Image Title

Search Results for Midwest:

Don DeLoach, Midwest IoT Council | PentahoWorld 2017


 

>> Announcer: Live, from Orlando, Florida, it's TheCUBE, covering PentahoWorld 2017. Brought to you by Hitachi Vantara. >> Welcome back to sunny Orlando everybody. This is TheCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. My name is Dave Vellante and this is PentahoWorld, #PWorld17. Don DeLoach here, he's the co-chair of the midwest IoT council. Thanks so much for coming on TheCUBE. >> Good to be here. >> So you've just written a new book. I got it right in my hot off the presses in my hands. The Future of IoT, leveraging the shift to a data-centric world. Can you see that okay? Alright, great, how's that, you got that? Well congratulations on getting the book done. >> Thanks. >> It's like, the closest a male can come to having a baby, I guess. But, so, it's fantastic. Let's start with sort of the premise of the book. What, why'd you write it? >> Sure, I'll give you the short version, 'cause that in and of itself could go on forever. I'm a data guy by background. And for the last five or six years, I've really been passionate about IoT. And the two converged with a focus on data, but it was kind of ahead of where most people in IoT were, because they were mostly focused on sensor technology and communications, and to a limited extent, the workflow. So I kind of developed this thesis around where I thought the market was going to go. And I would have this conversation over and over and over, but it wasn't really sticking and so I decided maybe I should write a book to talk about it and it took me forever to write the book 'cause fundamentally I didn't know what I was doing. Fortunately, I was able to eventually bring on a couple of co-authors and collectively we were able to get the book written and we published it in May of this year. >> And give us the premise, how would you summarize? >> So the central thesis of the book is that the market is going to shift from a focus on IoT enabled products like a smart refrigerator or a low-fat fryer or a turbine in a factory or a power plant or whatever. It's going to shift from the IoT enabled products to the IoT enabled enterprise. If you look at the Harvard Business Review article that Jim Heppelmann and Michael Porter did in 2014, they talked about the progression from products to smart products to smart, connected products, to product systems, to system of systems. We've largely been focused on smart, connected products, or as I would call IoT enabled products. And most of the technology vendors have focused their efforts on helping the lighting vendor or the refrigerator vendor or whatever IoT enable their product. But when that moves to mass adoption of IoT, if you're the CIO or the CEO of SeaLand or Disney or Walmart or whatever, you're not going to want to be a company that has 100,000 IoT enabled products. You're going to want to be an IoT enabled company. And the difference is really all around data primacy and how that data is treated. So, right now, most of the data goes from the IoT enabled product to the product provider. And they tell you what data you can get. But that, if you look at the progression, it's almost mathematically impossible that that is sustainable because company, organizations are going to want to take my, like let's just say we're talking about a fast food restaurant. They're going to want to take the data from the low-fat fryer and the data from the refrigerator or the shake machine or the lighting system or whatever, and they're going to want to look at it in the context of the other data. And they're going to also want to combine it with their point-of-sale or crew scheduling, or inventory and then if they're smart, they'll start to even pull in external data, like pedestrian traffic or street traffic or microweather or whatever, and they'll create a much richer signature. And then, it comes down to governance, where I want to create this enriched data set, and then propagate it to the right constituent in the right time in the right way. So you still give the product provider back the data that they want, and there's nothing that precludes you from doing that. And you give the low-fat fryer provider the data that they want, but you give your regional and corporate offices a different view of the same data, and you give the FDA or your supply chain partner, it's still the same atomic data, but what you're doing is you're separating the creation of the data from the consumption of the data, and that's where you gain maximum leverage, and that's really the thesis of the book. >> It's data, great summary by the way, so it's data in context, and the context of the low-fat fryer is going to be different than the workflow within that retail operation. >> Yeah, that's right and again, this is where, the product providers have initially kind of pushed back because they feel like they have stickiness and loyalty that's bred out of that link. But, first of all, that's going to change. So if you're Walmart or a major concern and you say, "I'm going to do a lighting RFP," and there's 10 vendors that say, "Hey, we want to compete for this," and six of 'em will allow Walmart to control the data, and four say, "No, we have to control the data," their list just went to six. They're just not going to put up with that. >> Dave: Period, the end, absolutely. >> That's right. So if the product providers are smart, they're going to get ahead of this and say, "Look, I get where the market's going. "We're going to need to give you control of the data, "but I'm going to ask for a contract that says "I'm going to get the data I'm already getting, "'cause I need to get that, and you want me to get that. "But number two, I'm going to recognize that "they can give, Walmart can give me my data back, "but enrich it and contextualize it "so I get better data back." So everybody can win, but it's all about the right architecture. >> Well and the product guys going to have the Trojan horse strategy of getting in when nobody was really looking. >> Don: That's right. >> And okay, so they've got there. Do you envision, Don, a point at which the Walmart might say, "No, that's our data "and you don't get it." >> Um, not really- >> or is there going to be a quid pro quo? >> and here's why. The argument that the product providers have made all along is, almost in a condescending way sometimes, although not intentionally condescending, it's been, look, we're selling you this low-fat fryer for your fast food restaurant. And you say you want the data, but you know, we had a team of people who are experts in this. Leave that to us, we'll analyze the data and we'll give you back what you need. Now, there's some truth to the fact that they should know their products better than anybody, and if I'm the fast food chain, I want them to get that data so that they can continually analyze and help me do my job better. They just don't have to get that data at my expense. There are ways to cooperatively work this, but again, it comes back to just the right architecture. So what we call the first receiver is in essence, setting up an abstraction close to the point of the ingestion of all this data. Upon which it's cleansed, enriched, and then propagated again to the right constituent in the right time in the right way. And by the way, I would add, with the right security considerations, and with the right data privacy considerations, 'cause like, if you look around the market now, things like GEP are in Europe and what we've seen in the US just in the wake of the elections and everything around how data is treated, privacy concerns are going to be huge. So if you don't know how to treat the data in the context of how it needs to be leveraged, you're going to lose that leverage of the data. >> Well, plus the widget guys are going to say "Look, we have to do predictive maintenance "on those devices and you want us to do that." You know, they say follow the money. Let's follow the data. So, what's the data flow look like in your mind? You got these edge devices. >> Yep, physical or virtual. Doesn't have to be a physical edge. Although, in a lot of cases, there are good reasons why you'd want a physical edge, but there's nothing technologically that says you have to have a physical edge. >> Elaborate on that, would you? What do you mean by virtual? >> Sure, so let's say I have a server inside a retail outfit. And it's collecting all of my IoT data and consolidating it and persisting it into a data store and then propagating it to a variety of constituents. That would be creating the first receiver in the physical edge. There's nothing that says that that edge device can't grab that data, but then persist it in a distributed Amazon cloud instance, or a Rackspace instance or whatever. It doesn't actually need to be persisted physically on the edge, but there's no reason it can't either. >> Okay, now I understand that now. So the guys at Wikibon, which is a sort of sister company to TheCUBE, have envisioned this three tiered data model where you've got the devices at the edge where real-time activity's going on, real-time analytics, and then you've got this sort of aggregation point, I guess call it a gateway. And then you've got, and that's as I say, aggregation of all these edge devices. And then you've got the cloud where the heavy modeling is done. It could be your private cloud or your public cloud. So does that three tier model make sense to you? >> Yeah, so what you're describing as the first tier is actually the sensor layer. The gateway layer that you're describing, in the book would be characterized as the first receiver. It's basically an edge tier that is augmented to persist and enrich the data and then apply the proper governance to it. But what I would argue is, in reality, I mean, your reference architecture is spot-on. But if you actually take that one step further, it's actually an n-tier architecture. Because there's no reason why the data doesn't go from the ten franchise stores, to the regional headquarters, to the country headquarters, to the corporate headquarters, and every step along the way, including the edge, you're going to see certain types of analytics and computational work done. I'll put a plug for my friends at Hitachi Lumada in on this, you know, there's like 700 horizontal IoT platforms out there. There aren't going to be 700 winners. There's going to be probably eight to 10, and that's only because the different specific verticals will provide for more winners than it would be if it was just one like a search engine. But, the winners are going to have to have an extensible architecture that is, will ultimately allow enterprises to do the very things I'm talking about doing. And so there are a number out there, but one of the things, and Rob Tiffany, who's the CTO of Lumada, I think has a really good handle on his team on an architecture that is really plausible for accomplishing this as the market migrates into the future. >> And that architecture's got to be very flexible, not just elastic, but sometimes we use the word plastic, plasticity, being able to go in any direction. >> Well, sure, up to and including the use of digital twins and avatars and the logic that goes along with that and the ability to spin something up and spin something down gives you that flexibility that you as an enterprise, especially the larger the enterprise, the more important that becomes, need. >> How much of the data, Don, at that edge do you think will be persisted, two part question? It's not all going to be persisted, is it? Isn't that too expensive? Is it necessary to persist all of that data? >> Well, no. So this is where, you'll hear the notion of data exhaust. What that really means is, let's just say I'm instrumenting every room in this hotel and each room has six different sensors in it and I'm taking a reading once a second. The ratio of inconsequential to consequential data is probably going to be over 99 to one. So it doesn't really make sense to persist that data and it sure as hell doesn't make sense to take that data and push it into a cloud where I spend more to reduce the value of the payload. That's just dumb. But what will happen is that, there are two things, one, I think people will see the value in locally persisting the data that has value, the consequential data, and doing that in a way that's stored at least for some period of time so you can run the type of edge analytics that might benefit from having that persisted store. The other thing that I think will happen, and this is, I don't talk much, I talk a little bit about it in the book, but there's this whole notion where when we get to the volumes of data that we really talk about where IoT will go by like 2025, it's going to push the physical limitations of how we can accommodate that. So people will begin to use techniques like developing statistical metadata models that are a highly accurate metadata representation of the entirety of the data set, but probably in about one percent of the space that's queryable and suitable for machine learning where it's going to enable you to do what you just physically couldn't do before. So that's a little bit into the future, but there are people doing some fabulous work on that right now and that'll creep into the overall lexicon over time. >> Is that a lightweight digital twin that gives you substantially the same insight? >> It could augment the digital twin in ways that allow you to stand up digital twins where you might not be able to before. The thing that, the example that most people would know about are, like in the Apache ecosystem, there are toolsets like SnappyData that are basically doing approximation, but they're doing it via sampling. And that is a step in that direction, but what you're looking for is very high value approximation that doesn't lose the outlier. So like in IoT, one of the things you normally are looking for is where am I going to pick up on anomalous behavior? Well if I'm using a sample set, and I'm only taking 15%, I by definition am going to lose a lot of that anomalous behavior. So it has to be a holistic representation of the data, but what happens is that that data is transformed into statistics that can be queryable as if it was the atomic data set, but what you're getting is a very high value approximation in a fraction of the space and time and resources. >> Ok, but that's not sampling. >> No, it's statistical metadata. There are, there's a, my last company had developed a thing that we called approximate query, and it was based on that exact set of patents around the formation of a statistical metadata model. It just so happens it's absolutely suited for where IoT is going. It's kind of, IoT isn't really there yet. People are still trying to figure out the edge in its most basic forms, but the sheer weight of the data and the progression of the market is going to force people to be innovative in how they look at some of these things. Just like, if you look at things like privacy, right now, people think in terms of anonymization. And that's, basically, I'm going to de-link data contextually where I'm going to effectively lose the linkages to the context in order to conform with data privacy. But there are techniques, like if you look at GDCAR, their techniques, within certain safe harbors, that allow you to pseudonymize the data where you can actually relink it under certain conditions. And there are some smart people out there solving these problems. That's where the market's going to go, it's just going to get there over time. And what I would also add to this equation is, at the end of the day, right now, the concepts that are in the book about the first receiver and the create, the abstraction of the creation of the data from the consumption of the data, look, it's a pretty basic thing, but it's the type of shift that is going to be required for enterprises to truly leverage the data. The things about statistical metadata and pseudonymization, pseudonymization will come before the statistical metadata. But the market forces are going to drive more and more into those areas, but you got to walk before you run. Right now, most people still have silos, which is interesting, because when you think about the whole notion of the internet of things, it infers that it's this exploitation of understanding the state of physical assets in a very broad based environment. And yet, the funny thing is, most IoT devices are silos that emulate M2M, sort of peer to peer networks just using the internet as a communication vehicle. But that'll change. >> Right, and that's really again, back to the premise of the book. We're going from these individual products, where all the data is locked into the product silo, to this digital fabric, that is an enterprise context, not a product context. >> That's right and if you go to the toolsets that Pentaho offers, the analytic toolsets. Let's just say, now that I've got this rich data set, assuming I'm following basic architectural principles so that I can leverage the maximum amount of data, that now gives me the ability to use these type of toolsets to do far better operational analytics to know what's going on, far better forensic analysis and investigative analytics to mine through the date and do root cause analysis, far better predictive analytics and prescriptive analytics to figure out what will go on, and ultimately feed the machine learning algorithms ultimately to get to in essence, the living organism, the adaptive systems that are continuously changing and adapting to circumstances. That's kind of the Holy Grail. >> You mentioned Hitachi Vantara before. I'm curious what your thoughts are on the Hitachi, you know, two years ago, we saw the acquisition, said, okay, now what? And you know, on paper it sounded good, and now it starts to come together, it starts to make more sense. You know, storage is going to the cloud. HDS says, alright, well we got this Hitachi relationship. But what do you make of that? How do you assess it, and where do you see it going? >> First of all, I actually think the moves that they've done are good. And I would not say that if I didn't think it. I'd just find a politically correct way not to say that. But I do think it's good. So they created the Hitachi Insight Group about a year and a half ago, and now that's been folded into Hitachin Vantara, alongside HDS and Pentaho and I think that it's a fairly logical set of elements coming together. I think they're going down the right path. In full disclosure, I worked for Hitachi Data Systems from '91 til '94, so it's not like I'm a recent employee of them, it's 25 years ago, but my experience with Hitachi corporate and the way they approach things has been unlike a lot of really super large companies, who may be super large, but may not be the best engineers, or may not always get everything done so well, Hitachi's a really formidable organization. And I think what they're doing with Pentaho and HDS and the Insight Group and specifically Lumada, is well thought out and I'm optimistic about where they're going. And by the way, they won't be the only winner in the equation. There's going to be eight or nine different key players, but they'll, I would not short them whatsoever. I have high hopes for them. >> The TAM is enormous. Normally, Hitachi eventually gets to where it wants to go. It's a very thoughtful company. I've been watching them for 30 years. But to a lot of people, the Pentaho and the Insight's play make a lot of sense, and then HDS, you used to work for HDS, lot of infrastructure still, lot of hardware, but a relationship with Hitachi Limited, that is quite strong, where do you see that fit, that third piece of the stool? >> So, this is where there's a few companies that have unique advantages, with Hitachi being one of them. Because if you think about IoT, IoT is the intersection of information technology and operational technology. So it's one thing to say, "I know how to build a database." or "I can build machine learning algorithms," or whatever. It's another thing to say, "I know how to build trains "or CAT scans or smart city lighting systems." And the domain expertise married with the technology delivers a set of capabilities that you can't match without that domain expertise. And, I mean, if you even just reduce it down to artificial intelligence and machine learning, you get an expert ML or AI guy, and they're only as good as the limits of their domain expertise. So that's why, and again, that's why I go back to the comparison to search engines, where there's going to be like, there's Google and maybe Yahoo. There's probably going to be more platform winners because the vertical expertise is going to be very, very important, but there's not going to be 700 of 'em. But Hitachi has an advantage that they bring to the table, 'cause they have very deep roots in energy, in medical equipment, in transportation. All of that will manifest itself in what they're doing in a big way, I think. >> Okay, so, but a lot of the things that you described, and help me understand this, are Hitachi Limited. Now of course, Hitachi Data Systems started as, National Advance Systems was a distribution arm for Hitachi IT products. >> Don: Right, good for you, not many people remember. >> I'm old. So, like I said, I had a 30 year history with this company. Do you foresee that that, and by the way, interestingly, was often criticized back when you were working for HDS, it was like, it's still a distribution hub, but in the last decade, HDS has become much more of a contributor to the innovation and the product strategy and so forth. Having said that, it seems to me advantageous if some of those things you discussed, the trains, the medical equipment, can start flowing back through HDS. I'm not sure if that's explicitly the plan. I didn't necessarily hear that, but it sort of has to, right? >> Well, I'm not privy to those discussions, so it would be conjecture on my part. >> Let's opine, but right, doesn't that make sense? >> Don: It makes perfect sense. >> Because, I mean HDS for years was just this storage silo. And then storage became a very uninteresting business, and credit to Hitachi for pivoting. But it seems to me that they could really, and they probably have a, I had Brian Householder on earlier I wish I had explored this more with him. But it just seems, the question for them is, okay, how are you going to tap those really diverse businesses. I mean, it's a business like a GE or a Siemens. I mean, it's very broad based. >> Well, again, conjecture on my part, but one way I would do it would be to start using Lumada in the various operations, the domain-specific operations right now with Hitachi. Whether they plan to do that or not, I'm not sure of. I've heard that they probably will. >> That's a data play, obviously, right? >> Well it's a platform play. And it's enabling technology that should augment what's already going on in the various elements of Hitachi. Again, I'm, this is conjecture on my part. But you asked, let's just go with this. I would say that makes a lot of sense. I'd be surprised if they don't do that. And I think in the process of doing that, you start to crosspollinate that expertise that gives you a unique advantage. It goes back to if you have unique advantages, you can choose to exploit them or not. Very few companies have the set of unique advantages that somebody like Hitachi has in terms of their engineering and massive reach into so many, you know, Hitachi, GE, Siemens, these are companies that have big reach to the extent that they exploit them or not. One of the things about Hitachi that's different than almost anybody though is they have all this domain expertise, but they've been in the technology-specific business for a long time as well, making computers. And so, they actually already have the internal expertise to crosspollinate, but you know, whether they do it or not, time will tell. >> Well, but it's interesting to watch the big whales, the horses in the track, if you will. Certainly GE has made a lot of noise, like, okay, we're a software company. And now you're seeing, wow, that's not so easy, and then again, I'm sanguine about GE. I think eventually they'll get there. And then you see IBM's got their sort of IoT division. They're bringing in people. Another company with a lot of IT expertise. Not a lot of OT expertise. And then you see Hitachi, who's actually got both. Siemens I don't know as well, but presumably, they're more OT than IT and so you would think that if you had to evaluate the companies' positions, that Hitachi's in a unique position. Certainly have a lot of software. We'll see if they can leverage that in the data play, obviously Pentaho is a key piece of that. >> One would assume, yeah for sure. No, I mean, I again, I think, I'm very optimistic about their future. I think very highly of the people I know inside that I think are playing a role here. You know, it's not like there aren't people at GE that I think highly of, but listen, you know, San Ramon was something that was spun up recently. Hitachi's been doing this for years and years and years. You know, so different players have different capabilities, but Hitachi seems to have sort of a holistic set of capabilities that they can bring together and to date, I've been very impressed with how they've been going about it. And especially with the architecture that they're bringing to bear with Lumada. >> Okay, the book is The Future of IoT, leveraging the shift to a data-centric world. Don DeLoach, and you had a co-author here as well. >> I had two co-authors. One is Wael Elrifai from Pentaho, Hitachi Vantara and the other is Emil Berthelsen, a Gartner analyst who was with Machina Research and then Gartner acquired them and Emil has stayed on with them. Both of them great guys and we wouldn't have this book if it weren't for the three of us together. I never would have pulled this off on my own, so it's a collective work. >> Don DeLoach, great having you on TheCUBE. Thanks very much for coming on. Alright, keep it right there buddy. We'll be back. This is PentahoWorld 2017, and this is TheCUBE. Be right back.

Published Date : Oct 27 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Hitachi Vantara. of the midwest IoT council. The Future of IoT, leveraging the shift the premise of the book. and communications, and to a is that the market is going to shift and the context of the low-fat But, first of all, that's going to change. So if the product providers are smart, Well and the product guys going to the Walmart might say, and if I'm the fast food chain, Well, plus the widget Doesn't have to be a physical edge. and then propagating it to the devices at the edge where and that's only because the got to be very flexible, especially the larger the enterprise, of the entirety of the data set, in a fraction of the space the linkages to the context in order back to the premise of the book. so that I can leverage the and now it starts to come together, and the Insight Group Pentaho and the Insight's play that they bring to the table, Okay, so, but a lot of the not many people remember. and the product strategy and so forth. to those discussions, and credit to Hitachi for pivoting. in the various operations, It goes back to if you the horses in the track, if you will. that they're bringing to bear with Lumada. leveraging the shift to and the other is Emil 2017, and this is TheCUBE.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
HitachiORGANIZATION

0.99+

GEORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

WalmartORGANIZATION

0.99+

Emil BerthelsenPERSON

0.99+

2014DATE

0.99+

SiemensORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

DisneyORGANIZATION

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

eightQUANTITY

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Don DeLoachPERSON

0.99+

Hitachi Data SystemsORGANIZATION

0.99+

Wael ElrifaiPERSON

0.99+

15%QUANTITY

0.99+

Jim HeppelmannPERSON

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

YahooORGANIZATION

0.99+

EmilPERSON

0.99+

30 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

HDSORGANIZATION

0.99+

SeaLandORGANIZATION

0.99+

National Advance SystemsORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 vendorsQUANTITY

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

30 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Insight GroupORGANIZATION

0.99+

Rob TiffanyPERSON

0.99+

700QUANTITY

0.99+

Michael PorterPERSON

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

Hitachi LimitedORGANIZATION

0.99+

PentahoORGANIZATION

0.99+

WikibonORGANIZATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

2025DATE

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

The Future of IoTTITLE

0.99+

Brian HouseholderPERSON

0.99+

Hitachi Data SystemsORGANIZATION

0.99+

Machina ResearchORGANIZATION

0.99+

Hitachi LumadaORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

two years agoDATE

0.99+

Orlando, FloridaLOCATION

0.99+

LumadaORGANIZATION

0.99+

DonPERSON

0.99+

Midwest IoT CouncilORGANIZATION

0.99+

TAMORGANIZATION

0.99+

700 winnersQUANTITY

0.99+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.99+

third pieceQUANTITY

0.99+

first tierQUANTITY

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

Hitachi Insight GroupORGANIZATION

0.99+

25 years agoDATE

0.99+

Hitachi VantaraORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.98+

10QUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

each roomQUANTITY

0.98+

USLOCATION

0.98+

TheCUBEORGANIZATION

0.98+

Amir Khan & Atif Khan, Alkira | Supercloud2


 

(lively music) >> Hello, everyone. Welcome back to the Supercloud presentation here. I'm theCUBE, I'm John Furrier, your host. What a great segment here. We're going to unpack the networking aspect of the cloud, how that translates into what Supercloud architecture and platform deployment scenarios look like. And demystify multi-cloud, hybridcloud. We've got two great experts. Amir Khan, the Co-Founder and CEO of Alkira, Atif Khan, Co-Founder and CTO of Alkira. These guys been around since 2018 with the startup, but before that story, history in the tech industry. I mean, routing early days, multiple waves, multiple cycles. >> Welcome three decades. >> Welcome to Supercloud. >> Thanks. >> Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you so much for having us. >> So, let's get your take on Supercloud because it's been one of those conversations that really galvanized the industry because it kind of highlights almost this next wave, this next side of the street that everyone's going to be on that's going to be successful. The laggards on the legacy seem to be stuck on the old model. SaaS is growing up, it's ISVs, it's ecosystems, hyperscale, full hybrid. And then multi-cloud around the corners cause all this confusion, everyone's hand waving. You know, this is a solution, that solution, where are we? What do you guys see as this supercloud dynamic? >> So where we start from is always focusing on the customer problem. And in 2018 when we identified the problem, we saw that there were multiple clouds with many diverse ways of doing things from the network perspective, and customers were struggling with that. So we delved deeper into that and looked at each one of the cloud architectures completely independent. And there was no common solution and customers were struggling with that from the perspective. They wanted to be in multiple clouds, either through mergers and acquisitions or running an application which may be more cost effective to run in something or maybe optimized for certain reasons to run in a different cloud. But from the networking perspective, everything needed to come together. So that's, we are starting to define it as a supercloud now, but basically, it's a common infrastructure across all clouds. And then integration of high lift services like, you know, security or IPAM services or many other types of services like inter-partner routing and stuff like that. So, Amir, you agree then that multi-cloud is simply a default result of having whatever outcomes, either M&A, some productivity software, maybe Azure. >> Yes. >> Amazon has this and then I've got on-premise application, so it's kinds mishmash. >> So, I would qualify it with hybrid multi-cloud because everything is going to be interconnected. >> John: Got it. >> Whether it's on-premise, remote users or clouds. >> But have CTO perspective, obviously, you got developers, multiple stacks, got AWS, Azure and GCP, other. Not everyone wants to kind of like go all in, but yet they don't want to hedge too much because it's a resource issue. And I got to learn this stack, I got to learn that stack. So then now, you have this default multi-cloud, hybrid multi-cloud, then it's like, okay, what do I do? How do you spread that around? Is it dangerous? What's the the approach technically? What's some of the challenges there? >> Yeah, certainly. John, first, thanks for having us here. So, before I get to that, I'll just add a little bit to what Amir was saying, like how we started, what we were seeing and how it, you know, correlates with the supercloud. So, as you know, before this company, Alkira, we were doing, we did the SD-WAN company, which was Viptela. So there, we started seeing when people started deploying SD-WAN at like a larger scale. We started like, you know, customers coming to us and saying they needed connectivity into the cloud from the SD-WAN. They wanted to extend the SD-WAN fabric to the cloud. So we came up with an architecture, which was like later we started calling them Cloud onRamps, where we built, you know, a transit VPC and put like the virtual instances of SD-WAN appliances extended from there to the cloud. But before we knew, like it started becoming very complicated for the customers because it wasn't just connectivity, it also required, you know, other use cases. You had to instantiate or bring in security appliances in there. You had to secure all of that stuff. There were requirements for, you know, different regions. So you had to bring up the same thing in different regions. Then multiple clouds, what did you do? You had to replicate the same thing in multiple clouds. And now if there was was requirement between clouds, how were you going to do it? You had to route traffic from somewhere, and come up with all those routing controls and stuff. So, it was very complicated. >> Like spaghetti code, but on network. >> The games begin, in fact, one of our customers called it spaghetti mess. And so, that's where like we thought about where was the industry going and which direction the industry was going into? And we came up with the Alkira where what we are doing is building a common infrastructure across multiple clouds, across in, you know, on-prem locations, be it data centers or physical sites, branches sites, et cetera, with integrated security and network networking services inside. And, you know, nowadays, networking is not only about connectivity, you have to secure everything. So, security has to be built in. Redundancy, high availability, disaster recovery. So all of that needs to be built in. So that's like, you know, kind of a definition of like what we thought at that time, what is turning into supercloud now. >> Yeah. It's interesting too, you mentioned, you know, VPCs is not, configuration of loans a hassle. Nevermind the manual mistakes could be made, but as you decide to do something you got to, "Oh, we got to get these other things." A lot of the hyper scales and a lot of the alpha cloud players now, and cloud native folks, they're kind of in that mode of, "Wow, look at what we've built." Now, they're got to maintain, how do I refresh it? Like, how do I keep the talent? So they got this similar chaotic environment where it's like, okay, now they're already already through, so I think they're going to be okay. But then some people want to bypass it completely. So there's a lot of customers that we see out there that fit the makeup of, I'm cloud first, I've lifted and shifted, I move some stuff to the cloud. But I want to bypass all that learnings from all the people that are gone through the past three years. Can I just skip that and go to a multi-cloud or coherent infrastructure? What do you think about that? What's your view? >> So yeah, so if you look at these enterprises, you know, many of them just to find like the talent, which for one cloud as far as the IT staff is concerned, it's hard enough. And now, when you have multiple clouds, it's hard to find people the talent which is, you know, which has expertise across different clouds. So that's where we come into the picture. So our vision was always to simplify all of this stuff. And simplification, it cannot be just simplification because you cannot just automate the workflows of the cloud providers underneath. So you have to, you know, provide your full data plane on top of it, fed full control plane, management plane, policy and management on top of it. And coming back to like your question, so these nowadays, those people who are working on networking, you know, before it used to be like CLI. You used to learn about Cisco CLI or Juniper CLI, and you used to work on it. Nowadays, it's very different. So automation, programmability, all of that stuff is the key. So now, you know, Ops guys, the DevOps guys, so these are the people who are in high demand. >> So what do you think about the folks out there that are saying, okay, you got a lot of fragmentation. I got the stacks, I got a lot of stove pipes, if you will, out there on the stack. I got to learn this from Azure. Can you guys have with your product abstract the way that's so developers don't need to know the ins and outs of stack's, almost like a gateway, if you will, the old days. But like I'm a developer or team develop, why should I have to learn the management layer of Azure? >> That's exactly what we started, you know, out with to solve. So it's, what we have built is a platform and the platform sits inside the cloud. And customers are able to build their own network or a virtual network on top using that platform. So the platform has its own data plane, own control plane and management plane with a policy layer on top of it. So now, it's the platform which is sitting in different clouds, but from a customer's point of view, it's one way of doing networking. One way of instantiating or bringing in services or security services in the middle. Whether those are our security services or whether those are like services from our partners, like Palo Alto or Checkpoint or Cisco. >> So you guys brought the SD-WAN mojo and refactored it for the cloud it sounds like. >> No. >> No? (chuckles) >> We cannot said. >> All right, explain. >> It's way more than that. >> I mean, SD-WAN was wan. I mean, you're talking about wide area networks, talking about connected, so explain the difference. >> SD-WAN was primarily done for one major reason. MPLS was expensive, very strong SLAs, but very low speed. Internet, on the other hand, you sat at home and you could access your applications much faster. No SLA, very low cost, right? So we wanted to marry the two together so you could have a purely private infrastructure and a public infrastructure and secure both of them by creating a common secure fabric across all those environments. And then seamlessly tying it into your internal branch and data center and cloud network. So, it merely brought you to the edge of the cloud. It didn't do anything inside the cloud. Now, the major problem resides inside the clouds where you have to optimize the clouds themselves. Take a step back. How were the clouds built? Basically, the cloud providers went to the Ciscos and Junipers and the rest of the world, built the network in the data centers or across wide area infrastructure, and brought it all together and tried to create a virtualized layer on top of that. But there were many limitations of this underlying infrastructure that they had built. So number of routes per region, how inter region connectivity worked, or how many routes you could carry to the VPCs of V nets? That all those were becoming no common policy across, you know, these environments, no segmentation across these environments, right? So the networking constructs that the enterprise customers were used to as enterprise class carry class capabilities, they did not exist in the cloud. So what did the customer do? They ended up stitching it together all manually. And that's why Atif was alluding to earlier that it became a spaghetti mess for the customers. And then what happens is, as a result, day two operations, you know, troubleshooting, everything becomes a nightmare. So what do you do? You have to build an infrastructure inside the cloud. Cloud has enough raw capabilities to build the solutions inside there. Netflix's of the world. And many different companies have been born in the cloud and evolved from there. So why could we not take the raw capabilities of the clouds and build a network cloud or a supercloud on top of these clouds to optimize the whole infrastructure and seamlessly connecting it into the on-premise and remote user locations, right? So that's your, you know, hybrid multi-cloud solution. >> Well, great call out on the SD-WAN in common versus cloud. 'Cause I think this is important because you're building a network layer in the cloud that spans out so the customers don't have to get into the, there's a gap in the system that I'm used to, my operating environment, of having lockdown security and network. >> So yeah. So what you do is you use the raw capabilities like bandwidth or virtual machines, or you know, containers, or, you know, different types of serverless capabilities. And you bring it all together in a way to solve the networking problems, thereby creating a supercloud, which is an abstraction layer which hides all the complexity of the underlying clouds from the customer, right? And it provides a common infrastructure across all environments to that customer, right? That's the beauty of it. And it does it in a way that it looks like, if they have the networking knowledge, they can apply it to this new environment and carry it forward. One way of doing security across all clouds and hybrid environments. One way of doing routing. One way of doing large-scale network address translation. One way of doing IPAM services. So people are tired of doing individual things and individual clouds and on-premise locations, right? So now they're getting something common. >> You guys brought that, you brought all that to bear and flexible for the customer to essentially self-serve their network cloud. >> Yes, yeah. Is that the wave? >> And nowadays, from business perspective, agility is the key, right? You have to move at the pace of the business. If you don't, you are losing. >> So, would it be safe to say that you guys have a network supercloud? >> Absolutely, yeah. >> We, pretty much, yeah. Absolutely. >> What does that mean to our customer? What's in it for them? What's the benefit to the customer? I got a network supercloud, it connects, provides SLA, all the capabilities I need. What do they get? What's the end point for them? What's the end? >> Atif, maybe you can talk some examples. >> The IT infrastructure is all like distributed now, right? So you have applications running in data centers. You have applications running in one cloud. Other cloud, public clouds, enterprises are depending on so many SaaS applications. So now, these are, you can call these endpoints. So a supercloud or a network cloud, from our perspective, it's a cloud in the middle or a network in the middle, which provides connectivity from any endpoint to any endpoint. So, you are able to connect to the supercloud or network cloud in one way no matter where you are. So now, whichever cloud you are in, whichever cloud you need to connect to. And also, it's not just connecting to the cloud. So you need to do a lot of stuff, a lot of networking inside the cloud also. So now, as Amir was saying, every cloud has its own from a networking, you know, the concept perspective or the construct, they are different. There are limitations in there also. So this supercloud, which is sitting on top, basically, your platform is sitting into the cloud, but the supercloud is built on top of using your platform. So that abstracts all those complexities, all those limitations. So now your limitations are whatever the limitations of that platform are. So now your platform, that platform is in our control. So we can keep building it, we can keep scaling it horizontally. Because one of the things is that, you know, in this cloud era, one of the things is autoscaling these services. So why can't the network now autoscale also, just like your other services. >> Network autoscaling is a genius idea, and I think that's a killer. I want to ask the the follow on question because I think, first of all, I love what you guys are doing. So, I think it's a great example of this new innovation. It's not obvious until you see it, right? Geographical is huge. So, you know, single instance, global instances, multiple instances, you're seeing global. How do you guys look at that global equation? Because as companies expand their clouds into geos, and then ultimately, you know, it's obviously continent, region and locales. You're going to have geographic issues. So, this is an extension of your network cloud? >> Amir: It is the extension of the network cloud because if you look at this hyperscalers, they're sitting pretty much everywhere in the globe. So, wherever their regions are, the beauty of building a supercloud is that you can by definition, be available in those regions. It literally takes a day or two of testing for our stack to run in those regions, to make sure there are no nuances that we run into, you know, for that region. The moment we bring it up in that region, all customers can onboard into that solution. So literally, what used to take months or years to build a global infrastructure, now, you can configure it in 10 minutes basically, and bring it up in less than one hour. Since when did we see any solution- >> And by the way, >> that can come up with. >> when the edge comes out too, you're going to start to see more clouds get bolted on. >> Exactly. And you can expand to the edge of the network. That's why we call cloud the new edge, right? >> John: Yeah, it is. Now, I think you guys got a good solutions, network clouds, superclouds, good. So the question on the premise side, so I get the cloud play. It's very cool. You can expand out. It's a nice layer. I'm sure you manage the SLAs between latency and all kinds of things. Knowing when not to do things. Physics or physics. Okay. Now, you've got the on-premise. What's the on-premise equation look like? >> So on-premise, the kind of customers, we are working with large enterprises, mid-size enterprises. So they have on-prem networks, they have deployed, in many cases, they have deployed SD-WAN. In many cases, they have MPLS. They have data centers also. And a lot of these companies are, you know, moving the applications from the data center into the cloud. But we still have large enterprise- >> But for you guys, you can sit there too with non server or is it a box or what is it? >> It's a software stack, right? So, we are a software company. >> Okay, so no box. >> No box. >> Okay, got it. >> No box. >> It's even better. So, we can connect any, as I mentioned, any endpoint, whether it's data centers. So, what happens is usually these enterprises from the data centers- >> John: It's a cloud endpoint for you. >> Cloud endpoint for us. And they need highspeed connectivity into the cloud. And our network cloud is sitting inside the or supercloud is sitting inside the cloud. So we need highspeed connectivity from the data centers. This is like multi-gig type of connectivity. So we enable that connectivity as a service. And as Amir was saying, you are able to bring it up in minutes, pretty much. >> John: Well, you guys have a great handle on supercloud. I really appreciate you guys coming on. I have to ask you guys, since you have so much experience in the industry, multiple inflection points you've guys lived through and we're all old, and we can remember those glory days. What's the big deal going on right now? Because you can connect the dots and you can imagine, okay, like a Lambda function spinning up some connectivity. I need instant access to a new route, throw some, I need to send compute to an edge point for process data. A lot of these kind of ad hoc services are going to start flying around, which used to be manually configured as you guys remember. >> Amir: And that's been the problem, right? The shadow IT, that was the biggest problem in the enterprise environment. So that's what we are trying to get the customers away from. Cloud teams came in, individuals or small groups of people spun up instances in the cloud. It was completely disconnected from the on-premise environment or the existing IT environment that the customer had. So, how do you bring it together? And that's what we are trying to solve for, right? At a large scale, in a carrier cloud center (indistinct). >> What do you call that? Shift right or shift left? Shift left is in the cloud native world security. >> Amir: Yes. >> Networking and security, the two hottest areas. What are you shifting? Up or down? I mean, the network's moving up the stack. I mean, you're seeing the run times at Kubernetes later' >> Amir: Right, right. It's true we're end-to-end virtualization. So you have plumbing, which is the physical infrastructure. Then on top of that, now for the first time, you have true end-to-end virtualization, which the cloud-like constructs are providing to us. We tried to virtualize the routers, we try to virtualize instances at the server level. Now, we are bringing it all together in a truly end-to-end virtualized manner to connect any endpoint anywhere across the globe. Whether it's on-premise, home, multiple clouds, or SaaS type environments. >> Yeah. If you talk about the technical benefits beyond virtualizations, you kind of see in virtualization be abstracted away. So you got end-to-end virtualization, but you don't need to know virtualization to take advantage of it. >> Exactly. Exactly. >> What are some of the tech involved where, what's the trend around on top of virtual? What's the easy button for that? >> So there are many, many use cases from the customers and they're, you know, some of those use cases, they used to deliver out of their data centers before. So now, because you, know, it takes a long time to spend something up in the data center and stuff. So the trend is and what enterprises are looking for is agility. And to achieve that agility, they are moving those services or those use cases into the cloud. So another technical benefit of like something like a supercloud and what we are doing is we allow customers to, you know, move their services from existing data centers into the cloud as well. And I'll give you some examples. You know, these enterprises have, you know, tons of partners. They provide connectivity to their partners, to select resources. It used to happen inside the data center. You would bring in connectivity into the data center and apply like tons of ACLs and whatnot to make sure that you are able to only connect. And now those use cases are, they need to be enabled inside the cloud. And the customer's customers are also, it's not just coming from the on-prem, they're coming from the cloud as well. So, if they're coming from the cloud as well as from on-prem, so you need like an infrastructure like supercloud, which is sitting inside the cloud and is able to handle all these use cases. So all of these use cases have to be, so that requires like moving those services from the data center into the cloud or into the supercloud. So, they're, oh, as we started building this service over the last four years, we have come across so many use cases. And to deliver those use cases, you have to have a platform. So you have to have your own platform because otherwise you are depending on somebody else's, you know, capabilities. And every time their capabilities change, you have to change. >> John: I'm glad you brought up the platform 'cause I want to get your both reaction to this. So Bob Muglia just said on theCUBE here at Supercloud, that supercloud is a platform that provides programmatically consistent services hosted on heterogeneous cloud providers. So the question is, is supercloud a platform or an architecture in your view? >> That's an interesting view on things, you know? I mean, if you think of it, you have to design or architect a solution before we turn it into a platform. >> John: It's a trick question actually. >> So it's a, you know, so we look at it as that you have to have an architectural approach end to end, right? And then you build a solution based on that approach. So, I don't think that they are mutually exclusive. I think they go hand in hand. It's an architecture that you turn into a solution and provide that agility and high availability and disaster recovery capability that it built into that. >> It's interesting that these definitions might be actually redefined with this new configuration. >> Amir: Yes. >> Because architecture and platform used to mean something, like, aight here's a platform, you buy this platform. >> And then you architecture solution. >> Architect it via vendor. >> Right, right, right. >> Okay. And they have to deal with that architecture in the place of multiple superclouds. If you have too many stove pipes, then what's the purpose of supercloud? >> Right, right, right. And because, you know, historically, you built a router and you sold it to the customer. And the poor customer was supposed to install it all, you know, and interconnect all those things. And if you have 40, 50,000 router network, which we saw in our lifetime, 'cause there used to be many more branches when we were growing up in the networking industry, right? You had to create hierarchy and all kinds of things to figure out how to solve that problem. We are no longer living in that world anymore. You cannot deploy individual virtual instances. And that's what approach a lot of people are taking, which is a pure overly network. You cannot take that approach anymore. You have to evolve the architecture and then build the solution based on that architecture so that it becomes a platform which is readily available, highly scalable, and available. And at the same time, it's very, very easy to deploy. It's a SaaS type solution, right? >> So you're saying, do the architecture to get the solution for the platform that the customer has. >> Amir: Yes. >> They're not buying a platform, they end up with a platform- >> With the platform. >> as a result of Supercloud path. All right. So that's what's, so you mentioned, that's a great point. I want to double click on what you just said. 'Cause I like that what you said. What's the deployment strategy in your mind for supercloud? I'm an architect. I'm at an enterprise in the Midwest. I'm an insurance company, got some cloud action going on. I'm mostly on-premise. I've got the mandate to transform the company. We have apps. We'll be fully transformed in five years. What's my strategy? What do I do? >> Amir: The resources. >> What's the deployment strategy? Single global instance, code in every region, on every cloud? >> It needs to be a solution which is available as a SaaS service, right? So from the customer's perspective, they are onboarding into the supercloud. And then the supercloud is allowing them to do whatever they used to do, you know, historically and in the new world, right? That needs to come together. And that's what we have built is that, we have brought everything together in a way that what used to take months or years, and now taking an hour or two hours, and then people test it for a week or so and deploy it in production. >> I want to bring up something we were talking about before we were on camera about the TCP/IP, the OSI model. That was a concept that destroyed the proprietary narcissist. Work operating systems of the mini computers, which brought in an era of tech prosperity for generations. TCP/IP was kind of the magical moment that allowed for that kind of super networking connection. Inter networking is what's called as a category. It feels like something's going on here with supercloud. The way you describe it, it feels like there's this unification idea. Like the reality is we've got multiple stuff sitting around by default, you either clean it up or get rid of it, right? Or it's almost a, it's either a nuance, a new nuisance or chaos. >> Yeah. And we live in the new world now. We don't have the luxury of time. So we need to move as fast as possible to solve the business problems. And that's what we are running into. If we don't have automated solutions which scale, which solve our problems, then it's going to be a problem. And that's why SaaS is so important in today's world. Why should we have to deploy the network piecemeal? Why can't we have a solution? We solve our problem as we move forward and we accomplish what we need to accomplish and move forward. >> And we don't really need standards here, dude. It's not that we need a standards body if you have unification. >> So because things move so fast, there's no time to create a standards body. And that's why you see companies like ours popping up, which are trying to create a common infrastructure across all clouds. Otherwise if we vent the standardization path may take long. Eventually, we should be going in that direction. But we don't have the luxury of time. That's what I was trying to get to. >> Well, what's interesting is, is that to your point about standards and ratification, what ratifies a defacto anything? In the old days there was some technical bodies involved, but here, I think developers drive everything. So if you look at the developers and how they're voting with their code. They're instantly, organically defining everything as a collective intelligence. >> And just like you're putting out the paper and making it available, everybody's contributing to that. That's why you need to have APIs and terra form type constructs, which are available so that the customers can continue to improve upon that. And that's the Net DevOps, right? So that you need to have. >> What was once sacrilege, just sayin', in business school, back in the days when I got my business degree after my CS degree was, you know, no one wants to have a better mousetrap, a bad business model to have a better mouse trap. In this case, the better mouse trap, the better solution actually could be that thing. >> It is that thing. >> I mean, that can trigger, tips over the industry. >> And that that's where we are seeing our customers. You know, I mean, we have some publicly referenceable customers like Coke or Warner Music Group or, you know, multiple others and chart industries. The way we are solving the problem. They have some of the largest environments in the industry from the cloud perspective. And their whole network infrastructure is running on the Alkira infrastructure. And they're able to adopt new clouds within days rather than waiting for months to architect and then deploy and then figure out how to manage it and operate it. It's available as a service. >> John: And we've heard from your customer, Warner, they were just on the program. >> Amir: Yes. Okay, okay. >> So they're building a supercloud. So superclouds aren't just for tech companies. >> Amir: No. >> You guys build a supercloud for networking. >> Amir: It is. >> But people are building their own superclouds on top of all this new stuff. Talk about that dynamic. >> Healthcare providers, financials, high-tech companies, even startups. One of our startup customers, Tekion, right? They have these dealerships that they provide sales and support services to across the globe. And for them to be able to onboard those dealerships, it is 80% less time to production. That is real money, right? So, maybe Atif can give you a lot more examples of customers who are deploying. >> Talk about some of the customer activity. What are they like? Are they laggards, they innovators? Are they trying to hit the easy button? Are they coming in late or are you got some high customers? >> Actually most of our customers, all of our customers or customers in general. I don't think they have a choice but to move in this direction because, you know, the cloud has, like everything is quick now. So the cloud teams are moving faster in these enterprises. So now that they cannot afford the network nor to keep up pace with the cloud teams. So, they don't have a choice but to go with something similar where you can, you know, build your network on demand and bring up your network as quickly as possible to meet all those use cases. So, I'll give you an example. >> John: So the demand's high for what you guys do. >> Demand is very high because the cloud teams have- >> John: Yeah. They're going fast. >> They're going fast and there's no stopping. And then network teams, they have to keep up with them. And you cannot keep deploying, you know, networks the way you used to deploy back in the day. And as far as the use cases are concerned, there are so many use cases which our customers are using our platform for. One of the use cases, I'll give you an example of these financial customers. Some of the financial customers, they have their customers who they provide data, like stock exchanges, that provide like market data information to their customers out of data centers part. But now, their customers are moving into the cloud as well. So they need to come in from the cloud. So when they're coming in from the cloud, you cannot be giving them data from your data center because that takes time, and your hair pinning everything back. >> Moving data is like moving, moving money, someone said. >> Exactly. >> Exactly. And the other thing is like you have to optimize your traffic flows in the cloud as well because every time you leave the cloud, you get charged a lot. So, you don't want to leave the cloud unless you have to leave the cloud, your traffic. So, you have to come up or use a service which allows you to optimize all those traffic flows as well, you know? >> My final question to you guys, first of all, thanks for coming on Supercloud Program. Really appreciate it. Congratulations on your success. And you guys have a great positioning and I'm a big fan. And I have to ask, you guys are agile, nimble startup, smart on the cutting edge. Supercloud concept seems to resonate with people who are kind of on the front range of this major wave. While all the incumbents like Cisco, Microsoft, even AWS, they're like, I think they're looking at it, like what is that? I think it's coming up really fast, this trend. Because I know people talk about multi-cloud, I get that. But like, this whole supercloud is not just SaaS, it's more going on there. What do you think is going on between the folks who get it, supercloud, get the concept, and some are who are scratching their heads, whether it's the Ciscos or someone, like I don't get it. Why is supercloud important for the folks that aren't really seeing it? >> So first of all, I mean, the customers, what we saw about six months, 12 months ago, were a little slower to adopt the supercloud kind of concept. And there were leading edge customers who were coming and adopting it. Now, all of a sudden, over the last six to nine months, we've seen a flurry of customers coming in and they are from all disciplines or all very diverse set of customers. And they're starting to see the value of that because of the practical implications of what they're doing. You know, these shadow IT type environments are no longer working and there's a lot of pressure from the management to move faster. And then that's where they're coming in. And perhaps, Atif, if you can give a few examples of. >> Yeah. And I'll also just add to your point earlier about the network needing to be there 'cause the cloud teams are like, let's go faster. And the network's always been slow because, but now, it's been almost turbocharged. >> Atif: Yeah. Yeah, exactly. And as I said, like there was no choice here. You had to move in this industry. And the other thing I would add a little bit is now if you look at all these enterprises, most of their traffic is from, even from which is coming from the on-prem, it's going to the cloud SaaS applications or public clouds. And it's more than 50% of traffic, which is leaving your, you know, what you used to call, your network or the private network. So now it's like, you know, before it used to just connect sites to data centers and sites together. Now, it's a cloud as well as the SaaS application. So it's either internet bound or the public cloud bound. So now you have to build a network quickly, which caters to all these use cases. And that's where like something- >> And you guys, your solution to me is you eliminate all that work for the customer. Now, they can treat the cloud like a bag of Legos. And do their thing. Well, I oversimplify. Well, you know I'm talking about. >> Atif: Right, exactly. >> And to answer your question earlier about what about the big companies coming in and, you know, now they slow to adopt? And, you know, what normally happens is when Cisco came up, right? There used to be 16 different protocols suites. And then we finally settled on TCP/IP and DECnet or AppleTalk or X&S or, you know, you name it, right? Those companies did not adapt to the networking the way it was supposed to be done. And guess what happened, right? So if the companies in the networking space do not adopt this new concept or new way of doing things, I think some of them will become extinct over time. >> Well, I think the force and function too is the cloud teams as well. So you got two evolutions. You got architectural relevance. That's real as impact. >> It's very important. >> Cost, speed. >> And I look at it as a very similar disruption to what Cisco's the world, very early days did to, you know, bring the networking out, right? And it became the internet. But now we are going through the cloud. It's the cloud era, right? How does the cloud evolve over the next 10, 15, 20 years? Everything's is going to be offered as a service, right? So slowly data centers go away, the network becomes a plumbing thing. Very, you know, simple to deploy. And everything on top of that is virtualized in the cloud-like manners. >> And that makes the networks hardened and more secure. >> More secure. >> It's a great way to be secure. You remember the glory days, we'll go back 15 years. The Cisco conversation was, we got to move up to stack. All the manager would fight each other. Now, what does that actually mean? Stay where we are. Stay in your lane. This is kind of like the network's version of moving up the stack because not so much up the stack, but the cloud is everywhere. It's almost horizontally scaled. >> It's extending into the on-premise. It is already moving towards the edge, right? So, you will see a lot- >> So, programmability is a big program. So you guys are hitting programmability, compatibility, getting people into an environment they're comfortable operating. So the Ops people love it. >> Exactly. >> Spans the clouds to a level of SLA management. It might not be perfectly spanning applications, but you can actually know latencies between clouds, measure that. And then so you're basically managing your network now as the overall infrastructure. >> Right. And it needs to be a very intelligent infrastructure going forward, right? Because customers do not want to wait to be able to troubleshoot. They don't want to be able to wait to deploy something, right? So, it needs to be a level of automation. >> Okay. So the question for you guys both on we'll end on is what is the enablement that, because you guys are a disruptive enabler, right? You create this fabric. You're going to enable companies to do stuff. What are some of the things that you see and your customers might be seeing as things that they're going to do as a result of having this enablement? So what are some of those things? >> Amir: Atif, perhaps you can talk through the some of the customer experience on that. >> It's agility. And we are allowing these customers to move very, very quickly and build these networks which meet all these requirements inside the cloud. Because as Amir was saying, in the cloud era, networking is changing. And if you look at, you know, going back to your comment about the existing networking vendors. Some of them still think that, you know, just connecting to the cloud using some concepts like Cloud OnRamp is cloud networking, but it's changing now. >> John: 'Cause there's apps that are depending upon. >> Exactly. And it's all distributed. Like IT infrastructure, as I said earlier, is all distributed. And at the end of the day, you have to make sure that wherever your user is, wherever your app is, you are able to connect them securely. >> Historically, it used to be about building a router bigger and bigger and bigger and bigger, you know, and then interconnecting those routers. Now, it's all about horizontal scale. You don't need to build big, you need to scale it, right? And that's what cloud brings to the customer. >> It's a cultural change for Cisco and Juniper because they have to understand that they're still could be in the game and still win. >> Exactly. >> The question I have for you, what are your customers telling you that, what's some of the anecdotal, like, 'cause you guys have a good solution, is it, "Oh my god, you guys saved my butt." Or what are some of the commentary that you hear from the customers in terms of praise and and glory from your solution? >> Oh, some even say, when we do our demo and stuff, they say it's too hard to believe. >> Believe. >> Like, too hard. It's hard, you know, it's >> I dont believe you. They're skeptics. >> I don't believe you that because now you're able to bring up a global network within minutes. With networking services, like let's say you have APAC, you know, on-prem users, cloud also there, cloud here, users here, you can bring up a global network with full routed connectivity between all these endpoints with security services. You can bring up like a firewall from a third party or our services in the middle. This is a matter of minutes now. And this is all high speed connectivity with SLAs. Imagine like before connecting, you know, Singapore to U.S. East or Hong Kong to Frankfurt, you know, if you were putting your infrastructure in columns like E-connects, you would have to go, you know, figure out like, how am I going to- >> Seal line In, connect to it? Yeah. A lot of hassles, >> If you had to put like firewalls in the middle, segmentation, you had to, you know, isolate different entities. >> That's called heavy lifting. >> So what you're seeing is, you know, it's like customer comes in, there's a disbelief, can you really do that? And then they try it out, they go, "Wow, this works." Right? It's deployed in a small environment. And then all of a sudden they start taking off, right? And literally we have seen customers go from few thousand dollars a month or year type deployments to multi-million dollars a year type deployments in very, very short amount of time, in a few months. >> And you guys are pay as you go? >> Pay as you go. >> Pay as go usage cloud-based compatibility. >> Exactly. And it's amazing once they get to deploy the solution. >> What's the variable on the cost? >> On the cost? >> Is it traffic or is it. >> It's multiple different things. It's packaged into the overall solution. And as a matter of fact, we end up saving a lot of money to the customers. And not only in one way, in multiple different ways. And we do a complete TOI analysis for the customers. So it's bandwidth, it's number of connections, it's the amount of compute power that we are using. >> John: Similar things that they're used to. >> Just like the cloud constructs. Yeah. >> All right. Networking supercloud. Great. Congratulations. >> Thank you so much. >> Thanks for coming on Supercloud. >> Atif: Thank you. >> And looking forward to seeing more of the demand. Translate, instant networking. I'm sure it's going to be huge with the edge exploding. >> Oh yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah. >> Congratulations. >> Thank you so much. >> Thank you so much. >> Okay. So this is Supercloud 2 event here in Palo Alto. I'm John Furrier. The network Supercloud is here. Checkout Alkira. I'm John Furry, the host. Thanks for watching. (lively music)

Published Date : Feb 17 2023

SUMMARY :

networking aspect of the cloud, that really galvanized the industry of the cloud architectures Amazon has this and then going to be interconnected. Whether it's on-premise, So then now, you have So you had to bring up the same So all of that needs to be built in. and a lot of the alpha cloud players now, So now, you know, Ops So what do you think So now, it's the platform which is sitting So you guys brought the SD-WAN mojo so explain the difference. So what do you do? a network layer in the So what you do is and flexible for the customer Is that the wave? agility is the key, right? We, pretty much, yeah. the benefit to the customer? So you need to do a lot of stuff, and then ultimately, you know, that we run into, you when the edge comes out too, And you can expand So the question on the premise side, So on-premise, the kind of customers, So, we are a software company. from the data centers- or supercloud is sitting inside the cloud. I have to ask you guys, since that the customer had. Shift left is in the cloud I mean, the network's moving up the stack. So you have plumbing, which is So you got end-to-end virtualization, Exactly. So you have to have your own platform So the question is, it, you have to design So it's a, you know, It's interesting that these definitions you buy this platform. in the place of multiple superclouds. And because, you know, for the platform that the customer has. 'Cause I like that what you said. So from the customer's perspective, of the mini computers, We don't have the luxury of time. if you have unification. And that's why you see So if you look at the developers So that you need to have. in business school, back in the days I mean, that can trigger, from the cloud perspective. from your customer, Warner, So they're building a supercloud. You guys build a Talk about that dynamic. And for them to be able to the customer activity. So the cloud teams are moving John: So the demand's the way you used to Moving data is like moving, And the other thing is And I have to ask, you guys from the management to move faster. about the network needing to So now you have to to me is you eliminate all So if the companies in So you got two evolutions. And it became the internet. And that makes the networks hardened This is kind of like the network's version It's extending into the on-premise. So you guys are hitting Spans the clouds to a So, it needs to be a level of automation. What are some of the things that you see of the customer experience on that. And if you look at, you know, that are depending upon. And at the end of the day, and bigger, you know, in the game and still win. commentary that you hear they say it's too hard to believe. It's hard, you know, it's I dont believe you. Imagine like before connecting, you know, Seal line In, connect to it? firewalls in the middle, can you really do that? Pay as go usage get to deploy the solution. it's the amount of compute that they're used to. Just like the cloud constructs. All right. And looking forward to I'm John Furry, the host.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AmirPERSON

0.99+

Bob MugliaPERSON

0.99+

Amir KhanPERSON

0.99+

Atif KhanPERSON

0.99+

John FurryPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

CokeORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Warner Music GroupORGANIZATION

0.99+

AtifPERSON

0.99+

CiscosORGANIZATION

0.99+

AlkiraPERSON

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

an hourQUANTITY

0.99+

AlkiraORGANIZATION

0.99+

FrankfurtLOCATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

JuniperORGANIZATION

0.99+

SingaporeLOCATION

0.99+

a dayQUANTITY

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

U.S. EastLOCATION

0.99+

Palo AltoORGANIZATION

0.99+

16 different protocolsQUANTITY

0.99+

JunipersORGANIZATION

0.99+

CheckpointORGANIZATION

0.99+

Hong KongLOCATION

0.99+

10 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

less than one hourQUANTITY

0.99+

ViptelaORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

more than 50%QUANTITY

0.99+

one wayQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

SupercloudORGANIZATION

0.98+

Supercloud 2EVENT

0.98+

LambdaTITLE

0.98+

One wayQUANTITY

0.98+

CLITITLE

0.98+

supercloudORGANIZATION

0.98+

12 months agoDATE

0.98+

LegosORGANIZATION

0.98+

APACORGANIZATION

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

Priyanka Sharma, CNCF | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2022


 

(gentle upbeat music) >> Hello everyone, and welcome back to KubeCon CloudNativeCon here in Detroit, Michigan. My name is Savannah Peterson, joined with John Furrier. John, we are in the meat of the conference. >> It's really in crunch time, day two of three days of wall-to-wall coverage and this next guest is running the show at CNCF, the OG and been in the community doing a great job. I'm looking forward to this segment. >> Me too. I'm even wearing... You may notice, I am in my CNCF tee, and I actually brought my tee from last year for those of you. And the reason I brought it, actually, I want to use this to help introduce our next guest is the theme last year was resistance realized, and I think that KubeCon this year is an illustration of that resistance realized. Please welcome Priyanka Sharma to the show. Priyanka, thank you so much for being here with us. >> Thank you for having me. >> This is your show. How are you feeling right now? What does it feel like to be here? >> It's all of our show. I am just another participant, but I am so happy to be here. I think this is our third hybrid in person back event. And the whole ecosystem, we seem to have gotten into the groove now. You know, the first one we did, was in LA >> Savannah: Yes. >> Where you have that shirt from. Then we went to Valencia, and now here in Detroit I could sense the ease in the attendees. I can sense that it just feels great for everyone to be here. >> Savannah: Yeah. >> And you guys, who were face to face in LA, but this is really kind of back face to face, somewhat normalized, right? >> Priyanka: Yeah. >> And so that's a lot of feedback there. What's your reaction? Because the community's changed so much in three years, >> Savannah: Yes. >> Even two years, even last year. Where do you see it now? Because there's so much more work to do, but it feels like it's just getting started, but also at the same time it feels like people are celebrating at the same time. >> Yeah. >> Kubernetes is mainstream, CloudNative at scale. >> Savannah: That feels like a celebration. >> People are talking about developer... more developers coming on board, more traction, more scale, more interoperability, just a lot of action. What's your thoughts? >> I think you're absolutely right that we are just getting started. I've been part of many open source movements and communities. This is... I think this is something special where we have our flagship project considered mainstream, but yet so much to be done right over there. I mean, you've seen announcements around more and more vendors coming to support the project in, you know, the boring but essential ways that happened I think this week, just today, I think. And so Kubernetes continues to garner support and energy, which is unique in the ecosystem, right? Because once something becomes mainstream, normally, it's like, "Okay, boring." (John laughs) But that's happening. And I think the reason for that is CloudNative. It's built upon Kubernetes and so much more than Kubernetes. >> We have 140 plus projects >> Absolutely. >> and folks have a choice to contribute to something totally cutting edge or something that's, you know, used by everyone. So, the diversity of options and room for innovation at the same time means this is just the beginning. >> And also projects are coming together too. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> You're starting to see formation, you're starting to see some defacto alignment. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> You're starting to see the- >> Priyanka: Clustering. >> Some visibility into how the big moves are being playing out, almost the harvesting of that hard work. >> Priyanka: Yes, I do think there is consolidation, but I would definitely say that there's consolidation and innovation. >> John: Yeah. >> And that is something... I genuinely have not seen this before. I think there are definitely areas we're all really focusing on. I talked a lot about security in my keynote because it continues to gain importance in CloudNative, whether that is through projects or through practices. The same, I did not mention this in my keynote, but around like, you know, continuous delivery generally the software delivery cycle, there's a lot coming together happening there. And, you know, >> John: Yeah. >> many other spaces. So, absolutely right. >> Let's dig in a little bit actually, because I'm curious. You get to see these 140 plus projects. >> Yes. >> What are some of the other trends that you're seeing, especially now, as we're feeling this momentum around Kubernetes? The excitement is back in the ecosystem. >> Yes. So, so much happening. But I would definitely say that like the underlying basis of all these projects, right? I brought that up in my keynote, is the maintainers. And I think the maintainer group, is the talent keeps thriving and growing, the load on them is very heavy though. >> Savannah: Yeah. >> And I do think there's a lot more we all company, the companies around us need to do to support these people, because the innovation they're bringing is unprecedented. Besides Kubernetes, which has its own cool stuff all the time. I think I'm particularly excited about the Argo projects. >> Savannah: Yeah. >> So, they're the quadruplets as I like to call them. Right? Because there's four of them within the Argo banner. I had Yuan from Argo on my keynote actually. >> Savannah: Oh, nice. >> Alongside Hiba from Kubernetes. And we talked about their maintainer journey. And it's interesting. Totally different projects. Same asks, you know, which is more support and time from employers, more ways to build up contributors and ultimately they love the CNCF marketing supports. >> That Argo project's really in a great umbrella. There are a lot of action going on. Arlon, I saw that. Got some traction. A lot of great stuff. The question I want to ask you, and I want to get your reaction to this, you know, we always go to a lot of events with theCUBE and you can always tell the vibrant of the ecosystem when you see developers doing stuff, projects going on. But when you start seeing the commercialization >> Priyanka: Yes. >> The news briefings coming out of this show feels a lot like reinvent, like it's like a tsunami. I've never seen this much news. Everyone's got a story, they got announcing products. >> Savannah: That was a lot of news. That's a great point, John. >> There was a lot of flow even from the CNCF. >> Yeah. >> What's your reaction to that? I mean like to me it's a tell sign of activity, certainly, >> Right. >> And engagement. >> Right. >> But there's real proof coming out, real visibility into the value propositions, >> Priyanka: Yes. >> rendering itself with real products. What's your reaction to the news flow? >> Absolutely. I think it's market proof, like you said, right? >> Savannah: Yeah. >> That we have awesome technologies that are useful to lots of people around the world. And I think that, I hope this continues to increase. And with the bite basket of project portfolios that's what I hope to see. CNCF itself will continue supporting the maintainers with things like conformance programs which are really essential when you are... when you have people building products on top of your projects and other initiatives so that the technological integrity remains solid while innovation keeps happening. >> I know from a little birdie, Brendan, good friend of mine that you had a board meeting today. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> And I am curious because I hope I'm not going out about an assumption I imagine that room is full of passionate people. >> Priyanka: Absolutely. >> CNCF board would be a wild one. (Priyanka laughs) What are the priorities for the board between now and KubeCon next year? >> Sure. So the CNCF governing board is an over... It's like an oversight body. And their focus is on working with us on the executive team to make sure that we have the right game plan for the foundation. They tend to focus on the business decisions, things such as how do we manage our budget, how do we deploy it, and what are the initiatives? And that's always their priority. But because this is CloudNative and we are all technologists who love our projects, >> Savannah: Yeah. >> we also engage closely with the technical oversight committee who was in the said meeting that we just talked about. And so lots of discussions are around project health, sustainability. How do we keep moving? Because as you said, Kubernetes is going mainstream but it's still cool. There are all these other cool things. It's a lot going on, right? >> Savannah: Yeah. You got a lot of balls in the air. It's complex decision making and balancing of priorities. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> John: And demands, stakeholders. You have how many stakeholders? Every project, every person, every company. >> Everyone's a stakeholder. You're a stakeholder, too. >> And a hundred... I mean, I love how community focused you are. Obviously we're here to talk about the community. You have contributors from 187 different countries. >> Priyanka: It's one of the things I'm the most proud of. >> Savannah: It's... Yeah. It gives me all the feels as a community builder as well. >> Priyanka: Yeah. >> What an accomplishment and supporting community members in those different environments must be so dynamic for you and the team. >> Absolutely, and it behooves us to think globally in how we solve problems. Even when we introduce programs. My first question is, are we by accident being, let's say, default U.S. or are we being default Europe, whatever it may be because we really got to think about the whole world. >> John: It's global culture, it's a global village. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> And I think global now more than ever is so important. And, the Ukraine >> Priyanka: Yes. >> discussion on the main stage was awesome. I love how you guys did that because this is impacting the technology. We need the diverse input. Now I made a comment yesterday that it's going to make... it might slow things down. I meant as is more diversity, there's more conversations. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> But once people get aligned and committed, that's where the magic happens. Share your thoughts on the global diversity, why it's important, how things are made, how decisions are made. What's the philosophy? Because there's more to get your arms around. >> Yes, absolutely. It may seem harder or slower or whatever but once it gets done, aligned and committed, the product's better, everything's better. >> Priyanka: Yes, absolutely. I think the more people involved, the better it is for sure. Especially from a robustness resilience perspective. Because you know, as they say, sunlight makes bugs shallow. That's because the more eyes on something the faster people will solve problems, fix bugs and make, you know, look for security, vulnerability, solve all that. So especially in those areas, I think, where you want to be more resilient, the more the people, the better it is. A hundred percent. And then when it comes to direct technical direction and choosing a path, I think that's where, you know it's the role of the maintainers. And as I was saying there's only a thousand audit maintainers for 140 plus projects, right? So they are catering- >> Wow, they have a lot of responsibility. >> Right. >> Serious amount of responsibility. >> It's crazy. I know. And we have to do everything we can for those people because they are the ones who set the vision, set the direction, and then 176,000 plus contributors follow their lead. So we have... I think, the bright mechanisms of contribution and collaboration in a global way are in place. And we keep chugging along and doing better and better each year. >> What's next for you guys? You got the EU of show coming out, >> Priyanka: Correct, Amsterdam. the economy looking, I don't see your recession for technology, but that's me. I'm Polish on tech. Yeah, there's some layoffs going on, some cleaning up, overinflated expectations on valuations of startups, but I don't see this stopping or slowing down. But what's your take? >> Priyanka: Yeah, I mean, as I said in my keynote, right? Open source usage soars in times of turmoil and financial turmoil is one example of that. So we are expecting growth and heavy growth this year, next year and onwards. And in fact, going back to the whole maintainer journey, now is a time there's even more pressure on them and companies as they manage their, you know, workforces and prioritization, they really need to remember they're building products off of open source. They are... This is open sources on which what their business realize, whether they're a vendor or end user and give maintainers a space time to work on what they need to work on. >> Yeah. They need a little work-life balance. I mean the self-care there, I can't even imagine the complexity of the decision matrix in their mind. Speaking of that, and obviously you... Culture must be a huge part of how you lead these teams. How do you approach that as leader? >> I think the number one... So the foundation is a very small set of staff, just so you know. >> Savannah: I was actually... Let's tell the audience, how many people are on the team? >> Priyanka: You know, it's actually a difficult question because we have folks who like spin up and down and we have matrix support from the Linux Foundation, but about 30 people in total are dedicated to CNCF at any given time. >> Savannah: Wow. >> But compared... >> Savannah: You all do hard work. >> Yes. >> Savannah: You're doing great. I am impressed. >> It's a flat organization. >> It's pretty flat. >> Seriously, it's beautiful. >> It's actually in some ways very similar to the projects and there the, you know, contribution communities there where it's like everyone kind of like steps up and does what needs to be done, which is wonderful and beautiful, but with the responsibility on our shoulders, it's definitely a balancing act. So first off, it is, I ask everyone to have some grace for the staff. They are in a startup land with no IPO on the other side of the rainbow. They're doing it because they love love, love this community and technology so much. >> John: Yeah. Yeah, and then also they're acknowledging that nobody in open source wants to see a bureaucracy. >> Priyanka: Right. >> I mean, everyone see lean, efficient. >> Savannah: Yeah, absolutely John. It's great. It's a great point. And and I think that it's just... It's amazing what passionate people can do if given the opportunity. Let's talk a little bit about the literal event that we're at right now. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> Theme today, building for the road ahead. >> Priyanka: Yes. >> What was the inspiration for that? >> Detroit. (group laughs) We're in Detroit, people drive here. >> Savannah: In case you didn't know, cars have been made in this city. >> Motor city. >> It's everywhere being here in this city, which is awesome. >> But you know, it did... There was of course a geographical element but it also aligns with where we're at, right? >> Savannah: Yeah. >> We're building for the road ahead, which frankly given the changes going on in the world is a bumpy road. So it's important to talk about it. And that's what the theme was. >> And how many folks have shown up... This is a totally different energy from Los Angeles last year. I'm sure we can both agree. Everyone was excited last year, but this is an order of magnitude. >> Yes. >> How many folks do you think are milling around? >> Yeah, it's much more than double of Los Angeles. We are close to 8,000. >> Savannah: That's amazing. And it's so... You're absolutely right. The energy is just... >> Savannah: Way up. >> It's so good. People are enjoying themselves. It's been lovely. >> That's great. So you're feeling good? You're riding the high? >> Congratulations. >> Awesome. >> Yeah, thank you. I mean, I'm a little bit of a zombie right now. (group laughs) >> You don't look it, we wouldn't know. Nobody knows. They don't know. >> If you want to take a break, We got 12 interviews tomorrow. (Savannah and Priyanka laughing) You can co-host with us. We'd love to have you. >> Exactly. You're welcome anytime. Welcome anytime, Priyanka. >> Well thank you. But no, it's been such a wonderful show and you folks are part of the reason you say everybody here is contributing to the awesomeness. >> John: Yep. >> You're part of it. Look at your smiley faces. >> John: And Lisa Marty is over there. Lisa's over there. >> Yes! >> Say hi to Lisa and team. >> Yes, the team is awesome. >> Guys, thank you for your support for theCUBE. We really appreciate it. We enjoy it a lot. And we love the community. Thank you. >> Yes. Thank you for your support for CloudNative. >> Thank you. >> One last thing I just want to point out, because it's not always it happens in this industry. The women outnumber the men on this stage right now. >> John: Proud of that? >> And I know the diversity and inclusion is a priority for CNCF. >> Priyanka: Top priority. >> Yeah. Can you tell us a little bit more about that? >> Yes. It is something at the forefront of my mind, no matter what we do. And it's because I have such great role models. You know, when I was just a participant in the ecosystem, Dan Conn was leading the foundation and he took it so seriously to always try to uplift people from a diverse backgrounds and bring those faces into CloudNative. >> Savannah: Yes. >> And he made a serious lasting impact. >> John: Yes. >> And I am not going to let that go to waste. It's not going to be me who drops the ball. (group laughs) >> We're behind you all the way. >> Right? >> We see improvement over here. >> We got your back. >> I mean, even from an attendance perspective on stage I feel like you've done just an outstanding job with the curation and representation. I don't say that lightly. It really matters to me. But even in the audience looking around, it's so refreshing. Even it sounds silly. The shirts are more fitted. >> It's not silly. >> There's different types of shirts, and I mean, you know how it is. We've been in this industry long enough. >> It's a shirt you want to wear. >> Savannah: Exactly. And that's the whole point. I absolutely love it. Have we announced a location for KubeCon North America 2023, yet? >> It's Chicago. >> Savannah: Exciting! >> Yes. >> Savannah: All right. So we'll be seeing you >> Midwest. >> not that far away. >> This is the first time I've said this publicly, I just realized, It's Chicago, people. >> The scoop, yay! >> Oh, I feel so lucky we got to break the scoop. I was learning from John's lead there and I'm very excited. Amsterdam, Chicago. It's going to be absolutely >> I'll get my hotel now. >> Fantastic. >> Yes. >> Smart move. Everybody listen to him. >> Yeah, right? Especially after Detroit. It's actually not a... It's not a bad move. Priyanka, is there anything else you'd like to say to folks? Maybe they're thinking about coming or contributing to the ecosystem? >> Priyanka: Yes. Anyone and everyone can and should contribute and join us. The maintainers are holding us all up. Let's rally to support them. We have more and more programs to do that. As you know, we did ContribFest here this week which was the first time. So we will help you get involved so you're not on your own. So that's my number one message, which is anyone and everyone, you're welcome here. We'll make sure you have a good time. So just come. >> Okay. Please do it. >> I can tell you that Priyanka is not blowing smoke. I feel very welcome here. This community has welcomed me as a non-technical, so I think you're absolutely preaching the truth. Priyanka, thank you so much for being here with us today on the show, for helping herd the cats and wrangle the brilliant minds that make CNCF possible. And honestly for just bringing your energy and joy to the entire experience. John, thank you for hanging out with me. >> I'm glad I can contribute in a small way. >> I was going to say... I was going to say thank you for founding theCUBE so that we could be here in this little marriage and collaboration can be possible. And thank all of you for tuning in to theCUBE here, live from Detroit, Michigan. My name is Savannah Peterson. I am thrilled to be sharing this content with you today and I hope to see you for the rest of our interviews this afternoon. (gentle upbeat music)

Published Date : Oct 27 2022

SUMMARY :

meat of the conference. the OG and been in the And the reason I brought it, actually, How are you feeling right now? You know, the first one we did, I could sense the ease in the attendees. Because the community's changed but also at the same time it feels like Kubernetes is mainstream, Savannah: That feels just a lot of action. to support the project in, you know, and room for innovation at the same time And also projects You're starting to see formation, almost the harvesting of that hard work. Priyanka: Yes, I do think I genuinely have not seen this before. So, absolutely right. You get to see these 140 plus projects. The excitement is back in the ecosystem. And I think the maintainer group, And I do think there's as I like to call them. the CNCF marketing supports. of the ecosystem when you I've never seen this much news. Savannah: That was a lot of news. flow even from the CNCF. What's your reaction to the news flow? I think it's market proof, And I think that, I hope that you had a board meeting today. And I am curious What are the priorities on the executive team to make sure in the said meeting that You got a lot of balls in the air. You have how many stakeholders? You're a stakeholder, too. talk about the community. Priyanka: It's one of the It gives me all the feels as for you and the team. and it behooves us to think globally it's a global village. And I think global now more I love how you guys did that What's the philosophy? the product's better, everything's better. That's because the more eyes on something set the direction, and then the economy looking, And in fact, going back to I can't even imagine the complexity So the foundation is a many people are on the team? from the Linux Foundation, I am impressed. and there the, you know, Yeah, and then also they're acknowledging And and I think that it's just... building for the road ahead. We're in Detroit, people drive here. Savannah: In case you didn't know, being here in this city, But you know, it did... in the world is a bumpy road. but this is an order of magnitude. We are close to 8,000. And it's so... It's so good. You're riding the high? I mean, I'm a little bit You don't look it, we wouldn't know. If you want to take a break, You're welcome anytime. and you folks are part of the Look at your smiley faces. John: And Lisa Marty is over there. And we love the community. Thank you for your happens in this industry. And I know the diversity Can you tell us a little It is something at the And I am not going But even in the audience looking and I mean, you know how it is. And that's the whole point. So we'll be seeing you This is the first time It's going to be absolutely Everybody listen to him. or contributing to the ecosystem? So we will help you get involved Please do it. I can tell you that contribute in a small way. and I hope to see you

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
PriyankaPERSON

0.99+

SavannahPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Priyanka SharmaPERSON

0.99+

Dan ConnPERSON

0.99+

Savannah PetersonPERSON

0.99+

DetroitLOCATION

0.99+

Priyanka SharmaPERSON

0.99+

CNCFORGANIZATION

0.99+

LALOCATION

0.99+

ChicagoLOCATION

0.99+

Lisa MartyPERSON

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

ArgoORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

ValenciaLOCATION

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

three daysQUANTITY

0.99+

12 interviewsQUANTITY

0.99+

140 plus projectsQUANTITY

0.99+

Los AngelesLOCATION

0.99+

BrendanPERSON

0.99+

Detroit, MichiganLOCATION

0.99+

first questionQUANTITY

0.99+

Linux FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jaime Robles, Casey's General Stores | Coupa Insp!re 2022


 

(upbeat music) >> Good afternoon from Las Vegas. Lisa Martin, at The Cosmopolitan, here on day two of theCUBE's coverage of Coupa Inspire 2022. I'm excited to be joined by one of Coupa's many successful customers, Jaime Robles joins me, the chief procurement officer at Casey's General Stores. You're going to be talking about building a technology hub with source-to-pay and interconnecting ecosystem platforms. Welcome, Jaime. >> Thank you, Lisa. It's a pleasure to be here today in this week, hearing about Coupa and all the fabulous things that we can do around technology. >> Coupa is amazing, and in terms of their innovation, I don't know if you had a chance to see the Keynote this morning, but the slides that Raja showed with just the arrow going up and to the right. Talk to us a little bit about Casey's General Stores. This is the U.S's fourth largest convenience store retailer. But just for the audience who may not know, give us a background. >> So, just a little bit about Casey's. So, Casey's is, as you said, one of the largest convenience store chains out there. We got more than 2,500 locations in 16 states in the Midwest in the U.S. And just out of curiosity, we are the fifth largest pizza company as well. >> Lisa: Is that right? >> We make a great pizza and our guests love it. So, we are in three businesses. We are in convenience store, we are in fuel, and also we are in the food business, because we got a kitchen inside every single store that we got out there. So, for us it's been a fabulous journey with procurement, because we came to the company, joined the company two years ago in the middle of pandemic, and the whole idea was to build the procurement function from the ground up. Casey's didn't have a formal procurement function. So, pretty much, all the spend was done by the functions, by themselves, but no formal process, no technology, no platforms, nothing; very old school. And we came here to build a foundation and build, as I call it, a procurement tech house. >> A procurement tech house. So, talk to me, so I know that Casey's dates back to 1959, and what you described sounds like a lot of paper-based, manual processes; technology really wasn't in the mix. Is that what attracted you to take the role going, "I want to bring technology and build this powerhouse"? >> Yes, that was amazing. So, over my career, I've been doing this for several companies, such as in the past, in Phillips, G, and recently, with Walmart. And then, what attracted me for this opportunity was, well, everything is paper. Everything is manual. There's nothing digital in this company. There's no team, there's no sourcing, no process, no policies. It's like building everything from the ground up. So, it was very attractive. It's huge opportunities for the company, and we were going through this massive transformation to digitize the company all across the operations. So, procurement wasn't the core of those strategies for the CEO of the company, and that's what the opportunity lies. He was like, "How do we move from manual transactions to all this digital world?" and where, now everything is frictionless, that we move from 80%, 85%, that it was all manual. Now we are plus 65%, everything is digital now in the company, and just within one year of moving all over. So, the savings, the cost, the, the leakage, all the waste on the processes that we have, is just amazing, after one year. >> Sounds like the company had a cloud, a digitization strategy, brought you on board to help make that a reality for procurement. So, the appetite was there at Casey's from a cultural perspective, it wasn't battling uphill to get folks to go, "Let go of the paper. Let's go to Coupa." >> Yeah, that's the truth. So, it was the whole digital transformation for the company, not only on the procurement, spend side, but all the process in the company. So, as COVID hit our stores and the whole world, right? So, we had to move into more digital ordering, into more digital transaction, into more how my guests can interact with my stores without going to the stores, how they can order from the app, how they can get their food directly to their house, and all this stuff. And procurement was right there, hand to hand, as part of those strategies from the very beginning. And we were, I will say, very lucky to be on time to make all those digital transformations for the company, so when the COVID really hit, we were ready and prepared to take over. >> That's good, being ready and prepared. Oh my gosh. But some of the few people I've talked to. Talk to me about the core technology requirements that you had for the right BSM solution, and why Coupa ticked all those boxes. >> Yeah. So for us, it was one of the most important ones is as I said, bring the digital across the whole source to pay. Another big element for us, it was, how do we bring transparency into the process? How do we bring transparency on how much we pay, how do we spend our money, Which areas, which categories? We built a model in cases that are called, it's a self-service model. And this self service model is, I put the technology in its core, which is Coupa, and I give my users and my internal stakeholders all the power to take those decisions. So, now they can see how much they spend in different categories, with different suppliers, for the preferred vendors, what type of contracts do we have? And how do we manage that spend, versus the budget, as well? They have all that ability to take those decisions, and they don't need a procurement team. As I like to call, in my couple of speaker notes during this week, we like to make procurement invisible. We are in the back, they don't see us. And they got all the power to use the technology out there to do the job for us. >> Transparent, but empowered at the same time. >> Exactly, exactly. That's what we want, moving forward for this company. And I believe that is the vision that we got in the procurement 2.0. >> Procurement 2.0. Talk to me about some of the solutions that you implemented. You talked about source-to-pay, but give us kind of an idea if you double click on that, and then we'll kind of unpack ` what you talked about on your sessions. >> Yeah, pretty much, for Coupa, we implemented the whole source to pay. So, from sourcing, procurement, invoicing and payment. So, we implement all that at the core of the Coupa. I believe in an ecosystem of procurement technologies that are interconnected with Coupa, to interact for other needs, like contract lifecycle management, tail spend management, TNE, and some others that we're going after. Like, now for us, is going after supplier data hub, which for us is very important also to get it right. And that procurement ecosystem of different technologies connected is going to give us the ability to move faster, to be more lean and to have better data and technology accessible for the team that is in charge of procurement, to operate under that environment. >> You mentioned a few minutes ago that, when the pandemic hit, Casey's was ready, from a digital perspective. I imagine that was a huge advantage, going into such unknown times that we're still kind of in. >> Well, when I say ready, it's like, we were ready to go, and we were on the fly, implementing everything, and what the pandemic did is to accelerate all this. So, as many companies did, we were already in the process of going this direction, and when the pandemic start hitting, we accelerate everything, and we made it happen. So, we went live in three, four months, and a year later, we were completely live since we joined the company, and we were start seeing all this paying coming to ours. So, 18 months later, we are pretty much hitting best in class levels in terms of transactional, operational, tactical, savings, visibility, spend, transparency, risk management. Now we're going to take it to the next level of the maturity. It's like, how do we go for ESG? How do we go for supplier diversity? How do we manage risk management? Right? And all those things. >> You had a couple of presentations here at Inspire, talk to me about those, and some of the top takeaways that the audience gleaned from you. >> Yeah, one of the most important ones yesterday was about how to build a procurement organization from the ground up, or how to go through a digital transformation in procurement. That is something that has been on the topic on the procurement community for years now. Everybody talks about procurement transformation, et cetera. And I just showed to them, my journey in the companies that I've been doing this for the last two decades, across the world, in many different countries, and the things that work and the and the things that doesn't work, really. And how they need to build, for the future of procurement, a technology procurement house on the core. And that's how you operate day to day. And for us, organization was Coupa. And then on top of that, you need to build a procurement ops model, right? How you want to operate your procurement operating model. So, it's centralized, decentralized, a hybrid model. And it all depends about the type of company, the type of industry you are, how material is your organization, et cetera. And another big, big element in all your strategy is, how you're going to serve your customers, right? What type of service model do you have in place? If you're going to be like a full service mode, or you going to be in a strategic direction, or you going to be a self-service mode. And pretty much, what we have chosen as the best way to move forward in the future is, let's put the technology in the middle. Let's give the support our users need, but let them be self-service, and let's make our job invisible in the back, where we have all these sourcing events, all these beautiful negotiations, all these great deals, contracts, et cetera. So, by the time they use the technology, they know where to buy, how to buy, what's the right level, how to make it happen, and they don't need us. They can do it by their own. >> And they've got that visibility, that before, it sounds like they didn't have it at all. >> Exactly, so now we know how much we spend, where do we spend, and where are the opportunities? Where are some gaps that we can go after, as well? And I think one of the most important aspects in these transformations that many of my colleagues are going through is, then you have a model that you can repeat year over year and evolve with the company, so it's agile and it's flexible. Because companies keep evolving. You buy business, you sell business, you acquire, you expand, you grow, and how that model is going to shape around. So, by the time you're done, it's not obsolete again. So, technology is going to keep evolving with your model, and that for me, is the key part in all this. >> Do you feel like, this is a marketing term; future-proof, and it always is one of those things that, well what does that actually really mean? Do you feel though that, what you've put in place is future-proof? That it's going to be able to grow and scale as the company changes? >> Jaime: Totally, totally. Because as I said before, we put the technology on the core. And for us, having that technology on the core, and plugging different technologies around that and sourcing around that with our amazing sourcing team, is going to evolve whatever the company needs. If we expand into different regions, we're ready. If we expand into different business types, we're ready. I believe what we need to keep evolving, as well, is, there will be new emerging technologies. There's going to be way more AI. There's going to be way more machine learning. There's going to be more predictive analytic sourcing stuff. How do we keep pulling those technologies into our platforms to keep giving us that advantage and that edge to the market? I think we have the model, and I think it's one of the most advanced procurement functions that I've seen in the industries around. >> And it sounds like you designed and deployed it really quickly, >> We did. >> especially during a global crisis. >> Yeah, we are disruptors by nature. We love change. We love speed. And that is, I will say my procurement brand. We make it happen and we make it fast. That's how we do it. We keep momentum. >> That's incredibly important. I mean, one of the things that we've learned, many things the last two years, a couple things. Access to realtime data is no longer a "nice to have." It's absolutely business critical. The patience of many people, including myself, was quite thin, the last two years. But also, every company has to be a data company. Casey's has to be a data company. If I have the ability to order from my app, or order things, I want them to know when I'm here for, what I ordered before; make my visit personalized, efficient, easy. So, that data strategy, having that data at the core, is nowadays, you have to have it. >> It is essential. We're building a data hub for the company, completely showing us all that information. As you can imagine, being in those three business, on the food industry, on the retail convenience store, and in the fuel, so data for us is our living breath every single day. And not only having the data now, it's like, what type of decisions we're taking with all this data? And how fast we are adapting to all that, in pricing, in cost, in margin and availability and inventory and logistics and transportation, and in your whole supply chain. So, that is extremely important for us. Not only having the data, but what kind of decisions we're taking with the data, and everything starts with the transparency right? Whenever you see it, you act. >> You should be able to act, but to your point, you have to have that visibility. You have to be able to see it and act on it. Talk to me about what it's like being a Coupa customer. I know how I've been to many Inspires, and I always love seeing all the customer success stories everywhere across industries. What's it like being a Coupa customer, in terms of having the ability to influence, say, the roadmap? Is that something that you're able to work on in partnership with Raj's team? >> Yeah, that's great. So, Coupa has been a great company to work with, and I know them for some years now, and not only they been able to support our vision of what we're trying to build, but at the same time they're taking many of our feedback to make Coupa better, in many of the different models. Listen, Coupa's not perfect, right? And I don't think any tool out there is going to be perfect. But being in so many different industries and with so many opportunities in different areas, they've been able to take our feedback and make those improvements for ourselves. We have so many conversations with the Coupa product development team when we were going through a transformation, asking them for things that we thought it was very valuable to have on the tool, that was in our, in our eyes, no brainer, and they were very, very fast to react and make the change. And we are, I think, one of the most lousy customers, guilty as charged about that, but we just wanted to make it better because it's a benefit of the whole community. Everything that we've been talking this week about community AI, it's amazing. All the things that we're sharing during this week, all the ideas that we are getting about things that we can do. That's amazing. That's the value. >> It's huge value. And that's that sort of flywheel of the community and the power and the insights. Last question for you. If you talk to peers, or when you talk to peers who are maybe starting their procurement digitization journey, what advice do you give them? >> Don't take a no as an answer. Make it happen. Own it. Own it. I think you need to have a vision. You need to put in strategy in place. You need to build a business case. You need to earn your seat at the table at the C-suite. But you need to own it. You cannot let the IT, function, finance community too long, and decide how you want to operate and how you want to move your function as procurement, or build how you operate. You need to own it, and you need to build a business case and you need to make it happen. You need to, yeah. To struggle with that. But if you are a hustler, as we are in cases, we are disruptors. And if you don't disrupt, it's not going to happen. >> I completely agree. Own it, make it happen. Jaime, great to have you on the program. >> Jaime: Thanks so much. >> Thanks for hearing what Casey's is doing, how you're really leading the charge, and how you owned it and made it happen. That's awesome. >> Thank you, Lisa. Thank you for being here. >> Thanks. For Jaime Robles, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching theCUBE's coverage day two, Coupa Inspire 22, from Las Vegas. Join me with my next guest, coming up shortly. (lighthearted upbeat music)

Published Date : Apr 6 2022

SUMMARY :

Jaime Robles joins me, the all the fabulous things This is the U.S's fourth largest in the Midwest in the U.S. and the whole idea was to build and what you described sounds So, the savings, the So, the appetite was there at Casey's and the whole world, right? But some of the We are in the back, they don't see us. empowered at the same time. the vision that we got Talk to me about some of the the ability to move faster, I imagine that was a huge advantage, and we were on the fly, that the audience gleaned from you. and the and the things And they've got that and that for me, is the and that edge to the market? That's how we do it. having that data at the core, and in the fuel, so data in terms of having the ability all the ideas that we are getting and the power and the insights. You need to own it, and you Jaime, great to have you on the program. and how you owned it and made it happen. Thank you for being here. Join me with my next

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JaimePERSON

0.99+

WalmartORGANIZATION

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

CoupaORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jaime RoblesPERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

85%QUANTITY

0.99+

Casey's General StoresORGANIZATION

0.99+

Casey'sORGANIZATION

0.99+

three businessesQUANTITY

0.99+

1959DATE

0.99+

a year laterDATE

0.99+

one yearQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

more than 2,500 locationsQUANTITY

0.99+

U.S.LOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

16 statesQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

18 months laterDATE

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.98+

65%QUANTITY

0.98+

two years agoDATE

0.98+

RajaPERSON

0.97+

three businessQUANTITY

0.97+

InspireORGANIZATION

0.96+

fourth largest convenience store retailerQUANTITY

0.95+

The CosmopolitanORGANIZATION

0.94+

U.SLOCATION

0.93+

day twoQUANTITY

0.93+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.91+

Coupa Inspire 2022TITLE

0.91+

CaseyORGANIZATION

0.91+

pandemicEVENT

0.9+

last two yearsDATE

0.89+

RajPERSON

0.88+

this morningDATE

0.88+

last two yearsDATE

0.87+

last two decadesDATE

0.85+

few minutes agoDATE

0.85+

threeQUANTITY

0.83+

fifth largest pizza companyQUANTITY

0.83+

doubleQUANTITY

0.82+

CaseyPERSON

0.81+

COVIDTITLE

0.81+

four monthsQUANTITY

0.8+

single dayQUANTITY

0.79+

MidwestLOCATION

0.78+

coupleQUANTITY

0.74+

Phillips,ORGANIZATION

0.73+

single storeQUANTITY

0.73+

Noah Gaynor & CJ Hetheringon | Unstoppable Domains Partner Showcase


 

(bright music) >> Hello, welcome to theCUBE's presentation of the Unstoppable Domains Partner Showcase. I'm John Furrier host of theCUBE. We're here talking about the metaverse and what it all means, what it brings to the table. We've got two pioneers here in the metaverse breaking it down, doing great stuff. Both co-founders of companies, Noah Gainer, co-founder and CEO Parcel. And CJ Hetherington Co-Founder of Atlantis World, digging deep and doing all the great stuff in the Midwest. Chill and thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Thank you so much for having us. >> Thanks for having us. >> So, first of all, I want to say congratulations for the work you guys are doing. This is one of the biggest waves we've seen coming on. It's a changing user expectations, it's a changing architecture, it's real technology involved, there's a lot of action. 30% of people at University of California, Berkeley are dropping out of the Computer Science program to get into Web3. This is the biggest technological change, business model change, user experience change. And we've been seeing going back multiple inflection points. This is a big deal. So the metaverse is real. Some people say, "Well, you know, it's not com..." It's coming it's just a matter of time. So let's get into it. What are you guys doing? Tell us about your company's Parcel and Atlantis World. Noah, start with you. >> Sure, so Parcel is a marketplace for virtual real estate. So you can think of something like OpenSea, which everyone is familiar with, but we solely focus on virtual land and virtual real estate in a number of virtual world, maybe part of decent land or the sandbox. So we feature those on our platform and, you know, we take it the next level with the user experience. So we have fully interactive maps. We have price estimates. You can think of it like a estimate on Zillow and in general, we're building the fully verticalized solution for virtual real estate users. And that will extend into rentals, like Airbnbing out your virtual condo or getting a mortgage on your virtual home, as well as, you know, cultivating the community around it. And especially helping empower creators and architects and builders and getting them work and getting their work on display. >> I'm looking forward to digging into that, that sounds very cool. CJ what's Atlantis world doing? What do you got going on? >> Yeah, exactly. So at Atlantis world, we're building the Web3, social metaverse by connecting Web3 with social, gaming, and education in one light web virtual world, that's accessible to everybody. So by going with actually a light web first and a pixel approach so that you can play on mobile or a really old device, because the problem with existing metaverses is that they set an incredibly high cost barrier to entry and also tech isn't necessarily readily available globally in terms of things like VR headsets and gaming PCs. Like for example, when I was in Africa, I travel a lot. If my book would break, it's not even that I couldn't necessarily afford to buy anyone, it's actually not available there. So we're ruling out a lot of the global kind of population from a metaverse experience. And we're building something which is like 3D pixel and super light weight, to kind of bridge that gap and build something which is ready to be massive up till now and onboard billions of users into Web3. So they'll all basically be using Web3 applications in a gamified way and going really hard on connecting that with social features, like voice chat and talking, getting, and virtual events and vaulting and all of that stuff. >> You know, I love what you guys are doing, you're pioneering a whole another area, but what's great about the whole crypto area, is that, since you know, 2017 onwards you saw Ethereum set the developer market started coming in strong. So you start to see that development. And now we got the metaverse. So I got to ask you guys what's the current definition of the metaverse. I mean everyone's... I mean, since Facebook changed their name to Meta, it's been a hype cycle and everyone's like, "Woh..." First of all, you know why they did that. But they're actually putting a lot of DAO in this. This is a wave, we talked about that. But what is the metaverse? How do you describe it? Why is it relevant? Virtual real estate, that sounds cool. What does this all come together? Explain it for the people out there that might not be getting it right. >> Yeah, I feel like for me, the critical difference between an ordinary gamer, what one might think of as game and a metaverse is actually Web3. For me, Web3 is metaverse. And for me it's really because Web3 enables real world utility, but inside of a virtual environment. So for example, inside of Atlantis, you might run into a DeFi bank and understand by interacting with other game characters, which are programmed to teach you about DeFi and like, what is Avel, how to deposit. And so you're actually getting a real world utility out of doing something in a virtual environment. And for me, that's what really bridges the gap into metaverse. Yeah, I'm really kind of bullish on that. (chuckles) >> Noah, what's your take? Define the current state of the definition of the metaverse? What is the metaverse? >> Yeah, to me, it's the 3D internet. And I do agree with what CJ's saying, how, you know, what makes it the most compelling and will ultimately the most successful is that addition of a blockchain and essentialized, you know, tributed ledger technology. Because you can have the closed metaverse, which nobody wants that future. And I don't believe that will be the future. you know, versus the open metaverse, which is blockchain-based, the users are the owners of the assets and the land and everything around it. And it's really foreign by the people. But I see the metaverse as just an extension of the internet we're already using today but we're going to have hardware that makes it 3D and more immersive like AR and VR. >> Yeah, I think- >> Yeah, definitely- >> Go on CJ. >> Around kind of like eight or nine months ago when we started to build Atlantis, we decided that the metaverse was a virtual world where you could live, work, play, and earn, and that's what we've been building. It started off as like building the metaverse that has DeFi and over the kind of time it's gone on our community has grown, we've started to understand the future of our product and our mission and values. It started to become the Web3 metaverse, right? And then on top of that, the Web3 social metaverse, so it's a combination of what all these things. >> You know, it's interesting. And I'm a little bit older than you guys, I wish I was your age, but when the web came along, people were saying the same thing. That the web's terrible. It's a stupid thing. It's never going to be real. And yeah, there was problems. It was slow to dial up back in the day. But yeah, now with gaming, I got to say, I had to look at the gaming evolution being a gamer myself, old school, I guess, but the gaming culture is proxy to what I see kind of happening in the metaverse. And let me get your reaction to that. I'm not saying directly, but you saw what gaming did, right? In game currency, some, you know, pockets of the same kind of dynamic where a lot of value is happening, the expectations were different for users. So how does the metaverse... How does gaming cross over? What's the ecosystem of metaverse? Obviously it's a cultural shift, one. Infrastructure, two. But I can just see this new generation of thinking. It's a whole nother level. Can you guys share your thoughts on that riff? >> Absolutely. Yeah, absolutely. It's like for us, we really believe that we can enable a social revolution, where workers from impoverished and remote regions can actually be onboarded into these digital player to earn economies and also learn to earn economies. So it's about leveraging Web3 and blockchain gaming, whatever actually you want to call it, to enable this revolution and actually onboard new people into a completely new working and dynamic. One of the other things we envision for Atlantis, imagine like you run around this game world and you complete quests inside of the game. And these quests basically involve talking to the non-player characters, the NPCs, which are basically pre-programmed. I don't know if anyone's ever played an MMORPG before, but it can be super fun. And they'll actually teach you how to use different crypto applications. Whether that's a DeFi bank, NFT marketplace, kind of digital asset exchange. And once you all do that, the kind of end goal in vision is that you'll be rewarded with tokens. So users will earn crypto for learning about crypto. And if anybody wants to do that right now, they can actually go to rabbithole.gg. It's a different project to Atlantis, but they building learn to earn, and you go on you complete quests and interact with different crypto applications. And it's so crucial for onboarding. And yeah, it's going to be really powerful, the kind of revolution that play to earn and learn to earn will enable. >> I'll check out the rabbihole.gg sounds awesome. What's your take on the reaction to that riff on this convergence of culture tech, gaming, vibe that's kind of divine the metaverse what's your take on that, Noah? >> Yeah, I mean... I think gaming will be the on ramp for maybe the first billion people, you know, into blockchain. It's something people already do and are already paying for, and they now have the opportunity to get paid to play. So the incentives are extremely strong and I think that will be a great way to usher people in, teach 'em about blockchain without realizing that they're using blockchain. And then once they're already in it and have already used it, then it becomes much more natural to user than other applications. >> It's funny, people always talk about, "Oh, user experience!" You know, expectations drive experience, right? If you expect something and if they're used to gaming, I see the great, great call out there, good point. Well, let me ask you guys a question, 'cause I think this is comes out a lot in terms of like the market shifts and metaverse, as an old expression, "Great markets pull the products out of companies or out of the industry." What organic growth have you guys seen in the metaverse that's been either a surprise or a natural evolution of just success and just growth, because the market's hungry for this and it is relevant. It's new, what's pulling out? What's coming out of the organic aspect of the metaverse? >> I think a lot of art and architecture and design. And, you know, it's empowering a lot of independent creators and allowing 'em to stretch their skills in a way that they maybe couldn't do before, but now can do and get compensated for. Like, we see really see the rise of the creator coming in the next couple of years in the open metaverse and finally they will be the ruling class. They won't get the short end of the stick, which artists have for... I mean all the time. >> Yeah, some of the wall street bet skies in the same way, feel the same way. CJ, What's your take on... What's getting pulled out on the organic execution growth of the interactions and metaverse evolution? >> Of course, yeah. I would, first of all love to go back to the previous point on gaming and just kind of like, definitely agree with what Noah said. And the thing is that gaming is 3.4 billion user market, and they're typically an experimental by nature people and group of users, right? So it's definitely a huge onboarding opportunity for teaching users about Web3 and using Web3 in a gamified way and making that kind of inherently fun and engaging. And again, in terms of organic growth, Web3 is incredible for that. We place a huge emphasis on, I think, collaborate versus compete and try to enable network effects for everybody who is involved in Atlantis and becoming part of our fast growing ecosystem. Like we have eight blockchain, more than 10 DeFi apps, like Aave, Yearn, Balanced, 1inch, Perpetual. All of the DAOs like The Exile, MetaCartel, lobsterdao, PizzaDAO, all of the NFT communities. Like we're actually building a yacht for bought yacht club on the beach in Atlantis. So that's fun. But yeah, we grew our community. We're very early stage still. We've been building only for eight or nine months, but we grew our community to like 20 to 30,000 community members across social channels. And we recently raised over a million dollars from our community and we're fully bootstrapped and taken no private money. So the ability to actually do that and to coordinate both kind of community efforts and fundraising and resources is really testament to Web3 and what it's becoming in the community aspect of that. And also its future and the kind of dawn and domination of the Metaverse. >> Well, I got to say, I just got to give you props for that. I think that fundraising dynamic is a real entrepreneurial new thing, that's awesome. You've got active community vote with their contribution and whether it's money and or other value, right? You got social value. This is the whole thing about the metaverse, there's a new community culture going next level here. >> We believe in community and we believe in Web3. And we know we don't understand why most leading metaverses are focusing fully on huge IP and actually ignoring Web3. So we're actually trying to build the infrastructure layer for Web3 applications and for Web3 driven utility inside of the metaverse. And what we mean by that imagine that any developer or any project or any team or any company could occupy a plot for free inside of the metaverse, customize it by branding and then effectively set up shop, whether that's a Web3 integration, so it's a DeFi Bank, or it's an exchange. Or whether that's an NFT marketplace or a music venue or a coworking space. We're really excited about that. And we really believe we've designed the value capture mechanism for virtual land in the metaverse and we're approaching it in a different way to land in the real world. >> That's awesome. Well, let's get that infrastructure conversation, unstoppable domains obviously there having the partner showcase here. You guys are partners. This NFT kind of like access method is a huge... I love it by the way. I think it's phenomenal. I love the value there, but it's also digital identity and it's distributed naming. So you kind of got this enablement vibe, you got solve a problem. How is it working with you guys? Take us through what does unstoppable metaverse... Why does unstoppable matter to the metaverse? >> Yeah, unstoppable is very great mostly for identity and having a kind of crush chain identity inside of the metaverse and just kind of in Web3 in general. And unstoppable, we enable log in with unstoppable. So if you have, for example, an unstoppable domain which is like a human readable kind of crypto wallet address, but you can also do some incredible, stuff with it, and there is a lot of fun and exciting utility, effectively, like if you would have, I don't know, like unstoppable.dao you would be able to use that to log in to the Atlantis metaverse and it would represent some of your identity and social graph in game with your peers. >> Awesome, Noah, what's your take on the unstoppable angle on this? >> Yeah, I mean, it makes it social. So, instead of you can have a feed, you know, something we're thinking about at Parcel is like a feed of all the real estate transactions, and you could follow certain people, you can follow your friends and see a feed of everything that your friends are doing in English or human readable terms that are not just like a wallet address. So, that's obviously a big one and they're also giving people more options in terms of, naming and top level domains if you want to be something.wallet or .nft, or hopefully eventually .metaverse- >> John: Yes. >> Will help expand that ecosystem much more. In addition to like on our... Like backend being able to capture email when they login and to provide better marketing for our users. >> What would you guys say to other metaverse partners looking for work with unstoppable domains for their login and digital identity, what would you recommend? >> It doesn't make sense to- >> I believe- >> Connect with the best DAO and integrate that if you want to keep shipping stuff for your community and keeping it exciting and engaging and enabling user choice in how they choose to display their identity in virtual environments. >> Yeah, there's practically no downside and plenty of upside, again, having those users who are already using unstoppable domains quickly, you know, log into your site and plug in. >> All right. That's awesome. Good stuff with unstoppable. I got to ask you guys give an example of on your products, I love the metaverse progression. I love the pioneering work you guys are doing. And again, the funding things are different. The user expectations are different. The technology experience are different. Billions of people going to be in enabled for it. What are the cool things you guys got going on? CJ, we were talking before we came on camera about the tree thing you got going on. Take us through some of the things that are exciting that people may not know about or may know about. What should they pay attention to share, share some insight? >> Yeah, of course. So one of the fun things, actually that we're building on that on these sites together with our full team and also some outside contributors from the community and two kin protocol, which is a regenerative finance protocol. And I'll get into that a little bit in a minute. Effectively what we're actually doing is planting a carbon capturing virtual forest inside of the metaverse that will in future also be bio diverse. So how we're approaching that is imagine that you can plant NFT trees inside of the metaverse, providing that your will deposit X amount of kind of USD stablecoin or Ether or some digital asset. You can actually use that to deposit inside of the tree. And we will use some, probably something like super fluid, which is like a kind of smart projecting infrastructure platform. And we all essentially enable every single second funds being sent from the contract and actually purchasing real world carbon credits. So legitimate, you know, government bags to carbon credits from the voluntary kind of public market that have actually been bridged on chain, transformed into a crypto asset, and they will be locked away inside of these trees inside of game forever. And in future, we also hope to have like user on animals, roaming the great forest of Atlantis, which will have biodiversity and endangered species credit, locked inside. And we hope to support a variety of different kind of sustainable assets and things like that to really populate this ecosystem. >> So it's you're doing climate change good for real, as well as rendering it as an asset for everyone to see and enjoy. >> Absolutely. And for me, that's what makes the metaverse the metaverse, that's what I talked about. It's how Web3 enables the metaverse to cross over into our real world, ordinary life from URL to IRL and actually provide some incredible positive impact for all of humanity on the planet. >> And Noah, you have some action going on there. I mean, I would be like, "oh, virtual real estate, isn't it unlimited real estate?" But when you have users come together, this value, we've seen this in gaming, what are some of the cool things you got going on over there at Parcel? >> Yeah, I think one thing that stands out, which maybe not enough people are thinking about are AR virtual world. So, right now a lot of people are focused on the VR types, central and sandbox and, and Atlantis, but there very well may be a billion people using augmented reality before there are a billion using virtual reality just because of the nature of the hardware development and apple may come out with their AR headset by the end of the year. So there are a few projects there they've taken the real world to map and Parcel it out into hexagons, and you can actually buy that, and you own that, that piece and you can put your own custom content there. And on that social impact point, we have heard about a few projects that are trying to use it for good. And like one project is bought up some land in the Amazon rain forest and some of the proceeds go to conservation of the rain forest. So, you know, we're all about using blockchain for good and right, coming together as a globe. >> I can't wait to see the commercial real estate division of your group with all the work from, a remote coming on. Guys, great stuff you got going on, again, you guys are pioneering an area that is coming big. It's coming strong, its got a lot of... A momentum, vitality, and energy to it. Put a plug in for your companies. Noah, we'll start with you. What's going on with Parcel, share a plug for the company. What you're looking for, do some key highlights, news, take a minute to, to give a plug. >> Sure. Yeah, great. We are the destination for virtual real estate and that extends well beyond just the buyers and sellers. That's everyone across the whole chain with property managers and property developers, but then also the builders and creators and artists, and we are working right now on aggregating the best creator directory in the metaverse. So you can think of it as a place where artists can come showcase their work and get hired. As well as just generally like bridging this knowledge gap that is much wider than we even expected. So we have our Parcel learn product coming soon, which is a fully fledged, knowledge base with education, informational content and lots of rich data. >> Where can people get involved? What's the channels? Are all channels open? Where can we find you? >> Yeah, our websites Parcel.so on Twitter, you can find us at ParcelNFT and you can link to our discord from either one of those. It's the best way to get involved. >> All right, CJ, put a plug in for the last world, I know you got a lot of action to share. >> Yeah, of course. I would love to see everybody there. Thanks so much for having us. And thanks for listening. Like I said, at the start of the call, we're building the Web3 social metaverse and we're connecting Web3 with social gaming and education, in one light web virtual world that's accessible to everybody. We're also doing some crazy stuff like planting their cabin, capturing virtual forest and all of that, and trying to be the infrastructure layer for Web3 driven real world utility inside of the metaverse. And we believe that we have designed the critical value capture mechanism for virtual learn. I we'll be sharing more all of that very soon and continuing to integrate the best apps from across the Web3 ecosystem and showcasing them at the center of Atlantis. You can go to discord.gg/atlantisworld. If you would love to learn more about us, you can go to wiki.atlantis.world. And there is some documentation now, which includes back story and team and some of our milestones and achievements so far from winning hackathons to raising grants and launching our Alpha belt, soft launching it. And we all have the public free to play coming in March. And where most active, I would say on discord and Twitter. On Twitter you can find us atlantisOx, or just search Atlantis world. And it's the first one that come up. >> All right. CJ, thank you. Noah, thanks for coming out. I really appreciate you spending the time here, and unstoppable showcase and being a partner. Again they got the great digital identity, great plug there for them here. Thanks for sharing that and thanks for sharing the time. Appreciate you guys are pioneer of some good stuff. Appreciate it. >> Thanks so much man. >> I so appreciate that. >> All right, theCUBE's unstoppable domains partner showcase. Thanks for watching. (bright music)

Published Date : Mar 10 2022

SUMMARY :

of the Unstoppable Thank you so much for the work you guys are doing. and in general, we're building the fully What do you got going on? and a pixel approach so that you can play of the metaverse. to teach you about DeFi and the land and everything around it. and over the kind of time it's gone on kind of happening in the metaverse. the kind of revolution that play to earn that's kind of divine the metaverse So the incentives are extremely strong I see the great, great coming in the next couple of growth of the interactions and domination of the Metaverse. This is the whole thing inside of the metaverse. I love the value there, inside of the metaverse and a feed of all the real and to provide better DAO and integrate that you know, log into your site and plug in. about the tree thing you got going on. forest inside of the metaverse for everyone to see and enjoy. for all of humanity on the planet. are some of the cool things and some of the proceeds share a plug for the company. in the metaverse. and you can link to our discord plug in for the last world, inside of the metaverse. thanks for sharing the time. Thanks for watching.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
NoahPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AfricaLOCATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

CJ HetheringtonPERSON

0.99+

Noah GainerPERSON

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

eightQUANTITY

0.99+

MarchDATE

0.99+

2017DATE

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AtlantisLOCATION

0.99+

Web3TITLE

0.99+

appleORGANIZATION

0.99+

two pioneersQUANTITY

0.99+

wiki.atlantis.world.OTHER

0.99+

nine monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

eightDATE

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

PerpetualTITLE

0.99+

AaveTITLE

0.99+

DeFiTITLE

0.99+

one projectQUANTITY

0.98+

over a million dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

Noah GaynorPERSON

0.98+

CJ HetheringonPERSON

0.98+

more than 10QUANTITY

0.98+

YearnTITLE

0.98+

The ExileTITLE

0.97+

CJPERSON

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

first oneQUANTITY

0.97+

Unstoppable Domains Partner ShowcaseEVENT

0.97+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.97+

PizzaDAOTITLE

0.97+

NFTORGANIZATION

0.97+

lobsterdaoTITLE

0.96+

Atlantis WorldORGANIZATION

0.96+

AtlantisTITLE

0.96+

30,000 community membersQUANTITY

0.95+

oneQUANTITY

0.95+

a billionQUANTITY

0.95+

.nftOTHER

0.95+

Billions of peopleQUANTITY

0.95+

OneQUANTITY

0.95+

EnglishOTHER

0.94+

1inchTITLE

0.93+

first billion peopleQUANTITY

0.92+

metaverseTITLE

0.92+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.91+

nine months agoDATE

0.91+

twoQUANTITY

0.91+

end of the yearDATE

0.91+

todayDATE

0.91+

FirstQUANTITY

0.9+

University of CaliforniaORGANIZATION

0.9+

next couple of yearsDATE

0.9+

BalancedTITLE

0.88+

one thingQUANTITY

0.88+

.metaverseOTHER

0.86+

MetaCartelTITLE

0.85+

AvelTITLE

0.83+

DeFi bankORGANIZATION

0.83+

billion peopleQUANTITY

0.82+

OpenSeaTITLE

0.82+

ParcelTITLE

0.82+

billions of usersQUANTITY

0.8+

3.4 billion user marketQUANTITY

0.8+

ParcelNFTORGANIZATION

0.74+

Denise Reese & Gina Fratarcangeli, Accenture | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

(soft instrumental music) >> Welcome back everyone, to theCUBE's coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. We're here in person at a live physical event with real people. Of course, it's a hybrid event. Great stuff online. Check it out on the Amazon site, as well as theCUBE zone. We've got great guests, talking about the cloud vision for getting talent in to the marketplace, in being productive and for society Accenture always great content. Denise Reese, Managing Director of the South Market Unit Lead at Accenture, AABG, which stands for "Accenture Area Business Group" and Gina Gina Fratarcangeli who is also the managing director of Midwest sales leader. Ladies, thanks for coming, I appreciate you coming on and talking about the vision of talent. >> I guess >> Thanks for having us. >> Yes, absolutely. It's a pleasure to be here. >> So, Amazon's got this dangerous goal, to train 29 million people. Maureen Lonergan came on yesterday, who I've known for a long time, doing a great job. It's hard to get the talent in. First of all, it sounds harder than it really is, that's my opinion. You know, you get some training certifications and you're up and running. So, talent's a big thing. What do you guys do? Give us the overview. >> Sure. Well, we're having a lot of activity at Accenture trying to get talent in. Across the entire country we're spending a tremendous amount of effort to do that. A couple of critical things we're doing in the Midwest is bringing in and searching for different talent streams that we haven't typically done in the past. For instance, one thing that we're doing is, we set up an apprentice program where we're reaching out into the market to find diverse talent, who aren't coming through the critical normal college path and bringing folks in like that. And we've got 1200 people that we've brought in that way, just in the Midwest. Which has been a phenomenal new talent stream for us. And supporting our inclusion and diversity. One of the other exciting things is what we call "The Mom Project", where we're intentionally working with an organization called the Mom Project, to bring women back into the workplace who may have left while they were taking care of their families and helping them get certified in all the new cloud technology and getting back to work. >> I love how you guys are going after this whole places that not everyone's looking at, because what I love about Cloud is that, it's a level up kind of opportunity where you don't really have to have that pedigree, or that big-big school. Of course, I went to a different school. So, I have a little chip on my shoulder. I didn't go to MIT, wasn't North-east but still good school. But, I mean, you could really level up from anywhere. >> Gina: That's right. >> And the opportunities with Cloud are so great. This is like a huge thing. No I'm surprised no one knows about it. >> Absolutely. I would add to that. So, we've in the South, in Georgia in particular. We've just launched an initiative with the technical college system of Georgia and AWS. So, it's a public-private partnership, where we're actually helping to set the curriculum for those students that are going through programs, through the technical colleges. It's one of the largest parts of the university system of Georgia. And, we're actually helping to frame the curriculum. And, giving folks what they need, to your point. It is an opportunity to level up. It's a great way to get talent in non-traditional spaces. It helps us to achieve our inclusion and diversity roles or goals, rather. But, then it also allows us to really continue to fill that pipeline with folks that we may not have had access to otherwise. >> Is there a best practice that you see developing in the acquisition of talent? Or enticing people to come in? Because that's just economics you know, Maureen was telling me that it was this person she was unemployed, and she got certified and she's making six figures. >> Both: Yeah. >> She's like oh my God, this is great. So, that's the Cloud growth. Is there a way to entice people? Is there a pattern? Is it more economic? Is it more, hey, be part of something. What's the data showing? >> There's definitely a war for talent out there. And so in this space we continuously hear from our clients that they can't hire enough people. So in the past, in the technology space, a lot of clients were hiring their own teams and here they just can't get the skills fast enough. So we're spending a tremendous amount of time being proactive. We started a women in Cloud organization where we're proactively reaching out to the community to bring women in, let them know that we will help them get those certifications and partnering with organizations like Women in Cloud, which is a global organization to create new funnels of talent. >> I think the women angle is great. The mom network coming out of the work for back into the workforce, because things change. Like we were talking about how Amazon just changed over the past five years now that this architectural approach is changing. So that's cool. Also we were involved in the women in data science, out of Stanford University, they have that great symposium. This is power technical women. >> Yes >> And it's got a global following. So the women networks that are developing are phenomenal. So that's not just an Accenture thing, right? That's outside of Accenture. >> I think it's a combination because I think we do a really good job inside of Accenture to create opportunities for women of various ethnicities lived experiences to be able to come together to network internally, but then also to pour some of that talent that they have into the communities where we live and we all do business as well. So I think I'm seeing definitely a two-pronged approach there. >> Let me ask you a question, I don't mean to put you on the spot, but I kind of will, Accenture's known as a pretty great firm. So working at Accenture is kind of a big deal. Does that scare people? Because if you could work at a Accenture I mean, that's good pedigree right there. So like, when you're trying to get people coming into the cloud, do they get the Accenture mojo or does it work for them? And can you share your experiences on that? >> I've been here five years and it's been a phenomenal ride for me. I've really enjoyed the fact having a female CEO, I think, and having a CEO who is so committed to diversity on all aspects, right? Her commitment is 50% diversity parody by 2025 at every level of our organization. And that doesn't happen without really intentional efforts at the entry-level and everywhere through the process to ensure that women are not only promoted, but really given the support network among all of our leaders and mentorship to be successful. And it's not just words, it's something that we're really spending a lot of time doing with intention. And that word is out in the space now, as women come in, they're loving it and they're recruiting their other women into the organization and diverse groups as well as what I'm seeing. >> And so I actually just started at Accenture in March. So I've been around eight months. I actually joined from AWS, interestingly enough. And I can tell you from my own experience, the intentionality that Gina spoke to you is it's evident at all levels. I feel like the way that I was courted to the firm was nothing short of amazing. That's another story for another day, but I feel like my being where I am, being hired in as a managing director, as an experienced hire, I think my presence is a testament to the focus that Accenture has on inclusion diversity and the equity component as well. And then also in Atlanta, we are exceptionally fortunate. We have close to 30 black and Latin X managing directors and senior managing directors out of the Atlanta office. So what we're doing there is pretty magical and it's something that I've never experienced in my 25 years. >> It's contagious I hope, the magic is contagious. >> Yeah. >> Yes, absolutely. >> And it's exciting because we're known as a management consulting business, right? So our product is the people >> That's right. >> And so there is intention from day one as to what you want from your career and setting your career plan. So everyone is given those career counselors and the expectation that someone is thinking about your business and your personal business, and what is your role today and what should your role be in two years, and what skills do you need to get there? Which is awesome, it's a lot of fun. >> It's also walking the talk too, right? I mean, Amazon here, they had a 50% women on stage. I don't know if you noticed on the keynote, they was two men and two women, 50%. Of course the United Airlines, it's got to be three. We got to get a 51%,, 'cause technically 51% So it should be three to one, but yeah, like, okay, that was cute notice but that's good. But this is real, I've been a big proponent of software development. Customers are women too that's 51%. So I think this whole representation thing has to be more real and more intentional. And so I want to ask you, how would you share the best practice of making that real from the essential playbook? What could people learn and what mistakes should they avoid? I think people who do want to try with it, but they don't know what to do. >> You know, I think get started, right. Do the work. I feel like since I started in technology, we've been having this conversation about diversity and inclusion and bringing more people into the space. And now it's time for us to just do that. And I feel like Accenture is doing that in spades. I think also again, I've been using this word. I was on a breakout panel yesterday talking about our partnership with AWS and intentionality keeps coming up. But I think also it helps to have a CEO who's creating diversity as an imperative at the most senior levels of the firm and folks are being incentivized as a result. So you've got to put the mechanisms in place to ensure that folks understand that this is not just lip service. >> That's a great point. It's not only just the people, but the mechanisms. And one of the things that I've been saying early on in the top of the interview was Cloud is an instant leveler there, because if you can be so capable so fast. So like when you start thinking about getting people in the market, producing talent, this notion of meritocracy isn't lip service, because if you have the capabilities and the people side lineup, then it truly can be like that. 'Cause your game does the talking, right. >> And we're doing it with intention at every level in the organization so much though, that every people leader, one of their metrics is the diversity. And as we look at the promotions, making sure that that parody is there, but every person who's managing people has diversity as a metric that they're being measured on. And so I think that's really critical as well as having the people who are being the advocates and being the allies and really asking the questions as the teams are getting put together. You know, my job is to review all the deals in the Midwest. And when the teams come forward, I say, "Great where are the women on the team? Who are we putting it?" We're all talking about the diversity. So when we're going to a client meeting, where are the women who are you're taking to that meeting? And if the answer is well, there's not one who's technical yet, the most senior, the most technical, well, great bring her on and use this as a training opportunity. We need to walk the walk and talk the talk and show that to our clients. >> I think that's really good. You guys are senior leaders, one can do that, demonstrate that, but also you're in the field for Accenture. You're in front of your customers. What are you seeing out there and what excites you about being in these industry? >> Yeah, I love the fact that there are so many more women in this space. I love that we're having so many women out there with intention. We've had six female CEOs do women in Cloud panel discussions with us and with our team. So you made the comment early about cloud moving so fast. That's the most exciting thing for me and the fact that it is moving at such a pace that no one client is going to be able to get the skills fast enough. They need companies like Accenture. They need companies like AWS to help them where we're leveraging all the knowledge from our own other clients and bringing that together so we can help them accelerate their development. What about you? >> Absolutely. Now I would echo that as we used to say at AWS plus one to that. But I'm really hopeful because what I'm seeing is the number of folks with my lived experience better at senior executive levels, not only within Accenture and AWS, but in our customers. And I think going back to the point that you were making earlier regarding Cloud being a level up and giving folks opportunity, folks have to be able to see a path, right? It's one thing to just get a certification and tick a box, that's great. But if you don't see a pathway to being able to utilize that in a way that allows you to move up and seeing where we are now, just as a firm, just really, really excites me that every time I get onto a call and I see another strong, amazing woman, I'm like, man, this is amazing. And it's something that... I think it's a phenomenon that I've started to see maybe within the last like five years or so. And probably even within the last two to three years, I've started to see that even more so, so that really excites me. >> Well, first of all, you guys are great. You're contagious, okay? Which is good, a good thing. I love how you brought the whole path thing because path finders was a big part of Adam's Leslie's keynote, and it must be really fun to see people taking the path that you guys are pioneering- >> We're ploughing, we're ploughing >> Yes we are. We're ploughing and you know what else we're doing? We're lifting, as we climb. That is important. I would say that, we don't have all of these amazing opportunities and blessings just to talk about what we have, but if you're not actually bringing somebody else along and giving those opportunities to folks, then it's all for not. >> You got people and the Cloud, to get them people, which is, we're humans and the mechanisms software to bring it together, magic. >> Absolutely >> Congratulations. Thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Both: Thanks for having us. >> Okay this is theCUBE, I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. You're watching theCUBE, the leader in global tech coverage from re:Invent 2021 AWS web services. Thanks for watching (soft instrumental music)

Published Date : Dec 2 2021

SUMMARY :

and talking about the vision of talent. It's a pleasure to be here. It's hard to get the talent in. and getting back to work. I didn't go to MIT, wasn't North-east And the opportunities of the university system of Georgia. in the acquisition of talent? So, that's the Cloud growth. So in the past, in the technology space, the women in data science, So the women networks that into the communities where we live I don't mean to put you on but really given the support network the intentionality that Gina spoke to you the magic is contagious. as to what you want from your career So it should be three to one, and bringing more people into the space. and the people side lineup, and show that to our clients. and what excites you about and the fact that it is And I think going back to the point and it must be really fun to and blessings just to You got people and the Thanks for coming on theCUBE. the leader in global tech coverage

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
GinaPERSON

0.99+

MaureenPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Maureen LonerganPERSON

0.99+

Gina FratarcangeliPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Denise ReesePERSON

0.99+

Gina Gina FratarcangeliPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AccentureORGANIZATION

0.99+

GeorgiaLOCATION

0.99+

AtlantaLOCATION

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

51%QUANTITY

0.99+

MarchDATE

0.99+

2025DATE

0.99+

United AirlinesORGANIZATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

25 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

AABGORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

1200 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

two womenQUANTITY

0.99+

Stanford UniversityORGANIZATION

0.99+

two-prongedQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

two menQUANTITY

0.99+

CloudORGANIZATION

0.99+

Accenture Area Business GroupORGANIZATION

0.98+

29 million peopleQUANTITY

0.98+

six figuresQUANTITY

0.97+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.97+

six femaleQUANTITY

0.96+

todayDATE

0.96+

The Mom ProjectORGANIZATION

0.95+

MidwestLOCATION

0.95+

FirstQUANTITY

0.94+

around eight monthsQUANTITY

0.93+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.91+

one thingQUANTITY

0.9+

day oneQUANTITY

0.89+

30 blackQUANTITY

0.89+

LatinOTHER

0.87+

past five yearsDATE

0.84+

InventEVENT

0.82+

theCUBETITLE

0.82+

twoQUANTITY

0.8+

Mom ProjectORGANIZATION

0.75+

re:Invent 2021EVENT

0.74+

Edith Harbaugh, LaunchDarkly | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

(upbeat music) >> Hey everyone and welcome back to the CUBE's continuous live coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. continuous live coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. Lisa Martin here with David Nicholson. We have two live sets going on, we've got two remote sets, over 100 guests working with AWS and it's a massive ecosystem of partners, really digging into the next decade of cloud innovation and we're pleased to welcome back one of our CUBE alumni, Edith Harbaugh, CEO, and co-founder of LaunchDarkly. We're going to be talking about a blueprint for continuous modernization, Edith, it's great to have you, thanks for coming. >> Thanks for having me. >> So I was doing some research, you guys raised 200 million in series D in August, just a few months ago, that new funding tripled your valuation to 3 billion up more than 3x from the previous funding rounds, so rocket ship. >> Edith: Yeah. >> I also noticed you guys are on the Forbes Cloud 100 2nd year on the list, you jumped dramatically from 100 in 2020 to 47 this year, talk to us about all the innovation and acceleration that's going on at LaunchDarkly. >> Yeah, well, it's, it's great to be here, you know, I'm the CEO and co-founder and we started seven years ago in 2014 and what we were doing back then was a really new field, like I actually came up with the name feature management, just to describe what we were doing and it was this idea that you could release features to different people at different times, which sounds really simple, but it really allows you to have valves to different populations that you can then turn something on, turn something off, run a beta, do personalization and then if something's going wrong out on the field quickly and easily, turn it off. >> So as an engineer, as a long standing engineer, what were the things that really frustrated you, that you thought this, this is missing, we've got to focus on this. >> Oh my gosh, so, I was an engineering manager, I actually do a podcast too called To Be Continuous just about all the bad things I saw happen, the worst thing you could do is, is build something that nobody wants, which is really frustrating, so I think a lot of continuous delivery came out of the urge to just get stuff out quicker. The flip side of that is that if you moved too fast, a release can be catastrophic. We used to call them the push and pray release because you push stuff out and then you're just crossing your fingers that nothing breaks because if something breaks it's extremely stressful. Your mind starts flooding with endorphins and hormones, your heart rate increases and you sometimes make even worse decisions, so what LaunchDarkly and feature management allow you to do is push it out to who you want and if something is going wrong, you could turn it off without a redeploy, if things are going right, you can continue to push it out. >> And when you say feature management, you're talking about, you're talking about a level of granularity that is finer than a release version. that is finer than a release version. >> Edith: Yeah. How do you do that? >> Our customers do it, so we provide a platform where our customers and we have 2,500 worldwide, everything from IBM and Atlassian, down to like three person startups, they decide how to encapsulate a feature >> David: Okay. >> So they could push it to who they want, so, so there's a lot of really neat use cases. >> So knowing that you're providing them with the valves. >> Edith: Yes. Then they can- think differently about how they're actually developing in anticipation of delivering encapsulated features, as opposed to, here's your new release. >> Edith: Exactly. >> Okay. >> Exactly, so we have some customers who've used LaunchDarkly to actually move to the cloud. So like TrueCar was running their own data centers and they wanted a way to start moving all of that data center traffic into AWS, so they could use LaunchDarkly to manage that traffic flow and do it in a controlled way instead of just one quick switch. >> I was looking at that case study of TrueCar, they migrated 500 websites to AWS without downtime and deploying 20x per day, which is up from 1x a week, that's a massive change. >> Yeah, I think really what we give our customers is confidence that if you know that you can always have control over stuff with feature management, you actually move much quicker. You can, you can move 20 times a day if you know that if something goes wrong, you can always turn it off, you have much more confidence. >> Where are your, you having customer conversations? I know you, you coined to the term feature management, I'd love to know a bit more contextually about the evolution from feature flags to feature management and where are those customer conversations happening? are they kind of down in the technical ways? are they more higher level? given the fact that we're in such a, still a, such a state of flux with COVID? >> Yeah, so we, we didn't invent feature flagging like the smart companies like Amazon, Facebook, Netflix have been doing feature flagging for decades now, it was always a secret sauce of this is how they could manage their own functionality. What LaunchDarkly did was kind of changed it to feature management about doing it where any other customer also had the same set of tools and platforms and also on top of that things like a workflow, scheduling, integrations. So that for example, a developer could develop something and then give the keys to the product manager, say product manager, you get to, you get to run the beta now. >> So putting, putting more control back in the hands of the folks that are, that really are touching and feeling and smelling the product. >> Yeah or customer support, you know, >> Yeah or customer support, you know, if something is going wrong in the field, instead of having to wait for an engineer to fix a bug customer support could just turn it off. >> So I'm curious about, you know, when we talk about it's a, this, this sort of dovetails with something that was discussed in the keynote today, out of the gate, Adam comes out and he's talking about microprocessor technology. Now in the era of cloud, generally people would say, that stuff doesn't matter, right? It's all about the feeling of being in the cloud and the flame, you know, the, the, the field of wheat blowing in the wind and it's a feeling that you get, it's really interesting what you're doing under the covers, but who is the, who is the audience? Who, who buys this? Because I can imagine some in the engineering, on the engineering side of things, feeling like maybe they're giving up some control, but really you're giving them more tools, but is it business people who are demanding this? how, how do you go to market? >> Yeah, so it's really interesting because our core audience is developers and VP of engineering, like they love the platform. Like our Net Promoter Score is extremely high, engineers say like, this gave me my weekends back because if a bug happens I don't have to come in. >> David: Okay so they get it. >> They get it. This isn't being pushed down- from executives that don't understand the technology. >> No, I mean, a typical thing is a developer's, like, I need this to do my job and then the business people say, well, if the developers are happy, we're happy, you know, it's, it's a developers world now, you know, they're hard to hire, you have to have them and if you have anything that will make their job easier and them happier, why wouldn't you buy it? >> That's a big facilitator, so you mentioned a high, high NPS, high Net Promoter Score, we, we talk with Amazon folks about their their focus on the customer and their customer obsession if you will, that everything starts backwards, we start from the customer, 2,500 customers in such a short time period, we talked about the funding, I imagine culturally there's similarities there, if one of the things that you're able to confidently give your customers is that confidence in LaunchDarkly. >> Yeah, you know, one of the happiest parts of my job is visiting customers, you know, I, my co-founder and I personally visited, I think the first 10 or 20 customers and if they had a bug, if they wanted something, and if they had a bug, if they wanted something, we built it. And I love going on customer sites, cause it's. And I love going on customer sites, cause it's. >> When they're telling you that you gave them their weekend back. >> Edith: Yeah. >> Huge. >> That's, yeah, that.- that's not an insignificant thing when you think about what people do with their weekends, you know, so? >> Yeah, you know, it, it feels really good to have customers say, like this literally has changed the way they built software for the better. >> I can't imagine this, you know, with everything that's happened in the last 22 months with the acceleration to cloud, but all these massive pivots by businesses, in every industry just to survive in the beginning, were an advantage, something like LaunchDarkly is for those organizations, so you have to move really, really quickly and keep changing direction to kind of figure out how do we stay afloat and now how do we thrive in that, that this has probably been a real lifesaver for a lot of organizations. >> Yeah, I mean, we've seen like a ten year roadmap at our customers compressed into a month, like we had a, a retail chain in the Midwest that was thinking about doing in-store pickup and then when COVID hit, they're like, okay, this changed from a, maybe to a, we need to have this to stay afloat and now, now they can help people pick up, same with, same with restaurants having a mobile app to do delivery or pickup, it used to be when we'll get to that next year, now it's something that you have to have. >> Oh yeah. >> Because if, if you're going to go get coffee and one place has a mile long line and their place has an app, which one are you going to pick? >> So, what do people do that don't have this capability? This, I mean, this might sound like a completely naive question, I know a lot about a lot of things, so I'm okay looking dumb sometimes, it's how I learn, so I'm okay looking dumb sometimes, it's how I learn, but seriously, if you don't have these valves, then aren't you doomed then aren't you doomed to releases that are going to be panic inducing. >> It's really, it's really painful, like, I mean, that's, that's the way I used to, to release, you know, I remember it, like you're released and you would have tried to have caught all the bugs, but it would go out and if something happened, you had to fix it on the fly and even if you have a really good deployment process, that's 20 minutes, maybe two hours. >> David: Sure, and, and. >> Which, which if you're a mobile app, it could be a business killer. >> Yeah, well we're here at AWS reinvent, I mean, how does, how does this dovetail with this, the AWS mission to migrate and modernize into the cloud native world? we're talking about cloud native, you know, development and operations that you're involved with, so there's obviously a synergy there, but why specifically AWS? >> Oh, I mean, I think one of the biggest tailwinds we've had as a business is if you're releasing twice a year, we've had as a business is if you're releasing twice a year, you don't really need a tool like this, or a platform like this, your business process is completely different, but you're going to die as a company cause you can't survive on two releases a year. If you're moving to the cloud, we help you get there and once you're in the cloud, if you want to move at the speed of business, but safely, we give you that platform. Like, so, I think continuous delivery got this bad wrap because people thought that meant that you push out stuff every second and break everything. >> David: Right. >> What we do is we allow you to innovate as fast as you want, but release in a controlled way. >> I got to ask you a question, you, you talked about the customers and your love of being with customers, one of the things I can't help thinking is that what you're helping facilitate is brand reputation. If, you know, if we have an expectation and we want to go on a, on an app and order coffee, and it's down, we're going to go to the next competitor, so from a brand reputation perspective, I'm just wondering if, if any of your customer conversations kind of go in addition to the VP of engineering kind of go in addition to the VP of engineering and it focused on the folks that are leading these companies going, our reputation is on the line, people are, let's face it during COVID far less patience than we've, we've seen a lot of really impatient people, but is, is that something that you also facilitate, is the brand reputation? >> Oh, not just a brand reputation that an outage can be costly of millions of dollars, like. that an outage can be costly of millions of dollars, like. >> Lisa: $5,600 a minute, I think is what Gartner estimates. >> Yeah, but depending on what business you're in, like if you're in a bank, you absolutely need to be reliable. If you're a streaming service like streaming, one of the biggest horse races in Australia, you need to have uptime. >> Everybody needs uptime, let's, let's just be clear if I can't get door dash or whatever, it's a disaster from my perspective as a consumer and yes, we have, we have far less patience than we've ever had. >> Yeah, I mean, we have a really interesting, we have both B2C, like streaming ash, streaming apps, delivery apps, as well as B2B streaming apps, delivery apps, as well as B2B and they both have problems that we solve but honestly, the, the, the business problems with a B2B are much more challenging sometimes. >> Well Edith, thank you so much for joining David and me on the program, talking about LaunchDarkly, what you're enabling organizations to achieve in every industry, it sounds like you're riding a rocket ship. >> It's been really fun, you know, I, I love seeing a customer that's been using us for three, five years. >> David: Wow. >> And how much their life has gotten better. >> And as you said, that's, that's no small statement. Thank you so much for joining us on the program, we appreciate your insights and look forward to hearing more news from LaunchDarkly coming out. >> Thanks. >> All right, for David Nicholson, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching theCUBE's coverage of AWS:reinvent 2021, theCUBE, the global leader in live tech coverage. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

and it's a massive ecosystem of partners, you guys raised 200 million I also noticed you guys and it was this idea that you could that you thought this, this is missing, is push it out to who you want And when you say feature How do you do that? So they could push it to who they want, So knowing that you're in anticipation of delivering and they wanted a way and deploying 20x per day, that if you know that you you get to run the beta now. and smelling the product. Yeah or customer support, you know, and the flame, you know, the, the, and VP of engineering, from executives that don't and their customer obsession if you will, is visiting customers, you know, I, that you gave them their weekend back. you know, so? Yeah, you know, it, I can't imagine this, you know, now it's something that you have to have. but seriously, if you and even if you have a really Which, which if you're a mobile app, that you push out stuff every What we do is we allow you to innovate I got to ask you a question, you, that an outage can be costly think is what Gartner estimates. you need to have uptime. and yes, we have, we and they both have problems that we solve Well Edith, thank you so much It's been really fun, you know, I, And how much their And as you said, that's, you're watching theCUBE's

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavidPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

David NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

David NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

Edith HarbaughPERSON

0.99+

3 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

AustraliaLOCATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

20 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

2,500QUANTITY

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

two hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

AugustDATE

0.99+

2,500 customersQUANTITY

0.99+

500 websitesQUANTITY

0.99+

EdithPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

two remote setsQUANTITY

0.99+

200 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

over 100 guestsQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

seven years agoDATE

0.98+

ten yearQUANTITY

0.98+

two live setsQUANTITY

0.98+

millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

20 customersQUANTITY

0.98+

AtlassianORGANIZATION

0.98+

20 times a dayQUANTITY

0.98+

a mileQUANTITY

0.98+

twice a yearQUANTITY

0.98+

LaunchDarklyORGANIZATION

0.98+

2014DATE

0.98+

todayDATE

0.97+

this yearDATE

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

two releasesQUANTITY

0.96+

$5,600 a minuteQUANTITY

0.96+

1x a weekQUANTITY

0.96+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

CUBEORGANIZATION

0.96+

TrueCarORGANIZATION

0.95+

more than 3xQUANTITY

0.95+

To Be ContinuousTITLE

0.94+

LaunchDarklyTITLE

0.94+

one placeQUANTITY

0.94+

2nd yearQUANTITY

0.93+

20x per dayQUANTITY

0.92+

one quick switchQUANTITY

0.92+

three personQUANTITY

0.92+

2021DATE

0.9+

100QUANTITY

0.89+

few months agoDATE

0.83+

decadesQUANTITY

0.83+

InventEVENT

0.82+

MidwestLOCATION

0.82+

last 22 monthsDATE

0.81+

first 10QUANTITY

0.8+

Nick Schneider, Artic Wolf Networks | CUBE Conversation, September 2021


 

>> Viewers of our breaking analysis series know that we've been following the developments in cybersecurity for a number of years and of course, throughout the pandemic. Focusing on the permanent shifts that we see in cyber from remote work, distributed computing and technology advancements. We've reported how the adversaries are highly capable they're well-funded and they're motivated. And how they're constantly upping their game on defenders, island hopping, stealthily living off the land, planting self forming malware at various points in the digital supply chain, offering advanced ransomware as a service of the dark web to any disreputable individual with or without a high school diploma that may have access to a server and is brazen enough to steal from their company. We've also shared this chart from Optiv many, many times, it's a taxonomy of the cybersecurity landscape, and it is meant to make your eyes bleed, ask any CSO and they'll tell you they're drowning in fragmented tooling, technical debt, and their number one challenge is lack of talent. Not that their people aren't capable, they are, but CSOs just don't have enough of them. They can't hire fast enough or they can't retain qualified people with the talent war that's going on. Or they can't train people fast enough, or they just don't have the budget. Hello everyone, this is Dave Vellante and welcome to this video exclusive with Nick Schneider, president and CEO of Arctic Wolf Networks, Nick, so good to see you. Thanks for coming on the cube. >> Thanks for having me, Dave. >> That's our pleasure. So Arctic Wolf networks, let's talk about the company, the problem, you heard my little narrative upfront. What are you guys all about? >> Yeah, so at its core, we're a cybersecurity technology company. You know, it's our belief that we've really pioneered the first full scale cloud native security operations platform and at its core, what we're trying to do as a business is make security operations something that's fast, easy and economical for really a company of any size and scale to implement with really two key components, one we're agnostic to the technology and the landscape of the technology that they have already implemented within their environment, and two, we can feather into really any organization, regardless of the skill set they have from a cybersecurity standpoint in house. And really the problem that we're setting out to solve, I think you illustrated well at the beginning of the show here is that it's our belief that the cybersecurity industry in a sense has failed the end user or failed the customer by throwing, you know, a myriad of different tools at them. And it's really, you know, our mission here as a company to end cyber risk. And it's our belief that through the cloud native platform that we've bought in the cybersecurity security operations cloud that we've built, that we can deliver the outcomes that have been promised over time to these customers, which at the end of the day, is really just to be safe and have their customer and have their business protected. >> So you guys are the experts. You can kind of provide a white glove service that essentially plugs in to my business. Is that right? And how easy is that to do, what do I have to do to, to set it up? How complicated is that for me, the customer? >> Yeah, so it's, it's very straightforward. We can implement our security operations platform, you know, in as short as a week and generally speaking, you know, about a month and we plug in really to the infrastructure that the customer has in place. And for some of our customers, that's very little and for some of our customers, most of our customers, that's quite a bit of technology. And the beauty of the way that we've built the platform is that we're really agnostic to that tech. So, we can take feeds from kind of any technology that are in place, that helps to augment the platform that we've built. And then we feather in kind of the technologies that we've built within the platform, into their existing infrastructure. And at the end of the day, what we're trying to do is give the customer visibility, you know, into the tools that they have, the gaps that they might have as a result of the tools, you know, in some cases, the duplication of efforts that they have, you know, between these tools and then deliver a security outcome or a protection that maybe they haven't otherwise felt as a business. And then outside of kind of the technology platform, we add what we call our concierge security team as a layer to the deliverable that we give to the customer. And why that's important is that not all customers are created equal and with regard to the skillset that they have in house, in that that concierge security platform allows us to kind of work with a customer at any kind of, you know, point along their security journey, regardless of the in-house technology talent that they have. >> Now, so I got to ask you, our largest footprint for the cube is in the heart of Silicon Valley. We love the valley, but I also love stories of high growth companies that are outside of Silicon Valley. You guys are in the Midwest in Minnesota, it's got some Compellent DNA in there. And I remember my, so my business friends, Phil Soren, and Larry Yasmin, you know them, Phil used to tell me, Dave, this is actually an advantage for us to be in the middle of the part of the country. There's a talent war going on, which back then was a lot less than it is today, even. So how do you see that? Are there advantages to you and being in that part of the country, or does it not matter because you're so distributed around the world? >> Yeah, I mean, I would follow a similar tune to Phil, right. I, you know, obviously worked at Compellent early and, you know, historically I've worked at other Minneapolis based technology companies and the reality is there's a really strong technology ecosystem in Minneapolis. And a lot of the, of the talent, you know, is not just in sales and marketing or just on the technical side, but it's in building high growth technology companies kind of from the ground up into, you know, large scale. And now we've seen not only the fortune 500 kind of base that we have here in Minneapolis, but also a growing contingency of larger technology companies using Minneapolis as at least, you know, one of the spokes against their hub, if not the hub themselves. And clearly my pedigree in history was out of Minneapolis based tech, you know, and I've moved to other locations throughout the country, but as we started to build out, you know, Arctic Wolf and what we wanted Artic Wolf's culture to look like, and as we started to lay out the foundation for what we wanted our growth to look like, it became very clear to myself, you know, our chairman and co-founder Brian Nesmith, that Minneapolis would be a great home for us as Arctic Wolf. And then we would continue to invest in some of the locations that we have, you know, both across the country and now across the globe. >> So there are a lot of companies that are doing managed security services, but if I got it right, you guys specifically target smaller and midsize companies, is that correct? And why is that? >> Yeah, so I would say that that would be correct as of a few years ago, the dynamic has changed quite a bit. And I think it's a result of the dynamic of the market. First and foremost, we are a technology company. We have this concierge layer on top, which is really what the customers are looking for, but it's all powered by the platform. So the platform kind of allows us to do what we've done as a business, into both small organizations, which is, you know, where we probably got our start, but over the last few years, we've seen tremendous growth up market, you know, so for example, we as a business have grown, you know, over a hundred percent now for eight years in a row and now on a much larger denominator, but our upmarket business is growing at four to 500%. And I think that's a result of really two things. I think, A, customers of that size and scale have realized that cyber security and cybersecurity operations as a problem is something that's really hard to accomplish in-house regardless of your size and complexity. And then two, I think what happened over the past year, year and a half is that we saw a lot of organizations move from a centralized I.T or a centralized, you know, security function where they could all operate within an office and all operate in a centralized environment, all of a sudden becoming very disparate in their geography. And that led to a lot more interest in what we did with larger customers, because we could deploy a security operation effectively, remotely in a really short amount of time. And we could do it more effectively and economically than, than they could do on their own. And then we also solve for a component of the human aspect of what a security operation means, right. And what I mean by that is these larger organizations can take their highly skilled cybersecurity talent and focus them on the strategic initiatives within the company. Whereas a lot of the security work or risk is in kind of the day to day, right? The dieting that takes place within an organization. And that's where a lot of the breaches take place is in making sure that you're actually paying attention to, you know, the alerts that you're getting and paying attention to the telemetry and the tools that you've made investments in. And we augment that portion of a cybersecurity operation really, really well for larger organizations and for smaller organizations, we are that security operation. So it's kind of dependent on the way in which they're set up. >> Okay. So it's a mix of both well augmenting, and basically you take the whole thing and so, so your ideal customer profile, your ICP is anybody with a security problem. I mean, that's everybody, well, maybe you could describe paint a picture of your perfect customer, if you would. >> Yeah, so, and you, I know you said that somewhat jokingly, but it, but it is true. We have customers of all sizes, you know, so I, I bet our smallest customer is under 10 employees. Our largest customer is over 50,000 employees. We have customers in every vertical of the market, you know, mostly centralized in healthcare, financial organizations, manufacturing, but, you know, the largest swath of customers by industry would probably not top 10%. So, we service really any account that's looking to develop and invest in a security operation and has the support of their organization and the support of their board and their leadership teams to make that investment. And then where we, where we fall within the account is really dependent on the way in which their current operation is set up. And certainly, you know, the massive organizations that have, you know, 50 people within their cybersecurity team, and they have a hundred different tools. They're probably not the best target for us, but if they have security awareness, if they have a security as a top need or a top priority within their business, and they're looking for a way to build out a true security operation within their account, whether that be wholesale through a third-party or in part through a third-party, we're a perfect fit for all those accounts, which makes our addressable market massive. >> Yeah, so what's unique about you guys, I mean, this may be not the right analogy, but you're kind of like the easy button for cyber. I mean, there's nothing easy about cyber., I get that, but you, you do make it easy, especially for companies that don't have any cyber expertise to engage and get up to speed fast, and certainly be more protected. That's one aspect of your uniqueness. The other is, I think, is your tech stack. I'm hearing, you've got a platform. I know you're focused on network detection and fast response. Maybe you could talk a little bit about what's unique about Arctic Wolf. >> Yeah, so the platform itself is really what we founded the company on. So we spent the first few years of our organization in really building out this cloud scale, multitenant cloud, native platform, understanding that the volume of data and the amount of sophistication that we would need to deliver the security operation in the long run was going to be massive. So the platforms really kind of, you know, set on a few different founding principles. One, the platform needs to work for any organization regardless of their size, regardless of their underlying tech and regardless of the skill set within their account. And that's really important. A lot of the tools in the market today require certain things of the, of the customer. And it's our premise, regardless of the customer that we won't require anything from the customers themselves. It's up to them to tell us which portions of the experience they want to own, verse Artic Wolf owning. The second would be that we need to be able to ingest a vast amount of data, and we need to be able to make intelligent decisions with that data, in a short amount of time. And as we've built out our machine learning and our AR algorithms, what we've been able to do is leverage a tool set that allows us to ingest. I think we're up to now 1.5 approaching 2 trillion observations a week, right. Which might equate to a few hundred alerts within our SOC on a per customer basis. But we're only bringing one or two things to a customer on a weekly basis that really need attention. And that's all about the platform kind of curating, cultivating the vast amount of data that we've brought into it. And then, how do we explain and how do we sell that platform with this concierge later into the customer base is also important. And we've done that through what we call modules. So we kind of founded the company on MDR managed detection and response, but we are not a managed detection and response company. It's one of our modules. We've then added manage risk, which competes kind of in the vulnerability management space. We've added a SAS and IAS monitoring, which is really cloud security. We've added what we call log search, which is really our first foray into collaboration. And then we just recently launched a quarter ago, what we call managed security awareness training, which is, you know, training the human aspect of the company on the threats of cybersecurity. And we actually just announced another acquisition in the managed security space today with habituate, which is going to give us, you know, kind of a Hollywood style approach to content within managed awareness training. But tying all those together is very unique in the market. So generally speaking, you'll see a company focused on a specific attack surface, or a specific threat. And what we're trying to say is, look, you're not a hundred percent protected as a business, or you don't have a robust security operation unless you're bringing together all aspects of cybersecurity under one umbrella. And that's really our goal as a company. >> Okay. So you got all these different modules and you may not want to go here cause you're in the cyber business and you're, you're prudently secretive, but, but I'm interested in kind of what's underneath. I presume you're using best of breed tooling underneath, but unlike, you know, the hosting company of the past or those, you know, a big, you know, integrator who could do this, but they've got one of everything and it's sort of, kind of a mess. You're building a scalable business, but you're not, you're not developing, you know, best of breed, identity access products for the marketplace. You're I presume you're buying those in integrating them and working through whatever APIs and making it all work across your stack. Can you talk a little bit about your tech stack? >> Yeah, so the technology stack has been built from the ground up by Arctic Wolf. So certainly we're using, you know, various technologies or open source technologies from within the ecosystem, but the technology and the platform itself is Arctic Wolf. So we're not beholden to any third parties for what we deliver to the customer. And that makes us very nimble in a few areas. One, it makes us very nimble in the way that we price the solution to the customer, which for us is a very predictable model. And then two, it allows us to be nimble with customer needs as to what they want from us, both of the existing modules that we have, but also additional modules or, you know, additional solutions that we might bring to the market. So a lot of vendors that have historically kind of lived within the MDR space and certainly vendors that have lived in the managed, you know, the MSSP or MSP space, which we are certainly not, they're generally leveraging third-party technologies. They're generally buying and implementing or white labeling third-party technologies. And then they're layering kind of a services component on top. And we are not doing that. We've built the technology ourselves and don't get me wrong. That was a massive investment in both time and resources. But I think in the end, what it'll allow us to do is be very nimble with the market and most importantly, be very nimble with the customer's requirements and requests. >> Right. Okay. So let's talk about your market opportunity. I mean, the cyberspace, I mean, I got it well over a hundred billion, I don't know, maybe it's 110, 120 billion. That's kind of your tan, you may be not serving that entire market today. Although you said you started in small and mid-size, you're targeting now your enterprise, your higher end businesses growing, you talked about, I think you said a hundred percent growth, like eight quarters in a row. And so there's no shortage of opportunity for you. How do you think about your total available market? Maybe you could add some color to that. >> Yeah. Yeah. So it's been eight years of a hundred percent growth. >> Eight years, not eight quarter, I apologize. >> It's been going really well for us. And it's a reflection on the market itself and the approach we're taking. So in our view, security operations is really the opportunity to unify all these disparate markets in cybersecurity. And, when I walk into a customer account, if I had to use two words to describe how they're feeling, one would be confused, the other would be frustrated. Sometimes they're both. Sometimes they're only one, but generally speaking, one of those two words comes out of their mouth. And the reason for it is at the end of the day, they just want to be protected. They want the outcome. And all of these disparate markets are promising the same outcome, but they're just promising it on the endpoint or just on the network or just in cloud or just an IOT or just an OT, or just in fill in the blank. And it's our view that it's our opportunity as a company to really fill that void for the customer, which is to unify all of these different technologies and spaces into one security operation. And sometimes that means that we're delivering our own end point. And sometimes that means that we're leveraging an end point or an end point solution that the customer has in house. And we're ingesting that data into our platform and we're making sense of it to the end user. But when you put that market together, you know, it's a hundred, I think Gartner's recent numbers there are 150 plus billion dollar market. And in 2021, I think it's growing at, you know, 12 to 15%. And it's our view that we can service the majority of that market, you know, I think on a conservative measure, you know, 90 to a hundred billion is the, is the Tam that we're addressing. And we're now starting to go, not only scaling out from the number of products for the markets that we service, and you can see that through managed security awareness training, but also the geographies we service, the segments of the market we service, specialization within verticals. And, for us, that is the opportunity at the end here. >> I wonder if you could help us squint through some of the data you hear in the industry, some of the trends you see in the press, certainly this came up in the, in the solar winds hack. We were seeing, I mentioned upfront, the adversaries are very capable. They're able to get in, live off the land, live stealthily, they're island hopping into the supply chain. You know, oftentimes you don't know, more than often, you don't know they're there, I've heard stats like, and we look at the solar winds hack, we saw that it was, you know, 300 days or over a year that they were inside the company. And you've heard, you know, average statistics from, you know, whatever that it's hundreds of days are those, are you able to compress those? Can you talk about that a little bit in terms of where you see your customers and how you're helping them, you know, respond? >> Yeah, so at the end of the day, you know, cybersecurity, the industry is really about limiting the volume of incidents within a customer account and then limiting the impact. And what you're talking about is the impact. And the impact as these threat actors have become, you know, more sophisticated is larger as they're in the environment for a longer period of time. So the faster you can get to an attack or the faster you can detect an attack, the better off you'll be as a business. And that is the core of what we do as a company. And, and certainly, you know, managed detection response or MDR, our first offering was all about that. It's all about detecting early and responding early to a threat so that you can get anything that has gotten through your perimeter defenses out of your systems, as fast as humanly possible. And then we feathered in, you know, manage risk, which is more about the front end. So how do we make sure that we have everything configured properly? How do we make sure that we, you know, fill any holes that are in the current environment so that we don't even get to a point where we have to manage the time with which an attack has had to live within your environment? So, it's all about kind of those two things, reduce the frequency and reduce the impact. And we're, we're focused on both, both the, kind of the proactive measures, which would be more on the front end and then the reactive measures, which is what do you do and how can you act as quickly as possible within your environment to ensure that, you know, they're not getting into the crown jewels of the business. >> We've seen lately where the, the attackers have. I mean, it's really insidious, right Nick, they, they will exfiltrate, they'll get in they'll exfiltrate stealthily and they'll be ready to attack from a ransomware standpoint. And then they, you know, maybe they're hitting the bank and they're scouring to see what the Chief Information Officer is going to invest in. And they're actually making trades ahead of that. They're making more money, you know, snooping than from the ransomware. And then when the company realizes and they respond, then they get them in a headlock and say, okay, now, now that you're going to stop us from making all this money through exfiltration, we're going to hit you with ransomware. So it's just, it's a really awful situation. So my point being that, or we've said, organizations have to be stealthy in their response. Have you seen that as a trend? Am I overstating that? >> No, no. I mean, customers are, you know, good news, bad news customers are very aware of the threats in particular ransomware, data exfiltration and all the other trends in the market. And I think they become more sophisticated in the way in which they respond. And I think as a result, we've seen both changes in the way customers kind of set up their environment technologically, but we've also seen a pretty dramatic shift recently with the way in which they view insurance and the way in which, you know, carriers, view insurance, and how that plays a role in, you know, cybersecurity in their cybersecurity operation. And for a lot of customers, I think recent trends are that the carriers are struggling to, you know, make money on their cyber books. And the reason for that is because they need to make sure that the customer's environment is truly secure, or they're kind of flying blind on what their book looks like. And we've started to see that both on the end-user side, we've seen that through the carriers themselves, and that also has played an integral role in the way in which the customer views risk. And I think that dynamics changing. And I think what the result of that will be is that customers are going to be looking more and more towards how they solve this problem by alleviating risk in-house, as opposed to transferring some of that risk to an insurance carrier or a third party. And what I hope that means for customers is that they'll have the proper investment. They'll have the proper tooling, they'll have the proper operations around how to react and how to respond in the quickest possible manner, which at the end of the day, the faster you can react to an incident, the smaller the impact will be and the smaller of a financial burden it will be. And they'll do that through vendors like Arctic Wolf, you know, tools that are best of breed within their infrastructure. And then a really well thought out plan about how to respond to anything that, that you know, happens within their environment. >> Yeah. I mean, if I'm an insurance company, I give a discount to somebody who's got an alarm in their house and they use it. Maybe I'll give a discount if they're working with a company like Arctic Wolf. >> Exactly. >> What percent, do you have a census to what percent of enterprises actually have a SOC? >> Yeah, we actually did a, some homework here and there's kind of two stats that jump out. And these are through a few different surveys through very well-known organizations in the cybersecurity market. But one is that last year, which would have been, you know, 2020, about 60% of organizations said that they suffered some semblance of a breach, 60%, you know, think about how many tools and how much money these organizations are investing in protecting their businesses. And over half are suffering some semblance of a breach. When those same customers are asked whether or not they felt like they have a security operation, over 99% answered no. >> Wow. >> Right. So they have a bunch of tools they're investing a ton of money, but at the end of the day, when asked, hey, do you feel like you have an operation that can protect your business? Their answer is no. And that's really the void we're trying to. >> And you and I both know that 60%, okay. But then the other 40%, they've been hacked. They just don't know it. So, all right. Let's wrap with the sub stats on the company. I think you've raised nearly half a million, half a billion dollars to date $500 million to date. So that's, I can infer from that some pretty lofty numbers, but where are you in funding with that kind of growth? I got to believe IPO is and you and your future. What can you tell, what metrics can you share? What can you tell us about where you want to take this thing? >> Yeah, so I'll give you a few metrics on the platform and a few metrics on the company. So the platform itself, you know, we're observing over 1.5 trillion observations a week, we have 10,000 plus sensors in the field. You know, we're ingesting coming from a, you know, Compellent infrastructure guy. You know, we're in ingesting over a petabyte and a half a data week. I would have loved to have been that sales guy in the glory days, you know, but the platforms, you know, operating at massive scale, we've grown the business eight years in a row, over a hundred percent. We've talked about that. Our subscription gross margins are very software-like. We have over 2000 customers. You know, our customers are really happy with an NPS score, you know, approaching 70, you know, over a million licensed users. So we're, we're doing very, very well as a business. And as a result, we've raised money to invest in that growth, which is to the tune of about a half a billion dollars and our path here, and we've stated this publicly now is that, you know, next summer give or take a quarter is really the timeframe that we're marching towards for an IPO. If I'm being honest, given the metrics that we have as a business, we could be a publicly traded company today, especially with the way the market's operating in the valuations of some of the businesses that have gone out. There might be some, even some pressure to do so, but we want to make sure that we are ready to go from a systems and an operation standpoint to not just be, you know, a flashing the pan awesome IPO, but a company that's really kind of the backbone of cybersecurity for years to come. >> Well, obviously a hot space. What we've been covering for a couple of years now, Okta, CrowdStrike, Zscaler, we've seen what's happened in the action in the market there. I mean, what are your comps? I mean, I know, I think dark trace is getting ready to go. I don't think they've gone yet. I know Sentinel One went out. How should we think about you? You're not an Okta or I don't think well, CrowdStrike, but you know, those are pure play product companies. How should we think about you guys? >> Yeah, I mean, companies that were on a similar trajectory as us at our size, Sentinel One's a very good example. And you can kind of look across all the core business metrics on that. And clearly those will all be public here in under a year. CrowdStrike's a great example. If you go, you know, reel back the tape to when they were, you know, our size we're right in line with them Zscaler, Okta, you know, I joke with our board and investors and our CFO, that the number of companies that we benchmark ourselves against is starting to become a very small number, given you know, our growth at the scale that we're at. >> Well, that's an awesome story, Nick. We're really excited that you could make some time to come on the Cube and we want to follow your progress. Welcome you back anytime. Really appreciate your time. >> Yeah. Great. Thanks for having me, Dave, and looking forward to continuing the conversation at some point. >> Excellent and thank you for watching everybody. This is Dave Vellante for the Cube and we'll see you next time.

Published Date : Sep 30 2021

SUMMARY :

and they'll tell you they're the problem, you heard my And it's really, you know, And how easy is that to do, that they have, you know, and being in that part of the And a lot of the, of the talent, you know, and the tools that you've and basically you take And certainly, you know, the easy button for cyber. So the platforms really kind of, you know, but unlike, you know, in the managed, you know, I mean, the cyberspace, I mean, So it's been eight years of Eight years, not eight is really the opportunity to unify all some of the trends you see in the press, And that is the core of And then they, you know, and how that plays a role in, you know, I give a discount to somebody which would have been, you know, And that's really the and you and your future. So the platform itself, you know, but you know, those are to when they were, you know, on the Cube and we want the conversation at some Excellent and thank you

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Larry YasminPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Brian NesmithPERSON

0.99+

Phil SorenPERSON

0.99+

12QUANTITY

0.99+

MinneapolisLOCATION

0.99+

Arctic WolfORGANIZATION

0.99+

Nick SchneiderPERSON

0.99+

CrowdStrikeORGANIZATION

0.99+

NickPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

eight yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

OktaORGANIZATION

0.99+

60%QUANTITY

0.99+

two wordsQUANTITY

0.99+

300 daysQUANTITY

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

$500 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

September 2021DATE

0.99+

40%QUANTITY

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

Arctic Wolf NetworksORGANIZATION

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

90QUANTITY

0.99+

ZscalerORGANIZATION

0.99+

PhilPERSON

0.99+

50 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

10%QUANTITY

0.99+

Artic Wolf NetworksORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

Eight yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

over 50,000 employeesQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Artic WolfORGANIZATION

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

15%QUANTITY

0.99+

next summerDATE

0.99+

two statsQUANTITY

0.99+

10,000 plus sensorsQUANTITY

0.98+

first offeringQUANTITY

0.98+

over 2000 customersQUANTITY

0.98+

over 99%QUANTITY

0.98+

Sentinel OneORGANIZATION

0.98+

OptivORGANIZATION

0.98+

2 trillion observationsQUANTITY

0.98+

Arctic Wolf networksORGANIZATION

0.98+

over a hundred percentQUANTITY

0.98+

over a yearQUANTITY

0.97+

500%QUANTITY

0.97+

150 plus billion dollarQUANTITY

0.97+

CompellentORGANIZATION

0.97+

over a petabyteQUANTITY

0.97+

hundreds of daysQUANTITY

0.97+

under 10 employeesQUANTITY

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

Dheeraj Pandey, Nutanix | theCUBE on Cloud 2021


 

>> Hi, and this is theCUBE on Cloud. I'm Stu Miniman and really excited to welcome to a special Fireside Chat. CUBE Alumni has been on the program so many times. We always love talking to founders. We like talking to deep thinkers and that's why he was one of the early ones that I reached out to when we were working on this event. When we first started conversations, we were looking at how hyperscalers really were taking adoption of the brand new technologies, things like flash, things like software defined networking, and how that would invade the enterprise. That of course has had a huge impact, help create a category called hyperconverged infrastructure and I'm talking about Dheeraj Pandey. He is the founder, chairman, and CEO of Nutanix, taking HCI from hyperconverged infrastructure to hybrid cloud infrastructure. So Dheeraj, welcome to the Fireside Chat. Thank you so much for joining us. >> Thank you, Stu, and thank you for the last 10 years that we've grown together, both theCUBE and Nutanix and myself as a leader in the last 10 years. So bringing HCI from hyperconverged to hybrid cloud just reminds me of how the more things change, the more they remain the same. So looking forward to a great discussion here. >> So talk about that early discussion, what the hyperscalers were doing, how can the enterprise take advantage of that? Over time, enterprise has matured and looked a little bit more like the hyperscalers. Hybrid cloud of course is on everyone's lip, as well as we've seen the hyperscalers themselves look more and more like the enterprise. So hybrid and multicloud is where we are today. We think it'll be in the future. But give us a little bit as to how you've seen that progression today and where are we going down the road here? >> Yeah, I think I talked about this during my .NEXT keynote. And the whole idea of, in every recession, we make things smaller. In '91 we said we're going to go away from mainframes into Unix servers. And we made the unit of compute smaller. Then in the year 2000 when there was the next bubble burst and the recession afterwards, we moved from Unix servers to Wintel: Windows and Intel, x86 and eventually Linux as well. Again we made things smaller going from million dollar servers to $5,000 servers, shorter lived servers. And that's what we did in 2008/2009. I said, look, we don't even need to buy servers. We can do things with virtual machines which are servers that are an incarnation in the digital world. There is nothing in the physical world that actually went lives. But we made it even smaller. And now with cloud in the last three, four years and what will happen in this coming decade, they're going to make it even smaller, not just in space which is size with functions and containers and virtual machines, but also in time. So space and time, we're talking about hourly billing and monthly billing and a one-year term as opposed to really going and committing to five or seven years of hardware and CapEx. So I think as you make things smaller, I mean, and this is true for as consumers, we have short attention spans, things are going fast. The cycle of creative destruction of virtual machines is shrinking as well. So I think in many cases, we know we've gone and created this autonomy, massive sprawl. Like we created a massive sprawl of Intel servers back in '95 and 2005. Then we have to use virtualization to go and consolidate all of it, created beautiful data centers of Intel servers with VMware software. And then we created a massive sprawl of data centers, of consolidated data centers with one click private cloud in the last five years and hopefully in the next five too. But I think we're also now creating a proliferation of clouds. There is a sprawl, massive sprawl of cost centers and such. So we need yet another layer of software for governance to reign in on that chaos, hence the need for a new HCI, hybrid cloud infrastructure. >> Yeah, it's fascinating to kind of watch that progression over time. There was a phenomenal Atlantic article. I think it was from like the 1940s or 1950s where somebody took what was happening post-World War II and projected things out. We're talking really pre the internet, but just the miniaturization and the acceleration, kind of the Moore's law discussion. If you take things out, where it would go. When I talked to Amazon, they said the one thing that we know for sure, I'm talking to Amazon.com is that people will want it faster and cheaper in the future. I don't know which robot or drone or things that they have. But absolutely there are those certain characteristics. So from a leadership standpoint, Dheeraj, talk about these changes? We had the wave of virtualization, the wave of containerization, you talked about functions in serverless. Those are tools. But at the end of the day, it's about the outcomes and how do we take advantage of things? So how as a leader do you make sure that you know where to take the company as these technology waves and changes impact what you're doing? >> Yeah, it's a great point. I mean, we celebrate things in IT a lot, but we don't talk about what does it take? What's the underlying fabric to really use these things successfully and better than others and not just use buzzwords, because new buzzwords will come in the next three years. For example AI and ML has been a great buzzword for the last three, four years. But there's very few companies, probably less than even half a percent who know how to leverage machine learning, even understand the difference between machine learning and AI. And a lot of it comes down to a few principles. There's a culture principles, not the least of which is how you celebrate failure, because now you're doing shorter, smaller things. You've got a more agile, you'll have more velocity. Gone are the days of waterfall where you're doing yearly planning and pre-year releases and such. So as we get into this new world, not everything will be perfect, and you've got to really learn to pick yourself up and recover quickly, heal quickly and such. So that is the fundamental tenet of Silicon Valley. And we got to really go and use this more outside the Valley as well in every company out there. Whether it's East Coast company, the Midwest company that are outside the U.S. I think this idea that you will be vulnerable, more vulnerable as you go and learn to do things faster and shorter. I think product management is a term that we don't fully understand, and this is about the why before the how and the what. We quickly jump to the what: containers and functions and databases, servers, and AI, and ML, they're the what. But how do you really start with the why? You know my fascination for one of my distant mentors, Simon Sinek and how he thinks about most companies just focusing on the what, while very few actually start with why, then the how, then the what itself. And product management has to play a key role in this, which also subsumes design, thinking about simplification and elegance and reducing friction. I think again, very few companies, probably no more than 1% of the companies really understand what it means to start with design and APIs, user experience APIs for developers before you even get to writing any single line of code. So I think to me, that's leadership. When you can stay away from instant gratification of the end result, but start with the why, then the how, then the what. >> Yeah, as we know in the technology space, oftentimes the technology is the easy part. It's helping to drive that change. I think back to the early days when we were talking, it was, hyperconverge, it was a threat to storage. We're going to put you out of a job. And we'd always go and say, "Look, no, no, no. We're not putting you out of a job. We're going to free you up to do the things that you want to do. That security project that's been sitting on the shelf for six months, you can go do that. Helping build new parts of the business. Those things that you can do." It's that shifting a mindset can be so difficult. And Dheeraj, I mean, you look at 2020, everyone has had to shift their mindset for everything. I was spending half my time on the road. I don't miss the hotels. I do miss seeing lots and lots of people in person. So what's your advice for people, how they can stay malleable, be open to some change? What are you seeing out there? What advice do you give there? >> Yeah, I think, as you said, inertia is at the core of most things in our lives, including what we saw in healthcare for the last 20, 30 years. I mean, there was so much regulation. The doctor's community had to move forward, nurses had to move forward. I mean, not just providers, but insurance companies. And finally, all of a sudden, we're talking about telehealth because of the pandemic. We are talking about online learning. I mean the things that higher ed refused to do. I mean if you think about the last 20 years of what had happened with the cost of higher ed, I mean it's 200% growth when the cost of television has gone down by probably 100, 200% with more features. Healthcare, higher ed, education in general, all of a sudden is coming for this deep shock because of the pandemic. And I think it's these kind of black swan moments that really changed the world. And I know it's a cliche to say this. But I feel like we are going to be in a new normal, and we have been forced to this new change of digital. I mean, you and I are sitting and talking over the internet. It's a little awkward right now because there's a little bit of a delay in the way I'm looking at things. But I know it's going to directionally be right. I mean, we will go in a way where it just become seamless over time. So change is the only constant. And I believe that I think what we've seen in the pandemic is just the beginning of what digital will mean going forward. And I think the more people embrace it, the faster we do it. Speed is going to be the name of the game when it comes to survival and thriving in this new age. >> Dheeraj, it's interesting. We do hope, I'm a technologist. I know you're an optimist when it comes to things. So we always look at those silver linings. Like I hope healthcare and education will be able to move forward fast. Higher education costs, inequity out there for access to medicine. It would be wonderful if we could help solve some of that, despite this global pandemic. One of the other results, Dheeraj, we talked about some very shifts in the marketplace, the large tech players really have emerged in winter so far in 2020. I can't help, but watch the stock market. And Apple is bigger than ever, Amazon, Google, all ended up in front of Congress to talk about if they've gotten too big. You've partnered with Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. They are potentially a threat but also a partner. From your standpoint, have they gotten too much power? Do we have an inequity in the tech world that they are creating the universes that they will just kind of block off and limit innovation? What's your take on big tech? >> Yeah, I mean, I feel like there's always been big something. I mean, if you go back to the '90s, Amazon, not Amazon, IBM was big, and Microsoft was big, and AT&T was big. I mean, there's always been big companies because the consumer effect that they've had as well, I mean. And I think what we're seeing right now is no different. I mean, at the end of the day, the great thing about this country is that there's always disruption happening. And sometimes small is way better and way more competitive than big. Now at the same time, I do look up to the way some of them have organized themselves. Like the way Amazon has organized itself is really unique and creative with general managers and very independent, highly autonomous groups. So some of these organizations will definitely survive and thrive in scale. And yet for others, I think decision-making and staying competitive and staying scrappy will come a lot harder. So to me when I look at these big names and what Congress is talking about and such, I feel like there's no different than 20, 30, 40 years ago. I mean, we talked about Rockefeller and the oil giants back from 100 years ago. And so in many ways, I mean, the more things change, the more they remain the same. All we have to do is we have to walk over to where the customer is. And that's what we've done with the partnerships. Like in Amazon and Azure, we're saying look, we can even use your commits and credits. I mean, that is a very elegant way to go to where the customer is, rather than force them to where we are. And the public cloud is facing this too. They've come to realize in the last two years that they cannot force all of enterprise computing to come to hyperscalers data centers. They'll have to take in these bite-size smaller clouds to where the customer is, where the customer's machines are, where the customers people are, where the customers data is. That's where we also take to disperse the cloud itself. So I think there's going to be a yin yang where we'll try to walk with the customer to where we want them to be, whether it's hyperscaler data center or the notion of hybrid cloud infrastructure. But many a time, we've got to walk over to where they are. I mean, and outside the U.S, I mean, the cloud is such a nuanced word. I mean, we're talking about sovereignty, we're talking about data gravity, we're talking about economics of owning versus renting. This trifecta, the laws of the land, the laws of physics, and the laws of economics will dictate many of these things as well. So I think the big folks are also humble and vulnerable to realize that there's nothing more powerful than market forces. And I think the rest will take care of itself. >> Yeah, my quick commentary on that, Dheeraj, I think most of us look back at AT&T and felt the government got it wrong. The way they broke it up and ended up consolidating back together, it didn't necessarily help consumers. Microsoft on the other hand might've had a little bit too much power and was leveraging that against competition and really squashing innovation. So in general, it's good to see that the politics are looking at that and chore felt. The last time I watched things, they were a little bit more educated than some previous times there, where it was almost embarrassing to watch our representatives fumbling around with technology. So it's always good to question authority, question what they have. And one of the things you've brought up many times is you're open to listening and you're bringing in new ideas. I remember one conversation I had with you is there's that direction that you hold on to, but you will assess and do new data. You've made adjustments in the product portfolio and direction based on your customers, based on the ecosystem. And you've mentioned some of the, bring thoughts that you've brought into the company and you share. So you mentioned black swan that seem to head you brought to one of the European .NEXT shows. It was great to be able to see that author and read through advisors like Condoleezza Rice who you've had at the conferences a couple of times. Where are you getting some of your latest inspiration from, any new authors or podcasts that you'd be recommending to the audience? >> Yeah, I look at adjacencies, obviously Simon has been great. He was .NEXT, talked about the Infinite Game. And we'll talk about the Infinite Game with Nutanix too with respect to also my decision. But Brene Brown was been very close to Nutanix. I was just looking at her latest podcast, and she was sitting with the author of Stretch, Scott Sonnenschein, and it's a fascinating read and a great listen, by the way, I think for worth an hour, talking about scrappiness, and talking about resourcefulness. What does it mean to really be resourceful? And we need that even more so as we go through this recession, as we are sheltered in place. I think it's an adjacency to everything that Brene does. And I was just blown away by just listening to it. I'd a love for others to even have a listen and learn to understand what we can do within our families, with our budgets, with our companies, with our startups. I mean, with CUBE, I mean, what does it mean to be scrappy? And celebrate scrappiness and resourcefulness, more so than AI always need more. I think I just found it fascinating in the last week itself listening through it. >> John Farinacci talk many times that founder, startup, that being able to pull themselves up, be able to drive forward, overcome obstacles. So Dheeraj, do you tee it up? It sounds like is the next step for you. There's a transition under discussion. Bain has made an investment. There's a search for new CEO. Are you saying there's a book club in your future to be able to get things ready? Why don't you explain a little bit, 11 years took the company public, over 6,500 employees public company. So tell us a little bit about that decision-making process and what you expect to see in the future? >> Yeah, it's probably one of the hardest things as an entrepreneur is to let go, because it's a creation that you followed from scratch, from nothing. And it was a process for me to rethink about what's next for the company and then what's next for me? And me and the company were so tightly coupled that I was like, wow, at some point, this has to be a little bit more like the way Bill Gates did it with Microsoft, and there's going to be buton zone and you will then start to realize that your identity is different from the company's identity. And maybe the company is built for bigger, better things. And maybe you're built for bigger, better things. And how do you really start to first do this decoupling of the identity? And it's really hard. I mean, I'm sure that parents go through this. I mean, our children are still very young. Our eldest is nine going on 10 and our twin girls are six. I know at some point in the next 10 years, eight to 10 years, we'll have to figure out what it means to let go. And I'm already doing this with my son. I tell him you're born free. I mean, the word born free which drives my wife crazy sometimes. I say this to them, it's about independence. And I think the company is also born free to really think about a life outside of me, as well outside of founder. And that was a very important process for me as I was talking to the board for the last six, seven, eight months. And when the Bain deal came in, I thought it was a great time. We ended the fiscal really well, all things considered. We had a good quarter. The transition has been a journey of a lifetime, the business model transition I speak of. Really three years, I mean, I have aged probably 10 years in these last three years. But I think I would not replaced it for anything. Just the experience of learning what it means to change as a public company when you have short-term goals and long-term goals, we need the conviction, knowing what's right, because otherwise we would not have survived this cloud movement, all this idea of actually becoming a subscription company, changing the core of the business in the on-prem world itself. It's a king to change the wings of a plane at 40,000 feet where none of the passengers blink. It's been phenomenal ride last 11 years, but it's also been nonstop monomaniacal. I mean, I use the word marathon for this, and I figured it's a good time to say figure out a way to let go of this, and think of what's bigger better for Nutanix. And going from zero to a billion six in annual billings, and looking at billion six to 3 billion to four to five, I think it'd be great &to look at this from afar. And at the same time, I think there's vulnerability. I mean, I've made the company vulnerable. I've made myself vulnerable. We don't know who the next leader will be. And I think the next three to six months is one of the most important baton zones that I have ever experienced to be a part of. So looking forward to make sure that baton doesn't fall, redefine what good to great looks like, both for the company and for myself. And at the same time, go read more. I mean, I've been passionate about developers in the last 10 years, 11 years. I was a developer myself. This company, Nutanix, was really built by developers for IT. And I'm learning more about the developer as a consumer. How do you think about their experience? Not just the things that we throw at them from open source point of view and from cloud and technologies and AI and ML point of view, but really their lives, having them think about revenue and business and really blurring the lines between architects and product managers and developers. I think it's just an unfathomable problem we've created in IT that I would love to go and read and write more about. >> Yeah, so many important things you said there. I absolutely think that there are certain things everybody of course will think of you for a long time with Nutanix, but there is that separation between the role in the company and the person itself, and really appreciated how much you've always shared along those lines. So last question I have and you hit it up a little bit when you talked about developers. Take off your Nutanix hat for a second here, now what do we need to do to make sure that the next decade is successful in this space, cloud as a general guideline? Yes, we know we have skill gap. We know we need more people, we need more diversity. But there's so much that we need and there's so much opportunity, but what do you see and any advice areas that you think are critical for success in the future? >> Yeah, I mean, you hit up on something that I have had a passion for, probably more late in this world, more so than conspicuous, and and you hit upon it right now, diversity and inclusion. It's an unresolved problem in the developer community: the black developer, the woman developer. The idea of, I mean, we've two girls, they're twins. I'd love for them to embrace computer science and even probably do a PhD. I mean, I was a dropout. I'd love for them to do better than I did. Get, embrace things that are adjacent to biology and computer science. Go solve really hard problems. And we've not done those things. I mean, we've not looked at the community of developers and said, you know, they are the maker. And they work with managers and the maker manager world is two different worlds. How do you make this less friction? And how do you make this more delightful? And how do you think of developers as business, as if they are the folks who run the business? I think there's a lot that's missing there. And again, we throw a lot of jargons at them, and we talk a lot about automation and tools and such. But those are just things. I think the last 10, 11 years of me really just thinking about product and product portfolio and design and the fact that we have so many developers at Nutanix. I think it has been a mind-boggling experience, thinking about the why and the how and the what of the day in the life of, the month in the life of, and thinking about simple things like OKRs. I mean, we are throwing these jargons of OKRs at them: productivity, offshoring, remote work, over the zoom design sessions. It's just full of conflict and friction. So I think there is an amazing opportunity for Nutanix. There's an amazing opportunity for the industry to elevate this where the the woman developer can speak up in this world that's full of so many men. The black developer can speak up. And all of us can really think of this as something that's more structured, more productive, more revenue-driven, more customer in rather than developer out. That's really been some of the things that have been in my head, things that are still unresolved at Nutanix that I'm pretty sure at many of the places out there. That's what thinking and reading and writing about. >> Well, Dheeraj, first of all, thank you so much again for participating here. It's been great having you in theCUBE community, almost since the inception of us doing it back in 2010. Wish you the best of luck in the current transition. And absolutely look forward to talking more in the future. >> Thank you. And again, a big fan of the tremor rate of John, Dave, and you. Always learn so much from you, folks. Looking forward to be a constant student. Thank you. >> Thank you for joining us at theCUBE on Cloud. Lots more coverage here. Be sure to look throughout the site, engage in the chats, and give us your feedback. We're here to help you with the virtual events. I'm Stu Miniman as always. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Jan 22 2021

SUMMARY :

of the brand new technologies, in the last 10 years. and more like the enterprise. and the recession afterwards, and cheaper in the future. So that is the fundamental I don't miss the hotels. I mean the things that One of the other results, Dheeraj, I mean, at the end of the day, And one of the things you've and a great listen, by the and what you expect to see in the future? And I think the next three to six months and the person itself, and the fact that we have so in the current transition. And again, a big fan of the tremor rate engage in the chats, and

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

DheerajPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FarinacciPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Condoleezza RicePERSON

0.99+

NutanixORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

AT&TORGANIZATION

0.99+

$5,000QUANTITY

0.99+

Amazon.comORGANIZATION

0.99+

SimonPERSON

0.99+

BrenePERSON

0.99+

200%QUANTITY

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

nineQUANTITY

0.99+

Brene BrownPERSON

0.99+

Simon SinekPERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

eightQUANTITY

0.99+

Dheeraj PandeyPERSON

0.99+

2005DATE

0.99+

2010DATE

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

zeroQUANTITY

0.99+

Bill GatesPERSON

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

seven yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

40,000 feetQUANTITY

0.99+

10QUANTITY

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

two girlsQUANTITY

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

1950sDATE

0.99+

CongressORGANIZATION

0.99+

11 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

one-yearQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Infinite GameTITLE

0.99+

1940sDATE

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

StuPERSON

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

over 6,500 employeesQUANTITY

0.99+

LinuxTITLE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

last weekDATE

0.98+

U.S.LOCATION

0.98+

CapExORGANIZATION

0.98+

twin girlsQUANTITY

0.98+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.98+

MoorePERSON

0.98+

U.SLOCATION

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

'95DATE

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

40 yearsDATE

0.98+

'91DATE

0.97+

one clickQUANTITY

0.97+

Dheeraj Pandey, Nutanix | CUBE On Cloud


 

>> Hi, and this is theCUBE on Cloud. I'm Stu Miniman and really excited to welcome to a special Fireside Chat. CUBE Alumni has been on the program so many times. We always love talking to founders. We like talking to deep thinkers and that's why he was one of the early ones that I reached out to when we were working on this event. When we first started conversations, we were looking at how hyperscalers really were taking adoption of the brand new technologies, things like flash, things like software defined networking, and how that would invade the enterprise. That of course has had a huge impact, help create a category called hyperconverged infrastructure and I'm talking about Dheeraj Pandey. He is the founder, chairman, and CEO of Nutanix, taking HCI from hyperconverged infrastructure to hybrid cloud infrastructure. So Dheeraj, welcome to the Fireside Chat. Thank you so much for joining us. >> Thank you, Stu, and thank you for the last 10 years that we've grown together, both theCUBE and Nutanix and myself as a leader in the last 10 years. So bringing HCI from hyperconverged to hybrid cloud just reminds me of how the more things change, the more they remain the same. So looking forward to a great discussion here. >> So talk about that early discussion, what the hyperscalers were doing, how can the enterprise take advantage of that? Over time, enterprise has matured and looked a little bit more like the hyperscalers. Hybrid cloud of course is on everyone's lip, as well as we've seen the hyperscalers themselves look more and more like the enterprise. So hybrid and multicloud is where we are today. We think it'll be in the future. But give us a little bit as to how you've seen that progression today and where are we going down the road here? >> Yeah, I think I talked about this during my .NEXT keynote. And the whole idea of, in every recession, we make things smaller. In '91 we said we're going to go away from mainframes into Unix servers. And we made the unit of compute smaller. Then in the year 2000 when there was the next bubble burst and the recession afterwards, we moved from Unix servers to Wintel: Windows and Intel, x86 and eventually Linux as well. Again we made things smaller going from million dollar servers to $5,000 servers, shorter lived servers. And that's what we did in 2008/2009. I said, look, we don't even need to buy servers. We can do things with virtual machines which are servers that are an incarnation in the digital world. There is nothing in the physical world that actually went lives. But we made it even smaller. And now with cloud in the last three, four years and what will happen in this coming decade, they're going to make it even smaller, not just in space which is size with functions and containers and virtual machines, but also in time. So space and time, we're talking about hourly billing and monthly billing and a one-year term as opposed to really going and committing to five or seven years of hardware and CapEx. So I think as you make things smaller, I mean, and this is true for as consumers, we have short retention spans, things are going fast. The cycle of creative destruction of virtual machines is shrinking as well. So I think in many cases, we know we've gone and created this autonomy, massive sprawl. Like we created a massive sprawl of Intel servers back in '95 and 2005. Then we have to use virtualization to go and consolidate all of it, created beautiful data centers of Intel servers with VMware software. And then we created a massive sprawl of data centers, of consolidated data centers with one click private cloud in the last five years and hopefully in the next five too. But I think we're also now creating a proliferation of clouds. There is a sprawl, massive sprawl of cost centers and such. So we need yet another layer of software for governance to reign in on that chaos, hence the need for a new HCI, hybrid cloud infrastructure. >> Yeah, it's fascinating to kind of watch that progression over time. There was a phenomenal Atlantic article. I think it was from like the 1940s or 1950s where somebody took what was happening post-World War II and projected things out. We're talking really pre the internet, but just the miniaturization and the acceleration, kind of the Moore's law discussion. If you take things out, where it would go. When I talked to Amazon, they said the one thing that we know for sure, I'm talking to Amazon.com is that people will want it faster and cheaper in the future. I don't know which robot or drone or things that they have. But absolutely there are those certain characteristics. So from a leadership standpoint, Dheeraj, talk about these changes? We had the wave of virtualization, the wave of containerization, you talked about functions in serverless. Those are tools. But at the end of the day, it's about the outcomes and how do we take advantage of things? So how as a leader do you make sure that you know where to take the company as these technology waves and changes impact what you're doing? >> Yeah, it's a great point. I mean, we celebrate things in IT a lot, but we don't talk about what does it take? What's the underlying fabric to really use these things successfully and better than others and not just use buzzwords, because new buzzwords will come in the next three years. For example AI and ML has been a great buzzword for the last three, four years. But there's very few companies, probably less than even half a percent who know how to leverage machine learning, even understand the difference between machine learning and AI. And a lot of it comes down to a few principles. There's a culture principles, not the least of which is how you celebrate failure, because now you're doing shorter, smaller things. You've got a more agile, you'll have more velocity. Gone are the days of waterfall where you're doing yearly planning and pre-year releases and such. So as we get into this new world, not everything will be perfect, and you've got to really learn to pick yourself up and recover quickly, heal quickly and such. So that is the fundamental tenet of Silicon Valley. And we got to really go and use this more outside the Valley as well in every company out there. Whether it's East Coast company, the Midwest company that are outside the U.S. I think this idea that you will be vulnerable, more vulnerable as you go and learn to do things faster and shorter. I think product management is a term that we don't fully understand, and this is about the why before the how and the what. We quickly jump to the what: containers and functions and databases, servers, and AI, and ML, they're the what. But how do you really start with the why? You know my fascination for one of my distant mentors, Simon Sinek and how he thinks about most companies just focusing on the what, while very few actually start with why, then the how, then the what itself. And product management has to play a key role in this, which also subsumes design, thinking about simplification and elegance and reducing friction. I think again, very few companies, probably no more than 1% of the companies really understand what it means to start with design and APIs, user experience APIs for developers before you even get to writing any single line of code. So I think to me, that's leadership. When you can stay away from instant gratification of the end result, but start with the why, then the how, then the what. >> Yeah, as we know in the technology space, oftentimes the technology is the easy part. It's helping to drive that change. I think back to the early days when we were talking, it was, hyperconverge, it was a threat to storage. We're going to put you out of a job. And we'd always go and say, "Look, no, no, no. We're not putting you out of a job. We're going to free you up to do the things that you want to do. That security project that's been sitting on the shelf for six months, you can go do that. Helping build new parts of the business. Those things that you can do." It's that shifting a mindset can be so difficult. And Dheeraj, I mean, you look at 2020, everyone has had to shift their mindset for everything. I was spending half my time on the road. I don't miss the hotels. I do miss seeing lots and lots of people in person. So what's your advice for people, how they can stay malleable, be open to some change? What are you seeing out there? What advice do you give there? >> Yeah, I think, as you said, inertia is at the core of most things in our lives, including what we saw in healthcare for the last 20, 30 years. I mean, there was so much regulation. The doctor's community had to move forward, nurses had to move forward. I mean, not just providers, but insurance companies. And finally, all of a sudden, we're talking about telehealth because of the pandemic. We are talking about online learning. I mean the things that higher ed refused to do. I mean if you think about the last 20 years of what had happened with the cost of higher ed, I mean it's 200% growth when the cost of television has gone down by probably 100, 200% with more features. Healthcare, higher ed, education in general, all of a sudden is coming for this deep shock because of the pandemic. And I think it's these kind of black swan moments that really changed the world. And I know it's a cliche to say this. But I feel like we are going to be in a new normal, and we have been forced to this new change of digital. I mean, you and I are sitting and talking over the internet. It's a little awkward right now because there's a little bit of a delay in the way I'm looking at things. But I know it's going to directionally be right. I mean, we will go in a way where it just become seamless over time. So change is the only constant. And I believe that I think what we've seen in the pandemic is just the beginning of what digital will mean going forward. And I think the more people embrace it, the faster we do it. Speed is going to be the name of the game when it comes to survival and thriving in this new age. >> Dheeraj, it's interesting. We do hope, I'm a technologist. I know you're an optimist when it comes to things. So we always look at those silver linings. Like I hope healthcare and education will be able to move forward fast. Higher education costs, inequity out there for access to medicine. It would be wonderful if we could help solve some of that, despite this global pandemic. One of the other results, Dheeraj, we talked about some very shifts in the marketplace, the large tech players really have emerged in winter so far in 2020. I can't help, but watch the stock market. And Apple is bigger than ever, Amazon, Google, all ended up in front of Congress to talk about if they've gotten too big. You've partnered with Amazon, Microsoft, and Google. They are potentially a threat but also a partner. From your standpoint, have they gotten too much power? Do we have an inequity in the tech world that they are creating the universes that they will just kind of block off and limit innovation? What's your take on big tech? >> Yeah, I mean, I feel like there's always been big something. I mean, if you go back to the '90s, Amazon, not Amazon, IBM was big, and Microsoft was big, and AT&T was big. I mean, there's always been big companies because the consumer effect that they've had as well, I mean. And I think what we're seeing right now is no different. I mean, at the end of the day, the great thing about this country is that there's always disruption happening. And sometimes small is way better and way more competitive than big. Now at the same time, I do look up to the way some of them have organized themselves. Like the way Amazon has organized itself is really unique and creative with general managers and very independent, highly autonomous groups. So some of these organizations will definitely survive and thrive in scale. And yet for others, I think decision-making and staying competitive and staying scrappy will come a lot harder. So to me when I look at these big names and what Congress is talking about and such, I feel like there's no different than 20, 30, 40 years ago. I mean, we talked about Rockefeller and the oil giants back from 100 years ago. And so in many ways, I mean, the more things change, the more they remain the same. All we have to do is we have to walk over to where the customer is. And that's what we've done with the partnerships. Like in Amazon and Azure, we're saying look, we can even use your commits and credits. I mean, that is a very elegant way to go to where the customer is, rather than force them to where we are. And the public cloud is facing this too. They've come to realize in the last two years that they cannot force all of enterprise computing to come to hyperscalers data centers. They'll have to take in these bite-size smaller clouds to where the customer is, where the customer's machines are, where the customers people are, where the customers data is. That's where we also take to disperse the cloud itself. So I think there's going to be a yin yang where we'll try to walk with the customer to where we want them to be, whether it's hyperscaler data center or the notion of hybrid cloud infrastructure. But many a time, we've got to walk over to where they are. I mean, and outside the U.S, I mean, the cloud is such a nuanced word. I mean, we're talking about sovereignty, we're talking about data gravity, we're talking about economics of owning versus renting. This trifecta, the laws of the land, the laws of physics, and the laws of economics will dictate many of these things as well. So I think the big folks are also humble and vulnerable to realize that there's nothing more powerful than market forces. And I think the rest will take care of itself. >> Yeah, my quick commentary on that, Dheeraj, I think most of us look back at AT&T and felt the government got it wrong. The way they broke it up and ended up consolidating back together, it didn't necessarily help consumers. Microsoft on the other hand might've had a little bit too much power and was leveraging that against competition and really squashing innovation. So in general, it's good to see that the politics are looking at that and chore felt. The last time I watched things, they were a little bit more educated than some previous times there, where it was almost embarrassing to watch our representatives fumbling around with technology. So it's always good to question authority, question what they have. And one of the things you've brought up many times is you're open to listening and you're bringing in new ideas. I remember one conversation I had with you is there's that direction that you hold on to, but you will assess and do new data. You've made adjustments in the product portfolio and direction based on your customers, based on the ecosystem. And you've mentioned some of the, bring thoughts that you've brought into the company and you share. So you mentioned black swan that seem to head you brought to one of the European .NEXT shows. It was great to be able to see that author and read through advisors like Condoleezza Rice who you've had at the conferences a couple of times. Where are you getting some of your latest inspiration from, any new authors or podcasts that you'd be recommending to the audience? >> Yeah, I look at adjacencies, obviously Simon has been great. He was .NEXT, talked about the Infinite Game. And we'll talk about the Infinite Game with Nutanix too with respect to also my decision. But Brene Brown was been very close to Nutanix. I was just looking at her latest podcast, and she was sitting with the author of Stretch, Scott Sonnenschein, and it's a fascinating read and a great listen, by the way, I think for worth an hour, talking about scrappiness, and talking about resourcefulness. What does it mean to really be resourceful? And we need that even more so as we go through this recession, as we are sheltered in place. I think it's an adjacency to everything that Brene does. And I was just blown away by just listening to it. I'd a love for others to even have a listen and learn to understand what we can do within our families, with our budgets, with our companies, with our startups. I mean, with CUBE, I mean, what does it mean to be scrappy? And celebrate scrappiness and resourcefulness, more so than AI always need more. I think I just found it fascinating in the last week itself listening through it. >> John Farinacci talk many times that founder, startup, that being able to pull themselves up, be able to drive forward, overcome obstacles. So Dheeraj, do you tee it up? It sounds like is the next step for you. There's a transition under discussion. Bain has made an investment. There's a search for new CEO. Are you saying there's a book club in your future to be able to get things ready? Why don't you explain a little bit, 11 years took the company public, over 6,500 employees public company. So tell us a little bit about that decision-making process and what you expect to see in the future? >> Yeah, it's probably one of the hardest things as an entrepreneur is to let go, because it's a creation that you followed from scratch, from nothing. And it was a process for me to rethink about what's next for the company and then what's next for me? And me and the company were so tightly coupled that I was like, wow, at some point, this has to be a little bit more like the way Bill Gates did it with Microsoft, and there's going to be buton zone and you will then start to realize that your identity is different from the company's identity. And maybe the company is built for bigger, better things. And maybe you're built for bigger, better things. And how do you really start to first do this decoupling of the identity? And it's really hard. I mean, I'm sure that parents go through this. I mean, our children are still very young. Our eldest is nine going on 10 and our twin girls are six. I know at some point in the next 10 years, eight to 10 years, we'll have to figure out what it means to let go. And I'm already doing this with my son. I tell him you're born free. I mean, the word born free which drives my wife crazy sometimes. I say this to them, it's about independence. And I think the company is also born free to really think about a life outside of me, as well outside of founder. And that was a very important process for me as I was talking to the board for the last six, seven, eight months. And when the Bain deal came in, I thought it was a great time. We ended the fiscal really well, all things considered. We had a good quarter. The transition has been a journey of a lifetime, the business model transition I speak of. Really three years, I mean, I have aged probably 10 years in these last three years. But I think I would not replaced it for anything. Just the experience of learning what it means to change as a public company when you have short-term goals and long-term goals, we need the conviction, knowing what's right, because otherwise we would not have survived this cloud movement, all this idea of actually becoming a subscription company, changing the core of the business in the on-prem world itself. It's a king to change the wings of a plane at 40,000 feet where none of the passengers blink. It's been phenomenal ride last 11 years, but it's also been nonstop monomaniacal. I mean, I use the word marathon for this, and I figured it's a good time to say figure out a way to let go of this, and think of what's bigger better for Nutanix. And going from zero to a billion six in annual billings, and looking at billion six to 3 billion to four to five, I think it'd be great &to look at this from afar. And at the same time, I think there's vulnerability. I mean, I've made the company vulnerable. I've made myself vulnerable. We don't know who the next leader will be. And I think the next three to six months is one of the most important baton zones that I have ever experienced to be a part of. So looking forward to make sure that baton doesn't fall, redefine what good to great looks like, both for the company and for myself. And at the same time, go read more. I mean, I've been passionate about developers in the last 10 years, 11 years. I was a developer myself. This company, Nutanix, was really built by developers for IT. And I'm learning more about the developer as a consumer. How do you think about their experience? Not just the things that we throw at them from open source point of view and from cloud and technologies and AI and ML point of view, but really their lives, having them think about revenue and business and really blurring the lines between architects and product managers and developers. I think it's just an unfathomable problem we've created in IT that I would love to go and read and write more about. >> Yeah, so many important things you said there. I absolutely think that there are certain things everybody of course will think of you for a long time with Nutanix, but there is that separation between the role in the company and the person itself, and really appreciated how much you've always shared along those lines. So last question I have and you hit it up a little bit when you talked about developers. Take off your Nutanix hat for a second here, now what do we need to do to make sure that the next decade is successful in this space, cloud as a general guideline? Yes, we know we have skill gap. We know we need more people, we need more diversity. But there's so much that we need and there's so much opportunity, but what do you see and any advice areas that you think are critical for success in the future? >> Yeah, I mean, you hit up on something that I have had a passion for, probably more late in this world, more so than conspicuous, and and you hit upon it right now, diversity and inclusion. It's an unresolved problem in the developer community: the black developer, the woman developer. The idea of, I mean, we've two girls, they're twins. I'd love for them to embrace computer science and even probably do a PhD. I mean, I was a dropout. I'd love for them to do better than I did. Get, embrace things that are adjacent to biology and computer science. Go solve really hard problems. And we've not done those things. I mean, we've not looked at the community of developers and said, you know, they are the maker. And they work with managers and the maker manager world is two different worlds. How do you make this less friction? And how do you make this more delightful? And how do you think of developers as business, as if they are the folks who run the business? I think there's a lot that's missing there. And again, we throw a lot of jargons at them, and we talk a lot about automation and tools and such. But those are just things. I think the last 10, 11 years of me really just thinking about product and product portfolio and design and the fact that we have so many developers at Nutanix. I think it has been a mind-boggling experience, thinking about the why and the how and the what of the day in the life of, the month in the life of, and thinking about simple things like OKRs. I mean, we are throwing these jargons of OKRs at them: productivity, offshoring, remote work, over the zoom design sessions. It's just full of conflict and friction. So I think there is an amazing opportunity for Nutanix. There's an amazing opportunity for the industry to elevate this where the the woman developer can speak up in this world that's full of so many men. The black developer can speak up. And all of us can really think of this as something that's more structured, more productive, more revenue-driven, more customer in rather than developer out. That's really been some of the things that have been in my head, things that are still unresolved at Nutanix that I'm pretty sure at many of the places out there. That's what thinking and reading and writing about. >> Well, Dheeraj, first of all, thank you so much again for participating here. It's been great having you in theCUBE community, almost since the inception of us doing it back in 2010. Wish you the best of luck in the current transition. And absolutely look forward to talking more in the future. >> Thank you. And again, a big fan of the tremor rate of John, Dave, and you. Always learn so much from you, folks. Looking forward to be a constant student. Thank you. >> Thank you for joining us at theCUBE on Cloud. Lots more coverage here. Be sure to look throughout the site, engage in the chats, and give us your feedback. We're here to help you with the virtual events. I'm Stu Miniman as always. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Jan 5 2021

SUMMARY :

of the brand new technologies, in the last 10 years. and more like the enterprise. and the recession afterwards, and cheaper in the future. So that is the fundamental I don't miss the hotels. I mean the things that One of the other results, Dheeraj, I mean, at the end of the day, And one of the things you've and a great listen, by the and what you expect to see in the future? And I think the next three to six months and the person itself, and the fact that we have so in the current transition. And again, a big fan of the tremor rate engage in the chats, and

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

DheerajPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FarinacciPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Condoleezza RicePERSON

0.99+

NutanixORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

AT&TORGANIZATION

0.99+

Amazon.comORGANIZATION

0.99+

$5,000QUANTITY

0.99+

SimonPERSON

0.99+

BrenePERSON

0.99+

200%QUANTITY

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

nineQUANTITY

0.99+

Brene BrownPERSON

0.99+

Simon SinekPERSON

0.99+

Dheeraj PandeyPERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

eightQUANTITY

0.99+

2005DATE

0.99+

2010DATE

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

zeroQUANTITY

0.99+

Bill GatesPERSON

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

seven yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

40,000 feetQUANTITY

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

10QUANTITY

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

two girlsQUANTITY

0.99+

1950sDATE

0.99+

CongressORGANIZATION

0.99+

11 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

one-yearQUANTITY

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Infinite GameTITLE

0.99+

1940sDATE

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

StuPERSON

0.99+

over 6,500 employeesQUANTITY

0.99+

LinuxTITLE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

MoorePERSON

0.98+

last weekDATE

0.98+

U.S.LOCATION

0.98+

twin girlsQUANTITY

0.98+

CapExORGANIZATION

0.98+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.98+

U.SLOCATION

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

'95DATE

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

40 yearsDATE

0.98+

'91DATE

0.97+

Evolving Your Analytics Center of Excellence | Beyond.2020 Digital


 

>>Hello, everyone, and welcome to track three off beyond. My name is being in Yemen and I am an account executive here at Thought spot based out of our London office. If the accents throwing you off I don't quite sound is British is you're expecting it because the backgrounds Australian so you can look forward to seeing my face. As we go through these next few sessions, I'm gonna be introducing the guests as well as facilitating some of the Q and A. So make sure you come and say hi in the chat with any comments, questions, thoughts that you have eso with that I mean, this whole track, as the title somewhat gives away, is really about everything that you need to know and all the tips and tricks when it comes to adoption and making sure that your thoughts what deployment is really, really successful. We're gonna be taking off everything from user training on boarding new use cases and picking the right use cases, as well as hearing from our customers who have been really successful in during this before. So with that, though, I'm really excited to introduce our first guest, Kathleen Maley. She is a senior analytics executive with over 15 years of experience in the space. And she's going to be talking to us about all her tips and tricks when it comes to making the most out of your center of excellence from obviously an analytics perspective. So with that, I'm going to pass the mic to her. But look forward to continuing the chat with you all in the chat. Come say hi. >>Thank you so much, Bina. And it is really exciting to be here today, thanks to everyone for joining. Um, I'll jump right into it. The topic of evolving your analytics center of excellence is a particular passion of mine on I'm looking forward to sharing some of my best practices with you. I started my career, is a member of an analytic sioe at Bank of America was actually ah, model developer. Um, in my most recent role at a regional bank in the Midwest, I ran an entire analytics center of excellence. Um, but I've also been on the business side running my own P and l. So I think through this combination of experiences, I really developed a unique perspective on how to most effectively establish and work with an analytic CEO. Um, this thing opportunity is really a two sided opportunity creating value from analytics. Uh, and it really requires the analytics group and the line of business Thio come together. Each has a very specific role to play in making that happen. So that's a lot of what I'll talk about today. Um, I started out just like most analysts do formally trained in statistics eso whether your data analyst or a business leader who taps into analytical talent. I want you to leave this talk today, knowing the modern definition of analytics, the purpose of a modern sioe, some best practices for a modern sioe and and then the role that each of you plays in bringing this Kuito life. So with that said, let me start by level, setting on the definition of analytics that aligns with where the discipline is headed. Um, versus where it's been historically, analytics is the discovery, interpretation and communication of meaningful patterns in data, the connective tissue between data and effective decision making within an organization. And this is a definition that I've been working under for the last, you know, 7 to 10 years of my career notice there is nothing in there about getting the data. We're at this amazing intersection of statistics and technology that effectively eliminates getting the data as a competitive advantage on this is just It's true for analysts who are thinking in terms of career progression as it is for business leaders who have to deliver results for clients and shareholders. So the definition is action oriented. It's purposeful. It's not about getting the data. It's about influencing and enabling effective decision making. Now, if you're an analyst, this can be scary because it's likely what you spend a huge amount of your time doing, so much so that it probably feels like getting the data is your job. If that's the case, then the emergence of these new automated tools might feel like your job is at risk of becoming obsolete. If you're a business leader, this should be scary because it means that other companies air shooting out in front of you not because they have better ideas, necessarily, but because they can move so much faster. According to new research from Harvard Business Review, nearly 90% of businesses say the more successful when they equipped those at the front lines with the ability to make decisions in the moment and organizations who are leading their industries and embracing these decision makers are delivering substantial business value nearly 50% reporting increased customer satisfaction, employee engagement, improve product and service quality. So, you know, there there is no doubt that speed matters on it matters more and more. Um, but if you're feeling a little bit nervous, I want you to think of it. I want you think of it a little differently. Um, you think about the movie Hidden figures. The job of the women in hidden figures was to calculate orbital trajectories, uh, to get men into space and then get them home again. And at the start of the movie, they did all the required mathematical calculations by hand. At the end of the movie, when technology eliminated the need to do those calculations by hand, the hidden figures faced essentially the same decision many of you are facing now. Do I become obsolete, or do I develop a new set of, in their case, computer science skills required to keep doing the job of getting them into space and getting them home again. The hidden figures embraced the latter. They stayed relevant on They increase their value because they were able to doom or of what really mattered. So what we're talking about here is how do we embrace the new technology that UN burdens us? And how do we up skill and change our ways of working to create a step function increase in data enabled value and the first step, really In evolving your analytics? Dewey is redefining the role of analytics from getting the data to influencing and enabling effective decision making. So if this is the role of the modern analyst, a strategic thought partner who harnesses the power of data and directs it toward achieving specific business outcomes, then let's talk about how the series in which they operate needs change to support this new purpose. Um, first, historical CEOs have primarily been about fulfilling data requests. In this scenario, C always were often formed primarily as an efficiency measure. This efficiency might have come in the form of consistency funds, ability of resource is breaking down silos, creating and building multipurpose data assets. Um, and under the getting the data scenario that's actually made a lot of sense for modern Sealy's, however, the objective is to create an organization that supports strategic business decision ing for individuals and for the enterprises the whole. So let's talk about how we do that while maintaining the progress made by historical seaweeds. It's about really extending its extending what, what we've already done the progress we've already made. So here I'll cover six primary best practices. None is a silver bullet. Each needs to fit within your own company culture. But these air major areas to consider as you evolve your analytics capabilities first and foremost always agree on the purpose and approach of your Coe. Successfully evolving yourself starts with developing strategic partnerships with the business leaders that your organization will support that the analytics see we will support. Both parties need to explicitly blocked by in to the objective and agree on a set of operating principles on bond. I think the only way to do that is just bringing people to the table, having an open and honest conversation about where you are today, where you wanna be and then agree on how you will move forward together. It's not about your organization or my organization. How do we help the business solve problems that, you know, go beyond what what we've been able to do today? So moving on While there's no single organizational model that works for everyone, I generally favor a hybrid model that includes some level of fully dedicated support. This is where I distinguish between to whom the analyst reports and for whom the analyst works. It's another concept that is important to embrace in spirit because all of the work the analyst does actually comes from the business partner. Not from at least it shouldn't come from the head of the analytic Center of excellence. Andan analysts who are fully dedicated to a line of business, have the time in the practice to develop stronger partnerships to develop domain knowledge and history on those air key ingredients to effectively solving business problems. You, you know, how can you solve a problem when you don't really understand what it is? So is the head of an analytic sioe. I'm responsible for making sure that I hire the right mix of skills that I can effectively manage the quality of my team's work product. I've got a specialized skill set that allows me to do that, Um, that there's career path that matters to analysts on all of the other things that go along with Tele management. But when it comes to doing the work, three analysts who report to me actually work for the business and creating some consistency and stability there will make them much more productive. Um, okay, so getting a bit more, more tactical, um, engagement model answers the question. Who do I go to When? And this is often a question that business partners ask of a centralized analytics function or even the hybrid model. Who do I go to win? Um, my recommendation. Make it easy for them. Create a single primary point of contact whose job is to build relationships with a specific partner set of partners to become deeply embedded in their business and strategies. So they know why the businesses solving the problems they need to solve manage the portfolio of analytical work that's being done on behalf of the partner, Onda Geun. Make it make it easy for the partner to access the entire analytics ecosystem. Think about the growing complexity of of the current analytics ecosystem. We've got automated insights Business Analytics, Predictive modeling machine learning. Um, you Sometimes the AI is emerging. Um, you also then have the functional business questions to contend with. Eso This was a big one for me and my experience in retail banking. Uh, you know, if if I'm if I'm a deposits pricing executive, which was the line of business role that I ran on, I had a question about acquisitions through the digital channel. Do I talk Thio the checking analyst, Or do I talk to the digital analyst? Um, who owns that question? Who do I go to? Eso having dedicated POC s on the flip side also helps the head of the center of excellence actually manage. The team holistically reduces the number of entry points in the complexity coming in so that there is some efficiency. So it really is a It's a win win. It helps on both sides. Significantly. Um, there are several specific operating rhythms. I recommend each acting as a as a different gear in an integrated system, and this is important. It's an integrated decision system. All of these for operating rhythms, serves a specific purpose and work together. So I recommend a business strategy session. First, UM, a portfolio management routine, an internal portfolio review and periodic leadership updates, and I'll say a little bit more about each of those. So the business strategy session is used to set top level priorities on an annual or semiannual basis. I've typically done this by running half day sessions that would include a business led deep dive on their strategy and current priorities. Again, always remembering that if I'm going to try and solve all the business problem, I need to know what the business is trying to achieve. Sometimes new requester added through this process often time, uh, previous requests or de prioritized or dropped from the list entirely. Um, one thing I wanna point out, however, is that it's the partner who decides priorities. The analyst or I can guide and make recommendations, but at the end of the day, it's up to the business leader to decide what his or her short term and long term needs and priorities are. The portfolio management routine Eyes is run by the POC, generally on a biweekly or possibly monthly basis. This is where new requests or prioritize, So it's great if we come together. It's critical if we come together once or twice a year to really think about the big rocks. But then we all go back to work, and every day a new requests are coming up. That pipeline has to be managed in an intelligent way. So this is where the key people, both the analyst and the business partners come together. Thio sort of manage what's coming in, decking it against top priorities, our priorities changing. Um, it's important, uh, Thio recognize that this routine is not a report out. This routine is really for the POC who uses it to clarify questions. Raised risks facilitate decisions, um, from his partners with his or her partner so that the work continues. So, um, it should be exactly as long as it needs to be on. Do you know it's as soon as the POC has the information he or she needs to get back to work? That's what happens. An internal portfolio review Eyes is a little bit different. This this review is internal to the analytics team and has two main functions. First, it's where the analytics team can continue to break down silos for themselves and for their partners by talking to each other about the questions they're getting in the work that they're doing. But it's also the form in which I start to challenge my team to develop a new approach of asking why the request was made. So we're evolving. We're evolving from getting the data thio enabling effective business decision ing. Um, and that's new. That's new for a lot of analysts. So, um, the internal portfolio review is a safe space toe asks toe. Ask the people who work for May who report to May why the partner made this request. What is the partner trying to solve? Okay, senior leadership updates the last of these four routines, um, less important for the day to day, but significantly important for maintaining the overall health of the SIOE. I've usually done this through some combination of email summaries, but also standing agenda items on a leadership routine. Um, for for me, it is always a shared update that my partner and I present together. We both have our names on it. I typically talk about what we learned in the data. Briefly, my partner will talk about what she is going to do with it, and very, very importantly, what it is worth. Okay, a couple more here. Prioritization happens at several levels on Dive. Alluded to this. It happens within a business unit in the Internal Portfolio review. It has to happen at times across business units. It also can and should happen enterprise wide on some frequency. So within business units, that is the easiest. Happens most frequently across business units usually comes up as a need when one leader business leader has a significant opportunity but no available baseline analytical support. For whatever reason. In that case, we might jointly approach another business leader, Havenaar Oi, based discussion about maybe borrowing a resource for some period of time. Again, It's not my decision. I don't in isolation say, Oh, good project is worth more than project. Be so owner of Project Be sorry you lose. I'm taking those. Resource is that's It's not good practice. It's not a good way of building partnerships. Um, you know that that collaboration, what is really best for the business? What is best for the enterprise, um, is an enterprise decision. It's not a me decision. Lastly, enterprise level part ization is the probably the least frequent is aided significantly by the semi annual business strategy sessions. Uh, this is the time to look enterprise wide. It all of the business opportunities that play potential R a y of each and jointly decide where to align. Resource is on a more, uh, permanent basis, if you will, to make sure that the most important, um, initiatives are properly staffed with analytical support. Oxygen funding briefly, Um, I favor a hybrid model, which I don't hear talked about in a lot of other places. So first, I think it's really critical to provide each business unit with some baseline level of analytical support that is centrally funded as part of a shared service center of excellence. And if a business leader needs additional support that can't otherwise be provided, that leader can absolutely choose to fund an incremental resource from her own budget that is fully dedicated to the initiative that is important to her business. Um, there are times when that privatization happens at an enterprise level, and the collective decision is we are not going to staff this potentially worthwhile initiative. Um, even though we know it's worthwhile and a business leader might say, You know what? I get it. I want to do it anyway. And I'm gonna find budget to make that happen, and we create that position, uh, still reporting to the center of excellence for all of the other reasons. The right higher managing the work product. But that resource is, as all resource is, works for the business leader. Um, so, uh, it is very common thinking about again. What's the value of having these resource is reports centrally but work for the business leader. It's very common Thio here. I can't get from a business leader. I can't get what I need from the analytics team. They're too busy. My work falls by the wayside. So I have to hire my own people on. My first response is have we tried putting some of these routines into place on my second is you might be right. So fund a resource that's 100% dedicated to you. But let me use my expertise to help you find the right person and manage that person successfully. Um, so at this point, I I hope you see or starting to see how these routines really work together and how these principles work together to create a higher level of operational partnership. We collectively know the purpose of a centralized Chloe. Everyone knows his or her role in doing the work, managing the work, prioritizing the use of this very valuable analytical talent. And we know where higher ordered trade offs need to be made across the enterprise, and we make sure that those decisions have and those decision makers have the information and connectivity to the work and to each other to make those trade offs. All right, now that we've established the purpose of the modern analyst and the functional framework in which they operate, I want to talk a little bit about the hard part of getting from where many individual analysts and business leaders are today, uh, to where we have the opportunity to grow in order to maintain pain and or regain that competitive advantage. There's no judgment here. It's simply an artifact. How we operate today is simply an artifact of our historical training, the technology constraints we've been under and the overall newness of Applied analytics as a distinct discipline. But now is the time to start breaking away from some of that and and really upping our game. It is hard not because any of these new skills is particularly difficult in and of themselves. But because any time you do something, um, for the first time, it's uncomfortable, and you're probably not gonna be great at it the first time or the second time you try. Keep practicing on again. This is for the analyst and for the business leader to think differently. Um, it gets easier, you know. So as a business leader when you're tempted to say, Hey, so and so I just need this data real quick and you shoot off that email pause. You know it's going to help them, and I'll get the answer quicker if I give him a little context and we have a 10 minute conversation. So if you start practicing these things, I promise you will not look back. It makes a huge difference. Um, for the analyst, become a consultant. This is the new set of skills. Uh, it isn't as simple as using layman's terms. You have to have a different conversation. You have to be willing to meet your business partner as an equal at the table. So when they say, Hey, so and so can you get me this data You're not allowed to say yes. You're definitely not is not to say no. Your reply has to be helped me understand what you're trying to achieve, so I can better meet your needs. Andi, if you don't know what the business is trying to achieve, you will never be able to help them get there. This is a must have developed project management skills. All of a sudden, you're a POC. You're in charge of keeping track of everything that's coming in. You're in charge of understanding why it's happening. You're responsible for making sure that your partner is connected across the rest of the analytics. Um, team and ecosystem that takes some project management skills. Um, be business focused, not data focused. Nobody cares what your algorithm is. I hate to break it to you. We love that stuff on. We love talking about Oh, my gosh. Look, I did this analysis, and I didn't think this is the way I was gonna approach it, and I did. I found this thing. Isn't it amazing? Those are the things you talk about internally with your team because when you're doing that, what you're doing is justifying and sort of proving the the rightness of your answer. It's not valuable to your business partner. They're not going to know what you're talking about anyway. Your job is to tell them what you found. Drawing conclusions. Historically, Analyst spent so much of their time just getting data into a power 0.50 pages of summarized data. Now the job is to study that summarized data and draw a conclusion. Summarized data doesn't explain what's happening. They're just clues to what's happening. And it's your job as the analyst to puzzle out that mystery. If a partner asked you a question stated in words, your answer should be stated in words, not summarized data. That is a new skill for some again takes practice, but it changes your ability to create value. So think about that. Your job is to put the answer on page with supporting evidence. Everything else falls in the cutting room floor, everything. Everything. Everything has to be tied to our oi. Um, you're a cost center and you know, once you become integrated with your business partner, once you're working on business initiatives, all of a sudden, this actually becomes very easy to do because you will know, uh, the business case that was put forth for that business initiative. You're part of that business case. So it becomes actually again with these routines in place with this new way of working with this new way of thinking, it's actually pretty easy to justify and to demonstrate the value that analytic springs to an organization. Andi, I think that's important. Whether or not the organization is is asking for it through formalized reporting routine Now for the business partner, understand that this is a transformation and be prepared to support it. It's ultimately about providing a higher level of support to you, but the analysts can't do it unless you agree to this new way of working. So include your partner as a member of your team. Talk to them about the problems you're trying to sell to solve. Go beyond asking for the data. Be willing and able to tie every request to an overarching business initiative on be poised for action before solution is commissioned. This is about preserving. The precious resource is you have at your disposal and you know often an extra exploratory and let it rip. Often, an exploratory analysis is required to determine the value of a solution, but the solution itself should only be built if there's a plan, staffing and funding in place to implement it. So in closing, transformation is hard. It requires learning new things. It also requires overriding deeply embedded muscle memory. The more you can approach these changes is a team knowing you won't always get it right and that you'll have to hold each other accountable for growth, the better off you'll be and the faster you will make progress together. Thanks. >>Thank you so much, Kathleen, for that great content and thank you all for joining us. Let's take a quick stretch on. Get ready for the next session. Starting in a few minutes, you'll be hearing from thought spots. David Coby, director of Business Value Consulting, and Blake Daniel, customer success manager. As they discuss putting use cases toe work for your business

Published Date : Dec 10 2020

SUMMARY :

But look forward to continuing the chat with you all in the chat. This is for the analyst and for the business leader to think differently. Get ready for the next session.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
KathleenPERSON

0.99+

Kathleen MaleyPERSON

0.99+

David CobyPERSON

0.99+

YemenLOCATION

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

10 minuteQUANTITY

0.99+

Blake DanielPERSON

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

Bank of AmericaORGANIZATION

0.99+

LondonLOCATION

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

DeweyPERSON

0.99+

7QUANTITY

0.99+

EachQUANTITY

0.99+

MayDATE

0.99+

Both partiesQUANTITY

0.99+

0.50 pagesQUANTITY

0.99+

eachQUANTITY

0.99+

ThioPERSON

0.99+

both sidesQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

nearly 50%QUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

Hidden figuresTITLE

0.99+

over 15 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

second timeQUANTITY

0.98+

first guestQUANTITY

0.98+

onceQUANTITY

0.98+

nearly 90%QUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

BinaPERSON

0.98+

singleQUANTITY

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

MidwestLOCATION

0.97+

three analystsQUANTITY

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

first responseQUANTITY

0.96+

two sidedQUANTITY

0.94+

ChloePERSON

0.92+

first stepQUANTITY

0.92+

half dayQUANTITY

0.91+

Business Value ConsultingORGANIZATION

0.9+

POCORGANIZATION

0.9+

two main functionsQUANTITY

0.89+

each business unitQUANTITY

0.88+

twice a yearQUANTITY

0.86+

coupleQUANTITY

0.81+

SealyORGANIZATION

0.8+

ThoughtORGANIZATION

0.77+

AndiPERSON

0.76+

six primary bestQUANTITY

0.76+

one leaderQUANTITY

0.7+

OndaPERSON

0.68+

threeQUANTITY

0.68+

ReviewORGANIZATION

0.66+

biweeklyQUANTITY

0.65+

AustralianOTHER

0.63+

four routinesQUANTITY

0.61+

Havenaar OiORGANIZATION

0.6+

GeunORGANIZATION

0.59+

HarvardORGANIZATION

0.54+

BusinessTITLE

0.51+

BritishLOCATION

0.5+

Beyond.2020OTHER

0.5+

SIOETITLE

0.39+

SpotIQ | Beyond.2020 Digital


 

>>Yeah, yeah. >>Hello and welcome back. You're just in time for our third session spot. I Q amplify your insights with AI in this session will explore how AI gets you to the why of your data capturing changes and trends in the moment they happen. >>You'll >>start to understand how you can transform your data culture by making it easier for analysts to enable business users to consume insights in real time. >>You >>might think this all sounds too good to be true. Well, since seeing is believing, we're joined by thought spots. Vika Scrotum, senior product manager. Anak Shaped Mirror, principal product manager to walk you through all of this on MAWR. Over to you actually, >>Thank you. Wanna Hello, everyone. Welcome to the session. I am Action Hera, together with my colleague because today we will talk to you about how spot I Q uses a. I to generate meaningful insights for the users Before we dwell into that. Let's see why this is becoming so important. Your business and your data is growing and moving faster than ever. Data is considered the new oil Howard. Only those will benefit who can extract value of it. The data used in most of your organization's is just the tip of the iceberg beneath the tip of the iceberg. What you don't see or what you don't know to ask. That makes the difference in this data driven world. Let's learn how one can extract maximum value of the data to make smarter business decisions. We believe that analytics should require less input while producing more output with higher quality in a traditional approach. To be honest, users generally depend on somebody else to create data models, complex data queries to get answers to their pre anticipated questions. But solution like hot spot business users already have a Google like experience where they can just go and get answers to their questions. Now, if you look at other consumer applications, there are multiple of recommendation engines which are out there, which keep recommending. Which article should I read next? Which product should I buy? Which movie should I watch in a way, helping me optimized? Where should I focus my time on in a Similarly in analytics, as your data is growing, solutions must help users uncovered insights to questions which they may not ask, we believe, and a I automated insights will help users unleash the full potential off their data Across the spectrum, we see a potential in a smart, AI driven solution toe autonomously. Monitor your data and feed in relevant insights when you need them, much like a self driving car navigates our users safely to their desired destination. With this, yeah, I'm happy to introduce you to spot like you are a driven insights engine at scale, which will help you get full potential off your data like you automatically discovers, personalize and drive insights hidden in your data. So whenever you search to create answers, spot that you continues to ask a lot more questions on your behalf as it keeps drilling and related date dimensions and measures employed insights which may be of interest to you. Now you as a user can continue to ask your questions or can dig deeper into the inside, provided by spotted you Spartak. You also provides a comprehensive set of insights, which helps user get answers to their advance business questions. In a few clicks, so spotted it. You can help you detect any outlier, for example, spot that you can not only tell you which seller has the highest returns than others, but also which product that sellers selling has higher returns than other products. Or, like you can quickly detect any trends in your data and help us answer questions like how my account sign ups are trending after my targeted campaign is over. I can quickly use for, like, toe get unanswered how my open pipeline is related to my bookings amount and what's the like there. What it means is that how much time a lead will take to convert into a deal I can use partake. You, too, create multiple clusters off my all my customer base and then get answers to questions that which customer segment is buying which particular brand and what are the attributes last and the most used feature Key drivers of change spotted you helps you get answer to a question. What factors lead to the change in sales off a store in 2020 as compared to 2019? We can do all this and simple fix. That's barbecue. What is so unique about Spartak? You how it works hand in hand with our search experience, the more you search, the smarter. The spot that you get as it keeps learning from your usage behavior on generates relevant insights for you for your users. Spartak. You ensures that users can trust every insights. A generator. It broadly does this and broadly, two ways. It keeps their insights relevant by learning the underlying data model on. By incorporating the users feedback that is, users can provide feedback to the spot I Q similar to any social media back from, they can like watching sites they find useful on dislike. What insights Do not find it useful based on users. Feedback Spot like you can downgrade any insight if the users have not find it useful. In addition to that, users can dig deep into any Spartak you insight on all calculations behind it are available for a user to look and understand. The transparency in these calculations not only increases the analytical trust among the users, but also help them learn how they can use the search bar to do much more. I'm super excited to announce Partake you is now available on embrace so our automated A insights engine can run queries life and in database on these datasets so you do not need to bring your data to thoughts about as you connect your data sources. Touch Part performs full indexing value to the data you have selected, not just the headers in the material and as you run sport in Q, it optimizes and run efficient queries on your data warehouse on. I am super pleased to introduce you. This new spot like you monitor the spot that you monitor will enable all your users to keep track of their key metrics. Spartak, you monitor will not only provide them regular updates off their key metrics, but we also analyze all the underlying data on related dimensions to help them explain. What is leading to the change of a particular metric monitor will also be available on your mobile app so that you can keep track of your metrics whenever and wherever you go, because will talk for further detail about this during the demo. So now let's see Spartak in action. But before we go there, let's meet any. Amy is an analyst at a global retail about form. Amy is preparing for her quarterly sales review meeting with the management, so Amy has to report how the sales has meat performing how, what, what factors lead to the change in the sales? And if there are any other impressing insights, which everyone should off tell to the management? So but this Let's see how immigrant use part like you to prepare for the meeting. So Amy goes to that spot, chooses the sales data set for her company. But before we see how many users what I Q to prepare for the meeting. I just wanted to highlight that all this data which we're going to talk about is residing in Snowflake. >>So >>Touch Part is going to do a life query on the snowflake database on even spot. A Q analysis will run on the Snowflake databases, so we'll go back and see how you can use it. So Amy is preparing for the sales meeting for 2019. We just ended. So images right Sales 2019 on here. She has the graph of the Continent tickets, >>so >>what she does is immediately pence it >>for >>the report. She's creating Andi now. This graph is available >>there now. >>Any Monnet observed >>that >>the Q four sales is significantly higher than Q >>three, so >>you she wants to deep dive into this. So she just select these two data points and does the right click and runs particularities. So now, as we talked earlier, Spartak, you recommends which columns Spartak Things Will best explains this change >>on. >>Not only that, you can look that Spartacus automatically understood that Amy is trying toe identify what led to this change. So the change analysis we selected So now with this, >>Amy >>has a bit more business context when he realizes that she doesn't want to add these columns. So she's been using because she thinks this is too granular for the management right now. >>If >>she wants, she can add even more columns. All columns are available for her, and she can reduce columns. So now she runs 42 analysis. So while this product Unisys is running, what the system will do with the background, this part I Q will drill across all the dimensions, which any is selected and try to explain the difference, which is approximately $10 million in sales. So let's see if Amy's report is ready. Yeah, so with this, what's product you has done is protect you has drilled across all dimensions. Amy has selected and presented how the different values in these dimensions have changed. So it's product. You will not only tell you which values in these dimensions have changed the most, but also does an attribution that how much of this change has led to the overall change scenes. So here in the first inside sport accuse telling that 10 products have the largest change out of the 3 45 values and the account for 39% increase. Overall, there has been look by the prototype category. It's saying that five product types of the largest change out of the 15 values, and they account for 98.6% of total increase. And they're not saying the sailors increased their also demonstrating that in some categories the sales has actually decreased to ensure the sales has decreased. Amy finds this inside should be super useful so immediately pins this on the same pain, but she was preparing for and she's getting ready with that. Amy also wants to dig deeper into this inside. My name goes here. She sees that spot. I Q has not only calculated the change across these product types, but has also calculated person did change. So Amy immediately sorts this by wasn't did change. And then she notices that even though Sweater as a category as a prototype, was not appearing in the change analysis but has the most significant change in terms of percentage in comparison to Q two vs Q four. So she also wants to do this so she can just quickly change the title. And she can pin this insight as well under spin board for the management to look at with this done. Now, Amy, just want to go back to this sales and see if she can find anything else interesting. So now Amy has already figured out the possible causes. What led to the increase in sales? So now, for the whole of 2019, as this is also your closing, Amy looks, uh, the monthly figures for 2019, and she gets this craft now. If Amy has to understand, if there is an interesting insight, she can dig into different dimensions and figure out on her own or immigrant, just click on this product analysis. That's product immediately suggest all the dimensions and measures immigrant analyze sales by Andi many. We will run this What will happen is this barbecue system will try to identify outliers. The different trend analysis Onda cross correlation across different measures. So Amy again realizes that this is a bit too much for her. So she reduces some of these insights, which she thinks are not required for the management right now from the business context and the business meeting. And then she just immediately runs this analysis. So now, with this, Amy is hoping to get some interesting insights from Spartak, which immigrant present to her management meeting. Let's see what sport gets for her. So now the Alice is run within 10 seconds, so spot taken started analyzing. So these are the six anomaly sport like you found across different products, where their total sales are higher than the rest. He also founded Spot. I just found eight insights off different product types which has tired total sales and look across these enemy sees that oh jackets have against the highest sales across all the categories in December as well. Amy wants toe been this to the PIN board on M. It moves further now. Amy's is that it has also shown Total Country purchased their product a me thinks this is not a useful insights. Amy can get this feedback. The system and system asked, Why are you saying you don't find this useful so the system can remember? So you can also say that anomalies are obvious right now and give this feedback and the system will remember. In addition, Amy finds that the system has automatically correlated the total sales in total contrary purchase. Amy Pence this as well to the pin board. Andi. She loves this inside where she she is that not only the total sales have increased, but total quantity purchases have increased a lot more on their training, opposed as well. So she also opens this now anything. She is ready for her meeting with the management. So she just goes and shares the PIN board, which she just created with the management. And you know what happens immediately? The jacket sales category Manager Mr Tom replies back to Amy and says in the request, Any d really like this? So now we will see how Spartak you can help any educators as request doesn't mean really need to create these kind of reports every month to cater toe Tom's request. So with this, I will handle it because to take us walk us through How spot that you can cater this request. Hi, >>everyone. So analysts like Amy are always flooded with such requests from the business users and with Spot and you monitor. Amy can set up everyone who needs updates on a on a metric in just a few simple steps and enable them to drag these metrics whenever and wherever they want. And north of the metrics, they also get the corresponding change analysis on the device off their choice with hot Spot. What I give money being available on both Web and the mobile labs. So let's get started with the demo will be set up a meet and go to the search tab and creator times we start for the metrics you want to monitor, right? And please know if the charges already created is already created. All is available is, um, usually a section in a PIN board. Also dancer. Then there's no need to create a new child. She can simply then uh, right click on the chart and select moisture from the menu, which then shows, which then shows the breakdown off the metric he's going to monitor, including the measure. What it's been grouped by on what it is filtered on. Okay, and also as this is a weekly metric, all the subscribers are going to get a weekly notification for this metric had been a monthly metric. Then the notifications would have been delivered on a monthly cadence. Next she can click on, continue and go to the configure dimensions called on Page. Here A is recommending what all dimensions could best being the change in this metric, she can go ahead with default recommendation, or she can change the columns as she seems very she can click, she conflict, continue and go to the next page, which is the subscriber stage. It is added by default to the subscriber, but she can search everyone who needs update on this metric and add them on this metric by clicking confirmed, she'll see a toast message on the bottom of the page, taking on which will take a me to this page, which is a metric detail page On the top of this page, we can see the movement of the metric and how it is changing over time, 92 you can see that the Mets jacket, since number has increased by 2.5% in the week off 23rd of December has compared toa the week off 16th of December and just below e a has invaded the man is generated in sites which are readily available for consumption. Okay to discharge. Right here says that pain products have the largest change out of all the 28 values and contributes to the 88% of the total increase in the same. And this one right here is that Midwest is the larger Midwest has the largest change and accounts for 55.66% off the total increase. Now, all this goodness is also available on the mobile lab. Right? So let me just show you how business users are going to get notified on the based. On this metric, all the business users who are subscribed to this metric are going to get a regular email as well as push notifications on the mobile lab. And when the click on this, they line on a metric detail page which has all the starts, which I just showed you on the on the bed version, okay. And one cyclic on back burden. They land on this page, which is a monitor tab, and it summarizes all the metrics Which opportunity monitoring and gives them a whole gave you to stay all I want to stay on top of their businesses. Okay. Eso that folks was monitor. Now I'll search back to slaves and cover. Summarize the key takeaways. From what? That she and I just don't know. So it's part of you wanted, uh, Summit Spartak you. It automatically discovers insights and helps you unless the full potential of your data and that's what I do is comprehensive set off analysis. You can answer your advanced business question in just a few simple steps and the end speed of your time. Bring state. And with a new support for embrace, you can run sport like you on your data in your data warehouse and with spotted you monitor, you can monitor all the business metrics and not just died. We can also understand that teaching teaching drivers on those metrics on the platform of your choice. So with that, I'll hand over toe, you know. >>Thank you so much. Both of you That was fantastic. Um, I just love spot like, because it makes me look like much more of a rock star with data than I really am. So thank you guys for that fantastic presentation. Um, so we've got a couple of minutes for a couple of questions for you. The first one is for action. Um, once spot I Q generates a number of insights. Can you run spot I Q again on one of those insights? >>Yeah, As a philosophy off Spiric, you sport like you never takes the user to the dead end Spartak. You also transparently shares the calculation. So user can not only the keeper that on edit Understand how this product you inside has been calculated, but user can also run us for like you analysts is honest for data analysis as well. Which music? And continue to do not on the first level. Second level in the third level as well. >>That's cool. Thank you. Actually on then The next one is for because for spot ik monitor is it possible to edit the dimensions used for explaining the factors to change that was detected? >>Yes. It's an owner of the metric you can change the dimensions whenever you want and save them for everyone else. >>Okay, well, I think that's about all we've got time for in this session. So all that remains is for me to say a huge thank you to Because an Akshay Andi, we've got the last session of this track coming up in a few minutes. So grab a snack. Come right back and listen to an amazing customer story with Snowflake on Western Union, they're up next.

Published Date : Dec 10 2020

SUMMARY :

explore how AI gets you to the why of your data capturing changes and trends start to understand how you can transform your data culture by making it easier for analysts Anak Shaped Mirror, principal product manager to walk you through all of this on insights engine at scale, which will help you get full potential off your data like So Amy is preparing for the sales meeting for 2019. the report. as we talked earlier, Spartak, you recommends which columns Spartak Things Will So the change analysis we selected So now with this, So she's been using because she thinks this is too granular for the management right now. So now we will see how Spartak you to the search tab and creator times we start for the metrics you want to monitor, Both of you That was fantastic. keeper that on edit Understand how this product you inside has been calculated, the dimensions used for explaining the factors to change that was detected? and save them for everyone else. So all that remains is for me to say a huge thank you to Because

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AmyPERSON

0.99+

DecemberDATE

0.99+

Vika ScrotumPERSON

0.99+

TomPERSON

0.99+

10 productsQUANTITY

0.99+

55.66%QUANTITY

0.99+

39%QUANTITY

0.99+

98.6%QUANTITY

0.99+

15 valuesQUANTITY

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

2.5%QUANTITY

0.99+

Amy PencePERSON

0.99+

88%QUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

third levelQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

first levelQUANTITY

0.99+

Second levelQUANTITY

0.99+

six anomalyQUANTITY

0.99+

28 valuesQUANTITY

0.99+

approximately $10 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

five productQUANTITY

0.99+

92QUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

AndiPERSON

0.99+

two data pointsQUANTITY

0.99+

UnisysORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

42 analysisQUANTITY

0.99+

third sessionQUANTITY

0.99+

3 45 valuesQUANTITY

0.99+

Anak Shaped MirrorPERSON

0.98+

SpartakORGANIZATION

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

first oneQUANTITY

0.97+

two waysQUANTITY

0.97+

eight insightsQUANTITY

0.96+

Q twoOTHER

0.95+

oneQUANTITY

0.94+

Q fourOTHER

0.93+

23rd of DecemberDATE

0.93+

HowardORGANIZATION

0.93+

16th of DecemberDATE

0.92+

threeQUANTITY

0.92+

SpotORGANIZATION

0.92+

Western UnionLOCATION

0.91+

SnowflakeLOCATION

0.85+

MetsORGANIZATION

0.85+

SnowflakeORGANIZATION

0.85+

Akshay AndiPERSON

0.84+

Summit SpartakORGANIZATION

0.83+

SpartakTITLE

0.81+

SpotIQORGANIZATION

0.8+

MidwestLOCATION

0.8+

10 secondsQUANTITY

0.79+

SpartakPERSON

0.75+

WanPERSON

0.71+

one cyclicQUANTITY

0.69+

Action HeraORGANIZATION

0.66+

MAWRORGANIZATION

0.65+

AlicePERSON

0.61+

Deep Dive into ThoughtSpot One | Beyond.2020 Digital


 

>>Yeah, >>yeah. Hello and welcome to this track to creating engaging analytics experiences for all. I'm Hannah Sinden Thought spots Omiya director of marketing on. I'm delighted to have you here today. A boy Have we got to show for you now? I might be a little bit biased as the host of this track, but in my humble opinion, you've come to a great place to start because this track is all about everything. Thought spot. We'll be talking about embedded search in a I thought spot one spot I. Q. We've got great speakers from both thoughts about andare customers as well as some cool product demos. But it's not all product talk. We'll be looking at how to leverage the tech to give your users a great experience. So first up is our thoughts about one deep dive. This session will be showing you how we've built on our already superb search experience to make it even easier for users across your company to get insight. We've got some great speakers who are going to be telling you about the cool stuff they've been working on to make it really fantastic and easy for non technical people to get the answers they need. So I'm really delighted to introduce Bob Baxley s VP of design and experience That thought spot on Vishal Kyocera Thought spots director of product management. So without further ado, I'll hand it over to Bob. Thanks, >>Hannah. It's great to be here with everybody today and really excited to be able to present to you thought spot one. We've been working on this for months and months and are super excited to share it before we get to the demo with Shawl, though, I just want to set things up a little bit to help people understand how we think about design here. A thought spot. The first thing is that we really try to think in terms of thought. Spot is a consumer grade product, terms what we wanted. Consumer grade you x for an analytics. And that means that for reference points rather than looking at other enterprise software companies, we tend to look at well known consumer brands like Google, YouTube and WhatsApp. We firmly believe that people are people, and it doesn't matter if they're using software for their own usage or thought are they're using software at work We wanted to have a great experience. The second piece that we were considering with thoughts about one is really what we call the desegregation of bundles. So instead of having all of your insights wraps strictly into dashboards, we want to allow users to get directly to individual answers. This is similar to what we saw in music. Were instead of you having to buy the entire album, of course, you could just buy individual songs. You see this in iTunes, Spotify and others course. Another key idea was really getting rid of gate keepers and curators and kind of changing people from owning the information, helping enable users to gather together the most important and interesting insights So you can follow curator rather than feeling like you're limited in the types of information you can get. And finally, we wanted to make search the primary way, for people are thinking about thought spot. As you'll see, we've extended search from beyond simply searching for your data toe, also searching to be able to find pin boards and answers that have been created by other people. So with that, I'll turn it over to my good friend Rachel Thio introduce more of thought, spot one and to show you a demo of the product. >>Thank you, Bob. It's a pleasure to be here to Hello, everyone. My name is Michelle and Andy, product management for Search. And I'm really, really excited to be here talking about thoughts about one our Consumer analytics experience in the Cloud. Now, for my part of the talk, we're gonna first to a high level overview of thoughts about one. Then we're going to dive into a demo, and then we're gonna close with just a few thoughts about what's coming next. So, without any today, let's get started now at thought spot. Our mission is to empower every user regardless of their expertise, to easily engage with data on make better data driven decisions. We want every user, the nurse, the neighborhood barista, the teacher, the sales person, everyone to be able to do their jobs better by using data now with thoughts about one. We've made it even more intuitive for all these business users to easily connect with the insights that are most relevant for them, and we've made it even easier for analysts to do their jobs more effectively and more efficiently. So what does thoughts about one have? There's a lot off cool new features, but they all fall into three main categories. The first main category is enhanced search capabilities. The second is a brand new homepage that's built entirely for you, and the third is powerful tools for the analysts that make them completely self service and boost their productivity. So let's see how these work Thought Spot is the pioneer for search driven analytics. We invented search so that business users can ask questions of data and create new insights. But over the years we realized that there was one key piece off functionality that was missing from our search, and that was the ability to discover insights and content that had already been created. So to clarify, our search did allow users to create new content, but we until now did not have the ability to search existing content. Now, why does that matter? Let's take an example. I am a product manager and I am always in thought spot, asking questions to better understand how are users are using the product so we can improve it now. Like me, A lot of my colleagues are doing the same thing. Ah, lot of questions that I asked have already been answered either completely are almost completely by many of my colleagues, but until now there's been no easy way for me to benefit from their work. And so I end up recreating insights that already exists, leading to redundant work that is not good for the productivity off the organization. In addition, even though our search technology is really intuitive, it does require a little bit of familiarity with the underlying data. You do need to know what metric you care about and what grouping you care about so that you can articulate your questions and create new insights. Now, if I consider in New employees product manager who joins Hotspot today and wants to ask questions, then the first time they use thought spot, they may not have that data familiarity. So we went back to the drawing board and asked ourselves, Well, how can we augment our search so that we get rid off or reduced the redundant work that I described? And in addition, empower users, even new users with very little expertise, maybe with no data familiarity, to succeed in getting answers to their questions the first time they used Hot Spot, and we're really proud and excited to announce search answers. Search answers allows users to search across existing content to get answers to their questions, and its a great compliment to search data, which allows them to search the underlying data directly to create new content. Now, with search answers were shipping in number of cool features like Answer Explainer, Personalized search Results, Answer Explorer, etcetera that make it really intuitive and powerful. And we'll see how all of these work in action in the demo. Our brand new homepage makes it easier than ever for all these business users to connect with the insights that are most relevant to them. These insights could be insights that these users already know about and want to track regularly. For example, as you can see, the monitor section at the top center of the screen thes air, the KP eyes that I may care most about, and I may want to look at them every day, and I can see them every day right here on my home page. By the way, there's a monitoring these metrics in the bankrupt these insights that I want to connect with could also be insights that I want to know more about the search experience that I just spoke about ISS seamlessly integrated into the home page. So right here from the home page, I can fire my searchers and ask whatever questions I want. Finally, and most interestingly, the homepage also allows me to connect with insights that I should know about, even if I didn't explicitly ask for them. So what's an example? If you look at the panel on the right, I can discover insights that are trending in my organization. If I look at the panel on the left, I can discover insights based on my social graph based on the people that I'm following. Now you might wonder, How do we create this personalized home page? Well, our brand new, personalized on boarding experience makes it a piece of cake as a new business user. The very first time I log into thought spot, I pay three people I want to follow and three metrics that I want to follow, and I picked these from a pool of suggestions that Ai has generated. And just like that, the new home page gets created. And let's not forget about analysts. We have a personalized on boarding experience specifically for analysts that's optimized for their needs. Now, speaking of analysts, I do want to talk about the tools that I spoke off earlier that made the analysts completely self service and greatly boost their productivity's. We want analysts to go from zero to search in less than 30 minutes, and with our with our new augmented data modeling features and thoughts about one, they can do just that. They get a guided experience where they can connect, model and visualize their data. With just a few clicks, our AI engine takes care off a number of tasks, including figuring out joints and, you know, cleaning up column names. In fact, our AI engine also helps them create a number of answers to get started quickly so that these analysts can spend their time and energy on what matters most answering the most complicated and challenging and impactful questions for the business. So I spoke about a number of different capabilities off thoughts about one, but let's not forget that they are all packaged in a delightful user experience designed by Bob and his team, and it powers really, really intuitive and powerful user flows, from personalized on boarding to searching to discover insights that already exist on that are ranked based on personalized algorithms to making refinements to these insights with a assistance to searching, to create brand new insights from scratch. And finally sharing all the insights that you find interesting with your colleagues so that it drives conversations, decisions and, most importantly, actions so that your business can improve. With that said, let's drive right into the demo for this demo. We're going to use sales data set for a company that runs a chain off retail stores selling apparel. Our user is a business user. Her name is Charlotte. She's a merchandiser, She's new to this company, and she is going to be leading the genes broader category. She's really excited about job. She wants to use data to make better decisions, so she comes to thought spot, and this is what she sees. There are three main sections on the home page that she comes to. The central section allows you to browse through items that she has access to and filter them in various ways. Based for example, on author or on tags or based on what she has favorited. The second section is this panel on the right hand side, which allows her to discover insights that are trending within her company. This is based on what other people within her company are viewing and also personalized to her. Finally, there's this search box that seamlessly integrated into the home page. Now Charlotte is really curious to learn how the business is doing. She wants to learn more about sales for the business, so she goes to the search box and searches for sales, and you can see that she's taken to a page with search results. Charlotte start scanning the search results, and she sees the first result is very relevant. It shows her what the quarterly results were for the last year, but the result that really catches her attention is regional sales. She'd love to better understand how sales are broken down by regions. Now she's interested in the search result, but she doesn't yet want to commit to clicking on it and going to that result. She wants to learn more about this result before she does that, and she could do that very easily simply by clicking anywhere on the search result card. Doing that reveals our answer. Explain our technology and you can see this information panel on the right side. It shows more details about the search results that she selected, and it also gives her an easy to understand explanation off the data that it contains. You can see that it tells her that the metrics sales it's grouped by region and splitter on last year. She can also click on this preview button to see a preview off the chart that she would see if she went to that result. It shows her that region is going to be on the X axis and sales on the Y axis. All of this seems interesting to her, and she wants to learn more. So she clicks on this result, and she's brought to this chart now. This contains the most up to date data, and she can interact with this data. Now, as she's looking at this data, she learns that Midwest is the region with the highest sales, and it has a little over $23 million in sales, and South is the region with the lowest sales, and it has about $4.24 million in sales. Now, as Charlotte is looking at this chart, she's reminded off a conversation she had with Suresh, another new hire at the company who she met at orientation just that morning. Suresh is responsible for leading a few different product categories for the Western region off the business, and she thinks that he would find this chart really useful Now she can share this chart with Suresh really easily from right here by clicking the share button. As Charlotte continues to look at this chart and understand the data, she thinks, uh, that would be great for her to understand. How do these sales numbers across regions look for just the genes product category, since that's the product category that she is going to be leading? And she can easily narrow this data to just the genes category by using her answer Explorer technology. This panel on the right hand side allows her to make the necessary refinements. Now she can do that simply by typing in the search box, or she can pick from one off the AI generated suggestions that are personalized for her now. In this case, the AI has already suggested genes as a prototype for her. So with just a single click, she can narrow the data to show sales data for just jeans broken down by region. And she can see that Midwest is still the region with the highest sales for jeans, with $1.35 million in sales. Now let's spend a minute thinking about what we just saw. This is the first time that Charlotte is using Thought spot. She does not know anything about the data sources. She doesn't know anything about measures or attributes. She doesn't know the names of the columns. And yet she could get to insights that are relevant for her really easily using a search interface that's very much like Google. And as she started interacting with search results, she started building a slightly better understanding off the underlying data. When she found an insight that she thought would be useful to a colleague offers, it was really seamless for her to share it with that colleague from where she Waas. Also, even though she's searching over content that has already been created by her colleagues in search answers. She was in no way restricted to exactly that data as we just saw. She could refine the data in an insight that she found by narrowing it. And there's other things you can do so she could interact with the data for the inside that she finds using search answers. Let's take a slightly more complex question that Charlotte may have. Let's assume she wanted to learn about sales broken down by, um, by category so that she can compare her vertical, which is jeans toe other verticals within the company. Again, she can see that the very first result that she gets is very relevant. It shows her search Sorry, sales by category for last year. But what really catches her attention about this result is the name of the author. She's thrilled to note that John, who is the author of this result, was also an instructor for one off for orientation sessions and clearly someone who has a lot of insight into the sales data at this company. Now she would love to see mawr results by John, and to do that, all she has to do is to click on his name now all of the search results are only those that have been authored by John. In fact, this whole panel at the top of the results allow her to filter her search results or sort them in different ways. By clicking on these authors filter, she can discover other authors who are reputed for the topic that she's searching for. She can also filter by tags, and she can sort these results in different ways. This whole experience off doing a search and then filtering search results easily is similar to how we use e commerce search engines in the consumer world. For example, Amazon, where you may search for a product and then filter by price range or filter by brand. For example, Let's also spend a minute talking about how do we determine relevance for these results and how they're ranked. Um, when considering relevance for these results, we consider three main categories of things. We want to first make sure that the result is in fact relevant to the question that the user is asking, and for that we look at various fields within the result. We look at the title, the author, the description, but also the technical query underpinning that result. We also want to make sure that the results are trustworthy, because we want users to be able to make business decisions based on the results that they find. And for that we look at a number of signals as well. For example, how popular that result is is one of those signals. And finally, we want to make sure the results are relevant to the users themselves. So we look at signals to personalize the result for that user. So those are all the different categories of signals that we used to determine overall ranking for a search result. You may be wondering what happens if if Charlotte asks a question for which nobody has created any answer, so no answers exist. Let's say she wants to know what the total sales of genes for last year and no one's created that well. It's really easy for her to switch from searching for answers, which is searching for content that has already been created to searching the data directly so she can create a new insight from scratch. Let's see how that works. She could just click here, and now she's in the search data in her face and for the question that I just talked about. She can just type genes sales last year. And just like that, she could get an answer to her question. The total sales for jeans last year were almost $4.6 million. As you can see, the two modes off search searching for answers and searching, the data are complementary, and it's really easy to switch from one to the other. Now we understand that some business users may not be motivated to create their own insights from scratch. Or sometimes some of these business users may have questions that are too complicated, and so they may struggle to create their own inside from scratch. Now what happens usually in these circumstances is that these users will open a ticket, which would go to the analyst team. The analyst team is usually overrun with these tickets and have trouble prioritizing them. And so we started thinking, How can we make that entire feedback loop really efficient so that analysts can have a massive impact with as little work as possible? Let me show you what we came up with. Search answers comes with this system generated dashboard that analysts can see to see analytics on the queries that business users are asking in search answers so it contains high level K P. I is like, You know how many searches there are and how many users there are. It also contains one of the most popular queries that users are asking. But most importantly, it contains information about what are popular queries where users are failing. So the number on the top right tells you that about 10% off queries in this case ended with no results. So the user clearly failed because there were no results on the table. Right below it shows you here are the top search queries for original results exist. So, for example, the highlighted row there says jean sales with the number three, which tells the analysts that last week there were three searches for the query jean sales and the resulted in no results on search answers. Now, when an analyst sees a report like this, they can use it to prioritize what kind of content they could be creating or optimizing. Now, in addition to giving them inside into queries which led to no results or zero results. This dashboard also contains reports on creatives that lead to poor results because the user did get some results but didn't click on anything, meaning that they didn't get the answer that they were looking for. Taking all these insights, analysts can better prioritize and either create or optimize their content to have maximum impact for their business users with the least amount of for. So that was the demo. As you can see with search answers, we've created a very consumer search interface that any business user can use to get the answers to their questions by leveraging data or answers that have already been created in the system by other users in their organization. In addition, we're creating tools that allow analysts toe create or optimized content that can have the highest impact for these business users. All right, so that was the demo or thoughts about one and hope you guys liked it. We're really excited about it. Now Let me just spend a minute talking about what's coming next. As I've mentioned before, we want to connect every business user with the insights that are most relevant for them, and for that we will continue to invest in Advanced AI and personalization, and some of the ways you will see it is improved relevance in ranking in recommendations in how we understand your questions across the product within search within the home page everywhere. The second team that will continue to invest in is powerful analyst tools. We talked about tools and, I assure you, tools that make the analysts more self service. We are committed to improving the analyst experience so that they can make the most off their time. An example of a tool that we're really excited about is one that allows them to bridge the vocabulary difference that this even business user asks questions. A user asked a question like revenue, but the column name for the metric in the data set its sales. Now analysts can get insights into what are the words that users air using in their questions that aren't matching anything in the data set and easily create synonyms so that that vocabulary difference gets breached. But that's just one example of how we're thinking about empowering the analysts so that with minimal work, they can amplify their impact and help their business users succeed. So there's a lot coming, and we're really excited about how we're planning to evolve thoughts about one. With all that said, Um, there's just, well, one more thing that my friend Bob wants to talk to you guys about. So back to you, Bob. >>Thanks, Michelle. It's such a great demo and so fun to see all the new work that's going on with thought. Spot one. All the happenings for the new features coming out that will be under the hood. But of course, on the design side, we're going to continue to evolve the front end as well, and this is what we're hoping to move towards. So here you'll see a new log in screen and then the new homepage. So compared to the material that you saw just a few minutes ago, you'll notice this look is much lighter. A little bit nicer use of color up in the top bar with search the features over here to allow you to switch between searching against answers at versus creating new answers, the settings and user profile controls down here and then on the search results page itself also lighter look and feel again. Mork color up in the search bar up the top. A little bit nicer treatments here. We'll continue to evolve the look and feel the product in coming months and quarters and look forward to continue to constantly improving thoughts about one Hannah back to you. >>Thanks, Bob, and thank you both for showing us the next generation of thought spot. I'd love to go a bit deeper on some of the points you touched on there. I've got a couple of questions here. Bob, how do you think about designing for consumer experience versus designing for enterprise solutions? >>Yes, I mentioned Hannah. We don't >>really try to distinguish so much between enterprise users and consumer users. It's really kind of two different context of use. But we still always think that users want some product and feature and experience that's easy to use and makes sense to them. So instead of trying to think about those is two completely different design processes I think about it may be the way Frank Lloyd Wright would approached architecture. >>Er I >>mean, in his career, he fluidly moved between residential architecture like falling water and the Robie House. But he also designed marquis buildings like the Johnson wax building. In each case, he simply looked at the requirements, thought about what was necessary for those users and designed accordingly. And that's really what we do. A thought spot. We spend time talking to customers. We spend time talking to users, and we spent a lot of time thinking through the problem and trying to solve it holistically. And it's simply a possible >>thanks, Bob. That's a beautiful analogy on one last question for you. Bischel. How frequently will you be adding features to this new experience, >>But I'm glad you asked that, Hannah, because this is something that we are really really excited about with thoughts about one being in the cloud. We want to go really, really fast. So we expect to eventually get to releasing new innovations every day. We expect that in the near future, we'll get to, you know, every month and every week, and we hope to get to everyday eventually fingers crossed on housing. That can happen. Great. Thanks, >>Michelle. And thank you, Bob. I'm so glad you could all join us this morning to hear more about thoughts about one. Stay close and get ready for the next session. which will be beginning in a few minutes. In it will be introduced to thoughts for >>everywhere are >>embedded analytics product on. We'll be hearing directly from our customers at Hayes about how they're using embedded analytics to help healthcare providers across billing compliance on revenue integrity functions. To make more informed decisions on make effective actions to avoid risk and maximize revenue. See you there.

Published Date : Dec 10 2020

SUMMARY :

I'm delighted to have you here today. It's great to be here with everybody today and really excited to be able to present to you thought spot one. And she can see that Midwest is still the region with the highest sales for jeans, So compared to the material that you saw just a few minutes ago, you'll notice this look is much lighter. I'd love to go a bit deeper on some of the points you touched on there. We don't that's easy to use and makes sense to them. In each case, he simply looked at the requirements, thought about what was necessary for those users and designed How frequently will you be adding features to this new experience, We expect that in the near future, and get ready for the next session. actions to avoid risk and maximize revenue.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

BobPERSON

0.99+

SureshPERSON

0.99+

MichellePERSON

0.99+

HannahPERSON

0.99+

Rachel ThioPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Frank Lloyd WrightPERSON

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

$1.35 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

CharlottePERSON

0.99+

Bob BaxleyPERSON

0.99+

AndyPERSON

0.99+

WhatsAppORGANIZATION

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

thirdQUANTITY

0.99+

BischelPERSON

0.99+

Hannah SindenPERSON

0.99+

second sectionQUANTITY

0.99+

about $4.24 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

each caseQUANTITY

0.99+

less than 30 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

second pieceQUANTITY

0.99+

HotspotORGANIZATION

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

over $23 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

first resultQUANTITY

0.99+

zeroQUANTITY

0.98+

two modesQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

three main categoriesQUANTITY

0.98+

three searchesQUANTITY

0.98+

second teamQUANTITY

0.98+

iTunesTITLE

0.98+

HayesORGANIZATION

0.98+

three main sectionsQUANTITY

0.98+

one key pieceQUANTITY

0.97+

one last questionQUANTITY

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

both thoughtsQUANTITY

0.97+

three metricsQUANTITY

0.97+

zero resultsQUANTITY

0.96+

about 10%QUANTITY

0.96+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

three peopleQUANTITY

0.96+

one exampleQUANTITY

0.95+

almost $4.6 millionQUANTITY

0.94+

twoQUANTITY

0.92+

one more thingQUANTITY

0.9+

Answer ExplorerTITLE

0.88+

OmiyaPERSON

0.87+

MidwestLOCATION

0.87+

few minutes agoDATE

0.86+

X axisORGANIZATION

0.85+

From Zero to Search | Beyond.2020 Digital


 

>>Yeah, >>yeah. Hello and welcome to Day two at Beyond. I am so excited that you've chosen to join the building a vibrant data ecosystem track. I might be just a little bit biased, but I think it's going to be the best track of the day. My name is Mallory Lassen and I run partner Marketing here, a thought spot, and that might give you a little bit of a clue as to why I'm so excited about the four sessions we're about to hear from. We'll start off hearing from two thought spotters on how the power of embrace can allow you to directly query on the cloud data warehouse of your choice Next up. And I shouldn't choose favorites, but I'm very excited to watch Cindy housing moderate a panel off true industry experts. We'll hear from Deloitte Snowflake and Eagle Alfa as they describe how you can enrich your organization's data and better understand and benchmark by using third party data. They may even close off with a prediction or two about the future that could prove to be pretty thought provoking. So I'd stick around for that. Next we'll hear from the cloud juggernaut themselves AWS. We'll even get to see a live demo using TV show data, which I'm pretty sure is near and dear to our hearts. At this point in time and then last, I'm very excited to welcome our customer from T Mobile. They're going to describe how they partnered with whip pro and developed a full solution, really modernizing their analytics and giving self service to so many employees. We'll see what that's done for them. But first, let's go over to James Bell Z and Ana Son on the zero to search session. James, take us away. >>Thanks, Mallory. I'm James Bell C and I look after the solutions engineering and customer success teams have thought spot here in Asia Pacific and Japan today I'm joined by my colleague Anderson to give you a look at just how simple and quick it is to connect thought spot to your cloud data warehouse and extract value from the data within in the demonstration, and I will show you just how we can connect to data, make it simple for the business to search and then search the data itself or within this short session. And I want to point out that everything you're going to see in the demo is Run Live against the Cloud Data Warehouse. In this case, we're using snowflake, and there's no cashing of data or summary tables in terms of what you're going to see. But >>before we >>jump into the demo itself, I just like to provide a very brief overview of the value proposition for thought spot. If you're already familiar with thought spot, this will come as no surprise. But for those new to the platform, it's all about empowering the business to answer their own questions about data in the most simple way possible Through search, the personalized user experience provides a familiar search based way for anyone to get answers to their questions about data, not just the analysts. The search, indexing and ranking makes it easy to find the data you're looking for using business terms that you understand. While the smart ranking constantly adjust the index to ensure the most relevant information is provided to you. The query engine removes the complexity of SQL and complex joint paths while ensuring that users will always get thio the correct answers their questions. This is all backed up by an architecture that's designed to be consumed entirely through a browser with flexibility on deployment methods. You can run thought spot through our thoughts about cloud offering in your own cloud or on premise. The choice is yours, so I'm sure you're thinking that all sounds great. But how difficult is it to get this working? Well, I'm happy to tell you it's super easy. There's just forced steps to unlock the value of your data stored in snowflake, Red Shift, Google, Big Query or any of the other cloud data warehouses that we support. It's a simple is connecting to the Cloud Data Warehouse, choosing what data you want to make available in thought spot, making it user friendly. That column that's called cussed underscore name in the database is great for data management, but when users they're searching for it, they'll probably want to use customer or customer name or account or even client. Also, the business shouldn't need to know that they need to get data from multiple tables or the joint parts needed to get the correct results in thought spot. The worksheet allows you to make all of this simple for the users so they can simply concentrate on getting answers to their questions on Once the worksheet is ready, you can start asking those questions by now. I'm sure you're itching to see this in action. So without further ado, I'm gonna hand over to Anna to show you exactly how this works over to you. Anna, >>In this demo, I'm going to go to cover three areas. First, we'll start with how simple it is to get answers to your questions in class spot. Then we'll have a look at how to create a new connection to Cloud Data Warehouse. And lastly, how to create a use of friendly data layer. Let's get started to get started. I'm going to show you the ease off search with thoughts Spot. As you can see thought spot is or were based. I'm simply lobbying. Divide a browser. This means you don't need to install an application. Additionally, possible does not require you to move any data. So all your data stays in your cloud data warehouse and doesn't need to be moved around. Those sports called differentiator is used experience, and that is primarily search. As soon as we come into the search bar here, that's what suggestion is guiding uses through to the answers? Let's let's say that I would wanna have a look at spending across the different product categories, and we want Thio. Look at that for the last 12 months, and we also want to focus on a trending on monthly. And just like that, we get our answer straightaway without alive from Snowflake. Now let's say we want to focus on 11 product category here. We want to have a look at the performance for finished goods. As I started partially typing my search them here, Thoughts was already suggesting the data value that's available for me to use as a filter. The indexing behind the scene actually index everything about the data which allowed me to get to my data easily and quickly as an end user. Now I've got my next to my data answer here. I can also go to the next level of detail in here. In third spot to navigate on the next level of detail is simply one click away. There's no concept off drill path, pre defined drill path in here. That means we've ordered data that's available to me from Snowflake. I'm able to navigate to the level of detail. Allow me to answer those questions. As you can see as a business user, I don't need to do any coding. There's no dragon drop to get to the answer that I need right here. And she can see other calculations are done on the fly. There is no summary tables, no cubes building are simply able to ask the questions. Follow my train or thoughts, and this provides a better use experience for users as anybody can search in here, the more we interact with the spot, the more it learns about my search patterns and make those suggestions based on the ranking in here and that a returns on the fly from Snowflake. Now you've seen example of a search. Let's go ahead and have a look at How do we create a connection? Brand new one toe a cloud at a warehouse. Here we are here, let me add a new connection to the data were healthy by just clicking at new connection. Today we're going to connect Thio retail apparel data step. So let's start with the name. As you can see, we can easily connect to all the popular data warehouse easily. By just one single click here today, we're going to click to Snowflake. I'm gonna ask some detail he'd let me connect to my account here. Then we quickly enter those details here, and this would determine what data is available to me. I can go ahead and specify database to connect to as well, but I want to connect to all the tables and view. So let's go ahead and create a connection. Now the two systems are talking to each other. I can see all the data that's available available for me to connect to. Let's go ahead and connect to the starter apparel data source here and expanding that I can see all the data tables as available to me. I could go ahead and click on any table here, so there's affect herbal containing all the cells information. I also have the store and product information here I can make. I can choose any Data column that I want to include in my search. Available in soft spot, what can go ahead and select entire table, including all the data columns. I will. I would like to point out that this is important because if any given table that you have contains hundreds of columns it it may not be necessary for you to bring across all of those data columns, so thoughts would allow you to select what's relevant for your analysis. Now that's selected all the tables. Let's go ahead and create a connection. Now force what confirms the data columns that we have selected and start to read the medic metadata from Snowflake and automatically building that search index behind the scene. Now, if your daughter does contain information such as personal, identifiable information, then you can choose to turn those investing off. So none of that would be, um, on a hot spots platform. Now that my tables are ready here, I can actually go ahead and search straight away. Let's go ahead and have a look at the table here. I'm going to click on the fact table heat on the left hand side. It shows all the data column that we've brought across from Snowflake as well as the metadata that also brought over here as well. A preview off the data shows me off the data that's available on my snowflake platform. Let's take a look at the joints tap here. The joint step shows may relationship that has already been defined the foreign and primary care redefining snowflake, and we simply inherited he in fourth spot. However, you don't have toe define all of this relationship in snowflake to add a joint. He is also simple and easy. If I click on at a joint here, I simply select the table that I wanted to create a connection for. So select the fact table on the left, then select the product table onto the right here and then simply selected Data column would wish to join those two tables on Let's select Product ID and clicking next, and that's always required to create a joint between those two tables. But since we already have those strong relationship brought over from Snow Flag, I won't go ahead and do that Now. Now you have seen how the tables have brought over Let's go and have a look at how easy is to search coming to search here. Let's start with selecting the data table would brought over expanding the tables. You can see all the data column that we have previously seen from snowflake that. Let's say I wanna have a look at sales in last year. Let's start to type. And even before I start to type anything in the search bar passport already showing me all those suggestions, guiding me to the answers that's relevant to my need. Let's start with having a look at sales for 2019. And I want to see this across monthly for my trend and out off all of these product line he. I also want to focus on a product line called Jackets as I started partially typing the product line jacket for sport, already proactively recommending me all the matches that it has. So all the data values available for me to search as a filter here, let's go ahead and select jacket. And just like that, I get my answer straight away from Snowflake. Now that's relatively simple. Let's try something a little bit more complex. Let's say I wanna have a look at sales comparing across different regions, um, in us. So I want compare West compared to Southwest, and then I want to combat it against Midwest as well as against based on still and also want to see these trending monthly as well. Let's have look at monthly. If you can see that I can use terms such as monthly Key would like that to look at different times. Buckets. Now all of these is out of the box. As she can see, I didn't have to do any indexing. I didn't have to do any formulas in here. As long as there is a date column in the data set, crossbows able to dynamically calculate those time bucket so she can see. Just by doing that search, I was able to create dynamic groupings segment of different sales across the United States on the sales data here. Now that we've done doing search, you can see that across different tables here might not be the most user friendly layer we don't want uses having to individually select tables. And then, um, you know, selecting different columns with cryptic names in here. We want to make this easy for users, and that's when a work ship comes in. But those were were sheet encapsulate all of the data you want to make available for search as well as formulas, as well as business terminologies that the users are familiar with for a specific business area. Let's start with adding the daughter columns we need for this work shape. Want to slack all of the tables that we just brought across from Snowflake? Expanding each of those tables from the facts type of want sales from the fax table. We want sales as well as the date. Then on the store's table. We want store name as well as the stay eating, then expanding to the product we want name and finally product type. Now that we've got our work shit ready, let's go ahead and save it Now, in order to provide best experience for users to search, would want to optimize the work sheet here. So coming to the worksheet here, you can see the data column that we have selected. Let's start with changing this name to be more user friendly, so let's call it fails record. They will want to call it just simply date, store name, call it store, and then we also want state to be in lower case product name. Simply call it product and finally, product type can also further optimize this worksheet by adding, uh, other areas such as synonyms, so allow users to use terms of familiar with to do that search. So in sales, let's call this revenue and we all cannot also further configure the geo configuration. So want to identify state in here as state for us. And finally, we want Thio. Also add more friendly on a display on a currency. So let's change the currency type. I want to show it in U. S. Dollars. That's all we need. So let's try to change and let's get started on our search now coming back to the search here, Let's go ahead. Now select out worksheet that we have just created. If I don't select any specific tables or worksheets, force what Simply a search across everything that's available to you. Expanding the worksheet. We can see all of the data columns in heat that's we've made available and clicking on search bar for spot already. Reckon, making those recommendations in here to start off? Let's have a look at I wanna have a look at the revenue across different states for here today, so let's use the synonym that we have defined across the different states and we want to see this for here today. Um yesterday as well. I know that I also want to focus on the product line jacket that we have seen before, so let's go ahead and select jacket. Yeah, and just like that, I was able to get the answer straight away in third spot. Let's also share some data label here so we can see exactly the Mount as well to state that police performance across us in here. Now I've got information about the sales of jackets on the state. I want to ask next level question. I want to draw down to the store that has been selling these jackets right Click e. I want to drill down. As you can see out of the box. I didn't have to pre define any drill paths on a target. Reports simply allow me to navigate to the next level of detail to answer my own questions. One Click away. Now I see the same those for the jackets by store from year to date, and this is directly from snowflake data life Not gonna start relatively simple question. Let's go ahead and ask a question that's a little bit more complex. Imagine one. Have a look at Silas this year, and I want to see that by month, month over month or so. I want to see a month. Yeah, and I also want to see that our focus on a sale on the last week off the month. So that's where we see most. Sales comes in the last week off the month, so I want to focus on that as well. Let's focus on last week off each month. And on top of that, I also want to only focus on the top performing stores from last year. So I want to focus on the top five stores from last year, so only store in top five in sales store and for last year. And with that, we also want to focus just on the populist product types as well. So product type. Now, this could be very reasonable question that a business user would like to ask. But behind the scenes, this could be quite complex. But First part takes cares, or the complexity off the data allow the user to focus on the answer they want to get to. If we quickly have a look at the query here, this shows how forceful translate the search that were put in there into queries into that, we can pass on the snowflake. As you can see, the search uses all three tables as well shooting, utilizing the joints and the metadata layer that we have created. Switching over to the sequel here, this sequel actually generate on the fly pass on the snowflake in order for the snowflake to bring back to result and presented in the first spot. I also want to mention that in the latest release Off Hot Spot, we also bringing Embraced um, in the latest version, Off tosspot 6.3 story Q is also coming to embrace. That means one click or two analysis. Those who are in power users to monitor key metrics on kind of anomalies, identify leading indicators and isolate trends, as you can see in a matter of minutes. Using thought spot, we were able to connect to most popular on premise or on cloud data warehouses. We were able to get blazing fast answers to our searches, allow us to transform raw data to incite in the speed off thoughts. Ah, pass it back to you, James. >>Thanks, Anna. Wow, that was awesome. It's incredible to see how much committee achieved in such a short amount of time. I want to close this session by referring to a customer example of who, For those of you in the US, I'm sure you're familiar with who, Lou. But for our international audience, who Lou our immediate streaming service similar to a Netflix or Disney Plus, As you can imagine, the amount of data created by a service like this is massive, with over 32 million subscribers and who were asking questions of over 16 terabytes of data in snow folk. Using regular B I tools on top of this size of data would usually mean using summary or aggregate level data, but with thoughts. What? Who are able to get granular insights into the data, allowing them to understand what they're subscribes of, watching how their campaigns of performing and how their programming is being received, and take advantage of that data to reduce churn and increase revenue. So thank you for your time today. Through the session, you've seen just how simple it is to get thought spot up and running on your cloud data warehouse toe. Unlock the value of your data and minutes. If you're interested in trying this on your own data, you can sign up for a free 14 day trial of thoughts. What cloud? Right now? Thanks again, toe Anna for such awards and demo. And if you have any questions, please feel free to let us know. >>Awesome. Thank you, James and Anna. That was incredible. To see it in action and how it all came together on James. We do actually have a couple of questions in our last few minutes here, Anna. >>The first one will be >>for you. Please. This will be a two part question. One. What Cloud Data Warehouses does embrace support today. And to can we use embrace to connect to multiple data warehouses. Thank you, Mallory. Today embrace supports. Snowflake Google, Big query. Um, Red shift as you assign that Teradata advantage and essay Bahana with more sources to come in the future. And, yes, you can connect on live query from notable data warehouses. Most of our enterprise customers have gotta spread across several data warehouses like just transactional data and red Shift and South will start. It's not like, excellent on James will have the final question go to you, You please. Are there any size restrictions for how much data thought spot can handle? And does one need to optimize their database for performance, for example? Aggregations. >>Yeah, that's a great question. So, you know, as we've just heard from our customer, who there's, there's really no limits in terms of the amount of data that you can bring into thoughts Ponant connect to. We have many customers that have, in excess of 10 terabytes of data that they're connecting to in those cloud data warehouses. And, yeah, there's there's no need to pre aggregate or anything. Thought Spot works best with that transactional level data being able to get right down into the details behind it and surface those answers to the business uses. >>Excellent. Well, thank you both so much. And for everyone at home watching thank you for joining us for that session. You have a few minutes toe. Get up, get some water, get a bite of food. What? You won't want to miss this next panel in it. We have our chief data strategy off Officer Cindy, Housing speaking toe experts in the field from Deloitte Snowflake and Eagle Alfa. All on best practices for leveraging external data sources. See you there

Published Date : Dec 10 2020

SUMMARY :

I might be just a little bit biased, but I think it's going to be the best track of the day. to give you a look at just how simple and quick it is to connect thought spot to your cloud data warehouse and extract adjust the index to ensure the most relevant information is provided to you. source here and expanding that I can see all the data tables as available to me. Who are able to get granular insights into the data, We do actually have a couple of questions in our last few sources to come in the future. of data that they're connecting to in those cloud data warehouses. And for everyone at home watching thank you for joining

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JamesPERSON

0.99+

AnnaPERSON

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

two tablesQUANTITY

0.99+

T MobileORGANIZATION

0.99+

Asia PacificLOCATION

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

14 dayQUANTITY

0.99+

MalloryPERSON

0.99+

two systemsQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

JapanLOCATION

0.99+

Ana SonPERSON

0.99+

Deloitte SnowflakeORGANIZATION

0.99+

Eagle AlfaORGANIZATION

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

Mallory LassenPERSON

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

U. S.LOCATION

0.99+

AndersonPERSON

0.99+

four sessionsQUANTITY

0.99+

first spotQUANTITY

0.99+

each monthQUANTITY

0.99+

SQLTITLE

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

one clickQUANTITY

0.99+

Eagle AlfaORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

Day twoQUANTITY

0.98+

First partQUANTITY

0.98+

10 terabytesQUANTITY

0.98+

11 productQUANTITY

0.98+

over 32 million subscribersQUANTITY

0.98+

over 16 terabytesQUANTITY

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

CindyPERSON

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.98+

third spotQUANTITY

0.97+

eachQUANTITY

0.97+

Disney PlusORGANIZATION

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.96+

fourth spotQUANTITY

0.96+

first oneQUANTITY

0.96+

TeradataORGANIZATION

0.95+

One ClickQUANTITY

0.94+

two analysisQUANTITY

0.92+

five storesQUANTITY

0.91+

Off tosspotTITLE

0.9+

Off Hot SpotTITLE

0.89+

BeyondORGANIZATION

0.89+

ThioORGANIZATION

0.89+

one singleQUANTITY

0.89+

LouPERSON

0.88+

two part questionQUANTITY

0.87+

two thought spottersQUANTITY

0.87+

SilasORGANIZATION

0.87+

6.3QUANTITY

0.86+

three tablesQUANTITY

0.85+

last 12 monthsDATE

0.85+

James Bell CPERSON

0.8+

SnowflakeTITLE

0.79+

fiveQUANTITY

0.77+

MidwestLOCATION

0.75+

threeQUANTITY

0.75+

hundreds of columnsQUANTITY

0.75+

Jim Ryan & Marie Godfrey, Flexera | AWS re:Invent 2020


 

>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of AWS re:Invent 2020, sponsored by Intel, AWS and our community partners. >> You're watching continued coverage of AWS re:Invent 2020. I'm sure you're joining just a couple of hundred thousand of your closest friends and family on the web as we engage this AWS builder community in a very different way this year. I'm super excited to have one, for the first time Flexera on theCUBE program, I'm Keith Townsend @CTOAdvisor on Twitter and I'm joined by the CEO of Flexera, Jim Ryan. Jim, welcome to the show. >> Thanks for having us Keith. >> And Marie Godfrey, Senior Vice President of Product at Flexera. >> Thanks. It's good to be here. >> Welcome to the show. So, first off, I think most of the industry knows Flexera from the famous survey you guys do every year. Help us understand, what's the purpose of the survey and the intent of it? >> I think the purpose of the survey is to continue to provide the pulse of the market to our customers and the market at large. This is not a revelation to say that cloud, hybrid cloud, multi-cloud is an ever-changing fast, fast moving target in the industry and we find that by pulsing our customers and pulsing the market and then in return, giving people a broader sense as to what's going on, how they view the current top three challenges that they're facing, allows people to just stay relevant and stay current without having to do so much heavy lifting themselves. >> So, talk to me about the other part that's not as famous. Marie, the product, what's the primary goal of Flexera? >> So, to take off from what Jim said, the state of the cloud report that we issue every year is just one of many that we do research on and we published and Flexera hasn't always been known as a cloud management tool or a cloud provider of optimization solutions for the cloud. We have grown up and our legacy is very much on software asset management. So, over the course of both organic and inorganic means, we find ourselves in this great position now to be able to talk to not only our core strengths as an organization and as a company, but also what we do to help our customers optimize their cloud cost. >> So, one of the interesting outputs or data points from the report is this 70/30 split. I've seen it as 80/20, 70/30, more or less the same ideal concept that we spend 30% of our time basically on these innovative projects but 70% of our time basically on traditional IT operations. How does that impact your team's view of the market? >> Well, I think it profoundly impacts our view. You can call it the elephant in the room or you can call it the immovable object. The fact of the matter remains is that although a lot of the focus, attention and an ever increasing share of everybody's budget is being focused and centered on the cloud, if you're a CIO or somebody working in the CIO's organization, what you've got to realize and focus on is that 70% of your applications in your spending in your tech stack, are still on premise and VMs and other things that simply cannot be ignored. So, our overarching value proposition above and beyond remaining relevant in the cloud and publishing the state of the cloud is we focus on giving CIOs and IT teams the insight as to what's going on in your on-prem estate and if we do our jobs properly with our technology stack, it's identifying overuse or cost optimization opportunities, so, you can take dollars from your legacy stack and throw it over to invest in more innovative things that's going to move the needle for your business. >> So, that's a pretty interesting, I think value pop especially where the public cloud show help me understand kind of the overall challenge when we're thinking about public cloud, where typically less than 30% of our resources are probably in the public cloud. For most people watching this interview and the majority are on the private cloud, how does like Flexera help me to extract the value of both environments? >> Well, that's by robbing Peter to pay Paul, right? So, for everybody listening in here, lean in and listen. The biggest problem that we have when we're talking with our customers is that the cloud people aren't talking to the legacy on-prem asset management people and like Americans or everybody else, we got to just get together and talk to one another so, there's money and budget dollars to be extracted on the legacy on-prem last glamorous stuff of the house here and I say with great certainty not knowing all of the situations with everybody that's watching this, that I'm sure that you fight for single Dollar, Euro, Pound, Yen, et cetera, et cetera that you want to spend on your cloud initiatives. By collaborating with your brethren and your sisters over on the other side of the aisle and by looking at what's going on on the on-prem estate here, you can identify opportunities where you can reallocate budget dollars. >> So Marie, you guys have this term that I've not seen before, Technology Value Optimization or TVO, explain that to me. >> So, TVO is just the latest evolution in terms of how we think about our portfolio and our place in this ecosystem. That includes not just your traditional infrastructure management but this bridging and this realization of value when it comes to how we help our customers extract the value from what we do really, really well which is all around discovery of IT assets. It's around knowing my entitlements, it's around understanding my usage and now of course we brought cloud assets into the picture and helping our customers not only understand and see into those cloud assets but really look at how do I right size? How do I reclaim dollars? How do I avoid failed audits and really understand my usage patterns and what it is I need to do to enact and move toward that digital transformation that Jim referred to? So, at the end of the day, how we think about technology value optimization is that critical factor which is all around understanding the return on the investment and how to better understand and monetize the value for our customers in terms of what they have today and where they need to go. >> Ken, I wanted you to shed some light in what we consider or what we should now consider assets in this new era of cloud, and that your traditional products that how could others understand the AS or the asset either is a server or a virtual machine on that server networks switch etcetera but as I look at SaaS and past platforms and infrastructure as a service platform, what is the asset in this new world? >> By my definition, an asset is anything that your company spend money on and you need to get a return on it. So, 10 years ago, if we were having this conversation, an asset would have been a desktop, a router, a server, or maybe it would be a multi-core server and as things started to get a little bit more complicated, we added virtual machines. So, assets weren't just physical devices, they were virtual devices where we really cut our teeth and made a name for ourselves at Flexera was in software license optimization or software asset management, which is you take all of your physical assets and then you throw software applications from IBM, Oracle SAP, Microsoft and you put those two together and what you have are licensable events or financial exposure, because it's not just as simple as buying a database from Oracle, Oracle is going to want to know how many cores you're running on the server, and all of those different combinations in a Rubik's cube of complexity throw off licensable or financial events and while I'd love to tell everybody that the cloud and hybrid cloud and multi-cloud is making it easier, it's actually making it more sophisticated and more complicated to try and get your head around it because now you have containers and just when we thought we had figured out VMs and what assets and things are running in VMs, you've got containers that are going up and down and trying to find out what assets are in containers across a hybrid multicloud environment says the latest instantiation of chasing your tail here in the business. >> And then help me think through, or at least visualize this concept of entitlements when it comes to the cloud era. When I had on premises assets, I could go and look at my Oracle license and maybe figure out what I was entitled to but now when I, especially when I think of multicloud multi-service and even hybrid where Microsoft gives me credits or on premises services versus off-prem services, help me understand how I should be looking at that and how Flexera helps. >> I think you've got to be looking at it at closely and you can't look at it in isolation. So what you can't do is look at what you've got spun up in an Azure environment and AWS or Google cloud environment, because you're only going to negotiate one agreement with Microsoft most likely. You're only going to negotiate one ELA with IBM or Oracle, or fill in the blank and you know what, Oracle's not going to care what you're running in just cloud if they come and audit you. They are going to perform an audit, and they're going to want to know what you're running in in an on-prem world in VMs, on your data center and your desktop, and then they're going to want you to bring to full account what you're running in your cloud environments as well. So the way Flexera helps you is that we can discover, and we can give you an unprecedented visibility into what's running throughout your IT assets estate, whether it's on-prem, on a desktop, in a data center, on a SaaS application and an infrastructure platform as a service, pull it back and normalize it and compare that to what you've actually signed with all of your suppliers and when we do our job right, our customers run our algorithms across what you're entitled to use and what you're actually using, and what we find is that there's anywhere from 30 zero to 30% of overused in spend in ways. >> Keith, I just want to add example of where I saw this in real time with one of our solution engineers this about two weeks ago, where he was demonstrating the power of what we deliver across entitlements and usage and understanding where a potential wasted spend is and the customer was really focused on Oracle, and making sure that the Oracle negotiation coming up was going to be one where the customer felt like they were in a position of strengths and really understood what entitlements and usage were but when we showed them that Oracle was one piece of a bigger puzzle and that their cloud spend and AWS spend, and even their spend with some of their largest SaaS applications was actually much smaller than the whole, it really showed the customer the power of looking at these assets back to your question around assets and how do we think about them in a way that compares them to one another so the customer gets a full point of view. >> It's very difficult to get an Apple's and Apple's comparison with hybrid versus public and it's no longer just, I don't know if it was ever simple, but it's just more complex these days. Last question, as you look at the past few years, and I go to the Flexera website and look at your product portfolio, talk to me about the relationship between your customer in the industry and how that's changed and how customers consume Flexera as a product. >> I think over the years, our customers like the market has shifted to our SaaS and cloud offering we back in the day we used to have perpetual licenses and we were focusing on an on-prem scenario only, and our customers rightfully so have become far more demanding much like the market has and they now expect things to be delivered in real time with an agile mindset on a SaaS or cloud native basis and with that becomes a much, much higher expectation in terms of customer success and service that they get, because they're on a subscription basis, they can cancel at any time, just like we can do with our cable service provider. So we've really had to invest a lot, not just in R&D and making sure that our technology delivers outcomes, but in the way that we work with and service our customers. They're far more demanding than that they ever have and I wouldn't want it any other way and we think that our strategic imperatives is just keeping up with that in their high demands and expectations in the future. >> Well, I really appreciate you two taking out the time out of your busy schedules, both of you on the East coast, I'm in a Midwest, couple of hundred thousand people tuning into AWS re:Invent 2020 virtual learning to tackle a lot of these complex problems. The pandemic, the new reality of the market has forced us to address implementing and managing enterprise IT in a completely different way. This conference is a great example of that. We thank our friends at Flexera for sponsoring this interview. You want to learn more about theCUBE's coverage? Subscribe to the YouTube channel. Plenty of content with me and my fellow co-host this year coming out of AWS re:Invent 2020 talk to you next installment of theCUBE. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Dec 8 2020

SUMMARY :

and our community partners. and family on the web of Product at Flexera. It's good to be here. and the intent of it? and pulsing the market and then in return, Marie, the product, what's of optimization solutions for the cloud. 70/30, more or less the same and publishing the state of the cloud and the majority are on the private cloud, is that the cloud people or TVO, explain that to me. and monetize the value and as things started to get and how Flexera helps. and compare that to what and making sure that the and I go to the Flexera website and expectations in the future. of the market has forced us

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Marie GodfreyPERSON

0.99+

JimPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

MariePERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

PaulPERSON

0.99+

KenPERSON

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

KeithPERSON

0.99+

Jim RyanPERSON

0.99+

30QUANTITY

0.99+

Keith TownsendPERSON

0.99+

PeterPERSON

0.99+

FlexeraORGANIZATION

0.99+

less than 30%QUANTITY

0.99+

TVOORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

both environmentsQUANTITY

0.98+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.98+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.97+

one agreementQUANTITY

0.96+

10 years agoDATE

0.96+

first timeQUANTITY

0.95+

this yearDATE

0.95+

oneQUANTITY

0.94+

todayDATE

0.94+

pandemicEVENT

0.93+

AmericansPERSON

0.92+

one pieceQUANTITY

0.9+

Oracle SAPORGANIZATION

0.89+

70/30DATE

0.88+

re:Invent 2020EVENT

0.87+

AzureTITLE

0.86+

hundred thousand peopleQUANTITY

0.86+

theCUBETITLE

0.84+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.84+

two weeks agoDATE

0.82+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.81+

firstQUANTITY

0.81+

EuroOTHER

0.8+

FlexeraTITLE

0.78+

YenOTHER

0.75+

2020TITLE

0.75+

re:Invent 2020TITLE

0.72+

three challengesQUANTITY

0.71+

topQUANTITY

0.7+

single DollarQUANTITY

0.68+

past few yearsDATE

0.68+

CEOPERSON

0.66+

Invent 2020TITLE

0.66+

Technology Value OptimizationTITLE

0.64+

couple of hundred thousandQUANTITY

0.64+

coupleQUANTITY

0.63+

AWSTITLE

0.62+

Steven Lueck, Associated Bank | IBM DataOps in Action


 

from the cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world this is a cube conversation hi Bri welcome back this is Dave Volante and welcome to this special presentation made possible by IBM we're talking about data op data ops in Acton Steve Lucas here he's the senior vice president and director of data management at Associated Bank be great to see how are things going and in Wisconsin all safe we're doing well we're staying safe staying healthy thanks for having me Dave yeah you're very welcome so Associated Bank and regional bank Midwest to cover a lot of the territories not just Wisconsin but another number of other states around there retail commercial lending real estate offices stuff I think the largest bank in in Wisconsin but tell us a little bit about your business in your specific role sure yeah no it's a good intro we're definitely largest bank at Corvis concen and then we have branches in the in the Upper Midwest area so Minnesota Illinois Wisconsin our primary locations my role at associated I'm director data management so been with the bank a couple of years now and really just focused on defining our data strategy as an overall everything from data ingestion through consumption of data and analytics all the way through and then I'm also the data governance components and keeping the controls and the rails in place around all of our data in its usage so financial services obviously one of the more cutting-edge industries in terms of their use of technology not only are you good negotiators but you you often are early adopters you guys were on the Big Data bandwagon early a lot of financial services firms we're kind of early on in Hadoop but I wonder if you could tell us a little bit about sort of the business drivers and and where's the poor the pressure point that are informing your digital strategy your your data and data op strategy sure yeah I think that one of the key areas for us is that we're trying to shift from more of a reactive mode into more of a predictive prescriptive mode from a data and analytics perspective and using our data to infuse and drive more business decisions but also to infuse it in actual applications and customer experience etc so we have a wealth of data at our fingertips we're really focused on starting to build out that data link style strategy make sure that we're kind of ahead of the curve as far as trying to predict what our end users are going to need and some of the advanced use cases we're going to have before we even know that they actually exist right so it's really trying to prepare us for the future and what's next and and then abling and empowering the business to be able to pivot when we need to without having everything perfect that they prescribed and and ready for what if we could talk about a little bit about the data journey I know it's kind of a buzzword but in my career as a independent observer and analyst I've kind of watched the promise of whether it was decision support systems or enterprise data warehouse you know give that 360 degree view of the business the the real-time nature the the customer intimacy all that in and up until sort of the recent digital you know meme I feel as though the industry hasn't lived up to that promise so I wonder if you could take us through the journey and tell us sort of where you came from and where you are today and I really want to sort of understand some of the successes they've had sure no that's a that's a great point nice I feel like as an industry I think we're at a point now where the the people process technology have sort of all caught up to each other right I feel that that real-time streaming analytics the data service mentality just leveraging web services and API is more throughout our organization in our industry as a whole I feel like that's really starting to take shape right now and and all the pieces of that puzzle have come together so kind of where we started from a journey perspective it was it was very much if your your legacy reporting data warehouse mindset of tell me tell me the data elements that you think you're going to need we'll figure out how do we map those in and form them we'll figure out how to get those prepared for you and that whole lifecycle that waterfall mentality of how do we get this through the funnel and get it to users quality was usually there the the enablement was still there but it was missing that that rapid turnaround it was also missing the the what's next right than what you haven't thought of and almost to a point of just discouraging people from asking for too many things because it got too expensive it got too hard to maintain there was some difficulty in that space so some of the things that we're trying to do now is build that that enablement mentality of encouraging people to ask for everything so when we bring out new systems - the bank is no longer an option as far as how much data they're going to send to us right we're getting all of the data we're going to we're going to bring that all together for people and then really starting to figure out how can this data now be used and and we almost have to push that out and infuse it within our organization as opposed to waiting for it to be asked for so I think that all of the the concepts so that bringing that people process and then now the tools and capabilities together has really started to make a move for us and in the industry I mean it's really not an uncommon story right you had a traditional data warehouse system you had you know some experts that you had to go through to get the data the business kind of felt like it didn't own the data you know it felt like it was imposing every time it made a request or maybe it was frustrated because it took so long and then by the time they got the data perhaps you know the market had shifted so it create a lot of frustration and then to your point but but it became very useful as a reporting tool and that was kind of this the sweet spot so so how did you overcome that and you know get to where you are today and you know kind of where are you today I was gonna say I think we're still overcoming that we'll see it'll see how this all goes right I think there's there's a couple of things that you know we've started to enable first off is just having that a concept of scale and enablement mentality and everything that we do so when we bring systems on we bring on everything we're starting to have those those components and pieces in place and we're starting to build more framework base reusable processes and procedures so that every ask is not brand new it's not this reinvent the wheel and resolve for for all that work so I think that's helped if expedite our time to market and really get some of the buy-in and support from around the organization and it's really just finding the right use cases and finding the different business partners to work with and partner with so that you help them through their journey as well is there I'm there on a similar roadmap and journey for for their own life cycles as well in their product element or whatever business line there so from a process standpoint that you kind of have to jettison the you mentioned waterfall before and move to a more being an agile approach did it require different different skill sets talk about the process and the people side of yeah it's been a it's been a shift we've tried to shift more towards I wouldn't call us more formal agile I would say we're a little bit more lean from a an iterative backlog type of approach right so what are you putting that work together in queues and having the queue of B reprioritized working with the business owners to help through those things has been a key success criteria for us and how we start to manage that work as opposed to opening formal project requests and and having all that work have to funnel through some of the old channels that like you mentioned earlier kind of distracted a little bit from from the way things had been done in the past and added some layers that people felt potentially wouldn't be necessary if they thought it was a small ask in their eyes you know I think it also led to a lot of some of the data silos and and components that we have in place today in the industry and I don't think our company is alone and having data silos and components of data in different locations but those are there for a reason though those were there because they're they're filling a need that has been missing or a gap in the solution so what we're trying to do is really take that to heart and evaluate what can we do to enable those mindsets and those mentalities and find out what was the gap and why did they have to go get a siloed solution or work around operations and technology and the channels that had been in place what would you say well your biggest challenges in getting from point A to point B point B being where you are today there were challenges on each of the components of the pillar right so people process technology people are hard to change right men behavioral type changes has been difficult that there's components of that that definitely has been in place same with the process side right so so changing it into that backlog style mentality and working with the users and having more that be sort of that maintenance type support work is is a different call culture for our organization and traditional project management and then the tool sets right the the tools and capabilities we had to look in and evaluate what tools do we need to Mabel this behavior in this mentality how do we enable more self-service the exploration how do we get people the data that they need when they need it and empower them to use so maybe you could share with us some of the outcomes and I know it's yeah we're never done in this business but but thinking about you know the investments that you've made in intact people in reprocessing you know the time it takes to get leadership involved what has been so far anyway the business outcome and you share any any metrics or it is sort of subjective a guidance I yeah I think from a subjective perspective the some of the biggest things for us has just been our ability to to truly start to have that very 60 degree view of the customer which we're probably never going to get they're officially right there's there everyone's striving for that but the ability to have you know all of that data available kind of at our fingertips and have that all consolidated now into one one location one platform and start to be that hub that starts to redistribute that data to our applications and infusing that out has been a key component for us I think some of the other big kind of components are differentiators for us and value that we can show from an organizational perspective we're in an M&A mode right so we're always looking from a merger and acquisition perspective our the model that we've built out from a data strategy perspective has proven itself useful over and over now in that M&A mentality of how do you rapidly ingest new data sets it had understood get it distributed to the right consumers it's fit our model exactly and and it hasn't been an exception it's been just part of our overall framework for how we get that data and it wasn't anything new that we had to do different because it was M&A just timelines were probably a little bit more expedited the other thing that's been interesting in some of the world that were in now right from a a Kovach perspective and having a pivot and start to change some of the way we do business and some of the PPP loans and and our business models sort of had to change overnight and our ability to work with our different lines of business and get them the data they need to help drive those decisions was another scenario where had we not had the foundational components there in the platform there to do some of this if we would have spun a little bit longer so your data ops approach I'm gonna use that term helped you in this in this kovat situation I mean you had the PPE you had you know of slew of businesses looking to get access to that money you had uncertainty with regard to kind of what the rules of the game were what you was the bank you had a Judah cape but you it was really kind of opaque in terms of what you had to do the volume of loans had to go through the roof in the time frame it was like within days or weeks that you had to provide these so I wonder if we could talk about that a little bit and how you're sort of approach the data helped you be prepared for that yeah no it was a race I mean the bottom line was it felt like a race right from from industry perspective as far as how how could we get this out there soon enough fast enough provide the most value to our customers our applications teams did a phenomenal job on enabling the applications to help streamline some of the application process for the loans themselves but from a data and reporting perspective behind the scenes we were there and we had some tools and capabilities and readiness to say we have the data now in our in our lake we can start to do some business driven decisions around all all of the different components of what's being processed on a daily basis from an application perspective versus what's been funded and how do those start to funnel all the way through doing some data quality checks and operational reporting checks to make sure that that data move properly and got booked in in the proper ways because of the rapid nature of how that was was all being done other covent type use cases as well we had some some different scenarios around different feed reporting and and other capabilities that the business wasn't necessarily prepared for we wouldn't have planned to have some of these types of things and reporting in place that we were able to give it because we had access to all the data because of these frameworks that we had put into place that we could pretty rapidly start to turn around some of those data some of those data points and analytics for us to make some some better decisions so given the propensity in the pace of M&A there has to be a challenge fundamentally in just in terms of data quality consistency governance give us the before and after you know before kind of before being the before the data ops mindset and after being kind of where you are today I think that's still a journey we're always trying to get better on that as well but the data ops mindset for us really has has shifted us to start to think about automation right pipelines that enablement a constant improvement and and how do we deploy faster deploy more consistently and and have the right capabilities in place when we need it so you know where some of that has come into place from an M&A perspective is it's really been around the building scale into everything that we do dezq real-time nature this scalability the rapid deployment models that we have in place is really where that starts to join forces and really become become powerful having having the ability to rapidly ingesting new data sources whether we know about it or not and then exposing that and having the tools and platforms be able to expose that to our users and enable our business lines whether it's covent whether it's M&A the use cases keep coming up right they we keep running into the same same concept which is how rapidly get people the data they need when they need it but still provide the rails and controls and make sure that it's governed and controllable on the way as well [Music] about the tech though wonder if we could spend some time on that I mean can you paint a picture of us so I thought what what what we're looking at here you've got you know some traditional IDI w's involved I'm sure you've got lots of data sources you you may be one of the zookeepers from the the Hadoop days with a lot of you know experimentation there may be some machine intelligence and they are painting a pic before us but sure no so we're kind of evolving some of the tool sets and capabilities as well we have some some generic kind of custom in-house build ingestion frameworks that we've started to build out for how to rapidly ingest and kind of script out the nature of of how we bring those data sources into play what we're what we've now started as well as is a journey down IBM compact product which is really gonna it's providing us that ability to govern and control all of our data sources and then start to enable some of that real-time ad hoc analytics and data preparation data shaping so some of the components that we're doing in there is just around that data discovery pointing that data sources rapidly running data profiles exposing that data to our users obviously very handy in the emanating space and and anytime you get new data sources in but then the concept of publishing that and leveraging some of the AI capabilities of assigning business terms in the data glossary and those components is another key component for us on the on the consumption side of the house for for data we have a couple of tools in place where Cognos shop we do a tableau from a data visualization perspective as well that what that were we're leveraging but that's where cloud pack is now starting to come into play as well from a data refinement perspective and giving the ability for users to actually go start to shape and prep their data sets all within that governed concept and then we've actually now started down the enablement path from an AI perspective with Python and R and we're using compact to be our orchestration tool to keep all that governed and controlled as well enable some some new AI models and some new technologies in that space we're actually starting to convert all of our custom-built frameworks into python now as well so we start to have some of that embedded within cloud pack and we can start to use some of the rails of those frameworks with it within them okay so you've got the ingest and ingestion side you've done a lot of automation it sounds like called the data profiling that's maybe what classification and automating that piece and then you've got the data quality piece the governance you got visualization with with tableau and and this kind of all fits together in a in an open quote unquote open framework is that right yeah I exactly I mean the the framework itself from our perspective where we're trying to keep the tools as as consistent as we can we really want to enable our users to have the tools that they need in the toolbox and and keep all that open what we're trying to focus on is making sure that they get the same data the same experience through whatever tool and mechanism that they're consuming from so that's where that platform mentality comes into place having compact in the middle to help govern all that and and reprovision some of those data sources out for us has it has been a key component for us well see if it sounds like you're you know making a lot of progress or you know so the days of the data temple or the high priest of data or the sort of keepers of that data really to more of a data culture where the businesses kind of feel ownership for their own data you believe self-service I think you've got confidence much more confident than the in the compliance and governance piece but bring us home just in terms of that notion of data culture and where you are and where you're headed no definitely I think that's that's been a key for us too as as part of our strategy is really helping we put in a strategy that helps define and dictate some of those structures and ownership and make that more clear some of the of the failures of the past if you will from an overall my monster data warehouse was around nobody ever owned it there was there wasn't you always ran that that risk of either the loudest consumer actually owned it or no one actually owned it what we've started to do with this is that Lake mentality and and having all that data ingested into our our frameworks the data owners are clear-cut it's who sends that data in what is the book record system for that source data we don't want a ability we don't touch it we don't transform it as we load it it sits there and available you own it we're doing the same mentality on the consumer side so we have we have a series of structures from a consumption perspective that all of our users are consuming our data if it's represented exactly how they want to consume it so again that ownership we're trying to take out a lot of that gray area and I'm enabling them to say yeah I own this I understand what I'm what I'm going after and and I can put the the ownership and the rule and rules and the stewardship around that as opposed to having that gray model in the middle that that that we never we never get but I guess to kind of close it out really the the concept for us is enabling people and end-users right giving them the data that they need when they need it and it's it's really about providing the framework and then the rails around around doing that and it's not about building out a formal bill warehouse model or a formal lessor like you mentioned before some of the you know the ivory tower type concepts right it's really about purpose-built data sets getting the giving our users empowered with the data they need when they need it all the way through and fusing that into our applications so that the applications and provide the best user experiences and and use the data to our advantage all about enabling the business I got a shove all I have you how's that IBM doing you know as a as a partner what do you like what could they be doing better to make your life easier sure I think I think they've been a great partner for us as far as that that enablement mentality the cloud pack platform has been a key for us we wouldn't be where we are without that tool said I our journey originally when we started looking at tools and modernization of our staff was around data quality data governance type components and tools we now because of the platform have released our first Python I models into the environment we have our studio capabilities natively because of the way that that's all container is now within cloud back so we've been able to enable new use cases and really advance us where we would have a time or a lot a lot more technologies and capabilities and then integrate those ourselves so the ability to have that all done has or and be able to leverage that platform has been a key to helping us get some of these roles out of this as quickly as we have as far as a partnership perspective they've been great as far as listening to what what the next steps are for us where we're headed what can we what do we need more of what can they do to help us get there so it's it's really been an encouraging encouraging environment I think they as far as what can they do better I think it's just keep keep delivering write it delivery is ping so keep keep releasing the new functionality and features and keeping the quality of the product intact well see it was great having you on the cube we always love to get the practitioner angle sounds like you've made a lot of progress and as I said when we're never finished in this industry so best of luck to you stay safe then and thanks so much for for sharing appreciate it thank you all right and thank you for watching everybody this is Dave Volante for the cube data ops in action we got the crowd chat a little bit later get right there but right back right of this short break [Music] [Music]

Published Date : May 28 2020

**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
WisconsinLOCATION

0.99+

Dave VolantePERSON

0.99+

Associated BankORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Steve LucasPERSON

0.99+

Steven LueckPERSON

0.99+

pythonTITLE

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

360 degreeQUANTITY

0.99+

MinnesotaLOCATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

60 degreeQUANTITY

0.99+

PythonTITLE

0.99+

todayDATE

0.98+

BostonLOCATION

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.97+

eachQUANTITY

0.95+

ActonORGANIZATION

0.94+

CognosORGANIZATION

0.94+

M&ATITLE

0.92+

one platformQUANTITY

0.91+

oneQUANTITY

0.9+

Corvis concenORGANIZATION

0.87+

MidwestLOCATION

0.87+

RTITLE

0.86+

Upper MidwestLOCATION

0.83+

IBM DataOps in ActionORGANIZATION

0.81+

one locationQUANTITY

0.79+

agileTITLE

0.78+

a couple of yearsQUANTITY

0.75+

M&AORGANIZATION

0.7+

point BOTHER

0.69+

Illinois WisconsinLOCATION

0.68+

couple of toolsQUANTITY

0.67+

pointOTHER

0.52+

couple of thingsQUANTITY

0.5+

JudahPERSON

0.31+

HadoopLOCATION

0.28+

Brian Reagan, Actifio | CUBEConversation January 2020


 

from the silicon angle media office in Boston Massachusetts it's the queue now here's your host Stu minimun hi this is a cute conversation from our Boston area studio I'm Stu minimun and joining for this deep dive into partnership discussions is Brian Regan the CMO of activity Oh Brian great to see you and happy 2020 great to see you used to thanks all right so we had a conversation with yourself and a shuch talking about 10c some of the activities the general momentum of ectopy oh but really want to spend a little bit of time talking about partnerships so Activia being a software company always has add a number of partnerships so you know when we talk a little bit of just the philosophy of the company and you know how important that is for you know technology partnerships as well as the go-to-market absolutely and I think we you know in 2019 we really increased our focus our investments and really our entire company alignment towards five types of partners specifically one was relatively new partnership for us which is a software partnership with IBM and their data and AI division of IBM under Arvid Krishna and Rob Thomas that we really the OEM our product to go after the test data management market opportunity and really become a data platform for a lot of their initiatives that involve Watson and and analytics as well as test data management that was a huge new partnership for us in 2019 well of course a new area of partnership because IBM I understand is probably the longest and oldest partnership that activity oh is that absolutely so the software group was probably the last group that we have partnered with in inside of the IBM corporation but we saw incredible traction throughout the year great pipeline growth from literally the beginning of the the Inc signing the the paper and have a roster of incredible logos to show for it over the last 12 months yeah it's always interesting to look if you talk about software and how a ifit's to it that was 2019 one of the things we said just you know okay what is AI are along that spectrum but you know how do these things stitch together everything to a Maya feed for the training algorithms or there are other things I can do so that sounds like you found some areas where customers are going to be working at leveraging your solution absolutely and certainly with IBM's acquisition of Red Hat and their embrace of containers and kubernetes that application modernization intersection point where we can bring data into containers is going to be a big theme for us in 2020 as well okay exciting stuff so that's on the software piece so if you have software hardware still matters into C 20 it turns out we still need to run things on servers and storage so and and switches and the like so we're fortunate to have partnered with Dell EMC as one of our focus infrastructure partners we have reference architectures for converged infrastructure using the rail and their rack designs on the VX flex OS underneath and really going after the database cloning market opportunity so bringing a essentially a data center pod architecture with Activia software running inside to power these databases of service opportunities that exist in a large enterprises alright interesting that you know EMC was not one that I would have thought would have been the first one to partnership Dell EMC with a much broader portfolio it seems a natural fit absolutely and and we were excited actually to based on client demand to also introduce the support to write to data domain so we can actually support data domain essentially we treated almost like an object target to increase the useful life and actually increase the power of data domain within these broader infrastructures that the enterprise clients have you know I had a great conversation with the shuch talking about what one of the things about 10 C is we've known for a long time that object storage is so important for the storage industry and where we want to go but customers shouldn't have to think about it it's just how we enable that and that leads up to of course cloud is big piece absolutely NC there so so where the important partnership from a cloud standpoint so certainly all of the clouds for us in our multi cloud effort are important we we support seven of the hyper scalars and and certainly you know Alibaba cloud IBM cloud Oracle cloud VMware cloud in addition to the three that people think about most but from a go-to-market standpoint we were probably the most embedded with Google cloud over the last year to 18 months again we've aligned a lot of both go to market but also engineering efforts to make sure that we're supporting Google cloud in the best way possible bringing the most compelling and differentiated offerings particularly for database workloads for backup dr and ultimately database cloning well congratulations important partnership especially when you talk about that engineering standpoint Google is not one just to make oh you know we made a handshake and it's good it really they dig in from an engineering standpoint and we know that Google makes the smartest stuff out there they'll tell you that so if you you've gone through the wringer on that that that really speaks to the architectural absolutely piece of the environment and and credit to a shook in the entire engineering organization I mean that is to your point very much an engineering first and then go to market second type of relationship and we're delighted to be in the go-to-market side of that okay go to market then is probably another way piece of absolutely so the last two types of partners that were really focused on for 2020 and we certainly got very serious in 2019 one is global systems integrators and TCS has really emerged is a really key partner for us in that landscape when we think about the enterprise accounts that we target you know a billion and up in revenue they're in every single one of them and we have several wins that we can look back on 2019 and credit their influence they are certainly helping the application modernization initiatives within all of these enterprises and partnering with active Pheo to really bring a data management and test data management capability to bear really was an important step for us in nineteen that we hope to accelerate in 2020 and then the the last piece and last but not least from a go-to-market standpoint is the chat and you know important channel partners whether it's Trace 3 particularly on the west coast whether it's data trend you know from the Midwest and East Coast these types of channel partners have really helped us you know become embedded in some of the largest accounts in in North America as well as globally and really are the the trusted adviser inside of those accounts that we want to continue to enable with compelling differentiated offerings like Tennessee yeah there were a lot of transformations going on in the channel they were all trying to figure out how they live in that multi-cloud world seems a natural fit for those that are thriving and surviving absolutely in this era that those would be the ones that you'd be working with absolutely so as a software company you know the part of our power is the ecosystem power and but we believe that by continuing to foster these multifaceted relationships they all have actually really fascinating benefits across the board the IBM relationship for example has ecosystem benefits in their channel and their systems integrators the Dell EMC relationship has you know ripple effects into their channel and their distribution points of distribution so we believe it's a very complimentary ecosystem that we're building we're excited at the possibility of an even stronger 2020 because of it awesome the one that you mentioned actually in our earlier conversation talking about active intensity si P of course a big important partner also a huge it's an important partner from a standpoint of it's maybe the most critical workload in most enterprises that use sa P and being a part of their technology stack inside of the Hana enterprise cloud is a critical capability for us but it's also an important point of distribution as they go out to their enterprise customers and are looking to become more relevant in a broader sense of data management so we're certainly excited about the work that we're doing with them we're delighted about the influence that they've had in terms of our roadmap and pushing our platform to be even more capable particularly for Hana workloads all right a lot of different pieces Brian congratulations on all that happened in 2019 and looking forward to watching the momentum in 2020 Thanks looking forward to being back all right lots more coverage from us at the cube dotnet of course will be lots of shows feel free to reach out on Twitter I'm at Stu and thank you for watching the cube

Published Date : Jan 6 2020

**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

January 2020DATE

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

Brian ReganPERSON

0.99+

EMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

Rob ThomasPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

BrianPERSON

0.99+

Arvid KrishnaPERSON

0.99+

North AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

five typesQUANTITY

0.99+

Brian ReaganPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

Stu minimunPERSON

0.99+

C 20TITLE

0.99+

HanaORGANIZATION

0.99+

first oneQUANTITY

0.98+

Boston MassachusettsLOCATION

0.98+

ActiviaORGANIZATION

0.97+

10 CTITLE

0.97+

sevenQUANTITY

0.97+

TCSORGANIZATION

0.96+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

MayaTITLE

0.95+

18 monthsQUANTITY

0.93+

VX flexTITLE

0.92+

a billionQUANTITY

0.91+

bothQUANTITY

0.91+

nineteenQUANTITY

0.9+

MidwestLOCATION

0.9+

last yearDATE

0.88+

Dell EMCORGANIZATION

0.87+

second typeQUANTITY

0.86+

TennesseeLOCATION

0.86+

two typesQUANTITY

0.85+

lots of showsQUANTITY

0.83+

East CoastLOCATION

0.83+

last 12 monthsDATE

0.82+

Red HatTITLE

0.8+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.8+

PheoORGANIZATION

0.77+

Google cloudTITLE

0.71+

firstQUANTITY

0.69+

coastLOCATION

0.68+

TwitterTITLE

0.66+

Alibaba cloudORGANIZATION

0.65+

partnersQUANTITY

0.64+

cubeORGANIZATION

0.63+

singleQUANTITY

0.61+

Trace 3COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.58+

cloudTITLE

0.55+

lot ofQUANTITY

0.55+

10cQUANTITY

0.53+

WatsonORGANIZATION

0.49+

dotnetORGANIZATION

0.38+

Chandler Hoisington, D2iQ | D2iQ Journey to Cloud Native


 

>>from San Francisco. It's the queue every day to thank you. Brought to you by day to like you. Hey, >>welcome back already, Jeffrey. Here with the Cube were a day to IQ's headquarters in downtown San Francisco. They used to be metal sphere, which is what you might know them as. And they've rebranded earlier this year. And they're really talking about helping Enterprises in their journey to cloud native. And we're really excited to have really one of the product guys he's been here and seeing this journey and how through with the customers and helping the company transforming his Chandler hosing tonight. He's the s VP of engineering and product. Chandler, great to see you. Thanks. So, first off, give everyone kind of a background on on the day to like you. I think a lot of people knew mesosphere. You guys around making noise? What kind of changed in the marketplace to to do a rebranding? >>Sure. Yeah, we've been obviously, Mason's here in the past and may so so I think a lot of people watching the cube knows No, no one knows about Mace ose as as we were going along our journey as a company. We noticed that a lot of people are also asking for carbonates. Eso We've actually been working with kubernetes since I don't know 16 4017 something that for a while now and as Maur Maur as communities ecosystem starting involving mature more. We also want to jump in and take advantage of that. And we started building some products that were specific to kubernetes and eso. We thought, Look, you know, it's a little bit confusing for people May, SOS and Kubernetes and at times those two technologies were seen almost as competitive, even though we didn't always see it that way. The market saw it that way, so we said, Look, this is going too confusing for customers being called Mesa Sphere. Let's let's rebrand around Maur what we really do. And we felt like what we do is not just focus around one specific technology. We felt like we helped customers with more than that more than just may so support more than just community support, Andi said. Look, let's let's get us a name that shows what we actually do for customers, and that's really helping them take their workloads and put them on on Not just, you know, um, a source platform, but actually take their workloads, bring them into production and enterprise way. That's really ready for day two. And that's that's why we called it data. >>And let's unpack the day to, cause I think some people are really familiar with the concept of day two. And for some people, they probably never heard it. But it's a pretty interesting concept, and I think it packs a lot of meaning in it. A number of letters. I think you >>can kind of just think about it if you were writing software, right? I mean, Day zero is okay. We're gonna design it. We're gonna start playing with some ideas. We're gonna pull into different technologies. We're gonna do a POC. We're gonna build our skateboards. So to say, that's kind of your day. Zero. What do we want? Okay, we're gonna build a Data Analytics pipeline. We want spark. We're going to store data. Cassandra, we're gonna use cough. Go to pass it around. We're gonna run our containers on top of communities. That's just kind of your day. Zero idea. You get it working, you slap it on a cluster. Things are good right? Day one might be okay. Let's actually do a beta put in production in some kind of way. You start getting customers using it. But now, in Day two, after all that's done, you're like, Wait a second. Things were going wrong. Where's our monitoring? We didn't set that up. Where's our logging? Oh, I don't know. Like, >>who do we >>call this? Our container Run time, we think has above. Who do we call like? Oh, I don't know What support contract that we cut, Right? So that's the things that we want to help customers with. We want to help them in the whole journey, getting to Day two. But once they're there, we want them to be ready for day two, right? And that's what we do. >>I love it because one of my favorite quotes I've used it 1000 times. I'll do 2001 right? Is that open source is free like a puppy. Exactly for you. When you leave you guys, you're not writing a check necessarily to the to the shelter, But there's a whole lot of other check. You got a right and take care of. And I think that's such a key piece. Thio Enterprise, right. They need somebody to call when that thing breaks. >>Yeah. I mean, I haven't come from enterprise company. I was actually a customer basis Fear before I joined. Yeah, that's exactly why we're customers that we wanted. Not only that, insurance policy, but someone that partner with us as we start figuring this out, you know? I mean, just picking. You know what container run time do I want to use with communities? That one decision could take months if you're not familiar with it. And you you put a couple of your best architects on it. Go research container. You go research, cryo go research doctor. Tell me what's what's the best one we should use with kubernetes. Whereas if you're going, if you have a partnership with a company like day two, you can say, Look, I trust these. You know this company, they they're they're experts of this and they see a lot of this. Let's go with their recommendation. It's >>okay. So you got you got your white board. You've got a whole bunch of open source things going on, right? And you've got a whole bunch of initiatives and the pressure's coming down from from on high to get going, you've got containers, Asian and Cloud native and hybrid Cloud all the stuff. And then you've got some port CEO on his team trying to figure it out. You guys have a whole plethora of service is around some of these products. So as you try it and then you got the journey right and you don't start from from a standing start. You gotta go. You gotta go. So how do you map out the combination of how people progress through their journey? What are the different types of systems that they want to put in place and into, prioritize and have some type of a logical successful implementation and roll out of these things from day zero day 132? No, it's >>a great question. I think that's actually how we formed our product. Strategy is we've been doing this for a while now and we've we've gone. We've gone on this journey with really big advanced customers like ride sharing companies and large telcos customers like that. We've also gone on this journey with smaller, less sophisticated customers like, you know, industrial customers from the Midwest. Right? And those are two very, very different customers. But what's similar is they're both going on the same journey we feel like, but they're just at different places. So we wanted to build products, find the customer where they're at in their journey, and the way we see it really is just at the very beginning. It's just training, right? So we have, ah, bunch of support. We're sorry. Service is around training. Help you understand? Not just kubernetes, but the whole cloud native ecosystem. So what is all this stuff? How does it work? How does it fit together? How do I just deploy simple app to right? That's the beginning of it. We also have some products in that area as well, to help people scale their training across the whole whole organization. So that's really exciting for us once once, once that customer has their training down there like Okay, look, get I need a cluster now, like I need a destroyer of sorts and criminals itself is great, but it needs a lot of pieces to actually get it ready for prime time. And that's where we build a product called Convoy Say Okay, here is your enterprise great. Ready to go kubernetes destro right out of the box. And that product is really it's what you could use to just fiddle around with communities. It's also what you put into production right on the game. That's that's been scale tested, security tests and mixed workload tested. It's everything. So that's that's kind of our communities. Destro. So you've gotten your training. You have your destro and now you're like, OK, I actually wanna want to run some applesauce. >>Let me hold there. Is it Is it open corps? Or, you know, there's a lot of conversation in the way the boys actually >>the way we built convoy. It's a great question. The way we build convoys said, Okay, we don't We want to pick the best of breed from each of these. Have you seen the cloud native ecosystem kind of like >>by charter, high charter, whatever it is, where they have all the logos and all the different spiral thing. So it's crazy. Got thousands of logos, right? And >>we said, Look, we're gonna navigate this for you. What's the best container run time to pick. And it's It's almost as if we were gonna build this for ourselves using all open source technology. So convoys completely opens. Okay, um, there's some special sauce that we put in on how to bring these things together. Install it. But all the actual components itself is open source. Okay, so that's so if you're a customer, you're like, OK, I want open source. I don't want to be tied to any specific vendor. I want to run on Lee open. So >>yeah, I was just thinking in terms of you know, how Duke is a reference right. And you had, you know, the Horton worst cloud there and map our strategies, which were radically different in the way they actually packaged told a dupe under the covers. Yeah, >>you can think of it similar. How Cloudera per ship, Possibly where they had cdh. And they brought in a lot of open source. But they also had a lot of proprietary components to see th and what we've tried to get away from it is tying someone in tow. Us. I know that sounds counterintuitive from a business perspective, but we don't want customers to feel like if I go with D to like you. I always have to go with me to like you. I have to drink the Kool Aid, and I'm never gonna be able to get off. >>Kind of not. Doesn't really go with the open source. Exactly this stuff. It's not >>right for our customers, right? A lot of our customers want that optionality, and they don't want to feel locked in. And so when we built convoy, he said, Look, you know, if we were to start our own company, not not an infrastructure coming that we are right now, but just a software company build any kind of ab How would we approach it? And that was one of the problems we saw for We don't wanna feel like we're tied into any. >>Right. Okay, so you got to get the training, you got the products. What's >>next? What's next is if you think about the journey, you're like, OK, a lot. What we've found and this may or may not be totally true is one of the first things people like to run on committees is actually they're builds. So see, I see. And we said, How can we help with this. We looked around the market and there's a lot of great see, I see products out there right now. There's get lab, which is great partner of ours. It's a great product. There's there's your older products. Like Jenkins. There's a bunch of sass products, Travis. See all these things. But what we we wanted to do if we were customers of our own products is something that was native to Kubernetes. And so we started looking at projects like tectonic and proud. Some of these projects, right? And we said, How can we do the same thing we did with convoy where we bring these projects together and make it easy for someone to adopt these kubernetes native. See, I see tools. And we did some stuff there that we think is pretty innovative as well. And that's what that's the product we call dispatch. >>Okay. What do you got? More than just products. You've got profession service. That's right. So now >>you need help setting all this up. How do you actually bring your legacy applications to this new platform? How do you get your legacy builds onto these new build systems That that's where our service is coming the plate and kind of steer you through this whole journey. Lastly, what we next in the journey, though? Those service's compliment Really? Well, with with the kind of the rest of the product suite, right? And we didn't just stop with C i c. He said, what is the next type of work that we want to run here? Okay, so there we looked at things like red hat operators. Right? And we said, Look, red hats doing really cool thing here with this operator framework, how can we simplify it? We learn we've done a lot of this before with D. C. O s, where we built what we called the DCS sdk to help people bring advanced complex workloads onto that platform. And we saw a lot of similarities with operators to our d c West sdk. We said, How can we bring some of our understanding and knowledge to that world? And we built this open source product called kudo. Okay, people are free to go check that out. And that's how we bring more advanced workload. So if you think about the journey back to the journey again, you got some training you have your have your cluster, you put your builds on it. Now you want to run some advance work logs? That's where Kudo comes. >>Okay? And then finally, at the end of the trail is 1 800 I need help. Well, almost into the trail. We're not there yet. There was one thing they're still moving with one more step right on >>the very last one. Actually, we said, Okay, what's next in this journey? And that's running multiple clusters of the same. Okay, so that's kind of the scale. That's the end of the journey from for us, for our proxy as it stands right now. And that's where you build a product called Commander. And that's really helping us launch and manage multiple >>companies clusters at the same time. >>So it's so great that you have the perspective of a customer and you bring that directly in two. You know what you want because you just have gone through this this journey. But I'm just curious, you know, if you put your old hat on, you know, kind of c i o your customer. You know, you just talked about the cake chart with Lord knows how many logos? How do you help people even just begin to think about about the choices and about the crazy rapid change in what? That I mean? Kubernetes wasn't a thing four years ago to help them stay on top of it to help them, you know, both kind of have a night to the vision, you know, make sure you're delivering today on not just get completely distracted by every bright, shiny object that happens to come along. Yeah, no, >>I think it's really challenging for the buyers. You know, I think there's a, especially as the industry continues to make sure there's a new concept that gets thrown at all times. Service Manager. You know, some new, cool way to do monitoring or logging right? And you almost feel like a dinosaur. If you're not right on top of these things to go to a conference in, are you using? You know, you know B P f. Yet what is that? You didn't feel right? Exactly. I think I think most importantly, what customers want is the ability what, the ability to move their technology and their platforms as their business has the need. If the need isn't there for the business, and the technology is running well. There shouldn't be a reason to move to a new platform. Our new set of technologies, in fact, with dese us with Mason charities. To us, we have a lot of happy customers that are gonna be moving crib. Amazing if they wanted to anytime soon. Do you see What's that? Something's that criminal is currently doesn't do. It may never do because the community is just not focused on it that DCS is solving. And those customers just want to see that will continue to support them in the journey that they're on with their their business. And I think that's what's most important is just really understanding our customer's understanding their business, understand where they wanna go. What are their goals, So to say, for their technology platforms and and making sure you were always one step ahead >>of them, that's a >>good place to be one step ahead of demand. All right, well, thanks for for taking a few minutes and sharing the story. Appreciate it. Okay. Thank you. All right. Thanks. Chandler. I'm Jeff. You're watching >>the Cube. Where? Day two. I >>Q in downtown San Francisco. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time

Published Date : Nov 7 2019

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by day to like you. What kind of changed in the marketplace to to do a rebranding? And we started building some products that were specific to kubernetes and eso. I think you can kind of just think about it if you were writing software, right? So that's the things that we want to help customers with. And I think that's such a key piece. And you you put a couple of your best architects on it. So you got you got your white board. And that's where we build a product called Convoy Say Okay, here is your enterprise great. Or, you know, there's a lot of conversation the way we built convoy. And What's the best container run time to pick. And you had, you know, the Horton worst cloud there and map our strategies, but we don't want customers to feel like if I go with D to like you. Doesn't really go with the open source. And so when we built convoy, he said, Look, you know, if we were to start our own company, Okay, so you got to get the training, you got the products. And we said, How can we do the same thing we did with convoy where we bring these projects So now And we said, Look, red hats doing really cool thing here with this operator framework, how can we simplify it? And then finally, at the end of the trail is 1 And that's where you build a product called Commander. So it's so great that you have the perspective of a customer and you bring that directly in And you almost feel like a dinosaur. the story. I We'll see you next time

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

AndiPERSON

0.99+

CassandraPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Chandler HoisingtonPERSON

0.99+

1000 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

ChandlerPERSON

0.99+

2001DATE

0.99+

MasonORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

TravisPERSON

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

four years agoDATE

0.98+

Mesa SphereORGANIZATION

0.98+

thousands of logosQUANTITY

0.98+

two technologiesQUANTITY

0.97+

DukeORGANIZATION

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

Day twoQUANTITY

0.96+

day twoQUANTITY

0.96+

JenkinsPERSON

0.96+

eachQUANTITY

0.95+

16 4017OTHER

0.95+

SOSORGANIZATION

0.95+

Day oneQUANTITY

0.94+

firstQUANTITY

0.94+

Mace oseORGANIZATION

0.92+

tonightDATE

0.92+

Zero ideaQUANTITY

0.92+

ChandlerORGANIZATION

0.92+

IQORGANIZATION

0.92+

DCSORGANIZATION

0.91+

ClouderaORGANIZATION

0.9+

one stepQUANTITY

0.9+

one thingQUANTITY

0.9+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.9+

KubernetesPERSON

0.89+

KubernetesORGANIZATION

0.88+

MidwestLOCATION

0.88+

HortonORGANIZATION

0.87+

one more stepQUANTITY

0.85+

EsoORGANIZATION

0.82+

DCSTITLE

0.8+

LeeORGANIZATION

0.79+

earlier this yearDATE

0.78+

Thio EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.78+

C.TITLE

0.78+

onceQUANTITY

0.78+

1 800QUANTITY

0.77+

D2iQPERSON

0.74+

one specific technologyQUANTITY

0.74+

ConvoyORGANIZATION

0.73+

Kool AidORGANIZATION

0.7+

D.ORGANIZATION

0.69+

dayQUANTITY

0.68+

one decisionQUANTITY

0.67+

a secondQUANTITY

0.66+

KudoPERSON

0.65+

MaurORGANIZATION

0.65+

LordPERSON

0.64+

WestORGANIZATION

0.6+

D2iQTITLE

0.59+

MayORGANIZATION

0.54+

ZeroQUANTITY

0.53+

DayOTHER

0.53+

zeroQUANTITY

0.52+

CTITLE

0.52+

AsianLOCATION

0.5+

tectonicTITLE

0.5+

dORGANIZATION

0.46+

132QUANTITY

0.43+

CubeTITLE

0.42+

Maur MaurPERSON

0.4+

OORGANIZATION

0.34+

Cloud NativeTITLE

0.33+

Mike Hineline, Accenture | Splunk .conf19


 

>>live from Las Vegas. It's the Cube covering Splunk dot com. 19. Brought to you by spunk. >>Welcome back to the Cube, everyone. I'm John Ferrier with an angle on the Cube here in Las Vegas for Splunk dot com. 19. It's there 10 years of their customer main event. All the top customers and partners were here and, of course, accuse. Been covering dot com for seven years at a great guests from a censure. Mike Heinlein. Ecosystem Adventures. Global Analytics Plays and offerings lead a century Now. First of all, welcome to the Q. Thank you, John says. You're always has >>long titles. It's a very long title. Your lead. That's a mouthful. Offerings. Yeah, this >>meanings to these titles of the century. This, like >>Esso, I'm part of the Ecosystem Adventures Group, which helps to incubate our various different channel partners. And Dr Service is with those partners and then within the splint partnership. I'm focused on driving analytics offerings with various different practices that are already considering analytics and taking those >>to market. So you guys have a relation with spunk is evolving pretty quickly. >>It is >>what's the future look like? What's the current path >>Well, as you may be aware, we recently renewed our partnership with Bronco back in February. After two and 1/2 years, we had achieved most of our goals. And where we were starting to see is that where our initial objective was to help our clients to get Maur costs takeout and risk associated with their I T and Security operations way also learned a few things along the way, which is the Splunk Analyze politics engine can also be used outside of I t and Security and we can start to take it into industry verticals. And so one of the exciting things that we're doing is we brought our digital practice into the tent with us. We renewed in February, way have a couple of years. We're looking into the future, and we're gonna not only double down in i t and Security, but we're also going to start to build business analytics and io ti type solutions on top of within the vertical industries that were focused on one >>of those industries. Can you share them? >>Yeah. Yeah, so? So it would be things like energy utilities where power line analytics to reduce the amount of vegetation that might take out power lines cause fires cause outages. Patient flow, which would be how to help accelerate getting patients through the e. R and also increase throughput. Four Hospitals within supply Chain We're doing number of different things way have four different offerings that focus on technology, telecom, retail, consumer goods and manufacturing. So, like industrial type clients, >>so pretty much standard vertical industry that we normally see that's cracking in the business. Yeah, so I'll get your thoughts on this. One of the observations I want to share with you and get your reaction is is that with cloud and with data, it's interesting these day. There's a really key part of all this you mentioned. I I t and Security. Obviously, it's pretty straightforward. You see, that way started adding machine learning and a I and the things that domain expertise of these verticals become the pacing item the ke ke i t, if you will with scale of that what's going on? That's right level. Are you seeing that this is a fertile ground for opportunities that how you guys see it? Can you >>you Absolutely I think I think where it centuries strong is in our industry, Ackerman not just to 19 security, but within different industry verticals on. Then you take our digital practice, which is where our data science is live, where they're developing advanced analytics models and essentially working with a lot of the open source modeling tools like python that integrates very well a Splunk. It gives us the opportunity to take that data that could be bundled up. It could be data rest, maybe three years of sales data, and we create a forecast with it and do that on top of spunk. Or maybe something where within a supply chain or a flow within a hospital, were able to use machine learning to start to move some of the computer and thought from human beings to machines >>were some of the innovative service is you guys have built on top of Splunk because they're enabling platform. So again, opportunities. What are you guys doing in the >>soles? So both in the retail and in the technology space, we've created a couple of punishment engines. When you think of a supply chain, I need to know what my forecast is. What do I plan to sell? How many items. Do I need to have an inventory in the warehouse and in the store? And then how am I gonna get those items? And then how many should I order the next day? So we're using Splint to figure all of that out. >>What sort of surprise? Learnings You've got a deal with flunk because has always seems to be a new revelation when people get data and they start playing with insights. Beyond that, some sort of business breakthroughs are weird. Things happen when you start playing with data. Any anecdotal surprises, their learnings. You've seen >>a, well, a tremendous number. And in fact, what what happens is when you start to open up the silos. So most of our clients are stuck with a lot of legacy technologies that they've acquired over the last two or three decades. Splunk enables to open that Optimus get insights that we couldn't before. So it could be it could be. I could get a patient through a particular process, you know, twice as fast is what historically had been able to do. Or maybe for examples, something that Doug Merit mentioned yesterday, which is where we're partying very closely with Splunk for human trafficking. We've created an offering where split it already gone out created Data Lake of a lot of data from educational entities. Ngo's government agencies we took that builds a machine learning on top of it and able to identify high value targets or establishments that have a high risk of human trafficking, which is already starting to get results. In Florida, >>you mentioned health care no multiple times, someone of your key verticals. >>It is one that's emerging is very exciting. And it's kind of evidence of where we're working really well, a sponge. A lot of cases we've developed things that we take into Splunk, and we go to market together. In this particular case, Splunk created patient flow, took it to us. And now we're working to identify about a dozen different hospitals where we're gonna go meet with their CEOs and talk to him about what we can do to help them increased profit and patient satisfaction at the same time. >>What some of those conversations, like when you go and knock on the doors and say, Hey, I got a new secret weapon to solve your problems because this is its new things that people have these problems that couldn't have attacked before in the past. Now they have potential capabilities. What are some of those conversations? Take out there like Come on in, educate me. I want to buy right away or door slammed in your face and get his attention. >>Well, so way just had a really exciting meeting with a very large brochure in the Midwest. And as was explaining the different things that we could do a Splunk she actually the head of supply chain. Excuse me. It almost seems like fairy dust to me. In other words, the hardest challenge that I have sometimes is able to say, Look, you're used to doing this 24 months, maybe 36 months. I think I could do it free in less than six, and that's just so hard for them to absorb. So So a lot of cases it's it's transitioning to Well, let us figure out how we could prove that to you. Doing some kind of a concept or a pilot. >>You know, it's interesting is that you know, when you see people get set up with data platform, it's kind of editor of stage. Let's set the foundation. Let's make sure things flowing in you well. And then they started getting some discoveries here and there, and then they get business value, and then it kind of goes to another level. I think this is where things I see you guys doing well and others here in the ecosystem floor, and that is that It's a workflow optimization issue, I think. Wait a minute, way have all this data. Well, let's go do this. That's a little bit more of a ballistic business process or some sort of. >>That's right. Your >>challenge. Is that how >>you Yes. So I would say you always have a business process, at least in the industry verticals, and you have a lot of data that silo on. Then you crack those silos open on, then it's really basically intersection of what we would call planning and execution, which is, for example, maybe I have on oil rig and I have a ship that is taking materials and people back and forth. But now I know that I have actual things. Head into that port where if I send this ship now, I'm gonna have to come back in the next 24 hours. If I hold that ship off for two or three hours, then I can get more materials and people on board, and I don't have to come back for another 48 hours. So now I've just reduced greatly my operating costs. >>And I think that's interesting. Is that you think about what you just said, Yeah, go back 15 years. What's the data base scheming and make that happen. Date is over there, it's over. They're gonna write a query that Leighton see. It never happens. >>It's Jackie, right? So we're kind of out of the business of trying to fit square pegs into relational round holes, which takes the better part of maybe 50% of a lot of projects to implement those solutions. And so, with spunk, you're basically dumping the date end and you're layering your scheme on top of it, which enables you to accelerate delivery. And additionally, I don't have to cobble together and stitched together multiple technologies to do ingestion analytic storage visualization so I could mobilize teams much more quickly. Then it would traditional solutions. >>You know, Mike, I'd love your thoughts on the center's transformation because looking at you. What you guys have done is a company. It's been interesting, a lot of successes. But firm's been around for a while, right? So impressed. Different names don't back the old school back minicomputers. You know, rolling out projects had long arises. Multiyear. Now the speedy a name has completely changed clouds. Here you got data. How has the Splunk on these Modern technology has changed the centers engagement practices. >>I think you're touching on what we would probably call agile delivery, right or continuous delivery, where our clients don't want to push off from shore into a big bang project where they don't get to see the results for 12 to 24 months. That's a lot of risk for them. So what's book enables us to do, really is to do a delivery and deliver value in Angel's sprints in three 12 you know, 16 weeks sprints where we're literally be giving them value. We also don't have to understand all of the data. If you're using relational databases, you pretty much have to understand everything before you push off from shore with spunk. I can no minimal amount and start and deliver value, and then as I go, I'm learning more about my data. I could deliver more use cases and more value. >>It's interesting, you know, go back to the old enterprise sales model. You know, you do a pilot or a POC poc that a pilot with pilots, a date and that's what months and then Then the decision makes. And then you got to start over for the time that it'll happen in about months. A year. Yeah, technology changes. >>That's right. >>You guys are doing essentially agile sprints that are kind of like a little Mini p O sees. That's that's correct. Docs are actually really work. >>That's right. That's >>the new seems like the new sales model is that >>Well, I would say it's something that, with the rapid prototyping capability, like a sponge that gives us that flexibility todo depending on what we're doing, we may not have that flexibility. We may be limited by the technology. >>How would you describe the strength of censure Splunk partnership? >>It's a very strong So like I mentioned before, we way started to a nap three years ago. Way just renewed that relationship in February, and we've added more practices from within Accenture like digital practice. So now we have strategy, digital technology and security. We're focusing in doubling down and security in our I T markets, but also then starting to explore new industry verticals in Business analytics and Io Ti. As I explained earlier, we're bringing things to Splunk in there helping us cell, and they're bringing things to Austin. We're helping themselves, and there's a lot of excitement. I mean, I think it's really a combination of the right people with the right industry knowledge at the right time with the right technology. >>Final question in the industry For a while, you see the waves pretty big wave run now. Lot of confluence coming together. Multiple different Durant cloud data scale, everything speed. What's exciting you these days? What's the big story that people should pay attention to right now? Well, in this space, I >>think it really dovetails into Doug Steam, and I don't mean Thio, really, you know, piggyback on that. But it's true, and that is that so many of our clients, you know, still have a lot of technical debt from decades ago, and we get to come in there and say, Look in a matter of weeks and months, we could help You make sense of this way, can help you capture revenue you couldn't capture before Dr Out costs that you couldn't drive out before and reduce risk that you couldn't reduce before. So I mean, it's it's probably the best time of my entire career. >>Frankly, Cooper, daddies and certainly containers helps. Yeah, make those legacy workloads somewhat compatible with modern infrastructure. When you have those technical debt conversations with customers kind of realizing like I'm on the verge of bankruptcy, what do I do it? Is it more advisor? You guys come in, more counseling slash get developed? >>Yeah, yeah, A lot of times it's It's helping them to come in and assess what their situation is. Help them build a road map into the future. Sometimes it's rationalizing some of the technical debt. Sometimes it's how can we augment what you already have? And then and then in the future is that reaches end of life. We almost just turn it off. But you're up and running, you know, on this other platform that we've augmented into that ecosystem >>So tech flow positive. >>There you go. >>Yeah, cash flow positive take from technical debt from checked bag. Mike. Thanks for coming up. Appreciate it. Thanks for the knights. Thanks for having me. Great insights. You get all the data and the insights here. Workflow is rocking the cube. Second day of three days. I'm John Barrymore coverage after this short break.

Published Date : Oct 24 2019

SUMMARY :

19. Brought to you by spunk. All the top customers and partners were here and, of course, accuse. It's a very long title. meanings to these titles of the century. And Dr Service is with those partners and then within the So you guys have a relation with spunk is evolving pretty quickly. And so one of the exciting things that we're doing is we brought our digital practice Can you share them? So it would be things like energy utilities where power line analytics One of the observations I want to share with you and get your reaction you Absolutely I think I think where it centuries strong is in our industry, What are you guys doing in the When you think of a supply chain, I need to know what Things happen when you start playing with And in fact, what what happens is when you start to And it's kind of evidence of where we're working really well, What some of those conversations, like when you go and knock on the doors and say, Hey, So So a lot of cases it's it's transitioning to Well, let us figure out how You know, it's interesting is that you know, when you see people get set up with data platform, it's kind of editor That's right. Is that how and you have a lot of data that silo on. Is that you think about what you just said, Yeah, go back 15 years. And additionally, I don't have to cobble together and stitched together multiple technologies to do What you guys have done is a company. sprints in three 12 you know, 16 weeks sprints where And then you got to start over for the time that it'll happen in about months. You guys are doing essentially agile sprints that are kind of like a little Mini That's right. We may be limited by the technology. It's a very strong So like I mentioned before, we way started to a nap three years Final question in the industry For a while, you see the waves pretty big wave run now. out before and reduce risk that you couldn't reduce before. When you have those technical debt Sometimes it's how can we augment what you already have? You get all the data and the insights here.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Mike HeinleinPERSON

0.99+

FebruaryDATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Mike HinelinePERSON

0.99+

John FerrierPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

FloridaLOCATION

0.99+

12QUANTITY

0.99+

MikePERSON

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

John BarrymorePERSON

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

BroncoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

24 monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

three hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

36 monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

16 weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

three daysQUANTITY

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

seven yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

48 hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

Ecosystem Adventures GroupORGANIZATION

0.99+

Doug MeritPERSON

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

AustinLOCATION

0.99+

JackiePERSON

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

pythonTITLE

0.99+

Ecosystem AdventuresORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

less than sixQUANTITY

0.99+

decades agoDATE

0.98+

three years agoDATE

0.98+

SplunkORGANIZATION

0.98+

Second dayQUANTITY

0.98+

ThioPERSON

0.97+

A yearQUANTITY

0.97+

twiceQUANTITY

0.97+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.96+

AckermanORGANIZATION

0.96+

EssoPERSON

0.94+

Splunk .conf19OTHER

0.92+

SplunkTITLE

0.91+

AccentureORGANIZATION

0.91+

next dayDATE

0.9+

FirstQUANTITY

0.89+

AngelPERSON

0.88+

Four HospitalsQUANTITY

0.85+

three decadesQUANTITY

0.84+

oneQUANTITY

0.84+

fourQUANTITY

0.82+

MultiyearQUANTITY

0.77+

DougORGANIZATION

0.74+

about a dozen different hospitalsQUANTITY

0.73+

After two and 1/2 yearsDATE

0.73+

MidwestLOCATION

0.73+

Dr ServiceORGANIZATION

0.71+

CooperPERSON

0.69+

LeightonORGANIZATION

0.68+

19QUANTITY

0.64+

next 24 hoursDATE

0.63+

SteamPERSON

0.6+

DurantORGANIZATION

0.53+

Data LakeORGANIZATION

0.53+

bigEVENT

0.51+

Splunk dotORGANIZATION

0.5+

SplintORGANIZATION

0.49+

waveEVENT

0.47+

GlobalTITLE

0.44+

lastDATE

0.39+

OptimusTITLE

0.37+

Rod Hampton, Kayanne Blackwell & Cindy Jaudon | IFS World 2019


 

>>Live from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the cube covering ifs world conference 2019 brought to you by ifs. >>Well going back to Boston and everybody, this is the cube, the leader in live tech coverage. We're here day one at the ifs world conference at the Hynes convention center in Boston. Cindy shutdown is here. She's the president of America's at ifs and she's joined by to my right, K in Blackwell, who's a controller at PPC partners, one of the divisions of PPC Metro power. And rod is the CIO of PPC partners. Welcome folks. Good to see you. I said, let me start with you. So you were on last year in the cube down at Atlanta. You still kind of set some, set some goals, you're a little competitive with your other brethren within then ifs. We love it. You know, we're Americans. Okay. So how's it going in North America? >>Um, well it's, it's growing well. We've had fantastic growth and it's been, you know, a little bit of competition within ifs, but you know, certainly we were very proud. We were named region of the year last year. So we won the coveted cup, which, uh, means, uh, we, uh, we want to keep that cup. So that's some of the, some of the competition that we've got going, right? >>Yeah. Well, of course, most of us based companies, they'll do, they'll start up 79, you know, 90% of their businesses, U S if not 100%, and then they'll slowly go overseas as some of the opposite. Right? >>Very much. I mean, ifs is a European based company. We've been in the, in the U S for quite awhile and, but we've really been investing in our growth and we've had fantastic growth over the last few years. And I think, you know, one of the reasons for that growth is our customer satisfaction in the fact that we really want to listen to our customers. You know, I, um, I, I travel quite a lot as you can imagine. And when I travel, I always try to make sure I can visit customers and hear what they have to say, you know, and of course we love to hear the good things, but I also like to hear when they can give us some ideas for improvement and um, you know, then that gives us something to work on and to, you know, to keep moving forward. Um, I also think that, you know, the good thing about that is, um, it gives us a chance to listen and um, you know, I heard something really great from one of our customers, they went live two weeks ago and they called up and said, Hey, can we do a customer story? I love things like that. Yeah. >>I always love that. Uh, let me think about it. I'll get back to you. Okay. What's your relationship between ifs and PPC part? >>Well, PPC partners is one of our newer customers in there in the middle of an implementation and they're doing some great things around digital transformation. And when I had this opportunity to be here on the cube, I thought it would be great to invite rod and can with me and to, you know, tell some of the things that they're doing. >>Cool. So I kind of recruited Cindy as my cohost, your, they're going to be the defective coho. So welcome to the queue and then we're going to show you right to the fire. Okay. So, uh, can you describe your, your role, your when one of the divisions of PPC partners, right? So maybe maybe set up sort of PPC partners and then your role. >>Right. Okay. So PPC is a specialty contracting company and we have four subsidiary companies that operate in the upper Midwest and then also the Southeastern United States. And we provide, um, um, customers within a base innovative, innovative solutions in the electrical and mechanical contracting. So there are those four companies. I was one of the controllers, um, of those four companies for a lot of years. And now I'm on the core team. There's four of us, five of us now, um, that are involved in the implement. >>Okay. So you got all the numbers in your head. And then rod, you're the CIO and you guys are a service organization for all the divisions. Is that correct? That is correct. >>We sit at the holding company and we're responsible for technology across all four of those specialty contractor companies that can just mention. >>So I love these segments, Cindy, because you know, we, here you go, we go to a lot of conferences in the cube and um, you hear a lot about digital transformation, but, so I'd like to ask the practitioners, what does that mean for you guys? We've got somebody who's very close to the line of business, like I say, knows the numbers, but at the end of the day you've got to deliver the technology services. So what does digital transformation mean to you? What's the company doing in that regard? So a great question actually. >>Um, you'll find companies like ours that have been on the same platform for quite a while, uh, 50 plus years, uh, five zero five, six, zero, uh, probably North of five zero, but we'll go with five zero. Uh, and what happens over time is just, you know, with the system can't grow with the organizations, you resort to a lot of manual paper pushing a lot of file flinging, lots of Excel. And so there's just a ton of duplication of effort and those types of things going on. So from a technology standpoint, that's really the stuff that I come in and see and go, you know. Um, but overall I think that getting to the ifs platform, getting a lot of those redundant processes, a lot of the file flinging out of there, it's just going to be beneficial for all of them. >>Okay. So you guys have had to make the business, you're in the middle of the implementation, right? Is that correct? So she had to go through the business case. Um, it sounds like the business case was, you know, we're, we're basically struggling with running our business because, you know, data's all over the place. We don't have a single view of our business, our customers, et cetera. So we have to come to grips with that. But, but, so what was the business case like? I presume that you were involved as well. >>Right. So I've was really involved in building the software that we've used for that 40 plus years though I haven't used it all of them two years. Um, and, and it was really. It was built by accountants. We, you know, intended for it to meet the needs of the whole, the whole organization. But really it was built by accountants. So, um, we've found that we just really weren't able to keep up with meeting the needs of all of the users. Um, so when we started looking at that, we also had, we were running on a couple of different, um, I'm going to call them boxes. We run it on IBM. So, um, we were not able to look across the entire organization and see a consolidated view of the whole organization. So that was one of the things that we were looking to do, was to really bring all four companies under one umbrella and be able to get a picture of the whole mainframe or, yes, we had a couple of mainframes and all of that software was internally written. Um, and it was good. It was, it was good, but it met, you know, just the needs that those of us within the company saw. Um, so I think we were missing a whole lot of opportunity, um, to really, you know, see what else was out there and see new things and really get outside of our sphere of understanding, you know, >>so PPC, >>no, I was going to say as SKM pointed out and the sort of running joke within the companies is the system we have today does numbers really well. Words not so much because it was designed by accountants for accounting, tracking the financials primarily. Yeah. >>In PPC you do construction of course, or construction club, but you also do some service as well, right? You've got people out in the field that are, that are doing, doing service. So when you were looking, um, I'm assuming that you were trying to find a system that could do both, both solutions. Yeah. Did. >>Absolutely. Uh, one of the things that's been concerning to the entire core team is it's great to go out and find a system and there's plenty of them that can handle your back office. Most systems do that fairly well. But what about you feel services, uh, any in our particular industry, electrical contracting, you might have residential, you know, we could very well be working on the buck stadium or a military installation or even the school, you know, those folks have to be able to process invoices, do all sorts of things from a handheld, et cetera, et cetera. That was a big, big driving factor for us. So has a lot of COBOL code running? Is that, is there right here? So you said 50 years, I mean, um, so now I'm interested in the, in the, in the migration and, and you know what that looks like. >>Yeah, I'll bet. So do you, do you have to freeze the existing sort of systems and then sort of bring the other ones up to speed? Is this cloud-based? What does that all look like? That great question. So, uh, we are, uh, we subscribe to the managed cloud solution. Um, you know, for most construction companies, electrical contracting companies like ours, you know, technology is important, but it is not what really makes our wheels turn. It's a con. It's a competitive advantage if you use it wisely. And so, um, you know, for us it was very important to think about this holistically and try to figure out if we're gonna bring in a solution, what does that solution need to look like and will it work for all of our companies, not just one, not just residential, commercial, et cetera. Okay. All right. So, so w w what's that journey look like? I mean, um, when did, when did it start? What's your >>sort of timeline? So about two and a half years ago, we really started looking at what we had in on hand now and what we had in place and thinking about did we really want to make a move? And so, um, we had a team that came together about 15 people across the organization from operations and also the back office to really evaluate what we had evaluated our needs. Um, we decided, yes, we needed something new. And then we actually brought in a second team, um, that started looking at what that new thing would be. We had a consultant assisting us with that and uh, we kinda narrowed it down to two players if you will. And ifs was one of those. Um, and we, even though, um, one of the things that we liked was the fact that that ifs had, um, a broad reach over different types of industries and we felt like that would give us, um, something in addition to a construct and centric view know domain expertise. Yeah, >>exactly. You know, and you know, with our core industries, you know, construction is a big part of that. But one of the things that we're seeing in the construction industry today is the trend to go to what we call prefabrication. The fact that you know, you can really speed up a project if you aren't trying to build everything on site and you can also do it much more cheaper. McKinsey has a study out and they believe that over time if, if of comp of construction company will engage with prefabrication, they can reduce the project timelines 20 to 50% and lower the cost up to 20% and with ifs is heritage in manufacturing. It's really a perfect marriage for construction companies because construction companies need the project management, the installation, you know, the change management that goes along with some of those back-office things. They also a lot of time have to do service. But if you really want to get that competitive advantage, if you can take advantage of the prefab, which is really manufacturing high, if this is heritage, he could really have a, a full, complete S, you know, solution from one supplier. >>There's a huge trend in home-building actually. You would, you see, you know, modular homes and kind of the future of it. But uh, so how does that affect you guys? I mean you, you prefab something that resonates with you, is that sort of more of a generic statement across the customer base or >>it's certainly an area where we're focusing on more. Um, we also have an automation, uh, division that really focuses on, um, automation for industries. And that's an area that it's kind of a manufacturing type of thing. They build panels and those sorts of things. So we're definitely seeing it >>well. So, okay. So I got to ask you, so when you pulled out the Gartner magic quadrant, I said, okay, it always is. Ifs isn't the leader that, that, that, that might've helped. Right. Okay. So you don't get fired now, but choose the leader, but then you started peeling the onion. He had to do due diligence. So what kinds of things did you look at? What kind of tires did you kick? Piers, did you talk to and be, I'm interested in what your, what you learned. Well, I'll touch on one key element and >>we can get in as many sub elements as you like. The selection process for us took several months. Um, I think initially we really pared it down to about eight packages that we were seriously considering. Then down to four and then eventually down to two. And what really, really intrigued us about ifs was the fact that they are not construction centric. So we really had a big decision to make internally, which was do we want to just get on the bandwagon and do what everyone else in construction is doing or do we really wanna you know, risk versus reward and go after something special. So ifs, they are in, you name it, manufacturing is obviously key. Aerospace engineering, race cars I saw today, I didn't know that. So that was a big selling point for us. And the plan is to retire your mainframe and go into the cloud. >>Yes, yes, yes. So IBM got you in a headlock. >>We've been friends for a long time. Good company. Um, w what's that been like just to sort of, uh, that the thought of, you know, going to the cloud. W how, how is, you know, the it folks you know, responded to that. Um, how has that changed their sort of role brokers versus all? Again, I think in construction organizations, technology is important, but it is not what makes the wheels turn. So I'm trying to bring in all of that iron and infrastructure and build it out and configure it ourselves and then maintain it for the long haul. Just not something that was value added for us. In addition, um, if you've ever worked with Oracle, which is a close partner of ifs, but there is a lot of licensing caveats and a lot of things you've got to worry about if you're going to go it alone by going with the managed cloud solution, we're sort of partnering and trusting ifs to take that on for us so we can focus on taking care of our companies, our customers, and doing what we do best. Right? So, okay, so you're still going to be an Oracle. You just won't be, it won't be as visible. We use Oracle too. We're a Salesforce customer, so Hey, Oracle is behind there, but no offense. >>Ah, I know you guys did >>for the distinction as well, right? Because even if you are going to have portions of Oracle that are running your system, you've got to have some Oracle experts on staff. You know, if you're going to have all of the infrastructure, you gotta have infrastructure folks who understand how it all ties together. So on the surface it could seem like a simple decision to do it in house or go to the cloud. Far from it. >>Yeah. You know, I think certainly one of the things that we see in a lot of different industries, but certainly in construction, the plant had always been that you bring together different, different solutions and you try to both and together and then some of that becomes a lot more concerning. You know, some of the technology behind it. But one of the things that with the ifs solution is the fact that from one provider you can do, you know, do the whole life cycle. So then some of the have it in the managed cloud where we take care of it for you. So then that takes away some of those technology issues and then you can focus on your core competencies. So Rhonda would agree generally >>with what you're saying. I mean some probably say that for most companies that you know, the technology is not the core differentiator. Obviously this for Google, sure. For Amazon, for Facebook, but for CIO is I talked to, they go people process, technology, technology is the least of my problems. It's like I was going to come and go, it's going to change. I can deal with that. It's the, if the people in the process issues. So having said that, I'm still interested in how concerned you were about peeling the onion on the cloud, what's behind it, the security model, all that stuff in terms of your due diligence, you know, with any cloud based solution, there's some concern obviously. But, but in working with ifs, we, we asked a ton of questions and they gave us a ton of answers. So the comfort level was there. Um, the industry's been going to the cloud now for quite some time. And to be brutally honest, if you're not going there, um, you need to be strongly considered >>in Microsoft is our partner with the cloud. We're on, you know, using Microsoft Azure. So it's not like, you know, it's one of the largest cloud provider. So it's not like, you know, it's, it's something that you have to worry about. You've got the, you know, the backstop of Microsoft behind you as well. You know, I'm sorry, go, go, go. I was going to say, I think one of the things that's interesting is you talk about all your different divisions and you're really trying to bring a lot of different companies together on one system. And one of the things that I, you know, as I've seen the things that's change management becomes really something that you really have to consider. I mean, how have you seen that part of the implementation going? Has there been stepping in the easy piece for you? It's not been an easy piece and that's one of the pieces that we're still working on. >>Um, I don't know if any organization that says that they're really, really good at change. Um, but we've recognized that really the, our organization is a group of entrepreneurs and we've encouraged people to have their own business, but we're really trying to streamline and get some consistency across the organization. That's a little bit of a culture shift for us. So that change management piece is a piece that we're really trying to get our arms around now and prepare, um, the organization for that team. Just trying to get my head around your software still. You guys do change management? I TSM. Well, you'll change management is really some of the, um, consulting that goes along with it and certainly ifs and AR, we've got many partners who can, you know, help our customers go through that. Because when you're going through a digital transformation, you know, you're taking people who have been using something for 50 years, being out, especially out in the field doing those things. And now you're trying to figure out what are the right processes to put in place to get what the business needs. And in some cases they might have to do things differently. So you really have to think that through and how you're going to roll those out. >>So now, is this your first ifs world? Yes, it is. It is. What final thoughts, you know, things you've, you've taken away or you're going to bring back to your teams? >>Well, yeah, Boston is a favorite city of mine. I was just glad to be here just for that. But, and we've just been here a little bit. I've already picked up some things on leadership. I was involved the um, >>Oh, the women's leadership breakfast this morning. So there's already been some things that I think we can take back to users and share with them, particularly around change management and trying to get people comfortable and understanding why they're uncomfortable with change. You know? So it, rod, you're next on the line. So I'm sure you were taking notes, pretty attentive in the sessions and just getting started, right? >>No, you know, I have, and one of the things for me that was most, I guess rewarding is, is the partner network. All of the vendors. There's a number of things with our implementation that we're still trying to sort out OCR for example, being one of them. Are we going to go there or are we gonna wait until later? Just different technologies and maybe add ons that we may want to take advantage of. All you've got to do is walk down the hallways and there's, there's people ready to talk to you about it. So that's, that's been kind of intriguing. >>Okay. Excellent. Well yeah, I said earlier I was, I was surprised and impressed at the sort of size of the ecosystem and its great. Well good luck to you guys. Really wish you the best and thanks so much for coming on the cube and sharing your story Cindy. Great to see you. Always pleasure. All right, take care. Thank you for watching everybody. We're back with our next guest right after this short break. You're watching the cube from Boston ifs world 2019 right back.

Published Date : Oct 8 2019

SUMMARY :

ifs world conference 2019 brought to you by ifs. So you were on last year in the cube down at Atlanta. you know, a little bit of competition within ifs, but you know, certainly we were very proud. U S if not 100%, and then they'll slowly go overseas as some of the opposite. And I think, you know, one of the reasons for that growth is our customer satisfaction I'll get back to you. I thought it would be great to invite rod and can with me and to, you know, So welcome to the queue and then we're going to show you right to the fire. And now I'm on the core team. you guys are a service organization for all the divisions. We sit at the holding company and we're responsible for technology across all four of those specialty So I love these segments, Cindy, because you know, we, here you go, we go to a lot of conferences in the and what happens over time is just, you know, with the system can't grow with the organizations, our business because, you know, data's all over the place. but it met, you know, just the needs that those of us within the company saw. Words not so much because it was designed by So when you were looking, um, you know, those folks have to be able to process invoices, do all sorts of things from a handheld, And so, um, you know, for us it was very important to us with that and uh, we kinda narrowed it down to two players if you will. project management, the installation, you know, the change management that goes along with some of those back-office You would, you see, you know, modular homes and kind of the future of So we're definitely seeing it So what kinds of things did you look at? on the bandwagon and do what everyone else in construction is doing or do we really wanna you know, So IBM got you in a headlock. that been like just to sort of, uh, that the thought of, you know, going to the cloud. Because even if you are going to have portions of Oracle that are running your system, but certainly in construction, the plant had always been that you bring together different, I mean some probably say that for most companies that you know, the technology is not the core differentiator. And one of the things that I, you know, as I've seen the things that's change management becomes really something So you really have to think that through and how you're going to roll those out. What final thoughts, you know, things you've, you've taken away or you're going to bring back to your teams? I was involved the um, So I'm sure you were taking notes, pretty attentive in the sessions and just getting started, No, you know, I have, and one of the things for me that was most, I guess rewarding is, Well good luck to you guys.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

Rod HamptonPERSON

0.99+

50 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

Cindy JaudonPERSON

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

two playersQUANTITY

0.99+

90%QUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

four companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

CindyPERSON

0.99+

RhondaPERSON

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

50 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

AtlantaLOCATION

0.99+

40 plus yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

North AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

Southeastern United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

four companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

one systemQUANTITY

0.99+

Kayanne BlackwellPERSON

0.99+

second teamQUANTITY

0.99+

Boston, MassachusettsLOCATION

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

two weeks agoDATE

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

one key elementQUANTITY

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.98+

KPERSON

0.98+

79QUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

both solutionsQUANTITY

0.98+

50 plus yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

SalesforceORGANIZATION

0.97+

one providerQUANTITY

0.97+

singleQUANTITY

0.97+

ExcelTITLE

0.97+

up to 20%QUANTITY

0.97+

Hynes convention centerLOCATION

0.97+

PPCORGANIZATION

0.96+

twoQUANTITY

0.96+

BlackwellLOCATION

0.95+

about 15 peopleQUANTITY

0.95+

about two and a half years agoDATE

0.95+

SKMORGANIZATION

0.93+

2019DATE

0.93+

rodPERSON

0.91+

Phil Finucane, Express Scripts | Mayfield People First Network


 

>> Narrator: From Sand Hill Road, in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE, presenting the People First Network, insights from entrepreneurs and tech leaders. >> Hello and welcome to a special Cube conversation, I'm John Furrier with theCUBE. We're here at Mayfield Fund on Sand Hill Road, Venture Cap for investing here for the People First co-created production by theCube and Mayfield. Next to us, Phil Finucane who's the former CTO of Express Scripts as well as a variety of other roles. Went to Stanford, Stanford alum. >> Mm hmm. >> Good to see you, thanks for joining me for this interview. >> Thank you, thank you for having me. >> So, before we get into some of the specifics, talk about your career, you're a former CTO of Express Scripts >> Yep. >> What are some of the other journeys that you've had? Talk about your roles. >> Yeah, I've had sort of a varied career. I started off as just a computer coder for a contract coder in the mid-90s. I sort of stumbled into it, not because I had a computer science background, but because when you start coding, sort of for fun in Silicon Valley in the mid-90s, there are just lots of jobs and I was lucky to have great mentors along the way. In 2003, I joined Yahoo and came in as the lead engineer, sort of the ops guy and the build and release guy for the log in and registration team at Yahoo, so I learned how to, went from being just a coder to being somebody who know how to run and build big systems and manage them all around the world. That was in the day when everything was bare metal and I could go to a data center and actually look at my machine and say, "Wow, that one's mine," right? And you know, sort of progressed from there to being the architect by the time that I left for some of the big social initiatives at Yahoo. On my way out, the YOS, the initiative to try to build Facebook in I think 2007, 2008 to try to take them on. That didn't work out too well, but it was definitely a formative experience in my career. From there I went to Zynga, where I was the CTO for Farmville. Was really, really good at getting middle-aged women in the Midwest to come play our game, and you know, was there for >> And it was highly, >> About three years >> high growth, Farmville >> Huge growth >> Took off like a rocket ship. >> Yeah, you know, over the 10 quarters I worked on the game we had over a billion dollars in revenue and that was, you know, the Zynga IPO'd on the back of that, right? And we weren't the only game, but we were certainly >> That was one of the big games >> The big whale, us and poker were the two that really drove the value in Zynga at that point. After that, I went to American Express, where I worked in a division that sort of sat off on the side of American Express focusing on stored value products. I was the chief architect for that division. Stored value products and international currency exchange. So, you know, at one point, I was in charge of both a pre-paid platform and American Express's traveler's checks platform, believe it or not, a thing that still exists. Although it's not heavily used any more. And you know, finally, I went to Express Scripts, where I spent the last three years as the CTO for that org. >> It's interesting, you've got a very unique background, because you know, you've seen the web scale, talk about bare metal Yahoo days, I mean, I remember those days vividly, you know, dealing with database schemas, I mean certainly the scale of Yahoo front page, never mind the different services that they had, which by the way, silo-like, they had databases >> Very, oh totally >> So building a registration and identity system must've been like, really stitching together a core part of Yahoo, I mean, what a Herculean task that must've been. >> Yeah, it was a lot of fun. I learned a lot, you know, we, it was my first experience in figuring out how to deal with security around the web. You know, we had, at the beginning, some vulnerabilities here and there, as time went on, our standards around interacting around the web got better and better. Obviously, Yahoo has run into trouble around that in subsequent years, but it was definitely a big learning experience, being involved in you know, the development of the OAuth 2.0 spec and all of that, I was sort of sitting there advising the folks who were, you know, in the middle of that, doing all the work. >> And that became such a standard as we know, tokens, dealing with tokens and SAS. Really drove a lot of the SAS mobile generation that did cloud, which becomes kind of that next generation so you had, you know Web 1.0, Web 2.0, then you had the cloud era, cloud 2.0, now they're goin' DevOps and apps. I want to get your thought, and you throw crypto in there just for fun, of dealing with blockchain and then token economics and new kinds of paradigms are coming online >> It's amazing how far we've come in those years, right? I mean I look at the database that was built inside of Yahoo and this predated me, you know, this was back to circa 1996, I think, but you know, big massively scalable databases that were needed just because the traditional relational database just wouldn't work at that scale, and Yahoo was one of the first to sort of discover that. And now you look at the database technologies that are out there today that take some of those core concepts and just extend them so much further and they're so much easier to access, to use, to run, operate, all of those things than back in the days of Yahoozle, UDB, and it's amazing just to see how far we've come. >> Phil, I want to get your thoughts, because you know, talking about Yahoo and just your experiences and even today, at that time it was like changing the airplane's engine at 35,000 feet, it's really difficult. A lot of corporate enterprises right nhow are having that same kind of feeling with digital, and digital transformation, I'd say it's a cliche, but it is true this impact, the role of data that's playing and the just for value creation but also cybersecurity could put a company out of business, so there's all kinds of looming things that are opportunities and challenges, that are sizable, huge tasks that was once regulated to the full stack developers and the full web scalers, now the lonely CIO with the anemic enterprise staff has to turn around on a dime. Staff up, build a stack, build commodity, scale out, this is pretty massive, and not a lot of people are talking about this. What's your view on this? Because this is super important. >> Yeah it is, and you know, so I had kind of a shock, moving from working my whole career here on Silicon Valley and then going to American Express, which you know, is very similar in a lot of ways to Express Scripts, and the sort of corporate mindset around, "What is technology?" There is this notion that everything is IT and here in the valley, IT is you know, internal networks and laptops and those sorts of things, the stuff that's required to make your enterprise run internally. Their IT is all of your infrastructure, right? And IT is a service organization, it's not the competitive advantage in your industry, right? And so both of the places that I've gone have had really forward-thinking leaders that have wanted to change the way that their enterprise operates around technology, and move away from IT but, to technology, to thinking about engineering as a core competency. And that's a huge change, not only for the CIO >> You're saying they did have that vision >> They had the vision, but they didn't know how to get there, so my charter coming in and you know, others who were on the teams around me, our charter was to come in and help build a real engineering organization as opposed to an IT org that's very vendor-oriented, you know, that's dependent on third parties to tell you the right thing or the wrong thing, you know that hires consultants to come in and help set up architecture standards, because we couldn't do that on our own, we're not the experts on this side. You know, that's sort of the mindset in many old school companies, right? That needs, that I think needs to change. This notion that software is eating the world is still not something that people have gotten their heads around in many companies, right? >> And data's washing out old business models, so if software's eating the world, data's the tsunami that's coming in and going to take out the beach and the people there. >> Right. And so it's like, all of these things, it's one thing for, you know, a forward-thinking CEO like Tim Wentworth at Express Scripts, who was responsible for bringing me and the group in, you know, those kinds of folks, it's one thing to know that you have to make that transition it's another thing to have a sense of what that means for an engineering team, and all the more for the rest of the organization to be able to get behind it. I mean, people you know, I don't know any number of business partners who've been used to, just sort of taking a spec, throwing it over the wall, and saying, "Come back to me in two years when you're done." That's not how effective organizations work around technology. >> Let's drill into that, because one of the things that's cultural, I mean I do some of the interviews of theCUBE, I talk to leaders all the time like yourself, the theme keeps coming back, it's culture, it's process, technology, all those things you talk about, but culture is the number one issue people point to, saying, "That's the reason why "something did or didn't happen." >> Correct. >> So, you talk about throwing it over the fence, that's waterfall, so you think about the old waterfall methodology, agile, well documented, but the mindset of product thinking is a really novel concept to corporate America Not to Silicon Valley, and entrepreneurs, they got to launch a product, not roll out SAP over two years, right, or something they used to be doing. So that's a cultural mindset shift. >> It's difficult for folks, even if they want to get on board to come along some of the time. One of the real big successes we had early on at Express Scripts was, you know, transitioning our teams to Agile wasn't difficult, what was difficult was getting business partners to sort of come along and be actively engaged in that product development mindset and lifecycle and all those sorts of things. And you know, we had one partner in particular, we were migrating from a really old, really clunky customer care application that you know had taken years and years to build, took on average, a new agent took six weeks to get trained on it because it was so complex and it's Oracle Forms and you know, every field in the database was a field on this thing, and there were green screens to do the stuff that you couldn't do in Oracle Forms, so and we wanted to rebuild the application. We tried to get them to come along and say, "Okay, we're going to do it in really small chunks," but business partners were like, "No, we can't afford "to have our agents swiveling between two applications." And so finally after we got our first sort of full-feature complete, we begged to go into a call center, you know with our business partners, and sit down with a few agents and just have them use it and see if it looked like it worked, if it did the right thing, and it was amazing seeing the business partner go, over the course of an hour, from "I can't be engaged in this, "I don't want an agent swiveling, "I don't want to be, you know, delivering partial applications "I want the whole thing." to, "Oh my god, it works way better, "the design is much nicer, the agents seem to like it," you know, "Here are the next things we should work on, "These are the things we got wrong." They immediately pivoted, and it wasn't, it was because they're the experts, they know how to run their business, they know what's important in their call centers, they know what their agents need, and they had just never seen the movie before, they just had no concept you could work that way. >> So this is actually interesting, 'cause what you're saying is, a new thing, foreign to the business partners, the tech team's on board, being Agile, building product, they have to, they can't just hear the feature benefits, they got to feel it. >> Yeah, they have to see it >> This seems to be the experience of success before they can move. Is that a success you think culturally, something that people have to be mindful of? >> It's absolutely something you have to be mindful of. And that was just the first step down the path. I mean, that team made a number of mistakes that folks here I think in the valley wouldn't normally make, you know. Over-committing and getting themselves into deep water by trying to get too much done and actually getting less accomplished in the process because of it and you know, the engagement around using data to actually figure out what's the next feature that we build. When you've got this enormous application to migrate, you should probably have some insight as to you know, feature by feature, what are you going to work on next? And that was a real challenge, 'cause there's a culture of expertise-driven, you know being subject-matter driven, expertise driven as opposed to being data driven about how do you >> Let's talk about data-driven. We had an interview earlier this morning with another luminary here at the Mayfield 50th conference celebration that they're having, and he said, "Data is the new feedback mechanism." and his point was, is that if you treat the Agile as an R&D exercise from a data standpoint. Not from a product but get it out there, get the data circulating in, it's critical in formulation of the next >> It is, yeah, it's absolutely critical. That was the eye opener for me going to Zynga. Zynga had an incredible, probably still does have, an incredible product culture that every single thing gets rolled out behind an experiment. And so you know, that's great from an operational perspective, because it allows you to, you know, move quickly and roll things out in small increments and when it doesn't work, you can just shut it off but it's not some huge catastrophe. But it's also critical because it allows you to see what's working and what's not and the flip side of that is, some humility of the people developing the products that their ideas are not going to work sometimes just because you know this domain well doesn't mean that you're necessarily going to be the expert on exactly how everything is going to play out. And so you have to have this ability to go out, try stuff, let it fail, use that, hopefully you fail quickly, you learn what's not working and use that to inform what's the next step down the path that you take, right? And Agile plays into it, but that's for me, that's the big transition that corporations really have to struggle with, and it's hard. >> You know you're, been there done that, seen multiple waves of innovation, want to bring up something to kind of get you going here. You see this classically in the old school 90s, 80s day. Product management, product people and sales people. They're always buttin' heads, you know? Product marketing, marketing people want this sales and marketing want this, product people buttin' heads, but now with Agile, the engineering focus has been the front lines. People are building engineering teams in house. They're building custom stacks for whatever reasons, the apps are getting smarter. The engineers are getting closer to the edge, the customer if you will. How do you help companies, or how do you advise companies to think about the relationship between a product-centric culture and a sales-centric culture? Because sometimes you have companies that are all about the customer-centric, customer-centric customer-centric, product-centric and sometimes if you try to put 'em together there's always going to be an alpha-beta kind of thing there and that's the balance in this. What's your take on this? Seems to be a cutting edge topic >> Yeah, well, so you know, one of the last big initiatives that I worked on at Express Scripts. Express Scripts has the, to my knowledge, the largest automated home delivery pharmacy in the world. It's amazing if you walk into one of our pharmacies where automation is packaging and filling prescriptions and packaging and shipping and doing all of that stuff. And we've built so much efficiency into the process that we've started getting slack in the system. Every year, you're trying to figure out how to make something work better and you know, have better automation around it. And so, you know, what do you do with all of that slack? The sales team can't sign up enough new customers for Express Scripts to actually fill that capacity. And so they create a division of commoditizing this, basically white labeling your pharmacy. We called it Pharmacy as a Platform, exposing APIs to third parties who might want to come along and hey, Phil's pharmacy can now fill branded prescriptions to get sent to you in your home, right? And so that's a fantastic vision, but there's a real struggle between engineering who had all these legacy stacks that we needed to figure out how to move to be able to really live up to this, you know the core of Express Scripts was our members and not somebody else's members. And so there's a lot of rewiring at the core that needs to be done. An operations team, a product team that's, you know, running these home delivery pharmacies, and a sales team that wants to go off and sell all over the place, right? And so, you know, early on, we started off and the sales team tried to sell, like six different deals that all required different parts of the vision, but you know, they weren't really, there was no real roadmap to figure out how do you get from where we're at to the end, and we could've done any of those things, but trying to do them all at once was going to be a trainwreck. And so, you know, we stubbed our toes a couple of times along the way, but I think it just came down to having a conversation and trying to be as transparent as possible on all sides, in all sides. To you know, try to get to a place where we could be effective in delivering on the vision. The vision was right. Everybody was doing all of the right things. But if you haven't actually, with so much of this stuff, if you haven't seen the movie, if you haven't worked this way before, there's nothing I can tell you that's going to make it work magically for you tomorrow. You have to just get this together and work in small increments to figure out how to get there. >> You got to go through spring training, you got to do the reps. >> Yep, absolutely. >> All right, so on your career, as you look at what you've done in your career, and what people outside are looking at right now, you got startups trying to compete and get a market position. You have other existing suppliers who could be the old guard, retooling and replatforming, refactoring, whatever the buzz word you want to use. And then the ultimate customer who wants to consume and have the ability of having custom personalization, data analytics, unlimited elastic capability with resources for their solution. How, what advice would you give to the startup, to the supplier, and to the customer to survive this next transition of cloud 2.0, you know and data tsunami, and all the opportunities that are coming? Because if they don't, they'll be challenged a startup goes out of business, a supplier gets displaced. >> Right, I mean, well, so the startup, I don't know if I have good advice for the startup. Startups in general have to find a market that actually works for them. And so, you know, I don't know that I've got some secret key that allows startups to be effective other than don't run out of money, try to figure out how to build effectively to get you to the point where you're, you know, where you're going to win. One of my earliest, one of the earliest jobs I had in my career, I came into a startup, and I tried, one of the founders had written the initial version of the code base. I, as a headstrong engineer, was convinced that he had done horrible work, and so I sort of holed up for like, six to eight weeks doing a hundred hours a week trying to rewrite the entire code base while getting nothing done for the startup. You know, in the end, that was the one job I've ever been fired from, and I should've been fired, because, you know, honestly as a startup, you shouldn't worry about perfection from an engineering perspective. You should figure out how to try to find your marketplace. Everybody has tech debt, you can fix that as time goes on, the startup needs to figure out how to be viable more than anything else. As far as suppliers go, you know, I don't know it's interesting the, you know, I sort of look at corporate America and there are many many companies that really rely heavily on their vendors to tell them how to do things. They don't trust in their own internal engineering ability. And then there are the ones, like the teams I have built at AmEx and Express Scripts that really do want to learn it all and be independent. I would say, identify when you walk into somebody's shop which they are and sell to them appropriately. You know, I've been a Splunk customer for a long time, I love Splunk. But the Splunk sales team early on at Express Scripts tried to come in and sell me on a whole bunch of stuff that Splunk was just not good at, right? >> And you knew that. >> And I knew that, because I've been a hands-on customer every since Zynga, right? I know what it's good at, and I love it as a tool, but you know, it's not the Swiss Army knife. It can't do everything. >> Well now you got Signal FX, so now you can get the observability you need. >> Exactly, right? So yeah, I, you know, I would say, you know, for those kinds of companies, it's important to go in and understand what your customer is, you know, what your customer is asking for and respond to them appropriately. And in some cases, they're going to need your expertise, either because they're building towards it or they haven't gotten there yet, and some cases, one of the things that I have done with teams of mine in the past, was it with AppDynamics at Express Scripts, excuse me at AmEx, five or six years ago, they were sold on, you know, bringing in AppDynamics as a monitoring tool, I actually made them not bring it in, because they didn't know what they didn't know. I made them go build some basic monitoring, you know, using some open source tools, just to get some background, and then, you know, once they did, we ended up bringing AppDynamics in, but doing it in a way that they were accretive to what we were trying to accomplish and not just this thing that was going to solve all of our problems. >> And so that brings up the whole off-the-shelf general purpose software model that you were referring to. The old model was lean on your vendors. They're supplying you, and because you don't have the staff to do it yourself. That's changing, do you think that's changing? >> It is, it's changing, but again, I think there's a lot of places where people nominally want to go there, but don't know how to get there, and so, you know, people are stubbing their toes left and right. If you're doing it with this mindset of, we're constantly getting better and we're learning and it's okay to make mistakes as long as we move forward, >> It's okay to stub your toe as long as you don't cut an artery open. >> Yeah, that's true, yeah exactly >> You don't want to bleed out, that's a cybersecurity hack >> That's true, that's true. But for me a lot of the time that just comes down to how long are you waiting before you stub your toe? If you're, you know, if you wait two years before you actually try to launch something, the odds of you cutting your leg off are much higher than >> Well I want to get into the failure thing, so I think stubbing your toe brings up this notion of risk management, learning what to try, what not to do, take experiments to try to your, which is a great example. Before you get there, you mentioned suppliers. One of the things we hear and I want to get your thoughts on, is that, a lot of CIOs and C-sos, and CBOs, or whatever title is the acronym, they're trying to reduce the number of suppliers. They don't want more tools, right? They don't necessarily want another tool for the tool's sake or they might want to replatform, what does that even mean? So, we're hearing in our interviews and our discussions with partitioners, "Hey, I want to get my suppliers down, "and by the way, I want to be API driven, "so I want to start getting to a mode "where I'm dictating the relationship to suppliers." How do you respond to that? Do you see that as aspirational, real dynamic, or fiction? >> It's a good goal to give motivation, I believe it. For me, I approach the problem a little differently. I'm a big believer, well, so, because I've seen this pattern of this next tool is going to be the one that consolidates three things and it's going to be the right answer and instead of eliminating three and getting down to one, you have four, because you're, you need to unwire this new thing, there's a lot of time and effort required to get rid of, you know, your old technology stack, and move to the new one, right? I've seen that especially coming from the C-Sec for Express Scripts is an amazing guy, and you know, was definitely trying to head down that path but we stubbed our toes, we ran into problems in trying to figure out, you know, how do you move from one set of networking gear to the next set? How do you deal with, you know, all of the virus protection and all the other, there's a huge variety of tools. >> So it's not just technical debt, it's disruption >> It's disruption to the existing stack, and you've got to move from old to new, so my philosophy has always been, with technical debt, when you're in debt, and I think technical debt really does operate in a lot of ways like real debt, right? Probably good to have some of it. If you're completely debt-free, that's I've never been in that place before. >> You're comfortable. You might not be moving, >> Exactly, right? But with that technical debt, you know, there's two ways to pay down your debt. You can scrimp and save and put more money into debt principal payments as opposed to spending on other new things, or, well and/or, build productive capacity. So a huge focus for me for the engineering teams that we've built, and this is not anything new to the folks in this area, but, you know, always think about an arms race, where you're getting 1% better every day. The aggregation of marginal gains and investing in internal improvements so that your team is doubling productivity every year, which is something that's really possible for, you know, some of these engineering organizations, is the way that you deal with that, right? If you get to the point where your team is really, really productive, they can go through and eliminate all the old legacy technology. >> That's actually great advice, and it's interesting, because a lot of people just get hung up on one thing. Operating something, and then growing something, and you can have different management styles and different techniques for both, the growth team, the operating team. You're kind of bringing in and saying, we can do both. Operate with growth in mind, to 1% better approach. >> Right, you know, and for me, it's been an interesting journey, you know. I started off as the engineer and then the architect, who was always focused on just the technology, the design of the system in production. Sort of learned from there that you had to be good at the you know, all the systems that get code from a developer's desktop into production, that's a whole interrelated system that's not isolated from your production system. And then from there, it has to be the engineering team that you build has to be effective as well. And so, I've moved from being very technology-centric to somebody who says, "Okay, I have to start "with getting the team right "and getting the culture right if we're ever going to "be able to get the technology to a good place." Mind you, I still love the technology. I'm still an architect at my core, but I've come to this realization that good technology and bad teams will get crushed by bad technologies and good teams. Because now I've seen that a couple of places, where you have old but evolving technology stacks that have gone from low availability and poor performance and low ability to get new features into production to a place where you're fixing all of that at a high rate. It starts with the team. >> You're bringing us some core Silicon Valley ethos to the IT conversation, because what you're talking about is "I'll fund an A team with a B plan any day "over a B team with an A plan." >> Right. >> And where this makes sense, I think is true, is that to your point about debt, A teams know how to manage it. >> Yeah. >> So this is kind of what you're getting at here. >> Right. >> You can take that same ethos, so it's the Agile enterprise. >> Yeah, it is >> That's what we're talking about. Okay, so hypothetical final point I want to chat with you about. Let's just say you and I were startin' a company. We're chief architects, you're the chief architect, I'm a coder, what are we doing? Do I code from horizontally scalable cloud, certainly cloud native, how would you think about building, we have an app in mind, all of our requirements defined, it's going to be data-centric, it's going to be game change and have community, it might have some crypto in there, who knows, but it's going to be fun. How do we scale this out to be really fast? How would you architect this? >> Yeah, well, you know, I do start in the cloud. I go to AWS or Azure or any of the offerings that are out there, and you know, leverage everything that they have that's already wired up already for you. I mean the thing that we've seen in the evolution of software and production systems over the last, well, forever, is you get more and more leverage every day, every year, right? And so, if you and I are startin' a new company, let's go use the tools that are there to do the things that we shouldn't be wasting our time on. Let's focus on the value for our company as much as we can. Don't over-architect. I think premature optimization is a thing that you know, I learned early on is a real problem. You should, you know >> Give an example, what that would look like. >> I've seen >> Database scale decisions done with no scale >> Correct, yeah, you know? You go off >> Let's pick this! It's the most scalable database, well we have no users yet. >> Right, you know you build the super complicated caching architecture or you know, you go design the most critical part of the system out of the gate, you know, using Assembly. You use C++ or, you use a low level language when a high level language with your three users would be just fine, right? You can get the work done in a fraction of the time. >> And get the business logic down, the IP, >> Solve the problem when it becomes a problem. Like, it's, you know, I've, any number of times, I've run into systems, I've built systems where you have some issue that you run into, and you have to go back and redesign some chunk of the system. In my experience, I'm really bad at predicting, and I think engineers are really bad at predicting what are going to be the problem areas until you run into them, so just go as simple as you can out of the gate, you know. Use as many tools as you can to solve problems that, you know, maybe as an engineer, I want to go rebuild every thing from scratch every time. I get the inclination. But it's >> It's a knee-jerk reaction to do that but you stay your course. Don't over-provision, overthink it, thus start taking steps toward the destination, the vision you want to go to, and get better, operate >> Solve the problem you have when it shows up. >> So growth mindset, execute, solve the problems when they're there. >> Right, and initially the problem that you have is finding a market, you know, not building the greatest platform in the world, right? >> Find a market, exactly. >> Right? >> Phil, thanks for taking the time >> Thank you very much, appreciate it. >> Appreciate the insights. Hey, we're here for the People First, Mayfield's 50th celebration, 50 years in business. It's a CUBE co-production, I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching >> Thanks John. (outro music)

Published Date : Sep 11 2019

SUMMARY :

in the heart of Silicon Valley, for the People First co-created production What are some of the other journeys that you've had? to come play our game, and you know, was there for And you know, finally, I went to Express Scripts, what a Herculean task that must've been. advising the folks who were, you know, that next generation so you had, you know Web 1.0, and this predated me, you know, this was back to circa 1996, because you know, talking about Yahoo and here in the valley, IT is you know, to tell you the right thing or the wrong thing, you know and going to take out the beach and the people there. it's one thing to know that you have to make that transition it's process, technology, all those things you talk about, that's waterfall, so you think about and it's Oracle Forms and you know, a new thing, foreign to the business partners, Is that a success you think culturally, as to you know, feature by feature, and his point was, is that if you treat the Agile down the path that you take, right? the customer if you will. different parts of the vision, but you know, you got to do the reps. to survive this next transition of cloud 2.0, you know to get you to the point where you're, you know, but you know, it's not the Swiss Army knife. so now you can get the observability you need. just to get some background, and then, you know, general purpose software model that you were referring to. and it's okay to make mistakes as long as we move forward, as long as you don't cut an artery open. the odds of you cutting your leg off are much higher than "where I'm dictating the relationship to suppliers." to get rid of, you know, your old technology stack, It's disruption to the existing stack, You might not be moving, to the folks in this area, but, you know, and you can have different management styles be good at the you know, all the systems that to the IT conversation, because what you're talking about is is that to your point about debt, so it's the Agile enterprise. I want to chat with you about. and you know, leverage everything that they have It's the most scalable database, or you know, you go design the most critical and you have to go back destination, the vision you want to go to, solve the problems when they're there. Appreciate the insights.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Tim WentworthPERSON

0.99+

Phil FinucanePERSON

0.99+

ZyngaORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

2003DATE

0.99+

AmExORGANIZATION

0.99+

YahooORGANIZATION

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

six weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

American ExpressORGANIZATION

0.99+

2008DATE

0.99+

35,000 feetQUANTITY

0.99+

SplunkORGANIZATION

0.99+

Swiss ArmyORGANIZATION

0.99+

2007DATE

0.99+

MayfieldORGANIZATION

0.99+

PhilPERSON

0.99+

two applicationsQUANTITY

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

three usersQUANTITY

0.99+

People FirstORGANIZATION

0.99+

fiveDATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

1%QUANTITY

0.99+

Express ScriptsORGANIZATION

0.99+

six different dealsQUANTITY

0.99+

one partnerQUANTITY

0.99+

Mayfield FundORGANIZATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

Oracle FormsTITLE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

AppDynamicsORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

two waysQUANTITY

0.99+

first experienceQUANTITY

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

theCubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

mid-90sDATE

0.98+

50 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

tomorrowDATE

0.98+

eight weeksQUANTITY

0.98+

over a billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.97+

one pointQUANTITY

0.97+

six years agoDATE

0.97+

one thingQUANTITY

0.97+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.97+

three thingsQUANTITY

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

CUBEORGANIZATION

0.96+

Michael Bratsch, Franklin Middle School & Leigh Day, Red Hat | Red Hat Summit 2019


 

>> live from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the queue covering your red hat. Some twenty nineteen. You buy bread. >> Oh, good afternoon. And welcome back as the Cube continues our live coverage. Exclusive coverage of Redhead Summit twenty nineteen here in Boston. Some nine thousand strong attendees here. Key notes have been jam packed, but we just finished our afternoon session not too long ago again. Very well attended. Dynamic speakers stew Minimum. John Walls. We're joined now by Lee Dae. Who's the Vice president of Marketing Communications? That Red Hatley. Good to see you. I see you and Michael brats, who was a teacher of English as a second language of Franklin Middle School in Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr B. Good to see you, sir. And that's what your your students call you, Mr B. Is that right? What they do, we saw that way. Might just follow through on that tradition right now. All right, let's talk about why the two of you are here together. And I know you're Michael School has an interesting history that they've been kind of following somewhat independently, you know, in terms of open source and work. And only you found them through your marketing work some really very interesting. Two avenues that you have on your platform. So tell me a little bit about how how you got here. And then we'LL get into it after that. >> Okay, Great. So Red Hat has a program called co lab and this sir program where we go into schools and we teach kids how to code. So we do things like circuit boards and programming on raspberry pies. Kids have program raspberry pies into cameras to go around cities and take pictures. And we have had collapse in many cities, and we hadn't hit the Midwest. And we chose Minneapolis. And we found, fortunately, Franklin Middle School in that great group of girls and two awesome teachers that are very inspirational on, So the relationship didn't stop it. That week of coal lab, we have stayed in touch, and here at the summit, we've showcased the work in the police ship that we have together. Yeah, >> and I know a lot of the focus that the program is toward, uh, appealing to younger ladies. You know, young girls trying to get them or involved in stem education. We just had the two award winners for the women and open source with us just a few moments ago. So this is Ahh, a company wide. Durant wants a directive initiative that you said, Okay, we we have a responsibility, and we think we have a role here to play >> absolutely well. It's important to us to see the next generation of technologists. And when you feel like women, especially young women sometimes feel like technology is inaccessible to them, and they're not often in technology programs and university. So it's our initiative. Teo help young people feel comfortable and good about technology and that they can actually code. And they can actually do things that they didn't think were possible to them previously. >> So, Mr B. Help us understand how this fixing curriculum and give us a little bit of the story of how it went down. >> Well, it's funny asset. I mean, this opportunity for us is a home run out the part because we're a steam school science, technology, engineering, arts in math. So today, not only did our students perform on the main stage a song that we were able to collaborate right and go through a >> whole production process >> with music were also able to on there right now as we speak down running a booth, building circuits, presenting those circuits, presenting those circuit boards, and collaborating altogether down there with attendees of this conference right now. So, I mean, we're covering every one of those steam components, basically, in one project, one large scale technology project. So this opportunity homeland out the >> part. >> I love that because that was the first thing I went to mind. I heard photography involved. You say steam and so much, you know, we can't just have tech for Tex take. You know, I worried I studied engineering and, like, things like design and those kind of things right weren't in the curriculum. But you know what? I went to school. Creative side. Yeah. How important is that? You kind of get especially think young people get the enthusiasm going. That creative side would, you know, get them deeper into it. >> Well, you know, I always look att, individual students. Everybody has their individual gifts and talents, and it's about, you know, finding those leadership skills within each one of those gifts. And so within this, you're able to find someone that might be more creative in one area, maybe more technical and more, you know, logic orientated in other areas. So with that, you're able to just have Mohr a broader spectrum to be ableto find people's individual gives in towns and for them to in the collaboration also contribute their gifts and talents in different avenues instead of it just being one lane like just this part of technology or just this part of production and just this part of design were able to kind of integrate all of that into one thing and to take it one step further. After we did the, um So Cola came out with their mobile container to US Bank Stadium in Minneapolis, Minnesota, and it was right downtown, right outside of where our football team players brand new stadium Super Bowl is is there two years ago now And, um, so with our students being there after we got done with that, that cold lamb, when they were asking us, you know, to take it a step further in the classroom are students actually designed with our future boys Lo Bill Future Girls logo a card and then presented it to Red hat and they ended up printing off the cars and they were able to use it to build the circuit. So we weren't just using the coal lab cars. But we also got to design our own, too. >> So, you know, you said future boy's feet. So that's that's a new organization, the club that you formed the school Future Boys and Girls Club for the express purpose of what? >> Well, so we actually tie in all different content areas into assault. Obviously, this is just the future girls that are here in Boston and did the technology side with us and that parts of Spain the cold because it's an initiative for girls in technology but of the future boys and girls, uh, overall program. We encompass a lot of different continent as we integrate performing arts with academics and all the components of esteem school, um, into learning. And we do interest based learning. We do project based learning, and basically, you know, kids are learning a lot without realizing how much they're really learning, you know, and we make it fun and relevant. But we also teach the leadership skills in the hard work that goes in with it. And I mean, even just coming out here to Boston for this, uh, for this opportunity here in this summit, I mean, the amount of work that it took for the students to get here and the process, the ups and downs, especially with middle school students. You know, the marathon, not a sprint mentality, you know, has been absolutely amazing. >> Good luck with that eye. Well, >> I always say I >> haven't had a bad day yet. Just an overstimulating one. >> So lately, you know, we love having stories on the Cube and especially tech for good is something that we always get a good dose here at Red had some it. You know what else can share some of the open tour stories that were going on around the event? >> We're really thrilled. Today. We're launching our newest open source story, which is about agriculture and which we choose topics with open source stories that are important every everyone so medicine, helping to find cures for cancer, even our government and artificial intelligence. And today it's about open hardware and open agriculture. And we're launching a new film this afternoon. >> It's all future farming, right? Right. That that's the viewing today. >> Yes, and we had someone showing their their farming computer on our stage, and it's actually done in Summit >> Show for today. So you've got the open studio, you know, working and you have a number of projects. I assume this fell into one of those slots right where you were Using one of those platforms to feature great work of future farming is another example of this, But But you have some, I think, pretty neat things that you've created some slots that give you a chance to promote open source in a very practical and very relatable way. >> Yes, exactly. So our Opens our open studio is our internal creative community agency. But we do get ideas from everyone around, you know, around the world. So wait, get ideas about open agriculture, eh? I, uh, what we can do with kids and programming with kids. And then we take those ideas into the open studio and it is a meritocracy. So the best ideas when and that's what we choose to bring to life. And we have designers and writers and filmmakers and strategist and a whole group of people that make up the open studio inside a red hat >> And you've done a new feature, Frank. >> Yes. So, yeah. We work together to create the container that doctor be mentioned and to create the container. And then we work. When >> you have you >> have. You know, one of the girls Taylor actually taught me just now I am not technical. I will just give that caveat. But they they make, they made circuit boards, and they're making circuit boards here. Some issue and mine doesn't work. So don't That's okay. Just, basically were you can see here we have different designs that are attendees can choose from, and then we have electrical tape that you are sorry, competent and an led light. And so the idea is to toe form a circuit and to have led light item the card. That's great. So one of the one of the girls actually taught me how to make it, but I think I didn't follow >> her. Instructed you to go back to school. Wouldn't be the first time that I would have fallen apart either on that. So where Michael, Where would you be now without red hat? Or, you know, you were doing your own thing right independently. But now you've received some unexpected support. Where would you be? You think was out that help. And how much of a difference have they made >> you? Well, let me tell you. I mean, you know, when we look at it being an after school program, the amount of enrichment and opportunities that redhead has created for us has been, honestly, just unbelievable. It's been first class, and we're so appreciative. I mean, even even in our meeting with the future girls last night, we just talked about gratitude and how grateful we are for it. I mean, when you look at this circuit, this is an abbreviated version of what the students actually participate in. This is, you know, just a one one, uh, one led light and a small formation our students were doing. I think there were seven or eight on ours. And so the amount of learning in the modern opportunity that this presented to him not only have they learned how to do the technical piece of it, they've learned howto present. They've learned howto speak and present. They've learned howto call lab, collaborate, work together on huge levels, and I mean, they learned what they can take on an airplane, you know, coming out here. So I mean, the amount of things that through the learning process of, like, eye color, large scale technology project that we've been participating since October since they brought the mobile lab out to Minneapolis. I called a large scale tech, you know, technology project, and going through that whole process has been huge. And let me tell you this as a teacher and those that are parents you're competing was so much in this day and age to keep kids attention, right? I mean, everything is swiped the phone every which way and everything. So instant gratification. So for students to actually engage in this cola program for to be set up so well from Red Hat and to actually stick with it and stay engaged with it really speaks volumes denying the program. But also, you know, our students staying engaged with it, but they've they've stuck with it, they've been engaged, and it's very interest based, the project I've seen it through. But then also the renewed opportunities and being ableto one of the things on our rubric as the teacher is toe expand and extend the learning I don't mean to be long winded, but we wanted, you know, expand on the learning that's already taken place and being out here, it's just it's just a continuous continuation of the learning, you know, not just one level going to next level going on next long light, next level. And that's that, honestly, is where the real learning really takes place. >> So, Michael, you know, from its very nature being an open source company, you know, Red Hat talks a lot about it. Ecosystem in community. If I five red right in the notes, they're you know, your student really getting the value and understanding of community. There's something about they wrote a song. Talk >> about that. We become stronger. Yeah, that's the name of the song is we become stronger And you know what the idea was. We were looking at the power point for this summer and for this summit, and in that there was, uh there was a phrase that said ideas become stronger and that's the collaboration. And so we started tossed around ideas and things like that were like, Well, we liked the idea of stronger, and then we're like, Well, this is more of the coal lab experience, not just the ideas of the technical side. And that's why we become stronger. And yet we developed a song specifically for this summit. I think you go top for, you know. >> Yeah, the performance was amazing. >> Yeah, you don't want >> one top forty, to be honest with you, but no. I mean, uh, you know, and that was another whole another phase, you know, like, I talked about the steam side of the school. Um uh, integrating the arts in and the whole production side of that, you know, it was a lot of work and another project, but it was another area of content that we're able to integrate into this project, and, uh, and we're able to perform it on stage. So, like I said, they literally just got off stage performing. We become stronger singing the whole production of song a dance routine choreography and then went straight to the boot to now present circuits and teach attendees here at the summit howto build a circuit. I don't know how much better can get in that. >> That is so cool. That's great. Now is this the song that you recorded in the same studio. Lenny Kravitz. Atlantis More. Tell me you didn't like that, huh? >> I mean, you know, it's all right. >> That's good. That's great. Congratulations, Roy. On this collaboration, it's really it is exciting to see what they're doing to inspire young people on Michael. I can tell you like your job. Don't you love it? I love it. Yeah, yeah, yeah, absolutely. Well, keep up the great work. And we appreciate the time here. And I look forward to hearing that song. Maybe if it hits, you know, the ice store. You know, Apple Store, maybe, You know, maybe good things will happen, right? Hey, you never know. She's Vice president marketing. We're gonna figure this. I'm checking out. I tio go by weight, become stronger. Thanks, Michael. We appreciate Lee. Thank you for having me back with more. Here on the Cube. You're watching our coverage, right? Had some twenty nineteen, but

Published Date : May 9 2019

SUMMARY :

It's the queue covering of following somewhat independently, you know, in terms of open source and work. And we have had collapse in many cities, and we hadn't hit the Midwest. and I know a lot of the focus that the program is toward, uh, appealing to younger ladies. And when you feel like women, So, Mr B. Help us understand how this fixing curriculum and give us a little bit of the story of not only did our students perform on the main stage a song that we were able to collaborate right So this opportunity homeland out the That creative side would, you know, get them deeper into it. and it's about, you know, finding those leadership skills within each one of those gifts. the club that you formed the school Future Boys and Girls Club for the express purpose of and basically, you know, kids are learning a lot without realizing how much they're really learning, Good luck with that eye. So lately, you know, we love having stories on the Cube and especially tech for good is something that we always And we're launching a new film this afternoon. That that's the viewing today. I assume this fell into one of those slots right where you were Using one you know, around the world. And then we work. And so the idea is to toe Or, you know, you were doing your own thing right it's just it's just a continuous continuation of the learning, you know, not just one level they're you know, your student really getting the value and understanding of community. I think you go top for, you know. integrating the arts in and the whole production side of that, you know, it was a lot of work and another Now is this the song that you recorded in the same Maybe if it hits, you know, the ice store.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
RoyPERSON

0.99+

MichaelPERSON

0.99+

Lenny KravitzPERSON

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

John WallsPERSON

0.99+

MinneapolisLOCATION

0.99+

Lee DaePERSON

0.99+

LeePERSON

0.99+

FrankPERSON

0.99+

Michael BratschPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

US Bank StadiumLOCATION

0.99+

sevenQUANTITY

0.99+

SpainLOCATION

0.99+

Michael bratsPERSON

0.99+

So ColaORGANIZATION

0.99+

eightQUANTITY

0.99+

Franklin Middle SchoolORGANIZATION

0.99+

Boston, MassachusettsLOCATION

0.99+

DurantPERSON

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.99+

OctoberDATE

0.99+

Minneapolis, MinnesotaLOCATION

0.99+

second languageQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

Future Boys and Girls ClubORGANIZATION

0.98+

Apple StoreORGANIZATION

0.98+

RedORGANIZATION

0.98+

Michael SchoolORGANIZATION

0.98+

two award winnersQUANTITY

0.98+

TaylorPERSON

0.98+

two years agoDATE

0.98+

two awesome teachersQUANTITY

0.97+

one thingQUANTITY

0.97+

one projectQUANTITY

0.97+

EnglishOTHER

0.97+

Two avenuesQUANTITY

0.96+

one areaQUANTITY

0.96+

last nightDATE

0.96+

this afternoonDATE

0.95+

first thingQUANTITY

0.95+

Lo Bill Future GirlsORGANIZATION

0.95+

MidwestLOCATION

0.94+

each oneQUANTITY

0.93+

one stepQUANTITY

0.92+

one laneQUANTITY

0.91+

Atlantis MoreTITLE

0.91+

Red HatleyPERSON

0.9+

this summerDATE

0.89+

first timeQUANTITY

0.89+

one levelQUANTITY

0.87+

redORGANIZATION

0.87+

fortyQUANTITY

0.86+

Vice presidentPERSON

0.85+

Franklin Middle School & Leigh DayORGANIZATION

0.85+

first classQUANTITY

0.82+

nine thousand strong attendeesQUANTITY

0.81+

Super BowlEVENT

0.8+

Redhead Summit twenty nineteenEVENT

0.79+

twenty nineteenQUANTITY

0.78+

one largeQUANTITY

0.77+

Red Hat Summit 2019EVENT

0.74+

CubeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.71+

MohrPERSON

0.69+

technology projectQUANTITY

0.67+

few moments agoDATE

0.66+

redheadPERSON

0.65+

stewPERSON

0.65+

thoseQUANTITY

0.57+

TexLOCATION

0.51+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.45+

StrongyByScience Podcast | Bill Schmarzo Part One


 

produced from the cube studios this is strong by science in-depth conversations about science based training sports performance and all things health and wellness here's your host max smart [Music] [Applause] [Music] all right thank you guys tune in today I have the one and only Dean of big data the man the myth the legend bill Schwarz oh also my dad is the CTO of Hitachi van Tara and IOC in analytics he has a very interesting background because he is the well he's known as the Dean of big data but also the king of the court and all things basketball related when it comes to our household and unlike most people in the data world and I want to say most as an umbrella term but a some big bill has an illustrious sports career playing at Coe College the Harvard of the Midwest my alma mater as well but I think having that background of not just being computer science but where you have multiple disciplines involved when it comes to your jazz career you had basketball career you have obviously the career Iran now all that plays a huge role in being able to interpret and take multiple domains and put it into one so thank you for being here dad yeah thanks max that's a great introduction I rep reciate that no it's it's wonderful to have you and for our listeners who are not aware bill is referring him is Bill like my dad but I call my dad the whole time is gonna drive me crazy bill has a mind that thinks not like most so he he sees things he thinks about it not just in terms of the single I guess trajectory that could be taken but the multiple domains that can go so both vertically and horizontally and when we talk about data data is something so commonly brought up in sports so commonly drop in performance and athletic development big data is probably one of the biggest guess catchphrases or hot words or sayings that people have nowadays but doesn't always have a lot of meaning to it because a lot of times we get the word big data and then we don't have action out of big data and bill specialty is not just big data but it's giving action out of big data with that going forward I think a lot of this talk to be talking about how to utilize Big Data how do you guys data in general how to organize it how to put yourself in a situation to get actionable insights and so just to start it off Becky talked a little bit on your background some of the things you've done and how you develop the insights that you have thanks max I have kind of a very nos a deep background but I've been doing data analytics a long time and I was very fortunate one of those you know Forrest Gump moments in life where in the late 1980s I was involved in a project at Procter & Gamble I ran the project where we brought in Walmart's point of sales data for the first time into a what we would now call a data warehouse and for many of this became the launching point of the data warehouse bi marketplace and we can trace the effect the origins of many of the BI players to that project at Procter & Gamble in 87 and 88 and I spent a big chunk of my life just a big believer in business intelligence and data warehousing and trying to amass data together and trying to use that data to report on what's going on and writing insights and I did that for 20 25 years of my life until as you probably remember max I was recruited out Business Objects where I was the vice president of analytic applications I was recruited out of there by Yahoo and Yahoo had a very interesting problem which is they needed to build analytics for their advertisers to help those advertisers to optimize or spend across the Yahoo ad network and what I learned there in fact what I unlearned there was that everything that I had learned about bi and data warehouse and how you constructed data warehouses how you were so schema centric how everything was evolved around tabular data at Yahoo there was an entirely different approach the of my first introduction to Hadoop and the concept of a data Lake that was my first real introduction into data science and how to do predictive analytics and prescriptive analytics and in fact it was it was such a huge change for me that I was I was asked to come back to the TD WI data world Institute right was teaching for many years and I was asked to do a keynote after being at Yahoo for a year or so to share sort of what were the observations what did I learn and I remember I stood up there in front of about 600 people and I started my presentation by saying everything I've taught you the past 20 years is wrong and it was well I didn't get invited back for 10 years so that probably tells you something but it was really about unlearning a lot about what I had learned before and probably max one of the things that was most one of the aha moments for me was bi was very focused on understanding the questions that people were trying to ask an answer davus science is about us to understand the decisions they're trying to take action on questions by their very nature our informative but decisions are actionable and so what we did at Yahoo in order to really drive the help our advertisers optimize your spend across the Yahoo ad network is we focus on identifying the decisions the media planners and buyers and the campaign managers had to make around running a campaign know what what how much money to allocate to what sides how much how many conversions do I want how many impressions do I want so all the decisions we built predictive analytics around so that we can deliver prescriptive actions to these two classes of stakeholders the media planners and buyers and the campaign managers who had no aspirations about being analysts they're trying to be the best digital marketing executives or you know or people they could possibly be they didn't want to be analysts so and that sort of leads me to where I am today and my my teaching my books my blogs everything I do is very much around how do we take data and analytics and help organizations become more effective so everything I've done since then the books I've written the teaching I do with University of San Francisco and next week at the National University of Ireland and Galway and all the clients I work with is really how do we take data and analytics and help organizations become more effective at driving the decisions that optimize their business and their operational models it's really about decisions and how do we leverage data and analytics to drive those decisions so what would how would you define the difference between a question that someone's trying to answer versus a decision but they're trying to be better informed on so here's what I'd put it I call it the Sam test I am and that is it strategic is it actionable is it material and so you can ask questions that are provocative but you might not fast questions that are strategic to the problems you're trying to solve you may not be able to ask questions that are actionable in a sense you know what to do and you don't necessarily ask questions that are material in the sense that the value of that question is greater than the cost of answering that question right and so if I think about the Sam test when I apply it to data science and decisions when I start mining the data so I know what decisions are most important I'm going through a process to identify to validate the value and prioritize those decisions right I understand what decisions are most important now when I start to dig through the data all this structured unstructured data across a number different data sources I'm looking for I'm trying to codify patterns and relationships buried in that data and I'm applying the Sam test is that against those insights is it strategic to the problem I'm trying to solve can I actually act on it and is it material in the sense that it's it's it's more valuable to act than it is to create the action around it so that's the to me that big difference is by their very nature decisions are actually trying to make a decision I'm going to take an action questions by their nature are informative interesting they could be very provocative you know questions have an important role but ultimately questions do not necessarily lead to actions so if I'm a a sport coach I'm writing a professional basketball team some of the decisions I'm trying to make are I'm deciding on what program best develops my players what metrics will help me decide who the best prospect is is that the right way of looking at it yeah so we did an exercise at at USF too to have the students go through an exercise - what question what decisions does Steve Kerr need to make over the next two games he's playing right and we go through an exercise of the identifying especially in game decisions exercise routes oh no how often are you gonna play somebody no how long are they gonna play what are the right combinations what are the kind of offensive plays that you're gonna try to run so there's a know a bunch of decisions that Steve Kerr is coach of the Warriors for example needs to make in the game to not only try to win the game but to also minimize wear and tear on his players and by the way that's a really good point to think about the decisions good decisions are always a conflict of other ideas right win the game while minimizing wear and tear on my players right there's there are there are all the important decisions in life have two three or four different variables that may not be exactly the same which is by this is where data science comes in the data science is going to look across those three or four very other metrics against what you're going to measure success and try to figure out what's the right balance of those given the situation I'm in so if going back to the decision about about playing time well think about all the data you might want to look at in order to optimize that so when's the next game how far are they in this in this in the season where do they currently sit ranking wise how many minutes per game has player X been playing looking over the past few years what's there you know what's their maximum point so there's there's a there's not a lot of decisions that people are trying to make and by the way the beauty of the decisions is the decisions really haven't changed in years right what's changed is not the decisions it's the answers and the answers have changed because we have this great bound of data available to us in game performance health data you know all DNA data all kinds of other data and then we have all these great advanced analytic techniques now neural networks and unstructured supervised machine learning on right all this great technology now that can help us to uncover those relationships and patterns that are buried in the data that we can use to help individualize those decisions one last point there the point there to me at the end when when people talk about Big Data they get fixated on the big part the volume part it's not the volume of big data that I'm going to monetize it's the granularity and what I mean by that is I now have the ability to build very detailed profiles going back to our basketball example I can build a very detailed performance profile on every one of my players so for every one of the players on the Warriors team I can build a very detailed profile it the details out you know what's their optimal playing time you know how much time should they spend before a break on the feet on the on the on the court right what are the right combinations of players in order to generate the most offense or the best defense I can build these very detailed individual profiles and then I can start mission together to find the right combination so when we talk about big it's not the volume it's interesting it's the granularity gotcha and what's interesting from my world is so when you're dealing with marketing and business a lot of that when you're developing whether it be a company that you're trying to find more out about your customers or your startup trying to learn about what product you should develop there's tons of unknowns and a lot of big data from my understanding it can help you better understand some patterns within customers how to market you know in your book you talk about oh we need to increase sales at Chipotle because we understand X Y & Z our current around us now in the sports science world we have our friend called science and science has helped us early identify certain metrics that are very important and correlated to different physiological outcomes so it almost gives us a shortcut because in the big data world especially when you're dealing with the data that you guys are dealing with and trying to understand customer decisions each customer is individual and you're trying to compile all together to find patterns no one's doing science on that right it's not like a lab work where someone is understanding muscle protein synthesis and the amount of nutrients you need to recover from it so in my position I have all these pillars that maybe exist already where I can begin my search there's still a bunch of unknowns with that kind of environment do you take a different approach or do you still go with the I guess large encompassing and collect everything you can and siphon after maybe I'm totally wrong I'll let you take it away no that's it's a it's a good question and what's interesting about that max is that the human body is governed by a series of laws we'll say in each me see ology and the things you've talked about physics they have laws humans as buyers you know shoppers travelers we have propensity x' we don't have laws right I have a propensity that I'm gonna try to fly United because I get easier upgrades but I might fly you know Southwest because of schedule or convenience right I have propensity x' I don't have laws so you have laws that work to your advantage what's interesting about laws that they start going into the world of IOT and this concept called digital twins they're governed by laws of physics I have a compressor or a chiller or an engine and it's got a bunch of components in it that have been engineered together and I can actually apply the laws I can actually run simulations against my digital twins to understand exactly when is something likely to break what's the remaining useful life in that product what's the severity of the the maintenance I need to do on that so the human body unlike the human psyche is governed by laws human behaviors are really hard right and we move the las vegas is built on the fact that human behaviors are so flawed but body mate but bat body physics like the physics that run these devices you can actually build models and one simulation to figure out exactly how you know what's the wear and tear and what's the extensibility of what you can operate in gotcha yeah so that's when from our world you start looking at subsystems and you say okay this is your muscular system this is your autonomic nervous system this is your central nervous system these are ways that we can begin to measure it and then we can wrote a blog on this that's a stress response model where you understand these systems and their inferences for the most part and then you apply a stress and you see how the body responds and even you determine okay well if I know the body I can only respond in a certain number of ways it's either compensatory it's gonna be you know returning to baseline and by the mal adaptation but there's only so many ways when you look at a cell at the individual level that that cell can actually respond and it's the aggregation of all these cellular responses that end up and manifest in a change in a subsystem and that subsystem can be measured inferential II through certain technology that we have but I also think at the same time we make a huge leap and that leap is the word inference right we're making an assumption and sometimes those assumptions are very dangerous and they lead to because that assumptions unknown and we're wrong on it then we kind of sway and missed a little bit on our whole projection so I like the idea of looking at patterns and look at the probabilistic nature of it and I'm actually kind of recently change my view a little bit from my room first I talked about this I was much more hardwired and laws but I think it's a law but maybe a law with some level of variation or standard deviation and it we have guardrails instead so that's kind of how I think about it personally is that something that you say that's on the right track for that or how would you approach it yeah actually there's a lot of similarities max so your description of the human body made up of subsystems when we talk to organizations about things like smart cities or smart malls or smart hospitals a smart city is comprised of a it's made up of a series of subsystems right I've got subsystems regarding water and wastewater traffic safety you know local development things like this look there's a bunch of subsystems that make a city work and each of those subsystems is comprised of a series of decisions or clusters of decisions with equal use cases around what you're trying to optimize so if I'm trying to improve traffic flow if one of my subsystems is practically flow there are a bunch of use cases there about where do I do maintenance where do I expand the roads you know where do I put HOV lanes right so and so you start taking apart the smart city into the subsystems and then know the subsystems are comprised of use cases that puts you into really good position now here's something we did recently with a client who is trying to think about building the theme park of the future and how do we make certain that we really have a holistic view of the use cases that I need to go after it's really easy to identify the use cases within your own four walls but digital transformation in particular happens outside the four walls of an organization and so what we what we're doing is a process where we're building journey maps for all their key stakeholders so you've got a journey map for a customer you have a journey map for operations you have a journey map for partners and such so you you build these journey maps and you start thinking about for example I'm a theme park and at some point in time my guest / customer is going to have a pity they want to go do something you want to go on vacation at that point in time that theme park is competing against not only all the other theme parks but it's competing against major league baseball who's got things it's competing against you know going to the beach in Sanibel Island just hanging around right there they're competing at that point and if they only start engaging the customer when the customers actually contacted them they must a huge part of the market they made you miss a huge chance to influence that person's agenda and so one of the things that think about I don't know how this applies to your space max but as we started thinking about smart entities we use design thinking and customer journey match there's a way to make certain that we're not fooling ourselves by only looking within the four walls of our organization that we're knocking those walls down making them very forest and we're looking at what happens before somebody engages it with us and even afterwards so again going back to the theme park example once they leave the theme park they're probably posting on social media what kind of fun they had or fun they didn't have they're probably making plans for next year they're talking to friends and other things so there's there's a bunch of stuff we're gonna call it afterglow that happens after event that you want to make certain that you're in part of influencing that so again I don't know how when you combined the data science of use cases and decisions with design thinking of journey Maps what that might mean to do that your business but for us in thinking about smart cities it's opened up all kinds of possibilities and most importantly for our customers it's opened up all kinds of new areas where they can create new sources of value so anyone listening to this need to understand that when the word client or customer is used it can be substituted for athlete and what I think is really important is that when we hear you talk about your the the amount of infrastructure you do for an idea when you approach a situation is something that sports science for in my opinion especially across multiple domains it's truly lacking what happens is we get a piece of technology and someone says go do science while you're taking the approach of let's actually think out what we're doing beforehand let's determine our key performance indicators let's understand maybe the journey that this piece of technology is going to take with the athlete or how the athletes going to interact with this piece of technology throughout their four years if you're in the private sector right that afterglow effect might be something that you refer to as a client retention and their ability to come back over and over and spread your own word for you if you're in the sector with student athletes maybe it's those athletes talking highly about your program to help with recruiting and understanding that developing athletes is going to help you know make that college more enticing to go to or that program or that organization but what really stood out was the fact that you have this infrastructure built beforehand and the example I give I spoke with a good number of organizations and teams about data utilization is that if if you're to all of a sudden be dropped in the middle of the woods and someone says go build a cabin now how was it a giant forest I could use as much wood as I want I could just keep chopping down trees until I had something that had with a shelter of some sort right even I could probably do that well if someone said you know what you have three trees to cut down to make a cabin you could become very efficient and you're going to think about each chop in each piece of wood and how it's going to be used and your interaction with that wood and conjunction with that woods interaction with yourself and so when we start looking at athlete development and we're looking at client retention or we're looking at general health and wellness it's not just oh this is a great idea right we want to make the world's greatest theme park and we want to make the world's greatest training facility but what infrastructure and steps you need to take and you said stakeholders so what individuals am i working with am I talking with the physical therapist am i talking with the athletic trainer am I talking with the skill coach how does the skill coach want the data presented to them maybe that's different than how the athletic trainer is going to have a day to present it to them maybe the sport coach doesn't want to see the data unless something a red flag comes up so now you have all these different entities just like how you're talking about developing this customer journey throughout the theme park and making sure that they have a you know an experience that's memorable and causes an afterglow and really gives that experience meaning how can we now take data and apply it in the same way so we get the most value like you said on the granular aspect of data and really turn that into something valuable max you said something really important and one of the things that let me share one of many horror stories that that that comes up in my daily life which is somebody walking up to me and saying hey I got a client here's their data you know go do some science on it like well well what the heck right so when we created this thing called the hypothesis development canvas our sales teams hate it or do the time our data science teams love it because we do all this pre work we just say we make sure we understand the problem we're going after the decision they're trying to make the KPI is it's what you're going to measure success in progress what are they the operational and financial business benefits what are the data sources we want to consider here's something by the way that's it's important that maybe I wish Boeing would have thought more about which is what are the costs of false positives and false negatives right do you really understand where your risks points are and the reason why false positive and false negatives are really important in data science because data size is making predictions and by virtue of making predictions we are never 100% certain that's right or not predictions hath me built on I'm good enough well when is good enough good enough and a lot of that determination as to when is good enough good enough is really around the cost of false positives and false negatives think about a professional athlete like the false the you know the ramifications of overtraining professional athlete like a Kevin Durant or Steph Curry and they're out for the playoffs as huge financial implications them personally and for the organization so you really need to make sure you understand exactly what's the cost of being wrong and so this hypothesis development canvas is we do a lot of this work before we ever put science to the data that yeah it's it's something that's lacking across not just sports science but many fields and what I mean by that is especially you referred to the hypothesis canvas it's a piece of paper that provides a common language right it's you can sit it out before and for listeners who aren't aware a hypothesis canvas is something bill has worked and developed with his team and it's about 13 different squares and boxes and you can manipulate it based on your own profession and what you're diving into but essentially it goes through the infrastructure that you need to have setup in order for this hypothesis or idea or decision to actually be worth a damn and what I mean by that is that so many times and I hate this but I'm gonna go in a little bit of a rant and I apologize that people think oh I get an idea and they think Thomas Edison all son just had an idea and he made a light bulb Thomas Edison's famous for saying you know I did you know make a light bulb I learned was a 9000 ways to not make a light bulb and what I mean by that is he set an environment that allowed for failure and allowed for learning but what happens often people think oh I have an idea they think the idea comes not just you know in a flash because it always doesn't it might come from some research but they also believe that it comes with legs and it comes with the infrastructure supported around it that's kind of the same way that I see a lot of the data aspect going in regards to our field is that we did an idea we immediately implement and we hope it works as opposed to set up a learning environment that allows you to go okay here's what I think might happen here's my hypothesis here's I'm going to apply it and now if I fail because I have the infrastructure pre mapped out I can look at my infrastructure and say you know what that support beam or that individual box itself was the weak link and we made a mistake here but we can go back and fix it

Published Date : Mar 25 2019

**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Steve KerrPERSON

0.99+

Kevin DurantPERSON

0.99+

Procter & GambleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Steph CurryPERSON

0.99+

YahooORGANIZATION

0.99+

Sanibel IslandLOCATION

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Procter & GambleORGANIZATION

0.99+

ChipotleORGANIZATION

0.99+

WalmartORGANIZATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

a yearQUANTITY

0.99+

9000 waysQUANTITY

0.99+

BoeingORGANIZATION

0.99+

Hitachi van TaraORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bill SchmarzoPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

BeckyPERSON

0.99+

Thomas EdisonPERSON

0.99+

IOCORGANIZATION

0.99+

each pieceQUANTITY

0.99+

WarriorsORGANIZATION

0.99+

University of San FranciscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

HadoopTITLE

0.99+

eachQUANTITY

0.99+

each chopQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.98+

Thomas EdisonPERSON

0.98+

four yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

next weekDATE

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

billPERSON

0.98+

late 1980sDATE

0.98+

Forrest GumpPERSON

0.98+

20 25 yearsQUANTITY

0.97+

first timeQUANTITY

0.97+

two classesQUANTITY

0.97+

HarvardORGANIZATION

0.97+

first introductionQUANTITY

0.96+

four different variablesQUANTITY

0.96+

singleQUANTITY

0.94+

Coe CollegeORGANIZATION

0.94+

each customerQUANTITY

0.94+

two gamesQUANTITY

0.94+

bothQUANTITY

0.94+

DeanPERSON

0.93+

about 600 peopleQUANTITY

0.93+

yearsQUANTITY

0.92+

USFORGANIZATION

0.92+

ta world InstituteORGANIZATION

0.92+

oneQUANTITY

0.91+

one of my subsystemsQUANTITY

0.9+

about 13 different squaresQUANTITY

0.89+

a dayQUANTITY

0.88+

GalwayLOCATION

0.86+

88DATE

0.86+

National University of IrelandORGANIZATION

0.85+

StrongyByScienceTITLE

0.82+

BillPERSON

0.81+

SouthwestLOCATION

0.81+

TD WIORGANIZATION

0.81+

tons of unknownsQUANTITY

0.81+

Sam testTITLE

0.8+

bill SchwarzPERSON

0.8+

lot of timesQUANTITY

0.78+

87DATE

0.78+

three treesQUANTITY

0.78+

boxesQUANTITY

0.77+

many timesQUANTITY

0.74+

UnitedORGANIZATION

0.72+

one last pointQUANTITY

0.7+

one of the thingsQUANTITY

0.68+

past 20 yearsDATE

0.67+

Part OneOTHER

0.67+

other metricsQUANTITY

0.65+

IranORGANIZATION

0.65+

four wallsQUANTITY

0.63+

past few yearsDATE

0.62+

maxPERSON

0.62+

Paul Martino, Bullpen Capital | CUBEConversation, February 2019


 

(upbeat music) >> Welcome to this special Cube Conversation. We're here in Palo Alto, California with a special guest. Dialing in remotely Paul Martino, the founder of Bullpen Capital and also the producer of an upcoming film called The Inside Game. It's a story about a true story about an NBA betting scandal. It's really, it's got everything you want to know. It's got sports, it's got gambling, it's got fixing of games. Paul Martino, known for being a serial entrepreneur and then an investor, investing in some great growth companies, and now running his own firm called Bullpen Capital, which bets on high-growth companies and takes them to the next level. Paul, great to see you. Thanks for spending the time. Good to see you again. >> John, always good to see you. Thanks for having me on the show. >> So, you're a unique individual. You're a computer science whiz, investor, entrepreneur, now film producer. This story kind of crosses over your interests. Obviously in Philly, you're kind of like me, kind of a blue collar kind of guy. You know hot starters when you see it. You also were an investor in a lot of the sports, gambling, betting, kind of online games, we've talked about in the past. But now you're crossing over into filming movies. Which is, seems like very cool and obviously we're living in a date of digital media where code is software, code is content, obviously we believe that. What's this movie all about? All the buzz is out there, Inside Game. You get it on sports radio all the time. Give us the scoop. Why Inside Game? What's it about? Give us the 411. >> Yeah, so John, I mean, this is a story that picked me. My producing partner in this is a guy named Michael Pierce who made a bunch of great movies, including The Cooler, one of the best gambling movies, with William H Macy. And he says sometimes the movie picks you and sometimes you pick the movie. And I wasn't sitting around one day going wow I want to be a movie producer, it was just much more that my cousin is the principal in the story. My cousin was the go-between between the gambler and the referee. The three of them were friends ever since they were kids. And when they all got out of jail Tommy called me, Tommy Martino. He said hey Paulie, you're about the only legitimate business guy I know. Could you help me with my life rights? And that's how this started almost six years ago. >> And what progressed next? You sat down, had a couple cocktails, beers, said okay here's how we're going to structure it. Was it more brainstorming and then it kind of went from there? Take us through that progression. >> It was a pure intellectual property exercise, and this is where being a startup guy was helpful. I was like, Tommy, I'll buy your life rights. Maybe we'll get a script written, we'll put it on the shelf, so that if anybody ever wants to make this story they have to go through us. Almost like a blocking patent or a copyright. And he's like okay cool. And so I said I have no delusions of ever making this movie. I actually don't know that, I don't know anybody to make a movie. This is not my skill set. But if anybody ever wants to make the movie, they're going to have to come deal with us. And then the lucky break happens, like anything in a startup. I have this random meeting with a guy named Michael Pierce, who was at a firm called WPS Challenger out of London. And we're down in Hillstone in Santa Monica, and I say to him, I say I've got this script written about this NBA betting scandal, would you do me a favor? He literally laughs in my face. He goes a venture guy from Silicon Valley is going to hand me a script. What a bad, anyway, I was like look dude, I'm a good guy to have owe you a favor so just read this dang thing. About 8 hours later my phone rings, he says who the hell is Andy Callahan? This is the best script I've ever read in my entire life. Let's go make a movie. Andy Callahan was a friend of a friend from high school who wrote the script. He actually once beat Kobe Bryant when he was a center at Haverford when Kobe Bryant played at Lower Merion here in the Philly suburbs. So, it's kind of this local Philly story. I'm a local Philly blue collar guy, we put the pieces together, and I'll be danged and now six years later the film is in the can and you're probably going to see it during the NBA finals this year in June. >> All right, so there's some news out there it's on the cover on ESPN Magazine, the site is now launched. I've been hearing buzz all morning on this in the sports radio world. A lot of buzz, a lot of organic virality around it. Reminds of the Crazy, Rich Asians, which kind of started organically, similar kind of community behind it. This has really got some legs to it. Give us some taste of what's some of the latest organic growth here around the buzz. >> Yeah so, think about this. This happened in, primarily '06 and '07. They were sentenced in 2010 and were in jail in 2011. It is 2019 and the front page story on ESPN is What Tim, Tommy, and Jimmy Battista Did. Those were the three guys, the gambler, the ref, and the go-between. And this is a front page story on ESPN all these years later. So we know this story has tremendous legs. We know this movie has a tremendous built-in audience. And so now it's just our job to leverage all those marketing channels, places we pioneered, like Zynga and FanDuel to get people who care about the story into the theaters. And we're hoping we can really show people how to do a modern way to market a film using those channels we've pioneered at places like FanDuel and Zynga. >> You and I have had many conversations privately and here on the Cube in the past around startups disruption, and it's the same pattern right? No one thinks it's a great idea, you get the rights to it, and you kind of got to find that inflection point, that magical moment which comes through networking and just hard work and hustle. And then you've got everything comes together. And then it comes together. And then it grows. As the world changes, you're seeing digital completely change the game on Hollywood. For instance, Netflix, you've got Prime, you've got Hulu. This is, essentially, a democratization, I'm not saying, well first of all you've made some money so you had some dough to put into it, but here's a script from a friend. You guys put it together. This is now the new startup model going to Hollywood. Talk about that dynamic, what's your vision there? Because this, I think, is an important signal in how digital content, whether it's guys in the Cube doing stuff or Cube Studios, which we'll, we have a vision for. This is something that's real. Talk about the dynamic. How do you see the entrepeneurial vision around how movies are made, how content's made, and then, ultimately, how they're merchandised in the future. >> Right, there's a whole, there's a whole bunch of buckets. There's the intellectual property bucket of the story, the script, etc. Then there's the bucket of getting the movie made. You know, that's the on the set and that's the director and that's post-production, and then there's the marketing. And what was really interesting is even though I'd never made a movie, two of those three buckets I knew a tremendous amount about from my experience as a startup investor. The marketing and the IP side I understood almost completely, even though I'd never made a film. And so all of the disruptive technologies that we learn for doing disruptive things like marketing a new thing called Daily Fantasy Sports, we were able to bring to bear to this film. Now, I had fun on the set and meeting all the actors, etc. But I had no delusion that I knew about the making of the movie part. So I plead ignorance there, but of the three buckets that you need to go make something in the media space 66% of what I knew as a startup guy overlapped and I think this is what the future of the media is. Because guys like me and you, John, we actually know a lot about this because we're startup people as opposed to we have to learn about it in terms of how to market and how to get an audience. I mean, my last company Aggregate Knowledge designs custom audiences for ad targeting. So we know how to find gamblers to go see this movie. That's literally the company I started. And so that's a thing that I'm very, very comfortable with and it's exciting to then work with the producer who did the creative and the director and I say hey guys, I've got this marketing thing under control, I know how to do it, oh by the way, the old Head of Marketing from FanDuel, he's a consultant to the project. Right, so, we got that. >> You got that, and the movie's being made. That's also again, back to entrepreneurship, risk. You got to take risks, right? This is all about risk management at the end of the day and you know, navigating as the lead entrepreneur, getting it done, there's heavy lifting and costs involved in making the movie, >> Right >> How did you, that's like production, right? You got to build a product. That is ultimately the product when it has to get to market. How did that go, what's your thoughts on your first time running a movie like this, from a production standpoint, learnings, observations? >> I learned a tremendous amount. I must admit, I was along for the ride on that piece of the puddle, puzzle. The product development piece of this was all new to me. But then again, I mean think about it, John, I started four companies, a social network, an ad targeting company, a game company, and a security company. I didn't know anything about those four companies when I started them either in terms of what the product needed to do. So learning a new product called make a movie was kind of par for the course, even though I didn't really know anything about it. You know, if you're going to be a startup person you got to have no fear. That's the real attribute you need to have in these kinds of situations. >> So I got to >> And so, witnessed that first-hand and, you know what, now, if I ever make a movie again I kind of know how to make that product. >> Yeah, well looking forward. You've got great instincts as an entrepreneur. I love hanging out with you. I got to ask you a question. I talk to a lot of young people, my son and his friends and I see people coming out of business school, all this stuff. You know, every college has an entrepreneurial program. Music, film, you know, whatever, they all have kind of bolted on entrepreneurship. You're essentially breaking down that kind of dogma of that you have to have a discipline. Anyone can do this, right? So talk about the folks that are out there, trying to be entrepreneurial, whether you're a musician. This is direct to consumer. If you have skills as an entrepreneur it translates. Talk about what it takes to be an entrepreneur, if you're a musician or someone who has, say, content rights or has content story. What do they do? What's your advice? >> We have lived through, perhaps the most awesome period of the last five to 10 years, where it got cheap to do a startup. You know, when we're doing our first startups 20 years ago, it cost 5 million bucks to go get a license from Oracle and go hire a DBA and do all that stuff. You know what, for 5 grand you can get your website up, you can build, you can use your iPhone, you can film your movie. That's all happened in the last five to 10 years. And what it's done is exactly the word you used. It's democratized who can become an entrepreneur. Now people who never thought entrepreneurship was for them, are able to do it. One of our great examples of this is Ipsy, our cosmetics company. You know, Michelle Phan was a cocktail waitress working in Florida, but she had this YouTube following around watching her videos of her putting her makeup on. And you know when we met her, we're like you know what? You're the next generation of what entrepreneurs look like. Because no, she didn't go to Stanford. She didn't have a PhD in computer science, but she knew what this next generation of content marketing was going to look like. She knew what it was to be a celebrity influencer. You know, that company Ipsy makes hundreds of millions of dollars every year now, and I don't think most people on Sand Hill would've necessarily given Michelle the chance because she didn't look like what the traditional entrepreneur looked like. So it's so cool we live in a time where you don't need to look like what you think an entrepreneur needs to look like or went to the school you had to think you'd go to to become an entrepreneur. It's open to everybody now. >> And the key to success, you know, again, we've talked about those privately all the time when we meet, but I want to get your comment on the record here. But I mean, there's some basic blocking and tackling that's independent of where you went to school that's being creative, networking, networking, networking, you know, and being, good hustle. And being, obviously good judgment and being smart. Do your thoughts on the keys to success for as those folks saying hey you know I didn't have to go to these big, fancy schools. I want to go out there. I want to test my idea. I want to go push the envelope. I want to go for it. What's the tried and true formula from your perspective? >> So when you're in the early stage of hustling and you want to figure out if you're good at being an entrepreneur, I tell entrepreneurs this all the time. Every meeting is a job interview. Now, you might not think it's a job interview, but you want to think about every meeting, this might be the next person I start my company with. This might be the person I end up hiring to go run something at my company. This might be the person I end up getting money for, from to start my company. And so show up, have some skills, have some passion, have a vision, and impress the person on the other side of the table. Every once in a while I get invited to a college and they're like well Paul, life's easy for you, you started a company with Mark Pinkus and you're friend with Reid Hoffman and this... Well how the hell do you think I met those people? I did the same thing I'm telling you to do. When I was nobody coming out of school, I went and did stuff for these guys. I helped them with a business plan. I wrote the code of Tribe, and then now all of the sudden we've got a whole network of people you can go to. Well, that didn't happen by accident. You had to show up and have some skills, talent, and passion and then impress the person on the other side of the table. >> Yeah >> And guess what? If you do that enough times in a row, you're going to end up having your own network. And then you're going to have kids come in and say, wow, how can I impress you? >> Be authentic, be genuine, hustle, do networking, do the job interview, great stuff. All right, back to final point I want to get your thoughts on because I think this is your success and getting this movie out of the gate. Everyone, first, everyone should go see Inside Game. Insidegamemovie.com is the URL. The site just went up. This should be a great movie. I'm looking forward to it, and knowing the work that went in, I followed your journey on this. It should be great. I'm looking forward to seeing it. Uh, digital media, um, your thoughts because we're seeing a direct to consumer model. You've got the big companies, YouTube, Amazon, others. There's kind of a, a huge distribution of those guys. The classic Web 2.0 search kind of paradigm and portal. But now you've got a whole 'nother set of distribution or network effects. Your thoughts, because you were involved in, again, social networking before it became the monster that it is now. How is digital media changing? What's your vision of how that's happening and how does someone jump on that wave and be successful? >> Yeah, we're in the midst of disruption. I mean, I'm in the discussions and final negotiations right now on how we're going to end up ultimately doing the film distribution. And I am very disappointed with the quality of the thinking of the people on the other side of the table. Because they come from very traditional backgrounds. And I'm talking to them about, I want to do a site takeover across Zynga. I want to do a digital download on FanDuel of a 20 minute clip of the film. And they're like what's FanDuel? Who's Zynga? And I'm sitting there, I'm like guys, this is the new media. Oh, by the way, there's a sports app called Wave and Wave is where the local influencers in the markets who want to write the stories are, and we want to do a deal with those guys. And oh, by the way, the CEO of that company is a buddy of mine I met years ago, right? One of those kids I gave advice to, and now I'm going to ask him for a favor from, right, that's how it works. But, it's amazing when you have these conversations with traditional old line media companies. They don't understand any of the words coming out of your mouth. They're like Paul, here's how much I'll give you for your film. Thank you, we'll go market it. I'm like, really? Seriously? I got the former CMO of FanDuel going to help out on this. You don't want to talk to him? >> Yeah >> And so this is where the industry is really ripe for disruption. Because the people from the startup world have already disrupted the apple cart and now we've just got to demonstrate that this model is going to continue to work for the future and be ready when the next new kind of digital transmedia thing comes along and embrace that, as opposed to be scared to death of it or not even know how to talk the language of the people on it. >> Well, you're doing some amazing venturing in your, kind of, unique venture capital model on Bullpen Capital. Certainly isn't your classic venture capital thing, so I'm sure people are going to be talking to you about oh, Paul, are all VCs going to be doing movies? I'm sure that's a narrative that's out there. But you're not just a normal venture capital. You certainly invest. So, venture capitals have reputation issues right now. People talk about, well, you know, they're group think. You know, they only invest in who they see themselves. You mentioned that comment there. The world's changing in venture. Your thoughts on that, how you guys started your firm, and your evolution of venture capital. And is this a sign that you'll see venture capitalists go into movies? >> Well, I don't know about that part. There have been a couple venture people who have done movies. But the part I will talk about is the you got to know somebody, it's an inside game, ha ha, we'll play double entendre on Inside Game here. You know, 20% of the deal we've done at Bullpen, we've done over 100. 20% of them were cold emails on something like LinkedIn or business plans at bullpen.com. 20%, now there's this old trope in venture if you don't get a warm intro I won't even talk to you. Well 20% of our deals came in and we had no idea who the person on the other side was. That's how we run the firm. And so if you're out there going I'm one of those entrepreneurs in the Midwest and no one, I don't know anyone. I'm not in a network, send me a plan. I'm someone who's going to look at it. It doesn't mean I'm going to be an investor, but you know what I'm going to do? I'm going to give you a shot. And I don't care where you're from or what school you went to or what social clique you're in or what your political persuasion is. Matter of fact, I literally don't care. I'm going to give you a shot. Come into my office and that, I think, is what was missing in a lot of firms, where it's a we only do security and we only look at companies that spun out of Berkeley and Stanford. And yeah, there can be an old boys network in that. But you know what, we like to talk to everybody. And the more blue collar the CEO is, the more we love them at Bullpen. >> That's awesome. Talk about the movie real quick on terms of how Hollywood's handling it. Um, expectations, in terms of reaction, was it positive, is it positive, what's the vibe going on in Hollywood, is this going to be a grassroots kind of thing around the FanDuels and your channels? What's your plan for that and what's the reaction of Hollywood? >> So it's going to be a lot of all of the above. But PR is going to be a huge component, I mean, part of the reason we're on today is there's a huge front page story on ESPN about Tim Donaghy and the NBA betting scandal of 2007. And so the earned media is going to be a huge component of this. And I think this is where the Hollywood people do understand the language we're speaking. We're like, look, we have a huge built-in audience that we know how to market to. We have a story. Actually, in the early days, you asked about risk? Back when I was thinking about if I would do this project I would do the following little market research. I'd walk into a sports bar, it didn't matter what town I was in. I could be in Dallas, I could be in Houston, I could be in Boston. I would literally walk up to the bar and say, hey, uh, six of you at the bar, ever hear of Tim Donaghy? It'd be amazing. About seven out of 10 people would go yeah he was the referee, crooked referee in the NBA. I'm like, this is amazing. Seven out of 10 people I meet in a bar know about the story I want to go tell. That sounds like a good chance to make a movie, as opposed to a movie that has no built-in audience. And so, a built-in audience with PR channels that we know work, I think we can really show Hollywood how to do this in a different way if this all works. >> And this comes back to my point around built-in audiences. You know, YouTube has got a million subscribers. That's kind of an old metric. That means they, like an RSS feed kind of model. That's a million people that are, could be, amplifying their network connections. It is a massive built-in audience. The iteration, the DevOps kind of mindset, we talk about cloud computing, can be applied to movies. It's agile movie making. That's what you're talking about. >> Yeah, and by the way, so we have a social network of all the actors and people in the film. So when it's ready, let's go activate our network of all the actors that are in the film. Each of them have a couple million followers. So let's go be smart. Let's, two weeks before the movie, let's send some screenshots. A week before the movie let's show some exclusive videos. Two days before the film, go see it, it's now out in the theaters. You know what, that's pretty, that's 101. We've got actors. We've got producers. Like, let's go use the influencer network we built that actually got the movie made. Let's go on Sports Talk, talk about the movie. Let's go on places like this and talk about how a venture guy made a movie. This is the confluence of all of the pieces all coming together at once. And I just don't think enough people in the film business or in the media business think big enough about going after these audiences. It's oh, we're going to take ads out on TV and I'm going to see my trailer and we're going to do this and that's how we do it. There's so many better ways to get your audience now. >> And this is going to change, just while I've got you here, it's just awesome, awesome conversation. Bringing it back to kind of the CMO in big companies, whether it's consumer or B to B or whatever, movies, the old model of here's our channels. There's certainly this earned media kind of formula and it's not your classic we've got a website, we're going to do all this instrumentation, it's a whole 'nother mechanism. So talk about, in your opinion, the importance of earned media, vis a vis the old other buckets. Owned media, paid media, well-defined Web 1.0, Web 2.0 tactics, earned media is not just how good is our PR? It's actually infrastructure channels, it's networks, a new kind of way to do things. How relevant and how important will this be going forward? Because there's no more website. It's a, you're basically building a media company for this movie. >> That is exactly right. We're building an ad hoc media business. I think this is what the next generation of digital agencies are going to look like. And there are some agencies that we've talked to that really understand all of what you've just said. They are few and far between, unfortunately. >> Yeah, well, Paul, this was theCube. We love talking to people, making it happen. Again, our model's the same as yours. We're open to anyone who's got signal, and you certainly are doing a great job and great to know you and follow your entrepreneur journey, your investment journey, and now your film making journey. Paul Martino, General Pen on Bullpen Capital, with the hot film Inside Game. I'm definitely going to see it. It should be really strong and it's going to be one of those movies like Crazy, Rich Asians, where not looking, not really well produced, I mean not predicted to be great and then goes game buster so I think this is going to be one of those examples. Paul, thanks for coming on. >> Love it, thank you! >> This Cube Conversation, I'm John Furrier here in Palo Alto, California, bringing ya all the action. Venture capitalist turned film maker Paul Martino with the movie Inside Game. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (triumphant music)

Published Date : Feb 20 2019

SUMMARY :

and also the producer of an upcoming film Thanks for having me on the show. in a lot of the sports, And he says sometimes the movie picks you going to structure it. I'm a good guy to have owe you a favor Reminds of the Crazy, Rich Asians, It is 2019 and the and here on the Cube in the past but of the three buckets that you need and costs involved in making the movie, You got to build a product. That's the real attribute you need to have I kind of know how to make that product. I got to ask you a question. period of the last five to 10 years, And the key to success, you know, Well how the hell do you And then you're going to and knowing the work that went in, of the people on the of the people on it. to be talking to you about You know, 20% of the deal is this going to be a And so the earned media is going to be And this comes back to my point of all the actors and people in the film. And this is going to change, I think this is what the next generation and great to know you and follow your here in Palo Alto, California,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Michelle PhanPERSON

0.99+

Michael PiercePERSON

0.99+

Paul MartinoPERSON

0.99+

2011DATE

0.99+

Tim DonaghyPERSON

0.99+

2010DATE

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Tommy MartinoPERSON

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

Andy CallahanPERSON

0.99+

ZyngaORGANIZATION

0.99+

FloridaLOCATION

0.99+

William H MacyPERSON

0.99+

PauliePERSON

0.99+

Bullpen CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

HoustonLOCATION

0.99+

SevenQUANTITY

0.99+

DallasLOCATION

0.99+

LondonLOCATION

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

TommyPERSON

0.99+

PaulPERSON

0.99+

MichellePERSON

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

WPS ChallengerORGANIZATION

0.99+

Kobe BryantPERSON

0.99+

Santa MonicaLOCATION

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

20%QUANTITY

0.99+

FanDuelORGANIZATION

0.99+

three guysQUANTITY

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

20 minuteQUANTITY

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo Alto, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

February 2019DATE

0.99+

The Inside GameTITLE

0.99+

Reid HoffmanPERSON

0.99+

66%QUANTITY

0.99+

BullpenORGANIZATION

0.99+

Inside GameTITLE

0.99+

Cube StudiosORGANIZATION

0.99+

Palo Alto, CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

Mark PinkusPERSON

0.99+

IpsyORGANIZATION

0.99+

HillstoneLOCATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

EachQUANTITY

0.99+

HuluORGANIZATION

0.99+

hundreds of millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

'07DATE

0.99+

ESPNORGANIZATION

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

'06DATE

0.99+

three bucketsQUANTITY

0.99+

Daily Fantasy SportsTITLE

0.98+

HollywoodORGANIZATION

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

Aggregate KnowledgeORGANIZATION

0.98+

John FurrierPERSON

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

a million peopleQUANTITY

0.98+

LinkedInORGANIZATION

0.98+

The CoolerTITLE

0.98+

Brian Carmody, INFINIDAT & Marc Creviere, US Signal | VMworld 2018


 

>> Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE covering VMworld 2018, brought to you by Vmware and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome to theCUBE, I'm Lisa Martin with Dave Vellante and Dave and I are at VMworld and this is day three for us. Two sets, Dave, 94 interviews over Monday, Tuesday, today, excited to welcome back to theCUBE one of our distinguished alumni, Brian Carmody, CTO of INFINIDAT. Hey Brian, good to see you. >> Hey guys, how are ya? >> And we also have from US Signal, Marc Creviere, principal systems engineer, one of your customers. Marc, nice to have you on theCUBE. >> Thanks, great to be here. >> So day three, everyone has their voices, that's impressive. Lots of news, lots of buzz. I've heard that this is the biggest VMworld so far. I think we've heard upwards of 25,000? >> I think it's a little over 21, 22 maybe, yeah. >> More than last year. Brian, would love to get your take on VMworld, but let's start with the business overview. What's new at INFINIDAT? >> Oh, things are going great. So this past summer, or this summer, we surpassed four exobytes of customer deployments. >> Congratulations. >> Yeah, our customers just have an enormous amount of capacity deployed globally. In March, we launched our portfolio, so we announced four new products including our flagship F6212. It's our highest capacity, our fastest InfiniBox ever. It's on track to be the fastest selling model and it's specifically designed to handle the explosive growth that we're seeing from multi petabyte per rack requirements and it's all being driven by demand in the analytic space and also in the cloud and service provider spaces. >> What are some of the things that you're hearing here at VMworld, your customers' responses to some of the huge momentum that you just described? >> Right, I mean, what customers ask for is number one, they want us to kind of double down on the fundamentals, which is make the unit cost, the unit economics of storage, go down every quarter. The product has to get cheaper every quarter. The second is maintaining reliability levels, so all of our systems come with a seven nines SLAs with less than three seconds of down time per system per year. In service provider environments, that's incredibly important because their customers are entrusting them with their operations, but the biggest change that we're seeing over time is this nonlinear, insatiable growth for increases in capacity. When we brought InfiniBox to market in 2013, our largest configuration was a petabyte of capacity per rack. We now have configurations with 10 petabytes of effective capacity per rack and we have customers that are screaming at us, asking us to double and triple that density. If there's one thing that doesn't change from year to year, is that there's always an awesome vibe at VMware, and that demand for storing huge massive amounts of information only increases every year. >> It's a place for practitioners to gather, right? The great thing about VMworld is this event has been hardcore practitioners, IT folks, and they haven't lost that. Marc, let's turn it to you, I mean US Signal, what are you guys all about, what's your role there, and I really want to get into how you're using INFINIDAT technology. >> Absolutely, I'm a principal systems engineer in our cloud engineering department. US Signal is an IT services provider based in Grand Rapids, Michigan. We've got a whole stack, we're network, co-location, data protection, infrastructure as a service, and disaster recovery, all as managed services. One thing that we're able to do, we actually have a fiber optic network that's about 14,000 route miles throughout the Midwest, so we're able to deliver a door to data center design, that's everything. As soon as that data leaves the customer premises, it never leaves our assets, which is a great thing we're able to deliver and we layer on top of that our data protection suites. We've had explosive growth in all these areas. That's one of the ways that INFINIDAT's really helped. We used to work in the challenges of managing hundreds of terabytes an hour on multi petabyte scale. Our infrastructure footprint has actually been doubling year over year, so it's matching what you're seeing as far as demand, I think we're matching that demand in our environment. It's not just data on an array, this is our customer's business, so we're really intensely focused on protecting that and delivering solutions and INFINIDAT's really helped us along that journey. >> We're going to get into that but the data center business is on fire. What do you see is the big growth drivers in your business? >> A lot of the drivers for us specifically is reduction of scope of PCI compliance and HIPPA compliance. Our entire offering is actually HIPPA and PCI compliant, so that's a big driver. We got a lot of traction in the financial and healthcare verticals. In organizations, you know, they've got initiative to get to the cloud. We're a very concierge level service. We help people get there whether it's into our cloud ideally or we even help people get to a hybrid approach, leveraging other partnerships as well. That's a big driver, and data protection. We're experts in disaster recovery and helping people not only have it in place but executing on the plan, testing the plan, because until you've tested it, you don't have a DR plan. >> You know Lisa, over the years I've had an opportunity to visit facilities of cloud service providers and I'd notice years ago, maybe it's even still this way in a lot of places, they had one of everything. They had a lot of diversity, a really heterogeneous environment, very hard to manage, a lot of stove pipes and so I'm interested in what led you to INFINIDAT. You got big platform, we just heard earlier that it can both do primary storage and data protection with the same fundamental architecture, so what was it about INFINIDAT that attracted you? Give us the before and after, if you would. >> Yeah, we'd made a pretty significant investment in another vendor's technology, and part of our role is determining cost and lead time as customer projects come in. We had a couple initiatives, one, reduce cost of course, two, reduce the wait time between when that request comes in and figuring how much is it going to cost, how long is it going to take to get in. One of the strongest areas that INFINIDAT was able to solve for us in that is that it's a known cost, the capacity's there. It's gone from a lot of variables on that to have an order come in, and they'll ask when can this be provisioned and I'll shoot an email back saying it's there, send the bill. >> Very cloud-like sort of model in terms of your customer's consumption. What has that meant for your business? >> It's allowed us to be a lot more agile. It's allowed us to be more competitive as far as executing on time frames and cost, as I just said. The relationship with INFINIDAT, I mean, we work with a lot of vendors that tell us here's the product, here's how to use it, whereas INFINIDAT, we really have a good dialogue of here's how we'd like to use it, can we make that work, and being involved in their product pipeline and really, not only being able to provide input but getting feedback on that input and in many cases, seeing it turn into actual product features. >> Is it a common theme that you hear amongst customers? How have you taken the US Signal input? Maybe you can give us some perspective on that. >> I think one of the ways that a lot of the incumbents whose businesses are evaporating and are being disrupted, a lot of places where they got in trouble is they thought okay, we're the 800 pound gorillas so we're now going to kind of decide what's happening in the market and how things should be and dictated that kind of ivory tower model of product management down into their customers. It turns out that if you're paying attention, your customers are way smarter than anybody in your business, because they're closer to where the rubber meets the road. We have what I think is a very successful program, we call it Social Product Management, where guys like US Signal get involved very early in the product development process. We come to them with ideas, hey, this is something we're thinking about building or this is a way we're thinking about modifying our API, and we bring prototypes and we have the kind of relationship where we can iterate on things starting with ideas all the way through to general availability, and the end result is we end up being able to leapfrog the incumbents who have those kind of traditional waterfall ivory tower models of innovation, and they end up with these impedance mismatches, where you're not really building the things that customers need for their next big challenge. >> That's why we're all here, right? We hear that at every event, and you do too, it's all about customers, giving them choice. At the end of the day though, you have to be able to, sounds like, Brian, what you guys have at INFINIDAT, is the symbiotic relationship with your customers who are helping to significantly influence the product development because that's who, it's the US Signals of the world who need to be using this technology so you're not creating it in a vacuum. Sounds like a very highly collaborative environment that is allowing you, it sounds like, to leapfrog your competition. >> It is, it's highly collaborative and it's really hard, I'm not going to lie, because if you go and you ask 50 different customers how we should do something, you're going to get 50 different answers, and that's why you need a really strong product management team to kind of be able to tease out what customers want versus what customers need and oftentimes what they need, they don't know yet because it's a little bit ahead of the curve, and that's where the art of the product management comes into play. >> Marc, I've known Brian for a while. You've briefed me many times, we've done a lot of interviews together. I want to test something that Brian has convinced me of, but I want to hear it from the customer. >> Sounds like trouble. >> Think about INFINIDAT. I hear all the time, simplicity, cost effective, but yet faster than Flash and a variety of use cases with the same architecture. I can use the system for both primary and secondary storage, and then the innovations that come along through with software I can roll back to serial number 001. Every system is able to take advantage of that. All true, has that been your experience? >> Absolutely, yeah, delivers on every one of those. >> Any deviation from those things, I mean come on, tell us the truth. >> No, no, we beat em up. One thing that's interesting about the service provider space is we don't necessarily know or control what the workload is. We know just anecdotally that we've got SQL, we know anecdotally that we've got Oracle and SAP in our environment, and the system stands up to all of it. I mean, it outperforms the platform that we came from by multitudes of degree. As an example, we've got previous platform, multi day preparation for an upgrade. We do 40 minutes a piece and we're done. We're off the phone, it's amazingly simple as compared to other platforms we've worked with. >> These guys, you go on the floor here, there's a lot of buzz, there's a lot of hype. These guys aren't a hype company. I've talked to dozens of your customers and have very similar stories, so I kind of already knew what the answer was. Kind of boring, but consistent. But were you nervous about working with a supplier that probably a lot of folks in your organization hadn't heard of? How'd you get through that? >> That was definitely a challenge early on. We had some people in the department that were very set in the mindset, like they knew what they wanted before the project started, right? Just rigorous testing and vetting and looking at the pedigree of Moshe, the founder of the company. There was a lot of trust put in what he's been able to do and seeing those progressions and yeah, it was a little bit of a leap of faith and we're absolutely glad we did it because it's been nothing but huge payoff. >> Yeah, guy who invented the modern storage business, I guess that helps, alright, good. >> Well Brian, you can't have anything more validating than the voice of a successful customer, so Marc, thanks so much for sharing what you're doing with INFINIDAT. Brian, thanks for stopping by and giving us an update. Sounds like we're going to be hearing some more great things coming from both of you guys in the near future. >> Thanks so much for having us. >> Thanks guys, thank you. >> Bye. >> We want to thank you for watching theCUBE. I'm Lisa Martin with Dave Vellante, we are at VMworld 2018, day three, stick around. We'll be back after a break. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Aug 29 2018

SUMMARY :

brought to you by Vmware and this is day three for us. Marc, nice to have you on theCUBE. the biggest VMworld so far. I think it's a little the business overview. of customer deployments. and it's specifically designed to handle and we have customers and I really want to and we layer on top of that the data center business is on fire. A lot of the drivers for us and data protection with the same and figuring how much is it going to cost, What has that meant for your business? and in many cases, seeing it turn How have you taken the US Signal input? a lot of the incumbents whose businesses US Signals of the world a little bit ahead of the curve, hear it from the customer. I hear all the time, simplicity, every one of those. on, tell us the truth. and the system stands up to all of it. I've talked to dozens of your customers and looking at the pedigree of Moshe, that helps, alright, good. both of you guys in the near future. We want to thank you

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavePERSON

0.99+

Marc CrevierePERSON

0.99+

MarcPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Brian CarmodyPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

BrianPERSON

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

10 petabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

MarchDATE

0.99+

VmwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

VMworldORGANIZATION

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

F6212COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

US SignalORGANIZATION

0.99+

800 poundQUANTITY

0.99+

Grand Rapids, MichiganLOCATION

0.99+

less than three secondsQUANTITY

0.99+

94 interviewsQUANTITY

0.99+

25,000QUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

INFINIDATORGANIZATION

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

50 different answersQUANTITY

0.99+

Two setsQUANTITY

0.98+

VMworld 2018EVENT

0.98+

001OTHER

0.98+

secondQUANTITY

0.98+

hundreds of terabytesQUANTITY

0.98+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.97+

one thingQUANTITY

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

this summerDATE

0.97+

50 different customersQUANTITY

0.97+

four new productsQUANTITY

0.96+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.95+

22QUANTITY

0.95+

SQLTITLE

0.94+

last yearDATE

0.94+

about 14,000 route milesQUANTITY

0.94+

day threeQUANTITY

0.93+

MondayDATE

0.91+

MidwestLOCATION

0.9+

SAPORGANIZATION

0.89+

past summerDATE

0.89+

FlashTITLE

0.88+

yearsDATE

0.88+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.88+

four exobytesQUANTITY

0.86+

One thingQUANTITY

0.86+

21QUANTITY

0.86+

tripleQUANTITY

0.83+

an hourQUANTITY

0.79+

40 minutes a pieceQUANTITY

0.79+

todayDATE

0.77+

USLOCATION

0.77+

seven nines SLAsQUANTITY

0.77+