Image Title

Search Results for Stripe:

Noor Faraby & Brian Brunner, Stripe Data Pipeline | AWS re:Invent 2022


 

>>Hello, fabulous cloud community and welcome to Las Vegas. We are the Cube and we will be broadcasting live from the AWS Reinvent Show floor for the next four days. This is our first opening segment. I am joined by the infamous John Furrier. John, it is your 10th year being here at Reinvent. How does >>It feel? It's been a great to see you. It feels great. I mean, just getting ready for the next four days. It's, this is the marathon of all tech shows. It's, it's busy, it's crowd, it's loud and the content and the people here are really kind of changing the game and the stories are always plentiful and deep and just it's, it really is one of those shows you kind of get intoxicated on the show floor and in the event and after hours people are partying. I mean it is like the big show and 10 years been amazing run People getting bigger. You're seeing the changing ecosystem Next Gen Cloud and you got the Classics Classic still kind of doing its thing. So getting a lot data, a lot of data stories. And our guests here are gonna talk more about that. This is the year the cloud kind of goes next gen and you start to see the success Gen One cloud players go on the next level. It's gonna be really fun. Fun week. >>Yes, I'm absolutely thrilled and you can certainly feel the excitement. The show floor doors just opened, people pouring in the drinks are getting stacked behind us. As you mentioned, it is gonna be a marathon and very exciting. On that note, fantastic interview to kick us off here. We're starting the day with Stripe. Please welcome nor and Brian, how are you both doing today? Excited to be here. >>Really happy to be here. Nice to meet you guys. Yeah, >>Definitely excited to be here. Nice to meet you. >>Yeah, you know, you were mentioning you could feel the temperature and the energy in here. It is hot, it's a hot show. We're a hot crew. Let's just be honest about that. No shame in that. No shame in that game. But I wanna, I wanna open us up. You know, Stripe serving 2 million customers according to the internet. AWS with 1 million customers of their own, both leading companies in your industries. What, just in case there's someone in the audience who hasn't heard of Stripe, what is Stripe and how can companies use it along with AWS nor, why don't you start us off? >>Yeah, so Stripe started back in 2010 originally as a payments company that helped businesses accept and process their payments online. So that was something that traditionally had been really tedious, kind of difficult for web developers to set up. And what Stripe did was actually introduce a couple of lines of code that developers could really easily integrate into their websites and start accepting those payments online. So payments is super core to who Stripe is as a company. It's something that we still focus on a lot today, but we actually like to think of ourselves now as more than just a payments company but rather financial infrastructure for the internet. And that's just because we have expanded into so many different tools and technologies that are beyond payments and actually help businesses with just about anything that they might need to do when it comes to the finances of running an online company. So what I mean by that, couple examples being setting up online marketplaces to accept multi-party payments, running subscriptions and recurring payments, collecting sales tax accurately and compliantly revenue recognition and data and analytics. Importantly on all of those things, which is what Brian and I focus on at Stripe. So yeah, since since 2010 Stripes really grown to serve millions of customers, as you said, from your small startups to your large multinational companies, be able to not only run their payments but also run complex financial operations online. >>Interesting. Even the Cube, the customer of Stripe, it's so easy to integrate. You guys got your roots there, but now as you guys got bigger, I mean you guys have massive traction and people are doing more, you guys are gonna talk here on the data pipeline in front you, the engineering manager. What has it grown to, I mean, what are some of the challenges and opportunities your customers are facing as they look at that data pipeline that you guys are talking about here at Reinvent? >>Yeah, so Stripe Data Pipeline really helps our customers get their data out of Stripe and into, you know, their data warehouse into Amazon Redshift. And that has been something that for our customers it's super important. They have a lot of other data sets that they want to join our Stripe data with to kind of get to more complex, more enriched insights. And Stripe data pipeline is just a really seamless way to do that. It lets you, without any engineering, without any coding, with pretty minimal setup, just connect your Stripe account to your Amazon Redshift data warehouse, really secure. It's encrypted, you know, it's scalable, it's gonna meet all of the needs of kind of a big enterprise and it gets you all of your Stripe data. So anything in our api, a lot of our reports are just like there for you to take and this just overcomes a big hurdle. I mean this is something that would take, you know, multiple engineers months to build if you wanted to do this in house. Yeah, we give it to you, you know, with a couple clicks. So it's kind of a, a step change for getting data out of Stripe into your data work. >>Yeah, the topic of this chat is getting more data outta your data from Stripe with the pipelining, this is kind of an interesting point, I want to get your thoughts. You guys are in the, in the front lines with customers, you know, stripes started out with their roots line of code, get up and running, payment gateway, whatever you wanna call it. Developers just want to get cash on the door. Thank you very much. Now you're kind of turning in growing up and continue to grow. Are you guys like a financial cloud? I mean, would you categorize yourself as a, cuz you're on top of aws? >>Yeah, financial infrastructure of the internet was a, was a claim I definitely wanna touch on from your, earlier today it was >>Powerful. You guys are super financial cloud basically. >>Yeah, super cloud basically the way that AWS kind of is the superstar in cloud computing. That's how we feel at Stripe that we want to put forth as financial infrastructure for the internet. So yeah, a lot of similarities. Actually it's funny, we're, we're really glad to be at aws. I think this is the first time that we've participated in a conference like this. But just to be able to participate and you know, be around AWS where we have a lot of synergies both as companies. Stripe is a customer of AWS and you know, for AWS users they can easily process payments through Stripe. So a lot of synergies there. And yeah, at a company level as well, we find ourselves really aligned with AWS in terms of the goals that we have for our users, helping them scale, expand globally, all of those good things. >>Let's dig in there a little bit more. Sounds like a wonderful collaboration. We love to hear of technology partnerships like that. Brian, talk to us a little bit about the challenges that the data pipeline solves from Stripe for Redshift users. >>Yeah, for sure. So Stripe Data Pipeline uses Amazon RedShift's built in data sharing capabilities, which gives you kind of an instant view into your Stripe data. If you weren't using Stripe data pipeline, you would have to, you know, ingest the state out of our api, kind of pull yourself manually. And yeah, I think that's just like a big part of it really is just the simplicity with what you can pull the data. >>Yeah, absolutely. And I mean the, the complexity of data and the volume of it is only gonna get bigger. So tools like that that can make things a lot easier are what we're all looking for. >>What's the machine learning angle? Cause I know there's lots of big topic here this year. More machine learning, more ai, a lot more solutions on top of the basic building blocks and the primitives at adds, you guys fit right into that. Cause developers doing more, they're either building their own or rolling out solutions. How do you guys see you guys connecting into that with the pipeline? Because, you know, data pipelining people like, they like that's, it feels like a heavy lift. What's the challenge there? Because when people roll their own or try to get in, it's, it's, it could be a lot of muck as they say. Yeah. What's the, what's the real pain point that you guys solve? >>So in terms of, you know, AI and machine learning, what Stripe Data Pipeline is gonna give you is it gives you a lot of signals around your payments that you can incorporate into your models. We actually have a number of customers that use Stripe radar data, so our fraud product and they integrate it with their in-house data that they get from other sources, have a really good understanding of fraud within their whole business. So it's kind of a way to get that data without having to like go through the process of ingesting it. So like, yeah, your, your team doesn't have to think about the ingestion piece. They can just think about, you know, building models, enriching the data, getting insights on top >>And Adam, so let's, we call it etl, the nasty three letter word in my interview with them. And that's what we're getting to where data is actually connecting via APIs and pipelines. Yes. Seamlessly into other data. So the data mashup, it feels like we're back into in the old mashup days now you've got data mashing up together. This integration's now a big practice, it's a becoming an industry standard. What are some of the patterns and matches that you see around how people are integrating their data? Because we all know machine learning works better when there's more data available and people want to connect their data and integrate it without the hassle. What's the, what's some of the use cases that >>Yeah, totally. So as Brian mentioned, there's a ton of use case for engineering teams and being able to get that data reported over efficiently and correctly and that's, you know, something exactly like you touched on that we're seeing nowadays is like simply having access to the data isn't enough. It's all about consolidating it correctly and accurately and effectively so that you can draw the best insights from that. So yeah, we're seeing a lot of use cases for teams across companies, including, a big example is finance teams. We had one of our largest users actually report that they were able to close their books faster than ever from integrating all of their Stripe revenue data for their business with their, the rest of their data in their data warehouse, which was traditionally something that would've taken them days, weeks, you know, having to do the manual aspect. But they were able to, to >>Simplify that, Savannah, you know, we were talking at the last event we were at Supercomputing where it's more speeds and feeds as people get more compute power, right? They can do more at the application level with developers. And one of the things we've been noticing I'd love to get your reaction to is as you guys have customers, millions of customers, are you seeing customers doing more with Stripe that's not just customers where they're more of an ecosystem partner of Stripe as people see that Stripe is not just a, a >>More comprehensive solution. >>Yeah. What's going on with the customer base? I can see the developers embedding it in, but once you get Stripe, you're like a, you're the plumbing, you're the financial bloodline if you will for the all the applications. Are your customers turning into partners, ecosystem partners? How do you see that? >>Yeah, so we definitely, that's what we're hoping to do. We're really hoping to be everything that a user needs when they wanna run an online business, be able to come in and maybe initially they're just using payments or they're just using billing to set up subscriptions but down the line, like as they grow, as they might go public, we wanna be able to scale with them and be able to offer them all of the products that they need to do. So Data Pipeline being a really important one for, you know, if you're a smaller company you might not be needing to leverage all of this big data and making important product decisions that you know, might come down to the very details, but as you scale, it's really something that we've seen a lot of our larger users benefit from. >>Oh and people don't wanna have to factor in too many different variables. There's enough complexity scaling a business, especially if you're headed towards IPO or something like that. Anyway, I love that the Stripe data pipeline is a no code solution as well. So people can do more faster. I wanna talk about it cuz it struck me right away on our lineup that we have engineering and product marketing on the stage with us. Now for those who haven't worked in a very high growth, massive company before, these teams can have a tiny bit of tension only because both teams want a lot of great things for the end user and their community. Tell me a little bit about the culture at Stripe and what it's like collaborating on the data pipeline. >>Yeah, I mean I, I can kick it off, you know, from, from the standpoint like we're on the same team, like we want to grow Stripe data pipeline, that is the goal. So whatever it takes to kind of get that job done is what we're gonna do. And I think that is something that is just really core to all of Stripe is like high collaboration, high trust, you know, this is something where we can all win if we work together. You don't need to, you know, compete with like products for like resourcing or to get your stuff done. It's like no, what's the, what's the, the team goal here, right? Like we're looking for team wins, not, you know, individual wins. >>Awesome. Yeah. And at the end of the day we have the same goal of connecting the product and the user in a way that makes sense and delivering the best product to that target user. So it's, it's really, it's a great collaboration and as Brian mentioned, the culture at Stripe really aligns with that as >>Well. So you got the engineering teams that get value outta that you guys are dealing with, that's your customer. But the security angle really becomes a big, I think catalyst cuz not just engineering, they gotta build stuff in so they're always building, but the security angle's interesting cuz now you got that data feeding security teams, this is becoming very secure security ops oriented. >>Yeah, you know, we are really, really tight partners with our internal security folks. They review everything that we do. We have a really robust security team. But I think, you know, kind of tying back to the Amazon side, like Amazon, Redshift is a very secure product and the way that we share data is really secure. You know, the, the sharing mechanism only works between encrypted clusters. So your data is encrypted at rest, encrypted and transit and excuse me, >>You're allowed to breathe. You also swallow the audience as well as your team at Stripe and all of us here at the Cube would like your survival. First and foremost, the knowledge we'll get to the people. >>Yeah, for sure. Where else was I gonna go? Yeah, so the other thing like you kind of mentioned, you know, there are these ETLs out there, but they, you know that that requires you to trust your data to a third party. So that's another thing here where like your data is only going from stripe to your cluster. There's no one in the middle, no one else has seen what you're doing, there's no other security risks. So security's a big focus and it kind of runs through the whole process both on our side and Amazon side. >>What's the most important story for Stripe at this event? You guys hear? How would you say, how would you say, and if you're on the elevator, what's going on with Stripe? Why now? What's so important at Reinvent for Stripe? >>Yeah, I mean I'm gonna use this as an opportunity to plug data pipelines. That's what we focus on. We're here representing the product, which is the easiest way for any user of aws, a user of Amazon, Redshift and a user of Stripe be able to connect the dots and get their data in the best way possible so that they can draw important business insights from that. >>Right? >>Yeah, I think, you know, I would double what North said, really grow Stripe data pipeline, get it to more customers, get more value for our customers by connecting them with their data and with reporting. I think that's, you know, my goal here is to talk to folks, kind of understand what they want to see out of their data and get them onto Stripe data pipeline. >>And you know, former Mike Mikela, former eight executive now over there at Stripe leading the charge, he knows a lot about Amazon here at aws. The theme tomorrow, Adams Leslie keynote, it's gonna be a lot about data, data integration, data end to end Lifeing, you see more, we call it data as code where engineering infrastructure as code was cloud was starting to see a big trend towards data as code where it's more of an engineering opportunity and solution insights. This data as code is kinda like the next evolution. What do you guys think about that? >>Yeah, definitely there is a ton that you can get out of your data if it's in the right place and you can analyze it in the correct ways. You know, you look at Redshift and you can pull data from Redshift into a ton of other products to like, you know, visualize it to get machine learning insights and you need the data there to be able to do this. So again, Stripe Data Pipeline is a great way to take your data and integrate it into the larger data picture that you're building within your company. >>I love that you are supporting businesses of all sizes and millions of them. No. And Brian, thank you so much for being here and telling us more about the financial infrastructure of the internet. That is Stripe, John Furrier. Thanks as always for your questions and your commentary. And thank you to all of you for tuning in to the Cubes coverage of AWS Reinvent Live here from Las Vegas, Nevada. I'm Savannah Peterson and we look forward to seeing you all week.

Published Date : Nov 29 2022

SUMMARY :

I am joined by the infamous John Furrier. kind of goes next gen and you start to see the success Gen One cloud players go Yes, I'm absolutely thrilled and you can certainly feel the excitement. Nice to meet you guys. Definitely excited to be here. Yeah, you know, you were mentioning you could feel the temperature and the energy in here. as you said, from your small startups to your large multinational companies, I mean you guys have massive traction and people are doing more, you guys are gonna talk here and it gets you all of your Stripe data. you know, stripes started out with their roots line of code, get up and running, payment gateway, whatever you wanna call it. You guys are super financial cloud basically. But just to be able to participate and you know, be around AWS We love to hear of technology of it really is just the simplicity with what you can pull the data. And I mean the, the complexity of data and the volume of it is only gonna get bigger. blocks and the primitives at adds, you guys fit right into that. So in terms of, you know, AI and machine learning, what Stripe Data Pipeline is gonna give you is matches that you see around how people are integrating their data? that would've taken them days, weeks, you know, having to do the manual aspect. Simplify that, Savannah, you know, we were talking at the last event we were at Supercomputing where it's more speeds and feeds as people I can see the developers embedding it in, but once you get Stripe, decisions that you know, might come down to the very details, but as you scale, Anyway, I love that the Stripe data pipeline is Yeah, I mean I, I can kick it off, you know, from, So it's, it's really, it's a great collaboration and as Brian mentioned, the culture at Stripe really aligns they gotta build stuff in so they're always building, but the security angle's interesting cuz now you Yeah, you know, we are really, really tight partners with our internal security folks. You also swallow the audience as well as your team at Stripe Yeah, so the other thing like you kind of mentioned, We're here representing the product, which is the easiest way for any user I think that's, you know, my goal here is to talk to folks, kind of understand what they want And you know, former Mike Mikela, former eight executive now over there at Stripe leading the charge, Yeah, definitely there is a ton that you can get out of your data if it's in the right place and you can analyze I love that you are supporting businesses of all sizes and millions of them.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
BrianPERSON

0.99+

Mike MikelaPERSON

0.99+

2010DATE

0.99+

Brian BrunnerPERSON

0.99+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Savannah PetersonPERSON

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

10th yearQUANTITY

0.99+

StripesORGANIZATION

0.99+

SavannahPERSON

0.99+

Noor FarabyPERSON

0.99+

1 million customersQUANTITY

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

RedshiftORGANIZATION

0.99+

stripesORGANIZATION

0.99+

2 million customersQUANTITY

0.99+

Las Vegas, NevadaLOCATION

0.99+

both teamsQUANTITY

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

FirstQUANTITY

0.98+

awsORGANIZATION

0.98+

millionsQUANTITY

0.98+

Stripe Data PipelineORGANIZATION

0.97+

this yearDATE

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

eight executiveQUANTITY

0.96+

tomorrowDATE

0.96+

first opening segmentQUANTITY

0.96+

millions of customersQUANTITY

0.96+

stripeORGANIZATION

0.91+

Adams LesliePERSON

0.9+

Zaki Bajwa, Stripe | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

(upbeat music) >> Hey everyone. Welcome back to Las Vegas. The Cube is live. I can't say that enough. We are alive at AWS re:Invent 2021. Lisa Martin with Dave Nicholson. Hey Dave. >> Hey Lisa. >> Having a good day so far. >> So far, so good. >> We have an alumni back with us. We have about a hundred segments on the cube at AWS remit. We've got one of our original alumni back with us. Zaki Bajwa joins us the global head of partner solution engineers at Stripe. Zaki welcome back. >> Thank you, Lisa, thank you, Dave. Pleasure to be here. >> Lisa: Isn't it great to be back in person? >> Love it. Love it. Can't do a whiteboard virtually, you can, it's not the same. >> It's not the same and all those conversations I'm sure that you've had with partners and with customers the last couple of days that you just can't replicate that over zoom. >> Zaki: Exactly. >> So just for anyone who doesn't understand, AWS has a massive ecosystem of partners. So we'll get to talk about Stripe and AWS, but for anyone that doesn't know what Stripe is, give us the lowdown. You guys started 10 years ago. Talk to us about Stripe, the business strategy, what it's like today. >> Yeah, sure. So you guys know Stripe started 10 years ago by two brothers, John and Patrick Collison. And they've really focused on the developer and helping the developers accelerate digital commerce. Why? Cause the status quo at the time was one where a developer needed to, you know, build banking relationships with issuing banks, merchant banks, card networks, payment networks, tax liabilities, data compliance, and all of these manual processes that they had to deal with. So what Stripe aspires to do is build a complete commerce platform. Leveraging our integrated suite of products that is really allowing us to build what we call the global payments and treasury network. So if you think about the global payment and treasury network or what we call the G P T N it's meant to not only help abstract all of that complexity from a global payment infrastructure point of view, but also help move money in a simple and borderless and a programmable way just like we do in the internet. So that's the core essence of Stripe is to build this global payment treasury network to allow for money movement to happen in a simple and borderless manner. >> Simple and borderless two key things there. How has the business strategy evolved in the last 10 years and specifically in the last 20, 22 months? >> Yeah. Great question. So as you can imagine with COVID, you know, David you can order a cup of coffee or a brand new car, and that whole direct to consumer model has accelerated in COVID right. We've accelerated ourselves going to upwards of 6,000 employees. We've been able to answer or manage upwards of 170 billion API requests in the last 12 months alone. Right we deliver upwards of five nines from a availability performance point of view. That means 13 seconds of downtime or less a month. And we're doing this originally starting off for the developer David as you talked about allowing developers to deliver, you know, what I call process payments, accept payments and reconcile payments. But the evolution that you're talking about Lisa has really led to three key areas of focus that our users are requesting from us. And Stripe's first operating principle is really that user first mentality similar to the Amazons where we listen to our users and they're really asking for three key areas of focus. Number one is all around modernizing their digital commerce. So this is big enterprises coming to us and saying, whether I'm a uni lever or a Ford, how do you help me with a direct to consumer a e-commerce type platform? Number one. Secondly, is companies like Deliveroo and Lyft creating what we call marketplaces. Also think about Twitter and clubhouse, more solopreneurs entrepreneurs kind of marketplaces. Third is all around SaaS business models. So think about slack and Atlassian. That are customer vivers and accelerating the journey with us around digitizing digital commerce. So that's the first area of evolution. The second area is all around what we call embedded FinTech. So we know just like Amazon helped accelerate infrastructure as a service, platform as a service and function as a service. We're helping accelerate FinTech as a service. So we believe every company in every industry aspires to add more and more FinTech capabilities in their core services that they offer to their customers. So think about a Shopify or a Lyft they're adding more FinTech capabilities, leveraging Stripe APIs that they offer to their consumers. Likewise, when you think about a Monzo bank or a and 26, what we call Neo banks. They're creating more banking as a service component so a second area of evolution is all around FinTech as a service or embedded FinTech. And the third area of focus again, listen to our users is all around users are saying. Hey, Stripe, you have our financial data. How do you help us more with business operations and automating and optimizing our business operations? So this is revenue management, revenue reconciliation, financial reporting, all of the business processes, you and I know, code to cash, order to cash, pay to procure. Help us automate, optimize, and not just optimize, but help us create net new business models. So these are the three key areas of evolution that we've seen modernizing digital commerce, embedded FinTech, and then certainly last but not least business operations and automating that. >> And your target audience is the developers. Or are you having conversations now that are more, I mean, this is like transformative to industries and disruptive. Are you having conversations higher up in the chain? >> Great, great question. And this is the parallel with Amazon, just like Amazon started with developers, AWS. And then what up to the C-suite, if you will, we're seeing the same exact thing. Obviously our DNA is developer first making it intuitive, natural easy for developers to build on Stripe. But we're seeing more and more C-suite leaders come to us and saying, help us evolve our business model, help us modernize and digitize net new business models to get new revenue streams. So those parallel work streams are both developer mindset and C-suite led is certainly a big evolution for us. And we're looking to learn from our Amazon friends as to the success that they've had there. >> Do you have any examples of projects that developers have proposed that were at first glance, completely outlandish? Something that, you know, is there any sort of corner of the chart use case where Stripe didn't think of it, some developer came up with the idea, maybe it can't be done yet. If you have an example of that, that would be very interesting. >> Yeah, I'll give you two examples. So as I said, we're definitely a user first entity. That's our operating principle. We always think about the user. So let me go to developers and say, what are you struggling with? What are you thinking about? What are the next set of things you need from us? And a simple comment around tax started to come up and do you know in the U S there's 11,000 tax jurisdictions that you and you're selling something online have to abide to these different jurisdictions. So one of the things that we then evolved into is created a Stripe tax product, which initially users or developers were really struggling with and working on. So we created a Stripe tax product. We've done an acquisition called tax jar that helps us accelerate that journey for tax. The other one is this notion of low code that we see in the marketplace right now, where developers saying. Hey, give me more embeddables on top of the primitives that you've created on top of the APIs. So we went leveraging what our customers have already done, created things like a checkout capability, which is a simple redirect highly customized for conversion, which you can just integrate to one API. You have a full checkout capability. You can embed that into your platform, which didn't exist before and needed you to really integrate into different APIs. So all of these capabilities are what developers have really focused on and built that we've done leverage and Excel on. >> Yeah, I think between Lisa and myself, we've paid taxes in about 7,000 of those >> Lisa: Yeah, probably. >> Not 11,000 jurisdictions, but all the various sales taxes and everything else. So we're sort of familiar with it. >> I think so, so here we are, you know, on the floor at re-invent. Great, as we said to be back in person, the 10th annual, but with, as each year goes by AWS has a ecosystem of partners gets bigger and bigger. The flywheel gets, I don't know, I think faster and faster, the number of announcements that came out yesterday and today talk to us about some of the common traits that Stripe and AWS share. >> Yeah. So I've mentioned a few of them. One is certainly the user first mentality where we're listening to users. That tax example is a perfect one of how do we decide new features, new capability based on user first, Amazon does that better than anyone else. Second is that developer mindset focus on the developer. Those will be the core persona we target give you an example, Lyft, we all know Lyft. They wanted to create instant payouts for their drivers. So their developers came to us and say, our developers don't want to get paid. I'm sorry. Our drivers don't want to get paid in a week or two weeks. So we work with their developers who create a instant payout mechanism. Now in six months, over 40% of their drivers are using Stripe instant payout powered by Stripe. And that's a developer first mindset again, back to AWS. And then the third is really around the go to market. And the market opportunity is very similar. You talked about the developer persona and the C-suite very similar to Amazon. But also we're not just catering to enterprise and strategic big customers. We are just so much focused on startups, SMB, mid-market, digital native, just like Amazon is. And I would say the last parallel, which is probably the most important one is innovation. I come from enterprise software where we looked at monthly, quarterly, biannual, annual release cycles. Well, as Stripe, all of that goes out the door just like Amazon. We may have a hundred to a thousand APIs in motion at any time in alpha beta production. And just like Amazon we're iterating and releasing new innovations consistently. So I would say that's probably the most important one that we have with Amazon. >> So a lot of synergies there like deep integrated trusted partner synergies it sounds like. >> Agreed, definitely and then we're seeing this. I was going more as we are going more up market. We're seeing a demand for end to end solutions that require integrations with a CRM vendor for customer 360 with our accounting vendor for pivotal procure order to cash, billing accounting with a e-commerce company like Adobe Magento to do better econ. So more end to end solutions with these tech partners, we're working with our GSI to help deliver those end to end solutions. And certainly, but not least the dev agencies who are still sort of our core constituents that help us keep relevant with those developers. >> You mentioned this at the outset, but some things bear repeating. Can you go into a little more detail on the difference between me wanting to start up a business and take credit cards as payment 10 years ago? Let's say versus today, how much of the friction have you removed from that system? >> It is literally an hour to two hour process versus weeks and months before. >> But what are those steps? Like who would I, you mentioned this, again you mentioned this already, but the go through that, go through that again who would I have to reach out to, to make this happen? And we were talking, you know, relationships with banks, et cetera, et cetera. >> Yeah. So it starts at initiating and registering that company. So imagine you going and having to register a company today, you can do that with a Stripe Atlas product in a matter of hours, get your EIN number, get your tax jurisdictions on your registration as a Delaware entity within the U S you can be anywhere at globally and go do that within a matter of one hour. That's number one, you start there. From there, then it's a matter of embedding payment embeddables within your e-commerce platform, marketplace platform, et cetera. As you've heard us talk about seven lines of code to get payments going, you can quickly onboard accept payments, process payments, reconcile payments all within an hour. And that's just the start. But now you get into more complex use cases around marketplaces and multi-party connection. Multi-party payouts, different commission rates, different subscription models. Think about a flat tier model, a metered tier model, all of these different things that we've abstracted and allow you to just use one to three different integrations to help accelerate and use that in your digital commerce platform. So all of these different workflows have is what we've automated through our APIs. >> Dave: That's unbelievable. >> Yeah. >> It really is. >> It is unbelievable, the amount of automation and innovation that's gone on in such a short time period. What are some of the things as we kind of wrap up here that we can look forward to from stripe from a roadmap perspective, technology wise, partner wise? >> Yes. I mean, we have a slew of data you can imagine billions of billions of transactional data. And you guys know what we do with data is we're looking at fraud prevention. We're looking at, we have a product called radar that looks at fraud, we're doing acceptance, adaptive acceptance to do more AIML learned data and authorization. We're also looking at how do we feed a lot of this financial data into the right mechanisms to allow you to then create new business models on top of this, whether it's cross sell upsell to new user business capture. As well as you know, one of the things I did not talk about, which coming from a farming background is this notion of Stripe climate. Where we have upwards of 2000 companies across 37 countries that are leveraging our Stripe climate product to give back to tech advanced companies that are helping in carbon offset. And super exciting times there from an ESG environmental social governance point of view. So all of those combined is what excites us about the future at Stripe. >> Wow. The future seems unlimited. Lots going on. >> Super excited. Zaki, thank you so much for joining Dave and me talking about what's going on with Stripe. All the innovation that's going on. The synergies with AWS and what's coming down the pipe. We appreciate your insights and your time. >> Thank you, Lisa, thank you, David. Appreciated All right. For Dave Nicholson, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the Cube. The global leader in live tech coverage. (lighthearted piano music)

Published Date : Dec 2 2021

SUMMARY :

back to Las Vegas. on the cube at AWS remit. Pleasure to be here. you can, it's not the same. the last couple of days that Talk to us about Stripe, So that's the core essence of Stripe evolved in the last 10 years So as you can imagine audience is the developers. C-suite leaders come to us of the chart use case where So one of the things that So we're sort of familiar with it. I think so, so here we are, you know, So their developers came to us and say, So a lot of synergies So more end to end solutions how much of the friction have hour to two hour process And we were talking, you know, So imagine you going and having What are some of the things as to allow you to then Lots going on. Zaki, thank you so much The global leader in live tech coverage.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

ZakiPERSON

0.99+

Zaki BajwaPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

DeliverooORGANIZATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

one hourQUANTITY

0.99+

13 secondsQUANTITY

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

LyftORGANIZATION

0.99+

second areaQUANTITY

0.99+

FordORGANIZATION

0.99+

two weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

11,000 tax jurisdictionsQUANTITY

0.99+

ShopifyORGANIZATION

0.99+

Patrick CollisonPERSON

0.99+

two hourQUANTITY

0.99+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

11,000 jurisdictionsQUANTITY

0.99+

DelawareLOCATION

0.99+

an hourQUANTITY

0.99+

AdobeORGANIZATION

0.99+

a weekQUANTITY

0.99+

6,000 employeesQUANTITY

0.99+

AmazonsORGANIZATION

0.99+

ExcelTITLE

0.99+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

SecondQUANTITY

0.99+

each yearQUANTITY

0.99+

two examplesQUANTITY

0.99+

thirdQUANTITY

0.99+

seven linesQUANTITY

0.99+

10 years agoDATE

0.99+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.99+

ThirdQUANTITY

0.99+

first areaQUANTITY

0.98+

37 countriesQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

2000 companiesQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

U SLOCATION

0.98+

two brothersQUANTITY

0.98+

five ninesQUANTITY

0.98+

Kenneth Chestnut, Stripe | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

>>Welcome everybody to the cubes live coverage of AWS reinvent 2021. We're here in the main hall. Yes, this is a physical event. It's a hybrid event, probably the industry's most important hybrid event in the year. We're super excited to be here. Of course, last year during the lockdown, reinvent was purely virtual. This year. They go in hybrid 20 plus thousand people. I hear the whisper numbers like 25, 20 7,000 hundreds of thousands of people online. The cubes here, two sets, we've got two remote studios, super excited. I'd like to introduce my co-host David Nicholson. He'll be here all week with us. Uh, John furrier is also here, Lisa Martin for the cubes wall-to-wall coverage. And we're so psyched to start off this session with Kenneth Chestnut. Who's the head of technology partnerships at Stripe. Stripe's an amazing company, Ken. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >>Thanks for having me, Dave and David. I greatly appreciate it. How about this? >>Right. Finally live event. We've done a few. We probably done four or five this year, but >>It's good to be back in person. It is. Yeah, absolutely. It's >>A Stripe. I mean, wow. Can a powering the new economy. Tell us a little bit more for those people who may not be familiar with Stripe. They probably use it without even knowing it when they sign it away. Yeah. So tell us about the >>Well, uh, Stripe was founded in 2010 by two brothers, Patrick and John Colson. And really it was from their first business and realizing how hard it was to actually charge for things on online. Um, you had to acquire a relationship with, uh, with a gateway provider to accept payments. You had to acquire a relationship with a, with a acquiring bank. Um, and you had to do that for each and every country that you wanted to service. Uh, so the same way that AWS reduced the barrier in terms of not having to procure, spend millions of dollars on storage, computers, networking, uh, effectively, what we we've done at Stripe is reduce the barriers around economic infrastructure, accepting payments online, >>Use that undifferentiated heavy lifting for payments. So describe Ken, what it was like kind of pre Stripe. You would literally have to install servers, get storage and put, put software on there, get a database. And then what if you had any money left over, you can actually do some business, but, but describe the sort of what the experience is like with Stripe. >>Sure. So, uh, the R R with, with Stripe, we literally talk about seven lines of code. So we, we allow any developer to, um, uh, provide a set of APIs for any developer to accept payments on online. And we do the undifferentiated heavy lifting in terms of accepting payments, accepting those payments, processing them revenue, reporting, and reconciliation, um, all ensuring compliance and security. Um, so it's like you said, uh, taking care of the undifferentiated heavy lifting are around accepting payments online in the enabling >>The enabler. There is the cloud. I mean, it was 2009, 2010. You guys were founded, the cloud was only like three years old. Right. And so you had to really sort of take a chance on leveraging the cloud or maybe early on you just installed it yourself and said, this isn't going to scale. So maybe tell us how you sort of leverage the cloud. >>Sure. Um, so we're a long time, uh, AWS, uh, customer and user, um, uh, back in the early days of, of Stripe in the early days of, of AWS. And we've just grown, uh, with, with AWS and the ecosystem. And it's interesting because a lot of, uh, a lot of the companies that have been built on, on AWS and grown to be successful, they're also Stripe customers as well. So they use Stripe for their economic infrastructure. >>We use Stripe, we run our company on AWS and we use Stripe. It it's true. The integration took like minutes. It was so simple. Hey it, test it, make sure it scales. But so what, what's the stack look like? What is there, is there such thing as a payment stack? What's the technology stuff? >>Sure. So we initially started with payments and being able to accept payments, uh, on online. Uh we've we brought in out our, our, our Stripe product portfolio now to effectively provide economic, uh, infrastructure for the internet. So that could be accepting payments. Uh, it could be setting up marketplaces. So companies like Lyft and Deliveroo, uh, use Stripe to power their marketplaces with their, with their drivers and, and, um, uh, delivers, um, uh, we provide, uh, a product called radar that, uh, that, um, prevents fraud, uh, around, around the globe. Um, based upon the data that we're seeing from our, from our customers, um, we have, uh, issuing and treasury so that companies can provide their users or their merchants with banking services. So loans, uh, issuing credit cards. So we we've really broadened out the product portfolio of Stripe to provide sort of economic infrastructure for the internet. So >>We talked about strike being in the cloud from an infrastructure perspective and how that enables certain things, but that in and of itself, doesn't change the dynamics around sovereignty and governance from country to country. Sure. Uh, I imagine that the global nature of AWS sort of dovetails with your strategy, but how, how do you address that? It's one thing to tell me in Northern California, you can process payments for me, but now globally go across 150 countries. How do you make that work? Yeah, >>Uh, absolutely. So we, we establish relationships, uh, within, within each company country that we operate in we're in about 47, uh, countries, uh, today, um, and that's rapidly expanding so that companies can, can process or accept payments and do, uh, financial transactions within, within, within those countries. So we're in 47 countries today. We, we accept a multitude of different payment, uh, different currencies, different payment types. So the U S is very, uh, credit card focused. But if you go to other, other parts of the globe, it could be a debit cards. It could be, um, uh, wallets, uh, uh, Google pay, Ali pay, uh, others. So really it's, uh, providing sort of the payment methods that users prefer in, in the different countries, uh, and meeting and meeting those users where, where they are. >>Are you out of the box compliant? What integration is required to do that? Uh, what about things like data sovereignty, is that taken care of by the cloud provider or you guys, and where, w w where does, where does AWS end and you guys pick up? Yes, >>We're, we're PCI compliant. Um, we, we leverage AWS as our, as our infrastructure, um, to grow, grow and scale. So, um, one of the things that we're, we're proud of is, uh, through, throughout 2020 and 2021, we've, we've had 11 nines of, uh, of, of, uh, or five nines of uptime, um, even through, um, uh, black Friday and cyber Monday. So providing AWS provides that, that infrastructure, which we built on top of to provide, uh, you know, five nines of uptime for our, for our users. >>You describe in more detail, Kenya, your ecosystem. I mean, you're responsible for tech partnerships. What does that ecosystem, how I paint a picture of it? >>Sure. So, um, uh, a number of users want to be able to use Stripe with, with their other, uh, it infrastructure and, and their business processes. So a customer may start, uh, with a salesperson may start with a quote or order, uh, in, in Salesforce, want to automate the invoicing and billing and payment of that with, with Stripe and then, uh, reconcile re revenue and an ERP solution like SAP or Oracle or NetSuite or into it, um, in the case of, of small, medium businesses. So really, um, what we're focused on is building out that, that ecosystem to allow, uh, um, our, our customers to streamline their business processes, um, and, and integrate Stripe into their existing it infrastructure and, and business processes. >>You mentioned a lot of different services, but broadly speaking, if I think about payments, correct me if I'm wrong, but you were one of the early, uh, sort of software companies, if I can call you that, um, platforms, whatever, but to really focus on a usage based pricing, but how do I, how do I engage with you? What's, what's the pricing model. Maybe you could describe that a little. >>Sure. So the pricing model is very, very transparent. Uh, it's on, it's on the website. So, uh, we, we take a, um, a percentage of each transaction. So literally you can, you can set up a, a Stripe account it's self-service, um, uh, we, we take a 2.9% plus 30 cents on every, uh, Tran transaction. Um, we don't, you don't start getting, um, uh, charged until, uh, you start accepting payments from your, from your customers or from your users. >>Um, can you give us a sense of the business scope, maybe any metrics you can share, customers, whatever. >>Sure. So there's a couple of things we can share publicly, just in terms of the size of the business. I think since, uh, since 2020, uh, more than 2 million businesses have launched on, on Stripe. Uh, so, uh, 2 million in, in, in, in 2020, um, we've, uh, uh, in the past 12 months, we've, uh, uh, uh, processed over 173 billion, uh, API calls. Uh, we do we process about, um, uh, hundreds of billions of, of, of, uh, payment volume, uh, every, every year. Um, if you look at sort of the macros of the business, the business is growing faster than the broader e-commerce space. So the amount of payment volume that we did in this past year is more than the entire industry did when Patrick and John founded the company. And in 2010, just to give you a, uh, an idea of the, the, the size of the business and sort of the pace of the business >>You're growing as e-commerce grows, but you're also stealing share from other sort of traditional payment systems. Okay. So that's a nice flywheel effect. And of course, Stripe's a private company they've raised well over a billion dollars of Peter teal, and it wasn't original founders, so are funders. So, you know, that's, he's talking scale. I want to go back to something you said about radar. Sure. So there's tech in your stack fraud detection, right. So some of >>That in machine learning, right. >>So, and so you guys, I mean, are you a technology company, are you a F a FinTech company? What are you? >>We're a software company. We provide software and we provide technology for developers, uh, to make online businesses and make, uh, uh, commerce, uh, more seamless and more frictionless >>Cloud-first API first. I mean, maybe describe how that is different maybe than, you know, the technical debt that's been built up over, you know, decades with traditional payment systems. >>Yes, it's very similar to the early, earlier days of AWS where a lot of tech forward companies leveraged Stripe, um, to, um, whether it be large enterprises to transform their businesses and move online, or, or, uh, uh, startups and developers that want to, uh, start a new business online and, and do that, uh, as quickly and seamlessly as possible. So it's, it's quite the gamut from large enterprises that are digitally transforming themselves companies like Marske and, and NASDAQ and others, as well as, uh, um, startups and developers that have started their businesses and born on born on Stripe. So >>When you talk about a startup, how small of an entity makes sense, uh, when you think of, if you look at, from an economic perspective, lowering the friction associated with transactions can lift up a large part of the world with sort of, you know, w with very, very small businesses. Is that something that this is all about? >>Yeah, absolutely. So, like I said, you know, two, 2 million business have sub launched on, on, on Stripe, uh, in, in the past year. And, and those businesses vary, but it could be literally a, a developer or a, uh, uh, a small, uh, SMB that wants to be able to accept payments on online. And it can just set up a Stripe account and start accepting payments. >>Yeah. So this is not a one hit wonder, um, lay out the vision for Stripe, right? I mean, you're, you're a platform, uh, you're, you're becoming a fundamental ingredient of the digital economy sounds pre pandemic. That was all a bunch of buzzwords, but today we all know how important that is, but what lay out the vision for us can, >>Yeah, it really are. The mission of Stripe is to grow the GDP of the internet. Um, and, and so what that means is, uh, more and more our, our, our basic belief is more and more and more businesses, uh, will, will, uh, go, go online, uh, with, uh, with the pandemic that that was, uh, accelerated. But I think that the general trend of businesses moving online, uh, will continue to accelerate, and we want to provide, uh, economic infrastructure to support those businesses. Um, you know, um, uh, uh, Andreessen talked about sort of software, software eating the world well fit. Our belief has FinTech is eating software. So in, in the fullness of time, I think the opportunity is for, uh, any, any company to be a financial services company. And we want to empower any company that wants to, or any user that wants to be a financial services company to, to provide the economic infrastructure for them to do so. >>And, and, you know, I mean your data company in that sense, you're moving bits around, you know, and those datas, I like to say data's eating software, you know, cause really you gotta have your data act together. Absolutely. And that's an evolving, I mean, you guys started to, to 2010, I would imagine your data strategy has evolved quite dramatically. Yeah. >>It's a great, it's a great call out Dave. Uh, one of our other products is a product called Sigma. So Sigma allows, uh, merchants or our customers to query payment and transaction data. So they want to be able to understand who, who, who are their customers, what are the payment methods that those customers prefer in different countries, in different regions? Um, so we're, we're starting to have some interesting use cases, um, working with, with AWS and other partners when you can start combining payment and transaction data in Stripe with other data to understand customer segmentation, customer 360 lifetime value of a customer customer acquisition costs, being able to close the books faster in your ERP, because you can apply that payment and transaction data to your general ledger to, to close the books faster at the end of the month or at the end of the, at the end of the year. So, uh, yeah, we we're, um, uh, as, as more and more companies are using Stripe, um, they want to be able to take advantage of that data and combine it with other, other sources of data to drive business. >>Yeah. You mentioned some of those key metrics that are, that are so important to companies today. I'll give you the last word re-invent this hall is packed, um, a little bit surprising, frankly, you know, but, uh, but exciting. Uh, what are you looking forward to this? >>Yeah, I'm just looking forward to meeting people in person again, it's, uh, it's great to be here and, and, you know, uh, uh, we have a strong relationship with AWS. We have lots of partners in, in, in common here, uh, as well, both consulting partners and technology partners. So really looking forward to meeting with partners and customers, and especially as we, as we plan for next year and, uh, launching our, our, our partner program beginning of next year. Uh, there's a lot of, uh, uh, groundwork and things to learn from, from here. As we, as we, we, we, we launch our, our, our partner business formula next >>I'll bet. Looking forward to that, Ken, thanks so much for coming to the cure. You so much. It was great to have a chat at the time. All right. And we want to thank our sponsors, uh, AWS, of course, and also AMD who's making the editorial segments that we bring you this week possible for Dave Nicholson. I'm Dave Volante. You're watching the cube at AWS reinvent 2021. Keep it right there, right back.

Published Date : Nov 30 2021

SUMMARY :

Uh, John furrier is also here, Lisa Martin for the cubes wall-to-wall coverage. I greatly appreciate it. We probably done four or five this year, It's good to be back in person. Can a powering the new economy. Um, and you had to do that for each and every country that you wanted to service. And then what if you had any money left over, you can actually do some business, but, but describe the sort of what Um, so it's like you said, uh, taking care of the undifferentiated heavy lifting are around So maybe tell us how you sort of leverage the cloud. And it's interesting because a lot of, uh, a lot of the companies that have been built on, What's the technology stuff? a product called radar that, uh, that, um, prevents fraud, It's one thing to tell me in Northern California, you can process payments for me, So really it's, uh, providing sort of the payment methods that users which we built on top of to provide, uh, you know, five nines of uptime for our, You describe in more detail, Kenya, your ecosystem. So a customer may start, uh, with a salesperson may start with a quote or order, if I can call you that, um, platforms, whatever, but to really focus on a usage So literally you can, you can set up a, a Stripe account it's self-service, Um, can you give us a sense of the business scope, maybe any metrics you can share, And in 2010, just to give you a, uh, an idea of the, I want to go back to something you said about radar. uh, to make online businesses and make, uh, uh, commerce, you know, the technical debt that's been built up over, you know, decades with traditional So it's, it's quite the gamut from large uh, when you think of, if you look at, from an economic perspective, lowering the friction associated with transactions So, like I said, you know, two, 2 million business have sub launched on, on, ingredient of the digital economy sounds pre pandemic. in the fullness of time, I think the opportunity is for, uh, any, any company to be a financial I mean, you guys started to, to 2010, I would imagine your data strategy So Sigma allows, uh, merchants or our customers to query Uh, what are you looking forward to this? Yeah, I'm just looking forward to meeting people in person again, it's, uh, it's great to be here and, the editorial segments that we bring you this week possible for Dave Nicholson.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
David NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Dave VolantePERSON

0.99+

2010DATE

0.99+

PatrickPERSON

0.99+

Kenneth ChestnutPERSON

0.99+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.99+

NASDAQORGANIZATION

0.99+

KenPERSON

0.99+

Northern CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

LyftORGANIZATION

0.99+

John ColsonPERSON

0.99+

DeliverooORGANIZATION

0.99+

2009DATE

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

MarskeORGANIZATION

0.99+

2.9%QUANTITY

0.99+

SigmaORGANIZATION

0.99+

30 centsQUANTITY

0.99+

25QUANTITY

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

150 countriesQUANTITY

0.99+

AMDORGANIZATION

0.99+

two setsQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

first businessQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

360QUANTITY

0.99+

two brothersQUANTITY

0.99+

AndreessenPERSON

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

over 173 billionQUANTITY

0.98+

This yearDATE

0.98+

fiveQUANTITY

0.98+

47 countriesQUANTITY

0.98+

2 millionQUANTITY

0.98+

two remote studiosQUANTITY

0.98+

John furrierPERSON

0.98+

U SORGANIZATION

0.98+

millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

each transactionQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

20 plus thousand peopleQUANTITY

0.97+

11 ninesQUANTITY

0.97+

fourQUANTITY

0.97+

KenyaLOCATION

0.96+

each company countryQUANTITY

0.96+

hundreds of billionsQUANTITY

0.95+

eachQUANTITY

0.95+

one thingQUANTITY

0.95+

Eleanor Dorfman, Retool | AWS re:Invent 2022


 

(gentle music) >> Good morning from Las Vegas. It's theCUBE live at AWS Reinvent 2022 with tons of thousands of people today. Really kicks off the event. Big keynote that I think is probably just wrapping up. Lisa Martin here with Dave Vellante. Dave, this is going to be an action packed week on theCUBE no doubt. We talked with so many different companies. Every company's a software company these days but we're also seeing a lot of companies leaving software that can help them operate more efficiently in the background. >> Yeah, well some things haven't changed at Reinvent. A lot of people here, you know, back to 2019 highs and I think we exceeded those two hour keynotes. Peter DeSantis last night talking about new Graviton instances and then Adam Selipsky doing the typical two hour keynote. But what was different he was a lot more poetic than we used to hear from Andy Jassy, right? He was talking about the universe as an analogy for data. >> I loved that. >> Talked about ocean exploration as for the security piece and then exploring into the Antarctic for, you know, better chips, you know? So yeah, I think he did a good job there. I think a lot of people might not love it but I thought it was very well done. >> I thought so too. We're having kicking off a great day of live content for you all day today. We've got Eleanor Dorfman joining us, the sales leader at Retool. Eleanor, welcome to theCUBE. It's great to have you. >> Thank you so much for having me. >> So let's talk a little bit about Retool. I was looking on your LinkedIn page. I love the tagline, build custom internal tools best. >> Eleanor: Yep. >> Talk to us a little bit about the company you recently raised, series C two. Give us the backstory. >> Yeah, so the company was founded in 2017 by two co-founders who are best friends from college. They actually set out to build a FinTech company, a payments company. And as they were building that, they needed to build a ton of custom operations software that goes with that. If you're going to be managing people's money, you need to be able to do refunds. You need to be able to look up accounts, you need to be able to detect fraud, you need to do know your customer operations. And as they were building the sort of operations software that supports the business, they realized that there were patterns to all of it and that the same components were used at and again. And had the insight that that was actually probably a better direction to go in than recreating Venmo, which was I think the original idea. And that actually this is a problem every company has because every company needs operations engineering and operations software to run their business. And so they pivoted and started building Retool which is a platform for building custom operations software or internal tools. >> Dave: Good pivot. >> In hindsight, actually probably in the moment as well, was a good pivot. >> But you know, when you talk about some of those things, refunds, fraud, you know, KYC, you know, you think of operations software, you think of it as just internal, but all those things are customer facing. >> Eleanor: Yep. >> Right so, are we seeing as sort of this new era? Is that a trend that you guys, your founders saw that hey, these internal operations can be pointed at customers to support what, a better customer service, maybe even generate revenue, subscriptions? >> I think it's a direction we're actually heading now but we're just starting to scratch the surface of that. The focus for the last five years has very much been on this operations software and sort of changing the economics of developing it and making it easy and fast to productize workflows that were previously being done in spreadsheets or hacky workarounds and make it easier for companies to prioritize those so they can run their business more efficiently. >> And where are you having your customer conversations these days? Thinking of operations software in the background, but to Dave's point, it ends up being part of the customer experience. So where are you having your customer conversations, target audience, who's that persona? >> Mainly developers. So we're working almost exclusively with developer teams who have backlogs and backlogs of internal tools requests to build that sales teams are building manual forecasts. Support teams are in 19 different tools. Their supply chain teams are using seven different spreadsheets to do demand forecasting or freight forwarding or things like that. But they've never been able to be prioritized to the top of the list because customer facing software, revenue generating software, always takes prioritization. And in this economic environment, which is challenging for many companies right now, it's important to be able to do more with less and maximize the productivity especially of high value employees like engineers and developers. >> So what would you say the biggest business outcomes are? If the developer is really the focus, productivity is the- >> Productivity. It's for both, I would say. Developer productivity and being able to maximize your sort of R and D and maximize the productivity of your engineers and take away some of the very boring parts of the job. But, so I would say developer productivity, but then also the tools and the software that they're building are very powerful for end users. So I would say efficiency and productivity across your business. >> Across the business. >> I mean historically, you know, operations is where we focused IT and code. How much of the code out there is dedicated to sort of operations versus that customer facing? >> So I think it would actually be, it's kind of surprising. We have run a few surveys on this sort of, we call them the state of engineering time, and focusing on what developers are spending their time on. And a third of all code that is being written today is actually for this internal operations software. >> Interesting. And do you guys have news at the show? Are you announcing anything interesting or? >> Yeah, so our focus historically, you sort of gave away with one of your early questions, but our focus has always been on this operations, this building web applications on building UIs on top of databases and APIs and doing that incredibly fast and being able to do it all in one place and integrate with as any data source that you need. We abstract away access authentication deployment and you build applications for your internal teams. But recently, we've launched two new products. We're actually supporting more external use cases and more customer facing use cases as well as automating CRON jobs, ETL jobs alerting with the new retail workflows product. So we're expanding the scope of operations software from web applications to also internal operations like CRON jobs and ETL jobs. >> Explain that. Explain the scourge of CRON jobs to the audience. >> Yeah, so operations software businesses run on operations software. It's interesting, zooming out, it's actually something you said earlier as well. Every company has become a software company. So when you think about software, you tend to think about here. Very cool software that people are selling. And software that you use as a consumer. But Coca-Cola for example, has hundreds of software engineers that are building tools to make the business run for forecasting, for demand gen, for their warehouse distribution and monitoring inventory. And there's two types of that. There's the applications that they build and then the operations that have to run behind that. Maybe a workflow that is detecting how many bottles of Coca-Cola are in every warehouse and sending a notification to the right person when they're out or when they, a refill is very strong, but you know when you need a refill. So it does that, it takes those tasks, those jobs that run in the background and enables you to customize them and build them very rapidly in a code first way. >> So some of the notes that you guys provided say that there's over 500 million software apps that are going to be built in the next few years alone. That's tremendous. How much of that is operation software? >> I mean I think at least a third of that, if not more. To the point where every company is being forced to maximize their resources today and operational efficiency is the way to do that. And so it can become a competitive advantage when you can take the things that humans are doing in spreadsheets with 19 open tabs and automate that. That saves hours a day. That's a significant, significant driver of efficiency and productivity for a business >> It does, and there's direct correlation to the customer experience. The use experience. >> Almost certainly. When you think about building support tooling, I was web chat, chatting on the with Gogo wifi support on my flight over here and they asked for my order number and I sent it and they looked up my account and that's a custom piece of software they were using to look up the account, create a new account for me, and restore my second wifi purchase. And so when you think about it, you're actually, even just as a consumer, interacting with this custom software on the day time. And that's because that's what companies use to have a good customer experience and have an efficient business. >> And what's the relationship with AWS? You guys started, I think you said 2017, so you obviously started in the cloud, but I'm particularly interested in from a seller perspective, what that's like. Working with Amazon, how's that affected your business? >> Yeah, I mean so we're built on AWS, so we're customers and big fans. And obviously like from a selling perspective, we have a ton of integrations with AWS so we're able to integrate directly into all the different AWS products that people are using for databases, for data warehouses, for deployment configurations, for monitoring, for security, for observability, we can basically fit into your existing AWS stack in order to make it as seamless integration with your software so that building in Retool is just as seamless as building it on your own, just much, much faster. >> So in your world, I know you wanted to but, in your world is it more analytics? is it more transactional, sort of? Is it both? >> It's all of the above. And I think what's, over Thanksgiving, I was asked a lot to explain what Retool did with people who were like, we just got our first iPhone. And so I tried to explain with an example because I have yet to stumble on the perfect metaphor. But the example I typically use is DoorDash is a customer of ours. And for about three years, and three years ago, they had a problem. They had no way of turning off delivery in certain zip codes during storms. Which as someone who has had orders canceled during a storm, it's an incredibly frustrating experience. And the way it worked is that they had operation team members manually submitting requests to engineers to say there's a storm in this zip code and an engineer would run a manual task. This didn't scale with Doordash as they were opening in new countries all over the world that have very different weather patterns. And so they looked, they had one, they were sort of confronted with a choice. They could buy a piece of software out of the box. There is not a startup that does this yet. They could build it by hand, which would mean scoping the requirements designing a UI, building authentication, building access controls, putting it into a, putting it into a sprint, assigning an engineer. This would've taken months and months. And then it would take just as long to iterate on it or they could use Retool. So they used Retool, they built this app, it saved, I think they were saying up to two years of engineering time for this one application because of how quickly it was. And since then they've built, I think 50 or 60 more automating away other tasks like that that were one out of spreadsheets or in Jira or in Slack notifications or an email saying, "Hey, could you please do this thing? There's a storm." And so now they use us for dozens and dozens of operations like that. >> A lot of automation and of course a lot of customer delight on the other end of the spectrum as you were talking about. It is frustrating when you don't get that order but it's also the company needs to be able to have the the tools in place to automate to be able to react quickly. >> Eleanor: Exactly. >> Because the consumers are, as we know, quite demanding. I wanted to ask you, I mentioned the tagline in the beginning, build custom internal tools fast. You just gave us a great example of DoorDash. Huge business outcomes they're achieving but how fast are we talking? How fast can the average developer build these internal tools? >> Well, we've been doing a fun thing at our booth where we ask people what a problem is and build a tool for them while we're there. So for something lightweight, you can build it in 10 minutes. For something a little more complex, it can take up to a few weeks depending on what the requirements are. But we all have people who will be on a call with us introducing them to our software for the first time and they'll start telling us about their problems and in the background we'll be building it and then at the end we're like, is this what you meant? And they're like, we'd like to add that to our cart. And obviously, it's a platform so you can't do that. But we've been able to build applications on a call before while people are telling us what they need. >> So fast is fast. >> I would say very fast, yeah. >> Now how do you price? >> Right now, we have a couple different plans. We actually have a motion where you can sign up on our website and get started. So we have a free plan, we've got plans for startups, and then we've got plans all the way up to the enterprise. >> Right. And that's a subscription pricing kind of thing? >> Subscription model, yes. >> So I get a subscription to the platform and then what? Is there also a consumption component? >> Exactly. So there's a consumption component as well. So there's access to the platform and then you can build as many applications as you need. Or build as many workflows. >> When you're having customer conversations with prospects, what do you define as Retool's superpowers? You're the sales leader. What are some of those key superpowers that you think really differentiate Retool? >> I do think, well, the sales team first and foremost, but that's not a fair answer. I would say that people are a bit differentiator though. We have a lot of very talented people who are have a ton of domain expertise and care a ton about the customer outcomes, which I do actually think is a little more rare than it should be. But we're one of the only products out there that's built with a developer first mindset, a varied code first mindset, built to integrate with your software development life cycle but also built with the security and robustness that enterprise companies require. So it's able to take an enterprise grade software with a developer first approach while still having a ton of agility and nimbleness which is what people are really craving as the earth keeps moving around them. So I would say that's something that really sets us apart from the field. >> And then talk about some of the what developers are saying, some of the feedback, some of the responses, and maybe even, I know we're just on day one of the show, but any feedback from the booth so far? >> We've had a few people swing by our booth and show us their Retool apps, which is incredibly cool. That's my absolute favorite thing is encountering a Retool application in the wild which happens a lot more than I would've thought, which I shouldn't say, but is incredibly rewarding. But people love it. It's the reason I joined is I'd never heard someone have a product that customers talked about the way they talk about Retool because Retool enables them to do things. For some folks who use it, it enables them to do something they previously couldn't do. So it gives them super powers in their job and to triple their impact. And then for others, it just makes things so fast. And it's a very delightful experience. It's very much built by developers, for developers. And so it's built with a developer's first mindset. And so I think it's quite fun to build in Retool. Even I can build and Retool, though not well. And then it's extremely impactful and people are able to really impact their business and delight their coworkers which I think can be really meaningful. >> Absolutely. Delighting the coworkers directly relates to delighting the customers. >> Eleanor: Exactly. >> Those customer experience, employee experience, they're like this. >> Eleanor: Exactly. >> They go hand in hand and the employee experience has to be outstanding to be able to delight those customers, to reduce churn, to increase revenue- >> Eleanor: Exactly. >> And for brand reputation. >> And it also, I think there is something as someone who is customer facing, when my coworkers and developers I work with build tools that enable me to do my job better and feel better about my own performance and my ability to impact the customer experience, it's just this incredibly virtuous cycle. >> So Retool.com is where folks can go to learn more and also try that subscription that you said was free for up to five users. >> Yes, exactly. >> All right. I guess my last question, well couple questions for you. What are some of the things that excited you that you heard from Adam Selipsky this morning? Anything from the keynote that stood out in terms of- >> Dave: Did you listen to the keynote? >> I did not. I had customer calls this morning. >> Okay, so they're bringing- >> East coast time, east coast time. >> One of the things that will excite you I think is they're connecting, making it easier to connect their databases. >> Eleanor: That would very much exciting. >> Aurora and Redshift, right? Okay. And they're making it easier to share data. I dunno if it goes across regions, but they're doing better integration. >> Amazing. >> Right? And you guys are integrating with those tools, right? Those data platforms. So that to me was a big thing for you guys. >> It is also and what a big thing Retool does is you can build a UI layer for your application on top of every single data source. And you hear, it's funny, you hear people talk about the 360 degree review of the customer so much. This is another, it's not our primary value proposition, but it is certainly another way to get there is if you have data from their desk tickets from in Redshift, you have data from Stripe, from their payments, you have data from Twilio from their text messages, you have data from DataDog where they're having your observability where you can notice analytics issues. You can actually just use Retool to build an app that sits on top of that so that you can give your support team, your sales team, your account management team, customer service team, all of the data that they need on their customers. And then you can build workflows so that you can do automated customer engagement reports. I did a Slack every week that shows what our top customers are doing with the product and that's built using all of our automation software as well. >> The integration is so important, as you just articulated, because every, you know, we say every company's a software company these days. Every company's a data company. But also, the data democratization that needs to happen to be able for lines of business so that data moves out of certain locked in functions and enables lines of business to use it. To get that visibility that you were just talking about is really going to be a competitive advantage for those that survive and thrive and grow in this market. >> It's able to, I think it's first it's visibility, but then it's action. And I think that's what Retool does very uniquely as well is it can take and unite the data from all the places, takes it out of the black box, puts it in front of the teams, and then enables them to act on it safely and securely. So not only can you see who might be fraudulent, you can flag them as fraud. Not only can you see who's actually in danger, you can click a button and send them an email and set up a meeting. You can set up an approval workflow to bring in an exec for engagement. You can update a password for someone in one place where you can see that they're having issues and not have to go somewhere else to update the password. So I think that's the key is that Retool can unlock the data visibility and then the action that you need to serve your customers. >> That's a great point. It's all about the actions, the insights that those actions can be acted upon. Last question for you. If you had a billboard that you could put any message that you want on Retool, what would it say? What's the big aha? This is why Retool is so great. >> I mean, I think the big thing about Retool is it's changing the economics of software development. It takes something that previously would've been below the line and that wouldn't get prioritized because it wasn't customer facing and makes it possible. And so I would say one of two billboards if I could be a little bit greedy, one would be Retool changed the economics of software development and one would be build operations software at the speed of thought. >> I love that. You're granted two billboards. >> Eleanor: Thank you. >> Those are both outstanding. Eleanor, it's been such a pleasure having you on the program. Thank you for talking to us about Retool. >> Eleanor: Thank you. >> Operations software and the massive impact that automating it can make for developers, businesses alike, all the way to the top line. We appreciate your insights. >> Thank you so much. >> For our guests and Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE, the leader in live, emerging, and enterprise tech coverage. (gentle music)

Published Date : Nov 29 2022

SUMMARY :

Dave, this is going to be an A lot of people here, you exploration as for the security piece day of live content for you I love the tagline, build about the company you and that the same components probably in the moment as well, But you know, when you talk and sort of changing the And where are you having your customer and maximize the productivity and maximize the productivity How much of the code out there and focusing on what developers And do you guys have news at the show? and you build applications Explain the scourge of And software that you use as a consumer. that you guys provided is the way to do that. to the customer experience. And so when you think about it, so you obviously started in the cloud, into all the different AWS products And the way it worked is that but it's also the company I mentioned the tagline in the beginning, and in the background we'll be building it where you can sign up on And that's a platform and then you can build that you think really built to integrate with your and to triple their impact. Delighting the coworkers they're like this. and my ability to impact that you said was free that excited you that you heard I had customer calls this morning. One of the things that easier to share data. So that to me was a so that you can give your and enables lines of business to use it. and then the action that you any message that you want on is it's changing the economics I love that. Thank you for talking to us about Retool. and the massive impact that automating it and enterprise tech coverage.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

EleanorPERSON

0.99+

Andy JassyPERSON

0.99+

Adam SelipskyPERSON

0.99+

2017DATE

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Peter DeSantisPERSON

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

Eleanor DorfmanPERSON

0.99+

dozensQUANTITY

0.99+

Coca-ColaORGANIZATION

0.99+

two typesQUANTITY

0.99+

50QUANTITY

0.99+

19 different toolsQUANTITY

0.99+

AntarcticLOCATION

0.99+

360 degreeQUANTITY

0.99+

two hourQUANTITY

0.99+

10 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

RetoolTITLE

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.99+

19 open tabsQUANTITY

0.99+

DataDogORGANIZATION

0.98+

RetoolORGANIZATION

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

ThanksgivingEVENT

0.98+

RedshiftTITLE

0.98+

two co-foundersQUANTITY

0.98+

seven different spreadsheetsQUANTITY

0.98+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.98+

JiraTITLE

0.98+

last nightDATE

0.97+

LinkedInORGANIZATION

0.97+

CRONTITLE

0.97+

over 500 million software appsQUANTITY

0.97+

2019DATE

0.97+

DoordashORGANIZATION

0.97+

first approachQUANTITY

0.96+

this morningDATE

0.96+

one applicationQUANTITY

0.96+

two billboardsQUANTITY

0.96+

tons of thousands of peopleQUANTITY

0.95+

two new productsQUANTITY

0.95+

first wayQUANTITY

0.95+

DoorDashORGANIZATION

0.94+

GogoORGANIZATION

0.94+

ReinventEVENT

0.94+

SlackTITLE

0.93+

one placeQUANTITY

0.93+

Lea Purcell, Foursquare | AWS Marketplace Seller Conference 2022


 

>>Welcome back everyone to the cubes coverage here in Seattle, Washington for AWS's marketplace seller conference. The big news here is that the Amazon partner network and marketplace coming together and reorganizing into one organization, the AIST partner organization, APO bringing together the best of the partnership and the marketplace to sell through. It's a sellers company. This is the second year, but technically with COVID, I call it a year and a half. This is the cube. I'm John for your host. Got a great guest, Leah for sale vice president of business development at four square. Leah, thanks for coming on the cube. Look great. Yeah. >>Hey, thanks. Thanks for having me here. >>So four square, everyone, and that has internet history knows you. You check in you'd become the mayor of a place right back in the day, all fun. It was a great app and I think it was competitor go sold the Facebook, but that was the beginning of location data. Now you got Uber apps, you got all apps, location, everywhere. Data is big here in the marketplace. They sell data, they got a data exchange, Chris head of marketplaces. Like we have all these things we're gonna bring 'em together, make it simpler. So you're on the data side. I'm assuming you're selling data and you're participating at the data exchange. What is Foursquare doing right now? Yeah, >>Exactly. So we are part of the data exchange. And you mentioned checking in. So we, we are really proud of our roots, the, the four square app, and that's kind of the basis still of our business. We have a hundred million data points, which are actually places of interest across the world 200 countries. And we are we're in the business of understanding whereplace are and how people move through those places over time. And >>What's the value proposition for that data. You're selling the data. >>We are selling the data and we're selling it. You can think about use cases. Like how can I improve the engagement with my app through location data? So for example, next door, as a customer of ours, everyone knows next door. When a new business comes online, they wanna make sure that business is a real business. So they use our places to ensure that the address of that business is accurate. >>So how did you, how do you guys get your data? Because if you don't have the first party app, you probably had critical mass of data. Yeah. But then do other people use your data and then re contribute back in kinda like, well, Stripe is for financial. You guys are plugging in yeah. To >>Apps. A great question. So we still do have our consumer apps. We're still proud of those. It's still a basis of our company really. Okay. So, but we take that data. So our first party data, we also, for all the web, we have some partners integrate our SDK. And so we're pulling in all that data from various sources and then scrubbing it and making sure we have the most unique. >>So you guys still have a business where the app's working. Yep. Okay. But also let's just say, I wanna have a cube app. Yeah. And I want to do a check in button. Yep. So rather than build checking in, could I OEM you could four square is that you >>Could, and we could help you understand where people are checking in. So we know someone's here at the Hilton and Bellevue, we know exactly where that place is. You building the Cub app. You could say, I'm gonna check in here and we are verified. We know that that's the >>Right place. So that's a good for developer if they're building an app. >>Absolutely. So we have an SDK that any developer can integrate. >>Great. Okay. So what's the relationship with the marketplace? Take us through how Foursquare works with AWS marketplace. >>Sure. So we are primarily integrated with ADX, which is sort of a piece of marketplace it's for data specifically, we have both of our main products, which are places that POI database and visits, which is how people move through those places over time. So we're able to say these are the top chains in the country. Here's how people move throughout those. And both those products are listed on ADX. >>So if I'm in Palo Alto and I go to Joe in the juice yeah. You know that I kind of hang in one spot or is it privacy there? I mean, how do you know like what goes on? Well, >>We know somebody does that. We don't >>Know that you do that. So >>We ensure, you know, we're very privacy centric and privacy focused. We're not gonna, we don't tell anybody at you >>Yourself it's pattern data. It is. >>Okay. So it's normalized data, right? Over time groups of people, >>How they, how are people using the data to improve processes, user experience? What are some of the use cases? >>So that example, nextdoor, that's really a use case that we see a lot and that's improving their application. So that nextdoor app to ensure that the ACC, the data's accurate and that as you, as a user, you know, that that business is real. Cuz it's verified by four wear. Another one is you can use our data to make business decisions around where you're gonna place your next loca. You know, your next QSR. So young brands is a customer of ours. Those are, those guys are pizza hut KFC. They work with us to figure out where they should put their next KFC. Yeah. >>I mean retail location, location, location. Yeah. >>Right. Yeah. People are still, even though e-commerce right. People still go into stores >>And still are. Yeah. There's, there's, there's probably lot, a lot of math involved in knowing demographics patterns. Volume. >>Yeah. Some of our key customers are really data scientists. Like the think about cus with businesses that have true data science companies. They're really looking at that. >>Yeah. I mean in, and out's on the exit for a reason. Right. They want in and out. Yeah. So they wanna put it inland. >>Right. And we can actually tell you where that customer from in and out where they go next. Right. So then, you know, oh, they go to this park or they go somewhere and we can help you place your next in and out based on that visitation. >>Yeah. And so it's real science involved. So take us through the customers. You said data scientists, >>Mostly data scientists is kind of a key customer data science at a large corporation, like a QSR that's >>Somebody. Okay. So how is the procurement process on the marketplace? What does the buyer get? >>So what we see the real value is, is because they're already a customer of Amazon. That procurement is really easy, right? All the fulfillment goes through Amazon, through ADX. And what you're buying is either at API. So you can, that API can make real time calls or you're buying a flat file, like an actual database of those hundred points of interest. >>And then they integrate into their tool set. Right. They can do it. So it's pretty data friendly in terms of format. >>You can kind of do whatever you want with it. We're gonna give you that as long as you're smart enough to figure out what to do. Do we have a >>Lot of, so what's your experience with AWS marketplace? I mean, obviously we, we see a lot of changes. They had a reorg partner network merging with marketplace. You've been more on the data exchange, Chris kind of called that out. It's yeah. It's kind of a new thing. And, and he was hinting at a lot of confusion, but simplifying things. Yeah. What's your take of the current AWS marketplace >>Religions? I actually think ADX because our experience has primarily been ADX. I think they've done a really good job. They've really focused on the data and they understand how CU, how, you know, people like us sell our data. It hasn't been super confusing. We've had a lot of support. I think that's what Amazon gives you. You have to put a lot of effort into it, but they're also, they also give you a lot of support. >>Yeah. And, and I think data exchange is pretty significant to the strategic. It is >>Mission. It is. We feel that. Yeah. You know, we feel like they really value us as a partner. >>What's the big thing you're seeing out there right now in data, because like you're seeing a lot more data exchanges going on. There's always been data exchange, but you're seeing a lot more exchanges between companies. So let's just take partners. You're seeing a lot more people handle front end of a, a supply chain and you got more data exchanges. What's the future of data exchanges. If you had to kind of, you know, guess given your history in, in the industry. Yeah. What's the next around the corner trend? >>I think. Well, I think there's a, has to be consolidation. I know everyone's building one, but there's probably too many. I know from our experience, we can't support all of them. We're not a huge company. We can't support Amazon and X and Y and Z. Like it's just too many. So we kind of put all of our eggs in a couple baskets. So I think there'll be consolidation. I think there has to be just some innovation on what data products are, you know, for us, we have these two, it's an API and a flat file. I think as exchanges think about, you know, expanding what are the other types of data products that can help us build? >>Yeah. I mean, one of the things that's, you know, we see, we cover a lot of on the cube is edge. You know, you got, yeah. Amazon putting out new products in regions, you got new wavelength out there, you got regions, you got city level connectivity, data coming from cars. So a lot more IOT data. How do you guys see that folding into your vision of data acquisition and data usage, leverage, reuse, durability. These >>Are, yeah. I mean, we're, we are keeping an eye on all of that. You know, I think we haven't quite figured out how we wanna allocate resources against it, but you know, it's definitely, it's a really interesting space to be in. Like, I don't think data's going anywhere and I think it's really just gonna grow and how people use it's >>Gonna expand. Okay. So if I'm a customer, I go to the marketplace, I wanna buy four square data. What's the pitch. >>We can help you improve your business decisions or your applications through location data. We know where places are and how people move through the world over time. So we can tell you we're, we're sure that this is the Hilton in Bellevue. We know that, that we know how many people are moving through here and that's really the pitch. >>And they use that for whatever their needs are, business improvement, user experience. Yeah. >>Those are really the primary. I mean, we also have some financial use cases. So hedge funds, maybe they're thinking about yeah. How they wanna invest their money. They're gonna look at visits over time to understand what people are doing. Right. The pandemic made that super important. >>Yeah. That's awesome. Well, this is great. Great success story. Congratulations. And thanks for sharing on the cube. Really appreciate you coming on. Thank you. My final question is more about kind of the future. I wanna get your thoughts because your season pro, when you have the confluence of physical and digital coming together. Yeah. You know, I was just talking with a friend about FedEx's earnings, comparing that to say, AWS has a fleet of delivery too. Right? Amazon, Amazon nots. So, but physical world only products location matters. But then what about the person when they're walking around the real world? What happens when they get to the metaverses or, you know, they get to digital, they tend an event. Yeah. How do you see that crossroad? Cuz you have foot in both camps. We do, you got the app and you got the physical world it's gonna come together. Is there thoughts around, you can take your course care hat off and put your industry hat on. Yeah. You wanna answer that? Not officially on behalf of Foursquare, but I'm just curious, this is a, this is the confluence of like the blending of physical and digital. >>Yeah. I know. Wow. I admittedly haven't thought a whole lot about that. I think it would be really weird if I could track myself over time and the metaverse I mean, I think, yeah, as you said, it's >>It's, by the way, I'm not Bo on the metaverse when it's blocked diagrams, when you have gaming platforms that are like the best visual experience possible, right? >>Yeah. I mean, I think it, I think we'll see, I don't, I don't know that I have a >>Prediction, well hybrid we've seeing a lot of hybrid events. Like this event is still intimate VIP, but next year I guarantee it's gonna be larger, much larger and it's gonna be physical and face to face, but, but digital right as well. Yeah. Not people experiencing the, both that first party, physical, digital hybrid. Yeah. And it's interesting something that we track a lot >>Of. Yeah, for sure. Yeah. I think we'll have a, well, I think we'll, there's something there for us. I think that those there's a play there as we watch kind >>Of things change. All right, Leah, thank you for coming on the Q appreciate so much it all right. With four Graham, John fur a year checking in with four square here on the cube here at the Amazon web services marketplace seller conference. Second year back from the pandemic in person, more coverage after this break.

Published Date : Sep 21 2022

SUMMARY :

and the marketplace to sell through. Thanks for having me here. So four square, everyone, and that has internet history knows you. So we are part of the data exchange. What's the value proposition for that data. I improve the engagement with my app through location data? So how did you, how do you guys get your data? So our first party data, we also, for all the web, So you guys still have a business where the app's working. Could, and we could help you understand where people are checking in. So that's a good for developer if they're building an app. So we have an SDK that any developer can integrate. Take us through how Foursquare works with AWS So we're able to say these are I mean, how do you know like what goes on? We know somebody does that. Know that you do that. we don't tell anybody at you It is. So that example, nextdoor, that's really a use case that we see a lot and that's improving I mean retail location, location, location. People still go into stores And still are. Like the think about cus with businesses that have true So they wanna put it inland. So then, you know, oh, they go to this park or they go somewhere and we can help you place your next in and out based on that visitation. So take us through the customers. What does the buyer get? So you can, that API can make real time calls or you're buying a flat file, So it's pretty data friendly in terms of You can kind of do whatever you want with it. You've been more on the data exchange, Chris kind of called that out. They've really focused on the data and they understand how CU, how, you know, people like us sell It is You know, we feel like they really value us as a partner. If you had to kind of, you know, guess given your history in, I think as exchanges think about, you know, expanding what are the other types of data products You know, you got, yeah. we wanna allocate resources against it, but you know, it's definitely, it's a really interesting space to be in. What's the pitch. So we can tell you we're, And they use that for whatever their needs are, business improvement, user I mean, we also have some financial use cases. We do, you got the app and you got the physical world it's mean, I think, yeah, as you said, it's that we track a lot I think that those there's a play there as All right, Leah, thank you for coming on the Q appreciate so much it all right.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

APOORGANIZATION

0.99+

AISTORGANIZATION

0.99+

ChrisPERSON

0.99+

LeahPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

FedExORGANIZATION

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

BellevueLOCATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

FoursquareORGANIZATION

0.99+

200 countriesQUANTITY

0.99+

KFCORGANIZATION

0.99+

both campsQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

a year and a halfQUANTITY

0.99+

Lea PurcellPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.98+

second yearQUANTITY

0.98+

one organizationQUANTITY

0.97+

four squareORGANIZATION

0.97+

firstQUANTITY

0.97+

one spotQUANTITY

0.96+

hundred pointsQUANTITY

0.96+

pandemicEVENT

0.96+

fourQUANTITY

0.95+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.95+

Seattle, WashingtonLOCATION

0.95+

UberORGANIZATION

0.94+

a yearQUANTITY

0.94+

oneQUANTITY

0.93+

HiltonORGANIZATION

0.93+

hundred million data pointsQUANTITY

0.92+

Second year backDATE

0.89+

GrahamPERSON

0.87+

AWS Marketplace Seller ConferenceEVENT

0.86+

four squareTITLE

0.86+

first partyQUANTITY

0.85+

web services marketplace sellerEVENT

0.83+

John furPERSON

0.83+

ADXORGANIZATION

0.79+

XORGANIZATION

0.78+

COVIDORGANIZATION

0.77+

ADXTITLE

0.74+

couple basketsQUANTITY

0.74+

JoePERSON

0.73+

four squareQUANTITY

0.69+

CubTITLE

0.58+

2022DATE

0.56+

pizzaORGANIZATION

0.53+

Shreyans Mehta, Cequence Security | AWS re:Inforce 2022


 

(gentle upbeat music) >> Okay, welcome back everyone to theCUBE's live coverage here in Boston, Massachusetts for AWS RE:INFORCE 22. I'm John Furrier, your host with Dave Vellante co-host of theCUBE, and Shreyans Metah, CTO and founder of Cequence Security. CUBE alumni, great to see you. Thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Yeah. Thanks for having me here. >> So when we chatted you were part of the startup showcase. You guys are doing great. Congratulations on your business success. I mean, you guys got a good product in hot market. >> Yeah. >> You're here before we get into it. I want to get your perspective on the keynote and the talk tracks here and the show. But for the folks that don't know you guys, explain what you guys, take a minute to explain what you guys do and, and key product. >> Yeah, so we are the unified API protection place, but I mean a lot of people don't know what unified API protection is but before I get into that, just just talking about Cequence, we've been around since 2014. But we are protecting close to 6 billion API transactions every day. We are protecting close to 2 billion customer accounts, more than 2 trillion dollars in customer assets and a hundred million plus sort of, data points that we look at across customer base. That's that's who we are. >> I mean, of course we all know APIs is, is the basis of cloud computing and you got successful companies like Stripe, for instance, you know, you put API and you got a financial gateway, billions of transactions. What's the learnings. And now we're in a mode now where single point of failure is a problem. You got more automation you got more reasoning coming a lot more computer science next gen ML, AI there too. More connections, no perimeter. Right? More and more use cases, more in the cloud. >> Yeah. So what, what we are seeing today is, I mean from six years ago to now, when we started, right? Like the monolith apps are breaking down into microservices, right? What effectively, what that means is like every of the every such microservices talking APIs, right? So what used to be a few million web applications have now become billions of APIs that are communicating with each other. I mean, if you look at the, I mean, you spoke about IOT earlier, I call, I call like a Tesla is an application on four wheels that is communicating to its cloud over APIs. So everything is API yesterday. 80% traffic on internet is APIs. >> Now that's dated transit right there. (laughing) Couldn't resist. >> Yeah. >> Fully encrypted too. >> Yeah. >> Yeah, well hopefully. >> Maybe, maybe, maybe. (laughing) We dunno yet, but seriously everything is talking to an API. >> Yeah. >> Every application. >> Yeah. And, and there is no single choke point, right? Like you spoke about it. Like everybody is hosting their application in the cloud environments of their choice, AWS being one of them. But it's not the only one. Right? The, the, your APIs are hosted behind a CDN. Your APIs are hosted on behind an API gateway behind a load balancer in guest controllers. There is no single. >> So what's the problem? What's the problem now that you're solving? Because one was probably I can imagine connecting people, connecting the APIs. Now you've got more operational data. >> Yeah. >> Potential security hacks? More surface area? What's the what's what are you facing? >> Well, I can speak about some of the, our, some of the well known sort of exploits that have been well published, right. Everybody gets exploited, but I mean some of the well knowns. Now, if you, if you heard about Expedian last year there was a third party API that was exposing your your credit scores without proper authentication. Like Facebook had Ebola vulnerability sometime ago, where people could actually edit somebody else's videos online. Peloton again, a well known one. So like everybody is exposed, right. But that is the, the end results. All right? But it all starts with people don't even know where their APIs are and then you have to secure it all the way. So, I mean, ultimately APIs are prone to business logic attacks, fraud, and that's what, what you need to go ahead and protect. >> So is that the first question is, okay, what APIs do I need to protect? I got to take a API portfolio inventory. Is that? >> Yeah, so I think starting point is where. Where are my APIs? Right, so we spoke about there's no single choke point. Right, so APIs could be in, in your cloud environment APIs could be behind your cloud front, like we have here at RE:INFORCE today. So APIs could be behind your AKS, Ingrid controllers API gateways. And it's not limited to AWS alone, right. So, so knowing the unknown is, is the number one problem. >> So how do I find him? I asked Fred, Hey, where are our API? No, you must have some automated tooling to help me. >> Yeah, so, I, Cequence provides an option without any integration, what we call it, the API spider. Whereas like we give you visibility into your entire API attack surface without any integration into any of these services. Where are your APIs? What's your API attack surface about? And then sort of more details around that as well. But that is the number one. Is that agent list or is that an agent? >> There's no agent. So that means you can just sign up on our portal and then, then, then fire it away. And within a few minutes to an hour, we'll give you complete visibility into where your API is. >> So is it a full audit or is it more of a discovery? >> Or both? >> So, so number one, it's it's discovery, but we are also uncovering some of the potential vulnerabilities through zero knowledge. Right? So. (laughing) So, we've seen a ton of lock for J exposed server still. Like recently, there was an article that lock four J is going to be endemic. That is going to be here. >> Long time. >> (laughs) For, for a very long time. >> Where's your mask on that one? That's the Covid of security. >> Yeah. Absolutely absolutely. So, you need to know where your assets are what are they exposing? So, so that is the first step effectively discovering your attack surface. Yeah. >> I'm sure it's a efficiency issue too, with developers. The, having the spider allows you to at least see what's connecting out there versus having a meeting and going through code reviews. >> Yeah. Right? Is that's another big part of it? >> So, it is actually the last step, but you have, you actually go through a journey. So, so effectively, once you're discovering your assets you actually need to catalog it. Right. So, so I know where they're hosted but what are developers actually rolling out? Right. So they are updating your, the API endpoints on a daily basis, if not hourly basis. They have the CACD pipelines. >> It's DevOps. (laughing) >> Welcome to DevOps. It's actually why we'll do it. >> Yeah, and people have actually in the past created manual ways to catalog their APIs. And that doesn't really work in this new world. >> Humans are terrible at manual catalogization. >> Exactly. So, cataloging is really the next step for them. >> So you have tools for that that automate that using math, presumably. >> Exactly. And then we can, we can integrate with all these different choke points that we spoke about. There's no single choke points. So in any cloud or any on-prem environment where we actually integrate and give you that catalog of your APIs, that becomes your second step really. >> Yeah. >> Okay, so. >> What's the third step? There's the third step and then compliance. >> Compliance is the next one. So basically catalog >> There's four steps. >> Actually, six. So I'll go. >> Discovery, catalog, then compliance. >> Yeah. Compliance is the next one. So compliance is all about, okay, I've cataloged them but what are they really exposing? Right. So there could be PII information. There could be credit card, information, health information. So, I will treat every API differently based on the information that they're actually exposing. >> So that gives you a risk assessment essentially. >> Exactly. So you can, you can then start looking into, okay. I might have a few thousand API endpoints, like, where do I prioritize? So based on the risk exposure associated with it then I can start my journey of protecting so. >> That that's the remediation that's fixing it. >> Okay. Keep going. So that's, what's four. >> Four. That was that one, fixing. >> Yeah. >> Four is the risk assessment? >> So number four is detecting abuse. >> Okay. >> So now that I know my APIs and each API is exposing different business logic. So based on the business you are in, you might have login endpoints, you might have new account creation endpoint. You might have things around shopping, right? So pricing information, all exposed through APIs. So every business has a business logic that they end up exposing. And then the bad guys are abusing them. In terms of scraping pricing information it could be competitors scraping pricing. They will, we are doing account take. So detecting abuse is the first step, right? The fifth one is about preventing that because just getting visibility into abuse is not enough. I should be able to, to detect and prevent, natively on the platform. Because if you send signals to third party platforms like your labs, it's already too late and it's too course grain to be able to act on it. And the last step is around what you actually spoke about developers, right? Like, can I shift security towards the left, but it's not about shifting left. Just about shifting left. You obviously you want to bring in security to your CICD pipelines, to your developers, so that you have a full spectrum of API securities. >> Sure enough. Dave and I were talking earlier about like how cloud operations needs to look the same. >> Yeah. >> On cloud premise and edge. >> Yes. Absolutely. >> Edge is a wild card. Cause it's growing really fast. It's changing. How do you do that? Cuz this APIs will be everywhere. >> Yeah. >> How are you guys going to reign that in? What's the customers journey with you as they need to architect, not just deploy but how do you engage with the customer who says, "I have my environment. I'm not going to be to have somebody on premise and edge. I'll use some other clouds too. But I got to have an operating environment." >> Yeah. "That's pure cloud." >> So, we need, like you said, right, we live in a heterogeneous environment, right? Like effectively you have different, you have your edge in your CDN, your API gateways. So you need a unified view because every gateway will have a different protection place and you can't deal with 5 or 15 different tools across your various different environments. So you, what we provide is a unified view, number one and the unified way to protect those applications. So think of it like you have a data plane that is sprinkled around wherever your edges and gateways and risk controllers are and you have a central brains to actually manage it, in one place in a unified way. >> I have a computer science or computer architecture question for you guys. So Steven Schmidt again said single controls or binary states will fail. Obviously he's talking from a security standpoint but I remember the days where you wanted a single point of control for recovery, you talked about microservices. So what's the philosophy today from a recovery standpoint not necessarily security, but recovery like something goes wrong? >> Yeah. >> If I don't have a single point of control, how do I ensure consistency? So do I, do I recover at the microservice level? What's the philosophy today? >> Yeah. So the philosophy really is, and it's very much driven by your developers and how you want to roll out applications. So number one is applications will be more rapidly developed and rolled out than in the past. What that means is you have to empower your developers to use any cloud and serverless environments of their choice and it will be distributed. So there's not going to be a single choke point. What you want is an ability to integrate into that life cycle and centrally manage that. So there's not going to be a single choke point but there is going to be a single control plane to manage them off, right. >> Okay. >> So you want that unified, unified visibility and protection in place to be able to protect these. >> So there's your single point of control? What about the company? You're in series C you've raised, I think, over a hundred million dollars, right? So are you, where are you at? Are you scaling now? Are you hiring sales people or you still trying to sort of be careful about that? Can you help us understand where you're at? >> Yeah. So we are absolutely scaling. So, we've built a product that is getting, that is deployed already in all these different verticals like ranging from finance, to detail, to social, to telecom. Anybody who has exposure to the outside world, right. So product that can scale up to those demands, right? I mean, it's not easy to scale up to 6 billion requests a day. So we've built a solid platform. We've rolled out new products to complete the vision. In terms of the API spider, I spoke about earlier. >> The unified, >> The unified API protection covers three aspects or all aspects of API life cycle. We are scaling our teams from go to market motion. We brought in recently our chief marketing officer our chief revenue officer as well. >> So putting all the new, the new pieces in place. >> Yeah. >> So you guys are like API observability on steroids. In a way, right? >> Yeah, absolutely. >> Cause you're doing the observability. >> Yes. >> You're getting the data analysis for risk. You're having opportunities and recommendations around how to manage the stealthy attacks. >> From a full protection perspective. >> You're the API store. >> Yeah. >> So you guys are what we call best of breed. This is a trend we're seeing, pick something that you're best in breed in. >> Absolutely. >> And nail it. So you're not like an observability platform for everything. >> No. >> You guys pick the focus. >> Specifically, APS. And, so basically your, you can have your existing tools in place. You will have your CDN, you will have your graphs in place. So, but for API protection, you need something specialized and that stuff. >> Explain why I can't just rely on CDN infrastructure, for this. >> So, CDNs are, are good for content delivery. They do your basic TLS, and things like that. But APIs are all about your applications and business that you're exposing. >> Okay, so you, >> You have no context around that. >> So, yeah, cause this is, this is a super cloud vision that we're seeing of structural change in the industry, a new thing that's happening in real time. Companies like yours are be keeping a focus and nailing it. And now the customer's can assemble these services and company. >> Yeah. - Capabilities, that's happening. And it's happening like right now, structural change has happened. That's called the cloud. >> Yes. >> Cloud scale. Now this new change, best of brief, what are the gaps? Because I'm a customer. I got you for APIs, done. You take the complexity away at scale. I trust you. Where are the other gaps in my architecture? What's new? Cause I want to run cloud operations across all environments and across clouds when appropriate. >> Yeah. >> So I need to have a full op where are the other gaps? Where are the other best of breed components that need to be developed? >> So it's about layered, the layers that you built. Right? So, what's the thing is you're bringing in different cloud environments. That is your infrastructure, right? You, you, you either rely on the cloud provider for your security around that for roll outs and operations. Right? So then is going to be the next layer, which is about, is it serverless? Is it Kubernetes? What about it? So you'll think about like a service mesh type environment. Ultimately it's all about applications, right? That's, then you're going to roll out those applications. And that's where we actually come in. Wherever you're rolling out your applications. We come in baked into that environment, and for giving you that visibility and control, protection around that. >> Wow, great. First of all, APIs is the, is what cloud is based on. So can't go wrong there. It's not a, not a headwind for you guys. >> Absolutely. >> Great. What's a give a quick plug for the company. What are you guys looking to do hire? Get customers who's uh, when, what, what's the pitch? >> So like I started earlier, Cequence is around unified API protection, protecting around the full life cycle of your APIs, ranging from discovery all the way to, to testing. So, helping you throughout the, the life cycle of APIs, wherever those APIs are in any cloud environment. On-prem or in the cloud in your serverless environments. That's what Cequence is about. >> And you're doing billions of transactions. >> We're doing 6 billion requests every day. (laughing) >> Which is uh, which is, >> A lot. >> Unheard for a lot of companies here on the floor today. >> Sure is. Thanks for coming on theCUBE, sure appreciate it. >> Yeah. >> Good, congratulations to your success. >> Thank you. >> Cequence Security here on theCUBE at RE:INFORCE. I'm chatting with Dave Vellante, more coverage after this short break. (upbeat, gentle music)

Published Date : Jul 26 2022

SUMMARY :

I'm John Furrier, your host So when we chatted you were and the talk tracks here and the show. We are protecting close to and you got a financial gateway, means is like every of the Now that's dated transit right there. everything is talking to an API. But it's not the only one. What's the problem now and then you have to So is that the first question is, okay, So APIs could be behind your AKS, No, you must have some But that is the number one. So that means you can that lock four J is going to be endemic. That's the Covid of security. So, so that is the first step effectively The, having the spider allows you to Yeah. So, it is actually the It's DevOps. Welcome to DevOps. actually in the past Humans are terrible the next step for them. So you have tools for that and give you that catalog What's the third step? Compliance is the next one. So I'll go. Compliance is the next one. So that gives you a risk So based on the risk That that's the So that's, what's four. That was that one, fixing. So based on the business you are in, needs to look the same. How do you do that? What's the customers journey with you Yeah. So you need a unified view but I remember the days where What that means is you have So you want that So product that can scale from go to market motion. So putting all the new, So you guys are like API You're getting the So you guys are what So you're not like an observability you can have your existing tools in place. for this. and business that you're exposing. And now the customer's can assemble these That's called the cloud. I got you for APIs, done. the layers that you built. It's not a, not a headwind for you guys. What are you guys looking to do hire? So, helping you throughout And you're doing (laughing) here on the floor today. Thanks for coming on on theCUBE at RE:INFORCE.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

FredPERSON

0.99+

Steven SchmidtPERSON

0.99+

5QUANTITY

0.99+

Shreyans MetahPERSON

0.99+

third stepQUANTITY

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Cequence SecurityORGANIZATION

0.99+

second stepQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

Shreyans MehtaPERSON

0.99+

first questionQUANTITY

0.99+

more than 2 trillion dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

2014DATE

0.99+

four stepsQUANTITY

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

first stepQUANTITY

0.99+

Boston, MassachusettsLOCATION

0.99+

15 different toolsQUANTITY

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

RE:INFORCEORGANIZATION

0.99+

6 billion requestsQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

six years agoDATE

0.98+

billionsQUANTITY

0.98+

single choke pointQUANTITY

0.98+

CUBEORGANIZATION

0.98+

single pointQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

three aspectsQUANTITY

0.97+

TeslaORGANIZATION

0.97+

over a hundred million dollarsQUANTITY

0.97+

AKSORGANIZATION

0.97+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.97+

one placeQUANTITY

0.96+

yesterdayDATE

0.96+

each APIQUANTITY

0.96+

singleQUANTITY

0.96+

FourQUANTITY

0.96+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.95+

CTOPERSON

0.95+

an hourQUANTITY

0.94+

FirstQUANTITY

0.93+

80% trafficQUANTITY

0.91+

series COTHER

0.9+

fifth oneQUANTITY

0.9+

up to 6 billion requests a dayQUANTITY

0.89+

single choke pointsQUANTITY

0.88+

million web applicationsQUANTITY

0.86+

6 billion API transactionsQUANTITY

0.83+

fourQUANTITY

0.83+

single control planeQUANTITY

0.83+

close to 2 billion customer accountsQUANTITY

0.83+

IngridPERSON

0.81+

PelotonLOCATION

0.78+

DevOpsTITLE

0.74+

re:Inforce 2022TITLE

0.73+

APIsQUANTITY

0.72+

transactionsQUANTITY

0.71+

single controlsQUANTITY

0.71+

22TITLE

0.68+

a hundred millionQUANTITY

0.68+

ExpedianORGANIZATION

0.68+

IOTTITLE

0.67+

EbolaOTHER

0.62+

KubernetesTITLE

0.61+

CequenceORGANIZATION

0.59+

zeroQUANTITY

0.59+

minutesQUANTITY

0.53+

Anshu Sharma | AWS Summit New York 2022


 

(upbeat music) >> Man: We're good. >> Hey everyone. Welcome back to theCube's live coverage of AWS Summit NYC. We're in New York City, been here all day. Lisa Martin, John Furrier, talking with AWS partners ecosystem folks, customers, AWS folks, you name it. Next up, one of our alumni, rejoins us. Please welcome Anshu Sharma the co-founder and CEO of Skyflow. Anshu great to have you back on theCube. >> Likewise, I'm excited to be back. >> So I love how you guys founded this company. Your inspiration was the zero trust data privacy vault pioneered by two of our favorites, Apple and Netflix. You started with a simple question. What if privacy had an API? So you built a data privacy vault delivered as an API. Talk to us, and it's only in the last three and a half years. Talk to us about a data privacy vault and what's so unique about it. >> Sure. I think if you think about all the key challenges we are seeing in our personal lives when we are dealing with technology companies a lot of anxiety is around what happens to my data, right? If you want to go to a pharmacy they want to know not just your health ID number but they want to know your social security number your credit card number, your phone number and all of that information is actually useful because they need to be able to engage with you. And it's true for hospitals, health systems. It's true for your bank. It's true for pretty much anybody you do business with even an event like this. But then question that keeps coming up is where does this data go? And how is it protected? And the state of the art here has always been to keep kind of, keep it protected when it's in storage but almost all the breaches, all the hacks happen not because you've steal somebody's disc, but because someone enters through an API or a portal. So the question we asked was we've been building different shapes of containers for different types of data. You don't store your logs in a data warehouse. You don't store your analytical data in a regular RDBMS. Similarly, you don't store your passwords and usernames you store them in identity systems. So if PI is so special why isn't it a container that's used for storing PII? So that's how the idea of Pii.World came up. >> So you guys just got a recent funding, a series B financing which means for the folks out there that don't know the inside baseball, must people do, means you're doing well. It's hard to get that round of funding means you're up and growing to the right. What's the differentiator? Why are you guys so successful? Why the investment growth, what's the momentum driver? >> So I think in some ways we took one of the most complex problems, data privacy, like half the people can't even describe like, does data privacy mean like I have to be GDPR compliant or does it actually mean I'm protecting the data? So you have multiple stakeholders in any company. If you're a pharma company, you may have a chief privacy officer, a data officer, this officer, that officer, and all of these people were talking and the answer was buy more tools. So if you look around behind our back, there's probably dozens of companies out there. One protecting data in an API call another protecting data in a database, another one data warehouse. But as a CEO, CTO, I want to know what happens to my social security number from a customer end to end. So we said, if you can radically simplify the whole thing and the key insight was you can simplify it by actually isolating and protecting this data. And this architecture evolved on its own at companies like Apple and other places, but it takes dozens of engineers for those companies to build it out. So we like, well, the pattern will makes sense. It logically kind is just common sense. So instead of selling dozens of tools, we can just give you a very simple product, which is like one API call, you know, protect this data... >> So like Stripe is for a plugin for a financial transaction you plug it into the app, similar dynamic here, right? >> Exactly. So it's Stripe for payments, Twilio for Telephony. We have API for everything, but if you have social security numbers or pan numbers you still are like relying on DIY. So I think what differentiated us and attracted the investors was, if this works, >> It's huge. every company needs it. >> Well, that's the integration has become the key thing. I got to ask you because you mentioned GDPR and all the complexities around the laws and the different regulations. That could be a real blocker in a wet blanket for innovation. >> Anshu: Yes. >> And with the market we're seeing here at, at your Summit New York, small event. 10,000 people, more people here than were at Snowflake Summit as an example. And they're the hottest company in data. So this small little New York event is proven that that world is growing. So why should this wet blanket, these rules slow it down? How do you balance it? 'Cause that's a concern. If you checking all the boxes you're never actually building anything. >> So, you know, we just ran into a couple of customers who still are struggling with moving from the data center to AWS Cloud. Now the fact that here means they want to but something is holding them back. I also met the AI team of Amazon. They're doing some amazing work and they're like, the biggest hindrance for them is making customers feel safe when they do the machine learning. Because now you're opening up the data sets to more people. And in all of those cases your innovation basically stops because CSO is like, look you can't put PII in the cloud unprotected. And with the vault architecture we call it privacy by architecture. So there's a term called privacy by design. I'm like what the, is privacy by design, right? >> John: It's an architecture. (John laughing) >> But if you are an architecture and a developer like me I was like, I know what architecture is. I don't know what privacy by design is. >> So you guys are basically have that architecture by design which means foundational based services. So you're providing that as a service. So other people don't have to build the complex. >> Anshu: Exactly. >> You know that you will be Apple's backend team to build that privacy with you you get all that benefit. >> Exactly. And traditionally, people have had to make compromises. If you encrypt the data and secure it, then you can't use it. Using a proprietary polymorphic encryption technology you can actually have your cake and eat it to. So what that means for customers is, if you want to protect data in Snowflake or REDshare, use Skyflow with it. We have integrations to databases, to data lakes, all the common workflow tools. >> Can you give us a customer example that you think really articulates the value of what Skyflow is delivering? >> Well, I'll give you two examples. One in the FinTech space, one in the health space. So in the FinTech space this is a company called Nomi Health. They're a large payments processor for the health insurance market. And funnily enough, their CTO actually came from Goldman Sachs. He actually built apple card. (John laughing) Right? That if we all have in our phones. And he saw our product and he's like, for my new company, I'm going to just use you guys because I don't want to go hire 20 engineers. So for them, we had a HIPAA compliant environment a PCI compliant environment, SOC 2 compliant environment. And he can sleep better at night because he doesn't have to worry what is my engineer in Poland or Ukraine doing right now? I have a vault. I have rules set up. I can audit it. Everything is logged. Similarly for Science 37, they run clinical trials globally. They wanted to solve data residency. So for them the problem was, how do I run one common global instance? When the rules say you have to break everything up and that's very expensive. >> And so I love this. I'm a customer. For them a customer. I love it. You had me at hello, API integration. I love it. How much does it cost? What's it going to cost me? How do I need to think about my operationalizing? 'Cause I know with an API, I can do that. Am I paying by the usage, by the drink? How do I figure out? >> So we have programs for startups where it's really really inexpensive. We get them credits. And then for enterprises, we basically have a platform fee. And then based on the amount of data PII, we charge them. We don't nickel and dime the customers. We don't like the usage based model because, you don't know how many times you're going to hit an API. So we usually just based on the number of customer records that you have and you can hit them as many time as you want. There's no API limits. >> So unlimited record based. >> Exactly. that's your variable. >> Exactly. We think about you buying odd zero, for example, for authentication you pay them by the number of active users you have. So something similar. >> So you run on AWS, but you just announced a couple of new GTM partners, MuleSoft and plan. Can you talk to us about, start with MuleSoft? What are you doing and why? And the same with VLA? >> Sure. I mean, MuleSoft was very interesting customers who were adopting our products at, you know, we are buying this product for our new applications but what about our legacy code? We can't go in there and add APIs there. So the simplest way to do integration in the legacy world is to use an integration broker. So that's where MuleSoft integration came out and we announced that. It's a logical place for you to swap out real social security numbers with, you know, fake ones. And then we also announced a partnership with SnowFlake, same thing. I think every workload as it's moving to the cloud needs some kind of data protection with it. So I think going forward we are going to be announcing even more partnerships. So you can imagine all the places you're storing PII today whether it's in a call center solution or analytics solution, there's a PII story there. >> Talk about the integration aspect because I love the momentum. I get everything makes secure the customers all these environments, integrations are super important to plug into. And then how do I essentially operate you on my side? Do I import the records? How do you connect to my environment in my databases? >> So it's really, really easy when you encrypt the data and use Skyflow wall, we create what is called a format preserving token, which is essentially replacing a social security number with something that looks like an SSN but it's not. So that there's no schema changes involved. You just have to do that one time swap over and then in terms of integrations, most of these integrations are prebuilt. So Snowflake integration is prebuilt. MuleSoft integration is prebuilt. We're going to announce some new ones. So the goal is for off the table in platforms like Snowflake and MuleSoft, we prebuilt all the integrations. You can build your own. It takes about like a day. And then in terms of data import basically it's the same standard process that you would use with any other data store. >> Got to ask you about data breaches. Obviously the numbers in 2021 were huge. We're seeing so much change in the cyber security landscape ransomware becoming a household word, a matter of when but not if... How does Skyflow help organizations protect themselves or reduce the number of breaches so that they are not the next headline? >> You know, the funny thing about breaches is again and again, we see people doing the same mistakes, right? So Equifax had a breach four years ago where a customer portal, you know, no customer support rep should have access to a 100 million people's data. Like is that customer agent really accessing 100 million? But because we've been using legacy security tools they either give you access or don't give you access. And that's not how it's going to work. Because if I'm going to engage with the pharmacy and airline they need to be able to use my data in multiple different places. So you need to have fine grain controls around it. So I think the reason we keep getting breaches is cybersecurity industry is selling, 10s of billions of dollars worth of tools in the name of security but they cannot be applied at a fine grain level enough. I can't say things like for my call center agent that's living in Phoenix, Arizona they can only verify last four digits, but the same call center worker in Philippines can't even see that. So how do you get all that granular control in place? Is really why we keep seeing data breaches. So the Equifax breach, the Shopify breach the Twitter breaches, they're all the same. Like again and again, it's either an inside person or an external person who's gotten in. And once you're in and this is the whole idea of zero trust as you know. Once you're in, you can access all the data. Zero trust means that you don't assume that you actually isolate PII separately. >> A lot of the cybersecurity issues as you were talking about, are people based. Somebody clicking on something or gaining access. And I always talk to security experts about how do you control for the people aspect besides training, awareness, education. Is Skyflow a facilitator of that in a way that we haven't seen before? >> Yeah. So I think what ends up happening is, people even after they have breaches, they will lock down the system that had the breach, but then they have the same data sitting in a partner database, maybe a customer database maybe a billing system. So by centralizing and isolating PII in one system you can then post roles based access control rules. You can put limitations around it. But if you try to do that across hundreds of DS bases, you're just not going to be able to do it because it's basically just literally impossible, so... >> My final question for you is on, for me is you're here at AWS Summits, 10,000 people like I said. More people here than some big events and we're just in New York city. Okay. You actually work with AWS. What's next for you guys as you got the fresh funding, you guys looking for more talent, what's your next mountain you're going to climb? Tell us what's next for the company. Share your vision, put a plug in for the company. >> Well, it's actually very simple. Today we actually announced that we have a new chief revenue officer who's joining us. Tammy, she's joined us from LaunchDarkly which is it grew from like, you know, single digits to like over nine digits in revenue. And the reason she's joining Skyflow is because she sees the same inflection point hitting us. And for us that means more marketing, more sales, more growth in more geographies and more partnerships. And we think there's never been a better time to solve privacy. Literally everything that we deal with even things like rove evade issues eventually ties back into a issue around privacy. >> Lisa: Yes. >> AWS gets the model API, you know, come on, right? That's their model. >> Exactly. So I think if you look at the largest best companies that have been built in the last 20 years they took something that should have been simple but was not. There used to be Avayas of the world, selling Telephony intel, Twilio came and said, look an API. And we are trying to do the same to the entire security compliance and privacy industry is to narrow the problem down and solve it once. >> (indistinct) have it. We're going to get theCube API. (Lisa laughing) That's what we're going to do. All right. >> Thank you so much. >> Awesome. Anshu, thank you for joining us, talking to us about what's new at Skyflow. It sounds like you got that big funding investment. Probably lots of strategic innovation about to happen. So you'll have to come back in a few months and maybe at next reinvent in six months and tell us what's new, what's going on. >> Last theCube interview was very well received. People really like the kind of questions you guys asked. So I love this show and I think... >> It's great when you're a star like you, you got good market, great team, smart. I mean, look at this. I mean, what slow down are we talking about here? >> Yeah. I don't see... >> There is no slow down on the enterprise. >> Privacy's hot and it's incredibly important and we're only going to be seeing more and more of it. >> You can talk to any CIO, CSO, CTO or the board and they will tell you there is no limit to the budget they have for solving the core privacy issues. We love that. >> John: So you want to move on to building? >> Lisa: Obviously that must make you smile. >> John: You solved a big problem. >> Thank you. >> Awesome. Anshu, thank you again. Congrats on the momentum and we'll see you next time and hear more on the evolution of Skyflow. Thank you for your time. >> Thank you. >> For John furrier, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCube live from New York City at AWS Summit NYC 22. We'll be right back with our next guest. So stick around. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Jul 14 2022

SUMMARY :

Anshu great to have you back on theCube. So I love how you guys So the question we asked was So you guys just got a recent funding, So we said, if you can radically but if you have social It's huge. I got to ask you because How do you balance it? the data sets to more people. (John laughing) But if you are an architecture So you guys are basically to build that privacy with you if you want to protect data When the rules say you Am I paying by the usage, by the drink? and you can hit them as that's your variable. of active users you have. So you run on AWS, So you can imagine all the How do you connect to my So the goal is for off the table Got to ask you about data breaches. So how do you get all that about how do you control But if you try to do that as you got the fresh funding, you know, single digits to like you know, come on, right? that have been built in the last 20 years We're going to get theCube API. It sounds like you got that of questions you guys asked. you got good market, great team, smart. down on the enterprise. and we're only going to be and they will tell you must make you smile. and we'll see you next time So stick around.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

PolandLOCATION

0.99+

UkraineLOCATION

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

TammyPERSON

0.99+

Anshu SharmaPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

PhilippinesLOCATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AnshuPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

New York CityLOCATION

0.99+

Goldman SachsORGANIZATION

0.99+

SnowFlakeORGANIZATION

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

100 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

MuleSoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

20 engineersQUANTITY

0.99+

Nomi HealthORGANIZATION

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

ShopifyORGANIZATION

0.99+

EquifaxORGANIZATION

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.99+

100 million peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

two examplesQUANTITY

0.99+

10,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

GDPRTITLE

0.99+

dozens of toolsQUANTITY

0.99+

SkyflowORGANIZATION

0.99+

SnowflakeTITLE

0.99+

HIPAATITLE

0.99+

Phoenix, ArizonaLOCATION

0.98+

four years agoDATE

0.98+

dozens of engineersQUANTITY

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

AWS SummitEVENT

0.98+

LaunchDarklyORGANIZATION

0.98+

SkyflowTITLE

0.97+

Snowflake SummitEVENT

0.97+

John furrierPERSON

0.97+

Zero trustQUANTITY

0.97+

SOC 2TITLE

0.96+

one systemQUANTITY

0.95+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.95+

hundredsQUANTITY

0.95+

TelephonyORGANIZATION

0.95+

Pii.WorldORGANIZATION

0.94+

six monthsQUANTITY

0.93+

AWS SummitsEVENT

0.93+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.93+

10s ofQUANTITY

0.93+

zero trustQUANTITY

0.92+

zeroQUANTITY

0.92+

dozens of companiesQUANTITY

0.91+

VLAORGANIZATION

0.91+

MuleSoftTITLE

0.88+

SummitEVENT

0.87+

one timeQUANTITY

0.87+

John Kim, Sendbird & Luiz Fernando Diniz, PicPay Social | AWS Startup Showcase S2 E3


 

>>Hello, everyone. Welcome to the cubes presentation of the 80 startup showcase marketing technology, emerging cloud scale customer experiences. This is season two, episode three of the ongoing series covering the exciting startups from the, a AWS ecosystem to talk about all the top trends and also featuring the key customers. I'm your host, John ER, today we're joined by Louis Fernando, Denise vice president of peak pay social and John Kim, the CEO of Sandberg to learn about the future of what's going on in fostering deeper customer relationships. Gentlemen, thanks for joining us in the cube showcase, >>Excited to be here. >>So John talk about Sendbird real quick set the table for us. What you guys do, you got a customer here to highlight some of the key things you're doing with customers, the value proposition what's Sendbird and what's the showcase about, >>Yeah, I'm really excited to be here. Uh, I'm John founder, C of Sandberg. So Sandberg is the worst leading conversations platform for mobile applications. We can power user to user conversations in mobile applications, as well as the brand to user conversations such as marketing sales and support. So, uh, today we power over quarter billion users on a monthly basis. Uh, we have, you know, through over 300 employees across seven different countries around the world, we work with some of the world's leading, uh, uh, customers such as big pay that we are going to showcase today, along with other, uh, wonderful customers like DoorDash, Reddit, <inaudible> sports and so forth. We have collectively raised over 200 million in funding. Um, so that's kind of where we are today. >>Well, it's always great to have, uh, one great success. Uh, good funding, more important is the customers. And I love showcases where the customers do the talking, because that means you've got some success stories. Louise, talk about, um, are you happy customer? What's it like working with Sandberg? Give us the, give us the scoop. >>So sandbar is being a great partner with us. So pick pay is a Brazilian payment app. We're at a FinTech here with more than 30 million active users using everyday pick pay to pay everything. So the, the, the majority of the payments are between peers, between people. So sandbar is, is helping us to improve a lot this journey to make it more pleasant between every everyone who are using big, big. So we are here, let's talk and it's a >>Pleasure. Yeah, it's awesome. Well, I great to have you guys on great, great relationship. And one of the things we've been talking about on the cube, if the folks watching that know our audience, no we've been banging the, the drum hard on this new world and this new patterns of user expectations and building relationships in this new digital world is not about the old way, the old MarTech way. There are new new use cases, new expectations by the consumers, John, that are, that are bringing up new opportunities, but also expectations. It's not about, I mean, I mean, if someone's using discord, for example, cuz they're gamers, they're done discord. If they want to communicate with, with slack, they, I do slack, SMS, kind of old hat. You got WhatsApp, you've got all these now peer to peer organic connections, multiple channels. This is all the new world. What's your vision on this new relationship building digital communication world. >>Yeah. So I, I think you brought a really good point there. One of the most frequently used applications in the world today are messaging applications across any countries, any region, any culture, if you look at the most frequently used and most longest used applications are usually some form of a, a messaging application. Now the end users or the customers in the world are so used to using, uh, uh, such a, you know, frictionless ver very responsive, modern experience on those messaging applications. What we want to help with the business around the world, the 99.9% of the business around the world don't have those really te knowledge or user experience expertise in messaging. So we want to help our businesses, help our customers be able to harness the power of modern messaging capabilities and then be able to embed it in their own business so that they can retain their users on their platform, engage with them in the con context that their, uh, what their business is about so that they can not only, uh, control or provide a better user experience, but also be able to, uh, understand their users better, uh, understand what they're doing on their businesses, be able to own and, uh, control the data in a more secure and safe way. >>So really it's uh, we're like the Robin hood of the world trying to keep superpower yeah. Back to the businesses. >>Yeah. Deal from the rich idea, the messaging scale. Bring that to everybody else. I love that. Uh, and you got kind of this double int Robin hood kind of new for the new generation finance. This is about taking the advantage of scalable platforms, monopolies, right. And giving the entrepreneur an opportunity to have that same capability feature, rich Louise PPE. You guys used Sendbird together. You have to level up, you gotta compete with those big monopolies to pride, scalable conversations. Okay. How did you engage this? What was your success path look? What was it look like? >>Yeah. When we look to this majority, the bigger chat apps that we have nowadays in the market, we are looking to them and then Brazilians are using for their daily course, but Brazilians are paying every day millions and millions of payments. And these chat apps are not, uh, able to, to, to deal with these payments. So what we are doing here is that, uh, providing a solution where every conversation that are going to happen before, during, or after a payment between the, the people, they would, uh, uh, have a nice platform that could afford all, all of their emotions and discussions that they have to do before or after the payment. So we are putting together the chat platform and we with the payment platform. So that's, that's what we are doing now. >>Okay. So just so I get this right. You're using Sandberg essentially integrated your mobile payment experience. Okay. Which is your app you're Sandberg to bring that scalability into the, into the social app application into the app itself. Is that right? >>Yes. Perfect. Integrated with the payment journey. So everybody who is going to pay, they need to find the one, the, the one they want to pay and then they can chat and conclude the payment through the platform. Yeah. I >>Mean, why not have it right there at point of, uh, transaction. Right. Um, why did you, um, decide to, um, to use conversations in your mobile wallet? Just curious. >>So it's important to say that we were born social. We born in 2012. So when our main main product was peer to peer payments, so everybody were sending money to a friend requesting or charging their family. So a service provider. And once we, we started as a social platform in that period. In that moment, we are just focusing in likes comments and like public interactions and the word become more private. And as soon we under understood this situation, we decided to move from a public feed to a private, to a private interaction. So that's, uh, that then the, the conversational space was the solution for that moving from a public interaction to a private interaction. So between the peers, which are involved in the, the transaction. So that's why we are providing the chat solution integrated with payments. >>That's a great call. John, just give some context here, again, for the folks watching this is now expected, this integrated experience. What's your, how would you talk to folks out there? I mean, first of all, I, I, I see it clearly, you've got an app, you gotta have all this integration and you need it scaling to reach features. Talk about your view on that. Is that the, is that what's happening here? What's, what's the real dynamic here. What's the, the big trend. >>Yeah. One thing that's, uh, super interesting about, uh, uh, like messaging experience in general, if you think about any kind of conversations that's happening, uh, digitally between human beings, more and more conversations, just like what Louis mentioned earlier are happening between in a private setting, even on applications, whether it be slack or other forms of communication, uh, more hap uh, more conversations happen through either one-on-one conversations or in a private small group settings. And because people feel more secure, uh, safe to have, uh, more intimate conversations. So even when you're making transactions is more, you know, there's a higher trust and, uh, people tend to engage, uh, far better on platforms through these kind of private conversations. That's where we kind of come in, whether it be, you want to set a one-on-one conversations or with a group conversation. And then ultimately if you want to take it public in a large group setting, you can also support, you know, thousands, if not, you know, hundreds of thousands of people, uh, engaging a public forum as well. So all of those capabilities can be implemented using something Ember, but again, the world is, uh, right now the businesses and how the user are, are interacting with this with each other is all happening through digital conversations. And we're seeing more and more of that happening, uh, throughout the life cycle of our company. >>Yeah, just as a sidebar, I was just talking to a venture in San Francisco the other day, and we're talking about the future of security and SAS and cloud scale. And, you know, the conversation went to more of, is it SAS? Is it platform as a service Louis? I wanna get your thoughts because, you know, you're seeing more and more needs for customization, low code, no code. You're seeing these trends. You gotta built in security. So, you know, the different, the old SAS model was softwares a service, but now that's everything in the cloud is softwares a service. So, but you need to have that platform kind of vibe for scale customization, maybe some developer integration, cuz apps are becoming the, the touchpoint. So can you walk us through what your vision was when you decided to integrate, chat into your app and how did you see that chat, changing the customer experience for payments and across your user journey? Cause, I mean, it's obvious now looking at it, but it might not have been for some. What was your, what was your vision? And when you had to do that, >>When you looked to Brazilian reality, we can see those in, uh, payment apps. All of them are focused on the transactional moment. And as soon as we started to think, how could be, how could our journey be better, more pleased than the others and make people want to be here and to use and to open our app every day is just about making the interaction with the peers easier, even with a merchant or even with my friend. So the main point that our first step was just to connect all, all the users between themselves to payments. The second step we are providing now is using the chat platform, the send bird platform as a platform for peak pay. So we are going to provide more best information. We're going to provide a better customer experience through the support and everything. So, um, this, this, this interaction or this connection, this partnership with Sandberg are going to unlock a new level of service for our users. And at the same time, a much more pleasant or a more pleasant journey for them while they are using the, the app for a, a simple payment, or if they are going to look for a group objective or maybe a crowdfund in the future or a group to decide, or just to pay something. So we are then locking a new level of interaction between the peers between the people and the users that are, that are involved into this, this payment or this simple transaction, we are making it more conversational. >>Yeah. You're making the application more valuable. We're gonna get to that in the next segment about, you know, the future of apps one and done, you see a lot of sports apps, oh, this big tournament, you know, and then you use it and then you never use it again until next year. You know, you have very time specific apps, but now you guys are smart to kind of build this in, but I gotta ask you a question because a lot of developers and companies out there always have this buy versus build decision. Why did you decide to use Sendbird versus building it in house? It's always kind of like the big trade off. >>Yeah. First of all, it will take a long, long time for us to achieve a major platform as Sandberg. And we are not a chat platform. So we are going to use this social interaction to improve the payment platform that we have. So when we look to the market and we found Sandberg, then we thought, okay, this guys, they are a real platform. And through the conversations, we are seeing that they are roadmap working in synergy with our roadmap. And then we can, we could start to deliver value to our, to our users in a fastest way. Could you imagine it spending 2, 3, 4 years to develop something like sand? And even when we achieve this point, probably our solution will be, would be weaker than, than Sandberg. So it was like no brainer to do that. Yeah. Because we want to improve the payment journey, not to do a chat, only a chat platform. So that's why we are working together to prove it's >>Really, you start to see these plugins, these, you know, look at Stripe for payments, for instance, right. And here in the success they've had, you know, people want to plug in for services. So John, I gotta ask you about, um, about the, the complexity that goes into it. The trust required that they have for you, you have to do this heavy lifting, you gotta provide the confidence that your service is gonna have to scale the compliance. Talk about that. What do you guys do under the covers that make this easy again, great business model, heavy lifting done by you. Seamless integration provide that value. That's why business is good, but there's a lot going on share what's happening under the, under the covers. >>Yeah. Um, before going to like the technical, like intricacy of what we do just to provide a little bit of background context on why we even started this business is we, uh, this is my second startup. My first company was a gaming company. We had built like chat three, four times just for our own game. So we were basically, we felt like we were reinventing the wheel. And then we actually went on a buyer's journey when we were building a social application, uh, uh, for, for, uh, uh, building our own community. We tried to actually be a buyer to see if we can actually find a solution. We want to use turns out that there weren't a lot of like sophisticated, you know, top notch, modern, uh, uh, chat experience that we can build using some other third party solutions. So we had to build all of that ourselves, which became the foundation for se today. >>And what we realized is that for most companies like using a building, the most sophisticated chat is probably not going to be their highest priority in case a pick pay will be, you know, financial transactions and all the other business that can be built on and hosted by platform like pick pay. But, you know, building the most topnotch chat experience would be a priority for a company like let's say WhatsApp or, or telegram, but it will probably not be the priority for, you know, major gaming companies, food delivery companies, finance companies, chat is not the highest priority. That's kind of where we come in, cuz chat is the highest priority for us. And we also have a privilege of working with some of the other, uh, world industry, uh, industry leaders. So by, uh, having this collective experience, working with the industry leaders, we get, uh, uh, technological superiority, being able to, uh, scale to, you know, hundreds of millions of users on a monthly basis. Also the security and the compliances by working with some of the largest commercial banks on some of the largest FinTech applications across the globe. So we have, you know, security, compliances, all the industry, best practices that are built in and all the new topnotch user experience that we are, uh, building with other customers can be also be, uh, utilized by a customer like pick pay. So you get this collective almost like evolutionary benefit. Yeah. By, uh, working with a company like us, >>You get a lot of economies of scale. Could you mind just sharing the URL for the company? So folks watching can go get, do a deep dive. Cause I'm you guys got a lot of, lot of, um, certifications under the covers, a lot of things you guys do. So you mind just sharing URL real quick. >>Yeah. So our company, uh, you can find everything about our company on sandberg.com like carrot pigeon. So, uh, you're sending a bird to send a message. So, uh, yeah. send.com >>All so let's get it to the application, cuz this is really interesting cuz Chad is table stakes now, but things are evolving beyond Chad. You gotta integrate that user experience. It's data. Now you gotta have scale. I mean, you know, people who wanna roll their own chat will find out there's a lot of client side and backend scale issues. Right. You can have a tsunami river like on Twitch, you know, you chat. I mean that, could you got client side issues, data scale. <laugh> right. You got backend. Um, Louis, talk about that dynamic because you know, as you start to scale, you want to rely on that. Talk about this dynamic, how apps now are integrating all these new features. So is it, are apps gonna go like more multifunctional? Do you see apps one and done? What's the, how do you guys see this app world playing out and where does, does the Sendbird fit in? And >>Just, just let me know better John, about the performance or about the, just, just let me >>Oh, slow with performance. Uh, performance is huge, right? You gotta have no one wants to have lag on, on chat. >>Okay. So, um, big pay when we look to the payments have millions, thousands of, of, of payments happen happening every second. So what we are doing now is moving all the payments through a conversation. So it always happened inside the conversation. So since from the first moment, um, every second counts to convert this client. And since from the first moment we never saw in, on Sandberg, any issue about that. And even when we have a question or something that we need to improve the team we're working together. So that that's, those are the points that are making us to work together and to make things going pretty fast. When we look to the users who are going to use chat, they are, their intention is three times better than the users who are not using payments through the chat. They are average. Average spent is three times higher too. >>So they, they are making more connections. They are chatting with their friends. They are friends are here. So the network effect is stronger. So if they're going to pay and they need to wait one more second, two seconds to conclude the payment, probably they will not go into choose paying through the, again, they will use only the wallet, only the code, only the Alliance of the user. So that's is so important for us to perform really, really fast. And then this is what we are finding. And this is what is happening with the integration with Sandberg. >>And what's interesting is, is that the by build chat with conversation, we just had a minute ago kind of plays in here. You get the benefits of Sandberg, but now your transactional fidelity is in the chat <laugh> that you don't build that you rely on them on. So again, that's an interesting dynamic. This is the future of apps, John, this is where it matters. The engagement. This is what you talk about is the new, the new digital experience who would've thought that five, 10 years ago. I mean, chat was just like, Hey, what's going around direct message. Now it's integral part of the app. What's your reading. >>Yeah. I mean, we're seeing that across, uh, uh, to Lewis's point, not just transactions, but like marketing messages are now being sent through chat. So the marketing is no longer just about like giving discount calls, but you can actually reengage with the brand. Uh, also support is becoming more real time through chat. So you're actually building a relationship. The support agents have a better context about the previous conversations and the transactions, the sales conversations, even like building, uh, building alerts, notification, all those things are now, uh, happening through conversations. And that's a better way for customers to engage with the brand cuz you actually, you're actually building a better relationship and also, uh, being able to trust the brand more because there is a channel for you to communicate and, and, and be seen and be heard, uh, by the brand. So we do believe that that's the future of the business and how more and more, uh, brands will be building relationships with their customers. >>Yeah. I love, I love your business model. I think it's really critical. And I think that stickiness is a real, uh, call out point there and the brand, the co-branding and the branding capability, but also really quickly in the last minute we have John and Luis, if you don't mind talking about security, I mean, I can't go a day now without getting an SMS scam, uh, text, uh, you seeing it now on WhatsApp. I mean, I don't even use telegram anymore. I mean, come on. So like, like this is now a problem. The old way has been infiltrated with spam and security issues. Security has to be there. The trust and security real quick, John, we'll start with you and we all Louis go, go ahead. >>No, no. Just, just to, to say how important is that we are not only a chatting platform. We are a payment platform, so we have money now, the transaction. So here in Brazil, we have all this safe, the, the, the layers, the security layers that we have in, on our app. And then we have the security layers provided from Sandburg. So, and when we look to the features, Sandberg are providing to us a lot of features that help users to feel safer like per refined profiles, like announcements, where it's a profile from peak pay, where the users can recognize. So this is peak pay talking with me. It's not a user trying to pass, trying to use big Bay's name to talk with me. So these issues is something that we are really, really, we really care about here because we are not only a chat platform. As I said before, we are a payment platform. We are a FinTech, we're at a digital bank. So we need to take care a lot and we don't have any complaint about it because Sandberg understood it. And then they, they, they are providing since the first moment with the perfect solutions and the user interface to make it simpler for the users to recognize that we speak, pay who is chatting with them, not a user with, with bad, bad intentions. >>Great, great insight, Louis. Thanks for sharing that, John really appreciate you guys coming on. Great showcase. Real final word. John will give you the final word folks watching out there. How do they engage with Sendbird? I want to integrate, I want to use your chat service. What do I do? Do I have to connect in as it managed service is the line of code. What do I do to get Sendbird? >>Yeah. So if you're a developer building a mobile application, simply come visit our website, we have a open documentation and SDK you can download and simply plug into your application. You can have a chat experience up and running matter of minutes, if not ours using our UI kit. So we want to make it as easy as possible for all the builders in the world to be able to harness the superpower of digital conversations. >>All right, great. Congratulations, John, on your success and all the growth and Louis, thanks for coming in, sharing the customer perspective and great insight. Thanks for coming on the showcase. Really appreciate it. Thanks for your time. >>Yeah. Thank you for having me. >>Okay. The a of us startup showcase season two, episode three here I'm John for your host. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Jun 29 2022

SUMMARY :

covering the exciting startups from the, a AWS ecosystem to talk about all the top trends So John talk about Sendbird real quick set the table for us. leading, uh, uh, customers such as big pay that we are going to showcase today, along with other, Well, it's always great to have, uh, one great success. So we are here, let's talk and it's a Well, I great to have you guys on great, great relationship. uh, uh, such a, you know, frictionless ver very responsive, modern experience on So really it's uh, we're like the Robin hood of the world trying to keep superpower yeah. And giving the entrepreneur an opportunity to have that same capability feature, rich Louise PPE. So we are putting together the chat platform and we with the Which is your app you're Sandberg to bring that scalability into So everybody who is going to pay, why did you, um, decide to, um, to use conversations in your mobile wallet? So it's important to say that we were born social. John, just give some context here, again, for the folks watching this is now expected, And then ultimately if you want to take it public in a large group setting, you can also support, you know, So can you walk us through what your vision was when you decided to integrate, So the main point that our first step was just to connect all, all the users between We're gonna get to that in the next segment about, you know, the future of apps one and done, So we are going to use this social interaction to improve the payment platform that we have. And here in the success they've had, you know, people want to plug in for services. So we had to build all of that ourselves, which became the foundation for se today. So we have, you know, security, compliances, all the industry, best practices that are built in and all the new topnotch user So you mind just sharing URL real quick. So, uh, you're sending a bird to send a message. You can have a tsunami river like on Twitch, you know, you chat. Oh, slow with performance. So it always happened inside the conversation. So the network effect is stronger. You get the benefits of Sandberg, but now your transactional fidelity is in the chat And that's a better way for customers to engage with the brand cuz you actually, in the last minute we have John and Luis, if you don't mind talking about security, I mean, I can't go a day now to make it simpler for the users to recognize that we speak, pay who is chatting with them, Thanks for sharing that, John really appreciate you guys coming on. we have a open documentation and SDK you can download and simply plug into your application. Thanks for coming on the showcase. Thanks for watching.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

John KimPERSON

0.99+

BrazilLOCATION

0.99+

SandbergORGANIZATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

two secondsQUANTITY

0.99+

Louis FernandoPERSON

0.99+

Luiz Fernando DinizPERSON

0.99+

2012DATE

0.99+

LouisePERSON

0.99+

three timesQUANTITY

0.99+

LuisPERSON

0.99+

2QUANTITY

0.99+

SendbirdORGANIZATION

0.99+

LewisPERSON

0.99+

first momentQUANTITY

0.99+

millionsQUANTITY

0.99+

second stepQUANTITY

0.99+

John ERPERSON

0.99+

first stepQUANTITY

0.99+

second startupQUANTITY

0.99+

hundredsQUANTITY

0.99+

LouisPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

over 200 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

99.9%QUANTITY

0.99+

over 300 employeesQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

four timesQUANTITY

0.98+

first companyQUANTITY

0.98+

MarTechORGANIZATION

0.98+

seven different countriesQUANTITY

0.98+

pick payTITLE

0.98+

SandburgORGANIZATION

0.98+

DenisePERSON

0.97+

3QUANTITY

0.97+

RedditORGANIZATION

0.97+

sandbarORGANIZATION

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.97+

todayDATE

0.96+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

one more secondQUANTITY

0.96+

a dayQUANTITY

0.96+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.95+

a minuteDATE

0.95+

fiveDATE

0.95+

DoorDashORGANIZATION

0.95+

WhatsAppORGANIZATION

0.94+

FirstQUANTITY

0.93+

more than 30 million active usersQUANTITY

0.93+

SASORGANIZATION

0.92+

over quarter billion usersQUANTITY

0.91+

4 yearsQUANTITY

0.9+

BrazilianOTHER

0.89+

80 startup showcaseQUANTITY

0.88+

PicPay SocialORGANIZATION

0.87+

ChadLOCATION

0.86+

Kickoff with Taylor Dolezal | Kubecon + Cloudnativecon Europe 2022


 

>> Announcer: "theCUBE" presents "Kubecon and Cloudnativecon Europe, 2022" brought to you by Red Hat, the Cloud Native Computing Foundation and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome to Valencia, Spain and "Kubecon + Cloudnativecon Europe, 2022." I'm Keith Townsend, and we're continuing the conversations with amazing people doing amazing things. I think we've moved beyond a certain phase of the hype cycle when it comes to Kubernetes. And we're going to go a little bit in detail with that today, and on all the sessions, I have today with me, Taylor Dolezal. New head of CNCF Ecosystem. So, first off, what does that mean new head of? You're the head of CNCF Ecosystem? What is the CNCF Ecosystem? >> Yeah. Yeah. It's really the end user ecosystem. So, the CNCF is comprised of really three pillars. And there's the governing board, they oversee the budget and fun things, make sure everything's signed and proper. Then there's the Technical Oversight Committee, TOC. And they really help decide the technical direction of the organization through deliberation and talking about which projects get invited and accepted. Projects get donated, and the TOC votes on who's going to make it in, based on all this criteria. And then, lastly, is the end user ecosystem, that encompasses a whole bunch of different working groups, special interest groups. And that's been really interesting to kind of get a deeper sense into, as of late. So, there are groups like the developer experience group, and the user research group. And those have very specific focuses that kind of go across all industries. But what we've seen lately, is that there are really deep wants to create, whether it be financial services user group, and things like that, because end users are having trouble with going to all of the different meetings. If you're a company, a vendor member company that's selling authentication software, or something in networking, makes sense to have a SIG network, SIG off, and those kinds of things. But when it comes down to like Boeing that just joined, does that make sense for them to jump into all those meetings? Or does it make sense to have some other kind of thing that is representative of them, so that they can attend that one thing, it's specific to their industry? They can get that download and kind of come up to speed, or find the best practices as quickly as possible in a nice synthesized way. >> So, you're 10 weeks into this role. You're coming from a customer environment. So, talk to me a little bit about the customer side of it? When you're looking at something, it's odd to call CNCF massive. But it is, 7.1 million members, and the number of contributing projects, et cetera. Talk to me about the view from the outside versus the view now that you're inside? >> Yeah, so honestly, it's been fun to kind of... For me, it's really mirrored the open-source journey. I've gone to Kubecon before, gotten to enjoy all of the booths, and trying to understand what's going on, and then worked for HashiCorp before coming to the CNCF. And so, get that vendor member kind of experience working the booth itself. So, kind of getting deeper and deeper into the stack of the conference itself. And I keep saying, vendor member and end user members, the difference between those, is end users are not organizations that sell cloud native services. Those are the groups that are kind of more consuming, the Airbnbs, the Boeings, the Mercedes, these people that use these technologies and want to kind of give that feedback back to these projects. But yeah, very incredibly massive and just sprawling when it comes to working in all those contexts. >> So, I have so many questions around, like the differences between having you as an end user and in inter-operating with vendors and the CNCF itself. So, let's start from the end user lens. When you're an end user and you're out discovering open-source and cloud native products, what's that journey like? How do you go from saying, okay, I'm primarily focused on vendor solutions, to let me look at this cloud native stack? >> Yeah, so really with that, there's been, I think that a lot of people have started to work with me and ask for, "Can we have recommended architectures? Can we have blueprints for how to do these things?" When the CNCF doesn't want to take that position, we don't want to kind of be the king maker and be like, this is the only way forward. We want to be inclusive, we want to pull in these projects, and kind of give everyone the same boot strap and jump... I missing the word of it, just ability to kind of like springboard off of that. Create a nice base for everybody to get started with, and then, see what works out, learn from one another. I think that when it comes to Kubernetes, and Prometheus, and some other projects, being able to share best practices between those groups of what works best as well. So, within all of the separations of the CNCF, I think that's something I've found really fun, is kind of like seeing how the projects relate to those verticals and those groups as well. Is how you run a project, might actually have a really good play inside of an organization like, "I like that idea. Let's try that out with our team." >> So, like this idea of springboarding. You know, is when an entrepreneur says, "You know what? I'm going to quit my job and springboard off into doing something new." There's a lot of uncertainty, but for enterprise, that can be really scary. Like we're used to our big vendors, HashiCorp, VMware, Cisco kind of guiding us and telling us like, what's next? What is that experience like, springboarding off into something as massive as cloud native? >> So, I think it's really, it's a great question. So, I think that's why the CNCF works so well, is the fact that it's a safe place for all these companies to come together, even companies of competing products. you know, having that common vision of, we want to make production boring again, we don't want to have so much sprawl and have to take in so much knowledge at once. Can we kind of work together to create all these things to get rid of our adminis trivia or maintenance tasks? I think that when it comes to open-source in general, there's a fantastic book it's called "Working in Public," it's by Stripe Press. I recommend it all over the place. It's orange, so you'll recognize it. Yeah, it's easy to see. But it's really good 'cause it talks about the maintainer journey, and what things make it difficult. And so, I think that that's what the CNCF is really working hard to try to get rid of, is all this monotonous, all these monotonous things, filing issues, best practices. How do you adopt open-source within your organization? We have tips and tricks, and kind of playbooks in ways that you could accomplish that. So, that's what I find really useful for those kinds of situations. Then it becomes easier to adopt that within your organization. >> So, I asked Priyanka, CNCF executive director last night, a pretty tough question. And this is kind of in the meat of what you do. What happens when you? Let's pick on service mesh 'cause everyone likes to pick on service mesh. >> XXXX: Yeah. >> What happens when there's differences at that vendor level on the direction of a CIG or a project, or the ecosystem around service mesh? >> Yeah, so that's the fun part. Honestly, is 'cause people get to hash it out. And so, I think that's been the biggest thing for me finding out, was that there's more than one way to do thing. And so, I think it always comes down to use case. What are you trying to do? And then you get to solve after that. So, it really is, I know it depends, which is the worst answer. But I really do think that's the case, because if you have people that are using something within the automotive space, or in the financial services space, they're going to have completely different needs, wants, you know, some might need to run Coball or Fortran, others might not have to. So, even at that level, just down to what your tech stack looks like, audits, and those kinds of things, that can just really differ. So, I think it does come down to something more like that. >> So, the CNCF loosely has become kind of a standards body. And it's centered around the core project Kubernetes? >> Mm-hmm. >> So, what does it mean, when we're looking at larger segments such as service mesh or observability, et cetera, to be Kubernetes compliant? Where's the point, if any, that the CNCF steps in versus just letting everyone hash it out? Is it Kubernetes just need to be Kubernetes compliant and everything else is free for all? >> Honestly, in many cases, it's up to the communities themselves to decide that. So, the groups that are running OCI, the Open Container Interface, Open Storage Interface, all of those things that we've agreed on as ways to implement those technologies, I think that's where the CNCF, that's the line. That's where the CNCF gets up to. And then, it's like we help foster those communities and those conversations and asking, does this work for you? If not, let's talk about it, let's figure out why it might not. And then, really working closely with community to kind of help bring those things forward and create action items. >> So, it's all about putting the right people in the rooms and not necessarily playing referee, but to get people in the right room to have and facilitate the conversation? >> Absolutely. Absolutely. Like all of the booths behind us could have their own conferences, but we want to bring everybody together to have those conversations. And again, sprawling can be really wild at certain times, but it's good to have those cross understandings, or to hear from somebody that you're like, "Oh, my goodness, I didn't even think about that kind of context or use case." So, really inclusive conversation. >> So, organizations like Boeing, Adobe, Microsoft, from an end user perspective, it's sometimes difficult to get those organizations into these types of communities. How do you encourage them to participate in the conversation 'cause their voice is extremely important? >> Yeah, that I'd also say it really is the community. I really liked the Kubernetes documentary that was put out, working with some of the CNCF folks and core, and beginning Kubernetes contributors and maintainers. And it just kind of blew me away when they had said, you know, what we thought was success, was seeing Kubernetes in an Amazon Data Center. That's when we knew that this was going to take root. And you'd rarely hear that, is like, "When somebody that we typically compete with, its success is seeing it, seeing them use that." And so, I thought was really cool. >> You know, I like to use this technology for my community of skipping rope. You see the girls and boys jumping double Dutch rope. And you think, "I can do that. Like it's just jumping." But there's this hesitation to actually, how do you start? How do you get inside of it? The question is how do you become a member of the community? We've talked a lot about what happens when you're in the community. But how do you join the community? >> So, really, there's a whole bunch of ways that you can. Actually, the shirt that I'm wearing, I got from the 114 Release. So, this is just a fun example of that community. And just kind of how welcoming and inviting that they are. Really, I do think it's kind of like a job breaker. Almost you start at the outside, you start using these technologies, even more generally like, what is DevOps? What is production? How do I get to infrastructure, architecture, or software engineering? Once you start there, you start working your way in, you develop a stack, and then you start to see these tools, technologies, workflows. And then, after you've kind of gotten a good amount of time spent with it, you might really enjoy it like that, and then want to help contribute like, "I like this, but it would be great to have a function that did this. Or I want a feature that does that." At that point in time, you can either take a look at the source code on GitHub, or wherever it's hosted, and then start to kind of come up with that, some ideas to contribute back to that. And then, beyond that, you can actually say, "No, I kind of want to have these conversations with people." Join in those special interest groups, and those meetings to kind of talk about things. And then, after a while, you can kind of find yourself in a contributor role, and then a maintainer role. After that, if you really like the project, and want to kind of work with community on that front. So, I think you had asked before, like Microsoft, Adobe and these others. Really it's about steering the projects. It's these communities want these things, and then, these companies say, "Okay, this is great. Let's join in the conversation with the community." And together again, inclusivity, and bringing everybody to the table to have that discussion and push things forward. >> So, Taylor, closing message. What would you want people watching this show to get when they think about ecosystem and CNCF? >> So, ecosystem it's a big place, come on in. Yeah, (laughs) the water's just fine. I really want people to take away the fact that... I think really when it comes down to, it really is the community, it's you. We are the end user ecosystem. We're the people that build the tools, and we need help. No matter how big or small, when you come in and join the community, you don't have to rewrite the Kubernetes scheduler. You can help make documentation that much more easy to understand, and in doing so, helping thousands of people, If I'm going through the instructions or reading a paragraph, doesn't make sense, that has such a profound impact. And I think a lot of people miss that. It's like, even just changing punctuation can have such a giant difference. >> Yeah, I think people sometimes forget that community, especially community-run projects, they need product managers. They need people that will help with communications, people that will help with messaging, websites updating. Just reachability, anywhere from developing code to developing documentation, there's ways to jump in and help the community. From Valencia, Spain, I'm Keith Townsend, and you're watching "theCUBE," the leader in high tech coverage. (bright upbeat music)

Published Date : May 20 2022

SUMMARY :

brought to you by Red Hat, and on all the sessions, and the user research group. and the number of contributing Those are the groups that So, let's start from the end user lens. and kind of give everyone the I'm going to quit my job and have to take in so the meat of what you do. Yeah, so that's the fun part. So, the CNCF loosely has So, the groups that are running OCI, Like all of the booths behind us participate in the conversation I really liked the Kubernetes become a member of the community? and those meetings to What would you want people it really is the community, it's you. and help the community.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
PriyankaPERSON

0.99+

BoeingORGANIZATION

0.99+

AdobeORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Keith TownsendPERSON

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Cloud Native Computing FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

Taylor DolezalPERSON

0.99+

TaylorPERSON

0.99+

TOCORGANIZATION

0.99+

Stripe PressORGANIZATION

0.99+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.99+

CNCFORGANIZATION

0.99+

MercedesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Technical Oversight CommitteeORGANIZATION

0.99+

BoeingsORGANIZATION

0.99+

PrometheusTITLE

0.99+

CoballORGANIZATION

0.99+

Valencia, SpainLOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

7.1 million membersQUANTITY

0.99+

HashiCorpORGANIZATION

0.98+

KubeconORGANIZATION

0.98+

AirbnbsORGANIZATION

0.98+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.98+

last nightDATE

0.97+

GitHubORGANIZATION

0.97+

FortranORGANIZATION

0.97+

firstQUANTITY

0.96+

KubernetesTITLE

0.95+

Working in PublicTITLE

0.93+

Amazon Data CenterORGANIZATION

0.92+

DutchOTHER

0.92+

thousands of peopleQUANTITY

0.91+

theCUBETITLE

0.91+

more than one wayQUANTITY

0.9+

CloudnativeconORGANIZATION

0.89+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.86+

KubernetesORGANIZATION

0.84+

DevOpsTITLE

0.84+

CNCF EcosystemORGANIZATION

0.83+

one thingQUANTITY

0.83+

three pillarsQUANTITY

0.82+

EuropeLOCATION

0.79+

Open Container InterfaceOTHER

0.77+

doubleQUANTITY

0.76+

OCIOTHER

0.73+

Cloudnativecon EuropeORGANIZATION

0.69+

Open Storage InterfaceOTHER

0.62+

2022DATE

0.58+

CIGORGANIZATION

0.53+

2022TITLE

0.46+

114 ReleaseORGANIZATION

0.38+

Jon Dahl, Mux | AWS Startup Showcase S2 E2


 

(upbeat music) >> Welcome, everyone, to theCUBE's presentation of the AWS Startup Showcase. And this episode two of season two is called "Data as Code," the ongoing series covering exciting new startups in the AWS ecosystem. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. Today, we're excited to be joined by Jon Dahl, who is the co-founder and CEO of MUX, a hot new startup building cloud video for developers, video with data. John, great to see you. We did an interview on theCube Conversation. Went into big detail of the awesomeness of your company and the trend that you're on. Welcome back. >> Thank you, glad to be here. >> So, video is everywhere, and video for pivot to video, you hear all these kind of terms in the industry, but now more than ever, video is everywhere and people are building with it, and it's becoming part of the developer experience in applications. So people have to stand up video into their code fast, and data is code, video is data. So you guys are specializing this. Take us through that dynamic. >> Yeah, so video clearly is a growing part of how people are building applications. We see a lot of trends of categories that did not involve video in the past making a major move towards video. I think what Peloton did five years ago to the world of fitness, that was not really a big category. Now video fitness is a huge thing. Video in education, video in business settings, video in a lot of places. I think Marc Andreessen famously said, "Software is eating the world" as a pretty, pretty good indicator of what the internet is actually doing to the economy. I think there's a lot of ways in which video right now is eating software. So categories that we're not video first are becoming video first. And that's what we help with. >> It's not obvious to like most software developers when they think about video, video industries, it's industry shows around video, NAB, others. People know, the video folks know what's going on in video, but when you start to bring it mainstream, it becomes an expectation in the apps. And it's not that easy, it's almost a provision video is hard for a developer 'cause you got to know the full, I guess, stack of video. That's like low level and then kind of just basic high level, just play something. So, in between, this is a media stack kind of dynamic. Can you talk about how hard it is to build video for developers? How is it going to become easier? >> Yeah, I mean, I've lived this story for too long, maybe 13 years now, when I first build my first video stack. And, you know, I'll sometimes say, I think it's kind of a miracle every time a video plays on the internet because the internet is not a medium designed for video. It's been hijacked by video, video is 70% of internet traffic today in an unreliable, sort of untrusted network space, which is totally different than how television used to work or cable or things like that. So yeah, so video is hard because there's so many problems from top to bottom that need to be solved to make video work. So you have to worry about video compression encoding, which is a complicated topic in itself. You have to worry about delivering video around the world at scale, delivering it at low cost, at low latency, with good performance, you have to worry about devices and how every device, Android, iOS, web, TVs, every device handles video differently and so there's a lot of work there. And at the end of the day, these are kind of unofficial standards that everyone's using. So one of the miracles is like, if you want to watch a video, somehow you have to get like Apple and Google to agree on things, which is not always easy. And so there's just so many layers of complexity that are behind it. I think one way to think about it is, if you want to put an image online, you just put an image online. And if you want to put video online, you build complex software, and that's the exact problem that MUX was started to help solve. >> It's interesting you guys have almost creating a whole new category around video infrastructure. And as you look at, you mentioned stack, video stack. I'm looking at a market where the notion of a media stack is developing, and you're seeing these verticals having similar dynamics with cloud. And if you go back to the early days of cloud computing, what was the developer experience or entrepreneurial experience, you had to actually do a lot of stuff before you even do anything, provision a server. And this has all kind of been covered in great detail in the glory of Agile and whatnot. It was expensive, and you had that actually engineer before you could even stand up any code. Now you got video that same thing's happening. So the developers have two choices, go do a bunch of stuff complex, building their own infrastructure, which is like building a data center, or lean in on MUX and say, "Hey, thank you for doing all that years of experience building out the stacks to take that hard part away," but using APIs that they have. This is a developer focused problem that you guys are solving. >> Yeah, that's right. my last company was a company called Zencoder, that was an API to video encoding. So it was kind of an API to a small part of what MUX does today, just one of those problems. And I think the thing that we got right at Zencoder, that we're doing again here at MUX, was building four developers first. So our number one persona is a software developer. Not necessarily a video expert, just we think any developer should be able to build with video. It shouldn't be like, yeah, got to go be a specialist to use this technology, because it should become just of the internet. Video should just be something that any developer can work with. So yeah, so we build for developers first, which means we spend a lot of time thinking about API design, we spend a lot of time thinking about documentation, transparent pricing, the right features, great support and all those kind of things that tend to be characteristics of good developer companies. >> Tell me about the pipe lining of the products. I'm a developer, I work for a company, my boss is putting pressure on me. We need video, we have all this library, it's all stacking up. We hired some people, they left. Where's the video, we've stored it somewhere. I mean, it's a nightmare, right? So I'm like, okay, I'm cloud native, I got an API. I need to get my product to market fast, 'cause that is what Agile developers want. So how do you describe that acceleration for time to market? You mentioned you guys are API first, video first. How do these customers get their product into the market as fast as possible? >> Yeah, well, I mean the first thing we do is we put what we think is probably on average, three to four months of hard engineering work behind a single API call. So if you want to build a video platform, we tell our customers like, "Hey, you can do that." You probably need a team, you probably need video experts on your team so hire them or train them. And then it takes several months just to kind of to get video flowing. One API call at MUX gives you on-demand video or live video that works at scale, works around the world with good performance, good reliability, a rich feature set. So maybe just a couple specific examples, we worked with Robin Hood a few years ago to bring video into their newsfeed, which was hugely successful for them. And they went from talking to us for the first time to a big launch in, I think it was three months, but the actual code time there was like really short. I want to say they had like a proof of concept up and running in a couple days, and then the full launch in three months. Another customer of ours, Bandcamp, I think switched from a legacy provider to MUX in two weeks in band. So one of the big advantages of going a little bit higher in the abstraction layer than just building it yourself is that time to market. >> Talk about this notion of video pipeline 'cause I know I've heard people I talk about, "Hey, I just want to get my product out there. I don't want to get stuck in the weeds on video pipeline." What does that mean for folks that aren't understanding the nuances of video? >> Yeah, I mean, it's all the steps that it takes to publish video. So from ingesting the video, if it's live video from making sure that you have secure, reliable ingest of that live feed potentially around the world to the transcoding, which is we talked a little bit about, but it is a, you know, on its own is a massively complicated problem. And doing that, well, doing that well is hard. Part of the reason it's hard is you really have to know where you're publishing too. And you might want to transcode video differently for different devices, for different types of content. You know, the pipeline typically would also include all of the workflow items you want to do with the video. You want to thumbnail a video, you want clip, create clips of the video, maybe you want to restream the video to Facebook or Twitter or a social platform. You want to archive the video, you want it to be available for downloads after an event. If it's just a, if it's a VOD upload, if it's not live in the first place. You have all those things and you might want to do simulated live with the video. You might want to actually record something and then play it back as a live stream. So, the pipeline Ty typically refers to everything from the ingest of the video to the time that the bits are delivered to a device. >> You know, I hear a lot of people talking about video these days, whether it's events, training, just want peer to peer experience, video is powerful, but customers want to own their own platform, right? They want to have the infrastructure as a service. They kind of want platform as a service, this is cloud talk now, but they want to have their own capability to build it out. This allows them to get what they want. And so you see this, like, is it SaaS? Is it platform? People want customization? So kind of the general purpose video solution does it really exist or doesn't? I mean, 'cause this is the question. Can I just buy software and work or is it going to be customized always? How do you see that? Because this becomes a huge discussion point. Is it a SaaS product or someone's going to make a SaaS product? >> Yeah, so I think one of the most important elements of designing any software, but especially when you get into infrastructure is choosing an abstraction level. So if you think of computing, you can go all the way down to building a data center, you can go all the way down to getting a colo and racking a server like maybe some of us used to do, who are older than others. And that's one way to run a server. On the other extreme, you have just think of the early days of cloud competing, you had app engine, which was a really fantastic, really incredible product. It was one push deploy of, I think Python code, if I remember correctly, and everything just worked. But right in the middle of those, you had EC2, which was, EC2 is basically an API to a server. And it turns out that that abstraction level, not Colo, not the full app engine kind of platform, but the API to virtual server was the right abstraction level for maybe the last 15 years. Maybe now some of the higher level application platforms are doing really well, maybe the needs will shift. But I think that's a little bit of how we think about video. What developers want is an API to video. They don't want an API to the building blocks of video, an API to transcoding, to video storage, to edge caching. They want an API to video. On the other extreme, they don't want a big application that's a drop in white label video in a box like a Shopify kind of thing. Shopify is great, but developers don't want to build on top of Shopify. In the payments world developers want Stripe. And that abstraction level of the API to the actual thing you're getting tends to be the abstraction level that developers want to build on. And the reason for that is, it's the most productive layer to build on. You get maximum flexibility and also maximum velocity when you have that API directly to a function like video. So, we like to tell our customers like you, you own your video when you build on top of MUX, you have full control over everything, how it's stored, when it's stored, where it goes, how it's published, we handle all of the hard technology and we give our customers all of the flexibility in terms of designing their products. >> I want to get back some use case, but you brought that up I might as well just jump to my next point. I'd like you to come back and circle back on some references 'cause I know you have some. You said building on infrastructure that you own, this is a fundamental cloud concept. You mentioned API to a server for the nerds out there that know that that's cool, but the people who aren't super nerdy, that means you're basically got an interface into a server behind the scenes. You're doing the same for video. So, that is a big thing around building services. So what wide range of services can we expect beyond MUX? If I'm going to have an API to video, what could I do possibly? >> What sort of experience could you build? >> Yes, I got a team of developers saying I'm all in API to video, I don't want to do all that transit got straight there, I want to build experiences, video experiences on my app. >> Yeah, I mean, I think, one way to think about it is that, what's the range of key use cases that people do with video? We tend to think about six at MUX, one is kind of the places where the content is, the prop. So one of the things that use video is you can create great video. Think of online courses or fitness or entertainment or news or things like that. That's kind of the first thing everyone thinks of, when you think video, you think Netflix, and that's great. But we see a lot of really interesting uses of video in the world of social media. So customers of ours like Visco, which is an incredible photo sharing application, really for photographers who really care about the craft. And they were able to bring video in and bring that same kind of Visco experience to video using MUX. We think about B2B tools, videos. When you think about it, all video is, is a high bandwidth way of communicating. And so customers are as like HubSpot use video for the marketing platform, for business collaboration, you'll see a lot of growth of video in terms of helping businesses engage their customers or engage with their employees. We see live events obviously have been a massive category over the last few years. You know, we were all forced into a world where we had to do live events two years ago, but I think now we're reemerging into a world where the online part of a conference will be just as important as the in-person component of a conference. So that's another big use case we see. >> Well, full disclosure, if you're watching this live right now, it's being powered by MUX. So shout out, we use MUX on theCUBE platform that you're experiencing in this. Actually in real time, 'cause this is one application, there's many more. So video as code, is data as code is the theme, that's going to bring up the data ops. Video also is code because (laughs) it's just like you said, it's just communicating, but it gets converted to data. So data ops, video ops could be its own new category. What's your reaction to that? >> Yeah, I mean, I think, I have a couple thoughts on that. The first thought is, video is a way that, because the way that companies interact with customers or users, it's really important to have good monitoring and analytics of your video. And so the first product we ever built was actually a product called MUX video, sorry, MUX data, which is the best way to monitor a video platform at scale. So we work with a lot of the big broadcasters, we work with like CBS and Fox Sports and Discovery. We work with big tech companies like Reddit and Vimeo to help them monitor their video. And you just get a huge amount of insight when you look at robust analytics about video delivery that you can use to optimize performance, to make sure that streaming works well globally, especially in hard to reach places or on every device. That's we actually build a MUX data platform first because when we started MUX, we spent time with some of our friends at companies like YouTube and Netflix, and got to know how they use data to power their video platforms. And they do really sophisticated things with data to ensure that their streams well, and we wanted to build the product that would help everyone else do that. So, that's one use. I think the other obvious use is just really understanding what people are doing with their video, who's watching what, what's engaging, those kind of things. >> Yeah, data is definitely there. You guys mentioned some great brands that are working with you guys, and they're doing it because of the developer experience. And I'd like you to explain, if you don't mind, in your words, why is the MUX developer experience so good? What are some of the results you're seeing from your customers? What are they saying to you? Obviously when you win, you get good feedback. What are some of the things that they're saying and what specific develop experiences do they like the best? >> Yeah, I mean, I think that the most gratifying thing about being a startup founder is when your customers like what you're doing. And so we get a lot of this, but it's always, we always pay attention to what customers say. But yeah, people, the number one thing developers say when they think about MUX is that the developer experience is great. I think when they say that, what they mean is two things, first is it's easy to work with, which helps them move faster, software velocity is so important. Every company in the world is investing and wants to move quickly and to build quickly. And so if you can help a team speed up, that's massively valuable. The second thing I think when people like our developer experience is, you know, in a lot of ways that think that we get out of the way and we let them do what they want to do. So well, designed APIs are a key part of that, coming back to abstraction, making sure that you're not forcing customers into decisions that they actually want to make themselves. Like, if our video player only had one design, that that would not be, that would not work for most developers, 'cause developers want to bring their own design and style and workflow and feel to their video. And so, yeah, so I think the way we do that is just think comprehensively about how APIs are designed, think about the workflows that users are trying to accomplish with video, and make sure that we have the right APIs, make sure they're the right information, we have the right webhooks, we have the right SDKs, all of those things in place so that they can build what they want. >> We were just having a conversation on theCUBE, Dave Vellante and I, and our team, and I'd love to get you a reaction to this. And it's more and more, a riff real quick. We're seeing a trend where video as code, data as code, media stack, where you're starting to see the emergence of the media developer, where the application of media looks a lot like kind of software developer, where the app, media as an app. It could be a chat, it could be a peer to peer video, it could be part of an event platform, but with all the recent advances, in UX designers, coders, the front end looks like an emergence of these creators that are essentially media developers for all intent and purpose, they're coding media. What's your reaction to that? How do you see that evolving? >> I think the. >> Or do you agree with it? >> It's okay. >> Yeah, yeah. >> Well, I think a couple things. I think one thing, I think this goes along through saying, but maybe it's disagreement, is that we don't think you should have to be an expert at video or at media to create and produce or create and publish good video, good audio, good images, those kind of things. And so, you know, I think if you look at software overall, I think of 10 years ago, the kind of DevOps movement, where there was kind of a movement away from specialization in software where the same software developer could build and deploy the same software developer maybe could do front end and back end. And we want to bring that to video as well. So you don't have to be a specialist to do it. On the other hand, I do think that investments and tooling, all the way from video creation, which is not our world, but there's a lot of amazing companies out there that are making it easier to produce video, to shoot video, to edit, a lot of interesting innovations there all the way to what we do, which is helping people stream and publish video and video experiences. You know, I think another way about it is, that tool set and companies doing that let anyone be a media developer, which I think is important. >> It's like DevOps turning into low-code, no-code, eventually it's just composability almost like just, you know, "Hey Siri, give me some video." That kind of thing. Final question for you why I got you here, at the end of the day, the decision between a lot of people's build versus buy, "I got to get a developer. Why not just roll my own?" You mentioned data center, "I want to build a data center." So why MUX versus do it yourself? >> Yeah, I mean, part of the reason we started this company is we have a pretty, pretty strong opinion on this. When you think about it, when we started MUX five years ago, six years ago, if you were a developer and you wanted to accept credit cards, if you wanted to bring payment processing into your application, you didn't go build a payment gateway. You just probably used Stripe. And if you wanted to send text messages, you didn't build your own SMS gateway, you probably used Twilio. But if you were a developer and you wanted to stream video, you built your own video gateway, you built your own video application, which was really complex. Like we talked about, you know, probably three, four months of work to get something basic up and running, probably not live video that's probably only on demand video at that point. And you get no benefit by doing it yourself. You're no better than anyone else because you rolled your own video stack. What you get is risk that you might not do a good job, maybe you do worse than your competitors, and you also get distraction where you've just taken, you take 10 engineers and 10 sprints and you apply it to a problem that doesn't actually really give you differentiated value to your users. So we started MUX so that people would not have to do that. It's fine if you want to build your own video platform, once you get to a certain scale, if you can afford a dozen engineers for a VOD platform and you have some really massively differentiated use case, you know, maybe, live is, I don't know, I don't have the rule of thumb, live videos maybe five times harder than on demand video to work with. But you know, in general, like there's such a shortage of software engineers today and software engineers have, frankly, are in such high demand. Like you see what happens in the marketplace and the hiring markets, how competitive it is. You need to use your software team where they're maximally effective, and where they're maximally effective is building differentiation into your products for your customers. And video is just not that, like very few companies actually differentiate on their video technology. So we want to be that team for everyone else. We're 200 people building the absolute best video infrastructure as APIs for developers and making that available to everyone else. >> John, great to have you on with the showcase, love the company, love what you guys do. Video as code, data as code, great stuff. Final plug for the company, for the developers out there and prospects watching for MUX, why should they go to MUX? What are you guys up to? What's the big benefit? >> I mean, first, just check us out. Try try our APIs, read our docs, talk to our support team. We put a lot of work into making our platform the best, you know, as you dig deeper, I think you'd be looking at the performance around, the global performance of what we do, looking at our analytics stack and the insight you get into video streaming. We have an emerging open source video player that's really exciting, and I think is going to be the direction that open source players go for the next decade. And then, you know, we're a quickly growing team. We're 60 people at the beginning of last year. You know, we're one 50 at the beginning of this year, and we're going to a add, we're going to grow really quickly again this year. And this whole team is dedicated to building the best video structure for developers. >> Great job, Jon. Thank you so much for spending the time sharing the story of MUX here on the show, Amazon Startup Showcase season two, episode two, thanks so much. >> Thank you, John. >> Okay, I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. This is season two, episode two, the ongoing series cover the most exciting startups from the AWS Cloud Ecosystem. Talking data analytics here, video cloud, video as a service, video infrastructure, video APIs, hottest thing going on right now, and you're watching it live here on theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Mar 30 2022

SUMMARY :

Went into big detail of the of terms in the industry, "Software is eating the world" People know, the video folks And if you want to put video online, And if you go back to the just of the internet. lining of the products. So if you want to build a video platform, the nuances of video? all of the workflow items you So kind of the general On the other extreme, you have just think infrastructure that you own, saying I'm all in API to video, So one of the things that use video is it's just like you said, that you can use to optimize performance, And I'd like you to is that the developer experience is great. you a reaction to this. that to video as well. at the end of the day, the absolute best video infrastructure love the company, love what you guys do. and the insight you get of MUX here on the show, from the AWS Cloud Ecosystem.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Marc AndreessenPERSON

0.99+

Jon DahlPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

CBSORGANIZATION

0.99+

13 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

JonPERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

10 engineersQUANTITY

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

VimeoORGANIZATION

0.99+

DiscoveryORGANIZATION

0.99+

RedditORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 sprintsQUANTITY

0.99+

two weeksQUANTITY

0.99+

Fox SportsORGANIZATION

0.99+

60 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

200 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

PythonTITLE

0.99+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.99+

four monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

SiriTITLE

0.99+

iOSTITLE

0.99+

three monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

six years agoDATE

0.99+

EC2TITLE

0.99+

first thoughtQUANTITY

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

BandcampORGANIZATION

0.99+

next decadeDATE

0.99+

five years agoDATE

0.99+

first productQUANTITY

0.99+

Data as CodeTITLE

0.99+

MUXORGANIZATION

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

five timesQUANTITY

0.99+

ViscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

AndroidTITLE

0.98+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.98+

first timeQUANTITY

0.98+

this yearDATE

0.98+

ZencoderORGANIZATION

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

last yearDATE

0.98+

10 years agoDATE

0.98+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.98+

two choicesQUANTITY

0.98+

Robin HoodPERSON

0.97+

two years agoDATE

0.97+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.97+

HubSpotORGANIZATION

0.96+

one applicationQUANTITY

0.96+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

ShopifyORGANIZATION

0.96+

one designQUANTITY

0.96+

one thingQUANTITY

0.96+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.95+

first videoQUANTITY

0.95+

second thingQUANTITY

0.95+

one wayQUANTITY

0.94+

AgileTITLE

0.94+

one pushQUANTITY

0.93+

first thingQUANTITY

0.92+

Steven Mih, Ahana & Girish Baliga, Uber | CUBE Conversation


 

(bright music) >> Hey everyone, welcome to this CUBE conversation featuring Ahana, I'm your host Lisa Martin. I've got two guests here with me today. Steven Mih joins us, the Presto Foundation governing board member, co-founder and CEO of Ahana, and Girish Baliga Presto Foundation governing board chair and senior engineering manager at Uber. Guys thanks for joining us. >> Thanks for having us. >> Thanks for having us. >> So Steven we're going to dig into and unpack Presto in the next few minutes or so, but Steven let's go ahead and start with you. Talk to us about some of the challenges with the open data lake house market. What are some of those key challenges that organizations are facing? >> Yeah, just pulling up the slide you know, what we see is that many organizations are dealing with a lot more data and very different data types and putting that all into, traditionally as the data warehouse, which has been the workhorse for BI and analytics traditionally, it becomes very, very expensive, and there's a lot of lock in associated with that. And so what's happening is that people are putting the data semistructured and unstructured data for example, in cloud data lakes or other data lakes, and they find that they can query directly with a SQL query engine like Presto. And that lets you have a much more approach to dealing with getting insights out of your data. And that's what this is all about, and that's why companies are moving to a modern architecture. Girish maybe you can share some of your thoughts on how Uber uses Presto for this. >> Yeah, at Uber we use Presto in our internal deployments. So at Uber we have our own data centers, we store data locally in our data centers, but we have made the conscious choice to go with an open data stack. Our entire data stack is built around open source technologies like Hadoop, Hive, Spark and Presto. And so Presto is an invaluable engine that is able to connect to all these different storage and data formats and allow us to have a single entry point for our users, to run their SQL engines and get insights rather quickly compared to some of the other engines that we have at Uber. >> So let's talk a little bit about Presto so that the audience gets a good overview of that. Steven starting with you, you talked about the challenges of the traditional data warehouse application. Talk to us about why Presto was founded the open, the project, give us that background information if you will. >> Absolutely, so Presto was originally developed out of the biggest hyperscaler out there which is Facebook now known as Meta. And they donated that project to the, and open sourced it and donated it to the Linux Foundation. And so Presto is a SQL query engine, it's a storage SQL query engine, that runs directly on open data lakes, so you can put your data into open formats like 4K or C, and get insights directly from that at a very good price performance ratio. The Presto Foundation of which Girish and I are part of, we're all working together as a consortium of companies that all want to see Presto continue to get bigger and bigger. Kind of like Kubernetes has a, has an organization called CNCF, Presto has Presto Foundation all under the umbrella of the Linux Foundation. And so there's a lot of exciting things that are coming on the roadmap that make Presto very unique. You know, RaptorX is a multilevel caching system that it's been fantastic, Aria optimizations are another area, we Ahana have developed some security features with donating the integrations with Apache Ranger and that's the type of things that we do to help the community. But maybe Girish can talk about some of the exciting items on the roadmap that you're looking forward to. >> Absolutely, I think from Uber's point of view just a sheer scale of data and our volume of query traffic. So we run about half a million Presto queries a day, right? And we have thousands of machines in our Presto deployments. So at that scale in addition to functionality you really want a system that can handle traffic reliably, that can scale, and that is backed by a strong community which guarantees that if you pull in the new version of Presto, you won't break anything, right? So all of those things are very important to us. So I think that's where we are relying on our partners particularly folks like Facebook and Twitter and Ahana to build and maintain this ecosystem that gives us those guarantees. So that is on the reliability front, but on the roadmap side we are also excited to see where Presto is extending. So in addition to the projects that Steven talked about, we are also looking at things like Presto and Spark, right? So take the Presto SQL and run it as a Spark job for instance, or running Presto on real-time analytics applications something that we built and contributed from Uber side. So we are all taking it in very different directions, we all have different use cases to support, and that's the exciting thing about the foundation. That it allows us all to work together to get Presto to a bigger and better and more flexible engine. >> You guys mentioned Facebook and I saw on the slide I think Twitter as well. Talk to me about some of the organizations that are leveraging the Presto engine and some of the business benefits. I think Steve you talked about insights, Steven obviously being able to get insights from data is critical for every business these days. >> Yeah, a major, major use case is finding the ad hoc and interactive queries, and being able to drive insights from doing so. And so, as I mentioned there's so much data that's being generated and stored, and to be able to query that data in place, at a, with very, very high performance, meaning that you can get answers back in seconds of time. That lets you have the interactive ability to drill into data and innovate your business. And so this is fantastic because it's been developed at hyperscalers like Uber that allow you to have open source technology, pick that up, and just download it right from prestodb.io, and then start to run with this and join the community. I think from an open source perspective this project under the governance of Linux Foundation gives you the confidence that it's fully transparent and you'll never see any licensing changes by the Linux Foundation charter. And therefore that means the technology remains free forever without later on limitations occurring, which then would perhaps favor commercialization of any one vendor. That's not the case. So maybe Girish your thoughts on how we've been able to attract industry giants to collaborate, to innovate further, and your thoughts on that. >> Yeah, so of the interesting I've seen in the space is that there is a bifurcation of companies in this ecosystem. So there are these large internet scale companies like Facebook, and Uber, and Twitter, which basically want to use something like Presto for their internal use cases. And then there is the second set of companies, enterprise companies like Ahana which basically wanted to take Presto and provide it as a service for other companies to use as an alternative to things like Snowflake and other systems right? So, and the foundation is a great place for both sets of companies to come together and work. The internet scale companies bring in the scale, the reliability, the different kind of ways in which you can challenge the system, optimize it, and so forth, and then companies like Ahana bring in the flexibility and the extensibility. So you can work with different clouds, different storage formats, different engines, and I think it's a great partnership that we can see happening primarily through the foundational spaces. Which you would be hard pressed to find in a single vendor or a, you know, a single-source system that is there on the market today. >> How long ago was the Presto Foundation initiated? >> It's been over three years now and it's been going strong, we're over a dozen members and it's open to everyone. And it's all governed like the Linux Foundation so we use best practices from that and you can just check it out at prestodb.io where you can get the software, or you can hear about how to join the foundation. So it includes members like Intel, and HPE as well, and we're really excited for new members to come, and contribute in and participate. >> Sounds like you've got good momentum there in the foundation. Steven talk a little bit about the last two years. Have you seen the acceleration in use cases in the number of users as we've been in such an interesting environment where the need for real-time insights is essential for every business initially a few couple of years ago to survive but now to be, to really thrive, is it, have you seen the acceleration in Presto in that timeframe? >> Absolutely, we see there's acceleration of being more data-driven and especially moving to cloud and having more data in the cloud, we think that innovation is happening, digital innovation is happening very fast and Presto is a major enabler of that, again, being able to get, drive insights from the data this is not just your typical business data, it's now getting into really clickstream data, knowing about how customers are operating today, Uber is a great example of all the different types of innovations they can drive, whether it be, you know, knowing in real time what's happening with rides, or offering you a subscription for special deals to use the service more. So, you know, Ahana we really love Presto, and we provide a SaaS manage service of the open source and provide free trials, and help people get up to speed that may not have the same type of skills as Uber or Facebook does. And we work with all companies in that way. >> Think about the consumers these days, we're very demanding, right? When I think one of the things that was in short supply during the last two years was patience. And if I think of Uber as a great example, I want to know if I'm asking for a ride I want to know exactly in real time what's coming for me? Where is it now? How many more minutes is it going to take? I mean, that need to fulfill real-time insights is critical across every industry but have you seen anything in the last couple years that's been more leading edge, like e-commerce or retail for example? I'm just curious. >> Girish you want to take that one or? >> Yeah, sure. So I can speak from the Uber point of view. So real-time insights has really exploded as an area, particularly as you mentioned with this just-in-time economy, right? Just to talk about it a little bit from Uber side, so some of the insights that you mentioned about when is your ride coming, and things of that nature, right? Look at it from the driver's point of view who are, now we have Uber Eats, so look at it from the restaurant manager's point of view, right? They also want to know how is their business coming? How many customer orders are coming for instance? what is the conversion rate? And so forth, right? And today these are all insights that are powered by a system which has a Presto as an front-end interface at Uber. And these queries run like, you have like tens of thousands of queries every single second, and the queries run in like a second and so forth. So you are really talking about production systems running on top of Presto, production serving systems. So coming to other use cases like eCommerce, we definitely have seen some of that uptake happen as well, so in the broader community for instance, we have companies like Stripe, and other folks who are also using this hashtag which is very similar to us based on another open source technology called Pino, using Presto as an interface. And so we are seeing this whole open data lakehouse more from just being, you know, about interactive analytics to driving all different kinds of analytics. Having anything to do with data and insights in this space. >> Yeah, sounds like the evolution has been kind of on a rocket ship the last couple years. Steven, one more time we're out of time, but can you mention that URL where folks can go to learn more? >> Yeah, prestodb.io and that's the Presto Foundation. And you know, just want to say that we'll be sharing the use case at the Startup Showcase coming up with theCUBE. We're excited about that and really welcome everyone to join the community, it's a real vibrant, expanding community and look forward to seeing you online. >> Sounds great guys. Thank you so much for sharing with us what Presto Foundation is doing, all of the things that it is catalyzing, great stuff, we look forward to hearing that customer use case, thanks for your time. >> Thank you. >> Thanks Lisa, thank you. >> Thanks everyone. >> For Steven and Girish, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching theCUBE the leader in live tech coverage. (bright music)

Published Date : Mar 24 2022

SUMMARY :

and Girish Baliga Presto in the next few minutes or so, And that lets you have that is able to connect to so that the audience gets and that's the type of things that we do So that is on the reliability front, and some of the business benefits. and then start to run with So, and the foundation is a great place and it's open to everyone. in the number of users as we've been and having more data in the cloud, I mean, that need to fulfill so some of the insights that you mentioned Yeah, sounds like the evolution and look forward to seeing you online. all of the things that it For Steven and Girish, I'm Lisa Martin,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

StevenPERSON

0.99+

StevePERSON

0.99+

GirishPERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

Steven MihPERSON

0.99+

Presto FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

AhanaORGANIZATION

0.99+

Linux FoundationORGANIZATION

0.99+

CNCFORGANIZATION

0.99+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

two guestsQUANTITY

0.99+

HPEORGANIZATION

0.99+

PrestoORGANIZATION

0.99+

second setQUANTITY

0.99+

both setsQUANTITY

0.99+

over three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

AhanaPERSON

0.98+

KubernetesORGANIZATION

0.98+

SparkTITLE

0.97+

Girish BaligaPERSON

0.97+

about half a millionQUANTITY

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

over a dozen membersQUANTITY

0.96+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

PrestoTITLE

0.96+

SQLTITLE

0.95+

singleQUANTITY

0.95+

thousands of machinesQUANTITY

0.94+

every single secondQUANTITY

0.93+

Girish Baliga Presto FoundationORGANIZATION

0.92+

prestodb.ioOTHER

0.91+

last couple yearsDATE

0.9+

4KOTHER

0.89+

Startup ShowcaseEVENT

0.88+

one vendorQUANTITY

0.88+

G37 Paul Duffy


 

(bright upbeat music) >> Okay, welcome back everyone to the live CUBE coverage here in Las Vegas for in-person AWS re:Invent 2021. I'm John Furrier host of theCUBE two sets, live wall to wall coverage, all scopes of the hybrid events. Well, great stuff online. That was too much information to consume, but ultimately as usual, great show of new innovation for startups and for large enterprises. We've got a great guest, Paul Duffy head of startups Solutions Architecture for North America for Amazon Web Services. Paul, thanks for coming on. Appreciate it. >> Hi John, good to be here. >> So we saw you last night, we were chatting kind of about the show in general, but also about start ups. Everyone knows I'm a big startup fan and big founder myself, and we talk, I'm pro startups, everyone loves startups. Amazon, the first real customers were developers doing startups. And we know the big unicorns out there now all started on AWS. So Amazon was like a dream for the startup because before Amazon, you had to provision the server, you put in the Colo, you need a system administrator, welcome to EC2. Goodness is there, the rest is history. >> Yeah. >> The legacy and the startups is pretty deep. >> Yeah, you made the right point. I've done it myself. I co-founded a startup in about 2007, 2008. And before we even knew whether we had any kind of product market fit, we were racking the servers and doing all that kind of stuff. So yeah, completely changed it. >> And it's hard too with the new technology now finding someone to actually, I remember when we stood with our first Hadoop and we ran a solar search engine. I couldn't even find anyone to manage it. Because if you knew Hadoop back then, you were working at Facebook or Hyperscaler. So you guys have all this technology coming out, so provisioning and doing the heavy lifting for start is a huge win. That's kind of known, everyone knows that. So that's cool. What are you guys doing now because now you've got large enterprises trying to beat like startups. You got startups coming in with huge white spaces out there in the market. Jerry Chen from Greylock, and it was only yesterday we talked extensively about the net new opportunities in the Cloud that are out there. And now you see companies like Goldman Sachs have super cloud. So there's tons of growth. >> Paul: Yeah. >> Take us through the white space. How do you guys see startups taking advantage of AWS to a whole another level. >> And I think it's very interesting when you look at how things have changed in those kind of 15 years. The old world's horrible, you had to do all this provisioning. And then with AWS, Adam Szalecki was talking in his keynote on the first day of the event where people used to think it was just good for startups. Now for startups, it was this kind of obvious thing because they didn't have any legacy, they didn't have any data centers, they didn't have necessarily a large team and be able to do this thing with no commitment. Spin up a server with an API call was really the revolutionary thing. In that time, 15 years later, startups still have the same kind of urgency. They're constrained by time, they're constrained by money, they're constrained by the engineering talent they have. When you hear some of the announcements this week, or you look what is kind of the building blocks available to those startups. That I think is where it's become revolutionary. So you take a startup in 2011, 2012, and they were trying to build something maybe they were trying to do image recognition on forms for example, and they could build that. But they had to build the whole thing in the cloud. We had infrastructure, we had database stuff, but they would have to do all of the kind of the stuff on top of that. Now you look at some of the kind of the AIML services we have things like Textract, and they could just take that service off the shelf. We've got one startup in Canada called Chisel AI. They're trying to disrupt the insurance industry, and they could just use these services like text extracts to just accelerate them getting into that product market fit instead of having to do this undifferentiated (indistinct). >> Paul, we talk about, I remember back in the day when Web Services and service oriented architecture, building blocks, decoupling APIs, all that's now so real and so excellent, but you brought up a great point, Glue layers had to be built. Now you have with the scale of Amazon Web Services, things we're learning from other companies. It reminds me of the open source vibe where you stand on the shoulders of others to get success. And there's a lot of new things coming out that startups don't have to do because startup before then did. This is like a new, cool thing. It's a whole nother level. >> Yeah, and I think it's a real standing on the shoulders of giants kind of thing. And if you just unpick, like in Verna's announcement this morning, his key to this one, he was talking about the Amplify Studio kind of stuff. And if you think about the before and after for that, front-end developers have had to do this stuff for a long period of time. And in the before version, they would have to do all that kind of integration work, which isn't really what they want to spend that time doing. And now they've kind of got that headstart. Andy Jassy famously would say, when he talked about building AWS, that there is no compression algorithm for experience. I like to kind of misuse that phrase for what we try to do for startups is provide these compression algorithms. So instead of having say, hire a larger engineering team to just do this kind of crafty stuff, they can just take the thing and kind of get from naught to 60 (indistinct). >> Gives some examples today of where this is playing out in real time. What kinds of new compression algorithms can startups leverage that they couldn't get before what's new that's available? >> I think you see it across all parts of the stack. I mean, you could just take it out of a database thing, like in the old days, if you wanted to start, and you had the dream that every startup has, of getting to kind of hyper scale where things bursting that seems is the problem. If you wanted to do that in the database layer back in the day, you would probably have to provision most of that database stuff yourself. And then when you get to some kind of limiting factor, you've got to do that work where all you're really wanting to do is try and add more features to your application. Or whether you've got services like Aurora where that will do all of that kind of scaling from a storage point of view. And it gives that startup the way to stand on the shoulders of giants, all the same kind of thing. You want to do some kind of identity, say you're doing a kind of a dog walking marketplace or something like that. So one of the things that you need to do for the kind of the payments thing is some kind of identity verification. In the old days, you would have to have gone pulled all those premises together to do the stuff that would look at people's ID and so on. Now, people can take things like Textracts for example, to look at those forms and do that kind of stuff. And you can kind of pick that story in all of these different stream lines whether it's compute stuff, whether it's database, whether it's high-level AIML stuff, whether it's stuff like amplify, which just massively compresses that timeframe for the startup. >> So, first of all, I'm totally loving this 'cause this is just an example of how evolution works. But if I'm a startup, one of the big things I would think about, and you're a founder, you know this, opportunity recognition is one thing, opportunity capture is another. So moving fast is what nimble startups do. Maybe there's a little bit of technical debt. There maybe a little bit of model debt, but they can get beach head quickly. Startups can move fast, that's the benefit. So where do I learn if I'm a startup founder about where all these pieces are? Is there a place that you guys are providing? Is there use cases where founders can just come in and get the best of the best composable cloud? How do I stand up something quickly to get going that I could regain and refactor later, but not take on too much technical debt or just actually have new building blocks. Where are all these tools? >> I'm really glad you asked that one. So, I mean, first startups is the core of what everyone in my team does. And most of the people we hire, well, they all have a passion for startups. Some have been former founders, some have been former CTOs, some have come to the passion from a different kind of thing. And they understand the needs of startups. And when you started to talk about technical debt, one of the balances that startups have always got to get right, is you're not building for 10 years down the line. You're building to get yourself often to the next milestone to get the next set of customers, for example. And so we're not trying to do the sort of the perfect anonymity of good things. >> I (indistinct) conception of startups. You don't need that, you just got to get the marketplace. >> Yeah, and how we try to do that is we've got a program called Activate and Activate gives startup founders either things like AWS credits up to a hundred thousand dollars in credits. It gives them other technical capabilities as well. So we have a part of the console, the management console called the Activate Console people can go there. And again, if you're trying to build a backend API, there is something that is built on AWS capability to be launched recently that basically says here's some templatized stuff for you to go from kind of naught to 60 and that kind of thing. So you don't have to spend time searching the web. And for us, we're taking that because we've been there before with a bunch of other startups, so we're trying to help. >> Okay, so how do you guys, I mean, a zillion startups, I mean, you and I could be in a coffee shop somewhere, hey, let's do a startup. Do I get access, does everyone gets access to this program that you have? Or is it an elite thing? Is there a criteria? Is it just, you guys are just out there fostering and evangelizing brilliant tools. Is there a program? How do you guys- >> It's a program. >> How do you guys vet startup's, is there? >> It's a program. It has different levels in terms of benefits. So at the core of it it's open to anybody. So if you were a bootstrap startup tomorrow, or today, you can go to the Activate website and you can sign up for that self-starting tier. What we also do is we have an extensive set of connections with the community, so T1 accelerators and incubators, venture capital firms, the kind of places where startups are going to build and via the relationships with those folks. If you're in one, if you've kind of got investment from a top tier VC firm for example, you may be eligible for a hundred thousand dollars of credit. So some of it depends on where the stock is up, but the overall program is open to all. And a chunk of the stuff we talked about like the guidance that's there for everybody. >> It's free, that's free and that's cool. That's good learning, so yeah. And then they get the free training. What's the coolest thing that you're doing right now that startups should know about around obviously the passionate start ups. I know for a fact at 80%, I can say that I've heard Andy and Adam both say that it's not just enterprising, well, they still love the startups. That's their bread and butter too. >> Yeah, well, (indistinct) I think it's amazing that someone, we were talking about the keynote you see some of these large customers in Adam's keynote to people like United Airlines, very, very large successful enterprise. And if you just look around this show, there's a lot of startups just on this expert floor that we are now. And when I look at these announcements, to me, the thing that just gets me excited and keeps me staying doing this job is all of these little capabilities make it in the environment right now with a good funding environment and all of these technical building blocks that instead of having to take a few, your basic compute and storage, once you have all of these higher and higher levels things, you know the serverless stuff that was announced in Adam's keynotes early, which is just making it easy. Because if you're a founder, you have an idea, you know the thing that you want to disrupt. And we're letting people do that in different ways. I'll pick one start up that I find really exciting to talk to. It's called Study. It's run by a guy called Zack Kansa. And he started that start up relatively recently. Now, if you started 15 years ago, you were going to use EC2 instances building on the cloud, but you were still using compute instances. Zack is really opinionated and a kind of a technology visionary in this sense that he takes this serverless approach. And when you talk to him about how he's building, it's almost this attitude of, if I've had to spin up a server, I've kind of failed in some way, or it's not the right kind of thing. Why would we do that? Because we can build with these completely different kinds of architectures. What was revolutionary 15 years ago, and it's like, okay, you can launch it and serve with an API, and you're going to pay by the hour. But now when you look at how Zack's building, you're not even launching a server and you're paying by the millions. >> So this is a huge history lesson slash important point. Back 15 years ago, you had your alternative to Amazon was provisioning, which is expensive, time consuming, lagging, and probably causes people to give up, frankly. Now you get that in the cloud either you're on your own custom domain. I remember EC2 before they had custom domains. It was so early. But now it's about infrastructures code. Okay, so again, evolution, great time to market, buy what you need in the cloud. And Adam talked about that. Now it's true infrastructure is code. So the smart savvy architects are saying, Hey, I'm just going to program. If I'm spinning up servers, that means that's a low level primitive that should be automated. >> Right. >> That's the new mindset. >> Yeah, that's why the fun thing about being in this industry is in just in the time that I've worked at AWS, since about 2011, this stuff has changed so much. And what was state of the art then? And if you take, it's funny, when you look at some of the startups that have grown with AWS, like whether it's Airbnb, Stripe, Slack and so on. If you look at how they built in 2011, because sometimes new startups will say, oh, we want to go and talk to this kind of unicorn and see how they built. And if you actually talked to the unicorn, some of them would say, we wouldn't build it this way anymore. We would do the kind of stuff that Zack and the folks studied are doing right now, because it's totally different (indistinct). >> And the one thing that's consistent from then to now is only one thing, it has nothing to do with the tech, it's speed. Remember rails front end with some backend Mongo, you're up on EC2, you've got an app, in a week, hackathon. Weekend- >> I'm not tying that time thing, that just goes, it gets smaller and smaller. Like the amplify thing that Verna was talking about this morning. You could've gone back 15 years, it's like, okay, this is how much work the developer would have to do. You could go back a couple of years and it's like, they still have this much work to do. And now this morning, it's like, they've just accelerated them to that kind of thing. >> We'll end on giving Jerry Chan a plug in our chat yesterday. We put the playbook out there for startups. You got to raise your focus on the beach head and solve the problem you got in front of you, and then sequence two adjacent positions, refactor in the cloud. Take that approach. You don't have to boil the ocean over right away. You get in the market, get in and get automating kind of the new playbook. It's just, make everything work for you. Not use the modern. >> Yeah, and the thing for me, that one line, I can't remember it was Paul Gray, or somehow that I stole it from, but he's just encouraging these startups to be appropriately lazy. Like let us do the hard work. Let us do the undifferentiated heavy lifting so people can come up with these super cool ideas. >> Yeah, just plugging the talent, plugging the developer. You got a modern application. Paul, thank you for coming on theCUBE, I appreciate it. >> Thank you. >> Head of Startup Solution Architecture North America, Amazon Web Services is going to continue to birth more startups that will be unicorns and decacorns now. Don't forget the decacorns. Okay, we're here at theCUBE bringing you all the action. I'm John Furrier, theCUBE. You're watching the Leader in Global Tech Coverage. We'll be right back. (bright upbeat music)

Published Date : Dec 2 2021

SUMMARY :

all scopes of the hybrid events. So we saw you last night, The legacy and the and doing all that kind of stuff. And now you see companies How do you guys see startups all of the kind of the stuff that startups don't have to do And if you just unpick, can startups leverage that So one of the things that you need to do and get the best of the And most of the people we hire, you just got to get the marketplace. So you don't have to spend to this program that you have? So at the core of it it's open to anybody. What's the coolest thing And if you just look around this show, Now you get that in the cloud And if you actually talked to the unicorn, And the one thing that's Like the amplify thing that Verna kind of the new playbook. Yeah, and the thing for me, Yeah, just plugging the bringing you all the action.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

Andy JassyPERSON

0.99+

2011DATE

0.99+

Paul DuffyPERSON

0.99+

CanadaLOCATION

0.99+

AndyPERSON

0.99+

Jerry ChanPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Adam SzaleckiPERSON

0.99+

PaulPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jerry ChenPERSON

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

Goldman SachsORGANIZATION

0.99+

United AirlinesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

Paul GrayPERSON

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

millionsQUANTITY

0.99+

2008DATE

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

2012DATE

0.99+

ZackPERSON

0.99+

HyperscalerORGANIZATION

0.98+

tomorrowDATE

0.98+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

EC2TITLE

0.98+

2007DATE

0.98+

15 years laterDATE

0.98+

two setsQUANTITY

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.97+

15 years agoDATE

0.97+

first dayQUANTITY

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

HadoopTITLE

0.97+

60QUANTITY

0.97+

Solutions ArchitectureORGANIZATION

0.96+

this morningDATE

0.96+

bothQUANTITY

0.96+

hundred thousand dollarsQUANTITY

0.95+

last nightDATE

0.95+

AirbnbORGANIZATION

0.95+

two adjacent positionsQUANTITY

0.94+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.93+

GreylockORGANIZATION

0.93+

one thingQUANTITY

0.93+

ColoLOCATION

0.93+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.91+

T1ORGANIZATION

0.9+

one lineQUANTITY

0.88+

up to a hundred thousand dollarsQUANTITY

0.87+

MongoORGANIZATION

0.86+

Chisel AIORGANIZATION

0.85+

Anshu Sharma, Skyflow | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

(bright upbeat music) >> Hello everyone. And we're back at AWS Re:Invent. You're watching theCUBE and we're here, day two. Actually we started Monday night and we got wall-to-wall coverage. We going all the way through Thursday, myself. I'm Dave Volante with the co-host, David Nicholson. Lisa Martin is also here. Of course, John Furrier. Partners, technologists, customers, the whole ecosystem. It's good to be back in the live event. Of course we have hybrid event as well a lot of people watching online. Anshu Sharma is here. He is the co-founder and CEO of Skyflow, new type of privacy company, really interested in this topic. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you, thanks for bringing me here. >> It's timely, you know. Privacy, security, they're kind of two sides of the same coin. >> Yes. >> Why did you found Skyflow? >> Well, the idea for Skyflow really comes from my background in some ways. I spent my first nine years at Oracle, six years at Salesforce. And whether we were building databases or CRM products, customers would come to us and say, "Hey, you know, I have this very different type of data. It's things like social security numbers, frequent flyer card numbers, card numbers. You know, can you secure it better? Can you help me manage things like GDPR?" And to be honest, there was never a clear answer. There's a lot of technology solutions out there that do one thing at a time, you can walk around the booths here, there's like a hundred companies. And if you use all those hundred things correctly, maybe you could go tell your board that maybe a social security number is not going to be lost anymore. And I was like, "You know, we've simplified everything else. Why is it so hard to protect my social security number? It should be easy. It should be as easy as using Stripe or Twilio." And this idea just never went away and kept coming back till a few years ago, we learned about the Facebook privacy challenges, the Equifax challenges. And I was like, boy, it's the time. It's time to go do it now. >> You started the company in 2019. Right? >> Yes. >> I mean, your timing was pretty good, right? So what are the big sort of Uber trends that you're seeing? Obviously GDPR, the California Consumer Privacy Act. I heard this morning. Did you hear this? That like, if you post a picture on social media now without somebody's permission, you're now violating their privacy. It's like, you can see the smiles on Anshu's face. >> Its like every week, we're like every week, there's a new story that could be like, well, Skyflow. The new story is the question, the answer is Skyflow. But honestly I think what's happened is, the issue is put very simple. You know all we're trying to do is protect people's social security numbers, phone numbers, credit card numbers, things we hold dear. At the same time, it's complex. Like what does it mean to protect your social security number let's say? Does that mean I don't get to use it for filing your taxes? Well, I need your credit card number to process a payment. And we were like, this is just too complicated. Why, how do companies like Apple do it? How do companies like Netflix manage not have as many breaches as my hotel that barely has any data. And the answer is those companies actually have evolved to a completely different architecture, the zero trust data architecture. And that was our inspiration for starting this company. >> Yeah. I mean. How many times have you been asked to give your social security number? And you're like, why? why do you want it? What are you going to do with it? How do you protect it? And they go, "I don't know." >> You know, what's even, my favorite is like, you give your social security number to say TurboTax, how many days of the year do they need to use it? One. How many days of the year do they have it? And the thing is, it's a liability for those CTOs too. >> Yeah right. >> The CTO of Walgreens, the CTO of Intuit. They don't really want that social security number just so they can process your card once a year, or your social security number once a year. It's almost like we're forcing them to hold onto data. And then they have to bear the burden of having these stories. Like, you know, everybody wants to prevent a New York Times story that says, what Robin Hood had a breach, Twitter had a breach. >> So walk us through how Skyflow would address something like that. So take the, you know, take the make a generic version of TurboTax, social security members. There they are right now, they're sitting in a database somewhere. Hopefully there's some security wrapped around it in some way or another. What would you advise a customer like that to do? And what are you actually doing for them? >> So, look, it's very simple. You are not going to put your username passwords in a generic database. You're going to use something like OD Zero or Octa to do it. We're living in a world where we have polyglot data stores. Like there's a key value store. There's a time series database. There is a search database like Elastic. There's a log database like Splunk. But PII data, Somehow we think just fine. If it's in a hundred places and our answer is that we should do the same thing that companies like Apple, Netflix, Google, everybody, does. They take this data. They completely isolate it from the databases. And it gets stored in a custom data store in our case, that would be Skyflow. And essentially we'd give you encrypted tokens back and you can use these encrypted tokens that look like fake social security number. It's called a Format Preserving Encryption. So if you think about all the breakthroughs we've had in homomorphic encryption, on secure elements, like the way your phone works, the credit card number is stored in a secure element. So it's the same idea. There's a secure part of your data stack, which is Skyflow. That basically keeps the data always protected. And because we can compute and search on encrypted data, this is important, everybody can encrypt data at rest. Skyflow is the first company that's come out and said, "Look, you can keep your phone number and social security number, encrypted while I can run an aggregation query." So I can tell you what's the balance of your customer's account balance. And i can run that query without decrypting, a single row of data. The only other company I know that can do that internally is a certain Cupertino based company. >> So think about it. Anybody can walk something up to a certain degree, but allowing frictionless access at the same time. >> While it's encrypted. So how do you make that? Are you, is a strategy to make that a horizontal service? That I can put into my data protection service or my E-commerce service or whatever. >> It's a cloud-based service that runs on AWS and other clouds. We basically given instance just like, you'll get an instance of a post-grad store or you get an API handled to OD Zero. You basically instantiate Skyflow of what gets created. It can be in your AWS environment, dedicated VPC. So it's private to you and then you have a handle and then basically you just start using it. >> So how, how do you, what's the secret sauce? How do you do that? >> The secret source. Well, now that we filed the patents on it, I can reveal the secret sauce. So the holy grail of encryption right now, if you go talk to people at a leading company, is there's something called Fully Homomorphic Encryption. That's fundamentally the foundation on which things like Bitcoin are built actually. But the hard part about Fully Homomorphic Encryption is it works. You can actually do mathematical computations on it without decrypting the data, but it's about a million times slower. >> Yes slower, right. >> So nobody uses it. My insight was that we don't need to do multiplications and additions on phone numbers. You never take my phone number and divide by your social security number. (Dave laughing) These numbers are not numbers, they are data structures. So our insight was if you treat them as specialized data structures, we're all talking about basically about 80 different types of data across the globe. Every human being has an ID, date of birth, height, color of eyes. There's not that many fields. What we can do then is create specialized encryption schemes for each data type. We call this polymorphic data encryption. Poly means multiple. As a result of that, we can actually store the data encrypted and build indexes on it. Since we can index interpret data, it's kind of like, imagine you can run real-time queries on data that's encrypted. Every other data store, When you encrypt the data, it becomes invisible to database. And that's why we had to build this as a full stacked service. Just like the Snowflake guys had to start with the foundation of storage, rethink indexing, and build Snowflake. We did the same thing, except we built it for encrypted indexes Whereas they built it for encrypted, for regular data stores. >> So thinking, if you think about today's tech stack, it's evolving, right? The data protection and security are coming together. Where does this fit? Is it sort of now becoming a fundamental part of the-- >> We think every leading company, whether you're building a new brokerage application or you are the largest bank in the world, and we're talking to some of them right now. They're all going to have an internal service called a PII wall. This wall just like Apple and Google have their own internal walls. You're going to have a wall service in your service oriented architecture, essentially. And it's going to basically be the API. Every other application and database in your company is not going to store my social security number. The SSNs don't belong in 600 databases at a leading bank. They don't belong inside your customer support system. Think about what happened with Robinhood two weeks ago, right? Someone tricked one call center guy into giving the keys up, which is fine happens. But why did the call center guy have access to like a million email addresses? He's never used going to use that. So we think if you isolate the PII, every leading company is going to end up with a PII Wall, as part of their core architecture. Just like today, we have an Alt API, you have a Search API, you have a Logging API, you're going to have a PII API. And that's going to be part of your modern data stack. >> So okay. So this is definitely not a bolt on, right? It's going to be a fundamental company, just like security is, just like backup is. It's now, you got to have it. It's-- >> Yes. I mean, if you think about it, it just logically makes sense. Like you should be isolating this data. You don't keep your money and gold around at home. You put it either in a locker or a bank. I think the same applies for PII. We just haven't done it because companies would pay off a fine for $10,000 or a million dollars. And. >> Yeah. So you've recently raised $45 million to expand your efforts. Obviously that means that people are looking at this and saying there's opportunity, right? What does that look like when you think of growth, where during your go to market strategy at first you're convincing people that it's a good idea to do it. Do you think or hope for, hope one day that there's an inflection point where it's not that people are thinking, you know, let's do this because it's a good idea, but people are like, I have to do this because if I don't, it's irresponsible and I'm going to be penalized for not having it. It becomes something that isn't really a choice. It's something where you just do it. >> So, you know, when we were starting the company, we didn't even have a word to explain what we were trying to do. We would say things like what if there was a cloud service for XYZ. And, but over the last one year, I don't want to take credit for creating this market, but this market has been created in the last year and a half. And you know, we get tons of people, including some of the largest institutions emailing us, saying, "I'm looking to build a PII wall, API service inside my company. Can you tell me why your product meets that need?" And I thought that would take us three to five years to get there. And, you know, we've ended up creating a category, basically just like other companies have. And I think, you know, you don't get, I believe in market permission. You don't get to create a category. The market gives somebody the permission to create a category. Saying, "Look, this makes sense. Something like this should emerge." And if you're there at the right time, like you said. >> Yep. >> You get to take the opportunity. >> So where are you at as a company say for some, some capital is great. When do you scale? >> We're scaling now? So we just doubled our headcount in the last nine to 10 months. We're now 75 people. We think we'll be about 150 to 200 people in the next year. We are hiring across all regions. We just hired a head of Asia pack from segment.com. We just hired our first, you know, lead on international expansion. And in the US, we have an office in Palo Alto. We have an office in Bangalore. We just announced a data residency solution for Europe, data residency solution for India and emerging markets. Because data residency is another one of those things that's just emerging right now. And irrespective of whether you believe in security and privacy. Data residency is one of those things that you are mandated to implement. >> And where are you hiring? Is it combination to go to market? Tell me about your go to market. >> The go to market. We are direct sales organization, but we work with partners. So we haven't announced some of these partnerships, but you're working with some of the companies here who either are large database companies, large security companies. We think there is a win-win relationship between us and some of the partner. >> You're a partner model, partner channel model. >> So, direct sales but partner assisted. >> Yeah. Right. All right. We got to go. Hey, awesome story. Congratulations. Best of luck. >> Very interesting. >> Love to have you back and track the progress. >> Thank you, thank you so much. >> Okay. Thank you for watching theCUBE, the leader in and high-tech coverage. We're at Re-Invent 2021. Be right back (upbeat music)

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

We going all the way It's timely, you know. And if you use all those You started the company in 2019. It's like, you can see the And the answer is those to give your social security number? you give your social security And then they have to bear the burden And what are you actually doing for them? "Look, you can keep your phone number access at the same time. So how do you make that? So it's private to you if you go talk to people So our insight was if you treat them So thinking, if you think So we think if you isolate the PII, It's now, you got to have it. Like you should be isolating this data. It's something where you just do it. And I think, you know, you don't get, So where are you at as And in the US, we have And where are you hiring? The go to market. You're a partner model, We got to go. Love to have you back the leader in and high-tech coverage.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
David NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Anshu SharmaPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VolantePERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

BangaloreLOCATION

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

$45 millionQUANTITY

0.99+

$10,000QUANTITY

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Monday nightDATE

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

six yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

ThursdayDATE

0.99+

CupertinoLOCATION

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

600 databasesQUANTITY

0.99+

WalgreensORGANIZATION

0.99+

first nine yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

75 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

California Consumer Privacy ActTITLE

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

two sidesQUANTITY

0.99+

once a yearQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

two weeks agoDATE

0.99+

IntuitORGANIZATION

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

Robin HoodPERSON

0.98+

SkyflowORGANIZATION

0.98+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.98+

GDPRTITLE

0.98+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.98+

SalesforceORGANIZATION

0.98+

200 peopleQUANTITY

0.98+

each dataQUANTITY

0.98+

EquifaxORGANIZATION

0.98+

IndiaLOCATION

0.97+

TurboTaxTITLE

0.97+

one thingQUANTITY

0.97+

a million dollarsQUANTITY

0.97+

AnshuPERSON

0.97+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.97+

10 monthsQUANTITY

0.96+

zero trustQUANTITY

0.96+

day twoQUANTITY

0.96+

SkyflowTITLE

0.96+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.95+

about a million timesQUANTITY

0.94+

hundredQUANTITY

0.93+

hundred companiesQUANTITY

0.93+

OD ZeroTITLE

0.93+

first companyQUANTITY

0.92+

tonsQUANTITY

0.92+

last one yearDATE

0.92+

TurboTaxORGANIZATION

0.92+

last year and a halfDATE

0.9+

this morningDATE

0.9+

OneQUANTITY

0.9+

single rowQUANTITY

0.9+

Fully Homomorphic EncryptionOTHER

0.88+

AsiaLOCATION

0.88+

New York TimesORGANIZATION

0.87+

about 80 different types of dataQUANTITY

0.87+

few years agoDATE

0.85+

AWS Re:InventEVENT

0.84+

PIIORGANIZATION

0.84+

SnowflakeTITLE

0.83+

SplunkORGANIZATION

0.81+

PreservingOTHER

0.8+

segment.comORGANIZATION

0.79+

Day 2 Wrap with Jerry Chen | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

(upbeat music) >> Welcome back, everyone, to theCUBE's live coverage, day one wrap-up. I'm John Furrier, with Dave Vellante. We have Jerry Chen, special guest who's been with us every year on theCUBE since inception. Certainly every AWS re:Invent, nine years straight. Jerry Chen, great to see you for our guest analyst's wrap up VC general partner, Greylock partners, good to see you. >> John, Dave, it's great to see you guys. Thanks for having me again. It wouldn't be re:Invent without the three of us sitting here and we missed last year, right, because of COVID. So we have to make up for lost time. >> John: We did a virtual one- >> Dave: we did virtual stuff= >> John: wasn't the same as in-person. >> Dave: Definitely not the same. >> Jerry: Not the same thing. So, it's good to see you guys again in person, and less than 6 feet apart. >> Cheers, yeah. >> And 7,000 people here, showing that the event's still relevant. >> Jerry: Yeah. >> Some people would kill for those numbers, it's a bad year for Amazon, down from 60,000. >> Jerry: Yeah. >> So, ecosystem's booming. Okay, let's get to it. Day one in the books, new CEO, new sheriff in town, his name's Adam Selipsky. Your take? >> Well, Adam's new, but he's old, right? Something, you know, like something new, something old, something blue, right? It's so, Adam was early Amazon, so he had that founding DNA. Left, you know, CEO of Tableau, acquired by Salesforce, came back few months ago. So I think it was a great move, because one, he's got the history and culture under Jassy, so he's definitely the Bezos Jassy tree of leadership, but yet he's been outside the bubble. Right? So he actually knows what it means to run a company not on the Amazon platform. So, I think Adam's a great choice to lead AWS for what we call it, like maybe act two, right? Act one, the first X years with Jassy, and maybe this is the second act under Adam. >> Yeah. And he's got- and he was very technical, hung around all the techies, James Hamilton, DeSantis, all the engineers, built that core primitives. Now, as they say, this cloud next gen's here, act two, it's about applications. >> Jerry: Yeah. >> Infrastructure as code is in place. Interesting area. Where's the growth come from? So, look, you know, the ecosystem has got to build these super clouds, or as you say, Castles on the Cloud, which you coined, but you brought this up years ago, that the moats and the value has to be in there somewhere. Do you want to revise that prediction now that you see what's coming from Selipsky? >> Okay, well, so let's refresh. Greylock.com/castles has worked out, like we did, but a lot of thought leadership and the two of you, have informed my thinking at Castles in the Cloud, how to compete against Amazon in the cloud. So you'd argue act one, the startup phase, the first, you know, X years at Amazon was from 2008 to, you know, 2021, the first X years, building the platform, digging the moats. Right? So what did you have? You have castle the platform business, economies of scale, which means decreasing marginal costs and natural network effects. So once the moat's in place and you had huge market share, what do you for act two, right? Now the moats are in place, you can start exploring the moats for I think, Adam talked about in your article, horizontal and verticals, right? Horizontal solutions up the stack, like Amazon Connect, CRM solutions, right? Horizontal apps, maybe the app layer, and verticals, industrials, financials, healthcare, et cetera. So, I think Jassy did a foundation of the castle and now we're seeing, you know, what Adam and his generation would do for act two. >> So he's, so there's almost like an act one A, because if you take the four hyperscalers, they're about, maybe do 120 billion this year, out of, I don't know, pick a number, it's many hundreds of billions, at least in infrastructure. >> Jerry: Correct. >> And those four hyperscalers growing at 35% collectively, right? So there's some growth there, but I feel like there's got to be deeper business integration, right? It's not just about IT transformation, it's about deeper- So that's maybe where this Connect like stuff comes, but are there enough of those? You know, I didn't, I haven't, I didn't hear a lot of that this morning. I heard a little bit, ML- >> Jerry: Sure. >> AI into Connect, but where's the next Connect, right? They've got to do dozens of those in order to go deeper. >> Either, Dave, dozens of those Connects or more of those premise, so the ML announcement was today. So you look at what Twilio did by buying Segment, right? Deconstruct a CRM to compete against Adam Selipsky's old acquire of Salesforce.com. They bought Segment, so Twilio now has communicates, like texting, messaging, email, but all the data come from Segment. >> Dave: With consumption-based pricing. >> With consumption-based pricing. So, right? So that's an example of kind of what the second act of cloud looks like. It may not look like full SaaS apps like Salesforce.com, but these primitives, both horizontally vertically, because again, what does Amazon have as an asset that other guys don't? Install based developers. Developers aren't going to necessarily build or consume SaaS apps, but they're going to consume things like these API's and primitives. And so you look around, what's cloud act two look like? It may not be VM's or containers. It may be API's like Stripe and Billing, Twilio messaging, right? Concepts like that. So, we'll see what the next act at cloud looks like. And they announced a bunch of stuff today, serverless for the data analytics, right? So serverless is this move towards not consuming raw compute and storage, but APIs. >> What about competition? Microsoft is nipping at the heels of AWS. >> Dave: John put them out of business earlier today. [John and Dave Laugh] >> No, I said, quote, I'll just- let me rephrase. I said, if Amazon goes unchecked- >> Jerry: Sure. >> They'll annihilate Microsoft's ecosystem. Because if you're an ISV, why wouldn't you want to run on the best platform? >> Jerry: Sure. >> Speeds and feeds matter when you have these shifts of software development. >> Jerry: You want them both. >> So, you know, I mean, you thought about the 80's, if you were at database, you wanted the best processor. So I think this Annapurna vertical integrated stacks are interesting because if my app runs better and I have a platform, prefabricated or purpose-built platform, to be there for me, I'm going to build a great SaaS app. If it runs faster and it cost less, I'm going to flop to Amazon. That's just, that's my prediction. >> So I think better changes, right? And so I think if you're Amazon, you say cheaper, better, faster, and they're investing in chips, proprietary silicon to run better, faster, their machine learning training chips, but if you're Azure or Google, you got to redefine what better is. And as a startup investor, we're always trying to do category definition, right? Like here's a category by spin. So now, if you're Azure or Google, there are things you can say that are better, and Google argued their chips, their TensorFlow, are better. Azure say our regions, our security, our enterprise readiness is better. And so all of a sudden, the criteria "what's better" changes. So from faster and cheaper to maybe better compliance, better visibility, better manageability, different colors, I don't know, right? You have to change the game , because if you play the same game on Amazon's turf, to your point, John, it- it's game over because they have economies of scale. But I think Azure and Google and other clouds, the superclouds, or subclouds are changing the game, what it means to compete. And so I think what's going on, just two more seconds, from decentralized cloud, being Web 3 and crypto, that's a whole 'nother can of worms, to Edge compute, what Cloudflare are doing with R2 and storage, they're trying to change the name of the game. >> Well, that's right. If you go frontal against Amazon, you're got to get decimated. You got to move the goalposts for better. And I think that's a good way to look at it, Dave. What does better mean? So that's the question that's on the table. What does that look like? And I think that's an unknown, that's coming. Okay, back to the start-ups. Category definition. That's an awesome term. That to me is a key thing. How do you look at what a category is on your sub- on your Castles of the Cloud, you brought up how many categories of- >> Jerry: 33 markets and a bunch of submarkets, yeah. >> Yeah. Explain that concept. >> So, we did Castle in the Clouds where my team looked at all the services offered at Azure, Google, and Amazon. We downloaded the services and recategorized them to like, 30 plus markets and a bunch of submarkets. Because, the reason why is apples to apples, you know, Amazon, Google, Azure all have databases, but they might call them different things. And so I think first things first is, let's give developers and customers kind of apples to apples comparisons. So I think those are known markets. The key in investing in the cloud, or investing in general, is you're either investing in budget replacement, replacing a known market, cheaper, better database, to your point, or a net new market, right? Which is always tricky. So I think the biggest threat to a lot of the startups and incumbents, the biggest threat by startups and incumbents, is either one, do something cheaper, better in a current market, or find a net new market that they haven't thought about yet. And if you can win that net new market before the rest, then that's unbelievable. We call it the, you know, the blue ocean strategy, >> Dave: Is that essentially what Snowflake has done, started with cheaper, better, and now they're building the data cloud? >> Jerry: I think there's- it's evolution, correct. So they said cheaper, better. And the Castle in the Cloud, we talked about, they actually built deep IP. So they went a known category, data warehouses, right? You had Teradata, Redshift, Snowflake cheaper, better, faster. And now let's say, okay, once you have the customers, let's change the name of the game and create a data cloud. And it's TBD whether or not Snowflake can win data cloud. Like we talked about Rockset, one of my investments that's actually move the goalpost saying, oh, data cloud is nice, but real time data is where it's at, and Snowflake and those guys can't play in real time. >> Dave: No, they're not in a position to play in real time data. >> Jerry: Right. >> Dave: I mean, that's right. >> So again, so that's an example of a startup moving the goalpost on what previously was a startup that moved the goalpost on an incumbent. >> Dave: And when you think about Edge, it's going to be real-time AI inferencing at the Edge, and you're right, Snowflake's not set up well at all for that. >> John: So competition wise, how do the people compete? Because this is what Databricks did the same exact thing. I have Ali on the record going back years, "Well, we love Amazon. We're only on Amazon." Now he's talking multicloud. >> So, you know, once you get there, you kind of change your tune cause you've got some scale, but then you got new potential entrants coming in, like Rockset. >> Jerry: Correct. >> So. >> Dave: But then, and if you add up the market caps of just those two companies, Databricks and Snowflake, it's much larger than the database market. So this, we're defining new markets now. >> Jerry: I think there's market cap, especially Snowflake that's in the public market, Databricks is still private, is optimism that there's a second or third act in the database space left to be unlocked. And you look at what's going on in that space, these real-time analytics or real-time apps, for sure there's optimism there. But, but to John's point, you're right, like you earn the right to play the next act, but it's tricky because startups disrupt incumbents and become incumbents, and they're also victims their own success, right? So you're- there's technical debt, there's also business model debt. So you're victims of your own business model, victims of your own success. And so what got you here may not get you to the next phase. And so I think for Amazon, that's a question. For Databricks and Snowflake, that's a question, is what got them here? Can they play to the next act? And look, Apple did it, multiple acts. >> John: Well, I mean, I think I- [Crosstalk] >> John: I think it's whether you take shortcuts or not, if you have debt, you make it a little bit of a shortcut bet. >> Jerry: Yeah. >> Okay. That's cool. But ultimately what you're getting at here is beachhead thinking. Get a beachhead- >> Jerry: Correct. >> Get in the market, and then sequence to a different position. Classic competitive strategy, 101. That's hard to do because you want to win the beachhead- >> I know. >> John: And take a little technical debt and business model debt, cheat a little bit, and then, is it not fortified yet? So beachhead to expansion is the question. >> Jerry: That's every board meeting, John and Dave, that we're in, right? It's called you need a narrow enough wedge to land. And it is like, I don't want the tip of the spear, I want the poison on the tip of a spear, right? [Dave and John Laugh] >> You want, especially in this cloud market, a super focused wedge to land. And the problem is, as a founder, as investor, you're always thinking about the global max, right? Like the ultimate platform winner, but you don't get the right to play the early- the late innings if you don't make it out of the early innings. And so narrow beachhead, sharp wedge, but you got to land in a space, a place of real estate with adjacent tan, adjacent markets, right? Like Uber, black cars, taxi's, food, whatever, right? Snowflake, data warehouse, data cloud. And so I think the key with all startups is you'll hit some ceiling of market size. Is there a second ramp? >> Dave: So it's- the art is when to scale and how fast to scale. >> Right. Picking when, how fast, in which- which best place, it was tough. And so, the best companies are always thinking about their second or third act while the first act's still going. >> John: Yeah. And leveraging cloud to refactor, I think that's the key to Snowflake, was they had the wedge with data warehouse, they saw the position, but refactored and in the cloud with services that they knew Teradata wouldn't use. >> Jerry: Correct. >> And they're in. From there, it's just competitive IP, crank, go to market. >> And then you have the other unnatural things. You have channel, you have installed base of customers, right? And then you start selling more stuff to the same channel, to the same customers. That's what Amazon's doing. All the incumbent's do that. Amazon's got, you know, 300 services now, launching more this week, so now they have channel distribution, right? Every credit card for all the developers, and they have installed base of customers. And so they will just launch new things and serve the customers. So the startups had to disrupt them somehow. >> Well, it's always great to chat with Jerry. Every year we discover and we riff and we identify, in real time, new stuff. We were talking about this whole vertical, horizontal scale and kind of castles early on, years ago. And now it's happened. You were right. Congratulations. That's a great thesis. There's real advantages to build on a cloud. You can get the- you can build a business there. >> Jerry: Right. >> John: That's your thesis. And by the way, these markets are changing. So if you're smart, you can actually compete. >> Jerry: I think you beat, and to Dave's earlier point, you have to adapt, right? And so what's the Darwin thing, it's not the strongest, but the most adaptable. So both- Amazon's adapt and the startups who are the most adaptable will win. >> Dave: Where are you, you guys might've talked about this, where do you stand on the cost of goods sold issue? >> Jerry: Oh, I think everything's true, right? I think you can save money at some scale to repatriate your cloud, but again, Wall Street rewards growth versus COGS, right? So I think you've got a choice between a dollar of growth versus a dollar reducing COGS, people choose growth right now. That may not always be the case, but at some point, if you're a company at some scale and the dollars of growth is slowing down, you definitely have to reduce the dollars in cost. And so you start optimizing cloud costs, and that could be going to Amazon, Azure, or Google, reducing COGS. >> Dave: Negotiate, yeah. >> John: Or, you have no visibility on new net new opportunities. So growth is about new opportunities. >> Correct. >> If you repatriating things, there's no growth. >> Jerry: It's not either, or- >> That's my opinion. >> Jerry: COGS or growth, right? But they're both valid, definitely, so you can do both. And so I don't think- it's what's your priorities, you can't do everything at once. So if I'm a founder or CEO or in this case investor, and I said, "Hey, Dave, and John, if you said I can either save you 25 basis points in gross margin, or I can increase another 10% top line this year", I'm going to say increase the top line, we'll deal with the gross margin later. Not that it's not important, but right now the early phase- >> Priorities. >> Jerry: It's growth. >> Yeah. All right, Jerry Chen, great to see you. Great to have you on, great CUBE alumni, great guest analyst. Thanks for breaking it down. CUBE coverage here in Las Vegas for re:Invent, back in person. Of course, it's a virtual event, we've got a hybrid event for Amazon, as well as theCUBE. I'm John Furrier, you're watching the leader in worldwide tech coverage. Thanks for watching. (Gentle music)

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

Jerry Chen, great to see you John, Dave, it's great to see you guys. So, it's good to see you showing that the event's still relevant. it's a bad year for Day one in the books, new so he's definitely the Bezos all the engineers, the Cloud, which you coined, the first, you know, X years at Amazon because if you take the four hyperscalers, there's got to be deeper those in order to go deeper. So you look at what Twilio And so you look around, what's Microsoft is nipping at the heels of AWS. [John and Dave Laugh] I said, if Amazon goes unchecked- run on the best platform? when you have these shifts So, you know, I mean, And so I think if you're Amazon, So that's the question Jerry: 33 markets and a apples to apples, you know, And the Castle in the Cloud, to play in real time data. of a startup moving the goalpost at the Edge, and you're right, I have Ali on the record going back years, but then you got new it's much larger than the database market. in the database space left to be unlocked. if you have debt, But ultimately what That's hard to do because you So beachhead to expansion is the question. It's called you need a And the problem is, as Dave: So it's- the art is when to scale And so, the best companies I think that's the key to Snowflake, IP, crank, go to market. So the startups had to You can get the- you can And by the way, these Jerry: I think you beat, And so you start optimizing cloud costs, John: Or, you have no visibility If you repatriating but right now the early phase- Great to have you on, great CUBE alumni,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavePERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

JerryPERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

Jerry ChenPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Adam SelipskyPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jerry ChenPERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

2008DATE

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

SnowflakeORGANIZATION

0.99+

John LaughPERSON

0.99+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.99+

120 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

DatabricksORGANIZATION

0.99+

300 servicesQUANTITY

0.99+

James HamiltonPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

10%QUANTITY

0.99+

James Watters, VMware | AWS re:Invent 2021


 

(upbeat music) >> Welcome back everyone to theCUBE's continuous coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. We're here with James Watters, CTO of Modern Applications at VMware here to talk about the big Tanzu cloud native application wave, the modernization's here. James, great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Hey John, great to have you back on. And really excited about re:Invent this year. And I've been watching your coverage of it. There's lots of exciting stuff going on in this space. >> Awesome. Well, James, you've been riding the wave of, I would call cloud 1.0, 2.0 what do you want to call it, the initial wave of cloud where the advent of replatforming is there. You know all these benefits and things are moving fast. Things are being developed. A lot of endeavors, things are tracking. Some are kicking, Kubernetes kicks in, and now the big story is over the past year and a half. Certainly the pandemic highlighted is this big wave that's hitting now, which is the real, the modernization of the enterprise, the modernization of software development. And even Amazon was saying that in one of our talks that the sovereign life cycles over it should be completely put away to bed. And that DevOps is truly here. And you add security, you got DevSecOps. So an entirely new, large scale, heavy use of data, new methodologies are all hitting right now. And if you're not on that wave your driftwood, what's your take? >> Oh, I think you're dead right, John, and you know, kind of the first 10 years of working on this for sort of proving that the microservices, the container, the declared of automation, the DevOps patterns were the future. And I think everyone's agreed now. And I think DevSecOps and the trends around app modernization are really around bringing that to scale for enterprises. So the conversations I tend to be having are, Hey, you've done a little Kubernetes. You've done some modern apps and APIs, but how do you really scale this across your enterprise? That's what I think is exciting today. And that's what we're talking about. Some of the tools we're bringing to Amazon to help people achieve faster, consumption, better scale, more security. >> You know, one of the things about VMware that's been impressive over the years is that on the wave of IT, they already had great operational install base. They did a deal with Amazon Ragu did that. I think 2016, that kind of cleared the air. They're not going to do their own cloud or they have cloud efforts kind of solidifies that. And then incomes, Kubernetes, and then you saw a completely different cloud native wave coming in with the Tanzu, the Heptio acquisition. And since then a lot's been done. Can you just take us through the Tanzu evolution because I think this is a cornerstone of what's happening right now. >> Yeah, that's a great question, John. I think that the emergence of Kubernetes as a common set of APIs that every cloud and almost every infrastructure agrees on was a huge one. And the way I talked to our clients about is that VMware is doing a couple of things in this space. The first is that we're recognizing that as an infrastructure or baking Kubernetes into every vSphere, be it vSphere on-prem, be it VMC on Amazon. You're just going to find Kubernetes is a big part of each year. So that's kind of a big step one, but it's in some ways the same way that Amazon is doing with EKS and Azure is doing with AKS, but like every infrastructure provider is bringing Kubernetes everywhere. And then that kind of unleashes this really exciting moment where you've got this global control plane that you can program to be your DevSecOps platform. And Kubernetes has this incredible model of extensibility where you can add CRDs and program, right against the Kubernetes APIs with your additional features and functions you want your DevSecOps pipeline. And so it's created this opportunity for Tanzu to kind of have then a global control plane, which we call Tanzu Mission Control to bring all of those Kubernetes running on different clouds together. And then the last thing that we'll talk about a little bit more is this Tanzu Application Platform, which is bringing a developer experience to Kubernetes. So that you're not always starting with what I like to say, like, oh, I have Git, I have Kubernetes, am I done? There's a lot more to the story than that. >> I want to get to this Tanzu Application Platform on EKS. I think that's a big story at VMware. We've seen that, but before we do that for the folks out there watching who are like, I'm now seeing this, whether they're young, new to the industry or enterprises who have replatforming or refactoring, trying to understand what is a modern application. So give us the definition in your words, what is a modern application? >> You know, John, it's a great question. And I tend to start with why and like, hey, how did we get here? And you, you and I both, I think, used to work for the bigger iron vendors back in the day. And we've seen the age of the big box Silicon Valley. I don't know, I worked at Sun just across the aisle here and basically we'd sell you a big box and then once or twice a year, you'd change the software on it. And so in a sense, like there was no chance to do user-oriented design or any of these things. Like you kind of got what you got and you hope to scale it. And then modern applications have been much more of the age of like what you might say, like Instagram or some of these modern apps that are very user-oriented and how you're changing that user interface that user design might change every week based on user feedback. And you're constantly using big data to adjust that modern app experience. And so modern apps to me are inherently iterative and inherently scalable and amenable to change. And that's where the 12 factor application manifesto was written, a blog was written a decade ago, basically saying here's how you can start to design apps to be constantly upgradable. So to me, modern apps, 12 of factors, one of them Kubernetes compatible, but the real point is that they should be flexible to be constantly iterated on maybe at least once a week at a minimum and designed and engineered to do that. And that takes them away from the old vertically scaled apps that kind of ran on 172 processors that you would infrequently update in the past. Those are what you might call like cloud apps. Is that helpful? >> Yeah, totally helpful. And by the way, those old iron vendors, they're now called the on-premise vendors and, you know, HPE, Dell and whatnot, IBM. But the thing about the cloud is, is that you have the true infrastructure as code happening. It's happened, it's happening, but faster and better and greater the goodness there. So you got DevSecOps, which is just DevOps with security. So DevSecOps is the standard now that everyone's shooting for. So what that means is I'm a developer, I just want to write code, the infrastructure got to work for me. So things like Lambda functions are all great things. So assuming that there's going to be this now programmable layer for developers just to do stuff. What is, in context to that need, what is the Tanzu Application Platform about and how does it work? >> Yeah, that's a great question, John. So once you have Kubernetes, you have this abundance of programmable, inner infrastructure resources. You can do almost anything with it, right? Like you can run machine learning workflows, you can run microservices, you can build APIs, you can import legacy apps to it, but it doesn't come out of the box with a set of application patterns and a set of controllers that are built for just, you know, modern apps. It comes with sort of a lot of flexibility and it expects you to understand a pretty broad surface area of APIs. So what we're doing is we're following in the footsteps of companies like Netflix and Uber, et cetera, all of which built kind of a developer platform on top of their Kubernetes infrastructure to say, here's your more templatized path to production. So you don't have to configure everything. You're just changing the right parts of the application. And we kind of go through three steps. The first is an application template that says, here's how to build a streaming app on Kubernetes, click here, and you'll get in your version control and we'll build a Kubernetes manifest for it. Two, is an automated containerization, which is we'll take your app and auto create a container for it so that we know it's secure and you can't make a mistake. And then three is that it will auto detect your application and build a Kubernetes deployment for it so that you can deploy it to Kubernetes in a reliable way. We're basically trying to reduce the burden on the developer from having to understand everything about Kubernetes, to really understanding their domain of the application. Does that make sense? >> Yeah, and this kind of is inline, you mentioned Netflix early on. They were one of the pioneers in inside AWS, but they had the full hyperscaler developers. They had those early hardcore devs that are like unicorns. No, you can't hire these people. They're just not many enough in the world. So the world's becoming, I won't say democratization, that's an overused word, but what we're getting to is if I get this right, you're saying you're going to eliminate the heavy lifting, the boring mundane stuff. >> Yeah, even at Netflix as is great of a developers they have, they still built kind of a microservices or an application platform on top of AWS. And I think that's true of Kubernetes today, which if you go to a Kubernetes conference, you'll often see, don't expose Kubernetes to developers. So tons of application platforms starts to really solve that question. What do you expose to a developer when they want to consume Kubernetes? >> So let's ask you, I know you do a lot of customer visits, that's one of the jobs that make you go out in the field which you like doing and working backwards on the customers has been in the DNA of VMware for years. What is the big narrative with the customers? What's their pain point? How else has the pandemics shown them projects that are working and not working, and they want to come out of it with a growth strategy. VMware is now an independent company. You guys got the platform, what are the customers doing with it? >> Well, I'll give you one example. You know, I went out and I was chatting with the retailer, had seen their online sales goes from one billion to like three billion during the pandemic. And they had been using kind of packaged shopping cart software before like a basic online store that they bought and configured. And they realized they needed to get great at modern apps to keep up with customer demand. And so I would say in general, we've seen the drive, the need for modern apps and digital transformation is just really skyrocketing and everyone's paying attention to it. And then I think they're looking for a trusted partner and they're debating, do we build it all in-house or do we turn to a partner that can help us build this above the cloud? And I think for the people that want an enterprise trusted brand, they'll have a lot of engineering talent behind it. There's been strong interest in Tanzu. And I think the big message we're trying to get out is that Tanzu can not only help you in your on-prem infrastructure, but it can also really help you on public cloud. And I think people are surprised by just how much. >> It's just in the common thread. I see that it's that point is right on is that these companies that don't digitize their business and build an application for their customer are going to get taken away by a startup. I mean, we've seen, it's so easy if you don't have an app for that, you're out of business. I mean, this is like, no, no, it's not like maybe we should do the cloud, let's get proactive. Pretty much it's critical path now for companies. So I'm sure you agree with that, but what's the progress of most of the enterprises? What percentage do you think are having this realization? >> I would say at least 70, 80%, if not more, are there now, and 10 years ago, I used to kind of have to tell stories, like, you know, some startups going to come along and they might disrupt you and people kind of give you that like, yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, I get it. And now it's sort of like, hey, someone's already in our market with an API. Tell me how to build API first apps we need to compete. And that's the difference in the strategic conversation kind of post pandemic and post, you know, the last 10 years. >> All right, final question for you 'cause this is right great thread. I've seen having a web interface it's not good enough, to your point. You got to have an application that they're engaging with, with all the modern capabilities, because the needs there, the expectation for the customers there. What new things are you seeing beyond mobile that are coming around the pike for enterprises, obviously web to mobile, mobile to what? What's next? >> I think the thing that's interesting is there is a bigger push to say more and more of what we do should be an API both internally, like, hey, other teams might want to consume some of these services as a well-formed API. I call it kind of like Stripe MB. Like you look at all these companies, they're like, Hey, stripes worth a hundred billion dollars now because they built a great API. What about us? And so I've seen a lot of industries from automotive to of course financial services and others that are saying, what if we gave our developers internally great APIs? And what if we also expose those APIs externally, we could get a lot, a more rat, fast moving business than the traditional model we might've had in the past. >> It's interesting, you know, commoditizing and automating a way infrastructure or software or capable workflows is actually normal. And if you can unify that in a way that's just better I mean, you have a lower cost structure, but the value doesn't go away, right? So I think a lot of this comes down to, beauty's in the eye of the beholder. I mean, that's how DevSecOps works. I mean, it's agile, it's faster, but you still have to achieve the value of the net is lower cost. What's your take on that? >> Well, I think you're dead right, John. And I think this is what was surprising about Stripe is it was possible before Stripe to go out as a developer and kind of pulled together a backend that did payments, but boy, it was hard. And I think that's the same thing with kind of this tons of application platform and the developer experience focus is people are realizing they can't hire enough developers. So this is the other thing that's happened during the pandemic and the great resignation, if you will, the war for talent is on. And you know, when I talked to a customer, like we might be able to help you, even 30% with your developer productivity, there's like one out of four developers. You might not have to be able to have to recruit they're all in. And so I think that API first model and the developer experience model are the same thing, which is like, it doesn't have to just be possible. It should be excellent. >> Well, great insight learning a lot. Of course, we should move to theCube API and we'll plug into your applications. We're here in the studio with our API, James. Great to have you on. Final word, what's your take this, the big story for re:Invent. If you had to summarize this year's re:Invent going in to 2022, what would you say is happening in this industry right now? >> You know, I'm just super excited about the EKS market and how fast it's growing. We're seeing EKS in a lot of places. We're super excited about helping EKS customers scale. And I think it's great to see Amazon adopting that standard API from Kubernetes. And I think that's going to be, just awesome to watch the creativity the industry is going to have around it. >> Well, great insight, thanks for coming on. And again, we'll work on that Cube API for you. The virtualization of theCUBE is here. We're virtual, which we could be in-person and hope to see you in-person soon. Thanks for coming on. >> You too John, thank you. >> Okay, Cube's coverage of alias re:Invent 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Dec 1 2021

SUMMARY :

about the big Tanzu cloud Hey John, great to have you back on. that the sovereign life cycles over it for sort of proving that the is that on the wave of IT, And the way I talked to our for the folks out there watching And I tend to start with why is that you have the true so that you can deploy it to So the world's becoming, I And I think that's true What is the big narrative is that Tanzu can not only help you most of the enterprises? And that's the difference in it's not good enough, to your point. and others that are saying, And if you can unify that And I think this is what Great to have you on. And I think that's going to be, and hope to see you in-person soon. of alias re:Invent 2021.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

JamesPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

James WattersPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

one billionQUANTITY

0.99+

2016DATE

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

TanzuORGANIZATION

0.99+

2022DATE

0.99+

three billionQUANTITY

0.99+

DevSecOpsTITLE

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.99+

LambdaTITLE

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

SunORGANIZATION

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

onceQUANTITY

0.99+

KubernetesTITLE

0.98+

first 10 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

172 processorsQUANTITY

0.98+

one exampleQUANTITY

0.98+

threeQUANTITY

0.98+

pandemicEVENT

0.98+

AKSORGANIZATION

0.98+

each yearQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

HPEORGANIZATION

0.97+

HeptioORGANIZATION

0.97+

a decade agoDATE

0.97+

12 of factorsQUANTITY

0.96+

three stepsQUANTITY

0.96+

vSphereTITLE

0.96+

pandemicsEVENT

0.96+

TwoQUANTITY

0.96+

Amazon RaguORGANIZATION

0.96+

DevOpsTITLE

0.95+

10 years agoDATE

0.95+

EKSORGANIZATION

0.94+

first modelQUANTITY

0.94+

todayDATE

0.93+

re:InventEVENT

0.93+

12 factorQUANTITY

0.93+

past year and a halfDATE

0.91+

2021TITLE

0.9+

AWS reInvent 2021 James Watters1


 

(upbeat music) >> Welcome back everyone to theCUBE's continuous coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. We're here with James Watters, CTO of Modern Applications at VMware here to talk about the big Tanzu cloud native application wave, the modernization's here. James, great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Hey John, great to have you back on. And really excited about re:Invent this year. And I've been watching your coverage of it. There's lots of exciting stuff going on in this space. >> Awesome. Well, James, you've been riding the wave of, I would call cloud 1.0, 2.0 what do you want to call it, the initial wave of cloud where the advent of replatforming is there. You know all these benefits and things are moving fast. Things are being developed. A lot of endeavors, things are tracking. Some are kicking, Kubernetes kicks in, and now the big story is over the past year and a half. Certainly the pandemic highlighted is this big wave that's hitting now, which is the real, the modernization of the enterprise, the modernization of software development. And even Amazon was saying that in one of our talks that the sovereign life cycles over it should be completely put away to bed. And that DevOps is truly here. And you add security, you got DevSecOps. So an entirely new, large scale, heavy use of data, new methodologies are all hitting right now. And if you're not on that wave your driftwood, what's your take? >> Oh, I think you're dead John, and you know, kind of the first 10 years of working on this for sort of proving that the microservices, the container, the declared of automation, the DevOps patterns were the future. And I think everyone's agreed now. And I think DevSecOps and the trends around app modernization are really around bringing that to scale for enterprises. So the conversations I tend to be having are, Hey, you've done a little Kubernetes. You've done some modern apps and APIs, but how do you really scale this across your enterprise? That's what I think is excited today. And that's what we're talking about. Some of the tools we're bringing to Amazon to help people achieve faster, consumption, better scale, more security. >> You know, one of the things about VMware that's been impressive over the years is that on the wave of IT, they already had great operational install base. They did a deal with Amazon Ragu did that. I think 2016, that kind of cleared the air. They're not going to do their own cloud or they have cloud efforts kind of solidifies that. And then incomes, Kubernetes, and then you saw a completely different cloud native wave coming in with the Tanzu, the Heptio acquisition. And since then a lot's been done. Can you just take us through the Tanzu evolution because I think this is a cornerstone of what's happening right now. >> Yeah, that's a great question, John. I think that the emergence of Kubernetes as a common set of APIs that every cloud and almost every infrastructure agrees on was a huge one. And the way I talked to our clients about is that VMware is doing a couple of things in this space. The first is that we're recognizing that as an infrastructure or baking Kubernetes into every vSphere, be it vSphere on-prem, be it BMC on Amazon. You're just going to find Kubernetes is a big part of each year. So that's kind of a big step one, but it's in some ways the same way that Amazon is doing with EKS and Azure EKS, but like every infrastructure provider is bringing Kubernetes everywhere. And then that kind of unleashes this really exciting moment where you've got this global control plane that you can program to be your DevSecOps platform. And Kubernetes has this incredible model of extensibility where you can add CRDs and program, right against the Kubernetes APIs with your additional features and functions you want your DevSecOps pipeline. And so it's created this opportunity for Tanzu to kind of have then a global control plan, which we call Tanzu Mission Control to bring all of those Kubernetes running in different clouds together. And then the last thing that we'll talk about a little bit more is this Tanzu Application Platform, which is bringing a developer experience to Kubernetes. So that you're not always starting with what I like to say, like, oh, I have Kubernetes, am I done? There's a lot more to the story than that. >> I want to get to this Tanzu Application Platform on EKS. I think that's a big story at VMware. We've seen that, but before we do that for the folks out there watching who are like, I'm now seeing this, whether they're young, new to the industry or enterprises who have replatforming or refactoring, trying to understand what is a modern application. So give us the definition in your words, what is a modern application? >> You know, John, it's a great question. And I tend to start with why and like, hey, how did we get here? And you, you and I both, I think, used to work for the bigger iron vendors back in the day. And we've seen the age of the big box Silicon Valley. I don't know, I worked at Sun just across the aisle here and basically we'd sell you a big box and then once or twice a year, you'd change the software on it. And so in a sense, like there was no chance to do user-oriented design or any of these things. Like you kind of got what you got and you hope to scale it. And then modern applications have been much more of the age of like what you might say, like Instagram or some of these modern apps that are very user-oriented and how you're changing that user interface that user design might change every week based on user feedback. And you're constantly using big data to adjust that modern app experience. And so modern apps to me are inherently iterative and inherently scalable and amenable to change. And that's where the 12 factor application manifesto was written, a blog was written a decade ago, basically saying here's how you can start to design apps to be constantly upgradable. So to me, modern apps, 12 of factors, one of them Kubernetes compatible, but the real point is that they should be flexible to be constantly iterated on maybe at least once a week at a minimum and designed and engineered to do that. And that takes them away from the old vertically scaled apps that kind of ran on 172 processors that you would infrequently update in the past. Those are what you might call like cloud apps. Is that helpful? >> Yeah, totally helpful. And by the way, those old iron vendors, they're now called the on-premise vendors and, you know, HPE, Dell and whatnot, IBM. But the thing about the cloud is, is that you have the true infrastructure as code happening. It's happened, it's happening, but faster and better and greater the goodness there. So you got DevSecOps, which is just DevOps with security. So DevSecOps is the standard now that everyone's shooting for. So what that means is I'm a developer, I just want to write code, the infrastructure got to work for me. So things like Lambda functions are all great things. So assuming that there's going to be this now programmable layer for developers just to do stuff. What is, in context to that need, what is the Tanzu Application Platform about and how does it work? >> Yeah, that's a great question, John. So once you have Kubernetes, you have this abundance of programmable, inner infrastructure resources. You can do almost anything with it, right? Like you can run machine learning workflows, you can run microservices, you can build APIs, you can import legacy apps to it, but it doesn't come out of the box with a set of application patterns and a set of controllers that are built for just, you know, modern apps. It comes with sort of a lot of flexibility and it expects you to understand a pretty broad surface area of APIs. So what we're doing is we're following in the footsteps of companies like Netflix and Uber, et cetera, all of which built kind of a developer platform on top of their Kubernetes infrastructure to say, here's your more templatized path to production. So you don't have to configure everything. You're just changing the right parts of the application. And we kind of go through three steps. The first is an application template that says, here's how to build a streaming app on Kubernetes, click here, and you'll get in your version control and we'll build a Kubernetes manifest for it. Two, is an automated containerization, which is we'll take your app and auto create a container for it so that we know it's secure and you can't make a mistake. And then three is that it will auto detect your application and build a Kubernetes deployment for it so that you can deploy it to Kubernetes in a reliable way. We're basically trying to reduce the burden on the developer from having to understand everything about Kubernetes, to really understanding their domain of the application. Does that make sense? >> Yeah, and this kind of is inline, you mentioned Netflix early on. They were one of the pioneers in inside AWS, but they had the full hyperscaler developers. They had those early hardcore devs that are like unicorns. No, you can't hire these people. They're just not many enough in the world. So the world's becoming, I won't say democratization, that's an overused word, but what we're getting to is if I get this right, you're saying you're going to eliminate the heavy lifting, the boring mundane stuff. >> Yeah, even at Netflix as is great of a developers they have, they still built kind of a microservices or an application platform on top of AWS. And I think that's true of Kubernetes today, which if you go to a Kubernetes conference, you'll often see, don't expose Kubernetes to developers. So tons of application platforms starts to really solve that question. What do you expose to a developer when they want to consume Kubernetes? >> So let's ask you, I know you do a lot of customer visits, that's one of the jobs that make you go out in the field which you like doing and working backwards on the customers has been in the DNA of VMware for years. What is the big narrative with the customers? What's their pain point? How else has the pandemics shown them projects that are working and not working, and they want to come out of it with a growth strategy. VMware is now an independent company. You guys got the platform, what are the customers doing with it? >> Well, I'll give you one example. You know, I went out and I was chatting with the retailer, had seen their online sales goes from one billion to like three billion during the pandemic. And they had been using kind of packaged shopping cart software before like a basic online store that they bought and configured. And they realized they needed to get great at modern apps to keep up with customer demand. And so I would say in general, we've seen the drive, the need for modern apps and digital transformation is just really skyrocketing and everyone's paying attention to it. And then I think they're looking for a trusted partner and they're debating, do we build it all in-house or do we turn to a partner that can help us build this above the cloud? And I think for the people that want an enterprise trusted brand, they'll have a lot of engineering talent behind it. There's been strong interest in Tanzu. And I think the big message we're trying to get out is that Tanzu can not only help you in your on-prem infrastructure, but it can also really help you on public cloud. And I think people are surprised by just how much. >> It's just in the common thread. I see that it's that point is right on is that these companies that don't digitize their business and build an application for their customer are going to get taken away by a startup. I mean, we've seen, it's so easy if you don't have an app for that, you're out of business. I mean, this is like, no, no, it's not like maybe we should do the cloud, let's get proactive. Pretty much it's critical path now for companies. So I'm sure you agree with that, but what's the progress of most of the enterprises? What percentage do you think are having this realization? >> I would say at least 70, 80%, if not more, are there now, and 10 years ago, I used to kind of have to tell stories, like, you know, some startups going to come along and they might disrupt you and people kind of give you that like, yeah, yeah, yeah. You know, I get it. And now it's sort of like, hey, someone's already in our market with an API. Tell me how to build API first apps we need to compete. And that's the difference in the strategic conversation kind of post pandemic and post, you know, the last 10 years. >> All right, final question for you 'cause this is right great thread. I've seen having a web interface it's not good enough, to your point. You got to have an application that they're engaging with, with all the modern capabilities, because the needs there, the expectation for the customers there. What new things are you seeing beyond mobile that are coming around the pike for enterprises, obviously web to mobile, mobile to what? What's next? >> I think the thing that's interesting is there is a bigger push to say more and more of what we do should be an API both internally, like, hey, other teams might want to consume some of these services as a well-formed API. I call it kind of like Stripe MB. Like you look at all these companies, they're like, Hey, stripes worth a hundred billion dollars now because they built a great API. What about us? And so I've seen a lot of industries from automotive to of course financial services and others that are saying, what if we gave our developers internally great APIs? And what if we also expose those APIs externally, we could get a lot, a more rat, fast moving business than the traditional model we might've had in the past. >> It's interesting, you know, commoditizing and automating a way infrastructure or software or capable workflows is actually normal. And if you can unify that in a way that's just better I mean, you have a lower cost structure, but the value doesn't go away, right? So I think a lot of this comes down to, beauty's in the eye of the beholder. I mean, that's how DevSecOps works. I mean, it's agile, it's faster, but you still have to achieve the value of the net is lower cost. What's your take on that? >> Well, I think you're dead right, John. And I think this is what was surprising about Stripe is it was possible before Stripe to go out as a developer and kind of pulled together a backend that did payments, but boy, it was hard. And I think that's the same thing with kind of this tons of application platform and the developer experience focus is people are realizing they can't hire enough developers. So this is the other thing that's happened during the pandemic and the great resignation, if you will, the war for talent is on. And you know, when I talked to a customer, like we might be able to help you, even 30% with your developer productivity, there's like one out of four developers. You might not have to be able to have to recruit they're all in. And so I think that API first model and the developer experience model are the same thing, which is like, it doesn't have to just be possible. It should be excellent. >> Well, great insight learning a lot. Of course, we should move to theCube API and we'll plug into your applications. We're here in the studio with our API, James. Great to have you on. Final word, what's your take this, the big story for re:Invent. If you had to summarize this year's re:Invent going in to 2022, what would you say is happening in this industry right now? >> You know, I'm just super excited about the EKS market and how fast it's growing. We're seeing EKS in a lot of places. We're super excited about helping EKS customers scale. And I think it's great to see Amazon adopting that standard API from Kubernetes. And I think that's going to be, just awesome to watch the creativity the industry is going to have around it. >> Well, great insight, thanks for coming on. And again, we'll work on that Cube API for you. The virtualization of theCUBE is here. We're virtual, which we could be in-person and hope to see you in-person soon. Thanks for coming on. >> You too John, thank you. >> Okay, Cube's coverage of alias re:Invent 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Nov 15 2021

SUMMARY :

about the big Tanzu cloud Hey John, great to have you back on. that the sovereign life cycles over it for sort of proving that the is that on the wave of IT, And the way I talked to our for the folks out there watching And I tend to start with why is that you have the true so that you can deploy it to So the world's becoming, I And I think that's true What is the big narrative is that Tanzu can not only help you most of the enterprises? And that's the difference in it's not good enough, to your point. and others that are saying, And if you can unify that And I think this is what Great to have you on. And I think that's going to be, and hope to see you in-person soon. of alias re:Invent 2021.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

JamesPERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

James WattersPERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

2016DATE

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

TanzuORGANIZATION

0.99+

172 processorsQUANTITY

0.99+

one billionQUANTITY

0.99+

James Watters1PERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.99+

2022DATE

0.99+

three billionQUANTITY

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

pandemicEVENT

0.99+

KubernetesTITLE

0.98+

LambdaTITLE

0.98+

10 years agoDATE

0.98+

onceQUANTITY

0.98+

one exampleQUANTITY

0.98+

DevSecOpsTITLE

0.98+

pandemicsEVENT

0.98+

first 10 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

Amazon RaguORGANIZATION

0.98+

threeQUANTITY

0.98+

SunORGANIZATION

0.98+

12 of factorsQUANTITY

0.97+

HeptioORGANIZATION

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

each yearQUANTITY

0.97+

DevOpsTITLE

0.96+

HPEORGANIZATION

0.96+

todayDATE

0.96+

vSphereTITLE

0.96+

three stepsQUANTITY

0.95+

EKSORGANIZATION

0.95+

a decade agoDATE

0.94+

80%QUANTITY

0.94+

TwoQUANTITY

0.94+

re:InventEVENT

0.93+

2021DATE

0.91+

past year and a halfDATE

0.91+

Fatih Yilmaz and Emre Tanriverdi, Trendyol | Couchbase ConnectONLINE 2021


 

>>Welcome back to Couchbase connect. My name is Dave Vellante and we're going to dig into a customer case study of sorts with two software engineers from a company called trendy all the largest e-commerce platform in Turkey. And with me are in MRA, tan Rivera, both software engineers at trendy. All welcome. Good to see you guys. Hey, before we get into the story, maybe you can tell us a little bit about trendy all. >>Let me answer that question first. Um, tri-annual uh, today is, um, 10 years old. Uh, actually, uh, it starts with them, um, e-commerce company, uh, Jen, uh, especially, uh, for clothing, uh, today, uh, it's serves several, uh, services, uh, mainly still e-commerce right. Um, we, uh, we do our business mainly on technology and we even have a say in technology, uh, technology is our main concern actually. Um, just like that actually now, >>So thank you for that. I mean, you started, I think, I think the company was founded in 2009, 2010. So you weren't, you were just, you know, kind of which we would consider the, sort of the modern era at the same time. When you look back 10 years, you know, major challenges, major advancements from a technology standpoint. So you at, at the time you had a, uh, a legacy database and you, you had a migraine, maybe you could describe the business conditions that drove you to think about actually making a change. What was the before, and then we can get into the after and what was driving that change? >>Um, maybe I could start it a bit. Well, uh, we have a recommendation domain and try new. It's like when you, when you look at a certain product, like for example, you look at a pencil, it it's commanding you, uh, any razor, uh, if you are going to buy a pink dress, it's going to recommend you a yellow dress. So if you're going to maybe buy pants, it will show you some t-shirts according to it. So, uh, since the recommendations, domain group larger, uh, we, we have struggled, uh, to keep it high scale, and it wasn't a relational DB at first, but that's even as product count increased and, uh, our right frequency increased day by day, uh, and our reef performance was affected very dramatically. Uh, I believe. Yeah. >>So you were using a traditional RDBMS, uh, and then, and, and the issue was you quite, you couldn't make the recommendations fast enough. And, you know, we always say what's real time. Real time is before you lose the customer. So you, you have to make those recommendations in time for the customer to act otherwise, you know, what do you do? Send an email after the fact, Hey, you bought this, nobody's going to pay attention to that. Right? You want to catch them in the moment. Um, and so, so what was it that, that led you to, to Couchbase and w and what was the experience of that? You know, whether it was onboarding, you know, the technology, you know, how difficult was it to get up and running to where you are today? >>Um, we were using ch Couchbase in, uh, in inter-annual, um, for several years, and we had experienced on that. Uh, and, uh, we actually, we need performance as described. So, uh, we convert our data structure to, from relational DB to, um, noise, Carol Levy, um, them actually on our recommendation, uh, platform, the main problem was, uh, invalidation process. You know, um, we are selling things and, um, in seconds they can be sold out and we, we shouldn't be recommend them anymore. And we are, we are keeping track of this by invalidation process and relational DB writing those data to our relationship Libby was, uh, was taking two, two minutes too much time. And, um, by changing this structure to, uh, pathways, we, we, we see that benefits, uh, and it takes so, so, uh, uh, short time, actually, >>I'm so sorry if, if I can just clarify w what was taking a long time, the, the updating the actual records, so that you could actually inform a customer that it was out of stock, or was it the coding that was too complicated? >>Well, it was, it was not because, um, there are millions of products intangible, and, uh, those issues are coming huge, actually. So we are keeping track of time if it's sold out or it's, it can be sellable, uh, when, when a product, uh, detail is seen by the customers, we are recommending some other products too, but those other products must be sellable too. So the main, the main problem was that, and, uh, we are writing them in our relational DB. There is a huge rights law actually. So it was not coding. It was the amount of data actually. >>Okay. And so it was the update intensity, um, within the database and the ability of the database to actually return accurate results quickly. So what was the after, like, uh, can you talk about sort of the, the business impact? What were the, the improvements that you've experienced? >>Yeah. Maybe I can ask her that, uh, like parties said that the main reason we switched is because that, uh, there are so many products coming near in trend, and many of them are being stopped being sold out and the updates to it, it was on a relational, the vendor rights, or too much that you couldn't, uh, dur customers that fast reply because the database was getting effected by the amount of high rights. Because when you think about it, there are millions of products coming, and there are millions of rights, uh, operations on the database. So those affecting the reach performance. So, uh, it, it could occur to you that when you click on a product, you would see maybe as took out product as a recommendation, or maybe a product that is not in the website anymore. So, uh, when we switched to, uh, Couchbase that, uh, we saw that, uh, it's using less resources, which, uh, using less posts, active, alive, and it's also, uh, giving responses faster. >>The main reason, uh, we were using relational DB at first was the invalidation process like five. He said, because it was, we had a consumer that was listening to messages, uh, the innovation messages, and then, uh, and then the writing them into database. But, uh, in the part, uh, it meant that actively writing to database that for every product document that you would need to update the document, but for, uh, for, for, uh, for relational DB, it would be vetoed easier to just make this product, uh, every available, false, or true. So that's why we were sticking with relationship with DB at first. And that's why we made it that first as a relational DB, but as time increased and our product count, and our sellers increased, we realized that, uh, we should find another solution to the invalidation process, and we should, uh, switch because, uh, I mean, it CA it has come to a point at one point that it would just maybe, uh, take a solid, so much time that, uh, we were scaling our consumers at nighttime to just not affect daily users anymore. >>Uh, so that's why that's the main reason we switched. And, uh, after switching, we had in, uh, like I said, the response time and high write throughput, and also one of the reasons is also because that the, uh, the application that was with the use of Couchbase because, uh, since strangled is growing larger than our main data centers. And, uh, like we can see that every day, sometimes we deploy our, uh, apps to yet another cluster. And we, that's why we sometimes need to have backups or different data centers, and Couchbase was providing very good relations, very good solutions to this, which is. Yeah. That's why we switched actually. So we asked >>Couchbase running it's if I understand it, it's running the recommendation engine. And do you still use a traditional RDBMS for the transaction system or is Couchbase doing both? >>Yeah, okay. Uh, we are, uh, actually inter-annual, we are in discovery a team, actually, we call it tribe and in discovery, tribe, uh, relational DB, I think, uh, now, uh, very small, uh, small, uh, teams are using it. Um, it's personally just very low actually. Uh, but, uh, other other tribes, for example, orders, checkout, and maybe, uh, uh, promotions, uh, something like other teams are still using RDBMS, but in discovery team, it's very important to serve customers very fast. We need to show them the products immediately. We need to personalize them. Uh, we sh we should, uh, show them, uh, related products in the meantime, in real time, actually. So in this current Stripe, we are, um, barely using it, uh, RDBMS systems, actually. >>How hard was it to migrate from the RDBMS? Because you hear a lot of stories about how difficult that is to do. You've got to freeze the code, you bringing up new code, you've got to synchronize the functionality. How did you manage that? >>Well, to be honest with you, just ask the data science team to just send the products. Uh, at the same time, we were like, we were keeping the legacy API open that the clients were still coming there. And, um, to be honest, there were lots of legs on that, too. So even if, uh, the, the newer products came a bit later, uh, it shouldn't be seen because it was always coming late. So, uh, we had, we made a new API that is connecting to Couchbase and we wanted the data science team to start feeding it, but we asked the clients to switch it by time. I mean, we were still supporting the old one, but, uh, when we, when we asked the clients to switch to the new API, we just closed the last one. So we didn't really migrate any data to be honest. Like we, we, it was from scratch. And since it's a, it's a recommendation domain, uh, we believe it's better to, uh, add data's from scratch because in our new domains, we are storing them in documents. They are always sending a new list to us. So that's how it gets updated all the time. So since it's not a user related data, it wasn't really like a migration process. >>Is this is part of the secret sauce that you're doing. Schema lists, no schema on, right to Couchbase. And is that correct? And how are you handling it? I'm like, how are you getting that awesome write performance? >>Well, the main reason we believe is that, uh, before, when it was relational DB, like for example, loan product to one product and a second product to first product, third product, first of all, that like you were duplicating the records so that when the product gets removed, uh, from, from a product recommendation, or maybe one of, if a product is getting invisible, for any reason, it should be removed, or maybe it could be a stockout that it means it's not that for every record, you are sending your records for invalidation, but in our new system, it means that this, uh, for this content, there are 24 contents let's say, and like four of them that's finished. It's not there. It's okay. You're just replacing the whole list so that you are not duplicating the records. I mean, this is not like first product first and first, the second, and first to third, and first changes you are replicating this, this change three times, like a delete, uh, product one from three, three product, one from two, and you are deprecating the deletion record, but now we are just replacing the list. So you are doing that all of the operation in 1, 1, 1, uh, Kafka queue message. If I should be able, if I was able to, uh, tell about it. So it's a bit hard to explain it in, uh, in speech, but, uh, we have a nice graphic that's showing how we are doing it now. >>That makes sense. Okay. Thank you for that. And so, as you think about, you're modernizing your application infrastructure, where are you at today? How do you see this modernization effort going forward >>Actually, um, today, uh, we are mainly looking for, um, cross cluster replication. Uh, all our products are, uh, uh, deployed, uh, different clusters and different geographical locations. Uh, we, we always using ch um, we try to always use, um, modern products and, uh, uh, try to avoid, uh, old relational databases, especially for our discovery. Right. And, uh, my mandala is modernizing it, uh, all, uh, engineer's keeping up to date with recent technologies and, uh, our customers are happier. They are not seeing some glitches, some, uh, rates, uh, or while they're using our products. >>Okay. So maybe I could double click on that. So, cause you mentioned the impact of customers and I'm interested in your organizational impact and what it means for you internally, but, but when you talk about cross cluster replication, is that to scale, uh, is that a performance impact? Is that for availability? What's the impact of that effort? That modernization effort? >>Uh, I believe it's, it's all, uh, main reason is availability. I believe. Uh, like we can't know when a cluster can go down, we can't be sure about it, uh, in a, in a system we can, but that we should be up and running all the time. And, uh, there should be some, uh, some backups that, uh, that can switch when a cluster goes down. But also the main reason, uh, well, one of the main reasons is to be able to scale because, uh, the, the clusters that we had wasn't enough, uh, considering our user base. So, uh, let's say you want to even extend your user base, but, uh, like the cluster is being a bottleneck to you because you can't get that much users, but, uh, when you do post cluster that you have backup and you have scalability and it's, uh, considering how new considering if the machines are newer, maybe faster response times. I don't know, uh, maybe, uh, network part would know that better, but, uh, yeah, but all of them, I will leave. >>Great guys. Well, thank you so much for sharing your story, uh, uh, MRA and Fati. Uh, appreciate you guys coming on the cube. >>Thanks a lot. Yeah. Thanks. Thanks. Thank you for, uh, hosting. >>Yeah, it's our pleasure. And thank you for watching. Couchbase connect online on the cube, keep it right there for more great content from the event.

Published Date : Oct 26 2021

SUMMARY :

Good to see you guys. Uh, actually, uh, it starts with them, So you at, at the time you had a, uh, a legacy database and uh, any razor, uh, if you are going to buy a pink dress, it's going to recommend you a yellow dress. and, and the issue was you quite, you couldn't make the recommendations fast enough. Uh, and, uh, we actually, uh, detail is seen by the customers, we are recommending So what was the after, like, uh, can you talk about sort of the, So, uh, it, it could occur to you that when you click on a product, uh, take a solid, so much time that, uh, we were scaling our consumers at nighttime And, uh, like we can see that every day, And do you still use a traditional RDBMS for the transaction system or is Couchbase uh, actually inter-annual, we are in discovery a team, You've got to freeze the code, you bringing up new code, And since it's a, it's a recommendation domain, uh, we believe it's better to, And how are you handling it? in speech, but, uh, we have a nice graphic that's showing how we are doing it now. And so, as you think about, you're modernizing your application all our products are, uh, uh, deployed, uh, is that a performance impact? but, uh, when you do post cluster that you have backup and you have scalability and it's, Uh, appreciate you guys coming on the cube. Thank you for, uh, hosting. And thank you for watching.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

2009DATE

0.99+

TurkeyLOCATION

0.99+

Emre TanriverdiPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Fatih YilmazPERSON

0.99+

Carol LevyPERSON

0.99+

24 contentsQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

first productQUANTITY

0.99+

one productQUANTITY

0.99+

third productQUANTITY

0.99+

two minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

thirdQUANTITY

0.99+

FatiPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

2010DATE

0.99+

two software engineersQUANTITY

0.99+

three timesQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.98+

second productQUANTITY

0.98+

fourQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

fiveQUANTITY

0.97+

2021DATE

0.97+

one pointQUANTITY

0.97+

JenPERSON

0.96+

LibbyPERSON

0.95+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.93+

RiveraPERSON

0.93+

CouchbaseORGANIZATION

0.93+

millions of rightsQUANTITY

0.93+

10 years oldQUANTITY

0.93+

both softwareQUANTITY

0.89+

millions of productsQUANTITY

0.88+

MRALOCATION

0.88+

first changesQUANTITY

0.86+

Couchbase connectORGANIZATION

0.84+

CouchbaseTITLE

0.83+

MRAPERSON

0.82+

trendyORGANIZATION

0.79+

KafkaPERSON

0.76+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.74+

three productQUANTITY

0.74+

TrendyolORGANIZATION

0.68+

doubleQUANTITY

0.65+

triQUANTITY

0.61+

Jerry Chen & Martin Mao | KubeCon + CloudNative Con NA 2021


 

>>Hey, welcome back everyone to cube Cod's coverage and cloud native con the I'm John for your husband, David Nicholson cube analyst, cloud analyst. Co-host you got two great guests, KIPP alumni, Jerry Chen needs no introduction partner at Greylock ventures have been on the case many times, almost like an analyst chair. It's great to see you. I got guest analyst and Martin mal who's the CEO co-founder of Chronosphere just closed a whopping $200 million series C round businesses. Booming. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on. Thank you. Hey, first of all, congratulations on the business translations, who would have known that observability and distributed tracing would be a big deal. Jerry, you predicted that in 2013, >>I think we predicted jointly cloud was going to be a big deal with 2013, right? And I think the rise of cloud creates all these markets behind it, right. This, you know, I always say you got to ride a wave bigger than you. And, uh, and so this ride on cloud and scale is the macro wave and, you know, Marty and Robin cryosphere, they're just drafted behind that wave, bigger scale, high cardinality, more data, more apps. I mean, that's, that's where the fuck. >>Yeah. Martin, all kidding aside. You know, we joke about this because we've had conversations where the philosophy of you pick the trend is your friend that you know, is going to be happening. So you can kind of see the big waves coming, but you got to stay true to it. And one of the things that we talk about is what's the next Amazon impact gonna look like? And we were watching the rise of Amazon. You go, if this continues a new way to do things is going to be upon us. Okay, you've got dev ops now, cloud native, but observability became really a key part of that. It's like almost the, I call it the network management in the cloud. It's like in a new way, you guys have been very successful. There's a lot of solutions out there. What's different. >>Yeah. I'd say for Kearney sphere, there's really three big differences. The first thing is that we're a platform. So we're still an observability platform. And by that, I mean, we solved the problem end to end. If thinking about observability and monitoring, you want to know when something's wrong, you want to be able to see how bad it is. And then you want to able to figure out what the root cause is. Often. There are solutions that do a part of that, that that problem might solve a part of the problem really well for a platform that does the whole thing. And 10 that's that's really the first thing. Second thing is we're really built for not just the cloud, but cloud native environments. So a microservices architecture on container-based infrastructure. And that is something that, uh, we, we have saw coming maybe 20 17, 20 18, but luckily for us, we were already solving this problem at Uber. That's where myself, my co-founder were back in 20 14, 20 15. So we already had the sort of perfect technology to solve this problem ahead of where the, the trend was going in the industry and therefore a purpose-built solution for this type of environment, a lot more effective than a lot of the existing. >>It's interesting, Jerry, you know, the view investing companies that have their problem, that they have to solve themselves as the new thing, versus someone says, Hey, there's a market. Let's build a solution for something. I don't really know. Well, that's kind of what's going on here. Right? It's >>That's why we love founders. Like Martin Marna, rod that come out with these hyperscale comes Uber's like we say, they've seen the future. You know, like there were Uber, they looked at the existing solutions out there trying to scale Promethease or you know, data dogs and the vendors. And it didn't work. It fell over, was too expensive. And so Martin Rob saw solid future. Like, this is where the world's going. We're going to solve it. They built MP3. It became cryosphere. And um, so I don't take any credit for that. You know, I just look fine folks that can see the future. >>Yeah. But they were solving their problem. No one else had anything. There's no general purpose software that managed servers you could buy, you guys were cutting your teeth into solving the pain. You had Uber. When did you guys figure out like, oh, well this is pretty big. >>Uh, probably about 20 17, 20 18 with a rise in popularity of Kubernetes. That's when we knew, oh wait, the whole world is shifting to this. It's not, no one could really it to just goober and the big tech giants of the world. And that's when we really knew, okay. The whole, the whole whole world is shifting here. And again, it's, it's sheer blind luck that we already had the ideal solution for this particular environment. It wasn't planned it. Wasn't what we were planning for back then. But, um, yeah. Get everything. >>It makes a lot of difference. When you walk into a customer and say, we had this problem, I can empathize with you. Not just say we've got solved. Exactly. Jerry, how do they compete in the cloud? We always talk about how Amazon and Azure want to eat up anything that they see that might, you know, something on AWS. Um, this castle in the cloud opportunity here. Okay. >>In the cloud. I mean, you know, we talked last time about how to fight the big three, uh, Amazon Azure and, uh, and Google. And I think for sure they have basic offerings, right. You know, Google Stackdriver years ago, they've done basically for Pete's offerings, basic modern offerings. I think you have like basic, simple needs. It's a great way to get started, but customers don't want kind of a piecemeal solution all the time. They want a full product. Like Datadog shows a better user experience, but full product is going to, you know, the better mousetrap the world will beat a path to your door. So first you can build a better product versus these point solutions. Number two is at some scale and some level complexity, those guys can handle like the demanding users that current affairs handling right now, right? The door dash, the world. >>And finally don't want the Fox guarding the hen house. You know, you don't want to say like Amazon monitoring, you can't depend on Amazon service monitoring your Amazon apps or Google service monitor your Google apps, having something that is independent and multi-cloud, that can dual things, Marta said, you know, see a triage, fixed your issues is kind of what you want. And, um, that's where the market's skilling. So I do believe that cloud guys will have an offering the space, but in our castle and cloud research, we saw that, yeah, there's a plenty of startups being funded. There's plenty of opportunity. And that the scoreboard between Splunk Datadog and all these other companies, that there's a huge amount of market and value to be created in this piece. So, >>So with, at, at the time, when you, you know, uh, uh, necessity is the mother of invention, you're an Uber, you have a practical problem to solve and use you look around you and you see that you're not the only entity out there that has this problem. Where are we in that wave? So not everyone is at, cloud-scale not everyone has adopted completely Kubernetes and cloud native for everything. Are we just at the beginning of this wave? How far from the >>Beach are we, we think we're just at the beginning of this wave right now. Um, and if you think about most enterprises today, they're still using on, and they're not even in perhaps in the cloud at all right. Are you still using perhaps APM and solutions, uh, on premise? So, um, if you look at that wave, we're just at the beginning of it. But when, but when we talked to a lot of these companies and you ask them for their three year vision, Kubernetes is a huge piece of that because everyone wants to be multi-cloud everyone to be hybrid eventually. And that's going to be the enabler of that. So, uh, we're just in the beginning now, but it seems like an inevitable wave that is coming. >>So obviously people evaluated that exactly the way you're evaluating that. Right. Thus the funding, right. Because no one makes that kind of investment without thinking that there is a multiplier on that over time. So that's pretty, that's a pretty exciting place. >>Yeah. I think to your point, a lot of companies are running into that situation right now, and they're looking at existing solutions there for us. It was necessity because there wasn't anything out there now that there is a lot of companies are not using their sort of precious engineering resources to build their own there. They would prefer to buy a solution because this is something that we can offer to all the companies. And it's not necessarily a business differentiating technology for the businesses themselves >>Distributed tracing in that really platform. That's the news. Um, and you mentioned you've got this, a good bid. You do some good business. Is scale the big differentiator for you guys? Or is it the functionality? Because it sounds like with clients like door dash, and it looks a lot like Uber, they're doing a lot of stuff too, and I'm sure everyone needs the card. Other people doing the same kind of thing, that scale, massive amount of consumer data coming in on the edge. Yeah. Is that the differentiation or do you work for the old one, you know, main street enterprise, right. >>Um, that is a good part of the differentiation and for our product thus far before we had a distributor tracing for monitoring and metric data, that was the main differentiation is the sheer volume of data that gets produced so much higher, really excited about distributor tracing because that's actually not just a scale problem. It's, it's a space that everybody can see the potential distributor tracing yet. No one has really realized that potential. So our offering right now is fairly unique. It does things that no other vendors out there can do. And we're really excited about that because we think that that fundamentally solves the problem differently, not just at a larger scale, >>Because you're an expert, what is distributed tracing. >>Yeah. Uh, it's, it's, it's a great question. So really, if you look at this retracing, it captures the details of a particular request. So a particular customer interaction with your business and it captures how that request flows through your complex architecture, right? So you have every detail of that at every step of the way. And you can imagine this data is extremely rich and extremely useful to figure out what the underlying root causes of issues are. The problem with that is it's very bit boast. It's a lot of data gets produced. A ton of data gets produced, every interaction, every request. So one of the main issues are in this space is that people can't afford cost effectively to store all of this data. Right? So one of the main differentiators for our product is we made it cost efficient enough to store everything. And when you have all the data, you have far better analytics and you have >>Machine learning is better. Everything's better with data. That's right. Yeah. Great. What's the blind spot out. Different customers, as cybersecurity is always looking for corners and threats that some people say it's not what you want. It's what you don't see that kills you. That's, that's a tracing issue. That's a data problem. How do you see that evolving in your customer base clients, trying to get a handle of the visibility into the data? >>Yeah. Um, I think right now, again, it's, it's very early in this space of people are just getting started here and you're completely correct where, you know, you need that visibility. And again, this is why it's such a differentiator to have all the data. If you can imagine with only 10% of the data or 1% of data, how can you actually detect any of these particular issues? Right. So, uh, uh, data is key to solving that >>Feel great to have you guys on expert and congratulations on the funding, Jerry. Good to see you take a minute to give a plug for the company. What do you guys do? And actually close around the funding, told you a million dollars. Congratulations. What are you looking for for hiring? What are your milestones? What's on your plan plan. >>Yeah. Uh, so with the spanning, it's really to, to, uh, continue to grow the company, right? So we're sort of hiring, as I told you earlier, we are, uh, we grew our revenue this year by, by 10 X in the sense of the 10 months of this year, thus far. So our team hasn't really grown 10 X. So, so we, we need to keep up with that grid. So hiring across the board on engineering side, on the go to market side, and I just continue to >>Beat that. The headquarters, your virtual, if you don't mind, we've gone >>Completely distributed. Now we're mostly in the U S have a bunch of folks in Seattle and in New York, however, we going completely remote. So hiring anyone in the U S anywhere in Europe, uh, >>Oh, I got you here. What's your investment thesis. Now you got castles in the cloud, by the way, if you haven't seen the research from Greylock, Jerry and the team called castles in the cloud, you can Google it. What's your thesis now? What are you investing in? >>Yeah, it is. It is hard to always predict the next wave. I mean, my job is to find the right founders, but I'd say the three core areas are still the same one is this cloud disruption to Martin's point we're. So early days, the wave, I say, number two, uh, there's vertical apps, different SAS applications be finance, healthcare construction, all are changing. I think healthcare, especially the past couple of years through COVID, we've seen that's a market that needs to be digitized. And finally, FinTech, we talked about this before everything becomes a payments company, right? And that's why Stripe is such a huge juggernaut. You know, I don't think the world's all Stripe, but be it insurance payments, um, you know, stuff in crypto, whatever. I think fintechs still has a lot of, a lot of market to grow. >>It's making things easier. It's a good formula right now. If you can reduce complexity, it makes things easy in every market. You're going to seems to be the formula. >>And like the next great thing is making today's crappy thing better. Right? So the next, the next brace shows making this cube crappy thing. Yeah, >>We're getting better every day on our 11th season or year, I'm calling things seasons now, episodes and season for streaming, >>All the seasons drop a Netflix binge, watch them all the >>Cube plus and NFTs for our early videos. There'll be worth something because they're not that good, Jerry. How, of course you're great. Thank you. Thanks guys. Thanks for coming on it. Cubes coverage here in a physical event, 2021 cloud being the con CubeCon I'm John farrier and Dave Nicholson. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Oct 14 2021

SUMMARY :

Hey, first of all, congratulations on the business translations, is the macro wave and, you know, Marty and Robin cryosphere, they're just drafted behind that wave, You know, we joke about this because we've had conversations where the philosophy of you pick the trend There are solutions that do a part of that, that that problem might solve a part of the problem really well It's interesting, Jerry, you know, the view investing companies that have their problem, that they have to solve themselves You know, I just look fine folks that can see the future. servers you could buy, you guys were cutting your teeth into solving the pain. it's, it's sheer blind luck that we already had the ideal solution for this particular environment. that they see that might, you know, something on AWS. user experience, but full product is going to, you know, the better mousetrap the world will beat a path to your door. And that the scoreboard between Splunk Datadog and all these other companies, How far from the So, um, if you look at that wave, we're just at the beginning of it. So obviously people evaluated that exactly the way you're evaluating that. differentiating technology for the businesses themselves Is that the differentiation or do you work for the old one, Um, that is a good part of the differentiation and for our product thus far before we had a distributor tracing for monitoring And when you have all the data, you have far better analytics and you have It's what you don't see that kills you. If you can imagine with only 10% of the data or 1% of data, how can you actually detect And actually close around the funding, told you a million dollars. So hiring across the board on engineering side, on the go to market side, The headquarters, your virtual, if you don't mind, we've gone So hiring anyone in the U S anywhere in Europe, uh, Jerry and the team called castles in the cloud, you can Google it. but be it insurance payments, um, you know, stuff in crypto, If you can reduce complexity, it makes things easy in every market. And like the next great thing is making today's crappy thing better. in a physical event, 2021 cloud being the con CubeCon I'm John farrier and Dave Nicholson.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
MartaPERSON

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jerry ChenPERSON

0.99+

JerryPERSON

0.99+

David NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

SeattleLOCATION

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

MartinPERSON

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

John farrierPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

1%QUANTITY

0.99+

three yearQUANTITY

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Martin malPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Martin MaoPERSON

0.99+

10 XQUANTITY

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.98+

AzureORGANIZATION

0.98+

$200 millionQUANTITY

0.98+

11th seasonQUANTITY

0.98+

MartyPERSON

0.98+

RobinPERSON

0.98+

10 monthsQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

FoxORGANIZATION

0.98+

Splunk DatadogORGANIZATION

0.97+

todayDATE

0.97+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.97+

this yearDATE

0.97+

COVIDTITLE

0.97+

U SLOCATION

0.97+

firstQUANTITY

0.97+

two great guestsQUANTITY

0.96+

KubeConEVENT

0.96+

Martin RobPERSON

0.95+

first thingQUANTITY

0.94+

Second thingQUANTITY

0.93+

10%QUANTITY

0.93+

20 14DATE

0.92+

waveEVENT

0.92+

bigEVENT

0.91+

KIPPORGANIZATION

0.91+

GreylockORGANIZATION

0.91+

ChronosphereORGANIZATION

0.91+

three core areasQUANTITY

0.91+

PetePERSON

0.89+

2021DATE

0.89+

million dollarsQUANTITY

0.89+

KubernetesTITLE

0.88+

past couple of yearsDATE

0.88+

Number twoQUANTITY

0.87+

CloudNative ConEVENT

0.86+

three big differencesQUANTITY

0.86+

20DATE

0.84+

10 X.QUANTITY

0.83+

10OTHER

0.79+

DatadogORGANIZATION

0.79+

NA 2021EVENT

0.77+

Cube plusCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.76+

20 15DATE

0.75+

A ton of dataQUANTITY

0.73+

FinTechORGANIZATION

0.71+

CubeConEVENT

0.68+

Day 2 theCUBE Kickoff | UiPath FORWARD IV


 

>>From the Bellagio hotel in Las Vegas. It's the cube covering UI path forward for brought to you by UI path. >>Good morning. Welcome to the cubes coverage of UI path forward for day two. Live from the Bellagio in Las Vegas. I'm Lisa Martin with Dave Velante, Dave. We had a great action packed day yesterday. We're going to have another action packed day today. We've got the CEO coming on. We've got customers coming on, but there's been a lot in the news last 24 hours. Facebook, what are your thoughts? >>Yeah, so wall street journal today, headline Facebook hearing fuels call for rain in on big tech. All right, everybody's going after big tech. Uh, for those of you who missed it, 60 minutes had a, uh, an interview with the whistleblower. Her name is, uh, Francis Haugen. She's very credible, just a little background. I'll give you my take. I mean, she was hired to help set Facebook straight and protect privacy of individuals, of children. And I really feel like, again, she, she didn't come across as, as bitter or antagonistic, but, but I feel as though she feels betrayed, right, I think she was hired to do a job. They lured her in to say, Hey, this is again, just my take to say, Hey, we want your help in earnest to protect the privacy of our users, our citizens, et cetera. And I think she feels betrayed because she's now saying, listen, this is not cool. >>You hired us to do a job. We in earnest, went in and tried to solve this problem. And you guys kind of ignored it and you put profit ahead of safety. And I think that is the fundamental crux of this. Now she made a number of really good points in her hearing yesterday and I'll, and we'll try to summarize, I mean, there's a lot of putting advertising revenue ahead of children's safety and, and, and others. The examples they're using are during the 2020 election, they shut down any sort of negative conversations. They would be really proactive about that, but after the election, they turned it back on and you know, we all know what happened on January 6th. So there's sort of, you know, the senators are trying that night. Um, the second thing is she talked about Facebook as a wall garden, and she made the point yesterday at the congressional hearings that Google actually, you can data scientists, anybody can go download all the data that Google has on you. >>You and I can do that. Right? There's that website that we've gone to and you look at all the data Google has and you kind of freak out. Yeah, you can't do that with Facebook, right? It's all hidden. So it's kind of this big black box. I will say this it's interesting. The calls for breaking up big tech, Bernie Sanders tweeted something out yesterday said that, uh, mark Zuckerberg was worth, I don't know. I think 9 billion in 2007 or eight or nine, whatever it was. And he's worth 122 billion today, which of course is mostly tied up in Facebook stock, but still he's got incredible wealth. And then Bernie went on his red it's time to break up big tech. It's time to get people to pay their fair share, et cetera. I'm intrigued that the senators don't have as much vigilance around other industries, whether it's big pharma, food companies addicting children to sugar and the like, but that doesn't let Facebook. >>No, it doesn't, but, but you ha you bring up a good point. You and I were chatting about this yesterday. What the whistleblower is identifying is scary. It's dangerous. And the vast majority, I think of its users, don't understand it. They're not aware of it. Um, and why is big tech being maybe singled out and use as an example here, when, to your point, you know, the addiction to sugar and other things are, uh, have very serious implications. Why is big tech being singled out here as the poster child for what's going wrong? >>Well, and they're comparing it to big tobacco, which is the last thing you want to be compared to as big tobacco. But the, but the, but the comparison is, is valid in that her claim, the whistleblower's claim was that Facebook had data and research that it knew, it knows it's hurting, you know, you know, young people. And so what did it do? It created, you know, Instagram for kids, uh, or it had 600,000. She had another really interesting comment or maybe one of the senators did. Facebook said, look, we scan our records and you know, kids lie. And we, uh, we kicked 600,000 kids off the network recently who were underaged. And the point was made if you have 600,000 people on your network that are underage, you have to go kill. That's a problem. Right? So now the flip side of this, again, trying to be balanced is Facebook shut down Donald Trump and his nonsense, uh, and basically took him off the platform. >>They kind of thwarted all the hunter Biden stuff, right. So, you know, they did do some, they did. It's not like they didn't take any actions. Uh, and now they're up, you know, in front of the senators getting hammered. But I think the Zuckerberg brings a lot of this on himself because he put out an Instagram he's on his yacht, he's drinking, he's having fun. It's like he doesn't care. And he, you know, who knows, he probably doesn't. She also made the point that he owns an inordinate percentage and controls an inordinate percentage of the stock, I think 52% or 53%. So he can kind of do what he wants. And I guess, you know, coming back to public policy, there's a lot of narrative of, I get the billionaires and I get that, you know, the Mo I'm all for billionaires paying more taxes. >>But if you look at the tax policies that's coming out of the house of representatives, it really doesn't hit the billionaires the way billionaires can. We kind of know the way that they protect their wealth is they don't sell and they take out low interest loans that aren't taxed. And so if you look at the tax policies that are coming out, they're really not going after the billionaires. It's a lot of rhetoric. I like to deal in facts. And so I think, I think there's, there's a lot of disingenuous discourse going on right now at the same time, you know, Facebook, they gotta, they gotta figure it out. They have to really do a better job and become more transparent, or they are going to get broken up. And I think that's a big risk to the, to their franchise and maybe Zuckerberg doesn't care. Maybe he just wants to give it a, give it to the government, say, Hey, are you guys are on? It >>Happens. What do you think would happen with Amazon, Google, apple, some of the other big giants. >>That's a really good question. And I think if you look at the history of the us government, in terms of ant anti monopolistic practices, it spent decade plus going after IBM, you know, at the end of the day and at the same thing with Microsoft at the end of the day, and those are pretty big, you know, high profiles. And then you look at, at T and T the breakup of at T and T if you take IBM, IBM and Microsoft, they were slowed down by the U S government. No question I've in particular had his hands shackled, but it was ultimately their own mistakes that caused their problems. IBM misunderstood. The PC market. It gave its monopoly to Intel and Microsoft, Microsoft for its part. You know, it was hugging windows. They tried to do the windows phone to try to jam windows into everything. >>And then, you know, open source came and, you know, the world woke up and said, oh, there's this internet that's built on Linux. You know, that kind of moderated by at T and T was broken up. And then they were the baby bells, and then they all got absorbed. And now you have, you know, all this big, giant telcos and cable companies. So the history of the U S government in terms of adjudicating monopolistic behavior has not been great at the same time. You know, if companies are breaking the law, they have to be held accountable. I think in the case of Amazon and Google and apple, they, a lot of lawyers and they'll fight it. You look at what China's doing. They just cut right to the chase and they say, don't go to the, they don't litigate. They just say, this is what we're doing. >>Big tech, you can't do a, B and C. We're going to fund a bunch of small startups to go compete. So that's an interesting model. I was talking to John Chambers about this and he said, you know, he was flat out that the Western way is the right way. And I believe in, you know, democracy and so forth. But I think if, to answer your question, I think they'll, they'll slow it down in courts. And I think at some point somebody's going to figure out a way to disrupt these big companies. They always do, you know, >>You're right. They always do >>Right. I mean, you know, the other thing John Chambers points out is that he used to be at 1 28, working for Wang. There is no guarantee that the past is prologue that because you succeeded in the past, you're going to succeed in the future. So, so that's kind of the Facebook break up big tech. I'd like to see a little bit more discussion around, you know, things like food companies and the, like >>You bring up a great point about that, that they're equally harmful in different ways. And yet they're not getting the visibility that a Facebook is getting. And maybe that's because of the number of users that it has worldwide and how many people depend on it for communication, especially in the last 18 months when it was one of the few channels we had to connect and engage >>Well. And, and the whistleblower's point, Facebook puts out this marketing narrative that, Hey, look at all this good we're doing in reality. They're all about the, the, the advertising profits. But you know, I'm not sure what laws they're breaking. They're a public company. They're, they're, they have a responsibility to shareholders. So that's, you know, to be continued. The other big news is, and the headline is banks challenge, apple pay over fees for transactions, right? In 2014, when apple came up with apple pay, all the banks lined up, oh, they had FOMO. They didn't want to miss out on this. So they signed up. Now. They don't like the fact that they have to pay apple fees. They don't like the fact that apple introduced its own credit card. They don't like the fact that they have to pay fees on monthly recurring charges on your, you know, your iTunes. >>And so we talked about this and we talk about it a lot on the cube is that, that in, in, in, in his book, seeing digital David, Michelle, or the author talked about Silicon valley broadly defined. So he's including Seattle, Microsoft, but more so Amazon, et cetera, has a dual disruption agenda. They're not only trying to disrupt horizontally the technology industry, but they're also disrupting industry. We talked about this yesterday, apple and finances. The example here, Amazon, who was a bookseller got into cloud and is in grocery and is doing content. And you're seeing these a large companies, traverse industry value chains, which have historically been very insulated right from that type of competition. And it's all because of digital and data. So it's a very, pretty fascinating trends going on. >>Well, from a financial services perspective, we've been seeing the unbundling of the banks for a while. You know, the big guys with B of A's, those folks are clearly concerned about the smaller, well, I'll say the smaller FinTech disruptors for one, but, but the non FinTech folks, the apples of the world, for example, who aren't in that industry who are now to your point, disrupting horizontally and now going after individual specific industries, ultimately I think as consumers we want, whatever is going to make our lives easier. Um, do you ever, ever, I always kind of scratch my nose when somebody doesn't take apple pay, I'm like, you don't take apple pay so easy. It's so easy to make this easy for me. >>Yeah. Yeah. So it's, it's going to be really interesting to see how this plays out. I, I do think, um, you know, it begs the question when will banks or Willbanks lose control of the payment systems. They seem to be doing that already with, with alternative forms of payment, uh, whether it's PayPal or Stripe or apple pay. And then crypto is, uh, with, with, with decentralized finance is a whole nother topic of disruption and innovation, >>Right? Well, these big legacy institutions, these organizations, and we've spoke with some of them yesterday, we're going to be speaking with some of them today. They need to be able to be agile, to transform. They have to have the right culture in order to do that. That's the big one. They have to be willing. I think an open to partner with the broader ecosystem to unlock more opportunities. If they want to be competitive and retain the trust of the clients that they've had for so long. >>I think every industry has a digital disruption scenario. We used to always use the, don't get Uber prized example Uber's coming on today, right? And, and there isn't an industry, whether it's manufacturing or retail or healthcare or, or government that isn't going to get disrupted by digital. And I think the unique piece of this is it's it's data, data, putting data at the core. That's what the big internet giants have done. That's what we're hearing. All these incumbents try to do is to put data. We heard this from Coca-Cola yesterday, we're putting data at the core of our company and what we're enabling through automation and other activities, uh, digital, you know, a company. And so, you know, can these, can these giants, these hundred plus year old giants compete? I think they can because they don't have to invent AI. They can work with companies like UI path and embed AI into their business and focused on, on what they do best. Now, of course, Google and Amazon and Facebook and Microsoft there may be going to have the best AI in the world. But I think ultimately all these companies are on a giant collision course, but the market is so huge that I think there's a lot of, >>There's a tremendous amount of opportunity. I think one of the things that was exciting about talking to one, the female CIO of Coca-Cola yesterday, a hundred plus old organization, and she came in with a very transformative, very different mindset. So when you see these, I always appreciate when I say legacy institutions like Coca-Cola or Merck who was on yesterday, blue cross blue shield who's on today, embracing change, cultural change going. We can't do things the way we used to do, because there are competitors in that review mirror who are smaller, they're more nimble, they're faster. They're going to be, they're going to take our customers away from us. We have to deliver this exceptional customer and employee experience. And Coca-Cola is a great example of one that really came in with CA brought in a disruptor in order to align digital with the CEO's thoughts and processes and organization. These are >>Highly capable companies. We heard from the head of finance at, at applied materials today. He was also coming on. I was quite, I mean, this is a applied materials is really strong company. They're talking about a 20 plus billion dollar company with $120 billion market cap. They supply semiconductor equipment and they're a critical component of the semiconductor supply chain. And we all know what's going on in semiconductors today with a huge shortage. So they're a really important company, but I was impressed with, uh, their finance leaders vision on how they're transforming the company. And it was not like, you know, 10 years out, these were not like aspirational goals. This is like 20, 19, 20, 22. Right. And, and really taking costs out of the business, driving new innovation. And, and it's, it was it's, it's refreshing to me Lisa, to see CFOs, you know, typically just bottom line finance focused on these industry transformations. Now, of course, at the end of the day, it's all about the bottom line, but they see technology as a way to get there. In fact, he put technology right in the middle of his stack. I want to ask him about that too. I actually want to challenge him a little bit on it because he had that big Hadoop elephant in the middle and this as an elephant in the room. And that picture, >>The strategy though, that applied materials had, it was very well thought out, but it was also to your point designed to create outcomes year upon year upon year. And I was looking at some of the notes. I took that in year one, alone, 274 automations in production. That's a lot, 150,000 in annual work hours automated 124 use cases they tackled in one year. >>So I want to, I want to poke at that a little bit too. And I, and I did yesterday with some guests. I feel like, well, let's see. So, um, I believe it was, uh, I forget what guests it was, but she said we don't put anything forward that doesn't hit the income statement. Do you remember that? Yes, it was Chevron because that was pushing her. I'm like, well, you're not firing people. Right. And we saw from IDC data today, only 13% of organizations are saying, or, or, or the organizations at 13% of the value was from reduction in force. And a lot of that was probably in plan anyway, and they just maybe accelerated it. So they're not getting rid of headcount, but they're counting hours saved. So that says to me, there's gotta be an normally or often CFOs say, well, it's that soft dollars because we're redeploying folks. But she said, no, it hits the income statement. So I don't, I want to push a little bit and see how they connect the dots, because if you're going to save hours, you're going to apply people to new work. And so either they're generating revenue or cutting costs somewhere. So, so there's another layer that I want to appeal to understand how that hits the income state. >>Let's talk about some of that IDC data. They announced a new white paper this morning sponsored by UI path. And I want to get your perspectives on some of the stats that they talked about. They were painting a positive picture, an optimistic picture. You know, we can't talk about automation without talking about the fear of job loss. They've been in a very optimistic picture for the actual gains over a few year period. What are your thoughts about that? Especially when we saw that stat 41% slowed hiring. >>Yeah. So, well, first of all, it's a sponsored study. So, you know, and of course the conferences, so it's going to be, be positive, but I will say this about IDC. IDC is a company I would put, you know, forest they're similar. They do sponsored research and they're credible. They don't, they, they have the answer to their audience, so they can't just out garbage. And so it has to be defensible. So I give them credit there that they won't just take whatever the vendor wants them to write and then write it. I've used to work there. And I, and I know the culture and there's a great deal of pride in being able to defend what you do. And if the answer doesn't come out, right, sorry, this is the answer. You know, you could pay a kill fee or I dunno how they handle it today. >>But, but, so my point is I think, and I know the people who did that study, many of them, and I think they're pretty credible. I, I thought by the way, you, to your 41% point. So the, the stat was 13% are gonna reduce head count, right? And then there were two in the middle and then 41% are gonna reduce or defer hiring in the future. And this to me, ties into the Erik Brynjolfsson and, and, and, uh, and, and McAfee work. Andy McAfee work from MIT who said, look, initially actually made back up. They said, look at machines, have always replaced humans. Historically this was in their book, the second machine age and what they said was, but for the first time in history, machines are replacing humans with cognitive functions. And this is sort of, we've never seen this before. It's okay. That's cool. >>And their, their research suggests that near term, this is going to be a negative economic impact, sorry, negative impact on jobs and salaries. And we've, we've generally seen this, the average salary, uh, up until recently has been flat in the United States for years and somewhere in the mid fifties. But longterm, their research shows that, and this is consistent. I think with IDC that it's going to help hiring, right? There's going to be a boost buddy, a net job creator. And there's a, there's a, there's a chasm you've got across, which is education training and skill skillsets, which Brynjolfsson and McAfee focused on things that humans can do that machines can't. And you have this long list and they revisited every year. Like they used to be robots. Couldn't walk upstairs. Well, you see robots upstairs all the time now, but it's empathy, it's creativity. It's things like that. >>Contact that humans are, are much better at than machines, uh, even, even negotiations. And, and so, so that's, those are skills. I don't know where you get those skills. Do you teach those and, you know, MBA class or, you know, there's these. So their point is there needs to be a new thought process around education, public policy, and the like, and, and look at it. You can't protect the past from the future, right? This is inevitable. And we've seen this in terms of economic activity around the world countries that try to protect, you know, a hundred percent employment and don't let competition, they tend to fall behind competitively. You know, the U S is, is not of that category. It's an open market. So I think this is inevitable. >>So a lot about upskilling yesterday, and the number of we talked with PWC about, for example, about what they're doing and a big focus on upscaling. And that was part of the IDC data that was shared this morning. For example, I'll share a stat. This was a survey of 518 people. 68% of upscaled workers had higher salaries than before. They also shared 57% of upskilled workers had higher roles and their enterprises then before. So some, again, two point it's a sponsored study, so it's going to be positive, but there, there was a lot of discussion of upskilling yesterday and the importance on that education, because to your point, we can't have one without the other. You can't give these people access to these tools and not educate them on how to use it and help them help themselves become more relevant to the organization. Get rid of the mundane tasks and be able to start focusing on more strategic business outcome, impacting processes. >>We talked yesterday about, um, I use the example of, of SAP. You, you couldn't have predicted SAP would have won the ERP wars in the early to mid 1990s, but if you could have figured out who was going to apply ERP to their businesses, you know what, you know, manufacturing companies and these global firms, you could have made a lot of money in the stock market by, by identifying those that were going to do that. And we used to say the same thing about big data, and the reason I'm bringing all this up is, you know, the conversations with PWC, Deloitte and others. This is a huge automation, a huge services opportunity. Now, I think the difference between this and the big data era, which is really driven by Hadoop is it was big data was so complicated and you had a lack of data scientists. >>So you had to hire these services firms to come in and fill those gaps. I think this is an enormous services opportunity with automation, but it's not because the software is hard to get to work. It's all around the organizational processes, rethinking those as people process technology, it's about the people in the process, whereas Hadoop and the big data era, it was all about the tech and they would celebrate, Hey, this stuff works great. There are very few companies really made it through that knothole to dominate as we've seen with the big internet giants. So you're seeing all these big services companies playing in this market because as I often say, they like to eat at the trough. I know it's kind of a pejorative, but it's true. So it's huge, huge market, but I'm more optimistic about the outcomes for a broader audience with automation than I was with, you know, big data slash Hadoop, because I think the software as much, as much more adoptable, easier to use, and you've got the cloud and it's just a whole different ball game. >>That's certainly what we heard yesterday from Chevron about the ease of use and that you should be able to see results and returns very quickly. And that's something too that UI path talks about. And a lot of their marketing materials, they have a 96, 90 7% retention rate. They've done a great job building their existing customers land and expand as we talked about yesterday, a great use case for that, but they've done so by making things easy, but hearing that articulated through the voice of their customers, fantastic validation. >>So, you know, the cube is like a little, it's like a interesting tip of the spirits, like a probe. And I will tell you when I, when we first started doing the cube and the early part of the last decade, there were three companies that stood out. It was Splunk service now and Tableau. And the reason they stood out is because they were able to get customers to talk about how great they were. And the light bulb went off for us. We were like, wow, these are three companies to watch. You know, I would tell all my wall street friends, Hey, watch these companies. Yeah. And now you see, you know, with Frank Slootman at snowflake, the war, the cat's out of the bag, everybody knows it's there. And they're expecting, you know, great things. The stock is so priced to perfection. You could argue, it's overpriced. >>The reason I'm bringing this up is in terms of customer loyalty and affinity and customer love. You're getting it here. Absolutely this ecosystem. And the reason I bring that up is because there's a lot of questions in the, in the event last night, it was walking around. I saw a couple of wall street guys who came up to me and said, Hey, I read your stuff. It was good. Let's, let's chat. And there's a lot of skepticism on, on wall street right now about this company. Right? And to me, that's, that's good news for you. Investors who want to do some research, because the words may be not out. You know, they, they, they gotta prove themselves here. And to me, the proof is in the customer and the lifetime value of that customer. So, you know, again, we don't give stock advice. We, we kind of give fundamental observations, but this stock, I think it's trading just about 50. >>Now. I don't think it's going to go to 30, unless the market just tanks. It could have some, you know, if that happens, okay, everything will go down. But I actually think, even though this is a richly priced stock, I think the future of this company is very bright. Obviously, if they continue to execute and we're going to hear from the CEO, right? People don't know Daniel, Denise, right? They're like, who is this guy? You know, he started this company and he's from Eastern Europe. And we know he's never have run a public company before, so they're not diving all in, you know? And so that to me is something that really pay attention to, >>And we can unpack that with him later today. And we've got some great customers on the program. You mentioned Uber's here. Spotify is here, applied materials. I feel like I'm announcing something on Saturday night. Live Uber's here. Spotify is here. All right, Dave, looking forward to a great action packed today. We're going to dig more into this and let's get going. Shall we let's do it. All right. For David Dante, I'm Lisa Martin. This is the cube live in Las Vegas. At the Bellagio. We are coming to you presenting UI path forward for come back right away. Our first guest comes up in just a second.

Published Date : Oct 6 2021

SUMMARY :

UI path forward for brought to you by UI path. Live from the Bellagio in Las Vegas. And I think she feels betrayed because she's now saying, So there's sort of, you know, the senators are trying that night. There's that website that we've gone to and you look at all the data Google has and you kind of freak out. And the vast majority, I think of its users, And the point was made if you have 600,000 I get the billionaires and I get that, you know, the Mo I'm all for billionaires paying more taxes. And I think that's a big risk to the, to their franchise and maybe Zuckerberg doesn't care. What do you think would happen with Amazon, Google, apple, some of the other big giants. And I think if you look at the history of the us You know, if companies are breaking the law, they have to be held accountable. And I believe in, you know, democracy and so forth. They always do I mean, you know, the other thing John Chambers points out is that he used to be at 1 28, And maybe that's because of the number of users that it has worldwide and how many They don't like the fact that they have to pay apple fees. And so we talked about this and we talk about it a lot on the cube is that, that in, You know, the big guys with B of A's, those folks are clearly concerned about the smaller, I, I do think, um, you know, it begs the question when will I think an open to partner and other activities, uh, digital, you know, a company. And Coca-Cola is a great example of one that really came in with CA Now, of course, at the end of the day, it's all about the bottom line, but they see technology as And I was looking at some of the notes. And a lot of that was probably in plan anyway, And I want to get your perspectives on some of the stats that they talked about. And I, and I know the culture and there's a great deal of pride in being And this to me, ties into the Erik Brynjolfsson And their, their research suggests that near term, this is going to be a negative economic activity around the world countries that try to protect, you know, a hundred percent employment and don't let competition, Get rid of the mundane tasks and be able to start focusing on more strategic business outcome, data, and the reason I'm bringing all this up is, you know, the conversations with PWC, and the big data era, it was all about the tech and they would celebrate, That's certainly what we heard yesterday from Chevron about the ease of use and that you should be able to see results and returns very And I will tell you when I, when we first started doing the cube and the early part And the reason I bring that up is because there's a lot of questions in the, in the event last night, And so that to me is something that really pay We are coming to you presenting UI path forward for come back right away.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave ShacochisPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VelantePERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Francis HaugenPERSON

0.99+

Justin WarrenPERSON

0.99+

David DantePERSON

0.99+

Ken RingdahlPERSON

0.99+

PWCORGANIZATION

0.99+

CenturylinkORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bill BelichikPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Peter BurrisPERSON

0.99+

DeloitteORGANIZATION

0.99+

Frank SlootmanPERSON

0.99+

AndyPERSON

0.99+

Coca-ColaORGANIZATION

0.99+

Tom BradyPERSON

0.99+

appleORGANIZATION

0.99+

David ShacochisPERSON

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Don JohnsonPERSON

0.99+

CelticsORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

MerckORGANIZATION

0.99+

KenPERSON

0.99+

BerniePERSON

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

30 percentQUANTITY

0.99+

CelticORGANIZATION

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

Robert KraftPERSON

0.99+

John ChambersPERSON

0.99+

Silicon Angle MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

John WallsPERSON

0.99+

$120 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

January 6thDATE

0.99+

2007DATE

0.99+

DanielPERSON

0.99+

Andy McAfeePERSON

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

ClevelandORGANIZATION

0.99+

CavsORGANIZATION

0.99+

BrandonPERSON

0.99+

2014DATE

0.99+

Breaking Analysis: How Cisco can win cloud's 'Game of Thrones'


 

>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE in ETR. This is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> Cisco is a company at the crossroads. It's transitioning from a high margin hardware business to a software subscription-based model, which also should be high margin through both organic moves and targeted acquisitions. It's doing so in the context of massive macro shifts to digital in the cloud. We believe Cisco's dominant position in networking combined with a large market opportunity and a strong track record of earning customer trust, put the company in a good position to capitalize on cloud momentum. However, there are clear challenges ahead for Cisco, not the least of which is the growing complexity of its portfolio, a large legacy business, and the mandate to maintain its higher profitability profile as it transitions into a new business model. Hello and welcome to this week's Wiki-bond cube insights powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis, we welcome in Zeus Kerravala, who's the founder and principal analyst at ZK Research, long time Cisco watcher who together with me crafted the premise of today's session. Zeus, great to see you welcome to the program. >> Thanks Dave. It's always a pleasure to be with you guys. >> Okay, here's what we're going to talk about today, set the agenda. The catalyst for this session, Zeus and I attended Cisco's financial analyst day. We received a day and a half of firehose presentations, drill downs, interactions, Q and A with Cisco execs and one key customer. So we're going to share our takeaways from these sessions and add our additional thoughts. Now, in particular, we're going to talk about Cisco's TAM, its transformation to a subscription-based model, and how we see that evolving. As always, we're going to bring in some ETR spending data for context and get Zeus' take on what that tells us. And we'll end with a summary of Cisco's cloud strategy and outlook for how it could win in the cloud. So let's talk about Cisco's sort of structure and TAM opportunities. First, Zeus, Cisco has four main lines of business where it's organized it's executives around sort of four product areas. And it's got a large service component as well. Network equipment, SP routing, data center, collaboration that security, and as I say services, that's not necessarily how it's going to market, but that's kind of the way it organizes its ELT, its executive leadership team. >> Yeah, the in fact, the ELT has been organized around those products, as you said. It used to report to the street three product segments, infrastructure platforms, which was by far the biggest, it was all their networking equipment, then applications, and then security. Now it's moved to five new segments, secure agile networks, hybrid work, end to end security, internet for the future and optimized app experiences. And I think what Cisco's trying to do is align their, the way they report along the lines of the way customers buy. 'Cause I think before, you know, they had a very simplistic model before. It was just infrastructure, apps, and security. The ELT is organized around product roadmap and the product innovation, but that's not necessarily the way customers purchase things and so, purchase things so I think they've tried to change things a little bit there. When you look at those segments though, you know, by, it's interesting. They're all big, right? So, by far the biggest distilled networking, which is almost a hundred billion dollar TAM as they reported and they have it growing a about a 9% CAGR as reported by other analyst firms. And when you think about how mature networking is Dave, the fact that that's still growing at high single digit CAGR is still pretty remarkable. So I think that's one of those things that, you know, watchers of Cisco historically have been calling for the network to be commoditized for decades. For as long as I've been watching Cisco, we've been, people have been waiting for the network to be commoditized. My thesis has always been, if you can drive enough innovation into things, you can stave off commoditization and that's what they've done. But that's really the anchor for them to sell all their other products, some of which are higher margin, some which are a little bit sore, but they're all good high margin businesses to your point. >> Awesome. We're going to dig into that. So, so they flattened the organization when Geckler left. You've got Todd Nightingale, Jonathan Davidson, Liz Centoni, and Jeetu Patel who we heard from and we'll make some comments on what we heard from them. One of the big takeaways at the financial analysts meeting was on the TAM, as you just mentioned. Liz Centoni who also is heavily involved in strategy and the CFO Scott Herren, showed this slide, which speaks to the company's TAM and the organizational structure that you were just talking about. So the big message was that Cisco has got a large and growing market, you know, no shortage of available market. Somewhere between eight and 900 billion, depending on which of the slides you pull out of the deck. And ironically Zeus, when you look at the current markets number here on the right hand side of this slide, 260 billion, it just about matches the company's market cap. Maybe an interesting coincidence, but at any rate, what was your takeaway from this data? >> Well, I think, you know, the big takeaway from the data is there's still a lot of room ahead for Cisco to grow, right? Again, this is a, it's a company that I think most people would put in the camp of legacy IT vendor, just because of how long they've been around. But they have done a very good job of staving off innovation. And part of that is just these markets that they play in continue to grow and they continue to have challenges that they can solve. I think one of the things Cisco has done though, since the arrival of Chuck Robbins, is they don't fight these trends anymore, Dave. I know prior to Chuck's arrival, they really fought the tide of software defined networking and you know, trends like that, and even cloud to some extent. And I remember one of the first meetings I had with Chuck, I asked him about that and he said that Cisco will never do that again. That under his watch, if customers are going through a market transition, Cisco wants to lead them through it, not try and hold them back. And I think for that reason, they're able to look at, all of those trends and try and take a leadership position in them, even though you might look at some of those and feel that some of them might be detrimental to Cisco's business in the short term. So something like software defined WANs, which you would throw into secure agile networks, certainly doesn't, may not carry the same kind of RPOs and margins with it that their traditional routers did, but ultimately customers are going to buy it and Cisco would like to be the ones to sell it to them. >> You know, you bring up a great point. This industry is littered, there's a graveyard of executives who fought the trend. Many people, some people remember Ken Olson of Digital Equipment Corporation. "Unix is snake oil," is what he said. IBM mainframe guys said, "PCs are a toy." And of course the history, they were the wrong side of history. The other big takeaway was the shift to software in subscription. They really made a big point of this. Here's a chart Cisco showed a couple of times to make the point that it's one of the largest software companies in the world. You know, in the top 10. They also made the point that Chuck Robbins, when he joined in 2015, and since that time, it's nearly 4x'ed it's subscription software revenue, and roughly doubled its software sales. And it now has an RPO, remaining performance obligations, that exceeds 30 billion. And it's committing to grow its subscription business in the forward-looking statements by 15 to 17% CAGR through 25, which would imply about a doubling of these, the blue lines. Zeus, it's unclear if that forward-looking forecast is just software. I presume it includes some services, but as Herren pointed out, over time, these services will be bundled into the product revenue, same way SAS companies do it. But the point is Cisco is committed, like many of their peers, to moving to an ARR model. But please, share your thoughts on Cisco's move to software subscriptions and how you see the future of consumption-based pricing. >> Yeah, this has been a big shift for Cisco, obviously. It's one that's highly disruptive. It's one that I know gave their partners a lot of angst for a long time because when you sell things upfront, you get a big check for selling that, right? And when you sell things in a subscription model, you get a much smaller check for a number of months over the period of the contract. It also changes the way you deal with the customer. When you sell a one-time product, you basically wipe your hands. You come back in three or four years and say, "it's time to upgrade." When you sell a subscription, now, the one thing that I've tried to talk to Cisco and its partners about is customers don't renew things they don't use. And so it becomes incumbent on the partner, it becomes incumbent upon Cisco to make sure that things that the customer is subscribing to, that they do use. And so Cisco's had to create a customer success organization. They've had to help their partners create those customer success organizations. So it's really changed the model. And Cisco not only made the shift, they've done it faster than they actually had originally forecast. So during the financial analyst day, they actually touted their execution on software, noting that it hit it's 30% revenue as percent of total target well before it was supposed to, it's actually exceeded its targets. And now it's looking to increase that to, it actually raised its guidance in this area a little bit by a few percentage points, looking out over the next few years. And so it's moved to the subscription model, Dave, the thing that you brought up, which I do see as somewhat of a challenge is the shift to consumption-based pricing. So subscription is one thing in that I write you a check every month for the same amount. When I go to the consumption-based pricing, that's easy to do for cloud services, things like WebEx or Duo or, you know, CloudLock, some of the security products. That that shift should be relatively simple. If customers want to buy it that way. It's unclear as to how you do that when you're selling on-prem equipment with the software add-on to it because in that case, you have to put metering technology in to understand how much they're using. You have to have a minimum baseline to start with. They've done it in some respects. The old HCS product that they sold, the Telcos, actually was sold with a minimum commit and then they tacked on a utilization on top of that. So maybe they move into that kind of model. But I know it's something that they've, they get asked about a lot. I know they're still thinking about it, but it's something that I believe is coming and it's going to come pretty fast. >> I want to pick up on that because I think, you know, they made the point that we're one of the top 10 software companies in the world. It's very difficult for hardware companies to make the transition to software. You know, HP couldn't do it. >> Well, no one's done it. >> Well, IBM has kind of done it, but they really struggle. It's kind of this mishmash of tooling and software products that aren't really well-integrated. But, I would say this, everybody now, Cisco, Dell, HPE with GreenLake, Lenovo, pretty much all the traditional hardware players are trying to move to an as a service model or at least for a portion of their business. HPE's all in, Dell transitioning. And for the most part, I would make the following observation. And I'd love to get your thoughts on this. They're pretty much following a SAS like model, which in my view is outdated and kind of flawed from a customer standpoint. All these guys say, "Hey, we're doing this because "this is what the customers want." I think the cloud is really a true consumption based model. And if you look at modern SAS companies, a lot of the startups, they're moving to a consumption based model. You see that with Snowflake, you see that with Stripe. Now they will offer incentives. But most of the traditional enterprise players, they're saying, "Okay, pay us upfront, "commit to some base level. "If you go over it, you know, "we'll charge you for it. "If you go under it, you're still going to pay "for that base level." So it's not true consumption base. It's not really necessarily the customer's best interest. So that's, I think there's some learnings there that are going to have to play out. >> Yeah, the reason customers are shying away from that SAS type model, I think during the pandemic, the one thing we learned, Dave, is that the business will ebb and flow greatly from month to month sometimes. And I was talking with somebody that worked for one of the big hotel chains, and she was telling me that what their CRM providers, she wouldn't tell me who it was, except said it rhymed with Shmalesforce, that their utilization of it went from, you know, from a nice steady level to spiking really high when customers started calling in to cancel hotel rooms. And then it dropped down to almost nothing as we went through that period of stay at home. And now it's risen back up. And so for her, she wanted to move to a consumption-based model because what happens otherwise is you wind up buying for peak utilization, your software subscriptions go largely underutilized the majority of the year, and you wind up paying, you know, a lot more than you need to. If you go to more of a true consumption model, it's harder to model out from a financial perspective 'cause there's a lot of ebbs and flows in the business, but over a longer period of time, it's more cost-effective, right? And so the, again, what the pandemic taught us was we don't really know what we're going to need from a consumption standpoint, you know, nevermind a year from now, maybe even six months from now. And consumption just creates a lot more flexibility and agility. You can scale up, you can scale down. You can bring in users, you can take out users, you can add consultants, things like that. And it just, it's much more aligned with the way businesses are run today. >> Yeah, churn is a silent killer of a software company. And so there's retention is the key here. So again, I think there's lots of learning. Let's put Cisco into context with some of its peers. So this chart we developed compares five companies to Cisco. Core Dell, meaning Dell, without VMware. VMware, HPE, IBM, we've put an AWS, and then Cisco as, IBM, AWS and Cisco is the integrated plays. So the chart shows the latest quarterly revenue multiplied by four to get a run rate, a three-year growth outlook, gross margin percentage, market cap, and revenue multiple. And the key points here are that one, Cisco has got a pretty awesome business model. It's got 60% gross margin, strong operating margins, not shown here, but in the mid twenties, 25%. It's got a higher growth rate than most of its peers. And as such, a much better, multiple than say, for instance, Core Dell gets 33 cents on the revenue dollar. HPE is double that. IBM's below two X. Cisco's revenue multiple rivals VMware, which is a pure software company. Now in a large part that's because VMware stock took a hit recently, but still the point is obvious. Cisco's got a great business. Now for context, we've added AWS, which blows away any company on this chart. We've inferred a market cap of nearly 600 billion, which frankly is conservative at a 10 X revenue multiple given it's inferred margins and growth rate. Now Zeus, if AWS were a separate company, it could have a market cap that approached 800 billion in my view. But what does this data tell you? >> Well, it just tells me that Cisco continues to be a very well-run company that has staved off commoditization, despite the calling for it for years. And I think the big lesson, and I've talked to financial analysts about this over the years, is that if, I don't really believe anything in this world is a commodity, Dave. I think even when Cisco went to the server market, if you remember back then, they created a new way of handling memory management. They were getting well above average margins for service, albeit less than Cisco's network margins, but still above average for server margins. And so I think if you can continue to innovate, you will see the margin stay where they are. You will see customers continue to buy and refresh. And I think one of the challenges Cisco's had in the past, and this is where the subscription business will help, is getting customers to stay with the latest and greatest. Prior to this refresh of network equipment, some of the stuff that I've seen in the fields, 10, 15 years old, once you move to that sell me a box and then tack on the subscription revenue that you pay month by month, you do drive more consistent refresh. Think about the way you just handle your own mobile phone. If you had to go pay, you know, a thousand dollars every three years, you might not do it at that three-year cycle. If you pay 40 bucks a month, every time there's a new phone, you're going to take it, right? So I think Cisco is able to drive greater, better refresh, keep their customers current, keep the features in there. And we've seen that with a lot of the new products. The new Cat 9,000, some of the new service provider products, the new wifi products, they've all done very well. In fact, they've all outpaced their previous generation products as far as growth rate goes. And so I think that is a testament to the way they've run the business. But I do think when people bucket Cisco in with HP and Dell, and I understand why they do, their businesses were similar at one time, it's really not a true comparison anymore. I think Cisco has completely changed their business and they're not trying to commoditize markets, they're trying to drive innovation and keep the margins up, where I think HP and Dell tend to really compete on price versus innovation. >> Well, and we are going to get to this point about the tailwinds and headwinds and cloud, and how Cisco to do it. But, to your point about, you know, the cell phone analogy. To the extent that Cisco can make that seamless for customers could hide that underlying complexity, that's going to be critical for the cloud. Now, but before we get there, I want to talk about one of the reasons why Cisco such a high multiple, and has been able to preserve its margins, to your point, not being commoditized. And it's been able to grow both organically, but also has a strong history of M and A. It's this chart shows a dominant position in core networking. So this shows, so ETR data within the Fortune 500. It plots companies in the ETR taxonomy in two dimensions, net score on the vertical axis, which is a measure of spending velocity, and market share on the horizontal axis, which is a measure of presence in the survey. It's not like IDC market share, it's mentioned market share if you will. The point is Cisco is far and away the most pervasive player in the market, it's generally held its dominant position. Although, it's been under pressure in the last few years in core networking, but it retains or maintains a very respectable net score and consistently performs well for such a large company. Zeus, anything you'd add with respect to Cisco's core networking business? >> Yeah, it's maintained a dominant network position historically. I think part of because it drives good products, but also because the competitive landscape, historically has been pretty weak, right? We saw companies like 3Com and Nortel who aren't around anymore. It'll be interesting to see moving forward now that companies like VMware are involved in networking. AWS is interested in networking. Arista is a much stronger company. You know, Juniper bought Mist and is in better position. Even Extreme Networks who most people thought was dead a few years ago has made a number of acquisitions and is now a billion dollar company. So while Cisco has done a great job of execution, they've done a great job on the innovation side, their competitive landscape, looking out over the next five years, I think is going to be more difficult than it has been over the previous five years. And largely, Dave, I think that's good for Cisco. I think whenever Cisco's pressed a little bit from competition, they tend to step on the innovation gas a little bit more. And I look back and even just the transition when VMware bought Nicira, that got Cisco's SDN business into gear, like nothing else could have, right? So competition for that company, they always seem to respond well to it. >> So, let's break down Cisco's net score a little bit. Explain why the company has been able to hold its spending momentum despite its large size. This will give you a little insight to the survey. So this chart shows the granular components of net score. The lime green is new adoptions to Cisco. The forest green is spending more than 6%. The gray is flat plus or minus 5%. The pink is spending drops by more than 5%. And the red is we're chucking the platform, we're getting off. And Cisco's overall net score here is 25%, which for a company of its size speaks to the relationships that it has with customers. It's of course got a fat middle in the gray area, like all sort of large established companies. But very low defections as well, it's got low new adoptions. But very respectable. So that is background, Zeus. Let's look at spending momentum over time across Cisco's portfolio. So this chart shows Cisco's net score by that methodology within the ETR taxonomy for Cisco over three survey periods. And what jumps out is Meraki on the left, very strong. Virtualization business, its core networking, analytics and security, all showing upward momentum. AppD is a little bit concerning, but that could be related to Cisco's sort of pivot to full stack observability. So maybe AppD is being bundled there. Although some practitioners have cited to us some concerns in that space. And then WebEx at the end of the chart, it's showing some relative strength, but not that high. Zeus, maybe you could comment on Meraki and any other takeaways across the portfolio. >> Yeah, Meraki has proven to be an excellent acquisition for Cisco. In fact, you might, I think it's arguable to say it's its best acquisition in history going all the way back to camp Kalpana and Grand Junction, the ones that brought up catalyst switches. So, in fact, I think Meraki's revenue might be larger than security now. So, that shows you the momentum it has. I think one of the lessons it brought to Cisco was that simpler is better, sometimes. I think when they first bought Meraki, the way Meraki's deployed, it's very easy to set up. There's a lot of engineering work though that goes into making a product simple to use. And I think a lot of Cisco engineers historically looked at Meraki as, that's a little bit of a toy. It's meant for small businesses, things like that, but it's not for enterprise. But, Rocky's done a nice job of expanding the portfolio, of leveraging the cloud for analytics and showing you a lot of things that you wouldn't necessarily get from traditional networking equipment. And one of the things that I was really delighted to see was when they put Todd Nightingale in charge of all the networking business, because that showed to me that Chuck Robbins understood that the things Meraki were doing were right and they infuse a little bit of Meraki into the rest of the company. You know, that's certainly a good thing. The other areas that you showed on the chart, not really a surprise, Dave. When you think of the shift hybrid work and you think of the, some of the other transitions going on, I think you would expect to see the server business in decline, the storage business, you know, maybe in a little bit of decline, just because people aren't building out data centers. Where the other ones are related more to hybrid working, hybrid cloud, things like that. So it is what you would expect. The WebEx one was interesting too, because it did show somewhat of a dip and then a rise. And I think that's indicative of what we've seen in the collaboration space since the pandemic came about. Companies like Zoom and RingCentral really got a lot of the headlines. Again, when you, the comment I made on competition, Cisco got caught a little bit flat-footed, they've caught up in features and now they really stepped on the gas there. Chuck joked that he gave the WebEx team a bit of a blank check to go do what it had to do. And I don't think that was a joke. I think he actually did that because they've added more features into WebEx in the last year then I think they did the previous five years before that. >> Well, let's just drill into video conferencing real quick here, if we could. Here's that two dimensional view, again, showing net score against market share or pervasiveness of mentions, and you can see Microsoft Teams in the upper right. I mean, it's off the chart, literally. Zoom's well ahead of Cisco in terms of, you know, mentions presence. And that could be a spate of freemium, you know, but it's basically a three horse race in this game. And Cisco, I don't think is trying to take Zoom head on, rather it seems to be making WebEx a core part of its broader collaboration agenda. But Zeus, maybe you could comment. >> Well, it's all coming together, right? So, it's hard to decouple calling from video from meetings. All of the vendors, including Teams, are going after the hybrid work experience. And if you believe the future is hybrid and not just work from home, then Cisco does have a pretty interesting advantage because it's the only one that makes its own end points, where Teams and Zoom doesn't. And so that end to end experience it can deliver. The Microsoft Teams one's interesting because that product, frankly, when you talk to users, it doesn't have a great user score, like as far as user satisfaction goes, but the one thing Microsoft has done a very good job of is bundling it in to the Office365 licenses, making it very easy for IT to deploy. Zoom is a little bit in the middle where they've appealed to the users. They've done a better job of appealing to IT, but there is a, there is a battleground now going on where video's not just video. It includes calling, includes meetings, includes room systems now, and I think this hybrid work friend is going to change the way we think about these meeting tools. >> Now we'd be remiss if we didn't spend a moment talking about security as a key part of Cisco's business. And we have a graphic on this same kind of X, Y. And it's been, we've seen several quarters of growth. Although, the last quarter security growth was in the low single digits, but Cisco is a major player in security. And this X, Y graph shows, they've got both a large presence and a solid spending momentum. Not nearly as much momentum as Okta or Zscaler or a CrowdStrike and some of the smaller companies, but they're, these guys are on a rocket ship, but others that we featured in these episodes, but much more than respectable for Cisco. And security is critical to the strategy. It's a big part of the subscriber base. And the last thing, Zeus, I'll say about Cisco made the point in analyst day, that this market is crowded. You can see that in this chart. And their goal is to simplify this picture and make it easier for customers to secure their data and apps. But that's not easy, Zeus. What are your thoughts on Cisco's security opportunities? >> Yeah, I've been waiting for Cisco go to break up in security a little more than it has. I do think, I was talking with a CSO the other day, Dave, that said to me he's starting to understand that you don't have to have best of breed everywhere to have best in class threat protection. In fact, there's a lot of buyers now will tell you that if you try and have best of breed everywhere, it actually creates a negative when it comes to threat protection because keeping all the policies and things up to date is very, very difficult. And so the industry is moving more to a platform model, right? Now, the challenge for Cisco is how do you get that, the customer to think of the network as part of the platform? Because while the platform model, I think, is starting to gain traction, FloridaNet, Palo Alto, even McAfee, companies like that also have their own version of a security platform. And if you look at the financial performance of companies like FloridaNet and Palo Alto over the past, you know, over the past couple of years, they've been through the roof, right? And so I think an interesting and unique challenge for Cisco is can they convince the security buyer that the network is as important a part of that platform as any other component? If they can do that, I think they can break away from the pack. If not, then they'll stay mixed in with those, you know, Palo, FloridaNet, Checkpoint, and, you know, and Cisco, in that mix. But I do think that may present their single biggest needle moving opportunity just because of how big the security TAM is, and the fact that there is no de facto leader in security today. If they could gain the same kind of position in security as they have a networking, who, I mean, that would move the needle like no other market would. >> Yeah, it's really interesting that they're coming at security, obviously from a position of networking strength. You've got, to your point, you've got best of breed, Okta in identity, you got CrowdStrike in endpoint, Zscaler in cloud security. They're all growing like crazy. And you got Cisco and you know, Palo Alto, CSOs tell us they want to work with Palo Alto because they're the thought leader and they're obviously a major player here. You mentioned FloridaNet, there's a zillion others. We could talk all day about security. But let's bring it back to cloud. We've talked about a number of the piece in Cisco's portfolio, and we haven't really spent any time on full stack observability, which is a big push for Cisco with AppD, Intersight and the ThousandEyes acquisition. And that plays into this equation. But my take, Zeus, is Cisco has a number of cloud knobs that it can turn, it sells core networking equipment to hyperscalers. It can be the abstraction layer to connect on-prem to the cloud and hybrid and across clouds. And it's in a good position with Telcos too, to go after the 5G. But let's use this chart to talk about Cisco's cloud prospects. It's an ETR cut of the cloud customer spending. So we cut it by cloud customers. And they're are, I don't know, 800 or so in the survey. And then looking at various companies performance within that cut. So these are companies that compete, or in the case of HashiCorp, partner with Cisco at some level. Let me just set this up and get your take. So the insert on the chart by the way shows the raw data that positions each dot, the net score and the shared n, i.e. the number of accounts in the survey that responded. The key points, first of all, Azure and AWS, dominant players in cloud. GCP is a distant third. We've reported on that a lot. Not only are these two companies big, they have spending momentum on their platforms. They're growing, they are on that flywheel. Second point, VMware and Cisco are very prominent. They have huge customer bases. And while they're often on a collision course, there's lots of room in cloud for multiple players. When we plotted some other Cisco properties like AppD and Meraki, which as we said, is strong. And then for context, we've placed Dell, HPE, Aruba, IBM and Oracle. And also VMware cloud and AWS, which is notable on its elevation. And as I say, we've added HashiCorp because they're critical partner of Cisco and it's a multi-cloud play. Okay, Zeus, there's the setup. What does Cisco have to do to make the cloud a tailwind? Let's talk about strategy, tailwinds, headwinds, competition, and bottom line it for us. >> Yeah, well, I do think, well, I talked about security being the biggest needle mover for Cisco, I think its biggest challenge is convincing Wall Street in particular, that the cloud is a tailwind. I think if you look at the companies with the really high multiples to their stock, Dave, they're all ones where they're viewed as, they go along with the cloud ride, Right? So the, if you can associate yourself with the cloud and then people believe that the cloud is going to, more cloud equals more business, that obviously creates a better multiple because the cloud has almost infinite potential ahead of it. Now with respect to Cisco, I do think cloud has presented somewhat of a double-edged sword for Cisco. I don't believe the current consumption model for cloud is really a tailwind for Cisco, not really a headwind, but it doesn't really change Cisco's business. But I do think the very definition of cloud is changing before our eyes, Dave. And it's shifting away from centralized clouds. If you think of the way customers bought cloud before, it might have used AWS, it might've used Azure, but it really, that's not really multi-cloud, it's just multiple clouds in which I put things in these centralized resources. It's shifting more to this concept of distributed cloud in which a single application can be built using resources from your private cloud, for AWS, from Azure, from Edge locations, all the cloud providers have built their portfolios to support this concept of distributed cloud and what becomes important there, is a highly agile dynamic network. And in that case with distributed cloud, that is a tailwind for Cisco because now the network is that resource that ties all those distributed cloud components together. Now the network itself has to change. It needs to become a lot more agile and microservices and container friendly itself so I can spin up resources and, you know, in an Edge location, as fast as I can on-prem and things like that. But I do think it creates another wave of innovation and networking, and in that case, I think it does act as a tailwind for Cisco, aside from just the work it's done with the web scalers, you know, those types of companies. So, but I do think that Cisco needs to rethink its delivery model on network services somewhat to take advantage of that. >> At the analyst meeting, Cisco made the point that it does sell to the hyperscalers. It talked about the top six hyperscalers. You know, you had mentioned to me, maybe IBM and Oracle were in there. I always talk about four hyperscalers and only four, but that's fine. Here's my question. Practitioners have told me, buyers have told me, the more money and more workloads I put in the cloud, the less I spend with Cisco. Now, even though that might be Cisco gear powering those clouds, do you see that as a potential threat in that they don't own that relationship anymore and value will confer to the cloud players? >> Yeah, that's, I've heard that too. And I don't, I believe that's true when it comes to general purpose compute. You're probably not buying as many UCS servers and things like that because you are putting them in the cloud. But I do think you do need a refresh the network. I think the network becomes a very important role, plays a very important role there. The variant, the really interesting trend will be, what is your WAM look like? Do you have thousands of workers scattered all over the place, or do you just have a few centralized locations? So I think also, you know, Cisco will wind up providing connectivity within the cloud. If you think of the transition we've seen in other industries, Dave, as far as cloud goes, you think of, you know, F5, a company like that. People thought that AWS would commoditize F5's business because AWS provides their own load balancers, right? But what AWS provides is a very basic, very basic functionality and then use F5's virtual edition or a cloud edition for a lot of the advanced capabilities. And I think you'll see the same thing with the cloud that customers will start buying versions of Cisco that go in the cloud to drive a lot of those advanced capabilities that only Cisco delivers. And so I think you wind up buying more Cisco over time, although the per unit price of what you buy might be a little bit lower. If that makes sense here. >> It does, I think it makes a lot of sense and that fits into the cloud model. You know, you bring up a good point, the conversation with the customer was Rakuten. And that individual was essentially sharing with us, somebody was asking, one of the analysts was asking, "Well, what about the cloud guys? "Aren't they going to really threaten the whole Telco "industry and disrupt it?" And his point was, "Look at, this stuff is not trivial." So to your point, you know, maybe they'll provide some basic functionality. Kind of like they do in a lot of different areas. Data protection is another good example. Security is another good example. Where there's plenty of room for partners, competitors, of on-prem players to add value. And I've always said, "Look, the opportunity "is the cloud players spend 100 billion dollars a year "on CapEx." It's a gift to companies like Cisco who can build an abstraction layer that connects on-prem, cloud for hybrid, across clouds, out to the edge, and really be that layer that is that layer that takes advantage of cloud native, but also delivers that experience, I don't want to use the word seamlessly, but that experience across those clouds as the cloud expands. And that's fundamentally Cisco's cloud strategy, isn't it? >> Oh yeah. And I think people have underestimated over the years, how hard it is to build good networking products. Anybody can go get some silicon and build a product to connect two things together. The question is, can you do it at scale? Can you do it securely? And lots of companies have tried to commoditize networking, you know, White Boxes was looked at as the existential threat to Cisco. Huawei was looked at as the big threat to Cisco. And all of those have kind of come and gone because building high quality network equipment that scales is tough. And it's tougher than most people realize. And your other point on the cloud providers as well, they will provide a basic level of functionality. You know, AWS network equipment doesn't work in Azure. And Azure stuff doesn't work in Google, and Google doesn't work in AWS. And so you do need a third party to come in and act as almost the cloud middleware that can connect all those things together with a consistent set of policies. And that's what Cisco does really well. They did that, you know back when they were founded with routing protocols and you can think this is just an extension of what they're doing just up at the cloud layer. >> Excellent. Okay, Zeus, we're going to leave it there. Thanks to my guest today, Zeus Kerravala. Great analysis as always. Would love to have you back. Check out ZKresearch.com to reach him. Thank you again. >> Thank you, Dave. >> Now, remember I publish each week on Wikibond.com and siliconangle.com. All these episodes are available as podcasts, just search "Braking Analysis" podcast, and you can connect on Twitter at DVallante or email me David.Vallante@siliconangle.com. Thanks for the comments on LinkedIn. Check out etr.plus for all the survey action. This is Dave Vallante for theCUBE insights powered by ETR. Be well and we'll see you next time. (light music)

Published Date : Sep 18 2021

SUMMARY :

bringing you data-driven and the mandate to maintain to be with you guys. but that's kind of the for the network to be One of the big takeaways at the ones to sell it to them. And of course the history, is the shift to consumption-based pricing. companies in the world. a lot of the startups, they're moving Dave, is that the business And the key points here are that one, Think about the way you just of the reasons why Cisco I think is going to be more And the red is we're that the things Meraki I mean, it's off the chart, literally. And so that end to end And the last thing, Zeus, the customer to think It's an ETR cut of the Now the network itself has to change. that it does sell to the hyperscalers. that go in the cloud to and that fits into the cloud model. as the existential threat to Cisco. Would love to have you back. Thanks for the comments on LinkedIn.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Liz CentoniPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jonathan DavidsonPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

2015DATE

0.99+

Jeetu PatelPERSON

0.99+

LenovoORGANIZATION

0.99+

TelcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

RingCentralORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Ken OlsonPERSON

0.99+

Dave VallantePERSON

0.99+

McAfeeORGANIZATION

0.99+

ArubaORGANIZATION

0.99+

HPORGANIZATION

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

HuaweiORGANIZATION

0.99+

ZK ResearchORGANIZATION

0.99+

Erez Berkner, Lumigo & Kevin O'Neill, Flex | AWS Startup Showcase


 

(upbeat music) >> Welcome to theCUBE and our Q3 AWS Startup Showcase. I'm Lisa Martin. I've got two guests here with me, Erez Berkner is back, the Co-Founder and CEO of Lumigo. Hey, Erez, good to see you. >> Hey, Lisa, great to be here again. >> And Kevin O'Neill, the CTO at Flex is here as well. Kevin, welcome. >> Hi, Lisa, nice to meet you. >> Likewise, we're going to give the audience an overview of Lumigo and Flex. Let's go ahead, Erez, and start with you. Talk to us about Lumigo, and I think you have a slide to pull up to walk us through? >> Yeah, I have a couple, so, great to be here again. And just as an overview, Lumigo is a serverless monitoring and debugging platform. Basically allowing the user, the developer to get an end-to-end view of every transaction in his cloud. It's basically distributed tracing that allows you from one hand to monitor, to see a visual representation of your transaction, but also allows you to drill down and debug the failure to get to the root cause. So essentially, once you have the visualization and if we'll move to the next slide, you can actually click and drill down and see all the relevant debug information like environment variables, duct rays, inputs, outputs, and so on and so forth. And by that, understanding the root cause. And sometimes those root causes of the problems are not just errors, they are latencies, they are hiccups. And for that, we can see on the next slide, where Lumigo allows you to see where do you spend your time? Where are the hiccups in your system? What's running in Paula to what in the same transaction, where you can optimize. And that's the essence of what Lumigo provides in a distributed environment and focusing on serverless. >> Got it, focusing on serverless, we'll dig into that in a second. Kevin, give us an overview of Flex. You're a customer of Lumigo? >> We are indeed. So Flex is a build smoothing platform. We help people pay their rent and other bills, in these times of uncertainty and cashflow, the first of the month for your rent, it's a big bill. Being able to split that up into multiple payments is a lot easier. And when we entered the market, you were looking at a place where people were using things like payday loans, which are just ridiculous, really hurting, hurt people in the longterm. So we want to come in with something that is a little more equitable, little fairer and help people who can well afford their rent. They just can't afford it on the first, right? And so we started with rent, and now we cover all the bills like utilities and things like that. >> What a great use case, and I can't even imagine, Kevin, in the last year and a half, how helpful that's been as the world has been so dynamic. So talk to me a little bit about what you were doing before Lumigo and we'll get into then why you went the serverless route. >> Right, so I came to Flex to help them out with some problems that we're having as our servers were scaling up. Obviously, when the business hit, it was really, it went from zero to 100 miles an hour so quickly. And so I came in to help sort out some of the growing issues. And so when I started looking at that, we were three developers and didn't want to spend time on ops, didn't want to spend time on all of the things that you have to do just to be in business, right? And it's really expensive in the technical space. If you get into something about Kubernetes or things like that, you spend a lot of time building that infrastructure, making sure, and that's really minimal value to your business. It's there for reliability, but it doesn't really focus in on the thing that is important to you. So we wanted to build something that minimized that, we talk about DevOps, we want it ops zero, right? So that's like DevOps is a really nice practice, but having people in that role, it seems like you're still doing ops, right? You still got people who are doing those things, and we want it to kind of eliminate that. So I had some experience with serverless before joining Flex. I thought we'll run up a few things and spike up a few things. When you come out of environments like Kubernetes or your more traditional AC to type infrastructure, you'd lose some things. And one of the big things you'd lose is platforms of visibility. So things like OpenTrace and Datadog, and things like that, that do these jobs of telling you what's going on in your infrastructure, you've got fairly complex infrastructure going on, lots of things happening. And so, we initially started with what was available on the platforms, right? So we started with your CloudWatch logs and New Relics, right? Which got us somewhere. But as soon as we started to get into more complex scenarios where we're talking across multiple hops, so through SQS and then through EventBridge and Dynamo, it was very difficult to be able to retrace a piece of information. And that's when we started looking around for solutions, we looked at big traditional pliers, the Datadogs, the New Relics and people like that. And then the serverless specific players, and we ended up landing on Lumigo, and I couldn't have been happier with the results, from day one, I was getting results. >> That's great, I want to talk about that too, especially as you say, we wanted to be able to focus on our core competencies and not spend time in resources that we didn't have in areas where we could actually outsource. So I want to go back to Erez, talk to me about some of the challenges that Kevin articulated, are those common across the board, across industries that Lumigo sees? >> Yeah, I think the main thing when we met Kevin main were about visibility and about ability to zoom out, see the bigger picture and when something actually fails or about to fail in production, being able to drill down to understand what happened, what is the root cause, and go ahead and fix it instead of going through different CloudWatch logs, and log groups and connecting the dots manually. And that's one of the most common challenges when enterprise, where software engineers are heading toward serverless, toward managed services. So, definitely we'll hear that it was many of our customers. >> So Kevin, talk about the infrastructure that you've set up with serverless and go through some of the main benefits that Flex is getting. >> Right, so look, the day one thing of course, is the number of people we need doing operations as we've grown is next to nothing, right? We are able to create in that, we all want this independence of execution, right? So as you scale, I think there's two ways really to scale a system, right? You can build a monolith and shot it, that works really, really well, right? You can just build something that just holds a ton of data and everything seems connected when you release it all in one place, or you build something that's a little more distributed and relies on asynchronous interactions effectively, like in everywhere but the edges, both of those things scale. The middle ground doesn't scale, right? That middle ground of synchronous systems talking to synchronous systems, at some point, your lightency is your sum of all the things you're talking to, right? So doing anything in a quick way is not possible. So when we started to look at things like, I'm sorry, so the other challenge is things like logging and understanding what's happening in your system. Logging is one of those things that you always don't have the thing logged that you're interested in, right? You put in whatever logging you like, but the thing you need will always be missing, which is why we've always taken a tracing approach, right? Why you want to use something like Lumigo or an OpenTrace, you don't sit there and say, "Hey, log this specifically," you log the information that's moving through the system. At that point, you can then look at what's happening specifically. So again, the biggest challenge for us is that we run 1500 landlords, right? We run 600 queues. There's a lot of information. We use an EventBridge, we use Dynamo, we use RDS, we've got information spread out. We moved stuff, but to third party vendors, we're talking out to say, two guys like Stripe and Co, and we're making calls out of those. And we want to understand when we've made those calls, what's the latency on those calls. And for a given interaction, it might touch 20 or 30 of those components. And so for us, the ability to say, "Hey, I want to know why this file to write down here." We need to actually look through everywhere, explain, and understand how it's complex, right? Where this piece of data that was wrong come from? And so, yeah, which is difficult in a distributed environment where your infrastructure is so much a part of somebody else's systems, you don't have direct access to assistance. You'd only got the side effects of the system. >> Right, so talk to me in that distributed environment, Kevin, how does Lumigo help to improve that? Especially as we're talking about payments and billing and sensitive financial information. >> Right, so in a couple of ways, the nice part about Lumigo is I really don't have to do much in order for it to just do its thing, right? This comes back to that philosophy of zero ops, right? Zero effort. I don't want to be concentrating on how I build my tracing infrastructure, right? I just want it to work. I want it to work out of the box when something happens, I want it to have happened. So Lumigo, when I looked at it, when I was looking at the platforms, the integration's so straightforward, the cost integration being straightforward is kind of useless, if it doesn't actually give you the information you want. And we had a challenge initially, which was, we use a lot of EventBridge, and of course, nothing tries to EventBridge until we got, I mentioned this to Erez and Co, and said, "Hey guys, we really need to try to EventBridge, and a little while later, we were tracing through EventBridge, which was fantastic. And because I would say 70% of our transactions evolve something that goes through EventBridge, the other thing there. We're also from an architectural standpoint, we're also what's known as an event source system. So we derive the state of the information from the things that have occurred rather than a current snapshot of what something looks like, right? So rather than you being Lisa with a particular phone number and particular email address stored in a database as a record, you are, Lisa changed the phone number, Lisa changed her email address. And then we take that sequence of things and create a current view of Lisa. So that also helps us with ordering, right? And at those lower levels, we can do a lot of our security. We can do a lot of our encryption, we can say that this particular piece of information, for example, a social security number is encrypted and never is available as plain text. And you need the keys to be able to unlock that particular piece of information. So we can do a lot of that, a lower level infrastructure, but that does generate a lot of movement of information. >> Right. >> And if you can't trace that movement of information, you're in a hurting place. >> So Erez, we just got a great testimonial from Kevin on how Lumigo's really fundamental to their environment and what they're able to deliver to customers, and also Kevin talked about, it sounds like some of the collaboration that went on to help get that EventBridge. Talk to me, Erez, about the collaborative partnership that you have with Flex. >> Yeah, so I think that it's more of a, I would say a philosophy of customers, the users come first. So this is what we're really trying to about. We always try to make sure there's an open communication with all of our customers and for us customer is a key and user's a key, not even a customer. And this is why we try to accommodate the different requests, specifically on this event, this was actually a while after AWS released the service and due to the partnership that we have with AWS, we were able to get this supported relatively fast and first to market supporting EventBridge, and connecting the dots around it. So that's one of the things that we really, really focused on. >> Kevin, back to you, how do you quantify the ROI of what Lumigo is delivering to Flex? >> That's a really good question. And Erez, and I've talked about this a few times, because the simple fact is if I add up the numbers, it costs me more to trace than it does to execute. But if I look at the slightly bigger picture, I also don't have op stuff, right? And I also have an ability to look at things very quickly. The service cost is nothing compared to what I would need if I was running my own tracing through OpenTrace with my own database, monitor the staff to support those things. But the management of those things, the configuration of those things, the multiple touchpoints I'd need for those things, they're not the simple thing. So, if you look at a raw cost, you go, oh man, that part is actually more than my execution costs at least certainly in the early days, but when I look at the entire cost of what it takes to watch manage and trace a system, it's a really easy song, right? And a lot of these things don't pay off until something goes wrong. Now we're heavy users of EventBridge. EventBridge has had two incidents in USA in the last six months, right? And we were able to say through our traffic, that was going through EventBridge, that the slowdown was occurring in EventBridge. In fact, we were saying that before was alerted in the IDR VUS dashboards, to say, "Hey, EventBridge is having problems," like we watch all their alerts, but we were saying an hour before leading into Titus saying, "Hey, there's something going wrong here." Right? Because we were seeing delays in the system. So things like that give you an opportunity to adjust, right? You can't do it. You're not going to be able to get everything off of EventBridge for that period. But at least I can talk to the business and say, "Hey, we're having an impact here, and this is what's going on. We don't think it's our systems, we think it's actually something external. We can see the tries, we see it going in, we see it coming out, it's a 20 minute delay." >> There's a huge amount of value in that, sorry, Kevin, in that visibility alone, as you said, and even maybe even some cost avoidance is there, if you're seeing something going wrong, you maybe can pivot and adjust as needed. But without that visibility, you don't have that. There's a lot of potential loss. >> Yeah, and it's one of those things that doesn't pay for itself until it pays for itself, right? It's like insurance, you don't need insurance until you need insurance. These sort of things, people look at these things and go, "Ah, what am I getting it from day to day?" And day to day, I'll use Lumigo, right? When I'm developing now, Lumigo is part of my development process, in that, I use it to make sure the information is flowing in the way I expect it to, right? Which wasn't what I expected to be able to do with it, right? It wasn't even a plan or anything I intended to use it for, but day to day now, when I buy something off, one of the checks I go through when I'm debugging or when I'm looking at a problem, especially distributed problem is what went through Lumigo. What happened here, here and here, and why did that happen in response to this? So, these things are, again, it's that insurance thing, you don't need it until you need it, and when you need it, you're so glad you've got it. >> Right, exactly. >> Actually it's already said, I have a question because, yeah, I think that it's clear on that part. And how did this, if it change the developer work in Flex, do you feel different on that part? >> I think it's down to individual developers, how they use the different tools, just like individual developers use different tools. I tend to, and a couple of people that I work closely with tend to use these tools in this way, probably where the more advanced users of serverless in general inside the organization. So we were more aware of these weird little things that occur and justly double-checks you want to do. But I feel like when I don't have something like Lumigo in place, it's very hard for me to understand, did everything happen? I can write my acceptance tests, but I want to make sure that, testing is a really fun art, right? And it's picking my cabinets nice and easy, and you can run all these formulas to do things, it's just not right, and there's just too many, especially in distributed space, too many cases where things look odd, things look strange, you've got weird edge cases. We get new timeouts in Dynamo. We hit the 100,000 limit in fresh hall on Dynamo, right? In production, that was really interesting because it meant we needed to do some additional things. >> Lisa: Kevin, oh, go ahead. >> Go ahead, no, go ahead, Lisa. >> I was just going to ask you, I'd love to get your perspective. It sounds like, you look at other technologies, there's been some clear benefits and differentiators that you saw, which is why you chose Lumigo, but it also sounds like there were some things that surprised you. So in your opinion, what are some of the key differentiators of Lumigo versus its competitors? >> So I guess I've been a partner with Lumigo for like eight months now, right? Which is a long time in the history of Flex, right? 'Cause we're just out of two and a half years old. So, when I did the initial evaluation, I was looking for the things. I'm lazy, so I wanted something that I could just drop in and it would just work, right? And get the information I wanted to ask. I wanted something that was giving me information consistently. So I try to figure these things out and hit them with some load. I wanted it to have coverage of the assistance that we use. We use Dynamo a lot. We use Lambros a lot, and I want it not just cursory coverage, how it's just another one of the 20,000 things that they do, I wanted something that was dedicated to it. That gave me information that was useful for me. And really the specialist serverless providers were the obvious choice there. When you looked at the more general providers, the Datadogs and New Relics, I think if you're in an environment that has a lot of other different types of systems running on, then maybe the specificity that you'd lose is worthwhile, right? There's trade off you can make, but we're in a highly serverless environment, so one of the specificity. When I looked at the vendors, Lumigo was the one that worked best straight out of the box for me, it gave me the information I wanted. It gave me the experience I wanted, and to be frank, they've reached out really quickly and had a chat about what were my specific problems, what I was thinking. And all of those things add up, a proactive vendor, just doing the things you wanted to do, and what became and has become a lasting partnership, and I don't say partnership lightly 'cause we've worked with a number of other vendors, right? For different things. But Lumigo, I have turned to these guys, 'cause these guys know serverless, right? So I've turned to these guys when I've gone, "Look, I am not sure what the best approach here is." You have trusted me about it, this is vendor, right? >> Right, but it sounds like it's very synergistic, collaborative trusted relationship. And to your point, not using the term partner lightly, I think arises, probably couldn't have been a better testimonial for Lumigo, its capabilities, and what you guys are able to do. So I'll give you, Erez the last word, just give the audience a little bit of an overview of the AWS partnership. >> Sure, so AWS has been a very strategic partner for Lumigo, and that means that, I would say the most critical part is a product, is a technology. And we are design partners with the serverless team. And that means that we work with AWS to make sure that before new services are released, they get our feedback on whether we can integrate easily or not, and making sure that on the launch date, we are able to be a launch partner for a lot of their services. And this strong partnership with R&D team is what's allowing Lumigo to support new services out of the box like Kevin mentioned. >> Excellent, gentlemen, thank you so much for joining me today, talking about, not just about Lumigo, but getting this great perspective of it through the CTO lens with Kevin, we appreciate your insights, your time, and what a great testimonial. >> Thank you very much, thank you, Kevin. >> Thanks, Lisa, thanks Erez. >> You're most welcome. For Erez Berkner and Kevin O'Neill, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching the AWS Startup Showcase for Q3. (gentle music)

Published Date : Sep 15 2021

SUMMARY :

Erez Berkner is back, the And Kevin O'Neill, the and I think you have a slide and debug the failure to You're a customer of Lumigo? And so we started with rent, So talk to me a little bit on the thing that is important to you. resources that we didn't have And that's one of the So Kevin, talk about the infrastructure but the thing you need Right, so talk to me in to EventBridge until we got, And if you can't trace that you have with Flex. and connecting the dots around it. monitor the staff to support those things. in that visibility alone, as you said, and when you need it, you're if it change the developer work in Flex, and you can run all these and differentiators that you saw, of the assistance that we use. And to your point, and making sure that on the launch date, and what a great testimonial. For Erez Berkner and Kevin

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
KevinPERSON

0.99+

Kevin O'NeillPERSON

0.99+

ErezPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

USALOCATION

0.99+

Kevin O'NeillPERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

1500 landlordsQUANTITY

0.99+

eight monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

LumigoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Erez BerknerPERSON

0.99+

zeroQUANTITY

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

20 minuteQUANTITY

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

two incidentsQUANTITY

0.99+

two guysQUANTITY

0.99+

three developersQUANTITY

0.99+

30QUANTITY

0.99+

EventBridgeORGANIZATION

0.99+

DynamoORGANIZATION

0.99+

two waysQUANTITY

0.99+

DevOpsTITLE

0.99+

two guestsQUANTITY

0.99+

600 queuesQUANTITY

0.99+

Erez and CoORGANIZATION

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

FlexORGANIZATION

0.98+

DatadogsORGANIZATION

0.98+

one placeQUANTITY

0.98+

20,000 thingsQUANTITY

0.97+

OpenTraceTITLE

0.97+

PaulaLOCATION

0.96+

100 miles an hourQUANTITY

0.96+

Erez Berkner, Lumigo | CUBE Conversation


 

(bouncy music) >> Welcome to this Cube Conversation, I'm Lisa Martin. I'm joined by Erez Berkner, the CEO and co-founder of lumigo. Erez, welcome to the program. >> Hey Lisa, thank you for having me. Glad to be here. >> Excellent, we're going to have a great conversation. We're going to be talking about the growing trend of using cloud native and serverless. But before we do, Erez, give our audience an overview of lumigo. >> Excellent, so lumigo is an observability platform. Basically allowing developer, architects, the technology person in the organization to understand what's going on with his modern cloud, with his serverless, with his cloud native application. So at the end of the day, lumigo as assess platform, allow you to know what's happening, get visibility, and be able to get to the root cause of issues, many times before they actually hit your production. >> I saw on your website, in terms of speed, getting up and running quickly, in four minutes with four clicks. Tell me how developers do this that quickly. >> Yeah, that's actually great point. Because in general, when we talk about the modern cloud, people are really fed up with deploying agents, long processes of servers, and more and more we see the trend towards APIs, toward code libraries. At the end of the day, at the heart of lumigo, we built a very strong automation engine based on APIs, based on lomdalier integration. And this allows a developer to basically connect lumigo via the APIs in couple of clicks. Doesn't require code changes, deployment of agents, deployment of services. And this is why it's so fast, because it's lightweight. And that's a trend of managed services, of serverless, and lumigo is another stone in that wall. >> Excellent, lightweight, key there. Define serverless, what is considered serverless? >> Mmm, ooh, don't get me involved in dispute of those definitions. But I can share my view, but this is a.. Anyone, I would say, have his own definition. But the main concept with serverless is at the end of the day, really, like it says, serverless. You don't deploy a server. You don't rent a server, you don't manage a server, you don't deploy an operating system, you don't patch a server. You don't take care of scalability, of high visibility. Basically, all the chores of managing, of maintaining a server, basically go away. Now, they don't really go away. Somebody else is dealing with them. So there is a server, but it's not your server to manage. And that someone is a cloud provider, is Amazon, is Microsoft, is Google, it's IBM. And this is how I view serverless. Basically, a managed service that doesn't require to deploy or manage a server, and you use it via APIs. And if you think about that, in the past when serverless started, 2015, serverless was function as a service, Lambda, AWS started that. But today, in 2021, serverless, yeah, it's function as a service, it's Lambda, but it's also storage as a service, like S3, and data as a service, like Snowflake, like DynamoDB. And queue as a service like SNS, like EventBridge, like Kenesis. And even Stripe, payment a as service, and Twilio, and SendGrid. So all these API based services, that you just consume, and they're like Lego pieces that you connect together and you just connect and you go, and you start working and they up and running, this is how I define serverless today. And that's basically allowing you to run any application today with zero servers. >> That's a great definition, that nice and clean, and I think the Lego bricks really kind of clicked in my mind when you talked about that. Let's talk now about for business critical production applications, what are you seeing in terms of adoption of serverless for those cases? >> That's a great question, because I think that we are in a critical point of time, in cloud native, in modern cloud, in serverless market. And I think it's an evolution. You know, when we started, again, back in 2015, serverless was just one or two services. But we got to a critical mass of services, including DynamoDB and S3 and Lambda and EventBridge and all the other services, that step function, that basically allow you to build your application based on serverless. And this critical point of the architecture of serverless being mature enough, being wide enough, to allow you to do what you want, to have the confidence running serverless in production, to know that you have the tooling that you used to have in the past to monitor, to debug, to secure, to understand cost, all of this are really coming together this year. We actually see this year, and a bit of end of last year, but this is what's driving a trend in the industry. I think it's still not known enough to many of the organizations, or not wide enough, or not public enough. But our customers are focused on cloud native and serverless. And we've seen a dramatic change in the last six months. And the main change is organizations that used to play around with serverless, that used to do non-business critical usage of serverless, because it's easy, because it makes sense, because it's fast, all of a sudden they got the confidence to do that with their business critical application in production. And this is a shift that we're seeing. And that goes many times with the technology maturity. You start, you play around with something, it makes sense, it makes sense, you get confidence, and boom! This become more and more mainstream technology. And we're at the verge of that. >> In terms of a catalyst for that confidence, do you think that the events, the world events of the last 12 months and this acceleration of digital transformation, has that played any part in the maturation of the technology that's giving customers the confidence to adopt serverless? >> Yeah, I think it's fascinating, what we're seeing. Because I think the last event really push a organization to innovate. Because of different reason, because they don't have the head count, so they need to reduce the maintenance that they do, they need to reduce the developer head count, the DevOps head count, they need to reduce costs. Serverless is running only when it need to run, so you pay only for what you use. So this is another method that our customer, for example, reduce their cost. So I think beyond the maturity of the architecture, the push forward for optimization, for lower usage or lower usage of engineering force, really pushed serverless forward. And this paradigm, once it worked for one team, it's viral. It's viral with in organization and the cross-organization. So this team managed to reduce 50% of the cost, and 70% of the developers that need to maintain the production. Let's duplicate that. And let's do that four times, and five times, and 10 times. And this is the point in time that we are. So that's a trend and I think it's very much impacted by the world economics. >> Interesting, that trend of virality. Let's dig into, you mentioned a couple of benefits. I heard reduction in total cost of ownership, or costs. Talk to me about the lumigo solution, the technology, and what some of those key benefits are that it is consistently delivering to your customers. >> So I think the basic is that serverless makes a lot of sense, economical, maintenance. That's why the cloud providers are putting so much effort and power in delivering more and more serverless maturity. One of the challenges that we see for almost any organization adopting the new technology, it goes back to we understand the values, but at the end of the day I need to make sure that if something goes wrong in production, I will know about it and I will know how to react and fix it in a matter of minutes. 'Cause that's my service, that's my business. And I know how to do it in a server world, where there's one server or three servers, and everything running in the same server. I have the tools for that. And I want to go serverless, I want to go cloud native, but all of a sudden there are dozens of services that I consume via APIs and they're a part of a bigger picture of my application. So I'm lacking many times the confidence, the tools, the awareness of, something goes wrong, I'll know about it, and I'll be able to fix it. And this is where lumigo comes in. So we built lumigo from the ground up to be very much focused on the modern cloud, on serverless. And that means two main things that we provide for our customers. One is, I would say one thing. We provide confidence. You can use serverless in production, and you can rest assured that if something goes wrong, you will be the one alerting and we'll give you all the information to debug it. And we do it by two main things. One is the visibility that we create. Because we're connected to the environment, we alert on things that are relevant to serverless. It's not about CPU, it's not about a iO. It's about concurrency limits, it's about cold start, it's about time outs, it's about reaching duration limits. These are the things that we know to alert you about. It's very specific to the serverless services. And it's not a generic metric, it's serverless metric. So that's number one, visibility, getting alert whenever something is about to go wrong. But what do you do then? Let's say I have one million invocations a day, and one of them is actually, I have a trigger, something went wrong. And this is where lumigo allow the developers to debug. Basically, you click on a specific issue, and lumigo tell you the entire story of what happened, from the very beginning, an API gateway triggering a Lambda, right into DynamoDB, triggering an Lambda, it tell you the entire story end to end of what happened with that specific request, with inputs, with outputs, with environment variables. All the things the developer need in order to debug, to find the root cause, and then fix it in matter of minutes. And that's the game-changer that allow those organizations to run serverless with confidence. >> You talk about confidence, it's a word that I hear often when I'm talking with customers of vendors. It's not something to be underestimated. It's incredibly important that technology provide that confidence, especially given the events of the last year and a half that we've seen where suddenly folks couldn't get into data centers, for example. Talk to me a little bit about some of the customers. I saw from your website some great brand names, but talk to me about a customer that you think really not only has that confidence that lumigo is delivering, but is really changing their business and their approach to modern monitoring with lumigo. >> Yeah, so there are several interesting. I'll choose maybe one of the more interesting cases, a company called Medtronic. It's one of the largest medical device companies in the U.S. And it's very interesting because they have an IoT backend. Basically they have medical devices around the world that send IoT information back to their cloud. And they get metrics, they run machine learning on that. And they took a strategic decision to run the system with serverless. Because it can scale automatically, because it can deploy one more million devices and they don't need to change anything, and many, many other benefits of serverless. And we met them back in 20, end of 2019. They were looking for exactly a solution that allows them to get issues and drill down to analyze those issues. And they were just in the beginning. The early days they had 20 million invocations, requests per month. They knew they were going to scale, they knew that when they scale, they cannot correlate logs, and try to understand what happened manually. They need a professional tool. And this is where they started using lumigo. And today, a year and a half after, they reached one billion invocations a month. Again, the same concept, IoT devices, medical devices, sending metrics and information for the backend for processing. And today, lumigo is monitoring everything in that environment. And alert them from, you're about to have a problem, or you have an application error, or you have high latency, you have spike of cost, all of that are covered by lumigo. And the developers, once they get this to slot, to play the duty, you're just able to click on it, and drill down and see, one by one, requests that created the trigger that alert. And they can understand, again, the inputs, the output, the logs, the return values, everything. I call it debugging heaven. Because it's always there, it's always post-mortem, you don't need to do anything. At the same time you get the visibility and you can fix it, because this is their production, this is their business critical application. >> Debugging heaven, I love that. That's for developers, that is probably a Nirvana state. I want to wrap up Erez, just giving our folks in the audience an overview of the relationship that lumigo has with AWS. >> AWS is one of our strongest partner. I think there's a great synergy working with AWS. We've been partners for the last three years. And I think the reason for the... You know, we're still... AWS has thousands, tens of thousands of partners. I think that this partnership is specifically strong because there is a win-win relationship over here. On the one hand side lumigo is very much invested on Amazon. Our customers are mostly Amazon customers, and we are solving, providing confidence for those customers to run serverless in production, and answering a need of a customer. And this is also the win for Amazon. Amazon is basically have a great, great technology of serverless. But the lack of visibility, the lack of confidence, is hindering the adoption. And Amazon decided to work with lumigo, saying, we'll develop the core, we'll develop the services, we'll develop the serverless architecture, and you can use lumigo for monitoring, for debugging, for everything that you need in order to run that in production. And that's been very, very strong relationship that just grows as we develop together. And it's been on working together with customers, introducing customers, but also on the technology level. For the audience who sees Amazon announcement on serverless, many times lumigo is a design partner. It's part of the announcement, of lumigo was a design partner and the launch partner, and support the new feature out of the box. This is because we want to get the support as soon as possible, as soon as new features are released. So that's where we are today. >> Sounds like a very collaborative and symbiotic relationship. Erez, thank you for joining me on the program today, talking to us about some of the trends in serverless, some of the things that are catalyzing adoption, that visibility, that confidence, that lumigo delivers to its customers. We thank you for your time. >> Excellent, thank you very much Lisa. Have a good day. >> You too! For Erez Berkner, I'm Lisa Martin. Thanks for watching this Cube Conversation. (bouncy music)

Published Date : Sep 7 2021

SUMMARY :

the CEO and co-founder of lumigo. Glad to be here. about the growing trend So at the end of the day, in four minutes with four clicks. At the end of the day, is considered serverless? is at the end of the day, and I think the Lego bricks And the main change is and 70% of the developers solution, the technology, allow the developers to debug. of the last year and At the same time you get the of the relationship that and support the new that lumigo delivers to its customers. Excellent, thank you very much Lisa. this Cube Conversation.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

ErezPERSON

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

five timesQUANTITY

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

2015DATE

0.99+

10 timesQUANTITY

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

MedtronicORGANIZATION

0.99+

U.S.LOCATION

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

Erez BerknerPERSON

0.99+

one serverQUANTITY

0.99+

three serversQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

end of 2019DATE

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

this yearDATE

0.99+

one teamQUANTITY

0.99+

20 million invocationsQUANTITY

0.99+

20DATE

0.99+

two servicesQUANTITY

0.99+

LambdaTITLE

0.98+

four minutesQUANTITY

0.98+

four clicksQUANTITY

0.98+

S3TITLE

0.98+

one more million devicesQUANTITY

0.97+

LegoORGANIZATION

0.97+

NirvanaLOCATION

0.97+

one billion invocationsQUANTITY

0.97+

one thingQUANTITY

0.97+

four timesQUANTITY

0.97+

endDATE

0.96+

two main thingsQUANTITY

0.96+

one million invocations a dayQUANTITY

0.95+

last year and a halfDATE

0.95+

DynamoDBTITLE

0.95+

last six monthsDATE

0.95+

lumigoORGANIZATION

0.94+

tomerPERSON

0.94+

SnowflakeTITLE

0.93+

two main thingsQUANTITY

0.93+

tens of thousandsQUANTITY

0.92+

dozens of servicesQUANTITY

0.91+

SNSTITLE

0.88+

a monthQUANTITY

0.88+

last 12 monthsDATE

0.86+

EventBridgeTITLE

0.82+

lumigoTITLE

0.82+

Peter Adderton, Mobile X Global, Inc. & Nicolas Girard, OXIO | Cloud City Live 2021


 

>> Okay. We're back here. theCube and all the action here in Mobile World Congress, cloud city, I'm John ferry, host of the cube. We've got a great remote interviews. Of course, it's a hybrid event here in the cube. And of course, cloud city's bringing all the physical face-to-face and we're going to get the remote interviews. Peter Adderton, founder, chairman, CEO of Mobile X Global. Nicholas Gerrard, founder and CEO of OxyGo. Gentlemen, thank you for coming in remotely onto the cube here in the middle of cloud city. You missed Bon Jovi last night, he was awesome. The little acoustic unplugged and all the action. Thanks for coming on. >> Yeah, thanks for having us. >> All right, Peter and Nicholas, if you don't mind, just take a quick 30 seconds to set the table on what you guys do, your business and your focus here at Mobile World Congress. >> So I'll jump in quickly. Being the Australian, I'll go first, but just quick by way of background, I founded a company called Boost Mobile, which is one of the, is now the fourth largest mobile brand in, in America. And I spent a lot of time managing effort in that, in that space and now launching Mobile X, which is kind of the first cloud AI platform that we're going to build for mobile. >> Awesome. Nicholas. >> So I'm a founder of a company called, Ox Fuel where we do is basically a telecommunity service platform for brands to basically incorporate telecom as part of their services and learn from their customers through what we call a telecom business intelligence. So basically making sense of the telecom data to improve their business across retail, financial services or in-demand economy. >> Awesome. Well, thanks for the setup. Peter, I want to ask you first, if you don't mind, the business models in the telecom area is really becoming, not just operate, but build and build new software enabled software defined just cloud-based software. And this has been a change in mindset, not so much a change so much in the actual topologies per se, or the actual investments, but as a change in personnel. What's your take on this whole cloud powering the change in the future of telco? >> Well, I think you've got to look at where the telcos have come from in order to understand where they're going in the future. And where they've come from is basically using other people's technology to try to create a differentiation. And I think that that's the struggle that they're going to have. They talk about wanting to convert themselves from telcos into techcos. I just think it's a leap too far for the carriers to do that. So I think we're going to see, you know, them pushing 5G, which you see they're doing out there right now. Then they start talking about open rand and cloud and, and at the end of the day, all they want to do is basically sell you a plan, give you a phone attached to that and try to make as much money out of you as they possibly can. And they disguise that basically in the whole technology 5G open rand discussion, but they really, I don't think care. And at the end of the day, I don't think the consumers care, their model isn't built around technology. The model is built around selling your data and, and that's their fundamental principle and how they do that. And I've seen them go through from 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G. Every G we see come out has a promise of something new and incredible. But what we basically get is a data plan with the minutes. Right? >> Yeah, yeah I totally right on. And I think we're going to get into the whole edge piece of what that's going to open up when you start thinking about what, what the capabilities are and this new stakeholders who are going to have an interest in the trillions of dollars on the table right now, up for grabs. But Nicholas wanted to get to you on this whole digital-first thing, because one of the things we've been saying on theCube and interviewing folks and riffing on is: If digital drives more value and there's new use cases that are going to bring on, that's going to enabled by software. There's now new stakeholders coming and saying, Hey, you know what? I need more than just a pipe. I need more than just the network. I need to actually run healthcare. I need to run education on the edge. These are now industrial and consumer related use cases. I mean, this is software. This is where software and apps shine. So cloud native can enable that. So what's your take on the industry as they start to wake up and say, holy shit, this is going to be pretty massive when you look at what's coming. Not so much what's going to be replatformed, but what's coming. >> Yeah, no, I think it's a, it's where I kind join Peter on this. There's been pretty significant, heavy innovation on the carrier side for, you know, if you think about it 30 years or so of like just reselling plans effectively, which is a virtual slice of the network that built. And all of a sudden they started competing against, you know, the heavyweights on the internet. We had, putting the bar really high in terms of, you know, latency in terms of expectation, in terms of APIs, right? We've we've heard about telecom APIs for 15 years, right? It's- nothing comes close to what you could get if you start building on top of a Stripe or a Google. So I think, it's going to be hard for a lot of those companies. What we do with our show is we try to bridge that gap. Right, we try to build on top of their infrastructure to be able to expose modern APIs, to be able to open up a programmatic interface so that innovators like Peter's are able to actually really take the user experience forward and start, building those specialized businesses across healthcare, financial services, and whatnot. >> Yeah, David Blanca and I were on the, on theCube yesterday talking about how Snowflake, a company that basically sits on top of Amazon built almost nothing on the infrastructure. Built on top of it and was successful. Peter, this is a growth thing. One of the things I want to get your thoughts on is you've had experiences in growing companies. How do you look at the growth coming into this market, Peter, because you know, you got to have new opportunities coming in. It's a growth play too. It's not just take share from someone. It's net new capabilities. >> Yeah. Here's the issue you've got with the wireless industry is that there's only a very few amount of them that actually have that last mile covered. So if you're going to build something on top of it, you're going to have to deal with the carrier, and the carrier as out of like a duopoly slash monopoly, because without their access to their network, you're not going to be able to do these incredible things. So I think we've got a real challenge there where you're going to have to get the carriers to innovate. Now you've got the CEO of Deutsche Telekom coming out yesterday saying that the OTT players aren't paying their fair share. Right, and I sit back and go, well, hang on. You're selling data to customers who basically are using that data to use apps and OTT. And now he's saying, well, they should pay as well. So not only the consumer pay, but now the OTT players should pay. It's a mixed message. So what you're going to have to do, and what we're going to have to do as a, as a growth industry is we're going to have to allow it to grow. And the only way to do that is that the carriers are going to have to have better access, allow more access to their networks, as Nico said, let the APIs has become more available. I just think that that's a leap too far. So I think we're going to be handicapped in our growth based on these carriers. And it's going to take regulators and it's going to take innovation and consumers demanding carriers, do it, otherwise, you know, you're still going to deal with the three carriers in your world. >> Yeah, That's interesting about- I was just talking to Danielle Royce, the DR here at TelcoDR. And she said, I was talking about ORAN and there's more infrastructure than needed. She said, oh, it's more software. I don't disagree with her. I do agree with it. But I also think that the ORAN points to, Nicholas, kind of this idea that there's more surface area to be had on the scale side. So standardizing hardware creates a lower fixed cost, so you can get some cost reduction. And then with standardized software, you get more enablement for hardened openness. I mean, open source is already proven. You can still be secure. And obviously Cloud was once said, could never be secure and most, is probably more secure than anything. What's your take on this whole ORAN commodity standardization mission- efforts? >> I think it's a, I mean, it goes along to the second phase, right? Of what the differentiation in telecom was, you know. Early on, specialized boxes that are very expensive. You know, that you, you, you, you get from a few vendors, then you have the transition over to a software. We lower the price, as you were mentioning. It can run on off the shelf hardware. And then we're in the transition, which is what Danielle is, is evangelizing, right. Transition towards the cloud and specifically the public cloud, because there's no such thing as a private cloud really. And, and so up and running is just another, another piece where you can make the Legos connect better effectively and just have more flexibility. And generally the, the, the game here is to also break the agenda when you- from, from the vendors, right? Because now you have a standard, so you don't necessarily need to buy the entire stack from, from the same vendors. You have a lot more flexibility. You know, you've probably followed the same debate that we've all seen, right. With a push against Huawei, for instance. Th-this is extremely hard for an operator, to start ripping out an entire vendor, because most of the time, they, they own the entire stack. But something like ORAN, now you can start mixing and matching with different vendors, but generally this is also a trend that's going to accelerate the move towards the public cloud. >> That's awesome. Peter, I want to get your thoughts because you're basically building on the cloud. And if you don't mind chime it in to kind of end the segment on this one point. People are trying to really get their minds around what refactoring means. And we've been saying, and talking about, you know, the three phases of, of waking up to the world. Reset your business, or reboot. Replatform to the cloud, and then refactor, which means take advantage of cloud enabled things, whether it's AI and other things. But first get on the platform, understand the economics, and then replatform. So the question, Peter, we'll start with you. What does refactoring actually mean and look like in a successful future execution or playbook? Can you share your thoughts, because this is what people want to get to because that's where the value will come from. That's where the iteration gets you. What's your take on this refactoring? >> Yeah, yeah. So I always, I mean, we're in the consumer business, so I'm always about what is the difference going to make for the consumer? So, whether you're, and when you look at refactoring and you look at what's happening in the space. Is what is the difference that's going to, what are the consumers going to see that's different and are they willing to pay for that? And so we can strip away the technical layers and we all get caught up in the industry with these buzzwords and terms, and we get, and at the end of the day, when it moves to the consumer, the consumer just sits there and says, so what's the value? How much am I paying? And so what we're trying to do at MobileX is, we're trying to use the cloud and we're trying to use kind of innovation into create a better experience for the consumer. One way to do that is to basically help the customer, understand their usage patents. You know, right now today, they don't understand that. Right if I asked you how much you paid for your mobile bill, you will tell me my cell phone bill is $150, but I'm going to ask you the next question How much data do you use? You go, I don't know, right? >> John: unlimited. >> And then I'd say why am I started- well you'd say limited, right. I will go. I'd go, I don't know. So I sit back and go, most customers are like you. You're basically paying for a service that you have no clear, no idea what you're getting. And it's designed by the carriers to scare you into thinking you need it. So I think we've got to get away from the buzzwords that we use as an industry and just dumb that down to what, what does that mean for a consumer? And I think that the cloud is going to allow us to create some very unique ways for consumers to interact with their device and their usage of that device. And I think that that's the holy grail for me. >> Yeah. That's a great point. And it's worth calling out because I think if the cloud can get you a 10X value at, at a reduction in costs compared to the competition, that's one benefit that people will pay for. And the other one is just, Hey, that's really cool. I want I'll, I value that, that's a valuable thing. I'll pay for it. So it's interesting that the cloud scale there, it's just a good mindset. >> Yeah. So it's always, I always like say to people, you know, I've spoken a lot to the Dish guys about what open rand is going to do and I keep saying to them, so what's the value that I'm going to get from a consumer. And they'll say, oh it's flexible pricing plans. They're now starting to talk about, okay, what the end product is of this technology. You look at ECM, right? ECM has been around for a long time. It's only now that we're to see ECM technology, get enabled. The carriers fought that for a long, long time. So there's a monumental shift that needs to take place. And it's in the four or five carriers in our counties. >> Awesome. Nicholas, what's your take on refactoring? Obviously, you know, you've got APIs, you've got all this cool software enabled. How do you get to refactoring and how do you execute through that? >> I mean, it's a little bit of a, what Peter was saying as well, right? There's the, the advantage of that point is to be, you know, all our stuff basically lives in the cloud, right. So it's opportunity to, to get that closer, you know, just having better latency, making sure that, you know, you're not losing your, your photos and your data as you lose your phone and yep. Just bet- better access in general. I, I think ultimately like the, the push to the cloud right now is it's mostly just a cost reduction. The back tick, as far as the carriers are concerned, right. They don't necessarily see how they can build that break. And then from there start interacting with the rest of the OTT world and, and, you know, Netflix is built on Amazon and companies like that, right? Like, so as you're able to get closer as a carrier to that cloud where the data lives, this is also just empowering better digital experience. >> Yeah I think that's where the that's, the proof point will be there, as they say, that's where the rubber will meet the road or proof is in the pudding, whatever expression. Once they get to that cost reduction, if they can wake up to that, whoa we can actually do something better here and make m- or if they don't someone else will. Right. That's the whole point. So, final question as we wrap up, ecosystem changeover. Lot more ecosystem action. I mean, there's a lot of vendors here at Mobile Congress, but real quick, Peter, Nicholas, your take on the future of ecosystem around this new telco. Peter, we'll start with you. >> Yeah, I look, I mean, it, it, again, it keeps coming back to, to, to where I say that consumers have driven all the ecosystems that have ever existed. And when I say consumers also to IOT as well, right? So it's not just the B to C it's also B to B. So look to the consumer and look to the business to see what pain points you can solve. And that will create the ecosystems. None of us bet on Uber, none of us bet on Airbnb. Otherwise we'd all be a lot richer than we are today. So none of us took that platform- and by the way, we've been in mobile and wireless and any kind of that space smartphone space for a long time. And we will miss those applications. And if you ask a CEO today of a telco, what's the 5G killer application, that's going to send 5G into the next atmosphere, they can't answer the question. They'll talk about drones and robotic surgeries and all things that basically will never have any value to a consumer at the end of the day. So I think we've got to go back to the consumer and that's where my focus is and say, how do we make their lives better? And that will create the ecosystem. >> Yeah, I mean, they go for the low hanging fruit. Low latency and, and whatnot. But yeah, let's, it's going to be, it's going to be, we'll see what happens. Nicolas your take on ecosystems as they develop. A lot more integrations and not customization. What's your thoughts? >> Yeah, I think so too. I mean, I think going back to, you know, again like 20- 20 years ago, the network was the product conductivity to the product. Today it's a, it's a building block, right? Something that you integrate that's part of your experience. So the same way we're seeing like conversions between telecom and financial services. Right? You see a lot of telcos trying to be banks. Banks and fintechs trying to be telcos. It's, it's a blending of that, right? So it, at the end of the day, it's like, why, what is the experience? What is the above and beyond the conductivity? Because customers, at this point, it's just not differentiated based on conductivity, kind of become just a busy commodity. So even as you look at what Peter is building, right, this, what is the experience above and beyond just buying a plan that I get out of it, or if you are a media company, you know, how do I pair my content or resolve real problems? Like for instance, we work a lot to the NBA and TikTok. They get into markets where, you know, having a video product at the end and people not being well-connected, that's a problem, right? So it's an opportunity for them to bring the building block into their ecosystem and start offering solutions that are a different shape. >> Awesome. Gentlemen, thank you so much. Both of you, both experienced entrepreneurs and executives riding the wave on the right side of history, I believe. Thanks for coming on theCube, I appreciate it. >> Thanks for having us. >> If you're not riding the wave the right way, you're driftwood. And we're going to toss it back to the studio. Adam and the team, take it from here.

Published Date : Jul 6 2021

SUMMARY :

ferry, host of the cube. on what you guys do, is now the fourth largest Awesome. sense of the telecom data in the actual topologies for the carriers to do that. I need to run education on the edge. heavy innovation on the carrier side for, you know, One of the things I want that the carriers are going to on the scale side. the game here is to also So the question, Peter, but I'm going to ask you the next question and just dumb that down to what, And the other one is just, I always like say to people, you know, and how do you execute that point is to be, you know, the proof point will to see what pain points you can solve. for the low hanging fruit. I mean, I think going back to, you know, riding the wave on the right Adam and the team, take it from here.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Peter AddertonPERSON

0.99+

Nicholas GerrardPERSON

0.99+

AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

NicholasPERSON

0.99+

PeterPERSON

0.99+

AdamPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

HuaweiORGANIZATION

0.99+

$150QUANTITY

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Ox FuelORGANIZATION

0.99+

MobileXORGANIZATION

0.99+

TelcoDRORGANIZATION

0.99+

30 secondsQUANTITY

0.99+

OxyGoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Deutsche TelekomORGANIZATION

0.99+

Mobile X Global, Inc.ORGANIZATION

0.99+

Mobile X GlobalORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

Boost MobileORGANIZATION

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

David BlancaPERSON

0.99+

10XQUANTITY

0.99+

AirbnbORGANIZATION

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

TikTokORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

30 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

NicoPERSON

0.99+

DaniellePERSON

0.99+

BothQUANTITY

0.99+

John ferryPERSON

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

Nicolas GirardPERSON

0.99+

second phaseQUANTITY

0.99+

NBAORGANIZATION

0.99+

Danielle RoycePERSON

0.99+

TodayDATE

0.99+

OXIOORGANIZATION

0.99+

SnowflakeORGANIZATION

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.98+

trillions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

ORANORGANIZATION

0.98+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.97+

Mobile World CongressEVENT

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

five carriersQUANTITY

0.97+

20DATE

0.96+

last nightDATE

0.96+

LegosORGANIZATION

0.95+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.95+

three carriersQUANTITY

0.95+

OneQUANTITY

0.94+

one pointQUANTITY

0.94+

first thingQUANTITY

0.94+

fourth largest mobileQUANTITY

0.93+

first cloudQUANTITY

0.9+

One wayQUANTITY

0.89+

NicolasPERSON

0.89+

Mobile CongressORGANIZATION

0.89+

2021DATE

0.87+

Mobile XTITLE

0.85+

20 years agoDATE

0.8+

theCubeORGANIZATION

0.77+

three phasesQUANTITY

0.77+

Bon JoviPERSON

0.77+

ECMTITLE

0.73+

Likhit Wagle & John Duigenan, IBM | IBM Think 2021


 

>>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of IBM. Think 20, 21 brought to you by IBM, >>Welcome back to IBM. Think at 2021, the virtual edition, my name is Dave Volante and you're watching the cubes continuous coverage of think 21. And right now we're going to talk about banking and the post isolation economy. I'm very pleased to welcome our next guests. Look at Wigley's the general manager global banking financial markets at IBM and John diagonal is the global CTO and vice president and distinguished engineer for banking and financial services. Gentlemen, welcome to the cube. That's my pleasure. Look at this current economic upheaval, it's quite a bit different from the last one. Isn't it? I mean, liquidity doesn't seem to be a problem for most banks these days. I mean, if anything, they're releasing loan loss reserves that they didn't need. What's from your perspective, what's the state of banking today and hopefully as we exit this pandemic soon. Okay. >>So, so Dave, I think, like you say, it's a, it's a, it's a state in a picture that, uh, in a significantly different from what people were expecting. And I, and I think some way, in some ways you're seeing the benefits of a number of the regulations that were put into, into place after the, you know, the financial crisis last time round, right? And therefore this time, you know, a health crisis did not become a financial crisis because I think the banks were in better shape. And also, you know, governments clearly have put worldwide a lot of liquidity into the, into the system. Um, I think if you look at it though, um, maybe two or three things ready to call out, firstly, there's a, there's a massive regional variation. So if you look at the U S banking industry, uh, it's extremely buoyant and I'll come back to that in a managing the way in which it's performing. >>Uh, you know, the banks that are starting to report that first quarter results are going to show a profitability that's significantly ahead of where they were last year. And probably some of those, some of that best performance for quite a long time, if you go into Europe, it's a completely different picture. I think the banks are extremely challenged at that. And I think you're going to see a much Bleaker outlook in terms of what those banks report, as far as Asia Pacific is concerned again, you know, because they did, they have come out of the pandemic much faster that consumer businesses back into growth. Again, I think they're showing some pretty buoyant up performance as far as, as far as banking performance is concerned. I think the beast that's particularly interesting. And I think Kim is a bit of a surprise to most, uh, is, is what we've seen in the U S right? >>And in the U S what's actually happened is, uh, the investment banking side of banking businesses has been doing better than they've ever done before. There's been the most unbelievable amount of acquisition activity. You've seen a lot of what's going on with the specs that's driving the res you know, deal based fee income for the banks, the volatility in the marketplace, meaning that trading income is much, much higher than it's ever been. And therefore the banks are very much seeing a profitability on that investment banking side. That was way ahead of what I think they were, they were expecting. Consumer business is definitely down. If you look at the credit card business, it's down, if you look at, uh, you know, lending activity, that's going down, going out, it's substantially less than where it was before. There's hardly any lending growth because the economy is flat at this moment in time. >>But again, the good news that, and I think this is a worldwide, but you're not just in the us. The good news here is that because of the liquidity and some of them are special mentions that government put out that there has not been, uh, the, the level of bankruptcies that people were expecting. Right. And that for most of the provisioning that the banks did, um, in expectation of non-performing loans has been, I think, a much more, much greater than what they're going to need, which is why you're starting to supervision is being released as well, which I kind of flattering, flattering the income flattering. I think going forward though, you're going to see a different picture. >>It's the, thank you for the clarification on the regional divergence is that you're right on, I mean, European central banks are, are not the same, the same position, uh, to, to affect liquidity, but is that nuance, is that variation across the globe? Is that, uh, is that a blind spot? Is that a, is that a, a concern, uh, or the other, other greater concerns, you know, inflation and, and, and the, the, the pace of the, the return to the economy. What are your thoughts on that? >>So I think, I think the, um, the, the, the concern, um, you know, as far as the European marketplace is concerned is, um, you know, whether the, the performance that in particularly, I don't think the level of Verition in there was quite as generous as we saw in other parts of the world. And therefore, um, you know, ease the issue around non-performing loans in, in Europe going to hold the European, uh, European banks back. And are they going to, you know, therefore constrained them under lending that they put into the economy. And that then, um, you know, reduces the level of economic growth that we see in Europe. Right. I think, I think that is certainly that is certainly a concern. Um, I would be surprised and I've been looking at, you know, forecasts that have been brought forward by various people around the world around infection. >>I would be surprised if inflation starts to become a genuine problem in the, in the kind of short to medium term. I think in the industry that are going to be two or three other things that are probably going to be more, you know, going to be more issues. Right. I think the first one, which is becoming top of mind for chief executives is this whole area around operational resiliency. So, you know, regulators universally are making very, very sure that banks do not have a technical debt or a complexity of legacy systems issue. They are. And, you know, the UK has taken the lead on this and they are going so far as even requiring non-executive directors to be liable. If banks are found to not have the right policies in place, this is not being followed by other regulators around the world. Right. So, so that is very much top of mind at this moment in time. >>So I think discretionary investment is going to be, uh, you know, to watch, um, uh, solving that particular problem. I think that that's one issue. I think the other issue is what the pandemic has shown is that, and, and, and this was very evident to me. I mean, I spent the last three years out in Singapore where, you know, banks have become very digital businesses. Right. When I came into the U S in my current role, it was somewhat surprising to me as to where the U S marketplace was in terms of digitization of banking. But if you look in the last 12 months, uh, you know, I think more has been achieved in terms of banks becoming digital businesses. And they've probably done in the last two or three years. Right. And then the real acceleration of that, uh, digitalization, which is going to continue to happen. But the downside of that has been that the threat to the banking industry from essentially fintechs and big decks has exactly, you know, it's really accelerated. Right, right. I mean, just to give you an example, pay Pat is the second largest financial services institution in the us, right. So that's become a real problem of my English. The banking industry is going to have to deal with, >>I want to come back to that, but now let's bring John into the conversation. Let's talk about the tech stack. Look, it was talking about whether it was resiliency going digital. We certainly saw with the pandemic remote work, huge, huge volumes of things like PPP and, and, and, and, and mortgages and with dropping rates, et cetera. So, John, how has the tech stack been altered in the past 14 months? >>Great question, Dave and it's top of mind for almost every single financial services firm, regardless of the sector within the overall industry, every single business has been taking stock of how they handled the pandemic and the economic conditions thereafter, and all of the business needs that were driven by the pandemic. In so many situations, firms were unable to service their clients or were not competitive in serving their clients. And as a result, they've had to do very deep, uh, uh, architectural, uh, transformation and digital transformation around their core platforms, their systems of analytics and their systems, their front end systems of engagement in terms of, uh, the core processing systems that many of these institutions, some in many cases, they're 50 years old. And with any 50 year old application platform, there are inherent limitations as an inflexibility and flexibility as an inability to innovate for the future as a speed of delivery issue. In, in other words, it can be very hard to accelerate delivery of new capabilities onto an aging platform. And so in every single case, um, institutions are looking to hybrid cloud and public cloud technology, and pre-packaged AI and pre-packaged solutions from an ISV ecosystem of software vendor ecosystem to say, as long as we can crack open many of these old monolithic cores and surround them with new digitization, new user experience that spans every channel and automation from the front to back of every interaction, that's where most institutions are prioritizing. Yep. >>Banks, aren't gonna migrate. Uh, they're gonna, they're going to build a abstraction layer. I want to come back to the disruption is so interesting. You had the Coinbase IPO last month, see Tesla and micro strategy. They're putting Bitcoin on their balance sheets. Jamie diamond says traditional banks are playing a smaller role in the financial system because of the new fintechs. Look at, you mentioned PayPal, the Stripe does Robin hood. You get the Silicon Valley giants have this dual disruptive disruption agenda, Apple, Amazon, even Walmart, Facebook. The question is, are traditional banks going to lose control of the payment systems? >>Yeah, I mean, I think to a large extent that is, that is already happened, right? Because I think if you look at, if you look at the experience in Asia, right, and you look at particularly organizations like iron financial, uh, you know, in India, you look at organizations like ATM the, you know, very substantial trends, particularly on the consumer payment side has actually moved, uh, away from the banks. And I think you're starting to see that in the West as well, right. With organizations like, you know, cloud. Now that's coming out with this, um, you know, pay, you know, buying out the later type of schemes. You've got and then, so you've got PayPal. And as you said, Stripe, uh, and, and others as well, but it's not just, um, you know, in the payment side. Right. I think, I think what's starting to happen is that, that are very core part of the banking business, you know, especially things like lending, for instance, where again, you are getting a number of these, um, fintechs and big, big tech companies entering the marketplace. >>And I, and I think the threat for the banks is, and this is not going to be small chunks of market share that you're going to actually lose. Right. It's, it's, it's actually, uh, it could actually be a Kodak moment. Let me give you an example. Uh, you know, you will have just seen that grab is going to be acquired by one of these facts for about $40 billion. I mean, this organization started like the Uber in Singapore. It very rapidly got into both the payment side, right? So it actually went to all of these mom and pop shops and it offered QR based, um, go out code based payment capabilities to these very small retailers. They were charging about half or a third of what MasterCard or visa were charging to run those payment routes. They took market share overnight. You look at the remittance business, right? >>They, they went into the remittance business, they set up these wallets in 28 countries around the ICR and region. They took huge chunks of business completely away from DBS, which is the local bank out there from Western union and all of these, all of these others. So, so I, I think it's a real threat. I think Jamie Dimon is saying what the banking industry has said always, right? Which is the reason we are losing is because the playing field is not even, this is not about playing fields and even right. All of these businesses have been subject to exactly the same regulation that the bank shop subject to regulations in Singapore and India, more onerous than maybe in other parts of the world. This is around the banking business, recognizing that this is a threat. And exactly, as John was saying, you got to get to delivering the customer experience. >>That juniors are wanting at the level of pasta they're prepared to pay. And you're not going to do that by purely shorting out the channels and having a cool app on somebody's smartphone. Right? If that smartphone is 48 by arcade processes and legacy systems, where can I apply? You know, like, like today, you know, you make a payment, your payment does not clear for five days, right? Whereas in Singapore I make a payment, the payment is instantaneously cleared, right? That's where the banking system is going to have to get to in order to get to that. You need to order the whole stack. And the really good news is there are many examples where this has been done very successfully by incumbent banks. You don't have to set up a digital bank on the side to do it. An incumbent bank could do it, and it can do it in a sense of a period of time, or does sense for level of investment. A lot of IBM's business across our consulting, as well as our, our technology stack is very much trying to do that with our clients. So I am personally very bullish about what the industry >>Yeah. I mean, taking friction out of the system sometimes with the case of crypto taking the middle person out of the system. But I think you guys are savvy. You understand that, you know, like, yeah, Jamie diamonds a couple of years ago said, he'd fire anybody doing crypto Janet Yellen and says, ah, I don't really get it. You know, Warren buffet. But I think as technology people, we look at it and say, okay, wait a minute. This is an interesting Petri dish. There's, there's fundamental technology here that has massive funding that is going to inform, you know, the future. I think, you know, big bags are gonna lean in some of them and others, others. Won't, uh, John, give you the last word here, >>But for sure they're leaning in. Uh, so to just, to, to, to think about, uh, uh, something that Likud said a moment ago, the reason these startups were able to innovate fast was because they didn't have the legacy. They didn't have the spaghetti lying around. They were able to be relentlessly laser focused on building new, using the API ecosystem, going straight to public and hybrid cloud and not worrying about everything that had been built for the last 50 years or so. The benefit for existing institutions, the incumbents is that they can use all of the same techniques and tools and hybrid cloud accelerators in terms. And we're not just thinking about, um, uh, retail banking here, your question around the industry, that disruption from Bitcoin, blockchain technologies, new ways of processing securities. It is playing out in every single securities processing and capital markets organization. Right now I'm working with several organizations right now, exactly on how to build custody systems, to take advantage of these non fungible digital assets. It's a hot, hot topic around which there's, uh, incredible, uh, appetite to invest an incredible appetite to innovate. And we know that the center of all these technologies are going to be cloud forward cloud ready, AI infused data infuse technologies. >>So I want to have you back. I wish you had more time. I want to talk about specs. I want to talk about NFTs. I want to talk about technology behind all this really great conversation and really appreciate your time. I'm sorry. We got to go. >>Thank you. Thanks so much indeed, for having us. >>Oh, really? Pleasure. Was mine. Thank you for watching everybody. This is Dave Volante for IBM. Think 2021. You're watching the cube.

Published Date : May 12 2021

SUMMARY :

Think 20, 21 brought to you by IBM, I mean, liquidity doesn't seem to be a problem for most banks these days. And also, you know, governments clearly have put worldwide a lot of liquidity into the, And I think Kim is a bit of a surprise to most, the specs that's driving the res you know, deal based fee income for the banks, But again, the good news that, and I think this is a worldwide, but you're not just in the us. I mean, European central banks are, are not the same, as far as the European marketplace is concerned is, um, you know, going to be more, you know, going to be more issues. So I think discretionary investment is going to be, uh, you know, So, John, how has the tech automation from the front to back of every interaction, that's where most You get the Silicon Valley giants have this dual disruptive disruption Because I think if you look at, And I, and I think the threat for the banks is, and this is not going to be small chunks of market same regulation that the bank shop subject to regulations in Singapore and India, You know, like, like today, you know, you make a payment, your payment does not clear for five days, that has massive funding that is going to inform, you know, the future. the incumbents is that they can use all of the same techniques and tools and hybrid cloud I wish you had more time. Thanks so much indeed, for having us. Thank you for watching everybody.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

DBSORGANIZATION

0.99+

WalmartORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jamie diamondPERSON

0.99+

five daysQUANTITY

0.99+

SingaporeLOCATION

0.99+

AsiaLOCATION

0.99+

IndiaLOCATION

0.99+

Dave VolantePERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Jamie DimonPERSON

0.99+

John DuigenanPERSON

0.99+

PayPalORGANIZATION

0.99+

UberORGANIZATION

0.99+

secondQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

48QUANTITY

0.99+

U SLOCATION

0.99+

about $40 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

John diagonalPERSON

0.99+

one issueQUANTITY

0.99+

last monthDATE

0.99+

Likhit WaglePERSON

0.99+

KimPERSON

0.99+

Janet YellenPERSON

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

TeslaORGANIZATION

0.99+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jamie diamondsPERSON

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.98+

CoinbaseORGANIZATION

0.98+

28 countriesQUANTITY

0.98+

ICRLOCATION

0.97+

50 year oldQUANTITY

0.97+

first quarterDATE

0.96+

about halfQUANTITY

0.96+

50 years oldQUANTITY

0.95+

pay PatORGANIZATION

0.95+

2021DATE

0.95+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.94+

first oneQUANTITY

0.93+

pandemicEVENT

0.93+

WigleyPERSON

0.93+

oneQUANTITY

0.92+

EuropeanOTHER

0.92+

single caseQUANTITY

0.88+

last 12 monthsDATE

0.87+

last three yearsDATE

0.87+

LikudORGANIZATION

0.85+

couple of years agoDATE

0.83+

ThinkCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.83+

past 14 monthsDATE

0.82+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.81+

MasterCardORGANIZATION

0.8+

three thingsQUANTITY

0.8+

KodakORGANIZATION

0.77+

Think 20COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.76+

last 50 yearsDATE

0.75+

iron financialORGANIZATION

0.74+

firstlyQUANTITY

0.74+

a thirdQUANTITY

0.73+

single businessQUANTITY

0.72+

UKORGANIZATION

0.7+

singleQUANTITY

0.68+

Breaking Analysis: Tech Spend Momentum but Mixed Rotation to the ‘Norm’


 

>> From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto and Boston, Bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> Recent survey data from ETR shows that enterprise tech spending is tracking with projected US GDP growth at six to 7% this year. Many markers continue to point the way to a strong recovery, including hiring trends and the loosening of frozen IT Project budgets. However skills shortages are blocking progress at some companies which bodes well for an increased reliance on external IT services. Moreover, while there's much talk about the rotation out of work from home plays and stocks such as video conferencing, VDI, and other remote worker tech, we see organizations still trying to figure out the ideal balance between funding headquarter investments that have been neglected and getting hybrid work right. In particular, the talent gap combined with a digital mandate, means companies face some tough decisions as to how to fund the future while serving existing customers and transforming culturally. Hello everyone, and welcome to this week's Wikibon CUBE's Insights powered by ETR. In this "Breaking Analysis", we welcome back Erik Porter Bradley of ETR who will share fresh data, perspectives and insights from the latest survey data. Erik, great to see you. Welcome. >> Thank you very much, Dave. Always good to see you and happy to be on the show again. >> Okay, we're going to share some macro data and then we're going to dig into some highlights from ETR's most recent March COVID survey and also the latest April data. So Erik, the first chart that we want to show, it shows CIO and IT buyer responses to expected IT spend for each quarter of 2021 versus 2020, and you can see here a steady quarterly improvement. Erik, what are the key takeaways, from your perspective? >> Sure, well, first of all, for everyone out there, this particular survey had a record-setting number of participation. We had a 1,500 IT decision makers participate and we had over half of the Fortune 500 and over a fifth of the Global 1000. So it was a really good survey. This is seventh iteration of the COVID Impact Survey specifically, and this is going to transition to an overlarge macro survey going forward so we can continue it. And you're 100% right, what we've been tracking here since March of last year was, how is spending being impacted because of COVID? Where is it shifting? And what we're seeing now finally is that there is a real re-acceleration in spend. I know we've been a little bit more cautious than some of the other peers out there that just early on slapped an eight or a 9% number, but what we're seeing is right now, it's at a midpoint of over six, about 6.7% and that is accelerating. So, we are still hopeful that that will continue, and really, that spending is going to be in the second half of the year. As you can see on the left part of this chart that we're looking at, it was about 1.7% versus 3% for Q1 spending year-over-year. So that is starting to accelerate through the back half. >> I think it's prudent to be cautious (indistinct) 'cause normally you'd say, okay, tech is going to grow a couple of points higher than GDP, but it's really so hard to predict this year. Okay, the next chart here that we want to show you is we asked respondents to indicate what strategies they're employing in the short term as a result of coronavirus and you can see a few things that I'll call out and then I'll ask Erik to chime in. First, there's been no meaningful change of course, no surprise in tactics like remote work and holding travel, however, we're seeing very positive trends in other areas trending downward, like hiring freezes and freezing IT deployments, a downward trend in layoffs, and we also see an increase in the acceleration of new IT deployments and in hiring. Erik, what are your key takeaways? >> Well, first of all, I think it's important to point out here that we're also capturing that people believe remote work productivity is still increasing. Now, the trajectory might be coming down a little bit, but that is really key, I think, to the backdrop of what's happening here. So people have a perception that productivity of remote work is better than hybrid work and that's from the IT decision makers themselves, but what we're seeing here is that, most importantly, these organizations are citing plans to increase hiring, and that's something that I think is really important to point out. It's showing a real following, and to your point right in the beginning of the intro, we are seeing deployments stabilize versus prior survey levels, which means early on, they had no plans to launch new tech deployments, then they said, "Nope, we're going to start." and now that stalling, and I think it's exactly right, what you said, is there's an IT skills shortage. So people want to continue to do IT deployments 'cause they have to support work from home and a hybrid back return to the office, but they just don't have the skills to do so, and I think that's really probably the most important takeaway from this chart, is that stalling and to really ask why it's stalling. >> Yeah, so we're going to get into that for sure, and I think that's a really key point, is that accelerating IT deployments, it looks like it's hit a wall in the survey, but before we get deep into the skills, let's take a look at this next chart, and we're asking people here how our return to the new normal, if you will, and back to offices is going to change spending with on-prem architectures and applications. And so the first two bars, they're Cloud-friendly, if you add them up, it's 63% of the respondents, say that either they'll stay in the Cloud for the most part, or they're going to lower their on-prem spend when they go back to the office. The next three bars are on-prem friendly. If you add those up it's 29% of the respondents say their on-prem spend is going to bounce back to pre-COVID levels or actually increase, and of course, 12% of that number, by the way, say they've never altered their on-prem spend. So Erik, no surprise, but this bodes well for Cloud, but isn't it also a positive for on-prem? We've had this dual funding premise, meaning Cloud continues to grow, but neglected data center spend also gets a boost. What's your thoughts? >> Really, it's interesting. It's people are spending on all fronts. You and I were talking in the prep, it's like we're in battle and I've got naval, I've got air, I've got land, I've got to spend on Cloud and digital transformation, but I also have to spend for on-prem. The hybrid work is here and it needs to be supported. So this is spending is going to increase. When you look at this chart, you're going to see though, that roughly 36% of all respondents say that their spending is going to remain mostly on Cloud. So that is still the clear direction, digital transformation is still happening, COVID accelerated it greatly, you and I, as journalists and researchers already know this is where the puck is going, but spend has always lagged a little bit behind 'cause it just takes some time to get there. Inversely, 27% said that their on-prem spending will decrease. So when you look at those two, I still think that the trend is the friend for Cloud spending, even though, yes, they do have to continue spending on hybrid, some of it's been neglected, there are refresh cycles coming up, so, overall it just points to more and more spending right now. It really does seem to be a very strong backdrop for IT growth. >> So I want to talk a little bit about the ETR taxonomy before we bring up the next chart. We get a lot of questions about this, and of course, when you do a massive survey like you're doing, you have to have consistency for time series, so you have to really think through what the buckets look like, if you will. So this next chart takes a look at the ETR taxonomy and it breaks it down into simple-to-understand terms. So the green is the portion of spending on a vendor's tech within a category that is accelerating, and the red is the portion that is decelerating. So Erik, what are the key messages in this data? >> Well, first of all, Dave, thank you so much for pointing that out. We used to do, just what we call a Net score. It's a proprietary formula that we use to determine the overall velocity of spending. Some people found it confusing. Our data scientists decided to break this sector, break down into what you said, which is really more of a mode analysis. In that sector, how many of the vendors are increasing versus decreasing? So again, I just appreciate you bringing that up and allowing us to explain the reasoning behind our analysis there. But what we're seeing here goes back to something you and I did last year when we did our predictions, and that was that IT services and consulting was going to have a true rebound in 2021, and that's what this is showing right here. So in this chart, you're going to see that consulting and services are really continuing their recovery, 2020 had a lot of the clients and they have the biggest sector year-over-year acceleration sector wise. The other thing to point out on this, which we'll get to again later, is that the inverse analysis is true for video conferencing. We will get to that, so I'm going to leave a little bit of ammunition behind for that one, but what we're seeing here is IT consulting services being the real favorable and video conferencing having a little bit more trouble. >> Great, okay, and then let's take a look at that services piece, and this next chart really is a drill down into that space and emphasizes, Erik, what you were just talking about. And we saw this in IBM's earnings, where still more than 60% of IBM's business comes from services and the company beat earnings, in part, due to services outperforming expectations, I think it had a somewhat easier compare and some of this pent-up demand that we've been talking about bodes well for IBM and other services companies, it's not just IBM, right, Erik? >> No, it's not, but again, I'm going to point out that you and I did point out IBM in our predictions when we did in late December, so, it is nice to see. One of the reasons we don't have a more favorable rating on IBM at the moment is because they are in the process of spinning out this large unit, and so there's a little bit of a corporate action there that keeps us off on the sideline. But I would also want to point out here, Tata, Infosys and Cognizant 'cause they're seeing year-over-year acceleration in both IT consulting and outsourced IT services. So we break those down separately and those are the three names that are seeing acceleration in both of those. So again, at the Tata, Infosys and Cognizant are all looking pretty well positioned as well. >> So we've been talking a little bit about this skills shortage, and this is what's, I think, so hard for forecasters, is that in the one hand, There's a lot of pent up demand, Scott Gottlieb said it's like Woodstock coming out of the COVID, but on the other hand, if you have a talent gap, you've got to rely on external services. So there's a learning curve, there's a ramp up, it's an external company, and so it takes time to put those together. So this data that we're going to show you next, is really important in my view and ties what we were saying at the top. It asks respondents to comment on their staffing plans. The light blue is "We're increasing staff", the gray is "No change" and the magenta or whatever, whatever color that is that sort of purplish color, anyway, that color is decreasing, and the picture is very positive across the board. Full-time staff, offshoring, contract employees, outsourced professional services, all up trending upwards, and this Erik is more evidence of the services bounce back. >> Yeah, it's certainly, yes, David, and what happened is when we caught this trend, we decided to go one level deeper and say, all right, we're seeing this, but we need to know why, and that's what we always try to do here. Data will tell you what's happening, it doesn't always tell you why, and that's one of the things that ETR really tries to dig in with through the insights, interviews panels, and also going direct with these more custom survey questions. So in this instance, I think the real takeaway is that 30% of the respondents said that their outsourced and managed services are going to increase over the next three months. That's really powerful, that's a large portion of organizations in a very short time period. So we're capturing that this acceleration is happening right now and it will be happening in real time, and I don't see it slowing down. You and I are speaking about we have to increase Cloud spend, we have to increase hybrid spend, there are refresh cycles coming up, and there's just a real skills shortage. So this is a long-term setup that bodes very well for IT services and consulting. >> You know, Erik, when I came out of college, somebody told me, "Read, read, read, read as much as you can." And then they said, "Read the Wall Street Journal every day." and so I did it, and I would read the tech magazines and back then it was all paper, and what happens is you begin to connect the dots. And so the reason I bring that up is because I've now taken a bath in the ETR data for the better part of two years and I'm beginning to be able to connect the dots. The data is not always predictive, but many, many times it is. And so this next data gets into the fun stuff where we name names. A lot of times people don't like it because they're either marketing people at organizations, say, "Well, data's wrong." because that's the first thing they do, is attack the data. But you and I know, we've made some really great calls, work from home, for sure, you're talking about the services bounce back. We certainly saw the rise of CrowdStrike, Okta, Zscaler, well before people were talking about that, same thing with video conferencing. And so, anyway, this is the fun stuff and it looks at positive versus negative sentiment on companies. So first, how does ETR derive this data and how should we interpret it, and what are some of your takeaways? >> Sure, first of all, how we derive the data, are systematic survey responses that we do on a quarterly basis, and we standardize those responses to allow for time series analysis so we can do trend analysis as well. We do find that our data, because it's talking about forward-looking spending intentions, is really more predictive because we're talking about things that might be happening six months, three months in the future, not things that a lot of other competitors and research peers are looking at things that already happened, they're looking in the past, ETR really likes to look into the future and our surveys are set up to do so. So thank you for that question, It's a enjoyable lead in, but to get to the fun stuff, like you said, what we do here is we put ratings on the datasets. I do want to put the caveat out there that our spending intentions really only captures top-line revenue. It is not indicative of profit margin or any other line items, so this is only to be viewed as what we are rating the data set itself, not the company, that's not what we're in the game of doing. So I think that's very important for the marketing and the vendors out there themselves when they take a look at this. We're just talking about what we can control, which is our data. We're going to talk about a few of the names here on this highlighted vendors list. One, we're going to go back to that you and I spoke about, I guess, about six months ago, or maybe even earlier, which was the observability space. You and I were noticing that it was getting very crowded, a lot of new entrants, there was a lot of acquisition from more of the legacy or standard players in the space, and that is continuing. So I think in a minute, we're going to move into that observability space, but what we're seeing there is that it's becoming incredibly crowded and we're possibly seeing signs of them cannibalizing each other. We're also going to move on a little bit into video conferencing, where we're capturing some spend deceleration, and then ultimately, we're going to get into a little bit of a storage refresh cycle and talk about that. But yeah, these are the highlighted vendors for April, we usually do this once a quarter and they do change based on the data, but they're not usually whipsawed around, the data doesn't move that quickly. >> Yeah, so you can see some of the big names in the left-hand side, some of the SAS companies that have momentum. Obviously, ServiceNow has been doing very, very well. We've talked a lot about Snowflake, Okta, CrowdStrike, Zscaler, all very positive, as well as several others. I guess I'd add some things. I mean, I think if thinking about the next decade, it's Cloud, which is not going to be like the same Cloud as the last decade, a lot of machine learning and deep learning and AI and the Cloud is extending to the edge and the data center. Data, obviously, very important, data is decentralized and distributed, so data architectures are changing. A lot of opportunities to connect across Clouds and actually create abstraction layers, and then something that we've been covering a lot is processor performance is actually accelerating relative to Moore's law. It's probably instead of doubling every two years, it's quadrupling every two years, and so that is a huge factor, especially as it relates to powering AI and AI inferencing at the edge. This is a whole new territory, custom Silicon is really becoming in vogue and so something that we're watching very, very closely. >> Yeah, I completely, agree on that and I do think that the next version of Cloud will be very different. Another thing to point out on that too, is you can't do anything that you're talking about without collecting the data and organizations are extremely serious about that now. It seems it doesn't matter what industry they're in, every company is a data company, and that also bodes well for the storage goal. We do believe that there is going to just be a huge increase in the need for storage, and yes, hopefully that'll become portable across multi-Cloud and hybrid as well. >> Now, as Erik said, the ETR data, it's really focused on that top-line spend. So if you look on the right side of that chart, you saw NetApp was kind of negative, was very negative, right? But it is a company that's in transformation now, they've lowered expectations and they've recently beat expectations, that's why the stock has been doing better, but at the macro, from a spending standpoint, it's still stout challenged. So you have big footprint companies like NetApp and Oracle is another one. Oracle's stock is at an all time high, but the spending relative to sort of previous cycles are relative to, like for instance, Snowflake, much, much smaller, not as high growth, but they're managing expectations, they're managing their transition, they're managing profitability. Zoom is another one, Zoom looking negative, but Zoom's got to use its market cap now to transform and increase its TAM. And then Splunk is another one we're going to talk about. Splunk is in transition, it acquired SignalFX, It just brought on this week, Teresa Carlson, who was the head of AWS Public Sector. She's the president and head of sales, so they've got a go-to-market challenge and they brought in Teresa Carlson to really solve that, but Splunk has been trending downward, we called that several quarters ago, Erik, and so I want to bring up the data on Splunk, and this is Splunk, Erik, in analytics, and it's not trending in the right direction. The green is accelerating spend, the red is in the bars is decelerating spend, the top blue line is spending velocity or Net score, and the yellow line is market share or pervasiveness in the dataset. Your thoughts. >> Yeah, first I want to go back. There's a great point, Dave, about our data versus a disconnect from an equity analysis perspective. I used to be an equity analyst, that is not what we do here. And the main word you said is expectations, right? Stocks will trade on how they do compare to the expectations that are set, whether that's buy-side expectations, sell-side expectations or management's guidance themselves. We have no business in tracking any of that, what we are talking about is the top-line acceleration or deceleration. So, that was a great point to make, and I do think it's an important one for all of our listeners out there. Now, to move to Splunk, yes, I've been capturing a lot of negative commentary on Splunk even before the data turns. So this has been a about a year-long, our analysis and review on this name and I'm dating myself here, but I know you and I are both rock and roll fans, so I'm going to point out a Led Zeppelin song and movie, and say that the song remains the same for Splunk. We are just seeing recent spending attentions are taking yet another step down, both from prior survey levels, from year ago levels. This, we're looking at in the analytics sector and spending intentions are decelerating across every single group, and we went to one of our other slide analysis on the ETR+ platform, and you do by customer sub-sample, in analytics, it's dropping in every single vertical. It doesn't matter which one. it's really not looking good, unfortunately, and you had mentioned this is an analytics and I do believe the next slide is an information security. >> Yeah, let's bring that up. >> And unfortunately it's not doing much better. So this is specifically Fortune 500 accounts and information security. There's deep pockets in the Fortune 500, but from what we're hearing in all the insights and interviews and panels that I personally moderate for ETR, people are upset, that they didn't like the strong tactics that Splunk has used on them in the past, they didn't like the ingestion model pricing, the inflexibility, and when alternatives came along, people are willing to look at the alternatives, and that's what we're seeing in both analytics and big data and also for their SIM and security. >> Yeah, so I think again, I pointed Teresa Carlson. She's got a big job, but she's very capable. She's going to meet with a lot of customers, she's a go-to-market pro, she's going to to have to listen hard, and I think you're going to see some changes there. Okay, so sorry, there's more bad news on Splunk. So (indistinct) bring this up is Net score for Splunk and Elastic accounts. This is for analytics, so there's 106 Elastic accounts in the dataset that also have Splunk and it's trending downward for Splunk, that's why it's green for Elastic. And Erik, the important call out from ETR here is how Splunk's performance in Elastic accounts compares with its performance overall. The ELK stack, which obviously Elastic is a big part of that, is causing pain for Splunk, as is Datadog, and you mentioned the pricing issue, well, is it pricing in your assessment or is it more fundamental? >> It's multi-level based on the commentary we get from our ITDMs teams that take the survey. So yes, you did a great job with this analysis. What we're looking at is the spending within shared accounts. So if I have Splunk already, how am I spending? I'm sorry if I have Elastic already, how am I spending on Splunk? And what you're seeing here is it's down to about a 12% Net score, whereas Splunk overall, has a 32% Net score among all of its customers. So what you're seeing there is there is definitely a drain that's happening where Elastic is draining spend from Splunk and usage from them. The reason we used Elastic here is because all observabilities, the whole sector seems to be decelerating. Splunk is decelerating the most, but Elastic is the only one that's actually showing resiliency, so that's why we decided to choose these two, but you pointed out, yes, it's also Datadog. Datadog is Cloud native. They're more dev ops-oriented. They tend to be viewed as having technological lead as compared to Splunk. So a really good point. Dynatrace also is expanding their abilities and Splunk has been making a lot of acquisitions to push their Cloud services, they are also changing their pricing model, right? They're trying to make things a little bit more flexible, moving off ingestion and moving towards consumption. So they are trying, and the new hires, I'm not going to bet against them because the one thing that Splunk has going for them is their market share in our survey, they're still very well entrenched. So they do have a lot of accounts, they have their foothold. So if they can find a way to make these changes, then they will be able to change themselves, but the one thing I got to say across the whole sector is competition is increasing, and it does appear based on commentary and data that they're starting to cannibalize themselves. It really seems pretty hard to get away from that, and you know there are startups in the observability space too that are going to be even more disruptive. >> I think I want to key on the pricing for a moment, and I've been pretty vocal about this. I think the old SAS pricing model where you essentially lock in for a year or two years or three years, pay up front, or maybe pay quarterly if you're lucky, that's a one-way street and I think it's a flawed model. I like what Snowflake's doing, I like what Datadog's doing, look at what Stripe is doing, look at what Twilio is doing, you mentioned it, it's consumption-based pricing, and if you've got a great product, put it out there and damn, the torpedoes, and I think that is a game changer. I look at, for instance, HPE with GreenLake, I look at Dell with Apex, they're trying to mimic that model and apply it to infrastructure, it's much harder with infrastructure 'cause you've got to deploy physical infrastructure, but that is a model that I think is going to change, and I think all of the traditional SAS pricing is going to come under disruption over the next better part of the decades, but anyway, let's move on. We've been covering the APM space pretty extensively, application performance management, and this chart lines up some of the big players here. Comparing Net score or spending momentum from the April 20th survey, the gray is, sorry, the gray is the April 20th survey, the blue is Jan 21 and the yellow is April 21, and not only are Elastic and Datadog doing well relative to Splunk, Erik, but everything is down from last year. So this space, as you point out, is undergoing a transformation. >> Yeah, the pressures are real and it's sort of that perfect storm where it's not only the data that's telling us that, but also the direct feedback we get from the community. Pretty much all the interviews I do, I've done a few panels specifically on this topic, for anyone who wants to dive a little bit deeper. We've had some experts talk about this space and there really is no denying that there is a deceleration in spend and it's happening because that spend is getting spread out among different vendors. People are using a Datadog for certain aspects, they are using Elastic where they can 'cause it's cheaper. They're using Splunk because they have to, but because it's so expensive, they're cutting some of the things that they're putting into Splunk, which is dangerous, particularly on the security side. If I have to decide what to put in and whatnot, that's not really the right way to have security hygiene. So this space is just getting crowded, there's disruptive vendors coming from the emerging space as well, and what you're seeing here is the only bit of positivity is Elastic on a survey-over-survey basis with a slight, slight uptick. Everywhere else, year-over-year and survey-over-survey, it's showing declines, it's just hard to ignore. >> And then you've got Dynatrace who, based on the interviews you do in the (indistinct), one-on-one, or one-on-five, the private interviews that I've been invited to, Dynatrace gets very high scores for their roadmap. You've got New Relic, which has been struggling financially, but they've got a really good product and a purpose-built database just for this APM space, and then of course, you've got Cisco with AppD, which is a strong business for them, and then as you mentioned, you've got startups coming in, you got ChaosSearch, which Ed Walsh is now running, leave the data in place in AWS and really interesting model, Honeycomb is getting really disruptive, Jeremy Burton's company, Observed. So this space is it's becoming jumped ball. >> Yeah, there's a great line that came out of one of them, and that was that the lines are blurring. It used to be that you knew exactly that AppDynamics, what they were doing, it was APM only, or it was logging and monitoring only, and a lot of what I'm hearing from the ITDM experts is that the lines are blurring amongst all of these names. They all have functionality that kind of crosses over each other. And the other interesting thing is it used to be application versus infrastructure monitoring, but as you know, infrastructure is becoming code more and more and more, and as infrastructure becomes code, there's really no difference between application and infrastructure monitoring. So we're seeing a convergence and a blurring of the lines in this space, which really doesn't bode well, and a great point about New Relic, their tech gets good remarks. I just don't know if their enterprise level service and sales is up to snuff right now. As one of my experts said, a CTO of a very large public online hospitality company essentially said that he would be shocked that within 18 months if all of these players are still standalone, that there needs to be some M and A or convergence in this space. >> Okay, now we're going to call out some of the data that really has jumped out to ETR in the latest survey, and some of the names that are getting the most queries from ETR clients, many of which are investor clients. So let's start by having a look at one of the most important and prominent work from home names, Zoom. Let's look at this. Erik is the ride over for Zoom? >> Ah, I've been saying it for a little bit of a time now actually. I do believe it is, and we'll get into it, but again, pointing out, great, Dave, the reason we're presenting today Splunk, Elastic and Zoom, they are the most viewed on the ETR+ platform. Trailing behind that only slightly is F5, I decided not to bring F5 to the table today 'cause we don't have a rating on the data set. So then I went one deep, one below that and it's pure. So the reason we're presenting these to you today is that these are the ones that our clients and our community are most interested in, which is hopefully going to gain interest to your viewers as well. So to get to Zoom, yeah, I call Zoom the pandemic bull market baby. This was really just one that had a meteoric ride. You look back, January in 2020, the stock was at $60 and 10 months later, it was like 580, that's in 10 months. That's cooled down a little bit into the mid-300s, and I believe that cooling down should continue, and the reason why is because we are seeing huge deceleration in our spending intentions. They're hitting all-time lows, it's really just a very ugly dataset. More importantly than the spending intentions, for the first time, we're seeing customer growth in our survey flatten. In the past, we knew that the deceleration of spend was happening, but meanwhile, their new customer growth was accelerating, so it was kind of hard to really make any call based on that. This is the first time we're seeing flattening customer growth trajectory, and that in tandem with just dominance from Microsoft in every sector they're involved in, I don't care if it's IP telephony, productivity apps or the core video conferencing, Microsoft is just dominating. So there's really just no way to ignore this anymore. The data and the commentary state that Zoom is facing some headwinds. >> Well, plus you've pointed out to me that a lot of your private conversations with buyers says that, "Hey, we're, we're using the freebie version of Zoom, and we're not paying them." And that combined with Teams, I mean, it's... I think, look, Zoom, they've got to figure out how to use their elevated market cap to transform and expand their TAM, but let's move on. Here's the data on Pure Storage and we've highlighted a number of times this company is showing elevated spending intentions. Pure announced it's earnings in May, IBM just announced storage, it was way down actually. So still, Pure, more positive, but I'll on that comment in a moment, but what does this data tell you, Erik? >> Yeah, right now we started seeing this data last survey in January, and that was the first time we really went positive on the data set itself, and it's just really continuing. So we're seeing the strongest year-over-year acceleration in the entire survey, which is a really good spot to be. Pure is also a leading position among its sector peers, and the other thing that was pretty interesting from the data set is among all storage players, Pure has the highest positive public Cloud correlation. So what we can do is we can see which respondents are accelerating their public Cloud spend and then cross-reference that with their storage spend and Pure is best positioned. So as you and I both know, digital transformation Cloud spending is increasing, you need to be aligned with that. And among all storage sector peers, Pure is best positioned in all of those, in spending intentions and adoptions and also public Cloud correlation. So yet again, to start another really strong dataset, and I have an anecdote about why this might be happening, because when I saw the data, I started asking in my interviews, what's going on here? And there was one particular person, he was a director of Cloud operations for a very large public tech company. Now, they have hybrid, but their data center is in colo, So they don't own and build their own physical building. He pointed out that during COVID, his company wanted to increase storage, but he couldn't get into his colo center due to COVID restrictions. They weren't allowed. You had 250,000 square feet, right, but you're only allowed to have six people in there. So it's pretty hard to get to your rack and get work done. He said he would buy storage, but then the colo would say, "Hey, you got to get it out of here. It's not even allowed to sit here. We don't want it in our facility." So he has all this pent up demand. In tandem with pent up demand, we have a refresh cycle. The SSD depreciation cycle is ending. SSDs are moving on and we're starting to see a new technology in that space, NVMe sorry, technology increasing in that space. So we have pent up demand and we have new technology and that's really leading to a refresh cycle, and this particular ITDM that I spoke to and many of his peers think this has a long tailwind that storage could be a good sector for some time to come. >> That's really interesting, thank you for that extra metadata. And I want to do a little deeper dive on storage. So here's a look at storage in the industry in context and some of the competitive. I mean, it's been a tough market for the reasons that we've highlighted, Cloud has been eating away that flash headroom. It used to be you'd buy storage to get more spindles and more performance and we're sort of forced to buy more, flash, gave more headroom, but it's interesting what you're saying about the depreciation cycle. So that's good news. So ETR combines, just for people's benefit here, combines primary and secondary storage into a single category. So you have companies like Pure and NetApp, which are really pure play primary storage companies, largely in the sector, along with Veeam, Cohesity and Rubrik, which are kind of secondary data or data protection. So my quick thoughts here that Pure is elevated and remains what I call the one-eyed man in the land of the blind, but that's positive tailwinds there, so that's good news. Rubrik is very elevated but down, it's big competitor, Cohesity is way off its highs, and I have to say to me, Veeam is like the Steady Eddy consistent player here. They just really continue to do well in the data protection business, and the highs are steady, the lows are steady. Dell is also notable, they've been struggling in storage. Their ISG business, which comprises servers and storage, it's been softer in COVID, and during even this new product rollout, so it's notable with this new mid range they have in particular, the uptick in Dell, this survey, because Dell is so large, a small uptick can be very good for Dell. HPE has a big announcement next month in storage, so that might improve based on a product cycle. Of course, the Nimble brand continues to do well, IBM, as I said, just announced a very soft quarter, down double digits again, and they're in a product cycle shift. And NetApp, it looks bad in the ETR data from a spending momentum standpoint, but their management team is transforming the company into a Cloud play, which Erik is why it was interesting that Pure has the greatest momentum in Cloud accounts, so that is sort of striking to me. I would have thought it would be NetApp, so that's something that we want to pay attention to, but I do like a lot of what NetApp is doing, and other than Pure, they're the only big kind of pure play in primary storage. So long-winded, intro there, Erik, but anything you'd add? >> No, actually I appreciate it as long-winded. I'm going to be honest with you, storage is not my best sector as far as a researcher and analyst goes, but I actually think that a lot of what you said is spot on. We do capture a lot of large organizations spend, we don't capture much mid and small, so I think when you're talking about these large, large players like NetApp not looking so good, all I would state is that we are capturing really big organization spending attention, so these are names that should be doing better to be quite honest, in those accounts, and at least according to our data, we're not seeing it in. It's longterm depression, as you can see, NetApp now has a negative spending velocity in this analysis. So, I can go dig around a little bit more, but right now the names that I'm hearing are Pure, Cohesity. I'm hearing a little bit about Hitachi trying to reinvent themselves in the space, but I'll take a wait-and-see approach on that one, but pure Cohesity are the ones I'm hearing a lot from our community. >> So storage is transforming to Cloud as a service. You've seen things like Apex in GreenLake from Dell and HPE and container storage. A little, so not really a lot of people paying attention to it, but Pure bought a company called Portworx which really specializes in container storage, and there's many startups there, they're trying to really change the way. David Flynn, has a startup in that space, he's the guy who started Fusion-io. So a lot of transformations happening here. Okay, I know it's been a long segment, we have to summarize, and let me go through a summary and then I'll give you the last word, Erik. So tech spending appears to be tracking US GDP at 6 to 7%. This talent shortage could be a blocker to accelerating IT deployments, so that's kind of good news actually for services companies. Digital transformation, it remains a priority, and that bodes, well, not only for services, but automation. UiPath went public this week, we profiled that extensively, that went public last Wednesday. Organizations that sit at the top face some tough decisions on how to allocate resources. They're running the business, growing the business, transforming the business, and we're seeing a bifurcation of spending and some residual effects on vendors, and that remains a theme that we're watching. Erik, your final thoughts. >> Yeah, I'm going to go back quickly to just the overall macro spending, 'cause there's one thing I think is interesting to point out and we're seeing a real acceleration among mid and small. So it seems like early on in the COVID recovery or COVID spending, it was the deep pockets that moved first, right? Fortune 500 knew they had to support remote work, they started spending first. Around that in the Fortune 500, we're only seeing about 5% spend, but when you get into mid and small organizations, that's creeping up to eight, nine. So I just think it's important to point out that they're playing catch up right now. I also would point out that this is heavily skewed to North America spending. We're seeing laggards in EMEA, they just don't seem to be spending as much. They're in a very different place in their recovery, and I do think that it's important to point that out. Lastly, I also want to mention, I know you do such a great job on following a lot of the disruptive vendors that you just pointed out, with Pure doing container storage, we also have another bi-annual survey that we do called Emerging Technology, and that's for the private names. That's going to be launching in May, for everyone out there who's interested in not only the disruptive vendors, but also private equity players. Keep an eye out for that. We do that twice a year and that's growing in its respondents as well. And then lastly, one comment, because you mentioned the UiPath IPO, it was really hard for us to sit on the sidelines and not put some sort of rating on their dataset, but ultimately, the data was muted, unfortunately, and when you're seeing this kind of hype into an IPO like we saw with Snowflake, the data was resoundingly strong. We had no choice, but to listen to what the data said for Snowflake, despite the hype. We didn't see that for UiPath and we wanted to, and I'm not making a large call there, but I do think it's interesting to juxtapose the two, that when snowflake was heading to its IPO, the data was resoundingly positive, and for UiPath, we just didn't see that. >> Thank you for that, and Erik, thanks for coming on today. It's really a pleasure to have you, and so really appreciate the collaboration and look forward to doing more of these. >> Yeah, we enjoy the partnership greatly, Dave. We're very happy to have you on the ETR family and looking forward to doing a lot, lot more with you in the future. >> Ditto. Okay, that's it for today. Remember, these episodes are all available as podcasts wherever you listen. All you have to do is search "Breaking Analysis" podcast, and please subscribe to the series. Check out ETR website it's etr.plus. We also publish a full report every week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com. You can email me, david.vellante@siliconangle.com, you can DM me on Twitter @dvellante or comment on our LinkedIn posts. I could see you in Clubhouse. This is Dave Vellante for Erik Porter Bradley for the CUBE Insights powered by ETR. Have a great week, stay safe, be well and we'll see you next time. (bright music)

Published Date : Apr 23 2021

SUMMARY :

This is "Breaking Analysis" out the ideal balance Always good to see you and and also the latest April data. and really, that spending is going to be that we want to show you and that's from the IT that number, by the way, So that is still the clear direction, and the red is the portion is that the inverse analysis and the company beat earnings, One of the reasons we don't is that in the one hand, is that 30% of the respondents said a bath in the ETR data and the vendors out there themselves and the Cloud is extending and that also bodes well and the yellow line is and say that the song hearing in all the insights in the dataset that also have Splunk but the one thing I got to and the yellow is April 21, and it's sort of that perfect storm and then as you mentioned, and a blurring of the lines and some of the names that and the reason why is Here's the data on Pure and the other thing that and some of the competitive. is that we are capturing Organizations that sit at the and that's for the private names. and so really appreciate the collaboration and looking forward to doing and please subscribe to the series.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
ErikPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

David FlynnPERSON

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

April 20thDATE

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

AprilDATE

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

Erik Porter BradleyPERSON

0.99+

ApexORGANIZATION

0.99+

MayDATE

0.99+

April 21DATE

0.99+

Scott GottliebPERSON

0.99+

Jan 21DATE

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

2021DATE

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

12%QUANTITY

0.99+

ETRORGANIZATION

0.99+

JanuaryDATE

0.99+

29%QUANTITY

0.99+

SplunkORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeremy BurtonPERSON

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

NetAppORGANIZATION

0.99+

63%QUANTITY

0.99+

TwilioORGANIZATION

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

two yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

PortworxORGANIZATION

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

9%QUANTITY

0.99+

UiPathORGANIZATION

0.99+

HitachiORGANIZATION

0.99+

HPEORGANIZATION

0.99+

250,000 square feetQUANTITY

0.99+

eightQUANTITY

0.99+

six peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

a yearQUANTITY

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

3%QUANTITY

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

DatadogORGANIZATION

0.99+

StripeORGANIZATION

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

PureORGANIZATION

0.99+

New RelicORGANIZATION

0.99+