Yousef Khalidi, Microsoft & Dennis Hoffman, Dell Technologies | MWC Barcelona 2023
>> Narrator: theCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies, creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat music) >> Welcome back to the Fira in Barcelona. This is Dave Vellante with David Nicholson. Lisa Martin is also here. This is day two of our coverage of MWC 23 on theCUBE. We're super excited. We're in between hall four and five. Stop by if you're here. Dennis Hoffman is here. He's the senior vice president and general manager of the Telecom systems business at Dell Technologies, and he's joined by Yousef Khalidi, who's the corporate vice president of Azure for Operators from Microsoft. Gents, Welcome. >> Thanks, Dave. >> Thank you. >> So we saw Satya in the keynote. He wired in. We saw T.K. came in. No AWS. I don't know. They're maybe not part of the show, but maybe next year they'll figure it out. >> Indeed, indeed. >> Lots of stuff happened in the Telecom, but the Azure operator distributed service is the big news, you guys got here. What's that all about? >> Oh, first of all, we changed the name. >> Oh, you did? >> You did? >> Oh, yeah. We have a real name now. It's called the Azure Operator Nexus. >> Oh, I like Nexus better than that. >> David: That's much better, much better. >> Dave: The engineers named it first time around. >> I wish, long story, but thank you for our marketing team. But seriously, not only did we rename the platform, we expanded the platform. >> Dave: Yeah. >> So it now covers the whole spectrum from the far-edge to the public cloud as well, including the near-edge as well. So essentially, it's a hybrid platform that can also run network functions. So all these operators around you, they now have a platform which combines cloud technologies with the choice where they want to run, optimized for the network. >> Okay and so, you know, we've talked about the disaggregation of the network and how you're bringing kind of engineered systems to the table. We've seen this movie before, but Dennis, there are differences, right? I mean, you didn't really have engineered systems in the 90s. You didn't have those integration points. You really didn't have the public cloud, you didn't have AI. >> Right. >> So you have all those new powers that you can tap, so give us the update from your perspective, having now spent a day and a half here. What's the vibe, what's the buzz, and what's your take on everything? >> Yeah, I think to build on what Yousef said, there's a lot going on with people still trying to figure out exactly how to architect the Telecom network of the future. They know it's got to have a lot to do with cloud. It does have some pretty significant differences, one of those being, there's definitely got to be a hybrid component because there are pieces of the Telecom network that even when modernized will not end up centralized, right? They're going to be highly distributed. I would say though, you know, we took away two things, yesterday, from all the meetings. One, people are done, I think the network operators are done, questioning technology readiness. They're now beginning to wrestle with operationalization of it all, right? So it's like, okay, it's here. I can in fact build a modern network in a very cloud native way, but I've got to figure out how to do that all. And another big part of it is the ecosystem and certainly the partnership long standing between Dell and Microsoft which we're extending into this space is part of that, making it easier on people to actually acquire, deploy, and importantly, support these new technologies. >> So a lot of the traditional carriers, like you said, they're sort of beyond the technology readiness. Jose Maria Alvarez in the keynote said there are three pillars to the future Telecom network. He said low latency, programmable networks, and then cloud and edge, kind of threw that in. You agree with that, Yousef? (Dave and Yousef speaking altogether) >> I mean, we've been for years talking about the cloud and edge. >> Yeah. >> Satya for years had the same graphic. We still have it. Today, we have expanded the graphic a bit to include the network as one, because you can have a cloud without connectivity as well but this is very, very, very, very much true. >> And so the question then, Dennis, is okay, you've got disruptors, we had Dish on yesterday. >> Oh, did you? Good. >> Yeah, yeah, and they're talking about what they're doing with, you know, ORAN and all the applications, really taking account of it. What I see is a developer friendly, you know, environment. You got the carriers talking about how they're going to charge developers for APIs. I think they've published eight APIs which is nowhere near enough. So you've got that sort of, you know, inertia and yet, you have the disruptors that are going to potentially be a catalyst to, you know, cross the chasm, if you will. So, you know, put on your strategy hat. >> Yeah. >> Dave: How do you see that playing out? >> Well, they're trying to tap into three things, the disruptors. You know, I think the thesis is, "If I get to a truly cloud native, communications network first, I ought to have greater agility so that I can launch more services and create more revenue streams. I ought to be lower cost in terms of both acquisition cost and operating cost, right, and I ought to be able to create scale between my IT organization, everything I know how to do there and my Telecom network." You know, classic, right? Better, faster, cheaper if I embrace cloud early on. And people like Dish, you know, they have a clean sheet of paper with which to do that. So innovation and rate of innovation is huge for them. >> So what would you do? We put your Clay Christensen hat on, now. What if you were at a traditional Telco who's like, complaining about- >> You're going to get me in trouble. >> Dave: Come on, come on. >> Don't do it. >> Dave: Help him out. Help him out, help him out. So if, you know, they're complaining about CapEx, they're highly regulated, right, they want net neutrality but they want to be able to sort of dial up the cost of those using the network. So what would you do? Would you try to disrupt yourself? Would you create a skunkworks? Would you kind of spin off a disruptor? That's a real dilemma for those guys. >> Well for mobile network operators, the beauty of 5G is it's the first cloud native cellular standard. So I don't know if anybody's throwing these terms around, but 5G SA is standalone, right? >> Dave: Yeah, yeah. >> So a lot of 'em, it's not a skunkworks. They're just literally saying, "I've got to have a 5G network." And some of 'em are deciding, "I'm going to stand it up all by itself." Now, that's duplicative expense in a lot of ways, but it creates isolation from the two networks. Others are saying, "No, it's got to be NSA. I've got to be able to combine 4G and 5G." And then you're into the brownfield thing. >> That's the hybrid. >> Not hybrid as in cloud, but hybrid as in, you know. >> Yeah, yeah. >> It's a converge network. >> Dave: Yeah, yeah. >> So, you know, I would say for a lot of them, they're adopting, probably rightly so, a wait and see attitude. One thing we haven't talked about and you got to get on the table, their high order bit is resilience. >> Dave: Yeah, totally. >> David: Yeah. >> Right? Can't go down. It's national, secure infrastructure, first responder. >> Indeed. >> Anytime you ask them to embrace any new technology, the first thing that they have to work through in their minds is, you know, "Is the juice worth the squeeze? Like, can I handle the risk?" >> But you're saying they're not questioning the technology. Aren't they questioning ORAN in terms of the quality of service, or are they beyond that? >> Dennis: They're questioning the timing, not the inevitability. >> Okay, so they agree that ORAN is going to be open over time. >> At some point, RAN will be cloud native, whether it's ORAN the spec, open RAN the concept, (Yousef speaking indistinctly) >> Yeah. >> Virtual RAN. But yeah, I mean I think it seems pretty evident at this point that the mainframe will give way to open systems once again. >> Dave: Yeah, yeah, yeah. >> ERAN, ecosystem RAN. >> Any RAN. (Dave laughing) >> You don't have to start with the ORAN where they're inside the house. So as you probably know, our partner AT&T started with the core. >> Dennis: They almost all have. >> And they've been on the virtualization path since 2014 and 15. And what we are working with them on is the hybrid cloud model to expand all the way, if you will, as I mentioned to the far-edge or the public cloud. So there's a way to be in the brownfield environment, yet jump on the new bandwagon of technology without necessarily taking too much risk, because you're quite right. I mean, resiliency, security, service assurance, I mean, for example, AT&T runs the first responder network for the US on their network, on our platform, and I'm personally very familiar of how high the bar is. So it's doable, but you need to go in stages, of course. >> And they've got to do that integration. >> Yes. >> They do. >> And Yousef made a great point. Like, out of the top 30 largest Telcos by CapEx outside of China, three quarters of them have virtualized their core. So the cloudification, if you will, software definition run on industry standard hardware, embraced cloud native principles, containerized apps, that's happened in the core. It's well accepted. Now it's just a ripple-down through the network which will happen as and when things are faster, better, cheaper. >> Right. >> So as implemented, what does this look like? Is it essentially what we used to loosely refer to as Azure stacked software, running with Dell optimized Telecom infrastructure together, sometimes within a BBU, out in a hybrid cloud model communicating back to Azure locations in some cases? Is that what we're looking at? >> Approximately. So you start with the near-edge, okay? So the near-edge lives in the operator's data centers, edges, whatever the case may be, built out of off the shelf hardware. Dell is our great partner there but in principle, it could be different mix and match. So once you have that true near-edge, then you can think of, "Okay, how can I make sure this environment is as uniform, same APIs, same everything, regardless what the physical location is?" And this is key, key for the network function providers and the NEPs because they need to be able to port once, run everywhere, and it's key for the operator to reduce their costs. You want to teach your workforce, your operations folks, if you will, how to manage this system one time, to automation and so forth. So, and that is actually an expansion of the Azure capabilities that people are familiar with in a public cloud, projected into different locations. And we have technology called Arc which basically models everything. >> Yeah, yeah. >> So if you have trained your IT side, you are halfway there, how to manage your new network. Even though of course the network is carrier graded, there's different gear. So yes, what you said, a lot of it is true but the actual components, whatever they might be running, are carrier grade, highly optimized, the next images and our solution is not a DIY solution, okay? I know you cater to a wide spectrum here but for us, we don't believe in the TCO. The proper TCO can be achieved by just putting stuff by yourself. We just published a report with Analysys Mason that shows that our approach will save 36 percent of the cost compared to a DIY approach. >> Dave: What percent? >> 36 percent. >> Dave: Of the cost? >> Of, compared to DIY, which is already cheaper than classical models. >> And there's a long history of fairly failed DIY, right, >> Yeah. >> That preceded this. As in the early days of public cloud, the network operators wrestled with, "Do I have to become one to survive?" >> Dave: Yeah. Right. >> So they all ended up having cloud projects and by and large, they've all dematerialized in favor of this. >> Yeah, and it's hard for them to really invest at scale. Let me give you an example. So, your biggest tier one operator, without naming anybody, okay, how many developers do they have that can build and maintain an OS image, or can keep track of container technology, or build monitoring at scale? In our company, we have literally thousands of developers doing it already for the cloud and all we're doing for the operator segment is customizing it and focusing it at the carrier grade aspects of it. But so, I don't have half a dozen exterior experts. I literally have a building of developers who can do that and I'm being literal, here. So it's a scale thing. Once you have a product that you can give to multiple people, everybody benefits. >> Dave: Yeah, and the carriers are largely, they're equipment engineers in a large setting. >> Oh, they have a tough job. I always have total respect what they do. >> Oh totally, and a lot of the work happens, you know, kind of underground and here they are. >> They are network operators. >> They don't touch. >> It's their business. >> Right, absolutely, and they're good at it. They're really good at it. That's right. You know, you think about it, we love to, you know, poke fun at the big carriers, but think about what happened during the pandemic. When they had us shift everything to remote work, >> Dennis: Yes. >> Landline traffic went through the roof. You didn't even notice. >> Yep. That's very true. >> I mean, that's the example. >> That's very true. >> However, in the future where there's innovation and it's going to be driven by developers, right, that's where the open ecosystem comes in. >> Yousef: Indeed. >> And that's the hard transition for a lot of these folks because the developers are going to win that with new workloads, new applications that we can't even think of. >> Dennis: Right. And a lot of it is because if you look at it, there's the fundamental back strategy hat back on, fundamental dynamics of the industry, forced investment, flat revenues. >> Dave: Yeah. Right. >> Very true. >> Right? Every few years, a new G comes out. "Man, I got to retool this massive thing and where I can't do towers, I'm dropping fiber or vice a versa." And meanwhile, most diversification efforts into media have failed. They've had to unwind them and resell them. There's a lot of debt in the industry. >> Yousef: Yeah. >> Dennis: And so, they're looking for that next big, adjacent revenue stream and increasingly deciding, "If I don't modernize my network, I can't get it." >> Can't do it. >> Right, and again, what I heard from some of the carriers in the keynote was, "We're going to charge for API access 'cause we have data in the network." Okay, but I feel like there's a lot more innovation beyond that that's going to come from the disruptors. >> Dennis: Oh yeah. >> Yousef: Yes. >> You know, that's going to blow that away, right? And then that may not be the right model. We'll see, you know? I mean, what would Microsoft do? They would say, "Here, here's a platform. Go develop." >> No, I'll tell you. We are actually working with CAMARA and GSMA on the whole API layer. We actually announced a service as well as (indistinct). >> Dave: Yeah, yeah, right. >> And the key there, frankly, in my opinion, are not the disruptors as in operators. It's the ISV community. You want to get developers that can write to a global set of APIs, not per Telco APIs, such that they can do the innovation. I mean, this is what we've seen in other industries, >> Absolutely. >> That I critically can think of. >> This is the way they get a slice of that pie, right? The recent history of this industry is one where 4G LTE begot the smartphone and app store era, a bevy of consumer services, and almost every single profit stream went somewhere other than the operator, right? >> Yousef: Someone else. So they're looking at this saying, "Okay, 5G is the enterprise G and there's going to be a bevy of applications that are business service related, based on 5G capability and I can't let the OTT, over the top, thing happen again." >> Right. >> They'll say that. "We cannot let this happen." >> "We can't let this happen again." >> Okay, but how do they, >> Yeah, how do they make that not happen? >> Not let it happen again? >> Eight APIs, Dave. The answer is eight APIs. No, I mean, it's this approach. They need to make it easy to work with people like Yousef and more importantly, the developer community that people like Yousef and his company have found a way to harness. And by the way, they need to be part of that developer community themselves. >> And they're not, today. They're not speaking that developer language. >> Right. >> It's hard. You know, hey. >> Dennis: Hey, what's the fastest way to sell an enterprise, a business service? Resell Azure, Teams, something, right? But that's a resale. >> Yeah, that's a resale thing. >> See, >> That's not their service. >> They also need to free their resources from all the plumbing they do and leave it to us. We are plumbers, okay? >> Dennis: We are proud plumbers. >> We are proud plumbers. I'm a plumber. I keep telling people this thing. We had the same discussion with banks and enterprises 10 years ago, by the way. Don't do the plumbing. Go add value on the top. Retool your workforce to do applications and work with ISVs to the verticals, as opposed to either reselling, which many do, or do the plumbing. You'd be surprised. Traditionally, many operators do around, "I want to plumb this thing to get this small interrupt per second." Like, who cares? >> Well, 'cause they made money on connectivity. >> Yes. >> And we've seen this before. >> And in a world without telephone poles and your cables- >> Hey, if what you have is a hammer, everything's a nail, right? And we sell connectivity services and that's what we know how to do, and that both build and sell. And if that's no longer driving a revenue stream sufficient to cover this forced investment march, not to mention Huawei rip and government initiatives to pull infrastructure out and accelerate investment, they got to find new ways. >> I mean, the regulations have been tough, right? They don't go forward and ask for permission. They really can't, right? They have to be much more careful. >> Dennis: It is tough. >> So, we don't mean to sound like it's easy for these guys. >> Dennis: No, it's not. >> But it does require a new mindset, new skillsets, and I think some of 'em are going to figure it out and then pff, the wave, and you guys are going to be riding that wave. >> We're going to try. >> Definitely. Definitely. >> As a veteran of working with both Dell and Microsoft, specifically Azure on things, I am struck by how you're very well positioned in this with Microsoft in particular. Because of Azure's history, coming out of the on-premises world that Microsoft knows so well, there's a natural affinity to the hybrid nature of Telecom. We talk about edge, we talk about hybrid, this is it, absolutely the center of it. So it seems like a- >> Yousef: Indeed. Actually, if you look at the history of Azure, from day one, and I was there from day one, we always spoke of the hybrid model. >> Yeah. >> The third point, we came from the on-premises world. >> David: Right. >> And don't get me wrong, I want people to use the public cloud, but I also know due to physics, regulation, geopolitical boundaries, there's something called on-prem, something called an edge here. I want to add something else. Remember our deal on how we are partner-centric? We're applying the same playbook, here. So, you know, for every dollar we make, so many of it's been done by the ecosystem. Same applies here. So we have announced partnerships with Ericson, Nokia, (indistinct), all the names, and of course with Dell and many others. The ecosystem has to come together and customers must retain their optionality to drum up whatever they are on. So it's the same playbook, with this. >> And enterprise technology companies are, actually, really good at, you know, decoding the customer, figuring out specific requirements, making some mistakes the first time through and then eventually getting it right. And as these trends unfold, you know, you're in a good position, I think, as are others and it's an exciting time for enterprise tech in this industry, you know? >> It really is. >> Indeed. >> Dave: Guys, thanks so much for coming on. >> Thank you. >> Dave: It's great to see you. Have a great rest of the show. >> Thank you. >> Thanks, Dave. Thank you, Dave. >> All right, keep it right there. John Furrier is live in our studio. He's breaking down all the news. Go to siliconangle.com to go to theCUBE.net. Dave Vellante, David Nicholson and Lisa Martin, we'll be right back from the theater in Barcelona, MWC 23 right after this short break. (relaxing music)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. of the Telecom systems They're maybe not part of the show, Lots of stuff happened in the Telecom, It's called the Azure Operator Nexus. Dave: The engineers you for our marketing team. from the far-edge to the disaggregation of the network What's the vibe, and certainly the So a lot of the traditional about the cloud and edge. to include the network as one, And so the question Oh, did you? cross the chasm, if you will. and I ought to be able to create scale So what would you do? So what would you do? of 5G is it's the first cloud from the two networks. but hybrid as in, you know. and you got to get on the table, It's national, secure in terms of the quality of Dennis: They're questioning the timing, is going to be open over time. to open systems once again. (Dave laughing) You don't have to start with the ORAN familiar of how high the bar is. So the cloudification, if you will, and it's key for the operator but the actual components, Of, compared to DIY, As in the early days of public cloud, dematerialized in favor of this. and focusing it at the Dave: Yeah, and the I always have total respect what they do. the work happens, you know, poke fun at the big carriers, but think You didn't even notice. and it's going to be driven And that's the hard fundamental dynamics of the industry, There's a lot of debt in the industry. and increasingly deciding, in the keynote was, to blow that away, right? on the whole API layer. And the key there, and I can't let the OTT, over "We cannot let this happen." And by the way, And they're not, today. You know, hey. to sell an enterprise, a business service? from all the plumbing they We had the same discussion Well, 'cause they made they got to find new ways. I mean, the regulations So, we don't mean to sound and you guys are going Definitely. coming out of the on-premises of the hybrid model. from the on-premises world. So it's the same playbook, with this. the first time through Dave: Guys, thanks Have a great rest of the show. Thank you, Dave. from the theater in
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Yousef Khalidi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Yousef | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jose Maria Alvarez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AT&T | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
36 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
36 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GSMA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Ericson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
theCUBE.net | OTHER | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Eight APIs | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Huawei | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CAMARA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Satya | PERSON | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
MWC 23 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
third point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2021
>>Okay, welcome back to the cubes coverage of Del tech world. I'm john for your host of the cube we're here for virtual coverage were not yet face to face as we start to come out of covert, we're still doing the remote but we got the cube virtual. We're here with Dennis Hoffman, senior Vice President, General Manager for the telecom Systems business group within Dell Technologies dead. It's great to see you. Thanks for coming in CUba alumni. Thanks for coming on. >>My pleasure, john great to see you and look forward to the days when we can stop doing this virtually. >>Well, you guys have been certainly pumping out a lot of content and right now telco cloud telco disruption is big. We heard Michael Dell last event and even when we were in person in real life, we he was really laying down the five G leadership now with hybrid cloud, um, standardized, pretty much I mean, consensus is no, no debate really. It's hybrid multi cloud on the horizon. That's still just a subsystem of basically distributed computing A. K. A hybrid cloud makes the edge a huge part of the story this year. And the innovations all around telecom, Edge in five G have been around and they're changing really fast. What's how are these Edge in five G technologies impacting the market today? >>Yeah, it's uh is fascinating times, I'll tell you they are providing really the ultimate carrots, you know, the catalyst for um innovation in the market and really driving the world's network operators To uh want to take advantage of all the opportunity that the edge presents and that 5G enables. And it's, you know, at the end of the day, it's really forcing folks to think hard about if they have the right network architectures to enable that to capture that opportunity to have the right kind of capabilities. And so we're seeing an awful lot of interest in network desegregation, network modernization, various forms of adopting the technology is you and I are familiar with from years of what's going on in data center evolution are really starting to hit the telco network now at a really, really interesting time >>while we're on the landscape. Do you want to get your opinion on something? I've been hearing a lot, certainly in interviewing other folks here at Dell tech world and in the industry about how the edge and the data compute equation and the connectivity has changed how they're going to lay out essentially their factory, their plants, their operations and certainly covid pushing everyone at home has changed the game on how data is being computed on and how apps are being built. This is a huge five G opportunity certainly when you start to get into the business impact, autonomous vehicles, I've been doing stories about autonomous boats and everything we could have an autonomous cube soon. So, you know, everything is autonomous which drives to this whole edge piece, What's your take on that? >>Yeah, you know, it's, it's funny for years we've been talking about on prem and off prem, like there's two problems there turns out there's a third Prem, right? There is the other premises and that is not the private data center and not the public cloud. And when you stop and think about it, it it makes sense because at the end of the day, wherever we can get data, we can create digital advantage and it's always been cheaper and more effective and faster to move compute to data than to move data to compute. So technology is like 5G are beginning to make it possible to run very interesting applications in very different places and capture what is predicted to be some 3/4 of the data created over the next decade is going to get created somewhere other than a private data center or a public cloud. And that's the edge, you know, in telcos, look at that third premises as their opportunity to get another bite of the apple on services. Four G was kind of a story of the over the top. Players really took the profit pool and made a lot of money from the over to the netflix is to the itunes and so on and so forth. But when you come back to Five G and think of it kind of as the Enterprise G, it's a chance now for the world's network operators to really get a chunk of that profit pool that comes from the emergence of this third premises called the edge >>Enterprise G. I love that, I'm gonna steal that from you. It's a great, great uh >>somebody else >>uh Yeah, the new trend, but it's a business, it's a business opportunity again, totally cool. And consumers to um okay, so you got your out on the road a lot. I know that we've talked in the past on the cube. There's a lot of discussions in the industry, as well as customers that you're having. What are you hearing? What are the some of the pain points are, see Covid has unveiled unveiled new use cases, people had had adapted to it. There's adaptations that are out there that are new and then things that might not happen again. What are you hearing from customers? >>Yeah, I would say in summary, we're hearing a mix of optimism and uncertainty, optimism around all the stuff we just talked about and that you mentioned, you know, it's it's a blank from anywhere. World right work from anywhere, learn from anywhere. Medicine from anywhere. And you know, if the pandemic has taught us anything, it's about the absolute necessity of communications technology to the world we live in today. The uncertainty comes from this question of, okay, so I know that there's this big opportunity and I know that I need to modernize my network architecture and kind of change the way I operate to capture it all. But the architecture is I run on today, make that really hard. And the architecture is that that the modern data center is built on, We know they work. But how do I get them in a way that allows me to build a resilient, high performance agile communications network. Um, you know, today we uh we face a world in which we see, we have a world in which solutions are delivered very fairly monolithically in the network uh for network operators but going forward, the power to potentially decompose all of that is wonderful provided it can be recomposed in a way they can consume. And I think that's where the uncertainty lies. There's a lot of testing and trialing of pieces of applications of underlying hardware, infrastructure, servers, accelerators, um certainly different types of virtualization and container ization technologies. But in the end these networks need to run it many many many nines um and they need to be extremely robust and pulling together a lot of different components from the open ecosystem is a daunting challenge for most of the network operators. >>You know, I hear you saying about the opportunity recognition and the re factoring how we called re composing this opportunity here and again. I like this enterprise G angle because what it means is that it's not the consumer the only it's it's everything. It's a complete consumer ization of I. T. So it's a whole another edge landscape. Prem third, the third premise is the edge. All good. I've always so set on the cube and certainly Dave and I have David and I have riffed on this is that you know, everything is now cloud operations and the data center is a big edge and then you've got other pieces that are just edges. A distributed system kind of sounds like a computer in the cloud. So this is kind of operating model. So I have to ask the question which is in telco, if it's gonna be distributed like that and it's going to be operated at scale, how is Dell responding to capture the mind share and customers using Dell in this new telco disruption? Because it's kind of you got to keep the lights on and you gotta also get them in a position to take advantage of the new opportunity. How are you responding? >>Yeah, Well, we're trying to we're literally trying to fill that gap, you know, the talking to the world's uh modern or say the world's telecom network operations leaders. We've uh we've had a lot of conversations with folks about what they need to do and what's holding them back from really in many ways taking advantage of the digital transformation that that's kind of rippling through the economy. And as they kind of laid that out to us, we decided that it was an enormous opportunity for Dell that this this uh you know, this new network will be fundamentally built on computer technology uh and it will be open industry standard computer technology. And on top of that we will use virtualization. And if this begins to sound like the way data centers are being built, because that's exactly what's happening. But more than that, I think there's a need for an at scale substantial provider that the world's biggest carriers can bet on and feel they can trust as a strategic partner to not only pull the ecosystem together, validated, certified, curated a little bit uh, and deliver it as an outcome, but then stand behind it running and importantly, do all of that in a way that doesn't constrain the continuous innovation. That's really the hallmark of some of these modern architecture. So for us, we see, you know, an opportunity that is literally perfectly built for a company like dealt and that's why we decided to invest in it. That's why you hear Michael talking about it a lot. Uh it's um, you know, it's it's really super well aligned with our strategy, we think it's actually key to winning the edge. Uh and and it's also really well aligned with our purpose, you know what this company exists to accelerate human progress through technology. And this little slice of it is all about accelerating communications and the transformation of modern networks to do exactly that right, To help close the digital divide, to bring fair and equitable medicine and learning to all, um and to allow us all to work from wherever we're working. So it's uh it's something that we're excited about on multiple levels and we think the company is really built for the distributed computing environment that a modern telco network represents. >>Yeah, what's interesting is that the value that you guys can enable at the edge, his real impact, It's not just data center and compute and have applications. Remember the old days I got my crm in my E. R. P and I got my apps on my systems and it's all good now. Business is completely software enables, it's the entire business and the business is software naval, which means that you have to have that edge. So I totally love of the positioning and strategy. I have to ask you if you don't mind, where is the residents with customers when you look at the telco enablement there that you're enabling them to do what's resonating the most, what's jumping out from the telescopes in terms of what Dell's doing for them And the customers, you mentioned tele medicine, which by the way, is an amazing impact to the world. Just one example. But where's the residence? >>Yeah. You know, first we we are what we are. Right. So it's, I think with a lot of conversations, it begins with, um, the telecommunications network needs server technology, but it needs very specific kinds of server technology built in very specific ways. Um, the, you know, the needs of compute at the base of a cell tower on a hill in Montana in the middle of winter are different than we've been building for data centers for years. So I think the first thing that resonates it, I need it, I need a very specific kind of open compute, uh, infrastructure hardware foundation that is industry standard. And, and we turn to somebody like Delta do do exactly that. But what we've learned is there's so much more than that because really we need to begin to deliver outcomes on top of that foundation. Uh, First outcome, we need to deliver his modern operations and maintenance of a distributed network. Zero touch provisioning, zero touch upgrading. How can we impact the total cost of maintenance and ownership in a meaningful way, um, for a network that is in fact constructed out of a fabric of server. On top of that there's the actual network core network services, Edge, the radio access network. And how do we successively open up each section of the network, driving computing storage all the way to the edge? Because for many organizations in the world, many enterprises, their edge will actually be on the telco premises. Right. The telco edge will be their edge. Some of the bigger companies certainly can build their own. But as you get in the world of medium and small business, the person they buy their circuits from and their communications from. If they have the ability to deliver them private slices of networks and virtual compute and storage, that's going to be how they get after it. So you know for us that next piece that resonates is the ability to pull together solutions like we've been doing for years with the ex rail hyper converged the stuff we did with the C. E. Back in the day and then last >>I'm just saying that you know you're bringing up things that kind of sound. It's super complex physical plant and equipment. You're talking about real hard and purpose built devices in the past very operational technology oriented stuff and then that has to have I. T. Agility right? And then have scalability behind it and complete you know integration this is not obvious and easy. It's hard. >>Yeah. No I mean software doesn't run on software right? Software runs on hardware and so as much as a lot of the power and the interest comes from what the application can do underlying it all is a capability to distribute, compute and storage to where the application or the software wants to run or runs best. That's what's really cool about five G is its ability to do the stuff you mentioned earlier on, you know, the, the G Wiz stuff, drones and autonomous and a AR and VR and all the things that ultra reliable, low latency communication would make possible on a grand scale that really bring the machines into the picture, not just humans on the edge. It's the stuff, right? That that's on the edge and we've been talking about it for a long time, but none of it's gonna matter if we don't put this infrastructure foundation in place. Then we got to lay an open marketplace of containerized network functions. Virtualized network functions on top of that all to enable our network operators to deliver interesting services to end users. It's >>super exciting. I got to say that it's a super exciting because you know, it's coming it's like the energies there, it's like the, you know, the storm's coming of disruption in the innovation because you think about what containers and cloud native kubernetes the cloud native technologies can do for legacy because its shelf life and more headroom, right? So you can you can win these telcos can actually not only pivot but line extension into new capabilities. So they tend to be very strong technically is an operator, operator networks, the hard tech stuff, physical stuff and software but not known for it. I mean but now there's a huge opportunity that's gonna come around the corner. I'm bullish on Iot and edge where you have the O. T. And I. T. Coming together. It's really compelling And it's going to be radically different I think in the next 5 to 10 years what's your take on that in terms of outlook? >>Couldn't agree more. Yeah I mean it's you know it's for those of us are in the industry always the knowledge of what's coming or the belief in what's coming. The hype precedes the actual development. But you know just as I don't know 15 20 years ago the idea that you can completely disrupt the taxi industry with an app and a four G smartphone service was in nobody's mind except maybe a couple of people. You >>know it >>makes you wonder what is the what is the uber equivalent of a business service that will be fundamentally enabled by the architecture we just described that we're not thinking about right now and that's why every time we move from a centralized computing model to a decentralized computing models that decentralized computing models dramatically larger than a centralized, >>way >>bigger than mainframe. Edge, way bigger than client server, which is already way bigger than cloud, Public. Cloud. And so I think it's, you know, there's a, there's a lot of promise, a lot of excitement. Still a long way to go though. A lot of the stuff we're talking about still is not actually rolled out into the network. Um and that's kind of the opportunity for somebody like them. >>Yeah. And decentralized and open winds. It's funny you mentioned high, we were talking David was just talking with Michael Dell and Pat Gelsinger in 2013. We're talking hybrid cloud, that's 78 years ago. Okay, so good stuff. Let's get into the news real quick. Um Deltek World, you've got some news coming. Uh Let's dig into it. Please share some of the outlook of the news. You're gonna be you're you're announcing here? >>Yeah, thanks. Sure, john, I mean, we're gonna be announcing two things relative to the telecom portfolio. Uh and they're both reference architectures with VM ware. One is the second edition of the telco cloud platform for five G. Um, so that's a Delvian where reference architecture, that is exactly what we just talked about. It's this open software defined on industry standard hardware platform, um for running 5G applications. And then the other one is the first version of the telco cloud platform for the radio access network, TCP ran as we would call it. Um and as we start to push this technology from the core out towards the edge of the telecom network. So to really interesting developments in in deep partnership with VM ware and stuff, we've been working on for a while stuff, we are in fact working on with customers and delivering today and we'll be making formal announcements about those at the D T W show. >>Awesome. Dennis, thanks for coming on the Cuban, sharing the update and thanks for the industry insight. Uh, I love the telco shift that's going on. It's an extension of existing, I think cloud native saves the day here with telco and allows the completely different landscape to evolve. So you guys were on top of it. Thanks for sharing S VP and general manager, the telecom systems business with Dell Dennis. Hoffman. Thanks for coming on. >>Thanks john Okay >>cube coverage here. Del Tech world. I'm john for a year. Thanks for watching. Yeah.
SUMMARY :
It's great to see you. of the story this year. the ultimate carrots, you know, the catalyst for um innovation compute equation and the connectivity has changed how they're going to lay out essentially made a lot of money from the over to the netflix is to the itunes and so on and so forth. It's a great, great uh There's a lot of discussions in the industry, as well as customers that you're having. optimism around all the stuff we just talked about and that you mentioned, you know, it's it's a on the cube and certainly Dave and I have David and I have riffed on this is that you know, everything is now cloud So for us, we see, you know, an opportunity that is literally perfectly it's the entire business and the business is software naval, which means that you have to have that edge. of the network, driving computing storage all the way to the edge? And then have scalability behind it and complete you much as a lot of the power and the interest comes from what the application can do I got to say that it's a super exciting because you know, it's coming it's like the energies there, the idea that you can completely disrupt the taxi industry with an app and a four G smartphone service was A lot of the stuff we're talking about still is not actually rolled out into the network. of the news. One is the the telecom systems business with Dell Dennis. Thanks for watching.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Montana | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Delta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
john | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two problems | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first version | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
itunes | TITLE | 0.98+ |
uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
second edition | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
each section | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
78 years ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
15 20 years ago | DATE | 0.92+ |
Zero touch | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.92+ |
Delvian | OTHER | 0.91+ |
third premises | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
third premise | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Del | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
D T W | EVENT | 0.89+ |
next decade | DATE | 0.87+ |
Dennis. Hoffman | PERSON | 0.86+ |
Enterprise G. | TITLE | 0.83+ |
G Wiz | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.83+ |
zero touch | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Five G | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Iot | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
5 | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
3/4 of | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
Enterprise G | TITLE | 0.73+ |
First outcome | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
Four G | TITLE | 0.73+ |
telco edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
Dell Technologies World | ORGANIZATION | 0.69+ |
CUba | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
nk cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
Cuban | LOCATION | 0.6+ |
Deltek World | ORGANIZATION | 0.58+ |
G | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
Covid | PERSON | 0.5+ |
Prem | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.48+ |
telco | TITLE | 0.46+ |
Edge | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.44+ |
five | TITLE | 0.4+ |
Dennis Hoffman, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2020
>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of Dell Technologies World Digital Experience, brought to you by Dell Technologies. >> Hello everyone and welcome back to theCUBE's continuing coverage of Dell Tech World 2020. This is Dave Volante and with me is Dennis Hoffman. He's a senior vice president and general manager for telecom systems business at Dell Technologies. Good to see you Dennis. Welcome. >> Thanks Dave. Great to be here. >> So let's talk a little bit about corporate strategy, which is your wheelhouse. I'm curious, has the pandemic at all altered your thinking on Dell strategy? >> Interestingly enough it hasn't. I suppose it would be standard for me to say that, but if anything, it's just given us both a sense of the challenge of what we had to do as a company to keep doing business. But also it's been really illuminating because it's given us a glimpse of the future. And fortunately, I think we've been pretty well prepared for what's happening. >> Well, I think in a way there's a bias inside of Dell because you guys were probably more work from home than the average company and you, in a way, might've been more prepared for this and maybe your thinking was already headed in that direction. What do you think about that? >> No, I think it's a reasonable thesis. The company is very much a work-from-home oriented or mobile in terms of where we work, an overall, I guess, hypothesis that work's something you do, it's not a place. But we also had a portfolio that benefited from the pandemic and an overarching strategy that was really to help our customers transform digitally. And if anything, the pandemic's accelerated all of that. So again, not without its challenges. And I certainly feel for the folks who get an awful lot of their energy from working with people every day because that's what's missing for an awful lot of folks who are doing an awful lot of what you and I are doing here. But otherwise I think we were biased toward it and it worked out pretty well so far. >> Okay. So it hasn't changed your strategy, but I would imagine some of your assumptions have changed. I mean, obviously more people are going to be working from home now, probably at least double. If it was 15 to 20% pre-COVID, it's going to be, let's call it 30, 35, maybe even 40% post-COVID. Maybe it's going to take a while, six, nine months to get there. But I would imagine some of your assumptions have changed. Is that a fair statement? >> Yeah, I think ours and the industries at large. Most companies' business continuity plans really centered around natural disasters. In most of those plans, 30% of the population working remotely was the high watermark. Right now, we're seeing whole industries redoing their business continuity plans, factoring in 60, 70% bogeys for how many people or what percentage of their population would work from home. As we surveyed our employees, 90% of people said we be either some form of hybrid work experience or completely remote. So, again, if we're for a bit of a leading edge on this, we're probably going to be tilted even more toward it, but there's been a big change in assumption about what remote work looks like and what you've got to do to make it productive. >> So we're a decade and a half into the cloud or at least the modern cloud era. What's your take on where the industry is today and how it affects your business and your cloud strategy broadly? >> Yeah, it's a fascinating. We're in the midst of an ever accelerating set of cycles or pendulum swings from centralized computing to decentralized computing back to centralized. We went from the mainframe era to the client server era and then even quicker to the cloud era. And now we're seeing the emergence of the edge. The one thing that's constant through all of this is workloads are like water. They seek their ground. Workloads have characteristics. They need performance, economics, security, data gravity. And so we've been firm believers through this whole time that a certain amount of workload's going to end up in a very centralized model. Some is going to end up very decentralized and our job is just to enable our customers to put the workloads where they need to run best. So as you point out, we're quite a ways into the cloud era now. It looks like the edge era is emerging. I like to think of it as really three legs of a stool. You've got work can run in a private data center, it can run in a public data center or it can run everywhere else. And increasingly, everywhere else is being called the Edge, all of it by the way, in a cloud operating model. So big distinction between cloud, the model and cloud, the place. And so in many ways, we talked specifically to certain vertical markets, the cloud era is already beginning to give way to the beginning of the Edge era. >> Well, and at the same time too, you're seeing the hyperscalers recognizing the need for whatever it is, for economics, for legal reasons, for preference or latency moving on-prem. >> Right. >> And so I was having an interesting discussion with the CIO the other day and I asked them, "Well, what what do you look at as cloud? "Cloud is everywhere. "I got my cloud on-prem. "I got my multiple clouds, which is clear. "Everybody's going multicloud." And then he happened to have 17,000 stores that he was looking after. He goes, that's Edge to me. That's all part of my cloud. And now of course, part of your role is telco. So let's talk about that space. You've got the over-the-top providers. They're sucking off the infrastructure that have been built out by the telcos. Cost per bid is coming down. Data uses is exploding. And the telco industry really has to transform its infrastructure. They're not agile enough and they can't wait to get to this new era of 5G. So I'm interested in your thoughts on that, how you see Dell helping. >> Well, as I'll tell you, you characterize it right on. I've in the last several months, spend a lot of time with telecom executives all over the world because of how easy it is to do this sort of thing. And they need to transform. The digital transformation sweeping the rest of the world has caught up with telecom and for a whole bunch of reasons. And some of those you pointed out, right, agility, cost, economics. They're in a funny place. Never has the demand for communication services been greater. And yet never have their financial positions been more challenged. Because they're stuck between an old, fairly proprietary, closed architecture and a handful of vendors and on the other hand, embracing this cloud computing data era where there's thousands of vendors. And they somehow all need to be cobbled together into an open software-defined system that runs on industry standard hardware. And yet most telecoms aren't prepared to do that integration themselves. So for us, we see immense opportunity. It's literally as if a massive 100 billion dollar plus addressable market has effectively decided they need to start buying the kinds of things we've been making for years. And moreover, they are by definition, fundamentally a distributed model. The big difference, I think, between Dell Technologies and a hyperscaler is we as a company we're built in and for a distributed computing world. We deal with very mundane topics like how do you get a person onsite within an hour? And how many spares depots do you have? And all of those sorts of things. Whereas hyperscalers were built for the exact opposite. A world in which they said, "Hey, give me your data, "give me your workloads. "I'll think hard about it. "And I'll give you a very flexible economic model." The Edge puts all of that up in the air and telcos's the leading part of this Edge, right? They're the ones that own a great deal of the Edge. And as you pointed out, 5G is really the thing that's got everybody excited. >> Well, you bring up a good point about the hyperscalers. I mean, their challenge now is they go on-premise. Okay. How do you service and support those customers at scale 'cause everything they do is at scale, it's all highly automated. So that's interesting. At the same time, I wonder you're a strategy guy. You look at what Amazon retail does. They're putting up warehouses everywhere. They're putting points of presence. I wonder if there are analogs to the technology business. It's probably more complicated, right, 'cause you're not servicing, you're just delivering. >> But I think you're right on. There's analogs. Look, we all are what we are as vendors. We all have our business models. Ours is to sell equipment and software and services to somebody. Amazon, since its founding, has really been about how do I insert myself in a transaction and ease that transaction and take a slice? Google's been about democratizing and monetizing the world's data. So Amazon needs access to transactions. Google needs access to the world's data, all the hyperscalers want into telco because they want onto the Edge. The same point you made about on-premises, right, like Outpost or Azure Stack. It's fundamentally admission by a hyperscaler that, "Yeah, I guess all workload doesn't belong "in the public cloud. "It's not all going to end up here." And I think they've got the same challenge when it comes to the Edge. And so people are trying to build their way out 'cause they need connectivity to the Edge. For us, we know that telecoms have to become multi clouds. You've referenced earlier the over-the-top profit problem. Well, they lost the profits from the consumer. B2C, they built the networks, they ran the networks and everybody else took the profit. So now here comes 5G with the promise of business services, real B2B revenue opportunities for telecom. And once again, they're faced with a choice. Either they become the cloud operator and allow the hyperscalers in as part of their multi-cloud or they give up the cloud to the hyperscalers and there go the over-the-top profits again. So it really, I found, a fascinating set of dynamics and an industry that can really use the help of somebody like Dell Technologies. >> Well, that's interesting 'cause as is many markets, consumer leads and then B2B markets open up. Well, how do you think this plays out? I mean, the telcos have very specialized hardware. They got this hardened and fossilized infrastructure. So where do you guys fit in that transformation and how do you see it evolving? >> Well, it's already started in a way, it's from the inside out. So telecommunications companies, as I look at them, as we look at them, they're almost like three companies in one. They have conventional IT organizations that in many ways look no different than a bank. They have their businesses, of course, the network where they spend the vast majority of their money, but it's not homogenous. There's a network core, there's a network Edge and then there's an access network. And then most of them, of course, sell services, business services. So they have lines of business. So we look at them as an IT organization, through the CIO, as a massive network operator through the CTO and then as a business partner, some of whom are even in our channel program and their cloud, their cloud services partners. And that's all through their line of business. So they're starting to open up from the inside out. Data center's going through transformation. It's begun in the network core. Now, the Edge is the next thing. And the RAN, in case of mobile operator, the radio access network, will ultimately come. And so you're right. There's a fossilized infrastructure in some places, but we've already seen the core start to desegregate and it will now ripple all the way out to their Edge and I think frankly through it and right onto the enterprise premise with private mobility. >> And so do you see them taking that infrastructure model all the way out to the Edge and trying to replicate essentially their what would've been monopolies for years or do you see them... It sounds like it's going to be a mix. Some of them are actually maybe going to lean on the hyperscalers and try to become more over-the-top content providers. >> Well, I think two challenges in business right? I guess they say there's three great motivators in business in life, make money, save money, stay out of jail, like revenue, cost and risk. They got a cost problem. They've got to get off the monolithic closed infrastructure architectures. They've got a revenue problem that a lot of the additional revenues and services went to somebody else, the OTT, the over-the-top folks. And so I think you will absolutely see a mix, but nobody can afford. No telecom communications company can afford to simply hand their network over. Unless they've reconciled, I'm just going to be a dumb pipe again, right? And none of them want that. >> Right. = But I think in many ways, they're waiting for somebody to walk in and say, "But here's the answer." And I can tell you that at Dell Technologies, and by that, I mean both within Dell and certainly within VMware, we're very strong proponents of the notion of an open software-defined network architecture built on industry standard hardware. And we're pretty well positioned, I think, to provide it or certainly that's the hope and the thesis behind our business. >> Yeah. So that then allows them to compete much more effectively, to provide, like you say, new B2B services, but it really is their infrastructure has been the big blocker up until recently. And you're right. I mean, network function virtualization has started to see through. We've seen some of the benefits of that and then now they've got to take it to the next level, your point about the Edge. >> Well in the 5G standard or 5G, the next cellular technology generation is actually defined by the three GPP standards. Release 15 was the first one that came out and it specified both standalone 5G networks where you can get all of these benefits and non-standalone where you basically have to mix 5G into the core, rely on the 4G Edge. And that's the only thing that's been deployed so far. So as in many things, the hype leads the reality by a little bit. So we've been talking 5G for a while, but the release 16 that would get you some of the really hyped up features of 5G just released this year. So it's coming and there's a lot of talk about it right now. There's a race to have the largest 5G network in America and the largest 5G network in the UK and so on and so forth. But this isn't really the true power of 5G. That window is still open and it's coming. >> You do a lot of strategy work. You obviously see the opportunity Edge, the term is just enormous. So you got to be wetting your chops at that. At the same time, the requirements are totally different. So I'm curious as to how you, as a strategy expert, dovetail into the architectural decisions that have to be made and the connective tissue between strategy and architecture and actually the whole go-to market, that whole value chain that you think about, how are you thinking about that in the world of Edge? >> Well there's, at the end of the day, two strategy decisions you got to make, where do I play and if I decide to play there, how do I win? So where do you play on the Edge is a very interesting question. Anytime there's a new computing paradigm shift, you go from something that's been pretty stable and frankly pretty horizontal and it becomes pretty verticalized. So the Edge is thousands of things right now. And it's many highly verticalized use cases, manufacturing, mining, retail, even something as simple as campus wifi replacement. So you've got to pick your spot. And for a company of our size, that really comes down to thinking about which of these Edge use cases are going to pop first, which one's going to teach you the most, which one's going to have the right level of scale. And this is where telco and Edge intersect because it turns out one big and easily reachable use case for Edge is to partner strongly with the telecommunications industry where something like 30 companies in the world make up 80% of the capital spending. I mean, you don't have to run a Superbowl ad. You can get all of your customers in a bus, right. So that's why I think there's really this somewhat silent, somewhat subtle and somewhat not so subtle competition for the architecture of the telecom industry as it refreshes, both because of 5G as an inflection point, but also just because of the stuff we talked about earlier, the economics, the need to modernize and embrace open-software defined industry standard architecture. >> And do have visibility at this point as to how portable the race to the telcos identify that sort of new standards? Do you have a sense as to how portable that would be to some of these other use cases or is it really like the software industry of when that started to grow, it was just so fragmented. Now, granted it's consolidated now, but do you have visibility on that yet? >> A little, but I mean the basic building blocks are quite portable. There's radio technology, 5G radio technology and there's a distinction between what might be required say to replace wifi at the Dell Round Rock Campus versus what AT&T needs for Manhattan, right? >> Yeah. >> But basically there's radio technology, which is increasingly becoming software running on industry standard hardware. And then the same sort of virtualization layer that is helpful in basically pulling all of this together, plays there as does the underlying hardware where Edge servers can be built for telco spec and easily modified to be an Edge enterprise use case. That's the base. On top of that however, is often a vertical solution. Like in retail's very timely, temperature sensing and mask detection and distance determination, right? So somebody's going to want to take that capability. And that's not something you're going to bounce off of some public cloud. You're going to want to actually understand in real time, as people walk in and out of the place, are they being compliant with whatever policies I have? So on top of some of this compute and virtualization and to some extent sometimes storage on the Edge, what else goes on that? Is it a video surveillance solution? Is it an automated mining RFID solution? And so we've got a little bit of insight and we know which verticals appear to be largest right now and which ones are going to pop first. And that's where a lot of people are putting their attention. >> Well, it's going to be interesting 'cause it sounds like there's a real long tale there. And you mentioned industry standard hardware and software, but maybe a new industry standard emerges for some of those use cases that you just mentioned where you need very low latency. Maybe that's where ARM gets in and maybe get some massive volume because while it's a long tail, it's also huge. >> It is. I mean, some people are estimating the Edge economy to be four times the internet economy because we get stuff that's going to be written that we don't even... It's no different than we went from... At one point, the only software in the world was mainframe software. And then some knucklehead wrote client server software and it was considered a niche. Fast forward 15 years later, mainframe is a subsegment of the computer industry and it's all client server software. And then we go cloud native. And at first it's a couple of cloud native apps and pretty soon it's a bunch. And this thing just goes back and forth. The difference is or I think the interesting thing is the cycle times are really compressing. I don't know if you've read Tom Friedman's latest book, "Thank You For Being Late", but it's all about how do we thrive as humans in the age of accelerations? Because the theory is we're not getting enough time to catch our breath now between pendulum swings. It's interesting. Same thing happened in cellular technology. I didn't know until I started doing this job, but 1G was real for about... It was the dominant form of networking for 17 years for mobile networking. Then 2G was for around 11. 3G was seven-ish. 4G looks like it's going to be six. So technology just keeps quickening. And it makes the amount of time we get to be horizontal and catch our breath as the industry is stable, there's always an inflection of some sort going on in our industry. And so change is absolutely the new normal. >> Yeah. And some of these things are really hard to predict. I mean, remember TCP/IP used to be this old, reliable protocol that runs the world. >> Exactly right. >> I want to ask you about... Last question is as a service initiative of Project Apex or Apex it's called. And that's obviously not just some kind of gimmick. I mean, that affects the strategy of the entire organization, the way in which customers want to consume the product or platform strategies now. How does that as a service pricing model affect the business that we've been talking about for the last 10 or 15 minutes? >> Well, the good news for us, those of us at the company working on Edge and telecom and all of that sort of stuff is we're actually building the business under the Apex philosophy, right? So our design center out of the gate is as a service. Michael made the observation a long time ago within our leadership team that, back to my comment, that workloads are like water. They seek their ground. There's a difference between where a workload belongs and the interest in a particular operating model or excuse me, a particular consumption model. And get they've been combined for a long time, right? The only way to get the, as a service consumption model, was through public cloud infrastructure. But it turns out that the right place for workload may well be on-premises not in a private data center or it may well be on the Edge not in a public cloud, but people still want to take advantage of the consumption model, right? The economics are the economics. And so for me, doing the telecom stuff, it's, as a service, the heart of the design center from a consumption model right out of the gate, which is frankly easier than trying to retrofit everything else. >> Right. >> But nonetheless, for us as a company, it's just an opportunity to give our customers the choice that they want in terms of not only what they acquire, but how they acquire it. >> Well Dennis, I always love talking to you. You're such a clear thinker and you've obviously gone deep into some of these topics. And good luck in the role in the telco world. It's obviously a huge opportunity. Everybody's really excited about it. And thank you for coming on theCUBE. >> All right. Thank you, Dave. It's been a pleasure. Nice chatting with you. >> Alright. And thank you for watching, everybody. This is theCUBE's coverage of Dell Tech World 2020, the virtual cube. Keep it right there. We'll be right back right after this short break. (relaxed music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Dell Technologies. Good to see you Dennis. I'm curious, has the pandemic glimpse of the future. than the average company And I certainly feel for the folks are going to be working from home now, 30% of the population working remotely a half into the cloud and cloud, the place. Well, and at the same time too, And the telco industry and on the other hand, At the same time, I wonder and allow the hyperscalers in I mean, the telcos have and right onto the enterprise all the way out to the Edge that a lot of the additional the hope and the thesis We've seen some of the benefits of that And that's the only thing and actually the whole go-to market, the economics, the need to modernize or is it really like the software industry the basic building blocks and easily modified to be Well, it's going to be interesting And it makes the amount of protocol that runs the world. I mean, that affects the strategy And so for me, doing the telecom stuff, the choice that they want in terms of And good luck in the Nice chatting with you. the virtual cube.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Volante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
AT&T | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tom Friedman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thank You For Being Late | TITLE | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
17 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two challenges | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Manhattan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
17,000 stores | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three great motivators | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Apex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
15 years later | DATE | 0.98+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
100 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Superbowl | EVENT | 0.96+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
thousands of vendors | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Outpost | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
three legs | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
a decade and a half | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
ARM | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Dell Tech World 2020 | EVENT | 0.93+ |
two strategy | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.92+ |
35 | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
today | DATE | 0.9+ |
Release 15 | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
an hour | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
around 11. 3G | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
60, 70% | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
nine months | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
90% of people | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.8+ |
last | DATE | 0.8+ |
Dell Round Rock Campus | LOCATION | 0.77+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
ish | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
Dennis Hoffman V1
>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of Dell Technologies World Digital Experience, brought to you by Dell Technologies. >> Hello everyone and welcome back to theCUBE's continuing coverage of Dell Tech World 2020. This is Dave Volante and with me is Dennis Hoffman. He's a senior vice president and general manager for telecom systems business at Dell Technologies. Good to see you Dennis. Welcome. >> Thanks Dave. Great to be here. >> So let's talk a little bit about corporate strategy, which is your wheelhouse. I'm curious, has the pandemic at all altered your thinking on Dell strategy? >> Interestingly enough it hasn't. I suppose it would be standard for me to say that, but if anything, it's just given us both a sense of the challenge of what we had to do as a company to keep doing business. But also it's been really illuminating because it's given us a glimpse of the future. And fortunately, I think we've been pretty well prepared for what's happening. >> Well, I think in a way there's a bias inside of Dell because you guys were probably more work from home than the average company and you, in a way, might've been more prepared for this and maybe your thinking was already headed in that direction. What do you think about that? >> No, I think it's a reasonable thesis. The company is very much a work-from-home oriented or mobile in terms of where we work, an overall, I guess, hypothesis that work's something you do, it's not a place. But we also had a portfolio that benefited from the pandemic and an overarching strategy that was really to help our customers transform digitally. And if anything, the pandemic's accelerated all of that. So again, not without its challenges. And I certainly feel for the folks who get an awful lot of their energy from working with people every day because that's what's missing for an awful lot of folks who are doing an awful lot of what you and I are doing here. But otherwise I think we were biased toward it and it worked out pretty well so far. >> Okay. So it hasn't changed your strategy, but I would imagine some of your assumptions have changed. I mean, obviously more people are going to be working from home now, probably at least double. If it was 15 to 20% pre-COVID, it's going to be, let's call it 30, 35, maybe even 40% post-COVID. Maybe it's going to take a while, six, nine months to get there. But I would imagine some of your assumptions have changed. Is that a fair statement? >> Yeah, I think ours and the industries at large. Most companies' business continuity plans really centered around natural disasters. In most of those plans, 30% of the population working remotely was the high watermark. Right now, we're seeing whole industries redoing their business continuity plans, factoring in 60, 70% bogeys for how many people or what percentage of their population would work from home. As we surveyed our employees, 90% of people said we be either some form of hybrid work experience or completely remote. So, again, if we're for a bit of a leading edge on this, we're probably going to be tilted even more toward it, but there's been a big change in assumption about what remote work looks like and what you've got to do to make it productive. >> So we're a decade and a half into the cloud or at least the modern cloud era. What's your take on where the industry is today and how it affects your business and your cloud strategy broadly? >> Yeah, it's a fascinating. We're in the midst of an ever accelerating set of cycles or pendulum swings from centralized computing to decentralized computing back to centralized. We went from the mainframe era to the client server era and then even quicker to the cloud era. And now we're seeing the emergence of the edge. The one thing that's constant through all of this is workloads are like water. They seek their ground. Workloads have characteristics. They need performance, economics, security, data gravity. And so we've been firm believers through this whole time that a certain amount of workload's going to end up in a very centralized model. Some is going to end up very decentralized and our job is just to enable our customers to put the workloads where they need to run best. So as you point out, we're quite a ways into the cloud era now. It looks like the edge era is emerging. I like to think of it as really three legs of a stool. You've got work can run in a private data center, it can run in a public data center or it can run everywhere else. And increasingly, everywhere else is being called the Edge, all of it by the way, in a cloud operating model. So big distinction between cloud, the model and cloud, the place. And so in many ways, we talked specifically to certain vertical markets, the cloud era is already beginning to give way to the beginning of the Edge era. >> Well, and at the same time too, you're seeing the hyperscalers recognizing the need for whatever it is, for economics, for legal reasons, for preference or latency moving on-prem. >> Right. >> And so I was having an interesting discussion with the CIO the other day and I asked them, "Well, what what do you look at as cloud? "Cloud is everywhere. "I got my cloud on-prem. "I got my multiple clouds, which is clear. "Everybody's going multicloud." And then he happened to have 17,000 stores that he was looking after. He goes, that's Edge to me. That's all part of my cloud. And now of course, part of your role is telco. So let's talk about that space. You've got the over-the-top providers. They're sucking off the infrastructure that have been built out by the telcos. Cost per bid is coming down. Data uses is exploding. And the telco industry really has to transform its infrastructure. They're not agile enough and they can't wait to get to this new era of 5G. So I'm interested in your thoughts on that, how you see Dell helping. >> Well, as I'll tell you, you characterize it right on. I've in the last several months, spend a lot of time with telecom executives all over the world because of how easy it is to do this sort of thing. And they need to transform. The digital transformation sweeping the rest of the world has caught up with telecom and for a whole bunch of reasons. And some of those you pointed out, right, agility, cost, economics. They're in a funny place. Never has the demand for communication services been greater. And yet never have their financial positions been more challenged. Because they're stuck between an old, fairly proprietary, closed architecture and a handful of vendors and on the other hand, embracing this cloud computing data era where there's thousands of vendors. And they somehow all need to be cobbled together into an open software-defined system that runs on industry standard hardware. And yet most telecoms aren't prepared to do that integration themselves. So for us, we see immense opportunity. It's literally as if a massive 100 billion dollar plus addressable market has effectively decided they need to start buying the kinds of things we've been making for years. And moreover, they are by definition, fundamentally a distributed model. The big difference, I think, between Dell Technologies and a hyperscaler is we as a company we're built in and for a distributed computing world. We deal with very mundane topics like how do you get a person onsite within an hour? And how many spares depots do you have? And all of those sorts of things. Whereas hyperscalers were built for the exact opposite. A world in which they said, "Hey, give me your data, "give me your workloads. "I'll think hard about it. "And I'll give you a very flexible economic model." The Edge puts all of that up in the air and telcos's the leading part of this Edge, right? They're the ones that own a great deal of the Edge. And as you pointed out, 5G is really the thing that's got everybody excited. >> Well, you bring up a good point about the hyperscalers. I mean, their challenge now is they go on-premise. Okay. How do you service and support those customers at scale 'cause everything they do is at scale, it's all highly automated. So that's interesting. At the same time, I wonder you're a strategy guy. You look at what Amazon retail does. They're putting up warehouses everywhere. They're putting points of presence. I wonder if there are analogs to the technology business. It's probably more complicated, right, 'cause you're not servicing, you're just delivering. >> But I think you're right on. There's analogs. Look, we all are what we are as vendors. We all have our business models. Ours is to sell equipment and software and services to somebody. Amazon, since its founding, has really been about how do I insert myself in a transaction and ease that transaction and take a slice? Google's been about democratizing and monetizing the world's data. So Amazon needs access to transactions. Google needs access to the world's data, all the hyperscalers want into telco because they want onto the Edge. The same point you made about on-premises, right, like Outpost or Azure Stack. It's fundamentally admission by a hyperscaler that, "Yeah, I guess all workload doesn't belong "in the public cloud. "It's not all going to end up here." And I think they've got the same challenge when it comes to the Edge. And so people are trying to build their way out 'cause they need connectivity to the Edge. For us, we know that telecoms have to become multi clouds. You've referenced earlier the over-the-top profit problem. Well, they lost the profits from the consumer. B2C, they built the networks, they ran the networks and everybody else took the profit. So now here comes 5G with the promise of business services, real B2B revenue opportunities for telecom. And once again, they're faced with a choice. Either they become the cloud operator and allow the hyperscalers in as part of their multi-cloud or they give up the cloud to the hyperscalers and there go the over-the-top profits again. So it really, I found, a fascinating set of dynamics and an industry that can really use the help of somebody like Dell Technologies. >> Well, that's interesting 'cause as is many markets, consumer leads and then B2B markets open up. Well, how do you think this plays out? I mean, the telcos have very specialized hardware. They got this hardened and fossilized infrastructure. So where do you guys fit in that transformation and how do you see it evolving? >> Well, it's already started in a way, it's from the inside out. So telecommunications companies, as I look at them, as we look at them, they're almost like three companies in one. They have conventional IT organizations that in many ways look no different than a bank. They have their businesses, of course, the network where they spend the vast majority of their money, but it's not homogenous. There's a network core, there's a network Edge and then there's an access network. And then most of them, of course, sell services, business services. So they have lines of business. So we look at them as an IT organization, through the CIO, as a massive network operator through the CTO and then as a business partner, some of whom are even in our channel program and their cloud, their cloud services partners. And that's all through their line of business. So they're starting to open up from the inside out. Data center's going through transformation. It's begun in the network core. Now, the Edge is the next thing. And the RAN, in case of mobile operator, the radio access network, will ultimately come. And so you're right. There's a fossilized infrastructure in some places, but we've already seen the core start to desegregate and it will now ripple all the way out to their Edge and I think frankly through it and right onto the enterprise premise with private mobility. >> And so do you see them taking that infrastructure model all the way out to the Edge and trying to replicate essentially their what would've been monopolies for years or do you see them... It sounds like it's going to be a mix. Some of them are actually maybe going to lean on the hyperscalers and try to become more over-the-top content providers. >> Well, I think two challenges in business right? I guess they say there's three great motivators in business in life, make money, save money, stay out of jail, like revenue, cost and risk. They got a cost problem. They've got to get off the monolithic closed infrastructure architectures. They've got a revenue problem that a lot of the additional revenues and services went to somebody else, the OTT, the over-the-top folks. And so I think you will absolutely see a mix, but nobody can afford. No telecom communications company can afford to simply hand their network over. Unless they've reconciled, I'm just going to be a dumb pipe again, right? And none of them want that. >> Right. = But I think in many ways, they're waiting for somebody to walk in and say, "But here's the answer." And I can tell you that at Dell Technologies, and by that, I mean both within Dell and certainly within VMware, we're very strong proponents of the notion of an open software-defined network architecture built on industry standard hardware. And we're pretty well positioned, I think, to provide it or certainly that's the hope and the thesis behind our business. >> Yeah. So that then allows them to compete much more effectively, to provide, like you say, new B2B services, but it really is their infrastructure has been the big blocker up until recently. And you're right. I mean, network function virtualization has started to see through. We've seen some of the benefits of that and then now they've got to take it to the next level, your point about the Edge. >> Well in the 5G standard or 5G, the next cellular technology generation is actually defined by the three GPP standards. Release 15 was the first one that came out and it specified both standalone 5G networks where you can get all of these benefits and non-standalone where you basically have to mix 5G into the core, rely on the 4G Edge. And that's the only thing that's been deployed so far. So as in many things, the hype leads the reality by a little bit. So we've been talking 5G for a while, but the release 16 that would get you some of the really hyped up features of 5G just released this year. So it's coming and there's a lot of talk about it right now. There's a race to have the largest 5G network in America and the largest 5G network in the UK and so on and so forth. But this isn't really the true power of 5G. That window is still open and it's coming. >> You do a lot of strategy work. You obviously see the opportunity Edge, the term is just enormous. So you got to be wetting your chops at that. At the same time, the requirements are totally different. So I'm curious as to how you, as a strategy expert, dovetail into the architectural decisions that have to be made and the connective tissue between strategy and architecture and actually the whole go-to market, that whole value chain that you think about, how are you thinking about that in the world of Edge? >> Well there's, at the end of the day, two strategy decisions you got to make, where do I play and if I decide to play there, how do I win? So where do you play on the Edge is a very interesting question. Anytime there's a new computing paradigm shift, you go from something that's been pretty stable and frankly pretty horizontal and it becomes pretty verticalized. So the Edge is thousands of things right now. And it's many highly verticalized use cases, manufacturing, mining, retail, even something as simple as campus wifi replacement. So you've got to pick your spot. And for a company of our size, that really comes down to thinking about which of these Edge use cases are going to pop first, which one's going to teach you the most, which one's going to have the right level of scale. And this is where telco and Edge intersect because it turns out one big and easily reachable use case for Edge is to partner strongly with the telecommunications industry where something like 30 companies in the world make up 80% of the capital spending. I mean, you don't have to run a Superbowl ad. You can get all of your customers in a bus, right. So that's why I think there's really this somewhat silent, somewhat subtle and somewhat not so subtle competition for the architecture of the telecom industry as it refreshes, both because of 5G as an inflection point, but also just because of the stuff we talked about earlier, the economics, the need to modernize and embrace open-software defined industry standard architecture. >> And do have visibility at this point as to how portable the race to the telcos identify that sort of new standards? Do you have a sense as to how portable that would be to some of these other use cases or is it really like the software industry of when that started to grow, it was just so fragmented. Now, granted it's consolidated now, but do you have visibility on that yet? >> A little, but I mean the basic building blocks are quite portable. There's radio technology, 5G radio technology and there's a distinction between what might be required say to replace wifi at the Dell Round Rock Campus versus what AT&T needs for Manhattan, right? >> Yeah. >> But basically there's radio technology, which is increasingly becoming software running on industry standard hardware. And then the same sort of virtualization layer that is helpful in basically pulling all of this together, plays there as does the underlying hardware where Edge servers can be built for telco spec and easily modified to be an Edge enterprise use case. That's the base. On top of that however, is often a vertical solution. Like in retail's very timely, temperature sensing and mask detection and distance determination, right? So somebody's going to want to take that capability. And that's not something you're going to bounce off of some public cloud. You're going to want to actually understand in real time, as people walk in and out of the place, are they being compliant with whatever policies I have? So on top of some of this compute and virtualization and to some extent sometimes storage on the Edge, what else goes on that? Is it a video surveillance solution? Is it an automated mining RFID solution? And so we've got a little bit of insight and we know which verticals appear to be largest right now and which ones are going to pop first. And that's where a lot of people are putting their attention. >> Well, it's going to be interesting 'cause it sounds like there's a real long tale there. And you mentioned industry standard hardware and software, but maybe a new industry standard emerges for some of those use cases that you just mentioned where you need very low latency. Maybe that's where ARM gets in and maybe get some massive volume because while it's a long tail, it's also huge. >> It is. I mean, some people are estimating the Edge economy to be four times the internet economy because we get stuff that's going to be written that we don't even... It's no different than we went from... At one point, the only software in the world was mainframe software. And then some knucklehead wrote client server software and it was considered a niche. Fast forward 15 years later, mainframe is a subsegment of the computer industry and it's all client server software. And then we go cloud native. And at first it's a couple of cloud native apps and pretty soon it's a bunch. And this thing just goes back and forth. The difference is or I think the interesting thing is the cycle times are really compressing. I don't know if you've read Tom Friedman's latest book, "Thank You For Being Late", but it's all about how do we thrive as humans in the age of accelerations? Because the theory is we're not getting enough time to catch our breath now between pendulum swings. It's interesting. Same thing happened in cellular technology. I didn't know until I started doing this job, but 1G was real for about... It was the dominant form of networking for 17 years for mobile networking. Then 2G was for around 11. 3G was seven-ish. 4G looks like it's going to be six. So technology just keeps quickening. And it makes the amount of time we get to be horizontal and catch our breath as the industry is stable, there's always an inflection of some sort going on in our industry. And so change is absolutely the new normal. >> Yeah. And some of these things are really hard to predict. I mean, remember TCP/IP used to be this old, reliable protocol that runs the world. >> Exactly right. >> I want to ask you about... Last question is as a service initiative of Project Apex or Apex it's called. And that's obviously not just some kind of gimmick. I mean, that affects the strategy of the entire organization, the way in which customers want to consume the product or platform strategies now. How does that as a service pricing model affect the business that we've been talking about for the last 10 or 15 minutes? >> Well, the good news for us, those of us at the company working on Edge and telecom and all of that sort of stuff is we're actually building the business under the Apex philosophy, right? So our design center out of the gate is as a service. Michael made the observation a long time ago within our leadership team that, back to my comment, that workloads are like water. They seek their ground. There's a difference between where a workload belongs and the interest in a particular operating model or excuse me, a particular consumption model. And get they've been combined for a long time, right? The only way to get the, as a service consumption model, was through public cloud infrastructure. But it turns out that the right place for workload may well be on-premises not in a private data center or it may well be on the Edge not in a public cloud, but people still want to take advantage of the consumption model, right? The economics are the economics. And so for me, doing the telecom stuff, it's, as a service, the heart of the design center from a consumption model right out of the gate, which is frankly easier than trying to retrofit everything else. >> Right. >> But nonetheless, for us as a company, it's just an opportunity to give our customers the choice that they want in terms of not only what they acquire, but how they acquire it. >> Well Dennis, I always love talking to you. You're such a clear thinker and you've obviously gone deep into some of these topics. And good luck in the role in the telco world. It's obviously a huge opportunity. Everybody's really excited about it. And thank you for coming on theCUBE. >> All right. Thank you, Dave. It's been a pleasure. Nice chatting with you. >> Alright. And thank you for watching, everybody. This is theCUBE's coverage of Dell Tech World 2020, the virtual cube. Keep it right there. We'll be right back right after this short break. (relaxed music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Dell Technologies. Good to see you Dennis. I'm curious, has the pandemic glimpse of the future. than the average company And I certainly feel for the folks are going to be working from home now, 30% of the population working remotely a half into the cloud and cloud, the place. Well, and at the same time too, And the telco industry and on the other hand, At the same time, I wonder and allow the hyperscalers in I mean, the telcos have and right onto the enterprise all the way out to the Edge that a lot of the additional the hope and the thesis We've seen some of the benefits of that And that's the only thing and actually the whole go-to market, the economics, the need to modernize or is it really like the software industry the basic building blocks and easily modified to be Well, it's going to be interesting And it makes the amount of protocol that runs the world. I mean, that affects the strategy And so for me, doing the telecom stuff, the choice that they want in terms of And good luck in the Nice chatting with you. the virtual cube.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Volante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
AT&T | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tom Friedman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thank You For Being Late | TITLE | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
17 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two challenges | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Manhattan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
17,000 stores | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three great motivators | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Apex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
15 years later | DATE | 0.98+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
100 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Superbowl | EVENT | 0.96+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
thousands of vendors | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Outpost | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
three legs | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
a decade and a half | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
ARM | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Dell Tech World 2020 | EVENT | 0.93+ |
two strategy | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.92+ |
35 | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
today | DATE | 0.9+ |
Release 15 | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
an hour | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
around 11. 3G | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
60, 70% | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
nine months | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
90% of people | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.8+ |
last | DATE | 0.8+ |
Dell Round Rock Campus | LOCATION | 0.77+ |
Tech World 2020 | EVENT | 0.77+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
ish | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
Dale Hoffman, IBM | VeeamON 2019
>> Live from Miami Beach, Florida, it's the CUBE, covering VeeamON2019. Brought to you by Veeam. >> Welcome back to Miami everybody. This is Dave Vellate with Peter Burris here. Day One of VeeamOn2019, at the Fontainebleau Hotel in Miami. Rat Pack used to hang out here Which is kind of the big theme of the reception last night. Dale Hoffman is here. He's the Director of Offering Management for VMWare Solutions at IBM. Dale, thanks for coming to the group. >> Thanks, David. It's a pleasure to be here and Peter, nice to meet you. >> Okay, yeah, pleasure to meet you as well. So lets unpack the sort of notion of Offering Management that sort of people generally refer to as Product Management. IBM calls it Offering Management. So you are focused on the public cloud, but specific to the VMWare swimlane. Is that right? >> Yeah, that is correct. So, if you think about it I own the VMWare Offering Solutions on our cloud. So, that is everything associated with the whole VMWare software defined data center stack, but also a lot of our partner solutions. Many solutions in the security space. Many solutions in the business resiliency space. And that's kind of where Veeam had came in on that aspect. >> So the first public cloud deal that VMWare did, correct me if I'm wrong, was with IBM, was it not? >> Yeah, so if you just go back a little bit in time, IBM itself is probably the largest, if not the largest, provider of VMWare workloads. And mainly that's due to a lot of our GTS services business. But back in 2016, this looked like a great opportunity to actually go on the public cloud and actually stand up a software defined data center stack from VMWare. So, we started on that in that partnership with VMware and started to just basically grow that business. That business has been growing at about a 75% CAGR, and then that was kind of like step one, get the stack, and then step two was how do you get those security services in, and some of those business resiliency services in. And that's where we started to go in and do a real deep partnership with Veeam and happy to say that we started that in 2017 and we have about 12,000 plus VMs, both bare metal and also on virtualized VMWare on our cloud. Its been about 170% year to year growth rate. So Veeam's killing it on our cloud. They really are. >> And your scope is anything in the IBM cloud that's VMWare related so it could be >> That is correct. >> Data base services, it could be >> Absolutely. >> Object stores, obviously data protection with Veeam. What do you think is driving the Veeam-IBM momentum? >> Well, I think what's driving it is if you think about a lot of these, you know, critical customers, first thing they're going to want to do is take advantage of a lot of things that you get with the cloud. Whether its moving from a capex to an opex model with being able to get that capacity expansion. And there's a whole bunch of different use cases that you've got, but one of the key things to them is this whole business continuity. The ability to make sure that I can back it up, I can recover as quickly as I possibly can, and maybe more importantly, we have about 60 data centers worldwide. And being able to, essentially, have that geographic span is a huge advantage. And also the, fact that, just take backup as a simple example. When I back up I may be moving data back and forth in a particular region. I'm looking for some latency. And not to be able to be charged for that is a powerful value proposition for the customer. So, we don't charge for any type of data movement inside our cloud. And also, when you go outside, maybe for high availability, outside into the geographic reach, the same thing happens. So I think those are some very key things. That it's the security, the very fast backup and recovery, and knowing that you're not getting charged for that private secure network. It brings a real good value proposition to our customers that are leveraging Veeam and other services. >> So we think that we're now entering into a third era of cloud where the first one was basically makers, companies that created SAS companies, gaming companies, and then people moved analytics into there for a variety of reasons. Now the enterprise seems to be getting in it in a big way. Certainly at the large size. But that's starting to move down into the mid-range as well. Your advantage, IBM's advantage, has always been your ability to engage and bind with your customer base. How are you, how is IBM helping to move these customers forward, and what is the backup restore conversation in that process? Is it an afterthought? Is it something that's becoming more central to their thinking? How is it working? >> Yeah, so that's a great question, Peter. So, the way I think we in IBM cloud have thought about this is we've kind of divided the journey to cloud into two pieces. The 20% that are there, they weren't the real I'll call them business critical type of workloads that are going on, but that next 80% that's where we really see a huge advantage to us. Its out enterprise relationships. Its what we do from a security aspect on the cloud, and how easily we could help them, what we call lift and shift and migrate things over. And then once you're there, how can I help give you that assurance that we're going to give you the best backup, the best recovery in the event of a disaster, something that can, if you do see a failure, being able to have a very fast recovery point, you know, objective, and get you knowing that everything is secure and backed up and has this wide geographic spread. And even think about in the areas of compliance these days. GDPR. I mean, you have to have these data centers worldwide and sometimes they have to be you know, fixed. So, we provide that whole value proposition, I think, to those clients, in that essence. And I think the business critical, and, eventually, what we call mission critical workloads that will eventually move over, its probably the best choice to be able to have that trusted place to put workloads. >> So, the other, related to that, is you've got customers who are now moving and we're going to see them moving at varieties of speeds, but increasingly, the enterprises are going to move faster to do this than they've done in almost anything previously. And you've got Veeam, a very hard charging vendor, that has a reputation for great quality stuff, but a lot of innovation, moving very quickly. How is, how are you ensuring that there's no impedance mismatch between you, IBM, IBM customers, and Veeam and the technology vectors that it's on. >> Yeah, well first of all, its a very, very deep partnership. I mean very, very6 close relationship with them. This is not a vendor supplier relationship. This is a very, very deep partnership. And the other thing is, from a technology standpoint, one of our big differentiators on the cloud is, we actually provide that access all the way down to the hypervisor level. So, you have full freedom of action to do whatever you want to be able to do. So, from a Veeam standpoint, since its really based on a hypervisor type of technology, that gives us a real big advantage, because let's say, David, you're using Veeam on-prem. I give it the exact same look and feel as if you're off-prem, and I essentially make that data center look like an extension, like it was just in the next building and such. >> It's just another group, it's just another pool of VMs. >> Absolutely. And that whole, control and management of that gives you extreme flexibility that you really can't get in any other type of cloud. I like to say that You can come in and custom build your infrastructure, your VMWare software defined data center stack, your services such as Veeam. You custom build it any way that you want. It's like leasing a car. After you custom built that car, we hand you the keys. It's client managed. You go out and do whatever you want with that. And if you don't like it you can turn those keys back in, because we just do things not on a long term commitment, but on monthly commitments and such. >> And I want to, I want to maybe drill down on that a little bit, Dale. >> Sure. >> And try to better understand some of the flexibility that I'm inferring from your statement. So, you're a mainframer. You remember the days of SMS, and one of the things about it was that I could set policy for data protection, for backup, based upon the workload. I could say back this up once a week or back this up every day or back this up every hour or what is was. I had a granular level of capability. It was mainframe so it was, you know, big stuff. A lot of the challenges within, certainly the mid-size and smaller businesses, it's like one size fits all. This has been a, you know, a problem for everybody for years. Danny Allen, this morning, in the analyst and media session was talking about... >> This is the products guy here at VM. >> Yeah, yeah, yeah. Talking about the ability to sort of set granular levels, the pressures of RPO and RTO. And I want to sort of test how challenging it is to do that by workload or by application, and how IBM and Veeam are supporting that. How complicated is it? Are your clients doing it or is it still kind of a one size fits all world. >> I wouldn't say its one size fits all, but what I would say is by giving the clients full control and having the freedom and flexibility to do things that they want, the tight integration of this Veeam technology into the V-Center console and such, it gives them the ability, I like to say, do it at your own pace. Do it when you want to. Even something as simple as, lets say, managing VMWare and patching it, instead of having somebody else do it for you at their pace, we essentially allow you to do it at your pace when you want to. And its the same thing with the backup. You do it when you want to, at your frequency, what regions you want to go, or your whole geographic spread. And we try to provide the maximum flexibility and control to our mutual clients to enable that. >> And on the automation scale, or you know, the 9-inning game of automation, where are we? How, how automated can I make that, but more importantly, how fast are customers adopting that sort of automation scenario. >> Yeah, so you're experience when you come into our, our cloud, and essentially you click on "I want to go to the cloud," you click on the VMWare offering, its a very simple menu. You pick your infrastructure, compu... network storage. I'll keep it simple for now. You pick your software defined data center stack and we even enable a BYOL. A lot of people have their own Vsphere licenses. We enable them to go in and insert their key which is a cost advantage to them. Then you pick your partner services and such. So you pick your Veeam, and then you go in there and say "Well, where do I want to put it? Do I want to put it into Vsan? Do I want to put it into a file based storage?" And I think what we're really excited about is, we just recently announced being able to put this into IBM's cloud object storage. And that's huge, because, if you think about it, we all live in this area of regulatory and compliance and you can't throw anything away and the data is just exploding all over the place. So, having that ability to put it into a lower cost storage and all automated and essentially Veeam can essentially point to any of those multiple storage tiers. It gives our customers a big advantage so that they could essentially, I'll call it right-tune what they want to do and where they want to do their backups. So, they want something there quick or they say "Nah, you know, that could be a cold vault. I can keep that out there for a while and when I need it I'll go back and get it." So a lot of flexibility on storage options, a lot of flexibility on the pricing. But Veeam essentially is that powerhouse behind it that's actually interfacing that VMWare world as well as on the bare metal side over to those various levels of storage. >> So David, to answer your question, where are we in that 9 innings. I would have said bottom of the 1st, 1 out, 2 men on, 1 of them is Manny Ramirez. [Laughter] Because you just don't know what's going to happen next, and that's what I want to bring up. Veeam talked about... >> Is he a Boston fan? >> No, I'm not. [Laughter] I'm not. But Veeam talked about the "with Veeam" and I'm wondering how IBM sees it bringing its, this massive innovation, you still are one of the leading generators of patents in certainly the tech industry, but globally. How do you see IBM bringing IBM intellectual property, IBM invention, to this "with Veeam" platform to increase the degree to which it can serve a broader range of customers of different sizes, different geographies, and different workload forms. How do you see IBM participating in that process? >> Yeah, let me give you a couple examples. So, let me just take a non-Veeam example, just to talk about some IBM innovation. So, about a month ago we actually introduced something called hyperprotect cryptoservices. That's a big word there. Basically, it is, it's the same technology that we have in system Z, that's used by our large enterprise customers that gives you that, that FIPS 140-2, level 4. We are the only cloud in the world that has that technology that's on there. Basically, once you put your keys in there nobody's going to get to them at all. And it's an innovation of taking something that was done in a different division within IBM and now making that as an endpoint service within our cloud. Now, let me give you an example of doing a little bit of innovation even with Veeam. So, one of the things that we're trying to do is, you know, we started out hey, let's lay down the software data center stack, let's lay down partner services. Now, let's focus on what's that solution layer on top of it. How do we add more value into our clients? So, just take SAP, for example. We just recently announced both on a bare metal and also on our VMWare side, to be able to have a, we're the only cloud that has a certified SAP server in the cloud. And what we've just recently done is, we've integrated and put Veeam as that backup choice for that. So, now what that really enables everyone to do is leverage a lot of innovative work that Veeam was doing to make sure that you can back up SAP correctly. We married that with our infrastructure and our bare metal/VMWare stack with Veeam as that backup. And just a little bit of foreshadowing in the future, we're going to look at ways to further automate a lot of that SAP landscape so that our clients see, you know, a much better automated solution so that they essentially, using your baseball analogy, are going to see that full range of automation and say "Wow. I think we're at the end of the game here. This thing truly is automated, easy to consume, and I'll have the confidence of the security and the business resiliency knowing that it's got the trusted IBM name behind it. >> You know, give us the summary of 2019. Maybe some of the first half highlights and maybe show a little leg for the second half. >> Sure, sure. Why not? >> What can we expect leading up to IBM thing. >> So, I mentioned a few things about what we did in the security space already. So, we've enabled, besides our, what we've done with high trust, with data and key protection. We've also enabled IBM's key protect services. We brought the System Z hyperprotect services into the mix. We've enabled things like cavionics to bring the risk foresight. So, now, we can monitor a lot of compliance and keep things in compliance and monitor that for you. We brought some app modernization to essentially help people on their journey modernize their apps, leveraging both a tight integration of VMWare and what we call ICP-hosted or IBM Cloud Private hosted to get that tight integration and such. But moving forward I see a couple big things, and I'll try to maybe put them in the Veeam perspective and such. You heard me mention before about this 80% of that real key workload coming over to the cloud that, you know, business critical or mission critical. We announced last year something called mission critical VMWare, and basically what it is, it's two, two active, active type of sites with a witness site and you essentially are moving things back and forth so if you have a failure within a region you instantly can go in and switch over. And the idea is to give you the highest availability into the cloud. And Veeam is a very much integral part of that solution in the sense that it'll be our backup. And then since you said do a little bit of foreshadowing, say what's coming in the future. We have a very very strong single tenant VMWare offering on the cloud. Like I was saying, you know, it's client managed, the hypervisor access. You've got that extreme flexibility and control. But what we like to do is kind of look into a little bit more of that multi-tenant type of space. And we think it opens up a whole new market segment for us in that emerging market and commercial market space. Guess who's going to be our partner in that to make the backup happen? That's going to be Veeam. >> Cool. Dale Hoffman, thanks so much for coming to the CUBE and sharing. >> Oh, thank you for having me. >> Some of the ways in which IBM is differentiating, not doing infrastructure service and just racing to zero, but really trying to pick your spots and I really appreciate your insights and thanks again. >> Okay, thank you. >> Alright, keep it right there everybody. This is Dave Vellante with Peter Burris. Day one at VeeamON2019, and from Miami you're watching the CUBE. We'll be right back.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Veeam. Which is kind of the big theme of the reception last night. and Peter, nice to meet you. of Offering Management that sort of people generally So, if you think about it And mainly that's due to a lot of our What do you think is driving the And not to be able to be charged for that Now the enterprise seems to be getting in it its probably the best choice to be able to have So, the other, related to that, freedom of action to do whatever you It's just another group, it's just and management of that gives you drill down on that a little bit, Dale. A lot of the challenges within, certainly how challenging it is to do that by workload And its the same thing with And on the automation scale, or you know, a lot of flexibility on the pricing. bottom of the 1st, 1 out, 2 men on, 1 of them is But Veeam talked about the "with Veeam" and also on our VMWare side, to be able to have a, and maybe show a little leg for the second half. And the idea is to give you for coming to the CUBE and sharing. Some of the ways in which IBM This is Dave Vellante with Peter Burris.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Danny Allen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dale Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellate | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dale | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Veeam | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Manny Ramirez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two pieces | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Miami | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
second half | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1st | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
FIPS 140-2 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
2 men | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Miami Beach, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMWare | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMWare | TITLE | 0.99+ |
9-inning | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 60 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Veeam | PERSON | 0.98+ |
step two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first half | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
9 innings | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMWare Solutions | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
once a week | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 170% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
VeeamON2019 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
Day One | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Jason Hoffman, Ericsson - Red Hat Summit 2017
>> Announcer: Live, from Boston, Massachusetts. It's theCUBE! Covering Red Hat Summit 2017! Brought to you by Red Hat! (electronic music) >> Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of the Red Hat Summit, I'm Rebecca Knight, your host, I'm here with Stu Miniman, our guest today is Jason Hoffman. He is the vice president and global head of cloud infrastructure at Ericsson. Thanks so much for joining us here. >> Thanks so much for having me. >> Thank you. So, I want to start out by talking about the cloud market today, and where we are. We've heard here at the summit that the number one thing on customers' minds is cloud strategy. Is that, does that resonate with you? And what are you hearing from customers? >> Cloud's an interesting topic. Because it's both an infrastructure approach, sometimes people use it for a delivery model, sometimes people use it to describe a business model, sometimes people use it to describe a number of things. For me, for most companies, cloud's not strategic. Cloud's tactical. Cloud may be strategic to Amazon, cloud may be strategic to Microsoft, we've yet to see whether it's truly strategic for Google, and that, but for most people it's tactical. And I think it's a fine distinction to make, because tactical means there's stuff to do, and if you look at the thing to do, it's pretty clear that that approach to infrastructure is on highly accessible, industrialized infrastructure. And I anchor that in infrastructure because in the absence of that type of infrastructure then your delivery models and business models and stuff don't apply, basically. >> Jason, you bring up an interesting point, we heard in the first day keynote, they said, "One of the top priorities for end users is, "to build a cloud strategy." Because when I talk to most users, they've been very tactical, it's like, well, we moved our scene around, to SaaS. Everybody did. I'm starting to move certain business apps to SaaS. I've, everybody tried Dev, you know, on Amazon, and played with a number of other clouds, but you look at that, I had a guy who wrote for me, he was like, "We don't have hybrid cloud. "We have composite cloud." Because I've got all those things there, it's like, "How do I shop?" It's like, well, I stop at a convenience store where I need, I go to the store, and I get lots of stuff from Amazon. Sounds like how we do cloud! So where do you see, from the users that you talk to, I mean, you've been involved in this since the early days, so it feels like we talk a lot about cloud stuff, but it feels like we're getting a little bit more real, I'm heartened to see that users are starting to, you know, think about strategic, how they put things together, where do you see the customers you're talking to? >> Well, I mean, I think a lot of the customers are educated by the market. And the market tends to use a lot of these marketing terms, like composite, rather than getting down to what the actual sort of issues are. The issues, even if we go back to the highly accessible, industrialized type of infrastructure, I mean, the issue there is. Customers need to simplify things. They largely would like to do that through some type of, quote unquote, "automation". And they would like everything that they do under one governance model. Essentially, what you'd call life cycle management, or governance, or whatever. But these types of things that both the infrastructure, and the nature of the things that you do on it, are too complex. And they tend not to be, you know, once they're basically put in place, they tend not to be touched again. You know, so in fact, if you look at a good definition of like, legacy. Legacy, for me, is when the cost of keeping something as is, is basically cheaper than the replacement process. And actually if you look at that sort of cost curve, the day that something is best to leave as is, and it's very expensive to replace, is the day it goes live. >> So the legacy curve-- >> It's like driving a car off the lot. >> The legacy curve is actually a U-shaped curve. You know, in there. And in fact, the day something goes live, it's like a sieve and at some point, three, four, five years down the road, it's not legacy, and then about three, four, five years after that, it's legacy again. >> Reminds me of what Jeff Baso said, "There will never be a day two for us, "we are always going to stay day one, "focused on creating new stuff, "because otherwise once you go kind of steady state, "the decline is coming soon after." >> Yeah, and I think, I mean, if you look at now, myself having started I dunno, 20 plus years ago in scientific computing, and then, you know, meeting HPC and these types of efforts, and then showing up in sort of what one would call the quote unquote, "cloud world", the effort there has largely been the same, I mean, it's one of these ones where, infrastructure by its very nature is always risky to manage. You know, meaning things like, continuously deploying things into infrastructure, always runs the risk of making infrastructure inaccessible to people. You know, you don't instantly like, if a new operating system image comes out, you don't reboot 100, 000 servers. And then the applications that sit on top of it, and have historically inherited that risk from the infrastructure. And the effort has largely been separating those two. So that applications get freed of the risk from the underlying infrastructure, and then you can start applying a certain approach to the infrastructure, not really caring about what's on it. And cloud is pretty much this emergence of infrastructure, as its own practice. And it's going from traditional IT environments, where that sort of operational model, and that economic model, is not the center of anybody's product designs, to an operational and economic model that is at the center of everybody's sort of product designs. And the KPIs around what you're doing there, and whether you're successful, are relatively simple. And that is, you know, are you continuously improving, in terms of capacity, capabilities, and unit economics. You know, if you're not, if you don't have an exponentially decreasing unit economic curve, within, you know, a five year period of time, then you're probably not doing, you know, quote unquote, "cloud" right. >> Jason, we know with Ericsson's background, you've got strong positions in the telecom space, working a lot on the NFB solutions, expect that's a hot area of working with Red Hat, can you kind of sketch out for us, just where Ericsson sits in the marketplace today of where customers are coming to you, with kind of key partnerships? >> The element for us is that we're a 141 year old Swedish multinational. And we've been in the same business for 141 years. And that we provide the communication backbone for the world. And so, on one part of the business, is that if you see 2G, 3G, 4G, LTE, or stuff on the phone, or if you use a mobile phone in somewhere like North America, 100% of all that traffic goes over Ericsson applications. And so you know, we're a very dominant provider of that radio edge, if you will. The other thing we have, from an application portfolio perspective, is everything you need to be a telecom. So everything ranging from the network functions, through OSS environments, PSS environments, customer front ends. And the like. And the telecom space, has been undergoing some pretty dramatic changes, in some ways. Or not dramatic changes, depending on one sort of attitude over the last few years. The first one, is even though that far radio edge, if you will, has tens of millions of points of presence globally, that talk to billions of devices, that's a very algorithmically driven, event driven, very industrialized type of infrastructure. It's fair to say that if you look at the typical definition one would apply to hyperscale, it applies to the radio edge. It also applies to the sort of hyperscale cloud providers. In between those two things, is roughly about one to two trillion U.S. dollars of investments that sits in tens of thousands of facilities globally with pretty much the computer history museum of hardware and operating systems and everything else inside of it. It's effectively this whole middle mile infrastructure. For us, we sort of view the virtualization of everything that's in the telecom space, and uplifting it to a common infrastructure approach, is pretty critical to get a handle on that middle mile infrastructure. >> Jason, you know, when I think about the telecom space, we're talking about 5G now, these roll outs tend to take a while, we measure things in years, if not decades, before they roll out. Jim Whitehurst got on stage this morning, said, you know, "Planning is dead, "we don't do a 10 year big data plan, "we won't do a ten year AI plan." How does, you know, your set of the market live in this greater changing world, how do you look forward, can you predict like we did in the past? That's a, so I think yes and no. I mean, we, you're correct in that if you take a market like India, India's going to hit 200% 2G penetration in 2020. And so, we're talking about something that's going to happen 20 years after it started in other parts of the market. You have spots like Papua New Guinea, that are, have 2G networks throwing 200, 300% year over year. And so when you look at this globally, the roll out of these technologies are on, typically, a 30 year time schedule, overall. And they result in people owning assets that they have for at least 30 years. In many cases as well. So on one aspect, there is very long term planning that has to exist, and we have some customers we've had for a century. From that point of view, they have to know those types of plans. On the other end, is if you look at what we have to start doing from a technology standpoint, is enabling just a tremendous amount of flexibility, to be able to just get out of this legacy hamster wheel. This idea that the second you go and deploy something somewhere, you can't touch it again, and you can't continuously improve it again. You know, we're trying to sit down and say, "If we go out and do these types of deployments, "we need the ability "to actually continuously improve these." In fact, that's really what the industrialized word means for us. And so, for many of these things, you know, we've been taking certain approaches. I mean, interestingly enough, if you look at the actual mobile edge of things, the radio edge of things, that is one where there is one hardware platform, it comes in tens of form factors, we'll go and deploy out that infrastructure, and whether it's a 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, narrow band ILT infrastructure, it's purely unlocked in software. And so that is a good software to find, sort of infrastructure. And you do it that way because at the end of the day, somebody's got to go into a jungle and put a cell tower up, and you don't want to go out there again. And we want to take that same sort of thinking throughout the rest of the infrastructure. >> Jason, it always fascinates me, if you look at this space, I mean, I remember we interviewed you back at Joint, we were talking a lot of the show about containers, and there's things that we've tried in the past, and now it's coming at it again on edge computing, is something we're starting to talk about, it's a little bit difficult to predict how long some of that will take, and some of the cycles, but maybe to wrap us up, talk to us a little bit about this, you know, Ericsson's planning for the future, what are some of those big challenges that you see, that we as an industry need to tackle, and maybe some of the things that will earlier wins and stuff, that you know, might take a little bit longer. >> Yeah I mean, a little bit longer, and if I look out really, probably the next 15, 20 years, I mean the type of middle mile industrialization they're doing today is a prerequisite for all the IOTUs cases to show up on 5G. Because there's simply not enough middle mile capacity in the world, or capabilities there, to even have it go to an amazon type perspective. So even if that all ends up there, so, now it's going to be this very large effort of I think, bringing these two worlds together, and on the hyperscale cloud providers, you have a very industrialized approach in infrastructure, and it's very supply chain driven, and it's very sort of, easy to cookie cutter out. On the extreme end of the infrastructure, on the radio edge, it's the same what. And, but all the stuff in the middle's not. And if you look at the channelage from a cloud perspective, it's about taking those sort of learnings from the book ends of the infrastructure, bringing it to the middle, if you will. And starting to think about what, because edge computing's a great example, it's like, what does it mean when you start using that, from an end user perspective? You're not going to go to a pull down menu, and pick 12, 418 availability zones from a list of 120, 000 global availability zones. You're not going to automatically have issues around data sovereignty and everything else like that, just sort of be tackled. So I think in many ways, when we start looking at some core concepts that live in hundreds of facilities, and sort of large cloud providers, and some of these concepts where we manage to do things in tens of millions of base stations, talking to billions of devices, the reality for me is when you look at the redo, and now the more global use of that infrastructure that's in the middle, it's going to require developer accessibility, and a certain degree of programmability that doesn't actually exist yet. And you know, of course it's an open question of how much you do it. I mean, you know, you're going to have to scale topologically, rather than sort of scale in other ways. And a lot of that stuff's just not done yet. >> Jason, thank you so much for joining us, we really appreciate your time. >> Anytime. >> We'll be back with more of theCUBE's coverage of the Red Hat Summit, after this. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Red Hat! He is the vice president And what are you hearing from customers? and if you look at the thing to do, but you look at that, I had a guy who wrote for me, and the nature of the things that you do on it, And in fact, the day something goes live, "because otherwise once you go kind of steady state, And that is, you know, are you continuously improving, It's fair to say that if you look This idea that the second you go talk to us a little bit about this, you know, the reality for me is when you look at the redo, Jason, thank you so much for joining us, of the Red Hat Summit, after this.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jason Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jason | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Baso | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jim Whitehurst | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
ten year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Papua New Guinea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
141 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
30 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12, 418 availability zones | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
200% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
200, 300% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat Summit | EVENT | 0.99+ |
100, 000 servers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
billions of devices | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Red Hat Summit 2017 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
hundreds of facilities | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
20 plus years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one part | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one aspect | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
120, 000 global availability zones | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
day two | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
two worlds | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
tens of millions of base stations | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first day | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
tens of millions of points | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
NFB | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
one hardware platform | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
Swedish | OTHER | 0.9+ |
tens | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
141 year old | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
two trillion U.S. dollars | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Joint | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
tens of thousands of facilities | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
one sort | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.81+ |
least 30 years | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
about one | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
last few years | DATE | 0.72+ |
a century | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.67+ |
5G | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
next | DATE | 0.57+ |
Ericsson | EVENT | 0.57+ |
SaaS | TITLE | 0.55+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.46+ |
Mobile World Congress Preview 2023 | Mobile World Congress 2023
(electronic music) (graphics whooshing) (graphics tinkling) >> Telecommunications is well north of a trillion-dollar business globally, that provides critical services on which virtually everyone on the planet relies. Dramatic changes are occurring in the sector, and one of the most important dimensions of this change is the underlying infrastructure that powers global telecommunications networks. Telcos have been thawing out, if you will, they're frozen infrastructure, modernizing. They're opening up, they're disaggregating their infrastructure, separating, for example, the control plane from the data plane, and adopting open standards. Telco infrastructure is becoming software-defined. And leading telcos are adopting cloud native microservices to help make developers more productive, so they can respond more quickly to market changes. They're embracing technology consumption models, and selectively leveraging the cloud where it makes sense. And these changes are being driven by market forces, the root of which stem from customer demand. So from a customer's perspective, they want services, and they want them fast. Meaning, not only at high speeds, but also they want them now. Customers want the latest, the greatest, and they want these services to be reliable and stable with high quality of service levels. And they want them to be highly cost-effective. Hello and welcome to this preview of Mobile World Congress 2023. My name is Dave Vellante, and at this year's event, theCUBE has a major presence at the show made possible by Dell Technologies, and with me to unpack the trends in telco, and look ahead to MWC23 are Dennis Hoffman, he's the Senior Vice President and General Manager of Dell's telecom business, and Aaron Chaisson, who is the Vice President of Telecom and Edge Solutions Marketing at Dell Technologies, gentlemen, welcome, thanks so much for spending some time with me. >> Thank you, Dave. >> Thanks, glad to be here. >> So, Dennis, let's start with you. Telcos in recent history have been slow to deliver and to monetize new services, and a large part because their purpose-built infrastructure could been somewhat of a barrier to responding to all these market forces. In many ways, this is what makes telecoms, really this market so exciting. So from your perspective, where is the action in this space? >> Yeah, the action Dave is kind of all over the place, partly because it's an ecosystem play. I think it's been, as you point out, the disaggregation trend has been going on for a while. The opportunity's been clear, but it has taken a few years to get all of the vendors, and all of the components that make up a solution, as well as the operators themselves, to a point where we can start putting this stuff together, and actually achieving some of the promise. >> So Aaron, for those who might not be as familiar with Dell's a activities in this area, here we are just ahead of Mobile World Congress, it's the largest event for telecoms, what should people know about Dell? And what's the key message to this industry? >> Sure, yeah, I think everybody knows that there's a lot of innovation that's been happening in the industry of late. One of the major trends that we're seeing is that shift from more of a vertically-integrated technology stack, to more of a disaggregated set of solutions, and that trend has actually created a ton of innovation that's happening across the industry, or along technology vendors and providers, the telecoms themselves. And so, one of the things that Dell's really looking to do is, as Dennis talked about, is build out a really strong ecosystem of partners and vendors that we're working closely together to be able to collaborate on new technologies, new capabilities that are solving challenges that the networks are seeing today. Be able to create new solutions built on those in order to be able to bring new value to the industry. And then finally, we want to help both partners, as well as our CSP providers activate those changes, so that they can bring new solutions to market, to be able to serve their customers. And so, the key areas that we're really focusing on with our customers is, technologies to help modernize the network, to be able to capitalize on the value of open architectures, and bring price performance to what they're expecting, and availability that they're expecting today. And then also, partner with the lines of business to be able to take these new capabilities, produce new solutions, and then deliver new value to their customers. >> Great, thank you, Aaron. So Dennis, you and I, known you for a number of years. I've watched you, you're are a trend spotter. You're a strategic thinker. I love now the fact that you're running a business that you had to go out and analyze, and now you got to make it happen. So, how would you describe Dell's strategy in this market? >> Well, it's really two things. And I appreciate the comment, I'm not sure how much of a trend spotter I am, but I certainly enjoy, and I think I'm fascinated by what's going on in this industry right now. Our two main thrusts, Dave, are first round, trying to catalyze that ecosystem, be a force for pulling together a group of folks, vendors that have been flying in fairly loose formation for a couple of years, to deliver the kinds of solutions that move the needle forward, and produce the outcomes that our network operator customers can actually buy and consume, and deploy, and have them be supported. The other thing is, there's a couple of very key technology areas that need to be advanced here. This ends up being a much anticipated year in telecom. Because of the delivery of some open infrastructure solutions that have being developed for years. With the Intel Sapphire Rapids program coming to market, we've of course got some purpose-built solutions on top of that for telecommunications networks. Some expanded partnerships in the area of multi-cloud infrastructure. And so, I would say the second main thrust is, we've got to bring some intellectual property to the party. It's not just about pulling the ecosystem together. But those two things together really form the twin thrusts of our strategy. >> Okay, so as you point out, you obviously not going to go alone in this market, it's way too broad, there's so many routes to market, partnerships, obviously very, very important. So, can you share a little bit more about the ecosystem and partners, maybe give some examples of some of the key partners that you'd be highlighting or working with, maybe at Mobile World Congress, or other activities this year? >> Yeah, absolutely. As Aaron touched on, I'm a visual thinker. The way I think about this thing is a very, very vertical architecture is tipping sideways. It's becoming horizontal. And all of the layers of that horizontal architecture are really where the partnerships are at. So, let's start at the bottom, silicon. The silicon ecosystem is very much focused on this market. And producing very specific products to enable open, high performance telecom networks. That's both in the form of host processors, as well as accelerators. One layer up, of course, is the stuff that we're known for, subsystems, compute storage, the hardware infrastructure that forms the foundation for telco clouds. A layer above that, all of the cloud software layer, the virtualization and containerization software, and all of the usual suspects there, all of whom are very good partners of ours, and we're looking to expand that pretty broadly this year. And then at the top of the layer cake, all of the network functions, all of the VNF's and CNF's that were once kind of the top of proprietary stacks, that are now opening up and being delivered, as well-formed containers that can run on these clouds. So, we're focusing on all of those, if you will, product partnerships, and there is a services wrapper around all of it. The systems integration necessary to make these systems part of a carrier's network, which of course, has been running for a long time, and needs to be integrated with in a very specific way. And so, all of that, together kind of forms the ecosystem, all of those are partners, and we're really excited about being at the heart of it. >> Interesting, it's not like we've never seen this movie before, which is, it's sort of repeating itself in telco. Aaron, you heard my little intro up front about the need to modernize infrastructure, I wonder if I could touch on another major trend, which we're seeing is the cloud, and I'm talkin' about not only public, but private and hybrid cloud. The public cloud is an opportunity, but it's also a threat for telcos. Telcom providers are lookin' to the public cloud for specific use cases, you think about like bursting for an iPhone launch or whatever. But at the same time, these cloud vendors, they're sort of competing with telcos. They're providing local zones, for example, sometimes trying to do an end run on the telco connectivity services, so telecom companies, they have to find the right balance between what they own and what they rent. And I wonder if you could add some color as to what you see in the market and what Dell specifically is doing to support these trends. >> Yeah, and I think the most important thing is what we're seeing, as you said, is these aren't things that we haven't seen before. And I think that telecom is really going through their own set of cloud transformations, and so, one of the hot topics in the industry now is, what is telco cloud? And what does that look like going forward? And it's going to be, as you said, a combination of services that they offer, services that they leverage. But at the end of the day, it's going to help them modernize how they deliver telecommunication services to their customers, and then provide value added services on top of that. From a Dell perspective, we're really providing the technologies to provide the underpinnings to lay a foundation on which that network can be built, whether that's best of breed servers that are built in design for the telecom environments. Recently, we announced our Infer block program, in partnering with virtualization providers, to be able to provide engineered systems that dramatically simplify how our customers can deploy, manage, and lifecycle manage throughout day two operations, an entire cloud environment. And whether they're using Red Hat, whether they're using Wind River, or VMware, or other virtualization layers, they can deploy the right virtualization layer at the right part of their network to support the applications they're looking to drive. And Dell is looking to solve how they simplify and manage all of that, both from a hardware, as well as on management software perspective. So, this is really what Dell's doing to, again, partner with the broader technology community, to help make that telco cloud a reality. >> Aaron, let's stay here for a second, I'm interested in some of the use cases that you're going after with customers. You've got Edge infrastructure, remote work, 5G, where's security fit, what are the focus areas for Dell, and can we double click on that a little bit? >> Yeah, I mean, I think there's two main areas of telecommunication industry that we're talking to. One, we've really been talking about the sort of the network buyer, how do they modernize the core, the network Edge, the RAN capabilities to deliver traditional telecommunication services, and modernize that as they move into 5G and beyond. I think the other side of the business is, telecoms are really looking from a line of business perspective to figure out how do they monetize that network, and be able to deliver value added services to their enterprise customers on top of these new networks. So, you were just touching on a couple of things that are really critical. In the enterprise space, AI and IoT is driving a tremendous amount of innovation out there, and there's a need for being able to support and manage Edge compute at scale, be able to provide connectivity, like private mobility, and 4G and 5G, being able to support things like mobile workforces and client capabilities, to be able to access these devices that are around all of these Edge environments of the enterprises. And telecoms are seeing as that, as an opportunity for them to not only provide connectivity, but how do they extend their cloud out into these enterprise environments with compute, with connectivity, with client and connectivity resources, and even also provide protection for those environments as well. So, these are areas that Dell is historically very strong at. Being able to provide compute, be able to provide connectivity, and being able to provide data protection and client services, we are looking to work closely with lines of businesses to be able to develop solutions that they can bring to market in combination with us, to be able to serve their end user customers and their enterprises. So, those are really the two key areas, not only network buyer, but being able to enable the lines of business to go and capitalize on the services they're developing for their customers. >> I think that line of business aspect is key, I mean, the telcos have had to sit back and provide the plumbing, cost per bit goes down, data consumption going through the roof, all the over at the top guys have had the field day with the data, and the customer relationships, and now it's almost like the revenge (chuckles) of the telcos. Dennis, I wonder if we could talk about the future. What can we expect in the years ahead from Dell, if you break out the binoculars a little bit. >> Yeah, I think you hit it earlier. We've seen the movie before. This has happened in the IT data center. We went from proprietary vertical solutions to horizontal open systems. We went from client server to software-defined open hardware cloud native. And the trend is likely to be exactly that, in the telecom industry because that's what the operators want. They're not naive to what's happened in the IT data center, they all run very large data centers. And they're trying to get some of the scale economies. Some of the agility, the cost of ownership benefits for the reasons Aaron just discussed. It's clear as you point out, this industry's been really defined by the inability to stop investing, and the difficulty to monetize that investment. And I think now, everybody's looking at this 5G, and frankly, 5G plus 6G, and beyond, as the opportunity to really go get a chunk of that revenue, and Enterprise Edge is the target. >> And 5G is touching so many industries, and that kind of brings me, Aaron into Mobile World Congress. I mean, you look at the floor layout, it's amazing. You got Industry 4.0, you've got our traditional industry and telco colliding. There's public policy. So, give us a teaser to Mobile World Congress 23, what's on deck at the show from Dell? >> Yeah, we're really excited about Mobile World Congress. This, as you know, is a massive event for the industry every year. And it's really the event that the whole industry uses to kick off this coming year. So, we're going to be using this obviously to talk to our customers and our partners about what Dell's looking to do, and what we're innovating on right now, and what we're looking to partner with them around. In the front of the house, we're going to be doin', we're going to be highlighting 13 different solutions and demonstrations to be able to show our customers what we're doing today, and show them the use cases, and put into action, so they get to actually look and feel, and touch, and experience what it is that we're working around. Obviously, meetings are important, everybody knows Mobile World Congress is the place to get those meetings and kickoff for the year. So, we're going to have, we're lookin' at several hundred meetings, hundreds of meetings that we're going to be lookin' to have across the industry with our customers and partners in the broader community. And of course, we've also got technology that's going to be in a variety of different partner spaces as well. So, you can come and see us in hall three, but we're also going to have technologies, kind of spread all over the floor. And of course, there's always theCUBE. You're going to be able to see us live all four days, all day, every day. You're going to be hearing our executives, our partners, our customers, talk about what Dell is doing to innovate in the industry, and how we're looking to leverage the broader, open ecosystem to be able to transform the network, and what we're lookin' to do. So, in that space, we're going to be focusing on what we're doing from an ecosystem perspective, our infrastructure focus. We'll be talking about what we're doing to support telco cloud transformation. And then finally, as we talked about earlier, how are we helping the lines of business within our telecoms monetize the opportunity? So, these are all different things we're really excited to be focusing on, and look forward to the event next month. >> Yeah, it's going to be awesome in Barcelona at the FITA, as you say, Dell's big presence in hall three, Orange is in there, Deutsche Telecom, Intel's in hall three. VMware's there, Nokia, Vodafone, you got some great things to see there. Check that out, and of course, theCUBE, we are super excited to be collaborating with you, we got a great setup. We're in the walkway right between halls four and five, right across from the government of Catalonia, who are the host partners for the event, so there's going to be a ton of action there. Guys, can't wait to see you there, really appreciate your time today. >> Great, thanks. >> Alright, Mobile World Congress, theCUBE's coverage starts on February 27th right after the keynotes. So, first thing in the morning, east coast time, we'll be broadcasting is, Aaron said all week, Monday through Thursday in the show floor, check that out at thecube.net. siliconangle.com has all the written coverage, and go to dell.com, see what's happenin' there, have all the action from the event. Don't miss us, this is Dave Vellante, we'll see you there. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
and one of the most important and to monetize new and all of the components the network, to be able to capitalize on I love now the fact that Because of the delivery of some open examples of some of the key and all of the usual suspects there, about the need to the applications they're looking to drive. I'm interested in some of the use cases the lines of business to go and capitalize I mean, the telcos have had to sit back and the difficulty to and that kind of brings me, Aaron and kickoff for the year. awesome in Barcelona at the FITA, and go to dell.com, see
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aaron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aaron Chaisson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
February 27th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Orange | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Deutsche Telecom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first round | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
next month | DATE | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
13 different solutions | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
thecube.net. | OTHER | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Mobile World Congress 23 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One layer | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
both partners | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Mobile World Congress 2023 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
MWC23 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
twin thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two key areas | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
two main thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
second main thrust | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.93+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.92+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
a trillion-dollar | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Telcom | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
hall three | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
dell.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Mobile Word Congress Preview 2023 | Mobile Word Congress 2023
(upbeat music) >> Telecommunic^ations is well north of a trillion-dollar business globally that provides critical services on which virtually everyone on the planet relies. Dramatic changes are occurring in the sector, and one of the most important dimensions of this change is the underlying infrastructure that powers global telecommunications networks. Telcos have been thawing out, if you will, their frozen infrastructure, modernizing. They're opening up. They're disaggregating their infrastructure, separating, for example, the control plane from the data plane and adopting open standards. Telco infrastructure is becoming software-defined, and leading telcos are adopting cloud-native microservices to help make developers more productive, so they can respond more quickly to market changes. They're embracing technology consumption models and selectively leveraging the cloud where it makes sense, and these changes are being driven by market forces, the root of which stem from customer demand. So from a customer's perspective, they want services, and they want them fast, meaning not only at high speeds, but also they want them now. Customers want the latest, the greatest, and they want these services to be reliable and stable with high quality of service levels, and they want them to be highly cost effective. Hello and welcome to this preview of Mobile World Congress 2023. My name is Dave Vellante and at this year's event, theCUBE has a major presence at the show, made possible by Dell Technologies, and with me, to unpack the trends in Telco and look ahead to MWC 23, Dennis Hoffman. He's the senior vice-president and general manager of Dell's telecom business and Aaron Chaisson, who is the vice-president of telecom and edge solutions marketing at Dell Technologies. Gentlemen, welcome. Thanks so much for spending some time with me. >> Thank you, Dave. >> Thanks, glad to be here. So, Dennis, let's start with you. Telcos in recent history have been slow to deliver and to monetize new services, in a large part, because their purpose-built infrastructure can been somewhat of a barrier to respondent to these market forces. In many ways, this is what makes telecoms, really, this market, so exciting. So from your perspective, where is the action in this space? >> Yeah, the action, Dave, is kind of all over the place, partly because it's an ecosystem play. You know, I think it's been, as you point out, the disaggregation trend has been going on for a while. The opportunity's been clear, but it has taken a few years to get all of the vendors and all of the components that make up a solution, as well as the operators themselves, to a point where we can start putting this stuff together and actually achieving some of the promise. >> So, Aaron, for those who might not be as familiar with Dell's a activities in this area, you know, here we are just ahead of Mobile World Congress. It's the largest event for telecoms. What should people know about Dell, and what's the key message to this industry? >> Sure, yeah, I think everybody knows that there's a lot of innovation that's been happening in the industry of late. One of the major trends that we're seeing is that shift from more of a vertically-integrated technology stack to more of a disaggregated set of solutions, and that trend has actually created a ton of innovation that's happening across the industry, well, along technology vendors and providers, the telecoms themselves, and so one of the things that Dell's really looking to do is, as Dennis talked about, is build out a really strong ecosystem of partners and vendors that we're working closely together to be able to collaborate on new technologies, new capabilities, that are solving challenges that the networks are seeing today, be able to create new solutions built on those in order to be able to bring new value to the industry and then finally, we want to help both partners as well as our CSP providers activate those changes so that they can bring new solutions to market to be able to serve their customers, and so the key areas that we're really focusing on, with our customers, is technologies to help modernize the network to be able to capitalize on the value of open architectures and bring price performance to what they're expecting and availability that they're expecting today and then also partner with the lines of business to be able to take these new capabilities, produce new solutions and then deliver new value to their customers. >> Great, thank you, Aaron. So, Dennis, I have known you for a number of years. I've watched you. You are a trend spotter, and you're a strategic thinker, and I love now the fact that you're running a business that you had to go out and analyze, and now you got got to make it happen. So how would you describe Dell's strategy in this market? >> Well, it's really two things, and I appreciate the comment. I'm not sure how much of a trend spotter I am, but I certainly enjoy, and I think I'm fascinated by what's going on in this industry right now. Our two main thrusts, Dave, are, first round, trying to catalyze that ecosystem, you know, be a force for pulling together a group of folks, vendors, that have been flying in fairly loose formation for a couple of years to deliver the kinds of solutions that move the needle forward and produce the outcomes that our network-operator customers can actually buy, and consume, and deploy, and have them be supported. The other thing is there's a couple of very key technology areas that need to be advanced here. This ends up being a much anticipated year, in telecom, because of the delivery of some open infrastructure solutions that have been being developed for years, with the Intel Sapphire Rapids program coming to market. We've of course got some purpose-built solutions on top of that for telecommunications networks, some expanded partnerships in the area of multi-cloud infrastructure, and so I would say the second main thrust is we've got to bring some intellectual property to the party. It's not just about pulling the ecosystem together, but those two things together really form the twin thrusts of our strategy. >> Okay, so as you point out, you're obviously not going to go alone in this market. It's way too broad. There's so many routes to market, partnerships, obviously, very, very important. So can you share a little bit more about the ecosystem and partners, maybe give some examples of some of the key partners that you'd be highlighting or working with, maybe at Mobile World Congress or other activities this year? >> Yeah, absolutely. You know, as Aaron touched on. I'm a visual thinker. The way I think about this thing is a very, very vertical architecture is tipping sideways. It's becoming horizontal, and all of the layers of that horizontal architecture are really where the partnerships are at. So let's start at the bottom, silicon. The silicon ecosystem is very much focused on this market and producing very specific products to enable open, high-performance telecom networks. That's both in the form of host processors as well as accelerators. One layer up, of course, is the stuff that we're known for, subsystems, compute, storage, the hardware infrastructure that forms the foundation for telco clouds. A layer above that, all of the cloud software layer, the virtualization and containerization software and all of the usual suspects there, all of whom are very good partners of ours, and we're looking to expand that pretty broadly this year, and then at the top of the layer cake, all of the network functions, all of the VNFs and CNFs that were once kind of the top of proprietary stacks that are now opening up and being delivered as well-formed containers that can run on these clouds. So, you know, we're focusing on all of those, if you will, product partnerships, and there is a services wrapper around all of it, the systems integration necessary to make these systems part of a carrier's network, which, of course, has been running for a long time and needs to be integrated with in a very specific way, and so all of that together kind of forms the ecosystem. All of those are partners, and we're really excited about being at the heart of it. >> Interesting, it's not like we've never seen this movie before, which is sort of repeating itself in telco. Aaron, you heard my little intro up front about the need to modernize infrastructure. I wonder if I could touch on, you know, another major trend which we're seeing, is the cloud, and I'm talking about, not only public, but private and hybrid cloud. The public cloud is an opportunity, but it's also a threat for telcos. You know, telecom providers are looking to the public cloud for specific use cases. You think about, like, bursting for an iPhone launch or whatever but at the same time, these cloud vendors, they're sort of competing with telcos. They're providing, you know, local zones, for example, sometimes trying to do an end run on the telco connectivity services. So telecom companies, they have to find the right balance between what they own and what they rent, and I wonder if you could add some color as to what you see in the market and what Dell, specifically, is doing to support these trends. >> Yeah, I think the most important thing is what we're seeing, as you said, is these aren't things that we haven't seen before, and I think that telecom is really going through their own set of cloud transformations, and so one of the hot topics in the industry now is what is telco cloud and what does that look like going forward? And it's going to be a, as you said, a combination of services that they offer, services that they leverage, but at the end of the day, it's going to help them modernize how they deliver telecommunication services to their customers and then provide value-added services on top of that. From a Dell perspective, you know, we're really providing the technologies to provide the underpinnings to lay a foundation on which that network can be built, whether that's best-of-breed servers that are built and designed for the telecom environments. Recently we announced our, our Infra Block program in partnering with virtualization providers to be able to provide engineered systems that dramatically simplify how our customers can deploy, manage and lifecycle-manage throughout day-two operations, an entire cloud environment, and whether they're using Red Hat, whether they're using Wind River or VMware or other virtualization layers, they can deploy the right virtualization layer at the right part of their network to support the applications they're looking to drive, and Dell is looking to solve how they simplify and manage all of that, both from a hardware as well as a management software perspective. So this is really what Dell's doing to, again, partner with the broader technology community to help make that telco cloud a reality. >> Aaron, let's stay here for a second. I'm interested in some of the use cases that you're going after with customers. You've got edge infrastructure, remote work, 5G. Where's security fit? What are the focus areas for Dell, and can we double-click on that a little bit? >> Yeah, I mean, I think there's two main areas of telecommunication industry that we're talking to. One, we've really been talking about sort of the network buyer, how do they modernize the core, the network edge, the RAN capabilities, to deliver traditional telecommunication services and modernize that as they move into 5G and beyond. I think the other side of the business is telecoms are really looking, from a line of business perspective, to figure out how do they monetize that network and be able to deliver value-added services to their enterprise customers on top of these new networks. So you were just touching on a couple of things that are really critical. You know, in the enterprise space, AI and IoT is driving a tremendous amount of innovation out there, and there's a need for being able to support and manage edge compute at scale, be able to provide connectivity, like private mobility and 4G and 5G, being able to support things like mobile workforces and client capabilities to be able to access these devices that are around all of these edge environments of the enterprises, and telecoms are seen as that, as an opportunity for them to not only provide connectivity, but how do they extend their cloud out into these enterprise environments with compute, with connectivity, with client and connectivity resources, and even also provide protection for those environments as well. So these are areas that Dell's historically very strong at, being able to provide compute, being able to provide connectivity and being able to provide data protection and client services. We are looking to work closely with lines of businesses to be able to develop solutions that they can bring to market in combination with us to be able to serve their end user customers and their enterprises. So those are really the two key areas, not only network buyer, but being able to enable the lines of business to go and capitalize on the services they're developing for their customers. >> I think that line of business aspect is key. I mean, the telcos have had to sit back and provide the plumbing. Cost per bit goes down. Data consumption going through the roof. All the way over to the top guys, you know, had the field day with the data and the customer relationships, and now it's almost like the revenge of the telcos. (chuckles) Dennis, I wonder if we could talk about the future. What can we expect in the years ahead from Dell, if you, you know, break out the binoculars a little bit? >> Yeah, I think you hit it earlier. We've seen the movie before. This has happened in the IT data center. We went from proprietary vertical solutions to horizontal open systems. We went from client server to software-defined, open-hardware, cloud-native and you know, the trend is likely to be exactly that, in the telecom industry, because that's what the operators want. They're not naive to what's happened in the IT data center. They all run very large data centers, and they're trying to get some of the scale economies, some of the agility, the cost of ownership benefits for the reasons Aaron just discussed. You know, it's clear, as you point out, this industry's been really defined by the inability to stop investing and the difficulty to monetize that investment, and I think now everybody's looking at this 5G, and, frankly, 5G plus, 6G and beyond, as the opportunity to really go get a chunk of that revenue, and enterprise edge is the target. >> And 5G is touching so many industries, and that kind of brings me here into Mobile World Congress. I mean, you look at the floor layout, it's amazing. You got industry 4.0. You've got, you know, our traditional industry and telco colliding. There's public policy. So give us a teaser to Mobile World Congress '23. What's on deck at the show for from Dell? >> Yeah, we're really excited about Mobile World Congress. This, as you know, is a massive event for the industry every year, and it's really the event that the whole industry uses to kick off this coming year. So we're going to be using this, obviously, to talk to our customers and our partners about what Dell's looking to do and what we're innovating on right now, and what we're looking to partner with them around. In the front of the house, we're going to be highlighting 13 different solutions and demonstrations to be able to show our customers what we're doing today and show them the use cases and put it into action, so they get to actually look and feel and touch and experience what it is that we're working around. Obviously, meetings are important. Everybody knows Mobile World Congress is the place to get those meetings and kick off for the year. You know, we're looking at several hundred meetings, hundreds of meetings that we're going to be looking to have across the industry with our customers and partners and the broader community, and, of course, we've also got technology that's going to be in a variety of different partner spaces as well. So you can come and see us in hall three, but we're also going to have technologies kind of spread all over the floor, and, of course, there's always theCUBE. You're going to be able to see us live all four days, all day, every day. You're going to be hearing our executives, our partners, our customers, talk about, you know, what Dell is doing to innovate in the industry and how we're looking to leverage the broader open ecosystem to be able to transform, you know, the network and what we're looking to do. So in that space, we're going to be focusing on what we're doing from an ecosystem perspective, our infrastructure focus. We'll be talking about what we're doing to support telco cloud transformation and then finally, as we talked about earlier, how are we helping the lines of business within our telecoms monetize the opportunity. So these are all different things we're really excited to be focusing on and look forward to the event next month. >> Yeah, it's going to be awesome In Barcelona at the Fira. As you say, Dell's big presence in Hall three. Orange is in there, Deutsche Telekom. Intel's in Hall three. VMware's there, Nokia, Vodafone. You got great things to see there. Check that out and of course, theCUBE, we are super excited to be collaborating with you. We got a great setup. We're in the walkway, right between halls four and five, right across from the Government of Catalonia, who are the host partners for the event. So there's going to be a ton of action there. Guys, can't wait to see you there. Really appreciate your time today. >> Great, thanks. >> All right, Mobile World Congress, theCUBE's coverage starts on February 27th, right after the keynotes. So first thing in the morning, East coast time, we'll be broadcasting, as Aaron said, all week, Monday through Thursday, on the show floor. Check that out at thecube.net. Siliconangle.com has all the written coverage, and go to dell.com, see what's happening there. Have all the action from the event. Don't miss us. This is Dave Vellante. We'll see you there. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and one of the most important dimensions and to monetize new and all of the components It's the largest event for telecoms. the network to be able to and I love now the fact that of solutions that move the of some of the key partners and all of the layers about the need to and so one of the hot topics I'm interested in some of the use cases the lines of business to go and capitalize and now it's almost like the revenge as the opportunity to really What's on deck at the show for from Dell? and partners and the broader community, So there's going to be and go to dell.com, see
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Aaron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aaron Chaisson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
February 27th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Orange | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thecube.net | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
13 different solutions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
next month | DATE | 0.99+ |
two key areas | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.98+ |
first round | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Deutsche Telekom | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Government of Catalonia | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Mobile Word Congress | EVENT | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
MWC 23 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Mobile World Congress 2023 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two main areas | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
both partners | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
twin thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Red Hat | TITLE | 0.93+ |
One layer | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Fira | LOCATION | 0.91+ |
a trillion-dollar | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
hundred meetings | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Mobile World Congress '23 | EVENT | 0.83+ |
two main thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.8+ |
Breaking Analysis: ChatGPT Won't Give OpenAI First Mover Advantage
>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> OpenAI The company, and ChatGPT have taken the world by storm. Microsoft reportedly is investing an additional 10 billion dollars into the company. But in our view, while the hype around ChatGPT is justified, we don't believe OpenAI will lock up the market with its first mover advantage. Rather, we believe that success in this market will be directly proportional to the quality and quantity of data that a technology company has at its disposal, and the compute power that it could deploy to run its system. Hello and welcome to this week's Wikibon CUBE insights, powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we unpack the excitement around ChatGPT, and debate the premise that the company's early entry into the space may not confer winner take all advantage to OpenAI. And to do so, we welcome CUBE collaborator, alum, Sarbjeet Johal, (chuckles) and John Furrier, co-host of the Cube. Great to see you Sarbjeet, John. Really appreciate you guys coming to the program. >> Great to be on. >> Okay, so what is ChatGPT? Well, actually we asked ChatGPT, what is ChatGPT? So here's what it said. ChatGPT is a state-of-the-art language model developed by OpenAI that can generate human-like text. It could be fine tuned for a variety of language tasks, such as conversation, summarization, and language translation. So I asked it, give it to me in 50 words or less. How did it do? Anything to add? >> Yeah, think it did good. It's large language model, like previous models, but it started applying the transformers sort of mechanism to focus on what prompt you have given it to itself. And then also the what answer it gave you in the first, sort of, one sentence or two sentences, and then introspect on itself, like what I have already said to you. And so just work on that. So it it's self sort of focus if you will. It does, the transformers help the large language models to do that. >> So to your point, it's a large language model, and GPT stands for generative pre-trained transformer. >> And if you put the definition back up there again, if you put it back up on the screen, let's see it back up. Okay, it actually missed the large, word large. So one of the problems with ChatGPT, it's not always accurate. It's actually a large language model, and it says state of the art language model. And if you look at Google, Google has dominated AI for many times and they're well known as being the best at this. And apparently Google has their own large language model, LLM, in play and have been holding it back to release because of backlash on the accuracy. Like just in that example you showed is a great point. They got almost right, but they missed the key word. >> You know what's funny about that John, is I had previously asked it in my prompt to give me it in less than a hundred words, and it was too long, I said I was too long for Breaking Analysis, and there it went into the fact that it's a large language model. So it largely, it gave me a really different answer the, for both times. So, but it's still pretty amazing for those of you who haven't played with it yet. And one of the best examples that I saw was Ben Charrington from This Week In ML AI podcast. And I stumbled on this thanks to Brian Gracely, who was listening to one of his Cloudcasts. Basically what Ben did is he took, he prompted ChatGPT to interview ChatGPT, and he simply gave the system the prompts, and then he ran the questions and answers into this avatar builder and sped it up 2X so it didn't sound like a machine. And voila, it was amazing. So John is ChatGPT going to take over as a cube host? >> Well, I was thinking, we get the questions in advance sometimes from PR people. We should actually just plug it in ChatGPT, add it to our notes, and saying, "Is this good enough for you? Let's ask the real question." So I think, you know, I think there's a lot of heavy lifting that gets done. I think the ChatGPT is a phenomenal revolution. I think it highlights the use case. Like that example we showed earlier. It gets most of it right. So it's directionally correct and it feels like it's an answer, but it's not a hundred percent accurate. And I think that's where people are seeing value in it. Writing marketing, copy, brainstorming, guest list, gift list for somebody. Write me some lyrics to a song. Give me a thesis about healthcare policy in the United States. It'll do a bang up job, and then you got to go in and you can massage it. So we're going to do three quarters of the work. That's why plagiarism and schools are kind of freaking out. And that's why Microsoft put 10 billion in, because why wouldn't this be a feature of Word, or the OS to help it do stuff on behalf of the user. So linguistically it's a beautiful thing. You can input a string and get a good answer. It's not a search result. >> And we're going to get your take on on Microsoft and, but it kind of levels the playing- but ChatGPT writes better than I do, Sarbjeet, and I know you have some good examples too. You mentioned the Reed Hastings example. >> Yeah, I was listening to Reed Hastings fireside chat with ChatGPT, and the answers were coming as sort of voice, in the voice format. And it was amazing what, he was having very sort of philosophy kind of talk with the ChatGPT, the longer sentences, like he was going on, like, just like we are talking, he was talking for like almost two minutes and then ChatGPT was answering. It was not one sentence question, and then a lot of answers from ChatGPT and yeah, you're right. I, this is our ability. I've been thinking deep about this since yesterday, we talked about, like, we want to do this segment. The data is fed into the data model. It can be the current data as well, but I think that, like, models like ChatGPT, other companies will have those too. They can, they're democratizing the intelligence, but they're not creating intelligence yet, definitely yet I can say that. They will give you all the finite answers. Like, okay, how do you do this for loop in Java, versus, you know, C sharp, and as a programmer you can do that, in, but they can't tell you that, how to write a new algorithm or write a new search algorithm for you. They cannot create a secretive code for you to- >> Not yet. >> Have competitive advantage. >> Not yet, not yet. >> but you- >> Can Google do that today? >> No one really can. The reasoning side of the data is, we talked about at our Supercloud event, with Zhamak Dehghani who's was CEO of, now of Nextdata. This next wave of data intelligence is going to come from entrepreneurs that are probably cross discipline, computer science and some other discipline. But they're going to be new things, for example, data, metadata, and data. It's hard to do reasoning like a human being, so that needs more data to train itself. So I think the first gen of this training module for the large language model they have is a corpus of text. Lot of that's why blog posts are, but the facts are wrong and sometimes out of context, because that contextual reasoning takes time, it takes intelligence. So machines need to become intelligent, and so therefore they need to be trained. So you're going to start to see, I think, a lot of acceleration on training the data sets. And again, it's only as good as the data you can get. And again, proprietary data sets will be a huge winner. Anyone who's got a large corpus of content, proprietary content like theCUBE or SiliconANGLE as a publisher will benefit from this. Large FinTech companies, anyone with large proprietary data will probably be a big winner on this generative AI wave, because it just, it will eat that up, and turn that back into something better. So I think there's going to be a lot of interesting things to look at here. And certainly productivity's going to be off the charts for vanilla and the internet is going to get swarmed with vanilla content. So if you're in the content business, and you're an original content producer of any kind, you're going to be not vanilla, so you're going to be better. So I think there's so much at play Dave (indistinct). >> I think the playing field has been risen, so we- >> Risen and leveled? >> Yeah, and leveled to certain extent. So it's now like that few people as consumers, as consumers of AI, we will have a advantage and others cannot have that advantage. So it will be democratized. That's, I'm sure about that. But if you take the example of calculator, when the calculator came in, and a lot of people are, "Oh, people can't do math anymore because calculator is there." right? So it's a similar sort of moment, just like a calculator for the next level. But, again- >> I see it more like open source, Sarbjeet, because like if you think about what ChatGPT's doing, you do a query and it comes from somewhere the value of a post from ChatGPT is just a reuse of AI. The original content accent will be come from a human. So if I lay out a paragraph from ChatGPT, did some heavy lifting on some facts, I check the facts, save me about maybe- >> Yeah, it's productive. >> An hour writing, and then I write a killer two, three sentences of, like, sharp original thinking or critical analysis. I then took that body of work, open source content, and then laid something on top of it. >> And Sarbjeet's example is a good one, because like if the calculator kids don't do math as well anymore, the slide rule, remember we had slide rules as kids, remember we first started using Waze, you know, we were this minority and you had an advantage over other drivers. Now Waze is like, you know, social traffic, you know, navigation, everybody had, you know- >> All the back roads are crowded. >> They're car crowded. (group laughs) Exactly. All right, let's, let's move on. What about this notion that futurist Ray Amara put forth and really Amara's Law that we're showing here, it's, the law is we, you know, "We tend to overestimate the effect of technology in the short run and underestimate it in the long run." Is that the case, do you think, with ChatGPT? What do you think Sarbjeet? >> I think that's true actually. There's a lot of, >> We don't debate this. >> There's a lot of awe, like when people see the results from ChatGPT, they say what, what the heck? Like, it can do this? But then if you use it more and more and more, and I ask the set of similar question, not the same question, and it gives you like same answer. It's like reading from the same bucket of text in, the interior read (indistinct) where the ChatGPT, you will see that in some couple of segments. It's very, it sounds so boring that the ChatGPT is coming out the same two sentences every time. So it is kind of good, but it's not as good as people think it is right now. But we will have, go through this, you know, hype sort of cycle and get realistic with it. And then in the long term, I think it's a great thing in the short term, it's not something which will (indistinct) >> What's your counter point? You're saying it's not. >> I, no I think the question was, it's hyped up in the short term and not it's underestimated long term. That's what I think what he said, quote. >> Yes, yeah. That's what he said. >> Okay, I think that's wrong with this, because this is a unique, ChatGPT is a unique kind of impact and it's very generational. People have been comparing it, I have been comparing to the internet, like the web, web browser Mosaic and Netscape, right, Navigator. I mean, I clearly still remember the days seeing Navigator for the first time, wow. And there weren't not many sites you could go to, everyone typed in, you know, cars.com, you know. >> That (indistinct) wasn't that overestimated, the overhyped at the beginning and underestimated. >> No, it was, it was underestimated long run, people thought. >> But that Amara's law. >> That's what is. >> No, they said overestimated? >> Overestimated near term underestimated- overhyped near term, underestimated long term. I got, right I mean? >> Well, I, yeah okay, so I would then agree, okay then- >> We were off the charts about the internet in the early days, and it actually exceeded our expectations. >> Well there were people who were, like, poo-pooing it early on. So when the browser came out, people were like, "Oh, the web's a toy for kids." I mean, in 1995 the web was a joke, right? So '96, you had online populations growing, so you had structural changes going on around the browser, internet population. And then that replaced other things, direct mail, other business activities that were once analog then went to the web, kind of read only as you, as we always talk about. So I think that's a moment where the hype long term, the smart money, and the smart industry experts all get the long term. And in this case, there's more poo-pooing in the short term. "Ah, it's not a big deal, it's just AI." I've heard many people poo-pooing ChatGPT, and a lot of smart people saying, "No this is next gen, this is different and it's only going to get better." So I think people are estimating a big long game on this one. >> So you're saying it's bifurcated. There's those who say- >> Yes. >> Okay, all right, let's get to the heart of the premise, and possibly the debate for today's episode. Will OpenAI's early entry into the market confer sustainable competitive advantage for the company. And if you look at the history of tech, the technology industry, it's kind of littered with first mover failures. Altair, IBM, Tandy, Commodore, they and Apple even, they were really early in the PC game. They took a backseat to Dell who came in the scene years later with a better business model. Netscape, you were just talking about, was all the rage in Silicon Valley, with the first browser, drove up all the housing prices out here. AltaVista was the first search engine to really, you know, index full text. >> Owned by Dell, I mean DEC. >> Owned by Digital. >> Yeah, Digital Equipment >> Compaq bought it. And of course as an aside, Digital, they wanted to showcase their hardware, right? Their super computer stuff. And then so Friendster and MySpace, they came before Facebook. The iPhone certainly wasn't the first mobile device. So lots of failed examples, but there are some recent successes like AWS and cloud. >> You could say smartphone. So I mean. >> Well I know, and you can, we can parse this so we'll debate it. Now Twitter, you could argue, had first mover advantage. You kind of gave me that one John. Bitcoin and crypto clearly had first mover advantage, and sustaining that. Guys, will OpenAI make it to the list on the right with ChatGPT, what do you think? >> I think categorically as a company, it probably won't, but as a category, I think what they're doing will, so OpenAI as a company, they get funding, there's power dynamics involved. Microsoft put a billion dollars in early on, then they just pony it up. Now they're reporting 10 billion more. So, like, if the browsers, Microsoft had competitive advantage over Netscape, and used monopoly power, and convicted by the Department of Justice for killing Netscape with their monopoly, Netscape should have had won that battle, but Microsoft killed it. In this case, Microsoft's not killing it, they're buying into it. So I think the embrace extend Microsoft power here makes OpenAI vulnerable for that one vendor solution. So the AI as a company might not make the list, but the category of what this is, large language model AI, is probably will be on the right hand side. >> Okay, we're going to come back to the government intervention and maybe do some comparisons, but what are your thoughts on this premise here? That, it will basically set- put forth the premise that it, that ChatGPT, its early entry into the market will not confer competitive advantage to >> For OpenAI. >> To Open- Yeah, do you agree with that? >> I agree with that actually. It, because Google has been at it, and they have been holding back, as John said because of the scrutiny from the Fed, right, so- >> And privacy too. >> And the privacy and the accuracy as well. But I think Sam Altman and the company on those guys, right? They have put this in a hasty way out there, you know, because it makes mistakes, and there are a lot of questions around the, sort of, where the content is coming from. You saw that as your example, it just stole the content, and without your permission, you know? >> Yeah. So as quick this aside- >> And it codes on people's behalf and the, those codes are wrong. So there's a lot of, sort of, false information it's putting out there. So it's a very vulnerable thing to do what Sam Altman- >> So even though it'll get better, others will compete. >> So look, just side note, a term which Reid Hoffman used a little bit. Like he said, it's experimental launch, like, you know, it's- >> It's pretty damn good. >> It is clever because according to Sam- >> It's more than clever. It's good. >> It's awesome, if you haven't used it. I mean you write- you read what it writes and you go, "This thing writes so well, it writes so much better than you." >> The human emotion drives that too. I think that's a big thing. But- >> I Want to add one more- >> Make your last point. >> Last one. Okay. So, but he's still holding back. He's conducting quite a few interviews. If you want to get the gist of it, there's an interview with StrictlyVC interview from yesterday with Sam Altman. Listen to that one it's an eye opening what they want- where they want to take it. But my last one I want to make it on this point is that Satya Nadella yesterday did an interview with Wall Street Journal. I think he was doing- >> You were not impressed. >> I was not impressed because he was pushing it too much. So Sam Altman's holding back so there's less backlash. >> Got 10 billion reasons to push. >> I think he's almost- >> Microsoft just laid off 10000 people. Hey ChatGPT, find me a job. You know like. (group laughs) >> He's overselling it to an extent that I think it will backfire on Microsoft. And he's over promising a lot of stuff right now, I think. I don't know why he's very jittery about all these things. And he did the same thing during Ignite as well. So he said, "Oh, this AI will write code for you and this and that." Like you called him out- >> The hyperbole- >> During your- >> from Satya Nadella, he's got a lot of hyperbole. (group talks over each other) >> All right, Let's, go ahead. >> Well, can I weigh in on the whole- >> Yeah, sure. >> Microsoft thing on whether OpenAI, here's the take on this. I think it's more like the browser moment to me, because I could relate to that experience with ChatG, personally, emotionally, when I saw that, and I remember vividly- >> You mean that aha moment (indistinct). >> Like this is obviously the future. Anything else in the old world is dead, website's going to be everywhere. It was just instant dot connection for me. And a lot of other smart people who saw this. Lot of people by the way, didn't see it. Someone said the web's a toy. At the company I was worked for at the time, Hewlett Packard, they like, they could have been in, they had invented HTML, and so like all this stuff was, like, they just passed, the web was just being passed over. But at that time, the browser got better, more websites came on board. So the structural advantage there was online web usage was growing, online user population. So that was growing exponentially with the rise of the Netscape browser. So OpenAI could stay on the right side of your list as durable, if they leverage the category that they're creating, can get the scale. And if they can get the scale, just like Twitter, that failed so many times that they still hung around. So it was a product that was always successful, right? So I mean, it should have- >> You're right, it was terrible, we kept coming back. >> The fail whale, but it still grew. So OpenAI has that moment. They could do it if Microsoft doesn't meddle too much with too much power as a vendor. They could be the Netscape Navigator, without the anti-competitive behavior of somebody else. So to me, they have the pole position. So they have an opportunity. So if not, if they don't execute, then there's opportunity. There's not a lot of barriers to entry, vis-a-vis say the CapEx of say a cloud company like AWS. You can't replicate that, Many have tried, but I think you can replicate OpenAI. >> And we're going to talk about that. Okay, so real quick, I want to bring in some ETR data. This isn't an ETR heavy segment, only because this so new, you know, they haven't coverage yet, but they do cover AI. So basically what we're seeing here is a slide on the vertical axis's net score, which is a measure of spending momentum, and in the horizontal axis's is presence in the dataset. Think of it as, like, market presence. And in the insert right there, you can see how the dots are plotted, the two columns. And so, but the key point here that we want to make, there's a bunch of companies on the left, is he like, you know, DataRobot and C3 AI and some others, but the big whales, Google, AWS, Microsoft, are really dominant in this market. So that's really the key takeaway that, can we- >> I notice IBM is way low. >> Yeah, IBM's low, and actually bring that back up and you, but then you see Oracle who actually is injecting. So I guess that's the other point is, you're not necessarily going to go buy AI, and you know, build your own AI, you're going to, it's going to be there and, it, Salesforce is going to embed it into its platform, the SaaS companies, and you're going to purchase AI. You're not necessarily going to build it. But some companies obviously are. >> I mean to quote IBM's general manager Rob Thomas, "You can't have AI with IA." information architecture and David Flynn- >> You can't Have AI without IA >> without, you can't have AI without IA. You can't have, if you have an Information Architecture, you then can power AI. Yesterday David Flynn, with Hammersmith, was on our Supercloud. He was pointing out that the relationship of storage, where you store things, also impacts the data and stressablity, and Zhamak from Nextdata, she was pointing out that same thing. So the data problem factors into all this too, Dave. >> So you got the big cloud and internet giants, they're all poised to go after this opportunity. Microsoft is investing up to 10 billion. Google's code red, which was, you know, the headline in the New York Times. Of course Apple is there and several alternatives in the market today. Guys like Chinchilla, Bloom, and there's a company Jasper and several others, and then Lena Khan looms large and the government's around the world, EU, US, China, all taking notice before the market really is coalesced around a single player. You know, John, you mentioned Netscape, they kind of really, the US government was way late to that game. It was kind of game over. And Netscape, I remember Barksdale was like, "Eh, we're going to be selling software in the enterprise anyway." and then, pshew, the company just dissipated. So, but it looks like the US government, especially with Lena Khan, they're changing the definition of antitrust and what the cause is to go after people, and they're really much more aggressive. It's only what, two years ago that (indistinct). >> Yeah, the problem I have with the federal oversight is this, they're always like late to the game, and they're slow to catch up. So in other words, they're working on stuff that should have been solved a year and a half, two years ago around some of the social networks hiding behind some of the rules around open web back in the days, and I think- >> But they're like 15 years late to that. >> Yeah, and now they got this new thing on top of it. So like, I just worry about them getting their fingers. >> But there's only two years, you know, OpenAI. >> No, but the thing (indistinct). >> No, they're still fighting other battles. But the problem with government is that they're going to label Big Tech as like a evil thing like Pharma, it's like smoke- >> You know Lena Khan wants to kill Big Tech, there's no question. >> So I think Big Tech is getting a very seriously bad rap. And I think anything that the government does that shades darkness on tech, is politically motivated in most cases. You can almost look at everything, and my 80 20 rule is in play here. 80% of the government activity around tech is bullshit, it's politically motivated, and the 20% is probably relevant, but off the mark and not organized. >> Well market forces have always been the determining factor of success. The governments, you know, have been pretty much failed. I mean you look at IBM's antitrust, that, what did that do? The market ultimately beat them. You look at Microsoft back in the day, right? Windows 95 was peaking, the government came in. But you know, like you said, they missed the web, right, and >> so they were hanging on- >> There's nobody in government >> to Windows. >> that actually knows- >> And so, you, I think you're right. It's market forces that are going to determine this. But Sarbjeet, what do you make of Microsoft's big bet here, you weren't impressed with with Nadella. How do you think, where are they going to apply it? Is this going to be a Hail Mary for Bing, or is it going to be applied elsewhere? What do you think. >> They are saying that they will, sort of, weave this into their products, office products, productivity and also to write code as well, developer productivity as well. That's a big play for them. But coming back to your antitrust sort of comments, right? I believe the, your comment was like, oh, fed was late 10 years or 15 years earlier, but now they're two years. But things are moving very fast now as compared to they used to move. >> So two years is like 10 Years. >> Yeah, two years is like 10 years. Just want to make that point. (Dave laughs) This thing is going like wildfire. Any new tech which comes in that I think they're going against distribution channels. Lina Khan has commented time and again that the marketplace model is that she wants to have some grip on. Cloud marketplaces are a kind of monopolistic kind of way. >> I don't, I don't see this, I don't see a Chat AI. >> You told me it's not Bing, you had an interesting comment. >> No, no. First of all, this is great from Microsoft. If you're Microsoft- >> Why? >> Because Microsoft doesn't have the AI chops that Google has, right? Google is got so much core competency on how they run their search, how they run their backends, their cloud, even though they don't get a lot of cloud market share in the enterprise, they got a kick ass cloud cause they needed one. >> Totally. >> They've invented SRE. I mean Google's development and engineering chops are off the scales, right? Amazon's got some good chops, but Google's got like 10 times more chops than AWS in my opinion. Cloud's a whole different story. Microsoft gets AI, they get a playbook, they get a product they can render into, the not only Bing, productivity software, helping people write papers, PowerPoint, also don't forget the cloud AI can super help. We had this conversation on our Supercloud event, where AI's going to do a lot of the heavy lifting around understanding observability and managing service meshes, to managing microservices, to turning on and off applications, and or maybe writing code in real time. So there's a plethora of use cases for Microsoft to deploy this. combined with their R and D budgets, they can then turbocharge more research, build on it. So I think this gives them a car in the game, Google may have pole position with AI, but this puts Microsoft right in the game, and they already have a lot of stuff going on. But this just, I mean everything gets lifted up. Security, cloud, productivity suite, everything. >> What's under the hood at Google, and why aren't they talking about it? I mean they got to be freaked out about this. No? Or do they have kind of a magic bullet? >> I think they have the, they have the chops definitely. Magic bullet, I don't know where they are, as compared to the ChatGPT 3 or 4 models. Like they, but if you look at the online sort of activity and the videos put out there from Google folks, Google technology folks, that's account you should look at if you are looking there, they have put all these distinctions what ChatGPT 3 has used, they have been talking about for a while as well. So it's not like it's a secret thing that you cannot replicate. As you said earlier, like in the beginning of this segment, that anybody who has more data and the capacity to process that data, which Google has both, I think they will win this. >> Obviously living in Palo Alto where the Google founders are, and Google's headquarters next town over we have- >> We're so close to them. We have inside information on some of the thinking and that hasn't been reported by any outlet yet. And that is, is that, from what I'm hearing from my sources, is Google has it, they don't want to release it for many reasons. One is it might screw up their search monopoly, one, two, they're worried about the accuracy, 'cause Google will get sued. 'Cause a lot of people are jamming on this ChatGPT as, "Oh it does everything for me." when it's clearly not a hundred percent accurate all the time. >> So Lina Kahn is looming, and so Google's like be careful. >> Yeah so Google's just like, this is the third, could be a third rail. >> But the first thing you said is a concern. >> Well no. >> The disruptive (indistinct) >> What they will do is do a Waymo kind of thing, where they spin out a separate company. >> They're doing that. >> The discussions happening, they're going to spin out the separate company and put it over there, and saying, "This is AI, got search over there, don't touch that search, 'cause that's where all the revenue is." (chuckles) >> So, okay, so that's how they deal with the Clay Christensen dilemma. What's the business model here? I mean it's not advertising, right? Is it to charge you for a query? What, how do you make money at this? >> It's a good question, I mean my thinking is, first of all, it's cool to type stuff in and see a paper get written, or write a blog post, or gimme a marketing slogan for this or that or write some code. I think the API side of the business will be critical. And I think Howie Xu, I know you're going to reference some of his comments yesterday on Supercloud, I think this brings a whole 'nother user interface into technology consumption. I think the business model, not yet clear, but it will probably be some sort of either API and developer environment or just a straight up free consumer product, with some sort of freemium backend thing for business. >> And he was saying too, it's natural language is the way in which you're going to interact with these systems. >> I think it's APIs, it's APIs, APIs, APIs, because these people who are cooking up these models, and it takes a lot of compute power to train these and to, for inference as well. Somebody did the analysis on the how many cents a Google search costs to Google, and how many cents the ChatGPT query costs. It's, you know, 100x or something on that. You can take a look at that. >> A 100x on which side? >> You're saying two orders of magnitude more expensive for ChatGPT >> Much more, yeah. >> Than for Google. >> It's very expensive. >> So Google's got the data, they got the infrastructure and they got, you're saying they got the cost (indistinct) >> No actually it's a simple query as well, but they are trying to put together the answers, and they're going through a lot more data versus index data already, you know. >> Let me clarify, you're saying that Google's version of ChatGPT is more efficient? >> No, I'm, I'm saying Google search results. >> Ah, search results. >> What are used to today, but cheaper. >> But that, does that, is that going to confer advantage to Google's large language (indistinct)? >> It will, because there were deep science (indistinct). >> Google, I don't think Google search is doing a large language model on their search, it's keyword search. You know, what's the weather in Santa Cruz? Or how, what's the weather going to be? Or you know, how do I find this? Now they have done a smart job of doing some things with those queries, auto complete, re direct navigation. But it's, it's not entity. It's not like, "Hey, what's Dave Vellante thinking this week in Breaking Analysis?" ChatGPT might get that, because it'll get your Breaking Analysis, it'll synthesize it. There'll be some, maybe some clips. It'll be like, you know, I mean. >> Well I got to tell you, I asked ChatGPT to, like, I said, I'm going to enter a transcript of a discussion I had with Nir Zuk, the CTO of Palo Alto Networks, And I want you to write a 750 word blog. I never input the transcript. It wrote a 750 word blog. It attributed quotes to him, and it just pulled a bunch of stuff that, and said, okay, here it is. It talked about Supercloud, it defined Supercloud. >> It's made, it makes you- >> Wow, But it was a big lie. It was fraudulent, but still, blew me away. >> Again, vanilla content and non accurate content. So we are going to see a surge of misinformation on steroids, but I call it the vanilla content. Wow, that's just so boring, (indistinct). >> There's so many dangers. >> Make your point, cause we got to, almost out of time. >> Okay, so the consumption, like how do you consume this thing. As humans, we are consuming it and we are, like, getting a nicely, like, surprisingly shocked, you know, wow, that's cool. It's going to increase productivity and all that stuff, right? And on the danger side as well, the bad actors can take hold of it and create fake content and we have the fake sort of intelligence, if you go out there. So that's one thing. The second thing is, we are as humans are consuming this as language. Like we read that, we listen to it, whatever format we consume that is, but the ultimate usage of that will be when the machines can take that output from likes of ChatGPT, and do actions based on that. The robots can work, the robot can paint your house, we were talking about, right? Right now we can't do that. >> Data apps. >> So the data has to be ingested by the machines. It has to be digestible by the machines. And the machines cannot digest unorganized data right now, we will get better on the ingestion side as well. So we are getting better. >> Data, reasoning, insights, and action. >> I like that mall, paint my house. >> So, okay- >> By the way, that means drones that'll come in. Spray painting your house. >> Hey, it wasn't too long ago that robots couldn't climb stairs, as I like to point out. Okay, and of course it's no surprise the venture capitalists are lining up to eat at the trough, as I'd like to say. Let's hear, you'd referenced this earlier, John, let's hear what AI expert Howie Xu said at the Supercloud event, about what it takes to clone ChatGPT. Please, play the clip. >> So one of the VCs actually asked me the other day, right? "Hey, how much money do I need to spend, invest to get a, you know, another shot to the openAI sort of the level." You know, I did a (indistinct) >> Line up. >> A hundred million dollar is the order of magnitude that I came up with, right? You know, not a billion, not 10 million, right? So a hundred- >> Guys a hundred million dollars, that's an astoundingly low figure. What do you make of it? >> I was in an interview with, I was interviewing, I think he said hundred million or so, but in the hundreds of millions, not a billion right? >> You were trying to get him up, you were like "Hundreds of millions." >> Well I think, I- >> He's like, eh, not 10, not a billion. >> Well first of all, Howie Xu's an expert machine learning. He's at Zscaler, he's a machine learning AI guy. But he comes from VMware, he's got his technology pedigrees really off the chart. Great friend of theCUBE and kind of like a CUBE analyst for us. And he's smart. He's right. I think the barriers to entry from a dollar standpoint are lower than say the CapEx required to compete with AWS. Clearly, the CapEx spending to build all the tech for the run a cloud. >> And you don't need a huge sales force. >> And in some case apps too, it's the same thing. But I think it's not that hard. >> But am I right about that? You don't need a huge sales force either. It's, what, you know >> If the product's good, it will sell, this is a new era. The better mouse trap will win. This is the new economics in software, right? So- >> Because you look at the amount of money Lacework, and Snyk, Snowflake, Databrooks. Look at the amount of money they've raised. I mean it's like a billion dollars before they get to IPO or more. 'Cause they need promotion, they need go to market. You don't need (indistinct) >> OpenAI's been working on this for multiple five years plus it's, hasn't, wasn't born yesterday. Took a lot of years to get going. And Sam is depositioning all the success, because he's trying to manage expectations, To your point Sarbjeet, earlier. It's like, yeah, he's trying to "Whoa, whoa, settle down everybody, (Dave laughs) it's not that great." because he doesn't want to fall into that, you know, hero and then get taken down, so. >> It may take a 100 million or 150 or 200 million to train the model. But to, for the inference to, yeah to for the inference machine, It will take a lot more, I believe. >> Give it, so imagine, >> Because- >> Go ahead, sorry. >> Go ahead. But because it consumes a lot more compute cycles and it's certain level of storage and everything, right, which they already have. So I think to compute is different. To frame the model is a different cost. But to run the business is different, because I think 100 million can go into just fighting the Fed. >> Well there's a flywheel too. >> Oh that's (indistinct) >> (indistinct) >> We are running the business, right? >> It's an interesting number, but it's also kind of, like, context to it. So here, a hundred million spend it, you get there, but you got to factor in the fact that the ways companies win these days is critical mass scale, hitting a flywheel. If they can keep that flywheel of the value that they got going on and get better, you can almost imagine a marketplace where, hey, we have proprietary data, we're SiliconANGLE in theCUBE. We have proprietary content, CUBE videos, transcripts. Well wouldn't it be great if someone in a marketplace could sell a module for us, right? We buy that, Amazon's thing and things like that. So if they can get a marketplace going where you can apply to data sets that may be proprietary, you can start to see this become bigger. And so I think the key barriers to entry is going to be success. I'll give you an example, Reddit. Reddit is successful and it's hard to copy, not because of the software. >> They built the moat. >> Because you can, buy Reddit open source software and try To compete. >> They built the moat with their community. >> Their community, their scale, their user expectation. Twitter, we referenced earlier, that thing should have gone under the first two years, but there was such a great emotional product. People would tolerate the fail whale. And then, you know, well that was a whole 'nother thing. >> Then a plane landed in (John laughs) the Hudson and it was over. >> I think verticals, a lot of verticals will build applications using these models like for lawyers, for doctors, for scientists, for content creators, for- >> So you'll have many hundreds of millions of dollars investments that are going to be seeping out. If, all right, we got to wrap, if you had to put odds on it that that OpenAI is going to be the leader, maybe not a winner take all leader, but like you look at like Amazon and cloud, they're not winner take all, these aren't necessarily winner take all markets. It's not necessarily a zero sum game, but let's call it winner take most. What odds would you give that open AI 10 years from now will be in that position. >> If I'm 0 to 10 kind of thing? >> Yeah, it's like horse race, 3 to 1, 2 to 1, even money, 10 to 1, 50 to 1. >> Maybe 2 to 1, >> 2 to 1, that's pretty low odds. That's basically saying they're the favorite, they're the front runner. Would you agree with that? >> I'd say 4 to 1. >> Yeah, I was going to say I'm like a 5 to 1, 7 to 1 type of person, 'cause I'm a skeptic with, you know, there's so much competition, but- >> I think they're definitely the leader. I mean you got to say, I mean. >> Oh there's no question. There's no question about it. >> The question is can they execute? >> They're not Friendster, is what you're saying. >> They're not Friendster and they're more like Twitter and Reddit where they have momentum. If they can execute on the product side, and if they don't stumble on that, they will continue to have the lead. >> If they say stay neutral, as Sam is, has been saying, that, hey, Microsoft is one of our partners, if you look at their company model, how they have structured the company, then they're going to pay back to the investors, like Microsoft is the biggest one, up to certain, like by certain number of years, they're going to pay back from all the money they make, and after that, they're going to give the money back to the public, to the, I don't know who they give it to, like non-profit or something. (indistinct) >> Okay, the odds are dropping. (group talks over each other) That's a good point though >> Actually they might have done that to fend off the criticism of this. But it's really interesting to see the model they have adopted. >> The wildcard in all this, My last word on this is that, if there's a developer shift in how developers and data can come together again, we have conferences around the future of data, Supercloud and meshs versus, you know, how the data world, coding with data, how that evolves will also dictate, 'cause a wild card could be a shift in the landscape around how developers are using either machine learning or AI like techniques to code into their apps, so. >> That's fantastic insight. I can't thank you enough for your time, on the heels of Supercloud 2, really appreciate it. All right, thanks to John and Sarbjeet for the outstanding conversation today. Special thanks to the Palo Alto studio team. My goodness, Anderson, this great backdrop. You guys got it all out here, I'm jealous. And Noah, really appreciate it, Chuck, Andrew Frick and Cameron, Andrew Frick switching, Cameron on the video lake, great job. And Alex Myerson, he's on production, manages the podcast for us, Ken Schiffman as well. Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight help get the word out on social media and our newsletters. Rob Hof is our editor-in-chief over at SiliconANGLE, does some great editing, thanks to all. Remember, all these episodes are available as podcasts. All you got to do is search Breaking Analysis podcast, wherever you listen. Publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com. Want to get in touch, email me directly, david.vellante@siliconangle.com or DM me at dvellante, or comment on our LinkedIn post. And by all means, check out etr.ai. They got really great survey data in the enterprise tech business. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, We'll see you next time on Breaking Analysis. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
bringing you data-driven and ChatGPT have taken the world by storm. So I asked it, give it to the large language models to do that. So to your point, it's So one of the problems with ChatGPT, and he simply gave the system the prompts, or the OS to help it do but it kind of levels the playing- and the answers were coming as the data you can get. Yeah, and leveled to certain extent. I check the facts, save me about maybe- and then I write a killer because like if the it's, the law is we, you know, I think that's true and I ask the set of similar question, What's your counter point? and not it's underestimated long term. That's what he said. for the first time, wow. the overhyped at the No, it was, it was I got, right I mean? the internet in the early days, and it's only going to get better." So you're saying it's bifurcated. and possibly the debate the first mobile device. So I mean. on the right with ChatGPT, and convicted by the Department of Justice the scrutiny from the Fed, right, so- And the privacy and thing to do what Sam Altman- So even though it'll get like, you know, it's- It's more than clever. I mean you write- I think that's a big thing. I think he was doing- I was not impressed because You know like. And he did the same thing he's got a lot of hyperbole. the browser moment to me, So OpenAI could stay on the right side You're right, it was terrible, They could be the Netscape Navigator, and in the horizontal axis's So I guess that's the other point is, I mean to quote IBM's So the data problem factors and the government's around the world, and they're slow to catch up. Yeah, and now they got years, you know, OpenAI. But the problem with government to kill Big Tech, and the 20% is probably relevant, back in the day, right? are they going to apply it? and also to write code as well, that the marketplace I don't, I don't see you had an interesting comment. No, no. First of all, the AI chops that Google has, right? are off the scales, right? I mean they got to be and the capacity to process that data, on some of the thinking So Lina Kahn is looming, and this is the third, could be a third rail. But the first thing What they will do out the separate company Is it to charge you for a query? it's cool to type stuff in natural language is the way and how many cents the and they're going through Google search results. It will, because there were It'll be like, you know, I mean. I never input the transcript. Wow, But it was a big lie. but I call it the vanilla content. Make your point, cause we And on the danger side as well, So the data By the way, that means at the Supercloud event, So one of the VCs actually What do you make of it? you were like "Hundreds of millions." not 10, not a billion. Clearly, the CapEx spending to build all But I think it's not that hard. It's, what, you know This is the new economics Look at the amount of And Sam is depositioning all the success, or 150 or 200 million to train the model. So I think to compute is different. not because of the software. Because you can, buy They built the moat And then, you know, well that the Hudson and it was over. that are going to be seeping out. Yeah, it's like horse race, 3 to 1, 2 to 1, that's pretty low odds. I mean you got to say, I mean. Oh there's no question. is what you're saying. and if they don't stumble on that, the money back to the public, to the, Okay, the odds are dropping. the model they have adopted. Supercloud and meshs versus, you know, on the heels of Supercloud
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sarbjeet | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brian Gracely | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lina Khan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lena Khan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sam Altman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rob Thomas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
David Flynn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Noah | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ray Amara | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
150 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rob Hof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chuck | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Howie Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Anderson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Santa Cruz | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1995 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Lina Kahn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zhamak Dehghani | PERSON | 0.99+ |
50 words | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hundreds of millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Compaq | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kristen Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two sentences | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
hundreds of millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Satya Nadella | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cameron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one sentence | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Clay Christensen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sarbjeet Johal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Netscape | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Alex Hanna, The DAIR Institute | WiDS 2022
(upbeat music) >> Hey everyone. Welcome to theCUBE's coverage of Women in Data Science, 2022. I'm Lisa Martin, excited to be coming to you live from Stanford University at the Ariaga alumni center. I'm pleased to welcome fresh keynote stage Alex Hanna the director of research at the dare Institute. Alex, it's great to have you on the program. >> Yeah, lovely to be here. >> Talk to me a little bit about yourself. I know your background is in sociology. We were talking before we went live about your hobbies and roller derby, which I love. >> Yes. >> But talk to me a little bit about your background and what the DAIR Institute this is, distributed AI research Institute, what it actually is doing. >> Sure, absolutely. So happy to be here talking to the women in data science community. So my background's in sociology, but also in computer science and machine learning. So my dissertation work was actually focusing on developing some machine learning and natural language processing tools for analyzing protest event data and generating that and applying it to pertinent questions within social movement scholarship. After that, I was a faculty at University of Toronto and then research scientist at Google on the ethical AI team where I met Dr. Timnit Gebru who is the founder of DAIR. And so, DAIR is a nonprofit research Institute oriented on around independent community based AI work, focused really on, the kind of, lots of discussions around AI are done by big companies or companies focus on solutions that are very much oriented around collecting as much data as they can. Not really knowing if it's going to be for community benefit. At DAIR, we want to flip that, we want to really want to prioritize what that would mean if communities had input into data driven technologies what it would mean for those communities and how we can help there. >> Double click and just some of your research, where do your passions lie? >> So I'm a sociologist and a lot of that being, I think one of the big insights of sociology is to really highlight at how society can be more just, how we can interrogate inequality and understanding how to make those distances between people who are underserved and over served who already have quite a lot, how we can reduce the disparities. So finding out where that lies, especially in technology that's really what I'm passionate about. So it's not just technology, which I think can be helpful but it's really understanding what it means to reduce those gaps and make the world more just. >> And that's so important. I mean, as more and more data is generated, exponentially growing, so are some of the biases and the challenges that that causes. You just gave your tech vision talk which I had a chance to see most of it. And you were talking about something that's very interesting. That is the biases in facial recognition software. Maybe on a little bit about what you talked about and why that is such a challenge. And also what are some of the steps being made in the right direction where that's concerned? >> Yeah. So there's the work I was talking about in the talk was highlighting, not work I've done, but the work by doctors (indistinct) and (indistinct) focusing on the distance that exists and the biases that exist in facial recognition as a technical system. The fact remains also that facial recognition is used and is disproportionately deployed on marginalized population. So in the U.S, that means black and brown communities. That's where facial recognition is used disproportionately. And we also see this in refugee context where refugees will be leaving the country. And those facial recognition software will be used in those contexts and surveilling them. So these are people already in a really precarious place. And so, some of the movements there have been to debias some of the facial recognition tools. I actually don't think that's far enough. I'm fundamentally against facial recognition. I think that it shouldn't be used as a technology because it is used so pervasively in surveillance and policing. And if we're going to approach that we really need to think, rethink our models of security models of immigration and whatnot. >> Right, it's such an important topic to discuss because I think it needs more awareness about some of the the biases, but also some to your point about some of those vulnerable communities that are really potentially being harmed by technologies like that. We have to be, there's a fine line. Or maybe it's not so fine. >> I don't think it's that fine. So like, I think it's used, in an incredibly harsh way. And for instance there's research that's being done in which, so I'm a transgender woman and there's a research being done by researchers who collected data sets that people had on YouTube documenting their transitions. And already there was a researcher collecting those data and saying, well, we could have terrorists or something take hormones and cross borders. And you talk to any trans person, you're like, well, that's not how it works, first off. Second off, it's already viewing trans people and a trans body as kind of a mode of deception. And so that's, whereas researchers in this space were collecting those data and saying that well, we should collect these data to help make these facial recognitions more fair. But that's not fair if it's going to be used on a population that's already intensely surveilled and held in suspicion. >> Right. That's, the question of fairness is huge, absolutely. Were you always interested in tech, you talked about your background in sociology. Was it something that you always, were you a stem kid from the time you were little? Talk to me about your background and how you got to where you are now? >> Yeah. I've been using computers since I was four. I've been using, I was taking a part, my parents' gateway computer. yeah, when I was 10. Going to computer shows, slapping hard drives into things, seeing how much we could upgrade computer on our own and ruining more than in one computer, to my parents chagrin but I've always been that. I went to undergrad in triple major to computer science, math and sociology, and originally just in computer science and then added the other two where I got interested in things and understanding that, was really interested in this section of tech and society. And I think the more and more I sat within the field and went and did my graduate work in sociology and other social sciences really found that there was a place to interrogate those, that intersection of the two. >> Exactly. What are some of the things that excite you now about where technology is going? What are some of the positives that you see? >> I talk so much about the negatives. It's really hard to, I mean, there's I think, some of the things that I think that are positive are really the community driven initiatives that are saying, well, what can we do to remake this in such a way that is going to more be more positive for our community? And so seeing projects like, that try to do community control over certain kinds of AI models or really try to tie together different kinds of fields. I mean, that's exciting. And I think right now we're seeing a lot of people that are super politically and justice literate and they how to work and they know what's behind all these data driven technologies and they can really try to flip the script and try to understand what would it mean to kind of turn this into something that empowers us instead of being something that is really becoming centralized in a few companies >> Right. We need to be empowered with that for sure. How did you get involved with WIS? >> So Margo, one of the co-directors, we sit on a board together, the human rights data analysis group and I've been a huge fan of HR dag for a really long time because HR dag is probably one of the first projects I've seen that's really focused on using data for accountability for justice. Their methodology has been, called on to hold perpetrators of genocide to accounts to hold state violence, perpetrators to account. And I always thought that was really admirable. And so being on their board is sort of, kind of a dream. Not that they're actually coming to me for advice. So I met Margo and she said, come on down and let's do a thing for WIS and I happily obliged >> Is this your first Wis? >> This is my very first Wis. >> Oh, excellent. >> Yeah. >> What's your interpretation so far? >> I'm having a great time. I'm learning a lot meeting a lot of great people and I think it's great to bring folks from all levels here. Not only, people who are a super senior which they're not going to get the most out of it it's going to be the high school students the undergrads, grad students, folks who, and you're never too old to be mentored, so, fighting your own mentors too. >> You know, it's so great to see the young faces here and the mature faces as well. But one of the things that I was, I caught in the panel this morning was the the talk about mentors versus sponsors. And that's actually, I didn't know the difference until a few years ago in another women in tech event. And I thought it was such great advice for those panelists to be talking to the audience, talking about the importance of mentors, but also the difference between a mentor and sponsor. Who are some of your mentors? >> Yeah, I mean, great question. It's going to sound cheesy, but my boss (indistinct) I mean, she's been a huge mentor for me and with her and another mentor (indistinct) Mitchell, I wouldn't have been a research scientist. I was the first social scientist on the research scientist ladder at Google before I left and if it wasn't for their, they did sponsor but then they all also mentored me greatly. My PhD advisor, (indistinct) huge mentor by, and I mean, lots of primarily and then peer mentors, people that are kind of at the same stage as me academically but also in professionally, but are mentors. So folks like Anna Lauren Hoffman, who's at the UDub, she's a great inspiration in collaborating, co-conspirator, so yeah. >> Co-conspirator, I like that. I'm sure you have quite a few mentees as well. Talk to me a little bit about that and what excites you about being a mentor. >> Yeah. I have a lot of mentees either informally or formally. And I sought that out purposefully. I think one of the speakers this morning on the panel was saying, if you can mentor do it. And that's what I did and sought out that, I mean, it excites me because folks, I don't have all the answers, no one person does. You only get to those places, if you have a large community. And I think being smart is often something that people think comes like, there's kind of like a smart gene or whatever but like there probably is, like I'm not a biologist or a cognitive, anything, but what really takes cultivation is being kind and really advocating for other people and building solidarity. And so that's what mentorship really means to me is building that solidarity and really trying to lift other people up. I mean, I'm only here and where I'm at in my career, because many people were mentors and sponsors to me and that's only right to pay that forward. >> I love that, paying that forward. That's so true. There's nothing like a good community, right? I mean, there's so much opportunity that that ground swell just generates, which is what I love. We are, tomorrow is international women's day. And if we look at the numbers, women are 50% of the workforce, but only less than a quarter in stem positions. What's your advice and recommendation for those young girls who might be intimidated or might be being told even to this day, no, you can't do physics. You can't do computer science. What can you tell them? >> Yeah, I mean, so individual solutions to that are putting a bandaid on a very big wound. And I mean I think, finding other people in a working to change it, I mean, I think building structures of solidarity and care are really the only way we'll get out of that. >> I agree. Well, Alex, it's been great to have you on the program. Thank you for coming and sharing what you're doing at DAIR. The intersection of sociology and technology was fascinating and your roller derby, we'll have to talk well about that. >> For sure. >> Excellent. >> Thanks for joining me. >> Yeah, thank you Lisa. >> For Alex Hanna, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE's coverage live, of women in data science worldwide conference, 2022. Stick around, my next guest is coming right up. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
to be coming to you live Talk to me a little bit about yourself. But talk to me a little and applying it to pertinent questions and a lot of that being, and the challenges that that causes. and the biases that exist but also some to your point it's going to be used Talk to me about your background And I think the more and What are some of the and they how to work and they know what's We need to be empowered and I've been a huge fan of and I think it's great to bring I caught in the panel this morning people that are kind of at the and what excites you about being a mentor. and that's only right to pay that forward. even to this day, no, and care are really the only to have you on the program. of women in data science
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alex Hanna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Anna Lauren Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Timnit Gebru | PERSON | 0.99+ |
DAIR | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Margo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Mitchell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DAIR Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
University of Toronto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
U.S | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.98+ |
Stanford University | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.98+ |
dare Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
less than a quarter | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
AI research Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
UDub | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
WIS | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Women in Data Science | TITLE | 0.94+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Dr. | PERSON | 0.92+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.91+ |
Double click | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.91+ |
HR dag | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
first social | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
first projects | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
international women's day | EVENT | 0.8+ |
one computer | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
triple | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
Wis | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
more | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
WiDS | EVENT | 0.55+ |
Ariaga | ORGANIZATION | 0.52+ |
Cloud City Live Preview with Danielle Royston | Mobile World Congress 2021
(soft music) >> Hi everyone. And welcome to this special cube conversation and kickoff preview of the Mobile World Congress Barcelona event. It's a physical event that's going to be taking place in person. It will probably be the first hybrid big event 68 days until the June 28th kickoff. You might've heard TelcoDr, Telco disruptor. Is on a mission to move the telco industry to the public cloud. And, and, and it's been taken of one of the biggest spaces this year from Erickson is the big story everyone's talking about. And of course the CUBE is excited to be there and broadcast and be a partner with TelcoDr. So I'm excited to bring on the founder and CEO of TelcoDr. Danielle Royston. Danielle great to see you. Thanks for coming on for this Mobile World Congress preview. >> Thank you so much for having me. I'm psyched to talk to you about this, its going to be great. >> So Erickson always has the biggest booth 14 years. You're disrupting the Barcelona not people's shorts going to be on or off. It's officially on, it's happening. And there's going to be a physical event we're coming out of COVID still a risky move. It's going to be a big hybrid event. It's going to be in person. Tell us the story. How did you guys come out of nowhere a disruptor take the biggest real estate in the place and turn it into a community event. A news event, immediate event, everything tell us. >> Yeah, well, you know, I think it was March 9th a little over a month ago. Ericsson announced that they were pulling out of MWC and it's very analogous to what happened in 2020. They were one of the first vendors to bail as well. And it kind of started this like tidal wave of people saying, can't do it. And I think the distinction now is that, that was at the beginning of COVID. There was a lot of unknowns, you know, is it coming? Is it not? Is it safe? Is it not? We're now, you know, year 50 to three, four months into it. I think that when you look at where we are now cases are trending down. The vaccine is up. And I think the legacy players were sort of backward looking they're like, this is a repeat of 2020. We're going to, it's not safe to go. We're going to pull out. And I'm like with a hundred days to go. And the vaccine ramping, I think I see it a different way. I think there's a really big opportunity. John Hoffman, CEO of the GSMA had put out a two page missive on LinkedIn where he was personally responding to questions about how serious they were about making sure that the event was safe and could be held. And my, my view was this is going to happen. And with Ericsson pulling out, I mean this is hollowed ground. I mean, this is, you know, a, you know, massively successful company that has customers literally trained like Skinner's chickens to come to the same spot every year. And now I get to, you know, put out my shingle right there and say welcome and show them the future , right? And instead of the legacy past and all the normal rhetoric that you hear from those you know, sort of dinosaurs, Ericsson and Nokia now they're going to hear about the public cloud. And I'm really excited for this opportunity. I think the ROI on this event is instant. And so it was, it was a pretty easy decision. I think I thought about it for about 30 seconds. >> It's a real bold move. And it's, again, it's a risk that pays off if it happens, if it doesn't, you know, you didn't happen but you're like, it's like a, it's like the the startups that put a Superbowl commercial for the first time, it's a big hit and it's a big gamble that pays off huge. Take us through, I heard, how did it all happen? Did you just wake up and saw it was open? How do you know that it was open? Was it like, does the email go out, say hey I've got this huge space for >> Well, I mean, it was big news. It was big news in the industry that they were pulling out and all the journalists were like, Oh, here we go again. You know, everyone's going to bail, who who's next right? And, and everyone was sort of like building that sort of negative momentum energy. And I'm like, we got to squash this. So I put out a tweet on Twitter. I mean, I'm not the most followed person but I'm kind of known in telco. And I was like, hey GSMA, I'll take over the booth. And I don't think people even liked my tweet, right? Like no likes no retweets. I reached out to a couple of journalists. I'm like, let's do an interview. Let's do a story. Everyone's like, we'll have you on the podcast like in a month, I'm like what?! So, so when John Hoffman had put out that letter I had connected to him. And so I was like, Oh, I'm connected to the CEO of the GSMA. So I went out on LinkedIn and I referenced the story and I said, John Hoffman, I'll take over the booth. And I think about 30 minutes later he responded and said, let's do it. And I said, great, who do I talk to? And I was in touch with someone within a couple of hours. And I think we put the whole deal together in 48. And I think wrote the press release and announced it on Friday. So happened on Tuesday the ninth, announced by that Friday. And I really, I was like, GSMA, we've got to get this out. And we got to stop the negative momentum of the show and get people to realize it's going to be different in June. This is going to happen. Let's go do it. And so I think they are they're psyched that I stepped into the booth it's big booth it's 65,000 square feet, 6,000 square meters for for the rest of the World that use it, the metric system. And I mean, that's huge. I mean, that's the size of a professional pitch in a in a football field, a soccer field. That's a one and a half football fields. It's, it's a ton of space. It's a ton of space pull off. >> I think what's interesting is there's a points out that this new business model of being connected you were on LinkedIn, you connect to them you get a deal done so fast. This is how this is the direct to consumer as a start-up you're literally took over the primo space the best space in the area. So congratulations. And, and the other thing that's notable and why I'm excited to talk to you is that this kind of sets the table for the first global what I call hybrid event. This will probably be a cornerstone case study in and of itself because we're still kind of coming out of the pandemic. People are getting vaccinated. People want to fly. They want to get out of the house, were partnering with the CUBE and the CUBE 365 platform. And, you know, we'd love hybrid. We'd love doing events, theCUBE that's what we do with video. Now, we're going to do a partnership with you to create this hybrid experience. What can people and guests who come to Barcelona or watch remotely expect? >> Yeah, so I think there's a couple of experiences that we're trying to drive in the booth. I think obviously demonstrations, you know I can't fill 65,000 square feet on my own. I'm a startup small company. And so I am inviting like-minded forward thinking companies to join me in the booth. I'm, I'm paying for it providing a turnkey experience for those vendors. And so I think what we have in common is we're thinking about future technologies, like open ran on the network side and obviously public cloud which is a big part of my message. And so first and foremost, foremost, there's, you know come and see the companies that are driving the change the new technologies that are out there and what's available for, for carriers to start to adopt and think about. MWC is a meeting intensive event. Deals are done at this show. In 2019, I think the stat is $65 billion of deals were put together at the show. And so a big component of the booth will be a place for executives to come together and have private conversations. And so we're going to have that. So that's going to be a big piece of it. And I think the third part is driving education and thought leadership. And so there's going to be a whole, you know, talk track right? Tech topics, business topics customer case studies involve the hyperscalers and really start to educate the telco community around these new technologies. But there'll be shorter talks. They won't be like hour long keynotes. We're talking 15, 20 minutes. And I think one thing that we're going to do with you as you were just talking about with theCUBE is, you know MWC was the first big show to have to cancel with COVID I think in 2019, sorry, 2020, the the dates it's always the last Monday in February and and the rest of that week. And so that's like right at the beginning of that of the COVID stuff, Italy was just starting to take off. So it was one of the first shows that had to make a big call and decide to cancel, which they did. This is going to be one of the first shows that comes back online, post COVID right? And so I don't think things just snap back to the way that they used to be. I don't think we, as consumers are going to snap back to the way that we operating we're now used to being able to get curbside delivery from any restaurant in the city, right. I mean, it's just, it's just a sort of a different expectation. And so partnering with theCUBE, we really want to provide an experience that brings the virtual people into the booth. Typically in events like this you really have to be there to see it boosts are kind of like unveiled the day of the show. What's going on. One thing I'm trying to do is really educate people about what you can expect. What can you see? This is what it's going to look like. And so we're going to start to share some pictures of the booth of, of, you know, what it looks like. Number one, to drive excitement with the partners that are coming, right. Like you're going to be part of something really, really fabulous. I think number two attendees can wait, I don't know week of to make the decision to go. And so maybe if COVID continues to trend down and vaccines are, are picking up steam, maybe they're like it's safe for me to go and I want to go be a part of that. But I think from here on out we're going to have sort of that virtual experience. It's always going to be part of shows. And so we're going to experiment with you guys. We're going to have a live streaming event over the course of the, you know, all MWC. It's going to be a way for people who are unable to travel or, you know, can't afford it. COVID or whatever, see what's going on in the booth. And it's going to be everything from listen to a talk to watch what you guys are typically famous for, your awesome interviews. We're going to have a man on the street, you know, like you know, we're here at, at a demo station, take us through your little demo. We're going to have telepresence robots that people can reserve. And, you know, cruise to the booth, the robot can go to a talk. The robot can watch on this streaming thing the robot can go to a demo. The robot can go to a meeting and it's controlled by the the virtual attendees and so experimenting, right? Like how do we make this great for virtual people? How do we make the virtual people feel part of the physical? How do the physical people feel? The virtual people that are attending and really just make it feel like a community of both. So really excited >> That's super awesome. And I think one of the, first of all, thank you for having paying for everyone and including theCUBE in that but I think this speaks to the ecosystem of open you're bringing, you're creating an open ecosystem. And I think that is a huge thing. So for people who are at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona this is going to be a nice, safe place to hang space as well as get deals done and to be comfortable doing media center, we'll get you on the digital TV, but also you're also designing the first what I call the first hybrid experience not just having people, having on-demand videos on their website, connecting Barcelona with other parts of the World, with meetings and stories and content. I think that to me is going to be a great experiment slash upgrade. We'll see, we'll get to see it. >> Well, it was really, I mean, we all lived through 2020. I mean, some of the shows went on AWS's re-invent happened. Google did like a crazy nine week program. It's very lonely to participate in those virtual events right. You know, you kind of log on by herself. No, one's really tweeting about it. You're watching, you know, an event the event is great, but it was really lonely. And so, you know, and I think what people love about the physical events is we're together and we're networking and we're meeting people. And so, you know, I think continue to evolve that experience so that virtual is not as lonely. So we'll see, we'll see how it goes. >> No, I've got to say your, your vision is really aligned with us and others that are in this open innovation World. Because if you look at like theCUBE physical went away, we had no events. We did Q virtual, a new brand. It wasn't a pivot. It was an extension, a line extension of theCUBE. Now theCUBES coming back to the physical. We're going to bring that cube virtual to connect everybody. So this is it. And it just amplifies the value of the physical event. So if done right, is so much cooler. So, so that's cool. And what I want to ask you though on the physical side to kind of bring it back to physical is there's still going to be keynotes. There's still going to be talks at Mobile World Congress. And so I saw that schedule and I just saw last week GSMA announced you're going to be doing a keynote speech. That's amazing. So how did that happen? So give us the lowdown on the keynote that you're doing. >> I'm sure the entire industry is like that happened. And it probably has something to do with the back that I have one of the biggest booths at the space. I always, you know, put in a request to speak. I feel that I have really exciting message to share with the industry. Over the last I guess it's been 9 or 10 months. I really been trying to amplify, amplify my voice. I have a podcast, I have a newsletter I'm talking to execs. I have a list that I literally go down one by one stalking each executive of like have I talked to them like how I told them about like the power of the public cloud. And so I am super thankful that I have this opportunity to spread that this message and I'm, I'm planning a really epic talk, just I really want to shake the industry. And this is, this is my opportunity, right? This is my opportunity to stand on the biggest stage in our industry. And command a presence and send out my message. And I'm absolutely thrilled to go do it. And I hope I crush it. I hope it's like a mic drop experience and can't wait to do it. >> Well, we're looking forward to covering it. And we love the open vision. We love the idea of public cloud and the enablement and the disruption, because just like you got the deal so fast, you can move fast with modern applications with the cloud moving at cloud scale, complete content, game changer, so great stuff. So totally applaud that looking forward to, and we're we're here to cheer you on and, and and ask the tough questions. I do want to get to on Twitter yesterday though, you put out on tweetstorm on Twitter, about the plans kind of teasing out the booth. How you going to plan to build the booth, are you worried that you're opening up too much of the kimono here and opened up putting too much on the table because it's usually a secret Mobile World Congress is supposed to be secret, not publicly out there. What, what's the, you know >> Well, I mean, I think this is just a little bit of a change has happened post COVID, right. You know, people usually build their booth in and don't reveal it until the first day of the show. And it's kind of like this excitement to go see what is there, what's their big message. And what's the big reveal. And there's always fun stuff. I think this year is a little bit different. So at first, like I said, at first big event back. I think I need to create a little bit of excitement for people who are going and maybe entice people that maybe you should think about coming. I realize this is a super personal decision, right? It depends on where you are and the country and your, your health and your status. But, but if you can do it I want people to know that you're going to miss out. It's going to be super fun. So, um, so yeah. >> Well, let's take it. Let's take a look at the booth though. And that's why my next question, I want to see I know we have guys, do we have that, rendering, let's pull that up and let's talk this through. Let's go look at the rendering. So you can see here on the screen, take us through this. >> Yeah. So what we want to do is give the sense of, of cloud city, right? And that's what we're calling this space in cloud cities. There's in a city there's outdoor space. Like you see here, and then there's in indoor space. And indoors is for you where you work, where you buy, where you meet. And so you can see here on the left, the demo stations that would have different vendors displaying you know, and it kind of, it goes way back. I mean, what we're feeling like I said is like a football field, an American football field and the half or a European football field a pitch it's pretty, it's pretty extensive. And so we think we're going to have, I don't know, 20 30 vendors showing their, their different software. I think we're, we're scheduling or planning for about 24 different meeting rooms that we can schedule all COVID safe with the, with the space requirements in there, but on the out in that outdoor space, it would be where you learn right. The education and then I think we're going to have this fabulous booth for the, for theCUBE. It's going to look, It's just so amazing with the backdrop of this amazing building. And, you know, I think I underappreciated or didn't really realize, you know, how devastated the both the event planning industry has been from COVID as well as construction. You know, obviously when events were shut down these companies had to lay off thousands of workers. Some of the big firms have laid off 50% of their workforce. And those people, you know they didn't just go home and sit around. They, they had to come up with a livelihood and this people have pivoted into another job. And they're not really, I mean events aren't really back yet. So some of these firms are shrunk. You know, the manpower is, is severely reduced. But then I think on the other side is and you can see this in just housing construction. There's a lumber shortage, there's a shortage of materials. And so everything that we source for the booth pretty much has to come from Spain. And so when we look at the booth, you know, we have, we have a pretty significant ceiling. Well, it looks like the roof of the building. It's an engineering feat to do. That we're still working through the sure. Someone with a protractor is doing lots of math. You know, the glass, we have those huge beautiful glass spans in the front getting a glass that spans that height. I think it's, I think it's 18 feet. It's six meters tall. That's going to be hard things like the flooring. I want to have like hardwood, laminate flooring. So it looks like hardwood floors. Don't know if we can find them right there. Like, why don't you do carpet? I'm like, can you just check one more vendor? I really want my floor. So, so we'll see how it goes. And yeah, I, I think that sharing this plan, the trials and tribulations, like how can this small startup, right? That usually, you know, take over a space that usually takes nine months to plan, right? Who is this girl? What is she doing? How are they going to pull this off? You know, I think it's like, grab your popcorn and watch the train wreck or, you know, hero's journey. We get it done. >> Well, people are on clubhouse. They're bored, they want to get out. I think this is a case study. Mobile World Congress has a huge economic impact for the, as a show it's got its own little economy built around it. Impacts the, the country of Spain in Barcelona, the city, a great city. People love it. And so it certainly is notable and newsworthy. We will be following that story. I have to ask you more of a, kind of a tactical question. If you don't mind, while I have you here, can you talk about some of the vendors that are coming and the kinds of talks you're going to have inside the booth and and how do people get involved? You mentioned it's open to people who love open ran and open public cloud, open technologies. I mean, that's pretty much everybody that's cool and relevant, which is like almost the whole World now. So like, is it going to be a space, is there a criteria? How do people get involved? What's the collaboration formula. >> Yeah, no. I had been working on putting together a list of potential vendors. You'd be surprised, not everyone is, is as bullish as I am on the public cloud. And so there was a little bit of a filtering criteria, but otherwise anyone can come right enterprise software vendors in telco where their primary customer is a communications service provider. That's their software runs on the public cloud come on in, right. People using open man. And it's still a little sort of small band of cohorts that are really trying to drive this new technology forward. And, and they're growing up, going up against some of the biggest companies in telco, right? They're going up against Huawei. They're going up against Ericcson. Both those guys are, are very anti and then not really pro open rank because it's hugely disruptive to their business. And so, you know I'm pretty sure those guys are not psyched to see open ran you know, you know, become a thing in telco. And so it's really sort of about disruptive technologies that are that are in the, in the booth. And so, yeah, I'm paying for the space. I'm paying for the, build-out bring your demos bring your people, come with your marketing message and and let's, and let's build a community. And so we're talking to open ran vendors like Mavenir. Which is a pretty big name in the open ran, open ran space. I've been talking with parallel wireless and LTO star. Those are also great players, software vendors like Totogi, which is a talk that I did a little over a month ago about this new startup that has a web-scale charger that they're trying to put out there. Aria is another company that I'm really familiar with that has some cloud for software and then little tiny startups like Zquence, and some other up-and-comers that no one's heard of. So we're really excited to invite them into the booth. I've been secretly stalking Elon, Elon Musk and Starlink and SpaceX to be a part of it. And we'll see, right. I'm kind of, you know, using Twitter and whatever I can to, to reach out and see if they want to be a part of it. But yeah, it's kind of really open arms, not really excluded. >> Oh, Elon, Elon is very disruptive and you know, he reached out on, you can reach out to him on Twitter. He's accessible. I mean, you've got to break through, but he is got this antenna up for innovators. People who think differently. They love people who break down walls and markets floor open wins. I mean, we, we know there's a history we've been covering it. I've been involved in my career. People who bet against open, always lose it's happened in every single wave of innovation. So Elons gettable, lets get him. >> Who doesn't love Elon Musk. I mean, I think some people don't, I love him, he's my hero. I model a lot of the things that I do around, around his, his approach, his vision, right, 20 years ago or close to 20 years ago, 2003 he said he was going to put people on Mars. And I think people laughed at him for being like the PayPal guy and this guy's crazy. But every year he makes progress against his goals, right. We have a real landable rocket. He's doing a manned mission this week, a second man mission or third man mission. And the guy makes progress. And I think I'm on the same, same mission here. My mission is to move telco to the public cloud. I think it's a, it's a long journey, right? I think people are like, who's this girl and she's like 12 people, and what's your story? And I'm like, I don't care. I have a singular mission is a quest. I am not going to stop until I moved the industry to the public cloud. And I it's my life's mission. And I'm psyched to do it. >> Well, we love the mojo. We'd love your style. We'd love Elon Musk, his mugshot. And again, just to bring the dots together you have that same mindset, which has, you know, as people you know, love her, love or like Elon, he's a builder. Okay, he builds things and he delivers. So as you said, so know I really appreciate the work you're doing. I love your philosophy. We're in total agreement, open, open building. Doing it together as a collective, being part of something. This is what the World needs. You got a lot of great ideas in the works and we can't wait to hear them. And what you got coming up over the next 68 days. This is the first of many conversations together. Thank you so much >> Yeah, yeah, no, it's going to be so awesome. Thank you so much for having me. Psyched to talk to you about it. >> Okay Mobile World Congress is happening in Barcelona on the June 28th. It's going to be in person and it's going to be probably the biggest hybrid event to date. Be there, check out telcoDR and theCUBE and the space that they took over 14 years at the helm there. Ericcson had it, now it's TelcoDR. Danielle Royston, founder and CEO here with me from TelcoDR. Thanks for watching. (soft music)
SUMMARY :
And of course the CUBE I'm psyched to talk to you about And there's going to be a physical event I mean, this is, you know, Was it like, does the And I think we put the And, and the other thing that's notable of the booth of, of, you I think that to me is going to be a And so, you know, I think on the physical side to And it probably has something to do and the enablement and the disruption, I think I need to create So you can see here on the And so you can see here on I have to ask you more of a, And so, you know disruptive and you know, And I'm psyched to do it. And again, just to bring the dots together Psyched to talk to you about it. It's going to be in
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Danielle Royston | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Elon Musk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Huawei | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six meters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GSMA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Elon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
nine months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
65,000 square feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zquence | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
18 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mars | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
March 9th | DATE | 0.99+ |
$65 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2003 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Totogi | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
6,000 square meters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Aria | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
June 28th | DATE | 0.99+ |
SpaceX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
68 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mavenir | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
14 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Elons | PERSON | 0.99+ |
this week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
TelcoDr | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Superbowl | EVENT | 0.99+ |
9 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
MWC | EVENT | 0.99+ |
four months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
TelcoDR | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
PayPal | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
10 months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Danielle | PERSON | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
20 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first day | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Brian Hoffmann, IBM | IBM Think 2021
>>From around the globe. It's the queue with digital coverage of IBM. Think 20, 21 brought to you by IBM, welcome back to IBM. Think 2021. And we're going to dig into the intersection of finance and business strategy. My name is Dave Vellante and you're watching the cubes continuous coverage of IBM. Thinking with me is Brian Hoffman is the chief operating officer of IBM global financing. Brian, thanks for coming to the cube today. Good morning. Great to be here. Hey, good morning. So I think we've heard a lot about the impact of hybrid cloud AI, digital transformation, and I wonder as a finance person and a former CFO, what do you see and how do you think about some of the key considerations in financials and strategies that are supporting these major projects? Right. We've got to come to the CFO and say, Hey, we want to spend some money and here's the benefit. Here's the cost? How can CEOs and their teams work with CFOs to try to really accelerate that digital transformation? >>Right, right. Great question. And actually that question, I think I might've answered it a little bit differently. Like two years ago, a year ago before the pandemic, I think it's actually changed a little bit with the pandemic. Um, in, in my experience as a CFO, people would come into me for projects and there was three ways that you could justify it, right? You can justify short-term immediate quick payback kind of hitters. You can justify it with, um, you know, improving our efficiency or effectiveness, um, you know, reducing costs in the long run or making the client experience better or more from a strategic point of view. Um, you know, uh, growing revenue, getting to new clients, uh, improving margins, right? And so the, the hybrid cloud transformation journey really still addresses those three things. And when we come in, a lot of people focus, like you said, on that third strategic point. >>Uh, but, but all three of those come into play. And what's really interesting now is as I'm dealing with it, I'm talking to other CFOs. Uh, the pandemic is really, if you will throw in a wrinkle in here, right? So the, the, the clients that I'm talking to the IBM clients, they have to operate their business very differently. And, and their business models, some of them are changing. Clearly their clients, their business models are changing. They're operating differently as well. Um, so, so our clients have to react to that and hybrid cloud, and that, that, that type of a, of a structure really can support that. So there's really an emphasis here now to act with much more speed on this journey to get moving on it, to get there, because you have to make these changes and doing those two things in concert really has a ton of business value. >>Yeah. I mean, the CFOs that I've talked to and the CIO is it's really kind of industry dependent, right. If you're an airlines or hospitality, it was like, yeah, we got to cut costs. A lot of organizations said, okay, we're going to support remote workers, put in VDI or deal with end point security or whatever it was, but we're actually going double down on our digital transformation. This is where we're going to lean in. There's an opportunity for us to come out stronger. How did you guys approach it in terms of your own internal digital transformation? >>Yeah, we, we, um, we were working on our digital transformation, uh, you know, a little bit before the pandemic and it kind of followed those, those three, uh, those three items when they, when they first started implementing it, they came in and said, Hey, if we can, if we can move to a cloud, uh, platform, our infrastructure savings will be pretty significant. You know, the it infrastructure savings will be 30 to 40%. So, you know, quick payback, CFO types love that. So, you know, we went forward with that. Um, but then quickly we saw the, the real benefits of moving to a, a hybrid cloud strategy. So just as an example, as we were making some of these changes, we found a workflow tool in one of our markets in Europe. That was a great tool. And, uh, if we wanted to implement that across the business, um, in the old days, you know, we're in 40 countries, we've got 2,500 employees, three lines of business. >>It would have been very complex cause our, our operating structure is, is very robust, very complex. Um, it probably would've taken us a year, two years to do that, but since we are now on a cloud platform, we got that rolled out that workflow tool rolled out across our business in months saving, you know, 20 to 30% of, of workload being much more efficient in getting to our clients and reacting quilted with them. And in fact, that tool got adopted across IBM because that cloud platform enabled that to happen. And then the great thing, which I didn't even realize at the time, but now thinking more strategically, um, our, my it resource earlier was running at about 50, 50, 50 people were working on maintenance. He kind of thinks we 50 on development as we've now transitioned to this cloud, my it resources now 70 plus percent dedicated to new development. So now we can go attack new things that really provide customer value in the pandemic. You know, the first thing you look at is can we get into more, um, you know, electronic contracts, e-signatures things that, that would provide value to customers anyway, but in the pandemic is like really, uh, a significant, uh, no differentiator for us. So, so all those things were enabled by that, that, uh, journey that we've been taking. >>I know most of the CFO, in fact, every CFO I know of a public company took advantage of, you know, cheap debt and improving their balance sheets. And, you know, liquidity is not the problem today, especially in the tech industry. Uh, and at the same time, you know, I'm interested in how companies are using financing. They don't want to necessarily build out data centers, but they do want to fund their digital transformation. So what are you seeing in terms of how your customers are using financing? You know, what's the conversation, like, what advice are you giving? >>Yeah. So, um, you know, it, it depends a little bit on the type of customer, like you said, you know, we, we deal with a lot of the biggest strongest customers in the world. And, and as, as we deal with them, financing really helps the return on their investment, right. Aligning the payments of those cash flows for when they're getting the benefits. Uh, and, and we see a real good value in improving the return on those investments and helping, you know, if it's something that's going to go to the board, that really makes a difference to them. Uh, so you know, that that's always been a value proposition. It continues to be, um, the other thing that's helped them now, like you said, is, is even in this environment, people want to accelerate this transition. Um, but it's a, it's a, it's a big time of uncertainty. >>So, you know, some of the smaller clients, some of the more, uh, um, you know, the industries that are a little more cash, constrained airlines, et cetera, you know, they're looking for the, the immediate cashflow benefits. Um, but many of the C F O is, you're saying, Hey, listen, you know, I can, I want to go as fast as I can help me put together a structure that lets me, you know, get this in place as quick as possible. Uh, but not blow my budgets, not make me take too much risk in this time of uncertainty, uh, but keeps me moving. And I think that's where financing really comes in as well. Um, and we're, we're kind of talking much more about that value proposition than just if you will, the improved ROI proposition that we've had all along. >>I want, we can talk a little bit more about IBM global financing. I mean, people may have a lot of times people misunderstand it. You know, when you look at IBM's debt, you gotta, you gotta take out the, the piece that I've hit in global financing, because that's a significant portion and that's sort of self, you know, self fulfilling. Uh, but what do people need to know about, uh, IBM global financing? >>We actually run three different businesses, uh, and we've been transforming our strategy over time. So, you know, right now with, with, uh, IBM being all in on hybrid, we are very focused on helping IBM and IBM's clients on this digital journey on IBM growing their revenue. Um, you know, we, we, in the past had been more of, if you will, the full service, it finance are doing a lot more than just IBM, but we are really focused now on, on helping IBM. So I think the best thing for, for IBM clients to know is as you're talking to IBM about the total solution, that total value prop, that IBM brings that financing, that cashflow solution should be embedded in what they're looking at and can provide a lot of value. Um, you know, the second thing I think most people know is we provide, uh, financing for IBM's channels. >>So, you know, distributors, resellers, et cetera, if you're an IBM distributor or reseller, you know, about us, because just about a hundred percent of IBM's partners use us to provide that working capital financing. Uh, you know, we ha we have state-of-the-art platforms. We're, we're, uh, we're just so integrated with them. Again, I don't have to, I don't have to be a sales pitch on that because they all know us. Um, and the third one, just because people might not realize this is we do have an, we call it an asset recovery business. Um, it's a pretty small business, you know, springing back equipment that comes off lease or that, uh, is used by IBM internally. Um, and while, you know, it's not, it's not, uh, as well known, I'm pretty proud of it because it really does help with the focus that the world that IBM has on sustainability and reuse and, um, and making sure that, that, you know, we're, we're treating the planet fairly here, so that that's a, a small but powerful piece of our business. >>Well, you're quite broader than leasing mainframes in the eighties. That's for sure. So talk a bit more about, let me give you a double click on that sort of hybrid cloud and obviously machine intelligence is a big piece of those digital transformation. So, so how specifically are you, are you helping clients really take advantage of things like hybrid cloud? >>So, yeah, so, um, what we have typically have been doing, and I can, you know, give you a couple different examples if you will, you know, for, for larger clients, what we tend to be doing is helping them, like I said, accelerate their business. So, um, you know, they're looking to modernize their applications, uh, but they still have a big infrastructure in place. And so they'll run into, uh, you know, budget constraints and, and, you know, cash is still be careful advantage. So for them, we are much more typically focused on, on, you know, if you will, project based financing that allows those cash flows, uh, to line up with the savings. Again, those are tend to be bigger projects that often go to boards that return, uh, benefit is very important, uh, a little bit different value proposition for more, uh, mid-market customers. So, you know, uh, as I was kinda just looking recently, we have a couple of different customers like form engineering, um, or, or Novi still there, there are two smaller, uh, compared to some of the other customers we use, uh, they are again, much more focused on, on how do I, how do I conserve and best use my cash immediately. >>Uh, but they want to get this, they want to get this transformation going. So, uh, you know, we provide flexible payment plans to them, so they can go at the rate and pace that they need to, they can align up those cash flows with their budgets, for their business cycles, et cetera. So again, we're, we're smaller customers where timing of the cash flow in their business cycle is very important. We provide that benefit as well. >>You know, I wonder if I could ask you, so you remember, of course, the early days of, of public cloud, one of the first tailwinds for public cloud was the pen was not the pandemic, the, uh, the, the, the, the financial crisis of 2007. And a lot of CFOs said, okay, let's shift to, uh, to an OPEX model. Uh, and now you could always provide financial solutions to customers, but it seems like today, you know, when I talk to clients, it's, it's much more integrated. It's not just the public cloud, you can do that for on premises. And again, you always could do that, but it seems like there's much more simpatico, uh, in the way in which you provide that, that, that solution. >>Yeah. Yeah, absolutely. And this might be a little too finance geeky, I don't know, but if you go back, well, if you go back to the financial crisis and all that, and at that time, um, a lot of people were looking to financing for you called it, but, you know, if a CFO is talking about off balance sheet transaction, right. Um, and, and, you know, between regulation, et cetera, et cetera, that, that balance sheet thing, first of all, are seeing through it that much more clearly. But second, you know, the, the, uh, financial disclosure say, you kind of have to show that stuff. So that, that if you will, window dressing benefit has gone away. So now, which is great for me, we really get to talk about what's the real benefit. What is the, you know, what is the real benefit of, you know, you, you want to make sure that you have known timed, uh, expenditures, you know, that if your business grows, that, that your, your expenses can grow evenly with those, with that business growth, you don't have to take big chunky things. And so, you know, uh, financing under the covers of an integrated solution, and IBM has a lot of those integrated solutions allows businesses to have that, you know, known timing, known quantities, most of the benefits that people were looking for from that op ex cloud model, um, without, you know, some of the, the, uh, the problems that you have when you try to have to go straight to a public cloud for very, you know, big sensitive businesses, confidential, confidential, uh, data, et cetera. >>Right. Thanks for that. So, okay. We're, we're basically out of time, but I wonder if you could give us the bumper sticker or key takeaways, maybe you could summarize for our audience. >>Yeah. If for those that know, uh, IBM global financing or dealing with IBM, my view would be, uh, in the past, we, might've been a little more, you know, uh, out there with our own, with our own banner, et cetera, in the future. I think that, that you should expect to see us very well integrated into anything you're doing. I think our value prop is clear and compelling and, and, and will be included in these hybrid cloud transformations to the, to the benefit of our clients. So, uh, that's, that's our objective and, and we're well on our way there, >>Great. Diane work anywhere. I'm going to go for more, more familiar, obviously. ibm.com. You've got some resources there, but there was there any.com >>There's, there's a, I think you just probably a slash financing, but yeah, there's, it's loaded with information. Yeah. >>Excellent. Brian, thanks so much for coming to the cube. Really great to have you today and appreciate the time. Yeah, my pleasure. And thank you for watching everybody. This is Dave Volante for the cube and our coverage of IBM think 20, 21, the virtual edition, right back.
SUMMARY :
Think 20, 21 brought to you by IBM, welcome back to IBM. Um, you know, uh, growing revenue, moving on it, to get there, because you have to make these changes and doing those two things in concert really has How did you guys approach it in terms of your own internal digital transformation? So, you know, we went forward with that. um, you know, electronic contracts, e-signatures things that, that would provide value to customers and at the same time, you know, I'm interested in how companies are using financing. Uh, so you know, So, you know, some of the smaller clients, some of the more, uh, um, in global financing, because that's a significant portion and that's sort of self, you know, self fulfilling. So, you know, right now with, with, uh, IBM being all in on hybrid, Um, and while, you know, it's not, it's not, So talk a bit more about, let me give you a double click on that sort of hybrid cloud and obviously machine And so they'll run into, uh, you know, budget constraints and, and, you know, we provide flexible payment plans to them, so they can go at the rate and pace that customers, but it seems like today, you know, when I talk to clients, and IBM has a lot of those integrated solutions allows businesses to have that, you know, We're, we're basically out of time, but I wonder if you could give us the bumper sticker or key you know, uh, out there with our own, with our own banner, et cetera, in the future. I'm going to go for more, more familiar, obviously. There's, there's a, I think you just probably a slash financing, but yeah, there's, it's loaded with information. Really great to have you today and appreciate the time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brian Hoffmann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Brian Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Volante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2,500 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40 countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
70 plus percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Diane | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
three ways | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three lines | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
three items | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
eighties | DATE | 0.94+ |
three things | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
think 20 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.94+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
50 people | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
about 50 | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
third strategic point | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
about a hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.8+ |
. ibm.com | OTHER | 0.8+ |
financial crisis of 2007 | EVENT | 0.76+ |
Think 20 | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
any.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
21 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.67+ |
double click | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
Think 2021 | ORGANIZATION | 0.5+ |
21 | TITLE | 0.41+ |
MWC1 Danielle Royston
(upbeat music) >> Hi everyone, welcome to this special CUBE conversation and kickoff preview of the Mobile World Congress, Barcelona event. It's a physical event that's going to be taking place in person. It will probably be the first hybrid big event, 68 days until the June 28th kickoff. You might've heard TelcoDR, Telco Disruptor is on a mission to move the Telco industry to the public cloud. And it's taken one of the biggest spaces this year from Ericsson, is the big story everyone's talking about. And of course theCUBE is excited to be there and broadcast and be a partner with TelcoDR. So I'm excited to bring on the founder and CEO of TelcoDR, Danielle Royston. Danielle great to see you. Thanks for coming on for this Mobile World Congress Preview. >> Thank you so much for having me. I'm psyched to talk to you about this, it's going to be great. >> So Ericsson always has the biggest booth 14 years, you're disrupting Barcelona, people are not sure it's going to be on or off. It's officially on, it's happening and there's going to be a physical event, we're coming out of COVID still a risky move. It's going to be a big hybrid event, it's going to be in person. Tell us the story. How did you guys come out of nowhere, a disruptor take the biggest real estate in the place and turn it into a community event, a news event, a media event, everything, tell us. >> Yeah, well, I think it was March 9th, a little over a month ago. Ericsson announced that they were pulling out of MWC and it's very analogous to what happened in 2020. They were one of the first vendors to bail as well. And it kind of started this like tidal wave of people saying, can't do it. And I think the distinction now is that, that was at the beginning of COVID, there's a lot of unknowns. Is it coming, is it not, is it safe, is it not? We're now, year 50 to three, four months into it. I think that when you look at where we are now, cases are trending down, the vaccine is up. And I think the legacy players were sort of backward looking. They're like, this is a repeat of 2020 it's not safe to go, we're going to pull out. And I'm like with the a hundred days to go, in the vaccine ramping, I think I see the different way. I think there's a really big opportunity. John Hoffman, CEO of the GSMA had put out a two page missive on LinkedIn where he was personally responding to questions, about how serious they were about making sure that the event was safe and could be held. And my view was this is going to happen. And with Ericsson pulling out, I mean this is hollowed ground. I mean, this is massively successful company that has customers literally trained like Skinner's chickens to come to the same spot every year. And now I get to put out my shingle right there and say welcome and show them the future. And instead of the legacy past and all the normal rhetoric that you hear from those sort of dinosaurs, Ericsson and Nokia, now they're going to hear about the public cloud. And I'm really excited for this opportunity. I think the ROI on this event is instant. And so it was a pretty easy decision. I think I thought about it for about 30 seconds. >> It's a real bold move. And again it's a risk that pays off if it happens, if it doesn't, didn't happen, but it's like the startups that put a Superbowl commercial off for the first time. It's a big hit and it's a big gamble that pays off huge. Take us through, how did it all happen? Did you just wake up and saw it was open? How did you know that it was open? Was it like, does an email go out and say, hey I got this huge space for 55 years. >> Well, I mean, it was big news. It was big news in the industry that they were pulling out and all other journalists were like, oh, here we go again. Everyone's going to bail, who's next, right? And everyone was sort of like building that sort of negative momentum energy. And I'm like, we got to squash this. So I put out a tweet on Twitter. I mean, I'm not the most followed person but I'm kind of known in Telco. And I was like, hey, GSMA, I'll take over the booth. And I don't think people even liked my tweet, right? Like no likes no retweets. I reached out to a couple of journalists. I'm like, let's do an interview, let's do a story. Everyone's like, we'll have you on the podcast, like in a month, I'm like, what's? So when John Hoffman had put out that letter I had connected to him. And so I was like, oh, I'm connected to the CEO of the GSMA. So I went out on LinkedIn and I referenced the story and I said, John Hoffman, I'll take over the booth. And I think about 30 minutes later he responded and said, let's do it. And I said, great, who do I talk to? And I was in touch with someone within a couple of hours. And I think we put the whole deal together in 48. And I think wrote the press release and announced it on Friday. So happened on Tuesday the 9th, announced by that Friday. And I really, I was like, GSMA, we've got to get this out, and we got to stop the negative momentum of the show, and get people to realize it's going to be different in June. This is going to happen, let's go do it. And so I think they're psyched that I stepped into the booth. It's a big booth it's 65,000 square feet. 6,000 square meters for the rest of the world that use the metric system. And I mean, that's huge. I mean, that's the size of a professional pitch in a football field, a soccer field. That's a one and a half football fields. It's a ton of space, it's a ton of space to fill up. >> I think what's interesting, as this points out that this new business model of being connected you were on LinkedIn, you connect to them, you get a deal done so fast. This is the direct to consumer as a start up, you're literally took over the Primo space, the best face in the area, so congratulations. And the other thing that's notable and why I'm excited to talk to you is that this kind of sets the table for the first global, what I call hybrid event. This will probably be a cornerstone case study in and of itself, because we're still kind of coming out of the pandemic. People are getting vaccinated, people want to fly, they want to get out of the house. You're partnering with theCUBE, and the CUBE 365 platform. And we love hybrid, we love doing events, theCUBE, that's what we do with video. Now, we're going to do a partnership with you to create this hybrid experience. What can people and guests who come to Barcelona or watch remotely expect? >> Yeah so, I think there's a couple of experiences that we're trying to drive in the booth. I think obviously demonstrations, I can't fill 65,000 square feet on my own. I'm a startup small company. And so I am inviting like-minded, forward thinking companies to join me in the booth. I'm paying for it providing a turnkey experience for those vendors. And so I think what we have in common is we're thinking about future technologies, like open ran on the network side and obviously public cloud which is a big part of my message. And so first and foremost, come and see the companies that are driving the change, the new technologies that are out there, and what's available for carriers to start to adopt and think about. MWC is a meeting intensive event. Deals are done at this show. In 2019, I think the stat is $65 billion of deals were put together at the show. And so a big component of the booth will be a place for executives to come together and have private conversations. And so we're going to have that. So that's going to be a big piece of it. And I think the third part is driving education and thought leadership. And so there's going to be a whole talk track, right? Tech topics, business topics, customer case studies, involve the hyperscalers, and really start to educate the telco community around these new technologies. But there'll be shorter talks. They won't be like hour long keynotes. We're talking 15, 20 minutes. And I think one thing that we're going to do with you as you were just talking about with the CUBE is, you know, MWC was the first big show to have to cancel with COVID, I think in 2019, sorry, 2020, the dates, it's always the last Monday in February and the rest of that week. And so that's like right at the beginning of the COVID stuff, Italy was just starting to take off. And so it was one of the first shows that had to make a big call and decide to cancel, which they did. This is going to be one of the first shows that comes back online post COVID, right? And so I don't think things just snap back to the way that they used to be. I don't think we as consumers are going to snap back to the way that we were operating, we're now used to being able to get curbside delivery from any restaurant in the city. I mean, it's just a sort of a different expectation. And so partnering with the CUBE, we really want to provide an experience that brings the virtual people into the booth. Typically in events like this, you really have to be there to see it. Booths are kind of like unveiled the day of the show, what's going on. One thing I'm trying to do is really educate people about what you can expect. What can you see? This is what it's going to look like. And so we're going to start to share some pictures of the booth of what it looks like. Number one, to drive excitement with the partners that are coming, right? Like you're going to be part of something really, really fabulous. I think number two, attendees can wait, I don't know week off, to make the decision to go. And so maybe if COVID continues to trend down and vaccines are picking up steam, maybe they're like it's safe for me to go and I want to go be a part of that. But I think from here on now we're going to have sort of that virtual experience. It's always going to be part of shows. And so we're going to experiment with you guys. We're going to have a live streaming event, over the course of all MWC. It's going to be a way for people who are unable to travel or can't afford it, COVID or whatever, see what's going on in the booth. And it's going to be everything from listen to a talk, to watch what you guys are typically famous for, your awesome interviews. We're going to have man on the street, like we're here at at a demo station, take us through your little demo. We're going to have telepresence robots that people can reserve. And cruise through the booth the robot can go to a talk. The robot can watch on this streaming thing, the robot can go to a demo. The robot can go to a meeting and it's controlled by the the virtual attendees. And so experimenting, right? Like how do we make this great for virtual people? How do we make the virtual people feel part of the physical? How do the physical people feel the virtual people that are attending and really just make it feel like a community or both. So, we're excited. >> That's super awesome, and first of all, thank you for having paying for everyone and including theCUBE in there. But I think this speaks to the ecosystem of open, you're creating an open ecosystem. And I think that is a huge thing. So for people who are at Mobile World Congress in Barcelona this is going to be a nice, safe place to hang space as well as get deals done. As we comfortable doing media center, we'll get you on the digital TV, but also you're also designing what I call the first hybrid experience, not just having people, having on-demand videos on their website, connecting Barcelona with other parts of the world, with media and stories and content. I think that to me is going to be a great experiment slash upgrade. We'll see, we'll get to see it how it goes. >> Well, it was really, I mean, we all lived through 2020. I mean, some of the shows went on, AWS's re-invent happened, Google did like a crazy nine week program. It's very lonely to participate in those virtual events. You kind of log on by ourselves. No one's really tweeting about it. You're watching an event, the event is great but it was really lonely. And so I think what people love about the physical events is we're together and we're networking and we're meeting people and so, I think continuing to evolve that experience so that virtual is not as lonely. So we'll see, we'll see how it goes. >> I got to say your vision is really aligned with us and others that are in this open innovation world. Because if you look at like theCUBE, physical went away, we had no events, we did CUBE Virtual, a new brand. It wasn't a pivot, it was an extension, a line extension of theCUBE. Now theCUBE's coming back to the physical, we're going to bring that CUBE Virtual to connect everybody. So this is it, and it just amplifies the value of the physical event. So if done right, it's so much cooler. So that's cool. And what I want to ask you on the physical side to kind of bring it back to physical is, there's still going to be keynotes, there's still going to be talks at Mobile World Congress, and so I saw that scheduled and I just saw last week, GSM may announced you're going to be doing a keynote speech. That's amazing, so, how did that happen? So give us the lowdown on the keynote that you're doing. >> I'm sure the entire industry is like that happened. And it probably has something to do with the fact that I have one of the biggest booths at the space. I always put in a request to speak. I feel that I have a really exciting message to share with the industry. Over the last, I guess it's been nine or 10 months, I really been trying to amplify my voice. I have a podcast, I have a newsletter, I'm talking to execs. I have a list that I literally go down one by one stalking each executive of like, have I talked to them? Like how I told them about like the power of the public cloud. And so I am super thankful that I have this opportunity to spread that this message and I'm planning a really epic talk. I really want to shake the industry And this is my opportunity, right? This is my opportunity to stand on the biggest stage in our industry and command a presence and send out my message. And I'm absolutely thrilled to go do it. And I hope I crush it, I hope it's like a mic drop experience. And can't wait to do it. >> Well, we're looking forward to covering it. And we love the open vision. We love the idea of public cloud and the enablement and the disruption. Because just like you got the deal so fast you can move fast with modern applications with the cloud, moving at cloud scale, complete content game changer, so great stuff. So totally applaud that looking forward to and we're here cheer you on and ask the tough questions. I do want to get to... On Twitter yesterday though, you put out on tweetstorm on Twitter about the plans kind of teasing out the booth, how are you going to plan to build the booth. Are you worried that you're opening up too much of the kimono here and putting too much on the table 'cause it's usually a secret. Mobile World Congress is supposed to be secret, not publicly out there. What's the-- >> Well, I mean, I think this is just a little bit of a change has happened post COVID, right. People usually build their booth at don't reveal it until the first day of the show and it's kind of like this excitement to go see what is their big message and what's the big reveal. And there's always fun stuff. I think this years will be different as a first, like I said, a first big event back. I think I need to create a little bit of excitement for people who are going and maybe entice people that maybe you should think about coming. I realized this is a super personal decision, right? It depends on where you are and the country and your health and your status. But if you can do it, I want people to know that you're going to miss out. It's going to be super fun. So, yeah. >> Let's take a look at the booth 'cause I'm sure my next question wants to see. I know we have guys, do we have that rendering... Let's pull that up and let's talk this through. Let's go look at the rendering. So you can see here on the screen... Take us through this. >> Yeah, so what we want to do is give the sense of of cloud city and that's what we're calling the space. In cloud city there's outdoor space, like you see here. And then there's an indoor space. And indoors is where you work, where you buy, where you meet. And so you can see here on the left, the demonstration that would have different vendors displaying and it goes way back. I mean, what we're feeling like I said is like a football field, an American football field and a half or a European football field, a pitch. It's pretty extensive. And so we think we're going to have, I don't know, 20, 30 vendors showing their different software. I think we're scheduling or planning for about 24 different meeting rooms that we can schedule. All COVID safe with the space requirements in there. But in that outdoor space, it would be where you learn, the education. And then I think we're going to have this fabulous booth for theCUBE. It's going to look just so amazing with the backdrop of this amazing building. And I think I underappreciated or didn't really realize how devastated the event planning industry has been from COVID as well as construction. Obviously when events were shut down, these companies had to lay off thousands of workers. Some of the big firms have laid off 50% of their workforce. And those people they didn't just go home and sit around, they had to come up with a livelihood and those people have pivoted into another job. And they're not really, I mean, events aren't really back yet. So some of these firms are shrunk. The manpower is severely reduced. But then I think on the other side is, and you can see this in just housing construction. There's a lumber shortage, there's a shortage of materials. And so everything that we source for the booth, pretty much has to come from Spain. And so when we look at the booth, we have a pretty significant ceiling, where it looks like the roof of the building. It's an engineering feat to do that we're still working through the... I'm sure someone with a protractor is doing lots of math. The glass, we have those huge beautiful glass spans in the front. Getting a glass that spans that height, I think it's 18 feet. It's six meters tall. That's going to be hard. Things like the flooring. I want to have like hardwood laminate flooring. So it looks like hardwood floors. Don't know if we can find them. There like, why don't you do carpet? I'm like, can you just check one more vendor. I really want my floor. So we'll see how it goes. And yeah, I think that sharing this plan, the trials and tribulations, like how can this small startup, take over a space that usually takes nine months to plan, right? Who is this girl? What is she doing? How are they going to pull this off? I think it's like, grab your popcorn and watch the train wreck or hero's journey. We get it done. And I'm obviously-- >> It's like keeping up with the Kardashians. It's the bachelor, it's theCUBE, reality TV show. We can keep track of everything. It's all the fun. >> No, totally. I don't know how many people would be interested in a reality TV show about how you build a booth but I find it absolutely fascinating. I think a lot of people have eyes on the GMA and MWC coming out of COVID and what does that look like, and what's the attendance like. And so I'm excited to share (murmurs) So, exact. >> Well, people are on clubhouse, they're bored, they want to get out. I think this is a case time. Mobile World Congress has a huge economic impact, as a show it's got its own little economy built around. It impacts the country of Spain in Barcelona, the city, a great city. People love it. And so it certainly is notable and newsworthy. We will be following that story. I have to ask you more kind of a tactical question if you don't mind, while I have you here. Can you talk about some of the vendors that are coming and the kinds of talks you're going to have inside the booth and how do people get involved? You mentioned it's open to people who love open ran and open public cloud, open technologies. I mean, that's pretty much everybody. That's cool and relevant, which is like almost the whole world now. Like, is it going to be a space as a criteria? How do people get involved? What's the collaboration formula? >> Yeah, no, I have been working on putting together a list of potential vendors. You'd be surprised, not everyone is as bullish as I am on the public cloud. And so there was a little bit of a filtering criteria but otherwise anyone can come. Enterprise software vendors in telco where their primary customer is communications service provider. That's their software runs on the public cloud, come on in. People using open ran. And it's still a little sort of small band of cohorts that are really trying to drive this new technology forward and they're going up against some of the biggest companies in telco, right? They're going up against Huawei, they're going up against Ericsson. Both those guys are very anti and they're not really pro open ran 'cause it's hugely disruptive to their business. And so I'm pretty sure those guys are not psyched to see open ran become a thing in telco. And so it's really sort of about disruptive technologies that are in the booth. And so yeah, I'm paying for the space, I'm paying for the build-out, bring your demos, bring your people, come with your marketing message and let's build a community. And so we're talking to open ran vendors like Mavenir which is a pretty big name in the open ran space. I've been talking with Parallel Wireless in LTO Star. Those are also great players. Software vendors like to Tutoki, which is a talk that I did a little over a month ago about this new startup that has a web-scale charger that they're trying to put out there. Auria is another company that I'm really familiar with that has some cloud for software. And in little tiny startups like Sequence and some other up-and-comers that no one's heard of. So we're really excited to invite them into the booth. I've been secretly stalking Elon Musk, and Starlink and Space X to be a part of it. And we'll see. I'm kind of using Twitter and whatever I can to reach out and see if they want to be a part of it. But yeah, it really open arms. Not really excluding-- >> Well, Elon is very disruptive and you can reach out to him on Twitter. He's accessible. I mean, you've got to break through and he's antenna up for innovators, people who think differently, they love people who break down walls and markets lower open wins. I mean, we know there's a history, we've been covering it. I've been involved in all my career. People who bet against open always lose. It's happened in every single wave of innovation. So Elon's gettable. Let's get him. >> Who doesn't love Elon Musk? I mean, I think some people don't, I love him. He's my hero. I model a lot of the things that I do around his approach, his vision. 20 years ago, or close to 20 years ago, 2003, he said he was going to put people on Mars. And I think people laughed at him for being like the PayPal guy and this guy is crazy, but every year he makes progress against his goals. We have a relandable rocket. He's doing a manned mission this week, the second man mission or third man mission. The guy makes progress. And I think I'm on the same mission here. My mission is to move Telco to the public cloud. I think it's a long journey, right? I think people are like, who is this girl? And she's like 12 people and what's her story. And I'm like, I don't care. I have a singular mission is a quest. I am not going to stop until I move the industry to the public cloud. And it's my life's mission and I'm psyched to do it. >> Well, we love the mojo, we love your style. We love Elon Musk's mojo. And again, just to bring the dots together you have that same mindset, which is, love like Elon, he's a builder. He builds things and he delivers. So as you said, so... Danielle, I really appreciate the work you're doing. I love your philosophy. We're in total agreement. Open building. Doing it together as a collective, being part of something? This is what the world needs. You got a lot of great ideas in the works and we can't wait to hear them. And what you got coming up over the next 68 days. This is the first of many conversations together. Thank you. >> Yeah, that's going to be so awesome. Thank you so much for having me. Psyched to talk to you about it. >> Okay. Mobile World Congress is happening in Barcelona on the June 28th. It's going to be in person and it's going to be probably the biggest hybrid event to date. Be there, check out TelcoDR and theCUBE and the space that they took over 14 years at the helm there. Ericson had it, now it's TelcoDR. Danielle Royston, founder and CEO here with me from TelcoDR. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
And it's taken one of the I'm psyched to talk to you about and there's going to be a physical event, And instead of the legacy past And again it's a risk that And I think we put the This is the direct to And so there's going to be I think that to me I think continuing to I got to say your vision And I'm absolutely thrilled to go do it. and the disruption. I think I need to create Let's take a look at the booth And I think I underappreciated It's the bachelor, it's And so I'm excited to share I have to ask you more and Space X to be a part of it. and you can reach out to him on Twitter. I model a lot of the things that I do And again, just to bring the dots together Psyched to talk to you about it. the biggest hybrid event to date.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Danielle Royston | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Danielle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Huawei | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six meters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GSMA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
nine months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Parallel Wireless | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Elon Musk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
55 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
18 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
68 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Auria | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
March 9th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
65,000 square feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
GMA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
TelcoDR | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Elon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mars | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$65 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2003 | DATE | 0.99+ |
June 28th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Space X | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
nine | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tutoki | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two page | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Starlink | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mavenir | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
PayPal | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
6,000 square meters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
14 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ | |
over 14 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
MWC | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 30 seconds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
BOS18 Brian Hoffmann VTT
>>from >>Around the globe, it's the cube with digital coverage of IBM think 2021 brought to you by IBM. >>Welcome back to IBM Think 2021 we're gonna dig into the intersection of finance and business strategy. My name is Dave Volonte and you're watching the cubes continuous coverage of IBM thinking with me is brian Hoffman is the chief operating officer of IBM Global financing, brian, thanks for coming on the cube today. >>Good morning, Great to be here. >>Hey, good morning. So I think we've heard a lot about the impact of hybrid cloud ai digital transformation and I wonder as a finance person in a former CFO, what do you see? And how do you think about some of the key considerations and financials and strategies that are supporting these major projects? Right? We got to come to the CFO and say, hey, we want to spend some money and here's the benefit, here is the cost. How can see IOS and their teams work with CFOs to try to really accelerate that digital transformation. >>Great question. And actually that question, I think I might have answered it a little bit differently, like two years ago, a year ago before the pandemic, I think it's actually changed a little bit with pandemic in my experience is the CFO people would come into me for projects and there's three ways you can justify it, but you can justify short term immediate, quick payback kind of hitters, you can justify it with, you know, improving our efficiency or effectiveness, um you know, reducing costs in the long run, making the client experience better or more from a strategic point of view, um you know, growing revenue getting to new clients, improving margins right? And so the the hybrid cloud transformation journey really still addresses those three things and when we come in, a lot of people focus like I said, on that third strategic point, but but all three of those come into play, and what's really interesting now is is as I'm dealing with it, I'm talking to other Cfos. The pandemic is really, if you will throw in a wrinkle in here, right? So the clients that I'm talking to, the IBM clients, they have to operate their business very differently and and their business models, some of them are changing clearly. Their clients, their business models are changing their operating differently as well. Um So, so our clients have to react to that and Hybrid Cloud and that that that type of of a structure really can support that. So there's really an emphasis here now to act with much more speed on this journey to get moving on it to get there because you have to make these changes and doing those two things in concert really has a ton of business value. >>Yeah I mean the cfos that I've talked to in the C. I. O. S. It's really kind of industry dependent, right? If you're in airlines or hospitality was like uh we got to cut costs. A lot of organizations said okay we're gonna support remote workers put in V. D. I. Or deal with endpoint security or whatever it was. But we're actually gonna double down on our digital transformation. This is we're gonna lean into an opportunity for us to come out stronger. How did you guys approach it in terms of your own internal digital >>transformation? Yeah. We we we were working on our digital transformation uh a little bit before the pandemic and it kind of followed those those three uh those three items when they when they first started implementing it, they came in and said hey if we can if we can move to a cloud platform, our infrastructure savings will be pretty significant. You know the I. T. Infrastructure savings will be 30 to 40%. So you know, quick payback CFO types love that. So you know, we went forward with that. Um but then quickly we saw the real benefits of moving to a hybrid cloud strategy. So just as an example as we were making some of these changes, we found a workflow tool in one of our markets in europe, that was a great tool and uh if we wanted to implement that across the business um in the old days, You know, we're in 40 countries, we've got 2500 employees, three lines of business. It would have been very complex because our operating structure is is very robust, very complex. Um Probably have taken a year, two years to do that. But since we are now on a cloud platform we got that rolled out that workflow tool rolled out across our business in months, Saving 20-30 of of workload. Being much more um efficiently getting to our clients and reacting quickly to them. And in fact that tool got adopted across IBM because that cloud platform enabled that to happen. And then the great thing which I didn't even realize at the time but now thinking more strategically um are my I. T. Resource earlier was running at about 50 50 50 people working on maintenance. The kind of things with 50 on development as we've now transition to this cloud. My I. T. Resources now 70 plus percent dedicated to new development. So now we can go attack new things that really provide customer value in the pandemic. You know the first thing to look at is can we get into more um you know electronic contracts, E signatures, things that would provide value to customers anyway. But in the pandemic is like really a significant, you know differentiator for us. So all those things were enabled by that journey that we've been taking, >>interesting. I mean most of the CF I uh in fact every CFO I know of a public company took advantage of cheap debt and improving their balance sheets. And liquidity is not the problem today, especially in the tech industry at the same time. You know I'm interested in how companies are using financing. They don't want to necessarily build out data centers but they do want to fund their digital transformation. So what are you seeing in terms of how your customers are using financing? You know, what's the conversation like? What advice are you giving? >>Yeah. So um you know, it depends a little bit on the type of customer, like you said, you know, we we deal with a lot of the biggest, strongest customers in the world. And, and as we deal with them, financing really helps the return on their investment, right, aligning the payments of those cash flows for when they're getting the benefits. Uh And and we see a real good value in improving the return on those investments in helping, you know, if it's something that's going to go to the board that really makes a difference to them. Uh So, you know, that that's always been a value proposition. It continues to be. Um The other thing that's helping now, like you said, is even in this environment, people want to accelerate this transition. Um but it's a, it's a, it's a big time of uncertainty. So, you know, some of the smaller clients, some of the more uh you know, the industries that are a little more cash constrained airlines, et cetera, you know, they're looking for the the immediate cash flow benefits. Um But many of the cfos are saying, hey, listen, you know, I can I want to go as fast as I can help me put together a structure that lets me, you know, get this in place as quick as possible, but not below my budget is not make me take too much risk in this time of uncertainty, but keeps me moving and I think that's where financing really comes in as well. Um And we're kind of talking much more about that value proposition than just if you will be improved ri proposition that we've had all along. >>I want to talk a little bit more about IBM global financing. I mean, people, a lot of times people misunderstand it. You know when you look at I. B. M. S. Debt, you gotta you gotta take out the piece that IBM global financing because that's a significant portion and that's sort of self self fulfilling. But what do people need to know about IBM global financing, >>We actually run three different businesses and we've been transforming our strategy over time. So you know right now with with IBM being all in on hybrid, we are very focused on helping IBM and IBM clients on this digital journey on IBM growing their revenue. Um you know, we we in the past have been more of if you're really full service. It finance are doing a lot more than just IBM but we are really focused now on on helping IBM. So I think the best thing for for IBM clients to know is as you're talking to IBM about the total solution, the total value profit IBM brings that financing, that cash flow solution should be embedded in what they're looking at and can provide a lot of value. Um You know, the second thing I think most people know is we provide financing for IBM s channel, so you know, distributors, resellers etcetera, if you're an IBM distributor or reseller, you know about us, because just about 100% of IBM partners use us to provide that working capital financing, uh you know, we have a state of the art platforms were just so integrated with them. Again, I don't have to I don't have to do a sales pitch on that because they don't know us. Um and the third one just because people might not realize this is, we do haven't we call it an asset recovery business, um it's a pretty small business, you know, it's bringing back equipment that comes off lease, so that uh is used by IBM internally. Um and while, you know, it's not, it's not as well known, I'm pretty proud of it because it really does help with the focus that the world that IBM has on sustainability and reuse and um and making sure that, you know, we're treating the planet fairly here, so that that's a small but powerful piece of our business well, >>You're quite broader than leasing mainframes in the 80s, >>that's for sure. >>Talking more about give, you can double click on that sort of hybrid cloud and obviously machine intelligence is a big piece of those digital transformation. So, so how specifically are you, are you helping clients really take advantage of things like hybrid cloud? >>So yeah, so um what we have typically had been doing and I can give you a couple different examples if you will, you know, for larger clients. What we tend to be doing is helping them like I said, accelerate their business. So um, you know, they're looking to modernize their applications but they still have a big infrastructure in place and so they'll run into uh you know, budget constraints and and you know, cash is still be careful to managed. So for them we are much more typically focused on, you know, if you will project based financing that allows those cash flows to line up with the savings. Again, those are tend to be bigger projects that often go to boards that return benefit is very important. Ah a little bit different value proposition for more mid market customers. So, you know, as I was kind of just looking recently, we have a couple of different customers like form engineering um or or Novi still there to smaller uh compared to some of the other customers we use uh they are again much more focused on how do I, how do I conserve and best use my cash immediately? But they want to get this, they want to get this transformation going. So you know we provide flexible payment plans to them so they can go at the rate and pace that they need to, they can align up those cash deals with their budgets for their business cycles etcetera. So again, where smaller customers where timing of the cash flow in their business cycle is very important. We provide that benefit as well. >>You know, I wonder if I could ask you. So you remember of course the early days of public cloud, one of the first tail winds for public cloud was the pen was not the pandemic, the for the financial crisis of 2007. And a lot of CFO said, Okay let's shift to uh to an apex model. And now you can always provide financial solutions to customers. But it seems like today when I talk to clients, it's it's much more integrated, it's not just the public cloud, you can do that for on premises and again you always could do that. But it seems like there's much more simpatico uh in the way in which you provide that that that solution is that >>fair? Absolutely. And this might be a little to finance geeky, I don't know. But if you go back, well if you go back to the financial crisis and all that and at that time um a lot of people were looking to financing for you call that ah please. But you know if if I was talking about off balance sheet transactions right? Um and and you know between regulation etcetera etcetera, that that off balance sheet thing. First of all, people are seeing through it that much more clearly. But second, you know the the uh financial disclosure say you kind of have to show that stuff so that that if you will, window dressing benefit has gone away. So now which is great for me, we really get to talk about what's the real benefit, what is the, you know, what is the real benefit of? You know, you want to make sure that you have known timed expenditures. You know that if your business grows that your your expenses can grow evenly with those with that business growth, you don't have to take big chunky things and so you know uh financing under the covers of an integrated solution and IBM has a lot of those integrated solutions allows businesses to have that, you know, known timing known quantities. Most of the benefits that people were looking for from that affects cloud model. Um without, you know, some of the problems that you have, when you try to have to go straight to a public cloud for very, you know, big sensitive businesses, confidential confidential data etcetera. >>Thanks for that. So, okay, we're basically out of time. But I wonder if you could give us the bumper sticker and key takeaways, maybe you could summarize for our audience. >>Yeah. For those that noah global financing or dealing with IBM, my view would be in the past we might have been a little more, you know, out there with our own with our own banner etcetera. In the future. I think that you should expect to see us very well integrated into anything you're doing. I think our value proper is clear and compelling and and and will be included uh in these hybrid con transformations to the benefit of our clients. So that's that's our objective and we're well on our way there. >>Great. Anywhere, anywhere I'm gonna go for more, more familiar, obviously IBM dot com. You got some resources there. But there is >>there any Absolutely dot com? There's there's a thank you. Just probably a slash financing. But yeah, there's >>were >>loaded with information of people. >>Excellent brian thanks so much for coming to the cube. Really great to have you today. >>I appreciate the time. >>My pleasure. Thank you for watching everybody's day. Volonte for the Cuban. Our coverage of IBM think 2021, the virtual edition right back.
SUMMARY :
think 2021 brought to you by IBM. Welcome back to IBM Think 2021 we're gonna dig into the intersection of finance and And how do you think about some of the key my experience is the CFO people would come into me for projects and there's three ways you can justify How did you guys approach it in terms of your own internal digital You know the first thing to look at is can we get into more um you know electronic contracts, So what are you seeing in terms of how Um But many of the cfos are saying, hey, listen, you know, I can I You know when you look at I. B. M. S. Debt, you gotta you gotta take out the piece that IBM Um and while, you know, it's not, it's not as well known, Talking more about give, you can double click on that sort of hybrid cloud and obviously machine place and so they'll run into uh you know, budget constraints and and you integrated, it's not just the public cloud, you can do that for on premises and again you always could do that. of those integrated solutions allows businesses to have that, you know, known timing known quantities. But I wonder if you could give us the bumper sticker and key I think that you should expect to see us very well integrated into anything you're doing. But there is But yeah, Really great to have you today. Thank you for watching everybody's day.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
brian Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2500 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Brian Hoffmann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
40 countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
third one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three ways | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
70 plus percent | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
IOS | TITLE | 0.97+ |
80s | DATE | 0.97+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
20-30 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Cfos | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
about 100% | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
financial crisis of 2007 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
V. D. I. | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
I. T. Resources | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
I. T. Resource | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
three items | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
IBM Global financing | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
IBM dot com | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
a year ago before | DATE | 0.88+ |
about 50 50 | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
three lines | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Volonte | PERSON | 0.83+ |
third strategic | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
50 people | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
day | EVENT | 0.71+ |
noah | PERSON | 0.59+ |
businesses | QUANTITY | 0.57+ |
C. I. | LOCATION | 0.56+ |
Debt | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.52+ |
think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.51+ |
BOS18 | OTHER | 0.43+ |
Cuban | PERSON | 0.41+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.4+ |
M. | ORGANIZATION | 0.36+ |
Jeff Boudreau, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2020
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Dell Technologies. World Digital experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Hello, everyone. And welcome back to the cubes Coverage of Del Tech World 2020. With me is Jeff Boudreau, the president general manager of Infrastructure Solutions group Deltek. Jeff, always good to see you, my friend. How you doing? >>Good. Good to see you. >>I wish we were hanging out a Sox game or a pat's game, but, uh, I guess this will dio But, you know, it was about a year ago when you took over leadership of I s G. I actually had way had that sort of brief conversation. You were in the room with Jeff Clark. I thought it was a great, great choice. How you doing? How you feeling Any sort of key moments the past 12 months that you you feel like sharing? >>Sure. So I first I want to say, I do remember that about a year ago. So thank you for reminding me. Yeah, it's, uh it's been a very interesting year, right? It's been it's been one year. It was in September was one year since I took over I s G. But I'm feeling great. So thank you for asking. I hope you're doing the same. And I'm really optimistic about where we are and where we're heading. Aziz, you know, it's been an extremely challenging year in a very unpredictable year, as we've all experienced. And I'd say for the, you know, the first part of the year, especially starting in March on I've been really focused on the health and safety of our, you know, the families, our customers and our team members of the team on a lot of it's been shifting, you know, in regards to helping our customers around, you know, work from home or education and learn from home. And, you know, during all this time, though, I'll tell you, as a team, we've accomplished a lot. There's a handful of things that I'm very proud of, you know, first and foremost, that states around the customer experience we have delivered on our best quality in our product. NPS scores in our entire history. So something I'm extremely proud of during this time around our innovation and innovation engine, we part of the entire portfolio which you're well aware of. We had nine launches in nine weeks back in that May in June. Timeframe. So something I'm really proud of the team on, uh, on. Then last, I'd say it's around the team and right, we shifted about 90% of our workforce from the office tow home, you know, from an engineering team. That could be, you know, 85% of my team is engineers and writing code. And so, you know, people were concerned about that. But we didn't skip a beat, so, you know, pretty impressed by the team and what they've done there. So, you know, the strategy remains unchanged. Uh, you know, we're focused on our customers integrating across the entire portfolio and the businesses like VM ware and really focused on getting share. So despite all the uncertainty in the market, I'm pretty pleased with the team and everything that's been going on. So uh, yeah, it's it's been it's been an interesting year, but it's really great. I'm really optimistic about what we have in front of us. >>Yeah, I mean, there's not much you could do a control about the macro condition on it, you know it. Z dealt to us and we have to deal with it. I mean, in your space. It's the sort of countervailing things here one is. Look, you're not selling laptops and endpoint security. That's not your business right in the data center. Eso. But the flip side of that is you mentioned your portfolio refresh. You know, things like Power Store. You got product cycles now kicking in. So that could be, you know, a buffer. What are you seeing with Power Store and what's the uptake look like? They're >>sure. Well, specifically, let me take a step back and the regards the portfolio. So first, you know, the portfolio itself is a direct reflection in the feedback from all our partners and our customers over the last couple of years on Day two, ramp up that innovation. I spent a lot of time in the last few years simplifying under the power brands, which you're well aware of, right? So we had a lot of for a legacy EMC and Legacy dollars. Really? How do we simplify under a set of brands really over delivering innovation on a fewer set of products that really accelerating in exceeding customer needs? And we did that across the board. So from power edge servers, you know, power Max, the high end storage, the Powerball, all that we didn't hear one. And just most recently. And, you know, it's part of the big launches. We had power scale. We have power flex for software to find. And, of course, the new flagship offer for the mid range, which is power store. Um, Specifically, the policy of the momentum has been building since our launch back in May. And the feedback from our partners and our customers has been fantastic. And we've had a lot of big wins against, you know, a lot of a lot of our core competitors. A couple examples one is Arrow Electronics SAA, Fortune 500 Global Elektronik supplier. They leverage power Store to provide, you know, basically both, you know, enterprise computing and storage needs for their for their broader bases around the world on there, really taking advantage of the 41 data reduction, really helping them simplify their capacity planning and really improve operational efficiencies specifically without impacting performance. So it's it's one. We're given the data reductions, but there's no impact on performance, which is a huge value proffer for arrow another big customers tickets and write a global law firm on their reporting to us that over 90 they've had a 90% reduction in their rack space, and they've had over five times two performance over a core competitors storage systems azi. They've deployed power store around the world, really, and it's really been helping them. Thio easily migrate workloads across, so the feedback from the customers and partners has been extremely positive. Um, there really citing benefits around the architecture, the flexibility architecture around the micro services, the containers they're loving, the D M or integration. They're loving the height of the predictable data reduction capabilities in line with in line performance or no performance penalties with data efficiencies, the workload support, I'd say the other big things around the anytime upgrades is another big thing that customers we're really talking about so very excited and optimistic in regards as we continue to re empower store the second half of the year into next year really is the full full year for power store. >>So can I ask you about that? That in line data reduction with no performance hit is that new ipe? I mean, you're not doing some kind of batch data reduction, right? >>No, it's It's new, I p. It's all patented. We've actually done a lot of work in regards to our technologies. There's some of the things we talk about GPS and deep use and smart Knicks and things like that. We've used some offload engines to help with that. So between the software and the hardware, we've had leverage new I. P. So we can actually provide that predictable data reduction. But right with the performance customers need, So we're not gonna have a trade off in regards. You get more efficiencies and less performance or more performance and less efficiency. >>That's interesting. Yeah, when I talked to the chip guys, they talk about this sort of the storage offloads and other offloads we're seeing. These alternative processors really start to hit the market videos. The obvious one. But you're seeing others. Aziz. Well, you're really it sounds like you're taking advantage of that. >>Yeah, it's a huge benefit. I mean, we should, you know, with our partners, if it's Intel's and in videos and folks like that broad comes, it's really leveraging the great innovation that they do, plus our innovation. So if you know the sum of the parts, can you know equal Mauritz a benefit to our customers in the other day? That's what it's all about. >>So it sounds like Cove. It hasn't changed your strategy. I was talking toe Dennis Hoffman and he was saying, Look, you know, fundamentally, we're executing on the same strategy. You know, tactically, there's things that we do differently. But what's your summarize your strategy coming in tow 2021. You know, we're still early in this decade. What are you seeing is the trends that you're trying to take advantage of? What do you excited about? Maybe some things that keep you up at night? >>Yeah, so I'd say, you know, I'll stay with what Dennis said. You know, it's our strategy is not changing its a company. You probably got that from Michael and from job, obviously, Dennis just recently. But for me, it's a two pronged approach. One's all about winning the consolidation in the core infrastructure markets that we could just paid in today. So I think Service Storage Network, we're already clear leader across all those segments that we serve in our you know, we'll continue to innovate within our existing product categories. And you saw that with the nine launches in the nine weeks in my point on that one is we're gonna always make sure that we have best debris offers. If it's a three tier, two tier or converge or hyper converged offer, we wanna make sure that we serve that and have the best innovation possible. In addition to that, though, the secondary piece of the strategy really is around. How do we differentiate value across or innovating across I S G? You know, Dell Technologies and even the broader ecosystems and some of the examples I'll give you right now that we're doing is if you think about innovating across icy, that's all about providing improved customer experience, a set of solutions and offers that really helped simplify customer operations, right? And really give them better T CEOs or better. S L. A. An example of something like that's cloud like it's a SAS based off of that we have. That really helps provide great insights and telemetry to our customers. That helps them simplify their I T operations, and it's a major step forward towards, you know, autonomous infrastructure which is really what they're asking for. Customers of a very happy with the work we've done around Day one, you know, faster, time to value. But now it's like Day two and beyond. How do you really helped me Kinda accelerate the operations and really take that away from a three other big pieces innovating across all technologies. And you know, we do this with VM Ware now live today, and that's just writing. So things like VX rail is an example where we work together and where the clear leader in H C I. Things like Delta Cloud Uh, when we built in V M V C F A, B, M or cloud foundation in Tan Xue delivering an industry leading hybrid cloud platform just recently a VM world. I'm sure you heard about it, but Project Monterey was just announced, and that's an effort we're doing with VM Ware and some other partners. They're really about the next generation of infrastructure. Um, you know, I guess taking it up a notch out of the infrastructure and I've g phase, you know, some of the areas that we're gonna be looking at the end to end solutions to help our customers around six key areas. I'm sure John Rose talking about the past, but things like cloud Edge five g A i m l data management security. So those will be the big things. You'll see us lean into a Z strategies consistent. Some big themes that you'll see us lean into going into next year. >>Yeah, I mean, it is consistent, right? You guys have always tried to ride the waves, vector your portfolio into those waves and add value. I'm particularly impressed with your focus on customer experience, and I think that's a huge deal. You know, in the past, a lot of companies yours included your predecessor. You see, Hey, throwing so many products at me, I can't I don't understand the portfolio. So I mean, focusing on that I think is huge right now because people want that experience, you know, to be mawr cloudlike. And that's that's what you got to deliver. What about any news from from Dell Tech world? Any any announcements that you you wanna highlight that we could talk about? >>Sure. And actually, just touching back on the point you had no about the simplification that is a major 10 of my in regards the organization. So there's three key components that I drive once around customer focus, and that's keeping customers first and foremost. And everything we do to is around axillary that innovation. Engine three is really bringing everything together as one team. So we provide a better outcome to our customers. You know, in that simplification after that you talk about is court toe what we're driving. So I want to do less things, I guess better in the notion of how we do that. What that means to me is, as I make decisions that want to move away from other technologies and really leverage our best of breed type shared type, that's technology. I p people I p I can, you know, e can exceed customer needs in those markets that were serving. So it's actually allows me to x Sorry, my innovation engine, because I shift more and more resource is onto the newer stock now for Del Tech world. Yes, We got some cool stuff coming. You probably heard about a few of them. Uh, we're gonna be announcing a project project Apex. Hopefully you've been briefed on that already. This isn't new news or I'll be in trouble. But that's really around. Our strategy about delivering, simple, consistent as a service experiences for our customers bringing together are dealt technology as a service offering and our cloud strategy together. Onda also our technology offerings in our go to market all under a single unified effort, which Ellison do would be leading. Um, you know, on behalf of our executive leadership team s, that's one big area. And there is also another big one that I'll talk about a sui expand our as a service offers. And we think there's a big power to that in regards to our Dell Technologies. Cloud console solving will be launching a new cloud console that will provide uniformed experience across all the resources and give users and ability toe instantly managed every aspect of their cloud journey with just a few clicks. So going back to your broader point, it's all about simplicity. >>Yeah, we definitely all over Apex. That's something I wanted to ask you about this notion of as a service, really requiring it could have a new mindset, certainly from a pricing and how you talk about the customer experience that it's a whole new customer experience. Your you're basically giving them access. Thio What I would consider more of a platform on giving them some greater flexibility. Yeah, there's some constraints in there, but of course, you know the physical only put so much capacity and before him. But the idea of being ableto dial up, dial down within certain commitments is, I think, a powerful one. How does it change the way in which you you think about how you go about developing products just in terms of you know, this AP economy Infrastructure is code. How how you converse about those products internally and externally. How would you see that shaking >>out Dave? That's an awesome question. And it's actually for its front center. For everything we do, obviously, customers one choice and flexibility what they do. And to your point as we evolved warm or as a service, no specific product and product brands and logos on probably the way of the future. It's the services. It's the experience that you provide in regards to how we do that. So if you think about me, you know, in in infrastructure making infrastructure as a service, you really want to define what that customer experiences. That s L. A. That they're trying toe realize. And then how do we make sure that we build the right solutions? Products feature functions to enable that a law that goes back to the core engineering stuff that we need to dio right now, a lot of that stuff is about making sure that we have the right things around. If it's around developer community. If it's around AP rich, it's around. SdK is it's all about how do we leverage if it's internal source or external open source, if you will. It's regards to How do we do that? No. A thing that I think we all you know what you're well aware but we ought to keep in mind is that the cloud native applications are really relevant. Toe both the on premises, wealthy off premise. So think about things around portability reusability. You know, those are some great examples of just kind of how we think about this as we go forward. But those modern applications were required modern infrastructure, and regardless of how that infrastructure is abstracted now, just think about things like this. Aggregation or compose ability or Internet based computing. It's just it's a huge trend that we have to make sure we're thinking of. So is we. We just aggregate between the physical layers to the software layers and how we provide that to a service that could be think of a modern container based asset that could be repurposed. Either could be on a purpose built thing. It could be deployed in a converge or hyper converged. Or it could be two points a software feature in a cloud. Now, that's really how we're thinking about that, regards that we go forward. So we're talking about building modern assets or components That could be you right once we used many type model, and we can deploy that wherever you want because of some of the abstraction of desegregation that we're gonna do. >>E could see customers in the in the near term saying, I don't care so much about the product. I want the fast one all right with the cheaper one e. >>It's kind of what you talking about, that I talked about the ways. If you think about that regards, you know, maybe it's on a specific brand or portfolio. You look into and you say, Hey, what's the service level that I'd wanted to your point like Hey, for compute or for storage, it's really gonna end up being the specific S l A. And that's around performance or Leighton see, or cost or resiliency they want. They want that experience in that that you know, And that's why they're gonna be looking for the end of the end state. That's what we have to deliver is an engineering. >>So there's an opportunity here for you guys that I wonder if you could comment on. And that's the storage admin E. M. C essentially created. You know, you get this army of people that you know pretty good of provisioning lungs, although that's not really that's a great career path for folks. But program ability is, and this notion of infrastructure is code as you as you make your systems more programmable. Is there a skill set opportunity to take that army of constituents that you guys helped train and grow and over their careers and bring them along into sort of the next decade? This new era? >>I think the the easy answer is yes, I obviously that's a hard thing to do and you go forward. But I think embracing the change in the evolution of change, I think is a great opportunity. And I think there is e mean if you look step back and you think about data management, right? And you think about all the you know all data is not created equal and you know, and it has a life cycle, if you will. And so if it's on edge to Korda, Cloward, depending think about data vaults and data mobility and all that stuff. There's gonna be a bunch of different personas and people touching data along the way. I think the I T advance and the storage admin. They're just one of those personas that we have to help serve and way talk about How do we make them heroes, if you will, in regards to their broader environment. So if they're providing, if they evolve and really helped provide a modern infrastructure that really enables, you know infrastructure is a code or infrastructure as a service, they become a nightie hero, if you will for the rest of team. So I think there's a huge opportunity for them to evolve as the technology evolves. >>Yeah, you talked about you know, your families, your employees, your team s o. You obviously focused on them. You got your products going hitting all the marks. How are you spending your time these days? >>Thes days right now? Well, we're in. We're in our cycle for fiscal 22 planning. Right? And right now, a lot of that's above the specific markets were serving. It's gonna be about the strategy and making sure that we have people focused on those things. So it really comes back to some of the strategy tents were driving for next year. Now, as I said, our focus big time. Well, I guess for the for this year is one is consolidation of the core markets. Major focus for May 2 is going to be around winning in storage, and I want to be very specific. It's winning midrange storage. And that was one of the big reasons why Power Store came. That's gonna be a big focus on Bennett's really making sure that we're delivering on the as a service stuff that we just talked about in regards to all the technology innovation that's required to really provide the customer experience. And then, lastly, it's making sure that we take advantage of some of these growth factors. So you're going to see a dentist. Probably talked a lot about Telco, but telco on edge and as a service and cloud those things, they're just gonna be key to everything I do. So if you think about from poor infrastructure to some of these emerging opportunities Z, I'm spending all my time. >>Well, it's a It's a big business and a really important one for Fidel. Jeff Boudreau. Thanks so much for coming back in the Cube. Really a pleasure seeing you. I hope we can see each other face to face soon. >>You too. Thank you for having me. >>You're very welcome. And thank you for watching everybody keep it right there. This is Dave Volonte for the Cube. Our continuing coverage of Del Tech World 2020. We'll be right back right after this short break
SUMMARY :
World Digital experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. the past 12 months that you you feel like sharing? especially starting in March on I've been really focused on the health and safety of our, you know, the families, But the flip side of that is you mentioned your portfolio refresh. So from power edge servers, you know, power Max, the high end storage, There's some of the things we talk about GPS and deep use and smart Knicks and things like that. These alternative processors really start to hit the market videos. I mean, we should, you know, with our partners, if it's Intel's and in videos and folks like and he was saying, Look, you know, fundamentally, we're executing on the same strategy. and some of the examples I'll give you right now that we're doing is if you think about innovating across icy, And that's that's what you got to deliver. You know, in that simplification after that you talk about is court toe what we're driving. How does it change the way in which you you think about how It's the experience that you provide in regards to how we do that. I don't care so much about the product. They want that experience in that that you know, So there's an opportunity here for you guys that I wonder if you could comment on. And you think about all the you know all data is not Yeah, you talked about you know, your families, your employees, So if you think about from poor infrastructure I hope we can see each other face to face soon. Thank you for having me. And thank you for watching everybody keep it right there.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Boudreau | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Clark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
May 2 | DATE | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
Deltek | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
85% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Rose | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Arrow Electronics SAA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
one team | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Power Store | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
nine weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Aziz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fiscal 22 | DATE | 0.99+ |
41 data | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Del Tech | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three key components | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Onda | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
next decade | DATE | 0.98+ |
two tier | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two points | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
June | DATE | 0.97+ |
about 90% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three tier | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Apex | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
one year | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Fidel | PERSON | 0.96+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Day one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Fortune 500 Global Elektronik | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
nine launches | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Dell Tech | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Project Monterey | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Service Storage Network | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Mauritz | PERSON | 0.93+ |
over five times | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Cloward | PERSON | 0.88+ |
Bennett | PERSON | 0.88+ |
Leighton | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
six key areas | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
over 90 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
past 12 months | DATE | 0.86+ |
Del Tech World 2020 | EVENT | 0.86+ |
Delta | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
second half | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
about | DATE | 0.82+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Abhishek (Abhi) Mehta, Tresata | CUBE Conversation, April 2020
from the cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world this is a cube conversation hey welcome back here writer jeff rick here with the cube we're in our Palo Alto studios you know kind of continuing our leadership coverage reaching out to the community for people that we've got in our community to get their take on you know how they're dealing with the Kovach crisis how they're helping to contribute back to the community to to bring their resources to bear and you know just some general good tips and tricks of getting through these kind of challenging times and we're really excited to have one of my favorite guests he's being used to come on all the time we haven't had them on for three years which I can't believe it sabi Mehta the CEO of true SATA founder to say to obby I checked the record I can't believe it's been three years since we last that down great to see you Jeff there's well first of all it's always a pleasure and I think the only person to blame for that is you Jeff well I will make sure that it doesn't happen again so in just a check-in how's things going with the family the company thank you for asking you know family is great we have I've got two young kids who have become video conferencing experts and they don't teach me the tricks for it which I'm sure is happening a lot of families around the world and the team is great we vent remote at this point almost almost two months ago down and can't complain I think their intellectual property business like you are so it's been a little easier for us to go remote compared to a lot of other businesses in the world and in America but no complaints it'll be very fortunate we are glad that we have a business and a company that can withstand the the economic uncertainty and the family's great I hope the same for the queue family I haven't seen Dave and John and it's good to see you again and I hope all of you guys are helped happy and healthy great I think in we're good so thank you for asking so let's jump into it you know one of the things that I've always loved about you is you know really your sense of culture and this kind of constant reinforcing of culture in your social media posts and the company blog post at true SATA you know celebrating your interns and and you really have a good pulse for that and you know I just I think we may even talked about it before about you know kind of the CEOs and leadership and and social media those that do and that and those that don't and you know I think it's it's probably from any kind of a risk reward trade-off you know I could say something group it versus what am I getting at it but really it's super important and in these times with the distributed workforce that the the importance and value of communicating and culture and touching your people frequently across a lot of different mediums and topic areas is is more important than ever before share with us kind of your strategy why did you figure this out early how have you you know kind of adjusted you know your method of keeping your team up and communicating absolutely like I guess I owe you guys a little bit of gratitude for it which is we launched our company and you know I'm showing a member on the cube it was a social media launch you know if you say that say it like that I think there are two or three things that are very important Jeff and you hit on all of them one is the emphasis on information sharing it becomes more important than times like these and we as as a society value the ability to share a positive conversation of positive perspective and a positive outlook more but since day zero at the seder we've had this philosophy that there are no secrets it is important to be open and transparent both inside and outside the company and that our legacy is going to be defined by what we do for the community and not just what we do for our shareholders and by its very nature the fact that you know I grew up in a different continent now live and call America now a different continent my home I guess I was it's very important for me to stay connected to my roots it is a good memory or reminder that the world is very interconnected unfortunately the pandemic is the is the best or worst example of it in a really weird way but I think it's also a very important point Jeff that I believe we learned early and I hope coming out from this is something that we don't lose the point you made about kindness social media and social networking has a massively in my opinion massively positive binding force for the world at the same time there were certain business models it tried to capitalize on the negative aspects of it you know whether they are the the commercialized versions of slam books or not so nice business models that capitalize on the ability for people to complain I hope that people society and us humans coming out of it learn from people like yourself or you know the small voice that I have on social media or the messages we share and we are kinda in what we do online because the ability to have networks that are viral and can propagate or self propagate is a very positive unifying force and I hope out of this pandemic we all realize the positive nature's of it more than the negative nature's of it because unfortunately as you know that our business models built on the negative forces of social media and I really really hope they're coming out of this are positive voices drown out the negative voices that's great point and and it's a great I want to highlight a quote from one of your blog's again I think you're just a phenomenal communicator and in relationship to what's going on with kovat and and I quote we are fighting fear pain and anxiety as much as we are fighting the virus this is our humble attempt to we'll get into what you guys did to help the thousands of first responders clerks rockstars but I just really want to stick with that kindness theme you know I used to or I still joke right that the greatest smile in technology today is our G from signal FX the guys are gonna throw up a picture of him he's a great guy he looks like everybody's favorite I love that guy but therefore signal effects and actually it's funny signal FX also launched on the cube at big data a big data show I used to say the greatest smile intact is avi Mehta I mean how can I go wrong and and what I when I reached out to you I I do I consciously thought what what more important time do we have than to see people like you with a big smile with the great positive attitude focusing on on the positives and and I just think it's so important and it segues nicely into what we used to talk about it the strata shows and the big data shows all the time everyone wanted to talk about Hadoop and big data you always stress is never about the technology it's about the application of the technology and you focus your company on that very where that laser focus from day one now it's so great to see is we think you know the bad news about kovat a lot of bad news but one of the good news is is you know there's never been as much technology compute horsepower big data analytics smart people like yourself to bring a whole different set of tools to the battle than just building Liberty ships or building playing planes or tanks so you guys have a very aggressive thing that you're doing tell us a little bit about is the kovat active transmission the coat if you will tell us about what that is how did it come to be and what are you hoping to accomplish of course so first of all you're too kind you know thank you so much I think you also were the first people to give me a hard time about my new or Twitter picture I put on and he said what are you doing RV you know you have a good smile come on give me the smile die so thank you you're very kind Jeff I think as I as we as you know and I know I think you've a lot to be thankful for in life and there's no reason why we should not smile no matter what the circumstance we have so much to be thankful for and also I am remiss happy Earth Day you know I'm rocking my green for Earth Day as well as Ramadan Kareem today is the first day of Ramadan and you know I I wish everybody in the world Ramadan Kareem and on that friend right on that trend of how does do we as a community come together when faced with crisis so Court was a very simple thing you know it's I'm thank you for recognizing the hard work of the team that led it it was an idea I came up with it you know in the shower I'm like there are two kinds of people or to your you can we have we as humans have a choice when history is being made which I do believe I do believe history is being made right whether you look at it economically and a economic shock and that we have not felt as humanity since the depression so you look at it socially and again something we haven't seen sin the Spanish blue history is being made in in these times and I think we as humans have a choice we can either be witnesses to it or play our part in helping shape it and coat was our humble tiny attempt to when we look back when history was being made we chose to not just sit on the sidelines but be a part of trying to be part of the solution so all riddled with code was take a small idea I had team gets the entire credit read they ran with it and the idea was there was a lot of data being open sourced around co-ed a lot of work being done around reporting what is happening but nothing was being done around reporting or thinking through using the data to predict what could happen with it and that was code with code we try to make the first code wonder oh that came out almost two weeks ago now when you first contacted us was predicting the spread and the idea around breaking the spread wasn't just saying here is the number of cases a number of deaths and know what to be very off we wanted to provide like you know how firefighters do can we predict where it may go to next at a county by county level so we could create a little bit of a firewall to help it from stop you know have the spread of it to be slower in no ways are we claiming that if you did port you can stop it but if he could create firewalls around it and distribute tests not just in areas and cities and counties where it is you know spiking but look at the areas and counties where it's about to go to so we use a inner inner in-house Network algorithm we call that Orion and we were able to start predicting where the virus is gonna go to we also then quickly realize that this could be an interesting where an extra you know arrow and the quiver in our fight we should also think about where are there green shoots around where can recovery be be helped so before you know the the president email announced this it was surrender serendipitous before the the president came and said I want to start finding the green shoes to open the country we then did quote $2 which we announced a week ago with the green shoots around a true sailor recovery index and the recovery index is looking at its car like a meta algorithm we're looking at the rates of change of the rates of change so if you're seeing the change of the rates of change you know the meta part we're declining we're saying there are early shoots that we if as we plan to reopen our economy in our country these are the counties to look at first that was the second attempt of code and the third attempt we have done is we calling it the odd are we there yet index it got announced yesterday and now - you're the first public announcement of it and the are we there yet index is using the government's definition of the phase 1 phase 2 phase 3 and we are making a prediction on where which are the counties that are ready to be open up and there's good news everywhere in the country but we we are predicting there are 73 different counties that ask for the government's definition of ready to open are ready to open that's all you know we were able to launch the app in five days it is free for all first responders all hospital chains all not-for-profit organizations trying to help the country through this pandemic and poor profit operations who want to use the data to get tests out to get antibodies out and to get you know the clinical trials out so we have made a commitment that we will not charge for code through - for any of those organizations to have the country open are very very small attempt to add another dimension to the fight you know it's data its analytics I'm not a first responder this makes me sleep well at night that I'm at least we're trying to help you know right well just for the true heroes right the true heroes this is our our humble attempt to help them and recognize that their effort should not go to its hobby that that's great because you know there is data and there is analytics and there is you know algorithms and the things that we've developed to help people you know pick they're better next purchase at Amazon or where they gonna watch next on Netflix and it's such a great application no it's funny I just finished a book called ghost Bob and is a story of the cholera epidemic in London in like 1850 something or other about four but what's really interesting at that point in time is they didn't know about waterborne diseases they thought everything kind of went through the air and and it was really a couple of individuals in using data in a new and more importantly mapping different types of datasets on top of it and now this is it's as this map that were they basically figured out where the the pump was that was polluting everybody but it was a great story and you know kind of changing the narrative by using data in a new novel and creative way to get to an answer that they couldn't and you know they're there's so much data out there but then they're so short a date I'm just curious from a data science point of view you know um you know there there aren't enough tests for you know antibodies who's got it there aren't enough tests for just are you sick and then you know we're slowly getting the data on the desk which is changing all the time you know recently announced that the first Bay Area deaths were actually a month were they before they thought they were so as you look at what you're trying to accomplish what are some of the great datasets out there and how are you working around some of the the lack of data in things like you know test results are you kind of organizing pulling that together what would you like to see more of that's why I like talking to you so I missed you you are these good questions of me excellent point I think there are three things I would like to highlight number one it doesn't take your point that you made with the with the plethora of technical advances and this S curve shift that these first spoke at the cube almost eleven years ago to the date now or ten years ago just the idea of you know population level or modeling that cluster computing is finally democratized so everybody can run complicated tests and a unique segment or one and this is the beauty of what we should be doing in the pandemic I'm coming I'm coming I'm quite surprised actually and given the fact we've had this S curve shift where the world calls a combination of cloud computing so on-demand IO and technical resources for processing data and then the on-demand ability to store and run algorithms at massive scale we haven't really combined our forces to predict more you know that the point you made about the the the waterborne pandemic in the eighteen eighteen hundreds we have an ability as humanity right now to actually see history play out rather than write a book about it you know it has a past tense and it's important to do are as follows number one luckily for you and I the cost of computing an algorithm to predict is manageable so I am surprised why the large cloud players haven't come out and said you know what anybody who wants to distribute anything around predictions lay to the pandemic should get cloud resources for free I we are running quote on all three cloud platforms and I'm paying for all of it right that doesn't really make sense but I'm surprised that they haven't really you know joined the debate or contribute to it and said in a way to say let's make compute free for anybody who would like to add a new dimension to our fight against the pandemic number one but the good news is it's available number two there is luckily for us an open data movement you know that was started on the Obama administration and hasn't stopped because you can't stop open movements allows people companies like ours to go leverage know whether it's John Hancock Carnegie Mellon or the new data coming out of you know California universities a lot of those people are opening up the data not every single piece is at the level we would like to see you know it's not zip plus 4 is mostly county level it's available the third innovation is what we have done with code but not it's not an innovation for the world right which is the give get model so we have said we will curate everything is available lie and boo cost anybody is used but they're for purposes and computations you want to enrich it every organization who gives code data will get more out of it so we have enabled a data exchange keep our far-off purple form and the open up the rail exchange that my clients use but you know we've opened up our data exchange part of our software platform and we have open source for this particular case a give get model but the more you give to it the more you get out of there and our first installations this was the first week that we have users of the platform you know the state of Nevada is using it there are no our state in North Carolina is using it already and we're trying to see the first asks for the gift get model to be used but that's the three ways you're trying to address the that's great and and and and so important you know in this again when this whole thing started I couldn't help but think of the Ford plant making airplanes and and Keiser making Liberty ships in in World War two but you know now this is a different battle but we have different tools and to your point luckily we have a lot of the things in place right and we have mobile phones and you know we can do zoom and well you know we can we can talk as we're talking now so I want to shift gears a little bit and just talk about digital transformation right we've been talking about this for ad nauseam and then and then suddenly right there's this light switch moment for people got to go home and work and people got to communicate via via online tools and you know kind of this talk and this slow movement of getting people to work from home kind of a little bit and digital transformation a little bit and data-driven decision making a little bit but now it's a light switch moment and you guys are involved in some really critical industries like healthcare like financial services when you kind of look at this not from a you know kind of business opportunity peer but really more of an opportunity for people to get over the hump and stop you can't push back anymore you have to jump in what are you kind of seeing in the marketplace Howard you know some of your customers dealing with this good bad and ugly there are two towers to start my response to you with using two of my favorite sayings that you know come to mind as we started the pandemic one is you know someone very smart said and I don't know who's been attributed to but a crisis is a terrible thing to waste so I do believe this move to restoring the world back to a natural state where there's not much fossil fuels being burnt and humans are not careful about their footprint but even if it's forced is letting us enjoy the earth in its glory which is interesting and I hope you don't waste an opportunity number one number two Warren Buffett came out and said that it's only when the tide goes out you realize who's swimming naked and this is a culmination of both those phenomenal phrases you know which is one this is the moment I do believe this is something that is deep both in the ability for us to realize the virtuosity of humanity as a society as social species as well as a reality check on what a business model looks like visa vie a presentation that you can put some fancy words on even what has been an 11-year boom cycle and blitzscale your way to disaster you know I have said publicly that this the peak of the cycle was when mr. Hoffman mr. Reid Hoffman wrote the book bit scaling so we should give him a lot of credit for calling the peak in the cycle so what we are seeing is a kind of coming together of those two of those two big trends crises is going to force industry as you've heard me say many for many years now do not just modernize what we have seen happen chef in the last few years or decades is modernization not transformation and they are different is the big difference as you know transformation is taking a business model pulling it apart understanding the economics that drive it and then not even reassembling it recreating how you can either recapture that value or recreate that value completely differently or by the way blow up the value create even more value that hasn't happened yet digital transformation you know data and analytics AI cloud have been modernizing trends for the last ten years not transformative trends in fact I've also gone and said publicly that today the very definition of technology transformation is run a sequel engine in the cloud and you get a big check off as a technology organization saying I'm good I've transformed how I look at data analytics I'm doing what I was doing on Prem in the cloud there's still sequel in the cloud you know there's a big a very successful company it has made a businessman out of it you don't need to talk about the company today but I think this becomes that moment where those business models truly truly get a chance to transform number one number two I think there's going to be less on the industry side on the new company side I think the the error of anointing winners by saying grow at all cost economics don't matter is fundamentally over I believe that the peak of that was the book let's called blitzscaling you know the markets always follow the peaks you know little later but you and I in our lifetimes will see the return to fundamentals fundamentals as you know never go out of fashion Jeff whether it's good conversations whether it's human values or its economic models if you do not have a par to being a profitable contributing member of society whether that is running a good balance sheet individually and not driven by debt or running a good balance sheet as a company you know we call it financial jurisprudence financial jurisprudence never goes out of fashion and the fact that even men we became the mythical animal which is not the point that we became a unicorn we were a profitable company three years ago and two years ago and four years ago and today and will end this year as a profitable company I think it's a very very nice moment for the world to realize that within the realm of digital transformation even the new companies that can leverage and push that trend forward can build profitable business models from it and if you don't it doesn't matter if you have a billion users as my economic professor told me selling a watermelon that you buy for a dollar or fifty cents even if you sell that a billion times you cannot make it up in volume I think those are two things that will fundamentally change the trend from modernization the transformation it is coming and this will be the moment when we look back and when you write a book about it that people say you know what now Jeff called it and now and the cry and the pandemic is what drove the economic jurisprudence as much as the social jurisprudence obvious on so many things here we can we're gonna be we're gonna go Joe Rogan we're gonna be here for four hours so hopefully hopefully you're in a comfortable chair but uh-huh but I don't I don't sit anymore I love standing on a DD the stand-up desk but I do the start of my version of your watermelon story was you know I dad a couple of you know kind of high-growth spend a lot of money raised a lot of money startups back in the day and I just know finally we were working so hard I'm Michael why don't we just go up to the street and sell dollars for 90 cents with a card table and a comfy chair maybe some iced tea and we'll drive revenue like there's nobody's business and lose less money than we're losing now not have to work so hard I mean it's so interesting I think you said everyone's kind of Punt you know kind of this pump the brakes moment as well growth at the ethic at the cost of everything else right there used to be a great concept called triple-line accounting right which is not just shareholder value to this to the sacrifice of everything else but also your customers and your employees and-and-and your community and being a good steward and a good participant in what's going on and I think that a lot of that got lost another you know to your point about pumping the brakes and the in the environment I mean we've been kind of entertaining on the oil side watching an unprecedented supply shock followed literally within days by an unprecedented demand shock but but the fact now that when everyone's not driving to work at 9:00 in the morning we actually have a lot more infrastructure than we thought and and you know kind of goes back to the old mob capacity planning issue but why are all these technology workers driving to work every morning at nine o'clock it means one thing if you're a service provider or you got to go work at a restaurant or you're you're carrying a truck full of tools but for people that just go sit on a laptop all day makes absolutely no sense and and I'd love your point that people are now you know seeing things a little bit slowed down you know that you can hear birds chirp you're not just stuck in traffic and into your point on the digital transformation right I mean there's been revolution and evolution and revolution people get killed and you know the fact that digital is not the same as physical but it's different had Ben Nelson on talking about the changes in education he had a great quote I've been using it for weeks now right that a car is not a is not a mechanical horse right it's really an opportunity to rethink the you know rethink the objective and design a new solution so it is a really historical moment I think it is it's real interesting that we're all going through it together as well right it's not like there quake in 89 or I was in Mount st. Helens and that blew up in in 1980 where you had kind of a population that was involved in the event now it's a global thing where were you in March 20 20 and we've all gone through this indeed together so hopefully it is a little bit of a more of a unifying factor in kind of the final thought since we're referencing great books and authors and quotes right as you've all know Harare and sapiens talked about what is culture right cultures is basically it's it's a narrative that we all have bought into it I find it so ironic that in the year 2020 that we always joke is 20/20 hindsight we quickly found out that everything we thought was suddenly wasn't and the fact that the global narrative changed literally within days you know really a lot of spearhead is right here in Santa Clara County with with dr. Sarah Cody shutting down groups of more than 150 people which is about four days before they went to the full shutdown it is a really interesting time but as you said you know if you're fortunate enough as we are to you know have a few bucks in the bank and have a business that can be digital which you can if you're in the sports business or the travel business the hotel business and restaurant business a lot of a lot of a lot of not not good stuff happening there but for those of us that can it is an opportunity to do this nice you know kind of a reset and use the powers that we've developed for recommendation engines for really a much more power but good for good and you're doing a lot more stuff too right with banking and in in healthcare telemedicine is one of my favorite things right we've been talking about telemedicine and electronic medicine for now well guess what now you have to cuz the hospitals are over are overflowing Jeff to your point three stories and you know then at some point I know you have you I will let you go you can let me go I can talk to you for four hours I can talk to you for but days my friend you know the three stories that there have been very relevant to me through this crisis I know one is first I think I guess in a way all are personal but the first one you know that I always like to remind people on there were business models built around allowing people to complain online and then using that as almost like a a stick to find a way to commercialize it and I look at that all of our friends I'm sure you have friends have lots of friend the restaurant is big and how much they are struggling right they are honest working the hardest thing to do in life as I've been told and I've witnessed through my friends is to run a restaurant the hours the effort you put into it making sure that what you produce this is not just edible but it's good quality is enjoyed by people is sanitary is the hard thing to do and there was yet there were all of these people you know who would not find in their heart and their minds for two seconds to go post a review if something wasn't right and be brutal in those reviews and if they were the same people were to look back now and think about how they assort the same souls then anything to be supportive for our restaurant workers you know it's easy to go and slam them online but this is our chance to let a part of the industry that we all depend on food right critical to humanity's success what have we done to support them as easy as it was for us to complain about them what have we done to support them and I truly hope and I believe they're coming out of it those business models don't work anymore and before we are ready to go on and online on our phones and complain about well it took time for the bread to come to my table we think twice how hard are they working right number one that's my first story I really hope you do tell me about that my second story is to your have you chained to baby with Mark my kids I'm sure as your kids get up every morning get dressed and launch you know their online version of a classroom do you think when they enter the workforce or when they go to college you and me are going to try and convince them to get in a oil burning combustion engine but by the way can't have current crash and breakdown and impact your health impact the environment and show up to work and they'll say what do you talk about are you talking about I can be effective I can learn virtually why can't I contribute virtually so I think there'll be a generation of the next class of you know contribute to society who are now raised to live in an environment where the choice of making sure we preserve the planet and yet contribute towards the growth of it is no longer a binary choice both can be done so I completely agree with you we have fundamentally changed how our kids when they grew up will go to work and contribute right my third story is the thing you said about how many industries are suffering we have clients you know in the we have health care customers we have banking customers you know we have whoever paying the bills like we are are doing everything they can to do right by society and then we have customers in the industry of travel hospitality and one of my most humbling moments Jeff there's one of the no sea level executives sent us an email early in this in this crisis and said this is a moment where a strong David can help AV Goliath and just reading that email had me very emotional because they're not very many moments that we get as corporations as businesses where we can be there for our customers when they ask us to be their father and if we as companies and help our customers our clients who area today are flying people are feeding people are taking care of their health and they're well if V in this moment and be there for them we we don't forget those moments you know those as humans have long-term memories right that was one of the kindest gentlest reminders to me that what was more important to me my co-founder Richard you know my leadership team every single person at Reseda that have tried very hard to build automations because as an automation company to automate complex human process so we can make humans do higher order activities in the moment when our customers asked us to contribute and be there for them I said yes they said yes you said yes and I hope I hope people don't forget that that unicorns aren't important there are mythical animals there's nothing all about profits there's nothing mythical about fortress balance sheet and there's nothing mythical about a strong business model that is built for sustainable growth not good at all cost and those are my three stories that you know bring me a lot of lot of calm in this tremendous moment of strife and and in the piece that wraps up all those is ultimately it's about relationships right people don't do business I mean companies don't do business with companies people do business with people and it's those relationships and and in strong relationships through the bad times which really set us up for when things start to come back I me as always it's I'm not gonna let it be three years to the next time I hear me pounding on your door great to catch up you know love to love to watch really your your culture building and your community engagement good luck I mean great success on the company but really that's one thing I think you really do a phenomenal job of just keeping this positive drumbeat you always have you always will and really appreciate you taking some time on a Friday to sit down with us well first of all thank you I wish I could tell you I just up to you but we celebrate formal Fridays that to Seder and that's what this is all so I want to end on a good on a positive bit of news I was gonna give you a demo of it but if you want to go to our website and look at what everything we're doing we have a survival kit around a data survival kit around kovat how am I using buzzwords you know a is let's not use that buzzword right now but in your in your lovely state but on my favorite places on the planet when we ran the algorithm on who is ready as per the government definition of opening up we have five counties that are ready to be open you know between Santa Clara to LA Sacramento Kern and San Francisco the metrics today the data today with our algorithm there are meta algorithm is saying that those five counties those five regions look like I've done a lot of positive activities if the country was to open under all the right circumstances those five look you know the first as we were men at on cream happy Earth Day a pleasure to see you so good to know your family is doing well and I hope we see we talk to each other soon thanks AVI great conversation with avi Mehta terrific guy thanks for watching everybody stay safe have a good weekend Jeff Rick checking out from the cube [Music]
SUMMARY :
in the cloud you know there's a big a
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Ben Nelson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
April 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
March 20 20 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jeff Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$2 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Richard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1980 | DATE | 0.99+ |
fifty cents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Warren Buffett | PERSON | 0.99+ |
jeff rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second story | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
90 cents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ford | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara County | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joe Rogan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mount st. Helens | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
North Carolina | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
73 different counties | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third attempt | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two young kids | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nevada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first story | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two seconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third story | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
two kinds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three ways | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three stories | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
LA | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
ten years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
89 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Harare | PERSON | 0.99+ |
a week ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
second attempt | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Earth Day | EVENT | 0.98+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
four years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four hours | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Santa Clara | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
five counties | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
1850 | DATE | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
first day | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Tresata | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Hoffman | PERSON | 0.98+ |
World War two | EVENT | 0.98+ |
two towers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
more than 150 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first installations | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five regions | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
ghost Bob | TITLE | 0.97+ |
avi Mehta | PERSON | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
third innovation | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Reseda | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Abhishek | PERSON | 0.96+ |
first week | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Todd Osborne, New Relic & Josh Hofmann, AWS | AWS re:Invent 2019
>>LA from Las Vegas. It's the cube covering AWS reinvent 2019 brought to you by Amazon web services and along with its ecosystem partners. >>Hey, welcome back everyone. Live cube covers here at reinvent 2019 in Las Vegas. I'm John, your host extracting the signal from the noise with Stu Miniman analysts at Silicon angle, the cube and Wiki bond. We've got two great guests talking about the ecosystem and the future of software and how customers are consuming it in the cloud. Todd Osborne G VP of alliances and channels at new Relic and Josh Hoffman, GM and global lead of ISB partner ecosystem of AWS. Guys, welcome to the cube. Thanks so much for having us. So guys, we're the top story to me at this show. So far as I'll see infrastructure at scale. The software development life cycle is continuing to evolve. We are more automation, more as Andy says, heavy lifting's being done, which means that application developers are going to get more and more goodness. Dev ops created infrastructure as code check. Now we've got data, tons of data everywhere. So we're, we're seeing an ISB Renaissance more software. You guys are out there writing software. So what you guys take so far of the impact of the ISV here, Josh, to talk about that because this is a big story, does >>massive, I mean if you walk around the floor, you'll see folks that are automating new ways of doing dev ops. You're looking at new ways of securing serverless functions. Um, you're looking at new types of storage. So you could go across every category of technology in this room and you will see an incredible amount of batim innovation. Our partners are really driving that. >>Talk about the relationship with AWS, new Relic, longstanding partnership. Where is it now? Where's it going? It's, I mean, it's off the charts. So even just the last year, the amount of momentum we've built together as has been fantastic. So we participated in a whole bunch of different programs. We've got dozens, hundreds of joint customers that were doing things together. I mean, just look at this event. It's just a, it's just astonishing. We operate in a lot of different partner models, um, from, from reselling, uh, with, with various partners to building technology programs to participating, uh, with Josh and team and our friends. Uh, our friend Dave McCann and team on a eight of us marketplace. Just a whole host of different things that just continue to, to, uh, expand the partnership at scale. And the consumer is ation of the software, the procurement process she's had Teresa crossing off from public sector, whether you're in the public sector or commercial procurement still stuck in 1995 it feels like, right? >>I mean, like, are they modernizing? They've got a lot more ways to get software with the marketplace. What are you guys seeing with customers? Is it really that bad? Am I over over it? It's not that bad, but you know what I'm saying? I mean, so from my perspective, one of the cool we're seeing is, um, AWS in the cloud. Providers are driving a consolidation of budget of modern stuff, of cloud, of, of all the new things that companies want to do. That's all getting consolidated either in a new groups or new budget cycles and AWS is making it really easy to participate in those. So through programs like the marketplace, through various other other initiatives that we're doing, we can combine what we want to achieve with, with what the customer wants to achieve, which is speed to market with, which is with what AWS wants to achieve, which is faster adoption of all the different services and bringing the right ecosystem along with it. >>So the modernization of the procurement cycles along with the monetization of the technology is really cool to watch. Well, I wanted to ask that before. I want to get to the question that I'm that interested Andy Jassy his point on this keynote, Hey, this is the first time I heard him talk like this. We see two types of developers and two types of customers. People want the low level building blocks, the builders and then a new set of customers who want solutions. Yup. This is, this is your wheelhouse. This is where the solution network kind of ecosystem is evolving very quickly. Can you guys share your observations on what that, what he means by that and what does it mean for customers? >>I'll share it in the context of what we're doing with new Relic. Um, when you think of the concept of a solution, a lot of our customers, hundreds of our enterprise customers are going through our migration programs. They need help making sure that what they're doing on prem is translating to what's happening in the cloud, what the applications are doing on prem, and how they're performing in the cloud. So we've collaborated with NewRelic over the last year and a half on a number of new, not just migration programs, but windows or views into how the applications are performing. And we've designed those specifically for customers who are going through those migrations. So you just take that one little category. Um, and it's an area where we're collaborating together to bring something that is a full solution to the customer for those who are going through that migration journey. >>Your take on the whole solution thing. Yeah. So we, uh, last year at reinvent, we announced really the first solution that new Relic had ever launched trying to meet that market need and we, we announced the cloud adoption solution. So everybody knows we've got this great platform with all these cool features. We had never really gone to market and said, not only do we just address application monitoring or infrastructure mining, we actually address the business outcome of migrating to the cloud and all the benefits of doing that. So we announced that as a methodology last year. We added to that over this, this past year because we've enhanced our platform to, uh, have this new capability that we call programmability, which is the ability to write applications on top of the new Relic platform. So we've built, and we launched today a cloud adoption solution application. Kind of a mouthful. >>But what it is, is it is, it's the ability to use our technology and our platform to very easily drop that into a customer and help them very quickly get time to value of delivering on a solution and ultimately achieving the business outcome they're looking for. Yeah, I taught actually. So as you know, I was at your conference earlier this year in New York city where you really defined what a platform should be. And just like Amazon, what you want is you want builders and you want them putting solutions on Dabo. It gives a little bit of the momentum of what you've seen since new Relic one, and then the rollouts. So I don't know the formal count, but I know we're way past the dozen applications that we launched since then. Uh, we also added several different features including logging and some other technologies. We've closed a bunch of different deals with these new technologies since then. >>Um, and then a couple of the cool things from the partner ecosystem that we've done is with the platform capabilities we have, uh, firstly we're now, uh, getting ready to embark on building our first technology partner program. So we were talking to dozens of different partners in this room about how they can build with us on new Relic to make the platform even stickier, uh, for our customers that can now integrate NewRelic with various other technologies. And then the second, uh, thing we were proud to announce today is we've, we've actually just signed a three new managed service providers. So kind of another partner motion that we're driving in this ecosystem. And the new, all the new features of the neurotic platform helped enable us, uh, to do some really cool things with the platform and also evolving business model, uh, to close. Uh, so we were excited to to close three, top 80 best partners, which is best been global, uh, uh, blaze clan and out of California mission cloud as three new partners that we, uh, just, uh, signed agreements with. >>So we're happy to do that. Yeah. When we talk about the transformation, you know, one of the biggest challenges for customers is their application portfolio. I noticed new Relic has two boosts here. There's one specifically just focused on serverless, which I think is awesome. It's got some cool things. They're very focused on that developer app dev deployment there. Um, but you know, your customers, they've got a broad spectrum of applications and that journey to transformation in a modern nation is going to take time. How do you deal with the spectrum of what they're dealing with? But Todd, maybe start with you and then Josh would love your viewpoints too. I mean the spectrum. Massive. So our biggest challenge is keeping up with everything and continuing to innovate with all the things that are happening. But again, the benefits of the platform that we have enables us to do that in the enhancements. >>We wait and we made this year, this year. Um, now that our platform is, is more open, we can connect data, collect data from multiple entities, not just the new Relic, uh, agents that we've, that we were built on. So, uh, the concept of observability and being able to observe the entire application environment, um, is built on the fact that data's gotta come from all these different places. Then we need to turn that around and curate it, uh, into the right experience and the right use case that the customer's looking for. So, uh, all I can say is that, uh, our, our company is built on innovation. We try and stay on the cutting edge of all that. Try and stay current with that and meet the customer's needs as, as everyone here is innovating like S easy at scale. Todd, talk about what's going on in New York. >>What's the coolest thing going out with new Relic right now? Cause Lou always comes on the Q lose to CEO and he's cool. We love him, but he's always got his hands in something. Yes, he got the observability down. Cloud operations becoming standard. That's a tailwind for you guys as a company. But what cool things are you guys working on right now? Um, I certainly can't do Lou any justice. So the customer stories and things and he comes up with are amazing, but you know, from an industry's perspective, like gaming is hot. Um, and it's just like media and entertainment is hot. So we're just doing some really cool things with some really cool customers. Um, maybe not as cool as Lou would be, but you know, customers like, uh, are really adopting our migration story and we're really driving some significant business together. So customers like world fuel services and fleet complete, uh, we've recently come out and announced the stories of how we're helping these companies migrate. >>And frankly that's what's, that's what's cool about it is like everyone wants to get on the cloud faster, do more faster, and we're, we're enabling that, uh, in some really cool customers. So I'll to get your both reactions just to memes that we're developing on the cube this week. One is called, one is cloud native. If you take the T out, it's cloud naive. Okay. So, and the other one is something that I use on my post when my Andy story I did was you got born in the cloud, which is clear benefits. There's no, there's no discussion there. Check winning builder, but reborn in the cloud as companies are becoming reborn, this isn't the Mike, not just migration. There's a fundamental mind shift shift. Yeah. This is a reborn enterprise. And if you're not be born in the cloud and you're probably not going to be around longer, that seems to be the message. What's your reaction to cloud native without the T and reborn in the cloud? >>Well, I think it's, I think it's an accurate statement. It's funny. It's the first I've heard it. I may steal it. If I can use it, please pass it on. I will. Um, I would say that from an APM perspective, many of our partners are in different phases of their journey. Um, and so everything that we do is around three anchor points, which is helping those companies build great software if they haven't already, or if they're making that transition. Once they've made that transition, how do we help them market the software? And then the third piece is really how do we help them sell it? So in the case of new Relic, um, we've got a number of folks around the world that are helping with that co-sale process based on the solutions that we've jointly defined. Um, and then we also help build out the channel because as AWS, we've got tens of thousands of consulting partners. So the idea when you talk about that journey of becoming cloud native is how do you help a partner through that? You've got to hit on all three of those pillars to do it right. The leadership's got to be there for the top. Totally. You've got to have board alignment. You've got to have executive sponsorship, you've got to have technical buying, all of it. >>You guys have a very savvy customer base, Bray cloud native observability. What is the naivety uh, um, issue? What are people mostly naive about? Cause if you don't do it right with instrumentation observability if you're naive about that, you're going to get bitten in the, you know what? Well being, being naive there is not having your observability platform in place. So, but, but you really can't anymore. The old world of if you had a monolithic application running on servers monitoring, sometimes it was optional or a nice to have something today. You couldn't, you could only afford on your most mission critical applications as soon as you flipped a dev ops, a bunch of cloud native technologies, um, modern applications, but on the most modern frameworks with entities that are, that have all these dependencies to make sure that application works. Monitoring is a must, must have an observability is a must have. >>So that's now even in day one, out of the box, out of the one and two, the in to the reborn comment. As soon as you cross that path, you report, you rebirth yourself every day. Like it's constant. You're releasing code daily or multiple times a day, and so there's no like reborn statement anymore. It's a completely agile process. System changeover. This is not just saying it. You got to really believe what you're doing. You have to measure improvement, which is what new Relic is great at because if you take what's happening now on premise and you go to that transformation, you've got to show that you've actually achieved not just savings, but you're helping developers be more efficient and so you, you can't prove that story without the before and after. Yeah, yeah. Love talking to the cloud native gurus that you guys are, congratulations on your marketplace and ISV success. It's only getting the beginning of that run. It's kicking butt. Congratulations. Hundreds of thousands of customers are buying and hundreds of thousands more talk congratulates a new rule. Always great to have you guys on X. Great, impressive company, great results. Always great team, great product cloud, native ashore. Props to that. Thanks for coming on. Appreciate shit. Thanks so much. I'm John here in the cube, extracting the signal in the noise day. Two of three days of wall-to-wall coverage. Two sets here on the ground. Thanks for watching. We'll be right back.
SUMMARY :
AWS reinvent 2019 brought to you by Amazon web services the impact of the ISV here, Josh, to talk about that because this is a big story, So you could go across every category of technology So even just the last year, I mean, so from my perspective, one of the cool we're seeing is, So the modernization of the procurement cycles along with the monetization of the technology is really cool to I'll share it in the context of what we're doing with new Relic. So everybody knows we've got this great platform with all these cool features. So as you know, I was at your conference earlier this year Um, and then a couple of the cool things from the partner ecosystem that we've done is with the platform But again, the benefits of the platform that we have enables us to do that in the enhancements. into the right experience and the right use case that the customer's looking for. So the customer stories and things and he comes up with are amazing, So, and the other one is something that I use on my post when my Andy story I did was you got born in the cloud, So the idea when you talk about that journey of becoming cloud native is how do you help a What is the naivety uh, You have to measure improvement, which is what new Relic is great at because if you take what's happening now on premise
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave McCann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Josh Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Josh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Todd Osborne | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
1995 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Todd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
third piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
NewRelic | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Josh Hofmann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Teresa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two types | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three new partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
LA | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lou | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first solution | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two boosts | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
ISB | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
dozen applications | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two great guests | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
hundreds of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Two sets | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
earlier this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
first technology partner program | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one little category | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Hundreds of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
past year | DATE | 0.92+ |
last year and a half | DATE | 0.92+ |
new Relic | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
around three anchor points | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Todd Osborne G | PERSON | 0.89+ |
three new managed service providers | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
both reactions | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Relic | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Dabo | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
tens of thousands of consulting partners | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Silicon angle | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
dozens of different partners | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
top 80 best partners | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Wiki bond | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
dozens, hundreds of joint customers | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
New Relic | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
Breaking Analysis: Dell Technologies Financial Meeting Takeaways
>> From the SiliconANGLE Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE! Now here's your host, Dave Vellante. >> Hi, everybody, welcome to this Cube Insights, powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis I want to talk to you about what I learned this week at Dell Technology's financial analyst meeting in New York. They gathered all the financial analysts, Rob Williams hosted it, he's the head of IR, Michael Dell of course was there. They had Dennis Hoffman who is the head of strategic planning, Jeff Clarke who basically runs the business and Tom Sweet, of course, who was the star of the show, the CFO, all the analysts want to see him. Dell laid out its longterm goals, it provided much clearer understanding of its strategic direction, basically focused on three areas. Dell believes that IT is getting more complex, we know that, they want to capitalize on that by simplifying IT. We'll talk about that. And then they want to position for the wave of digital transformations that are coming and they also believe, Dell believes, that it can capitalize on the consolidation trend, consolidating vendors, so I'll talk about each of those. And so let me bring up the first slide, Alex, if you would. The takeaways from the Dell financial analyst meeting. Let me share with you the overall framework that Tom Sweet laid out. And I have to say, the messaging was very consistent, these guys were very well-prepared. I think Dell is, from a management perspective, very well-run company. They're targeting three to 5% growth on what they're saying is a 4% GDP forecast. Or sorry, 4%, I have GDP here, it's really 4% industry growth. GDP's a little lower than that obviously. So this is IDC data, Gartner data, 4% industry growth. So that's an error on my part, I apologize. The strategies to grow relative to their competition. So grow share on a relative basis. So whatever the market does, again, not GDP, but whatever the market does, Dell wants to grow faster than the market. So it wants to gain share, that's its primary metric. From there they want to grow operating income and they want to grow that faster than revenue, that's going to throw off cash. And then they're going to also continue to delever the balance sheet. I think they paid down 17 billion in debt since the EMC acquisition. They want to get to a two X debt to EBITA ratio within 18 months. And what they're saying is, you know, they talked about, Tom Sweet talked about this consistent march toward investment-grade rating. They've been talkin' about that for awhile. He made the comment, we don't need to have a triple A rating but we want to get to the point where we can reduce our interest expense, and that will, 'cause they'll drop right into the bottom line. So they talked about these various levers that they can turn, some of them under the P and L, gaining share, some are their operating structure and their organizational structure, and one big one is obviously their debt structure. The other key issue here is will this cut the liquidity discount that Dell faces? What do I mean by that? Well, VMware has about a $60 billion valuation. Dell owns about 80% of VMware, which would equate to 48 billion. But if you look at Dell's market cap, it's only 37 billion. So it essentially says that Dell's core business is worth minus 11 billion. We used to talk about this when EMC owned VMware. Its core business only comprised about 40% of the overall value of the company, in this case because of the high debt, Dell has a negative value. And it's not just the high debt. Michael Dell has control over the voting shares, it's essentially a conglomerate structure, there's very high debt, and it's a relatively low margin business, notwithstanding VMware. And so as a result, Dell trades at a discount relative to what you would think it should trade at, given its prominence in the market, $92 billion company, the leader in every category under the sun. So that's the big question is can Dell turn these levers, drop EBITA or cash to the bottom line, affect operating income, and then ultimately pay down its debt and affect that discount that it trades at? Okay, bring up, if you would, Alex, the next slide. Now I want to share with you the takeaways from the Dell line of business focus. This really was Jeff Clarke's presentations that I'm going to draw from. Servers, we know, they're softer demand, but the key there is they're really faced tough compares. Last year, Dell's server business grew like crazy. So this year the comparisons are lessened. But there's less spending on servers. I'll share with you some of the ETR data. Storage, they call it holding serve, you saw last quarter I did an analysis, I took the ETR data and the income statement, it showed Pure was gaining share at like 22% growth from the income statement standpoint. Dell was 0% growth but is actually growing faster than its competitors. With the exception of Pure. It's growing faster than the market. So Dell actually gained share with 0% growth. Dell's really focused on consolidating the portfolio. They've cut the portfolio down from 80, I think actually the right number is 88 products, down to 20 by May of 2020. They've got some new mid-range coming, they've just refreshed their data protection portfolio, so again, by May of next year, by Dell Technologies World they'll have a much, much more simplified portfolio. And they're gaining back share. They've refocused on the storage business. You might recall after the acquisition, EMC was kind of a mess. It was losing share before the acquisition, it was so distracted with all the Elliott Management stuff goin' on. And kind of took its eye off the ball, and then after the acquisition it took awhile for them to get their act together. They gained back about 375 basis points in the last 18 months. Remember a basis point is 1/100th of 1%. So gaining share and their consistent focus on trying to do that. Their PC business, which is actually doin' quite well, is focused on the commercial segment and focused on higher margins. They made the statement that the PCs are kind of undersupply right now so it's helping margins. There's a big focus in Jeff Clarke's organization on VMware integration. To me this makes a lot of sense. To the extent that you can take the VMware platform and make Dell hardware run VMware better, that's something that is an advantage for Dell, obviously. And at the same time, VMware has to walk the fine line with the ecosystem. But certainly it's earned the presence in the market now that it can basically do what I just said, tightly integrate with Dell and at the same time serve the ecosystem, 'cause frankly, the ecosystem has no choice. It must serve VMware customers. The strategy, essentially, is to, as I say, capitalize on vendor consolidation, leverage value across the portfolio, so whether it's pivotal, VMware integration, the security portfolio, try to leverage that and then differentiate with scale. And Dell really has the number one supply chain in the tech business. Something that Dave Donatelli at HP, when he was at HP, used to talk about. HPE doesn't really talk about that supply chain advantage anymore 'cause essentially it doesn't have it. Dell does. So Jeff Clarke's reorganization, he came in, he streamlined the organization, really from the focus on R and D to product to collaboration across the organization and the VMware integration. I actually was quite impressed with when I first met Jeff Clarke I guess two years ago now, what he and the organization have accomplished since then. No BS kind of person. And you can see it's starting to take effect. So we'll keep an eye on that. The next slide I want to show you, I want to bring in the ETR data. We've been sharing with you the ETR spending intention surveys for the last couple of weeks and months. ETR, enterprise technology research, they have a data platform that comprises 4,500 practitioners that share spending data with them. CIOs, IT managers, et cetera. What I'm showing here is a cut off of the server sector. So I'm going to drill down into server and storage. So these are spending intentions from the July survey asking about the second half of 2019 relative to the first half of 2019. And this is a drill-down into the giant public and private firms. Why do I do that? Because in meeting the ETR, this is the best indicator. So it's big, big public companies and big private companies. Think Uber. Private companies that spend a ton of dough on IT. UPS before it went public, for example. So those companies are in here. And they're, according to ETR, the best indicators. What this chart shows, so the bars show, and I've shared this with you a number of times, the lime green is we're adding, we're new to this platform, we're new adoption. The evergreen is we're spending more, the gray is we're spending the same, the light red or pink is we're spending less, and the dark red is we're leaving the platform. So if you subtract the red from the green you get what's called a net score, and that's that blue line. And this is the overall server spending intentions from that July survey. The end is about 525 respondents out of the 4,500. And this is, again, those that just answered the question on server. So you can see the net score on server spend is dropping. And you can see the market share on server is dropping. The takeaway here is that servers, as a percentage of overall IT spend, are on a downward slope, and have been for quite some time. Back to the January '16 survey. Okay, so that's going to serve us. Let's take a look at the same data for storage. So if, Alex, if you bring up the storage sector slide, You can see kind of a similar trend. And I would argue what's happening here, a couple of things. You've got the CLOB effect, I'll talk about that some more, and you've also got, in this case, the flash, all-flash array effect. What happened was you had all-flash arrays and flash come into the data center, and that gave performance a huge headroom. Remember, spinning disk was the last bastion of mechanical movement and it was the main bottleneck in terms of overall application performance. IO was the problem. Well you put a bunch of flash into the system and it gives a lot of headroom. People used to over-provision capacity just for performance reasons. So flash has had the effect of customers saying, hey, my performance is good, I don't need to over-provision anymore, I don't need to buy so much. So that combined with cloud, I think, has put down the pressure on the storage business as well. Now the next slide, Alex, that I want you to bring up is the vendor net scores, the server spending intentions. And what I've done is I've highlighted Dell EMC. Now what's happening here in the slide, and I realize it's an eye chart, but basically where you want to be in this chart is in the left-hand side. What it shows is the spending intentions and the momentum from the October '18, which is the gray, the April '19, which is the blue, and then the July '19 which is the most recent one. Again, the end is 525 in the servers for the July '19 survey. And you can see Dell's kind of in the middle of the pack. You'd love to be in the left-hand side, you know, Docker, Microsoft, VMware, Intel, Ubuntu. And you don't want to be on the right-hand side, you know, Fujitsu, IBM, is sort of below the line. Dell's kind of in the middle there, Dell EMC. The next slide I want to show you is that same slide for storage. And again, you can see here is that on-- So this is vendor net scores, the storage spending intentions. On the left-hand side it's all the high growth companies. Rubrik, Cohesity, Nutanix, Pure, VMware with vSAN, Veeam. You see Dell EMC's VxRail. On the right-hand side, you see the guys that are losing momentum. Veritas, Iron Mountain, Barracuda, HitachiHDS, Fusion-io still comes up in the survey after the acquisition by Western Digital. Again, you see Dell EMC kind of holding serve in the middle there. Not great, not bad. Okay, so that's kind of just some other ETR data that I wanted to share. All right, next thing we're going to talk about is the macros market summary. And Alex, I've got some bullet points on this, so if you bring up that slide, let me talk about that a little bit. So five points here. First, cloud continues to eat away at on-prem, despite all this talk about repatriation, which I know does happen. People try to throw everything to the cloud and they go, whoa! Look at my Amazon bill, yeah, I get that. That's at the margin. The main trend is that cloud continues to grow. That whole repatriation thing is not moving the on-prem market. On-prem is kind of steady eddy. Storage is still working through that AFA injection. Got a lot of headroom from performance standpoint. So people don't need to buy as much as they used to because you had that step function in performance. Now eventually the market will catch up, all this digital transformation is happening, all this data is flowing through the system and it will catch up, and the storage market is elastic. As NAN prices fall, people will, I predict, will buy more storage. But there's been somewhat of a lull in the overall storage market. It's not a great market right now, frankly, at the macro level. Now ETR does these surveys on a quarterly basis. They're just about to release the October survey, and they put out a little glimpse on Friday about this survey. And I'll share some bullet points there. Overall IT spending clearly is softening. We kind of know that, everybody kind of realizes that. Here's the nuance. New adoptions are reverting to pre-2018 levels, and the replacements are rising. What does this mean? So the number of respondents that said, oh yes, we're adopting this platform for the first time is declining, and the replacements are actually accelerating. Why is that? Well I was at ETR last week and we were talking about this and one of the theories, and I think it's a good one, is that 2016, 2017 was kind of experimentation around digital transformation. 2018, people started to put things into production or closer to production, they were running systems in parallel, and now they're making their bets, they're saying, hey, this test worked, let's put this heavy into production in 2019, and now we're going to start replacing. So we're not going to adopt as much stuff 'cause we're not doing as much experimentation. We're going to now focus and narrow in on those things that are going to drive our business, and we're going to replace those things that aren't going to drive our business. We're going to start unplugging them. So that's some of what's happening. Another big trend is Microsoft. Microsoft is extending its presence throughout. They're goin' after collaboration, you saw the impact that they had on Slack and Slack stock recently. So Slack Box, Dropbox, are kind of exposed there. They're goin' after security, they've just announced a SIM product. So Splunk and IBM, they're kind of goin' after that base. The application performance management vendors. For instance, New Relic. Microsoft goin' after them. Obviously they got a huge presence in cloud. Their Windows 10 cycle is a little slower this time around, but they've got other businesses that are really starting to click. So Microsoft is one of the few vendors that really is showing accelerated spending momentum in the ETR data. Financial services and telcos, which are always leading spender indicators, are actually very weak right now. That's having a spillover effect into Europe, which is over-banked, if I can use that term. Banking heavy, if you will. So right now it's not a pretty picture, but it's not a disaster. I don't want to necessarily suggest this as like going back to 2007, 2008, it's not. It's really just a matter of things are softening and it's, you know, maybe taking a little breath. Okay, so let me summarize the meeting overall. Again, it was a very well-run meeting. Started at 9:00, ended at 12:00, bagged lunch, go home. Nice and crisp. So these guys are very well-prepared. I think, again, Dell is a extremely well-managed company. They laid out a much clearer vision for Wall Street of its strategy, where it's headed. As they say, they're going after IT complexity. I want to make a comment on this. You think about Legacy EMC. Legacy EMC was not the company that you would expect to deal with complexity. In fact, they were the culprit of complexity. One of the things that Jeff Clarke did when he came in, he said, this portfolio's too complex, needs to be simplified. Joe Tucci used to say, overlap is better than gaps. Jeff Clarke said we got too much overlap. We don't have a lot of gaps so let's streamline that portfolio. Taking advantage of vendor consolidation, this is an interesting one. Ever since I've been in this business, which has been quite a long time now, I've been hearing that buyers want to consolidate the number of vendors that they have. They've really not succeeded in doing that. Now can they do that now 'cause there are less vendors? Well, in a sense, yes, there are less sort of on-prem big vendors. EMC's no longer in the market, you don't have companies like Sun and Digital anymore, Compact is gone. HP split in two, but still. You're not seeing a huge number of new vendors, at scale, come into the market. Except you've got AWS and Google as new players there. So I think that injects sort of a new dynamic that a lot of people like to put cloud aside and kind of ignore it and talk about the old on-prem business, but I think that you're going to see a lot of experimentations and workload ins and outs, particularly with AWS and Google and of course Azure, which is in itself, their cloud is almost a separate force. So we'll see how that shakes up. As I say, servers right now, Dell's got a very tough compare. I think Dell will be fine in the server space. Storage, it's all about simplifying the portfolio, they've got a refreshed portfolio focused on regaining share. They've rebranded everything Power, so their whole line is going to be Power by, if it's not already, by May of next year, Dell Technologies World. It's a much more scalable portfolio. And I think Dell's got a lot of valuation levers. They're a $92 billion company, they've got their current operations, their current P and L, their share gains, their cross-company synergies, particularly with VMware, they can expand their TAM into cloud with partnerships like they're doing with AWS and others, Google, Microsoft. The Edge is a TAM expansion opportunity to them. And also corporate structure. You've seen them. VMware acquired Pivotal. They're cleaning that up. I'm sure they could potentially make some other moves. Secureworks is out there, for example. Maybe they'll do some things with RSA. So they got that knob to turn and they can delever. Paying down the debt to the extent that they can get back to investment grade, that will lower their interest rates, that'll drop right to the bottom line, and they'll be able to reinvest that. And Tom Sweet said, within 18 months, we'll be able to get there with that two X ratio relative to EBITA, and that's when they're going to start having conversations with the rating agencies to talk about you know, hey, maybe we can get a better rating and lower our interest expense. Bottom line, did Wall Street buy the story? Yes. But I don't think it's going to necessarily change anything in the near term. This is a show me from Missouri, prove it, execute, and then I think Dell will get rewarded. Okay, so this is Dave Vellante, thanks for watching this Cube Insights powered by ETR. We'll see ya next time. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
From the SiliconANGLE Media Office And at the same time, VMware has to walk the fine line
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff Clarke | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Williams | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Sweet | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fujitsu | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Dave Donatelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Western Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Alex | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
October '18 | DATE | 0.99+ |
4,500 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
April '19 | DATE | 0.99+ |
4,500 practitioners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Legacy EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
17 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$92 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sun | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July '19 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
July | DATE | 0.99+ |
Joe Tucci | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Iron Mountain | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Veritas | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
HitachiHDS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dropbox | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
88 products | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave McCann, AWS | AWS re:Inforce 2019
>> live from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the Cube covering AWS reinforce 2019. Brought to you by Amazon Web service is and its ecosystem partners. >> Okay, welcome back. It was two cubes. Live coverage in Boston, Massachusetts, for Amazon Web services reinforces A W s, his first inaugural conference around security, cloud security and all the benefits of security vendors of bringing. We're here with a man who runs the marketplace and more. Dave McCann Cube, alumni vice president of migration, marketplace and control surfaces. That's a new tail you were that you have here since the last time we talked. Lots changed. Give us the update. Welcome to the Cube. >> Great to be back, ma'am. Believe it's seven months of every event. >> Feels like this. Seven years. You know, you've got a lot new things happening. >> We do >> explain. You have new responsibility. You got the marketplace, which we talked about a great product solutions. What else do you have? >> So we've obviously been expanding our service portfolio, right? So either us is launching. New service is all the time. We have a set of service is a road in the migration of software. So I run. No, the immigration Service's team and interesting. We were sitting in Boston, and that's actually headquartered 800 yards down the road. So there's a set of surfaces around the tools to help you as a CEO. Move your applications onto the clothes. Marketplace is obviously where we want you to find short where you need to buy. And then once you get into the topic of governance, we had one product called Service Catalog and reinvent. We announced a new product. That was a preview called Control. Yesterday we went to G A full availability off control, Terror and Control term service catalog together are in the government space, but we're calling them control service is because it's around controlling the access off teams to particular resources. So that's control service. >> What people moving into the cloud and give us a sense of the the workload. I know you see everything but any patterns that you can see a >> lot of patterns and merging and migration, and they are very industry specific. But there are some common patterns, so you know we're doing migrations and frozen companies were weighed and professional service is run by. Todd Weatherby is engaged in hundreds of those migrations. But we also have no over 70 partners that we've certified of migration partners. Migration partners are doing three times as many migrations as our old professional service is. Team are doing so in collection. There's a lot going on there, one of the common patterns. First of all, everybody is moved a Web development other websites have done. They're all running on the AWS know what they're doing is they're modernizing new applications. So the building in Europe or bring enough over moving onto containers. So it was a lie that ran on a sever server on. As they move into the clothes, they're gonna reshape the throw away. Some of the court brief the court up into micro service is on. Deploy out, Let's see on E. C s, which is continuing. There's a lot of application organization, and then on the migration side, we're seeing applications clearly were migrating a lost a lot of ASAP. So the big partners like Deloitte and Accenture are doing a C P migrations, and we've done a lot of ASAP migrations. And then there are other business applications are being moved with particular software vendors. You know there's a company here in Boston called Pegasystems. They do a world leading workflow platform. We've worked with Pagan, and we have migrated loss of paga warped floors in dozens of paying customers up on the float. >> You innovated on the marketplace, which is where people buy so they can contract with software. So now you got moving to the cloud, buying on the cloud, consuming the cloud and then governing it and managing that aspect all under one cohesive unit. That's you. Is that good? >> Yeah, it's a good way to think about it. It's a san of engineering teams with Coleman purpose for the customer. So you know, one of the things we do AWS is we innovate a lot, and then we organize the engineering teams around a common customer needs. So we said, above all of the computer stories service is on. We pay attention to the application layer. We described the application, So if you think of a migration service is says, I've actually got a service called Discovery, I crawl over your servers and I find what you have way. Then what we do is we have a tool that says, Are you gonna bring and move the till. So you have to build a business case. We just bought a company in Canada called TSA Logic. They had a Super Two for building a business case that said, what would this absolutely running with either of us. >> So is the need of the business case. What's the courtney that you guys have focused on? What was that? >> So, interestingly, we run more Windows Server and the clothes when Microsoft. So you actually have to business keys here. So many windows servers are running on print. What does it look like when a run on either the U. S. And T s so logic? Really good, too. And we find our customers using it. That says, Here's your own prim Windows server configuration with an app on run the mortal What would it look like when it runs on AWS? >> But why would you just do that with a spreadsheet? What? What is the T s so logic do that you couldn't do especially >> well? First of all, you want to make a simple too Somebody has to go run a spreadsheet. They've turned it into a tool that a business years Ercan used a sales person you could use on. They've built on top of a database. So it's got a rich set of choices. You are richer than you put in. A special with a U IE is intuitive, and you're gonna learn it in 20 minutes. I'm not gonna have you made up >> this date in their best practice things like that that you can draw a library >> of what's going down, and it keeps the data store of all the ones we've done. So we're turning that into two. Were giving Old Toller solution architect. >> Well, you got a good thing going on with the marketplace. Good to see you wrapping around those needs there. I gotta ask for the marketplace. Just give us the latest stats. How many subscriptions air in the marketplace these days? What's the overall number in the marketplace? It's >> pretty exciting. Way decided just at San Francisco to announce that we now have over 1,000,000 active subscriptions in the marketplace, which is a main boggling number on its own 1,000,000 subscriptions. Ice of Scrape. Within those subscriptions, we've got over 240 foes and active accounts, you know, and the audience doors you could be an enterprise with 100 cases and in an enterprise. What we typically see is that there are seven or eight teams that are buying or using software, so we'll have seven or eight accounts that have the right to subscribe. So you could be a one team and you're in another team you're buying B I tools. You're buying security tools. So those accounts on what? We're announcing the show for the first time ever. Its security is we have over 100,000 security subscriptions. That's a while. That's a big number. Some companies only have 100 customers, and the market, please. Our customers are switched on 100,000 security. So >> many product listings is that roughly it's just security security. At 300 >> there's over 100 listings. Thing is a product with a price okay on a vendor could be Let's see Paolo off networks or crowdstrike or trains or semantic or McAfee or a brand new company like Twist located of Israel. These companies might have one offer or 20 offers, so we have over 800 offers from over 300. Vendors were having new vendors every week. >> That's the next question. How many security app developers are eyes? Do you have over 300? 300? Okay. About 100. Anyway, I heard >> this morning from Gartner that they believe that are over 1000 security vendors. So I'm only 30% done. I got a little work >> tonight. How >> do you >> govern all this stuff? I was a customer. Sort of Make sure that they're in compliance. >> Great question. Steven Smith yesterday was talking about governance once she moved things on the clothes. It's very elastic. You could be running it today, not running a tomato, running it in I d running in Sydney. So it's easy to fire up running everywhere. So how did the governance team of a company nor watch running where you know, you get into tagging, everything has to be tagged. Everything has to have a cord attached to it. And then you do want to control who gets to use what I may have bought about a cuter appliance. But I don't know that I gave you rates to use it, right, so we could have border on behalf of the company. But I need to grant you access. So we launched a couple of years ago. Service catalog is our first governance to and yesterday we went into full release over new to call the control tower. >> Right. What you announced way reinvents >> preview. And yesterday we went to Jenny. What control does is it Natural Owes me to set up a set of accounts. So if you think of it, your development team, you've got David Kay and tested and the product ain't your brand new to the company. I'm a little worried. What, you're going to get up. You >> don't want to give him the keys to the kingdom, >> so I'm actually going to grant you access to a set of resources, and then I'm gonna apply some rules, or what we call God reels is your brand. You you haven't read my manual, you're in the company. So I'm gonna put a set of God reels on you to make sure that you follow our guide length >> Just training. And so is pressing the wrong button, that kind of thing. So I gotta ask you I mean, on the buying side consumption. I heard you say in a talk upstairs on Monday. You have a buyer, buyer, lead, engineering teams and cellar Let engineering, which tells me that you got a lot of innovation going on the marketplace. So the results are obviously they mention the listings. But one of the trends that's here security conference and it was proper is ecosystems importance in monetization. So back in the old days, Channel partners were a big part of the old computer industry. You're essentially going direct with service listings, which is great. How does that help the channel? Is there sinking around channel as a buyer opportunity? How do you How does that work with the market? Is what your thinking around the relationship between the scale of a simplicity and efficiency, the marketplace with the relationships the channel partners may have with their customers? And how do you bridge that together? What's the thinking >> you've overstayed? Been around a long time? >> Uh, so you have 90 Sydney? Well, the channels have been modernizes the nineties. You think about a >> long time. It's really interesting when we conceived Market please candidly. Way didn't put the channel in marketplace, and in retrospect, that was a miss. Our customers are big customers or small customers. Trust some of the resellers. Some resellers operates surely on price. Some resellers bring a lot of knowledge, even the biggest of the global 2000 Fortune 100. They have a prepared advisor. Let's take a company record. You often got 700 security engineers that are blue chip companies in America trusts or they buy the software the adoptive recommends. So mark it, please really didn't accommodate for Let's Pick another One in Europe, it would be computer center. So in the last two years we've dedicated the data separate engineering team were actually opened up. A team in a different city on their sole customer is a reseller. And so we launch this thing called Consulting Partner Private offer. And so now you're Palo. Also, for your trained, you can authorize active or serious or s h I to be the re sailor at this corporation, and they can actually negotiate the price, which is what a role resellers do. They negotiate price in terms, so we've actually true reseller >> write software for fulfillment through the marketplace. Four partners which are now customers to you now so that they could wrap service is because that's something we talk to. People in the Channel number one conversation is we love the cloud. But how do I make money and that is Service is right. They all want to wrap Service's around, So okay, you guys are delivering this. Is that my getting that right? You guys are riding a direct link in tow marketplace for partners, and they could wrap service is around there, >> will you? Seeing two things? First of all, yes. We're lowering the resale of to sell the software for absolutely. So you re sailor, you can quote software you build rebuild for you so that I become the billing partner for a serious or a billing partner for active on active can use marketplace to fulfill clothes software for their customers. Dan Burns to see you about pretty happy. You crossed the line into a second scenario, which is condone burns attached. Service is on. Clearly, that's a use case we hear usually would we hear use cases way end up through feeling that a little, little not a use case I have enabled, but we've done >> what you're working on It. We've had what the customer. How does the reseller get into the marketplace? What kind of requirements are there. Is it? Is it different than some of your other partners, or is it sort of a similar framework? >> They have to become an approved resale or so First of all, they have to be in a peon partner. I mean, we work tightly with a p N e p M screens partners for AWS. So Josh Hoffman's team Terry Wise, his team, whole part of team screen. The reseller we would only work with resellers are screened and approved by the PM Wants the AP en approved way have no set up a dedicated program team. They work with a reseller with trained them what's involved. Ultimately, however, the relationship is between Splunk in a tree sailor, a five and a three sailor named after a tree sailor or Paulo trend or Croat straight. So it's up to the I S V to tail us that hey, computer centers my reseller. I don't control that relationship. A fulfillment agent you crow strike to save resellers, and I simply have to meet that work so that I get the end customer happy. >> So your enabler in that instance, that's really no, I'm >> really an engine, even team for everybody engineer for the Iast way, engineer for the buyer. And they have to engineer for the re. So >> you have your hands in a lot of the action because you're in the middle of all this marketplace and you must do a lot of planning. I gotta ask you the question and this comes up. That kind of put on my learning all the Amazon lingo covering reinvent for eight years and covering all the different events. So you gotta raise the bar, which is an internal. You keep innovating. Andy Jassy always sucks about removing the undifferentiated heavy lifting. So what is the undifferentiated heavy lifting that you're working toe automate for your customers? >> Great questions. Right now there's probably three. We'll see what the buyer friction is, and then we'll talk about what the sale of friction is. The buyer frustration that is, undifferentiated. Heavy lifting is the interestingly, it's the team process around choosing software. So a couple of customers were on stage yesterday right on those big institutions talked about security software. But in order for an institution to buy that software, there are five groups involved. Security director is choosing the vendor, but procurement has to be involved. Andre. No procurement. We can't be left out the bit. So yesterday we did. The integration to Cooper is a procurement system. So that friction is by subscribing marketplace tied round. Match it with appeal because the p O is what goes on the ledgers with the company. A purchase order. So that has to be a match in purchase order for the marketplace subscription. And then engineers don't Tidwell engineers to always remember you didn't tag it. Hi, this finance nowhere being spent. So we're doing work on working service catalog to do more tagging. And so the buyer wants good tagging procurement integrated. So we're working on a walk slow between marketplace service catalog for procurement. >> Tiring. So you've kind of eliminated procurement or are eliminating procurement as a potential blocker, they use another. Actually, we won't be >> apart for leading procurement. VPs want their V piece of engineering to be happy. >> This is legal. Next. Actually, Greek question. We actually tackled >> legal. First, we did something called Enterprise Code tracked and our customer advisory board Two years ago, one of our buyers, one of our customers, said we're gonna be 100 vendors to deploy it. We're not doing 100 tracks. We've only got one lawyer, You know, 6000 engineers and one lawyer. Well, lawyers, good cord is quickly. So we've created a standard contract. It take stain to persuade legal cause at risk. So we've got a whole bunch of corporations adopting enterprise contract, and we're up to over 75 companies adopting enterprise contract. But legal is apartment >> so modernizing the procurement, a key goal >> procurement, legal, security, engineering. And then the next one is I t finance. So if you think of our budgets on their course teams on AWS, everything needs to be can become visible in either of US budgets. And everything has become visible in course exporter. So we have to call the rate tags. >> I heard a stat that 6,000,000 After moving to the cloud in the next 6,000,000 3 to 5 years, security as a focus reinforces not a summit. It's branded as a W s reinforce, just like reinvents. Same kind of five year for security. What's your impression of the show so far? No, you've been highly active speaking, doing briefing started a customer's burn, the midnight oil with partners and customers What's that? What's your vibe of the show? What's your takeaway? What's the most important thing happening here? What's your what's your summary? >> So I always think you get the truth in the booth. Cut to the chase. I made a customer last night from a major media company who we all know who's in Los Angeles. His comment was weeks, either. These expectations wasn't she wanted to come because he goes to reinvent. Why am I coming to Boston in June? Because I'm gonna go to reinvent November on this. The rates of security for a major media company last night basically said, I love the love. The subject matter, right? It's so security centric. He actually ended up bringing a bunch of people from his team on, and he loves the topics in the stations. The other thing he loved was everybody. Here is insecurity, reinvent. There's lots of people from what's the functions, But everybody here is a security professional. So that was the director of security for a media company. He was at an event talking to one of the suppliers, the marketplace. I asked this president of a very well known security vendor and I said. So what's your reaction to reinforce? And he said, Frankly, when you guys told me it was coming, we didn't really want the bother. It's the end of the quarter. It's a busy time of year. It's another event, he said. I am sure glad we came on. He was standing talking to these VP of marketing, saying, We want to bring more people, make sure, So he's overjoyed. His His comment was, when I go to Rio event 50,000 people but only 5% of their own security. I can't reinforce everybody's insecurity >> in Houston in 2020. Any inside US tow? Why Houston? I have no clue what I actually think >> is really smart about the Vineyard, and this is what a customer said Last night. I met a customer from Connecticut who isn't a load to travel far. They don't get to go to reinvent in Vegas. I think what we did when we came to Boston way tapped into all the states that could drive. So there are people here who don't get to go to reinvent. I think when we go to Houston, we're going to get a whole bunch of takes its customers. Yeah, you don't get a flight to Vegas. So I think it's really good for the customer that people who don't get budget to travel >> makes sense on dry kind of a geographic beograd. The world >> if we're expanding the customers that can learn. So from an education point of view, we're just increase the audience that we're teaching. Great, >> Dave. Great to have you on. Thanks for the insights and congratulations on the new responsibility as you get more coz and around marketplace been very successful. 1,000,000 subscriptions. That's good stuff again. They were >> you reinvented and >> a couple of months, Seven days? What? We're excited. I love covering the growth of the clouds. Certainly cloud security of his own conference. Dave McCann, Vice president Marketplace Migration and Control Service is controlled cattle up. How they how you how you move contract and governed applications in the future. All gonna be happening online. Cloud Mr. Q coverage from Boston. They just reinforced. We right back with more after this short break
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Amazon Web service is That's a new tail you were that you have here since the last time we talked. Great to be back, ma'am. You know, you've got a lot new things happening. You got the marketplace, which we talked about a great product it's around controlling the access off teams to particular resources. I know you see everything but any patterns that you can see a So the building in Europe So now you got moving to the cloud, buying on the cloud, consuming the cloud and then governing it and We described the application, So if you think of a migration service is says, So is the need of the business case. So you actually have to business keys here. First of all, you want to make a simple too Somebody has to go run a spreadsheet. So we're turning that into Good to see you wrapping around those needs there. and the audience doors you could be an enterprise with 100 cases and many product listings is that roughly it's just security security. These companies might have one offer or 20 offers, so we have over 800 offers from That's the next question. So I'm only 30% done. How Sort of Make sure that they're in compliance. So how did the governance team of a company nor watch running where you What you announced way reinvents So if you think of it, your development team, So I'm gonna put a set of God reels on you to make sure that you follow our guide So back in the old days, Well, the channels have been modernizes the nineties. So in the last two years we've dedicated the data They all want to wrap Service's around, So okay, you guys are delivering this. So you re sailor, you can quote software you How does the reseller get into the marketplace? the PM Wants the AP en approved way have no set up a dedicated program team. really an engine, even team for everybody engineer for the Iast way, So you gotta raise the bar, which is an internal. So that has to be a match in purchase order for the marketplace subscription. So you've kind of eliminated procurement or are eliminating procurement as a potential blocker, apart for leading procurement. This is legal. So we've got a whole bunch of corporations adopting enterprise contract, So if you think of our budgets I heard a stat that 6,000,000 After moving to the cloud in the next 6,000,000 3 to 5 years, security as a So I always think you get the truth in the booth. I have no is really smart about the Vineyard, and this is what a customer said Last night. The world So from an education point Thanks for the insights and congratulations on the new responsibility as you get more I love covering the growth of the clouds.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Deloitte | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Steven Smith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave McCann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Terry Wise | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 offers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Houston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Josh Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sydney | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Israel | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dan Burns | PERSON | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
David Kay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Connecticut | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
five groups | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
6,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one lawyer | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 tracks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 cases | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
6000 engineers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Los Angeles | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one offer | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Todd Weatherby | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
November | DATE | 0.99+ |
eight years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Seven years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Twist | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100 vendors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight teams | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
McAfee | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
TSA Logic | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Four partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one team | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
800 yards | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second scenario | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave McCann Cube | PERSON | 0.99+ |
over 800 offers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Windows | TITLE | 0.99+ |
5 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last night | DATE | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tonight | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last night | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rio | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
two cubes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
1,000,000 subscriptions | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Howie Xu, Zscaler | CUBEconversation, May 2019
(upbeat jazz music) >> From our studios, in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California. This is a CUBEConversation. >> Hello everyone, welcome to this special CUBEConversation. I'm John Furrier in theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto, California. We're excited to have a great tech talk here with good friend Howie Xu, who's currently the Vice President of Machine Learning and AI at Zscaler. Formally an entrepreneur, which he sold his company Zscaler. Before that entrepreneur resident Greylock. Before that VMWare, a variety of other endeavors. Howie and I, we've known each other for a while. Great to have you come in and chat about-- >> Great to be here! >> The Zoom, Zscaler, these are the new breed modern era companies, SaaS business models. Really interesting and this is something that we were talking about on email and over text, is our topic. >> Yeah. >> Thanks for coming in. >> Great. >> So you've seen the waves at VMWare, you saw the rapid growth there. And now, you work for Zscaler which is experiencing rapid growth. You saw Zoom go public, and I just interviewed Michael Dell. We were commenting about that on text as well. He said these big markets that have big total addressable dollars associated with them are ripe for disruption. They used to have high barriers to entry in the old ways to look at it, but now with cloud and with SaaS, with data, there's different innovation speeds. This has become a big deal. Talk about your view on this. >> Well to me, when Zoom and then Zscaler founded, many years ago, no one believed that they would become this big, right? When Zoom founded, they were plenty of the conference, free even, software available out there. When Jay founded Zscaler people thought, "Well, there was enough security companies, security solutions." Clearly, they defied conventional wisdom and then they just fought on and they saw something that other people didn't see which is precisely what you were talking about. The SaaS is so different, right? The business model, the innovation speed, the data driven kind of the thing, it's so different. A lot of people say, "Hey what's the difference "between SaaS versus the convention? "Isn't that just moving that thing over to the cloud?" I actually used to think that way too, right? Isn't that just the virtual price, moving on to Amazon Cloud? After living and breathing in SaaS company and then also observing that in the VC industry as well. It's just totally different, day and night different. >> Well I wanted to get into this with you 'cause I think you bring some good perspective onto these insights and to the rocket success of say Zoom and Zscaler, but Zoom in particular, recent successful IPO. Among the recent class this past quarter. Zoom, Lyft, Uber. Zoom is standing out. They're getting profitable. This is video conferencing. You know in the old days if someone said, "Hey, I want to compete with video conferences." Well, the barriers are actually too high, but they took a very innovative approach. Cloud, data, simplicity, and the big 800 pound gorilla was the WebEx's of the world. Who was defined, divine for sharing slides, not so much pure video. (laughing) >> Yeah. >> They really innovated the focus, the speed of success. Unprecedented, in my opinion. I think this is a huge success of what the opportunities are for entrepreneurs. >> Yeah, I think on the surface, right? If you ask Eric he would tell you that, look the WebEx was designed for sharing slides, and then the Zoom was designed from ground up for video sharing, or the video conferencing, so it's very different and it requires different architecture. So that's very true. But I think there is a more fundamental to that. The more fundamental for that is, there are a few things. One is the product, the life cycle is very different. How do you approach the customer? The release cycle, the sort of the feedback loop, right? Much tighter feedback loop, much faster feedback loop between the customer and you. The release cost is much lower now as a SaaS product. So, innovation is just accelerated because it's SaaS, because it's a true SaaS. >> And this is a unique thing, you said before, SaaS isn't just lifting a on-premises workload and moving it to the cloud. It's a completely different mindset. Talk about this dynamic, because it affords new kinds of risk taking. You and I were talking about before we came on camera, share your insight on that. >> Well, you know, as kind of the traditional software you have a release cycle, you want it to have a release date, right? And then once the product is in customer hand, if you have a bug, if you have something, it's so costly to change it, right? But as a SaaS, the form factor, you can take a little bit more risk. You can even give that feature set to 10% of your audience. Not the entire set of the audience. You can do those kind of magic, so you can accelerate the innovation and as a shrink-wrapped software the traditional way. You have one shot, if that software is not good, then you are toast. >> So you can move quicker. You can push code, you don't have the on-premise dynamics. >> Yeah, the innovation and then risk taking are kind of correlated, right? Relatively more risk, the more you are willing to take risk, relatively you can take more innovation. So, that's the thing. >> Well, you and I were talking, and one of the key things that you have been talking about publicly, and amongst friends, is innovation speed. Everyone wants the innovation fever. "I got to win to innovate, digital transformation, rah rah." Easier said then done. Innovation speed is critical with cloud and SaaS, why? What's the formula there for innovation speed? >> Well, one thing we discussed, the release cycle. For a, not necessarily for Zoom and Zscaler, but you know for SaaS in general, its possible for you to have daily, weekly, monthly release. Traditional software, there is no way you can do that but that's just the release cycles of that. The other thing is, you can actually take a risk. You can say, "Hey I want you to try to raise 1% of the customer and then see how they are going to react to this." But in the traditional way you have product manager debating for six months, six years on whether or how to do things. Here, let's not debate, let's just see. >> Let's ship it. >> Right, ship it. >> And Reid Hoffman always says, "If he's not embarrassed by your first shipment then you're not doing it properly." Which begs the question, I want to get your thoughts on this because, again with VMware, you saw how early that worked and their transforming cloud is now here unlike when they started the company. What is the right way to do it? And what's the wrong way to do it? When you look at an entrepreneur or a friend, who's trying to get a business off the ground, SaaS business, when you look at what they're doing, and you look at their mechanisms and how they're organizing their team, their code. What jumps out at you as the wrong way, and what's the right way? >> Well, the, I think the coach is really it, right? You know, the kind of the coach of incremental success and the fast iteration is the culture for a SaaS company, right? For the traditional one, you cannot afford to do that, because once you make a small mistake, you are toast. So I think, you know, that the culture difference, you really want it to have faster iteration basically. >> And that also comes down to the team, the people, right? >> Yes. >> The people selection. >> Yes, if you are kind of used to the waterfall thing, it's pretty hard to adapt to this kind of the SaaS world. >> And what's your advice to entrepreneurs? Reset, because if you say speed is of the essence, resetting is probably something that's not hard to do, then. >> Well, I wouldn't say easy, but not easy-- >> I hate to use the word pivot, but you know, resetting means okay, stop, rebuild. >> I think one way to think about it is actually looking at it and how to build enterprise software, like the consumer sort of product way, right? If you think of Facebook or Google, the traditional Google, of course Google now has enterprise product, but the traditional sort of, the Google, Facebook, kind of the product, it's more for consumers to consume. I mean they are fast iterations. How often? What's the criteria to release a product? Enterprise product is getting towards there. You need that kind of the thing, so, if you don't know how to do it look at a Facebook, how Facebook, of course Facebook and YouTube pulled the other way around, they need to care more about the privacy, care about more stability. So I think you are seeing the the two sides of the world, the enterprise side and the consumer side. They are learning from each other. >> Well, I want to get to the enterprise talk track in a second, because I think you can give a lot of insight, so I want to stay on SaaS cloud native or cloud specifically, 'cause that's where SaaS really shines when you're really talking about cloud scale. Data, you're doing AI now, and you and I have both talked about data many times. >> Yes. >> You know I'm a data hardcore person. I love data. I think software and data, I wrote a blog post in 2007, that says data is the new developer kit. The word "developer kit" was used back then. You're now seeing where data is part of the developer's piece of their value creation. Highly addressable, available, usable, not stored in some silo unaddressable, high latency to get it. How important is the data for the SaaS piece? Because that's where to make these kind of changes you're talking about, you need the data, data's giving you insights, that's something that's near and dear to your heart. Explain your vision of the role of data. >> Yeah, I think, you touched up on it. If you want to make sense out of something, you need the data, right? And if it's not SaaS, I would go, maybe a more extreme way, but it's not clear to me the data's even useful to you 'cause you know the data may be for some large software company, they may have hundreds of thousands of customers out there, but the data is spread around. I mean how are you going to train a model with all the data spread around hundreds of thousands of locations? So the real, the correct, or the optimal way, is actually the SaaS model, you actually have the data with you and then you kind of leverage the data. So I would say this is actually another benefit of the SaaS, why SaaS is going to change the world or eat the world. It owns the data for real, right? The data may be not the private data, but it's actually could be a behavior data. How people are reacting to your features. From VMware days we wanted to know, is people even using this feature? How often people use this feature? You know people are always debating, "Hey what's the maximum policy we need to give this and that?" But in the SaaS world, no debate just look at it. We always say, "Don't listen to what customers are wanting you to do." But watch how they do things, so that you can sort of understand, what product you want to develop, right? Here you actually can really watch how customers using your product. Don't listen to them, if you listen to them you will give them a faster horse as we all knew. >> But what's important about the data discussion, because, a security person would say, "Hey if you put into one spot, I can hack it." But, it's not just people's names, it's other data. It's gesture data, it's usage data, so you're not talking about sign in data, it's data. >> It could be the behavior, it could be second order data. Do people use my product, that's my data. That's something I wanted to know, I'm not necessarily talking about peeking into people's email, no. It's actually the thing surrounding it. >> It's looking for the good things in the data. All right, let's talk about the customer alignment and customer expectations, you know customer user experience is driven by customer's expectations usually, right? As expectations change. And I think the Zoom thing jumped out at me, the Zoom IPO and their great success and were a customer as well, is that they really nailed the expectation of the user and cloud certainly helped them get that speed, but this is a key thing, if you could just deliver a great experience. >> Yeah. >> For those customers, you can actually win big part of the market. >> Yeah, if you Google, Eric. Eric doesn't speak to me as much, but if you Google Eric. >> We'll get him on theCUBE. >> What's sort of the jump? Hopefully I can help you to bring him here too. But what's going to be obvious if you Google search Eric he is sort of the notion of customer successes, my success. If customer is happy, I'm going to happy. So, my happiness hinges on the customer's happiness. So that's, kind of very important because only the SaaS model made that more natural. In traditional model, whether traditional on prime or we're not, you sort of celebrate when you have customer signing your PO and then you don't hear from the sales guy or three years, the sales guy may move on to another company, you don't know, right? But for the SaaS, it doesn't stop when sign the PO. You actually have to earn customers' happiness every single day. >> Adoption's critical. >> Yeah, customer success is important and then that's kind of the, so there is a huge alignment, very interesting alignment between customer's happiness, customer success, customer adoption of your product and you're sort of, the success, right? 'Cause you know, when I came to Zscaler, one of our first meeting is about, okay, we had a lot of customer interest us. They sign a PO. How to get them ramp up the actual first use, right? So, that kind of conversation doesn't happen in the traditional software company. You sign a PO. If the customer doesn't use your product for another 18 month which is actually quite normal, no one is going to jump up and say, "This is crazy!" Right? >> You know, we're going to do that on our Part Two, about the impact of the enterprise. But you made up a good point there, I want to just close out our last talk point is, the data driving the experience isn't like the old way of throw in, get the PO and celebrate. You got to, kind of, keep that going. The enterprise is changing and the enterprise has a tsunami of onboarding of new types of developers. In some cases they grow. We just had Cisco inside here on theCUBE this morning. They're turning network guys into programmers from CL command line prompt dudes to gals to coders. You're seeing developers now enter the enterprise to build the apps so there's now a digital transformation initiative for enterprises to be, I guess, SaaS-like. But it's hard. >> Yeah, I think that's, you know, this is part of the digital transformation. Every company, Fortune 500 or Fortune 2000 company need to do it, right? So, another interesting part is, when they do this on this journey of digitalization, you cannot possibly build all the infrastructure yourself. You will have to consume public cloud, you know sometimes private and hybrid cloud, and you are actually going to consume lots of the SaaS, right? Whether Zoom, the Zscaler, or the PagerDuty, I mean you are not going to be all those thing from scratch but you want it to have a very good, sort of the stack on top of it and how you going to take advantage of the SaaS, is a very interesting aspect. >> Well in Part Two of our chat, when we come back on our next discussion, I want to get into the enterprise. But to wrap up Part One here, innovation speed, leveraging data and the beautiful risk taking and benefits of SaaS. Large scale, fast, high value, target and developing an app or a venture. >> Yeah. >> What is your advice to entrepreneurs out there and/or someone who's doing a digital transformation? Where they want to leverage Saas, what's the playbook, what's the starting point, what's your advice? >> Well, there are a number of things. One, there are so many SaaS companies out there taking advantage of them, right? In the old days you have to hire email admins, you have to do this. Nowadays, all the SaaS, that's your kind of, you only need to worry about the business logic, you have some unique insight in the business and then just have, hire programmers to codify that and then the rest will magically happen because of the public cloud, because of the SaaS. So, be very mindful about the new environment you are in, that's number one. The second thing I want to say is, how do you look at AI technology? The older way is program something in a definitive way. I think there will be a limit for that. It has taken the software industry a long way to where we are. But, if you look at the next 20 years, I think a lot of the lift is going to be done by the AI Center. But it's not going to be easy to be done, you have to think about your data strategy, where are you going to have the massive, sustainable, unique, ideally even labeled data. If you don't have the labeled data, you have to have the strategy. How are you going to have some unique model with the data you have? So, the data strategy, right? So, essentially, how to take advantage of the cloud? How to take advantage of the data? And then on top of that you are going to do something that's solving an unmet um-- >> Customer problem. >> Customer problem. >> An acute landing spot in the market place. >> Unmet need. >> In a big market. >> In a big, well, in a big market. >> There it is. >> Even if there is already a mature solution I bet, since those mature solutions would not develop from that native cloud era, and the native AI era. You have plenty of opportunities. >> Howie, you and I are on the same page on this, I have been saying it truly believe we are living in an entrepreneurial era where, with your advice and what you just laid out, the better mousetrap can take down a big market. >> And, I'm hopeful that you will also disrupt the media business, you know we're-- >> Don't tell anyone! (laughing) We're still going to do that top secret of Silent Running. Howie, we're going to get Part Two. We're going to dig Deep into the enterprise, because the enterprise now has an opportunity in the first historic time in tech history, to use tools and technologies to completely reset and re-architect for this kind of capability. >> Absolutely. >> So, we'll hit that in Part Two. >> I'm super passionate about it too. >> Howie Xu, here inside theCUBE. Friend of theCUBE, legend in the industry. Great entrepreneur and technologist here, sharing CUBEConversation. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (upbeat jazz music)
SUMMARY :
in the heart of Silicon Valley, Great to have you come in and chat about-- that we were talking about on email and over text, you saw the rapid growth there. the data driven kind of the thing, it's so different. 'cause I think you bring some good perspective They really innovated the focus, the speed of success. One is the product, the life cycle is very different. And this is a unique thing, you said before, so you can accelerate the innovation You can push code, you don't have the on-premise dynamics. the more you are willing to take risk, that you have been talking about publicly, But in the traditional way you have product manager and you look at their mechanisms For the traditional one, you cannot afford to do that, Yes, if you are kind of used to the waterfall thing, Reset, because if you say speed is of the essence, I hate to use the word pivot, but you know, kind of the product, it's more for consumers to consume. and you and I have both talked How important is the data for the SaaS piece? and then you kind of leverage the data. "Hey if you put into one spot, I can hack it." It's actually the thing surrounding it. if you could just deliver a great experience. For those customers, you can actually but if you Google Eric. and then you don't hear If the customer doesn't use your product The enterprise is changing and the enterprise and you are actually going to consume leveraging data and the beautiful risk taking In the old days you have to hire email admins, in a big market. and the native AI era. Howie, you and I are on the same page on this, in the first historic time in tech history, Friend of theCUBE, legend in the industry.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Howie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
May 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Howie Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Lyft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zoom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
18 month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first shipment | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
800 pound | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one shot | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SaaS | TITLE | 0.97+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first meeting | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Zscaler | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Silent Running | TITLE | 0.96+ |
AI Center | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Part One | OTHER | 0.96+ |
hundreds of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Silicon Valley, | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first use | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Saas | TITLE | 0.94+ |
hundreds of thousands of customers | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Fortune | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
one spot | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
CUBEConversation | EVENT | 0.92+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.91+ |
Part Two | OTHER | 0.91+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Zscaler | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Fortune 500 | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
second order | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
WebEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
PagerDuty | TITLE | 0.88+ |
many years ago | DATE | 0.86+ |
one way | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
prime | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.81+ |
Chris Yeh, Blitzscaling Ventures | CUBEConversation, March 2019
(upbeat music) >> From our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, this is a CUBEConversation. >> Hi everyone, welcome to the special CUBEConversation. We're in Palo Alto, California, at theCUBE studio. I'm John Furrier, co-host of the CUBE. We're here with Chris Yeh. He's the co-founder and general partner of Blitzscaling Ventures, author of the book Blitzscaling with Reid Hoffman, founder of LinkedIn and a variety of other ventures, also a partner at Greylock Partners. Chris, great to see you. I've known you for years. Love the book, love Reid. You guys did a great job. So congratulations. But the big news is you're now a TV star as one of the original inaugural contestants on the Mental Samurai, just premiered on Fox, was it >> On Fox. >> On Fox, nine o'clock, on which days? >> So Mental Samurai is on Fox, Tuesdays at 9 p.m. right after Master Chef Junior. >> Alright. So big thing. So successful shows. Take us through the journey. >> Yeah. >> It's a new show, so it's got this kind of like Jeopardy vibe where they got to answer tough questions in what looks like a roller coaster kind of arm that moves you around from station to station, kind of jar you up. But it's a lot of pressure, time clock and hard questions. Tell us about the format. How you got that. Gives all the story. >> So the story behind Mental Samurai is it's from the producers of American Ninja Warrior, if you've ever seen that show. So American Ninja Warrior is a physical obstacle course and these incredible athletes go through and the key is to get through the obstacle course. If you miss any of the obstacles, you're out. So they took that and they translated it to the mental world and they said, okay, we're going to have a mental obstacle course where you going to have different kinds of questions. So they have memory questions, sequence questions, knowledge questions, all these things that are tapping different elements of intelligence. And in order to win at the game, you have to get 12 questions right in five minutes or less. And you can't get a single question wrong. You have to be perfect. >> And they do try to jar you up, to kind of scrabble your brain with those devices, it makes it suspenseful. In watching last night at your watch party in Palo Alto, it's fun to watch because yeah, I'm like, okay, it's going to be cool. I'll support Chris. I'll go there, be great and on TV, and oh my, that's pretty interesting. It was actually riveting. Intense. >> Yeah. You have that element of moving around from station to station and it's dramatic. It's kind of a theater presence. But what's it like in there? Give us some insight. You're coming on in April 30th so you're yet to come on. >> Yes. >> But the early contestants, none of them made it to the 100,000. Only one person passed the first threshold. >> Right >> Take us through the format. How many thresholds are there? What's the format? >> Perfect, so basically when a competitor gets strapped into the chair, they call it Ava, it's like a robot, and basically they got it from some company in Germany and it has the ability to move 360 degrees. It's like an industrial robot or something. It makes you feel like you're an astronaut or in one those centrifugal force things. And the idea is they're adding to the pressure. They're making it more of a challenge. Instead of just Jeopardy where you're sitting there, and answering questions and bantering with Alex Trebek, you're working against the clock and you're being thrown around by this robot. So what happens is first you try to answer 12 questions correctly in less than five minutes. If you do that, then you make it through to the next round, what they call the circle of samurai and you win $10,000. The circle of samurai, what happens is there are four questions and you get 90 seconds plus whatever you have left over from your first run, to answer those four questions. Answer all four questions correctly, you win $100,000 and the official title of Mental Samurai. >> So there's only two levels, circle of samurai but it gets harder. Now also I noticed that it's, their questions have certain puzzles and there's certain kinds of questions. What's the categories, if you will, what's the categories they offer? >> Yes, so the different categories are knowledge, which is just classic trivia, it's a kind of Jeopardy stuff. There's memory, where they have something on screen that you have to memorize, or maybe they play an audio track that you have to remember what happened. And then there's also sequence where you have to put things in order. So all these different things are represented by these different towers which are these gigantic television screens where they present the questions. And the idea is in order to be truly intelligent, you have to be able to handle all of these different things. You can't just have knowledge. You can't just have pop culture. You got to have everything. >> So on the candidates I saw some from Stanford. >> Yeah. >> I saw an athlete. It's a lot of diversity in candidates. How do they pick the candidates? How did you get involved? Did your phone ring up one day? Were you identified, they've read your blog. Obviously they've, you're smart. I've read your stuff on Facebook. How did you get in there? (laughs) >> Excellent question. So the whole process, there's a giant casting department that does all these things. And there's people who just cast people for game shows. And what happened with me is many years ago back in 2014, my sister worked in Hollywood when I was growing up. She worked for ER and Baywatch and other companies and she still keeps track of the entertainment industry. And she sent me an email saying, hey, here's a casting call for a new show for smart people and you should sign up. And so I replied to the email and said hey I'm Chris Yeh. I'm this author. I graduate from Stanford when I was 19, blah blah blah blah. I should be on your show. And they did a bunch of auditions with me over the phone. And they said we love you, the network loves you. We'll get in touch and then I never heard. Turns out that show never got the green light. And they never even shot that show. But that put me on a list with these various casting directors. And for this show it turns out that there was an executive producer of the show, the creator of the show, his niece was the casting director who interviewed me back in 2014. And she told her uncle, hey, there's this guy, Chris Yeh, in Palo Alto. I think would be great for this new show you're doing. Why don't you reach out to him. So they reached out to me. I did a bunch of Skype auditions. And eventually while I was on my book tour for Blitzscaling, I got the email saying, congratulations, you're part of the season one cast. >> And on the Skype interviews, was it they grilling you with questions, or was it doing a mock dry run? What was some of interview vetting questions? >> So they start off by just asking you about yourself and having you talk about who you are because the secret to these shows is none of the competitors are famous in advance, or at least very few of them are. There was a guy who was a major league baseball pitcher, there's a guy who's an astronaut, I mean, those guys are kind of famous already, but the whole point is, they want to build a story around the person like they do with the Olympics so that people care whether they succeed or not. And so they start off with biographical questions and then they proceed to basically use flash cards to simulate the game and see how well you do. >> Got it, so they want to basically get the whole story arc 'cause Chris, obviously Chris is smart, he passed the test. Graduate when he's 19. Okay, you're book smart. Can you handle the pressure? If you do get it, there's your story line. So they kind of look from the classic, kind of marketing segmentation, demographics is your storylines. What are some of the things that they said to you on the feedback? Was there any feedback, like you're perfect, we like this about you. Or is it more just cut and dry. >> Well I think they said, we love your energy. It's coming through very strongly to the screen. That's fantastic. We like your story. Probably the part I struggle the most with, was they said hey, you know, talk to us about adversity. Talk to us about the challenges that you've overcome. And I tell people, listen, I'm a very lucky guy. A lot of great things have happened to me in life. I don't know if there's that much adversity that I can really complain about. Other people who deal with these life threatening illnesses and all this stuff, I don't have that. And so that was probably the part I struggled the most with. >> Well you're certainly impressive. I've known you for years. You're a great investor, a great person. And a great part of Silicon Valley. So congratulations, good luck on the show. So it's Tuesdays. >> 9 p.m. >> 9 p.m. >> On fox. >> On Fox. Mental Samurai. Congratulations, great. Great to be at the launch party last night. The watch party, there'll be another one. Now your episode comes out on April 30th. >> Yes. So on April 30th we will have a big Bay area-wide watch party. I'm assuming that admission will be free, assuming I find the right sponsors. And so I'll come back to you. I'll let you know where it's going to be. Maybe we should even film the party. >> That's, well, I got one more question on the show. >> Yeah. >> You have not been yet on air so but you know the result. What was it like sitting in the chair, I mean, what was it personally like for you? I mean you've taken tests, you've been involved with the situation. You've made some investments. There's probably been some tough term sheets here and there, board meetings. And all that experience in your life, what was it compared to, what was it like? >> Well, it's a really huge adrenaline rush because if you think about there's so many different elements that already make it an adrenaline rush and they all combine together. First of all, you're in this giant studio which looks like something out of a space-age set with this giant robotic arm. There's hundreds of people around cheering. Then you're strapped into a robotic arm which basically makes you feel like an astronaut, like every run starts with you facing straight up, right? Lying back as if you're about to be launched on a rocket. And then you're answering these difficult questions with time pressure and then there's Rob Lowe there as well that you're having a conversation with. So all these things together, and your heart, at least for me, my heart was pounding. I was like trying very hard to stay calm because I knew it was important to stay clam, to be able to get through it. >> Get that recall, alright. Chris, great stuff. Okay, Blitzscaling. Blitzscaling Ventures. Very successful concept. I remember when you guys first started doing this at Stanford, you and Reid, were doing the lectures at Stanford Business School. And I'm like, I love this. It's on YouTube, kind of an open project initially, wasn't really, wasn't really meant to be a book. It was more of gift, paying it forward. Now it's a book. A lot of great praise. Some criticism from some folks but in general it's about scaling ventures, kind of the Silicon Valley way which is the rocket ship I call. The rocket ship ventures. There's still the other venture capitals. But great book. Feedback from the book and the original days at Stanford. Talk about the Blitzscaling journey. >> And one of the things that happened when we did the class at Stanford is we had all these amazing guests come in and speak. So people like Eric Schmidt. People like Diane Greene. People like Brian Chesky, who talked about their experiences. And all of those conversations really formed a key part of the raw material that went into the book. We began to see patterns emerge. Some pretty fascinating patterns. Things like, for example, a lot of companies, the ones that'd done the best job of maintaining their culture, have their founders involved in hiring for the first 500 employees. That was like a magic number that came up over and over again in the interviews. So all this content basically came forward and we said, okay, well how do we now take this and put it into a systematic framework. So the idea of the book was to compress down 40 hours of video content, incredible conversations, and put it in a framework that somebody could read in a couple of hours. >> It is also one of those things where you get lightning in a ball, the classic and so then I'd say go big or go home. But Blitzscaling is all about something new and something different. And I'm reading a book right now called Loonshots, which is a goof on moonshots. It's about the loonies who start the real companies and a lot of companies that are successful like Airbnb was passed over on and they call those loonies. Those aren't moonshots. Moonshots are well known, build-outs. This is where the blitzscaling kind of magic happens. Can you just share your thoughts on that because that's something that's not always talked about in the mainstream press, is that a lot of there blitzscaling companies, are the ones that don't look good on paper initially. >> Yes. >> Or ones that no one's talking about is not in a category or herd mentality of investors. It's really that outlier. >> Yes. >> Talk about that dynamic. >> Yeah, and one of the things that Reid likes to say is that the best possible companies usually sound like they're dumb ideas. And in fact the best investment he's been a part of as a venture capitalist, those are the ones where there's the greatest controversy around the table. It's not the companies that come in and everyone's like this is a no-brainer, let's do it. It's the companies where there's a big fight. Should we do this, should we not? And we think the reason is this. Blitzscaling is all about being able to be the first to scale and the winner take most or the winner take all market. Now if you're in a market where everyone's like, this is a great market, this is a great idea. You're going to have huge competition. You're going to have a lot of people going after it. It's very difficult to be the first to scale. If you are contrarian and right you believe something that other people don't believe, you have the space to build that early lead, that you can then use to leverage yourself into that enduring market leadership. >> And one of the things that I observed from the videos as well is that the other fact that kind of plays into, I want to get your reaction, this is that there has to be a market shift that goes on too because you have to have a tailwind or a wave to ride because if you can be contrarian if there's no wave, >> Right. >> right? so a lot of these companies that you guys highlight, have the wave behind them. It was mobile computing, SaaSification, cloud computing, all kind of coming together. Talk about that dynamic and your reaction 'cause that's something where people can get confused on blitzscaling. They read the book. Oh I'm going to disrupt the dry cleaning business. Well I mean, not really. I mean, unless there's something different >> Exactly. >> in market conditions. Talk about that. >> Yeah, so with blitzscaling you're really talking about a new market or a market that's transforming. So what is it that causes these things to transform? Almost always it's some new form of technological innovation, or perhaps a packaging of different technological innovations. Take mobile computing for example. Many of the components have been around for a while. But it took off when Apple was able to combine together capacitative touchscreens and the form factor and the processor strength being high enough finally. And all these things together created the technological innovation. The technological innovation then enables the business model innovation of building an app store and creating a whole new way of thinking about handheld computing. And then based on that business model innovation, you have the strategy innovation of blitzscaling to allow you to grow rapidly and keep from blowing up when you grow. >> And the spirit of kind of having, kind of a clean entrepreneurial segmentation here. Blitzscaling isn't for everybody. And I want you to talk about that because obviously the book's popular when this controversy, there's some controversy around the fact that you just can't apply blitzscaling to everything. We just talk about some of those factors. There are other entrepreneurialship models that makes sense but that might not be a fit for blitzscaling. Can you just unpack that and just explain, a minute to explain the difference between a company that's good for blitzscaling and one that isn't. >> Well, a key thing that you need for blitzscaling is one of these winner take most or winner take all markets that's just enormous and hugely valuable, alright? The whole thing about blitzscaling is it's very risky. It takes a lot of effort. It's very uncomfortable. So it's only worth doing when you have those market dynamics and when that market is really large. And so in the book we talk about there being many businesses that this doesn't apply to. And we use the example of two companies that were started at the same time. One company is Amazon, which is obviously a blitzscaling company and a dominant player and a great, great company. And the other is the French Laundry. In fact, Jeff Bezos started Amazon the same year that Thomas Keller started the French Laundry. And the French Laundry still serves just 60 people a day. But it's a great business. It's just a very different kind of business. >> It's a lifestyle or cash flow business and people call it a lifestyle business but mainly it's a cash flow or not a huge growing market. >> Yeah. >> Satisfies that need. What's the big learnings that you learned that was something different that you didn't know coming out of blitzscaling experience? Something that surprised you, something that might have shocked you, something that might have moved you. I mean you're well-read. You're smart. What was some learnings that you learned from the journey? >> Well, one of the things that was really interesting to me and I didn't really think about it. Reid and I come from the startup world, not the big company world. One of the things that surprised me is the receptivity of big companies to these ideas. And they explained it to me and they said, listen, you got to understand with a big company, you think it's just a big company growing at 10, 15% a year. But actually there's units that are growing at 100% a year. There's units that are declining at 50% a year. And figuring out how you can actually continue to grow new businesses quicker than your old businesses die is a huge thing for the big, established companies. So that was one of the things that really surprised me but I'm grateful that it appears that it's applicable. >> It's interesting. I had a lot of conversations with Michael Dell before, and before they went private and after they went private. He essentially was blitzscaling. >> Yeah. >> He said, I'm going to winner take most in the mature, somewhat declining massive IT enterprise spend against the HPs of the world, and he's doing it and VMware stock went to an all time high. So big companies can blitz scale. That's the learning. >> Exactly. And the key thing to remember there is one of the reasons why somebody like Michael Dell went private to do this is that blitzscaling is all about prioritizing speed over efficiency. Guess who doesn't like that? Wall street doesn't like because you're taking a hit to earnings as you invest in a new business. GM for example is investing heavily in autonomous vehicles and that investment is not yet delivering cash but it's something that's going to create a huge value for General Motors. And so it's really tough to do blitzscaling as a publicly traded company though there are examples. >> I know your partner in the book, Reid Hoffman as well as in the blitzscaling at Stanford was as visible in both LinkedIn and as the venture capitalist of Greylock. But also he was involved with some failed startups on the front end of LinkedIn. >> Yeah. >> So he had some scar tissue on social networking before it became big, I'll say on the knowledge graph that he's building, he built at LinkedIn. I'm sure he had some blitzscaling lessons. What did he bring to the table? Did he share anything in the classes or privately with you that you can share that might be helpful for people to know? >> Well, there's a huge number of lessons. Obviously we drew heavily on Reid's life for the book. But I think you touched on something that a lot of people don't know, which is that LinkedIn is not the first social network that Reid created. Actually during the dot-com boom Reid created a company called SocialNet that was one of the world's first social networks. And I actually was one of the few people in the world who signed up and was a member of SocialNet. I think I had the handle, net revolutionary on that if you can believe that. And one of the things that Reid learned from his SocialNet experience turned into one of his famous sayings, which is, if you're not embarrassed by your first product launch, you've launched too late. With SocialNet they spent so much time refining the product and trying to get it perfectly right. And then when they launched it, they discovered what everyone always discovers when they launch, which is the market wants something totally different. We had no idea what people really wanted. And they'd wasted all this time trying to perfect something that they've theoretically thought was what the market wanted but wasn't actually what the market wanted. >> This is what I love about Silicon Valley. You have these kind of stories 'cause that's essentially agile before agile came out. They're kind of rearranging the deck chairs trying to get the perfect crafted product in a world that was moving to more agility, less craftsmanship and although now it's coming back. Also I talked to Paul Martino, been on theCUBE before. He's a tribe with Pincus. And it's been those founding fathers around these industries. It's interesting how these waves, they start off, they don't get off the ground, but that doesn't mean the category's dead. It's just a timing issue. That's important in a lot of ventures, the timing piece. Talk about that dynamic. >> Absolutely. When it comes to timing, you think about blitzscaling. If you start blitzscaling, you prioritize speed over efficiency. The main question is, is it the right time. So Webvan could be taken as an example of blitzscaling. They were spending money wildly inefficiently to build up grocery delivery. Guess what? 2000 was not the right time for it. Now we come around, we see Instacart succeeding. We see other delivery services delivering some value. It just turns out that you have to get the timing right. >> And market conditions are critical and that's why blitzscaling can work when the conditions are right. Our days back in the podcast, it was, we were right but timing was off. And this brings up the question of the team. >> Yeah. >> You got to have the right team that can handle the blitzscaling culture. And you need the right investors. You've been on both sides of the table. Talk about that dynamic because I think this is probably one of the most important features because saying you going to do blitzscaling and then getting buy off but not true commitment from the investors because the whole idea is to plow money into the system. You mentioned Amazon, one of Jeff Bezos' tricks was, he always poured money back into his business. So this is a capital strategy, as well financial strategy capital-wise as well as a business trait. Talk about the importance of having that stomach and the culture of blitzscaling. >> Absolutely. And I think you hit on something very important when you sort of talk about the importance of the investors. So Reid likes to refer to investors as financing partners. Or financing co-founders, because really they're coming on with you and committing to the same journey that you're going on. And one of the things I often tell entrepreneurs is you really have to dig deep and make sure you do more due diligence on your investors than you would on your employees. Because if you think about it, if you hire an employee, you can actually fire them. If you take money from an investor, there's no way you can ever get rid of them. So my advice to entrepreneurs is always, well, figure out if they're going to be a good partner for you. And the best way to do that is to go find some of the entrepreneurs they backed who failed and talked to those people. >> 'Cause that's where the truth will come out. >> Well, that's right. >> We stood by them in tough times. >> Exactly. >> I think that's classic, that's perfect but this notion of having the strategies of the elements of the business model in concert, the financial strategy, the capital strategy with the business strategy and the people strategy, all got to be pumping that can't be really any conflict on that. That's the key point. >> That's right, there has to be alignment because again, you're trying to go as quickly as possible and if you're running a race car and you have things that are loose and rattling around, you're not going to make it across the finish line. >> You're pulling for a pit stop and the guys aren't ready to change the tires, (snapping fingers) you know you're out of sync. >> Bingo. >> Chris, great stuff. Blitzscaling is a great book. Check it out. I recommend it, remember blitz scale is not for anyone, it's for the game changers. And again, picking your investors is critical on this. So if you picked the wrong investors, blitzscaling will blow up in a bad way. So don't, don't, pick properly on the visa and pick your team. Chris, so let's talk about you real quick to end the segment and the last talk track. Talk about your background 'cause I think you have a fascinating background. I didn't know that you graduated when you're 19, from Stanford was it? >> Yes. >> Stanford at 19, that's a great accomplishment. You've been an entrepreneur. Take us through your journey. Give us a quick highlight of your career. >> So the quick highlight is I grew up in Southern California and Santa Monica where I graduated from Santa Monica High School along with other luminaries such as Rob Lowe, Robert Downey, Jr., and Sean Penn. I didn't go at the same time that they did. >> They didn't graduate when they were 17. >> They did not, (John laughing) and Charlie Sheen also attended Santa Monica High School but dropped out or was expelled. (laughing) Go figured. >> Okay. >> I came up to Stanford and I actually studied creative writing and product design. So I was really hitting both sides of the brain. You could see that really coming through in the rest of my career. And then at the time I graduated which was the mid-1990s that was when the internet was first opening up. I was convinced the internet was going to be huge and so I just went straight into the internet in 1995. And have been in the startup world ever since. >> Must love that show, Halt and Catch Fire a series which I love reminiscing. >> AMC great show. >> Just watching that my life right before my eyes. Us old folks. Talk about your investment. You are at Wasabi Ventures now. Blitzscaling Ventures. You guys looks like you're going to do a little combination bring capital around blitzscaling, advising. What's Blitzscaling Ventures? Give a quick commercial. >> So the best way to think about it is for the entrepreneurs who are actually are blitzscaling, the question is how are you going to get the help you need to figure out how to steer around the corners to avoid the pitfalls that can occur as you're growing rapidly. And Blitzscaling Ventures is all about that. So obviously I bring a wealth of experience, both my own experience as well as everything I learned from putting this book together. And the whole goal of Blitzscaling Ventures is to find those entrepreneurs who have those blitzscalable opportunities and help them navigate through the process. >> And of course being a Mental Samurai that you are, the clock is really important on blitzscaling. >> There are actually are a lot of similarities between the startup world and Mental Samurai. Being able to perform under pressure, being able to move as quickly as possible yet still be accurate. The one difference of course is in our startup world you often do make mistakes. And you have a chance to recover from them. But in Mental Samurai you have to be perfect. >> Speed, alignment, resource management, capital deployment, management team, investors, all critical factors in blitzscaling. Kind of like entrepreneurial going to next level. A whole nother lesson, whole nother battlefields. Really the capital markets are flush with cash. Post round B so if you can certainly get altitude there's a ton of capital. >> Yeah. And the key is that capital is necessary for blitzscaling but it's not sufficient. You have to take that financial capital and you have to figure out how to combine it with the human capital to actually transform the business in the industry. >> Of course I know you've got to catch a plane. Thanks for coming by in the studio. Congratulations on the Mental Samurai. Great show. I'm looking forward to April 30th. Tuesdays at 9 o'clock, the Mental Samurai. Chris will be an inaugural contestant. We'll see how he does. He's tight-lipped, he's not breaking his disclosure. >> I've got legal requirements. I can't say anything. >> Just say he's sticking to his words. He's a man of his words. Chris, great to see you. Venture capitalist, entrepreneur, kind of venture you want to talk to Chris Yeh, co-founder, general partner of blitzscaling. I'm John Furrier for theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
in the heart of Silicon Valley, author of the book Blitzscaling with Reid Hoffman, So Mental Samurai is on Fox, So big thing. that moves you around from station to station, and the key is to get through the obstacle course. And they do try to jar you up, of moving around from station to station Only one person passed the first threshold. What's the format? And the idea is they're adding to the pressure. What's the categories, if you will, And the idea is in order to be truly intelligent, Were you identified, they've read your blog. Turns out that show never got the green light. because the secret to these shows that they said to you on the feedback? And so that was probably the part So congratulations, good luck on the show. Great to be at the launch party last night. And so I'll come back to you. And all that experience in your life, like every run starts with you facing straight up, right? kind of the Silicon Valley way And one of the things that happened and a lot of companies that are successful like Airbnb It's really that outlier. Yeah, and one of the things that Reid likes to say so a lot of these companies that you guys highlight, Talk about that. to allow you to grow rapidly And I want you to talk about that And so in the book we talk about there being and people call it a lifestyle business What's the big learnings that you learned is the receptivity of big companies to these ideas. I had a lot of conversations with Michael Dell before, against the HPs of the world, And the key thing to remember there is and as the venture capitalist of Greylock. or privately with you that you can share And one of the things that Reid learned but that doesn't mean the category's dead. When it comes to timing, you think about blitzscaling. Our days back in the podcast, that can handle the blitzscaling culture. And one of the things I often tell entrepreneurs of the business model in concert, and you have things that are loose and rattling around, and the guys aren't ready to change the tires, I didn't know that you graduated when you're 19, Take us through your journey. So the quick highlight is I grew up and Charlie Sheen also attended Santa Monica High School And have been in the startup world ever since. Must love that show, Halt and Catch Fire Talk about your investment. the question is how are you going to get the help And of course being a Mental Samurai that you are, And you have a chance to recover from them. Really the capital markets are flush with cash. and you have to figure out how to combine it Thanks for coming by in the studio. I can't say anything. kind of venture you want to talk to Chris Yeh,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Chris Yeh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Diane Greene | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Charlie Sheen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brian Chesky | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alex Trebek | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Schmidt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Martino | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rob Lowe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sean Penn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Reid | PERSON | 0.99+ |
General Motors | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
1995 | DATE | 0.99+ |
April 30th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mental Samurai | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Germany | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
360 degrees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
March 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Santa Monica | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wasabi Ventures | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
40 hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Southern California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
12 questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thomas Keller | PERSON | 0.99+ |
90 seconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Greylock Partners | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Santa Monica High School | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Olympics | EVENT | 0.99+ |
9 p.m. | DATE | 0.99+ |
$100,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$10,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos' | PERSON | 0.99+ |
17 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Blitzscaling | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
less than five minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stanford Business School | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
first run | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Robert Downey, Jr. | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two levels | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Baywatch | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
American Ninja Warrior | TITLE | 0.99+ |
19 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SocialNet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
nine o'clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
Glenn Rifkin | CUBEConversation, March 2019
>> From the SiliconANGLE Media office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCube! (funky electronic music) Now, here's your host, Dave Vellante! >> Welcome, everybody, to this Cube conversation here in our Marlborough offices. I am very excited today, I spent a number of years at IDC, which, of course, is owned by IDG. And there's a new book out, relatively new, called Future Forward: Leadership Lessons from Patrick McGovern, the Visionary Who Circled the Globe and Built a Technology Media Empire. And it's a great book, lotta stories that I didn't know, many that I did know, and the author of that book, Glenn Rifkin, is here to talk about not only Pat McGovern but also some of the lessons that he put forth to help us as entrepreneurs and leaders apply to create better businesses and change the world. Glenn, thanks so much for comin' on theCube. >> Thank you, Dave, great to see ya. >> So let me start with, why did you write this book? >> Well, a couple reasons. The main reason was Patrick McGovern III, Pat's son, came to me at the end of 2016 and said, "My father had died in 2014 and I feel like his legacy deserves a book, and many people told me you were the guy to do it." So the background on that I, myself, worked at IDG back in the 1980s, I was an editor at Computerworld, got to know Pat during that time, did some work for him after I left Computerworld, on a one-on-one basis. Then I would see him over the years, interview him for the New York Times or other magazines, and every time I'd see Pat, I'd end our conversation by saying, "Pat, when are we gonna do your book?" And he would laugh, and he would say, "I'm not ready to do that yet, there's just still too much to do." And so it became sort of an inside joke for us, but I always really did wanna write this book about him because I felt he deserved a book. He was just one of these game-changing pioneers in the tech industry. >> He really was, of course, the book was even more meaningful for me, we, you and I started right in the same time, 1983-- >> Yeah. >> And by that time, IDG was almost 20 years old and it was quite a powerhouse then, but boy, we saw, really the ascendancy of IDG as a brand and, you know, the book reviews on, you know, the back covers are tech elite: Benioff wrote the forward, Mark Benioff, you had Bill Gates in there, Walter Isaacson was in there, Guy Kawasaki, Bob Metcalfe, George Colony-- >> Right. >> Who actually worked for a little stint at IDC for a while. John Markoff of The New York Times, so, you know, the elite of tech really sort of blessed this book and it was really a lot to do with Pat McGovern, right? >> Oh, absolutely, I think that the people on the inside understood how important he was to the history of the tech industry. He was not, you know, a household name, first of all, you didn't think of Steve Jobs, Bill Gates, and then Pat McGovern, however, those who are in the know realize that he was as important in his own way as they were. Because somebody had to chronicle this story, somebody had to share the story of the evolution of this amazing information technology and how it changed the world. And Pat was never a front-of-the-TV-camera guy-- >> Right. >> He was a guy who put his people forward, he put his products forward, for sure, which is why IDG, as a corporate name, you know, most people don't know what that means, but people did know Macworld, people did know PCWorld, they knew IDC, they knew Computerworld for sure. So that was Pat's view of the world, he didn't care whether he had the spotlight on him or not. >> When you listen to leaders like Reed Hoffman or Eric Schmidt talk about, you know, great companies and how to build great companies, they always come back to culture. >> Yup. >> The book opens with a scene of, and we all, that I usually remember this, well, we're just hangin' around, waitin' for Pat to come in and hand out what was then called the Christmas bonus-- >> Right. >> Back when that wasn't politically incorrect to say. Now, of course, it's the holiday bonus. But it was, it was the Christmas bonus time and Pat was coming around and he was gonna personally hand a bonus, which was a substantial bonus, to every single employee at the company. I mean, and he did that, really, literally, forever. >> Forever, yeah. >> Throughout his career. >> Yeah, it was unheard of, CEOs just didn't do that and still don't do that, you were lucky, you got a message on the, you know, in the lunchroom from the CEO, "Good work, troops! Keep up the good work!" Pat just had a really different view of the culture of this company, as you know from having been there, and I know. It was very familial, there was a sense that we were all in this together, and it really was important for him to let every employee know that. The idea that he went to every desk in every office for IDG around the United States, when we were there in the '80s there were probably 5,000 employees in the US, he had to devote substantial amount-- >> Weeks and weeks! >> Weeks at a time to come to every building and do this, but year after year he insisted on doing it, his assistant at the time, Mary Dolaher told me she wanted to sign the cards, the Christmas cards, and he insisted that he ensign every one of them personally. This was the kind of view he had of how you keep employees happy, if your employees are happy, the customers are gonna be happy, and you're gonna make a lot of money. And that's what he did. >> And it wasn't just that. He had this awesome holiday party that you described, which was epic, and during the party, they would actually take pictures of every single person at the party and then they would load the carousel, you remember the 35-mm. carousel, and then, you know, toward the end of the evening, they would play that and everybody was transfixed 'cause they wanted to see their, the picture of themselves! >> Yeah, yeah. (laughs) >> I mean, it was ge-- and to actually pull that off in the 1980s was not trivial! Today, it would be a piece of cake. And then there was the IDG update, you know, the Good News memos, there was the 10-year lunch, the 20-year trips around the world, there were a lot of really rich benefits that, you know, in and of themselves maybe not a huge deal, but that was the culture that he set. >> Yeah, there was no question that if you talked to anybody who worked in this company over, say, the last 50 years, you were gonna get the same kind of stories. I've been kind of amazed, I'm going around, you know, marketing the book, talking about the book at various events, and the deep affection for this guy that still holds five years after he died, it's just remarkable. You don't really see that with the CEO class, there's a couple, you know, Steve Jobs left a great legacy of creativity, he was not a wonderful guy to his employees, but Pat McGovern, people loved this guy, and they st-- I would be signing books and somebody'd say, "Oh, I've been at IDG for 27 years and I remember all of this," and "I've been there 33 years," and there's a real longevity to this impact that he had on people. >> Now, the book was just, it was not just sort of a biography on McGovern, it was really about lessons from a leader and an entrepreneur and a media mogul who grew this great company in this culture that we can apply, you know, as business people and business leaders. Just to give you a sense of what Pat McGovern did, he really didn't take any outside capital, he did a little bit of, you know, public offering with IDG Books, but, really, you know, no outside capital, it was completely self-funded. He built a $3.8 billion empire, 300 publications, 280 million readers, and I think it was almost 100 or maybe even more, 100 countries. And so, that's an-- like you were, used the word remarkable, that is a remarkable achievement for a self-funded company. >> Yeah, Pat had a very clear vision of how, first of all, Pat had a photographic memory and if you were a manager in the company, you got a chance to sit in meetings with Pat and if you didn't know the numbers better than he did, which was a tough challenge, you were in trouble! 'Cause he knew everything, and so, he was really a numbers-focused guy and he understood that, you know, his best way to make profit was to not be looking for outside funding, not to have to share the wealth with investors, that you could do this yourself if you ran it tightly, you know, I called it in the book a 'loose-tight organization,' loose meaning he was a deep believer in decentralization, that every market needed its own leadership because they knew the market, you know, in Austria or in Russia or wherever, better than you would know it from a headquarters in Boston, but you also needed that tightness, a firm grip on the finances, you needed to know what was going on with each of the budgets or you were gonna end up in big trouble, which a lot of companies find themselves in. >> Well, and, you know, having worked there, I mean, essentially, if you made your numbers and did so ethically, and if you just kind of followed some of the corporate rules, which we'll talk about, he kind of left you alone. You know, you could, you could pretty much do whatever you wanted, you could stay in any hotel, you really couldn't fly first class, and we'll maybe talk about that-- >> Right. >> But he was a complex man, I mean, he was obviously wealthy, he was a billionaire, he was very generous, but at the same time he was frugal, you know, he drove, you know, a little, a car that was, you know, unremarkable, and we had buy him a car. He flew coach, and I remember one time, I was at a United flight, and I was, I had upgraded, you know, using my miles, and I sat down and right there was Lore McGovern, and we both looked at each other and said right at the same time, "I upgraded!" (laughs) Because Pat never flew up front, but he would always fly with a stack of newspapers in the seat next to him. >> Yeah, well, woe to, you were lucky he wasn't on the plane and spotted you as he was walking past you into coach, because he was not real forgiving when he saw people, people would hide and, you know, try to avoid him at all cost. And, I mean, he was a big man, Pat was 6'3", you know, 250 lbs. at least, built like a linebacker, so he didn't fit into coach that well, and he wasn't flying, you know, the shuttle to New York, he was flyin' to Beijing, he was flyin' to Moscow, he was going all over the world, squeezing himself into these seats. Now, you know, full disclosure, as he got older and had, like, probably 10 million air miles at his disposal, he would upgrade too, occasionally, for those long-haul flights, just 'cause he wanted to be fresh when he would get off the plane. But, yeah, these are legends about Pat that his frugality was just pure legend in the company, he owned this, you know, several versions of that dark blue suit, and that's what you would see him in. He would never deviate from that. And, but, he had his patterns, but he understood the impact those patterns had on his employees and on his customers. >> I wanna get into some of the lessons, because, really, this is what the book is all about, the heart of it. And you mentioned, you know, one, and we're gonna tell from others, but you really gotta stay close to the customer, that was one of the 10 corporate values, and you remember, he used to go to the meetings and he'd sometimes randomly ask people to recite, "What's number eight?" (laughs) And you'd be like, oh, you'd have your cheat sheet there. And so, so, just to give you a sense, this man was an entrepreneur, he started the company in 1964 with a database that he kind of pre-sold, he was kind of the sell, design, build type of mentality, he would pre-sold this thing, and then he started Computerworld in 1967, so it was really only a few years after he launched the company that he started the Computerworld, and other than Data Nation, there was nothing there, huge pent-up demand for that type of publication, and he caught lightning in a bottle, and that's really how he funded, you know, the growth. >> Yeah, oh, no question. Computerworld became, you know, the bible of the industry, it became a cash cow for IDG, you know, but at the time, it's so easy to look in hindsight and say, oh, well, obviously. But when Pat was doing this, one little-known fact is he was an editor at a publication called Computers and Automation that was based in Newton, Massachusetts and he kept that job even after he started IDC, which was the original company in 1964. It was gonna be a research company, and it was doing great, he was seeing the build-up, but it wasn't 'til '67 when he started Computerworld, that he said, "Okay, now this is gonna be a full-time gig for me," and he left the other publication for good. But, you know, he was sorta hedging his bets there for a little while. >> And that's where he really gained respect for what we'll call the 'Chinese Wallet,' the, you know, editorial versus advertising. We're gonna talk about that some more. So I mentioned, 1967, Computerworld. So he launched in 1964, by 1971, he was goin' to Japan, we're gonna talk about the China Stories as well, so, he named the company International Data Corp, where he was at a little spot in Newton, Mass.-- >> Right, right. >> So, he had a vision. You said in your book, you mention, how did this gentleman get it so right for so long? And that really leads to some of the leadership lessons, and one of them in the book was, sort of, have a mission, have a vision, and really, Pat was always talking about information, about information technology, in fact, when Wine for Dummies came out, it kind of created a little friction, that was really off the center. >> Or Wine for Dummies, or Sex for Dummies! >> Yeah, Sex for Dummies, boy, yeah! >> With, that's right, Ruth Westheimer-- >> Dr. Ruth Westheimer. >> But generally speaking, Glenn, he was on that mark, he really didn't deviate from that vision. >> Yeah, no, it was very crucial to the development of the company that he got people to, you know, buy into that mission, because the mission was everything. And he understood, you know, he had the numbers, but he also saw what was happening out there, from the 1960s, when IBM mainframes filled a room, and, you know, only the high priests of data centers could touch them. He had a vision for, you know, what was coming next and he started to understand that there would be many facets to this information about information technology, it wasn't gonna be boring, if anything, it was gonna be the story of our age and he was gonna stick to it and sell it. >> And, you know, timing is everything, but so is, you know, Pat was a workaholic and had an amazing mind, but one of the things I learned from the book, and you said this, Pat Kenealy mentioned it, all American industrial and social revolutions have had a media company linked to them, Crane and automobiles, Penton and energy, McGraw-Hill and aerospace, Annenberg, of course, and TV, and in technology, it was IDG. >> Yeah, he, like I said earlier, he really was a key figure in the development of this industry and it was, you know, one of the key things about that, a lot publications that came and went made the mistake of being platform or, you know, vertical market specific. And if that market changed, and it was inevitably gonna change in high tech, you were done. He never, you know, he never married himself to some specific technology cycle. His idea was the audience was not gonna change, the audience was gonna have to roll with this, so, the company, IDG, would produce publications that got that, you know, Computerworld was actually a little bit late to the PC game, but eventually got into it and we tracked the different cycles, you know, things in tech move in sine waves, they come and go. And Pat never was, you know, flustered by that, he could handle any kind of changes from the mainframes down to the smartphone when it came. And so, that kind of flexibility, and ability to adjust to markets, really was unprecedented in that particular part of the market. >> One of the other lessons in the book, I call it 'nation-building,' and Pat shared with you that, look, that you shared, actually, with your readers, if you wanna do it right, you've gotta be on the ground, you've gotta be there. And the China story is one that I didn't know about how Pat kind of talked his way into China, tell us, give us a little summary of that story. >> Sure, I love that story because it's so Pat. It was 1978, Pat was in Tokyo on a business trip, one of his many business trips, and he was gonna be flying to Moscow for a trade show. And he got a flight that was gonna make a stopover in Beijing, which in those days was called Peking, and was not open to Americans. There were no US and China diplomatic relations then. But Pat had it in mind that he was going to get off that plane in Beijing and see what he could see. So that meant that he had to leave the flight when it landed in Beijing and talk his way through the customs as they were in China at the time with folks in the, wherever, the Quonset hut that served for the airport, speaking no English, and him speaking no Chinese, he somehow convinced these folks to give him a day pass, 'cause he kept saying to them, "I'm only in transit, it's okay!" (laughs) Like, he wasn't coming, you know, to spy on them on them or anything. So here's this massive American businessman in his dark suit, and he somehow gets into downtown Beijing, which at the time was mostly bicycles, very few cars, there were camels walking down the street, they'd come with traders from Mongolia. The people were still wearing the drab outfits from the Mao era, and Pat just spent the whole day wandering around the city, just soaking it in. He was that kind of a world traveler. He loved different cultures, mostly eastern cultures, and he would pop his head into bookstores. And what he saw were people just clamoring to get their hands on anything, a newspaper, a magazine, and it just, it didn't take long for the light bulb to go on and said, this is a market we need to play in. >> He was fascinated with China, I, you know, as an employee and a business P&L manager, I never understood it, I said, you know, the per capita spending on IT in China was like a dollar, you know? >> Right. >> And I remember my lunch with him, my 10-year lunch, he said, "Yeah, but, you know, there's gonna be a huge opportunity there, and yeah, I don't know how we're gonna get the money out, maybe we'll buy a bunch of tea and ship it over, but I'm not worried about that." And, of course, he meets Hugo Shong, which is a huge player in the book, and the home run out of China was, of course, the venture capital, which he started before there was even a stock market, really, to exit in China. >> Right, yeah. No, he was really a visionary, I mean, that word gets tossed around maybe more than it should, but Pat was a bonafide visionary and he saw things in China that were developing that others didn't see, including, for example, his own board, who told him he was crazy because in 1980, he went back to China without telling them and within days he had a meeting with the ministry of technology and set up a joint venture, cost IDG $250,000, and six months later, the first issue of China Computerworld was being published and within a couple of years it was the biggest publication in China. He said, told me at some point that $250,0000 investment turned into $85 million and when he got home, that first trip, the board was furious, they said, "How can you do business with the commies? You're gonna ruin our brand!" And Pat said, "Just, you know, stick with me on this one, you're gonna see." And the venture capital story was just an offshoot, he saw the opportunity in the early '90s, that venture in China could in fact be a huge market, why not help build it? And that's what he did. >> What's your take on, so, IDG sold to, basically, Chinese investors. >> Yeah. >> It's kind of bittersweet, but in the same time, it's symbolic given Pat's love for China and the Chinese people. There's been a little bit of criticism about that, I know that the US government required IDC to spin out its supercomputer division because of concerns there. I'm always teasing Michael Dow that at the next IDG board meeting, those Lenovo numbers, they're gonna look kinda law. (laughs) But what are your, what's your, what are your thoughts on that, in terms of, you know, people criticize China in terms of IP protections, etc. What would Pat have said to that, do you think? >> You know, Pat made 130 trips to China in his life, that's, we calculated at some point that just the air time in planes would have been something like three and a half to four years of his life on planes going to China and back. I think Pat would, today, acknowledge, as he did then, that China has issues, there's not, you can't be that naive. He got that. But he also understood that these were people, at the end of the day, who were thirsty and hungry for information and that they were gonna be a player in the world economy at some point, and that it was crucial for IDG to be at the forefront of that, not just play later, but let's get in early, let's lead the parade. And I think that, you know, some part of him would have been okay with the sale of the company to this conglomerate there, called China Oceanwide. Clearly controversial, I mean, but once Pat died, everyone knew that the company was never gonna be the same with the leader who had been at the helm for 50 years, it was gonna be a tough transition for whoever took over. And I think, you know, it's hard to say, certainly there's criticism of things going on with China. China's gonna be the hot topic page one of the New York Times almost every single day for a long time to come. I think Pat would have said, this was appropriate given my love of China, the kind of return on investment he got from China, I think he would have been okay with it. >> Yeah, and to invoke the Ben Franklin maxim, "Trading partners seldom wage war," and so, you know, I think Pat would have probably looked at it that way, but, huge home run, I mean, I think he was early on into Baidu and Alibaba and Tencent and amazing story. I wanna talk about decentralization because that was always something that was just on our minds as employees of IDG, it was keep the corporate staff lean, have a flat organization, if you had eight, 10, 12 direct reports, that was okay, Pat really meant it when he said, "You're the CEO of your own business!" Whether that business was, you know, IDC, big company, or a manager at IDC, where you might have, you know, done tens of millions of dollars, but you felt like a CEO, you were encouraged to try new things, you were encouraged to fail, and fail fast. Their arch nemesis of IDG was Ziff Davis, they were a command and control, sort of Bill Ziff, CMP to a certain extent was kind of the same way out of Manhasset, totally different philosophies and I think Pat never, ever even came close to wavering from that decentralization philosophy, did he? >> No, no, I mean, I think that the story that he told me that I found fascinating was, he didn't have an epiphany that decentralization would be the mechanism for success, it was more that he had started traveling, and when he'd come back to his office, the memos and requests and papers to sign were stacked up two feet high. And he realized that he was holding up the company because he wasn't there to do this and that at some point, he couldn't do it all, it was gonna be too big for that, and that's when the light came on and said this decentralization concept really makes sense for us, if we're gonna be an international company, which clearly was his mission from the beginning, we have to say the people on the ground in those markets are the people who are gonna make the decisions because we can't make 'em from Boston. And I talked to many people who, were, you know, did a trip to Europe, met the folks in London, met the folks in Munich, and they said to a person, you know, it was so ahead of its time, today it just seems obvious, but in the 1960s, early '70s, it was really not a, you know, a regular leadership tenet in most companies. The command and control that you talked about was the way that you did business. >> And, you know, they both worked, but, you know, from a cultural standpoint, clearly IDG and IDC have had staying power, and he had the three-quarter rule, you talked about it in your book, if you missed your numbers three quarters in a row, you were in trouble. >> Right. >> You know, one quarter, hey, let's talk, two quarters, we maybe make some changes, three quarters, you're gone. >> Right. >> And so, as I said, if you were makin' your numbers, you had wide latitude. One of the things you didn't have latitude on was I'll call it 'pay to play,' you know, crossing that line between editorial and advertising. And Pat would, I remember I was at a meeting one time, I'm sorry to tell these stories, but-- >> That's okay. (laughs) >> But we were at an offsite meeting at a woods meeting and, you know, they give you a exercise, go off and tell us what the customer wants. Bill Laberis, who's the editor-in-chief at Computerworld at the time, said, "Who's the customer?" And Pat said, "That's a great question! To the publisher, it's the advertiser. To you, Bill, and the editorial staff, it's the reader. And both are equally important." And Pat would never allow the editorial to be compromised by the advertiser. >> Yeah, no, he, there was a clear barrier between church and state in that company and he, you know, consistently backed editorial on that issue because, you know, keep in mind when we started then, and I was, you know, a journalist hoping to, you know, change the world, the trade press then was considered, like, a little below the mainstream business press. The trade press had a reputation for being a little too cozy with the advertisers, so, and Pat said early on, "We can't do that, because everything we have, our product is built, the brand is built on integrity. And if the reader doesn't believe that what we're reporting is actually true and factual and unbiased, we're gonna lose to the advertisers in the long run anyway." So he was clear that that had to be the case and time and again, there would be conflict that would come up, it was just, as you just described it, the publishers, the sales guys, they wanted to bring in money, and if it, you know, occasionally, hey, we could nudge the editor of this particular publication, "Take it a little bit easier on this vendor because they're gonna advertise big with us," Pat just would always back the editor and say, "That's not gonna happen." And it caused, you know, friction for sure, but he was unwavering in his support. >> Well, it's interesting because, you know, Macworld, I think, is an interesting case study because there were sort of some backroom dealings and Pat maneuvered to be able to get the Macworld, you know, brand, the license for that. >> Right. >> But it caused friction between Steve Jobs and the writers of Macworld, they would write something that Steve Jobs, who was a control freak, couldn't control! >> Yeah. (laughs) >> And he regretted giving IDG the license. >> Yeah, yeah, he once said that was the worst decision he ever made was to give the license to Pat to, you know, Macworlld was published on the day that Mac was introduced in 1984, that was the deal that they had and it was, what Jobs forgot was how important it was to the development of that product to have a whole magazine devoted to it on day one, and a really good magazine that, you know, a lot of people still lament the glory days of Macworld. But yeah, he was, he and Steve Jobs did not get along, and I think that almost says a lot more about Jobs because Pat pretty much got along with everybody. >> That church and state dynamic seems to be changing, across the industry, I mean, in tech journalism, there aren't any more tech journalists in the United States, I mean, I'm overstating that, but there are far fewer than there were when we were at IDG. You're seeing all kinds of publications and media companies struggling, you know, Kara Swisher, who's the greatest journalist, and Walt Mossberg, in the tech industry, try to make it, you know, on their own, and they couldn't. So, those lines are somewhat blurring, not that Kara Swisher is blurring those lines, she's, you know, I think, very, very solid in that regard, but it seems like the business model is changing. As an observer of the markets, what do you think's happening in the publishing world? >> Well, I, you know, as a journalist, I'm sort of aghast at what's goin' on these days, a lot of my, I've been around a long time, and seeing former colleagues who are no longer in journalism because the jobs just started drying up is, it's a scary prospect, you know, unlike being the enemy of the people, the first amendment is pretty important to the future of the democracy, so to see these, you know, cutbacks and newspapers going out of business is difficult. At the same time, the internet was inevitable and it was going to change that dynamic dramatically, so how does that play out? Well, the problem is, anybody can post anything they want on social media and call it news, and the challenge is to maintain some level of integrity in the kind of reporting that you do, and it's more important now than ever, so I think that, you know, somebody like Pat would be an important figure if he was still around, in trying to keep that going. >> Well, Facebook and Google have cut the heart out of, you know, a lot of the business models of many media companies, and you're seeing sort of a pendulum swing back to nonprofits, which, I understand, speaking of folks back in the mid to early 1900s, nonprofits were the way in which, you know, journalism got funded, you know, maybe it's billionaires buying things like the Washington Post that help fund it, but clearly the model's shifting and it's somewhat unclear, you know, what's happening there. I wanted to talk about another lesson, which, Pat was the head cheerleader. So, I remember, it was kind of just after we started, the Computerworld's 20th anniversary, and they hired the marching band and they walked Pat and Mary Dolaher walked from 5 Speen Street, you know, IDG headquarters, they walked to Computerworld, which was up Old, I guess Old Connecticut Path, or maybe it was-- >> It was actually on Route 30-- >> Route 30 at the time, yeah. And Pat was dressed up as the drum major and Mary as well, (laughs) and he would do crazy things like that, he'd jump out of a plane with IDG is number one again, he'd post a, you know, a flag in Antarctica, IDG is number one again! It was just a, it was an amazing dynamic that he had, always cheering people on. >> Yeah, he was, he was, when he called himself the CEO, the Chief Encouragement Officer, you mentioned earlier the Good News notes. Everyone who worked there, at some point received this 8x10" piece of paper with a rainbow logo on it and it said, "Good News!" And there was a personal note from Pat McGovern, out of the blue, totally unexpected, to thank you and congratulate you on some bit of work, whatever it was, if you were a reporter, some article you wrote, if you were a sales guy, a sale that you made, and people all over the world would get these from him and put them up in their cubicles because it was like a badge of honor to have them, and people, I still have 'em, (laughs) you know, in a folder somewhere. And he was just unrelenting in supporting the people who worked there, and it was, the impact of that is something you can't put a price tag on, it's just, it stays with people for all their lives, people who have left there and gone on to four or five different jobs always think fondly back to the days at IDG and having, knowing that the CEO had your back in that manner. >> The legend of, and the legacy of Patrick J. McGovern is not just in IDG and IDC, which you were interested in in your book, I mean, you weren't at IDC, I was, and I was started when I saw the sort of downturn and then now it's very, very successful company, you know, whatever, $3-400 million, throwin' off a lot of profits, just to decide, I worked for every single CEO at IDC with the exception of Pat McGovern, and now, Kirk Campbell, the current CEO, is moving on Crawford del Prete's moving into the role of president, it's just a matter of time before he gets CEO, so I will, and I hired Crawford-- >> Oh, you did? (laughs) >> So, I've worked for and/or hired every CEO of IDC except for Pat McGovern, so, but, the legacy goes beyond IDG and IDC, great brands. The McGovern Brain Institute, 350 million, is that right? >> That's right. >> He dedicated to studying, you know, the human brain, he and Lore, very much involved. >> Yup. >> Typical of Pat, he wasn't just, "Hey, here's the check," and disappear. He was goin' in, "Hey, I have some ideas"-- >> Oh yeah. >> Talk about that a little. >> Yeah, well, this was a guy who spent his whole life fascinated by the human brain and the impact technology would have on the human brain, so when he had enough money, he and Lore, in 2000, gave a $350 million gift to MIT to create the McGovern Institute for Brain Research. At the time, the largest academic gift ever given to any university. And, as you said, Pat wasn't a guy who was gonna write a check and leave and wave goodbye. Pat was involved from day one. He and Lore would come and sit in day-long seminars listening to researchers talk about about the most esoteric research going on, and he would take notes, and he wasn't a brain scientist, but he wanted to know more, and he would talk to researchers, he would send Good News notes to them, just like he did with IDG, and it had same impact. People said, "This guy is a serious supporter here, he's not just showin' up with a checkbook." Bob Desimone, who's the director of the Brain Institute, just marveled at this guy's energy level, that he would come in and for days, just sit there and listen and take it all in. And it just, it was an indicator of what kind of person he was, this insatiable curiosity to learn more and more about the world. And he wanted his legacy to be this intersection of technology and brain research, he felt that this institute could cure all sorts of brain-related diseases, Alzheimer's, Parkinson's, etc. And it would then just make a better future for mankind, and as corny as that might sound, that was really the motivator for Pat McGovern. >> Well, it's funny that you mention the word corny, 'cause a lot of people saw Pat as somewhat corny, but, as you got to know him, you're like, wow, he really means this, he loves his company, the company was his extended family. When Pat met his untimely demise, we held a crowd chat, crowdchat.net/thankspat, and there's a voting mechanism in there, and the number one vote was from Paul Gillen, who posted, "Leo Durocher said that nice guys finish last, Pat McGovern proved that wrong." >> Yeah. >> And I think that's very true and, again, awesome legacy. What number book is this for you? You've written a lot of books. >> This is number 13. >> 13, well, congratulations, lucky 13. >> Thank you. >> The book is Fast Forward-- >> Future Forward. >> I'm sorry, Future Forward! (laughs) Future Forward by Glenn Rifkin. Check out, there's a link in the YouTube down below, check that out and there's some additional information there. Glenn, congratulations on getting the book done, and thanks so much for-- >> Thank you for having me, this is great, really enjoyed it. It's always good to chat with another former IDGer who gets it. (laughs) >> Brought back a lot of memories, so, again, thanks for writing the book. All right, thanks for watching, everybody, we'll see you next time. This is Dave Vellante. You're watchin' theCube. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
many that I did know, and the author of that book, back in the 1980s, I was an editor at Computerworld, you know, the elite of tech really sort of He was not, you know, a household name, first of all, which is why IDG, as a corporate name, you know, or Eric Schmidt talk about, you know, and Pat was coming around and he was gonna and still don't do that, you were lucky, This was the kind of view he had of how you carousel, and then, you know, Yeah, yeah. And then there was the IDG update, you know, Yeah, there was no question that if you talked to he did a little bit of, you know, a firm grip on the finances, you needed to know he kind of left you alone. but at the same time he was frugal, you know, and he wasn't flying, you know, the shuttle to New York, and that's really how he funded, you know, the growth. you know, but at the time, it's so easy to look you know, editorial versus advertising. created a little friction, that was really off the center. But generally speaking, Glenn, he was on that mark, of the company that he got people to, you know, from the book, and you said this, the different cycles, you know, things in tech 'nation-building,' and Pat shared with you that, And he got a flight that was gonna make a stopover my 10-year lunch, he said, "Yeah, but, you know, And Pat said, "Just, you know, stick with me What's your take on, so, IDG sold to, basically, I know that the US government required IDC to everyone knew that the company was never gonna Whether that business was, you know, IDC, big company, early '70s, it was really not a, you know, And, you know, they both worked, but, you know, two quarters, we maybe make some changes, One of the things you didn't have latitude on was (laughs) meeting at a woods meeting and, you know, they give you a backed editorial on that issue because, you know, you know, brand, the license for that. IDG the license. was to give the license to Pat to, you know, As an observer of the markets, what do you think's to the future of the democracy, so to see these, you know, out of, you know, a lot of the business models he'd post a, you know, a flag in Antarctica, the impact of that is something you can't you know, whatever, $3-400 million, throwin' off so, but, the legacy goes beyond IDG and IDC, great brands. you know, the human brain, he and Lore, He was goin' in, "Hey, I have some ideas"-- that was really the motivator for Pat McGovern. Well, it's funny that you mention the word corny, And I think that's very true Glenn, congratulations on getting the book done, Thank you for having me, we'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Pat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
International Data Corp | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bill Laberis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Jobs | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dow | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mary Dolaher | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Gillen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bob Metcalfe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Glenn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mongolia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1984 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Glenn Rifkin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
McGovern | PERSON | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Kara Swisher | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat McGovern | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bob Desimone | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Beijing | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Austria | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ruth Westheimer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1964 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Munich | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Markoff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George Colony | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mark Benioff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1980 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Guy Kawasaki | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$85 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1967 | DATE | 0.99+ |
PCWorld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Walter Isaacson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tokyo | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
$250,0000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Leo Durocher | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Moscow | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
IDG | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IDC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Russia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Benioff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10-year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
50 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Macworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Peking | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Cunningham, Cunningham Collective | CUBEConversation, February 2019
>> Oh, from our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley. Palo ALTO, California. This is a Cube Conversation. >> Hello Everyone. Welcome to this special cube conversation. I'm Childfree, host of The Cube, cofounder of Silicon Angle Media Inc and the Cube. We're here with Andy Cunningham, who is the president and founder of Cunning in collective and also the author of the book. Get to ah ha! Bestseller on line four categories on Amazon E book. Great book. I recommend all Andy. Welcome to the Cube. Great to see you. >> Hey, it's great to be here. Good to see you. You're a thought >> leader. Just what you've been. You've seen many ways of innovation. You've done so much in your career. >> Big, minimal experience. And >> we were all old here. We've no ageism issues here. It's silken angle, but But you've done so much on DH communications and PR. PR is part of communications. You've you've seen it all. You've done it all. And now you're helping cos I've got a great book out, which I recommend everyone should get getting toe really kind of breaks down thirty five years of experience into one book. That you had a talk about the book on your firm for stuff about Connie and collected quick pleasure. >> So Cunningham >> Collective is a small marketing consultancy that focuses on positioning, which in my opinion, is the epicenter of marketing. If you dont position yourself well for success, you're never going to achieve success. So the >> book is >> about a framework for figuring out how to position yourself. And it's a framework I developed probably around seventeen years ago. But I've been using it over the last seventy years with clients, and I find that it's super successful, especially with technology companies, and because it's an actual step by step sort of framework. So the book tells you how to do it. And then there were six case studies at the back of the book that >> show >> Positioning in action. >> I want to get a book at some specific questions on the positioning, but I want to get your take on because you've seen many waves around PR public relations, which is corporate communications and communications in general. Over the years, where are we now? Because you're seeing you know, the media business change face. What's on the front page? Of all the news these days around how they sucked all the data in and fake news. All these things are happening Cos still need to get the word out. You know, New Channel's new realities take us through how you see the evolution of what the old way is in the new way are of communications. >> So PR was >> actually invented by a guy in the nineteen twenties named Eddie Bernays. And Eddie Bernays actually figured out that if you created a stunt like situation, you could get the journalist to cover it. He was very strategic about it. It sounds, sounds kind of, you know, loopy. But he was very strategic about it, and he actually invented the concept that he actually went to the phrase public relations, and he was modeling it after propaganda. That was the that was where he came up with that phrase. So it was like that for quite a long time until we got into an era of what I would call influence her marketing, you know, now we call it influencer marketing. But back in the you know when when there was a lot of investigative journalism going on, it was really just about who's who are the influencers that you need to influence in order to get them to say what you want them to say about your company or your product. So that was what my old boss, Regis McKenna called that, he said. She said, Journalism, if you're going to launch something into the marketplace, you need to get all the he said. And the she says to say what you want them to say before you actually say it yourself, because the journalists are gonna go back to those people and they're going to corroborate your story or not. So the idea was influenced the influencers. And then you can get your story that lasted for about probably thirty years, that era. Now we're in an era, then I call it's the era of content, marketing. And really, what happens today is you almost don't even need the journalists at all, because first of all, there aren't very many of them left. And second of all, there are so many channels available to ourselves as as communicators that if you build a digital footprint that has a great story and it that is compelling and consistent, and you keep saying the same key messages over and over again, you can build yourself a digital footprint that actually becomes starts to take over the word of mouth that we talked about earlier because we're the mouth is really what it's all about. But word of mouth hap and today because from results from a giant digital footprint about your story. >> I remember back in business school back in the day in the nineties when I got my MBA advertising class would break down. You need to copy strategy because, you know, reach media, print ads and radio really was the old school media and frequency was was a certain first radio print. You have time to read it so all the specs get laid out. Reaches reach, Right? So you broadcast cable or TV? The impression >> yeah, kind of digital brings >> everything kind of weaves it all together, but you mentioned frequency. Why is frequencies so important? Because is that because of the targeting, is that because there's not a lot of reaches more specialized? >> Well, it's still it's still the same reason. >> So there's a thing called the marketing rule of seven, and that means that a person needs to hear your message seven times before it. It seeps into their brain, and they actually either decide to do something about it or not do something about it. But that's what creates awareness seven times. So that still is true today as it was before. But now it's so much easier because now you don't have to buy ads to do it. You don't even have to pay a PR person to do it. You just fill your own social channels, your own website, your own blog's your own vlogs, your own video. You just fill up your own personal channels, however many there that you have with your own story. And then once it's out there as a digital footprint, then it's time to start talking to the journalism community, which is smaller than it used to be. But those who are left are pretty good. The Washington Post is pretty good. The New York Times is pretty good. So you call up the guy at The New York Times and you pitched him on your story, and instead of trying to spend a bunch of time pitching him, you just refer him back to someone of your channels. He Googles that he gets online, and he sees, Oh, my God, there's a giant story here because you've built the story. So you have so much more controlled today. We have so much more control over our stories. >> So the way to pitch, then based on what you're saying is to have the raw materials out there so they can make their story >> exactly. Put it together. We put it >> out there, and then the journalists just find it. It's like an Easter egg hunt. Look under that tree >> there. Well, here's a clip >> of an expert that's talking about something you might be interested in. This is the new model. Have the assets. Well, actually, we we love that came in what we do. But I want to get that to the book and the years of experience you have on this. But before we do that, I got to ask you when I was watching the Steve Jobs movie. You know, you're on the stage and you're part of that. >> You must get, well, an actress actress once you get your >> role. You were very instrumental, hectic days, people who know Steve and know the apple days. What >> did you >> learn from that? That's in the book from the Apple days. And how does and what has changed from the apple days. Now is there some things that are similar to the world's changed. But what are some of the key those key Learnings that that those magical moments. >> So my biggest >> key learning was ice. We spent about six months? Was Steve working on the messaging for the launch of the Macintosh, and we got it down to a Siri's of what I would I now call means that were just very, very. The computer for the rest of us was one of them, right? Everybody remembers that one small footprint was another one nobody remembers. Any more easy to use was another one. There was a Siri's of these things to explain the Macintosh. We then went through a process of educating one hundred journalists about about that and pumping them with those key messages at every juncture. Then we go to De Anza College and we did the big launch. We said those messages again and was a bunch of TV people around and everybody you know, everybody reported on it and I'm driving home in the car. After the show was over with, I turn on the radio and there's the messages that I had written, coming back at me over and over and again and change the station. Same thing over and over again. The Macintosh was launched today, and this is what everyone is saying. The same thing is, it was it gave me chills. It was like, Wow, this really works. And that lesson that I learned with Steve is the same lesson Eddie Bernays learned a hundred years ago. Its the same lesson Regis McKenna learned with influencing the influencers. And it's the same lesson people can learn today. You just you just get too. You get, too, ah ha! With a slightly different strategy. And today it's about building a big digital footprint before you ever talk to anybody. >> And I think this is key to the book of one of the things that you mentioned earlier. That's clearly in the book, and this is a lesson for the folks. Watching on and learn from this is that positioning is critical. Before the branding, the knee jerk reaction from most people. A new person Let's re branded system New Low goes out there. You're taking it a contrarian view on >> the sea >> or race on experience and success. Position first brand later or had second thoughts on that Wise wise is so important, specific successes you had. But what other reasons are important? >> Well, I got I learned this because >> the first part of my career I would I would get called in after somebody had already hired a branding firm and they re branded everything, Got a new new logo. New tagline, new color palette, all of this stuff and a few bits of copy that were really sexy and interesting. But they were finding it wasn't sticking. It wasn't making a difference in their in their sales, because, really, at the end of the day, we're all here to sell stuff, right? So I would come in and I would realize, Oh my God, you did all this first you didn't figure out your positioning strategy. Like what? Who are you in the market? And why do you matter? Those two questions are the two most important questions anybody can ask themselves. Is a market or a CEO? Who are you and why do you matter if you can't answer those questions? Doing a branding exercise is a waste of money. >> Talk about >> the conflict involved when you work for the client or when you have to get to this moment. This Ahamo sometimes is not a parent, sometimes is pretty clear. Sometimes you might think you're one, but you're really another. There's always maybe opinions about what, what people are in terms of a company internally amongst executives or the stakeholders. >> Yeah, how do you How do you figure it out? Is heroic >> golden rule or what's your What's your Tell them how to get to that moment of that self reflection >> is sure that sort of that's actually >> the key point of the book. It's it's based positioning. Really good positioning should be based on what your DNA as a company is, and the book tells you how to determine what is your DNA. But the the end of the day. They're three kinds of companies. There are product focus cos I happen to call them mechanics. There are customer focus, cos I call them mothers, and they're our concept, Focus Cos I call them missionaries. And interestingly, each of these types of companies do things entirely differently. They talk about different things and meetings. They hire different kinds of people. They train them differently. They measure success differently. They market themselves differently. There's actually, the DNA is reflected in there actions. So when I'm sitting around a workshop with a client, we have to determine Are they a mother? Are they a missionary or are there mechanic before we can actually figure out how to create marketing around them? So that's the biggest thing is there's some people over here. So we're a product company. These peoples, they know we're trying to change the world. And these people say, No, no, no, we're all about the customer and the discussion that you have around that is actually the where the ah ha moment comes When you decide okay, we really are a customer focus company doesn't mean the other two things go away. They just take a back seat to the marketing. So everybody has to agree that that's what they're going to move forward with. And that's what makes it. It's so much fun. It's like it's like doing and Myers Briggs test for a company. You know, everybody loves that, right? Oh, I'm in I n t j M e. And whatever the >> letters it was, I'm not that I'm really something else, >> but there's always confident. But >> you >> also mentioned the book that people can change, too. So you start out as something. Maybe a missionary evolve based upon the business changed. Talk about that, >> Yeah. So let's talk about Apple >> for a second cause that's the company that definitely was a missionary, and missionaries exist to change behavior on a fundamental level. And that was what Steve Jobs was all about, right? So when >> he was >> running the company even before he was running it, but he was a big influence, or there he basically was a missionary company. He was trying to change behavior, and that's what the Macintosh was all about. But after he passed away, he left the assets of the company in the hands of Tim Cook, who, by the way, is an amazing, amazing caretaker of those assets. I mean, he's grown them. He's turned them into it, turned the company into one of the world's most valuable companies. But unfortunately, he's not a missionary, and what he has done is he has kind of tried to keep the missionary thing going. But he hasn't been successful doing that. So what's happened is the market is turning Apple into a product focus company, and the leadership is not steering the company that direction they are trailing, so it's happening to ample, in other words. So you're going to start to see Apple focus more on Warren product over the years, which they which they have been. But they're starting to have some product issues, and I think that's the result of them, not it's tearing the company directly into this, >> finding that DNA and get filling the young count or hiring people toe >> exactly. Exactly. >> Just on that same point. Amazon is a company that is doing this to the market. So Amazon started as a product company, and now they've steered their steering themselves purposefully into a customer focus company. And if you go online and check out their new mission statement, it's to be Earth's most customer centric company. And this is the reason Jeff Bezos bought Zappos a number of years ago Wasn't because Jeff couldn't figure out how to sell shoes online. Of course he could. It was because he was buying that customer centric culture, So he's purposefully steering the company into the customer direction so >> you can change your DNA, >> but it ain't easy. >> I've any Jesse. Many times become a good friend on the Cube as well. He's the word customer so many times we can see the frequency, but they've been talking customer for a long time. So you say they were product company >> with his Amazon. Amazon lands >> on Web services. The missionary and a product focus because I think product would be. I think it's safe once >> I think early, early, early >> on meaning they started this customer transition probably five, six years ago, so but they were very much early on a product company, I think in bases his head. They were actually a missionary. But he never he never would go out and say that. What did he say about Amazon? Were online bookseller and oh, by the way, books are going so well now we're going to do music, and now we're going to, you know. And then >> it's product. >> It took about its product. It was product product product until he decided that he was going to eat the universe one bite at a time. And so, in order to be successful with that, he has to have a customer he feels he has to have customer relationships that are going to stick with him over the course of a lifetime. >> So you know a little about the Cube. What's the Cube? What are we? >> I think you're a missionary. I mean, you're trying to change >> behavior on a fundamental level, and, you know it's, um it's amazing what you've done. You know, we had this great conversation beforehand, and I learned about all the new things you're working on, and it's groundbreaking, groundbreaking stuff. >> Okay, Final question on the book is the funniest. Our craziest reaction you've had to it, either someone emailing You owe our ceremonial because it's pretty inspiring. You break it down free simply. But it's really a core fundamental practice. And I've read a lot of marketing books in my day. A lot of you know, these office come out. Process improvement. This is cuts to the chase. It's >> really thank you. Thank you. What's the big waves >> you heard or crazy? >> Well, I this is This is the >> most recent thing I can think of. I I ended up becoming number number one on Amazon's e book thing and four categories, just like two weeks ago, and I got Mohr social media coverage on that than >> anything else in my entire life with the most amazing >> thing that I've ever seen in all these. Congratulations. And, you >> know, they're they're categories. >> Not like this. Not like your New York Times best seller. It's like you're the best multi marketing, you know, book here, The best small business marketing book, those kinds of things. And it just was just blew up. It went viral. >> That's how it was all online. What made you write the book was That was the moment. When was the ah ha moment for you saying, You know what? I got to put the book together. Was it something that you had in mind? That you get this data collecting of institutional knowledge of the trade? When was the ah, ha moment for you to write the book? >> Well, I this framework that I developed here has been working for me really successfully for, like, seventeen years. And I just decided that wow, other people should know how to do this. You know, because when we charge when we hired when that when we hire when someone hires us, it's like one hundred fifty thousand dollars worth of worth of work to do what we do, they could do it for twenty two ninety nine or whatever the heck >> this thing costs these days. And you could occasionally you get a book out there to get an audio book as well. So s so I really wanted >> to spread the word about this framework in this methodology, cause I really believe that my, my inside my core of myself, that the epicentre of great marketing is positioning. And if you don't get that right, you will never succeed with any of the rest of it. So do >> the great folks. You have a great track record. I've seen personal your sex success of up close perambulations on that. Let's talk about cos now I want to get backto successful companies. He's a lot of conversation. I'd build a rocket ship. So you we live in Silicon Valley. There are rocket >> ships that there are, >> you know, go big or go home. Blitz Scaling his Reid, Hoffman would say, I endorse that one hundred percent think there's use cases clearly for blitz scaling. Other people have been throwing him under the bus saying that culture is not what we want and build a still stable business. And so the debate aside, there's two types of companies there's the Okay, I'm going to build this company. I might not know when they're when the growth's gonna be there. And then there's the big venture back category changer rocket ships. Can you talk about the success criteria in your mind of both companies around positioning approaches, things that you've seen in the past that work well, >> I think companies that understand who they are and why they matter are the ones that succeed. And it's also important that they have a good leader, a good, strong leader. But if you don't know who you are and why you matter, you can't build a new category. You can't even launch a new product. So I, >> you know, take a look at some of the companies that have done that. Well, Netflix has done that extremely well, right? Airbnb has done that extreme slack has done that really well. Microsoft is doing it really well again, right? They went through a downtime, and now you know their new CEO, Satya Nadella, is doing an unbelievable job with positioning. There's so much a product company, and he's not trying to make them into a customer. Companies trying to double down on the product so and Netflix is a is a missionary company there change behaviour on a fundamental >> of Microsoft's a great example because I think that's something into anything radical. In the product side, they looked at the tailwind of Cloud computing an A I and said, Let's throw the sails up there and let's let's get around behind it >> and grand source. >> And then they branded it. So they positioned themselves as a Claude company, and then they branded it. As as you're so >>On the tail winds concept of trends, Pat Gelsinger said that if you're not out in front of that next wave, you could be driftwood. Riding the waves are certainly a big part of jumping on a successful or tail wind some call it how important that have that positioning time to something that's trendy or something. >> Oh, that's a great question, because it's because the context in which you are actually putting something into the market is critical. So you have to really understand what are the waves that you want to ride and can ride. And don't try to be riding a wave that passed five years ago. Or that hasn't shown up yet. You might think there's a wave coming. That's the biggest danger of a lot of these high tech start ups is that they see a vision of something way down the line, and there's no way for them to ride today. And they launched their technology. But too early >> and to your point. If they don't have the positioning right, they won't be able to ride it. You >> know what they want. They won't be able to ride it. So if they if if they did a proper positioning exercise before that, they would realize that they're context in which they're doing this is not right for what they're saying. So have to pivot a little bit. These is where pivots come from, right? We have to pivot a little bit to make yourself relevant for the market today, and that's an important thing. >> Andy. Final question for the folks watching saying, I love the book. I'm gonna get it might have helped might need help and saying I need to call Andy and the team or figure it out. What are some of the tell signs that they're not getting it right or what? If some things when they need to call for help and howto people moved to the next level, some people might say, Hey, you know, we need help. We can't get concensus. The leader might not be strong enough to be a leadership transition. Could be a new wave that people have identified. Yeah. What? This is a tough challenge of self awareness. What is that? Some of the tell signs And how does >> > somebody actually make the change? It is a tough, and most CEOs are not into it enough of themselves to know to know those things. So what happens is they launch it and then they don't get traction. So the biggest reason why people call me is they're not getting traction. Now, the really the really smart ones do more analysis, like what you're talking about. Oh, there's something has changed in the context. So I better shift this or, you know, a competitors come up with something that sounds awful on awful lot like ours. Maybe we better get ahead of that. But that takes a really strategic CEO. And there are some of those out there, But not everyone is >> okay. So great book here. Getting toe, huh? Everyone great. It's a good thing I read. It. Came out the day. Volante. He's reading it. Thanks for coming out. Spend the time, John communications. Final word on the communications world. What's the message to folks out there? See, M O's out there and head of communications. What's the future look like for them? What should they do? Going forward to be successful? >> Well, the future of marketing is is really figuring out how to make word of mouth, you know, explode word of mouth, because that's why people buy things. You know, you told me I should check out this product or my book. He said, You told your friends I should check out the books, So he does. So it's all about word of mouth and starts with building a big digital footprint yourself and then going to the peak to the press side. >> Andy cutting him here in Palo Alto Studios. I'm John for with Keep conversations. Thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
Oh, from our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley. of Cunning in collective and also the author of the book. Hey, it's great to be here. You've done so much in your career. And That you had a talk about the book on your firm for stuff about Connie and collected So the So the book tells you how to do it. Of all the news these days around how they sucked all the data in and fake And the she says to say what you want them to say before you actually say it yourself, You need to copy strategy because, you know, reach media, print ads and radio Because is that because of the targeting, is that because there's not a lot of reaches more specialized? But now it's so much easier because now you don't have to buy ads to do it. Put it together. It's like an Easter egg hunt. Well, here's a clip But before we do that, I got to ask you when I was watching the Steve You were very instrumental, hectic days, people who know Steve and know the apple days. That's in the book from the Apple days. And it's the same lesson people can learn today. And I think this is key to the book of one of the things that you mentioned earlier. thoughts on that Wise wise is so important, specific successes you had. Oh my God, you did all this first you didn't figure out your positioning strategy. the conflict involved when you work for the client or when you have to get to this moment. as a company is, and the book tells you how to determine what is your DNA. But So you start out as something. for a second cause that's the company that definitely was a missionary, and missionaries exist to change behavior on a fundamental But after he passed away, he left the assets of the company in the hands of Tim Cook, exactly. Amazon is a company that is doing this to the market. So you say they were with his Amazon. The missionary and a product focus because I think product would be. oh, by the way, books are going so well now we're going to do music, and now we're going to, you know. And so, in order to be successful with that, he has to have a customer So you know a little about the Cube. I think you're a missionary. behavior on a fundamental level, and, you know it's, um it's amazing what you've done. A lot of you know, these office come out. What's the big waves media coverage on that than And, you And it just was just blew When was the ah, ha moment for you to write the book? And I just decided that wow, other people should know how to do this. And you could occasionally you get a book out there to get an audio book as well. my inside my core of myself, that the epicentre of great marketing is So you we live in Silicon Valley. And so the And it's also important that they have a good leader, They went through a downtime, and now you know their new CEO, In the product side, they looked at the tailwind of Cloud So they positioned themselves as a Claude company, and then they branded it. important that have that positioning time to something that's trendy or something. Oh, that's a great question, because it's because the context in which you are actually putting something into the market is and to your point. So have to pivot a little bit. howto people moved to the next level, some people might say, Hey, you know, we need help. So the biggest reason why people It. Came out the day. Well, the future of marketing is is really figuring out how to make word I'm John for with Keep conversations.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eddie Bernays | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Satya Nadella | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Jobs | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Cunningham | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
February 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one hundred fifty thousand dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Airbnb | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tim Cook | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Angle Media Inc | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
seventeen years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Connie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Siri | TITLE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Macintosh | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
thirty five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two types | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New Channel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jesse | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Regis McKenna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six case studies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Myers Briggs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one book | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
De Anza College | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
twenty two ninety nine | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second thoughts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
both companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two weeks ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Childfree | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Steve Jobs | PERSON | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Zappos | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
about six months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second cause | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Ahamo | PERSON | 0.97+ |
New York Times | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
first part | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one hundred journalists | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Volante | PERSON | 0.96+ |
M O | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Palo ALTO, California | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
Claude | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
first radio print | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
six years ago | DATE | 0.93+ |
Warren | PERSON | 0.93+ |
a hundred years ago | DATE | 0.93+ |
around seventeen years ago | DATE | 0.91+ |
Paul Martino, Bullpen Capital | CUBEConversation, February 2019
(upbeat music) >> Welcome to this special Cube Conversation. We're here in Palo Alto, California with a special guest. Dialing in remotely Paul Martino, the founder of Bullpen Capital and also the producer of an upcoming film called The Inside Game. It's a story about a true story about an NBA betting scandal. It's really, it's got everything you want to know. It's got sports, it's got gambling, it's got fixing of games. Paul Martino, known for being a serial entrepreneur and then an investor, investing in some great growth companies, and now running his own firm called Bullpen Capital, which bets on high-growth companies and takes them to the next level. Paul, great to see you. Thanks for spending the time. Good to see you again. >> John, always good to see you. Thanks for having me on the show. >> So, you're a unique individual. You're a computer science whiz, investor, entrepreneur, now film producer. This story kind of crosses over your interests. Obviously in Philly, you're kind of like me, kind of a blue collar kind of guy. You know hot starters when you see it. You also were an investor in a lot of the sports, gambling, betting, kind of online games, we've talked about in the past. But now you're crossing over into filming movies. Which is, seems like very cool and obviously we're living in a date of digital media where code is software, code is content, obviously we believe that. What's this movie all about? All the buzz is out there, Inside Game. You get it on sports radio all the time. Give us the scoop. Why Inside Game? What's it about? Give us the 411. >> Yeah, so John, I mean, this is a story that picked me. My producing partner in this is a guy named Michael Pierce who made a bunch of great movies, including The Cooler, one of the best gambling movies, with William H Macy. And he says sometimes the movie picks you and sometimes you pick the movie. And I wasn't sitting around one day going wow I want to be a movie producer, it was just much more that my cousin is the principal in the story. My cousin was the go-between between the gambler and the referee. The three of them were friends ever since they were kids. And when they all got out of jail Tommy called me, Tommy Martino. He said hey Paulie, you're about the only legitimate business guy I know. Could you help me with my life rights? And that's how this started almost six years ago. >> And what progressed next? You sat down, had a couple cocktails, beers, said okay here's how we're going to structure it. Was it more brainstorming and then it kind of went from there? Take us through that progression. >> It was a pure intellectual property exercise, and this is where being a startup guy was helpful. I was like, Tommy, I'll buy your life rights. Maybe we'll get a script written, we'll put it on the shelf, so that if anybody ever wants to make this story they have to go through us. Almost like a blocking patent or a copyright. And he's like okay cool. And so I said I have no delusions of ever making this movie. I actually don't know that, I don't know anybody to make a movie. This is not my skill set. But if anybody ever wants to make the movie, they're going to have to come deal with us. And then the lucky break happens, like anything in a startup. I have this random meeting with a guy named Michael Pierce, who was at a firm called WPS Challenger out of London. And we're down in Hillstone in Santa Monica, and I say to him, I say I've got this script written about this NBA betting scandal, would you do me a favor? He literally laughs in my face. He goes a venture guy from Silicon Valley is going to hand me a script. What a bad, anyway, I was like look dude, I'm a good guy to have owe you a favor so just read this dang thing. About 8 hours later my phone rings, he says who the hell is Andy Callahan? This is the best script I've ever read in my entire life. Let's go make a movie. Andy Callahan was a friend of a friend from high school who wrote the script. He actually once beat Kobe Bryant when he was a center at Haverford when Kobe Bryant played at Lower Merion here in the Philly suburbs. So, it's kind of this local Philly story. I'm a local Philly blue collar guy, we put the pieces together, and I'll be danged and now six years later the film is in the can and you're probably going to see it during the NBA finals this year in June. >> All right, so there's some news out there it's on the cover on ESPN Magazine, the site is now launched. I've been hearing buzz all morning on this in the sports radio world. A lot of buzz, a lot of organic virality around it. Reminds of the Crazy, Rich Asians, which kind of started organically, similar kind of community behind it. This has really got some legs to it. Give us some taste of what's some of the latest organic growth here around the buzz. >> Yeah so, think about this. This happened in, primarily '06 and '07. They were sentenced in 2010 and were in jail in 2011. It is 2019 and the front page story on ESPN is What Tim, Tommy, and Jimmy Battista Did. Those were the three guys, the gambler, the ref, and the go-between. And this is a front page story on ESPN all these years later. So we know this story has tremendous legs. We know this movie has a tremendous built-in audience. And so now it's just our job to leverage all those marketing channels, places we pioneered, like Zynga and FanDuel to get people who care about the story into the theaters. And we're hoping we can really show people how to do a modern way to market a film using those channels we've pioneered at places like FanDuel and Zynga. >> You and I have had many conversations privately and here on the Cube in the past around startups disruption, and it's the same pattern right? No one thinks it's a great idea, you get the rights to it, and you kind of got to find that inflection point, that magical moment which comes through networking and just hard work and hustle. And then you've got everything comes together. And then it comes together. And then it grows. As the world changes, you're seeing digital completely change the game on Hollywood. For instance, Netflix, you've got Prime, you've got Hulu. This is, essentially, a democratization, I'm not saying, well first of all you've made some money so you had some dough to put into it, but here's a script from a friend. You guys put it together. This is now the new startup model going to Hollywood. Talk about that dynamic, what's your vision there? Because this, I think, is an important signal in how digital content, whether it's guys in the Cube doing stuff or Cube Studios, which we'll, we have a vision for. This is something that's real. Talk about the dynamic. How do you see the entrepeneurial vision around how movies are made, how content's made, and then, ultimately, how they're merchandised in the future. >> Right, there's a whole, there's a whole bunch of buckets. There's the intellectual property bucket of the story, the script, etc. Then there's the bucket of getting the movie made. You know, that's the on the set and that's the director and that's post-production, and then there's the marketing. And what was really interesting is even though I'd never made a movie, two of those three buckets I knew a tremendous amount about from my experience as a startup investor. The marketing and the IP side I understood almost completely, even though I'd never made a film. And so all of the disruptive technologies that we learn for doing disruptive things like marketing a new thing called Daily Fantasy Sports, we were able to bring to bear to this film. Now, I had fun on the set and meeting all the actors, etc. But I had no delusion that I knew about the making of the movie part. So I plead ignorance there, but of the three buckets that you need to go make something in the media space 66% of what I knew as a startup guy overlapped and I think this is what the future of the media is. Because guys like me and you, John, we actually know a lot about this because we're startup people as opposed to we have to learn about it in terms of how to market and how to get an audience. I mean, my last company Aggregate Knowledge designs custom audiences for ad targeting. So we know how to find gamblers to go see this movie. That's literally the company I started. And so that's a thing that I'm very, very comfortable with and it's exciting to then work with the producer who did the creative and the director and I say hey guys, I've got this marketing thing under control, I know how to do it, oh by the way, the old Head of Marketing from FanDuel, he's a consultant to the project. Right, so, we got that. >> You got that, and the movie's being made. That's also again, back to entrepreneurship, risk. You got to take risks, right? This is all about risk management at the end of the day and you know, navigating as the lead entrepreneur, getting it done, there's heavy lifting and costs involved in making the movie, >> Right >> How did you, that's like production, right? You got to build a product. That is ultimately the product when it has to get to market. How did that go, what's your thoughts on your first time running a movie like this, from a production standpoint, learnings, observations? >> I learned a tremendous amount. I must admit, I was along for the ride on that piece of the puddle, puzzle. The product development piece of this was all new to me. But then again, I mean think about it, John, I started four companies, a social network, an ad targeting company, a game company, and a security company. I didn't know anything about those four companies when I started them either in terms of what the product needed to do. So learning a new product called make a movie was kind of par for the course, even though I didn't really know anything about it. You know, if you're going to be a startup person you got to have no fear. That's the real attribute you need to have in these kinds of situations. >> So I got to >> And so, witnessed that first-hand and, you know what, now, if I ever make a movie again I kind of know how to make that product. >> Yeah, well looking forward. You've got great instincts as an entrepreneur. I love hanging out with you. I got to ask you a question. I talk to a lot of young people, my son and his friends and I see people coming out of business school, all this stuff. You know, every college has an entrepreneurial program. Music, film, you know, whatever, they all have kind of bolted on entrepreneurship. You're essentially breaking down that kind of dogma of that you have to have a discipline. Anyone can do this, right? So talk about the folks that are out there, trying to be entrepreneurial, whether you're a musician. This is direct to consumer. If you have skills as an entrepreneur it translates. Talk about what it takes to be an entrepreneur, if you're a musician or someone who has, say, content rights or has content story. What do they do? What's your advice? >> We have lived through, perhaps the most awesome period of the last five to 10 years, where it got cheap to do a startup. You know, when we're doing our first startups 20 years ago, it cost 5 million bucks to go get a license from Oracle and go hire a DBA and do all that stuff. You know what, for 5 grand you can get your website up, you can build, you can use your iPhone, you can film your movie. That's all happened in the last five to 10 years. And what it's done is exactly the word you used. It's democratized who can become an entrepreneur. Now people who never thought entrepreneurship was for them, are able to do it. One of our great examples of this is Ipsy, our cosmetics company. You know, Michelle Phan was a cocktail waitress working in Florida, but she had this YouTube following around watching her videos of her putting her makeup on. And you know when we met her, we're like you know what? You're the next generation of what entrepreneurs look like. Because no, she didn't go to Stanford. She didn't have a PhD in computer science, but she knew what this next generation of content marketing was going to look like. She knew what it was to be a celebrity influencer. You know, that company Ipsy makes hundreds of millions of dollars every year now, and I don't think most people on Sand Hill would've necessarily given Michelle the chance because she didn't look like what the traditional entrepreneur looked like. So it's so cool we live in a time where you don't need to look like what you think an entrepreneur needs to look like or went to the school you had to think you'd go to to become an entrepreneur. It's open to everybody now. >> And the key to success, you know, again, we've talked about those privately all the time when we meet, but I want to get your comment on the record here. But I mean, there's some basic blocking and tackling that's independent of where you went to school that's being creative, networking, networking, networking, you know, and being, good hustle. And being, obviously good judgment and being smart. Do your thoughts on the keys to success for as those folks saying hey you know I didn't have to go to these big, fancy schools. I want to go out there. I want to test my idea. I want to go push the envelope. I want to go for it. What's the tried and true formula from your perspective? >> So when you're in the early stage of hustling and you want to figure out if you're good at being an entrepreneur, I tell entrepreneurs this all the time. Every meeting is a job interview. Now, you might not think it's a job interview, but you want to think about every meeting, this might be the next person I start my company with. This might be the person I end up hiring to go run something at my company. This might be the person I end up getting money for, from to start my company. And so show up, have some skills, have some passion, have a vision, and impress the person on the other side of the table. Every once in a while I get invited to a college and they're like well Paul, life's easy for you, you started a company with Mark Pinkus and you're friend with Reid Hoffman and this... Well how the hell do you think I met those people? I did the same thing I'm telling you to do. When I was nobody coming out of school, I went and did stuff for these guys. I helped them with a business plan. I wrote the code of Tribe, and then now all of the sudden we've got a whole network of people you can go to. Well, that didn't happen by accident. You had to show up and have some skills, talent, and passion and then impress the person on the other side of the table. >> Yeah >> And guess what? If you do that enough times in a row, you're going to end up having your own network. And then you're going to have kids come in and say, wow, how can I impress you? >> Be authentic, be genuine, hustle, do networking, do the job interview, great stuff. All right, back to final point I want to get your thoughts on because I think this is your success and getting this movie out of the gate. Everyone, first, everyone should go see Inside Game. Insidegamemovie.com is the URL. The site just went up. This should be a great movie. I'm looking forward to it, and knowing the work that went in, I followed your journey on this. It should be great. I'm looking forward to seeing it. Uh, digital media, um, your thoughts because we're seeing a direct to consumer model. You've got the big companies, YouTube, Amazon, others. There's kind of a, a huge distribution of those guys. The classic Web 2.0 search kind of paradigm and portal. But now you've got a whole 'nother set of distribution or network effects. Your thoughts, because you were involved in, again, social networking before it became the monster that it is now. How is digital media changing? What's your vision of how that's happening and how does someone jump on that wave and be successful? >> Yeah, we're in the midst of disruption. I mean, I'm in the discussions and final negotiations right now on how we're going to end up ultimately doing the film distribution. And I am very disappointed with the quality of the thinking of the people on the other side of the table. Because they come from very traditional backgrounds. And I'm talking to them about, I want to do a site takeover across Zynga. I want to do a digital download on FanDuel of a 20 minute clip of the film. And they're like what's FanDuel? Who's Zynga? And I'm sitting there, I'm like guys, this is the new media. Oh, by the way, there's a sports app called Wave and Wave is where the local influencers in the markets who want to write the stories are, and we want to do a deal with those guys. And oh, by the way, the CEO of that company is a buddy of mine I met years ago, right? One of those kids I gave advice to, and now I'm going to ask him for a favor from, right, that's how it works. But, it's amazing when you have these conversations with traditional old line media companies. They don't understand any of the words coming out of your mouth. They're like Paul, here's how much I'll give you for your film. Thank you, we'll go market it. I'm like, really? Seriously? I got the former CMO of FanDuel going to help out on this. You don't want to talk to him? >> Yeah >> And so this is where the industry is really ripe for disruption. Because the people from the startup world have already disrupted the apple cart and now we've just got to demonstrate that this model is going to continue to work for the future and be ready when the next new kind of digital transmedia thing comes along and embrace that, as opposed to be scared to death of it or not even know how to talk the language of the people on it. >> Well, you're doing some amazing venturing in your, kind of, unique venture capital model on Bullpen Capital. Certainly isn't your classic venture capital thing, so I'm sure people are going to be talking to you about oh, Paul, are all VCs going to be doing movies? I'm sure that's a narrative that's out there. But you're not just a normal venture capital. You certainly invest. So, venture capitals have reputation issues right now. People talk about, well, you know, they're group think. You know, they only invest in who they see themselves. You mentioned that comment there. The world's changing in venture. Your thoughts on that, how you guys started your firm, and your evolution of venture capital. And is this a sign that you'll see venture capitalists go into movies? >> Well, I don't know about that part. There have been a couple venture people who have done movies. But the part I will talk about is the you got to know somebody, it's an inside game, ha ha, we'll play double entendre on Inside Game here. You know, 20% of the deal we've done at Bullpen, we've done over 100. 20% of them were cold emails on something like LinkedIn or business plans at bullpen.com. 20%, now there's this old trope in venture if you don't get a warm intro I won't even talk to you. Well 20% of our deals came in and we had no idea who the person on the other side was. That's how we run the firm. And so if you're out there going I'm one of those entrepreneurs in the Midwest and no one, I don't know anyone. I'm not in a network, send me a plan. I'm someone who's going to look at it. It doesn't mean I'm going to be an investor, but you know what I'm going to do? I'm going to give you a shot. And I don't care where you're from or what school you went to or what social clique you're in or what your political persuasion is. Matter of fact, I literally don't care. I'm going to give you a shot. Come into my office and that, I think, is what was missing in a lot of firms, where it's a we only do security and we only look at companies that spun out of Berkeley and Stanford. And yeah, there can be an old boys network in that. But you know what, we like to talk to everybody. And the more blue collar the CEO is, the more we love them at Bullpen. >> That's awesome. Talk about the movie real quick on terms of how Hollywood's handling it. Um, expectations, in terms of reaction, was it positive, is it positive, what's the vibe going on in Hollywood, is this going to be a grassroots kind of thing around the FanDuels and your channels? What's your plan for that and what's the reaction of Hollywood? >> So it's going to be a lot of all of the above. But PR is going to be a huge component, I mean, part of the reason we're on today is there's a huge front page story on ESPN about Tim Donaghy and the NBA betting scandal of 2007. And so the earned media is going to be a huge component of this. And I think this is where the Hollywood people do understand the language we're speaking. We're like, look, we have a huge built-in audience that we know how to market to. We have a story. Actually, in the early days, you asked about risk? Back when I was thinking about if I would do this project I would do the following little market research. I'd walk into a sports bar, it didn't matter what town I was in. I could be in Dallas, I could be in Houston, I could be in Boston. I would literally walk up to the bar and say, hey, uh, six of you at the bar, ever hear of Tim Donaghy? It'd be amazing. About seven out of 10 people would go yeah he was the referee, crooked referee in the NBA. I'm like, this is amazing. Seven out of 10 people I meet in a bar know about the story I want to go tell. That sounds like a good chance to make a movie, as opposed to a movie that has no built-in audience. And so, a built-in audience with PR channels that we know work, I think we can really show Hollywood how to do this in a different way if this all works. >> And this comes back to my point around built-in audiences. You know, YouTube has got a million subscribers. That's kind of an old metric. That means they, like an RSS feed kind of model. That's a million people that are, could be, amplifying their network connections. It is a massive built-in audience. The iteration, the DevOps kind of mindset, we talk about cloud computing, can be applied to movies. It's agile movie making. That's what you're talking about. >> Yeah, and by the way, so we have a social network of all the actors and people in the film. So when it's ready, let's go activate our network of all the actors that are in the film. Each of them have a couple million followers. So let's go be smart. Let's, two weeks before the movie, let's send some screenshots. A week before the movie let's show some exclusive videos. Two days before the film, go see it, it's now out in the theaters. You know what, that's pretty, that's 101. We've got actors. We've got producers. Like, let's go use the influencer network we built that actually got the movie made. Let's go on Sports Talk, talk about the movie. Let's go on places like this and talk about how a venture guy made a movie. This is the confluence of all of the pieces all coming together at once. And I just don't think enough people in the film business or in the media business think big enough about going after these audiences. It's oh, we're going to take ads out on TV and I'm going to see my trailer and we're going to do this and that's how we do it. There's so many better ways to get your audience now. >> And this is going to change, just while I've got you here, it's just awesome, awesome conversation. Bringing it back to kind of the CMO in big companies, whether it's consumer or B to B or whatever, movies, the old model of here's our channels. There's certainly this earned media kind of formula and it's not your classic we've got a website, we're going to do all this instrumentation, it's a whole 'nother mechanism. So talk about, in your opinion, the importance of earned media, vis a vis the old other buckets. Owned media, paid media, well-defined Web 1.0, Web 2.0 tactics, earned media is not just how good is our PR? It's actually infrastructure channels, it's networks, a new kind of way to do things. How relevant and how important will this be going forward? Because there's no more website. It's a, you're basically building a media company for this movie. >> That is exactly right. We're building an ad hoc media business. I think this is what the next generation of digital agencies are going to look like. And there are some agencies that we've talked to that really understand all of what you've just said. They are few and far between, unfortunately. >> Yeah, well, Paul, this was theCube. We love talking to people, making it happen. Again, our model's the same as yours. We're open to anyone who's got signal, and you certainly are doing a great job and great to know you and follow your entrepreneur journey, your investment journey, and now your film making journey. Paul Martino, General Pen on Bullpen Capital, with the hot film Inside Game. I'm definitely going to see it. It should be really strong and it's going to be one of those movies like Crazy, Rich Asians, where not looking, not really well produced, I mean not predicted to be great and then goes game buster so I think this is going to be one of those examples. Paul, thanks for coming on. >> Love it, thank you! >> This Cube Conversation, I'm John Furrier here in Palo Alto, California, bringing ya all the action. Venture capitalist turned film maker Paul Martino with the movie Inside Game. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (triumphant music)
SUMMARY :
and also the producer of an upcoming film Thanks for having me on the show. in a lot of the sports, And he says sometimes the movie picks you going to structure it. I'm a good guy to have owe you a favor Reminds of the Crazy, Rich Asians, It is 2019 and the and here on the Cube in the past but of the three buckets that you need and costs involved in making the movie, You got to build a product. That's the real attribute you need to have I kind of know how to make that product. I got to ask you a question. period of the last five to 10 years, And the key to success, you know, Well how the hell do you And then you're going to and knowing the work that went in, of the people on the of the people on it. to be talking to you about You know, 20% of the deal is this going to be a And so the earned media is going to be And this comes back to my point of all the actors and people in the film. And this is going to change, I think this is what the next generation and great to know you and follow your here in Palo Alto, California,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Michelle Phan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Pierce | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Martino | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2011 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tim Donaghy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tommy Martino | PERSON | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Callahan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zynga | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
William H Macy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paulie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bullpen Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Houston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dallas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tommy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michelle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
WPS Challenger | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kobe Bryant | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Santa Monica | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
FanDuel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three guys | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
20 minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
February 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
The Inside Game | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
66% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bullpen | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Inside Game | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mark Pinkus | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ipsy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Hillstone | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hulu | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
hundreds of millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
'07 | DATE | 0.99+ |
ESPN | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
'06 | DATE | 0.99+ |
three buckets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Daily Fantasy Sports | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Hollywood | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Aggregate Knowledge | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
a million people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ | |
The Cooler | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Jerry Chen, Greylock | AWS re:Invent 2018
>> Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE! Covering AWS re:Invent 2018. Brought to you by Amazon web services, Intel, and their ecosystem partners. >> Hey welcome back everyone, here at AWS re:Invent 2018, their sixth year of theCUBE coverage, two sets wall-to-wall coverage here, two more sets in other locations, getting all the content, bringing it in, ingesting it into our video cloud service on AWS, ah, Dave, >> Lot of content, John. >> Lot of people don't know that we have that video cloud service, but we're going to have a lot of fun, ton of content, ton of stories, and a special analyst segment, Jerry Chen, guest here today, CUBE alumni, famous Venture Capitalist and Greylock partners, partnering with Reid Hoffman, the founder of LinkedIn, great set of partners at Greylock , great firm, tier one, doing a lot of great deals, Rockset, recent one. >> Thanks, yeah. >> You're also, on the record, these six years ago, calling the shot of Babe Ruth predicting the future. You've got a good handle on, you've got VM where you have the cloud business, now you're making investments, you're seeing a lot of stuff on the landscape, certainly, as a Venture Capitalist, you're funding projects, what better time now of innovation to actually put money to work, to hit market share, and then the big guys are getting bigger, they're creating more robust platforms, game is changing big-time, want to get your perspective, Dave, so, Jerry, what's your take on the announcements, slew of announcements, which ones jumped out at you? >> I think there's kind of two or three areas, there's definitely the hybrid cloud story with the Outpost, there's a bunch of stuff around ML and AI services, and a bunch of stuff on data and storage, and for me I think what they're doing around the ML services, the prediction, the personalization, the text OCR, what Amazon's doing at that app layer is now creating AI building blocks for modern application, so you want to do forecasts, you want to do personalization, you want to do text analysis, you have a simple API to basically build these modern apowered apps, he's doing to the app infrastructure layer what he's done to the cloud infrastructure layer, by deconstructing these services. >> And API is also the center, that's what web services are, so question for you is, do you see that the core cloud players, Aussie, Amazon, Bigly, Google, Microsoft, others, it's a winner take most, you called that six years ago, and that's true, but as they grow there's going to be now a new cloudification going on for business apps, new entrepreneurs coming to market, who's vulnerable, who wins, who loses, as this evolution continues because it's going to enable a lot of opportunity. >> Yeah, well I mean Amazon in cloud in general is going to create a lot of winners and losers, like you said, so I think you have a shift of dollars from on prem and old legacy vendors, databay storage, compute, to the cloud, so I think there's a shift of dollars, there are winner and losers, but I think what's going to happen is, with all these services around AI, ML, and Cloud as a distribution model, a lot of applications are going to be rebuilt. So I think that the entire application stack from all the big SaaS players to small SaaS companies, you're going to see this kind of a long tale of new SaaS applications being built on top of the Cloud that you didn't see in the past. >> And the ability to get to markets faster, so the question I have for you is, if you're an entrepreneur out there, looking for funding and I can to market quicker, what's the playbook, and two, Jassie talked on stage about a new persona, a new kind of developer, one that can rethink and reimagine and reinvent something that someone else has already done, so if you're an entrepreneur, you got to think to take someone else's territory, so how does an entrepreneur go out and identify whose lunch to eat, so if I want to take down a company, I got to have a strategy, how do I use the cloud to >> I think it's always a combination when a founder in a thing attacks your market it's a combination of where are the dollars, where can I create some advantage IP or advantage angle, and thirdly where do I have a distribution advantage, how can I actually get my product in the hands of the users differently? And so I think those are the three things, you find intersection of a great market, you have a unique angle, and you have a unique route to market, then you have a powerful story. So, you think about cloud changing the game, think about the mobile app you can consist of, for consumers, that is also a new platform, a new distribution method, the mobile app stores, and so what happened, you had a new category of developers, mode developers, creating this long tale, a thousand thousand apps, for everything from groceries to cars to your Fantasy Football score. So I think you're going to see distribution in the cloud, making it easy to get your apps out there, going to see a bunch of new markets open up, because we're seeing verticals like healthcare, construction, financial services, that didn't have special apps beforehand, be disrupted with technology. Autodesk just bought PlanGrid for 800 million dollars, I mean that's unheard of, construction software company. So you can see a bunch of new inverdics like that be opened up, and then I think with this cloud technology, with compute storage network becomes free and you have this AI layer on top of it, you can power these new applications using AI, that I think is pretty damn exciting. >> Yes, you described this sort of, we went from client server to the cloud, brought a whole bunch of new app providers, obviously Salesforce was there but Workday, Service Now, what you described is a set of composeable digital services running on top of a cloud, so that's ripe for disruption, so do I have to own my own data centers if I'm big SaaS company, what happens to those big guys? >> I don't think you have to, well, you don't have to own your own data center as a company, but you could if you wanted to, right, so at some point in scale, a lot of big players build their own data centers, like AirBNB is on Amazon, but Dropbox built their own storage on Amazon early, then their own data center later. Uber has their own data center, right, so you can argue that at some point of scale it makes sense to build your own, so you don't need to be on Amazon or Google as your start, but it does give you a head start. Now the question is, in the future, can you build a SaaS application entirely on Amazon, Azure, or Google, without any custom code, right, can you hide read write call private SaaS, like a single instance of my SaaS application for you, John, or for you, Dave, that's your data, your workflow, your information personalized for you, so instead of this multi-tenet CRM system like Salesforce, I have a custom CRM system just for Dave, just for Jeff, just for Jerry, just for theCUBE, right? >> I think yes, for that, I think that's definitely a trend I would see happening. >> It's what Infor is trying to do, right, Charles Phillips says "Friends don't let friends "build data centers," but they've still got a big loss in legacy there, but it's an interesting model, focused on verticals or microverticals or like the healthcare example that you're giving, and lot of potential for something. >> Well here's why I think I like this because, I think, and I said this before in theCUBE maybe it's not the best way to say it is that, if you look at the benefit of AI, data-driven, the quality of the data and the power of the compute has to be there. AI will work well with all that stuff, but it's also specialized around the application's use case. So you have specialism around the application, but you don't have to build a full stack to do that, you could use a horizontally scalable cloud distribution system in your word, and then only create custom unique workloads for the app, where machine learning's involved, and AI, that's unique to the app, that's differentiation, that could be the business model, or the utility. So, multitenancy could exist in theory, at the scalable level, but unique at the top of the level so yes I would say I'd want that hosted in the most customized, agile, flexible way. So I would argue that that's the scenario. >> I think that's the future, I mean one of my, I think you were saying, Dave, friends don't let friends build data centers anymore, it's you probably don't need to build a data center anymore because you can actually build your own application on top of one of the two or three large cloud providers. So it's interesting to see what happens the next three, four years, we're going to see kind of a thousand flowers bloom of different apps, not everyone's going to make it, not everyone's going to be a huge Salesforce-like outcome, but there'll be a bunch of applications out there. >> And the IoT stuff is interesting to me, so observing a lot of what the IT guys are doing, it reminds me of people trying to make the Windows mobile phone, they're just trying to force IT standards down the IoT, what I've seen from AWS today is more of a bottoms up approach, build applications for operations technology people, which I think is the right way to go, what do you see in an IoT, IoT apps, what's the formula there? >> I think what Amazon announced today with their time series database, right, their Timestream prediction engine, plus their Outpost offering with the Vmware themselves, you're really seeing a combination of IoT and Edge, right, it's the whole idea is, one, there's a bunch of use cases for time series in IoT, because sentry data, cameras, self-driving cars, drones, et cetera, there's more data coming at you, it adds all of that. >> And Splunk has proven that big-time. >> Correct, Splunk's let 18 billion Marcap company, all on time series data, but number two, what's happening is, it's not necessarily centralized data, right, it's happening at the edge, your self-driving car, your cell phone, et cetera, so Outpost is really a way for Amazon to get closer to the edge, by pushing their compute towards your data center, towards remote office, branch office, and get closer to where the data is, so I think that'll be super interesting. >> Well the Elastic Inference engine is critical, now we got elasticity around inference, and then they got the chip set that worked Inferentia, that can work with the elastic service. That's a powerful combination. >> The AI plumbing war between Google and TetraFlow as technology there's like PyTorch, Google TPUs versus what Amazon is doing with inference chips today, versus what I'm sure Microsoft and else is doing, is fascinating to watch in terms of how you had a kind of a Intel Nvidia duopoly for a long time, and now you have Intel, Nvidia, and then everyone from Amazon, Google, Microsoft doing their own soul again, it's pretty fascinating to watch. >> What was the stat, he said 85% of the TensorFlow, cloud TensorFlow's running on AWS? >> Makes a lot of sense, I think he said Aurora's customers logoslide doubled, but let's break down real quick, to end the segment with the key areas that we see going on, at least my perspective, I want to get your reaction. Storage, major disruption, he emphasized a lot of that in the keynote, spent a lot of time on stores, actually I think more than EC2 if you look at it, two, databases, database war, storage rate configuration, and a holy trinity of networking, storage, and compute, that's evolving, databases, SageMaker, machine learning. All there and then over the top, yesterday's announcement of satellite as a service, that essentially kills the edge of the network, cause there is no edge if we have space satellites shooting connectivity to any device the world is now, there's no more edge, it's everywhere. So, your thoughts, those areas. Which one pops out as the most surprising or most relevant? >> I think it's consistent Amazon strategy, on the lowest layer they're trying to draw the cost to zero, so on storage, cheaper cheaper cheaper, they're driving the bottom layer to zero to get all your data. I think the second thing, the database layer, it makes sense, it's not open-source, right, time scale or time series, it's not, Timestream's not their open-source database, it's their own, so open-source, low cost, the lowest layer, their database stuff is mostly their own, Aurora, Dynamo, Timestream, right, because there's some level lock in there, which I think customers are worried about, so that's clever, it's not by accident, that's all proprietary, and then ML Services, on top of that, that's all cares with developers, and it's API locking, so clearly low-cost open-source for the bottom, proprietary data services that they're trying to own, and then API's on top of it. And so the higher up in the stack, the more and more Amazon, you look, the more and more Amazon you have to adopt as kind of a lock in stack, so it's a brilliant strategy the guys have been executing for the past six, seven years as you guys have seen firsthand, I think the most exciting thing, and the most shocking thing to me is this move towards this battle for the AI front, this ML AI front, I think we saw ML's the new sequel, right, that's the new war, right, against Amazon, Google, and Microsoft. >> And that's the future of applications, cause this is >> But you're right on, it's a knife fight for the data, and then you layer on machine intelligence on top of that, and you get cloud scale, and that's the innovation engine for the next 10 years. >> Alright Jerry Chen just unpacked the State of the Union of cloud, of course as an investor I got to ask the final question, how are you investing to take advantage of this wave, versus being on the wrong side of history? >> I have framers for everything, there's a framer on how to attack the cloud vendors, and so I'm looking at a couple things, one, a seams in between the clouds, right, or in between services, because they can't do everything well, and there were kind of these large continents, Amazon, Google, Azure, so I'm looking for seams between the three of them, I'm looking for two, deep areas of IP that they're not going into that you actually have proprietary tap, and then verticals of data, like source of the data, or workflows that these guys aren't great, and then finally kind of cross-data cross-cloud solution, so, something that gives you the ability to run on prem, off prem, Microsoft, Google, Azure. >> Yeah, fill in the white spaces, there are big white spaces, and then hope that could develop into, good. Jerry Chen, partner in Greylock , partners formerly Vmware part of the V Mafia, friend of theCUBE, great guest analysis here, with Dave Vellante and John Furrier, thanks for watching us, stay with us, more live coverage, day two of three days of wall-to-wall coverage at re:Invent, 52,000 people, the whole industry's here, you can see the formations, we're getting all of the data, we're bringing it to you, stay with us.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Amazon web services, Lot of people don't know that we have that video cloud You're also, on the record, these six years ago, you have a simple API to basically build these modern And API is also the center, that's what web services are, so I think you have a shift of dollars from on prem and so what happened, you had a new category I don't think you have to, well, I think yes, for that, I think that's or like the healthcare example that you're giving, and the power of the compute has to be there. anymore because you can actually build your own of IoT and Edge, right, it's the whole idea is, it's happening at the edge, your self-driving car, Well the Elastic Inference engine is critical, for a long time, and now you have Intel, Nvidia, and then actually I think more than EC2 if you look at it, the more and more Amazon you have to adopt and then you layer on machine intelligence on top of that, that you actually have proprietary tap, you can see the formations, we're getting all of the data,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jerry Chen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Charles Phillips | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dropbox | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jassie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nvidia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Reid Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jerry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bigly | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
800 million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Venture Capitalist | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Greylock | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
two more sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Autodesk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
18 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
sixth year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
85% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
EC2 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ton of stories | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
ton of content | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
52,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Vmware | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Marcap | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Outpost | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
six years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Greylock | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Fantasy Football | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Azure | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Aussie | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |