Monty Barlow, Cambridge Consultants | NetApp: Accelerate Your Journey to AI 2018
[Narrator] From Sunnyvale, California, in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE. Covering Accelerate Your Journey to AI, brought to you by NetApp. >> Hi, I'm Peter Burris and welcome to a great conversation here from NetApp's Data Visionary Center. Specifically, we've got Monty Barlow from Cambridge Consultants. Monty is the head of Artificial Intelligence at a relatively well-known, august, consultant group. Monty, welcome to the Cube. >> Thank you, Peter. Pleased to be here. >> Monty, what we're going to do is we're going to spend a number of minutes talking about some of the trends and transformations that are being made by and wrought by AI. But let's start, what is Cambridge Consultants? >> So, Cambridge Consultants does technology, product, and service development for customers all across the world. Probably about 400 new projects starting each year. And what's a common thread in them is that they're technically difficult and innovative, so there's something really challenging about them they're typically strategic for our customers, and they're looking to do something disruptive and do it fast. >> So, you have a pretty broad range of customers that you're utilizing or you're working with. Let's ask the question then, give us some examples of some of the customer cases that you've been working on, specifically as it relates to AI. >> Sure, so we're working with everything from blue chips to startups, and what they're looking for is slightly different from AI. I can't talk about some of the confidential details but some really interesting applications, for example, one for me, is precision agriculture. We've heard a lot about improving crop yield, but we're reaching the point now where you can drive over a crop and recognize it from a weed and put water on just the crop and pesticide on just the weed, so you get a much better yield, you cut down on water, you cut down on pesticide, and it's a really nice application where it's a win-win for everything. >> So, as we think about some of these big issues associated with inventing technology and inventing AI-related stuff to do many of the things we're talking about, we also have to recognize that there's a social side of introducing AI. There's the invention and then there's the innovative side, which is in many respects the social things. How do you get people to adopt this stuff? What are the challenges that you're seeing customers face as they conceive how best to adopt AI and AI-related capabilities within markets? >> Sure. I think in most of the markets we work in, the benefits are becoming so clear that there's not a massive reluctance to adopt or difficulty. There's obviously in the public, those normal fears about loss of jobs, or safety or security, having machines do jobs for you that you might wish a person to do for you. And those are there in some markets like healthcare, in particular, but many markets see no such problems and the benefits of being able to do innovative things scaleably, flexibly, out performing humans in many cases, it just makes economic sense. >> So, is it just the numbers? Is that what big companies are doing to ensure more rapid time to value for AI related things, or are there other things big companies are doing to try to facilitate the introduction of some of these advanced technologies? >> It depends from company to company, there's all sorts of ways they're approaching this. Maybe trialing early services that introduce people gently to AI, get them accustomed to it, of course, that's what's been the case for social media. None of us believed we were using AI in the early days and then suddenly we realized that we're interacting with it on an almost daily basis. Through to targeted trials, all sorts of different approaches being taken. >> AI's been associated with a lot of different algorithmic forms. It's been a lot of different basic models for thinking about how you do it. Machine learning, deep learning, predictive analysis, recommendation analysis. What's the difference particularly between AI, machine learning, ML and deep learning, DL? >> OK, if I could take a step back for a moment, we've been working with AI for decades, and as you say, there's some really quite old school techniques out there. Decision support, expert systems, where the idea was that you embody the coder's, the programmer's knowledge in a system, and really, all it could do is replay that. So, at best it could act as well as the person who programmed it. >> Very rules-driven. >> Very, very rules-driven. We then, in the early 2000s, saw machine learning beginning to surface more, that's where a system learns, perhaps a few parameters from some data it does learn by itself, but it's doing something quite simple, you know it's from the vibrations in the road, counting the axles of the vehicles going past. Or in an industrial process monitoring temperature, pressure, and saying, "This process is going well." >> But not rules-driven, still data-driven? >> Data-driven. Deep learning just takes, that to a whole new scale. It is still machines learning from data but now a few parameters has become millions or billions. You can now point a camera at a road and recognize all of the different vehicle types, instead of just how many axles they've got, for example. >> And so, the notion of that is that it's a focus on patterns that it discovers out of the data, as opposed to rules or patterns that are put into the data by a developer or by a data person. >> Absolutely, you don't always know what insight you're going to derive from a data set. >> So, I understand that Cambridge Consultants uses a variety of technologies, but specifically, you're utilizing this NetApp and NVIDIA gear in your labs. Talk a little about that experience, how's that been? >> Sure. So, time is everything for us as a business, and for our customers. People want to be first to a particular market window and this AI is still at some level, experimental. We don't know what it's going to do in three or five years time. So, key to our business is a fast turnaround on proof of concepts, how would this work? What would happen? Perhaps our customer's got some data and they need to know if they need a trial to collect more. So, getting through jobs quickly is what matters most to us, and that's what the NVIDIA and NetApp equipment is all about. For GPUs, its the case of big parallel processing large models, crunching the numbers and adjusting the parameters quickly, but equally important is the ability to get data from storage into those GPUs, quickly. >> And so, there is a relationship between the characteristics of the hardware and the success of the AI efforts? >> Absolutely. And it's a really demanding application for file serving. It's the most demanding we've ever seen because it's potentially millions or billions of tiny files that have to be called up in different patterns, quite randomly, it's not just like for example, streaming video, it's too much to cache locally. You need really high performance equipment to manage the data quickly enough that you can learn something in days, and not in months. >> One of the crucial features of any AI development effort is this notion of a data pipeline. How you stage change to the data, where it is, knowing how to move it, when to move it, do it with speed, do it at scale. Talk a little bit about the differences between AI-driven data pipelines and some of the other data pipelines that have been out there. >> Sure. The difference we tend to see on AI is it's touching the real world more directly. So, you may have data coming in live from the edge, from sensors, and that's not as carefully clean, sanitized, formatted as you might expect in a normal, say, enterprise database or data application. So, knowing what to do with those difficult cases, how to format it, what to reject, what to feed in, and then at the other end, how to present that decision, because AI is often making some form of decision, how to present that efficiently back to humans or how to make a quick sensible decision based on that, how to steer the vehicle in the correct direction, how to highlight a cancer, whatever it is we're doing. That pipeline from data first coming in through intelligence and back again to the real world is longer and more complicated and sophisticated than any other data pipeline we've seen before. >> Now, it's that sophistication, that length, the duration of the transactions, for example, that increases the complexity, that ultimately, big companies working with Cambridge Consultants and others, have to address so that they can be successful, get that time to value. But as you think about ultimately the challenges that you're trying to address with customers, what is that you're seeing in their AI projects that are more consistently associated with success, or more, unfortunately, perhaps, consistently associated with having to do it again? >> Sure, I'll limit my answer to those I feel who are doing genuine AI because there is an element of people labeling anything AI. But assuming they are doing something that's only been possible in the last few years that is innovative, difficult and complicated, it's really reaching the right distance. It's stretching themselves the correct amount. So, going into a new market, with new data, a new algorithmic approach is dangerous. There'll be a lot of iteration, a lot of learning needed before that'll come good. If you can take an approach that's beginning to work in one vertical to another, or you can start with data you understand and know perhaps from a previous big data application and start to do more intelligent things with it, then you can achieve these kind of breakthrough innovations and really impressive systems that AI can today. >> So, novel data, practiced algorithms and hardware that works. >> And don't mix up too many new factors together, absolutely. >> Monty Barlow, head of Artificial Intelligence at Cambridge Consultants, thanks very much for being on theCUBE. >> Thank you, Peter. (upbeat electronic music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by NetApp. Monty is the head of Artificial Intelligence Pleased to be here. some of the trends and transformations and they're looking to do something disruptive Let's ask the question then, and pesticide on just the weed, and inventing AI-related stuff to do many of the things and the benefits of being able to do and then suddenly we realized that we're interacting with it What's the difference particularly between AI, and as you say, there's some really quite old school counting the axles of the vehicles going past. and recognize all of the different vehicle types, And so, the notion of that is Absolutely, you don't always know Talk a little about that experience, how's that been? but equally important is the ability to get data from the data quickly enough that you can learn something One of the crucial features of any AI development effort and then at the other end, how to present that decision, that increases the complexity, that ultimately, and start to do more intelligent things with it, and hardware that works. And don't mix up too many new factors together, Monty Barlow, head of Artificial Intelligence Thank you, Peter.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Stephanie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim Richberg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Frower | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Justin Warren | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim Casey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Hershkowitz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stephanie Walter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kenny Holmes | PERSON | 0.99+ |
National Institute of Standards and Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Justin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bobby Patrick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Gilfix | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aaron Powell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NIST | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Daniel Berg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chicago | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michelle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim Casey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Daniel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kenny Holmes | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Monty Barlow | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pensando | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
58% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Maia | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Antonio Neri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
NVIDIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
NASA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bobby | PERSON | 0.99+ |
SMBC Bank | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Randy Meyer, HPE & Paul Shellard, University of Cambridge | HPE Discover 2017 Madrid
>> Announcer: Live from Madrid, Spain, it's the Cube, covering HPE Discover Madrid 2017, brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. >> Welcome back to Madrid, Spain everybody, this is the Cube, the leader in live tech coverage. We're here covering HPE Discover 2017. I'm Dave Vellante with my cohost for the week, Peter Burris, Randy Meyer is back, he's the vice president and general manager Synergy and Mission Critical Solutions at Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Paul Shellerd is here, the director of the Center for Theoretical Cosmology at Cambridge University, thank you very much for coming on the Cube. >> It's a pleasure. >> Good to see you again. >> Yeah good to be back for the second time this week. I think that's, day stay outlets play too. >> Talking about computing meets the cosmos. >> Well it's exciting, yesterday we talked about Superdome Flex that we announced, we talked about it in the commercial space, where it's taking HANA and Orcale databases to the next level but there's a whole different side to what you can do with in memory compute. It's all in this high performance computing space. You think about the problems people want to solve in fluid dynamics, in forecasting, in all sorts of analytics problems, high performance compute, one of the things it does is it generates massive amounts of data that people then want to do things with. They want to compare that data to what their model said, okay can I run that against, they want to take that data and visualize it, okay how do I go do that. The more you can do that in memory, it means it's just faster to deal with because you're not going and writing this stuff off the disk, you're not moving it to another cluster back and forth, so we're seeing this burgeoning, the HPC guys would call it fat nodes, where you want to put lots of memory and eliminate the IO to go make their jobs easier and Professor Shallard will talk about a lot of that in terms of what they're doing at the Cosmos Institute, but this is a trend, you don't have to be a university. We're seeing this inside of oil and gas companies, aerospace engineering companies, anybody that's solving these complex computational problems that have an analytical element to whether it's comparative model, visualize, do something with that once you've done that. >> Paul, explain more about what it is you do. >> Well in the Cosmos Group, of which I'm the head, we're interested in two things, cosmology, which is trying to understand where the universe comes from, the whole big bang and then we're interested in black holes, particularly their collisions which produce gravitational waves, so they're the two main areas, relativity and cosmology. >> That's a big topic. I don't even know where to start, I just want to know okay what have you learned and can you summarize it for a lay person, where are you today, what can you share with us that we can understand? >> What we do is we take our mathematical models and we make predictions about the real universe and so we try and compare those to the latest observational data. We're in a particularly exciting period of time at the moment because of a flood of new data about the universe and about black holes and in the last two years, gravitational waves were discovered, there's a Nobel prize this year so lots of things are happening. It's a very data driven science so we have to try and keep up with this flood of new data which is getting larger and larger and also with new types of data, because suddenly gravitational waves are the latest thing to look at. >> What are the sources of data and new sources of data that you're tapping? >> Well, in cosmology we're mainly interested in the cosmic microwave background. >> Peter: Yeah the sources of data are the cosmos. >> Yeah right, so this is relic radiation left over from the big bang fireball, it's like a photograph of the universe, a blueprint and then also in the distribution of galaxies, so 3D maps of the universe and we've only, we're in a new age of exploration, we've only got a tiny fraction of the universe mapped so far and we're trying to extract new information about the origin of the universe from that data. In relativity, we've got these gravitational waves, these ripples in space time, they're traversing across the universe, they're essentially earthquakes in the universe and they're sound waves or seismic waves that propagate to us from these very violent events. >> I want to take you to the gravitational waves because in many respects, it's an example of a lot of what's here in action. Here's what I mean, that the experiment and correct me if I'm wrong, but it's basically, you create a, have two lasers perpendicular to each other, shooting a signal about two or three miles in that direction and it is the most precise experiment ever undertaken because what you're doing is you're measuring the time it takes for one laser versus another laser and that time is a function of the slight stretching that comes from the gravitational rays. That is an unbelievable example of edge computing, where you have just the tolerances to do that, that's not something you can send back to the cloud, you gotta do a lot of the compute right there, right? >> That's right, yes so a gravitational wave comes by and you shrink one way and you stretch the other. >> Peter: It distorts the space time. >> Yeah you become thinner and these tiny, tiny changes are what's measured and nobody expected gravitational waves to be discovered in 2015, we all thought, oh another five years, another five years, they've always been saying, we'll discover them, we'll discover them, but it happened. >> And since then, it's been used two or three times to discover new types of things and there's now a whole, I'm sure this is very centric to what you're doing, there's now a whole concept of gravitational information, can in fact becomes an entirely new branch of cosmology, have I got that right? >> Yeah you have, it's called multimessenger astronomy now because you don't just see the universe in electromagnetic waves, in light, you hear the universe. This is qualitatively different, it's sound waves coming across the universe and so combining these two, the latest event was where they heard the event first, then they turned their telescope and they saw it. So much information came out of that, even information about cosmology, because these signals are traveling hundreds of billions of light years across to us, we're getting a picture of the whole universe as they propagate all that way, so we're able to measure the expansion rate of the universe from that point. >> The techniques for the observational, the technology for observation, what is that, how has that evolved? >> Well you've got the wrong guy here. I'm from the theory group, we're doing the predictions and these guys with their incredible technology, are seeing the data, seeing and it's imagined, the whole point is you've gotta get the predictions and then you've gotta look in the data for a needle in the haystack which is this signature of these black holes colliding. >> You think about that, I have a model, I'm looking for the needle in the haystack, that's a different way to describe an in memory analytic search pattern recognition problem, that's really what it is. This is the world's largest pattern recognition problem. >> Most precise, and literally. >> And that's an observation that confirms your theory right? >> Confirms the theory, maybe it was your theory. >> I'm actually a cosmologist, so in my group we have relativists who are actively working on the black hole collisions and making predictions about this stuff. >> But they're dampening vibration from passing trucks and these things and correcting it, it's unbelievable. But coming back to the technology, the technology is, one of the reasons why this becomes so exciting and becomes practical is because for the first time, the technology has gotten to the point where you can assume that the problem you're trying to solve, that you're focused on and you don't have to translate it in technology terms, so talk a little bit about, because in many respects, that's where business is. Business wants to be able to focus on the problem and how to think the problem differently and have the technology to just respond. They don't want to have to start with the technology and then imagine what they can do with it. >> I think from our point of view, it's a very fast moving field, things are changing, new data's coming in. The data's getting bigger and bigger because instruments are getting packed tighter and tighter, there's more information, so we've got a computational problem as well, so we've got to get more computational power but there's new types of data, like suddenly there's gravitational waves. There's new types of analysis that we want to do so we want to be able to look at this data in a very flexible way and ingest it and explore new ideas more quickly because things are happening so fast, so that's why we've adopted this in memory paradigm for a number of years now and the latest incarnation of this is the HP Superdome flex and that's a shared memory system, so you can just pull in all your data and explore it without carefully programming how the memory is distributed around. We find this is very easy for our users to develop data analytic pipelines to develop their new theoretical models and to compare the two on the single system. It's also very easy for new users to use. You don't have to be an advanced programmer to get going, you can just stay with the science in a sense. >> You gotta have a PhD in Physics to do great in Physics, you don't have to have a PhD in Physics and technology. >> That's right, yeah it's a very flexible program. A flexible architecture with which to program so you can more or less take your laptop pipeline, develop your pipeline on a laptop, take it to the Superdome and then scale it up to these huge memory problems. >> And get it done fast and you can iterate. >> You know these are the most brilliant scientists in the world, bar none, I made the analogy the other day. >> Oh, thanks. >> You're supposed to say aw, chucks. >> Peter: Aw, chucks. >> Present company excepted. >> Oh yeah, that's right. >> I made the analogy of, imagine I.M. Pei or Frank Lloyd Wright or someone had to be their own general contractor, right? No, they're brilliant at designing architectures and imagining things that no one else could imagine and then they had people to go do that. This allows the people to focus on the brilliance of the science without having to go become the expert programmer, we see that in business too. Parallel programming techniques are difficult, spoken like an old tandem guy, parallelism is hard but to the extent that you can free yourself up and focus on the problem and not have to mess around with that, it makes life easier. Some problems parallelize well, but a lot of them don't need to be and you can allow the data to shine, you can allow the science to shine. >> Is it correct that the barrier in your ability to reach a conclusion or make a discovery is the ability to find that needle in a haystack or maybe there are many, but. >> Well, if you're talking about obstacles to progress, I would say computational power isn't the obstacle, it's developing the software pipelines and it's the human personnel, the smart people writing the codes that can look for the needle in the haystack who have the efficient algorithms to do that and if they're cobbled by having to think very hard about the hardware and the architecture they're working with and how they've parallelized the problem, our philosophy is much more that you solve the problem, you validate it, it can be quite inefficient if you like, but as long as it's a working program that gets you to where you want, then your second stage you worry about making it efficient, putting it on accelerators, putting it on GPUs, making it go really fast and that's, for many years now we've bought these very flexible shared memory or in memory is the new word for it, in memory architectures which allow new users, graduate students to come straight in without a Master's degree in high performance computing, they can start to tackle problems straight away. >> It's interesting, we hear the same, you talk about it at the outer reaches of the universe, I hear it at the inner reaches of the universe from the life sciences companies, we want to map the genome and we want to understand the interaction of various drug combinations with that genetic structure to say can I tune exactly a vaccine or a drug or something else for that patient's genetic makeup to improve medical outcomes? The same kind of problem, I want to have all this data that I have to run against a complex genome sequence to find the one that gets me to the answer. From the macro to the micro, we hear this problem in all different sorts of languages. >> One of the things we have our clients, mainly in business asking us all the time, is with each, let me step back, as analysts, not the smartest people in the world, as you'll attest I'm sure for real, as analysts, we like to talk about change and we always talked about mainframe being replaced by minicomputer being replaced by this or that. I like to talk in terms of the problems that computing's been able to take on, it's been able to take on increasingly complex, challenging, more difficult problems as a consequence of the advance of technology, very much like you're saying, the advance of technology allows us to focus increasingly on the problem. What kinds of problems do you think physicists are gonna be able to attack in the next five years or so as we think about the combination of increasingly powerful computing and an increasingly simple approach to use it? >> I think the simplification you're indicating here is really going to more memory. Holding your whole workload in memory, so that you, one of the biggest bottlenecks we find is ingesting the data and then writing it out, but if you can do everything at once, then that's the key element, so one of the things we've been working on a great deal is in situ visualization for example, so that you see the black holes coming together and you see that you've set the right parameters, they haven't missed each other or something's gone wrong with your simulation, so that you do the post-processing at the same time, you never need the intermediate data products, so larger and larger memory and the computational power that balances with that large memory. It's all very well to get a fat node, but you don't have the computational power to use all those terrabytes, so that's why this in memory architecture of the Superdome Flex is much more balanced between the two. What are the problems that we're looking forward to in terms of physics? Well, in cosmology we're looking for these hints about the origin of the universe and we've made a lot of progress analyzing the Plank satellite data about the cosmic microwave background. We're honing in on theories of inflation, which is where all the structure in the universe comes from, from Heisenberg's uncertainty principle, rapid period of expansion just like inflation in the financial markets in the very early universe, okay and so we're trying to identify can we distinguish between different types and are they gonna tell us whether the universe comes from a higher dimensional theory, ten dimensions, gets reduced to three plus one or lots of clues like that, we're looking for statistical fingerprints of these different models. In gravitational waves of course, this whole new area, we think of the cosmic microwave background as a photograph of the early universe, well in fact gravitational waves look right back to the earliest moment, fractions of a nanosecond after the big bang and so it may be that the answers, the clues that we're looking for come from gravitational waves and of course there's so much in astrophysics that we'll learn about compact objects, about neutron stars, about the most energetic events there are in the whole universe. >> I never thought about the idea, because cosmic radiation background goes back what, about 300,000 years if that's right. >> Yeah that's right, you're very well informed, 400,000 years because 300 is. >> Not that well informed. >> 370,000. >> I never thought about the idea of gravitational waves as being noise from the big bang and you make sense with that. >> Well with the cosmic microwave background, we're actually looking for a primordial signal from the big bang, from inflation, so it's yeah. Well anyway, what were you gonna say Randy? >> No, I just, it's amazing the frontiers we're heading down, it's kind of an honor to be able to enable some of these things, I've spent 30 years in the technology business and heard customers tell me you transformed by business or you helped me save costs, you helped me enter a new market. Never before in 30 plus years of being in this business have I had somebody tell me the things that you're providing are helping me understand the origins of the universe. It's an honor to be affiliated with you guys. >> Oh no, the honor's mine Randy, you're producing the hardware, the tools that allow us to do this work. >> Well now the honor's ours for coming onto the Cube. >> That's right, how do we learn more about your work and your discoveries, inclusions. >> In terms of looking at. >> Are there popular authors we could read other than Stephen Hawking? >> Well, read Stephen's books, they're very good, he's got a new one called A Briefer History of Time so it's more accessible than the Brief History of Time. >> So your website is. >> Yeah our website is ctc.cam.ac.uk, the center for theoretical cosmology and we've got some popular pages there, we've got some news stories about the latest things that have happened like the HP partnership that we're developing and some nice videos about the work that we're doing actually, very nice videos of that. >> Certainly, there were several videos run here this week that if people haven't seen them, go out, they're available on Youtube, they're available at your website, they're on Stephen's Facebook page also I think. >> Can you share that website again? >> Well, actually you can get the beautiful videos of Stephen and the rest of his group on the Discover website, is that right? >> I believe so. >> So that's at HP Discover website, but your website is? >> Is ctc.cam.ac.uk and we're just about to upload those videos ourselves. >> Can I make a marketing suggestion. >> Yeah. >> Simplify that. >> Ctc.cam.ac.uk. >> Yeah right, thank you. >> We gotta get the Cube at one of these conferences, one of these physics conferences and talk about gravitational waves. >> Bone up a little bit, you're kind of embarrassing us here, 100,000 years off. >> He's better informed than you are. >> You didn't need to remind me sir. Thanks very much for coming on the Cube, great pleasure having you today. >> Thank you. >> Keep it right there everybody, Mr. Universe and I will be back after this short break. (upbeat techno music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. the director of the Center for Theoretical Cosmology Yeah good to be back for the second time this week. to what you can do with in memory compute. Well in the Cosmos Group, of which I'm the head, okay what have you learned and can you summarize it and in the last two years, gravitational waves in the cosmic microwave background. in the universe and they're sound waves or seismic waves and it is the most precise experiment ever undertaken and you shrink one way and you stretch the other. Yeah you become thinner and these tiny, tiny changes of the universe from that point. I'm from the theory group, we're doing the predictions for the needle in the haystack, that's a different way and making predictions about this stuff. the technology has gotten to the point where you can assume to get going, you can just stay with the science in a sense. You gotta have a PhD in Physics to do great so you can more or less take your laptop pipeline, in the world, bar none, I made the analogy the other day. This allows the people to focus on the brilliance is the ability to find that needle in a haystack the problem, our philosophy is much more that you solve From the macro to the micro, we hear this problem One of the things we have our clients, at the same time, you never need the I never thought about the idea, Yeah that's right, you're very well informed, from the big bang and you make sense with that. from the big bang, from inflation, so it's yeah. It's an honor to be affiliated with you guys. the hardware, the tools that allow us to do this work. and your discoveries, inclusions. so it's more accessible than the Brief History of Time. that have happened like the HP partnership they're available at your website, to upload those videos ourselves. We gotta get the Cube at one of these conferences, of embarrassing us here, 100,000 years off. You didn't need to remind me sir. Keep it right there everybody, Mr. Universe and I
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Stephen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Randy Meyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Heisenberg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank Lloyd Wright | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Shellerd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cosmos Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Center for Theoretical Cosmology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
A Briefer History of Time | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Cosmos Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Randy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100,000 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ten dimensions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three miles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second stage | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Paul Shellard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ctc.cam.ac.uk | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Shallard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stephen Hawking | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Brief History of Time | TITLE | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
Ctc.cam.ac.uk | OTHER | 0.98+ |
two lasers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Madrid, Spain | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
400,000 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
hundreds of billions of light years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
Discover | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Madrid | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
second time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about 300,000 years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two main areas | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
University of Cambridge | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Superdome flex | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.96+ |
Nobel prize | TITLE | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
about two | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one way | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one laser | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
HANA | TITLE | 0.94+ |
single system | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
HP Discover | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Youtube | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Universe | PERSON | 0.92+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Professor | PERSON | 0.89+ |
last two years | DATE | 0.88+ |
I.M. Pei | PERSON | 0.88+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.87+ |
370,000 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Cambridge University | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
Synergy | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
Plank | LOCATION | 0.8+ |
300 | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
several videos | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
next five years | DATE | 0.64+ |
HPC | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
a nanosecond | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
KubeCon + CloudNativeCon 2022 Preview w/ @Stu
>>Keon Cloud Native Con kicks off in Detroit on October 24th, and we're pleased to have Stewart Miniman, who's the director of Market Insights, hi, at, for hybrid platforms at Red Hat back in the studio to help us understand the key trends to look for at the events. Do welcome back, like old, old, old >>Home. Thank you, David. It's great to, great to see you and always love doing these previews, even though Dave, come on. How many years have I told you Cloud native con, It's a hoodie crowd. They're gonna totally call you out for where in a tie and things like that. I, I know you want to be an ESPN sportscaster, but you know, I I, I, I still don't think even after, you know, this show's been around for so many years that there's gonna be too many ties into Troy. I >>Know I left the hoodie in my off, I'm sorry folks, but hey, we'll just have to go for it. Okay. Containers generally, and Kubernetes specifically continue to show very strong spending momentum in the ETR survey data. So let's bring up this slide that shows the ETR sectors, all the sectors in the tax taxonomy with net score or spending velocity in the vertical axis and pervasiveness on the horizontal axis. Now, that red dotted line that you see, that marks the elevated 40% mark, anything above that is considered highly elevated in terms of momentum. Now, for years, the big four areas of momentum that shine above all the rest have been cloud containers, rpa, and ML slash ai for the first time in 10 quarters, ML and AI and RPA have dropped below the 40% line, leaving only cloud and containers in rarefied air. Now, Stu, I'm sure this data doesn't surprise you, but what do you make of this? >>Yeah, well, well, Dave, I, I did an interview with at Deepak who owns all the container and open source activity at Amazon earlier this year, and his comment was, the default deployment mechanism in Amazon is containers. So when I look at your data and I see containers and cloud going in sync, yeah, that, that's, that's how we see things. We're helping lots of customers in their overall adoption. And this cloud native ecosystem is still, you know, we're still in that Cambridge explosion of new projects, new opportunities, AI's a great workload for these type type of technologies. So it's really becoming pervasive in the marketplace. >>And, and I feel like the cloud and containers go hand in hand, so it's not surprising to see those two above >>The 40%. You know, there, there's nothing to say that, Look, can I run my containers in my data center and not do the public cloud? Sure. But in the public cloud, the default is the container. And one of the hot discussions we've been having in this ecosystem for a number of years is edge computing. And of course, you know, I want something that that's small and lightweight and can do things really fast. A lot of times it's an AI workload out there, and containers is a great fit at the edge too. So wherever it goes, containers is a good fit, which has been keeping my group at Red Hat pretty busy. >>So let's talk about some of those high level stats that we put together and preview for the event. So it's really around the adoption of open source software and Kubernetes. Here's, you know, a few fun facts. So according to the state of enterprise open source report, which was published by Red Hat, although it was based on a blind survey, nobody knew that that Red Hat was, you know, initiating it. 80% of IT execs expect to increase their use of enterprise open source software. Now, the CNCF community has currently more than 120,000 developers. That's insane when you think about that developer resource. 73% of organizations in the most recent CNCF annual survey are using Kubernetes. Now, despite the momentum, according to that same Red Hat survey, adoption barriers remain for some organizations. Stu, I'd love you to talk about this specifically around skill sets, and then we've highlighted some of the other trends that we expect to see at the event around Stu. I'd love to, again, your, get your thoughts on the preview. You've done a number of these events, automation, security, governance, governance at scale, edge deployments, which you just mentioned among others. Now Kubernetes is eight years old, and I always hear people talking about there's something coming beyond Kubernetes, but it looks like we're just getting started. Yeah, >>Dave, It, it is still relatively early days. The CMC F survey, I think said, you know, 96% of companies when they, when CMC F surveyed them last year, were either deploying Kubernetes or had plans to deploy it. But when I talked to enterprises, nobody has said like, Hey, we've got every group on board and all of our applications are on. It is a multi-year journey for most companies and plenty of them. If you, you look at the general adoption of technology, we're still working through kind of that early majority. We, you know, passed the, the chasm a couple of years ago. But to a point, you and I we're talking about this ecosystem, there are plenty of people in this ecosystem that could care less about containers and Kubernetes. Lots of conversations at this show won't even talk about Kubernetes. You've got, you know, big security group that's in there. >>You've got, you know, certain workloads like we talked about, you know, AI and ml and that are in there. And automation absolutely is playing a, a good role in what's going on here. So in some ways, Kubernetes kind of takes a, a backseat because it is table stakes at this point. So lots of people involved in it, lots of activities still going on. I mean, we're still at a cadence of three times a year now. We slowed it down from four times a year as an industry, but there's, there's still lots of innovation happening, lots of adoption, and oh my gosh, Dave, I mean, there's just no shortage of new projects and new people getting involved. And what's phenomenal about it is there's, you know, end user practitioners that aren't just contributing. But many of the projects were spawned out of work by the likes of Intuit and Spotify and, and many others that created some of the projects that sit alongside or above the, the, you know, the container orchestration itself. >>So before we talked about some of that, it's, it's kind of interesting. It's like Kubernetes is the big dog, right? And it's, it's kind of maturing after, you know, eight years, but it's still important. I wanna share another data point that underscores the traction that containers generally are getting in Kubernetes specifically have, So this is data from the latest ETR survey and shows the spending breakdown for Kubernetes in the ETR data set for it's cut for respondents with 50 or more citations in, in by the IT practitioners that lime green is new adoptions, the forest green is spending 6% or more relative to last year. The gray is flat spending year on year, and those little pink bars, that's 6% or down spending, and the bright red is retirements. So they're leaving the platform. And the blue dots are net score, which is derived by subtracting the reds from the greens. And the yellow dots are pervasiveness in the survey relative to the sector. So the big takeaway here is that there is virtually no red, essentially zero churn across all sectors, large companies, public companies, private firms, telcos, finance, insurance, et cetera. So again, sometimes I hear this things beyond Kubernetes, you've mentioned several, but it feels like Kubernetes is still a driving force, but a lot of other projects around Kubernetes, which we're gonna hear about at the show. >>Yeah. So, so, so Dave, right? First of all, there was for a number of years, like, oh wait, you know, don't waste your time on, on containers because serverless is gonna rule the world. Well, serverless is now a little bit of a broader term. Can I do a serverless viewpoint for my developers that they don't need to think about the infrastructure but still have containers underneath it? Absolutely. So our friends at Amazon have a solution called Fargate, their proprietary offering to kind of hide that piece of it. And in the open source world, there's a project called Can Native, I think it's the second or third can Native Con's gonna happen at the cncf. And even if you use this, I can still call things over on Lambda and use some of those functions. So we know Dave, it is additive and nothing ever dominates the entire world and nothing ever dies. >>So we have, we have a long runway of activities still to go on in containers and Kubernetes. We're always looking for what that next thing is. And what's great about this ecosystem is most of it tends to be additive and plug into the pieces there, there's certain tools that, you know, span beyond what can happen in the container world and aren't limited to it. And there's others that are specific for it. And to talk about the industries, Dave, you know, I love, we we have, we have a community event that we run that's gonna happen at Cubans called OpenShift Commons. And when you look at like, who's speaking there? Oh, we've got, you know, for Lockheed Martin, University of Michigan and I g Bank all speaking there. So you look and it's like, okay, cool, I've got automotive, I've got, you know, public sector, I've got, you know, university education and I've got finance. So all of you know, there is not an industry that is not touched by this. And the general wave of software adoption is the reason why, you know, not just adoption, but the creation of new software is one of the differentiators for companies. And that is what, that's the reason why I do containers, isn't because it's some cool technology and Kubernetes is great to put on my resume, but that it can actually accelerate my developers and help me create technology that makes me respond to my business and my ultimate end users. Well, >>And you know, as you know, we've been talking about the Supercloud a lot and the Kubernetes is clearly enabler to, to Supercloud, but I wanted to go back, you and John Furrier have done so many of, you know, the, the cube cons, but but go back to Docker con before Kubernetes was even a thing. And so you sort of saw this, you know, grow. I think there's what, how many projects are in CNCF now? I mean, hundreds. Hundreds, okay. And so you're, Will we hear things in Detroit, things like, you know, new projects like, you know, Argo and capabilities around SI store and things like that? Well, you're gonna hear a lot about that. Or is it just too much to cover? >>So I, I mean the, the good news, Dave, is that the CNCF really is, is a good steward for this community and new things got in get in. So there's so much going on with the existing projects that some of the new ones sometimes have a little bit of a harder time making a little bit of buzz. One of the more interesting ones is a project that's been around for a while that I think back to the first couple of Cube Cuban that John and I did service Mesh and Istio, which was created by Google, but lived under basically a, I guess you would say a Google dominated governance for a number of years is now finally under the CNCF Foundation. So I talked to a number of companies over the years and definitely many of the contributors over the years that didn't love that it was a Google Run thing, and now it is finally part. >>So just like Kubernetes is, we have SEO and also can Native that I mentioned before also came outta Google and those are all in the cncf. So will there be new projects? Yes. The CNCF is sometimes they, they do matchmaking. So in some of the observability space, there were a couple of projects that they said, Hey, maybe you can go merge down the road. And they ended up doing that. So there's still you, you look at all these projects and if I was an end user saying, Oh my God, there is so much change and so many projects, you know, I can't spend the time in the effort to learn about all of these. And that's one of the challenges and something obviously at Red Hat, we spend a lot of time figuring out, you know, not to make winners, but which are the things that customers need, Where can we help make them run in production for our, our customers and, and help bring some stability and a little bit of security for the overall ecosystem. >>Well, speaking of security, security and, and skill sets, we've talked about those two things and they sort of go hand in hand when I go to security events. I mean, we're at reinforced last summer, we were just recently at the CrowdStrike event. A lot of the discussion is sort of best practice because it's so complicated. And, and, and will you, I presume you're gonna hear a lot of that here because security securing containers now, you know, the whole shift left thing and shield right is, is a complicated matter, especially when you saw with the earlier data from the Red Hat survey, the the gaps are around skill sets. People don't have the skill. So should we expect to hear a lot about that, A lot of sort of how to, how to take advantage of some of these new capabilities? >>Yeah, Dave, absolutely. So, you know, one of the conversations going on in the community right now is, you know, has DevOps maybe played out as we expect to see it? There's a newer term called platform engineering, and how much do I need to do there? Something that I, I know your, your team's written a lot about Dave, is how much do you need to know versus what can you shift to just a platform or a service that I can consume? I've talked a number of times with you since I've been at Red Hat about the cloud services that we offer. So you want to use our offering in the public cloud. Our first recommendation is, hey, we've got cloud services, how much Kubernetes do you really want to learn versus you want to do what you can build on top of it, modernize the pieces and have less running the plumbing and electric and more, you know, taking advantage of the, the technologies there. So that's a big thing we've seen, you know, we've got a big SRE team that can manage that for use so that you have to spend less time worrying about what really is un differentiated heavy lifting and spend more time on what's important to your business and your >>Customers. So, and that's, and that's through a managed service. >>Yeah, absolutely. >>That whole space is just taken off. All right, Stu I'll give you the final word. You know, what are you excited about for, for, for this upcoming event and Detroit? Interesting choice of venue? Yeah, >>Look, first of off, easy flight. I've, I've never been to Detroit, so I'm, I'm willing to give it a shot and hopefully, you know, that awesome airport. There's some, some, some good things there to learn. The show itself is really a choose your own adventure because there's so much going on. The main show of QAN and cloud Native Con is Wednesday through Friday, but a lot of a really interesting stuff happens on Monday and Tuesday. So we talked about things like OpenShift Commons in the security space. There's cloud Native Security Day, which is actually two days and a SIG store event. There, there's a get up show, there's, you know, k native day. There's so many things that if you want to go deep on a topic, you can go spend like a workshop in some of those you can get hands on to. And then at the show itself, there's so much, and again, you can learn from your peers. >>So it was good to see we had, during the pandemic, it tilted a little bit more vendor heavy because I think most practitioners were pretty busy focused on what they could work on and less, okay, hey, I'm gonna put together a presentation and maybe I'm restricted at going to a show. Yeah, not, we definitely saw that last year when I went to LA I was disappointed how few customer sessions there were. It, it's back when I go look through the schedule now there's way more end users sharing their stories and it, it's phenomenal to see that. And the hallway track, Dave, I didn't go to Valencia, but I hear it was really hopping felt way more like it was pre pandemic. And while there's a few people that probably won't come because Detroit, we think there's, what we've heard and what I've heard from the CNCF team is they are expecting a sizable group up there. I know a lot of the hotels right near the, where it's being held are all sold out. So it should be, should be a lot of fun. Good thing I'm speaking on an edge panel. First time I get to be a speaker at the show, Dave, it's kind of interesting to be a little bit of a different role at the show. >>So yeah, Detroit's super convenient, as I said. Awesome. Airports too. Good luck at the show. So it's a full week. The cube will be there for three days, Tuesday, Wednesday, Thursday. Thanks for coming. >>Wednesday, Thursday, Friday, sorry, >>Wednesday, Thursday, Friday is the cube, right? So thank you for that. >>And, and no ties from the host, >>No ties, only hoodies. All right Stu, thanks. Appreciate you coming in. Awesome. And thank you for watching this preview of CubeCon plus cloud Native Con with at Stu, which again starts the 24th of October, three days of broadcasting. Go to the cube.net and you can see all the action. We'll see you there.
SUMMARY :
Red Hat back in the studio to help us understand the key trends to look for at the events. I know you want to be an ESPN sportscaster, but you know, I I, I, I still don't think even Now, that red dotted line that you And this cloud native ecosystem is still, you know, we're still in that Cambridge explosion And of course, you know, I want something that that's small and lightweight and Here's, you know, a few fun facts. I think said, you know, 96% of companies when they, when CMC F surveyed them last year, You've got, you know, certain workloads like we talked about, you know, AI and ml and that And it's, it's kind of maturing after, you know, eight years, but it's still important. oh wait, you know, don't waste your time on, on containers because serverless is gonna rule the world. And the general wave of software adoption is the reason why, you know, And you know, as you know, we've been talking about the Supercloud a lot and the Kubernetes is clearly enabler to, to Supercloud, definitely many of the contributors over the years that didn't love that it was a Google Run the observability space, there were a couple of projects that they said, Hey, maybe you can go merge down the road. securing containers now, you know, the whole shift left thing and shield right is, So, you know, one of the conversations going on in the community right now is, So, and that's, and that's through a managed service. All right, Stu I'll give you the final word. There, there's a get up show, there's, you know, k native day. I know a lot of the hotels right near the, where it's being held are all sold out. Good luck at the show. So thank you for that. Go to the cube.net and you can see all the action.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lockheed Martin | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
6% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Detroit | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October 24th | DATE | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stewart Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
96% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
University of Michigan | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CMC F | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Wednesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
eight years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
73% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
LA | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
more than 120,000 developers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24th of October | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.98+ |
CubeCon | EVENT | 0.98+ |
CNCF Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
cube.net | OTHER | 0.98+ |
last summer | DATE | 0.98+ |
Valencia | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Spotify | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Intuit | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
cloud Native Security Day | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.97+ |
QAN | EVENT | 0.97+ |
ESPN | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Josh Epstein, Tech Tackles Cancer
(upbeat music) >> On June 21st in Cambridge mass at the Sinclair in Harvard Square, Tech Tackles Cancer is back after a COVID hiatus with live band karaoke and some local tech celebrities raising money for a great cause. The Cube is a media sponsor of the event and Josh Epstein, local marketing exec and one of the events organizers is here to tell us more. Josh, good to see you, welcome. >> Good to be here, Dave. >> So tell us about this event. What's going on? What are the logistics? How's that all work? >> Yeah, we're super excited. So as you said, June 21st at the Sinclair in Harvard Square, Sinclair, if you haven't been there is just the great old school rock club. So we'll be there from 6:00 to 10:00. We will have live band karaoke. So the main event and kind of the primary fundraising approach here is that we have some celebrity technology rock gods these featured performers like Chris Lynch who was the founder of Tech Tackles Cancer, who are are raising money from basically now, up until June 21st. Then at the event, their fundraising will culminate with them singing a live song backed by a live band. And the awards will be given out to the most money raised, the best performance and the best stage presence. So it will be a lot of fun. >> So the fundraising format is I sign up to sing do the karaoke with a live band which is a little bit different. And then I raise as much dough as possible. So obviously that's competitive. >> It's competitive, I think that we ask for a minimum of $10,000 targeted for each of the fundraisers but knowing these guys, knowing guys like Chris Lynch, they don't like to lose. So the bet here is that people are going to go out, they're going to hit their network and they are going to look to kind of raise the most money. So we anticipate this to be a great event with a lot of money raised and a lot of fun. >> So we have a graphic from Alex. If you could bring that up of the people who have signed up for this already. We got Steve Duplessie, founder of of ESG, senior analyst. They sold their company to Tech Target, which is awesome. Congratulations to those guys and thank you for stepping up. George Hope, who heads partner sales for HPE, Joe Lemay of Rocketbook Nathan Hall from Pure Storage, system engineering guy and of course, Steiny, Ken Steinhardt from Infinidat. He was at EMC, he's the field CTO now. He's going to be up there singing. So of course, Chris. >> Absolutely, these are just the early entrance here. So we just started really working our networks. And obviously, I'm a Boston tech guy kind of working the storage networks, the networking networks and kind of the other folks that are around. So as we come out of stealth here in April and start really recruiting, we anticipate having probably 10 to 15 of these featured performers, really fundraising performers that we'll sing. And then we're also obviously soliciting broader donations from anyone who wants to come to the event or just give to the cause and the corporate sponsorships as well. >> All right, so you got corporate sponsorships. You can sing, you can donate you can be there just to support it. That's fantastic and the awards, how's that work? >> Yeah, so we're excited. So first off, most money raised wins an award. So we'll have a leaderboard on the website, we'll be able to kind of track who's raised what, at the event, we're going to have some celebrity judges that will be actually voting for their favorites and then have a crowdsource component as well. So we'll introduce what that mechanism is. But as people, either at the events or a watching in streamed live on LinkedIn live, we'll actually vote for their favorite performance as well as their their pick for best stage presence which we know in rock and roll is half the battle. >> Now this cause has raised a bunch of, I think last time, you guys did this, it was probably a quarter million or close to it and you support multiple causes. What causes are you supporting? >> Sure, yeah, actually I think since they founded the event several years ago they raised over $2 million. This year for this format where we're looking, we can really up our game here but this year we're supporting two really great causes that are both focused on pediatric cancer. The first is St. Batrick's that is really committed to raising funds for research to really help stamp out pediatric cancer really. The approach to researching cures and treatments to pediatric cancer is very different from regular adult cancer. So St. Batrick's does a great job of picking those research projects that really target in on those pediatric cancer causes. And then the second is one mission. And one mission really outlooks to help make pediatric cancer patients that are spending time in the hospital, making their time less stressful, less painful, less sad, less boring. And so they do a lot of fundraising and contributions targeting children's hospitals, really around the country for those pediatric cancer floors. >> Josh, amazing cause. Thanks so much for coming onto the Cube and explaining all that. >> Great, thanks David. >> All right, June 21st, go to ttcfund.org, Tech Tackles Cancer fund, ttcffund.org for more information and you can donate. We'll see you there. (soft music)
SUMMARY :
and one of the events organizers What are the logistics? and kind of the primary So the fundraising So the bet here is that So of course, Chris. and kind of the other That's fantastic and the at the event, we're going to or close to it and you really around the country for Thanks so much for coming onto the Cube go to ttcfund.org, Tech Tackles
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Duplessie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ken Steinhardt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joe Lemay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George Hope | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Josh Epstein | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Josh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steiny | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Lynch | PERSON | 0.99+ |
June 21st | DATE | 0.99+ |
April | DATE | 0.99+ |
Harvard Square | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ttcfund.org | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Alex | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over $2 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ESG | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tech Tackles Cancer | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ttcffund.org | OTHER | 0.99+ |
one mission | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tech Target | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
several years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$10,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10:00 | DATE | 0.99+ |
6:00 | DATE | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Pure Storage | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Infinidat | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
This year | DATE | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Rocketbook | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Sinclair | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Nathan Hall | PERSON | 0.94+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ | |
quarter million | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
St. Batrick's | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
Tech Tackles Cancer fund | OTHER | 0.88+ |
great causes | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
St. Batrick | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
one of the events | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
COVID | EVENT | 0.6+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
Priyanka Sharma, CNCF | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2021
hey welcome back to los angeles thecube is live here at kubecon cloud native con 2021 we're so excited to be here in person lisa martin with dave nicholson and we are here with priyanka sharma the executive director of cnc at prayanka welcome to the program thank you so much for having me first of all congratulations on doing an event in person in such a safe clean way i was really impressed when i walked in this morning was asked for my vaccination record my temperature was scanned you're proving you can do these events safely this isn't rocket science so agreed and i'm so glad you appreciate all the measures we've put in place because this is how we can do it in-person interaction is essential for us as human beings for us as professionals and so we owe it to each other to just do the right thing you know have a vaccine requirement wear your masks have these what i call the traffic light uh system where if you have a green a green band it means people can come a little closer it's okay red means please at least six feet of distance and these things go a long way in making an event successful in times like this they do i love that when i saw that mine keeps falling off i'm cold so it keeps falling i'm green just so you know i know you're green what about you i'm green here you can can i have yours that's my favorite and you know you fell off again you had um the three folks that came up who were uh like uh co-chairs co-chairs yeah yeah and uh and they did almost a little almost a little skit yes that on the surface people could say well that's ridiculous and it's like no it's not it's giving everybody the guidelines so that everyone can be comfortable because when i see your green wristband i understand that you are comfortable because i don't want to accidentally reach out to give you a fist bump when you might be particularly of course yeah yeah so no visual cues make it easy yes yeah yeah very very easy very comfortable talk about the energy at the event this is the second full day tina was standing room only yesterday give us an overview of the energy and some of the things that are happening since you can't replicate those hallway networking conversations on video conference i know exactly what you mean man it is so lovely to be in person to meet people and you know for those who are comfortable there's like the fist bumps and the hugs and the big smiles and that energy i haven't seen it in almost two years um and even you know just standing on stage as i was telling you folks uh off camera i've been in this role for over a year and a close to a year and a half i've done three cube cons already but this was my first in person and being on that stage experiencing the energy of the people in that room like when i asked everyone during my keynote i was like are you all proud to be team cloud native and i got a resounding yes back from the audience that's what i'm talking about yeah you know it was amazing what's some of the news that's breaking lots of stuff going on obviously some first one in person in almost two years but talk to me about some of the the news that's breaking here at the event yes so so much new stuff to share um from our side on cncf our journey has been very much about being celebrating our culture and welcoming more and more people into it so that we can have more folks in team cloud native to take various jobs to find fulfillment and all those great things right and all of our announcements are around that theme of people finding a place here people paying it forward in this community and building the culture the first one i would like to share is the announcement of the kubernetes and cloud native associate certification so this is an exam that is going to go live end of the year so people sign up apparently the beta signups went away like this after i announced it so it was really cool wow popular by demanding yeah very very popular and it's it's an exam for folks who are brand new to cloud native and it the studying for it you'll go through you know the fun fundamentals of kubernetes what is the cncf landscape what are the key projects and ultimately you will actually deploy an application using coop cuddle commands and it's such a great primer so so how brand new can someone be when you when you say brand new are you talking about someone who already has a phd in computer science but hasn't done anything in the kubernetes space tell me how brand new can you be uh-huh that's a very good question and it is literally you can come with zero knowledge you would of course have to study for the exam and like go through that journey but the idea is that it is the gateway and so it is possible you're a phd in computer science but you've studied some esoteric part of computer science that's very unconnected to what we do sure go ahead and take it but maybe most likely you would like the more advanced certifications better but if you're let's say a marketer looking to break into the cloud native industry this is the move take this exam and suddenly all these employers you speak their language they'll be impressed that you took it and it's it's an opportunity to advance your career the oh community is huge i was looking at the website the other day 138 000 contributors yes from more than 177 countries 186 is the latest number 186 awesome 289 plus million lines of code written this community is really so productive and so prolific and it's great that you're offering more folks that don't have the background like you were saying to be able to get in and get started absolutely it's our whole thing of bring in more people because as you all probably know there's so much demand for cloud native skill sets across job functions so that's why we're here to help with yeah i you know i i want to double click on this as we say because you hear the word inclusive associated with this whole community so much um you're talking about something that is a certification yeah a marketer okay fine but we're really talking about anyone who has the drive to potentially completely transform their lives yes and in this age where things can be done remotely you don't necessarily have to live in silicon valley or cambridge massachusetts to do this or in one of the other global centers of technology anywhere yeah so that's the that's the kind of energy that's part of this that isn't a part of any large industry focused conference because you really are making opportunities for people of all backgrounds to change their lives so i don't know i don't am i extending a a virtual thank you from all of those people whose lives have been changed and will be changed in the future maybe i am but so but talk about inclusiveness in in you know from from other perspectives yes i think that you know talent drive skills none of these are exclusive to a certain zip code you know people everywhere have great qualities and deserve chances and why shouldn't they be part of a community that as you said is especially inclusive feels especially nice to be a part of and that's what i exhorted the community to do in my keynote yesterday which is that our ranks will grow and we should go out of our way to make sure our ranks grow and we do that by shining a light on our culture telling people to join in lending a hand and you know letting people's personalities shine even when they'll be different from who we are whether in terms of job function or skill set whatever and i think that's the top level um paradigm that we want to have right where we are always welcoming people when we think of inclusiveness it is you know there is certifications like kcna did do a great job there are also efforts that we must always be doing so something that we work on constantly consistently is contributor strategy where we're working on creating ladders and pathways for folks to become open source contributors it is known now that open source contributions lead to job advancement in your career right and so the whole goal is bring people in not just to hang out not just to talk but to actually grow and actually kubecon cloudnativecon is a great example of another little thing we do which is uh we uh award uh underrepresented minorities and people who are who need need-based funds scholarships to attend nice yeah and it's changed one thousand 1518 lives already and we actually uh in uh in this event have announced that we are renaming the scholarship to the dan khan scholarship fund um i i do you folks know dan yes did yeah so dan he breathed life into team cloud native right he built this organization to have the impact that it does today and all the while he was relentlessly focused on diversity equity inclusion so it was it was just like the idea came from within the team and the minute someone said it it just struck a chord with all of us yeah we're like we're doing this no question and it was one of the fastest decisions we've ever made i saw uh some results of a dei micro survey on the website where 75 percent of respondents say this community is becoming more inclusive there's obviously work to go but as a female in technology you feel that you see that as well yes i think i'm very proud of that survey that we did by the way because it's our way we're going to keep doing it it's our way to keep a pulse on the ecosystem because you can keep doing initiatives right but if people are not feeling great then who cares and so um but yes i think dei is a journey if there is no destination right always we have to be thinking harder trying harder to you know i think for example something cncf's done a great job is identifying particularly gender diverse folks who are in the community and maybe could deserve a role of high responsibility so i'm really proud that our technical oversight committee which is our really the top technical people in the ecosystem who desi decide project stuff they are led by a woman there's many women on that and it's they're all very exemplary awesome technologists and so i think um the diversity survey gives us like a hint into like the things people do like and i mean the fact remains we need to do more to source more people to come into the ecosystem we need to always be changing and evolving with the needs of the community right as i mentioned the community is 138 000 strong 6.8 million plus contributions so far you can imagine by opening that dei door just the thought diversity that comes in alone and the number of projects that will come from folks that just come in with a different mindset oh 100 we are already seeing that um we started off as folks who had you know lots of projects from the great big tech companies people who had web scale problems as i call it and that was great but in recent years the end users who are initially just consuming this technology and that too slowly are now hook line and sinker in and we have like argo cd came from intuit which is an end user uh backstage came from spotify which is an end user so this trend is growing and the diversity as you said is continuing yeah i i'm particularly interested in the dynamic where you have people who have their day job if you will where their employer is absolutely 100 encouraging them to participate in the community to develop things that will not only help the employer and that mission but also building uh solutions for everyone and providing enrichment for the for the person and and i i'm i'm going to make a little bit of a prediction i want to get your thoughts on this i think that um one of the silver linings of what we've been through in the pandemic having a lot of people at home having that relationship with your primary employer be just a little bit different and just a little bit more removed i think everyone is realizing that you know what um we all need a passion play to be a part of in addition to whatever we're doing to put bread on the table in the immediate future and so i i think that i want to hear your thoughts there's going to be an explosion in contributions from people and hopefully a lot more openness on the part of employers to let people dedicate their time to this do you do you see that do you think that yes i think i think you're really on to something here um something i mentioned in my keynote right was this conversation i've had with so many that we in this community our identity is cloud native first so we're folks who are in team cloud native before we are working at insert company name you know um google at t spotify whatever it's not a dig on the company it's actually a celebration of those companies because they are liking the developments that happen in open source they are appreciating the value these people are creating and they're employing them so absolutely there is this ongoing trend of folks seeing great value in folks who understand this cloud native projects in particular and of course right because we have been such a great place for industry collaboration lots of vendors have great products make lots of money on these projects and that's as it should be and so the value of the people contributing to these projects is very high and it will only continue to grow i imagine so so here we are in los angeles at kubecon cloud native con 21 what's what's next well uh the good news is this was the first of many to come hybrid events in person plus virtual and the next one is happening in end of may in valencia for europe 22. valencia spain and i have heard beautiful weather very nice people amazing food so just for that that alone is worth registration yes i know right it's going to be amazing i'm so excited and i hope i will see you folks there sign me up i've never been to spain i'm there me too let's do it excited let's do it for our spanish-speaking uh viewers i will say claroque he you can't you do you can do it all you can speak spanish on the queue we can have something honestly i'm impressed i'm impressed i can't i can't do that any and you donated your green card so thank you so much so nice congratulations on the event thank you uh for growing the community for and growing the diversity of it and for the the projects that are going on now and we're sure many more to come we look forward to seeing you in valencia in may thank you so much see you in valencia all right we'll see you there for dave nicholson i'm lisa martin we are live in los angeles the cube is covering kubecon and cloudnativecon at 21. stick around we'll be back after a short break with our next guest
SUMMARY :
that don't have the background like you
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Priyanka Sharma | PERSON | 0.99+ |
lisa martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
valencia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
dave nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
los angeles | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
more than 177 countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three folks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
spotify | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
289 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
cambridge massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one thousand | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
138 000 contributors | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
spanish | OTHER | 0.98+ |
silicon valley | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
a year and a half | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
kcna | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
priyanka sharma | PERSON | 0.96+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.96+ |
186 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
CloudNativeCon | EVENT | 0.95+ |
second full day | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
valencia spain | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
138 000 strong | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
zero knowledge | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
tina | PERSON | 0.93+ |
europe | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
today | DATE | 0.92+ |
dan | PERSON | 0.92+ |
cnc | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
CNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
prayanka | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
6.8 million plus | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
75 percent of | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
almost two years | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
kubecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
over a year and a | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
almost two years | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ | |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.81+ |
cloudnativecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
million lines | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.77+ |
NA 2021 | EVENT | 0.74+ |
end of may | DATE | 0.73+ |
cncf | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
least six feet | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
of money | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
con | EVENT | 0.69+ |
lot of people | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
one of the fastest | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.61+ |
end | DATE | 0.6+ |
1518 lives | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
executive | PERSON | 0.59+ |
may | DATE | 0.57+ |
cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
kubecon cloud native | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
dan khan | PERSON | 0.54+ |
intuit | ORGANIZATION | 0.53+ |
t | ORGANIZATION | 0.52+ |
the silver | QUANTITY | 0.5+ |
con | LOCATION | 0.37+ |
Show Wrap with DR
(upbeat music) >> Okay, we're back here in theCUBE, this is day three of our coverage right here in the middle of all the action of Cloud City at Mobile World Congress. This is the hit of the entire show in Barcelona, not only in person, but out on the interwebs virtually, this is a hybrid event. This is back to real life, and theCUBE is here. I'm John Furrier and Dave Vellante and DR is here, Danielle Royston. >> Totally. >> Welcome back to theCUBE for the fourth time now at the anchor desk, coming back, we love you. >> Well, it's been a busy day, it's been a busy week. It's been an awesome week. >> John: Feeling good? >> Oh my God. >> You made the call. >> I've made the call. >> You did on your podcast what, months ago. >> Yeah, right? >> You made the call. >> Made the call. >> You're on the right side of history. >> Right, and people were like, it's going to be canceled. COVID won't be handled, blahbity blah. >> She's crazy. >> Nope, I was just crazy, I'm okay with that, right? >> Crazy good. >> Right, I'm like I'm forward looking in a lot of ways. And we were looking towards June and we're like, I think this is going to be the first event back. >> You know, the crazy ones commercial that Apple ran is one of the best commercials of all time. You can't ignore the crazy ones in a good way. You can't ignore what you're doing. And I think to me, what I'm so excited about is cause we've been covering cloud we're cloud bigots, we love the cloud, public cloud. We've been on that train from day one. But when you hear the interviews we did here in theCUBE and interviews that we talked about with the top people, Google, Amazon Web Services. We're talking about the top people, both technology leaders like Bill Vass and the people who run the telecom verticals like Alfonzo, Adolfo, I mean, Hernandez. We had Google's top networking executive, we had their industry leader and the telecom, Microsoft and the Silicon all are validating, and it's like, surround sound to what you're saying here, and it cannot be ignored. >> I mean, we are coming to a big moment in Telco, right? And I mean, I've been saying it's coming. I called 2021, the year of Public Cloud and Telco. It helped that Erickson bailed. So thank you, Erickson people. >> It was a gift. >> It was a gift. >> It was. >> It really was a gift. And it was not just for me, but I think also for the vendors in the booth, I mean, we have a Cloud City army, right? Here we go, let's start marching, and it's awesome. >> He reminds me of that baseball player that took a break, cause he had a hangover and, Cal Ripkin. >> Cal Ripkin? >> Yeah, what was that guy's name? >> Did that really happen? >> Yeah, he took a break and uh- >> New guy stepped in. >> Yeah, and so well, not Cal Ripkin. >> No, no, so before, you want to know, who was it, Lou Gehrig? >> Lou Gehrig, yeah, Lou Gehrig. >> Right, so, Lou Gehrig was nobody, and we can't remember the guy's name, nobody knows the guy's name, what was that guy's name? Nobody knows, oh, there's Lou Gehrig, he got hurt. He sat out and Lou Gehrig replaced him and never hear of him again. >> Danielle: Love it, I'll take that. >> Never, never missed a game for his entire career. So again, this is what Erickson did, they just okay, take a break. >> Yeah, but I mean, it's been great again. I had a great day yesterday, my keynote was delivered. Things are going well with the booth, we had Jon Bon Jovi. I mean, that was just epic and it was acoustic and it was right after lockdown. I think everyone was really excited to be there. But I was talking to a vendor that said we'd been able to accomplish in three days, what normally it would take three years from a sales funnel perspective. I mean, that's big and that's not me. That's not my organization. That's other organizations that are benefiting from this energy. Oh, it's awesome. >> The post isolation economy has become a living metaphor for transformation, and I've been trying to sort of grok and put the pieces together as to how this thing progresses in my interview with Portal One in particular really brought it into focus for me, anyway, I'd love to get your thoughts. One of the things we haven't talked much about is public policy, and I think about all the time, all the discussion in the United States about infrastructure, this is critical infrastructure, right? And the spectrum is a country like South Africa saying, come on in, we want to open up. We want to innovate, to me, that's the model for these tier two and tier three Telcos that are just going to disrupt the big guys, whereas, maybe China's maybe on the other end of the spectrum, very controlling, but it's the former that is going to adopt the cloud sooner, and it's going to completely transform the next decade. >> Yeah, I think this is a great technology for a smaller challenge or CSP that still is a large successful company to challenge the incumbents that are, they are dinosaurs too, they move a little bit slow, and maybe if you're a little bit faster, quicker dinosaur you'll survive longer, maybe you'll be able to transform and, and a public cloud enables that. And I think, you know I'm playing the long game here, right? Is public cloud already for every Telco in every corner of the world, no. And there's a couple of things that are barriers to that. We don't really talk about the downsides, and so maybe we sort of wrap up with- there are challenges and acknowledge there are challenges, you know, in some cases their data regulations and issues, right? And you can't right? There's not a hyperscaler in your country, right? And so you're having a little bit of challenges, but you trend this out over 10 years and then pace it with the hyperscalers that are building new data centers. They're each at 25 plus each, you know, plus or minus a few, right? They're marching along, and you trend this out over 10 years, I think one of two things happened, your data regulations are eased or a hyperscaler appears in a place you can use it, and those points converge and hopefully the software's there, and that's my effort and (claps) yeah. >> Dave: You know what's an interesting trend, DR and John, that is maybe a harbinger to this, is you just mentioned something. If the hyperscalers might not have a presence in, in a country, you know what they're doing? And our data shows this, I do that weekly series breaking analysis and the data Openstack was popping up. Like where does OpenStack come from, well, guess what, when you cut the data, it was Telcos using open source to build clouds in regions where there was no hyperscalers. >> It's a gap filler. >> Yeah, it's a gap filler, it's a bandaid. >> But I think this is where, like. outpost is such a great idea, right? Like getting outposts, and I think Microsoft has the ability to do this as well, Google less so, right? They're not providing the staff, they're doing Anthos. So you're still managing this, the rack, but they're giving you the ability to tap into their services. But I was talking to a CTO in Bolivia. He was like, we have data privacy issues in our country. There's no hyperscaler, not sure Bolivia is like next on the list for AWS, right? But he's like, I'm going to build my own public cloud. And I'm like why would you do that when you can just use outposts? And then when your data regulations release, where they get to Bolivia, you can switch and you're on the stack, and you're ready to go. I think that's what you should do. You should totally do that. >> John: Yeah, one of the things that's come up on here in the interviews, in theCUBE and here, the show is that there are risk takers and innovators and there's operators. And this has been the consistent theme around, yeah, the on-premises world you mentioned this regulation reasons, and or some workflows just have to be on premise for security reasons, whatever, that's the corner case. But the operating model of the technology architecture is shifted. And that reality, I don't think is debatable, so I find it, I got to ask you this because I'm really curious. I know you get a lot of people staring at ya, oh the public cloud's just a hosting, but why aren't people getting this architectural shift? I mean, you mentioned outpost and wavelength, which Amazon has, is a game changer. It's Amazon cloud at the hub. >> Yeah, at the edge. >> Okay, that's a low latency, again, low-hanging fruit applications, real buys, whatnot. I mean, that's an architectural dot that's been connected. Why are people getting it. >> In our industry, I think it is a lot of not invented here syndrome, right? And that's a very sort of nineties thought and I have been advocating stand on the shoulders of the greatest technologists in the world, right, and you know, there's, there is a geopolitical US thing, I think we lived through a presidency that had a sort of nationalistic approach and a lot of those conversations pop up, but I've also looked to these guys and I'm like, you're still, you still have your Huawei kit installed. And there's concerns with that too. So, and you picked it because of cost, and it's really hard to switch off of, so give me a break with your public cloud USA stuff, right? You can use it, you're just making excuses, you're just afraid. What are you afraid of, the HR implications? Let's talk about that, right? And the minute I take it there, conversation changes. >> Yeah, I talked to Teresa Carlson when she was running the public sector at AWS, she's now president of Splunk. I call her a Renaissance woman. She's been a great leader and public sector for this weird little pocket of AWS where it's a guess a sales division, but it's still its own company. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> And she's, did the CIA deal, the DOD, and the public sector partnerships are now private, a lot more private relationships, So it's not like just governments, you mentioned government and national security, and these things, you started to see the ecosystem not, not just be about companies, >> Danielle: Yeah. >> Government and private sector. So this whole vibe of the telecom being regulated, unregulated, unbundled is an interesting kind of theory. What's your thoughts and reactions to this, kind of this, melting pot of ecosystem change and evolution? >> Danielle: Yeah, I mean. I think there's a very nationalistic approach by the Telcos, right? They sort of think about the countries that they operate in. There's a couple of groups that go across multiple countries, but can there be a global Telco? Can that happen, right? Just like we say, you were saying it earlier, Netflix, right? You can say Netflix, UK. Right, and so can we have a global Telco, right. That is challenging on a lot of different levels. But think about that in a public cloud start to enable that idea, right? Elon Musk is going to get to Mars. You need a planetary level Telco. And I can, I think that day is, I mean, I don't think it's tomorrow, but I think that's like 10, 20 years away. >> Dave: You're done, we're going to see it start this decade, it's already starting. We're going to see the fruits of that dividend. >> Danielle: Yeah, it's crazy. >> I've got to ask you, you're a student of the industry and you get so much experience, it's great to have you on theCUBE and chat about, riff about these things, but, the classic who's ready for disruption question comes up, and I think there's no doubt that the Telcos as an industry has been slow moving and the role and the importance has changed. People need the need to have the internet access they need to access. >> Yeah. >> So, and you've got the edge, now applications are now running on it, since the iPhone 14 years ago, as you pointed out, people now are interested in how packets move. That's fast whether it's a doctor or an emergency worker or someone. >> Danielle: What we have done in 2020 without the internet and broadband and our mobile phones, I mean? >> You know, I think about 1920 when the Spanish flu pandemic hit a hundred years ago, those guys did not have mobile phones and they must have been bored, right? I mean, what are you going to do, right? And so, yeah I think last year really moved a lot of thinking forward in this respect, so. >> Yeah, it's always like that, that animal out in the Serengeti that gets taken down, you know, by the cheetah or the lion. How do know when someone is going to be disrupted What's the, what's the tell sign in your mind, you look at the Telco landscape. What is someone waiting to be disrupted or replaced like? >> You know what they're ostriches, how do you say that word, right? They stick their head in the sand. Like I don't want to talk about it, la la la, I don't want to, I don't want to think about it. You know, they bring up all these like roadblocks, and I'm like, okay, I'm going to come visit you in another six months to a year, and let's see what happens when the guys that are moving fast that are open-minded to this, and it's, I mean, when you start to use the public cloud, you don't, like, turn it on overnight. You start experimenting, right? You start, you take an application that is non-threatening. You have, I mean, these guys are running thousands of apps inside their data centers. Pick some boring ones, pick some old ones that no one likes, and move that to the public cloud, play with it. Right, I'm not talking about moving a whole network overnight tomorrow. You got to learn, you have no, I mean, very little talent in the Telco that know how to program against the AWS stack. Start hiring, start doing it, and you're going to start to learn about the compensation, and I used to do compensation, right? I spent a lot of time in HR, right? The compensation points and structures, they compare AWS and Google, versus a Telco. Do you want Telco stock? Do you want Google stock? >> Dave: Right, where do you want to go? >> Right, right? like that's going to challenge the HR organization in terms of compensate. How do we compensate our people when they're learning these new valuable skills? >> When you think about disruption, you know, the master or the professor of disruption, Clay Christensen, one of the best lectures he ever gave was who at Cambridge, and he gave a lecture on the steel industry, and he was describing it, it was like four layers of value in the steel industry, the value chain, it started with rebar, like the lowest end, right? >> Danielle: Yeah yeah. >> And the Telco's actually the opposite, so that, you know, when, when the international companies came in, they went after rebar, and the higher end steel companies said, nah, let them have it, that's the low margin stuff. And then eventually, uh, when they got up to the high end. >> Danielle: It was over, yeah. >> The Telcos are the opposite. They're like, the, you know, in the, in the conductivity and they're hanging on to that because it's so big, but all the high value stuff, it's already gone to the, over the top players, right. >> It's being eaten away, and I'm like, what is going to wake you guys up to realize those are your competitors, that's where the battle is, right? >> John: That's really where the value is. >> The battle of the bastards, you're there by yourself, like "Game of Thrones" and they're coming at you. >> John: You need a dragon. >> What are you doing about it? >> John: I need a dragon to compete in this market. Riding a dragon would be a good strategy. >> I know, I was just watching. Cause I have a podcast, I have a podcast called "Telco In 20" and we always put like little nuggets in the show notes, I personally reviewed them, I was just reviewing the one for the keynote that we're putting out, and I had a dragon in my keynote, right? It was a really great moment, it was really fun to do, but there's, I don't know if you guys are "Game of Thrones" fans. >> Yeah. >> Sure. >> Right, but there's a great moment when Daenerys gets her dragons, the baby dragons, and she takes over the Unsullied Army, right? And it's just this, right? Like all of a sudden the tables turn in an instant where she has nothing, and she's like on her quest, right. I'm on a quest. >> Dave: Comes out of the fire. >> Right, comes out of the fire, the unburnt, right? She has her dragons, right? She has them hatch. She takes over the Unsullied Army, right? Slaves, it starts her march, right? And I'm like, we're putting that clip into the show notes because I think that's where we are. I think I've hatched some dragons, right? The Cloud City army, let's go, let's go take on Telco. >> John: Well, I mean, this to me. >> Easy. >> It definitely have made, made it happen because I heard many people talking about cloud, this is turning into a cloud show. The question is, when does this going to be a cloud show? That's just Cloud City, it's a big section of the show. I mean, all the big players are behind it. >> Danielle: Yeah, yeah. >> Amazon Web Services, Google Azure, Ecosystem, startups, thinking differently, but everyone's agreeing why aren't we doing this? >> I think, like I said, I mean, people are like, you're such a visionary, and how did, why do you think this will work, I'm like, it's worked in every other industry. Am I really that visionary, and like, these are the three best tech companies in the world, like, are, are you kidding me? And so I think we've shown the momentum here. I think we're looking forward to 2022, you know? And that we see 2022, you got to start planning this the minute we get back, right? Like I wouldn't recommend doing this in a hundred days again, that was a very painful, but you know, February, I was, there's a sign inside NWC, February 28th. Right, we're talking seven months. You got to get going now. >> John: Let's get on the phone. >> With Telco, I mean, I think you're right on. I mean, you know, remember Skype, in the early days, right? >> Danielle: Yeah, yeah. >> It wasn't regional. It was just, plug into the internet. >> Danielle: It was just Skype, it was just WhatsApp. >> Well this is a great location, if you can get a shot guys of the people behind us, I don't know if you can, if you're watching check out the scene here, It's winding down, a lot of people having happy hour. Now this is a social construct here at Cloud City, not only is it chock full of information, reporting that we're doing and getting all the data and with the presentations on the main stage, with Adam and the studio and the team, this is a place where people are meeting and there's deals being done face to face, intimate relationships, the best of the best are here, they make the trek. So there's been a successful formula. Of course theCUBE is in the middle of all the action, which we love, we're psyched to be back. I want to thank you personally, while we have you on stage here. >> I want to thank you guys, and the crew, the crew has been amazing, turning out videos on short order. We have all these crews in different cities, it's, our own show has been virtual. You know, Adam's in Bristol, right? We're here, this was an experiment, we talked about this a hundred days ago, 90 days ago. Could we get theCUBE there, do the show but also theCUBE. >> You are a visionary, you said made for TV hybrid event with your team, produce television shows, theCUBE, we're digital, we love you guys, great alignment, but it's magical because the content doesn't end here, the show might end, they might break down the beautiful plants and the exhibits, but the community is going to continue, the content and the conversations. >> Yeah. >> So, we were looking forward to it and- >> I'm super glad, super glad we did this. >> Awesome, well, any final moments that you would like to share in the last two minutes we have, favorite moments, observations, funny things that have happened to you, weird things that have happened to you, share something that people might not know, or a favorite moment? >> I think, I don't know that people know, we have a 3D printer in the coffee shops, and so you can upload any picture and they're 3d printing, coffee art, right? So I've been seeing lots of social posts around people uploading their, their logos and things like that. I think Jon Bon Jovi, he was super thankful to be back. He thanked me personally two different times of like, I'm just glad to be out in front of people. And I think just even just the people walking around, thank you for being brave, thank you for coming back. You've helped Barcelona and we're happy to be together. Even if it is with masks, it's hard to do business with masks on, everyone's happy and psyched. >> John: Well the one thing that people cannot do relative to you is they cannot ignore you. You are making a great big wave. >> Danielle: I shout pretty loud, It's kind of hard to ignore me. >> You're making a great big wave, you're on the right side, we believe, of history, public cloud is driving the bus down main street of Cloud City, and if people don't get out of the way, they will be under the bus. >> I'm, like I said, in my keynote, it's go time let's do it. >> Okay. Thank you so much for all your attention and mission behind the cloud and the success. >> Danielle: We'll do it again. We're going to do it again soon. >> After Togi's a hundred million dollar investment, you're the CEO of Togi that, let's follow that progress, and of course, Telco DR, Danielle Royston, the digital revolution. Thanks for coming on with you. >> Thank you guys, it was super fun. >> This is theCUBE I'm John Furrier with Dave Vallante, we're going to send it back to Adam in the studio. Thanks, the team here. >> Woo! (audience applauding) >> I want to thank the team, everyone here, Adam is great, Chloe. >> Great working with you guys. >> Awesome, and what a great crew. >> So great. >> Thank you everybody. That's it for theCUBE, here on the last day, Wednesday of theCUBE, stay tuned for tomorrow more action on the main stage, here in Cloud City. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
This is the hit of the for the fourth time now Well, it's been a busy You did on your Right, and people were like, I think this is going to and the people who run the I called 2021, the year I mean, we have a Cloud City army, right? He reminds me of that baseball nobody knows the guy's name, So again, this is what Erickson did, I mean, that was just One of the things we haven't in every corner of the world, no. and the data Openstack was popping up. Yeah, it's a gap I think that's what you should do. I got to ask you this I mean, that's an architectural And the minute I take it Yeah, I talked to Teresa Carlson and reactions to this, by the Telcos, right? We're going to see the and the role and the since the iPhone 14 years I mean, what are you going to do, right? that animal out in the and it's, I mean, when you challenge the HR organization and the higher end steel The Telcos are the opposite. The battle of the bastards, to compete in this market. the one for the keynote and she takes over the Right, comes out of the I mean, all the big players are behind it. the minute we get back, right? I mean, you know, remember Skype, It was just, plug into the internet. Danielle: It was just and getting all the data I want to thank you guys, and the crew, but the community is going to continue, and so you can upload any picture John: Well the one It's kind of hard to ignore me. don't get out of the way, I'm, like I said, in my and mission behind the We're going to do it again soon. Danielle Royston, the digital revolution. Thanks, the team here. I want to thank the on the main stage, here in Cloud City.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Danielle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Danielle Royston | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bolivia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Bill Vass | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Clay Christensen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vallante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chloe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
February 28th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Teresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon Bon Jovi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lou Gehrig | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Game of Thrones | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Bristol | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Elon Musk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
February | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cal Ripkin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Skype | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
25 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Serengeti | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Huawei | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mars | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Show Wrap with DR
(upbeat music) >> Hey, we're back here in theCube. This is day three of our coverage right here in the middle of all the action of Cloud City at Mobile World Congress. This is the hit of the entire show in Barcelona, not only in person, but out on the interwebs virtually. This is a hybrid event. This is back to real life, and theCube is here. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante and D. R. is here, Danielle Royston. >> Totally. >> Welcome back to theCube for fourth time. now at the anchor desk, coming back. >> I don't know. It's been a busy day. It's been a busy week. It's been an awesome week. >> Dave: Feeling good? >> Oh, my god. >> You made the call. >> I made the call. You finished your podcast, what months ago? >> Yeah. >> Made the call. >> Made the call. You're on the right side of history. >> Right? And people were like, "It's going to be canceled. COVID won't be handled." Blahbity blah. >> She's crazy. >> And I'm like, nope. She's crazy. I'm okay with that. Right? But I'm like... >> Crazy good. >> Right, I'm like, I'm forward-looking in a lot of ways. And we were looking towards June, and we're like, "I think this is going to be the first event back. We're going to be able to do it." >> You know, the crazy one's commercial that Apple ran, probably one of the best commercials of all time. You can't ignore the crazy ones in a good way. You can't ignore what you're doing. And I think to me, what I'm so excited about is, 'cause we've been covering cloud. We're cloud bigots. We love the cloud, public cloud. We've been on that train from day one. But when you hear the interviews we did here on theCube and interviews that we talked about with the top people, Google, Amazon Web Services. We're talking about the top people, both technology leaders like Bill Vass and the people who run the Telecom Verticals like Alf, Alfonzo. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> Adolfo, I mean, Hernandez. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> We had Google's top networking executive. We had their industry leader in the telecom, Microsoft, and the Silicon. All are validating, and it's like surround sound to what you're saying here. And it cannot be ignored. >> I mean, we are coming to a big moment in Telco, right? And I mean, I've been saying that it's coming. I called 2021, the year of public cloud and Telco. It helped that Ericcson bailed. So thank you, Ericcson people. >> Dave: It was a gift. >> It was a gift. >> John: It really was. >> It really was a gift. And it was not just for me, but I think also for the vendors in the booth. I mean, we have a Cloud City army, right? Here we go. Let's start marching. And it's awesome. >> He reminds me of that baseball player that took a break 'cause he had a hangover and Cal Ripken. >> Cal Ripken, right, yeah, yeah. What was that guy's name? >> Did it really happen? >> Yeah, he took a break and... >> The new guy stepped in? >> Yeah, and so we'll go to Cal Ripken. >> No, no, so before it was it? Lou Gehrig. >> Lou Gehrig, yeah. >> Right, so Lou Gehrig was nobody. And we can't remember the guy's name. Nobody knows the guy's name. >> Danielle: Yeah, yeah. >> What was that guy's name? Nobody knows. Oh, 'cause Lou Garrett, he got hurt. >> Danielle: And Lou Gehrig stepped in. >> He sat out, and Lou Gehrig replaced him. >> Danielle: Love it. >> And never heard of him again. >> Danielle: I'll take that. >> Never missed a game. Never missed a game for his entire career. So again, this is what Ericcson did. They just okay, take a break and... >> But I mean, it's been great. Again, I had a great day yesterday. My keynote was delivered. Things are going well with the booth. We had Jon Bon Jovi. I mean, that was just epic, and it was acoustic, and it was right after lockdown. I think everyone was really excited to be there. But I was talking to a vendor that said we'd been able to accomplish in three days what normally it would take three years from a sales funnel perspective. I mean, that is, that's big, and that's not me. That's not my organization. That's other organizations that are benefiting from this energy. Oh, that's awesome. >> The post-isolation economy has become a living metaphor for transformation. And I've been trying to sort of grok and put the pieces together as to how this thing progresses. And my interview with Portaone, in particular, >> Danielle: Yeah. >> really brought it into focus for me, anyway. I'd love to get your thoughts. One of the things we haven't talked much about is public policy. And I think about all the time, all the discussion in the United States about infrastructure, this is critical infrastructure, right? >> Danielle: Yeah. >> And the spectrum is a country like South Africa saying, "Come on in. We want to open up." >> Danielle: Yeah. >> "We want to innovate." And to me that's to me, that's the model for these tier two and tier three telcos that are just going to disrupt the big guys. Whereas, you know, China, may be using the other end of the spectrum, very controlling, but it's the former that is going to adopt the cloud sooner. It's going to completely transform the next decade. >> Yeah, I think this is a great technology for a smaller challenger CSP that still is a large successful company to challenge the incumbents that are, they are dinosaurs too. They move a little bit slow. And maybe if you're a little bit faster, quicker dinosaur you'll survive longer. Maybe it will be able to transform and a public cloud enables that. And I think, you know, I'm playing the long game here, right? >> Dave: Yeah. >> Is public cloud ready for every telco in every corner of the world? No. And there's a couple of things that are barriers to that. We don't really talk about the downsides, and so maybe we sort of wrap up with, there are challenges, and I acknowledge there are challenges. You know, in some cases there are data regulations and issues, right? And you can't, right? There's not a hyperscaler in your country, right? And so you're having a little bit of challenges, but you trend this out over 10 years and then pace it with the hyperscalers are building new data centers. They're each at 25 plus each, plus or minus a few, right? They're marching along, and you trend this out over 10 years, I think one of two things happens. Your data regulations are eased or you a hyperscaler appears in a place you can use it. And those points converge, and hopefully the software's there, and that's my effort. And, yeah. >> You know what's an interesting trend, D. R., John? That is maybe a harbinger to this. You just mentioned something. If the hyperscalers might not have a presence in a country, you know what they're doing? And our data shows this, I do that weekly series "Breaking Analysis," and the data, OpenStack was popping up. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> Like where does OpenStack come from? Well, guess what. When you cut the data, it was telcos using open source to build clouds in regions where there was no hyperscaler. >> Where it didn't exist, yeah. >> So it's a-- >> Gap-filler. >> Yeah, it's a gap-filler. It's a Band-aid. >> But I think this is where like Outpost is such a great idea, right? Like getting Outposts, and I think Microsoft has the ability to do this as well, Google less so, right. They're not providing the staff. They're doing Anthos, so you're still managing this, the rack, but they're giving you the ability to tap into those services. But I was talking to a CE, a CTO in Bolivia. He was like, "We have data privacy issues in our country. There's no hyperscaler." Not sure Bolivia is like next on the list for AWS, right? But he's like, "I'm going to build my own public cloud." And I'm like, "Why would you do that when you can just use Outposts?" And then when your data regulations release or there's a, they get to Bolivia, you can switch and you're on the stack and you're ready to go. I think that's what you should do. You should totally do that. >> Yeah, and one of the things that's come up here on the interviews and theCube and here, the show, is that there are risk takers and innovators and there's operators. And this has been the consistent theme around, yeah, the on-premises world. You mentioned this regulation reasons and/or some workflows just have to be on premise for security reasons, whatever. That's the corner case. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> But the operating model of the technology architecture is shifted. >> Danielle: Yep. >> And that reality, I don't think, is debatable. So I find it. I've got to ask you this because I'm really curious. I know you get a lot of people steering 'ya, oh the public cloud's just a hosting, but why aren't people getting this architectural shift? I mean, you mentioned Outpost, and Wavelength, which Amazon has, is a game changer. It's Amazon Cloud at the hub. >> Yeah, at the edge, yeah. >> Okay, that's a low latency again, low-hanging fruit applications, robotics, whatnot. I mean, that's an architectural dot that's been connected. >> Yeah. >> Why aren't people getting it? >> In our industry, I think it is a lot of not invented here syndrome, right? And that's a very sort of nineties thought, and I have been advocating stand on the shoulders of the greatest technologists in the world. Right? And you know, there is a geopolitical US thing. I think we lived through a presidency that had a sort of nationalistic approach and a lot of those conversations pop up, but I've also looked to these guys and I'm like, you still have your Huawei kit installed, and there's concerns with that, too. So, and you picked it because of cost. And it's really hard to switch off of. >> John: Yeah. >> So give me a break with your public cloud USA stuff, right? You can use it. You're just making excuses. You're just afraid. What are you afraid of? The HR implications? Let's talk about that, right? And the minute I take it there, conversation changes. >> I talked to Teresa Carlson when she was running the public sector at AWS. She's now president of Splunk. I call her a Renaissance woman. She's been a great leader. In public sector there's been this weird little pocket of AWS where it's, I guess, a sales division, but it's still its own company. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> And she just did the CIA deal. The DOD and the public sector partnerships are now private, a lot more private relationships. So it's not like just governments. You mentioned government and national security and these things. You start to see the ecosystem, not, not just be about companies, government and private sector. So this whole vibe of the telecomm being regulated, unregulated, unbundled is an interesting kind of theory. What's your thoughts and reactions to this kind melting pot of ecosystem change and evolution? >> Yeah, I mean, I think there's a very nationalistic approach by the telcos, right? They sort of think about the countries that they operate in. There's a couple of groups that go across multiple countries, but can there be a global telco? Can that happen, right? Just like we say, you were saying it earlier, Netflix. Right? You didn't say Netflix, UK, right? And so can we have a global telco, right? That is challenging on a lot of different levels. But think about that in a public cloud starts to enable that idea. Right? Elon Musk is going to get Mars. >> Dave: Yep. >> John: Yeah. >> You need a planetary level telco, and I think that day is, I mean, I don't think it's tomorrow, but I think that's like 10, 20 years away. >> You're done. We're going to see it start this decade. It's already starting. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> But we're going to see the fruits of that dividend. >> Danielle: Right, yeah. >> I got to ask you. You're a student of the industry and you got so much experience. It's great to have you on theCube and chat about, riff about, these things, but the the classic "Who's ready for disruption?" question comes up. And I think there's no doubt that the telcos, as an industry, has been slow moving, and the role and the importance has changed. People need the need to have the internet access. They need to access. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> So and you've got the Edge. Now applications are now running on a, since the iPhone 14 years ago, as you pointed out, people now are interested in how packets move. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> That's fast, whether it's a doctor or an emergency worker or someone. >> What would we have done in 2020 without the internet and broadband and our mobile phones? I mean. >> Dave: We would have been miserable. >> You know, I think about 1920 when the Spanish flu pandemic hit a hundred years ago. Those guys did not have mobile phones, and they must have been bored, right? I mean, what are you going to do? Right? And so, yeah, I think, I think last year really moved a lot of thinking forward in this respect, so. >> Yeah, it's always like that animal out in the Serengeti that gets taken down, you know, by the cheetah or the lion. How do you know when someone is going to be disrupted? What's the, what's the tell sign in your mind? You look at the telco landscape, what is someone waiting to be disrupted or replaced look like? >> Know what? They're ostriches. Ostriches, how do you say that word right? They stick their head in the sand. Like they don't want to talk about it. La, la, la, I don't want to. I don't want to think about it. You know, they bring up all these like roadblocks, and I'm like, okay, I'm going to come visit you in another six months to a year, and let's see what happens when the guys that are moving fast that are open-minded to this. And it's, I mean, when you start to use the public cloud, you don't like turn it on overnight. You start experimenting, right? You start. You take an application that is non-threatening. You have, I mean, these guys are running thousands of apps inside their data centers. Pick some boring ones. Pick some old ones that no one likes. Move that to the public cloud. Play with it, right? I'm not talking about moving your whole network overnight tomorrow. You got to learn. You have no, I mean, very little talent in the telco that know how to program against the AWS stack. Start hiring. Start doing it. And you're going to start to learn about the compensation. And I used to do compensation, right? I spent a lot of time in HR, right? The compensation points and structures, and they can bear AWS and Google versus a telco. You want Telco stock? Do you want Google stock? >> John: Right, where do you want to go? >> Right? Right? And so you need to start. Like that's going to challenge the HR organization in terms of compensate. How do we compensate our people when they're learning these new, valuable skills? >> When you think about disruption, you know, the master or the professor of disruption, Clay Christensen, one of the best lectures he ever gave is we were at Cambridge, and he gave a lecture on the steel industry and he was describing it. It was like four layers of value in the steel industry, the value chain. It started with rebar, like the lowest end. Right? >> Danielle: Yeah, yeah. >> And the telco's actually the opposite. So, you know, when the international companies came in, they went after rebar, and the higher end steel companies said, "Nah, let them have it." >> Danielle: Let it go. >> "That's the low margin stuff." And then eventually when they got up to the high end, they all got killed. >> Danielle: It was over, yeah. >> The telcos are the opposite. They're like, you know, in the connectivity, and they're hanging on to that because it's so big, but all the high value stuff, it's already gone to the over-the-top players, right? >> It's being eaten away. And I'm like, "What is going to wake you guys up to realize those are your competitors?" That's where the battle is, right? >> Dave: That's really where the value is. >> The battle of the bastards. You're there by yourself, the Game of Thrones, and they're coming at you. >> John: You need a dragon. >> What are you doing about it? >> I need a dragon. I need a dragon to compete in this market. Riding on the dragon would be a good strategy. >> I know. I was just watching. 'Cause I have a podcast. I have a podcast called "Telco in 20," and we always put like little nuggets in the show notes. I personally review them. I was just reviewing the one for the keynote that we're putting out. And I had a dragon in my keynote, right? It was a really great moment. It was really fun to do. But there's, I don't know if you guys are Game of Thrones fans. >> Dave: Oh, yeah. >> John: For sure. >> Right? But there's a great moment when Daenerys guts her dragons, the baby dragons, and she takes over the Unsullied Army. Right? And it's just this, right? Like all of a sudden, the tables turn in an instant where she has nothing, and she's like on her quest, right? I'm on a quest. >> John: Comes out of the fire. >> Right, comes out of the fire. The unburnt, right? She has her dragons, right? She has them hatch. She takes over the Unsullied Army, right? Slays and starts her march, right? And I'm like, we're putting that clip into the show notes because I think that's where we are. I think I've hatched some dragons, right? The Cloud City Army, let's go, let's go take on Telco. >> John: Well, I mean to me... >> Easy. >> I definitely have made it happen because I heard many people talking about cloud. This is turning into a cloud show. The question is, when does this be, going to be a cloud show? You know it's just Cloud City is a big section of the show. I mean, all the big players are behind it. >> Danielle: Yeah, yeah. >> Amazon Web Services, Google, Azure, Ecosystem, startups thinking differently, but everyone's agreeing, "Why aren't we doing this?" >> I think, like I said, I mean, people are like, you're such a visionary. And how did, why do you think this will work? I'm like, it's worked in every other industry. Am I really that visionary? And like, these are the three best tech companies in the world. Like, are you kidding me? And so I think we've shown the momentum here. I think we're looking forward to 2022, you know? And do we see 2022, you get to start planning this the minute we get back. Right? >> John: Yeah. >> Like I wouldn't recommend doing this in a hundred days again. That was a very painful, but you know, February, I was, there's a sign inside NWC, February 28th, right? We're talking seven months. You got to get going now. >> John: Let's get on the phone. (John and Dave talking at the same time) >> I mean, I think you're right on. I mean, you know, remember Skype in the early days? >> Danielle: Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. >> It wasn't regional. >> Danielle: Yeah. >> It was just plug into the internet, right? >> Danielle: It was just Skype. It was just WhatsApp. >> Well, this great location, and if you can get a shot, guys, of the people behind us. I don't know if you can. If you're watching, check out the scene here. It's winding down. A lot of people having happy hour now. This is a social construct here at Cloud City. Not only is it chock full of information, reporting that we're doing and getting all the data and with the presentations on the main stage with Adam and the studio and the team. This is a place where people are meeting and there's deals being done face to face, intimate relationships. The best of the best are here. They make the trek, so there's been a successful formula. Of course theCube is in the middle of all the action, which we love. We're excited to be back. I want to thank you personally while we have you on stage here. >> I want to thank you guys and the crew. The crew has been amazing turning out videos on short order. We have all these crews in different cities. It's our own show has been virtual. You know, Adam's at Bristol, right? We're here. This was an experiment. We talked about this a hundred days ago, 90 days ago. Could we get theCube there and do the show, but also theCube. >> You are a visionary. And you said, made for TV hybrid event with your team, reduced television shows, theCube. We're digital. We love you guys. Great alignment, but it's magical because the content doesn't end here. The show might end. They might break down the beautiful plants and the exhibits, but the community is going to continue. The content and the conversations. >> Yeah. >> So. >> We are looking forward to it and. >> Yeah, super-glad, super-glad we did this. >> Awesome. Well, any final moments that you would like to share? And the last two minutes we have, favorite moments, observations, funny things that have happened to you, weird things that have happened to you. Share something that people might not know or a favorite moment. >> I think, I mean I don't know that people know we have a 3D printer in the coffee shops, and so you can upload any picture, and there are three 3D printing coffee art, right? So I've been seeing lots of social posts around people uploading their, their logos and things like that. I think Jon Bon Jovi, he was super-thankful to be back. He thanked me personally two different times of like, I'm just glad to be out in front of people. And I think just even just the people walking around, thank you for being brave, thank you for coming back. You've helped Barcelona, and we're happy to be together even if it is with masks. It's hard to do business with masks on. Everyone's happy and psyched. >> The one thing that people cannot do relative to you is they cannot ignore you. You are making a great big waves. >> Danielle: I shout pretty loud. It's kind of hard to ignore me. >> Okay, you're making a great big wave. You're on the right side, we believe, of history. Public cloud is driving the bus down main street of Cloud City, and if people don't get out of the way, they will be under the bus. >> And like I said, in my keynote, it's go time. Let's do it. >> Okay, thank you so much for all your tension and mission behind the cloud and the success of... >> Danielle: We'll do it again. We're going to do it again soon. >> Ketogi's hundred million dollar investment. Be the CEO of Togi as we follow that progress. And of course, Telco D. R. Danielle Royston, the digital revolution. Thanks for coming on theCube. >> Thank you, guys. It was super-fun. Thank you so much. >> This is theCube. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante. We're going to send it back to Adam in the studio. Thanks the team here. (Danielle clapping and cheering) I want to thank the team, everyone here. Adam is great. Chloe, great working with you guys. Awesome. And what a great crew. >> So great. >> Thank you everybody. That's it for theCube here on the last day, Wednesday, of theCube. Stay tuned for tomorrow, more action on the main stage here in Cloud City. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
This is the hit of the now at the anchor desk, coming back. I don't know. I made the call. You're on the right side of history. "It's going to be canceled. And I'm like, nope. be the first event back. And I think to me, what Microsoft, and the Silicon. I called 2021, the year I mean, we have a Cloud City army, right? He reminds me of that What was that guy's name? No, no, so before it was it? Nobody knows the guy's name. What was that guy's name? He sat out, and Lou So again, this is what Ericcson did. I mean, that was just epic, and put the pieces together as One of the things we And the spectrum is a country end of the spectrum, And I think, you know, and hopefully the software's there, and the data, OpenStack was popping up. When you cut the data, Yeah, it's a gap-filler. I think that's what you should do. Yeah, and one of the things of the technology architecture is shifted. I mean, you mentioned Outpost, I mean, that's an architectural of the greatest And the minute I take it I talked to Teresa Carlson The DOD and the public sector approach by the telcos, right? I don't think it's tomorrow, We're going to see it start this decade. the fruits of that dividend. People need the need to since the iPhone 14 years That's fast, whether it's a doctor I mean. I mean, what are you going to do? You look at the telco landscape, in the telco that know how to And so you need to start. on the steel industry And the telco's actually the opposite. "That's the low margin stuff." in the connectivity, "What is going to wake you guys up The battle of the bastards. I need a dragon to compete in this market. And I had a dragon in my keynote, right? Like all of a sudden, the that clip into the show notes I mean, all the big players are behind it. in the world. You got to get going now. (John and Dave talking at the same time) I mean, you know, remember Danielle: It was just Skype. and getting all the data I want to thank you guys and the crew. but the community is going to continue. super-glad we did this. And the last two minutes we have, And I think just even just relative to you is they cannot ignore you. It's kind of hard to ignore me. You're on the right side, And like I said, in and mission behind the We're going to do it again soon. Be the CEO of Togi as Thank you so much. Thanks the team here. more action on the main
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lou Garrett | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Danielle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Danielle Royston | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lou Gehrig | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lou Gehrig | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Teresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bolivia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
February 28th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Clay Christensen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chloe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon Bon Jovi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cal Ripken | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
D. R. | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cloud City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bill Vass | PERSON | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Game of Thrones | TITLE | 0.99+ |
February | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney, Aviatrix | AWS re:Invent 2020
>>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 sponsored by Intel, AWS, and our community partners. >>Hello, everyone. Welcome back to the cubes. Virtual coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 it's virtual this year because of the pandemic. We're not there in person and in real life, we're remote. I'm John for a year hosting the cube or the cube virtual. Um, as we continue to cover the three weeks of AWS reinvent and analyze the keynotes, we bring it in, uh, from our Cuban alumni, uh, network experts. And we have here great guest, Steve Malaney, CEO of Ava Trex, industry executive legend, former entrepreneur had done startups, um, been very, very successful with luminary and Silicon Valley, um, Palo Alto networks and the Sierra Cisco, I me, all the companies you've worked for. Um, Steve, great to see you again. >>Oh yeah. Hey awesome. Even if it's just virtual, John's great to be back in the cube. >>Okay, Steve, what's up? Am I muted? I got you. Okay. >>Gotcha. Oh, okay. I just said it's great. They're great to be back in the cube. >>I had to shut up my volume, got to love live cube TV. Um, I wanted to bring you on, because one, we've been talking with you guys and your company that you're now heading. You came off the board to take the helm of Ava tricks. You really saw the vision early on before the pandemic. We were actually, we did a hybrid event with you guys, a digital hybrid and your vision of multi-cloud and hybrid was pretty much in line with what Andy Jassy. And Amazon's now rolling out, except they're not calling it. Multi-cloud, they're just saying hybrid. But when you factor in the edge, the complexity there, you're really talking multiple environments. So I want to get your take, as you look at what Amazon has done in their announcements, they're continuing to power long. What's your analysis. What's your industry take? >>Yeah, I, I think it's, uh, you know, I think it's great. I think, you know, when we were a year ago, it was just a little over a year ago, we were at a multi-cloud conference and I think people kind of thought, wow, is multicloud something that the vendors are wanting to happen because they don't want to be killed by AWS. And you know, I mean, I saw this two years ago, I call it the Cambridge and explosion to cloud where every enterprise to we are now going to move to cloud. And they had been talking about it for six or seven years, but they didn't really mean it. And two years ago I saw they meant it and I knew what was going to happen. It was going to go multi-cloud they we're going to care about day two operations, visibility, control, security, all the things that enterprises care about. And I think, um, you know, what we've seen really over the last year is AWS and all the other cloud providers recognizing this, that the world is going multicloud. Um, and day two operations matter. You've gotta be able to operationalize this and enterprises. Can't just, it's not just about wiring it and building it up. You got do, you can operate it. And so that's, I think the thing that's really interesting is the maturity of the messaging. I would say from AWS to recognize, um, where enterprises are in their journey. >>You know, Steve, I want to just reflect on something. When I was 19 years old in my first job, uh, in New York, it was on a prime mini computer, my first exposure to the enterprise office and then went and worked for IBM and HP and others. I've been in the, around the enterprise. Let me just go back 10 years in Silicon Valley, you could literally count on one or two hands. The number of enterprise experts out there that you knew of that were out circulating that weren't retired. Um, because it went through this kind of commodity stage of outsource everything kind of down to the bone, you know, just keeping the lights on there. Wasn't really a lot of innovation in the enterprise. Now it's the hottest thing in the world. And you, and you look at what's happening with cloud. They're redefining the enterprise in Andy Jassy said to me, and I'm going to interview him, uh, later this week. And you know, he said, we're done with eyes and pads. We checked that's anything. I say anyone, but he's kind of implying that we did. I, as in pass, we're targeting global it. >>Yeah. Well, you know, >>Now enterprise is super hot and you know, it's, it's a whole nother ball game to restructuring on G >>Yeah, I mean, so I, uh, the AWS is marketing slogan, Mark. My words I'll bet you a hundred bucks within the next year is going to change. They are not going to say go build anymore. Right? Because that's what they're going to say. Go consume because no enterprise wants to build and Oh, by the way, here's the other thing that they're now also figuring out. Cause I know Andy Jassy analysis, there's a skills shortage of cloud, so they don't have the skills at the aptitude, but there's also a people shortage. It's not just the skills, it's the amount of people. They don't have the ability to go deploy this. And they're going to, you're going to need solutions like ABA tricks, abstract the way a lot of the complexities of the underlying clouds and deliver this architecture for people to be able to actually deploy. >>Where is the skill gaps in your opinion, where do you see them? >>You know, I was just talking to a customer yesterday and he said most of my, most of my team are CLI jockeys. And so for networking, that means the CLI the command line interface that a human manipulates to control the Cisco router. That's the old operational model. The model of this, these days are Terraform. You're going to infrastructure is code everything. You need scriptures. You need, you need developers that are going to be driving your infrastructure. And, and, but I can't, I can't fire all these people that I've had in my enterprise for the last 30 years. I got to bring them along. I got to bring them along and the tools and the platforms to be able to go, to go do that. >>Andy's argument and Amazon's position is we eliminate the undifferentiated heavy lifting and we have all this training and content to bring everyone along. Okay. By that. >>Well, I mean, here's, here's the thing that I think AWS and all the, all the cloud providers are figuring out is the enterprise is a different beast. You know, when you go to a company as AWS and say, Hey, you can get it as long as it's any color you want, as long as it's black. And so guess what, I'm a service. And the beautiful thing is you don't need to know anything about how we do anything and just trust me, it's all going to work that does not go over well with an enterprise because they say, I'm the guy that needs to know I will get fired. If this infrastructure goes down, you know, you saw us East one go down two weeks ago, Google had a outage to two days ago or whatever it was, shit happens. I don't know if I can say that on the cube. >>We're not going to actually see regulated at this point, but who's going to know. >>Um, and you know what? I've got to have that visibility in controls and enterprise, and I need the granular controls and the visibility to troubleshoot and the security controls and the performance controls that I used to have on prem, because I'm a regulated enterprise. I need that visibility and control. And the cloud providers just say, look, I deliver a service and I deliver it to everybody. And it's the same service. And you don't need to know that does not fly with the >>Well, certainly you're seeing more regulated industries. It used to be just public sector. I just talked with Teresa Carlson. She now took over all the industries. So FinTech is regulated. Energy is regulated. Telecom's regulated. The only thing that's not regulated is a VC and startup sectors, right? So there's a >>Well, and, and, and every, every good CIO of an enterprise knows nothing good comes from your, from your infrastructure that gets outsourced. We tried that it doesn't work. Now, maybe in 20 years, I can outsource my infrastructure if I'm the CIO of a major enterprise corporation. But right now I am not outsourcing that I have to have control. Now, am I going to leverage services and basic infrastructure from the cloud providers? Absolutely. I'm not going to build it on my own data centers. That world is over, but what I'm going to maintain is the visibility and control. >>Yeah. And that's what we heard from Verner. Vogel's around observability systems, thinking control versus observability, um, evolvable systems, things like reasoning, um, you know, these are, these are innovations, right? So, so let's get back to that builders thing, because you mentioned that earlier, I think there might be an opportunity. And I think this is where I think Jassy will either look brilliant or it might not pan out. So go big or go home moment. Can Amazon create a market for companies to say, instead of bringing along everybody, I'm going to bring along some people and hire more builders because there's rewards as spoils to be had for those builders. At this point in time, given the pandemic, it's kind of put everything on full display in terms of what to do. What's your thoughts on that? >>I think, I think outside in meaning I, I look at the customer and I, and I sit at the same side of the table as a customer. I think, what did they want? And every enterprise customer right now is building out their PRI it's just like in 1992, when they built out their private infrastructures, global infrastructure, and they did it with on-prem and data centers. I bought my stories, my compute, my networking, my MPLS, and I built my infrastructure. And it was my infrastructure. They're doing the same thing. It's just, they're architecting on top of cloud and they're doing it in a multi-cloud world because they're not going to be locked in to just one cloud. And they're going to have some applications that run better on GCP. Some have better in AWS and some on Oracle, and all of our customers are doing this. And what they want though, is a common infrastructure. That's their architecture and their infrastructure, not an AWS architecture and a Google architecture and an Azure architecture. What architecture, abstracted away above the clouds. That's my architecture. And it's common for my global network that that's what enterprises want to do. And I think each of the individual clouds are going to have to understand that they are a piece of the puzzle. They are not the puzzle. And I think you're going to have to come to that realization. >>I appreciate your expertise and insight into the commentary real quick, last 30 seconds, give a quick plug for Ava tricks. What are you guys doing? What's new cause the quick update. >>I mean, it's, it's, it's crazy just since, uh, I've been the CEO for two years and you know, the, the logos of large enterprise that we're getting right now. My, my Cambrian explosion that I saw two years ago is real, um, more executing on that strategy. It's a, who's who of logos right now. We've got 450 customers now we're, uh, exploding and more importantly, enterprises are now getting that deployment phase. They have, they're done with the architecture phase of, Hey, let me check this whole thing out in cloud. And now they're pushing the button and they're, they're accelerating, which my guess is it's not a coincidence that AWS is now talking about operations. And what Aviatrix does is, is, is, does gives that visibility and control cloud networking, but in a very cloud native way with Terraform simplicity, agility, because agility is part of mission critical infrastructure. Now can't be like it was in 1994 with a Cisco infrastructure where it said, what year do you want your, your, your infrastructure, Mr. Customer? >>Great. And the biggest thing people should pay attention to this year, uh, for around the enterprise dynamics with cloud and scale what's what should people be watching >>In your opinion? Just the continued movement of big enterprises, uh, all into cloud. The center of gravity is now into cloud and, uh, they're going to be completely running away from everything on prem. >>All right. Steven Landy, CEO of VBA tricks, a proven success entrepreneur CEO, back in the two years of the helm, the VBA tricks. Great to see you. I wish we were in person. One of our last events was your altitude event. It's on YouTube. If anyone was interested in watching, we had a great time. Steve, thank you so much for your candid commentary. Yeah. Thanks, John. Okay. I'm Jennifer with the cube. You're watching the cube virtual here on the cube. Thanks for watching..
SUMMARY :
It's the cube with digital coverage of Um, Steve, great to see you again. Even if it's just virtual, John's great to be back in the cube. I got you. They're great to be back in the cube. You came off the board to take And I think, um, you know, what we've seen really over the last year is They're redefining the enterprise in Andy Jassy said to me, and I'm going to interview him, They don't have the ability to go deploy this. And so for networking, that means the CLI and we have all this training and content to bring everyone along. And the beautiful thing is you don't need to know anything about how we do anything and just trust me, And it's the same service. I just talked with Teresa Carlson. I'm not going to build it on my own data centers. So, so let's get back to that builders thing, because you mentioned that earlier, And I think each of the individual clouds are going to have to understand What's new cause the quick update. I mean, it's, it's, it's crazy just since, uh, I've been the CEO for two years and you know, And the biggest thing people should pay attention to this year, uh, for around the enterprise dynamics with cloud Just the continued movement of big enterprises, uh, back in the two years of the helm, the VBA tricks.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Steven Landy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Malaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Teresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
1992 | DATE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Jennifer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1994 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
450 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first job | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
two hands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
seven years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aviatrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two days ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
two weeks ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Sierra Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first exposure | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Jassy | PERSON | 0.97+ |
last year | DATE | 0.97+ |
later this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
Vogel | PERSON | 0.97+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
VBA | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Verner | PERSON | 0.96+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one cloud | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.95+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
three weeks | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
19 years old | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Cuban | OTHER | 0.88+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.87+ |
Terraform | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
over | DATE | 0.82+ |
last 30 years | DATE | 0.8+ |
30 seconds | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
Alto | LOCATION | 0.78+ |
Invent | EVENT | 0.78+ |
hundred bucks | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
The University of Edinburgh and Rolls Royce Drive in Exascale Style | Exascale Day
>>welcome. My name is Ben Bennett. I am the director of HPC Strategic programs here at Hewlett Packard Enterprise. It is my great pleasure and honor to be talking to Professor Mark Parsons from the Edinburgh Parallel Computing Center. And we're gonna talk a little about exa scale. What? It means we're gonna talk less about the technology on Maura about the science, the requirements on the need for exa scale. Uh, rather than a deep dive into the enabling technologies. Mark. Welcome. >>I then thanks very much for inviting me to tell me >>complete pleasure. Um, so I'd like to kick off with, I suppose. Quite an interesting look back. You and I are both of a certain age 25 plus, Onda. We've seen these milestones. Uh, I suppose that the S I milestones of high performance computing's come and go, you know, from a gig a flop back in 1987 teraflop in 97 a petaflop in 2000 and eight. But we seem to be taking longer in getting to an ex a flop. Um, so I'd like your thoughts. Why is why is an extra flop taking so long? >>So I think that's a very interesting question because I started my career in parallel computing in 1989. I'm gonna join in. IPCC was set up then. You know, we're 30 years old this year in 1990 on Do you know the fastest computer we have them is 800 mega flops just under a getting flogged. So in my career, we've gone already. When we reached the better scale, we'd already gone pretty much a million times faster on, you know, the step from a tariff block to a block scale system really didn't feel particularly difficult. Um, on yet the step from A from a petaflop PETA scale system. To an extent, block is a really, really big challenge. And I think it's really actually related to what's happened with computer processes over the last decade, where, individually, you know, approached the core, Like on your laptop. Whoever hasn't got much faster, we've just got more often So the perception of more speed, but actually just being delivered by more course. And as you go down that approach, you know what happens in the supercomputing world as well. We've gone, uh, in 2010 I think we had systems that were, you know, a few 1000 cores. Our main national service in the UK for the last eight years has had 118,000 cores. But looking at the X scale we're looking at, you know, four or five million cores on taming that level of parallelism is the real challenge. And that's why it's taking an enormous and time to, uh, deliver these systems. That is not just on the hardware front. You know, vendors like HP have to deliver world beating technology and it's hard, hard. But then there's also the challenge to the users. How do they get the codes to work in the face of that much parallelism? >>If you look at what the the complexity is delivering an annex a flop. Andi, you could have bought an extra flop three or four years ago. You couldn't have housed it. You couldn't have powered it. You couldn't have afforded it on, do you? Couldn't program it. But you still you could have You could have bought one. We should have been so lucky to be unable to supply it. Um, the software, um I think from our standpoint, is is looking like where we're doing mawr enabling with our customers. You sell them a machine on, then the the need then to do collaboration specifically seems mawr and Maura around the software. Um, so it's It's gonna be relatively easy to get one x a flop using limb pack, but but that's not extra scale. So what do you think? On exa scale machine versus an X? A flop machine means to the people like yourself to your users, the scientists and industry. What is an ex? A flop versus >>an exa scale? So I think, you know, supercomputing moves forward by setting itself challenges. And when you when you look at all of the excess scale programs worldwide that are trying to deliver systems that can do an X a lot form or it's actually very arbitrary challenge. You know, we set ourselves a PETA scale challenge delivering a petaflop somebody manage that, Andi. But you know, the world moves forward by setting itself challenges e think you know, we use quite arbitrary definition of what we mean is well by an exit block. So, you know, in your in my world, um, we either way, first of all, see ah flop is a computation, so multiply or it's an ad or whatever on we tend. Thio, look at that is using very high precision numbers or 64 bit numbers on Do you know, we then say, Well, you've got to do the next block. You've got to do a billion billion of those calculations every second. No, a some of the last arbitrary target Now you know today from HPD Aiken by my assistant and will do a billion billion calculations per second. And they will either do that as a theoretical peak, which would be almost unattainable, or using benchmarks that stressed the system on demonstrate a relaxing law. But again, those benchmarks themselves attuned Thio. Just do those calculations and deliver and explore been a steady I'll way if you like. So, you know, way kind of set ourselves this this this big challenge You know, the big fence on the race course, which were clambering over. But the challenge in itself actually should be. I'm much more interesting. The water we're going to use these devices for having built um, eso. Getting into the extra scale era is not so much about doing an extra block. It's a new generation off capability that allows us to do better scientific and industrial research. And that's the interesting bit in this whole story. >>I would tend to agree with you. I think the the focus around exa scale is to look at, you know, new technologies, new ways of doing things, new ways of looking at data and to get new results. So eventually you will get yourself a nexus scale machine. Um, one hopes, sooner rather >>than later. Well, I'm sure you don't tell me one, Ben. >>It's got nothing to do with may. I can't sell you anything, Mark. But there are people outside the door over there who would love to sell you one. Yes. However, if we if you look at your you know your your exa scale machine, Um, how do you believe the workloads are going to be different on an extra scale machine versus your current PETA scale machine? >>So I think there's always a slight conceit when you buy a new national supercomputer. On that conceit is that you're buying a capability that you know on. But many people will run on the whole system. Known truth. We do have people that run on the whole of our archer system. Today's A 118,000 cores, but I would say, and I'm looking at the system. People that run over say, half of that can be counted on Europe on a single hand in a year, and they're doing very specific things. It's very costly simulation they're running on. So, you know, if you look at these systems today, two things show no one is. It's very difficult to get time on them. The Baroque application procedures All of the requirements have to be assessed by your peers and your given quite limited amount of time that you have to eke out to do science. Andi people tend to run their applications in the sweet spot where their application delivers the best performance on You know, we try to push our users over time. Thio use reasonably sized jobs. I think our average job says about 20,000 course, she's not bad, but that does mean that as we move to the exits, kill two things have to happen. One is actually I think we've got to be more relaxed about giving people access to the system, So let's give more people access, let people play, let people try out ideas they've never tried out before. And I think that will lead to a lot more innovation and computational science. But at the same time, I think we also need to be less precious. You know, we to accept these systems will have a variety of sizes of job on them. You know, we're still gonna have people that want to run four million cores or two million cores. That's absolutely fine. Absolutely. Salute those people for trying really, really difficult. But then we're gonna have a huge spectrum of views all the way down to people that want to run on 500 cores or whatever. So I think we need Thio broaden the user base in Alexa Skill system. And I know this is what's happening, for example, in Japan with the new Japanese system. >>So, Mark, if you cast your mind back to almost exactly a year ago after the HPC user forum, you were interviewed for Premier Magazine on Do you alluded in that article to the needs off scientific industrial users requiring, you know, uh on X a flop or an exa scale machine it's clear in your in your previous answer regarding, you know, the workloads. Some would say that the majority of people would be happier with, say, 10 100 petaflop machines. You know, democratization. More people access. But can you provide us examples at the type of science? The needs of industrial users that actually do require those resources to be put >>together as an exa scale machine? So I think you know, it's a very interesting area. At the end of the day, these systems air bought because they are capability systems on. I absolutely take the argument. Why shouldn't we buy 10 100 pattern block systems? But there are a number of scientific areas even today that would benefit from a nexus school system and on these the sort of scientific areas that will use as much access onto a system as much time and as much scale of the system as they can, as you can give them eso on immediate example. People doing chroma dynamics calculations in particle physics, theoretical calculations, they would just use whatever you give them. But you know, I think one of the areas that is very interesting is actually the engineering space where, you know, many people worry the engineering applications over the last decade haven't really kept up with this sort of supercomputers that we have. I'm leading a project called Asimov, funded by M. P S O. C in the UK, which is jointly with Rolls Royce, jointly funded by Rolls Royce and also working with the University of Cambridge, Oxford, Bristol, Warrick. We're trying to do the whole engine gas turbine simulation for the first time. So that's looking at the structure of the gas turbine, the airplane engine, the structure of it, how it's all built it together, looking at the fluid dynamics off the air and the hot gasses, the flu threat, looking at the combustion of the engine looking how fuel is spread into the combustion chamber. Looking at the electrics around, looking at the way the engine two forms is, it heats up and cools down all of that. Now Rolls Royce wants to do that for 20 years. Andi, Uh, whenever they certify, a new engine has to go through a number of physical tests, and every time they do on those tests, it could cost them as much as 25 to $30 million. These are very expensive tests, particularly when they do what's called a blade off test, which would be, you know, blade failure. They could prove that the engine contains the fragments of the blade. Sort of think, continue face really important test and all engines and pass it. What we want to do is do is use an exa scale computer to properly model a blade off test for the first time, so that in future, some simulations can become virtual rather than having thio expend all of the money that Rolls Royce would normally spend on. You know, it's a fascinating project is a really hard project to do. One of the things that I do is I am deaf to share this year. Gordon Bell Price on bond I've really enjoyed to do. That's one of the major prizes in our area, you know, gets announced supercomputing every year. So I have the pleasure of reading all the submissions each year. I what's been really interesting thing? This is my third year doing being on the committee on what's really interesting is the way that big systems like Summit, for example, in the US have pushed the user communities to try and do simulations Nowhere. Nobody's done before, you know. And we've seen this as well, with papers coming after the first use of the for Goku system in Japan, for example, people you know, these are very, very broad. So, you know, earthquake simulation, a large Eddie simulations of boats. You know, a number of things around Genome Wide Association studies, for example. So the use of these computers spans of last area off computational science. I think the really really important thing about these systems is their challenging people that do calculations they've never done before. That's what's important. >>Okay, Thank you. You talked about challenges when I nearly said when you and I had lots of hair, but that's probably much more true of May. Um, we used to talk about grand challenges we talked about, especially around the teraflop era, the ski red program driving, you know, the grand challenges of science, possibly to hide the fact that it was a bomb designing computer eso they talked about the grand challenges. Um, we don't seem to talk about that much. We talk about excess girl. We talk about data. Um Where are the grand challenges that you see that an exa scale computer can you know it can help us. Okay, >>so I think grand challenges didn't go away. Just the phrase went out of fashion. Um, that's like my hair. I think it's interesting. The I do feel the science moves forward by setting itself grand challenges and always had has done, you know, my original backgrounds in particle physics. I was very lucky to spend four years at CERN working in the early stage of the left accelerator when it first came online on. Do you know the scientists there? I think they worked on left 15 years before I came in and did my little ph d on it. Andi, I think that way of organizing science hasn't changed. We just talked less about grand challenges. I think you know what I've seen over the last few years is a renaissance in computational science, looking at things that have previously, you know, people have said have been impossible. So a couple of years ago, for example, one of the key Gordon Bell price papers was on Genome Wide Association studies on some of it. If I may be one of the winner of its, if I remember right on. But that was really, really interesting because first of all, you know, the sort of the Genome Wide Association Studies had gone out of favor in the bioinformatics by a scientist community because people thought they weren't possible to compute. But that particular paper should Yes, you could do these really, really big Continental little problems in a reasonable amount of time if you had a big enough computer. And one thing I felt all the way through my career actually is we've probably discarded Mawr simulations because they were impossible at the time that we've actually decided to do. And I sometimes think we to challenge ourselves by looking at the things we've discovered in the past and say, Oh, look, you know, we could actually do that now, Andi, I think part of the the challenge of bringing an extra service toe life is to get people to think about what they would use it for. That's a key thing. Otherwise, I always say, a computer that is unused to just be turned off. There's no point in having underutilized supercomputer. Everybody loses from that. >>So Let's let's bring ourselves slightly more up to date. We're in the middle of a global pandemic. Uh, on board one of the things in our industry has bean that I've been particularly proud about is I've seen the vendors, all the vendors, you know, offering up machine's onboard, uh, making resources available for people to fight things current disease. Um, how do you see supercomputers now and in the future? Speeding up things like vaccine discovery on help when helping doctors generally. >>So I think you're quite right that, you know, the supercomputer community around the world actually did a really good job of responding to over 19. Inasmuch as you know, speaking for the UK, we put in place a rapid access program. So anybody wanted to do covert research on the various national services we have done to the to two services Could get really quick access. Um, on that, that has worked really well in the UK You know, we didn't have an archer is an old system, Aziz. You know, we didn't have the world's largest supercomputer, but it is happily bean running lots off covert 19 simulations largely for the biomedical community. Looking at Druk modeling and molecular modeling. Largely that's just been going the US They've been doing really large uh, combinatorial parameter search problems on on Summit, for example, looking to see whether or not old drugs could be reused to solve a new problem on DSO, I think, I think actually, in some respects Kobe, 19 is being the sounds wrong. But it's actually been good for supercomputing. Inasmuch is pointed out to governments that supercomputers are important parts off any scientific, the active countries research infrastructure. >>So, um, I'll finish up and tap into your inner geek. Um, there's a lot of technologies that are being banded around to currently enable, you know, the first exa scale machine, wherever that's going to be from whomever, what are the current technologies or emerging technologies that you are interested in excited about looking forward to getting your hands on. >>So in the business case I've written for the U. K's exa scale computer, I actually characterized this is a choice between the American model in the Japanese model. Okay, both of frozen, both of condoms. Eso in America, they're very much gone down the chorus plus GPU or GPU fruit. Um, so you might have, you know, an Intel Xeon or an M D process er center or unarmed process or, for that matter on you might have, you know, 24 g. P. U s. I think the most interesting thing that I've seen is definitely this move to a single address space. So the data that you have will be accessible, but the G p u on the CPU, I think you know, that's really bean. One of the key things that stopped the uptake of GPS today and that that that one single change is going Thio, I think, uh, make things very, very interesting. But I'm not entirely convinced that the CPU GPU model because I think that it's very difficult to get all the all the performance set of the GPU. You know, it will do well in H p l, for example, high performance impact benchmark we're discussing at the beginning of this interview. But in riel scientific workloads, you know, you still find it difficult to find all the performance that has promised. So, you know, the Japanese approach, which is the core, is only approach. E think it's very attractive, inasmuch as you know They're using very high bandwidth memory, very interesting process of which they are going to have to, you know, which they could develop together over 10 year period. And this is one thing that people don't realize the Japanese program and the American Mexico program has been working for 10 years on these systems. I think the Japanese process really interesting because, um, it when you look at the performance, it really does work for their scientific work clothes, and that's that does interest me a lot. This this combination of a A process are designed to do good science, high bandwidth memory and a real understanding of how data flows around the supercomputer. I think those are the things are exciting me at the moment. Obviously, you know, there's new networking technologies, I think, in the fullness of time, not necessarily for the first systems. You know, over the next decade we're going to see much, much more activity on silicon photonics. I think that's really, really fascinating all of these things. I think in some respects the last decade has just bean quite incremental improvements. But I think we're supercomputing is going in the moment. We're a very very disruptive moment again. That goes back to start this discussion. Why is extra skill been difficult to get? Thio? Actually, because the disruptive moment in technology. >>Professor Parsons, thank you very much for your time and your insights. Thank you. Pleasure and folks. Thank you for watching. I hope you've learned something, or at least enjoyed it. With that, I would ask you to stay safe and goodbye.
SUMMARY :
I am the director of HPC Strategic programs I suppose that the S I milestones of high performance computing's come and go, But looking at the X scale we're looking at, you know, four or five million cores on taming But you still you could have You could have bought one. challenges e think you know, we use quite arbitrary focus around exa scale is to look at, you know, new technologies, Well, I'm sure you don't tell me one, Ben. outside the door over there who would love to sell you one. So I think there's always a slight conceit when you buy a you know, the workloads. That's one of the major prizes in our area, you know, gets announced you know, the grand challenges of science, possibly to hide I think you know what I've seen over the last few years is a renaissance about is I've seen the vendors, all the vendors, you know, Inasmuch as you know, speaking for the UK, we put in place a rapid to currently enable, you know, I think you know, that's really bean. Professor Parsons, thank you very much for your time and your insights.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Ben Bennett | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1989 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rolls Royce | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
500 cores | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Parsons | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1990 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
1987 | DATE | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
118,000 cores | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
CERN | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.99+ |
four million cores | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two million cores | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Genome Wide Association | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ben | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first systems | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two forms | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IPCC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | DATE | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
University of Cambridge | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
five million cores | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Mark Parsons | PERSON | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
$30 million | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Edinburgh Parallel Computing Center | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Aziz | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Gordon Bell | PERSON | 0.98+ |
May | DATE | 0.98+ |
64 bit | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about 20,000 course | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Today | DATE | 0.97+ |
Alexa | TITLE | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
HPC | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Xeon | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.95+ |
25 | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
over 10 year | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
1000 cores | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.95+ |
800 mega flops | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Professor | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Andi | PERSON | 0.94+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
couple of years ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
over 19 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
U. K | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
Premier Magazine | TITLE | 0.92+ |
10 100 petaflop machines | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
four years ago | DATE | 0.91+ |
Exascale | LOCATION | 0.91+ |
HPD Aiken | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Physics Successfully Implements Lagrange Multiplier Optimization
>> Hello everybody. My title is Physics Implements Lagrange Multiplier Optimization. And let me be very specific about what I mean by this, is that in physics, there are a series of principles that are optimization principles. And we are just beginning to take advantage of them. For example, most famous in physics is the principle of least action. Of equal importance is the principle of least entropy generation. That's to say a dissipated circuit will try to adjust itself to dissipated as little as possible. There's other concepts first-to-gain-threshold, the variational principle, the adiabatic method, simulated annealing but actual physical annealing. So let's look at some of these that I'm sure you probably know about is the principle of least time. And this is sort of illustrated by a lifeguard who is trying to save a swimmer and runs as fast as possible along the sand and finally jumps in the water. So it's like the refraction of light. The lifeguard is trying to get to the swimmer as quickly as possible and is trying to follow the path that takes the least amount of time. This of course occurs in optics and classical mechanics and so forth. It's the principle of least action. Let me show you another one. The principle of minimum power dissipation. Imagine you had a circuit like this, where the current was dividing unequally. Well, that would make you feel very uncomfortable. The circuit will automatically try to adjust itself, so that the two branches which are equal actually are drawing equal amount of current. If they are unequal, it will dissipate excess energy. So we talk about least power dissipation, more sophisticated way of saying the same thing is the least entropy production. This is actually the most common one of all. Here's one that's kind of interesting. People have made a lot of hay about this, is you have lasers and you try to reach the threshold. And so you have different modes on the horizontal axis. And then one mode happens to have the lowest loss and then all the energy goes into that mode. This is the first-to-gain-threshold. This is also a type of minimization principle because physics finds the mode with the lowest gain threshold. Now, what I'll show about this, is it's not as good as it seems because there continues to be, even after you reach the gain threshold, there continues to be evolution among the modes. And so it's not quite as clear cut as it might seem. Here's the one it's famous, the variational principle. It says you have a trial wave function, the red one, it's no good because it has too much energy. The true wave function is illustrated in green. And that one has fines automatically. The fines, the situation with the wave function has the lowest energy. Here's one, of course it's just physical annealing in which you could do as physical annealing, which you could also think of it as simulated annealing. And in simulated annealing, you add noise or you raise the temperature, or do something else to jump out of local minima. So you do tend to get stuck in all of these methods. You tend to get stuck in local minima and you have to find a strategy to jump out of those local minima, but certainly physical annealing actually promises to give you a global optimum. So that's, we've got to keep that one in mind. And then there's the adiabatic method. And in the adiabatic method, you have modes. Now I am one who believes that we could do this even classically, just with LC circuits? We have avoided crossings. And the avoided crossings are such that you start from a solvable problem, and then you go to a very difficult to solve problem. And yet you stay in the ground state and I'm sure you all know this. This is the adiabatic method. Some people think of it as quantum mechanical, it could be, but it's also a classical. And what you're adjusting is one of the inductances in a complicated LC circuit. And this is sort of another illustration of the same thing, a little bit more complicated graph. You go from a simple Hamiltonian to a hard Hamiltonian, and you find a solution that way. So these are all minimization principles. Now, one of the preferred attributes is to have a digital answer, which we can get with bistable elements, physics is loaded with bistable elements, starting with the flip-flop. And you can imagine somehow coupling them together. I show you here just resistors, but it's very important that the, you don't have a pure analog machine. You want to have a machine that provides digital answers and the flip-flop is actually an analog machine, but it locks into a digital state. And so we want bistable elements that will give us binary answers. Okay, so having quickly gone through it, which of these is the best? So let's try to answer, which of these is the best for doing optimization? Which physics principle might be the best? And so one of our nice problems that we like to solve is the Ising problem. And there's a way to set that up with circuits and you can have LC circuits and try to mimic the ferromagnetic case as the two circuits are in phase and so you have, you try to lock them into, either positive or negative phase. You can do that with parametric gains. You have classical parametric gain with a two omega modulation on a capacitor and it's bistable. And if you have crossing couplings, then it's a, the phases tend to be opposite. And so you tend to have anti-ferromagnetic coupling. So you can mimic with these circuits, but there's so many ways to mimic it. So we'll see some more examples. Now, one of the main points I'm going to make today is that it's very easy to set up a physical system that not only does optimization, but also includes constraints and the constraints we normally take into account with Lagrange multipliers and this sort of an explanation of Lagrange multipliers. You're trying to go toward the absolute optimum here, but you run into the red constraint. So you get stopped right there. And the gradient of the constraint is opposite to the a, they cancel each other, the gradient of the merit function. So this is standard stuff in college, Lagrange multiplier calculus. So if physics does this, how does it do it? Well, it does it by steepest descent. We just follow it. Physics, for example, will try to go to the state of lowest power dissipation. So it goes, and it minimizes the participation in blue, but also tries to satisfy the constraint. And then we finally, we find the optimum point in some multi-dimensional configuration space. Another way of saying it, is we go from some initial state to some final state and physics does this for you for free, because it is always trying to reduce the entropy production, the power dissipation. And so there have been, I'm going to show you now five different schemes, actually I have about eight different schemes. And they all use the principle of minimum entropy generation but not all of them recognize it. So here's some work from my colleague, Roychowdhury here in my department, and he has these very amplitude, stable oscillators, but they tend to lock into a phase and in this way, it's unnatural for solving the Ising problem. But if you analyze it in detail and I'll show you the link to the archive where we've shown this is that this one is trying to satisfy the principle of minimum entropy generation and it includes constraints. And the most important constraint for us is that we want a digital answer. So we want to have either a plus or minus as the answer and the parametric oscillator permits that. He's not using a parametric oscillator, he's using something a little different, but it's somewhat similar. He's using lock sort of second-harmonic locking. It's similar to the parametric oscillator. And here's another approach from England, Cambridge University. I have the symbol of the university here and they got very excited. They have polaritons, exciton-polaritons they were very excited about that. But to us they're really just coupled electromagnetic modes and created by optical excitation. And they lock into definite phases and no big surprise they're actually, it also follows, it tends to lock in, in such a way that it minimizes the power dissipation, and it is very easy to include the digital constraint in there. And so that's yet another example. Of course, all the examples I'm going to show you from literature are all following the principle of minimum entropy generation. This is not always acknowledged by the authors. This is the Yamamoto Stanford approach. Thank you very much for inviting me. So I've analyzed this one with, we think that what's going on here. I think the quantum mechanical version could be very interesting possibly. But the versions that are out there right now are they're dissipative and there's dissipation in the optical fiber it's overcome by the parametric gain. And the net conclusion of this is that the different optical parametric oscillator pulses are trying to organize themselves in such a way as to minimize the power dissipation. So it's based upon minimum entropy generation, which for our purposes is synonymous with minimizing the power dissipation. And of course, very beautifully done. It is a very beautiful system because it's time multiplexed and it locks in to digital answers. So that's very nice. Here's something different, not the Ising problem from MIT. It is an optimizer. It's an optimizer for artificial intelligence. It uses Silicon Photonics and does unitary operations. We've gone through this very carefully. I'm sure to the people at MIT, they think they have something very unusual. But to us, this is usual. This is an example of minimizing the power dissipation. As you go round over and over again, through the Silicon Photonics, you end up minimizing the power dissipation. It's kind of surprising. And principle of minimum entropy generation again. Okay. And this is from my own group where we try to mimic the coherent ising machine, except it's just electrical. And we get the, this is an anti-ferromagnetic configuration. If the resistors were this way, it would be a ferromagnetic configuration. And we can arrange that. So I've just done five of my, I think I could have done a few more, but we're running out of time. But all of these optimization approaches are similar in that they're based upon minimum entropy generation, which is a, I don't want to say it's a law of physics, but it's accepted by many physicists, and you have different examples, including particularly MIT's optimizer for artificial intelligence. They all seem to take advantage of this type of physics. So they're all versions of minimum entropy generation. The physics hardware implements steepest descent physically. And because of the constraint though, it produces a binary output. Which is digital in the same sense that a flip-flop is digital. What's the promise? The promise is that the physics-based hardware will perform the same function at far greater speed and far less power dissipation. Now. The challenge of global optimization remains unsolved. I don't think anybody has a solution to the problem of global optimization. We can try to do better, we can get a little closer. But if, so even setting that aside, there all these terrific applications in deep learning and in neural network back-propagation, artificial intelligence, control theory. So there many applications, operations research, biology, et cetera. But there are a couple of action items needed to go further. And that is, I believe that the electronic implementation is perhaps a little easier to scale. And so we need to design some chips. So we need a chip with an array of oscillators. If you had a thousand LC oscillators on the chip, I think that would be already be very interesting. But you need to interconnect them. This would require a resistive network with about a million resistors. I think that can also be done on a chip. So minimizing the power dissipation is the whole point, but you'll do have to, there is an accuracy problem. The resistors have to be very precise but there's good news. Resistors can be programmed very accurately and I'll be happy to take questions on that. So later step though, once we have the chips is we need compiler software to convert the unknown problem into the given resistance values that will fit within these oscillator chips. So let me pause then for questions and thank you very much for your attention.
SUMMARY :
And because of the constraint though,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
two branches | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Roychowdhury | PERSON | 0.99+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Yamamoto | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five different schemes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
two circuits | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cambridge University | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one mode | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
about a million resistors | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
two omega | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Silicon Photonics | OTHER | 0.87+ |
England | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
a thousand LC | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Physics Implements Lagrange Multiplier Optimization | TITLE | 0.8+ |
about eight different schemes | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Hamiltonian | OTHER | 0.63+ |
much | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
Stanford | ORGANIZATION | 0.48+ |
Leicester Clinical Data Science Initiative
>>Hello. I'm Professor Toru Suzuki Cherif cardiovascular medicine on associate dean of the College of Life Sciences at the University of Leicester in the United Kingdom, where I'm also director of the Lester Life Sciences accelerator. I'm also honorary consultant cardiologist within our university hospitals. It's part of the national health system NHS Trust. Today, I'd like to talk to you about our Lester Clinical Data Science Initiative. Now brief background on Lester. It's university in hospitals. Lester is in the center of England. The national health system is divided depending on the countries. The United Kingdom, which is comprised of, uh, England, Scotland to the north, whales to the west and Northern Ireland is another part in a different island. But national health system of England is what will be predominantly be discussed. Today has a history of about 70 years now, owing to the fact that we're basically in the center of England. Although this is only about one hour north of London, we have a catchment of about 100 miles, which takes us from the eastern coast of England, bordering with Birmingham to the west north just south of Liverpool, Manchester and just south to the tip of London. We have one of the busiest national health system trust in the United Kingdom, with a catchment about 100 miles and one million patients a year. Our main hospital, the General Hospital, which is actually called the Royal Infirmary, which can has an accident and emergency, which means Emergency Department is that has one of the busiest emergency departments in the nation. I work at Glen Field Hospital, which is one of the main cardiovascular hospitals of the United Kingdom and Europe. Academically, the Medical School of the University of Leicester is ranked 20th in the world on Lee, behind Cambridge, Oxford Imperial College and University College London. For the UK, this is very research. Waited, uh, ranking is Therefore we are very research focused universities as well for the cardiovascular research groups, with it mainly within Glenn Field Hospital, we are ranked as the 29th Independent research institution in the world which places us. A Suffield waited within our group. As you can see those their top ranked this is regardless of cardiology, include institutes like the Broad Institute and Whitehead Institute. Mitt Welcome Trust Sanger, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Kemble, Cold Spring Harbor and as a hospital we rank within ah in this field in a relatively competitive manner as well. Therefore, we're very research focused. Hospital is well now to give you the unique selling points of Leicester. We're we're the largest and busiest national health system trust in the United Kingdom, but we also have a very large and stable as well as ethnically diverse population. The population ranges often into three generations, which allows us to do a lot of cohort based studies which allows us for the primary and secondary care cohorts, lot of which are well characterized and focused on genomics. In the past. We also have a biomedical research center focusing on chronic diseases, which is funded by the National Institutes of Health Research, which funds clinical research the hospitals of United Kingdom on we also have a very rich regional life science cluster, including med techs and small and medium sized enterprises. Now for this, the bottom line is that I am the director of the letter site left Sciences accelerator, >>which is tasked with industrial engagement in the local national sectors but not excluding the international sectors as well. Broadly, we have academics and clinicians with interest in health care, which includes science and engineering as well as non clinical researchers. And prior to the cove it outbreak, the government announced the £450 million investment into our university hospitals, which I hope will be going forward now to give you a brief background on where the scientific strategy the United Kingdom lies. Three industrial strategy was brought out a za part of the process which involved exiting the European Union, and part of that was the life science sector deal. And among this, as you will see, there were four grand challenges that were put in place a I and data economy, future of mobility, clean growth and aging society and as a medical research institute. A lot of the focus that we have been transitioning with within my group are projects are focused on using data and analytics using artificial intelligence, but also understanding how chronic diseases evolved as part of the aging society, and therefore we will be able to address these grand challenges for the country. Additionally, the national health system also has its long term plans, which we align to. One of those is digitally enabled care and that this hope you're going mainstream over the next 10 years. And to do this, what is envision will be The clinicians will be able to access and interact with patient records and care plants wherever they are with ready access to decision support and artificial intelligence, and that this will enable predictive techniques, which include linking with clinical genomic as well as other data supports, such as image ing a new medical breakthroughs. There has been what's called the Topol Review that discusses the future of health care in the United Kingdom and preparing the health care workforce for the delivery of the digital future, which clearly discusses in the end that we would be using automated image interpretation. Is using artificial intelligence predictive analytics using artificial intelligence as mentioned in the long term plans. That is part of that. We will also be engaging natural language processing speech recognition. I'm reading the genome amusing. Genomic announced this as well. We are in what is called the Midland's. As I mentioned previously, the Midland's comprised the East Midlands, where we are as Lester, other places such as Nottingham. We're here. The West Midland involves Birmingham, and here is ah collective. We are the Midlands. Here we comprise what is called the Midlands engine on the Midland's engine focuses on transport, accelerating innovation, trading with the world as well as the ultra connected region. And therefore our work will also involve connectivity moving forward. And it's part of that. It's part of our health care plans. We hope to also enable total digital connectivity moving forward and that will allow us to embrace digital data as well as collectivity. These three key words will ah Linkous our health care systems for the future. Now, to give you a vision for the future of medicine vision that there will be a very complex data set that we will need to work on, which will involve genomics Phanom ICS image ing which will called, uh oh mix analysis. But this is just meaning that is, uh complex data sets that we need to work on. This will integrate with our clinical data Platforms are bioinformatics, and we'll also get real time information of physiology through interfaces and wearables. Important for this is that we have computing, uh, processes that will now allow this kind of complex data analysis in real time using artificial intelligence and machine learning based applications to allow visualization Analytics, which could be out, put it through various user interfaces to the clinician and others. One of the characteristics of the United Kingdom is that the NHS is that we embrace data and captured data from when most citizens have been born from the cradle toe when they die to the grave. And it's important that we were able to link this data up to understand the journey of that patient. Over time. When they come to hospital, which is secondary care data, we will get disease data when they go to their primary care general practitioner, we will be able to get early check up data is Paula's follow monitoring monitoring, but also social care data. If this could be linked, allow us to understand how aging and deterioration as well as frailty, uh, encompasses thes patients. And to do this, we have many, many numerous data sets available, including clinical letters, blood tests, more advanced tests, which is genetics and imaging, which we can possibly, um, integrate into a patient journey which will allow us to understand the digital journey of that patient. I have called this the digital twin patient cohort to do a digital simulation of patient health journeys using data integration and analytics. This is a technique that has often been used in industrial manufacturing to understand the maintenance and service points for hardware and instruments. But we would be using this to stratify predict diseases. This'll would also be monitored and refined, using wearables and other types of complex data analysis to allow for, in the end, preemptive intervention to allow paradigm shifting. How we undertake medicine at this time, which is more reactive rather than proactive as infrastructure we are presently working on putting together what's it called the Data Safe haven or trusted research environment? One which with in the clinical environment, the university hospitals and curated and data manner, which allows us to enable data mining off the databases or, I should say, the trusted research environment within the clinical environment. Hopefully, we will then be able to anonymous that to allow ah used by academics and possibly also, uh, partnering industry to do further data mining and tool development, which we could then further field test again using our real world data base of patients that will be continually, uh, updating in our system. In the cardiovascular group, we have what's called the bricks cohort, which means biomedical research. Informatics Center for Cardiovascular Science, which was done, started long time even before I joined, uh, in 2010 which has today almost captured about 10,000 patients arm or who come through to Glenn Field Hospital for various treatments or and even those who have not on. We asked for their consent to their blood for genetics, but also for blood tests, uh, genomics testing, but also image ing as well as other consent. Hable medical information s so far there about 10,000 patients and we've been trying to extract and curate their data accordingly. Again, a za reminder of what the strengths of Leicester are. We have one of the largest and busiest trust with the very large, uh, patient cohort Ah, focused dr at the university, which allows for chronic diseases such as heart disease. I just mentioned our efforts on heart disease, uh which are about 10,000 patients ongoing right now. But we would wish thio include further chronic diseases such as diabetes, respiratory diseases, renal disease and further to understand the multi modality between these diseases so that we can understand how they >>interact as well. Finally, I like to talk about the lesser life science accelerator as well. This is a new project that was funded by >>the U started this January for three years. I'm the director for this and all the groups within the College of Life Sciences that are involved with healthcare but also clinical work are involved. And through this we hope to support innovative industrial partnerships and collaborations in the region, a swells nationally and further on into internationally as well. I realized that today is a talked to um, or business and commercial oriented audience. And we would welcome interest from your companies and partners to come to Leicester toe work with us on, uh, clinical health care data and to drive our agenda forward for this so that we can enable innovative research but also product development in partnership with you moving forward. Thank you for your time.
SUMMARY :
We have one of the busiest national health system trust in the United Kingdom, with a catchment as part of the aging society, and therefore we will be able to address these grand challenges for Finally, I like to talk about the lesser the U started this January for three years.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
National Institutes of Health Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Howard Hughes Medical Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Birmingham | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Broad Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
England | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
College of Life Sciences | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Whitehead Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United Kingdom | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Toru Suzuki Cherif | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
£450 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lester | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oxford Imperial College | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Leicester | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
European Union | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Informatics Center for Cardiovascular Science | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Scotland | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Glenn Field Hospital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Manchester | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nottingham | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cold Spring Harbor | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
General Hospital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Glen Field Hospital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kemble | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Royal Infirmary | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
about 100 miles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Northern Ireland | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lester Life Sciences | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Liverpool | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
about 70 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Midland | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
about 10,000 patients | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
University of Leicester | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
NHS Trust | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Mitt Welcome Trust Sanger | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Paula | PERSON | 0.98+ |
West Midland | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
about 10,000 patients | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
East Midlands | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
about one hour | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
NHS | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
20th | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
United Kingdom | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
University College London | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one million patients a year | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Suffield | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Three industrial strategy | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
three generations | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Lester Clinical Data Science Initiative | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Lee | LOCATION | 0.88+ |
January | DATE | 0.88+ |
Medical School of the | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
University of Leicester | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Midlands | LOCATION | 0.87+ |
Lester | LOCATION | 0.87+ |
three key words | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Topol Review | TITLE | 0.85+ |
Leicester | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
Leicester Clinical Data Science Initiative | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
four grand challenges | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Emergency Department | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
twin patient | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
29th Independent research | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
next 10 years | DATE | 0.66+ |
Eileen Vidrine, US Air Force | MIT CDOIQ 2020
>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's theCube with digital coverage of MIT, Chief Data Officer and Information Quality Symposium brought to you by Silicon Angle Media. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman and this is the seventh year of theCubes coverage of the MIT, Chief Data Officer and Information Quality Symposium. We love getting to talk to these chief data officers and the people in this ecosystem, the importance of data, driving data-driven cultures, and really happy to welcome to the program, first time guests Eileen Vitrine, Eileen is the Chief Data Officer for the United States Air Force, Eileen, thank you so much for joining us. >> Thank you Stu really excited about being here today. >> All right, so the United States Air Force, I believe had it first CDO office in 2017, you were put in the CDO role in June of 2018. If you could, bring us back, give us how that was formed inside the Air force and how you came to be in that role. >> Well, Stu I like to say that we are a startup organization and a really mature organization, so it's really about culture change and it began by bringing a group of amazing citizen airman reservists back to the Air Force to bring their skills from industry and bring them into the Air Force. So, I like to say that we're a total force because we have active and reservists working with civilians on a daily basis and one of the first things we did in June was we stood up a data lab, that's based in the Jones building on Andrews Air Force Base. And there, we actually take small use cases that have enterprise focus, and we really try to dig deep to try to drive data insights, to inform senior leaders across the department on really important, what I would call enterprise focused challenges, it's pretty exciting. >> Yeah, it's been fascinating when we've dug into this ecosystem, of course while the data itself is very sensitive and I'm sure for the Air Force, there are some very highest level of security, the practices that are done as to how to leverage data, the line between public and private blurs, because you have people that have come from industry that go into government and people that are from government that have leveraged their experiences there. So, if you could give us a little bit of your background and what it is that your charter has been and what you're looking to build out, as you mentioned that culture of change. >> Well, I like to say I began my data leadership journey as an active duty soldier in the army, and I was originally a transportation officer, today we would use the title condition based maintenance, but back then, it was really about running the numbers so that I could optimize my truck fleet on the road each and every day, so that my soldiers were driving safely. Data has always been part of my leadership journey and so I like to say that one of our challenges is really to make sure that data is part of every airmans core DNA, so that they're using the right data at the right level to drive insights, whether it's tactical, operational or strategic. And so it's really about empowering each and every airman, which I think is pretty exciting. >> There's so many pieces of that data, you talk about data quality, there's obviously the data life cycle. I know your presentation that you're given here at the CDO, IQ talks about the data platform that your team has built, could you explain that? What are the key tenants and what maybe differentiates it from what other organizations might have done? >> So, when we first took the challenge to build our data lab, we really wanted to really come up. Our goal was to have a cross domain solution where we could solve data problems at the appropriate classification level. And so we built the VAULT data platform, VAULT stands for visible, accessible, understandable, linked, and trustworthy. And if you look at the DOD data strategy, they will also add the tenants of interoperability and secure. So, the first steps that we have really focused on is making data visible and accessible to airmen, to empower them, to drive insights from available data to solve their problems. So, it's really about that data empowerment, we like to use the hashtag built by airmen because it's really about each and every airman being part of the solution. And I think it's really an exciting time to be in the Air Force because any airman can solve a really hard challenge and it can very quickly wrap it up rapidly, escalate up with great velocity to senior leadership, to be an enterprise solution. >> Is there some basic training that goes on from a data standpoint? For any of those that have lived in data, oftentimes you can get lost in numbers, you have to have context, you need to understand how do I separate good from bad data, or when is data still valid? So, how does someone in the Air Force get some of that beta data competency? >> Well, we have taken a multitenant approach because each and every airman has different needs. So, we have quite a few pathfinders across the Air Force today, to help what I call, upscale our total force. And so I developed a partnership with the Air Force Institute of Technology and they now have a online graduate level data science certificate program. So, individuals studying at AFIT or remotely have the opportunity to really focus on building up their data touchpoints. Just recently, we have been working on a pathfinder to allow our data officers to get their ICCP Federal Data Sector Governance Certificate Program. So, we've been running what I would call short boot camps to prep data officers to be ready for that. And I think the one that I'm most excited about is that this year, this fall, new cadets at the U.S Air Force Academy will be able to have an undergraduate degree in data science and so it's not about a one prong approach, it's about having short courses as well as academe solutions to up skill our total force moving forward. >> Well, information absolutely is such an important differentiator(laughs) in general business and absolutely the military aspects are there. You mentioned the DOD talks about interoperability in their platform, can you speak a little bit to how you make sure that data is secure? Yet, I'm sure there's opportunities for other organizations, for there to be collaboration between them. >> Well, I like to say, that we don't fight alone. So, I work on a daily basis with my peers, Tom Cecila at the Department of Navy and Greg Garcia at the Department of Army, as well as Mr. David Berg in the DOD level. It's really important that we have an integrated approach moving forward and in the DOD we partner with our security experts, so it's not about us doing security individually, it's really about, in the Air Force we use a term called digital air force, and it's about optimizing and building a trusted partnership with our CIO colleagues, as well as our chief management colleagues because it's really about that trusted partnership to make sure that we're working collaboratively across the enterprise and whatever we do in the department, we also have to reach across our services so that we're all working together. >> Eileen, I'm curious if there's been much impact from the global pandemic. When I talk to enterprise companies, that they had to rapidly make sure that while they needed to protect data, when it was in their four walls and maybe for VPN, now everyone is accessing data, much more work from home and the like. I have to imagine some of those security measures you've already taken, but have there anything along those lines or anything else that this shift in where people are, and a little bit more dispersed has impacted your work? >> Well, the story that I like to say is, that this has given us velocity. So, prior to COVID, we built our VAULT data platform as a multitenancy platform that is also cross-domain solution, so it allows people to develop and do their problem solving in an appropriate classification level. And it allows us to connect or pushup if we need to into higher classification levels. The other thing that it has helped us really work smart because we do as much as we can in that unclassified environment and then using our cloud based solution in our gateways, it allows us to bring people in at a very scheduled component so that we maximize, or we optimize their time on site. And so I really think that it's really given us great velocity because it has really allowed people to work on the right problem set, on the right class of patient level at a specific time. And plus the other pieces, we look at what we're doing is that the problem set that we've had has really allowed people to become more data focused. I think that it's personal for folks moving forward, so it has increased understanding in terms of the need for data insights, as we move forward to drive decision making. It's not that data makes the decision, but it's using the insight to make the decision. >> And one of the interesting conversations we've been having about how to get to those data insights is the use of things like machine learning, artificial intelligence, anything you can share about, how you're looking at that journey, where you are along that discovery. >> Well, I love to say that in order to do AI and machine learning, you have to have great volumes of high quality data. And so really step one was visible, accessible data, but we in the Department of the Air Force stood up an accelerator at MIT. And so we have a group of amazing airmen that are actually working with MIT on a daily basis to solve some of those, what I would call opportunities for us to move forward. My office collaborates with them on a consistent basis, because they're doing additional use cases in that academic environment, which I'm pretty excited about because I think it gives us access to some of the smartest minds. >> All right, Eileen also I understand it's your first year doing the event. Unfortunately, we don't get, all come together in Cambridge, walking those hallways and being able to listen to some of those conversations and follow up is something we've very much enjoyed over the years. What excites you about being interact with your peers and participating in the event this year? >> Well, I really think it's about helping each other leverage the amazing lessons learned. I think that if we look collaboratively, both across industry and in the federal sector, there have been amazing lessons learned and it gives us a great forum for us to really share and leverage those lessons learned as we move forward so that we're not hitting the reboot button, but we actually are starting faster. So, it comes back to the velocity component, it all helps us go faster and at a higher quality level and I think that's really exciting. >> So, final question I have for you, we've talked for years about digital transformation, we've really said that having that data strategy and that culture of leveraging data is one of the most critical pieces of having gone through that transformation. For people that are maybe early on their journey, any advice that you'd give them, having worked through a couple of years of this and the experience you've had with your peers. >> I think that the first thing is that you have to really start with a blank slate and really look at the art of the possible. Don't think about what you've always done, think about where you want to go because there are many different paths to get there. And if you look at what the target goal is, it's really about making sure that you do that backward tracking to get to that goal. And the other piece that I tell my colleagues is celebrate the wins. My team of airmen, they are amazing, it's an honor to serve them and the reality is that they are doing great things and sometimes you want more. And it's really important to celebrate the victories because it's a very long journey and we keep moving the goalposts because we're always striving for excellence. >> Absolutely, it is always a journey that we're on, it's not about the destination. Eileen, thank you so much for sharing all that you've learned and glad you could participate. >> Thank you, STU, I appreciate being included today. Have a great day. >> Thanks and thank you for watching theCube. I'm Stu Miniman stay tuned for more from the MIT, CDO IQ event. (lively upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Silicon Angle Media. and the people in this ecosystem, Thank you Stu really All right, so the of the first things we did sure for the Air Force, at the right level to drive at the CDO, IQ talks to build our data lab, we have the opportunity to and absolutely the It's really important that we that they had to rapidly make Well, the story that I like to say is, And one of the interesting that in order to do AI and participating in the event this year? in the federal sector, is one of the most critical and really look at the art it's not about the destination. Have a great day. from the MIT, CDO IQ event.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eileen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Claire | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Cecila | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Berg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Greg Garcia | PERSON | 0.99+ |
June of 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jonathan Rosenberg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Rose | PERSON | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Eileen Vitrine | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Blair | PERSON | 0.99+ |
U.S Air Force Academy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wednesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
five minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Omni Channel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Air Force Institute of Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Angle Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States Air Force | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Eileen Vidrine | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ryan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Blake | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Blair Pleasant | PERSON | 0.99+ |
BC Strategies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Department of Navy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Confusion | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
five o'Clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
seventh year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twenty years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
first year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twenty | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
decades ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jones | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Andrews Air Force Base | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
United States Air Force | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five nine mugs | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first steps | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this fall | DATE | 0.98+ |
DOD | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Enterprise Connect | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Department of the Air Force | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
AFIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Department of Army | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
CDO IQ | EVENT | 0.96+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Doug Laney, Caserta | MIT CDOIQ 2020
>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of MIT Chief Data Officer and Information Quality symposium brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. >> Hi everybody. This is Dave Vellante and welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of the MIT CDOIQ 2020 event. Of course, it's gone virtual. We wish we were all together in Cambridge. They were going to move into a new building this year for years they've done this event at the Tang Center, moving into a new facility, but unfortunately going to have to wait at least a year, we'll see, But we've got a great guest. Nonetheless, Doug Laney is here. He's a Business Value Strategist, the bestselling author, an analyst, consultant then a long time CUBE friend. Doug, great to see you again. Thanks so much for coming on. >> Dave, great to be with you again as well. So can I ask you? You have been an advocate for obviously measuring the value of data, the CDO role. I don't take this the wrong way, but I feel like the last 150 days have done more to accelerate people's attention on the importance of data and the value of data than all the great work that you've done. What do you think? (laughing) >> It's always great when organizations, actually take advantage of some of these concepts of data value. You may be speaking specifically about the situation with United Airlines and American Airlines, where they have basically collateralized their customer loyalty data, their customer loyalty programs to the tunes of several billion dollars each. And one of the things that's very interesting about that is that the third party valuations of their customer loyalty data, resulted in numbers that were larger than the companies themselves. So basically the value of their data, which is as we've discussed previously off balance sheet is more valuable than the market cap of those companies themselves, which is just incredibly fascinating. >> Well, and of course, all you have to do is look to the Trillionaire's Club. And now of course, Apple pushing two trillion to really see the value that the market places on data. But the other thing is of course, COVID, everybody talks about the COVID acceleration. How have you seen it impact the awareness of the importance of data, whether it applies to business resiliency or even new monetization models? If you're not digital, you can't do business. And digital is all about data. >> I think the major challenge that most organizations are seeing from a data and analytics perspective due to COVID is that their traditional trend based forecast models are broken. If you're a company that's only forecasting based on your own historical data and not taking into consideration, or even identifying what are the leading indicators of your business, then COVID and the economic shutdown have entirely broken those models. So it's raised the awareness of companies to say, "Hey, how can we predict our business now? We can't do it based on our own historical data. We need to look externally at what are those external, maybe global indicators or other kinds of markets that proceed our own forecasts or our own activity." And so the conversion from trend based forecast models to what we call driver based forecast models, isn't easy for a lot of organizations to do. And one of the more difficult parts is identifying what are those external data factors from suppliers, from customers, from partners, from competitors, from complimentary products and services that are leading indicators of your business. And then recasting those models and executing on them. >> And that's a great point. If you think about COVID and how it's changed things, everything's changed, right? The ideal customer profile has changed, your value proposition to those customers has completely changed. You got to rethink that. And of course, it's very hard to predict even when this thing eventually comes back, some kind of hybrid mode, you used to be selling to people in an office environment. That's obviously changed. There's a lot that's permanent there. And data is potentially at least the forward indicator, the canary in the coal mine. >> Right. It also is the product and service. So not only can it help you and improve your forecasting models, but it can become a product or service that you're offering. Look at us right now, we would generally be face to face and person to person, but we're using video technology to transfer this content. And then one of the things that I... It took me awhile to realize, but a couple of months after the COVID shutdown, it occurred to me that even as a consulting organization, Caserta focuses on North America. But the reality is that every consultancy is now a global consultancy because we're all doing business remotely. There are no particular or real strong localization issues for doing consulting today. >> So we talked a lot over the years about the role of the CDO, how it's evolved, how it's changed the course of the early... The pre-title days it was coming out of a data quality world. And it's still vital. Of course, as we heard today from the Keynote, it's much more public, much more exposed, different public data sources, but the role has certainly evolved initially into regulated industries like financial, healthcare and government, but now, many, many more organizations have a CDO. My understanding is that you're giving a talk in the business case for the CDO. Help us understand that. >> Yeah. So one of the things that we've been doing here for the last couple of years is a running an ongoing study of how organizations are impacted by the role of the CDO. And really it's more of a correlation and looking at what are some of the qualities of organizations that have a CDO or don't have a CDO. So some of the things we found is that organizations with a CDO nearly twice as often, mention the importance of data and analytics in their annual report organizations with a C level CDO, meaning a true executive are four times more often likely to be using data, to transform the business. And when we're talking about using data and advanced analytics, we found that organizations with a CIO, not a CDO responsible for their data assets are only half as likely to be doing advanced analytics in any way. So there are a number of interesting things that we found about companies that have a CDO and how they operate a bit differently. >> I want to ask you about that. You mentioned the CIO and we're increasingly seeing lines of reporting and peer reporting alter shift. The sands are shifting a little bit. In the early days the CDO and still predominantly I think is an independent organization. We've seen a few cases and increasingly number where they're reporting into the CIO, we've seen the same thing by the way with the chief Information Security Officer, which used to be considered the fox watching the hen house. So we're seeing those shifts. We've also seen the CDO become more aligned with a technical role and sometimes even emerging out of that technical role. >> Yeah. I think the... I don't know, what I've seen more is that the CDOs are emerging from the business, companies are realizing that data is a business asset. It's not an IT asset. There was a time when data was tightly coupled with applications of technologies, but today data is very easily decoupled from those applications and usable in a wider variety of contexts. And for that reason, as data gets recognized as a business, not an IT asset, you want somebody from the business responsible for overseeing that asset. Yes, a lot of CDOs still report to the CIO, but increasingly more CDOs you're seeing and I think you'll see some other surveys from other organizations this week where the CDOs are more frequently reporting up to the CEO level, meaning they're true executives. Along I advocated for the bifurcation of the IT organization into separate I and T organizations. Again, there's no reason other than for historical purposes to keep the data and technology sides of the organizations so intertwined. >> Well, it makes sense that the Chief Data Officer would have an affinity with the lines of business. And you're seeing a lot of organizations, really trying to streamline their data pipeline, their data life cycles, bringing that together, infuse intelligence into that, but also take a systems view and really have the business be intimately involved, if not even owned into the data. You see a lot of emphasis on self-serve, what are you seeing in terms of that data pipeline or the data life cycle, if you will, that used to be wonky, hard core techies, but now it really involving a lot more constituent. >> Yeah. Well, the data life cycle used to be somewhat short. The data life cycles, they're longer and they're more a data networks than a life cycle and or a supply chain. And the reason is that companies are finding alternative uses for their data, not just using it for a single operational purpose or perhaps reporting purpose, but finding that there are new value streams that can be generated from data. There are value streams that can be generated internally. There are a variety of value streams that can be generated externally. So we work with companies to identify what are those variety of value streams? And then test their feasibility, are they ethically feasible? Are they legally feasible? Are they economically feasible? Can they scale? Do you have the technology capabilities? And so we'll run through a process of assessing the ideas that are generated. But the bottom line is that companies are realizing that data is an asset. It needs to be not just measured as one and managed as one, but also monetized as an asset. And as we've talked about previously, data has these unique qualities that it can be used over and over again, and it generate more data when you use it. And it can be used simultaneously for multiple purposes. So companies like, you mentioned, Apple and others have built business models, based on these unique qualities of data. But I think it's really incumbent upon any organization today to do so as well. >> But when you observed those companies that we talk about all the time, data is at the center of their organization. They maybe put people around that data. That's got to be one of the challenge for many of the incumbents is if we talked about the data silos, the different standards, different data quality, that's got to be fairly major blocker for people becoming a "Data-driven organization." >> It is because some organizations were developed as people driven product, driven brand driven, or other things to try to convert. To becoming data-driven, takes a high degree of data literacy or fluency. And I think there'll be a lot of talk about that this week. I'll certainly mention it as well. And so getting the organization to become data fluent and appreciate data as an asset and understand its possibilities and the art of the possible with data, it's a long road. So the culture change that goes along with it is really difficult. And so we're working with 150 year old consumer brand right now that wants to become more data-driven and they're very product driven. And we hear the CIO say, "We want people to understand that we're a data company that just happens to produce this product. We're not a product company that generates data." And once we realized that and started behaving in that fashion, then we'll be able to really win and thrive in our marketplace. >> So one of the key roles of a Chief Data Officers to understand how data affects the monetization of an organization. Obviously there are four profit companies of your healthcare organization saving lives, obviously being profitable as well, or at least staying within the budget, depending upon the structure of the organization. But a lot of people I think oftentimes misunderstand that it's like, "Okay, do I have to become a data broker? Am I selling data directly?" But I think, you pointed out many times and you just did that unlike oil, that's why we don't like that data as a new oil analogy, because it's so much more valuable and can be use, it doesn't fall because of its scarcity. But what are you finding just in terms of people's application of that notion of monetization? Cutting costs, increasing revenue, what are you seeing in the field? What's that spectrum look like? >> So one of the things I've done over the years is compile a library of hundreds and hundreds of examples of how organizations are using data and analytics in innovative ways. And I have a book in process that hopefully will be out this fall. I'm sharing a number of those inspirational examples. So that's the thing that organizations need to understand is that there are a variety of great examples out there, and they shouldn't just necessarily look to their own industry. There are inspirational examples from other industries as well, many clients come to me and they ask, "What are others in my industry doing?" And my flippant response to that is, "Why do you want to be in second place or third place? Why not take an idea from another industry, perhaps a digital product company and apply that to your own business." But like you mentioned, there are a variety of ways to monetize data. It doesn't involve necessarily selling it. You can deliver analytics, you can report on it, you can use it internally to generate improved business process performance. And as long as you're measuring how data's being applied and what its impact is, then you're in a position to claim that you're monetizing it. But if you're not measuring the impact of data on business processes or on customer relationships or partner supplier relationships or anything else, then it's difficult to claim that you're monetizing it. But one of the more interesting ways that we've been working with organizations to monetize their data, certainly in light of GDPR and the California consumer privacy act where I can't sell you my data anymore, but we've identified ways to monetize your customer data in a couple of ways. One is to synthesize the data, create synthetic data sets that retain the original statistical anomalies in the data or features of the data, but don't share actually any PII. But another interesting way that we've been working with organizations to monetize their data is what I call, Inverted data monetization, where again, I can't share my customer data with you, but I can share information about your products and services with my customers. And take a referral fee or a commission, based on that. So let's say I'm a hospital and I can't sell you my patient data, of course, due to variety of regulations, but I know who my diabetes patients are, and I can introduce them to your healthy meal plans, to your gym memberships, to your at home glucose monitoring kits. And again, take a referral fee or a cut of that action. So we're working with customers and the financial services firm industry and in the healthcare industry on just those kinds of examples. So we've identified hundreds of millions of dollars of incremental value for organizations that from their data that we're just sitting on. >> Interesting. Doug because you're a business value strategist at the top, where in the S curve do you see you're able to have the biggest impact. I doubt that you enter organizations where you say, "Oh, they've got it all figured out. They can't use my advice." But as well, sometimes in the early stages, you may not be able to have as big of an impact because there's not top down support or whatever, there's too much technical data, et cetera, where are you finding you can have the biggest impact, Doug? >> Generally we don't come in and run those kinds of data monetization or information innovation exercises, unless there's some degree of executive support. I've never done that at a lower level, but certainly there are lower level more immediate and vocational opportunities for data to deliver value through, to simply analytics. One of the simple examples I give is, I sold a home recently and when you put your house on the market, everybody comes out of the woodwork, the fly by night, mortgage companies, the moving companies, the box companies, the painters, the landscapers, all know you're moving because your data is in the U.S. and the MLS directory. And it was interesting. The only company that didn't reach out to me was my own bank, and so they lost the opportunity to introduce me to a Mortgage they'd retain me as a client, introduce me to my new branch, print me new checks, move the stuff in my safe deposit box, all of that. They missed a simple opportunity. And I'm thinking, this doesn't require rocket science to figure out which of your customers are moving, the MLS database or you can harvest it from Zillow or other sites is basically public domain data. And I was just thinking, how stupid simple would it have been for them to hire a high school programmer, give him a can of red bull and say, "Listen match our customer database to the MLS database to let us know who's moving on a daily or weekly basis." Some of these solutions are pretty simple. >> So is that part of what you do, come in with just hardcore tactical ideas like that? Are you also doing strategy? Tell me more about how you're spending your time. >> I trying to think more of a broader approach where we look at the data itself and again, people have said, "If you tortured enough, what would you tell us? We're just take that angle." We look at examples of how other organizations have monetized data and think about how to apply those and adapt those ideas to the company's own business. We look at key business drivers, internally and externally. We look at edge cases for their customers' businesses. We run through hypothesis generating activities. There are a variety of different kinds of activities that we do to generate ideas. And most of the time when we run these workshops, which last a week or two, we'll end up generating anywhere from 35 to 50 pretty solid ideas for generating new value streams from data. So when we talk about monetizing data, that's what we mean, generating new value streams. But like I said, then the next step is to go through that feasibility assessment and determining which of these ideas you actually want to pursue. >> So you're of course the longtime industry watcher as well, as a former Gartner Analyst, you have to be. My question is, if I think back... I've been around a while. If I think back at the peak of Microsoft's prominence in the PC era, it was like windows 95 and you felt like, "Wow, Microsoft is just so strong." And then of course the Linux comes along and a lot of open source changes and low and behold, a whole new set of leaders emerges. And you see the same thing today with the Trillionaire's Club and you feel like, "Wow, even COVID has been a tailwind for them." But you think about, "Okay, where could the disruption come to these large players that own huge clouds, they have all the data." Is data potentially a disruptor for what appear to be insurmountable odds against the newbies" >> There's always people coming up with new ways to leverage data or new sources of data to capture. So yeah, there's certainly not going to be around for forever, but it's been really fascinating to see the transformation of some companies I think nobody really exemplifies it more than IBM where they emerged from originally selling meat slicers. The Dayton Meat Slicer was their original product. And then they evolved into Manual Business Machines and then Electronic Business Machines. And then they dominated that. Then they dominated the mainframe software industry. Then they dominated the PC industry. Then they dominated the services industry to some degree. And so they're starting to get into data. And I think following that trajectory is something that really any organization should be looking at. When do you actually become a data company? Not just a product company or a service company or top. >> We have Inderpal Bhandari is one of our huge guests here. He's a Chief-- >> Sure. >> Data Officer of IBM, you know him well. And he talks about the journey that he's undertaken to transform the company into a data company. I think a lot of people don't really realize what's actually going on behind the scenes, whether it's financially oriented or revenue opportunities. But one of the things he stressed to me in our interview was that they're on average, they're reducing the end to end cycle time from raw data to insights by 70%, that's on average. And that's just an enormous, for a company that size, it's just enormous cost savings or revenue generating opportunity. >> There's no doubt that the technology behind data pipelines is improving and the process from moving data from those pipelines directly into predictive or diagnostic or prescriptive output is a lot more accelerated than the early days of data warehousing. >> Is the skills barrier is acute? It seems like it's lessened somewhat, the early Hadoop days you needed... Even data scientist... Is it still just a massive skill shortage, or we're starting to attack that. >> Well, I think companies are figuring out a way around the skill shortage by doing things like self service analytics and focusing on more easy to use mainstream type AI or advanced analytics technologies. But there's still very much a need for data scientists and organizations and the difficulty in finding people that are true data scientists. There's no real certification. And so really anybody can call themselves a data scientist but I think companies are getting good at interviewing and determining whether somebody's got the goods or not. But there are other types of skills that we don't really focus on, like the data engineering skills, there's still a huge need for data engineering. Data doesn't self-organize. There are some augmented analytics technologies that will automatically generate analytic output, but there really aren't technologies that automatically self-organize data. And so there's a huge need for data engineers. And then as we talked about, there's a large interest in external data and harvesting that and then ingesting it and even identifying what external data is out there. So one of the emerging roles that we're seeing, if not the sexiest role of the 21st century is the role of the Data Curator, somebody who acts as a librarian, identifying external data assets that are potentially valuable, testing them, evaluating them, negotiating and then figuring out how to ingest that data. So I think that's a really important role for an organization to have. Most companies have an entire department that procures office supplies, but they don't have anybody who's procuring data supplies. And when you think about which is more valuable to an organization? How do you not have somebody who's dedicated to identifying the world of external data assets that are out there? There are 10 million data sets published by government, organizations and NGOs. There are thousands and thousands of data brokers aggregating and sharing data. There's a web content that can be harvested, there's data from your partners and suppliers, there's data from social media. So to not have somebody who's on top of all that it demonstrates gross negligence by the organization. >> That is such an enlightening point, Doug. My last question is, I wonder how... If you can share with us how the pandemic has effected your business personally. As a consultant, you're on the road a lot, obviously not on the road so much, you're doing a lot of chalk talks, et cetera. How have you managed through this and how have you been able to maintain your efficacy with your clients? >> Most of our clients, given that they're in the digital world a bit already, made the switch pretty quick. Some of them took a month or two, some things went on hold but we're still seeing the same level of enthusiasm for data and doing things with data. In fact some companies have taken our (mumbles) that data to be their best defense in a crisis like this. It's affected our business and it's enabled us to do much more international work more easily than we used to. And I probably spend a lot less time on planes. So it gives me more time for writing and speaking and actually doing consulting. So that's been nice as well. >> Yeah, there's that bonus. Obviously theCUBE yes, we're not doing physical events anymore, but hey, we've got two studios operating. And Doug Laney, really appreciate you coming on. (Dough mumbles) Always a great guest and sharing your insights and have a great MIT CDOIQ. >> Thanks, you too, Dave, take care. (mumbles) >> Thanks Doug. All right. And thank you everybody for watching. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE, our continuous coverage of the MIT Chief Data Officer conference, MIT CDOIQ, will be right back, right after this short break. (bright music)
SUMMARY :
symposium brought to you Doug, great to see you again. and the value of data And one of the things of the importance of data, And one of the more difficult the canary in the coal mine. But the reality is that every consultancy a talk in the business case for the CDO. So some of the things we found is that In the early days the CDO is that the CDOs are that data pipeline or the data life cycle, of assessing the ideas that are generated. for many of the incumbents and the art of the possible with data, of the organization. and apply that to your own business." I doubt that you enter organizations and the MLS directory. So is that part of what you do, And most of the time when of Microsoft's prominence in the PC era, the services industry to some degree. is one of our huge guests here. But one of the things he stressed to me is improving and the process the early Hadoop days you needed... and the difficulty in finding people and how have you been able to maintain our (mumbles) that data to be and sharing your insights Thanks, you too, Dave, take care. of the MIT Chief Data Officer conference,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Doug Laney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
United Airlines | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
American Airlines | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Doug | PERSON | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
21st century | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Inderpal Bhandari | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two trillion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
windows 95 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
a month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
35 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third place | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
MLS | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two studios | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
MIT CDOIQ 2020 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Trillionaire's Club | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
Tang Center | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
California consumer privacy act | TITLE | 0.97+ |
second place | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.97+ |
COVID | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Zillow | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.97+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
MIT Chief Data Officer | EVENT | 0.96+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
a week | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Caserta | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
four times | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.92+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.92+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.91+ |
hundreds of millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
150 year old | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
this fall | DATE | 0.85+ |
MIT CDOIQ | EVENT | 0.85+ |
last couple of years | DATE | 0.84+ |
four profit companies | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
COVID | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
Dough | PERSON | 0.78+ |
Keynote | EVENT | 0.77+ |
Day 2 Livestream | Enabling Real AI with Dell
>>from the Cube Studios >>in Palo Alto and >>Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is a cube conversation. >>Hey, welcome back here. Ready? Jeff Frick here with the Cube. We're doing a special presentation today really talking about AI and making ai really with two companies that are right in the heart of the Dell EMC as well as Intel. So we're excited to have a couple Cube alumni back on the program. Haven't seen him in a little while. First off from Intel. Lisa Spelman. She is the corporate VP and GM for the Xeon Group in Jersey on and Memory Group. Great to see you, Lisa. >>Good to see you again, too. >>And we've got Ravi Pinter. Conte. He is the SBP server product management, also from Dell Technologies. Ravi, great to see you as well. >>Good to see you on beast. Of course, >>yes. So let's jump into it. So, yesterday, Robbie, you guys announced a bunch of new kind of ai based solutions where if you can take us through that >>Absolutely so one of the things we did Jeff was we said it's not good enough for us to have a point product. But we talked about hope, the tour of products, more importantly, everything from our workstation side to the server to these storage elements and things that we're doing with VM Ware, for example. Beyond that, we're also obviously pleased with everything we're doing on bringing the right set off validated configurations and reference architectures and ready solutions so that the customer really doesn't have to go ahead and do the due diligence. Are figuring out how the various integration points are coming for us in making a solution possible. Obviously, all this is based on the great partnership we have with Intel on using not just their, you know, super cues, but FPG's as well. >>That's great. So, Lisa, I wonder, you know, I think a lot of people you know, obviously everybody knows Intel for your CPU is, but I don't think they recognize kind of all the other stuff that can wrap around the core CPU to add value around a particular solution. Set or problems. That's what If you could tell us a little bit more about Z on family and what you guys are doing in the data center with this kind of new interesting thing called AI and machine learning. >>Yeah. Um, so thanks, Jeff and Ravi. It's, um, amazing. The way to see that artificial intelligence applications are just growing in their pervasiveness. And you see it taking it out across all sorts of industries. And it's actually being built into just about every application that is coming down the pipe. And so if you think about meeting toe, have your hardware foundation able to support that. That's where we're seeing a lot of the customer interest come in. And not just a first Xeon, but, like Robbie said on the whole portfolio and how the system and solution configuration come together. So we're approaching it from a total view of being able to move all that data, store all of that data and cross us all of that data and providing options along that entire pipeline that move, um, and within that on Z on. Specifically, we've really set that as our cornerstone foundation for AI. If it's the most deployed solution and data center CPU around the world and every single application is going to have artificial intelligence in it, it makes sense that you would have artificial intelligence acceleration built into the actual hardware so that customers get a better experience right out of the box, regardless of which industry they're in or which specialized function they might be focusing on. >>It's really it's really wild, right? Cause in process, right, you always move through your next point of failure. So, you know, having all these kind of accelerants and the ways that you can carve off parts of the workload part of the intelligence that you can optimize betters is so important as you said Lisa and also Rocket and the solution side. Nobody wants General Ai just for ai sake. It's a nice word. Interesting science experiment. But it's really in the applied. A world is. We're starting to see the value in the application of this stuff, and I wonder you have a customer. You want to highlight Absalon, tell us a little bit about their journey and what you guys did with them. >>Great, sure. I mean, if you didn't start looking at Epsilon there in the market in the marketing business, and one of the crucial things for them is to ensure that they're able to provide the right data. Based on that analysis, there run on? What is it that the customer is looking for? And they can't wait for a period of time, but they need to be doing that in the near real time basis, and that's what excellent does. And what really blew my mind was the fact that they actually service are send out close to 100 billion messages. Again, it's 100 billion messages a year. And so you can imagine the amount of data that they're analyzing, which is in petabytes of data, and they need to do real time. And that's all possible because of the kind of analytics we have driven into the power It silver's, you know, using the latest of the Intel Intel Xeon processor couple with some of the technologies from the BGS side, which again I love them to go back in and analyze this data and service to the customers very rapidly. >>You know, it's funny. I think Mark Tech is kind of an under appreciated ah world of ai and, you know, in machine to machine execution, right, That's the amount of transactions go through when you load a webpage on your site that actually ideas who you are you know, puts puts a marketplace together, sells time on that or a spot on that ad and then lets people in is a really sophisticated, as you said in massive amounts of data going through the interesting stuff. If it's done right, it's magic. And if it's done, not right, then people get pissed off. You gotta have. You gotta have use our tools. >>You got it. I mean, this is where I talked about, you know, it can be garbage in garbage out if you don't really act on the right data. Right. So that is where I think it becomes important. But also, if you don't do it in a timely fashion, but you don't service up the right content at the right time. You miss the opportunity to go ahead and grab attention, >>right? Right. Lisa kind of back to you. Um, you know, there's all kinds of open source stuff that's happening also in the in the AI and machine learning world. So we hear things about tense or flow and and all these different libraries. How are you guys, you know, kind of embracing that world as you look at ai and kind of the development. We've been at it for a while. You guys are involved in everything from autonomous vehicles to the Mar Tech. Is we discussed? How are you making sure that these things were using all the available resources to optimize the solutions? >>Yeah, I think you and Robbie we're just hitting on some of those examples of how many ways people have figured out how to apply AI now. So maybe at first it was really driven by just image recognition and image tagging. But now you see so much work being driven in recommendation engines and an object detection for much more industrial use cases, not just consumer enjoyment and also those things you mentioned and hit on where the personalization is a really fine line you walk between. How do you make an experience feel good? Personalized versus creepy personalized is a real challenge and opportunity across so many industries. And so open source like you mentioned, is a great place for that foundation because it gives people the tools to build upon. And I think our strategy is really a stack strategy that starts first with delivering the best hardware for artificial intelligence and again the other is the foundation for that. But we also have, you know, Milat type processing for out of the Edge. And then we have all the way through to very custom specific accelerators into the data center, then on top about the optimized software, which is going into each of those frameworks and doing the work so that the framework recognizes the specific acceleration we built into the CPU. Whether that steel boost or recognizes the capabilities that sit in that accelerator silicon, and then once we've done that software layer and this is where we have the opportunity for a lot of partnership is the ecosystem and the solutions work that Robbie started off by talking about. So Ai isn't, um, it's not easy for everyone. It has a lot of value, but it takes work to extract that value. And so partnerships within the ecosystem to make sure that I see these are taking those optimization is building them in and fundamentally can deliver to customers. Reliable solution is the last leg of that of that strategy, but it really is one of the most important because without it you get a lot of really good benchmark results but not a lot of good, happy customer, >>right? I'm just curious, Lee says, because you kind of sit in the catbird seat. You guys at the core, you know, kind of under all the layers running data centers run these workloads. How >>do you see >>kind of the evolution of machine learning and ai from kind of the early days, where with science projects and and really smart people on mahogany row versus now people are talking about trying to get it to, like a citizen developer, but really a citizen data science and, you know, in exposing in the power of AI to business leaders or business executioners. Analysts, if you will, so they can apply it to their day to day world in their day to day life. How do you see that kind of evolving? Because you not only in it early, but you get to see some of the stuff coming down the road in design, find wins and reference architectures. How should people think about this evolution? >>It really is one of those things where if you step back from the fundamentals of AI, they've actually been around for 50 or more years. It's just that the changes in the amount of computing capability that's available, the network capacity that's available and the fundamental efficiency that I t and infrastructure managers and get out of their cloud architectures as allowed for this pervasiveness to evolve. And I think that's been the big tipping point that pushed people over this fear. Of course, I went through the same thing that cloud did where you had maybe every business leader or CEO saying Hey, get me a cloud and I'll figure out what for later give me some AI will get a week and make it work, But we're through those initial use pieces and starting to see a business value derived from from those deployments. And I think some of the most exciting areas are in the medical services field and just the amount, especially if you think of the environment we're in right now. The amount of efficiency and in some cases, reduction in human contact that you could require for diagnostics and just customer tracking and ability, ability to follow their entire patient History is really powerful and represents the next wave and care and how we scale our limited resource of doctors nurses technician. And the point we're making of what's coming next is where you start to see even more mass personalization and recommendations in that way that feel very not spooky to people but actually comforting. And they take value from them because it allows them to immediately act. Robbie reference to the speed at which you have to utilize the data. When people get immediately act more efficiently. They're generally happier with the service. So we see so much opportunity and we're continuing to address across, you know, again that hardware, software and solution stack so we can stay a step ahead of our customers, >>Right? That's great, Ravi. I want to give you the final word because you guys have to put the solutions together, it actually delivering to the customer. So not only, you know the hardware and the software, but any other kind of ecosystem components that you have to bring together. So I wonder if you can talk about that approach and how you know it's it's really the solution. At the end of the day, not specs, not speeds and feeds. That's not really what people care about. It's really a good solution. >>Yeah, three like Jeff, because end of the day I mean, it's like this. Most of us probably use the A team to retry money, but we really don't know what really sits behind 80 and my point being that you really care at that particular point in time to be able to put a radio do machine and get your dollar bills out, for example. Likewise, when you start looking at what the customer really needs to know, what Lisa hit upon is actually right. I mean what they're looking for. And you said this on the whole solution side house. To our our mantra to this is very simple. We want to make sure that we use the right basic building blocks, ensuring that we bring the right solutions using three things the right products which essentially means that we need to use the right partners to get the right processes in GPU Xen. But then >>we get >>to the next level by ensuring that we can actually do things we can either provide no ready solutions are validated reference architectures being that you have the sausage making process that you now don't need to have the customer go through, right? In a way. We have done the cooking and we provide a recipe book and you just go through the ingredient process of peering does and then off your off right to go get your solution done. And finally, the final stages there might be helped that customers still need in terms of services. That's something else Dell technology provides. And the whole idea is that customers want to go out and have them help deploying the solutions. We can also do that we're services. So that's probably the way we approach our data. The way we approach, you know, providing the building blocks are using the right technologies from our partners, then making sure that we have the right solutions that our customers can look at. And finally, they need deployment. Help weaken due their services. >>Well, Robbie, Lisa, thanks for taking a few minutes. That was a great tee up, Rob, because I think we're gonna go to a customer a couple of customer interviews enjoying that nice meal that you prepared with that combination of hardware, software, services and support. So thank you for your time and a great to catch up. All right, let's go and run the tape. Hi, Jeff. I wanted to talk about two examples of collaboration that we have with the partners that have yielded Ah, really examples of ah put through HPC and AI activities. So the first example that I wanted to cover is within your AHMAD team up in Canada with that team. We collaborated with Intel on a tuning of algorithm and code in order to accelerate the mapping of the human brain. So we have a cluster down here in Texas called Zenith based on Z on and obtain memory on. And we were able to that customer with the three of us are friends and Intel the norm, our team on the Dell HPC on data innovation, injuring team to go and accelerate the mapping of the human brain. So imagine patients playing video games or doing all sorts of activities that help understand how the brain sends the signal in order to trigger a response of the nervous system. And it's not only good, good way to map the human brain, but think about what you can get with that type of information in order to help cure Alzheimer's or dementia down the road. So this is really something I'm passionate about. Is using technology to help all of us on all of those that are suffering from those really tough diseases? Yeah, yeah, way >>boil. I'm a project manager for the project, and the idea is actually to scan six participants really intensively in both the memory scanner and the G scanner and see if we can use human brain data to get closer to something called Generalized Intelligence. What we have in the AI world, the systems that are mathematically computational, built often they do one task really, really well, but they struggle with other tasks. Really good example. This is video games. Artificial neural nets can often outperform humans and video games, but they don't really play in a natural way. Artificial neural net. Playing Mario Brothers The way that it beats the system is by actually kind of gliding its way through as quickly as possible. And it doesn't like collect pennies. For example, if you play Mary Brothers as a child, you know that collecting those coins is part of your game. And so the idea is to get artificial neural nets to behave more like humans. So like we have Transfer of knowledge is just something that humans do really, really well and very naturally. It doesn't take 50,000 examples for a child to know the difference between a dog and a hot dog when you eat when you play with. But an artificial neural net can often take massive computational power and many examples before it understands >>that video games are awesome, because when you do video game, you're doing a vision task instant. You're also doing a >>lot of planning and strategy thinking, but >>you're also taking decisions you several times a second, and we record that we try to see. Can we from brain activity predict >>what people were doing? We can break almost 90% accuracy with this type of architecture. >>Yeah, yeah, >>Use I was the lead posts. Talk on this collaboration with Dell and Intel. She's trying to work on a model called Graph Convolution Neural nets. >>We have being involved like two computing systems to compare it, like how the performance >>was voting for The lab relies on both servers that we have internally here, so I have a GPU server, but what we really rely on is compute Canada and Compute Canada is just not powerful enough to be able to run the models that he was trying to run so it would take her days. Weeks it would crash, would have to wait in line. Dell was visiting, and I was invited into the meeting very kindly, and they >>told us that they started working with a new >>type of hardware to train our neural nets. >>Dell's using traditional CPU use, pairing it with a new >>type off memory developed by Intel. Which thing? They also >>their new CPU architectures and really optimized to do deep learning. So all of that sounds great because we had this problem. We run out of memory, >>the innovation lab having access to experts to help answer questions immediately. That's not something to gate. >>We were able to train the attic snatch within 20 minutes. But before we do the same thing, all the GPU we need to wait almost three hours to each one simple way we >>were able to train the short original neural net. Dell has been really great cause anytime we need more memory, we send an email, Dell says. Yeah, sure, no problem. We'll extended how much memory do you need? It's been really simple from our end, and I think it's really great to be at the edge of science and technology. We're not just doing the same old. We're pushing the boundaries. Like often. We don't know where we're going to be in six months. In the big data world computing power makes a big difference. >>Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. The second example I'd like to cover is the one that will call the data accelerator. That's a publisher that we have with the University of Cambridge, England. There we partnered with Intel on Cambridge, and we built up at the time the number one Io 500 storage solution on. And it's pretty amazing because it was built on standard building blocks, power edge servers until Xeon processors some envy me drives from our partners and Intel. And what we did is we. Both of this system with a very, very smart and elaborate suffering code that gives an ultra fast performance for our customers, are looking for a front and fast scratch to their HPC storage solutions. We're also very mindful that this innovation is great for others to leverage, so the suffering Could will soon be available on Get Hub on. And, as I said, this was number one on the Iot 500 was initially released >>within Cambridge with always out of focus on opening up our technologies to UK industry, where we can encourage UK companies to take advantage of advanced research computing technologies way have many customers in the fields of automotive gas life sciences find our systems really help them accelerate their product development process. Manage Poor Khalidiya. I'm the director of research computing at Cambridge University. Yeah, we are a research computing cloud provider, but the emphasis is on the consulting on the processes around how to exploit that technology rather than the better results. Our value is in how we help businesses use advanced computing resources rather than the provision. Those results we see increasingly more and more data being produced across a wide range of verticals, life sciences, astronomy, manufacturing. So the data accelerators that was created as a component within our data center compute environment. Data processing is becoming more and more central element within research computing. We're getting very large data sets, traditional spinning disk file systems can't keep up and we find applications being slowed down due to a lack of data, So the data accelerator was born to take advantage of new solid state storage devices. I tried to work out how we can have a a staging mechanism for keeping your data on spinning disk when it's not required pre staging it on fast envy any stories? Devices so that can feed the applications at the rate quiet for maximum performance. So we have the highest AI capability available anywhere in the UK, where we match II compute performance Very high stories performance Because for AI, high performance storage is a key element to get the performance up. Currently, the data accelerated is the fastest HPC storage system in the world way are able to obtain 500 gigabytes a second read write with AI ops up in the 20 million range. We provide advanced computing technologies allow some of the brightest minds in the world really pushed scientific and medical research. We enable some of the greatest academics in the world to make tomorrow's discoveries. Yeah, yeah, yeah. >>Alright, Welcome back, Jeff Frick here and we're excited for this next segment. We're joined by Jeremy Raider. He is the GM digital transformation and scale solutions for Intel Corporation. Jeremy, great to see you. Hey, thanks for having me. I love I love the flowers in the backyard. I thought maybe you ran over to the Japanese, the Japanese garden or the Rose Garden, Right To very beautiful places to visit in Portland. >>Yeah. You know, you only get him for a couple. Ah, couple weeks here, so we get the timing just right. >>Excellent. All right, so let's jump into it. Really? And in this conversation really is all about making Ai Riel. Um, and you guys are working with Dell and you're working with not only Dell, right? There's the hardware and software, but a lot of these smaller a solution provider. So what is some of the key attributes that that needs to make ai riel for your customers out there? >>Yeah, so, you know, it's a it's a complex space. So when you can bring the best of the intel portfolio, which is which is expanding a lot, you know, it's not just the few anymore you're getting into Memory technologies, network technologies and kind of a little less known as how many resources we have focused on the software side of things optimizing frameworks and optimizing, and in these key ingredients and libraries that you can stitch into that portfolio to really get more performance in value, out of your machine learning and deep learning space. And so you know what we've really done here with Dell? It has started to bring a bunch of that portfolio together with Dell's capabilities, and then bring in that ai's V partner, that software vendor where we can really take and stitch and bring the most value out of that broad portfolio, ultimately using using the complexity of what it takes to deploy an AI capability. So a lot going on. They're bringing kind of the three legged stool of the software vendor hardware vendor dental into the mix, and you get a really strong outcome, >>right? So before we get to the solutions piece, let's stick a little bit into the Intel world. And I don't know if a lot of people are aware that obviously you guys make CPUs and you've been making great CPIs forever. But there's a whole lot more stuff that you've added, you know, kind of around the core CPU. If you will in terms of of actual libraries and ways to really optimize the seond processors to operate in an AI world. I wonder if you can kind of take us a little bit below the surface on how that works. What are some of the examples of things you can do to get more from your Gambira Intel processors for ai specific applications of workloads? >>Yeah, well, you know, there's a ton of software optimization that goes into this. You know that having the great CPU is definitely step one. But ultimately you want to get down into the libraries like tensor flow. We have data analytics, acceleration libraries. You know, that really allows you to get kind of again under the covers a little bit and look at it. How do we have to get the most out of the kinds of capabilities that are ultimately used in machine learning in deep learning capabilities, and then bring that forward and trying and enable that with our software vendors so that they can take advantage of those acceleration components and ultimately, you know, move from, you know, less training time or could be a the cost factor. But those are the kind of capabilities we want to expose to software vendors do these kinds of partnerships. >>Okay. Ah, and that's terrific. And I do think that's a big part of the story that a lot of people are probably not as aware of that. There are a lot of these optimization opportunities that you guys have been leveraging for a while. So shifting gears a little bit, right? AI and machine learning is all about the data. And in doing a little research for this, I found actually you on stage talking about some company that had, like, 350 of road off, 315 petabytes of data, 140,000 sources of those data. And I think probably not great quote of six months access time to get that's right and actually work with it. And the company you're referencing was intel. So you guys know a lot about debt data, managing data, everything from your manufacturing, and obviously supporting a global organization for I t and run and ah, a lot of complexity and secrets and good stuff. So you know what have you guys leveraged as intel in the way you work with data and getting a good data pipeline. That's enabling you to kind of put that into these other solutions that you're providing to the customers, >>right? Well, it is, You know, it's absolutely a journey, and it doesn't happen overnight, and that's what we've you know. We've seen it at Intel on We see it with many of our customers that are on the same journey that we've been on. And so you know, this idea of building that pipeline it really starts with what kind of problems that you're trying to solve. What are the big issues that are holding you back that company where you see that competitive advantage that you're trying to get to? And then ultimately, how do you build the structure to enable the right kind of pipeline of that data? Because that's that's what machine learning and deep learning is that data journey. So really a lot of focus around you know how we can understand those business challenges bring forward those kinds of capabilities along the way through to where we structure our entire company around those assets and then ultimately some of the partnerships that we're gonna be talking about these companies that are out there to help us really squeeze the most out of that data as quickly as possible because otherwise it goes stale real fast, sits on the shelf and you're not getting that value out of right. So, yeah, we've been on the journey. It's Ah, it's a long journey, but ultimately we could take a lot of those those kind of learnings and we can apply them to our silicon technology. The software optimization is that we're doing and ultimately, how we talk to our enterprise customers about how they can solve overcome some of the same challenges that we did. >>Well, let's talk about some of those challenges specifically because, you know, I think part of the the challenge is that kind of knocked big data, if you will in Hadoop, if you will kind of off the rails. Little bit was there's a whole lot that goes into it. Besides just doing the analysis, there's a lot of data practice data collection, data organization, a whole bunch of things that have to happen before. You can actually start to do the sexy stuff of AI. So you know, what are some of those challenges. How are you helping people get over kind of these baby steps before they can really get into the deep end of the pool? >>Yeah, well, you know, one is you have to have the resource is so you know, do you even have the resource is if you can acquire those Resource is can you keep them interested in the kind of work that you're doing? So that's a big challenge on and actually will talk about how that fits into some of the partnerships that we've been establishing in the ecosystem. It's also you get stuck in this poc do loop, right? You finally get those resource is and they start to get access to that data that we talked about. It start to play out some scenarios, a theorize a little bit. Maybe they show you some really interesting value, but it never seems to make its way into a full production mode. And I think that is a challenge that has faced so many enterprises that are stuck in that loop. And so that's where we look at who's out there in the ecosystem that can help more readily move through that whole process of the evaluation that proved the r a y, the POC and ultimately move that thing that capability into production mode as quickly as possible that you know that to me is one of those fundamental aspects of if you're stuck in the POC. Nothing's happening from this. This is not helping your company. We want to move things more quickly, >>right? Right. And let's just talk about some of these companies that you guys are working with that you've got some reference architectures is data robot a Grid dynamics H 20 just down the road in Antigua. So a lot of the companies we've worked with with Cube and I think you know another part that's interesting. It again we can learn from kind of old days of big data is kind of generalized. Ai versus solution specific. Ai and I think you know where there's a real opportunity is not AI for a sake, but really it's got to be applied to a specific solution, a specific problem so that you have, you know, better chatbots, better customer service experience, you know, better something. So when you were working with these folks and trying to design solutions or some of the opportunities that you saw to work with some of these folks to now have an applied a application slash solution versus just kind of AI for ai's sake. >>Yeah. I mean, that could be anything from fraud, detection and financial services, or even taking a step back and looking more horizontally like back to that data challenge. If if you're stuck at the AI built a fantastic Data lake, but I haven't been able to pull anything back out of it, who are some of the companies that are out there that can help overcome some of those big data challenges and ultimately get you to where you know, you don't have a data scientist spending 60% of their time on data acquisition pre processing? That's not where we want them, right? We want them on building out that next theory. We want them on looking at the next business challenge. We want them on selecting the right models, but ultimately they have to do that as quickly as possible so that they can move that that capability forward into the next phase. So, really, it's about that that connection of looking at those those problems or challenges in the whole pipeline. And these companies like data robot in H 20 quasi. Oh, they're all addressing specific challenges in the end to end. That's why they've kind of bubbled up as ones that we want to continue to collaborate with, because it can help enterprises overcome those issues more fast. You know more readily. >>Great. Well, Jeremy, thanks for taking a few minutes and giving us the Intel side of the story. Um, it's a great company has been around forever. I worked there many, many moons ago. That's Ah, that's a story for another time, but really appreciate it and I'll interview you will go there. Alright, so super. Thanks a lot. So he's Jeremy. I'm Jeff Frick. So now it's time to go ahead and jump into the crowd chat. It's crowdchat dot net slash make ai real. Um, we'll see you in the chat. And thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world. She is the corporate VP and GM Ravi, great to see you as well. Good to see you on beast. solutions where if you can take us through that reference architectures and ready solutions so that the customer really doesn't have to on family and what you guys are doing in the data center with this kind of new interesting thing called AI and And so if you think about meeting toe, have your hardware foundation part of the intelligence that you can optimize betters is so important as you said Lisa and also Rocket and the solution we have driven into the power It silver's, you know, using the latest of the Intel Intel of ai and, you know, in machine to machine execution, right, That's the amount of transactions I mean, this is where I talked about, you know, How are you guys, you know, kind of embracing that world as you look But we also have, you know, Milat type processing for out of the Edge. you know, kind of under all the layers running data centers run these workloads. and, you know, in exposing in the power of AI to business leaders or business the speed at which you have to utilize the data. So I wonder if you can talk about that approach and how you know to retry money, but we really don't know what really sits behind 80 and my point being that you The way we approach, you know, providing the building blocks are using the right technologies the brain sends the signal in order to trigger a response of the nervous know the difference between a dog and a hot dog when you eat when you play with. that video games are awesome, because when you do video game, you're doing a vision task instant. that we try to see. We can break almost 90% accuracy with this Talk on this collaboration with Dell and Intel. to be able to run the models that he was trying to run so it would take her days. They also So all of that the innovation lab having access to experts to help answer questions immediately. do the same thing, all the GPU we need to wait almost three hours to each one do you need? That's a publisher that we have with the University of Cambridge, England. Devices so that can feed the applications at the rate quiet for maximum performance. I thought maybe you ran over to the Japanese, the Japanese garden or the Rose Ah, couple weeks here, so we get the timing just right. Um, and you guys are working with Dell and you're working with not only Dell, right? the intel portfolio, which is which is expanding a lot, you know, it's not just the few anymore What are some of the examples of things you can do to get more from You know, that really allows you to get kind of again under the covers a little bit and look at it. So you know what have you guys leveraged as intel in the way you work with data and getting And then ultimately, how do you build the structure to enable the right kind of pipeline of that is that kind of knocked big data, if you will in Hadoop, if you will kind of off the rails. Yeah, well, you know, one is you have to have the resource is so you know, do you even have the So a lot of the companies we've worked with with Cube and I think you know another that can help overcome some of those big data challenges and ultimately get you to where you we'll see you in the chat.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeremy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Spelman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Texas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Robbie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Portland | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Xeon Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ravi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
60% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jeremy Raider | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ravi Pinter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mar Tech | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50,000 examples | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mario Brothers | TITLE | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Antigua | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
University of Cambridge | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jersey | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
140,000 sources | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six participants | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
315 petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
500 gigabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AHMAD | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first example | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Memory Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two examples | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cambridge University | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Rose Garden | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
both servers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Intel Corporation | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Khalidiya | PERSON | 0.98+ |
second example | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one task | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
80 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Epsilon | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Rocket | PERSON | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Full Keynote Hour - DockerCon 2020
(water running) (upbeat music) (electric buzzing) >> Fuel up! (upbeat music) (audience clapping) (upbeat music) >> Announcer: From around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of DockerCon live 2020, brought to you by Docker and its ecosystem partners. >> Hello everyone, welcome to DockerCon 2020. I'm John Furrier with theCUBE I'm in our Palo Alto studios with our quarantine crew. We have a great lineup here for DockerCon 2020. Virtual event, normally it was in person face to face. I'll be with you throughout the day from an amazing lineup of content, over 50 different sessions, cube tracks, keynotes, and we've got two great co-hosts here with Docker, Jenny Burcio and Bret Fisher. We'll be with you all day today, taking you through the program, helping you navigate the sessions. I'm so excited. Jenny, this is a virtual event. We talk about this. Can you believe it? Maybe the internet gods be with us today and hope everyone's having-- >> Yes. >> Easy time getting in. Jenny, Bret, thank you for-- >> Hello. >> Being here. >> Hey. >> Hi everyone, so great to see everyone chatting and telling us where they're from. Welcome to the Docker community. We have a great day planned for you. >> Guys great job getting this all together. I know how hard it is. These virtual events are hard to pull off. I'm blown away by the community at Docker. The amount of sessions that are coming in the sponsor support has been amazing. Just the overall excitement around the brand and the opportunities given this tough times where we're in. It's super exciting again, made the internet gods be with us throughout the day, but there's plenty of content. Bret's got an amazing all day marathon group of people coming in and chatting. Jenny, this has been an amazing journey and it's a great opportunity. Tell us about the virtual event. Why DockerCon virtual. Obviously everyone's canceling their events, but this is special to you guys. Talk about DockerCon virtual this year. >> The Docker community shows up at DockerCon every year, and even though we didn't have the opportunity to do an in person event this year, we didn't want to lose the time that we all come together at DockerCon. The conversations, the amazing content and learning opportunities. So we decided back in December to make DockerCon a virtual event. And of course when we did that, there was no quarantine we didn't expect, you know, I certainly didn't expect to be delivering it from my living room, but we were just, I mean we were completely blown away. There's nearly 70,000 people across the globe that have registered for DockerCon today. And when you look at DockerCon of past right live events, really and we're learning are just the tip of the iceberg and so thrilled to be able to deliver a more inclusive global event today. And we have so much planned I think. Bret, you want to tell us some of the things that you have planned? >> Well, I'm sure I'm going to forget something 'cause there's a lot going on. But, we've obviously got interviews all day today on this channel with John and the crew. Jenny has put together an amazing set of all these speakers, and then you have the captain's on deck, which is essentially the YouTube live hangout where we just basically talk shop. It's all engineers, all day long. Captains and special guests. And we're going to be in chat talking to you about answering your questions. Maybe we'll dig into some stuff based on the problems you're having or the questions you have. Maybe there'll be some random demos, but it's basically not scripted, it's an all day long unscripted event. So I'm sure it's going to be a lot of fun hanging out in there. >> Well guys, I want to just say it's been amazing how you structured this so everyone has a chance to ask questions, whether it's informal laid back in the captain's channel or in the sessions, where the speakers will be there with their presentations. But Jenny, I want to get your thoughts because we have a site out there that's structured a certain way for the folks watching. If you're on your desktop, there's a main stage hero. There's then tracks and Bret's running the captain's tracks. You can click on that link and jump into his session all day long. He's got an amazing set of line of sleet, leaning back, having a good time. And then each of the tracks, you can jump into those sessions. It's on a clock, it'll be available on demand. All that content is available if you're on your desktop. If you're on your mobile, it's the same thing. Look at the calendar, find the session that you want. If you're interested in it, you could watch it live and chat with the participants in real time or watch it on demand. So there's plenty of content to navigate through. We do have it on a clock and we'll be streaming sessions as they happen. So you're in the moment and that's a great time to chat in real time. But there's more, Jenny, getting more out of this event. You guys try to bring together the stimulation of community. How does the participants get more out of the the event besides just consuming some of the content all day today? >> Yes, so first set up your profile, put your picture next to your chat handle and then chat. John said we have various setups today to help you get the most out of your experience are breakout sessions. The content is prerecorded, so you get quality content and the speakers and chat so you can ask questions the whole time. If you're looking for the hallway track, then definitely check out the captain's on deck channel. And then we have some great interviews all day on the queue. So set up your profile, join the conversation and be kind, right? This is a community event. Code of conduct is linked on every page at the top, and just have a great day. >> And Bret, you guys have an amazing lineup on the captain, so you have a great YouTube channel that you have your stream on. So the folks who were familiar with that can get that either on YouTube or on the site. The chat is integrated in, So you're set up, what do you got going on? Give us the highlights. What are you excited about throughout your day? Take us through your program on the captains. That's going to be probably pretty dynamic in the chat too. >> Yeah, so I'm sure we're going to have lots of, stuff going on in chat. So no cLancaerns there about, having crickets in the chat. But we're going to be basically starting the day with two of my good Docker captain friends, (murmurs) and Laura Taco. And we're going to basically start you out and at the end of this keynote, at the end of this hour and we're going to get you going and then you can maybe jump out and go to take some sessions. Maybe there's some stuff you want to check out and other sessions that you want to chat and talk with the instructors, the speakers there, and then you're going to come back to us, right? Or go over, check out the interviews. So the idea is you're hopping back and forth and throughout the day we're basically changing out every hour. We're not just changing out the guests basically, but we're also changing out the topics that we can cover because different guests will have different expertise. We're going to have some special guests in from Microsoft, talk about some of the cool stuff going on there, and basically it's captains all day long. And if you've been on my YouTube live show you've watched that, you've seen a lot of the guests we have on there. I'm lucky to just hang out with all these really awesome people around the world, so it's going to be fun. >> Awesome and the content again has been preserved. You guys had a great session on call for paper sessions. Jenny, this is good stuff. What other things can people do to make it interesting? Obviously we're looking for suggestions. Feel free to chirp on Twitter about ideas that can be new. But you guys got some surprises. There's some selfies, what else? What's going on? Any secret, surprises throughout the day. >> There are secret surprises throughout the day. You'll need to pay attention to the keynotes. Bret will have giveaways. I know our wonderful sponsors have giveaways planned as well in their sessions. Hopefully right you feel conflicted about what you're going to attend. So do know that everything is recorded and will be available on demand afterwards so you can catch anything that you miss. Most of them will be available right after they stream the initial time. >> All right, great stuff, so they've got the Docker selfie. So the Docker selfies, the hashtag is just DockerCon hashtag DockerCon. If you feel like you want to add some of the hashtag no problem, check out the sessions. You can pop in and out of the captains is kind of the cool kids are going to be hanging out with Bret and then all they'll knowledge and learning. Don't miss the keynote, the keynote should be solid. We've got chain Governor from red monk delivering a keynote. I'll be interviewing him live after his keynote. So stay with us. And again, check out the interactive calendar. All you got to do is look at the calendar and click on the session you want. You'll jump right in. Hop around, give us feedback. We're doing our best. Bret, any final thoughts on what you want to share to the community around, what you got going on the virtual event, just random thoughts? >> Yeah, so sorry we can't all be together in the same physical place. But the coolest thing about as business online, is that we actually get to involve everyone, so as long as you have a computer and internet, you can actually attend DockerCon if you've never been to one before. So we're trying to recreate that experience online. Like Jenny said, the code of conduct is important. So, we're all in this together with the chat, so try to be nice in there. These are all real humans that, have feelings just like me. So let's try to keep it cool. And, over in the Catherine's channel we'll be taking your questions and maybe playing some music, playing some games, giving away some free stuff, while you're, in between sessions learning, oh yeah. >> And I got to say props to your rig. You've got an amazing setup there, Bret. I love what your show, you do. It's really bad ass and kick ass. So great stuff. Jenny sponsors ecosystem response to this event has been phenomenal. The attendance 67,000. We're seeing a surge of people hitting the site now. So if you're not getting in, just, Wade's going, we're going to crank through the queue, but the sponsors on the ecosystem really delivered on the content side and also the sport. You want to share a few shout outs on the sponsors who really kind of helped make this happen. >> Yeah, so definitely make sure you check out the sponsor pages and you go, each page is the actual content that they will be delivering. So they are delivering great content to you. So you can learn and a huge thank you to our platinum and gold authors. >> Awesome, well I got to say, I'm super impressed. I'm looking forward to the Microsoft Amazon sessions, which are going to be good. And there's a couple of great customer sessions there. I tweeted this out last night and let them get you guys' reaction to this because there's been a lot of talk around the COVID crisis that we're in, but there's also a positive upshot to this is Cambridge and explosion of developers that are going to be building new apps. And I said, you know, apps aren't going to just change the world, they're going to save the world. So a lot of the theme here is the impact that developers are having right now in the current situation. If we get the goodness of compose and all the things going on in Docker and the relationships, this real impact happening with the developer community. And it's pretty evident in the program and some of the talks and some of the examples. how containers and microservices are certainly changing the world and helping save the world, your thoughts. >> Like you said, a number of sessions and interviews in the program today that really dive into that. And even particularly around COVID, Clement Beyondo is sharing his company's experience, from being able to continue operations in Italy when they were completely shut down beginning of March. We have also in theCUBE channel several interviews about from the national Institute of health and precision cancer medicine at the end of the day. And you just can really see how containerization and developers are moving in industry and really humanity forward because of what they're able to build and create, with advances in technology. >> Yeah and the first responders and these days is developers. Bret compose is getting a lot of traction on Twitter. I can see some buzz already building up. There's huge traction with compose, just the ease of use and almost a call for arms for integrating into all the system language libraries, I mean, what's going on with compose? I mean, what's the captain say about this? I mean, it seems to be really tracking in terms of demand and interest. >> I think we're over 700,000 composed files on GitHub. So it's definitely beyond just the standard Docker run commands. It's definitely the next tool that people use to run containers. Just by having that we just buy, and that's not even counting. I mean that's just counting the files that are named Docker compose YAML. So I'm sure a lot of you out there have created a YAML file to manage your local containers or even on a server with Docker compose. And the nice thing is is Docker is doubling down on that. So we've gotten some news recently, from them about what they want to do with opening the spec up, getting more companies involved because compose is already gathered so much interest from the community. You know, AWS has importers, there's Kubernetes importers for it. So there's more stuff coming and we might just see something here in a few minutes. >> All right, well let's get into the keynote guys, jump into the keynote. If you missing anything, come back to the stream, check out the sessions, check out the calendar. Let's go, let's have a great time. Have some fun, thanks and enjoy the rest of the day we'll see you soon. (upbeat music) (upbeat music) >> Okay, what is the name of that Whale? >> Molly. >> And what is the name of this Whale? >> Mobby. >> That's right, dad's got to go, thanks bud. >> Bye. >> Bye. Hi, I'm Scott Johnson, CEO of Docker and welcome to DockerCon 2020. This year DockerCon is an all virtual event with more than 60,000 members of the Docker Community joining from around the world. And with the global shelter in place policies, we're excited to offer a unifying, inclusive virtual community event in which anyone and everyone can participate from their home. As a company, Docker has been through a lot of changes since our last DockerCon last year. The most important starting last November, is our refocusing 100% on developers and development teams. As part of that refocusing, one of the big challenges we've been working on, is how to help development teams quickly and efficiently get their app from code to cloud And wouldn't it be cool, if developers could quickly deploy to the cloud right from their local environment with the commands and workflow they already know. We're excited to give you a sneak preview of what we've been working on. And rather than slides, we thought we jumped right into the product. And joining me demonstrate some of these cool new features, is enclave your DACA. One of our engineers here at Docker working on Docker compose. Hello Lanca. >> Hello. >> We're going to show how an application development team collaborates using Docker desktop and Docker hub. And then deploys the app directly from the Docker command line to the clouds in just two commands. A development team would use this to quickly share functional changes of their app with the product management team, with beta testers or other development teams. Let's go ahead and take a look at our app. Now, this is a web app, that randomly pulls words from the database, and assembles them into sentences. You can see it's a pretty typical three tier application with each tier implemented in its own container. We have a front end web service, a middle tier, which implements the logic to randomly pull the words from the database and assemble them and a backend database. And here you can see the database uses the Postgres official image from Docker hub. Now let's first run the app locally using Docker command line and the Docker engine in Docker desktop. We'll do a Doc compose up and you can see that it's pulling the containers from our Docker organization account. Wordsmith, inc. Now that it's up. Let's go ahead and look at local host and we'll confirm that the application is functioning as desired. So there's one sentence, let's pull and now you and you can indeed see that we are pulling random words and assembling into sentences. Now you can also see though that the look and feel is a bit dated. And so Lanca is going to show us how easy it is to make changes and share them with the rest of the team. Lanca, over to you. >> Thank you, so I have, the source code of our application on my machine and I have updated it with the latest team from DockerCon 2020. So before committing the code, I'm going to build the application locally and run it, to verify that indeed the changes are good. So I'm going to build with Docker compose the image for the web service. Now that the image has been built, I'm going to deploy it locally. Wait to compose up. We can now check the dashboard in a Docker desktop that indeed our containers are up and running, and we can access, we can open in the web browser, the end point for the web service. So as we can see, we have the latest changes in for our application. So as you can see, the application has been updated successfully. So now, I'm going to push the image that I have just built to my organization's shared repository on Docker hub. So I can do this with Docker compose push web. Now that the image has been updated in the Docker hub repository, or my teammates can access it and check the changes. >> Excellent, well, thank you Lanca. Now of course, in these times, video conferencing is the new normal, and as great as it is, video conferencing does not allow users to actually test the application. And so, to allow us to have our app be accessible by others outside organizations such as beta testers or others, let's go ahead and deploy to the cloud. >> Sure we, can do this by employing a context. A Docker context, is a mechanism that we can use to target different platforms for deploying containers. The context we hold, information as the endpoint for the platform, and also how to authenticate to it. So I'm going to list the context that I have set locally. As you can see, I'm currently using the default context that is pointing to my local Docker engine. So all the commands that I have issued so far, we're targeting my local engine. Now, in order to deploy the application on a cloud. I have an account in the Azure Cloud, where I have no resource running currently, and I have created for this account, dedicated context that will hold the information on how to connect it to it. So now all I need to do, is to switch to this context, with Docker context use, and the name of my cloud context. So all the commands that I'm going to run, from now on, are going to target the cloud platform. So we can also check very, more simpler, in a simpler way we can check the running containers with Docker PS. So as we see no container is running in my cloud account. Now to deploy the application, all I need to do is to run a Docker compose up. And this will trigger the deployment of my application. >> Thanks Lanca. Now notice that Lanca did not have to move the composed file from Docker desktop to Azure. Notice you have to make any changes to the Docker compose file, and nor did she change any of the containers that she and I were using locally in our local environments. So the same composed file, same images, run locally and upon Azure without changes. While the app is deploying to Azure, let's highlight some of the features in Docker hub that helps teams with remote first collaboration. So first, here's our team's account where it (murmurs) and you can see the updated container sentences web that Lanca just pushed a couple of minutes ago. As far as collaboration, we can add members using their Docker ID or their email, and then we can organize them into different teams depending on their role in the application development process. So and then Lancae they're organized into different teams, we can assign them permissions, so that teams can work in parallel without stepping on each other's changes accidentally. For example, we'll give the engineering team full read, write access, whereas the product management team will go ahead and just give read only access. So this role based access controls, is just one of the many features in Docker hub that allows teams to collaboratively and quickly develop applications. Okay Lanca, how's our app doing? >> Our app has been successfully deployed to the cloud. So, we can easily check either the Azure portal to verify the containers running for it or simpler we can run a Docker PS again to get the list with the containers that have been deployed for it. In the output from the Docker PS, we can see an end point that we can use to access our application in the web browser. So we can see the application running in clouds. It's really up to date and now we can take this particular endpoint and share it within our organization such that anybody can have a look at it. >> That's cool Onka. We showed how we can deploy an app to the cloud in minutes and just two commands, and using commands that Docker users already know, thanks so much. In that sneak preview, you saw a team developing an app collaboratively, with a tool chain that includes Docker desktop and Docker hub. And simply by switching Docker context from their local environment to the cloud, deploy that app to the cloud, to Azure without leaving the command line using Docker commands they already know. And in doing so, really simplifying for development team, getting their app from code to cloud. And just as important, what you did not see, was a lot of complexity. You did not see cloud specific interfaces, user management or security. You did not see us having to provision and configure compute networking and storage resources in the cloud. And you did not see infrastructure specific application changes to either the composed file or the Docker images. And by simplifying a way that complexity, these new features help application DevOps teams, quickly iterate and get their ideas, their apps from code to cloud, and helping development teams, build share and run great applications, is what Docker is all about. A Docker is able to simplify for development teams getting their app from code to cloud quickly as a result of standards, products and ecosystem partners. It starts with open standards for applications and application artifacts, and active open source communities around those standards to ensure portability and choice. Then as you saw in the demo, the Docker experience delivered by Docker desktop and Docker hub, simplifies a team's collaborative development of applications, and together with ecosystem partners provides every stage of an application development tool chain. For example, deploying applications to the cloud in two commands. What you saw on the demo, well that's an extension of our strategic partnership with Microsoft, which we announced yesterday. And you can learn more about our partnership from Amanda Silver from Microsoft later today, right here at DockerCon. Another tool chain stage, the capability to scan applications for security and vulnerabilities, as a result of our partnership with Sneak, which we announced last week. You can learn more about that partnership from Peter McKay, CEO Sneak, again later today, right here at DockerCon. A third example, development team can automate the build of container images upon a simple get push, as a result of Docker hub integrations with GitHub and Alaska and Bitbucket. As a final example of Docker and the ecosystem helping teams quickly build applications, together with our ISV partners. We offer in Docker hub over 500 official and verified publisher images of ready to run Dockerized application components such as databases, load balancers, programming languages, and much more. Of course, none of this happens without people. And I would like to take a moment to thank four groups of people in particular. First, the Docker team, past and present. We've had a challenging 12 months including a restructuring and then a global pandemic, and yet their support for each other, and their passion for the product, this community and our customers has never been stronger. We think our community, Docker wouldn't be Docker without you, and whether you're one of the 50 Docker captains, they're almost 400 meetup organizers, the thousands of contributors and maintainers. Every day you show up, you give back, you teach new support. We thank our users, more than six and a half million developers who have built more than 7 million applications and are then sharing those applications through Docker hub at a rate of more than one and a half billion poles per week. Those apps are then run, are more than 44 million Docker engines. And finally, we thank our customers, the over 18,000 docker subscribers, both individual developers and development teams from startups to large organizations, 60% of which are outside the United States. And they spend every industry vertical, from media, to entertainment to manufacturing. healthcare and much more. Thank you. Now looking forward, given these unprecedented times, we would like to offer a challenge. While it would be easy to feel helpless and miss this global pandemic, the challenge is for us as individuals and as a community to instead see and grasp the tremendous opportunities before us to be forces for good. For starters, look no further than the pandemic itself, in the fight against this global disaster, applications and data are playing a critical role, and the Docker Community quickly recognize this and rose to the challenge. There are over 600 COVID-19 related publicly available projects on Docker hub today, from data processing to genome analytics to data visualization folding at home. The distributed computing project for simulating protein dynamics, is also available on Docker hub, and it uses spirit compute capacity to analyze COVID-19 proteins to aid in the design of new therapies. And right here at DockerCon, you can hear how Clemente Biondo and his company engineering in Gagne area Informatica are using Docker in the fight with COVID-19 in Italy every day. Now, in addition to fighting the pandemic directly, as a community, we also have an opportunity to bridge the disruption the pandemic is wreaking. It's impacting us at work and at home in every country around the world and every aspect of our lives. For example, many of you have a student at home, whose world is going to be very different when they returned to school. As employees, all of us have experienced the stresses from working from home as well as many of the benefits and in fact 75% of us say that going forward, we're going to continue to work from home at least occasionally. And of course one of the biggest disruptions has been job losses, over 35 million in the United States alone. And we know that's affected many of you. And yet your skills are in such demand and so important now more than ever. And that's why here at DockerCon, we want to try to do our part to help, and we're promoting this hashtag on Twitter, hashtag DockerCon jobs, where job seekers and those offering jobs can reach out to one another and connect. Now, pandemics disruption is accelerating the shift of more and more of our time, our priorities, our dollars from offline to online to hybrid, and even online only ways of living. We need to find new ways to collaborate, new approaches to engage customers, new modes for education and much more. And what is going to fill the needs created by this acceleration from offline, online? New applications. And it's this need, this demand for all these new applications that represents a great opportunity for the Docker community of developers. The world needs us, needs you developers now more than ever. So let's seize this moment. Let us in our teams, go build share and run great new applications. Thank you for joining today. And let's have a great DockerCon. >> Okay, welcome back to the DockerCon studio headquarters in your hosts, Jenny Burcio and myself John Furrier. u@farrier on Twitter. If you want to tweet me anything @DockerCon as well, share what you're thinking. Great keynote there from Scott CEO. Jenny, demo DockerCon jobs, some highlights there from Scott. Yeah, I love the intro. It's okay I'm about to do the keynote. The little green room comes on, makes it human. We're all trying to survive-- >> Let me answer the reality of what we are all doing with right now. I had to ask my kids to leave though or they would crash the whole stream but yes, we have a great community, a large community gather gathered here today, and we do want to take the opportunity for those that are looking for jobs, are hiring, to share with the hashtag DockerCon jobs. In addition, we want to support direct health care workers, and Bret Fisher and the captains will be running a all day charity stream on the captain's channel. Go there and you'll get the link to donate to directrelief.org which is a California based nonprofit, delivering and aid and supporting health care workers globally response to the COVID-19 crisis. >> Okay, if you jumping into the stream, I'm John Farrie with Jenny Webby, your hosts all day today throughout DockerCon. It's a packed house of great content. You have a main stream, theCUBE which is the mainstream that we'll be promoting a lot of cube interviews. But check out the 40 plus sessions underneath in the interactive calendar on dockercon.com site. Check it out, they're going to be live on a clock. So if you want to participate in real time in the chat, jump into your session on the track of your choice and participate with the folks in there chatting. If you miss it, it's going to go right on demand right after sort of all content will be immediately be available. So make sure you check it out. Docker selfie is a hashtag. Take a selfie, share it. Docker hashtag Docker jobs. If you're looking for a job or have openings, please share with the community and of course give us feedback on what you can do. We got James Governor, the keynote coming up next. He's with Red monk. Not afraid to share his opinion on open source on what companies should be doing, and also the evolution of this Cambrin explosion of apps that are going to be coming as we come out of this post pandemic world. A lot of people are thinking about this, the crisis and following through. So stay with us for more and more coverage. Jenny, favorite sessions on your mind for people to pay attention to that they should (murmurs)? >> I just want to address a few things that continue to come up in the chat sessions, especially breakout sessions after they play live and the speakers in chat with you, those go on demand, they are recorded, you will be able to access them. Also, if the screen is too small, there is the button to expand full screen, and different quality levels for the video that you can choose on your end. All the breakout sessions also have closed captioning, so please if you would like to read along, turn that on so you can, stay with the sessions. We have some great sessions, kicking off right at 10:00 a.m, getting started with Docker. We have a full track really in the how to enhance on that you should check out devs in action, hear what other people are doing and then of course our sponsors are delivering great content to you all day long. >> Tons of content. It's all available. They'll always be up always on at large scale. Thanks for watching. Now we got James Governor, the keynote. He's with Red Monk, the analyst firm and has been tracking open source for many generations. He's been doing amazing work. Watch his great keynote. I'm going to be interviewing him live right after. So stay with us and enjoy the rest of the day. We'll see you back shortly. (upbeat music) >> Hi, I'm James Governor, one of the co-founders of a company called RedMonk. We're an industry research firm focusing on developer led technology adoption. So that's I guess why Docker invited me to DockerCon 2020 to talk about some trends that we're seeing in the world of work and software development. So Monk Chips, that's who I am. I spent a lot of time on Twitter. It's a great research tool. It's a great way to find out what's going on with keep track of, as I say, there's people that we value so highly software developers, engineers and practitioners. So when I started talking to Docker about this event and it was pre Rhona, should we say, the idea of a crowd wasn't a scary thing, but today you see something like this, it makes you feel uncomfortable. This is not a place that I want to be. I'm pretty sure it's a place you don't want to be. And you know, to that end, I think it's interesting quote by Ellen Powell, she says, "Work from home is now just work" And we're going to see more and more of that. Organizations aren't feeling the same way they did about work before. Who all these people? Who is my cLancaern? So GitHub says has 50 million developers right on its network. Now, one of the things I think is most interesting, it's not that it has 50 million developers. Perhaps that's a proxy for number of developers worldwide. But quite frankly, a lot of those accounts, there's all kinds of people there. They're just Selena's. There are data engineers, there are data scientists, there are product managers, there were tech marketers. It's a big, big community and it goes way beyond just software developers itself. Frankly for me, I'd probably be saying there's more like 20 to 25 million developers worldwide, but GitHub knows a lot about the world of code. So what else do they know? One of the things they know is that world of code software and opensource, is becoming increasingly global. I get so excited about this stuff. The idea that there are these different software communities around the planet where we're seeing massive expansions in terms of things like open source. Great example is Nigeria. So Nigeria more than 200 million people, right? The energy there in terms of events, in terms of learning, in terms of teaching, in terms of the desire to code, the desire to launch businesses, desire to be part of a global software community is just so exciting. And you know, these, this sort of energy is not just in Nigeria, it's in other countries in Africa, it's happening in Egypt. It's happening around the world. This energy is something that's super interesting to me. We need to think about that. We've got global that we need to solve. And software is going to be a big part of that. At the moment, we can talk about other countries, but what about frankly the gender gap, the gender issue that, you know, from 1984 onwards, the number of women taking computer science degrees began to, not track but to create in comparison to what men were doing. The tech industry is way too male focused, there are men that are dominant, it's not welcoming, we haven't found ways to have those pathways and frankly to drive inclusion. And the women I know in tech, have to deal with the massively disproportionate amount of stress and things like online networks. But talking about online networks and talking about a better way of living, I was really excited by get up satellite recently, was a fantastic demo by Alison McMillan and she did a demo of a code spaces. So code spaces is Microsoft online ID, new platform that they've built. And online IDs, we're never quite sure, you know, plenty of people still out there just using the max. But, visual studio code has been a big success. And so this idea of moving to one online IDE, it's been around that for awhile. What they did was just make really tight integration. So you're in your GitHub repo and just be able to create a development environment with effectively one click, getting rid of all of the act shaving, making it super easy. And what I loved was it the demo, what Ali's like, yeah cause this is great. One of my kids are having a nap, I can just start (murmurs) and I don't have to sort out all the rest of it. And to me that was amazing. It was like productivity as inclusion. I'm here was a senior director at GitHub. They're doing this amazing work and then making this clear statement about being a parent. And I think that was fantastic. Because that's what, to me, importantly just working from home, which has been so challenging for so many of us, began to open up new possibilities, and frankly exciting possibilities. So Alley's also got a podcast parent-driven development, which I think is super important. Because this is about men and women rule in this together show parenting is a team sport, same as software development. And the idea that we should be thinking about, how to be more productive, is super important to me. So I want to talk a bit about developer culture and how it led to social media. Because you know, your social media, we're in this ad bomb stage now. It's TikTok, it's like exercise, people doing incredible back flips and stuff like that. Doing a bunch of dancing. We've had the world of sharing cat gifts, Facebook, we sort of see social media is I think a phenomenon in its own right. Whereas the me, I think it's interesting because it's its progenitors, where did it come from? So here's (murmurs) So 1971, one of the features in the emergency management information system, that he built, which it's topical, it was for medical tracking medical information as well, medical emergencies, included a bulletin board system. So that it could keep track of what people were doing on a team and make sure that they were collaborating effectively, boom! That was the start of something big, obviously. Another day I think is worth looking at 1983, Sorania Pullman, spanning tree protocol. So at DEC, they were very good at distributed systems. And the idea was that you can have a distributed system and so much of the internet working that we do today was based on radius work. And then it showed that basically, you could span out a huge network so that everyone could collaborate. That is incredibly exciting in terms of the trends, that I'm talking about. So then let's look at 1988, you've got IRC. IRC what developer has not used IRC, right. Well, I guess maybe some of the other ones might not have. But I don't know if we're post IRC yet, but (murmurs) at a finished university, really nailed it with IRC as a platform that people could communicate effectively with. And then we go into like 1991. So we've had IRC, we've had finished universities, doing a lot of really fantastic work about collaboration. And I don't think it was necessarily an accident that this is where the line is twofold, announced Linux. So Linux was a wonderfully packaged, idea in terms of we're going to take this Unix thing. And when I say package, what a package was the idea that we could collaborate on software. So, it may have just been the work of one person, but clearly what made it important, made it interesting, was finding a social networking pattern, for software development so that everybody could work on something at scale. That was really, I think, fundamental and foundational. Now I think it's important, We're going to talk about Linus, to talk about some things that are not good about software culture, not good about open source culture, not good about hacker culture. And that's where I'm going to talk about code of conduct. We have not been welcoming to new people. We got the acronyms, JFTI, We call people news, that's super unhelpful. We've got to find ways to be more welcoming and more self-sustaining in our communities, because otherwise communities will fail. And I'd like to thank everyone that has a code of conduct and has encouraged others to have codes of conduct. We need to have codes of conduct that are enforced to ensure that we have better diversity at our events. And that's what women, underrepresented minorities, all different kinds of people need to be well looked off to and be in safe and inclusive spaces. And that's the online events. But of course it's also for all of our activities offline. So Linus, as I say, I'm not the most charming of characters at all time, but he has done some amazing technology. So we got to like 2005 the creation of GIT. Not necessarily the distributed version control system that would win. But there was some interesting principles there, and they'd come out of the work that he had done in terms of trying to build and sustain the Linux code base. So it was very much based on experience. He had an itch that he needed to scratch and there was a community that was this building, this thing. So what was going to be the option, came up with Git foundational to another huge wave of social change, frankly get to logical awesome. April 20 April, 2008 GitHub, right? GiHub comes up, they've looked at Git, they've packaged it up, they found a way to make it consumable so the teams could use it and really begin to take advantage of the power of that distributed version control model. Now, ironically enough, of course they centralized the service in doing so. So we have a single point of failure on GitHub. But on the other hand, the notion of the poll request, the primitives that they established and made usable by people, that changed everything in terms of software development. I think another one that I'd really like to look at is Slack. So Slack is a huge success used by all different kinds of businesses. But it began specifically as a pivot from a company called Glitch. It was a game company and they still wanted, a tool internally that was better than IRC. So they built out something that later became Slack. So Slack 2014, is established as a company and basically it was this Slack fit software engineering. The focus on automation, the conversational aspects, the asynchronous aspects. It really pulled things together in a way that was interesting to software developers. And I think we've seen this pattern in the world, frankly, of the last few years. Software developers are influences. So Slack first used by the engineering teams, later used by everybody. And arguably you could say the same thing actually happened with Apple. Apple was mainstreamed by developers adopting that platform. Get to 2013, boom again, Solomon Hikes, Docker, right? So Docker was, I mean containers were not new, they were just super hard to use. People found it difficult technology, it was Easter Terek. It wasn't something that they could fully understand. Solomon did an incredible job of understanding how containers could fit into modern developer workflows. So if we think about immutable images, if we think about the ability to have everything required in the package where you are, it really tied into what people were trying to do with CICD, tied into microservices. And certainly the notion of sort of display usability Docker nailed that, and I guess from this conference, at least the rest is history. So I want to talk a little bit about, scratching the itch. And particularly what has become, I call it the developer authentic. So let's go into dark mode now. I've talked about developers laying out these foundations and frameworks that, the mainstream, frankly now my son, he's 14, he (murmurs) at me if I don't have dark mode on in an application. And it's this notion that developers, they have an aesthetic, it does get adopted I mean it's quite often jokey. One of the things we've seen in the really successful platforms like GitHub, Docker, NPM, let's look at GitHub. Let's look at over that Playfulness. I think was really interesting. And that changes the world of work, right? So we've got the world of work which can be buttoned up, which can be somewhat tight. I think both of those companies were really influential, in thinking that software development, which is a profession, it's also something that can and is fun. And I think about how can we make it more fun? How can we develop better applications together? Takes me to, if we think about Docker talking about build, share and run, for me the key word is share, because development has to be a team sport. It needs to be sharing. It needs to be kind and it needs to bring together people to do more effective work. Because that's what it's all about, doing effective work. If you think about zoom, it's a proxy for collaboration in terms of its value. So we've got all of these airlines and frankly, add up that their share that add up their total value. It's currently less than Zoom. So video conferencing has become so much of how we live now on a consumer basis. But certainly from a business to business perspective. I want to talk about how we live now. I want to think about like, what will come out all of this traumatic and it is incredibly traumatic time? I'd like to say I'm very privileged. I can work from home. So thank you to all the frontline workers that are out there that they're not in that position. But overall what I'm really thinking about, there's some things that will come out of this that will benefit us as a culture. Looking at cities like Paris, Milan, London, New York, putting a new cycling infrastructure, so that people can social distance and travel outside because they don't feel comfortable on public transport. I think sort of amazing widening pavements or we can't do that. All these cities have done it literally overnight. This sort of changes is exciting. And what does come off that like, oh there are some positive aspects of the current issues that we face. So I've got a conference or I've got a community that may and some of those, I've been working on. So Katie from HashiCorp and Carla from container solutions basically about, look, what will the world look like in developer relations? Can we have developer relations without the air miles? 'Cause developer advocates, they do too much travel ends up, you know, burning them out, develop relations. People don't like to say no. They may have bosses that say, you know, I was like, Oh that corporates went great. Now we're going to roll it out worldwide to 47 cities. That's stuff is terrible. It's terrible from a personal perspective, it's really terrible from an environmental perspective. We need to travel less. Virtual events are crushing it. Microsoft just at build, right? Normally that'd be just over 10,000 people, they had 245,000 plus registrations. 40,000 of them in the last day, right? Red Hat summit, 80,000 people, IBM think 90,000 people, GitHub Crushed it as well. Like this is a more inclusive way people can dip in. They can be from all around the world. I mentioned Nigeria and how fantastic it is. Very often Nigerian developers and advocates find it hard to get visas. Why should they be shut out of events? Events are going to start to become remote first because frankly, look at it, if you're turning in those kinds of numbers, and Microsoft was already doing great online events, but they absolutely nailed it. They're going to have to ask some serious questions about why everybody should get back on a plane again. So if you're going to do remote, you've got to be intentional about it. It's one thing I've learned some exciting about GitLab. GitLab's culture is amazing. Everything is documented, everything is public, everything is transparent. Think that really clear and if you look at their principles, everything, you can't have implicit collaboration models. Everything needs to be documented and explicit, so that anyone can work anywhere and they can still be part of the team. Remote first is where we're at now, Coinbase, Shopify, even Barkley says the not going to go back to having everybody in offices in the way they used to. This is a fundamental shift. And I think it's got significant implications for all industries, but definitely for software development. Here's the thing, the last 20 years were about distributed computing, microservices, the cloud, we've got pretty good at that. The next 20 years will be about distributed work. We can't have everybody living in San Francisco and London and Berlin. The talent is distributed, the talent is elsewhere. So how are we going to build tools? Who is going to scratch that itch to build tools to make them more effective? Who's building the next generation of apps, you are, thanks.
SUMMARY :
It's the queue with digital coverage Maybe the internet gods be with us today Jenny, Bret, thank you for-- Welcome to the Docker community. but this is special to you guys. of the iceberg and so thrilled to be able or the questions you have. find the session that you want. to help you get the most out of your So the folks who were familiar with that and at the end of this keynote, Awesome and the content attention to the keynotes. and click on the session you want. in the same physical place. And I got to say props to your rig. the sponsor pages and you go, So a lot of the theme here is the impact and interviews in the program today Yeah and the first responders And the nice thing is is Docker of the day we'll see you soon. got to go, thanks bud. of the Docker Community from the Docker command line to the clouds So I'm going to build with Docker compose And so, to allow us to So all the commands that I'm going to run, While the app is deploying to Azure, to get the list with the containers the capability to scan applications Yeah, I love the intro. and Bret Fisher and the captains of apps that are going to be coming in the how to enhance on the rest of the day. in terms of the desire to code,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Ellen Powell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alison McMillan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter McKay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jenny Burcio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jenny | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Italy | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Carla | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Scott Johnson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amanda Silver | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bret | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Egypt | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bret Fisher | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Milan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Paris | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
RedMonk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Farrie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Africa | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Clement Beyondo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Shopify | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jenny Webby | PERSON | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Berlin | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Katie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
December | DATE | 0.99+ |
60% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1983 | DATE | 0.99+ |
1984 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
14 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
GitHub | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nigeria | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2005 | DATE | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Docker | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
DockerCon | EVENT | 0.99+ |
more than 44 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Laura Taco | PERSON | 0.99+ |
40,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
47 cities | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
April 20 April, 2008 | DATE | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wade | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Coinbase | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gagne | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
James Governor | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sorania Pullman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last November | DATE | 0.99+ |
50 million developers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Clemente Biondo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10:00 a.m | DATE | 0.99+ |
Scott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
DockerCon 2020 Kickoff
>>From around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of DockerCon live 2020 brought to you by Docker and its ecosystem partners. >>Hello everyone. Welcome to Docker con 2020 I'm John furrier with the cube. I'm in our Palo Alto studios with our quarantine crew. We have a great lineup here for DockerCon con 2020 virtual event. Normally it was in person face to face. I'll be with you throughout the day from an amazing lineup of content over 50 different sessions, cube tracks, keynotes, and we've got two great co-hosts here with Docker, Jenny Marcio and Brett Fisher. We'll be with you all day, all day today, taking you through the program, helping you navigate the sessions. I'm so excited, Jenny. This is a virtual event. We talk about this. Can you believe it? We're, you know, may the internet gods be with us today and hope everyone's having an easy time getting in. Jenny, Brett, thank you for being here. Hey, >>Yeah. Hi everyone. Uh, so great to see everyone chatting and telling us where they're from. Welcome to the Docker community. We have a great day planned for you >>Guys. Great job. I'm getting this all together. I know how hard it is. These virtual events are hard to pull off. I'm blown away by the community at Docker. The amount of sessions that are coming in the sponsor support has been amazing. Just the overall excitement around the brand and the, and the opportunities given this tough times where we're in. Um, it's super exciting. Again, made the internet gods be with us throughout the day, but there's plenty of content. Uh, Brett's got an amazing all day marathon group of people coming in and chatting. Jenny, this has been an amazing journey and it's a great opportunity. Tell us about the virtual event. Why DockerCon virtual. Obviously everyone's cancelling their events, but this is special to you guys. Talk about Docker con virtual this year. >>Yeah. You know, the Docker community shows up at DockerCon every year and even though we didn't have the opportunity to do an in person event this year, we didn't want to lose the time that we all come together at DockerCon. The conversations, the amazing content and learning opportunities. So we decided back in December to make Docker con a virtual event. And of course when we did that, there was no quarantine. Um, we didn't expect, you know, I certainly didn't expect to be delivering it from my living room, but we were just, I mean we were completely blown away. There's nearly 70,000 people across the globe that have registered for Docker con today. And when you look at backer cons of past right live events, really and more learning are just the tip of the iceberg. And so thrilled to be able to deliver a more inclusive vocal event today. And we have so much planned. Uh, I think Brett, you want to tell us some of the things that you have planned? >>Well, I'm sure I'm going to forget something cause there's a lot going on. But, uh, we've obviously got interviews all day today on this channel with John the crew. Um, Jenny has put together an amazing set of all these speakers all day long in the sessions. And then you have a captain's on deck, which is essentially the YouTube live hangout where we just basically talk shop. Oh, it's all engineers, all day long, captains and special guests. And we're going to be in chat talking to you about answering your questions. Maybe we'll dig into some stuff based on the problems you're having or the questions you have. Maybe there'll be some random demos, but it's basically, uh, not scripted. It's an all day long unscripted event, so I'm sure it's going to be a lot of fun hanging out in there. >>Well guys, I want to just say it's been amazing how you structured this so everyone has a chance to ask questions, whether it's informal laid back in the captain's channel or in the sessions where the speakers will be there with their, with their presentations. But Jenny, I want to get your thoughts because we have a site out there that's structured a certain way for the folks watching. If you're on your desktop, there's a main stage hero. There's then tracks and Brett's running the captain's tracks. You can click on that link and jump into his session all day long. He's got an amazing set of line of sleet, leaning back, having a good time. And then each of the tracks, you can jump into those sessions. It's on a clock. It'll be available on demand. All that content is available if you're on your desktop, if you're on your mobile, it's the same thing. >>Look at the calendar, find the session that you want. If you're interested in it, you could watch it live and chat with the participants in real time or watch it on demand. So there's plenty of content to navigate through. We do have it on a clock and we'll be streaming sessions as they happen. So you're in the moment and that's a great time to chat in real time. But there's more, Jenny, you're getting more out of this event. We, you guys try to bring together the stimulation of community. How does the participants get more out of the the event besides just consuming some of the content all day today? >>Yeah. So first set up your profile, put your picture next to your chat handle and then chat. We have like, uh, John said we have various setups today to help you get the most out of your experience are breakout sessions. The content is prerecorded so you get quality content and the speakers and chat. So you can ask questions the whole time. Um, if you're looking for the hallway track, then definitely check out the captain's on deck channel. Uh, and then we have some great interviews all day on the queue so that up your profile, join the conversation and be kind, right. This is a community event. Code of conduct is linked on every page at the top and just have a great day. >>And Brett, you guys have an amazing lineup on the captain, so you have a great YouTube channel that you have your stream on. So the folks who were familiar with that can get that either on YouTube or on the site. The chat is integrated in, so you're set up, what do you got going on? Give us the highlights. What are you excited about throughout your day? Take us through your program on the captains. That's going to be probably pretty dynamic in the chat too. >>Yeah. Yeah. So, uh, I'm sure we're going to have less, uh, lots of, lots of stuff going on in chat. So no concerns there about, uh, having crickets in the, in the chat. But we're going to, uh, basically starting the day with two of my good Docker captain friends, uh, Nirmal Mehta and Laura taco. And we're going to basically start you out and at the end of this keynote, at the end of this hour, and we're going to get you going. And then you can maybe jump out and go to take some sessions. Maybe there's some cool stuff you want to check out in other sessions that are, you want to chat and talk with the, the instructors, the speakers there, and then you're going to come back to us, right? Or go over, check out the interview. So the idea is you're hopping back and forth and throughout the day we're basically changing out every hour. >>We're not just changing out the, uh, the guests basically, but we're also changing out the topics that we can cover because different guests will have different expertise. We're going to have some special guests in from Microsoft, talk about some of the cool stuff going on there. And basically it's captains all day long. And, uh, you know, if you've been on my YouTube live show you, you've watched that, you've seen a lot of the guests we have on there. I'm lucky to just hang out with all these really awesome people around the world, so it's going to be fun. >>Awesome. And the content again has been preserved. You guys had a great session on call for paper sessions. Jenny, this is good stuff. What are the things can people do to make it interesting? Obviously we're looking for suggestions. Feel free to, to chirp on Twitter about ideas that can be new. But you guys got some surprises. There's some selfies. What else? What's going on? Any secret, uh, surprises throughout the day. >>There are secret surprises throughout the day. You'll need to pay attention to the keynotes. Brett will have giveaways. I know our wonderful sponsors have giveaways planned as well in their sessions. Uh, hopefully right you, you feel conflicted about what you're going to attend. So do know that everything is recorded and will be available on demand afterwards so you can catch anything that you miss. Most of them will be available right after they stream the initial time. >>All right, great stuff. So they've got the Docker selfie. So the Docker selfies, the hashtag is just Docker con hashtag Docker con. If you feel like you want to add some of the hashtag no problem, check out the sessions. You can pop in and out of the captains is kind of the cool, cool. Kids are going to be hanging out with Brett and then all they'll knowledge and learning. Don't miss the keynote. The keynote should be solid. We got changed governor from red monk delivering a keynote. I'll be interviewing him live after his keynote. So stay with us and again, check out the interactive calendar. All you gotta do is look at the calendar and click on the session you want. You'll jump right in. Hop around, give us feedback. We're doing our best. Um, Brett, any final thoughts on what you want to share to the community around, uh, what you got going on the virtual event? Just random thoughts. >>Yeah. Uh, so sorry, we can't all be together in the same physical place. But the coolest thing about as business online is that we actually get to involve everyone. So as long as you have a computer and internet, you can actually attend DockerCon if you've never been to one before. So we're trying to recreate that experience online. Um, like Jenny said, the code of conduct is important. So, you know, we're all in this together with the chat, so try to try to be nice in there. These are all real humans that, uh, have feelings just like me. So let's, let's try to keep it cool and, uh, over in the Catherine's channel be taking your questions and maybe playing some music, playing some games, giving away some free stuff. Um, while you're, you know, in between sessions learning. Oh yeah. >>And I gotta say props to your rig. You've got an amazing setup there, Brett. I love what your show you do. It's really bad ass and kick ass. So great stuff. Jenny sponsors ecosystem response to this event has been phenomenal. The attendance 67,000. We're seeing a surge of people hitting the site now. So, um, if you're not getting in, just, you know, just wait going, we're going to crank through the queue, but the sponsors on the ecosystem really delivered on the content side and also the sport. You want to share a few shout outs on the sponsors who really kind of helped make this happen. >>Yeah, so definitely make sure you check out the sponsor pages and you go, each page is the actual content that they will be delivering. So they are delivering great content to you. Um, so you can learn and a huge thank you to our platinum and gold authors. >>Awesome. Well I got to say, I'm super impressed. I'm looking forward to the Microsoft Amazon sessions, which are going to be good. And there's a couple of great customer sessions there and you know, I tweeted this out last night and let them get you guys' reaction to this because you know, there's been a lot of talk around the covert crisis that we're in, but there's also a positive upshot to this is Cambridge and explosion of developers that are going to be building new apps. And I said, you know, apps apps aren't going to just change the world. They're gonna save the world. So a lot of the theme years, the impact that developers are having right now in the current situation, you know, if we get the goodness of compose and all the things going on in Docker and the relationships, this real impact happening with the developer community. And it's pretty evident in the program and some of the talks and some of the examples how containers and microservices are certainly changing the world and helping save the world. Your thoughts. >>Yeah. So if you, I think we have a, like you said, a number of sessions and interviews in the program today that really dive into that. And even particularly around coven, um, Clemente is sharing his company's experience, uh, from being able to continue operations in Italy when they were completely shut down. Uh, beginning of March, we have also in the cube channel several interviews about from the national Institute of health and precision cancer medicine at the end of the day. And you just can really see how containerization and, uh, developers are moving in industry and, and really humanity forward because of what they're able to build and create, uh, with advances in technology. Yeah. >>And first responders and these days is developers. Brett compose is getting a lot of traction on Twitter. I can see some buzz already building up. There's huge traction with compose, just the ease of use and almost a call for arms for integrating into all the system language libraries. I mean, what's going on with compose? I mean, what's the captain say about this? I mean, it seems to be really tracking in terms of demand and interest. >>Yeah, it's, it's a, I think we're over 700,000 composed files on GitHub. Um, so it's definitely beyond just the standard Docker run commands. It's definitely the next tool that people use to run containers. Um, just by having that we just by, and that's not even counting. I mean, that's just counting the files that are named Docker compose Yammel so I'm sure a lot of you out there have created a gamma file to manage your local containers or even on a server with Docker compose. And the nice thing is, is Docker is doubling down on that. So we've gotten some news recently, um, from them about what they want to do with opening the spec up, getting more companies involved, because compose is already gathered so much interest from the community. You know, AWS has importers, there's Kubernetes importers for it. So there's more stuff coming and we might just see something here in a few minutes. >>Well, let's get into the keynote. Guys, jump into the keynote. If you missed anything, come back to the stream, check out the sessions, check out the calendar. Let's go. Let's have a great time. Have some fun. Thanks for enjoy the rest of the day. We'll see you soon..
SUMMARY :
It's the queue with digital coverage of DockerCon I'll be with you throughout the day from an amazing lineup of content over 50 different We have a great day planned for you Obviously everyone's cancelling their events, but this is special to you guys. have the opportunity to do an in person event this year, we didn't want to lose the And we're going to be in chat talking to you about answering your questions. And then each of the tracks, you can jump into those sessions. Look at the calendar, find the session that you want. So you can ask questions the whole time. So the folks who were familiar with that can get that either on YouTube or on the site. the end of this keynote, at the end of this hour, and we're going to get you going. And, uh, you know, if you've been on my YouTube live show you, you've watched that, you've seen a lot of the What are the things can people do to make it interesting? you can catch anything that you miss. click on the session you want. So as long as you have a computer and internet, And I gotta say props to your rig. Um, so you can learn and a huge thank you in the current situation, you know, if we get the goodness of compose and all the things going on in Docker and the relationships, medicine at the end of the day. just the ease of use and almost a call for arms for integrating into all the system language libraries. I mean, that's just counting the files that are named Docker compose Yammel so I'm sure a lot of you out there have created a gamma file check out the sessions, check out the calendar.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jenny | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Clemente | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brett | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Italy | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brett Fisher | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
December | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jenny Marcio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
DockerCon | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Laura | PERSON | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Docker | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
67,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
each page | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DockerCon con 2020 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Docker con | EVENT | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Nirmal Mehta | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Catherine | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Docker con 2020 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Brett compose | PERSON | 0.97+ |
over 50 different sessions | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
last night | DATE | 0.96+ |
Docker | TITLE | 0.96+ |
over 700,000 composed files | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ | |
nearly 70,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
GitHub | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
DockerCon live 2020 | EVENT | 0.94+ |
Institute of health and precision cancer medicine | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
DockerCon 2020 Kickoff | EVENT | 0.89+ |
John furrier | PERSON | 0.89+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.88+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.87+ |
two great co-hosts | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
first responders | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
this year | DATE | 0.78+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
them | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
national | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
beginning of March | DATE | 0.68+ |
every year | QUANTITY | 0.5+ |
Docker con. | EVENT | 0.49+ |
red monk | PERSON | 0.43+ |
Yammel | PERSON | 0.34+ |
Wendi Whitmore, IBM | IBM Think 2020
>> Narrator: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, it's theCUBE, covering IBM Think, brought to you by IBM. >> Hi everybody. Welcome back to theCUBE's continuous coverage of IBM Think 2020, the digital version of IBM Think. Wendi Whitmore is here. She's the vice president of IBM X-Force Threat Intelligence. Wendy, thanks for coming on. >> Thanks for having me. I'm excited to be here. >> Yeah, you're welcome. With a name like X-Force. That is a killer name. Tell us about X-Force. How are you protecting us? >> Yeah, we get a lot of interesting questions. So, my team is responsible for a pretty wide range of things. They range from incident response. So, when you think of data breaches, typically organizations will call an outside firm, and they'll jump on a plane and respond to threats on-site. Obviously right now, we're jumping on a bit fewer planes, but we still are helping our customers investigate data breaches, and we are on-site when needed. We also have a team of threat intelligence analysts and researchers, who are experts in a wide range of fields from geopolitical issues to cyber-related issues to industry specific. And then we've also got a team that does data breach simulations in a very immersive environment. We've got facilities at Cambridge Massachusetts, as well as within Europe, and now of course, we're bringing all those virtual as well. So, really anything that helps our clients respond more effectively to a data breach is something that we do. >> So, X-Force is traveling right now on empty planes, I presume. >> We are as needed. So, many clients have certainly shifted to where their whole environments are off-site and working remote as well, but we still have clients who are asking us to work on-site, and in those cases we have added a new protective gear to our go-backs, which are usually equipped with hard drives and disc imaging software and passports, and now we have some additional equipment to bring as well. >> And that breach simulation that you talked about. So that's what, like a penetration test, or in similar type of activities? >> Yeah, great question. No, it's actually an immersive environment where we go in, and actually simulate an entire breach for our clients. So, everything from the initial attack, how they would do the data analytics, to things like, how do they respond to the press, and inquiries from the press about the breach, how do they do media training, how they work with their legal counsel. So, it's really a comprehensive immersive environment that simulates kind of the heart pounding that occurs when you actually respond to a data breach. >> Oh, that's awesome, so that mean best practices in communications as well and the PR. I mean, that is obviously, maybe something that's often overlooked, but something that you guys are applying best practice to. >> Wendi: It's such a huge piece of it now, right? Our organizations are not always graded just on the breach itself, but more so on how they respond and how they communicate. The good news is, in that scenario that you can communicate effectively about a breach, and you can have something pretty negative that happens to your organization, but if you respond well, and you communicate really effectively to your clients and to the public, we've seen time and again that those brands actually have no reputational damage, and if anything, their clients trust them even more moving forward. >> We were early on when recording the, just trying to measure the budget impact of COVID-19, but we were early in recording the work from home shift. About 20% of the CIO organizations that we surveyed, actually spending more, or planning to spend more, but many weren't prepared for this work from home. They had to really beef up, and not just adding licenses of video collaboration software, but security for sure, a VPN infrastructure, et cetera. So, can you talk a little bit about how clients have responded, how you've helped them respond to that shif? How has the threat matrix changed? >> Well, so in terms of the attack surface, you mentioned there's a lot more people working from home, right? So, what we've got is over 220 million people in the United States, over one billion people in India alone, that are now working from home. So as you can imagine, that attack surface has really increased from an attacker perspective, right? And coupled with that, is that since March 1st, we've already seen a 6000% increase in coronavirus related spam. So, you've now got this larger attack surface that organizations need to protect against, and you've got an increase in threats and threat activity that is attacking them. So, from that perspective, pretty difficult for CIOs who are used to defending an environment that may be more on-site, and now have this really wide range of attack surface certainly more difficult for them to respond to. The other thing that we've seen, so one of the things that's super critical in these types of situations is to have an incident response plan, and to make sure that you're testing it. So, in our work that we've done both with our incident response teams, as well as with the teams that train clients in how to respond to breaches more effectively, we've seen that 76% of organizations don't actually have a consistently tested or applied incident response plan, and one in four have no plan at all. So, I will say that in terms of how we're working with clients, the first thing that any organization can do right now, is actually, have a plan and test it. So, if you're starting from scratch, it's really as simple as putting words on paper, understanding how you're going to get a hold of your critical team members, having a backup plan in place for communication strategies if your primary infrastructure goes offline. So making sure you know how to get a hold of your personnel. If you're more mature, then what we're really encouraging our clients to do is have a variety of scenarios that they're testing against, and make sure that they're running through those. So, a great one to practice right now, would be a ransomware attack. In particular, how does your organization respond effectively to it? What do you do when you get the initial notification? Do you have critical and sensitive data that's backed up offline, and not always connected to the network? If so, you're going to be in a much better spot to effectively defend against those attacks and limit any of the negative impact to them. >> So, a couple things I want to sort of follow up in. So, what I heard was you've got more fragile work-from-home infrastructure, and you've got somewhat, well, significantly more vulnerable users. I've often said, bad user behavior is going to trump good security infrastructure every time. So, you've got many more opportunities for the bad guys to get in. And so, I'm hearing that threat response is now more critical than ever. It's always been critical. The communication to the board has been hey, chances are we're going to get infiltrated. We got to find it fast, and it's really about response, incident response. We can build modes, we can build layers, but we have to put a plan for that response. And so, it sounds like that's something that maybe is heightened as a result of this COVID-19 crisis. >> Wendi: Oh, it absolutely is. I think it's now more critical than ever. I think there's two approaches, right? So, one of them would be improvising through chaos, which we don't necessarily encourage, right? There's a difference between that and really managing through disruption, and that's what we're encouraging our clients to do, is look at how we can create sustainable processes and procedures. You may have a very well-established team that does response, but perhaps they haven't worked remotely before. So, that means testing those procedures, now taking them to a scenario where everyone is remote. What does that mean? It may mean that you need to capture less data over the network, because perhaps you just don't have the bandwidth or the capacity to do it. We've certainly looked at how we do that. How do we answer questions that are critically needed from an investigative perspective, for example, but without maybe all the resources that we would prefer to have. So, what we're really looking at, is kind of shifting in the way that we manage through these. And then, you mentioned that users who maybe sometimes make bad decisions, right? We're all guilty of that, because especially with that increase in spam, there's also been an increase in Nation-State actors who are now sending out new lures and new attempts to get access to environments that are related to coronavirus. So, we've got cyber criminals, Nation-State actors, everyone, and we're now at home looking to effectively defend. So, some things that organizations can do with that, would be insuring that they have multi-factor authentication on all remotely accessible systems. So, devices, applications, anything that can be accessed remotely should have multi-factor authentication. That will help limit some of the impact. As it relates to spam, organizations should really be making sure they've got good email spam-filtering systems in place, and if they have the capability to send out some test emails to their employees, they should do that, right? We are getting numb. I will say, our CIO and their office does it at least once a week where I know I'm getting a very well-crafted email, and I have to really think twice, and it's really made me think differently about opening my email, and making sure that I'm doing some due diligence, to make sure I know where the email's coming from. One of the things we do, is also any external email is labeled external, so that way if it's a lure that appears to be, it's coming from another employee, but it's actually coming from an external email address, that's another way to help users make some good decisions, and really limit your attack surface, and reduce the threat. >> I think the points you're making here are very important, because if you think about the work-from-home cadence, it's a lot different. You're not nine to five. I mean, who works nine to five anyway, but your hours are different. Oftentimes, you got children to hone. You got dogs barking, kids are crawling all over us on the video. And so, oftentimes, of course we're frenzied at work, but there's a different kind of frenzy, so you might not be as in tune. So, you're basically saying, exercise that a little bit to get people, like a fire drill, to really get them tuned to being sensitized to such phishing attack. >> Right, well if you think about this from the viewpoint of an attacker, all of those scenarios that you mentioned, where you have a global pandemic. So, we're not just talking about a regional threat, like a hurricane or a tornado. In a case of a pandemic, or any of these type of situations, people are more likely to be reading the news, be probably checking social media more often, so that they can get an understanding of the latest news and information that may impact them. If you're an attacker, you've got now this kind of environment of global chaos that's been created, and you can use it to your advantage, because the reality is, as long as there's money to be made, attackers are going to want to take advantage of that scenario. So, what we're really talking about is, as you're reading your work email, as you're checking your personal email, taking a step back, slowing things down amidst all the distractions, barking dogs and co-workers now that may be at your house, also known as children, right? So, we need to really take a step back, and make sure that we are slowing things down, reading and doing due diligence in opening emails that will help all of the CIO and CISO type organizations more effectively to protect their organizations and their clients as well. >> When you talked about ransomware earlier, and I inferred from your comments that best practice, create an air gap, but I'm wondering also, can analytics play a role there, just in terms of identifying anomalous behavior? What else can I do to protect myself from ransomware? >> Great question. So, on the visibility side, which I think is what you're talking about, right? How do we detect these types of attacks? There's lots of great software out there. Typically, what we would want our visibility at the endpoints. So, usually some sort of EDR tool, which is an endpoint detection and response tool. That's going to allow us to capture things. In the old days, we would talk about antivirus software, and now you really have kind of next generation of antivirus software, which also gives you behavioral analytics and actions on the keyboard. We want to be able to detect that in any size environment. So, the more visibility we have into that, the better, but aside from just adopting new technology, potentially, there are best practices steps that we can take, and I mentioned earlier about making sure that you understand what is your most critical and sensitive data, and that you've got it backed up, and a lot of times we go into environments, and they say, "Well yeah, we have backups." This is great, but what they're not realizing, is that oftentimes those backups are connected to the network at all times, and in the case of a ransomware breach, you typically then will see those backups corrupted as well, and organizations will find themselves in a position where they say, "Well, we don't have any valid backups now "that we can restore from, in order to make sure "that we have a safe environment." And so, it's important that organizations understand and do a survey of what is their most critical and sensitive data, and then make sure that's backed up offline, and I say that, because it's not usually viable for organizations to have all of their data backed up offline. That costs a lot of money. That requires a lot of storage, but to look at really prioritizing their environment, their data within it, and making sure that they can have access to that which is needed, and then ultimately that's going to prevent you even needing to have the conversation about ransomware, because you still have access to that data. >> Yeah Wendi, I think you're making some really important points there. The tech obviously, is critical. People shifting to SD-WAN, securing endpoints, securing gateways, but really the processes are very very important, and I'll just throw out an example. If I'm making a snapshot of the Cloud, I'm not backed up. You better make sure that you understand how to recover from that backup, because just that copy is not a backup. You need the proper type of recovery software. You need to test that. Your thoughts on that. >> Yeah, that's absolutely true. So, what we want to make sure is that during the course of a potential ransomware attack, that the email's critical sensitive data is available offline. So, I mentioned earlier that testing is one of the best things that we're recommending. One of the most effective preparations is having an incident response plan, testing it for particular scenarios, and so in this case, one of the other things that we talk about a lot is limiting the impact of a breach. Every organization is going to get attacked, especially in today's day and age where you've got a larger attack surface. The win is really limiting the impact of that attack, and limiting the cost, and having an incident response plan, and having a team of people, whether they're internal or external that are responsible for responding to attacks, is the number one cost management. The number one decrease in cost is having access to that team. Typically, it will save an organization over a million dollars when the average cost of a data breach is about $4 million. So, that's pretty significant, and ultimately, if we can test, as you mentioned, those backups, that they are available in an offline scenario. In the course of one of those IR program plans or tests, that's great. It's a win for the organization. They can ensure that that data is going to be available, and it really helps them exercise that muscle memory in advance of an actual attack. >> Yeah, so the backup corp is actually becomes a really even more important component now. This has been great information. Where can people go specifically as it relates to COVID-19? I want to go look up a checklist to make sure. I've been scrambling to get my homeworkers up and running, get them productive, but boy, I really want to focus now on the things that I should be doing to button up my organization. Where can I go to learn more about this? >> Yeah, so there's so much great information out there, from everyone in the industry, but IBM is clearly no different. So, what we've done is action repurpose at IBM.com homepage where we've got a tremendous amount of information on COVID-19, and then IBM Security.com as well. Our team that focuses on breach response, has in particular, a site called X-Force Exchange, where we're sharing indicators, and we have a particular component that's related to COVID-19 specifically, and then lastly, we've got a free service, which is a threat intelligence enclave that we are hosting with our partner TruSTAR, that is specific to COVID-19 where industry organizations can sign up and then share in real time, threat indicators related to this, and have really that intelligence that's been also qualified by their peers, and many large organizations are using that to defend their environments. So, a lot of great resources out there. >> Wendy, you're an amazing source of knowledge. Thanks so much for coming on the theCUBE, and thanks to the X-Force team, doing some travel when necessary, and helping people really get a handle on this in this crazy crisis time. So, thank you very much. I really appreciate it. >> You're welcome, and certainly stay safe, and thanks for having me on. >> Back at you. All right, and thank you everybody. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE. You're watching our continuous coverage of IBM Think 2020 Digital Think. Be right back right after this short break. (uplifting music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by IBM. of IBM Think 2020, the I'm excited to be here. How are you protecting us? and respond to threats on-site. So, X-Force is traveling right now and in those cases we have that you talked about. that simulates kind of the heart pounding but something that you guys that happens to your organization, organizations that we surveyed, and to make sure that you're testing it. for the bad guys to get in. that are related to coronavirus. to get people, like a fire drill, and make sure that we and in the case of a ransomware breach, You better make sure that you understand is that during the course as it relates to COVID-19? that is specific to COVID-19 and thanks to the X-Force and thanks for having me on. All right, and thank you everybody.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wendi Whitmore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
6000% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Wendi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
March 1st | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
76% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Wendy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
COVID-19 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
about $4 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two approaches | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 220 million people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over one billion people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
nine | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
COVID-19 | TITLE | 0.98+ |
X-Force | TITLE | 0.98+ |
X-Force Exchange | TITLE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
over a million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
About 20% | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
X-Force | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
theCUBE Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Think 2020 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.94+ |
TruSTAR | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Think 2020 Digital Think | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.9+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Threat Intelligence | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.82+ |
once a week | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
at least | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
coronavirus | OTHER | 0.73+ |
Cambridge Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.73+ |
IBM Security.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
IBM Think 2020 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.68+ |
them | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
lot more people | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
global | EVENT | 0.58+ |
Think | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.53+ |
IBM.com | OTHER | 0.39+ |
Rich Gaston, Micro Focus | Virtual Vertica BDC 2020
(upbeat music) >> Announcer: It's theCUBE covering the virtual Vertica Big Data Conference 2020 brought to you by Vertica. >> Welcome back to the Vertica Virtual Big Data Conference, BDC 2020. You know, it was supposed to be a physical event in Boston at the Encore. Vertica pivoted to a digital event, and we're pleased that The Cube could participate because we've participated in every BDC since the inception. Rich Gaston this year is the global solutions architect for security risk and governance at Micro Focus. Rich, thanks for coming on, good to see you. >> Hey, thank you very much for having me. >> So you got a chewy title, man. You got a lot of stuff, a lot of hairy things in there. But maybe you can talk about your role as an architect in those spaces. >> Sure, absolutely. We handle a lot of different requests from the global 2000 type of organization that will try to move various business processes, various application systems, databases, into new realms. Whether they're looking at opening up new business opportunities, whether they're looking at sharing data with partners securely, they might be migrating it to cloud applications, and doing migration into a Hybrid IT architecture. So we will take those large organizations and their existing installed base of technical platforms and data, users, and try to chart a course to the future, using Micro Focus technologies, but also partnering with other third parties out there in the ecosystem. So we have large, solid relationships with the big cloud vendors, with also a lot of the big database spenders. Vertica's our in-house solution for big data and analytics, and we are one of the first integrated data security solutions with Vertica. We've had great success out in the customer base with Vertica as organizations have tried to add another layer of security around their data. So what we will try to emphasize is an enterprise wide data security approach, where you're taking a look at data as it flows throughout the enterprise from its inception, where it's created, where it's ingested, all the way through the utilization of that data. And then to the other uses where we might be doing shared analytics with third parties. How do we do that in a secure way that maintains regulatory compliance, and that also keeps our company safe against data breach. >> A lot has changed since the early days of big data, certainly since the inception of Vertica. You know, it used to be big data, everyone was rushing to figure it out. You had a lot of skunkworks going on, and it was just like, figure out data. And then as organizations began to figure it out, they realized, wow, who's governing this stuff? A lot of shadow IT was going on, and then the CIO was called to sort of reign that back in. As well, you know, with all kinds of whatever, fake news, the hacking of elections, and so forth, the sense of heightened security has gone up dramatically. So I wonder if you can talk about the changes that have occurred in the last several years, and how you guys are responding. >> You know, it's a great question, and it's been an amazing journey because I was walking down the street here in my hometown of San Francisco at Christmastime years ago and I got a call from my bank, and they said, we want to inform you your card has been breached by Target, a hack at Target Corporation and they got your card, and they also got your pin. And so you're going to need to get a new card, we're going to cancel this. Do you need some cash? I said, yeah, it's Christmastime so I need to do some shopping. And so they worked with me to make sure that I could get that cash, and then get the new card and the new pin. And being a professional in the inside of the industry, I really questioned, how did they get the pin? Tell me more about this. And they said, well, we don't know the details, but you know, I'm sure you'll find out. And in fact, we did find out a lot about that breach and what it did to Target. The impact that $250 million immediate impact, CIO gone, CEO gone. This was a big one in the industry, and it really woke a lot of people up to the different types of threats on the data that we're facing with our largest organizations. Not just financial data; medical data, personal data of all kinds. Flash forward to the Cambridge Analytica scandal that occurred where Facebook is handing off data, they're making a partnership agreement --think they can trust, and then that is misused. And who's going to end up paying the cost of that? Well, it's going to be Facebook at a tune of about five billion on that, plus some other finds that'll come along, and other costs that they're facing. So what we've seen over the course of the past several years has been an evolution from data breach making the headlines, and how do my customers come to us and say, help us neutralize the threat of this breach. Help us mitigate this risk, and manage this risk. What do we need to be doing, what are the best practices in the industry? Clearly what we're doing on the perimeter security, the application security and the platform security is not enough. We continue to have breaches, and we are the experts at that answer. The follow on fascinating piece has been the regulators jumping in now. First in Europe, but now we see California enacting a law just this year. They came into a place that is very stringent, and has a lot of deep protections that are really far-reaching around personal data of consumers. Look at jurisdictions like Australia, where fiduciary responsibility now goes to the Board of Directors. That's getting attention. For a regulated entity in Australia, if you're on the Board of Directors, you better have a plan for data security. And if there is a breach, you need to follow protocols, or you personally will be liable. And that is a sea change that we're seeing out in the industry. So we're getting a lot of attention on both, how do we neutralize the risk of breach, but also how can we use software tools to maintain and support our regulatory compliance efforts as we work with, say, the largest money center bank out of New York. I've watched their audit year after year, and it's gotten more and more stringent, more and more specific, tell me more about this aspect of data security, tell me more about encryption, tell me more about money management. The auditors are getting better. And we're supporting our customers in that journey to provide better security for the data, to provide a better operational environment for them to be able to roll new services out with confidence that they're not going to get breached. With that confidence, they're not going to have a regulatory compliance fine or a nightmare in the press. And these are the major drivers that help us with Vertica sell together into large organizations to say, let's add some defense in depth to your data. And that's really a key concept in the security field, this concept of defense in depth. We apply that to the data itself by changing the actual data element of Rich Gaston, I will change that name into Ciphertext, and that then yields a whole bunch of benefits throughout the organization as we deal with the lifecycle of that data. >> Okay, so a couple things I want to mention there. So first of all, totally board level topic, every board of directors should really have cyber and security as part of its agenda, and it does for the reasons that you mentioned. The other is, GDPR got it all started. I guess it was May 2018 that the penalties went into effect, and that just created a whole Domino effect. You mentioned California enacting its own laws, which, you know, in some cases are even more stringent. And you're seeing this all over the world. So I think one of the questions I have is, how do you approach all this variability? It seems to me, you can't just take a narrow approach. You have to have an end to end perspective on governance and risk and security, and the like. So are you able to do that? And if so, how so? >> Absolutely, I think one of the key areas in big data in particular, has been the concern that we have a schema, we have database tables, we have CALMS, and we have data, but we're not exactly sure what's in there. We have application developers that have been given sandbox space in our clusters, and what are they putting in there? So can we discover that data? We have those tools within Micro Focus to discover sensitive data within in your data stores, but we can also protect that data, and then we'll track it. And what we really find is that when you protect, let's say, five billion rows of a customer database, we can now know what is being done with that data on a very fine grain and granular basis, to say that this business process has a justified need to see the data in the clear, we're going to give them that authorization, they can decrypt the data. Secure data, my product, knows about that and tracks that, and can report on that and say at this date and time, Rich Gaston did the following thing to be able to pull data in the clear. And that could be then used to support the regulatory compliance responses and then audit to say, who really has access to this, and what really is that data? Then in GDPR, we're getting down into much more fine grained decisions around who can get access to the data, and who cannot. And organizations are scrambling. One of the funny conversations that I had a couple years ago as GDPR came into place was, it seemed a couple of customers were taking these sort of brute force approach of, we're going to move our analytics and all of our data to Europe, to European data centers because we believe that if we do this in the U.S., we're going to violate their law. But if we do it all in Europe, we'll be okay. And that simply was a short-term way of thinking about it. You really can't be moving your data around the globe to try to satisfy a particular jurisdiction. You have to apply the controls and the policies and put the software layers in place to make sure that anywhere that someone wants to get that data, that we have the ability to look at that transaction and say it is or is not authorized, and that we have a rock solid way of approaching that for audit and for compliance and risk management. And once you do that, then you really open up the organization to go back and use those tools the way they were meant to be used. We can use Vertica for AI, we can use Vertica for machine learning, and for all kinds of really cool use cases that are being done with IOT, with other kinds of cases that we're seeing that require data being managed at scale, but with security. And that's the challenge, I think, in the current era, is how do we do this in an elegant way? How do we do it in a way that's future proof when CCPA comes in? How can I lay this on as another layer of audit responsibility and control around my data so that I can satisfy those regulators as well as the folks over in Europe and Singapore and China and Turkey and Australia. It goes on and on. Each jurisdiction out there is now requiring audit. And like I mentioned, the audits are getting tougher. And if you read the news, the GDPR example I think is classic. They told us in 2016, it's coming. They told us in 2018, it's here. They're telling us in 2020, we're serious about this, and here's the finds, and you better be aware that we're coming to audit you. And when we audit you, we're going to be asking some tough questions. If you can't answer those in a timely manner, then you're going to be facing some serious consequences, and I think that's what's getting attention. >> Yeah, so the whole big data thing started with Hadoop, and Hadoop is open, it's distributed, and it just created a real governance challenge. I want to talk about your solutions in this space. Can you tell us more about Micro Focus voltage? I want to understand what it is, and then get into sort of how it works, and then I really want to understand how it's applied to Vertica. >> Yeah, absolutely, that's a great question. First of all, we were the originators of format preserving encryption, we developed some of the core basic research out of Stanford University that then became the company of Voltage; that build-a-brand name that we apply even though we're part of Micro Focus. So the lineage still goes back to Dr. Benet down at Stanford, one of my buddies there, and he's still at it doing amazing work in cryptography and keeping moving the industry forward, and the science forward of cryptography. It's a very deep science, and we all want to have it peer-reviewed, we all want to be attacked, we all want it to be proved secure, that we're not selling something to a major money center bank that is potentially risky because it's obscure and we're private. So we have an open standard. For six years, we worked with the Department of Commerce to get our standard approved by NIST; The National Institute of Science and Technology. They initially said, well, AES256 is going to be fine. And we said, well, it's fine for certain use cases, but for your database, you don't want to change your schema, you don't want to have this increase in storage costs. What we want is format preserving encryption. And what that does is turns my name, Rich, into a four-letter ciphertext. It can be reversed. The mathematics of that are fascinating, and really deep and amazing. But we really make that very simple for the end customer because we produce APIs. So these application programming interfaces can be accessed by applications in C or Java, C sharp, other languages. But they can also be accessed in Microservice Manor via rest and web service APIs. And that's the core of our technical platform. We have an appliance-based approach, so we take a secure data appliance, we'll put it on Prim, we'll make 50 of them if you're a big company like Verizon and you need to have these co-located around the globe, no problem; we can scale to the largest enterprise needs. But our typical customer will install several appliances and get going with a couple of environments like QA and Prod to be able to start getting encryption going inside their organization. Once the appliances are set up and installed, it takes just a couple of days of work for a typical technical staff to get done. Then you're up and running to be able to plug in the clients. Now what are the clients? Vertica's a huge one. Vertica's one of our most powerful client endpoints because you're able to now take that API, put it inside Vertica, it's all open on the internet. We can go and look at Vertica.com/secure data. You get all of our documentation on it. You understand how to use it very quickly. The APIs are super simple; they require three parameter inputs. It's a really basic approach to being able to protect and access data. And then it gets very deep from there because you have data like credit card numbers. Very different from a street address and we want to take a different approach to that. We have data like birthdate, and we want to be able to do analytics on dates. We have deep approaches on managing analytics on protected data like Date without having to put it in the clear. So we've maintained a lead in the industry in terms of being an innovator of the FF1 standard, what we call FF1 is format preserving encryption. We license that to others in the industry, per our NIST agreement. So we're the owner, we're the operator of it, and others use our technology. And we're the original founders of that, and so we continue to sort of lead the industry by adding additional capabilities on top of FF1 that really differentiate us from our competitors. Then you look at our API presence. We can definitely run as a dup, but we also run in open systems. We run on main frame, we run on mobile. So anywhere in the enterprise or one in the cloud, anywhere you want to be able to put secure data, and be able to access the protect data, we're going to be there and be able to support you there. >> Okay so, let's say I've talked to a lot of customers this week, and let's say I'm running in Eon mode. And I got some workload running in AWS, I've got some on Prim. I'm going to take an appliance or multiple appliances, I'm going to put it on Prim, but that will also secure my cloud workloads as part of a sort of shared responsibility model, for example? Or how does that work? >> No, that's absolutely correct. We're really flexible that we can run on Prim or in the cloud as far as our crypto engine, the key management is really hard stuff. Cryptography is really hard stuff, and we take care of all that, so we've all baked that in, and we can run that for you as a service either in the cloud or on Prim on your small Vms. So really the lightweight footprint for me running my infrastructure. When I look at the organization like you just described, it's a classic example of where we fit because we will be able to protect that data. Let's say you're ingesting it from a third party, or from an operational system, you have a website that collects customer data. Someone has now registered as a new customer, and they're going to do E-commerce with you. We'll take that data, and we'll protect it right at the point of capture. And we can now flow that through the organization and decrypt it at will on any platform that you have that you need us to be able to operate on. So let's say you wanted to pick that customer data from the operational transaction system, let's throw it into Eon, let's throw it into the cloud, let's do analytics there on that data, and we may need some decryption. We can place secure data wherever you want to be able to service that use case. In most cases, what you're doing is a simple, tiny little atomic efetch across a protected tunnel, your typical TLS pipe tunnel. And once that key is then cashed within our client, we maintain all that technology for you. You don't have to know about key management or dashing. We're good at that; that's our job. And then you'll be able to make those API calls to access or protect the data, and apply the authorization authentication controls that you need to be able to service your security requirements. So you might have third parties having access to your Vertica clusters. That is a special need, and we can have that ability to say employees can get X, and the third party can get Y, and that's a really interesting use case we're seeing for shared analytics in the internet now. >> Yeah for sure, so you can set the policy how we want. You know, I have to ask you, in a perfect world, I would encrypt everything. But part of the reason why people don't is because of performance concerns. Can you talk about, and you touched upon it I think recently with your sort of atomic access, but can you talk about, and I know it's Vertica, it's Ferrari, etc, but anything that slows it down, I'm going to be a concern. Are customers concerned about that? What are the performance implications of running encryption on Vertica? >> Great question there as well, and what we see is that we want to be able to apply scale where it's needed. And so if you look at ingest platforms that we find, Vertica is commonly connected up to something like Kafka. Maybe streamsets, maybe NiFi, there are a variety of different technologies that can route that data, pipe that data into Vertica at scale. Secured data is architected to go along with that architecture at the node or at the executor or at the lowest level operator level. And what I mean by that is that we don't have a bottleneck that everything has to go through one process or one box or one channel to be able to operate. We don't put an interceptor in between your data and coming and going. That's not our approach because those approaches are fragile and they're slow. So we typically want to focus on integrating our APIs natively within those pipeline processes that come into Vertica within the Vertica ingestion process itself, you can simply apply our protection when you do the copy command in Vertica. So really basic simple use case that everybody is typically familiar with in Vertica land; be able to copy the data and put it into Vertica, and you simply say protect as part of the data. So my first name is coming in as part of this ingestion. I'll simply put the protect keyword in the Syntax right in SQL; it's nothing other than just an extension SQL. Very very simple, the developer, easy to read, easy to write. And then you're going to provide the parameters that you need to say, oh the name is protected with this kind of a format. To differentiate it between a credit card number and an alphanumeric stream, for example. So once you do that, you then have the ability to decrypt. Now, on decrypt, let's look at a couple different use cases. First within Vertica, we might be doing select statements within Vertica, we might be doing all kinds of jobs within Vertica that just operate at the SQL layer. Again, just insert the word "access" into the Vertica select string and provide us with the data that you want to access, that's our word for decryption, that's our lingo. And we will then, at the Vertica level, harness the power of its CPU, its RAM, its horsepower at the node to be able to operate on that operator, the decryption request, if you will. So that gives us the speed and the ability to scale out. So if you start with two nodes of Vertica, we're going to operate at X number of hundreds of thousands of transactions a second, depending on what you're doing. Long strings are a little bit more intensive in terms of performance, but short strings like social security number are our sweet spot. So we operate very very high speed on that, and you won't notice the overhead with Vertica, perse, at the node level. When you scale Vertica up and you have 50 nodes, and you have large clusters of Vertica resources, then we scale with you. And we're not a bottleneck and at any particular point. Everybody's operating independently, but they're all copies of each other, all doing the same operation. Fetch a key, do the work, go to sleep. >> Yeah, you know, I think this is, a lot of the customers have said to us this week that one of the reasons why they like Vertica is it's very mature, it's been around, it's got a lot of functionality, and of course, you know, look, security, I understand is it's kind of table sticks, but it's also can be a differentiator. You know, big enterprises that you sell to, they're asking for security assessments, SOC 2 reports, penetration testing, and I think I'm hearing, with the partnership here, you're sort of passing those with flying colors. Are you able to make security a differentiator, or is it just sort of everybody's kind of got to have good security? What are your thoughts on that? >> Well, there's good security, and then there's great security. And what I found with one of my money center bank customers here in San Francisco was based here, was the concern around the insider access, when they had a large data store. And the concern that a DBA, a database administrator who has privilege to everything, could potentially exfil data out of the organization, and in one fell swoop, create havoc for them because of the amount of data that was present in that data store, and the sensitivity of that data in the data store. So when you put voltage encryption on top of Vertica, what you're doing now is that you're putting a layer in place that would prevent that kind of a breach. So you're looking at insider threats, you're looking at external threats, you're looking at also being able to pass your audit with flying colors. The audits are getting tougher. And when they say, tell me about your encryption, tell me about your authentication scheme, show me the access control list that says that this person can or cannot get access to something. They're asking tougher questions. That's where secure data can come in and give you that quick answer of it's encrypted at rest. It's encrypted and protected while it's in use, and we can show you exactly who's had access to that data because it's tracked via a different layer, a different appliance. And I would even draw the analogy, many of our customers use a device called a hardware security module, an HSM. Now, these are fairly expensive devices that are invented for military applications and adopted by banks. And now they're really spreading out, and people say, do I need an HSM? Well, with secure data, we certainly protect your crypto very very well. We have very very solid engineering. I'll stand on that any day of the week, but your auditor is going to want to ask a checkbox question. Do you have HSM? Yes or no. Because the auditor understands, it's another layer of protection. And it provides me another tamper evident layer of protection around your key management and your crypto. And we, as professionals in the industry, nod and say, that is worth it. That's an expensive option that you're going to add on, but your auditor's going to want it. If you're in financial services, you're dealing with PCI data, you're going to enjoy the checkbox that says, yes, I have HSMs and not get into some arcane conversation around, well no, but it's good enough. That's kind of the argument then conversation we get into when folks want to say, Vertica has great security, Vertica's fantastic on security. Why would I want secure data as well? It's another layer of protection, and it's defense in depth for you data. When you believe in that, when you take security really seriously, and you're really paranoid, like a person like myself, then you're going to invest in those kinds of solutions that get you best in-class results. >> So I'm hearing a data-centric approach to security. Security experts will tell you, you got to layer it. I often say, we live in a new world. The green used to just build a moat around the queen, but the queen, she's leaving her castle in this world of distributed data. Rich, incredibly knowlegable guest, and really appreciate you being on the front lines and sharing with us your knowledge about this important topic. So thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Hey, thank you very much. >> You're welcome, and thanks for watching everybody. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE, we're covering wall-to-wall coverage of the Virtual Vertica BDC, Big Data Conference. Remotely, digitally, thanks for watching. Keep it right there. We'll be right back right after this short break. (intense music)
SUMMARY :
Vertica Big Data Conference 2020 brought to you by Vertica. and we're pleased that The Cube could participate But maybe you can talk about your role And then to the other uses where we might be doing and how you guys are responding. and they said, we want to inform you your card and it does for the reasons that you mentioned. and put the software layers in place to make sure Yeah, so the whole big data thing started with Hadoop, So the lineage still goes back to Dr. Benet but that will also secure my cloud workloads as part of a and we can run that for you as a service but can you talk about, at the node to be able to operate on that operator, a lot of the customers have said to us this week and we can show you exactly who's had access to that data and really appreciate you being on the front lines of the Virtual Vertica BDC, Big Data Conference.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Target | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vertica | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
May 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
NIST | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Target Corporation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$250 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rich Gaston | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Turkey | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ferrari | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
one box | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
C | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Stanford University | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Java | TITLE | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
this week | DATE | 0.99+ |
National Institute of Science and Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Each jurisdiction | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vertica | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Rich | PERSON | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
Vertica Virtual Big Data Conference | EVENT | 0.98+ |
one channel | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one process | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.98+ |
SQL | TITLE | 0.98+ |
five billion rows | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about five billion | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
C sharp | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Benet | PERSON | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
four-letter | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Vertica Big Data Conference 2020 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
Hadoop | TITLE | 0.94+ |
Kafka | TITLE | 0.94+ |
Micro Focus | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
UNLIST TILL 4/1 - Putting Complex Data Types to Work
hello everybody thank you for joining us today from the virtual verdict of BBC 2020 today's breakout session is entitled putting complex data types to work I'm Jeff Healey I lead vertical marketing I'll be a host for this breakout session joining me is Deepak Magette II technical lead from verdict engineering but before we begin I encourage you to submit questions and comments during the virtual session you don't have to wait just type your question or comment and the question box below the slides and click Submit it won't be a Q&A session at the end of the presentation we'll answer as many questions were able to during that time any questions we don't address we'll do our best to answer them offline alternatively visit Vertica forms that formed up Vertica calm to post your questions there after the session engineering team is planning to join the forms conversation going and also as a reminder that you can maximize your screen by clicking a double arrow button in the lower right corner of the slides yes this virtual session is being recorded and will be available to view on demand this week we'll send you a notification as submits ready now let's get started over to you Deepak thanks yes make sure you talk about the complex a textbook they've been doing it wedeck R&D without further delay let's see why and how we should put completely aside to work in your data analytics so this is going to be the outline or overview of my talk today first I'm going to talk about what are complex data types in some use cases I will then quickly cover some file formats that support these complex website I will then deep dive into the current support for complex data types in America finally I'll conclude with some usage considerations and what is coming in are 1000 release and our future roadmap and directions for this project so what are complex stereotypes complex data types are nested data structures composed of tentative types community types are nothing but your int float and string war binary etc the basic types some examples of complex data types include struct also called row are a list set map and Union composite types can also be built by composing other complicated types computer types are very useful for handling sparse data we also make samples on this presentation on that use case and also they help simplify analysis so let's look at some examples of complex data types so the first example on the left you can see a simple customer which is of type struc with two fields namely make a field name of type string and field ID of type integer structs are nothing but a group of fields and each field is a type of its own the type can be primitive or another complex type and on the right we have some example data for this simple customer complex type so it's basically two fields of type string and integer so in this case you have two rows where the first row is Alex with name named Alex and ID 1 0 and the second row has name Mary with ID 2 0 0 2 the second complex type on the left is phone numbers of type array of data has the element type string so area is nothing but a collection of elements the elements could be again a primitive type or another complex type so in this example the collection is of type string which is a primitive type and on the right you have some example of this collection of a fairy type called phone numbers and basically each row has a set or the list or a collection of phone numbers on the first we have two phone numbers and second you have a single phone number in that array and the third type on the slide is the map data type map is nothing but a collection of key value pairs so each element is actually a key value and you have a collection of such elements the key is usually a primitive type however the value is can be a primitive or complex type so in this example the both the key and value are of type string and then if you look on the right side of the slide you have some sample data here we have HTTP requests where the key is the header type and the value is the header value so the for instance on the first row we have a key type pragma with value no cash key type host with value some hostname and similarly on the second row you have some key value called accept with some text HTML because yeah they actually have a collection of elements allison maps are commonly called as collections as a to talking to in mini documents so we saw examples of a one-level complex steps on this slide we have nested complex there types on the right we have the root complex site called web events of type struct script has a for field a session ID of type integer session duration of type timestamp and then the third and the fourth fields customer and history requests are further complex types themselves so customer is again a complex type of type struct with three fields where the first two fields name ID are primitive types however the third field is another complex type phone numbers which we just saw in the previous slide similarly history request is also the same map type that we just saw so in this example each complex types is independent and you can reuse a complex type inside other complex types for example you can build another type called orders and simply reuse the customer type however in a practical implementation you have to deal with complexities involving security ownership and like sets lifecycle dependencies so keeping complex types as independent has that advantage of reusing them however the complication with that is you have to deal with security and ownership and lifecycle dependencies so this is on this slide we have another style of declaring a nested complex type do is call inlined complex data type so we have the same web driven struct type however if you look at the complex sites that embedded into the parent type definition so customer and HTTP request definition is embedded in lined into this parent structure so the advantage of this is you won't have to deal with the security and other lifecycle dependency issues but with the downside being you can't reuse them so it's sort of a trade-off between the these two so so let's see now some use cases of these complex types so the first use case or the benefit of using complex stereotypes is that you'll be able to express analysis mode naturally compute I've simplified the expression of analysis logic thereby simplifying the data pipelines in sequel it feels as if you have tables inside table so let's look at an example on and say you want to list all the customers with more than one thousand website events so if you have complex types you can simply create a table called web events and with one column of type web even which is a complex step so we just saw that difference it has four fields station customer and HTTP request so you can basically have the entire schema or in one type if you don't have complex types you'll have to create four tables one essentially for each complex type and then you have to establish primary key foreign key dependencies across these tables now if you want to achieve your goal of of listing all the customers in more than thousand web requests if you have complex types you can simply use the dot notation to extract the name the contact and also use some special functions for maps that will give you the count of all the HTTP requests grid in thousand however if you don't have complex types you'll have to now join each table individually extract the results from sub query and again joined on the outer query and finally you can apply a predicate of total requests which are greater than thousand to basically get your final result so it's a complex steps basically simplify the query writing part also the execution itself is also simplified so you don't have to have joins if you have complex you can simply have a load step to load the map type and then you can apply the function on top of it directly however if you have separate tables you have to join all these data and apply the filter step and then finally another joint to get your results alright so the other advantage of complex types is that you can cross this semi structured data very efficiently for example if you have data from clique streams or page views the data is often sparse and maps are very well suited for such data so maps or semi-structured by nature and with this support you can now actually have semi structured data represented along with structured columns in in any database so maps have this nice of nice feature to cap encapsulated sparse data as an example the common fields of a kick stream click stream or page view data are pragma host and except if you don't have map types you will have to end up creating a column for each of this header or field types however if you have map you can basically embed as key value pairs for all the data so on the left here on the slide you can see an example where you have a separate column for each field you end up with a lot of nodes basically the sparse however if you can embed them into in a map you can put them into a single column and sort of yeah have better efficiency and better representation of spots they imagine if you have thousands of fields in a click stream or page view you will have thousands of columns you will need thousands of columns represent data if you don't have a map type correct so given these are the most commonly used complexity types let's see what are the file formats that actually support these complex data types so most of file formats popular ones support complex data types however they have different serve variations so for instance if you have JSON it supports arrays and objects which are complex data types however JSON data is schema-less it is row oriented and this text fits because it is Kimmel s it has to store it in encase on every job the second type of file format is Avro and Avro has records enums arrays Maps unions and a fixed type however Avro has a schema it is oriented and it is binary compressed the third category is basically the park' and our style of file formats where the columnar so parquet and arc have support for arrays maps and structs the hewa schema they are column-oriented unlike Avro which is oriented and they're also binary compressed and they support a very nice compression and encoding types additionally so the main difference between parquet and arc is only in terms of how they represent complex types parquet includes the complex type hierarchy as reputation deflation levels however orc uses a separate column at every parent of the complex type to basically the prisons are now less so that apart from that difference in how they represent complex types parking hogs have similar capabilities in terms of optimizations and other compression techniques so to summarize JSON has no schema has no binary format in this columnar so it is not columnar Avro has a schema because binary format however it is not columnar and parquet and art are have a schema have a binary format and are columnar so let's see how we can query these different kinds of complex types and also the different file formats that they can be present in in how we can basically query these different variations in Vertica so in Vertica we basically have this feature called flex tables to where you can load complex data types and analyze them so flex tables use a binary format called vemma to store data as key value pairs clicks tables are schema-less they are weak typed and they trade flexibility for performance so when I mean what I mean by schema-less is basically the keys provide the field name and each row can potentially have different keys and it is weak type because there's no type information at the column level we have some we will see some examples of of this week type in the following slides but basically there's no type information so so the data is stored in text format and because of the week type and schema-less nature of flex tables you can implement some optimum use cases like if you can trivially implement needs like schema evolution or keep the complex types types fluid if that is your use case then the weak tightness and schema-less nature of flex tables will help you a lot to get give you that flexibility however because you have this weak type you you have a downside of not getting the best possible performance so if you if your use case is to get the best possible performance you can use a new feature of the strongly-typed complex types that we started to introduce in Vertica so complex types here are basically a strongly typed complex types they have a schema and then they give you the best possible performance because the optimizer now has enough information from the schema and the type to implement optimization system column selection or all the nice techniques that Vertica employs to give you the best possible color performance can now be supported even for complex types so and we'll see some of the examples of these two types in these slides now so let's use a simple data called restaurants a restaurant data - as running throughout this poll excites to basically see all the different variations of flex and complex steps so on this slide you have some sample data with four fields and essentially two rows if you sort of loaded in if you just operate them out so the four fields are named cuisine locations in menu name in cuisine or of type watch are locations is essentially an array and menu array of a row of two fields item and price so if you the data is in JSON there is no schema and there is no type information so how do we process that in Vertica so in Vertica you can simply create a flex table called restaurants you can copy the restaurant dot J's the restaurants of JSON file into Vertica and basically you can now start analyzing the data so if you do a select star from restaurants you will see that all the data is actually in one column called draw and it also you have the other column called identity which is to give you some unique row row ID but the row column base again encapsulates all the data that gives in the restaurant so JSON file this tall column is nothing but the V map format the V map format is a binary format that encodes the data as key value pairs and RAW format is basically backed by the long word binary column type in Vertica so each key essentially gives you the field name and the values the field value and it's all in its however the values are in the text text representation so see now you want to get better performance of this JSON data flex tables has these nice functions to basically analyze your data or try to extract some schema and type information from your data so if you execute compute flex table keys on the restaurants table you will see a new table called public dot restaurants underscore keys and then that will give you some information about your JSON data so it was able to automatically infer that your data has four fields namely could be name cuisine locations in menu and could also get that the name in cuisine or watch are however since locations in menu are complex types themselves one is array and one is area for row it sort of uses the same be map format as ease to process them so it has four columns to two primitive of type watch R and 2 R P map themselves so now you can materialize these columns by altering the table definitions and adding columns of that particular type it inferred and then you can get better performance from this materialized columns and yeah it's basically it's not in a single column anymore you have four columns for the fare your restaurant data and you can get some column selection and other optimizations on on the data that Whittaker provides all right so that is three flex tables are basically helpful if you don't have a schema and if you don't have any type of permission however we saw earlier that some file formats like Parker and Avro have schema and have some type information so in those cases you don't have to do the first step of inputting the type so you can directly create the type external table definition of the type and then you can target it to the park a file and you can load it in by an external table in vertical so the same restaurants dot JSON if you call if you transfer it to a translations or park' format you can basically get the fields with look however the locations and menu are still in the B map format all right so the V map format also allows you to explode the data and it has some nice functions to yeah M extract the fields from P map format so you have this map items so the same restaurant later if you want to explode and you want to apply predicate on the fields of the RS and the address of pro you can have map items to export your data and then you can apply predicates on a particular field in the complex type data so on this slide is basically showing you how you can explode the entire data the menu items as well as the locations and basically give you the elements of each of these complex types up so as I mentioned the menus so if you go back to the previous slide the locations and menu items are still the bond binary or the V map format so the question is if you want what if you want to get perform better on the V map data so for primitive types you could materialize into the primitive style however if it's an array and array of row we will need some first-class complex type constructs and that is what we will see that are added in what is right now so Vertica has started to introduce complex stereotypes with where these complex types is sort of a strongly typed complex site so on this slide you have an example of a row complex type where so we create an external table called customers and you have a row type of twit to fields name and ID so the complex type is basically inlined into the tables into the column definition and on the second example you can see the create external table items which is unlisted row type so it has an item of type row which is so fast to peals name and the properties is again another nested row type with two fixed quantities label so these are basically strongly typed complex types and then the optimizer can now give you a better performance compared to the V map using the strongly typed information in their queries so we have support for pure rows and extra draws in external tables for power K we have support for arrays and nested arrays as well for external tables in power K so you can declare an external table called contacts with a flip phone number of array of integers similarly you can have a nested array of items of type integer we can declare a column with that strongly typed complex type so the other complex type support that we are adding in the thinner liz's support for optimized one dimensional arrays and sets for both ross and as well as RK external table so you can create internal table called phone numbers with a one-dimensional array so here you have phone numbers of array of type int you can have one dimensional you can have sets as well which is also one color one dimension arrays but sets are basically optimized for fast look ups they are have unique elements and they are ordered so big so you can get fast look ups using sets if that is a use case then set will give you very quick lookups for elements and we also implemented some functions to support arrays sets as well so you have applied min apply max which are scale out that you can apply on top of an array element and you can get the minimum element and so on so you can up you have support for additional functions as well so the other feature that is coming in ten o is the explored arrays of functionality so we have a implemented EU DX that will allow you to similar similar to the example you saw in the math items case you can extract elements from these arrays and you can apply different predicates or analysis on the elements so for example if you have this restaurant table with the column name watch our locations of each an area of archer and menu again an area watch our you can insert values using the array constructor into these columns so here we inserting three values lilies feed the with location with locations cambridge pittsburgh menu items cheese and pepperoni again another row with name restaurant named bob tacos location Houston and totila salsa and Patty on the third example so now you can basically explode the both arrays into and extract the elements out from these arrays so you can explode the location array and extract the location elements which is which are basically Houston Cambridge Pittsburgh New Jersey and also you can explode the menu items and extract individual elements and now you can sort of apply other predicates on the extruded data Kollek so so so let's see what are some usage considerations of these complex data types so complex data types as we saw earlier are nice if you have sparse data so if your data has clickstream or has some page view data then maps are very nice to have to represent your data and then you can sort of efficiently represent the in the space wise fashion for sparse data use a map types and compensate that as we saw earlier for the web request count query it will help you simplify the analysis as well you don't have to have joins and it will simplify your query analysis as I just mentioned if your use cases are for fast look ups then you can use a set type so arrays are nice but they have the ordering on them however if your primary use case to just look up for certain elements then we can use the set type also you can use the B map or the Flex functionality that we have in Vertica if you want flexibility in your complex set data type schema so like I mentioned earlier you can trivially implement needs like scheme evolution or even keep the complex types fluid so if you have multiple iterations of unit analysis and each iteration we are changing the fields because you're just exploring the data then we map and flex will give you that nice ease to change the fields within the complex type or across files and we can load fluid complex you can load complexity types with bit fluids is basically different fields in different Rho into V map and flex tables easily however if you're once you basically treated over your data you figured out what are the fields and the complex types that you really need you can use the strongly typed complex data types that we started to introduce in Vertica so you can use the array type the struct type in the map type for your data analysis so that's sort of the high level use cases for complex types in vertical so it depends on a lot on where your data analysis phase is fear early then your data is usually still fluid and you might want to use V Maps and flex to explore it once you finalize your schema you can use the strongly typed complex data types and to get the best possible performance holic so so what's coming in the following releases of Vertica so antenna which is coming in sometime now so yeah so we are adding which is the next release of vertical basically we're adding support for loading Park a complex data types to the V map format so parquet is a strongly typed file format basically it has the schema it also has the type information for each of the complex type however if you are exploring your data then you might have different park' files with different schemes so you can load them to the V map format first and then you can analyze your data and then you can switch to the strongly typed complex types we're also adding one dimensional optimized arrays and sets in growth and for parquet so yeah the complex sets are not just limited to parquet you can also store them in drawers however right now you only support one dimension arrays and set in rows we're also adding the Explorer du/dx for one-dimensional arrays in the in this release so you can as you saw in the previous example you can explode the data for of arrays in arrays and you can apply predicates on individual elements for the erase data so you can in it'll apply for set so you can cause them to milli to erase and Clinics code sets as well so what are the plans paths that you know release so we are going to continue both for strongly-typed computer types right now we don't have support for the full in the tail release we won't have support for the full all the combinations of complex types so we only have support for nested arrays sorriness listed pure arrays or nested pure rows and some are only limited to park a file format so we will continue to add more support for sub queries and nested complex sites in the following in the in following releases and we're also planning to add this B map data type so you saw in the examples that the V map data format is currently backed by the long word binary data format or the other column type because of this the optimizer really cannot distinguish which is a which is which data is actually a long wall binary or which is actually data and we map format so if we the idea is to basically add a type called V map and then the optimizer can now implement our support optimizations or even syntax such as dot notation and yeah if your data is columnar such as Parque then you can implement optimizations just keep push down where you can push the keys that are actually querying in your in your in your analysis and then only those keys should be loaded from parquet and built into the V map format so that way you get sort of the column selection optimization for complex types as well and yeah that's something you can achieve if you have different types for the V map format so that's something on the roadmap as well and then unless join is basically another nice to have feature right now if you want to explode and join the array elements you have to explode in the sub query and then in the outer query you have to join the data however if you have unless join till I love you to explode as well as join the data in the same query and on the fly you can do both and finally we are also adding support for this new feature called UD vector so that's on the plan too so our work for complex types is is essentially chain the fundamental way Vertica execute in the sense of functions and expression so right now all expressions in Vertica can return only a single column out acceptance in some cases like beauty transforms and so on but the scalar functions for instance if you take aut scalar you can get only one column out of it however if you have some use cases where you want to compute multiple computation so if you also have multiple computations on the same input data say you have input data of two integers and you want to compute both addition and multiplication on those two columns this is for example but in many many machine learning example use cases have similar patterns so say you want to do both these computations on the data at the same time then in the current approach you have to have one function for addition one function for multiplication and both of them will have to load the data once basically loading data twice to get both these computations turn however with the Uni vector support you can perform both these computations in the same function and you can return two columns out so essentially saving you the loading loading these columns twice you can only do it once and get both the results out so that's sort of what we are trying to implement with all the changes that we are doing to support complex data types in Vertica and also you don't have to use these over Clause like a uni transform so PD scale just like we do scalars you can have your a vector and you can have multiple columns returned from your computations so that sort of concludes my talk so thank you for listening to my presentation now we are ready for Q&A
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Healey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second row | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two rows | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two fields | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first row | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two rows | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two types | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each row | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two integers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Deepak | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one function | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three fields | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fourth fields | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each element | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each field | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than thousand web requests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second example | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
each key | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each table | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four fields | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third field | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first example | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Deepak Magette II | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two columns | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third category | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two columns | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two fields | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Houston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thousands of columns | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three values | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
more than one thousand website events | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
third type | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each iteration | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
greater than thousand | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
cambridge | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
JSON | TITLE | 0.98+ |
both arrays | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one column | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
thousands of fields | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
third example | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
single column | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
thousand | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Alex | PERSON | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
BBC 2020 | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Vertica | TITLE | 0.96+ |
four columns | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one type | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
V Maps | TITLE | 0.94+ |
one color | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
second type | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one dimension | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first two fields | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
four tables | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Darren Murph, GitLab | GitLab Commit 2020
>>from San Francisco. It's the Cube covering. Get lab commit 2020 Brought to you by get lab. >>I am stupid, man, and this is the Cubes coverage of Get Lab. Commit 2020 here in San Francisco. Still hard saying 2020 and not thinking we're in the future. Joining us first time on the program. Darren Murph, who's the head of remote at get lab and a little birdie, told me that he also has a Guinness Book of World record. So, >>Darren, before we get >>into your day job, bring us back, is it? It's, uh, it's an interesting thing. >>Yeah, it's true. Surreal to have their records. So I'm the world's most prolific professional blogger, which is kind of crazy of Britain. About 10 million words or so When the record was given, it was about 17,000 articles, which was an article published every two hours, 24 7 for four straight years, which actually makes my chest hurt just a bit saying that out loud. >>But Darrin, I'm going thio going to do the Turing test right now >>because I'm not sure you're human being. I have been a blogger. When I had my regular cadence of 2 to 3 articles a week and knew the you know, 10 p.m. When the kids were in bed when I would do that stuff. The amount of words you're saying, um, you know that does not compute with me, but amazing stuff. Congratulations on. And you still you don't keep up that pace >>anymore. Try actually, part of >>my job here, get Lab is to make the all remote section of our handbook a lot bigger and better than it. ISS. So I'm still cranking away very different capacity than covering consumer electronics, but still cranking. Yeah, all right. >>Remote? Yes. Really interesting topic. When we talk about the future of work, you talk about the gig economy. There's all these ways that, you know, how do we leverage and enable global and changing workforce? And it's really fascinating. Get lab over 1100 employees and completely remote keynote this morning talked about, you know, the woman in New Zealand that's completely cut off with everything except for the Internet. She does her own power and everything like that, but she could just be part of the team and you don't even know. So tell us a little bit. What does that mean? Head of remote for your >>old. So as we've grown, it's It's interesting. There's an intersection of hiring and recruiting, talent branding, but also process. So we have a lot of people joining the company that come from co located spaces. And there's a certain acclamation period to getting used to remote and doing remote. Well, you think about people that have joined a co located company. They walk into an office where they've had a professional design, their office space. So they have ergonomic chairs, ergonomic monitors. Everything is set up for them. But if you're working from home or working for some wires from somewhere outside of an office, now that's on. You did. How do you do meetings? Well, how do you do? A synchronous Well, so part of my role is to work through those processes to make sure everyone, when they're on board and get lab, is giving the best possible experience. If they're coming into a remote role for the first time, >>you do you have any bias towards it makes sense to just build it in my home. Is it good to go to Oh, You know, I live in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and there's this cool place where I can go where they have good coffee and the people I can hang out with everything in between. What are some of the best >>practices there? The beauty of all remote is we don't say you have to work from home. You can work from anywhere. So wherever you're most comfortable, maybe that's a co working space. Maybe that's at a friend's house. Maybe that's a different place. Every month we have people that travel all around the world and every month or in a different time zone. That's the beauty of it. So we have over 1100 employees, but none of them operate their days quite the same as anyone else, and that that's the beauty of a super diverse and inclusive team. And, well, actually reimburse co working space expensing expenses. If you just feel more comfortable working in a group or you need to leave your home for any reason. Okay, >>um, we talked to sit a little bit about, you know, does this remote work for every type of job? His feedback from the light Combinator people were like, If you're in finance, It might not be the best fit on dhe one. Understand? How does the software help does it if if I'm someone that's doing development, you know, doesn't poke me every once in a while and say, Hey, you know, maybe you should eat and sleep every once in a while And you know, you've been going at this a little long time, you know? How does both the kind of the kind of HR and the technology piece fit together? >>Well, we hire people that are managers of one, so having a high degree of autonomy is really important. So you need to have a lot of self awareness in managing your day, and that includes taking breaks. And so we encourage people to take vacation, take breaks whenever they need it, and again everyone is different. So we enable people to take that as they need that. But no doubt when you're hiring, you want to look for things like that. It helps to have some experience in the working world, definitely with interns in junior level level level people, you need to check in with them more often because managing their own time and themselves when you're not in an office setting can feel a bit far, but actually get lab. The product is tailor made for remote teams because it's built by remote and even on the marketing side of things where no code really is involved. We use it to manage entire projects and entire events. And the beauty of that is it hones in on documentation, which is essential to do remote. Well, so we say any part of a project that you're moving forward try to move that forward and add context in a way that someone else who may be asleep right now when they wake up and read your stuff along the way they have context of what you did and can pick it up from there and move it on to the next step so that that helps us work really well, remotely. But honestly, that is probably useful for co located teams as well. And so a lot of people look at us as all you know, you have this all remote team. Things must be drastically different, but the truth is, all remote forces you to do things that you should be doing anyway. Transparency, documentation iteration. We just have to do them much more quickly and much more intentionally. >>Yeah, when everybody gets together event like this, Are they okay being on the same room, or do they want to go documents and things and hand things off? >>The funny thing about that is people will often say I don't know if I could I could work well in a remote environment because I really love the energy of being with other people. And the truth is in person, interactions are vital to a remote company. We have to be really intentional about that as well. So we get a CZ many people, as we can together for things like get lab, commit and get lab, contribute where we invite the entire company. But the subtle differences when you're in a co located space and you see people on a daily basis, sometimes you can take for granted in person interactions you have because you think I'll just see them again and again and again, but never in a remote setting. When you have to be intentional about when you'll see a person, it's it's there's a certain level of energy and, um, you proactively look forward to moments like that because you don't get them is often. So we build a lot of great bonds and relationships around those key in person moments. >>Is there anything along the communication technologies that you recommend you use video conference thing or, you know, phone calls? Or you know what some of the recommended How do I make sure you get, you know, some high bandwith interacting? >>There's a few tools that we use that didn't exist not too long ago, but because they exist now they've made all remote as a concept far more approachable and feasible. Google Docks is a big one. We cover agendas and things like that and something that could be edited by multiple people at once. Zuma's another one. Zoom is really amazing for video communication because many, many dozens of people hundreds of people, could be on the same call. And with very little technical difficulty, everyone can communicate well, which has been amazing for us being able to see each other on connect on a meaningful in a meaningful way, and the last one is actually get lab the product. So we build our handbooks. We have over 3000 pages of publicly accessible Get Live Handbook, How We Do Everything that is All publicly available on the Web and built and edited by Get Lab the product. So as we use get lab product to edit and iterated on their handbook, we as a get lab team see things that could be done better, more efficiently, and that gives us a flywheel of making the product better and then making the handbook better. So, >>Darren, I'm just curious where there any kind of interesting findings that you've had, uh, going to a company this size now with everything remote that you know, surprises >>the team. Well, I've worked remotely my entire career in different stages of remote. So some of the companies have been about 50 50 and some have been most of the people in the office. And then I've been one of maybe 10% of the company that works. Outside of it, you see all different facets of how people and companies communicate when you're in a hybrid remote setting. But the beautiful thing about all remote is it truly makes everyone a first class citizen. So a lot of people will say in a hybrid setting. If I don't go to the office frequently enough, miss out on some things. Or maybe I miss out on praise or promotion opportunities. Things like that. You feel like a second class citizen. So in, in in, in an environment like that, you have to take certain approaches to include people. You have to think about it intentionally to include those remote individuals, whereas if it's all remote, you're all on a level playing field. I think the other interesting thing is we have an amazingly diverse team over 65 countries because we hire the world's best talent from wherever they are. And so you'll be talking with someone on a call and you'll just see what's in their background. You think that looks completely foreign to where I am, and it's an amazing way to engage with someone and learn about them, learn about a new culture and truly keep a more global perspective. And lastly, all remote enables a workforce that may have been rejected at other stages of the workforce. So things like caregivers or working parents or military spouses where their spouse has to move at each new deployment. Ah, lot of these people might say, You know, it's too complicated to continue to reinvent my career with every move along the way in an all remote setting. Your job goes with you as those changes in life happened. And I just think that's going to become more than Norm, where the notion of moving for a career will seem silly, like the career should just follow you, no matter where life takes you. >>Yeah, I guess that lets follow upon that is we've reached a point where people expect, you know, immediate response. It's a text. It's something like that. When I'm dealing with dispersed and remote, how do you make How do you is that something you deal with? Is it something that is a team monitoring and handling that? But how do I make sure that I'm a little? I would I think, that it has to be a little bit more forgiving of not being an instant response. >>I tell you, all remote is actually much better for your mental health insanity than other settings, and it's because it forces us to work a synchronously. There's no other way to do it. We have people spread or call 65 countries, so almost every time zone is covered. But that also means there's almost a guarantee that someone on your team isn't a vastly different times, so they may be asleep the entire time. Europe working. We also allow people to just structure their day day today differently, depending on what they have going on appointments, things they need to attend to with their Children, things like that. So within a single as mindset, it enables all of us to take a step back and just assume that whatever we're doing is done with no one else online, so it can removes the burden of this nonstop string of slag messages where you have to respond to things immediately within a given time frame. We don't operate in that construct. I'll tell you, just from a mental health standpoint, when you have an entire company that embraces that were all given a little more breathing room to do really good. Deep work requires long periods of uninterrupted time, and we've seen massive improvements on the product and just team morale. When we embrace that and I feel like as a whole as a society, we're getting close to a tipping point where people are just to their limit on how many more slack messages or e mails or pings or urgent, urgent, urgent things they could do while also doing their job well. So we may be a little bit ahead of the curve on that. But my hope is that the industry at large embraces that allows the people more time to actually do the work they were hired. >>Darren Murph love the idea. Hope it definitely spreads beyond. Everybody absolutely can use the breathing room and being able to focus because we we know that multitasking really is a myth when it comes down to it. So great to be able to chat with you in person and thank you for all the >>work you're doing. A remote. Thanks for having me here. I appreciate it. All right, check out the cube dot net for all of our coverage, whether you were at an event or watching remote or after it, >>we've got all the content for you to meet him in. Thank you for watching the Cube
SUMMARY :
Get lab commit 2020 Brought to you by get lab. I am stupid, man, and this is the Cubes coverage of Get Lab. into your day job, bring us back, is it? So I'm the world's most prolific professional blogger, And you still you don't keep up that pace my job here, get Lab is to make the all remote section of our handbook a lot bigger and better than it. She does her own power and everything like that, but she could just be part of the team and you don't even So we have a lot of people joining the company you do you have any bias towards it makes sense to just build it in my home. The beauty of all remote is we don't say you have to work from home. um, we talked to sit a little bit about, you know, does this remote work for every So you need to have a lot of self awareness in managing your day, and that includes taking breaks. and, um, you proactively look forward to moments like that because you don't get them is a flywheel of making the product better and then making the handbook better. So some of the companies When I'm dealing with dispersed and remote, how do you make How do you is so it can removes the burden of this nonstop string of slag messages where you have to respond to things So great to be able to chat with you in person and all of our coverage, whether you were at an event or watching remote or after it, we've got all the content for you to meet him in.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Darren Murph | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New Zealand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
65 countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Darrin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
GitLab | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
four straight years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 p.m. | DATE | 0.99+ |
about 17,000 articles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Britain | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
hundreds of people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 1100 employees | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 3000 pages | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Darren | PERSON | 0.97+ |
over 65 countries | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cambridge, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
About 10 million words | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
Zuma | PERSON | 0.96+ |
every two hours | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
about 50 50 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Guinness Book of World | TITLE | 0.92+ |
Get Live Handbook | TITLE | 0.88+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
first class | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.87+ |
3 articles a week | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ | |
each new deployment | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
How We Do | TITLE | 0.82+ |
dozens of people | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
7 | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
second class | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
Cubes | ORGANIZATION | 0.58+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
lab | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
Norm | PERSON | 0.55+ |
Docks | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.54+ |
Get Lab | ORGANIZATION | 0.53+ |
cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.49+ |
Lab | ORGANIZATION | 0.44+ |
net | ORGANIZATION | 0.41+ |
Cube | PERSON | 0.29+ |
Jeremy Daly, Serverless Chats | CUBEConversation January 2020
(upbeat music) >> From the Silicon Angle Media office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCube. Now, here's your host, Stu Miniman. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman, and welcome to the first interview of theCube in our Boston area studio for 2020. And to help me kick it off, Jeremy Daly who is the host of Serverless Chats as well as runs the Serverless Day Boston. Jeremy, saw you at reInvent, way back in 2019, and we'd actually had some of the people in the community that were like hey, "I think you guys like actually live and work right near each other." >> Right. >> And you're only about 20 minutes away from our office here, so thanks so much for making the long journey here, and not having to get on a plane to join us here. >> Well, thank you for having me. >> All right, so as Calvin from Calvin and Hobbes says, "It's a new decade, but we don't have any base on the moon, "we don't have flying cars that general people can use, "but we do have serverless." >> And our robot vacuum cleaners. >> We do have robot vacuum cleaners. >> Which are run by serverless, as a matter of fact. >> A CUBE alum on the program would be happy that we do get to mention there. So yeah, you know serverless there are things like the iRobot, as well as Alexa, or some of the things that people, you know usually when I'm explaining to people what this is, and they don't understand it, it's like, Oh, you've used Alexa, well those are the functions underneath, and you think about how these things turn on, and off, a little bit like that. But maybe, we don't need to get into the long ontological discussion or everything, but you know you're a serverless hero, so you know give us a little bit, what your hearing from people, what are some of the exciting use cases out there, and you know where serverless is being used in that maturity today. >> Yeah, I mean well, so the funny thing about serverless and the term serverless itself, and I do not want to get into a long discussion about this, obviously. I actually wrote a post last year that was called stop calling everything serverless, because basically people are calling everything serverless. So it really, what it, what I look at it as, is something where, it just makes it really easy for developers to abstract away that back end infrastructure, and not having to worry about setting up Kubernetes, or going through the process of setting up virtual machines and installing software is just, a lot of that stuff is kind of handled for you. And I think that is enabled, a lot of companies, especially start-ups is a huge market for serverless, but also enterprises. Enabled them to give more power to their developers, and be able to look at new products that they want to build, new services they want to tackle or even old services that they need to, you know that may have some stability issues or things like long running ETL tasks, and other things like that, that they found a way to sort of find the preferal edges of these monolithic applications or these mainframes that they are using and find ways to run very small jobs, you know using functions as a server, something like that. And so, I see a lot of that, I think that is a big use case. You see a lot of large companies doing. Obviously, people are building full fledged applications. So, yes, the web facing user application, certainly a thing. People are building API's, you got API Gateway, they just released the new HEDP API which makes it even faster. To run those sort of things, this idea of cold starts, you know in AWS trying to get rid of all that stuff, with the new VPC networking, and some of the things they are doing there. So you have a lot of those type of applications that people are building as well. But it really runs the gambit, there are things all across the board that you can do, and pretty much anything you can do with the traditional computing environment, you can do with a serverless computing environment. And obviously that's focusing quite a bit on the functions as a service side of things, which is a very tiny part of serverless, if you want to look at it, you know sort of the broader picture, this service full or managed services, type approach. And so, that's another thing that you see, where you used to have companies setting up you know, mySQL databases and clusters trying to run these things, or even worse, Cassandra rings, right. Trying to do these things and manage this massive amount of infrastructure, just so that they could write a few records to a database and read them back for their application. And that would take months sometimes, for them to get it setup and even more time to try to keep running them. So this sort of revolution of managed services and all these things we get now, whether that the things like managed elastic search or elastic search cloud doing that stuff for you, or Big Table and Dynamo DB, and Manage Cassandra, whatever those things are. I'm just thinking a lot easier for developers to just say hey, I need a database, and okay, here it is, and I don't have to worry about the infrastructure at all. So, I think you see a lot of people, and a lot of companies that are utilizing all of these different services now, and essentially are no longer trying to re-invent the wheel. >> So, a couple of years ago, I was talking to Andy Jassy, at an interview with theCube, and he said, "If I was to build AWS today, "I would've built it on serverless." And from what I've seen over the last two or three years or so, Amazon is rebuilding a lot of there servers underneath. It's very interesting to watch that platform changing. I think it's had some ripple effect dynamics inside the company 'cause Amazon is very well known for their two pizza teams and for all of their products are there, but I think it was actually in a conversation with you, we're talking about in some ways this new way of building things is, you know a connecting fabric between the various groups inside of Amazon. So, I love your view point that we shouldn't just call everything serverless, but in many ways, this is a revolution and a new way of thinking about building things and therefore, you know there are some organizational and dynamical changes that happen, for an Amazon, but for other people that start using it. >> Yeah, well I mean I actually was having a conversation with a Jay Anear, whose one of the product owners for Lambda, and he was saying to me, well how do we sell serverless. How do we tell people you know this is what the next way to do things. I said, just, it's the way, right. And Amazon is realized this, and part of the great thing about dog fooding your own product is that you say, okay I don't like the taste of this bit, so we're going to change it to make it work. And that's what Amazon has continued to do, so they run into limitations with serverless, just like us early adopters, run into limitations, and they say, we'll how do we make it better, how do we fix it. And they have always been really great to listening to customers. I complain all the time, there's other people that complain all the time, that say, "Hey, I can't do this." And they say, "Well what if we did it this way, and out of that you get things like Lambda Destinations and all different types of ways, you get Event Bridge, you get different ways that you can solve those problems and that comes out of them using their own services. So I think that's a huge piece of it, but that helps enable other teams to get past those barriers as well. >> Jeremy, I'm going to be really disappointed if in 2020, I don't see a T-shirt from one of the Serverless Days, with the Mandalorian on it, saying, "Serverless, this is the way." Great, great, great marketing opportunity, and I do love that, because some of the other spaces, you know we're not talking about a point product, or a simple thing we do, it is more the way of doing things, it's just like I think about Cybersecurity. Yes, there are lots of products involved here but, you know this is more of you know it's a methodology, it needs to be fully thought of across the board. You know, as to how you do things, so, let's dig in a little bit. At reInvent, there was, when I went to the serverless gathering, it was serverless for everyone. >> Serverless for everyone, yes. >> And there was you know, hey, serverless isn't getting talked, you know serverless isn't as front and center as some people might think. They're some people on the outside look at this and they say, "Oh, serverless, you know those people "they have a religion, and they go so deep on this." But I thought Tim Wagner had a really good blog post, that came out right after reInvent, and what we saw is not only Amazon changing underneath the way things are done, but it feel that there's a bridging between what's happening in Kubernetes, you see where Fargate is, Firecracker, and serverless and you know. Help us squint through that, and understand a little bit, what your seeing, what your take was at reInvent, what you like, what you were hoping to see and how does that whole containerization, and Kubernetes wave intersect with what we're doing with serverless? >> Yeah, well I mean for some reason people like Kubernetes. And I honestly, I don't think there is anything wrong with it, I think it's a great container orchestration system, I think containers are still a very important part of the workloads that we are putting into a cloud, I don't know if I would call them cloud native, exactly, but I think what we're seeing or at least what I'm seeing that I think Amazon is seeing, is they're saying people are embracing Kubernetes, and they are embracing containers. And whether or not containers are ephemeral or long running, which I read a statistic at some point, that was 63% of containers, so even running on Kubernetes, or whatever, run for less than 10 minutes. So basically, most computing that's happening now, is fairly ephemeral. And as you go up, I think it's 15 minutes or something like that, I think it's 70% or 90% or whatever that number is, I totally got that wrong. But I think what Amazon is doing is they're trying to basically say, look we were trying to sell serverless to everyone. We're trying to sell this idea of look managed services, managed compute, the idea that we can run even containers as close to the metal as possible with something like Fargate which is what Firecracker is all about, being able to run virtual machines basically, almost you know right on the metal, right. I mean it's so close that there's no level of abstraction that get in the way and slow things down, and even though we're talking about milliseconds or microseconds, it's still something and there's efficiencies there. But I think what they looked at is, they said look at we are not Apple, we can't kill Flash, just because we say we're not going to support it anymore, and I think you mention this to me in the past where the majority of Kubernetes clusters that were running in the Public Cloud, we're running in Amazon anyways. And so, you had using virtual machines, which are great technology, but are 15 years old at this point. Even containerization, there's more problems to solve there, getting to the point where we say, look you want to take this container, this little bit of code, or this small service and you want to just run this somewhere. Why are we spinning up virtual containers. Why are we using 15 or 10 year old technology to do that. And Amazon is just getting smarter about it. So Amazon says hay, if we can run a Lambda function on Firecracker, and we can run a Fargate container on Firecracker, why can't we run, you know can we create some pods and run some pods for Kubernetes on it. They can do that. And so, I think for me, I was disappointed in the keynotes, because I don't think there was enough serverless talk. But I think what they're trying to do, is there trying to and this is if I put my analyst hat on for a minute. I think they're trying to say, the world is at Kubernetes right now. And we need to embrace that in a way, that says we can run your Kubernetes for you, a lot more efficiently and without you having to worry about it than if you use Google or if you use some other cloud provider, or if you run on-prem. Which I think is the biggest competitor to Amazon is still on-prem, especially in the enterprise world. So I see them as saying, look we're going to focus on Kubernetes, but as a way that we can run it our way. And I think that's why, Fargate and Kubernetes, or the Kubernetes for Fargate, or whatever that new product is. Too many product names at AWS. But I think that's what they are trying to do and I think that was the point of this, is to say, "Listen you can run your Kubernetes." And Claire Legore who showed that piece at the keynote, Vernor's keynote that was you know basically how quickly Fargate can scale up Kubernetes, you know individual containers, Kubernetes, as opposed to you know launching new VM's or EC2 instances. So I thought that was really interesting. But that was my overall take is just that they're embracing that, because they think that's where the market is right now, and they just haven't yet been able to sell this idea of serverless even though you are probably using it with a bunch of things anyways, at least what they would consider serverless. >> Yeah, to part a little bit from the serverless for a second. Talk about multi-cloud, it was one of the biggest discussions, we had in 2019. When I talk to customers that are using Kubernetes, one of the reasons that they tell me they're doing it, "Well, I love Amazon, I really like what I'm doing, "but if I needed to move something, it makes it easier." Yes, there are some underlying services I would have to re-write, and I'm looking at all those. I've talked to customers that started with Kubernetes, somewhere other than Amazon, and moved it to Amazon, and they said it did make my life easier to be able to do that fundamental, you know the container piece was easy move that piece of it, but you know the discussion of multi-cloud gets very convoluted, very easily. Most customers run it when I talk to them, it's I have an application that I run, in a cloud, sometimes, there's certain, you know large financials will choose two of everything, because that's the way they've always done things for regulation. And therefore they might be running the same application, mirrored in two different clouds. But it is not follow the sun, it is not I wake up and I look at the price of things, and deploy it to that. And that environment it is a little bit tougher, there's data gravity, there's all these other concerns. But multi-cloud is just lots of pieces today, more than a comprehensive strategy. The vision that I saw, is if multi-cloud is to be a successful strategy, it should be more valuable than the sum of its pieces. And I don't see many examples of that yet. What do you see when it comes to multi-cloud and how does that serverless discussion fit in there? >> I think your point about data gravity is the most important thing. I mean honestly compute is commoditized, so whether your running it in a container, and that container runs in Fargate or orchestrated by Kubernetes, or runs on its own somewhere, or something's happening there, or it's a fast product and it's running on top of K-native or it's running in a Lambda function or in an Azure function or something like that. Compute itself is fairly commoditized, and yes there's wiring that's required for each individual cloud, but even if you were going to move your Kubernetes cluster, like you said, there's re-writes, you have to change the way you do things underneath. So I look at multi-cloud and I think for a large enterprise that has a massive amount of compliance, regulations and things like that they have to deal with, yeah maybe that's a strategy they have to embrace, and hopefully they have the money and tech staff to do that. I think the vast majority of companies are going to find that multi-cloud is going to be a completely wasteful and useless exercise that is essentially going to waste time and money. It's so hard right now, keeping up with everything new that comes out of one cloud right, try keeping up with everything that comes out of three clouds, or more. And I think that's something that doesn't make a lot of sense, and I don't think you're going to see this price gauging like we would see with something. Probably the wrong term to use, but something that we would see, sort of lock-in that you would see with Oracle or with Microsoft SQL, some of those things where the licensing became an issue. I don't think you're going to see that with cloud. And so, what I'm interested in though in terms of the term multi-cloud, is the fact that for me, multi-cloud really where it would be beneficial, or is beneficial is we're talking about SaaS vendors. And I look at it and I say, look it you know Oracle has it's own cloud, and Google has it's own cloud, and all these other companies have their own cloud, but so does Salesforce, when you think about it. So does Twilio, even though Twilio runs inside AWS, really its I'm using that service and the AWS piece of it is abstracted, that to me is a third party service. Stripe is a third-party service. These are multi-cloud structure or SaaS products that I'm using, and I'm going to be integrating with all those different things via API's like we've done for quite some time now. So, to me, this idea of multi-cloud is simply going to be, you know it's about interacting with other products, using the right service for the right job. And if your duplicating your compute or you're trying to write database services or something like that that you can somehow share with multiple clouds, again, I don't see there being a huge value, except for a very specific group of customers. >> Yeah, you mentioned the term cloud-native earlier, and you need to understand are you truly being cloud-native or are you kind of cloud adjacent, are you leveraging a couple of things, but you're really, you haven't taken advantage of the services and the promise of what these cloud options can offer. All right, Jeremy, 2020 we've turned the calendar. What are you looking at, you know you're planning, you got serverless conference, Serverless Days-- >> Serverless Days Boston. >> Boston, coming up-- >> April 6th in Cambridge. >> So give us a little views to kind of your view point for the year, the event itself, you got your podcast, you got a lot going on. >> Yeah, so my podcast, Serverless Chats. You know I talk to people that are in the space, and we usually get really really technical. So if you're a serverless geek or you like that kind of stuff definitely listen to that. But yeah, but 2020 for me though, this is where I see what is happened to serverless, and this goes back to my "Stop calling everything serverless" post, was this idea that we keep making serverless harder. And so, as a someone whose a serverless purist, I think at this point. I recognize and it frustrates me that it is so difficult now to even though we're abstracting away running that infrastructure, we still have to be very aware of what pieces of the infrastructure we are using. Still have setup the SQS Queue, still have to setup Event Bridge. We still have to setup the Lambda function and API gateways and there's services that make it easier for us, right like we can use a serverless framework, or the SAM framework, or ARCH code or architect framework. There's a bunch of these different ones that we can use. But the problem is that it's still very very tough, to understand how to stitch all this stuff together. So for me, what I think we're going to see in 2020, and I know there is hints for this serverless framework just launched their components. There's other companies that are doing similar things in the space, and that's basically creating, I guess what I would call an abstraction as a service, where essentially it's another layer of abstraction, on top of the DSL's like Terraform or Cloud Formation, and essentially what it's doing is it's saying, "I want to launch an API that does X-Y-Z." And that's the outcome that I want. Understanding all the best practices, am I supposed to use Lambda Destinations, do I use DLQ's, what should I throttle it at? All these different settings and configurations and knobs, even though they say that there's not a lot of knobs, there's a lot of knobs that you can turn. Encapsulating that and being able to share that so that other people can use it. That in and of itself would be very powerful, but where it becomes even more important and I think definitely from an enterprise standpoint, is to say, listen we have a team that is working on these serverless components or abstractions or whatever they are, and I want Team X to be able to use, I want them to be able to launch an API. Well you've got security concerns, you've got all kinds of things around compliance, you have what are the vetting process for third-party libraries, all that kind of stuff. If you could say to Team X, hey listen we've got this component, or this piece of, this abstracted piece of code for you, that you can take and now you can just launch an API, serverless API, and you don't have to worry about any of the regulations, you don't have to go to the attorneys, you don't have to do any of that stuff. That is going to be an extremely powerful vehicle for companies to adopt things quickly. So, I think that you have teams now that are experimenting with all of these little knobs. That gets very confusing, it gets very frustrating, I read articles all the time, that come out and I read through it, and this is all out of date, because things have changed so quickly and so if you have a way that your teams, you know and somebody who stays on top of the learning this can keep these things up to date, follow the most, you know leading practices or the best practices, whatever you want to call them. I think that's going to be hugely important step from making it to the teams that can adopt serverless more quickly. And I don't think the major cloud vendors are doing anything in this space. And I think SAM is a good idea, but basically SAM is just a re-write of the serverless framework. Whereas, I think that there's a couple of companies who are looking at it now, how do we take this, you know whatever, this 1500 line Cloud Formation template, how do we boil that down into two or three lines of configuration, and then a little bit of business logic. Because that's where we really want to get to. It's just we're writing business logic, we're no where near there right now. There's still a lot of stuff that has to be done, around configuration and so even though it's nice to say, hey we can just write some business logic and all the infrastructure is handled for us. The infrastructure is handled for us, if we configure it correctly. >> Yeah, really remind me some of the general thread we've been talking about, Cloud for a number of years is, remember back in the early days, is cloud is supposed to be inexpensive and easy to use, and of course in today's world, it isn't either of those things. So serverless needs to follow those threads, you know love some of those view points Jeremy. I want to give you the final word, you've got your Serverless Day Boston, you got your podcast, best way to get in touch with you, and keep up with all you're doing in 2020. >> Yeah, so @Jeremy_daly on Twitter. I'm pretty active on Twitter, and I put all my stuff out there. Serverless Chats podcast, you can just find, serverlesschats.com or any of the Pod catchers that you use. I also publish a newsletter that basically talks about what I'm talking about now, every week called Off by None, which is, collects a bunch of serverless links and gives them some IoPine on some of them, so you can go to offbynone.io and find that. My website is jeremydaly.com and I blog and keep up to date on all the kind of stuff that I do with serverless there. >> Jeremy, great content, thanks so much for joining us on theCube. Really glad and always love to shine a spotlight here in the Boston area too. >> Appreciate it. >> I'm Stu Miniman. You can find me on the Twitter's, I'm just @Stu thecube.net is of course where all our videos will be, we'll be at some of the events for 2020. Look for me, look for our co-hosts, reach out to us if there's an event that we should be at, and as always, thank you for watching theCube. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
From the Silicon Angle Media office that were like hey, "I think you guys like actually live and not having to get on a plane to join us here. "we don't have flying cars that general people can use, and you know where serverless is being used that they need to, you know and therefore, you know there are some organizational and out of that you get things like Lambda Destinations You know, as to how you do things, and they say, "Oh, serverless, you know those people and I think you mention this to me in the past and I look at the price of things, and deploy it to that. that you can somehow share with multiple clouds, again, and you need to understand are you truly being cloud-native for the year, the event itself, you got your podcast, and so if you have a way that your teams, I want to give you the final word, serverlesschats.com or any of the Pod catchers that you use. Really glad and always love to shine a spotlight and as always, thank you for watching theCube.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Claire Legore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tim Wagner | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeremy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeremy Daly | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
63% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
15 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
less than 10 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
jeremydaly.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Jay Anear | PERSON | 0.99+ |
January 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Calvin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
April 6th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
offbynone.io | OTHER | 0.99+ |
three lines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
serverlesschats.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lambda | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two different clouds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
@Jeremy_daly | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Twilio | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three clouds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
about 20 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
1500 line | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first interview | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two pizza teams | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Lambda | TITLE | 0.96+ |
one cloud | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Alexa | TITLE | 0.96+ |
theCube | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.94+ |
each individual cloud | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Serverless Days | EVENT | 0.93+ |
Big Table | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Steve Touw & Rob Lancaster, Immuta | AWS re:Invent 2019
>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE! Covering AWS re:Invent 2019. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services and Intel, along with it's ecosystem partners. >> Welcome inside Live here at the Sands as we continue our coverage of AWS re:Invent 2019 on theCUBE, day three. Always an exciting time I think to get a summary of what's happened here. Dave Vellante, John Walls, we're joined by a couple of gentlemen from Immuta, Steven Touw who's a co-founder and CTO. Steve, good to see you. >> Yeah thanks for having me. >> John Walls: And Rob Lancaster, who's the GM of Cloud at Immuta. Rob, thanks for joining us as well. >> Great to be here. >> First off, let's talk about Immuta a little bit. You're all about governance right? You're trying to make it simple, easy, taking out the complexity. But for those at home who might not be too familiar with your company, tell us a little bit about you. >> Yeah so the company started out, our roots are in the U.S. intelligence community. So we had been dealing with access and control issues for data for years and we said to ourselves, "Hey this product has to be useful for non-IC customers. "This problem has to exist." And with the advent of all these privacy regulations like CCPA, GDPR and of course HIPPA's been around for a long time, really our goal was to bring a product to the market that makes it easy to govern access to data in a way that you don't have to be technical to do it, you don't have to understand how to write SQL statements, you don't have to be a system administrator. We really bring together three personas, the users that want to get access to the data, legal compliance that needs to understand how the rules are being enforced or even enforce them themselves, and then of course the data owners and the DBAs who need to expose the data. So usually those three personas are at odds with one another, we bring them together in our platform and allow them to work together in a way that's compliant and also accelerates their data analytics. >> Could we talk a little bit about why this is such a problem? Because it is a big problem and especially today and in the cloud and we'll get into that, but you've got data lakes, data oceans now, you got data coming in, all types of data. Might be internal transaction data, it might be stuff in your data warehouse. And the organization say, "Well I want some other data. "I want to bring in maybe some social data." So certain data is, everybody can have access to. Certain data not everybody can have access to. And it's not necessarily just a security problem, edicts of my organization that need to be enforced. So first of all, is that sort of, the problem that you're solving? And maybe you can double-click on that a little bit. >> Yeah sure, so the market has evolved and is evolving. You allude to data lakes, I think you can point to the immersion of Hadoop, as a distributed infrastructure as kind of the original data lakes, or the most recent data lakes, where you can store all your data and run analytics on all your data, and now with the advent, with the emergence of Cloud you've effectively got very low, if not zero cost storage, and the ability to throw an unlimited amount of compute at the data. That, kind of in conjunction with heightened awareness for consumer data privacy and risk associated with data, has created a market for data governance beyond kind of the course-grained access controls that people have been using on their databases for decades now. >> Yeah I mean Hadoop really got it all started. You're right and despite all it's problems, it had some real epiphany-like technical innovations, but one of the things that it didn't worry about at the time was governance. So whose responsibility is this? Is it the CISO? That is essentially trying to build out a new cloud stack to provide security, privacy, governance and what does that stack look like? >> Rob: Go ahead. >> Yeah so it depends, it's actually pretty interesting that different organizations have tackled this different ways. So we have CISOs that maintain this. In other organizations we've got the legal compliance teams that want to do this but maybe don't have the technical chops. And the CISO doesn't necessarily know all the privacy rules that need to be enforced, so it's kind of moving into this world where security is about keeping the bad guys out and black or white access, like you either can see the data or you won't, but with privacy controls it gets into this gray area where there's a lot of technical complexity and there's a lot of legal complexity. So the organizations struggle with this 'cause you've got to play in that gray area where it's not just like I said, black and white. The analogy we use is, security is like a light switch, you're either in or you're out. With privacy controls you need to anonymize the data, you need to do privacy by design. It's like a dimmer switch where you want to play in that gray area and allow some utility out of the data but also protect privacy at differing levels of whatever you're doing analytically. So this can be challenging for an organization to wrestle with because it's not as, I would argue it's not as black and white as it is with security. >> Your question is in many cases it's the business that's running really fast and that is building these data lakes because they want to get value out of their data and the CISO or the compliance or risk officers are the ones that are telling them to slow down. So our product that Steve set up caters to both parties. It checks the boxes for risk, but it also enable the business to get utility out of their data lake. >> It's a very complicated situation because you've got this corpus of data that's organic and constantly changing and you have, you mentioned GDPR, you've got California now, every state's going to have it's own regulations so you've got to be able to sort of adjudicate that. And can you talk about, I mean obviously I've interviewed Matt Carroll, we covered you guys so I know a little bit about you, but can you talk about your tech in terms of it's ability? You've got a capability to do really granular level understanding and governance policies, can you describe that a little bit? >> Yeah sure, so when we talk about privacy controls, these are things like way beyond just table-level access. So instead of saying, "Hey you have access to this table or not," or even, "You have access to this column or not," you've got to go deeper than that, you've got to be able to make rows disappear based on what people are doing. So for example, we have financial institution customers that are using us for all their trading data and only some traders can see some trade desks and we manage all that dynamically. We're not making anonymized copies of data. Everything happens at query time, and depending on what compute you're using that all works differently, but then at the column level we're able to do these anonymization techniques like we could make numeric data less specific, we could use techniques like k-anonymization that allows analysts to analyze the data but ensures that small groups that exist in that data won't reveal someone's true identity. And we have techniques like differential privacy, which provides mathematical guarantees of privacy. So for example, one of our manufacturing customers set aside, these are the four analytical use cases that we're using our data for and under GDPR we want different levels of privacy associated to those use cases. So they could do that all with Immuta. So they could say, "When I'm doing this "I want these columns to be anonymized to this level "and these rows to disappear, but if I'm doing something, "maybe more critical, which our consumers have consented to "you know there's less privacy controls." And that all happens dynamically so the analysts could actually switch context of what they're doing and get a different view of the data and all of that is audited so we understand why someone's doing what they're doing and when they're running queries we can associate those queries to purpose. >> We've talked about customers of course and they're adapting right, to a new world? How are you adapting? I mean what are you learning about, in terms of policy regulation and governance, what have you, you said you came out of the intelligence community, high bar there right? >> Steven Touw: Yeah. >> So what have you done to evolve as a company and what are you, as the headlights basically for these folks, what are you seeing change that is going to require a lot of shift on the other side? >> Yeah so, I don't know if you have thoughts. >> I mean it's a great question but there's really two parts to it, there's what are we doing? But, what is the market doing as well, right? So if you think about when we got started, even a year ago people understood the technology, they thought it was cool but maybe a little nichey for government or financial services or maybe healthcare because there's well understood regulation, these vertical regulation. Even over the past year with kind of this increasing or heightened awareness for consumer data privacy, not just driven by CCPA and GDPR but kind of this, call it the Facebook Effect right? Cambridge Analytica has created this awareness within the general population for what are these organizations actually doing with my data? Before it was okay 'cause you give your data to Google and you get a better search result and you're okay with that but now they may be using your data for their own profit in different ways so this has created this rising tides effect for the overall market and we talk a lot about organizations using something like Immuta to protect their highly sensitive data. I like to think of it is their most valuable data, which may be highly sensitive but it also could be the crown jewels, trading data for a bank for example. So it's become about extracting value and operational benefit from data, whereas the risk offices are trying to lock it down in many cases. >> So, there's definitely a big problem and people are becoming more aware of it. I want to talk about where you guys fit into this whole cloud ecosystem. There's a sea change now, there's this sort of, this new cloud coming into play. It's not just about infrastructure anymore. I'll give you some examples, you got all these data lakes, maybe you got Redshift running, Snowflake's another one, you've now got this data exchange where you can bring data right in the Cloud bring in all different types of data, you're bringing in some AML and AI and it's all, really again, a complicated situation. So I see you guys as fitting in there and real need but can you describe where you fit in the ecosystem, what your relationship is with AWS, how do I engage with you? >> Yeah absolutely, so a core part of our value is that we are heterogeneous in terms of the environment that we support. We support a hybrid estate so the architecture of the product is fully microservices based so we can run on PRIM as well as on Cloud, on any Cloud, we support effectively any popular database system or analytical tool. So think of us as a data abstraction layer across a hybrid environment, so we're here because AWS is obviously the big boy in the market, they have market share, this is a strategic relationship for us. We're working very deeply with AWS field teams, particularly around some of their verticals, the verticals that align to our business and at the end of the day we're trying to define a category. It's a similar category that we've had for decades but with all the changes that are happening in data and regulation and infrastructure what we're trying to do is raise the level of awareness for the fact that Immuta has actually solved the problem that many of these risk officers are struggling with today. >> Yeah and from a, diving a little on the technical side of that answer is that we are, think of us as the way to enforce policy in the Cloud. We consider ourselves a Cloud-first software vendor. And you don't necessarily want one point solution in Redshift or another point solution on your on-premise Cloudera instance, whatever it may be where you're using your data and running analytics, you need to abstract the policies out into a consistent layer and then have them be enforced across whatever you're using. So you might be using Cloudera today and then you switch to Databricks tomorrow, that shouldn't be a hard change from you from a policy perspective. You just re-point Immuta at Databricks and all your policies are still working like they used to so it gives you this flexibility now to use all these different services that AWS provides 'cause as was stated in the keynote on Tuesday, there's no one database solves all. You're always going to be using a heterogenous set of compute to do your job in analytics so you need a consistent way to enforce policies across all of that. >> That's a great point. I mean I don't know if you saw the Vanguard guy today in the keynote, he basically said, "We rip down, or tore down our big data infrastructure "moved it to the Cloud, spun up EMR." I mean there's a perfect example of, you got to bring your governance with you. You can't have to rebuild that whole stack. Are you in the Marketplace yet? >> Steve and Rob: Yes. >> You are, great, awesome. >> Yeah we launched a managed version of Immuta over the summer on AWS Marketplace. We'll be launching a second one shortly and it's really, the offering that we have out there is really geared toward, for lack of a better term, democratizing data governance. It's actually free up to the fifth user so any organization can deploy Immuta in under 30 minutes through Marketplace and start protecting their data. >> That's great, we had Dave McCann on yesterday, he runs the Marketplace, he was telling us just now, private offers for every marketplace, so ICV, so that's from. Last question I have is, how do you see this all playing out? You got GDPR, remember you talked about California regulations, there's a technology component, any predictions you guys want to share? What's your telescope say? >> All data will be regulated data eventually. So if you're not thinking about that now you need to. So, at least that's our theory, obviously, so we think it's critical that you're doing that from day one instead of day 365 and in your migration strategy. And if you're not thinking about that it's going to potentially bite you in the ass. >> Yeah you're right, I mean Web 2.0 was the wild, wild west, there was no privacy, there was no regulation, GDPR started to get people focused on that and it's now a whole new world. >> Gentlemen thank you, appreciate the time and best of luck. I know you said you had the big launch this summer but good things are ahead no doubt. >> For sure, thank you. >> Thank you. >> Dave Vellante: Thanks guys. >> Back with more coverage here on theCUBE. You're watching AWS re:Invent 2019. We are live and we're in Las Vegas. (upbeat tones)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Amazon Web Services and Intel, Welcome inside Live here at the Sands Rob, thanks for joining us as well. taking out the complexity. and the DBAs who need to expose the data. and in the cloud and we'll get into that, and the ability to throw but one of the things that it didn't worry about all the privacy rules that need to be enforced, are the ones that are telling them to slow down. and you have, you mentioned GDPR, you've got California now, and all of that is audited so we understand why and you get a better search result and you're okay with that I want to talk about where you guys fit and at the end of the day we're trying to define a category. Yeah and from a, diving a little on the technical side you got to bring your governance with you. and it's really, the offering that we have out there any predictions you guys want to share? it's going to potentially bite you in the ass. and it's now a whole new world. I know you said you had the big launch this summer Back with more coverage here on theCUBE.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Lancaster | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steven Touw | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Walls | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Touw | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Matt Carroll | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave McCann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three personas | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two parts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cambridge Analytica | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both parties | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Immuta | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
under 30 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.98+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
four analytical use cases | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
fifth user | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
CCPA | TITLE | 0.97+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.96+ |
Vanguard | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
second one | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Redshift | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Immuta | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
day three | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Hadoop | TITLE | 0.85+ |
Invent 2019 | TITLE | 0.83+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
CISO | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
day 365 | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Immuta | PERSON | 0.81+ |
first software | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
this summer | DATE | 0.76+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.74+ |
Marketplace | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
ICV | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.71+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
U.S. | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
SQL | TITLE | 0.69+ |
Cloudera | TITLE | 0.69+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
Sands | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
Marketplace | TITLE | 0.62+ |
Bryan Liles, VMware | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2019
>>Ly from San Diego, California. It's the cube covering to clock in cloud native con brought to you by red hat, the cloud native computing foundation and its ecosystem Marsh. >>Welcome back to San Diego. I'm Stewman and my cohost is Justin Warren. And coming back to our program, one of our cube alumni and be coach hair of this coupon cloud native con prion Lyles who is also a senior staff engineer at VMware. Brian, thanks so much for joining us. Thanks for having me on. And do you want to have a shout out of course to a Vicky Chung who is your coach hair. She has been doing a lot of work. She came to our studio ahead of it to do a preview and unfortunately she's supposed to be sitting here but a little under the weather. And we know there was nothing worse than, you know, doing travel and you know, fighting an illness. But she's a little sick today, but um, uh, she knows that we'll, we'll, we'll still handle it. Alright, so Brian, 12,000 people here in attendance. >>Uh, more keynotes than most of us can keep a track of. So, first of all, um, congratulations. Uh, things seem to be going well other than maybe, uh, choosing the one day of the year that it rained in, uh, you know, San Diego, uh, which we we can't necessarily plan for. Um, I'd love you to bring us a little bit insight as to some of the, the, the goals and the themes that, uh, you know, you and Vicki and the, the, the, the, the community we're, we're looking at for, for this coupon. So you're right, let's help thousand people and so many sponsors and so many ideas and so many projects, it's really hard to have a singular theme. But a few months ago we came up with was, well, if, if Kubernetes in this cloud software make us better or basically advances, then we can do more advanced things. >>And then our end users can be more advanced. And it was like a three pong thing. And if you look, go back and look at our keynotes, he would say, Hey, we're looking at our software. Hey, we're looking at an amazing things that we did, especially cat by that five G keynote yesterday. And the notice that we had, it was me talking about how we could look forward and then, and then notice we had in talking about security and then we had Walmart and target talking about how they're using it and, and that was all on purpose. It's trying to tell a story that people can go back and look at. Yeah, I liked the, the message that you were, you were trying to put out there around how we need to make Kubernetes a little bit easier, but how we need to change the way that we talk about it as well. >>So maybe you could, uh, fill us in a little bit more. Let's say, unfortunately, Kubernetes is not going to get an easier, um, that's like saying we wish Linux was easier to use. Um, Linux has a huge ABI and API interface. It's not going to get easier. So what we need to do is start doing what we did with Linux and Linux is the Colonel. Um, this should be some Wars happened over the years and you notice some distributions are easier to use. Another. So if you use the current fedora or you the current Ubuntu or even like mint, it's getting really easy to use. And I'm not suggesting that we need Kubernetes distributions. That's actually the furthest thing, but we do need to work on building our ecosystem on top of Kubernetes because I mentioned like CIS CD, um, observability security audit management and who knows what else we need to start thinking about those things as pretty much first-class items. >>Just as important as Kubernetes. Kubernetes is the Colonel. Yeah. Um, in the keynotes, there's, as you said, there's such a broad landscape here. Uh, uh, I've heard some horror stories that people like, Oh, Hey, where do I start? And they're like, Oh, here's the CNCF landscape. And they're like, um, I can't start there. There's too much there. Uh, you, you picked out and highlighted, um, some of the lesser known pieces. Uh, th there's some areas that are a little bit mature. What, what are some of the more exciting things that you've seen going on right now, your system and this ecosystem? >> Um, I'm not even gonna. I highlighted open policy agent as a, as an interesting product. I don't know if it's the right answer, actually. I kind of wish there was a competitor just so I could determine if it was the right answer. >>But things like OPA and then like open telemetry, um, two projects coming together and having even bigger goals. Uh, let's make a severability easy. What I would also like to see is a little bit more, more maturity and the workflow space. So, you know, the CII and CD space. And I know with Argo and flux merging to Argo flux, uh, that's very interesting. And just a little bit of a tidbit is that I, I also co-chair the CNCF SIG application delivery, uh, special interest group, but, uh, we're thinking about that, that space right there. So I would love to see more in the workflow space, but then also I would like to see more security tools and not just old school check, check, check, but, um, think about what Aqua security is doing. And I'm, I don't know if they're now Snick or S, I don't know how to say it, but, um, there's, there's companies out there rethinking security. >>Let's do that. Yeah. I spoke to Snick a couple of days ago and it's, I'm pretty sure it's sneak. Apparently it stands for, so now you know, which that was news to me that, so now I know interesting. But they have a lot of good projects coming up. Yeah. You mentioned that the ecosystem and that you like that there's competitors for particular projects to kind of explore which way is the right way of doing things. We have a lot of exhibitors here and we have a lot of competitors out there trying to come into this ecosystem. It seems to actually be growing even bigger. Are we going to see a period of consolidation where some of these competing options, we decided that actually no, we don't want to use that. We want to go over here. I mean according to crossing the chasm, yes, but we need to figure out where we are on the maturity chart for, for the whole ecosystem. >>So I think in a healthy, healthy ecosystem, people don't succeed and products go away, but then what we see is in maybe six months or a year or two later, those same founders are out there creating new products. So not everyone's going to win on their first shot. So I think that's fine because, you know, we've all had failures in the past, but we're still better for those failures. Yeah, I've heard it described as a kind of Cambridge and explosion at the moment. So hopefully we don't get an asteroid that comes in and, uh, and hopefully it is out cause yeah. Um, one of the things really, really noticed is, uh, if you went back a year or even two years ago, we were talking about very much the infrastructure, the building blocks of what we had. Uh, I really noticed front and center, especially in the keynote here, talking a lot about the workload. >>You're talking about the application. We're talking about, uh, you know, much more up the stack and uh, from kind of that application, uh, uh, piece down, even, uh, some friends of mine that were new to this ecosystem was like, I don't understand what language they're talking. I'm like, well, they're talking to the app devs. That's why, you know, they're not speaking to you. Is that, was that intentional? >> Well, I mean for me it is because I like to speak to the app devs and I realized that infrastructure comes and goes. I've been doing this for decades now and I've seen the rise of Cisco as, as a networking platform and I've seen their ups and downs. I've worked in security. But what I know is fundamentals are, are just that. And I would like to speak to the developers now because we need to get back to the developers because they create the value. >>I mean the only people who win at selling via our selling Kubernetes are vendors of Kubernetes. So, you know, I work for one and then there's the clouds and then there's other companies as well. So the thing that stays constant are people are building applications and ultimately if Kubernetes and the cloud native landscape can't take care of those application developers remember happened, remember, um, OpenStack, and not in like a negative way, but remember OpenStack, it got to be so hard that people couldn't even focus on what gave value. >> Unlike obvious fact leaves on it. It's still being used a lot in, in service providers and so on. So technology never really goes away completely. It just may fade off and live in a corner and then we move on to whatever's the next newest and greatest thing and then end up reinventing ourselves and having to do all of the same problems again. >>It feels a little bit like that with sometimes the Kubernetes way where haven't we already sold this? Linux is still here, Linux is still, and Linux is still growing. I mean Linux is over Virgin five right now and Linux is adapting and bringing in new things in a Colonel and moving things out to the user land. Kubernetes needs to figure out how to do that as well. Yeah, no Brian, I think it's a great point. You know, I'm an infrastructure guy and we know the only reason infrastructure exists is to serve up that application. What Matt managed to the business, my application, my data. Um, you and your team have some open source projects that you're involved in. Maybe give us a little bit about right? So oxen is a, so let me tell you the quick story. Joe Beda and I talked about how do we approach developers where they are. >>And one thing came up really early in that conversation was, well, why don't we just tell developers where things are broken? So come to find out using Kubernetes object model and a little bit of computer science, like just a tiny little bit. You can actually build this graph where everything is connected and then all you need to do then is determine if for any type of object, is it working or is it not working? So now look at this. Now I can actually show you what's broken and what's not broken. And what makes octane a little bit different is that we also wrapped it with a dashboard that shows everything inside of a Kubernetes cluster. And then we made it extensible. And just, just a crazy thing. I made a plugin API one weekend because I'm like, Oh, that would be kind of cool. And just at this conference alone, nine to 10 people to walk up to me and said, Oh, um, we use oxygen and we use your plugin system. >>And now we've done things that I can't imagine, and I think I might've said this, I know I've said it somewhere recently, but the hallmark of a good platform is when people start creating things you could never imagine on it. And that's what Linux did. That's what Kubernetes is doing. And octane is doing it in the small right now. So kudos to me and me really and my team that's really exciting. So fry, Oakton, Coobernetti's and Tansu both are seven sided. Uh, was, was that, that, that uh, uh, moving to, uh, to, to eight, uh, so no marketing. Okay. And I don't profess to understand what marketing is. Someone just named it. And I said, you know what, I'm a developer. I don't really mind w as long as you can call it something, that's fine. I do like the idea that we should evolve the number of platonic solids. >>There's another answer too. So if you think about what seven is, it, um, people were thinking ahead and said, well, someone could actually take that and use it as another connotation. So I was like, all right, we'll just get out of that. That's why it's called octane, but still nautical theme. Okay, great. Brian. So much going on. You know, even outside of this facility, there's things going on. Uh, any hidden gems that just the, you know, our audience that's watching or people that we'll look back at this event and say, Hey, you know, here's some cool little things there. I mean, they hit the Twitters, I'm sure they'll see the therapy dogs and whatnot, but you know, for the people geeking out, some of those hidden gems that you'd want to share. Um, some of the hidden gems or I'll, I'll throw up to, um, watch what these end-user companies are doing and watch what, like the advanced companies like Walmart and target and capital one are doing. >>I just think there's a lot of lessons to be learned and think about this. They have a crazy amount of money. They're actually investing time in this. It might be a good idea. And other hidden gyms are, are companies that are embracing the, the extension model of Kubernetes through custom resource definitions and building things. So the other day I had the tests on, on the stage, and they're not the only example of this, but running my sequel and Coobernetti's and it pretty much works all well, let's see what we can run with this. So I think that there's going to be a lot more companies that are going to invest in this space and, and, and actually deliver on these types of products. And, and I think that's a very interesting space. Yeah. We, we spoke to Bloomberg just before and uh, we talked to the tests, we spoke to Subaru from the test yesterday. >>Uh, seeing how people are using Kubernetes to build these systems, which can then be built upon themselves. Right. I think that's, that's probably for me, one of the more interesting things is that we end up with a platform and then we build more platforms on top of it. But we, we're creating these higher levels of abstraction, which actually gets us closer to just being able to do the work that we want to do as developers. I don't need to think about how all of the internals work, which again to your keynote today is like, I don't want to write machine code and I just want to solve this sort of business problem. If we can embed that into the, into this ecosystem, then it just makes everyone's lives much, much easier. So you basically, that is my secret. I'm really, I know people hate it for attractions and they say they will, but no one hates an abstraction. >>You don't actually turn the crank in your motor to make the car run. You press the accelerator and it goes. Yeah. Um, so we need to figure out the correct attractions and we do that through iteration and failure, but I'm liking that people are pushing the boundaries and uh, like Joe beta and Kelsey Hightower said is that Kubernetes is a platform of platforms. It is basically an API for writing API APIs. Let's take advantage of that and write API APIs. All right. Well, Brian, thank you. Thank Vicky. Uh, please, uh, you know, share, congratulations to the team for everything done here. And while you might be stepping down as, or we do hope you'll come and join us back on the cube at a future event. No, I enjoyed talking to you all, so thank you. Alright, thanks so much Brian for Justin Warren we'll be back with more of our water wall coverage. CubeCon cloud native con here in San Diego. Thanks for watching the queue.
SUMMARY :
clock in cloud native con brought to you by red hat, the cloud native computing foundation And we know there was nothing worse than, you know, doing travel and you know, uh, you know, you and Vicki and the, the, the, the, the community we're, we're looking at for, And the notice that we Kubernetes is not going to get an easier, um, that's like saying we wish Linux was easier to use. Um, in the keynotes, there's, as you said, there's such a broad landscape I don't know if it's the right answer, actually. I don't know if they're now Snick or S, I don't know how to say it, but, um, You mentioned that the ecosystem and that you like that there's competitors So I think that's fine because, you know, we've all had failures in the We're talking about, uh, you know, much more up the stack and uh, to speak to the developers now because we need to get back to the developers because they create the value. I mean the only people who win at selling via our selling Kubernetes are vendors of Kubernetes. It just may fade off and live in a corner and then we move on to whatever's the next newest and greatest and moving things out to the user land. And just at this conference alone, nine to 10 people to walk up to me and said, And I don't profess to understand what any hidden gems that just the, you know, our audience that's watching or people that we'll look back at I just think there's a lot of lessons to be learned and think about this. I don't need to think about how all of the internals work, which again to your keynote today is like, Uh, please, uh, you know, share, congratulations to the team for everything done
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Justin Warren | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Subaru | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Walmart | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vicky | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Diego | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vicky Chung | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joe Beda | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bryan Liles | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Diego, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
12,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stewman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vicki | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bloomberg | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first shot | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lyles | PERSON | 0.99+ |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.99+ |
CloudNativeCon | EVENT | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
two projects | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kelsey Hightower | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
CubeCon | EVENT | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
nine | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Ubuntu | TITLE | 0.97+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
Snick | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.95+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Tansu | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Oakton | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
thousand people | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
OpenStack | TITLE | 0.93+ |
CNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Joe beta | PERSON | 0.92+ |
Ly | PERSON | 0.92+ |
Coobernetti | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
fedora | TITLE | 0.88+ |
Virgin | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Coobernetti | PERSON | 0.83+ |
a couple of days ago | DATE | 0.83+ |
few months ago | DATE | 0.83+ |
red hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
octane | TITLE | 0.79+ |
one day | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
Kubernetes | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
Aqua | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
two later | DATE | 0.75+ |
oxen | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
a year | DATE | 0.72+ |
Snick | PERSON | 0.71+ |
NA 2019 | EVENT | 0.69+ |
Francesca Lazzeri, Microsoft | Microsoft Ignite 2019
>> Commentator: Live from Orlando, Florida It's theCUBE. Covering Microsoft Ignite. Brought to you by Cohesity. >> Hello everyone and welcome back to theCUBE's live coverage of Microsoft Ignite 2019. We are theCUBE, we are here at the Cohesity booth in the middle of the show floor at the Orange County Convention Center. 26,000 people from around the globe here. It's a very exciting show. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, along with my co-host, Stu Miniman. We are joined by Francesca Lazzeri. She is a Ph.D Machine Learning Scientist and Cloud Advocate at Microsoft. Thank you so much for coming on the show. >> Thank you for having me. I'm very excited to be here. >> Rebecca: Direct from Cambridge, so we're an all Boston table here. >> Exactly. >> I love it. I love it. >> We are in the most technology cluster, I think, in the world probably. >> So two words we're hearing a lot of here at the show, machine learning, deep learning, can you describe, define them for us here, and tell us the difference between machine learning and deep learning. >> Yeah, this is a great question and I have to say a lot of my customers ask me this question very, very often. Because I think right now there are many different terms such as deep learning as you said, machine learning, AI, that have been used more or less in the same way, but they are not really the same thing. So machine learning is portfolio, I would say, of algorithms, and when you say algorithms I mean really statistical models, that you can use to run some data analysis. So you can use these algorithms on your data, and these are going to produce what we call an output. Output are the results. So deep learning is just a type of machine learning, that has a different structure. We call it deep learning because there are many different layers, in a neural network, which is again a type of machine learning algorithm. And it's very interesting because it doesn't look at the linear relation within the different variables, but it looks at different ways to train itself, and learn something. So you have to think just about deep learning as a type of machine learning and then we have AI. AI is just on top of everything, AI is a way of building application on top of machine learning models and they run on top of machine learning algorithms. So it's a way, AI, of consuming intelligent models. >> Yeah, so Francesca, I know we're going to be talking to Jeffrey Stover tomorrow about a topic, responsible AI. Can you talk a little bit about how Microsoft is making sure that unintentional biases or challenges with data, leave the machine learning to do things, or have biases that we wouldn't want to otherwise. >> Yes, I think that Microsoft is actually investing a lot in responsible AI. Because I have to say, as a data scientist, as a machine learning scientist, I think that it's very important to understand what the model is doing and why it's give me analysis of a specific result. So, in my team, we have a tool kit, which is called, interpretability toolkit, and it's really a way to unpack machine learning models, so it's a way of opening machine learning models and understand what are the different relations between the different viables, the different data points, so it's an easy way through different type of this relation, that you can understand why your model is giving you specific results. So that you get that visibility, as a data scientist, but also as a final consumer, final users of these AI application. And I think that visibility is the most important thing to prevent unbias, sorry, bias application, and to make sure that our results are fair, for everybody. So there are some technical tools that we can use for sure. I can tell you, as a data scientist, that bias and unfairness starts with the data. You have to make sure that the data is representative enough of the population that you are targeting with your AI applications. But this sometimes is not possible. That's why it's important to create some services, some toolkits, that are going to allow you, again, as a data scientist, as a user, to understand what the AI application, or the machine learning model is doing. >> So what's the solution? If the problem, if the root of the problem is the data in the first place, how do we fix this? Because this is such an important issue in technology today. >> Yes, and so there are a few ways that you can use... So first of all I want to say that it's not a issue that you can really fix. I would say that, again, as a data scientist, there are a few things that you can do, in order to check that your AI application is doing a good job, in terms of fairness, again. And so these few steps are, as you said, the data. So most of the time, people, or customers, they just use their own data. Something that is very helpful is also looking at external type of data, and also make sure that, again, as I said, the pure data is representative enough of the entire population. So for example, if you are collecting data from a specific category of people, of a specific age, from a specific geography, you have to make sure that you understand that their results are not general results, are results that the machine learning algorithm learn from that target population. And so it's important again, to look at different type of data, different type of data sets, and use, if you can, also external data. And then, of course, this is just the first step. There's a second step, that you can always make sure that you check your model with a business expert, with data expert. So sometimes we have data scientists that work in siloes, they do not really communicate what they're doing. And I think that this is something that you need to change within your company, within your organization, you have to, always to make sure, that data scientists, machine learning scientists are working closely with data experts, business experts, and everybody's talking. Again, to make sure that we understand what we are doing. >> Okay, there were so many things announced at the show this week. In your space, what are some of the highlights of the things that people should be taking away from Microsoft Ignite. >> So I think that as your machine learning platform has been announcing a lot of updates, I love the product because I think it's a very dynamic product. There is, what we now call, the designer, which is a new version of the old Azure Machine Learning Studio. It's a drag and drop tool so it's a tool that is great for people who do not want to, code to match, or who are just getting started with machine learning. And you can really create end-to-end machine learning pipelines with these tools, in just a matter of a few minutes. The nice thing is that you can also deploy your machine learning models and this is going to create an API for you, and this API can be used by you, or by other developers in your company, to just call the model that you deployed. As I mentioned before, this is really the part where AI is arriving, and it's the part where you create application on top of your models. So this is a great announcement and we also created a algorithm cheat sheet, that is a really nice map that you can use to understand, based on your question, based on your data, what's the best machine learning algorithm, what's the best designer module that you can use to be build your end-to-end machine learning solution. So this, I would say, is my highlight. And then of course, in terms of Azure Machine Learning, there are other updates. We have the Azure Machine Learning python SDK, which is more for pro data scientists, who wants to create customized models, so models that they have to build from scratch. And for them it's very easy, because it's a python-based environment, where they can just build their models, train it, test it, deploy it. So when I say it's a very dynamic and flexible tool because it's really a tool on the pla- on the Cloud, that is targeting more business people, data analysts, but also pro data scientists and AI developers, so this is great to see and I'm very, very excited for that. >> So in addition to your work as a Cloud advocate at Microsoft, you are also a mentor to research and post-doc students at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MIT, so tell us a little more about that work in terms of what kind of mentorship do you provide and what your impressions are of this young generation, a young generation of scientists that's now coming up. >> Yes. So that's another wonderful question because one of the main goal of my team is actually working with a academic type of audience, and we started this about a year ago. So we are, again, a team of Cloud advocates, developers, data scientists, and we do not want to work only with big enterprises, but we want to work with academic type of institutions. So when I say academics, of course I mean, some of the best universities, like I've been working a lot with MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Harvard, and also now I've been working with the Columbia University, in New York. And with all of them, I work with both the PhD and post-doc students, and most of the time, what I try to help them with is changing their mindset. Because these are all brilliant students, that need just to understand how they can translate what they have learned doing their years of study, and also their technical skillset, in to the real world. And when I say the real world, I mean more like, building applications. So there is this sort of skill transfer that needs to be done and again, working with these brilliant people, I have to say, something that is easy to do, because sometimes they just need to work on a specific project that I create for them, so I give data to them and then we work together in a sort of lab environment, and we build end-to-end solutions. But from a knowledge perspective, from a, I would say, technical perspective, these are all excellent students, so it's really, I find myself in a position in which I'm mentoring them, I prepare them for their industry, because most of them, they want to become data scientist, machine learning scientist, but I have to say that I also learn a lot from them, because at the end of the day, when we build these solutions, it's really a way to build something, a project, an app together, and then we also see, the beauty of this is also that we also see how other people are using that to build something even better. So it's an amazing experience, and I feel very lucky that I'm in Cambridge, where, as you know, we have the best schools. >> Francesca, you've dug in some really interesting things, I'd love to get just a little bit, if you can share, about how machine learning is helping drive competitiveness and innovation in companies today, and any tips you have for companies, and how they can get involved even more. >> Yeah, absolutely. So I think that everything really start with the business problem because I think that, as we started this conversation, we were mentioning words such as deep learning, machine learning, AI, so it's, a lot of companies, they just want to do this because they think that they're missing something. So my first suggestion for them is really trying to understand what's the business question that they have, if there is a business problem that they can solve, if there is an operation that they can improve, so these are all interesting questions that they can ask themselves their themes. And then as soon as they have this question in mind, the second step is understand that, if they have the data, the right data, that are needed to support this process, that is going to help them with the business question. So after that, you understand that the data, I mean, if you understand, if you have the right data, they are the steppings, of course you have to understand if you have also external data, and if you have enough data, as we were saying, because this is very, very important as a first step, in your machine learning journey. And you know, it's important also, to be able to translate the business question in to a machine learning question. Like, for example, in the supervised learning, which is an area of machine learning, we have what is called the regression. Regression is a great type of model, that is great for, to answer questions such as, how many, how much? So if you are a retailer and you wanted to predict how much, how many sales of a specific product you're going to have in the next two weeks, so for example, the regression model, is going to be a good first find, first step for you to start your machine learning journey. So the translation of the business problem into a machine learning question, so it's a consequence in to a machine learning algorithm, is also very important. And then finally, I would say that you always have to make sure that you are able to deploy this machine learning model so that your environment is ready for the deployment and what we call the operizational part. Because this is really the moment in which we are going to allow the other people, meaning internal stake holders, other things in your company, to consume the machine learning model. That's the moment really in which you are going to add business value to your machine learning solution. So yeah, my suggestion for companies who want to start this journey is really to make sure that they have cleared these steps, because I think that if they have cleared these steps, then their team, their developers, their data scientists, are going to work together to build these end-to-end solutions. >> Francesca Lenzetti, thank you so much for coming on theCUBE, it was a pleasure having you. >> Thank you. Thank you. >> I'm Rebecca Knight, Stu Miniman. Stay tuned for more of theCUBE's live coverage of Microsoft Ignite. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Cohesity. in the middle of the show floor Thank you for having me. so we're an all Boston table here. I love it. We are in the most technology cluster, I think, can you describe, So you can use these algorithms on your data, leave the machine learning to do things, that you can understand why your model is giving you is the data in the first place, And I think that this is something that you need to change announced at the show this week. and it's the part where you create application So in addition to your work and most of the time, what I try to help them with I'd love to get just a little bit, if you can share, and if you have enough data, as we were saying, thank you so much for coming on theCUBE, Thank you. live coverage of Microsoft Ignite.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Francesca Lenzetti | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Francesca Lazzeri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Francesca | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Massachusetts Institute of Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey Stover | PERSON | 0.99+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
26,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cambridge | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Columbia University | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
second step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two words | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Azure Machine Learning | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Orange County Convention Center | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cohesity | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Harvard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first suggestion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
python | TITLE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
Azure Machine Learning Studio | TITLE | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
idge | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Cambr | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
Azure Machine Learning python SDK | TITLE | 0.87+ |
first place | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.87+ |
about | DATE | 0.85+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.8+ |
next two weeks | DATE | 0.79+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.68+ |
Ignite | TITLE | 0.62+ |
Ignite 2019 | TITLE | 0.46+ |
Ignite | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.44+ |
Ignite | EVENT | 0.31+ |
Around theCUBE, Unpacking AI Panel, Part 2 | CUBEConversation, October 2019
(upbeat music) >> From our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, this is a CUBE Conversation. >> Welcome everyone to this special CUBE Conversation Around the CUBE segment, Unpacking AI, number two, sponsored by Juniper Networks. We've got a great lineup here to go around the CUBE and unpack AI. We have Ken Jennings, all-time Jeopardy champion with us. Celebrity, great story there, we'll dig into that. John Hinson, director of AI at Evotek and Charna Parkey, who's the applied scientist at Textio. Thanks for joining us here for Around the CUBE Unpacking AI, appreciate it. First question I want to get to, Ken, you're notable for being beaten by a machine on Jeopardy. Everyone knows that story, but it really brings out the question of AI and the role AI is playing in society around obsolescence. We've been hearing gloom and doom around AI replacing people's jobs, and it's not really that way. What's your take on AI and replacing people's jobs? >> You know, I'm not an economist, so I can't speak to how easy it's going to be to retrain and re-skill tens of millions of people once these clerical and food prep and driving and whatever jobs go away, but I can definitely speak to the personal feeling of being in that situation, kind of watching the machine take your job on the assembly line and realizing that the thing you thought made you special no longer exists. If IBM throws enough money at it, your skill essentially is now obsolete. And it was kind of a disconcerting feeling. I think that what people need is to feel like they matter, and that went away for me very quickly when I realized that a black rectangle can now beat me at a game show. >> Okay John, what's your take on AI replacing jobs? What's your view on this? >> I think, look, we're all going to have to adapt. There's a lot of changes coming. There's changes coming socially, economically, politically. I think it's a disservice to us all to get to too indulgent around the idea that these things are going to change. We have to absorb these things, we have to be really smart about how we approach them. We have to be very open-minded about how these things are going to actually change us all. But ultimately, I think it's going to be positive at the end of the day. It's definitely going to be a little rough for a couple of years as we make all these adjustments, but I think what AI brings to the table is heads above kind of where we are today. >> Charna, your take around this, because the role of humans versus machines are pretty significant, they help each other. But is AI going to dominate over humans? >> Yeah, absolutely. I think there's a thing that we see over and over again in every bubble and collapse where, you know, in the automotive industry we certainly saw a bunch of jobs were lost, but a bunch of jobs were gained. And so we're just now actually getting into the phase where people are realizing that AI isn't just replacement, it has to be augmentation, right? We can't simply use images to replace recognition of people, we can't just use black box to give our FICO credit scores, it has to be inspectable. So there's a new field coming up now called explainable AI that actually is where we're moving towards and it's actually going to help society and create jobs. >> All right so let's stay on that next point for the next round, explainable AI. This points to a golden age. There's a debate around are we in a bubble or a golden age. A lot of people are negative right now on tech. You can see all the tech backlash. Amazon, the big tech companies like Apple and Facebook, there's a huge backlash around this so-called tech for society. Is this an indicator of a golden age coming? >> I think so, absolutely. We can take two examples of this. One would be where, you remember when Amazon built a hiring algorithm based upon their own resume data and they found that it was discriminating against women because they had only had men apply for it. Now with Textio we're building augmented writing across the audience and not from a single company and so companies like Johnson and Johnson are increasing the pipeline by more than nine percent which converts to 90,000 more women applying for their jobs. And so part of the difference there is one is explainable, one isn't, and one is using the right data set representing the audience that is consuming it and not a single company's hiring. So I think we're absolutely headed into more of a golden age, and I think these are some of the signs that people are starting to use it in the right way. >> John, what's your take? Obviously golden age doesn't look that to us right now. You see Facebook approving lies as ads, Twitter banning political ads. AI was supposed to solve all these problems. Is there light at the end of this dark tunnel we're on? >> Yeah, golden age for sure. I'm definitely a big believer in that. I think there's a new era amongst us on how we handle data in general. I think the most important thing we have here though is education around what this stuff is, how it works, how it's affecting our lives individually and at the corporate level. This is a new era of informing and augmenting literally everything we do. I see nothing but positives coming out of this. We have to be obviously very careful with our approaching all the biases that already exist today that are only going to be magnified with these types of algorithms at mass scale. But ultimately if we can get over that hurdle, which I believe collectively we all need to do together, I think we'd live in much better, less wasteful world just by approaching the data that's already at hand. >> Ken, what's your take on this? It's like a daily double question. Is it going to be a golden age? >> Laughs >> It's going to come sooner or later. We have to have catastrophe before, we have to have reality hit us in the face before we realize that tech is good, and shaping it? It's pretty ugly right now in some of the situations out there, especially in the political scene with the election in the US. You're seeing some negative things happening. What's your take on this? >> I'm much more skeptical than John and Charna. I feel like that kind of just blinkered, it's going to be great, is something you have to actually be in the tech industry and hearing all day to actually believe. I remember seeing kind of lay-person's exposure to Watson when Watson was on Jeopardy and hearing the questions reporters would ask and seeing the memes that would appear, and everyone's immediate reaction just to something as innocuous as a AI algorithm playing on a game show was to ask, is this Skynet from Terminator 2? Is this the computer from The Matrix? Is this HAL pushing us out of the airlock? Everybody immediately first goes to the tech is going to kill us. That's like everybody's first reaction, and it's weird. I don't know, you might say it's just because Hollywood has trained us to expect that plot development, but I almost think it's the other way around. Like that's a story we tell because we're deeply worried about our own meaning and obsolescence when we see how little these skills might be valued in 10, 20, 30 years. >> I can't tell you how much, by the way, Star Trek, Star Wars and Terminators probably affected the nomenclature of the technology. Everyone references Skynet. Oh my God, we're going to be taken over and killed by aliens and machines. This is a real fear. I thinks it's an initial reaction. You felt that Ken, so I've got to ask you, where do you think the crossover point is for people to internalize the benefits of say, AI for instance? Because people will say hey, look back at life before the iPhone, look at life before these tools were out there. Some will say society's gotten better, but yet there's this surveillance culture, things... And on and on. So what do you guys think the crossover point is for the reaction to change from oh my God, it's Skynet, gloom and doom to this actually could be good? >> It's incredibly tricky because as we've seen, the perception of AI both in and out of the industry changes as AI advances. As soon as machine learning can actually do a task, there's a tendency to say there's this no true Scotsman problem where we say well, that clearly can't be AI because I see how the trick worked. And yeah, humans lose at chess now. So when these small advances happen, the reaction is often oh, that's not really AI. And by the same token, it's not a game-changer when your email client can start to auto-complete your emails. That's a minor convenience to you. But you don't think oh, maybe Skynet is good. I really do think it's going to have to be, maybe the inflection point is when it starts to become so disruptive that actually public policy has to change. So we get serious about >> And public policy has started changing. >> whatever their reactions are. >> Charna, your thoughts. >> The public policy has started changing though. We just saw, I think it was in September, where California banned the use of AI in the body cameras, both real-time and after the fact. So I think that's part of the pivot point that we're actually seeing is that public policy is changing.` The state of Washington currently has a task force for AI who's making a set of recommendations for policy starting in December. But I think part of what we're missing is that we don't have enough digital natives in office to even attempt to, to your point Ken, predict what we're even going to be able to do with it, right? There is this fear because of misunderstanding, but we also don't have a respect of our political climate right now by a lot of our digital natives, and they need to be there to be making this policy. >> John, weigh in on this because you're director of AI, you're seeing positive, you have to deal with the uncertainty as well, the growth of machine learning. And just this week Google announced more TensorFlow for everybody. You're seeing Open Source. So there's a tech push, almost a democratization, going on with AI. So I think this crossover point might be sooner in front of us than people think. What's your thoughts? >> Yeah it's here right now. All these things can be essentially put into an environment. You can see these into products, or making business decisions or political decisions. These are all available right now. They're available today and its within 10 to 15 lines of code. It's all about the data sets, so you have to be really good stewards of the data that you're using to train your models. But I think the most important thing, back to the Skynet and all this science-fiction side, we have to collectively start telling the right stories. We need better stories than just this robots are going to take us over and destroy all of our jobs. I think more interesting stories really revolve around, what about public defenders who can have this informant augmentation algorithm that's going to help them get their job done? What about tailor-made medicine that's going to tell me exactly what the conditions are based off of a particular treatment plan instead of guessing? What about tailored education that's going to look at all of my strengths and weaknesses and present a plan for me? These are things that AI can do. Charna's exactly right, where if we don't get this into the right political atmosphere that's helping balance the capitalist side with the social side, we're going to be in trouble. So that's got to be embedded in every layer of enterprise as well as society in general. It's here, it's now, and it's real. >> Ken, before we move on to the ethics question, I want to get your thoughts on this because we have an Alexa at home. We had an Alexa at home; my wife made me get rid of it. We had an Apple device, what they're called... the Home pods, that's gone. I bought a Portal from Facebook because I always buy the earliest stuff, that's gone. We don't want listening devices in our house because in order to get that AI, you have to give up listening, and this has been an issue. What do you have to give to get? This has been a big question. What's your thoughts on all this? >> I was at an Amazon event where they were trumpeting how no technology had ever caught on faster than these personal digital assistants, and yet every time I'm in a use case, a household that's trying to use them, something goes terribly wrong. My friend had to rename his because the neighbor kids kept telling Alexa to do awful things. He renamed it computer, and now every time we use the word computer, the wall tells us something we don't want to know. >> (laughs) >> This is just anecdata, but maybe it speaks to something deeper, the fact that we don't necessarily like the feeling of being surveilled. IBM was always trying to push Watson as the star Trek computer that helpfully tells you exactly what you need to know in the right moment, but that's got downsides too. I feel like we're going to, if nothing else, we may start to value individual learning and knowledge less when we feel like a voice from the ceiling can deliver unto us the fact that we need. I think decision-making might suffer in that kind of a world. >> All right, this brings up ethics because I bring up the Amazon and the voice stuff because this is the new interface people want to have with machines. I didn't mention phones, Androids and Apple, they need to listen in order to make decisions. This brings up the ethics question around who sets the laws, what society should do about this, because we want the benefits of AI. John, you point out some of them. You got to give to get. Where are we on ethics? What's the opinion, what's the current view on this? John, we'll start with you on your ethics view on what needs to change now to move the ball faster. >> Data is gold. Data is gold at an exponential rate when you're talking about AI. There should be no situation where these companies get to collect data at no cost or no benefit to the end consumer. So ultimately we should have the option to opt out of any of these products and any of this type of surveillance wherever we can. Public safety is a little bit different situation, but on the commercial side, there is a lot of more expensive and even more difficult ways to train these models with a data set that isn't just basically grabbing everything our of your personal lives. I think that should be an option for consumers and that's one of those ethical check-marks. Again, ethics in general, the way that data's trained, the way that data's handled, the way models actually work, it has to be a primary reason for and approach of how you actually go about developing and delivering AI. That said, we cannot get over-indulgent in the fact that we can't do it because we're so fearful of the ethical outcomes. We have to find some middle ground and we have to find it quickly and collectively. >> Charna, what's your take on this? Ethics is super important to set the agenda for society to take advantage of all this. >> Yeah. I think we've got three ethical components here. We certainly have, as John mentioned, the data sets. However, it's also what behavior we're trying to change. So I believe the industry could benefit from a lot more behavioral science, so that we can understand whether or not the algorithms that we're building are changing behaviors that we actually want to change, right? And if we aren't, that's unethical. There is an entire field of ethics that needs to start getting put into our companies. We need an ethics board internally. A few companies are doing this already actually. I know a lot of the military companies do. I used to be in the defense industry, and so they've got a board of ethics before you can do things. The challenge is also though that as we're democratizing the algorithms themselves, people don't understand that you can't just get a set of data that represents the population. So this is true of image processing, where if we only used 100 images of a black woman, and we used 1,000 images of a white man because that was the distribution in our population, and then the algorithm could not detect the difference between skin tones for people of color, then we end up with situations where we end up in a police state where you put in an image of one black woman and it looks like ten of them and you can't distinguish between them. And yet, the confidence rate for the humans are actually higher, because they now have a machine backing their decision. And so they stop questioning, to your point, Ken, about what is the decision I'm making, they're like I'm so confident, this data told me so. And so there's a little bit of you need some expert in the loop and you also can't just have experts, because then you end up with Cambridge Analytica and all of the political things that happened there, not just in the US, but across 200 different elections and 30 different countries. And we are upset because it happened in the US, but this has been happening for years. So its just this ethical challenge of behavior change. It's not even AI and we do it all the time. Its why the cigarette industry is regulated (laughs). >> So Ken, what's your take on this? Obviously because society needs to have ethics. Who runs that? Companies? The law-makers? Someone's got to be responsible. >> I'm honestly a little pessimistic the general public will even demand this the way we're maybe hoping that they will. When I think about an example like Facebook, people just being able to, being willing to give away insane amounts of data through social media companies for the smallest of benefits: keeping in touch with people from high school they don't like. I mean, it really shows how little we value not being a product in this kind of situation. But I would like to see this kind of ethical decisions being made at the company-level. I feel like Google kind of surreptitiously moved away from it's little don't be evil mantra with the subtext that eh, maybe we'll be a little evil now. It just reminds me of Manhattan Project era thinking, where you could've gone to any of these nuclear scientists and said you're working on a real interesting puzzle here, it might advance the field, but like 200,000 civilians might die this summer. And I feel like they would've just looked at you and thought that's not really my bailiwick. I'm just trying to solve the fission problem. I would like to see these 10 companies actually having that kind of thinking internally. Not being so busy thinking if they can do something that they don't wonder if they should. >> That's a great point. This brings up the point of who is responsible. Almost as if who is less evil than the other person? Google, they don't do evil, but they're less evil than Amazon and Facebook and others. Who is responsible? The companies or the law-makers? Because if you look up some of the hearings in Washington, D.C., some of the law-makers we see up there, they don't know how the internet works, and it's pretty obvious that this is a problem. >> Yeah, well that's why Jack Dorsey of Twitter posted yesterday that he banned not just political ads, but also issue ads. This isn't something that they're making him do, but he understands that when you're using AI to target people, that it's not okay. At some point, while Mark is sitting on (laughs) this committee and giving his testimony, he's essentially asking to be regulated because he can't regulate himself. He's like well, everyone's doing it, so I'm going to do it too. That's not an okay excuse. We see this in the labor market though actually, where there's existing laws that prevent discrimination. It's actually the company's responsibility to make sure that the products that they purchase from any vendor isn't introducing discrimination into that process. So its not even the vendor that's held responsible, it's the company and their use of it. We saw in the NYPD actually that one of those image recognition systems came up and someone said well, he looked like, I forget the name of what the actor was, but some actor's name is what the perpetrator looked like and so they used an image of the actor to try and find the person who actually assaulted someone else. And that's, it's also the user problem that I'm super concerned about. >> So John, what's your take on this? Because these are companies are in business to make money, for profit, they're not the government. And who's the role, what should the government do? AI has to move forward. >> Yeah, we're all responsible. The companies are responsible. The companies that we work with, I have yet to interact with customers, or with our customers here, that have some insidious goal, that they're trying to outsmart their customers. They're not. Everyone's looking to do the best and deliver the most relevant products in the marketplace. The government, they absolutely... The political structure we have, it has to be really intelligent and it's got to get up-skilled in this space and it needs to do it quickly, both at the economy level, as well as for our defense. But the individuals, all of us as individuals, we are already subjected to this type of artificial intelligence in our everyday lives. Look at streaming, streaming media. Right now every single one of us goes out through a streaming source, and we're getting recommendations on what we should watch next. And we're already adapting to these things, I am. I'm like stop showing me all the stuff you know I want to watch, that's not interesting to me. I want to find something I don't know I want to watch, right? So we all have to get educated, we're all responsible for these things. And again, I see a much more positive side of this. I'm not trying to get into the fear-mongering side of all the things that could go wrong, I want to focus on the good stories, the positive stories. If I'm in a courtroom and I lose a court case because I couldn't afford the best attorney and I have the bias of a judge, I would certainly like artificial intelligence to make a determination that allows me to drive an appeal, as one example. Things like that are really creative in the world that we need to do. Tampering down this wild speculation we have on the markets. I mean, we are all victims of really bad data decisions right now, almost the worst data decisions. For me, I see this as a way to actually improve all those things. Fraud fees will be reduced. That helps everybody, right? Less speculation and these wild swings, these are all helpful things. >> Well Ken, John and Charna, thank- (audio feedback) >> Go ahead, finish. Get that word in. >> Sorry. I think that point you were making though John, is we are still a capitalist society, but we're no longer a shareholder capitalist society, we are a stakeholder capitalist society and the stakeholder is the society itself. It is us, it what we want to see. And so yes, I still want money. Obviously there are things that I want to buy, but I also care about well-being. I think it's that little shift that we're seeing that is actually you and I holding our own teams accountable for what they do. >> Yeah, culture first is a whole new shift going on in these companies that's a for-profit, mission-based. Ken, John, Charna, thanks for coming on Around the CUBE, Unpacking AI. Let's go around the CUBE Ken, John and Charna in that order, and just real quickly, unpacking AI, what's your final word? >> (laughs) I really... I'm interested in John's take that there's a democratization coming provided these tools will be available to everyone. I would certainly love to believe that. It seems like in the past, we've seen no, that access to these kind of powerful, paradigm-changing tools tend to be concentrated among a very small group of people and the benefits accrue to a very small group of people. But I hope that doesn't happen here. You know, I'm optimistic as well. I like the utopian side where we all have this amazing access to information and so many new problems can get solved with amazing amounts of data that we never could've touched before. Though you know, I think about that. I try to let that help me sleep at night, and not the fact that, you know... every public figure I see on TV is kind of out of touch about technology and only one candidate suggests the universal basic income, and it's kind of a crackpot idea. Those are the kind of things that keep me up at night. >> All right, John, final word. >> I think it's beautiful, AI's beautiful. We're on the cusp of a whole new world, it's nothing but positivity I see. We have to be careful. We're all nervous about it. None of us know how to approach these things, but as human beings, we've been here before. We're here all the time. And I believe that we can all collectively get a better lives for ourselves, for the environment, for everything that's out there. It's here, it's now, it's definitely real. I encourage everyone to hurry up on their own education. Every company, every layer of government to start really embracing these things and start paying attention. It's catching us all a little bit by surprise, but once you see it in production, you see it real, you'll be impressed. >> Okay, Charna, final word. >> I think one thing I want to leave people with is what we incentivize is what we end up optimizing for. This is the same for human behavior. You're training a new employee, you put incentives on the way that they sell, and that's, they game the system. AI's specifically find the optimum route, that is their job. So if we don't understand more complex cost functions, more complex representative ways of training, we're going to end up in a space, before we know it, that we can't get out of. And especially if we're using uninspectable AI. We really need to move towards augmentation. There are some companies that are implementing this now that you may not even know. Zillow, for example, is using AI to give you a cost for your home just by the photos and the words that you describe it, but they're also purchasing houses without a human in the loop in certain markets, based upon an inspection later by a human. And so there are these big bets that we're making within these massive corporations, but if you're going to do it as an individual, take a Coursera class on AI and take a Coursera class on ethics so that you can understand what the pitfalls are going to be, because that cost function is incredibly important. >> Okay, that's a wrap. Looks like we have a winner here. Charna, you got 18, John 16. Ken came in with 12, beaten again! (both laugh) Okay, Ken, seriously, great to have you guys on, a pleasure to meet everyone. Thanks for sharing on Around the CUBE Unpacking AI, panel number two. Thank you. >> Thanks a lot. >> Thank you. >> Thanks. I've been defeated by artificial intelligence again! (all laugh) (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
in the heart of Silicon Valley, and the role AI is playing in society around obsolescence. and realizing that the thing you thought made you special I think it's going to be positive But is AI going to dominate over humans? in the automotive industry we certainly saw You can see all the tech backlash. that people are starting to use it in the right way. Obviously golden age doesn't look that to us right now. that are only going to be magnified Is it going to be a golden age? We have to have catastrophe before, the tech is going to kill us. for the reaction to change from I really do think it's going to have to be, And public policy their reactions are. and they need to be there to be making this policy. the growth of machine learning. So that's got to be embedded in every layer of because in order to get that AI, the wall tells us something we don't want to know. the fact that we don't necessarily like the feeling they need to listen in order to make decisions. that we can't do it because we're so fearful Ethics is super important to set the agenda for society There is an entire field of ethics that needs to start Obviously because society needs to have ethics. And I feel like they would've just looked at you in Washington, D.C., some of the law-makers we see up there, I forget the name of what the actor was, Because these are companies are in business to make money, and I have the bias of a judge, Get that word in. and the stakeholder is the society itself. Ken, John and Charna in that order, and the benefits accrue to a very small group of people. And I believe that we can all collectively and the words that you describe it, Okay, Ken, seriously, great to have you guys on, (upbeat music)
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jack Dorsey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ken Jennings | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Hinson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ken | PERSON | 0.99+ |
December | DATE | 0.99+ |
Charna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
October 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
Evotek | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100 images | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1,000 images | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Washington, D.C. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
more than nine percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
200,000 civilians | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Star Trek | TITLE | 0.99+ |
10 companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Terminator 2 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Juniper Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 different countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Textio | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
NYPD | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
The Matrix | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Hollywood | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Watson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Star Wars | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Washington | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
200 different elections | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
FICO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15 lines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Johnson and Johnson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Skynet | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
18 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first reaction | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |