Kate Hall Slade, dentsu & Flo Ye, dentsu | UiPath Forward5
>>The Cube Presents UI Path Forward five. Brought to you by UI Path. >>Welcome back to the Cube's Coverage of Forward five UI Path Customer event. This is the fourth forward that we've been at. We started in Miami, had some great events. It's all about the customer stories. Dave Valante with Dave Nicholson, Flow Yees here. She's the director of engineering and development at dsu and Kate Hall is to her right. And Kate is the director of Automation Solutions at dsu. Ladies, welcome to the Cube. Thanks so much. Thanks >>You to >>Be here. Tell us about dsu. You guys are huge company, but but give us the focus. >>Yeah, absolutely. Dentsu, it's one of the largest advertising networks out there. One of the largest in the world with over 66,000 employees and we're operating in a hundred plus countries. We're really proud to serve 95% of the Fortune 100 companies. Household names like Microsoft Factor and Gamble. If you seen the Super Bowls ads last year, Larry, Larry Davids ads for the crypto brand. That's a hilarious one for anyone who haven't seen it. So we're just really proud to be here and we really respect the creatives of our company. >>That was the best commercial, the Super Bowl by far. For sure. I, I said at the top of saying that Dave and I were talking UI pass, a cool company. You guys kinda look like cool people. You got cool jobs. Tell, tell us about your respective roles. What do you guys do? Yeah, >>Absolutely, absolutely. Well, I'm the director of engineering and automation, so what I really do is to implement the automation operating model and connecting developers across five continents together, making sure that we're delivering and deploying automation projects up to our best standards setting by the operating model. So it's a really, really great job. And when we get to see all these brilliant minds across the world >>And, And Kate, what's your role? Yeah, >>And the Automation Solutions vertical that I head up, the focus is really on converting business requirements into technical designs for flows, developers to deliver. So making sure that we are managing our pipeline, sourcing the right ideas, prioritizing them according to the business businesses objectives and making sure that we route them to the right place. So is it, does it need to be an automation first? Do we need to optimize the process? Does this make sense for citizen developers or do we need to bring in the professional resources on flow's >>Team? So you're bilingual, you speak, you're like the translator, you speak geek and wall, right? Is that fair? Okay. So take me back to the, let's, let's do a little mini case study here. How did you guys get started? I'm always interested, was this a top down? Is, is is top down required to be successful? Cuz it does feel like you can have bottom up bottoms up with rpa, but, but how did you guys get started? What was the journey like? >>Yeah, we started back in 2017, very traditional top down approach. So we delivered a couple POCs working directly with UiPath. You know, going back those five years, delivered those really highly scalable top down solutions that drove hundreds of thousands of hours of ROI for the business. However, as people kind of began to embrace automation and they learned that this is something that they could, that could help them, it's not something that they should be afraid of to take away their jobs. You know, DSU is a young company with a lot of young, young creatives. They wanna make their lives better. So we were absolutely inundated with all of these use cases of, hey I, I need a bot to do this. I need a bot to do that i's gonna save me, you know, 10 hours a week. It's gonna save my team a hundred hours a month, et cetera, et cetera. All of these smaller use cases that were gonna be hugely impactful for the individuals, their teams, even in entire department, but didn't have that scalable ROI for us to put professional development resources against it. So starting in 2020 we really introduced the citizen development program to put the power into those people's hands so that they could create their own solutions. And that was really just a snowball effect to tackle it from the bottom up as well as the top down. >>So a lot of young people, Dave, they not not threatened by robots that racing it. So >>They've grown up with the technology, they know that they can order an Uber from their phone, right? Why am I, you know, sitting here at MITs typing data from Excel into a program that might be older than some of our youngest employees. >>Yeah. Now, now the way you described it, correct me if I'm wrong, the way you described it, it sounds like there's sort of a gating function though. You're not just putting these tools in the hands of people sitting, especially creatives who are there to create. You're not saying, Oh you want things automated, here are the tools. Go ahead. Automated. We'll we, for those of you who want to learn how to use the tools, we'll have you automate that there. Did I hear that right? You're, you're sort of making decisions about what things will be developed even by citizen developers. >>Let me, Do you wanna talk to them about governance? Yeah, absolutely. >>Yeah, so I think we started out with assistant development program, obviously the huge success, right? Last year we're also here at the Cubes. We're very happy to be back again. But I think a lot, a lot had changed and we've grown a lot since last year. One, I have the joy being a part of this team. And then the other thing is that we really expanded and implemented an automation operating model that I mentioned briefly just earlier. So what that enabled us to do is to unite developers from five continents together organically and we're now able to tap into their talent at a global scale. So we are really using this operating model to grow our automation practice in a scalable and also controlled manner. Okay. What I mean by that is that these developer originally were sitting in 18 plus markets, right? There's not much communication collaboration between them. >>And then we went in and bridged them together. What happened is that originally they were only delivering projects and use cases within their region and sometimes these use cases could be very, very much, you know, small scale and not really maximizing their talent. What we are now able to do is tap into a global automation pipeline. So we connecting these highly skilled people to the pipeline elsewhere, the use cases elsewhere that might not be within their regions because one of our focus, a lot of change I mentioned, right? One thing that will never change with our team, it's used automation to elevate people's potential. Now it's really a win-win situation cuz we are connecting the use cases from different pipelines. So the business is happy cuz we are delivering these high scalable solutions. We also utilizing these developers and they're happy because their skills are being maximized and then at the same time growing our automation program. So then that way the citizen development program so that the lower complexities projects are being delivered at a local level and we are able to innovate at a local level. >>I, I have so many questions flow based on what you just said. It's blowing my mind >>Here. It's a whole cycle. >>So let me start with how do you, you know, one of the, one of the concerns I had initially with RPA, cuz just you're talking about some very narrow use cases and your goal is to expand that to realize the potential of each individual, right? But early days I saw a lot of what I call paving the cow path, taking a process that was not a great process and then automating it, right? And that was limiting the potential. So how do you guys prioritize which processes to focus on and maybe which processes should be rethought, >>Right? Exactly. A lot of time when we do automation, right, we talk about innovations and all that stuff, but innovation doesn't happen with the same people sitting in the same room doing the same thing. So what we are doing now, able to connect all these people, different developers from different groups, we really bring the diversity together. That's diversity D diverse diversity in the mindset, diversity in the skill. So what are we really able to do and we see how we tackle this problem is to, and that's a problem for a lot of business out there is the short-termism. So there's something, what we do is that we take two approaches. One, before we, you know, for example, when we used to receive a use case, right? Maybe it's for the China market involving a specific tool and we just go right into development and start coding and all that good stuff, which is great. >>But what we do with this automation framework, which we think it's a really great service for any company out there that want to grow and mature their automation practice, it's to take a step back, think about, okay, so the China market would be beneficial from this automation. Can we also look at the Philippine market? Can we also look at the Thailand market? Because we also know that they have similar processes and similar auto tools that they use. So we are really able to make our automation in a more meaningful way by scaling a project just beyond one market. Now it's impacting the entire region and benefiting people in the entire region. That is what we say, you know, putting automation for good and then that's what we talked about at dsu, Teaming without limits. And that's a, so >>By taking, we wanna make sure that we're really like taking a step back, connecting all of the dots, building the one thing the right way, the first time. Exactly. And what's really integral into being able to have that transparency, that visibility is that now we're all working on the same platform. So you know, Brian spoke to you last year about our migration into automation cloud, having everything that single pipeline in the cloud. Anybody at DSU can often join the automation community and get access to automation hub, see what's out there, submit their own ideas, use the launchpad to go and take training. Yeah. And get started on their own automation journey as a citizen developer and you know, see the different paths that are available to them from that one central space. >>So by taking us a breath, stepping back, pausing just a bit, the business impact at the tail end is much, much higher. Now you start in 2017 really before you UI path made it's big enterprise play, it acquired process gold, you know, cloud elements now most recently referenced some others. How much of what you guys are, are, are doing is platform versus kind of the initial sort of robot installation? Yeah, >>I mean platforms power people and that's what we're here to do as the global automation team. Whether it's powering the citizen developers, the professional developers, anybody who's interacting with our automations at dsu, we wanna make sure that we're connecting the docs for them on a platform basis so that developers can develop and they don't need to develop those simple use cases that could be done by a citizen developer. You know, they're super smart technical people, they wanna do the cool shit with the new stuff. They wanna branch into, you know, using AI center and doing document understanding. That's, you know, the nature of human curiosity. Citizen developers, they're thrilled that we're making an investment to upscale them, to give them a new capability so that they can automate their own work. And they don't, they, they're the process experts. They don't need to spend a month talking to us when they could spend that time taking the training, learning how to create something themselves. >>How, how much sort of use case runway when you guys step back and look at your business, do you see a limit to the use cases? I mean where are you, if you had on a spectrum of, you know, maturity, how much more opportunity is there for DSU to automate? >>There's so much I think the, you feel >>Like it's limitless? >>No, I absolutely feel like it's limitless because there one thing, it's, there's the use cases and I think it's all about connecting the talent and making sure that something we do really, you know, making sure that we deliver these use cases, invest the time in our people so we make sure our professional developers part of our team spending 10 to 20% of the time to do learning and development because only limitless if our people are getting the latest and the greatest technology and we want to invest the time and we see this as an investment in the people making sure that we deliver the promise of putting people first. And the second thing, it's also investment in our company's growth. And that's a long term goal. And overcoming just focusing on things our short term. So that is something we really focus to do. And not only the use cases we are doing what we are doing as an operating model for automation. That is also something that we really value because then this is a kind of a playbook and a success model for many companies out there to grow their automation practice. So that's another angle that we are also focusing >>On. Well that, that's a relief because you guys are both seem really cool and, and I'm sitting here thinking they don't realize they're working themselves out of a job once they get everything automated, what are they gonna do? Right? But, but so, so it sounds like it's a never ending process, but because you guys are, are such a large global organization, it seems like you might have a luxury of being able to benchmark automations from one region and then benchmark them against other regions that aren't using that automation to be able to see very, very quickly not only realize ROI really quickly from the region where it's been implemented, but to be able to compare it to almost a control. Is that, is that part of your process? Yeah, >>Absolutely. Because we are such a global brand and with the automation, automation operating model, what we are able to do, not only focusing on the talent and the people, but also focusing on the infrastructure. So for example, right, maybe there's a first use case developing in Argentina and they have never done these automation before. And when they go to their security team and asking for an Okta bypass service account and the security team Argentina, like we never heard of automation, we don't know what UiPath is, why would I give you a service account for good reason, right? They're doing their job right. But what we able to do with automation model, it's to establish trust between the developers and the security team. So now we have a set up standing infrastructure that we are ready to go whenever an automation's ready to deploy and we're able to get the set up standing infrastructure because we have the governance to make sure the quality would delivered and making sure anything that we deployed, automation that we deploy are developed and governed by the best practice. So that's how we able to kind of get this automation expand globally in a very control and scalable manner because the people that we have build a relationship with. What are >>The governors to how fast you can adopt? Is it just expertise or bandwidth of that expertise or what's the bottleneck? >>Yeah, >>If >>You wanna talk more about, >>So in terms of the pipeline, we really wanna make sure that we are taking that step back and instead of just going, let's develop, develop, develop, here are the requirements like get started and go, we've prove the value of automation at Densu. We wanna make sure we are taking that step back and observing the pipeline. And it's, it's up to us to work with the business to really establish their priorities and the priorities. It's a, it's a big global organization. There might be different priorities in APAC than there are in EM for a good reason. APAC may not be adopted on the same, you know, e r P system for example. So they might have those smaller scale ROI use cases, but that's where we wanna work with them to identify, you know, maybe this is a legitimate need, the ROI is not there, let's upscale some citizen developers so that they can start, you know, working for themselves and get those results faster for those simpler use cases. >>Does, does the funding come from the line of business or IT or a combination? I mean there are obviously budget constraints are very concerned about the macro and the recession. You guys have some global brands, you know, as, as things ebb and flow in the economy, you're competing with other budgets. But where are the budgets coming from inside of dsu? Is it the business, is it the tech >>Group? Yeah, we really consider our automation group is the cause of doing business because we are here connecting people with bridging people together and really elevating. And the reason why we structure it that way, it's people, we do automation at dsu not to reduce head count, not to, you know, not, not just those matrix number that we measure, but really it's to giving time back to the people, giving time back to our business. So then that way they can focus on their wellbeing and that way they can focus on the work-life balance, right? So that's what we say. We are forced for good and by using automation for good as one really great example. So I think because of this agenda and because DSU do prioritize people, you know, so that's why we're getting the funding, we're getting the budget and we are seeing as a cause of doing business. So then we can get these time back using innovation to make people more fulfilling and applying automation in meaningful ways. >>Kate and Flo, congratulations. Your energy is palpable and really great success, wonderful story. Really appreciate you sharing. Thank you so >>Much for having us today. >>You're very welcome. All keep it right there. Dave Nicholson and Dave Ante. We're live from UI path forward at five from Las Vegas. We're in the Venetian Consent Convention Center. Will be right back, right for the short break.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by And Kate is the director You guys are huge company, but but give us the focus. we really respect the creatives of our company. What do you guys do? Well, I'm the director of engineering and automation, So making sure that we are managing our pipeline, sourcing the right ideas, up with rpa, but, but how did you guys get started? So we were absolutely inundated with all of these use cases So a lot of young people, Dave, they not not threatened by robots that racing it. Why am I, you know, sitting here at MITs typing data from Excel into to use the tools, we'll have you automate that there. Let me, Do you wanna talk to them about governance? So we are really using So we connecting these highly skilled people to I, I have so many questions flow based on what you just said. So how do you guys prioritize which processes to focus on and Maybe it's for the China market involving a specific tool and we just go right into So we are really able to So you know, of what you guys are, are, are doing is platform versus kind of the initial sort They wanna branch into, you know, using AI center and doing document understanding. And not only the use cases we are doing what On. Well that, that's a relief because you guys are both seem really cool and, and the security team Argentina, like we never heard of automation, we don't know what UiPath So in terms of the pipeline, we really wanna make sure that we are taking that step back You guys have some global brands, you know, as, as things ebb and flow in the So then we can get these time back using innovation to Thank you so We're in the Venetian Consent Convention Center.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kate | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Miami | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Larry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Argentina | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
95% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Flo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Kate Hall | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Excel | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Dave Ante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Flo Ye | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Larry Davids | PERSON | 0.99+ |
DSU | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kate Hall Slade | PERSON | 0.99+ |
18 plus markets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Super Bowl | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 hours a week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
APAC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two approaches | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Venetian Consent Convention Center | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
dentsu | PERSON | 0.98+ |
over 66,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
dsu | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Densu | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Super Bowls | EVENT | 0.98+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Cubes | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one market | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
MITs | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
five continents | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one region | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first use case | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Microsoft Factor | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
a hundred hours a month | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
single pipeline | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Philippine | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
each individual | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
One thing | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Dentsu | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
hundred plus countries | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
hundreds of thousands of hours | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
fourth forward | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
one central | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
UI Path | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
example | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
Gamble | ORGANIZATION | 0.69+ |
Fortune 100 companies | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
Domenic Ravita, SingleStore | AWS Summit New York 2022
(digital music) >> And we're back live in New York. It's theCUBE. It's not SNL, it's better than SNL. Lisa Martin and John Furrier here with about 10,000 to 12,000 folks. (John chuckles) There is a ton of energy here. There's a ton of interest in what's going on. But one of the things that we know that AWS is really well-known for is its massive ecosystem. And one of its ecosystem partners is joining us. Please welcome Domenic Ravita, the VP of Product Marketing from SingleStore. Dominic, great to have you on the program. >> Well, thank you. Glad to be here. >> It's a nice opening, wasn't it? (Lisa and John laughing) >> I love SNL. Who doesn't? >> Right? I know. So some big news came out today. >> Yes. >> Funding. Good number. Talk to us a little bit about that before we dig in to SingleStore and what you guys are doing with AWS. >> Right, yeah. Thank you. We announced this morning our latest round, 116 million. We're really grateful to our customers and our investors and the partners and employees and making SingleStore a success to go on this journey of, really, to fulfill our mission to unify and simplify modern, real time data. >> So talk to us about SingleStore. Give us the value prop, the key differentiators, 'cause obviously customers have choice. Help us understand where you're nailing it. >> SingleStore is all about, what we like to say, the moments that matter. When you have an analytical question about what's happening in the moment, SingleStore is your best way to solve that cost-effectively. So that is for, in the case of Thorn, where they're helping to protect and save children from online trafficking or in the case of True Digital, which early in the pandemic, was a company in Southeast Asia that used anonymized phone pings to identify real time population density changes and movements across Thailand to have a proactive response. So really real time data in the moment can help to save lives quite literally. But also it does things that are just good commercially that gives you an advantage like what we do with Uber to help real time pricing and things like this. >> It's interesting this data intensity happening right now. We were talking earlier on theCUBE with another guest and we said, "Why is it happening now?" The big data has been around since the dupe days. That was hard to work with, then data lakes kicked in. But we seem to be, in the past year, everyone's now aware like, "Wow, I got a lot of data." Is it the pandemic? Now we're seeing customers understand the consequences. So how do you look at that? Because is it just timing, evolution? Are they now getting it or is the technology better? Is machine learning better? What's the forces driving the massive data growth acceleration in terms of implementing and getting stuff out, done? (chuckles) >> We think it's the confluence of a lot of those things you mentioned there. First of all, we just celebrate the 15-year anniversary of the iPhone, so that is like wallpaper now. It's just faded into our daily lives. We don't even think of that as a separate thing. So there's an expectation that we all have instant information and not just for the consumer interactions, for the business interactions. That permeates everything. I think COVID with the pandemic forced everyone, every business to try to move to digital first and so that put pressure on the digital service economy to mature even faster and to be digital first. That is what drives what we call data intensity. And more generally, the economic phenomenon is the data intensive era. It's a continuous competition and game for customers. In every moment in every location, in every dimension, the more data hat you have, the better value prop you can give. And so SingleStore is uniquely positioned to and focused on solving this problem of data intensity by bringing and unifying data together. >> What's the big customer success story? Can you share any examples that highlight that? What are some cool things that are happening that can illustrate this new, I won't say bit that's been flipped, that's been happening for a while, but can you share some cutting edge customer successes? >> It's happening across a lot of industries. So I would say first in financial services, FinTech. FinTech is always at the leading edge of these kind of technology adaptions for speeds and things like that. So we have a customer named IEX Cloud and they're focused on providing real time financial data as an API. So it's a data product, API-first. They're providing a lot of historical information on instruments and that sort of thing, as well as real time trending information. So they have customers like Seeking Alpha, for instance, who are providing real time updates on massive, massive data sets. They looked at lots of different ways to do this and there's the traditional, transactionals, LTP database and then maybe if you want to scale an API like theirs, you might have a separate end-memory cache and then yet another database for analytics. And so we bring all that together and simplify that and the benefit of simplification, but it's also this unification and lower latency. Another example is GE who basically uses us to bring together lots of financial information to provide quicker close to the end-of-month process across many different systems. >> So we think about special purpose databases, you mentioned one of the customers having those. We were in the keynote this morning where AWS is like, "We have the broadest set of special purpose databases," but you're saying the industry can't afford them anymore. Why and would it make SingleStore unique in terms of what you deliver? >> It goes back to this data intensity, in that the new business models that are coming out now are all about giving you this instant context and that's all data-driven and it's digital and it's also analytical. And so the reason that's you can't afford to do this, otherwise, is data's getting so big. Moving that data gets expensive, 'cause in the cloud you pay for every byte you store, every byte you process, every byte you move. So data movement is a cost in dollars and cents. It's a cost in time. It's also a cost in skill sets. So when you have many different specialized data sets or data-based technologies, you need skilled people to manage those. So that's why we think the industry needs to be simplified and then that's why you're seeing this unification trend across the database industry and other parts of the stack happening. With AWS, I mean, they've been a great partner of ours for years since we launched our first cloud database product and their perspective is a little bit different. They're offering choice of the specialty, 'cause many people build this way. But if you're going after real time data, you need to bring it. They also offer a SingleStore as a service on AWS. We offer it that way. It's in the AWS Marketplace. So it's easily consumable that way. >> Access to real time data is no longer a nice-to-have for any company, it's table stakes. We saw that especially in the last 20 months or so with companies that needed to pivot so quickly. What is it about SingleStore that delivers, that you talked about moments that matter? Talk about the access to real time data. How that's a differentiator as well? >> I think businesses need to be where their customers are and in the moments their customers are interacting. So that is the real time business-driver. As far as technology wise, it's not easy to do this. And you think about what makes a database fast? A major way of what makes it fast is how you store the data. And so since 2014, when we first released this, what Gartner called at the time, hybrid transaction/analytical processing or HTAP, where we brought transactional data and analytical data together. Fast forward five years to 2019, we released this innovation called Universal Storage, which does that in a single unified table type. Why that matters is because, I would say, basically cost efficiency and better speed. Again, because you pay for the storage and you pay for the movement. If you're not duplicating that data, moving it across different stores, you're going to have a better experience. >> One of the things you guys pioneered is unifying workloads. You mentioned some of the things you've done. Others are now doing it. Snowflake, Google and others. What does that mean for you guys? I mean, 'cause are they copying you? Are they trying to meet the functionality? >> I think. >> I mean, unification. I mean, people want to just store things and make it, get all the table stakes, check boxes, compliance, security and just keep coding and keep building. >> We think it's actually great 'cause they're validating what we've been seeing in the market for years. And obviously, they see that it's needed by customers. And so we welcome them to the party in terms of bringing these unified workloads together. >> Is it easy or hard? >> It's a difficult thing. We started this in 2014. And we've now have lots of production workloads on this. So we know where all the production edge cases are and that capability is also a building block towards a broader, expansive set of capabilities that we've moved onto that next phase and tomorrow actually we have an event called, The Real Time Data Revolution, excuse me, where we're announcing what's in that new product of ours. >> Is that a physical event or virtual? >> It's a virtual event. >> So we'll get the URL on the show notes, or if you know, just go to the new site. >> Absolutely. SingleStore Real Time Data Revolution, you'll find it. >> Can you tease us with the top three takeaways from Revolution tomorrow? >> So like I said, what makes a database fast? It's the storage and we completed that functionality three years ago with Universal Storage. What we're now doing for this next phase of the evolution is making enterprise features available and Workspaces is one of the foundational capabilities there. What SingleStore Workspaces does is it allows you to have this isolation of compute between your different workloads. So that's often a concern to new users to SingleStore. How can I combine transactions and analytics together? That seems like something that might be not a good thing. Well, there are multiple ways we've been doing that with resource governance, workload management. Workspaces offers another management capability and it's also flexible in that you can scale those workloads independently, or if you have a multi-tenant application, you can segment your application, your customer tenant workloads by each workspace. Another capability we're releasing is called Wasm, which is W-A-S-M, Web Assembly. This is something that's really growing in the open source community and SingleStore's contributing to that open source scene, CF project with WASI and Wasm. Where it's been mentioned mostly in the last few years has been in the browser as a more efficient way to run code in the browser. We're adapting that technology to allow you to run any language of your choice in the database and why that's important, again, it's for data movement. As data gets large in petabyte sizes, you can't move it in and out of Pandas in Python. >> Great innovation. That's real valuable. >> So we call this Code Engine with Wasm and- >> What do you call it? >> Code Engine Powered by Wasm. >> Wow. Wow. And that's open source? >> We contribute to the Wasm open source community. >> But you guys have a service that you- >> Yes. It's our implementation and our database. But Wasm allows you to have code that's portable, so any sort of runtime, which is... At release- >> You move the code, not the data. >> Exactly. >> With the compute. (chuckles) >> That's right, bring the compute to the data is what we say. >> You mentioned a whole bunch of great customer examples, GE, Uber, Thorn, you talked about IEX Cloud. When you're in customer conversations, are you dealing mostly with customers that are looking to you to help replace an existing database that was struggling from a performance perspective? Or are you working with startups who are looking to build a product on SingleStore? Is it both? >> It is a mix of both. I would say among SaaS scale up companies, their API, for instance, is their product or their SaaS application is their product. So quite literally, we're the data engine and the database powering their scale to be able to sign that next big customer or to at least sleep at night to know that it's not going to crash if they sign that next big costumer. So in those cases, we're mainly replacing a lot of databases like MySQL, Postgre, where they're typically starting, but more and more we're finding, it's free to start with SingleStore. You can run it in production for free. And in our developer community, we see a lot of customers running in that way. We have a really interesting community member who has a Minecraft server analytics that he's building based on that SingleStore free tier. In the enterprise, it's different, because there are many incumbent databases there. So it typically is a case where there is a, maybe a new product offering, they're maybe delivering a FinTech API or a new SaaS digital offering, again, to better participate in this digital service economy and they're looking for a better price performance for that real time experience in the app. That's typically the starting point, but there are replacements of traditional incumbent databases as well. >> How has the customer conversation evolved the last couple of years? As we talked about, one of the things we learned in the pandemic was access to real time data and those moments that matter isn't a nice-to-have anymore for businesses. There was that force march to digital. We saw the survivors, we're seeing the thrivers, but want to get your perspective on that. From the customers, how has the conversation evolved or elevated, escalated within an organization as every company has to be a data company? >> It really depends on their business strategy, how they are adapting or how they have adapted to this new digital first orientation and what does that mean for them in the direct interaction with their customers and partners. Often, what it means is they realize that they need to take advantage of using more data in the customer and partner interaction and when they come to those new ideas for new product introductions, they find that it's complicated and expensive to build in the old way. And if you're going to have these real time interactions, interactive applications, APIs, with all this context, you're going to have to find a better, more cost-effective approach to get that to market faster, but also not to have a big sprawling data-based technology infrastructure. We find that in those situations, we're replacing four or five different database technologies. A specialized database for key value, a specialized database for search- >> Because there's no unification before? Is that one of the reasons? >> I think it's an awareness thing. I think technology awareness takes a little bit of time, that there's a new way to do things. I think the old saying about, "Don't pave cow paths when the car..." You could build a straight road and pave it. You don't have to pave along the cow path. I think that's the natural course of technology adaption and so as more- >> And the- pandemic, too, highlighted a lot of the things, like, "Do we really need that?" (chuckles) "Who's going to service that?" >> That's right. >> So it's an awakening moment there where it's like, "Hey, let's look at what's working." >> That's right. >> Double down on it. >> Absolutely. >> What are you excited about new round of funding? We talked about, obviously, probably investments in key growth areas, but what excites you about being part of SingleStore and being a partner of AWS? >> SingleStore is super exciting. I've been in this industry a long time as an engineer and an engineering leader. At the time, we were MemSQL, came into SingleStore. And just that unification and simplification, the systems that I had built as a system engineer and helped architect did the job. They could get the speed and scale you needed to do track and trace kinds of use cases in real time, but it was a big trade off you had to make in terms of the complexity, the skill sets you needed and the cost and just hard to maintain. What excites me most about SingleStore is that it really feels like the iPhone moment for databases because it's not something you asked for, but once your friend has it and shows it to you, why would you have three different devices in your pocket with a flip phone, a calculator? (Lisa and Domenic chuckles) Remember these days? >> Yes. >> And a Blackberry pager. (all chuckling) You just suddenly- >> Or a computer. That's in there. >> That's right. So you just suddenly started using iPhone and that is sort of the moment. It feels like we're at it in the database market where there's a growing awareness and those announcements you mentioned show that others are seeing the same. >> And your point earlier about the iPhone throwing off a lot of data. So now you have data explosions at levels that unprecedented, we've never seen before and the fact that you want to have that iPhone moment, too, as a database. >> Absolutely. >> Great stuff. >> The other part of your question, what excites us about AWS. AWS has been a great partner since the beginning. I mean, when we first released our database, it was the cloud database. It was on AWS by customer demand. That's where our customers were. That's where they were building other applications. And now we have integrations with other native services like AWS Glue and we're in the Marketplace. We've expanded, that said we are a multi-cloud system. We are available in any cloud of your choice and on premise and in hybrid. So we're multi-cloud, hybrid and SaaS distribution. >> Got it. All right. >> Got it. So the event is tomorrow, Revolution. Where can folks go to register? What time does it start? >> 1:00 PM Eastern and- >> 1:00 PM. Eastern. >> Just Google SingleStore Real Time Data Revolution and you'll find it. Love for everyone to join us. >> All right. We look forward to it. Domenic, thank you so much for joining us, talking about SingleStore, the value prop, the differentiators, the validation that's happening in the market and what you guys are doing with AWS. We appreciate it. >> Thanks so much for having me. >> Our pleasure. For Domenic Ravita and John Furrier, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE, live from New York at AWS Summit 22. John and I are going to be back after a short break, so come back. (digital pulsing music)
SUMMARY :
Dominic, great to have you Glad to be here. I love SNL. So some big news came out today. and what you guys are doing with AWS. and our investors and the So talk to us about SingleStore. So that is for, in the case of Thorn, is the technology better? the better value prop you can give. and the benefit of simplification, in terms of what you deliver? 'cause in the cloud you pay Talk about the access to real time data. and in the moments their One of the things you guys pioneered get all the table stakes, check in the market for years. and that capability is or if you know, just go to the new site. SingleStore Real Time Data in that you can scale That's real valuable. We contribute to the Wasm open source But Wasm allows you to You move the code, With the compute. That's right, bring the compute that are looking to you to help and the database powering their scale We saw the survivors, in the direct interaction with You don't have to pave along the cow path. So it's an awakening moment there and the cost and just hard to maintain. And a Blackberry pager. That's in there. and that is sort of the moment. and the fact that you want to have in the Marketplace. All right. So the event 1:00 PM. Love for everyone to join us. in the market and what you John and I are going to be
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Domenic | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Domenic Ravita | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dominic | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Southeast Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
1:00 PM | DATE | 0.99+ |
116 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
MySQL | TITLE | 0.99+ |
True Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Blackberry | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SNL | TITLE | 0.98+ |
SingleStore | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
SingleStore | TITLE | 0.97+ |
1:00 PM Eastern | DATE | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Thorn | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
each workspace | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Minecraft | TITLE | 0.96+ |
12,000 folks | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Python | TITLE | 0.96+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
W-A-S-M | TITLE | 0.95+ |
past year | DATE | 0.95+ |
about 10,000 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Wasm | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
FinTech | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
first cloud database | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
AWS Summit | EVENT | 0.91+ |
five different database | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.9+ |
three different devices | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
first orientation | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Joanne Kua, KSK, Krystine Kua, KSK City LabsCindy Kua, Sunday Insur | Women in Tech: Int Women's Day
>>Yeah. Hello. Welcome to the Cubes International Women's Showcase, featuring International Women's Day. I'm John for your host of the queue here in Palo Alto, California. And we have three great guests videoing in from Kuala Lumpur as well as Bangkok. Johann Kwa, group CEO of K s K Group. It's just a Christina Equal, co founder and head of K s, K C Labs and Cindy, co founder of Sunday Insurance in Bangkok. Ladies. Thanks for coming on the cue. Appreciate you coming on. Thanks for Thanks for joining me on this special day. >>Thank you. Thank you so much. You >>guys are three sisters, trailblazing and the insurance and real estate through digital transformation in the cloud taking a three decade old family business to the next level raising the bar, as they say in the cloud business. Congratulations. Tell us how it all started. What's going on now? What does it look like? Where did it come from? Tell the Storey. >>Okay, so maybe I'll start, Uh, you know, since I'm at the group CEO level. So, um, as a quick introduction, you know? Okay. SK group, uh, were about 30 years old now, as a group three decades. Um, we started off as an insurance, uh, nonlife insurance company. Um, and then over the years, um, you know, we we operate in in South East Asia, So we are based in the US and markets. That message is also sitting in, um, and very quickly over the years, you know, we decided to actually venture into property development as well. Um, and really across the journey. Um, you know, we we've always been very, um, obsessed over the customers. You know, uh, and, you know, during this time and age, you know, all the customers are really digital natives now, and and, you know, the tech is very, very interesting. And so So starting in the year of 2017, we decided, um, to actually venture. Cindy and I at least we decided to start up our own, uh, tech, uh, called Sunday. Uh, Cindy is now the full time CEO and co founders. Um, and, you know, uh, it's an exciting journey from then on, uh, where now The first full stack ensure attack in in the whole of of the Asian market, uh, starting off in Thailand. Um, And then when Christine came back, to join the business. You know, since we were already in real estate, we decided, taking on from the inspiration of what we did with Sunday, how about we do the same in in in property? Because we obviously saw, you know, there was super loads of opportunities that we could we could we could do. And and a year ago, we gave birth to cast a city lapse. Um, now a prop tech company based in Malaysia. >>Christine and Cindy tell the storey here because this is actually fascinating. Storey, your sisters, your entrepreneurial. So you know each other? You're related and you've got ups and downs with the startups and growing companies changing landscape. A lot of challenges. You all gotta get along all the time. How's it going? What's it like? Mm. >>Maybe I'll start. I think I think for me I'm probably the newest addition to the trio in the, you know, working together kind of space. So for me, I think it's all about really learning how to, you know, separate your professional and personal life. And like you mentioned, you know, we live together. But we also work together. So for me, I think I took a >>lot of advice >>and direction. Um, both from Johann and, >>uh, help >>me a lot. Um, so So I think that's been my experience. Been great So far, Um, they've been really, really supportive. And I think going through this journey of, you know, like, founding a company together, it's obviously very challenging. And so I feel very fortunate to have two sisters who have already gone through it once, you know? >>So for the other guests is trying to get on the cube here. Over there. Um, sounds like fun. Uh, Christine. So on the city labs, you gotta cheque side of it there in the in the property tech. That's exciting. How's it going over there? >>Uh, super, Super cool. Super fun. Uh, has been one heck of a journey building a company from scratch, let alone in tech. I think you know, we created K s K C d lives because we really wanted to modernise the real estate industry, uh, and create, like, super transformative solutions, uh, many for two reasons. You know, one is to improve the quality of life, um, of the community around us. Uh, and secondly, really to harness all the technology and this unused data right in the real estate industry. And try and say, how can we use that to make more intelligent business decisions? Yeah, so So really, Um, I guess for us, it's been really exciting because we've launched two products. Uh, you know, one of which is Ai driven, dynamic pricing engine. And we realised that actually, the way that homes are priced today, uh, in real estate is super RK right? You only use a few basic variables. Like, how big is your house? What views do you have? But then we realised that, actually hey, with a I where you suddenly can use, like, hundreds of variables, um, and even, you know, consisting of wellness variables, for example. Um, and you can really customise pricing all the way down to a single unit level. Uh, and we realise that by doing this, we could actually unlock, um, ferret prices for our customers while also constantly kind of tracking the financial health of the company. >>Awesome. Cindy, I wanna get you in here. A co founder, Sunday Insurance. That was the origination. But a lot of change data drives everything machine learning. You gotta have the state of the art. What's going on with you? >>Yeah, I think for us, essentially, uh, we're operating in a very old industry. Um, it's one of the oldest industries globally. And if you look at the entire insurance value chain, um, every part of the process can actually, it's all about data. You can. It can be disrupted. Um, but yet every inch of the value chain is also regulated. So I think essentially what we're trying to do is, um, we're trying to really innovate the customer journey. So imagine if, um, even in the States now and even coming back to Asia, a lot of how people buy insurance is still very face to face agency. But I think in the future is going to be remote online on your app, through any partners as well. So I think, uh, we're trying to adopt any machine learning to really scale and automate, uh, the journey of anyone who's trying to buy insurance. But at the same time for insurance companies were also trying to help them automate that function itself. So imagine if banks are trying to dish out loans and you're trying to predict. What's the credit risk of every, um, single customer? That's exactly what insurance company needs to do as well. Um, And I guess insurance is all about buying a service as well. >>It's unlike you >>know, I'm gonna buy an apple. It comes to the hardware, >>right? So we're >>selling a service. So essentially you're service has to also dramatically changed. And I think these days, especially when we're operating in, uh, Thailand, Indonesia is one of the highest adoption rates for mobile these days. Everyone does. Everything lives on on the apps. So, um, insurance companies also needs to really on board their journey on that as well as increased engagement. So I don't just want to be an insurance company where, um, I speak to you and I have an issue with my claim. I want to really build a relationship with you and engage you differently. So I think it's actually that's the mission for a Sunday. So I think Imagine if imagine an insurance company 50 years in the future. How would it be? Uh, that's our mission. >>This is a great example. You guys, First of all, you're very dynamic. Thanks for sharing your storey. But when you get into the tech here, if industries that are transforming because of the digital transformation, the consumers expect the apps. You guys, as co founders and entrepreneurs now running this big business have to meet the demands and leverage the technology. How have you done that? How are you guys manage that? What kinds of decisions have you made? And you share some either experiences or observations of how to navigate and how you're riding that wave. >>Yeah. So I think if you hear from what Cindy and Christine has just mentioned, I mean, uh, we were playing in, you know, two of the oldest and largest industries in the world. Real estate and insurance. And, uh, you know, in both industries, as I said earlier, you know, it's really all about the customers, right? Um you know, in in the past, we used to think of of businesses as you know, what's your vertical and the horizontal today? Um, at least four k s k and and and all the all these, um, you know, tech ventures that we are now venture building. We're really thinking about it from the customer land. So really thinking about it from a customer ecosystem perspective. So instead of, you know, creating products and and having that push out to the customers, you know, we use tech and data and and especially data today and the right amount of data and what type of data that we want understanding that and really, um, building that product and really the services, uh, for the customers. So once you know the customer enters our ecosystem, whether you know, in your real estate, um, ecosystem or whether it's in your insurance ecosystem, we want you to to continue to stay with us, um, and to trust us. Um, and so it's not just about selling you a product, but really, you know, like, what Cindy says building a relationship with you because we think that, you know, obviously you know when insurance is something you really need when when when things go wrong in your life, we don't only want to be there. When things go wrong in your life and for real estate, you know everybody needs a shelter. So so so that's why we think that building relationships are very important and from really true, that lands is when you really think about the ecosystem and you think about data. I think Cindy Increasing gave some examples of how we're approaching it. Um, a lot of people start from from from a, you know, from a traditional business and from within. But for us, um, we decided to actually take it outside. Um, and, you know, take the approach of venture building from a startup, um, but really have, on the back end, really have that Connexion to the core businesses. Because what the core businesses understand is, you know, lifetime and experience of how customers feel and and, you know, um, in insurance, it's really about how to run a financial institution in real estate is really how to build buildings, and that is something that we can't take away. But, you know, you use technology to enable and to power. But what venture and start ups do extremely well is really the way we are extremely nimble and the way you use tech and data to navigate the quick changes of customer demands. And and you know, one thing an app and it's all about quick iterations. Right? When you build a super app, how do you incorporate all the features that are coming in, you have to keep on, you know, iterating changing, innovating, um, and innovating small with quick wins and then taking on a larger scale. And so the way we position ourselves is when you have to start up and you combine that with the core. Um, and putting the two together is how, how, how we look at things and that four minutes, the whole ecosystem >>that's awesome and being agile as fast and speed is key if you want to be there. Startup. But at the core business, that's going kind of slow. You got to kind of make everything go faster. That's a great, great insight. Let's talk about the disruption of the property industry again. That's real estate now with the Internet of things, technologies and also people expect technology. They wanna have access. I don't wanna have all these passwords and, you know they want to have easy in and out. They want good efficiency, save money. What's the disruption angle on? Um, the property neck. Christine, what's your How do you see that? The big disruption going? >>Yeah. So I think as Johann already mentioned before, you know um I think our customers we know are becoming, um, digital natives. Right? And they expect very convenient lifestyles. And we're all about our customers. So, actually, that's why we launched also another product, right where we're taking all of these things that you just mentioned, you know, about Iot into account. So what we found is, um, that actually, today, um, you know, the village about real estate is that we all live through that life as well, so we can experience that. Uh, we found that residents today, um, they find it quite challenging to request, you know, basic services like housekeeping managing, um, their defects, their tenants. Um, you know, even the financial planning and even getting into the building, right, they want more convenience. Um, but we realised that actually, all these services in the real estate industry right now and even in the prop tech space, they are very, very segmented. They're all discussed across multiple different apps. So what we really try to do is hey, let's try and consolidate all of this into one single app, which we have done, which is really cool, And it helps our residents really stay engaged and connected with our property. Um, what we did also was on the Iot front. We we were actually the first developer in Malaysia to also integrate, You know, future proof solutions like remote lift calling as well, um, into the mobile app. And that's to really go like, push on the Iot front. For us as well. >>Must be great for retention. It's all the gadgets are built into the of course. You have good WiFi fibre in their everyone's got good band with >>for sure >>It's like water and plumbing. Uh, I'd like to get everyone everyone loves that. I gotta ask Now, on the on the on the on The disruption is great. Now you've got the clouds, the clouds here for actually Amazon. You guys are big customer because you guys can move fast and they do all the heavy lifting. How are you guys seeing that helped modernise in the industry of insurance? Because that's a big vertical for a W s and you guys are doing is Cindy. What is the What is the modernisation? Um, half that you guys have taken with a W s. >>Yeah, sure. So I think essentially, for insurance, it's a product development. And when we talk about product development means, um how do you price, um, every certain individual or company very differently, right, Because everyone has very different risks surrounding them. Uh, currently, what we face is that it's a flat pricing fixed pricing. Um, and it's not really personalised to you. If you are a very good behaviour and safe kind of customer, it doesn't translate to any premium savings for you. Um, so I think, uh, part of insurance is to give, for example, affordable access to health care. But if your premiums isn't sustainable for health insurance, then it doesn't really need the point. So, uh, for Sunday, like, how we're trying to trying to do it differently is, for example, we use some AWS cloud solutions and AWS Lambda too, really power our machine learning Savalas and Cloud infrastructure. So, for example, uh, Sunday we are a serious bee companies sober and the growth stage. So at any point in time, we need to ensure that our infrastructure is able to support a huge spike in transaction volume, and we're working with large scale partners like telcos, e commerce companies, or even within our organic channels. So our AI machine learning risk prediction model, which is basically, um, powering our premium pricing engines whenever there's any requests coming in front of the Web for foreign quotation. For example, if someone wants to buy health insurance, um, it can go up and spike. But also, the data model is actually pricing, uh, processing billions of calculations, ingesting a lot of data points. Uh, it needs to do that within seconds, so yeah, I think a w s. We've been using it from day one since we launched. It's been, uh, helping us on >>that and make it go faster. That's the big thing. I gotta ask you when you guys have this family business now, three decades, you got a lot going on extending that legacy and sustaining the family legacy. I love the Storey. So who decides whether to do the startup and you guys draw straws? Is that you guys flip a coin? You gotta who runs the big business? How do you guys decide that? Mm. >>Um, maybe I'll >>I >>would say maybe it came very naturally to us. Really? I guess Here we don't have to disclose. Our age is a little bit, so I mean, I mean, we all actually the background and really all three of us. Before we came into the family business, we were all working professionals in very different fields. I was a I was in banking. Cindy was a lawyer, and Christine was a a doctor, actually, Um um, but, you know, I came back first. I'm the eldest, so after, you know, walking outside and looking into the family business. So I came back first, and and And from there, I took over the insurance business and looking at it, it was a very lonely place to be. So, um, you know, after a couple of years of Cindy being a professional life, you know, we said, Hey, would you like to come back? And let's, uh, take a different journey with insurance and see how we can build something different? Uh, since we know a lot about insurance, but let's make make make a difference and and and, you know, be sustainable, but also evolve over time and show the world that insurance is actually pretty sexy, actually. Um, and then, you know, Christine saw the fund that the two of us were having, uh, already started building a real estate on on my end. Uh, and then, uh, she came back. And, you know, we have a conversation, and we said, Look, looking at you know what we're doing in Sunday? You know, building pricing engines and being able to price to a single customer level. Um, we saw that opportunity in real estate, and, uh so I asked her. I said, Look, would you like to do this? You know, because I think there is something cool. Um, the three of us can band together and still inspire each other share ideas across each other. That's an opportunity that a lot of people don't get right. I mean, to all these industries in the world being able to cross share ideas. Uh, and sometimes inspirations and ideas don't come from the same industry. Uh, and so I think. And that's how we started. Really, John, it's not. Maybe we're lucky, and we should be grateful for >>that. You're all power women. I love the storey, and it is good that you come together, and I think the entrepreneurial kind of twist makes it more fun. But not everyone is cut out with the entrepreneurship, but it also gives you more risk management. You can. You can go after opportunities I love. I love the strategy there. You guys are great leaders. Any advice for other aspiring women leaders and entrepreneurs out there who want to make a difference? Make an impact? The world is. Change is getting better for everyone. And and again, entrepreneurial could be in big companies and also big companies doing startups. There's a whole new world. What advice would you guys give other aspiring women leaders? Okay, >>I'll keep it short from my end. I think for me it's about really following your passion following your ambition. And lastly, I think not to try and not feel like you need to conform to any gender stereotypes because I think in male dominated industries such as real estate, our are attack. I think people might have some ideas about you know what a what a tech leader or what a real estate leader might have to look like. But you don't have to conform to that. So that's probably my advice. Uh, >>yeah, I I fully agree with Chris right there. I think, um, gender isn't an issue here. If you have a passion and you identify, there is a market opportunity that you can, you know, you can really do something about it. Just just pursue it. I think most importantly, if you ever want to be an entrepreneur and start your own business or your own, start up. Uh, so long as you have the confidence, I think you're you're good to go. Um, there's a lot of talk out that that or, you know, um, women led start ups are not >>attracting >>funds, but we haven't faced that anyway. In this part of Asia, I think there's a lot of, um, I think it attracts even more attention. If you're a woman in a male dominated that industry like, hey, then you know it's it's quite unique. So I think you have a strength there, and I think there's a lot of diverse talent out there. Um, post pandemic. A lot of people are looking for changes as well, so I think it is a lot of a lot of opportunity out there. >>Yeah, Joanne, you know, you know, the thing is with cloud computing, it's a level centre. It really because if you can come together, whether it's sisters like you guys, powerful sisters and professional experience coming together leverage technology to re factor old industries. It's all about the numbers and the performance. At the end of the day, you know, you move faster and you take territory and beat the competition. >>Ultimate >>the ultimate uh, leveller. Well, congratulations. You guys are great. Thanks for coming on The Cube Sisters. You guys are amazing. Great Storey Love it. Thanks for coming out and celebrating International Women's Day feature today as part of our international women's showcase here in the Cube. Thank you so much. >>Thank you. Thank you for having us. >>Okay. The Cubes International Women's showcase Going on all year, this time featuring International Women's Day The big celebration. I'm John Ferrier, host of the Cube here in Palo Alto, California. Thanks for watching. Mm mm
SUMMARY :
Appreciate you coming on. Thank you so much. Tell the Storey. Um, and then over the years, um, you know, we we operate in in South So you know each other? learning how to, you know, separate your professional and personal life. Um, both from Johann and, And I think going through this journey of, you know, So on the city labs, you gotta cheque side I think you know, You gotta have the state of the art. And if you look at the entire insurance value chain, um, every part of the process can actually, It comes to the hardware, So I don't just want to be an insurance company where, um, I speak to you and I have an issue with my But when you get into the tech in in the past, we used to think of of businesses as you know, what's your vertical and the horizontal today? I don't wanna have all these passwords and, you know they want to have easy Um, you know, even the financial planning and even getting into the building, It's all the gadgets are built into the of course. Um, half that you guys have taken with a W And when we talk about product development means, um how do you price, I gotta ask you when you guys have this family business Um, and then, you know, Christine saw the fund that the two of us were having, I love the storey, and it is good that you come together, and I think the entrepreneurial And lastly, I think not to try and not feel like you need to conform to Um, there's a lot of talk out that that or, you know, um, women led start ups are not So I think you have a strength At the end of the day, you know, you move faster and you take territory and beat the competition. Thank you so much. Thank you for having us. I'm John Ferrier, host of the Cube here
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Cindy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Christine | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Christina Equal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Ferrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joanne Kua | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Malaysia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Krystine Kua | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Johann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
K s | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kuala Lumpur | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Joanne | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Johann Kwa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
South East Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
K C Labs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
K s K Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Bangkok | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
50 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
International Women's Day | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Sunday | DATE | 0.99+ |
two sisters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two products | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Indonesia | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
two reasons | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three sisters | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cindy Increasing | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Sunday Insurance | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one single app | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first developer | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three decades | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
three great guests | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
both industries | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
hundreds of variables | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Storey | PERSON | 0.93+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.92+ |
about 30 years old | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
KSK | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Cubes | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Sudheesh Nair, ThoughtSpot | CUBE Conversation
>>mhm >>Hello welcome to this cube conversation here in Palo alto California and john for with the cube we had a great conversation around the rise of the cloud and the massive opportunities and challenges around analytics data ai suggestion. Air ceo of thought spot is here with me for conversation. Great to see you. Welcome back to the cube. How are you? >>Well john it is so good to be back. I wish that we could do one of those massive set up that you have and do this face to face but zoom is not bad. >>You guys are doing very well. We have been covering you guys been covering the progress um great technology enabled business. You're on the wave of this cloud analytics you're seeing, we've seen massive changes and structural changes for the better. It's a tailwind for anyone in the cloud data business. And you also on the backdrop of all that the Covid and now the covid is looking at coming out of covid with growth strategies. People are building modern or modernizing their infrastructure and data is not just a department, it's everywhere. You guys are in the middle of this. Take us through what's the update on thought spot. What are you guys doing? What do you see the market right now? Honestly, delta variants coming coming strong but we think will be out of this soon. Where where are >>we look I think it all starts with the users like you said the consumers are demanding more and more from the business they are interacting with. You're no longer happy with being served like uh I'm gonna put you all in a bucket and then Delaware services to you. Everyone's like look look at me, I have likes and dislikes that is probably going to be different from someone that you think are similar to me. So unless you get to know me and deliver bespoke services to me, I'm gonna go somewhere else who does that And the call that the way you do that is through the data that I'm giving to you. So the worst thing you can do is to take my data and still treat me like an average and numbers and what's happening with the cloud is that it is now possible and it wasn't okay. So I grew up in India where newspapers will always have stock market summary on like one full page full of takers and prices and the way it used to work is that you wake up in the morning you look at the newspaper, I don't know if you have had the same thing and then you call your broker is based on in place of that. Can you imagine doing that now? I mean the information is at your fingertips. Hurricane IDa either is actually going to enter in Louisiana somewhere. What good is it? Yesterday morning state on this morning state if I'm trying to make a decision on whether I should pack my stuff and move away or you know finding to from home depot supply chain manager. I shouldn't figure out what should I be doing for Louisiana in the next two days, this is all about the information that's available to you. If you plan to use it and deliver better services for your consumer cloud makes it possible. >>You know, it's interesting you mentioned that the old way things were it seems so slow, then you got the 15 minute quotes, then there's now a real time. Everything has to be real time. And clearly there's two major things happening at the same time which makes exciting the business model and the competitive advantages for leaders and business to use data is critical but also on the developer side where apps are being developed if you don't have the data access, the machine learning won't work well. So as machine learning becomes really courted driving ai this modern analytics cloud product that you guys announced brings to bear kind of two major lifts the developer app modernization as well as competitive advantage for the companies that need to deploy this. So you guys have announced this modern approach analytics cloud, so to speak. What are some of the challenges that companies are having? Because you gotta, if you hit both of those you're gonna right a lot of value. What are some of the challenges for people who want to do this modern cloud? >>I think the challenge is basically all inside in the company. If you ask companies why are they failing to modernize? They will point to what's inside, it's not outside the technology is there the stack is the vendors are there, It is sometimes lack of courage at the leadership level which is a huge problem. I'll give an example. Uh, we have recently announced what we call thoughts part everywhere, which is our way of looking at how to modernize and bring the data inside that you're looking forward to where you are because Lord knows we all have enough apps on our Octa or a single sign on. The last thing you need is one more how no matter how good it is, they don't want to log into yet under their tool, whether it's thought spot or not. But the insights that you are talking about needs to be there when you need. And the difference is uh, the fundamental approach of data analytics was built on embedded model. You know what we are proposing is what we call data apps. So the difference between data apps and the typical dashboard being embedded into your analytics model is sort of like think of it. Uh newspapers telephones and the gap in between. So there is newspapers radio that is walkie talkie and telephone. They're all different and newspapers get printed and it comes to you and you read in the morning, you can talk back to it, you can drag and drop, you can change it right walkie talkies on the other hand, you know, you could have one conversation then come back to that. Whereas phone, you can have true direction conversation? They're all different if you think of embedding it is sort of like the newspaper, the information that you can't talk back. So somebody resembling something that came out monday, you're going to a board meeting on Wednesday and you look at that and make decisions. That is not enough in the new world, you just can't do that. It's not about what a lot of tools can actually answer what the real magic the real value for customers are unlocked when you ask three subsequent questions and answer them and they will come down to when you hear what you have to know. So what? Right and then what if and then the last is what next Imagine you can answer those three questions every business person every time no matter how powerful the dashboard is, they will always have the next question. What? So what? Okay the business customers are turning so what is it good, is it bad? Is it normal or the next question is like now what what do I do with it two, the ability to take all these three questions so what and what a fun. Now what? That requires true interactivity, you know, start with an intent and with an action and that is what we are actually proposing with the data apps which is only possible if you're sitting on top of a snowflake or red shift kind of really powerful and massive cloud data warehouse where the data comes and moves with agility. >>So how has this cloud data model rewritten the rules of business? Because what you're bringing up is essentially now full interactivity really getting in, getting questions that are iterating and building on context to each other. But with all this massive cloud data, people are really excited by this. How is it changing business than the rules of business? >>Yeah. So think about, I mean topical things like there is a hurricane able to enter, hit the cost of the United States. It's a moving target. No one knows exactly where it is going to be. There is only 15 models from here. 10, 10 models from Europe that's going to predict which way it's going to take every millimeter change in that map is going to have significant consequences for lives and resources and money. Right. This is true for every business. What cloud does this? Uh you have your proprietary data for example, let's say you're a bank and you have proprietary data, you're launching a new product And the propriety data was 2025 extremely valuable. But what what's not proprietary but what is available to you? Which could make that data so much more relevant if you layer them on top census data, this was a census here. The census data is updated. Do you not want that vaccination leader? We clearly know that purchasing power parity will vary based on vaccinations and county by county. But is that enough? You need to have street by street is county data enough. If you're going to open startup, Mr Starbucks? No, you probably want to know much more granular data. You wanna know traffic. Is the traffic picking up business usually an office space where people are not coming to office or is it more of a shopping mall where people are still showing all of these data is out there for you? What cloud is making it possible? Unlike the old era where you know, your data is an SFP oracle or carry later in your data center, it's available for you with a matter of clicks. What thought sport modern analytics. Cloud is a simple thing. We are the front end to bring all of this data and make sense of it. You can sit on top of any cloud data and then interact with a complete sort of freedom without compromising on security, compliance or relevance. And what happens is the analysts, the people who are responsible for bringing the data and then making sure that it is secure and delivered. They are no longer doing incremental in chart updates and dashboard updates. What they're doing is solving business problems, business people there freely interacting and making bigger decisions. That actually adds value to their consumers. This is what your customers are looking for, your users are looking for and if you're not doing it, your competitor will do that. So this is why cloud is not a choice for you. It's not an option for you. It is the only way and if you fail to take that back the other way is taking the world out of a cliff. >>Yeah, that's I love it. But I want to get this uh topic of thoughts about anywhere, but I want to just close out on this whole idea of modern cloud scale analytics. What technology under the hood do you guys see that customers should pay attention to with thought spot and in general because the scale there. So is it just machine learning? We hear data lakes, you know, you know different configurations of that. Machine learning is always thrown around like a buzzword. What new technology capability should every executive by your customer look for when it comes to really doing analytics, modern in the cloud >>analytics has to be near real time, Which means what two things speed at scale, make sure it's complex, it can deal with complexity in data structure. Data complexity is a huge problem. Now imagine doing that at scale and then delivering with performance. That means you have to rethink Look Tableau grew out of excellent worksheets that is the market leader, it is a $40 billion dollar market with the largest company having only a billion dollars in revenue. This is a massive place where the problems need to be solved differently. So the underlying technology to me are like I said, these three things, number one cannot handle the cloud scale, you will have hundreds of billions of rows of data that you brought. But when you talk about social media sentiment of customers, analysis of traffic and weather patterns, all of these publicly available valuable data. We're talking trillions of rows of data. So that is scale. Now imagine complexity. So financial sector for example, there is health care where you know some data is visible, some data is not visible, some some is public assumption not or you have to take credit data and let it on top of your marketing data. So it becomes more complex. And the last is when you answer ask a question, can you deliver with absolute confidence that you're giving the right answer With extremely high performance and to do that you have to rebuild the entire staff. You cannot take your, you know, stack that was built in 1990s and so now we can do search So search that is built for these three things with the machine learning and ai essentially helping at every step of the way so that you're not throwing all this inside directly to a human, throw it to a i engine and the ai engine curates what is relevant to you, showing it to you. And then based on your interaction with that inside, I improve my own logic so that the next interaction, the next situation is going to be significantly better. My point is you cannot take a triple a map and then try to act like this google maps. One is built presuming and zoom out and learn from you. The other one is built to give you rich information but doesn't talk back. So the staff has to be fundamentally rebuilt for the club. That's what he's doing. >>I love I love to buy direction. I love the interactivity. This topic of thought spot everywhere, which you mentioned at the beginning of this conversation, you mentioned data apps which by the way I love that concept. I want to do a drill down on that. Uh I saw data marketplace is coming somewhat working but I think it's going to get it better. I love that idea of an app um, and using as developers but you also mentioned embedded analytics. You made a comment about that. So I gotta ask you what's the difference between data apps and embedded analytics? >>Embedded analytics means that uh you know the dashboards that you love but the one that doesn't talk back to you is going to be available inside the app that you built for your other So if a supply chain app that was built by let's say accenture inside that you haven't had your dashboard without logging into tablet. Great. But what you do, what's the big deal? It is the same thing. My point is like I said every time a business user sees a chart. The questions are going to come up. The next 10 question is where the values on earth for example on Yelp imagine if you will piece about I'm hungry. I want to find a restaurant and it says go to this burrito place. It doesn't work like that. It's not good enough. The reason why yell towards is because I start with an intent. I'm hungry. Okay show me all restaurants. Okay I haven't had about it for a while. Let me see the photos. Let me read the reviews. Let me see if my friends have eaten, let me see some menu. Can I walk there? I do all of this but just what underneath it. There is a rich set of data that probably helped have their own secret source and reviews and then you have google map powering some of them. But I don't care all of that is coming together to deliver a seamless experience that satisfies my hunger. Which will be very different from if you use the same map at the same place you might go to an italian place. I go to bed right. That is the power of a data app in business people are still sitting with this. I am hungry. I gotta eat burrito. That's not how it should be in the new world. A business user should have the freedom to add exactly what the customers require looking for and solve that problem without delay. That means every application should be power and enriched with the data where you can interact and customized. That is not something that enterprise customers are actually used to and to do that you need like I said a I and search powering like the google map underneath it, but you need an app like a yelp like app, that's what we deliver. So for example, uh just last week we delivered a service now app on snowflake. You know, it just changes the game. You are thinking about customer cases. You're a large company, you have support coming from Philippines and India some places the quality is good. Some places bad dashboards are not good enough saying that okay, 17% of our customers are unhappy but we are good. That's not the world we live in. That is the tyranny of >>average, >>17% were unhappy. You got to solve for them. >>You mentioned snowflake and they had their earnings. David and I were commenting about how some of the analysts got it all wrong. And you bring up a really good point that kind of highlights the real trend. Not so much how many new customers they got. But there do what customers are doing more. Right? So, so what's happening is that you're starting to see with data apps, it does imply Softwares in there because it's it's application. So the software wrapping around data. This is interesting because people that are using the snowflakes of the world and thought spot your software and your platform, they're doing more with data. So it's not so much. I use snowflake, I use snowflake now I'm going to do more with it. That's the scale kicking. So this is an opportunity to look at that more equation. How do you talk >>with >>when you see that? Because that's the real thing is like, okay, that's I bought software as a service. But what's the more that's happening? What do you see >>that is such an important point? Even I haven't thought about it that john but you're absolutely right. That is sometimes people think of snowflake is taking care of it and no. Yeah, yes, Sarah later used to store once and zeros and they're moving it into club. That is not the point. Like I said, marketplace as an example when you are opening it up for for example, bringing the entire world's data with one click accessible to you securely. That is something you couldn't do on number two. You can have like 100 suppliers and all of a sudden you can now take a single copy of data and then make it available to all of them without actually creating multiple copies and control it differently. That's not something without cloudy, potentially could do. So things like that are fundamentally different. It is much more than like one plus one equals two. It is one plus one is 33. Like our view is that when you are re platform ng like that, you have to think from customer first. What does the customer do? The customer care that you meant from Entre into cloud or event from Teradata snowflake. No, they will care if their lives are better. Are they able to get better services are able to get it faster. That's what it is. So to me it is very simple. The destiny of an insight or data information is action, right? Imagine you're driving a car and if your car updates the gas tank every monday morning, imagine how you know, stressful your life will be for the whole week. I have to wait until next monday wanting to figure out what, whether I have enough gas or not, that's not the new world, that information is there, you need to have it real time and act on it. If you go through the Tesla you realize now that you know, I'm never worried about mileage because it is going to take me to the supercharger because it knows what I need to get to, it knows how long it is going to be, how bad the traffic is. It is synthesizing all of that to give me peace of mind. >>So this is a great >>conversation. That's a >>great question. It's a great conversation because it's really kind of brings in kind of what's happening, you see successful companies that are working with cloud scale and data like you're talking about, it's you get in there, you get the data, the data apps and all of a sudden you hit it, you hit the value equation and it's like almost like discovering oil all of a sudden you have a gusher and then people just see massive increase in value. It's not like the outcome, it's kind of there, you've got to kind of get in there and this is the scale piece and you see people having strategies to do that, they say okay we're gonna get in there, we're going to use the data to iterate but also watch the data learn where's that value, This is that more trend and and there's a successful of the developing. So I have to ask you when you, when you talk about people and culture, um that's not the way it used to be, used to be like okay I'm buying an outcome. I deployed some software mechanisms and at the end of the day there's some value there. Maybe I write it off maybe I, you know, overtime charges and some accounting thing. All changed the culture and the people in charge now are transforming the management techniques. What do you see as a successful mindset for a customer as they managed through these new paradigms and new new success formulas. >>I see a fork in leadership when it comes to courage. There are people with the spine and there are people without the spine and the ones with the spine are absolutely killing it. They are unafraid. They are not saying, look, I'm just going to stick with the incumbents that I've known for the last 20 years. Look, I used to drive a Toyota forever because I love the Toyota. And then you know after Nutanix IPO went to Lexus still Toyota because it's reliable. I don't, I'm not a huge card person. It works. But guess what? I knew they were missing Patrick and I care about the environment. I don't want to keep pushing hydrocarbons out there. It's not politics. I just don't like burning stuff into the earth atmosphere. So when Tesla came out, it's not like I love the quality I don't personally like alone mask, you know after that Thailand fiasco of cave rescue and all of that. But I can clearly see that Toyota is not going to catch up to Tesla in the next 10 years. And guess what? My loyalty is much more to doing the right thing for my family and to the world. And I switched this is what business leaders need to know. They can't simply say, well, tabloid as search to. They're not as good as thought sports. We'll just stick with them because they have done with us. That's what weak leaders do and customers suffer for that. What I see like the last two weeks ago when I was in new york. I met with them. A business leader for one of the largest banks in the world with 25,000 people reporting to him. The person walks into the room wearing shorts and t shirts uh, and was so full of energy and so full of excitement. I thought I'm going to learn from him and he was asking questions about how we do our business in bed and learning from me. I was humbled, I was flawed and I realized that's what a modern business leader looks like. Even if it is one of the largest and oldest banks in the world, that's the kind of people are making big difference and it doesn't matter how all the companies, how old their data is they have mainframes or not. I hear this excuses all the type of er, mainframes, we can't move, we have COBOL going on. And guess what? You keep talking about that and hear leaders like him are going to transform those companies And next thing you know, there are some of the most modern companies in the world. >>Well certainly they, we know that they don't have any innovation strategy or any kind of R and D or anything going on that could be caught flat footed in the companies that didn't have that going on, didn't have the spine or the, the, the vision to, to at least try the cloud before Covid when Covid hit, those companies are really either going out of business or they're hurting the people who were in the cloud really move their teams into the cloud quicker to take advantage of uh, the environment that they had to. So this became a skill issue. So, so this is a big deal. This is a big deal. And having the right skills are people skilled, it will be a, I both be running everything for them. What is your take on that? >>This is an important question. You can't just say you got to do more things or new things and not take care of all things. You know, there's only 89, 10 hours so you can work in their uh, analysts in the Atlantic species constantly if your analysts are sitting there and making incremental dashboards and reports change every day and then backlog is growing for 56 days and the users are unhappy because you're not getting answers and then you ask them to go to new things. It's just not going to be enough and you can hire your way out of it. You have to make sure that if you say that I have 20 100 x product already, I don't want 21st guess what? Sometimes to be five products, you need to probably go to 21 you got to do new things to actually take away the gunk off the old and in that context, the re skilling starts with unburdening, unburdening of menial task, unburned routine task. There is nothing more frustrating than making reports and dashboards that people don't even use And 90% of the time analysts, they're amazing experiences completely wasted when they're making incremental change to tabloid reports. I kind of believe thought spot and self service on top of cloud data takes away all of that without compromising security and then you invest the experienced people. Business experience is so critical. So don't just go and hire university students and say, okay, they'll go come and quote everything the experience that they have in knowing what the business is about and what it matters to their users, that domain experience and then uplevel them res kill them and then bring fresh energy to challenge that and then make sure there is a culture that allows that to happen. These three things. That's why I said leadership is not just about hiring event of firing another, it's about cultivating a culture and living that value by saying, look if I am wrong, call me, call me out in public because I want to show you how I deal with conflict. So this is I love this thing because when I see these large companies where they're making these massive changes so fast, it inspires you to say you know what if they can do it, anyone can do it. But then I also see if the top leadership is not aligned to that. They are just trying to retire without the stock tanking too much and let me just get through two more years. The entire company suffers. >>So that's great to chat with you got great energy, love your business, love the energy, love the focus. Um it's a new wave you're on. It's a big wave um and it's it's relevant, it's cool and relevant and it's the modern way and people have to have a spine to be successful if not for the faint of heart, but the rewards are there if you get this right. This is what I I love about this new environment. Um so I gotta ask you just to kind of close it out. How would you plug the company for the folks watching that might want to engage with you guys. What's the elevator pitch? What's the positioning? How would you describe thought spot in a bumper sticker or in a positioning statement. Take a minute to talk about that. >>Remember martin Anderson said that software is eating the world, I think it is now time to update that data is eating everything including software. If you don't have a way to turn data into bespoke action for your customers. Guess what? Your customers are gonna go somewhere where they that's happening right? You may not be in the data business but the data company is going to take your business. Thought spot is very simple. We want to be the friend tent for all cloud data when it comes to structured because that's where business value numbers is world satisfaction and dissatisfaction for reduces allying it is important to move data to action and thought Spot is the pioneer in doing that through search and I >>I really think you guys want something very powerful. Looking forward to chatting with you at the upcoming eight of a startup showcase. I think data is a developer mindset. It's an app, it's part of everything. It will. Everyone's a data company, everyone is a media company. Data is everything you guys are on something really big and people got a program it with it, make experiences whether it's simple scripts, point and click. That is a new kind of developer out there. You guys are tapping into it. Great stuff. Thank >>you for coming on. Thank you john it's good to talk to you. >>Okay. It's a cube conversation here in Palo alto California were remote. We're virtual. That's the cube virtual. I'm sean for your host. Thanks for watching. Mhm. Mhm
SUMMARY :
around the rise of the cloud and the massive opportunities and challenges around analytics data you have and do this face to face but zoom is not bad. that the Covid and now the covid is looking at coming out of covid with growth strategies. So the worst thing you can do is to take my data and still treat me like an average and numbers but also on the developer side where apps are being developed if you don't have the data access, sort of like the newspaper, the information that you can't talk back. How is it changing business than the rules of business? It is the only way and if you fail to take that you guys see that customers should pay attention to with thought spot and in general because the I improve my own logic so that the next interaction, the next situation is going to be significantly better. which you mentioned at the beginning of this conversation, you mentioned data apps which by the but the one that doesn't talk back to you is going to be available inside the app that you built for You got to solve for them. And you bring up a really good point that kind of highlights the real trend. What do you see and all of a sudden you can now take a single copy of data and then make it available to all of them That's a So I have to ask you when you, when you talk about people and culture, um that's not the way it used to be, leaders like him are going to transform those companies And next thing you know, in the cloud really move their teams into the cloud quicker to take advantage It's just not going to be enough and you can hire your way out of it. So that's great to chat with you got great energy, love your business, love the energy, You may not be in the data business but the data company is going to take your business. Looking forward to chatting with you at the upcoming eight of a startup showcase. Thank you john it's good to talk to you. That's the cube virtual.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Toyota | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Louisiana | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Philippines | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lexus | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wednesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sarah | PERSON | 0.99+ |
15 minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1990s | DATE | 0.99+ |
Patrick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2025 | DATE | 0.99+ |
five products | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
25,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
martin Anderson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
56 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
new york | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sudheesh Nair | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Yesterday morning | DATE | 0.99+ |
17% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100 suppliers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
33 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two more years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one click | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
21st | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
john | PERSON | 0.99+ |
google map | TITLE | 0.99+ |
next monday | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Yelp | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
last two weeks ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
Covid | PERSON | 0.97+ |
15 models | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
zeros | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Teradata | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.97+ |
Palo alto California | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
delta variants | OTHER | 0.96+ |
Delaware | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
three subsequent questions | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
10 question | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
single copy | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one conversation | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
earth | LOCATION | 0.93+ |
21 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
10 models | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
COBOL | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
google maps | TITLE | 0.91+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
next 10 years | DATE | 0.9+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.9+ |
Atlantic | LOCATION | 0.89+ |
two major things | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
ThoughtSpot | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
$40 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
hundreds of billions of rows of data | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Hurricane IDa | EVENT | 0.83+ |
20 100 x | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
trillions of rows of | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
Michael Perera, IBM | IBM Think 2021
>> Narrator: From around the globe, it's the CUBE with digital coverage of IBM Think 2021, brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back to IBM Think 2021. My name is Dave Vellante. And I'm pleased to welcome onto the CUBE, our next guest, Michael Perera, who is the general manager for IBM Technology Support Services. Hello Michael, good to see you. >> Hi Dave, how are you? Thanks for having me. >> Yeah, my pleasure. Look, everybody wants to talk about transformation. And we're going to talk about how to do that while at the same time running your business. So Michael, talk about some of the challenges that businesses are facing today, they got to keep the lights on, they got to deal with remote workers, they got to continue to bring new products and services, they're dealing with cloud migration, they got new security that has to worry about endpoint and identifying their own workers in a different way. Budget serves are depressed are numbers, you know, our numbers between four minus four minus 5% last year, we're seeing a big uptick this year. But you guys TSS right in the middle of all that, what are you seeing? >> Yeah, so we're kind of in the boiler room, so to speak, supporting our clients across the board, hardware, software, and everything else, and ultimately ensuring that our clients keep the lights on, while they also transform as we go forward. You know, for me, the last year has really just accelerated with the pandemic, all of the challenges. And it really brought shining light on those challenges that you just mentioned, that all of our clients are trying to deal with, you know, not just how do they keep the lights on? But how do they transform at the same time, this world of hybrid cloud? And what do they choose to keep versus what do they move? How do they integrate those things together? How do they carve out budget, as well as time in order to make all those things happen, which those are generally conflicting forces of the universe. And then, you know, on top of all that, you take COVID, and the pandemic and the shift from many of our clients 100% face to face to 100% remote, almost overnight, from 80% face to face, 20% digital sales model to the reverse almost overnight. Our retail clients, many of which in May had transaction numbers far exceeding Cyber Monday and Black Friday, not something that they plan for, but they need to be able to adapt to it. And for it, while minimizing everything that they've known historically, right, which is counting on lower volumes at certain points in time of the month, or of the year. And all of that adds up to just a tremendous number of challenges for the infrastructure of our clients. We've jumped in, you know, arm and arm with them, being able to answer things like how do we help their teams who no longer have physical access to a site, be able to go and fix things when vendors are not allowed. So leveraging technology, like augmented reality, as an example, gaining visibility into those environments to avoid outages ahead of time based on these huge peaks that they hadn't expected or seen before. And then also bringing up brand new digital services, and what does that mean to the broader infrastructure and how they extend it and expand it in a way that is constrained physically and from an access perspective. So definitely an exciting time to say the least. And it's we've been weaving and bobbing and dodging and sprinting with our clients along the way. >> Well, let's talk about (murmurs), 'cause you had this tight budget climate that we both talked about. And it had basic infrastructure, you had to buy laptops, you know, secure the endpoints, maybe spin up some VDI and do some things that I hadn't planned on, and maybe, you know, HQ, maybe there's pent up demand there. I'd be interested in your thoughts, and maybe it's been sort of, you know, neglected over the past 12-14 months. And then I've got this, you know, we talked about digital transformation, pre pandemic. And, you know, there was some movement, of course, but there was also a lot of complacency. And then he had this forced march to digital, and it wasn't planned at all, it wasn't planned for, it wasn't strategic, it was just like, go. So what do you tell clients who are facing those budget pressures, they still got to get stuff done. And they really need to rethink or think through their cloud and digital transformation strategy. What's that conversation like? >> Well, the first part is we can help and we can help very clearly by saving them 30% on average on their IT spend in terms of maintenance. So we've done in conjunction with Forrester, we've done a study of almost 300 of our clients over the last year and 30% is the number that they have spent. And that's 30% opex, straight to the bottom line or straight to reinvest directly back into their business. So it's companies like McKesson, who's a health care services provider, who's been swamped, distributing COVID vaccines across the US and enabling them to scale on IBM Power and storage along with Cisco Networking, software, including Linux, what they do around hard drive retentions, as they're swapping things in and out and expanding in order to meet regulatory requirements. It's Vodafone in New Zealand, adding 3000 network devices due to increased traffic from COVID, where we could save them 20% right off the bat as part of our overall umbrella maintenance agreement and being the single point of contact for them. It's Banco Santader in Chile, who have their own custom branch infrastructure and giving them anywhere between the two to 24 hour response time, depending on the location, the ones that are in the Andes takes a little bit more time to get there sometime by helicopter versus road, but nonetheless, you know, providing that kind of support. So those are the types of things that, you know, we've been seeing and how we've been helping our clients, they take that money reinvest it back in, but also, they start to work better and smarter as they go. So, you know, we've also introduced a cloud based support insights platform, which has helped clients like Maple Leaf Foods in Canada give them access and visibility into what is their network look like? What are the devices that they've got? Where do they have security vulnerabilities and in identifying hardware and software bugs. So giving them the ability to work smarter, so that they can also not just save on opex and the money that they're paying somebody else for maintenance, but also so that they can put their resources to work more efficiently and as a result, be able to go spend more time on other things? >> So I want to double click on that. So you know, this gain sharing idea. Does IT get any of that? Or does it all go back to the CFO? In other words, you know, can they reinvest that in in technology? Or is it part of that? What are you seeing there is that pie in the sky thinking the CIO is going to be able to take that game share? >> No, I don't think it's pie in the sky at all. CIOs, in my experience, have a budget, right, and they're responsible and have control of that budget. So if they can clear headroom from that existing budget, an opex of which maintenance is a big piece of that then, you know, generally, that's their money, so to speak, to go spend on other places and redirect that investment so that as you're reporting to the CFO, then that numbers ultimately still tie back to whatever their budget is. >> So where are they spending those dollars? I mean, are there any patterns that you're discerning in terms of how they're applying them? I mean, people always say, we're going to shift it to more strategic areas. What specifically does that mean? >> Well, so you know, we're seeing a number of places which are not, you know, unique, to say the least when you look at security, as one example, if you look at move to public cloud, for certain workloads, as another enterprise agility is a third, resiliency is another. So those tend to be the top areas that we're seeing clients prioritizing, and in taking those savings that they get from working with us and then applying them other places from a technology perspective. But then you also have the workforce aspect, and where are they investing and work play safety is one training skills being another and then ultimately, employee engagement and satisfaction is the third. >> Now this might be a little bit out of your swim lane, but because you're in the boiler room, I'm going to ask I mean, when we talked about organizations, you know, shifting the focus of their teams to these more strategic initiatives to really try to get differentiation and build moats that a lot of times, there's skills gaps, so how are clients dealing with that challenge? >> Also, there's a couple of things that we're participating and co-creating with our clients on. So one of them is you're right there based on that skills gap. Training is one aspect. But you can also leverage technology in order to fill some of those skills gaps around technology, somewhat ironic. So open source as an example, and looking at what open source packages are compatible or not compatible. And people who have not necessarily spent a lot of time in open source may spend a ton of time trying to debug something which is just a matter of a mismatch on packages from different open source runtimes as an example, so that's one where we've got assets that we've developed that holds a full library of those interoperability between open source packages. Vulnerabilities is another one where, if you're highly skilled, you know where to go to find those vulnerabilities, you understand how to assess them, you understand which ones are important or which ones are not important. But if you're not, then having something that you can go use as a quick guide is can be very valuable. And again, another asset that that we've developed, and it's enabled clients to move very quickly and bring brand new applications to market. So as an example, National Telecom in Thailand who have developed an application for specifically for the COVID pandemic, based on open source in order to attract COVID testing and vaccine status for tourists, and essential personnel, all built on open source, given the critical nature of it, they needed it supported in a way that they could get immediate responses and fixes, not something that they have the skills to do on their own. So we ended up partnering them in order to do just that. >> Okay, so the training piece, you're teaching them to fish, and then you're automating the catch where possible. So let's talk about getting a lot of talk about cloud, public cloud, OnPrem, cross cloud, edge. I'm interested in hearing more about the integration challenges, the more this universe grows, the more complex it gets across all these locations. How are you helping clients address these integration challenges? >> Yeah, so, you know, I think that the ultimate promise of cloud was, oh, you just put it all in the cloud. And poof, everything magically happens. But the reality is, only 20% of the workloads are sitting in the cloud, which means 80% of them are sitting somewhere else. And the vast majority of those workloads need to interact together. And you can ask yourself, so why is it only 20%? And there's a litany of reasons why ranging from security to integration with data sources, regulatory requirements, which is why we IBM released the financial services, public cloud in order to deal with that for our clients and with ISVs. End to end visibility and scalability. So how do I know where the bottlenecks are? How do I know where the problem point was, and an end to end application that's built of microservices that are running all over the place, architectural flexibility and complexity across multiple vendors. So if I've got all of these moving parts from all of these different OEMs, or sources, how do I actually get support and know which part is broken? And who to call and when to call? And then, you know, ultimately, it boils down to skills, which we talked about before and time and money. So, again, you know, for us this is about taking the holistic approach, a heterogeneous approach, a hybrid approach, if you will, and being able to provide our clients with the end to end support for that hybrid environment. >> Alright, last question, big question. But we're not much time but, you know, the, we call it the new abnormal, look, bring out your telescope. We're not going back. Where are we going? What do you see? >> Well, so I agree 100%, that we're not going back. And the pandemic has certainly done nothing to change that perspective. In fact, it's just accelerated it from my point of view. And it's true in the adoption, and more acceptance, really, of digital everything compared to where it was. We see it today all the time with clients who may have been hesitant in remote support as an example. But now they're embracing it with arms wide open, areas where they would have asked for us to provide technical personnel to come in and fix something. Now, because of access to data centers or unlimited access to data centers, we're supporting them remotely leveraging augmented reality, and they're using their own people, we ship the parts, they use your own people, we walk them through it. And in doing all that, we've actually seen our industry leading Net Promoter Score go up, which is somewhat counterintuitive, because historically, without a pandemic, you would have thought, if we would have tried to push that type of technology on clients who are not really ready for it or accepting, our Net Promoter Scores would have gone the other direction. But you know, in practice, they're already outpacing industry by 20 points, and they've actually been going up significantly over the last few years time. So for us, this is about embracing digital, it's about embracing the hybrid cloud and hybrid environments. It's about partnering with our clients in order to give them what they need and when they need it and be flexible and agile along the way to help them scale so definitely an exciting time no doubt of where we are as well as where we're going. >> Love the story, Michael, I miss bread and butter. You know, maybe you guys don't get a lot of the headlines, I guess unless something goes wrong but so you don't get a lot of headlines. That's good news. But congratulations by the way on the NPS. That's awesome. And thanks for coming on the CUBE. >> Great, thanks for having me Dave. >> You're welcome, and thank you for watching everybody. Keep it right there for more great content from IBM Think 2021. This is Dave Vellante for the CUBE. (gentle music) (bright music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by IBM. And I'm pleased to welcome onto the CUBE, Thanks for having me. they got to deal with remote workers, the boiler room, so to speak, And they really need to rethink and 30% is the number the CIO is going to be able and redirect that investment to more strategic areas. to say the least when you look the skills to do on their own. Okay, so the training piece, and being able to provide our clients but, you know, the, Now, because of access to data centers And thanks for coming on the CUBE. This is Dave Vellante for the CUBE.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Michael Perera | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chile | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Banco Santader | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Maple Leaf Foods | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New Zealand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Forrester | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20 points | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Andes | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
24 hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
first part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
McKesson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.98+ |
one aspect | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
IBM Technology Support Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Cisco Networking | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
almost 300 | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Black Friday | EVENT | 0.95+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
single point | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.94+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
National Telecom | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
3000 network devices | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Cyber Monday | EVENT | 0.91+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.89+ |
NPS | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
5% | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
opex | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
COVID pandemic | EVENT | 0.81+ |
Think | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.8+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
IBM Power | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
12-14 | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
years | DATE | 0.71+ |
last | DATE | 0.69+ |
2021 | TITLE | 0.64+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
ton | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
COVID | EVENT | 0.62+ |
CUBE | TITLE | 0.53+ |
months | DATE | 0.46+ |
BOS13 Michael Perera VTT
(bright music) >> Narrator: From around the globe, it's the CUBE with digital coverage of IBM Think 2021, brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back to IBM Think 2021. My name is Dave Vellante. And I'm pleased to welcome onto the CUBE, our next guest, Michael Perera, who is the general manager for IBM Technology Support Services. Hello Michael, good to see you. >> Hi Dave, how are you? Thanks for having me. >> Yeah, my pleasure. Look, everybody wants to talk about transformation. And we're going to talk about how to do that while at the same time running your business. So Michael, talk about some of the challenges that businesses are facing today, they got to keep the lights on, they got to deal with remote workers, they got to continue to bring new products and services, they're dealing with cloud migration, they got new security that has to worry about endpoint and identifying their own workers in a different way. Budget serves are depressed are numbers, you know, our numbers between four minus four minus 5% last year, we're seeing a big uptick this year. But you guys TSS right in the middle of all that, what are you seeing? >> Yeah, so we're kind of in the boiler room, so to speak, supporting our clients across the board, hardware, software, and everything else, and ultimately ensuring that our clients keep the lights on, while they also transform as we go forward. You know, for me, the last year has really just accelerated with the pandemic, all of the challenges. And it really brought shining light on those challenges that you just mentioned, that all of our clients are trying to deal with, you know, not just how do they keep the lights on? But how do they transform at the same time, this world of hybrid cloud? And what do they choose to keep versus what do they move? How do they integrate those things together? How do they carve out budget, as well as time in order to make all those things happen, which those are generally conflicting forces of the universe. And then, you know, on top of all that, you take COVID, and the pandemic and the shift from many of our clients 100% face to face to 100% remote, almost overnight, from 80% face to face, 20% digital sales model to the reverse almost overnight. Our retail clients, many of which in May had transaction numbers far exceeding Cyber Monday and Black Friday, not something that they plan for, but they need to be able to adapt to it. And for it, while minimizing everything that they've known historically, right, which is counting on lower volumes at certain points in time of the month, or of the year. And all of that adds up to just a tremendous number of challenges for the infrastructure of our clients. We've jumped in, you know, arm and arm with them, being able to answer things like how do we help their teams who no longer have physical access to a site, be able to go and fix things when vendors are not allowed. So leveraging technology, like augmented reality, as an example, gaining visibility into those environments to avoid outages ahead of time based on these huge peaks that they hadn't expected or seen before. And then also bringing up brand new digital services, and what does that mean to the broader infrastructure and how they extend it and expand it in a way that is constrained physically and from an access perspective. So definitely an exciting time to say the least. And it's we've been weaving and bobbing and dodging and sprinting with our clients along the way. >> Well, let's talk about (murmurs), 'cause you had this tight budget climate that we both talked about. And it had basic infrastructure, you had to buy laptops, you know, secure the endpoints, maybe spin up some VDI and do some things that I hadn't planned on, and maybe, you know, HQ, maybe there's pent up demand there. I'd be interested in your thoughts, and maybe it's been sort of, you know, neglected over the past 12-14 months. And then I've got this, you know, we talked about digital transformation, pre pandemic. And, you know, there was some movement, of course, but there was also a lot of complacency. And then he had this forced march to digital, and it wasn't planned at all, it wasn't planned for, it wasn't strategic, it was just like, go. So what do you tell clients who are facing those budget pressures, they still got to get stuff done. And they really need to rethink or think through their cloud and digital transformation strategy. What's that conversation like? >> Well, the first part is we can help and we can help very clearly by saving them 30% on average on their IT spend in terms of maintenance. So we've done in conjunction with Forrester, we've done a study of almost 300 of our clients over the last year and 30% is the number that they have spent. And that's 30% opex, straight to the bottom line or straight to reinvest directly back into their business. So it's companies like McKesson, who's a health care services provider, who's been swamped, distributing COVID vaccines across the US and enabling them to scale on IBM Power and storage along with Cisco Networking, software, including Linux, what they do around hard drive retentions, as they're swapping things in and out and expanding in order to meet regulatory requirements. It's Vodafone in New Zealand, adding 3000 network devices due to increased traffic from COVID, where we could save them 20% right off the bat as part of our overall umbrella maintenance agreement and being the single point of contact for them. It's Banco Santader in Chile, who have their own custom branch infrastructure and giving them anywhere between the two to 24 hour response time, depending on the location, the ones that are in the Andes takes a little bit more time to get there sometime by helicopter versus road, but nonetheless, you know, providing that kind of support. So those are the types of things that, you know, we've been seeing and how we've been helping our clients, they take that money reinvest it back in, but also, they start to work better and smarter as they go. So, you know, we've also introduced a cloud based support insights platform, which has helped clients like Maple Leaf Foods in Canada give them access and visibility into what is their network look like? What are the devices that they've got? Where do they have security vulnerabilities and in identifying hardware and software bugs. So giving them the ability to work smarter, so that they can also not just save on opex and the money that they're paying somebody else for maintenance, but also so that they can put their resources to work more efficiently and as a result, be able to go spend more time on other things? >> So I want to double click on that. So you know, this gain sharing idea. Does IT get any of that? Or does it all go back to the CFO? In other words, you know, can they reinvest that in in technology? Or is it part of that? What are you seeing there is that pie in the sky thinking the CIO is going to be able to take that game share? >> No, I don't think it's pie in the sky at all. CIOs, in my experience, have a budget, right, and they're responsible and have control of that budget. So if they can clear headroom from that existing budget, an opex of which maintenance is a big piece of that then, you know, generally, that's their money, so to speak, to go spend on other places and redirect that investment so that as you're reporting to the CFO, then that numbers ultimately still tie back to whatever their budget is. >> So where are they spending those dollars? I mean, are there any patterns that you're discerning in terms of how they're applying them? I mean, people always say, we're going to shift it to more strategic areas. What specifically does that mean? >> Well, so you know, we're seeing a number of places which are not, you know, unique, to say the least when you look at security, as one example, if you look at move to public cloud, for certain workloads, as another enterprise agility is a third, resiliency is another. So those tend to be the top areas that we're seeing clients prioritizing, and in taking those savings that they get from working with us and then applying them other places from a technology perspective. But then you also have the workforce aspect, and where are they investing and work play safety is one training skills being another and then ultimately, employee engagement and satisfaction is the third. >> Now this might be a little bit out of your swim lane, but because you're in the boiler room, I'm going to ask I mean, when we talked about organizations, you know, shifting the focus of their teams to these more strategic initiatives to really try to get differentiation and build moats that a lot of times, there's skills gaps, so how are clients dealing with that challenge? >> Also, there's a couple of things that we're participating and co-creating with our clients on. So one of them is you're right there based on that skills gap. Training is one aspect. But you can also leverage technology in order to fill some of those skills gaps around technology, somewhat ironic. So open source as an example, and looking at what open source packages are compatible or not compatible. And people who have not necessarily spent a lot of time in open source may spend a ton of time trying to debug something which is just a matter of a mismatch on packages from different open source runtimes as an example, so that's one where we've got assets that we've developed that holds a full library of those interoperability between open source packages. Vulnerabilities is another one where, if you're highly skilled, you know where to go to find those vulnerabilities, you understand how to assess them, you understand which ones are important or which ones are not important. But if you're not, then having something that you can go use as a quick guide is can be very valuable. And again, another asset that that we've developed, and it's enabled clients to move very quickly and bring brand new applications to market. So as an example, National Telecom in Thailand who have developed an application for specifically for the COVID pandemic, based on open source in order to attract COVID testing and vaccine status for tourists, and essential personnel, all built on open source, given the critical nature of it, they needed it supported in a way that they could get immediate responses and fixes, not something that they have the skills to do on their own. So we ended up partnering them in order to do just that. >> Okay, so the training piece, you're teaching them to fish, and then you're automating the catch where possible. So let's talk about getting a lot of talk about cloud, public cloud, OnPrem, cross cloud, edge. I'm interested in hearing more about the integration challenges, the more this universe grows, the more complex it gets across all these locations. How are you helping clients address these integration challenges? >> Yeah, so, you know, I think that the ultimate promise of cloud was, oh, you just put it all in the cloud. And poof, everything magically happens. But the reality is, only 20% of the workloads are sitting in the cloud, which means 80% of them are sitting somewhere else. And the vast majority of those workloads need to interact together. And you can ask yourself, so why is it only 20%? And there's a litany of reasons why ranging from security to integration with data sources, regulatory requirements, which is why we IBM released the financial services, public cloud in order to deal with that for our clients and with ISVs. End to end visibility and scalability. So how do I know where the bottlenecks are? How do I know where the problem point was, and an end to end application that's built of microservices that are running all over the place, architectural flexibility and complexity across multiple vendors. So if I've got all of these moving parts from all of these different OEMs, or sources, how do I actually get support and know which part is broken? And who to call and when to call? And then, you know, ultimately, it boils down to skills, which we talked about before and time and money. So, again, you know, for us this is about taking the holistic approach, a heterogeneous approach, a hybrid approach, if you will, and being able to provide our clients with the end to end support for that hybrid environment. >> Alright, last question, big question. But we're not much time but, you know, the, we call it the new abnormal, look, bring out your telescope. We're not going back. Where are we going? What do you see? >> Well, so I agree 100%, that we're not going back. And the pandemic has certainly done nothing to change that perspective. In fact, it's just accelerated it from my point of view. And it's true in the adoption, and more acceptance, really, of digital everything compared to where it was. We see it today all the time with clients who may have been hesitant in remote support as an example. But now they're embracing it with arms wide open, areas where they would have asked for us to provide technical personnel to come in and fix something. Now, because of access to data centers or unlimited access to data centers, we're supporting them remotely leveraging augmented reality, and they're using their own people, we ship the parts, they use your own people, we walk them through it. And in doing all that, we've actually seen our industry leading Net Promoter Score go up, which is somewhat counterintuitive, because historically, without a pandemic, you would have thought, if we would have tried to push that type of technology on clients who are not really ready for it or accepting, our Net Promoter Scores would have gone the other direction. But you know, in practice, they're already outpacing industry by 20 points, and they've actually been going up significantly over the last few years time. So for us, this is about embracing digital, it's about embracing the hybrid cloud and hybrid environments. It's about partnering with our clients in order to give them what they need and when they need it and be flexible and agile along the way to help them scale so definitely an exciting time no doubt of where we are as well as where we're going. >> Love the story, Michael, I miss bread and butter. You know, maybe you guys don't get a lot of the headlines, I guess unless something goes wrong but so you don't get a lot of headlines. That's good news. But congratulations by the way on the NPS. That's awesome. And thanks for coming on the CUBE. >> Great, thanks for having me Dave. >> You're welcome, and thank you for watching everybody. Keep it right there for more great content from IBM Think 2021. This is Dave Vellante for the CUBE. (gentle music) (bright music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by IBM. And I'm pleased to welcome onto the CUBE, Thanks for having me. they got to deal with remote workers, the boiler room, so to speak, And they really need to rethink and 30% is the number the CIO is going to be able and redirect that investment to more strategic areas. to say the least when you look the skills to do on their own. Okay, so the training piece, and being able to provide our clients but, you know, the, Now, because of access to data centers And thanks for coming on the CUBE. This is Dave Vellante for the CUBE.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Michael Perera | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Maple Leaf Foods | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chile | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Forrester | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Banco Santader | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 points | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New Zealand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Andes | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
24 hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM Technology Support Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one aspect | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.99+ |
first part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3000 network devices | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.98+ |
McKesson | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
Cisco Networking | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
National Telecom | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
almost 300 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.95+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Black Friday | EVENT | 0.93+ |
single point | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Cyber Monday | EVENT | 0.91+ |
5% | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.89+ |
NPS | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
COVID pandemic | EVENT | 0.83+ |
opex | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
IBM Power | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
one training | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
last few years | DATE | 0.66+ |
COVID | EVENT | 0.65+ |
12-14 | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
months | DATE | 0.62+ |
ton | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
COVID | TITLE | 0.54+ |
time | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
CUBE | TITLE | 0.52+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.5+ |
Think | TITLE | 0.37+ |
Michael Sotnick, Pure Storage & Rob Czarnecki, AWS Outposts | AWS re:Invent 2020 Partner Network Day
>>from >>around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020. Special coverage sponsored by AWS Global Partner Network. >>Hi. Welcome to the Cube. Virtual and our coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 with special coverage of a PM partner experience. I'm John for your host. We are the Cube. Virtual. We can't be there in person with a remote. And our two next guests are We have pure storage. Michael Slotnick, VP of Worldwide Alliances, Pure storage. And Robert Czarnecki, principal product manager for a U. S. Outposts. Welcome to the Cube. >>Wonderful to be here. Great to see you. And thanks for having us, >>Michael. Great to see you pure. You guys had some great Momenta, um, earnings and some announcements. You guys have some new news? We're here. Reinvent all part of a W s and outpost. I want to get into it right away. Uh, talk about the relationship with AWS. I know you guys have some hot news. Just came out in late November. We're here in the event. All the talk is about new higher level services. Hybrid edge. What do you guys doing? What's the story? >>Yeah, Look, I gotta tell you the partnership with AWS is a very high profile and strategic partnership for pure storage. We've worked hard with our cloud block store for AWS, which is an extensive bility solution for pure flash array and into a W s. I think the big news and one of things that we're most proud of is the recent establishment of pure being service ready and outpost ready. And the first and Onley on Prem storage solution and were shoulder to shoulder with AWS is a W s takes outpost into the data center. Now they're going after key workloads that were well known for. And we're very excited Thio, partner with AWS in that regard, >>you know, congratulations to pure. We've been following you guys from the beginning since inception since it was founded startup. And now I'll see growing public company on the next level kind of growth plan. You guys were early on all this stuff with with with flash with software and cloud. So it's paying off. Rob, I wanna get toe Outpost because this was probably most controversial announcements I've ever covered at reinvent for the past eight years. It really was the first sign that Andy was saying, You know what? We're working backwards from the customers and they all are talking Hybrid. We're gonna have Outpost. Give us the update. What kind of workloads and verticals are seeing Success without post? Now that that's part of the portfolio, How does it all working out? Give us the update on the workloads in the verticals. >>Absolutely. Although I have to say I'd call it more exciting than controversial. We're so excited about the opportunities that outpost opened for our customers. And, you know, customers have been asking us for years. How can we bring AWS services to our data centers? And we thought about it for a long time. And until until we define the outpost service, we really I thought we could do better. And what outpost does it lets us take those services that customers are familiar with? It lets us bring it to their data center and and one of the really bright spots over the past year has just been how many different industries and market segments have shown interest. Outpost right. You could have customers, for example, with data residency needs, those that have to do local data processing. Uh, maybe have Leighton see needs on a specific workload that needs to run near their end users. We're just folks trying to modernize their data center, and that's a journey. That transformation takes time, right? So So Outpost works for all of those customers. And one of the things that's really become clear to us is that to enable the success that we think L Post can have, we need to meet customers where they are. And and one of the fantastic things about the outpost ready program is many of those customers air using pure and they have pure hardware and way. Send an outpost over to the pure lab recently, and I have to tell you a picture of those two racks next to each other looks really good. >>You know, 20 used to kind of welcome back my controversial comments. You know, I meant in the sense of that's when Cloud really got big into the enterprise and you have to deal with hybrid. So I do think it's exciting because the edges a big theme here. Can you just share real quick before I get in some of the pure questions on this edge piece with the hybrid because what what's the customer need? And when you talk to customers, I know you guys, you know, really kind of work backwards from the customer. What are their needs? What causes them to look at Outpost as part of their hybrid? What's the Keith consideration? >>Yeah, so? So there are a couple of different needs. John, right? One, for example, is way have regions and local zones across the globe. But we're not everywhere and and their their data residency regulations that they're becoming increasingly common and popular. So customers I come to us and say, Look, I really need to run, for example, of financial services workload. It needs to be in Thailand, and we don't have a reason or local zone in Thailand. But we could get him an outpost to to places where they need to be right. So the that that requirement to keep data, whether it's by regulation or by a contractual agreement, that's a that's a big driver. The other pieces there's There's a tremendous amount of interest in the that top down executive sponsorship across enterprise customers to transform their operations right to modernize their their digital approach but there, when they actually look a look at their estate, they do see an awful lot of hardware, and that's a hard challenge. Thio Plan the migration when you could bring an outpost right into that data center. It really makes it much easier because AWS is right there. There could be a monolithic architecture that it doesn't lend well toe having part of the workload running in the region, part of the workload running in their data center. But with an outpost, they can extend AWS to their data center, and that just makes it so much easier for them to get started on their digital transformation. >>Michael, this is This is the key trend. You guys saw early Cloud operations on premise. It becomes cloud ified at that point when you have Dev ops on on Premises and then cloud pure cloud for bursting all that stuff. And now you've got the edge exploding as well of growth and opportunity. What causes the customer to get the pure option on outputs? What's the What's the angle for you guys? Obviously storage, you get data and I can see this whole Yeah, there's no region and certainly outpost stores data, and that's a requirement for a lot of, you know, certainly global customers and needs. What's the pure angle on this? >>Yeah, I appreciate that. And appreciate Rob's comments around what AWS sees in the wild in terms of yours footprint in the market share that we've established his company over 11 years in business and, you know, over eight years of shipping product. You know, what I would tell you is one of the things that that a lot of people misses the simplicity and the consistency that air characteristically, you know very much in the AWS experience and equally within the pure experience and that that's really powerful. So as we were successful in putting pure into workloads that, you know, for for all the reasons that Rob talked about right data gravity, you know, the the regulatory issues, you know, just application architecture and its inability to move to the public cloud. Um, you know, our predictability are simplicity. Are consistency really match with the costumers getting with other work clothes that they had in AWS? And so with a W S outposts that's really bringing to the customer that single pane of glass to manage their entire environment. And so we saw that we made the three year investment in Outpost. Is Rob said Just having our solution? Inp Yours Data center. It's set up and running today with a solution built on flash Blade, which is our unstructured data solution and, you know, delivering fantastic performance results in a I and ML workloads. We see the same opportunity within backup and disaster recovery workloads and into analytics and then equally the opportunity toe build. You know, Flash Ray and our other storage solutions, and to build architectures with outposts in our data center and bring them to market >>real quick just to follow up on that. What use cases are you seeing that are most successful without post and in general in general, how do you guys get your customers to integrate with the rest of, uh, their environment? Because you you no one's got. Now this operating environments not just cloud public, is cloud on premise and everything else. >>Yeah, you know what's cool is, and then Rob hit right on. It is the the wide range of industries and the wide range of use cases and workloads that air finding themselves attracted to the outpost offering on DSO. You know, without a doubt there's gonna be, You know, I think what people would immediately believe ai and ml workloads and the importance of having high performance storage and to have a high performance outpost environment, you know, as close to the center as possible of those solutions. But it doesn't stop there. Traditional virtualized database workloads that for reasons of application architecture, aren't candidates to move. AWS is public cloud offering our great fit for outpost and those air workloads that we've always traditionally been successful within the market and see a great opportunity. Thio, you know, build on that success as an outpost partner. >>Rob, I gotta ask, you last reinvent when we're in person. When we had real life back then e was at the replay party and hanging out, and this guy comes out to me. I don't even know who he was. Obviously big time engineer over there opens his hand up and shows me this little processor and I'm like, closes and he's like and I go take a picture and it was like freaking out. Don't take a picture. It was it was the big processor was the big, uh, kind of person. Uh, I think it was the big monster. And it was just so small. See the innovation and hard where you guys have done a lot, there s that's cool. I like get your thoughts on where the future is going there because you've got great hardware innovation, but you got the higher level services with containers. I know you guys took your time. Containers are super important because that's going to deal with that. So how do you look at that? You got the innovation in the hardware check containers. How does that all fit in? Because you guys have been making a lot of investments in some of these cloud native projects. What's your position on that? >>You know, it's all part of one common story, John right customers that they want an easy path to delivering impact for their business. Right. And, you know, you've heard us speak a lot over the past few years about how we're really seeing these two different types of customers. We have those customers that really loved to get those foundational core building blocks and stitch them together in a creative way. But then you have more and more customers that they wanna. They wanna operate at a different level, and and that's okay. We want to support both of them. We want to give both of them all the tools that they need. Thio spend their time and put their resource is towards what differentiates their business and just be able to give them support at whatever level they need on the infrastructure side. And it's fantastic that are combination of investments in hardware and services. And now, with Outpost, we can bring those investments even closer to the customer. If you really think about it that way, the possibilities become limitless. >>Yeah, it's not like the simplicity asked, but it was pretty beautiful to the way it looks. It looks nice. Michael. Gotta ask you on your side. A couple of big announcements over that we've been following from pure looking back. You already had the periods of service announcement you bought the port Works was acquisition. Yeah, that's container management. Across the data center, including outposts you got pure is a service is pure. Is the service working with outpost and how and if so, how and what's the consumption model for customers there. >>Yeah, thanks so much, John. And appreciate you following us the way that you do it. Zits meaningful and appreciate it. Listen, you know, I think the customers have made it clear and in AWS is, you know, kind of led the way in terms of the consumption and experience expectations that customers have. It's got to be consumable. They've got to pay for what they use. It's got to be outcome oriented and and we're doing that with pure is a service. And so I think we saw that early and have invested in pure is a service for our customers. And, you know, we look at the way we acquired outposts as ah customer and a partner of AWS aan dat is exactly the same way customers can consume pure. You know, all of our solutions in a, you know, use what you need, pay for what you use, um, environment. And, you know, one of the exciting things about AWS partnership is its wide ranging and one of the things that AWS has done, I think world class is marketplace. And so we're excited to share with this audience, you know, really? On the back of just recent announcement that, pure is the service is available within the AWS marketplace. And so you think about the, you know, simplicity and the consistency that pure and AWS delivered to the market. AWS customers demand that they get that in the marketplace, and and we're proud to have our offerings there. And Port Works has been in the marketplace and and will continue to be showcased from a container management standpoint. So as those workloads increasingly become, you know, the cloud native you know, Dev Ops, Containerized workloads. We've got a solution and to end to support >>that great job. Great insight. Congratulations to pure good moves as making some good moves. Rob, I want to just get to the final word here on Outpost again. Great. Everyone loves this product again. It's a lot of attention. It's really that that puts the operating models cloud firmly on the in the on premise world for Amazon opens up a lot of good conversation and business opportunities and technical integrations or are all around you. So what's your message to the ecosystem out there for outposts? How do I What's the what's the word? I wanna do I work with you guys? How do I get involved? What are some of the opportunities? What's your position? How do you talk to the ecosystem? >>Yeah, You know, John, I think the best way to frame it is we're just getting started. We've got our first year in the books. We've seen so many promising signals from customers, had so many interesting conversations that just weren't possible without outposts. And, uh, you know, working with partners like pure and expanding our outpost. Ready program is just the beginning. Right? We launched back in September. We've We've seen another meaningful set of partners come out. Uh, here it reinvent, and we're gonna continue toe double down on both the outpost business, but specifically on on working with our partners. I think that the key to unlocking the magic of outpost is meeting customers where they are. And those customers are using our partners. And there's no reason that it shouldn't just work when they move there. Their partner based workload from their existing infrastructure right over to the outpost. >>All right, I'll leave it there. Michael saw the VP of worldwide alliances that pier storage congratulations. Great innovation strategy It's easy to do alliances when you've got a great product and technology congratulated. Rob Kearney Key principle product manager. Outpost will be speaking more to you throughout the next couple of weeks. Here at Reinvent Virtual. Thanks for coming. I appreciate it. >>Thank you. Thank you. >>Okay. So cute. Virtual. We are the Cube. Virtual. We wish we could be there in person this year, but it's a virtual event. Over three weeks will be lots of coverage. I'm John for your host. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube with digital coverage We are the Cube. Great to see you. Great to see you pure. And the first and Onley on Prem storage And now I'll see growing public company on the next level kind of growth plan. Send an outpost over to the pure lab recently, and I have to tell you a picture of those two racks next to I meant in the sense of that's when Cloud really got big into the enterprise and you So the that that requirement to keep data, What's the What's the angle for you guys? the the regulatory issues, you know, just application architecture and its inability in general in general, how do you guys get your customers to integrate with the rest of, the importance of having high performance storage and to have a high performance outpost See the innovation and hard where you guys have done And, you know, you've heard us speak a lot You already had the periods of service announcement you bought the port Works was acquisition. to share with this audience, you know, really? It's really that that puts the And, uh, you know, working with partners like pure and expanding our outpost. Outpost will be speaking more to you throughout the next couple of weeks. Thank you. We are the Cube.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Sotnick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Robert Czarnecki | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Czarnecki | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Slotnick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
late November | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rob Kearney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Reinvent Virtual | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two racks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS Global Partner Network | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
over 11 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
L Post | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over eight years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Leighton | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Outpost | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Keith | PERSON | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two next guests | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
outpost | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
first sign | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Over three weeks | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
2020 | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Worldwide Alliances | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.88+ |
single pane | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Flash Ray | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
U. S. | LOCATION | 0.87+ |
two different types | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
re:Invent 2020 Partner Network Day | EVENT | 0.84+ |
past year | DATE | 0.83+ |
outposts | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
past eight years | DATE | 0.8+ |
Breaking Analysis: Market Recoil Puts Tech Investors at a Fork in the Road
>> From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR, this is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> The steepest drop in the stock market since June 11th flipped the narrative and sent investors scrambling. Tech got hammered after a two-month run, and people are asking questions. Is this a bubble popping, or is it a healthy correction? Are we now going to see a rotation into traditional stocks, like banks and maybe certain cyclicals that have lagged behind the technology winners? Hello, everyone, and welcome to this week's episode of Wikibon's CUBE Insights powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we want to give you our perspective on what's happening in the technology space and unpack what this sentiment flip means for the balance of 2020 and beyond. Let's look at what happened on September 3rd, 2020. The tech markets recoiled this week as the NASDAQ Composite dropped almost 5% in a single day. Apple's market cap alone lost $178 billion. The Big Four: Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, and Google lost a combined value that approached half a trillion dollars. For context, this number is larger than the gross domestic product for countries as large as Thailand, Iran, Austria, Norway, and even the UAE, and many more. The tech stocks that have been running due to COVID, well, they got crushed. These are the ones that we've highlighted as best positioned to thrive during the pandemic, you know, the work-from-home, SaaS, cloud, security stocks. We really have been talking about names like Zoom, ServiceNow, Salesforce, DocuSign, Splunk, and the security names like CrowdStrike, Okta, Zscaler. By the way, DocuSign and CrowdStrike and Okta all had nice earnings beats, but they still got killed underscoring the sentiment shift. Now the broader tech market was off as well on sympathy, and this trend appears to be continuing into the Labor Day holiday. Now why is this happening, and why now? Well, there are a lot of opinions on this. And first, many, like myself, are relatively happy because this market needed to take a little breather. As we've said before, the stock market, it's really not reflecting the realities of the broader economy. Now as we head into September in an election year, uncertainty kicks in, but it really looks like this pullback was fueled by a combination of an overheated market and technical factors. Specifically, take a look at volatility indices. They were high and rising, yet markets kept rising along with them. Robinhood millennial investors who couldn't bet on sports realized that investing in stocks was as much of a rush and potentially more lucrative. The other big wave, which was first reported by the Financial Times, is that SoftBank made a huge bet on tech and bought options tied to around $50 billion worth of high-flying tech stocks. So the option call volumes skyrocketed. The call versus put ratio was getting way too hot, and we saw an imbalance in the market. Now market makers will often buy an underlying stock to hedge call options to ensure liquidity in these cases. So to be more specific, delta in options is a measure of the change in the price of an option relative to the underlying stock, and gamma is a measure of the volatility of the delta. Now usually, volatility is relatively consistent on both sides of the trade, the calls and the puts, because investors often hedge their bets. But in the case of many of these hot stocks, like Tesla, for example, you've seen the call skew be much greater than the skew in the downside. So let's take an example. If people are buying cheap out of the money calls, a market maker might buy the underlying stock to hedge for liquidity. And then if Elon puts out some good news, which he always does, the stock goes up. Market makers have to then buy more of the underlying stock. And then algos kick in to buy even more. And then the price of the call goes up. And as it approaches it at the money price, this forces market makers to keep buying more of that underlying stock. And then the melt up until it stops. And then the market flips like it did this week. When stock prices begin to drop, then market makers were going to rebalance their portfolios and their risk and sell their underlying stocks, and then the rug gets pulled out from the markets. And that's really why some of the stocks that have run dropped so precipitously. Okay, why did I spend so much time on this, and why am I not freaking out? Because I think these market moves are largely technical versus fundamental. It's not like 1999. We had a double whammy of technical rug pulls combined with poor underlying fundamentals for high-flying companies like CMGI and Internet Capital Group, whose businesses, they were all about placing bets on dot-coms that had no business models other than non-monetizable eyeballs. All right, let's take a look at the NASDAQ and dig into the data a little bit. And I think you'll see what I mean and why I'm not too concerned. This is a year-to-date chart of the NASDAQ, and you can see it bottomed on March 23rd at 6,860. And then ran up until June 11th and had that big drop, but was still elevated at 9,492. And then it ran up to over 12,000 and hit an all-time high. And then you see the big drop. And that trend continued on Friday morning. The NASDAQ Composite traded below 11,000. It actually corrected to 10% of its high, 9.8% to be precise, and then it snapped back. But even at its low, that's still up over 20% for the year. In the year of COVID, would that have surprised you in March? It certainly would have surprised me. So to me, this pullback is sort of a relief. It's good and actually very normal and quite predictable. Now the exact timing of these pullbacks, of course, on the other hand is not entirely predictable. Not at all, frankly, at least for this observer. So the big question is where do we go from here? So let's talk about that a little bit. Now the economy continues to get better. Take a look at the August job report; it was good. 1.4 million new jobs, 340,000 came from the government. That was positive numbers. And the other good news is it translates into a drop in unemployment under 10%. It's now at 8.4%. And this is really good relative to expectations. Now the sell-off continued, which suggested that the market wanted to keep correcting, so that's good. Maybe some buying opportunities would emerge in over the next several months, the market snapped back, but for those who have been waiting, I think that's going to happen. And so that snapback, maybe that's an indicator that the market wants to keep going up, we'll see. But I think there are more opportunities ahead because there's really so much uncertainty. What's going to happen with the next round of the stimulus? The jobs report, maybe that's a catalyst for compromise between the Democrats and the Republicans, maybe. The US debt is projected to exceed 100% of GDP this calendar year. That's the highest it's been since World War II. Does that give you a good feeling? That doesn't give me a good feeling. And when we talk about the election, that brings additional uncertainty. So there's a lot to think about for the markets. Now let's talk about what this means for tech. Well, as we've been projecting for months with our colleagues at ETR, despite what's going on in the stock market and its rise, there's those real tech winners, we still see a contraction in 2020 for IT spend of minus 5 to 8%. And we talk a lot about the bifurcation in the market due to COVID accelerating some of these trends that were already in place, like digital transformation and SaaS and cloud. And then the work-from-home kicks in with other trends like video conferencing and the shift to security spend. And we think this is going to continue for years. However, because these stocks have run up so much, they're going to have very tough compares in 2021. So maybe time for a pause. Now let's take a look at the IT spending macroeconomics. This data is from a series of surveys that ETR conducted to try to better understand spending patterns due to COVID. Those yellow slices of the pies show the percent of customers that indicate that their budgets will be impacted by coronavirus. And you can see there's a steady increase from mid-March, which blend into April, and then you can see the June data. It goes from 63% saying yes, which is very high, to 78%, which is very, very high. And the bottom part of the chart shows the degree of that change. So 22% say no change in the latest survey, but you can see much more of a skew to the red declines on the left versus the green upticks on the right-hand side of the chart. Now take a look at how IT buyers are seeing the response to the pandemic. This chart shows what companies are doing as a result of COVID in another recent ETR survey. Now of course, it's no surprise, everybody's working from home. Nobody's traveling for business, not nobody, but most people aren't, we know that. But look at the increase in hiring freezes and freezing new IT deployments, and the sharp rise in layoffs. So IT is yet again being asked to do more with less. They're used to it. Well, we see this driving an acceleration to automation, and that's going to benefit, for instance, the RPA players, cloud providers, and modern software vendors. And it will also precipitate a tailwind for more aggressive AI implementations. And many other selected names are going to continue to do well, which we'll talk about in a second, but they're in the work-from-home, the cloud, the SaaS, and the modern data sectors. But the problem is those sectors are not large enough to offset the declines in the core businesses of the legacy players who have a much higher market share, so the overall IT spend declines. Now where it gets kind of interesting is the legacy companies, look, they all have growth businesses. They're making acquisitions, they're making other bets. IBM, for example, has its hybrid cloud business in Red Hat, Dell has VMware and it's got work-from-home solutions, Oracle has SaaS and cloud, Cisco has its security business, HPE, it's as a service initiative, and so forth. And again, these businesses are growing faster, but they are not large enough to offset the decline in core on-prem legacy and drive anything more than flat growth, overall, for these companies at best. And by the time they're large enough, we'll be into the next big thing, so the cycle continues. But these legacy companies are going to compete with the upstarts, and that's where it gets interesting. So let's get into some of the specific names that we've been talking about for over a year now and make some comments around their prospects. So what we want to do is let's start with one of our favorites: Snowflake. Now Snowflake, along with Asana, JFrog, Sumo Logic, and Unity, has a highly anticipated upcoming IPO. And this chart shows new adoptions in the database sector. And you can see that Snowflake, while down from the October 19th survey, is far outpacing its competitors, with the exception of Google, where BigQuery is doing very well. But you see Mongo and AWS remain strong, and I'm actually quite encouraged that it looks like Cloudera has righted the ship and you kind of saw that in their earnings recently. But my point is that Snowflake is a share gainer, and we think will likely continue to be one for a number of quarters and years if they can execute and compete with the big cloud players, and that's a topic that we've covered extensively in previous Breaking Analysis segments, and, as you know, we think Snowflake can compete. Now let's look at automation. This is another space that we've been talking about quite a bit, and we've largely focused on two leaders: UiPath and Automation Anywhere. But I have to say, I still like Blue Prism. I think they're well-positioned. And I especially like Pegasystems, which has, for years, been embarking on a broader automation agenda. What this chart shows is net score or spending velocity data for those customers who said they were decreasing spend in 2020. Those red bars that we showed earlier are the ones who are decreasing. And you can see both Automation Anywhere and UiPath show elevated levels within that base where spending is declining, so that's a real positive. Now Microsoft, as we've reported, is elbowing its way into the market with what is currently an inferior point product, but, you know, it's Microsoft, so we can't ignore that. And finally, let's have a look at the all-important security sector, which we've covered extensively and put out a report recently. So what this next chart does is cherry-picks of a few of our favorite names, and it shows the net score or spending momentum and the granularity for some of the leaders and emerging players. All of these players are in the green, as you can see in the upper right, and they all have decent presence in the dataset as indicated by the shared NS. Okta is at the top of the list with 58% net score. Palo Alto, they're a more mature player, but still, they have an elevated net score. CrowdStrike's net score dropped this quarter, which was a bit of a concern, but it's still high. And it followed by SailPoint and Zscaler, who are right there. The big three trends in this space right now are cloud security, identity access management, and endpoint security. Those are the tailwinds, and we think these trends have legs. Remember, net score in this survey is a forward-looking metric, so we'll come back and look at the next survey, which is running this month in the field from ETR. Now everyone on this chart has reported earnings, except Zscaler, which reports on September 9th, and all of these companies are doing well and exceeding expectations, but as I said earlier, next year's compares won't be so easy. Oh, and by the way, their stock prices, they all got killed this week as a result of the rug pull that we explained earlier. So we really feel this isn't a fundamental problem for these firms that we're talking about. It's more of a technical in the market. Now Automation Anywhere and UiPath, you really don't know because they're not public and I think they need to get their house in order so they can IPO, so we'll see when they make it to public markets. I don't think that's an if, that I think they will IPO, but the fact that they haven't filed yet says they're not ready. Now why wouldn't you IPO if you are ready in this market despite the recent pullbacks? Okay, let's summarize. So listen, all you new investors out there that think stock picking is easy, look, any fool can make money in a market that goes up every day, but trees don't grow to the moon and there are bulls and bears and pigs, and pigs get slaughtered. And I can throw a dozen other cliches at you, but I am excited that you're learning. You maybe have made a few bucks playing the options game. It's not as easy as you might think. And I'm hoping that you're not trading on margin. But look, I think there are going to be some buying opportunities ahead, there always are, be patient. It's very hard, actually impossible, to time markets, and I'm a big fan of dollar-cost averaging. And young people, if you make less than $137,000 a year, load up on your Roth, it's a government gift that I wish I could have tapped when I was a newbie. And as always, please do your homework. Okay, that's it for today. Remember, these episodes, they're all available as podcasts, wherever you listen, so please subscribe. I publish weekly on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com, so check that out, and please do comment on my LinkedIn posts. Don't forget, check out etr.plus for all the survey action. Get in touch on Twitter, I'm @dvellante, or email me at david.vellante@siliconangle.com. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, everyone. Be well, and we'll see you next time. (gentle upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
bringing you data-driven and the shift to security spend.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CMGI | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
September 9th | DATE | 0.99+ |
SoftBank | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
March 23rd | DATE | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
8.4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Internet Capital Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
April | DATE | 0.99+ |
9,492 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
September 3rd, 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
$178 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
October 19th | DATE | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
June 11th | DATE | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Friday morning | DATE | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
half a trillion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
58% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Blue Prism | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1999 | DATE | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
June 11th | DATE | 0.99+ |
World War II. | EVENT | 0.99+ |
340,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
August | DATE | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
6,860 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
22% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mongo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
two leaders | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
9.8% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
63% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
78% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
david.vellante@siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Asana | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sumo Logic | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
around $50 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DocuSign | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ETR | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NASDAQ | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zoom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NASDAQ Composite | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
JFrog | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
SailPoint | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
mid-March | DATE | 0.98+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Pegasystems | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
under 10% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
ServiceNow | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Financial Times | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this month | DATE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
less than $137,000 a year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
BigQuery | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
almost 5% | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Sri Srinivasan, Cisco Collaboration | CUBE Conversation, April 2020
>> Announcer: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is the CUBE Conversation. >> Hello everybody, welcome to this special CXO Series that I've been running over the past couple weeks, my name is Dave Vellante and what I've been doing is bringing in executives from around the industry to try to better understand how they're dealing with this COVID crisis, what some of their fundamental communications principles are, and I'm really pleased to invite in Sri Srinivasan, who's the Senior Vice President and GM of Cisco Collaborations. Sri, great to see you again. It seems like just a long time ago actually, but it was just January that we were in Barcelona together, wow, a lot has changed. >> A lot has changed, Dave. Dave, thanks for having me on the show, it's always a pleasure to see you and I'm so happy to see you safe and sound today. >> Yeah, ditto, we're all in this together, as they say so I want to go back to, I mean we were in January we were getting clenches of this thing. We were definitely a little bit worried but not really fully grasping the impact. At what point did you kind of realize that you were going to have to adjust, and how did you shift your priorities as a leader? >> Yeah, so, Dave we started seeing this right out of the Chinese New Year, coming out of the Chinese New Year, on February 11th, if my memory serves me right. Users out of China started increasing, connecting to their global sites by multiples. Like, they went up as much as 22 times, on the night of February 11th and right off the bat we started seeing it expanding to South Korea, Japan, Singapore, Australia, Malaysia, Vietnam, Thailand, and towards the end of February, we started seeing it going to Europe in terms of expanded volumes where people working from home. Europe has expanded nearly four times for us, Asia pack has expanded nearly three to four times in terms of total usage and from the second week of March, it's US, our biggest market, which has more than doubled and as you may have heard, this past month in March, we served 324 million attendees on our meeting platform. We provide a whole slew of collaboration capability set. The fundamental principle for us that we apply is, provide customers with business continuity, while keeping their employees and their families safe. That is the fundamental principle we apply and one of my engineers said it really well. He said, "for every WebEx engineer-hour spent, "we now keep people safe for 14 thousand hours, "or 583 days". That is the amount of time through virtual capability set we're able to bring people together safely and continue their businesses forward as is nearly normal. >> I mean, the numbers are unbelievable. Chuck Robbins, over a month ago, said you guys held, and this is early March, 3.2 million meetings and 5.5 billion minutes, and the numbers have just gone up from then. Guys, I wonder if you could bring up the chart, I want to set up this conversation and so, we along with our partner ETR, we're one of the first to report sort of the impact of COVID on IT Budgets and what this chart is showing is that, that gray bar says 35% of those CIO's that we talked to said they don't expect any change in spending for 2020. >> Sri: Mhm. >> Dave: The green side over 20% said they expect to spend more and then you can see the big red. So overall, we've taken the overall forecast at the beginning of the year was plus 4% was kind of the consensus for IT spend. We're now down to minus 4%. The point though is that it would be a lot worse Sri, were it not for that green, which is being driven by the work from home offset, and it's not just collaborations tools, its networking, its security, its VPN, it's all the infrastructure around that so I wonder if you could comment and add a little bit of color to what you're seeing in the space. >> I think we're seeing immense expansion of work from home capabilities. Work from home is new for so many people, like for people like me it's the norm but there's so many people who are coming into it cold for the very first time, it can be daunting and that requires investments from organizations, I think CIOs IT infrastructure heads are working to make sure they provide the best secure collaboration canvas for people to work in from home, understanding the challenges of last mile excellence, security challenges and things of that sort so there is a ton of investment going on, in speeding up that investment and I see something coming out of this, which is recognition that organizations are going to have to fix and modernize their digital infrastructure. Why is that important? I think environmental sustainability has something called LEED Certification. Very similar to that work from home is going to have some type of certification that says, an organization is ready for this type of a mass upheaval moment where their infrastructures keep their businesses alive, kicking and thriving through any situation and I think what we have seen is many organizations struggle getting to that first step. Now, technology allows them to move very fast these days but no organization wants to struggle through it in the future, whether it's public sector or commercial enterprise, it's one and the same. >> I think that's a great point, one of the things I wanted to ask you was about some of the things that you've learned and maybe some of the things that are going to be permanent and I think that, people didn't expect this obviously and so do you feel as though that organizations will kind of rethink and that portions of this will become permanent, maybe they'll sub-optimize, in the near-term profitability and try to optimize for business resilience and the flexibility to do things like work from home, your thoughts. >> So Dave, I do see some things becoming permanent, right? Do I expect the volumes of collaboration to go down? No, it's never going to go back to the same level. The world as we know it is going to change forever. We are going to have a Post-COVID era and that's going to be changed for the better. There's a number of employees who are being skeptical, reticent to working from home, who are suddenly going to say, work from home thing is not so bad after all so you're going to have that moment for sure and then you're going to also have a set of employers who are going to look at a much wider pool of applicants that are cross timezone, geography, language barriers, it's going to help an organization increase their diversity and inclusiveness ocean, making their products and services much better so I think we are opening up the surface area for innovation as a result and you will see a lot of the work from home technologies get better and better, we're being forced to be better because we now have to be relatable, discernible easy to a new class of worker that has never seen these technologies and it is across all kinds of barriers that technology has to adhere itself to so I do see a lot of goodness coming in and you know what, at the end of the day, it's really good for the environment too >> I want to ask you how you're supporting customers. The data partner that I mentioned ETR, the other day I sat in one of their CIO Roundtables and it's a private conversation with (mumbles) and CIOs and they were asking them like, who's helping you through this and who's not and they mentioned, for instance, back in the 2009 timeframe, there was one company they won't mention. It was doing audits right after the crisis. That was not a cool thing but I got to give Cisco some props it came up that they really were helping in three areas and one of the CIOs just really mentioned this and called it out. He said, collaboration tools, network, we're a Cisco customer so we're relying more on the network and then the security piece so specifically how are you supporting your customers in this crisis? >> So, towards the end of February, what we did is we opened up our collaboration technology and Chuck said something very profound to me. He basically said, "let's make sure we do right by our customers "and keep them safe through this exercise." What we came out with was a set of free offers. We expanded (mumbles) free offer by providing unlimited meeting time, up to a hundred participants toll dial-in into our meetings infrastructure in 52 countries. We didn't basically just say, hey, only in countries afflicted by the virus, we basically made it as global as we could make it possible and then we provided enterprise trials through our partner routes to market that is an enterprise could sign up for a 90-day thing, no strings attached. Just take on the collaboration platform and whether it's calling, meetings, our device infrastructure and just take advantage of it and in a secure fashion using our security portfolio using extensions of our network portfolio and just continue to operate so we've added close to north of 15 million users through our free offers to date that (mumbles) >> Wow. >> and no strings attached. We're not asking for a credit card or a contract at the end of it, if you like it, and we come out at the other end of it, we are happy that they're safe and if they stay a long-term customer of ours, we are happy about that too. >> I mean, that's awesome. We saw recently a lot of talk about big tech and a lot of attacks on big tech and you're seeing big tech really step up, so thank you for that. You know us. We're not gotcha media, but it's I feel it's really important to ask you this. Zoom has had some clear issues with security. Eric Yuan, was instrumental in developing WebEx so what assurances can you give (Sri coughs) your customers and our audience that you're not subjected to similar security gaps and flaws? >> So let's talk about our security principles, right? Our security principles are very clear, we are open and transparent about the issues we face, the investments we make and we will be very open in terms of our posture. Secondly, we will never rent or sell customers data. Thirdly, we have a growth mindset around security. It's a differentiator. You never get complacent about security, you keep on investing in it and to be honest with you, WebEx has come a very long way since some of the comments that were made in the press by some of our competitors. circa 2012 WebEx versus now there's so much innovation that has happened Dave. We've had over 100 major software updates so I would rather have our competitors focus on their issues rather than, give us kudos in public. Our promise to our customers is to be open, transparent and continuously invest in the space because the moment you take your eyes off it, you've opened yourself up for a set of attacks so we're not going to ever say we are fully secure. You just have to continually invest in the growing threat posture world we live in today. >> So I want to follow up on that because I mean, I'm not a security expert, but I've interviewed enough people to know that they will tell you, you can't just bolt on security, you got to build it in and it's a hard thing to do. Some of your security pros Gee Rittenhouse, TK Keanini would definitely second this so, >> Yeah. >> How, you're saying you've spent a lot of time obviously designing in and I'm inferring not bolting on so I wonder if you could add some color to the sort of types of things that you've done to really, assure your customers that you're secure. >> Yeah, so I think security is in the DNA of Cisco, pun intended in many ways. We pride ourselves in our craft and to be honest with you, security starts at the time of design for us and it's not a checkbox exercise at the end of the ship cycle. You build for security. You build for privacy and compliance and you build with one simple rule. It's your customers data, we are custodians and we need to be protectors of it all the way through. We do not sacrifice experience for security. We never will. We build high-grade experiences but we never give up on security capability set and whether it's free, whether it's premium, whether it's paid. We have the same levels of security, yes, we do have additional security add ons and finally, we have a culture where there are groups within Cisco that continually test us. They don't report to me, they report to chuck and the board and they pretty much are continuously measuring our threat posture. These are world class organizations that keep you on your toes and I'm so thankful for that. It helps our customers safe, it helps us be better. It helps us stay current with the threat postures and this is years of investment. This is not something you can do in 90 days or 30 days. You'd be doing lip service to it. This is something you've got to do, critical, intentional, deliberate investments that pay off in the long-term. >> Yeah, and things like penetration testing, it's not a one shot deal, you got to do it on an ongoing basis. I want to come back to productivity. There are some organizations that are concerned they're struggling a little bit with productivity, particularly with the work from home. What advice would you give to organizations in terms of being able to maintain that productivity? They might take a little bit of hit but what would you tell them? >> I think change is difficult. Change is not easy. I'll take my own story here. Dave, two years back when I joined Cisco work from home was a alien culture to me based on where I came from, for the first month I did struggle. I had my questions, I had my trepidations of is this really going to work? Am I going to be able to run thousands of engineers, multibillion dollar business from home or while traveling on a plane because we have so many development centers across the globe and I'm a remote worker. I really saw this as opening up new horizons for me starting the first month. I took it on with gusto so I think my guidance to organizations is help end users deal with that change. If you force it down their throats, it's not going to work. You've got to understand their pains, you've going to make it more pleasing. You've got to introduce things like a digital water cooler talk, you've got to make it easy on them, you've got to talk about improvements in a remote-work setting like providing them with a set of accessories that make it easier for you to work from home. One of the core principles we have and i espouse within my organization is by working from home, you're intruding into your family's space. I think it's so important to make sure you let your family in on your work and when kids walk into the door, today, when we work at Cisco, we actually share our family and we share our joy with the wider teams and we are so proud of such culture so be very open and make sure that you understand that you're intruding into somebody else's house when you're working from home. >> Yeah, we have dogs barking, we have kids playing games and crawling all over us, that's great. one of the... >> The dogs barking we have solved we have an AI technology that brings it down. >> Mutes the barking. That's good, I need one. >> Absolutely. >> So one of my big takeaways and you really underscored it here is we're not going back to 2019. The digital transformation that we talk about and that frankly many give lip service (mumbles) but it is now going to be accelerated and it's ironic, we're starting a new decade but this digital transformation is going to be accelerated and collaboration is going to be a key underpinning so I'll ask you to give us some final thoughts, will you please? >> Yeah, I think, people to people collaboration is so important in this day and age. As such, industry has been changing from a task-based hierarchy driven world to a group-outcome based synergistic, a bring people along type culture and that brings people along type cultures now, thanks to collaboration technology, becoming independent of timezone, you don't have to worry about language barriers anymore or cultural boundaries. Think of the type of ideation you can do by bringing people across the world together with a low carbon footprint and what this time has shown us is that businesses can still continue to operate and operate really well when you bring people together using these virtual technologies and capability sets. You're saving people some time by having them work from home like you don't have to travel 30 and 40 minutes to get to work. You're just doing doing your thing from wherever you are and that saves so much in cost, in capability sets and the concept of hoteliering and open spaces in different organizations is only going to sprout even further because not everybody is going to have a home office, have an office, a set office, in within the enterprise CEOs are going to see that as a cost saving opportunity that they can funnel back into the growth of the organization. Right? So I think it's a plethora of opportunity in front of us and that these technologies are going to get monumentally better in the months to come. >> We're definitely entering a new chapter. Sri, thanks so much for sharing your insights and some of your leadership principles and thanks to Cisco, for all that you guys are doing some of the pro bono work. I know some of the volunteerism that Chuck has talked about. Really appreciate your time. >> Thanks Dave. Always a pleasure, stay safe. >> And thank you for watching everybody. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and Boston, and I'm really pleased to invite in Sri Srinivasan, and I'm so happy to see you safe and how did you shift your priorities as a leader? and from the second week of March, and the numbers have just gone up from then. and then you can see the big red. and that requires investments from organizations, and the flexibility to do things like and that's going to be changed for the better. and one of the CIOs just really mentioned this and just continue to operate and we come out at the other end of it, and a lot of attacks on big tech and to be honest with you, and it's a hard thing to do. and I'm inferring not bolting on and to be honest with you, Yeah, and things like penetration testing, and make sure that you understand that and crawling all over us, that's great. The dogs barking we have solved Mutes the barking. and collaboration is going to be a key underpinning 30 and 40 minutes to get to work. and thanks to Cisco, Always a pleasure, stay safe. And thank you for watching everybody.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chuck | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chuck Robbins | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Eric Yuan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
April 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
35% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
583 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2009 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
14 thousand hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
January | DATE | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
90-day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sri Srinivasan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
February 11th | DATE | 0.99+ |
90 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
22 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
illion users | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5.5 billion minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
early March | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vietnam | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Malaysia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
four times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
52 countries | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
end of February | DATE | 0.98+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Gee Rittenhouse | PERSON | 0.98+ |
ETR | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
plus 4% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
South Korea | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
two years back | DATE | 0.98+ |
one shot | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
minus 4% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one simple rule | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three areas | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
one company | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Chinese New Year | EVENT | 0.96+ |
Zoom | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
TK Keanini | PERSON | 0.95+ |
3.2 million meetings | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
WebEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
second week of March | DATE | 0.93+ |
first month | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
over 20% | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.93+ |
CUBE Conversation | EVENT | 0.93+ |
Thirdly | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Secondly | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
COVID | EVENT | 0.91+ |
Mark Clare, AstraZeneca & Glenn Finch, IBM | IBM CDO Summit 2019
>> live from San Francisco, California. It's the key. You covering the IBM chief Data officer? Someone brought to you by IBM. >> We're back at the IBM CDO conference. Fisherman's Worf Worf in San Francisco. You're watching the Cube, the leader in life tech coverage. My name is David Dante. Glenn Finches. Here's the global leader of Big Data Analytics and IBM, and we're pleased to have Mark Clare. He's the head of data enablement at AstraZeneca. Gentlemen, welcome to the Cube. Thanks for coming on my mark. I'm gonna start with this head of data Data Enablement. That's a title that I've never heard before. And I've heard many thousands of titles in the Cube. What is that all about? >> Well, I think it's the credit goes to some of the executives at AstraZeneca when they recruited me. I've been a cheap date officer. Several the major financial institutions, both in the U. S. And in Europe. Um, AstraZeneca wanted to focus on how we actually enable our business is our science areas in our business is so it's not unlike a traditional CDO role, but we focus a lot more on what the enabling functions or processes would be >> So it sounds like driving business value is really the me and then throw. Sorry. >> I've always looked at this role in three functions value, risk and cost. So I think that in any CDO role, you have to look at all three. I think the you'd slide it if you didn't. This one with the title. Obviously, we're looking at quite a bit at the value we will drive across the the firm on how to leverage our date in a different way. >> I love that because you can quantify all three. All right, Glenn. So you're the host of this event. So awesome. I love that little presentation that you gave. So for those you didn't see it, you gave us pay stubs and then you gave us a website and said, Take a picture of the paste up, uploaded, and then you showed how you're working with your clients. Toe. Actually digitize that and compress all kinds of things. Time to mortgage origination. Time to decision. So explain that a little bit. And what's that? What's the tech behind that? And how are people using it? You know, >> for three decades, we've had this OCR technology where you take a piece of paper, you tell the machine what's on the paper. What longitudinal Enter the coordinates are and you feed it into the hope and pray to God that it isn't in there wrong. The form didn't change anything like that. That's what that's way. We've lived for three decades with cognitive and a I, but I read things like the human eye reads things. And so you put the page in and the machine comes back and says, Hey, is this invoice number? Hey, is this so security number? That's how you train it as compared to saying, Here's what it So we use this cognitive digitization capability to grab data that's locked in documents, and then you bring it back to the process so that you can digitally re imagine the process. Now there's been a lot of use of robotics and things like that. I'm kind of taken existing processes, and I'm making them incrementally. Better write This says look, you now have the data of the process. You can re imagine it. However, in fact, the CEO of our client ADP said, Look, I want you to make me a Netflix, not a blood Urbach Blockbuster, right? So So it's a mind shift right to say we'll use this data will read it with a I will digitally re imagine the process. And it usually cuts like 70 or 80% of the cycle time, 50 to 75% of the cost. I mean, it's it's pretty groundbreaking when you see it. >> So markets ahead of data neighborhood. You hear something like that and you're not. You're not myopically focused on one little use case. You're taking a big picture of you doing strategies and trying to develop a broader business cases for the organization. But when you see an example like that and many examples out there, I'm sure the light bulbs go off. So >> I wrote probably 10 years cases down while >> Glenn was talking about you. You do get tactical, Okay, but but But where do you start when you're trying to solve these problems? >> Well, I look att, Glenn's example, And about five and 1/2 years ago, Glenn was one I went to had gone to a global financial service, firms on obviously having scale across dozens of countries, and I had one simple request. Thio Glenn's team as well as a number of other technology companies. I want cognitive intelligence for on data in Just because the process is we've had done for 20 years just wouldn't scale not not its speed across many different languages and cultures. And I now look five and 1/2 years later, and we have beginning of, I would say technology opportunities. When I asked Glenn that question, he was probably the only one that didn't think I had horns coming out of my head, that I was crazy. I mean, some of the leading technology firms thought I was crazy asking for cognitive data management capabilities, and we are five and 1/2 years later and we're seeing a I applied not just on the front end of analytics, but back in the back end of the data management processes themselves started automate. So So I look, you know, there's a concept now coming out day tops on date offices. You think of what Dev Ops is. It's bringing within our data management processes. It's bringing cognitive capabilities to every process step, And what level of automation can we do? Because the, you know, for typical data science experiment 80 to 90% of that work Estate engineering. If I can automate that, then through a date office process, then I could get to incite much faster, but not in scale it and scale a lot more opportunities and have to manually do it. So I I look at presentations and I think, you know, in every aspect of our business, where we clear could we apply >> what you talk about date engineering? You talk about data scientist spending his or her time just cleaning the wrangling data, All the all the not fun stuff exactly plugging in cables back in the infrastructure date. >> You're seeing horror stories right now. I heard from a major academic institution. A client came to them and their data scientists. They had spent several years building. We're spending 99% of their time trying to cleanse and prep data. They were spend 90% cleansing and prepping, and of the remaining 10% 90% of that fixing it where they fix it wrong and the first time so they had 1% of their job doing their job. So this is a huge opportunity. You can start automating more of that and actually refocusing data science on data >> science. So you've been a chief data officer number of financial institutions. You've got this kind of cool title now, which touches on some of the things a CDO might do and your technical. We got a technical background. So when you look a lot of the what Ginny Rometty calls incumbents, call them incumbent Disruptors two years ago at Ivy and think they've got data that has been hardened, you know, in all these projects and use cases and it's locked and people talk about the silos, part of your role is to figure out Okay, how do we get that data out? Leverage. It put it at the core. Is that is that fair? >> Well, and I'm gonna stay away from the word core cause to make core Kenan for kind of legacy processes of building a single repositories single warehouse, which is very time consuming. So I think I can I leave it where it is, but find a wayto to unify it. >> Not physically, exactly what I say. Corny, but actually the court, that's what we need >> to think about is how to do this logically and cream or of Ah unification approach that has speed and agility with it versus the old physical approaches, which took time. And resource is >> so That's a that's a computer science problem that people have been trying to solve for years. Decentralized, distributed, dark detectors, right? And why is it that we're now able Thio Tap your I think it's >> a perfect storm of a I of Cloud, the cloud native of Io ti, because when you think of I o. T, it's a I ot to be successful fabric that can connect millions of devices or millions of sensors. So you'd be paired those three with the investment big data brought in the last seven or eight years and big data to me. Initially, when I started talking to companies in the Valley 10 years ago, the early days of, um, apparatus, what I saw or companies and I could get almost any of the digital companies in the valley they were not. They were using technology to be more agile. They were finding agile data science. Before we call the data signs the map produce and Hadoop, we're just and after almost not an afterthought. But it was just a mechanism to facilitate agility and speed. And so if you look at how we built out all the way up today and all the convergence of all these new technologies, it's a perfect storm to actually innovate differently. >> Well, what was profound about my producing in the dupe? It was like leave the data where it is and shipped five megabytes a code two upended by the data and that you bring up a good point. We've now, we spent 10 years leveraging that at a much lower cost. And you've got the cloud now for scale. And now machine intelligence comes in that you can apply in the data causes. Bob Pityana once told me, Data's plentiful insights aren't Amen to that. So Okay, so this is really interesting discussion. You guys have known each other for a couple of couple of decades. How do you work together toe to solve problems Where what is that conversation like, Do >> you want to start that? >> So, um, first of all, we've never worked together on solving small problems, not commodity problems. We would usually tackle something that someone would say would not be possible. So normally Mark is a change agent wherever he goes. And so he usually goes to a place that wants to fix something or change something in an abnormally short amount of time for an abnormally small amount of money. Right? So what's strange is that we always find that space together. Mark is very judicious about using us as a service is firm toe help accelerate those things. But then also, we build in a plan to transition us away in transition, in him into full ownership. Right. But we usually work together to jump start one of these wicked, hard, wicked, cool things that nobody else >> was. People hate you. At first. They love you. I would end the one >> institution and on I said, OK, we're going to a four step plan. I'm gonna bring the consultants in day one while we find Thailand internally and recruit talent External. That's kind of phases one and two in parallel. And then we're gonna train our talent as we find them, and and Glenn's team will knowledge transfer, and by face for where, Rayna. And you know, that's a model I've done successfully in several organizations. People can. I hated it first because they're not doing it themselves, but they may not have the experience and the skills, and I think as soon as you show your staff you're willing to invest in them and give them the time and exposure. The conversation changes, but it's always a little awkward. At first, I've run heavy attrition, and some organizations at first build the organizations. But the one instance that Glen was referring to, we came in there and they had a 4 1 1 2 1 12 to 15 year plan and the C I O. Looked at me, he says. I'll give you two years. I'm a bad negotiator. I got three years out of it and I got a business case approved by the CEO a week later. It was a significant size business case in five minutes. I didn't have to go back a second or third time, but we said We're gonna do it in three years. Here's how we're gonna scale an organization. We scaled more than 1000 person organization in three years of talent, but we did it in a planned way and in that particular organization, probably a year and 1/2 in, I had a global map of every data and analytics role I need and I could tell you were in the US they set and with what competitors earning what industry and where in India they set and in what industry And when we needed them. We went out and recruited, but it's time to build that. But you know, in any really period, I've worked because I've done this 20 plus years. The talent changes. The location changes someone, but it's always been a challenge to find him. >> I guess it's good to have a deadline. I guess you did not take the chief data officer role in your current position. Explain that. What's what. What's your point of view on on that role and how it's evolved and how it's maybe being used in ways that don't I >> mean, I think that a CDO, um on during the early days, there wasn't a definition of a matter of fact. Every time I get a recruiter, call me all. We have a great CDO row for first time I first thing I asked him, How would you define what you mean by CDO? Because I've never seen it defined the same way into cos it's just that way But I think that the CDO, regardless of institutions, responsibility end in to make sure there's an Indian framework from strategy execution, including all of the governance and compliance components, and that you have ownership of each piece in the organization. CDO most companies doesn't own all of that, but I think they have a responsibility and too many organizations that hasn't occurred. So you always find gaps and each organization somewhere between risk costs and value, in terms of how how they're, how the how the organization's driving data and in my current role. Like I said, I wanted to focus. We want the focus to really be on how we're enabling, and I may be enabling from a risk and compliance standpoint, Justus greatly as I'm enabling a gross perspective on the business or or cost management and cost reductions. We have been successful in several programs for self funding data programs for multi gears. By finding and costs, I've gone in tow several organizations that it had a decade of merger after merger and Data's afterthought in almost any merger. I mean, there's a Data Silas section session tomorrow. It'd be interesting to sit through that because I've found that data data is the afterthought in a lot of mergers. But yet I knew of one large health care company. They've made data core to all of their acquisitions, and they was one the first places they consolidated. And they grew faster by acquisition than any of their competitors. So I think there's a There's a way to do it correctly. But in most companies you go in, you'll find all kinds of legacy silos on duplication, and those are opportunities to, uh, to find really reduce costs and self fund. All the improvements, all the strategic programs you wanted, >> a number inferring from the Indian in the data roll overlaps or maybe better than gaps and data is that thread between cost risk. And it is >> it is. And I've been lucky in my career. I've report toe CEOs. I reported to see Yellows, and I've reported to CEO, so I've I've kind of reported in three different ways, and each of those executives really looked at it a little bit differently. Value obviously is in a CEO's office, you know, compliance. Maurizio owes office and costs was more in the c i o domain, but you know, we had to build a program looking >> at all three. >> You know, I think this topic, though, that we were just talking about how these rules are evolving. I think it's it's natural, because were about 5 2.0. to 7 years into the evolution of the CDO, it might be time for a CDO Um, and you see Maur CEOs moving away from pure policy and compliance Tomb or value enablement. It's a really hard change, and that's why you're starting to Seymour turnover of some of the studios because people who are really good CEOs at policy and risk and things like that might not be the best enablers, right? So I think it's pretty natural evolution. >> Great discussion, guys. We've got to leave it there, They say. Data is the new oil date is more valuable than oil because you could use data to reduce costs to reduce risk. The same data right toe to drive revenue, and you can't put a gallon of oil in your car and a quart of oil in the car quarter in your house of data. We think it's even more valuable. Gentlemen, thank you so much for coming on the cues. Thanks so much. Lot of fun. Thanks. Keep right, everybody. We'll be back with our next guest. You're watching the Cube from IBM CDO 2019 right back.
SUMMARY :
Someone brought to you by IBM. Here's the global leader of Big Data Analytics and IBM, and we're pleased to have Mark Clare. Well, I think it's the credit goes to some of the executives at AstraZeneca when So it sounds like driving business value is really the me and So I think that in any CDO role, you have to look at all three. I love that little presentation that you gave. However, in fact, the CEO of our client ADP said, Look, I want you to But when you see an example like that and Okay, but but But where do you start when you're trying to solve these problems? So I I look at presentations and I think, you know, what you talk about date engineering? and of the remaining 10% 90% of that fixing it where they fix it wrong and the first time so they had 1% of the what Ginny Rometty calls incumbents, call them incumbent Disruptors two years ago Well, and I'm gonna stay away from the word core cause to make core Kenan for kind of legacy Corny, but actually the court, that's what we need to think about is how to do this logically and cream or of Ah unification approach that has speed and I think it's And so if you look at how we built out all the way up today and all the convergence of all And now machine intelligence comes in that you can apply in the data causes. something that someone would say would not be possible. I would end the one I had a global map of every data and analytics role I need and I could tell you were I guess you did not take the chief and that you have ownership of each piece in the organization. a number inferring from the Indian in the data roll overlaps or maybe better domain, but you know, we had to build a program looking Um, and you see Maur CEOs moving away from pure and you can't put a gallon of oil in your car and a quart of oil in the car quarter in your house of data.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Glenn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bob Pityana | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AstraZeneca | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David Dante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mark Clare | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
99% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
70 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Glen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ginny Rometty | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Maurizio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five megabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three decades | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rayna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
U. S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
80 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thio Glenn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
a week later | DATE | 0.99+ |
Glenn Finch | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than 1000 person | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Big Data Analytics | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ADP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
7 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
each organization | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Glenn Finches | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Ivy | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
15 year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
third time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
first places | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
single warehouse | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
millions of devices | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
one instance | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
1/2 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Seymour | PERSON | 0.95+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
four step | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one simple request | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
George Gagne & Christopher McDermott, Defense POW/MIA Account Agency | AWS Public Sector Summit 2019
>> Live from Washington, DC, it's theCUBE, covering AWS Public Sector Summit. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. >> Welcome back everyone to theCUBE's live coverage of the AWS Public Sector Summit, here in our nation's capital. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, co-hosting with John Furrier. We have two guests for this segment, we have George Gagne, he is the Chief Information Officer at Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency. Welcome, George. And we have Christopher McDermott, who is the CDO of the POW/MIA Accounting Agency. Welcome, Chris. >> Thank you. >> Thank you both so much for coming on the show. >> Thank you. >> So, I want to start with you George, why don't you tell our viewers a little bit about the POW/MIA Accounting Agency. >> Sure, so the mission has been around for decades actually. In 2015, Secretary of Defense, Hagel, looked at the accounting community as a whole and for efficiency gains made decision to consolidate some of the accounting community into a single organization. And they took the former JPAC, which was a direct reporting unit to PACOM out of Hawaii, which was the operational arm of the accounting community, responsible for research, investigation, recovery and identification. They took that organization, they looked at the policy portion of the organization, which is here in Crystal City, DPMO and then they took another part of the organization, our Life Sciences Support Equipment laboratory in Dayton, Ohio, and consolidated that to make the defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency, Under the Office of Secretary Defense for Policy. So that was step one. Our mission is the fullest possible accounting of missing U.S. personnel to their families and to our nation. That's our mission, we have approximately 82,000 Americans missing from our past conflicts, our service members from World War II, Korea War, Korea, Vietnam and the Cold War. When you look at the demographics of that, we have approximately 1,600 still missing from the Vietnam conflict. We have just over a 100 still missing from the Cold War conflict. We have approximately 7,700 still missing from the Korean War and the remainder of are from World War II. So, you know, one of the challenges when our organization was first formed, was we had three different organizations all had different reporting chains, they had their own cultures, disparate cultures, disparate systems, disparate processes, and step one of that was to get everybody on the same backbone and the same network. Step two to that, was to look at all those on-prem legacy systems that we had across our environment and look at the consolidation of that. And because our organization is so geographically dispersed, I just mentioned three, we also have a laboratory in Offutt, Nebraska. We have detachments in Southeast Asia, Thailand, Vietnam, Laos, and we have a detachment in Germany. And we're highly mobile. We conduct about, this year we're planned to do 84 missions around the world, 34 countries. And those missions last 30 to 45 day increments. So highly mobile, very globally diverse organization. So when we looked at that environment obviously we knew the first step after we got everybody on one network was to look to cloud architectures and models in order to be able to communicate, coordinate, and collaborate, so we developed a case management system that consist of a business intelligence software along with some enterprise content software coupled with some forensics software for our laboratory staff that make up what we call our case management system that cloud hosted. >> So business challenges, the consolidation, the reset or set-up for the mission, but then the data types, it's a different kind of data problem to work, to achieve the outcomes you're looking for. Christopher, talk about that dynamic because, >> Sure. >> You know, there are historical different types of data. >> That's right. And a lot of our data started as IBM punchcards or it started from, you know, paper files. When I started the work, we were still looking things up on microfiche and microfilm, so we've been working on an aggressive program to get all that kind of data digitized, but then we have to make it accessible. And we had, you know as George was saying, multiple different organizations doing similar work. So you had a lot of duplication of the same information, but kept in different structures, searchable in different pathways. So we have to bring all of that together and make and make it accessible, so that the government can all be on the same page. Because again, as George said, there's a large number of cases that we potentially can work on, but we have to be able to triage that down to the ones that have the best opportunity for us to use our current methods to solve. So rather than look for all 82,000 at once, we want to be able to navigate through that data and find the cases that have the most likelihood of success. >> So where do you even begin? What's the data that you're looking at? What have you seen has had the best indicators for success, of finding those people who are prisoners of war or missing in action? >> Well, you know, for some degrees as George was saying, our missions has been going on for decades. So, you know, a lot of the files that we're working from today were created at the time of the incidents. For the Vietnam cases, we have a lot of continuity. So we're still working on the leads that the strongest out of that set. And we still send multiple teams a year into Vietnam and Laos, Cambodia. And that's where, you know, you try to build upon the previous investigations, but that's also where if those investigations were done in the '70s or the '80s we have to then surface what's actionable out of that information, which pathways have we trod that didn't pay off. So a lot of it is, What can we reanalyze today? What new techniques can we bring? Can we bring in, you know, remote sensing data? Can we bring GIS applications to analyze where's the best scenario for resolving these cases after all this time? >> I mean, it's interesting one of the things we hear from the Amazon, we've done so many interviews with Amazon executives, we've kind of know their messaging. So here's one of them, "Eliminate the undifferentiated heavy lifting." You hear that a lot right. So there might be a lot of that here and then Teresa had a slide up today talking about COBOL and mainframe, talk about punch cards >> Absolutely. >> So you have a lot of data that's different types older data. So it's a true digitization project that you got to enable as well as other complexity. >> Absolutely, when the agency was formed in 2015 we really begin the process of an information modernization effort across the organization. Because like I said, these were legacy on-prem systems that were their systems' of record that had specific ways and didn't really have the ability to share the data, collaborate, coordinate, and communicate. So, it was a heavy lift across the board getting everyone on one backbone. But then going through an agency information modernization evolution, if you will, that we're still working our way through, because we're so mobilely diversified as well, our field communications capability and reach back and into the cloud and being able to access that data from geographical locations around the world, whether it's in the Himalayas, whether it's in Vietnam, whether it's in Papua New Guinea, wherever we may be. Not just our fixed locations. >> George and Christopher, if you each could comment for our audience, I would love to get this on record as you guys are really doing a great modernization project. Talk about, if you each could talk about key learnings and it could be from scar tissue. It could be from pain and suffering to an epiphany or some breakthrough. What was some of the key learnings as you when through the modernization? Could you share some from a CIO perspective and from a CDO perspective? >> Well, I'll give you a couple takeaways of what I thought I think we did well and some areas I thought that we could have done better. And for us as we looked at building our case management system, I think step one of defining our problem statement, it was years in planning before we actually took steps to actually start building out our infrastructure in the Amazon Cloud, or our applications. But building and defining that problem statement, we took some time to really take a look at that, because of the different in cultures from the disparate organizations and our processes and so on and so forth. Defining that problem statement was critical to our success and moving forward. I'd say one of the areas that I say that we could have done better is probably associated with communication and stakeholder buy-in. Because we are so geographically dispersed and highly mobile, getting the word out to everybody and all those geographically locations and all those time zones with our workforce that's out in the field a lot at 30 to 45 days at a time, three or four missions a year, sometimes more. It certainly made it difficult to get part of that get that messaging out with some of that stakeholder buy-in. And I think probably moving forward and we still deal regarding challenges is data hygiene. And that's for us, something else we did really well was we established this CDO role within our organization, because it's no longer about the systems that are used to process and store the data. It's really about the data. And who better to know the data but our data owners, not custodians and our chief data officer and our data governance council that was established. >> Christopher you're learnings, takeaways? >> What we're trying to build upon is, you define your problem statement, but the pathway there is you have to get results in front of the end users. You have get them to the people who are doing the work, so you can keep guiding it toward the solution actually meets all the needs, as well as build something that can innovate continuously over time. Because the technology space is changing so quickly and dynamically that the more we can surface our problem set, the more help we can to help find ways to navigate through that. >> So one of the things you said is that you're using data to look at the past. Whereas, so many of the guests we're talking today and so many of the people here at this summit are talking about using data to predict the future. Are you able to look your data sets from the past and then also sort of say, And then this is how we can prevent more POW. Are you using, are you thinking at all, are you looking at the future at all with you data? >> I mean, certainly especially from our laboratory science perspective, we have have probably the most advanced human identification capability in the world. >> Right. >> And recovery. And so all of those lessons really go a long ways to what what information needs to be accessible and actionable for us to be able to, recover individuals in those circumstances and make those identifications as quickly as possible. At the same time the cases that we're working on are the hardest ones. >> Right. >> The ones that are still left. But each success that we have teaches us something that can then be applied going forward. >> What is the human side of your job? Because here you are, these two wonky data number crunchers and yet, you are these are people who died fighting for their country. How do you manage those two, really two important parts of your job and how do you think about that? >> Yeah, I will say that it does amp up the emotional quotient of our agency and everybody really feels passionately about all the work that they do. About 10 times a year our agency meets with family members of the missing at different locations around the country. And those are really powerful reminders of why we're doing this. And you do get a lot of gratitude, but at the same time each case that's waiting still that's the one that matters to them. And you see that in the passion our agency brings to the data questions and quickly they want us to progress. It's never fast enough. There's always another case to pursue. So that definitely adds a lot to it, but it is very meaningful when we can help tell that story. And even for a case where we may never have the answers, being able to say, "This is what the government knows about your case and these are efforts that have been undertaken to this point." >> The fact there's an effort going on is really a wonderful thing for everybody involved. Good outcomes coming out from that. But interesting angle as a techy, IT, former IT techy back in the day in the '80s, '90s, I can't help but marvel at your perspective on your project because you're historians in a way too. You've got type punch cards, you know you got, I never used punch cards. >> Put them in a museum. >> I was the first generation post punch cards, but you have a historical view of IT state of the art at the time of the data you're working with. You have to make that data actionable in an outcome scenario workload work-stream for today. >> Yeah, another example we have is we're reclaiming chest X-rays that they did for induction when guys were which would screen for tuberculosis when they came into service. We're able to use those X-rays now for comparison with the remains that are recovered from the field. >> So you guys are really digging into history of IT. >> Yeah. >> So I'd love to get your perspective. To me, I marvel and I've always been critical of Washington's slowness with respect to cloud, but seeing you catch up now with the tailwinds here with cloud and Amazon and now Microsoft coming in with AI. You kind of see the visibility that leads to value. As you look back at the industry of federal, state, and local governments in public over the years, what's your view of the current state of union of modernization, because it seems to be a renaissance? >> Yeah, I would say the analogy I would give you it's same as that of the industrial revolutions went through in the early 20th century, but it's more about the technology revolution that we're going through now. That's how I'd probably characterize it. If I were to look back and tell my children's children about, hey, the advent of technology and that progression of where we're at. Cloud architecture certainly take down geographical barriers that before were problems for us. Now we're able to overcome those. We can't overcome the timezone barriers, but certainly the geographical barriers of separation of an organization with cloud computing has certainly changed. >> Do you see your peers within the government sector, other agencies, kind of catching wind of this going, Wow, I could really change the game. And will it be a step function into your kind of mind as you kind of have to project kind of forward where we are. Is it going to a small improvement, a step function? What do you guys see? What's the sentiment around town? >> I'm from Hawaii, so Chris probably has a better perspective of that with some of our sister organizations here in town. But, I would say there's more and more organizations that are adopting cloud architectures. It's my understanding very few organizations now are co-located in one facility and one location, right. Take a look at telework today, cost of doing business, remote accessibility regardless of where you're at. So, I'd say it's a force multiplier by far for any line of business, whether it's public sector, federal government or whatever. It's certainly enhanced our capabilities and it's a force multiplier for us. >> And I think that's where the expectation increasingly is that the data should be available and I should be able to act on it wherever I am whenever the the opportunity arises. And that's where the more we can democratize our ability to get that data out to our partners to our teams in the field, the faster those answers can come through. And the faster we can make decisions based upon the information we have, not just the process that we follow. >> And it feeds the creativity and the work product of the actors involved. Getting the data out there versus hoarding it, wall guarding it, asylumming it. >> Right, yeah. You know, becoming the lone expert on this sack of paper in the filing cabinet, doesn't have as much power as getting that data accessible to a much broader squad and everyone can contribute. >> We're doing our part. >> That's right, it's open sourcing it right here. >> To your point, death by PowerPoint. I'm sure you've heard that before. Well business intelligence software now by the click of a button reduces the level of effort for man-power and resources to put together slide decks. Where in business intelligence software can reach out to those structured data platforms and pull out the data that you want at the click of a button and build those presentations for you on the fly. Think about, I mean, if that's our force multiplier in advances in technology of. I think the biggest thing is we understand as humans how to exploit and leverage the technologies and the capabilities. Because I still don't think we fully grasp the potential of technology and how it can be leveraged to empower us. >> That's great insight and really respect what you guys do. Love your mission. Thanks for sharing. >> Yeah, thanks so much for coming on the show. >> Thank you for having us. >> I'm Rebecca Knight for John Ferrer. We will have much more coming up tomorrow on the AWS Public Sector Summit here in Washington, DC. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. of the AWS Public Sector Summit, for coming on the show. about the POW/MIA Accounting Agency. and look at the consolidation of that. the reset or set-up for the mission, You know, there are historical so that the government can in the '70s or the '80s we have to then one of the things we hear project that you got to enable and into the cloud and being as you guys are really doing and store the data. and dynamically that the more we can So one of the things you said is capability in the world. At the same time the cases But each success that we What is the human side of your job? that's the one that matters to them. back in the day in the '80s, '90s, at the time of the data recovered from the field. So you guys are really You kind of see the visibility it's same as that of the Wow, I could really change the game. a better perspective of that with some And the faster we can make decisions and the work product in the filing cabinet, That's right, it's open and pull out the data that you really respect what you guys do. for coming on the show. on the AWS Public Sector
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Christopher McDermott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George Gagne | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vietnam | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Germany | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Christopher McDermott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Christopher | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
JPAC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Teresa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hawaii | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Papua New Guinea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Washington, DC | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Crystal City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Laos | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
POW/MIA Accounting Agency | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
PACOM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
World War II. | EVENT | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Ferrer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Korean War | EVENT | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Southeast Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Hagel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
34 countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cold War | EVENT | 0.99+ |
84 missions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
early 20th century | DATE | 0.99+ |
World War II | EVENT | 0.99+ |
approximately 7,700 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Himalayas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
45 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dayton, Ohio | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Korea War | EVENT | 0.99+ |
approximately 1,600 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two important parts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each case | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
82,000 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.98+ |
approximately 82,000 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one facility | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
one network | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Vietnam | EVENT | 0.98+ |
step one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Vietnam conflict | EVENT | 0.98+ |
one location | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Step two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
AWS Public Sector Summit | EVENT | 0.97+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first generation | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
AWS | EVENT | 0.96+ |
single organization | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Offutt, Nebraska | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
Gillian Campbell & Herriot Stobo, HP | Adobe Imagine 2019
>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE covering Magento Imagine 2019, brought to you by Adobe. >> Welcome to the theCUBE, I'm Lisa Martin at The Wynn, in Las Vegas for Magento Imagine 2019. This is a three day event. You can hear a lot of exciting folks networking behind me, talking tech, talking e-commerce innovation and we're pleased to welcome fresh off the keynote stage a couple of guests from HP. We've got Gillian Campbell, the Head of Omni-channel Strategy and Operations. Gillian, thank you for joining us. >> Thank you for asking us. >> Our pleasure and Herriot Stobo, Director of Omni-channel Innovation and Solutions, also from HP. Welcome. >> Thank you very much. >> So Gillian fresh off the keynote stage, enjoyed your presentation this morning. >> Gillian: Thank you. >> Everybody I think in the world knows HP. Those of us consumers going, you know what actually, that reminds me, I need a new printer. >> We can help you. >> Thank you, excellent. Whether I'm shopping online or in a store. So you gave this really interesting keynote this morning talking about what HP is doing, starting at Apache. You really transform this shopping experience. Talk to us a little bit about HP, as I think you've mentioned it as a $50 billion start up and from a digital experience perspective, what you needed to enable. >> Yeah, so as I said, HP have been around for 80 years and in 2015, we became our own entity, HP Inc., and really started looking at how do we enable digital to be pervasive through everything that we do. Our internal processes are reached to customers and identified a great opportunity to really take leading edge and our digital commerce capabilities and we already had some early proof points and APG so we launched a global initiative and we're now on that journey to enable that best in class experience through the digital platforms. >> So Herriot talk to us about, you're based in Singapore. >> Yes. >> What were some of the market dynamics that really made it obvious that this is where we want to start building out this omni-channel strategy starting in Apache? Is it, you know whether, Gillian you mentioned it before. We started retail spaces, some being expensive. Is it more mobile experience and expectations on consumer's part? >> I think we've got a mix of different starting points across Asia. We've got some mega cities like Hong Kong and Singapore rising, Tokyo. And then we've got you know emerging markets across South-East Asia. We don't necessarily have any single market place that controls the entire market as we might see in other regions and so we've had a lot of runway to go and experiment and try new things. We also have an ecosystem of branded retail in Asia. Not in all markets, predominantly in India but also in some markets in South-East Asia that allow us to really blend the experience across both offline and online and to give customers choice at the end of the day. Let them decide how they want to shop and interact with our brand. So we have been running Magento 1 since we first launched our online store businesses in Indonesia and Thailand about six years ago and then we moved into China, replatformed, lexi-platform onto Magento 1 and then that was really the foundation of what we decided to go and build upon to become a global program. so we already had some proof points under our belt with Magento so. >> And what were some of those early wins that really started to make this really obvious that this omni-channel experience, the ability to give customers choice? Whether they want to start the process online, finish it in store, vice verse, or at least have the opportunity to have a choice? What were some of those early wins and business outcomes that you started to see? >> I think even just from because we're all, customers are people. Whether you're a corporate customer, a small business, or a consumer, we're all people and we all know that we shop that way. So essentially the storyline on that back to HP was we have to enable experiences that we would want to experience as well and it was quite a shift for a tech company who were really all about the products to be thinking about, well, how do we really enable that end to end experience? And as Herriot said, the runway was open. We already had some proof points. I was new in the job so I was like all listening to, you know, what the team were telling me. We have a great opportunity here and took that formered as a new concept for the company. We got funding approval and you know the rest is the history and the journey that we're on. So I think it was just taking a different perspective and a different approach and working with a team who already had the, built some of that credibility and others proof points with the earlier deployments and I think we kind of took a risk at the time when we started the engagement with Magento. They weren't in that leadership quadrant and we took a risk to say, let's partner with an energizing company and do something a little bit different and we're still here working towards it so I think that for me was the breakthrough, was just having the tenacity to say, we're gonna drive this path forward. It may not be how we would have done things in the past, but we're a different company now. and we had much more thinner air cover to be able to do that. >> Little bit more agility and flexibility. >> Yeah, absolutely. So you guys, you talked about, Gillian about all the buyers. We are the consumers and we have this expectation, growing expectation that I want to be able to get any and transact anything that I want to buy, whether I'm a procuring person for a company and I'm traveling but I need to approve expenses or I'm a salesperson maybe sitting next to a medium-small business customer. I need to have the option at least to have this store front. What are the things that you guys launched in Apache, leverage be the power of Magento Commerce was click to collect. So tell me a little bit about from maybe an e-commerce cultural perspective, what is it that makes people want to have the ability to start online and actually complete the transaction in a physical location? >> Essentially I was in the Advisory Board yesterday and one of the other customers of Magento said, "Until we can invent a way to touch and feel online, "there's always gonna be a need to have, "outlets where you can go touch and feel." and I think with the click and collect, some of our products are, you know, high-end PCs and gaming devices and printers that is hard to get a good appreciation of what it looks and feels like online. So if you're gonna be spending you know, a significant money you may want to go in and be able to see the colors, feel the finish. You know some of our newer products with the leather portfolios is not something you can truly appreciate without touching it. So I think we have to enable again those customers who do want to experience, feel the weight, you know feel the finish, see the color scheme 'cause its usually important, again not for all customers. Some customers are quite happy to spend thousands of dollars on an online purchase without seeing it and then making sure they have a good facility to be able to, well if they wanted to, to return if they got the normal the product. >> As we look though at like we talked about, this consumerization of everything where we have this expectation and the numbers, I think you even mentioned it maybe in your keynote, Gillian, the numbers of, or somebody did this morning, like upwards of half of all transactions are starting on mobile so we got to start there. What are some of the things that you guys have seen in region in terms of mobile conversions? >> So there's still a massive gap between desktop and mobile conversions, first of all. I mean we're not anywhere near parity between the two. But obviously we're seeing a huge volume of traffic coming in as well and it's shifting that way, so you would expect it to drop as result. I think with Magento what we've seen over the, you know, past few deployments that we've been running and that were over 8% improven. But the desktop conversions are far higher. I mean in terms of improvement and actual conversion so we've still got a long way to go. There and that's a naturative process, that's a journey that probably never ends in terms of ongoing optimization and experimentation. So yeah a lot happening there. I think just on the click and collect topic as well that you were asking about people wanting to start their journey online and then come into bricks and mortar. We're seeing a huge uptake on it just by experimenting, by piloting. Over 26% of our consumer notebooks in India that we've put onto this program were being collected in store and this is in environments which are inherently chaotic on the streets. You don't want to go out there but actually I'm passing that way anyway so it's just easier for me to pick it up on the way home and probably quicker 'cause I can collect in two hours. So it's just giving people customer choice, no additional incentive and it seems to take. So now we're expanding out regionally. >> So you said there's, this morning, Gillian, in your keynote eight markets covered, mostly Apache, but also in Latin America. >> We just started in Latin America, again, the development process is not just as simple as we're switching on. So we've been doing a lot of work for this past six months with Latin America. The team there, they're super excited to get launched. There's some differences there, we've talked about the regional variation around fulfillment models that we have to adapt towards but the intent is to get Latin America deployed, leveraging some of the layer lengths from what we've done in Asia specific and then starting to move around into more the near region and then ultimately back into the US and Canada. >> So as you look forward and of course you've mentioned we're on this journey right, what are some of the key learnings that you're going to apply? You mentioned this morning, something that was very intriguing and that was, respect the integrity of the Magento platform. Talk about that in context of some of the other learnings that you'd recommend for colleagues and similar or other industries to be able to achieve what you have on a global scale. >> I think from the outset, there was this kind of like baggage of deployments of capabilities not just in commerce but deployment of capabilities across HP that we had not respected the integrity of the platform. We had adjusted the code and developed on the code to make it HP specific and with the new HP Inc. company one of the guided principles was no, when we buy the leverage software applications respect it for what it is and adjust business processes and adjust integration rather than adjust the core so that we can get the advantage of the longer term opportunity without creating such like. So it was really just a foundational, you know, let's not go in here with a mindset that we know better than the core. The core is there for a reason and then build around that and ensure the integration and I think you know with Herriot's leadership, we've been able to you know, just keep that firm is why we can be successful and be successful longer term as well. So that all the, and one of the things we talked about yesterday also is the excellent capabilities that are coming with Adobe and the integration that we talked about the recommendation of Adobe Sensei and integrate that with Magento Core. If you don't keep to the respect the integrity, those upgrades and capabilities become really hard to take benefit of so we're really excited about, you know, again, sticking with the core and enabling and growing with the core with Magento and Adobe. >> I would just build on it, I mean I think its never gonna be easy running a global commerce platform. Single instance, multiple countries, you know, 27 markets to get started with. Who knows where we're gonna end. Its always gonna be a challenge so we have to keep it as simple as possible. These upgrades are fast and furious and that's great and we all gets lots of benefit but if we start going down our own path, we've lost it. We've lost the benefit. >> And that's one of the things too that Jason Wolfsteen said this morning was that the word Magento was gonna be enabling businesses to achieve without getting in their way and it kind of sounds Herriot, like you're saying the same thing. That we've gotta be able to respect the technologies that we're building so we don't get in our own way and we keep it simple as we wanna expand globally. Ultimately at the end of the day, you're creating these personalized experiences with consumers and that personalization is so important because it's more and more not only are we transacting or wanting to on mobile but we want our brands like HP to know us. We want you to know our brand value, you know our average order value so that we can become part of the experience but also ideally get rewarded for being loyal. >> Yeah. >> Yeah, I mean, I mean just coming to mobile again but you know, 2.3 delivers the native PWA capabilities which we're super excited to get started with. You know we've got so many used cases for this straight away, right out the box but you know we've got to do it gradually, do it the right way. I think we're also aware that we're not gonna be able to run with PWA in all markets straight away 'cause not all markets are ready for it quite frankly. User behavior- >> Is that a cultural thing? >> It's purely cultural. Maybe technical and just technical ecosystems as well. Places like China in particular, where, you know, customers use app stores but they use app stores from every single phone manufacturer right there. That's where the customer is. We can't just move away from that so we need to keep some of those legacy approaches for a little while and then yeah test in other regions and then take the learnings when we're ready to adopt it. >> Exciting so here we are at, this is the first Magento Imagine since the Adobe acquisition. Gillian, let's wrap things up with you. What are your, you mentioned you were part of the Customer Advisory Board yesterday, just some of your perspectives on this years' event now that Magento is powering the Adobe commerce cloud. >> I actually attended the Adobe Summit a few weeks ago here also in Vegas and started to see the thread of commerce coming into that conference and then seeing the Adobe, the experience, coming into Magento and I just think it's a perfect combination of opportunities especially for a company like HP where we were linked in to connect, you know, marketing and sales and support across the customer journey and the capabilities with Adobe and some of the marketing stack, and then the commerce stack, and there was support bringing that together is a super exciting opportunity for us. You know the partnership that we have with both Adobe and Magento again as one as I really, they were just starting what the next journey was gonna look like. >> We feel that about so many things, we're just starting, but Gillian, Herriot, it's been a pleasure to have you on theCUBE for Magento Imagine 2019. Thank you both for your time. >> Thank you, thank you. >> Our pleasure. I'm Lisa Martin and you're watching theCUBE live from The Wynn Las Vegas at Magento Imagine 2019. Thanks for watching. (light music)
SUMMARY :
covering Magento Imagine 2019, brought to you by Adobe. and we're pleased to welcome fresh off the keynote stage Director of Omni-channel Innovation and Solutions, So Gillian fresh off the keynote stage, Those of us consumers going, you know what actually, and from a digital experience perspective, and in 2015, we became our own entity, HP Inc., Is it, you know whether, and then we moved into China, and I think we kind of took a risk at the time We are the consumers and we have this expectation, and printers that is hard to get a good appreciation What are some of the things that you guys have seen and it's shifting that way, so you would expect it So you said there's, and then starting to move around into more the near region to be able to achieve what you have on a global scale. and I think you know with Herriot's leadership, and that's great and we all gets lots of benefit and we keep it simple as we wanna expand globally. but you know, 2.3 delivers the native PWA capabilities We can't just move away from that so we need to keep now that Magento is powering the Adobe commerce cloud. and the capabilities with Adobe to have you on theCUBE for Magento Imagine 2019. I'm Lisa Martin and you're watching theCUBE
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Gillian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Indonesia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jason Wolfsteen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gillian Campbell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Herriot Stobo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Hong Kong | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Adobe | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$50 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Magento | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Latin America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Herriot | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tokyo | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
27 markets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Apache | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
South-East Asia | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Magento 1 | TITLE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
PWA | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Adobe Summit | EVENT | 0.98+ |
thousands of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 8% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Single | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Over 26% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
HP Inc. | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Omni-channel Innovation | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Magento | TITLE | 0.95+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.94+ |
Hartej Sawhney, Hosho | HoshoCon 2018
>> From the Hard Rock Hotel in Las Vegas, it's theCUBE covering HoshoCon 2018. Brought to you by Hosho. >> Okay, welcome back everyone. It's theCUBE live coverage here in Las Vegas for the first annual blockchain security conference. The brightest minds in the industry coming together, it's called HoshoCon, and it's presented by, and sponsored by Hosho. But it's not their event, it's an industry event. And we're here with the co-founder and president, Hartej Sawhney, who is theCUBE alumni. Great to see you. You guys are doing a great event. Thanks for coming on. >> Yeah, it's always good to see you, and I'm so glad theCUBE is here at HoshoCon. >> So you've talked with us many times, but recently in Toronto about this event. This is not your company's event. You guys are putting it together. You're holding it because there's no other conferences that do this, but it's not just you guys. You guys are bringing the industry brains together. >> Yeah, I mean, we see ourselves as being on the intersection of cybersecurity and blockchain. And (coughs) just getting over a cold, but not a lot of conferences are out there that have a open discussion about cyber security in the blockchain industry. And hundreds of millions of dollars are stolen from exchanges. And 10% of all the money in the ICO space has been lost or stolen. And there's simply not enough platforms for this to be discussed. So, we figured we'd start the first conference that solely focuses on being a blockchain security conference. We chose not to have any ICO pitch competition. And it feels like there's more and more typical blockchain conferences out there, but it's important to be home base for anyone who wants to affiliate themselves with cyber security and the blockchain industry. >> And the depth and breadth of security is changing. We are hearing talks with, unfortunately I won't be able to attend the sessions, we're interviewing people all day, but amazing talks. How to hack an exchange, all these new surface areas. I mean, people kind of generally know they're unsecure, but this growth going on. There's new things happening. This is exposing some of the security vulnerabilities. What is the hot topics in the talk tracks here at HoshoCon? >> We have Anand Prakash, who runs a company called AppSecure. He's one of the worlds best white hat hackers. Who has hacked into the likes of Linkedin, Facebook, Google, all the top names. And to have someone walk us through today, Anand Prakash said, "Here's how you hack into a crypto "currency exchange and here's how they actually did it." And to have a white hat hacker walk us through that, it opens up our eye balls as to how easy it actually was for a Japanese exchange to loose 500 million dollars. That's no small sum of money. And this industry is only going to survive if we together as a community come together and evaluate how was it that 500 million dollars got stolen? And how can we as a community of global lovers of bitcoin make sure that this does not happen moving forward? >> On that exchange hack, 500 million dollars in Japan, was that white hat done or was that black hat? >> It was black hat. Unfortunately the money's not been given back. >> So it's not given back. So that's a half a billion dollars? >> It's half a billion dollars stolen, yeah you know. How many industries are worth just about that much? >> Yes, you could feed a couple countries. This is legit, right? Obviously it's like total, you know, wild west if you want to call it. Stage coach robberies they got the mask on. No one knows who it is. This is real, this is absolutely real. What are you guys doing as an industry? What's happening here to prevent this? What are the key, you know hygiene or social, anti-social engineering? What are the key things that are going on that are solving this problem? >> So, every exchange needs to value security and get a penetration test. Every company needs to make sure that somebody at their company is in charge of their in house security practices. Most companies when you ask them, "Who's in charge of security?" They point their finger at the CTO. The CTO is in charge of architecting the software. You need to have somebody full time, in house taking care of the security. Ideally a CISO and if you can afford it, pay someone five to ten thousand dollars a month as a consultant to come in for a couple of months and take care of your in house security. These are basic things that, you know, surprisingly most bitcoin exchanges often times when they're hacked, they're hacked by a basic phishing attack. That one of your employees opened up the wrong email. They opened up a PDF and the hacker gained access to your computer and is now monitoring your keyboard strokes and stole millions of dollars. Or the exchange didn't get an actual penetration test of their exchange. Or exchanges are listing contracts that have not gone through a professional smart contract audit. These things are now, also we're seeing them service in regulation with central governments. And it seems that all the smaller island nations are spearheading the way in terms of writing clarity on regulation. In Malta, Bermuda, Gibraltar, all of them are trying to spearhead the way. I'm much more excited, to be honest, about some of the larger nations bringing clarity on regulation in the next two to three years. We all can't just move to a small island off the coast of Italy that is infamous for actually laundering money in the gaming space. Yes, now they're trying to bring clean clarity doing KYC and AML in Malta and write a actual regulation about security. And if you're domiciled in Malta and you're a exchange then you can only list a token that's been audited. It's wonderful but at the end of the day Malta is also a part of the EU and if the EU changes their mind, things can change Malta. I just feel like it shows the immaturity of the space. If very legitimate companies are all going to flee to small countries like Malta or to islands like Bermuda. Good on those island nations for being so pragmatic and forward thinking and for bringing legal clarity. I mean if I was in an exchange today, arguably yes you have to go to Malta if you want clarity on regulation and you don't want to be in the United States. Right now, Malta is your choice. I'm just personally a little bit much more excited about the next three years where, I make a joke to my co-founder and I say, "The suits are coming." That we look around these conferences and you don't see that many suits but the fortunate 500, many of them are either writing private blockchains, they're evaluating how they're going to leverage blockchain technology in their major businesses and they're going to leverage decentralized applications and tokenization for already running products that have millions of customers, that are already profitable and then when they get tokenized they're going to be up and running right away. So the next two to three years are going to be very interesting. From Hosho's perspective we've taken a big turn towards catering towards more publicly traded large sophisticated companies. We've partnered up with Telefonica. Telefonica is a Fortune 200 company. Its wonderful to be able to leverage that kind of a brand. To deal with major world wide entities that are publicly traded come to Telefonica and evaluate how they can leverage blockchain technology and get one bundled security package that includes Hosho, Rivets, and Telefonica. >> Yeah the Rivets solution is interesting. It's a hardware based solution. So the subscriber of the phone becomes the entity. It's really interesting and I think this points to new paradigms of security, which I want to get to in a second but I want to just unpack what you said about the small country, big country dynamic. Great for the small countries to be opportunistic. To be creative and capture this opportunity. But people want stability. They want clarity on regulations, yes, but also standards, technical standards. >> We can't all just move to the small country of Malta. >> Yeah I'll be in a plane the whole time. >> It just doesn't work. >> Yeah and by the way the game changes too. Whats the implications of say, Malta decides one day, "You know what?" "We're getting out, we're changing things." A company would have to move their domicile again. So it's a moving train, you don't know what you're going to get. It might be stable now but it's not a scalable opportunity. >> Yeah, people have families and they want to stay where they are. Simple as that. We have large countries that have a strong crypto community that's growing and let's see how they pan out. Singapore seems like a likely next candidate. You have Korea. I would argue to say that the worlds first decentralized application that will be massively adopted will be in Korea. Korea is going to be the place where we have the worlds first decentralized application launched with mass adoption, a paradigm shift. The kind of shift where you forgot what it was like before you used Gmail regularly. >> Yeah, total, total infrastructure change. Alright so I got to ask you the hallway conversation question. Obviously you're very popular here. It's you event, you're sponsoring with the community. I see you talking to a lot of people at the VIP dinner last night. What are some of the hallway conversations that you're having? A lot of interesting people here from diverse backgrounds, in security, technology, some policy, some regulatory, some business, and legal, but really bright minds. What's the hallway conversation like? What are you talking about? >> We're talking about how all of us are going to survive crypto winter that we just entered. We've entered a time where fund raising has become extremely difficult. A lot of funds are simply bleeding. They lost a lot of money and they're not cutting checks right now. So the companies that are going to survive and stick around through this crypto winter, they're making a strong statement and they're going to be the ones that are going to stick around. And a lot of them are here at this conference at HoshoCon. And it amazing to have discussions to see what are the problems that fellow founders are facing? Building companies that will survive this crypto winter. Another thing has been just what are we going to do as a community to self-regulate? Are we going to create self-regulatory organizations? Are we going to let another Moody's get created? What is our viewpoint on regulation in the space overall, right? We love Max Keiser. His viewpoint on regulation is very extreme where he believes bitcoin is a self-regulatory technology. And on the other hand we have people saying, "No, we need to quickly move to regulate the space. "Work with central banks, work with central governments, "and write out the regulations." That's been lot of the hallway conversation. And a lot of other ones that have been really intriguing to me has been people talking about what are things that they have done within their company to protect their employees. Because the reality is in the crypto currency space every single employee of a major company in this industry is a target by naturally being in this industry. And this includes you. We are all naturally targets. And it's not about how much bitcoin you have maybe its about how much bitcoin someone thinks you have. And all of a sudden you become a target. And we need to think about things like our physical security. So some of the more interesting conversations I've been having with people have been around, along the lines of what are you doing to protect you and your family in regards to your physical security? On top of that your online presences. >> So ransoms, people getting kidnapped and or extorted. These kinds of physical pressures? >> Yeah, like ShapeShift has a lot of great stories. Michael Perklin from, the CIS of ShapeShift is here. You should totally talk to him and get him on theCUBE. Michael Perklin has a long list of war stories that ShapeShift has been through. Some of them they went through before he was actually hired as a CISO. And ShapeShift would've also not been hacked of millions of dollars if they had brought on a CISO earlier such as Michael Perklin. I believe they had hired him as a consultant. Did not renew the contract, got hacked, and brought him on as CISO. And he was like, "If you had continued working with me "I would of, this would of been avoided." And that's really-- >> It's foolish. >> One other thing I've seen with ShapeShift actually is online you'll notice that all the employees of ShapeShift, their last names are not online. So on the website it says, their chief marketing officers name is Emily, it says "Emily Shape Shift". And their badges at conferences also says "Emily Shape Shift". These are interesting things to learn from other companies that this is what you're doing to protect your employees from them being hacked. It's very interesting for us to all exchange notes-- >> Shoot I'm out there, (mumbles) everywhere pretty much online. >> Well I'm out there as well. We just got to protect ourselves and we got to think about things like our physical security. People feel uncomfortable thinking about their physical security. They think that, "Oh no we're in America, "we'll just call the cops." What about when we travel? What about when you and I are in a village in Thailand hanging out? We are microorganisms and when microorganisms are hungry they'll do what ever it takes to eat. So if they smell abundance, you and I are in trouble. >> Yeah, we got to be careful. And this is something that you really got to worry about because there's been tons of war stories. Now ultimately when you get back down to the wallet, it's one of the things we've been talking a lot this morning on, with Rivets, was on about the notion of how hard it is for mainstream to use tokens. Where's my private key? This has always been the crypto problem, even with private key encryption. >> Yeah, or should we build a multi-sig wallet to store your tokens in a secure manner? People have been asking us for a long time, Crypto funds, ICO's, "How do we store our tokens!" And our problem was that A, we've either hacked into the other wallets that are available and we saw that they're insecure or the UI and UX completely sucks. So we said lets build our own and so we built our own. >> Are you open sourcing that, is that-- >> No, we're going to be, this is going to be a unique multi-sig wallet that we release, it's not. You're open sourcing the actual code of the wallet or else it's not going to be considered legitimate. >> Yeah, it's good, it's a goldmine. >> It's a profitable venture. >> And that's going to be 100% bullet proof? >> It's going to be very secure. >> Let's talk about Meadow Suite. >> So, we came to a point where our engineers needed better tooling to find security vulnerabilities in smart contracts. And what is available, Truffle, is weak and slow. And so we built Meadow Suite. We built in a long list of tools and a full suite of tooling that we believe are going to be used by a long list of people that are building on the Ethereum blockchain. Including a lot of our competitors. And so we've open sourced it and we're excited for people to check out Meadow Suite. It's on GitHub and our engineers have put a lot of time and effort into it. We even have our own logo for it. >> And the goal is to automate things, make it easier? What's the main, main initial goals? >> I would say, long story short, is to find security vulnerabilities in smart contracts and to build tooling around that. And to effectively build and find vulnerabilities in smart contracts. >> So they build it into their development process natively? >> Correct. >> Alright Hartej great to have you on and hey congratulations for putting on this event. I know we've talked about >> Awesome to be here. it in the past, it actually happened. It's the first inaugural one. >> We had this vision and I'm glad it came through. We had a great global events team. Gabriel Shepherd, and Ryan Shewchuk, and Brad Horspool, and Michelle Yon. And like they've put on conference's the size of Southwest by Southwest. And our vision is, look we're not in the events business. And we're a cyber security business at the end of the day. But we found it necessary that there has to be a conference where there's a platform for people to talk about cyber security intersecting with the blockchain industry. There's got to be a platform for someone to get on stage and say, "Hey here's lessons that "we learned from getting hacked" And if this industry is going to survive, this topic needs to survive. And the brands that want to affiliate themselves with blockchain security and that want to be apart of the discussion. This will be a go to conference every single year. We're going to keep doing it and I look forward to having you at every single one, coming. >> It's been great. And you know what's key is having reputable people working together in a community, building an open community, sharing data, sharing best practices, and having candid conversations. >> Yep, it's the only way to get someone as epic as Andreas Antonopoulos to your conference. I mean my co-founder and I have been looking up to Andreas for so long. Watching videos of Andreas. Watching videos of Max Keiser, Stacy Herbert. To have them here is really just truly remarkable and I'm grateful, I'm honored, I'm touched. I'm touched to have you here. I miss David Vellante, I wish he was here. >> He's in San Francisco, he says hi. He was going to fly in tonight but-- >> He texted me. >> He did, okay. >> Hartej it's great to see you. >> Great to see you >> Congratulations. as well. thank you. >> Great event. Okay we're here live with theCUBe coverage for HoshoCon 2018, the first inaugural security conference on blockchain. Industry leaders coming together. The brilliant, bright minds of the industry working out the solutions, trying to pedal faster. Better security, check it out HoshoCon.com. I'm John Furrier stay with us for more coverage after this short break. (techno music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Hosho. Great to see you. Yeah, it's always good to see you, You guys are bringing the industry brains together. And 10% of all the money in the And the depth and breadth of security is changing. And this industry is only going to survive Unfortunately the money's not been given back. So it's not given back. It's half a billion dollars stolen, yeah you know. What are the key, you know hygiene or And it seems that all the smaller island nations Great for the small countries to be opportunistic. Yeah and by the way the game changes too. Korea is going to be the place where we have the worlds Alright so I got to ask you the So the companies that are going to survive These kinds of physical pressures? And he was like, "If you had continued working with me So on the website it says, their chief marketing Shoot I'm out there, (mumbles) We just got to protect ourselves And this is something that you really got to worry about into the other wallets that are available You're open sourcing the actual code of the wallet that are building on the Ethereum blockchain. And to effectively build and find Alright Hartej great to have you on It's the first inaugural one. And if this industry is going to survive, And you know what's key is having Yep, it's the only way to get someone as epic as He was going to fly in tonight but-- as well. The brilliant, bright minds of the industry working out
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Telefonica | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Hartej Sawhney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stacy Herbert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Max Keiser | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michelle Yon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gabriel Shepherd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ryan Shewchuk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Malta | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Brad Horspool | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bermuda | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Perklin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Toronto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
EU | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
500 million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rivets | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andreas Antonopoulos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Anand Prakash | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ShapeShift | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hosho | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
half a billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Italy | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Gibraltar | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
HoshoCon | EVENT | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gmail | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Emily | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
tonight | DATE | 0.99+ |
AppSecure | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Andreas | PERSON | 0.98+ |
hundreds of millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first conference | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Japanese | OTHER | 0.98+ |
Meadow Suite | TITLE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Hard Rock Hotel | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Hartej | PERSON | 0.98+ |
last night | DATE | 0.98+ |
HoshoCon 2018 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
millions of customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Korea | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Southwest | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
AML | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
GitHub | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Moody's | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
first decentralized application | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Hartej Sawhney, Hosho | Blockchain Futurist Conference 2018
>> Live, from Toronto Canada, it's the CUBE! Covering Blockchain Futurist Conference 2018. Brought to you by the CUBE. >> Hello everyone and welcome back. This is the CUBE's exclusive coverage here in Toronto for the Blockchain Futurist Conference, we're here all week. Yesterday we were at the Global Cloud and Blockchain Summit put on by DigitalBits and the community, here is the big show around thought leadership around the future of blockchain and where it's going. Certainly token economics is the hottest thing with blockchain, although the markets are down the market is not down when it comes to building things. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante, here with CUBE alumni and special guest Hartej Sawhney who is the founder of Hosho doing a lot of work on security space and they have a conference coming up that the CUBE will be broadcasting live at, HoshoCon this coming fall, it's in October I believe, welcome to the CUBE. >> Thank you so much for having me. >> Always great to see you man. >> What's the date of the event, real quick, what's the date on your event? >> It's October 9th to the 11th, Hard Rock Hotel & Casino, we rented out the entire property, we want everyone only to bump into the people that we're inviting and they're coming. And the focus is blockchain security. We attend over 130 conferences a year, and there's never enough conversation about blockchain security, so we figured, y'know, Defcon is still pure cybersecurity, Devcon from Ethereum is more for Ethereum developers only, and every other conference is more of a traditional blockchain conference with ICO pitch competitions. We figured we're not going to do that, and we're going to try to combine the worlds, a Defcon meets Devcon vibe, and have hackers welcome, have white hat hackers host a bug bounty, invite bright minds in the space like Max Keiser and Stacy Herbert, the founder of the Trezor wallet, RSA, y'know we've even invited everyone from our competitors to everyone in the media, to everyone that are leading the blockchain whole space. >> That's the way to run an event with community, congratulations. Mark your calendar we've got HoshoCon coming up in October. Hartej, I want to ask you, I know Dave wants to ask you your trip around the world kind of questions, but I want to get your take on something we're seeing emerging, and I know you've been talking about, I want to get your thoughts and reaction and vision on: we're starting to see the world, the losers go out of the market, and certainly prices are down on the coins, and the coins are a lot of tokens out there, >> Too many damn tokens! (laughing) >> The losers are the only ones who borrowed money to buy bitcoin. >> (laughs) Someone shorted bitcoin. >> That's it. >> But there's now an emphasis on builders and there's always been an entrepreneurial market here, alpha entrepreneurs are coming into the space you're starting to see engineers really building great stuff, there's an emphasis on builders, not just the quick hit ponies. >> Yep. >> So your thoughts on that trend. >> It's during the down-market that you can really focus on building real businesses that solve problems, that have some sort of foresight into how they're going to make real money with a product that's built and tested, and maybe even enterprise grade. And I also think that the future of fundraising is going to be security tokens, and we don't really have a viable security exchange available yet, but giving away actual equity in your business through a security token is something very exciting for sophisticated investors to participate in this future tokenized economy. >> But you're talking about real equity, not just percentage of coin. >> Yeah, y'know, actual equity in the business, but in the form of a security token. I think that's the future of fundraising to some extent. >> Is that a dual sort of vector, two vectors there, one is the value of the token itself and the equity that you get, right? >> Correct, I mean you're basically getting equity in the company, securitized in token form, and then maybe a platform like Securitize or Polymath, the security exchanges that are coming out, will list them. And so I think during the down-markets, when prices are down, again I said before the joke but it's also the truth: the only people losing in this market are the ones who borrowed to buy bitcoin. The people who believe in the technology remain to ignore the price more or less. And if you're focused on building a company this is the time to focus on building a real business. A lot of times in an up-market you think you see a business opportunity just because of the amount of money surely available to be thrown at any project, you can ICO just about any idea and get a couple a million dollars to work on it, not as easy during a down-market so you're starting to take a step back, and ask yourself questions like how do we hit $20,000 of monthly recurring revenue? And that shouldn't be such a crazy thing to ask. When you go to Silicon Valley, unless you're two-time exited, or went to Stanford, or you were an early employee at Facebook, you're not getting your first million dollar check for 15 or 20 percent of your business, even, until you make 20, 25K monthly recurring revenue. I say this on stage at a lot of my keynotes, and I feel like some people glaze their eyes over like, "obviously I know that", the majority are running an ICO where they are nowhere close to making 20K monthly recurring and when you say what's your project they go, "well, our latest traction is that we've closed about "1.5 million in our private pre-sale." That's not traction, you don't have a product built. You raised money. >> And that's a dotcom bubble dynamic where the milestone of fundraising was the traction and that really had nothing to do with building a viable business. And the benefit of blockchain is to do things differently, but achieve the same outcome, either more efficient or faster, in a new way, whether it's starting a company or achieving success. >> Yep, but at the same time, blockchain technology is relatively immature for some products to go, at least for the Fortune 500 today, for them to take a blockchain product out of R&D to the mainstream isn't going to happen right now. Right now the Fortune 500 is investing into blockchain tech but it's in R&D, and they're quickly training their employees to understand what is a smart contract?, who is Nick Szabo?, when did he come up with this word smart contracts? I was just privy to seeing some training information for multiple Fortune 500 companies training their employees on what are smart contracts. Stuff that we read four or five years ago from Nick Szabo's essays is now hitting what I would consider the mainstream, which is mid-level talent, VP-level talent at Fortune 500 companies, who know that this is the next wave. And so when we're thinking about fundraising it's the companies who raise enough money are going to be able to survive the storm, right? In this down-market, if you raised enough money in your ICO, for this vision that you have that's going to be revolutionary, a lot of times I read an ICO's white paper and all I can think is well I hope this happens, because if it does that's crazy. But the question is, did they raise enough money to survive? So that's kind of another reason why people are raising more money than they need. Do people need $100 million to do the project? I don't know. >> It's an arm's race. >> But they need to last 10 years to make this vision come true. >> Hey, so, I want to ask you about your whirlwind tour. And I want to ask in the context of something we've talked about before. You've mentioned on the CUBE that Solidity, very complex, there's a lot of bugs and a lot of security flaws as a result in some of the code. A lot of the code. You're seeing people now try to develop tooling to open up blockchain development to Java programmers, for example, which probably exacerbates the problem. So, in that context, what are you seeing around the world, what are you seeing in terms of the awareness of that problem, and how are you helping solve it? >> So, starting with Fortune 500 companies, they have floors on floors around the world full of Java engineers. Full Stack Engineers who, of course, know Java, they know C#, and they're prepared to build in this language. And so this is why I think IBM's Hyperledger went in that direction. This is why even some people have taken the Ethereum virtual machine and tried to completely rebuild it and rewrite it into functional programming languages like Clojure and Scala. Just so it's more accessible and you can do more with the functional programming language. Very few lines of code are equivalent to hundreds of lines of code in linear languages, and in functional programming languages things are concurrent and linear and you're able to build large-scale enterprise-grade solutions with very small lines of code. So I'm personally excited, I think, about seeing different types of blockchains cater more towards Fortune 500 companies being able to take advantage, right off the bat, of rooms full of Java engineers. The turn to teaching of Solidity, it's been difficult, at least from the cybersecurity perspective we're not looking for someone who's a software engineer who can teach themselves Solidity really fast. We're looking for a cybersecurity, QA-minded, quality-assurance mindset, someone who has an OPSEC mindset to learn Solidity and then audit code with the cybersecurity mindset. And we've found that to be easier than an engineer who knows Java to learn Solidity. Education is hard, we have a global shortage of qualified engineers in this space. >> So cybersecurity is a good cross-over bridge to Solidity. Skills matters. >> If you're in cybersecurity and you're a full sec engineer you can learn just about any language like anyone else. >> The key is to start at the core. >> The key is to have a QA mindset, to have the mindset of actually doing quality assurance, on code and finding vulnerabilities. >> Not as an afterthought, but as a fundamental component of the development process. >> I could be a good engineer and make an app like Angry Birds, upload it, and even before uploading it I'll get it audited by some third party professional, and once it's uploaded I can fix the bugs as we go and release another version. Most smart contracts that have money behind them are written to be irreversible. So if they get hacked, money gets stolen. >> Yeah, that's real. >> And so the mindset is shifting because of this space. >> Alright, so on your tour, paint a picture, what did you see? >> First of all, how many cities, how long? Give us the stats. >> I just did about 80 days and I hit 10 countries. Most of it was between Europe and Asia. I'll start with saying that, right now, there's a race amongst smaller nations, like Malta, Bermuda, Belarus, Panama, the island nations, where they're racing to say that "we have clarity on regulation when it comes to "the blockchain cryptocurrency industries," and this is a big deal, I'd say, mainly for cryptocurrency exchanges, that are fleeing and navigating global regulation. Like in India, Unocoin's bank has been shutdown by the RBI. And they're going up against the RBI and the central government of India because, as an exchange, their banks have been shut down. And they're being forced to navigate waters and unique waves around the world globally. You have people like the world's biggest exchange, at least by volume today is Binance. Binance has relocated 100 people to the island of Malta. For a small island nation that's still technically a part of the European Union, they've made significant progress on bringing clarity on what is legal and what is not, eventually they're saying they want to have a crypto-bank, they want to help you go from IPO to ICO from the Maltese stock exchange. Similarly also Gibraltar, and there's a law firm out there, Hassans, which is like the best law firm in Gibraltar, and they have really led the way on helping the regulators in Gibraltar bring clarity. Both Gibraltar and Malta, what's similar between them is they've been home to online gambling companies. So a lot of online casinos have been in both of their markets. >> They understand. >> They've been very innovative, in many different ways. And so even conversations with the regulators in both Malta and Gibraltar, you can hear their maturity, they understand what a smart contract is. They understand how important it is to have a smart contract audited. They already understand that every exchange in their jurisdiction has to go through regular penetration testing. That if this exchange changes its code that the code opens it up to vulnerabilities, and is the exchange going through penetration testing? So the smaller nations are moving fast. >> But they're operationalizing it faster, and it's the opportunity for them is the upside. >> My only fear is that they're still small nations, and maybe not what they want to hear but it's the truth. Operating in larger nations like the United States, Canada, Germany, even Japan, Korea, we need to see clarity in much larger nations and I think that's something that's exciting that's going to happen possibly after we have the blueprint laid out by places like Malta and Gibraltar and Bermuda. >> And what's the Wild West look like, or Wild East if you will in Asia, a lot of activity, it's a free-for-all, but there's so much energy both on the money-making side and on the capital formation side and the entrepreneurial side. Lay that out, what's that look like? >> By far the most exciting thing in Asia was Korea, Seoul, out of all the Asian tiger countries today, in August 2018, Seoul, Korea has a lot of blockchain action going on right now. It feels like you're in the future, there's actually physical buildings that say Blockchain Academy, and Blockchain Building and Bitcoin Labs, you feel like you're in 2028! (laughs) And today it's 2018. You have a lot of syndication going on, some of it illegal, it's illegal if you give a guarantee to the investor you're going to see some sort of return, as a guarantee. It's not illegal if you're putting together accredited investors who are willing to do KYC and AML and be interested in investing a couple of hundred ETH in a project. So, I would say today a lot of ICOs are flocking to Korea to do a quick fundraising round because a lot of successful syndication is happening there. Second to Korea, I would say, is a battle between Singapore and Hong Kong. They're both very interesting, It's the one place where you can find people who speak English, but also all four of the languages of the tiger nations: Japanese, Mandarin, Cantonese, Korean, all in one place in Hong Kong and Singapore. But Singapore, you still can't get a bank account as an ICO. So they're bringing clarity on regulation and saying you can come here and you can get a lawyer and you can incorporate, but an ICO still has trouble getting a bank account. Hong Kong is simply closer in proximity to China, and China has a lot of ICOs that cannot raise money from Chinese citizens. So they can raise from anybody that's not Chinese, and they don't even have a white paper, a website, or even anybody in-house that can speak English. So they're lacking English materials, English websites, and people in their company that can communicate with the rest of the world in other languages other than Mandarin or Cantonese. And that's a problem that can be solved and bridges need to be built. People are looking in China for people to build that bridge, there's a lot of action going on in Hong Kong for that reason since even though technically it's a part of China it's still not a part of China, it's a tricky gray line. >> Right, in Japan a lot going on but it's still, it's Japan, it's kind of insulated. >> The Japanese government hasn't provided clarity on regulation yet. Just like in India we're waiting for September 11th for some clarity on regulation, same way in Japan, I don't know the exact date but we don't have enough clarity on regulation. I'm seeing good projects pop up in Korea, we're even doing some audits for some projects out of Japan, but we see them at other conferences outside of Japan as well. Coming up in Singapore is consensus, I'm hoping that Singapore will turn into a better place for quality conferences, but I'm not seeing a lot of quality action out of Singapore itself. Y'know, who's based in Singapore? Lots of family funds, lots of new exchanges, lots of big crypto advisory funds have offices there, but core ICOs, there was still a higher number of them in Korea, even in Japan, even. I'm not sure about the comparison between Japan and Singapore, but there is definitely a lot more in Korea. >> What about Switzerland, do you have any visibility there? Did you visit Switzerland? >> I was Zug, I was in Crypto Valley, visited Crypto Valley labs... >> What feels best for you? >> I don't know, Mother Earth! (laughs) >> All of the above. >> The point of bitcoin is for us to start being able to treat this earth as one, and as you navigate through the crypto circuit one thing as that is becoming more visible is the power of China partnering up with the Middle East and building a One Belt, One Road initiative. I feel like One Belt, One Road ties right into the future of crypto, and it's opening up the power of markets like the Philippines, Thailand, Malaysia, Singapore. >> What Gabriel's doing in the Caribbean with Barbados. >> Gabriel from Bit, yeah. >> Yeah, Bit, he's bringing them all together. >> Yeah, I mean the island nations are open arms to companies, and I think they will attract a lot of American companies for sure. >> So you're seeing certainly more, in some pockets, more advanced regulatory climates, outside of the United States, and the talent pool is substantial. >> So then, when it comes to talent pools, I believe it was in global commits for the language of Python, China is just on the verge of surpassing the United States, and there's a lot of just global breakthroughs happening, there's a large number of Full Stack engineers at a very high level in countries like China, India, Ukraine. These are three countries that I think are outliers in that a Full Stack Engineer, at the highest level in a country like India or Ukraine for example, would cost a company between $2,000 to $5,000 a month, to employ full time, in a country where they likely won't take stock to work for your company. >> Fifteen years ago those countries were outsource, "hey, outsource some cheap labor," no, now they're product teams or engineers, they're really building value. >> They're building their own things, in-house. >> And the power of new markets are opening up as you said, this is huge, huge. OK, Hartej, thanks so much for coming on, I know you got to go, you got your event October 9th to 11th in Las Vegas, Blockchain Security Conference. >> The CUBE will be there. >> I look forward to having you there. >> You guys are the leader in Blockchain security, congratulations, hosho.io, check it out. Hosho.io, October 9th, mark your calendars. The CUBE, we are live here in Toronto, for the Blockchain Futurist Conference, with our good friend, CUBE alumni Hartej. I'm John Furrier, Dave Vellante, be right back with more live coverage from the Untraceable event here in Toronto, after this short break.
SUMMARY :
Live, from Toronto Canada, it's the CUBE! that the CUBE will be broadcasting live at, And the focus is blockchain security. and the coins are a lot of tokens out there, The losers are the only ones who not just the quick hit ponies. It's during the down-market that you can really focus on But you're talking about real equity, but in the form of a security token. just because of the amount of money And the benefit of blockchain is to do things differently, But the question is, did they raise enough money to survive? But they need to last 10 years to and a lot of security flaws as a result in some of the code. at least from the cybersecurity perspective So cybersecurity is a good cross-over bridge to Solidity. you can learn just about any language like anyone else. The key is to have a QA mindset, of the development process. and even before uploading it I'll get it audited First of all, how many cities, how long? Like in India, Unocoin's bank has been shutdown by the RBI. and is the exchange going through penetration testing? But they're operationalizing it faster, and it's the Operating in larger nations like the United States, and the entrepreneurial side. It's the one place where you can find people Right, in Japan a lot going on but it's still, I'm not sure about the comparison between I was Zug, I was in Crypto Valley, is the power of China partnering up with the Middle East Yeah, I mean the island nations are and the talent pool is substantial. China is just on the verge of surpassing the United States, no, now they're product teams or engineers, They're building their own things, And the power of new markets for the Blockchain Futurist Conference,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stacy Herbert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hartej Sawhney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bermuda | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Korea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
August 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Max Keiser | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Switzerland | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
September 11th | DATE | 0.99+ |
$20,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hong Kong | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Gibraltar | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Hartej | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
RSA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nick Szabo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Malta | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
October 9th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Toronto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
European Union | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Binance | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gabriel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Angry Birds | TITLE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
20 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hassans | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
Unocoin | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2028 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Caribbean | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Fortune 500 | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20K | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Trezor | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Blockchain Academy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Bitcoin Labs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Panama | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Belarus | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two vectors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first million dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two-time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
RBI | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Scala | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Al Burgio, Digitalbits | Global Cloud & Blockchain Summit 2018
>> Live from Toronto, Canada, it's the theCUBE, covering Global Cloud and Blockchain Summit 2018. Brought to you by theCUBE. >> Hey, everyone. Welcome back to CUBE's coverage in Toronto for the Global Cloud and Blockchain Summit, part of the big event also happening for two days, Wednesday and Thursday, the Blockchain Futurist Conference, here in Canada. I'm John Furrier, Dave Vellante here. Next guest is the founder and CEO of DigitalBits.io as well as Fusechain and serial entrepreneur and also the mastermind behind this inaugural event. First time a cloud blockchain conference has come together, bringing the two communities together. Al, great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you for having me. Thank you for coming to Toronto, Canada. >> It's our pleasure. Certainly as you know, we love cloud. We cover all the big cloud shows. We're dominating that market in terms of coverage and access. And we just started covering blockchain in 2018 with theCUBE, although on SiliconANGLE since 2011 with the written word in journalism. But this is interesting. You are the brainchild behind this event, and I want you to explain why you came up with this event idea because this is the first time that you got two worlds coming together. You're bringing in the cloud DNA, and that can go back to like, classic networking and think big hosting providers, the Exodus and the Equinox of the world. These guys are the same guys who built YouTube's back end and Facebook. Large scale network guys with this new emerging blockchain world because there's some connections points, and it's super important, and no one's ever done that before. What's the motivation behind a cloud and blockchain summit? >> Well, if you think of the internet, all that data, all that traffic, substantial majority of it is flowing through data centers, infrastructure providers globally. And within many of those data centers you have cloud providers, whether it's cloud computing, SaaS, Software as a Service, cloud providers, you name it. And now we have upon us this emerging blockchain technology. Many are referring to it as Web3.0. And I'm obviously a big believer in that this is the next evolution of the internet. We got Internet1.0 in the 90's. We had Web2.0 with social sharing economy and so forth, and along the way, each step you had your first movers, your willing followers, and then the unwilling followed. It's been that powerful the last two occurrences that we saw with the evolution of the internet. Web3.0 is that next thing. First movers, willing followers, the unwilling. Every time you have this something very innovative, obviously there's a big engineering initially starts amongst, you know, a community of engineers, and then it starts to go mainstream. Obviously a lot happens in between conception and going mainstream. And if we look at the 90's, Linux played a substantial role in the acceleration of innovation. It really extracted, you know, it took a different approach to software, really leading open-source. >> It took down some proprietary incumbents - Unix. >> Absolutely, absolutely. And free and open-source software, but it still needed to be supported. Which version of Linux should enterprises embrace? And at that time, it was very important with what we saw emerge with things like Intel, IBM, Dell, HP, and so forth getting behind organizations like Red Hat and their version of Linux, now known as Red Hat Enterprise Linux. >> IBM put in a billion dollars into it. >> Yeah, exactly. >> Steve Woz, yeah. >> So with regard to that, you know, it was all about the hardware validating, right? These trusted vendors to the enterprise. And them kind of validating a company, or endorsing a company, in effect, like Red Hat, really helped provide a guiding light to the enterprise. Now it's not about hardware, it's about the cloud, right? Cloud computing providers and so forth. And in that ecosystem, it's not just AWS. It's not just Microsoft. There are many data center providers that have built a cloud computing offering that are supporting substantial financial institutions, substantial organizations within healthcare space insurance, and many, many other industries. So they play a very important role in supporting an enterprise, whether implementation, integration, and consumption of technologies, including new and emerging technologies. And so as we have, sort of, before us, this emergence of blockchain, obviously having lived in the cloud and infrastructure community for a number of years with that last company I had founded, know a lot of the key stakeholders. And even though I'm all in on blockchain, you know, I pop in every now and then in that world. What I found was two different extremes. You have CTO's and even CEO's of cloud computing organizations, and others within those organizations, totally high "Get It" factor. And you had the other extreme, multi-billion dollar cloud computing organizations, you know, data center organizations, where again, the leadership is still trying to figure it out, in some respects, not fully paying attention yet. And I saw that this is definitely emerging. Again, you'll have first movers, willing followers, and the unwilling. They're all going to get there. But it hadn't gotten there yet. And so with regards to this event, I saw a huge opportunity to really put something out there, allow it to ultimately take a life of it's own. There's a new organizer that's going to be coming forward and driving the ship with this event. But ultimately, there needed to be a forum, not just here in North America, but in every corner of the world, the Global Cloud and Blockchain Summit, providing this opportunity for that convergence, and for both communities to really share knowledge and accelerate, fill that gap. And I saw it's there. It is there. There's amazing things being spoken on stage as we sort of are sitting here, with leading innovators, and so forth, from both sides. There was an amazing keynote today by Anthony Di Iorio, one of the co-founders of Ethereum and founder and CEO of Decentral and Jaxx, really helping support the event today and making a contribution. His talk was phenomenal. That's kind of the thought behind it, and it's, you know, here we are. >> I want to pick up on something you said, for our audience, you know. I mean, for guys like you, Al, that are deep into it, you understand this very well. But you talked about Linux, and how, essentially, the Web was built on Linux. So if you were a Linux developer back in the day, and you wanted to "invest" in Linux, you didn't have a vehicle to do that. You could put your time in, you know? You could maybe join a company and maybe get some stock. But there was no way to directly invest in Linux. Well today, there is. With blockchain and cryptoeconomics, you actually can, whether it's tokenize your business or participate, you can buy tokens. And so it's a whole different incentive structure. And many in our audience are sort of new to this, kind of the unwilling, if you will. >> Yeah. >> And that's an amazing new way to create capital structures. >> And very powerful. I mean, prior to this tokenized revolution we're seeing here, it was a cool open-source project that as an engineer you wanted to be part of this, contribute your time, and quite often you would ask your employer to permit you to have 10%, 20% of your time to commit to these projects. Maybe you would even ask for that in your job interview. And you'd maybe get the thumbs up, you know? And so, your employer's, in effect, subsidizing your time to really contribute to projects and code that you're very passionate about. But if they got busy, economic cycles and what have you, and it's like, "You know what? We need you at 100% focus on your day job." All of a sudden, that community, that open-source community is losing perhaps a very valuable contributor, right? And there's really no way for that direct incentive from that project. And that's really what that is now. Projects can be created. You think of, you know, some blockchain's like an operating system, you now have an, you know, to use the Linux comparison, now let's say an operating system can have it's own incentive, a reward or compensation structure to really help attract engineers and other valuable contributors to not just give birth to a project, but help make it sustainable. >> Yeah. >> And, you know, eventually maybe you're quitting the day job because it's able to be free, open-source, and providing an enlightening self-interest. >> I'm getting some messages here, direct messages, listening to you talk. So I want to share them with you. One guy says, "Hey, Al. What's the deal with the different blockchains? How do I tell?" So I'm not an unwilling. I'm a wanna-believe. I'm not the front-end, but what do I pay attention to? And there's so many different chains. You got people promoting certain things. I don't know whose stats are real. You got two kids in a garage, >> Yeah. >> who just did an ICS. So the question is essentially what's the difference between all these chains? What do I have to look for? Is it latency? Who's solving these problems? What's the big deal, and how do I determine better chain from another chain? Are they all going to work together? >> Yeah. >> What's your thoughts? >> Things are moving incredibly fast right now. And it is difficult to keep up to speed. You know, maybe it was just bitcoin at one time and one chain to focus on. Then there was Ethereum and all these others. Now there's many, many more. So ultimately, it is about information, staying current with that information, doing your due diligence. But you really need to have a community that you're a part of, that you can, kind of, share in your evaluation and monitoring of what's new and emerging. >> So community's important. >> Very important, very important. Just say trusted advisors, trusted peers, and you kind of take a collective approach at this. Nonetheless, we're in this pioneering era, mass innovation happening. What's winning today, you know, may not necessarily be continuing to win tomorrow. But you really need to maintain a discipline, and take a peer approach to staying current. In terms of public chain, private chain, they're all going to play a role, and they are playing a role, in different use cases. There's clearly a use case for private chain within enterprise, within say, you know, trusted circle of supply chain participants. Maybe you want to bring some efficiencies to all that. >> So use case drives the chain. >> Yeah, absolutely. But public chain is a phenomenal phenomenon. Among other things that we hear a lot about it, it's given birth to the ICO. The new way of capital formation that is unbelievably awesome. The world has never seen anything like this, where. >> Explain that. Capital formation dynamic that you're referring to. >> Yeah, so the traditional way, whether it's in Silicon Valley or any other part of the world, you have an entrepreneur that maybe they haven't had a big exit where they can fund their own next venture on their own. You know. Smart intelligent people with a brilliant idea, and they're doing that friends and family route, right? The due diligence checklist isn't that long. It's like, you know what? Love my son. He's the smartest kid on the planet. You know, you give him a few dollars and a few other friends and family, this new emerging entrepreneur. And if there's evolution there, things are picking up traction and so forth, then maybe you're doing an angel round. And there's this sort of structured process that history's sort of define for us. And then from an angel round, you know, you have this early stage company emerging, and new milestones being reached, and then maybe there's a Series A venture capital round, and what have you. And then you have the, you know, the Series A, Series B, and so forth, right? The typical approach to things. A very regimented Silicon Valley has been a dominating force of the venture capital community, and that form of competition >> But the dynamics are different than the venture capital. >> Yeah, so that's the way that we've always, sort of, known, right? Many early stage companies, the process they go through. Many, many meetings behind closed doors, and so forth. >> Cloak and dagger, black box. >> Yeah, so concept of crowdsourcing, still beholden to the financial systems that're up there. How do you really foster community up there? And raise maybe a few million dollars? >> So what you're saying is is that it's easier to raise money now? Easier? >> It absolutely is. You have this new meeting of exchange where you have cryptocurrencies like Ether. And you're basically sharing your idea with the world, and all of a sudden, saying, "Hey, here's our token economics. We'd like to reach some capital." And then whether it's minutes, hours, or even weeks, you have capital coming to you from different corners of the world, and it's coming to you in seconds. Highly efficient. You have these universal currencies now emerging, and it's an amazing sensation, and it's a new form of capital formation, and with capital formation, you have innovation. So I believe that, you know, we're just going to continue to see an acceleration of innovation, globally happening, and not just in certain pockets of the world now, in many, many corners of the world. I mean what's happening in Asia's absolutely phenomenal in the blockchain space as well. It's not just interesting here in North America. In fact, in some respects even more interesting, depending on how you look at it. >> Describe what's happening in Asia. You guys talked about this last night in the fireside chat. >> Well, I mean some of the publicly available information is that you can just simply see, on many of the cryptocurrency exchanges out there, an insane amount of volume, more so than in any other corner of the world. And so you have a very active investor community up there, a trading community, token-buyer community, what have you. >> And where are the pockets? >> Very healthy. >> So it was China, and then things sort of shifted to Japan. >> Well, >> Where do you see the action? >> maybe where the centralized exchange in happening, but I think it's still a lot of the same people. It's not like it got shut down in a country, and those people just lost their desire. They just found an alternative means to continue to participate. >> Right. >> You know, South Korea, it's phenomenal. You have Hong Kong. You have Japan. You have Singapore, among many of the pockets. But then it's everywhere. I mean, you're meeting people from Vietnam, Thailand, India. They're all very active investor communities and utility token buyer communities. And it's very healthy. Yes, you have, you know, a correction every now and then in this market. But you have that with any sort of new, exciting innovation. But it continues to thrive up there. It's phenomenal. >> Yeah, you're seeing one of the main uses of bitcoin to buy alternative currencies. >> Yep. >> That's sucking huge amounts of volume. >> It's an easier currency. I mean, in a matter of seconds or minutes, you can have a currency go from a bedroom in Florida, you know, here in Toronto, to a project in Singapore, or vice versa, without going through bank. >> So again some more couple questions from the crowd. If you want to reach us, tweet us, either direct message or tweet @Furrier @DVellante. Happy to take your questions for the guest. But one says, "Do we buy now?" >> (laughs) >> Second was, "Do this side step the tariffs of the China, Japan, U.S. thing?" Obviously outside of the United States, we're the world power in the United States. But now that power is shifting. You see China and here in Canada, a lot of crypto-DNA here. So interesting. Your thoughts on buying? (chuckles) On the dip? Or crash? Or however you look at it? And then the international dynamic with China and Japan and others? >> So many are seeing it as a dip. I mean, the reality is, if this is new form of capital formation, it does share similar characteristics, nonetheless still to traditional or early-stage investing and venture capital, in many respects. Not every start-up succeeds. In fact, you know, over 90% traditionally don't make it. Even if they make it to a Series A round, they may not make it to a B round, right? And so, the fact that you have, some people kind of are referring to the Wild Wild West. I don't necessarily see it that way. It's just finding it's way, right? And it's going to get to a mature state. >> Well I think people look at the bubble, and they think Wild Wild West, but the interesting thing about it, you know, we talked about it off camera last night, around international is, and no one really knows what the STEEMs will be. This is going to be a completely different landscape than anything we've seen before, whether it's standards or execution. And I hear the argument all the time of "Oh, it's unregulated!" It's really the United States that's taking a more regulatory approach, you know, the SEC is essentially scaring straight everybody and saying, >> Well they're trying to figure it out. >> Well they're trying to figure it out, but also they've kind of slows things down, the process. But that being said, it might not have to be formally regulated. Because you mentioned Linux. The role of self-governing communities is a very interesting dynamic. No one's actually said and analyzed what a regulatory regime, globally, would look like, if you factor in, kind of, the open source concepts, with self governance because communities are very efficient, and we got money involved. >> Yeah. >> It can be even more efficient. That's called a marketplace. >> You know, people have disposable income, and they decide what they want to do with that disposable income. You go to a restaurant, you go buy some groceries, you invest, you maybe buy some commodities, right? And where we put that money, the value we had that we wish we could exchange for something else, some of it goes into some regulatory worlds and some doesn't. I want to go buy some you commodities at the grocery store. I mean, it's a free and open transaction. There's no KYC or AML per se and that happens. >> But food has to get to the supermart. My point is. >> Marketplaces don't require regulation. >> Exactly my point. That's my point. >> Or additional red tape, right? But where we put other capital deaths. So whether you're buying share certificate, early stage investing. There's SEC filings, perhaps. >> Who regulated Linux? >> Who regulated Linux? I mean-- >> (laughs) >> It was self governing. >> Benevolent dictatorship with Torvalds. >> But the capital formation was different in the Linux industry. >> Yeah. >> It was the more traditional path that you just described, and so those were-- >> But I guess what I'm saying is that, you know, have a token. Some token could represent a commodity. Some token could represent a security. So there needs to be that distinction and a framework of clarity so that we understand what needs to be regulated and going on that path. And so I think that's, kind of, part of finding it's way over the past 12 months or so is this distinction. Some countries were very quick to say, "Here's a framework.", like Switzerland. That clarity here is taking some time here in Canada and the U.S. >> Yeah, and I think they should let things foster and incubate a bit because you don't know the gestation period of real technology, and I think I'm cool with community-oriented governance Because people will lose a boatload of case; some will gain. But that'll all sort itself out. And with good community involvement, it'll happen faster. I just find that a better path. I mean, some people can't stay with that tension. They overreact. Some people can't handle the risk. But you got to see how it plays out at some level. >> You definitely do. But there's also an opportunity for self-governance. You know, you have-- There's the regional internet registries, right? So you have ARIN RIPE in Europe and so forth. You know, if you want an IP address and so forth, there's a self-governing body that defines policy and how these things are going to be deseminated here in North America. The government, kind of, sets off with that. >> The DNS system. >> You know, absolutely. This is valuable-- >> Yeah. You know, you have national security with internet, but how IP's are deseminated, it's self-regulated. So at the end of the day, if the community doesn't decide to say, "Hey, some of these things, well let's define self-governing bodies." And if they can play a great role in it all, fanastic. Otherwise, then maybe the government steps in" If that's the type of country it is where they like to engage. >> Al, everyone's reimagining new opportunities with blockchain and crypto. You've certainly got good venture with DigitalBits. We'll certainly have a conversation later here this week about that. I know you got to get back for a panel that you're going to go on now. So thanks for coming on. And congratulations on the inaugural Global Cloud and Blockchain Summit. Looking forward to talking more about it. So theCUBE live in Toronto for coverage of the Global Blockchain event here with cloud. And then tomorrow kicks off the big show here, the Blockchain Futurist, about 2,000 attendees. That's really going to be connecting the dots of the future. TheCube will be there as well. Stay with us for more live coverage after this break.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by theCUBE. and also the mastermind behind this inaugural event. Thank you for coming to Toronto, Canada. and I want you to explain why you came up and along the way, each step you had some proprietary incumbents - Unix. but it still needed to be supported. and it's, you know, here we are. kind of the unwilling, if you will. to create capital structures. to permit you to have 10%, 20% of your time And, you know, direct messages, listening to you talk. So the question is essentially that you can, kind of, share and you kind of take a collective approach at this. it's given birth to the ICO. Capital formation dynamic that you're referring to. And then you have the, you know, Yeah, so that's the way that we've always, sort of, How do you really foster community up there? and it's coming to you in seconds. You guys talked about this last night in the fireside chat. And so you have a very active investor community up there, and then things sort of shifted to Japan. and those people just lost their desire. But you have that with any sort of new, exciting innovation. to buy alternative currencies. you know, here in Toronto, So again some more couple questions from the crowd. of the China, Japan, U.S. thing?" the fact that you have, And I hear the argument all the time if you factor in, kind of, It can be even more efficient. I want to go buy some you commodities But food has to get to the supermart. That's my point. So whether you're buying share certificate, But the capital formation was different that, you know, have a token. But you got to see how it plays out at some level. and how these things are going to be deseminated You know, absolutely. if the community doesn't decide to say, of the Global Blockchain event here with cloud.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Anthony Di Iorio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vietnam | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Torvalds | PERSON | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Toronto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Woz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Decentral | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Al Burgio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
DigitalBits.io | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
DigitalBits | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
SEC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.99+ |
two communities | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both communities | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Wednesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Toronto, Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
One guy | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.98+ |
Global Blockchain | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Blockchain Futurist Conference | EVENT | 0.98+ |
one time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first movers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each step | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 90% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Hong Kong | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Series B | OTHER | 0.97+ |
Series A | OTHER | 0.97+ |
2011 | DATE | 0.97+ |
Red Hat Enterprise Linux | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Al | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Digitalbits | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
two k | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
@DVellante | PERSON | 0.96+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
two worlds | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Global Cloud and Blockchain Summit | EVENT | 0.96+ |
about 2,000 attendees | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
90's | DATE | 0.96+ |
Fusechain | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
last night | DATE | 0.95+ |
Global Cloud & Blockchain Summit 2018 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
couple questions | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Red Hat | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Action Item | Blockchain & GDPR, May 4, 2018
hi I'm Peter Burris and welcome to this week's action item once again we're broadcasting from our beautiful the cube Studios in Palo Alto California and the wiki bond team is a little bit smaller this week for variety of reasons I'm being joined remotely by Neil Raiden and Jim Kabila's how you doing guys we're doing great Peter I'd be good thank you alright and it's actually a good team what we're gonna talk about we're gonna be specifically talking about some interesting developments and 14 days or so gdpr is gonna kick in and people who are behind will find themselves potentially subject to significant fines we actually were talking to a chief privacy officer here in the US who told us that had the Equinix breach occurred in Europe after May 25 2008 eeen it would have cost or Equifax the Equifax breach it would have cost Equifax over 160 billion dollars so these are very very real types of money that we're talking about but as we started thinking about some of the implications of gdpr and when it's going to happen and the circumstances of its of its success or failure and what its gonna mean commercially to businesses we also started trying to fold in a second trend and that second trend is the role of bitcoins going to play Bitcoin has a number of different benefits we'll get into some of that in a bit but one of them is that the data is immutable and gdpr has certain expectations regarding a firm's flexibility and how it can manage and handle data and blockchain may not line up with some of those issues as well as a lot of the Braque blockchain advocates might think Jim what are some of the specifics well Peter yeah blockchain is the underlying distributed hyper ledger or trusted database underlying Bitcoin and many other things blockchain yeah you know the one of the core things about blockchain that makes it distinctive is that you can create records and append them to block change you can read from them but can't delete them or update them it's not a crud database it's essentially for you to be able to go in and you know and erase a personally identifiable information record on an EU subject is you EU citizen in a blockchain it's not possible if you stored it there in other words blockchain then at the very start because it's an immutable database would not allow you to comply with the GDP ours were quite that people have been given a right to be forgotten as what what it's called that is a huge issue that might put the big kibosh on implementation of blockchain not just for PII in the EU but really for multinational businesses anybody who does business in Europe and the core you know coordination is like you know we're disregard brexit for now like Germany and France and Italy you got to be conformant completely worldwide essentially with your in your your PII management capabilities in order to pass muster with the regulators in the EU and avoid these massive fines blockchain seems like it would be incompatible with that compliance so where does the blockchain industry go or does it go anywhere or will it shrink well the mania died because of the GDP our slap in the face probably not there is a second issue as well Jim Lise I think there is and that is blockchain is allows for anonymity which means that everybody effectively has a copy of the ledger anywhere in the world so if you've got personally identifiable information coming out of the EU and you're a member or you're a part of that blockchain Network living in California you get a copy of the ledger now you may not be able to read the details and maybe that protects folks who might implement applications in blockchain but it's a combination of both the fact that the ledger is fully distributed and that you can't go in and make adjustments so that people can be forgotten based on EU laws if I got that right that's right and then there's a gray area you can't encrypt any and every record in a blockchain and conceal it from the prying eyes of people in California or in Thailand or wherever in the EU but that doesn't delete it that's not the same as erasing or deleting so there's a gray issue and there's no clarity from the EU regulators on this what if you use secret keys to encrypt individual records PII on a blockchain and then lost the keys or deleted the keys is that effectively would that be the same as he racing the record even though those bits still be there to be unreadable none of this has really been addressed in practice and so it's all a gray area it's a huge risk factor for companies that are considering exploring uses of blockchain for managing identity and you know security and all that other good stuff related to the records of people living in EU member countries so it seems as though we have two things they're gonna have that are that are likely to happen first off it's very clear that a lot of the GDP are related regulations were written in advance of comprehending what blockchain might be and so it doesn't and GDP are typically doesn't dictate implementation styles so it may have to be amended to accommodate some of the blocks a blockchain implementation style but it also suggests that increasingly we're going to hear from a design standpoint the breaking up of data associated with a transaction so that some of the metadata associated with that transaction may end up in the blockchain but some of the actual PII related data that is more sensitive from a GDP or other standpoint might remain outside of the blockchain so the blockchain effectively becomes a distributed secure network for managing metadata in certain types of complex transactions this is is that is that in scope of what we're talking about Jim yeah I bet you've raised and alluded to a big issue for implementers there will be on chain implementations of particular data data applications and off chain implementations off chain off blockchain will probably be all the PII you know in databases relational and so forth that allow you to do deletes and updates and so forth in you know to comply with you know gdpr and so forth and similar mandates elsewhere gdpr is not the only privacy mandate on earth and then there's on chain applications that you'll word the data what data sets will you store in blockchain you mentioned metadata now metadata I'm not sure because metadata quite often is is updated for lots of reasons for lots of operational patience but really fundamentally if we look at what a blockchain is it's a audit log it's an archive potentially of a just industry fashioned historical data that never changes and you don't want it to change ideally I mean I get an audit log you know let's say in the Internet of Things autonomous vehicles crashed and so forth and the data on how they operate should be stored you know either in a black box on the devices on the cars themself and also possibly backed up to a distributed blockchain where there is a transact or there's a there they a trusted persistent resilient record of what went on that would be a perfect idea for using block chains for storing perhaps trusted timestamp maybe encrypted records on things like that because ultimately the regulators and the courts and the lawyers and everybody else will want to come back and subpoena and use those records to and analyze what went on I mean for example that's an idea where something like a block shape and simile might be employed that doesn't necessarily have to involve PII unless of course it's an individual persons car and so there's all those great areas for those kinds of applications so right now it's kind of looking fuzzy for blockchain in lots of applications where identity can be either you know where you can infer easily the infer the identity of individuals from data that may not on the face of it look like it's PII so Neal I want to come back to you because it's this notion of being able to infer one of the things that's been going on in the industry for the past well 60 years is the dream of being able to create a transaction and persist that data but then generate derivative you out of that data through things like analytics data sharing etc blockchain because it is but you know it basically locks that data away from prying eyes it kind of suggests that we want to be careful about utilizing blockchain for applications where the data could have significant or could generate significant derivative use what do you think well we've known for a long long time that if you have anonymized data in the data set that it can merge that data with data from another data set relatively easy to find out who the individuals are right you add you add DNA stuff to that eh our records surveys things from social media you know everything about people and that's dangerous because we used to think that while losing are losing our privacy means that are going to keep giving us recommendations to buy these hands and shoes it's much more sinister than that you can be discriminated against in employment in insurance in your credit rating and all sorts of things so it's it's I think a really burning issue but what does it have to do with blockchain and G GD R that's an important question I think that blockchain is a really emerge short technology right now and like all image search technologies it's either going to evolve very quickly or it's gonna wither and die I'm not going to speculate which one it's going to be but this issue of how you can use it and how you can monetize data and things that are immutable I think they're all unanswered questions for the wider role of applications but to me it seems like you can get away from the immutable part by taking previous information and simply locking it away with encryption or something else and adding new information the problem becomes I think what happens to that data once someone uses it for other purpose than putting it in a ledger and the other question I have about GD d are in blockchain is who's enforcing this one army of people are sifting through all the stated at the side use and violation does it take a breach before they have it or is there something else going on the act of participating in a blockchain equivalent to owning or or having some visibility or something into a system so I am gdpr again hasn't doesn't seem to have answers to that question Jim what were you gonna say yeah the EU and its member nations have not worked out have not worked out those issues in terms of how will you know they monitor enforcement and enforce GDP are in practical terms I mean clearly it's gonna require on the parts of Germany and France and the others and maybe you know out of Brussels there might be some major Directorate for GDP our monitoring and oversight in terms of you know both companies operating in those nations as well as overseas with European Berger's none of that's been worked out by those nations clearly that's like you know it's just like the implementation issues like blockchain are not blockchain it's we're moving it toward the end of the month with you know not only those issues networked out many companies many enterprises both in Europe and elsewhere are not GDP are ready there may be some of them I'm not gonna name names may make a good boast that they are but know nobody really knows what it needs to be ready at this point I just this came to me very clearly when I asked Bernard Marr well-known author and you know influencer and the big data space at UM in Berlin a few weeks ago at at the data works and I said Bernard you know you consult all over with big companies what percentage of your clients and without giving names do you think are really truly GDP are already perm age when he said very few because they're not sure what it means either everybody's groping their way towards some kind of a hopefully risk mitigations threatened risk mitigation strategy for you know addressing this issue well the technology certainly is moving faster than the law and I'd say an argue even faster than the ethics it's going to be very interesting to see how things play out so we're just for anybody that's interested we are actually in the midst right now of doing right now doing some a nice piece of research on blockchain patterns for applications and what we're talking about essentially here is the idea that blockchain will be applicable to certain classes of applications but a whole bunch of other applications it will not be applicable to so it's another example of a technology that initially people go oh wow that's the technology it's going to solve all problems all date is going to move into the cloud Jim you like to point out Hadoop all data and all applications are going to migrate to the doop and clearly it's not going to happen Neil the way I would answer the question is it blockchain reduces the opportunity for multiple parties to enter into opportunism so that you can use a blockchain as a basis for assuring certain classes of behaviors as a group as a community and and and B and had that be relatively audible and understandable so it can reduce the opportunity for opportunism so you know companies like IBM probably you're right that the idea of a supply chain oriented blockchain that's capable of of assuring that all parties when they are working together are not exploiting holes in the contracts that they're actually complying in getting equal value out of whatever that blockchain system is and they're not gaining it while they can go off and use their own data to do other things if they want that's kind of the in chain and out of chain notion so it's going to be very interesting to see what happens over the course of next few years but clearly even in the example that I described the whole question of gdb our compliance doesn't go away all right so let's get to some action items here Nia what's your action item I suppose but when it comes to gdpr and blockchain I just have a huge number of questions about how they're actually going to be able to enforce it and when it comes to a personal information you know back in the Middle Ages when we went to the market to buy a baby pig they put it in a bag and tied it because they wouldn't want the piglet to run away because it'd take too much trouble to find it but when you got at home sometimes they actually didn't give you a pig they gave you a cat and when you opened up bag the cat was out of the bag that's where the phrase comes from so I'm just waiting for the cat to come out of the bag I I think this sounds like a real fad that was built around Bitcoin and we're trying to find some way to use it in some other way but I'm I just don't know what it is I'm not convinced Jim oxidiser my yeah my advice for Dana managers is to start to segment your data sets into those that are forgettable under gdpr and those that are unforgettable but forgettable ones is anything that has publicly identifiable information or that can be easily aggregated into identifying specific attributes and specific people whether they're in Europe or elsewhere is a secondary issue The Unforgettable is a stuff that it has to remain inviolate and persistent and can that be deleted and so forth the stuff all the unforgettables are suited to writing to one or more locked chains but they are not kosher with gdpr and other privacy mandates and focusing on the unforgettable data whatever that might be then conceivably investigate using blockchain for distributed you know you know access and so forth but they're mine the blockchain just one database technology among many in a very hybrid data architecture you got the Whitman way to skin the cat in terms of HDFS versus blockchain versus you know you know no first no sequel variants don't imagine because blockchain is the flavor of mania of the day that you got to go there there's lots and lots of alternatives all right so here's our action item overall this week we discussed on action item the coming confrontation between gdpr which is has been in effect for a while but actually fines will start being levied after May 25th and blockchain GPR has relatively or prescribed relatively script strict rules regarding a firm's control over personally identifiable in from you have to have it stored within the bounds of the EU if it's derives from an EU source and also it has to be forgettable that source if they choose to be forgotten the firm that owns that data or administers and stewards that data has to be able to get rid of it this is in conflict with blockchain which says that the Ledger's associated with a blockchain will be first of all fully distributed and second of all immutable and that provides some very powerful application opportunities but it's not gdpr compliant on the face of it over the course of the next few years no doubt we will see the EU and other bodies try to bring blockchain and block thing related technologies into a regulatory regime that actually is administrable as as well as auditable and enforceable but it's not there yet does that mean that folks in the EU should not be thinking about blockchains we don't know it means it introduces a risk that has to be accommodated but we at least think that the that what has to happen is data managers on a global basis need to start adding to it this concept of forgettable data and unforgettable data to ensure the cake can remain in compliance the final thing will say is that ultimately blockchain is another one of those technologies that has great science-fiction qualities to it but when you actually start thinking about how you're going to deploy it there are very practical realities associated with what it means to build an application on top of a blockchain datastore ultimately our expectation is that blockchain will be an important technology but it's going to take a number of years for knowledge to diffuse about what blockchain actually is suitable for and what it's not suitable for and this question of gdpr and blockchain interactions is going to be a important catalyst to having some of those conversations once again Neil Jim thank you very much for participating in action today my pleasure I'm Peter burger I'm Peter bursts and you've been once again listening to a wiki bond action item until we talk again
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jim Kabila | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Neil Raiden | PERSON | 0.99+ |
May 4, 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Berlin | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
EU | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Bernard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Equifax | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bernard Marr | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim Lise | PERSON | 0.99+ |
May 25 2008 | DATE | 0.99+ |
second issue | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
14 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Neil Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both companies | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second trend | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Neal | PERSON | 0.98+ |
second trend | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 160 billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Brussels | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
Jim oxidiser | PERSON | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
EU | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
this week | DATE | 0.96+ |
Neil | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Germany | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
this week | DATE | 0.94+ |
today | DATE | 0.93+ |
this week | DATE | 0.93+ |
60 years | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Middle Ages | DATE | 0.92+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
gdpr | TITLE | 0.91+ |
Whitman | PERSON | 0.9+ |
France | LOCATION | 0.88+ |
May 25th | DATE | 0.88+ |
a few weeks ago | DATE | 0.86+ |
Braque | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
gdpr | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Directorate for GDP | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.77+ |
Italy | LOCATION | 0.75+ |
Dana | PERSON | 0.74+ |
one database | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
lots | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
Hadoop | TITLE | 0.7+ |
next few years | DATE | 0.69+ |
one of those | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
end | DATE | 0.68+ |
wiki bond | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
next few years | DATE | 0.67+ |
Equinix | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
number of years | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
of people | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
Show Wrap with Dan Barnhardt - Inforum2017 - #Inforum2017 - #theCUBE
>> Narrator: Live from the Javits Center in New York City. It's the Cube, covering the Inforum 2017. Brought to you by Infor. >> We are wrapping up the Cube's day two coverage of conference here in New York City at Inforum. My name is Rebecca Knight, along with my cohost Dave Vellante. We're joined by Dan Barnhardt. He is the Infor Vice President of Communications. Thanks so much for joining us. >> Yes, thank you for having me. Thank you for being here two days in a row. >> It's been a lot of fun. We've had a great time. So yeah, congratulations, it's been a hugely successful conference, a lot of buzz. Recap it for us, what's been most exciting for you? >> Sure, this was our second year having a forum in New York, which is our home town. I think it was a more exciting conference than last year. We unveiled some incredible development updates, led by Coleman, our AI offering, which is an incredible announcement for us, as well as Networked CloudSuites, which takes the functionality from our GT Nexus commerce network, and bakes it into our CloudSuites, the mission critical industry CloudSuites, that we offer on the Amazon Web Services cloud. Those were really exciting developments, as well as some other announcements we made with regard to product. And then, in addition to product, we had a lot of customer momentum that we shared. Last year, we had customers like Whole Foods and Travis Perkins up here. We continued the momentum with big enterprise customers making big bets on Infor, led by Koch Industries who invested more than two billion dollars this year at Infor, and are now modernizing their human resources and their financial operations with Infor CloudSuites. Moving to the cloud HR for 130,000 employees at Koch Industries which is an incredible achievement for the product, and for cloud HR. And, that's very exciting, as well as other companies like FootLocker, which were recognized with the Innovation Award for our Progress Makers Award. They're using talent science, data science to power their employees, not to power their employees, but to drive their employees towards greater productivity and greater happiness, because they've got the right people in the right fit for FootLocker, that's very exciting. And, of course, Bank of America, our Customer of the Year, which uses our HR solutions for their workforce, which obviously is exceptionally large. >> Yes, there was a great ceremony this morning, with a lot of recognition. So, let's talk a little bit more about Coleman, this was the big product announcement, really the first product in AI for Infor. Tell us a little bit about the building blocks. >> For certain. We have a couple of AI offerings now, like predictive hotel pricing, predictive demand and assortment planning in retail, but we have been building towards Coleman and what we consider the age of networked intelligence for multiple years. Since we architected Infor CloudSuite to run mission critical ERP in the cloud, we developed the capability of having data, mission critical data that really runs a business, your manufacturing, finance, distribution core functions, in the cloud on AWS, which gives us hyper-scale compute power to crunch incredible data. So, that really became possible once we moved CloudSuite in 2014. And then in 2015, we acquired GT Nexus, which is a commerce network that unites, that brings in the 80 percent of enterprise data that lies outside the four walls, among suppliers, and logistics providers, and banks. That unified that into the CloudSuite and brought that data in, and we're able to crunch that using the compute power of AWS. And then last year at Inforum, we announced the acquisition of Predictix, which is a predictive solutions for retail. And when building those, Predictix was making such groundbreaking development in the area of machine learning that they spun off a separate group called Logicblox, just to focus on machine learning. And Inforum vested heavily, we didn't talk a lot about Logicblox, but that was going to deliver a lot of the capabilities along with Amazon's developments with Lex and Alexa to enable Coleman to come to reality. So we were able then to acquire Birst. Birst is a BI program that takes, and harmonizes, the data that comes across CloudSuite and GT Nexus in a digestible form that with the machine learning power from Logicblox can power Coleman. So now we have AI that's pervasive underneath the application, making decisions, recommending advice so that people can maximize their potential at work, not have to do more menial tasks like search and gather, which McKenzie has shown can take 20 percent of your work week just looking for the information and gathering the information to make decisions. Now, you can say Coleman get me this information, and Coleman is able to return that information to you instantly, and let you make decisions, which is very, very exciting breakthrough. >> So there's a lot there. When you and I talked prior to the show, I was kind of looking for okay, what's going to be new and different, and one of the things you said was we're really going to have a focus on innovation. So, in previous Inforums it's really been about, to me anyway, we do a lot of really hard work. We're hearing a lot about acquisitions, certainly AI and Coleman, how those acquisitions come together with your, you know, what Duncan Angove calls the layer cake, you know the wedding cake stack, the strategy stack, I call it. So do you feel like you've achieved those objectives of messaging that innovation, and what's the reaction then from the customer base? >> Without a doubt. I wouldn't characterize anything that we said last year as not innovative, we announced H&L Digital, our digital transformation arm which is doing some incredible custom projects, like for the Brooklyn Nets, essentially money balling the NBA. Look forward to seeing that in next season a little bit, and then more in the season to come. Some big projects with Travis Perkins and with some other customers, care dot com, that were mentioned. But this year we're unveiling Coleman, which takes a lot of pieces, as Duncan said sort of the wedding cake, and puts them together. This has been a development for years. And now we're able to unveil it, and we've chosen to name it Coleman in honor of Katherine Coleman Johnson, one of the ladies whose life was told in the movie Hidden Figures, and she was a pioneer African-American woman in Stem, which is an important cause for us. You know, Infor years ago when we were in New Orleans unveiled the Infor Education Alliance program so that we can invest in increasing Stem education among young people, all young people with a particular focus on minorities and women to increase the ranks of underrepresented communities in the technology industry. So this, Coleman, not only pays honor to Katherine Johnson the person, but also to her mission to increase the number of people that are choosing careers in Stem, which as we have shown is the future of work for human beings. >> So talk a little bit more about Infor's commitment to increasing number to increasing, not only Stem education, but as you said increasing the number of women and minorities who go into Stem careers. >> Certainly. We, you know Pam Murphy who is our chief operating officer, this has been an incredibly important cause to her as well as Charles Phillips our CEO. We launched the Women's Infor Network, WIN, several years ago and that's had some incredible results in helping to increase the number of women at Infor. Many years ago, I think it was Google that first released their diversity report, and it drew a lot of attention to how many women and how many minorities are in technology. And they got a lot of heat, because it was about 30, 35 percent of their workforce was female, and then as other companies started rolling out their diversity report, it was a consistent number between 30 to 35 percent, and what we identified from that was not that women are not getting the jobs, it's that there aren't as many women pursuing careers in this type of field. >> Rebecca: Pipeline. >> Yes. So in order to do that, we need to provide an environment that nurtures some of the specific needs that women have, and that we're promoting education. So we formed the WIN program to do that first task, and this year on International Women's Day in early March, we were able to show some of the results that came from that, particularly in senior positions, SVP, VP, and director level positions at Infor. Some have risen 60 percent the number of women in those roles since we launched the Women's Infor Network just a couple of years ago. And then we launched the Education Alliance Program. We partnered with institutions, like CUNY the City University of New York, the New York Urban League, and universities now across the globe, we've got them in India, in Thailand and China, in South Korea to help increase the number of people who are pursuing careers in Stem. We've also sponsored PBS series and Girls Who Code, we have a hack-athon going on here at Inforum with a bunch of young people who are building, sort of, add-on apps and widgets that go to company Infor. We're investing a lot in the growth of Stem education, and the next generation. >> And by the way, those numbers that you mentioned for Google and others at around 30, 34 percent, that's much better than the industry average. They're doing quote, unquote well and still far below the 50 percent which is what you would think, you know, based on population it would be. So mainly the average is around, or the actual number's around 17 percent in the technology business, and then the other thing I would add is Amazon, I believe, was pretty forthcoming about its compensation, you know. >> Salesforce really started it, Marc Benioff. >> And they got a lot of heat for it, but it's transparency is really the starting point, right? >> It was clear really early for companies like Salesforce, and Amazon, and Google, and Infor that this was not something that we needed to create talking points about, we were going to need to effect real change. And that was going to take investment and time, and thankfully with leadership like Charles Phillips, our CEO, and Marc Benioff were making investments to help make sure that the next generation of every human, but particularly women and minorities that are underrepresented right now in technology, have those skills that will be needed in the years to come. >> Right, you have to start with a benchmark and then know where you're moving from. >> Absolutely, just like if you're starting a project to transform your business, where do you want to go and what are the steps that are going to help you get there? >> Speaking of transforming your business, this is another big trend, is digital transformation. So now that we are at nearing the end of day two of this conference, what are you hearing from customers about this jaunting, sometimes painful process that they must endure, but really they must endure it in order to stay alive and to thrive? >> Without a doubt. A disruption is happening in every industry that we're seeing, and customers across all of the industries that Infor serves, like manufacturing, healthcare, retail, distribution, they are thinking about how do we survive in the new economy, when everything is digital, when every company needs to be a technology company. And we are working with our customers to help first modernize their systems. You can't be held back by old technology, you need to move to the cloud to get the flexibility and the agility that can adapt to changing business conditions and disruptions. No longer do you have years to adapt to things, they're happening overnight, you must have flexible solutions to do that. So, we have a lot of customers. We just had a panel with Travis Perkins, and with Pilot Flying J, who was on the Cube earlier, talking about how their, and Cook Industries our primary investor now, talking about how they're re-architecting their IT infrastructure to give them that agility so they can start thinking about what sort of projects could open up new streams of revenue. How could we, you know, do something else that we never thought of, but now we have the capability to do digitally that could be the future of our business? And it's really exciting to have all the CIOs, and SVPs of technology, VPs of technology, that are here at Inforum talking about what they're doing, and how they're imagining their business. It's really incredible to get a peek at what they're doing. >> You know, we were talking to Debbie earlier. One of the interesting things that I, my takeaway is on the digital transformation, is you know, we always say digital is data and then what we talked about was the ability to traverse industry value change, not just vertically but horizontally. Amazon buying Whole Foods is a perfect example, Amazon's a content company, Apple's getting into financial services. I wonder if you could comment on your thoughts on because you're so deep into micro-verticals, and what Debbie said was well I gave a consumer package good example to a process manufacturing company. And they were like what are you talking about, and she said look, let me connect the dots and the light bulbs went off. And they said wow, we could take that CPG example and apply it, so I wonder when we talk about digital transformation, if you see or can foresee your advantage in micro-verticals as translating across those verticals. >> Without a doubt. We talk about it as adjacent innovation. And Charles points back to an example, way back from the creation of the niche in glass, and how that led to additional businesses and industries like eyeglasses and fire preparedness, and we look at it that way for certain. We dive very deep into key industries, but when we look at them holistically across and we say oh, this is happening within the retail industry, we can identify key functionality that might change the industry of disruption, not disruption, distribution. Might disrupt the distribution industry, and we can apply the lessons learned by having that industry specialization into other industries and help them realize a potential that they weren't aware of before, because we uncovered it in one place. That's happening an awful lot with what we do with retail and assortment planning and healthcare. We run 70 percent of the large hospitals in the US, and we're learning a lot from retail and how we might help hospitals move more quickly. When you are managing life and death situations, if you are planning assortment or inventory for those key supplies within a hospital, and you can make even small adjustments that can have huge impact on patient care, so that's one of the benefits of our industry-first strategy, and the adjacent innovation that we cultivate there. >> I know we're not even finished with Inforum 2017, but we must look ahead to 2018. Talk a little bit about what your goals for next year's conference are. >> For sure. You're correct, we're not finished yet with Inforum. I know everyone here is really excited about Bruno Mars who's entertaining tonight, but we are looking forward to next year's conference as well, we're already talking about some of the innovative things that we'll announce, and the customer journeys that are beginning now, which we'd like to unveil there. We are going to be moving the conference from New York, we're going to move to Washington DC in late-September, September 24th to 27th in Washington DC, which we're very excited about to let our customers, they come back every year to learn more. We had seven thousand people attending this year, we want to give them a little bit of a variety, while still making sure that they can reach, you know, with one stop from Europe and from Asia, cause customers are traveling from all over the world, but we're very excited to see the growth that would be shared. This year, for instance, if you look at the sponsors, we had our primary SI partner Avaap was platinum partner last year. In addition to Avaap this year, we were joined by Accenture, and Deloitte, Capgemini, Grant Thorton, all of whom have built Infor practices over the last 12 months because there's so much momentum over our solutions that that is a revenue opportunity for them that they want to take advantage of. >> And the momentum is just going to keep on going next year in September. So I'll see you in September. >> Yeah, thank you very much. I appreciate you guys being here with us for the third year, second year in a row in New York. >> Indeed, thank you. I'm Rebecca Knight for Dave Vellante, we will have more from Inforum 2017 in a bit.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Infor. He is the Infor Vice President of Communications. Yes, thank you for having me. It's been a lot of fun. We continued the momentum with big enterprise really the first product in AI for Infor. a lot of the capabilities along with and different, and one of the things you said program so that we can invest in increasing increasing the number of women and minorities and it drew a lot of attention to how many women So in order to do that, we need to and still far below the 50 percent that this was not something that we and then know where you're moving from. So now that we are at nearing the end that could be the future of our business? and she said look, let me connect the dots and how that led to additional businesses but we must look ahead to 2018. at the sponsors, we had our primary SI partner Avaap And the momentum is just going to for the third year, second year in a row in New York. we will have more from Inforum 2017 in a bit.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dan Barnhardt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Marc Benioff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pam Murphy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Coleman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Duncan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Charles Phillips | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Koch Industries | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Debbie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Katherine Johnson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cook Industries | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rebecca | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
New York Urban League | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Washington DC | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Charles | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
70 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Whole Foods | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bruno Mars | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
Brooklyn Nets | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Deloitte | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CUNY | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
H&L Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
South Korea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
New Orleans | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Infor | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Logicblox | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
60 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Inforum | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bank of America | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
This year | DATE | 0.99+ |
130,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Capgemini | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Katherine Coleman Johnson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
35 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hidden Figures | TITLE | 0.99+ |
early March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Avaap | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Duncan Angove | PERSON | 0.99+ |
more than two billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven thousand people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
International Women's Day | EVENT | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
first product | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Panel Discussion | IBM Fast Track Your Data 2017
>> Narrator: Live, from Munich, Germany, it's the CUBE. Covering IBM, Fast Track Your Data. Brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome to Munich everybody. This is a special presentation of the CUBE, Fast Track Your Data, brought to you by IBM. My name is Dave Vellante. And I'm here with my cohost, Jim Kobielus. Jim, good to see you. Really good to see you in Munich. >> Jim: I'm glad I made it. >> Thanks for being here. So last year Jim and I hosted a panel at New York City on the CUBE. And it was quite an experience. We had, I think it was nine or 10 data scientists and we felt like that was a lot of people to organize and talk about data science. Well today, we're going to do a repeat of that. With a little bit of twist on topics. And we've got five data scientists. We're here live, in Munich. And we're going to kick off the Fast Track Your Data event with this data science panel. So I'm going to now introduce some of the panelists, or all of the panelists. Then we'll get into the discussions. I'm going to start with Lillian Pierson. Lillian thanks very much for being on the panel. You are in data science. You focus on training executives, students, and you're really a coach but with a lot of data science expertise based in Thailand, so welcome. >> Thank you, thank you so much for having me. >> Dave: You're very welcome. And so, I want to start with sort of when you focus on training people, data science, where do you start? >> Well it depends on the course that I'm teaching. But I try and start at the beginning so for my Big Data course, I actually start back at the fundamental concepts and definitions they would even need to understand in order to understand the basics of what Big Data is, data engineering. So, terms like data governance. Going into the vocabulary that makes up the very introduction of the course, so that later on the students can really grasp the concepts I present to them. You know I'm teaching a deep learning course as well, so in that case I start at a lot more advanced concepts. So it just really depends on the level of the course. >> Great, and we're going to come back to this topic of women in tech. But you know, we looked at some CUBE data the other day. About 17% of the technology industry comprises women. And so we're a little bit over that on our data science panel, we're about 20% today. So we'll come back to that topic. But I don't know if there's anything you would add? >> I'm really passionate about women in tech and women who code, in particular. And I'm connected with a lot of female programmers through Instagram. And we're supporting each other. So I'd love to take any questions you have on what we're doing in that space. At least as far as what's happening across the Instagram platform. >> Great, we'll circle back to that. All right, let me introduce Chris Penn. Chris, Boston based, all right, SMI. Chris is a marketing expert. Really trying to help people understand how to get, turn data into value from a marketing perspective. It's a very important topic. Not only because we get people to buy stuff but also understanding some of the risks associated with things like GDPR, which is coming up. So Chris, tell us a little bit about your background and your practice. >> So I actually started in IT and worked at a start up. And that's where I made the transition to marketing. Because marketing has much better parties. But what's really interesting about the way data science is infiltrating marketing is the technology came in first. You know, everything went digital. And now we're at a point where there's so much data. And most marketers, they kind of got into marketing as sort of the arts and crafts field. And are realizing now, they need a very strong, mathematical, statistical background. So one of the things, Adam, the reason why we're here and IBM is helping out tremendously is, making a lot of the data more accessible to people who do not have a data science background and probably never will. >> Great, okay thank you. I'm going to introduce Ronald Van Loon. Ronald, your practice is really all about helping people extract value out of data, driving competitive advantage, business advantage, or organizational excellence. Tell us a little bit about yourself, your background, and your practice. >> Basically, I've three different backgrounds. On one hand, I'm a director at a data consultancy firm called Adversitement. Where we help companies to become data driven. Mainly large companies. I'm an advisory board member at Simply Learn, which is an e-learning platform, especially also for big data analytics. And on the other hand I'm a blogger and I host a series of webinars. >> Okay, great, now Dez, Dez Blanchfield, I met you on Twitter, you know, probably a couple of years ago. We first really started to collaborate last year. We've spend a fair amount of time together. You are a data scientist, but you're also a jack of all trades. You've got a technology background. You sit on a number of boards. You work very active with public policy. So tell us a little bit more about what you're doing these days, a little bit more about your background. >> Sure, I think my primary challenge these days is communication. Trying to join the dots between my technical background and deeply technical pedigree, to just plain English, every day language, and business speak. So bridging that technical world with what's happening in the boardroom. Toe to toe with the geeks to plain English to execs in boards. And just hand hold them and steward them through the journey of the challenges they're facing. Whether it's the enormous rapid of change and the pace of change, that's just almost exhaustive and causing them to sprint. But not just sprint in one race but in multiple lanes at the same time. As well as some of the really big things that are coming up, that we've seen like GDPR. So it's that communication challenge and just hand holding people through that journey and that mix of technical and commercial experience. >> Great, thank you, and finally Joe Caserta. Founder and president of Caserta Concepts. Joe you're a practitioner. You're in the front lines, helping organizations, similar to Ronald. Extracting value from data. Translate that into competitive advantage. Tell us a little bit about what you're doing these days in Caserta Concepts. >> Thanks Dave, thanks for having me. Yeah, so Caserta's been around. I've been doing this for 30 years now. And natural progressions have been just getting more from application development, to data warehousing, to big data analytics, to data science. Very, very organically, that's just because it's where businesses need the help the most, over the years. And right now, the big focus is governance. At least in my world. Trying to govern when you have a bunch of disparate data coming from a bunch of systems that you have no control over, right? Like social media, and third party data systems. Bringing it in and how to you organize it? How do you ingest it? How do you govern it? How do you keep it safe? And also help to define ownership of the data within an organization within an enterprise? That's also a very hot topic. Which ties back into GDPR. >> Great, okay, so we're going to be unpacking a lot of topics associated with the expertise that these individuals have. I'm going to bring in Jim Kobielus, to the conversation. Jim, the newest Wikibon analyst. And newest member of the SiliconANGLE Media Team. Jim, get us started off. >> Yeah, so we're at an event, at an IBM event where machine learning and data science are at the heart of it. There are really three core themes here. Machine learning and data science, on the one hand. Unified governance on the other. And hybrid data management. I want to circle back or focus on machine learning. Machine learning is the coin of the realm, right now in all things data. Machine learning is the heart of AI. Machine learning, everybody is going, hiring, data scientists to do machine learning. I want to get a sense from our panel, who are experts in this area, what are the chief innovations and trends right now on machine learning. Not deep learning, the core of machine learning. What's super hot? What's in terms of new techniques, new technologies, new ways of organizing teams to build and to train machine learning models? I'd like to open it up. Let's just start with Lillian. What are your thoughts about trends in machine learning? What's really hot? >> It's funny that you excluded deep learning from the response for this, because I think the hottest space in machine learning is deep learning. And deep learning is machine learning. I see a lot of collaborative platforms coming out, where people, data scientists are able to work together with other sorts of data professionals to reduce redundancies in workflows. And create more efficient data science systems. >> Is there much uptake of these crowd sourcing environments for training machine learning wells. Like CrowdFlower, or Amazon Mechanical Turk, or Mighty AI? Is that a huge trend in terms of the workflow of data science or machine learning, a lot of that? >> I don't see that crowdsourcing is like, okay maybe I've been out of the crowdsourcing space for a while. But I was working with Standby Task Force back in 2013. And we were doing a lot of crowdsourcing. And I haven't seen the industry has been increasing, but I could be wrong. I mean, because there's no, if you're building automation models, most of the, a lot of the work that's being crowdsourced could actually be automated if someone took the time to just build the scripts and build the models. And so I don't imagine that, that's going to be a trend that's increasing. >> Well, automation machine learning pipeline is fairly hot, in terms of I'm seeing more and more research. Google's doing a fair amount of automated machine learning. The panel, what do you think about automation, in terms of the core modeling tasks involved in machine learning. Is that coming along? Are data scientists in danger of automating themselves out of a job? >> I don't think there's a risk of data scientist's being put out of a job. Let's just put that on the thing. I do think we need to get a bit clearer about this meme of the mythical unicorn. But to your call point about machine learning, I think what you'll see, we saw the cloud become baked into products, just as a given. I think machine learning is already crossed this threshold. We just haven't necessarily noticed or caught up. And if we look at, we're at an IBM event, so let's just do a call out for them. The data science experience platform, for example. Machine learning's built into a whole range of things around algorithm and data classification. And there's an assisted, guided model for how you get to certain steps, where you don't actually have to understand how machine learning works. You don't have to understand how the algorithms work. It shows you the different options you've got and you can choose them. So you might choose regression. And it'll give you different options on how to do that. So I think we've already crossed this threshold of baking in machine learning and baking in the data science tools. And we've seen that with Cloud and other technologies where, you know, the Office 365 is not, you can't get a non Cloud Office 365 account, right? I think that's already happened in machine learning. What we're seeing though, is organizations even as large as the Googles still in catch up mode, in my view, on some of the shift that's taken place. So we've seen them write little games and apps where people do doodles and then it runs through the ML library and says, "Well that's a cow, or a unicorn, or a duck." And you get awards, and gold coins, and whatnot. But you know, as far as 12 years ago I was working on a project, where we had full size airplanes acting as drones. And we mapped with two and 3-D imagery. With 2-D high res imagery and LiDAR for 3-D point Clouds. We were finding poles and wires for utility companies, using ML before it even became a trend. And baking it right into the tools. And used to store on our web page and clicked and pointed on. >> To counter Lillian's point, it's not crowdsourcing but crowd sharing that's really powering a lot of the rapid leaps forward. If you look at, you know, DSX from IBM. Or you look at Node-RED, huge number of free workflows that someone has probably already done the thing that you are trying to do. Go out and find in the libraries, through Jupyter and R Notebooks, there's an ability-- >> Chris can you define before you go-- >> Chris: Sure. >> This is great, crowdsourcing versus crowd sharing. What's the distinction? >> Well, so crowdsourcing, kind of, where in the context of the question you ask is like I'm looking for stuff that other people, getting people to do stuff that, for me. It's like asking people to mine classifieds. Whereas crowd sharing, someone has done the thing already, it already exists. You're not purpose built, saying, "Jim, help me build this thing." It's like, "Oh Jim, you already "built this thing, cool. "So can I fork it and make my own from it?" >> Okay, I see what you mean, keep going. >> And then, again, going back to earlier. In terms of the advancements. Really deep learning, it probably is a good idea to just sort of define these things. Machine learning is how machines do things without being explicitly programmed to do them. Deep learning's like if you can imagine a stack of pancakes, right? Each pancake is a type of machine learning algorithm. And your data is the syrup. You pour the data on it. It goes from layer, to layer, to layer, to layer, and what you end up with at the end is breakfast. That's the easiest analogy for what deep learning is. Now imagine a stack of pancakes, 500 or 1,000 high, that's where deep learning's going now. >> Sure, multi layered machine learning models, essentially, that have the ability to do higher levels of abstraction. Like image analysis, Lillian? >> I had a comment to add about automation and data science. Because there are a lot of tools that are able to, or applications that are able to use data science algorithms and output results. But the reason that data scientists aren't in risk of losing their jobs, is because just because you can get the result, you also have to be able to interpret it. Which means you have to understand it. And that involves deep math and statistical understanding. Plus domain expertise. So, okay, great, you took out the coding element but that doesn't mean you can codify a person's ability to understand and apply that insight. >> Dave: Joe, you have something to add? >> I could just add that I see the trend. Really, the reason we're talking about it today is machine learning is not necessarily, it's not new, like Dez was saying. But what's different is the accessibility of it now. It's just so easily accessible. All of the tools that are coming out, for data, have machine learning built into it. So the machine learning algorithms, which used to be a black art, you know, years ago, now is just very easily accessible. That you can get, it's part of everyone's toolbox. And the other reason that we're talking about it more, is that data science is starting to become a core curriculum in higher education. Which is something that's new, right? That didn't exist 10 years ago? But over the past five years, I'd say, you know, it's becoming more and more easily accessible for education. So now, people understand it. And now we have it accessible in our tool sets. So now we can apply it. And I think that's, those two things coming together is really making it becoming part of the standard of doing analytics. And I guess the last part is, once we can train the machines to start doing the analytics, right? And get smarter as it ingests more data. And then we can actually take that and embed it in our applications. That's the part that you still need data scientists to create that. But once we can have standalone appliances that are intelligent, that's when we're going to start seeing, really, machine learning and artificial intelligence really start to take off even more. >> Dave: So I'd like to switch gears a little bit and bring Ronald on. >> Okay, yes. >> Here you go, there. >> Ronald, the bromide in this sort of big data world we live in is, the data is the new oil. You got to be a data driven company and many other cliches. But when you talk to organizations and you start to peel the onion. You find that most companies really don't have a good way to connect data with business impact and business value. What are you seeing with your clients and just generally in the community, with how companies are doing that? How should they do that? I mean, is that something that is a viable approach? You don't see accountants, for example, quantifying the value of data on a balance sheet. There's no standards for doing that. And so it's sort of this fuzzy concept. How are and how should organizations take advantage of data and turn it into value. >> So, I think in general, if you look how companies look at data. They have departments and within the departments they have tools specific for this department. And what you see is that there's no central, let's say, data collection. There's no central management of governance. There's no central management of quality. There's no central management of security. Each department is manages their data on their own. So if you didn't ask, on one hand, "Okay, how should they do it?" It's basically go back to the drawing table and say, "Okay, how should we do it?" We should collect centrally, the data. And we should take care for central governance. We should take care for central data quality. We should take care for centrally managing this data. And look from a company perspective and not from a department perspective what the value of data is. So, look at the perspective from your whole company. And this means that it has to be brought on one end to, whether it's from C level, where most of them still fail to understand what it really means. And what the impact can be for that company. >> It's a hard problem. Because data by its' very nature is now so decentralized. But Chris you have a-- >> The thing I want to add to that is, think about in terms of valuing data. Look at what it would cost you for data breach. Like what is the expensive of having your data compromised. If you don't have governance. If you don't have policy in place. Look at the major breaches of the last couple years. And how many billions of dollars those companies lost in market value, and trust, and all that stuff. That's one way you can value data very easily. "What will it cost us if we mess this up?" >> So a lot of CEOs will hear that and say, "Okay, I get it. "I have to spend to protect myself, "but I'd like to make a little money off of this data thing. "How do I do that?" >> Well, I like to think of it, you know, I think data's definitely an asset within an organization. And is becoming more and more of an asset as the years go by. But data is still a raw material. And that's the way I think about it. In order to actually get the value, just like if you're creating any product, you start with raw materials and then you refine it. And then it becomes a product. For data, data is a raw material. You need to refine it. And then the insight is the product. And that's really where the value is. And the insight is absolutely, you can monetize your insight. >> So data is, abundant insights are scarce. >> Well, you know, actually you could say that intermediate between insights and the data are the models themselves. The statistical, predictive, machine learning models. That are a crystallization of insights that have been gained by people called data scientists. What are your thoughts on that? Are statistical, predictive, machine learning models something, an asset, that companies, organizations, should manage governance of on a centralized basis or not? >> Well the models are essentially the refinery system, right? So as you're refining your data, you need to have process around how you exactly do that. Just like refining anything else. It needs to be controlled and it needs to be governed. And I think that data is no different from that. And I think that it's very undisciplined right now, in the market or in the industry. And I think maturing that discipline around data science, I think is something that's going to be a very high focus in this year and next. >> You were mentioning, "How do you make money from data?" Because there's all this risk associated with security breaches. But at the risk of sounding simplistic, you can generate revenue from system optimization, or from developing products and services. Using data to develop products and services that better meet the demands and requirements of your markets. So that you can sell more. So either you are using data to earn more money. Or you're using data to optimize your system so you have less cost. And that's a simple answer for how you're going to be making money from the data. But yes, there is always the counter to that, which is the security risks. >> Well, and my question really relates to, you know, when you think of talking to C level executives, they kind of think about running the business, growing the business, and transforming the business. And a lot of times they can't fund these transformations. And so I would agree, there's many, many opportunities to monetize data, cut costs, increase revenue. But organizations seem to struggle to either make a business case. And actually implement that transformation. >> Dave, I'd love to have a crack at that. I think this conversation epitomizes the type of things that are happening in board rooms and C suites already. So we've really quickly dived into the detail of data. And the detail of machine learning. And the detail of data science, without actually stopping and taking a breath and saying, "Well, we've "got lots of it, but what have we got? "Where is it? "What's the value of it? "Is there any value in it at all?" And, "How much time and money should we invest in it?" For example, we talk of being about a resource. I look at data as a utility. When I turn the tap on to get a drink of water, it's there as a utility. I counted it being there but I don't always sample the quality of the water and I probably should. It could have Giardia in it, right? But what's interesting is I trust the water at home, in Sydney. Because we have a fairly good experience with good quality water. If I were to go to some other nation. I probably wouldn't trust that water. And I think, when you think about it, what's happening in organizations. It's almost the same as what we're seeing here today. We're having a lot of fun, diving into the detail. But what we've forgotten to do is ask the question, "Well why is data even important? "What's the reasoning to the business? "Why are we in business? "What are we doing as an organization? "And where does data fit into that?" As opposed to becoming so fixated on data because it's a media hyped topic. I think once you can wind that back a bit and say, "Well, we have lot's of data, "but is it good data? "Is it quality data? "Where's it coming from? "Is it ours? "Are we allowed to have it? "What treatment are we allowed to give that data?" As you said, "Are we controlling it? "And where are we controlling it? "Who owns it?" There's so many questions to be asked. But the first question I like to ask people in plain English is, "Well is there any value "in data in the first place? "What decisions are you making that data can help drive? "What things are in your organizations, "KPIs and milestones you're trying to meet "that data might be a support?" So then instead of becoming fixated with data as a thing in itself, it becomes part of your DNA. Does that make sense? >> Think about what money means. The Economists' Rhyme, "Money is a measure for, "a systems for, a medium, a measure, and exchange." So it's a medium of exchange. A measure of value, a way to exchange something. And a way to store value. Data, good clean data, well governed, fits all four of those. So if you're trying to figure out, "How do we make money out of stuff." Figure out how money works. And then figure out how you map data to it. >> So if we approach and we start with a company, we always start with business case, which is quite clear. And defined use case, basically, start with a team on one hand, marketing people, sales people, operational people, and also the whole data science team. So start with this case. It's like, defining, basically a movie. If you want to create the movie, You know where you're going to. You know what you want to achieve to create the customer experience. And this is basically the same with a business case. Where you define, "This is the case. "And this is how we're going to derive value, "start with it and deliver value within a month." And after the month, you check, "Okay, where are we and how can we move forward? "And what's the value that we've brought?" >> Now I as well, start with business case. I've done thousands of business cases in my life, with organizations. And unless that organization was kind of a data broker, the business case rarely has a discreet component around data. Is that changing, in your experience? >> Yes, so we guide companies into be data driven. So initially, indeed, they don't like to use the data. They don't like to use the analysis. So that's why, how we help. And is it changing? Yes, they understand that they need to change. But changing people is not always easy. So, you see, it's hard if you're not involved and you're not guiding it, they fall back in doing the daily tasks. So it's changing, but it's a hard change. >> Well and that's where this common parlance comes in. And Lillian, you, sort of, this is what you do for a living, is helping people understand these things, as you've been sort of evangelizing that common parlance. But do you have anything to add? >> I wanted to add that for organizational implementations, another key component to success is to start small. Start in one small line of business. And then when you've mastered that area and made it successful, then try and deploy it in more areas of the business. And as far as initializing big data implementation, that's generally how to do it successfully. >> There's the whole issue of putting a value on data as a discreet asset. Then there's the issue, how do you put a value on a data lake? Because a data lake, is essentially an asset you build on spec. It's an exploratory archive, essentially, of all kinds of data that might yield some insights, but you have to have a team of data scientists doing exploration and modeling. But it's all on spec. How do you put a value on a data lake? And at what point does the data lake itself become a burden? Because you got to store that data and manage it. At what point do you drain that lake? At what point, do the costs of maintaining that lake outweigh the opportunity costs of not holding onto it? >> So each Hadoop note is approximately $20,000 per year cost for storage. So I think that there needs to be a test and a diagnostic, before even inputting, ingesting the data and storing it. "Is this actually going to be useful? "What value do we plan to create from this?" Because really, you can't store all the data. And it's a lot cheaper to store data in Hadoop then it was in traditional systems but it's definitely not free. So people need to be applying this test before even ingesting the data. Why do we need this? What business value? >> I think the question we need to also ask around this is, "Why are we building data lakes "in the first place? "So what's the function it's going to perform for you?" There's been a huge drive to this idea. "We need a data lake. "We need to put it all somewhere." But invariably they become data swamps. And we only half jokingly say that because I've seen 90 day projects turn from a great idea, to a really bad nightmare. And as Lillian said, it is cheaper in some ways to put it into a HDFS platform, in a technical sense. But when we look at all the fully burdened components, it's actually more expensive to find Hadoop specialists and Spark specialists to maintain that cluster. And invariably I'm finding that big data, quote unquote, is not actually so much lots of data, it's complex data. And as Lillian said, "You don't always "need to store it all." So I think if we go back to the question of, "What's the function of a data lake in the first place? "Why are we building one?" And then start to build some fully burdened cost components around that. We'll quickly find that we don't actually need a data lake, per se. We just need an interim data store. So we might take last years' data and tokenize it, and analyze it, and do some analytics on it, and just keep the meta data. So I think there is this rush, for a whole range of reasons, particularly vendor driven. To build data lakes because we think they're a necessity, when in reality they may just be an interim requirement and we don't need to keep them for a long term. >> I'm going to attempt to, the last few questions, put them all together. And I think, they all belong together because one of the reasons why there's such hesitation about progress within the data world is because there's just so much accumulated tech debt already. Where there's a new idea. We go out and we build it. And six months, three years, it really depends on how big the idea is, millions of dollars is spent. And then by the time things are built the idea is pretty much obsolete, no one really cares anymore. And I think what's exciting now is that the speed to value is just so much faster than it's ever been before. And I think that, you know, what makes that possible is this concept of, I don't think of a data lake as a thing. I think of a data lake as an ecosystem. And that ecosystem has evolved so much more, probably in the last three years than it has in the past 30 years. And it's exciting times, because now once we have this ecosystem in place, if we have a new idea, we can actually do it in minutes not years. And that's really the exciting part. And I think, you know, data lake versus a data swamp, comes back to just traditional data architecture. And if you architect your data lake right, you're going to have something that's substantial, that's you're going to be able to harness and grow. If you don't do it right. If you just throw data. If you buy Hadoop cluster or a Cloud platform and just throw your data out there and say, "We have a lake now." yeah, you're going to create a mess. And I think taking the time to really understand, you know, the new paradigm of data architecture and modern data engineering, and actually doing it in a very disciplined way. If you think about it, what we're doing is we're building laboratories. And if you have a shabby, poorly built laboratory, the best scientist in the world isn't going to be able to prove his theories. So if you have a well built laboratory and a clean room, then, you know a scientist can get what he needs done very, very, very efficiently. And that's the goal, I think, of data management today. >> I'd like to just quickly add that I totally agree with the challenge between on premise and Cloud mode. And I think one of the strong themes of today is going to be the hybrid data management challenge. And I think organizations, some organizations, have rushed to adopt Cloud. And thinking it's a really good place to dump the data and someone else has to manage the problem. And then they've ended up with a very expensive death by 1,000 cuts in some senses. And then others have been very reluctant as a result of not gotten access to rapid moving and disruptive technology. So I think there's a really big challenge to get a basic conversation going around what's the value using Cloud technology as in adopting it, versus what are the risks? And when's the right time to move? For example, should we Cloud Burst for workloads? Do we move whole data sets in there? You know, moving half a petabyte of data into a Cloud platform back is a non-trivial exercise. But moving a terabyte isn't actually that big a deal anymore. So, you know, should we keep stuff behind the firewalls? I'd be interested in seeing this week where 80% of the data, supposedly is. And just push out for Cloud tools, machine learning, data science tools, whatever they might be, cognitive analytics, et cetera. And keep the bulk of the data on premise. Or should we just move whole spools into the Cloud? There is no one size fits all. There's no silver bullet. Every organization has it's own quirks and own nuances they need to think through and make a decision themselves. >> Very often, Dez, organizations have zonal architectures so you'll have a data lake that consists of a no sequel platform that might be used for say, mobile applications. A Hadoop platform that might be used for unstructured data refinement, so forth. A streaming platform, so forth and so on. And then you'll have machine learning models that are built and optimized for those different platforms. So, you know, think of it in terms of then, your data lake, is a set of zones that-- >> It gets even more complex just playing on that theme, when you think about what Cisco started, called Folk Computing. I don't really like that term. But edge analytics, or computing at the edge. We've seen with the internet coming along where we couldn't deliver everything with a central data center. So we started creating this concept of content delivery networks, right? I think the same thing, I know the same thing has happened in data analysis and data processing. Where we've been pulling social media out of the Cloud, per se, and bringing it back to a central source. And doing analytics on it. But when you think of something like, say for example, when the Dreamliner 787 from Boeing came out, this airplane created 1/2 a terabyte of data per flight. Now let's just do some quick, back of the envelope math. There's 87,400 fights a day, just in the domestic airspace in the USA alone, per day. Now 87,400 by 1/2 a terabyte, that's 43 point five petabytes a day. You physically can't copy that from quote unquote in the Cloud, if you'll pardon the pun, back to the data center. So now we've got the challenge, a lot of our Enterprise data's behind a firewall, supposedly 80% of it. But what's out at the edge of the network. Where's the value in that data? So there are zonal challenges. Now what do I do with my Enterprise versus the open data, the mobile data, the machine data. >> Yeah, we've seen some recent data from IDC that says, "About 43% of the data "is going to stay at the edge." We think that, that's way understated, just given the examples. We think it's closer to 90% is going to stay at the edge. >> Just on the airplane topic, right? So Airbus wasn't going to be outdone. Boeing put 4,000 sensors or something in their 787 Dreamliner six years ago. Airbus just announced an 83, 81,000 with 10,000 sensors in it. Do the same math. Now the FAA in the US said that all aircraft and all carriers have to be, by early next year, I think it's like March or April next year, have to be at the same level of BIOS. Or the same capability of data collection and so forth. It's kind of like a mini GDPR for airlines. So with the 83, 81,000 with 10,000 sensors, that becomes two point five terabytes per flight. If you do the math, it's 220 petabytes of data just in one day's traffic, domestically in the US. Now, it's just so mind boggling that we're going to have to completely turn our thinking on its' head, on what do we do behind the firewall? What do we do in the Cloud versus what we might have to do in the airplane? I mean, think about edge analytics in the airplane processing data, as you said, Jim, streaming analytics in flight. >> Yeah that's a big topic within Wikibon, so, within the team. Me and David Floyer, and my other colleagues. They're talking about the whole notion of edge architecture. Not only will most of the data be persisted at the edge, most of the deep learning models like TensorFlow will be executed at the edge. To some degree, the training of those models will happen in the Cloud. But much of that will be pushed in a federated fashion to the edge, or at least I'm predicting. We're already seeing some industry moves in that direction, in terms of architectures. Google has a federated training, project or initiative. >> Chris: Look at TensorFlow Lite. >> Which is really fascinating for it's geared to IOT, I'm sorry, go ahead. >> Look at TensorFlow Lite. I mean in the announcement of having every Android device having ML capabilities, is Google's essential acknowledgment, "We can't do it all." So we need to essentially, sort of like a setting at home. Everyone's smartphone top TV box just to help with the processing. >> Now we're talking about this, this sort of leads to this IOT discussion but I want to underscore the operating model. As you were saying, "You can't just "lift and shift to the Cloud." You're not going to, CEOs aren't going to get the billion dollar hit by just doing that. So you got to change the operating model. And that leads to, this discussion of IOT. And an entirely new operating model. >> Well, there are companies that are like Sisense who have worked with Intel. And they've taken this concept. They've taken the business logic and not just putting it in the chip, but actually putting it in memory, in the chip. So as data's going through the chip it's not just actually being processed but it's actually being baked in memory. So level one, two, and three cache. Now this is a game changer. Because as Chris was saying, even if we were to get the data back to a central location, the compute load, I saw a real interesting thing from I think it was Google the other day, one of the guys was doing a talk. And he spoke about what it meant to add cognitive and voice processing into just the Android platform. And they used some number, like that had, double the amount of compute they had, just to add voice for free, to the Android platform. Now even for Google, that's a nontrivial exercise. So as Chris was saying, I think we have to again, flip it on its' head and say, "How much can we put "at the edge of the network?" Because think about these phones. I mean, even your fridge and microwave, right? We put a man on the moon with something that these days, we make for $89 at home, on the Raspberry Pie computer, right? And even that was 1,000 times more powerful. When we start looking at what's going into the chips, we've seen people build new, not even GPUs, but deep learning and stream analytics capable chips. Like Google, for example. That's going to make its' way into consumer products. So that, now the compute capacity in phones, is going to, I think transmogrify in some ways because there is some magic in there. To the point where, as Chris was saying, "We're going to have the smarts in our phone." And a lot of that workload is going to move closer to us. And only the metadata that we need to move is going to go centrally. >> Well here's the thing. The edge isn't the technology. The edge is actually the people. When you look at, for example, the MIT language Scratch. This is kids programming language. It's drag and drop. You know, kids can assemble really fun animations and make little movies. We're training them to build for IOT. Because if you look at a system like Node-RED, it's an IBM interface that is drag and drop. Your workflow is for IOT. And you can push that to a device. Scratch has a converter for doing those. So the edge is what those thousands and millions of kids who are learning how to code, learning how to think architecturally and algorithmically. What they're going to create that is beyond what any of us can possibly imagine. >> I'd like to add one other thing, as well. I think there's a topic we've got to start tabling. And that is what I refer to as the gravity of data. So when you think about how planets are formed, right? Particles of dust accrete. They form into planets. Planets develop gravity. And the reason we're not flying into space right now is that there's gravitational force. Even though it's one of the weakest forces, it keeps us on our feet. Oftentimes in organizations, I ask them to start thinking about, "Where is the center "of your universe with regard to the gravity of data." Because if you can follow the center of your universe and the gravity of your data, you can often, as Chris is saying, find where the business logic needs to be. And it could be that you got to think about a storage problem. You can think about a compute problem. You can think about a streaming analytics problem. But if you can find where the center of your universe and the center of your gravity for your data is, often you can get a really good insight into where you can start focusing on where the workloads are going to be where the smarts are going to be. Whether it's small, medium, or large. >> So this brings up the topic of data governance. One of the themes here at Fast Track Your Data is GDPR. What it means. It's one of the reasons, I think IBM selected Europe, generally, Munich specifically. So let's talk about GDPR. We had a really interesting discussion last night. So let's kind of recreate some of that. I'd like somebody in the panel to start with, what is GDPR? And why does it matter, Ronald? >> Yeah, maybe I can start. Maybe a little bit more in general unified governance. So if i talk to companies and I need to explain to them what's governance, I basically compare it with a crime scene. So in a crime scene if something happens, they start with securing all the evidence. So they start sealing the environment. And take care that all the evidence is collected. And on the other hand, you see that they need to protect this evidence. There are all kinds of policies. There are all kinds of procedures. There are all kinds of rules, that need to be followed. To take care that the whole evidence is secured well. And once you start, basically, investigating. So you have the crime scene investigators. You have the research lab. You have all different kind of people. They need to have consent before they can use all this evidence. And the whole reason why they're doing this is in order to collect the villain, the crook. To catch him and on the other hand, once he's there, to convict him. And we do this to have trust in the materials. Or trust in basically, the analytics. And on the other hand to, the public have trust in everything what's happened with the data. So if you look to a company, where data is basically the evidence, this is the value of your data. It's similar to like the evidence within a crime scene. But most companies don't treat it like this. So if we then look to GDPR, GDPR basically shifts the power and the ownership of the data from the company to the person that created it. Which is often, let's say the consumer. And there's a lot of paradox in this. Because all the companies say, "We need to have this customer data. "Because we need to improve the customer experience." So if you make it concrete and let's say it's 1st of June, so GDPR is active. And it's first of June 2018. And I go to iTunes, so I use iTunes. Let's go to iTunes said, "Okay, Apple please "give me access to my data." I want to see which kind of personal information you have stored for me. On the other end, I want to have the right to rectify all this data. I want to be able to change it and give them a different level of how they can use my data. So I ask this to iTunes. And then I say to them, okay, "I basically don't like you anymore. "I want to go to Spotify. "So please transfer all my personal data to Spotify." So that's possible once it's June 18. Then I go back to iTunes and say, "Okay, I don't like it anymore. "Please reduce my consent. "I withdraw my consent. "And I want you to remove all my "personal data for everything that you use." And I go to Spotify and I give them, let's say, consent for using my data. So this is a shift where you can, as a person be the owner of the data. And this has a lot of consequences, of course, for organizations, how to manage this. So it's quite simple for the consumer. They get the power, it's maturing the whole law system. But it's a big consequence of course for organizations. >> This is going to be a nightmare for marketers. But fill in some of the gaps there. >> Let's go back, so GDPR, the General Data Protection Regulation, was passed by the EU in 2016, in May of 2016. It is, as Ronald was saying, it's four basic things. The right to privacy. The right to be forgotten. Privacy built into systems by default. And the right to data transfer. >> Joe: It takes effect next year. >> It is already in effect. GDPR took effect in May of 2016. The enforcement penalties take place the 25th of May 2018. Now here's where, there's two things on the penalty side that are important for everyone to know. Now number one, GDPR is extra territorial. Which means that an EU citizen, anywhere on the planet has GDPR, goes with them. So say you're a pizza shop in Nebraska. And an EU citizen walks in, orders a pizza. Gives her the credit card and stuff like that. If you for some reason, store that data, GDPR now applies to you, Mr. Pizza shop, whether or not you do business in the EU. Because an EU citizen's data is with you. Two, the penalties are much stiffer then they ever have been. In the old days companies could simply write off penalties as saying, "That's the cost of doing business." With GDPR the penalties are up to 4% of your annual revenue or 20 million Euros, whichever is greater. And there may be criminal sanctions, charges, against key company executives. So there's a lot of questions about how this is going to be implemented. But one of the first impacts you'll see from a marketing perspective is all the advertising we do, targeting people by their age, by their personally identifiable information, by their demographics. Between now and May 25th 2018, a good chunk of that may have to go away because there's no way for you to say, "Well this person's an EU citizen, this person's not." People give false information all the time online. So how do you differentiate it? Every company, regardless of whether they're in the EU or not will have to adapt to it, or deal with the penalties. >> So Lillian, as a consumer this is designed to protect you. But you had a very negative perception of this regulation. >> I've looked over the GDPR and to me it actually looks like a socialist agenda. It looks like (panel laughs) no, it looks like a full assault on free enterprise and capitalism. And on its' face from a legal perspective, its' completely and wholly unenforceable. Because they're assigning jurisdictional rights to the citizen. But what are they going to do? They're going to go to Nebraska and they're going to call in the guy from the pizza shop? And call him into what court? The EU court? It's unenforceable from a legal perspective. And if you write a law that's unenforceable, you know, it's got to be enforceable in every element. It can't be just, "Oh, we're only "going to enforce it for Facebook and for Google. "But it's not enforceable for," it needs to be written so that it's a complete and actionable law. And it's not written in that way. And from a technological perspective it's not implementable. I think you said something like 652 EU regulators or political people voted for this and 10 voted against it. But what do they know about actually implementing it? Is it possible? There's all sorts of regulations out there that aren't possible to implement. I come from an environmental engineering background. And it's absolutely ridiculous because these agencies will pass laws that actually, it's not possible to implement those in practice. The cost would be too great. And it's not even needed. So I don't know, I just saw this and I thought, "You know, if the EU wants to," what they're essentially trying to do is regulate what the rest of the world does on the internet. And if they want to build their own internet like China has and police it the way that they want to. But Ronald here, made an analogy between data, and free enterprise, and a crime scene. Now to me, that's absolutely ridiculous. What does data and someone signing up for an email list have to do with a crime scene? And if EU wants to make it that way they can police their own internet. But they can't go across the world. They can't go to Singapore and tell Singapore, or go to the pizza shop in Nebraska and tell them how to run their business. >> You know, EU overreach in the post Brexit era, of what you're saying has a lot of validity. How far can the tentacles of the EU reach into other sovereign nations. >> What court are they going to call them into? >> Yeah. >> I'd like to weigh in on this. There are lots of unknowns, right? So I'd like us to focus on the things we do know. We've already dealt with similar situations before. In Australia, we introduced a goods and sales tax. Completely foreign concept. Everything you bought had 10% on it. No one knew how to deal with this. It was a completely new practice in accounting. There's a whole bunch of new software that had to be written. MYRB had to have new capability, but we coped. No one actually went to jail yet. It's decades later, for not complying with GST. So what it was, was a framework on how to shift from non sales tax related revenue collection. To sales tax related revenue collection. I agree that there are some egregious things built into this. I don't disagree with that at all. But I think if I put my slightly broader view of the world hat on, we have well and truly gone past the point in my mind, where data was respected, data was treated in a sensible way. I mean I get emails from companies I've never done business with. And when I follow it up, it's because I did business with a credit card company, that gave it to a service provider, that thought that I was going to, when I bought a holiday to come to Europe, that I might want travel insurance. Now some might say there's value in that. And other's say there's not, there's the debate. But let's just focus on what we're talking about. We're talking about a framework for governance of the treatment of data. If we remove all the emotive component, what we are talking about is a series of guidelines, backed by laws, that say, "We would like you to do this," in an ideal world. But I don't think anyone's going to go to jail, on day one. They may go to jail on day 180. If they continue to do nothing about it. So they're asking you to sort of sit up and pay attention. Do something about it. There's a whole bunch of relief around how you approach it. The big thing for me, is there's no get out of jail card, right? There is no get out of jail card for not complying. But there's plenty of support. I mean, we're going to have ambulance chasers everywhere. We're going to have class actions. We're going to have individual suits. The greatest thing to do right now is get into GDPR law. Because you seem to think data scientists are unicorn? >> What kind of life is that if there's ambulance chasers everywhere? You want to live like that? >> Well I think we've seen ad blocking. I use ad blocking as an example, right? A lot of organizations with advertising broke the internet by just throwing too much content on pages, to the point where they're just unusable. And so we had this response with ad blocking. I think in many ways, GDPR is a regional response to a situation where I don't think it's the exact right answer. But it's the next evolutional step. We'll see things evolve over time. >> It's funny you mentioned it because in the United States one of the things that has happened, is that with the change in political administrations, the regulations on what companies can do with your data have actually been laxened, to the point where, for example, your internet service provider can resell your browsing history, with or without your consent. Or your consent's probably buried in there, on page 47. And so, GDPR is kind of a response to saying, "You know what? "You guys over there across the Atlantic "are kind of doing some fairly "irresponsible things with what you allow companies to do." Now, to Lillian's point, no one's probably going to go after the pizza shop in Nebraska because they don't do business in the EU. They don't have an EU presence. And it's unlikely that an EU regulator's going to get on a plane from Brussels and fly to Topeka and say, or Omaha, sorry, "Come on Joe, let's get the pizza shop in order here." But for companies, particularly Cloud companies, that have offices and operations within the EU, they have to sit up and pay attention. So if you have any kind of EU operations, or any kind of fiscal presence in the EU, you need to get on board. >> But to Lillian's point it becomes a boondoggle for lawyers in the EU who want to go after deep pocketed companies like Facebook and Google. >> What's the value in that? It seems like regulators are just trying to create work for themselves. >> What about the things that say advertisers can do, not so much with the data that they have? With the data that they don't have. In other words, they have people called data scientists who build models that can do inferences on sparse data. And do amazing things in terms of personalization. What do you do about all those gray areas? Where you got machine learning models and so forth? >> But it applies-- >> It applies to personally identifiable information. But if you have a talented enough data scientist, you don't need the PII or even the inferred characteristics. If a certain type of behavior happens on your website, for example. And this path of 17 pages almost always leads to a conversion, it doesn't matter who you are or where you're coming from. If you're a good enough data scientist, you can build a model that will track that. >> Like you know, target, infer some young woman was pregnant. And they inferred correctly even though that was never divulged. I mean, there's all those gray areas that, how can you stop that slippery slope? >> Well I'm going to weigh in really quickly. A really interesting experiment for people to do. When people get very emotional about it I say to them, "Go to Google.com, "view source, put it in seven point Courier "font in Word and count how many pages it is." I guess you can't guess how many pages? It's 52 pages of seven point Courier font, HTML to render one logo, and a search field, and a click button. Now why do we need 52 pages of HTML source code and Java script just to take a search query. Think about what's being done in that. It's effectively a mini operating system, to figure out who you are, and what you're doing, and where you been. Now is that a good or bad thing? I don't know, I'm not going to make a judgment call. But what I'm saying is we need to stop and take a deep breath and say, "Does anybody need a 52 page, "home page to take a search query?" Because that's just the tip of the iceberg. >> To that point, I like the results that Google gives me. That's why I use Google and not Bing. Because I get better search results. So, yeah, I don't mind if you mine my personal data and give me, our Facebook ads, those are the only ads, I saw in your article that GDPR is going to take out targeted advertising. The only ads in the entire world, that I like are Facebook ads. Because I actually see products I'm interested in. And I'm happy to learn about that. I think, "Oh I want to research that. "I want to see this new line of products "and what are their competitors?" And I like the targeted advertising. I like the targeted search results because it's giving me more of the information that I'm actually interested in. >> And that's exactly what it's about. You can still decide, yourself, if you want to have this targeted advertising. If not, then you don't give consent. If you like it, you give consent. So if a company gives you value, you give consent back. So it's not that it's restricting everything. It's giving consent. And I think it's similar to what happened and the same type of response, what happened, we had the Mad Cow Disease here in Europe, where you had the whole food chain that needed to be tracked. And everybody said, "No, it's not required." But now it's implemented. Everybody in Europe does it. So it's the same, what probably going to happen over here as well. >> So what does GDPR mean for data scientists? >> I think GDPR is, I think it is needed. I think one of the things that may be slowing data science down is fear. People are afraid to share their data. Because they don't know what's going to be done with it. If there are some guidelines around it that should be enforced and I think, you know, I think it's been said but as long as a company could prove that it's doing due diligence to protect your data, I think no one is going to go to jail. I think when there's, you know, we reference a crime scene, if there's a heinous crime being committed, all right, then it's going to become obvious. And then you do go directly to jail. But I think having guidelines and even laws around privacy and protection of data is not necessarily a bad thing. You can do a lot of data, really meaningful data science, without understanding that it's Joe Caserta. All of the demographics about me. All of the characteristics about me as a human being, I think are still on the table. All that they're saying is that you can't go after Joe, himself, directly. And I think that's okay. You know, there's still a lot of things. We could still cure diseases without knowing that I'm Joe Caserta, right? As long as you know everything else about me. And I think that's really at the core, that's what we're trying to do. We're trying to protect the individual and the individual's data about themselves. But I think as far as how it affects data science, you know, a lot of our clients, they're afraid to implement things because they don't exactly understand what the guideline is. And they don't want to go to jail. So they wind up doing nothing. So now that we have something in writing that, at least, it's something that we can work towards, I think is a good thing. >> In many ways, organizations are suffering from the deer in the headlight problem. They don't understand it. And so they just end up frozen in the headlights. But I just want to go back one step if I could. We could get really excited about what it is and is not. But for me, the most critical thing there is to remember though, data breaches are happening. There are over 1,400 data breaches, on average, per day. And most of them are not trivial. And when we saw 1/2 a billion from Yahoo. And then one point one billion and then one point five billion. I mean, think about what that actually means. There were 47,500 Mongodbs breached in an 18 hour window, after an automated upgrade. And they were airlines, they were banks, they were police stations. They were hospitals. So when I think about frameworks like GDPR, I'm less worried about whether I'm going to see ads and be sold stuff. I'm more worried about, and I'll give you one example. My 12 year old son has an account at a platform called Edmodo. Now I'm not going to pick on that brand for any reason but it's a current issue. Something like, I think it was like 19 million children in the world had their username, password, email address, home address, and all this social interaction on this Facebook for kids platform called Edmodo, breached in one night. Now I got my hands on a copy. And everything about my son is there. Now I have a major issue with that. Because I can't do anything to undo that, nothing. The fact that I was able to get a copy, within hours on a dark website, for free. The fact that his first name, last name, email, mobile phone number, all these personal messages from friends. Nobody has the right to allow that to breach on my son. Or your children, or our children. For me, GDPR, is a framework for us to try and behave better about really big issues. Whether it's a socialist issue. Whether someone's got an issue with advertising. I'm actually not interested in that at all. What I'm interested in is companies need to behave much better about the treatment of data when it's the type of data that's being breached. And I get really emotional when it's my son, or someone else's child. Because I don't care if my bank account gets hacked. Because they hedge that. They underwrite and insure themselves and the money arrives back to my bank. But when it's my wife who donated blood and a blood donor website got breached and her details got lost. Even things like sexual preferences. That they ask questions on, is out there. My 12 year old son is out there. Nobody has the right to allow that to happen. For me, GDPR is the framework for us to focus on that. >> Dave: Lillian, is there a comment you have? >> Yeah, I think that, I think that security concerns are 100% and definitely a serious issue. Security needs to be addressed. And I think a lot of the stuff that's happening is due to, I think we need better security personnel. I think we need better people working in the security area where they're actually looking and securing. Because I don't think you can regulate I was just, I wanted to take the microphone back when you were talking about taking someone to jail. Okay, I have a background in law. And if you look at this, you guys are calling it a framework. But it's not a framework. What they're trying to do is take 4% of your business revenues per infraction. They want to say, "If a person signs up "on your email list and you didn't "like, necessarily give whatever "disclaimer that the EU said you need to give. "Per infraction, we're going to take "4% of your business revenue." That's a law, that they're trying to put into place. And you guys are talking about taking people to jail. What jail are you? EU is not a country. What jurisdiction do they have? Like, you're going to take pizza man Joe and put him in the EU jail? Is there an EU jail? Are you going to take them to a UN jail? I mean, it's just on its' face it doesn't hold up to legal tests. I don't understand how they could enforce this. >> I'd like to just answer the question on-- >> Security is a serious issue. I would be extremely upset if I were you. >> I personally know, people who work for companies who've had data breaches. And I respect them all. They're really smart people. They've got 25 plus years in security. And they are shocked that they've allowed a breach to take place. What they've invariably all agreed on is that a whole range of drivers have caused them to get to a bad practice. So then, for example, the donate blood website. The young person who was assist admin with all the right skills and all the right experience just made a basic mistake. They took a db dump of a mysql database before they upgraded their Wordpress website for the business. And they happened to leave it in a folder that was indexable by Google. And so somebody wrote a radio expression to search in Google to find sql backups. Now this person, I personally respect them. I think they're an amazing practitioner. They just made a mistake. So what does that bring us back to? It brings us back to the point that we need a safety net or a framework or whatever you want to call it. Where organizations have checks and balances no matter what they do. Whether it's an upgrade, a backup, a modification, you know. And they all think they do, but invariably we've seen from the hundreds of thousands of breaches, they don't. Now on the point of law, we could debate that all day. I mean the EU does have a remit. If I was caught speeding in Germany, as an Australian, I would be thrown into a German jail. If I got caught as an organization in France, breaching GDPR, I would be held accountable to the law in that region, by the organization pursuing me. So I think it's a bit of a misnomer saying I can't go to an EU jail. I don't disagree with you, totally, but I think it's regional. If I get a speeding fine and break the law of driving fast in EU, it's in the country, in the region, that I'm caught. And I think GDPR's going to be enforced in that same approach. >> All right folks, unfortunately the 60 minutes flew right by. And it does when you have great guests like yourselves. So thank you very much for joining this panel today. And we have an action packed day here. So we're going to cut over. The CUBE is going to have its' interview format starting in about 1/2 hour. And then we cut over to the main tent. Who's on the main tent? Dez, you're doing a main stage presentation today. Data Science is a Team Sport. Hillary Mason, has a breakout session. We also have a breakout session on GDPR and what it means for you. Are you ready for GDPR? Check out ibmgo.com. It's all free content, it's all open. You do have to sign in to see the Hillary Mason and the GDPR sessions. And we'll be back in about 1/2 hour with the CUBE. We'll be running replays all day on SiliconAngle.tv and also ibmgo.com. So thanks for watching everybody. Keep it right there, we'll be back in about 1/2 hour with the CUBE interviews. We're live from Munich, Germany, at Fast Track Your Data. This is Dave Vellante with Jim Kobielus, we'll see you shortly. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by IBM. Really good to see you in Munich. a lot of people to organize and talk about data science. And so, I want to start with sort of can really grasp the concepts I present to them. But I don't know if there's anything you would add? So I'd love to take any questions you have how to get, turn data into value So one of the things, Adam, the reason I'm going to introduce Ronald Van Loon. And on the other hand I'm a blogger I met you on Twitter, you know, and the pace of change, that's just You're in the front lines, helping organizations, Trying to govern when you have And newest member of the SiliconANGLE Media Team. and data science are at the heart of it. It's funny that you excluded deep learning of the workflow of data science And I haven't seen the industry automation, in terms of the core And baking it right into the tools. that's really powering a lot of the rapid leaps forward. What's the distinction? It's like asking people to mine classifieds. to layer, and what you end up with the ability to do higher levels of abstraction. get the result, you also have to And I guess the last part is, Dave: So I'd like to switch gears a little bit and just generally in the community, And this means that it has to be brought on one end to, But Chris you have a-- Look at the major breaches of the last couple years. "I have to spend to protect myself, And that's the way I think about it. and the data are the models themselves. And I think that it's very undisciplined right now, So that you can sell more. And a lot of times they can't fund these transformations. But the first question I like to ask people And then figure out how you map data to it. And after the month, you check, kind of a data broker, the business case rarely So initially, indeed, they don't like to use the data. But do you have anything to add? and deploy it in more areas of the business. There's the whole issue of putting And it's a lot cheaper to store data And then start to build some fully is that the speed to value is just the data and someone else has to manage the problem. So, you know, think of it in terms on that theme, when you think about from IDC that says, "About 43% of the data all aircraft and all carriers have to be, most of the deep learning models like TensorFlow geared to IOT, I'm sorry, go ahead. I mean in the announcement of having "lift and shift to the Cloud." And only the metadata that we need And you can push that to a device. And it could be that you got to I'd like somebody in the panel to And on the other hand, you see that But fill in some of the gaps there. And the right to data transfer. a good chunk of that may have to go away So Lillian, as a consumer this is designed to protect you. I've looked over the GDPR and to me You know, EU overreach in the post Brexit era, But I don't think anyone's going to go to jail, on day one. And so we had this response with ad blocking. And so, GDPR is kind of a response to saying, a boondoggle for lawyers in the EU What's the value in that? With the data that they don't have. leads to a conversion, it doesn't matter who you are And they inferred correctly even to figure out who you are, and what you're doing, And I like the targeted advertising. And I think it's similar to what happened I think no one is going to go to jail. and the money arrives back to my bank. "disclaimer that the EU said you need to give. I would be extremely upset if I were you. And I think GDPR's going to be enforced in that same approach. And it does when you have great guests like yourselves.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jim Kobielus | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Floyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ronald | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lillian Pierson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lillian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joe Caserta | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nebraska | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Hillary Mason | PERSON | 0.99+ |
87,400 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Topeka | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Airbus | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Brussels | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
EU | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dez Blanchfield | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Penn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Omaha | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Munich | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
May of 2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
May 25th 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Sydney | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
nine | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Germany | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
17 pages | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Joe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$89 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Yahoo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
France | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
June 18 | DATE | 0.99+ |
83, 81,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ronald Van Loon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
USA | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Greg Benson, SnapLogic - AWS Summit SF 2017 - #AWSSummit - #theCUBE
>> Voiceover: Live from San Francisco it's theCUBE. Covering AWS Summit 2017. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. (upbeat music) >> Hey welcome back to theCUBE live at the Moscone Center at the Amazon Web Services Summit San Francisco. Very excited to be here, my co-host Jeff Rick. We're now talking to the Chief Scientist and professor at University of San Francisco, Greg Benson of SnapLogic. Greg, welcome to theCUBE, this is your first time here we're excited to have you. >> Thanks for having me. >> Lisa: So talk to us about what SnapLogic is, what do you do, and what did announce recently, today, with Amazon Web Services? >> Greg: Sure, so SnapLogic is a data integration company. We deliver a cloud-native product that allows companies to easily connect their different data sources and cloud applications to enrich their business processes and really make some of their business processes a lot easier. We have a very easy-to-use what we call self-service interface. So previously a lot of the things that people would have to do is hire programmers and do lots of manual programming to achieve some of the same things that they can do with our product. And we have a nice drag-and-drop. We call it digital programming interface to achieve this. And along those lines, I've been working for the last two years on ways to make that experience even easier than it already is. And because we're Cloud-based, because we have access to all of the types of problems that our customers run into, and the solutions that they solve with our product, we can now leverage that, and use it to harness machine-learning. We call this technology Iris, is what we're calling it. And so we've built out this entire meta-data framework that allows us to do data science on all of our meta-data in a very iterative and rapid fashion. And then we look for patterns, we look for historical data that we can learn from. And then what we do is we use that to train machinery and algorithms, in order to improve the customer experience in some way. When they're trying to achieve a task, specifically the first product feature that is based on the Iris technology is called the Integration Assistant. And the Integration Assistant is a very practical tool that is involved in the process of actually building out these pipelines. We call, when you build a pipeline it consists of these things called snaps, right? Snaps encapsulate functionality and then you can connect these snaps together. Now, it's often challenging when you have a problem to figure, OK, it's like a puzzle what snaps do I put together, and when do I put them together? Well, now that we've been doing this for a little while and we have quite a few customers with quite a few pipelines, we have a lot of knowledge about how people have solved those puzzles in the past. So, what we've done with Iris, is we've learned from all of those past solutions and now we give you automatic suggestions on where you might want to head next. And, we're getting pretty good accuracy for what we're predicting. So, we're basically, and this integration system is, a recommendation engine for connecting snaps into your pipelines as they're developing. So it's a real-time assistant. >> Jeff: So if I'm getting this right, it's really the intelligence of the crowd and the fact that you have so many customers that are executing many of the similar, same processes that you use as the basis to start to build the machine-learning to learn the best practices to make suggestions as people are going through this on their own. >> Greg: That's absolutely right. And furthermore, not only can we generalize from all of our customers to help new customers take advantage of this past knowledge, but what we can also do is tailor the suggestions for specific companies. So as you, as a company, as you start to build out more solutions that are specific to your problems, your different integration problems... >> Jeff: Right. >> The algorithms can now be, can learn from those specific things. So we both generalize and then we also make the work that you're doing easier within your company. >> And what's the specific impact? Are there any samples, stories you can share of what is the result of this type of activity? >> Greg: We're just, we're releasing it in May. >> Jeff: Oh OK. >> So it's going to be generally available to customers. >> Couple weeks still. >> Greg: Yeah. So... So... And... So... So we've done internal tests, so we've dove both through sort of the data science, so the experimentation to see, to feed it and get the feedback around how accurately it works. But we've also done user studies and what the user studies, not only did the science show but the user studies show that it can improve the time to completion of these pipelines, as you're building them. >> Lisa: So talk to us a little bit about who your target audience is. We're AWS, as we said. They really started 10 years ago in the start of space and have grown tremendous at getting to enterprise. Who is the target audience for SnapLogic that you're going after to help them really significantly improve their infrastructure get to the cloud, and beyond? >> Greg: So, so, so basically, we work with, largely with IT organizations within enterprises, who are, you know, larger companies are tasked with having sort of a common fabric for connecting, you know, which in an organization is lots of different databases for different purposes, ERP systems, you know, now, increasingly, lots of cloud applications and that's where part of our target is, we work with a lot of companies that still have policies where of course their data must be behind their firewall and maybe even on their premise, so our technology, while we're... we're hosted and run in the cloud, and we get the advantage of the SAS, a SAS platform, we also have the ability to run behind a firewall, and execute these data pipelines in the security domains of the customers themselves. So, they get the advantage of SAS, they get the advantage of things like Iris, and the Integration Assistant, right, because we can leverage all of the knowledge, but they get to adhere to any, you know, any regulatory or security policies that they have. And we don't have to see their data or touch their data. >> Lisa: So helping a customer that was, you know, using a service-oriented architecture or an ETL, modernize their infrastructure? >> Greg: Oh it's completely about modernization. Yeah, I mean, we, you know, our CEO, Gaurav Dhillon has been in the space for a while. He was formerly the CEO of Informatica. And so he has a lot of experience. And when he set out to start SnapLogic he wanted to look, you know, embrace the technologies of the time, right? So we're web-focused, right? We're HTTP and REST and JSON data. And we've centered the core technologies around these modern principles. So that makes us work very well with all the modern applications that you see today. >> Jeff: Look Greg, I want to shift gears a little bit. >> Greg: Yeah. >> You're also a professor. >> Greg: Correct. >> At University of San Francisco and UC Davis. I'd just love to get your perspective from the academic side of the house on what's happening at schools, around this new opportunity with big data, machine-learning, and AI and how that world is kind of changing? And then you are sitting in this great position where you kind of cross-over both... How does that really benefit, you know, to have some of that fresh, young blood, and learning, and then really take that back over, back into the other side of the house? >> Greg: Yeah, so a couple of things. Yeah, professor at University of San Francisco for 19 years. I did my PhD at UC Davis in computer science. And... My background is research in operating systems, parallel and distributed computing, in recent years, big data frameworks, big data processing. And University of San Francisco, itself, we have a, what we call the Senior and Masters Project Programs. Where, we've been doing this for, ever since I've been at USF, where what we do is we partner groups of students with outside sponsors, who are looking for opportunities to explore a research area. Maybe one that they can't allocate, you know, they can't justify allocating funds for, because it's a little bit outside of the main product, right? And so... It's a great win, 'cause our students get experience with a San Francisco, Silicon Valley company, right? So it helps their resume. It enhances their university experience, right? And because, you know, a lot of research happens in academia and computer science but a lot of research is also happening in industry, which is a really fascinating thing, if you look at what has come out of some of the bigger companies around here. And we feel like we're doing the same thing at SnapLogic and at the University of San Francisco. So just to kind of close that loop, students are great because they're not constrained by, maybe, some of us who have been in the industry for a while, about maybe what is possible and what's no so possible. And it's great to have somebody come and look at a problem and say, "You know, I think we could approach this differently." And, in fact, really, the impetus for the Integration Assistant came out of one of these projects where I pitched to our students, and I said "OK, we're going to explore SnapLogic meta-data and we're going to look at ways we can leverage machine-learning in the product on this data." But I left it kind of vague, kind of open. This fantastic student of mine from Thailand, his name is Jump, he kind of, he spent some time looking at the data and he actually said, "You know I'm seeing some patterns here. I'm seeing that, you know, we've got this great repository of these," like I described, "of these solved puzzles. And I think we could use that to train some algorithms." And so we spent, in the project phase, as part of his coursework, he worked on this technology. Then we demoed it at the company. The company said, "Wow, this is great technology. Let's put this into production." And then, there was kind of this transition from sort of this more academic, sort of experimental project into, going with engineers and making it a real feature. >> Lisa: What a great opportunity though, not just for the student to get more real-world applicability, like you're saying, taking it from that very experimental, investigational, academic approach and seeing all of the components within a business, that student probably gets so much more out of just an experiment. But your other point is very valid of having that younger talent that maybe doesn't have a lot of the biases and the pre-conceived notions that those of us that have been in the industry for a while. That's a great pipeline, no pun intended... >> Greg: Sure. >> For SnapLogic, is that something that you helped bring into the company by nature of being a professor? Just sort of a nice by-product? >> Well, so a couple of things there. One is that, like I said, University of San Francisco we were running this project class for a while, and... I got involved, you know, I had been at USF for a long time before I got involved with SnapLogic. I was introduced to Gaurav and there was this opportunity. And initially, right, initially, I was looking to apply some of my research to the technology, their product and their technology. But then it became clear that hey, you know we have this infrastructure in place at the university, they go through the academic training, our students are, it's a very rigorous program, back to your point about what they are exposed to, we have, you know, we're very modern, around big data, machine-learning, and then all of the core computer science that you would expect from a program. And so, yeah, it's been... It's been a great mutually beneficial relationship with SnapLogic and the students. But many other companies also come and pitch projects and those students also do similar types of projects at other companies. I would like to say that I started it at USF but I didn't. It was in existence. But I helped carry it forward. >> Jeff: That's great. >> Lisa: That is fantastic. >> And even before we got started, I mean you said your kind of attitude was to be the iPhone in this space. >> Greg: Of integration, yeah. >> Jeff: So again, taking a very different approach a really modern approach, to the expected behavior of things is very different. And you know, the consumerization of IT in terms of the expected behavior of how we interact with stuff has been such a powerful driver in the development of all these different applications. It's pretty amazing. >> Greg: And I think, you know, just like maybe, now you couldn't imagine most sort-of consumer-facing products not having a mobile application of some sort, increasingly what you're seeing is applications will require machine-learning, right, will require some amount of augmented intelligence. And I would go as far to say that the technology that we're doing at SnapLogic with self-service integration is also going to be a requirement. That, you just can't think of self-service integration without having it powered by a machine-learning framework helping you, right? It almost, like, in a few years we won't imagine it any other way. >> Lisa: And I like the analogy that Jeff, you just brought up, Greg, the being the iPhone of data integration. The simplicity message, something that was very prevalent today at the keynote, about making things simpler, faster, enabling more. And it sounds like that's what you're leveraging computer science to do. So, Greg Benson, Chief Scientist at SnapLogic. Thank you so much for being on theCUBE, you're now CUBE alumni, so that's fantastic. >> Alright. >> Lisa: We appreciate you being here and we appreciate you watching. For my co-host Jeff Rick, I'm Lisa Martin, again we are live from the AWS Summit in San Francisco. Stick around, we'll be right back. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. live at the Moscone Center at the and now we give you automatic suggestions and the fact that you have so many customers that are more solutions that are specific to your problems, make the work that you're doing easier so the experimentation to see, to feed it Lisa: So talk to us a little bit about but they get to adhere to any, you know, any regulatory all the modern applications that you see today. How does that really benefit, you know, And because, you know, a lot of research happens not just for the student to get more real-world we have, you know, we're very modern, And even before we got started, I mean you said And you know, the consumerization of IT Greg: And I think, you know, just like maybe, And it sounds like that's what you're leveraging and we appreciate you watching.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Greg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Greg Benson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gaurav Dhillon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
SnapLogic | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
19 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Informatica | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
UC Davis | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
University of San Francisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Moscone Center | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Gaurav | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Jump | PERSON | 0.98+ |
AWS Summit | EVENT | 0.97+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
#AWSSummit | EVENT | 0.94+ |
AWS Summit 2017 | EVENT | 0.93+ |
Amazon Web Services Summit | EVENT | 0.93+ |
Couple weeks | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
USF | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Iris | TITLE | 0.92+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
first product feature | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
AWS Summit SF 2017 | EVENT | 0.87+ |
last two years | DATE | 0.83+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
JSON | OTHER | 0.76+ |
Iris | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
REST | OTHER | 0.67+ |
one of these | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
Harriet Green, IBM - IBM Interconnect 2017 - #ibminterconnect - #theCUBE
(upbeat music) >> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas. It's The Cube. Covering Interconnect 2017. Brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back everyone. We are here and live in Las Vegas. This is The Cube's coverage of IBM's Interconnect 2017. Three days of wall to wall coverage. Day two here. I'm John Furrier with my co-host Dave Vellante. Our next guest is Harriet Green, General Manager of Watson IoT, a Cube alumni. Great to see you again. Thanks for coming on The Cube this year again, appreciate it. >> Oh it's my pleasure. I hope we're going to talk about Internet of Things, what's in customer engagement and education. Those are things that we hope to talk about. >> Congratulations. You guys have an IoT center now in Munich. You guys had that big launch there, but the real thing that's happening in context if you could zoom out on this is that we're seeing the trend of cloud and big data world being kind of accelerated together and IoT seems to be the center point of the action because it's industrial, it's business, it's people, it's cars, it's the world now. The data piece of it is really accelerating. Now combine that with machine learning, and the glam of AI, the sizzle of artificial intelligence and cognitive really kind of puts that at the center of the conversation. This is transformative. >> Oh totally and I mean you guys were at the Genius of Things so you know that there were 600 Cs: COs, Chief Innovation Officers, Chief Digital Officers from 400 different companies, accounting for about two trillion of revenues. You're exactly right. It's across every major industry, every major sector. I think there are kind of three critical elements. The first is that with the whole proliferation of sensors and the cost points, etcetera, the amount of data and information that is being created is absolutely suited for Watson. So all of those clients there, as you know, are working with us and we shared 22 major outcomes: things faster, cheaper, better, that clients are actually experiencing. Watson is the differentiator and from an IoT perspective, I think the other piece is for a very long time IBM has proven that we respect and keep people's data perfectly safe. We don't use it, we don't open it, we don't go into it, we're not taking it for a future world of knowledge graph. We consider client's data to be their DNA. People know that when you're doing IoT with IBM that deep level of security is imbued within our capability. Then thirdly, who's data is it? Which is a huge thing in Europe and we're able with our data centers to demonstrate if you want to keep that data within lower Bavaria, that's what we'll do. And those three elements, I think, are fundamental; cognitive, the protection of the data, and who's data is it? >> 'Cause who owns the data is really important. It's a big differentiator because the data informs the model. They're almost intertwined so who owns the model? The client owns the model? Is that correct? >> Yeah, but I think people have over-complicated this, those who perhaps do not have such a simple and clear answer to it. Who don't have written into their terms and conditions that it's actually their data and they can hang onto it for as long as they like. We have always to our clients said it's your data. It's absolutely your data. If we create something together with your data, it's still your data. People only start to confuse this when they have primary and secondary and tertiary levels of confusion to support their particular cause. There is no confusion with our clients. When you talk to the chief digital officers of Shaeffler, of ISS, of SNCF who are up on stage with us yesterday, people who are demonstrating amazing outcomes that they didn't have before with IoT, they will say to you there are three reasons why we went with IBM. The first, the platform. It is the best IoT platform. From an IDC, from a Gottner perspective that's what Forester, what the guys say. Secondly, our applications are very robust and help people get started on this IoT journey. Thirdly, that the digital transformation that is happening alongside this, back to your convergence point, we're also able to assist with our GPS IoT practice. >> And you're accelerating that too. Ginni Rometty on stage talking about how that Watson's learning faster by industry but it's not a silo thing. It's actually accelerating the transformation components. >> Well, you put your finger on that precisely because the amazing thing about the Internet of Things is it's not just consumer, it's not just one industry. We're interfacing 34 different industries who are represented at the Genius of Things. It's also affecting life. Yesterday you may have seen ISS and their amazing building that they've created, which now as you arrive at terminal five, wherever it is, a huge rush and suddenly the elevators don't work. Remotely these elevators are being fixed and the journey is absolutely amazing. It is kind of is industry. >> That social good angle is important is the cognitive for social good trend going on right now culturally. That's really important. But I want to ask you- >> But I do think on the ... Ginni announced in Davos our cognitive principle. There's no client working with us that doesn't know we're working from a cognitive perspective. We go to great levels to explain what we are doing, to whom it belongs and that charter is not something that we just came up with. That's IBM for 105 years. It's why I chose to come here around the Internet of Things. >> It's super inspirational for me personally and I want to ask you about a topic that's passionate for us as an organization. We've had the largest library of women in tech, going back to 2010, we've been interviewing some of the great leaders in the tech industry. This is really now going really amazing. You heard Mark Benning up on stage talking about all the goodness going on around equality and pay, everything else going on but there's more women now instrumental in all the computer science and business side. How are you continuing that? We talked a little bit about this last year with the mentoring. How do you attract the talent? How do you get that inspiration for the young women and girls out there from whether grade school, high school, college? What's the plan? >> Well, first of all I think IBM has on every level a proven history of diversity. 35 years before the equal pay act we were equal paying. We have an incredibly diverse cultural environment where regardless of your age, your sex, your color, your creed, your sexuality, or your physical ability if you're good you'll get on. IBM lives and breathes that in every sense. Now I think the challenge is in North America particularly, in the 80s 30% of young women were going into the STEM subjects and now it's dropped just below 18%. I think it's absolutely critical that investors in companies are thinking about this equality and measuring the power of diversity and innovation. That leaders inside of businesses do more than just pontificate on stage but live on breath it. as Ginni >> Walk the talk. >> Harriet: Does. And then also that all of us in our decision making, particularly, I did for International Women's Week last week a whole webx around inclusion and how we include, how we exclude, and I shared a particular story of a couple of weeks ago some said to me you're just such a left field candidate, Harriet. And maybe that's a compliment. He happens to be a very nice guy and maybe he's right but we want people to feel inclusive. One of the most amazing things that IBM has done for some time which is almost unique, up there with Watson, is we do this to attract millennials particularly, but anyone can participate. It's a program where we take people who go in a totally immersive six or seven weeks. It may be human trafficking in Thailand. It may be helping to train and educate in sub-Saharan Africa and they work with local bodies, local institutions, really helps build this collaborative capability. And then all of the work we're doing with Ptech around up-skilling and ensuring that the STEM subjects from a very wide range of young people are really embraced. >> Harriet, you're getting requested 'cause you got to move around the events so many places and your time is very scarce and you have to move to the next event. Thank you for taking the time to share that with us and also the awesomeness around IoT and Watson. Appreciate and good to see you. You look great. This is IBM Interconnect. Harriet Green the leader of Watson IoT Customer Engagement and Support. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante. We'll be right back with more after this short break. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by IBM. Great to see you again. Those are things that we hope to talk about. and the glam of AI, the sizzle of artificial intelligence at the Genius of Things so you know that there were 600 Cs: because the data informs the model. Thirdly, that the digital transformation It's actually accelerating the transformation components. and the journey is absolutely amazing. That social good angle is important is the cognitive and that charter is not something that we just came up with. We've had the largest library of women in tech, in the 80s 30% of young women were going into One of the most amazing things that IBM has done and also the awesomeness around IoT and Watson.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Harriet | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Harriet Green | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mark Benning | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thailand | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Munich | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
SNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
105 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
International Women's Week | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Ginni | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ISS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ginni Rometty | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Watson IoT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
600 Cs | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bavaria | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three elements | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ptech | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
400 different companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Three days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.98+ |
34 different industries | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Watson | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Yesterday | DATE | 0.98+ |
three reasons | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about two trillion | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
Secondly | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
80s | DATE | 0.96+ |
Thirdly | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
sub-Saharan Africa | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
three critical elements | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Interconnect 2017 | EVENT | 0.93+ |
Watson | TITLE | 0.92+ |
35 years | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
22 major outcomes | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
couple of weeks ago | DATE | 0.9+ |
IBM Interconnect | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
The Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
one industry | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
below 18% | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
Genius of | ORGANIZATION | 0.74+ |
Genius of Things | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
Davos | LOCATION | 0.7+ |
Watson | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
#ibminterconnect | EVENT | 0.64+ |
Gottner | PERSON | 0.61+ |
Shaeffler | ORGANIZATION | 0.58+ |
terminal five | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
equal | TITLE | 0.5+ |
Forester | PERSON | 0.48+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.38+ |