Stelio D'Alo & Raveesh Chugh, Zscaler | AWS Marketplace Seller Conference 2022
(upbeat electronic music) >> Welcome back to everyone, to "theCUBE's" coverage here in Seattle, Washington for Amazon Web Services Partner Marketplace Seller Conference, combining their partner network with Marketplace forming a new organization called AWS Partner Organization. This is "theCUBE" coverage. I'm John Furrier, your host. We've got great "Cube" alumni here from Zscaler, a very successful cloud company doing great work. Stelio D'Alo, senior director of cloud business development and Raveesh Chugh, VP of Public Cloud Partnerships at Zscaler. Welcome back to "theCUBE." Good to see you guys. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you. >> Thanks having us, John. >> So we've been doing a lot of coverage of Zscaler, what a great success story. I mean, the numbers are great. The business performance, it's in the top two, three, one, two, three in all metrics on public companies, SaaS. So you guys, check. Good job. >> Yes, thank you. >> So you guys have done a good job. Now you're here, selling through the Marketplace. You guys are a world class performing company in cloud SaaS, so you're in the front lines doing well. Now, Marketplace is a procurement front end opportunity for people to buy. Hey, self-service, buy and put things together. Sounds novel, what a great concept. Great cloud life. >> Yes. >> You guys are participating and now sellers are coming together. The merger of the public, the partner network with Marketplace. It feels like this is a second act for AWS to go to the next level. They got their training wheels done with partners. Now they're going to the next level. What do you guys think about this? >> Well, I think you're right, John. I think it is very much something that is in keeping with the way AWS does business. Very Amazonian, they're working back from the customer. What we're seeing is, our customers and in general, the market is gravitating towards purchase mechanisms and route to market that just are lower friction. So in the same way that companies are going through their digital transformations now, really modernizing the way they host applications and they reach the internet. They're also modernizing on the purchasing side, which is super exciting, because we're all motivated to help customers with that agility. >> You know, it's fun to watch and again I'm being really candid and props to you guys as a company. Now, everyone else is kind of following that. Okay, lift and shift, check, doing some things. Now they go, whoa, I can really build on this. People are building their own apps for their companies. Going to build their own stuff. They're going to use piece parts. They're going to put it together in a really scalable way. That's the new normal. Okay, so now they go okay, I'm going to just buy through the market, I get purchasing power. So you guys have been a real leader with AWS. Can you share what you guys are doing in the Marketplace? I think you guys are a nice example of how to execute the Marketplace. Take us through. What are you guys offering there? What's the contract look like? Is it multi-pronged? What's the approach? What do customers get if they go to the marketplace for Zscaler? >> Yeah, so it's been a very exciting story and been a very pleasing one for us with AWS marketplace. We see a huge growth potentially. There are more than 350,000 customers that are actively buying through Marketplace today. We expect that number to grow to around a million customers by the next, I would say, five to ten years and we want to be part of this wave. We see AWS Marketplace to be a channel where not only our resalers or our channel partners can come and transact, but also our GSIs like Accenture want to transact through this channel. We are doing a lot, in terms of bringing new customers through Marketplace, who want to not only close their deals, but close it in the next few hours. That's the beauty of Marketplace, the agility, the flexibility in terms of pricing that it provides to ISVs like us. If a customer wants to delay their payments by a couple of quarters, Marketplace supports that. If a customer wants to do monthly payments, Marketplace supports that. We are seeing lot of customers, big customers, that have signed EDPs, enterprise discount plans with AWS. These are multi-year cloud commits coming to us and saying we can retire our EDPs with AWS if we transact your solution through AWS Marketplace. So what we have done, as of today, we have all of our production services enabled through AWS Marketplace. What that means for customers, they can now retire their EDPs by buying Zscaler products through AWS Marketplace and in return get the full benefit of maximizing their EDP commits with AWS. >> So you guys are fully committed, no toe on the water, as we heard. You guys are all in. >> Absolutely, that's exactly the way to put it. We're all in, all of our solutions are available in the marketplace. As you mentioned, we're a SaaS provider. So we're one of the vendors in the Marketplace that have SaaS solutions. So unlike a lot of customers and even the market in general, associate the Marketplace for historical reasons, the way it started with a lot of monthly subscriptions and just dipping your toe in it from a consumer perspective. Whereas we're doing multimillion dollar, multi-year SaaS contracts. So the most complicated kinds of transactions you'd normally associate with enterprise software, we're doing in very low friction ways. >> On the Zscaler side going in low friction. >> Yep, yeah, that's right. >> How about the customer experience? >> So it is primarily the the customer that experiences. >> Driving it? >> Yeah, they're driving it and it's because rather than traditional methods of going through paperwork, purchase orders- >> What are some of the things that customers are saying about this, bcause I see two benefits, I'll say that. The friction, it's a channel, okay, for Zscaler. Let's be clear, but now you have a customer who's got a lot of Amazon. They're a trusted partner too. So why wouldn't they want to have one point of contact to use their purchasing power and you guys are okay with that. >> We're absolutely okay with it. The reason being, we're still doing the transaction and we can do the transaction with our... We're a channel first company, so that's another important distinction of how people tend to think of the Marketplace. We go through channel. A lot of our transactions are with traditional channel partners and you'd be surprised the kinds of, even the Telcos, carrier providers, are starting to embrace Marketplace. So from a customer perspective, it's less paperwork, less legal work. >> Yeah, I'd love to get your reaction to something, because I think this highlights to me what we've been reporting on with "theCUBE" with super cloud and other trends that are different in a good way. Taking it to the next level and that is that if you look at Zscaler, SaaS, SaaS is self-service, the scale, there's efficiencies. Marketplace first started out as a self-service catalog, a website, you know, click and choose, but now it's a different. He calls it a supply chain, like the CICD pipeline of buying software. He mentions that, there's also services. He put the Channel partners can come in. The GSIs, global system integrators can come in. So it's more than just a catalog now. It's kind of self-service procurement more than it is just a catalog of buy stuff. >> Yes, so yeah, I feel CEOs, CSOs of today should understand what Marketplace brings to the bear in terms of different kinds of services or Zscaler solutions that they can acquire through Marketplace and other ISV solutions, for that matter. I feel like we are at a point, after the pandemic, where there'll be a lot of digital exploration and companies can do more in terms of not just Marketplace, but also including the channel partners as part of deals. So you talked about channel conflict. AWS addressed this by bringing a program called CPPO in the picture, Channel Partner Private Offers. What that does is, we are not only bringing all our channel partners into deals. For renewals as well, they're the partner of record and they get paid alongside with the customer. So AWS does all the heavy lifting, in terms of disbursements of payments to us, to the channel partner, so it's a win-win situation for all. >> I mean, private offers and co-sale has been very popular. >> It has been, and that is our bread and butter in the Marketplace. Again, we do primarily three year contracts and so private offers work super well. A nice thing for us as a vendor is it provides a great amount of flexibility. Private Offer gives you a lot of optionality, in terms of how the constructs of the deal and whether or not you're working with a partner, how the partner is utilizing as well to resell to the end user. So, we've always talked about AWS giving IT agility. This gives purchasing and finance business agility. >> Yeah, and I think this comes up a lot. I just noticed this happening a lot more, where you see dedicated sessions, not just on DevOps and all the goodies of the cloud, financial strategy. >> Yeah. >> Seeing a lot more conversation around how to operationalize the business transactions in the cloud. >> Absolutely. >> This is the new, I mean it's not new, it's been thrown around, but not at a tech conference. You don't see that. So I got to ask you guys, what's the message to the CISOs and executives watching the business people about Zscaler in the Marketplace? What should they be looking at? What is the pitch for Zscaler for the Marketplace buyer? >> So I would say that we are a cloud-delivered network security service. We have been in this game for more than a decade. We have years of early head start with lots of features and functionality versus our competitors. If customers were to move into AWS Cloud, they can get rid of their next-gen firewalls and just have all the traffic routed through our Zscaler internet access and use Zscaler private access for accessing their private applications. We feel we have done everything in our capacity, in terms of enabling customers through Marketplace and will continue to participate in more features and functionality that Marketplace has to offer. We would like these customers to take advantage of their EDPs as well as their retirement and spend for the multi-commit through AWS Marketplace. Learn about what we have to offer and how we can really expedite the motion for them, if they want to procure our solutions through Marketplace >> You know, we're seeing an ability for them to get more creative, more progressive in terms of the purchasing. We're also doing, we're really excited about the ability to serve multiple markets. So we've had an immense amount of success in commercial. We also are seeing increasing amount of public sector, US federal government agencies that want to procure this way as well for the same reasons. So there's a lot of innovation going on. >> So you have the FedRAMP going on, you got all those certifications. >> Exactly right. So we are the first cloud-native solution to provide IL5 ATO, as well as FedRAMP pie and we make that all available, GSA schedule pricing through the AWS Marketplace, again through FSIs and other resellers. >> Public private partnerships have been a big factor, having that span of capability. I got to ask you about, this is a cool conversation, because now you're like, okay, I'm selling through the Marketplace. Companies themselves are changing how they operate. They don't just buy software that we used to use. So general purpose, bundled stuff. Oh yeah, I'm buying this product, because this has got a great solution and I have to get forced to use this firewall, because I bought this over here. That's not how companies are architecting and developing their businesses. It's no longer buying IT. They're building their company digitally. They have to be the application. So they're not sitting around, saying hey, can I get a solution? They're building and architecting their solution. This is kind of like the new enterprise that no one's talking about. They kind of, got to do their own work. >> Yes. >> There's no general purpose solution that maps every company. So they got to pick the best piece parts and integrate them. >> Yes and I feel- >> Do you guys agree with that? >> Yeah, I agree with that and customers don't want to go for point solutions anymore. They want to go with a platform approach. They want go with a vendor that can not only cut down their vendors from multi-dozens to maybe a dozen or less and that's where, you know, we kind of have pivoted to the platform-centric approach, where we not only help customers with Cloud Network Security, but we also help customers with Cloud Native Application Protection Platform that we just recently launched. It's going by the name of the different elements, including Cloud Security Posture Management, Cloud Identity Event Management and so we are continuously doing more and more on the configuration and vulnerability side space. So if a customer has an AWS S3 bucket that is opened it can be detected and can be remediated. So all of those proactive steps we are taking, in terms of enhancing our portfolio, but we have come a long way as a company, as a platform that we have evolved in the Marketplace. >> What's the hottest product? >> The hottest product? >> In Marketplace right now. >> Well, the fastest growing products include our digital experience products and we have new Cloud Protection. So we've got Posture and Workload Protection as well and those are the fastest growing. For AWS customers a strong affinity also for ZPA, which provides you zero trust access to your workloads on AWS. So those are all the most popular in Marketplace. >> Yeah. >> So I would like to add that we recently launched and this has been a few years, a couple of years. We launched a product called Zscaler Digital X, the ZDX. >> Mm-hmm. >> What that product does is, let's say you're making a Zoom call and your WiFi network is laggy or it's a Zoom server that's laggy. It kind of detects where is the problem and it further tells the IT department you need to fix either the server on which Zoom is running, or fix your home network. So that is the beauty of the product. So I think we are seeing massive growth with some of our new editions in the portfolio, which is a long time coming. >> Yeah and certainly a lot of growth opportunities for you guys, as you come in. Where do you see Zscaler's big growth coming from product-wise? What's the big push? Actually, this is great upside for you here. >> Yeah. >> On the go to market side. Where's the big growth for Zscaler right now? So I think we are focused as a company on zero trust architecture. We want to securely connect users to apps, apps to apps, workloads to workloads and machines to machines. We want to give customers an experience where they have direct access to the apps that's hidden from the outside world and they can securely connect to the apps in a very succinct fashion. The user experience is second to none. A lot of customers use us on the Microsoft Office 365 side, where they see a lag in connecting to Microsoft Office 365 directly. They use the IE service to securely connect. >> Yeah, latency kills. >> Microsoft Office 365. >> Latency kills, as we always say, you know and security, you got to look at the pattern, you want to see that data. >> Yeah, and emerging use cases, there is an immense amount of white space and upside for us as well in emerging use cases, like OT, 5G, IOT. >> Yeah. >> Federal government, DOD. >> Oh god, tactical edge government. >> Security at the edge, absolutely, yeah. >> Where's the big edge? What's the edge challenge right now, if you have to put your finger on the edge, because right now that's the hot area, we're watching that. It's going to be highly contested. It's not yet clear, I mean certainly hybrid is the operating model, cloud, distributing, computing, but edge has got unique things that you can't really point to on premises that's the same. It's highly dynamic, you need high bandwidth, low latency, compute at the edge. The data has to be processed right there. What's the big thing at the edge right now? >> Well, so that's probably an emerging answer. I mean, we're working with our customers, they're inventing and they're kind of finding the use cases for those edge, but one of the good things about Zscaler is that we are able to, we've got low latency at the edge. We're able to work as a computer at the edge. We work on Outpost, Snowball, Snowcone, the Snow devices. So we can be wherever our customers need us. Mobile devices, there are a lot of applications where we've got to be either on embedded devices, on tractors, providing security for those IOT devices. So we're pretty comfortable with where we are being the- >> So that's why you guys are financially doing so well, performance wise. I got to ask you though, because I think that brings up the great point. If this is why I like the Marketplace, if I'm a customer, the edge is highly dynamic. It's changing all the time. I don't want to wait to buy something. If I got my solution architects on a product, I need to know I'm going to have zero trust built in and I need to push the button on Zscaler. I don't want to wait. So how does the procurement side impact? What have you guys seen? Share your thoughts on how Marketplace is working from the procurement standpoint, because it seems to me to be fast. Is that right, or is it still slow on their side? On the buyer side, because this to me would be a benefit to developers, if we say, hey, the procurement can just go really fast. I don't want to go through a bunch of PO approvals or slow meetings. >> It can be, that manifests itself in several ways, John. It can be, for instance, somebody wants to do a POC and traditionally you could take any amount of time to get budget approval, take it through. What if you had a pre-approved cloud budget and that was spent primarily through AWS Marketplace, because it's consolidated data on your AWS invoice. The ability to purchase a POC on the Marketplace could be done literally within minutes of the decision being made to go forward with it. So that's kind of a front end, you know, early stage use case. We've got examples we didn't talk about on our recent earnings call of how we have helped customers bring in their procurement with large million dollar, multimillion dollar deals. Even when a resaler's been involved, one of our resaler partners. Being able to accelerate deals, because there's so much less legal work and traditional bureaucratic effort. >> Agility. >> That agility purchasing process has allowed our customers to pull into the quarter, or the end of month, or end of quarter for them, deals that would've otherwise not been able to be done. >> So this is a great example of where you can set policy and kind of create some guard rails around innovation and integration deals, knowing if it's something that the edge is happening, say okay, here's some budget. We approved it, or Amazon gives credits and partnership going on. Then I'd say, hey, well green light this, not to exceed a million dollars, or whatever number in their range and then let people have the freedom to execute. >> You're absolutely right, so from the purchasing side, it does give them that agility. It eliminates a lot of the processes that would push out a purchase in actual execution past when the business decision is made and quite frankly, to be honest, AWS has been very accommodative. They're a great partner. They've invested a lot in Marketplace, Marketplace programs, to help customers do the right thing and do it more quickly as well as vendors like us to help our customers make the decisions they need to. >> Rising tide, a rising tide floats all boats and you guys are a great example of an independent company. Highly successful on your own. >> Yep. >> Certainly the numbers are clear. Wall Street loves Zscaler and economics are great. >> Our customer CSAT numbers are off the scale as well. >> Customers are great and now you've got the Marketplace. This is again, a new normal. A new kind of ecosystem is developing where it's not like the old monolithic ecosystems. The value creation and extraction is happening differently now. It's kind of interesting. >> Yes and I feel we have a long way to go, but what I can tell you is that Zscaler is in this for the long run. We are seeing some of the competitors erupt in the space as well, but they have a long way to go. What we have built requires years worth of R&D and features and thousands of customer's use cases which kind of lead to something what Zscaler has come up with today. What we have is very unique and is going to continuously be an innovation in the market in the years to come. In terms of being more cloud-savvy or more cloud-focused or more cloud-native than what the market has seen so far in the form of next-gen firewalls. >> I know you guys have got a lot of AI work. We've had many conversations with Howie over there. Great stuff and really appreciate you guys participating in our super cloud event we had and we'll see more of that where we're talking about the next generation clouds, really enabling that new disruptive, open-spanning capabilities across multiple environments to run cloud-native modern applications at scale and secure. Appreciate your time to come on "theCUBE". >> Thank you. >> Thank you very much. >> Thanks for having us. >> Thanks, I totally appreciate it. Zscaler, leading company here on "theCUBE" talking about their relationship with Marketplace as they continue to grow and succeed as technology goes to the next level in the cloud. Of course "theCUBE's" covering it here in Seattle. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (peaceful electronic music)
SUMMARY :
Good to see you guys. I mean, the numbers are great. So you guys have done a good job. The merger of the public, So in the same way that companies and props to you guys as a company. and in return get the full benefit So you guys are fully committed, and even the market in general, On the Zscaler side So it is primarily the the customer What are some of the things and we can do the transaction with our... and that is that if you So AWS does all the heavy lifting, I mean, private offers and in terms of how the constructs of the deal the goodies of the cloud, in the cloud. So I got to ask you guys, and just have all the traffic routed in terms of the purchasing. So you have the FedRAMP going on, and we make that all available, This is kind of like the new enterprise So they got to pick the best evolved in the Marketplace. Well, the fastest growing products Zscaler Digital X, the ZDX. So that is the beauty of the product. What's the big push? On the go to market side. and security, you got Yeah, and emerging use cases, on premises that's the same. but one of the good things about Zscaler and I need to push the button on Zscaler. of the decision being made or the end of month, or the freedom to execute. It eliminates a lot of the processes and you guys are a great example Certainly the numbers are clear. are off the scale as well. It's kind of interesting. and is going to continuously the next generation clouds, next level in the cloud.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Raveesh Chugh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stelio D'Alo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Seattle | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
more than 350,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS Partner Organization | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two benefits | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Seattle, Washington | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
million dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ten years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second act | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first company | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
IE | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
around a million customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
multimillion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
a dozen | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Public Cloud Partnerships | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
more than a decade | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Marketplace | TITLE | 0.95+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Cloud Network Security | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Marketplace | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
AWS Marketplace | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Cloud Identity Event Management | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.89+ |
SaaS | TITLE | 0.88+ |
FedRAMP | TITLE | 0.88+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
thousands of customer | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
S3 | TITLE | 0.86+ |
8 Stelio D'Alo & Raveesh Chugh, Zscaler | AWS Marketplace Seller Conference 2022
(upbeat electronic music) >> Welcome back to everyone, to "theCUBE's" coverage here in Seattle, Washington for Amazon Web Services Partner Marketplace Seller Conference, combining their partner network with Marketplace forming a new organization called AWS Partner Organization. This is "theCUBE" coverage. I'm John Furrier, your host. We've got great "Cube" alumni here from Zscaler, a very successful cloud company doing great work. Stelio D'Alo, senior director of cloud business development and Raveesh Chugh, VP of Public Cloud Partnerships at Zscaler. Welcome back to "theCUBE." Good to see you guys. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you. >> Thanks having us, John. >> So we've been doing a lot of coverage of Zscaler, what a great success story. I mean, the numbers are great. The business performance, it's in the top two, three, one, two, three in all metrics on public companies, SaaS. So you guys, check. Good job. >> Yes, thank you. >> So you guys have done a good job. Now you're here, selling through the Marketplace. You guys are a world class performing company in cloud SaaS, so you're in the front lines doing well. Now, Marketplace is a procurement front end opportunity for people to buy. Hey, self-service, buy and put things together. Sounds novel, what a great concept. Great cloud life. >> Yes. >> You guys are participating and now sellers are coming together. The merger of the public, the partner network with Marketplace. It feels like this is a second act for AWS to go to the next level. They got their training wheels done with partners. Now they're going to the next level. What do you guys think about this? >> Well, I think you're right, John. I think it is very much something that is in keeping with the way AWS does business. Very Amazonian, they're working back from the customer. What we're seeing is, our customers and in general, the market is gravitating towards purchase mechanisms and route to market that just are lower friction. So in the same way that companies are going through their digital transformations now, really modernizing the way they host applications and they reach the internet. They're also modernizing on the purchasing side, which is super exciting, because we're all motivated to help customers with that agility. >> You know, it's fun to watch and again I'm being really candid and props to you guys as a company. Now, everyone else is kind of following that. Okay, lift and shift, check, doing some things. Now they go, whoa, I can really build on this. People are building their own apps for their companies. Going to build their own stuff. They're going to use piece parts. They're going to put it together in a really scalable way. That's the new normal. Okay, so now they go okay, I'm going to just buy through the market, I get purchasing power. So you guys have been a real leader with AWS. Can you share what you guys are doing in the Marketplace? I think you guys are a nice example of how to execute the Marketplace. Take us through. What are you guys offering there? What's the contract look like? Is it multi-pronged? What's the approach? What do customers get if they go to the marketplace for Zscaler? >> Yeah, so it's been a very exciting story and been a very pleasing one for us with AWS marketplace. We see a huge growth potentially. There are more than 350,000 customers that are actively buying through Marketplace today. We expect that number to grow to around a million customers by the next, I would say, five to ten years and we want to be part of this wave. We see AWS Marketplace to be a channel where not only our resalers or our channel partners can come and transact, but also our GSIs like Accenture want to transact through this channel. We are doing a lot, in terms of bringing new customers through Marketplace, who want to not only close their deals, but close it in the next few hours. That's the beauty of Marketplace, the agility, the flexibility in terms of pricing that it provides to ISVs like us. If a customer wants to delay their payments by a couple of quarters, Marketplace supports that. If a customer wants to do monthly payments, Marketplace supports that. We are seeing lot of customers, big customers, that have signed EDPs, enterprise discount plans with AWS. These are multi-year cloud commits coming to us and saying we can retire our EDPs with AWS if we transact your solution through AWS Marketplace. So what we have done, as of today, we have all of our production services enabled through AWS Marketplace. What that means for customers, they can now retire their EDPs by buying Zscaler products through AWS Marketplace and in return get the full benefit of maximizing their EDP commits with AWS. >> So you guys are fully committed, no toe on the water, as we heard. You guys are all in. >> Absolutely, that's exactly the way to put it. We're all in, all of our solutions are available in the marketplace. As you mentioned, we're a SaaS provider. So we're one of the vendors in the Marketplace that have SaaS solutions. So unlike a lot of customers and even the market in general, associate the Marketplace for historical reasons, the way it started with a lot of monthly subscriptions and just dipping your toe in it from a consumer perspective. Whereas we're doing multimillion dollar, multi-year SaaS contracts. So the most complicated kinds of transactions you'd normally associate with enterprise software, we're doing in very low friction ways. >> On the Zscaler side going in low friction. >> Yep, yeah, that's right. >> How about the customer experience? >> So it is primarily the the customer that experiences. >> Driving it? >> Yeah, they're driving it and it's because rather than traditional methods of going through paperwork, purchase orders- >> What are some of the things that customers are saying about this, bcause I see two benefits, I'll say that. The friction, it's a channel, okay, for Zscaler. Let's be clear, but now you have a customer who's got a lot of Amazon. They're a trusted partner too. So why wouldn't they want to have one point of contact to use their purchasing power and you guys are okay with that. >> We're absolutely okay with it. The reason being, we're still doing the transaction and we can do the transaction with our... We're a channel first company, so that's another important distinction of how people tend to think of the Marketplace. We go through channel. A lot of our transactions are with traditional channel partners and you'd be surprised the kinds of, even the Telcos, carrier providers, are starting to embrace Marketplace. So from a customer perspective, it's less paperwork, less legal work. >> Yeah, I'd love to get your reaction to something, because I think this highlights to me what we've been reporting on with "theCUBE" with super cloud and other trends that are different in a good way. Taking it to the next level and that is that if you look at Zscaler, SaaS, SaaS is self-service, the scale, there's efficiencies. Marketplace first started out as a self-service catalog, a website, you know, click and choose, but now it's a different. He calls it a supply chain, like the CICD pipeline of buying software. He mentions that, there's also services. He put the Channel partners can come in. The GSIs, global system integrators can come in. So it's more than just a catalog now. It's kind of self-service procurement more than it is just a catalog of buy stuff. >> Yes, so yeah, I feel CEOs, CSOs of today should understand what Marketplace brings to the bear in terms of different kinds of services or Zscaler solutions that they can acquire through Marketplace and other ISV solutions, for that matter. I feel like we are at a point, after the pandemic, where there'll be a lot of digital exploration and companies can do more in terms of not just Marketplace, but also including the channel partners as part of deals. So you talked about channel conflict. AWS addressed this by bringing a program called CPPO in the picture, Channel Partner Private Offers. What that does is, we are not only bringing all our channel partners into deals. For renewals as well, they're the partner of record and they get paid alongside with the customer. So AWS does all the heavy lifting, in terms of disbursements of payments to us, to the channel partner, so it's a win-win situation for all. >> I mean, private offers and co-sale has been very popular. >> It has been, and that is our bread and butter in the Marketplace. Again, we do primarily three year contracts and so private offers work super well. A nice thing for us as a vendor is it provides a great amount of flexibility. Private Offer gives you a lot of optionality, in terms of how the constructs of the deal and whether or not you're working with a partner, how the partner is utilizing as well to resell to the end user. So, we've always talked about AWS giving IT agility. This gives purchasing and finance business agility. >> Yeah, and I think this comes up a lot. I just noticed this happening a lot more, where you see dedicated sessions, not just on DevOps and all the goodies of the cloud, financial strategy. >> Yeah. >> Seeing a lot more conversation around how to operationalize the business transactions in the cloud. >> Absolutely. >> This is the new, I mean it's not new, it's been thrown around, but not at a tech conference. You don't see that. So I got to ask you guys, what's the message to the CISOs and executives watching the business people about Zscaler in the Marketplace? What should they be looking at? What is the pitch for Zscaler for the Marketplace buyer? >> So I would say that we are a cloud-delivered network security service. We have been in this game for more than a decade. We have years of early head start with lots of features and functionality versus our competitors. If customers were to move into AWS Cloud, they can get rid of their next-gen firewalls and just have all the traffic routed through our Zscaler internet access and use Zscaler private access for accessing their private applications. We feel we have done everything in our capacity, in terms of enabling customers through Marketplace and will continue to participate in more features and functionality that Marketplace has to offer. We would like these customers to take advantage of their EDPs as well as their retirement and spend for the multi-commit through AWS Marketplace. Learn about what we have to offer and how we can really expedite the motion for them, if they want to procure our solutions through Marketplace >> You know, we're seeing an ability for them to get more creative, more progressive in terms of the purchasing. We're also doing, we're really excited about the ability to serve multiple markets. So we've had an immense amount of success in commercial. We also are seeing increasing amount of public sector, US federal government agencies that want to procure this way as well for the same reasons. So there's a lot of innovation going on. >> So you have the FedRAMP going on, you got all those certifications. >> Exactly right. So we are the first cloud-native solution to provide IL5 ATO, as well as FedRAMP pie and we make that all available, GSA schedule pricing through the AWS Marketplace, again through FSIs and other resellers. >> Public private partnerships have been a big factor, having that span of capability. I got to ask you about, this is a cool conversation, because now you're like, okay, I'm selling through the Marketplace. Companies themselves are changing how they operate. They don't just buy software that we used to use. So general purpose, bundled stuff. Oh yeah, I'm buying this product, because this has got a great solution and I have to get forced to use this firewall, because I bought this over here. That's not how companies are architecting and developing their businesses. It's no longer buying IT. They're building their company digitally. They have to be the application. So they're not sitting around, saying hey, can I get a solution? They're building and architecting their solution. This is kind of like the new enterprise that no one's talking about. They kind of, got to do their own work. >> Yes. >> There's no general purpose solution that maps every company. So they got to pick the best piece parts and integrate them. >> Yes and I feel- >> Do you guys agree with that? >> Yeah, I agree with that and customers don't want to go for point solutions anymore. They want to go with a platform approach. They want go with a vendor that can not only cut down their vendors from multi-dozens to maybe a dozen or less and that's where, you know, we kind of have pivoted to the platform-centric approach, where we not only help customers with Cloud Network Security, but we also help customers with Cloud Native Application Protection Platform that we just recently launched. It's going by the name of the different elements, including Cloud Security Posture Management, Cloud Identity Event Management and so we are continuously doing more and more on the configuration and vulnerability side space. So if a customer has an AWS S3 bucket that is opened it can be detected and can be remediated. So all of those proactive steps we are taking, in terms of enhancing our portfolio, but we have come a long way as a company, as a platform that we have evolved in the Marketplace. >> What's the hottest product? >> The hottest product? >> In Marketplace right now. >> Well, the fastest growing products include our digital experience products and we have new Cloud Protection. So we've got Posture and Workload Protection as well and those are the fastest growing. For AWS customers a strong affinity also for ZPA, which provides you zero trust access to your workloads on AWS. So those are all the most popular in Marketplace. >> Yeah. >> So I would like to add that we recently launched and this has been a few years, a couple of years. We launched a product called Zscaler Digital X, the ZDX. >> Mm-hmm. >> What that product does is, let's say you're making a Zoom call and your WiFi network is laggy or it's a Zoom server that's laggy. It kind of detects where is the problem and it further tells the IT department you need to fix either the server on which Zoom is running, or fix your home network. So that is the beauty of the product. So I think we are seeing massive growth with some of our new editions in the portfolio, which is a long time coming. >> Yeah and certainly a lot of growth opportunities for you guys, as you come in. Where do you see Zscaler's big growth coming from product-wise? What's the big push? Actually, this is great upside for you here. >> Yeah. >> On the go to market side. Where's the big growth for Zscaler right now? So I think we are focused as a company on zero trust architecture. We want to securely connect users to apps, apps to apps, workloads to workloads and machines to machines. We want to give customers an experience where they have direct access to the apps that's hidden from the outside world and they can securely connect to the apps in a very succinct fashion. The user experience is second to none. A lot of customers use us on the Microsoft Office 365 side, where they see a lag in connecting to Microsoft Office 365 directly. They use the IE service to securely connect. >> Yeah, latency kills. >> Microsoft Office 365. >> Latency kills, as we always say, you know and security, you got to look at the pattern, you want to see that data. >> Yeah, and emerging use cases, there is an immense amount of white space and upside for us as well in emerging use cases, like OT, 5G, IOT. >> Yeah. >> Federal government, DOD. >> Oh god, tactical edge government. >> Security at the edge, absolutely, yeah. >> Where's the big edge? What's the edge challenge right now, if you have to put your finger on the edge, because right now that's the hot area, we're watching that. It's going to be highly contested. It's not yet clear, I mean certainly hybrid is the operating model, cloud, distributing, computing, but edge has got unique things that you can't really point to on premises that's the same. It's highly dynamic, you need high bandwidth, low latency, compute at the edge. The data has to be processed right there. What's the big thing at the edge right now? >> Well, so that's probably an emerging answer. I mean, we're working with our customers, they're inventing and they're kind of finding the use cases for those edge, but one of the good things about Zscaler is that we are able to, we've got low latency at the edge. We're able to work as a computer at the edge. We work on Outpost, Snowball, Snowcone, the Snow devices. So we can be wherever our customers need us. Mobile devices, there are a lot of applications where we've got to be either on embedded devices, on tractors, providing security for those IOT devices. So we're pretty comfortable with where we are being the- >> So that's why you guys are financially doing so well, performance wise. I got to ask you though, because I think that brings up the great point. If this is why I like the Marketplace, if I'm a customer, the edge is highly dynamic. It's changing all the time. I don't want to wait to buy something. If I got my solution architects on a product, I need to know I'm going to have zero trust built in and I need to push the button on Zscaler. I don't want to wait. So how does the procurement side impact? What have you guys seen? Share your thoughts on how Marketplace is working from the procurement standpoint, because it seems to me to be fast. Is that right, or is it still slow on their side? On the buyer side, because this to me would be a benefit to developers, if we say, hey, the procurement can just go really fast. I don't want to go through a bunch of PO approvals or slow meetings. >> It can be, that manifests itself in several ways, John. It can be, for instance, somebody wants to do a POC and traditionally you could take any amount of time to get budget approval, take it through. What if you had a pre-approved cloud budget and that was spent primarily through AWS Marketplace, because it's consolidated data on your AWS invoice. The ability to purchase a POC on the Marketplace could be done literally within minutes of the decision being made to go forward with it. So that's kind of a front end, you know, early stage use case. We've got examples we didn't talk about on our recent earnings call of how we have helped customers bring in their procurement with large million dollar, multimillion dollar deals. Even when a resaler's been involved, one of our resaler partners. Being able to accelerate deals, because there's so much less legal work and traditional bureaucratic effort. >> Agility. >> That agility purchasing process has allowed our customers to pull into the quarter, or the end of month, or end of quarter for them, deals that would've otherwise not been able to be done. >> So this is a great example of where you can set policy and kind of create some guard rails around innovation and integration deals, knowing if it's something that the edge is happening, say okay, here's some budget. We approved it, or Amazon gives credits and partnership going on. Then I'd say, hey, well green light this, not to exceed a million dollars, or whatever number in their range and then let people have the freedom to execute. >> You're absolutely right, so from the purchasing side, it does give them that agility. It eliminates a lot of the processes that would push out a purchase in actual execution past when the business decision is made and quite frankly, to be honest, AWS has been very accommodative. They're a great partner. They've invested a lot in Marketplace, Marketplace programs, to help customers do the right thing and do it more quickly as well as vendors like us to help our customers make the decisions they need to. >> Rising tide, a rising tide floats all boats and you guys are a great example of an independent company. Highly successful on your own. >> Yep. >> Certainly the numbers are clear. Wall Street loves Zscaler and economics are great. >> Our customer CSAT numbers are off the scale as well. >> Customers are great and now you've got the Marketplace. This is again, a new normal. A new kind of ecosystem is developing where it's not like the old monolithic ecosystems. The value creation and extraction is happening differently now. It's kind of interesting. >> Yes and I feel we have a long way to go, but what I can tell you is that Zscaler is in this for the long run. We are seeing some of the competitors erupt in the space as well, but they have a long way to go. What we have built requires years worth of R&D and features and thousands of customer's use cases which kind of lead to something what Zscaler has come up with today. What we have is very unique and is going to continuously be an innovation in the market in the years to come. In terms of being more cloud-savvy or more cloud-focused or more cloud-native than what the market has seen so far in the form of next-gen firewalls. >> I know you guys have got a lot of AI work. We've had many conversations with Howie over there. Great stuff and really appreciate you guys participating in our super cloud event we had and we'll see more of that where we're talking about the next generation clouds, really enabling that new disruptive, open-spanning capabilities across multiple environments to run cloud-native modern applications at scale and secure. Appreciate your time to come on "theCUBE". >> Thank you. >> Thank you very much. >> Thanks for having us. >> Thanks, I totally appreciate it. Zscaler, leading company here on "theCUBE" talking about their relationship with Marketplace as they continue to grow and succeed as technology goes to the next level in the cloud. Of course "theCUBE's" covering it here in Seattle. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (peaceful electronic music)
SUMMARY :
Good to see you guys. I mean, the numbers are great. So you guys have done a good job. The merger of the public, So in the same way that companies and props to you guys as a company. and in return get the full benefit So you guys are fully committed, and even the market in general, On the Zscaler side So it is primarily the the customer What are some of the things and we can do the transaction with our... and that is that if you So AWS does all the heavy lifting, I mean, private offers and in terms of how the constructs of the deal the goodies of the cloud, in the cloud. So I got to ask you guys, and just have all the traffic routed in terms of the purchasing. So you have the FedRAMP going on, and we make that all available, This is kind of like the new enterprise So they got to pick the best evolved in the Marketplace. Well, the fastest growing products Zscaler Digital X, the ZDX. So that is the beauty of the product. What's the big push? On the go to market side. and security, you got Yeah, and emerging use cases, on premises that's the same. but one of the good things about Zscaler and I need to push the button on Zscaler. of the decision being made or the end of month, or the freedom to execute. It eliminates a lot of the processes and you guys are a great example Certainly the numbers are clear. are off the scale as well. It's kind of interesting. and is going to continuously the next generation clouds, next level in the cloud.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Raveesh Chugh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stelio D'Alo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Seattle | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
more than 350,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS Partner Organization | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two benefits | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Seattle, Washington | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
million dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ten years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second act | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first company | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
IE | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
around a million customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
multimillion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
a dozen | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Public Cloud Partnerships | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
more than a decade | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Marketplace | TITLE | 0.95+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Cloud Network Security | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Marketplace | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
AWS Marketplace | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Cloud Identity Event Management | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.89+ |
SaaS | TITLE | 0.88+ |
FedRAMP | TITLE | 0.88+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
thousands of customer | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
S3 | TITLE | 0.86+ |
Howie Xu, Zscaler | Supercloud22
(upbeat music) >> Welcome back to Supercloud 22. I'm John Furrier, your host of "The Cube." We're here for a live performance in studio bringing all the thought leaders around this concept of Supercloud, which is a consortium of the smartest people in the industry, the the Cloudaratti some say, or just people in the field building out next generation Cloud technologies for businesses, for the industry, you know, software meets infrastructure at scale and platforms. All great stuff. We have an expert here, Cube alumni and friend of ours, Howie Xu, VP of machine learning and AI at Zscaler, hugely successful company, platform, whatever you want to call it. They're definitely super clouding in their own. Howie, great to see you. Thanks for spending time with us to unpack and grock the direction of the industry that we see. We call it Supercloud. >> Hey, John, great to be back. I'm expecting a nice very educational and interesting conversation here again. >> Yeah, well, you know, one of the things I love talking with you about is you're deep on the technology side, as well as you got the historian view like we do. We've seen the movies before, we've seen the patterns, and now we're seeing structural change that has happened, that's cloud. Thank you very much, AWS. And as your GCP and others. Now we're seeing structural change happening in real time and we want to talk about it as it's happening. This is the purpose of this event. And that is that Cloud is one. Okay, great Cloud operations, on premises and Edge are emerging. Software is open source. It's the perfect storm for innovation and new things are emerging. You're seeing companies like Snowflake, and Databricks, and Zscaler all building great products. But now it's not one thing anymore. It's a lot of things going on. So what is your take on Supercloud? How do you see this evolving? What is some of the structural change that's happening in your mind? >> Yeah, so when you first reached out a few weeks ago about this event, I was like, "Hey, what is Supercloud." I know you tweeted a little bit here and there, but I never really, you know, double clicked, right. So I actually listened to some of your episodes you know, the previous conversations. You know, I would say the way you define Supercloud is it's not just the multi-cloud. The multi-Cloud is probably one aspect of it, right. You know, it's actually more beyond that, right. You know, a little bit, you know, towards past, a little bit more towards the flexibility, and then, you know, including, and also you want to include the on-prem, the edge, not just the Big 3 cloud, right. So there is a lot of the, let's say hybrid, more inclusive, right. So, the way I look at it is it's now very different from my imagination of where the Cloud would be, should be 10, 12 years ago. Because, you know, at that time it was, you know, on-prem dominant and then we say, hey, let's go cloud. I never for a second thought, you know, we would've ditch the on-prem completely, right. You know, on-prem has its own value. It's own kind of characteristics we wanted to keep, right. But the way we went for the last 10 years is, hey, Cloud, Cloud everywhere. We embrace Cloud. You know, the way I look at architecture is always very much like a pendulum, right? We swung from decentralized in the mainframe days, you know back in the days, to more distributed, right, PC, kind of a architecture, you know, servers in your own data center. And then to the now, the Cloud, the Big 3 Cloud in particular, right. I think in the next 10, 15, 20 years, it will swing back to more decentralized, more distributed architecture again. Every time you have a swing, because there is some fundamental reason behind that, we all knew the reason behind the current swing to the Cloud. It's because hey, the on-prem data center was too complex, right. You know, too expensive, right. You know, it would've take at least the six months to get any business application going, right. So compared to Cloud, a swipe a credit card, frictionless, you know, pay as you go, it's so great. But I think we are going to see more and more reason for people to say, "Hey, I need a architecture the other way around because of the decentralized the use case," right. Web3 is one example. Even though Web3 is still, you know, emerging right, very, very early days. But that could be one reason, right? You mentioned the Zscaler is kind of a Supercloud of its own, right? We always embrace public Cloud, but a lot of the workloads is actually on our own, you know, within our own data center. We take advantage of the elasticity of the public Cloud, right. But we also get a value, get a performance of our private Cloud. So I want to say a company like Zscaler taking advantage of the Supercloud already, but there will be more and more use cases taking advantage. >> And the use cases are key. Let me just go back and share something we had on the panel earlier in the day, the Cloudaratti Panel. Back in 2008, a bunch of us were getting together and we kind of were riffing, oh yeah, the future's going to be web services and Clouds will talk to each other, workloads can work across this (indistinct) abstraction layer, APIs is going to be talking to each other. A little bit early but we tried to think about it in terms of the preferred architecture. Okay, way too early. Yeah. AWS was just getting going, really kind of pumping on all cylinders there, getting that trajectory up. But it was use case driven. The nirvana never happened. I mean, we were talking Supercloud back then with the Cloudaratti group and we were thinking, okay, hey this is cool. But it was just an evolutionary thing. So I want to get your reaction. Today, the use cases are different. It's not just developers deploying on public Cloud to get all those greatness and goodness of the Cloud, to your point about Zscaler and others, there's on premises use cases and edge use cases emerging. 5g is right there. That's going to explode. So, the use cases now are all Cloud based. Again, this is an input into what we're seeing around Supercloud. How do you see that? What's your reaction to that? And how do you see that evolving so that the methodologies and all the taxonomies are in place for the right solution? >> Right, I mean, you know, some of the use cases are already here, you know, have been here for the last few years. And again, I mentioned a Zscaler, right. The reason that a Zscaler needs the on-prem version of it is because it's impossible to route all the traffic to the Big 3 Cloud, because they're still far away. Sometimes you need the presence much closer to you in order for you to get the level of the performance latency you want, right. So that's why Zscaler has, you know, so many data center of our own instead of leveraging the public Cloud, you know, for most part. However, public Cloud is still super important for Zscaler. I can tell you a story, right. You know, two years ago, you know, at the beginning of the pandemics, everyone started working from home suddenly, right. You are talking about Fortune 500 companies with 200,000 employees, suddenly having 200,000 employees working from home. Their VPN architecture is not going to support that kind of the workload, right? Even Zscaler's own architecture or the presence is not enough. So overnight we just, having so many new workloads, to support this work from home, the zero trust network for our customers, literally overnight. So it wouldn't have happened without public Cloud. So we took advantage of the public Cloud. Yet at the same time, for many, many use cases that Zscaler is paying attention to in terms of the zero trust architecture, the latency, the latency guarantee aspect, the cost is so important. So we kind of take it advantage of both. >> Yeah, definitely. >> Today you may say, hey, you know, Zscaler is one of the, not a majority of the companies in terms of the Cloud adoption or public Cloud adoption, right. But I can say that, yeah, that's because it's more infrastructure, security infrastructure. It's a little bit different for some of the communication applications, right. Why not just support everything on the public Cloud? That's doable today. However, moving forward next to 5, 10, 15 years, we expect to see Web3 kind of the use cases to grow more and more. In those kind of decentralized use cases, I can totally see that we, you know, the on-prim presence is very important. >> Yeah. One of the things we're seeing with Supercloud that we're kind of seeing clarity on is that there's a lot of seamless execution around, less friction around areas that require a PhD or hard work. And you're seeing specialty Superclouds, apps, identity data security. You're also seeing vertical clouds, Goldman Sachs doing financial applications. I'm sure there'll be some insurance. People in these verse. Building on top of the CapEx on one Cloud really fast and moving to others. So that's clearly a trend. The interesting thing I want to get your thoughts on, Howie, on an architectural basis is in Cloud, public Cloud generally, SaaS depends on IAS. So there's an interplay between SaaS and the infrastructures of service and pass as well. But SaaS and IAS, they solve a lot of the problems. You mentioned latency. How do you see the interplay of these Superclouds that utilize the SaaS IS relationship to solve technical problems? So in architecturally, that's been a tight integration on these Clouds, but now as you get more complexity with Supercloud, how do you see SaaS applications changing? >> Yeah, I view the Supercloud is actually reduced the complexity. The reason I'm saying that is, think about it in the world where you have predominantly public Cloud kind of the architecture, right? 10 years ago, AWS has probably 20 services. Now they probably have, you know, more than 1,000 services. Same thing with Azure, same thing with GCP. I mean, who can make sense out of it, right. You know, if you just consume the eyes or the Big 3 Cloud service as is. You know, you need a PhD these days to make sense all of them. So the way I think about Supercloud or where, you know it is going, is it has to provide more simplicity, a better way for people to make sense out of it, right. Cause if I'm an architecture and I have to think, hey, this is a public Cloud, this is a multi-Cloud, and by the way, certain things need to be run on the on-prem. And how do I deal with the uniform nature of it? My mind would blow up. So I need a higher level abstraction. That higher level abstraction will hide the complexity of the where it is, which vendor. It will only tell me the service level, right. You know, we always say, you know, the Cloud is like electricity. I only wanted to know is that like 110 volt or 220, 240, whatever that is. I don't really want to know more than that, right. So I want to say a key requirement for the Supercloud is it's reduced the complexity, higher level abstraction. It has to be like that. >> And operational consistencies at the bottom. Howie, we have one minute left. I want to get your thoughts. I'd like you to share what you're working on that you're excited about. It doesn't have to be with Zscaler. As you see the Supercloud trend emerging, this is the next generation Cloud, Cloud 2.0, whatever we want to call it, it's happening. It's changing. It's getting better. What are you excited about? What do you see as really key inflection point variables in this big wave? >> Yeah. One of the things I really like, what I heard from you in the past about Supercloud is a Supercloud is not just a one Cloud or one vendor. It's almost like every company should have its own Supercloud, right. You're talking about JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs of the world, that they need to have their own Supercloud. Zscaler and their security vendors, they may have their own Cloud. So I think every Fortune 500, Fortune 2,000 companies will have its own Supercloud. So I'm excited about that. So why that's important? We also say that, you know, in the next 10, 20 years, AI machine learning is going to help us a lot, right. So without Supercloud, it's very hard to do AI machine learning. 'Cause if you don't have a place that you know where the data is, and then it's pretty hard. And in the context of Supercloud, I totally foresee that the AI model will follow the data. If the data is in the cloud, it will go there. If the data is on-prem, it will go there. And then the Supercloud will hide the complexity of it. So if you ask me, my passion is leveraging AI machine learning to change the world, but Supercloud will make that easier, right. If you think about why Google, Facebook of the world, are able to leverage AI better than 99% of the rest of the world, because they figure out the Supercloud for themselves, right. And I think now it's the time for the rest of the Fortune 500, of Fortune 2,000 company to figure out its own Supercloud strategy. What is my Supercloud? I need to have my own Supercloud. Each company needs to have its own Supercloud. That's how I see it. >> Howie, always great to have you on. Thanks so much for spending the time and weighing in on this really important topic. We're going to be opening this up. It's not over. We're going to continue to watch the change as it unfolds and get an open community perspective. Thank you so much for being a great expert in our network and community. We really appreciate your time. >> Thank you for having me. >> Okay. Okay, that's it. We'll be up with more coverage here, Supercloud event, after this short break. I'm John Furrier, host of "The Cube." Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and grock the direction of Hey, John, great to be back. This is the purpose of this event. the current swing to the Cloud. and goodness of the Cloud, instead of leveraging the public Cloud, kind of the use cases and the infrastructures of You know, we always say, you know, consistencies at the bottom. of the rest of the world, Howie, always great to have you on. I'm John Furrier, host of "The Cube."
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2008 | DATE | 0.99+ |
200,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Howie Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Goldman Sachs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
200,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
110 volt | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Howie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
more than 1,000 services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
220 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Supercloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IAS | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
JP Morgan | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Supercloud | TITLE | 0.99+ |
240 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one minute | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
99% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
10 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Each company | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second thought | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one reason | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
SaaS | TITLE | 0.96+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
5 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
The Cube | TITLE | 0.96+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.95+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Cloudaratti | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Big 3 | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
one vendor | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Cloud 2.0 | TITLE | 0.94+ |
one aspect | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
today | DATE | 0.93+ |
Supercloud 22 | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.91+ |
Howie | TITLE | 0.91+ |
Zscaler | PERSON | 0.9+ |
few weeks ago | DATE | 0.9+ |
Superclouds | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
companies | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Supercloud | EVENT | 0.86+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
12 years ago | DATE | 0.83+ |
pandemics | EVENT | 0.82+ |
Stephen Kovac, Zscaler | AWS re:Invent 2021
(upbeat music) >> Good evening, guys. Welcome back to Las Vegas, theCUBE is here live at AWS re:Invent 2021. I'm Lisa Martin. We have two live sets, two remote sets, over 100 guests on theCUBE talking with AWS, and its massive ecosystem of partners bringing you this hybrid tech event, probably the biggest of the year, and I'm pleased to welcome Stephen Kovac next, the Chief Compliance Officer at Zscaler. Stephen, how's it going? >> Well, it's going well, Lisa. Thank you for asking, enjoying Vegas, loving the conference, unbelievable. >> Isn't it great to be back in person? >> Oh, it's so great, I've seen people. >> Conversations you can't replicate on video conferencing, you just can't. >> Can't, and you see people you haven't seen in two years, and it's like all of a sudden you're best buddies again. It's just wonderful, it's so great to back. >> It is, and AWS in typical fashion has done a great job of getting everybody in here safely. I'm not at all surprised, that's what I expected, but it's been great. And I hope that this can demonstrate to other companies, you can do this safely. >> You can, I think so. I mean, there's a lot of effort going into this, but as usual AWS does it right. So, you expect that. >> They do. Talk to me about the Zscaler-AWS partnership. What's going on? >> Well, it's a great partnership. So AWS and Zscaler have been partners since the beginning of Zscaler. We are the largest security cloud in the world. We're born and bred in the cloud security company. So literally we wrote one application that does global security, everything from firewall to proxy, secure web gateway, to DLP, to all this in one piece of software. So, in the past where people would buy appliances for all these devices and put them in their own data center, we wrote a software that allows us to put that in the cloud, run it on the cloud globally around the world. And our partnership with AWS is, we originally built that on AWS, and today still AWS is our prime partner, especially in the zero trust side of our business. So, great relationship, long-term and great I think for both of us, it's been a very, very... >> Fruitful partnership, synergistic? >> Synergistic, love that, so yes. >> You mentioned zero trust, and we have seen such massive changes to the security and the threat landscape the last 20, 22 months. Talk to me about the recent executive order calling for zero trust, how does Zscaler's partnership with AWS help you enable organizations, fed, SLED, DoD, to be able to actually bring in and apply zero trust? >> Yeah, great question. Five years ago I was tasked to bring Zscaler into the government side of the business. So I was employee one to do that. It was a great honor to do it. And the first thing we did is we partnered with AWS because we needed to get FedRAMP compliant. We knew we were going to go into DoD. So we needed to go to the Impact Level five. And eventually we'll be able to go up level six with AWS. And so it was our partnership started there. And as you've seen in five years with all the change that's happened, that obviously the breaches like SolarWinds, and the people up here talking about them all week with you I'm sure. The executive order came down from the Biden Administration, who I completely salute for being just tremendous leaders in the cybersecurity space. And the executive order, one of the big pieces of the executive order was every agency must produce a plan for zero trust. So our cloud platform that is on AWS is a zero trust platform. It is the first and only zero trust platform to get authorized by the federal government at the FedRAMP level, and now the IL five level. So, together we are literally capturing and taking over the, being the leader in the zero trust space for the federal government. And I'm going to get a sip of water, so forgive me, I've been here all week talking to a lot of people, so forgive me for that. >> That's one thing that we don't have to deal with when we're on Zoom, right, is you don't really have the risk of losing your voice. >> Stephen: There you go. >> But in terms of the executive order, something that you mentioned, SolarWinds, Colonial Pipeline, we only hear about some of the big ones. The fact that ransomware happens one attack every 10, 11 seconds, it's a matter of when we get hit, not if. >> As you know, the story coming up from me, coming up on stage with you today, I just got myself breached just this morning, just individually. So yes, it's going to get all of us. And especially, I think when you look at zero trust and ransomware and how they worked out how zero trust can prevent it, you look at the SLED market, you know, state, local governments, they don't have the dollars to go spend like DHS does, or say, some of the DoD does. So, our partnership with AWS allows us to produce a product that is very cost-effective on a per user basis, consumption model, which is what AWS has been famous for since day one, right, the consumption model, use it when you need it, don't use it when you don't. We built our software the same way. So, at some point in a year, in a school year, we'll ramp up with some schools up to a hundred thousand users in the district, and over the summer we'll ramp down to a thousand, and we just bill them for that. So it's a beautiful relationship that we partner in not just the executive order, but being a partner in SLED, fed in the sense that matches making our business together, match the government's business. And that makes us a true leader and makes us a cost-effective solution. And if you think about it just for a moment, yesterday, I told you I was testifying in front of the Senate. And one of the questions I got asked was, oh, how many security updates do you guys see a year? I said, a year, well, we do over 200,000 a day. 200,000 security updates from potential hackers every single day. And we're doing that over 200 billion transactions a day run on AWS. So it's tremendous partnership, and to be able to work like that, and at that kind of volume, and be able to go up and down with the, and you got AWS able to scope up and down, and us to be able to ride that wave with them. It's been great. >> One of the things that we always talk about when we talk AWS is they're customer focused or customer obsession that, hey, we start backwards, we work backwards from the customer. Same thing, synergistic from a cultural perspective? >> Absolutely, I mean, one of the things I always love about AWS and I've been a customer of AWS for many years, even prior to my Zscaler days, I love the way they approach things, right? If they're not trying to go out and sell it, they're trying to meet with the customer and find out what the customer needs, and then build a solution. We're the same way. I always tell, you know, when you think of our solutions, Zscaler, I always tell my sales teams, I say it takes four sales calls for people to really understand what we do. And AWS, in the beginning of AWS, it was kind of the same thing. In the old days, you know, we all just built data centers and we had all these racks, and all this expense and mesh is what you did. It was unusual back in the day, 10 years ago, and I've been to every single re:Invent. I mean, the first one there was like, you're actually going to put all your stuff in this unknown cloud thing, and it will be available when you need it? So yes, you know, the way that they did it is the same way we do it together today. And we do it together today. We partner on many deals today where we're both, our teams are in there together, selling together, whether it's the DoD, federal agencies, SLED agencies, and commercial, you know, selling it hand-in-hand because it's that same philosophy is we're going to build what a customer needs. We're not going to tell the customer what they need. We're going to hear what they need, and that's the same relationship. So I'm going to get another sip real quick. >> Go for it. One of the things that has been a theme that we've heard the last couple of days is every company needs to be a data company or private sector, public sector, and if they're not, they're probably not going to be around much longer. How do you help customers get their handle around that? Because the security threats are only increasing. I mean, it's ransomware as a service. The fact that these criminals are getting much more brazen, you just had this happen to yourself, but enabling them to become data-driven organizations and use the data, extract the value from it securely, that's hard. >> It is, I mean, if you think back in the day, I mean, companies didn't have chief compliance officers that worked in the space that we do. Their chief compliance officer back in the day was the guy that was writing your HR issues and what OSHA issues, and of course, I still deal with some of that stuff, but my true job is really around the data, right? You know, how do we build our platforms, what decisions we make on our platforms, how we're going to certify them to support that, and I mean, chief data officers, chief security officers, I mean, you go into companies today, even car dealerships today. I mean, I'm picking one, you never thought of them having a security officer, but they do, they have to, they have to. And I mean, basic school districts, I mean, I don't about you, when I was a kid and went to school, they didn't have computers, but when my kid went to school, they did, but they didn't have a security officer. Now today, every single school district has security officers. I mean, I love how you said it, that data-driven, that data thought is there. It has to be, it's a real threat. And the sad thing is of these ransomware attacks, how many don't get reported. >> Oh, right, we're only hearing about a select few. >> The numbers are something like 88% don't get reported. It's that big. So that just tells you, we hear the big ones, right, Colonial Pipeline, things like that. We don't hear about West Texas or Middle Illinois school district that paid five grand because somebody had something on the school. That's how, as you said, this ransomware as a service security, we call it a security as a service, there's SaaS, which is software as a service, we're security software as a service, and AWS is the infrastructure as a service that we run on. And that's how it works well together. >> Do you guys go into accounts together from a go-to-market perspective? >> We, do, we can always do a better job. And my good friend here at AWS, who's probably listening, we can always do better. But yeah, so it is become something that, especially in the government space we do, in federal, DoD, because the certifications are really important, certifications are important everywhere, and we have many, we talked about all the certifications we have in federal, FedRAMP and IL five, and we have a plethora of those certifications in the commercial space. But they mean in a federal space, they're really the ticket. They call them the ENERGY STAR of approval, good housekeeping piece. So, you know, having that, teaming up with AWS who we partner together and because AWS has the same certs, we can sell at the same levels. And we do a really great job of co-selling in that space together. And I think when they look at us and they say, well, you're AWS, they've got their FedRAMP high, IL five, and you're Zscaler, you got your FedRAMP high, IL five. Yes, we can do business with these guys, and that's important. >> So you guys both open doors for each other. >> We do, we do in many cases, yeah. As a matter of fact, re:Invent five years ago, a buddy of mine here opened a big, big account for us, which is today our largest account in federal came from re:Invent, where came up to me and said, hey, my customer wants to, he's looking to do something, they're an agency that has global footprint, and they're like, we want to do something as a security as a service. They don't want to ship boxes all over the place. And we just met the customer for a coffee, and next thing you know, became our, still today, our probably largest customer in federal. >> Wow, well, this is the 10th re:Invent, you said you've been to all of them. >> Stephen: I have been to all of them. I can't lie, but I can't say I did all the virtual ones. I mean, I was logged in. (laughs) >> That's okay, we'll wink on that one. But, one of the things then, we've just got about a minute left here, is in new leadership, Andy Jassy being promoted to the CEO of Amazon, we've got Adam Selipsky, heard lot of announcements and news from Adam yesterday, but some of the things that we've been talking about on theCUBE is the first 15 years of innovation at AWS, that's going to accelerate. Do you see that also, like if you look forward to the next decade, do you see things moving much faster than they did the past decade? >> I don't think they can't. I mean, I shouldn't say they have to. And the change of the guard as you might call it here, is it's always good to have a change of the guard I think. You know, the question is when's Andy going to go to space? I mean, that's the next. (Lisa laughs) I think you have the guys who got AWS to the dance, and now the dance, who's going to become the belle of the ball. And this next generation of leadership coming in is fabulous. I think they've made great decisions, and I think they're going to do really well. And we're behind them, we support it. I got a chance to meet with most of them, love a chance to meet with Andy, I haven't met with him yet. So Andy, I'd love to meet you sometime soon. But I'm very impressed with what they've done. And yes, I think it's going to be, the last 10 years of growth is going to be a year next year. I think literally, you take 10 years be compressed to a year, and then next year it will be compressed to a day. So it's moving that fast. >> Yep, get your neck brace on, prepare for that whiplash. >> Yeah, right? That's what I said to Jeff when Jeff went to space, that's how fast we're about to travel, right? But it's really relative. >> It is, there is no limit. Well, Stephen, thank you for joining me, talking about Zscaler, AWS, what you guys are doing, how you're helping to revolutionize the public sector, fed, SLED, a lot of great stuff there. Security is an ever-evolving topic, and we appreciate all of your insights. >> Well, it was wonderful to be here. Great to see you again. And great to be back with all our friends at re:Invent. >> All of our friends, exactly. >> Stephen: Thank you so much for the time today. >> My pleasure. For Stephen Kovac, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE, the global leader in live tech coverage. (pleasant music)
SUMMARY :
and I'm pleased to welcome enjoying Vegas, loving the on video conferencing, you just can't. Can't, and you see people And I hope that this can So, you expect that. Talk to me about the especially in the zero and we have seen such massive changes And the first thing we did is you don't really have the But in terms of the executive order, and be able to go up and down with the, One of the things is the same way we do it together today. One of the things that has been a theme And the sad thing is of Oh, right, we're only and AWS is the infrastructure and because AWS has the same certs, So you guys both open and next thing you know, you said you've been to all of them. I did all the virtual ones. is the first 15 years I mean, that's the next. on, prepare for that whiplash. about to travel, right? and we appreciate all of your insights. And great to be back with much for the time today. the global leader in live tech coverage.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Stephen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stephen Kovac | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adam Selipsky | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
88% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two remote sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two live sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Biden Administration | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
one piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SolarWinds | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five grand | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
next decade | DATE | 0.98+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
one application | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first 15 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
200,000 security updates | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
DHS | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
over 100 guests | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SLED | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Lisa Lorenzin, Zscaler | AWS re:Invent 2021
>>Welcome to the cubes, continuing coverage of AWS reinvent 2021. I'm your host, Lisa Martin. We are running one of the industry's most important and largest hybrid tech events of the year. This year with AWS and its ecosystem partners. We have two life studios, two remote studios, and over 100 guests. So stick around as we talk about the next 10 years of cloud innovation, I'm very excited to be joined by another Lisa from Zscaler. Lisa Lorenzen is here with me, the field CTO for the Americas. She's here to talk about ZScaler's mission to make doing business and navigating change a simpler, faster, and more productive experience. Lisa, welcome to the program. >>Thank you. It's a pleasure to be here. >>So let's talk about Zscaler in AWS. Talk to me about the partnership, what you guys are doing together. >>Yeah, definitely. Z scaler is a strategic security ISV partner with AWS. So we provide AWS customers with zero trust, secure remote access to AWS, and this can improve their security posture as well as their user experience with AWS. These scaler recently announced that we are the first and only cloud security service to achieve the FedRAMP PI authorization to operate. And that FedRAMP ZPA service is built on AWS gov cloud. ZScaler's also an AWS marketplace seller where our customers can purchase our zero trust exchange services as well as request or high value security assessments. We're excited about that as we're seeing a rapid increase in customer adoption as these scaler via the AWS marketplace, we vetted our software on AWS edge services that support emerging use cases, including 5g, IOT, and OT. So for example, Zscaler runs on wavelength, outposts, snowball and snowcones, and Zscaler has strategic partnerships with leading AWS service providers and system integration partners, including Verizon NTT, BT, Accenture, Deloitte, and many of the leading national and regional AWS consulting partners. >>Great summary there. So you mentioned something I want to get more understanding on this. It sounds like it's a differentiator for CSO scale. You said that you guys recently announced to the first and only cloud security service to achieve FedRAMP high. Uh, ATO built on AWS gov cloud. Talk to me about and what the significance of that is. >>I L five authorization to operate means that we are able to protect federal assets for the department of defense, as well as for the civilian agencies. It just extends the certification of our cloud by the government to ensure that we meet all of the requirements to protect that military side of the house, as well as the civilian side of the house. >>Got it super important there, let's talk about zero trust. It's a super hot topic. We've seen so many changes to the threat landscape during the pandemic. How are some of the ways that Z scaler and AWS are helping customers tackle this together? >>Well, I'd actually like to answer that by telling a little bit of a story. Um, Growmark is one of our Z scaler and AWS success stories when they had to send everyone home to work from home overnight, the quote that we had from is the users just went home and nothing changed. ZPA made work from anywhere, just work, and they were able to maintain complete business continuity. So even though their employers might have had poor internet service at home, or, you know, 80 challenging infrastructure, if you've got kids on your wifi bunch of kids in the neighborhood doing remote school, everyone's working from home, you don't have the reliability or the, maybe the bandwidth capacity that you would when you're sitting in an office. And Zscaler private access is a cloud delivered zero trust solution that leverages dynamic resilient, TLS encrypted tunnels to connect the user to an application rather than putting an end point on a network. >>And the reason that's important is it makes for a much more reliable and resilient service, even in environments that may not have the best connectivity I live out in the county. I really, some days think that there's a hamster on a wheel somewhere in my cable modem network, and I am a consumer of this, right. I connect to Z scaler over Zscaler private access, I'm protected by Zscaler internet access. And so I access our internal applications that are running in AWS as well this way. And it makes a huge difference. Growmark really started with an SAP migration to AWS, and this was long before the pandemic. So they started out looking for that better user experience and the zero trust capability. They were able to ensure that their SAP environment was dark to the internet, even though it was running in the cloud. And that put them in this position to leverage that zero trust service when the pandemic was upon us, >>That ability or that quote that you mentioned, it just worked was absolutely critical for all of us in every industry. And I'm sure a lot of folks who were trying to manage working from home, the spouses from home kids doing, you know, school online also felt like you with the hamster on the wheel, I'm sure their internet access, but being able to have that business continuity was table-stakes especially early on for most organizations. We saw a lot of digital transformation, a lot of acceleration of it in the last 20 months during the pandemic. Talk to me about how Z scaler helps customers from a digital transformation perspective and maybe what some of the things were that you saw in the last 20 months that have accelerated >>Absolutely. Um, another example, there would be Jefferson health, and really, as we saw during the pandemic, as you say, it accelerated a lot of the existing trends of mobility, but also migration to the cloud. And when you move applications to the cloud, honestly, it's a complex environment and maybe the controls and the risk landscape is not as well. Understood. So Z scaler also has another solution, which is our cloud security posture management. And this is really ensuring that your configuration on your environment, that those workloads run in is controlled, understood correctly, coordinated and configured. So as deference and health migrated to the cloud first model, they were able to leverage the scalers workload posture to measure and control that risk. Again, it's environment where the combination of AWS and Z scaler together gives them a flexible, resilient solution that they can be confident is correctly configured and thoroughly locked down. >>And that's critical for businesses in any organization, especially as quickly as how quickly things changed in the last 20 months or so I do wonder how your customer conversations have has changed as I introduced you as the field CTO of the America's proceeds killer. I'm sure you talk with a lot of customers. How has the security posture, um, zero trust? How has that risen up within the organizational chain? Is that something that the board is concerned about? >>My gosh, yes. And zero trust really has gone through the Gartner hype cycle. You've got the introduction, the peak of interest, the trough of despair, and then really rising back into what's actually feasible. Only zero trust has done that on a timeline of over a decade. When the term was first introduced, I was working with firewall VPN enact technology, and frankly, we didn't necessarily have the flexibility, the scalability, or the resilience to offer true zero trust. You can try to do that with network security controls, but when you're really protecting a user connecting to an application, you've got an abstraction layer mismatch. What we're seeing now is the reemergence of zero trust as a priority. And this was greatly accelerated honestly by the cybersecurity executive order that came out a few months ago from the Biden administration, which made zero trust a priority for the federal government and the public sector, but also raised visibility on zero trust for the private sector as well. >>When we're looking at zero trust as a way to perhaps ward off some of these high profile breaches and outages like the colonial pipeline, whole situation that was based on some legacy technology for remote access that was exploited and led to a breach that they had to take their entire infrastructure offline to mitigate. If we can look at more modern delivery mechanisms and more sophisticated controls for zero trust, that helps the board address a number of challenges ranging from obviously risk management, but also agility and cost reduction in an environment where more than ever belts are being tightened. New ways of delivering applications are being considered. But the ability to innovate is more important than ever. >>It is more important than ever the ability to innovate, but it really changing security landscape. I'm glad to hear that you're seeing, uh, this change as a result of the executive order that president Biden put down in the summer. That's good news. It sounds like there's some progress being made there, but we saw, you mentioned colonial pipeline. We saw a lot in the last 20, 22 months or so with ransomware becoming a household word, also becoming something that is a matter of when companies in any industry get hit and versus if it's no longer kind of that choice anymore. So talk to me about some of the threats and some of the stats that Z scaler has seen particularly in the last 20, 22 months. >>Oh gosh. Well, let's see. I'm just going to focus on the last 12 months, cause that's really where we've got some of the best data. We've seen a 500% increase in ransomware delivered over encrypted channels. And what that means is it's really critical to have scalable SSL inspection that can operate at wire speed without impeding the user experience or delay in critical projects, server communications, activities that need to happen without any introduced in any additional latency. So if you think about what that takes the Z scaler internet access solution is protecting users, outbound access in the same way that Zscaler private access protects access to private resources. So we're really seeing more and more organizations seeing that both of these services are necessary to deliver a comprehensive zero trust. You have to protect and control the outbound traffic to make sure that nothing good leaks out, nothing bad sneaks in. >>And at the same time, you have to protect and control the inbound traffic and inbound is, you know, a much broader definition with apps in the data center in the cloud these days. We're also seeing that 30% of malware is delivered through trusted applications like file shares or collaboration tools. So it's no longer enough to only inspect web traffic. Now you have to be able to really inspect all flavors of traffic when you're doing that outbound protection. So another good example where Z scaler and AWS work together here is in Amazon workspaces. And there's a huge trend towards desktop as a service, for example, and organizations are starting to recognize that they need to protect both the user experience and also the connectivity onward in Amazon workspaces, the same way that they would for a traditional end user device. So we see Z scaler running in the Amazon workspaces instances to protect that outbound traffic and control that inbound traffic as well. >>Another big area is the ransomware infections are not the problem. It's the result. So over half of the ransomware infections include data theft or leakage. And that is a double whammy because you get what's called double extortion where not only do you have to pay to unlock your machines, but you have to pay not to have that stolen data exposed to the rest of the world. So it's more important than ever to be able to break that kill chain as early as possible to ensure that the or the server traffic itself isn't exposed to the initial infection vector. If you do happen to get an infection vector that sneaks through, you need to be able to control the lateral movement so that it doesn't spread in your environment. And then if both of those controls fail, you also need the outbound protection such as CASBY and DLP to ensure that even if they get into the environment, they can't exfiltrate any of the data that they find as a result. We're seeing that the largest security risk today is lateral movement inside the corporate network. And that's one of the things that makes these ransomware double extortion situations, such a problem. >>Last question for you. And we've got about a minute left. I'm curious, you said over 50% of ransomware attacks are now double extortion. How do you guys help customers combat that? So >>We really deliver a solution that eliminates a lot of the attack surface and a lot of the risks. We have no inbound listener, unlike a traditional VPN. So the outbound only connections mean you don't have the external attack surface. You can write these granular policy controls to eliminate lateral movement. And because we integrate with customer's existing identity and access management, we can eliminate the credential exposure that can lead to a larger spread in a compromised environment. We also can eliminate the problem of unpatched gateways, which led to things like colonial pipeline or some of the other major breaches we've seen recently. And we can remove that single point of failure. So you can rely on dynamic optimized traffic distribution for all of these secure services. Basically, what we're trying to do is make it simpler and more secure at the same time, >>Simpler and more secure at the same time is what everyone needs regardless of industry. Lisa, thank you for joining me today, talking about Zscaler in AWS, zero trust the threat landscape that you're seeing, and also how's the scaler and AWS together can help customers mitigate those growing risks. We appreciate your insights and your thoughtfulness. >>Thank you >>For Lisa Lorenzen. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the cubes coverage of AWS reinvent stick around more great content coming up next.
SUMMARY :
We are running one of the industry's most important and largest It's a pleasure to be here. Talk to me about the partnership, what you guys are doing together. So we provide AWS customers with zero trust, secure remote access to AWS, You said that you guys recently announced to the first and only cloud of the requirements to protect that military side of the house, as well as the civilian side of the house. We've seen so many changes to the threat landscape during the pandemic. of kids in the neighborhood doing remote school, everyone's working from home, you don't have the reliability or in this position to leverage that zero trust service when the pandemic was upon us, it in the last 20 months during the pandemic. And when you move applications to the cloud, Is that something that the board is concerned the scalability, or the resilience to offer true zero trust. But the ability to innovate is more important It is more important than ever the ability to innovate, but it really changing security landscape. of these services are necessary to deliver a comprehensive zero trust. And at the same time, you have to protect and control the inbound traffic and inbound is, ensure that the or the server traffic itself isn't I'm curious, you said over 50% of ransomware So the outbound only connections mean you don't have the Lisa, thank you for joining me today, talking about Zscaler in AWS, zero trust the threat landscape more great content coming up next.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa Lorenzen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Deloitte | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa Lorenzin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
BT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
500% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two remote studios | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two life studios | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 100 guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
over 50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
This year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Biden | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first model | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Growmark | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
single point | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
CASBY | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
over a decade | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Americas | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
Verizon NTT | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.91+ |
last 12 months | DATE | 0.91+ |
last 20 months | DATE | 0.9+ |
IOT | TITLE | 0.89+ |
80 challenging infrastructure | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
a minute | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
last 20 | DATE | 0.83+ |
ZPA | TITLE | 0.83+ |
ATO | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
Z scaler | TITLE | 0.81+ |
Jefferson | PERSON | 0.81+ |
ZScaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
Breaking Analysis: The Case for Buy the Dip on Coupa, Snowflake & Zscaler
from the cube studios in palo alto in boston bringing you data driven insights from the cube and etr this is breaking analysis with dave vellante by the dip has been been an effective strategy since the market bottomed in early march last year the approach has been especially successful in tech and even more so for those tech names that one were well positioned for the forced march to digital i sometimes call it i.e remote work online commerce data centric platforms and certain cyber security plays and two already had the cloud figured out the question on investors minds is where to go from here should you avoid some of the high flyers that are richly valued with eye-popping multiples or should you continue to buy the dip and if so which companies that capitalized on the trends from last year will see permanent shifts in spending patterns that make them a solid long-term play hello and welcome to this week's wikibon cube insights powered by etr in this breaking analysis we shine the spotlight on three companies that may be candidates for a buy the dip strategy and it's our pleasure to welcome in ivana delevco who's the chief investment officer and founder of spear alpha a new research-centric etf focused on industrial technology ivana is a long-time equity analyst with a background in both long and short investing ivana welcome to the program thanks so much for coming on thanks for having me david yeah it's really our pleasure i i want to start with your etf and give the folks a bit more background about you first you know we gotta let people know i'm not an investment pro i'm not an advisor i don't make stock recommendations i don't sell investments so you got to do your own research i have a lot of data so happy to share it but you got to understand your own risks you of course yvonne on the other hand you do offer investment services and so people before investing got to carefully review all the available available investment docs understand what you're getting into before you invest now with that out of the way ivana i have some stats up here on this slide your spear you're a newly launched female lead firm that does deep research into the supply chain we're going to talk about that you try to uncover as i understand it under-appreciated industrial tech firms and some really pretty cool areas that we list here but tell us a little bit more about your background and your etf so thanks for having me david my background is in industrial research and industrial technology investments i've spent the past 15 years covering this space and what we've seen over the past five years is technology changes that are really driving fundamental shifts in industrial manufacturing processes so whether this is 5g connectivity innovation in the software stack increasing compute speeds all of these are major technological advancements that are impacting uh traditional manufacturers so what we try to do is assess speak to these firms and assess who is at the leading and who is at the lagging end of this digital transformation and we're trying to assess what vendors they're using what processes they're implementing and that is how we generate most of our investment ideas okay great and and we show on the bottom of of this sort of intro slide if you will uh so one of the processes that you use and one of the things that that is notable a lot of people compare you uh to kathy woods are investments when you came out uh i think you use a different process i mean maybe there are some similarities in terms of disruption but at the bottom of this slide it shows a mckinsey sort of graphic that that i think informs people as to how you really dig into the supply chain from a research standpoint is that right absolutely so for us it's all about understanding the supply chain going deep in the supply chain and gather data points from primary sources that we can then translate into investment opportunities so if you look at this mckinsey graph uh you will see that there is a lot of opportunity to for these companies to transform themselves both on the front end which means better revenue better products and on their operation side which means lower cost whether it's through better operations or through better processes on the the back end so what we do is we will speak to a traditional manufacturing company and ask them okay well what do you use for better product development and they will give us the name of the firms and give us an assessment of what's the differences between the competitors why they like one versus the other so then we're gonna take the data and we will put it into our financial model and we'll understand the broader market for it um the addressable market the market share that the company has and will project the growth so for these higher growth stocks that that you cover the main alpha generation uh potential here is to understand what the amount of growth these companies will generate over the next 10 to 20 years so it's really all about projecting growth in the next three years in the next five years and where will growth ultimately settle in in the next 10 to 20 years love it we're gonna have a fun conversation because today we're going to get into your thesis for cooper snowflake and z scalar we're going to bring in some of our own data some of our data from etr and and why you think these companies may be candidates for long-term growth and and be buy the dip stock so to do that i hacked up this little comparison slide we're showing here i do this for context our audience knows i'm not a cfa or a valuation expert but we like to do simple comparisons just to give people context and a sense of relative size growth and valuation and so this chart attempts to do that so what i did is i took the most recent quarterly revenue for cooper snowflake and z scalar multiplied it by four to get a run rate we included servicenow in the table just for baseline reference because bill mcdermott as we've reported aspires to make service now the next great enterprise software company alongside with salesforce and oracle and some of the others and and all these companies that we list here that through the three here they aspire to do so in their own domain so we're displaying the market cap from friday morning september 10th we calculated a revenue run rate multiple and we show the quarterly revenue growth and what this data does is gives you a sense of the three companies they're well on their way to a billion dollars in revenue it underscores the relationship between revenue growth and valuation snowflake being the poster child for that dynamic savannah i know you do much more detailed financial analysis but let's talk about these companies in order maybe start with koopa they just crushed their quarter i mean they blew away consensus on the top line what else about the company do you like and why is it on your by the dip list so just to back up david on valuation these companies investors either directly or indirectly value on a dcf basis and what happened at the beginning of the year as interest rates started increasing people started freaking out and once you plug in 100 basis points higher interest rate in your dcf model you get significant price downside so that really drove a lot of the pullback at the beginning of the year right now where we stand today interest rates haven't really moved all that significantly off the bot of the bottom they're still around the same levels maybe a little bit higher but those are not the types of moves that are going to drive significant downside in this stock so as things have stabilized here a lot of these opportunities look pretty attractive on that basis so koopa specifically came out of our um if you go back to that uh the chart of like where the opportunities lie in um in across the manufacturing uh um enterprise koopa is really focused on business pen management so they're really trying to help companies reduce their cost uh and they're a leader in the space uh they're unique uh unique in that they're cloud-based so the feedback we've been hearing from from our companies that use it jetblue uses it train technologies uses it the feedback we've been hearing is that they love the ease of implementation so it's very easy to implement and it drives real savings um savings for these companies so we see in our dcf model we see multiple years of this 30 40 percent growth and that's really driving our price target yeah and we can i can confirm that i mean i mean just anecdotally you know you know we serve a lot of the technology community and many of our clients are saying hey okay you know when you go to do invoicing or whatever you work with procurement it's koopa you know this is some ariba that's kind of the legacy which is sap we'll talk about that a little later but let's talk about snowflake um you know snowflake we've been tracking them very closely we know the management there we've watched them through their last two companies now here and have been following that company early on since since really 2015. tell us why you like snowflake um and and maybe why you think it can continue its rapid growth thanks david so first of all i need to compliment you on your research on the company on the technology side so where we come in is more from understanding where our companies can use soft snowflake and where snowflake can add value so what we've been hearing from our companies is the challenge that they're facing is that everybody's moving to the cloud but it's not as simple as just send your data to the cloud and call aws and they're gonna generate more revenue for your solve your cost problem so what we've been hearing is that companies need to find tools that are easy to use where they can use their own domain expertise and just plug and play so um ansys is one of the companies we covered the dust simulation they've found snowflake to be an extremely useful tool in sales lead generation and within sales crm systems have been around for a while and they're they've really been implemented but analyzing sales numbers is something that is new to this company some some of our companies don't even know what their sales are even when they look back after the quarter is closed so tools like this help um companies do easy analytics and therefore drive revenue and cost savings growth so we see really big runway for for this company and i think the most misunderstood part about it is that people view it as a warehousing data warehousing play while this is all about compute and the company does a good job separating the two and what our their customers like or like the companies that we cover like about it is that it can lower their compute costs um and make it much easier much more easily manageable for them great and we're going to talk about more about each of these companies but let's talk about z-scaler a bit i mean z-scaler is a company we've been very excited about and identified them kind of early on they've definitely benefited from the move to cloud generally and specifically the remote work uh situation with the cyber threats etc but tell us why you like z-scaler so interestingly z-scaler um we like the broader security space um the broader cyber security space and interestingly our companies are not yet spending to the level that is commensurate with the increase in attack rate so we think this is a trend that is really going to accelerate as we go forward um my own board 20 of the time on the last board meeting was spent on cyber security what we're doing and this is a pretty simple operation that that we're running here so you can imagine for a large enterprise with thousands of people all around the world um needing to be on a single simple system z-scaler really fits well here very easy to implement several of our industrial companies use it siemens uses it ge uses it and they've had great great experience with it excellent i just want to take a quick look at how some of these names have performed over the last year and and what if anything this data tells us this is a chart comparing the past 12 months performance of of those four companies uh that we just talked about and we added in you know servicenow z scalar as you can see has outperformed the other despite your commentary on discounted cash flow snowflake is underperformed really precisely for the reasons that you mentioned not to mention the fact that it was pretty highly valued and you can see relative to the nas but it's creeping back lately after very strong earnings even though the stock dropped after it beat earnings because the street wants the cfo to say to guide even higher than maybe as mike scarpelli feels is prudent and you can see cooper has also underperformed relatively speaking i mean it absolutely destroyed consensus this week the stock went up but it's been off with the the weaker market this week i know you like to take a longer term view but but anything you would add here yeah so interestingly both z-scaler and koopa were in the camp of as we went into earnings expectations were already pretty high because few of their competitors reported very strong results so this scalar yesterday their revenue growth was was pretty strong the stock is down today uh and the reason is because people were kind of caught up a little bit in the noise of this quarter growth is 57 last quarter it was 60 like is this a deceleration we don't see it as that at all and the company brought up one point that i thought was extremely interesting which is as their deal sizes are getting larger it takes a little longer time for them to see the revenue come through so it takes a little bit of time to for you to see it into from billings into into revenue same thing with cooper very strong earnings report but i think expectations were already pretty high going into it uh given the service now and um and anna plan as well reported strong results so i think it's all about positioning so we love these setups where you can buy the deep in on this opportunity where like people get caught up in um short-term noise and and it creates good entry points excellent i i want to bring in some data from our partner etr and see if you have any comments ivana so what we're showing here is a two-dimensional chart we like to show this uh very frequently it's based on a survey of between a thousand and fifteen hundred chief information officers and technology buyers every quarter this is from their most recent july survey the vertical axis shows net score which is a measure of spending momentum i mean this it measures the net percentage of customers in the survey that are spending more on a particular product or platform in other words it essentially subtracts the percentage of customers spending less from those spending more which yields a net score it's more granular than that but basically that's what it does the horizontal axis is market share or pervasiveness in the data set it's not revenue market share like you get from idc it's it's a mention market share and now that red dotted line at the 40 percent mark on the vertical represents an elevated level in other words anything above 40 percent we consider notable and we've plotted our three by the dip companies and included some of their competitors for context and you can see we added salesforce servicenow and oracle and that orange ellipse because they're some of the bigger names in the software business so let's take these in alphabetical order ivana starting with koopa in the blue you can see we plotted them next to sap's ariba and you can see cooper has stronger spending momentum but not as much presence in the market so to me my influence is oh that's an opportunity for them to steal share more modern technology you know more facile and of course oracle has products in this space but the oracle dot includes all oracle products not just the procurement stuff but uh maybe your thoughts on this absolutely i love this chart i think that's your spot on this would be the same way i would interpret the chart where um increased spending momentum is is a sign of the company providing products that people like and we we expect to see cooper's share grow market share grow over time as well so let's come back to the chart and i want to i want to really point out the green ellipse this is the data zone if you will uh and we're like a broken record on this program with snowflake has performed unbelievably well in net score and spending momentum every quarter the dtr has captured enough end sample in its survey holding near or above 80 percent its net score consistently is has been up there and we've plotted data bricks in that zone it's been expected right that data bricks is going to do an ipo this year late last month company raised 1.6 billion in a private round so i guess that was either a strategy to delay the ipo or raise a bunch more cash and give late investors a low risk bite at the apple you know pre-ipo as we saw with snowflake last year what we didn't plot here are some of snowflake's biggest competitors ivana who also happen to be their partners most notably the big cloud players all who have their own database offerings aws microsoft and google now you've said snowflake is much more than a database company i wonder if you could add some color here yeah that's a very good point david uh basically the the driver of the thesis in snowflake is all about acceleration and spending and what we are seeing is the customers that are signed up on their platform today they're not even spending they're probably spending less than five percent of what they can ultimately spend on this product and the reason is because they don't yet know what the ultimate applications are for this right so you're gonna start with putting the data in a format you can use and you need to come up with use cases or how are you actually going to use this data so back to the example that i gave with answers the first use case that they found was trying to optimize leads there could be like 100 other use cases and they're coming up with with those on a daily basis so i would expect um this score to keep keep uh keep up pretty high or or go even higher as we as people figure out how they can use this product you know the buy-the-dip thesis on snowflake was great last quarter because the stock pulled back after they announced earnings and when we reported we said you know mike the the company see well cleveland research came out remember they got the dip on that and we looked at the data and we said mike scarpelli said that you know we're going to probably as a percentage of overall customers decelerate the net net new logos but we're going deeper into the customer base and that's exactly what's happening with with snowflake but okay let's bring up the slide again last but not least the z scaler we love z scalar we named z scaler in 2019 as an emerging four-star security company along with crowdstrike and octa and we said these three should be on your radar and as you see we've plotted z scalar with octa who with its it's its recent move into to converging identity and governance uh it gets kind of interesting uh we plotted them with palo alto as well another cyber security player that we've covered extensively we love octa in addition to z-scaler we great respect for palo alto and you'll note all of them are over that 40 percent line these are disruptors they're benefiting well not so much palo alto they're more legacy but the the other two are benefiting from that shift to work from home cloud security modern tech stack uh the acquisition that octa-made of of of auth0 and again z scalar cloud security getting rid of a lot of hardware uh really has a huge tailwind at its back if on a zscaler you know they've benefited from the huge my cloud migration trend what are your thoughts on the company so i actually love all three companies that are there right and the point is people are just going to spend more money whether you are on the cloud of the cloud the data centers need more security as well so i think there is a strong case to be made for all three with this scaler the upside is that it's just very easy to use very easy to implement and if you're somebody that is just setting up infrastructure on the cloud there is no reason for you to call any other competitor right with palo alto the case there is that if you have an established um security platfor if you're on their security platform the databa on the data center side uh they they did introduce through several acquisitions a pretty attractive cloud offering as well so they've been gaining share as well in the space and and the company does look pretty attractive on valiation basis so for us cyber security is really all about rising tide lifts all boats here right so you can have a pure play like this scaler uh that benefits from the cloud but even somebody like palo alto is pretty well positioned um to benefit yeah we think so too over a year ago we reported on the valuation divergence between palo alto and fortinet fortinet was doing a better job moving to the cloud and obviously serves more of a mid-market space palo alto had some go-to-market execution challenges we said at the time they're going to get through those and when we talk to chief information security officers palo alto is like the gold standard they're the thought leader they want to work with them but at the same time they also want to participate in some of these you know modern cloud stacks so i we agree there's plenty of room for all three um just to add a bit more color and drill into the spending data a little bit more this slide here takes that net score and shows the progression since january 2019 and you can see a snowflake just incredible in terms of its ability to maintain that elevated net score as we talked about and the table on the insert it shows you the number of responses and all three of these companies have been getting more mentions over time but snowflake and z scale are now both well over 100 n in the survey each quarter and the other notable piece here and this is really important you can see all three are coming out of the isolation economy with the spending uptick nice upticks shown in the most recent survey so that's again another positive but i want to close ivana with kind of making the bull and bear case and have you address really the risks to the buy the dip scenario so look there are a lot of reasons to like these companies we talked about them cooper they've got earnings momentum you know management on the call side had very strong end market demand this the stock you know has underperformed the nasdaq you know this year snowflake and zscaler they also have momentum snowflake get this enormous tam uh although they were punished for not putting a hard number on it which is ridiculous in my opinion i mean the thing is it's huge um the investors were just kind of you know wanting a little binky baby blanket but they all have modern tech in the cloud and really importantly this shows in the etr surveys you know the momentum that they have so very high retention is the other point i wanted to make the very very low churn of these companies however cooper's management despite the blowout quarter they gave kind of underwhelming guidance they've cited headwinds uh they've with the the the lamisoft uh migration to their cloud platform snowflake is kind of like price to perfection so maybe that's an advantage because every every little negative news is going to going to cause the company to dip but it's you know it's pretty high value because salutman and scarpelli everybody expects them to surpass what happened at servicenow which was a rocket ship and it could be all argued that all three are richly priced and overvalued so but ivana you're looking out as you said a couple of years three years maybe even five years how do you think about the potential downside risks in in your by the dip scenario you buy every dip you looking for bigger dips or what's your framework there so what we try to do is really look every quarter the company reports is there something that's driving fundamental change to the story or is it a one-off situation where people are just misunderstanding what the company is reporting so in the case we kind of addressed some of the earnings that that were reported but with koopa we think the man that management is guiding conservatively as they should so we're not very concerned about their ability to execute on on the guidance and and to exceed the guidance with snowflake price to perfection that's never a good idea to avoid a stock uh because it just shows that there is the company is doing a great job executing right so um we are looking for reports like the cleveland report where they would be like negative on the stock and that would be an entry point uh for us so broadly we apply by the deep philosophy but not not if something fundamentally changes in the story and none of these three are showing any signs of fundamental change okay we're going to leave it right there thanks to my guest today ivana tremendous having you would love to have you back great to see you thank you david and def you definitely want to check out sprx and the spear etf now remember i publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com these episodes they're all available as podcasts all you do is search breaking analysis podcasts you can always connect with me on twitter i'm at d vallante or email me at david.vellante at siliconangle.com love the comments on linkedin don't forget to check out etr.plus for all the survey action this is dave vellante for the cube insights powered by etr be well and we'll see you next time [Music] you
SUMMARY :
the company to dip but it's you know
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
mike scarpelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
palo alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
january 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
mike scarpelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
david | PERSON | 0.99+ |
40 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
1.6 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
three companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
less than five percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
early march last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
each week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
this week | DATE | 0.99+ |
dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
thousands of people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four companies | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
octa | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
crowdstrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
60 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
aws | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
koopa | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
fortinet | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
100 other use cases | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
100 basis | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
ivana | PERSON | 0.97+ |
first use case | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
cooper | PERSON | 0.97+ |
57 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ | |
each quarter | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
mckinsey | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
def | PERSON | 0.94+ |
friday morning september 10th | DATE | 0.93+ |
lamisoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
four-star | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
mike | PERSON | 0.91+ |
scarpelli | PERSON | 0.91+ |
oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
ansys | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
z scalar | TITLE | 0.91+ |
late last month | DATE | 0.9+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ | |
30 40 percent | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
d vallante | PERSON | 0.88+ |
Tom Gillis, VMware and Punit Minocha, Zscaler | VMworld 2020
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of VM World 20 >>20 brought to you by VM Ware and its ecosystem partners. Hello and welcome back to the cubes. Virtual coverage of VM World 2020 Virtual. Is the Cube virtual not there in person this year because of CO of it? I'm John for your host of the Cube. Got David wants to meet him in all the Cube folks covering, of course, with VM Ware and VM World 2022. Great guest here to talk about the future of the workforce solutions and the impact of network security and partnerships. Tom Gala, senior vice president general manager of networking and security business unit at VM Ware and put it, Men OSHA. Who's the VP of business development and corporate development at Z Scaler. Two great companies all doing extremely well as customers are dealing with Cove it And the reality is this market and putting plans in place for coming out with a growth strategy. Gentlemen, thank you for joining me today. >>Yeah, John, thanks for having us. >>Thanks for having us, >>Tom. I want to start with you. Actually, the partnership with the scaler is the discussion of this topic. But you guys do have some hard news around the future of workforce solutions. What's the hard news and has that relate to all this? >>Yeah, we sure do, John. So you know, networks were built in a very different time. Networks were built when work was a place that you came. Now, work is the thing that you do. Oftentimes you do from your living room or your den. As I am on DSO, it really calls into question some of the fundamental principles of how we build a deploy networks. In the old model, we would set up something like a branch office and we would back haul traffic using a dedicated circuit like an mpls circuit back, haul it to one of a handful of locations that we called the DMZ or Demilitarized and those locations where you would stitch together a security ensemble made out of dedicated hardware appliances, firewalls, Web proxies, I PS systems and the like And that model service? Well, Azan industry for many decades, three. I'd say 30 years. Um, all of a sudden, the whole notion of the workplace has changed and changed dramatically We're all living through that and experiencing it firsthand. And so the original model of back hauling traffic to some point in, you know, precipitating New Jersey so that you can run it through some magic black box because the model doesn't apply anymore. And so at the end, where we have a new vision for how we can take the security, the reliability, the performance that you get when you're on the corporate network and extended into people's homes. And this is in line with what industries air calling, sassy or secure access services edge. And so the news that we're announcing is we have a complete, sassy solution that involves zero trust access. It involves firewall I. D. S I. P s capability, Advanced security services and then importantly ah, very strong partnership with the scaler on. We can walk through how that works, but it's really driven by this new shape of the workplace. >>Put it, Talk about the partnership with VM where we've been following see scaler for a long time. What a great success story. Great technology team. Great business model growth in your marketplace. Congratulations on your success as you guys continue to grow the world has spun in this disruption kind of world we're in now. You guys are well poised for that. Talk about your partnership with VM Ware. >>Thanks, John. And thank you, Tom, for that quick overview. You know, just to play out this idea we started over it over a decade ago. The basic idea was you know, the users, uh, pretty much everywhere, and the applications are moving to the cloud. And so back to Tom's comment. You know, we had these networks where you were back hauling. Maybe I'll just give a very simple analogy the CIA off Nestle, you know, when he first deployed, uh, Z skater, you know, and and realized a tremendous amount of cost savings that a security. But then, more importantly, the employees off Nestle actually started blogging that the Internet had gotten faster. And when the CEO came to ah customer advisory board meeting, he made a very simple analogy. Imagine having to get out to the Internet through four major international airports worldwide. All right, so you couldn't drink directly traverse from point A to point B. But you have to transit through these four. It would be very inefficient it would really slow you down. And more often than not, you'll be complaining that was the old network architectural. And what we have chosen to do here from a security standpoint at sea Scaler, is make that security closer to the end user. Now we pride ourselves from a security standpoint, and we certainly need networking to also adapt to that. And that's where we have found our partnership with VM Ware, to be particularly strategic. We started partnering with VM were actually prior to them, acquiring Vettel Cloud, which is the software defined when, uh, networking provider, uh, just primarily because they were a cloud based networking player. And this idea off locally breaking out to the Internet Getting out to the end destination as quickly as possible is something that they did quite seamlessly. And so we started this journey, this partnership with them a few years ago and today at VM. Well, we're enhancing that, expanding the partnership not only from a product standpoint, but then, more importantly, we're leaning in from a sales go to market customer support standpoint. >>You know, that's a great point. What? I've been saying this in the queue for a while with the joke was, um the When is the new Land E? I mean, we used to have the old days, remember? Oh, campus connecting networks drive to the airport as you mentioned, the great analogy there, by the way, has to be better. People are working at home. You got technically a land un security, you know, working at home. People are realizing this. These core services have to change. It's not just connect to the Internet the old way. It's everywhere. It's networking everywhere. This is the reality of the kinds of Internet things that used to go on where it's kind of cool and secure. You know, you've got a perimeter. Everything was working. Great. Put it. You mentioned it. Why drive to the airport? Four airports with world. That's a great analogy, Tom. This points to the future. Ready concept, access anywhere. Services that are needed for the security and, more importantly, the user experience. I don't want to slow down to go faster. I wanna I wanna I wanna make it. I wanna make a good experience happen. What's your thought? >>Yeah, well, I mean, I think we're all living through this new world where we're working from home, and sometimes the user experience is less than perfect. In fact, on this broadcast you may see stuttering and break up of the video, and you know, that's that's a problem that I think needs to be solved. It's a problem that we're able to solve with virtualization. So the idea behind virtualization by putting a layer of software on top of a physical asset, you could make it easier to manage that asset. You could make that asset more efficient. We certainly did that with servers. It was really obvious. Now we're doing it to the network itself. So what this means is we have some customers. We have one customer that is in the health care industry, like during the height of the crisis, all of their doctors and researchers had to work from home, and yet they needed to use video communication tools like we're doing here. And they needed a consistently good and user experience. And so we were able to ship these customers more than 8000 boxes over the course of two weeks into people's homes. So think of a little tiny device about the size of a set top box shows up in your house and all of a sudden your zoom or your WebEx sessions just work, no more stuttering. And we're breaking up because we're able to manage the network and virtualized prioritized traffic and deliver consistently good and user experience. So managing the quality of services, a foundational capability, and we have a unique ways to do that with virtualization that I think never existed before the second step is I wanna make sure not only that it's a good user experience, but my security. All of those controls that used to live in black boxes that those replied, This is where our partnership with the scaler is so important. So the scaler has the same philosophy that we do of like, let's put this stuff in many points of presence around the world. I think you know you're in like, 100 or so points of presence, so we weren't 150. And so whatever an end user is, you just find that nearest point of presence, connect and make the shortest route possible to deliver good quality and user experience and also consistent world class security. It's zero. It's >>interesting. First of all. We'll sign up for the Cube Virtual. We need that video late challenges. But we're you know what? We shouldn't have to be video engineers to manage the packets on the round trip. This software, I mean, you know, Web Zoom, they build their entire application to manage these kinds of intellectual property challenges. So that >>brings the >>complexity of applications. So, you know, people are gonna have all these new complexities. And how do you integrate it all? >>Yeah, you know, obviously, Zoom and WebEx companies are, you know, this is court or what they do. The challenges they gotta control both ends of the wire, and and so so with with our network virtualization, we actually control the wire itself, right? We can make the wire behave in a way we can prioritize traffic so that your zoom goes ahead of Xbox Live or Netflix do things like traffic shaping, which are techniques that are actually well understood, but difficult to deploy in a physical world. In a virtual world, we could employ these techniques constantly adapting and changing to make sure that engineer experience is smooth and easy on. That's really pretty impactful. >>Put it. What's your reaction all of this because you know I'm a customer, you know? You know, I'm like, What's in it for me, guys? Integration with the scale of VM Ware. What's in it for me? Because I got now multi clouds in the horizon. I'm dealing with multiple clouds today. I got complexity and applications themselves, and I want to create the nirvana that you laid out, which is access anywhere. High speed eso I might not have the expertise in house. What do I do? What's in it for me? Take me through the value proposition. >>Absolutely. So you know, Tom touched on it. You know the idea of bringing security as close to the end user as possible. If you step back for a minute and you start to think about security usually security and user experience off a contradictory Usually if you add more security, you lose use of experience and vice versa. That's sort of what Ziese killers start to go solve. And so, you know, over a decade ago, you know, when we started to build the architectures, it was built with a few core principles in mind, right? The idea of being completely distributed today we're in over 200 points of presence worldwide. That gives us a pretty good footprint to be as close to the end user. We absolutely could not compromise own security. So this idea that if you have a finite appliance, maybe the appliance has a, you know, a limited amount of CPU or horsepower And so I will tweet the security s so that I could get more performance, not the case with how we ran about, you know, offering security. All security services run all the time. Right? So without any compromise to the end user, and then finally, you know, when it comes to the actual security itself architectures based on something called a proxy. And usually again, if you start to think about a proxy and security was, uh people don't think in a very favorable manner, they usually think it slows things down. It adds Leighton, see, it breaks applications. And again I go back to, you know, the foundational elements of the skater. When we started this journey, it was with this idea that we're gonna build this proxy from the ground up. Very high performance. Mike was second, like late and see something that you would not see in the market anywhere with this partnership. Now, right? Seamless integration between VM Wednesay skater You are now able to set up these tunnels instantly automatically, so go back to Tom's. Example. 8000 set top boxes like devices sent out to this healthcare institution. Right? You can automatically set up tunnels such that the traffic is pointing to Z scale. There's feel over capabilities, so any and all of that has been instrumented in in software. The end customers sets that up. You know can automate that templates all across those 8000 devices. You now have security at the same time with user experience. A passed away to go adapt to business needs agility, you know, being able to keep up and lower your costs because you're substantially reducing the Mpls footprint. So there's a whole bunch of disparate, uh, you know, advantages that an enterprise gets. But the biggest one off amongst them, in my mind, is just being able to address the business needs. I mean, how Maney CEO is today with Colvin are starting to realize my network is not adapting to this new normal right, and so that's sort of where this partnership between VM Ware and Z scaler comes in. It's very timely. >>Everyone's like they want more about their network, and that's like, you know, everyone's banging on the table. Great. Great point there. Thanks for taking that great explanation. I wanna just follow up with you if you if you don't mind, compare that what you just said in terms of the value of Z scaler with this partnership versus the old way, because you what you just laid out was, you know, dynamic provisioning, setting up connections, having software, automate things, compare what it was like before because, remember, I mean, people have been around the industry. No, the pain in the butt that it's been and human error Compare what the old way it was like And now with this experience, can just just >>really And I let Tom talk about, you know, things on the network side. You know, where you might have had a large behemoth like a Cisco box where you try to tweak some policy and the entire box would fall over or something along those lines from a security standpoint. Usually when you had a a box, you know, You know, folks would call it a youth name box that God about box with, You know, as much security as you could push into a finite amount of appliance unified threat management function. Usually what would end up happening the old way was, you know, you would, you would you would have some basic security capabilities. Maybe it was. It's a traditional DMC that Thoma alluded to. You know, there's a firewall, there's an I. P s. There's some Web proxy capabilities and and that that was the that was the journey that a customer had, you know, So they would replicate this box and all those various locations. Or in the case of Nestle, before the scaler, they had those Dems es in four locations around the world, right? And the moment security, security keeps changing, right, the threat landscape keeps adopting. I mean, today, within disease killer cloud, we provide over 125,000 updates everyday, right? That's how dynamic security is. And so because the threat keeps changing, usually one of the things that vendors will try and do is add more security to that existing appliance. Right? So you're trying to make sure that a customer bottom appliance on, they need to make sure that they recoup the full investment. Let's add a little more security to it. Let's add a little more security to it so that I can keep up with the latest threats. Well, the problem with that is, when you have a finite amount of horsepower within the appliance, the performance starts to drop. And so usually that was the trade off that enterprises were making. With the security now being in the cloud right, And this idea that you're in the way, you sort of have infinite compute. Uh, you are now decoupling security from those those branch devices that Tom just alluded to. I mean, that 8000 boxes, right? One of the key points of a sassy framework that Tom alluded to is a very lightweight branch. And that's the piece That's the North Star that I think both VM Ware and Czyz killer have had right that that that low end not not lowering but of a thin branch and let the heavy lifting whether it's on the US side from the networking standpoint, whether it's security, um, you know, as it related to Z skater. Let that heavy lifting be done in the cloud. >>Yeah, and of course, there's a lot of lot of moving parts, so it's It's might be lower in lightweight, but it's more functionality. That's what the cloud Because I get that point, by the way, that anyone in the D M Z knows that as you add more stuff in there, get more, you know, cooks in the kitchen. Nothing good comes from that. Um, Tom, I'm gonna get your thoughts for the your audience out there and your customers and your prospects. What does the Z scale of partnership mean for them? >>Well, like I said, it zone opportunity to think differently about how we build a deploy enterprise networks. This a dramatic change. Most of us have been familiar with the old model where you had a spoon. It was referring to those big heavy boxes, the VPN concentrators and at the same time, most of us have been employees of those companies on. We've had the, you know, sort of less than stellar experience of turning the VPN on, and all of a sudden interest in Internet go slow. That's that's not what we want Thio achieve, and so so having the ability to use a distributed architectures. It's being forced upon us. Everyone is distributed where they like. They like it or not, Right? And so having a distributed architecture where I can put security and quality of service network controls closer to the end user is really, really critical. And I think just as puny was saying they started with this idea of of pushing security closely on user. We started with fellow Cloud with the idea of virtual izing the network in lots of physical places. So retail locations. So you've got thousands of stores around the world. You need to deliver video and audio services into those stores with a very high quality. So we were designed to have a very light, uh, entry point, and a light interviewing can just be pure software. It could be a small box three advantage of a small boxes. It's so turnkey it's designed that totally unskilled operator can use this retail people. A store manager gets a little box in the mail. You plug it in, you know, snap to Internet cables into it, and it just works again, Put it referred to this. This is part of our value. Proposition is, you plug this thing in a zone and used all you know is the Internet just got faster. You don't have to configure proxy settings. What's my I p range? Like that stuff's? Yeah, exactly. Well, and this is so many of us are feeling it now when you have, you know, sub optimal network connections. So being able to deliver a quality and user experience, >>you know, Cove, it accelerated a lot of a lot of opportunities. Also exposes the scabs and and, you know, things that been laying around and some suboptimal projects. I mean, and everyone's gonna be doubling down on things that are working and probably, you know, putting on the back burner or killing projects that don't make sense. So, um, this is a great opportunity, and I think forces things right in you guys. Wheelhouse is so I appreciate taking the time for the last minute that we have left Tom and putting. If you don't mind, I'd love to get your thoughts real quick on what's next after cloud. Obviously, cloud brings up all these benefits you're talking about. Um, what do you guys see is what's next after cloud Tom will start with you. >>I think that the you know, the range of services that will deliver in this format is not at all limited to traditional DMC services. So thank ap. I gateways. Think about core infrastructure offerings like DNS. Pretty much everything that we used in the network can actually now be delivered as a service in software more efficiently, Um, then standing up boxes and and racking, stacking yourselves. And so our view is that that cove, it has killed the appliance once and for all. And that's broadly. That's not just at the at the edge. That's in the core of the data center, things like load balancers. They're all moving to software with scale out scale out infrastructure software running on X 86 on DE. So I think that change of that magnitude will still take a while to roll out. But it's happening, >>Cove. It killed appliance. That's the headline right there. Love that. Put it after cloud. What's next? >>Well, you know, I'll say this job very similar to what Tom just mentioned. I think we're in the early innings, you know, when we would talk to our customers about transforming the network and adapting to this new normal. You know, we had some early adopters, but there was still a fair number of people that was skeptical and that loved their appliances. Covert has changed a lot of that. And so we have seen, in general acceleration of the business. The market is moving in our direction, and we feel that with this partnership you have to market leaders coming together. Right? VM ware on the networking side on the cloud networking side on the data center z scaler as it relates to cloud security user base security. This idea that we are a zero trust exchange that allows users to connect your applications to the Internet in a safe manner and at scale. That's the beauty off. You know, this'll, uh, partnership that we have brought together. And we are hopeful that customers will embrace it with confidence. And I'm mindful that we're in the early innings. >>Great points, gentlemen. Awesome stuff, great insights. And I think the cloud native integration shows that people in the ecosystem is evolving to be cloud native toe have these kinds of integrations these value points physical virtualization. Tom. Great point. I mean, we're not in face to face, but we're here. Virtually the The Cube is gonna be virtual. It's suffered to find operations. The world has changed. I think everyone is now seeing it. Thanks for the insight. And congratulations, Tom. On the news putting. Thank congratulations on the partnership with VM. Where sounds like it's great for customers looking forward to digging in. Thanks for your time. Appreciate it. Okay. That's the cube coverage here. We're in Palo Alto, California. We're in the Bay Area, but this is the emerald virtual. We're not in person, but we're virtual. I'm showing for your host for coverage of the emerald 2020. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube with digital coverage of VM 20 brought to you by VM Ware and its ecosystem partners. What's the hard news and has that relate to all this? the reliability, the performance that you get when you're on the corporate network Put it, Talk about the partnership with VM where we've been following see scaler for a long time. analogy the CIA off Nestle, you know, when he first deployed, uh, Oh, campus connecting networks drive to the airport as you mentioned, the great analogy there, and break up of the video, and you know, that's that's a problem that This software, I mean, you know, Web Zoom, they build their entire application to manage these And how do you integrate it all? Yeah, you know, obviously, Zoom and WebEx companies are, you know, this is court or what they and I want to create the nirvana that you laid out, which is access anywhere. maybe the appliance has a, you know, a limited amount the old way, because you what you just laid out was, you know, dynamic provisioning, setting up connections, Well, the problem with that is, when you have a finite amount of horsepower you add more stuff in there, get more, you know, cooks in the kitchen. Thio achieve, and so so having the ability to use a distributed architectures. and everyone's gonna be doubling down on things that are working and probably, you know, I think that the you know, the range of services that will deliver in this format is not That's the headline right there. I think we're in the early innings, you know, when we would talk to our customers about transforming people in the ecosystem is evolving to be cloud native toe have these kinds of integrations these
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nestle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Gala | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VM Ware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New Jersey | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Z Scaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tom Gillis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Punit Minocha | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
8000 boxes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Bay Area | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
150 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one customer | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Four airports | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Thoma | PERSON | 0.98+ |
8000 devices | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Xbox Live | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
over 125,000 updates | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VM Ware | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
OSHA | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
8000 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
more than 8000 boxes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Colvin | PERSON | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
over 200 points | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cove | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
four major international airports | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
WebEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
VM | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Zoom | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Two great companies | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
North Star | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
over a decade ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
Leighton | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.92+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.88+ |
Maney | PERSON | 0.87+ |
Web Zoom | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Zscaler | PERSON | 0.85+ |
Wheelhouse | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
thousands of stores | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Cube virtual | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.81+ |
both ends | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
DMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Czyz | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
point A | OTHER | 0.78+ |
Land E | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
Amit Sinha, Zscaler | CUBEConversations, January 2020
(funk music) (funk music) (funk music) (funk music) >> Hello and welcome to theCUBE studios in Palo Alto, California for another CUBE conversation where we go in-depth with thought leaders driving innovation across the tech industry. I'm your host, Peter Burris. Every enterprise is responding to the opportunities of cloud with significant changes in people, process, how they think about technology, how they're going to align technology overall with their business and with their business strategies. Now those changes are affecting virtually every aspect of business but especially every aspect of technology. Especially security. So what does it mean to envision a world in which significant new classes of services are being provided through cloud mechanisms and modes, but you retain and in fact, even enhance the quality of security that your enterprise can utilize. To have that conversation, we're joined today by a great guest, Amit Sinha is president and CTO at Zscaler. Amit, welcome back to theCUBE. >> Thank you Peter, it's a pleasure to be here. >> So before we get into it, what's new at Zscaler? >> Well, at Zscaler our mission is to make the internet and cloud a secure place for businesses and as I engage with our global 2000 customers and prospects, they are going through some of the digital transformation challenges that you just alluded to. Specifically for security, what is happening is that they had a lot of applications that were sitting in a data center or in their headquarters and that center of gravity is now moving to the cloud. They probably adopt their Office 365, and Box, and Salesforce, and these applications have moved out. Now in addition, the users are everywhere. They're accessing those services, not just from offices but also from their mobile devices and home. So if your users have left the building, and your applications are no longer sitting in your data center, that begs that question: Where should the security stack be? You know, it cannot be your legacy security appliances that sat in your DMZ and your IT closets. So that's the challenge that we see out there, and Zscaler is helping these large global organizations transform their security and network for a more mobile and a cloud-first world. >> Distributed world? So let me make sure I got this right. So basically, cause I think I totally agree with you >> Right. >> Just to test it, that many regarded the cloud as a centralization strategy. >> Correct. >> What we really see happening, is we're seeing enterprises more distribute their data, more distribute their processing, but they have not updated how they think about security so the presumption is, "yeah we're going to put more processing data out closer to the action but we're going to backhaul a whole bunch back to our security model," and what I hear you saying is no, you need to push those security services out to where the data is, out to where the process, out to where the user is. Have I got that right? >> You have nailed it, right. Think of it this way, if I'm a large global 2000 organization, I might have thousands of branches. All of those branches, traditionally, have used a hub-and-spoke network model. I might have a branch here in Palo Alto but my headquarters is in New York. So now I have an MPLS circuit connecting this branch to New York. If my Exchange server and applications and SAP systems are all there, then that hub-and-spoke model made sense. I am in this office >> Right. >> I connect to those applications and all my security stack is also there. But fast forward to today, all of those applications are moving and they're not just in one cloud. You know, you might have adopted Salesforce.com for CRM, you might have adopted Workday, you might have adopted Office 365. So these are SaaS services. Now if I'm sitting here in Palo Alto, and if I have to access my email, it makes absolutely no sense for me to VPN back to New York only to exit to the internet right there. What users want is a fast, nimble user experience without security coming in the way. What organizations want is no compromise in their security stack. So what you really need is a security stack that follows the user wherever they are. >> And the data. >> And the data, so my data...you know Microsoft has a front-door service here in Redwood City and if if you are a user here and trying to access that, I should be able to go straight with my entire security stack right next to it. That's what Gartner is calling SASE these days. >> Well, let's get into that in a second. It almost sounds as though what you're suggesting is that the enterprise needs to look at security as a SaaS service itself. >> 100 percent. If your users are everywhere and if your applications are in the cloud, your security better be delivered as a consistent "as-a-service," right next to where the users are and hopefully co-located in the same data center as where the applications are present so the only way to have a pervasive security model is to have it delivered in the cloud, which is what Zscaler has been doing from day one. >> Now, a little spoiler alert for everybody, Zscaler's been talking about this for 10-plus years. >> Right. >> So where are we today in the market place starting to recognize and acknowledge this transformation in the basic security architecture and platform that we're going through? >> I'm very excited to see that the market is really adopting what Zscaler has been talking about for over a decade. In fact, recently, Gartner released a paper titled "SASE," it stands for Secure Access Service Edge and there are, I believe, four principal tenets of SASE. The first one, of course, is that compute and security services have to be right at the edge. And we talked about that. It makes sense. >> For where the service is being delivered. >> You can't backhaul traffic to your data center or you can't backhaul traffic to Google's central data center somewhere. You need to have compute capabilities with things like SSL Interception and all the security services running right at the edge, connecting users to applications in the shortest path, right? So that's sort of principle number one of SASE. The second principle that Gartner talks about, which again you know, has been fundamental to Zscaler's DNA, is to keep your devices and your branch offices light. Don't shove too much complexity from a security perspective on the user devices and your branches. Keep it simple. >> Or the people running those user devices >> Absolutely >> in the branches >> Yeah, so you know, keep your branch offices like a light router, that forwards traffic to the cloud, where the heavy-lifting is done. >> Right. >> The third principle they talk about is to deliver modern security, you need to have a proxy-based architecture and essentially what a proxy architecture allows you to do is to look at content, right? Gone are the days where you could just say, stop a website called "evil.com" and allow a website "good.com," right? It's not like that anymore. You have to look at content, you know. You might get malware from a Google Drive link. You can't block Google now, right? So looking at SSL-encrypted content is needed and firewalls just can't do it. You have to have a proxy architecture that can decrypt SSL connections, look at content, provide malware services, provide policy-based access control services, et cetera and that's kind of the third principle. And finally what Gartner talks about is SASE has to be cloud-native, it has to be, sort of, born and bred in the cloud, a true multitenant, cloud-first architecture. You can't take, sort of, legacy security appliances and shove it in third-party infrastructure like AWS and GCP and deliver a cloud service and the example I use often is, just because you had a great blu-ray player or a DVD player in your home theater, you can't take 100,000 of these and shove it into AWS and become a Netflix. You really need to build that service from the ground up. You know, in a multitenant fashion and that's what we have done for security as a service through the cloud. >> So we are now, the market seems to be kind of converging on some of the principles that Zscaler's been talking about for quite some time. >> Right. >> When we think about 2020, how do you anticipate enterprises are going to respond as a consequence of this convergence in acknowledging that the value proposition and the need are starting to come together? >> Absolutely, I think we see the momentum picking up in the market, we have lots of conversations with CIO's who are going through this digital transformation journey, you know transformation is hard. There's immune response in big organizations >> Sure. >> To change. Not much has changed from a security and network architecture perspective in the last two decades. But we're seeing more and more of that. In fact, over 400 of global 2000 organizations are 100 percent deployed on Zscaler. And so that momentum is picking up and we see a lot of traction with other prospects who are beginning to see the light, as we say it. >> Well as you start to imagine the relationship between security and data, between security and data, one of the things that I find interesting is many respects to cloud, especially as it becomes more distributed, is becoming better acknowledged almost as a network of services. >> Right. >> As opposed to AWS as a data center here and that makes it a cloud data center. >> Right. >> It really is this network of services, which can happen from a lot of different places, big cloud service providers, your own enterprise, partners providing services to you. How does the relationship between Zscaler and kind of an openness >> Hm-mm. >> Going to come together? Hm-mm. >> So that you can provide services from a foreign enterprise to the enterprise's partners, customers, and others that the enterprise needs to work with. >> That's a great question, Peter and I think one of the most important things I tell our customers and prospects is that if you look at a cloud-delivered security architecture, it better embrace some of the SASE principles. One of the first things we did when we built the Zscaler platform was to distribute it across 150 data centers. And why did we do that? We did that because when a user is going to destinations, they need to be able to access any destination. The destination could be on Azure, could be on AWS, could be Salesforce, so by definition, it has to be carrier-neutral, it has to be cloud-neutral. I can't build a service that is designed for all internet traffic in a GCP or AWS, right. So how did we do that? We went and looked at one of the world's best co-location facilities that provide maximum connectivity options in any given region. So in North America, we might be in an Equinix facility and we might use tier one ISPs like GTT and Zayo that provide excellent connectivity to our customers and the destinations they want to visit. When you go to China, there's no GCP there, right so we work with China Unicom and China Telecom. When we are in India, we might work with an Airtel or a Sify, when we are in Australia, we might be working with Telstra. So we work with, you know, world class tier one ISPs in best data centers that provide maximum connectivity options. We invested heavily in internet exchange connectivity. Why? Because once you come to Zscaler, you've solved the physics problem by building the data center close to you, the next thing is, you want quickly go to your application. You don't want security to be in the way >> Right. >> Of application access. So with internet exchange connectivity, we are peered in a settlement-free way or BGP with Microsoft, with Akamai, with Apple, with Yahoo, right. So we can quickly get you to the content while delivering the full security stack, right? So we had to really take no shortcuts, back to your point of the world is very diverse and you cannot operate in a walled garden of one provider anymore and if you really build a cloud platform that is embracing some of the SASE principles we talked about, you have to do it the hard way. By building this one data center at a time. >> Well, you don't want your servicers to fall down because you didn't put the partnerships in place >and hardend them Correct. >> As much as you've hardened some of the other traffic. So as we think about kind of, where this goes, what do you envision Zscaler's, kind of big customer story is going to be in 2020 and beyond? Obviously, the service is going to be everywhere, change the way you think about security, but how, for example, is the relationship between the definition of the edge and the definition of the secure service going to co-evolve? Are people going to think about the edge differently as they start to think more in terms of a secure edge or where the data resides and the secure data, what do you think? >> Let's start off with five years and go back, right? >> We're going forward. >> Work our way back. Well, five years from now, hopefully everyone is on a 5G phone, you know, with blazing-fast internet connections, on devices that you love, your applications are everywhere, so now think of it from an IT perspective. You know, my span of control is becoming thinner and thinner, right? my users are on devices that I barely control. My network is the internet that I really don't control. My applications have moved to the cloud or either hosted in third-party infrastructure or run as a SaaS application, which I really don't control. Now, in this world, how do I provide security? How do I provide user experience? Imagine if you are the CIO and your job is to make all of this work, where will you start, right? So those are some of the big problems that we are helping our customers with. So this-- >> Let me as you a question 'cause here's where I was going with the question. I would start with, if I can't control all these things, I'm going to apply my notion of security >> Hm-mm. >> And say I am going to control that which is within >> Right. >> my security boundaries, not at a perimeter level, not at a device level, but at a service level. >> Absolutely and that's really the crux of the Zscaler platform service. We build this Zero Trust architecture. Our goal is to allow users to quickly come to Zscaler and Zscaler becomes the policy engine that is securely connecting them to all the cloud services that they want to go to. Now in addition, we also allow the same users to connect to internal applications that might have required a traditional VPN. Now think of it this way, Peter. When you connect to Google today, do you VPN to Google's network? To access Gmail? No. Why should you have to VPN to access an internal application? I mean, you get a link on your mobile phone, you click on it and it didn't work because it required a separate form of network access. So with Zscaler Internet Access and Zscaler Private Access, we are delivering a beautiful service that works across 150 data centers. Users connect to the service and the service becomes a policy engine that is securely connecting you to the destinations that you want. Now, in addition, you asked about what's going to happen in a couple of years. The same service can be extended for partners. I'm a business, I have hundreds of partners who want to connect to me. Why should I allow legacy VPN access or private circuits that expose me? I don't even know who's on the other end of the line, right? They come onto my network and you hear about the Target breaches because some HVAC contract that had unrestricted access, you hear about the Airbus breach because another contract that had access. So how do we build a true Zero Trust cloud platform that is securely allowing users, whether it's your employees, to connect to named applications that they should, or your partners that need access to certain applications, without putting them on the network. We're decoupling application access from network access. And there's one final important linchpin in this whole thing. Remember we talked about how powerless organizations >> Right. >> feel in this distributed model? Now imagine, your job is to also ensure that people are having a good user experience. How will you do that, right? What Zscaler is trying to do now is, we've been very successful in providing the secure and policy-based connectivity and our customers are asking us, hey, you're sitting in between all of this, you have visibility into what's happening on the user's device. Clearly you're sitting in the middle in the cloud and you see what's happening on the left-hand side, what's happening on the right-hand side. You know, you have the cloud effect, you can see there's a problem going on with Microsoft's network in the China region, right? Correlate all of that information and give me proactive intelligence around user experience and that's what we launched recently at Zenith Live. We call it Zscaler Digital Experience, >> Hmm. >> So overall the goal of the platform is to securely connect users and entities to named applications with Zero Trust principles. We never want security and user experience to be orthogonal requirements that has traditionally been the case. And we want to provide great user experience and visibility to our customers who've started adopting this platform. >> That's a great story. It's a great story. So, once again, I want to thank you very much for coming in and that's Amit Sinha, who is the president and CTO at Zscaler, focusing a lot on the R&D types of things that Zscaler's doing. Thanks again for being on theCUBE. >> It's my pleasure, Peter. Always enjoy talking to you. >> And thanks for joining us for another CUBE conversation. I'm Peter Burris, see you next time. (funk music) (funk music)
SUMMARY :
Every enterprise is responding to the opportunities and that center of gravity is now moving to the cloud. I totally agree with you Just to test it, that many regarded the cloud our security model," and what I hear you saying is connecting this branch to New York. and if I have to access my email, and if if you are a user here is that the enterprise needs to look at security and hopefully co-located in the same data center Zscaler's been talking about this for 10-plus years. have to be right at the edge. is to keep your devices and your branch offices light. Yeah, so you know, keep your branch You have to look at content, you know. kind of converging on some of the principles that in the market, we have lots of conversations with and we see a lot of traction Well as you start to imagine the relationship and that makes it a cloud data center. and kind of an openness Going to come together? that the enterprise needs to work with. the next thing is, you want quickly go to your application. of the world is very diverse and you cannot operate Well, you don't want your servicers to fall down So as we think about kind of, where this goes, on devices that you love, your applications are everywhere, I'm going to apply my notion of security my security boundaries, not at a perimeter level, to the destinations that you want. and you see what's happening on the left-hand side, is to securely connect users and entities to So, once again, I want to thank you very much for coming in Always enjoy talking to you. I'm Peter Burris, see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Amit Sinha | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Yahoo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Telstra | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Airbus | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
January 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Redwood City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Akamai | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
150 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
100 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GTT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
China Telecom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sify | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Zayo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
SASE | TITLE | 0.99+ |
China Unicom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amit | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second principle | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third principle | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Office 365 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
10-plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Airtel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | PERSON | 0.99+ |
over 400 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.96+ |
Equinix | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
2000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Gmail | TITLE | 0.96+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.95+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
over a decade | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one provider | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Larry Biagini, Zscaler | CUBEConversation, October, 2019
>> From the SiliconANGLE Media office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE. Now, here's your host Stu Miniman. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman and welcome to a Cube Conversation here in our Boston area studio. Happy to welcome to our program a first time guest, Larry Biagini, who is the Chief Technology Evangelist at Zscaler. Also had a long career at GE. Your last position there you were the Chief Technology Officer. Larry thanks so much for joining me, pleasure to me you. >> Thanks for having us. All right so you know before we get into some of your background at GE tell us a little bit... Zscaler, we've got some familiarity with the team. We've had some of the executives, many of the customers on our program. Tell us what part you do at Zscaler. >> So when I left GE after about 26 years, I was a Zscaler customer. Very early Zscaler customer at GE. And one of the things that intrigued me about GE and one of the things about Zscaler I learned with working with them is that they're vision for security and my vision for security and agility of organizations going forward were an easy match. That made a transition very simple, I was gone from GE for four weeks, that was my retirement before I got recruited into Zscaler and the reason it was a good match is I had big company experience. I had a very good network of people that are operating in large companies and Zscaler needed those connections. But we also had a product that was mature but we had a message that we had to get across to these folks. So it was a message that was real to me, a message that mattered to what Zscaler need to put out there, and that's why I'm the Chief Technology Evangelist. I spend my time with customers, with prospects. Just understanding what they're going through. Using my experience at GE and my experience with other customers to help them through that, and that's the role that I play. >> Yeah I know my time when I worked on the vendor side working with customers being in briefing centers working with them were some of the most gratifying for me. Cause it was you know helping them through what they were working on. Bring a C.E.O. in -- you no longer work for GE but give us a little bit of the background as to you know what gave you some of the skills and some of the scars to help customers that are now going through these journeys. >> The story really starts when I was asked to become the Chief Risk Officer for IT for GE. I was the CIO of the largest business at the time. But GE was going through a transformation or wanted to go through a transformation. They recognized that digital was an opportunity for them and could also be a threat, but at the same time security was not enabling the organization it was sort of disabling it. It was in the way. Now I had no security background at the time it was mostly in architecture and applications. I'd run the data centers but I was very familiar with security and what it was supposed to do and what it actually was doing. So one of the first things we looked at is why we were doing what we were doing. And the reality is ten years ago it made sense doing what we were doing which was protecting the network because everything was in the network. The users were in the network, the data was in the network, The applications were in the network and if you protect the network by definition or by default you're protecting everything else. But when we started seeing behaviors that's not the way people were acting. There was more and more traffic going directly to internet. Whether it be for personal use or for business use more and more business use. The mobile workforce and I just don't mean mobile devices the workforce itself was mobile, where we were out in the field. That's where you make money, it's when you're with customers, when you're selling. So this notion of protecting the network allows you to protect apps, users, and data actually is a fallacy. But we continue to do it because that was the problem we had to solve ten, fifteen years ago. The problem changed with the introduction of cloud, with the introduction of mobility. With end users getting much much smarter about how they can use technology without actually needing IT. You know we used to say that everybody's their own CIO at this point. They have their own devices they have their own networks, they have their own apps. Our job is still to secure them but not get in the way of them. >> Yeah we know back in the old days it was physical things that I could wrap my arms around and if I could lock a door, or you know build the moat as we talked about in the industry, that was great but the surface area just keeps increasing. Cloud pushed it that way. Edge is pushing it you know order of magnitudes even more. So it's interesting I think you know when we talked about cloud adoption, security was originally "Oh it's a reason why I might not go to the cloud," and then it was like "Wait, its a new opportunity for it." To be honest digital transformations I haven't heard as much discussion about thee challenges and opportunity's of security there so maybe you can help expand on that a bit. >> So I think what Zscaler does and the notion that I had that made it an easy fit was I always believed or not always believed after I took that role I believed that there had to be something between the user and whereever they wanted to go and we had to put as many services as we could in that. Now we originally thought we could build that ourselves. We couldn't. We didn't have the footprint, we didn't have the scale, even though were a large company at the time. But I always thought that tying a user and a application to a location was a big mistake. And so when I think about digital transformation what I'm really thinking about is safely attaining speed in order to do business in today's world. So you talked about devices. I'd argue that even five years ago most larger organizations could not tell the devices on their network yet we were trying to protect that. Right? They knew the ones they knew about but they didn't know the Raspberry Pi that was plugged in by an engineering guy. Or they didn't know that somebody just put a new machine on the factory floor and it happened to have an IP address. So we were actually kidding ourselves into what we were doing. So I think the cloud actually opened up the eyes of not only the business but opened up the eyes of the IT and security folks that the way -- you can't control the network anymore because you don't own the network -- I'd argue that you haven't for a long time -- and because of that things had to change. I also think that it became -- and I've seen this in my four years with Zscaler -- four years ago security was sort of black and white. Now that the dialogue has changed and more about risk what's really important to my company. The fact of matter is have to admit to my board that I can't protect everything. But I need to protect certain things but you have to tell me what those things are. I can mitigate that risk. I can't do everything to everybody and so I think that's the discussion people are having now. And when in five years ago people would say "Oh Amazon, Azure, GCP, I want to see their security practices, this, that, and the other thing." Now they can't stop things from moving there. They're less concerned about the security practices because they get an attestation of those and things like that. They're more concerned about how their organizations are migrating stuff. Are they migrating the right data? Do they have the right controls around it? So I think the mindset of the CISOs has changed a bit I think the roles of CIO, the CTO, and the CISO have changed. Where the CISO is more risk-averse, The CTO is actually learning how to tie things together rather than build them. And the CIO is focused on data and business opportunities. >> Yeah, Larry maybe you can bring us inside one of the customers or you know a sample of what you're hearing from customers because so many of the things you said really resonate absolutely five years ago was like Cloud, let me get your SLA and let me read trough all of it, and hey can you adjust this for me? Amazon says no. Okay wait I need to adjust to this, but the mantra I hear from my friends in security is security is everyone's responsibility and it is a practice and therefore it needs to be embedded in there not some product or thing that gets bolted on at the end. So how are they coming to that? Is it the CISO? Organizationally, where do these conversations start and fit? >> So every organization is different, so what I'll give you is a sort of combined view of a large organization. Probably two or three large organizations. The first step is adopting the internet as your corporate network. Once you come to that realization that the internet is your corporate network and will continue to be so, then the things that you do change dramatically. And the opportunities that you have change dramatically: from a cost perspective, from a service-delivery perspective, and from an end-user satisfaction perspective. >> So let me ask that for a second, because I have you know, some peers and friends that work at big companies and it feels like there's the corporate network and then I've got my device on the other thing that I use, the public network. Is this embracing the just, "it's there," or do I still have those two separate networks? >> I think where it's going and where the more progressive companies that I deal with are, is that rather than having a corporate network supporting everything, the corporate network will actually shrink. The...only supporting what it needs to support, and will become a destination just like an AWS, or an Azure or GCP. So if you have a corporate network today that's big and wide and flat, it has users, apps, data in it, and your data centers, my view and dealing with, again, some more of the progressive companies is that corporate network will shift to just a data-center network. And it will have no users on it but users will be able to get to it. So you turn yourself into an AWS. Some people call that Hybrid Computing. I call it Hybrid Networking. But the reality is most organizations, large organizations are going to have a hard time getting rid of their data centers in the near future. So they're going to have to be part of this game. And rather than try to extend the current model to wrap around AWS and Azure and the cloud providers, why not change your model what you do control to actually act like that. So my world has the internet as a corporate network, the corporate network as a subset of the internet, no users on the corporate network, all users untrusted on the internet. That's where I think this whole thing goes and that's where the customers that I talk to are headed. >> Okay one of the biggest challenges when you talk about this transformation is usually some of the organizational dynamics there. Maybe walk us through...you talked about we understand everyone's different you know we've seen the CISO greatly elevated to where their role fits into it but you know corporate structure and the average sysadmin and the like, what are they getting rid of, what are they learning, or is it new people coming in? >> The cultural -- I don't want to say "push back" -- but the cultural challenges are real. You know if you've been in this industry... ...I've been in this industry for forty years. You gain certain expertise and you like to get promoted on that expertise, get recognized for that expertise and it's comfortable to deal in that area. So just think if you're a network admin. You know Cisco equipment. You know it really well. You know your Cisco rep really well. And all of this stuff is second nature to you. Now you're asked to tie it, put up a connection between yourself and AWS, a VPC because you're going to move applications out there. And really, you're not a network guy anymore. You are a design guy to help move applications to the cloud. And it's an uncomfortable space to be in. So you can sort of, there's a couple options. You could say, this too shall pass. (And it won't.) That's I think, a losing proposition. I think you can move to a network provider and say, "Look, I'm still a network guy I can do networking." Or you're going to have to find a way to take the skills that you have and the mindset that you have and work in this new environment. Now that's not easy to do and one of the things that some of the large organizations I deal with are doing is they're bringing in people who grew up in this area and they're trying to seed the education of their own people. Because they're good people right? They know the culture, they know the business. They just don't have the skills that they need today so going to training's not going to help them. Doing it by example with people who've done it before is very important. >> All right how about outcomes? Is there anything you can share from your GE experiences or some of the customers you're working through as to kind that high level of what this means now you know is there a success finish line? Or is it a continuing journey? >> I think the success finish line is actually doing what you're supposed to do for the organization without actually anybody knowing it. Not being in the way. So from my perspective its end users or be they customers, suppliers, internal people, being able to do their job in a frictionless manner but you being able to do your job and the security side is protecting them and the network side, it's making sure they're getting the best user experience out there. And the CIO side is that they're using the best tools for the job. That's it for me. I'm tired, and I have been tired and I don't think it's right for the people that we provide technology or technology solutions to choose our technology as a last technology of choice. But they'd really like to use something else? We should give them that flexibility if it meets the risk appetite of the organization. So to me it's end user satisfaction is the most important thing because that allows you to do your job. Dissatisfied users will always find a way around whatever you put in their way. And that's not good for them, not good for the organization. So that's it for me. >> Great you've been now with Zscaler for four years, tell what's changed in the landscape. Security? You said to board-level discussion absolutely, something we hear, comment I've made is it went from kind of top of mind, bottom of budget, to, you know, no, this is something that actually you're not going to put it off for another quarter or year, you're going to take care of it now. >> So I actually think it's kind of counter-intuitive, what changed...is that I believe that five years ago, security was top of mind and there was a boatload of money thrown at it and that money got spent but nobody was able to prove that they were any more secure than the next guy. The metrics weren't there. I mean if you can't define what your network is, how can you stand in front of your board and say my network is... And so I think there's been a questioning of, are we spending enough on security but not only enough, are we spending it the right areas? Because what we've been doing sort of doesn't make me feel any better. You know, sure we meet our regulatory requirements but that's compliance, that's not security. So I think people are actually questioning, are we doing the right things for the business that we're in today versus the business that we were in in the past? And do we have the right conversation going with the board? Versus a red-yellow-green chart about here's how we think we're secure. And I think that's made a big difference. And I also think the discussion around where information resides and how important that information is and then ultimately how well you mitigate any risk to it, is the most relevant conversation that happens today. It's not, I'm not going to ignore ransomware and things like that but its not "Oh my God I'm getting attacked a million times a day." It's "Do I have something that's of value to somebody else and it will kill me as an organization or hurt me drastically if I lose it." And if I don't know where it is I'm probably going to lose it. Either deliberately or by mistake. So do I have those right controls in place? >> Yeah I'd love to get your commentary, there are certain companies out there that they have the message, you know, security's broken, we need a do-over, you know, the latest- -and-greatest software-defined cloud-based something or other isn't going to solve it, but you know, you've been in this space for decades, so you know where are we as a industry with security today, you feel that we're making progress? Sounds like it. >> I do feel that we're making progress. I think as an industry we recognize that the problem exists, and the problem that exists today is different from the problem that is existed seven, eight, ten, even fifteen years ago, that's number one. Number two is the competitive landscape of companies out that are huge today versus the companies that were huge ten years ago. It's a much different landscape. And these are all what I would call digital companies. They found a way to use information. You know things like Airbnb. It's an information business is all it is. And it's not a Marriott, it's not a Hilton, but it's a competitor to those guys. And I think that's a realization that business are having and that's filtering down into the IT organizations. You know ,we see a lot of companies -- which I don't necessarily agree with -- hiring Chief Digital Officers in addition to Chief Information Officers. And I see that as a bifurcation of the CIO as a back-room office guy and the CDO now is customer-facing. I think this whole thing has to be customer-facing and take advantage of the tools that are out there whether you provide them or whether you get them from somebody else, in a secure and safe enough manner that your business feels comfortable operating. So that's what's changed, I don't think it's...even the hardcore security guys, you know, we've had a lot of breaches in the past. Every one of those breaches, everyone had a firewall, everyone had a proxy. Everybody had all the tools that everybody else had and nobody could prevent those breaches. I think the fact of the matter is you want to prevent the harm of a breach occurring versus spending all your time making sure your breach doesn't occur. So I think that's a different mindset. >> Larry, I want to give you the final word. We've been going through this series of the digial cloud transformation, give us your final take away. >> So I don't like digital transformation as a word I think it's been overused. I think businesses are changing and adapting to what the opportunities and risks are today. With that, the whole organization has to face into that and say "This is where we can win, this is where we have to be good enough, and this is what's dragging us down." And they have to address all of them. I think in order to do that, one thing that an IT organization has to do is head-on, face its legacy debt. You can't play in this world with legacy debt. And if you don't start now, five years from now you're still going to be complaining about it. It's like that old, you know, Chinese proverb, when was the best time to plant a tree? One hundred years ago. When's the second best time? Today. If you don't address your legacy with your board head-on, your business will lose. That's number one. Number two is, don't go it alone. Get the talent who's done this before. This is not moving from, you know, from Cobalt, to C, to C++. This isn't an incremental change. Fundamentally the way that the cloud works in a way that your corporate network will work once its the internet, is fundamentally different than anything we've done before. Take advantage of people who've done it. Use that to seed your organization's growth. And then finally, there's no stopping this train. There's nothing that's going to happen cataclysmically that's going to stop this. On the other hand don't throw out the baby with the bath water, because most organizations as I said earlier are still going to have legacy applications in their data center. Just make them look as if they're modern applications, and it's a win for everybody. >> Larry Biagini, thank you so much for sharing all of your history and your customers' journeys. >> Thanks for having me. >> All right and thank you as always for watching theCUBE, I'm Stu Miniman. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
From the SiliconANGLE Media office you were the Chief Technology Officer. All right so you know before we get into some of your And one of the things that intrigued me about GE Cause it was you know helping them through So one of the first things we looked at is So it's interesting I think you know when we talked about But I need to protect certain things but you have to because so many of the things you said really resonate And the opportunities that you have change dramatically: let me ask that for a second, because I have you know, So if you have a corporate network today Okay one of the biggest challenges when you talk about I think you can move to a network provider and say, "Look, And the CIO side is that they're using the best tools bottom of budget, to, you know, no, this is something that I mean if you can't define what your network is, or other isn't going to solve it, but you know, you've been And I see that as a bifurcation of the CIO as Larry, I want to give you the final word. I think businesses are changing and adapting to what Larry Biagini, thank you so much for sharing all of your All right and thank you as always for watching
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Justin Warren | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjay Poonen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Clarke | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Floyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Volante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Diane Greene | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michele Paluso | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sam Lightstone | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dan Hushon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Teresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kevin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Armstrong | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kevin Sheehan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Leandro Nunez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NVIDIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NetApp | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Keith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bob Metcalfe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Larry Biagini | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brendan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Clarke Patterson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jay Chaudhry, Zscaler | CUBEConversation, July 2019
(upbeat music) >> Narrator: From our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, this is a CUBE conversation. >> Hello and welcome to theCUBE studios in Palo Alto, California for another CUBE conversation, where we go in-depth with thought leaders driving innovation across the tech industry. I'm today's host, Peter Burris. Every business is talking about cloud transformation as a consequence of their effort to do a better job with digital business transformation. But cloud transformation too often is associated with just thinking about moving applications and data to some as yet undefined location. Whatever approach enterprises take, they will absolutely have to touch upon a couple of crucial steps along the way. At the center of those steps will be how do we think about the network transformation that's going to be required to achieve and attain our cloud objectives? How do we do it? Well to have that conversation, we're here today with Jay Chaudhry who's a CEO of Zscaler. Jay, welcome to theCUBE, welcome back to theCUBE. >> Thank you. >> So before we get into this very important conversation, give us an update on Zscaler. >> So Zscaler was designed as a cloud security platform for the world of cloud and mobility. When applications are in the cloud, users are everywhere, the traditional security that builds a castle and moat model no longer works. So I start with clean slate, 11 years ago to start this company. Today, some of the largest companies in the world are protected by Zscaler. We went public last year, on NASDAQ, the sales have done very well, our customers are very happy our employees are very happy, so we are having fun building this lasting company and making cloud and internet a safe place to do business. >> Now that's great. Now let's talk about that, 'cause you're talking to a lot of customers, about making the internet a safe place to do business. >> Yep. >> What are you encountering as you discuss their challenges? >> So with the mobility, with the desire to do digital transformation, CIOs and CTOs and CISOs, are trying to figure out, how do I get there? The biggest thing that's holding them back, is security. It's a new thing for them. If my data is sitting in the cloud somewhere, who is protecting it? How do my users access it while the bad guys don't? So security ends up being at the center of the whole discussion. In fact a few years ago, CISOs would talk to me and say, "Security is not getting enough attention, "it's being ignored." Now the same CISOs are complaining a little bit that I'm being asked to present to the board every quarter. >> Right >> So it's a good thing but the CISOs have a challenge of figuring out what solutions work for the cloud, what do not, because quite often, when the market changes, the incumbents, the legacy vendors, kind of whitewash the solutions overnight and everyone becomes a cloud security provider. >> We get a lot of marketing responses, I think one of the centerpieces of this whole thing is, digital business really places an emphasis on the value of data as an asset. >> Yep. >> And how it changes the way you engage your customers, how it changes the way they think about operations, how it impacts the way you govern the overall business. >> Yep. >> When data emerges as the asset, we move away from a focus especially in the security world, from securing devices to securing the new classes of data. >> Yep. >> Is that kind of solution direction that you're seeing companies taking, is how do I think about up leveling beyond perimeter to actually building security. >> Yeah. >> Embedded deep within my workings? >> To really understand how security came about. Earlier on it used to be, I protect my device with antivirus software, then we built networks and we expected users to be on the network and applications and data to be sitting in my data center on my network. So the easiest way to secure your enterprise was, to secure the network. >> Mm. By building a moat around your data center. That's why we call it network security, securing your network, it made sense for years but now, with applications sitting in Azure or AWS Office 365, Workday, the like. And the users being everywhere, at airport, coffee shops, at home and wherever. How do you protect the network? The users aren't even on your network and applications aren't even on your network. So the notion of network security is becoming irrelevant. At the end of the day, the sole purpose of IT is, that a user should be able to access an application, no matter where the application is and no matter where the user is. So all this network and security and all, are a byproduct of that. So when I start Zscaler, I said, what needs to be protected? Data. Where is data? Data is generally sitting with the application, behind the application. So rather than building this moat, rather than doing this network security, rather than trying to build an appliance and try to move it to the cloud, let's take a look at it totally different. Assume that we need a policy engine, a business policy engine that sits in, 100s of locations around the globe, a user connects to the policy engine, the policy engine looks and says, should this user have access to this application or not? Based on that, we connect a user to an application, internal or external, no matter where the user is coming from. So that's the approach that's needed and that's the approach Zscaler pioneered and that's why the biggest of the big companies from GE, to Siemens, to DHL, they all are becoming Zscaler customers. So we are helping them transform from this old world where network is a hub-and-spoke network, security is this castle and moat to the new world, where a user can go directly to the application over any network. And network is important, it's an important transport but it doesn't need to be secure. Security is about, securing the right user to a right application, irrespective of the location of the user or the application. >> So I want to build on this because, what a lot of companies are starting to recognize is that, they want to get their application and the services provided by the application and the data proximate to the commercial activity that generates, you know, that pays the rent so to speak. >> Yep, yep. >> And that means, an increase in distribution of function offer. >> Of course. >> So the notion of the cloud as a place where we're going to centralize things, is giving way to a notion of the cloud as a technique for further distributing. >> Yes. >> And that means ultimately that, the services that we're going to provide have to have security embedded in them, in policy so that the data, the security and all those services are moving to where they're required. >> Yes, so in my view, cloud was never meant to say, things must be centralized. Actually a data centers were highly centralized. >> Right. >> The cloud notion should be, it's a responsibility of the cloud provider to make sure that data and application can be pushed where there needs to be. So when Microsoft is offering Office 365, your emails aren't sitting at one place, it's Microsoft's job to make sure if your employees are in Singapore, some of these things move to Singapore so you can have faster access to it. So that's the application side or for the data side of it. A company like Zscaler, we sit between the user and the application as a check post. In fact, think of us as an international airport. >> mm >> When you go in and out, you need to make sure that, the person is authorized to do so and isn't carrying any guns and weapons that could cause damage to somebody out there. So a user going to Salesforce or user going to Office 365 or a user going to application Azure, they simply connect with us, the business defines a policy, says, this person is okay to go here and based on then, we are connecting those people securely. Now if you're in London, you want to go through Zscaler's check post in London, if you're in Tokyo, you want to go through a check post in Tokyo because you want the shortest path. The old approach where we built a hub-and-spoke network, you brought people back to the data center. >> Back to the hub. >> To a hub, to go out. It's very painful. Imagine flying from San Fran to Chicago, via Houston? It's very painful and that's what gets done in the old world of security appliances because you can build only so many moats and that's what Zscaler is making redundant or irrelevant. So with a 100 plus locations around the globe with multi-tenant technology, you fly to Paris tomorrow, as soon as you connect to the internet from your hotel or the airport, we automatically redirect your traffic through our Paris data center. Your policy and security magically shows up, gets enforced, you're getting localized content, you're getting amazing response time without having to do anything. >> You're getting the same services that you get anywhere else 'cause it's policy driven with a common infrastructure for ensuring that-- >> And-- >> The issue of distribution is not the determining consideration. >> So it is the heavy lifting we did. >> Right. >> To make sure your policy can automatically show up where it is. And to do that, you're to build some serious technology. The old technology was, policy needs to be pushed once in a while, let's do a batch push. That's what traditional security appliances like firewalls do, they're single tenant, we came with a concept policy on demand per user, it works beautifully and then logs. Any time you go through any check post, the logs are created just like when I go in a building, they have me sign that say Jay went to see Peter at this time, same colored logs are created and they must be secured. So, you may be going to our 50 data centers but your logs are created in 50 locations but in line in real time, without ever writing the disk locally, they get sent to one central logging cluster and they're available within seconds. That's really an example of a purpose-built security cloud as compared to what we are calling imitation clouds. >> Mm >> Where people take a stack of appliances, stick them as virtual machines in Google or AWS cloud and they become a cloud service. I was talking to a customer the other day, he said hey, here was a network security vendor making a pitch and he said, "I thought of it, "as if someone is trying to build a Netflix service "using a bunch of DVD appliances." >> Mm-hmm >> All right so, to do security right, one has to build it for the world of cloud, it's multi-tenant, it's distributed, have you seen it before? Think of Salesforce.com, think of Workday, these were young companies a few years ago like Siebel used to dominate CRM. >> Right. >> PeopleSoft used to dominate HR, what happened to them? Well the world moved to its cloud, the world move to SAS service and these companies tried to use that legacy technology, tried to move to the cloud, it just doesn't work and that's why all these investors and customers love Zscaler's platform. We like to call it born in the cloud for the cloud platform. >> One of the things you didn't mention is that, when you're not doing that huge amount of backhaul traffic, your costs are going to go down pretty dramatically. So if I kind of summarize what you've talked about, we're going to go through, we're in the midst of a cloud transformation. >> Mm-hmm >> We have to rethink applications in the context of improve security, bake it right in which is going to lead to a rethinking of network and finally a rethinking of security. >> That's correct. When your network changes from hub-and-spoke to direct to cloud, you can't have a direct path without security so it drives security transformation. So that's where a security platform like Zscaler comes in. So your traffic from any of your say, X 100 branches or from your mobile device or from your laptop, it simply goes through Zscaler to get the same policy, same protection. So Zscaler gets viewed as an enabler of cloud transformation because without us, you can't transform the network and then security has to be done right. >> Right, so you've had a lot of conversations with customers, give us some sense of what kinds of how it's changing the way they work, how it's changing their operations, how it's changing their cost profiles. >> You know three, four or five years ago, we had to do a fair amount of evangelism but when you're the pioneers, you expect to do that. Like three years ago, three CIOs will tell me, "I like cloud, I'm moving in that direction." Three will say, "I'm thinking about it." And remaining four will say, "Mm-hmm I don't think cloud will happen." Today, all of them want to embrace cloud because they've seen the benefits of it. It's making business more agile, more competitive. Now they're figuring out, how do we do security right, how do I do this transformation without, if I may say, messing it up? >> Mm-hmm >> And that's where, it all starts with thought leader, visionary customers. When I saw GE, Larry Biagini, a global CTO or global CISO driving cloud eight, nine years ago, seeing Siemens saying, I need to make my business more competitive and these are the type of leaders who actually help drive adoption because when they do this stuff, others followed. >> Yeah the recode system responds. >> Exactly, exactly >> Jay Chaudhry, talking about cloud transformation and the crucial role that security is going to play in that transformation. Thanks very much for being on theCUBE. >> Peter, thank you, I appreciate the opportunity. >> And once again we've been speaking with Jay Chaudhry who's the CEO of Zscaler. Thanks for joining us for another CUBE conversation, I'm Peter Burris, see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, a couple of crucial steps along the way. So before we get into this very important conversation, When applications are in the cloud, a lot of customers, about making the internet a safe place of the whole discussion. the incumbents, the legacy vendors, on the value of data as an asset. And how it changes the way you engage your customers, When data emerges as the asset, we move away from a focus to actually building security. So the easiest way to secure your enterprise was, irrespective of the location of the user or the application. provided by the application and the data proximate And that means, an increase in distribution So the notion of the cloud as a place so that the data, the security and all those services Actually a data centers were highly centralized. So that's the application side or for the data side of it. the person is authorized to do so in the old world of security appliances the determining consideration. And to do that, you're to build some serious technology. and they become a cloud service. one has to build it for the world of cloud, Well the world moved to its cloud, One of the things you didn't mention is that, in the context of improve security, bake it right in and then security has to be done right. how it's changing the way they work, Today, all of them want to embrace cloud I need to make my business more competitive and the crucial role that security is going to play I appreciate the opportunity. And once again we've been speaking with Jay Chaudhry
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jay Chaudhry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tokyo | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Larry Biagini | PERSON | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
DHL | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Siemens | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Paris | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Chicago | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Houston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
San Fran | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
50 locations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
50 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
NASDAQ | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Office 365 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100 plus locations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
11 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
PeopleSoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ | |
three years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
four | DATE | 0.98+ |
Three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.97+ |
three CIOs | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
nine years ago | DATE | 0.96+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
three | DATE | 0.94+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Siebel | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Salesforce.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Workday | TITLE | 0.87+ |
one central | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.85+ |
100s of locations | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Salesforce | TITLE | 0.78+ |
single tenant | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
seconds | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
quarter | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
Howie Xu, Zscaler | CUBEconversation, May 2019
(upbeat jazz music) >> From our studios, in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California. This is a CUBEConversation. >> Hello everyone, welcome to this special CUBEConversation. I'm John Furrier in theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto, California. We're excited to have a great tech talk here with good friend Howie Xu, who's currently the Vice President of Machine Learning and AI at Zscaler. Formally an entrepreneur, which he sold his company Zscaler. Before that entrepreneur resident Greylock. Before that VMWare, a variety of other endeavors. Howie and I, we've known each other for a while. Great to have you come in and chat about-- >> Great to be here! >> The Zoom, Zscaler, these are the new breed modern era companies, SaaS business models. Really interesting and this is something that we were talking about on email and over text, is our topic. >> Yeah. >> Thanks for coming in. >> Great. >> So you've seen the waves at VMWare, you saw the rapid growth there. And now, you work for Zscaler which is experiencing rapid growth. You saw Zoom go public, and I just interviewed Michael Dell. We were commenting about that on text as well. He said these big markets that have big total addressable dollars associated with them are ripe for disruption. They used to have high barriers to entry in the old ways to look at it, but now with cloud and with SaaS, with data, there's different innovation speeds. This has become a big deal. Talk about your view on this. >> Well to me, when Zoom and then Zscaler founded, many years ago, no one believed that they would become this big, right? When Zoom founded, they were plenty of the conference, free even, software available out there. When Jay founded Zscaler people thought, "Well, there was enough security companies, security solutions." Clearly, they defied conventional wisdom and then they just fought on and they saw something that other people didn't see which is precisely what you were talking about. The SaaS is so different, right? The business model, the innovation speed, the data driven kind of the thing, it's so different. A lot of people say, "Hey what's the difference "between SaaS versus the convention? "Isn't that just moving that thing over to the cloud?" I actually used to think that way too, right? Isn't that just the virtual price, moving on to Amazon Cloud? After living and breathing in SaaS company and then also observing that in the VC industry as well. It's just totally different, day and night different. >> Well I wanted to get into this with you 'cause I think you bring some good perspective onto these insights and to the rocket success of say Zoom and Zscaler, but Zoom in particular, recent successful IPO. Among the recent class this past quarter. Zoom, Lyft, Uber. Zoom is standing out. They're getting profitable. This is video conferencing. You know in the old days if someone said, "Hey, I want to compete with video conferences." Well, the barriers are actually too high, but they took a very innovative approach. Cloud, data, simplicity, and the big 800 pound gorilla was the WebEx's of the world. Who was defined, divine for sharing slides, not so much pure video. (laughing) >> Yeah. >> They really innovated the focus, the speed of success. Unprecedented, in my opinion. I think this is a huge success of what the opportunities are for entrepreneurs. >> Yeah, I think on the surface, right? If you ask Eric he would tell you that, look the WebEx was designed for sharing slides, and then the Zoom was designed from ground up for video sharing, or the video conferencing, so it's very different and it requires different architecture. So that's very true. But I think there is a more fundamental to that. The more fundamental for that is, there are a few things. One is the product, the life cycle is very different. How do you approach the customer? The release cycle, the sort of the feedback loop, right? Much tighter feedback loop, much faster feedback loop between the customer and you. The release cost is much lower now as a SaaS product. So, innovation is just accelerated because it's SaaS, because it's a true SaaS. >> And this is a unique thing, you said before, SaaS isn't just lifting a on-premises workload and moving it to the cloud. It's a completely different mindset. Talk about this dynamic, because it affords new kinds of risk taking. You and I were talking about before we came on camera, share your insight on that. >> Well, you know, as kind of the traditional software you have a release cycle, you want it to have a release date, right? And then once the product is in customer hand, if you have a bug, if you have something, it's so costly to change it, right? But as a SaaS, the form factor, you can take a little bit more risk. You can even give that feature set to 10% of your audience. Not the entire set of the audience. You can do those kind of magic, so you can accelerate the innovation and as a shrink-wrapped software the traditional way. You have one shot, if that software is not good, then you are toast. >> So you can move quicker. You can push code, you don't have the on-premise dynamics. >> Yeah, the innovation and then risk taking are kind of correlated, right? Relatively more risk, the more you are willing to take risk, relatively you can take more innovation. So, that's the thing. >> Well, you and I were talking, and one of the key things that you have been talking about publicly, and amongst friends, is innovation speed. Everyone wants the innovation fever. "I got to win to innovate, digital transformation, rah rah." Easier said then done. Innovation speed is critical with cloud and SaaS, why? What's the formula there for innovation speed? >> Well, one thing we discussed, the release cycle. For a, not necessarily for Zoom and Zscaler, but you know for SaaS in general, its possible for you to have daily, weekly, monthly release. Traditional software, there is no way you can do that but that's just the release cycles of that. The other thing is, you can actually take a risk. You can say, "Hey I want you to try to raise 1% of the customer and then see how they are going to react to this." But in the traditional way you have product manager debating for six months, six years on whether or how to do things. Here, let's not debate, let's just see. >> Let's ship it. >> Right, ship it. >> And Reid Hoffman always says, "If he's not embarrassed by your first shipment then you're not doing it properly." Which begs the question, I want to get your thoughts on this because, again with VMware, you saw how early that worked and their transforming cloud is now here unlike when they started the company. What is the right way to do it? And what's the wrong way to do it? When you look at an entrepreneur or a friend, who's trying to get a business off the ground, SaaS business, when you look at what they're doing, and you look at their mechanisms and how they're organizing their team, their code. What jumps out at you as the wrong way, and what's the right way? >> Well, the, I think the coach is really it, right? You know, the kind of the coach of incremental success and the fast iteration is the culture for a SaaS company, right? For the traditional one, you cannot afford to do that, because once you make a small mistake, you are toast. So I think, you know, that the culture difference, you really want it to have faster iteration basically. >> And that also comes down to the team, the people, right? >> Yes. >> The people selection. >> Yes, if you are kind of used to the waterfall thing, it's pretty hard to adapt to this kind of the SaaS world. >> And what's your advice to entrepreneurs? Reset, because if you say speed is of the essence, resetting is probably something that's not hard to do, then. >> Well, I wouldn't say easy, but not easy-- >> I hate to use the word pivot, but you know, resetting means okay, stop, rebuild. >> I think one way to think about it is actually looking at it and how to build enterprise software, like the consumer sort of product way, right? If you think of Facebook or Google, the traditional Google, of course Google now has enterprise product, but the traditional sort of, the Google, Facebook, kind of the product, it's more for consumers to consume. I mean they are fast iterations. How often? What's the criteria to release a product? Enterprise product is getting towards there. You need that kind of the thing, so, if you don't know how to do it look at a Facebook, how Facebook, of course Facebook and YouTube pulled the other way around, they need to care more about the privacy, care about more stability. So I think you are seeing the the two sides of the world, the enterprise side and the consumer side. They are learning from each other. >> Well, I want to get to the enterprise talk track in a second, because I think you can give a lot of insight, so I want to stay on SaaS cloud native or cloud specifically, 'cause that's where SaaS really shines when you're really talking about cloud scale. Data, you're doing AI now, and you and I have both talked about data many times. >> Yes. >> You know I'm a data hardcore person. I love data. I think software and data, I wrote a blog post in 2007, that says data is the new developer kit. The word "developer kit" was used back then. You're now seeing where data is part of the developer's piece of their value creation. Highly addressable, available, usable, not stored in some silo unaddressable, high latency to get it. How important is the data for the SaaS piece? Because that's where to make these kind of changes you're talking about, you need the data, data's giving you insights, that's something that's near and dear to your heart. Explain your vision of the role of data. >> Yeah, I think, you touched up on it. If you want to make sense out of something, you need the data, right? And if it's not SaaS, I would go, maybe a more extreme way, but it's not clear to me the data's even useful to you 'cause you know the data may be for some large software company, they may have hundreds of thousands of customers out there, but the data is spread around. I mean how are you going to train a model with all the data spread around hundreds of thousands of locations? So the real, the correct, or the optimal way, is actually the SaaS model, you actually have the data with you and then you kind of leverage the data. So I would say this is actually another benefit of the SaaS, why SaaS is going to change the world or eat the world. It owns the data for real, right? The data may be not the private data, but it's actually could be a behavior data. How people are reacting to your features. From VMware days we wanted to know, is people even using this feature? How often people use this feature? You know people are always debating, "Hey what's the maximum policy we need to give this and that?" But in the SaaS world, no debate just look at it. We always say, "Don't listen to what customers are wanting you to do." But watch how they do things, so that you can sort of understand, what product you want to develop, right? Here you actually can really watch how customers using your product. Don't listen to them, if you listen to them you will give them a faster horse as we all knew. >> But what's important about the data discussion, because, a security person would say, "Hey if you put into one spot, I can hack it." But, it's not just people's names, it's other data. It's gesture data, it's usage data, so you're not talking about sign in data, it's data. >> It could be the behavior, it could be second order data. Do people use my product, that's my data. That's something I wanted to know, I'm not necessarily talking about peeking into people's email, no. It's actually the thing surrounding it. >> It's looking for the good things in the data. All right, let's talk about the customer alignment and customer expectations, you know customer user experience is driven by customer's expectations usually, right? As expectations change. And I think the Zoom thing jumped out at me, the Zoom IPO and their great success and were a customer as well, is that they really nailed the expectation of the user and cloud certainly helped them get that speed, but this is a key thing, if you could just deliver a great experience. >> Yeah. >> For those customers, you can actually win big part of the market. >> Yeah, if you Google, Eric. Eric doesn't speak to me as much, but if you Google Eric. >> We'll get him on theCUBE. >> What's sort of the jump? Hopefully I can help you to bring him here too. But what's going to be obvious if you Google search Eric he is sort of the notion of customer successes, my success. If customer is happy, I'm going to happy. So, my happiness hinges on the customer's happiness. So that's, kind of very important because only the SaaS model made that more natural. In traditional model, whether traditional on prime or we're not, you sort of celebrate when you have customer signing your PO and then you don't hear from the sales guy or three years, the sales guy may move on to another company, you don't know, right? But for the SaaS, it doesn't stop when sign the PO. You actually have to earn customers' happiness every single day. >> Adoption's critical. >> Yeah, customer success is important and then that's kind of the, so there is a huge alignment, very interesting alignment between customer's happiness, customer success, customer adoption of your product and you're sort of, the success, right? 'Cause you know, when I came to Zscaler, one of our first meeting is about, okay, we had a lot of customer interest us. They sign a PO. How to get them ramp up the actual first use, right? So, that kind of conversation doesn't happen in the traditional software company. You sign a PO. If the customer doesn't use your product for another 18 month which is actually quite normal, no one is going to jump up and say, "This is crazy!" Right? >> You know, we're going to do that on our Part Two, about the impact of the enterprise. But you made up a good point there, I want to just close out our last talk point is, the data driving the experience isn't like the old way of throw in, get the PO and celebrate. You got to, kind of, keep that going. The enterprise is changing and the enterprise has a tsunami of onboarding of new types of developers. In some cases they grow. We just had Cisco inside here on theCUBE this morning. They're turning network guys into programmers from CL command line prompt dudes to gals to coders. You're seeing developers now enter the enterprise to build the apps so there's now a digital transformation initiative for enterprises to be, I guess, SaaS-like. But it's hard. >> Yeah, I think that's, you know, this is part of the digital transformation. Every company, Fortune 500 or Fortune 2000 company need to do it, right? So, another interesting part is, when they do this on this journey of digitalization, you cannot possibly build all the infrastructure yourself. You will have to consume public cloud, you know sometimes private and hybrid cloud, and you are actually going to consume lots of the SaaS, right? Whether Zoom, the Zscaler, or the PagerDuty, I mean you are not going to be all those thing from scratch but you want it to have a very good, sort of the stack on top of it and how you going to take advantage of the SaaS, is a very interesting aspect. >> Well in Part Two of our chat, when we come back on our next discussion, I want to get into the enterprise. But to wrap up Part One here, innovation speed, leveraging data and the beautiful risk taking and benefits of SaaS. Large scale, fast, high value, target and developing an app or a venture. >> Yeah. >> What is your advice to entrepreneurs out there and/or someone who's doing a digital transformation? Where they want to leverage Saas, what's the playbook, what's the starting point, what's your advice? >> Well, there are a number of things. One, there are so many SaaS companies out there taking advantage of them, right? In the old days you have to hire email admins, you have to do this. Nowadays, all the SaaS, that's your kind of, you only need to worry about the business logic, you have some unique insight in the business and then just have, hire programmers to codify that and then the rest will magically happen because of the public cloud, because of the SaaS. So, be very mindful about the new environment you are in, that's number one. The second thing I want to say is, how do you look at AI technology? The older way is program something in a definitive way. I think there will be a limit for that. It has taken the software industry a long way to where we are. But, if you look at the next 20 years, I think a lot of the lift is going to be done by the AI Center. But it's not going to be easy to be done, you have to think about your data strategy, where are you going to have the massive, sustainable, unique, ideally even labeled data. If you don't have the labeled data, you have to have the strategy. How are you going to have some unique model with the data you have? So, the data strategy, right? So, essentially, how to take advantage of the cloud? How to take advantage of the data? And then on top of that you are going to do something that's solving an unmet um-- >> Customer problem. >> Customer problem. >> An acute landing spot in the market place. >> Unmet need. >> In a big market. >> In a big, well, in a big market. >> There it is. >> Even if there is already a mature solution I bet, since those mature solutions would not develop from that native cloud era, and the native AI era. You have plenty of opportunities. >> Howie, you and I are on the same page on this, I have been saying it truly believe we are living in an entrepreneurial era where, with your advice and what you just laid out, the better mousetrap can take down a big market. >> And, I'm hopeful that you will also disrupt the media business, you know we're-- >> Don't tell anyone! (laughing) We're still going to do that top secret of Silent Running. Howie, we're going to get Part Two. We're going to dig Deep into the enterprise, because the enterprise now has an opportunity in the first historic time in tech history, to use tools and technologies to completely reset and re-architect for this kind of capability. >> Absolutely. >> So, we'll hit that in Part Two. >> I'm super passionate about it too. >> Howie Xu, here inside theCUBE. Friend of theCUBE, legend in the industry. Great entrepreneur and technologist here, sharing CUBEConversation. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (upbeat jazz music)
SUMMARY :
in the heart of Silicon Valley, Great to have you come in and chat about-- that we were talking about on email and over text, you saw the rapid growth there. the data driven kind of the thing, it's so different. 'cause I think you bring some good perspective They really innovated the focus, the speed of success. One is the product, the life cycle is very different. And this is a unique thing, you said before, so you can accelerate the innovation You can push code, you don't have the on-premise dynamics. the more you are willing to take risk, that you have been talking about publicly, But in the traditional way you have product manager and you look at their mechanisms For the traditional one, you cannot afford to do that, Yes, if you are kind of used to the waterfall thing, Reset, because if you say speed is of the essence, I hate to use the word pivot, but you know, kind of the product, it's more for consumers to consume. and you and I have both talked How important is the data for the SaaS piece? and then you kind of leverage the data. "Hey if you put into one spot, I can hack it." It's actually the thing surrounding it. if you could just deliver a great experience. For those customers, you can actually but if you Google Eric. and then you don't hear If the customer doesn't use your product The enterprise is changing and the enterprise and you are actually going to consume leveraging data and the beautiful risk taking In the old days you have to hire email admins, in a big market. and the native AI era. Howie, you and I are on the same page on this, in the first historic time in tech history, Friend of theCUBE, legend in the industry.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Howie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
May 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Howie Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Lyft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zoom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
18 month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first shipment | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
800 pound | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one shot | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SaaS | TITLE | 0.97+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first meeting | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Zscaler | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Silent Running | TITLE | 0.96+ |
AI Center | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Part One | OTHER | 0.96+ |
hundreds of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Silicon Valley, | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first use | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Saas | TITLE | 0.94+ |
hundreds of thousands of customers | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Fortune | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
one spot | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
CUBEConversation | EVENT | 0.92+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.91+ |
Part Two | OTHER | 0.91+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Fortune 500 | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
second order | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
WebEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
PagerDuty | TITLE | 0.88+ |
many years ago | DATE | 0.86+ |
one way | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
prime | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.81+ |
Micheline Nijmeh, Zscaler | CUBEConversation, March 2019
(funky music) >> From our studios, in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, this is a Cube Conversation. >> Hi, I'm Peter Burris, and welcome to another Cube Conversation from our beautiful studios here in Palo Alto, California. This is going to be a Cube Conversation that focuses on marketing. It's one of the series that we have where we're talking to CMO's here in the valley and beyond 'about the challenges of marketing and the role that marketing is playing in driving increasing levels of value to customers. And, to have that conversation, we've got Micheline Nijmeh, who's a CMO of Zscaler here in the Cube with us today. Micheline, welcome to the Cube. >> Thank you, glad to be here. >> So, Zscaler, tell us a little bit about Zscaler. Let's get started there. >> Zscaler is really transforming traditional network security. They are a security cloud platform that securely connects users to applications, no matter what location, on any device, over any network. And just to kind of put it in a little more context, if you think about how cloud and mobility are changing, how organizations are transforming digitally into the cloud, network security's changing, right? Apps are moving to the cloud, out of the data center, and there's no longer a perimeter to secure, filled with appliances to secure their data, their applications, and the mobile workforce, well they're accessing these apps not in your traditional method. They want secure, fast, reliable access. And, Zscaler is the platform that was born in the cloud, built for the cloud to help securely access those applications. >> Well, you'll get no argument from me about how important network security is. It's one of the fastest growing and become one of the largest areas of spending within an IT organization. >> Yeah. But, let's put that aside. >> Yes. >> And instead talk about marketing. You mentioned digital transformation. Let's start there, what does digital transformation mean to marketing? >> To me as a marketer, I think of how can you run your organization with the minimal amount of manual steps you can take? Why, it's because how do I connect better with my customer? It's going to make me more efficient, effective, you know, save money, right? It's going to cost savings there, but it's going to help me understand my customer better because I'm going to have the data. It's going to give me the data that I need, that single pane of glass, because all of these tools will allow me to have a better access to my customer, faster, more efficient, and understand them better. >> Well, I've been working in the marketing technologies space for quite some time at various other, in various places, but one of the observations I make is that a lot of the marketing automation tools are not growing as fast as you think their tool would suggest. By that I mean, if their tool is that great, by using their own tool, they'd be growing a lot faster than they are. That always suggested to me that the real value of these tools is in how they're utilized by people. So, it's still as highly dependent upon how the marketing organization uses these tools, and that's even more important than the selection of the tools. What, what do you think about that? >> Absolutely, if you think about a tool, it's not moving away from that human connection. It's enabling you to have a better human connection. And, if you don't have the right amount of tools, sorry, the right type of tools that allows you to engage with your customer better, then why have them? There's data that shows almost 30 percent of marketers have 11 to 20 tools, that's crazy. And, if you don't have them integrated, if you don't have them working and talking to each other, then they're going to be a hindrance more than help to a marketer. >> But, that also suggests, and you mentioned, we start our program by talking about digital and how digital can improve efficiencies, and effectiveness, but also how it can transform the role that marketing could play within a business. At Zscaler, what is the role of marketing and how do you envision that that role could change over time? >> Zscaler, when we, we are so customer-centric, right? Our customer is truly at the center and the heart of everything we do from our customer success team to our CEO to our CTO, all of our C-level execs, and everyone within those organizations think customer first, and marketing is another organization that has put them at the heart. And, when we think about a buying journey, that's how we start our any sort of planning, any sort of strategy. We look at how did we, how do we engage and drive interest before they buy, of course. How do we engage with them through this purchasing experience? And then, how does marketing impact them post-sale? And it takes sales, customer success team, marketing all working together as a true machine and that's what, how we've evolved marketing at Zscaler. >> So, is marketing a cog in the function, or, which of course it is in certain respects, but are you seeing that marketing is expanding it's role within Zscaler, becoming more of a steward of customer related data, becoming more of an advocate for customer experience, is that happening at Zscaler as well? >> Zscaler from the start, to be honest with you, has always valued marketing, so our CEO is a number one advocate and fan of marketing. You could not have anymore happiness as a marketer to have that, so he's been a huge advocate, so I can't say it's been more. I think what we're seeing more is optimizing it. How are we understanding the buyer a little bit better? How do we understand their challenges, their needs? And then, what are we doing to help solve that problem? So, that's kind of how we're evolving. It's, it's less about having more fans because it's been, we've been so lucky to have such huge advocates from sales, customer success, all the way to the exec team. It's been really wonderful. >> Well, I'll tell you a quick story. This is, the CEO at one the valley's juggernauts once told me a number of years ago when I asked him what was the value of marketing to this particular company. He said, oh marketing's what I put between my sales and engineers people to make sure they don't kill each other. >> Right. (laughing) >> Sounds like that's not the role of marketing in place at Zscaler. >> Nope. >> You mentioned being customer-centric, and having marketing sustaining the focus, helping Zscaler sustain and reapply that focus in the customer that we see a new challenge emerging in the industry, how do we use data to personalize what we offer to customers and sustain that engagement versus violating the privacy? What's some of the challenges that you've encountered as a CMO at Zscaler as you try to find that balance, especially given new regulations like GDPR? >> Right, GDPR, you know, when you first hear about it, when it first came out, it was a beast. And, as a marketer, you start thinking, am I doing the right thing, am I following, am I being compliant, but at the end of the day, marketers have had bad behaviors. We have not been, you know, looking at our database, and understanding how to engage, how to deliver that value to our customer all the time, consistently. You say it, but sometimes you realize in your best practices it doesn't always come true. So, with GDPR and other, you know, standards that are coming in, it is enabling us to make sure and look back, are we following what we need to do to be compliant, but are we delivering the value to the customer? And, for us it's been, to be honest with you, great. As a consumer, I love it. As a marketer, as challenging it has been, it has really helped us reset, make sure that we are engaging properly. We are delivering that story that, really, the persona cares about, and not just hitting them with, you know, communications over and over without really thinking through of what your needs are, what your challenges are, and then, how our solution helps. >> Now, I've always liked to say, and I want to see if you agree with this, that if marketing focuses on delivering value with every touch, they rarely get in the problems about abusing privacy, does that resonate? >> Completely agree, and that's why, when you put a strategy together of how you're engaging, who you're engaging with, but really understanding who you're communicating then that value comes through. Because you're not going to be sending them any sort of message that doesn't resonate. Because you've done your homework. You've looked at your database. It's compliant, you're understanding how you're engaging with them properly. So, it is huge in terms of delivering value. >> So data is essential to marketing. Customer data sounds like it's essential to Zscaler. >> Correct. >> I'm want to throw you off a little bit. >> See if you can help me out here. >> Connect Zscaler secure networking to making the CMO's job better. >> So, when you think of Zscaler, we are, we have so much data, right? Understanding kind of the usage, the patterns, and so, by delivering, by having the CXO's, the CIO's understanding what data's in front of them, we're giving them this visibility that they've never had before, so they know what apps are out there, how they're being used, where there's security risks. Marketing has similar data, right? Different tools, but we have this, we have that access to data understanding how the consumer, our customer, is engaging, where do they go on the web. I mean, it's a little scary, but we do understand how they're engaging with us, and then, we make better marketers. Just as we have better security networks in the cloud built because of the accessibility and the visibility, marketing is getting those similar tools as well. >> I got to believe that as a CMO who's worried about the customer experiences, especially in a world where there seems to be an ongoing onslaught against trust, that it's, that marketers also need to feel that they can trust their data, that marketing is becoming increasingly distributed and part of a community to get the work done, and that it's a essential feature of all of this, so that a marketer can say, I trust my data, and I know and I want my customers to be able to trust their digital interactions with us. Have I got that right? >> Absolutely, you have to trust your data, but you also have to have trust in how you use your data. If you're not being accountable on how the data is used, you're not being a good marketer. You don't want to take advantage of the data that you do have. You should be able to understand the data, and then, how do you turn that around to engage with your audience. >> And, it sounds like Zscaler, trusted, secure, networking, cloud-based service, is potentially a real tool a marketer can use, both internally as well as externally with customers. >> Absolutely. >> Alright, so, one last set of questions. There's been a lot of conversation about how diversity improves a business, to shareholders, to employees, and also to customers. So, you're often, tell us a little bit about what it means to be a woman in the CMO job in a technology company. >> Peter, you know, I've been a woman in the technology company my entire life and what is important to me is that I am looked at just as equal as everyone else, but really I feel responsible, and accountable, and almost a role-model to every woman out there. So, for me, I hold myself at a higher standard, but because I need to make sure I'm, I'm delivering and being my authentic self. I'm able to voice what my, you know, my feelings are at any time. I don't see myself as a woman amongst a C-level exec. I see myself as a CMO amongst a C-level exec. So, for me it's being accountable, being responsible as a role-model for these women who are growing. It's mentoring them, but also again, I don't, I don't differentiate as a woman versus a man. I think for me, I am responsible as a marketer, as a leader, and, how do I lead the entire marketing organization, men or women? How do I lead them no matter what? I am their leader, I am responsible for them, and I consider them as, as kind of my, my family that I'm trying to nurture and grow as well. >> Alright, let's go out three years. >> Yeah. >> Where is Zscaler in the industry and what role is I marketing playing to get Zscaler there? >> We are changing and disrupting how network security is being managed. We are the largest cloud security platform built for the cloud, born in the cloud. And, I, I don't see us, anyone else kind of coming to us in three years from now. >> Fantastic. >> Yep. >> Micheline Nijmeh, CMO of Zscaler, thanks very much for being on the Cube. >> Thank you for having me. >> And, once again, I'm Peter Burris, thank you very much for watching this important Cube Conversation. Until next time. (funky music)
SUMMARY :
in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, It's one of the series that we have So, Zscaler, tell us a little bit about Zscaler. and there's no longer a perimeter to secure, and become one of the largest areas Let's start there, what does digital It's going to give me the data that I need, is that a lot of the marketing automation tools sorry, the right type of tools that allows you and how do you envision that and the heart of everything we do Zscaler from the start, to be honest of marketing to this particular company. Sounds like that's not the role to make sure and look back, are we following when you put a strategy together of how you're engaging, So data is essential to marketing. to making the CMO's job better. and so, by delivering, by having the CXO's, the CIO's and part of a community to get the work done, of the data that you do have. And, it sounds like Zscaler, to be a woman in the CMO job in a technology company. I'm able to voice what my, you know, of coming to us in three years from now. Micheline Nijmeh, CMO of Zscaler, thank you very much for watching
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Vadim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pravin Pillai | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vadim Supitskiy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pravin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rickard Söderberg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thomas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rickard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Evan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Micheline Nijmeh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Abdul Razack | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Micheline | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sept 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
March 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Evan Kaplan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hong Kong | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
11 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1949 | DATE | 0.99+ |
GANT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
G Suite | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
73% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mongo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
58% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Formex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
InluxData | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Abdul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jay Chaudhry, Zscaler | CUBE Conversations July 2017
>> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeffrey here with the cue, we're having acute conversation that are probably out. The studio's a little bit of a break in the conference schedule, which means we're gonna have a little bit more intimate conversations outside of the context of a show we're really excited to have. Our next guest is running $1,000,000,000 company evaluation that been added for almost 10 years. Cloud first from the beginning, way ahead of the curve. And I think the curves probably kind of catching up to him in terms of really thinking about security in a cloud based way. It's J. Charger. He's the founder and CEO of Ze Scaler. J Welcome. Thank you, Jeff. So we've had a few of your associates on, but we've never had you on. So a great to have you on the Cube >> appreciate the opportunity. >> Absolutely. So you guys from the get go really took a cloud native approach security when everyone is building appliances and shipping appliances and a beautiful fronts and flashing lights and everyone's neighborhood appliances. You took a very different tact explain kind of your thinking when you founded the company. >> So all the companies I had done. I looked for a fuss to move her advantage. So if you are first mover, then you got significant advantage. A lot of others. So look at 2008 we were goingto Internet for a whole range of service is lots of information sitting there from weather to news and all the other stuff right now on Cloud Applications. Point of view sales force was doing very well. Net Suite was doing well, and I have been using sales force in that suite and all of my start up since the year 2001. Okay, when each of them was under 10,000,000 in sales. So my notion was simple. Will more and more information sit on the Internet? Answer was yes. If sales force the nets weed is so good, why won't other applications move? The cloud answer was yes. So if that's the case, why should security appliances sit in the data? Security should sit in the cloud as well. So with that simple notion, I said, if I start a new company, no legacy boxes to what he bought, you start a clean slate, clean architecture designed for the cloud. What we like to call. Born in the cloud for a cloud. That's what I did. What >> great foresight. I mean trying in 2008 if tha the enterprise Adoption of cloud I mean sales was really was the first application to drive that. I mean, I just think poor 80 p gets no credit for being really the earliest cloud that they weren't really a solution right there. That's the service provider. But sales force really kind of cracked the enterprise, not four. Trust with SAS application wasn't even turn back back then. So So, taking a cloud approach to security. Very different strategy than an appliance. And, you know, credit to you for thinking about you know, you could no longer build the wall in the moat anymore. Creon and Internet world. Yeah. >> So my no show, no simple. The old world off security Waas What you just mentioned castle and moat. I am safe in my castle. But when people wanted to go out to call it greener pastures, right, you needed to build a drawbridge. And that's the kind of drawbridge these appliances bills. And then if you really want to be outside for business and all other reasons you're not coming in right? So notion of Castle and Motors, No good. So we said, Let's give it up. So let's get away from the notion that I must secure my network on which users and applications are sitting. I really need to make sure the right user has access to write application or service, which may be on the Internet, which may be on a public cloud, which may be a sass application like Salesforce. Or it may be the data center. So we really thought very differently, Right? Network security will become irrelevant. Internet will become your corporate network, and we connect the right user to write application, Right? Very logical. It took us a while to evangelize and convince a bunch of customers, right. But as G and Nestle and Seaman's off, the Wolf jumped on it because they love the technology. We got fair amount of momentum, and then lots of other enterprises came along >> right, right. It's so interesting that nobody ever really talked about the Internet, has an application delivery platform back in the day, right? It was just it was Bbn. And then we had a few pictures. Thank you Netscape, but really to think of the Internet as a way to deliver application and an enterprise applications with great foresight that you had there. >> Yes. So I think we built >> on the foresight off sales force in that suite and other information sources on the great. I >> came from security side off it. I built a number of companies that build and sold appliances, right. But it was obvious that in the new world, security will become a service. So think of cloud computing. People get surprised about cloud computing being big. It's natural. It's a utility service. If I'm in the business on manufacturing veg, it's a B and C. Gray computing is not my business. If just like I plug into the wall socket, get electricity right, I should be able to turn on some device and terminal and access abdication, sitting somewhere right and managed by someone right and all. So we re needed good connectivity over the Internet to do that. As that has matured over the past 10 years, as devices have become more capable and mobile, it's a natural way to go to cloud computing, and for us to do cloud security was a very natural >> threat. Right. So then you use right place right time, right. So then you picked up on a couple These other tremendous trends that that that ah cloud centric application really take advantage of first is mobile. Next is you know, B Bring your own global right B y o d. And then this this funky little thing called Shadow I T. Which Amazon enabled by having a data center of the swipe of a credit card. Your application, your technology. This works great with all those various kind of access methodologies. Still consistently right >> now. And that is because the traditional security vendors so called network security vendors but protecting the network they assumed that you sat in an office on the Net for great. Only if you're outside. You came back to the network through vpn, right? We assume that Forget the network. Ah, user sitting in the office or at home or coffee shop airport has to get to some destination over some network. That's not What about securing the net for Let's have a policy and security. It says Whether you are on a PC auto mobile phone, you're simply connecting through our security check post. Do what you want to go. So mobile and clothes for the natural. Two things mobile became the user cloud became the destination, and Internet became the connector off the two. And we became the policy check post in the middle. >> So what? So what do you do in terms of your security application? Are you looking at, you know, Mac addresses? Are you looking at multi factor authentication? Cause I would assume if you're not guarding the network per se, you're really must be all about the identity and the rules that go along with that identity. >> It's a good question, so user needs to get to certain applications, and service is so you put them into buckets. First is external service is external means that a company doesn't need to management, and that is either open Internet, which could be Google Search could be Facebook lengthen and type of stuff. Or it could be SAS applications that Salesforce offers on Microsoft Office E 65. So in that case, we want to make sure that been uses. Go to those sites. Nothing bad should comment. That means the malware stuff and nothing good chili con you confidential information. So we are inspecting traffic going in and out. So we are about inspecting the traffic, the packets, the packets to make sure this is not malicious. Okay, Now, for authentication, we use third party serves like Microsoft A D or Octagon. They tell us who the user is into what the group is. And based on that sitting in the traffic path were that I who enforce the policy so that is for external applications. Okay, the second part of the secular service, what we called the school a private access is to make sure that you can get to your internal applications. Either in your data center, all this sitting in a public cloud, such chance as your eight of us there were less. Whatever mouth we're more worried about is the right person getting to the right application and the other checks are different. There you are connecting the right parties, Okay. Unless worried about >> security, and then does it work with the existing, um, turn of the of, you know, the internal corporate systems. Who identified you? Integrate, I assume, with all those existing types of systems. >> Yes. So we look at the destination you did. Existing system could be sitting on in your data center or in the cloud. It doesn't really matter. We look at your data center as a destination. OK, we look at stuff sitting in Azure as a destiny. >> And then and then this new little twist. So obviously Salesforce's been very successfully referenced them a few times, and I just like to point to the new 60 story tower. If anyone ever questions whether people think Cloud of Secures, go look downtown at the new school. But there's a big new entrance in play on kind of the Enterprise corporate SAS side. And that's office 3 65 It's not that noone you are still relatively new. I'm just curious to get your perspective. You've been at this for 10 years? Almost, um, the impact of that application specifically to this evolution to really pure SAS base model, getting more and more of the enterprise software stack. >> So number one application in any enterprise is email >> before you gotta think that's gonna be your next started. We gotta fix today after another e >> mail calendar ring sharing files and what it used to sit in your data center and you had to buy deploy manage Sutter was with in a Microsoft exchange. So Microsoft said, Forget about you managing it. I've will manage your exchange, uh, with a new name, all 50 65 in the clout so you don't what he bought it and are You come to me and I'll take care off it. I think it's a brilliant move by Microsoft, and customers are ready to give up. The headaches are maintaining the boxes, the software and sordid and everything. Right now, when the biggest application moves the cloud, every CEO pays attention to it. So as Office God embraced the corporate network start to break. Now, why would that happen if you aren't in 50 cities and on the globe, your exchanges? Sitting in Chicago Data Center every employee from every city came to Chicago. Did know Microsoft Office. This is sun setting something. Why should every employee go to Chicago? That's the networks on and then try to go to cloud right? So they're back. Haul over traditional corporate network using Mpls technology very expensive, and then they go to them. Then they go to the Internet to go to office. If the 65 slow slow. No one likes it. Microsatellite. >> Get too damn slow >> speed. OnlyTest Fetal light. You can only go so far. It's >> not fast. If you're going around the world and you're waiting for something, I >> have to go to New York City to my data center so I could come to a local site in San Francisco. It is hard, right? Right, And that's what our traditional networks have done. That's what traditional security boxes down what Z's killer says. Don't worry about having two or three gateways to the Internet. You have as many gay tricks as your employees because every employee simply points to the Z's. Killers near this data center were the security stack. We take care of security inspection and policy, and you get to where you need to get to the fastest way. So Office 3 65 is a great catalyst for the skin. Asked customers of struggling with user experience and the traffic getting clogged on the traditional network. We go in and say, if you did local Internet breakout, you go direct, but you couldn't go direct without us because you need some security check personally. So we are the checkpost sitting 100 data centers around the globe and uses a happy customer. We are happy. >> So I was gonna be my next point. Begs the question, How many access points do you guys have just answered? You have hundreds. So you worked with local Coehlo. You got a short You got a short hop from your device into the sea scaler system and then you you're into your network. >> You know, we are deployed and 100 data center. These are generally cola is coming from leading vendors. Maybe it connects maybe level three tire cities of gold and the goal is to shorten the distance. I'll tell you two interesting anecdotes. I talked to a C i o last year. I said, How many employees do you have? He said 10,000 said, How many Internet gateways do you have? I tell you, it's safe. I he's a 10,000. I said What? He said. Every employee has a laptop and laptop goes with it. Employee goes and indirectly goes the Internet. It's a gate for you, Right? Then he said, Sorry, I'm Miss Booke. Every employee is a smartphone, and many have tablets to have 25,000 gate. So if you start thinking that way, trying to take all the traffic back to some security appliance is sitting in a data center or 10 branch offices, right? Makes no sense. So that's where we come in. And I had an interesting discussion with a very large consumer company out of Europe. I went to see them to one of her early customers. I >> met the >> head of security. I said, I'm here to understand how well these killers working. Since our security is so good, you must be loving it. He smiled, and he said, I love you security, but I love something more than your security. I said, Huh? What is that? He said. Imagine if the world had four airport hubs to connect through and you are a world traveler. You'll be missing, he said. I have 160,000 employees in hundreds, 30 countries. I have four Internet gateways with security appliance sitting there and everyone has to go to one of those four before they get out, right, so they were miserable. Now they are blogging on the Internet than entrant has become very fast, she said. As a C so I love it because security leaders are blamed for slowing you down in the name of security. Now I have made uses happy abroad in better security. So it's all wonderful. >> Hey, sounds like you're a virtual networking company that Trojan horsed in as a security company >> way. So let's put it this way. I >> mean, the value problem. Like I'm just I'm teasing you. But it's really interesting, you know, kind of twisted tale, >> so don't know you actually making a very good point. So So this is what happening Every c. I is talking about digital transformation through I t transmission Right now. If you start drilling down, what does that mean? Applications are moving in the cloud. So that's the application transformation going on because applications are no longer in your data center, which was the central gravity. If applications the move to the cloud, the network that designed to bring everything to the data center becomes irrelevant. It's no good. So no companies are transforming the data center bit. Sorry, they're transforming the network not to transform network so you could directly go to the application. The only thing that's holding you back is security, so we essentially built a new type of security, so we're bringing security transformation, which is needed. Do transform your network and transfer your application. Right? So that's why people customers who buy us is typically the head off application, head of security and head of networking. All three come together because transformation doesn't happen in isolation. Traditional security boxes are bought, typically by the security team only because they said, put a box here, you need to inspect the traffic. We go in and say the old world off ideas change. Let me help you transform to the New World. Why we call it cloned enabled enterprise, right? And that's what we come >> pretty interesting, too, when you think of the impact that not only are you leveraging us and security layer in this cloud and getting in the way of the phone traffic in the laptop traffic, but to as people migrate to Maura and Maur of these enterprise SAS APS, you're leveraging their security infrastructure, which is usually significantly bigger than any particular individual company can ever afford. >> That that's correct. So a point there so sales force an enterprise doesn't need to worry about protecting Salesforce, they need to make sure they can have a shortest path and the right user is getting so. We help as a policy jackboots in the middle, and also we make sure employees on downloading confidential customer information and sending out in Gmail to somebody else. But when applications moved to Azure or eight of us, you as an enterprise have to what he bought securing it if you expose them. If there is all to the Internet, then somebody can discover you. Somebody can do denial of service attack. So how do you handle that? So that's where we come in. We kind of say even 1,000,000,000 applications are in azure. I will give you the shortest bat with all the technology that you need to secure your internal >> happy. It's interesting because there's been recent breaches reported at Amazon, where the Emma's the eight of US customer didn't secure their own instance. Inside of eight of us, it wasn't an eight of US problems configuration problem >> or it could be the policy problem or possible. Somebody, for example, came into your data center over vpn, and once they're on you network, they can have what we call the lateral boom and they can go around to see what's out there. And they could get to applications. So we overcome all those security >> issues. Okay, so you've been at this for a while. 3 65 is a game changer and kind of accelerating as you look forward, Um, what excites you? What scares you? You know, where do you see kind of security world evolving? Obviously, you know, here in the news all the time that the attacks now or, you know, oftentimes nation states and you know it's it's the security challenges grown significantly higher than just the crazy hacker working out of his mom's basement. A CZ You see the evolution? You know what, What, what's kind of scary and what's exciting. >> I think the scary part is inertia. People kind of say this high done security than the castle and moat. That's still still because they feel like I can put my arms that only I can see the drawbridge. And I got to see the airplane right over the missing on that. So so one someone gets into your castle, you're in trouble, right? So in the new approach we advocate, don't worry about castles, and moats. The desk applications are out there somewhere. Your users are out there somewhere, right? And they just need to reach the right application. So we are focuses connecting the right people. Now, more and more devices coming in. We all here. But I owe tease out. The I. O. T. At the end of the day is a copier printer of video camera or some machine controls >> or a nuclear power plant. >> They all need to talk to something, something right if they got hijacked. You thinkyou nuclear power plant is sending information about its health to place a. But it's going to Ukraine, right? That's a problem. How do you make sure that the coyote controls in a plant are talking right parties? So we actually sit in the middle, are connecting the party. So that's another area for us. For potential, right? Looking at opportunity. >> So another big one like mobile and in 3 65 wasn't enough. Now you have I a t. >> It's a natural hanging out with you. So today, every day we see tens of thousands of cameras and copiers calling the Internet, and customers have no idea know why are they calling. Generally, there's no malicious motive. The vendor wanted to know if the toner is down or not. Are things are working fine, but they have no security control. R. C So does a demo from the Internet. He logs onto the camera, are the printer and copier and actually gets can show that information can be obtained. So those are some of the things we must control and protect. And you do it not by doing network security but a policy base access from a right device to alright, destiny. >> So, are you seeing an increase in the in the, you know, kind of machine machine? A tremendous amount of >> traffic machine to machine. So is io to traffic, and there's a machine to machine traffic. So when you have a bunch of applications said in our data center and you a bunch of applications sitting an azure eight of us, they need to talk. So lot of that traffic goes through Z Skinner. Okay, so we're long enforcing it, then you're an application that needs to go and get, say, some market pricing information from Internet. So the machine a sitting in your data center or in azure is calling someone out. There are some server to get that information. So we come in in between as a checkpost too. Have right connectivity. >> You're saying I proper. Same value difference. Very simple, but elegant. J I'm hanging out of the more you see now, the touch to nowhere to be at the right time. We're having fun. It's a great story, and and I really appreciate you taking a few minutes out of your day to stop. But I >> have a great team that makes it happen. >> That's a big piece of it. Well, and good leadership as well. Obviously >> great leaders in the company. >> All right, Thank you. J Child Reza, founder and CEO of Ze Scaler. Check it out. Thanks again for stopping by the Cube. I'm Jeff. Rick. Thanks for watching. We'll catch you next time.
SUMMARY :
So a great to have you on the Cube So you guys from the get go really took a cloud So if you are first mover, then you got significant advantage. So So, taking a cloud approach to security. So let's get away from the notion that I must secure my network on which It's so interesting that nobody ever really talked about the Internet, has an application on the foresight off sales force in that suite and other information sources connectivity over the Internet to do that. So then you use right place right time, right. So mobile and clothes for the natural. So what do you do in terms of your security application? That means the malware stuff and nothing good chili con you confidential of the of, you know, the internal corporate systems. We look at your data center as a destination. And that's office 3 65 It's not that noone you are still relatively new. before you gotta think that's gonna be your next started. So as Office God embraced the You can only go so far. If you're going around the world and you're waiting for something, I We go in and say, if you did local Internet breakout, you go direct, device into the sea scaler system and then you you're into your network. So if you start thinking that way, hubs to connect through and you are a world traveler. So let's put it this way. you know, kind of twisted tale, So that's the application transformation going on because applications pretty interesting, too, when you think of the impact that not only are you leveraging us and security layer all the technology that you need to secure your internal the eight of US customer didn't secure their own instance. So we overcome all Obviously, you know, here in the news all the time that the attacks now or, you know, So in the new approach we advocate, don't worry about So we actually sit in the middle, are connecting the party. Now you have I a t. And you do it not by doing So the machine a sitting in your data center out of the more you see now, the touch to nowhere to be at the right time. That's a big piece of it. Thanks again for stopping by the Cube.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chicago | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jay Chaudhry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2008 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July 2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
$1,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
J Child Reza | PERSON | 0.99+ |
50 cities | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ukraine | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
160,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gmail | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Booke | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2001 | DATE | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
J. Charger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two interesting anecdotes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Coehlo | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first application | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Bbn | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
100 data center | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
80 p | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
under 10,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Ze Scaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Chicago Data Center | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
three gateways | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
60 story | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ | |
Two things | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
almost 10 years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
1,000,000,000 applications | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Mac | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.95+ |
first mover | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
65 slow slow | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
four airport hubs | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.94+ |
tens of thousands of cameras | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
50 65 | OTHER | 0.93+ |
Netscape | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Zscaler | PERSON | 0.92+ |
Microsatellite | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Office | TITLE | 0.92+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
hundreds, 30 countries | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Salesforce | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Microsoft Office | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
Maura | PERSON | 0.87+ |
3 65 | OTHER | 0.87+ |
25,000 gate | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Maur | PERSON | 0.87+ |
J | PERSON | 0.86+ |
Emma | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
10 branch offices | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
G and | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
Office E 65 | TITLE | 0.78+ |
Octagon | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
Amit Sinha, Zscaler | RSA 2017
>> Welcome back to the Cuban Peterborough's chief research officer of Silicon Angle and general manager of Wicked Bond. We're as part of our continuing coverage of the arse a show. We have a great guest Z scaler amid sin. Ha! Welcome to the Cube. >> Thank you for having me here. It's a pleasure to be here. >> So, um, it what exactly does Z scaler? D'oh >> Z's killer is in the business of providing the entire security stack as a service for large enterprises. We sit in between enterprise users and the Internet and various destinations they want to goto, and we want to make sure that they have a fast, nimble Internet experience without compromising any security. >> So if I can interpret what that means, that means that as Maur companies are trying to serve their employees that Air Mobile or customers who aren't part of their corporate network they're moving more. That communication in the Cloud Z scale is making it possible for them to get the same quality of security on that communication in the cloud is he would get on premise. >> Absolutely. If you look at some of the big business transformations that are happening, work lords for enterprises are moving to the cloud. For example, enterprises are adopting Office 3 65 instead, off traditional exchange based email and on your desktop applications. They might be adopting sales force for CR M Net suite for finance box for storage. So as these workloads are moving to the cloud and employees are becoming more and more mobile, you know they might be at a coffee shop. They might be on an iPad. Um, and they might be anywhere in the world. That begs the basic security question. Where should that enterprise DMC the security stack be sitting back in the day? Enterprises had a hub and spokes model, right? They might have 50 branch offices across the world. A few mobile workers, all of them, came back over private networks to a central hub, and that hub was where racks and racks of security appliances were deployed. Maybe they started off with a firewall. Later on, they added a proxy. You are l filtering some d e l P er down the road. People realized that you need to inspect us to sell. So they added some SSL offload devices. Someone said, Hey, we need to do some sand boxing for behavioral analysis. People started adding sandboxes. And so, over time the D. M. Z got cluttered and complicated and fast forward to Today. Users have become mobile. Workloads have moved to the cloud. So if I'm sitting in a San Francisco office on my laptop trying to do my regular work, my email is in the cloud. My my court applications are sitting in the cloud. Why should I have to vpn back to my headquarters in Cincinnati over a private network, you know, incurring all the Leighton see and the delays just so that I can get inspected by some legacy appliances that are sitting in that DMC, right? So we looked at that network transformation on We started this journey at Ze scale or eight years ago, and we said, Look, if users are going to be mobile and workloads are going to be in the cloud, the entire security stack should be as close as possible to where the users are. In that example, I described, I'm sitting here. I'm going to Salesforce. We're probably going to the same data center in San Francisco. Shouldn't my entire security stag be available right where I am, um, and my administrators should have full visibility, full control from a single pane of glass. I get a fast, nimble user experience. The enterprise doesn't have to compromise in any security, and that's sort of the vision that we have executing towards. >> But it's not just for some of the newer applications or some of the newer were close. We're also seeing businesses acknowledge that the least secure member of their community has an impact on overall security. So the whole concept of even the legacy has to become increasingly a part of this broad story. So if anybody accesses anything from anywhere through the cloud that those other workloads increasing, they're gonna have to come under the scrutiny of a cloud based security option. >> Absolutely. I mean, that's a brilliant point, Peter. >> I >> think of >> it this way. Despite all those security appliances that have been deployed over time, they're still security breach is happening. And why is that? That is because users are the weakest link, right? If I'm a mobile work user, I'm sitting in a branch office. It's just painful for me to go back to those headquarter facilities just for additional scanning so two things happen either I have a painful user experience. What? I bypassed security, right? Um, and more and more of the attacks that we see leverage the user as the weakest link. I send you a phishing email. It looks like it came from HR. It has a excel sheet attached to it to update some information. But, you know, inside is lurking a macro, right? You open it. It is from a squatter domain that looks very similar to the company you work for. You click on it and your machine is infected. And then that leads to further malware being downloaded, data being expatriated out. So the Z scaler solution is very, very simple. Conceptually, we want to sit between users and the destinations they goto all across the world. And we built this network of 100 data centers. Why? Because you cannot travel faster than the speed of light. So if you're in San Francisco, you better go through our San Francisco facility. All your policies will show up here. All the latest and greatest security protections will be available. We serve 5000 large enterprises. So if we discover a new security threat because of an employee from, let's say, a General Electric. Then someone from United Airlines automatically gets protection simply because the cloud is live all the time. You're not waiting for your security boxes to get, you know, the weekly patch updates for new malware indicators and so on. Right, So, um, you get your stack right where you are. It's always up to date. User experience is not compromised. Your security administrators get a global view off things. And one >> of the >> things that that I that we haven't talked about here it is the dramatic cost savings that this sort of network transformation brings for enterprises. To put that in perspective, let's say you're a Fortune 100 organization with 100,000 employees worldwide in that, huh? Been spoke model. You are forcing all those workloads to come toe a few choke points, right? That is coming over. Very expensive. NPLs circuits private circuits from service providers. You're double trombone in traffic, back and forth. You know, you and I are in a branch. We might be on. Ah, Skype session. Ah, Google Hangout session. All our traffic goes to H Q. Goes to the cloud comeback comes back to h. Q comes back to you, there's this is too much back and forth, and you're paying for those expensive circuits and getting a poor user experience. Wouldn't it be great if you and I could go straight to the Internet? And that can only be enabled if we can provide that pervasive security stack wherever you are? And for that, we built this network of 100 data centers worldwide. Always live, always up to date you. You get routed to the closest the scaler facility. All your policy show up. They're automatically and you get the latest and greatest protection. >> So it seems as though you end up with three basic benefits. One is you get the cost benefit of being able to, uh, have being able to leverage a broader network of talent, skills and resources You reduce. Your risk is not the least of which is that the cost and the challenges configuring a whole bunch of appliances has not gotten any easier over the last. No, it hasn't cheaters. And so not only do you have user error, but you also Administrator Erin, absolutely benign, but nonetheless it's there, and then finally and this is what I want to talk about. Increasingly, the clot is acknowledged as the way that companies are going to improve their portfolio through digital assets. Absolutely. Which means new opportunities, new competition, new ways of improving customer experience. But security has become the function of no within a lot of organizations. Absolutely. So How does how does AE scaler facilitate the introduction of new business capabilities that can attack these opportunities in a much more timely way by reducing doesn't reduce some of those some of those traditional security constraints. >> Absolutely right, and we call it the Department of No right. We've talked to most people in the industry. They view their I t folks there, security forces, the department of Know Why? Because there's this big push from users to adopt newer, nimble, faster cloud based ah solutions that that improved productivity. But often I t comes in the way. No, If you look at what Izzy's killer is doing, it's trying to transform the adoption of these Cloud service. Is that do improve business productivity? In fact, there is no debate now because there are many, many industries that ever doubt adopted a cloud first strategy. Well, that means is, as they think of the network and their security, they want to make sure that cloud is front and center. Words E scaler does is it enables that cloud for a strategy without any security compromise. I'll give you some specific examples. Eight out of 10 c I ose that we talk to our thinking about office 3 65 or they have already deployed it right. One of the first challenge is that happens when you try to adopt office. 3 65 is that your legacy network and security infrastructure starts to come crumble. Very simple things happen. You have your laptop. Suddenly, that laptop has many, many persistent SSL connections to the clothes. Because exchange is moved to the cloudy directory, service is are moving to the cloud. If you have a small branch office with 2000 users, each of them having 30 40 persistent connections to the cloud will your edge firewall chokes. Why? Because it cannot maintain so many active ports at the same time, we talked about the double trombone ing of traffic back and forth. If you try to not go direct to the Internet but force everyone to go through a couple of hubs. So you pay for all the excessive band with your traditional network infrastructure, and your security infrastructure might need a forklift upgrades. So a cloud transformation project quickly becomes a network in a security transformation project. And this is where you nosy scaler helps tremendously because we were born and bred in the cloud. Many of these traditional limitations that you have with appliance based security or networking, you know, in the traditional sense don't exist for the scaler, right? We can enable your branch officers to go directly to the cloud. In fact, we've started doing some very clever things. For example, we peer with Microsoft in about 20 sites worldwide. So what that means is, when you come to the scaler for security, there's a very high likelihood that Microsoft has a presence in the same data center. We might be one or two or three millisecond hops away because we're in the same equinox facility in New York or San Jose. And so not only are you getting your full security stack where you are, you're getting the superfast peered connections to the end Cloud service is that you want to goto. You don't have to work. Worry about you know your edge Firewalls not keeping up. You don't have to worry about a massive 30 40% increase in back hole costs because you were now shipping all this extra traffic to those couple of hubs. And more importantly, you know, you've adopted these transformative technologies on your users don't have to complain about how slow they are because you know, most of the millennials hitting the workforce. I used to a very fast, nimble experience on their mobile phones with consumer APS. And then they come into the enterprise and they quickly realize that, well, this is all cumbersome and old and legacy stuff >> in me s. So let's talk a little bit about Let's talk a bit about this notion of security being everywhere and increasingly is removed to a digital business or digital orientation. With digital assets being the basis for the value proposition, which is certainly happening on a broad scale right now, it means it's security going back to the idea of security being department. No security has to move from an orientation of limiting access to appropriately sharing. Security becomes the basis for defining the digital brand. So talk to us a little bit about how the how you look out, how you see the world, that you think security's gonna be playing in ultimately defining this notion of digital brand digital perimeters from a not a iittie standpoint. But from a business value standpoint, >> absolutely. I would love to talk about that. So Izzy's killer Our cloud today sees about 30,000,000,000 transactions a day from about 5000 enterprises. So we have a very, very good pulse on what is happening in large enterprises, from from a cloud at perspective or just what users are doing on the Internet. So here are some of the things that we see. Number one. We see that about 50 60% of the threats are coming inside SSL, so it's very important to inspect SSL. The second thing that we observe is without visibility. It is very different, very difficult for your security guys to come up with a Chris policy, right? If you cannot see what is happening inside an SSL connection, how are you going to have a date? A leakage policy, right? Maybe your policy is no P I information should leak out. No source code should leak out. How can you make sure that an engineer is not dropping something in this folder, which is sinking to Google Drive or drop box in an in an SSL tano, Right. How do you prioritize mission Critical business applications like office 3 65 over streaming media, Right. So for step two, crafting good policy is 100% real time visibility. And that's what happens when you adopt the Siskel a network. You can see what any user is doing anywhere in the world within seconds. And once you have that kind of visibility, you can start formulating policies, both security and otherwise that strike a good balance between business productivity that you want to achieve without compromising security. >> That's the policy's been 10 more net. You can also end that decisions. >> Yes, right. So, for example, you can you can have a more relaxed social media policy, right? You can say Well, you know, everyone is allowed access, but they can. Maybe streaming media is restricted to one hour a day. You know, after hours, or you can say, I want to adopt um, storage applications in the clothes here are some sanctioned APS These other raps were not going to allow right. You can do policies by users, by locations by departments, right? And once you have the visibility, you can. You can be very, very precise and say, Well, boxes, my sanction story, Jap other APS are not allowed right and hear other things that a particular group of users can do on box. Or they cannot do because we were seeing every transaction between the user on going to the destination and as a result, begin, you know, we can enable the enterprise administrator to come up with very, very specific policies that are tailored for that. >> You said something really interesting. I'm gonna ask you one more question, but I'm gonna make a common here. And that common is that the power of digital technology is that it can be configured and copied and changed, and it's very mutable. It's very plastic, but at the end of the day it has to be precise, and I've never heard anybody talk about the idea of precise and security, and I think it's a very, very powerful concept. But what are what's What's the scale are talking about in our say this year. >> Well, we're going to talk about a bunch of very interesting things. First, we'll talk about the scale of private access. This is a new offering on the scale of platform. We believe that VP ends have become irrelevant because of all the discussions we just had, um, Enterprises are treating their Internet as though it was the Internet, right? You know, sort of a zero trust model. They're moving the crown jewel applications to either private cloud offerings are, you know, sort of restricting that in a very micro segmented way. And the question is, how do you access those applications? Right? And the sea skill immortal is very straightforward. You have a pervasive cloud users authenticate to the cloud and based on policies, we can allow them to go to the Internet to sites that have been sanctioned and allowed. We make sure nothing good is leaking out. Nothing bad is coming in, and that same cloud model can be leveraged for private access to crown jewel applications that traditionally would have required a full blown vpn right. And the difference between a VPN and the skill of private access is VP ends basically give you full network access keys to the kingdom, right? Whether it's a contractor with, it's an employee just so that you could access, you know, Internet application. You allow full network access, and we're just gonna getting rid of that whole notion. That's one thing we're gonna stroke ISS lots of cloud white analytics, As I mentioned, you know, we process 30,000,000,000 transactions a day. To put that in perspective, Salesforce reports about four and 1 30,000,000,000 4 1/2 to 5,000,000,000 transactions. They're about three and 1/2 1,000,000,000 Google searches done daily, right? So it is truly a tin Internet scale. We're blocking over 100,000,000 threats every day for, ah, for all our enterprise user. So we have a very good pulse on you know what's what's an average enterprise user doing? And you're going to see some interesting cloud? Wait, Analytics. Just where we talk about a one of the top prevalent Claude APs, what are the top threats? You know, by vertical buy by geography, ese? And then, you know, we as a platform has emerged. We started off as a as a sort of a proxy in the cloud, and we've added sand boxing capabilities. Firewall capabilities, you know, in our overall vision, as I said, is to be that entire security stack that sits in your inbound and outbound gateway in that DMC as a pure service. So everything from firewall at layer three to a proxy at Layer seven, everything from inline navy scanning right to full sand. Boxing everything from DLP to cloud application control. Right? And all of that is possible because, you know, we have this very scalable architecture that allows you to to do sort of single scan multiple action right in that appliance model that I describe. What ends up happening is that you have many bumps in the wire. One of the examples we use is if you wanted to build a utility company, you don't start off with small portable generators and stack them in a warehouse, right? That's inefficient. It requires individual maintenance. It doesn't scale properly. Imagine if you build a turbine and ah, and then started your utility company. You can scale better. You can do things that traditional appliance vendors cannot think about. So we build this scalable, elastic security platform, and on that platform it's very easy for us to add. You know, here's a firewall. Here's a sandbox. And what does it mean for end users? You know, you don't need to deploy new boxes. You just go and say, I want to add sand boxing capabilities or I want to add private access or I want to add DLP. And it is as simple as enabling askew, which is what a cloud service offering should be. >> Right. So we're >> hardly know software. >> So we're talking about we're talking about lower cost, less likelihood of human error, which improves the quality, security, greater plasticity and ultimately, better experience, especially for your non employees. Absolutely. All right, so we are closing up this particular moment I want Thank you very much for coming down to our Pallotta studio is part of our coverage on Peter Boris. And we've been talking to the scanner amidst, huh? Thank you very much. And back to Dio Cube.
SUMMARY :
We're as part of our continuing coverage of the arse a show. Thank you for having me here. Z's killer is in the business of providing the entire security stack as a That communication in the Cloud Z scale is making it possible for People realized that you need to inspect us to sell. We're also seeing businesses acknowledge that the least secure I mean, that's a brilliant point, Peter. It is from a squatter domain that looks very similar to the company you work for. that pervasive security stack wherever you are? And so not only do you have user error, One of the first challenge is that happens when you try to adopt office. the how you look out, how you see the world, that you think security's gonna be playing And that's what happens when you adopt the Siskel a network. You can also end that decisions. You can say Well, you know, everyone is allowed access, I'm gonna ask you one more question, but I'm gonna make a common here. And all of that is possible because, you know, we have this very scalable So we're particular moment I want Thank you very much for coming down to our Pallotta studio
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cincinnati | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amit Sinha | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
General Electric | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Jose | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPad | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
100,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Peter Boris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Silicon Angle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dio Cube | PERSON | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United Airlines | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Pallotta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2000 users | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
about 5000 enterprises | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
eight years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Air Mobile | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
about 20 sites | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
1 30,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first challenge | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Wicked Bond | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one hour a day | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first strategy | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Leighton | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Skype | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
30 40% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
50 branch offices | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about 50 60% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Office 3 65 | TITLE | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
one more question | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
about 30,000,000,000 transactions a day | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
this year | DATE | 0.95+ |
single pane | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
4 1/2 | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Cloud Z | TITLE | 0.93+ |
Zscaler | PERSON | 0.93+ |
5000 large enterprises | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
over 100,000,000 threats | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Izzy | PERSON | 0.92+ |
3 65 | OTHER | 0.92+ |
Erin | PERSON | 0.92+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
step two | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.9+ |
D. M. Z | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
about three | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
10 more net | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
three basic benefits | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Claude | PERSON | 0.84+ |
30,000,000,000 transactions a day | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
Number one | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
three millisecond | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ | |
30 40 persistent connections | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
5,000,000,000 transactions | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
Ze scale | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
office | TITLE | 0.75+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
1/2 1,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
Department of | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
about four | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
CR M | ORGANIZATION | 0.67+ |
Jap | TITLE | 0.66+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
office 3 65 | TITLE | 0.64+ |
three | OTHER | 0.62+ |
Google Hangout | TITLE | 0.61+ |
Cuban Peterborough | ORGANIZATION | 0.6+ |
AI Meets the Supercloud | Supercloud2
(upbeat music) >> Okay, welcome back everyone at Supercloud 2 event, live here in Palo Alto, theCUBE Studios live stage performance, virtually syndicating it all over the world. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante here as Cube alumni, and special influencer guest, Howie Xu, VP of Machine Learning and Zscaler, also part-time as a CUBE analyst 'cause he is that good. Comes on all the time. You're basically a CUBE analyst as well. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks for inviting me. >> John: Technically, you're not really a CUBE analyst, but you're kind of like a CUBE analyst. >> Happy New Year to everyone. >> Dave: Great to see you. >> Great to see you, Dave and John. >> John: We've been talking about ChatGPT online. You wrote a great post about it being more like Amazon, not like Google. >> Howie: More than just Google Search. >> More than Google Search. Oh, it's going to compete with Google Search, which it kind of does a little bit, but more its infrastructure. So a clever point, good segue into this conversation, because this is kind of the beginning of these kinds of next gen things we're going to see. Things where it's like an obvious next gen, it's getting real. Kind of like seeing the browser for the first time, Mosaic browser. Whoa, this internet thing's real. I think this is that moment and Supercloud like enablement is coming. So this has been a big part of the Supercloud kind of theme. >> Yeah, you talk about Supercloud, you talk about, you know, AI, ChatGPT. I really think the ChatGPT is really another Netscape moment, the browser moment. Because if you think about internet technology, right? It was brewing for 20 years before early 90s. Not until you had a, you know, browser, people realize, "Wow, this is how wonderful this technology could do." Right? You know, all the wonderful things. Then you have Yahoo and Amazon. I think we have brewing, you know, the AI technology for, you know, quite some time. Even then, you know, neural networks, deep learning. But not until ChatGPT came along, people realize, "Wow, you know, the user interface, user experience could be that great," right? So I really think, you know, if you look at the last 30 years, there is a browser moment, there is iPhone moment. I think ChatGPT moment is as big as those. >> Dave: What do you see as the intersection of things like ChatGPT and the Supercloud? Of course, the media's going to focus, journalists are going to focus on all the negatives and the privacy. Okay. You know we're going to get by that, right? Always do. Where do you see the Supercloud and sort of the distributed data fitting in with ChatGPT? Does it use that as a data source? What's the link? >> Howie: I think there are number of use cases. One of the use cases, we talked about why we even have Supercloud because of the complexity, because of the, you know, heterogeneous nature of different clouds. In order for me as a developer, in order for me to create applications, I have so many things to worry about, right? It's a complexity. But with ChatGPT, with the AI, I don't have to worry about it, right? Those kind of details will be taken care of by, you know, the underlying layer. So we have been talking about on this show, you know, over the last, what, year or so about the Supercloud, hey, defining that, you know, API layer spanning across, you know, multiple clouds. I think that will be happening. However, for a lot of the things, that will be more hidden, right? A lot of that will be automated by the bots. You know, we were just talking about it right before the show. One of the profound statement I heard from Adrian Cockcroft about 10 years ago was, "Hey Howie, you know, at Netflix, right? You know, IT is just one API call away." That's a profound statement I heard about a decade ago. I think next decade, right? You know, the IT is just one English language away, right? So when it's one English language away, it's no longer as important, API this, API that. You still need API just like hardware, right? You still need all of those things. That's going to be more hidden. The high level thing will be more, you know, English language or the language, right? Any language for that matter. >> Dave: And so through language, you'll tap services that live across the Supercloud, is what you're saying? >> Howie: You just tell what you want, what you desire, right? You know, the bots will help you to figure out where the complexity is, right? You know, like you said, a lot of criticism about, "Hey, ChatGPT doesn't do this, doesn't do that." But if you think about how to break things down, right? For instance, right, you know, ChatGPT doesn't have Microsoft stock price today, obviously, right? However, you can ask ChatGPT to write a program for you, retrieve the Microsoft stock price, (laughs) and then just run it, right? >> Dave: Yeah. >> So the thing to think about- >> John: It's only going to get better. It's only going to get better. >> The thing people kind of unfairly criticize ChatGPT is it doesn't do this. But can you not break down humans' task into smaller things and get complex things to be done by the ChatGPT? I think we are there already, you know- >> John: That to me is the real game changer. That's the assembly of atomic elements at the top of the stack, whether the interface is voice or some programmatic gesture based thing, you know, wave your hand or- >> Howie: One of the analogy I used in my blog was, you know, each person, each professional now is a quarterback. And we suddenly have, you know, a lot more linebacks or you know, any backs to work for you, right? For free even, right? You know, and then that's sort of, you should think about it. You are the quarterback of your day-to-day job, right? Your job is not to do everything manually yourself. >> Dave: You call the play- >> Yes. >> Dave: And they execute. Do your job. >> Yes, exactly. >> Yeah, all the players are there. All the elves are in the North Pole making the toys, Dave, as we say. But this is the thing, I want to get your point. This change is going to require a new kind of infrastructure software relationship, a new kind of operating runtime, a new kind of assembler, a new kind of loader link things. This very operating systems kind of concepts. >> Data intensive, right? How to process the data, how to, you know, process so gigantic data in parallel, right? That's actually a tough job, right? So if you think about ChatGPT, why OpenAI is ahead of the game, right? You know, Google may not want to acknowledge it, right? It's not necessarily they do, you know, not have enough data scientist, but the software engineering pieces, you know, behind it, right? To train the model, to actually do all those things in parallel, to do all those things in a cost effective way. So I think, you know, a lot of those still- >> Let me ask you a question. Let me ask you a question because we've had this conversation privately, but I want to do it while we're on stage here. Where are all the alpha geeks and developers and creators and entrepreneurs going to gravitate to? You know, in every wave, you see it in crypto, all the alphas went into crypto. Now I think with ChatGPT, you're going to start to see, like, "Wow, it's that moment." A lot of people are going to, you know, scrum and do startups. CTOs will invent stuff. There's a lot of invention, a lot of computer science and customer requirements to figure out. That's new. Where are the alpha entrepreneurs going to go to? What do you think they're going to gravitate to? If you could point to the next layer to enable this super environment, super app environment, Supercloud. 'Cause there's a lot to do to enable what you just said. >> Howie: Right. You know, if you think about using internet as the analogy, right? You know, in the early 90s, internet came along, browser came along. You had two kind of companies, right? One is Amazon, the other one is walmart.com. And then there were company, like maybe GE or whatnot, right? Really didn't take advantage of internet that much. I think, you know, for entrepreneurs, suddenly created the Yahoo, Amazon of the ChatGPT native era. That's what we should be all excited about. But for most of the Fortune 500 companies, your job is to surviving sort of the big revolution. So you at least need to do your walmart.com sooner than later, right? (laughs) So not be like GE, right? You know, hand waving, hey, I do a lot of the internet, but you know, when you look back last 20, 30 years, what did they do much with leveraging the- >> So you think they're going to jump in, they're going to build service companies or SaaS tech companies or Supercloud companies? >> Howie: Okay, so there are two type of opportunities from that perspective. One is, you know, the OpenAI ish kind of the companies, I think the OpenAI, the game is still open, right? You know, it's really Close AI today. (laughs) >> John: There's room for competition, you mean? >> There's room for competition, right. You know, you can still spend you know, 50, $100 million to build something interesting. You know, there are company like Cohere and so on and so on. There are a bunch of companies, I think there is that. And then there are companies who's going to leverage those sort of the new AI primitives. I think, you know, we have been talking about AI forever, but finally, finally, it's no longer just good, but also super useful. I think, you know, the time is now. >> John: And if you have the cloud behind you, what do you make the Amazon do differently? 'Cause Amazon Web Services is only going to grow with this. It's not going to get smaller. There's more horsepower to handle, there's more needs. >> Howie: Well, Microsoft already showed what's the future, right? You know, you know, yes, there is a kind of the container, you know, the serverless that will continue to grow. But the future is really not about- >> John: Microsoft's shown the future? >> Well, showing that, you know, working with OpenAI, right? >> Oh okay. >> They already said that, you know, we are going to have ChatGPT service. >> $10 billion, I think they're putting it. >> $10 billion putting, and also open up the Open API services, right? You know, I actually made a prediction that Microsoft future hinges on OpenAI. I think, you know- >> John: They believe that $10 billion bet. >> Dave: Yeah. $10 billion bet. So I want to ask you a question. It's somewhat academic, but it's relevant. For a number of years, it looked like having first mover advantage wasn't an advantage. PCs, spreadsheets, the browser, right? Social media, Friendster, right? Mobile. Apple wasn't first to mobile. But that's somewhat changed. The cloud, AWS was first. You could debate whether or not, but AWS okay, they have first mover advantage. Crypto, Bitcoin, first mover advantage. Do you think OpenAI will have first mover advantage? >> It certainly has its advantage today. I think it's year two. I mean, I think the game is still out there, right? You know, we're still in the first inning, early inning of the game. So I don't think that the game is over for the rest of the players, whether the big players or the OpenAI kind of the, sort of competitors. So one of the VCs actually asked me the other day, right? "Hey, how much money do I need to spend, invest, to get, you know, another shot to the OpenAI sort of the level?" You know, I did a- (laughs) >> Line up. >> That's classic VC. "How much does it cost me to replicate?" >> I'm pretty sure he asked the question to a bunch of guys, right? >> Good luck with that. (laughs) >> So we kind of did some napkin- >> What'd you come up with? (laughs) >> $100 million is the order of magnitude that I came up with, right? You know, not a billion, not 10 million, right? So 100 million. >> John: Hundreds of millions. >> Yeah, yeah, yeah. 100 million order of magnitude is what I came up with. You know, we can get into details, you know, in other sort of the time, but- >> Dave: That's actually not that much if you think about it. >> Howie: Exactly. So when he heard me articulating why is that, you know, he's thinking, right? You know, he actually, you know, asked me, "Hey, you know, there's this company. Do you happen to know this company? Can I reach out?" You know, those things. So I truly believe it's not a billion or 10 billion issue, it's more like 100. >> John: And also, your other point about referencing the internet revolution as a good comparable. The other thing there is online user population was a big driver of the growth of that. So what's the equivalent here for online user population for AI? Is it more apps, more users? I mean, we're still early on, it's first inning. >> Yeah. We're kind of the, you know- >> What's the key metric for success of this sector? Do you have a read on that? >> I think the, you know, the number of users is a good metrics, but I think it's going to be a lot of people are going to use AI services without even knowing they're using it, right? You know, I think a lot of the applications are being already built on top of OpenAI, and then they are kind of, you know, help people to do marketing, legal documents, you know, so they're already inherently OpenAI kind of the users already. So I think yeah. >> Well, Howie, we've got to wrap, but I really appreciate you coming on. I want to give you a last minute to wrap up here. In your experience, and you've seen many waves of innovation. You've even had your hands in a lot of the big waves past three inflection points. And obviously, machine learning you're doing now, you're deep end. Why is this Supercloud movement, this wave of Supercloud and the discussion of this next inflection point, why is it so important? For the folks watching, why should they be paying attention to this particular moment in time? Could you share your super clip on Supercloud? >> Howie: Right. So this is simple from my point of view. So why do you even have cloud to begin with, right? IT is too complex, too complex to operate or too expensive. So there's a newer model. There is a better model, right? Let someone else operate it, there is elasticity out of it, right? That's great. Until you have multiple vendors, right? Many vendors even, you know, we're talking about kind of how to make multiple vendors look like the same, but frankly speaking, even one vendor has, you know, thousand services. Now it's kind of getting, what Kid was talking about what, cloud chaos, right? It's the evolution. You know, the history repeats itself, right? You know, you have, you know, next great things and then too many great things, and then people need to sort of abstract this out. So it's almost that you must do this. But I think how to abstract this out is something that at this time, AI is going to help a lot, right? You know, like I mentioned, right? A lot of the abstraction, you don't have to think about API anymore. I bet 10 years from now, you know, IT is one language away, not API away. So think about that world, right? So Supercloud in, in my opinion, sure, you kind of abstract things out. You have, you know, consistent layers. But who's going to do that? Is that like we all agreed upon the model, agreed upon those APIs? Not necessary. There are certain, you know, truth in that, but there are other truths, let bots take care of, right? Whether you know, I want some X happens, whether it's going to be done by Azure, by AWS, by GCP, bots will figure out at a given time with certain contacts with your security requirement, posture requirement. I'll think that out. >> John: That's awesome. And you know, Dave, you and I have been talking about this. We think scale is the new ratification. If you have first mover advantage, I'll see the benefit, but scale is a huge thing. OpenAI, AWS. >> Howie: Yeah. Every day, we are using OpenAI. Today, we are labeling data for them. So you know, that's a little bit of the- (laughs) >> John: Yeah. >> First mover advantage that other people don't have, right? So it's kind of scary. So I'm very sure that Google is a little bit- (laughs) >> When we do our super AI event, you're definitely going to be keynoting. (laughs) >> Howie: I think, you know, we're talking about Supercloud, you know, before long, we are going to talk about super intelligent cloud. (laughs) >> I'm super excited, Howie, about this. Thanks for coming on. Great to see you, Howie Xu. Always a great analyst for us contributing to the community. VP of Machine Learning and Zscaler, industry legend and friend of theCUBE. Thanks for coming on and sharing really, really great advice and insight into what this next wave means. This Supercloud is the next wave. "If you're not on it, you're driftwood," says Pat Gelsinger. So you're going to see a lot more discussion. We'll be back more here live in Palo Alto after this short break. >> Thank you. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
it all over the world. but you're kind of like a CUBE analyst. Great to see you, You wrote a great post about Kind of like seeing the So I really think, you know, Of course, the media's going to focus, will be more, you know, You know, like you said, John: It's only going to get better. I think we are there already, you know- you know, wave your hand or- or you know, any backs Do your job. making the toys, Dave, as we say. So I think, you know, A lot of people are going to, you know, I think, you know, for entrepreneurs, One is, you know, the OpenAI I think, you know, the time is now. John: And if you have You know, you know, yes, They already said that, you know, $10 billion, I think I think, you know- that $10 billion bet. So I want to ask you a question. to get, you know, another "How much does it cost me to replicate?" Good luck with that. You know, not a billion, into details, you know, if you think about it. You know, he actually, you know, asked me, the internet revolution We're kind of the, you know- I think the, you know, in a lot of the big waves You have, you know, consistent layers. And you know, Dave, you and I So you know, that's a little bit of the- So it's kind of scary. to be keynoting. Howie: I think, you know, This Supercloud is the next wave. (upbeat music)
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adrian Cockcroft | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Yahoo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Howie Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hundreds of millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
North Pole | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
next decade | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cohere | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first inning | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Machine Learning | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Supercloud 2 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
English | OTHER | 0.98+ |
each person | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two type | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
early 90s | DATE | 0.97+ |
Howie | PERSON | 0.97+ |
two kind | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one vendor | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one language | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each professional | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Jon Turow, Madrona Venture Group | CloudNativeSecurityCon 23
(upbeat music) >> Hello and welcome back to theCUBE. We're here in Palo Alto, California. I'm your host, John Furrier with a special guest here in the studio. As part of our Cloud Native SecurityCon Coverage we had an opportunity to bring in Jon Turow who is the partner at Madrona Venture Partners formerly with AWS and to talk about machine learning, foundational models, and how the future of AI is going to be impacted by some of the innovation around what's going on in the industry. ChatGPT has taken the world by storm. A million downloads, fastest to the million downloads there. Before some were saying it's just a gimmick. Others saying it's a game changer. Jon's here to break it down, and great to have you on. Thanks for coming in. >> Thanks John. Glad to be here. >> Thanks for coming on. So first of all, I'm glad you're here. First of all, because two things. One, you were formerly with AWS, got a lot of experience running projects at AWS. Now a partner at Madrona, a great firm doing great deals, and they had this future at modern application kind of thesis. Now you are putting out some content recently around foundational models. You're deep into computer vision. You were the IoT general manager at AWS among other things, Greengrass. So you know a lot about data. You know a lot about some of this automation, some of the edge stuff. You've been in the middle of all these kind of areas that now seem to be the next wave coming. So I wanted to ask you what your thoughts are of how the machine learning and this new automation wave is coming in, this AI tools are coming out. Is it a platform? Is it going to be smarter? What feeds AI? What's your take on this whole foundational big movement into AI? What's your general reaction to all this? >> So, thanks, Jon, again for having me here. Really excited to talk about these things. AI has been coming for a long time. It's been kind of the next big thing. Always just over the horizon for quite some time. And we've seen really compelling applications in generations before and until now. Amazon and AWS have introduced a lot of them. My firm, Madrona Venture Group has invested in some of those early players as well. But what we're seeing now is something categorically different. That's really exciting and feels like a durable change. And I can try and explain what that is. We have these really large models that are useful in a general way. They can be applied to a lot of different tasks beyond the specific task that the designers envisioned. That makes them more flexible, that makes them more useful for building applications than what we've seen before. And so that, we can talk about the depths of it, but in a nutshell, that's why I think people are really excited. >> And I think one of the things that you wrote about that jumped out at me is that this seems to be this moment where there's been a multiple decades of nerds and computer scientists and programmers and data thinkers around waiting for AI to blossom. And it's like they're scratching that itch. Every year is going to be, and it's like the bottleneck's always been compute power. And we've seen other areas, genome sequencing, all kinds of high computation things where required high forms computing. But now there's no real bottleneck to compute. You got cloud. And so you're starting to see the emergence of a massive acceleration of where AI's been and where it needs to be going. Now, it's almost like it's got a reboot. It's almost a renaissance in the AI community with a whole nother macro environmental things happening. Cloud, younger generation, applications proliferate from mobile to cloud native. It's the perfect storm for this kind of moment to switch over. Am I overreading that? Is that right? >> You're right. And it's been cooking for a cycle or two. And let me try and explain why that is. We have cloud and AWS launch in whatever it was, 2006, and offered more compute to more people than really was possible before. Initially that was about taking existing applications and running them more easily in a bigger scale. But in that period of time what's also become possible is new kinds of computation that really weren't practical or even possible without that vast amount of compute. And so one result that came of that is something called the transformer AI model architecture. And Google came out with that, published a paper in 2017. And what that says is, with a transformer model you can actually train an arbitrarily large amount of data into a model, and see what happens. That's what Google demonstrated in 2017. The what happens is the really exciting part because when you do that, what you start to see, when models exceed a certain size that we had never really seen before all of a sudden they get what we call emerging capabilities of complex reasoning and reasoning outside a domain and reasoning with data. The kinds of things that people describe as spooky when they play with something like ChatGPT. That's the underlying term. We don't as an industry quite know why it happens or how it happens, but we can measure that it does. So cloud enables new kinds of math and science. New kinds of math and science allow new kinds of experimentation. And that experimentation has led to this new generation of models. >> So one of the debates we had on theCUBE at our Supercloud event last month was, what's the barriers to entry for say OpenAI, for instance? Obviously, I weighed in aggressively and said, "The barriers for getting into cloud are high because all the CapEx." And Howie Xu formerly VMware, now at ZScaler, he's an AI machine learning guy. He was like, "Well, you can spend $100 million and replicate it." I saw a quote that set up for 180,000 I can get this other package. What's the barriers to entry? Is ChatGPT or OpenAI, does it have sustainability? Is it easy to get into? What is the market like for AI? I mean, because a lot of entrepreneurs are jumping in. I mean, I just read a story today. San Francisco's got more inbound migration because of the AI action happening, Seattle's booming, Boston with MIT's been working on neural networks for generations. That's what we've found the answer. Get off the neural network, Boston jump on the AI bus. So there's total excitement for this. People are enthusiastic around this area. >> You can think of an iPhone versus Android tension that's happening today. In the iPhone world, there are proprietary models from OpenAI who you might consider as the leader. There's Cohere, there's AI21, there's Anthropic, Google's going to have their own, and a few others. These are proprietary models that developers can build on top of, get started really quickly. They're measured to have the highest accuracy and the highest performance today. That's the proprietary side. On the other side, there is an open source part of the world. These are a proliferation of model architectures that developers and practitioners can take off the shelf and train themselves. Typically found in Hugging face. What people seem to think is that the accuracy and performance of the open source models is something like 18 to 20 months behind the accuracy and performance of the proprietary models. But on the other hand, there's infinite flexibility for teams that are capable enough. So you're going to see teams choose sides based on whether they want speed or flexibility. >> That's interesting. And that brings up a point I was talking to a startup and the debate was, do you abstract away from the hardware and be software-defined or software-led on the AI side and let the hardware side just extremely accelerate on its own, 'cause it's flywheel? So again, back to proprietary, that's with hardware kind of bundled in, bolted on. Is it accelerator or is it bolted on or is it part of it? So to me, I think that the big struggle in understanding this is that which one will end up being right. I mean, is it a beta max versus VHS kind of thing going on? Or iPhone, Android, I mean iPhone makes a lot of sense, but if you're Apple, but is there an Apple moment in the machine learning? >> In proprietary models, here does seem to be a jump ball. That there's going to be a virtuous flywheel that emerges that, for example, all these excitement about ChatGPT. What's really exciting about it is it's really easy to use. The technology isn't so different from what we've seen before even from OpenAI. You mentioned a million users in a short period of time, all providing training data for OpenAI that makes their underlying models, their next generation even better. So it's not unreasonable to guess that there's going to be power laws that emerge on the proprietary side. What I think history has shown is that iPhone, Android, Windows, Linux, there seems to be gravity towards this yin and yang. And my guess, and what other people seem to think is going to be the case is that we're going to continue to see these two poles of AI. >> So let's get into the relationship with data because I've been emerging myself with ChatGPT, fascinated by the ease of use, yes, but also the fidelity of how you query it. And I felt like when I was doing writing SQL back in the eighties and nineties where SQL was emerging. You had to be really a guru at the SQL to get the answers you wanted. It seems like the querying into ChatGPT is a good thing if you know how to talk to it. Labeling whether your input is and it does a great job if you feed it right. If you ask a generic questions like Google. It's like a Google search. It gives you great format, sounds credible, but the facts are kind of wrong. >> That's right. >> That's where general consensus is coming on. So what does that mean? That means people are on one hand saying, "Ah, it's bullshit 'cause it's wrong." But I look at, I'm like, "Wow, that's that's compelling." 'Cause if you feed it the right data, so now we're in the data modeling here, so the role of data's going to be critical. Is there a data operating system emerging? Because if this thing continues to go the way it's going you can almost imagine as you would look at companies to invest in. Who's going to be right on this? What's going to scale? What's sustainable? What could build a durable company? It might not look what like what people think it is. I mean, I remember when Google started everyone thought it was the worst search engine because it wasn't a portal. But it was the best organic search on the planet became successful. So I'm trying to figure out like, okay, how do you read this? How do you read the tea leaves? >> Yeah. There are a few different ways that companies can differentiate themselves. Teams with galactic capabilities to take an open source model and then change the architecture and retrain and go down to the silicon. They can do things that might not have been possible for other teams to do. There's a company that that we're proud to be investors in called RunwayML that provides video accelerated, sorry, AI accelerated video editing capabilities. They were used in everything, everywhere all at once and some others. In order to build RunwayML, they needed a vision of what the future was going to look like and they needed to make deep contributions to the science that was going to enable all that. But not every team has those capabilities, maybe nor should they. So as far as how other teams are going to differentiate there's a couple of things that they can do. One is called prompt engineering where they shape on behalf of their own users exactly how the prompt to get fed to the underlying model. It's not clear whether that's going to be a durable problem or whether like Google, we consumers are going to start to get more intuitive about this. That's one. The second is what's called information retrieval. How can I get information about the world outside, information from a database or a data store or whatever service into these models so they can reason about them. And the third is, this is going to sound funny, but attribution. Just like you would do in a news report or an academic paper. If you can state where your facts are coming from, the downstream consumer or the human being who has to use that information actually is going to be able to make better sense of it and rely better on it. So that's prompt engineering, that's retrieval, and that's attribution. >> So that brings me to my next point I want to dig in on is the foundational model stack that you published. And I'll start by saying that with ChatGPT, if you take out the naysayers who are like throwing cold water on it about being a gimmick or whatever, and then you got the other side, I would call the alpha nerds who are like they can see, "Wow, this is amazing." This is truly NextGen. This isn't yesterday's chatbot nonsense. They're like, they're all over it. It's that everybody's using it right now in every vertical. I heard someone using it for security logs. I heard a data center, hardware vendor using it for pushing out appsec review updates. I mean, I've heard corner cases. We're using it for theCUBE to put our metadata in. So there's a horizontal use case of value. So to me that tells me it's a market there. So when you have horizontal scalability in the use case you're going to have a stack. So you publish this stack and it has an application at the top, applications like Jasper out there. You're seeing ChatGPT. But you go after the bottom, you got silicon, cloud, foundational model operations, the foundational models themselves, tooling, sources, actions. Where'd you get this from? How'd you put this together? Did you just work backwards from the startups or was there a thesis behind this? Could you share your thoughts behind this foundational model stack? >> Sure. Well, I'm a recovering product manager and my job that I think about as a product manager is who is my customer and what problem he wants to solve. And so to put myself in the mindset of an application developer and a founder who is actually my customer as a partner at Madrona, I think about what technology and resources does she need to be really powerful, to be able to take a brilliant idea, and actually bring that to life. And if you spend time with that community, which I do and I've met with hundreds of founders now who are trying to do exactly this, you can see that the stack is emerging. In fact, we first drew it in, not in January 2023, but October 2022. And if you look at the difference between the October '22 and January '23 stacks you're going to see that holes in the stack that we identified in October around tooling and around foundation model ops and the rest are organically starting to get filled because of how much demand from the developers at the top of the stack. >> If you look at the young generation coming out and even some of the analysts, I was just reading an analyst report on who's following the whole data stacks area, Databricks, Snowflake, there's variety of analytics, realtime AI, data's hot. There's a lot of engineers coming out that were either data scientists or I would call data platform engineering folks are becoming very key resources in this area. What's the skillset emerging and what's the mindset of that entrepreneur that sees the opportunity? How does these startups come together? Is there a pattern in the formation? Is there a pattern in the competency or proficiency around the talent behind these ventures? >> Yes. I would say there's two groups. The first is a very distinct pattern, John. For the past 10 years or a little more we've seen a pattern of democratization of ML where more and more people had access to this powerful science and technology. And since about 2017, with the rise of the transformer architecture in these foundation models, that pattern has reversed. All of a sudden what has become broader access is now shrinking to a pretty small group of scientists who can actually train and manipulate the architectures of these models themselves. So that's one. And what that means is the teams who can do that have huge ability to make the future happen in ways that other people don't have access to yet. That's one. The second is there is a broader population of people who by definition has even more collective imagination 'cause there's even more people who sees what should be possible and can use things like the proprietary models, like the OpenAI models that are available off the shelf and try to create something that maybe nobody has seen before. And when they do that, Jasper AI is a great example of that. Jasper AI is a company that creates marketing copy automatically with generative models such as GPT-3. They do that and it's really useful and it's almost fun for a marketer to use that. But there are going to be questions of how they can defend that against someone else who has access to the same technology. It's a different population of founders who has to find other sources of differentiation without being able to go all the way down to the the silicon and the science. >> Yeah, and it's going to be also opportunity recognition is one thing. Building a viable venture product market fit. You got competition. And so when things get crowded you got to have some differentiation. I think that's going to be the key. And that's where I was trying to figure out and I think data with scale I think are big ones. Where's the vulnerability in the stack in terms of gaps? Where's the white space? I shouldn't say vulnerability. I should say where's the opportunity, where's the white space in the stack that you see opportunities for entrepreneurs to attack? >> I would say there's two. At the application level, there is almost infinite opportunity, John, because almost every kind of application is about to be reimagined or disrupted with a new generation that takes advantage of this really powerful new technology. And so if there is a kind of application in almost any vertical, it's hard to rule something out. Almost any vertical that a founder wishes she had created the original app in, well, now it's her time. So that's one. The second is, if you look at the tooling layer that we discussed, tooling is a really powerful way that you can provide more flexibility to app developers to get more differentiation for themselves. And the tooling layer is still forming. This is the interface between the models themselves and the applications. Tools that help bring in data, as you mentioned, connect to external actions, bring context across multiple calls, chain together multiple models. These kinds of things, there's huge opportunity there. >> Well, Jon, I really appreciate you coming in. I had a couple more questions, but I will take a minute to read some of your bios for the audience and we'll get into, I won't embarrass you, but I want to set the context. You said you were recovering product manager, 10 plus years at AWS. Obviously, recovering from AWS, which is a whole nother dimension of recovering. In all seriousness, I talked to Andy Jassy around that time and Dr. Matt Wood and it was about that time when AI was just getting on the radar when they started. So you guys started seeing the wave coming in early on. So I remember at that time as Amazon was starting to grow significantly and even just stock price and overall growth. From a tech perspective, it was pretty clear what was coming, so you were there when this tsunami hit. >> Jon: That's right. >> And you had a front row seat building tech, you were led the product teams for Computer Vision AI, Textract, AI intelligence for document processing, recognition for image and video analysis. You wrote the business product plan for AWS IoT and Greengrass, which we've covered a lot in theCUBE, which extends out to the whole edge thing. So you know a lot about AI/ML, edge computing, IOT, messaging, which I call the law of small numbers that scale become big. This is a big new thing. So as a former AWS leader who's been there and at Madrona, what's your investment thesis as you start to peruse the landscape and talk to entrepreneurs as you got the stack? What's the big picture? What are you looking for? What's the thesis? How do you see this next five years emerging? >> Five years is a really long time given some of this science is only six months out. I'll start with some, no pun intended, some foundational things. And we can talk about some implications of the technology. The basics are the same as they've always been. We want, what I like to call customers with their hair on fire. So they have problems, so urgent they'll buy half a product. The joke is if your hair is on fire you might want a bucket of cold water, but you'll take a tennis racket and you'll beat yourself over the head to put the fire out. You want those customers 'cause they'll meet you more than halfway. And when you find them, you can obsess about them and you can get better every day. So we want customers with their hair on fire. We want founders who have empathy for those customers, understand what is going to be required to serve them really well, and have what I like to call founder-market fit to be able to build the products that those customers are going to need. >> And because that's a good strategy from an emerging, not yet fully baked out requirements definition. >> Jon: That's right. >> Enough where directionally they're leaning in, more than in, they're part of the product development process. >> That's right. And when you're doing early stage development, which is where I personally spend a lot of my time at the seed and A and a little bit beyond that stage often that's going to be what you have to go on because the future is going to be so complex that you can't see the curves beyond it. But if you have customers with their hair on fire and talented founders who have the capability to serve those customers, that's got me interested. >> So if I'm an entrepreneur, I walk in and say, "I have customers that have their hair on fire." What kind of checks do you write? What's the kind of the average you're seeing for seed and series? Probably seed, seed rounds and series As. >> It can depend. I have seen seed rounds of double digit million dollars. I have seen seed rounds much smaller than that. It really depends on what is going to be the right thing for these founders to prove out the hypothesis that they're testing that says, "Look, we have this customer with her hair on fire. We think we can build at least a tennis racket that she can use to start beating herself over the head and put the fire out. And then we're going to have something really interesting that we can scale up from there and we can make the future happen. >> So it sounds like your advice to founders is go out and find some customers, show them a product, don't obsess over full completion, get some sort of vibe on fit and go from there. >> Yeah, and I think by the time founders come to me they may not have a product, they may not have a deck, but if they have a customer with her hair on fire, then I'm really interested. >> Well, I always love the professional services angle on these markets. You go in and you get some business and you understand it. Walk away if you don't like it, but you see the hair on fire, then you go in product mode. >> That's right. >> All Right, Jon, thank you for coming on theCUBE. Really appreciate you stopping by the studio and good luck on your investments. Great to see you. >> You too. >> Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you, Jon. >> CUBE coverage here at Palo Alto. I'm John Furrier, your host. More coverage with CUBE Conversations after this break. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and great to have you on. that now seem to be the next wave coming. It's been kind of the next big thing. is that this seems to be this moment and offered more compute to more people What's the barriers to entry? is that the accuracy and the debate was, do you that there's going to be power laws but also the fidelity of how you query it. going to be critical. exactly how the prompt to get So that brings me to my next point and actually bring that to life. and even some of the analysts, But there are going to be questions Yeah, and it's going to be and the applications. the radar when they started. and talk to entrepreneurs the head to put the fire out. And because that's a good of the product development process. that you can't see the curves beyond it. What kind of checks do you write? and put the fire out. to founders is go out time founders come to me and you understand it. stopping by the studio More coverage with CUBE
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
January 2023 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jon Turow | PERSON | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
18 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
October 2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Madrona | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Madrona Venture Partners | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
January '23 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two groups | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Matt Wood | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Madrona Venture Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
180,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
October '22 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jasper | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2006 | DATE | 0.99+ |
million downloads | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SQL | TITLE | 0.99+ |
last month | DATE | 0.99+ |
two poles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Howie Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Greengrass | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Madrona Venture Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Supercloud | EVENT | 0.98+ |
RunwayML | TITLE | 0.98+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
ZScaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
eighties | DATE | 0.97+ |
ChatGPT | TITLE | 0.96+ |
Dr. | PERSON | 0.96+ |
Breaking Analysis: Enterprise Technology Predictions 2023
(upbeat music beginning) >> From the Cube Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from the Cube and ETR, this is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> Making predictions about the future of enterprise tech is more challenging if you strive to lay down forecasts that are measurable. In other words, if you make a prediction, you should be able to look back a year later and say, with some degree of certainty, whether the prediction came true or not, with evidence to back that up. Hello and welcome to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights, powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis, we aim to do just that, with predictions about the macro IT spending environment, cost optimization, security, lots to talk about there, generative AI, cloud, and of course supercloud, blockchain adoption, data platforms, including commentary on Databricks, snowflake, and other key players, automation, events, and we may even have some bonus predictions around quantum computing, and perhaps some other areas. To make all this happen, we welcome back, for the third year in a row, my colleague and friend Eric Bradley from ETR. Eric, thanks for all you do for the community, and thanks for being part of this program. Again. >> I wouldn't miss it for the world. I always enjoy this one. Dave, good to see you. >> Yeah, so let me bring up this next slide and show you, actually come back to me if you would. I got to show the audience this. These are the inbounds that we got from PR firms starting in October around predictions. They know we do prediction posts. And so they'll send literally thousands and thousands of predictions from hundreds of experts in the industry, technologists, consultants, et cetera. And if you bring up the slide I can show you sort of the pattern that developed here. 40% of these thousands of predictions were from cyber. You had AI and data. If you combine those, it's still not close to cyber. Cost optimization was a big thing. Of course, cloud, some on DevOps, and software. Digital... Digital transformation got, you know, some lip service and SaaS. And then there was other, it's kind of around 2%. So quite remarkable, when you think about the focus on cyber, Eric. >> Yeah, there's two reasons why I think it makes sense, though. One, the cybersecurity companies have a lot of cash, so therefore the PR firms might be working a little bit harder for them than some of their other clients. (laughs) And then secondly, as you know, for multiple years now, when we do our macro survey, we ask, "What's your number one spending priority?" And again, it's security. It just isn't going anywhere. It just stays at the top. So I'm actually not that surprised by that little pie chart there, but I was shocked that SaaS was only 5%. You know, going back 10 years ago, that would've been the only thing anyone was talking about. >> Yeah. So true. All right, let's get into it. First prediction, we always start with kind of tech spending. Number one is tech spending increases between four and 5%. ETR has currently got it at 4.6% coming into 2023. This has been a consistently downward trend all year. We started, you know, much, much higher as we've been reporting. Bottom line is the fed is still in control. They're going to ease up on tightening, is the expectation, they're going to shoot for a soft landing. But you know, my feeling is this slingshot economy is going to continue, and it's going to continue to confound, whether it's supply chains or spending. The, the interesting thing about the ETR data, Eric, and I want you to comment on this, the largest companies are the most aggressive to cut. They're laying off, smaller firms are spending faster. They're actually growing at a much larger, faster rate as are companies in EMEA. And that's a surprise. That's outpacing the US and APAC. Chime in on this, Eric. >> Yeah, I was surprised on all of that. First on the higher level spending, we are definitely seeing it coming down, but the interesting thing here is headlines are making it worse. The huge research shop recently said 0% growth. We're coming in at 4.6%. And just so everyone knows, this is not us guessing, we asked 1,525 IT decision-makers what their budget growth will be, and they came in at 4.6%. Now there's a huge disparity, as you mentioned. The Fortune 500, global 2000, barely at 2% growth, but small, it's at 7%. So we're at a situation right now where the smaller companies are still playing a little bit of catch up on digital transformation, and they're spending money. The largest companies that have the most to lose from a recession are being more trepidatious, obviously. So they're playing a "Wait and see." And I hope we don't talk ourselves into a recession. Certainly the headlines and some of their research shops are helping it along. But another interesting comment here is, you know, energy and utilities used to be called an orphan and widow stock group, right? They are spending more than anyone, more than financials insurance, more than retail consumer. So right now it's being driven by mid, small, and energy and utilities. They're all spending like gangbusters, like nothing's happening. And it's the rest of everyone else that's being very cautious. >> Yeah, so very unpredictable right now. All right, let's go to number two. Cost optimization remains a major theme in 2023. We've been reporting on this. You've, we've shown a chart here. What's the primary method that your organization plans to use? You asked this question of those individuals that cited that they were going to reduce their spend and- >> Mhm. >> consolidating redundant vendors, you know, still leads the way, you know, far behind, cloud optimization is second, but it, but cloud continues to outpace legacy on-prem spending, no doubt. Somebody, it was, the guy's name was Alexander Feiglstorfer from Storyblok, sent in a prediction, said "All in one becomes extinct." Now, generally I would say I disagree with that because, you know, as we know over the years, suites tend to win out over, you know, individual, you know, point products. But I think what's going to happen is all in one is going to remain the norm for these larger companies that are cutting back. They want to consolidate redundant vendors, and the smaller companies are going to stick with that best of breed and be more aggressive and try to compete more effectively. What's your take on that? >> Yeah, I'm seeing much more consolidation in vendors, but also consolidation in functionality. We're seeing people building out new functionality, whether it's, we're going to talk about this later, so I don't want to steal too much of our thunder right now, but data and security also, we're seeing a functionality creep. So I think there's further consolidation happening here. I think niche solutions are going to be less likely, and platform solutions are going to be more likely in a spending environment where you want to reduce your vendors. You want to have one bill to pay, not 10. Another thing on this slide, real quick if I can before I move on, is we had a bunch of people write in and some of the answer options that aren't on this graph but did get cited a lot, unfortunately, is the obvious reduction in staff, hiring freezes, and delaying hardware, were three of the top write-ins. And another one was offshore outsourcing. So in addition to what we're seeing here, there were a lot of write-in options, and I just thought it would be important to state that, but essentially the cost optimization is by and far the highest one, and it's growing. So it's actually increased in our citations over the last year. >> And yeah, specifically consolidating redundant vendors. And so I actually thank you for bringing that other up, 'cause I had asked you, Eric, is there any evidence that repatriation is going on and we don't see it in the numbers, we don't see it even in the other, there was, I think very little or no mention of cloud repatriation, even though it might be happening in this in a smattering. >> Not a single mention, not one single mention. I went through it for you. Yep. Not one write-in. >> All right, let's move on. Number three, security leads M&A in 2023. Now you might say, "Oh, well that's a layup," but let me set this up Eric, because I didn't really do a great job with the slide. I hid the, what you've done, because you basically took, this is from the emerging technology survey with 1,181 responses from November. And what we did is we took Palo Alto and looked at the overlap in Palo Alto Networks accounts with these vendors that were showing on this chart. And Eric, I'm going to ask you to explain why we put a circle around OneTrust, but let me just set it up, and then have you comment on the slide and take, give us more detail. We're seeing private company valuations are off, you know, 10 to 40%. We saw a sneak, do a down round, but pretty good actually only down 12%. We've seen much higher down rounds. Palo Alto Networks we think is going to get busy. Again, they're an inquisitive company, they've been sort of quiet lately, and we think CrowdStrike, Cisco, Microsoft, Zscaler, we're predicting all of those will make some acquisitions and we're thinking that the targets are somewhere in this mess of security taxonomy. Other thing we're predicting AI meets cyber big time in 2023, we're going to probably going to see some acquisitions of those companies that are leaning into AI. We've seen some of that with Palo Alto. And then, you know, your comment to me, Eric, was "The RSA conference is going to be insane, hopping mad, "crazy this April," (Eric laughing) but give us your take on this data, and why the red circle around OneTrust? Take us back to that slide if you would, Alex. >> Sure. There's a few things here. First, let me explain what we're looking at. So because we separate the public companies and the private companies into two separate surveys, this allows us the ability to cross-reference that data. So what we're doing here is in our public survey, the tesis, everyone who cited some spending with Palo Alto, meaning they're a Palo Alto customer, we then cross-reference that with the private tech companies. Who also are they spending with? So what you're seeing here is an overlap. These companies that we have circled are doing the best in Palo Alto's accounts. Now, Palo Alto went and bought Twistlock a few years ago, which this data slide predicted, to be quite honest. And so I don't know if they necessarily are going to go after Snyk. Snyk, sorry. They already have something in that space. What they do need, however, is more on the authentication space. So I'm looking at OneTrust, with a 45% overlap in their overall net sentiment. That is a company that's already existing in their accounts and could be very synergistic to them. BeyondTrust as well, authentication identity. This is something that Palo needs to do to move more down that zero trust path. Now why did I pick Palo first? Because usually they're very inquisitive. They've been a little quiet lately. Secondly, if you look at the backdrop in the markets, the IPO freeze isn't going to last forever. Sooner or later, the IPO markets are going to open up, and some of these private companies are going to tap into public equity. In the meantime, however, cash funding on the private side is drying up. If they need another round, they're not going to get it, and they're certainly not going to get it at the valuations they were getting. So we're seeing valuations maybe come down where they're a touch more attractive, and Palo knows this isn't going to last forever. Cisco knows that, CrowdStrike, Zscaler, all these companies that are trying to make a push to become that vendor that you're consolidating in, around, they have a chance now, they have a window where they need to go make some acquisitions. And that's why I believe leading up to RSA, we're going to see some movement. I think it's going to pretty, a really exciting time in security right now. >> Awesome. Thank you. Great explanation. All right, let's go on the next one. Number four is, it relates to security. Let's stay there. Zero trust moves from hype to reality in 2023. Now again, you might say, "Oh yeah, that's a layup." A lot of these inbounds that we got are very, you know, kind of self-serving, but we always try to put some meat in the bone. So first thing we do is we pull out some commentary from, Eric, your roundtable, your insights roundtable. And we have a CISO from a global hospitality firm says, "For me that's the highest priority." He's talking about zero trust because it's the best ROI, it's the most forward-looking, and it enables a lot of the business transformation activities that we want to do. CISOs tell me that they actually can drive forward transformation projects that have zero trust, and because they can accelerate them, because they don't have to go through the hurdle of, you know, getting, making sure that it's secure. Second comment, zero trust closes that last mile where once you're authenticated, they open up the resource to you in a zero trust way. That's a CISO of a, and a managing director of a cyber risk services enterprise. Your thoughts on this? >> I can be here all day, so I'm going to try to be quick on this one. This is not a fluff piece on this one. There's a couple of other reasons this is happening. One, the board finally gets it. Zero trust at first was just a marketing hype term. Now the board understands it, and that's why CISOs are able to push through it. And what they finally did was redefine what it means. Zero trust simply means moving away from hardware security, moving towards software-defined security, with authentication as its base. The board finally gets that, and now they understand that this is necessary and it's being moved forward. The other reason it's happening now is hybrid work is here to stay. We weren't really sure at first, large companies were still trying to push people back to the office, and it's going to happen. The pendulum will swing back, but hybrid work's not going anywhere. By basically on our own data, we're seeing that 69% of companies expect remote and hybrid to be permanent, with only 30% permanent in office. Zero trust works for a hybrid environment. So all of that is the reason why this is happening right now. And going back to our previous prediction, this is why we're picking Palo, this is why we're picking Zscaler to make these acquisitions. Palo Alto needs to be better on the authentication side, and so does Zscaler. They're both fantastic on zero trust network access, but they need the authentication software defined aspect, and that's why we think this is going to happen. One last thing, in that CISO round table, I also had somebody say, "Listen, Zscaler is incredible. "They're doing incredibly well pervading the enterprise, "but their pricing's getting a little high," and they actually think Palo Alto is well-suited to start taking some of that share, if Palo can make one move. >> Yeah, Palo Alto's consolidation story is very strong. Here's my question and challenge. Do you and me, so I'm always hardcore about, okay, you've got to have evidence. I want to look back at these things a year from now and say, "Did we get it right? Yes or no?" If we got it wrong, we'll tell you we got it wrong. So how are we going to measure this? I'd say a couple things, and you can chime in. One is just the number of vendors talking about it. That's, but the marketing always leads the reality. So the second part of that is we got to get evidence from the buying community. Can you help us with that? >> (laughs) Luckily, that's what I do. I have a data company that asks thousands of IT decision-makers what they're adopting and what they're increasing spend on, as well as what they're decreasing spend on and what they're replacing. So I have snapshots in time over the last 11 years where I can go ahead and compare and contrast whether this adoption is happening or not. So come back to me in 12 months and I'll let you know. >> Now, you know, I will. Okay, let's bring up the next one. Number five, generative AI hits where the Metaverse missed. Of course everybody's talking about ChatGPT, we just wrote last week in a breaking analysis with John Furrier and Sarjeet Joha our take on that. We think 2023 does mark a pivot point as natural language processing really infiltrates enterprise tech just as Amazon turned the data center into an API. We think going forward, you're going to be interacting with technology through natural language, through English commands or other, you know, foreign language commands, and investors are lining up, all the VCs are getting excited about creating something competitive to ChatGPT, according to (indistinct) a hundred million dollars gets you a seat at the table, gets you into the game. (laughing) That's before you have to start doing promotion. But he thinks that's what it takes to actually create a clone or something equivalent. We've seen stuff from, you know, the head of Facebook's, you know, AI saying, "Oh, it's really not that sophisticated, ChatGPT, "it's kind of like IBM Watson, it's great engineering, "but you know, we've got more advanced technology." We know Google's working on some really interesting stuff. But here's the thing. ETR just launched this survey for the February survey. It's in the field now. We circle open AI in this category. They weren't even in the survey, Eric, last quarter. So 52% of the ETR survey respondents indicated a positive sentiment toward open AI. I added up all the sort of different bars, we could double click on that. And then I got this inbound from Scott Stevenson of Deep Graham. He said "AI is recession-proof." I don't know if that's the case, but it's a good quote. So bring this back up and take us through this. Explain this chart for us, if you would. >> First of all, I like Scott's quote better than the Facebook one. I think that's some sour grapes. Meta just spent an insane amount of money on the Metaverse and that's a dud. Microsoft just spent money on open AI and it is hot, undoubtedly hot. We've only been in the field with our current ETS survey for a week. So my caveat is it's preliminary data, but I don't care if it's preliminary data. (laughing) We're getting a sneak peek here at what is the number one net sentiment and mindshare leader in the entire machine-learning AI sector within a week. It's beating Data- >> 600. 600 in. >> It's beating Databricks. And we all know Databricks is a huge established enterprise company, not only in machine-learning AI, but it's in the top 10 in the entire survey. We have over 400 vendors in this survey. It's number eight overall, already. In a week. This is not hype. This is real. And I could go on the NLP stuff for a while. Not only here are we seeing it in open AI and machine-learning and AI, but we're seeing NLP in security. It's huge in email security. It's completely transforming that area. It's one of the reasons I thought Palo might take Abnormal out. They're doing such a great job with NLP in this email side, and also in the data prep tools. NLP is going to take out data prep tools. If we have time, I'll discuss that later. But yeah, this is, to me this is a no-brainer, and we're already seeing it in the data. >> Yeah, John Furrier called, you know, the ChatGPT introduction. He said it reminded him of the Netscape moment, when we all first saw Netscape Navigator and went, "Wow, it really could be transformative." All right, number six, the cloud expands to supercloud as edge computing accelerates and CloudFlare is a big winner in 2023. We've reported obviously on cloud, multi-cloud, supercloud and CloudFlare, basically saying what multi-cloud should have been. We pulled this quote from Atif Kahn, who is the founder and CTO of Alkira, thanks, one of the inbounds, thank you. "In 2023, highly distributed IT environments "will become more the norm "as organizations increasingly deploy hybrid cloud, "multi-cloud and edge settings..." Eric, from one of your round tables, "If my sources from edge computing are coming "from the cloud, that means I have my workloads "running in the cloud. "There is no one better than CloudFlare," That's a senior director of IT architecture at a huge financial firm. And then your analysis shows CloudFlare really growing in pervasion, that sort of market presence in the dataset, dramatically, to near 20%, leading, I think you had told me that they're even ahead of Google Cloud in terms of momentum right now. >> That was probably the biggest shock to me in our January 2023 tesis, which covers the public companies in the cloud computing sector. CloudFlare has now overtaken GCP in overall spending, and I was shocked by that. It's already extremely pervasive in networking, of course, for the edge networking side, and also in security. This is the number one leader in SaaSi, web access firewall, DDoS, bot protection, by your definition of supercloud, which we just did a couple of weeks ago, and I really enjoyed that by the way Dave, I think CloudFlare is the one that fits your definition best, because it's bringing all of these aspects together, and most importantly, it's cloud agnostic. It does not need to rely on Azure or AWS to do this. It has its own cloud. So I just think it's, when we look at your definition of supercloud, CloudFlare is the poster child. >> You know, what's interesting about that too, is a lot of people are poo-pooing CloudFlare, "Ah, it's, you know, really kind of not that sophisticated." "You don't have as many tools," but to your point, you're can have those tools in the cloud, Cloudflare's doing serverless on steroids, trying to keep things really simple, doing a phenomenal job at, you know, various locations around the world. And they're definitely one to watch. Somebody put them on my radar (laughing) a while ago and said, "Dave, you got to do a breaking analysis on CloudFlare." And so I want to thank that person. I can't really name them, 'cause they work inside of a giant hyperscaler. But- (Eric laughing) (Dave chuckling) >> Real quickly, if I can from a competitive perspective too, who else is there? They've already taken share from Akamai, and Fastly is their really only other direct comp, and they're not there. And these guys are in poll position and they're the only game in town right now. I just, I don't see it slowing down. >> I thought one of your comments from your roundtable I was reading, one of the folks said, you know, CloudFlare, if my workloads are in the cloud, they are, you know, dominant, they said not as strong with on-prem. And so Akamai is doing better there. I'm like, "Okay, where would you want to be?" (laughing) >> Yeah, which one of those two would you rather be? >> Right? Anyway, all right, let's move on. Number seven, blockchain continues to look for a home in the enterprise, but devs will slowly begin to adopt in 2023. You know, blockchains have got a lot of buzz, obviously crypto is, you know, the killer app for blockchain. Senior IT architect in financial services from your, one of your insight roundtables said quote, "For enterprises to adopt a new technology, "there have to be proven turnkey solutions. "My experience in talking with my peers are, "blockchain is still an open-source component "where you have to build around it." Now I want to thank Ravi Mayuram, who's the CTO of Couchbase sent in, you know, one of the predictions, he said, "DevOps will adopt blockchain, specifically Ethereum." And he referenced actually in his email to me, Solidity, which is the programming language for Ethereum, "will be in every DevOps pro's playbook, "mirroring the boom in machine-learning. "Newer programming languages like Solidity "will enter the toolkits of devs." His point there, you know, Solidity for those of you don't know, you know, Bitcoin is not programmable. Solidity, you know, came out and that was their whole shtick, and they've been improving that, and so forth. But it, Eric, it's true, it really hasn't found its home despite, you know, the potential for smart contracts. IBM's pushing it, VMware has had announcements, and others, really hasn't found its way in the enterprise yet. >> Yeah, and I got to be honest, I don't think it's going to, either. So when we did our top trends series, this was basically chosen as an anti-prediction, I would guess, that it just continues to not gain hold. And the reason why was that first comment, right? It's very much a niche solution that requires a ton of custom work around it. You can't just plug and play it. And at the end of the day, let's be very real what this technology is, it's a database ledger, and we already have database ledgers in the enterprise. So why is this a priority to move to a different database ledger? It's going to be very niche cases. I like the CTO comment from Couchbase about it being adopted by DevOps. I agree with that, but it has to be a DevOps in a very specific use case, and a very sophisticated use case in financial services, most likely. And that's not across the entire enterprise. So I just think it's still going to struggle to get its foothold for a little bit longer, if ever. >> Great, thanks. Okay, let's move on. Number eight, AWS Databricks, Google Snowflake lead the data charge with Microsoft. Keeping it simple. So let's unpack this a little bit. This is the shared accounts peer position for, I pulled data platforms in for analytics, machine-learning and AI and database. So I could grab all these accounts or these vendors and see how they compare in those three sectors. Analytics, machine-learning and database. Snowflake and Databricks, you know, they're on a crash course, as you and I have talked about. They're battling to be the single source of truth in analytics. They're, there's going to be a big focus. They're already started. It's going to be accelerated in 2023 on open formats. Iceberg, Python, you know, they're all the rage. We heard about Iceberg at Snowflake Summit, last summer or last June. Not a lot of people had heard of it, but of course the Databricks crowd, who knows it well. A lot of other open source tooling. There's a company called DBT Labs, which you're going to talk about in a minute. George Gilbert put them on our radar. We just had Tristan Handy, the CEO of DBT labs, on at supercloud last week. They are a new disruptor in data that's, they're essentially making, they're API-ifying, if you will, KPIs inside the data warehouse and dramatically simplifying that whole data pipeline. So really, you know, the ETL guys should be shaking in their boots with them. Coming back to the slide. Google really remains focused on BigQuery adoption. Customers have complained to me that they would like to use Snowflake with Google's AI tools, but they're being forced to go to BigQuery. I got to ask Google about that. AWS continues to stitch together its bespoke data stores, that's gone down that "Right tool for the right job" path. David Foyer two years ago said, "AWS absolutely is going to have to solve that problem." We saw them start to do it in, at Reinvent, bringing together NoETL between Aurora and Redshift, and really trying to simplify those worlds. There's going to be more of that. And then Microsoft, they're just making it cheap and easy to use their stuff, you know, despite some of the complaints that we hear in the community, you know, about things like Cosmos, but Eric, your take? >> Yeah, my concern here is that Snowflake and Databricks are fighting each other, and it's allowing AWS and Microsoft to kind of catch up against them, and I don't know if that's the right move for either of those two companies individually, Azure and AWS are building out functionality. Are they as good? No they're not. The other thing to remember too is that AWS and Azure get paid anyway, because both Databricks and Snowflake run on top of 'em. So (laughing) they're basically collecting their toll, while these two fight it out with each other, and they build out functionality. I think they need to stop focusing on each other, a little bit, and think about the overall strategy. Now for Databricks, we know they came out first as a machine-learning AI tool. They were known better for that spot, and now they're really trying to play catch-up on that data storage compute spot, and inversely for Snowflake, they were killing it with the compute separation from storage, and now they're trying to get into the MLAI spot. I actually wouldn't be surprised to see them make some sort of acquisition. Frank Slootman has been a little bit quiet, in my opinion there. The other thing to mention is your comment about DBT Labs. If we look at our emerging technology survey, last survey when this came out, DBT labs, number one leader in that data integration space, I'm going to just pull it up real quickly. It looks like they had a 33% overall net sentiment to lead data analytics integration. So they are clearly growing, it's fourth straight survey consecutively that they've grown. The other name we're seeing there a little bit is Cribl, but DBT labs is by far the number one player in this space. >> All right. Okay, cool. Moving on, let's go to number nine. With Automation mixer resurgence in 2023, we're showing again data. The x axis is overlap or presence in the dataset, and the vertical axis is shared net score. Net score is a measure of spending momentum. As always, you've seen UI path and Microsoft Power Automate up until the right, that red line, that 40% line is generally considered elevated. UI path is really separating, creating some distance from Automation Anywhere, they, you know, previous quarters they were much closer. Microsoft Power Automate came on the scene in a big way, they loom large with this "Good enough" approach. I will say this, I, somebody sent me a results of a (indistinct) survey, which showed UiPath actually had more mentions than Power Automate, which was surprising, but I think that's not been the case in the ETR data set. We're definitely seeing a shift from back office to front soft office kind of workloads. Having said that, software testing is emerging as a mainstream use case, we're seeing ML and AI become embedded in end-to-end automations, and low-code is serving the line of business. And so this, we think, is going to increasingly have appeal to organizations in the coming year, who want to automate as much as possible and not necessarily, we've seen a lot of layoffs in tech, and people... You're going to have to fill the gaps with automation. That's a trend that's going to continue. >> Yep, agreed. At first that comment about Microsoft Power Automate having less citations than UiPath, that's shocking to me. I'm looking at my chart right here where Microsoft Power Automate was cited by over 60% of our entire survey takers, and UiPath at around 38%. Now don't get me wrong, 38% pervasion's fantastic, but you know you're not going to beat an entrenched Microsoft. So I don't really know where that comment came from. So UiPath, looking at it alone, it's doing incredibly well. It had a huge rebound in its net score this last survey. It had dropped going through the back half of 2022, but we saw a big spike in the last one. So it's got a net score of over 55%. A lot of people citing adoption and increasing. So that's really what you want to see for a name like this. The problem is that just Microsoft is doing its playbook. At the end of the day, I'm going to do a POC, why am I going to pay more for UiPath, or even take on another separate bill, when we know everyone's consolidating vendors, if my license already includes Microsoft Power Automate? It might not be perfect, it might not be as good, but what I'm hearing all the time is it's good enough, and I really don't want another invoice. >> Right. So how does UiPath, you know, and Automation Anywhere, how do they compete with that? Well, the way they compete with it is they got to have a better product. They got a product that's 10 times better. You know, they- >> Right. >> they're not going to compete based on where the lowest cost, Microsoft's got that locked up, or where the easiest to, you know, Microsoft basically give it away for free, and that's their playbook. So that's, you know, up to UiPath. UiPath brought on Rob Ensslin, I've interviewed him. Very, very capable individual, is now Co-CEO. So he's kind of bringing that adult supervision in, and really tightening up the go to market. So, you know, we know this company has been a rocket ship, and so getting some control on that and really getting focused like a laser, you know, could be good things ahead there for that company. Okay. >> One of the problems, if I could real quick Dave, is what the use cases are. When we first came out with RPA, everyone was super excited about like, "No, UiPath is going to be great for super powerful "projects, use cases." That's not what RPA is being used for. As you mentioned, it's being used for mundane tasks, so it's not automating complex things, which I think UiPath was built for. So if you were going to get UiPath, and choose that over Microsoft, it's going to be 'cause you're doing it for more powerful use case, where it is better. But the problem is that's not where the enterprise is using it. The enterprise are using this for base rote tasks, and simply, Microsoft Power Automate can do that. >> Yeah, it's interesting. I've had people on theCube that are both Microsoft Power Automate customers and UiPath customers, and I've asked them, "Well you know, "how do you differentiate between the two?" And they've said to me, "Look, our users and personal productivity users, "they like Power Automate, "they can use it themselves, and you know, "it doesn't take a lot of, you know, support on our end." The flip side is you could do that with UiPath, but like you said, there's more of a focus now on end-to-end enterprise automation and building out those capabilities. So it's increasingly a value play, and that's going to be obviously the challenge going forward. Okay, my last one, and then I think you've got some bonus ones. Number 10, hybrid events are the new category. Look it, if I can get a thousand inbounds that are largely self-serving, I can do my own here, 'cause we're in the events business. (Eric chuckling) Here's the prediction though, and this is a trend we're seeing, the number of physical events is going to dramatically increase. That might surprise people, but most of the big giant events are going to get smaller. The exception is AWS with Reinvent, I think Snowflake's going to continue to grow. So there are examples of physical events that are growing, but generally, most of the big ones are getting smaller, and there's going to be many more smaller intimate regional events and road shows. These micro-events, they're going to be stitched together. Digital is becoming a first class citizen, so people really got to get their digital acts together, and brands are prioritizing earned media, and they're beginning to build their own news networks, going direct to their customers. And so that's a trend we see, and I, you know, we're right in the middle of it, Eric, so you know we're going to, you mentioned RSA, I think that's perhaps going to be one of those crazy ones that continues to grow. It's shrunk, and then it, you know, 'cause last year- >> Yeah, it did shrink. >> right, it was the last one before the pandemic, and then they sort of made another run at it last year. It was smaller but it was very vibrant, and I think this year's going to be huge. Global World Congress is another one, we're going to be there end of Feb. That's obviously a big big show, but in general, the brands and the technology vendors, even Oracle is going to scale down. I don't know about Salesforce. We'll see. You had a couple of bonus predictions. Quantum and maybe some others? Bring us home. >> Yeah, sure. I got a few more. I think we touched upon one, but I definitely think the data prep tools are facing extinction, unfortunately, you know, the Talons Informatica is some of those names. The problem there is that the BI tools are kind of including data prep into it already. You know, an example of that is Tableau Prep Builder, and then in addition, Advanced NLP is being worked in as well. ThoughtSpot, Intelius, both often say that as their selling point, Tableau has Ask Data, Click has Insight Bot, so you don't have to really be intelligent on data prep anymore. A regular business user can just self-query, using either the search bar, or even just speaking into what it needs, and these tools are kind of doing the data prep for it. I don't think that's a, you know, an out in left field type of prediction, but it's the time is nigh. The other one I would also state is that I think knowledge graphs are going to break through this year. Neo4j in our survey is growing in pervasion in Mindshare. So more and more people are citing it, AWS Neptune's getting its act together, and we're seeing that spending intentions are growing there. Tiger Graph is also growing in our survey sample. I just think that the time is now for knowledge graphs to break through, and if I had to do one more, I'd say real-time streaming analytics moves from the very, very rich big enterprises to downstream, to more people are actually going to be moving towards real-time streaming, again, because the data prep tools and the data pipelines have gotten easier to use, and I think the ROI on real-time streaming is obviously there. So those are three that didn't make the cut, but I thought deserved an honorable mention. >> Yeah, I'm glad you did. Several weeks ago, we did an analyst prediction roundtable, if you will, a cube session power panel with a number of data analysts and that, you know, streaming, real-time streaming was top of mind. So glad you brought that up. Eric, as always, thank you very much. I appreciate the time you put in beforehand. I know it's been crazy, because you guys are wrapping up, you know, the last quarter survey in- >> Been a nuts three weeks for us. (laughing) >> job. I love the fact that you're doing, you know, the ETS survey now, I think it's quarterly now, right? Is that right? >> Yep. >> Yep. So that's phenomenal. >> Four times a year. I'll be happy to jump on with you when we get that done. I know you were really impressed with that last time. >> It's unbelievable. This is so much data at ETR. Okay. Hey, that's a wrap. Thanks again. >> Take care Dave. Good seeing you. >> All right, many thanks to our team here, Alex Myerson as production, he manages the podcast force. Ken Schiffman as well is a critical component of our East Coast studio. Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight help get the word out on social media and in our newsletters. And Rob Hoof is our editor-in-chief. He's at siliconangle.com. He's just a great editing for us. Thank you all. Remember all these episodes that are available as podcasts, wherever you listen, podcast is doing great. Just search "Breaking analysis podcast." Really appreciate you guys listening. I publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com, or you can email me directly if you want to get in touch, david.vellante@siliconangle.com. That's how I got all these. I really appreciate it. I went through every single one with a yellow highlighter. It took some time, (laughing) but I appreciate it. You could DM me at dvellante, or comment on our LinkedIn post and please check out etr.ai. Its data is amazing. Best survey data in the enterprise tech business. This is Dave Vellante for theCube Insights, powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, and we'll see you next time on "Breaking Analysis." (upbeat music beginning) (upbeat music ending)
SUMMARY :
insights from the Cube and ETR, do for the community, Dave, good to see you. actually come back to me if you would. It just stays at the top. the most aggressive to cut. that have the most to lose What's the primary method still leads the way, you know, So in addition to what we're seeing here, And so I actually thank you I went through it for you. I'm going to ask you to explain and they're certainly not going to get it to you in a zero trust way. So all of that is the One is just the number of So come back to me in 12 So 52% of the ETR survey amount of money on the Metaverse and also in the data prep tools. the cloud expands to the biggest shock to me "Ah, it's, you know, really and Fastly is their really the folks said, you know, for a home in the enterprise, Yeah, and I got to be honest, in the community, you know, and I don't know if that's the right move and the vertical axis is shared net score. So that's really what you want Well, the way they compete So that's, you know, One of the problems, if and that's going to be obviously even Oracle is going to scale down. and the data pipelines and that, you know, Been a nuts three I love the fact I know you were really is so much data at ETR. and we'll see you next time
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rob Hoof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ravi Mayuram | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George Gilbert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tristan Handy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Atif Kahn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
November | DATE | 0.99+ |
Frank Slootman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
APAC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David Foyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
February | DATE | 0.99+ |
January 2023 | DATE | 0.99+ |
DBT Labs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rob Ensslin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Scott Stevenson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
69% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
4.6% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Scott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1,181 responses | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Alex | PERSON | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
OneTrust | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
45% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
33% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two reasons | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
BeyondTrust | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
7% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: ChatGPT Won't Give OpenAI First Mover Advantage
>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> OpenAI The company, and ChatGPT have taken the world by storm. Microsoft reportedly is investing an additional 10 billion dollars into the company. But in our view, while the hype around ChatGPT is justified, we don't believe OpenAI will lock up the market with its first mover advantage. Rather, we believe that success in this market will be directly proportional to the quality and quantity of data that a technology company has at its disposal, and the compute power that it could deploy to run its system. Hello and welcome to this week's Wikibon CUBE insights, powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we unpack the excitement around ChatGPT, and debate the premise that the company's early entry into the space may not confer winner take all advantage to OpenAI. And to do so, we welcome CUBE collaborator, alum, Sarbjeet Johal, (chuckles) and John Furrier, co-host of the Cube. Great to see you Sarbjeet, John. Really appreciate you guys coming to the program. >> Great to be on. >> Okay, so what is ChatGPT? Well, actually we asked ChatGPT, what is ChatGPT? So here's what it said. ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model developed by OpenAI that can generate human-like text. It could be fine tuned for a variety of language tasks, such as conversation, summarization, and language translation. So I asked it, give it to me in 50 words or less. How did it do? Anything to add? >> Yeah, think it did good. It's large language model, like previous models, but it started applying the transformers sort of mechanism to focus on what prompt you have given it to itself. And then also the what answer it gave you in the first, sort of, one sentence or two sentences, and then introspect on itself, like what I have already said to you. And so just work on that. So it it's self sort of focus if you will. It does, the transformers help the large language models to do that. >> So to your point, it's a large language model, and GPT stands for generative pre-trained transformer. >> And if you put the definition back up there again, if you put it back up on the screen, let's see it back up. Okay, it actually missed the large, word large. So one of the problems with ChatGPT, it's not always accurate. It's actually a large language model, and it says state of the art language model. And if you look at Google, Google has dominated AI for many times and they're well known as being the best at this. And apparently Google has their own large language model, LLM, in play and have been holding it back to release because of backlash on the accuracy. Like just in that example you showed is a great point. They got almost right, but they missed the key word. >> You know what's funny about that John, is I had previously asked it in my prompt to give me it in less than a hundred words, and it was too long, I said I was too long for Breaking Analysis, and there it went into the fact that it's a large language model. So it largely, it gave me a really different answer the, for both times. So, but it's still pretty amazing for those of you who haven't played with it yet. And one of the best examples that I saw was Ben Charrington from This Week In ML AI podcast. And I stumbled on this thanks to Brian Gracely, who was listening to one of his Cloudcasts. Basically what Ben did is he took, he prompted ChatGPT to interview ChatGPT, and he simply gave the system the prompts, and then he ran the questions and answers into this avatar builder and sped it up 2X so it didn't sound like a machine. And voila, it was amazing. So John is ChatGPT going to take over as a cube host? >> Well, I was thinking, we get the questions in advance sometimes from PR people. We should actually just plug it in ChatGPT, add it to our notes, and saying, "Is this good enough for you? Let's ask the real question." So I think, you know, I think there's a lot of heavy lifting that gets done. I think the ChatGPT is a phenomenal revolution. I think it highlights the use case. Like that example we showed earlier. It gets most of it right. So it's directionally correct and it feels like it's an answer, but it's not a hundred percent accurate. And I think that's where people are seeing value in it. Writing marketing, copy, brainstorming, guest list, gift list for somebody. Write me some lyrics to a song. Give me a thesis about healthcare policy in the United States. It'll do a bang up job, and then you got to go in and you can massage it. So we're going to do three quarters of the work. That's why plagiarism and schools are kind of freaking out. And that's why Microsoft put 10 billion in, because why wouldn't this be a feature of Word, or the OS to help it do stuff on behalf of the user. So linguistically it's a beautiful thing. You can input a string and get a good answer. It's not a search result. >> And we're going to get your take on on Microsoft and, but it kind of levels the playing- but ChatGPT writes better than I do, Sarbjeet, and I know you have some good examples too. You mentioned the Reed Hastings example. >> Yeah, I was listening to Reed Hastings fireside chat with ChatGPT, and the answers were coming as sort of voice, in the voice format. And it was amazing what, he was having very sort of philosophy kind of talk with the ChatGPT, the longer sentences, like he was going on, like, just like we are talking, he was talking for like almost two minutes and then ChatGPT was answering. It was not one sentence question, and then a lot of answers from ChatGPT and yeah, you're right. I, this is our ability. I've been thinking deep about this since yesterday, we talked about, like, we want to do this segment. The data is fed into the data model. It can be the current data as well, but I think that, like, models like ChatGPT, other companies will have those too. They can, they're democratizing the intelligence, but they're not creating intelligence yet, definitely yet I can say that. They will give you all the finite answers. Like, okay, how do you do this for loop in Java, versus, you know, C sharp, and as a programmer you can do that, in, but they can't tell you that, how to write a new algorithm or write a new search algorithm for you. They cannot create a secretive code for you to- >> Not yet. >> Have competitive advantage. >> Not yet, not yet. >> but you- >> Can Google do that today? >> No one really can. The reasoning side of the data is, we talked about at our Supercloud event, with Zhamak Dehghani who's was CEO of, now of Nextdata. This next wave of data intelligence is going to come from entrepreneurs that are probably cross discipline, computer science and some other discipline. But they're going to be new things, for example, data, metadata, and data. It's hard to do reasoning like a human being, so that needs more data to train itself. So I think the first gen of this training module for the large language model they have is a corpus of text. Lot of that's why blog posts are, but the facts are wrong and sometimes out of context, because that contextual reasoning takes time, it takes intelligence. So machines need to become intelligent, and so therefore they need to be trained. So you're going to start to see, I think, a lot of acceleration on training the data sets. And again, it's only as good as the data you can get. And again, proprietary data sets will be a huge winner. Anyone who's got a large corpus of content, proprietary content like theCUBE or SiliconANGLE as a publisher will benefit from this. Large FinTech companies, anyone with large proprietary data will probably be a big winner on this generative AI wave, because it just, it will eat that up, and turn that back into something better. So I think there's going to be a lot of interesting things to look at here. And certainly productivity's going to be off the charts for vanilla and the internet is going to get swarmed with vanilla content. So if you're in the content business, and you're an original content producer of any kind, you're going to be not vanilla, so you're going to be better. So I think there's so much at play Dave (indistinct). >> I think the playing field has been risen, so we- >> Risen and leveled? >> Yeah, and leveled to certain extent. So it's now like that few people as consumers, as consumers of AI, we will have a advantage and others cannot have that advantage. So it will be democratized. That's, I'm sure about that. But if you take the example of calculator, when the calculator came in, and a lot of people are, "Oh, people can't do math anymore because calculator is there." right? So it's a similar sort of moment, just like a calculator for the next level. But, again- >> I see it more like open source, Sarbjeet, because like if you think about what ChatGPT's doing, you do a query and it comes from somewhere the value of a post from ChatGPT is just a reuse of AI. The original content accent will be come from a human. So if I lay out a paragraph from ChatGPT, did some heavy lifting on some facts, I check the facts, save me about maybe- >> Yeah, it's productive. >> An hour writing, and then I write a killer two, three sentences of, like, sharp original thinking or critical analysis. I then took that body of work, open source content, and then laid something on top of it. >> And Sarbjeet's example is a good one, because like if the calculator kids don't do math as well anymore, the slide rule, remember we had slide rules as kids, remember we first started using Waze, you know, we were this minority and you had an advantage over other drivers. Now Waze is like, you know, social traffic, you know, navigation, everybody had, you know- >> All the back roads are crowded. >> They're car crowded. (group laughs) Exactly. All right, let's, let's move on. What about this notion that futurist Ray Amara put forth and really Amara's Law that we're showing here, it's, the law is we, you know, "We tend to overestimate the effect of technology in the short run and underestimate it in the long run." Is that the case, do you think, with ChatGPT? What do you think Sarbjeet? >> I think that's true actually. There's a lot of, >> We don't debate this. >> There's a lot of awe, like when people see the results from ChatGPT, they say what, what the heck? Like, it can do this? But then if you use it more and more and more, and I ask the set of similar question, not the same question, and it gives you like same answer. It's like reading from the same bucket of text in, the interior read (indistinct) where the ChatGPT, you will see that in some couple of segments. It's very, it sounds so boring that the ChatGPT is coming out the same two sentences every time. So it is kind of good, but it's not as good as people think it is right now. But we will have, go through this, you know, hype sort of cycle and get realistic with it. And then in the long term, I think it's a great thing in the short term, it's not something which will (indistinct) >> What's your counter point? You're saying it's not. >> I, no I think the question was, it's hyped up in the short term and not it's underestimated long term. That's what I think what he said, quote. >> Yes, yeah. That's what he said. >> Okay, I think that's wrong with this, because this is a unique, ChatGPT is a unique kind of impact and it's very generational. People have been comparing it, I have been comparing to the internet, like the web, web browser Mosaic and Netscape, right, Navigator. I mean, I clearly still remember the days seeing Navigator for the first time, wow. And there weren't not many sites you could go to, everyone typed in, you know, cars.com, you know. >> That (indistinct) wasn't that overestimated, the overhyped at the beginning and underestimated. >> No, it was, it was underestimated long run, people thought. >> But that Amara's law. >> That's what is. >> No, they said overestimated? >> Overestimated near term underestimated- overhyped near term, underestimated long term. I got, right I mean? >> Well, I, yeah okay, so I would then agree, okay then- >> We were off the charts about the internet in the early days, and it actually exceeded our expectations. >> Well there were people who were, like, poo-pooing it early on. So when the browser came out, people were like, "Oh, the web's a toy for kids." I mean, in 1995 the web was a joke, right? So '96, you had online populations growing, so you had structural changes going on around the browser, internet population. And then that replaced other things, direct mail, other business activities that were once analog then went to the web, kind of read only as you, as we always talk about. So I think that's a moment where the hype long term, the smart money, and the smart industry experts all get the long term. And in this case, there's more poo-pooing in the short term. "Ah, it's not a big deal, it's just AI." I've heard many people poo-pooing ChatGPT, and a lot of smart people saying, "No this is next gen, this is different and it's only going to get better." So I think people are estimating a big long game on this one. >> So you're saying it's bifurcated. There's those who say- >> Yes. >> Okay, all right, let's get to the heart of the premise, and possibly the debate for today's episode. Will OpenAI's early entry into the market confer sustainable competitive advantage for the company. And if you look at the history of tech, the technology industry, it's kind of littered with first mover failures. Altair, IBM, Tandy, Commodore, they and Apple even, they were really early in the PC game. They took a backseat to Dell who came in the scene years later with a better business model. Netscape, you were just talking about, was all the rage in Silicon Valley, with the first browser, drove up all the housing prices out here. AltaVista was the first search engine to really, you know, index full text. >> Owned by Dell, I mean DEC. >> Owned by Digital. >> Yeah, Digital Equipment >> Compaq bought it. And of course as an aside, Digital, they wanted to showcase their hardware, right? Their super computer stuff. And then so Friendster and MySpace, they came before Facebook. The iPhone certainly wasn't the first mobile device. So lots of failed examples, but there are some recent successes like AWS and cloud. >> You could say smartphone. So I mean. >> Well I know, and you can, we can parse this so we'll debate it. Now Twitter, you could argue, had first mover advantage. You kind of gave me that one John. Bitcoin and crypto clearly had first mover advantage, and sustaining that. Guys, will OpenAI make it to the list on the right with ChatGPT, what do you think? >> I think categorically as a company, it probably won't, but as a category, I think what they're doing will, so OpenAI as a company, they get funding, there's power dynamics involved. Microsoft put a billion dollars in early on, then they just pony it up. Now they're reporting 10 billion more. So, like, if the browsers, Microsoft had competitive advantage over Netscape, and used monopoly power, and convicted by the Department of Justice for killing Netscape with their monopoly, Netscape should have had won that battle, but Microsoft killed it. In this case, Microsoft's not killing it, they're buying into it. So I think the embrace extend Microsoft power here makes OpenAI vulnerable for that one vendor solution. So the AI as a company might not make the list, but the category of what this is, large language model AI, is probably will be on the right hand side. >> Okay, we're going to come back to the government intervention and maybe do some comparisons, but what are your thoughts on this premise here? That, it will basically set- put forth the premise that it, that ChatGPT, its early entry into the market will not confer competitive advantage to >> For OpenAI. >> To Open- Yeah, do you agree with that? >> I agree with that actually. It, because Google has been at it, and they have been holding back, as John said because of the scrutiny from the Fed, right, so- >> And privacy too. >> And the privacy and the accuracy as well. But I think Sam Altman and the company on those guys, right? They have put this in a hasty way out there, you know, because it makes mistakes, and there are a lot of questions around the, sort of, where the content is coming from. You saw that as your example, it just stole the content, and without your permission, you know? >> Yeah. So as quick this aside- >> And it codes on people's behalf and the, those codes are wrong. So there's a lot of, sort of, false information it's putting out there. So it's a very vulnerable thing to do what Sam Altman- >> So even though it'll get better, others will compete. >> So look, just side note, a term which Reid Hoffman used a little bit. Like he said, it's experimental launch, like, you know, it's- >> It's pretty damn good. >> It is clever because according to Sam- >> It's more than clever. It's good. >> It's awesome, if you haven't used it. I mean you write- you read what it writes and you go, "This thing writes so well, it writes so much better than you." >> The human emotion drives that too. I think that's a big thing. But- >> I Want to add one more- >> Make your last point. >> Last one. Okay. So, but he's still holding back. He's conducting quite a few interviews. If you want to get the gist of it, there's an interview with StrictlyVC interview from yesterday with Sam Altman. Listen to that one it's an eye opening what they want- where they want to take it. But my last one I want to make it on this point is that Satya Nadella yesterday did an interview with Wall Street Journal. I think he was doing- >> You were not impressed. >> I was not impressed because he was pushing it too much. So Sam Altman's holding back so there's less backlash. >> Got 10 billion reasons to push. >> I think he's almost- >> Microsoft just laid off 10000 people. Hey ChatGPT, find me a job. You know like. (group laughs) >> He's overselling it to an extent that I think it will backfire on Microsoft. And he's over promising a lot of stuff right now, I think. I don't know why he's very jittery about all these things. And he did the same thing during Ignite as well. So he said, "Oh, this AI will write code for you and this and that." Like you called him out- >> The hyperbole- >> During your- >> from Satya Nadella, he's got a lot of hyperbole. (group talks over each other) >> All right, Let's, go ahead. >> Well, can I weigh in on the whole- >> Yeah, sure. >> Microsoft thing on whether OpenAI, here's the take on this. I think it's more like the browser moment to me, because I could relate to that experience with ChatG, personally, emotionally, when I saw that, and I remember vividly- >> You mean that aha moment (indistinct). >> Like this is obviously the future. Anything else in the old world is dead, website's going to be everywhere. It was just instant dot connection for me. And a lot of other smart people who saw this. Lot of people by the way, didn't see it. Someone said the web's a toy. At the company I was worked for at the time, Hewlett Packard, they like, they could have been in, they had invented HTML, and so like all this stuff was, like, they just passed, the web was just being passed over. But at that time, the browser got better, more websites came on board. So the structural advantage there was online web usage was growing, online user population. So that was growing exponentially with the rise of the Netscape browser. So OpenAI could stay on the right side of your list as durable, if they leverage the category that they're creating, can get the scale. And if they can get the scale, just like Twitter, that failed so many times that they still hung around. So it was a product that was always successful, right? So I mean, it should have- >> You're right, it was terrible, we kept coming back. >> The fail whale, but it still grew. So OpenAI has that moment. They could do it if Microsoft doesn't meddle too much with too much power as a vendor. They could be the Netscape Navigator, without the anti-competitive behavior of somebody else. So to me, they have the pole position. So they have an opportunity. So if not, if they don't execute, then there's opportunity. There's not a lot of barriers to entry, vis-a-vis say the CapEx of say a cloud company like AWS. You can't replicate that, Many have tried, but I think you can replicate OpenAI. >> And we're going to talk about that. Okay, so real quick, I want to bring in some ETR data. This isn't an ETR heavy segment, only because this so new, you know, they haven't coverage yet, but they do cover AI. So basically what we're seeing here is a slide on the vertical axis's net score, which is a measure of spending momentum, and in the horizontal axis's is presence in the dataset. Think of it as, like, market presence. And in the insert right there, you can see how the dots are plotted, the two columns. And so, but the key point here that we want to make, there's a bunch of companies on the left, is he like, you know, DataRobot and C3 AI and some others, but the big whales, Google, AWS, Microsoft, are really dominant in this market. So that's really the key takeaway that, can we- >> I notice IBM is way low. >> Yeah, IBM's low, and actually bring that back up and you, but then you see Oracle who actually is injecting. So I guess that's the other point is, you're not necessarily going to go buy AI, and you know, build your own AI, you're going to, it's going to be there and, it, Salesforce is going to embed it into its platform, the SaaS companies, and you're going to purchase AI. You're not necessarily going to build it. But some companies obviously are. >> I mean to quote IBM's general manager Rob Thomas, "You can't have AI with IA." information architecture and David Flynn- >> You can't Have AI without IA >> without, you can't have AI without IA. You can't have, if you have an Information Architecture, you then can power AI. Yesterday David Flynn, with Hammersmith, was on our Supercloud. He was pointing out that the relationship of storage, where you store things, also impacts the data and stressablity, and Zhamak from Nextdata, she was pointing out that same thing. So the data problem factors into all this too, Dave. >> So you got the big cloud and internet giants, they're all poised to go after this opportunity. Microsoft is investing up to 10 billion. Google's code red, which was, you know, the headline in the New York Times. Of course Apple is there and several alternatives in the market today. Guys like Chinchilla, Bloom, and there's a company Jasper and several others, and then Lena Khan looms large and the government's around the world, EU, US, China, all taking notice before the market really is coalesced around a single player. You know, John, you mentioned Netscape, they kind of really, the US government was way late to that game. It was kind of game over. And Netscape, I remember Barksdale was like, "Eh, we're going to be selling software in the enterprise anyway." and then, pshew, the company just dissipated. So, but it looks like the US government, especially with Lena Khan, they're changing the definition of antitrust and what the cause is to go after people, and they're really much more aggressive. It's only what, two years ago that (indistinct). >> Yeah, the problem I have with the federal oversight is this, they're always like late to the game, and they're slow to catch up. So in other words, they're working on stuff that should have been solved a year and a half, two years ago around some of the social networks hiding behind some of the rules around open web back in the days, and I think- >> But they're like 15 years late to that. >> Yeah, and now they got this new thing on top of it. So like, I just worry about them getting their fingers. >> But there's only two years, you know, OpenAI. >> No, but the thing (indistinct). >> No, they're still fighting other battles. But the problem with government is that they're going to label Big Tech as like a evil thing like Pharma, it's like smoke- >> You know Lena Khan wants to kill Big Tech, there's no question. >> So I think Big Tech is getting a very seriously bad rap. And I think anything that the government does that shades darkness on tech, is politically motivated in most cases. You can almost look at everything, and my 80 20 rule is in play here. 80% of the government activity around tech is bullshit, it's politically motivated, and the 20% is probably relevant, but off the mark and not organized. >> Well market forces have always been the determining factor of success. The governments, you know, have been pretty much failed. I mean you look at IBM's antitrust, that, what did that do? The market ultimately beat them. You look at Microsoft back in the day, right? Windows 95 was peaking, the government came in. But you know, like you said, they missed the web, right, and >> so they were hanging on- >> There's nobody in government >> to Windows. >> that actually knows- >> And so, you, I think you're right. It's market forces that are going to determine this. But Sarbjeet, what do you make of Microsoft's big bet here, you weren't impressed with with Nadella. How do you think, where are they going to apply it? Is this going to be a Hail Mary for Bing, or is it going to be applied elsewhere? What do you think. >> They are saying that they will, sort of, weave this into their products, office products, productivity and also to write code as well, developer productivity as well. That's a big play for them. But coming back to your antitrust sort of comments, right? I believe the, your comment was like, oh, fed was late 10 years or 15 years earlier, but now they're two years. But things are moving very fast now as compared to they used to move. >> So two years is like 10 Years. >> Yeah, two years is like 10 years. Just want to make that point. (Dave laughs) This thing is going like wildfire. Any new tech which comes in that I think they're going against distribution channels. Lina Khan has commented time and again that the marketplace model is that she wants to have some grip on. Cloud marketplaces are a kind of monopolistic kind of way. >> I don't, I don't see this, I don't see a Chat AI. >> You told me it's not Bing, you had an interesting comment. >> No, no. First of all, this is great from Microsoft. If you're Microsoft- >> Why? >> Because Microsoft doesn't have the AI chops that Google has, right? Google is got so much core competency on how they run their search, how they run their backends, their cloud, even though they don't get a lot of cloud market share in the enterprise, they got a kick ass cloud cause they needed one. >> Totally. >> They've invented SRE. I mean Google's development and engineering chops are off the scales, right? Amazon's got some good chops, but Google's got like 10 times more chops than AWS in my opinion. Cloud's a whole different story. Microsoft gets AI, they get a playbook, they get a product they can render into, the not only Bing, productivity software, helping people write papers, PowerPoint, also don't forget the cloud AI can super help. We had this conversation on our Supercloud event, where AI's going to do a lot of the heavy lifting around understanding observability and managing service meshes, to managing microservices, to turning on and off applications, and or maybe writing code in real time. So there's a plethora of use cases for Microsoft to deploy this. combined with their R and D budgets, they can then turbocharge more research, build on it. So I think this gives them a car in the game, Google may have pole position with AI, but this puts Microsoft right in the game, and they already have a lot of stuff going on. But this just, I mean everything gets lifted up. Security, cloud, productivity suite, everything. >> What's under the hood at Google, and why aren't they talking about it? I mean they got to be freaked out about this. No? Or do they have kind of a magic bullet? >> I think they have the, they have the chops definitely. Magic bullet, I don't know where they are, as compared to the ChatGPT 3 or 4 models. Like they, but if you look at the online sort of activity and the videos put out there from Google folks, Google technology folks, that's account you should look at if you are looking there, they have put all these distinctions what ChatGPT 3 has used, they have been talking about for a while as well. So it's not like it's a secret thing that you cannot replicate. As you said earlier, like in the beginning of this segment, that anybody who has more data and the capacity to process that data, which Google has both, I think they will win this. >> Obviously living in Palo Alto where the Google founders are, and Google's headquarters next town over we have- >> We're so close to them. We have inside information on some of the thinking and that hasn't been reported by any outlet yet. And that is, is that, from what I'm hearing from my sources, is Google has it, they don't want to release it for many reasons. One is it might screw up their search monopoly, one, two, they're worried about the accuracy, 'cause Google will get sued. 'Cause a lot of people are jamming on this ChatGPT as, "Oh it does everything for me." when it's clearly not a hundred percent accurate all the time. >> So Lina Kahn is looming, and so Google's like be careful. >> Yeah so Google's just like, this is the third, could be a third rail. >> But the first thing you said is a concern. >> Well no. >> The disruptive (indistinct) >> What they will do is do a Waymo kind of thing, where they spin out a separate company. >> They're doing that. >> The discussions happening, they're going to spin out the separate company and put it over there, and saying, "This is AI, got search over there, don't touch that search, 'cause that's where all the revenue is." (chuckles) >> So, okay, so that's how they deal with the Clay Christensen dilemma. What's the business model here? I mean it's not advertising, right? Is it to charge you for a query? What, how do you make money at this? >> It's a good question, I mean my thinking is, first of all, it's cool to type stuff in and see a paper get written, or write a blog post, or gimme a marketing slogan for this or that or write some code. I think the API side of the business will be critical. And I think Howie Xu, I know you're going to reference some of his comments yesterday on Supercloud, I think this brings a whole 'nother user interface into technology consumption. I think the business model, not yet clear, but it will probably be some sort of either API and developer environment or just a straight up free consumer product, with some sort of freemium backend thing for business. >> And he was saying too, it's natural language is the way in which you're going to interact with these systems. >> I think it's APIs, it's APIs, APIs, APIs, because these people who are cooking up these models, and it takes a lot of compute power to train these and to, for inference as well. Somebody did the analysis on the how many cents a Google search costs to Google, and how many cents the ChatGPT query costs. It's, you know, 100x or something on that. You can take a look at that. >> A 100x on which side? >> You're saying two orders of magnitude more expensive for ChatGPT >> Much more, yeah. >> Than for Google. >> It's very expensive. >> So Google's got the data, they got the infrastructure and they got, you're saying they got the cost (indistinct) >> No actually it's a simple query as well, but they are trying to put together the answers, and they're going through a lot more data versus index data already, you know. >> Let me clarify, you're saying that Google's version of ChatGPT is more efficient? >> No, I'm, I'm saying Google search results. >> Ah, search results. >> What are used to today, but cheaper. >> But that, does that, is that going to confer advantage to Google's large language (indistinct)? >> It will, because there were deep science (indistinct). >> Google, I don't think Google search is doing a large language model on their search, it's keyword search. You know, what's the weather in Santa Cruz? Or how, what's the weather going to be? Or you know, how do I find this? Now they have done a smart job of doing some things with those queries, auto complete, re direct navigation. But it's, it's not entity. It's not like, "Hey, what's Dave Vellante thinking this week in Breaking Analysis?" ChatGPT might get that, because it'll get your Breaking Analysis, it'll synthesize it. There'll be some, maybe some clips. It'll be like, you know, I mean. >> Well I got to tell you, I asked ChatGPT to, like, I said, I'm going to enter a transcript of a discussion I had with Nir Zuk, the CTO of Palo Alto Networks, And I want you to write a 750 word blog. I never input the transcript. It wrote a 750 word blog. It attributed quotes to him, and it just pulled a bunch of stuff that, and said, okay, here it is. It talked about Supercloud, it defined Supercloud. >> It's made, it makes you- >> Wow, But it was a big lie. It was fraudulent, but still, blew me away. >> Again, vanilla content and non accurate content. So we are going to see a surge of misinformation on steroids, but I call it the vanilla content. Wow, that's just so boring, (indistinct). >> There's so many dangers. >> Make your point, cause we got to, almost out of time. >> Okay, so the consumption, like how do you consume this thing. As humans, we are consuming it and we are, like, getting a nicely, like, surprisingly shocked, you know, wow, that's cool. It's going to increase productivity and all that stuff, right? And on the danger side as well, the bad actors can take hold of it and create fake content and we have the fake sort of intelligence, if you go out there. So that's one thing. The second thing is, we are as humans are consuming this as language. Like we read that, we listen to it, whatever format we consume that is, but the ultimate usage of that will be when the machines can take that output from likes of ChatGPT, and do actions based on that. The robots can work, the robot can paint your house, we were talking about, right? Right now we can't do that. >> Data apps. >> So the data has to be ingested by the machines. It has to be digestible by the machines. And the machines cannot digest unorganized data right now, we will get better on the ingestion side as well. So we are getting better. >> Data, reasoning, insights, and action. >> I like that mall, paint my house. >> So, okay- >> By the way, that means drones that'll come in. Spray painting your house. >> Hey, it wasn't too long ago that robots couldn't climb stairs, as I like to point out. Okay, and of course it's no surprise the venture capitalists are lining up to eat at the trough, as I'd like to say. Let's hear, you'd referenced this earlier, John, let's hear what AI expert Howie Xu said at the Supercloud event, about what it takes to clone ChatGPT. Please, play the clip. >> So one of the VCs actually asked me the other day, right? "Hey, how much money do I need to spend, invest to get a, you know, another shot to the openAI sort of the level." You know, I did a (indistinct) >> Line up. >> A hundred million dollar is the order of magnitude that I came up with, right? You know, not a billion, not 10 million, right? So a hundred- >> Guys a hundred million dollars, that's an astoundingly low figure. What do you make of it? >> I was in an interview with, I was interviewing, I think he said hundred million or so, but in the hundreds of millions, not a billion right? >> You were trying to get him up, you were like "Hundreds of millions." >> Well I think, I- >> He's like, eh, not 10, not a billion. >> Well first of all, Howie Xu's an expert machine learning. He's at Zscaler, he's a machine learning AI guy. But he comes from VMware, he's got his technology pedigrees really off the chart. Great friend of theCUBE and kind of like a CUBE analyst for us. And he's smart. He's right. I think the barriers to entry from a dollar standpoint are lower than say the CapEx required to compete with AWS. Clearly, the CapEx spending to build all the tech for the run a cloud. >> And you don't need a huge sales force. >> And in some case apps too, it's the same thing. But I think it's not that hard. >> But am I right about that? You don't need a huge sales force either. It's, what, you know >> If the product's good, it will sell, this is a new era. The better mouse trap will win. This is the new economics in software, right? So- >> Because you look at the amount of money Lacework, and Snyk, Snowflake, Databrooks. Look at the amount of money they've raised. I mean it's like a billion dollars before they get to IPO or more. 'Cause they need promotion, they need go to market. You don't need (indistinct) >> OpenAI's been working on this for multiple five years plus it's, hasn't, wasn't born yesterday. Took a lot of years to get going. And Sam is depositioning all the success, because he's trying to manage expectations, To your point Sarbjeet, earlier. It's like, yeah, he's trying to "Whoa, whoa, settle down everybody, (Dave laughs) it's not that great." because he doesn't want to fall into that, you know, hero and then get taken down, so. >> It may take a 100 million or 150 or 200 million to train the model. But to, for the inference to, yeah to for the inference machine, It will take a lot more, I believe. >> Give it, so imagine, >> Because- >> Go ahead, sorry. >> Go ahead. But because it consumes a lot more compute cycles and it's certain level of storage and everything, right, which they already have. So I think to compute is different. To frame the model is a different cost. But to run the business is different, because I think 100 million can go into just fighting the Fed. >> Well there's a flywheel too. >> Oh that's (indistinct) >> (indistinct) >> We are running the business, right? >> It's an interesting number, but it's also kind of, like, context to it. So here, a hundred million spend it, you get there, but you got to factor in the fact that the ways companies win these days is critical mass scale, hitting a flywheel. If they can keep that flywheel of the value that they got going on and get better, you can almost imagine a marketplace where, hey, we have proprietary data, we're SiliconANGLE in theCUBE. We have proprietary content, CUBE videos, transcripts. Well wouldn't it be great if someone in a marketplace could sell a module for us, right? We buy that, Amazon's thing and things like that. So if they can get a marketplace going where you can apply to data sets that may be proprietary, you can start to see this become bigger. And so I think the key barriers to entry is going to be success. I'll give you an example, Reddit. Reddit is successful and it's hard to copy, not because of the software. >> They built the moat. >> Because you can, buy Reddit open source software and try To compete. >> They built the moat with their community. >> Their community, their scale, their user expectation. Twitter, we referenced earlier, that thing should have gone under the first two years, but there was such a great emotional product. People would tolerate the fail whale. And then, you know, well that was a whole 'nother thing. >> Then a plane landed in (John laughs) the Hudson and it was over. >> I think verticals, a lot of verticals will build applications using these models like for lawyers, for doctors, for scientists, for content creators, for- >> So you'll have many hundreds of millions of dollars investments that are going to be seeping out. If, all right, we got to wrap, if you had to put odds on it that that OpenAI is going to be the leader, maybe not a winner take all leader, but like you look at like Amazon and cloud, they're not winner take all, these aren't necessarily winner take all markets. It's not necessarily a zero sum game, but let's call it winner take most. What odds would you give that open AI 10 years from now will be in that position. >> If I'm 0 to 10 kind of thing? >> Yeah, it's like horse race, 3 to 1, 2 to 1, even money, 10 to 1, 50 to 1. >> Maybe 2 to 1, >> 2 to 1, that's pretty low odds. That's basically saying they're the favorite, they're the front runner. Would you agree with that? >> I'd say 4 to 1. >> Yeah, I was going to say I'm like a 5 to 1, 7 to 1 type of person, 'cause I'm a skeptic with, you know, there's so much competition, but- >> I think they're definitely the leader. I mean you got to say, I mean. >> Oh there's no question. There's no question about it. >> The question is can they execute? >> They're not Friendster, is what you're saying. >> They're not Friendster and they're more like Twitter and Reddit where they have momentum. If they can execute on the product side, and if they don't stumble on that, they will continue to have the lead. >> If they say stay neutral, as Sam is, has been saying, that, hey, Microsoft is one of our partners, if you look at their company model, how they have structured the company, then they're going to pay back to the investors, like Microsoft is the biggest one, up to certain, like by certain number of years, they're going to pay back from all the money they make, and after that, they're going to give the money back to the public, to the, I don't know who they give it to, like non-profit or something. (indistinct) >> Okay, the odds are dropping. (group talks over each other) That's a good point though >> Actually they might have done that to fend off the criticism of this. But it's really interesting to see the model they have adopted. >> The wildcard in all this, My last word on this is that, if there's a developer shift in how developers and data can come together again, we have conferences around the future of data, Supercloud and meshs versus, you know, how the data world, coding with data, how that evolves will also dictate, 'cause a wild card could be a shift in the landscape around how developers are using either machine learning or AI like techniques to code into their apps, so. >> That's fantastic insight. I can't thank you enough for your time, on the heels of Supercloud 2, really appreciate it. All right, thanks to John and Sarbjeet for the outstanding conversation today. Special thanks to the Palo Alto studio team. My goodness, Anderson, this great backdrop. You guys got it all out here, I'm jealous. And Noah, really appreciate it, Chuck, Andrew Frick and Cameron, Andrew Frick switching, Cameron on the video lake, great job. And Alex Myerson, he's on production, manages the podcast for us, Ken Schiffman as well. Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight help get the word out on social media and our newsletters. Rob Hof is our editor-in-chief over at SiliconANGLE, does some great editing, thanks to all. Remember, all these episodes are available as podcasts. All you got to do is search Breaking Analysis podcast, wherever you listen. Publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com. Want to get in touch, email me directly, david.vellante@siliconangle.com or DM me at dvellante, or comment on our LinkedIn post. And by all means, check out etr.ai. They got really great survey data in the enterprise tech business. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, We'll see you next time on Breaking Analysis. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
bringing you data-driven and ChatGPT have taken the world by storm. So I asked it, give it to the large language models to do that. So to your point, it's So one of the problems with ChatGPT, and he simply gave the system the prompts, or the OS to help it do but it kind of levels the playing- and the answers were coming as the data you can get. Yeah, and leveled to certain extent. I check the facts, save me about maybe- and then I write a killer because like if the it's, the law is we, you know, I think that's true and I ask the set of similar question, What's your counter point? and not it's underestimated long term. That's what he said. for the first time, wow. the overhyped at the No, it was, it was I got, right I mean? the internet in the early days, and it's only going to get better." So you're saying it's bifurcated. and possibly the debate the first mobile device. So I mean. on the right with ChatGPT, and convicted by the Department of Justice the scrutiny from the Fed, right, so- And the privacy and thing to do what Sam Altman- So even though it'll get like, you know, it's- It's more than clever. I mean you write- I think that's a big thing. I think he was doing- I was not impressed because You know like. And he did the same thing he's got a lot of hyperbole. the browser moment to me, So OpenAI could stay on the right side You're right, it was terrible, They could be the Netscape Navigator, and in the horizontal axis's So I guess that's the other point is, I mean to quote IBM's So the data problem factors and the government's around the world, and they're slow to catch up. Yeah, and now they got years, you know, OpenAI. But the problem with government to kill Big Tech, and the 20% is probably relevant, back in the day, right? are they going to apply it? and also to write code as well, that the marketplace I don't, I don't see you had an interesting comment. No, no. First of all, the AI chops that Google has, right? are off the scales, right? I mean they got to be and the capacity to process that data, on some of the thinking So Lina Kahn is looming, and this is the third, could be a third rail. But the first thing What they will do out the separate company Is it to charge you for a query? it's cool to type stuff in natural language is the way and how many cents the and they're going through Google search results. It will, because there were It'll be like, you know, I mean. I never input the transcript. Wow, But it was a big lie. but I call it the vanilla content. Make your point, cause we And on the danger side as well, So the data By the way, that means at the Supercloud event, So one of the VCs actually What do you make of it? you were like "Hundreds of millions." not 10, not a billion. Clearly, the CapEx spending to build all But I think it's not that hard. It's, what, you know This is the new economics Look at the amount of And Sam is depositioning all the success, or 150 or 200 million to train the model. So I think to compute is different. not because of the software. Because you can, buy They built the moat And then, you know, well that the Hudson and it was over. that are going to be seeping out. Yeah, it's like horse race, 3 to 1, 2 to 1, that's pretty low odds. I mean you got to say, I mean. Oh there's no question. is what you're saying. and if they don't stumble on that, the money back to the public, to the, Okay, the odds are dropping. the model they have adopted. Supercloud and meshs versus, you know, on the heels of Supercloud
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sarbjeet | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brian Gracely | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lina Khan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lena Khan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sam Altman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rob Thomas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
David Flynn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Noah | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ray Amara | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
150 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rob Hof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chuck | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Howie Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Anderson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Santa Cruz | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1995 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Lina Kahn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zhamak Dehghani | PERSON | 0.99+ |
50 words | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hundreds of millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Compaq | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kristen Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two sentences | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
hundreds of millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Satya Nadella | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cameron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one sentence | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Clay Christensen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sarbjeet Johal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Netscape | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: CIOs in a holding pattern but ready to strike at monetization
>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> Recent conversations with IT decision makers show a stark contrast between exiting 2023 versus the mindset when we were leaving 2022. CIOs are generally funding new initiatives by pushing off or cutting lower priority items, while security efforts are still being funded. Those that enable business initiatives that generate revenue or taking priority over cleaning up legacy technical debt. The bottom line is, for the moment, at least, the mindset is not cut everything, rather, it's put a pause on cleaning up legacy hairballs and fund monetization. Hello, and welcome to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis, we tap recent discussions from two primary sources, year-end ETR roundtables with IT decision makers, and CUBE conversations with data, cloud, and IT architecture practitioners. The sources of data for this breaking analysis come from the following areas. Eric Bradley's recent ETR year end panel featured a financial services DevOps and SRE manager, a CSO in a large hospitality firm, a director of IT for a big tech company, the head of IT infrastructure for a financial firm, and a CTO for global travel enterprise, and for our upcoming Supercloud2 conference on January 17th, which you can register free by the way, at supercloud.world, we've had CUBE conversations with data and cloud practitioners, specifically, heads of data in retail and financial services, a cloud architect and a biotech firm, the director of cloud and data at a large media firm, and the director of engineering at a financial services company. Now we've curated commentary from these sources and now we share them with you today as anecdotal evidence supporting what we've been reporting on in the marketplace for these last couple of quarters. On this program, we've likened the economy to the slingshot effect when you're driving, when you're cruising along at full speed on the highway, and suddenly you see red brake lights up ahead, so, you tap your own brakes and then you speed up again, and traffic is moving along at full speed, so, you think nothing of it, and then, all of a sudden, the same thing happens. You slow down to a crawl and you start wondering, "What the heck is happening?" And you become a lot more cautious about the rate of acceleration when you start moving again. Well, that's the trend in IT spend right now. Back in June, we reported that despite the macro headwinds, CIOs were still expecting 6% to 7% spending growth for 2022. Now that was down from 8%, which we reported at the beginning of 2022. That was before Ukraine, and Fed tightening, but given those two factors, you know that that seemed pretty robust, but throughout the fall, we began reporting consistently declining expectations where CIOs are now saying Q4 will come in at around 3% growth relative to last year, and they're expecting, or should we say hoping that it pops back up in 2023 to 4% to 5%. The recent ETR panelists, when they heard this, are saying based on their businesses and discussions with their peers, they could see low single digit growth for 2023, so, 1%, 2%, 3%, so, this sort of slingshotting, or sometimes we call it a seesaw economy, has caught everyone off guard. Amazon is a good example of this, and there are others, but Amazon entered the pandemic with around 800,000 employees. It doubled that workforce during the pandemic. Now, right before Thanksgiving in 2022, Amazon announced that it was laying off 10,000 employees, and, Jassy, the CEO of Amazon, just last week announced that number is now going to grow to 18,000. Now look, this is a rounding error at Amazon from a headcount standpoint and their headcount remains far above 2019 levels. Its stock price, however, does not and it's back down to 2019 levels. The point is that visibility is very poor right now and it's reflected in that uncertainty. We've seen a lot of layoffs, obviously, the stock market's choppy, et cetera. Now importantly, not everything is on hold, and this downturn is different from previous tech pullbacks in that the speed at which new initiatives can be rolled out is much greater thanks to the cloud, and if you can show a fast return, you're going to get funding. Organizations are pausing on the cleanup of technical debt, unless it's driving fast business value. They're holding off on modernization projects. Those business enablement initiatives are still getting funded. CIOs are finding the money by consolidating redundant vendors, and they're stealing from other pockets of budget, so, it's not surprising that cybersecurity remains the number one technology priority in 2023. We've been reporting that for quite some time now. It's specifically cloud, cloud native security container and API security. That's where all the action is, because there's still holes to plug from that forced march to digital that occurred during COVID. Cloud migration, kind of showing here on number two on this chart, still a high priority, while optimizing cloud spend is definitely a strategy that organizations are taking to cut costs. It's behind consolidating redundant vendors by a long shot. There's very little evidence that cloud repatriation, i.e., moving workloads back on prem is a major cost cutting trend. The data just doesn't show it. What is a trend is getting more real time with analytics, so, companies can do faster and more accurate customer targeting, and they're really prioritizing that, obviously, in this down economy. Real time, we sometimes lose it, what's real time? Real time, we sometimes define as before you lose the customer. Now in the hiring front, customers tell us they're still having a hard time finding qualified site reliability engineers, SREs, Kubernetes expertise, and deep analytics pros. These job markets remain very tight. Let's stay with security for just a moment. We said many times that, prior to COVID, zero trust was this undefined buzzword, and the joke, of course, is, if you ask three people, "What is zero trust?" You're going to get three different answers, but the truth is that virtually every security company that was resisting taking a position on zero trust in an attempt to avoid... They didn't want to get caught up in the buzzword vortex, but they're now really being forced to go there by CISOs, so, there are some good quotes here on cyber that we want to share that came out of the recent conversations that we cited up front. The first one, "Zero trust is the highest ROI, because it enables business transformation." In other words, if I can have good security, I can move fast, it's not a blocker anymore. Second quote here, "ZTA," zero trust architecture, "Is more than securing the perimeter. It encompasses strong authentication and multiple identity layers. It requires taking a software approach to security instead of a hardware focus." The next one, "I'd love to have a security data lake that I could apply to asset management, vulnerability management, incident management, incident response, and all aspects for my security team. I see huge promise in that space," and the last one, I see NLP, natural language processing, as the foundation for email security, so, instead of searching for IP addresses, you can now read emails at light speed and identify phishing threats, so, look at, this is a small snapshot of the mindset around security, but I'll add, when you talk to the likes of CrowdStrike, and Zscaler, and Okta, and Palo Alto Networks, and many other security firms, they're listening to these narratives around zero trust. I'm confident they're working hard on skating to this puck, if you will. A good example is this idea of a security data lake and using analytics to improve security. We're hearing a lot about that. We're hearing architectures, there's acquisitions in that regard, and so, that's becoming real, and there are many other examples, because data is at the heart of digital business. This is the next area that we want to talk about. It's obvious that data, as a topic, gets a lot of mind share amongst practitioners, but getting data right is still really hard. It's a challenge for most organizations to get ROI and expected return out of data. Most companies still put data at the periphery of their businesses. It's not at the core. Data lives within silos or different business units, different clouds, it's on-prem, and increasingly it's at the edge, and it seems like the problem is getting worse before it gets better, so, here are some instructive comments from our recent conversations. The first one, "We're publishing events onto Kafka, having those events be processed by Dataproc." Dataproc is a Google managed service to run Hadoop, and Spark, and Flank, and Presto, and a bunch of other open source tools. We're putting them into the appropriate storage models within Google, and then normalize the data into BigQuery, and only then can you take advantage of tools like ThoughtSpot, so, here's a company like ThoughtSpot, and they're all about simplifying data, democratizing data, but to get there, you have to go through some pretty complex processes, so, this is a good example. All right, another comment. "In order to use Google's AI tools, we have to put the data into BigQuery. They haven't integrated in the way AWS and Snowflake have with SageMaker. Moving the data is too expensive, time consuming, and risky," so, I'll just say this, sharing data is a killer super cloud use case, and firms like Snowflake are on top of it, but it's still not pretty across clouds, and Google's posture seems to be, "We're going to let our database product competitiveness drive the strategy first, and the ecosystem is going to take a backseat." Now, in a way, I get it, owning the database is critical, and Google doesn't want to capitulate on that front. Look, BigQuery is really good and competitive, but you can't help but roll your eyes when a CEO stands up, and look, I'm not calling out Thomas Kurian, every CEO does this, and talks about how important their customers are, and they'll do whatever is right by the customer, so, look, I'm telling you, I'm rolling my eyes on that. Now let me also comment, AWS has figured this out. They're killing it in database. If you take Redshift for example, it's still growing, as is Aurora, really fast growing services and other data stores, but AWS realizes it can make more money in the long-term partnering with the Snowflakes and Databricks of the world, and other ecosystem vendors versus sub optimizing their relationships with partners and customers in order to sell more of their own homegrown tools. I get it. It's hard not to feature your own product. IBM chose OS/2 over Windows, and tried for years to popularize it. It failed. Lotus, go back way back to Lotus 1, 2, and 3, they refused to run on Windows when it first came out. They were running on DEC VAX. Many of you young people in the United States have never even heard of DEC VAX. IBM wanted to run every everything only in its cloud, the same with Oracle, originally. VMware, as you might recall, tried to build its own cloud, but, eventually, when the market speaks and reveals what seems to be obvious to analysts, years before, the vendors come around, they face reality, and they stop wasting money, fighting a losing battle. "The trend is your friend," as the saying goes. All right, last pull quote on data, "The hardest part is transformations, moving traditional Informatica, Teradata, or Oracle infrastructure to something more modern and real time, and that's why people still run apps in COBOL. In IT, we rarely get rid of stuff, rather we add on another coat of paint until the wood rots out or the roof is going to cave in. All right, the last key finding we want to highlight is going to bring us back to the cloud repatriation myth. Followers of this program know it's a real sore spot with us. We've heard the stories about repatriation, we've read the thoughtful articles from VCs on the subject, we've been whispered to by vendors that you should investigate this trend. It's really happening, but the data simply doesn't support it. Here's the question that was posed to these practitioners. If you had unlimited budget and the economy miraculously flipped, what initiatives would you tackle first? Where would you really lean into? The first answer, "I'd rip out legacy on-prem infrastructure and move to the cloud even faster," so, the thing here is, look, maybe renting infrastructure is more expensive than owning, maybe, but if I can optimize my rental with better utilization, turn off compute, use things like serverless, get on a steeper and higher performance over time, and lower cost Silicon curve with things like Graviton, tap best of breed tools in AI, and other areas that make my business more competitive. Move faster, fail faster, experiment more quickly, and cheaply, what's that worth? Even the most hard-o CFOs understand the business benefits far outweigh the possible added cost per gigabyte, and, again, I stress "possible." Okay, other interesting comments from practitioners. "I'd hire 50 more data engineers and accelerate our real-time data capabilities to better target customers." Real-time is becoming a thing. AI is being injected into data and apps to make faster decisions, perhaps, with less or even no human involvement. That's on the rise. Next quote, "I'd like to focus on resolving the concerns around cloud data compliance," so, again, despite the risks of data being spread out in different clouds, organizations realize cloud is a given, and they want to find ways to make it work better, not move away from it. The same thing in the next one, "I would automate the data analytics pipeline and focus on a safer way to share data across the states without moving it," and, finally, "The way I'm addressing complexity is to standardize on a single cloud." MonoCloud is actually a thing. We're hearing this more and more. Yes, my company has multiple clouds, but in my group, we've standardized on a single cloud to simplify things, and this is a somewhat dangerous trend, because it's creating even more silos and it's an opportunity that needs to be addressed, and that's why we've been talking so much about supercloud is a cross-cloud, unifying, architectural framework, or, perhaps, it's a platform. In fact, that's a question that we will be exploring later this month at Supercloud2 live from our Palo Alto Studios. Is supercloud an architecture or is it a platform? And in this program, we're featuring technologists, analysts, practitioners to explore the intersection between data and cloud and the future of cloud computing, so, you don't want to miss this opportunity. Go to supercloud.world. You can register for free and participate in the event directly. All right, thanks for listening. That's a wrap. I'd like to thank Alex Myerson, who's on production and manages our podcast, Ken Schiffman as well, Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight, they helped get the word out on social media, and in our newsletters, and Rob Hof is our editor-in-chief over at siliconangle.com. He does some great editing. Thank you, all. Remember, all these episodes are available as podcasts wherever you listen. All you've got to do is search "breaking analysis podcasts." I publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com where you can email me directly at david.vellante@siliconangle.com or DM me, @Dante, or comment on our LinkedIn posts. By all means, check out etr.ai. They get the best survey data in the enterprise tech business. We'll be doing our annual predictions post in a few weeks, once the data comes out from the January survey. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, everybody, and we'll see you next time on "Breaking Analysis." (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
This is "Breaking Analysis" and the director of engineering
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Hof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kristen Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Thomas Kurian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
6% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.99+ |
18,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
January | DATE | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
January 17th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lotus 1 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
8% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
david.vellante@siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Snowflakes | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lotus | TITLE | 0.99+ |
two factors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dataproc | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Supercloud2 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Teradata | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
1% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Windows | TITLE | 0.99+ |
5% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
BigQuery | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Second quote | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DEC VAX | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Thanksgiving | EVENT | 0.98+ |
OS/2 | TITLE | 0.98+ |
7% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
two primary sources | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each week | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Informatica | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.97+ |
first answer | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
2% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
around 800,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
50 more data engineers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
single cloud | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
2 | TITLE | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
ETR | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
single cloud | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ | |
later this month | DATE | 0.94+ |
Ignite22 Analysis | Palo Alto Networks Ignite22
>>The Cube presents Ignite 22, brought to you by Palo Alto Networks. >>Welcome back everyone. We're so glad that you're still with us. It's the Cube Live at the MGM Grand. This is our second day of coverage of Palo Alto Networks Ignite. This is takeaways from Ignite 22. Lisa Martin here with two really smart guys, Dave Valante. Dave, we're joined by one of our cube alumni, a friend, a friend of the, we say friend of the Cube. >>Yeah, otc. A friend of the Cube >>Karala joined us. Guys, it's great to have you here. It's been an exciting show. A lot of cybersecurity is one of my favorite topics to talk about. But I'd love to get some of the big takeaways from both of you. Dave, we'll start with you. >>A breathing room from two weeks ago. Yeah, that was, that was really pleasant. You know, I mean, I know was, yes, you sat in the analyst program, interested in what your takeaways were from there. But, you know, coming into this, we wrote a piece, Palo Alto's Gold Standard, what they need to do to, to keep that, that status. And we hear it a lot about consolidation. That's their big theme now, which is timely, right? Cause people wanna save money, they wanna do more with less. But I'm really interested in hearing zeus's thoughts on how that's playing in the market. How customers, how easy is it to just say, oh, hey, I'm gonna consolidate. I wanna get into that a little bit with you, how well the strategy's working. We're gonna get into some of the m and a activity and really bring your perspectives to the table. Well, >>It's, it's not easy. I mean, people have been calling for the consolidation of security for decades, and it's, it's, they're the first company that's actually made it happen. Right? And, and I think this is what we're seeing here is the culmination of this long term strategy, this company trying to build more of a platform. And they, you know, they, they came out as a firewall vendor. And I think it's safe to say they're more than firewall today. That's only about two thirds of their revenue now. So down from 80% a few years ago. And when I think of what Palo Alto has become, they're really a data company. Now, if you look at, you know, unit 42 in Cortex, the, the, the Cortex Data Lake, they've done an excellent job of taking telemetry from their products and from the acquisitions they have, right? And bringing that together into one big data lake. >>And then they're able to use that to, to do faster threat notification, forensics, things like that. And so I think the old model of security of create signatures for known threats, it's safe to say it never really worked and it wasn't ever gonna work. You had too many day zero exploits and things. The only way to fight security today is with a AI and ML based analytics. And they have, they're the gold standard. I think the one thing about your post that I would add the gold standard from a data standpoint, and that's given them this competitive advantage to go out and become a platform for a security. Which, like I said, the people have tried to do that for years. And the first one that's actually done it, well, >>We've heard this from some of the startups, like Lacework will say, oh, we treat security as a data problem. Of course there's a startup, Palo Alto's got, you know, whatever, 10, 15 years of, of, of history. But one of the things I wanted to explore with you coming into this was the notion of can you be best of breed and develop a suite? And we, we've been hearing a consistent answer to that question, which is, and, and do you need to, and the answer is, well, best of breed in security requires that full spectrum, that full view. So here's my question to you. So, okay, let's take Esty win relatively new for these guys, right? Yeah. Okay. And >>And one of the few products are not top two, top three in, right? Exactly. >>Yeah. So that's why I want to take that. Yeah. Because in bakeoffs, they're gonna lose on a head-to-head best of breed. And so the customer's gonna say, Hey, you know, I love your, your consolidation play, your esty win's. Just, okay, how about a little discount on that? And you know, these guys are premium priced. Yes. So, you know, are they in essentially through their pricing strategies, sort of creating that stuff, fighting that, is that friction for them where they've got, you know, the customer says, all right, well forget it, we're gonna go stove pipe with the SD WAN will consolidate some of the stuff. Are you seeing that? >>Yeah, I, I, I still think the sales model is that way. And I think that's something they need to work on changing. If they get into a situation where they have to get down into a feature battle of my SD WAN versus your SD wan, my firewall versus your firewall, frankly they've already lost, you know, because their value prop is the suite and, and is the platform. And I was talking to the CISO here that told me, he realizes now that you don't need best of breed everywhere to have best in class threat protection. In fact, best of breed everywhere leads to suboptimal threat protection. Cuz you have all these data data sets that are in silos, right? And so from a data scientist standpoint, right, there's the good data leads to good insights. Well, partial data leads to fragmented insights and that's, that's what the best, best of breed approach gives you. And so I was talking with Palo about this, can they have this vision of being best of breed and platform? I don't really think you can maintain best of breed everywhere across this portfolio this big, but you don't need to. >>That was my second point of my >>Question. That's the point. >>Yeah. And so, cuz cuz because you know, we've talked about this, that that sweets always win in the long run, >>Sweets >>Win. Yeah. But here's the thing, I, I wonder to your your point about, you know, the customer, you know, understanding that that that, that this resonates with them. I, my guess is a lot of customers, you know, at that mid-level and the fat middle are like still sort of wed, you know, hugging that, that tool. So there's, there's work to be done here, but I think they, they, they got it right Because if they devolve, to your point, if they devolve down to that speeds and feeds, eh, what's the point of that? Where's their valuable? >>You do not wanna get into a knife fight. And I, and I, and I think for them the, a big challenge now is convincing customers that the suite, the suite approach does work. And they have to be able to do that in actual customer examples. And so, you know, I I interviewed a bunch of customers here and the ones that have bought into XDR and xor and even are looking at their sim have told me that the, the, so think of soc operations, the old way heavily manually oriented, right? You have multiple panes of glass and you know, and then you've got, so there's a lot of people work before you bring the tools in, right? If done correctly with AI and ml, the machines would do all the heavy lifting and then you'd bring people in at the end to clean up the little bits that were missed, right? >>And so you, you moved to, from something that was very people heavy to something that's machine heavy and machines can work a lot faster than people. And the, and so the ones that I've talked that have, that have done that have said, look, our engineers have moved on to a lot different things. They're doing penetration testing, they're, you know, helping us with, with strategy and they're not fighting that, that daily fight of looking through log files. And the only proof point you need, Dave, is look at every big breach that we've had over the last five years. There's some SIM vendor up there that says, we caught it. Yeah. >>Yeah. We we had the data. >>Yeah. But, but, but the security team missed it. Well they missed it because you're, nobody can look at that much data manually. And so the, I I think their approach of relying heavily on machines to fight the fight is actually the right way. >>Is that a differentiator for them versus, we were talking before we went live that you and I first hit our very first segment back in 2017 at Fort Net. Is that, where do the two stand in your >>Yeah, it's funny cuz if you talk to the two vendors, they don't really see each other in a lot of accounts because Fort Net's more small market mid-market. It's the same strategy to some degree where Fort Net relies heavily on in-house development and Palo Alto relies heavily on acquisition. Yeah. And so I think from a consistently feature set, you know, Fort Net has an advantage there because it, it's all run off their, their their silicon. Where, where Palo's able to innovate very quickly. The, it it requires a lot of work right? To, to bring the front end and back ends together. But they're serving different markets. So >>Do you see that as a differentiator? The integration strategy that Palo Alto has as a differentiator? We talk to so many companies who have an a strong m and a strategy and, and execution arm. But the challenge is always integrating the technology so that the customer to, you know, ultimately it's the customer. >>I actually think they're, they're underrated as a, an acquirer. In fact, Dave wrote a post to a prior on Silicon Angle prior to Accelerate and he, he on, you put it on Twitter and you asked people to rank 'em as an acquirer and they were in the middle of the pack, >>Right? It was, it was. So it was Oracle, VMware, emc, ibm, Cisco, ServiceNow, and Palo Alto. Yeah. Or Oracle got very high marks. It was like 8.5 out of, you know, 10. Yeah. VMware I think was 6.5. Nice. Era was high emc, big range. IBM five to seven. Cisco was three to eight. Yeah. Yeah, right. ServiceNow was a seven. And then, yeah, Palo Alto was like a five. And I, which I think it was unfair. >>Well, and I think it depends on how you look at it. And I, so I think a lot of the acquisitions Palo Altos made, they've done a good job of integrating their backend data and they've almost ignored the front end. And so when you buy some of the products, it's a little clunky today. You know, if you work with Prisma Cloud, it could be a little bit cleaner. And even with, you know, the SD wan that took 'em a long time to bring CloudGenix in and stuff. But I think the approach is right. I don't, I don't necessarily believe you should integrate the front end until you've integrated the back end. >>That's >>The hard part, right? Because UL ultimately what you're gonna get, you're gonna get two panes of glass and one pane of glass and it might look pretty all mush together, but ultimately you're not solving the bigger problem, right. Of, of being able to create that big data like the, the fight security. And so I think, you know, the approach they've taken is the right one. I think from a user standpoint, maybe it doesn't show up as neatly because you don't see the frontend integration, but the way they're doing it is the right way to do it. And I'm glad they're doing it that way versus caving to the pressures of what, you know, the industry might want >>Showed up in the performance of the company. I mean, this company was basically gonna double revenues to 7 billion from 2020 to >>2023. Three. Think about that at that, that >>Make a, that's unbelievable, right? I mean, and then and they wanna double again. Yeah. You know, so, well >>What did, what did Nikesh was quoted as saying they wanna be the first cyber company that's a hundred billion dollars. He didn't give a timeline market cap. >>Right. >>Market cap, right. Do what I wanna get both of your opinions on what you saw and heard and felt this week. What do you think the likelihood is? And and do you have any projections on how, you know, how many years it's gonna take for them to get there? >>Well, >>Well I think so if they're gonna get that big, right? And, and we were talking about this pre-show, any company that's becoming a big company does it through ecosystem >>Bingo. >>Right? And that when you look around the show floor, it's not that impressive. And if that, if there's an area they need to focus on, it's building that ecosystem. And it's not with other security vendors, it's with application vendors and it's with the cloud companies and stuff. And they've got some relationships there, but they need to do more. I actually challenge 'em on that. One of the analyst sessions. They said, look, we've got 800 cortex partners. Well where are they? Right? Why isn't there a cortex stand here with a bunch of the small companies here? So I do think that that is an area they need to focus on. If they are gonna get to that, that market caps number, they will do so do so through ecosystem. Because every company that's achieved that has done it through ecosystem. >>A hundred percent agree. And you know, if you look at CrowdStrike's ecosystem, it's pretty similar. Yeah. You know, it doesn't really, you know, make much, much, not much different from this, but I went back and just looked at some, you know, peak valuations during the pandemic and shortly thereafter CrowdStrike was 70 billion. You know, that's what their roughly their peak Palo Alto was 56, fortune was 59 for the actually diverged. Right. And now Palo Alto has taken the, the top mantle, you know, today it's market cap's 52. So it's held 93% of its peak value. Everybody else is tanking. Even Okta was 45 billion. It's been crushed as you well know. But, so Palo Alto wasn't always, you know, the number one in terms of market cap. But I guess my point is, look, if CrowdStrike could got to 70 billion during Yeah. During the frenzy, I think it's gonna take, to answer your question, I think it's gonna be five years. Okay. Before they get back there. I think this market's gonna be tough for a while from a valuation standpoint. I think generally tech is gonna kind of go up and down and sideways for a good year and a half, maybe even two years could be even longer. And then I think there's gonna be some next wave of productivity innovation that that hits. And then you're gonna, you're almost always gonna exceed the previous highs. It's gonna take a while. Yeah, >>Yeah, yeah. But I think their ability to disrupt the SIM market actually is something I, I believe they're gonna do. I've been calling for the death of the sim for a long time and I know some people at Palo Alto are very cautious about saying that cuz the Splunks and the, you know, they're, they're their partners. But I, I think the, you know, it's what I said before, the, the tools are catching them, but they're, it's not in a way that's useful for the IT pro and, but I, I don't think the SIM vendors have that ecosystem of insight across network cloud endpoint. Right. Which is what you need in order to make a sim useful. >>CISO at an ETR roundtable said, if, if it weren't for my regulators, I would chuck my sim. >>Yes. >>But that's the only reason that, that this person was keeping it. So, >>Yeah. And I think the, the fact that most of those companies have moved to a perpetual MO or a a recurring revenue model actually helps unseat them. Typically when you pour a bunch of money into something, you remember the old computer associate days, nobody ever took it out cuz the sunk dollars you spent to do it. But now that you're paying an annual recurring fee, it's actually makes it easier to take out. So >>Yeah, it's it's an ebb and flow, right? Yeah. Because the maintenance costs were, you know, relatively low. Maybe it was 20% of the total. And then, you know, once every five years you had to do a refresh and you were still locked into the sort of maintenance and, and so yeah, I think you're right. The switching costs with sas, you know, in theory anyway, should be less >>Yeah. As long as you can migrate the data over. And I think they've got a pretty good handle on that. So, >>Yeah. So guys, I wanna get your perspective as a whole bunch of announcements here. We've only been here for a couple days, not a big conference as, as you can see from behind us. What Zs in your opinion was Palo Alto's main message and and what do you think about it main message at this event? And then same question for you. >>Yeah, I, I think their message largely wrapped around disruption, right? And, and they, in The's keynote already talked about that, right? And where they disrupted the firewall market by creating a NextGen firewall. In fact, if you look at all the new services they added to their firewall, you, you could almost say it's a NextGen NextGen firewall. But, but I do think the, the work they've done in the area of cloud and cortex actually I think is, is pretty impressive. And I think that's the, the SOC is ripe for disruption because it's for, for the most part, most socks still, you know, run off legacy playbooks. They run off legacy, you know, forensic models and things and they don't work. It's why we have so many breaches today. The, the dirty little secret that nobody ever wants to talk about is the bad guys are using machine learning, right? And so if you're using a signature based model, all they're do is tweak their model a little bit and it becomes, it bypasses them. So I, I think the only way to fight the the bad guys today is with you gotta fight fire with fire. And I think that's, that's the path they've, they've headed >>Down and the bad guys are hiding in plain sight, you know? >>Yeah, yeah. Well it's, it's not hard to do now with a lot of those legacy tools. So >>I think, I think for me, you know, the stat that we threw out earlier, I think yesterday at our keynote analysis was, you know, the ETR data shows that are, that are that last survey around 35% of the respondents said we are actively consolidating, sorry, 44%, sorry, 35 says we're actively consolidating vendors, redundant vendors today. That number's up to 44%. Yeah. It's by far the number one cost optimization technique. That's what these guys are pitching. And I think it's gonna resonate with people and, and I think to your point, they're integrating at the backend, their beeps are technical, right? I mean, they can deal with that complexity. Yeah. And so they don't need eye candy. Eventually they, they, they want to have that cuz it'll allow 'em to have deeper market penetration and make people more productive. But you know, that consolidation message came through loud and clear. >>Yeah. The big change in this industry too is all the new startups are all cloud native, right? They're all built on Amazon or Google or whatever. Yeah. And when your cloud native and you buy a cloud native integration is fast. It's not like having to integrate this big monolithic software stack anymore. Right. So I I think their pace of integration will only accelerate from here because everything's now cloud native. >>If a customer comes to you or when a customer comes to you and says, Zs help us with this cyber transformation we have, our board isn't necessarily with our executives in terms of execution of a security strategy. How do you advise them where Palo Alto is concerned? >>Yeah. You know, a lot, a lot of this is just fighting legacy mindset. And I've, I was talking with some CISOs here from state and local governments and things and they're, you know, they can't get more budget. They're fighting the tide. But what they did find is through the use of automation technology, they're able to bring their people costs way down. Right. And then be able to use that budget to invest in a lot of new projects. And so with that, you, you have to start with your biggest pain points, apply automation where you can, and then be able to use that budget to reinvest back in your security strategy. And it's good for the IT pros too, the security pros, my advice to, to it pros is if you're doing things today that aren't resume building, stop doing them. Right? Find a way to automate the money your job. And so if you're patching systems and you're looking through log files, there's no reason machines can't do that. And you go do something a lot more interesting. >>So true. It's like storage guys 10 years ago, provisioning loans. Yes. It's like, stop doing that. Yeah. You're gonna be outta a job. And so who, last question I have is, is who do you see as the big competitors, the horses on the track question, right? So obviously Cisco kind of service has led for a while and you know, big portfolio company, CrowdStrike coming at it from end point. You know who, who, who do you see as the real players going for that? You know, right now the market's three to 4%. The leader has three, three 4% of the market. You know who they're all going for? 10, 15, maybe 20% of the market. Who, who are the likely candidates? Yeah, >>I don't know if CrowdStrike really has the breadth of portfolio to compete long term though. I I think they've had a nice run, but I, we might start to see the follow 'em. I think Microsoft is gonna be for middle. They've laid down the gauntlet, right? They are a security vendor, right? We, we were at Reinvent and a AWS is the platform for security vendors. Yes. Middle, somewhere in the middle. But Microsoft make no mistake, they're in security. They've got some good products. I think a lot of 'em are kind of good enough and they, they tie it to the licensing and I'm not sure that works in security, but they've certainly got the ear of a lot of it pros. >>It might work in smb. >>Yeah. Yeah. It, it might. And, and I do like Zscaler. I, I know these guys poo poo the proxy model, but they've, they've done about as much with proxies as you can. And I, I think it's, it's a battle of, I love the, the, the near, you know, proxies are dead and Jay's model, you know, Jay over at c skater throw 'em back at 'em. So I, it's good to see that kind of fight going on between the two. >>Oh, it's great. Well, and, and again, ZScaler's coming at it from their cloud security angle. CrowdStrike's coming at it from endpoint. I, I do think CrowdStrike has an opportunity to build out the portfolio through m and a and maybe ecosystem. And then obviously, you know, Palo Alto's getting it done. How about Cisco? >>Yeah. Cisco's interesting. And I, I think if Cisco can make the network matter in security and it should, right? We're talking about how a lot of you need a lot of forensics to fight security today. Well, they're gonna see things long before anybody else because they have all that network data. If they can tie network security, I, I mean they could really have that business take off. But we've been saying that about Cisco for 20 years. >>But big install based though. Yeah. It's hard for a company, any company to just say, okay, hey Cisco customer sweep the floor and come with us. That's, that's >>A tough thing. They have a lot of good peace parts, right? And like duo's a good product and umbrella's a good product. They've, they've not done a good job. >>They're the opposite of these guys. >>They've not done a good job of the backend integration that, that's where Cisco needs to, to focus. And I do think g G two Patel there fixed the WebEx group and I think he's now, in fact when you talk to him, he's doing very little on WebEx that that group's running itself and he's more focused in security. So I, I think we could see a resurgence there. But you know, they have a, from a revenue perspective, it's a little misleading cuz they have this big legacy base that's in decline while they're moving to cloud and stuff. So, but they, but they, there's a lot of work there're trying to, to tie to network. >>Right. Lots of fuel for conversation. We're gonna have to carry this on, on Silicon angle.com guys. Yes. And Wikibon, lets do see us. Thank you so much for joining Dave and me giving us your insights as to this event. Where are you gonna be next? Are you gonna be on vacation? >>There's nothing more fun than mean on the cube, so, right. What's outside of that though? Yeah, you know, Christmas coming up, I gotta go see family and do the obligatory, although for me that's a lot of travel, so I guess >>More planes. Yeah. >>Hopefully not in Vegas. >>Not in Vegas. >>Awesome. Nothing against Vegas. Yeah, no, >>We love it. We >>Love it. Although I will say my year started off with ces. Yeah. And it's finishing up with Palo Alto here. The bookends. Yeah, exactly. In Vegas bookends. >>Well thanks so much for joining us. Thank you Dave. Always a pleasure to host a show with you and hear your insights. Reading your breaking analysis always kicks off my prep for show and it's always great to see, but predictions come true. So thank you for being my co-host bet. All right. For Dave Valante Enz as Carla, I'm Lisa Martin. You've been watching The Cube, the leader in live, emerging and enterprise tech coverage. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube Live at A friend of the Cube Guys, it's great to have you here. You know, I mean, I know was, yes, you sat in the analyst program, interested in what your takeaways were And they, you know, they, they came out as a firewall vendor. And so I think the old model of security of create Palo Alto's got, you know, whatever, 10, 15 years of, of, of history. And one of the few products are not top two, top three in, right? And so the customer's gonna say, Hey, you know, I love your, your consolidation play, And I think that's something they need to work on changing. That's the point. win in the long run, my guess is a lot of customers, you know, at that mid-level and the fat middle are like still sort And so, you know, I I interviewed a bunch of customers here and the ones that have bought into XDR And the only proof point you need, Dave, is look at every big breach that we've had over the last And so the, I I think their approach of relying heavily on Is that a differentiator for them versus, we were talking before we went live that you and I first hit our very first segment back And so I think from a consistently you know, ultimately it's the customer. Silicon Angle prior to Accelerate and he, he on, you put it on Twitter and you asked people to you know, 10. And even with, you know, the SD wan that took 'em a long time to bring you know, the approach they've taken is the right one. I mean, this company was basically gonna double revenues to 7 billion Think about that at that, that I mean, and then and they wanna double again. What did, what did Nikesh was quoted as saying they wanna be the first cyber company that's a hundred billion dollars. And and do you have any projections on how, you know, how many years it's gonna take for them to get And that when you look around the show floor, it's not that impressive. And you know, if you look at CrowdStrike's ecosystem, it's pretty similar. But I, I think the, you know, it's what I said before, the, the tools are catching I would chuck my sim. But that's the only reason that, that this person was keeping it. you remember the old computer associate days, nobody ever took it out cuz the sunk dollars you spent to do it. And then, you know, once every five years you had to do a refresh and you were still And I think they've got a pretty good handle on that. Palo Alto's main message and and what do you think about it main message at this event? So I, I think the only way to fight the the bad guys today is with you gotta fight Well it's, it's not hard to do now with a lot of those legacy tools. I think, I think for me, you know, the stat that we threw out earlier, I think yesterday at our keynote analysis was, And when your cloud native and you buy a cloud native If a customer comes to you or when a customer comes to you and says, Zs help us with this cyber transformation And you go do something a lot more interesting. of service has led for a while and you know, big portfolio company, CrowdStrike coming at it from end point. I don't know if CrowdStrike really has the breadth of portfolio to compete long term though. I love the, the, the near, you know, proxies are dead and Jay's model, And then obviously, you know, Palo Alto's getting it done. And I, I think if Cisco can hey Cisco customer sweep the floor and come with us. And like duo's a good product and umbrella's a good product. And I do think g G two Patel there fixed the WebEx group and I think he's now, Thank you so much for joining Dave and me giving us your insights as to this event. you know, Christmas coming up, I gotta go see family and do the obligatory, although for me that's a lot of travel, Yeah. Yeah, no, We love it. And it's finishing up with Palo Alto here. Always a pleasure to host a show with you and hear your insights.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fort Net | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
93% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Carla | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
7 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
70 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
44% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
45 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
52 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
59 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two vendors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Karala | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ibm | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
8.5 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Altos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante Enz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two panes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
56 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Christmas | EVENT | 0.99+ |
ServiceNow | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.99+ |
35 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Reinvent | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
The Cube | TITLE | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
WebEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first segment | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
emc | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two weeks ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Takeaways from Ignite22 | Palo Alto Networks Ignite22
>>The Cube presents Ignite 22, brought to you by Palo Alto Networks. >>Welcome back everyone. We're so glad that you're still with us. It's the Cube Live at the MGM Grand. This is our second day of coverage of Palo Alto Networks Ignite. This is takeaways from Ignite 22. Lisa Martin here with two really smart guys, Dave Valante. Dave, we're joined by one of our cube alumni, a friend, a friend of the, we say friend of the Cube. >>Yeah, F otc. A friend of the Cube >>Karala joins us. Guys, it's great to have you here. It's been an exciting show. A lot of cybersecurity is one of my favorite topics to talk about. But I'd love to get some of the big takeaways from both of you. Dave, we'll start with >>You. A breathing room from two weeks ago. Yeah, that was, that was really pleasant. You know, I mean, I know was, yes, you sat in the analyst program, interested in what your takeaways were from there. But, you know, coming into this, we wrote a piece, Palo Alto's Gold Standard, what they need to do to, to keep that, that status. And we hear it a lot about consolidation. That's their big theme now, which is timely, right? Cause people wanna save money, they wanna do more with less. But I'm really interested in hearing zeus's thoughts on how that's playing in the market. How customers, how easy is it to just say, oh, hey, I'm gonna consolidate. I wanna get into that a little bit with you, how well the strategy's working. We're gonna get into some of the m and a activity and really bring your perspectives to the table. Well, >>It's, it's not easy. I mean, people have been calling for the consolidation of security for decades, and it's, it's, they're the first company that's actually made it happen. Right? And, and I think this is what we're seeing here is the culmination of this long-term strategy, this company trying to build more of a platform. And they, you know, they, they came out as a firewall vendor. And I think it's safe to say they're more than firewall today. That's only about two thirds of their revenue now. So down from 80% a few years ago. And when I think of what Palo Alto has become, they're really a data company. Now, if you look at, you know, unit 42 in Cortex, the, the, the Cortex Data Lake, they've done an excellent job of taking telemetry from their products and from the acquisitions they have, right? And bringing that together into one big data lake. >>And then they're able to use that to, to do faster threat notification, forensics, things like that. And so I think the old model of security of create signatures for known threats, it's safe to say it never really worked and it wasn't ever gonna work. You had too many days, zero exploits and things. The only way to fight security today is with a AI and ML based analytics. And they have, they're the gold standard. I think the one thing about your post that I would add, they're the gold standard from a data standpoint. And that's given them this competitive advantage to go out and become a platform for security. Which, like I said, the people have tried to do that for years. And the first one that's actually done it, well, >>We've heard this from some of the startups, like Lacework will say, oh, we treat security as a data problem. Of course there's a startup, Palo Alto's got, you know, whatever, 10, 15 years of, of, of history. But one of the things I wanted to explore with you coming into this was the notion of can you be best of breed and develop a suite? And we, we've been hearing a consistent answer to that question, which is, and, and do you need to, and the answer is, well, best of breed in security requires that full spectrum, that full view. So here's my question to you. So, okay, let's take Estee win relatively new for these guys, right? Yeah. Okay. And >>And one of the few products are not top two, top three in, right? >>Exactly. Yeah. So that's why I want to take that. Yeah. Because in bakeoffs, they're gonna lose on a head-to-head best of breed. And so the customer's gonna say, Hey, you know, I love your, your consolidation play, your esty win's. Just, okay, how about a little discount on that? And you know, these guys are premium priced. Yes. So, you know, are they in essentially through their pricing strategies, sort of creating that stuff, fighting that, is that friction for them where they've got, you know, the customer says, all right, well forget it, we're gonna go stove pipe with the SD WAN will consolidate some of the stuff. Are you seeing that? >>Yeah, I, I, I still think the sales model is that way. And I think that's something they need to work on changing. If they get into a situation where they have to get down into a feature battle of my SD WAN versus your SD wan, my firewall versus your firewall, frankly they've already lost, you know, because their value prop is the suite and, and is the platform. And I was talking with the CISO here that told me, he realizes now that you don't need best of breed everywhere to have best in class threat protection. In fact, best of breed everywhere leads to suboptimal threat protection. Cuz you have all these data data sets that are in silos, right? And so from a data scientist standpoint, right, there's the good data leads to good insights. Well, partial data leads to fragmented insights and that's, that's what the best, best of breed approach gives you. And so I was talking with Palo about this, can they have this vision of being best of breed and platform? I don't really think you can maintain best of breed everywhere across this portfolio this big, but you don't need to. >>That was my second point of my question. That's the point I'm saying. Yeah. And so, cuz cuz because you know, we've talked about this, that that sweets always win in the long run, >>Sweets win. >>Yeah. But here's the thing, I, I wonder to your your point about, you know, the customer, you know, understanding that that that, that this resonates with them. I, my guess is a lot of customers, you know, at that mid-level and the fat middle are like still sort of wed, you know, hugging that, that tool. So there's, there's work to be done here, but I think they, they, they got it right Because if they devolve, to your point, if they devolve down to that speeds and feeds, eh, what's the point of that? Where's their >>Valuable? You do not wanna get into a knife fight. And I, and I, and I think for them the, a big challenge now is convincing customers that the suite, the suite approach does work. And they have to be able to do that in actual customer examples. And so, you know, I I interviewed a bunch of customers here and the ones that have bought into XDR and xor and even are looking at their sim have told me that the, the, so think of soc operations, the old way heavily manually oriented, right? You have multiple panes of glass and you know, and then you've got, so there's a lot of people work before you bring the tools in, right? If done correctly with AI and ml, the machines would do all the heavy lifting and then you'd bring people in at the end to clean up the little bits that were missed, right? >>And so you, you moved to, from something that was very people heavy to something that's machine heavy and machines can work a lot faster than people. And the, and so the ones that I've talked that have, that have done that have said, look, our engineers have moved on to a lot different things. They're doing penetration testing, they're, you know, helping us with, with strategy and they're not fighting that, that daily fight of looking through log files. And the only proof point you need, Dave, is look at every big breach that we've had over the last five years. There's some SIM vendor up there that says, we caught it. Yeah. >>Yeah. We we had the data. >>Yeah. But, but, but the security team missed it. Well they missed it because you're, nobody can look at that much data manually. And so the, I I think their approach of relying heavily on machines to fight the fight is actually the right way. >>Is that a differentiator for them versus, we were talking before we went live that you and I first hit our very first segment back in 2017 at Fort Net. Is that, where do the two stand in your >>Yeah, it's funny cuz if you talk to the two vendors, they don't really see each other in a lot of accounts because Fort Net's more small market mid-market. It's the same strategy to some degree where Fort Net relies heavily on in-house development in Palo Alto relies heavily on acquisition. Yeah. And so I think from a consistently feature set, you know, Fort Net has an advantage there because it, it's all run off their, their their silicon. Where, where Palo's able to innovate very quickly. The, it it requires a lot of work right? To, to bring the front end and back ends together. But they're serving different markets. So >>Do you see that as a differentiator? The integration strategy that Palo Alto has as a differentiator? We talk to so many companies who have an a strong m and a strategy and, and execution arm. But the challenge is always integrating the technology so that the customer to, you know, ultimately it's the customer. >>I actually think they're, they're underrated as a, an acquirer. In fact, Dave wrote a post to a prior on Silicon Angle prior to Accelerate and he, he on, you put it on Twitter and you asked people to rank 'em as an acquirer and they were in the middle of the pack, >>Right? It was, it was. So it was Oracle, VMware, emc, ibm, Cisco, ServiceNow, and Palo Alto. Yeah. Or Oracle got very high marks. It was like 8.5 out of, you know, 10. Yeah. VMware I think was 6.5. Naira was high emc, big range. IBM five to seven. Cisco was three to eight. Yeah. Yeah, right. ServiceNow was a seven. And then, yeah, Palo Alto was like a five. And I, which I think it was unfair. Well, >>And I think it depends on how you look at it. And I, so I think a lot of the acquisitions Palo Alto's made, they've done a good job of integrating the backend data and they've almost ignored the front end. And so when you buy some of the products, it's a little clunky today. You know, if you work with Prisma Cloud, it could be a little bit cleaner. And even with, you know, the SD wan that took 'em a long time to bring CloudGenix in and stuff. But I think the approach is right. I don't, I don't necessarily believe you should integrate the front end until you've integrated the back end. >>That's >>The hard part, right? Because UL ultimately what you're gonna get, you're gonna get two panes of glass and one pane of glass and it might look pretty and all mush together, but ultimately you're not solving the bigger problem, right. Of, of being able to create that big data lake to, to fight security. And so I think, you know, the approach they've taken is the right one. I think from a user standpoint, maybe it doesn't show up as neatly because you don't see the frontend integration, but the way they're doing it is the right way to do it. And I'm glad they're doing it that way versus caving to the pressures of what, you know, the industry might want or >>Showed up in the performance of the company. I mean, this company was basically gonna double revenues to 7 billion from 2020 to >>2023. Think about that at that. That makes, >>I mean that's unbelievable, right? I mean, and then and they wanna double again. Yeah. You know, so, well >>What did, what did Nikesh was quoted as saying they wanna be the first cyber company that's a hundred billion dollars. He didn't give a timeline market >>Cap. Right. >>Market cap, right. Do what I wanna get both of your opinions on what you saw and heard and felt this week. What do you think the likelihood is? And and do you have any projections on how, you know, how many years it's gonna take for them to get there? >>Well, >>Well I think so if they're gonna get that big, right? And, and we were talking about this pre-show, any company that's becoming a big company does it through ecosystem >>Bingo >>Go, right? And that when you look around the show floor, it's not that impressive. No. And if that, if there's an area they need to focus on, it's building that ecosystem. And it's not with other security vendors, it's with application vendors and it's with the cloud companies and stuff. And they've got some relationships there, but they need to do more. I actually challenge 'em on that. One of the analyst sessions. They said, look, we've got 800 cortex partners. Well where are they? Right? Why isn't there a cortex stand here with a bunch of the small companies here? So I do think that that is an area they need to focus on. If they are gonna get to that, that market caps number, they will do so do so through ecosystem. Because every company that's achieved that has done it through ecosystem. >>A hundred percent agree. And you know, if you look at CrowdStrike's ecosystem, it's, I mean, pretty similar. Yeah. You know, it doesn't really, you know, make much, much, not much different from this, but I went back and just looked at some, you know, peak valuations during the pandemic and shortly thereafter CrowdStrike was 70 billion. You know, that's what their roughly their peak Palo Alto was 56, fortune was 59 for the actually diverged. Right. And now Palo Alto has taken the, the top mantle, you know, today it's market cap's 52. So it's held 93% of its peak value. Everybody else is tanking. Even Okta was 45 billion. It's been crushed as you well know. But, so Palo Alto wasn't always, you know, the number one in terms of market cap. But I guess my point is, look, if CrowdStrike could got to 70 billion during Yeah. During the frenzy, I think it's gonna take, to answer your question, I think it's gonna be five years. Okay. Before they get back there. I think this market's gonna be tough for a while from a valuation standpoint. I think generally tech is gonna kind of go up and down and sideways for a good year and a half, maybe even two years could be even longer. And then I think there's gonna be some next wave of productivity innovation that that hits. And then you're gonna, you're almost always gonna exceed the previous highs. It's gonna take a while. Yeah. >>Yeah, yeah. But I think their ability to disrupt the SIM market actually is something that I, I believe they're gonna do. I've been calling for the death of the sim for a long time and I know some people of Palo Alto are very cautious about saying that cuz the Splunks and the, you know, they're, they're their partners. But I, I think the, you know, it's what I said before, the, the tools are catching them, but they're, it's not in a way that's useful for the IT pro and, but I, I don't think the SIM vendors have that ecosystem of insight across network cloud endpoint. Right. Which is what you need in order to make a sim useful. >>CISO at an ETR round table said, if, if it weren't for my regulators, I would chuck my sim. >>Yes. >>But that's the only reason that, that this person was keeping it. No. >>Yeah. And I think the, the fact that most of those companies have moved to a perpetual MO or a a recurring revenue model actually helps unseat them. Typically when you pour a bunch of money into something, you remember the old computer associate says nobody ever took it out cuz the sunk dollars you spent to do it. But now that you're paying an annual recurring fee, it's actually makes it easier to take out. So >>Yeah, it's just an ebb and flow, right? Yeah. Because the maintenance costs were, you know, relatively low. Maybe it was 20% of the total. And then, you know, once every five years you had to do a refresh and you were still locked into the sort of maintenance and, and so yeah, I think you're right. The switching costs with sas, you know, in theory anyway, should be less >>Yeah. As long as you can migrate the data over. And I think they've got a pretty good handle on that. So, >>Yeah. So guys, I wanna get your perspective as a whole bunch of announcements here. We've only been here for a couple days, not a big conference as, as you can see from behind us. What Zs in your opinion was Palo Alto's main message and and what do you think about it main message at this event? And then same question for you. >>Yeah, I, I think their message largely wrapped around disruption, right? And, and they, and The's keynote already talked about that, right? And where they disrupted the firewall market by creating a NextGen firewall. In fact, if you look at all the new services they added to their firewall, you, you could almost say it's a NextGen NextGen firewall. But, but I do think the, the work they've done in the area of cloud and cortex actually I think is, is pretty impressive. And I think that's the, the SOC is ripe for disruption because it's for, for the most part, most socks still, you know, run off legacy playbooks. They run off legacy, you know, forensic models and things and they don't work. It's why we have so many breaches today. The, the dirty little secret that nobody ever wants to talk about is the bad guys are using machine learning, right? And so if you're using a signature based model, all they gotta do is tweak their model a little bit and it becomes, it bypasses them. So I, I think the only way to fight the the bad guys today is with you're gonna fight fire with fire. And I think that's, that's the path they've, they've headed >>Down. Yeah. The bad guys are hiding in plain sight, you know? Yeah, >>Yeah. Well it's, it's not hard to do now with a lot of those legacy tools. So >>I think, I think for me, you know, the stat that we threw out earlier, I think yesterday at our keynote analysis was, you know, the ETR data shows that are, that are that last survey around 35% of the respondents said we are actively consolidating, sorry, 44%, sorry, 35 says who are actively consolidating vendors, redundant vendors today that number's up to 44%. Yeah. It's by far the number one cost optimization technique. That's what these guys are pitching. And I think it's gonna resonate with people and, and I think to your point, they're integrating at the backend, their beeps are technical, right? I mean, they can deal with that complexity. Yeah. And so they don't need eye candy. Eventually they, they, they want to have that cuz it'll allow 'em to have deeper market penetration and make people more productive. But you know, that consolidation message came through loud and clear. >>Yeah. The big change in this industry too is all the new startups are all cloud native, right? They're all built on Amazon or Google or whatever. Yeah. And when your cloud native and you buy a cloud native integration is fast. It's not like having to integrate this big monolithic software stack anymore. Right. So I, I think their pace of integration will only accelerate from here because everything's now cloud native. >>If a customer comes to you or when a customer comes to you and says, Zs help us with this cyber transformation we have, our board isn't necessarily aligned with our executives in terms of execution of a security strategy. How do you advise them where Palo Alto is concerned? >>Yeah. You know, a lot, a lot of this is just fighting legacy mindset. And I've, I was talking with some CISOs here from state and local governments and things and they're, you know, they can't get more budget. They're fighting the tide. But what they did find is through the use of automation technology, they're able to bring their people costs way down. Right. And then be able to use that budget to invest in a lot of new projects. And so with that, you, you have to start with your biggest pain points, apply automation where you can, and then be able to use that budget to reinvest back in your security strategy. And it's good for the IT pros too, the security pros, my advice to the IT pros is, is if you're doing things today that aren't resume building, stop doing them. Right. Find a way to automate the money your job. And so if you're patching systems and you're looking through log files, there's no reason machines can't do that. And you go do something a lot more interesting. >>So true. It's like storage guys 10 years ago, provisioning loans. Yes. It's like, stop doing that. Yeah. You're gonna be outta a job. So who, last question I have is, is who do you see as the big competitors, the horses on the track question, right? So obviously Cisco kind of service has led for a while and you know, big portfolio company, CrowdStrike coming at it from end point. You know who, who, who do you see as the real players going for that? You know, right now the market's three to 4%. The leader has three, three 4% of the market. You know who they're all going for? 10, 15, maybe 20% of the market. Who, who are the likely candidates? Yeah, >>I don't know if CrowdStrike really has the breadth of portfolio to compete long term though. I I think they've had a nice run, but I, we might start to see the follow 'em. I think Microsoft is gonna be for middle. They've laid down the gauntlet, right? They are a security vendor, right? We, we were at Reinvent and a AWS is the platform for security vendors. Yes. Middle, somewhere in the middle. But Microsoft make no mistake, they're in security. They've got some good products. I think a lot of 'em are kind of good enough and they, they tie it to the licensing and I'm not sure that works in security, but they've certainly got the ear of a lot of it pros. >>It might work in smb. >>Yeah, yeah. It, it might. And, and I do like Zscaler. I, I know these guys poo poo the proxy model, but they've, they've done about as much with prox as you can. And I, I think it's, it's a battle of, I love the, the, the near, you know, proxies are dead and Jay's model, you know, Jay over at csca, throw 'em back at 'em. So I, it's good to see that kind of fight going on between the >>Two. Oh, it's great. Well, and, and again, ZScaler's coming at it from their cloud security angle. CrowdStrike's coming at it from endpoint. I, I do think CrowdStrike has an opportunity to build out the portfolio through m and a and maybe ecosystem. And then obviously, you know, Palo Alto's getting it done. How about Cisco? >>Yeah, Cisco's interesting. And I I think if Cisco can make the network matter in security and it should, right? We're talking about how a lot of you need a lot of forensics to fight security today. Well, they're gonna see things long before anybody else because they have all that network data. If they can tie network security, I, I mean they could really have that business take off. But we've been saying that about Cisco for 20 years. >>But big install based though. Yeah. It's hard for a company, any company to say, okay, hey Cisco customer sweep the floor and come with us. That's, that's >>A tough thing. They have a lot of good peace parts, right? And like duo's a good product and umbrella's a good product. They've, they've not done a good job. >>They're the opposite of these guys. >>They've not done a good job of the backend integration and that, that's where Cisco needs to, to focus. And I do think g G two Patel there fixed the WebEx group and I think he's now, in fact when you talk to him, he's doing very little on WebEx that that group's running itself and he's more focused in security. So I, I think we could see a resurgence there. But you know, they have a, from a revenue perspective, it's a little misleading cuz they have this big legacy base that's in decline while they're moving to cloud and stuff. So, but they, but they, there's a lot of Rick there trying to, to tie to network. >>Lots of fuel for conversation. We're gonna have to carry this on, on Silicon angle.com guys. Yes. And Wi KeePon. Lets do see us. Thank you so much for joining Dave and me giving us your insights as to this event. Where are gonna be next? Are you gonna be on >>Vacation? There's nothing more fun than mean on the cube. So what's outside of that though? Yeah, you know, Christmas coming up, I gotta go see family and be the obligatory, although for me that's a lot of travel, so I guess >>More planes. Yeah. >>Hopefully not in Vegas. >>Not in Vegas. >>Awesome. Nothing against Vegas. Yeah, no, >>We love it. We love >>It. Although I will say my year started off with ces. Yeah. And it's finishing up with Palo Alto here. The bookends. Yeah, exactly. In Vegas bookends. >>Well thanks so much for joining us. Thank you Dave. Always a pleasure to host a show with you and hear your insights. Reading your breaking analysis always kicks off my prep for show. And it, it's always great to see, but predictions come true. So thank you for being my co-host bet. All right. For Dave Valante Enz as Carla, I'm Lisa Martin. You've been watching The Cube, the leader in live, emerging and enterprise tech coverage. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
The Cube presents Ignite 22, brought to you by Palo Alto It's the Cube Live at A friend of the Cube Guys, it's great to have you here. You know, I mean, I know was, yes, you sat in the analyst program, interested in what your takeaways were And I think it's safe to say they're more than firewall today. And so I think the old model of security of create Palo Alto's got, you know, whatever, 10, 15 years of, of, of history. And so the customer's gonna say, Hey, you know, I love your, your consolidation play, And I think that's something they need to work on changing. And so, cuz cuz because you know, we've talked about this, my guess is a lot of customers, you know, at that mid-level and the fat middle are like still sort And so, you know, I I interviewed a bunch of customers here and the ones that have bought into XDR And the only proof point you need, Dave, is look at every big breach that we've had over the last five And so the, I I think their approach of relying heavily on Is that a differentiator for them versus, we were talking before we went live that you and I first hit our very first segment back And so I think from a consistently you know, ultimately it's the customer. Angle prior to Accelerate and he, he on, you put it on Twitter and you asked people to rank you know, 10. And I think it depends on how you look at it. you know, the approach they've taken is the right one. I mean, this company was basically gonna double revenues to 7 billion That makes, I mean, and then and they wanna double again. What did, what did Nikesh was quoted as saying they wanna be the first cyber company that's a hundred billion dollars. And and do you have any projections on how, you know, how many years it's gonna take for them to get And that when you look around the show floor, it's not that impressive. And you know, if you look at CrowdStrike's ecosystem, it's, But I, I think the, you know, it's what I said before, the, the tools are catching I would chuck my sim. But that's the only reason that, that this person was keeping it. you remember the old computer associate says nobody ever took it out cuz the sunk dollars you spent to do it. And then, you know, once every five years you had to do a refresh and you were still And I think they've got a pretty good handle on that. Palo Alto's main message and and what do you think about it main message at this event? it's for, for the most part, most socks still, you know, run off legacy playbooks. Yeah, So I think, I think for me, you know, the stat that we threw out earlier, I think yesterday at our keynote analysis was, And when your cloud native and you buy a cloud native If a customer comes to you or when a customer comes to you and says, Zs help us with this cyber transformation And you go do something a lot more interesting. So obviously Cisco kind of service has led for a while and you know, big portfolio company, I don't know if CrowdStrike really has the breadth of portfolio to compete long term though. I love the, the, the near, you know, proxies are dead and Jay's model, And then obviously, you know, Palo Alto's getting it done. And I I think if Cisco can hey Cisco customer sweep the floor and come with us. And like duo's a good product and umbrella's a good product. And I do think g G two Patel there fixed the WebEx group and I think he's now, Thank you so much for joining Dave and me giving us your insights as to this event. you know, Christmas coming up, I gotta go see family and be the obligatory, although for me that's a lot of travel, Yeah. Yeah, no, We love it. And it's finishing up with Palo Alto here. Always a pleasure to host a show with you and hear your insights.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fort Net | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Carla | PERSON | 0.99+ |
70 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
93% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
45 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
7 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante Enz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Karala | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
44% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ibm | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two vendors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
35 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two panes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Christmas | EVENT | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
8.5 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
56 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Reinvent | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lacework | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ServiceNow | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
59 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
emc | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Ignite22 | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two weeks ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Naira | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
The Cube | TITLE | 0.98+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Rick | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Day 1 Keynote Analysis | Palo Alto Networks Ignite22
>> Narrator: "TheCUBE" presents Ignite 22. Brought to you by Palo Alto Networks. >> Hey everyone. Welcome back to "TheCUBE's" live coverage of Palo Alto Network's Ignite 22 from the MGM Grand in beautiful Las Vegas. I am Lisa Martin here with Dave Vellante. Dave, we just had a great conversa- First of all, we got to hear the keynote, most of it. We also just had a great conversation with the CEO and chairman of Palo Alto Networks, Nikesh Arora. You know, this is a company that was founded back in 2005, he's been there four years, a lot has happened. A lot of growth, a lot of momentum in his tenure. You were saying in your breaking analysis, that they are on track to nearly double revenues from FY 20 to 23. Lots of momentum in this cloud security company. >> Yeah, I'd never met him before. I mean, I've been following a little bit. It's interesting, he came in as, sort of, a security outsider. You know, he joked today that he, the host, I forget the guy's name on the stage, what was his name? Hassan. Hassan, he said "He's the only guy in the room that knows less about security than I do." Because, normally, this is an industry that's steeped in deep expertise. He came in and I think is given a good compliment to the hardcore techies at Palo Alto Network. The company, it's really interesting. The company started out building their own data centers, they called it. Now they look back and call it cloud, but it was their own data centers, kind of like Salesforce did, it's kind of like ServiceNow. Because at the time, you really couldn't do it in the public cloud. The public cloud was a little too unknown. And so they needed that type of control. But Palo Alto's been amazing story since 2020, we wrote about this during the pandemic. So what they did, is they began to pivot to the the true cloud native public cloud, which is kind of immature still. They don't tell you that, but it's kind of still a little bit immature, but it's working. And when they were pivoting, it was around the same time, at Fortinet, who's a competitor there's like, I call 'em a poor man's Palo Alto, and Fortinet probably hates that, but it's kind of true. It's like a value play on a comprehensive platform, and you know Fortinet a little bit. And so, but what was happening is Fortinet was executing on its cloud strategy better than Palo Alto. And there was a real divergence in the valuations of these stocks. And we said at the time, we felt like Palo Alto, being the gold standard, would get through it. And they did. And what's happened is interesting, I wrote about this two weeks ago. If you go back to the pandemic, peak of the pandemic, or just before the peak, kind of in that tech bubble, if you will. Splunk's down 44% from that peak, Okta's down, sorry, not down 44%. 44% of the peak. Okta's 22% of their peak. CrowdStrike, 41%, Zscaler, 36%, Fortinet, 71%. Not so bad. Palo Altos maintained 93% of its peak value, right? So it's a combination of two things. One is, they didn't run up as much during the pandemic, and they're executing through their cloud strategy. And that's provided a sort of softer landing. And I think it's going to be interesting to see where they go from here. And you heard Nikesh, we're going to double, and then double again. So that's 7 billion, 14 billion, heading to 30 billion. >> Lisa: Yeah, yeah. He also talked about one of the things that he's done in his tenure here, as really a workforce transformation. And we talk all the time, it's not just technology and processes, it's people. They've also seemed to have done a pretty good job from a cultural transformation perspective, which is benefiting their customers. And they're also growing- The ecosystem, we talked a little bit about the ecosystem with Nikesh. We've got Google Cloud on, we've got AWS on the program today alone, talking about the partnerships. The ecosystem is expanding, as well. >> Have you ever met Nir Zuk? >> I have not, not yet. >> He's the founder and CTO. I haven't, we've never been on "theCUBE." He was supposed to come on one day down in New York City. Stu and I were going to interview him, and he cut out of the conference early, so we didn't interview him. But he's a very opinionated dude. And you're going to see, he's basically going to come on, and I mean, I hope he is as opinionated on "TheCUBE," but he'll talk about how the industry has screwed it up. And Nikesh sort of talked about that, it's a shiny new toy strategy. Oh, there's another one, here's another one. It's the best in that category. Okay, let's get, and that's how we've gotten to this point. I always use that Optive graphic, which shows the taxonomy, and shows hundreds and hundreds of suppliers in the industry. And again, it's true. Customers have 20, 30, sometimes 40 different tool sets. And so now it's going to be interesting to see. So I guess my point is, it starts at the top. The founder, he's an outspoken, smart, tough Israeli, who's like, "We're going to take this on." We're not afraid to be ambitious. And so, so to your point about people and the culture, it starts there. >> Absolutely. You know, one of the things that you've written about in your breaking analysis over the weekend, Nikesh talked about it, they want to be the consolidator. You see this as they're building out the security supercloud. Talk to me about that. What do you think? What is a security supercloud in your opinion? >> Yeah, so let me start with the consolidator. So Palo Alto obviously is executing on that strategy. CrowdStrike as well, wants to be a consolidator. I would say Zscaler wants to be a consolidator. I would say that Microsoft wants to be a consolidator, so does Cisco. So they're all coming at it from different angles. Cisco coming at it from network security, which is Palo Alto's wheelhouse, with their next gen firewalls, network security. What Palo Alto did was interesting, was they started out with kind of a hardware based firewall, but they didn't try to shove everything into it. They put the other function in there, their cloud. Zscaler. Zscaler is the one running around saying you don't need firewalls anymore. Just run everything through our cloud, our security cloud. I would think that as Zscaler expands its TAM, it's going to start to acquire, and do similar types of things. We'll see how that integrates. CrowdStrike is clearly executing on a similar portfolio strategy, but they're coming at it from endpoint, okay? They have to partner for network security. Cisco is this big and legacy, but they've done a really good job of acquiring and using services to hide some of that complexity. Microsoft is, you know, they probably hate me saying this, but it's the just good enough strategy. And that may have hurt CrowdStrike last quarter, because the SMB was a soft, we'll see. But to specifically answer your question, the opportunity, we think, is to build the security supercloud. What does that mean? That means to have a common security platform across all clouds. So irrespective of whether you're running an Amazon, whether you're running an on-prem, Google, or Azure, the security policies, and the edicts, and the way you secure your enterprise, look the same. There's a PaaS layer, super PaaS layer for developers, so that that the developers can secure their code in a common framework across cloud. So that essentially, Nikesh sort of balked at it, said, "No, no, no, we're not, we're not really building a super cloud." But essentially they kind of are headed in that direction, I think. Although, what I don't know, like CrowdStrike and Microsoft are big competitors. He mentioned AWS and Google. We run on AWS, Google, and in their own data centers. That sounds like they don't currently run a Microsoft. 'Cause Microsoft is much more competitive with the security ecosystem. They got Identity, so they compete with Okta. They got Endpoint, so they compete with CrowdStrike, and Palo Alto. So Microsoft's at war with everybody. So can you build a super cloud on top of the clouds, the hyperscalers, and not do Microsoft? I would say no. >> Right. >> But there's nothing stopping Palo Alto from running in the Microsoft cloud. I don't know if that's a strategy, we should ask them. >> Yeah. They've done a great job in our last few minutes, of really expanding their TAM in the last few years, particularly under Nikesh's leadership. What are some of the things that you heard this morning that you think, really they've done a great job of expanding that TAM. He talked a little bit about, I didn't write the number down, but he talked a little bit about the market opportunity there. What do you see them doing as being best of breed for organizations that have 30 to 50 tools and need to consolidate that? >> Well the market opportunity's enormous. >> Lisa: It is. >> I mean, we're talking about, well north of a hundred billion dollars, I mean 150, 180, depending on whose numerator you use. Gartner, IDC. Dave's, whatever, it's big. Okay, and they've got... Okay, they're headed towards 7 billion out of 180 billion, whatever, again, number you use. So they started with network security, they put most of the network function in the cloud. They moved to Endpoint, Sassy for the edge. They've done acquisitions, the Cortex acquisition, to really bring automated threat intelligence. They just bought Cider Security, which is sort of the shift left, code security, developer, assistance, if you will. That whole shift left, protect right. And so I think a lot of opportunities to continue to acquire best of breed. I liked what Nikesh said. Keep the founders on board, sell them on the mission. Let them help with that integration and putting forth the cultural aspects. And then, sort of, integrate in. So big opportunities, do they get into Endpoint and compete with Okta? I think Okta's probably the one sort of outlier. They want to be the consolidator of identity, right? And they'll probably partner with Okta, just like Okta partners with CrowdStrike. So I think that's part of the challenge of being the consolidator. You're probably not going to be the consolidator for everything, but maybe someday you'll see some kind of mega merger of these companies. CrowdStrike and Okta, or Palo Alto and Okta, or to take on Microsoft, which would be kind of cool to watch. >> That would be. We have a great lineup, Dave. Today and tomorrow, full days, two full days of cube coverage. You mentioned Nir Zuk, we already had the CEO on, founder and CTO. We've got the chief product officer coming on next. We've got chief transformation officer of customers, partners. We're going to have great conversations, and really understand how this organization is helping customers ultimately achieve their SecOps transformation, their digital transformation. And really moved the needle forward to becoming secure data companies. So I'm looking forward to the next two days. >> Yeah, and Wendy Whitmore is coming on. She heads Unit 42, which is, from what I could tell, it's pretty much the competitor to Mandiant, which Google just bought. We had Kevin Mandia on at September at the CrowdStrike event. So that's interesting. That's who I was poking Nikesh a little bit on industry collaboration. You're tight with Google, and then he had an interesting answer. He said "Hey, you start sharing data, you don't know where it's going to go." I think Snowflake could help with that problem, actually. >> Interesting. >> Yeah, little Snowflake and some of the announcements ar Reinvent with the data clean rooms. Data sharing, you know, trusted data. That's one of the other things we didn't talk about, is the real tension in between security and regulation. So the regulators in public policy saying you can't move the data out of the country. And you have to prove to me that you have a chain of custody. That when you say you deleted something, you have to show me that you not only deleted the file, then the data, but also the metadata. That's a really hard problem. So to my point, something that Palo Alto might be able to solve. >> It might be. It'll be an interesting conversation with Unit 42. And like we said, we have a great lineup of guests today and tomorrow with you, so stick around. Lisa Martin and Dave Vellante are covering Palo Alto Networks Ignite 22 for you. We look forward to seeing you in our next segment. Stick around. (light music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Palo Alto Networks. from the MGM Grand in beautiful Las Vegas. Because at the time, you about the ecosystem with Nikesh. and he cut out of the conference early, You know, one of the things and the way you secure your from running in the Microsoft cloud. What are some of the things of being the consolidator. And really moved the needle forward it's pretty much the and some of the announcements We look forward to seeing
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2005 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fortinet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wendy Whitmore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hassan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Palo Alto Network | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
7 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
93% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
44% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kevin Mandia | PERSON | 0.99+ |
71% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
22% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
180 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
14 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
150 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
41% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
36% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Cortex | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Nir Zuk | PERSON | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two weeks ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
50 tools | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.97+ |
Nikesh Arora | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Breaking Analysis: How Palo Alto Networks Became the Gold Standard of Cybersecurity
>> From "theCube" Studios in Palo Alto in Boston bringing you data-driven insights from "theCube" and ETR. This is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> As an independent pure play company, Palo Alto Networks has earned its status as the leader in security. You can measure this in a variety of ways. Revenue, market cap, execution, ethos, and most importantly, conversations with customers generally. In CISO specifically, who consistently affirm this position. The company's on track to double its revenues in fiscal year 23 relative to fiscal year 2020. Despite macro headwinds, which are likely to carry through next year, Palo Alto owes its position to a clarity of vision and strong execution on a TAM expansion strategy through acquisitions and integration into its cloud and SaaS offerings. Hello and welcome to this week's "Wikibon Cube Insights" powered by ETR and this breaking analysis and ahead of Palo Alto Ignite the company's user conference, we bring you the next chapter on top of the last week's cybersecurity update. We're going to dig into the ETR data on Palo Alto Networks as we promised and provide a glimpse of what we're going to look for at "Ignite" and posit what Palo Alto needs to do to stay on top of the hill. Now, the challenges for cybersecurity professionals. Dead simple to understand. Solving it, not so much. This is a taxonomic eye test, if you will, from Optiv. It's one of our favorite artifacts to make the point the cybersecurity landscape is a mosaic of stovepipes. Security professionals have to work with dozens of tools many legacy combined with shiny new toys to try and keep up with the relentless pace of innovation catalyzed by the incredibly capable well-funded and motivated adversaries. Cybersecurity is an anomalous market in that the leaders have low single digit market shares. Think about that. Cisco at one point held 60% market share in the networking business and it's still deep into the 40s. Oracle captures around 30% of database market revenue. EMC and storage at its peak had more than 30% of that market. Even Dell's PC market shares, you know, in the mid 20s or even over that from a revenue standpoint. So cybersecurity from a market share standpoint is even more fragmented perhaps than the software industry. Okay, you get the point. So despite its position as the number one player Palo Alto might have maybe three maybe 4% of the total market, depending on what you use as your denominator, but just a tiny slice. So how is it that we can sit here and declare Palo Alto as the undisputed leader? Well, we probably wouldn't go that far. They probably have quite a bit of competition. But this CISO from a recent ETR round table discussion with our friend Eric Bradley, summed up Palo Alto's allure. We thought pretty well. The question was why Palo Alto Networks? Here's the answer. Because of its completeness as a platform, its ability to integrate with its own products or they acquire, integrate then rebrand them as their own. We've looked at other vendors we just didn't think they were as mature and we already had implemented some of the Palo Alto tools like the firewalls and stuff and we thought why not go holistically with the vendor a single throat to choke, if you will, if stuff goes wrong. And I think that was probably the primary driver and familiarity with the tools and the resources that they provided. Now here's another stat from ETR's Eric Bradley. He gave us a glimpse of the January survey that's in the field now. The percent of IT buyers stating that they plan to consolidate redundant vendors, it went from 34% in the October survey and now stands at 44%. So we fo we feel this bodes well for consolidators like Palo Alto networks. And the same is true from Microsoft's kind of good enough approach. It should also be true for CrowdStrike although last quarter we saw softness reported on in their SMB market, whereas interestingly MongoDB actually saw consistent strength from its SMB and its self-serve. So that's something that we're watching very closely. Now, Palo Alto Networks has held up better than most of its peers in the stock market. So let's take a look at that real quick. This chart gives you a sense of how well. It's a one year comparison of Palo Alto with the bug ETF. That's the cyber basket that we like to compare often CrowdStrike, Zscaler, and Okta. Now remember Palo Alto, they didn't run up as much as CrowdStrike, ZS and Okta during the pandemic but you can see it's now down unquote only 9% for the year. Whereas the cyber basket ETF is off 27% roughly in line with the NASDAQ. We're not showing that CrowdStrike down 44%, Zscaler down 61% and Okta off a whopping 72% in the past 12 months. Now as we've indicated, Palo Alto is making a strong case for consolidating point tools and we think it will have a much harder time getting customers to switch off of big platforms like Cisco who's another leader in network security. But based on the fragmentation in the market there's plenty of room to grow in our view. We asked breaking analysis contributor Chip Simington for his take on the technicals of the stock and he said that despite Palo Alto's leadership position it doesn't seem to make much difference these days. It's all about interest rates. And even though this name has performed better than its peers, it looks like the stock wants to keep testing its 52 week lows, but he thinks Palo Alto got oversold during the last big selloff. And the fact that the company's free cash flow is so strong probably keeps it at the one 50 level or above maybe bouncing around there for a while. If it breaks through that under to the downside it's ne next test is at that low of around one 40 level. So thanks for that, Chip. Now having get that out of the way as we said on the previous chart Palo Alto has strong opinions, it's founder and CTO, Nir Zuk, is extremely clear on that point of view. So let's take a look at how Palo Alto got to where it is today and how we think you should think about his future. The company was founded around 18 years ago as a network security company focused on what they called NextGen firewalls. Now, what Palo Alto did was different. They didn't try to stuff a bunch of functionality inside of a hardware box. Rather they layered network security functions on top of its firewalls and delivered value as a service through software running at the time in its own cloud. So pretty obvious today, but forward thinking for the time and now they've moved to a more true cloud native platform and much more activity in the public cloud. In February, 2020, right before the pandemic we reported on the divergence in market values between Palo Alto and Fort Net and we cited some challenges that Palo Alto was happening having transitioning to a cloud native model. And at the time we said we were confident that Palo Alto would make it through the knot hole. And you could see from the previous chart that it has. So the company's architectural approach was to do the heavy lifting in the cloud. And this eliminates the need for customers to deploy sensors on prem or proxies on prem or sandboxes on prem sandboxes, you know for instance are vulnerable to overwhelming attacks. Think about it, if you're a sandbox is on prem you're not going to be updating that every day. No way. You're probably not going to updated even every week or every month. And if the capacity of your sandbox is let's say 20,000 files an hour you know a hacker's just going to turn up the volume, it'll overwhelm you. They'll send a hundred thousand emails attachments into your sandbox and they'll choke you out and then they'll have the run of the house while you're trying to recover. Now the cloud doesn't completely prevent that but what it does, it definitely increases the hacker's cost. So they're going to probably hit some easier targets and that's kind of the objective of security firms. You know, increase the denominator on the ROI. All right, the next thing that Palo Alto did is start acquiring aggressively, I think we counted 17 or 18 acquisitions to expand the TAM beyond network security into endpoint CASB, PaaS security, IaaS security, container security, serverless security, incident response, SD WAN, CICD pipeline security, attack service management, supply chain security. Just recently with the acquisition of Cider Security and Palo Alto by all accounts takes the time to integrate into its cloud and SaaS platform called Prisma. Unlike many acquisitive companies in the past EMC was a really good example where you ended up with a kind of a Franken portfolio. Now all this leads us to believe that Palo Alto wants to be the consolidator and is in a good position to do so. But beyond that, as multi-cloud becomes more prevalent and more of a strategy customers tell us they want a consistent experience across clouds. And is going to be the same by the way with IoT. So of the next wave here. Customers don't want another stove pipe. So we think Palo Alto is in a good position to build what we call the security super cloud that layer above the clouds that brings a common experience for devs and operational teams. So of course the obvious question is this, can Palo Alto networks continue on this path of acquire and integrate and still maintain best of breed status? Can it? Will it? Does it even have to? As Holger Mueller of Constellation Research and I talk about all the time integrated suites seem to always beat best of breed in the long run. We'll come back to that. Now, this next graphic that we're going to show you underscores this question about portfolio. Here's a picture and I don't expect you to digest it all but it's a screen grab of Palo Alto's product and solutions portfolios, network cloud, network security rather, cloud security, Sassy, CNAP, endpoint unit 42 which is their threat intelligence platform and every imaginable security service and solution for customers. Well, maybe not every, I'm sure there's more to come like supply chain with the recent Cider acquisition and maybe more IoT beyond ZingBox and earlier acquisition but we're sure there will be more in the future both organic and inorganic. Okay, let's bring in more of the ETR survey data. For those of you who don't know ETR, they are the number one enterprise data platform surveying thousands of end customers every quarter with additional drill down surveys and customer round tables just an awesome SaaS enabled platform. And here's a view that shows net score or spending momentum on the vertical axis in provision or presence within the ETR data set on the horizontal axis. You see that red dotted line at 40%. Anything at or over that indicates a highly elevated net score. And as you can see Palo Alto is right on that line just under. And I'll give you another glimpse it looks like Palo Alto despite the macro may even just edge up a bit in the next survey based on the glimpse that Eric gave us. Now those colored bars in the bottom right corner they show the breakdown of Palo Alto's net score and underscore the methodology that ETR uses. The lime green is new customer adoptions, that's 7%. The forest green at 38% represents the percent of customers that are spending 6% or more on Palo Alto solutions. The gray is at that 40 or 8% that's flat spending plus or minus 5%. The pinkish at 5% is spending is down on Palo Alto network products by 6% or worse. And the bright red at only 2% is churn or defections. Very low single digit numbers for Palo Alto, that's a real positive. What you do is you subtract the red from the green and you get a net score of 38% which is very good for a company of Palo Alto size. And we'll note this is based on just under 400 responses in the ETR survey that are Palo Alto customers out of around 1300 in the total survey. It's a really good representation of Palo Alto. And you can see the other leading companies like CrowdStrike, Okta, Zscaler, Forte, Cisco they loom large with similar aspirations. Well maybe not so much Okta. They don't necessarily rule want to rule the world. They want to rule identity and of course the ever ubiquitous Microsoft in the upper right. Now drilling deeper into the ETR data, let's look at how Palo Alto has progressed over the last three surveys in terms of market presence in the survey. This view of the data shows provision in the data going back to October, 2021, that's the gray bars. The blue is July 22 and the yellow is the latest survey from October, 2022. Remember, the January survey is currently in the field. Now the leftmost set of data there show size a company. The middle set of data shows the industry for a select number of industries in the right most shows, geographic region. Notice anything, yes, Palo Alto up across the board relative to both this past summer and last fall. So that's pretty impressive. Palo Alto network CEO, Nikesh Aurora, stressed on the last earnings call that the company is seeing somewhat elongated deal approvals and sometimes splitting up size of deals. He's stressed that certain industries like energy, government and financial services continue to spend. But we would expect even a pullback there as companies get more conservative. But the point is that Nikesh talked about how they're hiring more sales pros to work the pipeline because they understand that they have to work harder to pull deals forward 'cause they got to get more approvals and they got to increase the volume that's coming through the pipeline to account for the possibility that certain companies are going to split up the deals, you know, large deals they want to split into to smaller bite size chunks. So they're really going hard after they go to market expansion to account for that. All right, so we're going to wrap by sharing what we expect and what we're going to probe for at Palo Alto Ignite next week, Lisa Martin and I will be hosting "theCube" and here's what we'll be looking for. First, it's a four day event at the MGM with the meat of the program on days two and three. That's day two was the big keynote. That's when we'll start our broadcasting, we're going for two days. Now our understanding is we've never done Palo Alto Ignite before but our understanding it's a pretty technically oriented crowd that's going to be eager to hear what CTO and founder Nir Zuk has to say. And as well CEO Nikesh Aurora and as in addition to longtime friend of "theCube" and current president, BJ Jenkins, he's going to be speaking. Wendy Whitmore runs Unit 42 and is going to be several other high profile Palo Alto execs, as well, Thomas Kurian from Google is a featured speaker. Lee Claridge, who is Palo Alto's, chief product officer we think is going to be giving the audience heavy doses of Prisma Cloud and Cortex enhancements. Now, Cortex, you might remember, came from an acquisition and does threat detection and attack surface management. And we're going to hear a lot about we think about security automation. So we'll be listening for how Cortex has been integrated and what kind of uptake that it's getting. We've done some, you know, modeling in from the ETR. Guys have done some modeling of cortex, you know looks like it's got a lot of upside and through the Palo Alto go to market machine, you know could really pick up momentum. That's something that we'll be probing for. Now, one of the other things that we'll be watching is pricing. We want to talk to customers about their spend optimization, their spending patterns, their vendor consolidation strategies. Look, Palo Alto is a premium offering. It charges for value. It's expensive. So we also want to understand what kind of switching costs are customers willing to absorb and how onerous they are and what's the business case look like? How are they thinking about that business case. We also want to understand and really probe on how will Palo Alto maintain best of breed as it continues to acquire and integrate to expand its TAM and appeal as that one-stop shop. You know, can it do that as we talked about before. And will it do that? There's also an interesting tension going on sort of changing subjects here in security. There's a guy named Edward Hellekey who's been in "theCube" before. He hasn't been in "theCube" in a while but he's a security pro who has educated us on the nuances of protecting data privacy, public policy, how it varies by region and how complicated it is relative to security. Because securities you technically you have to show a chain of custody that proves unequivocally, for example that data has been deleted or scrubbed or that metadata does. It doesn't include any residual private data that violates the laws, the local laws. And the tension is this, you need good data and lots of it to have good security, really the more the better. But government policy is often at odds in a major blocker to sharing data and it's getting more so. So we want to understand this tension and how companies like Palo Alto are dealing with it. Our customers testing public policy in courts we think not quite yet, our government's making exceptions and policies like GDPR that favor security over data privacy. What are the trade-offs there? And finally, one theme of this breaking analysis is what does Palo Alto have to do to stay on top? And we would sum it up with three words. Ecosystem, ecosystem, ecosystem. And we said this at CrowdStrike Falcon in September that the one concern we had was the pace of ecosystem development for CrowdStrike. Is collaboration possible with competitors? Is being adopted aggressively? Is Palo Alto being adopted aggressively by global system integrators? What's the uptake there? What about developers? Look, the hallmark of a cloud company which Palo Alto is a cloud security company is a thriving ecosystem that has entries into and exits from its platform. So we'll be looking at what that ecosystem looks like how vibrant and inclusive it is where the public clouds fit and whether Palo Alto Networks can really become the security super cloud. Okay, that's a wrap stop by next week. If you're in Vegas, say hello to "theCube" team. We have an unbelievable lineup on the program. Now if you're not there, check out our coverage on theCube.net. I want to thank Eric Bradley for sharing a glimpse on short notice of the upcoming survey from ETR and his thoughts. And as always, thanks to Chip Symington for his sharp comments. Want to thank Alex Morrison, who's on production and manages the podcast Ken Schiffman as well in our Boston studio, Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight they help get the word out on social and of course in our newsletters, Rob Hoof, is our editor in chief over at Silicon Angle who does some awesome editing, thank you to all. Remember all these episodes they're available as podcasts. Wherever you listen, all you got to do is search "Breaking Analysis" podcasts. I publish each week on wikibon.com and silicon angle.com where you can email me at david.valante@siliconangle.com or dm me at D Valante or comment on our LinkedIn post. And please do check out etr.ai. They've got the best survey data in the enterprise tech business. This is Dave Valante for "theCube" Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next week on "Ignite" or next time on "Breaking Analysis". (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
bringing you data-driven and of course the ever
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Morrison | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Edward Hellekey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Thomas Kurian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lee Claridge | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Hoof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
17 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
October, 2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
February, 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
October, 2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
40 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Wendy Whitmore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
January | DATE | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Forte | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chip Simington | PERSON | 0.99+ |
52 week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
BJ Jenkins | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July 22 | DATE | 0.99+ |
6% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
34% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chip Symington | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kristen Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
7% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
27% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
44% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
61% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
38% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nir Zuk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
72% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Constellation Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cider Security | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
four day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fiscal year 23 | DATE | 0.99+ |
8% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
david.valante@siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Fort Net | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
last fall | DATE | 0.99+ |
NASDAQ | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
fiscal year 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than 30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three words | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Franken | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: Cyber Firms Revert to the Mean
(upbeat music) >> From theCube Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data driven insights from theCube and ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> While by no means a safe haven, the cybersecurity sector has outpaced the broader tech market by a meaningful margin, that is up until very recently. Cybersecurity remains the number one technology priority for the C-suite, but as we've previously reported the CISO's budget has constraints just like other technology investments. Recent trends show that economic headwinds have elongated sales cycles, pushed deals into future quarters, and just like other tech initiatives, are pacing cybersecurity investments and breaking them into smaller chunks. Hello and welcome to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis we explain how cybersecurity trends are reverting to the mean and tracking more closely with other technology investments. We'll make a couple of valuation comparisons to show the magnitude of the challenge and which cyber firms are feeling the heat, which aren't. There are some exceptions. We'll then show the latest survey data from ETR to quantify the contraction in spending momentum and close with a glimpse of the landscape of emerging cybersecurity companies, the private companies that could be ripe for acquisition, consolidation, or disruptive to the broader market. First, let's take a look at the recent patterns for cyber stocks relative to the broader tech market as a benchmark, as an indicator. Here's a year to date comparison of the bug ETF, which comprises a basket of cyber security names, and we compare that with the tech heavy NASDAQ composite. Notice that on April 13th of this year the cyber ETF was actually in positive territory while the NAS was down nearly 14%. Now by August 16th, the green turned red for cyber stocks but they still meaningfully outpaced the broader tech market by more than 950 basis points as of December 2nd that Delta had contracted. As you can see, the cyber ETF is now down nearly 25%, year to date, while the NASDAQ is down 27% and change. Now take a look at just how far a few of the high profile cybersecurity names have fallen. Here are six security firms that we've been tracking closely since before the pandemic. We've been, you know, tracking dozens but let's just take a look at this data and the subset. We show for comparison the S&P 500 and the NASDAQ, again, just for reference, they're both up since right before the pandemic. They're up relative to right before the pandemic, and then during the pandemic the S&P shot up more than 40%, relative to its pre pandemic level, around February is what we're using for the pre pandemic level, and the NASDAQ peaked at around 65% higher than that February level. They're now down 85% and 71% of their previous. So they're at 85% and 71% respectively from their pandemic highs. You compare that to these six companies, Splunk, which was and still is working through a transition is well below its pre pandemic market value and 44, it's 44% of its pre pandemic high as of last Friday. Palo Alto Networks is the most interesting here, in that it had been facing challenges prior to the pandemic related to a pivot to the Cloud which we reported on at the time. But as we said at that time we believe the company would sort out its Cloud transition, and its go to market challenges, and sales compensation issues, which it did as you can see. And its valuation jumped from 24 billion prior to Covid to 56 billion, and it's holding 93% of its peak value. Its revenue run rate is now over 6 billion with a healthy growth rate of 24% expected for the next quarter. Similarly, Fortinet has done relatively well holding 71% of its peak Covid value, with a healthy 34% revenue guide for the coming quarter. Now, Okta has been the biggest disappointment, a darling of the pandemic Okta's communication snafu, with what was actually a pretty benign hack combined with difficulty absorbing its 7 billion off zero acquisition, knocked the company off track. Its valuation has dropped by 35 billion since its peak during the pandemic, and that's after a nice beat and bounce back quarter just announced by Okta. Now, in our view Okta remains a viable long-term leader in identity. However, its recent fiscal 24 revenue guide was exceedingly conservative at around 16% growth. So either the company is sandbagging, or has such poor visibility that it wants to be like super cautious or maybe it's actually seeing a dramatic slowdown in its business momentum. After all, this is a company that not long ago was putting up 50% plus revenue growth rates. So it's one that bears close watching. CrowdStrike is another big name that we've been talking about on Breaking Analysis for quite some time. It like Okta has led the industry in a key ETR performance indicator that measures customer spending momentum. Just last week, CrowdStrike announced revenue increased more than 50% but new ARR was soft and the company guided conservatively. Not surprisingly, the stock got absolutely crushed as CrowdStrike blamed tepid demand from smaller and midsize firms. Many analysts believe that competition from Microsoft was one factor along with cautious spending amongst those midsize and smaller customers. Notably, large customers remain active. So we'll see if this is a longer term trend or an anomaly. Zscaler is another company in the space that we've reported having great customer spending momentum from the ETR data. But even though the company beat expectations for its recent quarter, like other companies its Outlook was conservative. So other than Palo Alto, and to a lesser extent Fortinet, these companies and others that we're not showing here are feeling the economic pinch and it shows in the compression of value. CrowdStrike, for example, had a 70 billion valuation at one point during the pandemic Zscaler top 50 billion, Okta 45 billion. Now, having said that Palo Alto Networks, Fortinet, CrowdStrike, and Zscaler are all still trading well above their pre pandemic levels that we tracked back in February of 2020. All right, let's go now back to ETR'S January survey and take a look at how much things have changed since the beginning of the year. Remember, this is obviously pre Ukraine, and pre all the concerns about the economic headwinds but here's an X Y graph that shows a net score, or spending momentum on the y-axis, and market presence on the x-axis. The red dotted line at 40% on the vertical indicates a highly elevated net score. Anything above that we think is, you know, super elevated. Now, we filtered the data here to show only those companies with more than 50 responses in the ETR survey. Still really crowded. Note that there were around 20 companies above that red 40% mark, which is a very, you know, high number. It's a, it's a crowded market, but lots of companies with, you know, positive momentum. Now let's jump ahead to the most recent October survey and take a look at what, what's happening. Same graphic plotting, spending momentum, and market presence, and look at the number of companies above that red line and how it's been squashed. It's really compressing, it's still a crowded market, it's still, you know, plenty of green, but the number of companies above 40% that, that key mark has gone from around 20 firms down to about five or six. And it speaks to that compression and IT spending, and of course the elongated sales cycles pushing deals out, taking them in smaller chunks. I can't tell you how many conversations with customers I had, at last week at Reinvent underscoring this exact same trend. The buyers are getting pressure from their CFOs to slow things down, do more with less and, and, and prioritize projects to those that absolutely are critical to driving revenue or cutting costs. And that's rippling through all sectors, including cyber. Now, let's do a bit more playing around with the ETR data and take a look at those companies with more than a hundred citations in the survey this quarter. So N, greater than or equal to a hundred. Now remember the followers of Breaking Analysis know that each quarter we take a look at those, what we call four star security firms. That is, those are the, that are in, that hit the top 10 for both spending momentum, net score, and the N, the mentions in the survey, the presence, the pervasiveness in the survey, and that's what we show here. The left most chart is sorted by spending momentum or net score, and the right hand chart by shared N, or the number of mentions in the survey, that pervasiveness metric. that solid red line denotes the cutoff point at the top 10. And you'll note we've actually cut it off at 11 to account for Auth 0, which is now part of Okta, and is going through a go to market transition, you know, with the company, they're kind of restructuring sales so they can take advantage of that. So starting on the left with spending momentum, again, net score, Microsoft leads all vendors, typical Microsoft, very prominent, although it hadn't always done so, it, for a while, CrowdStrike and Okta were, were taking the top spot, now it's Microsoft. CrowdStrike, still always near the top, but note that CyberArk and Cloudflare have cracked the top five in Okta, which as I just said was consistently at the top, has dropped well off its previous highs. You'll notice that Palo Alto Network Palo Alto Networks with a 38% net score, just below that magic 40% number, is healthy, especially as you look over to the right hand chart. Take a look at Palo Alto with an N of 395. It is the largest of the independent pure play security firms, and has a very healthy net score, although one caution is that net score has dropped considerably since the beginning of the year, which is the case for most of the top 10 names. The only exception is Fortinet, they're the only ones that saw an increase since January in spending momentum as ETR measures it. Now this brings us to the four star security firms, that is those that hit the top 10 in both net score on the left hand side and market presence on the right hand side. So it's Microsoft, Palo Alto, CrowdStrike, Okta, still there even not accounting for a Auth 0, just Okta on its own. If you put in Auth 0, it's, it's even stronger. Adding then in Fortinet and Zscaler. So Microsoft, Palo Alto, CrowdStrike, Okta, Fortinet, and Zscaler. And as we've mentioned since January, only Fortinet has shown an increase in net score since, since that time, again, since the January survey. Now again, this talks to the compression in spending. Now one of the big themes we hear constantly in cybersecurity is the market is overcrowded. Everybody talks about that, me included. The implication there, is there's a lot of room for consolidation and that consolidation can come in the form of M&A, or it can come in the form of people consolidating onto a single platform, and retiring some other vendors, and getting rid of duplicate vendors. We're hearing that as a big theme as well. Now, as we saw in the previous, previous chart, this is a very crowded market and we've seen lots of consolidation in 2022, in the form of M&A. Literally hundreds of M&A deals, with some of the largest companies going private. SailPoint, KnowBe4, Barracuda, Mandiant, Fedora, these are multi billion dollar acquisitions, or at least billion dollars and up, and many of them multi-billion, for these companies, and hundreds more acquisitions in the cyberspace, now less you think the pond is overfished, here's a chart from ETR of emerging tech companies in the cyber security industry. This data comes from ETR's Emerging Technologies Survey, ETS, which is this diamond in a rough that I found a couple quarters ago, and it's ripe with companies that are candidates for M&A. Many would've liked, many of these companies would've liked to, gotten to the public markets during the pandemic, but they, you know, couldn't get there. They weren't ready. So the graph, you know, similar to the previous one, but different, it shows net sentiment on the vertical axis and that's a measurement of, of, of intent to adopt against a mind share on the X axis, which measures, measures the awareness of the vendor in the community. So this is specifically a survey that ETR goes out and, and, and fields only to track those emerging tech companies that are private companies. Now, some of the standouts in Mindshare, are OneTrust, BeyondTrust, Tanium and Endpoint, Net Scope, which we've talked about in previous Breaking Analysis. 1Password, which has been acquisitive on its own. In identity, the managed security service provider, Arctic Wolf Network, a company we've also covered, we've had their CEO on. We've talked about MSSPs as a real trend, particularly in small and medium sized business, we'll come back to that, Sneek, you know, kind of high flyer in both app security and containers, and you can just see the number of companies in the space this huge and it just keeps growing. Now, just to make it a bit easier on the eyes we filtered the data on these companies with with those, and isolated on those with more than a hundred responses only within the survey. And that's what we show here. Some of the names that we just mentioned are a bit easier to see, but these are the ones that really stand out in ERT, ETS, survey of private companies, OneTrust, BeyondTrust, Taniam, Netscope, which is in Cloud, 1Password, Arctic Wolf, Sneek, BitSight, SecurityScorecard, HackerOne, Code42, and Exabeam, and Sim. All of these hit the ETS survey with more than a hundred responses by, by the IT practitioners. Okay, so these firms, you know, maybe they do some M&A on their own. We've seen that with Sneek, as I said, with 1Password has been inquisitive, as have others. Now these companies with the larger footprint, these private companies, will likely be candidate for both buying companies and eventually going public when the markets settle down a bit. So again, no shortage of players to affect consolidation, both buyers and sellers. Okay, so let's finish with some key questions that we're watching. CrowdStrike in particular on its earnings calls cited softness from smaller buyers. Is that because these smaller buyers have stopped adopting? If so, are they more at risk, or are they tactically moving toward the easy button, aka, Microsoft's good enough approach. What does that mean for the market if smaller company cohorts continue to soften? How about MSSPs? Will companies continue to outsource, or pause on on that, as well as try to free up, to try to free up some budget? Adam Celiski at Reinvent last week said, "If you want to save money the Cloud's the best place to do it." Is the cloud the best place to save money in cyber? Well, it would seem that way from the standpoint of controlling budgets with lots of, lots of optionality. You could dial up and dial down services, you know, or does the Cloud add another layer of complexity that has to be understood and managed by Devs, for example? Now, consolidation should favor the likes of Palo Alto and CrowdStrike, cause they're platform players, and some of the larger players as well, like Cisco, how about IBM and of course Microsoft. Will that happen? And how will economic uncertainty impact the risk equation, a particular concern is increase of tax on vulnerable sectors of the population, like the elderly. How will companies and governments protect them from scams? And finally, how many cybersecurity companies can actually remain independent in the slingshot economy? In so many ways the market is still strong, it's just that expectations got ahead of themselves, and now as earnings forecast come, come, come down and come down to earth, it's going to basically come down to who can execute, generate cash, and keep enough runway to get through the knothole. And the one certainty is nobody really knows how tight that knothole really is. All right, let's call it a wrap. Next week we dive deeper into Palo Alto Networks, and take a look at how and why that company has held up so well and what to expect at Ignite, Palo Alto's big user conference coming up later this month in Las Vegas. We'll be there with theCube. Okay, many thanks to Alex Myerson on production and manages the podcast, Ken Schiffman as well, as our newest edition to our Boston studio. Great to have you Ken. Kristin Martin and Cheryl Knight help get the word out on social media and in our newsletters. And Rob Hof is our EIC over at Silicon Angle. He does some great editing for us. Thank you to all. Remember these episodes are all available as podcasts. Wherever you listen, just search Breaking Analysis podcast. I publish each week on wikibond.com and siliconangle.com, or you can email me directly David.vellante@siliconangle.com or DM me @DVellante, or comment on our LinkedIn posts. Please do checkout etr.ai, they got the best survey data in the enterprise tech business. This is Dave Vellante for theCube Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, and we'll see you next time on Breaking Analysis. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
with Dave Vellante. and of course the elongated
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
December 2nd | DATE | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Delta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fortinet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam Celiski | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
August 16th | DATE | 0.99+ |
April 13th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rob Hof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NASDAQ | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
93% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kristin Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Arctic Wolf Network | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
38% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
71% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
January | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
February of 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
7 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Barracuda | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
34% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
February | DATE | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
last Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
SailPoint | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than 50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
85% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
44% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
35 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
70 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ken | PERSON | 0.99+ |
KnowBe4 | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
27% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
56 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netscope | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
Next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
one factor | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
44 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
dozens | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
BeyondTrust | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David.vellante@siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
24 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Anant Adya, & David Wilson, Infosys | AWS re:Invent 2022
(bright, upbeat music playing) >> Hello, Brilliant Cloud community and welcome back to AWS re:Invent, where we are live all day everyday from the show floor, here in Las Vegas, Nevada. I'm Savannah Peterson joined by my beautiful co-host, Lisa Martin here on theCUBE. Lisa, you're smiling, you're radiating, day three, you would think it was day one. How you doing? >> Amazing. I can't believe the energy that has been maintained >> It's been a theme. on this show floor, since Monday night at 4:00 pm. >> I know, and I kind of thought today we might see some folks trickling out. It is packed, as our guests and I were, we were all just talking about, right before the segment, almost too packed which is a really great sign for AWS. >> It is. We're hearing north of 55,000 people here. And of course, we only get a little snapshot of what's at the Venetian. >> Literally this corner, yeah. We don't get to see anything else around The Strip, that's going on, so it's massive. >> Yeah, it is very massive. I'm super excited. We've got two guests from Infosys with us on this last segment from this stage today. David and Anant, welcome to the show. How you doing? >> Awesome. >> You're both smiling and I am really excited. We have our first prop of the show, (David and Anant laughing) and it's a pretty flashy, sexy prop. Anant, what's going on here? >> Oh, so this is something that we are very proud of. Last year we won one award, which was very special for us because it was our first award with AWS, and that was, "The Industry Partner of The Year Award." And on the back of that, this year we won three awards and this is super awesome for us, because all of them are very special. One was in collaboration, second was in design, and third was in sustainability. So we are very proud, and we thank AWS, and it's a fantastic partnership. >> Yeah, congratulations. >> Anant: Yes. I mean that's huge. >> Yes, it's absolutely huge. And the second one is, we are the Launch Partner for MSK, which again is a very proud thing for us. So I think those are the two things that we wanted to talk about. >> How many awards are you going to win next year then? (all laughing) >> We want to target more than three. (Savannah chuckles) >> Keep it going up. >> Probably five, right? >> So it's the odd numbers, one, three, five, seven, ten. Yeah. Yeah. Yeah. >> Savannah: There you go. >> I think we got that question last year and we said we'd get two, and we ended up over-delivering with three, so who knows? >> Hey, nothing wrong with setting the bar low and clearing it. And I mean, not setting it low, setting it with one and clearing it with three is pretty fantastic. We talk about it as an ego thing sometimes with awards and it feels great for internal culture, but David, what does it mean on the partnership side to win awards like that? >> So what's really important for us with our partners is to make sure that we're achieving their goals, and when their goals are achieved in our partnership it's just the byproduct that we're achieving our own with our clients. The awards are a great representation of that to see, you know, again, being recognized in three different categories really shows that we've had success with AWS, and in turn, you know, Anant and I can attest to it. We've been very successful at the partnership on our side. >> Yeah, and I bet it's really exciting for the team. Just speaking for Energy (indistinct) >> And there's celebration, you know, there's been a few cocktails being raised... >> Has there? In Las Vegas? >> David: I know. Cocktails? >> Lisa Martin: Shocking! I'm shocked! >> Lisa Martin: I know! (all laughing) I wouldn't mind one right now to be really, really honest. Let's dig into the product a little bit. Infosys Cobalt. What's the scoop, Anant? >> Yeah, so first of all, we were the first ones to actually launch a Cloud brand called Cobalt, right? We were the first ones in the world. In fact, one of our competitor followed us soon after. So essentially what we did was we brought all our Cloud offerings into one brand called Cobalt. It becomes very clear to our customers on what our proposition is. It is very consistent to the market in terms of what our narrative is. And it's a little easy for our customers to understand what we bring to the table. So Cobalt is not one product or what one platform it's a set of services, solutions and platforms that we bring to accelerate customer's journey where they're leveraging Cloud. So that's what Cobalt is. >> Awesome, everyone wants to do everything faster. >> Yes. >> Lisa Martin: Yeah. >> And the booth was packed. I walked by earlier, it was absolutely buzzing. >> Yes. >> Yeah. Nobody wants to do, you know, wants less data slower. >> Anant: Yes. (Savannah laughs) >> It's always more faster. >> Anant: More faster. And we're living in this explosion unlike anything this swarm of data unlike anything that we've ever seen before. Every company, regardless of industry has to be a data company. >> Anant: Yes. But they have to be able to work with the right partners to extract, to first of all harness all that data, extract insights in real time, because of course on the consumer side we're not patient anymore. >> Anant: Yes. We expect a personalized, realtime, custom experience. >> Anant: Absolutely. >> How do you work with AWS to help deliver that and how do the partners help deliver that as well? >> Well I'll start with on the partner side of it. You walk through the hallways here or down the aisles you see partners like MongoDB, Snowflake, Databricks and such, they're all attesting their commitment and their strong partnership with AWS, and coincidentally they're also very good partners of our own. And as a result... >> Savannah: One big happy family here at AWS when you met. >> And this is something that I'm calling, coining the phrase sub-ecosystems. These are partnerships where one is successful with each other, and then the three come together, and we go together with an integrated solution. And it's really taking off. It's something that's really powerful. The fun thing about re:Invent here is isn't just that we're having amazing discussions with our clients and AWS, but we're also having with the other partners here about how we can all work together so... And data analytics is a big one, security is another hot one-- >> Lisa Martin: Security is huge. >> Savannah: Yeah. Cost optimization from the start. >> Absolutely. And Ruba was saying this, right? Ruba said, like she was giving example of a marathoner. Marathon is not a single man or a single woman sport, right? So similarly Cloud journey is a team's, sort of you know, team journey, so that's why partners play a big role in that and that's exactly what we are trying to do. >> So you guys get to see a lot of different companies across a lot of different industries. We're living in very interesting times, how do you see the Cloud evolving? >> Oh, yeah. So what we did when we launched Cobalt in 2020 we have now evolved our story. We call it Cobalt 2.0. And essentially what we wanted to do was to focus on industry Clouds. So it's not just about taking a workload and moving it from point A to point B or moving data to Cloud or getting out of data centers, but it's also being very specific to the industry that this specific customer belongs to, right? So for example, if we go to banking they would say we want to better our security posture. If we go to a retailer they want to basically have smart stores. If we go to a manufacturing customer they want to have a smart factory. So we want to make sure that there are specific industry blueprints and specific reference architectures that we bring and start delivering outcomes. So we call it something called... >> Savannah: I know you're hot on business outcomes. >> Yes. >> Savannah: Yes. So we call it something called the link of life forces. So there are six technologies; Cloud, Data, Edge, IOT, 5G, and AI. They will come together to deliver business outcomes. So that's where we are heading with Cobalt 2.0, And that's essentially what we want to do with our customers. >> Savannah: It's a lot to think about. >> Yes. >> David: Yes. >> And, yeah, go for it David. >> I was just saying from a partnering perspective, you know prior to Cloud, we were talking about transactional type businesses where if you ask a technology company who their partner is its generally a reseller where they're just basically taking one product and selling it to their client. What's happened with cloud now it's not about the transaction upfront it's about the actual, you know, the consumption of the technology and the bringing together all of these to form an outcome, it changes the model dramatically, and quite honestly, the global system integrators like Infosys are in great position because we can pull that together to the benefit of our partners, put our own secret sauce around it and take these solutions to market and drive consumption because that's what the Cloud's all about. >> Right. Well, how are you helping customers really treat Cloud as a strategic focus? You know we often hear companies talk about we're Cloud first. Well not everything belongs in the Cloud. So then we hear companies start talking about being Cloud smart. >> Anant: Yes. How are you helping, and so we'll go with that. How are you helping enterprises really become Cloud smart and where is the partner angle? So we'll start with you and then we'll bring the partner angle in. >> Oh yeah, big time. I think one of the things that we have been educating our customers is Cloud is not about cost takeout. So Cloud is about innovation, Cloud is about growth. And I'll give two examples. One of the beauty products companies they wanted to set up their shop in US and they said that, you know, "we don't have time to basically buy the infrastructure, implement an ERP platform, and you know, or roll it out, test it and go into production. We don't have so much time. Time to market is very important for us." And they embarked on the Cloud journey. So expanding into new market, Cloud can play a big role. That is one of the ways to expand and you know, grow your business. Similarly, there is another company that they wanted to go into retail banking, right? And they didn't have years to launch a product. So they actually use AWS and it's a joint Infosys and AWS customer. A pretty big bank. They launched retail banking and they did it in less than six months. So I think these are some of the examples of cloud not being cost takeout but it's about innovation and growth. So that's what we are trying to tell customers. >> Savannah: Big impacts. >> Big impact. Yes, absolutely. >> And that's where the Cobalt assets come into play as well. You know, as Anant mentioned, we have literally thousands of these industries specific and they're derived in a lot of cases in partnership with the companies you see down the aisles here, and AWS. And it accelerates the deployments and ensures a successful adoption, more so than before. You know, we have clients that are coming to us now that used to buy, run their own procurement. You know they would have... Literally there was one bank that came to us with a over a hundred products >> The amount of work. I'm just seeing it... >> A list of a hundred products. Some they bought directly from a vendor, some they went through a distributor, some they went through a reseller and such, >> Savannah: It's so ad-hoc. And they're looking at this in a completely different way and they're looking to rationalize those technologies, again, look for companies that will contract for a business outcome and leverage the cloud and get to that next era, and it's a fun time. We're really excited. >> I can imagine you're really a part of the transformation process for a lot of these companies. >> Anant: Absolutely. Anant when we were chatting before we went live you talked about your passion for business outcomes. Can you give us a couple examples of customers or business outcomes that really get you and the team excited? Same thing to you David, after. >> Well, absolutely. Even our contractual structures are now moving into business outcomes. So we are getting paid by the outcomes that we are delivering, right? So, one of the insurance customers that we have we actually get paid by the number of claims that we process, right? Similarly there is a healthcare customer where we actually get paid by the number of customers that we cater to from a Medicare and Medicaid standpoint, right? >> Savannah: Tangible results processed and projected-- >> Successful process of claims. >> Interesting. >> Anant: Exactly. >> Yeah. (indistinct) reality. >> Yeah, reality, (chuckles) What a novel idea. >> Yeah. (Savannah and Lisa chuckle) >> One of the great examples you hear about airplane engines now that the model is you don't buy the engine, you basically pay for the hours that it's used, and the maintenance and the downtime, so that you take the risk away. You know, you put that in the context of the traditional business. You're taking away the risk of owning the individual asset, the maintenance, any of the issues, the bug fixes. And again, you're partnering with a company like Infosys, we'll take on that based upon our knowledge and based upon our vast experience we can confidently contract in that way that, you know, years ago that wasn't possible. >> Savannah: It's kind of a sharing economy at scale style. >> David: Exactly. >> Anant: Absolutely. >> Yeah, which is really exciting. So we have a new challenge here on theCUBE this year at re:Invent. We are looking for your 32nd Instagram real sizzle soundbite. Your hot take, your thought leadership on the biggest theme or most important thing coming out of this year's show. David, we'll start with you. We've been starting with Anant, so I'm going to go to you. We're making eye contact right now so you're in the hot seat. (all laugh) >> Well, I think there was a lot of time given to sustainability on the stage this week, and I think that, you know, every CEO that we talk to is bringing that up as a major priority and that's a very important element for us as a company and as a service provider. >> Savannah: I mean, you're obviously award winning in the sustainability department. >> Exactly. Nice little plug there. >> Yeah. >> You know, and I think the other things that have come up we saw a lot about data analytics this week. You know, I think new offerings from AWS but also new partnerships that we're going to take advantage of. And again, security has been a hot topic. >> Absolutely. Anant, what's your hot take? >> Yeah. I think one very exciting thing for partners like us is the re-imagining that is being done by Ruba for the partners, right? The AWS marketplace. I think that is a big, big thing that I took out. Of course, sustainability is huge. Like Adam said, the fastest way to become sustainable is to move to Cloud, right? So rather than overthinking and over-engineering this whole topic just take your workloads and move it to Cloud and you'll be sustainable, right? So I think that's the second one. And third is of course cybersecurity. Zscaler, Palo Alto, CrowdStrike, these are some of the big companies that are at the event here, and we have been partnering with them. Many more. I'm just calling out three names, but many more. I think cybersecurity is the next one. So I think these are three on top of my mind. >> Just a few things you casually think about. That was great. Great responses from both of you Anant, David, such a pleasure to have you both with us. We hope to have you back again. You're doing such exciting things. I'm sure that everything we talked about is going to be a hot topic for many years to come as people navigate the future as well as continue their business transformations. It is always a joy to sit next to you on stage my dear. >> Likewise. And thank all of you, wherever you're tuning in from, for joining us here at AWS re:Invent live from Las Vegas, Nevada. With Lisa Martin, I'm Savannah Peterson, and for the last time today, this is theCUBE, the leader in high tech coverage. (bright, upbeat music playing)
SUMMARY :
from the show floor, here I can't believe the energy on this show floor, since right before the segment, And of course, we only We don't get to see anything else around David and Anant, welcome We have our first prop of the show, And on the back of that, I mean that's huge. And the second one is, we are We want to target more than So it's the odd numbers, mean on the partnership side and in turn, you know, Anant Yeah, and I bet it's And there's celebration, you know, David: I know. Let's dig into the product a little bit. that we bring to accelerate to do everything faster. And the booth was packed. wants less data slower. has to be a data company. because of course on the consumer side Anant: Yes. on the partner side of it. family here at AWS when you met. and we go together with optimization from the start. and that's exactly what So you guys get to see a and moving it from point A to point B Savannah: I know you're So we call it something called it's about the actual, you know, So then we hear companies So we'll start with you and they said that, you know, Yes, absolutely. And it accelerates the deployments The amount of work. A list of a hundred products. and leverage the cloud the transformation and the team excited? customers that we have Yeah, reality, (chuckles) that the model is you Savannah: It's kind of a So we have a new challenge here and I think that, you know, in the sustainability department. Exactly. we saw a lot about data what's your hot take? and we have been partnering with them. We hope to have you back again. and for the last time
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Ruba | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Savannah | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Anant | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Savannah Peterson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Infosys | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David Wilson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Anant Adya | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one award | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three awards | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first award | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cobalt | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
32nd | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ten | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
less than six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas, Nevada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six technologies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two examples | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |