology strategy for cloud bees, a Miranda's partner and a well known company in the space that we're going to be discussing. Anders is also a well known entity in this space, which is continuous integration and continuous delivery. Um, you've seen already today some sessions that focus on specific implementations of continuous integration and delivery, um, particularly around security. And, uh, we think this is a critically important topic for anyone in the cloud space, particularly in this increasingly complicated kubernetes space. To understand, um, Miranda's thanks, Uh, if I can recapitulate our own our own strategy and, uh, and language that with complexity on uncertainty consistently increasing with the depth of the technology stacks that we have to deal with consistently, um um elaborating themselves that navigating this requires, um first three implementation of automation to increase speed, which is what C and C d do. Um, and that this speed ba leveraged toe let us ship and iterate code faster. Since that's ultimately the business that all of us air in one way or another. I would like, I guess, toe open this conversation by asking Onders what does he think of that core strategy? >>You know, I think you know, hitting the security thing, right? Right off the bat. You know, security doesn't happen by accident. You know, security is not something that you know, Like a like a server in a restaurant. You know, Sprinkles a little bit of Parmesan cheese right before they serve you the the food. It's not something you Sprinkle on at the end. It's something that has to be baked in from the beginning, not just in the kitchen, but in the supply chain from from from the very beginning. So the you know it's a feature, and if you don't build it, if you're not going to get an outcome that you're not gonna be happy with and I think the you know it's increasingly it's obviously increasingly important and increasingly visible. You know, the you know, the kinds of security problems that we that we see these days can can be, you know, life altering, for for people that are subject to them and and can be, you know, life or death for a company that that's exposed to it. So it's it's it's very, very important. Thio pay attention to it and to work to achieve that as an explicit outcome of the software delivery process. And I think, you know, C i n c d as as process as tooling as culture plays a big part in that because ah, lot of it has to do with, you know, set things up, right? Um run them the same way over and over, you know, get the machine going. Turned the crane. Now, you wanna you wanna make improvements over over time. You know, it's not just, you know, set it and forget it. You know, we got that set up. We don't have to worry about it anymore, but it really is a question of, you know, get the human out of the loop a lot of the times because if if you're dealing with configuring complex systems, you wanna make sure that you get them set up configured, you know, documented Ideally, you know, as code, whether it's a domain specific language or or something like that. And then that's something that you contest against that you can verify against that you can that you can difficult. And then that becomes the basis for for your, you know, for yourself, for pipelines, for your automation around, you know, kind of the software factory floor. So I think automation is a key aspect of that because it, you know, it takes a lot of the drudgery out of it, for one thing, So now the humans have more time to spend on doing on the on the creative things on the things that we're good at a zoo. Humans and it also make sure that, you know, one of the things that computers are really good at is doing the same thing over and over and over and over. Eso that kind of puts that responsibility into the hands of the entity that that knows how to do that well, which is which is the machine eso I think it's, you know, it's a light. It's a deep, deep topic, obviously, but, you know, automation plays into it. Uh, you know, small batch sizes play into it, you know, being able to test very frequently whether that's testing in. You're kind of you're C I pipeline where you're sort of doing building mostly unit testing, maybe some integration testing, but also in layering in the mawr. Serious kinds of testing in terms of security scanning, penetration, testing, vulnerability, scanning. You know those sorts of things which, you know, maybe you do on every single see I Bill. But most people don't because those things tend toe take a little bit longer on. And you know you want your sea ice cycle to be as fast as possible because that's really in service of the developer who has committed code and wants toe kind of see the thumbs up from the system saying it. And, um, so most organizations most organizations are are are focusing on, you know, making sure that there's a follow on pipeline to follow on set of tests that happened after the C I passes successfully and and that's, you know, where a lot of the security scanning and those sorts of things happen. >>It's a It's an interesting problem. I mean, you mentioned, um, what almost sounds like a Lawrence Lessig Ian kind of idea that, you know, code is law in enterprises today, code particularly see, I code ends up being policy, but At the same time, there's, Ah, it seems to me there's a an alternative peril, which is, as you increase speed, particularly when you become more and more dependent on things like containers and layering technology to provide components and capabilities that you don't have to build yourself to your build pipeline, that there are new vulnerabilities, potentially that creep in and can creep in despite automation. Zor at least 1st. 1st order automation is attempts toe to prevent them from creeping in. You don't wanna you wanna freeze people on a six month old version of a key container image. But on the other hand, if the latest version has vulnerabilities, that could be a problem. >>Yeah, I mean, it's, you know, it's it's a it's a it's a double edged sword. It's two sides of the same coin. I think you know, when I talked to a lot of security people, um, you know, people to do it for a living is supposed to mean I just talk about it, um, that Z not completely true. But, um, the ah, lot of times the problem is old vulnerabilities. The thing that I think keeps a lot of people up at night isn't necessarily that the thing at the tip of the releases for particular, you know, well known open source, library or something like that. But that's gonna burn you all the vast majority of the time. And I want to say, like, 80 85% of the time. The vulnerability is that you that you get hosed by are ones that have been known about for years. And so I think the if I had to pick. So if you know, in that sort of two sides of that coin, if I had to pick, I would say Be aggressive in making sure that your third party dependencies are updated frequently and and continuously right, because that is the biggest, biggest cause of of of security vulnerabilities when it comes to third party code. Um, now you know the famous saying, You know, move fast and break things Well, there's certain things you don't want to break. You know you don't want to break a radiation machine that's going to deliver radio radiotherapy to someone because that will endanger their health. So So those sorts of systems, you know, naturally or subject a little bit more kind of caution and scrutiny and rigor and process those sorts of things. The micro service that I run that shows my little avatar when I log in, that one probably gets a little less group. You know, Andre rightfully so. So I think a lot of it has to do. And somebody once said in a I think it was, Ah, panel. I was on a PR say conference, which was, which was kind of a wise thing to say it was Don't spend a million dollars protecting a $5 assets. You know, you wanna be smart and you wanna you wanna figure out where your vulnerabilities they're going to come from and in my experience, and and you know, what I hear from a lot of the security professionals is pay attention to your supply chain. You're you want to make sure that you're up to date with the latest patches of, of all of your third party, you know, open source or close source. It doesn't really matter. I mean, if anything, you know, open source is is more open. Eso You could inspect things a little bit better than the close source, but with both kinds of streams of code that you consume and and use. You wanna make sure that you're you're more up to date as opposed to a less up to date? Um, that generally will be better. Now, can a new version of the library cause problems? You know, introduce bugs? You know, those sorts of things? Yes. That's why we have tests. That's what we have automated tests, regression, sweets, You know, those sorts of things. And so you wanna, you know, you wanna live in a in a world where you feel the confidence as a as a developer, that if I update this library from, you know, one debt owed at 3 to 1 debt owed at 10 to pick up a bunch of, you know, bug fixes and patches and those sorts of things. But that's not going to break some on demand in the test suites that that will run against that ought to cover that that sort of functionality. And I'd rather be in that world of Oh, yeah, we tried to update to that, but it But it broke the tests and then have to go spend time on that, then say, Oh, it broke the test. So let's not update. And then six months later, you do find out. Oh, geez. There was a problem in one that owed at three. And it was fixed in one. That about four. If only we had updated. Um, you know, you look at the, um you look at some of the highest profile security breaches that are out there that you sort of can trace toe third party libraries. It's almost always gonna be that it was out of date and hadn't been patched. That's so that's my you know, opinionated. Take on that. Sure. >>What are the parts of modern C I c D. As opposed to what one would encounter 56 years ago? Maybe if we can imagine that is being before the micro services and containers revolution really took off. >>You know, I think e think you're absolutely right that, you know, not the whole world is not doing. See, I Yeah, and certainly the whole world is not doing city yet. Um, you know, I think you know, as you say, we kind of live in a little bit of an ivory tower. You know, we live in an echo chamber in a little bit of a bubble Aziz vendors in this space. The truth is that I would say less than 50% of the software organizations out there do real. See, I do real CD. The number's probably less than that. Um, you know, I don't have anything to back that up other than just I talked to a lot of folks and work with, you know, with a lot of organizations and like, Yeah, that team does see I that team does Weekly builds You know, those sorts of things. It's it's really all over the place, Onda. Lot of times there's There's definitely, in my experience, a high correlation there with the amount of time that a team or a code base has been around, and the amount of sort of modern technologies and processes and and and so on that are that are brought to it on. And that sort of makes sense. I mean, if you if you're starting with the green field with a blank sheet of paper, you're gonna adopt, you know, the technologies and the processes and the cultures of today. A knot of 5, 10 15 15 years ago, Um but but most organizations air moving in that direction. Right? Andi, I think you know what? What? What? What's really changed in the last few years is the level of integration between the various tools between the various pieces and the amount of automation that you could bring to bear. I mean, I you know, I remember, you know, five or 10 years ago having all kinds of conversations with customers and prospects and and people of conferences and so on and they said, Oh, yeah, we'd like to automate our our software development life cycle, but, you know, we can't We have a manual thing here. We have a manual thing there. We do this kind of testing that we can automate it, and then we have this system, but it doesn't have any guy. So somebody has to sit and click on the screen. And, you know, and I used to say e used to say I don't accept No for an answer of can you automate this right? Everything. Anything can be automated. Even if you just get the little drinking bird. You know that just pokes the mouse. Everyone something. You can automate it, and I Actually, you know, I had one customer who was like, Okay, and we had a discussion and and and and they said, Well, we had this old Windows tool. We Its's an obscure tool. It's no longer updated, but it's it's it's used in a critical part of the life cycle and it can't be automated. And I said, Well, just install one of those Windows tools that allows you to peek and poke at the, you know, mass with my aunt I said so I don't accept your answer. And I said, Well, unfortunately, security won't allow us to install those tools, Eh? So I had to accept No, at that point, but But I think the big change were one of the biggest changes that's happened in the last few years is the systems now have all I'll have a p i s and they all talk to each other. So if you've gotta, you know, if you if you've got a scanning tool, if you've got a deployment tool, if you have a deployment, you know, infrastructure, you know, kubernetes based or, you know, kind of sitting in front of our around kubernetes thes things. I'll talk to each other and are all automated. So one of the things that's happened is we've taken out a lot of the weight states. A lot of the pauses, right? So if you you know, if you do something like a value stream mapping where you sit down and I'll date myself here and probably lose some of the audience with this analogy. But if you remember Schoolhouse Rock cartoons in in the late seventies, early eighties, there was one which was one of my favorites, and and the guy who did the music for this passed away last year, sadly, But, uh, the it was called How a bill Becomes a Law and they personified the bill. So the bill, you know, becomes a little person and, you know, first time passed by the house and then the Senate, and then the president either signs me or doesn't and or he vetoes, and it really sort of did this and what I always talk about with respect to sort of value stream mapping and talking about your processes, put a GoPro camera on your source codes head, and then follow that source code all the way through to your customer understand all of the stuff that happens to it, including nothing, right? Because a lot of times in that elapsed time, nothing keeps happening, right. If we build software the way we were sorry. If we build cars the way we build software, we would install the radio in a car, and then we would park it in a corner of the factory for three weeks. And then we might remember to test the radio before we ship the car out to the customer. Right, Because that's how a lot of us still develop some for. And I think one thing that's changed in the in the last few years is that we don't have these kind of, Well, we did the bill. So now we're waiting for somebody to create an environment and rack up some hardware and install an operating system and install. You know, this that and the other. You know, that that went from manual to we use Scheffer puppet to do it, which then went to we use containers to do it, which then went to we use containers and kubernetes to do it. So whole swaths of elapsed time in our software development life cycles basically went to nothing, right and went to the point where we can weaken, weaken, configure them way to the left and and and follow them all the way through. And that the artifact that we're delivering isn't necessarily and execute herbal. It could be a container, right? So now that starts to get interesting for us in terms of being able to test against that container scan against that container, def. Against that container, Um, you know, and it, you know, it does bring complexity to in terms of now you've got a layered file system in there. Well, what all is in there, you know, And so there's tools for scanning those kinds of things, But But I think that one of the biggest things that's happened is a lot of the natural pause. Points are no longer natural. Pause points their unnatural pause points, and they're now just delays in yourself for delivery. And so what? What a lot of organizations are working on is kind of getting to the point where those sorts of things get get automated and connected, and that's now possible. And it wasn't 55 or 10 years ago. >>So It sounds like a great deal of the speed benefit, which has been quantified many different ways. But is once you get one of these systems working, as we've all experienced enormous, um, is actually done by collapsing out what would have been unused time in a prior process or non paralyze herbal stuff has been made parallel. >>I remember doing a, uh, spent some time with a customer, and they did a value stream mapping, and they they found out at the end that of the 30 days of elapsed time they were spending three days on task. Everything else was waiting, waiting for a build waiting foran install, waiting for an environment, waiting for an approval, having meetings, you know, those sorts of things. And I thought to myself, Oh, my goodness, you know, 90% of the elapsed time is doing nothing. And I was talking to someone Gene Kim, actually, and I said, Oh my God, it was terrible that these you know, these people are screwed and he says, 0 90%. That's actually pretty good, you know? So So I think you know, if you if you think today, you know, if you If you if you look at the teams that are doing just really pure continuous delivery, you know, write some code committed, gets picked up by the sea ice system and passes through CIA goes through whatever coast, see I processing, you need to do security scanning and so on. It gets staged and it gets pushed into production. That stuff can happen in minutes, right? That's new. That's different. Now, if you do that without having the right automated gates in place around security and and and and those sorts of things you know, then you're living a little bit dangerously, although I would argue not necessarily any more dangerously, than just letting that insecure coat sit around for a week before your shipment, right? It's not like that problem is going to fix itself if you just let it sit there, Um, but But, you know, you definitely operated at a higher velocity. Now that's a lot of the benefit that you're tryingto trying to get out of it, right? You can get stuff out to the market faster, or if you take a little bit more time, you get more out to the market in, in in the same amount of time you could turn around and fix problems faster. Um, if you have a vulnerability, you can get it fixed and pushed out much more quickly. If you have a competitive threat that you need to address, you can you know, you could move that that much faster if you have a critical bug. You know, I mean, all security issues or bugs, sort of by definition. But, you know, if you have a functionality bug, you can you can get that pushed out faster. Eso So I think kind of all factors of the business benefit from from this increase in speed. And I think developers due to because anybody you know, any human that has a context switch and step away from something for for for, you know, duration of time longer than a few minutes, you know, you're gonna you're gonna you're gonna you're gonna have to load back up again. And so that's productivity loss. Now, that's a soft cost. But man, is it Is it expensive and is a painful So you see a lot of benefit there. Think >>if you have, you know, an organization that is just starting this journey What would you ask that organization to consider in orderto sort of move them down this path? >>It's by far the most frequent and almost always the first question I get at the end of the talk or or a presentation or something like that is where do we start? How do I know where to start? And and And there's a couple of answers to that. What one is Don't boil the ocean, right? Don't try to fix everything all at once. You know that because that's not agile, right? The be agile about your transformation Here, you know, pick, pick a set of problems that you have and and make a, you know, basically make a burn down list and and do them in order. So find find a pain point that you have right and, you know, just go address that and and try to make it small and actionable and especially early on when you're trying to affect change. And you're tryingto convinced teams that this is the way to go and you may have some naysayers, or you may have people who are skeptical or have been through these processes before that have been you know failures released, not the successes that they that they were supposed to be. You know, it's important to have some wind. So what I always say is look, you know, if you have a pebble in your shoe, you've got a pain point. You know how to address that. You know, you're not gonna address that by changing out your wardrobe or or by buying a new pair of shoes. You know, you're gonna address that by taking your shoe off, shaking it until the pebble falls out there putting the shoe back on. So look for those kinds of use cases, right? So if you're engineers are complaining that whenever I check in the build is broken and we're not doing see, I well, then let's look at doing C I Let's do see eye, right? If you're not doing that. And for most organizations, you know, setting up C I is a very manageable, very doable thing. There's lots of open source tooling out there. There's lots of commercial tooling out there. Thio do that to do it for small teams to do it for large teams and and everything in between. Um, if the problem is Gosh, Every time we push a change, we break something. You know where every time something works in staging it doesn't work in production. Then you gotta look at Well, how are these systems being configured? If you're If you're configuring them manually, stop automate the configuration of them. Um, you know, if you're if you're fixing system manually, don't you know, as a friend of mine says, don't fix, Repave? Um, you know, you don't wanna, you know, there's a story of, you know how how Google operates in their data centers. You know, they don't they don't go look for a broken disk drive and swap it out. You know, when it breaks, they just have a team of people that, like once a month or something, I don't know what the interval is. They just walked through the data center and they pull out all the dead stuff and they throw it out, and what they did was they assume that if the scale that they operate, things are always going to break physical things are always going to break. You have to build a software to assume that breakage and any system that assumes that we're going to step in when a disk drive is broken and fix it so that we can get back to running just isn't gonna work at scale. There's a similarity. There's sort of ah, parallel to that in in software, which is you know, any time you have these kinds of complex systems, you have to assume that they're gonna break and you have to put the things in place to catch those things. The automated testing, whether it's, you know, whether you have 10,000 tests that you that you've written already or whether you have no tests and you just need to go right, your first test that that journey, you've got to start somewhere. But my answer thio their questions generally always just start small, pick a very specific problem. Build a plan around it, you know, build a burned down list of things that you wanna address and just start working your way down that the same way that you would for any, you know, kind of agile project, your transformation of your own processes of your own internal systems. You should use agile processes for those as well, because if you if you go off for six months and and build something. By the time you come back, it's gonna be relevant. Probably thio the problems that you were facing six months ago. >>A Then let's consider the situation of, ah, company that's using C I and maybe sea ice and C d together. Um, and they want to reach what you might call the next level. Um, they've seen obvious benefits they're interested in, you know, in increasing their investment in, you know and cycles devoted to this technology. You don't have to sell them anymore, but they're looking for a next direction. What would you say that direction should be? I >>think oftentimes what organizations start to do is they start to look at feedback loops. So on DAT starts to go into the area of sort of metrics and analytics and those sorts of things. You know what we're we're always concerned about? You know, we're always affected by things like meantime to recovery. Meantime, the detection, what are our cycle times from, you know, ideation, toe codecommit. What's the cycle? Time from codecommit the production, those sorts of things. And you know you can't change what you don't measure eso so a lot of times the next step after kind of getting the rudimentary zoo of C I Orsini or some combination of both in places start to measure. Stop you, Um, and and then but But there. I think you know, you gotta be smart about it, because what you don't want to do is kind of just pull all the metrics out that exists. Barf them up on the dashboard. And the giant television screens say boom metrics, right. You know, Mike, drop go home. That's the wrong way to do it. You want to use metrics very specifically to achieve outcomes. So if you have an outcome that you want to achieve and you can tie it to a metric start looking at that metric and start working that problem once you saw that problem, you can take that metric. And you know, if that's the metric you're showing on the big you know, the big screen TV, you can pop that off and pick the next one and put it up there. I I always worry when you know a little different when you're in a knock or something like that. When when you're looking at the network stuff and so on. But I'm always leery of when I walk into to a software development organization. You know, just a Brazilian different metrics, this whole place because they're not all relevant. They're not all relevant at the same time. Some of them you wanna look at often, some of them you just want to kind of set an alarm on and make sure that, you know, I mean, you don't go down in your basement every day to check that the sump pump is working. What you do is you put a little water detector in there and you have an alarm go off if the water level ever rises above a certain amount. Well, you want to do the same thing with metrics, right? Once you've got in the water out of your basement, you don't have to go down there and look at it all the time. You put the little detector in, and then you move on and you worry about something else. And so organizations as they start to get a little bit more sophisticated and start to look at the analytics, the metrics, um, start to say, Hey, look, if our if our cycle time from from, you know, commit to deploy is this much. And we want it to be this much. What happens during that time, And where can we take slices out of that? You know, without without affecting the outcomes in terms of quality and so on, or or if it's, you know, from from ideation, toe codecommit. You know what? What can we do there? Um, you start to do that. And and then as you get those sort of virtuous cycles of feedback loops happening, you know, you get better and better and better, but you wanna be careful with metrics, you know, you don't wanna, you know, like I said, you don't wanna barf a bunch of metrics up just to say, Look, we got metrics. Metrics are there to serve a particular outcome. And once you've achieved that outcome, and you know that you can continue to achieve that outcome, you turn it into an alarm or a trigger, and you put it out of sight. And you know that. You know, you don't need to have, like, a code coverage metric prominently displayed you you pick a code coverage number that you're happy with you work to achieve that. Once you achieve it, you just worry about not going below that threshold again. So you can take that graph off and just put a trigger on this as if we ever get below this, you know, raising alarm or fail a build or fail a pipeline or something like that and then start to focus on improving another man. Uh, or another outcome using another matter >>makes enormous sense. So I'm afraid we are getting to be out of time. I want to thank you very much on this for joining us today. This has been certainly informative for me, and I hope for the audience, um, you know, thank you very, very much for sharing your insulin.

Published Date : Sep 15 2020

SUMMARY :

Um, and that this speed ba leveraged toe let us ship and iterate You know, the you know, the kinds of security problems that we that we see these days what almost sounds like a Lawrence Lessig Ian kind of idea that, you know, I think you know, when I talked to a lot of security people, um, you know, What are the parts of modern C I c D. As opposed to what one would encounter I mean, I you know, I remember, you know, five or 10 years ago having all kinds of conversations But is once you get one of these systems working, So So I think you know, if you if you think today, you know, if you If you if you look at the teams that are doing Um, you know, you don't wanna, you know, there's a story of, Um, they've seen obvious benefits they're interested in, you know, I think you know, you gotta be smart about it, you know, thank you very, very much for sharing your insulin.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
John Jane ShakePERSON

0.99+

$5QUANTITY

0.99+

three weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

Gene KimPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

MikePERSON

0.99+

Anders VulcanPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

30 daysQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

IranLOCATION

0.99+

10,000 testsQUANTITY

0.99+

three daysQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

Tous AndiPERSON

0.99+

GoProORGANIZATION

0.99+

less than 50%QUANTITY

0.99+

two sidesQUANTITY

0.99+

3QUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

80QUANTITY

0.99+

late seventiesDATE

0.99+

first testQUANTITY

0.99+

six months laterDATE

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.98+

six months agoDATE

0.98+

CIAORGANIZATION

0.98+

90%QUANTITY

0.98+

SenateORGANIZATION

0.98+

1QUANTITY

0.98+

first questionQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

WindowsTITLE

0.98+

56 years agoDATE

0.98+

GoshPERSON

0.98+

early eightiesDATE

0.98+

AndrePERSON

0.97+

once a monthQUANTITY

0.97+

10QUANTITY

0.97+

one customerQUANTITY

0.97+

10 years agoDATE

0.96+

first threeQUANTITY

0.96+

55DATE

0.95+

fiveDATE

0.95+

this afternoonDATE

0.94+

one thingQUANTITY

0.94+

a weekQUANTITY

0.93+

both kindsQUANTITY

0.92+

Schoolhouse RockTITLE

0.91+

one wayQUANTITY

0.91+

first timeQUANTITY

0.89+

agileTITLE

0.88+

six month oldQUANTITY

0.86+

million dollarsQUANTITY

0.85+

15 years agoDATE

0.84+

Lawrence Lessig IanPERSON

0.83+

MirandaPERSON

0.81+

AndersORGANIZATION

0.81+

5DATE

0.81+

CTITLE

0.79+

BrazilianOTHER

0.78+

SchefferTITLE

0.78+

about fourQUANTITY

0.77+

singleQUANTITY

0.76+

aboutQUANTITY

0.74+

85%QUANTITY

0.73+

C I OrsiniLOCATION

0.72+

0QUANTITY

0.71+

No Matter Where You AreTITLE

0.7+

doubleQUANTITY

0.7+

last few yearsDATE

0.7+

OndaORGANIZATION

0.69+

billTITLE

0.67+

AndiPERSON

0.67+

OndersPERSON

0.64+

favoritesQUANTITY

0.64+

C ITITLE

0.63+

MirandaORGANIZATION

0.63+

for yearsQUANTITY

0.62+

lastDATE

0.62+

minutesQUANTITY

0.61+

DOCKER CLI FINAL


 

>>Hello, My name is John John Sheikh from Iran Tous. Welcome to our session on new extensions for doctors CLI as we all know, containers air everywhere. Kubernetes is coming on strong and the CNC F cloud landscape slide has become a marvel to behold its complexities about to surpass that of the photo. Letha dies used to fabricate the old intel to 86 and future generations of the diagram will be built out and up into multiple dimensions using extreme ultraviolet lithography. Meanwhile, complexity is exploding and uncertainty about tools, platform details, processes and the economic viability of our companies in changing and challenging times is also increasing. Mirant ous, as you've already heard today, believes that achieving speed is critical and that speed results from balancing choice with simplicity and security. You've heard about Dr Enterprise Container Cloud, a new framework built on kubernetes, the less you deploy compliant, secure by default. Cooper nineties clusters on any infrastructure, providing a seamless self service capable cloud experience to developers. Get clusters fast, Justus, you need them, Update them seamlessly. Scale them is needed all while keeping workloads running smoothly. And you've heard how Dr Enterprise Container Cloud also provides all the day one and Day two and observe ability, tools, the integration AP ICE and Top Down Security, Identity and Secrets management to run operations efficiently. You've also heard about Lens, an open source i D for kubernetes. Aimed at speeding up the most banding, tightest inner loop of kubernetes application development. Lens beautifully meets the needs of a new class of developers who need to deal with multiple kubernetes clusters. Multiple absent project sufficiently developers who find themselves getting bogged down and seal I only coop CTL work flows and context switches into and out of them. But what about Dr Developers? They're working with the same core technologies all the time. They're accessing many of the same amenities, including Docker, engine Enterprise, Docker, Trusted registry and so on. Sure, their outer loop might be different. For example, they might be orchestrating on swarm. Many companies are our future of Swarm session talks about the ongoing appeal of swarm and Miranda's commitment to maintaining and extending the capabilities of swarm Going forward. Dr Enterprise Container Cloud can, of course, deployed doctor enterprise clusters with 100% swarm orchestration on computes just Aziza Leah's. It can provide kubernetes orchestration or mixed swarming kubernetes clusters. The problem for Dr Dev's is that nobody's given them an easy way to use kubernetes without a learning curve and without getting familiar with new tools and work flows, many of which involved buoys and are somewhat tedious for people who live on the command line and like it that way until now. In a few moments you'll meet my colleagues Chris Price and Laura Powell, who enact a little skit to introduce and demonstrate our new extended docker CLI plug in for kubernetes. That plug in offers seamless new functionality, enabling easy context management between the doctor Command Line and Dr Enterprise Clusters deployed by Dr Enterprise Container Cloud. We hope it will help Dev's work faster, help them adapt decay. TSA's they and their organizations manage platform coexistence or transition. Here's Chris and Laura, or, as we like to call them, developer A and B. >>Have you seen the new release of Docker Enterprise Container Cloud? I'm already finding it easier to manage my collection of UCP clusters. >>I'm glad it's helping you. It's great we can manage multiple clusters, but the user interface is a little bit cumbersome. >>Why is that? >>Well, if I want to use docker cli with a cluster, I need to download a client bundle from UCP and use it to create a contact. I like that. I can see what's going on, but it takes a lot of steps. >>Let me guess. Are these the steps? First you have to navigate to the web. You i for docker Enterprise Container Cloud. You need to enter your user name and password. And since the cluster you want to access is part of the demo project, you need to change projects. Then you have to choose a cluster. So you choose the first demo cluster here. Now you need to visit the U C p u I for that cluster. You can use the link in the top right corner of the page. Is that about right? >>Uh yep. >>And this takes you to the UCP you. I log in page now you can enter your user name and password again, but since you've already signed in with key cloak, you can use that instead. So that's good. Finally, you've made it to the landing page. Now you want to download a client bundle what you can do by visiting your user profile, you'll generate a new bundle called Demo and download it. Now that you have the bundle on your local machine, you can import it to create a doctor context. First, let's take a look at the context already on your machine. I can see you have the default context here. Let's import the bundle and call it demo. If we look at our context again, you can see that the demo context has been created. Now you can use the context and you'll be able to interact with your UCP cluster. Let's take a look to see if any stacks are running in the cluster. I can see you have a stack called my stack >>in >>the default name space running on Kubernetes. We can verify that by checking the UCP you I and there it iss my stack in the default name space running on Kubernetes. Let's try removing the stack just so we could be sure we're dealing with the right cluster and it disappears. As you can see. It's easy to use the Docker cli once you've created a context, but it takes quite a bit of effort to create one in the first place. Imagine? >>Yes. Imagine if you had 10 or 20 or 50 clusters toe work with. It's a management nightmare. >>Haven't you heard of the doctor Enterprise Container Cloud cli Plug in? >>No, >>I think you're going to like it. Let me show you how it works. It's already integrated with the docker cli You start off by setting it up with your container cloud Instance, all you need to get started is the base. You are all of your container cloud Instance and your user name and password. I'll set up my clothes right now. I have to enter my user name and password this one time only. And now I'm all set up. >>But what does it actually dio? >>Well, we can list all of our clusters. And as you can see, I've got the cluster demo one in the demo project and the cluster demo to in the Demo project Taking a look at the web. You I These were the same clusters we're seeing there. >>Let me check. Looks good to me. >>Now we can select one of these clusters, but let's take a look at our context before and after so we can understand how the plug in manages a context for us. As you can see, I just have my default contact stored right now, but I can easily get a context for one of our clusters. Let's try demo to the plug in says it's created a context called Container Cloud for me and it's pointing at the demo to cluster. Let's see what our context look like now and there's the container cloud context ready to go. >>That's great. But are you saying once you've run the plug in the doctor, cli just works with that cluster? >>Sure. Let me show you. I've got a doctor stack right here and it deploys WordPress. Well, the play it to kubernetes for you. Head over to the U C P u I for the cluster so you can verify for yourself. Are you ready? >>Yes. >>First I need to make sure I'm using the context >>and >>then I can deploy. And now we just have to wait for the deployment to complete. It's as easy as ever. >>You weren't lying. Can you deploy the same stack to swarm on my other clusters? >>Of course. And that should also show you how easy it is to switch between clusters. First, let's just confirm that our stack has reported as running. I've got a stack called WordPress demo in the default name space running on Kubernetes to deploy to the other cluster. First I need to select it that updates the container cloud context so I don't even need to switch contexts, since I'm already using that one. If I check again for running stacks, you can see that our WordPress stack is gone. Bring up the UCP you I on your other cluster so you can verify the deployment. >>I'm ready. >>I'll start the deployment now. It should be appearing any moment. >>I see the services starting up. That's great. It seems a lot easier than managing context manually. But how do I know which cluster I'm currently using? >>Well, you could just list your clusters like So do you see how this one has an asterisk next to its name? That means it's the currently selected cluster >>I'm sold. Where can I get the plug in? >>Just go to get hub dot com slash miran tous slash container dash cloud dash cli and follow the instructions

Published Date : Sep 15 2020

SUMMARY :

built on kubernetes, the less you deploy compliant, secure by default. Have you seen the new release of Docker Enterprise Container Cloud? but the user interface is a little bit cumbersome. I can see what's going on, but it takes a lot of steps. Then you have to choose a cluster. what you can do by visiting your user profile, you'll generate the UCP you I and there it iss my stack It's a management nightmare. Let me show you how it works. I've got the cluster demo one in the demo project and the cluster demo to in Looks good to at the demo to cluster. But are you saying once you've run the plug in the doctor, Head over to the U C P u I for the cluster so you can verify for yourself. And now we just have to wait for the deployment to complete. Can you deploy the same stack to swarm And that should also show you how easy it is to switch between clusters. I'll start the deployment now. I see the services starting up. Where can I get the plug in?

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Laura PowellPERSON

0.99+

ChrisPERSON

0.99+

Chris PricePERSON

0.99+

John John SheikhPERSON

0.99+

LauraPERSON

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

10QUANTITY

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

Aziza LeahPERSON

0.97+

50 clustersQUANTITY

0.97+

docker Enterprise Container CloudTITLE

0.95+

KubernetesTITLE

0.94+

86QUANTITY

0.94+

WordPressORGANIZATION

0.93+

todayDATE

0.92+

oneQUANTITY

0.91+

one timeQUANTITY

0.9+

Docker Enterprise Container CloudTITLE

0.89+

Dr Enterprise Container CloudTITLE

0.88+

first demo clusterQUANTITY

0.88+

MirandaPERSON

0.85+

Iran TousORGANIZATION

0.84+

intelORGANIZATION

0.84+

LensTITLE

0.83+

TSAORGANIZATION

0.83+

Cooper ninetiesORGANIZATION

0.81+

Day twoQUANTITY

0.78+

DrTITLE

0.73+

DockerORGANIZATION

0.73+

first placeQUANTITY

0.71+

WordPressTITLE

0.71+

Enterprise Container CloudCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.65+

LethaPERSON

0.59+

CloudCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.58+

DOCKER CLITITLE

0.57+

MirantTITLE

0.57+

dayQUANTITY

0.55+

TrustedORGANIZATION

0.51+

Dr Enterprise ClustersTITLE

0.47+

Dr EnterpriseTITLE

0.46+

CloudTITLE

0.43+

DrPERSON

0.42+

EnterpriseCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.33+

SwarmORGANIZATION

0.33+

Why Use IaaS When You Can Make Bare Metal Cloud-Native?


 

>>Hi, Oleg. So great of you to join us today. I'm really looking forward to our session. Eso Let's get started. So if I can get you to give a quick intro to yourself and then if you can share with us what you're going to be discussing today >>Hi, Jake. In my name is Oleg Elbow. I'm a product architect and the Doctor Enterprise Container Cloud team. Uh, today I'm going to talk about running kubernetes on bare metal with a container cloud. My goal is going to tell you about this exciting feature and why we think it's important and what we actually did to make it possible. >>Brilliant. Thank you very much. So let's get started. Eso from my understanding kubernetes clusters are typically run in virtual machines in clouds. So, for example, public cloud AWS or private cloud maybe open staff based or VM ware V sphere. So why why would you go off and run it on their mettle? >>Well, uh, the Doctor Enterprise container cloud already can run Coburn eighties in the cloud, as you know, and the idea behind the container clouds to enable us to manage multiple doctor enterprise clusters. But we want to bring innovation to kubernetes. And instead of spending a lot of resources on the hyper visor and virtual machines, we just go all in for kubernetes directly environmental. >>Fantastic. So it sounds like you're suggesting then to run kubernetes directly on their mettle. >>That's correct. >>Fantastic and without a hyper visor layer. >>Yes, we all know the reasons to run kubernetes and virtual machines it's in The first place is mutual mutual isolation off workloads, but virtualization. It comes with the performance, heat and additional complexity. Uh, another. And when Iran coordinated the director on the hardware, it's a perfect opportunity for developers. They can see performance boost up to 30% for certain container workloads. Uh, this is because the virtualization layer adds a lot off overhead, and even with things like enhanced placement awareness technologies like Numa or processor opinion, it's it's still another head. By skipping over the virtualization, we just remove this overhead and gained this boost. >>Excellent, though it sounds like 30% performance boost very appealing. Are there any other value points or positive points that you can pull out? >>Yes, Besides, the hyper visor over had virtual machines. They also have some static resource footprint. They take up the memory and CPU cycles and overall reintroduces the density of containers per host. Without virtual machines, you can run upto 16% more containers on the same host. >>Excellent. Really great numbers there. >>One more thing to point out directly. Use environmental makes it easier to use a special purpose hardware like graphic processors or virtual no virtual network functions for don't work interfaces or the field programmable gate arrays for custom circuits, Uh, and you can share them between containers more efficiently. >>Excellent. I mean, there's some really great value points you pulled out there. So 30% performance boost, 60% density boost on it could go off and support specialized hardware a lot easier. But let's talk about now. The applications. So what sort of applications do you think would benefit from this The most? >>Well, I'm thinking primarily high performance computations and deep learning will benefit, Uh, which is the more common than you might think of now they're artificial Intelligence is gripping into a lot off different applications. Uh, it really depends on memory capacity and performance, and they also use a special devices like F P G s for custom circuits widely sold. All of it is applicable to the machine learning. Really? >>And I mean, that whole ai piece is I mean, really exciting. And we're seeing this become more commonplace across a whole host of sectors. So you're telcos, farmers, banking, etcetera. And not just I t today. >>Yeah, that's indeed very exciting. Uh, but creating communities closer environmental, unfortunately, is not very easy. >>Hope so it sounds like there may be some challenges or complexities around it. Ondas this, I guess. The reason why there's not many products then out there today for kubernetes on their metal on baby I like. Could you talk to us then about some of the challenges that this might entail? >>Well, there are quite a few challenges first, and for most, there is no one way to manage governmental infrastructures Nowadays. Many vendors have their solutions that are not always compatible with each other and not necessarily cover all aspects off this. Um So we've worked an open source project called metal cube metal cooped and integrated it into the doctor Enterprise Container Cloud To do this unified bar middle management for us. >>And you mentioned it I hear you say is that open source? >>There is no project is open source. We had a lot of our special sauce to it. Um, what it does, Basically, it enables us to manage the hardware servers just like a cloud server Instances. >>And could you go? I mean, that's very interesting, but could you go into a bit more detail and specifically What do you mean? As cloud instances, >>of course they can. Generally, it means to manage them through some sort of a p I or programming interface. Uh, this interface has to cover all aspects off the several life cycle, like hardware configuration, operating system management network configuration storage configuration, Uh, with help off Metal cube. We extend the carbonated C p i to enable it to manage bare metal hosts. And aled these suspects off its life cycle. The mental que project that's uses open stack. Ironic on. Did it drops it in the Cuban. It s a P I. And ironic does all the heavy lifting off provisioned. It does it in a very cloud native way. Uh, it configures service using cloud they need, which is very familiar to anyone who deals with the cloud and the power is managed transparently through the i p my protocol on. But it does a lot to hide the differences between different hardware hosts from the user and in the Doctor Enterprise Container Cloud. We made everything so the user doesn't really feel the difference between bare metal server and cloud VM. >>So, Oleg, are you saying that you can actually take a machine that's turned off and turn it on using the commands? >>That's correct. That's the I. P M I. R Intelligent platform management interface. Uh, it gives you an ability to interact directly with the hardware. You can manager monitor things like power, consumption, temperature, voltage and so on. But what we use it for is to manage the food source and the actual power state of the server. So we have a group of service that are available and we can turn them on. And when we need them, just if we were spinning the VM >>Excellent. So that's how you get around the fact that while aled cloud the ends of the same, the hardware is all different. But I would assume you would have different server configurations in one environment So how would you get around that? >>Uh, yeah, that Zatz. Excellent questions. So some elements of the berm mental management the FBI that we developed, they are specifically to enable operators toe handle wider range of hardware configurations. For example, we make it possible to consider multiple network interfaces on the host. We support flexible partitioning off hard disks and other storage devices. We also make it possible thio boot remote live using the unified extended firmware interface for modern systems. Or just good old bias for for the legacy ones. >>Excellent. So yeah, thanks. Thanks for sharing that that. Now let's take a look at the rest of the infrastructure and eggs. So what about things like networking and storage house that managed >>Oh, Jakey, that's some important details. So from the networking standpoint, the most important thing for kubernetes is load balancing. We use some proven open source technologies such a Zengin ICS and met a little bit to handle. Handle that for us and for the storage. That's ah, a bit more tricky part. There are a lot off different stories. Solutions out. There s o. We decided to go with self and ah cooperator for self self is very much your and stable distributed stories system. It has incredible scalability. We actually run. Uh, pretty big clusters in production with chef and rock makes the life cycle management for self very robust and cloud native with health shaking and self correction. That kind of stuff. So any kubernetes cluster that Dr Underprice Container Cloud provision for environmental Potentially. You can have the self cluster installed self installed in this cluster and provide stories that is accessible from any node in the cluster to any port in the cluster. So that's, uh, called Native Storage components. Native storage. >>Wonderful. But would that then mean that you'd have to have additional hardware so mawr hardware for the storage cluster, then? >>Not at all. Actually, we use Converse storage architecture in the current price container cloud and the workloads and self. They share the same machines and actually managed by the same kubernetes cluster A. Some point in the future, we plan to add more fully, even more flexibility to this, uh, self configuration and enable is share self, where all communities cluster will use a single single self back, and that's that's not the way for us to optimize our very basically. >>Excellent. So thanks for covering the infrastructure part. What would be good is if we can get an understanding them for that kind of look and feel, then for the operators and the users of the system. So what can they say? >>Yeah, the case. We know Doc Enterprise Container Cloud provides a web based user interface that is, uh, but enables to manage clusters. And the bare metal management actually is integrated into this interface and provides provides very smooth user experience. A zone operator, you need to add or enrolled governmental hosts pretty much the same way you add cloud credentials for any other for any other providers for any other platforms. >>Excellent. I mean, Oleg, it sounds really interesting. Would you be able to share some kind of demo with us? It be great to see this in action. Of >>course. Let's let's see what we have here. So, >>uh, thank you. >>Uh, so, first of all, you take a bunch of governmental service and you prepare them, connect and connect them to the network is described in the dogs and bootstrap container cloud on top of these, uh, three of these bare metal servers. Uh, once you put through, you have the container cloud up and running. You log into the u I. Let's start here. And, uh, I'm using the generic operator user for now. Its's possible to integrate it with your in the entity system with the customer and the entity system and get real users there. Mhm. So first of all, let's create a project. It will hold all off our clusters. And once we created it, just switched to it. And the first step for an operator is to add some burr metal hosts of the project. As you see it empty, uh, toe at the berm. It'll host. You just need a few parameters. Uh, name that will allow you to identify the server later. Then it's, ah, user name and password to access the IBM. My controls off the server next on, and it's very important. It's the hardware address off the first Internet port. It will be used to remotely boot the server over network. Uh, finally, that Z the i p address off the i p m i n point and last, but not the least. It's the bucket, uh, toe Assign the governmental host to. It's a label that is assigned to it. And, uh, right now we offer just three default labels or buckets. It's, ah, manager, manager, hosts, worker hosts and storage hosts. And depending on the hardware configuration of the server, you assign it to one of these three groups. You will see how it's used later in the phone, so note that least six servers are required to deploy managed kubernetes cluster. Just as for for the cloud providers. Um, there is some information available now about the service is the result of inspection. By the way, you can look it up. Now we move. Want to create a cluster, so you need to provide the name for the cluster. Select the release off Dr Enterprise Engine and next next step is for provider specific information. You need to specify the address of the Class three guy and point here, and the range of feathers is for services that will be installed in the cluster. The user war close um kubernetes Network parameter school be changed as well, but the defaults are usually okay. Now you can enable or disable stack light the monitoring system for the Burnett's cluster and provide some parameters to eat custom parameters. Uh, finally you click create to create the cluster. It's an empty cluster that we need to add some machines to. So we need a least three manager notes. The form is very simple. You just select the roll off the community snowed. It's either manager of worker Onda. You need to select this label bucket from which the environmental hospital we picked. We go with the manager label for manager notes and work your label for the workers. Uh, while question is deploying, let's check out some machine information. The storage data here, the names off the disks are taken from the environmental host Harbor inspection data that we checked before. Now we wait for servers to be deployed. Uh, it includes ah, operating system, and the government is itself. So uh, yeah, that's that's our That's our you user interface. Um, if operators need to, they can actually use Dr Enterprise Container Container cloud FBI for some more sophisticated, sophisticated configurations or to integrate with an external system, for example, configuration database. Uh, all the burr mental tasks they just can be executed through the carbonated C. P. I and by changing the custom resources customer sources describing the burr mental notes and objects >>Mhm, brilliant. Well, thank you for bringing that life. It's always good. Thio See it in action. I guess from my understanding, it looks like the operators can use the same tools as develops or developers but for managing their infrastructure, then >>yes, Exactly. For example, if you're develops and you use lands, uh, to monitor and manage your cluster, uh, the governmental resources are just another set of custom resources for you. Uh, it is possible to visualize and configure them through lands or any other developer to for kubernetes. >>Excellent. So from what I can see, that really could bridge the gap, then between infrastructure operators on develops and developer teams. Which is which is a big thing? >>Yes, that's that's Ah, one of our aspirations is to unify the user experience because we've seen a lot of these situations when infrastructure is operated by one set of tools and the container platform uses agnostic off it end users and offers completely different set of tools. So as a develops, you have to be proficient in both, and that's not very sustainable for some developers. Team James. >>Sure. Okay, well, thanks for covering that. That's great. E mean, there's obviously other container platforms out there in the market today. It would be great if you could explain only one of some of the differences there and in how Dr Enterprise Container Cloud approaches bare metal. >>Yeah, that's that's a That's an excellent question, Jake. Thank you. So, uh, in container cloud in the container Cloud Burr Mental management Unlike another container platforms, Burr metal management is highly and is tightly integrated in the in the product. It's integrated on the U and the A p I, and on the back and implementation level. Uh, other platforms typically rely on the user to provision in the ber metal hosts before they can deploy kubernetes on it. Uh, this leaves the operating system management hardware configuration hardware management mostly with dedicated infrastructure greater steam. Uh, Dr Enterprise Container Cloud might help to reduce this burden and this infrastructure management costs by just automated and effectively removing the part of responsibility from the infrastructure operators. And that's because container cloud on bare metal is essentially full stack solution. It includes the hardware configuration covers, operating system lifecycle management, especially, especially the security updates or C e updates. Uh, right now, at this point, the only out of the box operating system that we support is you, Bhutto. We're looking to expand this, and, as you know, the doctor Enterprise engine. It makes it possible to run kubernetes on many different platforms, including even Windows. And we plan to leverage this flexibility in the doctor enterprise container cloud full extent to expand this range of operating systems that we support. >>Excellent. Well, Oleg, we're running out of time. Unfortunately, I mean, I've thoroughly enjoyed our conversation today. You've pulled out some excellent points you talked about potentially up to a 30% performance boost up to 60% density boost. Um, you've also talked about how it can help with specialized hardware and make this a lot easier. Um, we also talked about some of the challenges that you could solve, obviously, by using docker enterprise container clouds such as persistent storage and load balancing. There's obviously a lot here, but thank you so much for joining us today. It's been fantastic. And I hope that we've given some food for thoughts to go out and try and deployed kubernetes on Ben. It'll so thanks. So leg >>Thank you for coming. BJ Kim

Published Date : Sep 14 2020

SUMMARY :

Hi, Oleg. So great of you to join us today. My goal is going to tell you about this exciting feature and why we think it's So why why would you go off And instead of spending a lot of resources on the hyper visor and virtual machines, So it sounds like you're suggesting then to run kubernetes directly By skipping over the virtualization, we just remove this overhead and gained this boost. Are there any other value points or positive points that you can pull out? Yes, Besides, the hyper visor over had virtual machines. Excellent. Uh, and you can share them between containers more efficiently. So what sort of applications do you think would benefit from this The most? Uh, which is the more common than you might think And I mean, that whole ai piece is I mean, really exciting. Uh, but creating communities closer environmental, the challenges that this might entail? metal cooped and integrated it into the doctor Enterprise Container Cloud to it. We made everything so the user doesn't really feel the difference between bare metal server Uh, it gives you an ability to interact directly with the hardware. of the same, the hardware is all different. So some elements of the berm mental Now let's take a look at the rest of the infrastructure and eggs. So from the networking standpoint, so mawr hardware for the storage cluster, then? Some point in the future, we plan to add more fully, even more flexibility So thanks for covering the infrastructure part. And the bare metal management actually is integrated into this interface Would you be able to share some Let's let's see what we have here. And depending on the hardware configuration of the server, you assign it to one of these it looks like the operators can use the same tools as develops or developers Uh, it is possible to visualize and configure them through lands or any other developer Which is which is a big thing? So as a develops, you have to be proficient in both, It would be great if you could explain only one of some of the differences there and in how Dr in the doctor enterprise container cloud full extent to expand Um, we also talked about some of the challenges that you could solve, Thank you for coming.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
OlegPERSON

0.99+

Oleg ElbowPERSON

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

JakePERSON

0.99+

FBIORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

JakeyPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

first stepQUANTITY

0.98+

three groupsQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

one setQUANTITY

0.98+

BJ KimPERSON

0.98+

WindowsTITLE

0.97+

up to 30%QUANTITY

0.97+

Doctor EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.96+

IranORGANIZATION

0.93+

threeQUANTITY

0.91+

singleQUANTITY

0.91+

BenPERSON

0.91+

OndaORGANIZATION

0.9+

JamesPERSON

0.9+

EsoORGANIZATION

0.89+

three managerQUANTITY

0.87+

BurnettORGANIZATION

0.86+

One more thingQUANTITY

0.84+

three defaultQUANTITY

0.84+

eachQUANTITY

0.83+

upto 16% moreQUANTITY

0.81+

60% densityQUANTITY

0.79+

single selfQUANTITY

0.76+

up to 60%QUANTITY

0.75+

Zengin ICSTITLE

0.73+

IaaSTITLE

0.73+

six serversQUANTITY

0.72+

HarborORGANIZATION

0.68+

P GTITLE

0.68+

EnterpriseTITLE

0.67+

Dr EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.67+

I. P MTITLE

0.64+

threeOTHER

0.64+

upQUANTITY

0.63+

Dr Enterprise Container CloudORGANIZATION

0.63+

DoctorORGANIZATION

0.6+

CubanOTHER

0.58+

Coburn eightiesORGANIZATION

0.58+

toolsQUANTITY

0.56+

ThioPERSON

0.55+

BhuttoORGANIZATION

0.55+

CloudTITLE

0.54+

Doc Enterprise ContainerTITLE

0.5+

Doctor Enterprise ContainerTITLE

0.5+

ZatzPERSON

0.49+

TeamPERSON

0.49+

Container CloudTITLE

0.36+

Speed K8S Dev Ops Secure Supply Chain


 

>>this session will be reviewing the power benefits of implementing a secure software supply chain and how we can gain a cloud like experience with flexibility, speed and security off modern software delivery. Hi, I'm Matt Bentley, and I run our technical pre sales team here. Um Iran. Tous I spent the last six years working with customers on their container ization journey. One thing almost every one of my customers is focused on how they can leverage the speed and agility benefits of contain arising their applications while continuing to apply the same security controls. One of the most important things to remember is that we are all doing this for one reason, and that is for our applications. So now let's take a look at how we could provide flexibility all layers of the stack from the infrastructure on up to the application layer. When building a secure supply chain for container focus platforms, I generally see two different mindsets in terms of where the responsibilities lie between the developers of the applications and the operations teams who run the middleware platforms. Most organizations are looking to build a secure yet robust service that fits the organization's goals around how modern applications are built and delivered. Yeah. First, let's take a look at the developer or application team approach. This approach follows Mawr of the Dev ops philosophy, where a developer and application teams are the owners of their applications. From the development through their life cycle, all the way to production. I would refer this more of a self service model of application, delivery and promotion when deployed to a container platform. This is fairly common organizations where full stack responsibilities have been delegated to the application teams, even in organizations were full stack ownership doesn't exist. I see the self service application deployment model work very well in lab development or non production environments. This allows teams to experiment with newer technologies, which is one of the most effective benefits of utilizing containers and other organizations. There's a strong separation between responsibilities for developers and I T operations. This is often do the complex nature of controlled processes related to the compliance and regulatory needs. Developers are responsible for their application development. This can either include doctorate the development layer or b'more traditional throw it over the wall approach to application development. There's also quite a common experience around building a center of excellence with this approach, where we can take container platforms and be delivered as a service to other consumers inside of the I T organization. This is fairly prescriptive, in the manner of which application teams would consume it. When examining the two approaches, there are pros and cons to each process. Controls and appliance are often seen as inhibitors to speak. Self service creation, starting with the infrastructure layer, leads to inconsistency, security and control concerns, which leads to compliance issues. While self service is great without visibility into the utilization and optimization of those environments, it continues the cycles of inefficient resource utilization and the true infrastructure is a code. Experience requires Dev ops related coding skills that teams often have in pockets but maybe aren't ingrained in the company culture. Luckily for us, there is a middle ground for all of this Doc Enterprise Container Cloud provides the foundation for the cloud like experience on any infrastructure without all of the out of the box security and controls that are professional services Team and your operations team spend their time designing and implementing. This removes much of the additional work and worry Run, ensuring that your clusters and experiences are consistent while maintaining the ideal self service model, no matter if it is a full stack ownership or easing the needs of I T operations. We're also bringing the most natural kubernetes experience today with winds to allow for multi cluster visibility that is both developer and operator friendly. Let's provides immediate feedback for the health of your applications. Observe ability for your clusters. Fast context, switching between environments and allowing you to choose the best in tool for the task at hand. Whether is three graphical user interface or command line interface driven. Combining the cloud like experience with the efficiencies of a secure supply chain that meet your needs brings you the best of both worlds. You get Dave off speed with all the security controls to meet the regulations your business lives by. We're talking about more frequent deployments. Faster time to recover from application issues and better code quality, as you can see from our clusters we have worked with were able to tie these processes back to real cost savings, riel efficiency and faster adoption. This all adds up to delivering business value to end users in the overall perceived value. Now let's look at see how we're able to actually build a secure supply chain. Help deliver these sorts of initiatives in our example. Secure Supply chain. We're utilizing doctor desktop to help with consistency of developer experience. Get hub for our source Control Jenkins for a C A C D. Tooling the doctor trusted registry for our secure container registry in the universal control playing to provide us with our secure container run time with kubernetes and swarm. Providing a consistent experience no matter where are clusters are deployed. You work with our teams of developers and operators to design a system that provides a fast, consistent and secure experience for my developers that works for any application. Brownfield or Greenfield monolith or micro service on boarding teams could be simplified with integrations into enterprise authentication services. Calls to get help repositories. Jenkins Access and Jobs, Universal Control Plan and Dr Trusted registry teams and organizations. Cooper down his name space with access control, creating doctor trusted registry named spaces with access control, image scanning and promotion policies. So now let's take a look and see what it looks like from the C I c D process, including Jenkins. So let's start with Dr Desktop from the doctor desktop standpoint, what should be utilizing visual studio code and Dr Desktop to provide a consistent developer experience. So no matter if we have one developer or 100 we're gonna be able to walk through the consistent process through docker container utilization at the development layer. Once we've made our changes to our code will be able to check those into our source code repository in this case, abusing Get up. Then, when Jenkins picks up, it will check out that code from our source code repository, build our doctor containers, test the application that will build the image, and then it will take the image and push it toward doctor trusted registry. From there, we can scan the image and then make sure it doesn't have any vulnerabilities. Then we consign them. So once we signed our images, we've deployed our application to Dev. We can actually test their application deployed in our real environment. Jenkins will then test the deployed application, and if all tests show that is good, will promote the r R Dr and Mr Production. So now let's look at the process, beginning from the developer interaction. First of all, let's take a look at our application as is deployed today. Here, we can see that we have a change that we want to make on our application. So marketing Team says we need to change containerized injure next to something more Miranda's branded. So let's take a look at visual studio coat, which will be using for I D to change our application. So here's our application. We have our code loaded, and we're gonna be able to use Dr Desktop on our local environment with our doctor desktop plug in for visual studio code to be able to build our application inside of doctor without needing to run any command line. Specific tools here is our code will be able to interact with docker, make our changes, see it >>live and be able to quickly see if our changes actually made the impact that we're expecting our application. Let's find our updated tiles for application and let's go and change that to our Miranda sized into next. Instead of containerized in genetics, so will change in the title and on the front page of the application, so that we save. That changed our application. We can actually take a look at our code here in V s code. >>And as simple as this, we can right click on the docker file and build our application. We give it a name for our Docker image and V s code will take care of the automatic building of our application. So now we have a docker image that has everything we need in our application inside of that image. So here we can actually just right click on the image tag that we just created and do run this winter, actively run the container for us and then what's our containers running? We could just right click and open it up in a browser. So here we can see the change to our application as it exists live. So once we can actually verify that our applications working as expected, weaken, stop our container. And then from here, we can actually make that change live by pushing it to our source code repository. So here we're going to go ahead and make a commit message to say that we updated to our Mantis branding. We will commit that change and then we'll push it to our source code repository again. In this case we're using get Hub to be able to use our source code repository. So here in V s code will have that pushed here to our source code repository. And then we'll move on to our next environment, which is Jenkins. Jenkins is gonna be picking up those changes for our application, and it checked it out from our source code repository. So get Hub Notifies Jenkins. That there is a change checks out. The code builds our doctor image using the doctor file. So we're getting a consistent experience between the local development environment on our desktop and then and Jenkins or actually building our application, doing our tests, pushing in toward doctor trusted registry, scanning it and signing our image. And our doctor trusted registry, then 2.4 development environment. >>So let's actually take a look at that development environment as it's been deployed. So here we can see that our title has been updated on our application so we can verify that looks good and development. If we jump back here to Jenkins, will see that Jenkins go >>ahead and runs our integration tests for a development environment. Everything worked as expected, so it promoted that image for production repository and our doctor trusted registry. Where then we're going to also sign that image. So we're signing that. Yes, we have signed off that has made it through our integration tests, and it's deployed to production. So here in Jenkins, we could take a look at our deployed production environment where our application is live in production. We've made a change automated and very secure manner. >>So now let's take a look at our doctor trusted registry where we can see our game Space for application are simple in genetics repository. From here we will be able to see information about our application image that we've pushed into the registry, such as Thean Midge signature when it was pushed by who and then we'll also be able to see the scan results of our image. In this case, we can actually see that there are vulnerabilities for our image and we'll actually take a look at that. Dr Trusted registry does binary level scanning, so we get detailed information about our individual image layers. From here, these image layers give us details about where the vulnerabilities were located and what those vulnerabilities actually are. So if we click on the vulnerability, we can see specific information about that vulnerability to give us details around the severity and more information about what, exactly is vulnerable inside of our container. One of the challenges that you often face around vulnerabilities is how, exactly we would remediate that and secure supply chain. So let's take a look at that and the example that we were looking at the vulnerability is actually in the base layer of our image. In order to pull in a new base layer of our image, we need to actually find the source of that and updated. One of the ways that we can help secure that is a part of the supply chain is to actually take a look at where we get our base layers of our images. Dr. Help really >>provides a great source of content to start from, but opening up docker help within your organization opens up all sorts of security concerns around the origins of that content. Not all images are made equal when it comes to the security of those images. The official images from Docker, However, curated by docker, open source projects and other vendors, one of the most important use cases is around how you get base images into your environment. It is much easier to consume the base operating system layer images than building your own and also trying to maintain them instead of just blindly trusting the content from doctor. How we could take a set >>of content that we find useful, such as those base image layers or content from vendors, and pull that into our own Dr trusted registry using our rearing feature. Once the images have been mirrored into a staging area of our DACA trusted registry, we can then scan them to ensure that the images meet our security requirements and then, based off the scan result, promote the image toe a public repository where we can actually sign the images and make them available to our internal consumers to meet their needs. This allows us to provide a set of curated content that we know a secure and controlled within our environment. So from here we confined our updated doctor image in our doctor trust registry, where we can see that the vulnerabilities have been resolved from a developers point of view, that's about a smooth process gets. Now let's take a look at how we could provide that secure content for developers and our own Dr Trusted registry. So in this case, we're taking a look at our Alpine image that we've mirrored into our doctor trusted registry. Here we're looking at the staging area where the images get temporarily pulled because we have to pull them in order to actually be able to scan them. So here we set up nearing and we can quickly turn it on by making active. Then we can see that our image mirroring will pull our content from Dr Hub and then make it available in our doctor trusted registry in an automatic fashion. So from here, we can actually take a look at the promotions to be able to see how exactly we promote our images. In this case, we created a promotion policy within docker trusted registry that makes it so. That content gets promoted to a public repository for internal users to consume based off of the vulnerabilities that are found or not found inside of the docker image. So are actually users. How they would consume this content is by taking a look at the public to them official images that we've made available here again, Looking at our Alpine image, we can take a look at the tags that exist. We could see that we have our content that has been made available, so we've pulled in all sorts of content from Dr Hub. In this case, we have even pulled in the multi architectural images, which we can scan due to the binary level nature of our scanning solution. Now let's take a look at Len's. Lens provides capabilities to be able to give developers a quick, opinionated view that focuses around how they would want to view, manage and inspect applications to point to a Cooper Days cluster. Lindsay integrates natively out of the box with universal control playing clam bundles so you're automatically generated. Tell certificates from UCP. Just work inside our organization. We want to give our developers the ability to see their applications and a very easy to view manner. So in this case, let's actually filter down to the application that we just deployed to our development environment. Here we can see the pot for application and we click on that. We get instant, detailed feedback about the components and information that this pot is utilizing. We can also see here in Linz that it gives us the ability to quickly switch context between different clusters that we have access to. With that, we also have capabilities to be able to quickly deploy other types of components. One of those is helm charts. Helm charts are a great way to package of applications, especially those that may be more complex to make it much simpler to be able to consume inversion our applications. In this case, let's take a look at the application that we just built and deployed. This case are simple in genetics. Application has been bundled up as a helm chart and has made available through lens here. We can just click on that description of our application to be able to see more information about the helm chart so we can publish whatever information may be relevant about our application, and through one click, we can install our helm chart here. It will show us the actual details of the home charts. So before we install it, we can actually look at those individual components. So in this case, we could see that's created ingress rule. And then it's well, tell kubernetes how to create the specific components of our application. We just have to pick a name space to to employ it, too. And in this case, we're actually going to do a quick test here because in this case, we're trying to deploy the application from Dr Hub in our universal Control plane. We've turned on Dr Content Trust Policy Enforcement. So this is actually gonna fail to deploy because we're trying to deploy application from Dr Hub. The image hasn't been properly signed in our environment. So the doctor can to trust policy enforcement prevents us from deploying our doctor image from Dr Hub. In this case, we have to go through our approved process through our secure supply chain to be able to ensure that we know our image came from, and that meets our quality standards. So if we comment out the doctor Hub repository and comment in our doctor trusted registry repository and click install, it will then install the helm chart with our doctor image being pulled from our GTR, which then has a proper signature, we can see that our application has been successfully deployed through our home chart releases view. From here, we can see that simple in genetics application, and in this case we'll get details around the actual deploy and help chart. The nice thing is that Linds provides us this capability here with home. To be able to see all the components that make up our application from this view is giving us that single pane of glass into that specific application so that we know all the components that is created inside of kubernetes. There are specific details that can help us access the applications, such as that ingress world that we just talked about gives us the details of that. But it also gives us the resource is such as the service, the deployment in ingress that has been created within kubernetes to be able to actually have the application exist. So to recap, we've covered how we can offer all the benefits of a cloud like experience and offer flexibility around dev ups and operations controlled processes through the use of a secure supply chain, allowing our developers to spend more time developing and our operators mawr time designing systems that meet our security and compliance concerns

Published Date : Sep 12 2020

SUMMARY :

So now let's take a look at how we could provide flexibility all layers of the stack from the and on the front page of the application, so that we save. So here we can see the change to our application as it exists live. So here we can So here in Jenkins, we could take a look at our deployed production environment where our application So let's take a look at that and the example that we were looking at of the most important use cases is around how you get base images into your So in this case, let's actually filter down to the application that we just deployed to our development environment.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Matt BentleyPERSON

0.99+

UCPORGANIZATION

0.99+

MawrPERSON

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

CooperPERSON

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

100QUANTITY

0.99+

one reasonQUANTITY

0.99+

two approachesQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

Dr HubORGANIZATION

0.98+

DavePERSON

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

JenkinsTITLE

0.97+

twoQUANTITY

0.97+

LindsORGANIZATION

0.97+

IranLOCATION

0.97+

One thingQUANTITY

0.97+

one developerQUANTITY

0.96+

DACATITLE

0.95+

each processQUANTITY

0.95+

Dr DesktopTITLE

0.93+

one clickQUANTITY

0.92+

single paneQUANTITY

0.92+

both worldsQUANTITY

0.91+

Thean MidgePERSON

0.91+

dockerTITLE

0.89+

three graphical userQUANTITY

0.86+

MantisORGANIZATION

0.85+

last six yearsDATE

0.84+

DrORGANIZATION

0.82+

MirandaORGANIZATION

0.81+

BrownfieldORGANIZATION

0.8+

this winterDATE

0.75+

waysQUANTITY

0.75+

CTITLE

0.74+

one ofQUANTITY

0.74+

LindsayORGANIZATION

0.72+

ingressTITLE

0.71+

AlpineORGANIZATION

0.69+

most important use casesQUANTITY

0.67+

Cooper DaysORGANIZATION

0.66+

JenkinsPERSON

0.65+

mindsetsQUANTITY

0.63+

GreenfieldLOCATION

0.62+

MirandaPERSON

0.62+

RPERSON

0.59+

C A CTITLE

0.59+

LinzTITLE

0.59+

every oneQUANTITY

0.56+

challengesQUANTITY

0.53+

EnterpriseCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.5+

2.4OTHER

0.5+

HubORGANIZATION

0.48+

K8STITLE

0.48+

LensTITLE

0.44+

DocORGANIZATION

0.4+

HelpPERSON

0.39+

DockerORGANIZATION

0.37+

AlpineOTHER

0.35+

Willem du Plessis V1


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Miranda's launchpad 2020 brought to you by more antis. >>Hi, I'm stupid man. And this is the cubes coverage of Miran Tous Launchpad 2020. Happy to welcome to the program First time guest William Do places. He's the head of customer success in operations with Miran Tous William. Thanks so much for joining us, >>Steve. Thanks for two. Thanks for having me. >>Yeah, why don't we start with a little bit? You know, customer success operations. Tell us what that's entail, What's what's under your purview, Right? >>So is everything basically, you know, post sales, right? So after a customer has portions, their their subscription, we basically take it from there Going forward, you know, looking after the relationship with the customer, ensure they you know, the whole, you know, subscription fulfillment element off it. Whether that is just bored with that is to cut the relationship management from a post sales perspective and so on, so forth. So that is basically into end from the point off purchase to the renewal face. Would would would fall with any supporting operations. >>Well, that's such an important piece of the whole cloud conversation. Of course, people, you know, we talked for such a long time cap ex op X. We talk about descriptions and manage services. Of course, has been a riel. You know, growth segment of the market place. Love to hear a little bit, you know, What are you hearing from your customers? And, you know, give us the lay of the land As to the various options that that that Miranda is offering today and we'll get into any of the new pieces also. >>Yeah. So the the the options that we're making available for our customers primary called Prod Care, which is a 24 7 mission critical support subscription. Andi Ops Care, which is a fully managed service offering. Um, what we hear from our customers is is, you know, the the the notion of having a development environment and a production environment with different, you know, sls and entitlements and so on. You know that that that notion is disappearing because your divots chain or pipeline is all connected. So you could just think for yourself. If you have a group of developers like 50 or 100 or 1000 developers that are basically standing there still, because they cannot push code because there's a problem or a new issue on the development cloud. But the development cloud is not. Beings is not seen or is treated as a mission critical platform. You know, those developers are standing date stole, so that is a very expensive problem for a customer at that point in time, so that the whole chain, the whole pipeline that makes part off your your develop cycle, should be seen as one entity. And that's what we've seen in the market at the moment that we're realizing with a large customers that are really embracing the kind of the approach to modern applications. Andi. This is why we're making these options available. Thio, our Doctor Enterprise customers We've been running with them for quite a while on the on the Miranda's cloud platform, which is our Infrastructures service offering on. We've had some great success with that, and we now in a position to make that available to our customers. So it's really providing a customer that true enterprise mission critical regardless of time off they the day of the week availability off support whether that is a my question or whether that is really an outage or a failure. You know, you know, you've got that safety net that is that is online and available for you. Thio to sort Whatever problem you have about, you know, that is from the support perspective, you know. And if we go over into the manage service offering we have for on up Skate that is a really hardened Eitel based, um infrastructure or platform as a service offering that we provide eso. We've had some great success. Like I said on the on the Miranda's cloud platform Peace. And we're now making that available for Doc Enterprise customers as well. So that is taking the whole the whole chain through. We look after the the whole platform for the customer and allow the customer to get on with what is important to them. You know, how do they develop their applications? You know, optimize that for their business instead, off spending their times and keep spending their time on keeping the lights on, so to speak, you know? So we take care of all of that. They have that responsibility over to us on DWI. We manage that as our own and we basically could become an extension of their business. So we have a fully integrated into the environment, the whole logging and not monitoring piece we take over the whole life cycle. Management off the environment. We take over, we do the whole change Management piece Incident Management Incident Management piece on. This whole process is truly transparent to the customer. At no point are they, you know, in the dark what's going on where we're going and we have the and the whole pieces wrapped around Bio customer success Manager which is bringing this whole sense off ownership Onda priority. That customer, you've got a single point of contact that is your business partner and that the only piece, the only metric that that individuals measured on is the success off that customer with our our product. So that in a nutshell, at a very high level what these are. But these offerings are all about >>well, we all know these days how important it is toe, you know, make your developers productive. It's funny listening to you, I think back to the Times where you talked about making sure that it's mission critical environment You know, years ago it was like, Oh, well, the developer just gets whatever old hardware we have, and they do it on their own. Now, of course, you know you want Dev in production toe have a very similar environment. And as you said, those manage services offering and be, you know, so important because we want to be able to shift left, let my platform let my vendors take care of some of the things that's gonna be able to enable me to build my new applications toe, respond to the business and do. In fact, I don't want my developers getting bogged down. So do you have any, You know, what are some of the successes there? How do your customers measure that? They Hey, I'm getting great value for going to manage service. Obviously, you know, you talked about that, That technical manager that helps them there. Anybody that's used, you know, enterprise offerings. There's certain times where it's like, Hey, I use it a lot. Other times it's it's just nice to be there, but, you know, why do you bring us in a little bit? Some of the customers, obviously anonymous. You need Teoh you know, how do they say, You know, this is phenomenal value for my business. >>Yes, it's all. It's all about the focus, right? So you're the customer. 100% focus on what is like I said, important to them, they are not being distracted at any point for, you know, on spending time on infrastructure related or platform related issues they purely focused on. Like I said, that is, that is important to their business. Andi, The successes that we see from that it is, is that we have this integration into into our customers like a seamless approach. We work with them is a true, transparent approach to work with our customers. There's a there's an active dialogue off what they developers want to see from the environment, what the customers want to see from from from the environment, what is working well, what we need to optimize. And that is really seeing ah, really good a approach from from from us and we're seeing some some great successes in it. But it all comes down to the customer is focusing on one thing, and that is on what is important to them on. But is there business instead off. You know, like you said, focusing on the stuff that shoot me, that that should be shift left. >>Yeah. And will, um, is there anything that really stands out when you talk about that? The monitoring that you in the reporting that you give the customers Is it all self serve? You know, how did they set that up and make sure that I'm getting valuable data. That's what what my company needs. >>Yes. So that is where your custom success manager comes in is really how to customize that approach to what fit for the customers. So we've got it in the background, very much automated, but we do the tweaks Thio customize it for for the customer that makes sense for them. Some customers want to see very granular details. Other customers just want a glance over it and look at the the high level metrics what they find important. So it is finding that balance and and understanding what your customer find important, and then put that in a way that makes sense for them Now. That might sound might sound kind of obvious, but it's more difficult than you think to put data from the customer That makes sense to them, uh, in their in their context. And then, you know, be in a position where you can take the information that you receive and give your customer the the runway to plan their the application. You know, where are they trending? So be able. Dutilleux. Look. 3452 quarters 345 months to quarters ahead to say this is where you're going to be. If you continue down this path, we might need to look at shifting direction or shift workload around or at Resource is or or, you know, depending on the situation. But it's all about having that insight going forward, looking forward. Rather, um, instead off, you know, playing things by year end, looking, looking at the year. And now because then that ISS that is done and dusted, really. So it's all about what is coming down the line for us and then be able to to plan for it and have an educated conversation of with with with your customer where they want to go. >>You mentioned that part of this offering is making this available for the Docker Enterprise base. Uh, maybe, if you could explain a little bit as to you know, what's gonna be compelling for for those customers. You know what Laurentis is has built specifically for that base? >>Yeah. So, like I said, this is an offering we have available on our Miranda's cloud platform for quite a while. You've seen some great success from it. Um, we're making it now available for the Doctor Enterprise customers. So it is really a true platform as a service offering, um, on your infrastructure of choice, whether that is on prim or whether that is on public cloud, we don't really care. We'll work with customers whichever way it is. And yeah, Like I said, just give that true platform as a service experience for our customers, Onda allow them to to focus on what's important to them. >>Alright, let me let you have the final word. Will tell us what you want your customers to understand about Iran tous when they leave launchpad this year. >>Yeah, So the main thing the main theme that I want to leave with is is that you know, the the we've made significant progress over the last 62 229 months on the doc enterprise side on. We're now in a position where we're taking the next step in making these offerings available for our customers, and we're really for the customers. That's the handful of custom that we have already. My greater to these offerings with getting some really good feedback from them on it is really helping them just thio thio just to expedite. They they, you know, wherever they're gonna go, whatever they want to want to achieve the, you know, expedite, think goals on bond. It is really there to ensure that we provide a customer or customers a true, um, you know, mission critical feeling, uh, giving them the support they need when they needed at the priority or the severity or the intensity that they need as well as they provide them. The ability to to focus on what is important to them on board. Let us look after the infrastructure and platform for them. >>Well, well, okay. Congratulations on Although the work that the team's done and definitely look forward to hearing more in the future. >>Excellent. Thank you very much for your time. >>Be sure to check out all the tracks for Miranda's launchpad 2020 of course. Powered by Cuba 3. 65. Got the infrastructure. The developers Lots of good content. Both live and on demand. And I'm still minimum. Thank you for watching. Thank you.

Published Date : Sep 9 2020

SUMMARY :

launchpad 2020 brought to you by more antis. He's the head of customer success in operations with Thanks for having me. Tell us what that's entail, What's what's under your purview, Right? So is everything basically, you know, post sales, right? Love to hear a little bit, you know, What are you hearing from your customers? You know, you know, you've got that safety net that is that is online and available for you. Other times it's it's just nice to be there, but, you know, You know, like you said, focusing on the stuff that shoot me, The monitoring that you in the reporting that you give the customers Is it all self serve? the information that you receive and give your customer the the runway Uh, maybe, if you could explain a little bit as to you know, what's gonna be compelling for for Like I said, just give that true platform as a service experience for our customers, Will tell us what you want your customers to understand you know, the the we've made significant progress Congratulations on Although the work that the team's done and definitely look forward to hearing more in the future. Thank you very much for your time. Thank you for watching.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
StevePERSON

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

100QUANTITY

0.99+

EitelORGANIZATION

0.99+

50QUANTITY

0.99+

ThioPERSON

0.99+

1000 developersQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.97+

First timeQUANTITY

0.97+

single pointQUANTITY

0.97+

Miran Tous WilliamORGANIZATION

0.97+

Doc EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.96+

BothQUANTITY

0.95+

MirandaORGANIZATION

0.94+

Doctor EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.92+

DutilleuxPERSON

0.91+

Willem du PlessisPERSON

0.89+

345 monthsQUANTITY

0.89+

Andi Ops CareTITLE

0.87+

OndaORGANIZATION

0.87+

MirandaPERSON

0.84+

DockerORGANIZATION

0.84+

launchpad 2020COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.83+

one entityQUANTITY

0.82+

one thingQUANTITY

0.81+

24 7 missionQUANTITY

0.8+

IranLOCATION

0.8+

yearsDATE

0.8+

Prod CareTITLE

0.79+

LaurentisPERSON

0.79+

62 229 monthsQUANTITY

0.78+

supportQUANTITY

0.7+

3452QUANTITY

0.67+

WilliamPERSON

0.65+

TeohPERSON

0.64+

SkateORGANIZATION

0.64+

DWILOCATION

0.63+

3. 65OTHER

0.62+

AndiPERSON

0.57+

CubaORGANIZATION

0.56+

Tous Launchpad 2020TITLE

0.55+

DoORGANIZATION

0.53+

MiranCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.5+

Breaking Analysis: Market Recoil Puts Tech Investors at a Fork in the Road


 

>> From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR, this is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> The steepest drop in the stock market since June 11th flipped the narrative and sent investors scrambling. Tech got hammered after a two-month run, and people are asking questions. Is this a bubble popping, or is it a healthy correction? Are we now going to see a rotation into traditional stocks, like banks and maybe certain cyclicals that have lagged behind the technology winners? Hello, everyone, and welcome to this week's episode of Wikibon's CUBE Insights powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we want to give you our perspective on what's happening in the technology space and unpack what this sentiment flip means for the balance of 2020 and beyond. Let's look at what happened on September 3rd, 2020. The tech markets recoiled this week as the NASDAQ Composite dropped almost 5% in a single day. Apple's market cap alone lost $178 billion. The Big Four: Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google lost a combined value that approached half a trillion dollars. For context, this number is larger than the gross domestic product for countries as large as Thailand, Iran, Austria, Norway, and even the UAE, and many more. The tech stocks that have been running due to COVID, well, they got crushed. These are the ones that we've highlighted as best positioned to thrive during the pandemic, you know, the work-from-home, SaaS, cloud, security stocks. We really have been talking about names like Zoom, ServiceNow, Salesforce, DocuSign, Splunk, and the security names like CrowdStrike, Okta, Zscaler. By the way, DocuSign and CrowdStrike and Okta all had nice earnings beats, but they still got killed underscoring the sentiment shift. Now the broader tech market was off as well on sympathy, and this trend appears to be continuing into the Labor Day holiday. Now why is this happening, and why now? Well, there are a lot of opinions on this. And first, many, like myself, are relatively happy because this market needed to take a little breather. As we've said before, the stock market, it's really not reflecting the realities of the broader economy. Now as we head into September in an election year, uncertainty kicks in, but it really looks like this pullback was fueled by a combination of an overheated market and technical factors. Specifically, take a look at volatility indices. They were high and rising, yet markets kept rising along with them. Robinhood millennial investors who couldn't bet on sports realized that investing in stocks was as much of a rush and potentially more lucrative. The other big wave, which was first reported by the Financial Times, is that SoftBank made a huge bet on tech and bought options tied to around $50 billion worth of high-flying tech stocks. So the option call volumes skyrocketed. The call versus put ratio was getting way too hot, and we saw an imbalance in the market. Now market makers will often buy an underlying stock to hedge call options to ensure liquidity in these cases. So to be more specific, delta in options is a measure of the change in the price of an option relative to the underlying stock, and gamma is a measure of the volatility of the delta. Now usually, volatility is relatively consistent on both sides of the trade, the calls and the puts, because investors often hedge their bets. But in the case of many of these hot stocks, like Tesla, for example, you've seen the call skew be much greater than the skew in the downside. So let's take an example. If people are buying cheap out of the money calls, a market maker might buy the underlying stock to hedge for liquidity. And then if Elon puts out some good news, which he always does, the stock goes up. Market makers have to then buy more of the underlying stock. And then algos kick in to buy even more. And then the price of the call goes up. And as it approaches it at the money price, this forces market makers to keep buying more of that underlying stock. And then the melt up until it stops. And then the market flips like it did this week. When stock prices begin to drop, then market makers were going to rebalance their portfolios and their risk and sell their underlying stocks, and then the rug gets pulled out from the markets. And that's really why some of the stocks that have run dropped so precipitously. Okay, why did I spend so much time on this, and why am I not freaking out? Because I think these market moves are largely technical versus fundamental. It's not like 1999. We had a double whammy of technical rug pulls combined with poor underlying fundamentals for high-flying companies like CMGI and Internet Capital Group, whose businesses, they were all about placing bets on dot-coms that had no business models other than non-monetizable eyeballs. All right, let's take a look at the NASDAQ and dig into the data a little bit. And I think you'll see what I mean and why I'm not too concerned. This is a year-to-date chart of the NASDAQ, and you can see it bottomed on March 23rd at 6,860. And then ran up until June 11th and had that big drop, but was still elevated at 9,492. And then it ran up to over 12,000 and hit an all-time high. And then you see the big drop. And that trend continued on Friday morning. The NASDAQ Composite traded below 11,000. It actually corrected to 10% of its high, 9.8% to be precise, and then it snapped back. But even at its low, that's still up over 20% for the year. In the year of COVID, would that have surprised you in March? It certainly would have surprised me. So to me, this pullback is sort of a relief. It's good and actually very normal and quite predictable. Now the exact timing of these pullbacks, of course, on the other hand is not entirely predictable. Not at all, frankly, at least for this observer. So the big question is where do we go from here? So let's talk about that a little bit. Now the economy continues to get better. Take a look at the August job report; it was good. 1.4 million new jobs, 340,000 came from the government. That was positive numbers. And the other good news is it translates into a drop in unemployment under 10%. It's now at 8.4%. And this is really good relative to expectations. Now the sell-off continued, which suggested that the market wanted to keep correcting, so that's good. Maybe some buying opportunities would emerge in over the next several months, the market snapped back, but for those who have been waiting, I think that's going to happen. And so that snapback, maybe that's an indicator that the market wants to keep going up, we'll see. But I think there are more opportunities ahead because there's really so much uncertainty. What's going to happen with the next round of the stimulus? The jobs report, maybe that's a catalyst for compromise between the Democrats and the Republicans, maybe. The US debt is projected to exceed 100% of GDP this calendar year. That's the highest it's been since World War II. Does that give you a good feeling? That doesn't give me a good feeling. And when we talk about the election, that brings additional uncertainty. So there's a lot to think about for the markets. Now let's talk about what this means for tech. Well, as we've been projecting for months with our colleagues at ETR, despite what's going on in the stock market and its rise, there's those real tech winners, we still see a contraction in 2020 for IT spend of minus 5 to 8%. And we talk a lot about the bifurcation in the market due to COVID accelerating some of these trends that were already in place, like digital transformation and SaaS and cloud. And then the work-from-home kicks in with other trends like video conferencing and the shift to security spend. And we think this is going to continue for years. However, because these stocks have run up so much, they're going to have very tough compares in 2021. So maybe time for a pause. Now let's take a look at the IT spending macroeconomics. This data is from a series of surveys that ETR conducted to try to better understand spending patterns due to COVID. Those yellow slices of the pies show the percent of customers that indicate that their budgets will be impacted by coronavirus. And you can see there's a steady increase from mid-March, which blend into April, and then you can see the June data. It goes from 63% saying yes, which is very high, to 78%, which is very, very high. And the bottom part of the chart shows the degree of that change. So 22% say no change in the latest survey, but you can see much more of a skew to the red declines on the left versus the green upticks on the right-hand side of the chart. Now take a look at how IT buyers are seeing the response to the pandemic. This chart shows what companies are doing as a result of COVID in another recent ETR survey. Now of course, it's no surprise, everybody's working from home. Nobody's traveling for business, not nobody, but most people aren't, we know that. But look at the increase in hiring freezes and freezing new IT deployments, and the sharp rise in layoffs. So IT is yet again being asked to do more with less. They're used to it. Well, we see this driving an acceleration to automation, and that's going to benefit, for instance, the RPA players, cloud providers, and modern software vendors. And it will also precipitate a tailwind for more aggressive AI implementations. And many other selected names are going to continue to do well, which we'll talk about in a second, but they're in the work-from-home, the cloud, the SaaS, and the modern data sectors. But the problem is those sectors are not large enough to offset the declines in the core businesses of the legacy players who have a much higher market share, so the overall IT spend declines. Now where it gets kind of interesting is the legacy companies, look, they all have growth businesses. They're making acquisitions, they're making other bets. IBM, for example, has its hybrid cloud business in Red Hat, Dell has VMware and it's got work-from-home solutions, Oracle has SaaS and cloud, Cisco has its security business, HPE, it's as a service initiative, and so forth. And again, these businesses are growing faster, but they are not large enough to offset the decline in core on-prem legacy and drive anything more than flat growth, overall, for these companies at best. And by the time they're large enough, we'll be into the next big thing, so the cycle continues. But these legacy companies are going to compete with the upstarts, and that's where it gets interesting. So let's get into some of the specific names that we've been talking about for over a year now and make some comments around their prospects. So what we want to do is let's start with one of our favorites: Snowflake. Now Snowflake, along with Asana, JFrog, Sumo Logic, and Unity, has a highly anticipated upcoming IPO. And this chart shows new adoptions in the database sector. And you can see that Snowflake, while down from the October 19th survey, is far outpacing its competitors, with the exception of Google, where BigQuery is doing very well. But you see Mongo and AWS remain strong, and I'm actually quite encouraged that it looks like Cloudera has righted the ship and you kind of saw that in their earnings recently. But my point is that Snowflake is a share gainer, and we think will likely continue to be one for a number of quarters and years if they can execute and compete with the big cloud players, and that's a topic that we've covered extensively in previous Breaking Analysis segments, and, as you know, we think Snowflake can compete. Now let's look at automation. This is another space that we've been talking about quite a bit, and we've largely focused on two leaders: UiPath and Automation Anywhere. But I have to say, I still like Blue Prism. I think they're well-positioned. And I especially like Pegasystems, which has, for years, been embarking on a broader automation agenda. What this chart shows is net score or spending velocity data for those customers who said they were decreasing spend in 2020. Those red bars that we showed earlier are the ones who are decreasing. And you can see both Automation Anywhere and UiPath show elevated levels within that base where spending is declining, so that's a real positive. Now Microsoft, as we've reported, is elbowing its way into the market with what is currently an inferior point product, but, you know, it's Microsoft, so we can't ignore that. And finally, let's have a look at the all-important security sector, which we've covered extensively and put out a report recently. So what this next chart does is cherry-picks of a few of our favorite names, and it shows the net score or spending momentum and the granularity for some of the leaders and emerging players. All of these players are in the green, as you can see in the upper right, and they all have decent presence in the dataset as indicated by the shared NS. Okta is at the top of the list with 58% net score. Palo Alto, they're a more mature player, but still, they have an elevated net score. CrowdStrike's net score dropped this quarter, which was a bit of a concern, but it's still high. And it followed by SailPoint and Zscaler, who are right there. The big three trends in this space right now are cloud security, identity access management, and endpoint security. Those are the tailwinds, and we think these trends have legs. Remember, net score in this survey is a forward-looking metric, so we'll come back and look at the next survey, which is running this month in the field from ETR. Now everyone on this chart has reported earnings, except Zscaler, which reports on September 9th, and all of these companies are doing well and exceeding expectations, but as I said earlier, next year's compares won't be so easy. Oh, and by the way, their stock prices, they all got killed this week as a result of the rug pull that we explained earlier. So we really feel this isn't a fundamental problem for these firms that we're talking about. It's more of a technical in the market. Now Automation Anywhere and UiPath, you really don't know because they're not public and I think they need to get their house in order so they can IPO, so we'll see when they make it to public markets. I don't think that's an if, that I think they will IPO, but the fact that they haven't filed yet says they're not ready. Now why wouldn't you IPO if you are ready in this market despite the recent pullbacks? Okay, let's summarize. So listen, all you new investors out there that think stock picking is easy, look, any fool can make money in a market that goes up every day, but trees don't grow to the moon and there are bulls and bears and pigs, and pigs get slaughtered. And I can throw a dozen other cliches at you, but I am excited that you're learning. You maybe have made a few bucks playing the options game. It's not as easy as you might think. And I'm hoping that you're not trading on margin. But look, I think there are going to be some buying opportunities ahead, there always are, be patient. It's very hard, actually impossible, to time markets, and I'm a big fan of dollar-cost averaging. And young people, if you make less than $137,000 a year, load up on your Roth, it's a government gift that I wish I could have tapped when I was a newbie. And as always, please do your homework. Okay, that's it for today. Remember, these episodes, they're all available as podcasts, wherever you listen, so please subscribe. I publish weekly on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com, so check that out, and please do comment on my LinkedIn posts. Don't forget, check out etr.plus for all the survey action. Get in touch on Twitter, I'm @dvellante, or email me at david.vellante@siliconangle.com. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, everyone. Be well, and we'll see you next time. (gentle upbeat music)

Published Date : Sep 4 2020

SUMMARY :

bringing you data-driven and the shift to security spend.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

CMGIORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

September 9thDATE

0.99+

SoftBankORGANIZATION

0.99+

March 23rdDATE

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

8.4%QUANTITY

0.99+

Internet Capital GroupORGANIZATION

0.99+

MarchDATE

0.99+

10%QUANTITY

0.99+

AprilDATE

0.99+

9,492QUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

September 3rd, 2020DATE

0.99+

$178 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

October 19thDATE

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

June 11thDATE

0.99+

JuneDATE

0.99+

TeslaORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Friday morningDATE

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

half a trillion dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

58%QUANTITY

0.99+

Blue PrismORGANIZATION

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

1999DATE

0.99+

SeptemberDATE

0.99+

June 11thDATE

0.99+

World War II.EVENT

0.99+

340,000QUANTITY

0.99+

AugustDATE

0.99+

UiPathORGANIZATION

0.99+

6,860QUANTITY

0.99+

22%QUANTITY

0.99+

MongoORGANIZATION

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

two leadersQUANTITY

0.99+

9.8%QUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

63%QUANTITY

0.99+

78%QUANTITY

0.99+

david.vellante@siliconangle.comOTHER

0.99+

AsanaORGANIZATION

0.99+

ZscalerORGANIZATION

0.99+

Sumo LogicORGANIZATION

0.99+

SplunkORGANIZATION

0.99+

around $50 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

DocuSignORGANIZATION

0.99+

ETRORGANIZATION

0.99+

OktaORGANIZATION

0.99+

NASDAQORGANIZATION

0.99+

ZoomORGANIZATION

0.99+

NASDAQ CompositeORGANIZATION

0.99+

JFrogORGANIZATION

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

CrowdStrikeORGANIZATION

0.98+

SailPointORGANIZATION

0.98+

mid-MarchDATE

0.98+

both sidesQUANTITY

0.98+

PegasystemsORGANIZATION

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

under 10%QUANTITY

0.98+

ServiceNowORGANIZATION

0.98+

Financial TimesORGANIZATION

0.98+

this monthDATE

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

SalesforceORGANIZATION

0.98+

less than $137,000 a yearQUANTITY

0.97+

BigQueryORGANIZATION

0.96+

almost 5%QUANTITY

0.96+

Julie Baldwin, SUSE & Mikhail Prudnikov, AWS | SUSECON Digital '20


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with coverage of Susic on digital brought to you by Susan. Right? >>Welcome back. I'm Stew Minuteman. And this is the Cube's coverage of Silicon Digital 20. Really excited to be digging into some of the cloud discussions. I've got two guests joining me now, one from across the pond and one from across the country. So joining me is Billy Baldwin. She is the senior director of Global CSP Alliance sales with Lisa. Coming from across the pond and coming from California is Mikhail Fradkov, who is a principal business development at Amazon Web services. Thank you both for joining us. >>Thank you to really, really exciting. >>All right, So, Julie, obviously, you know, we know we're limit Been proliferating the cloud something that almost I think really understand. You know, cloud, you know, big piece of the overall soussa discussion. Um, bring us inside a little bit, You know your role. And of course, the long partnership that business ad with AWS. >>Yeah. So? So my role is working with, you know, the major hyper scale is in the public cloud providers in offering solutions that's driving digital transformation. And this modernization even more so in today's current climate. We're seeing, you know, modernization transformation is being driven out of necessity. The necessity now due to the yeah, the code 19 impact. So I really want to draw on. You know, we've been working with AWS for the last 10 years. We've serviced, you know, thousands of customers between us who are looking at how they innovate on D drive, you know, flexibility and agility into into their, you know, the right and then there accounts. So it's really important that, you know, we look at how we support our customers from a, uh, and integrated support perspective and how we can we can move them forward in the in the digital transformation journey. >>Awesome. So Mikhail and I want to hear what Julie talked about. I think about when I when I look at AWS, you talk about builders when you go to the conference that Amazon told, you know, innovation is absolutely something there. So talk to us a little bit about how you know the Linux community in general, and to save costs more specifically are engaged. And you know a piece of what AWS is doing. >>Sure, So in general, it's a bless. I'm responsible for making sure that our customers are successful as they go through there. Well, its information Jordan you or business transformation. Jordan is so those those are all involved transformations. And, um, it's It's actually an interesting position to be in because you see it first hand on the ground for all the challenges and all the all the interesting problems that customers get the soul and then it's a sexual incredibly exciting that we're having this conversation in the framework of silicon because open source is incredibly important for a glass and stable beta last week understand how important open source is for customer success, and therefore we've been involved in contributing to the projects from from very early on, that justly mix and a VM and Java and kubernetes. So we see we see a lot of a lot of proliferation in the space and then another. Another interest in I guess below that, I would say, is if you think about the open source notion, which is largely around community, so there is this sort of like a juxtaposition off the cathedral and the bazaar, right, and then so the bazaar is the vibrant community off people, commentaries with ideas, and they're they're pursuing them and they innovate. And so something similar we see in the um yes, it the blast community with several 1,000,000 customers day today. They're sold in challenges and bring in lots of lots of requests for innovation, and I >>want to call it puts >>pressure on Amazon to innovate. But it's a lot of inspiration, right? And then, therefore it's It's interesting to see right that because of all the innovation and all those requests, customers get access on Amazon toe. All the features such as same was open source, Right? So you capitalize on this on this innovation, and you're there is well, customers can request, let's say, in financial service industry and then so you get a lot of security features. All the only controls would say, like I saw saw some combines and then some of the most stringent compliance already, like product guys that say the blessed, that stuff. That's one of the examples. >>Yeah, I e starts are Julie. That customer flywheel that you talked about is what we really want. They're so Julie, you want wanted to comment on what he was saying. >>I was just kind of just to kind of reinforce, you know, that whole community in that whole innovation based as well because from an open source perspective, you know that that sense of community is really driving those changes on with the AWS platform. It's got a very rich functionality behind it. You know, it's one of the, you know, the first time platform. So it does have that degree of innovation, you know, from from Day One. And that's just being driven by the by, the by, our customers who are pushing the envelope family in everyone more on. That's where you know the relationship between, you know, Souza on AWS is really, really started to excel. Looking at how we we move into that container space now as well, and help the customers, you know, modernize not only their, you know, the the cloud native that's going straight to cloud. But how do they modernize modernize their legacy applications as well? Um, and how today, you know, take, you know, take their on premise environments on, make them more effective and more efficient, and by using public cloud to be able to do that. >>Yeah. Julia, I'm glad you brought that up, because absolutely, there's opportunity. But there's challenges there. Customers really have. You know, it's either hybrid or multi cloud deployment. You know, container ization. Kubernetes are absolutely enable is there? But I wonder if you could bring us inside. What Susie doing? You have any customer examples of you know how they're really making this change? We know that it's still the majority of applications have not been modernized. They've not going cloud native. They're not ready for these environments. So how are customers working through this ultimate journey? >>Yeah, I mean, it's really, really complex. And I did a presentation on our sales summit talking about, you know, Gardner's five. Ours about you know, what applications can move to the cloud, how easy it is to do that. And I think there is some research done last year with for like, one, um, where the previous year there was a lot of customers said, Yeah, we're moving to fired and it's easy. And then this year, when they rerun the survey, it was No, it's really hard. We need partners. We need to look at how we how we do this. And so you know, every application is going to be able to be moved hours, and it's really Orton that they know the customers have a strategy and look at what they're doing on prem it and then start to identify what is you know, what is cloud friendly? What do they need to do to kind of go forward? You know, Do they need to be, you know, rewrite an application? Do they need to re factor it kind of just be a lift and shift. And so what we're doing with with AWS is, you know, we've been working with partners like both, for example, who built out to retail application platform to be able to migrate those customers quickly into a more cost effective and efficient way of delivering businesses because they will say, you know, even more so in the current scenario there, you know margins are being squeezed. They need to be looked at being ableto deliver higher, you know, return on investment and to share with any of their, you know, in with their spend. So, you know, that's that's one area that we are kind of like, Look, you know, looking at as well. We've had great success with it. Um, we've also got a quick start programs with with AWS that allows, you know, customers you need to migrate quickly and easily. To be able todo to take those applications on their environments on DNA, move them on to the public cloud. So that so that those are two key areas that we're really looking at, you know, driving. Yeah, they're driving forward because it's critical because it is complex. Um, you need to have a Roma. You need to have a strategy about how you do, and you need to identify and include the stakeholders when they move. You know, when you're changing your environment to make sure that you haven't missed anything, >>something that would love to hear your viewpoint on this to you know, when you look at the Amazon ecosystem, you've got a huge AWS marketplace. Obviously, the integrators help customers work through their various environments and how to modernize them. How to move there, you know, what are you seeing in the customer base, for example, you can help share as to how they're moving along. >>Sure. One of the way we have to understand right, a little bit off the context. So all this all this talk about, let's say, cloud migration and innovation, it's not. It's not an abstract sort of exercise, an absolute discipline. It happens for its right if we look. If you look at the innovative companies at a fast moving companies, effectively, they they see on average time to value metrics about 420 times faster. Then let's say what people slow companies, right? And then So that's That was a lot of pressure on companies to actually embrace, embrace this innovation and the digital transformation and engage with customers in the way that they have never done before, such as just technology enable so many things, so many protect right and then this. With any opportunity it comes, Here comes a challenge on then, as Julie pointed out, it's a it's a difficult exercise. Let's let's not mince words here. So and therefore we have to make sure that everybody is a line. Let's say customer goes through this exercise right that that they're trying to change their processes. The leadership sets new goals. The leadership says new objectives. They have to change the culture they have to train people. So that is that it's not just the challenge of the patient right there within the hour, then outside of the company, you want to make sure that effectively, everybody, everybody comes to the table is there's a lot of value and very much alive, and that just that this is where we see, I guess a lot of, um, a lot of opportunity because as as you go through this process, um, you have to, right, you have to have the right stakeholders who have you have to have trained people, right? And then if you look at another statistics that just 86 companies or so they have a first step and the other 86 infrastructure spend this to on premise And the reason for that is companies cannot not hire and train and train faster, right? So therefore, on AWS side, we we invest a lot in training programs and certification programs as well as we have the vibrant community off partners who can step in and help us with challenges such as we have a system off JIA size and the size, so we have with both hands off the size M s P s, whatever we have providers. And then effectively back to what results here is that you have the synergy. Not not only the change going from from the inside company. >>They >>also have the support structure. As Joe talked about Big Start, we have training and then we have programmatic support, right cattle, how to navigate passengers for that. And then as the switch swollen, you mentioned their new processes. This is this is where the power of the cloud comes in and part of the community. So all those challenges they have been sold. So you can take some of the blueprints and apply them as is. And >>you can you can >>pick and choose what? What? Your bias. So, for example, you can go with cloud native tools with Amazon Web services at the very same time you can. You can also pick products. For example, SuSE Cloud application platform, which provides you with this. I wouldn't call it, um it's slightly more opinionated approach how to how to implement your develops practices and agile practices. And then it's still making Iran's on top of Amazon elastic container service. So yeah, and then, as as Jules mentioned. We program, for example, in the work of success with it >>and just touching on that point because, you know, we talk about we're not islands, you know, we have to engage with the partners. You know, we want to make sure the customer success is at the heart of everything that we do. Um, and we have to bring in the right skill sets at the right time, you know, to to make make that journey as easy as possible and as quickly as possible on. So that's the you know that that's the beauty of community. That's the beauty of partners on benders coming together with the customer at the heart off of everything that they do on. You know, I know that's a very strong message that you're going to get from, you know, from Susie Con. But it's from message that we showed with Aws as well, about how do we do the right thing for the customer and how do we, you know, and how do we enable that success? But then to be successful, which will drive Ultimate six, you know, successes as partners as well? >>Excellent, Julie. One of the big things we're themes we heard in the keynote was talking about the developer community's obviously to say in AWS A lot of developers, anything specific for the developers out there That that either. The highlight >>s so obviously we've got the cloud application platform on. We've got the quick starts as well. So for May is you know, you've got a proven a proven platform with real aws that, you know, the infrastructure available there, the ease of which, you know, cloud application platform can sit on top of that of the eks elastic. The services is really, really critical. And, you know, for me, it would be just, you know, just try it, um, on and give us your feedback as well. I think that's really important, because the way that you know, we drive innovation is through that, you know, the cut, the feedback from our customers and people actually using that, you know, the services. I think McHale pointed to the earlier as well. You know, the innovation that they've seen has been driven by, you know, customers actually saying we want this feature. We want this put pressure on from a from a dev ops community is you know there are alternatives out there and you know, you should, you know, to try. You should try. Look at you know, if that suit your needs better. I look at how you can use a trusted partner like AWS and and Susie Teoh to actually meet some of those new needs they're coming aboard. >>And it's also to Julius Point right? Way cannot overemphasize the importance off builders off people who own on this innovation within the company. And be because the biggest thing that companies can do for their success is to enable builders and as as we mentioned before, right? So the process is this challenging the other multiple parties involved, but the very same time to empower people to drive this change, it's almost like instead of directing them like, Oh, um, the space is pretty pretty interesting analogy. So instead of if you want people to know how to build the ship so you do not you do not tell them. Oh, go gather wood and then, like, this is how you hammer things together. You just you just make sure that they yearn for the C. And then ultimately this is This is what drives the innovation. And here we have essentially with with, for example, Susak Capital radical enable people and they they practice the develops, they can practice, schedule and essentially align. This was this fast time to value practices, right? So that that is the tooling. And then you take weeks starts and then you put literally innovation into into those people's hands, for example, it So that's one big start allows you to bring up the whole environment and pretty much like minutes. Well, let's say if you want to go to innovate on the sisters again, you take big start and then well, is that the takes takes a little bit more involved. So maybe, Like like in an hour and 1/2 you have a safe environment, and then you have essentially start innovating there and >>excellent. Well, Mikhail and Julie thank you so much for the updates. You know, love hearing about innovation companies. Absolutely. Building is what differentiates us is the companies that are ready for today's modern era. So thank you so much for joining us. >>Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. >>Thank you, Julia. >>Alright. We'll be back with lots more coverage from SuSE icon Digital 20. I'm stew minimum. And thank you for watching the Cube. >>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.

Published Date : May 20 2020

SUMMARY :

on digital brought to you by Susan. Thank you both for joining us. cloud, you know, big piece of the overall soussa discussion. So my role is working with, you know, the major hyper scale is in the public cloud providers So talk to us a little bit about how you know the Linux community in general, you see it first hand on the ground for all the challenges and all the all the interesting and then so you get a lot of security features. They're so Julie, you want wanted to comment on what and help the customers, you know, modernize not only their, you know, You have any customer examples of you know and then start to identify what is you know, what is cloud friendly? How to move there, you know, what are you seeing in the customer base, of the company, you want to make sure that effectively, everybody, everybody comes to the table So you can take some of the blueprints and apply them as Amazon Web services at the very same time you can. skill sets at the right time, you know, to to make make that journey as One of the big things we're themes we heard in the keynote was talking about the developer community's You know, the innovation that they've seen has been driven by, you know, customers actually saying we So instead of if you want people to know how to build the ship so you do not So thank you so much for joining us. Thank you. And thank you for watching the Cube. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Mikhail FradkovPERSON

0.99+

MikhailPERSON

0.99+

Billy BaldwinPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

JuliePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Julie BaldwinPERSON

0.99+

JuliaPERSON

0.99+

SusanPERSON

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

JoePERSON

0.99+

SusiePERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

Susie TeohPERSON

0.99+

Mikhail PrudnikovPERSON

0.99+

JulesPERSON

0.99+

86 companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

two guestsQUANTITY

0.99+

Susie Con.PERSON

0.99+

Stew MinutemanPERSON

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

SUSEORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

Amazon WebORGANIZATION

0.99+

86QUANTITY

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

JavaTITLE

0.99+

SouzaPERSON

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

both handsQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

fiveQUANTITY

0.98+

MayDATE

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.97+

Global CSP AllianceORGANIZATION

0.97+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.97+

first stepQUANTITY

0.97+

Susak CapitalORGANIZATION

0.96+

1,000,000 customersQUANTITY

0.96+

first timeQUANTITY

0.95+

SuSEORGANIZATION

0.95+

two key areasQUANTITY

0.95+

about 420 timesQUANTITY

0.95+

Julius PointPERSON

0.94+

an hour and 1/2QUANTITY

0.92+

sixTITLE

0.91+

SuSE CloudTITLE

0.9+

SUSECON DigitalORGANIZATION

0.89+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.89+

IranLOCATION

0.87+

SusicPERSON

0.87+

Big StartORGANIZATION

0.83+

Day OneQUANTITY

0.83+

previous yearDATE

0.82+

JordanPERSON

0.81+

AwsORGANIZATION

0.78+

one areaQUANTITY

0.78+

LinuxTITLE

0.75+

last 10 yearsDATE

0.74+

GardnerPERSON

0.71+

Silicon Digital 20TITLE

0.71+

KubernetesTITLE

0.7+

one bigQUANTITY

0.69+

JordanORGANIZATION

0.66+

firstQUANTITY

0.65+

UNLIST TILL 4/1 - How The Trade Desk Reports Against Two 320-node Clusters Packed with Raw Data


 

hi everybody thank you for joining us today for the virtual Vertica BBC 2020 today's breakout session is entitled Vertica and en mode at the trade desk my name is su LeClair director of marketing at Vertica and I'll be your host for this webinar joining me is Ron Cormier senior Vertica database engineer at the trade desk before we begin I encourage you to submit questions or comments during the virtual session you don't have to wait just type your question or comment in the question box below the slides and click submit there will be a Q&A session at the end of the presentation we'll answer as many questions as we're able to during that time any questions that we don't address we'll do our best to answer them offline alternatively you can visit vertical forums to post your questions there after the session our engineering team is planning to join the forums to keep the conversation going also a quick reminder that you can maximize your screen by clicking the double arrow button in the lower right corner of the slide and yes this virtual session is being recorded and will be available to view on demand this week we'll send you a notification as soon as it's ready so let's get started over to you run thanks - before I get started I'll just mention that my slide template was created before social distancing was a thing so hopefully some of the images will harken us back to a time when we could actually all be in the same room but with that I want to get started uh the date before I get started in thinking about the technology I just wanted to cover my background real quick because I think it's peach to where we're coming from with vertically on at the trade desk and I'll start out just by pointing out that prior to my time in the trade desk I was a tech consultant at HP HP America and so I traveled the world working with Vertica customers helping them configure install tune set up their verdict and databases and get them working properly so I've seen the biggest and the smallest implementations and everything in between and and so now I'm actually principal database engineer straight desk and and the reason I mentioned this is to let you know that I'm a practitioner I'm working with with the product every day or most days this is a marketing material so hopefully the the technical details in this presentation are are helpful I work with Vertica of course and that is most relative or relevant to our ETL and reporting stack and so what we're doing is we're taking about the data in the Vertica and running reports for our customers and we're an ad tech so I did want to just briefly describe what what that means and how it affects our implementation so I'm not going to cover the all the details of this slide but basically I want to point out that the trade desk is a DSP it's a demand-side provider and so we place ads on behalf of our customers or agencies and ad agencies and their customers that are advertised as brands themselves and the ads get placed on to websites and mobile applications and anywhere anywhere digital advertising happens so publishers are what we think ocean like we see here espn.com msn.com and so on and so every time a user goes to one of these sites or one of these digital places and an auction takes place and what people are bidding on is the privilege of showing and add one or more ads to users and so this is this is really important because it helps fund the internet ads can be annoying sometimes but they actually help help are incredibly helpful in how we get much much of our content and this is happening in real time at very high volumes so on the open Internet there is anywhere from seven to thirteen million auctions happening every second of those seven to thirteen million auctions happening every second the trade desk bids on hundreds of thousands per second um so that gives it and anytime we did we have an event that ends up in Vertica that's that's one of the main drivers of our data volume and certainly other events make their way into Vertica as well but that wanted to give you a sense of the scale of the data and sort of how it's impacting or how it is impacted by sort of real real people in the world so um the uh let's let's take a little bit more into the workload and and we have the three B's in spades late like many many people listening to a massive volume velocity and variety in terms of the data sizes I've got some information here some stats on on the raw data sizes that we deal with on a daily basis per day so we ingest 85 terabytes of raw data per day and then once we get it into Vertica we do some transformations we do matching which is like joins basically and we do some aggregation group buys to reduce the data and make it clean it up make it so it's more efficient to consume buy our reporting layer so that matching in aggregation produces about ten new terabytes of raw data per day it all comes from the it all comes from the data that was ingested but it's new data and so that's so it is reduced quite a bit but it's still pretty pretty high high volume and so we have this aggregated data that we then run reports on on behalf of our customers so we have about 40,000 reports per day oh that's probably that's actually a little bit old and older number it's probably closer to 50 or 55,000 reports per day at this point so it's I think probably a pretty common use case for for Vertica customers it's maybe a little different in the sense that most of the reports themselves are >> reports so they're not it's not a user sitting at a keyboard waiting for the result basically we have we we have a workflow where we do the ingest we do this transform and then and then once once all the data is available for a day we run reports on behalf of our customer to let me have our customers on that that daily data and then we send the reports out you via email or we drop them in a shared location and then they they look at the reports at some later point of time so it's up until yawn we did all this work on on enterprise Vertica at our peak we had four production enterprise clusters each which held two petabytes of raw data and I'll give you some details on on how those enterprise clusters were configured in the hardware but before I do that I want to talk about the reporting workload specifically so the the reporting workload is particularly lumpy and what I mean by that is there's a bunch of work that becomes available bunch of queries that we need to run in a short period of time after after the days just an aggregation is completed and then the clusters are relatively quiet for the remaining portion of the day that's not to say they are they're not doing anything as far as read workload but they certainly are but it's much less reactivity after that big spike so what I'm showing here is our reporting queue and the spike is is when all those reports become a bit sort of ailable to be processed we can't we can't process we can't run the report until we've done the full ingest and matching and aggregation for the day and so right around 1:00 or 2:00 a.m. UTC time every day that's when we get this spike and the spike we affectionately called the UTC hump but basically it's a huge number of queries that need to be processed sort of as soon as possible and we have service levels that dictate what as soon as possible means but I think the spike illustrates our use case pretty pretty accurately and um it really as we'll see it's really well suited for pervert icky on and we'll see what that means so we've got our we had our enterprise clusters that I mentioned earlier and just to give you some details on what they look like there they were independent and mirrored and so what that means is all four clusters held the same data and we did this intentionally because we wanted to be able to run our report anywhere we so so we've got this big queue over port is big a number of reports that need to be run and we've got these we started we started with one cluster and then we got we found that it couldn't keep up so we added a second and we found the number of reports went up that we needed to run that short period of time and and so on so we eventually ended up with four Enterprise clusters basically with this with the and we'd say they were mirrored they all had the same data they weren't however synchronized they were independent and so basically we would run the the tailpipe line so to speak we would run ingest and the matching and the aggregation on all the clusters in parallel so they it wasn't as if each cluster proceeded to the next step in sync with which dump the other clusters they were run independently so it was sort of like each each cluster would eventually get get consistent and so this this worked pretty well for for us but it created some imbalances and there was some cost concerns that will dig into but just to tell you about each of these each of these clusters they each had 50 nodes they had 72 logical CPU cores a half half a terabyte of RAM a bunch of raid rated disk drives and 2 petabytes of raw data as I stated before so pretty big beefy nodes that are physical physical nodes that we held we had in our data centers we actually reached these nodes so so it was on our data center providers data centers and the these were these these were what we built our business on basically but there was a number of challenges that we ran into as we as we continue to build our business and add data and add workload and and the first one is is some in ceremony can relate to his capacity planning so we had to prove think about the future and try to predict the amount of work that was going to need to be done and how much hardware we were going to need to satisfy that work to meet that demand and that's that's just generally a hard thing to do it's very difficult to verdict the future as we can probably all attest to and how much the world has changed and even in the last month so it's a it's a very difficult thing to do to look six twelve eighteen eighteen months into the future and sort of get it right and and and what people what we tended to do is we reach or we tried to our art plans our estimates were very conservative so we overbought in a lot of cases and not only that we had to plan for the peak so we're planning for that that that point in time that those number of hours in the early morning when we had to we had all those reports to run and so that so so we ended up buying a lot of hardware and we actually sort of overbought at times and then and then as the hardware were days it would kind of come into it would come into maturity and we have our our our workload would sort of come approach matching the demand so that was one of the big challenges the next challenge is that we were running on disk you can we wanted to add data in sort of two dimensions the only dimensions that everybody can think about we wanted to add more columns to our big aggregates and we wanted to keep our big aggregates for for longer periods of time so both horizontally and vertically we wanted to expand the datasets but we basically were running out of disk there was no more disk in and it's hard to add a disc to Vertica in enterprise mode not not impossible but certainly hard and and one cannot add discs without adding compute because enterprise mode the disk is all local to each of the nodes for most most people you can do not exchange with sands and other external rays but that's there are a number of other challenges with that so um adding in order to add disk we had to add compute and that basically meant kept us out of balance we're adding more compute than we needed for the amount of disk so that was the problem certainly physical nodes getting them the order delivered racked cables even before we even start such Vertica there's lead times there and and so it's also long commitment since we like I mentioned me Lisa hardware so we were committing to these nodes these physical servers for two or three years at a time and I mentioned that can be a hard thing to do but we wanted to least to keep our capex down so we wanted to keep our aggregates for a long period of time we could have done crazy things or more exotic things to to help us with this if we had to in enterprise mode we could have started to like daisy chain clusters together and that would have been sort of a non-trivial engineering effort because we would need to then figure out how to migrate data source first to recharge the data across all the clusters and we had to migrate data from one cluster to another cluster hesitation and we would have to think about how to aggregate run queries across clusters so if you assured data set spans two clusters it would have had to sort of aggregated within each cluster maybe and then build something on top the aggregated the data from each of those clusters so not impossible things but certainly not easy things and luckily for us we started talking about two Vertica about separation of compute and storage and I know other customers were talking to Vertica as we were people had had these problems and so Vertica inyeon mode came to the rescue and what I want to do is just talk about nyan mode really briefly for for those in the audience who aren't familiar but it's basically Vertigo's answered to the separation of computing storage it allows one to scale compute and or storage separately and and this there's a number of advantages to doing that whereas in the old enterprise days when you add a compute you added stores and vice-versa now we can now we can add one or the other or both according to how we want to and so really briefly how this works this slide this figure was taken directly from the verdict and documentation and so just just to talk really briefly about how it works the taking advantage of the cloud and so in this case Amazon Web Services the elasticity in the cloud and basically we've got you seen two instances so elastic cloud compute servers that access data that's in an s3 bucket and so three three ec2 nodes and in a bucket or the the blue objects in this diagram and the difference is a couple of a couple of big differences one the data no longer the persistent storage of the data the data where the data lives is no longer on each of the notes the persistent stores of the data is in s3 bucket and so what that does is it basically solves one of our first big problems which is we were running out of disk the s3 has for all intensive purposes infinite storage so we can keep much more data there and that mostly solved one of our big problems so the persistent data lives on s3 now what happens is when a query runs it runs on one of the three nodes that you see here and assuming we'll talk about depo in a second but what happens in a brand new cluster where it's just just spun up the hardware is the query will will run on those ec2 nodes but there will be no data so those nodes will reach out to s3 and run the query on remote storage so that so the query that the nodes are literally reaching out to the communal storage for the data and processing it entirely without using any data on on the nodes themselves and so that that that works pretty well it's not as fast as if the data was local to the nodes but um what Vertica did is they built a caching layer on on each of the node and that's what the depot represents so the depot is some amount of disk that is relatively local to the ec2 node and so when the query runs on remote stores on the on the s3 data it then queues up the data for download to the nodes and so the data will get will reside in the Depot so that the next query or the subsequent subsequent queries can run on local storage instead of remote stores and that speeds things up quite a bit so that that's that's what the role of the Depot is the depot is basically a caching layer and we'll talk about the details of how we can see your in our Depot the other thing that I want to point out is that since this is the cloud another problem that helps us solve is the concurrency problem so you can imagine that these three nodes are one sort of cluster and what we can do is we can spit up another three nodes and have it point to the same s3 communal storage bucket so now we've got six nodes pointing to the same data but we've you isolated each of the three nodes so that they act as if they are their own cluster and so vertical calls them sub-clusters so we've got two sub clusters each of which has three nodes and what this has essentially done it is it doubled the concurrency doubled the number of queries that can run at any given time because we've now got this new place which new this new chunk of compute which which can answer queries and so that has given us the ability to add concurrency much faster and I'll point out that for since it's cloud and and there are on-demand pricing models we can have significant savings because when a sub cluster is not needed we can stop it and we pay almost nothing for it so that's that's really really important really helpful especially for our workload which I pointed out before was so lumpy so those hours of the day when it's relatively quiet I can go and stop a bunch of sub clusters and and I will pay for them so that that yields nice cost savings let's be on in a nutshell obviously engineers and the documentation can use a lot more information and I'm happy to field questions later on as well but I want to talk about how how we implemented beyond at the trade desk and so I'll start on the left hand side at the top the the what we're representing here is some clusters so there's some cluster 0 r e t l sub cluster and it is a our primary sub cluster so when you get into the world of eon there's primary Club questions and secondary sub classes and it has to do with quorum so primary sub clusters are the sub clusters that we always expect to be up and running and they they contribute to quorum they decide whether there's enough instances number a number of enough nodes to have the database start up and so these this is where we run our ETL workload which is the ingest the match in the aggregate part of the work that I talked about earlier so these nodes are always up and running because our ETL pipeline is always on we're internet ad tech company like I mentioned and so we're constantly getting costly running ad and there's always data flowing into the system and the matching is happening in the aggregation so that part happens 24/7 and we wanted so that those nodes will always be up and running and we need this we need that those process needs to be super efficient and so what that is reflected in our instance type so each of our sub clusters is sixty four nodes we'll talk about how we came at that number but the infant type for the ETL sub cluster the primary subclusters is I 3x large so that is one of the instance types that has quite a bit of nvme stores attached and we'll talk about that but on 32 cores 240 four gigs of ram on each node and and that what that allows us to do I should have put the amount of nvme but I think it's seven terabytes for anything me storage what that allows us to do is to basically ensure that our ETL everything that this sub cluster does is always in Depot and so that that makes sure that it's always fast now when we get to the secondary subclusters these are as mentioned secondary so they can stop and start and it won't affect the cluster going up or down so they're they're sort of independent and we've got four what we call Rhian subclusters and and they're not read by definition or technically they're not read only any any sub cluster can ingest and create your data within the database and that'll all get that'll all get pushed to the s3 bucket but logically for us they're read only like these we just most of these the work that they happen to do is read only which it is which is nice because if it's read only it doesn't need to worry about commits and we let we let the primary subclusters or ETL so close to worry about committing data and we don't have to we don't have to have the all nodes in the database participating in transaction commits so we've got a for read subclusters and we've got one EP also cluster so a total of five sub clusters each so plus they're running sixty-four nodes so that gives us a 320 node database all things counted and not all those nodes are up at the same time as I mentioned but often often for big chunks of the days most of the read nodes are down but they do all spin up during our during our busy time so for the reading so clusters we've got I three for Excel so again the I three incidents family type which has nvme stores these notes have I think three and a half terabytes of nvme per node we just rate it to nvme drives we raid zero them together and 16 cores 122 gigs of ram so these are smaller you'll notice but it works out well for us because the the read workload is is typically dealing with much smaller data sets than then the ingest or the aggregation workbook so we can we can run these workloads on on smaller instances and leave a little bit of money and get more granularity with how many sub clusters are stopped and started at any given time the nvme doesn't persist the data on it isn't persisted remember you stop and start this is an important detail but it's okay because the depot does a pretty good job in that in that algorithm where it pulls data in that's recently used and the that gets pushed out a victim is the data that's least reasons use so it was used a long time ago so it's probably not going to be used to get so we've got um five sub-clusters and we have actually got to two of those so we've got a 320 node cluster in u.s. East and a 320 node cluster in u.s. West so we've got a high availability region diversity so and their peers like I talked about before they're they're independent but but yours they are each run 128 shards and and so with that what that which shards are is basically the it's similar to segmentation when you take those dataset you divide it into chunks and though and each sub cluster can concede want the data set in its entirety and so each sub cluster is dealing with 128 shards it shows 128 because it'll give us even distribution of the data on 64 node subclusters 60 120 might evenly by 64 and so there's so there's no data skew and and we chose 128 because the sort of ginger proof in case we wanted to double the size of any of the questions we can double the number of notes and we still have no excuse the data would be distributed evenly the disk what we've done is so we've got a couple of raid arrays we've got an EBS based array that they're catalog uses so the catalog storage location and I think we take for for EBS volumes and raid 0 them together and come up with 128 gigabyte Drive and we wanted an EPS for the catalog because it we can stop and start nodes and that data will persist it will come back when the node comes up so we don't have to run a bunch of configuration when the node starts up basically the node starts it automatically joins the cluster and and very strongly there after it starts processing work let's catalog and EBS now the nvme is another raid zero as I mess with this data and is ephemeral so let me stop and start it goes away but basically we take 512 gigabytes of the nvme and we give it to the data temp storage location and then we take whatever is remaining and give it to the depot and since the ETL and the reading clusters are different instance types they the depot is is side differently but otherwise it's the same across small clusters also it all adds up what what we have is now we we stopped the purging data for some of our big a grits we added bunch more columns and what basically we at this point we have 8 petabytes of raw data in each Jian cluster and it is obviously about 4 times what we can hold in our enterprise classes and we can continue to add to this maybe we need to add compute maybe we don't but the the amount of data that can can be held there against can obviously grow much more we've also built in auto scaling tool or service that basically monitors the queue that I showed you earlier monitors for those spikes I want to see as low spikes it then goes and starts up instances one sub-collector any of the sub clusters so that's that's how that's how we we have compute match the capacity match that's the demand also point out that we actually have one sub cluster is a specialized nodes it doesn't actually it's not strictly a customer reports sub clusters so we had this this tool called planner which basically optimizes ad campaigns for for our customers and we built it it runs on Vertica uses data and Vertica runs vertical queries and it was it was wildly successful um so we wanted to have some dedicated compute and beyond witty on it made it really easy to basically spin up one of these sub clusters or new sub cluster and say here you go planner team do what you want you can you can completely maximize the resources on these nodes and it won't affect any of the other operations that were doing the ingest the matching the aggregation or the reports up so it gave us a great deal of flexibility and agility which is super helpful so the question is has it been worth it and without a doubt the answer is yes we're doing things that we never could have done before sort of with reasonable cost we have lots more data specialized nodes and more agility but how do you quantify that because I don't want to try to quantify it for you guys but it's difficult because each eon we still have some enterprise nodes by the way cost as you have two of them but we also have these Eon clusters and so they're there they're running different workloads the aggregation is different the ingest is running more on eon does the number of nodes is different the hardware is different so there are significant differences between enterprise and and beyond and when we combine them together to do the entire workload but eon is definitely doing the majority of the workload it has most of the data it has data that goes is much older so it handles the the heavy heavy lifting now the query performance is more anecdotal still but basically when the data is in the Depot the query performance is very similar to enterprise quite close when the data is not in Depot and it needs to run our remote storage the the query performance is is is not as good it can be multiples it's not an order not orders of magnitude worse but certainly multiple the amount of time that it takes to run on enterprise but the good news is after the data downloads those young clusters quickly catch up as the cache populates there of cost I'd love to be able to tell you that we're running to X the number of reports or things are finishing 8x faster but it's not that simple as you Iran is that you it is me I seem to have gotten to thank you you hear me okay I can hear you now yeah we're still recording but that's fine we can edit this so if I'm just talking to the person the support person he will extend our recording time so if you want to maybe pick back up from the beginning of the slide and then we'll just edit out this this quiet period that we have sir okay great I'm going to go back on mute and why don't you just go back to the previous slide and then come into this one again and I'll make sure that I tell the person who yep perfect and then we'll continue from there is that okay yeah sound good all right all right I'm going back on yet so the question is has it been worth it and for us the answer has been a resounding yes we're doing things that we never could have done at reasonable cost before and we got more data we've got this Y note this law has nodes and in work we're much more agile so how to quantify that um well it's not quite as simple and straightforward as you might hope I mean we still have enterprise clusters we've got to update the the four that we had at peak so we've still got two of those around and we got our two yawn clusters but they're running different workloads and they're comprised of entirely different hardware the dependence has I've covered the number of nodes is different for sub-clusters so 64 versus 50 is going to have different performance the the workload itself the aggregation is aggregating more columns on yon because that's where we have disk available the queries themselves are different they're running more more queries on more intensive data intensive queries on yon because that's where the data is available so in a sense it is Jian is doing the heavy lifting for the cluster for our workload in terms of query performance still a little anecdotal but like when the queries that run on the enterprise cluster the performance matches that of the enterprise cluster quite closely when the data is in the Depot when the data is not in a Depot and Vertica has to go out to the f32 to get the data performance degrades as you might expect it can but it depends on the curious all things like counts counts are is really fast but if you need lots of the data from the material others to realize lots of columns that can run slower I'm not orders of magnitude slower but certainly multiple of the amount of time in terms of costs anecdotal will give a little bit more quantifying here so what I try to do is I try to figure out multiply it out if I wanted to run the entire workload on enterprise and I wanted to run the entire workload on e on with all the data we have today all the queries everything and to try to get it to the Apple tab so for enterprise the the and estimate that we do need approximately 18,000 cores CPU cores all together and that's a big number but that's doesn't even cover all the non-trivial engineering work that would need to be required that I kind of referenced earlier things like starting the data among multiple clusters migrating the data from one culture to another the daisy chain type stuff so that's that's the data point now for eon is to run the entire workload estimate we need about twenty thousand four hundred and eighty CPU cores so more CPU cores uh then then enterprise however about half of those and partly ten thousand of both CPU cores would only run for about six hours per day and so with the on demand and elasticity of the cloud that that is a huge advantage and so we are definitely moving as fast as we can to being on all Aeon we have we have time left on our contract with the enterprise clusters or not we're not able to get rid of them quite yet but Eon is certainly the way of the future for us I also want to point out that uh I mean yawn is we found to be the most efficient MPP database on the market and what that refers to is for a given dollar of spend of cost we get the most from that zone we get the most out of Vertica for that dollar compared to other cloud and MPP database platforms so our business is really happy with what we've been able to deliver with Yan Yan has also given us the ability to begin a new use case which is probably this case is probably pretty familiar to folks on the call where it's UI based so we'll have a website that our customers can log into and on that website they'll be able to run reports on queries through the website and have that run directly on a separate row to get beyond cluster and so much more latent latency sensitive and concurrency sensitive so the workflow that I've described up until this point has been pretty steady throughout the day and then we get our spike and then and then it goes back to normal for the rest of the day this workload it will be potentially more variable we don't know exactly when our engineers are going to deliver some huge feature that is going to make a 1-1 make a lot of people want to log into the website and check how their campaigns are doing so we but Yohn really helps us with this because we can add a capacity so easily we cannot compute and we can add so we can scale that up and down as needed and it allows us to match the concurrency so beyond the concurrency is much more variable we don't need a big long lead time so we're really excited about about this so last slide here I just want to leave you with some things to think about if you're about to embark or getting started on your journey with vertically on one of the things that you'll have to think about is the no account in the shard count so they're kind of tightly coupled the node count we determined by figuring like spinning up some instances in a single sub cluster and getting performance smaller to finding an acceptable performance considering current workload future workload for the queries that we had when we started and so we went with 64 we wanted to you want to certainly want to increase over 50 but we didn't want to have them be too big because of course it costs money and so what you like to do things in power to so 64 nodes and then the shard count for the shards again is like the data segmentation is a new type of segmentation on the data and the start out we went with 128 it began the reason is so that we could have no skew but you know could process the same same amount of data and we wanted to future-proof it so that's probably it's probably a nice general recommendation doubleness account for the nodes the instance type and and how much people space those are certainly things you're going to consider like I was talking about we went for they I three for Excel I 3/8 Excel because they offer good good Depot stores which gives us a really consistent good performance and it is all in Depot the pretty good mud presentation and some information on on I think we're going to use our r5 or the are for instance types for for our UI cluster so much less the data smaller so much less enter this on Depot so we don't need on that nvm you stores the reader we're going to want to have a reserved a mix of reserved and on-demand instances if you're if you're 24/7 shop like we are like so our ETL subclusters those are reserved instances because we know we're going to run those 24 hours a day 365 days a year so there's no advantage of having them be on-demand on demand cost more than reserve so we get cost savings on on figuring out what we're going to run and have keep running and it's the read subclusters that are for the most part on on demand we have one of our each sub Buster's is actually on 24/7 because we keep it up for ad-hoc queries your analyst queries that we don't know when exactly they're going to hit and they want to be able to continue working whenever they want to in terms of the initial data load the initial data ingest what we had to do and now how it works till today is you've got to basically load all your data from scratch there isn't a great tooling just yet for data populate or moving from enterprise to Aeon so what we did is we exported all the data in our enterprise cluster into park' files and put those out on s3 and then we ingested them into into our first Eon cluster so it's kind of a pain we script it out a bunch of stuff obviously but they worked and the good news is that once you do that like the second yon cluster is just a bucket copy in it and so there's tools missions that can help help with that you're going to want to manage your fetches and addiction so this is the data that's in the cache is what I'm referring to here the data that's in the default and so like I talked about we have our ETL cluster which has the most recent data that's just an injected and the most difficult data that's been aggregated so this really recent data so we wouldn't want anybody logging into that ETL cluster and running queries on big aggregates to go back one three years because that would invalidate the cache the depot would start pulling in that historical data and it was our assessing that historical data and evicting the recent data which would slow things out flow down that ETL pipelines so we didn't want that so we need to make sure that users whether their service accounts or human users are connecting to the right phone cluster and I mean we just created the adventure users with IPS and target groups to palm those pretty-pretty it was definitely something to think about lastly if you're like us and you're going to want to stop and start nodes you're going to have to have a service that does that for you we're where we built this very simple tool that basically monitors the queue and stops and starts subclusters accordingly we're hoping that that we can work with Vertica to have it be a little bit more driven by the cloud configuration itself so for us all amazon and we love it if we could have it have a scale with the with the with the eight of us can take through points do things to watch out for when when you're working with Eon is the first is system table queries on storage layer or metadata and the thing to be careful of is that the storage layer metadata is replicated it's caught as a copy for each of the sub clusters that are out there so we have the ETL sub cluster and our resources so for each of the five sub clusters there is a copy of all the data in storage containers system table all the data and partitions system table so when you want to use this new system tables for analyzing how much data you have or any other analysis make sure that you filter your query with a node name and so for us the node name is less than or equal to 64 because each of our sub clusters at 64 so we limit we limit the nodes to the to the 64 et 64 node ETL collector otherwise if we didn't have this filter we would get 5x the values for counts and some sort of stuff and lastly there is a problem that we're kind of working on and thinking about is a DC table data for sub clusters that are our stops when when the instances stopped literally the operating system is down and there's no way to access it so it takes the DC table DC table data with it and so I cannot after after my so close to scale up in the morning and then they scale down I can't run DC table queries on how what performed well and where and that sort of stuff because it's local to those nodes so we're working on something so something to be aware of and we're working on a solution or an implementation to try to suck that data out of all the notes you can those read only knows that stop and start all the time and bring it in to some other kind of repository perhaps another vertical cluster so that we can run analysis and monitoring even you want those those are down that's it um thanks for taking the time to look into my presentation really do it thank you Ron that was a tremendous amount of information thank you for sharing that with everyone um we have some questions come in that I would like to present to you Ron if you have a couple min it your first let's jump right in the first one a loading 85 terabytes per day of data is pretty significant amount what format does that data come in and what does that load process look like yeah a great question so the format is a tab separated files that are Jesus compressed and the reason for that could basically historical we don't have much tabs in our data and this is how how the data gets compressed and moved off of our our bidders the things that generate most of this data so it's a PSD gzip compressed and how you kind of we kind of have how we load it I would say we have actually kind of a Cadillac loader in a couple of different perspectives one is um we've got this autist raishin layer that's homegrown managing the logs is the data that gets loaded into Vertica and so we accumulate data and then we take we take some some files and we push them to redistribute them along the ETL nodes in the cluster and so we're literally pushing the file to through the nodes and we then run a copy statement to to ingest data in the database and then we remove the file from from the nodes themselves and so it's a little bit extra data movement which you may think about changing in the future assisting we move more and more to be on well the really nice thing about this especially for for the enterprise clusters is that the copy' statements are really fast and so we the coffee statements use memory but let's pick any other query but the performance of the cautery statement is really sensitive to the amount of available memory and so since the data is local to the nodes literally in the data directory that I referenced earlier it can access that data from the nvme stores and the kabhi statement runs very fast and then that memory is available to do something else and so we pay a little bit of cost in terms of latency and in terms of downloading the data to the nose we might as we move more and more PC on we might start ingesting it directly from s3 not copying the nodes first we'll see about that what's there that's how that's how we read the data interesting works great thanks Ron um another question what was the biggest challenge you found when migrating from on-prem to AWS uh yeah so um a couple of things that come to mind the first was the baculum the data load it was kind of a pain I mean like I referenced in that last slide only because I mean we didn't have tools built to do this so I mean we had to script some stuff out and it wasn't overly complex but yes it's just a lot of data to move I mean even with starting with with two petabytes so making sure that there there is no missed data no gaps making and moving it from the enterprise cluster so what we did is we exported it to the local disk on the enterprise buses and we then we push this history and then we ingested it in ze on again Allspark X oh so it's a lot of days to move around and I mean we have to you have to take an outage at some point stop loading data while we do that final kiss-up phase and so that was that was a challenge a sort of a one-time challenge the other saying that I mean we've been dealing with a week not that we're dealing with but with his challenge was is I mean it's relatively you can still throw totally new product for vertical and so we are big advantages of beyond is allow us to stop and start nodes and recently Vertica has gotten quite good at stopping in part starting nodes for a while there it was it was it took a really long time to start to Noah back up and it could be invasive but we worked with with the engineering team with Yan Zi and others to really really reduce that and now it's not really an issue that we think that we think too much about hey thanks towards the end of the presentation you had said that you've got 128 shards but you have your some clusters are usually around 64 nodes and you had talked about a ratio of two to one why is that and if you were to do it again would you use 128 shards ah good question so that is a reference the reason why is because we wanted to future professionals so basically we wanted to make sure that the number of stars was evenly divisible by the number of nodes and you could I could have done that was 64 I could have done that with 128 or any other multiple entities for but we went with 128 is to try to protect ourselves in the future so that if we wanted to double the number of nodes in the ECL phone cluster specifically we could have done that so that was double from 64 to 128 and then each node would have happened just one chart that it had would have to deal with so so no skew um the second part of question if I had to do it if I had to do it over again I think I would have done I think I would have stuck with 128 we still have I mean so we either running this cluster for more than 18 months now I think especially in USC and we haven't needed to increase the number of nodes so in that sense like it's been a little bit extra overhead having more shards but it gives us the peace of mind that we can easily double that and not have to worry about it so I think I think everyone is a nice place to start and you may even consider a three to one or four to one if if you're if you're expecting really rapid growth that you were just getting started with you on and your business and your gates that's a small now but what you expect to have them grow up significantly less powerful green thank you Ron that's with all the questions that we have out there for today if you do have others please feel free to send them in and we will get back to you and we'll respond directly via email and again our engineers will be available on the vertical forums where you can continue the discussion with them there I want to thank Ron for the great presentation and also the audience for your participation in questions please note that a replay of today's event and a copy of the slides will be available on demand shortly and of course we invite you to share this information with your colleagues as well again thank you and this concludes this webinar and have a great day you

Published Date : Mar 30 2020

SUMMARY :

stats on on the raw data sizes that we is so that we could have no skew but you

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Ron CormierPERSON

0.99+

sevenQUANTITY

0.99+

RonPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

VerticaORGANIZATION

0.99+

8 petabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

122 gigsQUANTITY

0.99+

85 terabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

ExcelTITLE

0.99+

512 gigabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

128 gigabyteQUANTITY

0.99+

three nodesQUANTITY

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

six nodesQUANTITY

0.99+

each clusterQUANTITY

0.99+

two petabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

240QUANTITY

0.99+

2 petabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

16 coresQUANTITY

0.99+

espn.comOTHER

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Yan YanORGANIZATION

0.99+

more than 18 monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

each clusterQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

one clusterQUANTITY

0.99+

eachQUANTITY

0.99+

amazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

32 coresQUANTITY

0.99+

ten thousandQUANTITY

0.98+

each sub clusterQUANTITY

0.98+

one clusterQUANTITY

0.98+

72QUANTITY

0.98+

seven terabytesQUANTITY

0.98+

two dimensionsQUANTITY

0.98+

TwoQUANTITY

0.98+

5xQUANTITY

0.98+

first oneQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

eonORGANIZATION

0.98+

128QUANTITY

0.98+

50QUANTITY

0.98+

four gigsQUANTITY

0.98+

s3TITLE

0.98+

three and a half terabytesQUANTITY

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.98+

64QUANTITY

0.98+

8xQUANTITY

0.97+

one chartQUANTITY

0.97+

about ten new terabytesQUANTITY

0.97+

one-timeQUANTITY

0.97+

two instancesQUANTITY

0.97+

DepotORGANIZATION

0.97+

last monthDATE

0.97+

five sub-clustersQUANTITY

0.97+

two clustersQUANTITY

0.97+

each nodeQUANTITY

0.97+

five sub clustersQUANTITY

0.96+

Breaking Analysis: Cyber Security Update: What to Expect at RSA 2020


 

>> From the SiliconANGLE Media office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's the cube. Now, here's your host, Dave Vellante. >> Hello everyone and welcome to this week's Wikibon cube insights powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis ahead of the RSA conference, we want to update you on the cyber security sector. This year's event is underlined by coronavirus fears, IBM has pulled out of the event and cited the epidemic as the reason and it's also brings to the front the sale of RSA by Dell to STG partners and private equity firm. Now in our last security drill down, we cited several mega trends in the security sector. These included the ever escalating sophistication of the attacker, the increased risk from the data economy, the expanded attack surface with the huge number of IP addresses that are that are exploding out there, and the lack of skills and the number of cyber tools that are coming to the market. Now, as you know, in these segments, we'd like to share insights from the cube. And I want you to listen to two American statesman and what they said, on The Cube. Here's general Keith Alexander, who's the former director of the NSA, along with Dr. Robert Gates, who's the former director of the CIA and former Secretary of Defense, play the clip. >> When you think about threats, you think about nation states, so you can go to Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, and then you think about criminal threats, and all the things like ransomware. Some of the nation state actors are also criminals at night, so they can use nation state tools and my concern about all the evolution of cyber threats is that the attacks are getting more destructive. >> I think cyber and the risks associated with cyber, and IT need to be a regular part of every board's agenda. >> So you hear General Alexander really underscore the danger, as well, Dr. Gates is articulating what we've said many times on the cube that cyber security is a board level agenda item. Now, the comments from both of these individuals represent what I would consider tailwinds for cyber technology companies. Now we're going to drill into some of those today. But it's not all frictionless. There are headwinds to in this market space, cloud migration, the shift from north south south to East West network traffic, its pressure traditional appliance based perimeter security solutions, increase complexity and lack of skills and other macro factors, including questions on ROI. CFO saying, hey, we spend all this cash, why aren't we more secure? Now, I want you to hear from two chief information security officers officers on both the challenges that they face and how they're dealing with them. Roll the clip. >> Lack of talent, I mean, we're starving for talent. Cybersecurity is the only field in the world with negative unemployment. We just don't have the actual bodies to actually fill the gaps that we have and in that lack of talent Cecil's are starving. >> I think that the public cloud offers us a really interesting opportunity to reinvent security right. So if you think about all of the technologies and processes and many of which are manual over the years, I think we have an opportunity to leverage automation to make our work easier in some ways. >> Now I featured Brian Lozada and Katie Jenkins before and breaking analysis segments, and you can hear it from the cyber leaders, we lack the talent, and cloud computing and automation are areas we're pursuing. So this challenges security companies to respond. But at the end of the day, companies have no no choice. In other words, organizations buying security solutions, the sophistication of the attacker is very high and the answer to my CFO and ROI is fear based. If you don't do this, you might lose billions in market cap. Now, I want you to take a listen to these cubilam talking about the attacker of sophistication and the importance of communication skills in order to fund cyber initiatives, really to keep up with the bad guys, please play the clip. >> The adversary is talented and they're patient, they're well funded okay, that's that's where it starts. And so, you know why why bring an interpreter to a host when there's already one there right? Why write all this complicated software distribution when I can just use yours. And so that's that's where the play the game starts. And and the most advanced threats aren't leaving footprints because the footprints already there, you know, they'll get on a machine and behaviorally they'll check the cash to see what's hot. And what's hot in the cash means that behaviorally, it's a fast they can go they're not cutting a new trail most of the time, right? So living off the land is not only the tools that they're using the automation, your automation they're using against you, but it's also behavioral. >> That's why the most the most important talent or skill that a security professional needs is communication skills. If you can't articulate technical risk into a business risk to fund your program, it's, you know, it's very hard for you to actually be successful in security. >> Now, the really insidious thing about what TK Keanini just said is the attackers are living off the land, meaning they're using your tools and your behaviors to sneak around your data unnoticed. And so as Brian Lozada said, as a security Pro, you need to be a great communicator in order to get the funding that you need to compete with the bad guys. Which brings me to the RSA conference. This is why you as a security practitioner attend, you want to learn more, you want to obtain new skills, you want to bring back ideas to the organization. Now one of the things I did to prepare for this segment is to read the RSA conference content agenda, which was co authored by Britta Glade and I read numerous blogs and articles about what to expect at the event and from all that I put together this word cloud, which conveys some of the key themes that I would expect you're going to hear at the shows. Look at skills jump right out, just like Brian was saying, the human element is going to be a big deal this year. IoT and the IT OT schism, everyone's talking about the Olympics, and seeing that as a watershed event for cyber, how to apply machine learning and AI is a big theme, as is cloud with containers and server less. phishing, zero trust and frameworks, framework for privacy, frameworks for governance and compliance, the 2020 election and weaponizing social media with deep fakes, and expect to hear a lot about the challenges of securing 5G networks, open source risks, supply chain risks, and of course, the need for automation. And it's no surprise there's going to be a lot of talk about cyber technology, the products and of course, the companies that sell them. So let's get into the market and unpack some of the ETR spending data and drill into some of these companies. The first chart I want to show you is spending on cyber relative to other initiatives. What this chart shows is the spending on cyber security highlighted in the green in relation to other sectors in the ETR taxonomy. Notice the blue dot. It shows the change in spending expected in 2020 versus 2019. Now, two points here. First, is that despite the top of my narrative that we always hear, the reality is that other initiatives compete for budget and you just can't keep throwing cash at the security problem. As I've said before, we spend like .014% percent of our global GDP on cyber, so we barely scratched the surface. The second point is there's there's there's a solid year on year growth quite high at 12% for a sector that's estimated at 100 to 150 billion dollars worldwide, according to many sources. Now let's take a look at some of the players in this space, who are going to be presenting at the RSA conference. You might remember to my 2020 predictions in that breaking analysis I focused on two ETR metrics, Net Score, which is a measure of spending velocity and Market Share, which measures pervasiveness in the data set. And I anointed nine security players as four star players. These were Microsoft, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk, Proofpoint, Fortinet, Oka, Cyber Ark and CrowdStrike. What we're showing here is an update of that data with the January survey data. My four star companies were defined as those in the cyber security sector that demonstrate in both net scores or spending momentum, that's the left hand chart and market share or pervasiveness on the right hand chart. Within the top 22 companies, why did I pick 22? Well, seemed like a solid number and it fit nicely in the screen and allowed more folks. So a few takeaways here. One is that there are a lot of cyber security companies in the green from the standpoint of net score. Number two is that Fortinet and Cisco fell off the four star list because of their net scores. While still holding reasonably well, they dropped somewhat. Also, some other companies like Verona's and Vera code and Carbon Black jumped up on the net score rankings, but Cisco and Fortinet are still showing some strength in the market overall, I'ma talk about that. Cisco security businesses up 9% in the quarter, and Fortinet is breaking away from Palo Alto Networks from a valuation perspective, which I'm going to drill into a bit. So we're going to give Cisco and Fortinet two stars this survey period. But look at Zscaler. They made the cut this time their net score or spending momentum jumped from 38% last quarter to nearly 45% in the January survey, with a sizable shared in at 123. So we've added Zscaler to the four star list, they have momentum, and we're going to continue to watch that quarterly horse race. Now, I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that Microsoft continues to get stronger and stronger in many sectors including cyber. So that's something to really pay attention to. Okay, I want to talk about the valuations a bit. Valuations of cyber security space are really interesting and for reasons we've discussed before the market's hot right now, some people think it's overvalued, but I think the space is going to continue to perform quite well, relative to other areas and tech. Why do I say that? Because cyber continues to be a big priority for organizations, the software and annual recurring revenue contribution ARR continues to grow, M&A is going to continue to be robust in my view, which is going to fuel valuations. So Let's look at some of the public companies within cyber. What I've compiled in this chart is eight public companies that were cited as four star or two star firms, as I defined earlier, now ranked this by market value. In the columns, we show the market cap and trailing 12 month revenue in billions, the revenue multiple and the annual revenue growth. And I've highlighted Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet because I want to drill into those two firms, as there's a valuation divergence going on between those two names, and I'll come back to that in just a minute. But first, I want to make a few points about this data. Number one is there's definitely a proportional relationship between the growth rate and the revenue multiple or premium being paid for these companies. Generally growth ranges between one and a half to three times the revenue multiple being paid. CrowdStrike for example has a 39 x revenue multiple and is growing at 110%, so they're at the high end of that range with a growth at 2.8 times their revenue multiple today. Second, and related, as you can see a wide range of revenue multiples based on these growth rates with CrowdStrike, Okta and now Zscaler as the standouts in this regard. And I have to call at Splunk as well. They're both large, and they have high growth, although they are moving beyond, you know, security, they're going into adjacencies and big data analytics, but you you have to love the performance of Splunk. The third point is this is a lucrative market. You have several companies with valuations in the double digit billions, and many with multi billion dollar market values. Cyber chaos means cash for many of these companies, and, of course for their investors. Now, Palo Alto throw some of these ratios out of whack, ie, why the lower revenue multiple with that type of growth, and it's because they've had some execution issues lately. And this annual growth rate is really not the best reflection of the stock price today. That's really being driven by quarterly growth rates and less robust management guidance. So why don't we look into that a bit. What this chart shows is the one year relative stock prices of Palo Alto Networks in the blue and compared to Fortinet in the red. Look at the divergence in the two stocks, look at they traded in a range and then you saw the split when Palo Alto missed its quarter last year. So let me share what I think is happening. First, Palo Alto has been a very solid performance since an IPO in 2012. It's delivered more than four Rex returns to shareholders over that period. Now, what they're trying to do is cloud proof their business. They're trying to transition more to an AR model, and rely less on appliance centric firewalls, and firewalls are core part of the business and that has underperformed expectations lately. And you just take Legacy Tech and Cloud Wash and Cloud native competitors like Zscaler are taking advantage of this and setting the narrative there. Now Palo Alto Network has also had some very tough compares in 2019 relative to 2018, that should somewhat abate this year. Also, Palo Alto has said some execution issues during this transition, especially related to sales and sales incentives and aligning that with this new world of cloud. And finally, Palo Alto was in the process of digesting some acquisitions like Twistlock, PureSec and some others over the past year, and that could be a distraction. Fortinet on the other hand, is benefiting from a large portfolio refresh is capitalizing on the momentum that that's bringing, in fact, all the companies I listed you know, they may be undervalued despite, of all the company sorry that I listed Fortinet may be undervalued despite the drop off from the four star list that I mentioned earlier. Fortinet is one of those companies with a large solution set that can cover a lot of market space. And where Fortinet faces similar headwinds as Palo Alto, it seems to be executing better on the cloud transition. Now the last thing I want to share on this topic is some data from the ETR regression testing. What ETR does is their data scientists run regression models and fit a linear equation to determine whether Wall Street earnings consensus estimates are consistent with the ETR spending data, they started trying to line those up and see what the divergence is. What this chart shows is the results of that regression analysis for both Fortinet and Palo Alto. And you can see the ETR spending data suggests that both companies could outperform somewhat expectations. Now, I wouldn't run and buy the stock based on this data as there's a lot more to the story, but let's watch the earnings and see how this plays out. All right, I want to make a few comments about the sale of the RSA asset. EMC bought RSA for around the same number, roughly $2 billion that SDG is paying Dell. So I'm obviously not impressed with the return that RSA has delivered since 2006. The interesting takeaway is that Dell is choosing liquidity over the RSA cyber security asset. So it says to me that their ability to pay down debt is much more important to Dell and their go forward plan. Remember, for every $5 billion that Dell pays down in gross debt, it dropped 25 cents to EPS. This is important for Dell to get back to investment grade debt, which will further lower its cost. It's a lever that Dell can turn. Now and also in thinking about this, it's interesting that VMware, which the member is acquiring security assets like crazy and most recently purchased carbon black, and they're building out a Security Division, they obviously didn't paw on the table fighting to roll RSA into that division. You know maybe they did in the financial value of the cash to Dell was greater than the value of the RSA customers, the RSA product portfolio and of course, the RSA conference. But my guess is Gelsinger and VMware didn't want the legacy tech. Gelsinger said many times that security is broken, it's his mission to fix it or die trying. So I would bet that he and VMware didn't see RSA as a path to fixing security, it's more likely that they saw it as a non strategic shrinking asset that they didn't want any part of. Now for the record, and I'm even won't bother showing you the the data but RSA and the ETR data set is an unimpressive player in cyber security, their market share or pervasiveness is middle of the pack, so it's okay but their net score spending velocities in the red, and it's in the bottom 20th percentile of the data set. But it is a known brand, certainly within cyber. It's got a great conference and it's been it's probably better that a PE company owns them than being a misfit toy inside of Dell. All right, it's time to summarize, as we've been stressing in our breaking analysis segments and on the cube, the adversaries are very capable. And we should expect continued escalation. Venture capital is going to keep pouring into startups and that's going to lead to more fragmentation. But the market is going to remain right for M&A With valuations on the rise. The battle continues for best of breed tools from upstarts like CrowdStrike and Okta and Zscaler versus sweets from big players like Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet. Growth is going to continue to drive valuations. And so let's keep our eyes on the cloud, remains disruptive and for some provides momentum for others provides friction. Security practitioners will continue to be well paid because there's a skill shortage and that's not going away despite the push toward automation. Got in talk about machine intelligence but AI and ML those tools, there are two edged sword as bad actors are leveraging installed infrastructure, both tools and behaviors to so called live off the land, upping the stakes in the arms race. Okay, this is Dave Vellante for Wikibon's CUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching this breaking analysis. Remember, these episodes are all available as podcasted Spotfire or wherever you listen. Connect with me at david.vellante at siliconangle.com, or comment on my LinkedIn. I'm @dvellante on Twitter. Thanks for watching everybody. We'll see you next time. (upbeat music).

Published Date : Feb 24 2020

SUMMARY :

Massachusetts, it's the cube. and the lack of skills and the number of cyber tools and all the things like ransomware. and IT need to be a regular part Now, the comments from both of these individuals represent We just don't have the actual bodies to actually fill and many of which are manual over the years, and the answer to my CFO and ROI is fear based. And and the most advanced threats to actually be successful in security. highlighted in the green in relation to other sectors

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Keith AlexanderPERSON

0.99+

FortinetORGANIZATION

0.99+

Brian LozadaPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

EMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

Legacy TechORGANIZATION

0.99+

CIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

OkaORGANIZATION

0.99+

NSAORGANIZATION

0.99+

BrianPERSON

0.99+

2012DATE

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

Palo AltoORGANIZATION

0.99+

JanuaryDATE

0.99+

SplunkORGANIZATION

0.99+

12 monthQUANTITY

0.99+

GelsingerPERSON

0.99+

Katie JenkinsPERSON

0.99+

ProofpointORGANIZATION

0.99+

GatesPERSON

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

two firmsQUANTITY

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

25 centsQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo Alto NetworksORGANIZATION

0.99+

OlympicsEVENT

0.99+

Britta GladePERSON

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

2.8 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

two stocksQUANTITY

0.99+

CrowdStrikeORGANIZATION

0.99+

Cyber ArkORGANIZATION

0.99+

38%QUANTITY

0.99+

12%QUANTITY

0.99+

SDGORGANIZATION

0.99+

two namesQUANTITY

0.99+

SecondQUANTITY

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Robert GatesPERSON

0.99+

two starQUANTITY

0.99+

second pointQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

M&AORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

110%QUANTITY

0.99+

siliconangle.comOTHER

0.99+

three timesQUANTITY

0.99+

OktaORGANIZATION

0.99+

2006DATE

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

two pointsQUANTITY

0.99+

ZscalerORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

Cloud WashORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jonathan Rende, PagerDuty | PagerDuty Summit 2019


 

>>from San Francisco. It's the Q covering pager duty. Summit 2019. Brought to you by pager Duty. >>Hey, welcome back. You're ready, Jeff? Rick here with the Cube. We're downtown San Francisco at the historic Western St Francis. A pager. Duty summit. It's the fourth year pager duty Summit, 30 year for the Q. Being here, I think they've about outgrown the venue. So he looked forward to seeing where we go next year. But we're excited to have somebody is at a very busy day. A lot of product announcements leading a lot of this effort. He's Jonathan. Randy, this s V P. Of product for pager duty. Jonathan, great to see you. Thanks for having me. So, congratulations. A lot of Ah lot of product announcements today. >>This is our biggest unveiling of the year. >>What s so I don't want you to pick your favorite baby, but what are some of the highlights? That goddess here today? >>Yes, a couple of big things today and tomorrow, not just today. >>Uh, >>first, we're really focused on applying. It is the buzzword of the sense of the new Millennium machine learning, but we're applying it across our entire portfolio, and we're doing it in a good way, not in a creepy way. We're doing in a good way to help organizations make sense of all the data they're getting. Tell him what's happening and, more importantly, what they could do to get better. And so that's something that we call our intelligence Dashboards is part of our analytics products. That's one big one, right? Right. And as you probably know, being here, pager duty is all about helping teams to be more effective in the moments that matter. And one of the other big announcements we have is intelligent triage. And so what is it way See with There's a lot of great companies here, partners that we're working with and whenever they're working, major issues within their companies were seconds, matter or even microseconds. They could lose millions of dollars that work in real time. They'll find out that there's multiple teams working on the same problems on Lee for one team to find out that somebody's undoing some of things that they're doing. So we focused in a huge way on building context, the visibility so that the teams in see what other issues air related That's what we call intelligent triage. So nobody needs to do double work, >>right? It's funny on the on the A I right in machine learning because they are the hot, hot, hot buzzword. But what I don't think are the hot buzzards, which is where all the excitement is happening, is it's the applied A I it's not Aye aye, for a eyes sake. Or were great. Aye aye company with an aye aye widget that we want to sell you. It's really leveraging a I within your core application space, your core domain expertise to make your abs do better things. And that's really what you guys have embraced. >>Absolutely. It's way have to be so empathetic to our users. Are users carry an unbelievable burden. They are on the front lines when things go down. They have, you know, minutes, seconds to make right decisions, and there's a lot of responsibility with that. So we're using a I in applied way to help them make sense of being overloaded with information, focus them in on the things that can make the biggest positive impact right, So it is applied a I in its purest form and >>the other part I found interesting is really anak knowledge mint that it's not just the people that have to fix the problem that needs to know about the problem, but there's a much larger kind of ecosystem that ecosystem around. That problem, whether it's sales reps executive for certain, is a whole bunch of people that should know, need to know, have value, to know beyond just the really smart person that I've now put on fixing the >>problem. You're bringing up a great point, which is a lot of people know page of duty because of how we help technical teams, developers and office people fix these incidents. When they happen right when a site goes down or when something search isn't working correctly but getting work done. We're taking that in its broadest context. It's beyond technical responders. First we have to service them. They're our core audience. They're why we're here today. But that unit of work getting work done goes beyond them as you're saying. It goes to what we call business responders who I could be working in a customer service team and while that incident is happening, I need that information so that I can ready my communication in case somebody calls up the sports desk and opens up a ticket. I need to know what to tell him right when it's gonna be fixed and how we're addressing their problems. Or I could be the CFO, a stakeholder and just want to know what's the real revenue impact of this outage of this time? So whether I'm taking action or I just need to know these air people outside of the sphere of the technical team and their business responders and stakeholders and we're automating the flow of information all of them so that they don't interrupt the poor responders team so they can focus on their work, >>right? Yeah. Another concept that kind of clarified today is all of your guys partnerships. You know, you've listened on your integration page on the Web site. It's clear. Well, data dog sales for Zenda Sumo AWS service now last CNN, IBM Blue mix. I mean, it's they can't go through the whole list. It's a huge list, but I think confusion in the market or maybe clarification is helpful is, you know, kind of where to those systems play versus your system when that Everyone wants to be a system of record, right? Everybody wants to be the database that has all the all the information. And yet you figured out a way to take your capabilities and augment all these other platforms and really puts you in a nice play across a really wide range of a problem. Sets. >>Yeah, it's it's so core to who we are way like to think of our pager duty platform. I always refer to it as it's a central nervous system, and what does that really mean? We always say it's a central nervous system and pager duty is about people. So all of those vendors, all of those companies, they're all valued partners. Many of them are customers of pager duty as well. They use us to keep their service is up on the monitoring world. But what pager duty is always focused on is ensuring that people two people collaboration to get real work done based on the information coming from those folks. So a lot of those vendors out there they play such an invaluable part of the ecosystem. They let us know they provide all the telemetry in the information in the data way, make sense of it and then engage people Finish that work. So in a way, you know that central nervous system is taking all these impulses just like a really central nervous system. And we're engaging the right people to help them effectively get the right right, and we couldn't do it without them. So the famous 350 plus way couldn't do what we do without them, and they're all here today. You >>didn't think I was going to read the whole hunt 350 >>Hope. That would be a long way >>Hades in desk on. And I know that was part of the new customer service and has been getting, you know, kind of your value kind of closer to the actual customer transaction. It's always in support of the customer transactions. The website's down transaction close, but this actually has taken it to the next level toe. Have a direct contact to the person who's actually engaged with the client to give them or inside is what's going on as being resolved in these type thing with a two way communication pattern. >>Yeah, it's something I'm personally really excited about. Where customer of zendesk as well. So we use end us and they use pager duty. So we get a lot of feedback on what's working, what's not working, which informed us and what we were doing. But there's two big problems in the industry that I've seen over, you know, two plus decades, which is customer service and support teams. They're dealing also on the front lines. Having them communicate and get information from development teams isn't always easy. And so both of us are really interested in kind of breaking down the walls between those organizations. But doing so in a way that's not interrupting those teams when they're doing their work that they have, right, so one, that's what we wanted to accomplish. How can we share information seamlessly automatically? So both teams are in sync, but they're not pestering each other and then to that work that's being done on the development side, when something does go wrong in a devil apps world, now, the customer support agents, the service agents they can get ahead of those cases that are being opened up, so they're not in the dark. They're not being flooded by tons of cases being opened up and they don't know what to say. They ready their communications and push it out because they're insane. >>It's really you think pager duty and notifications were surrounded by all these dashboards and computer stuff, but you made a really instant comment. It's all about the people you guys commissioned. A study called I'm gonna read an unplanned work, the human impact of an always on world and really going after unplanned work. Now it's funny, because everyone always talks about unplanned maintenance and on scheduled maintenance and the impacts on aircraft and the impacts on power generation and aircraft. This is the first time I've ever heard anyone couch it as as unplanned, which is completely disruptive fours on people and their lives, not to mention their service workers. And, according to the study, 2/3 of her pissed off and not too happy the way things are going at work anyway, with what kind of was zenith of that. And that's a really great way to reframe this problem into something much more human. >>The genesis of this all came from the concept that a CZ you'll read a lot we say we're always on. Let's keep it that way. Let's help help everyone. Keep it that way. It's a mantra with pager duty, and it comes from again when I say Genesis, it comes from even within our platform way. Don't have me Windows. We are on 24 7 360 days a year way have to be up when other service's aren't because of that. Whenever we work with organizations or vendors that that we pay for. And they say we have a maintenance window like a maintenance window my partner in crime runs engineering team are meant for. He always says maintenance Windows air for cars, not SAS software like there are no maintenance windows. And what that means as a first step is, if that's the case, there's no maintenance windows you're always on. Then you have to answer this question of how much time are you really spending unplanned work interruptions, right? So we really started taking not the heart. We really started trying to figure out what is the percentage everybody's trying to innovate more. That's planned war, right? Is it? 10% is a 20%. Is it 50%? The best organizations we see our 20 to 25% is unplanned work. We'll >>need 25% for the best organization. >>Yeah, so means not. So best organizations are very different, right? And so way feel that we uniquely can help organizations get way better at cutting down that time so that they can innovate more, Right? They're not firefighting. They're actually innovating and growing their business right. That's a big part of how we help people in these organizations do their job better. >>God, that's before you get in contact. Switching and pressure and disruption and >>way found some amazing statistics in my prior life. Iran Engineering. And it was at a sauce company. And what I found was whenever customers, whenever my top engineers would be put on Call Way, didn't have pager duty at the time, and they would be on call and interrupted on consecutive nights in the middle of the night. First, I would typically hear about when somebody was burned out is when I would see a resignation letter on my desk or somebody way no, after two or three or four successive interruptions in someone's personal life that goes on where they feel they're not being productive. One, they aren't productive at work either, to they're a huge retention risk. So way have that kind of data. We can look at it, and we can help management and organizations help them. And their teams take better care of their teams so that, you know, they're they're being more humane, humane knots, not human off pain, All right. And how you deal with those most expensive precious resource is in your company, which are your people is really important >>when they walk out the door every night, you know? So you gotta take care of him. So they come back the next day. It is? Yes. All right, Jonathan, last question is you as we wait, we're not quite done with some yet, but as we come to the closest on her arm really busy year. The AIPO. You guys have done amazing things, but you kind of flipped the calendar. Look forward. What are some of your kind of priorities as we as >>we move forward? Yeah. So it's been a crazy year. A lot of change and a couple things going forward. One were big partners with Amazon in a W S S O were attending reinvent. That's a big event for the company, but also at this event. As I mentioned before, it's probably our biggest unveiling of new innovations and products for our entire 12,000 plus customers. So for us, it may seem like it's an end. It's really just the beginning, because all of these products and intelligent triage business response, intelligent dashboards, these products that are apart, his capabilities that are part of our analytics and events intelligence on the pager duty, platform way have to keep evolving This we have to keep kind of moving forward because the world is always on and we've got to keep it that way. >>What? Andre just had a great line in his keynote about being scared is the generator of wisdom. But here it is, right here. Fear is the beginning of wisdom. Not necessarily fear, but fear getting caught. Keep moving that we have ahead of the pack. All right, Jonathan, Thanks for taking a few minutes and congratulations. I'm sure tough getting all those new babies out this week, but what a great what a great job. Thank you so much. All right. Pleasure. He's Jonathan. I'm Jeff. You're watching the cube. Where? Pager duty Summit in San Francisco. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.

Published Date : Sep 25 2019

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by pager Duty. It's the fourth year pager duty Summit, 30 year for the Q. And one of the other big announcements we have is It's funny on the on the A I right in machine learning because they are the hot, hot, hot buzzword. They are on the front lines smart person that I've now put on fixing the of the technical team and their business responders and stakeholders and we're automating the And yet you figured out a way to take your capabilities and augment all the right right, and we couldn't do it without them. It's always in support of the customer transactions. now, the customer support agents, the service agents they can get ahead of those It's all about the people you guys commissioned. And they say we have a maintenance window like a maintenance window my partner in crime And so way feel that we uniquely can help organizations get way better at God, that's before you get in contact. And how you deal with those most expensive precious So you gotta take care of him. and events intelligence on the pager duty, platform way have to keep evolving This we have Fear is the beginning of wisdom.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JonathanPERSON

0.99+

Jonathan RendePERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

RickPERSON

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

CNNORGANIZATION

0.99+

20%QUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

25%QUANTITY

0.99+

RandyPERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

two peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

W S S OEVENT

0.99+

10%QUANTITY

0.99+

one teamQUANTITY

0.99+

first stepQUANTITY

0.99+

Iran EngineeringORGANIZATION

0.99+

both teamsQUANTITY

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

AndrePERSON

0.98+

threeQUANTITY

0.98+

two plus decadesQUANTITY

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.98+

zendeskORGANIZATION

0.98+

24QUANTITY

0.98+

next dayDATE

0.97+

firstQUANTITY

0.97+

this weekDATE

0.97+

12,000 plus customersQUANTITY

0.97+

Western St FrancisLOCATION

0.97+

Summit 2019EVENT

0.96+

PagerDutyEVENT

0.96+

2/3QUANTITY

0.95+

oneQUANTITY

0.95+

WindowsTITLE

0.94+

two big problemsQUANTITY

0.94+

LeePERSON

0.92+

two wayQUANTITY

0.92+

millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.91+

30 yearQUANTITY

0.9+

doubleQUANTITY

0.9+

twoQUANTITY

0.88+

fourQUANTITY

0.87+

coveringEVENT

0.86+

360 daysQUANTITY

0.86+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.84+

350 plusCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.8+

SASORGANIZATION

0.77+

pager duty SummitEVENT

0.73+

350OTHER

0.71+

Zenda SumoORGANIZATION

0.71+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.69+

pager dutyEVENT

0.68+

Blue mixCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.65+

a yearQUANTITY

0.65+

SummitEVENT

0.64+

7QUANTITY

0.62+

DutyEVENT

0.6+

fourth yearQUANTITY

0.6+

eachQUANTITY

0.59+

coupleQUANTITY

0.54+

GodPERSON

0.54+

duty SummitORGANIZATION

0.52+

nd computerQUANTITY

0.51+

GenesisORGANIZATION

0.5+

pagerEVENT

0.5+

2019DATE

0.5+

PagerDutyORGANIZATION

0.46+

PagerEVENT

0.44+

Sameera Mohammed Al Atawi, American University of Bahrain & Huda Ahmed Mohsen | AWSPS Summit Bahrain


 

>> From Bahrain, it's the Cube. Covering AWS Public Sector, Bahrain. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. >> Everyone welcome to the Cube here in Bahrain, for AWS in the Middle East, Manama Summit. I'm John for the Cube coverage. It's cloud computing, new Amazon region, a lot of innovation. But two great guests we have, Huda Ahmed Mohsen, who's the Chief of Information Technology and the Ministry of Information and Authority. Welcome to the Cube. And Sameera Mohammed Al Atawi. You are the Information and Communication Technology Director at the American University in Bahrain. Thank you for coming on. >> Thank you so much for having me here. >> Great to have you on. The ministries are mandated to move to the cloud, Huda, so we know what's coming for you, 2020. The goal is cloud first in Bahrain. We covered this last year. How's that going? On plan? >> It is on plan and is in the process. We start in November 2017. We start our journey with the clouds. We start moving our load smoothly. We're planners. Face a lot of challenge in the beginning, of course, as all of the ministries. Then with help the IGA with our governments, we move smoothly. I think now we reach a good position that we can reach our vision in Salah. >> Well, it's great that the government in Bahrain has a mandate for all the ministries to move to the cloud. I have to ask you, share with the folks watching, why the move to the cloud? What was the big reason why the cloud first was in place? >> See, technology's moving fast now, and the speed and security and the availability is very important to us as a ministry, especially for ministry information. That's why we decide, and as a government, vision, of course, we did decide to move to the cloud. >> A lot of integration from the old way to the new way. What are some of your observations between the two? >> Of course, a lot of changing, a lot of difference, because if you need to just establish any projects in an a normal way, how much time you will have spent, and how much resources you will have spent? And a cloud, you can just imagine. It is with a click. >> Sameera, you're in a new role. Talk about your new role where you were before. This is not new to you, the cloud. You've had your toe in the water before. You've been playing around with the cloud. Now with the American University in Bahrain, full steam ahead, a lot of pressure, lot of need, desire? >> I think, yes, it is not new for me. I'm in the IT field like know for ages. I wouldn't say the years. But then, yes, it's not new, but in Bahrain polytechnic we are having the same journey, like migrating to the cloud. It's a new challenge in the American University of Bahrain. It's a new startup, entrepreneur university. But then the interesting thing that I have joined them like three weeks ago and now the IT is up and running within two weeks. So with the help of the cloud and AWS, our servers now all up and running. By the way, this is our first day in school. So our students there just taking their formal classes as per today. So this is a very proud moment. >> And the servers are on the cloud, powering everything? >> Yes, we have more data on the cloud at the moment, and we have also 5365, and we have our ERPC Stem, as well. It's all in the cloud. So within two weeks, that's an amazing story to be told. >> Versus the old way was months, years? >> Well, actually, it's for every institution there are some challenges and there are some pros and cons, but I think the most beautiful thing about Bahrain polytechnic that everybody was working as a team and we understand each others issues. So regardless the time, there always been a support and faith and trust in IT just to deliver the organization mission and vision. This is the same with the American University of Bahrain. There is a huge trust and faith in IT that they will derive the trust formation, or the change to the future. Ironically, the future's here. >> Yeah, and the cloud region is beautiful out here. The impact academic is something that we're going to be watching closely, because the training is coming too. We're seeing that in the announcements here around a cloud computing degree, more skill development. But I have to ask you from a business standpoint in the academic area, what's the main use cases for cloud? Is it the curriculum? Is it the operations? What is some of the key cloud areas you're innovating on? >> Very interesting question. I think we have like a blend of use cases. We have the operational use cases, and we have the academic use cases as well. I mean, the most important for us is in the university is the academic. Now how we can empower our students to face the challenges of the future and the market demand. So we are sensing a lot of interest about the artificial intelligence, robotics, big data, and this morning when I was just scrolling down the menu of AWS, I've been seeing this a lot. So how we can imbed this technology or the reading material like an AWS educate in our courses and material, versus the operational use cases, how we can deliver the business objective in an entire mode and in a most efficient way. You know, like in university, we have so much critical time that we don't afford losing IT, like exams, posting grades, even for our students graduation projects. It's become easier and easier for the business, however with the aid of IT. >> And the agility is very important because the expectation from the students is high. >> It's way high. I mean, the expectation and the use is already there. So, not like before, not like my age, you know, like students, they get to introduce technology when they got to the university. Now all of our students, they already know and use the technology before they join. >> Huda, talk about the ministry, because you guys on the government side, very progressive, doing new things. You got Amazon's region here, which is going to create a revitalization. You're in the middle of it. What are some of your observations on the things that are going on that are new for you guys that are a positive? >> Seeing now a cloud maybe as a ministries and as a government project, the most new thing that we get that the new environment. This is totally new environment. You know if you just have any new thing or any new environment, you have resistance from everyone, because it's a new thing. >> People fear change. >> Yes. >> They don't want to change. >> Of course. Even sometimes the change is good, but this is the mentality of people to resist a change. As a government because we have one vision, which is all the ministries working within this vision. We really plan it well, I think. And we do it well. As you see now in Bahrain, the time that they establish the cloud until now, you can see how many projects in the process, how many project already done. >> You know, cultural change, we cover this. We go to hundreds of events. We cover all around the world, mostly in the United States, but culture's number one. People always want to push back against change. However, the benefits that you were pointing out, Sameera, are undeniable. Two weeks, talk about standing up critical infrastructure for whether it's curriculum or for services for citizens. It's hard to debate, to justify the old way. It's pretty hard. (chuckles) Maybe some political in there, but, I mean, ultimately, the proof is there. That has to be factored in. How do you guys do that? Do you just show people the data? Look what we did. Is that how you get things through? Is it more cultural? >> I think we just discuss in a panel about even let's talk about only the part of the financially thing. Before I was in IT, if you want to just make anything, and data sent out on any projects, how much time you will have spent to bring the devices, to bring the servers, to connect it, to do it. How much time you will have spent, even in the financially procedures, as a government, of course? Now it is, if you have any problem or any projects, you just by click finish it and done. >> I'm very impressed with Iran, second year the Cube's been here. The things we've talked about last year have been executed. They're executing. The region's up and running. The cryptocurreny is in place. We covered that just now. We're going to hear about some curriculum for degrees. But last year, you mentioned the panel. You guys were just on the AWS We Power Tech. Last year, Teresa Cross hosted a big breakfast, and I was lucky enough to attend that. I actually got kicked out of my seat, because with so many women that wanted to sit down, I happily gave up my seat for that. It was a packed house. Women in tech is very real and growing. You guys were just on a great panel talking about this. What was going on in the panel? What was the key topic? >> Well, actually, the key topic is celebrating women in IT. And I think women now they are flourishing in the IT field. We're showing lots of power and strength. Also I think women in nature, we are dealing with problem solving like in a natural way, as well as team buildings. So it comes with our genes. On top of that, the technical power and the technical thinking and the experience in the IT field, of course it adds a lot of confidence when we are presenting our plans. And we see that society is welcoming the woman workforce in IT field more and more every day. So I think this is something that we should celebrate and we should put a lot of highlight on it. Knowing that the value of woman is really growing. >> You were just talking about the time change, how things are faster. Things are getting done much faster, so things are accelerating, and combined with more job openings, more roles are opening. It's not just coding. It's creative, design thinking. So you're seeing a surface area of opportunities. Huda, you're seeing this as well in the government. This is a bigger field now. Your thoughts on how you see the panel. >> Yes, but maybe Sameera will have more experience in this area. >> On the skill gaps question that comes up a lot, there's so many job openings coming. There's a region here, there's entrepreneurs and startups. What are some of the new skills that folks are trying to learn? What do you guys think? >> Well, actually on that, coming from an educational field, we know that cloud computing is like number one set of skills that is on demand for the coming few years. But again, knowing that, it will be as essential as we should not think about it. It just will be transforming as a very catalyst. The way that we're thinking of electricity. At the beginning it was a big deal. Later on, it just there, and it has to be there for us to move as a society, for us to move as an economy. Then we're moving to the real things as, for example, blockchains and we're talking about artificial intelligence. And the technology itself is just not as important unless it has some feed in the economy development or in the society change. So I think this is how we can see that happening. >> So overall, you both think that cloud computing is going to revitalize the area? >> Definitely. >> Of course. >> Definitely, in a big way. I mean, the market, the first skill set is looked at in the IT field and is how many training, how many certificates have you taken in cloud computing? On top of that, robotics, big data, but the most important thing, how to make the technology benefit the citizens. In our case, the students, how we can deliver our classes in a better way. How we can transform the business of university from on campus to study from anywhere. Though we have a very amazing campus in American University of Bahrain. >> Looking forward to covering you guys. Final question for you guys. What's next? What do you guys have coming up in this next year? A lot of activities? What are the goals? What are some of the things you're trying to accomplish? >> Our next thing that we are planning to complete on this cloud project, to shift all our environment to the cloud to success in this, and to implement it in a good way that we can really use it in a good way, because you know, sometimes you will see the cloud and do lose it, but you cannot use it and really benefit way that you can get all the benefit from it. So it show our religion now and our next step to use it inventory. >> I think for us and the American University of Bahrain, we had yesterday an amazing meeting with Teresa, and having our CEO, Dr. Susan in the meeting as well. And I think there is a lot of great anticipation of what we can do together. So something that is put on the table that we want to sort of strengthen this relationship in terms of integrating our courses with AWS, as well as looking forward for new opportunities like training and certificate in the field and so forth. >> This is super exciting, benefits the citizens, students, new educational opportunities, new jobs, new services, whole new oasis. >> I think this is all, it's all about... >> The cloud oasis. This is the Cube coverage. We are here in Bahrain for AWS Summit here. I'm John Furrier, be back with more after this short break.

Published Date : Sep 15 2019

SUMMARY :

From Bahrain, it's the Cube. for AWS in the Middle East, Manama Summit. Great to have you on. Face a lot of challenge in the beginning, of course, has a mandate for all the ministries to move to the cloud. and security and the availability is very important to us A lot of integration from the old way to the new way. in an a normal way, how much time you will have spent, This is not new to you, the cloud. It's a new challenge in the American University of Bahrain. It's all in the cloud. This is the same with the American University of Bahrain. What is some of the key cloud areas you're innovating on? We have the operational use cases, and we have And the agility is very important because the expectation I mean, the expectation and the use is already there. Huda, talk about the ministry, because you guys a government project, the most new thing that we get the cloud until now, you can see how many projects However, the benefits that you were pointing out, even in the financially procedures, But last year, you mentioned the panel. in the IT field, of course it adds a lot of Your thoughts on how you see the panel. in this area. What are some of the new skills that folks of skills that is on demand for the coming few years. In our case, the students, how we can deliver our classes What are some of the things you're trying to accomplish? get all the benefit from it. So something that is put on the table that we want to benefits the citizens, students, new educational This is the Cube coverage.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
TeresaPERSON

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Teresa CrossPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

BahrainLOCATION

0.99+

SusanPERSON

0.99+

November 2017DATE

0.99+

Last yearDATE

0.99+

American University of BahrainORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Huda Ahmed MohsenPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

American UniversityORGANIZATION

0.99+

Sameera Mohammed Al AtawiPERSON

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

Middle EastLOCATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

SalahLOCATION

0.99+

first dayQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

HudaPERSON

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

three weeks agoDATE

0.99+

Two weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

two weeksQUANTITY

0.98+

SameeraORGANIZATION

0.98+

two great guestsQUANTITY

0.98+

IGAORGANIZATION

0.97+

second yearQUANTITY

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.96+

firstQUANTITY

0.96+

AWS SummitEVENT

0.96+

one visionQUANTITY

0.95+

hundreds of eventsQUANTITY

0.93+

SameeraPERSON

0.92+

AWS We Power TechORGANIZATION

0.92+

AWSPS SummitEVENT

0.92+

first skill setQUANTITY

0.92+

this morningDATE

0.83+

next yearDATE

0.81+

Ministry of Information and AuthorityORGANIZATION

0.79+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.75+

polytechnicORGANIZATION

0.75+

IranLOCATION

0.68+

Manama SummitEVENT

0.67+

CubeLOCATION

0.63+

oneQUANTITY

0.61+

ChiefPERSON

0.54+

StemORGANIZATION

0.32+

5365ORGANIZATION

0.28+

Varun Chhabra, Dell EMC & Muneyb Minhazuddin, VMware | VMworld 2019


 

>> live from San Francisco celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum World 2019 brought to you by IBM Wear and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back to San Francisco. We continue our coverage here. Live on the Cube. 10th year John of covering Veum World This is 29 teens version John for John Wall's Got to have inside the Moscone Center. We're joined now by Varun Chabrol It was the vice president of marketing at Delhi M. C. Good to see you today. >> Thanks for having me. >> How's your week been? So far? >> It's been amazing. How can you don't get excited? All the innovation we're seeing this week >> we'll hear about some big announcements. Do you guys have made? And Moon Young Man Azzedine, who is the vice president of product marketing that for cloud security and works based solutions at Veum wear when you're good to see you. >> Good to see you again. You, By >> the way, you might be the busiest guy here. Yesterday, when you came into the set, you were coming in. Just spoken to 1300 people in a standing room only session You coming out? 500 folks, How many sessions have you done? The seven. So >> you don't count the the one on one with the analyst. And, uh, you know, the customers and partners and press. And tomorrow actually host ah 140 press media analyst on campus in Palo Alto from Asia Pacific because they float all the way from Asia >> plus 140. Yeah, it's a piece of cake. >> Yeah, hose them from 10 to 4. So, I mean, >> you're always smiling >> knowing that this is a pretty wide audience to whom you've been speaking. But just generally, what are you if there's a common thread at all about the kinds of questions that people are coming to you with, or or the concerns or maybe just the things they want to talk about being inspired. But what they're hearing here at the show, >> Okay. Now, according to two aspects of it, one obviously from analysts themselves, you know, they are actually have been very complimentary about the way we've taken our approach. I'm not sure if you could have paid attention. In the last couple of years, we've been talking especially the cloud side, the narrative, to be very much about use cases, solving problems. You know the key? No, we talked about hate my grade modernize. It wasn't about Hey, I've got the next big product here with all these features and capabilities. You do this and that. So we're gonna shifted out narrative. And it was very, you know, the the analyst across the boat. You know, we've been seeing an appreciative of the fact that you actually changing a narrative to be re compelling and we're gonna reflected. And we have some things here like Cloud City, where it's not a standard demo boot. It's a it's ah, Customers walk in and they touch and feel and see which we did it, Adele technology will, too. It's like, What's your business? Probably going through these applications. I'm sitting. I don't know if I should be modernizing them or should be migrating into Amazon. A ridge or so. So you know that narrative the analysts are appreciative off, and that reflects into the customer conversations I've been having in the briefings, like one on one with customers. They're really kind of lost us. D'oh! Hey, I've I'm working in this environment. There's a lot of pressure for me. Thio modernize my applications or go adopt my cloud. First strategy is where do I start? Where do I go? It's like, you know, there's a big pressure, so they just want clarity. I think in the end, everything we're gonna we're doing in our study that comes out obviously the buzzword for this weird world. It stanza, right? And, you know, >> we've won the product announcements was >> actually Brandon can Oh, yeah. Branding announcement, to be honest is yeah, because we're trying to bring together, as you know, in Tansy has landed in Bill Run Manage billed as in you know how our intent to acquire Pivotal Already acquired Big Tommy. How all our different acquisitions with different brand names are coming together to establish our bills portfolio again. The sphere. Everybody knows the sphere Project Pacific P ks. All of those create a good run time, environment and manageability like Adi manage with assets from ve Franta gain morbid Nami and you know it. So this multiple brands that are coming into this package off Iran. So we had a creative tan Xue too, you know, put forward statement together that yes is going to be 78 different brands coming into this, but going forward to stand. >> So so that's a great strategy on De Liam Seaside on Del Technology. Michael Dell was in here and I asked him. I said he could have been number one in everything you could. Let's talk about I'm number one in servers again. You kind of get on HP, little baby. But those air peace parts now. So we've got the cloud game. It's bringing despair it at parts together kind and making it coherent from a positioning standpoint and understandable and deployable. So you guys are going down there. That's your cloud strategy. Take a minute to explain that. >> Yeah, absolutely, John. So So what? What we've been doing. We announced this at Del Technologies will this year. But, you know, in the cloud infrastructure space, we're working very closely with the anywhere too tightly integrate our hardware solutions with their their cloud software. And we think that by combining these two in a tightly integrated joined engineer, jointly engineered solutions coupled with the service, is that you know, both of'em were and l e m c bring the customers we think we have. We're giving customers are very consistent experience both with their own premises, infrastructure with public cloud as well as with the edge cloud. And that's really what we're trying to do. That's what we've been building upon and uniting the announcements this week. You know, just just hopefully show customers that the sky's the limit, whether it's not just your infrastructure management. Also app development. Managing your APS both traditional and and cloud native. It's all here for And >> what's the big takeaway free from your standpoint that you'd like people to know about what's going on? Adele the emcee for the VM. Where relation. What's the big top item? >> Yeah, there's there's there's just so much good Doctor Wait forever drank the town about. If someone rises >> way, only have two hours >> time work. The most important thing that people should should know about it, >> you know, both deli M. C and V. M. R. I think, are very, very customer driven companies that we respond to customer feedback and we try to respond to them very fast. That's been true to our respective lifetimes and what we've done in the so that I think there's two broad areas of collaboration. One is in the cloud space, which is all about, you know, making sure that the the innovation that GM is bringing the market, we're providing that in a toy tightly integrated infrastructure solution. Right. So we announced from a deli in seaside support for Vienna, where p ks being deployed automatically on Vieques trail using VCF return. Our customers can you know, a lot of teams were telling us we have our developers and turning developers banging slash knocking on the door, saying we need to build a cloud. Native applications. You need to give us an environment that we can use. And you know, if if all righty, if these IittIe teams don't turn around and give them something relatively quickly Well, guess what? The developers will go somewhere else, right? Yeah, exactly. So And if you look at the kubernetes environment today, if you really look look at what the work that's required to set up kubernetes and ready infrastructure. So a lot of scripting a lot of manual, you know, work command line interface is testing stuff. And what what? V m r p k s does. And you know what times you will do as well is really makes it easy when we've taken that with the magic of the American Foundation sitting on top of the exhale to make it super easy for our customers to be able to deploy kubernetes ready infrastructure and then have it be ready for scale, right? And then the important thing here also is this is the same infrastructure of the expelling bcf that our customers are using for traditional applications as well, right? Trying to reduce that complexity. Give them the one platform. So this cloud, you know, we had we were doing the same integration on just with R A C I platform, but also with our best to breach storage or we're not working with the C f. And then we're also making investments on data protection like it's so important to be able to manage your data in this multi cloud world. We have applications sitting everywhere, data. We all know that it is a crown jewel. So >> it's really a king validating from the Vienna a point of view. How that works right is is about applications is about the infrastructure, and it's about the operation and it really kind of together as we talk about Han Xue p. K s is giving our customers that Chuy's off. You pick Cuban eighties, you know, environments, application choice. >> Um, >> it took us. Actually, we didn't We didn't arrive it in that order. Wait. Did it. In the outer off Infrastructure Plot Foundation is a critical piece of the joint engineering. But being aware and the Della Bella Technologies is really from aviary perspective. It took Locke Foundation, and that's the stack that runs in every public cloud. So, you know AWS as your G C P 4000 plus, you know, cloud provider partners. But Flat Foundation is a platform that was validated on. They'll take hardware and you know, that's the package. But now, as you see, we're lighting that it's same infrastructure up for traditional and culminated applications. >> I think the app sides important to point out, because if you could ve m wears heritage, you look at Dale's heritage. You had abs that ran on PCs absent, ran on servers, client server. And if you look at the fertilization that wasn't under the covers, apt an innovation that didn't require code changes. So that's the DNA that you guys have. Now, when you think about like cloud to point out which we've been riffing on that concept that's basically enterprise cloud mean donut. Hybrid cloud applications are gonna drive. The value on our premises is that they're going to be customer requirements that traditionally wouldn't have fit in the product. Marketing, management, featureless customs. Gonna define what they want. They'll build it, and then they'll dictate to the infrastructure to make it run. What? We can't do that yet. It'll be, Yes, we cannot be enabled to be dynamics. This is a a new cloud. 2.0, feature. This changes the complete game on suppliers >> completely agree. You know to your point, because, you know, you bring it thio back toward civilization. We've been going higher up the stack on So Day zero virtualization infrastructure will virtual eyes. So the line off abstraction has just been climbing from hardware retort realization next to like, you know, Pat platform of the service, and you kind of were working up our way down infrastructure. Now that base infrastructure platform looks like plants. Right? >> And there were times out a little bit over here. On the upside, you meet in the middle of >> it in the middle >> that is Hello, >> absolutely so ap and at middle wears shrinking down this way. Infrastructures. You know that the cloud incriminating stride in the middle to say, Well, that's a bit of, you know, infrastructure is a Kodak and pull. He's a bit of a AP AP eyes I can can I draw from And that's kind of nice future middleware. But our dad, I >> mean, I think applications air in charge, right? I mean, that's not sure That's the dynamic. That's the way it should be. But it never was that way before is basically the infrastructure was your gating factor. The network exact cloud two points Network security data. Yes, Dev Ops. A true Dev Ops Devane, Ops, Infrastructures Code. >> The only point I wanted to add is the reason the emphasis on abscess change acts in the past. Used to be a business support system after today is business. >> Yeah, I mean, it's >> really or you're you're gonna live or die based on the digital services you provide your customers. The other thing I was going to say about cloud 2.0, is that it's also becoming increasingly clear when we Dr customers that, um, customers are realizing Cloud is not a place right. There was this kind of cloud. One point it was okay. Big honking data centers, hyper skaters will be found now is that customers have gone through that process of and there's a lot more maturity in terms of understanding. What is good, better running on premises. What is what's better running in public Cloud? There's a place for both of them and that, um, and the cloud is actually the automation, the service delivery. It's Maurin operation and a way of being almost than a place. >> And what is it? Well, what does it do for you all? Then, in terms of challenge, especially at your teams, because you talk about all this customization, you're allowing the application to almost drive. You know, you're changing places in terms of who's the power of the relationship? Yes. Oh, me, yeah, How what? What does that do for you? Oh, in terms of how you approach that, how you change of mindset and how you change what you deliver? >> I think John, it's the way I think about it is that both daily emcee in Vienna, or any technology provider that's worth their salt is in the business of building platforms. Right? And platforms are essentially extensible. They're really they really provide a foundation that other people can innovate on top of it. And that's how I think you handled the customers issue. If one thing I think we can all agree on is that I t has always taught us there's no one size fits. All right? Right. So I think providing choice along every single dimension is super important for our >> customers. Yeah, I think that platform thing is a huge point. And I was gonna ask that question before John got jumped in because one of the things that you just brought up was platform is you guys have to build an enabling platform. One as suppliers. Okay, The successful cloud to point out cos are ones that are innovating in weird areas. Monitoring, for instance, they who will have thought that monitoring now observe ability would be such a massive, lucrative sector four. I pose M and A Why? Because it's data. It's instrumentation. This is operating system kind of thinking here is like network. So thinking like a platform on the supplier size one, the customers got to start thinking like a platform because their stakeholders air their internal developers or a P I shipping to suppliers. This is new for enterprises. This is news requires full hybrid capability. This requires date at the center of the value proposition. >> That's again the biggest value is business and I tr coming together on the area of applications and data. Yeah, that's starting up giving because the successful businesses are the ones who leveraged. Those guys have failed in the future, or the ones who don't pay attention to how critical applications are to the business logic and how critical data is to be able to mine and get the behavioral analytics to get ahead. And >> now the challenge in all this. But I'm learning and covering some of the public sector activity from the C I. A contract Jedi with Amazon to we had Raytheon Her here earlier is another customer example with another client is that procurement? And how they do business is not just a technical thing. There's like all this old legacy, things like, How do you procure technology, who you hire her and we hire developers? We build our own stack, so there's a lot of things going on. >> Yes, and you know, it's really interesting on the even on the procurement front, how our customers experience with Cloud has changed expectations, right, And that's really what we're doing with the McLaren DMC is what customers told us is, Hey, I love the agility of the cloud portal based access. Easy procurement. I love just being able to click a button and not have to navigate all this complexity. I need that for my own premises infrastructure. Imagine FRA structure. And that's, you know, in an example, while all of these dynamics are really all converging, >> well, if you can create abstraction, layer on a level of complexity and make things easy, simple and affordable, that's good business. Model >> one of our customers without taking the name right. The massive retailer you know they're spinning up, um, the retail outlets like crazy. They measure success in This was one truck roll, so they wanna have the entire infrastructure come into stand up one of the retail outlets in one truck roll. When everything comes in one button push that everything gets in a provision and up together. >> So that means I gotta have full software instrumentation automation Got intelligence. This is kind of where cloud 2.0, will lead us all >> likely. And that's expectation now that they go so fast and deploying this one Truck roll Hardware's there. Switch it on from the cloud it stood up and they're in operation 24 hours. >> Well, guys, we're going to get you on our power panels in our Palace of studio on this topic cloudy. But it's gonna be very aggressive and controversial topic because it's going to challenge the status quo. And that's really what this we're talking about >> that's in our DNA. >> And the good news is that that's more time with John. >> So as we before, we say so long, we've talked about clients. We talked about the folks you bet here. We talked about the presentation on this thing and what they're all getting out of it. What are you getting out of this? I mean, what are your takeaways? As you had back to your respective work orders, you get first. Okay? >> I think for me the biggest takeaway is just how incredibly vibrant via more user communities. I mean, it is unlike anything else I've seen before and now with the things like Project Pacific. I just feel like it's It's an opportunity for this community to be able to take the skills they have right now and actually go into this brave new world of containers with so much help forces having to do this all by yourself. Which means it's gonna be, you know, if you think about how largest community is, think about how much innovation this will spore in the container space and because of that in the application space and then because of that in business is I mean, this is a It just feels like a tipping point for me >> to me. Sure, I got high fives from every tech geek, you know, when we came out, you know, I also on our technical advisory boats for the company that these are the hot core geeks who were followed and you know us to the, you know, these were the fans and they were like, you know, they always kind of like if you walk out of them and you talk to them and they, uh how did it work? Because they my bar, you have a very high bar. They cut through all your marketing messaging. They go right to the hay. Is there meet in this And the high fives? I got the hajj. I got out. This is like, guys, you're nailing it. That's enough to tell me that a This is, like, 10 years ago. Yeah, that body. It's like you're so busy. I'm still smiling because the energy is I >> can't give you a hug. Give me a high five. Right. Good work, gentlemen. Thanks for the time. Always, he's still smiling to >> get you to a step. >> Good deal. Thanks for being with us. Thank you. Live on the Cube. You're watching our coverage in world 2019. Where? San Francisco. Back with more. Right after this.

Published Date : Aug 29 2019

SUMMARY :

brought to you by IBM Wear and its ecosystem partners. M. C. Good to see you today. How can you don't get excited? Do you guys have made? Good to see you again. the way, you might be the busiest guy here. you know, the customers and partners and press. Yeah, hose them from 10 to 4. that people are coming to you with, or or the concerns or maybe just the things they want to talk about being And it was very, you know, the the analyst to bring together, as you know, in Tansy has landed in Bill Run Manage So you guys are going down there. the service, is that you know, both of'em were and l e m c bring the customers we think we have. Adele the emcee for the VM. Yeah, there's there's there's just so much good Doctor Wait forever drank the town about. The most important thing that people should should know about it, So a lot of scripting a lot of manual, you know, work command you know, environments, application choice. They'll take hardware and you know, So that's the DNA that you guys have. realization next to like, you know, Pat platform of the service, and you kind of were working On the upside, you meet in the middle of You know that the cloud incriminating stride in the middle to say, Well, that's a bit of, I mean, that's not sure That's the dynamic. Used to be a business support system after today is business. the service delivery. Oh, in terms of how you approach that, how you change of mindset and how you change And that's how I think you handled the customers issue. because one of the things that you just brought up was platform is you guys have to build an enabling platform. and how critical data is to be able to mine and get the behavioral analytics to get ahead. There's like all this old legacy, things like, How do you procure technology, Yes, and you know, it's really interesting on the even on the procurement front, how our customers well, if you can create abstraction, layer on a level of complexity and make things easy, The massive retailer you know they're spinning This is kind of where cloud 2.0, will lead us all Switch it on from the cloud it stood up and they're in operation 24 hours. Well, guys, we're going to get you on our power panels in our Palace of studio on this topic cloudy. We talked about the folks you bet here. you know, if you think about how largest community is, think about how much innovation this will spore in the container space when we came out, you know, I also on our technical advisory boats for the company that these are the hot can't give you a hug. Live on the Cube.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

ViennaLOCATION

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

Asia PacificLOCATION

0.99+

two hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

AsiaLOCATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

Varun ChabrolPERSON

0.99+

AdelePERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

500 folksQUANTITY

0.99+

Della Bella TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

24 hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

Del TechnologyORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

V. M. R.PERSON

0.99+

American FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

1300 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

Varun ChhabraPERSON

0.99+

HPORGANIZATION

0.99+

Locke FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

McLaren DMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

sevenQUANTITY

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

YesterdayDATE

0.99+

78 different brandsQUANTITY

0.99+

Big TommyORGANIZATION

0.99+

two aspectsQUANTITY

0.99+

One pointQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

GMORGANIZATION

0.98+

twoQUANTITY

0.98+

2019DATE

0.98+

one platformQUANTITY

0.98+

10th yearQUANTITY

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

Moscone CenterLOCATION

0.98+

one truck rollQUANTITY

0.98+

29 teensQUANTITY

0.98+

Infrastructure Plot FoundationORGANIZATION

0.98+

two broad areasQUANTITY

0.97+

DalePERSON

0.97+

Del TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.97+

10 years agoDATE

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

Dell EMCORGANIZATION

0.97+

this weekDATE

0.97+

IranLOCATION

0.97+

First strategyQUANTITY

0.96+

one buttonQUANTITY

0.96+

Project PacificORGANIZATION

0.95+

DelhiLOCATION

0.94+

10QUANTITY

0.94+

two pointsQUANTITY

0.93+

BrandonPERSON

0.93+

John WallPERSON

0.93+

Han XuePERSON

0.93+

Moon Young Man AzzedinePERSON

0.93+

140QUANTITY

0.92+

G C P 4000 plusCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.92+

4QUANTITY

0.92+

KodakORGANIZATION

0.91+

one thingQUANTITY

0.91+

Muneyb MinhazuddinPERSON

0.91+

Flat FoundationORGANIZATION

0.91+

De Liam SeasidePERSON

0.88+

Veum wearORGANIZATION

0.88+

ChuyPERSON

0.88+

Veum World 2019EVENT

0.88+

140 press media analystQUANTITY

0.87+

RaytheonORGANIZATION

0.85+

Mike Adams & Ziv Kalmanovich, VMware | VMworld 2019


 

>> lie from San Francisco celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum World 2019. Brought to you by VM Wear and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back to the cubes. Live coverage here in San Francisco, California, for VM World 2019. I'm Jeff Davis Davis, our 10th year, 10 years covering the M world. Quite a run. Got a great stories. More stories coming, Emma days. A lot of organic growth. A lot of typos in the startup scene. Our next two guests Mike Adams, CIA Director bm wear and Ziv Kalman. Oh, vich product line manager here. Welcome to the Cube. Great to see you. Yes, Curtsy to you guys. Got a lot of activity happening around bit fusion. A lot of news to share. Exciting. I mean, in the M. And a story has been high on VM. Where we talking back? Elsie earlier. Continue to fill in on the strategy. >> Yeah, absolutely. Give us the update. Yeah, I think the key thing for us is we really want to become a key player in the A. I am l space and say that those workloads should come on visa. And with this acquisition we think, provides a great framework for a lot of the hardware accelerator devices. The best of you known of those his GP use. But we think there's four coming market with PG A's and also custom a six. So we're super excited about that. >> For the folks that don't know much about the acquisition, what was the motivation? What was the company's core product? What was the interest? Yeah, the >> company had a product called Flex Direct, and that particular product was really focused on taking, ah, similar concept that a lot of V m writes No, which was, Hey, we knew that computes space. We were trying to take these isolated islands and pull them together. Same type of thing. Here you had these expensive devices that people were buying and they were isolated. And now if we could take a single server, it's got a bunch of GP use on it. Why don't we share it? You see all these papers that come out around machine learning at the very end. It says she's I'm amazed that thes GP user so underutilized even when we're actually using them. It's kind of like buying a car and then using the radio only right? Doesn't. It just doesn't make sense. I >> got this trend of alternative processors just sort of exploding all over the place. I mean, obviously in video, sort of people know what's going on there, but but you've got arm. Now you've got the edge coming in, you know, Intel. Still dominant in the server space. But even even storage devices today use different type, not in the not Intel processors in there. It's a combination of our mo are Sometimes you know, G. P uses you say F g a Z, even though they're sort of a narrow use case. You're seeing a six make a comeback. So you got all this additional processing power, you know, going. So that's a tailwind. Absolutely, guys, and it's sort of the intersection of those to maybe talk about some of the trends you see in that regard and how you're taking advantage of them. >> Yeah, it reminds me of many moons ago when we had new chips that were coming out. We said, Jesus, hardware, flurry here, right? And now we're in a really similar spot. Ziv and I see a lot of different types of devices and acceleration devices, whether it's computer network or storage. And in this particular case, right, we just see a hotbed of all these customers that air seeing the same problem, right? And we've got great partnerships with Intel you mentioned in video and and many others. And we just want to really leverage those for these devices because you look at V sphere and say, OK, your traditional workloads. We've done those very, very well. But as we get into containers, KUBERNETES, machine Learning and I, we want these newer cloud native and newer workloads to come our way. And taking advantage of these new capabilities really helps accelerate that in a big way. >> Could you >> explain Maur on the the sphere impact? Because, you know, first of all, of'em, where community you get the feedback right away on Twitter and a lot of things. But sometimes you gotta dig in and find out what people are thinking and where there might. I think that could be future up opportunities or because it meets skepticism. Well, the the sphere native having a eye on the sphere, that's just mind blowing to me. But I mean, I can see I can see a data processor kind of vibe going on here where data needs to be processed. That seems to be a trend. What is it going on with the sphere with this? Is there what's the what's to customers? No. >> Well, I think the first thing to clarify here is that, you know, some often there is this question. Why would Iran m Ellery I work? Look specifically envy. Sphere is a platform. But then customers do run Emily and workers and public clouds. And those layers are not that different than the spirits virtualization layer, and they're running it in virtual machines. So the whole idea would be fusion specifically, is it? Actually, we can make it even more efficient to run these workloads on top of the sphere because the underlying infrastructure that you two actually, you have to accelerate these workloads there. Today they are mostly GP use, obviously, but in the futures, Michael so mentioned you a six are coming in and effigies are coming in. We are going to make those as well. That's the plan using the B fusion framework. Be more efficient to use. A lot >> of people are skeptical around running machine learning on these are not skeptical because, I mean, it's great for any time you have the opportunity to automate something or used software to make something go away. That's not the difference. You're undifferentiated, so it makes sense. But I just can't figure out where, specifically, within these fears of being targeted to use >> where envy sphere as in, Well, >> if I'm operating the sphere on top operator, I got Debs kicking around the corner. I got a cloud Mom reclaiming. Where's this fit in? Where >> this fits into essentially any place for a visa is running. It doesn't matter if it would run on via MacLeod and for any other for cloud partnerships or on the the edge of our Vesey runs. This is a core capability of the sphere, so it doesn't matter. You know where physically or infrastructure is, we would be able to expose this technology. The idea is also that you mentioned the trends in the A six as they're coming into the enterprise. There's an architectural changes also coming in, and in the server perspective, it's just it's the servers are actually getting more dense there, in there, in there in the accelerator infrastructure that they have in them. So you're seeing four to a GP using a single server. Those are very powerful machines. You can just move oil, represent a single machine again. That brings us back to be fusion and descend. The segregated model affects territory used, which is very similar by the way to centralize stories use. >> You guys are on something really big here. I think that hardware assists off load anything. Hardware system, harbor off load is gonna be a more of a bigger trend. And we saw it happen big time and hyper converge just for storage and everything. But I think as you want to stack where kubernetes gonna flourish? Yeah. I mean, imagine all the service is that he turned on Turned off. I mean, that's not I mean, men even know when it gets turned on or off. >> Absolutely offload for awhile with things like a raise, right, trying to push processing off to a bigger ray that you've got there. And then one other thing you said that I think was really important is the audience, right? If you look at a i n m l, we have traditionally haven't talked to the data, scientists of the machine learning folks. And we need to get to the I t. Folks that air supporting those workloads saying similar to some other workloads that were new and saying these were gonna come your way. And so we need to be prepared and you need to be able to leverage. So >> what's the What's the pitch to those folks? What's that? What's what you guys saying to them? Because it is a benefit for Debs and Dev Ops is to have an ops right. You got the ops down. Okay, see that and this change happening. But a dev, What's the pitch? But how do you get their attention? What's the value proposition? >> The the Actually, that's the beauty of it. It's exactly the same bottle proposition that the sphere in Vienna, where the Vienna state provides the developers and the only thing is that now we are letting the the office people to actually provide this doing this infrastructure as well in the same efficient manner. So it's your transformation. Basically, it's giving the exact same value proposition. >> Talk about the multi cloud tie in here. We've heard a lot about multi cloud and I think multi cloud in part anyway, is being able to run any application and workload anywhere. And one of things about your technology is the ability to not have to rewrite the application to take advantage of acceleration. Does it fit into multi cloud? And if so, how? >> Yeah, when we made the bet Fusion acquisition, if you look at their story, they had the any any any story as well, just like we do. And so, you know, we made announcement this week within video and eight of us and VM, where it's definitely possible of the technology that we have to extend that even further. And so, you know, the only thing I know with users going forward is they're gonna have more than one cloud, and so we just need to prepare for that and make sure that it works. And it works well across the board and the common layer. When you look at our multi cloud strategy is vey sphere is going to be at each of those layers. So if it's ties in disease here, it should be pretty easy to make it work in each of those environments. >> What was that What was the announcement you made you share? The big >> one was being able to use in video in the context of cloud in AWS. So's GPU capabilities and bring it to the service as we do on Prem. And so that was a big piece. And then we also obviously, in making that announcement talking about Hey, you know, this is a critical area for us because not only are we doing this, but we're also saying that your bit fusion will help enhance this because we think in video and bit fusion work very well together as well. >> And is that a product of service? Ah, go to market initiative. >> In the case of the coordinated us, it would be offered as part of the service. So when you can consume the compute, you know you want a GPU, it'll be there for you to help run that workload in the cloud. >> And that's available. When >> that's an nvidia in AWS kind of question. When they are making that infrastructure available, it's essentially going to be a nun. In another instance, type that the ember cloud in AWS will offer okay, I >> mean, it's a tech preview. >> What if some of the things that people should know about because again, in the pattern I'm seeing here of'em world is as in love to stack with kubernetes being that abstraction layer that guessing eyes promoting heavily on rightfully so. We're big fans communes with that for the beginning is that you're gonna have this this purpose built, um, native capability so that when you guys got this native vibe going on native to hype the sphere native TSX native, what does that actually mean? Native like Cooper, naked native on I. But what does it native mean? Explain to the audience what that actually means. >> I'll start up. Sure. You could >> elaborate 30 minutes if you want. But what is that >> true native native? The idea >> for us was used kubernetes really two ways. You know, most of the time when we were talking about Cooper Naser Containers, it's running that on top of these Fair right? What happens if you could take the DNA of that and put it actually inside of east here? Right, so not only you could run these clusters and native pods, but you could also leverage some of the value and one of the things that Cubans does really well is it handles workloads really well. So if we take an example where we have 145 e ems and they make up your app, right, normally you'd have to go to each one of those and figure out OK, let's make some changes in tweaks. And now what I can do is I can treat all of those is one workload and I can move them. I could do really interesting things with that. And that's the power one of the powers that you have with Kubernetes. >> And that's where the differentiation. Then you don't think that there's a >> Yeah, exactly. I mean you are essentially getting There are a lot of benefits our customers, our values value that the customer is getting today from V Sphere, generically speaking, and our longtime customers are familiar with the value propositions. And what we are saying is that when you're getting something as a native capability is that essentially ties into all the other capabilities that you already were know very well and you will be able to get those. But with on top on, sometimes on top orbit in conjunction with what >> is that gonna enable? Now let's talk about the enablement. >> So let's go back all the way. If you go all the way back to be fusion, for example, if you enable it is a native technology, then if you're running containers or viens on the sphere natively they can consume to be fusion technology. If you have cool, it is. It can orchestrate natively, the PM's and containers that are using the confusion to collision. Excited. Oh, so this is the whole thing, >> more efficient platform standpoint, >> and it's easier to manage as well, because you don't have to install a bunch of stuff on top of each other because it's needed. It's part of the first. >> A lot of hassle go away that people might >> take it in and you're gonna have to guess tomorrow they're going to go deep into it with >> you. Great, we're excited. So we're hearing a lot, obviously, but kubernetes at this event and and but most of the audience, they're not developers. So how can you use the sort of bit Fusion mojo to attract developers for some of these new workloads, that air come into the marketplace? >> Yeah, I mean it's all about acquiring new audiences in a case of infusions. More the data scientists. In the case of the communities, it's more around the developer. But I think let's use the kubernetes examples as a good one and what we announced with Project Pacific. Basically, the way it looks, the technology looks to them. It'll look like the kubernetes, a p I with a little bit of east for goodness from the operator perspective, the people that we know the 20,000 that are here, it looks to them like the sphere was from kubernetes Goodness. So that's the right mix is you've got to get it. So it looks exactly the smells and feels just like what they're used to. And I think that's a that's a key aspect. And then for the data Scientists with fusion, we really need to say Okay, you know you want to run these workloads, but she's you're paying really a lot of money for these expensive, isolated devices, and you could get more value by kind of grouping them up and making sure that they're used kind of in aggregate, right? >> So there's more leverage on the data science side So if I'm say hiring someone I know I'm or more to work with with >> exactly, essentially, it's it's the same story. They don't need to change their applications, their framework. Their models use the same could interface, which is the GPU interface for for the GPS computer. >> So So let's talk about that. So data scientist, you know, they always complain that most their time is spent wrangling data That's their, you know, bugaboo. And then there's a collaboration between data scientists and developers, which probably doesn't happen enough. What are you seeing in terms of the trends from the data science role? And can you help solve some of those problems? >> Well, what we are about to solve is really access access to infrastructure for them. Easy access to the infrastructure in their software stack. And the way to get there is to make the data engineers that serve these data scientists and the application administrators that surges data scientist to get easy access to the infrastructure Dany to provide the software, and that's where the sphere eventually comes in. So it's not the Celia direct relationship with the end users. It's more enabling the entire organization that actually served these end users and let them use as much infrastructure as your partners. And >> that and that and user organization. The buffer >> guys last question share what the plans are. What's next? What's your goals for the next 6 to 12 months? I'll see. Get the acquisition under your belt. Native in these fear, a lot of other cool things. I mean that I could talk about >> customers and maybe you can talk about product from a customer perspective. You know, we want engage in proof of concepts. So we want to bring them in, let them test out the software. It already works with the beast here, so I'll be running with multiple proof of concepts across the globe. We >> use cases in the U. S. Case or what? >> Yeah, I mean, it's it's pretty simple at the moment. It seems to be most people that are using GP use around ml. We have a great demo down the floor that shows people trying to run inception, three year resident 50 And how can we actually help those v EMs that are running that? So that's gonna be my focus. The next six >> years you want get some use cases come over here, bring him up to Mike. >> And from that perspective, I mean, obviously, we acquired occasion in an early stage. The technology works well. It works well enough to be product eyes. However, Veum, wherein the sphere has very high enterprise software stone standards in terms of security and management and governance. All this capabilities so that's going to be are focused on the next, you know, even almost a year to make sure that we bring it up to a level where we can confidently provide it and sell. It is a product >> you gotta engineering hye bar there absolutely thanks to Russia coming on keeping the update, the end world coverage Breaking it down. 2019. It's the Cuba job for David. Thanks for watching Be back with more after this short break.

Published Date : Aug 27 2019

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by VM Wear and its ecosystem partners. Yes, Curtsy to you guys. The best of you known And now if we could take a single server, Absolutely, guys, and it's sort of the intersection of those to maybe talk about some of the trends you see in that regard and how And we just want to really leverage those for these devices because you look at V sphere and say, of'em, where community you get the feedback right away on Twitter and a lot of things. So the whole idea would be fusion specifically, I mean, it's great for any time you have the opportunity to automate something or used software to make if I'm operating the sphere on top operator, I got Debs kicking around the corner. The idea is also that you mentioned the But I think as you want to stack where And so we need to be prepared and you need to be able to leverage. What's what you guys saying to them? It's exactly the same bottle proposition that the sphere Talk about the multi cloud tie in here. And so, you know, the only thing I know with users going forward is they're gonna have more than one cloud, you know, this is a critical area for us because not only are we doing this, but we're also saying that your bit And is that a product of service? the compute, you know you want a GPU, it'll be there for you to help run that workload in the cloud. And that's available. it's essentially going to be a nun. that when you guys got this native vibe going on native to hype the sphere native TSX I'll start up. elaborate 30 minutes if you want. And that's the power one of the powers that you have with Kubernetes. Then you don't think that there's a I mean you are essentially getting There are a lot of benefits our customers, Now let's talk about the enablement. So let's go back all the way. and it's easier to manage as well, because you don't have to install a bunch of stuff on top of each other because it's So how can you use the sort of bit Fusion a lot of money for these expensive, isolated devices, and you could get more value by kind of grouping them up exactly, essentially, it's it's the same story. So data scientist, you know, they always complain that most their time is spent wrangling So it's not the Celia direct relationship with the end users. that and that and user organization. Get the acquisition under your belt. customers and maybe you can talk about product from a customer perspective. Yeah, I mean, it's it's pretty simple at the moment. All this capabilities so that's going to be are focused on the next, you know, even almost a year to you gotta engineering hye bar there absolutely thanks to Russia coming on keeping the update,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
MikePERSON

0.99+

Mike AdamsPERSON

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

MichaelPERSON

0.99+

Ziv KalmanPERSON

0.99+

Ziv KalmanovichPERSON

0.99+

ViennaLOCATION

0.99+

eightQUANTITY

0.99+

10th yearQUANTITY

0.99+

30 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

CIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeff Davis DavisPERSON

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

San Francisco, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

eachQUANTITY

0.98+

CooperPERSON

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

three yearQUANTITY

0.98+

two waysQUANTITY

0.98+

ElleryPERSON

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.98+

V SphereORGANIZATION

0.97+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.97+

more than one cloudQUANTITY

0.97+

U. S.LOCATION

0.97+

20,000QUANTITY

0.97+

CubaLOCATION

0.97+

single machineQUANTITY

0.97+

firstQUANTITY

0.96+

tomorrowDATE

0.96+

single serverQUANTITY

0.96+

CubansPERSON

0.96+

145 e emsQUANTITY

0.96+

VM World 2019EVENT

0.95+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.95+

two guestsQUANTITY

0.95+

sixQUANTITY

0.95+

50QUANTITY

0.94+

fourQUANTITY

0.94+

12 monthsQUANTITY

0.94+

VMworldORGANIZATION

0.93+

first thingQUANTITY

0.92+

VM WearORGANIZATION

0.9+

6QUANTITY

0.89+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.89+

Cooper Naser ContainersORGANIZATION

0.88+

VeseyORGANIZATION

0.88+

CeliaPERSON

0.86+

IranORGANIZATION

0.84+

nvidiaORGANIZATION

0.83+

each oneQUANTITY

0.82+

ElsiePERSON

0.78+

many moons agoDATE

0.77+

a yearQUANTITY

0.76+

A sixCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.75+

KUBERNETESORGANIZATION

0.73+

Project PacificORGANIZATION

0.7+

CurtsyPERSON

0.69+

MaurPERSON

0.68+

JesusPERSON

0.67+

almostQUANTITY

0.66+

thingQUANTITY

0.65+

VeumPERSON

0.64+

Veum World 2019EVENT

0.64+

ZivPERSON

0.63+

VMORGANIZATION

0.62+

EmilyTITLE

0.62+

MacLeodORGANIZATION

0.58+

SphereTITLE

0.58+

PPERSON

0.57+

yearsQUANTITY

0.55+

RussiaLOCATION

0.54+

EmmaPERSON

0.53+

DirectORGANIZATION

0.53+

marketQUANTITY

0.52+

Power Panel: Is IIOT the New Battleground? CUBE Conversation, August 2019


 

(energetic music) >> Announcer: From our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley; Palo Alto, California. This is a CUBE Conversation. >> Hi everyone, welcome to this special CUBE Power Panel recorded here in Palo Alto, California. We've got remote guests from around the Internet. We have Evan Anderson, Mark Anderson, Phil Lohaus. Thanks for comin' on. Evan is with INVNT/IP, an organization with companies and individuals that fight nation-sponsored intellectual property theft and also author of the huge report Theft Nation Almost a 100 pages of really comprehensive analysis on it. Mark Anderson with the Future in Review CEO of Pattern, Computer and Strategic New Service Chairman of Future in Review Conference, and author of the book "The Pattern Future: "Find the World's Greatest Secrets "and Predicting the Future Using Discovery Patterns" and Phil Lohaus, American Enterprise Institute. Former intelligent analyst, researcher at the American Enterprise Institute, studying competitive strategy and emerging technologies. Guys, thanks for coming on. This topic is, is industrial IoT the new battleground? Mark, you cover the Future Review. Security is the battleground. It's not just a silo'd space. It's horizontally scalable across every single touch point of the Internet, individuals, national security, companies, global, what's your perspective on this new battleground? >> Well, thank you, I took some time and watched your last presentation on this, which I thought was excellent. And maybe I'll try to pick up from there. There's a lot of discussion there about the technical aspects of IoT, or IIoT, and some of the weaknesses, you know firewalls failing, assuming that someone's in your network. But I think that there's a deeper aspect to this. And the problem I think, John, is that yes, they are in your network already, but the deeper problem here is, who is it? Is it an individual? Is it a state? And whoever it is, I'm going to put something out that I think is going to be worth talking more deeply about, and that is, if people who can do the most damage are already in there, and are ready to do it, the question isn't "Can they?" It's "Why have they not?" And so literally, I think if you ask world leaders today, are they in the electric grid? Yes. Is Russia in ours, are we in theirs? Yes. If you said, is China in our most important areas of enterprise? Absolutely. Is Iran in our banks and so forth? They are. And you actually see states of war going on, that are nuisances, but are not what you might call Cybergeddon. And I really believe that the world leaders are truly afraid. Perhaps more afraid of that than of nuclear war. So the amount of death and destruction that could happen if everybody cut loose at the same time, is so horrifying, my guess is that there's a human restraint involved in this, but that technically, it's already game over. >> Phil, Cybergeddon, I love that term, because that's a part of our theme here, is apocalypse now or later? Industrial IoT, or IIoT, or the Internet, all these touch points are creating a surface area that for penetration's purposes, any packet can get in. Nation-states, malware, you name it. It's all problem. But this is the new war battleground. This is now digital Cybergeddon. Forget the wall on the southern border, physical wall. We're talking about a digital wall. We have major threats going on to our society in the United States, and global. This is new, rules of engagement, or no rules of engagement on how to compete in a digital war. This is something that the government's supposed to protect us for. I mean, if someone drops troops in California, physical people, the government's supposed to stop that. But if it's a digital war, it's packets. And the companies are responsible for all this. This doesn't make any sense to me. Break it down, what's the problem? And how do we solve this? >> Sure, well the problem is is that we're actually facing different kinds of threats than we were typically used to facing in the past. So in the past when we go to war, we may have a problem with a foreign country, or a conflict is coming up. We tend to, and by we I mean the United States, we tend to think of these things as we're going to send troops in, or we're going to actually have a physical fight, or we're going to have some other kind of decisive culmination of events, end of a conflict. What we're dealing with now is very different. And it's actually something that isn't entirely new. But the adversaries that we're facing now, so let's say China, Russia, and Iran, just to kind of throw them into some buckets, they think about war very differently. They think about the information space more broadly, and partially because they've been so used to having to kind of be catching up to America in terms of technology, they found other ways to compete with America, and ways that we really haven't been focusing on. And that really, I would argue, extends most prominently to the information space. And by the information space I'm speaking very broadly. I'm talking about, not just information in terms of social media, and emails, and things like that, but also things like what we're talking about today, like IIoT. And these are new threat landscapes, and ones where our competitors have a integrated way of approaching the conflict, one in which the state and private sectors kind of are molded or fused or at least are compelled to work together and we have a very different space here in the United States. And I'm happy to unpack that as we talk about that today, but what we're now facing, is not just about technical capabilities, it's about differences in governing systems, differences in governing paradigms. And so it's much bigger than just talking about the technical specifics. >> Evan, I want you to weigh in on this because one of the things that I feel strongly about, and this is pretty obvious from the commentary, and experts I talk to is, the United States has always been good at defending itself physically, you know war, in being places. Digitally, we've been really good at offense, but terrible on defense, has been the metaphor. I spoke with former four-star General Keith Alexander, who ran the NSA and was first commander of the cyber command, who is now the CEO of IronNet. He and I were talking on-camera and privately and he's saying, "Look it. "we suck at defense digitally. "We're great at offense, we can take someone out "on the offense." But we're talking about IoT, about monitoring. These are technical challenges. This is network nerds, and software engineers have to solve this problem with the prism of defense. This is a new paradigm. This is what we're kind of getting to. And Mark, you kind of addressed it. But this is the challenge. IoT is going to create more points that we have to defend that we suck now at defending, how are we going to get better. This is the paradox. >> Yeah, I think that's certainly accurate. And one of our problems here is that as a society we've always been open. And that was how the Internet was born. And so we have a real paradigm shift now from a world in which the U.S. was leading an open world, that was using the Internet for, I mean there have been problems with security since day one, but originally the Internet was an information-sharing exercise. And we reached a point in human history now where there are enough malicious hackers that have the capabilities we didn't want them to have, but we need to change that outlook. So, looking at things like Industrial IoT, what you're seeing is not so much that this is the battlefield in specific, it's that everything like it is now the battlefield. So in my work specifically we're focused more on economic problems. Economic conflicts and strategies. And if you look at the doctrines that have come out of our adversaries in the last decade, or really 20 years, they very much did what Phil said, and they looked at our weaknesses, and one of those biggest weaknesses that we've always had is that an open society is also unable necessarily to completely defend itself from those who would seek to exploit that openness. And so we have to figure out as a society, and I believe we are. We're running a fine line, we're negotiating this tightrope right now that involves defending the values and the foundational critical aspects of our society that require openness, while also making sure that all the doors aren't open for adversaries. And so we'll continue to deal with that as a society. Everything is now a battlefield and a much grayer area, and IoT certainly isn't helping. And that's why we have to work so hard on it. >> I want to talk about the economic piece on the next talk track of rounds. Theft, and intellectual property that you cover deeply. But Mark and Phil, this notion of Cybergeddon meets the fact that we have to be more defensive. Again, principles of openness are out there. I mean, we have open source. There is a potential path here. Open source software has been, I think, depending on who you talk to, fourth generation, or fifth, depending on how old you are, but it's now mainstream enough now. Are we ever going to get to a formula where we can actually be strong in defense as well as just offense with respect to protecting digitally? >> Phil, do you want that? >> Well, yeah, I would just say that I'm glad to hear that General Alexander is confident about our offensive capabilities. But one of the... To NSA that is conducting these offensive capabilities. When we talk about Russia, Iran, China, or even a smaller group, like let's say an extremist group or something like that, there's an integration between command and control, that we simply don't have here in the States. For example, the Panasonic and Sony examples always come to mind, as ones where there are attacks that can happen against American companies that then have larger implications that go beyond just those companies. So and this may not be a case where the NSA is even tracking the threat. There's been some legislation that's come out, rather controversial legislation about so-called hacking back initiatives and things like that. But I think everybody knows that this is already kind of happening. The real question is going to be, how does the public sector, and how does the private sector work together to create this environment where they're working in synergy, rather than at cross purposes? >> Yeah, and this brings up, I've heard this before. I've heard people talk about the fact that open source nation states can actually empower by releasing tools in open source via the Dark Web or other vehicles, to not actually have, quote, their finger prints, on any attacks. This seems to be a tactic. >> Or go through criminals, right? Use proxies, things like that. It's getting even more complicated and Alexander's talked about that as well, right? He's talked about the convergence of crime and nation-state actions. So whereas with nation-states it's already hard-attributed enough, if that's being outsourced to either whether it's patriotic hackers or criminal groups, it's even more difficult. >> I think you know, Keith is a good friend of all of ours, obviously, good guy. His point is a good one. I'd like to take it a little more extreme state and say, defense is worth doing and probably hopeless. (everyone laughs) So, as they always say, all it takes is one failure. So, we always talk about defense, but really, he's right. Offense is easy. You want to go after somebody? We can get them. But if you want to play defense against a trillion potential points of failure, there's no chance. One way to say this is, if we ignore individuals for a moment and just look at nation-states, it's pretty clear that any nation-state of size, that wants to get into a certain network, will get in. And then the question will be, Well, once they're in, can they actually do damage? And the answer is probably yeah, they probably can. Well, why don't they? Why don't they do more damage? We're kind of back to the original premise here, that there's some restraint going on. And I suspect that Keith's absolutely right because in general, they don't want to get attacked. They don't want to have to come back at them what they're about to do to your banks or your grid, and we could do that. We all could do that. So my guess is, there's a little bit of failure on our part to have deep discussions about how great our defenses either are, or are not, when frankly the idea of defense is a good idea, worthwhile idea, but not really achievable. >> Yeah, that's a great point. That comes up a lot where it's like, people don't want retaliation, so it's a big, critical event that happens, that's noticeable as a counterstrike or equivalent. But there's been discussion of the, I call it "the slow bleed" where they push the line of where that is, like slowly infiltrate, and just cause disruption and inconvenience, as a tactic. This has become something we're seeing a lot of. Whether it's misinformation campaigns on fake news, to just disrupting operations slowly over time, and just kind of, 1,000 paper cuts, if you will. Your guys' thoughts on that? Is that something you guys see out there that's happening? >> Well, you saw Iran go after our banks. And we were pushing Iran pretty hard on the sanctions. Everybody knows they did that. It wasn't very much fun for anybody. But what they didn't do is take down the entire banking system. Not sure they could, but they didn't. >> Yeah, I would just add there that you see this on multiple fronts. You see this is by design. I'm sure that Mark is talking about this in his report but... they talk about this incremental approach that over time, this is part of the problem, right? Is that we have a very kind of black or white conception of warfare in this country. And a lot of times, even companies are going to think, well you know, we're at peace, so why would I do something that may actually be construed as something that's warlike or offensive or things like that? But in reality, even though we aren't technically at war, all of these other actors view this as a real conflict. And so we have to get creative about how we think about this within the paradigm that we have and the legal strictures that we have here in this country. >> Well there's no doubt at least in my non-expert military opinion, but as someone who is a techie, been on the Internet from day one, all my life, and all those tools, you guys as well, I personally think we're at war. 100%, there's no debate on that. And I think that we have to get better policy around this and understand it better. Because it's happening. And one of the obvious areas that we see in the news everyday, it's Huawei and intellectual property theft. This is an economic impact. I mean just look at what's happening in Brexit in the U.K. If that was essentially manipulated, that's the ultimate smart bomb, is to just destroy their financial system, which ended up happening through that misinformation. So there are economic realizations here, Evan,that not only come from the misinformation campaigns and other attacks, but there's real value with intellectual property. This is the report you put out. Your thoughts? >> There's very much an active conflict going on in the economic sphere, and that's certainly an excellent point. I think one of the most important things that most of the world doesn't quite understand yet, but our adversaries certainly understand, is that wars are fought for usually, just a few reasons. And there's a lot of different justification that goes on. But often it's for economic benefit. And if you look at human history, and you look at modern history, a lot of wars are fought for some form of economic benefit, often in the form of territory, et cetera, but in the modern age, information can directly and very quite obviously translate into economic benefit. And so when you're bleeding information, you're really bleeding money. And when I say information, again, it's a broad word, but intellectual property, which our definition, here at INVNT/IP is quite broad too, is incredibly valuable. And so if you have an adversary that's consistently removing intellectual property from what I would call our information ecosystem, and our business ecosystem, we're losing a lot of economic value there, and that's what wars are fought over. And so to pretend that this conflict is inactive, and to pretend that the underlying economy and economic strength that is bolstered or created by intellectual property isn't critical would be silly. And so I think we need to look at those kinds of dynamics and the kind of Gerasimov Doctrine, and the essential doctrine of unrestricted warfare that came out of the People's Republic of China are focused on avoiding kinetic conflict while succeeding at the kinds of conflict that are more preferable, particularly in an asymmetric environment. So that's what we're dealing with. >> Mark and Phil, people waking up to this reality are certainly. People in the know are that I talk to, but generally speaking across the board, is this a woke moment for tech? This Armageddon now or later? >> Woke moment for politicians not for tech, I think. I'm sure Phil would agree with this, but the old guard, go back to when Keith was running the NSA. But at that time, there was a very clear distinction between military and economic security. And so when you said security, that meant military. And now all the rules have changed. All the ways CFIUS works in the United States have changed. The legislation is changing, and now if you want to talk about security, most major nations equate economic security with national security. And that wasn't true 10 years ago. >> That's a great point. That's really profound, I totally agree. Phil. >> I think you're seeing a change in realization in Washington about this. I mean, if you look at the cybersecurity strategy of 2018, it specifically says that we're going to be moving from a posture of active defense to one of defending forward. And we can get into the discussion about what those words mean, but the way I usually boil down is it means, going from defending, but maybe a little bit forward, to actually going out and making sure that our interests are protected. And the reason why that's important, and we're talking about offense versus defense here, obviously the reason why, from what Mark was saying, if they're already in the networks, and they haven't actually done anything, it's because they're afraid of what that offensive response could be. So it's important that we selectively demonstrate what costs we could impose on different actors for different kinds of actions, especially knowing that they're already operating inside of our network. >> That's a great point. I mean, I think that's again another profound statement because it's almost like the pin in the grenade. Once they pull it, the damage is done. Again, back to our theme, Armageddon, now or later? What's the answer to this, guys? Is it the push to policy conversation and the potential consequences higher? Get that narrative going. Is it more technical protection in the networks? What's some of the things that people are talking about and thinking about around this? >> And it's really all of the above. So the tough part about this for any society and for our society is that it's expensive to live in a world with this much insecurity. And so when these kind of low-level conflicts are going on, it costs money and it costs resources. And companies had to deal with that. They spent a long time trying to dodge security costs, and now particularly with the advent of new law like the GDPR in Europe, it's becoming untenable not to spend that defensive money, even as a company, right? But we also are looking at a deepening to change policy. And I think there's been a lot of progress made. Mark mentioned the CFIUS reforms. There are a lot of different essentially games of Whack-A-Mole being played all around the world right now figuring out how to chase these security problems that we let go too long, but there's many, many, many fronts that we need to-- >> Whack-A-Mole's a great example. The visualization of that is just horrendous. You know, not the ideal scenario. But I got to get your point on this, because one of the things that comes up all the time in our conversations in theCUBE is, the government's job is to protect our securities. So again, if someone came in, and invaded my town in Palo Alto, it's not my responsibility to fight for the town. Maybe defend my own house. But if I'm a company being attacked by Russia, or China or Iran, isn't it the government's responsibility to protect me as a citizen and the company doing business there? So again, this is kind of the confusion that people have. If somebody's going to defend their hack, I certainly got to put security practices in place. This is new ground for the government, digitally speaking. >> When we started this INVNT/IP project, it was about seven years ago. And I was told by a very smart guy in D.C. that our greatest challenge was going to be American corporations, global corporations. And he was absolutely right. Literally in this fight to protect intellectual property, and to protect the welfare even of corporations, our greatest enemies so far have been American corporations. And they lobby hard for China, while China is busy stealing from them, and stealing from their company, and stealing from their country. All that stuff's going on, on a daily basis and they're in D.C. lobbying in favor of China. Don't do anything to make them mad. >> They're getting their pockets picked at the same time. And they're trying to do business in China. They're getting their pockets picked. That's what you're saying. >> They're going for the quarterly earnings report and that's all. >> So the problem is-- >> Yeah so-- >> The companies themselves are kind of self-inflicted wounds here for them. >> Yes. >> Yeah, just to add to that, on this note, there have been some... Business to settle interest. And this is something you're seeing a little bit more of. There's been legislation through CFIUS and things like that. There have been reforms that discourage the flow of Chinese money in the Silicon Valley. And there's actually a measurable difference in that. Because people just don't want to deal with the paperwork. They don't want to deal with the reputational risk, et cetera, et cetera. And this is really going to be the key challenge, is having policy makers not only that are interested in addressing this issue, because not all of them are even convinced it's a problem, if you can believe it or not, but having them interested and then having them understand the issue in a way that the legislation can actually be helpful and not get in the way of things that we value, such as innovation and entrepreneurialism and things like that. So it's going to take sophisticated policy-making and providing incentives so that companies actually want to participate and helping to make America safer. >> You're so right about the politicians. Capitol Hill's really not educated. I mean I tell my kids, and they ask the same questions, just look at Mark Zuckerberg and Sundar Pichai present to the government. They don't even know what an Android phone versus an iPhone is, nevermind what the Internet, and how this global economy works. This has become a makeup problem of the personnel in Capitol Hill. You guys see any movement? I'm seeing some change with a new guard, a new generation of younger people coming in. Certainly from the military, that's an easy when you see people get this. But a new generation of young millennials who are saying, "Hey, why are we doing this the old way?" and actually becoming more informed. Not being the lawyer at law-making. It's actually more technically savvy. Is there any movement, any bright hope there? >> I think there's a little hope in the sense that at a time when Congress has trouble keeping the lights on, they seem to have bipartisan agreement on this set of issues that we're talking about. So, that's hopeful. You know, we've seen a number of strongly bipartisan issues supported in Congress, with the Senate, with the House, all agreeing that this is an issue for us all, that they need to protect the country. They need to protect IP. They need to extend the definition of security. There's no argument there. And that's a very strange thing in today's D.C. to have no argument between the parties. There's no error between the GOP and the Democrats as far as I can tell. They seem to all agree on this, and so it is hopeful. >> Freedom has its costs and I think this is a new era of modern freedom and warfare and protection and all these dynamics are changing, just like Cloud 2.0 is changing application developers. Guys, this is a really important topic. Thank you so much for coming on, appreciate it. Love to do a follow-up on this again with you guys. Thanks for sharing your insight. Some great, profound statements there, appreciate it. Thank you very much. >> Thank you. >> Thanks for having us. >> It's been a CUBE Power Panel here from Palo Alto, California with Evan Anderson, Mark Anderson, and Phil Lohaus. Thank you guys for coming on. Power Panel: The Next Battleground in Industrial IoT. Security is a big part of it. Thanks for watching, this has been theCUBE. (energetic music)

Published Date : Aug 15 2019

SUMMARY :

Announcer: From our studios in the heart and also author of the huge report Theft Nation And I really believe that the world leaders This is something that the government's And I'm happy to unpack that as we talk about that today, IoT is going to create more points that we have to defend that have the capabilities we didn't want them to have, meets the fact that we have to be more defensive. don't have here in the States. I've heard people talk about the fact that open source and Alexander's talked about that as well, right? And the answer is probably yeah, they probably can. Is that something you guys see And we were pushing Iran pretty hard on the sanctions. and the legal strictures that we have here in this country. This is the report you put out. that most of the world doesn't quite understand yet, People in the know are that I talk to, And now all the rules have changed. That's a great point. And the reason why that's important, Is it the push to policy conversation And it's really all of the above. the government's job is to protect our securities. and to protect the welfare even of corporations, And they're trying to do business in China. They're going for the quarterly earnings report The companies themselves are kind of and not get in the way of things that we value, of the personnel in Capitol Hill. that they need to protect the country. Love to do a follow-up on this again with you guys. Thank you guys for coming on.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
KeithPERSON

0.99+

MarkPERSON

0.99+

Mark AndersonPERSON

0.99+

PhilPERSON

0.99+

PanasonicORGANIZATION

0.99+

Phil LohausPERSON

0.99+

Evan AndersonPERSON

0.99+

American Enterprise InstituteORGANIZATION

0.99+

EvanPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

SonyORGANIZATION

0.99+

AlexanderPERSON

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

HuaweiORGANIZATION

0.99+

Whack-A-MoleTITLE

0.99+

SenateORGANIZATION

0.99+

Sundar PichaiPERSON

0.99+

CongressORGANIZATION

0.99+

August 2019DATE

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

GOPORGANIZATION

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

ChinaLOCATION

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

NSAORGANIZATION

0.99+

IronNetORGANIZATION

0.99+

Palo Alto, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

Capitol HillLOCATION

0.99+

fifthQUANTITY

0.99+

D.C.LOCATION

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

four-starQUANTITY

0.99+

Mark ZuckerbergPERSON

0.99+

U.K.LOCATION

0.99+

RussiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

1,000 paper cutsQUANTITY

0.99+

10 years agoDATE

0.99+

BrexitEVENT

0.99+

ChinaORGANIZATION

0.99+

IranORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

fourth generationQUANTITY

0.98+

People's Republic of ChinaLOCATION

0.98+

CFIUSORGANIZATION

0.98+

WashingtonLOCATION

0.98+

DemocratsORGANIZATION

0.98+

Keith AlexanderPERSON

0.98+

GDPRTITLE

0.98+

20 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.97+

HouseORGANIZATION

0.97+

ArmageddonTITLE

0.97+

AndroidTITLE

0.96+

one failureQUANTITY

0.96+

last decadeDATE

0.95+

Tony Giandomenico, Fortinet's FortiGuard Labs | CUBEConversation, August 2019


 

>> from our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California It is a cute conversation. >> Well, the Special Cube conversation. We are here in Palo Alto, California, Cube studios here. Tony, Gino, Domenico, Who's the senior security strategist and research at for Net and four to guard labs live from Las Vegas. Where Black Hat and then Def Con security activities happening, Tony, also known as Tony G. Tony G. Welcome to this cube conversation. >> Hey, Thanks, John. Thanks for having me. >> So a lot of action happening in Vegas. We just live there all the time with events. You're there on the ground. You guys have seen all the action there. You guys are just published. Your quarterly threat report got a copy of it right here with the threat index on it. Talk about the quarterly global threats report. Because the backdrop that we're living in today, also a year at the conference and the cutting edge is security is impacting businesses that at such a level, we must have shell shock from all the breaches and threats they're going on. Every day you hear another story, another story, another hack, more breaches. It said all time high. >> Yeah, you know, I think a lot of people start to get numb to the whole thing. You know, it's almost like they're kind of throwing your hands up and say, Oh, well, I just kind of give up. I don't know what else to do, but I mean, obviously, there are a lot of different things that you can do to be able to make sure that you secure your cybersecurity program so at least you minimize the risk of these particular routes is happening. But with that said with the Threat Landscape report, what we typically dio is we start out with his overall threat index, and we started this last year. If we fast forward to where we are in this actual cue to report, it's been one year now, and the bad news is that the threats are continuing to increase their getting more sophisticated. The evasion techniques are getting more advanced, and we've seen an uptick of about 4% and threat volume over the year before. Now the silver lining is I think we expected the threat volume to be much higher. So I think you know, though it is continuing to increase. I think the good news is it's probably not increasing as fast as we thought it was going to. >> Well, you know, it's always You have to know what you have to look for. Blood. People talk about what you can't see, and there's a lot of a blind spot that's become a data problem. I just want to let people know that. Confined the report, go to Ford Nets, ah website. There's a block there for the details, all the threat index. But the notable point is is only up 4% from the position year of a year that the attempts are more sophisticated. Guys gotta ask you, Is there stuff that we're not seeing in there? Is there blind spots? What's the net net of the current situation? Because observe ability is a hot topic and cloud computing, which essentially monitoring two point. Oh, but you gotta be able to see everything. Are we seeing everything? What's what's out there? >> Well, I mean, I think us as Ford, a guard on Darcy, have cyber threat in challenges. I think we're seeing a good amount, but when you talk about visibility, if you go back down into the organizations. I think that's where there's There's definitely a gap there because a lot of the conversations that I have with organizations is they don't necessarily have all the visibility they need from cloud all the way down to the end point. So there are some times that you're not gonna be able to catch certain things now. With that said, if we go back to the report at the end of the day, the adversaries have some challenges to be able to break into an organization. And, of course, the obvious one is they have to be able to circumvent our security controls. And I think as a security community, we've gotten a lot better of being able to identify when the threat is coming into an organization. Now, on the flip side, Oh, if you refer back to the minor Attack knowledge base, you'll see a specific tactic category called defense evasions. There's about 60 plus techniques, evasion techniques the adversary has at their disposal, at least that we know may there may be others, but so they do have a lot of opportunity, a lot of different techniques to be able to leverage with that, said There's one technique. It's, ah, disabling security tools that we started seeing a bit of an increase in this last cue to threat landscape report. So a lot of different types of threats and mile where have the capability to be ableto one look at the different processes that may be running on a work station, identifying which one of those processes happen to be security tools and then disabling them whether they're no, maybe they might just be able to turn the no, the actual service off. Or maybe there's something in the registry that they can tweak. That'll disable the actual security control. Um, maybe they'll actually suppress the alerts whatever. They conduce you to make sure that that security control doesn't prevent them from doing that malicious activity. Now, with that said, on the flip side, you know, from an organization for perspective, you want to make sure that you're able to identify when someone's turning on and turning off those security control to any type of alert that might be coming out of that control also. And this is a big one because a lot of organizations and this certainly do this minimize who has the ability to turn those particular security controls on and off. In the worst cases, you don't wanna have all of your employees uh, the you don't want to give them the ability to be able to turn those controls on and off. You're never gonna be ableto baseline. You're never gonna be able to identify a, you know, anomalous activity in the environment, and you're basically gonna lose your visibility. >> I mean, this increase in male wearing exploit activity you guys were pointing out clearly challenge the other thing that the report kind of She's out. I want to get your opinion on this. Is that the The upping? The ante on the evasion tactics has been very big trend. The adversaries are out there. They're upping the ante. You guys, we're upping the guarantees. This game you continue this flight will continues. Talk about this. This feature of upping the ante on evasion tactics. >> Yes. So that's what I was that I was kind of ah, referring to before with all the different types of evasion techniques. But what I will say is most of the all the threats these days all have some type of evasion capabilities. A great example of this is every quarter. If you didn't know. We look at different types of actors and different types of threats, and we find one that's interesting for us to dig into and where create was called an actual playbook, where we want to be able to dissect that particular threat or those threat actor methodologies and be able to determine what other tactics and corresponding techniques, which sometimes of course, includes evasion techniques. Now, the one that we focused on for this quarter was called His Ego's Was Ego, says a specific threat that is an information stealer. So it's gathering information, really based on the mission goals off, whatever that particular campaign is, and it's been around for a while. I'm going all the way back to 2011. Now you might be asking yourself, Why did we actually choose this? Well, there's a couple different reasons. One happens to be the fact that we've seen an uptick in this activity. Usually when we see that it's something we want to dive into a little bit more. Number two. Though this is a tactic of the of the adversary, what they'll do is they'll have their threat there for a little while, and then local doorman. They'll stop using that particular malware. That's no specific sort of threat. They'll let the dust settle that things die down. Organizations will let their guard down a little bit on that specific threat. Security organizations Ah, vendors might actually do the same. Let that digital dust kind of settle, and then they'll come back. Bigger, faster, stronger. And that's exactly what Z ghosted is. Ah, we looked at a specific campaign in this new mall where the new and improved Mauer, where is they're adding in other capabilities for not just being able to siphon information from your machine, but they're also now can capture video from your webcam. Also, the evasion techniques since Iran that particular subject, what they're also able to do is they're looking at their application logs. Your system logs your security logs, the leading them making a lot more difficult from a forensic perspective. Bill, go back and figure out what happened, what that actual malware was doing on the machine. Another interesting one is Ah, there. We're looking at a specific J peg file, so they're looking for that hash. And if the hash was there the axle? Um, our wouldn't run. We didn't know what that was. So we researched a little bit more on What we found out was that J Peg file happened to be a desktop sort of picture for one of the sandboxes. So it knew if that particular J pick was present, it wasn't going to run because it knew it was being analyzed in a sandbox. So that was a second interesting thing. The 3rd 1 that really leaned us towards digging into this is a lot of the actual security community attribute this particular threat back to cyber criminals that are located in China. The specific campaign we were focused on was on a government agency, also in China, So that was kind of interesting. So you're continuing to see these. These mile wears of maybe sort of go dormant for a little bit, but they always seem to come back bigger, faster, stronger. >> And that's by design. This is that long, whole long view that these adversaries we're taking in there as he organized this economy's behind what they're doing. They're targeting this, not just hit and run. It's get in, have a campaign. This long game is very much active. Howto enterprises. Get on, get on top of this. I mean, is it Ah, is it Ah, people process Issue is it's, um, tech from four to guard labs or what? What's what's for the Nets view on this? Because, I mean, I can see that happening all the time. It has >> happened. Yeah, it's It's really it's a combination of everything on this combination. You kind of hit like some of it, its people, its processes and technology. Of course, we have a people shortage of skilled resource is, but that's a key part of it. You always need to have those skills. Resource is also making sure you have the right process. Is how you actually monitoring things. I know. Ah, you know, a lot of folks may not actually be monitoring all the things that they need to be monitoring from, Ah, what is really happening out there on the internet today? So making sure you have clear visibility into your environment and you can understand and maybe getting point in time what your situational awareness is. You you, for my technology perspective, you start to see and this is kind of a trend. We're starting the leverage artificial intelligence, automation. The threats are coming, and it's such a high volume. Once they hit the the environment, instead of taking hours for your incident response to be about, at least you know not necessarily mitigate, but isolate or contain the breach. It takes a while. So if you start to leverage some artificial intelligence and automatic response with the security controls are working together. That's a big that's a big part of it. >> Awesome. Thanks for coming. This is a huge problem. Think no one can let their guard down these days? Certainly with service, they're expanding. We're gonna get to that talk track in the second. I want to get quickly. Get your thoughts on ransom, where this continues to be, a drum that keeps on beating. From a tax standpoint, it's almost as if when when the attackers need money, they just get the same ransomware target again. You know, they get, they pay in. Bitcoin. This is This has been kind of a really lucrative but persistent problem with Ransomware. This what? Where what's going on with Ransomware? What's this state of the report and what's the state of the industry right now in solving that? >> Yeah. You know, we looked into this a little bit in last quarter and actually a few quarters, and this is a continuous sort of trend ransom, where typically is where you know, it's on the cyber crime ecosystem, and a lot of times the actual threat itself is being delivered through some type of ah, phishing email where you need a user to be able to click a langur clicking attachment is usually kind of a pray and spray thing. But what we're seeing is more of ah, no sort of ah, you know, more of a targeted approach. What they'll do is to look for do some reconnaissance on organizations that may not have the security posture that they really need. Tohave, it's not as mature, and they know that they might be able to get that particular ransomware payload in there undetected. So they do a little reconnaissance there, And some of the trend here that we're actually seeing is there looking at externally RTP sessions. There's a lot of RTP sessions, the remote desktop protocol sessions that organizations have externally so they can enter into their environment. But these RTP sessions are basically not a secure as they need to be either week username and passwords or they are vulnerable and haven't actually been passed. They're taking advantage of those they're entering and there and then once they have that initial access into the network, they spread their payload all throughout the environment and hold all those the those devices hostage for a specific ransom. Now, if you don't have the, you know, particular backup strategy to be able to get that ransom we're out of there and get your your information back on those machines again. Sometimes you actually may be forced to pay that ransom. Not that I'm recommending that you sort of do so, but you see, or organizations are decided to go ahead and pay that ransom. And the more they do that, the more the adversary is gonna say, Hey, I'm coming back, and I know I'm gonna be able to get more and more. >> Yeah, because they don't usually fix the problem or they come back in and it's like a bank. Open bank blank check for them. They come in and keep on hitting >> Yeah >> same target over and over again. We've seen that at hospitals. We've seen it kind of the the more anemic I t department where they don't have the full guard capabilities there. >> Yeah, and I would have gone was really becoming a big issue, you know? And I'll, uh, ask you a question here, John. I mean, what what does Microsoft s A N D. H s have in common for this last quarter? >> Um, Robin Hood? >> Yeah. That attacks a good guess. Way have in common is the fact that each one of them urged the public to patch a new vulnerability that was just released on the RTP sessions called Blue Keep. And the reason why they was so hyped about this, making sure that people get out there and patch because it was were mobile. You didn't really need tohave a user click a link or click and attachment. You know, basically, when you would actually exploit that vulnerability, it could spread like wildfire. And that's what were mobile is a great example of that is with wannacry. A couple years ago, it spread so quickly, so everybody was really focused on making sure that vulnerability actually gets patched. Adding onto that we did a little bit of research on our own and ransom Internet scans, and there's about 800,000 different devices that are vulnerable to that particular ah, new vulnerability that was announced. And, you know, I still think a lot of people haven't actually patched all of that, and that's a real big concern, especially because of the trend that we just talked about Ransomware payload. The threat actors are looking at are Rdp as the initial access into the environment. >> So on blue Keep. That's the one you were talking about, right? So what is the status of that? You said There's a lot of vulnerable is out. There are people patching it, is it Is it being moving down, the down the path in terms of our people on it? What's your take on that? What's the assessment? >> Yeah, so I think some people are starting to patch, but shoot, you know, the scans that we do, there's still a lot of unpacked systems out there, and I would also say we're not seeing what's inside the network. There may be other RTP sessions in the environment inside of an organization's environment, which really means Now, if Ransomware happens to get in there that has that capability than to be able to spread like the of some RTP vulnerability that's gonna be even a lot more difficult to be able to stop that once it's inside a network. I mean, some of the recommendations, obviously, for this one is you want to be able to patch your RTP sessions, you know, for one. Also, if you want to be able to enable network authentication, that's really gonna help us. Well, now I would also say, You know, maybe you want a hard in your user name and passwords, but if you can't do some of this stuff, at least put some mitigating controls in place. Maybe you can isolate some of those particular systems, limit the amount of AH access organizations have or their employees have to that, or maybe even just totally isolated. If it's possible, internal network segmentation is a big part of making sure you can. You're able to mitigate some of these put potential risks, or at least minimize the damage that they may cause. >> Tony G. I want to get your thoughts on your opinion and analysis expert opinion on um, the attack surface area with digital and then ultimately, what companies can do for Let's let's start with the surface area. What's your analysis there? Ah, lot of companies are recognizing. I'll see with Coyote and other digital devices. The surface area is just everywhere, right? So I got on the perimeter days. That's kind of well known. It's out there. What's the current digital surface area threats look like? What's your opinion? >> Sure, Yeah, it's Ah, now it's funny. These days, I say no, Jenna tell you everything that seems to be made as an I P address on it, which means it's actually able to access the Internet. And if they can access the Internet, the bad guys can probably reach out and touch it. And that's really the crux of the problem of these days. So anything that is being created is out on the Internet. And, yeah, like, we all know there's really not a really rigid security process to make sure that that particular device as secure is that secure as it actually needs to be Now. We talked earlier on about You know, I ot as relates to maybe home routers and how you need to be ableto hard in that because you were seeing a lot of io teapot nets that air taking over those home routers and creating these super large I ot botnets on the other side of it. You know, we've seen ah lot of skate of systems now that traditionally were in air gapped environments. Now they're being brought into the traditional network. They're being connected there. So there's an issue there, but one of the ones we haven't actually talked a lot about and we see you're starting to see the adversaries focus on these little bit more as devices in smart homes and smart buildings in this queue to threat landscape report. There was a vulnerability in one of these you motion business management systems. And, you know, we looked at all the different exploits out there, and the adversaries were actually looking at targeting that specific exploit on that. That's smart management building service device. We had about 1% of all of our exploit, uh, hits on that device. Now that might not seem like a lot, but in the grand scheme of things, when we're collecting billions and billions of events, it's a fairly substantial amount. What, now that we're Lee starts a kind of bring a whole another thought process into as a security professional as someone responds double for securing my cyber assets? What if I include in my cyber assets now widen include all the business management systems that my employees, Aaron, for my overall business. Now that that actually might be connected to my internal network, where all of my other cyber assets are. Maybe it actually should be. Maybe should be part of your vulnerability mentioned audibly patch management process. But what about all the devices in your smart home? Now? You know, all these different things are available, and you know what the trend is, John, right? I mean, the actual trend is to work from home. So you have a lot of your remote workers have, ah, great access into the environment. Now there's a great conduit for the obvious areas to be ableto break into some of those smart home devices and maybe that figure out from there there on the employees machine. And that kind of gets him into, you know, the other environment. So I would say, Start looking at maybe you don't wanna have those home devices as part of, ah, what you're responsible for protecting, but you definitely want to make sure your remote users have a hardened access into the environment. They're separated from all of those other smart, smart home devices and educate your employees on that and the user awareness training programs. Talk to them about what's happening out there, how the adversaries air starting to compromise, or at least focus on some of them smart devices in their home environment. >> These entry points are you point out, are just so pervasive. You have work at home totally right. That's a great trend that a lot of companies going to. And this is virtual first common, a world. We build this new new generation of workers. They wanna work anywhere. So no, you gotta think about all that. Those devices that your son or your daughter brought home your husband. Your wife installed a new light bulb with an I peed connection to it fully threaded processor. >> I know it. Gosh, this kind of concern me, it's safer. And what's hot these days is the webcam, right? Let's say you have an animal and you happen to go away. You always want to know what your animals doing, right? So you have these Webcams here. I bet you someone might be placing a webcam that might be near where they actually sit down and work on their computer. Someone compromises that webcam you may be. They can see some of the year's name and password that you're using a log in. Maybe they can see some information that might be sensitive on your computer. You know, it's the The options are endless here. >> Tony G. I want to get your thoughts on how companies protect themselves, because this is the real threat. A ni O t. Doesn't help either. Industrial I ot to just Internet of things, whether it's humans working at home, too, you know, sensors and light bulbs inside other factory floors or whatever means everywhere. Now the surface area is anything with a knife he address in power and connectivity. How do companies protect themselves? What's the playbook? What's coming out of Red hat? What's coming out of Fort Annette? What are you advising? What's the playbook? >> Yeah, you know I am. You know, when I get asked this question a lot, I really I sound like a broken record. Sometimes I try to find so many different ways to spin it. You know, maybe I could actually kind of say it like this, and it's always means the same thing. Work on the fundamentals and John you mentioned earlier from the very beginning. Visibility, visibility, visibility. If you can't understand all the assets that you're protecting within your environment, it's game over. From the beginning, I don't care what other whiz bang product you bring into the environment. If you're not aware of what you're actually protecting, there's just no way that you're gonna be able to understand what threats are happening out your network at a higher level. It's all about situational awareness. I want to make sure if I'm if I'm a C so I want my security operations team to have situational awareness at any given moment, all over the environment, right? So that's one thing. No grabbing that overall sort of visibility. And then once you can understand where all your assets are, what type of information's on those assets, you get a good idea of what your vulnerabilities are. You start monitoring that stuff. You can also start understanding some of different types of jabs. I know it's challenging because you've got everything in the cloud all the way down to the other end point. All these mobile devices. It's not easy, but I think if you focus on that a little bit more, it's gonna go a longer way. And I also mentioned we as humans. When something happens into the environment, we can only act so fast. And I kind of alluded to this earlier on in this interview where we need to make sure that we're leveraging automation, artificial in intelligence to help us be able to determine when threats happened. You know, it's actually be in the environment being able to determine some anomalous activity and taking action. It may not be able to re mediate, but at least it can take some initial action. The security controls can talk to each other, isolate the particular threat and let you fight to the attack, give you more time to figure out what's going on. If you can reduce the amount of time it takes you to identify the threat and isolate it, the better chances that you're gonna have to be able to minimize the overall impact of that particular Reno. >> Tony, just you jogging up a lot of memories from interviews I've had in the past. I've interviewed the four star generals, had an essay, had a cyber command. You get >> a lot of >> military kind of thinkers behind the security practice because there is a keeping eyes on the enemy on the target on the adversary kind of dialogue going on. They all talk about automation and augmenting the human piece of it, which is making sure that you have as much realty. I'm information as possible so you can keep your eyes on the targets and understand, to your point contextual awareness. This seems to be the biggest problem that Caesar's heir focused on. How to eliminate the tasks that take the eyes off the targets and keep the situational winners on on point. Your thoughts on that? >> Yeah, I have to. You know what, son I used to be? Oh, and I still do. And now I do a lot of presentations about situational awareness and being ableto build your you know, your security operations center to get that visibility. And, you know, I always start off with the question of you know, when your C so walks in and says, Hey, I saw something in the news about a specific threat. How are we able to deal with that? 95% of the responses are Well, I have to kind of go back and kind of like, you don't have to actually come dig in and, you know, see, and it takes them a while for the audio. >> So there's a classic. So let me get back to your boss. What? Patch patch? That, um Tony. Chief, Thank you so much for the insight. Great Congressional. The Holy Report. Keep up the good work. Um, quick, Quick story on black hat. What's the vibe in Vegas? Def con is right around the corner after it. Um, you seeing the security industry become much more broader? See, as the industry service area becomes from technical to business impact, you starting to see that the industry change Amazon Web service has had an event cloud security called reinforce. You starting to see a much broader scope to the industry? What's the big news coming out of black at? >> Yeah, you know, it's it's a lot of the same thing that actually kind of changes. There's just so many different vendors that are coming in with different types of security solutions, and that's awesome. That is really good with that, said, though, you know, we talked about the security shortage that we don't have a lot of security professionals with the right skill sets. What ends up happening is you know, these folks that may not have that particular skill, you know, needed. They're being placed in these higher level of security positions, and they're coming to these events and they're overwhelmed because they're all they'll have a saw slight. It's all over a similar message, but slightly different. So how did they determine which one is actually better than the others? So it's, um, I would say from that side, it gets to be a little bit kind of challenging, but at the same time, No, I mean, we continued to advance. I mean, from the, uh, no, from the actual technical controls, solutions perspective, you know, You know, we talked about it. They're going, we're getting better with automation, doing the things that the humans used to do, automating that a little bit more, letting technology do some of that mundane, everyday kind of grind activities that we would as humans would do it, take us a little bit longer. Push that off. Let the actual technology controls deal with that so that you can focus like you had mentioned before on those higher level you know, issues and also the overall sort of strategy on either howto actually not allow the officer to come in or haven't determined once they're in and how quickly will be able to get them out. >> You know, we talked. We have a panel of seashells that we talk to, and we were running a you know, surveys through them through the Cube insights Most see says, we talk Thio after they won't want to talk off the record. I don't want anyone know they work for. They all talked him. They say, Look, I'm bombarded with more and more security solutions. I'm actually trying to reduce the number of suppliers and increase the number of partners, and this is nuanced point. But to your what you're getting at is a tsunami of new things, new threats, new solutions that could be either features or platforms or tools, whatever. But most si SOS wanna build an engineering team. They wanna have full stack developers on site. They wanna have compliance team's investigative teams, situational awareness teams. And they want a partner with with suppliers where they went partners, not just suppliers. So reduce the number suppliers, increase the partners. What's your take on that year? A big partner. A lot of the biggest companies you >> get in that state spring. Yeah. I mean, that's that's actually really our whole strategy. Overall strategy for Ford. Annette is, and that's why we came up with this security fabric. We know that skills are really not as not as prevalent as that they actually need to be. And of course, you know there's not endless amounts of money as well, right? And you want to be able to get these particular security controls to talk to each other, and this is why we built this security fabric. We want to make sure that the controls that we're actually gonna build him, and we have quite a few different types of, you know, security controls that work together to give you the visibility that you're really looking for, and then years Ah, you know, trusted partner that you can actually kind of come to And we can work with you on one identifying the different types of ways the adversaries air moving into the environment and ensuring that we have security controls in place to be able to thwart the threat. Actor playbook. Making sure that we have a defensive playbook that aligns with those actual ttp is in the offensive playbook, and we can actually either detect or ultimately protect against that malicious activity. >> Tony G. Thanks for sharing your insights here on the cube conversation. We'll have to come back to you on some of these follow on conversations. Love to get your thoughts on Observe ability. Visibility on. Get into this. What kind of platforms are needed to go this next generation with cloud security and surface area being so massive? So thanks for spending the time. Appreciate it. >> Thanks a lot, Right. We only have >> a great time in Vegas. This is Cube conversation. I'm John for here in Palo Alto. Tony G with Fortinet in Las Vegas. Thanks for watching

Published Date : Aug 8 2019

SUMMARY :

from our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, Well, the Special Cube conversation. You guys have seen all the action there. So I think you know, though it is continuing to increase. Well, you know, it's always You have to know what you have to look for. In the worst cases, you don't wanna have all of your employees I mean, this increase in male wearing exploit activity you guys were pointing out clearly challenge the the one that we focused on for this quarter was called His Ego's Was Ego, Because, I mean, I can see that happening all the time. you know, a lot of folks may not actually be monitoring all the things that they need to be monitoring from, We're gonna get to that talk track in the second. is more of ah, no sort of ah, you know, more of a targeted approach. They come in and keep on hitting We've seen it kind of the the And I'll, uh, ask you a question here, John. Way have in common is the fact that each one of them What's the assessment? Yeah, so I think some people are starting to patch, but shoot, you know, the scans that we So I got on the perimeter days. I ot as relates to maybe home routers and how you need to be ableto hard in that because These entry points are you point out, are just so pervasive. You know, it's the The options Now the surface area is anything with a knife he address in power and connectivity. isolate the particular threat and let you fight to the attack, give you more time Tony, just you jogging up a lot of memories from interviews I've had in the past. I'm information as possible so you can keep your eyes on I always start off with the question of you know, when your C so walks in and says, area becomes from technical to business impact, you starting to see that the industry change Amazon not allow the officer to come in or haven't determined once they're in and how quickly will A lot of the biggest companies you of come to And we can work with you on one identifying the different We'll have to come back to you on some of Thanks a lot, Right. Tony G with Fortinet

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
TonyPERSON

0.99+

GinoPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

ChinaLOCATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

DomenicoPERSON

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

VegasLOCATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

FordORGANIZATION

0.99+

Tony G.PERSON

0.99+

AaronPERSON

0.99+

August 2019DATE

0.99+

2011DATE

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

Tony GPERSON

0.99+

Tony GiandomenicoPERSON

0.99+

95%QUANTITY

0.99+

JennaPERSON

0.99+

last quarterDATE

0.99+

CaesarPERSON

0.99+

one techniqueQUANTITY

0.99+

FortinetORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

four starQUANTITY

0.99+

about 800,000 different devicesQUANTITY

0.98+

FortiGuard LabsORGANIZATION

0.98+

about 60 plus techniquesQUANTITY

0.98+

about 1%QUANTITY

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

Robin HoodPERSON

0.97+

two pointQUANTITY

0.97+

each oneQUANTITY

0.96+

Palo Alto, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.96+

3rd 1QUANTITY

0.96+

about 4%QUANTITY

0.96+

one yearQUANTITY

0.96+

fourQUANTITY

0.96+

ThioPERSON

0.96+

Palo Alto, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.96+

OneQUANTITY

0.95+

AnnettePERSON

0.95+

Amazon WebORGANIZATION

0.95+

secondQUANTITY

0.94+

LeePERSON

0.94+

CoyoteORGANIZATION

0.94+

Threat LandscapeTITLE

0.94+

oneQUANTITY

0.94+

a yearQUANTITY

0.93+

billions andQUANTITY

0.93+

billions of eventsQUANTITY

0.93+

IranLOCATION

0.91+

one thingQUANTITY

0.91+

Ford NetsORGANIZATION

0.89+

Def ConORGANIZATION

0.88+

Black HatORGANIZATION

0.88+

doubleQUANTITY

0.86+

Number twoQUANTITY

0.84+

second interesting thingQUANTITY

0.83+

first commonQUANTITY

0.83+

4%QUANTITY

0.82+

DarcyORGANIZATION

0.78+

JORGANIZATION

0.77+

A couple years agoDATE

0.76+

Blue KeepTITLE

0.76+

coupleQUANTITY

0.75+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.73+

wildfireTITLE

0.69+

J pickORGANIZATION

0.59+

companiesQUANTITY

0.54+

PegTITLE

0.54+

CUBEConversationEVENT

0.52+

Ego's Was EgoOTHER

0.46+