Image Title

Search Results for Envision:

Steve Canepa & Jeffrey Hammond | CUBE Conversation, December 2020


 

(upbeat music) >> From ''theCUBE studios,'' in Palo Alto, in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is ''theCUBE Conversation.'' >> Hi, I'm John Walls. And as we're all aware, technology continues to evolve these days at an incredible pace and it's changing the way industries are doing their business all over the world and that's certainly true in telecommunications, CSPs all around the globe are developing plans on how to leverage the power of 5G technology and their network operations are certainly central to that mission. That is the genesis of ''IBM's Cloud for Telecommunications Service.'' That's a unified open hybrid architecture, that was recently launched and was developed to provide telecoms with the solutions they need to meet their very unique network demands and needs. I want us to talk more about that. I'm joined by Steve Canepa, who is the Global GM and Managing Director of the communication sector at IBM. Steve, good to see you today. >> Yeah, you too, John. >> And Jeffrey Hammond. So, he's the Principal Analyst and Vice President at Forrester. Jeffrey, thank you for your time as well today. Good to see you. >> Thanks a lot. It's great to be here. >> Yeah, Steve, let's just jump right in. First off, I mean, to me, the overarching question is, why telecom, I know that IBM has been very focused on providing these kinds of industries specific services, you've done very well in finance, now you're shifting over to telecom. What was the driver there? >> First, great to be with you today, John, and, you know, if we look at the marketplace, especially in 2020, I think the one thing that's, everyone can agree with, is that the rate and pace of change is just really accelerating and is a very, very dynamic marketplace. And so, if we look at the way both our personal lives are now guided by connectivity, and the use of multiple devices throughout the day, the same with our professional lives. So, connectivity really sits at the heart of how value and solutions are delivered and for businesses, this is becoming a critical issue. So, as we work with the telecommunication providers around the world, we're helping them transform their business to make it much more agile, to make it open and make them deliver new services much more quickly and to engage digitally with their clients to bring that kind of experience that we all expect now, so, that the rate pace of change, and the need for the telecommunications industry to bring new value, is really driving a tremendous opportunity for us to work with them. >> Jeffrey what's happening in the telecom space? That, I mean, these aren't just small trends, right? These are tectonic shifts that are going on in terms of their new capabilities and their needs. I'm sure this digital transformation has been driven in some part by COVID, but there are other forces going on here, I would assume too. What do you see from your analyst seat? >> Yeah, I look at it, you know, from a glass half full and a glass half empty approach. From a half empty approach, the shifts to remote work and remote learning, and from traditional retail channels, brick and mortar channels to digital ones, have really put a strain on the existing networking infrastructure, especially, at the Edge, but they've also demonstrated just how critical it is to get that right. You know, as an example, I'm actually talking to you today over my hotspot on my iPhone. So, I think a lot more about the performance of my local cell tower now than I ever did a year ago. and I want it to be as good as it can possibly be and give me as many capabilities as it can. From a glass half full perspective, the opportunities that a modernized network infrastructure gives us are, I think, more readily apparent than ever, you know, most of my wife's doctor's appointments have shifted to remote appointments and every time she calls up to connect, I kind of cringe in the other room and it's like, are they going to get video working? Are they going to get audio working? Are they actually going to have to shift to an old-style phone call to make this happen? Well, things like 5G really are poised to solve those kinds of challenges. They promise, 5G promises, exponential improvements in connectivity speed, capacity, and reductions in latency that are going to allow us to look at some really interesting workloads, IOT workloads, automation workloads, and a lot of Edge use cases. I think 5G sets the stage or Edge compute. Expanding Edge compute scenarios, make it possible to distribute data and services where businesses can best optimize their outcomes, whether it's IOT enabled assets, whether it's connected environments, whether it's personalization, whether it's rich content, AI, or even extended reality workloads. So, you might seem like, that's what a little over the horizon, but it's actually not that far away. And as companies gain the ability to manage and analyze and localize their data, and unlocks real-time insights in a way that they just haven't had before, it can drive expanded engagement and automation in close proximity to the end point devices and customers. And none of that happens without the telco providers and the infrastructure that they own being on board and providing the capabilities for developers like me to take advantage of the infrastructure that they've put in place. So, my perspective on it is, that transformation, that digital transformation, is not going to happen on its own. Someone's got to provision the infrastructure, someone's got to write the code, someone's got to get the services as close to my cell tower or to the Edge as possible and so, that's one of the reasons that when we ask decision makers in the telco space about their priorities from a business perspective, what they tell us is, one of their top three priorities is, we need to improve our ability to innovate and the other two are, we need to grow our revenue and we need to improve our product and services. What's going on from a software perspective in the telco space, is set to make all three of those possible, from my perspective. >> You know, Steve, Jeffrey just unpacked an awful lot there, did a really nice job of that. So, let's talk about first off, that telco relationship IBM's had, or has. You work with data, the 10 largest communication service providers in the world, and I'm sure you're on this journey with them, right? They've been telling you about their challenges and you recognize their needs. This is, you have had maybe some specific examples of that dialogue, that has progressed as your relationship has matured and you provide a different service to them. What are they telling you? What did they tell you say, '' This is where we have got to get better. We've got to get a little sharper, a little leaner.'' And then how did IBM respond to that? >> Yeah, I mean, critical to what Jeffrey just shared is under the covers. You know, 5G is going to take five times the cost that 4G took to deploy. So, if you're a telco, you have to get much more efficient. You have to drive a much more effective TCO into cost of deploying and managing and running that network architecture. When the network becomes a software defined platform, it opens up the opportunity to use open source, open technology, and to drive a tremendous ecosystem of innovation that you can then capture that value onto that open software network. And as the Edge emerged as compute and storage and connectivity, both to the Edge as Jeffrey described, then the opportunity to deliver B2B use cases to take advantage of the latency improvements with 5G, take advantage of the bandwidth capabilities that you have moving video and AI out to the Edge, so, you can create insights as a service. These are the underlying transformations that the telcos are making right now to capture this value. And in fact, we have an institute for business value on our website. You can see some of the surveys and analysis we've done but 84% of the telco clients say, you know, '' Improving the automation and the intelligence of this network platform becomes critical.'' So, from our standpoint, we see a tremendous opportunity to create an open architecture to allow the telcos to regain control of their architecture so that they can pick the solutions and services that work best for them to create value for their customers and then allows them to deploy them incredibly quickly. In fact, just this last week, we announced a milestone with Bharti, a project that we're doing in India, already has over 300 million subscribers. We've taken their ability to deploy their run environment, one of the core domains of the network, where you actually do the access over the cell towers. We've improved that from weeks down to a few days. In fact, our objective is to get to a few minutes. Applying that kind of automation dramatically improves the kind of service they can deliver. When we talk about relationships we have with Vodafone, AT$T, Verizon, about working with them on their mobile Edge compute platforms, it will allow them to extend their network. In fact, with our cloud announcement that you highlighted at the top, we announced a capability called the IBM Cloud Satellite and what IBM Cloud Satellite does is, it's built with Red Hat, so, it's open architecture, it takes advantage of the millions and millions of upstream developers, that are developing every single day to build a foundational shift architecture that allows us to deploy these services so quickly and we can move that capability right now to the Edge. What that means for a telco, is they can deploy those services wherever they want to deploy them, on their private infrastructure or on a public cloud, on a customer's premise, that gives them the flexibility. The automation allows them to do it smartly and very quickly and then in partnering with clients, they can create new end Edge services, things like, you know, manufacturing 4.0 you may have heard of or as you mentioned, advanced healthcare services. Every single industry is going to take advantage of these changes and we're really excited about the opportunity to work in combination with the telcos and speed the pace of innovation in the market. >> Jeffrey, I'd like to go back to the Bharti there. I was going to get into it a little bit later but Steve brought it up. This major Indian CSP, as you mentioned, 300 million subs, 400 million around the world. What does that say to you in terms of its commitment and its, the needs that are being addressed and how it's going to fundamentally change the way it is doing business as far as setting the pace in the telecom industry? >> Well, I think, one of the things that highlights it is, you know, this isn't just a U.S phenomenon or a European phenomenon. Indeed, in some cases we're seeing countries outside the U.S in advance, moving faster, Switzerland, as an example. We expect 90% of the population in Germany to be covered by 5G By 2025, we expect 90% of the population in South Korea to be covered by 2026, 160 million connections in in China as well. So, in some ways, what's happening in the telco world is mirroring what has happened in the public cloud world, which is the world's gone flat. And that's great from a developer perspective because that means that I don't have to learn specialized technologies or specialized services, in order to look at these network infrastructure platforms as part of the addressable surface that I have. That's one of the things that I think has always held the larger developer population back and has kept them from taking advantage of the telco networks. Is, they've always been bit of a black box to the vast majority of developers, you know, IP goes in, IP comes out but that's about all the control I have, unless I want to go and dig deep into those, you know, industry specific specifications. I was cleaning out my office last week because I'm in the process of moving and I came across my '' IMS Explained Handbook from 2006,'' and I remember going deep into that because, you know, we were told that that's going to make it so that IT infrastructure and telco infrastructure is going to converge and it did to a little bit, but not in a way that all the developers out there could really take advantage of telco infrastructure. And then I remember the next thing was like, well, '' Java Amiens on the front end with mobile clients, that's going to make everything different and we're going to be able to build apps everywhere.'' What ended up being was we would write once and test everywhere, across all the different devices that we had to support. And you know, what really drove you equity? Was the iPhone and apps that we could use HTML like technology or that we could use Java to build and it exploded. And we got millions of applications on the front end of the network. What I see potentially happening now, is the same thing on the backend infrastructure side, because the reality is for any developer that is trying to build modern applications, that's trying to take advantage of cloud native technologies, things start with containers and specifically, OCI compliant containers. That is the basis for how we think about building services and handing them off to operators to run them for us. And with what's going on here, by building on top of OpenShift, you take that, you know, essentially de facto standard of containers as the way that we communicate on the infrastructure side globally, from a software development perspective and you make that the entry point for developers into the modern telco outcome system. And so, basically, it means that if I want to push all the way out to the Edge and I want to get as close as I possibly can, as long as I can give you a container to execute that capability, I'm well on the way to making that a reality, that's a game changer in my opinion. >> Yeah, I was on. >> Just to pick it, just if I could, just to pick up on that because I think Jeffrey made a really important point. So, it's kind of like, in a way, an auntie to the ball here is this open architecture because it empowers the entire ecosystem and it allows the telcos to take advantage of enormous innovation that's happening in the marketplace. And that's why, you know, the 35 ecosystem partners that we announced when we announced the IBM Cloud for telco, that's why they're so important because it allows you to have choice. But the other piece, which he hinted at, I wanted to just underscore, is today, in it kind of the first wave of cloud, only about 20% of the applications move to cloud. They were mostly funny digital applications. In fact, we moved our funny digital applications as well into Watson, we have over 1.5 billion customers of telcos today around the world that can access Watson, through our various chatbot and call center or an agent assist solutions we've deployed. But the 80% of applications that haven't moved yet, haven't moved because it's tough to move them, because they're mission critical, they need, you know, regulatory controls, they have to have world-class security, they need to be able to provide data sovereignty as you're operating in different countries around the world and you have to make sure that you have the data in places that you need, these are the attributes, that kind of open up the opportunity for all these other workloads to move. And those are the exact kind of capabilities that we've built into the IBM Cloud for telco, so that we can enable telcos to move their applications into this environment safely, securely, and do it, as Jeffrey described, on an open architecture that gives them that agility and flexibility. And we're seeing it happen real time, you know, I'll just give you another quick example, Vodafone India, their CTO has said publicly and moving to this cloud architecture, he sees it as a universal cloud architecture, so, they're going to run not just their internal it workloads, not just their network services, their voice data and multimedia network services workloads, but also their B2B enterprise workloads, as Jeffrey was starting to describe. Those workloads that are going to move out to the Edge. And by being able to run on a common platform, he's said publicly that they're seeing an 80% improvement in their CapEx, a 50% improvement in their OPEX, and then 90% improvement in the cost to get productions and services deployed. So, the ability to embrace this open architecture and to have the underlying capabilities and attributes in a cloud platform that responds to the specific needs of telco and enterprise workloads, we think is a really powerful combination. >> Steve, the ecosystem, Jeffrey, you brought it up as well. So, I'd like, just to give you a moment to talk about that a little bit, not a small point, by any means you have nearly 40 partners lined up in this respect, from a hardware vendor, software vendors, SAS providers. I mean, it's a pretty impressive lineup and what kind of a statement is that in your, from your perspective, that you're making to the marketplace when you bring that kind of breadth and depth, that kind of bench, basically the game? >> From our view, it's exciting, and we're only getting started. I mean, we literally have not made the announcement, just a matter of a couple of months ago, and every day that passes, we have additional partners that see the power in joining this open architecture approach that we've put in place. The reason that it delivers such values for all the players, you know, one of the hallmarks of a platform approach is that for every player that joins the platform, it brings value to all the players on the cloud. So as we build this ecosystem and we take the leverage of the open source community, and we build on the power of OpenShift and containers, as Jeffrey was saying, we're creating momentum in the marketplace and back to my very first point I made, when the market's moving really quickly, you've got to be agile. And to be agile in today's market, you have to infuse automation at scale, you have to infuse security at scale and you have to infuse intelligence at scale. And that's exactly what we can help the telcos do, and do it in partnership with these enterprise clients. Instinctively >> One of the values of that is that, you know, we're seeing the larger trend in the cloud native space of folks that used to build packaged software services, is essentially taking advantage of these architectural capabilities and containerizing their applications as part of their future strategy. I mean, just two weeks ago, Salesforce basically said, we're reinvisioning Salesforce as a set of containerized workloads that we deliver, SAP is going in very much the same direction. So as you think about these business workloads, where you get data coming from the infrastructure and you want to go all the way back to the back office and you want to make sure that data gets updated in your supply chain management system, being able to do that with a consistent architecture makes these integration challenges just an order of magnitude easier. I actually want to drill in on that data point for a minute because I think that that's also key to understanding what's going on here, because, you know, during the early days of the public cloud and even WebDuo before that, one of the things that drove WebDuo was the idea that data is the new Intel inside and in some ways that was around centralized data because we had 40 or 50 years to get all the data into the data centers and into the, and then put it in the public cloud. But that's not what is happening today. So much of the new data is actually originating at the Edge and increasingly it needs to stay at the Edge if for no other reason than to make sure that the folks that are trying to use it well aren't running up huge ingestion costs, trying to move it all back to the public cloud providers, analyze it and then push it back out and do that within the realm of the laws of physics. So, you know, one of the big things that's driving the Edge is, in the move toward the Edge, and the interest in 5G is that allows us to do more with data where the data originates. So, as an example, a manufacturer that I've been working with that basically came across exactly that problem, as they stood up more and more connected devices, they were seeing their data ingestion volume spiking and kind of running ahead of their budgets for data ingestion but they were like, well, we can't just leave this data and discard it at the Edge, because what happens if it turns out to be valuable for the maintenance, preventative maintenance use cases that we want to run, or for the machine wear characteristics that we want to run. So, we need to find a way to get our models out close to the data so we don't have to bring it all back to the core. In retailing, personalization is something that a lot of folks are looking at right now and even clientelling and that's, again, another situation where you want to get the data close to where the customer actually lives from a geographic basis and into the hands of the person that's in the store but you don't want to necessarily have to go and install a lot of complex hardware in the retail outlet because then somebody has to manage, you know, those servers and manage all those capabilities. So, you know, in the case of the retailer that I was working with, what they wanted was to get that capability as close as possible to the store, but no closer. And the idea of essentially a virtual back office that they could stand up whenever they opened up a new retail outlet, or even had a franchisee open up an outlet, was an extremely powerful concept and that's the kind of thing that you can do when you're saying,'' Well it's just a set of containers and if I have a, you know, essentially a control plane that I deploy it to, then I can do that on top of that telco provider that they sign up to be a strategic services provider.'' There are lots of other interesting scenarios, tourism, if you think about, you know, the tourist economies that we have around the world and the data that, you know, mobile devices throw off that let us get anonymized information about who's coming, where they're going, what they're spending, how long they're staying, there's a huge set of data there that you can use to grow revenue. You know, other types of use cases, transportation? We see, you know, municipal governments kind of looking at how they can use anonymized data around commute patterns to impact their planning. That's all data that's coming from the the telco infrastructure. >> You know, when we're talking about these massive advantages, right, as this hybrid cloud approach about skill ones, build one's, easy management, efficient management, all of these things, Steve, I think we almost, we'd be derelict to duty if we didn't talk about security a little bit. Just ultimately at the end of the day, you've got to provide this as you pointed out, world-class secure environment. And so, in terms of the hybrid approach, what kind of considerations do you have to make that are special to that and that are being deployed and have been considered >> You know, that's a great point. One of the benefits to Comms from moving to an open architecture, is that you componentize the framework of that architecture, and you have suppliers supplying applications for the various different services that we just talked through. And the ability then to integrate security is essentially a foundational element to the entire Premack architecture. We've stayed very compliant with the Nanci framework architecture and the way that we've worked with the telcos and bringing forth a solution, because we specifically want them to have the choice but how is that choice being married with the kind of security you just talked about. And to Jeffrey's point, you know, when you move those applications out to the Edge and that data, you know, many of the analysts are saying now by 2025, as much as 75% of the data created in the world will happen at the Edge. So, this is a massive shift. And when that shift occurs, you have to have the security to make sure that you're going to take care of that data in the way that it should be and that meets all regulatory, you know, governance already rules and regulations. So, that becomes really critical. The other piece though, is just the amount of value that gets created. The reason that data is at the Edge is because now you can act on it at the Edge, you can extract insights and in fact, most of the analysts will say,'' In the next three years, we'll see $675 billion of new value created at the Edge with these kinds of applications.'' And going back on the manufacturing example, I mean, we're already working today with manufacturers and they already had, you know, hundreds of IOT sensors deployed in the factory and we have an Edge application manager that extends right out to the far Edge, if you will, right out onto that factory floor to help get intelligence from those devices. But now think about adding to that the AI capabilities, the video capabilities, watching that manufacturing line to make sure every product that comes off that line is absolutely perfect, Watching the employees to make sure they're staying in safety zones, you know, watching the actual equipment itself to make sure it is performing the way it's supposed to, maybe using an analytics and AI capabilities to predict, you know, issues that might arise before they even happen, so you can take preventative action. This kind of intelligence, you know, makes the business run smarter, faster, more effective. So, that's where we see tremendous service. So, it's not just the fact that data will be created and it will be higher fidelity data to include the analytics, AI, you don't include unstructured data like video data and image data, audio data, but the ability to then extract insights and value out of it. And this is why we believe the ecosystem we talked about earlier, our partnership with the telco's and the ability to bring ecosystem partners and they can add value is just a tremendous momentum that we're going to build. >> Well, the market opportunity is certainly great. As you pointed out, a lot of additional value yet to be created, significant value and obviously, a lot of money to be spent as well by telcos, by some estimates, a hundred billion plus, just by the year 2022 and getting this new software defined platforms up and running. So, congratulations to IBM for this launch and we wish you continued success, Steve, in that endeavor and thank you for your time and Jeffrey, thank you as well for your insights from Forester. >> Always a pleasure. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Dec 16 2020

SUMMARY :

all around the world. and it's changing the way industries So, he's the Principal Analyst It's great to be here. the overarching question is, is that the rate and pace of change in the telecom space? and the other two are, we and you recognize their needs. and AI out to the Edge, What does that say to you and it did to a little and it allows the telcos to take advantage that kind of bench, basically the game? that see the power and the data that, you know, that are special to that and the ability to and we wish you continued success, Steve, Always a pleasure.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
StevePERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

VodafoneORGANIZATION

0.99+

Steve CanepaPERSON

0.99+

VerizonORGANIZATION

0.99+

GermanyLOCATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

John WallsPERSON

0.99+

IndiaLOCATION

0.99+

December 2020DATE

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

$675 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

ChinaLOCATION

0.99+

40QUANTITY

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

South KoreaLOCATION

0.99+

90%QUANTITY

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

millionsQUANTITY

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

U.SLOCATION

0.99+

Vodafone IndiaORGANIZATION

0.99+

84%QUANTITY

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

2025DATE

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

50 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

BhartiORGANIZATION

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

five timesQUANTITY

0.99+

hundredsQUANTITY

0.99+

JavaTITLE

0.99+

SASORGANIZATION

0.99+

IMS Explained HandbookTITLE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

AT$TORGANIZATION

0.99+

5GORGANIZATION

0.99+

300 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

ForresterORGANIZATION

0.99+

SwitzerlandLOCATION

0.99+

400 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

EdgeORGANIZATION

0.99+

two weeks agoDATE

0.98+

2022DATE

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

WatsonTITLE

0.98+

35 ecosystem partnersQUANTITY

0.98+

2006DATE

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

over 300 million subscribersQUANTITY

0.98+

2026DATE

0.98+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.98+

over 1.5 billion customersQUANTITY

0.98+

Jeffrey Hammond, Forrester | DevOps Virtual Forum 2020


 

>> Narrator: From around the globe, it's theCUBE! With digital coverage of DevOps Virtual Forum, brought to you by Broadcom. >> Hi, Lisa Martin here covering the Broadcom DevOps Virtual Forum. I'm very pleased to be joined today by a CUBE alumni, Jeffrey Hammond, the Vice President and Principal Analyst serving CIOs at Forrester. Jeffrey, nice to talk with you today. >> Good morning, it's good to be here. >> So, a virtual forum, a great opportunity to engage with our audiences. So much has changed in the last, it's an understatement, right? Or it's an overstated thing, but it's obvious. So much has changed. When we think of DevOps, one of the things that we think of is speed, enabling organizations to be able to better serve customers or adapt to changing markets like we're in now. Speaking of the need to adapt, talk to us about what you're seeing with respect to DevOps and Agile in the age of COVID. What are things looking like? >> Yeah, I think that for most organizations, we're in a period of adjustment. When we initially started, it was essentially a sprint. You run as hard as you can for as fast as you can for as long as you can and you just kind of power through it. And that's actually what the folks at GitHub saw in May, when they run an analysis of how developers commit times and level of work that they were committing and how they were working. In the first couple months of COVID, was progressing, they found that developers, at least in the Pacific Time Zone, were actually increasing their work volume, maybe 'cause they didn't have two hour commutes, or maybe because they work stuck away in their homes, but for whatever reason, they were doing more work. And it's almost like, if you've ever run a marathon, the first mile or two in the marathon, you feel great, you just want to run and you want to power through it, you want to go hard. And if you do that, by the time you get to mile 18 or 19, you're going to be gassed, sucking for wind. And that's I think where we're starting to hit. So as we start to gear our development shops up for the reality that most of us won't be returning into an office until 2021 at the earliest. And many organizations will be fundamentally changing their remote work policies, we have to make sure that the agile processes that we use, and the DevOps processes and tools that we use to support these teams are essentially aligned to help developers run that marathon, instead of just kind of power through. So, let me give you a couple specifics. For many organizations, they have been in an environment where they will tolerate remote work and what I would call remote work around the edges, like developers can be remote, but product managers and essentially scrum masters and all the administrators that are running the SCM repositories and the DevOps pipelines are all in the office. And it's essentially centralized work. That's not where we are anymore. We're moving from remote workers at the edge to remote workers at the center of what we do. And so, one of the implications of that is that we have to think about all the activities that you need to do from a DevOps perspective, or from an agile perspective. They have to be remotable. One of the things I found with some of the organizations I talked to early on was, there were things that administrators had to do that required them to go into the office, to reboot the SCM server as an example, or to make sure that the final approvals for production were made. And so, the code could be moved into the production environment. And so, it actually was a little bit difficult because they had to get specific approval from the HR organizations to actually be allowed to go into the office in some states. And so, one of the the results of that is that, while we've traditionally said tools are important, but they're not as important as culture, as structure, as organization, as process, I think we have to rethink that a little bit. Because to the extent that tools enable us to be more digitally organized and to achieve higher levels of digitization in our processes, and be able to support the idea of remote workers in the center. They're now on an equal footing with so many of the other levers that organizations have at their disposal. I'll give you another example. For years, we've said that the key to success with Agile at the team level is cross functional, co-located teams that are working together. Physically co-located. It's the easiest way to show agile success. We can't do that anymore. We can't be physically located at least for the foreseeable future. So, how do you take the low hanging fruits of an agile transformation and apply it in the time of COVID? Well, I think what you have to do is you have to look at what physical co-location has enabled in the past and understand that it's not so much the fact that we're together looking at each other across the table, it's the fact that we're able to get into a shared mind space. From a measurement perspective, we can have shared purpose, we can engage in high bandwidth communications. It's the spiritual aspect of that physical co-location that is actually important. So, one of the biggest things that organizations need to start to ask themselves is, how do we achieve spiritual co-location with our Agile teams, because we don't have the ease of physical co-location available to us anymore. >> Well, spiritual co-location is such an interesting kind of provocative phrase there, but something that probably was a challenge. Here we are seven, eight months in, for many organizations as you say, going from physical workspaces, co-location, being able to collaborate face to face to a light switch flip overnight, and this undefined indeterminate period of time where all we were living with was uncertainty. How does spiritual... When you talk about spiritual co-location in terms of collaboration and processes and technology. Help us unpack that and how are you seeing organizations adopt it? >> Yeah, it's a great question. And I think it goes to the very root of how organizations are trying to transform themselves to be more agile and to embrace DevOps. If you go all the way back to the original Agile Manifesto. There were four principles that were espoused. Individuals and interactions over processes and tools. That's still important, individuals and interactions are at the core of software development. Processes and tools that support those individuals in those interactions are more important than ever. Working software over comprehensive documentation. Working software is still more important. But when you are trying to onboard employees, and they can't come into the office, and they can't do the two day training session, and kind of understand how things work, and they can't just holler over theCUBE, to ask a question, you may need to invest a little bit more in documentation to help that onboarding process be successful in a remote context. Customer collaboration over contract negotiation. Absolutely still important. But employee collaboration is equally as important if you want to be spiritually co-located and if you want to have a shared purpose. And then, responding to change over following a plan. I think one of the things that's happened in a lot of organizations is we have focused so much of our DevOps effort around velocity. Getting faster, we need to run as fast as we can. Like that sprinter, okay? Trying to just power through it as quickly as possible. But as we shift to the marathon way of thinking, velocity is still important but agility becomes even more important. So when you have to create an application in three weeks to do track and trace for your employees, agility is more important than just flat out velocity. And so, changing some of the ways that we think about DevOps practices is important to make sure that that agility is there. For one thing, you have to defer decisions as far down the chain to the team level as possible. So those teams have to be empowered to make decisions. Because you can't have a program level meeting of six or seven teams in one large hall and say, here's the lay of the land, here's what we're going to do, here are our processes, and here are our guardrails. Those teams have to make decisions much more quickly. The developers are actually developing code in smaller chunks of flow. They have to be able to take two hours here, or 50 minutes there and do something useful. And so, the tools that support us have to become tolerant of the reality of how we're working. So, if they work in a way that it allows the team together to take as much autonomy as they can handle, to allow them to communicate in a way that delivers shared purpose, and allows them to adapt and master new technologies, then they're in the zone, they'll get spiritually connected. I hope that makes sense (chuckles). >> It does, I think we all could use some of that. But you talked about in the beginning and I've talked to numerous companies during the pandemic on theCUBE about the productivity or rather the number of hours worked has gone way up for many roles, and times that they normally at late at night on the weekends. So, but it's a cultural, it's a mind shift. To your point about DevOps focused on velocity, sprint, sprint, sprint, and now we have to. So that cultural shift is not an easy one for developers and even the biz folks to flip so quickly. What have you seen in terms of the velocity at which businesses are able to get more of that balance between the velocity, the sprint and the agility? >> I think at the core, this really comes down to management sensitivity. When everybody was in the office, you could kind of see the mental health of development teams by watching how they work, you can call it management by walking around, right? We can't do that, managers have to be more aware of what their teams are doing, because they're not going to see that developer doing a check in at 9:00 p.m. on a Friday, because that's what they had to do to meet the objectives. And they're going to have to find new ways to measure engagement and also potential burnout. A friend of mine once had a great metric that he called the Parking Lot Metric. It was helpful as the parking lot at nine and helpful was it at five. And that gives you an indication of how engaged your developers are. What's the digital equivalent of the Parking Lot Metric in the time of COVID, it's commit stats, it's commit rates, it's the turn rate that we have in our code. So we have this information, we may not be collecting it, but then the next question becomes how do we use that information? Do we use that information to say, well, this team isn't delivering at the same level of productivity as another team? Do we weaponize that data? Or do we use that data to identify impedances in the process? Why isn't a team working effectively? Is it because they have higher levels of family obligations, and they've got kids that are at home? Is it because they're working with hardware technology, and guess what, it's not easy to get the hardware technology into their home office, because it's in the lab, at the corporate office. Or they're trying to communicate halfway around the world. And they're communicating with an office lab that is also shut down. And the bandwidth just doesn't enable the level of high bandwidth communications. So, from a DevOps perspective, managers have to get much more sensitive to the exhaust that the DevOps tools are throwing off, but also how they're going to use that in a constructive way to prevent burnout. And then they also need to, if they're not already managing, or monitoring or measuring the level of developer engagement they have, they really need to start. Whether that's surveys around developer satisfaction, whether it's more regular social events where developers can kind of just get together and drink a beer and talk about what's going on in the project and monitoring who checks in and who doesn't. They have to work harder, I think than they ever have before. >> Well, and you mentioned burnout. And that's something that I think we've all faced in this time at varying levels, and it changes and it's a real, there's a tension in the air regardless of where you are. There's a challenge, as you mentioned, people having their kids as co-workers and fighting for bandwidth, because everyone is forced in this situation. I'd love to get your perspective on some businesses that have done this, well, this adaptation. What can you share in terms of some real world examples that might inspire the audience? >> Yeah, I'll start with Stack Overflow. They recently published a piece in the Journal of the ACM around some of the things that they had discovered. First of all, just a cultural philosophy. If one person is remote, everybody is remote. And you just think that way from the executive level. Social spaces, one of the things that they talk about doing is leaving the video conference room open at the team level all day long. And the team members will go on mute, so that they don't have to, that they don't necessarily have to be there with somebody else listening to them. But if they have a question, they can just pop off mute really quickly and ask the question and if anybody else knows the answer, it's kind of like being in that virtual pod, if you will. Even here at Forrester, one of the things that we've done is we've invested in social ceremonies. We've actually moved our team meetings on my analyst team from once every two weeks to weekly. And we have built more time in for socialization, just so we can see how we're doing. I think Microsoft has really made some good information available in how they've managed things like the onboarding process. I think Amanda Silver over there mentioned that a couple of weeks ago, a presentation they did that Microsoft's onboarded over 150,000 people since the start of COVID. If you don't have good remote onboarding processes, that's going to be a disaster. Now, they're not all developers, but if you think about it, everything from how you do the interviewing process, to how you get people their badges, to how they get their equipment. Security is another issue that they called out. Typically, IT security, security of developers machines, ends at the corporate desktop. But now since we're increasingly using our own machines, our own hardware, security organization's going to have to extend their security policies to cover employee devices. And that's caused them to scramble a little bit. So, the examples are out there. It's not a lot of like, we have to do everything completely differently. But it's a lot of subtle changes that have to be made. I'll give you another example. One of the things that we are seeing is that more and more organizations to deal with the challenges around agility with respect to delivering software and embracing low code tools. In fact, we see about 50% of firms are using low code tools right now, we predict it's going to be 75% by the end of next year. So, figuring out how your DevOps processes support an organization that might be using Mendix or OutSystems, or the Power Platform, building the front end of an application, like a track and trace application really, really quickly. But then hooking it up to your back end infrastructure. Does that happen completely outside the DevOps investments that you're making? And the agile processes that you're making? Or do you adapt your organization. Are hybrid teams now, teams that not just have professional developers, but also have business users that are doing some development with a low code tool. Those are the kinds of things that we have to be willing to entertain in order to shift the focus a little bit more toward the agility side, I think. >> A lot of obstacles but also a lot of opportunities for businesses to really learn, pay attention here, pivot and grow and hopefully some good opportunities for the developers and the business folks to just get better at what they're doing and learning to embrace spiritual co-location. Jeffrey, thank you so much for joining us on the program today, very insightful conversation. >> It's my pleasure, it's an important thing. Just remember, if you're going to run that marathon, break it into 26, 10 minute runs, take a walk break in between each, and you'll find that you'll get there. >> Digestible components, wise advice. Jeffrey Hammond, thank you so much for joining. For Jeffrey, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching Broadcom's DevOps Virtual Forum. (bright upbeat music)

Published Date : Nov 20 2020

SUMMARY :

brought to you by Broadcom. Jeffrey, nice to talk with you today. Speaking of the need to adapt, that the key to success being able to collaborate face to face as far down the chain to and I've talked to numerous that the DevOps tools are throwing off, that might inspire the audience? One of the things that we are seeing and learning to embrace going to run that marathon, you so much for joining.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

26QUANTITY

0.99+

MayDATE

0.99+

two hourQUANTITY

0.99+

two hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

50 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

BroadcomORGANIZATION

0.99+

sevenQUANTITY

0.99+

Amanda SilverPERSON

0.99+

9:00 p.m.DATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

GitHubORGANIZATION

0.99+

two dayQUANTITY

0.99+

three weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

10 minuteQUANTITY

0.99+

Agile ManifestoTITLE

0.99+

over 150,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

first mileQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.98+

ForresterORGANIZATION

0.98+

eight monthsQUANTITY

0.98+

Pacific Time ZoneLOCATION

0.98+

seven teamsQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.98+

CUBEORGANIZATION

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

Journal of the ACMTITLE

0.97+

one thingQUANTITY

0.96+

first couple monthsQUANTITY

0.96+

eachQUANTITY

0.95+

about 50%QUANTITY

0.95+

one personQUANTITY

0.95+

fiveDATE

0.95+

FridayDATE

0.94+

mile 18QUANTITY

0.92+

pandemicEVENT

0.92+

DevOpsTITLE

0.92+

Parking Lot MetricOTHER

0.91+

agileTITLE

0.91+

end of next yearDATE

0.91+

FirstQUANTITY

0.9+

2020DATE

0.89+

OutSystemsORGANIZATION

0.89+

COVIDEVENT

0.87+

one largeQUANTITY

0.86+

AgileTITLE

0.85+

nineDATE

0.84+

Stack OverflowORGANIZATION

0.84+

couple of weeks agoDATE

0.83+

19QUANTITY

0.82+

COVIDOTHER

0.82+

once every two weeksQUANTITY

0.75+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.74+

four principlesQUANTITY

0.71+

COVIDTITLE

0.64+

DevOps Virtual ForumTITLE

0.61+

MendixORGANIZATION

0.58+

AgileORGANIZATION

0.53+

PresidentPERSON

0.51+

Jeffrey Hammond, Forrester | DevOps Virtual Forum Promo


 

>>Yeah. Hey, welcome back. Friday, Jeffrey here with the Cube, come to you from our Palo Alto studios today, talking about event that we're gonna have in November. It's pretty exciting. And to talk about it and give us a little bit of a preview, we're joined in the segment by Jeffrey Hammond. He's the vice president and principal analyst at Forrester. Jeffrey, great to see you. >>It's good to be here, Jeff. Thanks for having me. >>Absolutely so lot of social media memes about. You know, what's driving your digital transformation is the CEO, the CEO or CO of it, and I think we all know what the answer is. But what's what's happened is, as we've, you know, accelerated digital transformation, and we had the lights light switch moment, everybody working from home. We're now six months, eight months into this, and this is gonna be going on for a while. So specifically in the context of Dev Ops, where such a foundation of that is us getting together every morning in a room and having a quick stand up and talking about what our challenges isn't going out to develop. We have been able to do that for six months, and we're probably not gonna be able to do it for a little while longer. So how is Dev? Ops in 2021? The Age of Covert and even Post Cove? It's gonna be different from what we had say 2019. >>Yeah, Jeff. A couple years ago I wrote a piece called Designing Developer Spaces, and it was all about creating physical spaces for agile teams. Toe work in because as creative teams, they needed to have an environment that supported them. And the idea of remote working was kind of like unaudited e. You know, there was a list up on git hub of companies. It's a or did remote developers. And it was maybe 100 companies long at that point. And, you know, now you know, in in 2020 every company is a remote development company. And so all those investments in physical spaces to support cross functional co located teams aren't something that we're able to take advantage of today, and as a result, it's forcing companies Thio become even more disciplined with respect to the things that they do to help development teams work together. It's enforcing them to to, you know, focus on what I would call spiritual co location, because physical co location is no longer an option. And you can't do that without having and even higher attention toe automation on Dev ops practices that enable it, but also an increased focus on enabling digital collaboration, moving from things like the physical con bond wall that you put index cards on onto tools that help you replicate that sort of capability. But do it in a digital world when you have 100% remote developers, right, >>right, so so just begs a lot of questions. You know? What should people be measuring? How should they be measuring? I mean, we have all kinds of measurement tools, and obviously the devolves process is continuous thing that's happening every day, pushing out new releases every day. How dio the managers kind of rethink about how they're measuring outcomes. I don't wanna say success because it's really outcomes and not activity. >>Yeah, it's a really timely question, Jeff. You know, I've been getting a lot of questions from from large enterprise development shops about Well, how doe I make sure that my employees are still productive now that I can't see them. Should I be measuring individual productivity? You know my answers. You know, I don't think so. You really want to be able Thio? You really want to be able Thio measure the team level, But you may want to allow individuals to begin toe look at their own productivity metrics and benchmarks themselves because they can't see the person next to them in the other desk or have that conversation and know that they're doing a good job. So the way that managers works changes significantly. Andi. That's one of the things that we'll talk about in November, >>right? And I'm just curious. How much stuff can we pull from? Generic leadership is well, because it's the same situation. I love your I love your concept of spiritual alignment that's also got to come not only from the Dev Ops team, but from all the senior leadership now who don't necessarily have the opportunity to reinforce those messages in the hallway or whatever the kind of the normal communication channels that they used before. But this this is well beyond Dev ops, but really, you know, leadership in general, I would say, >>Yeah, it comes down to data collaboration and shared vision. You know, those principles are not unique to software development, but they're extremely important for any type of creative work. And and that's what software development is. So we can learn a lot from from from from the businesses, the whole. But then we need to apply it specifically in the process and context of developing software. And that's where Dev Ops creates the link to enable that happened. >>Yeah, really? An interesting kind of fork in the road, if you will. Dev Ops has been around for 20 some odd years. Fundamental change in the way software respect and built and delivered. But as you said, I mean, even by definition, um, cross functional co located teams simply aren't enabled today and probably won't be for a little while longer. So I think this is probably, ah, lot of information that people are really excited to hear. >>Yeah, especially because we're now out of the sprint phase. We're moving into a marathon. We're gonna have to deal with this for probably at least the next 8 to 12 months. So we've got to start thinking differently for the long term and and and how we keep our employees productive. But we also keep them happy and make sure that they aren't burning out so that they're developing great software. That really matters. >>Yeah, that's great. Well, thanks for the little tease we look forward to getting. Ah, a lot more meat in this topic and diving in in November. So, Jeffrey, Thanks for stopping by and again. His Dev Ops Virtual Form, November 18th, 11 a.m. Eastern 80 and Pacific. Jeffrey, we'll see you there. >>Can't wait. It'll be a lot of, um >>Alright. He's Jeffrey. I'm Jeff. You're watching the Cube, So get ready. Mark your calendars for November. It's the Dev Ops Virtual Forum. Um, November 18 11 a.m. Eastern eight, Pacific Sea There. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Oct 30 2020

SUMMARY :

come to you from our Palo Alto studios today, talking about event that we're gonna have in November. It's good to be here, Jeff. CEO, the CEO or CO of it, and I think we all know what the answer is. It's enforcing them to to, you know, focus on what I would call How dio the managers kind of rethink about how they're measuring You really want to be able Thio measure the team level, But you may want to allow individuals But this this is well beyond Dev ops, but really, you know, leadership in general, Yeah, it comes down to data collaboration and shared vision. An interesting kind of fork in the road, if you will. We're gonna have to deal with this for probably at least the next 8 to 12 months. Well, thanks for the little tease we look forward to getting. It'll be a lot of, um It's the Dev Ops Virtual Forum.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

November 18thDATE

0.99+

eight monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

NovemberDATE

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

100 companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

FridayDATE

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.98+

ForresterORGANIZATION

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

ThioPERSON

0.95+

Dev OpsTITLE

0.95+

Pacific SeaLOCATION

0.95+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.92+

November 18 11 a.m. EasternDATE

0.87+

DevOps VirtualORGANIZATION

0.83+

12 monthsQUANTITY

0.83+

couple years agoDATE

0.82+

ThioORGANIZATION

0.8+

Post CoveTITLE

0.8+

of CovertTITLE

0.79+

AndiPERSON

0.73+

8QUANTITY

0.72+

Dev Ops VirtualORGANIZATION

0.71+

11 a.m. Eastern 80DATE

0.61+

PacificLOCATION

0.58+

odd yearsQUANTITY

0.53+

eightLOCATION

0.53+

CubePERSON

0.45+

Jeffrey Hammond, Forrester | DevOps Virtual Forum


 

>>Hey, welcome back Friday, Jeffrey here with the Cube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today, talking about event that we're gonna have in November. It's pretty exciting. And to talk about it and give us a little bit of a preview, we're joined in the segment by Jeffrey Hammond. He's the vice president and principal analyst at Forrester. Jeffrey, great to see you. >>It's good to be here, Jeff. Thanks for having me. >>Absolutely so lot of social media memes about. You know, what's driving your digital transformation is the CEO, the CEO or CO of it, and I think we all know what the answer is. But what's what's happened is, as we've, you know, accelerated digital transformation, and we had the lights light switch moment, everybody working from home. We're now six months, eight months into this, and this is gonna be going on for a while. So specifically in the context of Dev Ops, where such a foundation of that is us getting together every morning in a room and having a quick stand up and talking about what our challenges isn't going out to develop. We have been able to do that for six months, and we're probably not gonna be able to do it for a little while longer. So how is Dev? Ops in 2021? The Age of Covert and even Post Cove is gonna be different from what we had say, 2019. >>Yeah, Jeff. A couple years ago I wrote a piece called Designing Developer Spaces. And it was all about creating physical spaces for agile teams. Toe work in because as creative teams, they needed to have an environment that supported them. And the idea of remote working was kind of like unaudited e. You know, there was a list up on git hub of of companies that supported remote developers. And it was maybe 100 companies long at that point. And, you know, now you know, in 2020 every company is a remote development company. And so all those investments in physical spaces, too, for cross functional co located teams aren't something that we're able to take advantage of today, and as a result, it's forcing companies Thio become even more disciplined with respect to the things that they do to help development teams work together. It's enforcing them to to, you know, focus on what I would call spiritual co location because physical co location is no longer an option. And you can't do that without having and even higher attention toe automation on Dev ops practices that enable it, but also an increased focus on enabling digital collaboration. Moving from things like the physical con bond wall that you put index cards on onto tools that help you replicate that sort of capability. But do it in a digital world when you have 100% remote developers, right? >>Right, so so just begs a lot of questions. You know? What should people be measuring? How should they be measuring? I mean, we have all kinds of measurement tools, and obviously the devolves process is continuous thing that's happening every day, pushing out new releases every day. How dio the managers kind of rethink about how they're measuring outcomes. I don't wanna say success because it's really outcomes and not activity. >>Yeah, it's a really timely question, Jeff. You know, I've been getting a lot of questions from from large enterprise development shops about Well, how doe I make sure that my employees are still productive now that I can't see them. Should I be measuring individual productivity? You know my answers. You know, I don't think so. You really want to be able Thio? You really want to be able Thio measure the team level, But you may want to allow individuals to begin toe look at their own productivity metrics and benchmarks themselves because they can't see the person next to them in the other desk or have that conversation and know that they're doing a good job. So the way that managers works changes significantly. Andi. That's one of the things that we'll talk about in November, >>right? And I'm just curious. How much stuff can we pull from? Generic leadership is well, because it's the same situation. I love your I love your concept of spiritual alignment that's also got to come not only from the Dev Ops team, but from all the senior leadership now who don't necessarily have the opportunity to reinforce those messages in the hallway or whatever the kind of the normal communication channels that they used before. But this this is well beyond Dev ops, but really, you know, leadership in general, I would say >>Yeah, it comes down to data collaboration and shared vision. You know, those principles were not unique to software development, but they're extremely important for any type of creative work. And and that's what software development is. So we can learn a lot from from from from the businesses, the whole. But then we need to apply it specifically in the process and context of developing software. And that's where Dev Ops creates the link to enable that happen. >>Yeah, really? An interesting kind of fork in the road, if you will. Dev Ops has been around for 20 some odd years. Fundamental change in the way software respect and built and delivered. But as you said, I mean, even by definition, um, cross functional co located teams simply aren't enabled today and probably won't be for a little while longer. So I think this is probably, ah, lot of information that people are really excited to hear. >>Yeah, especially because we're now out of the sprint phase. We're moving into a marathon. We're gonna have to deal with this for probably at least the next 8 to 12 months. So we've got to start thinking differently for the long term and and and how we keep our employees productive, but we also keep them happy and make sure that they aren't burning out so that they're developing great software. That really matters. >>Yeah, that's great. Well, thanks for the little tease we look forward to getting. Ah, a lot more meat in this topic and diving in in November. So, Jeffrey, Thanks for stopping by and again. His Dev Ops Virtual Form, November 18th, 11 a.m. Eastern 80 and Pacific. Jeffrey, we'll see you there. >>Can't wait. It'll be a lot of, um >>Alright. He's Jeffrey. I'm Jeff. You're watching the Cube, so get ready. Mark your calendars for November. It's the Dev Ops Virtual Forum. Um, November 18. 11 a.m. Eastern eight, Pacific Sea There. Thanks for watching. Yeah.

Published Date : Oct 12 2020

SUMMARY :

And to talk about it and give us a little bit of a preview, It's good to be here, Jeff. CEO, the CEO or CO of it, and I think we all know what the answer is. It's enforcing them to to, you know, focus on what I would call How dio the managers kind of rethink about how they're measuring You really want to be able Thio measure the team level, But you may want to allow individuals But this this is well beyond Dev ops, but really, you know, Yeah, it comes down to data collaboration and shared vision. An interesting kind of fork in the road, if you will. We're gonna have to deal with this for probably at least the next 8 to 12 months. Well, thanks for the little tease we look forward to getting. It'll be a lot of, um It's the Dev Ops Virtual Forum.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

November 18thDATE

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

FridayDATE

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

eight monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

NovemberDATE

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

100 companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.98+

ForresterORGANIZATION

0.98+

Dev OpsTITLE

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

Pacific SeaLOCATION

0.96+

ThioPERSON

0.96+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.93+

couple years agoDATE

0.88+

November 18. 11 a.m. EasternDATE

0.86+

12 monthsQUANTITY

0.85+

8QUANTITY

0.78+

Dev Ops Virtual ForumORGANIZATION

0.77+

ThioORGANIZATION

0.77+

11 a.m. Eastern 80DATE

0.72+

DevOps VirtualORGANIZATION

0.72+

Post CoveTITLE

0.71+

20 someQUANTITY

0.69+

CubePERSON

0.67+

PacificLOCATION

0.65+

DevORGANIZATION

0.56+

eightLOCATION

0.51+

DesigningTITLE

0.5+

SpacesTITLE

0.49+

CovertTITLE

0.4+

Mark Jeffrey, Guardian Circle | Blockchain Unbound 2018


 

>> Narrator: Live from San Juan, Puerto Rico. It's theCUBE, covering Blockchain Unbound. Brought to you by Blockchain Industries. >> Hello everyone, welcome back to our exclusive coverage of, in Puerto, Rico for Blockchain Unbound. This is the industry conference room. People around the world from Silicon Valley, New York, and around the glove, coming to Puerto, Rico to talk about Blockchain decentralized internet cryptocurrency and really the future of society and global economic value creation of course our continuing coverage is focusing La Sierra for 2018. Our next guest is Mark Jeffery, CEO and Co-Founder of a company called Guardian Circle. Welcome. >> Thank you, thanks for having me. >> So you guys are doing something really interesting, so we, first of all, we like to geek out, as Fred say, "We're alpha-geeks." But we love IoT, cloud computing. You're doing something really interesting right now with Blockchain and this new decentralized internet around something of a critical infrastructure nature. Take a minute to talk about Guardian Circle's product, the coin, token that you're doing, and what it all means. >> So, Guardium is the token, the company's called Guardian Circle. Together they comprise global decentralized emergency response. So, six billion people on earth have no 911, There's just no magic number you can call, right? So hold that in your mind for a second. The other one billion of us, we do have 911, but it's not very good, it hasn't been really updated since the 60's. If you call 911 and if you're lucky enough to not get a busy signal, they have no idea where you are. Your location information is not transmitted. Which Uber can find you more easily than 911. Which is just insane, but that is the way it is. So, nevermind, so throw all that out >> So 911 is broken? 911 is broken. >> Yep If you have it, it's broken, and most people don't have it, so throw the whole thing out the window, let's start over. What would we build today? The way the world should work is whenever you're in trouble, no matter where you are on the globe, all you should have to do is press a button, that button sends an alert up to the Cloud, the Cloud looks down and sees what people and resources are already nearby, and then activates, coordinates, pushes all that help to you as quickly as possible. So, ten people in three minutes. That's what were, that's our-- >> So a couple things going on. So to me when you say, what should we start from scratch, put in my little operating system design network solutions add on, all kind of rolled into one as a stable, fault-tolerant, resilient, robust, always on network. >> Yes. >> Database that is fully interoperable and updated in real time of every number, every location, every persons capability to understand the discovery and resolution of a number. >> Yeah, so >> So that sounds like the internet. That sounds like the internet. >> (laughs) Well that's a little bit, probably further than we're going right now, but yes. Ultimately, you're correct. That would be the ultimate-- >> So no legacy baggage, 1960's Telco. >> No >> We're talking about immobile, in Africa for instance, there's more mobile penetration than anything else. That's what they got. >> Yes. >> So every country is their own sovereign kind of architecture? >> Yes >> Are you guys looking at it from a global perspective or regional? >> Global, so we think that, I mean, this is, this thing should be mobile native, location aware, and the alert should go out to multiple parties. And the phone number is your identifier in this system, but it's effectively an IP based system, really, so you're right. We have to balance that against privacies, so you get to decide who is on your alert grid, right? So you have to emphatically say, yes my friends, family and neighbors, and the subscription services, and if available, these official services. >> So Blockchain can solve the immutability privacy issue? >> Yes. >> The decentralized nature of network effect is a dynamic that people look for in good deals or good architecture. That's in place. >> Yes. >> People have a social graph, interest graphs connections. So the analog world is going digital. I mean, the old days was, is there a doctor in the house? But you were limited by how far you could yell. >> Right. >> So here you're saying literally, if you connect properly, the users in charge are their, their data. >> Yeah. >> They can dictate what they want to connect to, where, is that kind of how it works, is it peer to peer? >> Yeah, it's sort of peer to peer. I mean, a lot of people think, a lot of people mishear me a little bit and think that when you press that button, the alert goes out to everybody that's nearby, right? So total strangers that may or may not be trustworthy are suddenly coming, that's not what I'm saying. That is not what we're doing because we don't want to accidentally summon Jack the Ripper, like that's, you don't want to make a bad situation worse, right? So, you explicitly invite people into your protection grid, we call them guardians, hence, Guardian Circle, that would be your guardian circle. And you can have an unlimited number of them, so six, 6000, however many friends you have. Then we will also feature paid subscription services where you will be able to subscribe to, like, your local EMT collective, or your local license and bonded arms security, or if you're in a remote corner of the world, you could subscribe to the guy with a truck, who could run you down the mountain, right? When you're having medical problems. So it's going to vary depending on where you are in the world. We're also working with the Women's Safety Xprize, we're a partner, we're the backend of that prize. Which is an IoT device contest to make a panic button device, right? So when you push the panic button, what happens? It goes into Guardian Circle. >> So how does token economics fit into this? So I'm getting why it's tokenizable, How does it work mechanically? Do I buy tokens for safety? Is it like, I mean, take us through some of the use cases. >> Yeah sure, so there's five different ways in which we use the token. The first one is, obviously, to create the, to buy emergency response subscriptions. Now we're going to allow you, or provide a way for you to, as a consumer, just swipe your credit card in the app, and in the background you'll be purchase Guardium tokens, right? And it'll re-up every month if you don't have enough in, it'll be that sort of thing. So you might not even really be conscious of the fact that you're using cryptocurrency. If you are, there's a wallet that'll allow you to just use the cryptocurrency manually, the way you do any, any right now, right? >> And. >> So there's that. >> Okay so continue. >> Yep, the second thing we're going to do, we think that giving will be a big behavior in our universe, so you're going to be able to send Guardium directly to a beneficiary in the developing world. And what's cool about that is it doesn't go through a governments, a bank, or an organization. So remember Red Cross in Haiti? Can't happen here, and we're going to go even further than that, down the road, you're going to be able to track every dollar that you donated as easily as a FedEx, right? >> So you are creating a direct relationship between people who might want to help people and then a direct access for resources for the user. >> Correct. >> And so that's the primary, kind of a two >> That's one major flywheel. >> major flywheels going on. >> Just like people sponsor a child, safety is one of the biggest problems in the world. In fact, some people say, this guy named, Greg Hahn, who says it's the number one problem in the world that all other problems flow from the fact that people in the developing world aren't safe. Why don't they have water? Cause they're not safe. Why don't they have education? Cause they're not safe. Lawlessness has to be solved first. >> Trust is a huge part of this too. >> Yeah. >> So how do I set this up, where are you guys in the system, is there a product up and running, how do people get involved with your project? Take a minute to share that. >> Sure, so we have apps released today and they're distributed world-wide on IOS, Android, and Alexa. We also have an open API that lets anyone plug any alert device into our grid, obviously we have to, we want to know who you are first, but basically everyone is welcome. And so, and then our token sales site is at Guardium, Guardium.co. >> G, Guard, ium, Guardium. >> Yes, Guardium. >> And then Guardian Circle? >> Correct. >> Guardium with the m and the end of the token. What's the plan, what are you guys, how much have you raised, what's the story? Yeah, so we're selling ten million dollars worth of tokens, which represents 30% overall, 33% overall. We have a 100 million tokens in the sys, that, that's it, that will ever be distributed. It's on the NEO Blockchain, so we are, we are, we're sort of different from a lot of other folks. We're one of the very first western, we're not the first but we're one of the firsts. >> NEO has a good reputation of high performance. >> Yes >> Is that one of the considerations you had for them? >> Yeah, without a doubt. I mean, we deal in emergencies, so our tolerance for things like CryptoKitty swamping the network is very low. So yeah, so we liked what NEO had to say in a lot of ways because of that. >> I interviewed the CryptoKitties at Polycon, interesting story. It's a Pokemon moment for the internet stare. Well congratulations Mark, what's next for you guys, get through the sale, how's the team makeup look, what's going on with the company? >> Yeah, get through, I mean, definitely get through the sale is the biggest thing right now. We're a small team of, like about five people, plus some contractors. The next big thing that we have on our agenda is we're going out to India in four weeks to actually test the Xprize IoT panic button devices on the streets of Mumbai, so Guardian Circle plus device. >> Intense environment a lot of people there. >> Yeah. >> So let's talk about you. What is your background that got you here, or was there an itch you were scratching? Why this time, also the way to attract a lot of alph entrepreneurs, this is a disruptive time, but why Mark Jeffrey's, why now, why Guradian Circle, what's the passion behind it? >> So, well I started life as an engineer, but I won't bore you with all my adventures up until this moment. But in 2013, I became very interested in Bitcoin, wrote a book called, Bitcoin Explained Simply. Got the book, got the little crazy thoughts in my head. >> You're an author, speaker >> Right, same thing. >> distinguished influencer. (laughs) >> So that was sort of how that side began. In 2014, I basically, my girlfriend at the time had a stroke, she's fine, but at the time she was all alone. And she was on the floor of her garage, and I took her to the hospital, brought her back, and afterwards, I realized, she was alone for about a half an hour, if this had been a real stroke, this could have been very serious, she could have died, she could have been paralyzed. And she was drowning in help, there were about seven people who were either driving by or nearby while this was going on, within a 1000 yards. And she had no way to get to them. >> Yeah, yeah, a personal example of what you're doing. >> And I also realized, the other component was, all the help, I didn't know six, five of the other six people, they're her friends, they're not mine. But during her emergency, all of us need to be sharing location and in communication with each other immediately. And the importance of that just cannot be overstated in emergencies, seconds count. And so putting instant communications so that we can coordinate a response is the second-half of the problem. I initially did not intend to build an app. I went looking for this app and what I discovered was there are a ton of panic button apps, but all of them neglected solving the second-half of the problem, which is organizing the response. >> Yeah. >> And getting people on, in the same-- >> Mobilizing resources. >> Yeah, getting everyone into a war room without requiring them to know each other ahead of time, that was the big thing, no one had thought of that, so. >> It's like rolling up services when you need it instantly. It's like a compiler. >> It's at hawk services. >> You know, compile everything >> Yes, exactly. >> at real time assembly. >> Real time assembly, yeah >> Operating system. (laughs) >> that's exactly, it's great. That's actually a really good way to put it, yeah. >> No, but this is also pretty important, so it was a great personal example, thanks for sharing that personal story. But you know, there's a avalanches, whether you're a skier, it's people who go rock climbing, there's all kinds of use cases where a mountain biker is missing, all kinds of-- >> Remote locations are really big ones. >> I'm scuba diving, where are people, where were they last? So a lot of this is, are location based, and no one knows what the situation is, so the alerting is only one step to the value chain. >> It is, but I think, sorry you have a question. >> No, no, I was going to ask you, where does it go from there? >> Well I think, I think there are a lot of, I think safety check-ins, I think there's other things that we can do, but the one thing that, the one lesson that I've seen again, and again, and again, and again is that the companies that fail invariably, oh, the companies that don't focus always fail. So you got to pick one thing and be the best in the world at that one thing. And the emergency situation is our one thing, and that's big enough. >> Well, I think you have a great opportunity and we'll splint through the, as the evolution of this market grows, it's kind of a moving train, but the value promises is legit. I was talking to Fred Krueger, your friend and colleague in the business, it's a marketplace of these days, so it's money and marketplaces, in your case it's safety, marketplace. I could envision a day with your services where I publish and subscribe to services, I got in a catalog. >> Yes. >> Hey, I know my risks, everyone knows what they do in vanity, or risk factors whether you're jumping out of an airplane, or double black diamond skier. I would love to go to Lake Tahoe, or a mountain, or a place like this, and saying, I'm going to take some chances, here's what I'm going to subscribe to. >> (laughs) You're going to have to subscribe to some extra tokens while you're there. >> I would use Guardium. It could be more, I'm just brainstorming, thinking out loud, but I mean, that's the kind of web services framework you could bring. >> That's exactly right. >> Is that they way you guys are thinking about it? >> I do, I do, I'm so focused on this sort of food and shelter stage of our life right now. >> Yeah, get an ICO done. So yeah, we've got tons of all those ideas written done but we're not quite there yet, but when we get there, great ideas, absolutely. >> Well the use cases are changing because the peoples expectations are changing and now technology can meet these cases. So I'm seeing a lot of social entrepreneurship being done that are coming in through a funding vehicles that never would have got funded on venture capital funding. >> Totally correct. >> Whether it's battered women applications, human trafficking, safety apps, stuff that can make money, not be a kazillion, billion dollar business, but really change society and makeup. >> You've hit the nail on the head. There are a lot of Blockchain companies or ICO companies, this stuff, the venture guys, would never fund it because their model doesn't allow for it. They have, all these things have to be Facebook potentially, or they just have no tolerance for it. >> And the philanthropy world is not incented on economics, and also when the project loses its grant or funding the stack just gets thrown away. >> So this allows for sustainability for mission-based investing and developing. Slowly, I see societal entrepreneurship categorically going to boom from this wave. >> Yeah, totally agree. >> Across the board. >> The world will become a better place, we'll have better companies. >> Mark Jeffery, Guardian Circle, co-founder and CEO. This is theCUBE's exclusive coverage here on the ground in Puerto, Rico for Blockchain Unbound. A lot of great stuff here, a lot of great start-ups, investors, of course theCUBE. 2018 will be covering all the shows. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching.

Published Date : Mar 15 2018

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Blockchain Industries. and around the glove, the coin, token that you're that is the way it is. So 911 is broken? that help to you as quickly as possible. So to me when you say, what every persons capability to understand the So that sounds like the a little bit, probably So no legacy baggage, That's what they got. And the phone number is your is a dynamic that people look for So the analog world is going digital. the users in charge are their, their data. the alert goes out to So how does token the way you do any, any right now, right? to track every dollar that you So you are creating in the developing world aren't safe. where are you guys in the system, to, we want to know who you are first, What's the plan, what are you guys, NEO has a good the network is very low. I interviewed the CryptoKitties on the streets of Mumbai, a lot of people there. the passion behind it? Got the book, got the little (laughs) but at the time she was all alone. example of what you're doing. And the importance of that just cannot that was the big thing, no when you need it instantly. (laughs) That's actually a really But you know, there's a avalanches, Remote locations are really so the alerting is only one sorry you have a question. and again is that the and colleague in the going to subscribe to. have to subscribe to some extra but I mean, that's the kind of I do, I do, I'm so So yeah, we've got tons of Well the use cases stuff that can make money, You've hit the nail on the head. And the philanthropy world So this allows for sustainability The world will become a better place, on the ground in Puerto,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Greg HahnPERSON

0.99+

Mark JefferyPERSON

0.99+

Mark JefferyPERSON

0.99+

MarkPERSON

0.99+

2014DATE

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

Fred KruegerPERSON

0.99+

Mark JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

AfricaLOCATION

0.99+

33%QUANTITY

0.99+

MumbaiLOCATION

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

Puerto, RicoLOCATION

0.99+

HaitiLOCATION

0.99+

IndiaLOCATION

0.99+

six peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

Guardian CircleORGANIZATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

PolyconORGANIZATION

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

TelcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

ten peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

three minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

FedExORGANIZATION

0.99+

1960DATE

0.99+

Jack the RipperPERSON

0.99+

AndroidTITLE

0.99+

Lake TahoeLOCATION

0.99+

NEOORGANIZATION

0.99+

IOSTITLE

0.99+

Red CrossORGANIZATION

0.99+

911OTHER

0.99+

ten million dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

one billionQUANTITY

0.99+

six billion peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

GuardiumORGANIZATION

0.99+

five different waysQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

AlexaTITLE

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

Guardian CircleORGANIZATION

0.98+

CryptoKittiesORGANIZATION

0.98+

Women's Safety XprizeEVENT

0.98+

100 million tokensQUANTITY

0.98+

San Juan, Puerto RicoLOCATION

0.98+

Puerto, RicoLOCATION

0.98+

FredPERSON

0.98+

second-halfQUANTITY

0.98+

one thingQUANTITY

0.98+

first oneQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

Guradian CircleORGANIZATION

0.97+

one stepQUANTITY

0.97+

twoQUANTITY

0.97+

GuardORGANIZATION

0.97+

1000 yardsQUANTITY

0.97+

about a half an hourQUANTITY

0.97+

CryptoKittyORGANIZATION

0.97+

second thingQUANTITY

0.97+

60'sDATE

0.97+

four weeksQUANTITY

0.96+

Guardium.coORGANIZATION

0.96+

GORGANIZATION

0.96+

billion dollarQUANTITY

0.95+

earthLOCATION

0.95+

one major flywheelQUANTITY

0.95+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.94+

firstsQUANTITY

0.94+

EMTORGANIZATION

0.92+

about five peopleQUANTITY

0.92+

Jeffrey Davis, Deloitte Consulting | Oracle OpenWorld 2015


 

>>live from San Francisco, extracting the signal from the noise. It's the cues covering Oracle OpenWorld 2015. Brought to you by Oracle. How your hosts, John Courier and Jeff Rick Wait, >>We are here. Live in Howard's treated oracle. OpenWorld for Silicon Angles, The Cube Exclusive coverage Star flagship program. We go out to the events extract the cinnamon noise. I'm John Kerry, the founder of Silicon, and Brian gracefully lead analyst on all the cloud and all the infrastructure stuff going on here. Next guess is Jeffrey Davis, Principal Gore, Oracle, global leader for Deloitte and Touche. Legend in the industry. I've been covering Oracle for a long time. Good to see you, John Bryan allegedly knew she had to get that in there. Love that. You know you guys are. The service's angle has been something that the service's business is. It's been changing radically. Now more than ever with clouds. I really want to get your take because you are an executive looking at this transformation of cloud. But the Lloyd across all the Oracle customer base, your party with customers. So you're the front lines. I gotta ask you straight up. What is the number one thing customers are looking at right now that you partner with four Cloud to figure it out. Is it a migration? All the above, And what do you think about that? So when customers are evaluating the cloud or our clients are looking at the club, you really focus on three things. One is agility. Thea other one is time and the other one is valued. So how quickly can we adopt to the changing environment? How quickly can we leverage technologies like clouds in order to be able to respond to our customers, to adapt to the changing needs of our employees, to embrace our business strategy in a new and innovative way? So I said legend, you know, talk about the eighties for women on camera. That's important point I want to bring up. Is that Is that the old way? Big growth of client server was around software middleware right year BC around you name it that created huge consultancies like Lloyd, you participated in that create a lot of wealth creation for the customers, create value, right, but their cycles were long in the deal. That'll be about 12 13 years now, months and almost a year or two, there were all these big deployments. Now the cloud is accelerating when you compare and contrast time of then share. And now with the cloud Just how much the deployments change the software, the organizations, How you guys operate a new way to do that job well, and we're all responding to the market, right? While responding to customers needs Cloud didn't come about because of technology in it of itself. But we're really all in this ecosystem responding to our customers must customers a really demanding from us is there demanding agility and speed. As I said before, if you take a look at the way we used to do things, basically you had a a large capital investment on the part of the customers. They went, they bought the software, they bought the hardware, they had to hire the expertise of an advantage, mail the eggs, and you're looking at a transformation for them that could take anywhere from 12 to 24 months or longer before they would get time to value. And, you know, these projects didn't go as planned. No, that's this is Yeah, I know the change orders came in paid more cash on DSO. We all got a really bad reputation because of the high costs in a long time to value and even if value was ever realized in some cases, now we take a look at the environment and what the cloud enables us to do is move in a much faster pace. Way used to have what we call a waterfall approach to design and implementation went into a big room and you talked about the world and I never ran that way. And then you put it into the system and then people never really embraced it, because when it came out, it didn't look like anything they thought they were gonna get. This is completely different with cloud. Now you can take an agile approach. Now you can sit and listen to the customer demands very quickly respond to what they think they need, where they really generate value. And then you can focus on those things and very quickly there, in a design session with you And at the end of the day, >>changed management is much easier because they've been a part of the process and also, you know, looking at 90 days sprints. You're looking at things that are done. You know, in >>six months, six months, time to value that can give you compress a competitive advantage. You know, that could help you retain Maur employees or customers. So it's really some timetable. Met Lavery s V p of the Cloud Gru. Gru Integration was saying they were doing provisioning on in 24 minutes. Multiple deployments like like nobody's business. What has them in the timetable that you're seeing for some of these times of value, horizons means hurdles. These milestones said days, weeks, months, hours, minutes. I mean, when you go to a customer base where their expectations of what you guys deliver, there's some insight there. Some of it depends on the environment. So remember they're still clients. We have local customers that are in a highly regulated industry or have a very complex prisons process. Those are gonna take a longer there is they're gonna take in. Technology is not necessarily on the critical path. But when you look at those other areas that frankly, you don't differentiate yourself very much or speed with a solution concave you a competitive advantage. You know, you're looking at a client expectations of anywhere from 90 days, you know, to six months, you know, manager here, very manager, but aggressive. Visa VI the old way. Well, certainly, And the other piece that we're not really talking about is, you know, it's not enough for us to put the technology out there. It's also got to be used and adopted. You know, when you had those large transformations. It's very hard for an organization to absorb all of that change. Now we're looking at the fine entry point that you could get with clouds with that fine entry point. Now we can sub select areas with greatest impact, but we're not changing the entire organization. >>Mark Hurd has the C I. O. G. On this morning and one of the comments that he made. I've heard this a number of times over the last 12 18 months. He essentially said, I have a ton of undifferentiated applications now. They're things that that Oracle thinks are fantastic. HCM and C. R. M and Air P. But in essence, everybody has those. Every business has those very undifferentiated, but they're complicated. What? You Seymour, you see more people saying you know what take those. Help me migrate those into SAS applications, you know, save costs. Where do you see more saying, You know what? Give me the other 20%. The ones that drive business differentiation, ones that are new cloud native applications. What do you see in your mix? What's pushing your customers >>to push you? You know, it depends on the geography, and it depends on the industry and some other things. If you want to talk about North America, which tends to be one of the largest markets in the world, if not the largest market in the world, when you're looking in North America, really people have gone through a lot of the major ear piece. Remember the earlier conversation? You know, they have suffered through tens of millions, hundreds of millions of dollars, and their boards were not satisfied that they got the results of the expected. Now, when you take a look at what's happening, you know, people are now being much more strategic in their investments, much more prescriptive there. Look how they spent exactly, because now the boards have different expectations. They've already gone and spent all that money on technology. They can't go back to the board. Can't say we need to redo this. What they do are willing to fund is you want to get into a new business. If you want to spin something off, you need to stand it up right away. If a customer you know, provide you a new opportunity, you want to shift to that new opportunity. Really? Well, technology is the basis of a lot of this transformation. So Cloud provides that opportunity and it's modest investment with really quick, high value. It's a great point >>you look at I t In the past decades prior to this evolution, we're seeing the cloud consolidate, consolidate, consolidate, right? I don't know the well again. I just went to the well, apparently running, you know, whatever the model was there. But now they're under a lot of pressure to drive top line revenue. Absolute. Now, the top line revenue equations, a completely different mindset. You have to go out and oh, cut the market. You gotta use a shadow I t or your authorized go out. Do legitimate stand up new platforms are Can you give me an example of that? We're seeing more of that now. A clear Mandate. Cee Io's Go take a New Hill or let's consolidate these apt and reposition for this new use case, which is not. That's experiment, but it's certainly a new market opportunity, and they gotta do their due diligence, so it's almost unparalleled. Due diligence kills your waterfall. That's one doesn't talk about that dynamic. Where examples you give go. Take that new top line revenue driver. So you know that there are customers that are looking at new partnerships in the marketplace, and those new partnerships have dynamic new business models. You know, it's not like opening up another hamburger stand. You know, they're not necessarily expanding into our core business. They're really looking at ways to amplify growth. If you're gonna take that as a strategic position, then you know customer or client of ours would focus on, you know, let's take this innovation the market. We don't want to invest a lot in it, waste a lot of time and lose the competitive advantage. Let's >>get to market first. Let's provide a new product or service to the market where we can move very quickly, and then the >>net result is we can see the benefits right away. And if it isn't way, haven't sunk a lot of time and money and something that's not necessarily gonna have the same values. We just had Shawn Price on. And I'm gonna ask this because it's a lemon that you're in because you're part of the customer right here, the strategic partner of the customer. So that idea top line revenue growth could come from a partner. When I see How do you work in that? Quick, You're cool to work with my Aunt VI's. Bring that into the table. You're absolutely so this market is changing. You know, Cloud clearly changes everything and much more so than some of the things we've seen in the past. And so now we need to position ourselves differently now for the Deloitte Business Model way. We're really in a specialized business of focusing highly on value and value creation. We weren't necessarily in other areas and we have different partnerships now. Those partnerships are shifting. Oracle provides us a complete platform. You know, we don't >>have to really get involved in a lot of the aspects of the platform that, frankly, we're in our core competency and frankly, weren't our clients what >>you talked about that customer interaction? What do you have to do to change what we've seen? Different size, trying different approaches? We've seen some that are partnering with cloud Provider, but they want to be their own flat for acquiring them. What changes in terms of the skills you have to hire the way you expect that interaction toe happen between you and customer. Because to a certain extent, like for developers, developers love self service. They do. You know, they they are shadow I because they're driving What changes in your world for that? >>So this is really kind of an interesting question. Very early on, when Oracle made cloud product available >>in HCM, we saw an opportunity. Our clients had the demand because they wanted to create a more sticky environment from customers. What better >>way than providing them better products in the HCM space? We made major investments there. Now we're a leader in HCM, and if I look back over that experience, what do we do differently? First of all, we had to change our mindset. You know, it's not enough just to say the cloud, but you gotta live the cloud because it truly is more agile. It truly is faster. You can take your old methods and tools and approaches all the things that worked for you before. A lot of them don't work anymore. There's some but some really good winds here, especially in the change management side. Also, you know, we'd have clients that had to kind of do it yourself brain surgery that have to order their own hardware that have provisional themselves. You know, that became a real mess. Now we're looking at something that's a lot different. We're not in that business anymore. You know, we do support on Prem where our clients think it's important and strategic course. But now we've got a new, agile methodology. Now we've trained our workforce. We've got 14,500 professionals around the world. We've had to move that group, and Oracle really helped us do that. They've been very collaborative in sharing I p and sharing methods and tools with us so we can make that adjustment. Not only have we had to change that when you think about our other methodologies, all of our other methodology to create value to change management, they were all thoroughly integrated. We've had to rethink those, but it's been a great story because we could go to the client. We can say we can get you there faster because where technology was a barrier world, >>it was on the critical path. We're now changing that. And by the way, this technology is not your old technology. It's much better. It's much more robust. How >>do you you know, obviously we're here It at an oracle OpenWorld. It could be called Oracle Cloud >>World if we really wanted to. I mean, >>it's a lot of it is the red stack. A lot of it is one cloud. How do you manage that against customers saying, Well, look, there's other options as well. I wanna have the ability to leverage this cloud for something. Oracles cloud for certain things. How do you do? You find your customers want multiple clouds or one cloud is good enough? >>Well, we're all teaching right? We're all teaching the world about God because you know there's still people that look at it in a variety of different ways. I think it's an excellent question, so let's think about this. >>Do you want to be your own systems integrator for your smartphone. You want to go by an operating system? Do you want to go buy a separate peace of heart? Where do you >>want to decide what APS fit? What don't. And do you want to actually try to get those abs together? I don't think we want to do that anymore. And I try to use that as an example for my clients. Tell them. Look, let's not be your own systems integrator. You is a iittie executive. You could be an officer toe, help the organization get to their business goals. You know, you're not in another yourself a business objective, but you could be an agent for change. I try to educate them so they can help their colleagues explain cloud, take the fear out and then show the art of the possible. What about the security model? I mean, I wouldn't get your take on you little bit biased because your manager Oracle really? But what would be global, critical or complementary events? How you feel about it? But the intense security message is really a game changer in my mind. Follows on incredible theory. Incredible application. Certainly the product's gonna be ready soon. If it works, it's like a car that does the key turnover. It's like it's all good on paper. Certainly a game changer. Security outside number One thing you're hearing Get some color to that because, you know, if that plays out, if you believe that end N security on the chips and software Silicon plays out the way they say it would, that's gonna change the game. For sure. It is. So none of us and you can go through a week without hearing about a major security breach. When you think about this, you step back and think about the potential here. Our stuff is starting to talkto our stuff. But our stuff isn't unless it's based on. Oracle isn't all thoroughly integrated, so somebody can break into our stuff and they can get access to our lives and they can change our lives. That's hugely powerful. So we are very concerned about security, and Lloyd is one of the largest organizations. In fact, we have a cyber practice that looks at both Proactiv reactive aspects of security. Here's the big concern we have as all this stuff starts, get interconnected. The Internet of things, security becomes a major issue. We need more breakthroughs and security. And I think oracles on the vanguard certainly as we get into what we call a hyper hybrid cloud on Prem on Cloud. Some of that's gonna be a great emotion is no. Perimeter is nothing either. Protect is the Wild West total while and, you know, despite what you believe, boards and people are not reacting fast enough to security threats. And that's why you're seeing these breaches into my knowledge. I don't think anybody has been breached with Orgel security in place. But that said, you have to be really, But still, they probably would get out. There's not that they're hiding it, but the point is, you need to be united engine system. It's hard to do that in a open source world, right? So you have a horizontally scaled open source phenomenon, and it's growing our market and a vertically integrated product requirement. You believe I want Indian security, then you gonna go vertically integrated. You do purpose built. But if you want scale a 1,000,000,000 large scale a k a cloud, you want horizontally scalable. How do you reconcile that with your customers? Well, you know so again. It's difficult for them because unless you've had a security threat, it's very difficult to really get them to take the initiative. You know, the more that we can build security in, the more that it's covered in the Red Sea. More that we get a comprehensive end to end product. I think it allows us to help the client realize you know the risk and help them. The old Fowler said. In The Cube they had they had this done in 2005. Finally took a bunch of security breaches to get people's attention to your point. It's on everyone's agenda. Number one right it is. And yet you know how much is enough? Well, we find the people are too reactive and not not proactive enough. >>What's the What's the temperature of your customers right now? I mean, you know, Tesla's out, they're disrupting Uber's out. Their Airbnb are they? Are they sort of defensive and paranoid? You know that Andy Grove, always trying to be aggressive with a saying No, no, no, no. I'm not letting these little guys into my market. I'm gonna go be aggressive and try and push back what a general feeling. There's a lot of interesting startup disruption going on really changing industry. >>There is, and you know, there's so many sort of partnerships and alliances, mergers and new innovations. You know, right now, clients are very uncomfortable. Just the transition from on Prem to Cloud is a major change in our clients have been the expert for technology for decades for their organization. They are having trouble keeping up with all of it. It can be disruptive. They're looking at what's unique in their industry. You know what is regulation driving? You know what is innovation driving in their industry? But, you know, they're always on the learning curve. They're always trying to figure out if we want to get your final thought wrapping up here to get your take for the folks that are watching here on camera that couldn't make it here were beloved world. What is this show about it? We've been here six years. You've seen that transformation. About four years ago, Larry looked like a deer in the headlights, almost stuck in his tracks and smoke coming out of his ears like he felt that the scene felt like a pivotal moment couple years ago. And then since then, just been every year. Oracle just gets more and more energy, just like dominated that march of the crowd. Almost like four years ago. Like we're gonna win that. What's your vibe? You see that same thing here and shared some color on the take is over the years, and we've been doing this a lot in various forms Over the years. There's been the promise of riel innovation. There's been the promise, real change in the industry. We saw sort of incremental change. We really see increments. Exponential change now and now. The promises fulfilled. We have real product. We're taking the market. We're doing interesting product, right? Israel product. It's very riel, and we have work to be done. But yeah, really studies and customers? Well, it's an evolution. But this is really sort of an epiphany at the moment, because we've never had, >>you know, full sweets of product in the marketplace. Not right now. I don't know that there are any other large you know. Air Pia options in the clouds away there is for Oracle and look at the host of service is that have been announced over the last year. >>This this particular show for us, you know, really isn't accelerating. All these products and service is in the cloud that are now available. They give us a lot of different options that we never had. A great quote. Put that on a cube. Jim. Thanks for joining Us. Way are here live in San Francisco's Howard Street for the Cube Special. Exclusive coverage of Oracle OpenWorld Q. Be right back with more of this short break. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Oct 26 2015

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Oracle. What is the number one thing customers are looking at right now that you partner with four you know, looking at 90 days sprints. You know, that could help you retain Maur employees or customers. You Seymour, you see more people saying you know what take those. You know, it depends on the geography, then you know customer or client of ours would focus on, you know, Let's provide a new product or service to the market where we can move very quickly, Bring that into the table. What changes in terms of the skills you have to hire the way you expect So this is really kind of an interesting question. Our clients had the demand because they wanted to create a more sticky environment Not only have we had to change that when you think about our other And by the way, this technology is not your do you you know, obviously we're here It at an oracle OpenWorld. World if we really wanted to. How do you manage that against customers you know there's still people that look at it in a variety of different ways. Do you want to be your own systems integrator for your smartphone. the client realize you know the risk and help them. I mean, you know, Tesla's out, they're disrupting Uber's Oracle just gets more and more energy, just like dominated that march of the crowd. you know, full sweets of product in the marketplace. This this particular show for us, you know, really isn't accelerating.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
John KerryPERSON

0.99+

Mark HurdPERSON

0.99+

John BryanPERSON

0.99+

Andy GrovePERSON

0.99+

TeslaORGANIZATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

BrianPERSON

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeffrey DavisPERSON

0.99+

DeloitteORGANIZATION

0.99+

2005DATE

0.99+

John CourierPERSON

0.99+

North AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

20%QUANTITY

0.99+

JimPERSON

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

90 daysQUANTITY

0.99+

24 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

SeymourPERSON

0.99+

HCMLOCATION

0.99+

1,000,000,000QUANTITY

0.99+

14,500 professionalsQUANTITY

0.99+

AirbnbORGANIZATION

0.99+

12QUANTITY

0.99+

OraclesORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

tens of millionsQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

six yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

LarryPERSON

0.99+

24 monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

couple years agoDATE

0.99+

LloydORGANIZATION

0.98+

Jeff Rick WaitPERSON

0.98+

OrgelORGANIZATION

0.98+

Deloitte ConsultingORGANIZATION

0.98+

Red SeaLOCATION

0.98+

four years agoDATE

0.98+

last yearDATE

0.98+

Air P.ORGANIZATION

0.98+

one cloudQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

one cloudQUANTITY

0.97+

FirstQUANTITY

0.96+

three thingsQUANTITY

0.96+

twoQUANTITY

0.95+

hundreds of millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.95+

IsraelLOCATION

0.95+

About four years agoDATE

0.95+

HCMORGANIZATION

0.93+

SiliconORGANIZATION

0.92+

about 12 13 yearsQUANTITY

0.91+

Cloud Gru. GruORGANIZATION

0.9+

past decadesDATE

0.9+

OpenWorldEVENT

0.89+

HowardPERSON

0.87+

last 12 18 monthsDATE

0.86+

OracleEVENT

0.85+

this morningDATE

0.85+

almostQUANTITY

0.85+

PremORGANIZATION

0.84+

Howard StreetLOCATION

0.84+

GodPERSON

0.83+

Wild WestLOCATION

0.83+

OpenWorld 2015EVENT

0.82+

DSOORGANIZATION

0.8+

GorePERSON

0.79+

eightiesDATE

0.79+

decadesQUANTITY

0.78+

Cee IoPERSON

0.77+

SASORGANIZATION

0.74+

Video Exclusive: Sales Impact Academy Secures $22M In New Funding


 

(upbeat music) >> Every company needs great salespeople, it's one of the most lucrative professions out there. And there's plenty of wisdom and knowledge that's been gathered over the years about selling. We've heard it all, famous quotes from the greatest salespeople of our time, like Zig Ziglar and Jeffrey Gitomer, and Dale Carnegie and Jack Welch, and many others. Things like, "Each of us has only 24 hours in a day, "it's all about how we use our time." And, "You don't have to be great to start, "but you have to start to be great." And then I love this one, "People hate to be sold, but they love to buy." "There are no traffic jams on the extra mile, "make change before you have to." And the all time classic, "Put that coffee down. "Coffee is for closers." Thousands of pieces of sales advice are readily available in books, videos, on blogs and in podcasts, and many of these are free of charge. So why would entrepreneurs start a company to train salespeople? And how is it that sharp investors are pouring millions of dollars into this space? Hello everyone, and welcome to this Cube Video Exclusive, my name is Dave Vellante, and today we welcome Paul Fifield who's the co-founder and CEO of Sales Impact Academy who's going to answer these questions and share some exciting news on the startups. Paul, welcome to "The Cube" good to see you again. >> Yeah, good to see you again, Dave, great to be here. >> Hey, so before we get into the hard news, tell us a little bit about the Sales Impact Academy, why'd you start the company, maybe some of the fundamentals of this market, your total available market, who you're targeting, you know, what's the premise behind the company? >> Yeah sure. So I mean, I started the company, it was actually pretty organic in the way it began. I had a 10 year career as a CRO and it was, you know, had a couple of great hits with two companies, but it was a real struggle to basically, you know, operate as a CRO and learn your craft at the same time. And so when I left my last company, I kind of got out there, I wanted to kind of give back a little bit and I started doing some voluntary teaching in and around London, and I actually, one of the companies I started was in New York so I got schooled very much on a sort of US approach to how you build a modern you know, go to market and sales operation. Started going out there, doing some teaching, realized that so many people just didn't have a clue about how to build a scalable and predictable revenue function, and I kind of felt sorry for them. So I literally started doing some, you know, online classes myself, got my co-founder Alex to put curriculum together as well and we literally started just doing online classes, very live, very organic, just a Google Drive and some decks, and it really just blew up from there. >> That's amazing. I mean, so you've my, you know, tongue and cheek up front, but people might wonder, why do you need a platform 'cause there's so much free information out there? Is it to organize, is it a discipline thing? Explain that. >> Well, I think the way I sort of see this is that is that the lack of structured learning and education is actually one of the greatest educational travesties, I think, of the last 50 years, okay. Now sales and go to market is a huge global profession, right? Half the world's companies are B2B, so roughly that's a proxy for half the world's GDP, right? Which is $40 trillion of GDP. Now that 40 trillion rests on kind of the success of the growth and the sales functions of all those companies. Yet in its infinite wisdom, the global education system literally just ignored sales and go to market as a profession. Some universities are kind of catching up, but it's really too little too late. So what I sort of say to people, you imagine this Dave, right. You imagine if the way that law worked as a profession let's say, is that there's no law school, there's no law training, there's no even in work professional continuous professional development in law. The way that it works is you leave university, join a company, start practicing law and just use like YouTube just to maybe like, you know, where you're struggling, just use YouTube to like work out what's going on. The legal profession would be in absolute chaos. And that's what's happened in the sales and go to market profession, okay. What this profession desperately desperately needs is structured learning, good pedagogy, good well designed course and curriculum. And here's the other thing, right? Is the sort of paradox of infinite information is that just because all the information is out there, right, doesn't mean it's actually a good learning experience. Like, where do you find it? What's good? What's not good? And also the other thing I'd point out is that there is this kind of myth that all the information is out there on the internet. But actually what we do, and we'll come into it in a second is, the people teaching on our platform are the elite people from the industry. They haven't got time to do blog posts and just explain to people how they operate. They're going from company to company working at like, you know, working at these kind of elite companies. And they're the people that teach, and that information is not readily available and freely out there on the internet. >> Yeah, real opportunity, you made some great points there. I think business schools are finally starting to teach a little bit about public speaking and presenting, but nobody's teaching us how to sell. As Earl Nightingale says, "To some degree we're all salespeople, "selling our family on living the good life" or whatever. What movie we want to see tonight. But okay, let's get to the hard news. You got fresh funding of 22 million, tell us about that, congratulations. You know, the investors, what else can you share with us? >> Sure. Well, I mean, obviously, you know, immensely proud. We started from very sort of humble beginnings, as I said, we've now scaled very rapidly, we're a subscription business, we're a SaaS business. We'll come onto some of the growth metrics shortly, but just in a couple of years, you know, the last year which ended January, we grew 500% from year one, we're now well over 125 people, and I'm very, very, very honored, flattered, humbled that MIT, obviously one of those prestigious universities in the world, has taken a direct investment by their endowment fund, HubSpot Ventures. Another Boston great has also taken a direct investment as well. They actually began as a customer and loved what we were doing so much that they then decided to make an investment. Stage 2 Capital who invested in our seed round pretty much tripled down, played a huge role in helping us assemble MIT and HubSpot ventures as investors, and they continue to be an incredible VC giving us amazing, amazing support that their LP network of go to market leaders is second to none. And then Emerge Education, who is our pre-seed investor, they're actually based in London, also joined this round as well. >> Great, well actually, let's jump ahead. Let's talk about the metrics. I mean, if Stage Two is involved, they're hardcore. What can you share with us about, you know, everybody's chasing AR and NR and the like, what can you share with us? >> They are both pretty important. Well, I think from a headcount perspective, so as I mentioned our fiscal ends at the end of January, each year. We've gone from 25 to over 125 employees in that time. We've gone from 82 to 260 customers also in that time. And customers now include HubSpot, Gong, Klaviyo, GitHub, GT, Six Cents, so some really sort of major SaaS companies in the space. Our revenue's grown significantly with 5X. So 500% increase in revenue year over year, which is pretty fast, very proud of that. Our learning community has gone from over 3000 people to almost 15,000 professionals, and that makes us comfortably, the largest go to market learning community in the world. >> How did you decide when to scale? What were the sort of signals that said to you, "Okay, we're ready, "we have product market fit, "we can now scale the go to market." What were the signals there, Paul? >> Yeah. Well, I mean, I think for a very small team to achieve that level of growth in customers, to be kind of honest with you, like it's the pull that we're getting from the market. And I think the thing that has surprised me the most, perhaps in the last 12 months, is the pull we're getting from the enterprise. We're you know, I can't really announce, we've actually got a huge pilot with one of the largest companies actually in the world which is going fantastically well, our pipeline for enterprise customers is absolutely huge. But as you can imagine, if you've got distributed teams all over the world, we're living and working in this kind of hybrid world, how on earth do you kind of upscale all those people, right, that are, like I say, that are so distributed. It's impossible. Like in work, in the office delivery of training is pretty much dead, right? And so we sort of fill this really big pain, we solved this really, really big pain of how to effectively upskill people through this kind of live curriculum and this live teaching approach that we have. So I think for me, it's the pull that we're getting from the market really meant that you know, we have to double down. There is such a massive TAM, it is absolutely ridiculous. I mean, I think there are 20 million people just in sales and go to market in tech alone, right. And I mentioned to you earlier, half the world's companies effectively, you know, are B2B and therefore represent, you know, at its largest scope, our TAM. >> Excellent, thank you for that. Tell us more about the product and the platform. How's it work if I'm a customer, what type of investment do I have to make both financially? And what's my time commitment? How do you structure that? >> So the model is basically on a seat model. So roughly speaking, every seat's about a thousand dollars per year per rep. The lift is light. So we've got a very low onboarding, it's not a highly complex technical product, right? We've got a vast curriculum of learning that covers learning for, you know, SDRs, and the AEs, and CS reps, and leadership management training. We're developing curriculum for technical pre-sales, we're developing curriculum for revenue operations. And so it's very, very simple. We basically, it's a seat model, people literally just send us the seats and the details, we get people up and running in the platform, they start then enrolling and we have a customer success team that then plots out learning journeys and learning pathways for all of our customers. And actually what's starting to happen now, which is very, very exciting is that, you know, we're actually a key part of people's career development pathway. So to go from you know, SDR1 let's say to SDR2, you have to complete these three courses with Sales Impact Academy, and let's say, get 75% in your exam and it becomes a very powerful and simple way of developing career pathway. >> Yeah, so really detailed curriculum. So I was going to say, do I as a sales professional, do I pick and choose the things that are most relevant for me? Or are people actually going through a journey in career progression, or maybe both? >> Yeah, it's a mixture of both. We tend to see now, we're sort of starting to standardize, but really we're developing enough curriculum that over, let's say a 15 year period, you could start with us as an SDR and then end as a chief revenue officer, you know, running the entire function. This is the other thing about the crazy world of go to market. Very often, people are put into roles and it's sink or swim. There's no real learning that happens, there's no real development that happens before people take these big steps. And what this platform does so beautifully is is it equips people with the right skills and knowledge before they take that next step in their profession and in their career. And it just dramatically improves their chances of succeeding. >> Who are the trainers? Who's leading the classes, how do you find these guys, how do you structure? What are the content, you know, vectors, where's all that come from? >> Yeah. So the sort of secret source of what we do, beyond just the live instruction, beyond the significant amount of peer to peer learning that goes on, is that we go and source the absolute most elite people in go to market to teach, okay. Now I mentioned to you before, you've got these people that are going from like job to job at the very like the sort of peak of their careers, working for these incredible companies, it's that knowledge that we want to get access to, right. And so Stage 2 Capital is an incredible resource. The interesting thing about Stage 2 Capital as you know Dave, you know, run by Mark Roberge, who was on when we spoke last year and also Jay Po is all the LPs of Stage 2 Capital represent 3 to 400 of the most elite go to market professionals in the world. So, you know, about seven or eight of those are now on an advisory board. And so we have access to this incredible pool of talent. And so we know by consulting these amazing people who are the best people in certain aspects of go to market. We reach out to them and very often they're at a stage in their career where they're really kind of willing to give back, of course there are commercials around it as well, and there's lots of other benefits that we provide our teachers and our faculty, and what we call our coaches. But yeah, we source the very, very best people in the world to teach. >> Now, how does it work as a user of your service? Is it all on demand? Do you do live content or a combination? >> Yeah look, one of the big differentiators is this is a live delivery of learning, okay. Most learning online is typically done on demand, self-directed, and there's a ton of research. There's a great blog post on Andrew's recent site. A short time ago, which is talking about how the completion rates of on demand learning are somewhere between 3 and 6%. That is like, that's awful. >> Terrible. >> I was like why bother? However, we're seeing through that live instruction. So we teach two, one hour classes a week, that's it. We're upskilling very busy people, they're stressed, they've got targets. We have to be very, very cognizant of that. So we teach two, one hour classes a week. Typically, you know, Monday and a Wednesday, or a Tuesday and a Thursday. And that pace of learning is about right, it's kind of how humans learn as well. You know, short bursts of information, and then put that learning and those skills that you've acquired in class literally to work minutes after the class finishes. And so through that, and it sits in your calendar like a meeting, it doesn't feel overwhelming, you're learning together as a team as well. And all that combined, we see completion rates often in excess of 80% for our courses. >> Okay, so they block that time out- >> In the calendar, yeah. >> And they make an investment. Go ahead, please. >> Yeah yeah, exactly, sorry Dave. Yeah, yeah, exactly. So like, you know, we have course lengths. So one of our shorter courses are like four hours long over two weeks. And again, it's just literally in the calendar. We also teach what we call The Magic Learning Hour. And the magic learning hour is this one specific hour in the day that enables teams all over the western hemisphere to join the same class. And that magic learning hour is eight o'clock Pacific 11 o'clock Eastern, >> 4: 00 PM over in the UK, and 5:00 PM in the rest of Europe. And that one time in the day means that these enterprises have got teams all over the western hemisphere joining that class, learning together as a team, plus it's in the calendar and it's that approach is why we're seeing such high engagement and completion. >> That's very cool, the time zone thing. Now who's the target buyer? Are you selling only to sales teams? Can I as an individual purchase your service? >> Yeah, that's a good question. Currently it's a very much like a B2B motion. As I mentioned earlier on, we're getting an enormous pull from the enterprise, which is very exciting. You know, we have an enterprise segment, we have sort of more of a startup earlier stage segment, and then we have a mid-market segment that we call our sort of strategic, and that's typically and most of like venture backed, fast growth tech companies. So very much at the moment a B2B motion. We're launching our own technology platform in the early summer, and then later on this year we're going to be adding what's called PLG or a product led growth, so individuals can actually sign up to SIA. >> Yeah, I mean, I think you said $1,000 per year per rep, is that right? I mean, that's- >> Yeah. >> That's a small investment for an individual that wants to be part of, you know, this community and grow his or her career. So that's the growth plan? You go down market I would imagine, you talked about the western hemisphere, there's international opportunities maybe, local language. What's the growth plan? >> Yeah, I mean look, we've identified the magic learning hour for the middle east and APAC, which is eight o'clock in the morning in Istanbul, right. Is 5:00 PM in Auckland, it's quite fun trying to work out like what this optimum magic learning hour is. What's incredible is we teach in that time and that opens up the whole of the middle east and the whole of APAC, right, right down to Australia. And so once we're teaching the curriculum in those two slots, that means literally you can have teams in any country in the world, I think apart from Hawaii, you can actually access our live learning products in work time and that's incredibly powerful. So we have so many like axis of growth, we've got single users as I mentioned, but really Dave that's single users we'll be winning from the enterprise and that will represent pipeline that we could then potentially convert as well. And look, you make a very good point. You know, we've seen students are now leaving university with over $100,000 dollars in debt. We've got a massive, massive debt problem here in the US with student debt. You could absolutely sign up to our platform at let's say a hundred bucks a month, right. And probably within six months, gain enough knowledge and skill to walk into a $60,000 a year based salary job as an SDR, that's a huge entry level salary. And you could do that without even going to university. So there could be a time here where we become a really viable alternative to actually even going to university. >> I love it. The cost education going through the roof, it's out of reach for so many people. Paul, congratulations on the progress, the fresh funding. Great to have you back in "The Cube." We'd love to have you back and follow your ascendancy. I think great things ahead for you guys. >> Thank you very much, Dave. >> All right, and thank you for watching. This is Dave Vellante for "The Cube, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Mar 29 2022

SUMMARY :

And the all time classic, Yeah, good to see you again, Dave, and it was, you know, had Is it to organize, is in the sales and go to You know, the investors, but just in a couple of years, you know, AR and NR and the like, community in the world. "we can now scale the go to market." And I mentioned to you earlier, product and the platform. So to go from you know, the things that are most relevant for me? This is the other thing about Now I mentioned to you before, how the completion rates minutes after the class finishes. And they make an investment. And the magic learning hour and 5:00 PM in the rest of Europe. Are you selling only to sales teams? in the early summer, So that's the growth plan? and the whole of APAC, right, We'd love to have you back All right, and thank you for watching.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Paul FifieldPERSON

0.99+

Mark RobergePERSON

0.99+

PaulPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

HubSpotORGANIZATION

0.99+

MITORGANIZATION

0.99+

AndrewPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey GitomerPERSON

0.99+

$1,000QUANTITY

0.99+

LondonLOCATION

0.99+

500%QUANTITY

0.99+

AustraliaLOCATION

0.99+

Sales Impact AcademyORGANIZATION

0.99+

IstanbulLOCATION

0.99+

22 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

UKLOCATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

5:00 PMDATE

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

HubSpot VenturesORGANIZATION

0.99+

40 trillionQUANTITY

0.99+

Jack WelchPERSON

0.99+

$40 trillionQUANTITY

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

15 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

Zig ZiglarPERSON

0.99+

Earl NightingalePERSON

0.99+

82QUANTITY

0.99+

Emerge EducationORGANIZATION

0.99+

two companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

AucklandLOCATION

0.99+

two slotsQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

4: 00 PMDATE

0.99+

25QUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

eight o'clockDATE

0.99+

$22MQUANTITY

0.99+

four hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

Jay PoPERSON

0.99+

one timeQUANTITY

0.99+

millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

260 customersQUANTITY

0.99+

20 million peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

HawaiiLOCATION

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

over 3000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

AlexPERSON

0.99+

Stage 2 CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

400QUANTITY

0.99+

EachQUANTITY

0.99+

6%QUANTITY

0.98+

3QUANTITY

0.98+

end of JanuaryDATE

0.98+

eightQUANTITY

0.98+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.98+

MondayDATE

0.98+

TAMORGANIZATION

0.98+

Dale CarnegiePERSON

0.98+

tonightDATE

0.98+

Thousands of piecesQUANTITY

0.98+

one specific hourQUANTITY

0.98+

each yearQUANTITY

0.98+

GitHubORGANIZATION

0.97+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.97+

almost 15,000 professionalsQUANTITY

0.97+

secondQUANTITY

0.97+

over two weeksQUANTITY

0.97+

SDR1TITLE

0.97+

5XQUANTITY

0.96+

Reza Honarmand, Tech Data | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

>>Hey, welcome back everyone to the cubes coverage of Avis reinvent 2021 here in Las Vegas. Um, John, for your host, the Q with my coach, Dave Nicholson cloud analyst here with SiliconANGLE in the queue. We've got a great guest Rez, the honor, man, SVP cloud hyperscalers transformation TD. Synnex welcome to the cube. Thanks for coming on resident. Hey, >>Good morning. Good >>Morning to you guys. You guys just had this big acquisition with billions and billions of dollars in revenue. Take us through, what are you guys do for set the table for the, for the company? Right. >>Okay. Yeah, it is a pretty big one. Uh, we're now foot number 60 on the fortune 100, um, worldwide revenues around just under $60 billion. Uh, we represent somewhere in the region of, uh, 1500 vendors and OEMs and uh, in over a hundred countries. And, uh, we serve over a hundred thousand parts, 150,000 partners now worldwide. So you got everything from the, uh, end points, style products, uh, all the way up to, uh, data center cloud, serving from the retail to SMB, to VARs going go all the way to enterprise specialists, NSIs. So DD >>And X, big company, you won't global reach. You hit everybody. Basically you T you sell a lot of products, software, hardware, you name it. Cloud is here. What is the big trend that you guys are seeing with cloud? Because you you're innate. You're, you're talking to all the customers, you have a lot of services and you have products. You represent a lot of different brands. How are people rolling them together? Are they composing cloud what's? What are you seeing in the global landscape? >>Um, we specialize in cloud. They've been doing that for a number of years and actually depending on where partners are within the journey, uh, they will have different levels of specialization. And, um, the way we like to look at it is a matrix, um, in terms of where is the complexity of the product that they're trying to take to market, um, versus what is the size and their own maturity. So we, uh, tune our services and our support for those partners to help them better understand and onboard all of that technology and address it towards their partners. Um, so if you can imagine, um, you got many, many announcements that were made here, right? And our partners have to consume all of that information, all of that technology and learn how to use it. And that's where we come in. We, we, we effectively act as the bridge to help them get up there, running and lower the barrier of entry for them to execute >>On those products and they want to add services to it all. Good. Cloud's perfect for that. So what's the relationship with AWS? I'm sure they're obviously enabling a lot of value. What is the relationship with AWS partner network? How do you guys, what are you guys enabled? What are you guys enabled with Amazon? >>So, um, if I give you the, uh, picture of our cloud practice builder, that's a good place to start. Our cloud practice builder program starts with, um, looking at the partner, understanding what is their maturity in that path specifically related to the technologies that they want to work on with AWS. And, um, we look at them in terms of have they got the sales capability, have they got the operational capability, the financial setup, and, um, really helped them then on that journey. So, um, so yeah, we, um, can go very, very deep, uh, where we have our own cohorts who help those partners get up to speed with, >>Do a little, you gotta do a little vetting, you gotta make sure people have the right capabilities. And certain people have certain orientation to certain things, maybe levels of certification. Yep. Is there a swim lanes developing in the partner network that you guys are working with? Big trends, they specializing more in application modernization. Is it more infrastructure or what are you guys seeing in terms of the trends? >>There are multiple, uh, uh trend-setter. So as you say, we have one lane specifically for our ifs. Um, one lane for our, um, uh, people who host with infrastructure. We are, um, you know, obviously data centers, one of our biggest focus areas. Um, and, um, so each of our partners goes into a specific lane specifically related to where they want to focus on. So if you consider for instance, um, somewhere in the area of, uh, ISV ISBNs, um, the primary thing that many of the ISV is out there don't have is the ability to understand all of the AWS programs. So we help them understand that, understand how they can get the most optimal, uh, cost and program with AWS. And then you get into, you get into the next level, which is around, um, uh, their cloud operations, how they actually transact with us. Uh, and you can, you can build a stack, you get into security and then you get a well architected frameworks. So this is just one of the swim lanes that you could effectively go, and we can help, help build them, build that out for them. >>Yeah. So, so Raza draw a little map for me, a sort of a mental map from the perspective of an end user customer say, I'm a very large organization, I've got a large it footprint. I'm looking towards modernizing in the future. How am I engaging with what TD Synnex is actually delivering to the market? We've been talking about partners. So give us a hypothetical again, I'm the customer who is, who's the sales rep. Who's calling on me initially, how am I interacting with you versus the partner? And I know that there are a variety of ways, but give me, give us an example. I want to make sure that people watching this understand cause we use the term partner to me in a whole variety of different things. >>Yeah. Very, very good question. Cause, uh, he is index is one of the biggest companies that the vast majority of the consumers out there have inherited, right? Yeah. We are for number 600 fortune 100. Now most organization deal with a local. It trusted it partner that trusted it partner, um, then is who they would go to, whether it is their infrastructure, whether there is there, uh, um, security that we work with that partner, um, to help them manage it. Now, what we do is really support the partner to have the knowledge they need to have the expertise. They need to have the services that they need to have the solutions that they need to have to deploy those technologies. Um, with that customer. Now, in majority of the cases, the customer will never come in contact with us because we are behind the scenes supporting our partners. >>However, increasingly we are seeing three motions that we work with. One is with our partners, we do sell to right partner, knows what they want. They've worked with the customer, they've established a need. Um, they come to us and we help them deliver that technology. We do a cell width. So this is the part where you're talking about more of the newer technologies, where the partner may be lacking some of that expertise. So this is where are our experts and give you an idea. We have over 300 certifications just in the last year with AWS, um, where our experts would then help the partner actually land that technology with the customer. And then the ultimate level is a sell for you're talking about longer sales cycles, very complex, where they really need to get deep. So we have our own, um, experience centers, uh, customer immersion, uh, uh, programs where the customer actually comes to us with a partner where we then help them actually get through that process. >>So you're a multi-tiered distribution system. You provide service layer to the frontline partners before the end-users provide support and it software technology and, and executive services for them to serve their customer because they're probably not staffed up. They don't have the resources, they have a good business model and they want to make a lot of money. They >>Do, they do. And, um, they have good gross >>Profit margins. >>I hope so. I hope we, we, we help them actually deliver better profit margins and as they move to services and recurring revenues with cloud that becomes more predictable and sustainable for them as well. >>Well, just, I was kidding, but I'm, I'm serious. I want to get into this gross margin because think one of the things that you're bringing up with this question is if I'm a re a partner and I'm talking to an end-user, I might, I want to make a lot of profits. So services are naturally important. I make more gross profit on services. So if you have volume discounts on things that I might not have that volume discount, if I'm going direct to the manufacturer or a platform you provide that, is that right? Like getting that right, that you guys get, provide that discount pass through. >>We do. Um, we laid up, yes, we get a lot of support through their programs. They announced many programs this week, for instance, and as the partner gains more specializations and they gain access to more support through us, they also gain access to some preferred, um, uh, pricing. So to an extent it's about volume. It's also about how deep they go, how, how, how much they invest in their own expertise. So really is a, uh, not just a volume game, but it's a quality game as well. >>Operational value that you provide because you guys must have a lot of programs that pass through to the partner, uh, software systems. What kind of examples can you give if I'm the partner and I have an end-user and I have a boutique, let's just say I specialize in data analytics and whatever unique thing you're providing me services. Is there like certain software systems that you guys have? What operational support do you give to your customers? >>So in terms of the, um, technology that the consumer consumes, um, there is a whole range of technologies around data management and data analytics. Um, then if you're talking about, in terms of the support, operational support that we give to the partner, again, there's the bigger the partner, the more transactions, the more volume they do, they need to have that operational optimization as well. Again, that's where we come in and give them the tools and the technologies. They need to optimize that. >>It's going to ask you the re-invent now that we're in person again, been a year and two years since we've been to reinvent. What's the, what, what are you, what's your assessment of the show this year? What's the big takeaway, um, that you see this year, uh, that that's gonna be relevant for you? >>I, I love the way these guys, um, land some incredibly new technologies. Uh, and I love the theme of Pathfinders from yesterday. Um, so when I look at the, uh, 5g, I mean, that sounds like a game changer to me. And I think there should be a lot of partners out there thinking, hold on a minute, this is a massive opportunity for us. Um, yeah, I mean, so >>The serverless stuff is getting better and better. I mean, like >>It's, they do a good job on their announcements. There is a reason why their technologies so highly rated, uh, these guys know how to do technology. >>And I think if, if I'm, uh, I think of the services that you could roll on top of this, I mean, if you're in front of a customer big, medium or large, I mean, if I'm a developer, a service provider, I can make so much more profit by building more of these services because that pathfind opens up these net new things, 5g AI as a service, kind of the anything. >>Yeah. Um, I mean partners with they, they have their business models. They, the ones who have figured out how to wrap the services around the solutions that are out there. Um, typically we find that they are the most successful with the fastest growth rates and they kind of get themselves into very, uh, positive virtual cycle. Um, the more they can wrap around those services, the higher their value, the more margin they tend to make, the more profitable they are. And actually then they continue to invest and expand their footprint. So >>Quick advice pretend that I am about to become essentially a local trusted value added reseller partner for my end user customers. And I'm going to become a partner of your company. What would your counsel be to me about what I should focus, focus on? What's hot. What's the hottest tip of the spear right now. Yes, right now I need to go out and hire these people, >>Data, data, data, and analytics data. I would absolutely zoom in on that. Um, it is the new oil and every organization needs to have insights. And if businesses out there do not have those insights, they are at a disadvantage partners who can figure out how to build services around data. They're the guys who are really winning. >>Awesome. Great insight. Thanks for coming on the cube here at re-invent great conversation with gradients. I thanks for coming on. Appreciate it. Pleasure. Okay. Cube covers. You're watching the cube, the leader in worldwide tech coverage here in Raven. I'm Jeffrey with Dave Nicholson, host of the cube. Thanks for watching. We'll be right back.

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

We've got a great guest Rez, the honor, man, SVP cloud hyperscalers transformation TD. Good morning. Morning to you guys. serving from the retail to SMB, What are you seeing in the global landscape? the way we like to look at it is a matrix, um, in terms of where What is the relationship with AWS partner network? So, um, if I give you the, uh, picture of our cloud practice Is it more infrastructure or what are you guys seeing in terms of the trends? that many of the ISV is out there don't have is the ability to understand all of the how am I interacting with you versus the partner? they need to have the expertise. Um, they come to us and we help them deliver that They don't have the resources, they have a good business model and they want And, um, they have good gross and as they move to services and recurring revenues with cloud that becomes more predictable So if you have volume discounts on things that I the partner gains more specializations and they gain access to more support What kind of examples can you give if I'm the partner and So in terms of the, um, technology that the consumer consumes, What's the big takeaway, um, that you see this year, uh, that that's gonna be relevant that sounds like a game changer to me. I mean, like so highly rated, uh, these guys know how to do technology. And I think if, if I'm, uh, I think of the services that you could roll on top of this, I mean, Um, the more they can wrap around those And I'm going to become a partner of your company. Um, it is the new oil and every Thanks for coming on the cube here at re-invent great conversation with gradients.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

150,000 partnersQUANTITY

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Reza HonarmandPERSON

0.99+

billionsQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

1500 vendorsQUANTITY

0.99+

TD SynnexORGANIZATION

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

this weekDATE

0.99+

this yearDATE

0.99+

eachQUANTITY

0.99+

over a hundred thousand partsQUANTITY

0.98+

billions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

last yearDATE

0.98+

a yearQUANTITY

0.98+

over 300 certificationsQUANTITY

0.98+

SiliconANGLEORGANIZATION

0.98+

RezPERSON

0.97+

over a hundred countriesQUANTITY

0.97+

one laneQUANTITY

0.94+

5gORGANIZATION

0.9+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.89+

RavenLOCATION

0.89+

three motionsQUANTITY

0.87+

2021DATE

0.86+

under $60 billionQUANTITY

0.85+

SynnexORGANIZATION

0.84+

100OTHER

0.76+

600OTHER

0.75+

AvisORGANIZATION

0.73+

lanesQUANTITY

0.67+

InventEVENT

0.65+

number 60QUANTITY

0.59+

100QUANTITY

0.58+

fortuneORGANIZATION

0.51+

RazaPERSON

0.44+

fortuneQUANTITY

0.24+

Rahul Pathak, AWS | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

>>Hey, welcome back everyone. We're live here in the cube in Las Vegas Raiders reinvent 2021. I'm Jeffrey hosted the key we're in person this year. It's a hybrid event online. Great action. Going on. I'm rolling. Vice-president of ADF analytics. David is great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >>It's great to be here, John. Thanks for having me again. >>Um, so you've got a really awesome job. You've got serverless, you've got analytics. You're in the middle of all the action for AWS. What's the big news. What are you guys announcing? What's going on? >>Yeah, well, it's been an awesome reinvent for us. Uh, we've had a number of several us analytics launches. So red shift, our petabyte scale data warehouse, EMR for open source analytics. Uh, and then we've also had, uh, managed streaming for Kafka go serverless and then on demand for Kinesis. And then a couple of other big ones. We've got RO and cell based security for AWS lake formation. So you can get really fine grain controls over your data lakes and then asset transactions. You can actually have a inserts, updates and deletes on data lakes, which is a big step forward. >>Uh, so Swami on stage and the keynote he's actually finishing up now. But even last night I saw him in the hallway. We were talking about as much as about AI. Of course, he's got the AI title, but AI is the outcome. It's the application of all the data and this and a new architecture. He said on stage just now like, Hey, it's not about the old databases from the nineties, right? There's multiple data stores now available. And there's the unification is the big trend. And he said something interesting. Governance can be an advantage, not an inhibitor. This is kind of this new horizontally scalable, um, kind of idea that enables the vertical specialization around machine learning to be effective. It's not a new architecture, but it's now becoming more popular. People are realizing it. It's sort of share your thoughts on this whole not shift, but the acceleration of horizontally scalable and vertically integrated. Yeah, >>No, I think the way Swami put it is exactly right. What you want is the right tool for the right job. And you want to be able to deliver that to customers. So you're not compromising on performance or functionality of scale, but then you wanted all of these to be interconnected. So they're, well-integrated, you can stay in your favorite interface and take advantage of other technologies. So you can have things like Redshift integrated with Sage makers, you get analytics and machine learning. And then in Swami's absolutely right. Governance is actually an enabler of velocity. Once you've got the right guardrails in place, you can actually set people free because they can innovate. You don't have to be in the way, but you know that your data is protected. It's being used in the way that you expect by the people that you are allowing to use that data. And so it becomes a very powerful way for customers to set data free. And then, because things are elastic and serverless, uh, you can really just match capacity with demand. And so as you see spikes in usage, the system can scale out as those dwindle, they can scale back down, and it just becomes a very efficient way for customers to operate with data at scale >>Every year it reinvented. So it was kind of like a pinch me moment. It's like, well, more that's really good technology. Oh my God, it's getting easier and easier. As the infrastructure as code becomes more programmable, it's becoming easier, more Lambda, more serverless action. Uh, you got new offerings. How are customers benefiting for instance, from the three new offerings that you guys announced here? What specifically is the value proposition that you guys are putting out there? Yeah, so the, >>Um, you know, as we've tried to do with AWS over the years, customers get to focus on the things that really differentiate them and differentiate their businesses. So we take away in Redshift serverless, for example, all of the work that's needed to manage clusters, provision them, scale them, optimize them. Uh, and that's all been automated and made invisible to customers, the customers to think about data, what they want to do with it, what insights they can derive from it. And they know they're getting the most efficient infrastructure possible to make that a reality for them with high performance and low costs. So, uh, better results, more ability to focus on what differentiates their business and lower cost structure over time. >>Yeah. I had the essential guys on it's interesting. They had part of the soul cloud. Continuous is their word for what Adam was saying is clouds everywhere. And they're saying it's faster to match what you want to do with the outcomes, but the capabilities and outcomes kind of merging together where it's easy to say, this is what we want to do. And here's the outcome it supports that's right with that. What are some of the key trends on those outcomes that you see with the data analytics that's most popular right now? And kind of where's that, where's that going? >>Yeah. I mean, I think what we've seen is that data's just becoming more and more critical and top of mind for customers and, uh, you know, the pandemic has also accelerated that we found that customers are really looking to data and analytics and machine learning to find new opportunities. How can they, uh, really expand their business, take advantage of what's happening? And then the other part is how can they find efficiencies? And so, um, really everything that we're trying to do is we're trying to connect it to business outcomes for customers. How can you deepen your relationship with your customers? How can you create new customer experiences and how can you do that more efficiently, uh, with more agility and take advantage of, uh, the ability to be flexible. And you know, what is a very unpredictable world, as we've seen, >>I noticed a lot of purpose-built discussion going on in the keynote with Swami as well. How are you creating this next layer of what I call purpose-built platform like features? I mean, tools are great. You see a lot of tools in the data market tools are tools of your hammer. You want to look for a nail. We see people over by too many tools and you have ultimately a platform, but this seems to be a new trend where there's this connect phenomenon was showing me that you've got these platform capabilities that people can build on top of it, because there's a huge ecosystem of data tools out there that you guys have as partners that want to snap together. So the trend is things are starting to snap together, less primitive, roll your own, which you can do, but there's now more easier ways. Take me through that. Explain that, unpack that that phenomenon role rolling your own firm is, which has been the way now to here. Here's, here's some prefabricated software go. >>Yeah. Um, so it's a great observation and you're absolutely right. I mean, I think there's some customers that want to roll their own and they'll start with instances, they'll install software, they'll write their own code, build their own bespoke systems. And, uh, and we provide what the customers need to do that. But I think increasingly you're starting to see these higher level abstractions that take away all of that detail. And mark has Adam put it and allow customers to compose these. And we think it's important when you do that, uh, to be modular. So customers don't have to have these big bang all or nothing approaches you can pick what's appropriate, uh, but you're never on a dead end. You can always evolve and scale as you need to. And then you want to bring these ideas of unified governance and cohesive interfaces across so that customers find it easy to adopt the next thing. And so you can start off say with batch analytics, you can expand into real time. You can bring in machine learning and predictive capabilities. You can add natural language, and it's a big ecosystem of managed services as well as third parties and partners. >>And what's interesting. I want to get your thoughts while I got you here, because I think this is such an important trend and historic moment in time, Jerry chin, who one of the smartest VCs that we know from Greylock and coin castles in the cloud, which kind of came out of a cube conversation here in the queue years ago, where we saw the movement of that someone's going to build real value on AWS, not just an app. And you see the rise of the snowflakes and Databricks and other companies. And he was pointing out that you can get a very narrow wedge and get a position with these platforms, build on top of them and then build value. And I think that's, uh, the number one question people ask me, it's like, okay, how do I build value on top of these analytic packages? So if I'm a startup or I'm a big company, I also want to leverage these high level abstractions and build on top of it. How do you talk about that? How do you explain that? Because that's what people kind of want to know is like, okay, is it enabling me or do I have to fend for myself later? This is kind of, it comes up a lot. >>That's a great question. And, um, you know, if you saw, uh, Goldman's announcement this week, which is about bringing, building their cloud on top of AWS, it's a great example of using our capabilities in terms of infrastructure and analytics and machine learning to really allow them to take what's value added about Goldman and their position to financial markets, to build something value, add, and create a ton of value for Goldman, uh, by leveraging the things that we offer. And to us, that's an ideal outcome because it's a win-win for us in Goldman, but it's also a win for Goldman and their customers. >>That's what we call the Supercloud that's the opportunity. So is there a lot of Goldmans opportunities out there? Is that just a, these unicorns, are these sites? I mean, how do you, I mean, that's Goldman Sachs, they're huge. Is there, is this open to everybody? >>Absolutely. I mean, that's been one of the, uh, you know, one of the core ideas behind AWS was we wanted to give anybody any developer access to the same technology that the world's largest corporations had. And, uh, that's what you have today. The things that Goldman uses to build that cloud are available to anybody. And you can start for a few pennies scale up, uh, you know, into the petabytes and beyond >>When I was talking to Adams, Lipski when I met with him prior to re-invent, I noticed that he was definitely had an affinity towards the data, obviously he's Amazonia, but he spent time at Tableau. So, so as he's running that company, so you see that kind of mindset of the data advantage. So I have to ask you, because it's something that I've been talking about for a while and I'm waiting for it to emerge, but I'm not sure it's going to happen yet. But what infrastructure is code was for dev ops and then dev sec ops, there's almost like a data ops developing where data as code or programmable data. If I can connect the dots of what Swami's saying, what you're doing is this is like a new horizontal layer of data of freely available data with some government governance built in that's right. So it's, data's being baked into everything. So data is any ingredient, not a query to some database, it's gotta be baked into the apps, that's data as code that's. Right. So it's almost a data DevOps kind of vibe. >>Yeah, no, you're absolutely right. And you know, you've seen it with things like ML ops and so on. It's all the special case of dev ops. But what you're really trying to do is to get programmatic and systematic about how you deal with data. And it's not just data that you have. It's also publicly available data sets and it's customers sharing with each other. So building the ecosystem, our data, and we've got things like our open data program where we've got publicly hosted data sets or things like the AWS data exchange where customers can actually monetize data. So it's not just data as code, but now data as a monetizeable asset. So it's a really exciting time to be in the data business. >>Yeah. And I think it's so many too. So I've got to ask you while I got you here since you're an expert. Um, okay. Here's my problem. I have a lot of data. I'm nervous about it. I want to secure it. So if I try to secure it, I'm not making it available. So I want to feed the machine learning. How do I create an architecture where I can make it freely available, but yet maintain the control and the comfort that this is going to be secure. So what products do I buy? >>Yeah. So, uh, you know, a great place to start at as three. Um, you know, it's one of the best places for data lakes, uh, for all the reasons. That's why we talked about your ability scale costs. You can then use lake formation to really protect and govern that data so you can decide who's allowed to see it and what they're allowed to see, and you don't have to create multiple copies. So you can define that, you know, this group of partners can see a, B and C. This group can see D E and F and the system enforces that. And you have a central point of control where you can monitor what's happening. And if you want to change your mind, you can do that instantly. And all access can be locked down that you've got a variety of encryption capabilities with things like KMS. And so you can really lock down your data, but yet keep it open to the parties that you want and give them specifically the access that you want to give them. And then once you've done that, they're free to use that data, according to the rules that you defined with the analytics tools that we offer to go drive value, create insight, and do something >>That's lake formation. And then you got a Thena querying. Yes, we got all kinds of tooling on top of it. >>It's all right. You can have, uh, Athena query and your data in S3 lake formation, protecting it. And then SageMaker is integrated with Athena. So you can pull that data into SageMaker for machine learning, interrogate that data, using natural language with things like QuickSight Q a like we demoed. So just a ton of power without having to really think too deeply about, uh, developing expert skill sets in this. >>So the next question I want to ask you is because that first part of the great, great, great description, thank you very much. Now, 5g in the edges here, outpost, how was the analytics going on that as edge becomes more pervasive in the architecture? >>Yeah, it's going to be a key part of this ecosystem and it's really a continuum. So, uh, you know, we find customers are collecting data at the edge. They might be making local ML or inference type decisions on edge devices, or, you know, automobiles, for example. Uh, but typically that data with some point will come back into the cloud, into S3 will be used to do heavy duty training, and then those models get pushed back out to the edge. And then some of the things that we've done in Athena, for example, with federated query, as long as you have a network path, and you can understand what the data format or the database is, you can actually run a query on that data. So you can run real-time queries on data, wherever it lives, whether it's on an edge device, on an outpost, in a local zone or in your cloud region and combine all of that together in one place. >>Yeah. And I think having that data copies everywhere is a big thing deal. I've got to ask you now that we're here at reinvent, what's your take we're back in person last year was all virtual. Finally, not 60,000 people, like a couple of years ago, it's still 27,000 people here, all lining up for the sessions, all having a great time. Um, all good. What's the most important story from your, your area that people should pay attention to? What's the headline, what's the top news? What should people pay attention to? >>Yeah, so I think first off it is awesome to be back in person. It's just so fun to see customers and to see, I mean, you, like, we've been meeting here over the years and it's, it's great to so much energy in person. It's been really nice. Uh, you know, I think from an analytics perspective, there's just been a ton of innovation. I think the core idea for us is we want to make it easy for customers to use the right tool for the right job to get insight from all of their data as cost effectively as possible. And I think, uh, you know, I think if customers walk away and think about it as being, it's now easier than ever for me to take advantage of everything that AWS has to offer, uh, to make sense of all the data that I'm generating and use it to drive business value, but I think we'll have done our jobs. Right. >>What's the coolest thing that you're seeing here is that the serverless innovation, is it, um, the new abstraction layer with data high level services in your mind? What's the coolest thing. Got it. >>It's hard to pick the coolest that sticks like kicking the candies. I mean, I think the, uh, you know, the continued innovation in terms of, uh, performance and functionality in each of our services is a big deal. I think serverless is a game changer for customers. Uh, and then I think really the infusion of machine learning throughout all of these systems. So things like Redshift ML, Athena ML, Pixar, Q a just really enabling new experiences for customers, uh, in a way that's easier than it ever has been. And I think that's a, that's a big deal and I'm really excited to see what customers do with it. >>Yeah. And I think the performance thing to me, the coolest thing that I'm seeing is the graviton three and the gravitron progression with the custom stacks with all this ease of use, it's just going to be just a real performance advantage and the costs are getting lowered. So I think the ECE two instances around the compute is phenomenal. No, >>Absolutely. I mean, I think the hardware and Silicon innovation is huge and it's not just performance. It's also the energy efficiency. It's a big deal for the future reality. >>We're at an inflection point where this modern applications are being built. And in my history, I'm old, my birthday is today. I'm in my fifties. So I remember back in the eighties, every major inflection point when there was a shift in how things were developed from mainframe client server, PC inter network, you name it every time the apps change, the app owners, app developers all went to the best platform processing. And so I think, you know, that idea of system software applications being bundled together, um, is a losing formula. I think you got to have that decoupling large-scale was seeing that with cloud. And I think now if I'm an app developer, whether whether I'm in a large ISV in your ecosystem or in the APN partner or a startup, I'm going to go with my software runs the best period and where I can create value. That's right. I get distribution, I create value and it runs fast. I mean, that's, I mean, it's pretty simple. So I think the ecosystem is going to be a big action for the next couple of years. >>Absolutely. Right. And I mean, the ecosystem's huge and I think, um, and we're also grateful to have all these partners here. It's a huge deal for us. And I think it really matters for customers >>What's on your roadmap this year, what you got going on. What can you share a little bit of a trajectory without kind of, uh, breaking the rules of the Amazonian, uh, confidentiality. Um, what's, what's the focus for the year? What do you what's next? >>Well, you know, as you know, we're always talking to customers and, uh, I think we're going to make things better, faster, cheaper, easier to use. And, um, I think you've seen some of the things that we're doing with integration now, you'll see more of that. And, uh, really the goal is how can customers get value as quickly as possible for as low cost as possible? That's how we went to >>Yeah. They're in the longterm. Yeah. We've always say every time we see each other data is at the center of the value proposition. I've been saying that for 10 years now, it's actually the value proposition, powering AI. And you're seeing because of it, the rise of superclouds and then the superclouds are emerging. I think you guys are the under innings of these emerging superclouds. And so it's a huge treading, the Goldman Sachs things of validation. So again, more data, the better, sorry, cool things happening. >>It is just it's everywhere. And the, uh, the diversity of use cases is amazing. I mean, I think from, you know, the Australia swimming team to, uh, to formula one to NASDAQ, it's just incredible to see what our >>Customers do. We see the great route. Good to see you. Thanks for coming on the cube. >>Pleasure to be here as always John. Great to see you. Thank you. Yeah. >>Thanks for, thanks for sharing. All of the data is the key to the success. Data is the value proposition. You've seen the rise of superclouds because of the data advantage. If you can expose it, protect it and govern it, unleashes creativity and opportunities for entrepreneurs and businesses. Of course, you got to have the scale and the price performance. That's what doing this is the cube coverage. You're watching the leader in worldwide tech coverage here in person for any of us reinvent 2021 I'm John ferry. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

David is great to see you. It's great to be here, John. What are you guys announcing? So you can get really fine grain controls over your data lakes and then asset transactions. It's the application of all the data and this and a new architecture. And so as you see spikes in usage, the system can scale out How are customers benefiting for instance, from the three new offerings that you guys announced the customers to think about data, what they want to do with it, what insights they can derive from it. And they're saying it's faster to match what you want to do with the outcomes, And you know, what is a very unpredictable world, as we've seen, tools out there that you guys have as partners that want to snap together. So customers don't have to have these big bang all or nothing approaches you can pick And he was pointing out that you can get a very narrow wedge and get a position And, um, you know, if you saw, uh, Goldman's announcement this week, Is there, is this open to everybody? I mean, that's been one of the, uh, you know, one of the core ideas behind AWS was we wanted to give so you see that kind of mindset of the data advantage. And it's not just data that you have. So I've got to ask you while I got you here since you're an expert. And so you can really lock down your data, but yet And then you got a Thena querying. So you can pull that data into SageMaker for machine learning, So the next question I want to ask you is because that first part of the great, great, great description, thank you very much. data format or the database is, you can actually run a query on that data. I've got to ask you now that we're here at reinvent, And I think, uh, you know, I think if customers walk away and think about it as being, What's the coolest thing that you're seeing here is that the serverless innovation, I think the, uh, you know, the continued innovation in terms of, uh, So I think the ECE two instances around the compute is phenomenal. It's a big deal for the future reality. And so I think, you know, And I think it really matters for customers What can you share a little bit of a trajectory without kind of, Well, you know, as you know, we're always talking to customers and, uh, I think we're going to make things better, I think you guys are the under innings of these emerging superclouds. I mean, I think from, you know, the Australia swimming team to, uh, to formula one to NASDAQ, Thanks for coming on the cube. Great to see you. All of the data is the key to the success.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavidPERSON

0.99+

GoldmanORGANIZATION

0.99+

Rahul PathakPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Goldman SachsORGANIZATION

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

Jerry chinPERSON

0.99+

NASDAQORGANIZATION

0.99+

AthenaLOCATION

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

60,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

27,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

John ferryPERSON

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.98+

KafkaTITLE

0.98+

SwamiPERSON

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

ADF analyticsORGANIZATION

0.97+

AmazoniaORGANIZATION

0.97+

eightiesDATE

0.97+

PixarORGANIZATION

0.97+

fiftiesQUANTITY

0.97+

eachQUANTITY

0.97+

three new offeringsQUANTITY

0.96+

RedshiftTITLE

0.96+

first partQUANTITY

0.96+

this yearDATE

0.96+

last nightDATE

0.95+

LipskiPERSON

0.94+

couple of years agoDATE

0.94+

next couple of yearsDATE

0.94+

SageORGANIZATION

0.93+

GoldmansORGANIZATION

0.92+

pandemicEVENT

0.92+

this weekDATE

0.92+

DatabricksORGANIZATION

0.9+

one placeQUANTITY

0.9+

markPERSON

0.88+

SupercloudORGANIZATION

0.87+

TableauORGANIZATION

0.84+

S3TITLE

0.84+

5gQUANTITY

0.8+

Athena MLORGANIZATION

0.78+

AthenaORGANIZATION

0.78+

RaidersORGANIZATION

0.77+

years agoDATE

0.75+

ninetiesDATE

0.74+

MLORGANIZATION

0.73+

AdamsPERSON

0.73+

two instancesQUANTITY

0.72+

LambdaTITLE

0.71+

ThenaORGANIZATION

0.71+

SageMakerTITLE

0.66+

VegasLOCATION

0.66+

InventEVENT

0.64+

VicePERSON

0.63+

graviton threeOTHER

0.62+

AustraliaLOCATION

0.59+

LasORGANIZATION

0.59+

KinesisTITLE

0.57+

AmazonianORGANIZATION

0.56+

Raj Pai, AWS | AWS EC2 Day 2021


 

(upbeat rhythmic music) >> Everyone, I'm John Furrier with theCUBE here at Palo Alto on a remote interview for a special video interview. The EC2 15th birthday party celebration event. Raj Pai, who's the Vice President of EC2 Product Management AWS is here with me. Congratulations on Amazon Web Services, EC2 with the compute. What a journey. 15 years old. Soon we got the keys to the car at a couple more years. So Raj, great to see you. You guys have been doing great work. Congratulations. >> Thank you. It's great being here. It's super exciting for me too. I can't believe it's 15 years and you know that big, we're still at the very beginning as you know, that we often say. >> The building blocks that have been there from the beginning really set the table, and it's just been fun to watch the innovation on behalf of customers that you guys have done at AWS and more, and for entrepreneurs and for developers, it just continues to be great and the edge is right on the corner. Wavelength, all the great stuff. But let's talk about the specific topic here that I really want to drill into is that as you look at the 15th year and birthday for EC2, okay? You're looking at the future as well. You're looking at the past, present and future. And one of the things that's most compelling about recent re-invent was the Graviton performance numbers are amazing. You guys have been building custom silicon for a while. You also worked with Intel and AMD. What is it about? What's the huge investment for you guys? Where do you started to see some returns? Are you seeing returns? And then why did AWS decide to build its own processors? >> Yeah, now, that's a really good question. And I mean, like with everything else we do in AWS, it's all about innovating on behalf of our customers. And one of the things our customers are telling us, that they continue to tell us is they want to see better performance at lower prices. And we've been able to deliver that with our hardware partners for the last 15 years. But as we've understood the workloads that run on EC2 and AWS, we saw an opportunity. Like, what if we were going to go and design our own processor that was really optimized for the sort of workload that customers run on the Cloud? And make design decisions when designing the CPU and the system and the chip around the CPU that does things like bring a lot more core local cache and speed up the parts of the operations that really benefit real-world workload. So, this isn't about benchmarks. It's about how do real world workloads perform and how do we build systems that optimize that performance? And with Graviton, we were able to hit the nail on the head. We were also very pleasantly surprised when we got our first chips off the line. And we're seeing that a customer, like about 40% performance improvement at significantly lower cost. And that's super exciting. And that's one of the reasons we're getting so much interest from our customers. >> I got to say as a geek and a tech nerd, I love the silicon development. And there's benefits there, also the performance is there. The thing that also is pretty obvious that's happening is and the world seeing it is the shift towards ARM-based computing. What kinds of customers and use cases are you seeing adopt to Graviton? And what kind of workloads were they running on? What are the things that surprise you guys, that didn't surprise me. Did you guys always talk about the upcheck and how everyone's leveraging it? What are some of the examples? Take us through some of the customers, use cases, workloads. What's surprising you and what's going on with Graviton? >> Yes, so I think that the biggest surprise for us is how broadly applicable it's been. So one of the things we did, we launched with reinvent is like we have different form factors of compute. We have memory-optimized instances that are good for databases and in memory caches. We have compute optimized for HPC and workloads that really take advantage of the performance of the chip and then we have general purpose workloads. And we we introduced Graviton variants of all those instance families And we're actually seeing the same sort of performance benefits across workload. So, and it's one of the reasons why companies like Metrol, and Snap and SmugMug, they move one workload over, they see the performance benefit and before you know it, they're starting to move workloads and mass over across kind of that spectrum. So, I think that's one of the biggest surprises is that Graviton seems to do well across a wide range and we're going to keep on introducing it more and more of instance families, because we've seen this uptick well. >> You're seeing a lot of people move to the Graviton. You mentioned a few of those early adopters who were pushing the envelope, and they're always kind of trotted out there as examples at reinvent, which is always fun to see what they're working on next. And now is that people see the Graviton2 instances, okay, the architecture's different, higher performance. How much effort do our customers typically need to move to Graviton2 instances? And what are some of the benefits they're seeing on performance and price performance? Can you talk about that transition? Because that's natural evolution for them. >> Yeah. It's actually a lot less than they originally think. So, some of the hardest effort is just getting them over the line to try it. So, one of the things that we tell our customers who are considering Graviton is it just takes one or two developers take one workload and go off for a couple of weeks and just try reporting it to Graviton. And more often than not, they come back to us in four or five days. They're like, it works. And we just had to do some testing and verification, but we were able to afford it because, you know, the operating system support was there, the ISP support was there and the tools that they use, and they're using most cases, modern programming languages like Python or Go or Java or PhD where, you know, interpret the language and it just run. And so there's very little lift in comparison to what people think it's going to be. And that's one of the reasons that, you know, one of the big announcements we made in the last few weeks is what we're calling the Graviton challenge, right? So it's a set of blueprints for customers to essentially have best practices on how to in four days take, you know, a piece of code and piece of that workload and execute it and run it and migrate it to the Graviton. And we're seeing a lot of interest in that as people in the community realize how easy that actually is. >> What are some of the cool price performance things that are emerging? Obviously it makes sense if you don't really need it, don't pay for it, but you have that option. A lot of people are going there. Is there a wave you see coming that Graviton2 is going to be really set up for that you kind of see some early signals coming in, Raj? Because, I can see the 64 bit. I can see where Graviton fits today. Obviously, performance is key. Is it certain things that are emerging? What's the main problems that it solves? >> Well, I think anything that's a multi-threaded architecture is going to do really well in Graviton because of the, we have really densely packed 64 course. And so you're going to see things like microservices and containers and workloads that are more, that are able to take advantage of that parallel execution do really, really well. And so, we say 40% performance improvement, but like, when our customers have gone and tried this, they've seen upwards of 50% depending on the workload. So yeah, it's going to be more your multi-threaded application. There's some applications that may not be a fit, like it can give a legacy, you know, for example, like, there's some software that hasn't yet been moved over and we're going to continue to invest super heavily in our whole ecosystem of hardware, for the longterm. So I think that because there's a great option and we just encourage them to try it. And then they'll learn from their experience what works and what doesn't. >> Wow. 15th birthday. Still growing up and it's starting to get more mature. You're the VP of Product Management. You have the keys to the kingdom. So, you have wide-ranging responsibilities. Share with us if you can. I know that you really can't say much, but try to give a little bit of teaser. You got Wavelength. I can see the dots connecting at the edge. You got Outposts, so we see all that emerging. I can almost imagine that this is going to get stronger. What should people think about? Where's the headroom for EC2 with Graviton and Graviton2? >> Yeah, I know. I think like, a new architect (mumbles) yourself. But like, our goal is to have AWS kind of everywhere our customers are. And that means the full power of AWS. So, I think you're going to see more and more of us having EC2 in compute capacity, wherever customers need it. That could be in an Outpost. That could be on their 5G network. That could be in a city right next to them, right? And you're going to see us continue to offer the variety, the selection of instances and platforms in all those locations as well. So, I think the key for us is to be ubiquitous and have compute power everywhere our customers need it, in the form factors they need it. >> That's awesome. Congratulations. I love the power. You can't go wrong with sending computers where the data is, where the customers are. AWS, Amazon Web Services. Building their own custom silicon with Graviton2 processors. This is EC2 continuing to grow up. Raj Pai, Vice President of EC2 Product Management. Thank you for coming on and sharing the update and congratulations on the 15th birthday to EC2. >> Yeah, thanks for having me. It's been great. Have a great Friday. >> All right. Great. I'm Jeffrey with theCUBE. You're watching theCUBE coverage of EC2's 15th birthday event. Thanks for watching. (soft rhythmic music)

Published Date : Aug 24 2021

SUMMARY :

So Raj, great to see you. that we often say. And one of the things And one of the things our and the world seeing it is the shift So, and it's one of the reasons why And now is that people see And that's one of the Because, I can see the 64 bit. that are able to take advantage You have the keys to the kingdom. And that means the full power of AWS. the 15th birthday to EC2. Have a great Friday. of EC2's 15th birthday event.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Raj PaiPERSON

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

AMDORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

40%QUANTITY

0.99+

RajPERSON

0.99+

PythonTITLE

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

MetrolORGANIZATION

0.99+

JavaTITLE

0.99+

SmugMugORGANIZATION

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

SnapORGANIZATION

0.99+

five daysQUANTITY

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

first chipsQUANTITY

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

FridayDATE

0.99+

two developersQUANTITY

0.99+

EC2ORGANIZATION

0.98+

15th yearQUANTITY

0.98+

64 bitQUANTITY

0.98+

15th birthdayQUANTITY

0.97+

GravitonORGANIZATION

0.97+

GoTITLE

0.97+

about 40%QUANTITY

0.97+

four daysQUANTITY

0.95+

EC2TITLE

0.93+

15 years oldQUANTITY

0.9+

64 courseQUANTITY

0.89+

todayDATE

0.87+

Graviton2COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.86+

Graviton2TITLE

0.85+

WavelengthTITLE

0.85+

15th birthday eventQUANTITY

0.83+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.83+

couple more yearsQUANTITY

0.82+

last 15 yearsDATE

0.82+

GravitonTITLE

0.81+

Vice PresidentPERSON

0.8+

EC2EVENT

0.79+

lastDATE

0.65+

EC2 Day 2021EVENT

0.64+

GravitonCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.53+

weeksDATE

0.49+

Cloud City Live Kickoff with Danielle Royston | Cloud City Live 2021


 

>>Hello everyone. Thank you, add appreciating the studio. We're here at the cube here in cloud city telco DRS Cloud city. I'm Jeffrey Day Volonte. We're here for the next three days. Wall to wall live coverage. It's a physical event with a virtual program. It's hybrid. We're here with Daniel Royston, the Ceo of telco D. R. And the acting Ceo Toby, which is announced today. Great >>to see you. It's awesome to see you guys. >>Awesome to see how you doing, how you >>Feeling? I'm feeling congratulations. Right. 101 days ago, I didn't even think this doesn't exist. Right. And we got in contact with you guys and we said we knew there was always going to be a big virtual component and we invited you guys and here we are together. It's insane. >>Well we did the preview videos, but we're kind of walking through and document in the early stages. It all came together beautifully spectacular For the folks watching behind us is the most spectacular build out clouds. It's an ecosystem open concept. It feels like the Apple store meets paradise. Of course. We got the cube here in the set and we got the studio with all the command and control of adam there. So I gotta ask you with the connected keynotes going on right now. The connected world. Yeah. It's connected. We all know that everyone knows that what's, what's different now real quick before we get into the program, what's going on? >>Yeah. I think a big part of my messages and advocating it's more than just the network, Right? And I think telcos forever have relied on. That's all it is. That's what it's about. And I'm like, nope, you guys got to start focusing on your subscribers, right? And so the over the top players keep coming in and siphoning away their revenue and it's time for them to start focusing on us, right and making experience great. And I think that's what this is all about. >>So we're gonna get the news but I want to toss it to Katie. The roving reporter is going to give it a detail on how it all came together. So Katie take it away. >>Mhm We're here in Barcelona and so excited to be back in this beautiful city over at the convention center. The team is working hard putting the finishing touches to tell Cody are amazing cloud city booth at MwC Barcelona 2021. I'm sure you know the story of how this all came together as one of the biggest vendors Erickson pulled out of M. W. C. With just over 100 days until the start of the event. When this happened last year, it kicked off a tidal wave of departures and MwC was called off this year. We all wondered if MWC was going to be cancelled again and that's when Daniel Royston Ceo of Telco D. R. And Tito G swooped in and took over the booth all 6000 square meters of it. The plan turn the booth into cloud city, the epicenter of public cloud innovation at MWC crews have been working around the clock. Over 100 and 50 people have been on this construction site for over three weeks with covid testing every day to prevent outbreaks during the build and in 100 days, it's become just that Cloud city has over 30 vendors presenting over 70 demos with 24 private meeting areas. Cloud City Live is a virtual showcase and live broadcast studio featuring 50 guests from cloud Thought leaders around the world. They have telepresence robots for a more personalized experience and the Cloud city quest game with a chance to win more than $100,000 to gain access to live streams of our nightly concerts with rosario flores and rock legend Jon bon Jovi. And don't forget to visit cloud city dot telco D R dot com to join in on the fun Daniel Royston and Nacho Gomez, founder and Ceo of one of the key vendors in the construction of the booth gave us a behind the scenes tour of the booth. >>Nacho. We did it. Yeah, we did. It can't even touch because of Covid. Yeah, but look what we did. But right, 100 days ago I called and I said I'm taking over the Ericsson booth. What did you think? I know you were crazy but just a little bit crazy, realized that you were mortgages than I thought. So at the very, at the very beginning I thought, yeah, she's crazy. But then I couldn't sleep that night. But the next uh then I realized that it was a very good it's a great idea. Yeah super smart. So yeah we're gonna show everyone toward the booth. Yeah let's go. Let's go. Okay So how do we build such an amazing, beautiful building now? So this is we've made building inside a book. So it was very hard to find a glassful of facade. The roof is around 24 tones. Yeah so it's crazy crazy but we made it work and it's totally amazing. Yeah. Do you want to go to tragedy life? Do let's go. Okay so here we are Cloud city live. I know we're producing a whole live streaming tv show. We always knew because of covid that not everyone will be able to come to Mwc as we wanted to make sure that people can learn about the public cloud. So over here we have the keynote stage, we're gonna have awesome speakers talking all throughout M. W. C. People from AWS Microsoft, google vendors companies. So really really great content. And then over there we have the cube interviewing people again 15 minute segments, live streaming but also available on demand. And you can find all of this content on cloud city. Tell Cody are calm and it's available for anyone to you. Well, a lot of content. And what about the roberts? I never get them out. Come on. We remember 100 days ago we were locked down. So we came up with the idea of having robots for the people who cannot attend in person. I know right. We always knew that there was gonna be a big virtual component to MWC this year. So we bought 100 telepresence robots. It's a great way to have a more personal experience inside the boot. Just sign up for one on cloud city dot telco D r dot com and you can control it yourself. Right? So today we have Nikki with us, who's dialing in from the Philippines in Manila? Hello, Nicky. Hi there, how are you? I were great. Can you show us a twirl all gaining on us? Super cool. Yeah, it is. What an experience. So Nikki robots are not the only cool thing we have in cloud city. We also have super awesome concert. We have rosario flores on monday. Who's a latin grammy award winner. We have Jon bon Jovi, Jon bon Jovi on Tuesday, can't be changing telephone that a little bit of rock n roll and that's Tuesday. And on Wednesday we have DJ official, it's going to be a super party. Now if you play our cloud city quest on cloud city telco D R dot com you can participate in a live streaming concert and so I know a lot of people out there have been a lockdown. Haven't been able to be going to concerts. Things from austin texas, which is the live music capital of the world, How to have music. It would be so exciting is gonna be great. I'm getting hungry. Why don't we go to the restaurant? Let's go eat. Let's go. Yeah, Here is our awesome restaurant. I know it's called Cloud nine. Right? It's a place to come and sit down and relax now. Barcelona is known for its great food and I'm a foodie. So we had to have a restaurant. Should we go check out my secret bar? Let's go. Mhm. Yeah, here >>thanks to a R. And thank you Nacho if you're watching this at home, I'm so sorry you can't join us in person. However, let's not forget this is a hybrid event meaning we're bringing all the public cloud action right to you wherever in the world you might be. This includes the Pact cloud city live program. We've partnered with the cube Silicon angle Media's live streaming video studio to make sure that all of the keynotes, panel discussions, demos, case studies interviews and way more are available on demand so you can watch them whenever and wherever you want or you can live stream and enjoy all things cloud city as and when they happen. So for those of you not able to join us in, Barcelona, be sure to log in to cloud city live and catch all the action and don't miss the awesome concert Tuesday night with Jon bon Jovi available for free. If you participate in our cloud city quest game, I'll be here throughout MWc bringing you reports and updates. Stay >>tuned. Yeah. >>Mhm. Okay, we're back here on the cube on the floor at mobile world congress in cloud city telco DRS clouds. They were here with D. R. Of telco, D R. Danielle Rice and great to see you back, we're back. So the keynotes going on connected world, the big news here, I'll see the open shift that's happening is going open. Open ran, it's been a big thing. Open ran alliance. You're starting to see the industry come together around this clear mandate that applications are gonna be cloud native and the public cloud is just coming in like a big wave and people are gonna be driftwood or they'll be surfing the wave. Yeah, this is what's happening. >>Yeah, I think public cloud is an unstoppable megatrend. It's hit every other industry regulated industries like banking, right? Top secret industries like government. They all use the public cloud tells us the last, you know, standing old school industry and it's coming and I don't think we could have had an MWc without talking about open man. That's the other major shift. And so we're bringing both of those ideas here together in cloud city. So >>the big theme is telco transformation. Maybe we could start with the basics like paint a picture of what the telco infrastructure looks like, particularly the data center stuff because they all have big data centers >>because that's >>those are the candidates to go into the cloud explained to the audience. >>Well, do you have a time machine? I think if any of us were in tech in the late 90s and early 2000s, that's what telcos like today. Right. So for people outside of the industry don't know right there mostly still managing their own data centers, they're just sort of adopting virtualization. Some of the more advanced telcos are mostly virtualized public cloud. Is this idea that like this advanced thought and so yeah, I mean things are on premise, things are in silom, things don't use a P. I. S there all integrated with custom code. And so the transformation, we can all see it because we've lived it in other industries. And I'm bringing that to telco and say come along for the ride. It totally works and it's gonna be amazing. >>So it's hardened purpose built infrastructure. Okay. That ultimately parts of that need to go to the public cloud. Right. What parts do you see going first? >>I think all of it. Really. Yeah. And I think when you look at like dish in the W. S. Which was an announcement that came out about two months ago. Right. I mean dish was doing all these are FPs. Everyone knew about it. They were looking for a cloud native software and no one knew what they were. They knew a big part was open man. But their coupling open ran with AWS and deploying their parts of their network onto the public cloud and the whole industry is like wait we thought this was years away, right? Or number two, you're crazy. And I'm saying this is what I've been talking about guys. This is exactly what you can do, leverage the Capex over. Let's see. I think Amazon did $100 billion 2020 right, leverage that Capex for yourself. Get that infinite scalability right? It's going to, well we >>have, we have a saying here in the queue, we just made this up called D. R. That's your initial tucker. The digital revolution and the three Rs reset re platform and re factor. I think the observation we're seeing is that you're coming in with the narrative what everyone's kind of like they're waking up because they have to reset and then re platform with the cloud. But the opportunity is gonna be the re factoring, You're seeing the public cloud, do that already with the Enterprise Enterprises. Already re factoring has done that. Already done that now. Telcos the last area to be innovated by the cloud. >>Yeah, I think there's old school big, we're kind of on a hollowed ground here in the Ericsson booth that I took over, right? They bailed and I kind of made fun of them. I was like, they don't have anything to say, right, They're not going to go to the show. I'm like, this is this is a revolution that's happening in telco and I don't think the big guys are really interested in rewriting their software that frankly makes them billions and billions of dollars of revenue. And I'm like to use the public cloud. All of the software needs to be rewritten needs to be re factored and you've got to start training your teams on how to use it. They don't have any capability. The telcos, in terms of those skills hire the right people, retrain your teams, move your applications, rewrite them. And I think that's what we're talking, this is not a short journey, this is a 10 year journey. So >>let's fast forward to the future a little bit because when I look around cloud city, I see ecosystem everywhere. So as you well know, the telcos have generally done a poor job of attacking adjacent seas. So my question is can they go beyond should they go beyond connectivity or is that going to be the role of the ecosystem? >>Yeah, I think it's time that the telco starts to focus on their subscriber, right? It's been really easy for them to rely on the oligopoly of the network, Right? The network, we live in the United States, we see the 18 T Verizon T mobile five G network, five G network. Like what about us? Right. And it's really easy for the over the top players right, that come in and they're always, telcos are always complaining about being coming dumb pipes and I'm like, you don't focus on the customer, we would rather buy from an Apple and amazon if they provided a mobile service because the customer experience will be better. Right? They need to start focusing on us. They have great businesses but they want to make them better. They need to start focusing on the subscriber, so >>it's a partnership with the ecosystem then for them to go beyond just straight connectivity because you're right, those are the brands that we want to do business >>with. You know, there was a great survey, Peter Atherton who will be talking as a speaker I think um I can't remember when he's talking but he was talking about how there was a survey done, where would you rather get your mobile service from? And it had a couple of big names in telco and then of course the obvious, you know, consumer brands, the ones that we all know and it was like overwhelmingly would rather buy from an amazon or an apple. And I'm like, this is like if you guys don't change, right, if telco doesn't change they keep rolling out 60 and blah blah blah. It's about the network and I don't start making about the subscriber right? Those revenues are going to continue to erode and they just sit there and complain about the O. T. T. Players. Like it's time to fight back. Yeah, I own the subscriber >>relationship. It's a digital revolution and I think This event really encapsulates in my mind this hybrid world here because it's physical events back. It's been since 2019 winter that this event actually happened. >>Well no it was even longer than, well I guess winter it was February of 19, right? And so like you look at ericsson and some of the big names that dropped out of the show, the time they come back, three years will have passed three years, right? This is how you feel your sales funnel is how you connect with your customers right? Tokyo is a very global, you know experience and so you gotta, you gotta get in front of people and you got to talk a >>lot of change to its happened, look at just what public clouds done in 2.5 years. You imagine three years being just >>gone, right? And I think a lot of people back to edition A. W. S. I think the industry was a little bit surprised by that announcement. So I've been telling executives if you were surprised by that, if you think that's, you know, if you don't know how that's gonna work, you need to come to cloud cities, you start meeting all the vendors are here. We have over 30 vendors, 70 demos, right? People who are pushing the technology forward, you need to learn what's going on here. We have several dish vendors here. Come learn about open rand, come learn about public cloud. So >>we're tight on time today, but we're going to have you back and we want to get into the tech, Get it to open, ran a little bit, get into what 5G and beyond and how we're going to take advantage of that and monetize it and what that all means. >>And also we want to hear what's going on the hallways. I know you got a lot of your key noting, you're gonna be a lot of events, the yacht. You've got a lot of briefings, >>yep. Yeah, I've already had two meetings this morning. I shot a video. Um, I met with one of the world's largest groups and I met with a tiny little super app company. Right? So running the gamut, doing everything reporter >>now, we could be like our roaming >>reporter. You know, I love, I love talking to execs and telco getting their perspective on what is public cloud and where are they going, what are they thinking about? And you talked to people who really, really get it and you get people who are just nascent and everywhere in between and I love mwc it's going great. >>Daniel Rose and you are a digital revolution telco DDR. There's amazing. Davis has been fantastic. Again for the folks watching, this is a hybrid events, there's an online component and we're reaching out with our remote interviews to get people brought in and we're shipping this content out to the masses all over the world. It's gonna be really amazing cube coverages here. It's gonna be rocking you guys are doing great. I just want to give you a compliment that you guys just did an amazing job. And of course we've got adam in the studio with the team. So adam, I'm gonna pass it off back to you in the studio

Published Date : Jun 28 2021

SUMMARY :

We're here at the cube here in cloud city telco It's awesome to see you guys. And we got in contact with you guys and we We got the cube here in the set and we got the studio with all the command and control And I'm like, nope, you guys got to start focusing on your subscribers, The roving reporter is going to give it a detail on how it all came together. for a more personalized experience and the Cloud city quest game with a chance to win So we came up with the idea of having robots for the thanks to a R. And thank you Nacho if you're watching this at home, I'm so sorry you can't join Yeah. D R. Danielle Rice and great to see you back, we're back. and it's coming and I don't think we could have had an MWc without talking about open man. Maybe we could start with the basics like paint a picture of what And I'm bringing that to telco and say come along for parts of that need to go to the public cloud. And I think when you look at like dish in the W. S. But the opportunity is gonna be the re factoring, You're seeing the public cloud, do that already with the Enterprise Enterprises. All of the software needs to be rewritten So as you well know, the telcos have generally done a poor job of And it's really easy for the over the top players And I'm like, this is like if you guys don't change, right, if telco doesn't change they keep rolling It's a digital revolution and I think This event really encapsulates in my mind this lot of change to its happened, look at just what public clouds done in 2.5 years. And I think a lot of people back to edition A. W. S. I think the industry was a little bit surprised we're tight on time today, but we're going to have you back and we want to get into the tech, Get it to open, I know you got a lot of your key noting, you're gonna be a lot of events, So running the gamut, doing everything reporter And you talked to people who really, So adam, I'm gonna pass it off back to you in the studio

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

KatiePERSON

0.99+

Jon bon JoviPERSON

0.99+

Peter AthertonPERSON

0.99+

Daniel RoystonPERSON

0.99+

amazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Danielle RoystonPERSON

0.99+

Daniel RosePERSON

0.99+

WednesdayDATE

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

Nacho GomezPERSON

0.99+

appleORGANIZATION

0.99+

70 demosQUANTITY

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

50 guestsQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

NachoPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey Day VolontePERSON

0.99+

adamPERSON

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

D. R.PERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

NickyPERSON

0.99+

PhilippinesLOCATION

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

TuesdayDATE

0.99+

24 private meeting areasQUANTITY

0.99+

TelcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

Tuesday nightDATE

0.99+

Silicon angle MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

more than $100,000QUANTITY

0.99+

D R. Danielle RicePERSON

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

DavisPERSON

0.99+

$100 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

2.5 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

early 2000sDATE

0.99+

ManilaLOCATION

0.99+

100 days agoDATE

0.99+

Tito GPERSON

0.99+

100 daysQUANTITY

0.99+

EricssonORGANIZATION

0.99+

over three weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

googleORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

late 90sDATE

0.98+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.98+

CeoPERSON

0.98+

two meetingsQUANTITY

0.98+

6000 square metersQUANTITY

0.98+

Daniel Royston CeoPERSON

0.98+

over 70 demosQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

50 peopleQUANTITY

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

M. W. C.LOCATION

0.98+

MWCEVENT

0.98+

February of 19DATE

0.98+

over 30 vendorsQUANTITY

0.98+

mondayDATE

0.97+

over 100 daysQUANTITY

0.97+

101 days agoDATE

0.97+

NikkiPERSON

0.97+

100 telepresence robotsQUANTITY

0.96+

60QUANTITY

0.96+

Cloud city quest gameTITLE

0.96+

bigEVENT

0.96+

TokyoLOCATION

0.95+

Mike Bilodeau, Kong Inc. | AWS Startup Showcase: Innovation with CloudData & CloudOps


 

>>Well, good day and welcome back to the cube as we continue our segment featuring AWS star showcase we're with now Mike Bilodeau, who's in corporate development and operations at Kong. Mike, uh, thank you for joining us here on the cube and particularly on the startup showcase. Nice to have you and pong represented here today. Thanks for having me, John. Great to be here. You bet. All right, first off, let's just tell us about pong a little bit and, and, uh, con cadet, which I know is your, your feature program, um, or, um, service. Oh, I love the name by the way. Um, but tell us a little bit about home and then what connect is all about to? Sure. So, uh, Kong as a company really came about in the past five years, our two co-founders came over from Italy in, uh, in the late, in the late aughts, early 20 teens and, uh, had a company called Mashape. >>And so what they were looking at and what they were betting on at that time was that API APIs, uh, were going to be the future of how software was built and how developers interacted with software. And so what came from that was a piece of, uh, they were running that shape as a marketplace at the time. So connecting developers sit in for an API so they can consume them and use them to build new software. And what they found was that actually the most valuable piece of technology that they created was the backbone for running that marketplace. And that backbone is what Kong is. And so they created it to be able to handle a massive amount of traffic, a massive amount of API APIs, all simultaneously. This is a problem that a lot of enterprises have, especially now that we've started to get some microservices, uh, started to, to have more distributed technologies. >>And so what Kong is really is it's a way to manage all of those different API APIs, all of the connections between different microservices, uh, through a single platform, which is called connect. And now that we've started to have Coobernetti's, uh, the, sort of the birth and the, the nascent space of service mesh con connect allows all of those connections to be managed and to be secured and made reliable, uh, through a single platform. So what's driving this right. I mean, um, you, you mentioned micro services, um, and Coobernetti's, and that environment, which is kind of facilitating, you know, this, uh, I guess transformation you might say. Um, but what's the big driver in your opinion, in terms of, of what's pushing this microservices phenomenon, if you will, or this revolution. Sure. And when I think it starts out at, at the simple active of technology acceleration in general, um, so when you look at just the, the real shifts that have come in enterprise, uh, especially looking, you know, start with that at the cloud, but you could even go back to VMware and virtualization is it's really about allowing people to build software more rapidly. >>Um, all of these different innovations that have happened, you know, with cloud, with virtualization now with containers, Kubernetes, microservices, they're really focused on making it, uh, so that developers can build software a lot more quickly, uh, develop the, the latest and greatest in a more rapid way. >>A huge driver out of this is just making it easier for developers, for organizations to bring new technologies to market. Uh, and we see that as a kind of a key driver in a lot of these decisions that are being made. I think another piece of it that's really coming about is looking at, uh, security, uh, as a really big component, you know, do you have a huge monolithic app? Uh, it can become very challenging to actually secure that if somebody gets into kind of that initial, uh, into the, the initial ops space, they're really past the point of no return and can get access to some things that you might not want them to similar for compliance and governance reasons that becomes challenging. So I think you're seeing this combination of where people are looking at breaking things into smaller pieces, even though it does come with its own challenges around security, um, that you need to manage, it's making it so that, uh, there's less ability to just get in and cause a lot of damage kind of all at once. Often Melissa malicious attackers. >>Yeah. You bring up security. And so, yeah, to me, it's almost, in some cases it's almost counterintuitive. I think about, I've got the, if I got this model, the gap and I've got a big parameter around it, right. And I know that I can confine this thing. I can contain this. This is good. Now microservices, now I got a lot of, it's almost like a lot of villages, right. They're all around. And, and uh, I don't have the castle anymore. I've got all these villages, so I have to build walls around all these villages. Right. But you're saying that there that's actually easier to do, or at least you're more capable of doing that now as opposed to living >>Three years ago. Well, you can almost think of it, uh, as if you have this little just right, and you might, um, if you have one castle and somebody gets inside, they're going to be able to find whatever treasury may have, you know, to extend the analogy here a bit, but now it's different, uh, 50 different villages that, you know, uh, an attacker needs to look in, it starts to become really time-consuming and really difficult. And now when you're looking at, especially this idea of kind of cybersecurity, um, the ability to secure a monolithic app is typically not all that different from what you can do with a microservice or with a once you get past that initial point, instead of thinking of it, you know, I have my one wall around everything, you know, think of it almost as a series of walls where it gets more and more difficult. Again, this all depends on, uh, that you're, you're managing that security well, which can get really time-consuming more than anything else and challenging from a pure management standpoint, but from an actual security posture, it is a way of where you can strengthen it, uh, because you're, you're creating more, um, more difficult ways of accessing information for attackers, as well as just more layers potentially of security. >>But what do you do to lift that burden then from, from the customer? Because like you said, that that that's a concern they really don't want to have. Right. They want, they want you to do that. They want somebody to do that for them. So what can, what do you do to alleviate those kinds of stress >>On their systems? Yeah, it's a great question. And this is really where the idea of API management and, um, in it's in its infancy came from, was thinking about, uh, how do we extract a way these different tasks that people don't really want to do when they're managing, uh, how API, how people can interact with their API APIs, whether that be a device or another human, um, and part of that is just taking away. So what we do and what API gate management tools have always done is abstract that into a, a new piece of software. So instead of having to kind of individually develop and write code for security, for logging, for, you know, routing logic, all these different pieces of how those different APIs will communicate with each other, we're putting that into a single piece of software and we're allowing that to be done in a really easy way. >>And so what we've done now with con connect and where we've extended that to you, is making it even easier to do that at a microservices level of scale. So if you're thinking about hundreds or thousands of different microservices that you understand and be able to manage, that's what we're really building to allow people to do. And so that comes with, you know, being able to, to make it extremely easy, uh, to, to actually add policies like authentication, you know, rate-limiting, whatever it may be, as well as giving people the choice to use what they want to use. Uh, we have great partners, you know, looking at the Datadog's, the Okta's of the world who provide a pretty, pretty incredible product. We don't necessarily want to reinvent the wheel on some of these things that are already out there, and that are widely loved and accepted by, uh, technology, practitioners and developers. We just want to make it really easy to actually use those, uh, those different technologies. And so that's, that's a lot of what we're doing is providing a, a way to make it easy to add this, you know, these policies and this logic into each one of these different services. >>So w if you're providing these kinds of services, right. And, and, and, and they're, they're, they're new, right. Um, and you're merging them sometimes with kind of legacy, uh, components, um, that transition or that interaction I would assume, could be a little complex. And, and you've, you've got your work cut out for you in some regards to kind of retrofit in some respects to make this seamless, to make this smooth. So maybe shine a little light on that process in terms of not throwing all the, you know, the bath out, you know, with, with the baby, all the water here, but just making sure it all works right. And that it makes it simple and, and, um, takes away that kind of complexity that people might be facing. >>Yeah, that's really the name of the game. Uh, we, we do not believe that there is a one size fits all approach in general, to how people should build software. Uh, there are going to need instances aware of building a monolithic app. It makes the most sense. There are going to be instances where building on Kubernetes makes the most sense. Um, the key thing that we want to solve is making sure that it works and that you're able to, to make the best technical decision for your products and for your organization. And so in looking at, uh, sort of how we help to solve that problem, I think the first is that we have first class support for everything. So we support, you know, everything down to, to kind of the oldest bare metal servers to NAMS, to containers across the board. Uh, and, and we had that mindset with every product that we brought to market. >>So thinking about our service mesh offering, for instance, um, Kula is the open source project that under tens now are even, but looking at Kumo, one of the first things that we did when we brought it out, because we saw this gap in space was to make sure that that adds first-class support for and chance at the time that wasn't something that was commonly done at all. Uh, now, you know, there there's more people are moving in that direction because they do see it as a need, which is great for the space. Um, but that's something where we, we understand that the important thing is making sure your point, you said it kind of the exact way that we like to, which is it needs to be reliable. It needs work. So I have a huge estate of, you know, older applications, older, uh, you know, potentially environments, even. I might have data centers that might've cloud being, trying to do everything all at once. Isn't really a pragmatic approach. Always. It needs to be able to support the journey as you move to, to a more modern way of building. So in terms of going from on-premise to the cloud, running in a hybrid approach, whatever it may be, all of those things shouldn't be an all or nothing proposition. It should be a phase approach and moving to, to really where it makes sense for your business and for the specific problem >>Talking about cloud deployments, obviously AWS comes into play there in a major way for you guys. Um, tell me a little bit about that, about how you're leveraging that relationship and how you're partnering with them, and then bringing the, the value then to your customer base and kind of how long that's been going on and the kinds of work that you guys are doing together, uh, ultimately to provide this kind of, uh, exemplary product or at least options to your customers. >>Yeah, of course. I think the way that we're doing it first and foremost is that, um, we, we know exactly who AWS is and the space and, and, you know, a great number of our customers are running on AWS. So again, I think that first class support in general for AWS environments services, uh, both from the container service, their, their Kubernetes services, everything that they can have and that they offer to their customers, we want to be able to support, uh, one of the first areas of really that comes to mind in terms of first-class integration and support is thinking about Lambda and serverless. Um, so at the time when we first came out, was that, again, it was early for us, uh, or early in our journey as product and as company, uh, but really early for the space. And so how we were able to support that and how we were able to see, uh, that it could support our vision and, and what we wanted to bring as a value proposition to the market has been, you know, really powerful. So I think in looking at, you know, how we work with AWS, certainly on a partnership level of where we share a lot of the same customers, we share a very similar ethos and wanting to help people do things in the most cost-effective rapid manner possible, and to build the best software. Uh, and, you know, I mean, for us, we have a little bit of a backstory with AWS because Jeffrey's us was a, an early investor in, in common. >>Yeah, exactly. I mean, the, the whole memo that he wrote about, uh, you know, build an API or you're fired was, was certainly an inspiration to, to us and it catalyzed, uh, so much change in, in the technology landscape in general, about how everyone viewed API APIs about building a software that could be reused and, and was composable. And so that's something that, you know, we, we look at, uh, kind of carrying forward and we've been building on that momentum ever since. So, >>Well, I mean, it's just kind of take a, again, a high level, look at this in terms of microservices. And now that it's changing in terms of cloud connectivity. Thank you. Actually, I have a graphic to that. Maybe we can pull up and take a look at this and let's talk about this evolution. You know, what's occurring here a little bit, and, and as we take a look at this, um, tell us what you think those, these impacts are at the end of the day for your customers and how they're better able to provide their services and satisfy their customer needs. >>Absolutely. So this is really the heart of the connect platform and of our vision in general. Um, we'd spoken just a minute ago about thinking how we can support the entire journey or, uh, the, the enterprise reality that is managing a, a relatively complex environment of modelists different services, microservices, you know, circle assumptions, whatever it may be, uh, as well as lots of different deployment methods and underlying tech platforms. You know, if you have, uh, virtual machines and Kubernetes, whatever, again, whatever it may be. But what we look at is just the different sort of, uh, design patterns that can occur in thinking about a monolithic application. And, um, okay. Mainly that's an edge concern of thinking about how you're going to handle connectivity coming in from the edge and looking at a Kubernetes environment of where you're going to have, you know, many Kubernetes clusters that need to be able to communicate with each other. >>That's where we start to think about, uh, our ingress products and Kubernetes ingress that allows for that cross applic, uh, across application communication. And then within the application itself, and looking at service mesh, which we talked a little bit about of just how do I make sure that I can instrument and secure every transaction that's happening in a, a truly microservices, uh, deployment within Kubernetes or outside of it? How do I make sure that that's reliable and secure? And so what we look at is this is just a, uh, part of it is evolution. And part of it is going to be figuring out what works best when it, um, certainly if you're, if you're building something from scratch, it doesn't always make sense to build it, your MDP, as, you know, microservices running on Kubernetes. It probably makes sense to go with the shortest path, uh, at the same time, if you're trying to run it at massive scale and big applications and make sure they're as reliable as possible, it very well does make sense to spend the time and the effort to, to make humanize work well for you. >>And I think that's, that's the, the beauty of, of how the space is shifting is that, uh, it's, it's going towards a way of the most practical solution to get towards business value, to, to move software quicker, to give customers the value that they want to delight them to use. Amazon's, uh, you know, phrase ology, if that's, uh, if that's a word, uh, it's, it's something of where, you know, that is becoming more and more standard practice versus just trying to make sure that you're doing the, the latest and greatest for the sake of, of, uh, of doing it. >>So we've been talking about customers in, in rather generic terms in terms of what you're providing them. We talked about new surfaces that are certainly, uh, providing added value and providing them solutions to their problems. Can you give us maybe just a couple of examples of some real life success stories, where, where you've had some success in terms of, of providing services that, um, I assume, um, people needed, or at least maybe they didn't know they needed until, uh, you, you provided that kind of development that, but give us an idea of maybe just, uh, shine, a little light on some success that you've had so that people at home watching this can perhaps relate to that experience and maybe give them a reason to think a little more about calm. >>Yeah, absolutely. Uh, there, there's a number that come to mind, but certainly one of the customers that I spent a lot of time with, uh, you know, become almost friends would be with, uh, with the different, with a couple of the practitioners who work there is company called Cargill. Uh, it's a shared one with us and AWS, you know, it's one we've written about in the past, but this is one of the largest companies in the world. Um, and, uh, the, the way that they describe it is, is that if you've ever eaten a Vic muffin or eaten from McDonald's and had breakfast there, you you've used a Cargill service because they provide so much of the, the food supply chain business and the logistics for it. They had a, uh, it's a, it's an old, you know, it's a century and a half old company. >>It has a really story kind of legacy, and it's grown to be an extremely large company that's so private. Uh, but you know, they have some of the most unique challenges. I think that I've, I've seen in the space in terms of needing to be able to ensure, uh, that they're able to, to kind of move quickly and build a lot of new services and software that touch so many different spaces. So they were, uh, the challenge that was put in front of them was looking at really modernizing, you know, again, a century and a half old company modernizing their entire tech stack. And, you know, we're certainly not all of that in any way, shape or form, but we are something that can help that process quite a bit. And so, as they were migrating to AWS, as they were looking at, you know, creating a CICB process for, for really being able to ship and deploy new software as quickly as possible as they were looking at how they could distribute the, the new API APIs and services that they were building, we were helping them with every piece of that journey, um, by being able to, to make sure that the services that they deployed, uh, performed in the way that they expected them to, we're able to give them a lot of competence and being able to move, uh, more rapidly and move a lot of software over from these tried and true, uh, you know, older or more legacy of doing things to a much more cloud native built as they were looking at using Kubernetes in AWS and, and being able to support that handle scale. >>Again, we are something that was able to, to kind of bridge that gap and make sure that there weren't going to be disruptions. So there, there are a lot of kind of great reasons of why they're their numbers really speak for themselves in terms of how, uh, how much velocity they were able to get. You know, they saying them saying them out loud on the sense fake in some cases, um, because they were able to, you know, I think like something, something around the order of 20 X, the amount of new API APIs and services that they were building over a six month period, really kind of crazy crazy numbers. Um, but it is something where, you know, the, for us, we, we got a lot out of them because they were open source users. So calling is first and foremost, an open source company. >>And so they were helping us before they even became paying customers, uh, just by testing the software and providing feedback, really putting it through its paces and using it at a scale that's really hard to replicate, you know, the scale of a, uh, a couple of hundred thousand person company, right? Yeah. Talking about a win-win yeah. That worked out well. It's certainly the proof is in the pudding and I'm sure that's just one of many examples of success that you've had. Uh, we appreciate the time here and certainly the insights and wish you well on down the road. Thanks for joining us, Mike. Thanks, Sean. Thanks for having me. I've been speaking with Mike Villa from Kong. He is in corporate development and operations there on John Walls, and you're watching on the cube, the AWS startup showcase.

Published Date : Mar 24 2021

SUMMARY :

Mike, uh, thank you for joining us here on the cube and particularly on the startup showcase. And so they created it to be able to handle a massive amount of traffic, which is kind of facilitating, you know, this, uh, I guess transformation you might say. Um, all of these different innovations that have happened, you know, with cloud, as a really big component, you know, do you have a huge monolithic app? that there that's actually easier to do, or at least you're more capable of they're going to be able to find whatever treasury may have, you know, to extend the analogy here a bit, So what can, what do you do to alleviate those security, for logging, for, you know, routing logic, And so that comes with, you know, being able to, to make it extremely not throwing all the, you know, the bath out, you know, with, with the baby, So we support, you know, It needs to be able to support the journey as you move to, how long that's been going on and the kinds of work that you guys are doing together, uh, So I think in looking at, you know, how we work with AWS, And so that's something that, you know, we, we look at, um, tell us what you think those, these impacts are at the end of the day for your of modelists different services, microservices, you know, allows for that cross applic, uh, across application communication. Amazon's, uh, you know, phrase ology, Can you give us maybe just a couple of examples of some real life They had a, uh, it's a, it's an old, you know, it's a century and a half uh, you know, older or more legacy of doing things to a much more cloud native built as on the sense fake in some cases, um, because they were able to, you know, I think like something, you know, the scale of a, uh, a couple of hundred thousand person company,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
SeanPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Mike BilodeauPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

ItalyLOCATION

0.99+

MikePERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

CargillORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Mike VillaPERSON

0.99+

MashapeORGANIZATION

0.99+

John WallsPERSON

0.99+

OktaORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

Three years agoDATE

0.98+

two co-foundersQUANTITY

0.98+

a century and a halfQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

50 different villagesQUANTITY

0.97+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.97+

hundredsQUANTITY

0.97+

one castleQUANTITY

0.97+

20 XQUANTITY

0.96+

KongORGANIZATION

0.96+

single platformQUANTITY

0.96+

KongLOCATION

0.96+

todayDATE

0.95+

first areasQUANTITY

0.95+

DatadogORGANIZATION

0.95+

single pieceQUANTITY

0.95+

first classQUANTITY

0.94+

single platformQUANTITY

0.94+

one wallQUANTITY

0.93+

LambdaTITLE

0.93+

first-classQUANTITY

0.93+

Kong Inc.ORGANIZATION

0.92+

a century and a half oldQUANTITY

0.91+

KumoORGANIZATION

0.9+

a minute agoDATE

0.89+

KubernetesTITLE

0.88+

first thingsQUANTITY

0.88+

each oneQUANTITY

0.85+

KubernetesORGANIZATION

0.83+

VicORGANIZATION

0.83+

over a six monthQUANTITY

0.82+

McDonald'sORGANIZATION

0.8+

CoobernettiORGANIZATION

0.8+

under tensQUANTITY

0.79+

ingressORGANIZATION

0.78+

hundred thousand personQUANTITY

0.77+

one sizeQUANTITY

0.75+

past five yearsDATE

0.74+

20 teensDATE

0.64+

MelissaORGANIZATION

0.52+

KulaORGANIZATION

0.52+

CloudDataTITLE

0.5+

customersQUANTITY

0.48+

CloudOpsTITLE

0.47+

NAMSORGANIZATION

0.47+

Startup ShowcaseEVENT

0.45+

Rob Groat, Smartronix & Anthony Vultaggio, Smartronix | AWS re:Invent 2020


 

>>from >>around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 sponsored by Intel AWS and our community partners. >>Hey, welcome back. You're ready, Jeffrey here with the Cube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios with our continuing coverage of aws reinvent 2020 the virtual event. We're excited to be back. We've been coming to reinvent for years and years and years, I think since 2013 1st years virtual But that's the way it is. And we're gonna jump into Cloud and government and D o d. And we're really excited to have our next guest. You know a lot about the topic. We have Robert Grote. He is the VP of technology and strategy from spark Tronics coming to us from Virginia. Great to see you, Robert. >>Great. Thank you. >>And joining him is Anthony Voltaggio, the CTO of Smartronix. Anthony. Good to see you as well. Thank you. Great. So let's jump into it. I think Rob, we had you on a couple of years ago. I I looked it up. It was early October 18 and you guys were getting a lot of success with cloud in government and I think it was before the Jedi and all that other stuff was going down. Two years is forever in cloud time. I wonder if you could just share a little bit about how the market has changed since I think it was February or March of 2018 to now late November 2020 in terms of cloud and government and Department of Defense. And you're highly regulated customers. >>Sure, I think one of the things that's changed is that security certainly used to be a headwind on bond. Now we're actually seeing it more of a tailwind where our customers, especially are heavily regulated, compliance driven customers in the public sector and the D. O. D are really looking at new ways of embracing the value of the cloud. So one of the things that has changed is that maybe two years ago, we were looking at How do we move digital estate from on premise into the cloud environment? We're now we're looking at. How do we actually achieve value in the cloud? How do we allow our customers to optimize their portfolio? How do they modernize their application footprint in a in a secure way and some of the things that we focused on, particularly smartronix, is how do we remove that friction that exists when a new kind of legacy customer really wants to transform the way that they deliver services. So we built, uh, capabilities that really allow them to more rapidly migrate their services into the cloud environment. We created and have an 80 0, now for a cloud assured manage services, which means that our customers who want to meet the rigorous security mandates now have that ability to utilize our services when they're deploying these services. And it really enables them to focus on the development of the modernization, you know, versus having to do the cumbersome components of security compliance and operation on def. You if you look at what we're trying to build and trying Thio intersect with where our customers we're going, they really want to get to that pace of innovation that the cloud provides. Um, you know, I think I've said this before to the Cube that the slope of disruption is correlated to the pace of innovation. And if you continue to build technical debt like our customers may have done in the past, they're gonna fall behind and it might be okay, um, for, you know, Blockbuster to fall behind the Netflix or for uber disrupted industry. But for our customers, there's national security consequences when they fall behind. So we've got to create a platform and a capability that enables them to innovate on, deliver very agile services rapidly. >>And then I wanna go. I wanna go to you because I think Robin, in your last interview, talked about your customers very secure, highly regulated, compliance driven environments. Right? And? And to be clear, you guys sell a lot to Department of Defense and all the various branches of the U. S. Military etcetera. You know, Anthony, a lot of talk of digital transformation on the commercial side and and people going right And then, of course, all the jokes and memes about Covic, you know, being the accelerator to that for >>your >>customers. The accelerators thio at modernization in the digital transformation are very different. It's not about necessarily the competitors down the street, but it's about some nasty competitors that want to cause this real harm. How how have they adopted? You know, kind of this this digital transformation and what's different in terms of accelerating it in your customer base. >>We're looking our defense customers and national security customers. Absolutely. The velocity and scale of cloud is becoming an enabler again. Looking at those information work was that they have looking at the nation state adversaries that we're facing right now. Information is information warfare. So if we're not ready to scale, innovate at much higher velocity than we have in the past, we're gonna become victim to those attacks. Methodologies that score matters of using so that the scale and power of the cloud as well is that tailwind of all these authorized services that are offered by Amazon that are already at the federal federal high and D o D. Impact. Those for higher, up to impact level six really, really enable them to go ahead and meet that mission. But mad and speed and agility. They need toe mash that for necessary, >>right? Well lets you just talked about impact level, and I want to dig into that for a little bit because in doing research on you guys and a lot of the solutions that customers you talk about, there's there's constant conversation about these impact levels Impact level for impact level five Impact Level six Again. It's highly regulated industry. You guys have a very, very high bar that you have to hit in your solutions. What does impact level mean and why is it important? And how are you basically working your way up the chart, which I assume is a much more impactful? Not not no pun intended, but much more significant solution delivery. >>So impact levels really have to do with information risk. So what is the level of information that that system is processing? So as you move up the impact levels, that information becomes more more critical to national security. So on impact Level four system may have to do with standard mission operations and Ministry of Task, etcetera, where when you go up the staff to impeccable five and even to impact level six or higher, you're really dealing with, let's say, in the d. O d, uh, perspective, the horror fighter eso. Now you're dealing with where that war fighters deployed the capabilities of the water fighter that they're leveraging To fight that battle against the adversary eso you have to put more and more rigorous controls around that information to ensure the adversaries can gain the tactical advantage over our war fighters. >>It's really interesting. You know how all these systems are really designed? Uh, toe work together. And as you said, kind of for that, that warfighter, if you you know, you you watch anything on defense, it's kind of the point into the stick, but there's a whole lot of support behind that behind that person at the very end to help them get the information to be successful in their job and support them. Um, etcetera. But I'm curious. Have you seen a change in attitude in terms of not only the data and the information in the systems as a support for the war fighter, but in fact, that data itself being a significant asset as well as a significant target, probably bigger and more valuable than an aircraft carrier or any other kind of traditional defense assets? >>Yeah, I would say we've definitely seen that change. Our our our customers air really looking at data and aggregate and when you're when you're building a cloud profile when you're building a portfolio systems, um, and it's all in a single type environment or an enclave where you can unlock the value of that data, the aggregate of all of those applications. The aggregate of that data has increased value, and that allows you to do a lot more things with it. Allows you to innovate a lot. Mawr toe. Learn more about that data on We're seeing our customers really looking at. How can they unlock that value? Whether it's looking at improving the supply chain, looking at data feeds that they're able to aggregate from commercial sources as well as sources that they're getting in a distributed fashion or whether it's just, you know, looking at, how can they improve the efficiency of of delivering services to the to the warfighter? Um, it really is about unlocking that value of data. So that's why it's also important that we have capabilities that protect that data. And then we provide more capabilities that allow our customers to be able to leverage as the C. S. P s as AWS innovates. Allow them to leverage these new capabilities much more rapidly than they could in the past, >>right? Well, and you talk about technical debt and you know there's kind of technical dead and There's application dead, and there's kind of application portfolio stuff that that you have right that may or may not work well, that's probably running and has been running for years. That doesn't necessarily all have to be modernized. You said Sometimes you know it's it's best to leave. Leave it as it lies. How are you helping people figure out? You know what, what to modernize, what to leave it as as it is. And then you know, or you know how much effort should really be spent on new on new applications and new development. You know, taking taking advantage of the latest because that's kind of a tricky portfolio strategy. And as you said, there's a whole lot of legacy stuff that's still running in those old data centers. >>You mentioned the key word there and that strategy. Our our customers are looking to us to help them evaluate their portfolio, determine what things that they should be doing next, the sequencing events and how they can unlock some of those values in the cloud. So, you know, one of the things that we talk about is that ability to even if you're taking stuff from a legacy environment and moving that estate into the cloud. There's certain things that you can do to opportunistically re factor and get value out of the cloud. You don't have to rewrite the application every time there's things that you can do to just re factor. Um, and one of those components is that when you look at cloud and you look at the a p I nature of the cloud, um, transparency is the gift of the cloud. And automation is how you get value out of that gift. And when when you look at how automation and transparency you're kind of tied together for our customers and you look at the fact that again everything's in a P I based, you know, with, you know, full non repudiation who made that call when they made that call? You've got an ability to create this autonomic response system, and this is This is a key part of application modernization, giving that customer the ability to rapidly respond to an event, create automation, create run books, use you know, advanced technologies like machine learning for anomaly detection, create, you know, security orchestration, all of those components when you could build that framework. Then your customers can even take some of their legacy assets and be able to utilize, you know, the high value of the cloud and respond to events much faster and in, um, or automated an autonomic manner. >>I love that transparency in automation. And I want to go back to you. Anthony, you've been doing this for a long time. Um, you didn't have these tools at your disposal before, and you didn't have necessarily the automation that you have before. And I think more importantly, you know, interesting thing that Rob you touched on on on your earlier interview a couple of years back, you know, kind of this scale learning something identified by by Bill Chamorro's I once in terms of calling it out where you learn something in one place and you can apply that learning, you know, across many, many places. And then the other piece. I want you to comment on its automation because, as we know, a lot of errors happen from silly things, fat fingers, bad copy paste, putting in a wrong config code. This that and the other. So, by adding mawr and Mawr automation and continuing to kind of remove potential little slip ups that can cause big big problems. It's a really different world that you've got in the tools that you have in your portfolio to offer these solutions up to your clients >>absolutely again, as we've learned MAWR Maura about these repeatable patterns that have happened across our different customers. That allows us to create that run book automation library that then allows our team and our capabilities scale across multiple workloads and kind of like Robert identified earlier. There's a lot of these cognitive services, and I'll take Amazon a specific example. Guard duty. It is a very innovative capability with M. L. A. I behind it that allow you to look at these access patterns and communication patterns of these application workloads and quickly identify threats. But the automation and road book and orchestration that you can build behind this then allows you to leverage that library to immediately respond to these events. When you see a threat and you see that pattern, your your ability to rapidly respond to that and mitigate that threat, Israel allows your business and information systems continue providing no the primary business use case and again in our GOP customer. National security system. Customers dividing to the warfighter complete their mission. >>Yeah, well, what a good and let you give. Give a plug for some of your processes and techniques. You have something that you call fast, um, to help people, you know, go through this decision process. And I think, as you said, Rob, you know, you gotta have some strategy before you start making some decisions. And also, this thing that we're seeing out there called the shift left. Um, what does that mean to you? What does it mean to your customers? Why is that important? Why should people know about it? Start with you, Rob. >>So what? We notice we've been doing cloud services, you know, since 2009, Really? One of the first eight of us public sector partners delivering the first capabilities to that market. And what we noticed is that ah, lot of organizations found it easy to move one or two workloads into the cloud. But they struggled in making a cloud, a true enterprise asset. So we took a step back and we created something that we call foundational agile strategic transformation. And that's fast. It's a It's a program that we developed that allows complex organizations. Security minded organizations understand What are all the foundational things that need to be in place to really treat cloud as an enterprise asset? And it covers much more than just the technical components. It covers the organizational components. It covers all the stakeholders around security. But one of the key things that we've changed in the past couple of years is how do we not only look at, you know, leveraging the cloud is an enterprise asset, But how do we allow them to accelerate how they can get the value out of the cloud, modernize their applications, create thes capabilities? And the shift left component of fast is providing as much capability all the way down to where the developer is, where you have maybe dead set cops when it used to be a developer on one side and operations on the other. Security is kind of a binding function. Now we're talking about how can we create more capability, right at the point of development? How can we shift that capability? And I think the role of the managed service provider is to enable that in an organization provide capability, provide operations capability but also help them in a You know, we use the term SRE quite a bit. Site reliability, engineering. How can we really help them continuously optimize their portfolio and build a set of capabilities and services? So when they're building new applications, they're not adding to their technical debt. >>That's great and so and so, so important. And it's just been so interesting. Toe watch again. A security specifically for Public Cloud in AWS has become from you know, what was potentially a concern and a headwind to now being a tailwind. And all you have to do is go to go to some of the the architectural keynotes my some of my favorites and see the scale in massive investments that they can put into infrastructure. And they can put into security that no single company, unless you have the biggest, biggest ones you know, can possibly invested to be able to leverage that opportunity. And obviously, Teresa Carlson and the Public Sector team have done a really good job and giving you guys the solutions that satisfy the very tight requirements that you're very important customers have. So it's really a great story and really enjoy learning mawr and continued success to you guys And, uh, and your teams and your importance, your customers and all the important stuff that they protect for us. Uh, eso thank you very much. All right. Thank you. All right, well, signing off. That's Robert and Anthony. I'm Jeff. You're watching the Cube. Ongoing coverage of aws reinvent 2020. Thanks for watching. See you next time. Thank you.

Published Date : Dec 10 2020

SUMMARY :

It's the Cube with digital coverage of AWS You're ready, Jeffrey here with the Cube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios with our continuing coverage Thank you. Good to see you as well. the development of the modernization, you know, versus having to do the cumbersome components of security you know, being the accelerator to that for It's not about necessarily the competitors down the street, but it's about some nasty competitors to scale, innovate at much higher velocity than we have in the past, we're gonna become victim to those attacks. You guys have a very, very high bar that you have to hit in your solutions. battle against the adversary eso you have to put more and more rigorous controls around that information And as you said, kind of for that, that warfighter, if you you know, and that allows you to do a lot more things with it. And then you know, or you know how much effort should really be spent on new on new applications and new development. You don't have to rewrite the application every time there's things that you can do to just re factor. and you didn't have necessarily the automation that you have before. A. I behind it that allow you to look at these access patterns and communication You have something that you call fast, um, to help people, you know, go through this decision process. all the way down to where the developer is, where you have maybe dead set cops when it used to be a developer Teresa Carlson and the Public Sector team have done a really good job and giving you guys the solutions that

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AnthonyPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

Robert GrotePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

RobertPERSON

0.99+

Anthony VoltaggioPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

RobPERSON

0.99+

FebruaryDATE

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

Anthony VultaggioPERSON

0.99+

VirginiaLOCATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bill ChamorroPERSON

0.99+

Rob GroatPERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

Department of DefenseORGANIZATION

0.99+

SmartronixORGANIZATION

0.99+

RobinPERSON

0.99+

2009DATE

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

late November 2020DATE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

early October 18DATE

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

U. S. MilitaryORGANIZATION

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

Two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

March of 2018DATE

0.98+

two years agoDATE

0.98+

uberORGANIZATION

0.96+

first capabilitiesQUANTITY

0.95+

couple of years agoDATE

0.95+

level sixQUANTITY

0.95+

smartronixORGANIZATION

0.94+

D.ORGANIZATION

0.94+

1st yearsQUANTITY

0.93+

Intel AWSORGANIZATION

0.93+

one placeQUANTITY

0.92+

CubeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.91+

Ministry of TaskORGANIZATION

0.9+

CovicPERSON

0.89+

single typeQUANTITY

0.89+

80 0OTHER

0.88+

yearsQUANTITY

0.86+

IsraelORGANIZATION

0.86+

O. DLOCATION

0.84+

couple of years backDATE

0.83+

level fiveQUANTITY

0.82+

single companyQUANTITY

0.82+

M. L. A. IPERSON

0.78+

reinvent 2020EVENT

0.76+

first eightQUANTITY

0.76+

one sideQUANTITY

0.74+

ThioORGANIZATION

0.7+

past couple of yearsDATE

0.69+

mawrORGANIZATION

0.64+

GOPORGANIZATION

0.63+

impactOTHER

0.63+

C. S. PORGANIZATION

0.63+

aws reinvent 2020TITLE

0.62+

Level sixQUANTITY

0.62+

Level fourOTHER

0.61+

sparkORGANIZATION

0.57+

impactQUANTITY

0.56+

2020TITLE

0.53+

JediPERSON

0.52+

MawrORGANIZATION

0.51+

aws reinvent 2020EVENT

0.47+

MAWR MauraPERSON

0.42+

InventEVENT

0.4+

CubeTITLE

0.39+

Andrew Rafla & Ravi Dhaval, Deloitte & Touche LLP | AWS re:Invent 2020


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 sponsored by Intel, AWS and our community partners. >>Hey, welcome back already, Jeffrey here with the Cube coming to you from Palo Alto studios today for our ongoing coverage of aws reinvent 2020. It's a digital event like everything else in 2020. We're excited for our next segment, so let's jump into it. We're joined in our next segment by Andrew Rafa. He is the principal and zero trust offering lead at the Light and Touche LLP. Andrew, great to see you. >>Thanks for having me. >>Absolutely. And joining him is Robbie Deval. He is the AWS cyber risk lead for Deloitte and Touche LLP. Robbie, Good to see you as well. >>Hey, Jeff, good to see you as well. >>Absolutely. So let's jump into it. You guys are all about zero trust and I know a little bit about zero trust I've been going to are safe for a number of years and I think one of the people that you like to quote analysts chase Cunningham from Forrester, who's been doing a lot of work around zero trust. But for folks that aren't really familiar with it. Andrew, why don't you give us kind of the 101? About zero trust. What is it? What's it all about? And why is it important? >>Sure thing. So is your trust is, um, it's a conceptual framework that helps organizations deal with kind of the ubiquitous nature of modern enterprise environments. Um, and then its course. Your trust commits to a risk based approach to enforcing the concept of least privileged across five key pillars those being users, workloads, data networks and devices. And the reason we're seeing is your trust really come to the forefront is because modern enterprise environments have shifted dramatically right. There is no longer a defined, clearly defined perimeter where everything on the outside is inherently considered, considered untrusted, and everything on the inside could be considered inherently trusted. There's a couple what I call macro level drivers that are, you know, changing the need for organizations to think about securing their enterprises in a more modern way. Um, the first macro level driver is really the evolving business models. So as organizations are pushing to the cloud, um, maybe expanding into into what they were considered high risk geography is dealing with M and A transactions and and further relying on 3rd and 4th parties to maintain some of their critical business operations. Um, the data and the assets by which the organization, um transact are no longer within the walls of the data center. Right? So, again, the perimeter is very much dissolved. The second, you know, macro level driver is really the shifting and evolving workforce. Um, especially given the pandemic and the need for organizations to support almost an entirely remote workforce nowadays, um, organizations, they're trying to think about how they revamp their traditional VPN technologies in order to provide connectivity to their employees into other third parties that need to get access to, uh, the enterprise. So how do we do so in a secure, scalable and reliable way and then the last kind of macro level driver is really the complexity of the I t landscape. So, you know, in legacy environment organizations on Lee had to support managed devices, and today you're seeing the proliferation of unmanaged devices, whether it be you know, B y o d devices, um, Internet of things, devices or other smart connected devices. So organizations are now, you know, have the need to provide connectivity to some of these other types of devices. But how do you do so in a way that, you know limits the risk of the expanding threat surface that you might be exposing your organization to by supporting from these connected devices? So those are some three kind of macro level drivers that are really, you know, constituting the need to think about security in a different >>way. Right? Well, I love I downloaded. You guys have, ah zero trust point of view document that that I downloaded. And I like the way that you you put real specificity around those five pillars again users, workloads, data networks and devices. And as you said, you have to take this kind of approach that it's kind of on a need to know basis. The less, you know, at kind of the minimum they need to know. But then, to do that across all of those five pillars, how hard is that to put in place? I mean, there's a There's a lot of pieces of this puzzle. Um, and I'm sure you know, we talk all the time about baking security and throughout the entire stack. How hard is it to go into a large enterprise and get them started or get them down the road on this zero trust journey? >>Yeah. So you mentioned the five pillars. And one thing that we do in our framework because we put data at the center of our framework and we do that on purpose because at the end of the day, you know, data is the center of all things. It's important for an organization to understand. You know what data it has, what the criticality of that data is, how that data should be classified and the governance around who and what should access it from a no users workloads, uh, networks and devices perspective. Um, I think one misconception is that if an organization wants to go down the path of zero trust, there's a misconception that they have to rip out and replace everything that they have today. Um, it's likely that most organizations are already doing something that fundamentally aligned to the concept of these privilege as it relates to zero trust. So it's important to kind of step back, you know, set a vision and strategy as faras What it is you're trying to protect, why you're trying to protect it. And what capability do you have in place today and take more of an incremental and iterative approach towards adoption, starting with some of your kind of lower risk use cases or lower risk parts of your environment and then implementing lessons learned along the way along the journey? Um, before enforcing, you know more of those robust controls around your critical assets or your crown jewels, if you >>will. Right? So, Robbie, I want to follow up with you, you know? And you just talked about a lot of the kind of macro trends that are driving this and clearly covert and work from anywhere is a big one. But one of the ones that you didn't mention that's coming right around the pike is five g and I o t. Right, so five g and and I o. T. We're going to see, you know, the scale and the volume and the mass of machine generated data, which is really what five g is all about, grow again exponentially. We've seen enough curves up into the right on the data growth, but we've barely scratched the surface and what's coming on? Five G and I o t. How does that work into your plans? And how should people be thinking about security around this kind of new paradigm? >>Yeah, I think that's a great question, Jeff. And as you said, you know, I UT continues to accelerate, especially with the recent investments and five G that you know pushing, pushing more and more industries and companies to adopt a coyote. Deloitte has been and, you know, helping our customers leverage a combination of these technologies cloud, Iot, TML and AI to solve their problems in the industry. For instance, uh, we've been helping restaurants automate their operations. Uh, we've helped automate some of the food safety audit processes they have, especially given the code situation that's been helping them a lot. We are currently working with companies to connect smart, wearable devices that that send the patient vital information back to the cloud. And once it's in the cloud, it goes through further processing upstream through applications and data. Let's etcetera. The way we've been implementing these solutions is largely leveraging a lot of the native services that AWS provides, like device manager that helps you onboard hundreds of devices and group them into different categories. Uh, we leveraged device Defender. That's a monitoring service for making sure that the devices are adhering to a particular security baseline. We also have implemented AWS green grass on the edge, where the device actually resides. Eso that it acts as a central gateway and a secure gateway so that all the devices are able to connect to this gateway and then ultimately connect to the cloud. One common problem we run into is ah, lot of the legacy i o t devices. They tend to communicate using insecure protocols and in clear text eso we actually had to leverage AWS lambda Function on the edge to convert these legacy protocols. Think of very secure and Q t t protocol that ultimately, you know, sense data encrypted to the cloud eso the key thing to recognize. And then the transformational shift here is, um, Cloud has the ability today to impact security off the device and the edge from the cloud using cloud native services, and that continues to grow. And that's one of the key reasons we're seeing accelerated growth and adoption of Iot devices on did you brought up a point about five G and and that's really interesting. And a recent set of investments that eight of us, for example, has been making. And they launched their AWS Waveland zones that allows you to deploy compute and storage infrastructure at the five G edge. So millions of devices they can connect securely to the computer infrastructure without ever having to leave the five g network Our go over the Internet insecurely talking to the cloud infrastructure. Uh, that allows us to actually enable our customers to process large volumes of data in a short, near real time. And also it increases the security of the architectures. Andi, I think truly, uh, this this five g combination with I o t and cloudy, I m l the are the technologies of the future that are collectively pushing us towards a a future where we're gonna Seymour smart cities that come into play driverless connected cars, etcetera. >>That's great. Now I wanna impact that a little bit more because we are here in aws re invent and I was just looking up. We had Glenn Goran 2015, introducing a W S s I O T Cloud. And it was a funny little demo. They had a little greenhouse, and you could turn on the water and open up the windows. But it's but it's a huge suite of services that you guys have at your disposal. Leveraging aws. I wonder, I guess, Andrew, if you could speak a little bit more suite of tools that you can now bring to bear when you're helping your customers go to the zero trust journey. >>Yeah, sure thing. So, um, obviously there's a significant partnership in place, and, uh, we work together, uh, pretty tremendously in the market, one of the service are one of solution offering that we've built out which we dub Delight Fortress, um is a is a concept that plays very nicely into our zero trust framework. More along the kind of horizontal components of our framework, which is really the fabric that ties it all together. Um s o the two horizontal than our framework around telemetry and analytics. A swell the automation orchestration. If I peel back the automation orchestration capability just a little bit, um, we we built this avoid fortress capability in order for organizations to kind of streamline um, some of the vulnerability management aspect of the enterprise. And so we're able through integration through AWS, Lambda and other functions, um, quickly identify cloud configuration issues and drift eso that, um, organizations cannot only, uh, quickly identify some of those issues that open up risk to the enterprise, but also in real time. Um, take some action to close down those vulnerabilities and ultimately re mediate them. Right? So it's way for, um, to have, um or kind of proactive approach to security rather than a reactive approach. Everyone knows that cloud configuration issues are likely the number one kind of threat factor for Attackers. And so we're able to not only help organizations identify those, but then closed them down in real time. >>Yeah, it's interesting because we hear that all the time. If there's a breach and if if they w s involved often it's a it's a configuration. You know, somebody left the door open basically, and and it really drives something you were talking about. Ravi is the increasing important of automation, um, and and using big data. And you talked about this kind of horizontal tele metrics and analytics because without automation, these systems are just getting too big and and crazy for people Thio manage by themselves. But more importantly, it's kind of a signal to noise issue when you just have so much traffic, right? You really need help surfacing. That signals you said so that your pro actively going after the things that matter and not being just drowned in the things that don't matter. Ravi, you're shaking your head up and down. I think you probably agree with this point. >>Yeah, yeah, Jeff and definitely agree with you. And what you're saying is truly automation is a way off dealing with problems at scale. When when you have hundreds of accounts and that spans across, you know, multiple cloud service providers, it truly becomes a challenge to establish a particular security baseline and continue to adhere to it. And you wanna have some automation capabilities in place to be able to react, you know, and respond to it in real time versus it goes down to a ticketing system and some person is having to do you know, some triaging and then somebody else is bringing in this, you know, solution that they implement. And eventually, by the time you're systems could be compromised. So ah, good way of doing this and is leveraging automation and orchestration is just a capability that enhances your operational efficiency by streamlining summed Emmanuel in repetitive tasks, there's numerous examples off what automation and orchestration could do, but from a security context. Some of the key examples are automated security operations, automated identity provisioning, automated incident response, etcetera. One particular use case that Deloitte identified and built a solution around is the identification and also the automated remediation of Cloud security. Miss Consideration. This is a common occurrence and use case we see across all our customers. So the way in the context of a double as the way we did this is we built a event driven architectures that's leveraging eight of us contribute config service that monitors the baselines of these different services. Azzan. When it detects address from the baseline, it fires often alert. That's picked up by the Cloudwatch event service that's ultimately feeding it upstream into our workflow that leverages event bridge service. From there, the workflow goes into our policy engine, which is a database that has a collection off hundreds of rules that we put together uh, compliance activities. It also matched maps back to, ah, large set of controls frameworks so that this is applicable to any industry and customer, and then, based on the violation that has occurred, are based on the mis configuration and the service. The appropriate lambda function is deployed and that Lambda is actually, uh, performing the corrective actions or the remediation actions while, you know, it might seem like a lot. But all this is happening in near real time because it is leveraging native services. And some of the key benefits that our customers see is truly the ease of implementation because it's all native services on either worse and then it can scale and, uh, cover any additional eight of those accounts as the organization continues to scale on. One key benefit is we also provide a dashboard that provides visibility into one of the top violations that are occurring in your ecosystem. How many times a particular lambda function was set off to go correct that situation. Ultimately, that that kind of view is informing. Thea Outfront processes off developing secure infrastructure as code and then also, you know, correcting the security guard rails that that might have drifted over time. Eso That's how we've been helping our customers and this particular solution that we developed. It's called the Lloyd Fortress, and it provides coverage across all the major cloud service providers. >>Yeah, that's a great summary. And I'm sure you have huge demand for that because he's mis configuration things. We hear about him all the time and I want to give you the last word for we sign off. You know, it's easy to sit on the side of the desk and say, Yeah, we got a big security and everything and you got to be thinking about security from from the time you're in, in development all the way through, obviously deployment and production and all the minutes I wonder if you could share. You know, you're on that side of the glass and you're out there doing this every day. Just a couple of you know, kind of high level thoughts about how people need to make sure they're thinking about security not only in 2020 but but really looking down the like another road. >>Yeah, yeah, sure thing. So, you know, first and foremost, it's important to align. Uh, any transformation initiative, including your trust to business objectives. Right? Don't Don't let this come off as another I t. Security project, right? Make sure that, um, you're aligning to business priorities, whether it be, you know, pushing to the cloud, uh, for scalability and efficiency, whether it's digital transformation initiative, whether it be a new consumer identity, Uh uh, an authorization, um, capability of china built. Make sure that you're aligning to those business objectives and baking in and aligning to those guiding principles of zero trust from the start. Right, Because that will ultimately help drive consensus across the various stakeholder groups within the organization. Uh, and build trust, if you will, in the zero trust journey. Um, one other thing I would say is focus on the fundamentals. Very often, organizations struggle with some. You know what we call general cyber hygiene capabilities. That being, you know, I t asset management and data classifications, data governance. Um, to really fully appreciate the benefits of zero trust. It's important to kind of get some of those table six, right? Right. So you have to understand, you know what assets you have, what the criticality of those assets are? What business processes air driven by those assets. Um, what your data criticality is how it should be classified intact throughout the ecosystem so that you could really enforce, you know, tag based policy, uh, decisions within, within the control stack. Right. And then finally, in order to really push the needle on automation orchestration, make sure that you're using technology that integrate with each other, right? So taken a p I driven approach so that you have the ability to integrate some of these heterogeneous, um, security controls and drive some level of automation and orchestration in order to enhance your your efficiency along the journey. Right. So those were just some kind of lessons learned about some of the things that we would, uh, you know, tell our clients to keep in mind as they go down the adoption journey. >>That's a great That's a great summary s So we're gonna have to leave it there. But Andrew Robbie, thank you very much for sharing your insight and and again, you know, supporting this This move to zero trust because that's really the way it's got to be as we continue to go forward. So thanks again and enjoy the rest of your reinvent. >>Yeah, absolutely. Thanks for your time. >>All right. He's Andrew. He's Robbie. I'm Jeff. You're watching the Cube from AWS reinvent 2020. Thanks for watching. See you next time.

Published Date : Dec 8 2020

SUMMARY :

It's the Cube with digital coverage He is the principal and zero trust offering lead at the Light Robbie, Good to see you as well. Andrew, why don't you give us kind of the 101? So organizations are now, you know, have the need to provide connectivity And I like the way that you you put real specificity around those five pillars to kind of step back, you know, set a vision and strategy as faras What it is you're trying to protect, Right, so five g and and I o. T. We're going to see, you know, the scale and the volume so that all the devices are able to connect to this gateway and then ultimately connect to the cloud. that you can now bring to bear when you're helping your customers go to the zero trust journey. Everyone knows that cloud configuration issues are likely the number But more importantly, it's kind of a signal to noise issue when you just have so much traffic, some person is having to do you know, some triaging and then somebody else is bringing in this, You know, it's easy to sit on the side of the desk and say, Yeah, we got a big security and everything and you got to be thinking so that you have the ability to integrate some of these heterogeneous, um, thank you very much for sharing your insight and and again, you know, supporting this This move to Thanks for your time. See you next time.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

AndrewPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Robbie DevalPERSON

0.99+

Andrew RafaPERSON

0.99+

RobbiePERSON

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

Andrew RaflaPERSON

0.99+

Andrew RobbiePERSON

0.99+

DeloitteORGANIZATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

RaviPERSON

0.99+

five key pillarsQUANTITY

0.99+

3rdQUANTITY

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

chase CunninghamPERSON

0.98+

five pillarsQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

Ravi DhavalPERSON

0.98+

Lloyd FortressORGANIZATION

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

one thingQUANTITY

0.98+

eightQUANTITY

0.98+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.98+

EmmanuelPERSON

0.98+

One key benefitQUANTITY

0.97+

twoQUANTITY

0.97+

zero trustQUANTITY

0.97+

threeQUANTITY

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.97+

2015DATE

0.97+

awsORGANIZATION

0.96+

IotTITLE

0.96+

one misconceptionQUANTITY

0.96+

4th partiesQUANTITY

0.96+

pandemicEVENT

0.95+

Light and Touche LLPORGANIZATION

0.95+

Glenn GoranPERSON

0.95+

Deloitte & Touche LLPORGANIZATION

0.95+

hundreds of devicesQUANTITY

0.94+

hundreds of accountsQUANTITY

0.94+

table sixQUANTITY

0.94+

millions of devicesQUANTITY

0.94+

Deloitte and Touche LLPORGANIZATION

0.91+

CubeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.91+

CloudwatchTITLE

0.9+

LambdaTITLE

0.9+

hundreds of rulesQUANTITY

0.9+

101QUANTITY

0.9+

chinaLOCATION

0.89+

Delight FortressTITLE

0.88+

firstQUANTITY

0.86+

doubleQUANTITY

0.85+

zeroQUANTITY

0.83+

One particular use caseQUANTITY

0.78+

SeymourORGANIZATION

0.77+

EsoORGANIZATION

0.77+

five GTITLE

0.77+

Miguel Perez Colino & Rich Sharples, Red Hat | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2020


 

>>From around the globe. It's the cube with coverage of coop con and cloud native con North America, 2020 virtual brought to you by red hat, the cloud native computing foundation and ecosystem partners. >>Hey, welcome back, everybody Jeffrey here with the cube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today with our ongoing coverage of coupon cloud native con North America, 2020. It's not really North America, it's virtual like everything else, but you know that the European show earlier in the summer, and this is the, this is the late fall show. So we're excited to welcome in our very next two guests. Uh, first joining us from Madrid. Spain is Miguel Perez, Kaleena. He is a principal product manager from red hat, Miguel. Great to see you. >>Good to see you happy to be in the cube. >>Yes. Great. Well welcome. And joining us from North Carolina is rich Sharples. He is a senior director, product management of red hat. Rich. Great to see you. >>Yeah, likewise, thanks for inviting me again. >>So we're talking about Java today and before we kind of jump into it, you know, in preparing for this rich, I saw an interview that you did, I think earlier about halfway through the year, uh, celebrating the 25th anniversary of Java and talking about the 25th anniversary Java. And before we kind of get into the future, I think it's worthwhile to take a look back at, you know, kind of where Java came from and how it's lasted for 25 years of such an important enterprise, you know, kind of application framework, because we always hear jokes about people looking for COBOL programmers or, you know, all these old language programmers, because they have some old system that's that needs a little assist. What's special about Java. Why are we 25 years into it? And you guys are still excited about Java yesterday, today and in the future. >>Yeah. And I should add that, um, in terms of languages, uh, twenty-five is actually still pretty young. Java's, uh, kind of middle aged, I guess. Um, you know, things like CC plus bus rrr you're 45, 50 years old Python, I think is about the same as Java in terms of years. So, you know, the languages do tend to move at a, um, at a, they do tend to stick around, uh, uh, a bit, well what's made Java really, really important for enterprises building business critical applications is it started off with a very large ecosystem of big vendors supporting it. Um, it was open in a sense from the very start and it's remained open as in open source and an open community as well. So that's really, really helped, um, you know, keep the language innovating and moving along and attracting new developers. And, um, it's, it's still a fairly modern language in terms of some of the new features it's advancing with the industry taking on new kinds of workloads and new kinds of per program paradigms as well. So, you know, it's, it's evolved very well and has a huge base out somewhere between 11 and 13 million developers still use it as a primary development language in professional settings. Yeah. >>What struck me about what you said though in that interview was kind of the evolution and how Java has been able to continue to adapt based on kind of what the new frameworks are. So whether it was early days in a machine, like you talked about being in a set top box, or, you know, kind of really lightweight kind of almost IOT applications then to be calming, you know, this really a great application to deliver enterprise applications via a web browser and that, you know, and it continues to morph and change and adapt over time. I thought that was pretty interesting given the vast change in the way applications are delivered today versus what they were 25 years ago. >>Yeah, absolutely. It's, you know, the very early days were around embedded devices, uh, intelligent toasters and, you know, whatever. Um, and, and then where it really, really took off was, but the building supporting big backend systems, big transactional workloads, whether you're a bank or an airline you're running both the scale, but also running really, really complex transactional systems that were business critical. And that's that's for the last, you know, 15 years has been, um, where it's, it's really shown building backend, um, systems. Now, as we kind of move forward, you know, the idea of, uh, um, like server side, uh, server side application versus a front end is kind of changed. You know, now we're talking microservices, we're talking about running in containers. So really the focus of where we run Java and the kinds of applications we're building with Java as this has radically changed. And as such the language has to change as well, which is, you know, one, I'm pretty excited to talk about caucus today. >>So let's, let's jump into it and talk about corcus cause the other big trend, you know, along with, with, with obviously, uh, uh, browsers being great enterprise applications, delivery vehicles is this thing called containers, right? And, and specifically more recently Kubernetes is the one that's grabbing all the attention and grabbing all the, all the momentum. Um, so I wonder Miguel, if you could talk about, you know, kind of as, as the popularity of containerized applications and containerized to everything right, containerized storage, or you even talked about containerizing networking, troll, how that's impacted, uh, what you guys are doing and the impact of Java, uh, and making it work with kind of a containerized Kubernetes world. >>Well, what we found is that the paradigm of development has teeth. So we have this top up, uh, uh, paradigm that the people are following to be able to do the best with containers, to the best with Kubernetes on the, this has worked quite fine in Greenfield on for, for many cases has been a way to develop applications faster, to be able to obtain variably salts. And the thing is that for many, uh, users, for many companies that we work with, uh, they also want to bring some of their stuff that the applications that are currently are running into this world. And, uh, I mean, we, we walk especially a lot in helping these customers be able to adopt those obligations, but we try to do it, uh, as we say, the N pixie dust, you know, we really dig into the code, we'll review the code with modernize. The application will help their customer with that application. We provide the tools are open for anyone to be able to review it and to be able to take it. So we are moving away from Greenfield into brownfield and not a way we are evolving together to say we more precise, you know, all these Greenfield applications keep coming, but also the current applications want to be more organized. >>Right. Right. So it's pretty interesting. Cause that's always the big conversation. There's, it's, it's all fine. And good if you're just building something new, uh, to use the latest tools. But as you mentioned, there's a whole lot of conversation about application modernization and this is really an opportunity to apply some of these techniques to do that. So quirky. So I wonder if you just give, let's just jump into it. What is it at the highest level? Uh, what's it all about? What should people know? >>Yeah. So, so Corker says I'm reading an attempt by red hat to ensure Java is a first-class citizen in containerized environments, but building reactive applications, uh, cloud native applications, uh, functions, Java is an incredible piece of engineering. It does some incredible things. It sudden can self optimize. As it's running in line code, it can do some really amazing things the longer it runs, but in a containerized environment, you're likely not going to be running huge amounts of code. You'd likely be running microservices and your, your services are likely to have a kind of limited life cycle as we you're able to deploy more frequently or in a function environment where, you know, you've been bought once and then you're done, um, you know, during all those long, um, kind of, um, those optimizations over time, don't really, um, make a lot of sense. So what we can do is remove a lot of the, um, the weights of Java, a lot of the complexity of Java, and we can optimize for an environment where your code is maybe just running for a few microseconds as in the case of the function or something running in native, cause you scale up and scale down. >>So we move a lot of the op side. We move a lot of the, um, the, the efforts within the application, uh, to compile time, we pre compile all of your, of your config and initialization, so that doesn't have to happen in your, um, your, your, your runtime or your production environment. Um, and then we can optimize the code week. We can, we can remove that code. We can remove, you know, whole, uh, trees and class libraries and really slimmed down the memory footprint and radically, um, slim, the Maddie memory footprint, um, increase the startup time as well. So, you know, you have less downtime in your applications. Um, and we've recently done a S a study with ADC that shows some pretty stunning results compared to, you know, some existing frameworks. And, you know, we get, um, you know, sort of like, you know, overall cost savings of, you know, 60, 64%. >>Um, we can get eight times better density. You're running more in a, in a, in a cluster and, um, you know, reduction in memory up to 90% as well. So it's, these are significant changes now. That's all good, you know, saving, saving 60, 60% on your operational costs is significant. But what we find is that most organizations, they come for the performance and the optimizations, but what actually stay for is the speed of development. So I think, I think caucus real silver bullets is, um, the developer productivity, you know, for organizations, the cost of development is still one of the major costs. I mean, the operational costs, the hosting costs a significant, but development costs, time to market will always be top of mind for organizations that are trying to move faster than the competition. And I think that's really where, um, um, caucus special and coupled in, uh, in, uh, OpenShift or Coobernetti's environment really, really does shine. Yeah, >>It's pretty interesting. So people can go to corcus.io and see a lot of the statistics that you just referenced in terms of memory usage and speed and, and whole bunch of stuff. But what struck me when I went to the site was that was this big, uh, uh, two words that jumped out developer joy. And it's funny that you talked on that just now about really, um, the benefits that come to the developer directly to make them happier. I mean, really calling out their joy. So they're more productive and ultimately that's what you said. That's where the great value is in terms of speed of deployment, happy developers, and productive developers. You know, Miguel, you get your, you get down into the weeds of this stuff. Again, the presentations on your LinkedIn, everyone needs to go look and you talk a lot about at migration and you lot talk a lot about app modernization. So without going through all 120 some odd slides that I think you have, which is good, phenomenal information, what are some of the top things that people need to think about and consider both for app modernization as well as at migration? >>Um, that's, that's, that's an interesting question. Uh, the thing is that, um, the tolling is important on the current code is, and the thing is that normally when, when we started migration project, we tried to find architects in the applications to be able to find patterns. You know, you find parents is much easier because, uh, once you solve one part on the same part on can be solved in a very similar way. So this is one of the parts of that. We focus a lot, but before getting to that point, it's very important how you stop, you know, so the assessment phase is, is very important to be able to review well, what is the status of the applications, the context of the applications. And with that, I mean, things like, for example, the requirements that they have, there's the maintenance that they take in their resiliency and so on. >>So you have to prepare very well, the project by starting with a good assessment, you have to check which applications makes more, make more sense to start with and see which, how to group them together by similarities. And then you can start with the project that saying, okay, let's go for these set of applications that make more sense that are more likely to be containerized because of the way we are developing them because of the dependencies that they have because of the resiliency that is already embedded into them and so on. So that, that the methodology is important. And we normally, for example, when we, when we help partners do a application migration, one of the things that we stress is that this is the methodology that we follow and in the website for my vision, totally for application, you can find also, um, methodology, uh, part that, uh, could help, uh, people understand, okay, these, these are the stages that we normally follow to be successful with migrating applications. >>Yeah. Let go. You don't, we're not friends. We don't hang out a lot, but if we did, you would know I never ever recommend PowerPoint for anything. So, so the fact that I'm calling out your PowerPoint actually means something. Cause I think it's the worst application ever built, but you got some tremendous, tremendous information in there and people do need to go in and look, and again, it's all from your LinkedIn work, but I wanted to shift gears a little bit, right? We're at CubeCon cloud native con. Um, obviously it's virtual is 2020. That's the way the world today. But I just curious to get your guys' take on, on what does this, uh, event mean for you obviously really active, open source community, you know, red hat has a long open-source history. Um, what does CubeCon cloud native con mean for you guys? What do you hope to get out of it? What should people hope to, uh, to learn from red hat? >>Yeah, we, um, yeah, we're, we're buying your DNA. We're very, very collaborative. Uh, we, we love to learn from our customers, users of the technologies, um, in the communities that we support. Um, speaking as a, you know, we're both product guys, there's nothing better than getting with, um, people that actually use the products, um, in anger, in real life, whether they're products are upstream technologies, learning, learning, what they're doing, understanding where, um, some of the gaps are there's. Um, yeah, we just couldn't do our jobs without engaging with developers, users in these kind of conferences. Yeah. A lot of the, um, love interest we've seen with coworkers is, is in the community, you know, um, like I'd been part of many, many successful open source projects, um, um, over red hat. And it's great when your customers, you know, like, uh, Vodafone, Greece or Carrefour in Spain are openly publicly talking about how good your technology is, what they're using it for. And that's really good. So it's just nothing, there's no alternative that, you know, whether it be virtual virtually or physically sitting down with, uh, with users of your technology, >>How about you, Miguel? What are you hoping to get out of, uh, out of the show this year? >>Um, we are working a lot with, on Kubernetes in red hat, on, uh, as part of the community, of course. And, um, I mean, there are so many new stuff that is coming around, Kubernetes that, uh, it's mostly about it, about all the capabilities that were arming, especially for example, several lists, you know, several lessons, there is an important topic with crackers, because for example, as you make the application stopped so much faster and react so much faster, you could have known of them running and just waiting for an event to happen, which saves a lot of resources and makes us super efficient. So this is one of the topics, for example, that we wanted to cover in this edition, you know, how we are implementing serverless with Kubernetes and OpenShift and many other things like pipelines. Like, I don't know, we just had quite a visit in the, uh, uh, video, uh, life of what is coming up. I see for the six. And I recommend people to take a look at it, to get everything that's new because there's a lot. Yeah, >>Yeah. You guys are technical people. You've been doing this for a long time. Why is Kubernetes so special? W Y Y you know, there's been containers in the past, right. And we've seen other kind of branded open source projects that got a lot of momentum, but Kubernetes just seems to be blowing everybody out of the out of its path. Why, what should people know about Kubernetes that aren't necessarily developers? >>Yeah, there's really nothing interesting about a single container or a single microservice, right? That's not, that's not the kind of environment that, um, real organizations live in. They live in organizations where they're going to have hundreds of services, um, who just containers and you need a technology to orchestrate and manage that in that complex environment. And Kubernete's has just quickly become the, the district per standard. Um, yeah, folks are red hat jumped on my very, very early, um, I mean, one of the advantages around her have is where we're embedded with developers and open source communities. We often have a pretty good, it gives us a pretty good crystal ball. So we're often quick to jump on the emerging technologies that are coming out of open source. And that's exactly what happened with Cubanetis. It was clear. It was, um, you're going to be sophisticated for our, you know, most, um, most sophisticated customers running at scale. Um, but, but also, you know, great for development environments as well. So it really a good fit for, uh, where we were headed and, you know, just very, very quickly became the fact that standard. And you, you just gotta go with the de facto standard. Right, right. >>Right. Well, the another thing that you mentioned rich in that other interview that I was watching is it came up the conversation in terms of managing open source projects. And at some point, you know, they kind of start, and then, you know, I think this one, if I go to corcus and look at the bottom of the page sponsored by red hat, but you talked about, you know, at some point, do you move it over to a foundation, um, you know, and kind of what are the things that kind of drive that process, that decision, um, and, you know, I would imagine that part of it has to do with popularity and scale, is that something, you know, potentially down the road, how do you think that you said you've been in lots of open source projects, when does it move from, you know, kind of single point of origin to more of a foundational support? >>Yeah. I mean, in fact the foundation's owner was necessary. Um, you know, when you have a, yeah. If you, if you have a, an open, very open project with, um, um, clear, clear rules for collaboration and kind of the encouragement or others to collaborate and be able to, you know, um, move the project and, you know, the foundation as low as necessarily what we've seen, I've been part of the no GS world where, you know, the, the community reached Belden to keep no GS moving forward. Um, we had to go from a, what we call a benevolent dictator for life, somebody who's well-intentioned, but, um, yeah, we're on stone, the technology, so a foundation, which is much more inclusive and, um, you know, greater collaboration and you can move even quicker. So, you know, um, I think what's required is, is open governance for open source projects and where that doesn't happen. You know, maybe a foundation is, is the right way forward. Right, right now with, with caucus, um, you know, the, the non red hat developers seem pretty happy with the way they can get, uh, get engaged and contribute. Um, but if we get to a point where the community is demanding a foundation and we'll absolutely consider it, that's the best project we'll do. >>So, so we're, we're coming to the end of our time. I want to give you each the last word, really with two questions, one again, you know, just kind of a summary of, of, uh, of CubeCon cloud, native con, you know, what should people be looking for, uh, find you, and, and, and I don't know if you guys are sponsoring any sessions, I'm sure there's a lot of great content. If you want to highlight one or two things. And then most importantly, as we turn the calendars, we come to the end of 2020, uh, thankfully, um, as you look ahead to 2021, you know, what are some of your priorities, uh, as, as we get ready to turn the turn, the calendar, and Miguel let's start with you. >>So, um, I mean, we have been working very hard this year on the migration, took it for applications to help her every user that is using Java to bring the two containers. You know, whether it is data IE or these crackers, but we're putting like a lot of effort in crackers. And now we are bringing in new rules. And, uh, by the, by December, we expect to have the new version of the migration looking for applications that is going to include the, all the bulls to help developers bring their, their code to the Java code, to, to carcass. And, uh, on this, this is the main goal for us right now. We are moving forward to the next year to include more, more capabilities in that project. Everything's up on site. You can go to the conveyor, uh, project and ticket on, uh, on the up capabilities for the assessment phase. So whenever any partner, any, any of our consultants are working on, on migration or anyone that would like to go and try it themselves on adopted, would like to do these migrations to the cloud native world, uh, will feel comfortable with, with this tool. So that is our main goal in, in my, in my team. >>All right. And how about you rich? >>Yeah, I think we're going to see this, um, um, kind of syllabus solidification kind of web of, um, microservices. Um, you know, if you like hate that, I'm sorry, but I'm just going to next generation microservice. There's going to be, as Miguel mentioned, is gonna be based around, um, uh, native, um, advancing, um, serverless functions. I think that's really the, the, the ideal architecture, the building March services, um, on, on Coobernetti's and caucus plays really, really well there. Um, I think there's, there's a, there's a kind of backlog of projects, um, within organizations that, um, you know, hopefully next year, everything really does start to crank up. And I think, um, yeah, I think a lot of the migration that Miguel has talked about is going to be, is going to rise in terms of importance. So app modernization, taking those existing applications, maybe taking aspects of those and, you know, doing some kind of decomposition in some microservices using caucus and a native, I think we'll see a lot of that. So I think we'll see a real drive around both the kind of Greenfield, um, applications, uh, you know, this next generation of microservices, as well as pulling those existing applications forward into these new environments, don't give an answers. So it's going to be excellent. >>Awesome. Well, thank you both for taking a few minutes with us and sharing the story of corcus, uh, and have a great show. Great to see you and a really good the conversation. All right. He's Miguel, he's rich. I'm Jeff. You're watching the cubes ongoing coverage of CubeCon cloud native con 2020 North America. Virtual. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.

Published Date : Nov 20 2020

SUMMARY :

cloud native con North America, 2020 virtual brought to you by red hat, Hey, welcome back, everybody Jeffrey here with the cube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today with our ongoing coverage Great to see you. And before we kind of get into the future, I think it's worthwhile to take a look back at, you know, kind of where Java came So that's really, really helped, um, you know, keep the language innovating and moving IOT applications then to be calming, you know, this really a great application And that's that's for the last, you know, 15 years has been, So let's, let's jump into it and talk about corcus cause the other big trend, you know, along with, the N pixie dust, you know, we really dig into the code, So I wonder if you just give, as in the case of the function or something running in native, cause you scale up and scale down. um, you know, sort of like, you know, overall cost savings of, in a, in a cluster and, um, you know, reduction in memory up to 90% And it's funny that you talked on that just now about really, to that point, it's very important how you stop, you know, so the assessment phase is, So you have to prepare very well, the project by starting with a good assessment, open source community, you know, red hat has a long open-source history. So it's just nothing, there's no alternative that, you know, for example, that we wanted to cover in this edition, you know, how we are implementing serverless W Y Y you know, there's been containers in the past, right. So it really a good fit for, uh, where we were headed and, you know, just very, very quickly became the fact that And at some point, you know, kind of the encouragement or others to collaborate and be able to, you know, uh, thankfully, um, as you look ahead to 2021, you know, what are some of your priorities, So, um, I mean, we have been working very hard this year on the migration, And how about you rich? um, applications, uh, you know, this next generation of microservices, as well Great to see you and a really good the conversation.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Mark ShuttleworthPERSON

0.99+

John TroyerPERSON

0.99+

MadridLOCATION

0.99+

60QUANTITY

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

Dorich TelecomORGANIZATION

0.99+

CanonicalORGANIZATION

0.99+

VodafoneORGANIZATION

0.99+

$10QUANTITY

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

Miguel PerezPERSON

0.99+

SpainLOCATION

0.99+

10 serversQUANTITY

0.99+

two questionsQUANTITY

0.99+

CarrefourORGANIZATION

0.99+

45QUANTITY

0.99+

North CarolinaLOCATION

0.99+

MiguelPERSON

0.99+

AmericasLOCATION

0.99+

SoftBankORGANIZATION

0.99+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.99+

25 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

VancouverLOCATION

0.99+

AT&TORGANIZATION

0.99+

20%QUANTITY

0.99+

MarkPERSON

0.99+

100 serversQUANTITY

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

JavaTITLE

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

OpenStack FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

PowerPointTITLE

0.99+

StuPERSON

0.99+

one serverQUANTITY

0.99+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

North AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

64%QUANTITY

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

3%QUANTITY

0.99+

LinkedInORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

11QUANTITY

0.99+

CentOSTITLE

0.99+

Vancouver, CanadaLOCATION

0.99+

.3%QUANTITY

0.99+

two wordsQUANTITY

0.99+

120QUANTITY

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

KaleenaPERSON

0.99+

three years agoDATE

0.99+

PythonTITLE

0.99+

OpenStackORGANIZATION

0.99+

two problemsQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

DevOps Virtual Forum Panel 2020


 

>>From around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of dev ops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom. >>Hi guys. Welcome back. So we have discussed the current state and the near future state of DevOps and how it's going to evolve from three unique perspectives. In this last segment, we're going to open up the floor and see if we can come to a shared understanding of where dev ops needs to go in order to be successful next year. So our guests today are, you've seen them all before Jeffrey Hammond is here. The VP and principal analyst serving CIO is at Forester. We've also got Serge Lucio, the GM of Broadcom's enterprise software division and Glenn Martin, the head of QA transformation at BT guys. Welcome back. Great to have you all three together >>To be here. >>All right. So we're very, we're all very socially distanced as we've talked about before. Great to have this conversation. So let's, let's start with one of the topics that we kicked off the forum with Jeff. We're going to start with you spiritual co-location that's a really interesting topic that we've we've uncovered, but how much of the challenge is truly cultural and what can we solve through technology? Jeff, we'll start with you then search then Glen Jeff, take it away. >>Yeah, I think fundamentally you can have all the technology in the world and if you don't make the right investments in the cultural practices in your development organization, you still won't be effective. Um, almost 10 years ago, I wrote a piece, um, where I did a bunch of research around what made high performance teams, software delivery teams, high performance. And one of the things that came out as part of that was that these teams have a high level of autonomy. And that's one of the things that you see coming out of the agile manifesto. Let's take that to today where developers are on their own in their own offices. If you've got teams where the team itself had a high level of autonomy, um, and they know how to work, they can make decisions. They can move forward. They're not waiting for management to tell them what to do. >>And so what we have seen is that organizations that embraced autonomy, uh, and got their teams in the right place and their teams had the information that they needed to make the right decisions have actually been able to operate pretty well, even as they've been remote. And it's turned out to be things like, well, how do we actually push the software that we've created into production that would become the challenge is not, are we writing the right software? And that's why I think the term spiritual co-location is so important because even though we may be physically distant, we're on the same plane, we're connected from a, from, from a, a, a shared purpose. Um, you know, surgeon, I worked together a long, long time ago, surgery it's been what almost 15, 16 years since we were at the same place. And yet I would say there's probably still a certain level of spiritual co-location between us, uh, because of the shared purposes that we've had in the past and what we've seen, uh, in the industry. And that's a really powerful tool, uh, to build on. So what do tools play as part of that, to the extent that tools make information available, to build shared purpose on to the extent that they enable communication so that we can build that spiritual co-location to the extent that they reinforce the culture that we want to put in place, they can be incredibly valuable, especially when, when we don't have the luxury of physical locate, physical colocation. Hope. That makes sense. >>It does. I should have introduced us. This last segment is we're all spiritually co-located or it's a surge, clearly you're still spiritually co located with junk. Talk to me about what your thoughts are about spiritual of co-location the cultural impact and how technology can move it forward. >>Yeah. So I think, well, I'm going to sound very similar to Jeff in that respect. I think, you know, it starts with kind of a shared purpose and the other, I, Oh, individuals teams, uh, contributed to kind of a business outcome. What is our shared goal or shared vision? What's what is it we're trying to achieve collectively and, uh, keeping it aligned to that. Um, and so, so it's really starts with that now, now the big challenge, always these over the last 20 years, especially in large organizations, there's the specialization of roles and functions. And so we, we all that started to basically measure which we do, uh, on a daily basis using metrics, which oftentimes are completely disconnected from kind of a business outcome or purpose. We, we kind of revert back to, okay, what is my database all the time? What is my cycle time like? >>And, and I think, you know, which we can do or where we really should be focused as an industry is to start to basically provide a lens for these different stakeholders to look at what they're doing in the context of kind of these business outcomes. So, um, you know, probably one of my, um, theories of experience was to actually weakness at one of a large financial institution, um, you know, to stakeholders and quote development and operations staring at the same data, right. Which was related to, you know, in calming changes, um, testing, execution results, you know, covert coverage, um, official liabilities and all the all ran. It could have a direction leveling. So that's when you start to put these things in context and represent that in a way that these different stakeholders can, can look at from their different lens. And, uh, and it can start to basically communicate and understand of they jointly are competing to, uh, to, to that kind of common view or objective. >>And Glen, we talked a lot about transformation with you last time. What are your on spiritual co-location and the cultural part, the technology impact? >>Yeah, I mean, I agree with Jeffrey that, you know, um, the people and culture, the most important thing, actually, that's why it's really important when you're transforming to have partners who have the same vision as you, um, who, who you can work with, have the same end goal in mind. And I've certainly found that with our, um, you know, continuing relationship with Broadcom, what it also does though, is although, you know, tools can accelerate what you're doing and can join consistency. You know, we've seen within simplify, which is BTS flagship transformation program, where we're trying to, as it says, simplify the number of systems stacks that we have, the number of products that we have actually at the moment, we've got different value streams within that program who have got organizational silos who were trying to rewrite, rewrite the wheel, um, who are still doing things manually. >>So in order to try and bring that consistency, we need the right tools that actually are at an enterprise grade, which can be flexible to work with in BT, which is such a complex and very different environments. But in all areas, BT you're in whether it's a consumer, whether it's a mobile area, whether it's large global or government organizations, you know, we found that we need tools that can drive that consistency, but also flex to Greenfield brownfield kind of technologies as well. So it's really important that as I say, for a number of different aspects, that you have the right partner, um, to drive the right culture, I've got the same vision, but also who have the tool sets to help you accelerate. They can't do that on their own, but they can help accelerate what it is you're trying to do in it. And a really good example of that is we're trying to shift left, which is probably a, quite a bit of a buzz phrase in there kind of testing world at the moment. >>But, you know, I could talk about things like continuous delivery director, one of Broadcom's tools, and it has many different features to it, but very simply on its own, it allows us to give the visibility of what the teams are doing. And once we have that visibility, then we can talk to the teams, um, around, you know, could they be doing better component testing? Could they be using some virtualized services here or there? And that's not even the main purpose of continuous delivery director, but it's just a reason that tools themselves can just give greater visibility of have much more intuitive and insightful conversations with other teams and reduce those organizational silos. >>Thanks, Ben. So we'd kind of sum that up. Autonomy collaboration tools that facilitate that. So let's talk now about metrics from your perspectives. What are the metrics that matter, Jeff? >>Well, I'm going to go right back to what Glenn said about data that provides visibility that enables us to, to make decisions, um, with shared purpose. And so business value has to be one of the first things that we at. Um, how do we assess whether we have built something that is valuable, you know, that could be sales revenue, it could be net promoter score. Uh, if you're not selling what you've built, it could even be what the level of reuse is within your organization or other teams picking up the services, uh, that you've created. Um, one of the things that I've begun to see organizations do is to align value streams with customer journeys and then to align teams with those value streams. So that's one of the ways that you get to a shared purpose, cause we're all trying to deliver around that customer journey, the value associated with it. >>And we're all measured on that. Um, there are flow metrics which are really important. How long does it take us to get a new feature out from the time that we conceive it to the time that we can run our first experiments with it? There are quality metrics, um, you know, some of the classics or maybe things like defect, density, or meantime to response. Um, one of my favorites came from a, um, a company called ultimate software where they looked at the ratio of defects found in production to defects found in pre production and their developers were in fact measured on that ratio. It told them that guess what quality is your job to not just the test? Uh, department's a group. The fourth level that I think is really important, uh, in, in the current, uh, uh, situation that we're in is the level of engagement in your development organization. >>We used to joke that we measured this with the parking lot metric. How full was the parking lot at nine? And how full was it at five o'clock? I can't do that anymore since we're not physically co-located, but what you can do is you can look at how folks are delivering. You can look at your metrics in your SCM environment. You can look at, uh, the relative rates of churn. Uh, you can look at things like, well, are our developers delivering, uh, during longer periods earlier in the morning, later in the evening, are they delivering, uh, you know, on the weekends as well? Are those signs that we might be heading toward a burnout because folks are still running at sprint levels instead of marathon levels. Uh, so all of those in combination, uh, business value, uh, flow engagement in quality, I think form the backbone of any sort of, of metrics, uh, uh, a program. >>The second thing that I think you need to look at is what are we going to do with the data and the philosophy behind the data is critical. Um, unfortunately I see organizations where they weaponize the data and that's completely the wrong way to look at it. What you need to do is you need to say, you need to say, how is this data helping us to identify the blockers? The things that aren't allowing us to provide the right context for people to do the right thing. And then what do we do to remove those blockers, uh, to make sure that we're giving these autonomous teams the context that they need to do their job, uh, in a way that creates the most value for the customer. >>Great advice stuff, Glenn, over to your metrics that matter to you that really make a big, and also, >>How do you measure quality kind of following onto the advice that Jeff provided? I mean, Jeff provided some great advice. Actually, he talks about value. He talks about flow. Both of those things are very much on my mind at the moment. Um, but there was this, I listened to a speaker called me Kirsten a couple of months ago. It talked very much about how important flight management is and removing, you know, and using that to remove waste, to understand in terms of, you know, making software changes, um, what is it that's causing us to do it longer than we need to. So where are those areas where it takes too long? So I think that's a very important thing for us. It's, um, even more basic than that at the moment, we're on a journey from moving from kind of a waterfall to agile. Um, and the problem with moving from waterfall to agile is with waterfall, the, the business had a kind of comfort that, you know, everything was tested together and therefore it's safer. >>Um, and with agile, there's that kind of, how do we make sure that, you know, if we're doing things quick and we're getting stuff out the door that we give that confidence, um, that that's ready to go, or if there's a risk that we're able to truly articulate what that risk is. So there's a bit about release confidence, um, and some of the metrics around that and how healthy those releases are, and actually saying, you know, we spend a lot of money, um, um, an investment setting up, Pat, our teams training our teams, are we actually seeing them deliver more quickly and are we actually seeing them deliver more value quickly? So yeah, those are the two main things for me at the moment, but I think it's also about, you know, generally bringing it all together, the dev ops, you know, we've got the kind of value ops AI ops, how do we actually bring that together to so we can make quick decisions and making sure that we are delivering the biggest bang for our buck, absolutely biggest bang for the buck, surge, your thoughts. >>Yeah. So I think we all agree, right? It starts with business metrics, flow metrics. Um, these are kind of the most important metrics. And ultimately, I mean, one of the things that's very common across a highly functional teams is engagements, right? When, when you see a team that's highly functioning, that's agile, that practices DevOps every day, they are highly engaged. Um, that that's, that's definitely true. Now the, you know, back to, I think, uh, GemCis point on weaponization of metrics. One of the key challenges we see is that, um, organizations traditionally have been kind of, uh, you know, setting up benchmarks, right? So what is a good cycle time? What is a good lead time? What is a good meantime to repair? The, the problem is that this is very contextual, right? It varies. It's going to vary quite a bit, depending on the nature of application and system. And so one of the things that we really need to evolve, um, as an industry is to understand that it's not so much about those flow metrics is about, are these four metrics ultimately contribute to the business metric to the business outcome. So that's one thing, the second aspect, I think that's oftentimes misunderstood. >>Yeah. >>So that cycle time, or, or, or what you perceive as being a buy cycle time or better quality, the problem is oftentimes like all, do you go and explore why, right. What is the root cause of this? And I think one of the key challenges is that we tend to focus a lot of time on metrics and not on the eye type patterns, which are pretty common across the industry. Um, you know, you look at, for instance, things like, you know, lead time, for instance, it's very common that, uh, organizational boundaries are going to be a key contributor to badly time. And so I think that there is, you know, the metrics there is, I think a lot of, uh, work that we need to do in terms of classifying this antibiograms, um, you know, back to you, Jeff, I think you're one of the cool offers of waterscrumfall as a, as a, as a key patterning industry or anti-fat. Um, but what our scrum fall right, is a key one, right. And you will detect that through defect, arrival rates. That's where that looks like an escort. And so I think it's beyond kind of the metrics is what do you do with those metrics? >>Right? I'll tell you a search. One of the things that is really interesting to me in that space is I think those of us had been in industry for a long time. We know the anti-patterns cause we've seen them in our career maybe in multiple times. And one of the things that I think you could see tooling do is perhaps provide some notification of anti-patterns based on the telemetry that comes in. I think it would be a really interesting place to apply, uh, machine learning and reinforcement learning techniques. Um, so hopefully something that we'd see in the future with dev ops tools, because, you know, as a manager that, that, you know, may be only a 10 year veteran or 15 year veteran, you may be seeing these anti-patterns for the first time. And it would sure be nice to know what to do, uh, when they start to pop up, >>That would right. Insight, always helpful. All right, guys, I would like to get your final thoughts on the fit. The one thing that you believe our audience really needs to be on the lookout for and to put on our agendas for the next 12 months, Jeff, we'll go back to you. >>I would say, look for the opportunities that this disruption presents. And there are a couple that I see, first of all, as we shift to remote central working, uh, we're unlocking new pools of talent, uh, we're, it's possible to implement, uh, more geographic diversity. So, so look to that as part of your strategy. Number two, look for new types of tools. We've seen a lot of interest in usage of low-code tools to very quickly develop applications. That's potentially part of a mainstream strategy as we go into 2021. Finally, make sure that you embrace this idea that you are supporting creative workers that agile and dev ops are the peanut butter and chocolate to support creative, uh, workers with algorithmic capabilities, >>Peanut butter and chocolate Glen, where do we go from there? What are, what's the one silver bullet that you think folks should be on the lookout for? >>I certainly agree that, um, low, low code is, uh, next year. We'll see much more low code we'd already started going, moving towards a more of a SAS based world, but Loco also, um, I think as well for me, um, we've still got one foot in the kind of cow camp. Um, you know, we'll be fully trying to explore what that means going into the next year and, and exploiting the capabilities of cloud. But I think the last, um, the last thing for me is how do you really instill quality throughout the kind of, um, the life cycle, um, where, when I heard the word scrum for it kind of made me shut it because I know that's a problem. That's where we're at with some of our things at the moment. So we need to get beyond that. We need to be releasing, um, changes more frequently into production and actually being a bit more brave and having the confidence to actually do more testing in production in going straight to production itself. So expect to see much more of that next year. Um, yeah. Thank you. I haven't got any food analogies. Unfortunately >>We all need some peanut butter and chocolate. All right. It starts to take us on that's what's that nugget you think everyone needs to have on their agendas. >>That's interesting. Right. So a couple of days ago we had kind of a latest state of the DevOps report, right? And if you read through the report, it's, it's all about the lost city, right? It's all about, we still are receiving DevOps as being all about speed. And so to me, the key advice is in order to create kind of that spiritual collocation in order to foster engagement, we have to go back to what is it we're trying to do collectively. We have to go back to tie everything to the business outcome. And so for me, it's absolutely imperative for organizations to start to plot their value streams, to understand how they're delivering value and to align everything they do from a metrics to deliver it, to flow to those metrics. And only with that, I think, are we going to be able to actually start to really start to align kind of all these roles across the organizations and drive, not just speed, but business outcomes, >>All about business outcomes. I think you guys, the three of you could write a book together. So I'll give you that as food for thought. Thank you all so much for joining me today and our guests. I think this was an incredibly valuable fruitful conversation, and we appreciate all of you taking the time to spiritually co-located with us today, guys. Thank you. Thank you, Lisa. Thank you for Jeff Hammond serves Lucio and Glen Martin. I'm Lisa Martin. Thank you for watching the broad cops Broadcom dev ops virtual forum.

Published Date : Nov 20 2020

SUMMARY :

of dev ops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom. Great to have you all three together We're going to start with you spiritual co-location that's a really interesting topic that we've we've And that's one of the things that you see coming out of the agile Um, you know, surgeon, I worked together a long, long time ago, Talk to me about what your thoughts are about spiritual of co-location I think, you know, it starts with kind of a shared purpose and the other, I, So, um, you know, probably one of my, um, theories of experience was to actually And Glen, we talked a lot about transformation with you last time. And I've certainly found that with our, um, you know, continuing relationship with Broadcom, So it's really important that as I say, for a number of different aspects, that you have the right partner, um, around, you know, could they be doing better component testing? What are the metrics So that's one of the ways that you get to a shared purpose, cause we're all trying to deliver around that um, you know, some of the classics or maybe things like defect, density, or meantime to response. later in the evening, are they delivering, uh, you know, on the weekends as well? teams the context that they need to do their job, uh, in a way that creates the most value for the customer. the business had a kind of comfort that, you know, everything was tested together and therefore it's safer. Um, and with agile, there's that kind of, how do we make sure that, you know, if we're doing things quick and we're getting stuff out the door that And so one of the things that we really need to evolve, um, as an industry is to understand And so I think that there is, you know, the metrics there is, I think a lot of, And one of the things that I think you could see tooling do is The one thing that you believe our audience really needs to be on the lookout for and are the peanut butter and chocolate to support creative, uh, workers with algorithmic the last thing for me is how do you really instill quality throughout the kind of, It starts to take us on that's what's that nugget you think everyone needs to have on their agendas. And if you read through the report, it's, I think this was an incredibly valuable fruitful conversation, and we appreciate all of you

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

GlenPERSON

0.99+

GlennPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

LucioPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

Serge LucioPERSON

0.99+

Glen MartinPERSON

0.99+

Jeff HammondPERSON

0.99+

15 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

BroadcomORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

BenPERSON

0.99+

KirstenPERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

second aspectQUANTITY

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

Glenn MartinPERSON

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

five o'clockDATE

0.99+

one footQUANTITY

0.98+

PatPERSON

0.98+

second thingQUANTITY

0.98+

Glen JeffPERSON

0.98+

agileTITLE

0.97+

two main thingsQUANTITY

0.97+

first experimentsQUANTITY

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.97+

fourth levelQUANTITY

0.97+

first timeQUANTITY

0.96+

one thingQUANTITY

0.95+

SASORGANIZATION

0.95+

nineDATE

0.93+

firstQUANTITY

0.93+

2020DATE

0.93+

four metricsQUANTITY

0.92+

BTORGANIZATION

0.9+

couple of months agoDATE

0.88+

couple of days agoDATE

0.87+

one silver bulletQUANTITY

0.87+

last 20 yearsDATE

0.85+

next 12 monthsDATE

0.85+

DevOpsTITLE

0.83+

16 yearsQUANTITY

0.81+

LocoORGANIZATION

0.8+

10 years agoDATE

0.77+

three unique perspectivesQUANTITY

0.75+

Number twoQUANTITY

0.74+

coupleQUANTITY

0.7+

15QUANTITY

0.69+

GreenfieldORGANIZATION

0.69+

GemCisORGANIZATION

0.66+

ForesterLOCATION

0.51+

Serge Lucio, Broadcom | DevOps Virtual Forum 2020


 

>> From around the globe it's the CUBE with digital coverage of Devops Virtual Forum, brought to you by Broadcom. >> Continuing our conversations here at Broadcom's DevOps Virtual Forum. Lisa Martin here, please do welcome back to the program. Serge Lucio, the general manager of the Enterprise Software Division at Broadcom. Hey Serge welcome. >> Thank you. Good to be here. >> So I know you were just participating with the BizOps manifesto that just happened recently. I just had the chance to talk with Jeffrey Hammond and he unlocked this really interesting concept but I wanted to get your thoughts on, spiritual co-location as really a necessity for BizOps to succeed in this unusual time in which we're living. What are your thoughts on spiritual co-location in terms of cultural change versus adoption of technologies? >> Yeah, it's quite interesting, right. When we think about the major impediments for DevOps implementation, that means all about culture, right? And swore over the last 20 years we've been talking about silos. We'd be talking about the paradox for these teams too when it goes to align. And in many ways it's not so much about these teams aligning but about being in the same car, in the same books, right? It's really about fusing those teams around kind of the common purpose, a common objective. So to me this is really about kind of changing this culture where people start to look at kind of OKRs instead of the key objective that drives the entire team. Now, what it means in practice is really that's we need to change a lot of behaviors, right? It's not about the ER key, it's not about roles. It's about, you know, who can do what and when, and, you know, driving a bias towards action. It's also means that we need, I mean, especially in this COVID times it becomes very difficult, right? To drive kind of a kind of collaboration and affinity between these teams. And so I think there's a significant role that especially tools can play in terms of providing this conference feedback from teams to be in that preface spiritual qualification. >> Well, and it talked about culture being it's something that, you know, we're so used to talking about DevOps with respect to velocity, all about speed here. But of course this time everything changed so quickly but going from the physical spaces to everybody being remote really does take. It's very different than you can't replicate it digitally but there are collaboration tools that can kind of really be essential to help that cultural shift, right? >> Yeah, so to me we tend to talk about collaboration in a very mundane way, right? Of course we can use zoom. We can all get into the same room. But the point when I think when Jeff says spiritual co-location, it's really about, we all share the same objective. Do we have a means for instance, our pipeline, right? When you talk about DevOps probably we all started thinking about this continuous delivery pipeline that basically drives the automation, the orchestration across the team. But just thinking about a pipeline, right? At the end of the day, it's all about what is the meantime to feed back to these teams. If I'm a developer and I commit code, how long does it take for, you know, that code to be processed through pipeline or quick and I get feedback? If I am a finance person, who's funding a product or a project, what is my meantime to beat back? And so a lot of, kind of a, when we think about the pipeline, I think what's been really inspiring to me in the last year or so is that there is much more of an adoption of that door effect metrics. There is way more of a focus around value stream management. And to me, this is really when we talk about collaboration it's really a balance. How do you provide that feedback to the different stakeholders across the life cycle in a very timely matter? And that's what we would need to get to in terms of kind of this notion of collaboration. It's not so much about people being in the same physical space. It's about, you know, when checking code, you know, to do I guess the system to automatically identify what I'm going to break. If I'm about to release some allocation, how can the system help me reduce my change builder rate? Because it's able to predict that some issue was introduced in the application or the product. So I think there's a great role of technology and AI candidates to actually provide kind of that new level of collaboration. >> So we'll get to AI in a second but I'm curious, what are some of the metrics you think that really matter right now is organizations are still in some form probably of transformation to this new almost 100% remote workforce. >> So I'll just say first I'm not a big fan of metrics. And the reason being that, you know, you can look at a change failure rate, right, or a leak time or cycle time. And those are interesting metrics, right? The trend on metric is absolutely critical. But what's more important these I'll do get to the root cause. What is taught to you lead to that metric to degrade or improve over time. And so I'm much more interested and we, you know, fruit for Broadcom. Are we more interested in understanding what are the patterns that contribute to this? So I'll use a very mundane example. You know, we know that cycle time is heavily influenced by organizational boundaries. So, you know, we talk a lot about silos, but we we've worked with many of our customers doing value stream mapping. And oftentimes what you see is that really the boundaries of your organization creates a lot of idle time, right? So to me, it's less about the metrics. I think the door metrics are pretty, you know, valid set metrics but what's way more important is to understand, what are the anti parents? What are the things that we can detect through the data that actually are affecting those metrics? And I mean, over the last 10, 20 years, we've learned a lot about kind of what are the anti parents within our large enterprise customers? And there are plenty of them. >> What are some of the things that you're seeing now with respect to patterns that have developed over the last seven to eight months? >> So I think the two areas which clearly are evolving very quickly are on kind of the front end of the life cycle where DevOps is more and more embracing value stream management, value stream mapping. And I think what's interesting is that in many ways, the product is becoming the new silo. The notion of a product is very difficult by itself to actually define. People are starting to recognize that a value stream is not its own little kind of island. That in reality, when I did find a product this product, oftentimes as dependencies on our products and that in fact, you're looking at kind of a network of value streams, if you will. So on that and there is clearly kind of a new sets if you will of anti-patterns where, you know, products are being defined as a set of OTRs. They have interdependencies and you have to have a new set of silos. On the other hand the other kind of key movement to ease around the SRE space, where I think there is a cultural clash. While the DevOps side is very much embracing this notion of OTRs and value stream mapping and value management. On the other end, you have IT operations teams. We still think business services, right? For them they think about configure items, think about infrastructure. And so, you know, it's not uncommon to see, you know, teams where, you know, the operations team is still thinking about hundreds of thousands, tens of thousands of business services. And so there is this boundary where I think, well, SRE has been put in place, and there's lots of thinking about what kind of metrics can be defined. I think, you know, going back to culture, I think there's a lot of cultural evolution that's still required for, you know, true operations teams. >> And that's a hard thing. Cultural transformation in any industry pandemic or not is a challenging thing. You now talked about AI and automation of minutes ago. How do you think those technologies can be leveraged by DevOps leaders to influence their successes and their ability to collaborate and maybe see eye to eye with the SREs? >> Yeah, so there're kind of too, so even for myself, right? As a leader of , you know, 1500 people organization, there's a number of things I don't see, right, on a daily basis. And I think the technologies that we have at our disposal today from the AI are able to mine a lot of data and expose a lot of issues that as leaders we may not be aware of. And some of these are pretty kind of easy to understand, right? We all think we're agile. And yet when you start to understand, for instance, what is the is a work in progress, right, during the sprint? When you start to analyze the data you can detect for instance, that maybe the teams are over committed, that there is too much work in profits. You can start to identify kind of interprocess either from a technology or from a people point of view, which were hidden. You can start to understand that maybe the change failure rate is dragging. So I believe that there is a fundamental role to be played by the tools to expose again these anti parents. To make these things visible to the teams to be able to even compare teams, right? One of the things that's amazing is now we have access to tons of data not just from a given customer, but across a large number of customers. And so we start to compare all of these teams kind of operate and what's working, what's not working. >> Thoughts on AI and automation as a facilitator of spiritual co-location? >> Yeah, absolutely. It's, you know, there's a the problem we all face is the unknown, right? The velocity, the volume, variety of the data, every day we don't really necessarily completely appreciate what is the impact of our actions, right? And so AI can really act as a safety net that enables us to understand what is the impact of our actions. And so, yeah, in many ways, the ability to be informed in a timely matter to be able to interact with people on the basis of data and collaborate on the data in the actual matter, I think is a very powerful enabler on, in that respect. I mean, I've seen countless of times that for instance at the SRE boundary to basically show that we'll turn the quality attributes of an incoming release, right? And exposing that to an operations person, an SRE person and enabling that collaboration dialogue through there is a very, very powerful tool. >> Do you have any recommendations for how teams can use, you know, the SRE folks, the DevOps says can use AI and automation in the right ways to be successful rather than some ways that aren't going to be non-productive. >> Yeah, so to me there's a part that the question really is when we talk about data. There are different ways you can use data, right? So you can do a lot of analytics, predictive analytics. So I think there is a tendency to look at, let's say a specific KPI, like an availability KPI or change failure rate. And to basically do a regression analysis and projecting all these things is going to happen in the future. To me that's a bad approach. The reason why I fundamentally think it's a better approach is because we, our systems the way we develop software is a non-leader kind of system, right? Software development is not linear in nature. And so I think there's a, this is probably the worst approach is to actually focus on metrics. On the other hand if you start to actually understand at a more granular level, what are the things which are contributing to this, right? So if you start to understand, for instance that whenever maybe, you know, you affect a specific part of the application that translates into production issues. So we have, I've actually a customer who identified that over 50% of their unplanned outages were related to specific components in your architecture. And whenever these components were changed this resulted in this implant outages. So if you start to be able to basically establish causality, right? Cause an effect between kind of data across the last cycle. I think this is the right way to use AI. And so pharma to be, I think it's way more about kind of a classification problem. What are the causes of problems that do exist and affect things as opposed to an hourly predictive which I don't think is as powerful? >> So I mentioned in the beginning of our conversation that just came off the BizOps manifesto. You're one of the authors of that. I want to get your thoughts on DevOps and BizOps overlapping, complimenting each other. What, from the BizOps perspective, what does it mean to the future of DevOps? >> Yeah, so it's interesting, right? If you think about DevOps, there's no founding document, right? We can refer to the Phoenix project. I mean, there are a set of documents which have been written, but in many ways there is no clear definition of what DevOps is. If you go to the DevOps Institute today you'll see that, you know, they are specific trainings for instance on value management on SRE. And so in many ways, the problem we have as an industry is that there are set practices between agile, DevOps, SRE, value stream management, Ital, right? And we all basically talk about the same things, right? We all talk about essentially accelerating in the meantime to feedback, but yet we don't have a common framework to talk about that. The other key thing is that we add to wait for genius, Jean Kim's last book to really start to get into the business aspect, right? And for value mapping to start to emerge for us to start as an industry, right? IT to start to think about what is our connection with the business aspect, what's our purpose, right? And ultimately it's all about kind of driving these business outcomes. And so to me, BizOps is really about kind of putting a lens on kind of this critical element that it's not business and IT that we in fact need to fuse business and IT. That I need needs to transform itself to recognize that it's this value generator, right? It's not a cost center. And so the relationship to me, it's more than BizOps provides kind of this over all kind of framework, if you will. That set the context for what is the reason for IT to exist. What are the core values and principles that IT needs to embrace to, again, change from cost center to value center. And then we need to start to use this as a way to start to unify some of, again, the core practices, whether it's agile, DevOps, value stream mapping, SRE. So, I think over time, my hope is that we start to organize a lot of our practices, language and cultural elements. >> Last question Serge in the last few seconds we have here, talking about this, the relation between BizOps and DevOps. What do you think as DevOps evolves? And as you talked to circle some of your insights, what should our audience keep their eyes on in the next six to 12 months? >> So to me the key challenge for the industry is really around. So we were seeing a very rapid shift towards kind of project to product, right? Which we don't want to do is to recreate kind of these new silos, these hard silos. So that's one of the big changes that I think we need to be really careful about. Because it is ultimately, it is about culture. It's not about kind of how we segment the work, right? And any true culture that we can overcome kind of silos. So back to, I guess, with Jeffrey's concept of kind of the spiritual co-location, I think it's really about that too. It's really about kind of focusing on the business outcomes on kind of aligning, on driving engagement across the teams, but not for create kind of a new set of silos which instead of being vertical are going to be these horizontal products. >> Great advice Serge that looking at culture as kind of a way of really addressing and helping to reduce, replace challenges. We thank you so much for sharing your insights and your time at today's DevOps Virtual Forum. >> Thank you. Thanks for your time. Serge Lucio, Lisa Martin, we'll be right back. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Nov 20 2020

SUMMARY :

brought to you by Broadcom. of the Enterprise Software Good to be here. I just had the chance to around kind of the common of really be essential to help I guess the system to automatically what are some of the metrics you think What is taught to you lead On the other end, you and maybe see eye to eye with the SREs? the AI are able to mine the ability to be informed and automation in the right of data across the last cycle. that just came off the BizOps manifesto. in the meantime to feedback, on in the next six to 12 months? of the spiritual co-location, as kind of a way of really Thanks for your time.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

Serge LucioPERSON

0.99+

SergePERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

Jean KimPERSON

0.99+

BroadcomORGANIZATION

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

DevOps InstituteORGANIZATION

0.99+

two areasQUANTITY

0.99+

over 50%QUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.98+

DevOpsTITLE

0.98+

1500 peopleQUANTITY

0.98+

tens of thousandsQUANTITY

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

todayDATE

0.96+

agileTITLE

0.96+

firstQUANTITY

0.95+

oneQUANTITY

0.94+

almost 100%QUANTITY

0.93+

12 monthsQUANTITY

0.92+

BizOpsTITLE

0.89+

secondQUANTITY

0.88+

hundreds of thousandsQUANTITY

0.85+

eight monthsQUANTITY

0.83+

PhoenixLOCATION

0.81+

Enterprise Software DivisionORGANIZATION

0.81+

last 20 yearsDATE

0.77+

2020DATE

0.75+

minutesDATE

0.74+

SRETITLE

0.67+

10, 20 yearsQUANTITY

0.66+

aboutQUANTITY

0.65+

tons of dataQUANTITY

0.62+

ItalTITLE

0.61+

sixQUANTITY

0.57+

DevOps Virtual ForumEVENT

0.55+

ForumEVENT

0.52+

BizOpsORGANIZATION

0.52+

Virtual ForumEVENT

0.51+

DevOpsORGANIZATION

0.5+

COVIDOTHER

0.5+

lastQUANTITY

0.47+

lastDATE

0.45+

sevenQUANTITY

0.43+

DevopsORGANIZATION

0.38+

Sam Werner, IBM and Brent Compton, Red Hat | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2020


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with coverage of Yukon and Cloud. Native Con North America. 2020. Virtual Brought to You by Red Hat, The Cloud, Native Computing Foundation and Ecosystem Partners. Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeffrey here with the Cube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios with our ongoing coverage of Q. Khan Cloud, Native Con 2020 North America. Of course, it's virtual like everything else is in 2020 but we're excited to be back. It's a terrific show, and we're excited our next guest. So let's introduce him. And we've got Sam Warner, the VP of offering manager and business line executive for storage for IBM. Sam. Great to see you. >>Great to be here. >>And also joining us is Brent Compton. He's a senior director of data services for Redhead. Great. See you, Brent. >>Thank you. >>So let's let's jump into it. Cloud Native. Everything's about cloud native. Everything's about containers. Everything is about kind of container ization and flexibility. But then there's this thing in the back and called storage. We actually have toe keep this stuff and record this stuff and have data protection for this stuff in business resiliency love to jump into it, so lets you know where does storage fit within a container world? And how is the growth of containers and the adoption containers really had you rethink the way that you think about storage and how clients you think about stories saying, Let's start with you >>e mean, it's a great question. And first off, I'm really excited about another cube con. Uh, we did Europe now, uh, doing North America so very excited to be, you know, seeing all the you know, all the news and all the people talking about the advancements around kubernetes. And we're very excited about it now. You asked a very good question. Important question. We're seeing an acceleration of digital transformation, and the people that are going through this digital transformation are using containers to now modernize the rest of their infrastructure. The interesting thing about it, though, is those initiatives are being driven out of the application teams. The business lines in an organization, and a lot of them don't understand that there's a lot of complexity to this storage piece here. So the storage teams I talked to are all of a sudden getting these initiatives thrown on them or a kind of halfway their strategy. And they're scratching their heads, trying to figure out now how they can support these applications with persistent storage. Because that's not where containers started. They started with micro services, and now now they're in a quandary. They have to deliver a certain S L. A to their customers, and they're trying to figure out how they do it in this new environment, which in a lot of cases, has been designed outside of their scope. So they're seeing issues with data protection. Some of the kind of core things that they've been dealing with for years are now. They're now having to solve all over again. So that's what we're working on helping them with reinventing how storage is deployed to help them deliver the same level of security, availability and everything they have in the past. Uh, in these new environments, >>right? So, yeah, e say you've been involved in this for a long time. You know, you've worked in hyper converge. You've worked in big data. You know, the evolution of big data continues to change, as ultimately we want to get people the information to make good decisions, but we've gone through a lot of integrations over the years. So how is it different? You know? Now how is it different with containers? What can we finally do you as a as an architect that we couldn't do before? >>Infrastructure is code. That's, I think, one of the fundamental differences of the storage admin of yesteryear versus storage admin of today today, Azaz Sam mentioned As people are developing and deploying applications, those applications need to dynamically provisioned the infrastructure dynamically provisioned what they need from compute dynamically provisioned what they need from storage dynamically provisioned network paths and so that that that element of infrastructure is code. A dynamically provisioned infrastructure is very different from well from yesterday, when applications or teams needed to. Well, when they needed storage, they would you know, they would file a ticket and typically wait. Now they make an a p A. Now they make an A p. I call and storage is dynamically provisioned and provided to their application. >>But what what I think hard to understand for the layman. And maybe it's just me, right? I It's very easy to understand dynamic infrastructure around, um compute right, I'm Pepsi. I'm running it out for the Super Bowl. I need I know how much people are gonna hit by hit my site and it's kind of easy to understand. Dynamic provisioning around networking again for the same example. What's less easy to understand its dynamic provisioning for storage? It's one thing to say, you know, there's a there's a pool of storage resource is that I'm going to dynamically provisioned for this particular after this particular moment. But one of the whole things about the dynamic is not only is it available when you need it, but I could make it big, and conversely, I could make it smaller go away. I get that for servers, and I kind of get that for networking, supporting an application and that example I just talked about. But we can't It doesn't go away a lot of the time for storage, right? That's important data that's maybe feeding another process. There's all kinds of rules and regulations, So when you talk about dynamic infrastructure for storage, it makes a lot of sense for grabbing some to provision for some new application. But it's >>hard to >>understand in terms of true dynamics in terms of either scaling down or scaling up or turning off when I don't particularly need that much capacity or even that application right now, how does it work within storage versus No, just servers or I'm grabbing them and then I'm putting it back in the pool. >>Let me start on this one, and then I'm gonna hand it off to Brent. Um, you know, let's not forget, by the way, that enterprises have very significant investments in infrastructure and they're able to deliver six nines of availability on their storage. And they have d are worked out in all of their security, encryption, everything. It's already in place, and they're sure that they can deliver on their SLS. So they want to start with that. You have to leverage that investment. So first of all, you have to figure out how to automate that into the environment, that existing sand, and that's where things like uh, a P I s the container storage interface CS I drivers come in. IBM provides that across your entire portfolio, allowing you to integrate your storage into a kubernetes environment into an open shipped environment so that it can be automated, but you have to go beyond that and be able to extend that environment, then into other infrastructure, for example, into a public cloud. So with the IBM flash system, family with our spectrum virtualized software were actually able to deploy that storage layer not only on Prem on our award winning a race, but we can also do it in the cloud. So we allow you to take your existing infrastructure investments and integrate that into your communities environment and using things like danceable, fully automated environment. I'll get into data protection before we're done talking. But I do want Brent to talk a bit about how container native storage comes into that next as well. On how you can start building out new environments for, uh, for your applications. >>Yeah, What the two of you are alluding to is effectively kubernetes services layer, which is not storage. It consumes storage from the infrastructure, Assam said. Just because people deploy Kubernetes cluster doesn't mean that they go out and get an entirely new infrastructure for that. If they're deploying their kubernetes cluster on premises, they have servers. If they're deploying their kubernetes cluster on AWS or an azure on G C P. They have infrastructure there. Uh, what the two of you are alluding to is that services layer, which is independent of storage that can dynamically provisioned, provide data protection services. As I mentioned, we have good stuff to talk about their relative to data protection services for kubernetes clusters. But that's it's the abstraction layer or data services layer that sits on top of storage, which is different. So the basics of storage underneath in the infrastructure, you know, remain the same, Jeff. But the how that storage is provisioned and this abstraction layer of services which sits on top of the storage storage might be IBM flash system array storage, maybe E m c sand storage, maybe a W S E B s. That's the storage infrastructure. But this abstraction layer that sits on top this data services layer is what allows for the dynamic interaction of applications with the underlying storage infrastructure. >>And then again, just for people that aren't completely tuned in, Then what's the benefit to the application developer provider distributor with that type of an infrastructure behind And what can they do that they just couldn't do before? >>Well, I mean Look, we're, uh, e I mean, we're trying to solve the same problem over and over again, right? It's always about helping application developers build applications more quickly helps them be more agile. I t is always trying to keep up with the application developer and always struggles to. In fact, that's where the emergency cloud really came from. Just trying to keep up with the developer eso by giving them that automation. It gives them the ability to provision storage in real time, of course, without having open a ticket like friends said. But really, the Holy Grail here is getting to a developed once and deploy anywhere model. That's what they're trying to get to. So having an automated storage layer allows them to do that and ensure that they have access to storage and data, no matter where their application gets it >>right, Right, that pesky little detail. When I have to develop that up, it does have to sit somewhere and and I don't think storage really has gotten enough of of the bright light, really in kind of this app centric, developer centric world, we talk all the time about having compute available and and software defined networking. But you know, having this software defined storage that lives comfortably in this container world is pretty is pretty interesting. In a great development, I want to shift gears a >>little bit. Just one thing. Go >>ahead, >>plus one to Sam's comments. There all the application developer wants, they want an A P I and they want the same a p I to provision the storage regardless of where their app is running. The rest of the details they usually don't care about. Sure. They wanted to perform what not give him an A p I and make it the same regardless of where they're running the app. >>Because not only do they want to perform, they probably just presume performance, right? I mean, that's the other thing is that the best in class quickly becomes presumed baseline in a very short short period of time. So you've got to just you just got to just deliver the goods, right? They're gonna get frustrated and not be productive. But I wanted to shift gears up a little bit and talk about some of the macro trends. Right? We're here towards the end of 2020. Obviously, Cove It had a huge impact on business and a lot of different ways. And it's really evolved from March, this light switch moment. Everybody work from home, too. Now, this kind of extended time, that's probably gonna go on for a while. I'm just curious some of the things that you've seen with your customers not so much at the beginning, because that was that was a special and short period of time. But mawr, as we've extended and and are looking to, um, probably extended this for a while, you know, What is the impact of this increased work from home increase attack surface? You know, some of these macro things that we're seeing that cove it has caused and any other kind of macro trends beyond just this container ization that you guys were seeing impacting your world. Start with you, Sam. >>You know, I don't think it's actually changed what people were going to do or the strategy. What I've seen it do is accelerate things and maybe changed the way they're getting their, uh and so they're actually a lot of enterprises were running into challenges more quickly than they thought they would. And so they're coming to us and asking us to help them. Saw them, for example, backing up their data and these container environments as you move mission critical applications that maybe we're gonna move more slowly. They're realizing that as they've moved them, they can't get the level of data protection they need. And that's why actually we just announced it at the end of October. Updates to our modern data protection portfolio. It now is containerized. It could be deployed very easily in an automated fashion, but on top of that, it integrates down into the A P. I layer down into CSE drivers and allows you to do container where snapshots of your applications so you could do operational recovery. If there's some sort of an event you can recover from that you can do D R. And you can even use it for data migration. So we're helping them accelerate. So the biggest I think requests I'm getting from our customers, and how can you help us accelerate? And how can you help us fix these problems that we went running into as we tried to accelerate our digital transformation? >>Brent, Anyone that you wanna highlight? >>Mm. Okay. Ironically, one of my team was just speaking with one of the cruise lines, um, two days ago. We all know what's happened them. So if we just use them as an example, I'm clearly our customers need to do things differently now. So plus one to Sam's statement about acceleration on I would add another word to that which is agility, you know, frankly, they're having to do things in ways they never envisioned 10 months ago. So there need to cut cycle times to deploy effectively new ways of how they transact business has resulted in accelerated poll for these types of infrastructure is code technologies. >>That's great. The one that jumped in my mind. Sam, is you were talking. We've we've had a lot of conversations. Obvious security always comes up on baking security and is is a theme. But ransomware as a specific type of security threat and the fact that these guys not only wanna lock up your data, but they want to go in and find the backup copies and and you know and really mess you up so it sounds like that's even more important to have the safe. And we're hearing, you know, all these conversations about air gaps and dynamic air gaps and, you know, can we get air gaps and some of these infrastructure set up so that we can, you know, put put those backups? Um, and recovery data sets in a safe place so that if we have a ransomware issue, getting back online is a really, really important thing, and it seems to just be increasing every day. We're seeing things, you know, if you can actually break the law sometimes if you if you pay the ransom because where these people operate, there's all kind of weird stuff that's coming out of. Ransomware is a very specific, you know, kind of type of security threat that even elevates, you know, kind of business continuity and resiliency on a whole nother level for this one particular risk factor. When if you're seeing some of that as well, >>it's a great point. In fact, it's clearly an industry that was resilient to a pandemic because we've seen it increase things. Is organized crime at this point, right? This isn't the old days of hackers, you know, playing around this is organized crime and it is accelerating. And that's one thing. I'm really glad you brought up. It's an area we've been really focused on across our whole portfolio. Of course, IBM tape offers the best most of the actual riel air gapping, physical air gapping We could take a cartridge offline. But beyond that we offer you the ability to dio you know, different types of logical air gaps, whether it's to a cloud we support. In fact, we just announced Now the spectrum protect. We have support for Google Cloud. We already supported AWS Azure IBM Cloud. So we give you the ability to do logical air gapping off to those different cloud environments. We give you the ability to use worm capability so you can put your backups in a vault that can't be changed. So we give you lots of different ways to do it. In our high end enterprise storage, we offer something called Safeguarded copy where we'll actually take data off line that could be recovered almost instantly. Something very unique to our storage that gives you, for the most mission critical applications. The fastest path recovery. One of things we've seen is some of our customers have done a great job creating a copy. But when the event actually happens, they find is gonna take too long to recover the data and they end up having to pay the ransom anyway. So you really have to think through an Indian strategy on we're able to help customers do a kind of health checks of their environment and figure out the right strategy. We have some offerings to help come in and do that for our customers. >>Shift gears a little bit, uh, were unanswerable fest earlier this year and a lot of talk about automation. Obviously, answer was part of the Red Hat family, which is part of the IBM family. But, you know, we're seeing Mawr and Mawr conversations about automation about, you know, moving the mundane and the air prone and all the things that we shouldn't be doing as people and letting people doom or high value stuff. When if you could talk a little bit about the role of automation, that the kind of development of automation and how you're seeing that, you know, impact your deployments, >>right? You want to take that one first? >>Yeah, sure. Um, s o the first is, um when you think about individual kubernetes clusters. There's a level of automation that's required there. I mean, that's the fundamental. I mean, back to the infrastructure is code that's inherently. That's automation. To effectively declare the state of what you want your application, your cluster to be, and that's the essence of kubernetes. You declare what the state is, and then you pass that declaration to kubernetes, and it makes it so. So there's the kubernetes level automation. But then there's, You know what happens for larger enterprises when you have, you know, tens or hundreds of kubernetes clusters. Eso That's an area of Jeff you mentioned answerable. Now that's an area of with, you know, the work, the red hats doing the community for multi cluster management, actually in the community and together with IBM for automating the management of multiple clusters. And last thing I'll touch on here is that's particularly important as you go to the edge. I mean, this is all well and good when you're talking about, you know, safe raised floor data center environments. But what happens when you're tens or hundreds or even thousands of kubernetes clusters are running in an oil field somewhere? Automation becomes not only nice to have, but it's fundamental to the operation. >>Yeah, but let me just add onto that real quick. You know, it's funny, because actually, in this cove it era, you're starting to see that same requirement in the data center in the core data center. In fact, I would say that because there's less bodies now in the data center, more people working remotely. The automation in need for automation is actually actually accelerating as well. So I think what you said is actually true for the core data center now as well, >>right? So I wanna give you guys the last word before before we close the segment. Um, I'm gonna start with you, Brent. Really, From a perspective of big data and you've been involved again in big data for a long time. As you look back, it kind of the data warehouse era. And then we had kind of this whole rage with the Hadoop era, and, you know, we just continue to get more and more sophisticated with big data processes and applications. But at the end of the day, still about getting the right data to the right person at the right time to do something about it. I wonder if if you can, you know, kind of reflect over that journey and where we are now in terms of this mission of getting, you know, the right data to the right person at the right time so they could make the right decision. >>I think I'll close with accessibility. Um, that Z these days, we you know, the data scientists and data engineers that we work with. The key problem that they have is is accessibility and sharing of data. I mean, this has been wonderfully manifest. In fact, we did some work with the province of Ontario. You could look that stop hashtag house my flattening eso the work with them to get a pool of data. Scientists in the community in the province of Ontario, Canada, toe work together toe understand how to track co vid cases s such so that government could make intelligent responses and policy based on based on the fax so that that need highlights the accessibility that's required from today's, you know, yesteryear. It was maybe, uh, smaller groups of individual data scientists working in silos. Now it's people across industry as manifest by that That need accessibility as well as agility. They need to be able to spin up an environment that will allow them to in this case, um, to develop and deploy inference models using shared data sets without going through years of design. So accessibility on back to the back to the the acceleration and agility that Sam talked about. So I'll close with those words >>That's great. And the consistent with the democratization of two is another word that we're here, you know, over and over again in terms of, you know, getting it out of the hands of the data scientists and getting it into the hands of the people who are making frontline business decisions every day. And Sam for you, for your clothes. I love for you Thio reflect on kind of the changing environment in terms of your requirements for the types of workloads that you now are, you know, looking to support. So it's not just taking care of the data center and relatively straightforward stuff. But you've got hybrid. You've got multi cloud, not to mention all the media, the developments in the media between tape and obviously flash, um, spinning, spinning drives. But you know, really, We've seen this huge thing with flash. But now, with cloud and the increased kind of autumn autonomy ization of of units to be able to apply big batches in small batches to particular workloads across all these different requirements. When if you could just share a little bit about how you guys are thinking about, you know, modernizing storage and moving storage forward. What are some of your what are some of your your priorities? What are you looking forward to, uh, to be able to deliver, You know, basically the stuff underneath all these other applications. I mean, applications basically is data whether you I and some in some computer on top. You guys something underneath the whole package? >>Yeah. Yeah. You know, first of all, you know, back toe what Brent was saying, Uh, data could be the most valuable asset of an enterprise. You could give an enterprising, incredible, uh, competitive advantage as an incumbent if you could take advantage of that data using modern analytics and a I. So it could be your greatest asset. And it can also be the biggest inhibitor to digital transformation. If you don't figure out how to build a new type of modern infrastructure to support access to that data and support these new deployment models of your application. So you have to think that through. And that's not just for your big data, which the big data, of course, is extremely important and growing at incredible pace. All this unstructured data, You also have to think about your mission critical applications. We see a lot of people going through their transformation and modernization of S a p with move toe s four Hana. They have to think about how that fits into a multi cloud environment. They need to think about the life cycle of their data is they go into these new modern environments. And, yes, tape is still a very vibrant part of that deployment. So what we're working on an IBM has always been a leader in software defined storage. We have an incredible portfolio of capabilities. We're working on modernizing that software to help you automate your infrastructure. And sure, you can deliver enterprise class sls. There's no nobody's going to alleviate the requirements of having, you know, near perfect availability. You don't because you're moving into a kubernetes environment. Get a break on your downtime. So we're able to give that riel enterprise class support for doing that. One of the things we just announced that the end of October was we've containerized our spectrum scale client, allowing you now toe automate the deployment of your cluster file system through communities. So you'll see more and more of that. We're offering you leading modern native protection for kubernetes will be the first to integrate with OCP and open ship container storage for data protection. And our flashes from family will continue to be on the leading edge of the curve around answerable automation and C s I integration with who are already so we'll continue to focus on that and ensure that you could take advantage of our world class storage products in your new modern environment. And, of course, giving you that portability between on from in any cloud that you choose to run in >>exciting times. No, no shortage of job security for you, gentlemen, that's for sure. All right, Well, Brent, Sam, thanks for taking a few minutes and, uh, is great to catch up. And again. Congratulations on the success. Thank you. Thank you. Thank you. Alrighty, Sammy's Brent. I'm Jeff, You're watching the cubes. Continuing coverage of Q. Khan Cloud, Native Con North America 2020. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.

Published Date : Nov 18 2020

SUMMARY :

Jeffrey here with the Cube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios with our ongoing coverage of And also joining us is Brent Compton. to jump into it, so lets you know where does storage fit within a container to be, you know, seeing all the you know, all the news and What can we finally do you as a as an architect Well, when they needed storage, they would you But one of the whole things about the dynamic is not only is it available when you need how does it work within storage versus No, just servers or I'm grabbing them and then I'm putting it back in the pool. So we allow you to take your existing infrastructure investments Yeah, What the two of you are alluding to is effectively kubernetes services layer, But really, the Holy Grail here is getting to a developed once and deploy anywhere But you know, having this software defined storage Just one thing. The rest of the details they usually don't care about. and are looking to, um, probably extended this for a while, you know, What is the impact of this increased So the biggest I think requests I'm getting from our customers, and how can you help us accelerate? on I would add another word to that which is agility, you know, frankly, they're having to do things And we're hearing, you know, all these conversations about air gaps and dynamic air gaps and, you know, But beyond that we offer you the ability to dio you know, different types of logical air gaps, that the kind of development of automation and how you're seeing that, you know, impact your deployments, To effectively declare the state of what you want your application, So I think what you said is actually true for the core data center of getting, you know, the right data to the right person at the right time so they could make the right decision. we you know, the data scientists and data engineers that we work with. the types of workloads that you now are, you know, looking to support. that software to help you automate your infrastructure. We'll see you next time.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
SamPERSON

0.99+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Brent ComptonPERSON

0.99+

Sam WarnerPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

BrentPERSON

0.99+

Native Computing FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

RedheadORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

Sam WernerPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

SammyPERSON

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Ecosystem PartnersORGANIZATION

0.99+

hundredsQUANTITY

0.99+

The CloudORGANIZATION

0.99+

tensQUANTITY

0.99+

Super BowlEVENT

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

North AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

10 months agoDATE

0.99+

MawrPERSON

0.99+

end of 2020DATE

0.99+

two days agoDATE

0.99+

Q. KhanPERSON

0.99+

PepsiORGANIZATION

0.99+

MarchDATE

0.98+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.98+

Azaz SamPERSON

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

AssamPERSON

0.98+

KubeConEVENT

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

CloudNativeConEVENT

0.97+

OntarioLOCATION

0.96+

end of OctoberDATE

0.96+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

one thingQUANTITY

0.95+

earlier this yearDATE

0.95+

ThioPERSON

0.92+

six ninesQUANTITY

0.91+

CloudORGANIZATION

0.9+

Q. KhanPERSON

0.89+

Ontario, CanadaLOCATION

0.87+

NA 2020EVENT

0.85+

thousands of kubernetesQUANTITY

0.84+

coveORGANIZATION

0.82+

G C P.TITLE

0.8+

kubernetesQUANTITY

0.8+

DevOps Virtual Forum 2020 | Broadcom


 

>>From around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of dev ops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom. >>Hi, Lisa Martin here covering the Broadcom dev ops virtual forum. I'm very pleased to be joined today by a cube alumni, Jeffrey Hammond, the vice president and principal analyst serving CIO is at Forester. Jeffrey. Nice to talk with you today. >>Good morning. It's good to be here. Yeah. >>So a virtual forum, great opportunity to engage with our audiences so much has changed in the last it's an understatement, right? Or it's an overstated thing, but it's an obvious, so much has changed when we think of dev ops. One of the things that we think of is speed, you know, enabling organizations to be able to better serve customers or adapt to changing markets like we're in now, speaking of the need to adapt, talk to us about what you're seeing with respect to dev ops and agile in the age of COVID, what are things looking like? >>Yeah, I think that, um, for most organizations, we're in a, uh, a period of adjustment, uh, when we initially started, it was essentially a sprint, you know, you run as hard as you can for as fast as you can for as long as you can and you just kind of power through it. And, and that's actually what, um, the folks that get hub saw in may when they ran an analysis of how developers, uh, commit times and a level of work that they were committing and how they were working, uh, in the first couple of months of COVID was, was progressing. They found that developers, at least in the Pacific time zone were actually increasing their work volume, maybe because they didn't have two hour commutes or maybe because they were stuck away in their homes, but for whatever reason, they were doing more work. >>And it's almost like, you know, if you've ever run a marathon the first mile or two in the marathon, you feel great and you just want to run and you want to power through it and you want to go hard. And if you do that by the time you get to mile 18 or 19, you're going to be gassed. It's sucking for wind. Uh, and, and that's, I think where we're starting to hit. So as we start to, um, gear our development chops out for the reality that most of us won't be returning into an office until 2021 at the earliest and many organizations will, will be fundamentally changing, uh, their remote workforce, uh, policies. We have to make sure that the agile processes that we use and the dev ops processes and tools that we use to support these teams are essentially aligned to help developers run that marathon instead of just kind of power through. >>So, um, let me give you a couple of specifics for many organizations, they have been in an environment where they will, um, tolerate Rover remote work and what I would call remote work around the edges like developers can be remote, but product managers and, um, you know, essentially scrum masters and all the administrators that are running the, uh, uh, the SCM repositories and, and the dev ops pipelines are all in the office. And it's essentially centralized work. That's not, we are anymore. We're moving from remote workers at the edge to remote workers at the center of what we do. And so one of the implications of that is that, um, we have to think about all the activities that you need to do from a dev ops perspective or from an agile perspective, they have to be remote people. One of the things I found with some of the organizations I talked to early on was there were things that administrators had to do that required them to go into the office to reboot the SCM server as an example, or to make sure that the final approvals for production, uh, were made. >>And so the code could be moved into the production environment. And so it actually was a little bit difficult because they had to get specific approval from the HR organizations to actually be allowed to go into the office in some States. And so one of the, the results of that is that while we've traditionally said, you know, tools are important, but they're not as important as culture as structure as organization as process. I think we have to rethink that a little bit because to the extent that tools enable us to be more digitally organized and to hiring, you know, achieve higher levels of digitization in our processes and be able to support the idea of remote workers in the center. They're now on an equal footing with so many of the other levers, uh, that, that, um, uh, that organizations have at their disposal. Um, I'll give you another example for years. >>We've said that the key to success with agile at the team level is cross-functional co located teams that are working together physically co located. It's the easiest way to show agile success. We can't do that anymore. We can't be physically located at least for the foreseeable future. So, you know, how do you take the low hanging fruits of an agile transformation and apply it in, in, in, in the time of COVID? Well, I think what you have to do is that you have to look at what physical co-location has enabled in the past and understand that it's not so much the fact that we're together looking at each other across the table. It's the fact that we're able to get into a shared mindspace, uh, from, um, uh, from a measurement perspective, we can have shared purpose. We can engage in high bandwidth communications. It's the spiritual aspect of that physical co-location that is actually important. So one of the biggest things that organizations need to start to ask themselves is how do we achieve spiritual colocation with our agile teams? Because we don't have the, the ease of physical co-location available to us anymore? >>Well, the spiritual co-location is such an interesting kind of provocative phrase there, but something that probably was a challenge here, we are seven, eight months in for many organizations, as you say, going from, you know, physical workspaces, co-location being able to collaborate face to face to a, a light switch flip overnight. And this undefined period of time where all we were living with with was uncertainty, how does spiritual, what do you, when you talk about spiritual co-location in terms of collaboration and processes and technology help us unpack that, and how are you seeing organizations adopted? >>Yeah, it's, it's, um, it's a great question. And, and I think it goes to the very root of how organizations are trying to transform themselves to be more agile and to embrace dev ops. Um, if you go all the way back to the, to the original, uh, agile manifesto, you know, there were four principles that were espoused individuals and interactions over processes and tools. That's still important. Individuals and interactions are at the core of software development, processes and tools that support those individual and interact. Uh, those individuals in those interactions are more important than ever working software over comprehensive documentation. Working software is still more important, but when you are trying to onboard employees and they can't come into the office and they can't do the two day training session and kind of understand how things work and they can't just holler over the cube, uh, to ask a question, you may need to invest a little bit more in documentation to help that onboarding process be successful in a remote context, uh, customer collaboration over contract negotiation. >>Absolutely still important, but employee collaboration is equally as important if you want to be spiritually, spiritually co-located. And if you want to have a shared purpose and then, um, responding to change over following a plan. I think one of the things that's happened in a lot of organizations is we have focused so much of our dev ops effort around velocity getting faster. We need to run as fast as we can like that sprinter. Okay. You know, trying to just power through it as quickly as possible. But as we shift to, to the, to the marathon way of thinking, um, velocity is still important, but agility becomes even more important. So when you have to create an application in three weeks to do track and trace for your employees, agility is more important. Um, and then just flat out velocity. Um, and so changing some of the ways that we think about dev ops practices, um, is, is important to make sure that that agility is there for one thing, you have to defer decisions as far down the chain to the team level as possible. >>So those teams have to be empowered to make decisions because you can't have a program level meeting of six or seven teams and one large hall and say, here's the lay of the land. Here's what we're going to do here are our processes. And here are our guardrails. Those teams have to make decisions much more quickly that developers are actually developing code in smaller chunks of flow. They have to be able to take two hours here or 50 minutes there and do something useful. And so the tools that support us have to become tolerant of the reality of, of, of, of how we're working. So if they work in a way that it allows the team together to take as much autonomy as they can handle, um, to, uh, allow them to communicate in a way that, that, that delivers shared purpose and allows them to adapt and master new technologies, then they're in the zone in their spiritual, they'll get spiritually connected. I hope that makes sense. >>It does. I think we all could use some of that, but, you know, you talked about in the beginning and I've, I've talked to numerous companies during the pandemic on the cube about the productivity, or rather the number of hours of work has gone way up for many roles, you know, and, and, and times that they normally late at night on the weekends. So, but it's a cultural, it's a mind shift to your point about dev ops focused on velocity, sprints, sprints, sprints, and now we have to, so that cultural shift is not an easy one for developers. And even at this folks to flip so quickly, what have you seen in terms of the velocity at which businesses are able to get more of that balance between the velocity, the sprint and the agility? >>I think, I think at the core, this really comes down to management sensitivity. Um, when everybody was in the office, you could kind of see the mental health of development teams by, by watching how they work. You know, you call it management by walking around, right. We can't do that. Managers have to, um, to, to be more aware of what their teams are doing, because they're not going to see that, that developer doing a check-in at 9:00 PM on a Friday, uh, because that's what they had to do, uh, to meet the objectives. And, um, and, and they're going to have to, to, um, to find new ways to measure engagement and also potential burnout. Um, friend of mine once had, uh, had a great metric that he called the parking lot metric. It was helpful as the parking lot at nine. And how full was it at five? >>And that gives you an indication of how engaged your developers are. Um, what's the digital equivalent equivalent to the parking lot metric in the time of COVID it's commit stats, it's commit rates. It's, um, you know, the, uh, the turn rate, uh, that we have in our code. So we have this information, we may not be collecting it, but then the next question becomes, how do we use that information? Do we use that information to say, well, this team isn't delivering as at the same level of productivity as another team, do we weaponize that data or do we use that data to identify impedances in the process? Um, why isn't a team working effectively? Is it because they have higher levels of family obligations and they've got kids that, that are at home? Um, is it because they're working with, um, you know, hardware technology, and guess what, they, it's not easy to get the hardware technology into their home office because it's in the lab at the, uh, at the corporate office, uh, or they're trying to communicate, uh, you know, halfway around the world. >>And, uh, they're communicating with a, with an office lab that is also shut down and, and, and the bandwidth just doesn't enable the, the level of high bandwidth communications. So from a dev ops perspective, managers have to get much more sensitive to the, the exhaust that the dev ops tools are throwing off, but also how they're going to use that in a constructive way to, to prevent burnout. And then they also need to, if they're not already managing or monitoring or measuring the level of developer engagement, they have, they really need to start whether that's surveys around developer satisfaction, um, whether it's, you know, more regular social events, uh, where developers can kind of just get together and drink a beer and talk about what's going on in the project, uh, and monitoring who checks in and who doesn't, uh, they have to, to, um, work harder, I think, than they ever have before. >>Well, and you mentioned burnout, and that's something that I think we've all faced in this time at varying levels and it changes. And it's a real, there's a tension in the air, regardless of where you are. There's a challenge, as you mentioned, people having, you know, coworker, their kids as coworkers and fighting for bandwidth, because everyone is forced in this situation. I'd love to get your perspective on some businesses that are, that have done this well, this adaptation, what can you share in terms of some real-world examples that might inspire the audience? >>Yeah. Uh, I'll start with, uh, stack overflow. Uh, they recently published a piece in the journal of the ACM around some of the things that they had discovered. Um, you know, first of all, just a cultural philosophy. If one person is remote, everybody is remote. And you just think that way from an executive level, um, social spaces. One of the things that they talk about doing is leaving a video conference room open at a team level all day long, and the team members, you know, we'll go on mute, you know, so that they don't have to, that they don't necessarily have to be there with somebody else listening to them. But if they have a question, they can just pop off mute really quickly and ask the question. And if anybody else knows the answer, it's kind of like being in that virtual pod. Uh, if you, uh, if you will, um, even here at Forrester, one of the things that we've done is we've invested in social ceremonies. >>We've actually moved our to our team meetings on, on my analyst team from, from once every two weeks to weekly. And we have built more time in for social Ajay socialization, just so we can see, uh, how, how, how we're doing. Um, I think Microsoft has really made some good, uh, information available in how they've managed things like the onboarding process. I think I'm Amanda silver over there mentioned that a couple of weeks ago when, uh, uh, a presentation they did that, uh, uh, Microsoft onboarded over 150,000 people since the start of COVID, if you don't have good remote onboarding processes, that's going to be a disaster. Now they're not all developers, but if you think about it, um, everything from how you do the interviewing process, uh, to how you get people, their badges, to how they get their equipment. Um, security is a, is another issue that they called out typically, uh, it security, um, the security of, of developers machines ends at, at, at the corporate desktop. >>But, you know, since we're increasingly using our own machines, our own hardware, um, security organizations kind of have to extend their security policies to cover, uh, employee devices, and that's caused them to scramble a little bit. Uh, so, so the examples are out there. It's not a lot of, like, we have to do everything completely differently, but it's a lot of subtle changes that, that have to be made. Um, I'll give you another example. Um, one of the things that, that we are seeing is that, um, more and more organizations to deal with the challenges around agility, with respect to delivering software, embracing low-code tools. In fact, uh, we see about 50% of firms are using low-code tools right now. We predict it's going to be 75% by the end of next year. So figuring out how your dev ops processes support an organization that might be using Mendix or OutSystems, or, you know, the power platform building the front end of an application, like a track and trace application really, really quickly, but then hooking it up to your backend infrastructure. Does that happen completely outside the dev ops investments that you're making and the agile processes that you're making, or do you adapt your organization? Um, our hybrid teams now teams that not just have professional developers, but also have business users that are doing some development with a low-code tool. Those are the kinds of things that we have to be, um, willing to, um, to entertain in order to shift the focus a little bit more toward the agility side, I think >>Lot of obstacles, but also a lot of opportunities for businesses to really learn, pay attention here, pivot and grow, and hopefully some good opportunities for the developers and the business folks to just get better at what they're doing and learning to embrace spiritual co-location Jeffrey, thank you so much for joining us on the program today. Very insightful conversation. >>My pleasure. It's it's, it's an important thing. Just remember if you're going to run that marathon, break it into 26, 10 minute runs, take a walk break in between each and you'll find that you'll get there. >>Digestible components, wise advice. Jeffery Hammond. Thank you so much for joining for Jeffrey I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching Broadcom's dev ops virtual forum >>From around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of dev ops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom, >>Continuing our conversations here at Broadcom's dev ops virtual forum. Lisa Martin here, please. To welcome back to the program, Serge Lucio, the general manager of the enterprise software division at Broadcom. Hey, Serge. Welcome. Thank you. Good to be here. So I know you were just, uh, participating with the biz ops manifesto that just happened recently. I just had the chance to talk with Jeffrey Hammond and he unlocked this really interesting concept, but I wanted to get your thoughts on spiritual co-location as really a necessity for biz ops to succeed in this unusual time in which we're living. What are your thoughts on spiritual colocation in terms of cultural change versus adoption of technologies? >>Yeah, it's a, it's, it's quite interesting, right? When we, when we think about the major impediments for, uh, for dev ops implementation, it's all about culture, right? And swore over the last 20 years, we've been talking about silos. We'd be talking about the paradox for these teams to when it went to align in many ways, it's not so much about these teams aligning, but about being in the same car in the same books, right? It's really about fusing those teams around kind of the common purpose, a common objective. So to me, the, this, this is really about kind of changing this culture where people start to look at a kind of OKR is instead of the key objective, um, that, that drives the entire team. Now, what it means in practice is really that's, uh, we need to change a lot of behaviors, right? It's not about the Yarki, it's not about roles. It's about, you know, who can do what and when, and, uh, you know, driving a bias towards action. It also means that we need, I mean, especially in this school times, it becomes very difficult, right? To drive kind of a kind of collaboration between these teams. And so I think there there's a significant role that especially tools can play in terms of providing this complex feedback from teams to, uh, to be in that preface spiritual qualification. >>Well, and it talked about culture being, it's something that, you know, we're so used to talking about dev ops with respect to velocity, all about speed here. But of course this time everything changed so quickly, but going from the physical spaces to everybody being remote really does take it. It's very different than you can't replicate it digitally, but there are collaboration tools that can kind of really be essential to help that cultural shift. Right? >>Yeah. So 2020, we, we touch to talk about collaboration in a very mundane way. Like, of course we can use zoom. We can all get into, into the same room. But the point when I think when Jeff says spiritual, co-location, it's really about, we all share the same objective. Do we, do we have a niece who, for instance, our pipeline, right? When you talk about dev ops, probably we all started thinking about this continuous delivery pipeline that basically drives the automation, the orchestration across the team, but just thinking about a pipeline, right, at the end of the day, it's all about what is the meantime to beat back to these teams. If I'm a developer and a commit code, I don't, does it take where, you know, that code to be processed through pipeline pushy? Can I get feedback if I am a finance person who is funding a product or a project, what is my meantime to beat back? >>And so a lot of, kind of a, when we think about the pipeline, I think what's been really inspiring to me in the last year or so is that there is much more of an adoption of the Dora metrics. There is way more of a focus around value stream management. And to me, this is really when we talk about collaboration, it's really a balance. How do you provide the feedback to the different stakeholders across the life cycle in a very timely matter? And that's what we would need to get to in terms of kind of this, this notion of collaboration. It's not so much about people being in the same physical space. It's about, you know, when I checked in code, you know, to do I guess the system to automatically identify what I'm going to break. If I'm about to release some allegation, how can the system help me reduce my change pillar rates? Because it's, it's able to predict that some issue was introduced in the outpatient or work product. Um, so I think there's, there's a great role of technology and AI candidate Lynch to, to actually provide that new level of collaboration. >>So we'll get to AI in a second, but I'm curious, what are some of the, of the metrics you think that really matter right now is organizations are still in some form of transformation to this new almost 100% remote workforce. >>So I'll just say first, I'm not a big fan of metrics. Um, and the reason being that, you know, you can look at a change killer rate, right, or a lead time or cycle time. And those are, those are interesting metrics, right? The trend on metric is absolutely critical, but what's more important is you get to the root cause what is taught to you lean to that metric to degrade or improve or time. And so I'm much more interested and we, you know, fruit for Broadcom. Are we more interested in understanding what are the patterns that contribute to this? So I'll give you a very mundane example. You know, we know that cycle time is heavily influenced by, um, organizational boundaries. So, you know, we talk a lot about silos, but, uh, we we've worked with many of our customers doing value stream mapping. And oftentimes what you see is that really the boundaries of your organization creates a lot of idle time, right? So to me, it's less about the metrics. I think the door metrics are a pretty, you know, valid set metrics, but what's way more important is to understand what are the antiperspirants, what are the things that we can detect through the data that actually are affecting those metrics. And, uh, I mean, over the last 10, 20 years, we've learned a lot about kind of what are, what are the antiperspirants within our large enterprise customers. And there are plenty of them. >>What are some of the things that you're seeing now with respect to patterns that have developed over the last seven to eight months? >>So I think the two areas which clearly are evolving very quickly are on kind of the front end of the life cycle, where DevOps is more and more embracing value stream management value stream mapping. Um, and I think what's interesting is that in many ways the product is becoming the new silo. Uh, the notion of a product is very difficult by itself to actually define people are starting to recognize that a value stream is not its own little kind of Island. That in reality, when I define a product, this product, oftentimes as dependencies on our products and that in fact, you're looking at kind of a network of value streams, if you will. So, so even on that, and there is clearly kind of a new sets, if you will, of anti-patterns where products are being defined as a set of OTRs, they have interdependencies and you have have a new set of silos on the operands, uh, the Abra key movement to Israel and the SRE space where, um, I think there is a cultural clash while the dev ops side is very much embracing this notion of OTRs and value stream mapping and Belgium management. >>On the other end, you have the it operations teams. We still think business services, right? For them, they think about configure items, think about infrastructure. And so, you know, it's not uncommon to see, you know, teams where, you know, the operations team is still thinking about hundreds of thousands, tens of thousands of business services. And so the, the, there is there's this boundary where, um, I think, well, SRE is being put in place. And there's lots of thinking about what kind of metrics can be fined. I think, you know, going back to culture, I think there's a lot of cultural evolution that's still required for true operations team. >>And that's a hard thing. Cultural transformation in any industry pandemic or not is a challenging thing. You talked about, uh, AI and automation of minutes ago. How do you think those technologies can be leveraged by DevOps leaders to influence their successes and their ability to collaborate, maybe see eye to eye with the SRS? >>Yeah. Um, so th you're kind of too. So even for myself, as a leader of a, you know, 1500 people organization, there's a number of things I don't see right. On a daily basis. And, um, I think the, the, the, the technologies that we have at our disposal today from the AI are able to mind a lot of data and expose a lot of, uh, issues that's as leaders we may not be aware of. And some of the, some of these are pretty kind of easy to understand, right? We all think we're agile. And yet when you, when you start to understand, for instance, uh, what is the, what is the working progress right to during the sprint? Um, when you start to analyze the data you can detect, for instance, that maybe the teams are over committed, that there is too much work in progress. >>You can start to identify kind of, interdepencies either from a technology, from a people point of view, which were hidden, uh, you can start to understand maybe the change filler rates he's he is dragging. So I believe that there is a, there's a fundamental role to be played by the tools to, to expose again, these anti parents, to, to make these things visible to the teams, to be able to even compare teams. Right. One of the things that's, that's, uh, that's amazing is now we have access to tons of data, not just from a given customer, but across a large number of customers. And so we start to compare all of these teams kind of operate, and what's working, what's not working >>Thoughts on AI and automation as, as a facilitator of spiritual co-location. >>Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. It's um, you know, th there's, uh, the problem we all face is the unknown, right? The, the law city, but volume variety of the data, uh, everyday we don't really necessarily completely appreciate what is the impact of our actions, right? And so, um, AI can really act as a safety net that enables us to, to understand what is the impact of our actions. Um, and so, yeah, in many ways, the ability to be informed in a timely matter to be able to interact with people on the basis of data, um, and collaborate on the data. And the actual matter, I think is, is a, is a very powerful enabler, uh, on, in that respect. I mean, I, I've seen, um, I've seen countless of times that, uh, for instance, at the SRE boundary, um, to basically show that we'll turn the quality attributes, so an incoming release, right. And exposing that to, uh, an operations person and a sorry person, and enabling that collaboration dialogue through data is a very, very powerful tool. >>Do you have any recommendations for how teams can use, you know, the SRE folks, the dev ops says can use AI and automation in the right ways to be successful rather than some ways that aren't going to be nonproductive. >>Yeah. So to me, the th there, there's a part of the question really is when, when we talk about data, there are there different ways you can use data, right? Um, so you can, you can do a lot of an analytics, predictive analytics. So I think there is a, there's a tendency, uh, to look at, let's say a, um, a specific KPI, like a, an availability KPI, or change filler rate, and to basically do a regression analysis and projecting all these things, going to happen in the future. To me, that that's, that's a, that's a bad approach. The reason why I fundamentally think it's a better approach is because we are systems. The way we develop software is, is a, is a non-leader kind of system, right? Software development is not linear nature. And so I think there's a D this is probably the worst approach is to actually focus on metrics on the other end. >>Um, if you, if you start to actually understand at a more granular level, what har, uh, which are the things which are contributing to this, right? So if you start to understand, for instance, that whenever maybe, you know, you affect a specific part of the application that translates into production issues. So we, we have, I've actually, uh, a customer who, uh, identified that, uh, over 50% of their unplanned outages were related to specific components in your architecture. And whenever these components were changed, this resulted in these plant outages. So if you start to be able to basically establish causality, right, cause an effect between kind of data across the last cycle. I think, I think this is the right way to, uh, to, to use AI. And so pharma to be, I think it's way more God could have a classification problem. What are the classes of problems that do exist and affect things as opposed to analytics, predictive, which I don't think is as powerful. >>So I mentioned in the beginning of our conversation, that just came off the biz ops manifesto. You're one of the authors of that. I want to get your thoughts on dev ops and biz ops overlapping, complimenting each other, what, from a, the biz ops perspective, what does it mean to the future of dev ops? >>Yeah, so, so it's interesting, right? If you think about DevOps, um, there's no felony document, right? Can we, we can refer to the Phoenix project. I mean, there are a set of documents which have been written, but in many ways, there's no clear definition of what dev ops is. Uh, if you go to the dev ops Institute today, you'll see that they are specific, um, trainings for instance, on value management on SRE. And so in many ways, the problem we have as an industry is that, um, there are set practices between agile dev ops, SRE Valley should management. I told, right. And we all basically talk about the same things, right. We all talk about essentially, um, accelerating in the meantime fee to feedback, but yet we don't have the common framework to talk about that. The other key thing is that we add to wait, uh, for, uh, for jeans, Jean Kim's Lascaux, um, to, uh, to really start to get into the business aspect, right? >>And for value stream mapping to start to emerge for us to start as an industry, right. It, to start to think about what is our connection with the business aspect, what's our purpose, right? And ultimately it's all about driving these business outcomes. And so to me, these ops is really about kind of, uh, putting a lens on this critical element that it's not business and it, that we in fact need to fuse business 19 that I need needs to transform itself to recognize that it's, it's this value generator, right. It's not a cost center. And so the relationship to me, it's more than BizOps provides kind of this Oliver or kind of framework, if you will. That set the context for what is the reason, uh, for it to exist. What's part of the core values and principles that it needs to embrace to, again, change from a cost center to a value center. And then we need to start to use this as a way to start to unify some of the, again, the core practices, whether it's agile, DevOps value, stream mapping SRE. Um, so, so I think over time, my hope is that we start to optimize a lot of our practices, language, um, and, uh, and cultural elements. >>Last question surgeon, the last few seconds we have here talking about this, the relation between biz ops and dev ops, um, what do you think as DevOps evolves? And as you talked to circle some of your insights, what should our audience keep their eyes on in the next six to 12 months? >>So to me, the key, the key, um, challenge for, for the industry is really around. So we were seeing a very rapid shift towards kind of, uh, product to product, right. Which we don't want to do is to recreate kind of these new silos, these hard silos. Um, so that, that's one of the big changes, uh, that I think we need to be, uh, to be really careful about, um, because it is ultimately, it is about culture. It's not about, uh, it's not about, um, kind of how we segment the work, right. And, uh, any true culture that we can overcome kind of silos. So back to, I guess, with Jeffrey's concept of, um, kind of the spiritual co-location, I think it's, it's really about that too. It's really about kind of, uh, uh, focusing on the business outcomes on kind of aligning on driving engagement across the teams, but, but not for create a, kind of a new set of silos, which instead of being vertical are going to be these horizontal products >>Crazy by surge that looking at culture as kind of a way of really, uh, uh, addressing and helping to, uh, re re reduce, replace challenges. We thank you so much for sharing your insights and your time at today's DevOps virtual forum. >>Thank you. Thanks for your time. >>I'll be right back >>From around the globe it's the cube with digital coverage of devops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom. >>Welcome to Broadcom's DevOps virtual forum, I'm Lisa Martin, and I'm joined by another Martin, very socially distanced from me all the way coming from Birmingham, England is Glynn Martin, the head of QA transformation at BT. Glynn, it's great to have you on the program. Thank you, Lisa. I'm looking forward to it. As we said before, we went live to Martins for the person one in one segment. So this is going to be an interesting segment guys, what we're going to do is Glynn's going to give us a really kind of deep inside out view of devops from an evolution perspective. So Glynn, let's start. Transformation is at the heart of what you do. It's obviously been a very transformative year. How have the events of this year affected the >> transformation that you are still responsible for driving? Yeah. Thank you, Lisa. I mean, yeah, it has been a difficult year. >>Um, and although working for BT, which is a global telecommunications company, um, I'm relatively resilient, I suppose, as a, an industry, um, through COVID obviously still has been affected and has got its challenges. And if anything, it's actually caused us to accelerate our transformation journey. Um, you know, we had to do some great things during this time around, um, you know, in the UK for our emergency and, um, health workers give them unlimited data and for vulnerable people to support them. And that's spent that we've had to deliver changes quickly. Um, but what we want to be able to do is deliver those kinds of changes quickly, but sustainably for everything that we do, not just because there's an emergency. Um, so we were already on the kind of journey to agile, but ever more important now that we are, we are able to do those, that kind of work, do it more quickly. >>Um, and that it works because the, the implications of it not working is, can be terrible in terms of you know, we've been supporting testing centers,  new hospitals to treat COVID patients. So we need to get it right. And then therefore the coverage of what we do, the quality of what we do and how quickly we do it really has taken on a new scale and what was already a very competitive market within the telco industry within the UK. Um, you know, what I would say is that, you know, we are under pressure to deliver more value, but we have small cost challenges. We have to obviously, um, deal with the fact that, you know, COVID 19 has hit most industries kind of revenues and profits. So we've got this kind of paradox between having less costs, but having to deliver more value quicker and  to higher quality. So yeah, certainly the finances is, um, on our minds and that's why we need flexible models, cost models that allow us to kind of do growth, but we get that growth by showing that we're delivering value. Um, especially in these times when there are financial challenges on companies. So one of the things that I want to ask you about, I'm again, looking at DevOps from the inside >>Out and the evolution that you've seen, you talked about the speed of things really accelerating in this last nine months or so. When we think dev ops, we think speed. But one of the things I'd love to get your perspective on is we've talked about in a number of the segments that we've done for this event is cultural change. What are some of the things that you've seen there as, as needing to get, as you said, get things right, but done so quickly to support essential businesses, essential workers. How have you seen that cultural shift? >>Yeah, I think, you know, before test teams for themselves at this part of the software delivery cycle, um, and actually now really our customers are expecting that quality and to deliver for our customers what they want, quality has to be ingrained throughout the life cycle. Obviously, you know, there's lots of buzzwords like shift left. Um, how do we do shift left testing? Um, but for me, that's really instilling quality and given capabilities shared capabilities throughout the life cycle that drive automation, drive improvements. I always say that, you know, you're only as good as your lowest common denominator. And one thing that we were finding on our dev ops journey was that we  would be trying to do certain things quick, we had automated build, automated tests. But if we were taking a weeks to create test scripts, or we were taking weeks to manually craft data, and even then when we had taken so long to do it, that the coverage was quite poor and that led to lots of defects later on in the life cycle, or even in our production environment, we just couldn't afford to do that. >>And actually, focusing on continuous testing over the last nine to 12 months has really given us the ability to deliver quickly across the whole life cycle. And therefore actually go from doing a kind of semi agile kind of thing, where we did the user stories, we did a few of the kind of agile ceremonies, but we weren't really deploying any quicker into production because our stakeholders were scared that we didn't have the same control that we had when we had more waterfall releases. And, you know, when we didn't think of ourselves. So we've done a lot of work on every aspect, um, especially from a testing point of view, every aspect of every activity, rather than just looking at automated tests, you know, whether it is actually creating the test in the first place, whether it's doing security testing earlier in the lot and performance testing in the life cycle, et cetera. So, yeah,  it's been a real key thing that for CT, for us to drive DevOps, >>Talk to me a little bit about your team. What are some of the shifts in terms of expectations that you're experiencing and how your team interacts with the internal folks from pipeline through life cycle? >>Yeah, we've done a lot of work on this. Um, you know, there's a thing that I think people will probably call it a customer experience gap, and it reminds me of a Gilbert cartoon, where we start with the requirements here and you're almost like a Chinese whisper effects and what we deliver is completely different. So we think the testing team or the delivery teams, um, know in our teeth has done a great job. This is what it said in the acceptance criteria, but then our customers are saying, well, actually that's not working this isn't working and there's this kind of gap. Um, we had a great launch this year of agile requirements, it's one of the Broadcom tools. And that was the first time in, ever since I remember actually working within BT, I had customers saying to me, wow, you know, we want more of this. >>We want more projects to have extra requirements design on it because it allowed us to actually work with the business collaboratively. I mean, we talk about collaboration, but how do we actually, you know, do that and have something that both the business and technical people can understand. And we've actually been working with the business , using agile requirements designer to really look at what the requirements are, tease out requirements we hadn't even thought of and making sure that we've got high levels of test coverage. And what we actually deliver at the end of it, not only have we been able to generate tests more quickly, but we've got much higher test coverage and also can more smartly, using the kind of AI within the tool and then some of the other kinds of pipeline tools, actually deliver to choose the right tasks, and actually doing a risk based testing approach. So that's been a great launch this year, but just the start of many kinds of things that we're doing >>Well, what I hear in that, Glynn is a lot of positives that have come out of a very challenging situation. Talk to me about it. And I liked that perspective. This is a very challenging time for everybody in the world, but it sounds like from a collaboration perspective you're right, we talk about that a lot critical with devops. But those challenges there, you guys were able to overcome those pretty quickly. What other challenges did you face and figure out quickly enough to be able to pivot so fast? >>I mean, you talked about culture. You know, BT is like most companies  So it's very siloed. You know we're still trying to work to become closer as a company. So I think there's a lot of challenges around how would you integrate with other tools? How would you integrate with the various different technologies. And BT, we have 58 different IT stacks. That's not systems, that's stacks, all of those stacks can have hundreds of systems. And we're trying to, we've got a drive at the moment, a simplified program where we're trying to you know, reduce that number to 14 stacks. And even then there'll be complexity behind the scenes that we will be challenged more and more as we go forward. How do we actually highlight that to our users? And as an it organization, how do we make ourselves leaner, so that even when we've still got some of that legacy, and we'll never fully get rid of it and that's the kind of trade off that we have to make, how do we actually deal with that and hide that from our users and drive those programs, so we can, as I say, accelerate change,  reduce that kind of waste and that kind of legacy costs out of our business. You know, the other thing as well, I'm sure telecoms is probably no different to insurance or finance. When you take the number of products that we do, and then you combine them, the permutations are tens and hundreds of thousands of products. So we, as a business are trying to simplify, we are trying to do that in an agile way. >>And haven't tried to do agile in the proper way and really actually work at pace, really deliver value. So I think what we're looking more and more at the moment is actually  more value focused. Before we used to deliver changes sometimes into production. Someone had a great idea, or it was a great idea nine months ago or 12 months ago, but actually then we ended up deploying it and then we'd look at the users, the usage of that product or that application or whatever it is, and it's not being used for six months. So we haven't got, you know, the cost of the last 12 months. We certainly haven't gotten room for that kind of waste and, you know, for not really understanding the value of changes that we are doing. So I think that's the most important thing of the moment, it's really taking that waste out. You know, there's lots of focus on things like flow management, what bits of our process are actually taking too long. And we've started on that journey, but we've got a hell of a long way to go. But that involves looking at every aspect of the software delivery cycle. >> Going from, what 58 IT stacks down to 14 or whatever it's going to be, simplifying sounds magical to everybody. It's a big challenge. What are some of the core technology capabilities that you see really as kind of essential for enabling that with this new way that you're working? >>Yeah. I mean, I think we were started on a continuous testing journey, and I think that's just the start. I mean as I say, looking at every aspect of, you know, from a QA point of view is every aspect of what we do. And it's also looking at, you know, we've started to branch into more like AI, uh, AI ops and, you know, really the full life cycle. Um, and you know, that's just a stepping stone to, you know, I think autonomics is the way forward, right. You know, all of this kind of stuff that happens, um, you know, monitoring, uh, you know, watching the systems what's happening in production, how do we feed that back? How'd you get to a point where actually we think about change and then suddenly it's in production safely, or if it's not going to safety, it's automatically backing out. So, you know, it's a very, very long journey, but if we want to, you know, in a world where the pace is in ever-increasing and the demands for the team, and, you know, with the pressures on, at the moment where we're being asked to do things, uh, you know, more efficiently and as lean as possible, we need to be thinking about every part of the process and how we put the kind of stepping stones in place to lead us to a more automated kind of, um, you know, um, the future. >>Do you feel that that planned outcomes are starting to align with what's delivered, given this massive shift that you're experiencing? >>I think it's starting to, and I think, you know, as I say, as we look at more of a value based approach, um, and, um, you know, as I say, print, this was a kind of flow management. I think that that will become ever, uh, ever more important. So, um, I think it starting to people certainly realize that, you know, teams need to work together, you know, the kind of the cousin between business and it, especially as we go to more kind of SAS based solutions, low code solutions, you know, there's not such a gap anymore, actually, some of our business partners that expense to be much more tech savvy. Um, so I think, you know, this is what we have to kind of appreciate what is its role, how do we give the capabilities, um, become more of a centers of excellence rather than actually doing mounds amounts of work. And for me, and from a testing point of view, you know, mounds and mounds of testing, actually, how do we automate that? How do we actually generate that instead of, um, create it? I think that's the kind of challenge going forward. >>What are some, as we look forward, what are some of the things that you would like to see implemented or deployed in the next, say six to 12 months as we hopefully round a corner with this pandemic? >>Yeah, I think, um, you know, certainly for, for where we are as a company from a QA perspective, we are, um, you let's start in bits that we do well, you know, we've started creating, um, continuous delivery and DevOps pipelines. Um, there's still manual aspects of that. So, you know, certainly for me, I I've challenged my team with saying how do we do an automated journey? So if I put a requirement in JIRA or rally or wherever it is and why then click a button and, you know, with either zero touch for one such, then put that into production and have confidence that, that has been done safely and that it works and what happens if it doesn't work. So, you know, that's, that's the next, um, the next few months, that's what our concentration, um, is, is about. But it's also about decision-making, you know, how do you actually understand those value judgments? >>And I think there's lots of the things dev ops, AI ops, kind of that always ask aspects of business operations. I think it's about having the information in one place to make those kinds of decisions. How does it all try and tie it together? As I say, even still with kind of dev ops, we've still got elements within my company where we've got lots of different organizations doing some, doing similar kinds of things, but they're all kind of working in silos. So I think having AI ops as it comes more and more to the fore as we go to cloud, and that's what we need to, you know, we're still very early on in our cloud journey, you know, so we need to make sure the technologies work with cloud as well as you can have, um, legacy systems, but it's about bringing that all together and having a full, visible pipeline, um, that everybody can see and make decisions. >>You said the word confidence, which jumped out at me right away, because absolutely you've got to have be able to have confidence in what your team is delivering and how it's impacting the business and those customers. Last question then for you is how would you advise your peers in a similar situation to leverage technology automation, for example, dev ops, to be able to gain the confidence that they're making the right decisions for their business? >>I think the, the, the, the, the approach that we've taken actually is not started with technology. Um, we've actually taken a human centered design, uh, as a core principle of what we do, um, within the it part of BT. So by using human centered design, that means we talk to our customers, we understand their pain points, we map out their current processes. Um, and then when we mapped out what this process does, it also understand their aspirations as well, you know? Um, and where do they want to be in six months? You know, do they want it to be, um, more agile and, you know, or do they want to, you know, is, is this a part of their business that they want to do one better? We actually then looked at why that's not running well, and then see what, what solutions are out there. >>We've been lucky that, you know, with our partnership, with Broadcom within the payer line, lots of the tools and the PLA have directly answered some of the business's problems. But I think by having those conversations and actually engaging with the business, um, you know, especially if the business hold the purse strings, which in, in, uh, you know, in some companies include not as they do there is that kind of, you know, almost by understanding their, their pain points and then starting, this is how we can solve your problem. Um, is we've, we've tended to be much more successful than trying to impose something and say, well, here's the technology that they don't quite understand. It doesn't really understand how it kind of resonates with their problems. So I think that's the heart of it. It's really about, you know, getting, looking at the data, looking at the processes, looking at where the kind of waste is. >>And then actually then looking at the right solutions. Then, as I say, continuous testing is massive for us. We've also got a good relationship with Apple towards looking at visual AI. And actually there's a common theme through that. And I mean, AI is becoming more and more prevalent. And I know, you know, sometimes what is AI and people have kind of this semantics of, is it true AI or not, but it's certainly, you know, AI machine learning is becoming more and more prevalent in the way that we work. And it's allowing us to be much more effective, be quicker in what we do and be more accurate. And, you know, whether it's finding defects running the right tests or, um, you know, being able to anticipate problems before they're happening in a production environment. >>Well, thank you so much for giving us this sort of insight outlook at dev ops sharing the successes that you're having, taking those challenges, converting them to opportunities and forgiving folks who might be in your shoes, or maybe slightly behind advice enter. They appreciate it. We appreciate your time. >>Well, it's been an absolute pleasure, really. Thank you for inviting me. I have a extremely enjoyed it. So thank you ever so much. >>Excellent. Me too. I've learned a lot for Glenn Martin. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the cube >>Driving revenue today means getting better, more valuable software features into the hands of your customers. If you don't do it quickly, your competitors as well, but going faster without quality creates risks that can damage your brand destroy customer loyalty and cost millions to fix dev ops from Broadcom is a complete solution for balancing speed and risk, allowing you to accelerate the flow of value while minimizing the risk and severity of critical issues with Broadcom quality becomes integrated across the entire DevOps pipeline from planning to production, actionable insights, including our unique readiness score, provide a three 60 degree view of software quality giving you visibility into potential issues before they become disasters. Dev ops leaders can manage these risks with tools like Canary deployments tested on a small subset of users, or immediately roll back to limit the impact of defects for subsequent cycles. Dev ops from Broadcom makes innovation improvement easier with integrated planning and continuous testing tools that accelerate the flow of value product requirements are used to automatically generate tests to ensure complete quality coverage and tests are easily updated. >>As requirements change developers can perform unit testing without ever leaving their preferred environment, improving efficiency and productivity for the ultimate in shift left testing the platform also integrates virtual services and test data on demand. Eliminating two common roadblocks to fast and complete continuous testing. When software is ready for the CIC CD pipeline, only DevOps from Broadcom uses AI to prioritize the most critical and relevant tests dramatically improving feedback speed with no decrease in quality. This release is ready to go wherever you are in your DevOps journey. Broadcom helps maximize innovation velocity while managing risk. So you can deploy ideas into production faster and release with more confidence from around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of dev ops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom. >>Hi guys. Welcome back. So we have discussed the current state and the near future state of dev ops and how it's going to evolve from three unique perspectives. In this last segment, we're going to open up the floor and see if we can come to a shared understanding of where dev ops needs to go in order to be successful next year. So our guests today are, you've seen them all before Jeffrey Hammond is here. The VP and principal analyst serving CIO is at Forester. We've also Serge Lucio, the GM of Broadcom's enterprise software division and Glenn Martin, the head of QA transformation at BT guys. Welcome back. Great to have you all three together >>To be here. >>All right. So we're very, we're all very socially distanced as we've talked about before. Great to have this conversation. So let's, let's start with one of the topics that we kicked off the forum with Jeff. We're going to start with you spiritual co-location that's a really interesting topic that we've we've uncovered, but how much of the challenge is truly cultural and what can we solve through technology? Jeff, we'll start with you then search then Glen Jeff, take it away. >>Yeah, I think fundamentally you can have all the technology in the world and if you don't make the right investments in the cultural practices in your development organization, you still won't be effective. Um, almost 10 years ago, I wrote a piece, um, where I did a bunch of research around what made high-performance teams, software delivery teams, high performance. And one of the things that came out as part of that was that these teams have a high level of autonomy. And that's one of the things that you see coming out of the agile manifesto. Let's take that to today where developers are on their own in their own offices. If you've got teams where the team itself had a high level of autonomy, um, and they know how to work, they can make decisions. They can move forward. They're not waiting for management to tell them what to do. >>And so what we have seen is that organizations that embraced autonomy, uh, and got their teams in the right place and their teams had the information that they needed to make the right decisions have actually been able to operate pretty well, even as they've been remote. And it's turned out to be things like, well, how do we actually push the software that we've created into production that would become the challenge is not, are we writing the right software? And that's why I think the term spiritual co-location is so important because even though we may be physically distant, we're on the same plane, we're connected from a, from, from a, a shared purpose. Um, you know, surgeon, I worked together a long, long time ago. So it's been what almost 15, 16 years since we were at the same place. And yet I would say there's probably still a certain level of spiritual co-location between us, uh, because of the shared purposes that we've had in the past and what we've seen in the industry. And that's a really powerful tool, uh, to build on. So what do tools play as part of that, to the extent that tools make information available, to build shared purpose on to the extent that they enable communication so that we can build that spiritual co-location to the extent that they reinforce the culture that we want to put in place, they can be incredibly valuable, especially when, when we don't have the luxury of physical locate physical co-location. Okay. That makes sense. >>It does. I shouldn't have introduced us. This last segment is we're all spiritually co-located or it's a surge, clearly you're still spiritually co located with jump. Talk to me about what your thoughts are about spiritual of co-location the cultural impact and how technology can move it forward. >>Yeah. So I think, well, I'm going to sound very similar to Jeff in that respect. I think, you know, it starts with kind of a shared purpose and the other understanding, Oh, individuals teams, uh, contributed to kind of a business outcome, what is our shared goal or shared vision? What's what is it we're trying to achieve collectively and keeping it kind of aligned to that? Um, and so, so it's really starts with that now, now the big challenge, always these over the last 20 years, especially in large organization, there's been specialization of roles and functions. And so we, we all that started to basically measure which we do, uh, on a daily basis using metrics, which oftentimes are completely disconnected from kind of a business outcome or purpose. We, we kind of reverted back to, okay, what is my database all the time? What is my cycle time? >>Right. And, and I think, you know, which we can do or where we really should be focused as an industry is to start to basically provide a lens or these different stakeholders to look at what they're doing in the context of kind of these business outcomes. So, um, you know, probably one of my, um, favorites experience was to actually weakness at one of a large financial institution. Um, you know, Tuesday Golder's unquote development and operations staring at the same data, right. Which was related to, you know, in calming changes, um, test execution results, you know, Coverity coverage, um, official liabilities and all the all ran. It could have a direction level links. And that's when you start to put these things in context and represent that to you in a way that these different stakeholders can, can look at from their different lens. And, uh, and it can start to basically communicate and, and understand have they joined our company to, uh, to, to that kind of common view or objective. >>And Glen, we talked a lot about transformation with you last time. What are your thoughts on spiritual colocation and the cultural part, the technology impact? >>Yeah, I mean, I agree with Jeffrey that, you know, um, the people and culture, the most important thing, actually, that's why it's really important when you're transforming to have partners who have the same vision as you, um, who, who you can work with, have the same end goal in mind. And w I've certainly found that with our, um, you know, continuing relationship with Broadcom, what it also does though, is although, you know, tools can accelerate what you're doing and can join consistency. You know, we've seen within simplify, which is BTS flagship transformation program, where we're trying to, as it can, it says simplify the number of systems stacks that we have, the number of products that we have actually at the moment, we've got different value streams within that program who have got organizational silos. We were trying to rewrite, rewrite the wheel, um, who are still doing things manually. >>So in order to try and bring that consistency, we need the right tools that actually are at an enterprise grade, which can be flexible to work with in BT, which is such a complex and very dev, uh, different environments, depending on what area of BT you're in, whether it's a consumer, whether it's a mobile area, whether it's large global or government organizations, you know, we found that we need tools that can, um, drive that consistency, but also flex to Greenfield brownfield kind of technologies as well. So it's really important that as I say, for a number of different aspects, that you have the right partner, um, to drive the right culture, I've got the same vision, but also who have the tool sets to help you accelerate. They can't do that on their own, but they can help accelerate what it is you're trying to do in it. >>And a really good example of that is we're trying to shift left, which is probably a, quite a bit of a buzz phrase in their kind of testing world at the moment. But, you know, I could talk about things like continuous delivery direct to when a ball comes tools and it has many different features to it, but very simply on its own, it allows us to give the visibility of what the teams are doing. And once we have that visibility, then we can talk to the teams, um, around, you know, could they be doing better component testing? Could they be using some virtualized services here or there? And that's not even the main purpose of continuous delivery director, but it's just a reason that tools themselves can just give greater visibility of have much more intuitive and insightful conversations with other teams and reduce those organizational silos. >>Thanks, Ben. So we'd kind of sum it up, autonomy collaboration tools that facilitate that. So let's talk now about metrics from your perspectives. What are the metrics that matter? Jeff, >>I'm going to go right back to what Glenn said about data that provides visibility that enables us to, to make decisions, um, with shared purpose. And so business value has to be one of the first things that we look at. Um, how do we assess whether we have built something that is valuable, you know, that could be sales revenue, it could be net promoter score. Uh, if you're not selling what you've built, it could even be what the level of reuse is within your organization or other teams picking up the services, uh, that you've created. Um, one of the things that I've begun to see organizations do is to align value streams with customer journeys and then to align teams with those value streams. So that's one of the ways that you get to a shared purpose, cause we're all trying to deliver around that customer journey, the value with it. >>And we're all measured on that. Um, there are flow metrics which are really important. How long does it take us to get a new feature out from the time that we conceive it to the time that we can run our first experiments with it? There are quality metrics, um, you know, some of the classics or maybe things like defect, density, or meantime to response. Um, one of my favorites came from a, um, a company called ultimate software where they looked at the ratio of defects found in production to defects found in pre production and their developers were in fact measured on that ratio. It told them that guess what quality is your job to not just the test, uh, departments, a group, the fourth level that I think is really important, uh, in, in the current, uh, situation that we're in is the level of engagement in your development organization. >>We used to joke that we measured this with the parking lot metric helpful was the parking lot at nine. And how full was it at five o'clock. I can't do that anymore since we're not physically co-located, but what you can do is you can look at how folks are delivering. You can look at your metrics in your SCM environment. You can look at, uh, the relative rates of churn. Uh, you can look at things like, well, are our developers delivering, uh, during longer periods earlier in the morning, later in the evening, are they delivering, uh, you know, on the weekends as well? Are those signs that we might be heading toward a burnout because folks are still running at sprint levels instead of marathon levels. Uh, so all of those in combination, uh, business value, uh, flow engagement in quality, I think form the backbone of any sort of, of metrics, uh, a program. >>The second thing that I think you need to look at is what are we going to do with the data and the philosophy behind the data is critical. Um, unfortunately I see organizations where they weaponize the data and that's completely the wrong way to look at it. What you need to do is you need to say, you need to say, how is this data helping us to identify the blockers? The things that aren't allowing us to provide the right context for people to do the right thing. And then what do we do to remove those blockers, uh, to make sure that we're giving these autonomous teams the context that they need to do their job, uh, in a way that creates the most value for the customers. >>Great advice stuff, Glenn, over to your metrics that matter to you that really make a big impact. And, and, and also how do you measure quality kind of following onto the advice that Jeff provided? >>That's some great advice. Actually, he talks about value. He talks about flow. Both of those things are very much on my mind at the moment. Um, but there was this, I listened to a speaker, uh, called me Kirsten a couple of months ago. It taught very much around how important flow management is and removing, you know, and using that to remove waste, to understand in terms of, you know, making software changes, um, what is it that's causing us to do it longer than we need to. So where are those areas where it takes long? So I think that's a very important thing for us. It's even more basic than that at the moment, we're on a journey from moving from kind of a waterfall to agile. Um, and the problem with moving from waterfall to agile is with waterfall, the, the business had a kind of comfort that, you know, everything was tested together and therefore it's safer. >>Um, and with agile, there's that kind of, you know, how do we make sure that, you know, if we're doing things quick and we're getting stuff out the door that we give that confidence, um, that that's ready to go, or if there's a risk that we're able to truly articulate what that risk is. So there's a bit about release confidence, um, and some of the metrics around that and how, how healthy those releases are, and actually saying, you know, we spend a lot of money, um, um, an investment setting up our teams, training our teams, are we actually seeing them deliver more quickly and are we actually seeing them deliver more value quickly? So yeah, those are the two main things for me at the moment, but I think it's also about, you know, generally bringing it all together, the dev ops, you know, we've got the kind of value ops AI ops, how do we actually bring that together to so we can make quick decisions and making sure that we are, um, delivering the biggest bang for our buck, absolutely biggest bang for the buck, surge, your thoughts. >>Yeah. So I think we all agree, right? It starts with business metrics, flow metrics. Um, these are kind of the most important metrics. And ultimately, I mean, one of the things that's very common across a highly functional teams is engagements, right? When, when you see a team that's highly functioning, that's agile, that practices DevOps every day, they are highly engaged. Um, that that's, that's definitely true. Now the, you know, back to, I think, uh, Jeff's point on weaponization of metrics. One of the key challenges we see is that, um, organizations traditionally have been kind of, uh, you know, setting up benchmarks, right? So what is a good cycle time? What is a good lead time? What is a good meantime to repair? The, the problem is that this is very contextual, right? It varies. It's going to vary quite a bit, depending on the nature of application and system. >>And so one of the things that we really need to evolve, um, as an industry is to understand that it's not so much about those flow metrics is about our, these four metrics ultimately contribute to the business metric to the business outcome. So that's one thing. The second aspect, I think that's oftentimes misunderstood is that, you know, when you have a bad cycle time or, or, or what you perceive as being a buy cycle time or better quality, the problem is oftentimes like all, do you go and explore why, right. What is the root cause of this? And I think one of the key challenges is that we tend to focus a lot of time on metrics and not on the eye type patterns, which are pretty common across the industry. Um, you know, if you look at, for instance, things like lead time, for instance, it's very common that, uh, organizational boundaries are going to be a key contributor to badly time. >>And so I think that there is, you know, the only the metrics there is, I think a lot of work that we need to do in terms of classifying, descend type patterns, um, you know, back to you, Jeff, I think you're one of the cool offers of waterscrumfall as a, as, as a key pattern, the industry or anti-spatter. Um, but waterscrumfall right is a key one, right? And you will detect that through kind of a defect arrival rates. That's where that looks like an S-curve. And so I think it's beyond kind of the, the metrics is what do you do with those metrics? >>Right? I'll tell you a search. One of the things that is really interesting to me in that space is I think those of us had been in industry for a long time. We know the anti-patterns cause we've seen them in our career maybe in multiple times. And one of the things that I think you could see tooling do is perhaps provide some notification of anti-patterns based on the telemetry that comes in. I think it would be a really interesting place to apply, uh, machine learning and reinforcement learning techniques. Um, so hopefully something that we'd see in the future with dev ops tools, because, you know, as a manager that, that, you know, may be only a 10 year veteran or 15 year veteran, you may be seeing these anti-patterns for the first time. And it would sure be nice to know what to do, uh, when they start to pop up, >>That would right. Insight, always helpful. All right, guys, I would like to get your final thoughts on this. The one thing that you believe our audience really needs to be on the lookout for and to put on our agendas for the next 12 months, Jeff will go back to you. Okay. >>I would say look for the opportunities that this disruption presents. And there are a couple that I see, first of all, uh, as we shift to remote central working, uh, we're unlocking new pools of talent, uh, we're, it's possible to implement, uh, more geographic diversity. So, so look to that as part of your strategy. Number two, look for new types of tools. We've seen a lot of interest in usage of low-code tools to very quickly develop applications. That's potentially part of a mainstream strategy as we go into 2021. Finally, make sure that you embrace this idea that you are supporting creative workers that agile and dev ops are the peanut butter and chocolate to support creative, uh, workers with algorithmic capabilities, >>Peanut butter and chocolate Glen, where do we go from there? What are, what's the one silver bullet that you think folks to be on the lookout for now? I, I certainly agree that, um, low, low code is, uh, next year. We'll see much more low code we'd already started going, moving towards a more of a SAS based world, but low code also. Um, I think as well for me, um, we've still got one foot in the kind of cow camp. Um, you know, we'll be fully trying to explore what that means going into the next year and exploiting the capabilities of cloud. But I think the last, um, the last thing for me is how do you really instill quality throughout the kind of, um, the, the life cycle, um, where, when I heard the word scrum fall, it kind of made me shut it because I know that's a problem. That's where we're at with some of our things at the moment we need to get beyond that. We need >>To be releasing, um, changes more frequently into production and actually being a bit more brave and having the confidence to actually do more testing in production and go straight to production itself. So expect to see much more of that next year. Um, yeah. Thank you. I haven't got any food analogies. Unfortunately we all need some peanut butter and chocolate. All right. It starts to take us home. That's what's that nugget you think everyone needs to have on their agendas? >>That's interesting. Right. So a couple of days ago we had kind of a latest state of the DevOps report, right? And if you read through the report, it's all about the lost city, but it's all about sweet. We still are receiving DevOps as being all about speed. And so to me, the key advice is in order to create kind of a spiritual collocation in order to foster engagement, we have to go back to what is it we're trying to do collectively. We have to go back to tie everything to the business outcome. And so for me, it's absolutely imperative for organizations to start to plot their value streams, to understand how they're delivering value into aligning everything they do from a metrics to deliver it, to flow to those metrics. And only with that, I think, are we going to be able to actually start to really start to align kind of all these roles across the organizations and drive, not just speed, but business outcomes, >>All about business outcomes. I think you guys, the three of you could write a book together. So I'll give you that as food for thought. Thank you all so much for joining me today and our guests. I think this was an incredibly valuable fruitful conversation, and we appreciate all of you taking the time to spiritually co-located with us today, guys. Thank you. Thank you, Lisa. Thank you. Thank you for Jeff Hammond serves Lucio and Glen Martin. I'm Lisa Martin. Thank you for watching the broad cops Broadcom dev ops virtual forum.

Published Date : Nov 18 2020

SUMMARY :

of dev ops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom. Nice to talk with you today. It's good to be here. One of the things that we think of is speed, it was essentially a sprint, you know, you run as hard as you can for as fast as you can And it's almost like, you know, if you've ever run a marathon the first mile or two in the marathon, um, we have to think about all the activities that you need to do from a dev ops perspective and to hiring, you know, achieve higher levels of digitization in our processes and We've said that the key to success with agile at the team level is cross-functional organizations, as you say, going from, you know, physical workspaces, uh, agile manifesto, you know, there were four principles that were espoused individuals and interactions is important to make sure that that agility is there for one thing, you have to defer decisions So those teams have to be empowered to make decisions because you can't have a I think we all could use some of that, but, you know, you talked about in the beginning and I've, Um, when everybody was in the office, you could kind of see the And that gives you an indication of how engaged your developers are. um, whether it's, you know, more regular social events, that have done this well, this adaptation, what can you share in terms of some real-world examples that might Um, you know, first of all, since the start of COVID, if you don't have good remote onboarding processes, Those are the kinds of things that we have to be, um, willing to, um, and the business folks to just get better at what they're doing and learning to embrace It's it's, it's an important thing. Thank you so much for joining for Jeffrey I'm Lisa Martin, of dev ops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom, I just had the chance to talk with Jeffrey Hammond and he unlocked this really interesting concept, uh, you know, driving a bias towards action. Well, and it talked about culture being, it's something that, you know, we're so used to talking about dev ops with respect does it take where, you know, that code to be processed through pipeline pushy? you know, when I checked in code, you know, to do I guess the system to automatically identify what So we'll get to AI in a second, but I'm curious, what are some of the, of the metrics you think that really matter right And so I'm much more interested and we, you know, fruit for Broadcom. are being defined as a set of OTRs, they have interdependencies and you have have a new set And so, you know, it's not uncommon to see, you know, teams where, you know, How do you think those technologies can be leveraged by DevOps leaders to influence as a leader of a, you know, 1500 people organization, there's a number of from a people point of view, which were hidden, uh, you can start to understand maybe It's um, you know, you know, the SRE folks, the dev ops says can use AI and automation in the right ways Um, so you can, you can do a lot of an analytics, predictive analytics. So if you start to understand, for instance, that whenever maybe, you know, So I mentioned in the beginning of our conversation, that just came off the biz ops manifesto. the problem we have as an industry is that, um, there are set practices between And so to me, these ops is really about kind of, uh, putting a lens on So to me, the key, the key, um, challenge for, We thank you so much for sharing your insights and your time at today's DevOps Thanks for your time. of devops virtual forum brought to you by Broadcom. Transformation is at the heart of what you do. transformation that you are still responsible for driving? you know, we had to do some great things during this time around, um, you know, in the UK for one of the things that I want to ask you about, I'm again, looking at DevOps from the inside But one of the things I'd love to get your perspective I always say that, you know, you're only as good as your lowest And, you know, What are some of the shifts in terms of expectations Um, you know, there's a thing that I think people I mean, we talk about collaboration, but how do we actually, you know, do that and have something that did you face and figure out quickly enough to be able to pivot so fast? and that's the kind of trade off that we have to make, how do we actually deal with that and hide that from So we haven't got, you know, the cost of the last 12 months. What are some of the core technology capabilities that you see really as kind demands for the team, and, you know, with the pressures on, at the moment where we're being asked to do things, And for me, and from a testing point of view, you know, mounds and mounds of testing, we are, um, you let's start in bits that we do well, you know, we've started creating, ops as it comes more and more to the fore as we go to cloud, and that's what we need to, Last question then for you is how would you advise your peers in a similar situation to You know, do they want it to be, um, more agile and, you know, or do they want to, especially if the business hold the purse strings, which in, in, uh, you know, in some companies include not as they And I know, you know, sometimes what is AI Well, thank you so much for giving us this sort of insight outlook at dev ops sharing the So thank you ever so much. I'm Lisa Martin. the entire DevOps pipeline from planning to production, actionable This release is ready to go wherever you are in your DevOps journey. Great to have you all three together We're going to start with you spiritual co-location that's a really interesting topic that we've we've And that's one of the things that you see coming out of the agile Um, you know, surgeon, I worked together a long, long time ago. Talk to me about what your thoughts are about spiritual of co-location I think, you know, it starts with kind of a shared purpose and the other understanding, that to you in a way that these different stakeholders can, can look at from their different lens. And Glen, we talked a lot about transformation with you last time. And w I've certainly found that with our, um, you know, continuing relationship with Broadcom, So it's really important that as I say, for a number of different aspects, that you have the right partner, then we can talk to the teams, um, around, you know, could they be doing better component testing? What are the metrics So that's one of the ways that you get to a shared purpose, cause we're all trying to deliver around that um, you know, some of the classics or maybe things like defect, density, or meantime to response. later in the evening, are they delivering, uh, you know, on the weekends as well? teams the context that they need to do their job, uh, in a way that creates the most value for the customers. And, and, and also how do you measure quality kind of following the business had a kind of comfort that, you know, everything was tested together and therefore it's safer. Um, and with agile, there's that kind of, you know, how do we make sure that, you know, if we're doing things quick and we're getting stuff out the door that of, uh, you know, setting up benchmarks, right? And so one of the things that we really need to evolve, um, as an industry is to understand that we need to do in terms of classifying, descend type patterns, um, you know, And one of the things that I think you could see tooling do is The one thing that you believe our audience really needs to be on the lookout for and to put and dev ops are the peanut butter and chocolate to support creative, uh, But I think the last, um, the last thing for me is how do you really instill and having the confidence to actually do more testing in production and go straight to production itself. And if you read through the report, it's all about the I think this was an incredibly valuable fruitful conversation, and we appreciate all of you

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

SergePERSON

0.99+

GlenPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

Serge LucioPERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeffery HammondPERSON

0.99+

GlennPERSON

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

26QUANTITY

0.99+

Glenn MartinPERSON

0.99+

50 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

BroadcomORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeff HammondPERSON

0.99+

tensQUANTITY

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

BenPERSON

0.99+

10 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

UKLOCATION

0.99+

two hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

15 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

sevenQUANTITY

0.99+

9:00 PMDATE

0.99+

two hourQUANTITY

0.99+

14 stacksQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

GlynnPERSON

0.99+

two dayQUANTITY

0.99+

MartinPERSON

0.99+

Glynn MartinPERSON

0.99+

KirstenPERSON

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

SRE ValleyORGANIZATION

0.99+

five o'clockDATE

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

millionsQUANTITY

0.99+

second aspectQUANTITY

0.99+

Glen JeffPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

14QUANTITY

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

three weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

Amanda silverPERSON

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

seven teamsQUANTITY

0.99+

tens of thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

Serge Lucio, Glyn Martin & Jeffery Hammond V1


 

>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of DevOps virtual forum. Brought to you by Broadcom. >> Hi guys, welcome back. So we have discussed the current state and the near future state of DevOps and how it's going to evolve from three unique perspectives. In this last segment, we're going to open up the floor and see if we can come to a shared understanding of where DevOps needs to go. In order to be successful next year. So our guests today are you've seen them all before. Jeffrey Hammond is here the VP and Principal Analyst serving CIO at Forrester. We've also got Serge Lucio, the GM of Broadcom Enterprise Software Division. And Glyn Martin, the head of QA Transformation at BT. Guys welcome back. Great to have you all three together. >> Hi Lisa. (Serge speaks faintly) >> Good to be here. >> All right. So we're all very socially distanced as we talked about before. Great to have this conversation. So let's start with one of the topics that we kicked off the forum with. Jeff, we're going to start with you spiritual colocation. That's a really interesting topic that we've uncovered. But how much of the challenge is truly cultural? And what can we solve through technology? Jeff, we'll start with you, then Serge, then Glyn, Jeff take it away. >> Yeah I think fundamentally, you can have all the technology in the world. And if you don't make the right investments in the cultural practices in your development organization. You still won't be effective. Almost 10 years ago, I wrote a piece. Where I did a bunch of research around what made high performance teams software delivery teams high performance. And one of the things that came out as part of that was that these teams have a high level of autonomy. And that's one of the things that you see coming out of the Agile Manifesto. Let's take that today. Where developers are on their own in their own offices. if you've got teams where the team itself had a high level of autonomy. And they know how to work, they can make decisions. They can move forward. They're not waiting for management to tell them what to do. And so what we have seen is that organizations that embraced autonomy, and got their teams in the right place. And their teams had the information that they needed to make the right decisions. Have actually been able to operate pretty well, even as they've been remote. And it's turned out to be things like well, how do we actually push the software that we've created into production that have become the challenge is not. Are we writing the right software? And that's why I think the term spiritual colocation is so important. Because even though we may be physically distant, we're on the same plane, we're connected from a shared purpose. There's a Surgeon I worked together a long, long time ago, so just it's been what, almost 15-16 years, since we worked at the same place. And yet I would say there's probably still a certain level of spiritual colocation, between us. because of this shared purposes that we've had in the past and what we've seen in the industry, and that's a really powerful tool to build on. So what do tools play as part of that, to the extent that tools make information available to build shared purpose on. To the extent that they enable communication so that we can build that spiritual colocation. To the extent that they reinforce the culture that we want to put in place. They can be incredibly valuable, especially when we don't have the luxury of physical colocation. Hope that makes sense.(chuckles) >> It does. I should have introduced this last segment as we're all spiritually colocated. All right. So Serge, clearly you're still spiritually colocated with Jeff. Talk to me about what your thoughts are about spiritual of colocation. The cultural impact and how technology can move it forward? >> Yes, so I think, while I'm going to sound very similar to Jeff in that respect. I think it starts with kind of shared purpose, and understanding how individuals teams contribute to kind of a business outcome. What is our shared goals our shared vision with what is it we're trying to achieve collectively. And keeping kind of the line to that. And so it really starts with it Now, the big challenge always is over the last 20 years, especially in large organization has been specialization of roles and functions. And so we all have started to basically measure which we do on a daily basis using metrics, which oftentimes are completely disconnected from kind of a business outcome. Or is it on purpose. We kind of revert that to Okay, what is my database uptime? What is my cycle time? Right. And I think which we can do or where we really should be focused as an industry is to start to basically provide a lens for these different stakeholders to look at what they're doing. In the context of benefiting this business outcomes. So, probably one of my theories experience was to actually witness at one of our large financial institution. Two stakeholders across development and operations staring at the same data. Like which was related to economy changes, test execution results, coverage, official liabilities, and all the overran direction of incidents. And when you start to put these things in context, and represent that in a way that these different stakeholders can look at from their different lens. And they can start to basically communicate, and understand how they jointly or complement to do that kind of common vision or objective. >> And Glyn, we talked a lot about transformation with you last time. What are your thoughts on spiritual colocation and the cultural part of technology impact? >> Yeah, I mean I agree with Jeffrey that, you know, the people and culture are the most important thing. Actually, that's why it's really important when you're transforming to have partners who have the same vision as you. Who you can work with have the same end goal in mind. And we would constantly found that with our continuing relationship with Broadcom. What it also does, are those tools can accelerate what you're doing and can drive consistency. You know, we've seen within simplify, which is BT's Flagship Transformation Program, where we're trying to as it says, simplify the number of system stacks that we have. The number of products that we have, actually at the moment we've got different value streams within that program. Who have got organizational silos who are trying to rewrite the wheel. Who are still doing things manually. So in order to try and bring that consistency, we need the right tools that actually are at an enterprise grade, which can be flexible to work with in BT. Which is such a complex and very different environment, depending on what area BT you're in. Whether it's consumer, whether it's a mobile area, whether it's large global or government organizations. We found that we need tools that can drive that consistency. But also flex to Greenfield Brownfield kind of technologies as well. So it's really important that as it's a from a number of different aspects. That you have the right partner, and to drive the right culture here, and the same vision, but also who have the tool sets to help you accelerate, They can't do that on their own. But they can help accelerate what it is you're trying to do. And a really good example of that is we're trying to shift left, which is probably a quite a bit of a buzz phrase. And they're kind of testing well at the moment. But I could talk about things like Continuous Delivery Director to Broadcom tools. And it has many different features to it, but very simply on its own. It allows us to give the visibility of what the teams are doing. And once we have that visibility, then we can talk to the teams around could they be doing better component testing? Could they be using some virtualized services here or there? And that's not even the main purpose of Continuous Delivery Director. But it's just a reason that tools themselves can just give greater visibility of have much more intuitive and insightful conversations with other teams and reduce those organizational silos. >> Thanks, Glyn So we kind of sum that up autonomy, collaboration tools that facilitate that. So let's talk now about metrics. From your perspective, what are the metrics that matter Jeff? >> Well, I'm going to go right back to what Glyn said about data that provides visibility that enables us to to make decisions with shared purpose. And so business value has to be one of the first things that we looking at. How do we assess whether we have built something that is valuable? That could be sales revenue, it could be Net Promoter Score, if you're not selling what you've built, it could even be what the level of reuse is within your organization. Or other teams picking up the services that you've created. One of the things that I've begun to see organizations do is to align value streams with customer journeys. And then to align teams with those value streams. So that's one of the ways that you get to a shared purpose. 'Cause we're all trying to deliver around that customer journey. The value associated with it. And we're all measured on that. There are flow metrics, which are really important. How long does it take us to get a new feature out. From the time that we conceive it to the time that we can run our first experiments with it. There are quality metrics, some of the classics or maybe things like defect density or meantime to response. One of my favorites came from a company called Ultimate Software. Where they looked at the ratio of defects found in Production defects found in pre production. And their developers were in fact measured on that ratio and told them that guess what quality is your job too. Not just the test departments group. The fourth level that I think is really important in the current situation that we're in, is the level of engagement in your development organization. We used to joke that we measured this with the parking lot metric. How how full was the parking lot at 9, and how full was it at 5 o'clock. I can't do that anymore, since we're not physically colocated. But what you can do is you can look at how folks are delivering. You can look at your metrics in your SCCM environment, you can look at the relative rates of churn, you can look at things like well are our developers delivering during longer periods. Earlier in the morning, later in the evening? Are they delivering on the weekends as well. Are those signs that we might be heading toward burnout, because folks are still running at sprint levels instead of marathon levels. So all of those in combination, business value, flow, engagement and quality. I think form the backbone of any sort of metrics program. The second thing that I think you need to look at is what are we going to do with the data and the philosophy behind the data is critical. Unfortunately I see organizations where they weaponize the data. And that's completely the wrong way to look at it. What you need to do is you need to say. "How is this data helping us to identify the blockers? The things that aren't allowing us to provide the right context for people to do the right thing? And then what do we do to remove those blockers to make sure that we're giving these autonomous teams, the context that they need to do their job in a way that creates the most value for the customers?" >> Great advice, Jeff. Glyn over to you metrics that matter to you that really make a big impact. And also how do you measure quality kind of following on to the advice that Jeff provided? >> I mean, Jeff provided some great advice. Actually, he talks about value, he talks about flow, both of those things are very much on my mind at the moment. But there was a time, listen to a speaker called Mia Kirsten, a couple of months ago, he talked very much around how important flow management is. And remove and using that to remove waste, to understand in terms of, making software changes. What is it that's causing us to do it longer than we need to? So where are those areas where it takes too long. So I think that's a very important thing. For us, it's even more basic than that at the moment. We're on a journey from moving from waterfall to agile. And the problem with moving from waterfall to agile is, with waterfall, the the business had a kind of comfort that everything was tested together, and therefore it's safer. And with agile, there's that kind of how do we make sure that you know, if we're doing things quick, and we're getting stuff out the door that we give that confidence, that that's ready to go? Or if there's a risk that we're able to truly articulate what that risk is. So there's a bit about release confidence. And some of the metrics around that and how healthy those releases are and actually saying we spend a lot of money, in an investment setting up agile teams training agile teams. Are we actually seeing them deliver more quickly? And are we actually seeing them deliver more value quickly? So yeah, those are the two main things for me at the moment. But I think it's also about, generally bringing it all together DevOps. We've got the kind of value ops, AI Ops. How do we actually bring that together to so we can make quick decisions, and making sure that we are delivering the biggest bang for our partners. >> Absolutely biggest bang for the partners. Serge your thoughts. >> Yes I think we all agree, right? It starts with business metrics, flow metrics. These are one of the most important metrics and ultimately, I mean, one of the things that's very common across I highly functional teams is engagements, right? When you see a team that's highly functional, and that's agile, that practices DevOps everyday. They are highly engaged. That definitely true. Now back to you, I think, Jeff's points on weaponization of metrics. One of the key challenges we see is that organizations traditionally have been kind of, setting up benchmarks. Right. So what is a good cycle time? What is a good mean time? What is a good mean time to repair? The problem is that this is very contextual, right? It's going to vary quite a bit, depending on the nature of application and system. And so one of the things that we really need to evolve as an industry. Is to understand that it's not so much about those flow metrics is about are these flow metrics ultimately contribute to the business metric. To the business outcome. So that's one thing. The second aspect, I think that's oftentimes misunderstood, is that when you have a bad cycle time or what you perceive as being a bad cycle time or bad quality. The problem is oftentimes like, how do you go and explore why, right? What is the root cause of this? And I think one of the key challenges is that we tend to focus a lot of time on metrics. And not on the I type patterns, which are pretty common across the industry. If you look at for instance things like, lead time for instance. It's very common that organizational boundaries are going to be a key contributor to bad lead time. And so I think that there is reviewing the metrics, there is I think a lot of work that we need to do in terms of classifying this untied PaaS. Back to you, Jeff, I think you're one of the cool offers of Water-Scrum Fall as a key pattern in the industry or anti-patterns. >> Yeah >> But Water Scrum Fall, right. Is the key one right? And you will detect that through kind of a defect rival rates. That's right, that looks like an S curve. And so I think it's the output of the metrics is what do you do with those metrics. >> Right. I'll tell you Serge, one of the things that is really interesting to me in that space is. I think those of us had been in industry for a long time, we know the anti patterns, 'cause we've seen them in our career,(laughs) maybe in multiple times. And one of the things that I think you could see tooling do is perhaps provide some notification of anti patterns based on the telemetry that comes in. I think it would be a really interesting place to apply machine learning and reinforcement learning techniques. So hopefully something that we'd see in the future with DevOps tools. 'Cause as a manager that maybe only a 10 year veteran or a 15 year veteran. You may be seeing these anti patterns for the first time, and it would sure be nice to know what to do when they start to pop up.(chuckles) >> That would right? Insight, always helpful. All right guys, I would like to get your final thoughts on the fit one thing that you believe our audience really needs to be on the lookout for. and to put on our agendas. For the next 12 months. Jeff will be back to you. >> I would say, look for the opportunities that this disruption presents. And there are a couple that I see. First of all, as we shift to remote central working, we're unlocking new pools of talent. Where it's possible to implement more geographic diversity. So look to that as part of your strategy. Number two, look for new types of tools. We've seen a lot of interest in usage of low code tools. To very quickly develop applications. That's potentially part of a mainstream strategy as we go into 2021. Finally, make sure that you embrace this idea that you are supporting creative workers. That agile and DevOps are the peanut butter and chocolate to support creative workers with algorithmic capabilities. >> Peanut butter and chocolate. Glyn where do we go from there? What's the one silver bullet that you think that needs to be on the look out for? >> (indistinct) out I certainly agree that low code is next year, we'll see much more low code. We've already started going moving towards more of a SaaS based world but low code also. I think as well for me, we've still got one foot in the kind of cloud camp. We'll be fully trying to explore what that means going into the next year and exploiting the capabilities of cloud. But I think the last thing for me is, how do you really instill quality throughout the kind of the life cycle When I heard the word scrum for it kind of made me shut it. 'Cause I know that's a problem. That's where we're at with some of our things at the moment. So we need to get beyond that we need to be releasing changes more frequently into production. And actually being a bit more brave and having the confidence to actually do more testing in production and going straight to production itself. So expect to see much more of that next year. Yeah, thank you. I haven't got any food analogies unfortunately. (laughs) >> We all need some peanut butter and chocolate. All right Serge, Just take us on that sir. What's that nugget you think everyone needs to have on their agendas? >> That's interesting, right? So a couple of days ago, we had kind of a latest state of the DevOps report, right? And if you read through the report, it's all about velocity, right? It's all about we still are perceiving DevOps as being all about speed. And so to me the key advice is, in order to create kind of this spiritual colocation in order to foster engagement. We have to go back to what is it we're trying to do collectively. We have to go back to tie everything to the business outcome. And so for me, it's absolutely imperative for organizations to start to plot their value streams. To understand how they're delivering value into allowing everything they do from a metrics to delivery to flow to those metrics. And only with data, I think, are we going to be able to actually start to to restart to align kind of all these roles across the organizations and drive not just speed, but business outcomes. >> All about business outcomes. I think you guys, the three of you could write a book together. So I'll give you that as food for thought. Thank you all so much for joining me. Today and our guests, I think this was an incredibly valuable, fruitful conversation. And we appreciate all of you taking the time to spiritually colocate with us today. Guys, thank you. >> Thank you Lisa. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> For Jeff Hammond, Serge Lucio and Glyn Martin. I'm Lisa Martin. Thank you for watching the Broadcom DevOps virtual forum. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Nov 13 2020

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Broadcom. and how it's going to evolve Hi Lisa. But how much of the challenge And that's one of the things that you see Talk to me about what your thoughts are And keeping kind of the line to that. and the cultural part The number of products that we have, of sum that up autonomy, the context that they need to do their job metrics that matter to you And the problem with moving bang for the partners. One of the key challenges we see is what do you do with those metrics. And one of the things that I and to put on our agendas. That agile and DevOps are the that needs to be on the look out for? and exploiting the capabilities of cloud. What's that nugget you think And so to me the key advice is, taking the time to spiritually Thank you for watching the

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
SergePERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

GlynPERSON

0.99+

Jeff HammondPERSON

0.99+

Glyn MartinPERSON

0.99+

Jeffrey HammondPERSON

0.99+

Serge LucioPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Mia KirstenPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

BroadcomORGANIZATION

0.99+

second aspectQUANTITY

0.99+

5 o'clockDATE

0.99+

Jeffery HammondPERSON

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

one footQUANTITY

0.99+

9DATE

0.99+

todayDATE

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

BTORGANIZATION

0.98+

fourth levelQUANTITY

0.98+

agileTITLE

0.98+

first experimentsQUANTITY

0.98+

Agile ManifestoTITLE

0.98+

two main thingsQUANTITY

0.98+

Ultimate SoftwareORGANIZATION

0.97+

second thingQUANTITY

0.97+

Broadcom Enterprise Software DivisionORGANIZATION

0.96+

DevOpsTITLE

0.95+

couple of months agoDATE

0.94+

FirstQUANTITY

0.94+

Two stakeholdersQUANTITY

0.93+

couple of days agoDATE

0.91+

ContinuousTITLE

0.9+

10 years agoDATE

0.89+

one thingQUANTITY

0.85+

15 year veteranQUANTITY

0.83+

Number twoQUANTITY

0.83+

10 year veteranQUANTITY

0.83+

Broadcom DevOpsORGANIZATION

0.83+

last 20 yearsDATE

0.81+

Dipak Prasad, Dell Technologies Cloud | Dell Technologies World 2020


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Dell Technologies. World digital experience brought to you by Dell Technologies. Hey, Welcome back, everybody. Jeffrey here with the Cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of Dell Technology. World 2020. The digital experience, Uh, not in person like nothing this year, 2020. But the digital experience allows to do a lot of things that you couldn't do in person. And we're excited to have our next guest. He is Deepak Prasad, the director of product management for Dell Technologies. Cloud deep. Uh, great to see you. >>Hello, Jeff. Nice to meet you as well. >>You too. So let's let's back up, like, 10,000 square feet, cause you know, Cloud came in with a big giant rage. I guess it's been a while now with AWS and Public Cloud. And people are putting their depth tests on there. And, you know, we've seen this explosion of public cloud, and then we have hybrid cloud and multi cloud. And then, you know, basically people figured out that not everything can go to a public cloud. A lot of stuff. Shouldn't some stuffs gonna stay in data centers? for all different reasons, >>but >>basically it's horses for courses. So we're a little ways into this. How are you guys, Adele, really thinking about Cloud and helping your customers think about what cloud is beyond, you know, kind of the hype. >>Well, that's a great question, Jeff. At Dell, we think of Cloud really as an operating model and as an operating experience rather than a destination. So it's interesting that you bring up Public Cloud and Private Cloud, but we take a step back and think of what does that experience really represent? So if you think off, uh, you know what defines that cloud operating model? It's, ah, democratization of technology. Access off resource is through a p. I s through self service portals ability to pay as you go in a very simplified commerce experience and the agility of cloud. You know, the promise off instant availability of infinite scalability. Now, if if you look at you know the landscape around this until now, that has only been delivered in a consistent way by public cloud vendors, which leads people to believe that really cloud is the destination, not an operating model. But we think that we are capable of bringing those experiences those tenets off the cloud operating model to the on premises experience and really taking location out of the conversation. So this really allows our customers to focus mawr on their workloads than visions. They want to drive, and then they can fit there, uh, requirements their application requirements to the location where those resource is our regardless of having toe worry about it. This is public or private. They will get the same operating experience. They will get the same scalability, the same simplified commerce, the same access Thio resource is >>right. Well, let's talk about some of some of those things because, as you said, there's a lot of behaviors that are involved in cloud and cloud operating. You know, one of the behaviors that I think gave the public cloud an early leg up was just simply provisioning, right? Simply, if somebody needs some capacity, they need some horsepower to get interesting. It would be tested in the early days. No, they didn't have to provision. They didn't have to put in an order with I t and wait for so long to get a box assigned to them or purchased or whatever, right? They just swipe the credit card and went, How have you kind of help People have that kind of ease of use ease of, uh, he's of spin up piece of creation on what the right verb is because I think that's a really core piece of what enabled early cloud adoption. >>No, absolutely, you're spot on. And that was a big part of it that if somebody needed resource is instead of waiting for weeks and months, they could go on and and sign up for those resource and get almost instantaneous access. And we believe that what we're doing in this area is really transforming the business. Today. We can deliver resource is to customers in their data center in 14 days and really are aggressively looking to cut that down further. So what this really means is not just shipping Resource is in 14 days, but actually delivering a cloud experience in the customer's data center or of cola location, whatever, you know, location of their choice in 14 days and making that available to the customers, not just through the traditional procurement process. But we're actually very proud to announce the cloud Council, the Dell Technologies Cloud Council, through which customers can, in a self service way, order those ordered those resource is and have it show up and be operational in their environment in 14 days. So we're really bringing that speed of cloud to the on premise experience, >>right? So how how does it actually work? Do you pre? Do you pre ship some amount of capacity beyond what you believe is currently needed just to kind of forward que you will, if you will capacity. How does it work from from both the implementation strategy in terms of the actual compute and storage capacity, as well as on kind of the purchasing peace? Because those air to kind of very >>different work flows? No, that's a That's a great question. So for us, our strength are really in supply chain management that allows us to build capabilities across the world in areas from where we can ship the customers almost on the on demand basis. So as soon as we get in order that the customer needs a probably probably cloud deployment in a certain location, were able to mobilize those resource is from those locations and have it instance she hated in customers environ. So it's really built a strength off over the years off optimizing supply chain, if you will, and just bring taking that to the next level off. >>Okay, so we don't, >>uh environment we said. Yeah, >>no problem. I was gonna say the another great characteristics of cloud right is is spinning up, which we hear about all the time versus spinning down and write. The easiest example is always use. If you're running, you know, some promotion. If your pizza hut you're running a promotion for the Super Bowl, obviously, right? Your demand for that thing is gonna be huge. You want to spin up to be able to take advantage of all the people cash in their coupon, and then when the Super Bowls over, >>you >>want to spend those resource is down because you're not going to necessarily need that capacity. How do you guys accomplish that type of flexibility in your solution? >>So in our subscription model, we have different ways to address customer environment. So we allow customers to start very small and then and then grow the subscription as the requirements growth and the key thing of our subscription, which is really unique, is the ability to quote Terminate. So, for example, if if a customer started off on the three year subscription with the, uh resource is for, say, 100 virtual machines and somewhere along the way they needed to add resource is for 50 more virtual machines, so they will pay for the 150 virtual machines. But that extra 50 virtual machines does not create an orphan or a child subscription. At the end of three years, everything terminates together, so it really gives them flexibility with, you know, ability to start small and not have to worry about vendor lock in. And now we started off with sort of a reserved instance type off subscription model. But we're definitely bringing usage based models as well, which allows more, even more flexibility with respect to speeding up and speeding down. Right. >>And then what are some of the real specific reasons that people go for this type of solution versus a public cloud where some of the rial inherent advantages of doing this within my own infrastructure, my own data center, my own, you know, kind of virtual four walls, if you will. >>Yeah, you know, we strongly believe that the decision should really be guided by workload requirements. There's certain workloads that work really well in on premises environment. For example, you could take virtual desktop environments V. D. I. That works really well from a performance standpoint in In on premise, environment versus a public cloud environment. Similarly, there are other workloads were not public cloud deniers that that are best suited for public cloud. But it's really it should be something that's that comes from understanding your application. Understanding the leighton see requirements, understanding the data requirements for those applications. You know, what are your egress? Uh, issues. Or, you know, uh, the profile off the workload that you're trying to implement That should really be the driving force in where the workload this place >>and then, uh, tell us a little bit about the partnership with VM Ware because that's a huge asset that you have, you know, now you know, basically side by side and you can leverage the technology as well as a lot of the assets that are envy. And where how does that change? The way you guys have taken the Dell Cloud platform to market >>it really is a a differentiating factor for us. From a technology standpoint, it allows us to bring the best of both worlds best off off the hardware infrastructure as well as the best off the cloud. Stack the cloud software infrastructure together in one cohesive and and well developed package. So, uh, the Dell Technologies Cloud Platform from a technology standpoint is implemented with our VX rail appliances, which is a hyper converge infrastructure as well as VM ware clad foundation from a software standpoint. Now the code developed and jointly engineered capabilities allow for unique, unique feature off. Remember Cloud Foundation, where it can do lifecycle management off the entire stack, both the hardware and the software from a single interface. So it understands Vieques rails and understands the different form where levels and the X, where manager software versions etcetera. And then it would automatically select what is the best and well tested and supported software bundle that could be deployed without causing, you know, typical issues with version mismatches and trying to chase down different hardware compatibility, matrices, etcetera. All of those are eliminated, so it's a integrated lifecycle management experience. That's great. E. I'm sorry I have >>a little bit, a little bit of a lot of here, so I I apologize. >>I >>was just gonna say you've been at this for a while. Your product, you know, product management. So you're really thinking about speeds and feeds and you're thinking about roadmap and futures? I wonder if you can share your perspective on this evolution from kind of this race of to pure public cloud to this. This big discussion I think we had packed Elson. You're talking about a hybrid cloud back at being where 2013. So then, you know kind of this hybrid cloud and multi cloud and really kind of this maturation of this space as we as we've progressed for Ah, while now probably 10 years. >>Yeah. Yeah. And, uh, majority of our customers live in a multi cloud world. They have resource is that they consumed from one or more multi hyper sorry, uh, public cloud vendors and they have one or more on premise vendors as well, For their resource is and managing that complex environment across multiple providers with different skill set different tools, different sls. While it sounds really interesting to, you know, have workload drive your your deployment and place the workloads where they're best suited. It does prevent. It does present a challenge off managing a complex and and getting even more complex by the day, multi cloud environment. And that's where we think we have an advantage. Uh, based on some of the work that we're doing with the Dell Technologies Cloud console to bring a true multi cloud experience to our customers. Not one of the benefits of not being a, you know, a public cloud provider is that we are agnostic toe. All public cloud providers were fully accepting that certain workloads need to live in those environments. And through our cloud council, we will make it easy for customers to manage not only their on premises, assets and on premises. Cloud resource is, but also cloud resource is that reside in multiple public cloud vendors? >>That's good. Yeah, because it helps, right, because they've got stuff everywhere. It's like that, you know, there is no del technology, right? There's a lot of there's a lot of people that work there. There's a lot of project. There's a lot of, you know, kind of pieces to that puzzle. I wonder too. If you could share your perspective on kind of application modernization, right, That's always another big, you know, kind of topic. You should You should you take those old legacy APS. And could you should you try to rebuild them in, um, or cloud native way using containers and and all this flexibility and deploy them or, you know, which one. Should you just leave alone right there, running fine. They've been running fine for a while. They've got some basic core functionality that may be do or don't need toe to kind of modernize if you will. And maybe those resources should be spent on building in a new applications and new kind of areas of competitive differentiation. When you're working with their clients, how do you tell them to think about at modernization? >>Yeah, we looked at it from a business requirement standpoint. Off how what end goals. A customer trying to achieve through that application. And in some cases, you know, on you cover the spectrum, right there. Some cases modernization just means swapping out the hardware and putting it, putting that application on a more modern, more powerful hardware. At the other end, it z you know, going toe assassin model off, you know, everything available through through a cloud application. And in between those two extremities, there's, you know, virtualization that is re factoring this continual ization and micro services based implementation. But it comes down to understanding why that application is meant to deliver for who and what business requirements and business objectives that fulfills. That's how we use as a guiding principle on how to position application modernization to customers. >>All right, that's super helpful, because I'm sure that's a big topic. And, you know, there's probably certain APS that you just should not. You just shouldn't touch. You should probably just even Malone. They're running just fine. Let them do their thing. All >>right, fine. I'm sorry. No. Is this interesting? I was a conversation with the customer just earlier today where they have a portion off their infrastructure of some applications that they absolutely wanted to leave alone and and just change out the underlying hardware. But there are other applications where they really want to adopt, continue ization and re factor those out, rewrite those applications so that they can have more scalability and more flexibility around that. So it really is is determined by the needs. Yeah. >>Um so last question, del Tech world this year was a digital experience, like all the other shows that we've seen here in 2020 just But it's a huge event, right? A big, big show, and we're excited to be back to cover it again. But I'm curious if there's some special announcements within such a big show. Sometimes things get lost a little bit here in there, but any special announcements You want to make sure that get highlighted that people may have missed within this kind of see if content over the last several days >>22 major things that that I'm very excited to share with you One is Dell Technologies Cloud platform. We actually discussing and talking about Dell Technologies cloud platform in the concept off instant capacity blocks. So in the past, we talked about it with respect to notes. Uh, you know, adult technology cloud platform. You can have, you know, so many notes in it to power your your on premises. Cloud resource is but really have changed the conversation and look into how cloud customers air consuming those resource is and we really want to drive focus to that and introduced the concept of instance Capacity blocks instances are think of it as a workload profile, you know, CPU and memory put together and then, uh, in different combinations in a pre defined way to address different workload needs. So this really changes the conversation for our customers that they don't have to worry about designing or or speaking out the hardware platforms, but really understand how many resource is they need, how many, how much you know, processing power, how much memory, how much stories they need and they define their requirements was in those terms, and we will deliver those instance capacity blocks to them in their data centers. So behind the scenes is built by best in class. Uh, you know, hardware from Vieques rails and best in class software from being where, but it's really delivered in terms off instant capacity blocks. The second interesting thing that I wanna share with you and I profession a few times is Dell Technologies Cloud console. We're building this single pane of glass to manage our customers entire journey from on premises to multi cloud hybrid cloud with consistency off. How you can discover services how you can order services and how you can grow your the manager footprint. So those are a couple things from adult technology standpoint that we're really excited to share with people. >>Well, congratulations. I know you've been busting your tail for for quite a while on these types of projects, and it's nice to be able to finally release him out to the world. >>Well, it's just my pleasure. Alright. Thank you very much. >>Well, thank you for stopping by again. Congratulations. And will continue the ongoing coverage of Dell Technology World 2020. The digital experience. I'm Jeff Frick. He's to Park Prasad. You're watching the Cube. See you next time. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Oct 22 2020

SUMMARY :

But the digital experience allows to do a lot of things that you couldn't do in person. So let's let's back up, like, 10,000 square feet, cause you know, you know, kind of the hype. I s through self service portals ability to pay as you go in a Well, let's talk about some of some of those things because, as you said, there's a lot of behaviors that are involved in cloud whatever, you know, location of their choice in 14 days and making that of capacity beyond what you believe is currently needed just to kind of forward So it's really built a strength off over the years off optimizing uh environment we said. Your demand for that thing is gonna be huge. How do you guys accomplish that you know, ability to start small and not have to worry about vendor lock in. my own data center, my own, you know, kind of virtual four walls, if you will. Yeah, you know, we strongly believe that the decision should really be guided The way you guys have taken the Dell Cloud platform to market software bundle that could be deployed without causing, you know, typical issues with version mismatches So then, you know kind of this hybrid cloud and multi cloud and really kind of this maturation of not being a, you know, a public cloud provider is that we are There's a lot of, you know, you know, on you cover the spectrum, right there. And, you know, there's probably certain APS that by the needs. like all the other shows that we've seen here in 2020 just But it's a huge event, You can have, you know, so many notes in it to power your your on premises. and it's nice to be able to finally release him out to the world. Thank you very much. Well, thank you for stopping by again.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Deepak PrasadPERSON

0.99+

Dipak PrasadPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

three yearQUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

AdelePERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

100 virtual machinesQUANTITY

0.99+

10,000 square feetQUANTITY

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

Super BowlsEVENT

0.99+

Super BowlEVENT

0.99+

150 virtual machinesQUANTITY

0.99+

Dell Technologies Cloud CouncilORGANIZATION

0.99+

50 virtual machinesQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Dell TechnologyORGANIZATION

0.99+

14 daysQUANTITY

0.99+

14 daysQUANTITY

0.99+

Park PrasadPERSON

0.98+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

two extremitiesQUANTITY

0.98+

del technologyORGANIZATION

0.97+

single interfaceQUANTITY

0.97+

both worldsQUANTITY

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

Dell Technologies CloudORGANIZATION

0.95+

Public CloudORGANIZATION

0.94+

cloud CouncilORGANIZATION

0.94+

50 more virtual machinesQUANTITY

0.93+

this yearDATE

0.92+

VM WareORGANIZATION

0.92+

22 major thingsQUANTITY

0.91+

ViequesORGANIZATION

0.91+

this yearDATE

0.9+

earlier todayDATE

0.9+

MaloneORGANIZATION

0.89+

single paneQUANTITY

0.82+

ElsonORGANIZATION

0.8+

APSORGANIZATION

0.78+

egressORGANIZATION

0.74+

Technology World 2020EVENT

0.69+

Cloud PlatformTITLE

0.67+

OneQUANTITY

0.66+

couple thingsQUANTITY

0.64+

CloudTITLE

0.62+

TechnologiesCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.61+

ThioORGANIZATION

0.57+

Public CloudTITLE

0.56+

PrivateTITLE

0.52+

daysDATE

0.52+

lastDATE

0.5+

FoundationORGANIZATION

0.44+

WorldEVENT

0.4+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.39+

CloudORGANIZATION

0.39+

Jim Shook, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2020


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Dell Technologies. World Digital Experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Hey, welcome back. You're ready. Jeffrey here with the Cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of Dell Technology World 2020. The Digital Experience. I'm coming to you from Palo Alto. It's a digital event, just like everything else in 2020. But we're excited to have our next guest. I think he's coming in all the way from Atlanta, Georgia. He's Jim Shook, the director of cyber security and compliance practice at Del Technology. Jim, Great to see you. >>Thanks, Jeff. It's quite the title there. Thanks for getting all that out. >>I have a big posted notes so that, uh, that's very helpful. But, you know, it's it's actually kind of an interesting thing because you have compliance and cybersecurity and your title, and it's it's It's interesting relationship between compliance as a motivator of behavior versus you know, you need to go a lot further than just what the compliance says. So I'm curious if you can talk about that relationship between yeah, we need to be compliant, and we need to follow the rules. But you need to think a lot bigger than that. >>Yeah, definitely. I mean, there's so many different standards out there and requirements. So typically, what we'll see on the regulatory side is very much a minimum baseline, and leading the way, as usual in the cybersecurity space, will be financial and health care organizations. That's particularly true in the US, but pretty much globally, at least on the financial side. So they'll set some baselines. A lot of industries don't really have many. And so what we look at many times is just general risk to the business. And, of course, if you're a publicly traded company, that might trigger some SEC requirements or other things like that. But again, we really look at those requirements as minimum baselines, and you have to work up from there based on the organization's risk profile. >>Yeah, yeah, and we see that we see that, too, with privacy and a whole a whole bunch of stuff where traditionally the regs and the compliance kind of lag, you know where the technologies and where the markets moving. So let's before we get too deep into it. Let's let's talk about the cove it impact because obviously a huge thing. Insecurity, Uh, you know, a light switch moment in mid March when everybody had to work from home. So suddenly your tax surfaces increase exponentially. People are working out of home environments that you don't necessarily know what's going on there. Who's going on there, The shared networks with the spouse and the kids and and everybody else. And but now we're, you know, 678 months into this. This is something that's going to be going on for a while, and even the new normal will have some type of a hybrid relationship with with, you know, an increased level of remote remote work once they work from home. But it's really work from anywhere. So I wonder if you could share your thoughts about how things have transitioned from you know, what happened in mid March, taking care of your own business and your own people to, you know, then taking care of your customers and the emergencies that they had. But now really thinking in terms of more of kind of a long term, fundamental shift in the security profile that people have with all their data and information >>Yeah. Gosh, it's been really interesting. I think organizations have done an amazing job when you think about the things that they've had to get done just really overnight. So a lot has been written about the pandemic, and you mentioned Jeff to really that expanded threats surface. All of a sudden, you've got people working from home. There wasn't enough VPN capacity. A lot of places. I talked to some organizations. Employees just took their desktop off of their desk and brought it home so it wasn't really ready toe work at a remote location. But organizations really adapted well to it. Meanwhile, that was opportunity for the criminals, and they've taken it. But Jeff, one of the things that I think about two is to an extent, this is the new normal, not necessarily the work from home, but the shift that's going to consistently happen in cybersecurity. Things change. The criminals air really smart, they adapt. So that was work from home. What's the next thing going to be? There's I O T. There's remote devices. There will be some vulnerabilities. We just have to get used to this pace and continue it. Unfortunately, >>right, right, right Yeah, it's always it's always a little bit of, Ah, a cat and mouse game, Right? But what? And then one of the other trends that we're seeing, I don't know, maybe more visibility or maybe higher profile is is the ransomware attacks, right? So we've seen, you know, kind of this thing really interesting continuation of different types of security threats between just the the local kid who's just trying to do it because it's fun versus, you know, competitive stuff where people are trying to take out their competitors versus nation states and nation states being, um, you know, kind of driving these attacks. But the ransom, the ransom where we've seen before, but it seems to be increasing in frequency. Maybe we're just hearing about it. What's special about ransom, where as a specific type of security threat. >>So I started this practice about five years ago, and at that point, ransom or was just barely a blip, it was really about destruction and the way that we talk about it in the cybersecurity spaces. There's this triad, these three components of our data that we're trying to protect. So one of those is confidentiality, and that traces back to the attacks you're talking about. That's when somebody steals your data. You don't want them to do that. That breaks the confidentiality of the data. And that's really where the cybersecurity controls kind of grew up around, that you didn't want credit cards, intellectual property, healthcare information. And that's still a problem with ransom, where they're affecting the availability of the data or the integrity of the data. And those were the other two prongs that go with confidentiality. And so these attacks. That's why they feel different. Their impact in your ability to access the data, which in many cases can shut a business down. There have been headlines over the last couple of months. Some businesses that really were closed off for components of their business that were shut down, and it's because they didn't have their data or their systems, and then eventually they either found a way to recover them. Or perhaps in many cases, the speculation is they paid the ransom to get the data back, >>right. And of course, the problem with ever paying a ransom, um, is that you don't necessarily know you're going to get the data back. That you may just be encouraging them to hit you again. Eso paying the ransom is is not necessarily the best solution. And then then, in talking about this thing, turns out that in fact, not only may it not be the right solution, you may be breaking the law. This is a pretty interesting thing. I had no idea that there's really laws dictating, you know, I guess responding to a criminal threat. What? Where does that go? What's that from? >>Yeah, that's we've talked about this for a while. But it wasn't until about two weeks ago that some information was released from the Department of Treasury. So the idea here is that every not every country, many countries, the US among them have lists of countries and organizations that you can't do business with. So essentially a prohibited or sanctions list. And, as it turns out, many of the ransomware bad actors and Jeff is actually real name of one of them evil court. It sounds like a movie or a book, but that's one of the ransomware bad actors there on those lists. So if you get attacked by an organization that's on the list and you pay them. You have now completed a transaction with a prohibited entity and you're subject to potential sanctions. There was a lot written about this being a new law, or the US came up with this law, and that's not the case. The laws have been on the books for a while. It was the Department of Treasury, kind of issuing some guidance, just nudging people. Hey, by the way, you shouldn't be doing this and some of the research I've done a lot of countries have these laws. So while it's just the US that came out with this advisory, which was very public and certainly a big wake up call, these laws exist in a lot of other countries. So organizations really need to be prepared for what they're going to do if they get hit with the Ransomware attack. Not really counting on paying the ransom for the reasons that you said, Plus, it may be against the law. >>And just to make sure I understand you, it's against the law because you're effectively doing business by having a financial transaction with one of these, prohibited either organizations or they're in a prohibited country complete. >>That's correct Yeah, mostly about the organization, um, and then an interesting component of this and we won't get into too much of the weeds on the legal side. But the law is actually a strict liability. So that means it doesn't matter whether you knew or should have known that the entity was on a prohibited list. The mere fact of having that transaction makes you liable. And then the way that the the regulations are written, you can't get someone else to do your dirty work for you. So if you are facilitating that transaction anyway, you may be running afoul of those laws. >>Jesus. One more thing to worry about where you're trying to get business. You're trying to get your business back up and running, but specifically with with with ransomware and why it's different. I mean, there's been business continuity, planning forever. You know, you guys have backup and recovery solutions. Uh, you know, there's so much effort around that What's different here? Is it just because of the time in which you have to respond the availability of those backups toe to come back and get in production? What makes Ransomware so special from a business continuity perspective besides the fact that you're not allowed to pay him because it might be breaking the law. >>Ah, lot, You hit on a couple things there. So we've known forever that with D R. Disaster recovery One of the major things you're doing there is your replicating data quickly so that if you lose sight A you can pop up its site B With ransomware, you're replicating the corrupted data, so you lose that with backups. The bad guys know, just like you mentioned that if you have a backup, you could use that to recover. So they are more frequently now gathering their credentials and attacking the backup. So many cases we see the backups being deleted or otherwise destroyed. And that's really where we have focused with our power. Protect cyber recovery solution is creating a new, extra offline air gapped copy of the most critical applications. That's not going to be susceptible to the attack or the follow up attack that deletes the data. >>So let's jump into that a little bit, um, in a little bit more detailed. So this is a special solution, really targeted, um, as a defense against Ransomware because of the special attributes that ransom where, uh, e guess threatens threatens or the fact that they they also go after your backup in recovery at the same time, knowing you're gonna use that to basically lower the value of their ransom attack. That's crazy. >>Yeah, they're smart. You know, these these Attackers air smart. There's billions of dollars at stake. E think organizations like Evil Corp estimates are they could be making hundreds of millions of dollars. So they're they're not even small businesses. They're almost industries unto themselves. They have advanced tactics, They're leveraging capabilities, and they have. They have products, essentially. So when you think about your production data, your backups, your disaster recovery, those air, all in environments, that they're not accessible on the Internet. But that's where you're doing business. So there is access there. There's employees that have access, and the bad guys find ways to get in through spear phishing attacks, where they're sending emails that look like they're from somebody else and they get a foothold. Once they have that foothold, they can leverage that access to get throughout that production environment. They have access to that data, and they deleted with cyber recovery. What we're doing is we're creating a vaulted environment that's offline. They can't get there from from where they are, so they can't get access to that data. We lock it down, we analyze it, we make sure that it's good and then this happens automatically and day over day. So you've always got that copy of data. If your worst case scenario develops and you lose your production environment, that happens. You've got this copy of data for your most critical applications. You don't want to copy everything in there, but you can use to actually recover and that recover capability. Jeff is one of the pillars of a cyber security structure, so we focus a lot, kind of like you said before. What's different about these attacks? We focus a lot on protecting data and detecting bad guys. This is the recover capability that is part of all these frameworks, >>right? So there's a lot to unpack there before we get into the recovery. And kinda actually, why don't we just start there and then I want to get into the air gap because that's a great That's a great thing to dig in on the recovery what's kind of your targeted s l A Is it based on the size of the application? Um, is it based on on, you know, a different level of service. I mean, what is what is the hope? If I buy into this this solution that I can get my recovery and get back into business if I choose, not toe to pay these guys? What? What does it? What does that kind of look like? >>Most of the time, we're providing a product that our customers are deploying, and then we have some partners that will deployed as a service to, so the SLS may vary, but what we're targeting is a very secure environment, and you can look at how it's architected and think about the technologies. If it's properly operated, you can't get there. You can't get to the data. So the points that we're really looking at is how frequently do we want to update that data? So in other words, how much data can you afford to lose? And then how long will it take you to recover? And both of those? You can leverage the technologies to shorten those up to kind of your requirements. So loosely speaking, the in the shorter you make the time may cost you a little bit more money, a little bit more effort. But you can tighten those up pretty much what your requirements are going to be, >>right? Right? And then let's talk about air gaps because air gaps. That means something very, very specific. It literally means classically right, an air gap. There is a space in between these systems until electrons learn how to jump. Um, they're they're they're physically separated. Um, but that's harder and harder to do, right, because everything is now a P I based, and everything is an app that's based on a bunch of other APS, and there's calls and there's, you know, everything is so interconnected now. But you talked about something specifically said, an automated air gap. And you also said that you know, we're putting this data where it is not connected for some period of time. So I wonder if you could explain a little bit more detail how that works, how it's usually configured, um t to reintroduce an air gap into this crazy connected world. >>Yeah, it's kind of going backward to go forward in a lot of ways. When we're careful about the term, we'll use the term logical air gap because you're right, Jeff on Air Gap is there's a gap, and what we're doing is we're manipulating that air gap in a way that most of the time that data are are safe. Data are vaulted, data is on the other side of the air gap, so you can't get there. But we'll bring it up in air. Gap will logically enable that air gap so that there is a connection which enables us to update the data that's in the vault, and then we'll bring that connection back down. And the way that we've architected the solution is that even when it's enabled like that, we've minimized the capability to get into the vault. So, really, if you're a bad actor, if you know everything that's going on, you might be able to prevent the update. But you can't get into the vault unless you're physically there. And, of course, we put some controls on that so that even insiders are very limited what they can do if they get inside the vault and the A. P. T s, the advanced persistent threats. People who are coming from other countries. Since they're not physically there, they can't access that data. >>That's good. So it's on its off, but it's usually off most of the time, so the bad guys can't get across there. >>Yeah, and again it's It's important that even when it's on it za minimal exposure there. So you think about our triad, the confidentiality, integrity, availability. You know, we're blocking them from getting in so they can maybe do a denial of service type of attack. But that's it. They can't get into break into the vault and break things and destroy the data like they would in production. >>I want to shift gears a little bit gym, and I've I've gone to our essay, I think, for the last three or four years of fact, I think it was the last big live event we did in 2020 before everything came to a screeching halt. And, you know, one of the things I find interesting about the security industry is this one of these opportunities for cooperative Shin um within the security industry that even though you might work for a company that competes with another company. You know there's opportunities to work with your peers at other companies. So you have more of a unified front against the bad guys as well as learn from what's going on. Uh, with some of the other you know, people. So you can learn from the from the attacks that they're surfacing. There's interesting, uh, organization called Sheltered Harbor that it came across and doing research for this. You guys have joined it. It was basically it looks like it was built around 100 30. This this article is from earlier in the years. Probably groaning is from February 130 participating financial institutions, which collectively hold 72% of all deposit accounts and 71% of all U. S retail brokerage assets. It's a big organization focused on security, Del joined not as a financial institution but as a vendor. I wonder if you can share what this organizations all about. Why did you guys join and what? Where you see some of the benefits both for you as well as your customers? >>Yeah, there's a lot there, Jeff. I've been part of that process for a little bit over two years and kicked it off after we identified. Sheltered Harbor is an organization that we wanted to work with. So, as you said, founded by some of the banks and credit unions and other financial institutions in the US, and what's unique about it is it's designed to protect the U. S. Financial system and consumer confidence. It's not actually designed to protect the bank. So of course, that's an outcome there if you're protecting consumer confidence than it's better for the banks. But that's really the goal. And so it's a standards based organization that looked at the problem of what happens if a bank it's attacked, what happens to the customers. So they actually came up with the specifications, which follows so closely to what we do with cyber recovery. They identified important data. They built requirements, not technologies, but capabilities that a vault would need to have to protect that data. And then the process is to recover that data if an event occurred. So we talked to the team for a while. We're very proud of what we've been able to accomplish with them is the only solution provider in their advisory program, and the work that we've done with the power protect cyber recovery solution. We have some more news coming out. I'm not permitted toe announce it yet. It's pretty soon, so stay tuned, and it's just been a really great initiative for us to work with, and the team over there is fantastic. >>So I just one or two. If you can share your thoughts as as the role of security has changed over the last several years from, you know, kind of a perimeter based point of view and you know, protection and walls and, uh, firewalls and and and all these things which is completely broken down now to more of a integrated security approach and baking security into your data to your encryption to your applications, your access devices, etcetera and really integrating security more into the broader flow of product development and and delivery and and how that's impacted the security of the of the customers and impacted professionals like you that are trying to look down the road and get ahead of the next. You know, kind of two or three bad things that are coming. How is that security posture really benefited everybody out there? >>It gets a really difficult problem that we just keep working at it again. We don't have a goal, because if we're targeting here, the threat actors is a bad actors. They're gonna be here. I was reading an article today about how they're already the bad actors already employing machine learning to improve what they're doing and how they target their phishing attacks and things like that. So thinking about things like security by design is great. We have millions billions of devices, and if we start from the ground up that those devices have security built in, it makes the rest of the job a lot easier. But that whole integration process is really important to I mentioned before the recovery capability and protect and detect Well, if you look at the nice cybersecurity framework has five pillars that have capabilities within each one, and we need to keep focusing on our capabilities in those space, we can't do one and not the other. So we do multi factor authentication. But we need to look at encryption for our devices. We need to build from the ground up. We need to have those recover capabilities. It's just kind of a never ending process. But I feel like one of the most important things that we've done over the last year, partly driven by the changes that we've had, is that we're finally recognizing that cyber security is a business issue. It's not a nightie issue. So if your digital and your assets are digital, how can you confine this to a nightie group? It's It's the business. It's risk. Let's understand what risk is acceptable cover the risk that isn't and treated like a business process that it ISS. >>That's great, because because I always often wonder, you know, if you think of it as an insurance problem, you know, then you're gonna be in trouble because you can't You can't just lock everything down, right? You gotta you gotta do business. And you always think of the, you know, ships or safest, uh, at harbor. But that's not what ships are built for, right? You can't just lock everything down, but if you take it more of a business approach, so you're you're measuring investments and risk and putting dollar amounts on it. Then you can start to figure out how much should I invest in security because you can't spend ah, 100% of your revenue on security. What is the happy medium? How do you decide and how do you apply that investment where, you know, it's kind of a portfolio strategy problem >>it is. And and that's one of the areas that again my five years in the building, the practice we've seen organizations start to move to. So you want to protect your most important assets the best. And then there are things that you still want to protect, but you can't afford the time, the budget, the operational expense of protecting everything. So let's understand what really drives this business if I'm a law firm might be my billion and document management systems and health care. It's a electronic medical record and manufacturing the manufacturing systems. So let's protect the most important things the best and then kind of moved down from there. We have to understand what those systems are before we can actually protect them. And that's where the business really needs to work more closely. And they are with the I T teams with cyber security teams, >>right, and like, I like a lot of big problems, right? You gotta break it down. You gotta You gotta prioritize. You gotta, you know, start just knocking off what's important and not so overwhelmed by, you know, trying to protect everything to the same degree. This is not practical, and it's not not a good investment. >>That's exactly the case. And there's the ongoing discussions about shortage of people in the cybersecurity space, which there are. But there are things that we can do that to really maximize what those people do, get them to focus on the higher level capabilities and let the tools do some of the things that the tools air good at. >>Right. So, you know, you triggered one last point and we'll wrap on this, but I'll give you the last word. Aziz, you look forward. Two things like automation and two things like artificial intelligence and machine learning that you can apply to make those professionals more effective on automate some stuff. Um, how do you see that evolving? And does that give you big smiles or frowns as you think about your use of AI in a nml versus the bad guys, they have some of the same tools as well. >>They dio and look, we have to use those to keep up. I'll give you example with with power, protect cyber recovery. We already use AI and ML to analyze the data that's in our vault. So how do you know that the data is good? We're not gonna have somebody in the vault looking through the files by leveraging those capabilities. We could give a verdict on that data. And so you know that it's good. I think we we have to continue to be careful that we understand what the tools are. We deploy them in the right way. You can't deploy tool just to deploy honor because it's hot or because it's interesting that goes back to understanding the systems that we need to protect the risks that we can accept or perhaps cover with insurance and the risks that gosh, we really can't accept. We need to make sure that the business continues to operate here, so I think it's great. Um, the communities have really come together. There's more information sharing than ever has gone on. And that's really one of our big weapons against the bad actors. >>All right, Well, Jim, thank you so much for sharing your insight. I think your job security is locked in for the foreseeable future. We didn't even get into five G and I o t and ever increasing attack, surface and sophistication of the bad guys. So thank you for doing what you do and helping keep us safe. Keep your data safe and keeping our companies running. >>Thank you for the opportunity. >>Alright, He's Jim. Mom. Jeff. Thanks for watching the cubes. Continuous coverage of Dell Technology World 2020. The Digital Experience. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.

Published Date : Oct 21 2020

SUMMARY :

World Digital Experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Thanks for getting all that out. So I'm curious if you can talk about that relationship between yeah, and you have to work up from there based on the organization's risk profile. and even the new normal will have some type of a hybrid relationship with with, you know, I think organizations have done an amazing job when you think about So we've seen, you know, kind of this thing really interesting And that's really where the cybersecurity controls kind of grew up around, that you didn't want credit cards, And of course, the problem with ever paying a ransom, um, is that you don't necessarily Not really counting on paying the ransom for the reasons that you said, Plus, it may be against the law. And just to make sure I understand you, it's against the law because you're effectively doing business by having a financial the regulations are written, you can't get someone else to do your dirty work for you. Is it just because of the time in which you have to respond the availability so that if you lose sight A you can pop up its site B With ransomware, as a defense against Ransomware because of the special attributes that ransom where, So when you think about your production data, Um, is it based on on, you know, a different level of service. So loosely speaking, the in the shorter you make the time may cost you a little bit more money, and everything is an app that's based on a bunch of other APS, and there's calls and there's, you know, data is on the other side of the air gap, so you can't get there. So it's on its off, but it's usually off most of the time, so the bad guys can't get across So you think about our triad, the confidentiality, integrity, availability. So you can learn from the from the attacks that they're surfacing. And so it's a standards based organization that looked at the problem several years from, you know, kind of a perimeter based point of view and you know, But I feel like one of the most important things that we've done over the last year, And you always think of the, you know, ships or safest, So you want to protect your most You gotta, you know, start just knocking off what's important and not so overwhelmed by, in the cybersecurity space, which there are. And does that give you big smiles or frowns as you think about your So how do you know that the data is good? So thank you for doing what you do and helping keep We'll see you next time.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

JimPERSON

0.99+

Jim ShookPERSON

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

Department of TreasuryORGANIZATION

0.99+

Sheltered HarborORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

Evil CorpORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

72%QUANTITY

0.99+

Del TechnologyORGANIZATION

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

February 130DATE

0.99+

millionsQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

two prongsQUANTITY

0.99+

71%QUANTITY

0.99+

mid MarchDATE

0.99+

678 monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

Atlanta, GeorgiaLOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

AzizPERSON

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.98+

JesusPERSON

0.98+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.98+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.98+

U. SLOCATION

0.98+

billions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.97+

over two yearsQUANTITY

0.97+

five pillarsQUANTITY

0.96+

Two thingsQUANTITY

0.96+

hundreds of millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.95+

SECORGANIZATION

0.95+

each oneQUANTITY

0.95+

three componentsQUANTITY

0.94+

DelPERSON

0.94+

Dell Technology World 2020EVENT

0.94+

pandemicEVENT

0.93+

billions of devicesQUANTITY

0.92+

OneQUANTITY

0.91+

one last pointQUANTITY

0.9+

last couple of monthsDATE

0.89+

about two weeks agoDATE

0.89+

five years agoDATE

0.88+

four yearsQUANTITY

0.86+

three badQUANTITY

0.83+

30DATE

0.76+

U.ORGANIZATION

0.76+

around 100QUANTITY

0.73+

Technologies World 2020EVENT

0.69+

USORGANIZATION

0.68+

aboutDATE

0.68+

One more thingQUANTITY

0.67+

about twoQUANTITY

0.61+

ransomwareTITLE

0.58+

threeQUANTITY

0.57+

yearsDATE

0.56+

lastDATE

0.51+

DellORGANIZATION

0.48+

RansomwareEVENT

0.48+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.47+

Paul Perez, Dell Technologies and Kit Colbert, VMware | Dell Technologies World 2020


 

>> Narrator: From around the globe, it's theCUBE! With digital coverage of Dell Technologies World Digital Experience. Brought to you by Dell Technologies. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeffrey here with theCUBE coming to you from our Palo Altos studios with continuing coverage of the Dell Technology World 2020, The Digital Experience. We've been covering this for over 10 years. It's virtual this year, but still have a lot of great content, a lot of great announcements, and a lot of technology that's being released and talked about. So we're excited. We're going to dig a little deep with our next two guests. First of all we have Paul Perez. He is the SVP and CTO of infrastructure solutions group for Dell technologies. Paul's great to see you. Where are you coming in from today? >> Austin, Texas. >> Austin Texas Awesome. And joining him returning to theCUBE on many times, Kit Colbert. He is the Vice President and CTO of VMware cloud for VMware Kit great to see you as well. Where are you joining us from? >> Yeah, thanks for having me again. I'm here in San Francisco. >> Awesome. So let's jump into it and talk about project Monterrey. You know, it's funny I was at Intel back in the day and all of our passwords used to go out and they became like the product names. It's funny how these little internal project names get a life of their own and this is a big one. And, you know, we had Pat Gelsinger on a few weeks back at VM-ware talking about how significant this is and kind of this evolution within the VMware cloud development. And, you know, it's kind of past Kubernetes and past Tanzu and past project Pacific and now we're into project Monterey. So first off, let's start with Kit, give us kind of the basic overview of what is project Monterey. >> Yep. Yeah, well, you're absolutely right. What we did last year, we announced project Pacific, which was really a fundamental rethinking of VMware cloud foundation with Kubernetes built in right. Kubernetes is still a core to core part of the architecture and the idea there was really to better support modern applications to enable developers and IT operations to come together to work collaboratively toward modernizing a company's application fleet. And as you look at companies starting to be successful, they're starting to run these modern applications. What you found is that the hardware architecture itself needed to evolve, needed to update, to support all the new requirements brought on by these modern apps. And so when you're looking at project Monterey, it's exactly that it's a rethinking of the VMware cloud foundation, underlying hardware architecture. And so you think about a project model or excuse me, product Pacific is really kind of the top half if you will, Kubernetes consumption experiences great for applications. Project Monterey comes along as the second step in that journey, really being the bottom half, fundamentally rethinking the hardware architecture and leveraging SmartNic technology to do that. >> It's pretty interesting, Paul, you know, there's a great shift in this whole move from, you know, infrastructure driving applications to applications driving infrastructure. And then we're seeing, you know, obviously the big move with big data. And again, I think as Pat talked about in his interview with NVIDIA being at the right time, at the right place with the right technology and this, you know, kind of groundswell of GPU, now DPU, you know, helping to move those workloads beyond just kind of where the CPU used to do all the work, this is even, you know, kind of taking it another level you guys are the hardware guys and the solutions guys, as you look at this kind of continuing evolution, both of workloads as well as their infrastructure, how does this fit in? >> Yeah, well, how all this fit it in is modern applications and modern workloads, require a modern infrastructure, right? And a Kit was talking about the infrastructure overlay. That VMware is awesome at that all being, I was coming at this from the emerging data centric workloads, and some of the implications for that, including Phillip and diversity has ever been used for computing. The need to this faculty could be able to combine maybe resources together, as opposed to trying to shoehorn something into a mechanical chassis. And, and if you do segregate, you have to be able to compose on demand. And when you start comparing those, we realized that we were humping it up on our conversion trajectory and we started to team up and partner. >> So it's interesting because part of the composable philosophy, if you will, is to, you know, just to break the components of compute store and networking down to a small pieces as possible, and then you can assemble the right amount when you need it to attack a particular problem. But when you're talking about it's a whole different level of, of bringing the right hardware to bear for the solution. When you talk about SmartNics and you talk about GPS in DPS data processing units, you're now starting to offload and even FPG is that some of these other things offload a lot of work from the core CPU to some of these more appropriate devices that said, how do people make sure that the right application ends up on the right infrastructure? This is that I'm, if it's appropriate using more of a, of a Monterey based solution versus more of a traditional one, depending on the workload, how is that going to get all kind of sorted out and, and routed within the actual cloud infrastructure itself? That was probably back to you a Kit? >> Yeah, sure. So I think it's important to understand kind of what a smart NIC is and how it works in order to answer that question, because what we're really doing is to kind of jump right to it. I guess it's, you know, giving an API into the infrastructure and this is how we're able to do all the things that you just mentioned, but what does a SmartNic? Well, SmartNic is essentially a NIC with a general purpose CPU on it, really a whole CPU complex, in fact, kind of a whole system on server right there on that, on that Nic. And so what that enables is a bunch of great things. So first of all, to your point, we can do a lot of offload. We can actually run ESX. >> SXI on that. Nic, we can take a lot of the functionality that we were doing before on the main server CPU, things like network virtualization, storage, virtualization, security functionality, we can move that all off on the Nic. And it makes a lot of sense because really what we're doing when we're doing all those things is really looking at different sort of IO data paths. You know, as, as the network traffic comes through looking at doing automatic load balancing firewall and for security, delivering storage, perhaps remotely. And so the NIC is actually a perfect place to place all of these functionalities, right? You can not only move it off the core server CPU, but you can get a lot better performance cause you're now right there on the data path. So I think that's the first really key point is that you can get that offload, but then once you have all of that functionality there, then you can start doing some really amazing things. And this ability to expose additional virtual devices onto the PCI bus, this is another great capability of a SmartNic. So when you plug it in physically into the motherboard, it's a Nic, right. You can see that. And when it starts up, it looks like a Nic to the motherboard, to the system, but then via software, you can have it expose additional devices. It could look like a storage controller, or it could look like an FPGA look really any sort of device. And you can do that. Not only for the local machine where it's plugged in, but potentially remote machines as well with the right sorts of interconnects. So what this creates is a whole new sort of cluster architecture. And that's why we're really so excited about it because you got all these great benefits in terms of offload performance improvement, security improvement, but then you get this great ability to get very dynamic, just aggregation. And composability. >> So Kit, how much of it is the routing of the workload to the right place, right? That's got the right amount of say, it's a super data intensive once a lot of GPU versus actually better executing the operation. Once it gets to the place where it's going to run. >> Yeah. It's a bit of a combination actually. So the powerful thing about it is that in a traditional world, where are you want an application? You know, the server that you run it, that app can really only use the local devices there. Yes, there is some newer stuff like NVMe over fabric where you can remote certain types of storage capabilities, but there's no real general purpose solution to that. Yet that generally speaking, that application is limited to the local hardware devices. Well, the great part about what we're doing with Monterey and with the SmartNic technology is that we can now dynamically remote or expose remote devices from other hosts. And so wherever that application runs matters a little bit less now, in a sense that we can give it the right sorts of hardware it needs in order to operate. You know, if you have, let's say a few machines with a FPGA is normally if you have needed that a Fiji had to run locally, but now can actually run remotely and you can better balance out things like compute requirements versus, you know, specialized Accella Requirements. And so I think what we're looking at is, especially in the context of VMware cloud foundation, is bringing that all together. We can look through the scheduling, figure out what the best host for it to let run on based on all these considerations. And that's it, we are missing, let's say a physical device that needs, well, we can remote that and sort of a deal at that, a missing gap there. >> Right, right. That's great. Paul, I want to go back to you. You just talked about, you know, kind of coming at this problem from a data centric point of view, and you're running infrastructure and you're the poor guy that's got to catch all the ASAM Todd i the giant exponential curves up into the right on the data flow and the data quantity. How is that impacting the way you think about infrastructure and designing infrastructure and changing infrastructure and kind of future proofing infrastructure when, you know, just around the corners, 5g and IOT and, Oh, you ain't seen nothing yet in terms of the data flow. >> Yeah. So I come at this from two angles. One that we talked about briefly is the evolution of the workloads themselves. The other angle, which is just as important is the operating model that customers are wanting to evolve to. And in that context, we thought a lot about how cloud, if an operating model, not necessarily a destination, right? So what I, and when way we laid out, what Kit was talking about is that in data center computing, you have operational control and data plane. Where did data plane run from the optimized solution? GPU's, PGA's, offload engines? And the control plane can run on stuff like it could be safe and are then I'm thinking about SmartNic is back codes have arm boards, so you can implement some data plane and some control plane, and they can also be the gateway. Cause, you know, you've talked about composability, what has been done up until now is early for sprint, right? We're carving out software defined infrastructure out of predefined hardware blocks. What we're talking about is making, you know, a GPUs residents in our fabric consistent memory residence of a fabric NVME over fabric and being able to tile computing topologies on demand to realize and applications intent. And we call that intent based computer. >> Right. Well, just, and to follow up on that too, as the, you know, cloud is an attitude or as an operating model or whatever you want to say, you know, not necessarily a place or a thing has changed. I mean, how has that had to get you to shift your infrastructure approach? Cause you've got to support, you know, old school, good old data centers. We've got, you know, some stuff running on public clouds. And then now you've got hybrid clouds and you have multi clouds, right. So we know, you know, you're out in the field that people have workloads running all over the place. So, but they got to control it and they've got compliance issues and they got a whole bunch of other stuff. So from your point of view, as you see the desire for more flexibility, the desire for more infrastructure centric support for the workloads that I want to buy and the increasing amount of those that are more data centric, as we move to hopefully more data driven decisions, how's it changed your strategy. And what does it mean to partner and have a real nice formal relationship with the folks over at VMR or excuse me, VMware? >> Well, I think that regardless of how big a company is, it's always prudent. As I say, when I approached my job, right, architecture is about balance and efficiency and it's about reducing contention. And we like to leverage industry R and D, especially in cases where one plus one equals two, right? In the case of, project Monterey for example, one of the collaboration areas is in improving the security model and being able to provide more air gap isolation, especially when you consider that enterprise wants to behave as service providers is concerned or to their companies. And therefore this is important. And because of that, I think that there's a lot of things that we can do between VMware and Dell lending hardware, and for example, assets like NSX and a different way that will give customers higher scalability and performance and more control, you know, beyond VMware and Dell EMC i think that we're partnering with obviously the SmartNic vendors, cause they're smart interprets and the gateway to those that are clean. They're not really analysis, but also companies that are innovating in data center computing, for example, NVIDIA. >> Right. Right. >> And I think that what we're seeing is while, you know, ambivalent has done an awesome job of targeting their capability, AIML type of workloads, what we realized this applications today depend on platform services, right. And up until recently, those platform services have been debases messaging PI active directory, moving forward. I think that within five years, most applications will depend on some form of AIML service. So I can see an opportunity to go mainstream with this >> Right. Right. Well, it's great. You bring up in NVIDIA and I'm just going to quote one of Pat's lines from, from his interview. And he talked about Jensen from NVIDIA actually telling Pat, Hey Pat, I think you're thinking too small. I love it. You know, let's do the entire AI landscape together and make AI and enterprise class workloads from being more in TANZU, you know, first class citizens. So I, I love the fact, you know, Pat's been around a long time industry veteran, but still, kind of accepted the challenge from Jensen to really elevate AI and machine learning via GPS to first class citizen status. And the other piece, obviously this coming up is ed. So I, you know, it's a nice shot of a, of adrenaline and Kit I wonder if you can share your thoughts on that, you know, in kind of saying, Hey, let's take it up a notch, a significant notch by leveraging a whole another class of compute power within these solutions. >> Yeah. So, I mean, I'll, I'll go real quick. I mean, I, it's funny cause like not many people really ever challenged Pat to say he doesn't think big enough, cause usually he's always blown us away with what he wants to do next, but I think it's, I think it's a, you know, it's good though. It's good to keep us on our toes and push us a bit. Right. All of us within the industry. And so I think a couple of things you have to go back to your previous point around this is like cloud as a model. I think that's exactly what we're doing is trying to bring cloud as a model, even on prem. And it's a lot of these kinds of core hardware architecture capabilities that we do enable the biggest one in my mind, just being enabling an API into the hardware. So the applications can get what they need. And going back to Paul's point, this notion of these AI and ML services, you know, they have to be rooted in the hardware, right? We know that in order for them to be performing for them to run, to support what our customers want to do, we need to have that deeply integrated into the hardware all the way up. But that also becomes a software problem. Once we got the hardware solved, once we get that architecture locked in, how can we as easy as possible, as seamlessly as possible, deliver all those great capabilities, software capabilities. And so, you know, you look at what we've done with the NVIDIA partnership, things around the NVIDIA GPU cloud, and really bringing that to bear. And so then you start having this, this really great full stack integration all the way from the hardware, very powerful hardware architecture that, you know, again, driven by API, the infrastructure software on top of that. And then all these great AI tools, tool chains, capabilities with things like the NVIDIA NGC. So that's really, I think where the vision's going. And we got a lot of the basic parts there, but obviously a lot more work to do going forward. >> I would say that, you know, initially we had dream, we wanted this journey to happen very fast and initially we're baiting infrastructure services. So there's no contention with applications, customer full workload applications, and also in enabling how productive it is to get the data over time, have to have sufficient control over a wide area. there's an opportunity to do something like that to make sure that you think about the probation from bare metal vms (conversation fading) environments are way more dynamic and more spreadable. Right. And they expect hardware. It could be as dynamic and compostable to suit their needs. And I think that's where we're headed. >> Right. So let me, so let me throw a monkey wrench in, in terms of security, right? So now this thing is much more flexible. It's much more software defined. How is that changing the way you think about security and basic security and throughout the stack go to you first, Paul. >> Yeah. Yeah. So like it's actually enables a lot of really powerful things. So first of all, from an architecture and implementation standpoint, you have to understand that we're really running two copies of VXI on each physical server. Now we've got the one running on the X86 side, just like normal, and now we've got one running on the SmartNIC as well. And so, as I mentioned before, we can move a lot of that networking security, et cetera, capabilities off to the SmartNic. And so what does this going toward as what we call a zero trust security architecture, this notion of having really defense in depth at many different layers and many different areas while obviously the hypervisor and the virtualization layer provides a really strong level of security. even when we were doing it completely on the X86 side, now that we're running on a SmartNic that's additional defense in depth because the X86 ESX doesn't really know it doesn't have direct access to the ESX. I run it on the SmartNic So the ESXI running on the SmartNic, it can be this kind of more well defended position. Moreover, now that we're running the security functionality is directly on the data path. In the SmartNic. We can do a lot more with that. We can run a lot deeper analysis, can talk about AI and ML, bring a lot of those capabilities to bear here to actually improve the security profile. And so finally I'd say this notion of kind of distributed security as well, that you don't, that's what I want to have these individual points on the physical network, but I actually distribute the security policies and enforcement to everywhere where a server's running, I everywhere where a SmartNic is, and that's what we can do here. And so it really takes a lot of what we've been doing with things like NSX, but now connects it much more deeply into hardware, allowing for better performance and security. >> A common attack method is to intercept the boot of the server physical server. And, you know, I'm actually very proud of our team because the us national security agency recently published a white paper on best practices for secure group. And they take our implementation across and secure boot as the reference standard. >> Right? Moving forward, imagine an environment that even if you gain control of the server, that doesn't allow you to change bios or update it. So we're moving the root of trust to be in that air gap, domain that Kit talked about. And that gives us a way more capability for zero across the operations. Right. >> Right, right. Paul, I got to ask you, I had Sam bird on the other day, your peer who runs the P the PC group. >> I'm telling you, he is not a peer He's a little bit higher up. >> Higher than you. Okay. Well, I just promoted you so that's okay. But, but it's really interesting. Cause we were talking about, it was literally like 10 years ago, the death of the PC article that came out when, when Apple introduced the tablet and, you know, he's talked about what phenomenal devices that PCs continue to be and evolve. And then it's just funny how, now that dovetails with this whole edge conversation, when people don't necessarily think of a PC as a piece of the edge, but it is a great piece of the edge. So from an infrastructure point of view, you know, to have that kind of presence within the PCs and kind of potentially that intelligence and again, this kind of whole another layer of interaction with the users and an opportunity to define how they work with applications and prioritize applications. I just wonder if you can share how nice it is to have that kind of in your back pocket to know that you've got a whole another, you know, kind of layer of visibility and connection with the users beyond just simply the infrastructure. >> So I actually, within the company we've developed within a framework that we call four edge multicloud, right. Core data centers and enterprise edge IOP, and then off premise. it is a multicloud world. And, and within that framework, we consider our client solutions group products to be part of the yes. And we see a lot of benefit. I'll give an example about a healthcare company that wants to develop real time analytics, regardless of whether it's on a laptop or maybe move into a backend data center, right? Whether it's at a hospital clinic or a patient's home, it gives us a broader innovation surface and a little sooner to get actually the, a lot of people may not appreciate that the most important function within Centene, I considered to be the experienced design thing. So being able to design user flows and customer experience looked at all of use is a variable. >> That's great. That's great. So we're running out of time. I want to give you each the last word you both been in this business for a long time. This is brand new stuff, right? Container aren't new, Kubernetes is still relatively new and exciting. And project Pacific was relatively new and now project Monterrey, but you guys are, you know, you're, multi-decade veterans in this thing. as you look forward, what does this moment represent compared to some of the other shifts that we've seen in IT? You know, generally, but you know, kind of consumption of compute and you know, kind of this application centric world that just continues to grow. I mean, as a software is eating everything, we know it, you guys live it every day. What is, where are we now? And you know, what do you see? Maybe I don't want to go too far out, but the next couple of years within the Monterey framework. And then if you have something else, generally you can add as well. Paul, why don't we start with you? >> Well, I think on a personal level, ingenuity aside I have a long string of very successful endeavor in my career when I came back couple years ago, one of the things that I told Jeff, our vice chairman is a big canvas and I intend to paint my masterpiece and I think, you know, Monterey and what we're doing in support of Monterey is also part of that. I think that you will see, you will see our initial approach focus on, on coordinator. I can tell you that you know how to express it. And we know also how to express even in a multicloud world. So I'm very excited and I know that I'm going to be busy for the next few years. (giggling) >> A Kit to you. >> Yeah. So, you know, it's funny you talk to people about SmartNic and especially those folks that have been around for awhile. And what you hear is like, Hey, you know, people were talking about SmartNic 10 years ago, 20 years ago, that sort of thing. Then they kind of died off. So what's different now. And I think the big difference now is a few things, you know, first of all, it's the core technology of sworn and has dramatically improved. We now have a powerful software infrastructure layer that can take advantage of it. And, you know, finally, you know, applications have a really strong need for it, again, with all the things we've talked about, the need for offload. So I think there's some real sort of fundamental shifts that have happened over the past. Let's say decade that have driven the need for this. And so this is something that I believe strongly as here to last, you know, both ourselves at VMware, as well as Dell are making a huge bet on this, but not only that, and not only is it good for customers, it's actually good for all the operators as well. So whether this is part of VCF that we deliver to customers for them to operate themselves, just like they always have, or if it's part of our own cloud solutions, things like being more caught on Dell, this is going to be a core part about how we deliver our cloud services and infrastructure going forward. So we really do believe this is kind of a foundational transition that's taking place. And as we talked about, there is a ton of additional innovation that's going to come out of it. So I'm really, really excited for the next few years, because I think we're just at the start of a very long and very exciting journey. >> Awesome. Well, thank you both for spending some time with us and sharing the story and congratulations. I'm sure a whole bunch of work for, from a whole bunch of people in, into getting to getting where you are now. And, and as you said, Paul, the work is barely just begun. So thanks again. All right. He's Paul's He's Kit. I'm Jeff. You're watching the cubes, continuing coverage of Dell tech world 2020, that digital experience. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (Upbeat music)

Published Date : Oct 21 2020

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Dell Technologies. coming to you from our Palo Altos studios Kit great to see you as well. I'm here in San Francisco. And, you know, it's of the top half if you will, and this, you know, kind And when you start comparing those, how is that going to get So first of all, to your point, really key point is that you can Once it gets to the place You know, the server that you run it, How is that impacting the way is making, you know, how has that had to get you you know, beyond VMware and Dell EMC i think Right. seeing is while, you know, So I, I love the fact, you know, and really bringing that to bear. sure that you think about the the stack go to you first, is directly on the data And, you know, server, that doesn't allow you Sam bird on the other day, He's a little bit higher up. the tablet and, you know, of the yes. of compute and you know, that I'm going to be busy for And what you hear is like, Hey, you know, and as you said, Paul, the

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

Paul PerezPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

PaulPERSON

0.99+

Kit ColbertPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

NVIDIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

PatPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

Austin, TexasLOCATION

0.99+

two anglesQUANTITY

0.99+

second stepQUANTITY

0.99+

Pat GelsingerPERSON

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

couple years agoDATE

0.99+

JensenPERSON

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltosLOCATION

0.99+

SmartNicsORGANIZATION

0.98+

MontereyLOCATION

0.98+

MontereyORGANIZATION

0.98+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.98+

20 years agoDATE

0.98+

10 years agoDATE

0.98+

ESXTITLE

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.98+

VCFORGANIZATION

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

eachQUANTITY

0.98+

over 10 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

VMRORGANIZATION

0.97+

Austin TexasLOCATION

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

this yearDATE

0.97+

NSXORGANIZATION

0.97+

FirstQUANTITY

0.96+

X86COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.96+

two guestsQUANTITY

0.95+

Dell Technology World 2020EVENT

0.95+

two copiesQUANTITY

0.95+

zeroQUANTITY

0.95+

SmartNicORGANIZATION

0.95+

Sam birdPERSON

0.94+

CenteneORGANIZATION

0.94+

each physical serverQUANTITY

0.92+

SmartNicTITLE

0.92+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.92+

VMware cloudORGANIZATION

0.9+

PacificORGANIZATION

0.9+

SmartNicCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.9+

Sam Burd, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World Digital Experience


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Dell Technologies. World Digital Experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Hey, welcome back already, Jeffrey. Here with the Q. Come to you from our Palo Alto studio with our ongoing coverage of Del Tech World 2020. The digital experience Let's jump into a really excited to have our next guest CIA Sam Bird, the president of the Client Solutions Group for Dell. Sam, where you joining us from today? >>Hey, I am joining you live from Austin, Texas. Jeff looks beautiful. All weather? Yeah, its's turning really nice. Uh, nice time to be here in Austin, right? So, >>Sam, let's jump into it. I mean, you, you cover, you know, kind of the heart of what Dell started with which was which was PCs. And, you know, it's funny. A couple days ago, Michael tweeted because he likes to tweet, which is fun. An article that said that the PC officially died today. It's a reference back to an article I had to look at the January 26 2010. Officially, the PC officially died today. >>That >>is so bizarre, and that is not in fact, not true, you guys. We're seeing unprecedented demand, so I wonder if it is You Look back at that. And I'm sure you saw Michaels tweet. What kind of goes through your head? Because we're in a very different space than we were 10 years ago. >>Yeah, I think the world's changed a lot, Jeff from 10 years ago. I got to say, uh, the PC died 10 years ago. It feels pretty good being being dead for 10 years. So I think we actually saw a, you know, still alive and very vibrant. PC. So you think about everything that's happened with Cove it We have seen the PC and people using technology to stay connected, whether it's, you know, working in their business, learning from home, staying connected with other family members. So we'd like to talk about it Is the renaissance of the PC. It kind of this rebirth reemergence of this really good friend that you had has become really core toe how we're getting stuff done in the world today, and we've stayed bullish about the opportunity around the PC. Michaels had that view from, you know, when he started this company, and we've since expanded to many other areas beyond selling PCs. But we continue to be really committed to the value of that technology in people's hands, >>right? So just in defense of the of the article, it was written on the launch of the iPad right, which was a new a new form factor. And, you know, we've seen this proliferation of form factors both within PCs and mobile phones, and you know, the sizes of screens getting bigger and the size of green getting smaller and surface all kinds of different things. So I wonder if you could share, you know, kind of your perspective in, you know, kind of the opportunity that opens up when people are looking for different types of form factors. And then, more importantly, I think now it's horses for courses. So when I'm sitting at my desk, you know, I haven't a big giant XPS with all the ram and GPU and stuff Aiken stuff into it. If I'm going to the airport with a long flight, I want something small and light and easy to carry and what's interesting, I think, with cloud it enables you now to basically have the form factor that you need where you need it for the types of work that you're trying to get done. >>Yeah, I think you're absolutely right. You know, if you if you take that 10 years ago, article to today we have had an enormous amount of innovation in the industry that's made the device is exciting and appealing for how people wanna want to operate. So, you know, we've seen Jeff a shift towards more mobile form factors with cove in. So, um, a commercial space that used to be maybe half desktops, half notebooks is now in the 70% range. More mobile form factors which reflects how people want to use them. You know, they're sitting at home, they need that device to be portable. They wanna go between rooms and home. That's the other thing that we found in some of our, you know, research and work on the spaces. You know, people might want to sit at the kitchen table in the morning in the afternoon. Maybe they're outside. They might have their kids do in school from home and have to be around them part of the day, so they still need a mobile kind of form factor, but it's plugged in. I want full power to run my applications. And, like you said, we will get back to a world with travel and people being mobile. And then you need to dial in the right form factor that has maybe a smaller screen, more portable device. So one of the things that's kept this business vibrant, you know, for the past 10 years and right now is a bigger screen experience is really, really valuable. A keyboard and multiple ways of in putting into devices are valuable, so there's core. Things are great. And then we've got systems that are set up for how people want to use them. You know, we still have designers sitting at home using big desktop workstations because the most powerful thing there times really valuable. There's a right system for how you want to use technology, and I think that that's attendant, you know, an approach we take in our business, and that's what we see in the industry. I think that's what's helped keep it very vibrant and alive. >>I love it, I love it. It is truly that work from anywhere and anywhere as you just defined, could be a whole bunch of things, and it doesn't even mean just at home or just at the coffee shop. That's really interesting. Is you even change locations where you're working within within the home. That really supports that. So, >>you >>know, Cove, it hits light switch moment. Everybody's gotta work from home. So huge, huge pressure there. And now, as you said, you know, we're seven months into it. Still gonna be going on for a little bit while a little while before people go back. Huge, huge boost to your guys business. I'm curious if you can share some thoughts in terms of, you know, now, I I need to kind of project a little bit of that office back to the work from anywhere situation. And, you know, you guys are that you're kind of that edge device that ultimately connects back to the mother ship. >>Yeah, I think it's and that's where we've seen people realized. It's a really valuable device that helps keep them, you know, productive and connected. Um, we have seen it's very interesting of it used to be, you know, pre co vid for Most people work with the location, you know, Post Cove. It it's something you do, and suddenly it's very location agnostic, and we see the world operating that way in the future Jeff of these devices at the edge or need gonna be working in a world where sometimes it makes sense to be in an office. Maybe there's collaboration, other things you need to dio. But we're going to see people working from home working from a coffee shop, working from, you know, anywhere in the world, and we're gonna need to stay connected. In that way, it's enabling a great set of talent. It's enabling people to be where they want, you know, get done what they need to do in their personal lives and then be contributing in a great way, thio to a business. So I think technology plays a huge role in going and getting that done. And to me, the world doesn't just return back to a you know, pre cove in space. But we're now in this. We've learned we can operate in this kind of multi modality world where technology can help keep us connected, collaborating, getting stuff done in some cases more productive than ever before, and it's kind of unleashed this new wave of thinking. I think we will continue to see great creativity on stuff we're putting in our devices to enable that, you know, software applications approaches that are gonna enable that that will really take us forward as we look at the future. >>You know, I'm just curious if you could share, uh, you know, kind of Ah, general breakdown by kind of form factor. What do you see between kind of, you know, I don't know if you split high end desktops and low on desktops and then, you know, kind of laptops and Chromebooks, what's kind of the high level kind of breakdown, and how's that? Is it change significantly over the last several years? And you you just mentioned a boost. You know, during the time of Cove in >>Yeah, we've seen a shift towards notebooks. Now you know much Is the article you you pulled up from 10 years ago? I think the death, the death of the desktop has also been much exaggerated. So we're Maurin, a mode of 70% of the systems that were selling our notebooks 70 to 80% range. It's a little higher, and consumer Andi, that's, you know, 20 points up in the commercial space. So we're seeing, you know, people have valued that kind of portability of systems. You know that, said is we talk through some of the ways people use it. There are great uses for desktops, for people are in the same place where I need ultimate ultimate power and then a z your home. We've seen a little more shift Teoh a suddenly you know, portability. That was really valuable because you had Salesforce's engineers on the road all the time. And I really wanted something that, you know, lasted had great battery life and was really easy to carry around. Suddenly we're in a world plugged in at home like we look at our devices, we've gone. Now more than half of our laptops are basically on is we have intelligence built into our systems. That tunes how battery management is done. Empower Management's done. More than half those systems are now in a mode of all, basically, always on a C. So people are, you know, plugged in all the time. They would like a little more powerful system. So whether they're running, zoom or teams or some other app. Multitasking. It's like there's a, you know, different requirements there. I think that changes Azzawi go forward and we get back to, you know, the notebook. It's like the ultimate design people want is a great big screen. That's super light, and the battery lasts forever. And I'm like that keeps our engineers and designers working every day because that's a really hard, complex thing to solve. And, you know, we're we continue to work and and and push that next forward. Now it's a little more biased to power. Sitting on a desk. We will be back in a world where it's gonna be, Yeah, I want power to sit on the desk, be on a video conference, get work done. But I also need to be able to take that on the road with >>Yeah, I just think, you know, because of the proliferation of online applications, right? And you know so much of our work day no pun intended, you know, is done in all these different cloud based applications, whether its sales force or slack or asana or whether we're, you know, working in in, uh, social media applications or even are you know kind of cloud enabled local applications. You know, a lot of times I find you don't have to carry your device right. E can lead the one device of one location, one of the other. I know it's almost like you pick up exactly where you were when you log back into chrome or you log back into whatever your browser is. If you've got it all configured, you know you don't even need to carry. A lot of times I find it's it's it's really nice. And if I have to check a message on the phone, No, it's a very different way of working, and, uh, I think it's really pretty slick. I do want to get into productivity, which you've talked about a lot. You know, I've always said the best productivity investment anybody could make is a second screen on the desktop. I mean, it's so much more productive to have a second screen the third screen. You go to places like Wall Street and the NASDAQ floor, where time matters and productivity matters, their screens all over the place and you guys are doing a ton of fun stuff with screens. Big giant curve things, and you made an interesting observation in other interviews that now people are consuming their entertainment content via those screens, whether it's an over the top service with Netflix or or whatever. So this this kind of shift to, you know, kind of mawr content consumption as this blend between kind of what you do in your personal life and what you do in your work life, both in terms of time and content, you know, continue to mix so lot of exciting stuff happening in big, beautiful screens. >>Yeah, totally agree, Jeff. And we see you know we've looked at productivity and see boosts with a bigger screen around your system. Same thing with exactly as you describe putting two screens around the system or go to a trading floor and their screens everywhere because it's about the you know, it's about the content that you can consume and the, um, you know, the work that you go get done, and it's a lot more efficient to be able to have multiple screens. Whether it's looking at a presentation and doing a call, you know, a video call for work on on one screen or either side of Ah, screen. And we're seeing people build out that, you know, their home office, their work office. I think that's to me. The, you know, the exciting piece of you think about how technology is arming people to get their job done. Like you can't imagine if you had all the technology taken away from you. You're like, Okay, what am I gonna What am I go do? Like if the internet goes down, I don't quite know how to get go. Be productive here. You know, I go try to find someone who has a landline phone on the block and call someone up. Andi have actually have a discussion, but, like, I'm not gonna build out a work, you know, a workspace. I've gotta build out a home space companies that are pretty progressive, the ones that are investing Maurin technology for their employees. We're seeing them be ah, lot more successful in this covert air, which equals go get on the right tools the screen around the system, You know, the extra devices. So it's like, Hey, my postures. Great. I can actually go get work done. And I'm in a nice space. Same thing back in the office. We've built stuff. We're building low blue light technology into our commercial PCs. We put that on our high end consumer PC. So you know, now you can walk into your home office early in the morning. You can goto late at night. It will have you all tune so your body is ready to go to sleep. You know, you don't even have toe. I don't have to talk to your family at all during the day. You could just work all the time from your home office. But I think little pieces like that are going. How do we put technology in this world where it's, like, very easy toe walk in and out of your you know, your office and being tuned on. But, hey, I need to go to sleep or I need to be chilling out after that and get the right technology and capabilities that let people be successful. So I think it's pretty exciting. Everything we've been able to dio, >>right? So I want to shift gears a little bit. Um, talk about user interface. What? One of the reason of this article that we keep referencing 10 years ago was the launch of the iPad, right? And in the launch pad or the iPad didn't have, Ah, traditional keyboard. Um, but I think people found out that not having a traditional keyboard, depending on the type of your work you're doing is a little bit of an inhibitor to your productivity. But it really begs the question as we enter this new world of different types of interaction with these devices and the increased use of voice, whether it's with Siri or or Okay, Google, um, >>we've >>had, you know, regulations on the A d a. In terms of access to websites and this and that. Aziz, you kind of look into the future of of human interaction with these devices as you get more and more horsepower toe work with on the GPU and the CPU and you know, can free up more. Resource is to this type of activity. I know you can't share anything too far down the road. But what? How do you see kind of the future evolving to get beyond this quality keyboard that was designed to slow people down because types were, too. I'm still waiting for the more efficient keyboard option to be to be available. But what's the future of human interaction with these things? To take the the degree of efficiency up another level? >>Hey, Jeff, we will do a custom keyboard for you. So you get me your you get me your high speed layout, we'll get you get you one of those. Um, you know, we do see it is pretty remarkable how long the keyboards been around and we still see it's It's also remarkable to me how powerful that is as a input device for, you know, for some tasks in the world. So what we see is it's not gonna be what replaces the keyboard. And there's one way of going and doing things. But all this compute the sensors that capability on the systems are just gonna allow people to operate the way that they want to operate. So you look at a PC today. It still has this great keyboard. It still has a laptop form factor that has, you know, been there for It's probably 25 years or so. It's actually pretty nice because it fits on your lap. It balances really well on the coffee table. Um, it's, you know, We've looked at so many different form factors, and it actually is a stayed around for a good reason because it it's pretty pretty functional. You know, you take on top of that, though we've built touch in tow, all our systems and screen. So a capability that's available to many of our customers and I go people are just starting. In the beginning, it was like Okay, Hey, how do I take this PC with touch on the screen and then you go? I don't want to do everything with touch, but gosh, it's like how maney you now touch it. If it's something's not touch, you know you have little marks on the screen. I went thio, I went. Thio was looking and working with someone here in a design, a design firm, and, uh, they had a product that was non touch, and it's like I reached in touch the screen to try to make it bigger because my eyes were not quite as good and they were like, Oh yeah, that's not a touch that's not a touch system and everyone touches the screen so it's like that becomes normal voice is going to become normal we have capability on the PC. Like you said, there's a bunch of voice ecosystems. Not everything is easiest to go do invoice. There are some things where you go ahead. I just want to go touch that, you know, gesture in the same way we look at intelligence on the system of also going There are things I wanna have just happen because I always I always do that and I shouldn't have to do voice. I shouldn't have to do gesture, touch everything else like, Hey, maybe I start the morning and I always pull up my calendar. Why doesn't that happen? Or I like to listen to her, You know, a song in the evening as I'm typing away on email on getting things buttoned up for the day. It's like your system can anticipate some of those things and it will just do that for you. So I think I think you're exactly right. We're going to see multiple ways of interacting with technology, and it needs to be natural and easy for us and then let the user pick pick the way that they want to go and do things right. >>Well, you just touched on a whole, you jumped ahead to questions on my list of things I want to talk about. And really, that's the application of machine learning and artificial intelligence, not in a generic way. That's an app that sits inside of the PC, but but in terms of using that intelligence as you just described based on my work flow based on my habit based on the applications I use based on you know what, you can observe and learn about me. Or maybe it SSM dictate down from from the corporate set up. You know how that PC operates for me? Because I think that's it is a really interesting thing, right? Everyone uses their machine differently, and whether they use, you know, shortcuts or not, How many tabs do they have open? You know, the the variability. You must have crazy studies on this in terms of the way people actually operate. These things is so, so high, so huge opportunity to, you know, again kind of remove the the get the signal from the noise and help people decide what they should do. Prioritize what they should do and add a layer of of simplicity to you. know it is a complex amount of notifications firing at me all day long. >>Yeah, I think that's a huge. You know, you talked about the potential you have in a world where more APS that we use our cloud cloud based of going How do I augment the capability in this client device at the edge To be intelligent and helped me go do mawr versus just being, you know, really dumb and serving up this other other content. And I think everything you describe is opportunity that we see We started Jeff about five years ago and have been very aggressive and putting intelligence and machine learning into the systems we started on our work stations, where there is an obvious application of, like, how do I tune a system to get the most performance out of an application? And we saw settings configurations making them different helped tune these very specific, you know, cad engineering programs that developers were running their times really valuable. They want the most performance. We used to have to have people sit down and we go. Okay, let's go run this application. Under this workload, we can put a table together. Here's a bunch of recommendations. We started going well, Hey, how do we have that happened? Automat like, let's try different settings. Figure out what works. The machines should should self tune itself then and figure out what's right and get based on exactly what I'm running. And people can be running different combinations so suddenly got a lot smarter than our great engineer sitting in the lab and figuring out those tables. And then, you know, from that time then we brought it to I think, what's just tip of the iceberg Now, where we start looking at, uh, performance across all our systems? What applications of my running go set things up so that it works? We talked a little bit about batteries and power management. Hey, how am I using this system if I am a really mobile person? Always, you know, taking my battery down to really low levels, hopping on a plane, I need to be quickly charged, like the system can figure out. Hey, I really need to tune things. Not for when, when you go through all the mechanics of a battery, it's like I am willing to sacrifice some on the longevity of the battery to enable really fast charging of that system because Jeffs always on the go Jeff runs his battery down. I need to make sure when he plugs in, he has maximum juice. Hey, here's Sam who's in a work from home mode, always plugged in. It's not great on any battery in the world to always be at, you know, maximum maximum charge every single minute of the day. And Sam has not unplugged his system in the past. You know, five days. Hey, we can run that at 95% and he will have a long life to that battery and be really happy with the system. And he's never gonna run out of power. You can start doing in that space. You can start doing it around sound and the environment that people are in, how we get smart. And I think there's an enormous amount you could do on top of that, like you described just how people have used the systems and it can sound a little eerie, but like it's what we you know, the machine suddenly knows how I'm going to go do stuff, but I'm like I would like that it to be anticipating what I'm doing, and then it starts taking that mundane stuff that we have to do that just eats up time and, you know, goes and gets that done for us. So we could be focused on the creative and the really pushing the boundaries, thinking >>I love it because it always goes back to kind of what do you optimizing for right? And there isn't necessarily one answer to that question, and there's a lot of factors that go into that in terms of the timing. As you said, the person their behavior you know happen to GPS is I'm at an airport. Probably need to plug in for you in the airplane. It's a good stuff. I want to. I want to shift gears a little bit, Sam, to talk about operating systems, Um, and and you know, chromebooks air out now. And you know, it was kind of this breakthrough to go beyond kind of Windows based systems. I think there's a lot of people that you know hope at >>some point >>will be, you know, have the option to run Lennox based systems. But it's just, you know, with a cloud based world and a multi, you know, kind of device interaction with all those different applications, whether it's it's my phone or my my desktop or my laptop or my my chromebook or my whatever. Um, Aziz, you start to think about kind of operating systems and opening up, you know, kind of a new level of innovation with because the expectation now for for like, a chromebook is that it's almost 100% Web based APS, right? That there's really not a lot of need for anything local. Maybe a quick download, a picture too attached to to an email or something. How do you kind of look at the future and kind of operating systems for PC? Specifically? >>Yeah. Well, I think is You describe Jeff, the applications and what you're doing on the system has become increasingly important over time, and it will only become more important as we go go forward. So, you know, from that point of view window, we dio work with windows. We do work with Google and chrome. I mean, Windows 10 is a really good based operating system. Chrome has a lot of nice capability in that operating system, you know, Obviously Apple, a competitor, has a different approach in that space. But I think we have a really good set of offerings that we can put on our our systems. And then we're focused on tuning that experience on top of the operating system. I I think it's still too complicated to go and put a, you know, get a new PC into a work or home environment, retire the old PC and manage that system. And what we look at is independent of that operating system. People want to go get their stuff done. We need to make that great. They wanna get their device, they want to turn it on and they want to go use it. And we want to build a world where, like, as I'm getting a new device, my device should know me well enough to go. Hey, Sam, this is this is the right time to get a device. This is the right kind of device that you should get based on what you're going and doing. Hey, I'm going to just keep you up to date. I am going to you think about any issues with the system. We still have too many things that flow through a traditional Hey, there's an I T. Help desk and then they figure that out and then I go toe level two or level three if they can't sort that out. Hey, how do we put that stuff to your point, Jeff before around intelligence, How do we automate those processes? So we're thinking through You know what needs to happen on that system, keeping it up to date and fixing and remediating that system. So I think there's a huge potential regardless of what operating system is beneath it, and we have very good choices there to go. We've got to make that experience the one that's great for the users and that that's where we're really focusing our, you know, our time and our energy, Right? >>So let me shift gears again a little bit and full disclosure I've bought, and I don't know how many XPS towers in a row. I think I'm on my third or fourth in a row. I love >>it. I >>mean, I'm a desktop. I like to just pack those things full of as much horsepower and GPU and CPU and memory as I possibly can because to me again, Back to an investment and productivity. I don't wanna be waiting for slow machines. I just to me it's a couple 100 bucks for this upgrade. That upgrade, it seems brain dead to me that people don't do that. But in terms of when you get these things now and it comes in the mail, it's basically a >>box and a machine, and >>you think back to the old days right when there was books and warranty cards and, you know, a whole plethora of stuff that kind of fell out of that box. I know you know. That's That's probably a leading indicator on the consumer side, about some of your efforts around sustainability and and being efficient and obviously taking advantage of things like the cloud in terms of activating these machines in this and that. But I wonder if you can share a little bit on what you guys have been doing about sustainability, because I know it's important. You know, there's a big focus around, you know, kind of environmental trash on old electron ICS, which is a riel, a real problem that people are dressing. So I wonder if you can. You know. Take a minute, Thio, to share your guys efforts in this area. >>Yeah, I think you're absolutely right, Jeff. It is. It is really important. And we see, you know, arming the world with technology so people can do better. Things really matters, but I love doing stuff outside, like I want the environment to be great. And we need to do that in a sustainable and environmentally friendly way. So a couple of places we, you know, pushed really aggressively. You touched on the packaging. So whether that's taking, um, content out of boxes, that doesn't that doesn't need to be there. We've made very aggressive commitments with a series of 2030 goals that we're marching towards is a company where we said, you know, 100% of our packaging will be from sustainable or recyclable sources. So we've already moved aggressively in that space. When you look at what ocean bound plastic we're putting in our boxes, how we think about the materials that were picking, you know, cardboard, and using that in ways that go through the you know, the mail and can be shipped effectively. So we have maximum content there that can be recycled. We've we've committed that we will take back a system for every system that we ship. So getting and building this circular economy for electron ICS, we think is is very important. So we take the stuff that we've got out there and we put that back into a recycle process where you know your old PC can become part of your new cutting edge technology PC and we've led the industry and doing that in plastics were taking plastics from cases and plastics from systems, getting that back into new systems. We've done that with precious metals from the from the, uh, PCB lay board designs inside the systems. We've done that with rare earth metals and magnets, and we think there's opportunity to go farther in that space and then the 3rd 3rd kind of thing that we've committed Jeff is by by 2030 to have half the content of our new systems, be from recycled or renewable content. And we do a good job today of having the content in the systems be recyclable. It's almost over 90% by weight, but what we want to do and the work we need to go do is go get that recycled content going into a cutting edge technology that we're putting out there, and it's not. That's not a simple problem of going. People want things a structurally strong as possible, a super thin as performance as possible. And then we need to you, you know, we gotta use, um, basically waste that comes through and gets turned into new products. So we have our engineers are material science people working on how we make that riel. And we set some aggressive goals with, you know, Michael and the company that will be leadership and that we don't quite exactly know how to get there, but put us on the right kind of edge of pushing and doing the things that we need. Thio. We can have great technology and, you know, be responsible in the way that, as you said, is very important. >>It's great, and it's good to write it down, right? If you don't write it down, then it's just it just disappears into the into the ether. So, Sam, I really enjoyed getting to catch up. I want to give you the final word with a little bit. Look to the path and a little bit look to the future, right? A lot of conversation about Moore's law, and we got to the end of Moore's law and blah, blah, blah. And and I think that, you know, there's obviously technology behind that, and there's some real conversations. But to me, the more interesting topic around Moore's law is really the idea of Moore's law and this continual advancement of technology that's better, faster, cheaper. You've been doing this for 20 years at Del. You've seen tons of, you know, kind of Moore's law impacts and operating in this world where, you know, compute, compute storage and networking just is on this exponential scale on whether you want to talk about GP use or whatever again to me, it's not about the number, of course, and the transistor. It's about the transition in the core. It's about really the concept of this working in a world where you know you're gonna have a lot more. Where is power work with How do you How do you kind of reflect on, you know, the stuff that you're shipping today versus what you were shipping five years ago, 10 years ago, 20 years ago and then, more importantly, is you look forward. Um, you know what is what are you excited about? What gets you up in the morning? What puts a big smile on your face? Still come to work after 20 years of Dell? >>Yeah. You know, Jeff, it's a great question because the industry has changed so much over the last 10 20 years. So it's sometimes a fun thing. Toe. Look back at some of the products that we put out before. That seemed amazing at that point in time and you stack them against what we're doing now and then it could bring you down to Earth a little bit. So you see, the, uh, you see just the exponential improvements that we're able to make around the design of the product, the capability of the products. And I see that continuing the thing that gives me, you know, huge thought around this the device and the PC and the role is gonna play at the edge. We just did some research and we were looking at Millennials and Gen Z and looking around the world, and that is a huge and growing part of the population. It will be the the users of technology in the future with the world we're in today, 45% of them. So almost half of them said they would take their dollars and they want a premium, high end PC experience, and they would prioritize that versus other things they spend money on to go and have a great PC as a personal tool. Do you think about that translating to in a work environment they're gonna expect those same kind of great tools? And then to the question you asked, You know, I see a huge opportunity to continue to push forward the value and the way people use these devices, whether it's the intelligence we talked about. That to me is really exciting around building a machine that knows me and does things for me and how I want to use it, our ability to build immersive experiences so that you know, whether I'm gaming after work, collaborating with co workers like how do I put it so that we're together and it's a good Aziz that in person experience, we're gonna be able to do that with technology. You talked in a great questions around. Hey, the ways people interact with the systems, it will become natural. It will become whatever way they want to go and do that. And I think we can do that in a world where, yes, you can walk between all kinds of different devices. There will not be one device to end all. You'll be in a small screen device. You're gonna use a monitor. You're going to use a PC device. There will be technology across the home. But toe have that have that link together in the role that PC is gonna play in. That to me, is exciting. And we continue to, you know, invest aggressively. Michael saw that when he started the company. We continue to believe in the power of technology, and we're gonna figure out and drive those breakthroughs that will make the, you know, products exciting. And I love doing that every day of seeing the innovation we can put together and how that makes a difference for people. To me, that's really an exciting thing. >>Well, Sam, thank you. Thank you for the update. Again, the rumors of the PCs demise were greatly overstated. 10 years and glad to see that you're just kicking tail and doing exciting things. So thanks for for sharing your insight and your experience with us. >>Hey, thanks a lot for having me, Jeff. Great to talk to you. >>Absolutely. All right. He's Sam. I'm Jeff. You're watching the cubes. Continuing coverage of Dell Technology World 2020 The Digital Experience. Thanks for watching. See you next time.

Published Date : Oct 21 2020

SUMMARY :

World Digital Experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Hey, I am joining you live from Austin, Texas. And, you know, it's funny. is so bizarre, and that is not in fact, not true, you guys. So I think we actually saw a, you know, still alive So when I'm sitting at my desk, you know, I haven't a big giant XPS with all the ram So one of the things that's kept this business vibrant, you know, for the past 10 years and right now It is truly that work from anywhere and anywhere as you just defined, And, you know, you guys are that you're kind of that edge device that ultimately connects back to the mother And to me, the world doesn't just return back to a you know, and then, you know, kind of laptops and Chromebooks, what's kind of the high level kind of breakdown, And I really wanted something that, you know, lasted had great So this this kind of shift to, you know, kind of mawr content consumption So you know, now you can walk into your home office early in the morning. But it really begs the question as we enter this new world of different types of interaction with these had, you know, regulations on the A d a. In terms of access to websites and this and that. It still has a laptop form factor that has, you know, been there for It's probably 25 habit based on the applications I use based on you know what, you can observe and learn about me. stuff that we have to do that just eats up time and, you know, Sam, to talk about operating systems, Um, and and you know, chromebooks air out now. will be, you know, have the option to run Lennox based systems. I am going to you think about any issues with the system. I think I'm on my third or fourth in a row. But in terms of when you get these things now and it comes in the mail, it's basically a But I wonder if you can share a little bit on what you guys have been doing about sustainability, that we're marching towards is a company where we said, you know, 100% of our packaging will be from And and I think that, you know, And I see that continuing the thing that gives me, you know, huge thought around Thank you for the update. Great to talk to you. See you next time.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
MichaelPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

January 26 2010DATE

0.99+

MichaelsPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

AustinLOCATION

0.99+

Sam BurdPERSON

0.99+

SamPERSON

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

20 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

25 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

five daysQUANTITY

0.99+

45%QUANTITY

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

95%QUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

ThioPERSON

0.99+

iPadCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

third screenQUANTITY

0.99+

70QUANTITY

0.99+

Austin, TexasLOCATION

0.99+

seven monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

Windows 10TITLE

0.99+

SiriTITLE

0.99+

AzizPERSON

0.99+

fourthQUANTITY

0.99+

thirdQUANTITY

0.99+

MoorePERSON

0.99+

EarthLOCATION

0.99+

chromeTITLE

0.99+

10 years agoDATE

0.99+

ChromeTITLE

0.99+

second screenQUANTITY

0.99+

Sam BirdPERSON

0.99+

windowsTITLE

0.99+

second screenQUANTITY

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.98+

one screenQUANTITY

0.98+

20 years agoDATE

0.98+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

five years agoDATE

0.98+

SalesforceORGANIZATION

0.98+

two screensQUANTITY

0.98+

NASDAQORGANIZATION

0.98+

100 bucksQUANTITY

0.97+

one deviceQUANTITY

0.97+

2030DATE

0.97+

DelORGANIZATION

0.97+

Mik Kersten, Tasktop | BizOps Manifesto Unveiled


 

>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of biz ops Manifesto unveiled. Brought to you by Biz Ops Coalition. Hey, Welcome back, everybody. Jeffrey here with the Cube. We're coming to you from our Palo Alto studios. And welcome back to this event. Is the biz Opps Manifesto unveiling? So the biz Opps manifesto and the biz Opps coalition have been around for a little while, But today's the big day. That's kind of the big public unveiling are excited to have some of the foundational people that put their put their name on the dotted line, if you will, to support this initiative to talk about why that initiative is so important. And so the next guest, we're excited to have his doctor, Mick Kirsten. He is the founder and CEO of Task Top. Make great to see you coming in from Vancouver, Canada, I think. Right. >>Yes. Great to be here, Jeff. Thank you. Absolutely. >>I hope your air is a little better out there. I know you had some of the worst air of all of us a couple a couple of weeks back, so hopefully things air, uh, getting a little better. And we get those fires under control? >>Yeah, Things have cleared up now, so yeah, it's good. It's good to be close to the U. S. And it's gonna have the Arabic clean as well. >>Absolutely. So let's let's jump into it. So you you've just been an innovation guy forever Starting way back in the day and Xerox Park. I was so excited to do an event at Xerox Park for the first time last year. I mean that that to me represents along with Bell Labs and and some other, you know, kind of foundational innovation and technology centers. That's got to be one of the greatest one. So I just wonder if you could share some perspective of getting your start there at Xerox Parc. You know, some of the lessons you learn and what you've been ableto kind of carry forward from those days. >>Yeah, I was fortunate. Joined Xerox Park in the computer science lab there at a very early point in my career, and to be working on open source programming languages. So back then, and the computer science lab where some of the inventions around programming around software development names such as Object of programming and ah, lot of what we had around really modern programming levels construct. Those were the teams that had the fortune of working with and really our goal waas. And of course, there's a Z. You know, this, uh, there's just this DNA of innovation and excitement and innovation in the water. And really, it was the model that was all about changing the way that we work was looking at for how we could make it 10 times easier to write. Code like this is back in 99 we were looking at new ways of expressing especially business concerns, especially ways of enabling people who are who want to innovate for their business, to express those concerns in code and make that 10 times easier than what that would take. So we created a new open source programming language, and we saw some benefits, but not quite quite what we expected. I then went and actually joined Charles Stephanie that former chief actor Microsoft, who is responsible for I actually got a Microsoft word as a out of Xerox Parc and into Microsoft and into the hands of Bill Gates and the company I was behind the whole office suite and his vision and the one I was trying to execute with working for him was to, you know, make Power point like a programming language, make everything completely visual. And I realized none of this was really working, that there was something else fundamentally wrong that programming languages or new ways of building software like Let's try to do with Charles around intentional programming. That was not enough. >>That was not enough. So you know, the agile movement got started about 20 years ago, and we've seen the rise of Dev ops and really this kind of embracing of of, of sprints And, you know, getting away from M. R. D s and P. R. D s and these massive definitions of what we're gonna build and long billed cycles to this iterative process. And that's been going on for a little while. So what was still wrong? What was still missing? Why the Biz Ops Coalition? Why the biz ops manifesto? >>Yeah, so I basically think we nailed some of the things that the programming language levels of teams can have. Effective languages deployed softened the club easily now right and at the kind of process and collaboration and planning level agile two decades decades ago was formed. We were adopting all the all the teams I was involved with on. It's really become a solved problem. So agile tools, agile teams actually of planning are now very mature and the whole challenges when organizations try to scale that. And so what I realized is that the way that Agile was scaling across teams and really scaling from the Technology Party organization to the business was just completely flawed. The agile teams had one set of doing things. One set of metrics, one set of tools and the way that the business was working was planning was investing in technology was just completely disconnected and using a a whole different set of measures. It's pretty interesting because I think it's >>pretty clear from the software development teams in terms of what they're trying to deliver, because they've got a feature set right and they've got bugs and it's easy. It's easy to see what they deliver, but it sounds like what you're really honing in on is is disconnect on the business side in terms of, you know, is it the right investment you know. Are we getting the right business? R o I on this investment? Was that the right feature? Should we be building another feature or shall we building a completely different products? That so it sounds like it's really a core piece of this is to get the right measurement tools, the right measurement data sets so that you can make the right decisions in terms of what you're investing, you know, limited resource is you can't Nobody has unlimited resources and ultimately have to decide what to do, which means you're also deciding what not to dio. It sounds like that's a really big piece of this of this whole effort. >>Yeah, Jeff, that's exactly it. Which is the way that the adult measures their own way of working is very different from the way that you measure business outcomes. The business outcomes are in terms of how happy your customers are. Are you innovating fast enough to keep up with the pace of, ah, rapidly changing economy, rapidly changing market and those are those are all around the customer. And so what? I learned on this long journey of supporting many organizations transformations and having them trying to apply those principles vigilant develops that those are not enough. Those measures technical practices, those measures, technical excellence of bringing code to the market. They don't actually measure business outcomes. And so I realized that really was much more around having these entwined flow metrics that are customer centric and business centric and market centric where we needed to go. So I want to shift gears >>a little bit and talk about your book because you're also a best selling author project a product, and and you you brought up this concept in your book called The Flow Framework. And it's really interesting to me because I know, you know, flow on one hand is kind of a workflow in the process flow, and you know that's how things get done and and embrace the flow. On the other hand, you know, everyone now in a little higher level, existential way is trying to get into the flow right into the workflow and, you know not be interrupted and get into a state where you're kind of your highest productivity, you know, kind of your highest comfort. Which floor you talking about in your book, or is it a little bit of both. >>That's a great question, is it's not what I gotta ask very often, cause me, it's It's absolutely both. So the thing that we want to get that we've learned how toe and, uh, master individual flow, that there's this beautiful book by me Holly teachings mentality. There's a beautiful Ted talk about him as well, about how we can take control of our own flow. So my question with the book with project surprise, How can we bring that to entire teams and really entire organizations? How come we have everyone contributing to a customer outcome? And this is really what if you go to the bazaar manifesto? It says, I focus on Out comes on using data to drive, whether we're delivering those outcomes rather than a focus on proxy metrics such as How quickly did we implement this feature? And now it's really how much value did the customs of the future and how quickly did we learn? And how quickly did you use that data to drive to that next outcome? Really, that with companies like Netflix on, like Amazon, have mastered, how do we get that every large organization, every idea, organization and make everyone be a softer innovator. So it's to bring that on the concept of flow to these entering value streams. And the fascinating thing is, we've actually seen the data. We've been able to study a lot of value streams. We see when flow increases, when organizations deliver value to a customer faster developers actually become more happy. So things like that implying that promotes course rise. And we've got empirical data for this. So that beautiful thing to me is that we've actually been able thio, combine these two things and and see the results in the data that you increased flow to the customer, your development or more happy. I >>love it. I love it, right, because we're all more. We're all happier when we're in the flow and we're all more productive winner in the flow. So I that is a great melding of two concepts. But let's jump into the into the manifesto itself a little bit. And you know, I love that you know, that took this approach really of having kind of four key values, and he gets 12 key principles and I just want to read a couple these values because when you read them, it sounds pretty brain dead, right? Of course. Right. Of course, you should focus on business outcomes. Of course, you should have trust and collaboration. Of course, you should have data based decision making processes and not just intuition or, you know, whoever is the loudest person in the room on toe, learn and respond and pivot. But >>what's the >>value of actually just putting them on a piece of paper? Because again, this is not this. These are all good positive things, right? When when somebody reads these to you or tells you these or sticks it on the wall? Of course. But unfortunately, of course, isn't always enough. >>No, I think what's happened is some of these core principles originally from the agile manifested two decades ago. The whole Dev ops movement of the last decade off flow feedback and continue learning has been key. But a lot of organizations, especially the ones undergoing transformations, have actually gone a very different way, right? The way that they measure value in technology innovation is through costs For many organizations, the way that they actually are looking at at their moving to cloud is actually is a reduction in costs, whereas the right way of looking at moving the cloud is how much more quickly can we get to the value to the customer? How quickly can we learn from that? And how could quickly can we drive the next business outcome? So, really, the key thing is to move away from those old ways of doing things that funding projects and call centers to actually funding and investing in outcomes and measuring outcomes through these flow metrics, which in the end are your fast feedback for how quickly you're innovating for your customer. So these things do seem, you know, very obvious when you look at them. But the key thing is what you need to stop doing. To focus on these, you need to actually have accurate real time data off how much value your phone to the customer every week, every month, every quarter. And if you don't have that, your decisions are not given on data. If you don't know what your bottle like, it's. And this is something that in the decades of manufacturing car manufacturers, other manufacturers master. They always know where the bottom back in their production processes you ask, uh, random. See, I all want a global 500 company where the bottleneck is, and you won't get it there. Answer. Because there's not that level of understanding. So have to actually follow these principles. You need to know exactly where you follow like is because that's what's making your developers miserable and frustrated on having them context, which on thrash So it. The approach here is important, and we have to stop doing these other things right. >>There's so much. They're a pack. I love it, you know, especially the cloud conversation, because so many people look at it wrong as a cost saving device as opposed to an innovation driver, and they get stuck, they get stuck in the literal. And, you know, I think the same thing always about Moore's law, right? You know, there's a lot of interesting riel tech around Moore's law and the increasing power of microprocessors. But the real power, I think in Moore's laws, is the attitudinal change in terms of working in a world where you know that you've got all this power and what will you build and design? E think it's funny to your your comment on the flow in the bottleneck, right? Because because we know manufacturing assumes you fix one bottleneck. You move to your next one, right, You always move to your next point of failure. So if you're not fixing those things, you know you're not. You're not increasing that speed down the line unless you can identify where that bottleneck is, or no matter how Maney improvements you make to the rest of the process, it's still going to get hung up on that one spot. >>That's exactly, and you also make it sound so simple. But again, if you don't have the data driven visibility of where the bottleneck is. And but these bottlenecks are just as you said, if it's just lack, um, all right, so we need to understand is the bottleneck, because our security use air taking too long and stopping us from getting like the customer. If it's that automate that process and then you move on to the next bottleneck, which might actually be that deploy yourself through the clouds is taking too long. But if you don't take that approach of going flow first rather than again the sort of way cost production first you have taken approach of customer centric city, and you only focus on optimizing cost. Your costs will increase and your flow will slow down. And this is just one, these fascinating things. Whereas if you focus on getting back to the customer and reducing your cycles on getting value your flow time from six months to two weeks or 21 week or two event as we see with tech giants, you actually could both lower your costs and get much more value. Of course, get that learning going. So I think I've I've seen all these cloud deployments and modernizations happen that delivered almost no value because there was such a big ball next up front in the process. And actually the hosting and the AP testing was not even possible with all of those inefficiencies. So that's why going flow first rather than costs. First, there are projects versus Sochi. >>I love that and and and and it begs, repeating to that right within a subscription economy. You know you're on the hook to deliver value every single month because they're paying you every single month. So if you're not on top of how you delivering value, you're going to get sideways because it's not like, you know, they pay a big down payment and a small maintenance fee every month. But once you're in a subscription relationship, you know you have to constantly be delivering value and upgrading that value because you're constantly taking money from the customers. It's it's such a different kind of relationship, that kind of the classic, you know, Big Bang with the maintenance agreement on the back end really important. >>Yeah, and I think in terms of industry ship, that's it. That's what catalyzed this industry shift is in this SAS that subscription economy. If you're not delivering more and more value to your customers, someone else's and they're winning the business, not you. So one way we know is that divide their customers with great user experiences. Well, that really is based on how many features you delivered or how much. How about how many quality improvements or scaler performance improvements you delivered? So the problem is, and this is what the business manifesto was was the forefront of touch on is, if you can't measure how much value delivered to a customer, what are you measuring? You just back again measuring costs, and that's not a measure of value. So we have to shift quickly away from measuring costs to measuring value to survive in in the subscription economy. Mick, >>we could go for days and days and days. I want to shift gears a little bit into data and and a data driven, um, decision making a data driven organization. Because right day has been talked about for a long time. The huge big data mean with with Hadoop over over several years and data warehouses and data lakes and data, oceans and data swamps and you go on and on, it's not that easy to do right. And at the same time, the proliferation of data is growing exponentially were just around the corner from from I, O. T and five G. So now the accumulation of data at machine scale again this is gonna overwhelm, and one of the really interesting principles that I wanted to call out and get your take right is today's organizations generate mawr data than humans can process. So informed decisions must be augmented by machine learning and artificial intelligence. I wonder if you can again, you've got some great historical perspective reflect on how hard it is to get the right data to get the data in the right context and then to deliver to the decision makers and then trust the decision makers to actually make the data and move that down. You know, it's kind of this democratization process into more and more people and more and more frontline jobs, making more and more of these little decisions every day. >>Yeah, and Jeff, I think the front part of what you said are where the promises of big data have completely fallen on their face into these swamps. As you mentioned, because if you don't have the data and the right format, you can connect, collected that the right way, you're not. Model it that way the right way. You can't use human or machine learning on it effectively. And there have been the number of data, warehouses and a typical enterprise organization, and the sheer investment is tremendous. But the amount of intelligence being extracted from those is a very big problem. So the key thing that I've known this is that if you can model your value streams so you actually understand how you're innovating, how you're measuring the delivery value and how long that takes. What is your time to value through these metrics? Like for the time you can actually use both. You know the intelligence that you've got around the table and push that balance as it the assay, far as you can to the organization. But you can actually start using that those models to understand, find patterns and detect bottlenecks that might be surprising, Right? Well, you can detect interesting bottle next one you shift to work from home. We detected all sorts of interesting bottlenecks in our own organization that we're not intuitive to me that had to do with more senior people being overloaded and creating bottlenecks where they didn't exist. Whereas we thought we were actually organization. That was very good at working from home because of our open source route. So the data is highly complex. Software Valley streams are extremely complicated, and the only way to really get the proper analysts and data is to model it properly and then to leverage these machine learning and AI techniques that we have. But that front, part of what you said, is where organizations are just extremely immature in what I've seen, where they've got data from all the tools, but not modeled in the right way. >>Well, all right, so before I let you go, you know? So you get a business leader he buys in. He reads the manifesto. He signs on the dotted line. He says, Mick, how do I get started? I want to be more aligned with With the development teams, you know, I'm in a very competitive space. We need to be putting out new software features and engage with our customers. I want to be more data driven. How do I get started? Well, you know, what's the biggest inhibitor for most people to get started and get some early winds, which we know is always the key to success in any kind of a new initiative, >>right? So I think you can reach out to us through the website. Uh, on the is a manifesto, but the key thing is just it's exactly what you said, Jeff. It's to get started and get the key wins. So take a probably value stream. That's mission critical. It could be your new mobile Web experiences, or or part of your cloud modernization platform where your analysts pipeline. But take that and actually apply these principles to it and measure the entire inflow of value. Make sure you have a volumetric that everyone is on the same page on, right. The people on the development teams that people in leadership all the way up to the CEO and one of the where I encourage you to start is actually that enter and flow time, right? That is the number one metric. That is how you measure whether you're getting the benefit of your cloud modernization. That is the one metric that even Cockcroft when people I respect tremendously put in his cloud for CEOs Metric 11 way to measure innovation. So basically, take these principles, deployed them on one product value stream measure into and flow time on. Then you'll actually you well on your path to transforming and to applying the concepts of agile and develops all the way to the business to the way in your operating model. >>Well, Mick, really great tips, really fun to catch up. I look forward to a time when we can actually sit across the table and and get into this, because I just I just love the perspective. And, you know, you're very fortunate to have that foundational, that foundational base coming from Xerox parc. And it's, you know, it's a very magical place with a magical history. So the to incorporate that and to continue to spread that wealth, you know, good for you through the book and through your company. So thanks for sharing your insight with us today. >>Thanks so much for having me, Jeff. Absolutely. >>Alright. And go to the biz ops manifesto dot org's Read it. Check it out. If you want to sign it, sign it. They'd love to have you do it. Stay with us for continuing coverage of the unveiling of the business manifesto on the Cube. I'm Jeffrey. Thanks for watching. See you next time.

Published Date : Oct 16 2020

SUMMARY :

Make great to see you coming in from Vancouver, Canada, I think. Absolutely. I know you had some of the worst air of all of us a couple a couple of weeks back, It's good to be close to the U. S. And it's gonna have the Arabic You know, some of the lessons you learn and what you've been ableto kind of carry forward you know, make Power point like a programming language, make everything completely visual. So you know, the agile movement got started about 20 years ago, and the whole challenges when organizations try to scale that. on is is disconnect on the business side in terms of, you know, is it the right investment you know. very different from the way that you measure business outcomes. And it's really interesting to me because I know, you know, flow on one hand is kind of a workflow the results in the data that you increased flow to the customer, your development or more happy. And you know, I love that you know, that took this approach really of having kind of four key When when somebody reads these to you or tells you these or sticks But the key thing is what you need to stop doing. You're not increasing that speed down the line unless you can identify where that bottleneck is, flow first rather than again the sort of way cost production first you have taken you know you have to constantly be delivering value and upgrading that value because you're constantly taking money and this is what the business manifesto was was the forefront of touch on is, if you can't measure how and data lakes and data, oceans and data swamps and you go on and on, it's not that easy to do So the key thing that I've known this is that if you can model your value streams so you more aligned with With the development teams, you know, I'm in a very competitive space. but the key thing is just it's exactly what you said, Jeff. continue to spread that wealth, you know, good for you through the book and through your company. Thanks so much for having me, Jeff. They'd love to have you do it.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

Mick KirstenPERSON

0.99+

JeffreyPERSON

0.99+

Mik KerstenPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

MickPERSON

0.99+

12 key principlesQUANTITY

0.99+

10 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bell LabsORGANIZATION

0.99+

CharlesPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

Task TopORGANIZATION

0.99+

two decades agoDATE

0.99+

Xerox ParkORGANIZATION

0.99+

U. S.LOCATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

Bill GatesPERSON

0.99+

CockcroftPERSON

0.99+

HollyPERSON

0.99+

agileTITLE

0.99+

two weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

21 weekQUANTITY

0.99+

one setQUANTITY

0.99+

one metricQUANTITY

0.99+

Biz Ops CoalitionORGANIZATION

0.99+

two conceptsQUANTITY

0.99+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.99+

Xerox ParcORGANIZATION

0.98+

Charles StephaniePERSON

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

two decades decades agoDATE

0.98+

Vancouver, CanadaLOCATION

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

The Flow FrameworkTITLE

0.97+

TedPERSON

0.96+

One setQUANTITY

0.96+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.96+

500 companyQUANTITY

0.96+

M. R. DPERSON

0.95+

Xerox ParkLOCATION

0.95+

firstQUANTITY

0.93+

one spotQUANTITY

0.92+

P. R. DPERSON

0.92+

one bottleneckQUANTITY

0.92+

SochiORGANIZATION

0.91+

AgileTITLE

0.91+

about 20 years agoDATE

0.9+

last decadeDATE

0.9+

decadesQUANTITY

0.88+

single monthQUANTITY

0.88+

MoorePERSON

0.87+

XeroxORGANIZATION

0.87+

first timeQUANTITY

0.87+

ArabicOTHER

0.86+

four key valuesQUANTITY

0.83+

Opps ManifestoEVENT

0.82+

Big BangEVENT

0.8+

everyQUANTITY

0.76+

TasktopORGANIZATION

0.72+

couple of weeksDATE

0.7+

coupleQUANTITY

0.69+