Sarvesh Sharma, Dell Technologies & John McCready, Dell Technologies | MWC Barcelona 2023
(gentle upbeat music) >> Announcer: theCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies. Creating technologies that drive human progress. (bright upbeat music) >> We're back in Barcelona at the Fira. My name is Dave Vellante. I'm here with David Nicholson. We're live at MWC23, day four of the coverage. The show is still rocking. You walk the floor, it's jamming. People are lined up to get in the copter, in the right. It's amazing. Planes, trains, automobiles, digitization of analog businesses. We're going to talk private wireless here with Dell. Sarvesh Sharma, the Global Director for Edge and Private Mobility Solutions practice at Dell. And John McCready is a Senior Director for 5G Solutions and product management at Dell Technologies. Guys, good to see you. >> Likewise, likewise. >> Good to see you too. >> Private wireless. It's the buzz of the show. Everybody's talking about it. What's Dell's point of view on that? >> So Dell is, obviously, interested entering the private wireless game, as it's a good part of the overall enterprise IT space. As you move more and more into the different things. What we announced here, is sort of our initial partnerships with some key players like Airspan and expedo and AlphaNet. Players that are important in the space. Dell's going to provide an overall system integration solution wrap along with our Edge BU as well. And we think that we can bring really good solutions to our enterprise customers. >> Okay, I got to ask you about AlphaNet. So HPE pulled a little judo move they waited till you announced your partnership and then they bought the company. What, you know, what's your opinion on that? You going to, you going to dump AlphaNet, you're going to keep 'em? >> No. >> We're open Ecosystem. >> Yeah, it's an open ecosystem. We announce these are our initial partners, you know we're going to announce additional partners that was always the case. You know, there's a lot of good players in this space that bring different pros and cons. We got to be able to match the solution requirements of all our customers. And so we'll continue to partner with them and with others. >> Good, good answer, I like that. So some of these solutions are sort of out of the box, others require more integration. Can you talk about your, the spectrum of your portfolio? >> So I'm glad you brought up the integration part, right? I mean, if you look at private wireless, private mobility it is not a sell by itself. At the end of the day what the enterprise wants is not just private mobility. They're looking for an outcome. Which means from an integration perspective, you need somebody who can integrate the infrastructure stack. But that's not enough. You need somebody who can bring in the application stack to play and integrate that application stack with the enterprises IT OT. And that's not enough. You need somebody to put those together. And Dell is ideally suited to do all of this, right? We have strong partners that can bring the infrastructure stack to play. We have a proven track record of managing the IT and the enterprise stack. So we are very excited to say, "Hey, this is the sweet spot for us. And if there was a right to win the edge, we have it." >> Can you explain, I mean, people might be saying, well, why do I even need private wireless? I got Wi-Fi. I know it's kind of a dumb question for people who are in the business, but explain to folks in the audience who may not understand the intersection of the two. >> So, yeah, so I think, you know, wireless is a great techno- pardon me, Wi-Fi is a great technology for taking your laptop to the conference room. You know, it's effectively wireless LAN Where private 5G and before that private LTE had come into play is where there's a number of attributes of your application, what you're using it for, for which Wi-Fi is not as well suited. And so, you know, that plays out in different verticals in different ways. Either maybe you need a much higher capacity than Wi-Fi, better security than Wi-Fi, wider coverage like outdoor, and in many cases a more predictable reliability. So cellular is just a different way of handling the wireless interface that provides those attributes. So, you know, I think at the beginning, the first several years, you know Wi-Fi and 5G are going to live side by side in the enterprise for their different roles. How that plays out in the long term? We'll see how they each evolve. >> But I think anybody can relate to that. I mean, Wi-Fi's fine, you know, we have our issues with Wi-Fi. I'm having a lot of issues with Wi-Fi this week, but generally speaking, it works just fine. It's ubiquitous, it's cheap, okay. But I would not want to run my factory on it and rely on it for my robots that are shipping products, right? So that really is kind of the difference. It's really an industry 4.0 type. >> Yeah, exactly. So I mean, manufacturing's an important vertical, but things of energy and mining and things like that they're all outdoor, right? So you actually need the scale that comes, with a higher power technology, and even, you know just basic things like running cameras in a retail store and using AI to watch for certain things. You get a much better latency performance on private 5G and therefore are able to run more sophisticated applications. >> So I could be doing realtime inference. I can imagine Dave, I got an arm processor I'm doing some realtime inference AI at the Edge. You know, you need something like 5G to be able to do that, you can't be doing that over Wi-Fi. >> Yeah >> You nailed it. I mean that's exactly the difference, right? I mean if you look at Wi-Fi, it grow out from a IT enabled mode, right? You got to replace an ethernet. It was an IT extension. A LAN extension. Cellular came up from the mode of, "Hey, when I have that call, I need for it to be consistent and I need for it to be always available," right? So it's a different way of looking at it. Not to say one is better, the other is not better. It's just a different philosophy behind the technologies and they're going to coexist because they meet diverse needs. >> Now you have operators who embrace the idea of 5G obviously, and even private 5G. But the sort of next hurdle to overcome for some, is the idea of open standards. What does the landscape look like right now in terms of those conversations? Are you still having to push people over that hump, to get them beyond the legacy of proprietary closed stacks? >> Yeah, so I think I look, there are still people who are advocating that. And I think in the carrier's core networks it's going to take a little longer their main, you know macro networks that they serve the general public. In the private network though, the opportunity to use open standard and open technology is really strong because that's how you bring the innovation. And that's what we need in order to be able to solve all these different business problems. You know, the problems in retail, and healthcare and energy, they're different. And so you need to be able to use this open stack and be able to bring different elements of technology and blend it together in order to serve it. Otherwise we won't serve it. We'll all fail. So that's why I think it's going to have a quicker path in private. >> And the only thing to add to that is if you look at private 5G and the deployment of private LTE or private 5G, right? There is no real technology debt that you carry. So it's easy for us to say, "Hey, the operators are not listening, they're not going open." But hey, they have a technical debt, they have 2G, 3G, 4G, 5G, systems, right? >> Interviewer: Sure. >> But the reason we are so excited about private 5G and private 4G, is right off the bat when we go into an enterprise space, we can go open. >> So what exactly is Dell's role here? How do you see, obviously you make hardware and you have solutions, but you got to open ecosystems. You got, you know, you got labs, what do you see your role in the ecosystem? Kind of a disruptor here in this, when I walk around this show. >> Well a disruptor, also a solution provider, and system integrator. You know, Sarvesh and I are part of the telecom practice. We have a big Edge practice in Dell as well. And so for this space around private 5G, we're really teamed up with our cohort in the Edge business unit. And think about this as, it's not just private 5G. It's what are you doing with it? That requires storage, it requires compute, it requires other applications. So Dell brings that entire package. There definitely are players who are just focused on the connectivity, but our view is, that's not enough. To ask the enterprise to integrate that all themself. I don't think that's going to work. You need to bring the connectivity and the application to storage compute the whole solution. >> Explain Telecom and and Edge. They're different but they're like cousins in the Dell organization. Where do you guys divide the two? >> You're saying within Dell? >> Yeah, within Dell. >> Yeah, so if you look at Dell, right? Telecom is one of our most newest business units. And the way it has formed is like we talk Edge all the time, right? It's not new. Edge has always been around. So our enterprise Edge has always been around. What has changed with 5G is now you can seamlessly move between the enterprise Edge and the telecom Edge. And for that happen you had to bring in a telecom systems business unit that can facilitate that evolution. The next evolution of seamless Edge that goes across from enterprise all the way into the telco and other places where Edge needs to be. >> Same question for the market, because I remember at Dell Tech World last year, I interviewed Lowe's and the discussion was about the Edge. >> John: Yep. >> What they're doing in their Edge locations. So that's Edge. That's cool. But then I had, I had another discussion with an agriculture firm. They had like the massive greenhouses and they were growing these awesome tomatoes. Well that was Edge too. It was actually further Edge. So I guess those are both Edge, right? >> Sarvesh: Yeah, yeah, yeah. >> Spectrum there, right? And then the telecom business, now you're saying is more closely aligned with that? >> Right. >> Depending on what you're trying to do. The appropriate place for the Edge is different. You, you nailed it exactly, right. So if you need wide area, low latency, the Edge being in the telecom network actually makes a lot of sense 'cause they can serve wide area low latency. If you're just doing your manufacturing plant or your logistics facility or your agricultural growing site, that's the Edge. So that's exactly right. And the tech, the reason why they're close cousins between telecom and that is, you're going to need some kind of connectivity, some kind of connectivity from that Edge, in order to execute whatever it's you're trying to do with your business. >> Nature's Fresh was the company. I couldn't think of Nature's Fresh. They're great. Keith awesome Cube guest. >> You mentioned this mix of Wi-Fi and 5G. I know it's impossible to predict with dates certain, you know, when this, how's this is going to develop. But can you imagine a scenario where at some point in time we don't think in terms of Wi-Fi because everything is essentially enabled by a SIM or am I missing a critical piece there, in terms of management of spectrum and the complicated governmental? >> Yeah, there is- >> Situation, am I missing something? It seems like a logical progression to me, but what am I missing? >> Well, there is something to be said about spectrum, right? If you look at Wi-Fi, as I said, the driver behind the technology is different. However, I fully agree with you that at some point in time, whether it's Wi-Fi behind, whether it's private 5G behind becomes a moot point. It's simply a matter of, where is my data being generated? What is the best technology for me to use to ingest that data so I can derive value out of that data. If it means Wi-Fi, so be it. If it means cellular, so be it. And if you look at cellular right? The biggest thing people talk about SIMs. Now if you look at 5G standard. In 5G standard, you have EAPTLS, which means there is a possibility that SIMs in the future go away for IoT devices. I'm not saying they need to go away for consumer devices, they probably need to be there. But who's to say going ahead for IoT devices, they all become SIM free. So at that point, whether you Wi-Fi or 5G doesn't matter. >> Yeah, by the way, on the spectrum side people are starting to think about the concept. You might have heard this NRU, new radio unlicensed. So it's running the Wi-Fi standard, but in the unlicensed bands like Wi-Fi. So, and then the last piece is of course you know, the cost, the reality it stays 5G still new technology, the endpoints, you know, what would go in your laptop or a sensor et cetera. Today that's more expensive than Wi-Fi. So we need to get the volume curve down a little bit for that to really hit every application. I would guess your vision is correct. >> David: Yep >> But who can predict? >> Yeah, so explain more about what the unlicensed piece means for organizations. What does that for everybody? >> That's more of a future thing. So you know, just- >> No, right, but let's put on our telescope. >> Okay, so it's true today that Wi-Fi traditionally runs in the bands that have been licensed by the government and it's a country by country thing, right? >> Dave: Right. >> What we did in the United States was CBRS, is different than what they've done in Germany where they took part of the Zurich C-band and gave it to the enterprises. The telco's not involved. And now that's been copied in Japan and Korea. So it's one of the complications unfortunately in the market. Is that you have this different approach by regulators in different countries. Wi-Fi, the unlicensed band is a nice global standard. So if you could run NR just as 5G, right? It's another name for 5G, run that in the unlicensed bands, then you solve the spectrum problem that Dave was asking about. >> Which means that the market really opens up and now. >> It would be a real enabler >> Innovation. >> Exactly. >> And the only thing I would add to that is, right, there are some enterprises who have the size and scale to kind of say, "Hey, I'm going the unlicensed route. I can do things on my own." There are some enterprises that still are going to rely on the telcos, right? So I don't want to make a demon out of the telcos that you own the spectrum, no. >> David: Sure. >> They will be offering a very valuable service to a massive number of small, medium enterprises and enterprises that span regional boundaries to say, hey we can bring that consistent experience to you. >> But the primary value proposition has been connectivity, right? >> Yes. >> I mean, we can all agree on that. And you hear different monetization models, we can't allow the OTT vendors to do it again. You know, we want to tax Netflix. Okay, we've been talking about that all week. But there may be better models. >> Sarvesh: Yes. >> Right, and so where does private network fit into the monetization models? Let's follow the money here. >> Actually you've brought up an extremely important point, right? Because if you look at why haven't 5G networks taken off, one of the biggest things people keep contrasting is what is the cost of a Wi-Fi versus the cost of deploying a 5G, right? And a portion of the cost of deploying a 5G is how do you commercialize that spectrum? What is going to be the cost of that spectrum, right? So the CSPs will have to eventually figure out a proper commercialization model to say, hey listen, I can't just take what I've been doing till date and say this is how I make. Because if you look at 5G, the return of investment is incremental. Any use case you take, unless, let's take smart manufacturing, unless the factory decides I'm going to rip and replace everything by a 5G, they're going to introduce a small use case. You look at the investment for that use case, you'll say Hmm, I'm not making money. But guess what? Once you've deployed it and you bring use case number two, three, four, five, now it starts to really add value. So how can a CSP acknowledge that and create commercial models to enable that is going to be key. Like one of the things that Dell does in terms of as a service solution that we offer. I think that is a crucial way of really kick starting 5G adoption. >> It's Metcalfe's Law in this world, right? The first telephone, not a lot of value, second, I can call one person, but you know if I can call a zillion now it's valuable. >> John: Now you got data. >> Yeah, right, you used a phrase, rip and replace. What percentage of the market that you are focusing on is the let's go in and replace something, versus the let's help you digitally transform your business. And this is a networking technology that we can use to help you digitally transform? The example that you guys have with the small breweries, a perfect example. >> Sarvesh: Yeah. >> You help digitize, you know, digitally transform their business. You weren't going in and saying, I see that you have these things connected via Wi-Fi, let's rip those out and put SIMs in. >> No. >> Nope, so you know- >> That's exactly right. It's enabling new things that either couldn't be achieved before or weren't. So from a private 5G perspective, it's not going to be rip and replaced. As I said, I think we'll coexist with Wi-Fi, it's still got a great role. It's enabling those, solving those business problems that either hadn't been solved before or could not be solved with other technology. >> How are you guys using AI? Everybody's talking about ChatGPT. I love ChatGPT, we use it all the time. Love it, hate it, you know, whatever. It's a fun topic. But AI generally is here in a way that it wasn't when the enterprise disaggregated. >> John: Right. >> So there's AI, there's automation, there's opportunities there. How do they fit into private 5G? >> So if you look at it, right, AI, AI/ML is actually crucial to value extraction from that data, because all private 5G is doing is giving you access to that precious data. But that data by itself means nothing, right? You get access to the data, extracting value out of the data that bring in business value is all going to be AI/ML. Whether it's computer vision, whether it's data analytics on the fly so that you can, you know do your closed loop controls or what have you. All of these are going to be AI/ML models. >> Dave: Does it play into automation as well? >> Absolutely, 'cause they drive the automation, right? You learn your AI models, drive their automation. Control, closed loop control systems are a perfect example of their automation. >> Explain that further. Like give us an example. >> So for example, let's say we're talking about a smart manufacturing, right? So you have widgets coming down the pipe, right? You have your computer vision, you have your AI/ML model that says, "Hey, I'm starting to detect a consistent error in the product being manufactured. I'm going to close loop that automation and either tweak the settings of the machine, shut down the machine, open a workflow, escalate it for human intervention." All that automation is facilitated by the AI/ML models >> And that, and by the way, there's real money in that, right? If you're making your power and you're making it wrong, you don't detect it for hours, there's real money in fixing that >> Right. >> So I've got a, I've got an example albeit a slight, not even slightly, but a tragic one. Let's say you have a train that's rolling down the tracks at every several miles or so, temperature readings are taken from bearings in the train. >> Sarvesh: Yes, yes. >> Wouldn't it be nice to have that be happening in real time? >> Sarvesh: Yes. >> So it doesn't reach that critical point >> Yes. >> Where then you have a derailment. >> Yes. >> Yeah, absolutely. >> I mean, those are, it's doesn't sound sexy in terms of "Hey, what a great business use case that we can monetize." >> John: Yeah. >> But I'll bet you in hindsight that operator would've loved to have that capability. >> John: Yeah. >> Sarvesh: Right. >> To be able to shut the train down and not run. >> That's a great example where the carrier is actually, probably in a good position, right? Cause you got wide area, you want low latency. So the traditional carriers would be able in great position to provide that exact service. Telemetry is another great example. We've been talking about other kinds of automation, but just picking up measurements and so on. The other example of that is in oil and gas, right? As you've got pipelines running around you're measuring pressure, temperature, you detect a leak, >> David: Right. >> in minutes, not weeks. >> David: Right. >> So there's a lot of good examples of things like that >> To pick up in a point, Dave. You know, it's like you look at these big huge super tankers, right? They have big private networks on that super tanker to monitor everything. If on this train we had, you know, we hear about so many Edges, let's call one more the rolling Edge. >> Yeah. >> Right, that, that Edge is right on that locomotive tracking everything with AI/ML models, detecting things, warning people ahead of time shutting it down as needed. And that connectivity doesn't have to be wired. It can be a rolling wireless. It potentially could be a spectrum that's you know, open spectrum in the future. Or as you said, an operator could facilitate that. So many options, right? >> Yeah, got to double down on this. Look, I know 'cause I've been involved in some of these projects. Amusement park operators are doing this for rides. >> John: Yes. >> Sarvesh: Yep. >> So that they can optimize the amount of time the ride is up, so they can shorten lines >> Yes. >> So that they can get people into shops to buy food and souvenirs. >> John: Yes. >> Certainly we should be able to do it to protect infrastructure. >> Sarvesh: Absolutely. >> Right, so- >> But I think the ultimate point you're making is, it's actually quite finally segmented. There's so many different applications. And so that's why again, we come back to what we started with is at Dell, we're bringing the solution from Edge, compute, application, connectivity, and be able to bring that across all these different verticals and these different solutions. The other amusement park example, by the way, is as the rides start to invest in virtual reality, so you're moving, but you're seeing something, you need some technology like 5G to have low latency and keep that in sync and have a good experience on the ride. >> To 5G and beyond, gents. Thanks so much for coming on theCUBE. >> All right, thank you Dave. >> It was great to have you. >> Thank, thank you guys. >> Great to meet you guys. Thank you very much. >> Great, all right. Keep it right there. For David Nicholson and Dave Vellante, This is theCUBE's coverage of MWC23. Check out siliconangle.com for all the news. theCUBE.net is where all these videos live. John Furrier is in our Palo Alto office, banging out that news. Keep it right there. Be right back after this short break. (gentle upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. in the copter, in the right. It's the buzz of the show. Players that are important in the space. Okay, I got to ask you about AlphaNet. We got to be able to match the solution are sort of out of the box, the application stack to play intersection of the two. How that plays out in the long term? So that really is kind of the difference. So you actually need the scale that comes, You know, you need something I mean if you look at Wi-Fi, is the idea of open standards. the opportunity to use open And the only thing to add to that is and private 4G, is right off the bat and you have solutions, and the application to storage in the Dell organization. Yeah, so if you look at Dell, right? and the discussion was about the Edge. They had like the massive greenhouses So if you need wide area, low latency, I couldn't think of Nature's Fresh. and the complicated governmental? What is the best technology for me to use the endpoints, you know, What does that for everybody? So you know, just- No, right, but let's run that in the unlicensed bands, Which means that the market that you own the spectrum, no. and enterprises that span And you hear different into the monetization models? that is going to be key. person, but you know to help you digitally transform? I see that you have these it's not going to be rip and replaced. Love it, hate it, you know, whatever. So there's AI, there's automation, so that you can, you know drive the automation, right? Explain that further. So you have widgets coming from bearings in the train. you have a derailment. I mean, those are, it's But I'll bet you in hindsight To be able to shut the So the traditional carriers would be able If on this train we had, you know, spectrum that's you know, Yeah, got to double down on this. So that they can to protect infrastructure. as the rides start to To 5G and beyond, gents. Great to meet you guys. for all the news.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AlphaNet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sarvesh Sharma | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John McCready | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Germany | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Korea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Airspan | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nature's Fresh | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Keith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
one person | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
expedo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sarvesh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first telephone | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
theCUBE.net | OTHER | 0.97+ |
Today | DATE | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
Metcalfe | PERSON | 0.94+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Dell Tech World | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
MWC23 | EVENT | 0.92+ |
first several years | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Luis Ceze, OctoML | Cube Conversation
(gentle music) >> Hello, everyone. Welcome to this Cube Conversation. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE here, in our Palo Alto Studios. We're featuring OctoML. I'm with the CEO, Luis Ceze. Chief Executive Officer, Co-founder of OctoML. I'm John Furrier of theCUBE. Thanks for joining us today. Luis, great to see you. Last time we spoke was at "re:MARS" Amazon's event. Kind of a joint event between (indistinct) and Amazon, kind of put a lot together. Great to see you. >> Great to see you again, John. I really have good memories of that interview. You know, that was definitely a great time. Great to chat with you again. >> The world of ML and AI, machine learning and AI is really hot. Everyone's talking about it. It's really great to see that advance. So I'm looking forward to this conversation but before we get started, introduce who you are in OctoML. >> Sure. I'm Luis Ceze, Co-founder and CEO at OctoML. I'm also professor of Computer Science at University of Washington. You know, OctoML grew out of our efforts on the Apache CVM project, which is a compiler in runtime system that enables folks to run machine learning models in a broad set of harder in the Edge and in the Cloud very efficiently. You know, we grew that project and grew that community, definitely saw there was something to pain point there. And then we built OctoML, OctoML is about three and a half years old now. And the mission, the company is to enable customers to deploy models very efficiently in the Cloud. And make them, you know, run. Do it quickly, run fast, and run at a low cost, which is something that's especially timely right now. >> I like to point out also for the folks 'casue they should know that you're also a professor in the Computer Science department at University of Washington. A great program there. This is a really an inflection point with AI machine learning. The computer science industry has been waiting for decades to advance AI with all this new cloud computing, all the hardware and silicon advancements, GPUs. This is the perfect storm. And you know, this the computer science now we we're seeing an acceleration. Can you share your view, and you're obviously a professor in that department but also, an entrepreneur. This is a great time for computer science. Explain why. >> Absolutely, yeah, no. Just like the confluence of you know, advances in what, you know, computers can do as devices to computer information. Plus, you know, advances in AI that enable applications that you know, we thought it was highly futuristic and now it's just right there today. You know, AI that can generate photo realistic images from descriptions, you know, can write text that's pretty good. Can help augment, you know, human creativity in a really meaningful way. So you see the confluence of capabilities and the creativity of humankind into new applications is just extremely exciting, both from a researcher point of view as well as an entrepreneur point of view, right. >> What should people know about these large language models we're seeing with ChatGPT and how Google has got a lot of work going on that air. There's been a lot of work recently. What's different now about these models, and why are they so popular and effective now? What's the difference between now, and say five years ago, that makes it more- >> Oh, yeah. It's a huge inflection on their capabilities, I always say like emergent behavior, right? So as these models got more complex and our ability to train and deploy them, you know, got to this point... You know, they really crossed a threshold into doing things that are truly surprising, right? In terms of generating, you know, exhalation for things generating tax, summarizing tax, expending tax. And you know, exhibiting what to some may look like reasoning. They're not quite reasoning fundamentally. They're generating tax that looks like they're reasoning, but they do it so well, that it feels like was done by a human, right. So I would say that the biggest changes that, you know, now, they can actually do things that are extremely useful for business in people's lives today. And that wasn't the case five years ago. So that's in the model capabilities and that is being paired with huge advances in computing that enabled this to be... Enables this to be, you know, actually see line of sites to be deployed at scale, right. And that's where we come in, by the way, but yeah. >> Yeah, I want to get into that. And also, you know, the fusion of data integrating data sets at scales. Another one we're seeing a lot of happening now. It's not just some, you know, siloed, pre-built data modeling. It's a lot of agility and a lot of new integration capabilities of data. How is that impacting the dynamics? >> Yeah, absolutely. So I'll say that the ability to either take the data that has that exists in training a model to do something useful with it, and more interestingly I would say, using baseline foundational models and with a little bit of data, turn them into something that can do a specialized task really, really well. Created this really fast proliferation of really impactful applications, right? >> If every company now is looking at this trend and I'm seeing a lot... And I think every company will rebuild their business with machine learning. If they're not already doing it. And the folks that aren't will probably be dinosaurs will be out of business. This is a real business transformation moment where machine learning and AI, as it goes mainstream. I think it's just the beginning. This is where you guys come in, and you guys are poised for handling this frenzy to change business with machine learning models. How do you guys help customers as they look at this, you know, transition to get, you know, concept to production with machine learning? >> Great. Great questions, yeah, so I would say that it's fair to say there's a bunch of models out there that can do useful things right off the box, right? So and also, the ability to create models improved quite a bit. So the challenge now shifted to customers, you know. Everyone is looking to incorporating AI into their applications. So what we do for them is to, first of all, how do you do that quickly, without needing highly specialized, difficult to find engineering? And very importantly, how do you do that at cost that's accessible, right? So all of these fantastic models that we just talked about, they use an amount of computing that's just astronomical compared to anything else we've done in the past. It means the costs that come with it, are also very, very high. So it's important to enable customers to, you know, incorporate AI into their applications, to their use cases in a way that they can do, with the people that they have, and the costs that they can afford, such that they can have, you know, the maximum impacting possibly have. And finally, you know, helping them deal with hardware availability, as you know, even though we made a lot of progress in making computing cheaper and cheaper. Even to this day, you know, you can never get enough. And getting an allocation, getting the right hardware to run these incredibly hungry models is hard. And we help customers deal with, you know, harder availability as well. >> Yeah, for the folks watching as a... If you search YouTube, there's an interview we did last year at "re:MARS," I mentioned that earlier, just a great interview. You talked about this hardware independence, this traction. I want to get into that, because if you look at all the foundation models that are out there right now, that are getting traction, you're seeing two trends. You're seeing proprietary and open source. And obviously, open source always wins in my opinion, but, you know, there's this iPhone moment and android moment that one of your investors John Torrey from Madrona, talked about was is iPhone versus Android moment, you know, one's proprietary hardware and they're very specialized high performance and then open source. This is an important distinction and you guys are hardware independent. What's the... Explain what all this means. >> Yeah. Great set of questions. First of all, yeah. So, you know, OpenAI, and of course, they create ChatGPT and they offer an API to run these models that does amazing things. But customers have to be able to go and send their data over to OpenAI, right? So, and run the model there and get the outputs. Now, there's open source models that can do amazing things as well, right? So they typically open source models, so they don't lag behind, you know, these proprietary closed models by more than say, you know, six months or so, let's say. And it means that enabling customers to take the models that they want and deploy under their control is something that's very valuable, because one, you don't have to expose your data to externally. Two, you can customize the model even more to the things that you wanted to do. And then three, you can run on an infrastructure that can be much more cost effective than having to, you know, pay somebody else's, you know, cost and markup, right? So, and where we help them is essentially help customers, enable customers to take machine learning models, say an open source model, and automate the process of putting them into production, optimize them to run with the right performance, and more importantly, give them the independence to run where they need to run, where they can run best, right? >> Yeah, and also, you know, I point out all the time that, you know, there's never any stopping the innovation of hardware silicon. You're seeing cloud computing more coming in there. So, you know, being hardware independent has some advantages. And if you look at OpenAI, for instance, you mentioned ChatGPT, I think this is interesting because I think everyone is scratching their head, going, "Okay, I need to move to this new generation." What's your pro tip and advice for folks who want to move to, or businesses that want to say move to machine learning? How do they get started? What are some of the considerations they need to think about to deploy these models into production? >> Yeah, great though. Great set of questions. First of all, I mean, I'm sure they're very aware of the kind of things that you want to do with AI, right? So you could be interacting with customers, you know, automating, interacting with customers. It could be, you know, finding issues in production lines. It could be, you know... Generating, you know, making it easier to produce content and so on. Like, you know, customers, users would have an idea what they want to do. You know, from that it can actually determine, what kind of machine learning models would solve the problem that would, you know, fits that use case. But then, that's when the hard thing begins, right? So when you find a model, identify the model that can do the thing that you wanted to do, you need to turn that into a thing that you can deploy. So how do you go from machine learning model that does a thing that you need to do, to a container with the right executor, the artifact they can actually go and deploy, right? So we've seen customers doing that on their own, right? So, and it's got a bit of work, and that's why we are excited about the automation that we can offer and then turn that into a turnkey problem, right? So a turnkey process. >> Luis, talk about the use cases. If I don't mind going and double down on the previous answer. You got existing services, and then there's new AI applications, AI for applications. What are the use cases with existing stuff, and the new applications that are being built? >> Yeah, I mean, existing itself is, for example, how do you do very smart search and auto completion, you know, when you are editing documents, for example. Very, very smart search of documents, summarization of tax, expanding bullets into pros in a way that, you know, don't have to spend as much human time. Just some of the existing applications, right? So some of the new ones are like truly AI native ways of producing content. Like there's a company that, you know, we share investors and love what they're doing called runwayyML, for example. It's sort of like an AI first way of editing and creating visual content, right? So you could say you have a video, you could say make this video look like, it's night as opposed to dark, or remove that dog in the corner. You can do that in a way that you couldn't do otherwise. So there's like definitely AI native use cases. And yet not only in life sciences, you know, there's quite a bit of advances on AI-based, you know, therapies and diagnostics processes that are designed using automated processes. And this is something that I feel like, we were just scratching the surface there. There's huge opportunities there, right? >> Talk about the inference and AI and production kind of angle here, because cost is a huge concern when you look at... And there's a hardware and that flexibility there. So I can see how that could help, but is there a cost freight train that can get out of control here if you don't deploy properly? Talk about the scale problem around cost in AI. >> Yeah, absolutely. So, you know, very quickly. One thing that people tend to think about is the cost is. You know, training has really high dollar amounts it tends over index on that. But what you have to think about is that for every model that's actually useful, you're going to train it once, and then run it a large number of times in inference. That means that over the lifetime of a model, the vast majority of the compute cycles and the cost are going to go to inference. And that's what we address, right? So, and to give you some idea, if you're talking about using large language model today, you know, you can say it's going to cost a couple of cents per, you know, 2,000 words output. If you have a million users active, you know, a day, you know, if you're lucky and you have that, you can, this cost can actually balloon very quickly to millions of dollars a month, just in inferencing costs. You know, assuming you know, that you actually have access to the infrastructure to run it, right? So means that if you don't pay attention to these inference costs and that's definitely going to be a surprise. And affects the economics of the product where this is embedded in, right? So this is something that, you know, if there's quite a bit of attention being put on right now on how do you do search with large language models and you don't pay attention to the economics, you know, you can have a surprise. You have to change the business model there. >> Yeah. I think that's important to call out, because you don't want it to be a runaway cost structure where you architected it wrong and then next thing you know, you got to unwind that. I mean, it's more than technical debt, it's actually real debt, it's real money. So, talk about some of the dynamics with the customers. How are they architecting this? How do they get ahead of that problem? What do you guys do specifically to solve that? >> Yeah, I mean, well, we help customers. So, it's first of all, be hyper aware, you know, understanding what's going to be the cost for them deploying the models into production and showing them the possibilities of how you can deploy the model with different cost structure, right? So that's where, you know, the ability to have hardware independence is so important because once you have hardware independence, after you optimize models, obviously, you have a new, you know, dimension of freedom to choose, you know, what is the right throughput per dollar for you. And then where, and what are the options? And once you make that decision, you want to automate the process of putting into production. So the way we help customers is showing very clearly in their use case, you know, how they can deploy their models in a much more cost-effective way. You know, when the cases... There's a case study that we put out recently, showing a 4x reduction in deployment costs, right? So this is by doing a mix optimization and choosing the right hardware. >> How do you address the concern that someone might say, Luis said, "Hey, you know, I don't want to degrade performance and latency, and I don't want the user experience to suffer." What's the answer there? >> Two things. So first of all, all of the manipulations that we do in the model is to turn the model to efficient code without changing the behavior of the models. We wouldn't degrade the experience of the user by having the model be wrong more often. And we don't change that at all. The model behaves the way it was validated for. And then the second thing is, you know, user experience with respect to latency, it's all about a maximum... Like, you could say, I want a model to run at 50 milliseconds or less. If it's much faster than 15 seconds, you're not going to notice the difference. But if it's lower, you're going to notice a difference. So the key here is that, how do you find a set of options to deploy, that you are not overshooting performance in a way that's going to lead to costs that has no additional benefits. And this provides a huge, a very significant margin of choices, set of choices that you can optimize for cost without degrading customer experience, right. End user experience. >> Yeah, and I also point out the large language models like the ChatGPTs of the world, they're coming out with Dave Moth and I were talking on this breaking analysis around, this being like, over 10X more computational intensive on capabilities. So this hardware independence is a huge thing. So, and also supply chain, some people can't get servers by the way, so, or hardware these days. >> Or even more interestingly, right? So they do not grow in trees, John. Like GPUs is not kind of stuff that you plant an orchard until you have a bunch and then you can increase it, but no, these things, you know, take a while. So, and you can't increase it overnight. So being able to live with those cycles that are available to you is not just important for all for cost, but also important for people to scale and serve more users at, you know, at whatever pace that they come, right? >> You know, it's really great to talk to you, and congratulations on OctaML. Looking forward to the startup showcase, we'll be featuring you guys there. But I want to get your personal opinion as someone in the industry and also, someone who's been in the computer science area for your career. You know, computer science has always been great, and there's more people enrolling in computer science, more diversity than ever before, but there's also more computer science related fields. How is this opening up computer science and where's AI going with the computers, with the science? Can you share your vision on, you know, the aperture, or the landscape of CompSci, or CS students, and opportunities. >> Yeah, no, absolutely. I think it's fair to say that computer has been embedded in pretty much every aspect of human life these days. Human life these days, right? So for everything. And AI has been a counterpart, it been an integral component of computer science for a while. And this medicines that happened in the last 10, 15 years in AI has shown, you know, new application has I think re-energized how people see what computers can do. And you, you know, there is this picture in our department that shows computer science at the center called the flower picture, and then all the different paddles like life sciences, social sciences, and then, you know, mechanical engineering, all these other things that, and I feel like it can replace that center with computer science. I put AI there as well, you see AI, you know touching all these applications. AI in healthcare, diagnostics. AI in discovery in the sciences, right? So, but then also AI doing things that, you know, the humans wouldn't have to do anymore. They can do better things with their brains, right? So it's permitting every single aspect of human life from intellectual endeavor to day-to-day work, right? >> Yeah. And I think the ChatGPT and OpenAI has really kind of created a mainstream view that everyone sees value in it. Like you could be in the data center, you could be in bio, you could be in healthcare. I mean, every industry sees value. So this brings up what I can call the horizontally scalable use constance. And so this opens up the conversation, what's going to change from this? Because if you go horizontally scalable, which is a cloud concept as you know, that's going to create a lot of opportunities and some shifting of how you think about architecture around data, for instance. What's your opinion on what this will do to change the inflection of the role of architecting platforms and the role of data specifically? >> Yeah, so good question. There is a lot in there, by the way, I should have added the previous question, that you can use AI to do better AI as well, which is what we do, and other folks are doing as well. And so the point I wanted to make here is that it's pretty clear that you have a cloud focus component with a nudge focused counterparts. Like you have AI models, but both in the Cloud and in the Edge, right? So the ability of being able to run your AI model where it runs best also has a data advantage to it from say, from a privacy point of view. That's inherently could say, "Hey, I want to run something, you know, locally, strictly locally, such that I don't expose the data to an infrastructure." And you know that the data never leaves you, right? Never leaves the device. Now you can imagine things that's already starting to happen, like you do some forms of training and model customization in the model architecture itself and the system architecture, such that you do this as close to the user as possible. And there's something called federated learning that has been around for some time now that's finally happening is, how do you get a data from butcher places, you do, you know, some common learning and then you send a model to the Edges, and they get refined for the final use in a way that you get the advantage of aggregating data but you don't get the disadvantage of privacy issues and so on. >> It's super exciting. >> And some of the considerations, yeah. >> It's super exciting area around data infrastructure, data science, computer science. Luis, congratulations on your success at OctaML. You're in the middle of it. And the best thing about its businesses are looking at this and really reinventing themselves and if a business isn't thinking about restructuring their business around AI, they're probably will be out of business. So this is a great time to be in the field. So thank you for sharing your insights here in theCUBE. >> Great. Thank you very much, John. Always a pleasure talking to you. Always have a lot of fun. And we both speak really fast, I can tell, you know, so. (both laughing) >> I know. We'll not the transcript available, we'll integrate it into our CubeGPT model that we have Luis. >> That's right. >> Great. >> Great. >> Great to talk to you, thank you, John. Thanks, man, bye. >> Hey, this is theCUBE. I'm John Furrier, here in Palo Alto, Cube Conversation. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
Luis, great to see you. Great to chat with you again. introduce who you are in OctoML. And make them, you know, run. And you know, this the Just like the confluence of you know, What's the difference between now, Enables this to be, you know, And also, you know, the fusion of data So I'll say that the ability and you guys are poised for handling Even to this day, you know, and you guys are hardware independent. so they don't lag behind, you know, I point out all the time that, you know, that would, you know, fits that use case. and the new applications in a way that, you know, if you don't deploy properly? So, and to give you some idea, and then next thing you So that's where, you know, Luis said, "Hey, you know, that you can optimize for cost like the ChatGPTs of the world, that are available to you Can you share your vision on, you know, you know, the humans which is a cloud concept as you know, is that it's pretty clear that you have So thank you for sharing your I can tell, you know, so. We'll not the transcript available, Great to talk to you, I'm John Furrier, here in
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Luis Ceze | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Moth | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Torrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Luis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2,000 words | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
OctoML | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
4x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
android | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Madrona | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 milliseconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
OctaML | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
University of Washington | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
OctoML | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Android | TITLE | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
15 seconds | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
ChatGPT | TITLE | 0.94+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
over 10X | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
OpenAI | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
OctoML | TITLE | 0.91+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
about three and a half years | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
OpenAI | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Apache | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
two trends | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Palo Alto Studios | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
millions of dollars a month | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
One thing | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
a million users | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
Palo Alto, | LOCATION | 0.82+ |
CubeGPT | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.81+ |
re:MARS | EVENT | 0.76+ |
ChatGPT | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
single aspect | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
couple of cents | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
runwayyML | TITLE | 0.64+ |
10, 15 years | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
Cube | TITLE | 0.57+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.52+ |
last | DATE | 0.5+ |
Conversation | EVENT | 0.49+ |
Conversation | LOCATION | 0.41+ |
Edges | TITLE | 0.38+ |
Conversation | ORGANIZATION | 0.36+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.36+ |
Driving Business Results with Cloud Transformation | Aditi Banerjee and Todd Edmunds
>> Welcome back to the program. My name is Dave Valante and in this session, we're going to explore one of the more interesting topics of the day. IoT for Smart Factories. And with me are, Todd Edmunds,the Global CTO of Smart Manufacturing Edge and Digital Twins at Dell Technologies. That is such a cool title. (chuckles) I want to be you. And Dr. Aditi Banerjee, who's the Vice President, General Manager for Aerospace Defense and Manufacturing at DXC Technology. Another really cool title. Folks, welcome to the program. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks Dave. >> Thank you. Great to be here. >> Nice to be here. >> Todd, let's start with you. We hear a lot about Industry 4.0, Smart Factories, IIoT. Can you briefly explain, what is Industry 4.0 all about and why is it important for the manufacturing industry? >> Yeah. Sure, Dave. You know, it's been around for quite a while and it's gone by multiple different names, as you said. Industry 4.0, Smart Manufacturing, Industrial IoT, Smart Factory. But it all really means the same thing, its really applying technology to get more out of the factories and the facilities that you have to do your manufacturing. So, being much more efficient, implementing really good sustainability initiatives. And so, we really look at that by saying, okay, what are we going to do with technology to really accelerate what we've been doing for a long, long time? So it's really not- it's not new. It's been around for a long time. What's new is that manufacturers are looking at this, not as a one-of, two-of individual Use Case point of view but instead they're saying, we really need to look at this holistically, thinking about a strategic investment in how we do this. Not to just enable one or two Use Cases, but enable many many Use Cases across the spectrum. I mean, there's tons of them out there. There's Predictive maintenance and there's OEE, Overall Equipment Effectiveness and there's Computer Vision and all of these things are starting to percolate down to the factory floor, but it needs to be done in a little bit different way and really to really get those outcomes that they're looking for in Smart Factory or Industry 4.0 or however you want to call it. And truly transform, not just throw an Industry 4.0 Use Case out there but to do the digital transformation that's really necessary and to be able to stay relevant for the future. I heard it once said that you have three options. Either you digitally transform and stay relevant for the future or you don't and fade into history. Like, 52% of the companies that used to be on the Fortune 500 since 2000. Right? And so, really that's a key thing and we're seeing that really, really being adopted by manufacturers all across the globe. >> Yeah. So, Aditi, it's like digital transformation is almost synonymous with business transformation. So, is there anything you'd add to what Todd just said? >> Absolutely. Though, I would really add that what really drives Industry 4.0 is the business transformation. What we are able to deliver in terms of improving the manufacturing KPIs and the KPIs for customer satisfaction, right? For example, improving the downtime or decreasing the maintenance cycle of the equipments or improving the quality of products, right? So, I think these are lot of business outcomes that our customers are looking at while using Industry 4.0 and the technologies of Industry 4.0 to deliver these outcomes. >> So, Aditi, I wonder if I could stay with you and maybe this is a bit esoteric but when I first first started researching IoT and Industrial IoT 4.0, et cetera, I felt, well, there could be some disruptions in the ecosystem. I kind of came to the conclusion that large manufacturing firms, Aerospace Defense companies the firms building out critical infrastructure actually had kind of an incumbent advantage and a great opportunity. Of course, then I saw on TV somebody now they're building homes with 3D printers. It like blows your mind. So that's pretty disruptive. But, so- But they got to continue, the incumbents have to continue to invest in the future. They're well-capitalized. They're pretty good businesses, very good businesses but there's a lot of complexities involved in kind of connecting the old house to the new addition that's being built, if you will, or this transformation that we're talking about. So, my question is, how are your customers preparing for this new era? What are the key challenges that they're facing in the the blockers, if you will? >> Yeah, I mean the customers are looking at Industry 4.0 for Greenfield Factories, right? That is where the investments are going directly into building the factories with the new technologies, with the new connectivities, right? For the machines, for example, Industrial IoT having the right type of data platforms to drive computational analytics and outcomes, as well as looking at Edge versus Cloud type of technologies, right? Those are all getting built in the Greenfield Factories. However, for the Install-Based Factories, right? That is where our customers are looking at how do I modernize these factories? How do I connect the existing machine? And that is where some of the challenges come in on the legacy system connectivity that they need to think about. Also, they need to start thinking about cybersecurity and operation technology security because now you are connecting the factories to each other. So, cybersecurity becomes top of mind, right? So, there is definitely investment that is involved. Clients are creating roadmaps for digitizing and modernizing these factories and investments in a very strategic way. So, perhaps they start with the innovation program and then they look at the business case and they scale it up, right? >> Todd, I'm glad you did brought up security, because if you think about the operations technology folks, historically they air-gaped the systems, that's how they created security. That's changed. The business came in and said, 'Hey, we got to connect. We got to make it intelligence.' So, that's got to be a big challenge as well. >> It absolutely is, Dave. And, you know, you can no longer just segment that because really to get all of those efficiencies that we talk about, that IoT and Industrial IoT and Industry 4.0 promise, you have to get data out of the factory but then you got to put data back in the factory. So, no longer is it just firewalling everything is really the answer. So, you really have to have a comprehensive approach to security, but you also have to have a comprehensive approach to the Cloud and what that means. And does it mean a continuum of Cloud all the way down to the Edge, right down to the factory? It absolutely does. Because no one approach has the answer to everything. The more you go to the Cloud the broader the attack surface is. So, what we're seeing is a lot of our customers approaching this from kind of that hybrid right ones run anywhere on the factory floor down to the Edge. And one of the things we're seeing too, is to help distinguish between what is the Edge and bridge that gap between, like, Dave, you talked about IT and OT and also help what Aditi talked about is the Greenfield Plants versus the Brownfield Plants that they call it, that are the legacy ones and modernizing those. It's great to kind of start to delineate what does that mean? Where's the Edge? Where's the IT and the OT? We see that from a couple of different ways. We start to think about really two Edges in a manufacturing floor. We talk about an Industrial Edge that sits... or some people call it a Far Edge or a Thin Edge, sits way down on that plant, consists of industrial hardened devices that do that connectivity. The hard stuff about how do I connect to this obsolete legacy protocol and what do I do with it? And create that next generation of data that has context. And then we see another Edge evolving above that, which is much more of a data and analytics and enterprise grade application layer that sits down in the factory itself; that helps figure out where we're going to run this? Does it connect to the Cloud? Do we run Applications On-Prem? Because a lot of times that On-Prem Application it needs to be done. 'Cause that's the only way that it's going to work because of security requirements, because of latency requirements performance and a lot of times, cost. It's really helpful to build that Multiple-Edge strategy because then you kind of, you consolidate all of those resources, applications, infrastructure, hardware into a centralized location. Makes it much, much easier to really deploy and manage that security. But it also makes it easier to deploy new Applications, new Use Cases and become the foundation for DXC'S expertise and Applications that they deliver to our customers as well. >> Todd, how complex are these projects? I mean, I feel like it's kind of the the digital equivalent of building the Hoover Dam. I mean, its.. so yeah. How long does a typical project take? I know it varies, but what are the critical success factors in terms of delivering business value quickly? >> Yeah, that's a great question in that we're- you know, like I said at the beginning, this is not new. Smart Factory and Industry 4.0 is not new. It's been, it's people have been trying to implement the Holy Grail of Smart Factory for a long time. And what we're seeing is a switch, a little bit of a switch or quite a bit of a switch to where the enterprises and the IT folks are having a much bigger say and they have a lot to offer to be able to help that complexity. So, instead of deploying a computer here and a Gateway there and a Server there, I mean, you go walk into any manufacturing plant and you can see Servers sitting underneath someone's desk or a PC in a closet somewhere running a critical production application. So, we're seeing the enterprise have a much bigger say at the table, much louder voice at the table to say, we've been doing this enterprise all the time. We know how to really consolidate, bring Hyper-Converged Applications, Hyper-Converged Infrastructure to really accelerate these kind of applications. Really accelerate the outcomes that are needed to really drive that Smart Factory and start to bring that same capabilities down into the Mac on the factory floor. That way, if you do it once to make it easier to implement, you can repeat that. You can scale that. You can manage it much easily and you can then bring that all together because you have the security in one centralized location. So, we're seeing manufacturers that first Use Case may be fairly difficult to implement and we got to go down in and see exactly what their problems are. But when the infrastructure is done the correct way when that- Think about how you're going to run that and how are you going to optimize the engineering. Well, let's take that what you've done in that one factory and then set. Let's make that across all the factories including the factory that we're in, then across the globe. That makes it much, much easier. You really do the hard work once and then repeat. Almost like cookie cutter. >> Got it. Thank you. >> Aditi, what about the skillsets available to apply these to these projects? You got to have knowledge of digital, AI, Data, Integration. Is there a talent shortage to get all this stuff done? >> Yeah, I mean, definitely. Lot different types of skillsets are needed from a traditional manufacturing skillset, right? Of course, the basic knowledge of manufacturing is important. But the digital skillsets like IoT, having a skillset in in different Protocols for connecting the machines, right? That experience that comes with it. Data and Analytics, Security, Augmented Virtual Reality Programming. Again, looking at Robotics and the Digital Twin. So, the... It's a lot more connectivity software, data-driven skillsets that are needed to Smart Factory to life at scale. And, you know, lots of firms are recruiting these types of resources with these skill sets to accelerate their Smart Factory implementation, as well as consulting firms like DXC Technology and others. We recruit, we train our talent to provide these services. >> Got it. Aditi, I wonder if we could stay on you. Let's talk about the partnership between DXC and Dell. What are you doing specifically to simplify the move to Industry 4.0 for customers? What solutions are you offering? How are you working together, Dell and DXC to bring these to market? >> Yeah, Dell and DXC have a very strong partnership and we work very closely together to create solutions, to create strategies and how we are going to jointly help our clients, right? So, areas that we have worked closely together is Edge Compute, right? How that impacts the Smart Factory. So, we have worked pretty closely in that area. We're also looked at Vision Technologies. How do we use that at the Edge to improve the quality of products, right? So, we have several areas that we collaborate in and our approaches that we want to bring solutions to our client and as well as help them scale those solutions with the right infrastructure, the right talent and the right level of security. So, we bring a comprehensive solution to our clients. >> So, Todd, last question. Kind of similar but different, you know. Why Dell, DXC, pitch me? What's different about this partnership? Where are you confident that you're going to be to deliver the best value to customers? >> Absolutely. Great question. You know, there's no shortage of Bespoke Solutions that are out there. There's hundreds of people that can come in and do individual Use Cases and do these things and just, and that's where it ends. What Dell and DXC Technology together bring to the table is we do the optimization of the engineering of those previously Bespoke Solutions upfront, together. The power of our scalable enterprise grade structured industry standard infrastructure, as well as our expertise in delivering package solutions that really accelerate with DXC's expertise and reputation as a global trusted advisor. Be able to really scale and repeat those solutions that DXC is so really, really good at. And Dell's infrastructure and our, 30,000 people across the globe that are really, really good at that scalable infrastructure to be able to repeat. And then it really lessens the risk that our customers have and really accelerates those solutions. So it's again, not just one individual solutions it's all of the solutions that not just drive Use Cases but drive outcomes with those solutions. >> Yeah, you're right. The partnership has gone, I mean I first encountered it back in, I think it was 2010. May of 2010. We had guys both on the, I think you were talking about converged infrastructure and I had a customer on, and it was actually the manufacturing customer. It was quite interesting. And back then it was how do we kind of replicate what's coming in the Cloud? And you guys have obviously taken it into the digital world. Really want to thank you for your time today. Great conversation and love to have you back. >> Thank you so much. It was a pleasure speaking with you. I agree. >> All right, keep it right there for more discussions that educate and inspire on "The Cube."
SUMMARY :
Welcome back to the program. Great to be here. the manufacturing industry? and the facilities that you add to what Todd just said? and the KPIs for customer the incumbents have to continue that they need to think about. So, that's got to be a the answer to everything. of the the digital equivalent and they have a lot to offer Thank you. to apply these to these projects? and the Digital Twin. to simplify the move to and the right level of security. the best value to customers? it's all of the solutions love to have you back. Thank you so much. for more discussions that educate
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Valante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
DXC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aditi Banerjee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Todd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Todd Edmunds | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
May of 2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
DXC Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Greenfield Factories | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
52% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Aditi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
Smart Factory | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
three options | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two Use Cases | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Digital Twin | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
hundreds of people | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one factory | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Mac | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.95+ |
Aerospace | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Smart Factory | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Hoover Dam | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
Vision Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Edge Compute | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Digital Twins | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
one individual | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Smart Manufacturing Edge and | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
two Edges | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
Aerospace Defense | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
Greenfield Plants | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
Brownfield Plants | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
Cases | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.64+ |
Vice President | PERSON | 0.62+ |
General | PERSON | 0.54+ |
IIoT | ORGANIZATION | 0.52+ |
Install | ORGANIZATION | 0.51+ |
4.0 | TITLE | 0.47+ |
Cube | TITLE | 0.47+ |
Smart Factories | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
Fortune | ORGANIZATION | 0.45+ |
Factories | ORGANIZATION | 0.37+ |
4.0 | EVENT | 0.34+ |
4.0 | ORGANIZATION | 0.34+ |
Industry 4.0 | ORGANIZATION | 0.32+ |
4.0 | OTHER | 0.31+ |
500 | QUANTITY | 0.24+ |
Driving Business Results with Cloud
>> If you really want to make an impact to your business, it takes more than just moving your workloads into the cloud. So-called lift and shift is fine to reduce data center footprints and associated costs, but to really drive change, you don't want to simply "pave the cow path," as the saying goes. Rather, you need to think about the operating model, and that requires more comprehensive systems thinking. In other words, how will changes in technology affect business productivity? Or, you know what? Even flip that. What changes in my business process could lower cost, cut elapse times, and accelerate time to market, increase user productivity, and lower operational risks? And what role can technology play in supporting these mandates through modernization, automation, machine intelligence, and business resilience? And that's what we're here to discuss today. Welcome to Driving Business Results with Cloud Transformation, made Possible by Dell and DXC. My name is Dave Vellante, and today we're going to zoom out and explore many aspects of cloud transformation that leading organizations are acting on today. Yeah, sure, we're going to look at optimizing infrastructure, but we'll also dig deeper into cloud considerations, governance, compliance, and security angles, as well as the impact of emerging opportunities around edge and Industry 4.0. Our focus will be on how to remove barriers and help you achieve business outcomes. And to do this, our program features the long-term partnership between Dell and DXC. And we bring to this program six experts in three separate sessions, who are working directly with top organizations in virtually every industry to achieve high impact results. We're going to start with a conversation about cloud, the cloud operating model, and transforming key aspects of your infrastructure. And then we'll look into governance, security, and business resilience. And in our third session, we'll discuss exciting transformations that are occurring in smart manufacturing and facilities innovations. So let's get right into it with our first session. Enjoy the program. (bright music) Hello, and welcome to what is sure to be an insightful conversation about getting business results with cloud transformation. My name is Dave Vellante, and I'm here with James Miller, Chief Technologist for Cloud and Infrastructure Services, and Jay Dowling, Americas Sales Lead for Cloud and Infrastructure Services, both with DXC Technology. Gentlemen, thanks for your time today. Welcome to theCube. >> Great. Thanks for having us. >> Thank you Dave. Appreciate it. >> So let's get right into it. You know, I've talked to a lot of practitioners who've said, "Look, if you really want to drop zeros, like a lot of zeros to the bottom line, you can't just lift and shift." You really got to think about modernizing, the application portfolio. You got to think about your business model, and really think about transforming your business, particularly the operating model. So my first question, Jim, is, What role does the cloud play in modernization? >> Well, there are really three aspects that the, the cloud plays in modernization. You mentioned multiple zeros. One is cost optimization, and that can be achieved through business operations, through environmental, social, and governance. Also being more efficient with your IT investments. But that's not the only aspect. There's also agility and innovation. And that can be achieved through automation and productivity, speed to market for new features and functions, improvements in the customer experience, and the capability to metabolize a great deal more data in your environment, which the end result is an improvement in releasing of new things to the field. And finally, there's resilience. And I'm not really talking about IT resilience, but more of business resilience, to be able, to be able to handle operational risk, improve your securities and controls, deal with some of the talent gap that's in the industry, and also protect your brand reputation. So modernization is really about balancing these three aspects, cost optimization, agility and innovation, and resilience. >> So, so thank you for that. So Jay, I got to ask you, in the current climate, everybody's, you know, concerned, and there's not great visibility on the macro. So, Jim mentioned cost optimization. That seems to be one of the top areas that customers are focused on. The two I hear a lot are consolidating redundant vendors and optimizing cloud costs. So that's, you know, top of mind today. I think everybody really, you know, understands the innovation and, and, and agility piece, at least at a high level, maybe realizing it is different. And then the business resilience piece is really interesting because, you know, prior to the pandemic people, you know, they had a DR strategy, but they realized, "Wow, my business might not be that resilient." So Jay, my question to you is, What are you hearing when you talk to customers? What's the priority today? >> Yeah, the priority is an often overused term of digital transformation. You know, people want to get ready for next generation environments, customer experience, making sure they're improving, you know, how they engage with their clients and what their branding is. And what we find is a lot of clients don't have the underlying infrastructure in place today to get to where they want to get to. So cloud becomes an important element of that. But, you know, with DXC's philosophy, not everything goes to, not everything necessarily needs to go to cloud to be cost optimized, for instance. In many cases, you can run applications, you know, in your own data center, or on-prem, or in other environments, in a hybrid environment, or multi-cloud environment, and, and still be very optimized from a cost spend standpoint and also put yourself in position for modernization and for be able to do the, bring the things to the business that the clients are, you know, that their clients are looking for, like the CMO and the CFO, et cetera. Trying to use IT as a lever to drive business and to drive, you know, business acceleration and drive profitability, frankly. So there's a lot of dependency on infrastructure, but there's a lot of elements to it. And, and we advocate for, you know, there's not a single answer to that. We like to evaluate clients' environments and work with them to get them to an optimal target operating model, you know, so that they can really deliver on what the promises are for their departments. >> So if, let's talk about some of the, the barriers to realizing value in, in a context of modernization. We talked about cost optimization, agility, and, and, and resilience. But there's a business angle, and there's a technical angle here. 'Cause we always talk about people, process, and technology. Technology, oftentimes, CIOs will tell us, "Well, that's the easy part. We'll figured that out," whether it's true or not. But I agree, people and process is sometimes the tough one. So Jay, why don't you start. What do you see as the barriers, particularly from a business standpoint? >> I think people need to let their guard down and be open to the ideas that are, that are out there in the market from, you know, the, the standards that are being built by, you know, best in class models. And, and there's many people that have gone on, you know, cloud journeys and been very successful with it. There's others that have set high expectations with their business leaders that haven't necessarily met the goals that they need to meet or maybe haven't met them as quickly as they promised. So there's a, you know, there's a change management aspect that you'd need to look at with the, you know, with the environments. There's a, you know, there's a skillset set environment that they need to be prepared for. Do they have the people, you know, to deliver with the, you know, with the tools and the skills and the, and the models that that they're putting themselves in place for in the future versus where they are now? There's just a lot of, you know, there's a lot of different elements. It's not just a, "This price is better," or, "This can operate better than one environment over the other." I think we like to try to look at things holistically and make sure that, you know, we're being, you know, as much of a consultative advocate for the client, for where they want to go, what their destiny is, and based on what we've learned with other clients. You know, and we can bring those best practices forward because we've worked, you know, across such a broad spectra of clients versus them being somewhat contained and sometimes can't see outside of their own, you know, their own challenges, if you would. So they need, they need advocacy to help, you know, bring them to the next level. And we like to translate that through, you know, technology advances, which, you know, Jim's really good at doing for us. >> Yeah, Jim, is, is it, is it a, is the big barrier a skills issue, you know, bench strength? Are there other considerations from your perspective? >> Well, we, we've identified a number of factors that inhibit success of, of customers. One is thinking it's only a technology change in moving to cloud when it's much broader than that. There are changes in governance, changes in process that need to take place. The other is evaluating the cloud providers on their current pricing structure and performance. And, and we see pricing and structure changing dramatically every few months between the various cloud providers. And you have to be flexible enough to, to determine which providers you want. And it may not be feasible to just have a single cloud provider in this world. The other thing is a big bang approach to transformation, "I want to move everything, and I want to move it all at once." That's not necessarily the best approach. A well thought out cloud journey and strategy and timing your investments are really important to get at maximizing your business return on the journey to the cloud. And finally, not engaging stakeholders early and continuously. You have to manage expectations in moving to cloud on what business factors will get affected, how you will achieve your cost savings, and, and how you will achieve the business impact over the journey and reporting out on that with very strict metrics to all of the stakeholders. >> You know, mentioned multi-cloud just then. We had, in January 17th, we had our Supercloud 2 event. And Supercloud is basically, it's really multi, what multi-cloud should have been, I, I like to say. So it's this creating a common experience across clouds. And you guys were talking about, you know, there's different governance, there's different security, there's different pricing. So, and, and one of the takeaways from this event in talking to customers and practitioners and technologists is, you can't go it alone. So I wonder if you could talk about your partnership strategy, what do partners bring to the table, and what is, what is DXC's, you know, unique value? >> I'd be happy to lead with that if you'd like. >> Great. >> I, you know, we've got a vast partner ecosystem at DXC, given the size and, and the history of the company. I could use several examples. One of the larger partners in my particular space is Dell Technology, right? They're a great, you know, partner for us across many different areas of the business. It's not just a storage and compute play anymore. They're, they're on the edge. They're, you know, they're, they've got intelligence in their networking devices now. And they've really brought, you know, a lot of value to us as a partner. And, you know, there, there's somebody, you could look at Dell technology as somebody that might, you know, have a victim, you know, effect because of all the hyperscale activity and all the cloud activity. But they've really taken an outstanding attitude with this and say, "Listen, not all things are destined for cloud, or not all things would operate better in a cloud environment." And they like to be part of those discussions to see how they can, you know, how we can bring a multi-cloud environment, you know, both private and public, you know, to clients. And let's look at the applications and the infrastructure and, and what's, you know, what's the best optimal running environment, you know, for us to be able to bring, you know, the greatest value to the business with speed, with security, with, you know. And, you know, the things that they want to keep closest to the business are often things that you want to kind of, you know, keep on your premise or keep in your own data center. So they're, they're an ideal model of somebody that's resourced us well, partners with us well in the market. And, and we continue to grow that relationship day in and day out with those guys. And we really appreciate, you know, their support of our strategy, and, and we like to also compliment their strategy and work, you know, work together hand in hand in front of our clients. >> Yeah, you know, Jim, Matt Baker, who's the head of strategic planning at Dell talks about, "It's not a zero sum game." And I think, you know, you're right, Jay. I think initially people felt like, "Oh wow, it's, it is a zero sum game." But it's clearly not, and this idea of of, whether you call it supercloud or ubercloud or multicloud, clearly Dell is headed in in that direction. And I, you know, look at some of their future projects. There's their narrative. I'm curious from a technology standpoint, Jim, what your role is. Is it to make it all work? Is it to, you know, end to end? I wonder if you could help, you know, us understand that. >> Help us figure this out, Jim, here. (group laughing) >> Glad to expand on that. One of my key roles is developing our product roadmap for DXC offerings. And we do that roadmap in conjunction with our partners where we can leverage the innovation that our partners bring to the table. And we often utilize engineering resources from our partners to help us jointly build those offerings that adapt to changes in the market and also adapt to many of our customers changing needs over time. So my primary role is to look at the market, talk to our customers, and work with our partners to develop a product roadmap for delivering DXC products and services to our clients so that they can get the return on investment on their technology journeys. >> You know, we've been working with these two firms for a while now. Even predates, you know, the, the name DXC and that, that transformation. I'm curious as to what's, how you would respond to, "What's unique?" You know, you hear a lot about partnerships. You guys got a lot of competition. Dell has a lot of competition. What's specifically unique about this combination? >> I think, go ahead, Jim. >> I would say our unique approach, we call it cloud right. And that, that approach is making the right investments, at the right time, and on the right platforms. And our partners play a, play a key role in that. So we, we encourage our customers to not necessarily have a cloud first approach, but a cloud right approach where they place the workloads in the environment that is best suited from a technology perspective, a business perspective, and even a security and governance perspective. And, and the right approach might include mainframe. It might include an on-premises infrastructure. It could include private cloud, public cloud, and SaaS components all integrated together to deliver that value. >> Yeah, Jay, please. >> If you were... >> That is a complicated situation for a lot of customers. Chime in here. (Jay chuckles) >> And now, if you were speaking specifically to Dell here, like they, they also walk the talk, right? They invest in DXC as a partnership. They put people on the ground that their only purpose in life is to help DXC succeed with Dell in, you know, arm in arm in front of clients. And it's not, you know, it's not a winner take all thing at all. It's really a true partnership. They, they, they've brought solution resources. We have an account CTO. We've got executive sponsorship. We do regular QBR meetings. We have regular executive touchpoint meetings. It's really important that you keep a high level of intimacy with the client, with the partners, you know, and, and the, and the GSI community. And I, I've been with several GSIs, and, and this is an exceptional example of true partnership and commitment to success with Dell technology. I'm really extremely impressed on, on the engagement level that we've had there and, you know, continue to show a lot of support, you know, both for them. You know, there's other OEM partners, of course, in the market. There's always going to be other technology solutions for certain clients, but this has been a particularly strong element for us in our partnership and in our go-to-market strategy. >> Well, I think too, just my observation, is a lot of it's about trust. You guys have both earned the trust, the kind of, over the, over the years taking your arrows, you know, of over decades. And, and you know, that just doesn't happen overnight. So guys, I appreciate it. Thanks for your time. It's all about getting cloud right, isn't it? >> That's right. (chuckles) (Dave chuckles) >> Thank you Dave. Appreciate it very much. >> Dave, thank you. >> Jay, Jim, great to have you on. Keep it right there for more action on theCube. Be right back. (upbeat guitar music) (keyboard clicks) Welcome back to the program. My name is Dave Vellante, and in this session we're going to explore one of the more interesting topics of the day. IoT for smart factories and with me are Todd Edmunds, the Global CTO of Smart Manufacturing Edge and Digital Twins at Dell Technologies. That is such a cool title. (Todd chuckles) I want to be you. And Dr. Aditi Banerjee who's the Vice President, General Manager for Aerospace Defense and Manufacturing at DXC Technology. Another really cool title. Folks, welcome to the program. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you. >> Thanks, Dave. Great to be here. >> Nice to be here. So, Todd, let's start with you. We hear a lot about Industry 4.0, smart factories, IIoT. Can you briefly explain like what is Industry 4.0 all about, and why is it important for the manufacturing industry? >> Yeah, sure, Dave. You know, it's been around for quite a while. And it's got, it's gone by multiple different names, as you said, Industry 4.0, smart manufacturing, industrial IoT, smart factory, but it all really means the same thing. Its really applying technology to get more out of the factories and the facilities that you have to do your manufacturing. So being much more efficient, implementing really good sustainability initiatives. And so we really look at that by saying, "Okay, what are we going to do with technology to really accelerate what we've been doing for a long, long time?" So it's really not, it's not new. It's been around for a long time. What's new is that manufacturers are looking at this not as a one-off, two-off, individual use case point of view. But instead they're saying, "We really need to look at this holistically, thinking about a strategic investment in how we do this, not to just enable one or two use cases, but enable many, many use cases across the spectrum." I mean, there's tons of them out there. There's predictive maintenance, and there's OEE, overall equipment effectiveness, and there's computer vision. And all of these things are starting to percolate down to the factory floor. But it needs to be done in a little bit different way. And, and, and really, to really get those outcomes that they're looking for in smart factory, or Industry 4.0, or however you want to call it, and truly transform. Not just throw an Industry 4.0 use case out there, but to do the digital transformation that's really necessary and to be able to stay relevant for the future. You know, I heard it once said that you have three options. Either you digitally transform and stay relevant for the future, or you don't and fade into history like 52% of the companies that used to be on the Fortune 500 since 2000, right? And so really that's a key thing, and we're seeing that really, really being adopted by manufacturers all across the globe. >> Yeah so, Aditi, that's like digital transformation is almost synonymous with business transformation. So is there anything you'd add to what Todd just said? >> Absolutely. Though, I would really add that what really drives Industry 4.0 is the business transformation, what we are able to deliver in terms of improving the manufacturing KPIs and the KPIs for customer satisfaction, right? For example, improving the downtime, you know, or decreasing the maintenance cycle of the equipments, or improving the quality of products, right? So I think these are a lot of business outcomes that our customers are looking at while using Industry 4.0 and the technologies of Industry 4.0 to deliver these outcomes. >> So Aditi, I wonder if I could stay with you. And maybe this is a bit esoteric. But when I first started researching IoT and, and, and Industrial IoT 4.0, et cetera, I felt, you know, while there could be some disruptions in the ecosystem, I kind of came to the conclusion that large manufacturing firms, aerospace defense companies, the firms building out critical infrastructure, actually had kind of an incumbent advantage in a great opportunity. Of course, then I saw on TV, somebody now they're building homes with 3D printers. Its like, blows your mind. So that's pretty disruptive, but, so, but they got to continue. The incumbents have to continue to invest in the future. They're well capitalized. They're pretty good businesses, very good businesses. But there's a lot of complexities involved in kind of connecting the old house to the new addition that's being built, if you will, or this transformation that we're talking about. So my question is, How are your customers preparing for this new era? What are the key challenges that they're facing and the, the blockers, if you will? >> Yeah, I mean the customers are looking at Industry 4.0 for greenfield factories, right? That is where the investments are going directly into building the factories with the new technologies, with the new connectivities, right, for the machines. For example, industrial IoT, having the right type of data platforms to drive computational analytics and outcomes, as well as looking at edge versus cloud type of technologies, right? Those are all getting built in the greenfield factories. However, for the install-based factories, right, that is where our customers are looking at, "How do I modernize these factories? How do I connect the existing machine?" And that is where some of the challenges come in on, you know, the legacy system connectivity that they need to think about. Also, they need to start thinking about cybersecurity and operation technology security, right, because now you are connecting the factories to each other, right? So cybersecurity becomes top of mind, right? So there is definitely investment that is involved. Clients are creating roadmaps for digitizing and modernizing these factories and investments in a very strategic way, right? So perhaps they start with the innovation program, and then they look at the business case, and they scale it up, right? >> Todd, I'm glad Aditi brought up security. Because if you think about the operations technology, you know, folks, historically, they air gapped, you know, the systems. That's how they created security. That's changed. The business came in and said, "Hey, we got to, we got to connect. We got to make it intelligent." So that's, that's got to be a big challenge as well. >> It, it, it absolutely is Dave. And, and you know, you can no longer just segment that because really, to get all of those efficiencies that we talk about, that IoT and Industrial IoT and Industry 4.0 promise, you have to get data out of the factory. But then you got to put data back in the factory. So no longer is it just firewalling everything is really the answer. So you really have to have a comprehensive approach to security, but you also have to have a comprehensive approach to the cloud and what that means. And does it mean a continuum of cloud all the way down to the edge, right down to the factory? It absolutely does because no one approach has the answer to everything. The more you go to the cloud, the broader the attack surface is. So what we're seeing is a lot of our customers approaching this from a, kind of that, that hybrid, you know, "write once, run anywhere" on the factory floor down to the edge. And one of the things we're seeing, too, is to help distinguish between what is the edge, and that, and, and bridge that gap between, like Dave, you talked about IT and OT. And also help that, what Aditi talked about, is the greenfield plants versus the brownfield plants that they call it, that are the legacy ones and modernizing those. Is, it's great to kind of start to delineate. What does that mean? Where's the edge? Where's the IT and the OT? We see that from a couple of different ways. We start to think about really two edges in a manufacturing floor. We talk about an industrial edge that sits, or some people call it a far edge or a thin edge, sits way down on that plan. It consists of industrial hardened devices that do that connectivity. The hard stuff about, "How do I connect to this obsolete legacy protocol and what do I do with it?" And create that next generation of data that has context. And then we see another edge evolving above that, which is much more of a data and analytics and enterprise grade application layer that sits down in the factory itself that helps figure out where we're going to run this. Does it connect to the cloud? Do we run applications on-prem? Because a lot of times that on-prem application is, is, needs to be done because that's the only way that its going to, it's going to work because of security requirements, because of latency requirements, performance, and a lot of times cost. It's really helpful to build that multiple edge strategy because then you kind of, you consolidate all of those resources, applications, infrastructure, hardware, into a centralized location. Makes it much, much easier to really deploy and manage that security. But it also makes it easier to deploy new applications, new use cases, and become the foundation for DXC's expertise and applications that they deliver to our customers as well. >> Todd, how complex are these projects? I mean, I feel like it's kind of the, the digital equivalent of building the Hoover Dam. I mean, it, it, it's, (chuckles) it, it, so. Yeah, how long does a typical project take? I know it varies, but what, you know, what are the critical success factors in terms of delivering business value quickly? >> Yeah, that's a great question in that, in that we're, you know, like I said at the beginning, we, this is not new. Smart factory and Industry 4.0 is not new. It's been, it's, people have been trying to implement the holy grail of smart factory for a long time. And what we're seeing is a switch, a little bit of a switch, or quite a bit of a switch, to where the enterprise and the IT folks are having a much bigger say and have a lot to offer to be able to help that complexity. So instead of deploying a computer here, and a gateway there, and a server there, I mean, you go walk into any manufacturing plant and you can see servers sitting underneath someone's desk or a, or a PC in a closet somewhere running a critical production application. So we're seeing the enterprise have a much bigger say at the table, much louder voice at the table to say, "We've been doing this at enterprise all the time. We, we know how to really consolidate, bring hyper-converged applications, hyper-converged infrastructure, to really accelerate these kind of applications, really accelerate the outcomes that are needed to really drive that smart factory, and start to bring that same capabilities down into the, on the factory floor." That way, if you do it once to make it easier to implement, you can repeat that. You can scale that. You can manage it much easily. And you can then bring that all together because you have the security in one centralized location. So we're seeing manufacturers, yeah, that first use case may be fairly difficult to implement and we got to go down in and see exactly what their problems are. But when the infrastructure is done the correct way, when that, think about how you're going to run that and how are you going to optimize the engineering. Well, let's take that, what you've done in that one factory, and then set. Let's that, make that across all the factories, including the factory that we're in, but across the globe. That makes it much, much easier. You really do the hard work once and then repeat, almost like a cookie cutter. >> Got it. Thank you. Aditi, what about the skillsets available to apply these, to these projects? You got to have knowledge of digital, AI, data, integration. Is there a talent shortage to get all this stuff done? >> Yeah, I mean definitely, a lot. Different types of skillsets are needed from a traditional manufacturing skillset, right? Of course, the basic knowledge of manufacturing is, is important. But the, the digital skillset sets like, you know, IoT, having a skillset in different protocols for connecting the machines, right, that experience that comes with it, data and analytics, security, augmented virtual reality programming. You know, again, looking at robotics and the digital twin. So you know, it's a lot more connectivity software, data driven skillsets that are needed to smart factory to life at scale. And, you know, lots of firms are, you know, recruiting these types of skill, resources with these skillsets to, you know, accelerate their smart factory implementation, as well as consulting firms like DXC Technology and others. We, we, we recruit. We, we train our talent to, to provide these services. >> Got it. Aditi, I wonder if we could stay on you. Let's talk about the partnership between DXC and Dell. What are you doing specifically to simplify the move to Industry 4.0 for customers? What solutions are you offering? How are you working together, Dell and DXC, to, to bring these to market? >> Yeah, Dell and DXC have a very strong partnership. You know, and we work very closely together to, to create solutions, to create strategies, and how we, we are going to jointly help our clients, right? So areas that we have worked closely together is edge compute, right, how that impacts the smart factory. So we have worked pretty closely in that area. We're also looked at vision technologies, you know. How do we use that at the edge to improve the quality of products, right? So we have several areas that we collaborate in. And our approach is that we, we want to bring solutions to our client, and as well as help them scale those solutions with the right infrastructure, the right talent, and the right level of security. So we bring a comprehensive solution to our clients. >> So, Todd, last question, kind of similar but different. You know, why Dell DXC? Pitch me. What's different about this partnership? You know, where do you, are you confident that, you know, you're going to be, deliver the best value to, to customers? >> Absolutely. Great question. You know, there's no shortage of bespoke solutions that are out there. There's hundreds of people that can come in and do individual use cases and do these things. And just, and, and, and that's, that's where it ends. What Dell and DXC Technology together bring to the table is, we do the optimization, the optimization of the engineering of those previously bespoke solutions upfront, together, right? The power of our scalables, enterprise-grade, structured, you know, industry standard infrastructure, as well as our expertise in delivering package solutions that really accelerate with DXC's expertise and reputation as a global, trusted, trusted advisor. Be able to really scale and repeat those solutions that DXC is so really, really good at. And, and Dell's infrastructure, and our, what, 30,000 people across the globe that are really, really good at that, at that scalable infrastructure, to be able to repeat. And then it really lessens the risk that our customers have and really accelerates those solutions. So it's again, not just one individual solutions, it's all of the solutions that not just drive use cases, but drive outcomes with those solutions. >> Yeah, the, you're right, the partnership has gone, I mean, I first encountered it back in, I think it was 2010, May of 2010, we had you, you guys both on theCube. I think you were talking about converged infrastructure. And I had a customer on, and it was, actually a manufacturing customer, was quite interesting. And back then it was, "How do we kind of replicate what's coming in the cloud?" And, and you guys have obviously taken it into the digital world. Really want to thank you for your time today. Great conversation, and love to have you back. >> Thank you so much. >> Absolutely. >> It was a pleasure speaking with you. >> I agree. >> All right, keep it right there for more discussions that educate and inspire on theCube. (bright music) Welcome back to the program and we're going to dig into the number one topic on the minds of every technology organization. That's cybersecurity. You know, survey data from ETR, our data partner, shows that among CIOs and IT decision makers, cybersecurity continues to rank as the number one technology priority to be addressed in the coming year. That's ahead of even cloud migration and analytics. And with me to discuss this critical topic area are Jim Shook, who's the Global Director of Cybersecurity and Compliance Practice at Dell Technologies, and he's joined by Andrew Gonzalez, who focuses on Cloud and Infrastructure consulting at DXC Technology. Gents, welcome. Good to have you. >> Thanks Dave. Great to be here. >> Thank you. >> Jim, let's start with you. What are you seeing from the front lines in terms of the attack surface, and, and how are customers responding these days? >> It's always up and down and back and forth. The bad actors are smart. They adapt to everything that we do. So we're seeing more and more kind of living off the land. They're not necessarily deploying malware. Makes it harder to find what they're doing. And I think though, Dave, we've, we've adapted, and this whole notion of cyber resilience really helps our customers figure this out. And the idea there goes beyond cybersecurity, it's, "Let's protect as much as possible, so we keep the bad actors out as much as we can. But then, let's have the ability to adapt to and recover to the extent that the bad actors are successful." So we're recognizing that we can't be perfect a hundred percent of the time against a hundred percent of the bad actors. Let's keep out what we can, but then recognize and have that ability to recover when necessary. >> Yeah, thank you. So Andrew, you know, I like what Jim was saying about living off the land, of course, meaning using your own tooling against you, kind of hiding in plain sight, if you will. But, and, and as Jim is saying, you, you can't be perfect. But, so given that, what's your perspective on what good cybersecurity hygiene looks like? >> Yeah, so you have to understand what your crown jewel data looks like, what a good copy of a recoverable asset looks like. When you look at an attack, if it were to occur, right, how you get that copy of data back into production. And not only that, but what that golden image actually entails. So, whether it's networking, storage, some copy of a source code, intellectual property, maybe CMBD data, or an active directory, or DNS dump, right? Understanding what your data actually entails so that you can protect it and that you can build out your recovery plan for it. >> So, and where's that live? Where's that gold copy? You put on a yellow sticky? No, it's got to be, (chuckles) you got to be somewhere safe, right? So you have to think about that chain as well, right? >> Absolutely. Yeah. You, so, a lot of folks have not gone through the exercise of identifying what that golden copy looks like. Everyone has a DR scenario, everyone has a DR strategy, but actually identifying what that golden crown jewel data, let's call it, actually entails is one aspect of it. And then where to put it, how to protect it, how to make it immutable and isolated, that's the other portion of it. >> You know, if I go back to sort of earlier part of last decade, you know, cybersecurity was kind of a checkoff item. And as you got toward the middle part of the decade, and I'd say clearly by 2016, it, security became a boardroom issue. It was on the agenda, you know, every quarter at the board meetings. So compliance is no longer the driver, is, is my point. The driver is business risk, real loss of reputation or data, you know, it's, or money, et cetera. What are the business implications of not having your cyber house in order today? >> They're extreme, Dave. I mean the, you know, the bad actors are good at what they do. These losses by organizations, tens, hundreds of millions into the billions sometimes, plus the reputational damage that's difficult to, to really measure. There haven't been a lot of organizations that have actually been put out of business by an attack, at least not directly on, if they're larger organizations. But that's also on the table, too. So you can't just rely on, "Oh we need to do, you know, A, B and C because our regulators require it." You need to look at what the actual risk is to the business, and then come up with a strategy from there. >> You know, Jim, staying with you, one of the most common targets we hear of attackers is to go after the backup corpus. So how should customers think about protecting themselves from that tactic? >> Well, Dave, you hit on it before, right? Everybody's had the backup and DR strategies for a long time going back to requirements that we had in place for physical disaster or human error. And that's a great starting point for resilience capability. But that's all it is, is a starting point. Because the bad actors will, they also understand that you have those capabilities, and, and they've adapted to that. In every sophisticated attack that we see, the backup is a target. The bad actors want to take it out, or corrupt it, or do something else to that backup so that it's not available to you. That's not to say they're always successful, and it's still a good control to have in place because maybe it will survive. But you have to plan beyond that. So the capabilities that we talk about with resilience, let's harden that backup infrastructure. You've already got it in place. Let's use the capabilities that are there like immutability and other controls to make it more difficult for the bad actors to get to. But then as Andrew said, that gold copy, that critical systems, you need to protect that in something that's more secure, which commonly we, we might say a cyber vault. Although, there's a lot of different capabilities for cyber vaulting, some far better than others, and that's some of the things that we focus on. >> You know, it's interesting, but I've talked to a lot of CIOs about this, is prior to the pandemic, they, you know, had their, as you're pointing out, Jim, they had their DR strategy in place, but they felt like they weren't business resilient. And they realized that when we had the forced march to digital. So Andrew, are there solutions out there to help with this problem? Do you guys have an answer to this? >> Yeah, absolutely. So I'm glad you brought up resiliency. We, we take a position that to be cyber resilient, it includes operational resiliency. It includes understanding at the C level what the implication of an attack means, as we stated, and then, how to recover back into production. When you look at protecting that data, not only do you want to put it into what we call a vault, which is a Dell technology that is an offline immutable copy of your crown jewel data, but also how to recover it in real time. So DXC offers a, I don't want to call it a turnkey solution since we architect these specific to each client needs, right, when we look at what client data entails, their recovery point, objectives, recovery time objectives, what we call quality of the restoration. But when we architect these out, we look at not only how to protect the data, but how to alert and monitor for attacks in real time, how to understand what we should do when a breach is in progress, putting together with our security operations centers, a forensic and recovery plan and a runbook for the client, and then being able to cleanse and remediate so that we can get that data back into production. These are all services that DXC offers in conjunction with the Dell solution to protect, and recover, and keep bad actors out. And if we can't keep them out to ensure that we are back into production in short order. >> You know, this, this discussion we've been having about DR kind of versus resilience, and, and you were just talking about RPO and RTO. I mean, it used to be that a lot of firms wouldn't even test their recovery 'cause it was too risky. Or, you know, maybe they tested it on, you know, July 4th or something like that. But, but it, I'm inferring that's changed. I wonder if we could, you know, double click on recovery? How hard is it to, to, to test that recovery, and, and how quickly are you seeing organizations recover from attacks? >> So it depends, right, on the industry vertical, what kind of data. Again, a financial services client compared to a manufacturing client are going to be two separate conversations. We've seen it as quickly as being able to recover in six hours, in 12 hours. In some instances we have the grace period of a day to a couple of days. We do offer the ability to run scenarios once a quarter where we can stand up in our systems the production data that we are protecting to ensure that we have a good recoverable copy. But it depends on the client. >> I really like the emphasis here, Dave, that you're raising and that Andrew's talking about. It's not on the technology of how the data gets protected. It's focused on the recovery. That's all that we want to do. And so the solution with DXC really focuses on generating that recovery for customers. I think where people get a little bit twisted up on their testing capability is, you have to think about different scenarios. So there are scenarios where the attack might be small. It might be limited to a database or an application. It might be really broadly based like the NotPetya attacks from a few years ago. The regulatory environment, we call those attacks severe but plausible. So you can't necessarily test everything with the infrastructure, but you can test some things with the infrastructure. Others, you might sit around on a tabletop exercise or walk through what that looks like to really get that, that recovery kind of muscle, muscle memory so that people know what to do when those things occur. But the key to it, as Andrew said before, have to focus down, "What are those critical applications? What do we need, what's most important? What has to come back first?" And that really will go a long way towards having the right recovery points and recovery times from a cyber disaster. >> Yeah, makes sense. Understanding the value of that data is going to inform you how to, how to respond and how to prioritize. Andrew, one of the things that we hear a lot on theCube, especially lately, is around, you know, IOT, IIOT, Industry 4.0, the whole OT security piece of it. And the problem being that, you know, traditionally, operations technologies have been air gapped, often by design. But as businesses, increasingly they're driving initiatives like Industry 4.0, and they're connecting these OT systems to IT systems. They're, you know, driving efficiency, preventative maintenance, et cetera. So a lot of data flowing through the pipes, if you will. What are you seeing in terms of the threats to critical infrastructure and how should customers think about addressing these issues? >> Yeah, so bad actors, you know, can come in many forms. We've seen instances of social engineering. We've seen, you know, a USB stick dropped in a warehouse. That data that is flowing through the IoT device is as sensitive now as your core mainframe infrastructure data. So when you look at it from a protection standpoint, conceptually, it's not dissimilar from what we've been been talking about where you want to understand, again, what the most critical data is. Looking at IoT data and applications is no different than your core systems now, right? Depending on what your, your business is, right? So when, when we're looking at protecting these, yes, we want firewalls, yes, we want air gap solutions, yes, we want front end protection, but we're looking at it from a resiliency perspective. Putting that data, understanding what what data entails to put in the vault from an IoT perspective is just as critical as as it is for your core systems. >> Jim, anything you can add to this topic? >> Yeah, I think you hit on the, the key points there. Everything is interconnected. So even in the days where maybe people thought the OT systems weren't online, oftentimes the IT systems are talking to them, or controlling them, SCADA systems, or perhaps supporting them. Think back to the pipeline attack of last year. All the public testimony was that the OT systems didn't get attacked directly. But there was uncertainty around that, and the IT systems hadn't been secured. So that caused the OT systems to have to shut down. It certainly is a different recovery when you're shutting them down on your own versus being attacked, but the outcome was the same that the business couldn't operate. So you really have to take all of those into account. And I think that does go back to exactly what Andrew's saying, understanding your critical business services, and then the applications and data and other components that support those and drive those, and making sure those are protected. You understand them, you have the ability to recover them if necessary. >> So guys, I mean, you made the point. I mean, you're right. The adversary is highly capable. They're motivated 'cause the ROI is so, it's so lucrative. It's like this never ending battle that cybersecurity pros, you know, go through. It really is kind of frontline sort of technical heroes, if you will. And so, but sometimes it just feels daunting. Why are you optimistic about the future of, of cyber from the good guy's perspective? >> I think we're coming at the problem the right way, Dave. So that, that focus, I'm so pleased with the idea that we are planning that the systems aren't going to be hundred percent capable every single time, and let's figure that out, right? That's, that's real world stuff. So just as the bad actors continue to adapt and expand, so do we. And I think the differences there, the common criminals, it's getting harder and harder for them. The more sophisticated ones, they're tough to beat all the time. And of course, you've raised the question of some nation states and other activities. But there's a lot more information sharing. There's a lot more focus from the business side of the house and not just the IT side of the house that we need to figure these things out. >> Yeah, to, to add to that, I think furthering education for the client base is important. You, you brought up a point earlier. It used to be a boardroom conversation due to compliance reasons. Now, as we have been in the market for a while, we continue to mature the offerings. It's further education for not only the business itself, but for the IT systems and how they interconnect, and working together so that these systems can be protected and continue to be evolved and continue to be protected through multiple frameworks as opposed to seeing it as another check the box item that the board has to adhere to. >> All right, guys, we got to go. Thank you so much. Great conversation on a, on a really important topic. Keep up the good work. Appreciate it. >> Thanks Dan. >> Thank you. >> All right, and thank you for watching. Stay tuned for more excellent discussions around the partnership between Dell Technologies and DXC Technology. We're talking about solving real world problems, how this partnership has evolved over time, really meeting the changing enterprise landscape challenges. Keep it right there. (bright music) Okay, we hope you enjoyed the program and learned some things about cloud transformation and modernizing your business that will inspire you to action. Now if you want to learn more, go to the Dell DXC partner page shown here, or click on the URL in the description. Thanks for watching everybody and on behalf of our supporters, Dell and DXC, good luck. And as always, get in touch if we can be of any assistance. (bright music)
SUMMARY :
and help you achieve business outcomes. Thanks for having us. You really got to think about modernizing, in releasing of new things to the field. So Jay, my question to you is, and to drive, you know, the barriers to realizing value to deliver with the, you know, on the journey to the cloud. you know, unique value? I'd be happy to lead to kind of, you know, keep on your premise And I think, you know, you're right, Jay. Help us figure this out, Jim, here. that our partners bring to the table. Even predates, you know, the, the name DXC And, and the right approach Chime in here. the partners, you know, And, and you know, that just That's right. Thank you Dave. Jay, Jim, great to have you on. Great to be here. Nice to be here. that you have to do your manufacturing. add to what Todd just said? the downtime, you know, and the, the blockers, if you will? that they need to think about. they air gapped, you know, the systems. on the factory floor down to the edge. I know it varies, but what, you know, in that we're, you know, You got to have knowledge of So you know, it's a lot to simplify the move and the right level of security. that, you know, you're going to be, it's all of the solutions love to have you back. to be addressed in the coming year. What are you seeing from the front lines and have that ability to So Andrew, you know, I and that you can build out how to make it immutable and isolated, of last decade, you know, "Oh we need to do, you know, A, B and C to go after the backup corpus. for the bad actors to get to. they, you know, had their, and then being able to on, you know, July 4th We do offer the ability to But the key to it, as Andrew said before, to inform you how to, how to We've seen, you know, a USB So that caused the OT you know, go through. and not just the IT side of the house that the board has to adhere to. Thank you so much. that will inspire you to action.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andrew Gonzalez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andrew | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim Shook | PERSON | 0.99+ |
James Miller | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jay Dowling | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Todd Edmunds | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt Baker | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Aditi Banerjee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DXC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Todd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
January 17th | DATE | 0.99+ |
first session | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
July 4th | DATE | 0.99+ |
12 hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
third session | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
52% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
six experts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DXC Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tens | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ubercloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aditi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
May of 2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Driving Business Results with Cloud Transformation - Aditi Banerjee and Todd Edmunds
>> Welcome back to the program. My name is Dave Vellante and in this session we're going to explore one of the more interesting topics of the day. IoT for smart factories and with me are Todd Edmunds, the global CTO of Smart Manufacturing, Edge and Digital Twins, at Dell Technologies. That is such a cool title. (Todd laughs) I want to be you. And Dr. Aditi Banerjee, who's the Vice President General Manager for Aerospace Defense and Manufacturing at DXC Technology. Another really cool title. Folks, welcome to the program. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks Dave. >> Thank you. Great to be here. >> Well- >> Nice to be here. >> Todd, let's start with you. We hear a lot about Industry 4.0, smart factories, IIoT. Can you briefly explain, like, what is Industry 4.0 all about and why is it important for the manufacturing industry? >> Yeah, sure Dave. You know, it's been around for quite a while and it's got, it's gone by multiple different names. As you said, Industry 4.0, smart manufacturing, industrial IoT, smart factory. But it all really means the same thing. It's really applying technology to get more out of the factories and the facilities that you have to do your manufacturing. So being much more efficient. Implementing really good sustainability initiatives. And so we really look at that by saying, "Okay, what are we going to do with technology to really accelerate what we've been doing for a long, long time"? So it's really not, it's not new. It's been around for a long time. What's new is that manufacturers are looking at this, not as a one-off, two off individual use case point of view, but instead they're saying, "We really need to look at this holistically, thinking about a strategic investment in how we do this." Not to just enable one or two use cases, but enable many, many use cases across the spectrum. I mean, there's tons of 'em out there. There's predictive maintenance and there's OEE, overall equipment effectiveness, and there's computer vision. And all of these things are starting to percolate down to the factory floor, but it needs to be done in a little bit different way. And really to to really get those outcomes that they're looking for in smart factory, or Industry 4.0, or however you want to call it. And truly transform. Not just throw an Industry 4.0 use case out there, but to do the digital transformation that's really necessary and to be able to stay relevant for the future. You know, I heard it once said that you have three options. Either you digitally transform and stay relevant for the future or you don't and fade into history like 52% of the companies that used to be on the Fortune 500 since 2000, right. And so really that's a key thing and we're seeing that really, really being adopted by manufacturers all across the globe. >> Yeah, so Aditi, that's like digital transformation is almost synonymous with business transformation. So is there anything you'd add to what Todd just said? >> Absolutely, though, I would really add that what really drives Industry 4.0 is the business transformation. What we are able to deliver in terms of improving the manufacturing KPIs and the KPIs for customer satisfaction, right. For example, improving the downtime, you know, or decreasing the maintenance cycle of the equipments or improving the quality of products, right. So I think these are lot of business outcomes that our customers are looking at while using Industry 4.0 and the technologies of Industry 4.0 to deliver these outcomes. >> So Aditi, one, if I could stay with you and maybe this is a bit esoteric, but when I first started researching IoT and Industrial IoT 4.0, et cetera, I felt, you know, while there could be some disruptions in the ecosystem, I kind of came to the conclusion that large manufacturing firms, aerospace defense companies, the firms building out critical infrastructure, actually had kind of an incumbent advantage and a great opportunity. Of course, then I saw on TV, somebody now, they're building homes with 3D printers. It like blows your mind. So that's pretty disruptive. But. So, but they got to continue, the incumbents have to continue to invest in the future. They're well capitalized. They're pretty good businesses. Very good businesses. But there's a lot of complexities involved in kind of connecting the old house to the new addition that's being built, if you will. Or there's transformation that we're talking about. So my question is how are your customers preparing for this new era? What are the key challenges that they're facing in the blockers, if you will? >> Yeah, I mean the customers are looking at Industry 4.0 for greenfield factories, right. That is where the investments are going directly into building the factories with the new technologies with the new connectivities, right, for the machines, for example. Industry IoT, Having the right type of data platforms to drive computational analytics and outcomes, as well as looking at edge versus cloud type of technologies, right. Those are all getting built in the greenfield factories. However, for the install-based factories, right, that is where our customers are looking at how do I modernize, right. These factories. How do I connect the existing machine? And that is where some of the challenges come in on, you know, the legacy system connectivity that they need to think about. Also, they need to start thinking about cybersecurity and operation technology security, right, because now you are connecting the factories to each other, right. So cybersecurity becomes top of mind, right. So there is definitely investment that is involved. Clients are creating roadmaps for digitizing and modernizing these factories and investments in a very strategic way, right. So perhaps they start with the innovation program. And then they look at the business case and they scale it up, right. >> Todd, I'm glad Aditi brought up security because if you think about the operations technology, you know folks, historically they air gapped, you know, the systems. That's how they created security. That's changed. The business came in and said, "Hey, we got to connect. We got to make it intelligent." So that's got to be a big challenge as well. >> It absolutely is Dave. And, you know, you can no longer just segment that because really to get all of those efficiencies that we talk about, that IOT and industrial IoT and Industry 4.0 promise, you have to get data out of the factory but then you got to put data back in the factory. So no longer is it just firewalling everything is really the answer. So you really have to have a comprehensive approach to security, but you also have to have a comprehensive approach to the cloud and what that means. And does it mean a continuum of cloud all the way down to the edge, right down to the factory? It absolutely does because no one approach has the answer to everything. The more you go to the cloud, the broader the attack surface is. So what we're seeing is a lot of our customers approaching this from, kind of, that hybrid, you know, write once, run anywhere on the factory floor down to the edge. And one of things we're seeing too is to help distinguish between what is the edge and that. And bridge that gap between, like Dave, you talked about IT and OT, and also help that what Aditi talked about is the greenfield plants versus the brownfield plants, that they call it, that are the legacy ones and modernizing those, is it's great to kind of start to delineate. What does that mean? Where's the edge? Where's the IT and the OT? We see that from a couple of different ways. We start to think about, really, two edges in a manufacturing floor. We talk about an industrial edge that sits, or some people call it a far edge or a thin edge, sits way down on that plant. Consists of industrial hardened devices that do that connectivity, the hard stuff, about how do I connect to this obsolete legacy protocol and what do I do with it? And create that next generation of data that has context. And then we see another edge evolving above that which is much more of a data and analytics and enterprise grade application layer that sits down in the factory itself that helps figure out where we're going to run this. Is... Does it connect to the cloud? Do we run applications on-prem? Because a lot of times that on-prem application is needs to be done because that's the only way it's going to work. Because of security requirements. Because of latency requirements, performance, and a lot of times, cost. It's really helpful to build that multiple edge strategy because then you consolidate all of those resources, applications, infrastructure, hardware, into a centralized location. Makes it much, much easier to really deploy and manage that security. But it also makes it easier to deploy new applications, new use cases, and become the foundation for DXC's expertise in applications that they deliver to our customers as well. >> Todd, how complex are these projects? I mean, I feel like it's kind of the digital equivalent of building the Hoover Dam. I mean, it... So, yeah, how long does a typical project take? I know it varies, but what, you know, what are the critical success factors in terms of delivering business value quickly? >> Yeah, that's a great question in that we're, you know, like I said at the beginning, this is not new smart factory and Industry 4.0 is not new. It's been... It's people have been trying to implement the holy grail of smart factory for a long time. And what we're seeing is a switch, a little bit of a switch or quite a bit of a switch, to where the enterprise and the IT folks are having a much bigger say and have a lot to offer to be able to help that complexity. So instead of deploying a computer here and a gateway there and a server there. I mean, you go walk into any manufacturing plant and you can see servers sitting underneath someone's desk or a PC in a closet somewhere running a a critical production application. So we're seeing the enterprise have a much bigger say at the table. Much louder voice at the table to say, "We've been doing this enterprise all the time. We know how to really consolidate, bring hyper-converged applications, hyper-converged infrastructure, to really accelerate these kind of applications. Really accelerate the outcomes that are needed to really drive that smart factory." And start to bring that same capabilities down into the Mac on the factory floor. That way, if you do it once to make it easier to implement you can repeat that. You can scale that. You can manage it much easily. And you can then bring that all together because you have the security in one centralized location. So we're seeing manufacturers... Yeah, that first use case may be fairly difficult to implement and we got to go down in and see exactly what their problems are. But when the infrastructure is done the correct way, when that... Think about how you're going to run that and how are you going to optimize the engineering. Well, let's take that what you've done in that one factory and then set. Let's that, make that across all the factories including the factory that we're in, but across the globe. That makes it much, much easier. You really do the hard work once and then repeat almost like a cookie cutter. >> Got it, thank you. Aditi, what about the skillsets available to apply these to these projects? You got to have knowledge of digital, AI, data, integration. Is there a talent shortage to get all this stuff done? >> Yeah, I mean, definitely. Different types of skillsets are needed from a traditional manufacturing skillset, right. Of course, the basic knowledge of manufacturing is important. But the digital skillsets, like, you know, IoT. Having a skillset in different protocols for connecting the machines, right. That experience that comes with it. Data and analytics, security, augmented virtual reality, programming. You know, again, looking at robotics and the digital twin. So, you know, it's a lot more connectivity software data-driven skillsets that are needed to smart factory to life at scale. And, you know, lots of firms are, you know, recruiting these types of resources with these skillsets to, you know, accelerate their smart factory implementation as well as consulting firms like DXC technology and others. We recruit. We train our talent to provide these services. >> Got it. Aditi, I wonder if we could stay on you. Let's talk about the partnership between DXC and Dell. What are you doing specifically to simplify the move to industry 4.0 for customers? What solutions are you offering? How are you working together, Dell and DXC, to bring these to market? >> Yeah, I... Dell and DXC have a very strong partnership, you know, and we work very closely together to create solutions, to create strategies, and how we are going to jointly help our clients, right. So. Areas that we have worked closely together is edge compute, right. How that impacts the smart factory. So we have worked pretty closely in that area. We're also looked at vision technologies, you know. How do we use that at the edge to improve the quality of products, right. So we have several areas that we collaborate in and our approach is that we want to bring solutions to our client and as well as help them scale those solutions with the right infrastructure, the right talent, and the right level of security. So we bring a comprehensive solution to our clients. >> So, Todd, last question. Kind of similar but different. You know, why Dell DXC? Pitch me. What's different about this partnership? You know, where are you confident that, you know, you're going to deliver the best value to customers? >> Absolutely, great question. You know, there's no shortage of bespoke solutions that are out there. There's hundreds of people that can come in and do individual use cases and do these things and just... And that's where it ends. What Dell and DXC Technology together bring to the table is we do the optimization of the engineering of those previously bespoke solutions upfront, together. Right. The power of our scalables, enterprise grade, structured, you know, industry standard infrastructure as well as our expertise in delivering package solutions that really accelerate with DXC's expertise and reputation as a global trusted advisor. Be able to really scale and repeat those solutions that DXC is so really, really good at. And Dell's infrastructure and our, what, 30,000 people across the globe that are really, really good at that scalable infrastructure to be able to repeat. And then it really lessens the risk that our customers have and really accelerates those solutions. So it's, again, not just one individual solutions. It's all of the solutions that not just drive use cases but drive outcomes with those solutions. >> Yeah, you're right. The partnership has gone... I mean, I first encountered it back in, I think, it was 2010, May of 2010. We had you guys both on the queue... I think we were talking about converged infrastructure and I had a customer on, and it was actually manufacturing customer. Was quite interesting. And back then it was how do we kind of replicate what's coming in the cloud? And you guys have obviously taken it into the digital world. Really want to thank you for your time today. Great conversation. And love to have you back. >> Thank you so much. >> Absolutely. >> It was a pleasure speaking with you. >> I agree. >> All right, keep it right there for more discussions that educate and inspire on theCUBE.
SUMMARY :
Welcome back to the program. Great to be here. the manufacturing industry? and to be able to stay add to what Todd just said? the downtime, you know, the incumbents have to continue that they need to think about. So that's got to be a on the factory floor down to the edge. of the digital equivalent and have a lot to offer to be You got to have knowledge of that are needed to smart to simplify the move to How that impacts the smart factory. to deliver the best value It's all of the solutions And love to have you back. that educate and inspire on theCUBE.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
DXC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Aditi Banerjee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Todd Edmunds | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Aditi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Todd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
52% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DXC Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
May of 2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two use cases | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two edges | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one factory | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Hoover Dam | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
hundreds of people | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
today | DATE | 0.91+ |
three options | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
twin | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Smart Manufacturing, Edge and Digital Twins | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Mac | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.85+ |
Dell DXC | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
Vice President General Manager | PERSON | 0.84+ |
one individual solutions | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
Aditi | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
Aerospace Defense and Manufacturing | ORGANIZATION | 0.69+ |
Fortune | ORGANIZATION | 0.59+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.55+ |
4.0 | OTHER | 0.54+ |
Industry 4.0 | EVENT | 0.42+ |
4.0 | EVENT | 0.33+ |
500 | TITLE | 0.28+ |
Architecting SaaS Superclouds | Supercloud22
>>Welcome back to super cloud 22, our inaugural event. It's a pilot event here in the cube studios we're live and streaming virtually until we do it in person. Maybe next year. I'm John fury, host of the cube with Dave Lon two great guests, distinguished engineers managers, CTOs investors. Mariana Tessel is a CTO of Intuit ins Ray founder of vertex ventures. Both have a lot of DNA. Founder allow cloud here with mark Andre and Ben Horowitz, a variety of other great ventures you've done. And now you're an investor. Yep. Maria, you've been a seasoned CTO, VP of engineering, VMware Docker Intuit. Now thanks for joining us. >>Absolutely. >>So super cloud is a, is a thing. And apparently it's got a lot of momentum and you guys got stats over there at, at Intuit in, so you're investing and we were challenged on super cloud. Our initial thesis was you build on the clouds, get all that leverage like snowflake, you get a good differentiation and then you compete and then move to other clouds. Now it's becoming a thing where I can do this. Every enterprise could possibly do it. So I want to get your guys thoughts on what you think of super cloud concept and where are the holes in it, what needs to be defined. And so we'll start with you. You've done a lot of cloud things in your day. What >>Do you think? Yeah, it's the whole cloud journey started with a desire to consolidate and desire to actually provide uniformity and, and standards driven ways of doing things. And I think Amazon was a leader there. They helped kind of teach everybody else. You know, when I was in loud cloud, we were trying to do it with proprietary stacks just wouldn't work. But once everyone standardized upon Unix and you know, the chip sets no longer became as relevant. They did a lot of good things there, but what's happened since then is now you've got competing standards at the API layer at the interface layer no longer at the chip set layer, no longer at the operating system layer. Right? So the evolution of the, the, the battles are still there. When you talk about multicloud and super cloud, though, like one of the big things you have to keep in mind is latency is not free. Latency is very expensive and it's getting even more expensive now with, with multi-cloud. So you have to really understand where the separations of boundaries are between your data, your compute, and, and the network is just there as a facilitator to help binding compute and data. Right? And I think there's a lot of bets being made across different vendors like CloudFlare Akamai, as well as Amazon Google Microsoft in terms of how they think we should take computing either to the edge, from the core or back and forth. >>These, this is structural change. I mean, this is structural, >>It's desired by incumbents, but it's not something that I'm seeing from the consumption. I'd love to hear, hear from our end's per perspective, from a consumption point of view, like how much edge computing really matters. Right. >>Mario. >>So I think there's like, there's kind of a, a story of like two, like it's kind of, you can cut it for both edges. No, no pun intended on one end. It is really simplifying to actually go into like a single cloud and standardize on it and just have everything there. But I think what over time companies find is that they end up in multiple clouds, whether like, you know, through acquisitions or through like needing to use a service in another cloud. So you do find yourself in a situation where you have multi multi-cloud and you have to kind of work through it and understand how to make it all like work and latency is an issue, but also for many, many workloads, you can work around it and you can make it work where you have workloads that actually span multiple vendors and clouds. You know, again, having said that, I would say the world is such, that is still a simplifying assumption. When if you go to a single cloud, it's much easier to just go and, and bet on that >>Easier in terms of everything's integrated, IAS works with SAS, they solve a lot of problems. >>Correct. And you can do like for your developers, you can actually provide an environment that's super homogenous, simple. You can use services easily up and down the stack. And, you know, we, we actually made that deliberate decision. When we started migrating to the cloud at the beginning, it was like, oh, let's do like hybrid we'll, you know, make it, so it work anywhere. It was so complicated. It was not worth it. >>When was the, when did you give up, what was the moment? Was there a flash point where you said, oh, this is terrible. This is >>Dead. Yeah. When, when we started to try to make it interoperable and you just see what it requires to do that and the complexity of the architecture that it just became not worth it for the gains you have. >>So speaking obviously as a SAS provider, right. So it just doesn't, it didn't make business case sense for you guys to do that. So it was super cloud. Then an infrastructure thing we just heard from Ben wa deja VI that they're not, they're going beyond instantiating their, their data cloud. They're actually running, you know, their own little snow grid. They called it. And, and then when I asked him, well, what about latency? He said, well, we copied data over, you know, so, okay. That's you have to do, but that's a singular experience with the same governance or the same security. Just wasn't worth it for you guys is what I'm hearing. >>Correct. But again, like for some workload or for some services that we want to use, we are gonna go there and we are gonna then figure out what is the work around the latency issue, whether it's like copy or, you know, redundancy. >>Well, the question I have Dave on snowflake is maybe the question for you and in the panel is snowflake a tan expansion opportunity, or is there a technical reason to go to other clouds? >>I think they wanted to leverage the hyperscale infrastructure globally. And they said that they're out there, it's a free gift. We're gonna go take it. I, I think it started with we're on AWS. Do you think? And then we're on Azure and then we're on Google. And then they said, why don't we just connect all these and make it a singular experience? And yeah, I guess it's a TA expansion as a differentiator and it's, it adds value. Right. If I can share data across that global network, >>We have customers on Azure now, >>Right? Yeah. Yeah. Of course. >>You guys don't need to go CP. What do you think about that? >>Well, I think Snowflake's in a good position cuz they work mostly with analytical workloads and you have capacity. That's always gonna increase like no one subtracts, their analytical workload like ever, right. So there was just compounded growth is like 50% or 80% for, you know, many enterprises despite their best intentions, not to collect more data, they just can't stop doing it. So it's different than if you're like an Oracle or a transactional database where you don't have those, you know, like kind of infinite growth paths. So Snowflake's gonna continue to expand footprint their customers. They don't mind as long as you, they can figure out the, the lowest cost on denominator for, for that. >>Yeah. So it makes sense to be in all the clouds >>For them, for, for them, for sure. Yeah. >>But, but, but Oracle just announced with Microsoft what I would call super cloud, a, a cross cloud database service running on OCI and Azure with very low latency and a database that looks like a, the singular experience. Yeah. With, with a PAs layers >>That lost me after OCI that's >>Okay. You know, but that's the, that's the, the BS answer for all U VCs. The do nobody develops on Oracle? Well, it's a 240 billion market cap company. Show me who you all want be. >>We're gonna talk about SRDF and em C next, you >>All want Oracle. So there we go. You throw that into, you all want Oracle to buy your companies, your funding, you know, cause, cause we all wanna be like Oracle with that kinda cash flow. But, but anyway, >>Here's, here's one thing that I'm noticing that is gonna be really practical. I think for companies that do run SA is because like, you know, you have all these solutions, whether it's like analytics or like monitoring or logging or whatever. And each one of them is very data hungry and all of them have like SAS solutions that end up copy the data, moving data to their cloud, and then they might charge you by the size of your data. It does become kind of overwhelming for companies to use that many tools and basically maybe have that data kind of charge for it, multiple places because you use it for different purposes or just in general, if you have a lot of data, you know, that that is becoming an issue. So that's something that I've noticed in our, in our own kind of, you know, a world, but it's just something that I think companies need to think about how they solve because eventually a lot of companies will say, I cannot have all these solutions, so there's no way I'm gonna be willing to have so many copies of the data and actually pay for that. >>So many times, just something to think about. >>But one of the criticisms of the super cloud concept is that it's just SAS. If I'm running workload on prem and I, and I've got, you know, a connection to the cloud, which you probably do, that's, that's SAS, what's, what's the big deal and that's not anything new or different. So I'd love to get your thoughts on that. But Goldman Sachs, for instance, just announced the service last reinvent with AWS, connecting their tools, their data, and their software from on-prem to AWS, they're offering it as a service. I'm like, Hmm. Kind of looking like Supercloud, but maybe it's just SAS. >>It could be. And like, what I'm talking about is not so much like, you know, like what you wanna connect your data. But the idea is like a lot of the providers of different services, like in the past and, and like higher layer, they're actually COPI the data. They need the data in their cloud or their solution. And it just becomes complicated and expensive is, is kind of like my point. So yes, connecting it like for you to have the data in one place and then be able to connect to it. I think that is a valid, if, if that's kinda what you think about as a super cloud, that is a valid need, I think that companies will >>Have where developers actually want access to tools that might exist. >>Also the key is developers, right? Yeah. Developers decide all decisions, not database on administrators, not, you know, a hundred percent security engineers, not admins. So what's really interesting is where are the developers going next? If you look at the current winners in the current ecosystem, companies like MongoDB, I mean, they capture the minds of yeah. The JavaScript, you know, no JS developers absolutely very early on. And I started catch base and I could tell you like the difference was that capture motion was so important. So developers are basically used to this game-like experience now where they want to see tools that are free, whether it's open source or not, they actually don't care. They just want, and they want it SAS. They want it SAS delivered on demand. Right. And pay as you go. And so there's a lot of these different frameworks coming out next generation, no code, low code, whether it's Java, JavaScript, rust, you know, whatever, you know, go Lang. And there's a lot of people fighting religious wars about how to develop the next kind of modern pattern design pattern. Okay. And that's where a lot of excitement is how we look at like investment opportunities. Like where are those big bets who are, you know, frustrated developers, who are they frustrated, what's wrong with their current environment? You know, do they really enjoy using Kubernetes or trying to use Kubernetes? Yeah. Right. Like developers have a very different view than operator, >>But you mentioned couch base. I mean, I look at couch base what they're doing with Capellas as a form of Supercloud. I mean, I think that's an excellent, they're bringing that out to the edge. We're gonna hear later on from someone from couch base. That's gonna talk about that now. It's kind of a lightweight, you know, sort of, it's gonna be a, a synchronization, but it's the beginning >>A cool new venture deal that I'm not in, but was like duck DB. I'm like, what's duck DB like, well, it's an Emory database that has like this like remote store thing. I'm like, okay, that sounds interesting. Like let's call Mike Olson cuz that sounds like sleepy cat redone red distributed world. But like it's, it's like there's a lot of people refactoring design patterns that we're all grew up with since the popup days of, you know, typical round. Right? >>Yeah. That's the refactory I think that's the big pattern. So I have to ask you guys, what are you guys investing in? We've got a couple minutes left to chat about that. What are you investing at into it from a, from a, a CTO engineering perspective and what are you investing in that feels super cloud like to you? >>Well, the, the thing that like I'm focused on is to make sure that we have absolutely best in the world development environment for our engineers, where it's modern, it's easy to use and it incorporates as many things as we can into that environment. So the engineers don't have to think about it. Like one big example would be security and how we incorporated that into development environment. So again, the engineers don't have to bother with trying to think through how they secure their workloads and every step of the way their other things that we incorporated, whether it's like rollbacks or monitoring or, you know, like baly enough other things. But I think that's really an investment that has panned off for us. We actually started investing in development environment several years ago. We started measure our development velocity and we, it actually went up by six X justly investing. So >>User experience, developer experience and productivity pretty much right. >>Yeah. AB absolutely. Yeah. That's like a big investment area for us that, you know, cloud cloud >>Sounds like super cloudlike factor and I'm assuming it's you're on AWS. >>We are mostly on AWS. Yes. >>And so what are you investing in that from a VC money doling out standpoint? That feels super cloudlike >>So very similar to what we just touched on a lot of developer tool experiences. We have a company that we've invested in called ops level that the service catalogs it's, it's helping, you know, understand your, where your services live and how they could be accessed and, and you know, enterprise kind of that come with that. And then we have a company called Lugo that helps you do serverless debugging container debugging, cuz it turns out debugging distributed, you know, applications is a real problem right now just you can only do so much by log tracing, right? We have a company haven't announced yet that's in the web assembly space. So we're looking at modernizing the next generation past stack and throwing everything out the window, including Java and all of the, you know, current prebuilt components because turns out 90% of enterprise workloads are actually not used. They're they're just policy code. You compiled with they're sitting there as vulnerabilities that no one's actually accessing, but you still have to compile with all of it. So we have a lot of bloatware happening in the enterprise. So we're thinking about how do you skinny that up with the next generation paths that's enterprise capable with security context and frameworks >>Super pass. >>Well, yeah, super pass. That's a kind of good way to, well, is >>It, is it a consistent developer experience across clouds? >>It is. And, and, and, and web assembly is a very raw standard if you can call it that. I mean it's, but it's supported by every modern browser, every major platform, vendor cloud, and Adobe and others, and are using it for their uses. And it's not just about your edge browser compute. It's really, you can take the same framework and compile it down to server side as well as client site, just like JavaScript was a client side tool before it became node. Right. Right. So we're looking at that as a very interesting opportunity. It's very nascent. Yeah. >>Great patterns. Yeah. Well, thanks so much for spending the time outta your busy day. Ariana. Thanks for your commentary. Appreciate your coming on the cubes first in IGUR super cloud event, pilot. Thanks for, for sharing. Thanks for having, thanks for having us. Okay. More coverage here. Super cloud 2022. I'm Jeff David Alane stay with us. We got our cloud ARA panel coming up next.
SUMMARY :
I'm John fury, host of the cube with Dave Lon two great guests, distinguished engineers managers, lot of momentum and you guys got stats over there at, at Intuit in, So you have to really understand where the separations of boundaries are between your data, I mean, this is structural, It's desired by incumbents, but it's not something that I'm seeing from the consumption. whether like, you know, through acquisitions or through like needing to use a service And you can do like for your developers, you can actually provide an environment When was the, when did you give up, what was the moment? just became not worth it for the gains you have. They're actually running, you know, their own little snow grid. issue, whether it's like copy or, you know, redundancy. Do you think? Right? What do you think about that? So there was just compounded growth is like 50% or 80% for, you know, many enterprises despite Yeah. that looks like a, the singular experience. Show me who you all want be. You throw that into, you all want Oracle to buy your companies, moving data to their cloud, and then they might charge you by the size of your data. and I, and I've got, you know, a connection to the cloud, which you probably do, that's, And like, what I'm talking about is not so much like, you know, like what you wanna connect your data. And I started catch base and I could tell you like the difference was It's kind of a lightweight, you know, sort of, patterns that we're all grew up with since the popup days of, you know, typical round. So I have to ask you guys, what are you guys investing in? So again, the engineers don't have to bother with trying to think through how you know, cloud cloud We are mostly on AWS. And then we have a company called Lugo that helps you do serverless debugging container debugging, That's a kind of good way to, well, is It's really, you can take the same framework and compile it down to server side as well as client Thanks for your commentary.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Lon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Maria | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ben Horowitz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mariana Tessel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Goldman Sachs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ariana | PERSON | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mike Olson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff David Alane | PERSON | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
240 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Java | TITLE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
JavaScript | TITLE | 0.99+ |
John fury | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lugo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intuit ins | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
mark Andre | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both edges | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Adobe | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.97+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Mario | PERSON | 0.97+ |
single cloud | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
two great guests | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
VMware Docker Intuit | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
each one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Unix | TITLE | 0.95+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one end | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
SRDF | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
six X | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
several years ago | DATE | 0.93+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Superclouds | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Ben wa deja VI | PERSON | 0.92+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
IAS | TITLE | 0.88+ |
MongoDB | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
Supercloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
super cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
Supercloud22 | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Intuit in | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
node | TITLE | 0.84+ |
Capellas | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
ARA | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
OCI | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.81+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
IGUR super cloud | EVENT | 0.8+ |
super cloud 22 | EVENT | 0.78+ |
one big | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
JS | TITLE | 0.76+ |
Emory | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
CloudFlare | TITLE | 0.64+ |
Super cloud 2022 | EVENT | 0.59+ |
Akamai | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
SAS | TITLE | 0.47+ |
Ray | PERSON | 0.38+ |
Steve McDowell, Moor Insights & Strategy | At Your Storage Service
(upbeat music) >> We're back with Steve McDowell, the Principal Analyst for Data & Storage at Moor Insights and Strategy. Hey Steve, great to have you on. Tell us a little bit about yourself. You've got a really interesting background and kind of a blend of engineering and strategy and what's your research focus? >> Yeah, so my research, my focus area is data and storage and all the things around that, whether it's On-Prem or Cloud or, you know, software as a service. My background, as you said, is a blend, right? I grew up as an engineer. I started off as an OS developer at IBM. I came up through the ranks and shifted over into corporate strategy and product marketing and product management, and I have been doing working as an industry analyst now for about five years at Moor Insights and Strategy. >> Steve, how do you see this playing out in the next three to five years? I mean, cloud got it all started, it's going to snowballing. You know, however you look at it percent of spending on storage that you think is going to land in as a service. How do you see the evolution here? >> IT buyers are looking at as a service and consumption base is, you know, a natural model. It extends the data center, brings all of the flexibility all of the goodness that I get from public cloud, but without all of the downside and uncertainty on cost and security and things like that, right, that also come with the public cloud and it's delivered by technology providers that I trust and that I know, and that I worked with, you know, for, in some cases, decades. So, I don't know that we have hard data on how much adoption there is of the model, but we do know that it's trending up, you know and every infrastructure provider at this point has some flavor of offering in the space. So, it's clearly popular with CIOs and IT practitioners alike. >> So Steve, organizations are at a they're different levels of maturity in their, their transformation journeys, and of course, as a result, they're going to have different storage needs that are aligned with their bottom line business objectives. From an IT buyer perspective, you may have data on this, even if it's anecdotal, where does storage as a service actually fit in and can it be a growth lever? >> It can absolutely be a growth leader. It gives me the flexibility as an IT architect to scale my business over time without worrying about how much money I have to invest in storage hardware. Right? So I, I get kind of, again, that cloud like flexibility in terms of procurement and deployment, but it gives me that control by oftentimes being on site within my premise, and then I manage it like a storage array that I own. So, you know, it's beautiful for for organizations that are scaling and it's equally nice for organizations that just want to manage and control cost over time. So, it's a model that makes a lot of sense and fits and certainly growing in adoption and in popularity. >> How about from a technology vendor perspective? You've worked for in the tech industry for companies? What do you think is going to define the winners and losers in this space? If you running strategy for a storage company, what would you say? >> I think the days of of a storage administrator managing, you know, rate levels and recovering and things of that sort are over, right? What these organizations like Pure delivering but they're offering is simplicity. It's a push button approach to deploying storage to the applications and workloads that need it, right? It becomes storage as a utility. So, it's not just the, you know the consumption based economic model of as a service. It's also the manageability that comes with that or the flexibility of management that comes with that. I can push a button, deploy bites to you know a workload that needs it, and it just becomes very simple, right, for the storage administrator, in a way that, you know kind of old school On-Prem storage can't really deliver. >> You know, I want to, I want to ask you, I mean I've been thinking about this because again, a lot of companies are, are you know, moving, hopping on the as a service bandwagon. I feel like, okay, in and of itself, that's not where the innovation lives. The innovation is going to come from making that singular experience from On-Prem to the clouds across clouds maybe eventually out to the edge. Do you, where do you see the innovation in as a service? >> Well, there's two levels of innovation, right? One, is business model innovation, right? I now have an organizational flexibility to build the infrastructure to support my digital transformation efforts, but on the product side and the offering side, it really is as you said, it's about the integration of experience. Every enterprise today touches a cloud in some way, shape or form. Right, I have data spread, not just in my data center, but at the edge, oftentimes in a public cloud, maybe a private cloud. I don't know where my data is, and it really lands on the storage providers to help me manage that and deliver that manageability experience to to the IT administrators. So, when I look at innovation in this space, you know, it's not just a a storage array and rack that I'm leasing, right, this is not another lease model. It's really fully integrated, you know end to end management of my data and yeah and all of the things around that. >> Yeah, so to your point about a lease model is if you're doing a lease, you know, yeah. You can shift CapEx to OPEX, but you're still committed to you have to over provision, whereas here and I wanted to ask you about that. It's an interesting model, right, because you got to read the fine print. Of course the fine print says you got to commit to some level typically, and then if, you know, if you go over you you charge for what you use and you can scale that back down and that's got to be very attractive for folks. I wonder if you we'll ever see like true cloud like consumption pricing, that has two edges to it, right? You see consumption based pricing in some of the software models and you know yeah, people like it, the, the lines of business maybe because they're paying in by the drink, but then procurement hates it because they don't have predictability. How do you see the pricing models? Do you see that maturing or do you think we're sort of locked in on, on where we're at? >> No, I do see that maturing, right? And when you work with a company like Pure to understand their consumption base and as a service and you know, when you work with a company like Pure to understand their consumption base and as a service offerings, it really is sitting down and understanding where your data needs are going to scale. Right? You buy in at a certain level, you have capacity planning. You can expand if you need to. You can shrink if you need to. So, it really does put more control in the hands of the IT buyer than, well certainly then traditional CapEx based On-Prem, but also more control than you would get, you know working with an Amazon or an Azure. >> Well the next 10 years, it ain't going to be like the last 10 years. Thanks Steve! We'll leave it there for now. Love to have you back. Look at, keep it right there. You don't want to miss this next segment where we dig into the customer angle. You're watching theCube production of At Your Storage Service, brought to you by PureStorage. One more. Okay, thanks Steve! We'll leave it there for now. I'd love to have you back. Keep it right there, At Your Storage Service continues in a moment. You're watching theCube. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Hey Steve, great to have you on. or, you know, software as a service. on storage that you think is you know, a natural model. you may have data on this, So, you know, it's beautiful deploy bites to you know are you know, moving, hopping it really is as you said, to you have to over and as a service and you know, Love to have you back.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve McDowell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pure | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Moor Insights and Strategy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
OPEX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two levels | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two edges | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
PureStorage | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about five years | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.93+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
next 10 years | DATE | 0.83+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Moor Insights | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
last 10 years | DATE | 0.79+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.78+ |
At Your Storage Service | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
Strategy | ORGANIZATION | 0.74+ |
One more | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
theCube | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
Pure Storage At Your Storage Service Full Show V1
>>When AWS introduced the modern cloud in 2006, many people didn't realize the impact that it would have on the industry, but some did see the future of an as a service economy coming. I mean, SAS offerings came out several years before. And the idea of applying some of these concepts to infrastructure and simplifying deployment and management, you know, kinda looked enticing to a lot of customers and a subscription model, or, but yet a consumption model was seen as a valuable proposition by many customers. Why not apply it to infrastructure? And why should the hyperscalers have all the fun welcome to at your storage service? My name is Dave ante. And as an analyst at the time, I was excited about the, as a service trend early on. And one of the companies that caught my attention back in the beginning of last decade was pure storage. >>Pure not only was delivering cloud- simplicity, but it's no forklift approach to infrastructure was ahead of its time. And that's why we're here today to dig into what's happening with the, as a service trends that we see popping up all over the world today, we're gonna dig into three sessions with noted experts in the field. First pre Darie is the general manager of the digital experience business unit at pure storage. He's gonna join us. And then we bring in Steve McDowell, Steve's a senior analyst for data and storage at more insights and strategy, a well known consultancy and analyst firm. And finally, we close with Amil sta Emil is the chief commercial officer and chief marketing officer at open line, open lines, a managed service provider. They serve the mid-market and Emil's got a very wide observation space. He's gonna share what he's seeing with customers. So sit back and enjoy the show. >>The cloud has popularized many useful concepts in the past decade, working backwards from the customer two pizza teams, a DevOps mindset, the shared responsibility model in security. And of course the shift from CapEx to OPEX and as a service consumption models. The last item is what we're here to talk about today. Pay for consumption is attractive because you're not over provisioning. At least not the way you used to you'd have to buy for peak capacity events, but there are always two sides to every story and well pay for use more closely ties. It consumption to business value procurement teams. Don't always love the uncertainty of the cloud bill each month, but consumption pricing. And as a service models are here to stay in software and hardware. Hello, I'm Dave ante and welcome to at your storage service made possible by pure storage. And with me is Pash DJI. Who's the general manager of the digital experience business unit at pure Pash. Welcome to the program. >>Thanks Dave. Thanks for having me. >>You bet. Okay. We've seen this shift to, as a service, the, as a service economy, subscription models, and this as a service movement have gained real momentum. It's it's clear over the past several years, what's driving this shift. Is it pressure from investors and technology companies that are chasing the all important ARR, their annual recurring revenue stream? Is it customer driven? Give us your insights. >>Well, look, um, I think we'll do some definitional stuff first. I think we often mix the definition of a subscription and a service, but, you know, subscription is, Hey, I can go for pay up front or pay as I go. Service is more about how do I not buy something just by the outcome. So, you know, the concept of delivering storage as a service means, what do you want in storage performance, capacity availability? Like that's what you want. Well, how do you get that without having to worry about the labor of planning capacity management, those labor elements are what's driving it. So I think in the world where you have to do more with less and in a world where security becomes increasingly important, where standardization will allow you to secure your landscape against ransomware and those types of things, those trends are driving the ation of storage and the only way to deliver that is storage as a service. >>So that's, that's good. You maybe thinking about it differently than some of the other companies that I talked to, but so you, you, you've made inroads here pretty big inroads actually, and changed the thinking in enterprise data storage with a huge emphasis on simplicity. That's really pures rayon Detra. How does storage as a service fit into your innovation agenda overall? >>Well, our innovation agenda started, as you mentioned with the simplicity, you know, a decade ago with the evergreen architecture, that architecture was beyond the box. How do you go ahead and say, I can improve performance or capacity as I need it? Well, that's a foundational element to deliver a service because once you have that technology, you can say, oh, you know what? You've subscribed to this performance level. You want to raise your performance level and yes, that'll be a higher dollar per gig or dollar per terabyte. But how do you do that without a data migration? How do you do that with a non disruptive service change? How do you do that with a delivery via a software update, those elements of non disruptive updates. When you think SAS, Salesforce, you don't know when Salesforce doesn't update, you don't know when they're increasing something, adding a new capability just shows up. It's not a disruptive event. So to drive that standardization and sation and service delivery, you need to keep that simplicity of delivery first and foremost, and you can't allow, like, if the goal was, I want to change from this service tier to that service tier and a person needed to show up and do a day data migration, that's kind of useless. You've broken the experience of flexibility for a customer. >>Okay. So I like the Salesforce analogy, but I wanna jump out, do a little side for a second. So I I've gotta, I've gotta make some commitment to pure, right. Some baseline commitment. And if I do, then I can dial up and pay for what I use and I can dial it down. Correct? Correct. Okay. I can't do that with Salesforce. <laugh> right. I could dial up, but then I'm stuck with those licenses. So you have a better model in Salesforce. I would argue. Okay. Yeah, >>I would, I would agree with that. >>Okay. So, and I gotta pay for everything up front anyway. Um, let's go back. I was kind of pushing at you a little bit at my upfront, you know, about, you know, the ARR model, the, the all important, you know, financial metric, but let's talk from the customers standpoint. What are the benefits of consuming storage as a service from your customer's perspective? >>Well, one is when you start your storage journey, do you really know what you need? And I would argue most of the time people are guessing, right? It's like, well, I think I need this. This is the performance I think I need. Or this is the capacity I think I need. And, you know, with the scientific method, you actually deploy something and you're like, do I need more? Do I need less? You find out as you're deploying. So in a storage as a service world, when you have the ability to move up performance levels or move out capacity levels, and you have that flexibility, then you have the ability to just to meet demand as you deploy. And that's the most important element of meeting business needs today. The applications you deploy are not in your control when you're providing storage to your end consumers. >>Yeah. They're gonna want different levels of storage. They're gonna want different performance thresholds. That's kind of a pay, you know, pay for performance type culture, right? You can use HR analogies for it. You pay for performance. You want top talent, you pay for it. You want top storage performance, you pay for it. Um, you don't, you can pay less and you can actually get lower performance, tiers, not everything is a tier one application. And you need the ability to deploy it. But when you start, how do you know the way your end customers are gonna be consuming? Or do you need a dictated upfront? Cause that's infrastructure dictating business inflexibility, and you never want to be in that position. >>I, I got another analogy for you. It's like, you know, we do a lot of hosting at our home and you know, like Thanksgiving, right? And you go to the liquor store and say, okay, what should I get? Should we get red wine? We gotta go white wine. We gotta get some beer. Should I get bubbles? Yeah, I get some bubbles. Cause you don't know what people are gonna have. And so you over provision everything <laugh> and then there's a run on bubbles and you're like, ah, we run outta bubbles. So you just over buy, but there's a liquor store that actually will take it back. So I gotta do business with those guys every time. Cuz it's way more flexible. I can dial up capacity or can dial up performance and dial it back down if I don't use it >>Or you or you're gonna be drinking a lot more the next few weeks. >>Yeah, exactly. Which is the last thing you want. Okay. So let's talk about how pure kind of meets this as a service demand. You've touched upon your, your differentiators from others in the market. Um, you know, love to hear about the momentum. What, what are you seeing out there? >>Yeah. Look, our business is growing well, largely built on, you know, what customers need. Um, specifically where the market is at today is there's a set of folks that are interested in the financial transformation of CapEx to OPEX, where like that definitely exists in the industry around how do I get a pay use model? The next kind of more advanced customer is interested in how do I go ahead and remove labor to deliver storage? And a service gets you there on top of a subscription. The most sophisticated customer says, how do I separate storage production with consumption and production of storage. Being a storage producer should be about standardization. So I could do policy based management. Why is that important? You know, coming back to some of the things I said earlier in the world where ransomware attacks are common, you need the standardized security policies. >>Linux has new vulnerabilities every, every other day, like find 2, 2, 3 critical vulnerabilities a week. How do you stay on top of it? The complexity of staying on top of it should be, look, let's standardize and make it a vendor problem. And assume the vendor's gonna deliver this to me. So that standardization allows you to have business policies that allow you to stay current and modern. I would argue in, you know, the traditional storage and appliance world, you buy something and the day a, the day after you buy it, it's worthless. It's like driving a car off a lot, right? The very next day, the car's not worth what it was when you bought it. Storage is the same way. So how do you ensure that your storage stays current? How do you ensure that it gets like a fine line that gets better, better with age? Well, if you're not buying storage and you're buying a performance SLA, it's up to the vendor to meet that SLA. So it actually never gets worse over time. This is the way you modernize technology and avoid technology debt as a customer. >>Yeah. I mean, just even though words you're using in the way you're thinking about this precaution, I think are, are, are different. Uh, and I love the concept of essentially taking my labor cost and transferring them to pures R and D I mean, that's essentially what you're talking about here. Um, so let's, let's, let's stick with the, the, the tech for a minute. What do you see as new or emerging technologies that are helping accelerate this shift toward the, as a service economy? >>Well, the first thing is I always tell people, you can't deliver a service without monitoring, because if you can't monitor something, how you're gonna know what your, whether you're meeting your service level obligation, right? So everything starts with data monitoring. The next step layering on the technology. Differentiation is if you need to deliver a service level, OB obligation on top of that data monitoring, you need the ability to flexibly, meet whatever performance obligations you have in a tight time window. So supply chain and being able to deliver anywhere becomes important. So if you use the analogy today of how Tesla works or a IOT system works, you have a SaaS management that actually provides instructions that push pushes those instructions and policies to the edge. In Tesla's case, that happens to be the car it'll push software updates to the car. It'll push new map updates to the car, but the car is running independently. >>It's not like if the car becomes disconnected from the internet, it's gonna crash and drive you off the road in the same way. What if you think about storage as something that needs to be wherever your application is? So people think about cloud as a destination. I think that's a fallacy. You have to think about the world in the world in the view of an application, an application needs data, and that data needs to sit in storage wherever that application sits. So for us, the storage system is just an edge device. It can be sitting in your data center, it can be sitting in a Equinix. It can be sitting in hosted, an MSP can run. It can, can even be sitting in the public cloud, but how do you have central monitoring and central management where you can push policies to update all those devices? >>Very similar to an I IOT system. So the technology advantage of doing that means that you can operate anywhere and ensure you have a consistent set of policies, a consistent set of protection, a consistent set of, you know, prevention against ransomware attack, regardless of your application, regardless of, uh, you know, where it sits, regardless of what content in you're on that approach is very similar to the way the T industry has been updating and monitoring edge devices, nest, thermostats, you know, Tesla cars, those types of things. That's the thinking that needs to come to. And that's the foundation on which we built PI as a service. >>So that implies, or at least I infer that you've obviously got control of the experience on Preem, but you're extending that, uh, into AWS, Google Azure, which suggests to me that you have to hide the underlying complexity of the primitives and APIs in that world. And then eventually, actually today, cuz you're treating everything like the edge out to the edge, you know, maybe, maybe mini pure at some point in time. But so I call that super cloud that abstraction layer that floats above all the clouds on-prem and adds that layer of value. And is this singular experience? What you're talking about pushing, you know, policy throughout, is that the right way to think about it and how does this impact the ability to deliver true storage as a service? >>Oh, uh, that's absolutely the right way of thinking about it. The things that you think about from a, an abstraction kind of fall in three buckets, first, you need management. So how do you ensure a consistent management experience creating volumes, deleting volumes, creating buckets, creating files, creating directories, like management of objects and create a consistent API across the entire landscape. The second one is monitoring, how do you measure utilization and performance obligations or capacity obligations or uh, you know, policy violations, wherever you're at. And then the third one is more of a business one, which is procurement because you can't do it independent of procurement. Meaning what happens when you run out, you need to increase your reserve commits. Do you want to go on demand? How do you integrate it into company's procurement models, such that you can say, I can use what I need and any, it's not like every change order is a request of procurement. That's gonna break an as a service delivery model. So to get embedded in a customer's landscape where they don't have to worry about storage, you have to provide that consistency on management, monitoring and procurement across the tech. And yes, this is deep technology problems, whether it's running our storage on AWS or Azure or running it on prem or, you know, at some point in the future, maybe even, um, you know, pure mini at the edge. Right. <laugh> so, you know, tho all of those things are tied to our pure, a service delivery. >>Yeah, technically non-trivial but uh, Hey, you guys are on it. Well, we gotta leave it there. Pash. Thank you. Great stuff. Really appreciate your time. >>All right. Thanks for having me, man. >>You're very welcome. Okay. In a moment, Steve McDowell from more insights and strategies, it's gonna give us the analyst perspective on, as a service, you're watching the cube, the leader in high tech enterprise coverage. >>Why are customers making the change to pure as a service >>Other vendors, offering flexible consumption models will promise you the world on the surface. It's just what you need. But then you notice the asterisk that dreaded fine print. That turns just what you need into long-term commitments, disruptive upgrades and unpredictable costs, pure storage, launched pure as a service to provide the flexibility to respond to your ever changing needs. With clear per unit costs, no large upfront purchases and no asterisks. A usage based model should be simple, innovative, and adapt with the changing market. Unlike other vendors, pure is offering exactly that with options, for service tiers and short term contracts in a single unified subscription that allows you to improve your discounts over time. Pure makes sure you can grow and upgrade without ever taking your environment offline and without the constant worry of hidden costs with complete billing, transparency, unlike any other, you only pay for what you use and pure one helps track and predict demand from day to day, making sure you never outgrow your storage. So why are customers making the change to pure as a service convenient solutions with unlimited potential without the dreaded fine print? It's as simple as that, >>We're back with Steve McDowell, the principal analyst for data and storage at more insights and strategy. Hey Steve, great to have you on, tell us a little bit about yourself. You got a really interesting background and kind of a blend of engineering and strategy and what's your research focus? >>Yeah, so my research, my focus area is data and storage and all the things around that, right? Whether it's OnPrim or cloud or, or, or, you know, software as a service. Uh, my background, as you said, is a blend, right? I grew up as an engineer. I started off as an OS developer at IBM. Uh, came up through the ranks and, and shifted over into corporate strategy and product marketing and product management. Uh, and I've been doing, uh, working as an industry analyst now for about five years, more insights and strategy. >>Steve, how do you see this playing out in the next three to five years? I mean, cloud got it all started. It's gonna snowballing, you know, however you look at it, percent of spending on storage that you think is gonna land in as a service. How, how do you see the evolution here? >>I think it buyers are looking at as a service, a consumption based is, is, uh, uh, you know, a natural model. It extends the data center, brings all of the flexibility, all of the goodness that I get from public cloud, but without all of the downside and uncertainty around cost and security and things like that, right. That also come with a public cloud and it's delivered by technology providers that I trust and that I know, and that I've worked with, you know, for, in some cases, decades. So I don't know that we have hard data on how much, uh, adoption there is of the model, but we do know that it's trending up, uh, you know, and every infrastructure provider at this point has some flavor of offering in the space. So it's, it's clearly popular with CIOs and, and it practitioners alike. >>So Steve organizations are at a they're different levels of maturity in their, their transformation journeys. And of course, as a result, they're gonna have different storage needs that are aligned with their bottom line business objectives. From an it buyer perspective, you may have data on this, even if it's anecdotal, where does storage as a service actually fit in and can it be a growth lever >>Can absolutely be, uh, a growth leader. Uh, it, it gives me the flexibility as, as an it architect to scale my business over time, without worrying about how much money I have to invest in, in storage hardware. Right? So I, I get kind of, again, that cloudlike flexibility in terms of procurement and deployment. Uh, but it gives me that control by oftentimes being on site within my permit. And I manage it like a storage array that I own. Uh, so you know, it, it's, it's beautiful for, for organizations that are scaling and, and it's equally nice for organizations that just wanna manage and control cost over time. Um, so it's, it's a model that makes a lot of sense and fits and, and certainly growing in adoption and popularity. >>How about from a technology vendor perspective you've worked for in the, in the tech industry mm-hmm <affirmative> for, for companies? What do you think is gonna define the winners and losers in this space? If you were running strategy for, uh, storage company, what would you say? >>I, I think the days of, of a storage administrator managing, you know, rate levels and recovering and things of that sort are over, right, what would, what these organizations like pure delivering, but they're offerings is, is simplicity. It's a push button approach to deploying storage to the applications and workloads that need it, right. It becomes storage as a utility. So it's not just the, you know, the consumption based economic model of, of, uh, as a service. Uh, it, it's also the manageability that comes with that, or the flexibility of management that comes with that. I can push a button, deploy bites to, to, uh, you know, a workload that needs it. Um, and it just becomes very simple, right. For the storage administrator in a way that, you know, kind of old school OnPrim storage can't really deliver. >>You know, I wanna, I wanna ask you, I mean, I've been thinking about this because again, a lot of companies are, are, you know, moving, hopping on the, as a service bandwagon, I feel like, okay, in and of itself, that's not where the innovation lives, the innovation is gonna come from making that singular experience from on-prem to the clouds across clouds, maybe eventually out to the edge. Um, do you, do you, where do you see the innovation in as a service? >>Well, there there's two levels of innovation, right? One, one is business model innovation, right? I, I now have an organizational flexibility to build the infrastructure, to support my digital transformation efforts. Um, but on the product side and the offering side, it really is, as you said, it's about the integration of experience. Every enterprise today touches a cloud in some way, shape or form, right. I have data spread, not just in my data center, but at the edge, uh, oftentimes in a public cloud, maybe a private cloud, I don't know where my data is and it really lands on the storage providers to help me manage that and deliver that, uh, uh, manageability experience, uh, to, to the it administrators. So when I look at innovation in this space, you know, it's not just a storage array and rack that I'm leasing, right? This is not another lease model. It's really fully integrated, you know, end to end management of my data and, and, you know, and all of the things around that. >>Yeah. So you, to your point about a lease model is if you're doing a lease, you know, yeah. You can shift CapEx to OPEX, but you're still committed to, to, you have to over provision, whereas here, and I wanted to ask you about that. It's, it's, it's, it's an interesting model, right? Cuz you gotta read the fine print. Of course the fine print says you gotta commit to some level typically. And then if, you know, if you go over you, you charge for what you use and you can scale that back down and that's, that's gotta be very attractive for folks. I, I wonder if you will ever see like true cloud-like consumption pricing, that is two edges to it. Right. You see consumption based pricing in some of the software models and you know yeah. People like it, the lines of business maybe cuz they pay in by the drink, but then procurement hates it cuz they don't have predictability. How do you see the pricing models? Do you see that maturing or do you think we're sort of locked in on, on where we're at? >>No, I, I do. I do see that maturing. Right? And, and when you work with a company like pure to understand their consumption based and as a service offerings, uh, it, it really is sitting down and understanding where your data needs are going to scale, right? You, you buy in at a certain level, uh, you have capacity planning. You can expand if you need to, you can shrink if you need to. So it really does put more control in the hands of the it buyer than uh, well certainly then traditional CapEx based on-prem but also more control than you would get, you know, working with an Amazon or an Azure. >>Okay. Thanks Steve. We'll leave it there for now. I'd love to have you back. Keep it right there at your storage service continues in a moment. >>Some things are meant to last your storage should be one of them say hello to the evergreen storage program, say goodbye to refreshes and rebates. Forget planned downtime, performance impact and data migrations. Forget forklift upgrades. Evergreen storage starts with your agile storage architecture and covers the entire life cycle of the array from first purchase to ongoing use. And whenever it's time to modernize and grow, your satisfaction is covered with an evergreen subscription. You can get a full refund within 30 days for any reason, >>Our right size guarantee lets you buy just the storage you need never too much. Never not enough. Your array software is all inclusive. Even future releases and features maintenance and support costs remain constant throughout the life of your array. Proactive expert support is a true white glove experience. Evergreen maintenance ensures availability of any replacement components. Meet the demands of your business and protect your investment. Evergreen gold includes controller upgrades every three years. And if something unplanned comes up, evergreen gold provides upgrade flex the leading anytime upgrade feature to upgrade controllers whenever you need it. As you expand evergreen gold provides credits to consolidate storage with denser more modern flash. Evergreen is your subscription to continuous innovation for storage that lasts 10 years or more. Some things are meant to last make your storage. One of them >>We're back at your storage service. Emil Stan is here. He's the chief commercial officer and chief marketing officer of open line. Thank you Emil for coming on the cube. Appreciate your time. >>Thank you, David. Nice. Uh, glad to be here. >>Yes. Yeah. So tell us about open line. You're a managed service provider. What's your focus? >>Yeah, we're actually a cloud managed service provider and I do put cloud in front of the managed services because it's not just only the spheres that we manage. We have to manage the clouds as well nowadays. And then unfortunately, everybody only thinks there's one cloud, but it's always multiple layers in the cloud. So we have a lot of work in integrating it. We're a cloud manages provider in the Netherlands, focusing on, uh, companies who have head office in the Netherlands, mainly in the, uh, healthcare local government, social housing logistics department. And then in the midst size companies between say 250 to 10,000 office employees. Uh, and that's what we do. We provide 'em with excellent cloud managed services, uh, as it should be >>Interesting, you know, a lot early on in the cloud days, highly regulated industries like healthcare government were somewhat afraid of the cloud. So I'm sure that's one of the ways in which you provide value to your customers is helping them become cloud proficient. Maybe you could talk a little bit more about the value prop to customers. Why do they do business with you? >>And I think, uh, there are a number of reasons why they do business with us or choose to choose for our manage services provider that first of course are looking for stability and continuity. Uh, and, and from a cost perspective, predict predictable costs. But nowadays you also have a shortage in personnel and knowledge. So, and it's not always very easy for them to access, uh, those skill sets because most it, people just want to have, uh, a great variety in work, what they are doing, uh, towards, towards the local government, uh, healthcare, social housing. They actually, uh, a sector that, uh, that are really in between embracing the public cloud, but also have a lot of legacy and, and bringing together best of all, worlds is what we do. So we also bring them comfort. We do understand what legacy, uh, needs from a manager's perspective. We also know how to leverage the benefits in the public cloud. Uh, and, uh, I'd say from a marketing perspective, actually we focus on using an ideal cloud, being a mix of traditional and future based cloud. >>Thank you. I, you know, I'd like to get your perspective on this idea of as a service and the, as a service economy that we often talk about on the cube. I mean, you work with a lot of different companies. We talked about some of the industries and, and increasingly it seems like organizations are focused more on outcomes, continuous value delivery via, you know, suites of services and, and they're leaning into platforms versus one off product offerings, you know, do you see that? How do you see your customers reacting to this as a service trend? >>Yeah. Uh, to be honest, sometimes it makes it more complex because services like, look at your Android or iPhone, you can buy apps, uh, and download apps the way you want to. So they have a lot of apps about how do you integrate it into one excellent workflow, something that works for you, David or works for me. Uh, so the difficulty, some sometimes lies in, uh, the easy accessibility that you have to those solutions, but nobody takes into account that they're all part of a chain, a workflow supply chain, uh, and, and, uh, they're being hyped as well. So what we also have a lot of time in, in, in, in managing our customers is that the tremendous feature push feature push that there is from technology providers, SaaS providers. Whereas if you provide 10 features, you only need one or two, uh, but the other eight are very distracting from your prime core business. Uh, so there's a natural way in that people are embracing, uh, SA solutions, embracing cloud solutions. Uh, but what's not taken into account as much is that we love to see it is the way that you integrate all those solutions toward something that's workable for the person that's actually using them. And it's seldomly that somebody is only using one solution. There's always a chain of solutions. Um, so yeah, there are a lot of opportunities, but also a lot of challenges for us, but also for our customers, >>You see that trend toward, as a service continuing, or do you actually see based on what you're just saying that pendulum, you know, swinging back and forth, somebody comes out with a new sort of feature product and that, you know, changes the dynamic or do you see as a service really having legs? >>Ah, I, I think that's very, very good question, David, because that's something that's keeping our busy all the time. We do see a trend in a service looking at, uh, talk about pure later on. We also use pure as a service more or less. Yeah. And that really helps us. Uh, but you see, uh, um, that sometimes people make a step too, too fast, too quick, not well thought of, and then you see what they call sort of cloud repatriation, tend that people go back to what they're doing and then they stop innovating or stop leveraging. The possibilities are actually there. Uh, so from our consultancy, our guidance and architecture point of view, we try to help them as much as possible to think in a SA thought, but just don't use the, cloud's just another data center. Uh, and so it's all about managing the maturity on our side, but on our customer side as well. >>So I'm interested in how your sort of your philosophy and, and as relates, I think in, in, in terms of how you work with pure, but how do you stay tightly in lockstep with your customers so that you don't over rotate so that you don't and send them to over rotate, but then you're not also, you don't wanna be too late to the game. How, how do you manage all that? >>Oh, there's, there's, there's a world of interactions between us and our customers. And so I think a well known, uh, uh, thing that people is customer intimacy. That's very important for us to get to know our customers and get to predict which way they're moving. But the, the thing that we add to it is also the ecosystem intimacy. So no, the application and services landscape, our customers know the primary providers and work with them, uh, to, to, to create something that, that really fits the customers. They just not looked at from our own silo where a cloud managed service provider that we actually work in the ecosystem with, with, with, with the primary providers. And we have, I think with the average customers, I think we have, uh, uh, in a month we have so much interactions on our operational level and technical levels, strategic level. >>We do bring together our customers also, and to jointly think about what we can do together, what we independently can never reach. Uh, but we also involve our customers in, uh, defining our own strategy. So we have something we call a customer involvement board. So we present a strategy and say, does it make sense? Eh, this is actually what you need also. So we take a lot of our efforts into our customers and we do also, uh, understand the significant moments of truth. We are now in this, in this broadcast, David there. So you can imagine that at this moment, not thinking go wrong. Yeah. If, if, if the internet stops that we have a problem. And now, so we, we actually know that this broadcast is going on for our customers and we manage that. It's always on, uh, uh, where in the other moments in the week, we might have a little less attention, but this moment we should be there. And these moments of truth that we really embrace, we got them well described. Everybody working out line knows what the moment of truth is for our customers. Uh, uh, so we have a big logistics provider. For instance, you does not have to ask us to, uh, have, uh, a higher availability on black Friday or cyber Monday. We know that's the most important part in the year for him or her. Does it answer your question, David? >>Yes. We know as well. You know, when these big, the big game moments you have to be on your top, uh, top of your game, uh, you know, the other thing Emil about this as a service approach that I really like is, is it's a lot of it is consumption based and the data doesn't lie, you can see adoption, you know, daily, weekly, monthly. And so I wonder how you're leveraging pure as a service specifically in what kind of patterns you're seeing in, in, in the adoption. >>Uh, yeah, pure as a service for our customers is mainly never visible. Uh, we provide storage services to provide storage solutions, storage over is part of a bigger thing of a server of application. Uh, so the real benefits, to be honest, of course, towards our customer, it's all flash, uh, uh, and they have the fastest, fastest storage is available. But for ourself, we, uh, we use less resources to manage our storage. We have far more that we have a near to maintenance free storage solution now because we have it as a service and we work closely together with pure. Uh, so, uh, actually the way we treat our customers is that way pure treats us as well. And that's why there's a used click. So the real benefits, uh, uh, how we leverage is it normally we had a bunch of guys managing our storage. Now we only have one and knowing that's a shortage of it, personnel, the other persons can well be, uh, involved in other parts of our services or in other parts of an innovation. So, uh, that's simply great. >>You know, um, my takeaway the meal is that you've made infrastructure, at least, least the storage infrastructure, invisible to your customers, which is the way it should be. You didn't have to worry about it. And you've, you've also attacked the, the labor problem. You're not, you know, provisioning lungs anymore, or, you know, tuning the storage, you know, with, with arms and legs. So that's huge. So that gets me into the next topic, which is business transformation. That, that means that I can now start to attack the operational model. So I've got a different it model. Now I'm not managing infrastructure same way. So I have to shift those resources. And I'm presuming that it's a bus now becomes a business transformation discussion. How are you seeing your customers shift those resources and focus more on their business as a result of this sort of as a service trend? >>I think I do not know if they, they transform their business. Thanks to us. I think that they can more leverage their own business. They have less problems, less maintenance, et cetera, cetera, but we also add new, uh, certainties to it, like, uh, uh, the, the latest service we we released was imutable storage being the first in the Netherlands offering this thanks to, uh, thanks to the pure technology, but for customers, it takes them to give them a good night rest because, you know, we have some, uh, geopolitical issues in the world. Uh, there's a lot of hacking. People have a lot of ransomware attacks and, and we just give them a good night rest. So from a business transformation, does it transform their business? I think that gives them a comfort in running your business, knowing that certain things are well arranged. You don't have to worry about that. We will do that. We'll take it out of your hands and you just go ahead and run your business. Um, so to me, it's not really a transformation is just using the right opportunities at the right moment. >>The imutable piece is interesting because, because, but speaking of as a service, you know, anybody can go on the dark web and buy ransomware as a service. I mean, as it's seeing the, as a service economy hit, hit everywhere, the good and the, and the not so good. Um, and so I presume that your customers are, are looking at, I imutability as another service capability of the service offering and really rethinking, maybe because of the recent, you know, ransomware attacks, rethinking how they, they approach, uh, business continuance, business resilience, disaster recovery. Do you see that? >>Yep, definitely. Definitely. I tell not all of them yet. Imutable storage. So it's like an insurance as well, which you have when you have imutable storage and you have been, you have a ransomware attack at least have you part of data, which never, if data is corrupted, you cannot restore it. If your hardware is broken, you can order new hardware. Every data is corrupted. You cannot order new data. Now we got that safe and well. And so we offer them the possibility to, to do the forensics and free up their, uh, the data without tremendous loss of time. Uh, but you also see that you raise the new, uh, how do you say, uh, the new baseline for other providers as well? Eh, so there's security of the corporate information security officer, the CIO, they're all very happy with that. And they, they, they raise the baseline for us as well. So they can look at other security topics and look from say, security operation center. Cuz now we can really focus on our prime business risks because from a technical perspective, we got it covered. How can we manage the business risk, uh, which is a combination of people, processes and technology. >>Right. Makes sense. Okay. I'll give you the last word. Uh, talk about your relationship with pure, where you wanna see that that going in the future. >>Uh, I hope we've be working together for a long time. Uh, I, I ex experienced them very involved. Uh, it's not, we have done the sell and now it's all up to you now. We were closely working together. I know if I talk to my prime architect, Marcel height is very happy and it looks a little more or less if we work with pure, like we're working with colleagues, not with a supplier and a customer, uh, and uh, the whole pure concept is fascinating. Uh, I, uh, I had the opportunity to visit San Francisco head office and they told me to fish in how they launched, uh, pure being, if you want to implement it, it had to be on one credit card. The, the, the menu had to be on one credit card. Just a simple thought of put that as your big area, audacious goal to make the simplest, uh, implementable storage available. But for us, uh, it gives me the expectation that there will be a lot of more surprises with pur in the near future. Uh, and for us as a provider, what we, uh, literally really look forward to is that, that for us, these new developments will not be new migrations. It will be a gradual growth of our services or storage services. Uh, so that's what I expect. And that was what I, and we look forward to. >>Yeah, that's great. Uh, thank you so much, Emil, for coming on the, the cube and, and sharing your thoughts and best of luck to you in the future. >>Thank you. You're welcome. Thanks for having me. >>You're very welcome. Okay. In a moment, I'll be back to give you some closing thoughts on at your storage service. You're watching the cube, the leader in high tech enterprise coverage. >>Welcome to evergreen, a place where organizations grow and thrive rooted in the modern data experience in evergreen people find a seamless, simple way to leverage data through market leading sustainable technology, financial flexibility, and effortless management, allowing everyone to innovate with data confidently. Welcome to pure storage. >>Now, if you're interested in hearing more about Pure's growing portfolio of technology and services and how they're transforming the enterprise data experience, be sure to register for pure accelerate tech Fest. 22 digital event is also taking place as an in-person event. On June 8th, you can register at pure storage.com/accelerate, pure storage.com/accelerate. You're watching the cue, the leader in enterprise and emerging tech coverage.
SUMMARY :
you know, kinda looked enticing to a lot of customers and a subscription model, First pre Darie is the general manager of the digital experience At least not the way you used to you'd have to buy for Is it pressure from investors and technology companies that are chasing the all important ARR, the definition of a subscription and a service, but, you know, subscription is, and changed the thinking in enterprise data storage with a huge emphasis on simplicity. and service delivery, you need to keep that simplicity of delivery So you have a better model in Salesforce. you know, the ARR model, the, the all important, you know, financial metric, but let's talk from the customers And, you know, with the scientific method, you actually deploy something and you're like, And you need the ability to deploy It's like, you know, we do a lot of hosting at our home and you know, Which is the last thing you want. And a service gets you there on top of a subscription. So how do you ensure that your storage stays current? What do you see as new or emerging technologies that Well, the first thing is I always tell people, you can't deliver a It's not like if the car becomes disconnected from the internet, it's gonna crash and drive you off the road in uh, you know, where it sits, regardless of what content in you're on that approach is Google Azure, which suggests to me that you have to hide the underlying complexity you know, at some point in the future, maybe even, um, you know, pure mini at the edge. Yeah, technically non-trivial but uh, Hey, you guys are on it. Thanks for having me, man. the leader in high tech enterprise coverage. from day to day, making sure you never outgrow your storage. Hey Steve, great to have you on, tell us a little bit about yourself. Whether it's OnPrim or cloud or, or, or, you know, software as a service. It's gonna snowballing, you know, however you look at it, percent of spending on storage adoption there is of the model, but we do know that it's trending up, uh, you know, and every infrastructure provider From an it buyer perspective, you may have data on this, Uh, so you know, it, it's, it's beautiful for, For the storage administrator in a way that, you know, kind of old school OnPrim storage can't are, you know, moving, hopping on the, as a service bandwagon, I feel like, It's really fully integrated, you know, end to end management of my data and, And then if, you know, if you go over you, You can expand if you need to, you can shrink if you need to. I'd love to have you back. life cycle of the array from first purchase to ongoing use. feature to upgrade controllers whenever you need it. Thank you Emil for coming on the cube. What's your focus? only the spheres that we manage. Interesting, you know, a lot early on in the cloud days, highly regulated industries you also have a shortage in personnel and knowledge. I, you know, I'd like to get your perspective on this idea of as a service and the, much is that we love to see it is the way that you integrate all those solutions toward something that's workable Uh, but you I think in, in, in terms of how you work with pure, but how do you stay tightly So no, the application and services landscape, So you can imagine that at this moment, not thinking go wrong. You know, when these big, the big game moments you have to be on your So the real benefits, uh, uh, how we leverage is it normally we had a bunch of guys managing You're not, you know, provisioning lungs anymore, or, you know, tuning the storage, but for customers, it takes them to give them a good night rest because, you know, service offering and really rethinking, maybe because of the recent, you know, So it's like an insurance as well, which you have when you have imutable storage and you have been, where you wanna see that that going in the future. Uh, it's not, we have done the sell and now it's all up to you now. of luck to you in the future. Thanks for having me. You're very welcome. everyone to innovate with data confidently. you can register at pure storage.com/accelerate,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Darie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve McDowell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Emil Stan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Netherlands | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2006 | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
June 8th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Emil | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 features | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
OPEX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
two sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one credit card | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two levels | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one cloud | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Evergreen | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
second one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about five years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
one solution | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Thanksgiving | EVENT | 0.97+ |
last decade | DATE | 0.97+ |
250 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each month | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
pure storage.com/accelerate | OTHER | 0.97+ |
a decade ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
Marcel height | PERSON | 0.96+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.96+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first purchase | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Equinix | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
two pizza teams | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
30 days | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
10,000 office employees | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
two edges | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Pash DJI | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Pure | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.93+ |
Robert Christiansen, HPE | HPE Discover 2021
(upbeat music) >> Welcome to theCUBE's coverage of HPE Discover 2021. I'm Lisa Martin. Robert Christiansen joins me, one of our alumni the VP of Strategy in the Office of the CTO at HPE. Robert, it's great to see you, welcome back to the program. >> It's nice being here, Lisa. Thank you so much for having me. >> So here we are still in this virtual world. Things are opening up a little bit, which is nice but one of the things I'm excited to talk to you about today is Edge to Cloud from the customer's perspective. Obviously, that's why HPE does what it does for its customers. So let's talk about some of the things that you see from your perspective, with respect to data. We can't have a Cube conversation without talking about data, there's more and more of it, value but getting access to it quickly, getting access to it in real-time and often cases to make data-driven decisions is a challenging thing to do. Talk to me about what you see from the customer's lens. >> Well, the customer at a very highest level from the board level on down they're saying, "Hey, what is our data strategy? How are we going to put the value of data in place? Are we going to have it manifest its value in an internal fashion where it makes us run better as an organization? Can we get cost improvements? Can we move quicker with that? And then can we monetize that data if it's like very specific to an industry like healthcare or pharma or something like that? Can we expose that data to the rest of the world and give them access into what we call like data sets?" And there's a lot of that going on right now too. So we're seeing these two different angles about how they're going to manage and control that data. And you were talking about, and you mentioned it, you know the Edge related focus around that. You know, the Edges where business is done is where people actually do the transaction whether it's in a healthcare like in a hospital or a manufacturing facility et cetera. And then, but that data that they're using at that location is really important to make a decision at that location. They can't send it back to a Cloud. They can't send it back to someplace, wait for a decision to happen and then shoot it back again and say, "Hey, stop the production line because we found a defect." You need to act at that moment which the clients are saying, "Hey, can you improve my reliability? Can you give me better SLS? Can you improve the quality of my products? Can you improve healthcare in a hospital by immediate decisions?" And that is a data problem. And that requires the movement of compute and networking and storage and fundamentally the core piece of HPE's world. But in addition to that, the software necessary to take the action on that data when they detect that there's some action that needs to be taken. >> And I mentioned a minute ago, you know real-time and we've learned in the last 15 months plus. One of the things we learned is for a lot of cases, access to real-time data is no longer a nice to have. It's really going to be something, an element that separates those that succeed versus those that aren't as competitive. But I want to talk about data from a consumption perspective consumers, producers, obviously, meeting to ensure that the data consumers have what they need, what is it? What is your thought when you talk with customers, the consumers versus the producers? >> Yeah, that's a great question, Lisa. One of the key fundamental areas that HPE and the Office of the CTO has really been focused on over the last six months is something that we call data spaces and that is putting in place a platform, a set of services that connect data consumers with data producers. And when you think about that, that really isn't nothing new. I mean, you could go all the way back, if you've been around for a while remember the company called TRW and they used to have credit reporting, and they used to sell that stuff. And then it moved into Experian and those things. But you've got Bloomberg and next LexisNexis and all these companies that sell data. And they've been doing it, but it's very siloed. And so the explosion of data, the valuableness the value of the data for the consumers of it has put the producers in a position where they can't readily be discovered. And whether it be a private source of data like an IoT device and an industrial control, or a set of data that might say, "Hey, here's credit card for our data on a certain geography." Those sets need to be discovered, curated, and be made available to those who would want that. You know, for example, the folks that want to know how IoT device is working inside an industrial control or a company who's trying to lower their fraud rates on credit card transactions, like in stadiums or something like that. And so this discoverability in this space, or what you just talked about is such a core piece of what we're working on right now. And we haven't, our strategy is not only to just work on what HPE has to bring that and manifest that to the marketplace. But more importantly, how are we working with our partners to really bridge that gap and bring that next generation of services to those clients that can make those connections. >> So connecting and facilitating collaboration, absolutely key, as well as that seamless flow of data sharing without constraints. How are customers working with HPE and some of your partners to be able to create a data strategy, launch it, and start gleaning value from data faster than they can before? (Robert chuckles) >> This is the big question because it's a maturity curve. Organizations are in various states of what we call data maturity or data management maturity. They can be in very early stages. You know what we consider, you know, they just more worried about just maintaining the lights on DR strategies and make sure that data doesn't go away versus all the way through a whole cycle where they're actually governing it and putting it into what I call those discoverable buckets that are made available. And there's a whole life cycle about that. And so we see a big opportunity here for our A&PS and other professional services organizations to help people get up that maturity curve. But they also have to have the foundational tools necessary to make that happen. This is really where the Ezmeral product line or software applications really shines being able to give that undercarriage that's necessary to help that data maturity and the growth of that client to meet those data needs. And we see the data fabric being a key element to that, for that distributed model, allowing people to get access and availability to have a highly redundant, highly durable data fabric and then to build applications specifically as data-intensive applications on top of that with the Ezmeral platform all the way into our GreenLake solutions. So it's quite a journey here, Lisa. I want to just, point to the fact that HPE has done a really, really good job of positioning itself for the explosion of all of these data-intensive AI/ML workloads that are making their way into every single conversation every single enterprise to this day that wants to take advantage of the value of the data they have and to augment that data through other sources. >> One, when you think about data-intensive applications the first one that pops into my mind is Uber. And it's one of those applications that we just expect. We kind of think of as a taxi service when really it's logistics and transportation, but all of the data on the backend that it is organizing to find the ride for me at my location to take me where I'm going. The explosion of data-intensive applications is great but there's also so much more demand from consumers whether we're in business or we're consuming in our personal lives. >> It's so true and that's a very popular example. And you know, you think about the real-time necessity of what's the traffic patterns at the time I order my thing. Is it going to route me the right way? That's a very real consumer facing one, but if we click into our clients and where HPE very much is like the backbone of the global economy. We provide probably one third of the compute for the global economy and it's a staggering stat if you really think about it. Our clients, I was just talking with a client here earlier, very, very large financial services company. And they have 1200 data sets that have been selling to their clients globally. And a lot of these clients want to augment that data with their existing real-time data to come up with a solution. And so they merge it and they can determine some value through a model, an AI model. And so we're working hand-in-hand with them right now to give them that backbone so that they can deliver data sets into these other systems and then make sure they get controlled and secured. So that the company we're working with, our client has a deep sense of security that that data set is not going to find itself out into the wild somewhere. And uncontrolled for a number of reasons, from security and governance mind. But the number of use cases, Lisa are as infinite as the number of opportunities for people see value in business today. >> When you're talking about 1200 data sets that a company is selling, and of course there are many, many data sets that many types of companies consume. How do you work with them to ensure that they don't just proliferate silos, but that they get more of a unified data repository that they can act on? >> Yeah, that's a great question. A key tenant of the strategy at HPE is Open-source. So we believe in a hybrid, multi-Cloud environment meaning that as long as we all agree that we are going to standardize on Open-source technologies and APIs, we will be able to write and build applications that can natively run on any abstract platform. So for example, it's very important that we containerize, for example, and we use storage and data tools that adhere to Open standards. So if you think about that, if you write a Spark application you want that Spark application potentially to run on any of the hyperscalers, the Amazon's or the Microsoft to GCPS, or you want it to run on-premises and specifically like on HPE equipment. But the idea here is I consider one of our clients right now. I mean, think about that. One of our clients specifically ask that question that you just said. They said, "Hey, we are building out this platform, this next generation platform. And we don't want the lock-in. We want to be, we want to create that environment where that data and the data framework." So they use very specific Open -source data frameworks and they open, they use very specific application frameworks the software from the Open-source community. We were able to meet that through the Ezmeral platform. Give them a very high availability, five nines high availability, redundant, redundant geographically to geographic data centers to give them that security that they're looking for. And because of that, it's opened so many other doors for us to walk in with a Cloud strategy that is an alternative, not just the one bet to public Cloud but you haven't other opportunity to bring a Cloud strategy on-premises that is compatible with Cloud-native activities that are going on in the public Cloud. And this is at the heart of HPE strategy. I think it's just, it's been paying off. It continues to pay off. We just keep investing and keep moving down that path. I think we're going to be doing really well. >> It sounds to me that the strategy that HP is developing is highly collaborative and synergistic with your customers. Talk to me a little bit about that, especially in the last year, as we've seen a massive acceleration in digital transformation about the rapid pivot to work from home, the necessity to collaborate electronically. Talk to me a little bit about that yin and yang with HPE and its customers in terms of your strategy. >> Yeah, well, I think when COVID hit one of the very first things that just took off with VDI. Rohit Dixon and I were talking on a podcast we had earlier around the work from home strategy that was implemented almost immediately. Well, we had it already in the can, we already were doing it for many clients already but it went from like a three priority to a 12, 10 being the max. Super, super charged up on how do we get work from home secured, work from home applications and stuff in the hands of people doing, you know, when data sensitivity is super important, VDI kicks in that's on that side. But then if you start looking at the digital transformation that has to happen in the supply chain that's going on right now. The opening up of our economies it's been various starts and stops if you look around the globe. The supply chains have absolutely gone under a huge amount of pressure, because, unlike in the United States, everybody just wants everything now because things are starting to open up. I was talking to a meat packing company and a restaurant business a little while ago. And they said, "Everybody wants to order the barbecue. Now we can't get the meat for the barbecues 'cause everybody's going to the barbecues." And so the supply, this is a multi-billion dollar industry supplying meat to all of the rest of the countries and stuff like that. And so they don't have optics into that supply chain today. So they're immediately having to go through a digitization process, the transformation in something as what you would call as low tech as delivering meat. So no industry is immune, none anywhere in this whole process. And it will continue to evolve as we exit and change how we live our life going into these next couple of years. I think it's going to be phenomenal just to watch. >> Yeah, it's one of the things I call a COVID catalyst some of the silver linings that have come out of this 'cause I wouldn't have thought of the meatpacking industry as a technology field as well, but now thanks to you, I will. Last question for you. When customers in this dynamic world in which we're still living talk about Edge to Cloud are they working with you to develop a Cloud initiatives, Cloud mandates, Cloud everywhere? And if so, how do you help them start? >> Yeah, that's a great question. So again, it's like back into the data model, everybody has a different degree or a starting point that they will engage us with a strategy but specifically with what you're talking about. Almost everybody already has a Cloud strategy. So they may be at different maturity levels with that Cloud strategy. And there's almost always a Cloud group. Now, historically HPE has not had much of a foot in the Cloud group because they never really historically looked at us says that HPE is a Cloud company. But what's happened over the last couple of years with the acceleration of the acceptance of Cloud on-premises and GreenLake, specifically, and the introduction of Ezmeral and the Cloud-native infrastructure services and past layer stuff that's coming up through the Ezmeral product into our clients. It's immediately opened the door for conversations around Cloud that is available for what is staying on-premises which is in excess of 70% of the applications today. Now, if you were to take that now and extend that into the Edge conversation, what if you were able to take a smaller form factor of a GreenLake Cloud and push it more closer to an Edge location while still giving the similar capabilities, Cloud-native functions that you had before? When we're provocative with clients in that sense they suddenly open up and see the art of the possible. And so this is where we are really, really breaking down a set of paradigms of what's possible by introducing, you know, not just from the Silicon all the way up but the set of services all the way to the top of stack to the actual application that they're going to be running. And we say, "Hey, we can offer it to you in as a pay as you go model, we can get you the consumption models that are necessary, that lets you buy at the same way as the Cloud offers it. But more importantly, we'll be able to run it for you and provide you an abstraction out of that model. So you don't have to send your people out into the field to do these things. We have the software, the tools, and the systems necessary to manage it for you." But the last part is I want to be really really focused on when clients are writing that application for the Edge that matters. They are putting it into new Cloud-native architectures containers, microservices, they're using solid pipelines development pipelines, they've implemented what they call their DevOps or their DataOps practices in field, in country, if you would say. That's where we shine. And so we had a really, really good conversation start there. And so how we start that is we arrive with a set of blueprints to help them establish what that roadmap looks like. And then our professional services staff, or A&PS groups around the globe are really really set up well to help them take that trip. >> Wow, that's outstanding, Robert. We could have a whole conversation on HPE's transformation. Internet itself that was my first job in tech was at Hewlett Packard back in the day. But this has been really interesting, really getting it your vision of the customer's experience and the customer's perspective from the Office of the CTO. Great to talk to you, Robert. Thank you for sharing all that you did. This could have been a Part 2 conversation. >> Well, I'm hopeful then that we'll do Part 3 and 4 here as the months go by. So I look forward to seeing you again, Lisa. >> Deal, that's a deal. All right. >> All right. >> For Robert Christiansen, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE's coverage of HPE Discover 2021. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Office of the CTO at HPE. Thank you so much for having me. Talk to me about what you And that requires the movement One of the things we learned and manifest that to the marketplace. to be able to create a and the growth of that client that it is organizing to find the ride So that the company we're but that they get more of or the Microsoft to GCPS, about the rapid pivot to work from home, that has to happen in the supply chain of the meatpacking industry out into the field to do these things. and the customer's perspective as the months go by. Deal, that's a deal. coverage of HPE Discover 2021.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Robert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Robert Christiansen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
LexisNexis | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bloomberg | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rohit Dixon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Spark | TITLE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
4 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Part 2 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1200 data sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
TRW | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Part 3 | OTHER | 0.98+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.98+ |
multi-billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two different angles | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first job | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one third | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Ezmeral | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Experian | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
A&PS | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.93+ |
GCPS | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
five nines | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
GreenLake | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Edges | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
about 1200 data sets | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
a minute ago | DATE | 0.87+ |
first things | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
GreenLake Cloud | TITLE | 0.84+ |
last six months | DATE | 0.84+ |
Edge to Cloud | TITLE | 0.83+ |
last 15 months | DATE | 0.81+ |
Office of the CTO | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.77+ |
CTO | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
next couple of years | DATE | 0.74+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
the CTO | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
one bet | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
HPE Discover 2021 | EVENT | 0.69+ |
2021 035 Robert Christiansen
(upbeat music) >> Welcome to theCUBE's coverage of HPE Discover 2021. I'm Lisa Martin. Robert Christiansen joins me, one of our alumni the VP of Strategy in the Office of the CTO at HPE. Robert, it's great to see you, welcome back to the program. >> It's nice being here, Lisa. Thank you so much for having me. >> So here we are still in this virtual world. Things are opening up a little bit, which is nice but one of the things I'm excited to talk to you about today is Edge to Cloud from the customer's perspective. Obviously, that's why HPE does what it does for its customers. So let's talk about some of the things that you see from your perspective, with respect to data. We can't have a Cube conversation without talking about data, there's more and more of it, value but getting access to it quickly, getting access to it in real-time and often cases to make data-driven decisions is a challenging thing to do. Talk to me about what you see from the customer's lens. >> Well, the customer at a very highest level from the board level on down they're saying, "Hey, what is our data strategy? How are we going to put the value of data in place? Are we going to have it manifest its value in an internal fashion where it makes us run better as an organization? Can we get cost improvements? Can we move quicker with that? And then can we monetize that data if it's like very specific to an industry like healthcare or pharma or something like that? Can we expose that data to the rest of the world and give them access into what we call like data sets?" And there's a lot of that going on right now too. So we're seeing these two different angles about how they're going to manage and control that data. And you were talking about, and you mentioned it, you know the Edge related focus around that. You know, the Edges where business is done is where people actually do the transaction whether it's in a healthcare like in a hospital or a manufacturing facility et cetera. And then, but that data that they're using at that location is really important to make a decision at that location. They can't send it back to a Cloud. They can't send it back to someplace, wait for a decision to happen and then shoot it back again and say, "Hey, stop the production line because we found a defect." You need to act at that moment which the clients are saying, "Hey, can you improve my reliability? Can you give me better SLS? Can you improve the quality of my products? Can you improve healthcare in a hospital by immediate decisions?" And that is a data problem. And that requires the movement of compute and networking and storage and fundamentally the core piece of HPE's world. But in addition to that, the software necessary to take the action on that data when they detect that there's some action that needs to be taken. >> And I mentioned a minute ago, you know real-time and we've learned in the last 15 months plus. One of the things we learned is for a lot of cases, access to real-time data is no longer a nice to have. It's really going to be something, an element that separates those that succeed versus those that aren't as competitive. But I want to talk about data from a consumption perspective consumers, producers, obviously, meeting to ensure that the data consumers have what they need, what is it? What is your thought when you talk with customers, the consumers versus the producers? >> Yeah, that's a great question, Lisa. One of the key fundamental areas that HPE and the Office of the CTO has really been focused on over the last six months is something that we call data spaces and that is putting in place a platform, a set of services that connect data consumers with data producers. And when you think about that, that really isn't nothing new. I mean, you could go all the way back, if you've been around for a while remember the company called TRW and they used to have credit reporting, and they used to sell that stuff. And then it moved into Experian and those things. But you've got Bloomberg and next LexisNexis and all these companies that sell data. And they've been doing it, but it's very siloed. And so the explosion of data, the valuableness the value of the data for the consumers of it has put the producers in a position where they can't readily be discovered. And whether it be a private source of data like an IoT device and an industrial control, or a set of data that might say, "Hey, here's credit card for our data on a certain geography." Those sets need to be discovered, curated, and be made available to those who would want that. You know, for example, the folks that want to know how IoT device is working inside an industrial control or a company who's trying to lower their fraud rates on credit card transactions, like in stadiums or something like that. And so this discoverability in this space, or what you just talked about is such a core piece of what we're working on right now. And we haven't, our strategy is not only to just work on what HPE has to bring that and manifest that to the marketplace. But more importantly, how are we working with our partners to really bridge that gap and bring that next generation of services to those clients that can make those connections. >> So connecting and facilitating collaboration, absolutely key, as well as that seamless flow of data sharing without constraints. How are customers working with HPE and some of your partners to be able to create a data strategy, launch it, and start gleaning value from data faster than they can before? (Robert chuckles) >> This is the big question because it's a maturity curve. Organizations are in various states of what we call data maturity or data management maturity. They can be in very early stages. You know what we consider, you know, they just more worried about just maintaining the lights on DR strategies and make sure that data doesn't go away versus all the way through a whole cycle where they're actually governing it and putting it into what I call those discoverable buckets that are made available. And there's a whole life cycle about that. And so we see a big opportunity here for our A&PS and other professional services organizations to help people get up that maturity curve. But they also have to have the foundational tools necessary to make that happen. This is really where the Ezmeral product line or software applications really shines being able to give that undercarriage that's necessary to help that data maturity and the growth of that client to meet those data needs. And we see the data fabric being a key element to that, for that distributed model, allowing people to get access and availability to have a highly redundant, highly durable data fabric and then to build applications specifically as data-intensive applications on top of that with the Ezmeral platform all the way into our GreenLake solutions. So it's quite a journey here, Lisa. I want to just, point to the fact that HPE has done a really, really good job of positioning itself for the explosion of all of these data-intensive AI/ML workloads that are making their way into every single conversation every single enterprise to this day that wants to take advantage of the value of the data they have and to augment that data through other sources. >> One, when you think about data-intensive applications the first one that pops into my mind is Uber. And it's one of those applications that we just expect. We kind of think of as a taxi service when really it's logistics and transportation, but all of the data on the backend that it is organizing to find the ride for me at my location to take me where I'm going. The explosion of data-intensive applications is great but there's also so much more demand from consumers whether we're in business or we're consuming in our personal lives. >> It's so true and that's a very popular example. And you know, you think about the real-time necessity of what's the traffic patterns at the time I order my thing. Is it going to route me the right way? That's a very real consumer facing one, but if we click into our clients and where HPE very much is like the backbone of the global economy. We provide probably one third of the compute for the global economy and it's a staggering stat if you really think about it. Our clients, I was just talking with a client here earlier, very, very large financial services company. And they have 1200 data sets that have been selling to their clients globally. And a lot of these clients want to augment that data with their existing real-time data to come up with a solution. And so they merge it and they can determine some value through a model, an AI model. And so we're working hand-in-hand with them right now to give them that backbone so that they can deliver data sets into these other systems and then make sure they get controlled and secured. So that the company we're working with, our client has a deep sense of security that that data set is not going to find itself out into the wild somewhere. And uncontrolled for a number of reasons, from security and governance mind. But the number of use cases, Lisa are as infinite as the number of opportunities for people see value in business today. >> When you're talking about 1200 data sets that a company is selling, and of course there are many, many data sets that many types of companies consume. How do you work with them to ensure that they don't just proliferate silos, but that they get more of a unified data repository that they can act on? >> Yeah, that's a great question. A key tenant of the strategy at HPE is Open-source. So we believe in a hybrid, multi-Cloud environment meaning that as long as we all agree that we are going to standardize on Open-source technologies and APIs, we will be able to write and build applications that can natively run on any abstract platform. So for example, it's very important that we containerize, for example, and we use storage and data tools that adhere to Open standards. So if you think about that, if you write a Spark application you want that Spark application potentially to run on any of the hyperscalers, the Amazon's or the Microsoft to GCPS, or you want it to run on-premises and specifically like on HPE equipment. But the idea here is I consider one of our clients right now. I mean, think about that. One of our clients specifically ask that question that you just said. They said, "Hey, we are building out this platform, this next generation platform. And we don't want the lock-in. We want to be, we want to create that environment where that data and the data framework." So they use very specific Open -source data frameworks and they open, they use very specific application frameworks the software from the Open-source community. We were able to meet that through the Ezmeral platform. Give them a very high availability, five nines high availability, redundant, redundant geographically to geographic data centers to give them that security that they're looking for. And because of that, it's opened so many other doors for us to walk in with a Cloud strategy that is an alternative, not just the one bet to public Cloud but you haven't other opportunity to bring a Cloud strategy on-premises that is compatible with Cloud-native activities that are going on in the public Cloud. And this is at the heart of HPE strategy. I think it's just, it's been paying off. It continues to pay off. We just keep investing and keep moving down that path. I think we're going to be doing really well. >> It sounds to me that the strategy that HP is developing is highly collaborative and synergistic with your customers. Talk to me a little bit about that, especially in the last year, as we've seen a massive acceleration in digital transformation about the rapid pivot to work from home, the necessity to collaborate electronically. Talk to me a little bit about that yin and yang with HPE and its customers in terms of your strategy. >> Yeah, well, I think when COVID hit one of the very first things that just took off with VDI. Rohit Dixon and I were talking on a podcast we had earlier around the work from home strategy that was implemented almost immediately. Well, we had it already in the can, we already were doing it for many clients already but it went from like a three priority to a 12, 10 being the max. Super, super charged up on how do we get work from home secured, work from home applications and stuff in the hands of people doing, you know, when data sensitivity is super important, VDI kicks in that's on that side. But then if you start looking at the digital transformation that has to happen in the supply chain that's going on right now. The opening up of our economies it's been various starts and stops if you look around the globe. The supply chains have absolutely gone under a huge amount of pressure, because, unlike in the United States, everybody just wants everything now because things are starting to open up. I was talking to a meat packing company and a restaurant business a little while ago. And they said, "Everybody wants to order the barbecue. Now we can't get the meat for the barbecues 'cause everybody's going to the barbecues." And so the supply, this is a multi-billion dollar industry supplying meat to all of the rest of the countries and stuff like that. And so they don't have optics into that supply chain today. So they're immediately having to go through a digitization process, the transformation in something as what you would call as low tech as delivering meat. So no industry is immune, none anywhere in this whole process. And it will continue to evolve as we exit and change how we live our life going into these next couple of years. I think it's going to be phenomenal just to watch. >> Yeah, it's one of the things I call a COVID catalyst some of the silver linings that have come out of this 'cause I wouldn't have thought of the meatpacking industry as a technology field as well, but now thanks to you, I will. Last question for you. When customers in this dynamic world in which we're still living talk about Edge to Cloud are they working with you to develop a Cloud initiatives, Cloud mandates, Cloud everywhere? And if so, how do you help them start? >> Yeah, that's a great question. So again, it's like back into the data model, everybody has a different degree or a starting point that they will engage us with a strategy but specifically with what you're talking about. Almost everybody already has a Cloud strategy. So they may be at different maturity levels with that Cloud strategy. And there's almost always a Cloud group. Now, historically HPE has not had much of a foot in the Cloud group because they never really historically looked at us says that HPE is a Cloud company. But what's happened over the last couple of years with the acceleration of the acceptance of Cloud on-premises and GreenLake, specifically, and the introduction of Ezmeral and the Cloud-native infrastructure services and past layer stuff that's coming up through the Ezmeral product into our clients. It's immediately opened the door for conversations around Cloud that is available for what is staying on-premises which is in excess of 70% of the applications today. Now, if you were to take that now and extend that into the Edge conversation, what if you were able to take a smaller form factor of a GreenLake Cloud and push it more closer to an Edge location while still giving the similar capabilities, Cloud-native functions that you had before? When we're provocative with clients in that sense they suddenly open up and see the art of the possible. And so this is where we are really, really breaking down a set of paradigms of what's possible by introducing, you know, not just from the Silicon all the way up but the set of services all the way to the top of stack to the actual application that they're going to be running. And we say, "Hey, we can offer it to you in as a pay as you go model, we can get you the consumption models that are necessary, that lets you buy at the same way as the Cloud offers it. But more importantly, we'll be able to run it for you and provide you an abstraction out of that model. So you don't have to send your people out into the field to do these things. We have the software, the tools, and the systems necessary to manage it for you." But the last part is I want to be really really focused on when clients are writing that application for the Edge that matters. They are putting it into new Cloud-native architectures containers, microservices, they're using solid pipelines development pipelines, they've implemented what they call their DevOps or their DataOps practices in field, in country, if you would say. That's where we shine. And so we had a really, really good conversation start there. And so how we start that is we arrive with a set of blueprints to help them establish what that roadmap looks like. And then our professional services staff, or A&PS groups around the globe are really really set up well to help them take that trip. >> Wow, that's outstanding, Robert. We could have a whole conversation on HPE's transformation. Internet itself that was my first job in tech was at Hewlett Packard back in the day. But this has been really interesting, really getting it your vision of the customer's experience and the customer's perspective from the Office of the CTO. Great to talk to you, Robert. Thank you for sharing all that you did. This could have been a Part 2 conversation. >> Well, I'm hopeful then that we'll do Part 3 and 4 here as the months go by. So I look forward to seeing you again, Lisa. >> Deal, that's a deal. All right. >> All right. >> For Robert Christiansen, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE's coverage of HPE Discover 2021. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Office of the CTO at HPE. Thank you so much for having me. Talk to me about what you And that requires the movement One of the things we learned and manifest that to the marketplace. to be able to create a and the growth of that client that it is organizing to find the ride So that the company we're but that they get more of or the Microsoft to GCPS, about the rapid pivot to work from home, that has to happen in the supply chain of the meatpacking industry out into the field to do these things. and the customer's perspective as the months go by. Deal, that's a deal. coverage of HPE Discover 2021.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Robert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Robert Christiansen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
LexisNexis | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bloomberg | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rohit Dixon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Spark | TITLE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
4 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Part 2 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1200 data sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
TRW | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Part 3 | OTHER | 0.98+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.98+ |
multi-billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.98+ |
two different angles | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first job | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one third | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Ezmeral | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Experian | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
A&PS | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.93+ |
GCPS | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
five nines | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
GreenLake | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Edges | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
about 1200 data sets | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
a minute ago | DATE | 0.87+ |
first things | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
GreenLake Cloud | TITLE | 0.84+ |
last six months | DATE | 0.84+ |
Edge to Cloud | TITLE | 0.83+ |
last 15 months | DATE | 0.81+ |
Office of the CTO | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
CTO | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
next couple of years | DATE | 0.74+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
the CTO | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
one bet | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
HPE Discover 2021 | EVENT | 0.69+ |
last couple of years | DATE | 0.69+ |
Rob Harris, Stardog | AWS Startup Showcase: Innovations with CloudData & CloudOps
>>Hello, and welcome to this special presentation. This is the cube on cloud startups, our special event of Amazon web services, startup showcase. I'm John furrier, host of the cube, and excited to be here to talk about the hottest startups around cloud cloud computing data and the future of the enterprise. We've got Rob Harris, vice president of solutions consulting for star dog. Great company, Rob. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on. So this is a showcase presentation with AWS showcase startup showcase. You guys are a fast growing startup knowledge graph. We did a video explaining kind of what we did in the cube conversation. Um, really interesting category this, uh, eight hubs cloud startups with you guys. Talk about what you got. Take a minute to explain star dog and what you got. >>Sure. Yeah, here at startup, we are really a knowledge graph platform company. So we help build a knowledge graph for our customers tying together the data inside the organization and with data on the cloud in order for them to be able to find search and understand the context and relationship of all that data within their own organization. So that's really what we try to facilitate and make successful for our customers. >>Awesome. What market are you guys targeting? What's the market opportunity. Can you explain the market space that you're building product value in and what's your focus? >>Sure. Yeah, it's, it's pretty exciting. We do a lot from an industry perspective, we target a lot, uh, life sciences or financial the services, and it just tends to be, those are the ones that are most excited and getting started with this, but we certainly have a much broader set of customers in government or in manufacturing. What we really look for is the horizontal type solution, where you have a lot of systems that you want to tie together, or you want to have that understanding of your data all within context throughout your organization. So anybody struggling with that kind of tying of your data together, whether it's on the cloud or on prem, that's what we really go after >>Disruption. Who are you disrupting as you come into the marketplace? I love Amazon so hot startups because they got an eye clean take on something, but someone usually is being impacted. Who is, who are you guys disrupting as you come into? >>Yeah, a lot of times we find we're disrupting traditional ETL, right? So centralizing of all your data into one big platform, a lot of people have gone down this path of trying to create these large repositories data lakes, data warehouses. Yeah. We try to provide the additional value on top of them by not forcing you to continue to invest in moving and centralizing all your data together, but connecting it and providing context, um, while leaving and leveraging the mid worries. >>Awesome. Cause there's a big market opportunity as data warehouses becomes modernized and horizontal control planes and cloud computing is data is the key competitive advantage. Uh, great disruption. Great opportunity. So let's talk about the business star dog. What do you guys, uh, talk about the company, uh, where the headquarters is? The, how many employees what's the business model? How do you guys make money? Yeah, >>Well, a headquarters is always a little bit tricky nowadays is we were also distributed, but officially it is in Arlington Virginia. Uh, although we are all over the globe, uh, mostly in the United States and Europe, certainly as we look at, uh, how, how do we go to market and what do we do related to that? We have a subscription-based model where we help our customers get started usually small, um, by leveraging a package that they can run either on prem or in the cloud or directly from the AWS marketplace and letting them connect to the data and then growing out as they grow within their organization, larger, more interplay enterprise wide type of installations. So that's how we kind of go after it, uh, from, from our company perspective. >>So your go to market then for the company, is it bottoms up organic growth, kind of a freemium get in there? Or is it kind of a mid, mid tier or how do you guys look at that, that entry? >>It's a great question. That's exactly right. A lot of times we do start with a freemium type of model. We do have free trials and use usability to get started very quickly without having to talk to a salesperson or without having to pay up front in order to see the value, because we want you to be able to understand the value you're going to get out of our platform right off the bat and get started. Then after you've really tried it out and you see where it could apply within your organization, we help make it enterprise. >>I have to ask you how the business model of SAS, obviously clouds. Great. Are you guys leveraging Amazon web services marketplace at all? >>We are we're on the marketplace today, um, with the, both the free trial, as well as the ability through, you know, private offers to do whole production instances. So we're really excited about being a part of the marketplace. What we found is that sometimes customers want to run on the cloud. Sometimes they want to run on prem, wherever they want to run. We want to be sure that we're there. >>Yeah. Alex, let's pull up that slide on the hybrid, uh, architecture for these guys. So I want to bring this up since you brought up the business model and you talk about hybrid. This is interesting. This gets into the business model and this is kind of transitions into kind of the technology architecture. Could you walk me through this slide, the knowledge graph and the hybrid cloud. Why is this important for you guys and why is it important for customers? >>This is great. Thank you for, uh, for pulling this up. What this is really showing is as we look toward the future, as we really look at how people are deploying knowledge, graphs, and managing their data, we see that one of the big problems they're trying to address is what about cloud, uh, data that's on the cloud would a bit dated it's on prem. Maybe it's in multiple VPCs that you have within the Amazon environment. How do you tie all this together? And we all know that moving data around between all of these zones can be expensive and time consuming and difficult. And so we've come up with an architecture that allows you to run the knowledge, graph an agent of the knowledge graph in each of these zones. And they can all talk to each other and coordinate with each other. So they can see data that exists within that zone and pass it on to the other pieces as required or as needed to minimize your kind of in and out fees. And to leverage that all that data in one, in one place >>I asked you because this comes up a lot in our coverage, um, data mobility, uh, moving data is expensive. Um, how does that impact you guys in customers? A lot of people have been looking at, Hey, you know, the economics of the cloud are phenomenal, but at some point, if you've got a lot of data, you move compute to the data or you kind of think differently, how do you guys look at that? That trend? >>Yeah, that's, that's really our key value prop is people struggle with this. As people try to figure out how do I handle this large amount of data without having to generate all this additional costs about moving it around. We really look about how do I push that compute down to the storage layers, where the data already exists. And so if you think about our product architecture and you know, we, I know we have a slide on how our product is really built and how it's pulled together. When you look at our core core architecture, we have the graph that represents that connected data, but the exciting part of our architecture, what we do differently than everyone else is by allowing you to keep the data in its existing data silos, whether it's applications or repositories documents that you already have out there, we allow you to connect to that data where it is cross zone, whether it's on prem or on the cloud. >>And by leveraging the power of start on the virtualization engine, you can connect that data and be able to represent it from one source without having to move it around. But because we also have a persistence layer that's built into our product, you can really determine where's the best home. Is it data that you're going to use a lot and thereby should be really close to where the query engine is? Or is it something where you want to federate it out and leverage that compute at that storage layer itself? That flexibility is really why our customers come to us and are excited to use, start off. >>That's awesome. Great, great stuff. Love, love. The slides. Love to look at some pictures that describe the architecture both as well as the product. I love how you got the enterprise high-grade applications and then you're integrating with other partners. I think that's a really key, uh, value. And I think if you're not integrating well in this modern era, you probably won't be surviving much longer. It's pretty much a game changer at this point when knows that a question on the technology and product. Now keeping it on this theme. What's your secret sauce. Every company's got a secret sauce. What is star dog's secret sauce? >>Our secret sauce is really how do we coordinate across all of those applications? So if you can imagine you have, you know, Oracle database or Redshift repository, and you're trying to be able to unify that data in real time across those applications. There's a lot of thought and needs to go about how to do that efficiently. You don't want to take all the database from both repositories, move them, all that data into one place and then figure it out. And so our query planner, how do we coordinate across the multiple applications is really what makes us different and special >>On the Symantec modeling that you're doing? Because I see there's a lot of data there. You got to kind of get an understanding context. Um, how do you guys look at reusability metadata on data? This has become a very key point on not just data warehouse, but it's becoming much more about addressability and discoverability in as fast as possible, low latency, uh, with intelligence, this has been a big discussion. How do you guys look at that aspect of the reusability of the data? >>Yeah, it's, it's one of the exciting parts about starting with a semantic graph and then extending into these capabilities around virtualization and reasoning and inference by starting with the semantic graph, we allow you to, you know, incrementally invest in building out your model and then being able to reuse that model as you, as you go through your implementations. Yeah. That's been a, a big failing as people have looked at the analytical movements recently is so many times people spin up a repository, they answer a particular question and they do an absolutely fine job, but then we have your next question. You have to spin up another repository, build more views, re ETL the data. And then the semantic technology is what allows you to create that common understanding and reuse it over and over and over again. And I think it's time for that to hit mainstream. You know, it's been around a while. It's something that has taken some time to get some adoption around, but now that we really have build up awareness around it and we've shelled, the technology can scale the large volumes. Uh, I think it's time to be able to leverage the value that reasonability brings. Yeah. >>One final question on the product and the technology and kind of the architecture is how do you guys connect the dots going forward as more and more edge nodes become available in the network as that architecture of hybrid that we talked earlier about becomes so complex and so connected. I mean, you could have more connectedness than ever before. Um, it's very complex networks graph theory, right? You're talking about a lot of edges and a lot of traversal it's billions and billions of edges. I mean, this is it's complicated. How do you guys create, how do you guys see that unfolding and how and why the star dog remained relevant in that configuration? >>Yeah. And the simple fact is that people need help, right? It can't be that you're going to define all those edges and connections by hand yourself through some systems or keys. It's a great way to get started, but it's not sufficient in order to really get the value out of that graph that you expect. And the ways we do that is twofold. The first bit is really an influencing or reasoning capability. Being able to look at this structure of the data, how it's composed and create connections between that data based on, you know, logical, logical rules. The second is machine learning, right? Machine learning is high. We use things like linear regression algorithms or other types of community detection algorithms in order to build more connections in the data so that you can get really unlock that value that you're looking for. When you're leveraging graph technology, >>A lot of secret sauce here, a lot of technology graph, super exciting. Let's get into the final segment around customer traction and what you guys have seen with customers. Um, what are some of the use cases that are popular and what happens if customers aren't going down this road? What are they missing out on? Um, I mean, it's the classic fear of missing out and fear of getting screwed over right. Are going out of business. I mean, that's, that's motivational at some level, but you know, there are the, do I wait and people who waited on cloud computing by the way were left behind and some never survived. So we're almost in this same dynamic with customers. At some point you got to put the toe in the water, so to speak or get going to take us through some customer examples and use cases where, >>Or this is working. Yeah. I think both of those areas are, are, uh, great ones to hit on. So when you think about what are we missing out on one of our largest customer bases really in pharmaceuticals. Yeah. And they're using this technology in order to find more connections in the data so that they can really decrease the amount of time for getting a drug to market on the research and development. They can look more at leveraging the data they've already connected using related items to be able to accelerate their investments and waiting costs them hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars. So there are certainly ones where being able to adopt this technology early and get value out of early, really pays off in. And they're not the only ones. That's the only, that's the only the life sciences space. But there's also the idea to use it, as you said, really about what else am I missing out on? >>And the data fabric movement, this movement around, how do I lower the cost in my organization about moving data around creating more ETL jobs, leveraging all these data assets already have that the data fabric movement is the idea of how do we really automate that? How do we accelerate that? How do we make that an easier process so that it just doesn't cost as much to manage all this data in an organization. And I've observed that more and more. We have customers coming to us, really interested in this type of use cases that relates to our technology and they are getting ahead of their competitors by really lowering their, it costs in line to focus on these higher value activities. >>Life of the customers is what for you with, with startup? Why, how do they win? What's the reason why they buy and take the freemium. And when do they convert over? Well, take me through the progression of value. When do they see something and why do they increase their sure. >>Assumption? Yeah. That, I mean, the bottom line is you want to try to get more value out of your data at a lower cost and make it easier and faster to do. And so getting started in a single use case, trying out our free version, representing your data and taking a look at what it could look like under a common model, connecting it up with our virtualization services is a great way to try out the technology and really, you know, put your toe in the water to see is this something that would be a value to organization as you see that value unlock is you really understand that you can leverage these days assets with this lower time to value, you know, days in order to unlock a whole repository and connected to another repository. That's where we love to engage with you and help show you how you can make that successful in a more production environment. >>I like about some of the things you're talking about star dog has kind of that aspirin aspect, but also a growth, um, uh, vitamin E as well, in terms of the value proposition, a lot of companies are overwhelmed with the data, but yet you have this path towards more creation of value through the knowledge graph and reasoning and other other value. When does a customer, and this is kind of comes back to the customers who are out there potentially watching prospects or future customers. When do they know they need to call you guys up? Is it because they have too many sources? Could you take me through what it, what it looks like in a prospect's environment where they would really win with start a what's it look like? What are some of the signs that they need to engage, start out? >>Yeah. The two big things that we've seen repeated in our customer base over and over again, is if you have a large number of systems out there that aren't connected, that you don't see how all the data it can be pulled together between those systems, because the different data formats or different languages or different ways that the data is created in those systems start off, can certainly help. The second is if you have a large data warehouse or a data Lake, and you don't see the value being generated out of that, because people don't understand where the data is or what context it has with other data within those repositories, both of those situations are one where we think you'd get a lot of value out of start off. And we'd love to talk to you. >>So would, so just secondly, understand this. So if you have a lot of systems that either are not connected or connected, whatever, that's great, a lot of sources sitting around, you know, whether it's spreadsheets or Oracle or >>Red shift, whatever it is, we've loved it that's right. >>Ingest as much as possible from sources >>That's right. Ingest or connect. I mean, that's really the value that we bring is you don't have to pull it all in. You can just map and leverage the data where it lives. We have customers that have petabyte repositories that just mapped that data in to start off, and we can really facilitate pulling out the value of those systems without you having to move it around again, to another request, >>Ingest, connect, and visually see value. That's right. It sounds, it sounds like a tagline, um, great stuff. So just give some examples of who's using it. What big names? Um, obviously you guys, aren't hot startup coming out of the Amazon cloud showcase. Uh, congratulations. What are some names that have worked with you guys that can give an indicator of the company that you're keeping right now in terms of, >>Yeah, I mean our largest customer by far right now, our longest customer has been NASA. Um, so they've been a really exciting user of the platform we've been really to see them leverage the platform. Schneider electric has been a long time user, uh, Bayer FINRA in the U S which is a financial services watchdog organization. These are customers that are getting a lot of value out of our platform today, and we're excited to work with them. >>Awesome, Rob, great to see you. Congratulations. Uh, take a minute to just give the plug for the commercial. How do we engage? What's the culture like, um, you guys hiring, what's the, what's the state of that? What's the state of the company. >>Yeah, no, it's a, it's a great thank you for, uh, for bringing that up where, you know, we're an exciting growing company. Um, as we really reach out more and more to connect more people's data, we find that we're always looking at more resources on building out more conductivity between the individual data sources. So more understanding on that front, as well as more, a professional services type folks to help people through the process. We've really been trying to minimize the amount of effort that you have to have in order to get started, but we know that people like a helping hands. So we're always looking for people we're always growing and we're excited to have the chance to, you know, bring this technology out beyond just the semantic group that is historically been here. >>You know, you've got a great job. Vice-president solutions consulting, essentially you're in a product role, but more like a solution architect meets products, uh, customer facing, and also product century. You're kind of the center of all the action. So what's the coolest thing you've seen, um, from a customer standpoint or an architecture or, um, a deployment or an engagement that you've been involved with. That's been kind of like, Oh, wow, that's cool. That's game. That's something new that we've been, we wouldn't have seen a few years ago. Take us through just an example, anecdotal, you don't have to share the company name or you. >>That's a great question. Um, there is a company that is working on self-driving cars and being able to leverage the knowledge graph to pull together all of the videos and material they get from the vehicles themselves, as well as static information about the sensors. Uh, that's been pretty exciting to see. I, I, I just recently purchased the festival myself. So I'm excited about the whole self-driving car world and to be able to help them participate with these companies is, is pretty exciting. Um, we, we just help one of the large drug manufacturers come to market with one of their drugs earlier than expected. You know, that's a, that's a pretty exciting feeling to know that you can really help people, um, by just connecting the data they already have and letting them leverage those resources, uh, that that really is something that we're going to be very calm >>And the bridge to the future that the customers have to cross with you is also pretty compelling. You got industrial IOT and more and more data to take a quick minute to describe what that future looks like. >>Yeah. You know, as we see more and more automation in this process, we see a couple of different really, you know, exploding areas. The first off, you know, you hit the nail on the head is data being able to bring in more edge devices, being able to really process that data on the fly and be able to help answer questions as these changes in data are occur within these sources. Um, that's certainly part of the future. And the other thing that we're really excited about is this more automatic data discovery with an organization. How can we have an agent that goes out and kind of can infer really even what your data is about in the structure of your data without a lot of input for you. And so we've been working a lot with building up these models automatically and letting you have the foundation for integrating your data, um, and just the push of a button. So we're excited about walking, Alexa, our customers in this journey as well. >>It's, it's a fun area. You talk about reasoning. That's one of the key value propositions that you guys have. You talk about AI, you talk about bots and soon it's going to be thinking machines for us. They're going to be doing all the work. >>I hope they're not too soon, but I am excited about that idea as well. I can go. I do think that, uh, you know, if you look at organizations today, it's fascinating how it's not, that the problems are different, but we're trying to automate as much of it as possible so that we can work on that, the real value clumps of our organizations. And it's not that kind of drudgery work. I started as a DBA back in my career, um, just trying to keep the database up and running, you know, nowadays, you know, all these autonomous databases and self indexing, and self-correcting, it's just not a passive lead as much anymore. You know, we hope we can bring that to the data infrastructure automation. >>It's a double-edged sword gun, right. It's amazing, done wrong. It could cause some damage and flipped some, some pain and hurt. And so you got to figure it out, got to have the right data sets, gotta have the right software, um, and a great future. Rob Harris, congratulations for being a cannabis startup showcase here on the cube on cloud startups, uh, with AWS, uh, led partnership. Thank you for coming on and being part of this event. Thank you again. Okay. Rob Harris, vice president solutions consulting at star dog here for the coupon cloud. I'm John furrier. Thanks for watching. >>Yeah.
SUMMARY :
this, uh, eight hubs cloud startups with you guys. inside the organization and with data on the cloud in order for them to be able to find search What market are you guys targeting? What we really look for is the horizontal type solution, where you have a lot of systems that you want Who is, who are you guys disrupting as you come into? the additional value on top of them by not forcing you to continue to invest in moving How do you guys make money? uh, how, how do we go to market and what do we do related to that? the value, because we want you to be able to understand the value you're going to get out of our platform right off I have to ask you how the business model of SAS, obviously clouds. through, you know, private offers to do whole production instances. So I want to bring this up since you brought up the business model and you talk about hybrid. And so we've come up with an architecture that allows you to run the knowledge, Um, how does that impact you guys in documents that you already have out there, we allow you to connect to that data where it is And by leveraging the power of start on the virtualization engine, you can connect I love how you got the enterprise high-grade applications and then you're integrating So if you can imagine you have, you know, Oracle database or Redshift repository, Um, how do you guys look at reusability metadata on data? with the semantic graph, we allow you to, you know, incrementally invest in One final question on the product and the technology and kind of the architecture is how do you guys connect detection algorithms in order to build more connections in the data so that you can get really unlock segment around customer traction and what you guys have seen with customers. connections in the data so that they can really decrease the amount of time for getting a drug to market on have that the data fabric movement is the idea of how do we really automate that? Life of the customers is what for you with, with startup? to try out the technology and really, you know, put your toe in the water to see is this a lot of companies are overwhelmed with the data, but yet you have this path towards more creation of value through the knowledge is if you have a large number of systems out there that aren't connected, that you don't So if you have a lot of systems that either are not connected or connected, I mean, that's really the value that we bring is you don't have to pull it all in. What are some names that have worked with you guys that can give an indicator of the company that you're keeping right Bayer FINRA in the U S which is a financial services watchdog organization. What's the culture like, um, you guys hiring, We've really been trying to minimize the amount of effort that you have to have in order to Take us through just an example, anecdotal, you don't have to share the company name or You know, that's a, that's a pretty exciting feeling to know that you can really And the bridge to the future that the customers have to cross with you is also pretty compelling. And so we've been working a lot with building up these models automatically and letting you have That's one of the key value propositions that you guys have. I do think that, uh, you know, if you look at organizations today, And so you got to figure it out, got to have the right data sets,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Rob Harris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NASA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
billions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Symantec | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
hundreds of millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Schneider electric | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Arlington Virginia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Bayer | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Alex | PERSON | 0.99+ |
billions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
star dog | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first bit | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One final question | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one source | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
single use case | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
billions of edges | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Stardog | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
two big things | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
U S | LOCATION | 0.89+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
secondly | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Alexa | TITLE | 0.87+ |
one big platform | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
both repositories | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
double-edged | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
eight hubs | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.73+ |
FINRA | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
Redshift | TITLE | 0.7+ |
vitamin E | OTHER | 0.69+ |
cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.49+ |
AWS Startup | EVENT | 0.47+ |
CloudOps | ORGANIZATION | 0.4+ |
VxRail: Taking HCI to Extremes
>> Announcer: From the Cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is theCube Conversation. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman. And welcome to this special presentation. We have a launch from Dell Technologies updates from the VxRail family. We're going to do things a little bit different here. We actually have a launch video Shannon Champion, of Dell Technologies. And the way we do things a lot of times, is, analysts get a little preview or when you're watching things. You might have questions on it. So, rather than me just wanting it, or you wanting yourself I actually brought in a couple of Dell Technologies expertS two of our Cube alumni, happy to welcome you back to the program. Jon Siegal, he is the Vice President of Product Marketing, and Chad Dunn, who's the Vice President of Product Management, both of them with Dell Technologies. Gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us. >> Good to see you Stu. >> Great to be here. >> All right, and so what we're going to do is we're going to be rolling the video here. I've got a button I'm going to press, Andrew will stop it here and then we'll kind of dig in a little bit, go into some questions when we're all done. We're actually holding a crowd chat, where you will be able to ask your questions, talk to the experts and everything. And so a little bit different way to do a product announcement. Hope you enjoy it. And with that, it's VxRail. Taking HCI to the extremes is the theme. We'll see what that means and everything. But without any further ado, let's let Shannon take the video away. >> Hello, and welcome. My name is Shannon Champion, and I'm looking forward to taking you through what's new with VxRail. Let's get started. We have a lot to talk about. Our launch covers new announcements addressing use cases across the Core, Edge and Cloud and spans both new hardware platforms and options, as well as the latest in software innovations. So let's jump right in. Before we talk about our announcements, let's talk about where customers are adopting VxRail today. First of all, on behalf of the entire Dell Technologies and VxRail teams, I want to thank each of our over 8000 customers, big and small in virtually every industry, who've chosen VxRail to address a broad range of workloads, deploying nearly 100,000 nodes today. Thank you. Our promise to you is that we will add new functionality, improve serviceability, and support new use cases, so that we deliver the most value to you, whether in the Core, at the Edge or for the Cloud. In the Core, VxRail from day one has been a catalyst to accelerate IT transformation. Many of our customers started here and many will continue to leverage VxRail to simply extend and enhance your VMware environment. Now we can support even more demanding applications such as In-Memory databases, like SAP HANA, and more AI and ML applications, with support for more and more powerful GPUs. At the Edge, video surveillance, which also uses GPUs, by the way, is an example of a popular use case leveraging VxRail alongside external storage. And right now we all know the enhanced role that IT is playing. And as it relates to VDI, VxRail has always been a great option for that. In the Cloud, it's all about Kubernetes, and how Dell Technologies Cloud platform, which is VCF on VxRail can deliver consistent infrastructure for both traditional and Cloud native applications. And we're doing that together with VMware. VxRail is the only jointly engineered HCI system built with VMware for VMware environments, designed to enhance the native VMware experience. This joint engineering with VMware and investments in software innovation together deliver an optimized operational experience at reduced risk for our customers. >> Alright, so Shannon talked a bit about, the important role of IT Of course right now, with the global pandemic going on. It's really, calling in, essential things, putting, platforms to the test. So, I really love to hear what both of you are hearing from customers. Also, VDI, of course, in the early days, it was, HCI-only-does-VDI. Now, we know there are many solutions, but remote work is putting that back front and center. So, Jon, why don't we start with you as the what is (muffled speaking) >> Absolutely. So first of all, Stu, thank you, I want to do a shout out to our VxRail customers around the world. It's really been humbling, inspiring, and just amazing to see The impact of our VxRail customers around the world and what they're having on on human progress here. Just for a few examples, there are genomics companies that we have running VxRail that have rolled out testing at scale. We also have research universities out in the Netherlands, doing the antibody detection. The US Navy has stood up a floating hospital to of course care for those in need. So we are here to help that's been our message to our customers, but it's amazing to see how much they're helping society during this. So just just a pleasure there. But as you mentioned, just to hit on the VDI comments, so to your points too, HCI, VxRail, VDI, that was an initial use case years ago. And it's been great to see how many of our existing VxRail customers have been able to pivot very quickly leveraging VxRail to add and to help bring their remote workforce online and support them with their existing VxRail. Because VxRail is flexible, it is agile, to be able to support those multiple workloads. And in addition to that, we've also rolled out some new VDI bundles to make it simpler for customers more cost effective cater to everything from knowlEdge workers to multimedia workers. You name it, you know from 250, desktops up to 1000. But again, back to your point VxRail, HCI, is well beyond VDI, it crossed the chasm a couple years ago actually. And VDI now is less than a third of the typical workloads, any of our customers out there, it supports now a range of workloads that you heard from Shannon, whether it's video surveillance, whether it's general purpose, all the way to mission critical applications now with SAP HAN. So, this has changed the game for sure. But the range of work loads and the flexibility of the actual rules which really helping our existing customers during this pandemic. >> Yeah, I agree with you, Jon, we've seen customers really embrace HCI for a number of workloads in their environments, from the ones that we sure all knew and loved back in the initial days of HCI. Now, the mission critical things now to Cloud native workloads as well, and the sort of the efficiencies that customers are able to get from HCI. And specifically, VxRail gives them that ability to pivot. When these, shall we say unexpected circumstances arise? And I think that that's informing their their decisions and their opinions on what their IP strategies look like as they move forward. They want that same level of agility, and ability to react quickly with their overall infrastructure. >> Excellent. Now I want to get into the announcements. What I want my team actually, your team gave me access to the CIO from the city of Amarillo, so maybe they can dig up that footage, talk about how fast they pivoted, using VxRail to really spin up things fast. So let's hear from the announcement first and then definitely want to share that that customer story a little bit later. So let's get to the actual news that Shannon's going to share. >> Okay, now what's new? I am pleased to announce a number of exciting updates and new platforms, to further enable IT modernization across Core, Edge and Cloud. I will cover each of these announcements in more detail, demonstrating how only VxRail can offer the breadth of platform configurations, automation, orchestration and Lifecycle Management, across a fully integrated hardware and software full stack with consistent, simplified operations to address the broadest range of traditional and modern applications. I'll start with hybrid Cloud and recap what you may have seen in the Dell Technologies Cloud announcements just a few weeks ago, related to VMware Cloud foundation on VxRail. Then I'll cover two brand new VxRail hardware platforms and additional options. And finally circle back to talk about the latest enhancements to our VxRail HCI system software capabilities for Lifecycle Management. Let's get started with our new Cloud offerings based on VxRail. VxRail is the HCI foundation for Dell Technologies, Cloud Platform, bringing automation and financial models, similar to public Cloud to On-premises environments. VMware recently introduced Cloud foundation for Delta, which is based on vSphere 7.0. As you likely know by now, vSphere 7.0 was definitely an exciting and highly anticipated release. In keeping with our synchronous release commitment, we introduced VxRail 7.0 based on vSphere 7.0 in late April, which was within 30 days of VMware's release. Two key areas that VMware focused on we're embedding containers and Kubernetes into vSphere, unifying them with virtual machines. And the second is improving the work experience for vSphere administrators with vSphere Lifecycle Manager or VLCM. I'll address the second point a bit in terms of how VxRail fits in in a moment for VCF 4 with Tom Xu, based on vSphere 7.0 customers now have access to a hybrid Cloud platform that supports native Kubernetes workloads and management, as well as your traditional VM-based workloads. So containers are now first class citizens of your private Cloud alongside traditional VMs and this is now available with VCF 4.0, on VxRail 7.0. VxRail's tight integration with VMware Cloud foundation delivers a simple and direct path not only to the hybrid Cloud, but also to deliver Kubernetes at Cloud scale with one complete automated platform. The second Cloud announcement is also exciting. Recent VCF for networking advancements have made it easier than ever to get started with hybrid Cloud, because we're now able to offer a more accessible consolidated architecture. And with that Dell Technologies Cloud platform can now be deployed with a four-node configuration, lowering the cost of an entry level hybrid Cloud. This enables customers to start smaller and grow their Cloud deployment over time. VCF and VxRail can now be deployed in two different ways. For small environments, customers can utilize a consolidated architecture which starts with just four nodes. Since the management and workload domains share resources in this architecture, it's ideal for getting started with an entry level Cloud to run general purpose virtualized workloads with a smaller entry point. Both in terms of required infrastructure footprint as well as cost, but still with a Consistent Cloud operating model. For larger environments where dedicated resources and role-based access control to separate different sets of workloads is usually preferred. You can choose to deploy a standard architecture which starts at eight nodes for independent management and workload domains. A standard implementation is ideal for customers running applications that require dedicated workload domains that includes Horizon, VDI, and vSphere with Kubernetes. >> Alright, Jon, there's definitely been a lot of interest in our community around everything that VMware is doing with vSphere 7.0. understand if you wanted to use the Kubernetes piece, it's VCF as that so we've seen the announcements, Dell, partnering in there it helps us connect that story between, really the VMware strategy and how they talk about Cloud and where does VxRail fit in that overall, Delta Cloud story? >> Absolutely. So first of all Stu, the VxRail course is integral to the Delta Cloud strategy. it's been VCF on VxRail equals the Delta Cloud platform. And this is our flagship on prem Cloud offering, that we've been able to enable operational consistency across any Cloud, whether it's On-prem, in the Edge or in the public Cloud. And we've seen the Dell tech Cloud Platform embraced by customers for a couple key reasons. One is it offers the fastest hybrid Cloud deployment in the market. And this is really, thanks to a new subscription offer that we're now offering out there where in less than 14 days, it can be still up and running. And really, the Dell tech Cloud does bring a lot of flexibility in terms of consumption models, overall when it comes to VxRail. Secondly, I would say is fast and easy upgrades. This is what VxRail brings to the table for all workloads, if you will, into especially critical in the Cloud. So the full automation of Lifecycle Management across the hardware and software stack across the VMware software stack, and in the Dell software and hardware supporting that, together, this enables essentially the third thing, which is customers can just relax. They can be rest assured that their infrastructure will be continuously validated, and always be in a continuously validated state. And this is the kind of thing that those three value propositions together really fit well, with any on-prem Cloud. Now you take what Shannon just mentioned, and the fact that now you can build and run modern applications on the same VxRail infrastructure alongside traditional applications. This is a game changer. >> Yeah, I love it. I remember in the early days talking with Dunn about CI, how does that fit in with Cloud discussion and the line I've used the last couple years is, modernize the platform, then you can modernize the application. So as companies are doing their full modernization, then this plays into what you're talking about. All right, we can let Shannon continue, we can get some more before we dig into some more analysis. >> That's good. >> Let's talk about new hardware platforms and updates. that result in literally thousands of potential new configuration options. covering a wide breadth of modern and traditional application needs across a range of the actual use cases. First up, I am incredibly excited to announce a brand new Dell EMC VxRail series, the D series. This is a ruggedized durable platform that delivers the full power of VxRail for workloads at the Edge in challenging environments or for space constrained areas. VxRail D series offers the same compelling benefits as the rest of the VxRail portfolio with simplicity, agility and lifecycle management. But in a lightweight short depth at only 20 inches, it's adorable form factor that's extremely temperature-resilient, shock resistant, and easily portable. It even meets milspec standards. That means you have the full power of lifecycle automation with VxRail HCI system software and 24 by seven single point of support, enabling you to rapidly react to business needs, no matter the location or how harsh the conditions. So whether you're deploying a data center at a mobile command base, running real-time GPS mapping on the go, or implementing video surveillance in remote areas, you can ensure availability, integrity and confidence for every workload with the new VxRail ruggedized D series. >> All right, Chad we would love for you to bring us in a little bit that what customer requirement for bringing this to market. I remember seeing, Dell servers ruggedized, of course, Edge, really important growth to build on what Jon was talking about, Cloud. So, Chad, bring us inside, what was driving this piece of the offering? >> Sure Stu. Yeah, yeah, having been at the hardware platforms that can go out into some of these remote locations is really important. And that's being driven by the fact that customers are looking for compute performance and storage out at some of these Edges or some of the more exotic locations. whether that's manufacturing plants, oil rigs, submarine ships, military applications, places that we've never heard of. But it's also about extending that operational simplicity of the the sort of way that you're managing your data center that has VxRails you're managing your Edges the same way using the same set of tools. You don't need to learn anything else. So operational simplicity is absolutely key here. But in those locations, you can take a product that's designed for a data center where definitely controlling power cooling space and take it some of these places where you get sand blowing or seven to zero temperatures, could be Baghdad or it could be Ketchikan, Alaska. So we built this D series that was able to go to those extreme locations with extreme heat, extreme cold, extreme altitude, but still offer that operational simplicity. Now military is one of those applications for the rugged platform. If you look at the resistance that it has to heat, it operates at a 45 degrees Celsius or 113 degrees Fahrenheit range, but it can do an excursion up to 55 C or 131 degrees Fahrenheit for up to eight hours. It's also resistant to heat sand, dust, vibration, it's very lightweight, short depth, in fact, it's only 20 inches deep. This is a smallest form factor, obviously that we have in the VxRail family. And it's also built to be able to withstand sudden shocks certified to withstand 40 G's of shock and operation of the 15,000 feet of elevation. Pretty high. And this is sort of like wherever skydivers go to when they want the real thrill of skydiving where you actually need oxygen to, to be for that that altitude. They're milspec-certified. So, MIL-STD-810G, which I keep right beside my bed and read every night. And it comes with a VxRail stick hardening package is packaging scripts so that you can auto lock down the rail environment. And we've got a few other certifications that are on the roadmap now for naval shock requirements. EMI and radiation immunity often. >> Yeah, it's funny, I remember when we first launched it was like, "Oh, well everything's going to white boxes. "And it's going to be massive, "no differentiation between everything out there." If you look at what you're offering, if you look at how public Clouds build their things, but I called it a few years or is there's a pure optimization. So you need to scale, you need similarities but you know you need to fit some, very specific requirements, lots of places, so, interesting stuff. Yeah, certifications, always keep your teams busy. Alright, let's get back to Shannon to view on the report. >> We are also introducing three other hardware-based additions. First, a new VxRail E Series model based on where the first time AMD EPYC processors. These single socket 1U nodes, offer dual socket performance with CPU options that scale from eight to 64 Cores, up to a terabyte of memory and multiple storage options making it an ideal platform for desktop VDI analytics and computer aided design. Next, the addition of the latest Nvidia Quadro RTX GPUs brings the most significant advancement in computer graphics in over a decade to professional work flows. Designers and artists across industries can now expand the boundary of what's possible, working with the largest and most complex graphics rendering, deep learning and visual computing workloads. And Intel Optane DC persistent memory is here, and it offers high performance and significantly increased memory capacity with data persistence at an affordable price. Data persistence is a critical feature that maintains data integrity, even when power is lost, enabling quicker recovery and less downtime. With support for Intel obtain DC persistent memory customers can expand in memory intensive workloads and use cases like SAP HANA. Alright, let's finally dig into our HCI system software, which is the Core differentiation for VxRail regardless of your workload or platform choice. Our joining engineering with VMware and investments in VxRail HCI system software innovation together deliver an optimized operational experience at reduced risk for our customers. Under the covers, VxRail offers best in class hardware, married with VMware HCI software, either vSAN or VCF. But what makes us different stems from our investments to integrate the two. Dell Technologies has a dedicated VxRail team of about 400 people to build market sell and support a fully integrated hyper converged system. That team has also developed our unique VxRail HCI system software, which is a suite of integrated software elements that extend VMware native capabilities to deliver seamless, automated operational experience that customers cannot find elsewhere. The key components of VxRail HCI system software shown around the arc here that include the extra manager, full stack lifecycle management, ecosystem connectors, and support. I don't have time to get into all the details of these elements today, but if you're interested in learning more, I encourage you to meet our experts. And I will tell you how to do that in a moment. I touched on the LCM being a key feature to the vSphere 7.0 earlier and I'd like to take the opportunity to expand on that a bit in the context of VxRail Lifecycle Management. The LCM adds valuable automation to the execution of updates for customers, but it doesn't eliminate the manual work still needed to define and package the updates and validate all of the components prior to applying them. With VxRail customers have all of these areas addressed automatically on their behalf, freeing them to put their time into other important functions for their business. Customers tell us that Lifecycle management continues to be a major source of the maintenance effort they put into their infrastructure, and then it tends to lead to overburden IT staff, that it can cause disruptions to the business if not managed effectively, and that it isn't the most efficient economically. Automation of Lifecycle Management and VxRail results in the utmost simplicity from a customer experience perspective, and offers operational freedom from maintaining infrastructure. But as shown here, our customers not only realize greater IT team efficiencies, they have also reduced downtime with fewer unplanned outages, and reduced overall cost of operations. With VxRail HCI system software, intelligent Lifecycle Management upgrades of the fully integrated hardware and software stack are automated, keeping clusters and continuously validated states while minimizing risks and operational costs. How do we ensure Continuously validated states for VxRail. VxRail labs execute an extensive, automated, repeatable process on every firmware and software upgrade and patch to ensure clusters are in continuously validated states of the customers choosing across their VxRail environment. The VxRail labs are constantly testing, analyzing, optimizing, and sequencing all of the components in the upgrade to execute in a single package for the full stack. All the while VxRail is backed by Dell EMC's world class services and support with a single point of contact for both hardware and software. IT productivity skyrockets with single click non disruptive upgrades of the fully integrated hardware and software stack without the need to do extensive research and testing. taking you to the next VxRail version of your choice, while always in a continuously validated state. You can also confidently execute automated VxRail upgrades. No matter what hardware generation or node types are in the cluster. They don't have to all be the same. And upgrades with VxRail are faster and more efficient with leapfrogging simply choose any VxRail version you desire. And be assured you will get there in a validated state while seamlessly bypassing any other release in between. Only VxRail can do that. >> All right, so Chad, the lifecycle management piece that Shannon was just talking about is, not the sexiest, it's often underappreciated. There's not only the years of experience, but the continuous work you're doing, reminds me back the early vSAN deployments versus VxRail jointly developed, jointly tested between Dell and VMware. So bring us inside why, 2020 Lifecycle Management still, a very important piece, especially in the VM family line. >> Yes, Stu, I think it's sexy, but, I'm pretty big nerd. (all laughing) Yeah, this is really always been our bread and butter. And in fact, it gets even more important, the larger the deployments come, when you start to look at data centers full of VxRails and all the different hardware software, firmware combinations that could exist out there. It's really the value that you get out of that VxRail HCI system software that Shannon was talking about and how it's optimized around the VMware use case. Very tightly integrated with each VMware component, of course, and the intelligence of being able to do all the firmware, all of the drivers, all the software all together in tremendous value to our customers. But to deliver that we really need to make a fairly large investment. So as Shannon mentioned, we run about 25,000 hours of testing across Each major release for patches, express patches, that's about 7000 hours for each of those. So, obviously, there's a lot of parallelism. And we're always developing new test scenarios for each release that we need to build in as we as we introduce new functionality. And one of the key things that we're able to do, as Shannon mentioned, is to be able to leapfrog releases and get you to that next validated state. We've got about 100 engineers just working on creating and executing those test cases on a continuous basis and obviously, a huge amount of automation. And we've talked about that investment to execute those tests. That's one worth of $60 million of investment in our lab. In fact, we've got just over 2000 VxRail units in our testbed across the US, Shanghai, China and Cork, Ireland. So a massive amount of testing of each of those components to make sure that they operate together in a validated state. >> Yeah, well, absolutely, it's super important not only for the day one, but the day two deployments. But I think this actually a great place for us to bring in that customer that Dell gave me access to. So we've got the CIO of Amarillo, Texas, he was an existing VxRail customer. And he's going to explain what happened as to how he needed to react really fast to support the work-from-home initiative, as well as we get to hear in his words the value of what Lifecycle Management means. So Andrew, if we could queue up that customer segment, please? >> It's been massive and it's been interesting to see the IT team absorb it. As we mature, I think they embrace the ability to be innovative and to work with our departments. But this instance, really justified why I was driving progress. So fervently why it was so urgent today. Three years ago, the answer would have been no. We wouldn't have been in a place where we could adapt With VxRail in place, in a week we spun up hundreds of instant balls. We spun up a 75-person call center in a day and a half, for our public health. We rolled out multiple applications for public health so they could do remote clinics. It's given us the flexibility to be able to roll out new solutions very quickly and be very adaptive. And it's not only been apparent to my team, but it's really made an impact on the business. And now what I'm seeing is those of my customers that work, a little lagging or a little conservative, or understanding the impact of modernizing the way they do business because it makes them adaptable as well. >> Alright, so great, Richard, you talked a bunch about the the efficiencies that that the IT put in place, how about that, that overall just managed, you talked about how fast you spun up these new VDI instances. need to be able to do things much simpler? So how does the overall Lifecycle Management fit into this discussion? >> It makes it so much easier. And in the old environment, one, It took a lot of man hours to make change. It was very disruptive, when we did make change, it overburdened, I guess that's the word I'm looking for. It really overburdened our staff to cause disruption to business. That wasn't cost efficient. And then simple things like, I've worked for multi billion dollar companies where we had massive QA environments that replicated production, simply can't afford that at local government. Having this sort of environment lets me do a scaled down QA environment and still get the benefit of rolling out non disruptive change. As I said earlier, it's allowed us to take all of those cycles that we were spending on Lifecycle Management because it's greatly simplified, and move those resources and rescale them in other areas where we can actually have more impact on the business. It's hard to be innovative when 100% of your cycles are just keeping the ship afloat. >> All right, well, nothing better than hearing it straight from the end user, public sector reacting very fast to the COVID-19. And, if you heard him he said, if this is his, before he had run this project, he would not have been able to respond. So I think everybody out there understands, if I didn't actually have access to the latest technology, it would be much harder. All right, I'm looking forward to doing the CrowdChat letting everybody else dig in with questions and get follow up but a little bit more, I believe one more announcement he can and got for us though. Let's roll the final video clip. >> In our latest software release VxRail 4.7.510, We continue to add new automation and self service features. New functionality enables you to schedule and run upgrade health checks in advance of upgrades, to ensure clusters are in a ready state for the next upgrade or patch. This is extremely valuable for customers that have stringent upgrade windows, as they can be assured the clusters will seamlessly upgrade within that window. Of course, running health checks on a regular basis also helps ensure that your clusters are always ready for unscheduled patches and security updates. We are also offering more flexibility and getting all nodes or clusters to a common release level with the ability to reimage nodes or clusters to a specific VxRail version, or down rev one or more nodes that may be shipped at a higher rate than the existing cluster. This enables you to easily choose your validated state when adding new nodes or repurposing nodes in a cluster. To sum up all of our announcements, whether you are accelerating data sets modernization extending HCI to harsh Edge environments, deploying an on-premises Dell Technologies Cloud platform to create a developer ready Kubernetes infrastructure. VxRail is there delivering a turn-key experience that enables you to continuously innovate, realize operational freedom and predictably evolve. VxRail provides an extensive breadth of platform configurations, automation and Lifecycle Management across the integrated hardware and software full stack and consistent hybrid Cloud operations to address the broadest range of traditional and modern applications across Core, Edge and Cloud. I now invite you to engage with us. First, the virtual passport program is an opportunity to have some fun while learning about VxRail new features and functionality and sCore some sweet digital swag while you're at it. Delivered via an augmented reality app. All you need is your device. So go to vxrail.is/passport to get started. And secondly, if you have any questions about anything I talked about or want a deeper conversation, we encourage you to join one of our exclusive VxRail Meet The Experts sessions available for a limited time. First come first served, just go to vxrail.is/expertsession to learn more. >> All right, well, obviously, with everyone being remote, there's different ways we're looking to engage. So we've got the CrowdChat right after this. But Jon, give us a little bit more as to how Dell's making sure to stay in close contact with customers and what you've got for options for them. >> Yeah, absolutely. So as Shannon said, so in lieu of not having done Tech World this year in person, where we could have those great in-person interactions and answer questions, whether it's in the booth or in meeting rooms, we are going to have these Meet The Experts sessions over the next couple weeks, and we're going to put our best and brightest from our technical community and make them accessible to everyone out there. So again, definitely encourage you. We're trying new things here in this virtual environment to ensure that we can still stay in touch, answer questions, be responsive, and really looking forward to, having these conversations over the next couple of weeks. >> All right, well, Jon and Chad, thank you so much. We definitely look forward to the conversation here and continued. If you're here live, definitely go down below and do it if you're watching this on demand. You can see the full transcript of it at crowdchat.net/vxrailrocks. For myself, Shannon on the video, Jon, Chad, Andrew, man in the booth there, thank you so much for watching, and go ahead and join the CrowdChat.
SUMMARY :
Announcer: From the Cube And the way we do things a lot of times, talk to the experts and everything. And as it relates to VDI, So, I really love to hear what both of you and the flexibility of the actual rules and the sort of the efficiencies that Shannon's going to share. the latest enhancements to really the VMware strategy and the fact that now you can build and the line I've used that delivers the full power of VxRail for bringing this to market. and operation of the "And it's going to be massive, and that it isn't the most especially in the VM family line. and all the different hardware software, And he's going to explain what happened the ability to be innovative that that the IT put in and still get the benefit it straight from the end user, for the next upgrade or patch. little bit more as to how to ensure that we can still and go ahead and join the CrowdChat.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Richard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Shannon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andrew | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon Siegal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chad Dunn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chad | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15,000 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
40 G | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netherlands | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tom Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$60 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US Navy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
131 degrees Fahrenheit | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Baghdad | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
113 degrees Fahrenheit | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
vSphere 7.0 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
75-person | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
vSphere | TITLE | 0.99+ |
45 degrees Celsius | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VxRail | TITLE | 0.99+ |
30 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Shanghai | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nvidia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VxRail 7.0 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Amarillo | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
less than 14 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Delta Cloud | TITLE | 0.99+ |
late April | DATE | 0.99+ |
Delta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 inches | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SAP HANA | TITLE | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VxRail E Series | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
a day and a half | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 400 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VxRail: Taking HCI to Extremes
>> Announcer: From the Cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is theCube Conversation. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman. And welcome to this special presentation. We have a launch from Dell Technologies updates from the VxRail family. We're going to do things a little bit different here. We actually have a launch video Shannon Champion, of Dell Technologies. And the way we do things a lot of times, is, analysts get a little preview or when you're watching things. You might have questions on it. So, rather than me just wanting it, or you wanting yourself I actually brought in a couple of Dell Technologies expertS two of our Cube alumni, happy to welcome you back to the program. Jon Siegal, he is the Vice President of Product Marketing, and Chad Dunn, who's the Vice President of Product Management, both of them with Dell Technologies. Gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us. >> Good to see you Stu. >> Great to be here. >> All right, and so what we're going to do is we're going to be rolling the video here. I've got a button I'm going to press, Andrew will stop it here and then we'll kind of dig in a little bit, go into some questions when we're all done. We're actually holding a crowd chat, where you will be able to ask your questions, talk to the experts and everything. And so a little bit different way to do a product announcement. Hope you enjoy it. And with that, it's VxRail. Taking HCI to the extremes is the theme. We'll see what that means and everything. But without any further ado, let's let Shannon take the video away. >> Hello, and welcome. My name is Shannon Champion, and I'm looking forward to taking you through what's new with VxRail. Let's get started. We have a lot to talk about. Our launch covers new announcements addressing use cases across the Core, Edge and Cloud and spans both new hardware platforms and options, as well as the latest in software innovations. So let's jump right in. Before we talk about our announcements, let's talk about where customers are adopting VxRail today. First of all, on behalf of the entire Dell Technologies and VxRail teams, I want to thank each of our over 8000 customers, big and small in virtually every industry, who've chosen VxRail to address a broad range of workloads, deploying nearly 100,000 nodes today. Thank you. Our promise to you is that we will add new functionality, improve serviceability, and support new use cases, so that we deliver the most value to you, whether in the Core, at the Edge or for the Cloud. In the Core, VxRail from day one has been a catalyst to accelerate IT transformation. Many of our customers started here and many will continue to leverage VxRail to simply extend and enhance your VMware environment. Now we can support even more demanding applications such as In-Memory databases, like SAP HANA, and more AI and ML applications, with support for more and more powerful GPUs. At the Edge, video surveillance, which also uses GPUs, by the way, is an example of a popular use case leveraging VxRail alongside external storage. And right now we all know the enhanced role that IT is playing. And as it relates to VDI, VxRail has always been a great option for that. In the Cloud, it's all about Kubernetes, and how Dell Technologies Cloud platform, which is VCF on VxRail can deliver consistent infrastructure for both traditional and Cloud native applications. And we're doing that together with VMware. VxRail is the only jointly engineered HCI system built with VMware for VMware environments, designed to enhance the native VMware experience. This joint engineering with VMware and investments in software innovation together deliver an optimized operational experience at reduced risk for our customers. >> Alright, so Shannon talked a bit about, the important role of IT Of course right now, with the global pandemic going on. It's really, calling in, essential things, putting, platforms to the test. So, I really love to hear what both of you are hearing from customers. Also, VDI, of course, in the early days, it was, HCI-only-does-VDI. Now, we know there are many solutions, but remote work is putting that back front and center. So, Jon, why don't we start with you as the what is (muffled speaking) >> Absolutely. So first of all, Stu, thank you, I want to do a shout out to our VxRail customers around the world. It's really been humbling, inspiring, and just amazing to see The impact of our VxRail customers around the world and what they're having on on human progress here. Just for a few examples, there are genomics companies that we have running VxRail that have rolled out testing at scale. We also have research universities out in the Netherlands, doing the antibody detection. The US Navy has stood up a floating hospital to of course care for those in need. So we are here to help that's been our message to our customers, but it's amazing to see how much they're helping society during this. So just just a pleasure there. But as you mentioned, just to hit on the VDI comments, so to your points too, HCI, VxRail, VDI, that was an initial use case years ago. And it's been great to see how many of our existing VxRail customers have been able to pivot very quickly leveraging VxRail to add and to help bring their remote workforce online and support them with their existing VxRail. Because VxRail is flexible, it is agile, to be able to support those multiple workloads. And in addition to that, we've also rolled out some new VDI bundles to make it simpler for customers more cost effective cater to everything from knowlEdge workers to multimedia workers. You name it, you know from 250, desktops up to 1000. But again, back to your point VxRail, HCI, is well beyond VDI, it crossed the chasm a couple years ago actually. And VDI now is less than a third of the typical workloads, any of our customers out there, it supports now a range of workloads that you heard from Shannon, whether it's video surveillance, whether it's general purpose, all the way to mission critical applications now with SAP HAN. So, this has changed the game for sure. But the range of work loads and the flexibility of the actual rules which really helping our existing customers during this pandemic. >> Yeah, I agree with you, Jon, we've seen customers really embrace HCI for a number of workloads in their environments, from the ones that we sure all knew and loved back in the initial days of HCI. Now, the mission critical things now to Cloud native workloads as well, and the sort of the efficiencies that customers are able to get from HCI. And specifically, VxRail gives them that ability to pivot. When these, shall we say unexpected circumstances arise? And I think that that's informing their their decisions and their opinions on what their IP strategies look like as they move forward. They want that same level of agility, and ability to react quickly with their overall infrastructure. >> Excellent. Now I want to get into the announcements. What I want my team actually, your team gave me access to the CIO from the city of Amarillo, so maybe they can dig up that footage, talk about how fast they pivoted, using VxRail to really spin up things fast. So let's hear from the announcement first and then definitely want to share that that customer story a little bit later. So let's get to the actual news that Shannon's going to share. >> Okay, now what's new? I am pleased to announce a number of exciting updates and new platforms, to further enable IT modernization across Core, Edge and Cloud. I will cover each of these announcements in more detail, demonstrating how only VxRail can offer the breadth of platform configurations, automation, orchestration and Lifecycle Management, across a fully integrated hardware and software full stack with consistent, simplified operations to address the broadest range of traditional and modern applications. I'll start with hybrid Cloud and recap what you may have seen in the Dell Technologies Cloud announcements just a few weeks ago, related to VMware Cloud foundation on VxRail. Then I'll cover two brand new VxRail hardware platforms and additional options. And finally circle back to talk about the latest enhancements to our VxRail HCI system software capabilities for Lifecycle Management. Let's get started with our new Cloud offerings based on VxRail. VxRail is the HCI foundation for Dell Technologies, Cloud Platform, bringing automation and financial models, similar to public Cloud to On-premises environments. VMware recently introduced Cloud foundation for Delta, which is based on vSphere 7.0. As you likely know by now, vSphere 7.0 was definitely an exciting and highly anticipated release. In keeping with our synchronous release commitment, we introduced VxRail 7.0 based on vSphere 7.0 in late April, which was within 30 days of VMware's release. Two key areas that VMware focused on we're embedding containers and Kubernetes into vSphere, unifying them with virtual machines. And the second is improving the work experience for vSphere administrators with vSphere Lifecycle Manager or VLCM. I'll address the second point a bit in terms of how VxRail fits in in a moment for VCF 4 with Tom Xu, based on vSphere 7.0 customers now have access to a hybrid Cloud platform that supports native Kubernetes workloads and management, as well as your traditional VM-based workloads. So containers are now first class citizens of your private Cloud alongside traditional VMs and this is now available with VCF 4.0, on VxRail 7.0. VxRail's tight integration with VMware Cloud foundation delivers a simple and direct path not only to the hybrid Cloud, but also to deliver Kubernetes at Cloud scale with one complete automated platform. The second Cloud announcement is also exciting. Recent VCF for networking advancements have made it easier than ever to get started with hybrid Cloud, because we're now able to offer a more accessible consolidated architecture. And with that Dell Technologies Cloud platform can now be deployed with a four-node configuration, lowering the cost of an entry level hybrid Cloud. This enables customers to start smaller and grow their Cloud deployment over time. VCF and VxRail can now be deployed in two different ways. For small environments, customers can utilize a consolidated architecture which starts with just four nodes. Since the management and workload domains share resources in this architecture, it's ideal for getting started with an entry level Cloud to run general purpose virtualized workloads with a smaller entry point. Both in terms of required infrastructure footprint as well as cost, but still with a Consistent Cloud operating model. For larger environments where dedicated resources and role-based access control to separate different sets of workloads is usually preferred. You can choose to deploy a standard architecture which starts at eight nodes for independent management and workload domains. A standard implementation is ideal for customers running applications that require dedicated workload domains that includes Horizon, VDI, and vSphere with Kubernetes. >> Alright, Jon, there's definitely been a lot of interest in our community around everything that VMware is doing with vSphere 7.0. understand if you wanted to use the Kubernetes piece, it's VCF as that so we've seen the announcements, Dell, partnering in there it helps us connect that story between, really the VMware strategy and how they talk about Cloud and where does VxRail fit in that overall, Delta Cloud story? >> Absolutely. So first of all Stu, the VxRail course is integral to the Delta Cloud strategy. it's been VCF on VxRail equals the Delta Cloud platform. And this is our flagship on prem Cloud offering, that we've been able to enable operational consistency across any Cloud, whether it's On-prem, in the Edge or in the public Cloud. And we've seen the Dell tech Cloud Platform embraced by customers for a couple key reasons. One is it offers the fastest hybrid Cloud deployment in the market. And this is really, thanks to a new subscription offer that we're now offering out there where in less than 14 days, it can be still up and running. And really, the Dell tech Cloud does bring a lot of flexibility in terms of consumption models, overall when it comes to VxRail. Secondly, I would say is fast and easy upgrades. This is what VxRail brings to the table for all workloads, if you will, into especially critical in the Cloud. So the full automation of Lifecycle Management across the hardware and software stack across the VMware software stack, and in the Dell software and hardware supporting that, together, this enables essentially the third thing, which is customers can just relax. They can be rest assured that their infrastructure will be continuously validated, and always be in a continuously validated state. And this is the kind of thing that those three value propositions together really fit well, with any on-prem Cloud. Now you take what Shannon just mentioned, and the fact that now you can build and run modern applications on the same VxRail infrastructure alongside traditional applications. This is a game changer. >> Yeah, I love it. I remember in the early days talking with Dunn about CI, how does that fit in with Cloud discussion and the line I've used the last couple years is, modernize the platform, then you can modernize the application. So as companies are doing their full modernization, then this plays into what you're talking about. All right, we can let Shannon continue, we can get some more before we dig into some more analysis. >> That's good. >> Let's talk about new hardware platforms and updates. that result in literally thousands of potential new configuration options. covering a wide breadth of modern and traditional application needs across a range of the actual use cases. First up, I am incredibly excited to announce a brand new Dell EMC VxRail series, the D series. This is a ruggedized durable platform that delivers the full power of VxRail for workloads at the Edge in challenging environments or for space constrained areas. VxRail D series offers the same compelling benefits as the rest of the VxRail portfolio with simplicity, agility and lifecycle management. But in a lightweight short depth at only 20 inches, it's adorable form factor that's extremely temperature-resilient, shock resistant, and easily portable. It even meets milspec standards. That means you have the full power of lifecycle automation with VxRail HCI system software and 24 by seven single point of support, enabling you to rapidly react to business needs, no matter the location or how harsh the conditions. So whether you're deploying a data center at a mobile command base, running real-time GPS mapping on the go, or implementing video surveillance in remote areas, you can ensure availability, integrity and confidence for every workload with the new VxRail ruggedized D series. >> All right, Chad we would love for you to bring us in a little bit that what customer requirement for bringing this to market. I remember seeing, Dell servers ruggedized, of course, Edge, really important growth to build on what Jon was talking about, Cloud. So, Chad, bring us inside, what was driving this piece of the offering? >> Sure Stu. Yeah, yeah, having been at the hardware platforms that can go out into some of these remote locations is really important. And that's being driven by the fact that customers are looking for compute performance and storage out at some of these Edges or some of the more exotic locations. whether that's manufacturing plants, oil rigs, submarine ships, military applications, places that we've never heard of. But it's also about extending that operational simplicity of the the sort of way that you're managing your data center that has VxRails you're managing your Edges the same way using the same set of tools. You don't need to learn anything else. So operational simplicity is absolutely key here. But in those locations, you can take a product that's designed for a data center where definitely controlling power cooling space and take it some of these places where you get sand blowing or seven to zero temperatures, could be Baghdad or it could be Ketchikan, Alaska. So we built this D series that was able to go to those extreme locations with extreme heat, extreme cold, extreme altitude, but still offer that operational simplicity. Now military is one of those applications for the rugged platform. If you look at the resistance that it has to heat, it operates at a 45 degrees Celsius or 113 degrees Fahrenheit range, but it can do an excursion up to 55 C or 131 degrees Fahrenheit for up to eight hours. It's also resistant to heat sand, dust, vibration, it's very lightweight, short depth, in fact, it's only 20 inches deep. This is a smallest form factor, obviously that we have in the VxRail family. And it's also built to be able to withstand sudden shocks certified to withstand 40 G's of shock and operation of the 15,000 feet of elevation. Pretty high. And this is sort of like wherever skydivers go to when they want the real thrill of skydiving where you actually need oxygen to, to be for that that altitude. They're milspec-certified. So, MIL-STD-810G, which I keep right beside my bed and read every night. And it comes with a VxRail stick hardening package is packaging scripts so that you can auto lock down the rail environment. And we've got a few other certifications that are on the roadmap now for naval shock requirements. EMI and radiation immunity often. >> Yeah, it's funny, I remember when we first launched it was like, "Oh, well everything's going to white boxes. "And it's going to be massive, "no differentiation between everything out there." If you look at what you're offering, if you look at how public Clouds build their things, but I called it a few years or is there's a pure optimization. So you need to scale, you need similarities but you know you need to fit some, very specific requirements, lots of places, so, interesting stuff. Yeah, certifications, always keep your teams busy. Alright, let's get back to Shannon to view on the report. >> We are also introducing three other hardware-based additions. First, a new VxRail E Series model based on where the first time AMD EPYC processors. These single socket 1U nodes, offer dual socket performance with CPU options that scale from eight to 64 Cores, up to a terabyte of memory and multiple storage options making it an ideal platform for desktop VDI analytics and computer aided design. Next, the addition of the latest Nvidia Quadro RTX GPUs brings the most significant advancement in computer graphics in over a decade to professional work flows. Designers and artists across industries can now expand the boundary of what's possible, working with the largest and most complex graphics rendering, deep learning and visual computing workloads. And Intel Optane DC persistent memory is here, and it offers high performance and significantly increased memory capacity with data persistence at an affordable price. Data persistence is a critical feature that maintains data integrity, even when power is lost, enabling quicker recovery and less downtime. With support for Intel obtain DC persistent memory customers can expand in memory intensive workloads and use cases like SAP HANA. Alright, let's finally dig into our HCI system software, which is the Core differentiation for VxRail regardless of your workload or platform choice. Our joining engineering with VMware and investments in VxRail HCI system software innovation together deliver an optimized operational experience at reduced risk for our customers. Under the covers, VxRail offers best in class hardware, married with VMware HCI software, either vSAN or VCF. But what makes us different stems from our investments to integrate the two. Dell Technologies has a dedicated VxRail team of about 400 people to build market sell and support a fully integrated hyper converged system. That team has also developed our unique VxRail HCI system software, which is a suite of integrated software elements that extend VMware native capabilities to deliver seamless, automated operational experience that customers cannot find elsewhere. The key components of VxRail HCI system software shown around the arc here that include the extra manager, full stack lifecycle management, ecosystem connectors, and support. I don't have time to get into all the details of these elements today, but if you're interested in learning more, I encourage you to meet our experts. And I will tell you how to do that in a moment. I touched on the LCM being a key feature to the vSphere 7.0 earlier and I'd like to take the opportunity to expand on that a bit in the context of VxRail Lifecycle Management. The LCM adds valuable automation to the execution of updates for customers, but it doesn't eliminate the manual work still needed to define and package the updates and validate all of the components prior to applying them. With VxRail customers have all of these areas addressed automatically on their behalf, freeing them to put their time into other important functions for their business. Customers tell us that Lifecycle management continues to be a major source of the maintenance effort they put into their infrastructure, and then it tends to lead to overburden IT staff, that it can cause disruptions to the business if not managed effectively, and that it isn't the most efficient economically. Automation of Lifecycle Management and VxRail results in the utmost simplicity from a customer experience perspective, and offers operational freedom from maintaining infrastructure. But as shown here, our customers not only realize greater IT team efficiencies, they have also reduced downtime with fewer unplanned outages, and reduced overall cost of operations. With VxRail HCI system software, intelligent Lifecycle Management upgrades of the fully integrated hardware and software stack are automated, keeping clusters and continuously validated states while minimizing risks and operational costs. How do we ensure Continuously validated states for VxRail. VxRail labs execute an extensive, automated, repeatable process on every firmware and software upgrade and patch to ensure clusters are in continuously validated states of the customers choosing across their VxRail environment. The VxRail labs are constantly testing, analyzing, optimizing, and sequencing all of the components in the upgrade to execute in a single package for the full stack. All the while VxRail is backed by Dell EMC's world class services and support with a single point of contact for both hardware and software. IT productivity skyrockets with single click non disruptive upgrades of the fully integrated hardware and software stack without the need to do extensive research and testing. taking you to the next VxRail version of your choice, while always in a continuously validated state. You can also confidently execute automated VxRail upgrades. No matter what hardware generation or node types are in the cluster. They don't have to all be the same. And upgrades with VxRail are faster and more efficient with leapfrogging simply choose any VxRail version you desire. And be assured you will get there in a validated state while seamlessly bypassing any other release in between. Only VxRail can do that. >> All right, so Chad, the lifecycle management piece that Shannon was just talking about is, not the sexiest, it's often underappreciated. There's not only the years of experience, but the continuous work you're doing, reminds me back the early vSAN deployments versus VxRail jointly developed, jointly tested between Dell and VMware. So bring us inside why, 2020 Lifecycle Management still, a very important piece, especially in the VM family line. >> Yes, Stu, I think it's sexy, but, I'm pretty big nerd. (all laughing) Yeah, this is really always been our bread and butter. And in fact, it gets even more important, the larger the deployments come, when you start to look at data centers full of VxRails and all the different hardware software, firmware combinations that could exist out there. It's really the value that you get out of that VxRail HCI system software that Shannon was talking about and how it's optimized around the VMware use case. Very tightly integrated with each VMware component, of course, and the intelligence of being able to do all the firmware, all of the drivers, all the software all together in tremendous value to our customers. But to deliver that we really need to make a fairly large investment. So as Shannon mentioned, we run about 25,000 hours of testing across Each major release for patches, express patches, that's about 7000 hours for each of those. So, obviously, there's a lot of parallelism. And we're always developing new test scenarios for each release that we need to build in as we as we introduce new functionality. And one of the key things that we're able to do, as Shannon mentioned, is to be able to leapfrog releases and get you to that next validated state. We've got about 100 engineers just working on creating and executing those test cases on a continuous basis and obviously, a huge amount of automation. And we've talked about that investment to execute those tests. That's one worth of $60 million of investment in our lab. In fact, we've got just over 2000 VxRail units in our testbed across the US, Shanghai, China and Cork, Ireland. So a massive amount of testing of each of those components to make sure that they operate together in a validated state. >> Yeah, well, absolutely, it's super important not only for the day one, but the day two deployments. But I think this actually a great place for us to bring in that customer that Dell gave me access to. So we've got the CIO of Amarillo, Texas, he was an existing VxRail customer. And he's going to explain what happened as to how he needed to react really fast to support the work-from-home initiative, as well as we get to hear in his words the value of what Lifecycle Management means. So Andrew, if we could queue up that customer segment, please? >> It's been massive and it's been interesting to see the IT team absorb it. As we mature, I think they embrace the ability to be innovative and to work with our departments. But this instance, really justified why I was driving progress. So fervently why it was so urgent today. Three years ago, the answer would have been no. We wouldn't have been in a place where we could adapt With VxRail in place, in a week we spun up hundreds of instant balls. We spun up a 75-person call center in a day and a half, for our public health. We rolled out multiple applications for public health so they could do remote clinics. It's given us the flexibility to be able to roll out new solutions very quickly and be very adaptive. And it's not only been apparent to my team, but it's really made an impact on the business. And now what I'm seeing is those of my customers that work, a little lagging or a little conservative, or understanding the impact of modernizing the way they do business because it makes them adaptable as well. >> Alright, so great, Richard, you talked a bunch about the the efficiencies that that the IT put in place, how about that, that overall just managed, you talked about how fast you spun up these new VDI instances. need to be able to do things much simpler? So how does the overall Lifecycle Management fit into this discussion? >> It makes it so much easier. And in the old environment, one, It took a lot of man hours to make change. It was very disruptive, when we did make change, it overburdened, I guess that's the word I'm looking for. It really overburdened our staff to cause disruption to business. That wasn't cost efficient. And then simple things like, I've worked for multi billion dollar companies where we had massive QA environments that replicated production, simply can't afford that at local government. Having this sort of environment lets me do a scaled down QA environment and still get the benefit of rolling out non disruptive change. As I said earlier, it's allowed us to take all of those cycles that we were spending on Lifecycle Management because it's greatly simplified, and move those resources and rescale them in other areas where we can actually have more impact on the business. It's hard to be innovative when 100% of your cycles are just keeping the ship afloat. >> All right, well, nothing better than hearing it straight from the end user, public sector reacting very fast to the COVID-19. And, if you heard him he said, if this is his, before he had run this project, he would not have been able to respond. So I think everybody out there understands, if I didn't actually have access to the latest technology, it would be much harder. All right, I'm looking forward to doing the CrowdChat letting everybody else dig in with questions and get follow up but a little bit more, I believe one more announcement he can and got for us though. Let's roll the final video clip. >> In our latest software release VxRail 4.7.510, We continue to add new automation and self service features. New functionality enables you to schedule and run upgrade health checks in advance of upgrades, to ensure clusters are in a ready state for the next upgrade or patch. This is extremely valuable for customers that have stringent upgrade windows, as they can be assured the clusters will seamlessly upgrade within that window. Of course, running health checks on a regular basis also helps ensure that your clusters are always ready for unscheduled patches and security updates. We are also offering more flexibility and getting all nodes or clusters to a common release level with the ability to reimage nodes or clusters to a specific VxRail version, or down rev one or more nodes that may be shipped at a higher rate than the existing cluster. This enables you to easily choose your validated state when adding new nodes or repurposing nodes in a cluster. To sum up all of our announcements, whether you are accelerating data sets modernization extending HCI to harsh Edge environments, deploying an on-premises Dell Technologies Cloud platform to create a developer ready Kubernetes infrastructure. VxRail is there delivering a turn-key experience that enables you to continuously innovate, realize operational freedom and predictably evolve. VxRail provides an extensive breadth of platform configurations, automation and Lifecycle Management across the integrated hardware and software full stack and consistent hybrid Cloud operations to address the broadest range of traditional and modern applications across Core, Edge and Cloud. I now invite you to engage with us. First, the virtual passport program is an opportunity to have some fun while learning about VxRail new features and functionality and sCore some sweet digital swag while you're at it. Delivered via an augmented reality app. All you need is your device. So go to vxrail.is/passport to get started. And secondly, if you have any questions about anything I talked about or want a deeper conversation, we encourage you to join one of our exclusive VxRail Meet The Experts sessions available for a limited time. First come first served, just go to vxrail.is/expertsession to learn more. >> All right, well, obviously, with everyone being remote, there's different ways we're looking to engage. So we've got the CrowdChat right after this. But Jon, give us a little bit more as to how Dell's making sure to stay in close contact with customers and what you've got for options for them. >> Yeah, absolutely. So as Shannon said, so in lieu of not having done Tech World this year in person, where we could have those great in-person interactions and answer questions, whether it's in the booth or in meeting rooms, we are going to have these Meet The Experts sessions over the next couple weeks, and we're going to put our best and brightest from our technical community and make them accessible to everyone out there. So again, definitely encourage you. We're trying new things here in this virtual environment to ensure that we can still stay in touch, answer questions, be responsive, and really looking forward to, having these conversations over the next couple of weeks. >> All right, well, Jon and Chad, thank you so much. We definitely look forward to the conversation here and continued. If you're here live, definitely go down below and do it if you're watching this on demand. You can see the full transcript of it at crowdchat.net/vxrailrocks. For myself, Shannon on the video, Jon, Chad, Andrew, man in the booth there, thank you so much for watching, and go ahead and join the CrowdChat.
SUMMARY :
Announcer: From the Cube And the way we do things a lot of times, talk to the experts and everything. And as it relates to VDI, So, I really love to hear what both of you and the flexibility of the actual rules and the sort of the efficiencies that Shannon's going to share. the latest enhancements to really the VMware strategy and the fact that now you can build and the line I've used that delivers the full power of VxRail for bringing this to market. and operation of the "And it's going to be massive, and that it isn't the most especially in the VM family line. and all the different hardware software, And he's going to explain what happened the ability to be innovative that that the IT put in and still get the benefit it straight from the end user, for the next upgrade or patch. little bit more as to how to ensure that we can still and go ahead and join the CrowdChat.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Richard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Shannon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andrew | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon Siegal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chad Dunn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chad | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15,000 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
40 G | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netherlands | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tom Xu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$60 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US Navy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
131 degrees Fahrenheit | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Baghdad | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
113 degrees Fahrenheit | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
vSphere 7.0 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
75-person | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
vSphere | TITLE | 0.99+ |
45 degrees Celsius | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VxRail | TITLE | 0.99+ |
30 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Shanghai | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nvidia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VxRail 7.0 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Amarillo | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
less than 14 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Delta Cloud | TITLE | 0.99+ |
late April | DATE | 0.99+ |
Delta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 inches | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SAP HANA | TITLE | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VxRail E Series | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
a day and a half | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 400 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
John Maddison, Fortinet | CUBE Conversation, May 2020
from the cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world this is a cube conversation everyone welcome to this cube conversation here in the cubes Palo Alto Studios we're here with the quarantine crew I'm John for your host we've got a great guest John Madison CMO an EVP of products of Fortinet and today more than ever in this changing landscape accelerating faster and faster certainly as this covin 19 crisis has forced business to realize a lot of the at scale problems are at hand and a lot of things are exposed in terms of problems and opportunities you have to take care of one of them security John thanks for coming on cube and looking forward to chatting about your recent event you had this week and also the updates at Florida thanks for joining me yeah it's great to be here John so more than ever the innovation strategies are not just talking points anymore in board meetings or companies there's they actually have to come out of this pandemic and operate through it with real innovation with actionable outcomes they've got to get their house in order you're seeing projects really focusing in on the at scale problems which is essentially keep the network's run and keep the sick the security fabric in place this is critical path stuff but the innovation coming out of it has to be a growth play for companies and this has been a big thing so you guys are in the middle of it we've chatted about all the four to guard stuff and all this you're seeing all the traffic you're seeing all the all the impact this work at home has forced companies to not only deal to new realities but it's exposed some things they need to double down on and things they need to either get rid of or fix fast what's your take on all this yeah you know I think it took a lot of people by surprise and the first thing I would like to do is you know spank our employees our customers and partners for the work they've done in the last six to seven weeks now what was happening was a lot of customers had built their work from home programs around a certain percentage 5% 10% 15% and that's what they scaled it for then all of a sudden you know everybody had to work from home and so you went from maybe a thousand people to 10,000 or 5,000 to 50,000 they had to scale very quickly because this had to be implemented in hours and days not weeks and months luckily our systems are able to gaile very quickly we can scale using a security processing units which offload the CPU and allow a lot of users simultaneously to access through VPN SSL VPN IPSec VPN and then we have an implementation at home ranging from a very simple Microsoft Wyant all the way to our clients all the way to even off Buda gate firewalls at home so we really did work very hard to make sure that our customers could maintain their business proposition during these times you know I want to get those work at home and I think it's a little big Sdn story and you guys have been on for a long time I mean we've talked with your you and your folks many times around st Wynn and what it means to to have that in place but this work at home those numbers are off the charts strange and this is disruption this was an unforeseen disruption it's not like a hurricane or flood this is real and we've also talked with you guys and your team around the endpoint you know the edge of the network that's the explosion of the billions of edges this is just an industry kind of inside baseball conversation and then also the immersion of the lifestyle we now live in so you have a world where it was inside baseball for this industry now every company and everyone's feeling it this is a huge issue I'm at home I got to protect myself I got data I gotta have a VPN I mean this is a reality that just wasn't seen I mean what do you guys are what are you guys doing in this area well I think it changes that this long-term architect and so you know the past we talked about there being millions of edges and people go how many billions of edges and what's happened is if you're working from home that's an edge and so the long term architecture means that companies need to take care of where their network edges are now the SEM at home they had them at the branch office they have them at the end of prize and the data center in the cloud then we need to decide know where to apply the security is it at the endpoint is it at the edges is the data center or bout an S T one is absolutely essential because every edge you'll have whether that were home now whether it be in your data center or eCampus on the cloud needs that st-1 technology and make sure you can guide the applications in a secure manner what's interesting is I actually deployed st-1 in my home here I've got two ISP connections one week I'm casting off with AT&T now that may be overkill right now for most people about putting st-1 in their homes but I think long-term homes are gonna be part of the enterprise network it's just another eight take a minute to explain the SD win I would call it the this is a mill especially this is not your grandfather's st win I mean it's changed st when is the internet I mean basically at home what does that mean if users don't know care what the products are at the end of the day they're working at home so kind of SD win has taken on a new broader scope if you will it's not just the classic SD win or is it can you take us through I mean and this is a category that's becoming much broader what's your what's your nails is there yeah again I'm not saying that you know consumers are gonna be putting SD wine in the homes right now but if I'm an executive and I rely on my communication out there are lots of meetings during the day work from home I want it to be as reliable as possible so if my one is pee goes down and I can't get on the internet that's an issue if I have to ISPs I have much higher availability but more importantly us you and I can guide the applications where I want when they want I can make sure you know my normal home traffic goes off certain direction the certain on a VLAN and segmentation policy whereas my war can be completely set out so again I you know I think SDRAM technology is important for the home long term is important for the branch for the enterprise and the data center and Earls St ones built into all up all our forty gates have sp1 you just switch it on we think it's a four essential technology going forward to drive that cloud on-ramp real quick follow-up on that for the folks in the enterprise I see the enterprise will make it easier for their customers their users who are at home so it feels consumer II invisible if you will I think that's the short-term what's what are what are you seeing your customers and prospective customers thinking when they come back or as they operate now in this new reality when they say you know what we really miss forecasted this now they have to get back to business what are they gonna do do they do more sta on I mean what's the architecture how does that get done what's the conversation like you know as this evolved for the next it's gonna slowly open up it still it's going to be a new reality for at least 12 months what's the conversation with the customer right now when it comes to going in and taking care of this so it doesn't happen again yeah what I'm doing actually actually what I'm doing a lot of virtual ABC's obviously we usually have 200 our customers that come to our corporate quarters or executive briefings and I'm doing actually more virtually and a lot of the opening conversations is they don't think they're gonna go completely Hunter's under percent back to where they were there's always going to be now a fraction of work-from-home people they may move around some of their physical location so as I said the ST when is that piece on the edge whether it be your home ranch campus or data centers gonna be there to guide the applications guide the users and devices to the right applications of wherever they may be as it could be in the cloud of communion data center it could be anywhere and then the key conversation thereafter for customers long-term architecture wise is where do I apply my security stack and the security spat consists of basic things like antivirus all right yes more detection capabilities even even response to Isis given that stack how much do I put in the edge how much do I put in my endpoint how much do I put my branch how much I put in my campus data center and cloud and then how do I maintain a policy a single policy across all of those and then now and again maybe I have to move that stack cross so that's going to be the key long term architecture question for enterprises as they move to a slightly different composition of workforce in different locations is hey I've got to make sure every edge that I have I identify and I secure when SP ran and then how do I apply the security stack cross all the diff tell great insight thanks for sharing that I want to get your take on now speaking of working at home you're also the CMO as well as the EVP of products which is a unique job because you can talk about any think when the cube we love it you had an event accelerate 2020 the folks watching go to the hashtag on Twitter hashtag accelerate 20 that's the hash tag you'll see a lot of the the pictures of the slides and some commentary I was laying down some tweets all the analysts were as well what are some of the highlights for you is a great presentation by the CEO you gave a talk and there's a lot of breakouts you had to do a digital event because you couldn't hold the physical event so you kind of had a shelter-in-place kind of and how did it go and what are some of the highlights yeah on the one side I was a bit sad you know we had or what we call accelerates arrange for this year in Barcelona and New York Mexico and San Jose we had to cancel war for them and I'm very quickly spin up a digital event a virtual event and you know we end up there's some initial targets around you know you know each of our physical events we get between two and three thousand and so we're thinking you know if we got to ten thousand this would be great we actually ended up with thirty thirty-two thousand or something like that registered and actually the percentage that showed off was even higher so we had over 20,000 people actually come online and go through our keynotes we built it so you go through the keynotes then you can go off to the painting what we call the breakouts for more detail we did verticals oh it did more technology sessions and so it's great and you know we tried our best to answer the questions online because these things are on demand we had three we had one for the u.s. one premiere and won't write back and so there was times but to get that sort of exposure to me is amazing twenty thousand people on there listening and it connects into another subject which is education and fun yet for some time as invested I would say you know my CEO says but I'll invest a bit more in education versus the marketing advertising budget now go okay okay that's that hey we'll work on that but education for us we announced a few weeks ago that education is now training is free for customers for everybody and we'd also been you know leading the way by providing free training for our partners now it's completely free for everybody we have something called the network security expert which goes from one to eight one and two of that are actually open to the public right now and if I go to the end of last year we had about two to three thousand people maybe a week come on and do the training obviously majority doing the NSC one courses you get further through to eight it's more technical last week we had over eighty thousand people we just think about those numbers incredible because people you know having more time let's do the training and finding is as they're doing this training going up the stack more quickly and they're able to implement their tools more quickly so training for us is just exploded off the map and I and there's a new reality of all the unemployment and also people are at home and there's a lot of job about the skill gap before in another cube conversation it's it's more apparent than ever and why not make it free give people some hope give them some tools to be successful there's demand yes and it's not you know it's not just them you know IT professionals are Ennis e1 is a foundational course and you'll see kids and students and universities doing it and so Ben Mars granddad's dad's doing it so we we're getting all sorts of comments and social media about the training you know our foundation great stuff has a great we'll put a plug on that when should we get that amplified for its really good stuff I got to ask you about the event one of the things I really like about the presentation was from your CEO and you gave one as well was the clarity around the vision of security and a couple of things that were notable to me was the confluence of the collision between networking and security and at the intersection of those two forces you have an accelerated integrated policy dynamic to me this is the heart of DevOps of what used to be in cloud being kind of applied to security you have data you got all kinds of new things emerging new patterns new signals that's security so you got to be you got to be fast you got to identify things so you guys are in this business that's one force and the other one was the billions of edges and this idea that there's no perimeter so it's everything's immersive so illustrate some points of validation on that from your standpoint is that how you guys are seeing it unfold in the future is that happening now can you give us a feeling for whether where we are and that those those kind of paradigms yeah good point so I think it's been happening it's happening now has been happening the future you know if you look at networking and our CEO Enzi talked about this and that networking hasn't really cheer outing and switching we go back to 2000 we had 100 mega under megabit now you have formed a gigabit but the basic function we haven't really changed that much securities different we've gone from a firewall and we add VPN then we at next-gen firewall then we had SSL inspection now we've added sd1 and so this collisions kind of an equal in that you know networking's sped ahead and firewalling is stayed behind because it's just got too many applications on that so the basic principle premise of the company of putting net is to build and bring that together so it's best of all accelerate the basic security network security functions so you can consolidate multiple functions on one system and then bring networking and security together a really good example of security where or nexium firewall where you can accelerate and so our security processing units and my analogy simple analogy is GPUs inside games where their GPU offloads CPU to allow rendering to happen very quick it's the same for us RSP use way of a network SPU and we have a Content SPU which all flows the CPU to allow a security and networking do it be accelerated work now coming to your second point about the perimeter I I'm not quite sure whether the perimeters disappear and the reason I say that is customer still goes they have firewalls on the front of the networks they have endpoint protection they have protection in the cloud so it's not that the perimeters disappeared it's just but much larger and so now the perimeters sitting across all your infrastructure your endpoints your in factories you got IOT devices you've got workloads in different powered and that means you need to look very carefully at those and give visibility initially and then apply the control that control maybe it's a ten-point security it may be SD mine at the edge it may be a compliance template in the cloud but you need visibility of all those edges which have been created with the perimeters reading across the image it's interesting you bring up a good point we always have kind of debates over beers on this on this topic you know the old model was mote you know get the castle and the gate but here the perimeter of the edge if you believe there's an edge and I do believe you find it perfectly the edge is a perimeter it's an endpoint right so it's a door into the internet so are the network so is the perimeter just an end adorn there's more doors right so or service yeah just think about it the castle would did multiple doors is the back everyone's the door there's this dozle someday and you have to define those H's and have visibility of them and that's why things like network access control know for you know zero trust network access is really important making sure you kind of look at the edge inside your way and so your data center and then it's like you powd what workloads are spinning off and what's the configuration and what's there what's from a data perspective right your recommendation and I'm a customer looking at my network I got compute I got edge devices and users I realized there's a billions of edges on my network now and the realities hit me I wasn't really being proactive on investing what do I do what's the PlayBook for me as I start to rethink that and what do I put into place how do I get going now I got to rethink it I now recognize I got full validation I got to manage this I got to do something what's your recommendation to me if I'm a customer the key to me is and I've had this conversation now for the last five years and it's getting louder and louder and that is I suppose I spend a lot of money on point solution point but even end point may have five point products on there and so they're getting to the conclusion it's just too hard to manage I can't find all the right people I get so many alerts from so many security systems I can't work out what's going on and the conversation now is how do I deploy a platform we call it the security fabric now I don't deploy that fabric across my network I'm not saying you should go from 30 vendors to one vendor that would be nice of course but I what I'm saying as you go from 30 vendors down to maybe five or six platform the platform's perform multiple functions it could be they're out there you attach a platform a designer platform just birth protector or a particular organization or part of the network and so the platform allows you then to build automation and the automation allows you to see things more quickly and react to things more quickly and do things without manual intervention the platform approach it's absolutely starting to resonate yes you've still got very very large customers who put everything into segments of a C's Exedra book most customers now moving towards a yeah I think you know as you see and again back to that collision with the end of the intersection we have integrated policies if you're gonna do any integration which is the data problem so we talk about all the time to a lot of different tools can create silos and there's a use case for that but also creates problematic situations I mean a platform gives you a much more robust capability to be adaptive to be real time to program and automate yeah it's it's it's an issue if you've got 30 vendors and just be honest it's also an issue in the industry so I mean networking the story kind of worked out how to work together you can use the same different vendor switches and routers and they roughly work together with cybersecurity they've all been deal you know built totally separately not to even work and that's why you've got these multiple layers you've got a product the security problem then this got its own analytics engine and manager then you've got a manager of managers and an analyzer of analyzers and the sim system and then a saw I mean just goes on it makes it so complex for people and that's why I think they look into something a bit more simplified but most importantly the platform must be friendly from a consumption model you must be able to do an appliance where you need to do virtual machine SAS cloud native container whatever it may be because that network has changed in those ages as those edges move you've got them to have a platform that adaptable to the consumption model require you know I had a great cartridge with Phil Quaid you see your seaso over there and we were chatting around you know this idea of I won't say customization but there's no one turnkey monolithic application it seems to these platforms tend to be enabling where the seaso trend is to have teams building ok and and and almost a customized but building software to automate to solve their use case for their outcome so enabling that is a trend we're seeing so I think you guys are on the right track there any comment on your take on this enabling platform is that something that you guys are seeing that CSIS is looking at more in-house development more use case focus because they have the data they got real-time they need to be building on a platform not told what they could do yeah I think you've always had this this network team trying to build things fast and open and the security team trying to post things down and make it more secure you know it becomes even more problematic if you kind of go to the cloud where you've got pockets a developer's kind of thing do things in the DevOps way really as fast as possible and sometimes the controls are not put in place in fact no the big as I said the biggest issue for the cloud is not so much you know malware it it's more about miss configuration that's why you're seeing the big breaches and that's more of a customer thing to do and so I think what the seaso is trying to do is make sure they apply the controls appropriately and again their job has become much harder now we've got all the multitude of endpoints that they didn't have before they've got now there when that's not just the closed MPLS network is old off different types of broadband 5 G's coming towards the end of this year next year as well the data centers may have decreased a bit but they've still got datacenter capacity and they're probably got 5 or 6 hours and 20 different SAS applications that put a deal with and they've got to deal with developers in there so it's a harder job for them and they need to melt or add those tools but come back to that single point of management great stuff John Madison CMO EVP great insight there it's almost a master class right there you laid it all out on what's going on a final question any change is what any other news updates on the four net front I know you guys got some answer I didn't see the breakouts of the session I had something else going on I think I've been walking dog and do some other things but you know being at home and to take care of things what's new what's what's out that people might have missed that's coming out of for today you're telling me you didn't have 60 hour a breakout on dedicated I don't think yeah we've you know we've have a lot going on you know we have a big R&D team here in North America and Canada and with a lot of products coming out this time of the year we bring out our 40 OS network operating system with 6.4 over 300 new features inside there including new orchestration systems for sp1 and then also we actually launched on network processor seven and the board gate already 200 F powered by four network processor sevens it's some system out there and provide over 800 gigs of fire or capacities but in bill V explain acceleration they can do things like elephant flows huge flows of data so there's always there's always new products coming out of 14 it sure those are the two big ones for this quarter you guys certainly are great interviews to talk to great a lot of expertise there final final question you know everyone every company's got their culture Moore's laws cadence of Moore's laws Intel faster cheaper smaller what's the for Annette culture if you had to kind of boil it down what's it you guys are always pushing great products out there all high quality I'll see security you got to be buttoned up and have good ops and controls but you still need to push the envelope and have stadia what's the culture if you had to kind of boil the culture down for Porter net what would it be that's always an interesting question and so the company's been going since 2000 okay the founders are still there NZ's CEO and Michael Z's the CTO and I think that one of the philosophies is that listen to the customer very closely because you can get distracted by shiny objects all over the place I want to go and do this oh yeah let's build this what about this and in the end the customer and and what they want may get lost and so we listen very closely we use you know we have a very high content of technology people who can translate the customer use case into what we should build and so I think that's the culture we have and maintain that so we're very close to our customers we've been building very quickly for them make sure it works it needs tweaking then we'll look at it again a very very customer driven always great to hear from the founders you guys had a great event accelerate 20 that's the hashtag some great highlights on Twitter some commentary there and of course go to Ford a net site to check out the replays Sean man so thanks for taking the time to share your insights here on the cube conversation I really appreciate it thank you okay it's cube concert here in Palo Alto we're bringing you all the interviews during this time we have our quarantine crew the cube is virtual we'll do whatever it takes to get the interviews out there and get the stories out there and the people behind the tech making it happen I'm John Fourier thanks for watching [Music]
SUMMARY :
of the lifestyle we now live in so you
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John Fourier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Maddison | PERSON | 0.99+ |
5 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AT&T | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 vendors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
May 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
30 vendors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
200 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Jose | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Z | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
thirty thirty-two thousand | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
6 hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ten thousand | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
200 F | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
60 hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Madison | PERSON | 0.99+ |
twenty thousand people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 20,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
50,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fortinet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one vendor | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sean | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ben Mars | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five point | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.98+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Phil Quaid | PERSON | 0.98+ |
40 OS | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
millions of edges | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two forces | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three thousand people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
six platform | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over eighty thousand people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
15% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.97+ |
a week | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three thousand | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
New York Mexico | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
over 800 gigs | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.96+ |
one week | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
ten-point | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
billions of edges | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
eCampus | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
5% | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
end of this year next year | DATE | 0.95+ |
end of last year | DATE | 0.94+ |
this year | DATE | 0.93+ |
two ISP | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
6.4 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Ford | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
DevOps | TITLE | 0.92+ |
300 new features | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
forty | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
st Wynn | LOCATION | 0.91+ |
CSIS | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
single policy | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
one system | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
one force | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Palo Alto Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
PlayBook | TITLE | 0.87+ |
14 | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Annette | PERSON | 0.86+ |
Noel Kenehan, Ericsson | Micron Insight 2019
>>Live from San Francisco. It's the cube covering my groin insight 2019 brought to you by micron. >>We're back at pier 27 in San Francisco. This is the cube, the leader in live tech coverage and we're covering micron insight 2019 I'm Dave Vellante with my cohost David Floyd and this event is kind of interesting. David, it basically intersperses cube interviews with big tent discussions, thought leadership, we've heard from automotive, healthcare and and 5g discussions and no Han is here. He's the vice president and CTO of the emerging business at Erickson. And you were just on a panel. Welcome to the cube. Thanks. Great to be here. You were talking about five G, we're going to talk about five G. so first of all, talking about the emerging business at Ericsson, >>your whole group, you know, so Ericsson, we, you know, 99 a lot of our business today has done what operators emerging business group, we're sort of looking at the intersection of industry, cloud computing, our traditional mobile network operator customers, and how do we, how do we put those together and look for new either products or business models. And really create something new for customers. >>So we tell him when he's talking about five G, everybody gets all excited. Certainly the technology community is excited about it. There's a whole value chain and an ecosystem that's that's pumping right along. The carriers are adopting and the users are just waiting. So what should we know about? >>So I, you know, I think there's a couple of different things. One is from a consumer perspective, you're definitely looking at faster, you know, better. All of the things we've got from the other GS at older things. You know, today, you know, faster downloads of movies. I think what we're, and I'm, I'm in the tech business, not in the prediction business, you know. So I think what we've learned from previous technologies is we almost don't know what the new applications are. We're trying to make the platform as easy as possible for developers to utilize what the network actually has to offer. So I think that's a big part of what we're trying to do. The other part is enhancing what you have today as a consumer is massive, but also industries is a huge pull on 5g. So we talked about industry four. Dot. Zero and really transforming industries and cutting the cables in production lines, allowing monitoring of systems that never happened before. >>A lot of use cases that can be out there. So a, I have a younger son of 22 and I look at my a bill every month. Yeah, I do have him downloading 10 times more data. It doesn't fill me with uh, duty or just the excise to carriers. I mean while we've seen with every, every end. And of course that was the question how much of a down, yeah, how much low is the price going to be on this baffled breeze you go to invest an awful lot. Absolutely. So I mean we're going to see it tens, 10 orders of magnitude cheaper. So even as it is now with 4g, we're seeing a lot of the unlimited plans coming available and so on. I think we're just going to see more of that. And then the question, actually a big question for five G is what will you pay for? >>You know, if we talk about age compute and low latency, if you're a gamer and I can give you X milliseconds of latency versus you know, a two X milliseconds, how much would you pay for that? So I think what we know at the moment is people will pay for that. We don't know exactly how much, and that's where you need the ecosystem and you need to get stuff out there. And actually some of the economic impact is fuzzy. But in thinking past, there's no prologue. But if you think about the other GS as they sort of were adopted, what can we learn from those? And how do you think five G will be different in terms of its adoption and economic impact? Let's say if you look at adoption, I mean just a number of contracts. We have the number of deployments we have globally, just off the charts in terms of where we are with 4g Korea launched and a few months ago, just just before the summer, within two months they had a million 5g subscribers with smart phones in their eyes and two months later they added a second million subscribers. >>I mean for a market to go from zero to that in, in that period of time with smartphones, if we go back to 4g, all of that was with dongles and sort of hotspots on routers, you know, so to jump directly to smartphones, huge adoption, it's going to happen fast. Well what do you, what are the sequence, what's the sequence of events that have to occur for adoption to really take off? >> So obviously you need to build out the networks and the operators are doing that are pretty high speed. You need to have the devices ready and all the devices. Now it's not like you have a 5g only device. It's obviously capable of all the four G things. And then it's better when you have 5g. So the devices are going to come and take and fast. So all your new devices, most of the high end devices have 5g capability already in there. >>Um, and then the networks just getting built out more and more. And then of course the application developers actually understanding how can I take advantage of those new capabilities? And then you'll start to see, okay, wow, you know, I didn't, this wasn't possible before. It's not just a faster download. It's really, there's just new experiences happening >> from a development standpoint. How much access do they have to the technology? Do they have to wait until this is all built out? Obviously not, but, but, but what's the status of sort of the devs? So we're, we're trying to, and we're working with a lot of the ecosystem. We have, we call it the D 15 studio in our Santa Clara office. We're bringing developers in there and really trying to understand, because you know, we talk Telekom as well. So we want to expose things. We want to understand, do you know what variable, if we say quality of service, what does that mean for you? You know, how do you translate that? So, and we're working with, you know, the cloud players where to developers live to some extent to bring in that ecosystem and understand how it all plays together. So >>ahead. Yup. Um, so if really, if you're looking at it longterm, obviously it's going to happen, but the experience is as I go around the States, is that you've got all these different four G three GS edges still in a very, very patchy a level of it. Is this going to be different? Is this going to actually go into different places because there's a big investment that has to be made, a lot of things very close together. Yes, yes. That seems to be a recipe for everything being or right in the cities. But as soon as you go outside the urban areas, it's going to be very patchy. How does that compare, for example, with Elon Musk's idea of a doing stuff from the sky? >>Well, everything comes down to economics. So you know, it's, it's obviously you're going to have denser deployments in the cities, then you are in the countryside and so on. One of the big advantages would 5g is am, and not to get too deep into the technical part, but you can use all the spectrum that's available. And spectrum is super important as we get, you know, when we have lower frequency spectrum, you can cover a hundred miles Wade, one base station as you get to the millimeter wave, which is you get super high bandwidth, then you're add hundreds of meters. Yeah. And so obviously one is more suitable for a rural environment, the other is more suitable for. So for an urban environment, so obviously having those working together in one technology allows you to deploy everything and get the benefits in a much broader area than we had for any of the previous. >>There's choice there in terms of how you deploy or, or leverage the spectrum. So you're saying that the higher performance end of the spectrum, it's gonna require a greater density of other components. And absolutely. When people talk about oil, there's going to be a lot more distributed, you know, pieces of the five G network that has to get built out. So who does that? Who's putting those pieces of the value chain in? So different players, obviously the mobile network operators, the 18 Ts and Verizons of the world are doing a lot of the heavy lifting and know what our support to actually put the, the radios and the towers in place. And then there's an edge compute piece as well, which is different players are putting in that. Um, so, so a lot of that infrastructure has been done. I think one thing that we've been pushing quite a lot, all our install base of radios is um, 5g upgradable via software. >>So that means that a lot of the already installed, uh, radios and infrastructure, you're just softer upgrade, you know, an hour later it's now 5g ready. So I think that's a big piece of basin. Back to your question of how quickly and and can reach all those areas, are there any specific commercial blockers that you see, um, that you're thinking through? I am I, I think the, just understanding some of the more challenging when you look at, if you're deploying edge compute and you have to invest billions and really getting that far out to the edge, I think there's some questions still there. Like I said, how much would you pay for 20 milliseconds versus 15 milliseconds. And that might sound like a lot, but that's a lot of extra infrastructure you would need to put out. So I think that's still being worked true. >>And obviously some of that will happen quicker in a downtown San Francisco than it will in a, you know, middle of Nevada plays well and the others that you've mentioned before, it's unclear what new applications are going to emerge here. And so it's almost like build it and they will come and then we'll figure it out and then we'll figure out how to charge for it. Like you say the gamers, how much will they pay for it? Yeah, so those are some of the uncertainties but they'll shake themselves out. So absolutely. I was a pretty smart about doing. What about micron and the role of memory players and storage players? How will this affect them? Eight say a huge opportunity when you ah, yeah, I mean invest no and Bardy hats. >> Yeah, I think it's a, when you look at the number of devices and, okay, what's the device? >>The devices are smartphone. Well the devices now your car, it's every IOT device and down to your toaster and all the crazy stuff people are talking about too. I mean to every industrial application tool that age, computers. So you're distributing now a lot of different compute memory storage across different parts of the network. So I mean they talked earlier in the panel about phones having terabytes of data. You know, it's in, it's just unimaginable. The amount of data storage. Remember you're going to need in a vehicle, you know, they're looking at terabytes per hour of data and then how much of that should they shift off the vehicle? How much did it keep there? So huge opportunity. >> Well, I'd be willing to pay for, um, some memory in my appliances. They tell me when they're going to break. I just got a new dishwasher and I can program it with my, my remote. I don't want to program. I just want to know that on Thanksgiving morning it was that it works. But in a week before it's going to break, I want to know so I can deal with vending and maintenance. That's a big use case. Can't wait until that happens. The last question, so >>I was going to be, I was following up on that last point you were making. Um, uh, so again, this cost of everything, this, this value that you're going to get out of it. Um, it seems to me that, um, that this is gonna take a long time to push out. Um, and, and before it actually down. And people will actually know whether they can pay for this. And then one thing in particular is there's a lot of resistance in, in the, in the States anyway, to all of these devices being put very, very close, you know, to the, to, to it for example, putting all the devices down, download a row for example, that, that, that seems to be very expensive and, and going to get a lot of reaction from consumers is, is that not the case? >>So I actually, we're not seeing it that much. I mean if you look across the globe, um, China obviously is a slightly unique situation. Massive deployments already happening there. Like I said, Southeast Asia, South Korea being among the, you know, the forefront, big deployments already there. And we're seeing big pull from industries already and the operators here in U S are announcing new cities, you know, every month practically. So they are really full on into this. And to some extent it's, it's really just, there's a capacity need to have the spectrum. They need to make the investments and they're, they're doing it as we speak. >>So I think it depends on me. Why was it a meeting the other day in Boston with a lot of city officials and folks that worked for the mayor's office? They're envisioning Boston, you know, for the next 50 years, smart cities and five G was like, if you did a word cloud 5g was that the number one topic? You know, we talked earlier about sports stadiums. You can see that being, you know, use cases going to be these >>hotspots where it's of very, very high >>of the city in this case in Boston's case are they're going to invest, right? And they're gonna think that's going to be a differentiator for cities. >>You have this amazing infrastructure, you know, five G infrastructure that allows you to take advantage of that, be it just from, they talked about traffic congestion and what the city can do and then what the businesses and the consumers can do in that area that that can end up being a differentiator for innovation companies going there and so on. >>Right. All right. We're going to go before they blow us out. No, thanks very much for coming to the queue very much. All right, great. To have you on. I keep it right there, buddy. We'll be back with our next guest after this short break. You're watching the cube live from micron insight 2019 from San Francisco right back.
SUMMARY :
my groin insight 2019 brought to you by micron. And you were just on a panel. And really create something new for customers. So what should we know about? So I, you know, I think there's a couple of different things. the price going to be on this baffled breeze you go to invest an awful lot. X milliseconds of latency versus you know, a two X milliseconds, dongles and sort of hotspots on routers, you know, So the devices are going to come and take and fast. And then of course the application developers So, and we're working with, you know, the cloud players where to developers But as soon as you go outside the urban areas, So you know, it's, it's obviously you're going to have denser deployments in the When people talk about oil, there's going to be a lot more distributed, you know, And that might sound like a lot, but that's a lot of extra infrastructure you would you know, middle of Nevada plays well and the others that you've mentioned before, it's unclear what new applications I mean to every industrial application tool that age, computers. I just got a new dishwasher and I can program it with my, very close, you know, to the, to, to it for example, putting all the devices down, and the operators here in U S are announcing new cities, you know, They're envisioning Boston, you know, for the next 50 years, of the city in this case in Boston's case are they're going to invest, right? You have this amazing infrastructure, you know, five G infrastructure that allows you to take To have you on.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Noel Kenehan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Floyd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
15 milliseconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nevada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Erickson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
hundreds of meters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
22 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 milliseconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Elon Musk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
U S | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two months later | DATE | 0.98+ |
second million subscribers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Telekom | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
pier 27 | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
billions | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
an hour later | DATE | 0.97+ |
Southeast Asia | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Han | PERSON | 0.96+ |
five G | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
two months | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
D 15 studio | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
one base station | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Eight | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
hundred miles | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Bardy | PERSON | 0.92+ |
G three GS edges | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.92+ |
one technology | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
few months ago | DATE | 0.91+ |
micron insight | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
5g | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.83+ |
4g Korea | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
5g | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Micron Insight | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
10 orders | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
next 50 years | DATE | 0.79+ |
a week | DATE | 0.78+ |
Ts | OTHER | 0.77+ |
Thanksgiving morning | DATE | 0.76+ |
4g | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
Wade | LOCATION | 0.76+ |
micron | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
tens, | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
two X milliseconds | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
a million | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
5g subscribers | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
South Korea | LOCATION | 0.67+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
four | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.62+ |
18 | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
wave | EVENT | 0.61+ |
5g | OTHER | 0.59+ |
99 | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
G | QUANTITY | 0.57+ |
4g | OTHER | 0.54+ |
GS | ORGANIZATION | 0.53+ |
Zero | QUANTITY | 0.52+ |
G | OTHER | 0.52+ |
five G | TITLE | 0.49+ |
five | ORGANIZATION | 0.39+ |
five | TITLE | 0.34+ |
5g | TITLE | 0.29+ |
ucture | ORGANIZATION | 0.24+ |
Chris McReynolds, CenturyLink | VMworld 2019
>> live from San Francisco, celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum, World 2019 brought to you by IBM Wear and its ecosystem partners. >> And welcome back here, San Francisco Moscow Centre, North John Walls along with John Troyer. We're live here on the Cuban Veum World 2019 and right now we're joined by Christmas. Reynolds, who's a product in court product management and Clyde on data service, is for Centurylink. It's good to see you, sir. Good to be here. Thank you. And And he's gonna tell us today why Milliseconds matter, right? You are. >> That is the goal. Your >> your subject of ah, coming presentation. Just about 45 minutes or so. But we'll get to that a little bit. First off, let's just paint the picture of centurylink your presence here quite obvious. But you know what your portfolio includes? There what you're up to, and maybe starting to hint a little bit about why milliseconds matter to you. >> Makes it so. Where a technology company, global in nature. A lot of our roots started with fiber connectivity. Basic networking service is I. P Service is. But over the years we've become far more of a nightie service company. So there was an acquisition of Savvas a long time ago that brought a lot of those capabilities to our company. And we've made more fold in acquisitions that have also bolster those capabilities. We have invested heavily in Security Service's recently and about two weeks ago we had an announcement that said, We're investing heavily an edge compute getting workloads closer to end users. And that's really where milliseconds matters. You want the performance of those applications to consumers or machinery or whatever it may be toe work effectively and work well. And sometimes that requires that those workloads air in close proximity to the end users. >> Would you bring up ej compute? We were just having this discussion before we started, John asked of you. Okay, What? How do you define the because of there A lot of different slices of that, right? Different interpretations, different definitions. So with that being said, how do you define and or at least in your mind, how do you separate edge or what's true edge? Yeah, >> good questions. I think he was John question, not mine. I chuckled time, so because there is no perfect answer. Uh, the broadest definition I've seen is that you have core, and you can think eight of us Azure. You can think where the big core cloud nodes are that are pretty central, maybe 50 milliseconds away from the end users. There's two intermediate edges, if you will, and this is where there are varying opinions. To me, there's really only one if you're within five milliseconds of where your end users are, I consider that to be a market edge. Some people say there's a closer edge that's in within a millisecond of the end users, but I just I personally have not seen the use cases come out yet that require that low of a late unsee that don't actually reside where the end users are so >> going. Well, that's, um, so that's, um, modules at a at a warehouse or ah, manufacturing facility. Is that what? Is that what you consider like an edge? Uh, media marketed? >> Yeah, in >> theirs. It's interesting if you have 10 manufacturing plants in a geographic area, or maybe a better example is if you're a logistics company and you have sorting and distribution centers, you have multiple of those in an area that can all use the same compute as long as it's within five milliseconds, you can do the sorting lines and keep the machinery working. You can get routed into the rate vehicles for distribution. That's a good market edge. When you get all the way to that, the deep edge or on premise they think of an autonomous vehicle is a good example. There are certain things you're not gonna want to transmit and make driving decisions that don't reside on that vehicle. You don't want to crash into anyone. You need almost instantaneous decisions. And that would be the edge that intermediate one millisecond that sits between the two of those. I think it pushes one direction or the other. >> So Chris, here in the emerald 2019 obviously a lot of talking about cloud, but very specifics. This year. We have a lot of specifics around what Veum, where is doing Hybrid Cloud Israel and of course, hybrid cloud implies the network. And so one of the latest announcement from Centurylink is that you're providing via more cloud on AWS you're managing. You are able to help manage provide that as a managed service. I know you already do. Manage service is where you managing stuff in your data centers. But you could, I guess you can also manage workloads on prim and talk a little bit about that portfolio and how adding Veum VMC on AWS few more cloud nebulas adds to that. And then maybe we'll slide into the networking peace and how important that is. >> So we have AH, tool called Cloud Application Manager that has been built over the past handful of years that allows customers to deploy workloads to AWS toe azure and now to be emcee on AWS as well as private cloud environment. So maybe customers want to host those workloads on premise. Maybe it's regulatory compliance or whatever the reason may be. So we have a lot of experience of helping customers deploy those workloads, and then a lot of customers come to us and want to manage. I want us to manage the life cycle of those workloads, those air, the core capabilities. I think the reason that VMC on AWS is so compelling to customers is a lot of customers may not want to deal with the hardware refresh cycles that they do when it's their own private cloud environment or their own hardware stack. This gives them the opportunity to migrate those workloads and a relatively seamless fashion into an environment that is sitting in Maur of, ah, public cloud type model where it's it's Op X versus the Catholics in the headache. >> Go ahead. John was good, just in terms of so and so. Part of why you would work with Centurylink is you are experienced manage service provider. But also you have ah lot of the networking set up to do that efficiently, right? So maybe you talk about some of the workload is that you see going up there and some of the tools and, uh, performance folks can expect, >> Yeah, that's near the core part of my products that so near and dear to me for sure. We've developed a lot of capabilities over the last year and 1/2 around dynamic networking. So if you have your existing VM wear environment in your own data center, or maybe it's a private cloud that's managed by century link, we now have the ability for customers to go in and create net new connections, private network connections that have better Leighton see have better through putting performance between those environments and AWS or, in this case, VMC on AWS. And it allows customers to do a couple of things if they have their own environment and they're happy with it today. But it's not scaling, and they need to add more capacity. They could do that in the hybrid fashion in VMC on eight of us. If they're done with their existing environment hardware stack and they just want a forklift and move that into VMC on eight of us, they can create a big, large connection, push a ton of data over a few weeks, shut it down, and our building models and hourly billing models such that we're only charging them for as long as it's necessary. This gives them flexibility to manage where their workloads air sitting between those two locations as they see fit over time. >> So you're talking about all these new flexibilities new capabilities, much more agile systems being, I guess, interconnected with each other, right? But whether it's hybrid or whether it's multi cloud, whatever the case is, >> how you how to get >> everybody or everything that talk to each other in a way that works and provides, You know, the addresses, the Leighton see challenge, because to me, I'm again outside looking in. That's Ah, that's a big hurdle. As new capabilities get developed, new possibilities exists, but we gotta make it fast way, and we have to make sure they're they're speaking the same language. >> Yeah, it's a great question, and it is very challenging, and it is not all automated today as much as we would like. We have great integration to deploy workloads between environments. We've spent a ton of time from a networking standpoint of integrating with different cloud providers, and they each have their loan little nuances and to make it common between all of them takes a lot of time and effort. Where a lot of our focus is going in the next 12 months is how do you take those application, migration and management capabilities we have in one tool set? How do you marry that? With all of the dynamic networking capabilities and standardization across the cloud providers, we've done so the now it's not only are you moving network workloads, you're also creating the right underlying network to support those workloads in that multi cloud fashion well to capabilities we have. We just need to marry him up a little more clearly. >> I mean, what are you saying out there in the market with your customers? Multi Cloud Bright is perhaps another overused word like EJ. Are you seeing multi cloud portfolios? Are you seeing applications? Talk, actually use have data in one place, and and the and the computer and another. And obviously network becomes increasingly important if that's a reality today. But is that is that real, or is that still science fiction? >> It's becoming more riel so that there are a lot of customers. My pain, A lot of enterprises really bet big on one cloud provider because you have to build up the competency of capabilities inside your own shop and you become really good with working in Azure. Eight of us or Google or of'em were on the hunt. BP BMC Oh, the companies that are doing true multi cloud and using multiple cloud providers. Well, our companies that probably reside around here, so I won't say any of these specifically or doing this mutt. Companies like uber companies like Spotify companies that are born in the cloud that started with those core competencies will take the best of multiple cloud providers. So maybe the Big Data Analytics sitting in Google is most intriguing to them. But they love the tale of the storage cost. Price points on eight of us, and they love this. Ask spit in azure. They'll piece together components since they built it in a containerized fashion. And they take the best of what each cloud has to offer and into your point. The cloud providers air coming to centurylink and saying We need a better way to stitch together all of these different cloud environments because people, the cutting edge developers are pushing us in that direction. Now >> what about the the application network relationship? Um, changing is, you know, you see a shift there of some kind of as, uh, we're talking about, obviously a lot of new opportunities, a lot of developments, and so does that alter the dynamics of that relationship in any way >> It does, and it's the same conversations I just mentioned. Actually, that's driving it. I think today it is network engineers and network infrastructure. People reacting to applications not performing well are reacting to a software developers requested toe add this Google region or that VM wear on on AWS region over time. What's gonna happen, I believe, is their service mesh orchestration capabilities like SDO is a good example is the one Google is pushing hard and it would it allows people to do is from a rules driven perspective. I want my application to have these Leighton see requirements and you can't find me a network solution that is any worse than that. Or if you're seeing packet loss greater than 80% I want you to add more capacity to the network. It won't be humans the network engineers doing that. It's going to be application saying here are my criteria for me to work well, networks Let me see all the options I have out there now. I'm gonna go pick the best one and change it if I need you to make make myself work the way I need to. As an application. >> I love that that I've never connected Is Theo down as as an at, sir, as an APP service layer down to the network. Thank you. I just have a new I got a new thought. Eureka another reason >> why milliseconds matter. That's right. Hey, Chris. Thanks for the time. We appreciate that. I know this is a very busy time for you on. You do have a speaking engagements. We're gonna cut you loose for that. But thanks for spending time with us. And good luck. It centurylink appreciate it. Enjoyed it. Looking forward, Thio. More success. Back with more for Vimal. World 2019 after this short break right here on the Q.
SUMMARY :
brought to you by IBM Wear and its ecosystem partners. We're live here on the Cuban Veum World 2019 and right now we're joined by Christmas. That is the goal. But you know what your portfolio includes? But over the years we've become far more of a nightie service company. how do you define and or at least in your mind, how do you separate edge or what's true Uh, the broadest definition I've seen is that you have core, Is that what you consider like an edge? that intermediate one millisecond that sits between the two of those. And so one of the latest announcement from Centurylink is that you're providing that allows customers to deploy workloads to AWS toe azure and But also you have ah lot of the networking set up to do that efficiently, right? Yeah, that's near the core part of my products that so near and dear to me for sure. everybody or everything that talk to each other in a way Where a lot of our focus is going in the next 12 months is how do you take I mean, what are you saying out there in the market with your customers? So maybe the Big Data Analytics sitting in Google is most intriguing to I'm gonna go pick the best one and change it if I need you to make make myself work the way I need to. I love that that I've never connected Is Theo down as as an at, I know this is a very busy time for you on.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CenturyLink | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Reynolds | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Centurylink | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
50 milliseconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Spotify | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
10 manufacturing plants | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
centurylink | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one millisecond | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
This year | DATE | 0.99+ |
John Troyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Savvas | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Christmas | EVENT | 0.99+ |
two locations | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two intermediate edges | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one direction | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
greater than 80% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each cloud | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
Leighton | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
five milliseconds | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one tool | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
I. P Service | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Eureka | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Chris McReynolds | PERSON | 0.95+ |
about two weeks ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one cloud provider | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
North John Walls | LOCATION | 0.93+ |
San Francisco Moscow Centre | LOCATION | 0.91+ |
about 45 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Vimal | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Cuban Veum World 2019 | EVENT | 0.89+ |
Veum | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
five milliseconds | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Clyde | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Security Service | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Israel | LOCATION | 0.84+ |
BP BMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
Catholics | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
VMworld 2019 | EVENT | 0.84+ |
next 12 months | DATE | 0.83+ |
a millisecond | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
time ago | DATE | 0.75+ |
data | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.69+ |
Cloud Application Manager | TITLE | 0.67+ |
1/2 | DATE | 0.66+ |
VMC | TITLE | 0.62+ |
weeks | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
World 2019 | EVENT | 0.6+ |
SDO | TITLE | 0.59+ |
ton | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
Arturo Suarez, Canonical & Eric Sarault, Kontron | OpenStack Summit 2018
>> Narrator: Live from Vancouver, Canada it's theCUBE covering OpenStack Summit North America 2018. Brought to you by Red Hat, the OpenStack Foundation, and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back to theCUBE. I'm Stu Miniman here with my cohost here John Troyer. And we're at the OpenStack Summit 2018, here in Vancouver. One of the key topics we've been discussing, actually for a few years but under new branding, and it's really matured a bit is Edge Computing. So, we're really happy to welcome to the program two first time guests. We have Arturo Suarez, who's a program director with Canonical. We also have first time Kontron employee on, Eric Sarault, who's a product manager of software and services with, I believe Montreal based, is the headquarters. >> That's correct. >> Stu: So, thank you for allowing all of us to come up to Canada and have some fun. >> It's a pleasure. >> But we were all working during Victoria Day, right? >> Yeah. >> All right. Arturo, we know Canonical. So, we're going to talk about where you fit in. But, Eric, let's start with Kontron. I've got a little bit of background with them. I worked in really kind of the TelCo space back in the 90s. But for people that don't know Kontron maybe give us some background. So, basically, the entity here today is representing the communications business unit. So, what we do on that front is mostly TelCo's service providers. We also have strong customer base in the media vertical. But right now the OpenStack, what we're focusing on, is really on the Edge, mixed messages as well. So, we're really getting about delivering the true story about Edge because everybody has their own version of Edge. Everybody has their own little precisions about it. But down the road, it's making sure that we align everyone towards the same messaging so that we deliver a unified solution so that everybody understands what it is. >> Yeah. So, my filter on this has been Edge depends who you are. If you're a telecommunications vendor, when we've talked about the Cohen, it's the Edge of where they sit. If I'm an enterprise, it's the Edge is more like the IOT devices and sometimes there's an aggregation box in between. So, there's somewhere between two and four Edges out there. It's like cloud. We spent a bunch of years discussing it and then we just put the term to the side and go things. When you're talking Edge at Kontron, what does that mean? You actually have devices. >> We do. >> So, who's your customer? What does the Edge look like? >> So, we do have customers on that front. Right now we're working with some big names out there. Basically delivering solutions for 12 inch depth racks at the bottom of radio towers or near cell sites. And ultimately working our way up closer to what would look like, what I like to call a "closet" data center, if you will. Where we also have a platform with multiple systems that's able to be hosted in the environment. So, that's really about not only having one piece of the equation but really being able to get closer to the data center. >> All right. And Arturo, help bring us in because we know Canonical's a software company. What's the Edge mean to your customers and where does Canonical fit? >> So, Canonical, we take pride of being an ubiquitous platform, right? So, it doesn't matter where the Edge, or what the Edge is, right? There is an Ubuntu platform. There is an Ubuntu operating system for every single domain of compute, going from the very end of the Edge. That device that sits on your house or that drone that is flying around. And you need to do some application businesses, or to post on application businesses with, all the way to the core rank. Our OpenStack story starts at the core. But it's interesting as it goes farther from that core, how the density, it's an important factor in how you do things, so. We are able, with Kontron, to provide an operating system and tooling to tackle several of those compute domains that are part of the cloud where real estate is really expensive, right. >> Eric, so you all are a systems developer? Is that a fair two-word phrase? It's hardware and software? >> Basically, we do our original design. >> Okay. I know where I am. >> Manufacturing. >> So, I'm two steps away from hardware. So, I think of those as all systems. But you build things? >> Eric: Correct. >> And you work with software. I think for folks that have been a little more abstract, you tend to think, "Well, in those towers, there must be some bespoke chips and some other stuff but nothing very sophisticated." At this point we're running, or that your customers are running, full OpenStack installations on your system hardware. >> Eric: Correct. >> That's in there and it's rugged and it's upgradable. Can you talk a little bit about the business impact, of that sort of thing, as you go out and work with your customers? >> Certainly. So, one of the challenges that we saw there was really that, from a hardware perspective, people didn't really think about making sure that, once the box is shipped, how do you get the software on it, right. Typically, it's a push and forget approach. And this is where we saw a big gap, that it doesn't make any sense for folks to figure that on their own. A lot of those people out there are actually application developers. They don't have the networking background. They don't have a hardware engineering background. And the last thing they want to be doing is spending weeks, if not months, figuring out how to deploy OpenStack, or Kubernetes, or other solutions out there. So, that's where we leverage Canonical's tools, including MAAS and Juju, to really deploy that easily, at scale, and automated. Along with packaging some documentation, some proper steps on how to deploy the environment quickly in a few hours instead of just sitting there scratching your head and trying to figure it out, right. Because that's the last thing they want. The minute they have the box in their hand they already want to consume the resources and get up and running, so. That's really the mission we want to tackle that you're not going to see from most hardware vendors out there. >> Yeah, it's interesting. We often talk about scale, and our term, it's a very different scale when you talk about how fast it's deployed. We're not talking about tens or hundreds of thousands of cores for one environment. It's way more distributed. >> Yeah. It's a different type of scale. It's still a scale but the building block is different, right. So, we take the orders of magnitude more of points of presence than there are data centers, right. At that scale, and the farther you go again from the core, the larger the scale it is. But the building block is different. And the ability to play, the price of the compute is different. It goes much higher, right? So, going back again, that ability to condense in OpenStack, the ability to deliver a Kubernetes within that little space, is pretty unique, right? And while we're still figuring out what technology goes on the Edge, we still need to account for, as Eric said, the economics of that Edge play a big, big part of that gain, right. So, there is a scale, it's in the thousands of points of presence, in the hundreds of thousands of points of presence, or different buildings where you can put an Edge cloud, or the use-case are still being defined, but it's scaled on a different building block. >> Well, Arturo, just to clarify for myself, sometimes when you're looking at an OpenStack component diagram, there's a lot of components and I don't know how many nodes I'm going to have to run. And they're all talking to each other. But at the Edge, even though there's powerful hardware there, there's an overhead consideration, right? >> Yes. Absolutely and that's going to be there. And OpenStack might evolve but might not evolve. But this is something we are tackling today, right. That's why I love the fact that Kontron has also a Kubernetes cluster, right. That multi-technology, the real multi-cloud is a multi-technology approach to the Edge, right. There are all the things that we can put in the Edge and the access is set. It's not defined. We need to know exactly how much room you have, how you make the most out of each of your cores or each of the gigs of RAM out there. So, OpenStack obviously is heavy for some parts of the Edge. Kontron, with our help, has pushed that to the minimum Openstack viable that allows you not to roll a track when you need to do something on that location, right. As that is as effective as it can get today. >> Eric, can you help put this in a framework of cloud, in general. When I think of Edge, a lot of it data's going to need to go back to data centers or a public cloud, multiple public cloud providers. How do your customers deal with that? Are you using Kubernetes to help them span between public cloud and the Edge? >> So, it's a mix of both. Right now we're doing some work to see how you can utilize idle processing time, along with Kubernetes scheduling and orchestration capabilities. But also OpenStack really caters to the more traditional SDNN of the use-case out there to run your traditional applications. So, that's two things that we get out of the platform. But it's also understanding how much data do you want to go back to the data center and making sure that most of the processing is as close as possible. That goes along with 5G, of course. You literally don't have the time to go back to the data centers. So, it's really about putting those capabilities, whether it's FPGAs, GPUs, and those platform, and really enabling that as close as possible to the Edge, or the end user, should I say. >> Eric, I know you're in the carrier space. Can you talk a little, maybe Kontron in general? And maybe how you, in your career as you go the next decades looking at imbed-able technology everywhere, and what do you all see as the vision of where we're headed? >> Oh, wow. That's a hell of a question. >> That's a big question to throw on you. >> I think it's very interesting to see where things are going. There's a lot of consolidation. And you have all these opensource project that needs to work together. The fact that OpenStack is embracing the reality that Kubernetes is going to be there to drive workloads. And they're not stepping on each others' throat, not even near. So, this is where the collaboration, between what we're seeing from the OpenStack Foundation along with the projects from the Linux Foundation, this is really, really interesting to see this moving forward. Other projects upcoming, like ONAP and Akraino, it's going to be very interesting for the next 24 months, to see what it's going to shape into. >> One of the near things, you mentioned 5G and we've been watching, what's available, how that roll-out's going to go into the various pieces. Is this ecosystem ready for that? Going to take advantage of it? And how soon until it is real for customers? >> The hardware is ready. That's for sure. It's really going to be about making sure if you have a split environment that's based on X86, or a split with ARM, it's going to be about making sure that these environments can interact with each other. The service chaining is probably the most complicated aspect there is to what people want to be doing there. And there's a bit of a tie, rope-pulling, from one side to another still but it's finally starting to put in to play. So, I think that the fact that Akraino, which is going to bring a version of OpenStack within the Linux Foundation, this is going to be really unlocking the capabilities that are out there to deploy the solution. And tying along with that, with hardware that has a single purpose, that's able to cater all the use-cases, and not just think about one vertical. "And then this box does this and this other box does another use-case." I think that's the pitfall that a lot of vendors fallen into. Instead of just, "Okay, for a second think outside the box. How many applications could you fit in this footprint?" And there probably going to be big data and multiple use-cases, that are nowhere near each other. So, don't try to do this very specific platform and just make sure that you're able to cater pretty much everyone. It's probably going to do the job, right, so. >> There's over 40 sessions on Edge Computing here. Why don't we just give both of you the opportunity to give us a closing remarks on the importance of Edge, what you're seeing here at the show, and final takeaways. >> From our side, from the Canonical side again, the Edge is whatever is not core. That really has different domains of compute. There is an Ubuntu for each of one of those domains. As Eric mentioned, this is important because you have a common platform, not only in the hardware perspective or the orchestrating technologies and their needs, which are evolving fast. And we have the ability, because how we are built, to accommodate or to build on all of those technologies. And be able to allow developers to choose what they want to do or how they want to do it. Try and try again, in different types of technologies and finally get to that interesting thing, right. There is that application layer that still needs to be developed to make the best use out of the existing technologies. So, it's going to be interesting to see how applications and the technologies evolve together. And we are in a great position as a common platform to all of those compute domains on all of those technologies from the economical perspective. >> On our side, what we see, it's really about making sure it's a density play. At the Edge, and the closer you go to these more wild environments, it's not data centers with 30 kilowatts per rack. You don't have the luxury of putting in, what I like to call whiteboards, 36 inch servers or open-compute systems. So, we really want to make sure that we're able to cater to that. We do have the products for it along with the technologies that Canonical are bringing in on that front. We're able to easily roll-out multiple types of application for those different use-cases. And, ultimately, it's all going to be about density, power efficiency, and making sure that your time to production with the environment is as short as possible. Because the minute they'll want access to that platform, you need to be ready to roll it out. Otherwise, you're going to be lagging behind. >> Eric and Arturo, thanks so much for coming on the program and giving us all the updates on Edge Computing here. For John Troyer, I'm Stu Miniman. Back with lots more coverage here from OpenStack Summit 2018 in Vancouver. Thanks for watching theCUBE. (exciting music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Red Hat, the OpenStack Foundation, One of the key topics we've been discussing, to come up to Canada and have some fun. So, basically, the entity here today is it's the Edge of where they sit. that's able to be hosted in the environment. What's the Edge mean to your customers that are part of the cloud But you build things? or that your customers are running, and it's rugged and it's upgradable. So, one of the challenges that we saw there when you talk about how fast it's deployed. And the ability to play, and I don't know how many nodes I'm going to have to run. has pushed that to the minimum Openstack viable data's going to need to go back to and really enabling that as close as possible to the Edge, and what do you all see as the vision of where we're headed? That's a hell of a question. the reality that Kubernetes is going to be there how that roll-out's going to go into the various pieces. that are out there to deploy the solution. the opportunity to give us a closing remarks So, it's going to be interesting to see how applications and the closer you go to these more wild environments, coming on the program and giving us all the updates
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Eric Sarault | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Arturo Suarez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
TelCo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Troyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Canonical | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Arturo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vancouver | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
OpenStack Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Kontron | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 inch | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 kilowatts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Montreal | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Linux Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two-word | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ONAP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
OpenStack Summit 2018 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vancouver, Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two steps | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
36 inch | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Akraino | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
90s | DATE | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
OpenStack | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
OpenStack | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Ubuntu | TITLE | 0.97+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one piece | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Victoria Day | EVENT | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
over 40 sessions | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Kontron | PERSON | 0.96+ |
ARM | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
OpenStack Summit North America 2018 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one environment | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
next decades | DATE | 0.92+ |
Haseeb Budhani, Rafay Systems | CUBEConversation, April 2018
(light music) >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman and this is a special CUBE Conversation here in SiliconANGLE Media's, Palo Alto Studio. Happy to bring back to the program Haseeb Budhani who, last time I talked to Haseeb, Haseeb worked at a number of interesting startups, been a Chief Product Officer, had many various roles, and today, is a founder and CEO. So, we always love to have back CUBE alums, especially doing interesting things, getting out there with that entrepreneurial spirit, so, Haseeb, great to see you. Thanks so much for joining us. >> Great to see you and the first time you and I met, the stage was not as nice as this. That was many, many, many years ago. >> You know, we've been growing up a bit, just like the ecosystems around us. You and I talked about things like replication, changing with data and storage and everything else in various roles so, Rafay Systems, tell us a little bit. What was the inspiration? Tell us a little bit about the founding team, the why the company first. >> Sure. As you know, right before Rafay Systems, I started a company called Soha. Soha was acquired by Akamai 18 odd months ago. I think we all, we learn by failing. There was one specific thing we did very poorly at Soha, which was how we ran operations, how we thought about getting closer to our users and so on, that once we left Akamai, so my co-founder from Soha and I are doing this company again together, he was our VP of Attorney there, he's our VP of Attorney here. When we left Akamai after our stint there, we spent time thinking about what kind of applications have, when you kind of think in terms of an application stack, some microservices in an application stack are always going to need to be as close to the end point as possible. So we were trying to figure out who has that problem and how do they solve it. So, here's what we found. Many, many applications have this problem, nobody knows how to solve it well. I mean, if you think Siri, there's an edge that Apple is running for that. If you think eBay, there's transactions happening in region and so on. Or when you think IoT, there are edges being created in the IoT world, and we wanted to come up with a framework or a platform to solve these problems well for all these different application developers. So we came up with the concept that we call the Programmable Edge. The idea is that we want to help our customers run certain microservices, the ones that are latency sensitive, as close to their end points as possible. And an end point could be a car, it could be a phone, it could be a sensor, doesn't matter what it is, but we want to help them get their applications out as quickly as possible. >> Yeah. Before we get into some of the technology, Rafay Systems, Soha Systems, where did the names for these come from? >> Soha is my daughter's name. Rafay is my son's name. We have two kids. I don't know what I'm going to do after this. I need a job. I don't know what I'm going to do after this company. But, actually, our VP Marketing at Soha, he was the one who wanted to use his name. So when we started the previous company, I called it Bubble Wrap, because I thought we were wrapping apps in a bubble, I thought that was really cool. Everybody hated it. (laughs) >> Yeah, there are too many puns on popping the bubble or things like that, it would be challenging. >> I thought it was, I still think it's awesome, but nobody liked it. So, he was looking for a name and we had hired a new agency, they were ready to roll out a new website, we didn't have a name. So, in, like, a four hour window, we had to come up with something. He says, "That's a short enough name "and looks like you own the domain anyway, "let's just use that." Of course, my kids love it. Then once we started the second company, it had to be named after my son. >> Your daughter wasn't a little upset that you sold off the company and now have nothing to do with it? >> It was a pretty healthy outcome so I think she's fine. (both laughing) >> Excellent. Talking about microservices applications around the globe. I was at the Adobe Summit recently and, you're right, it's a very different conversation than, say, ZDNs in the past. But it's, "How many instances do I have? "How do I manage that? "What's their concern?" Networking's always been one of those underlying challenges. Think back to the failed XSPs in the 90s, (Haseeb laughs) and when Cloud started 10 plus years ago, it was like, "Oh, are we going to be able to handle that today?" Think back to Citrix and their NetScaler product is one of those secret sauce things in there that those of us in the networking space really understand it but most people, "Oh, SAS is going to be great "and things will just work anywhere on any device anywhere." But there's some real challenges there. >> Haseeb: Absolutely. >> What's that big gap in the market and are there other companies that are trying to help solve this? >> I used to work in NetScaler a long time ago. I don't know if you brought it up because of that, but I think it's an incredibly amazing product that became the foundation of many things. I think two things are happening in our industry that allow companies like ours to exist, at least from an applications perspective. One is containers, the fact that we are now able to package things not as big, fat VMs, but smaller, essentially, process level things. And then microservices, the fact that we have this notion of loose coupling between services and you can have certain APIs that expose things to each other. And if you at least thematically think about it, if there's a loose coupling it can extend them out so long as I get more value out of doing so. And that, fundamentally, is what we think is an interesting thing happening out there. The fact that there are loose couplings, the fact that applications are no longer monolithic allows us to make better decisions about what needs to run where. The challenge is how do you make that happen? The example I always share with people is, let's say, let's imagine for a second that you have access to 100,000 regions all around the world. You have edges everywhere, 100,000 locations where you can run your code. What do you do next? How do you decide which ones you need? Do you need 5,000? Do you need 80,000? That needs to be solved by the platform. We are at a point now, particularly when it comes to locations, that these are no longer decisions that an Ops Team can make. That has to be driven by the platform and the platform that we are envisioning is going to help our customers, basically, in terms of where the code goes, how they think about performance, et cetera. These are things that will be expressed as a policy to our platform and we help them determine where the location should be and so on. >> Alright. Haseeb, I think many of us lost too many hours fighting in the industry of, what was cloud, What wasn't cloud, various definitions, those ontological discussions, academically they make sense. Heck, when I talk to customers today it's not like, "Well, I'm figuring out my public cloud strategy," or this and that. They have a cloud strategy because there's various pieces in there to connect. Edge is one of those. I haven't heard that people don't like the term, but if I'll talk to seven different companies, Edge means a very different thing to all of them. You and I reconnected actually when we'd both written similar articles that said, "Well, Edge does not kill the public cloud." Peter Levine wrote a very interesting piece with that eye-catching title that was like, "Well, Edge is going to have trillions of devices "and there'll be more data at the Edge than anywhere else." And it's like, okay, yes, yes, yes, but that does not mean that public cloud evaporates tomorrow, right? Nice try, Amazon, good luck on your next business. (laughs) Maybe give us a little bit your definition of Edge, but, more importantly, who are the type of customers that you're talking to and what is the opportunity and challenges of that Edge environment? >> Sure. So let's talk about what Edge means. I think we both agree that the word edge is a misnomer and depends. There are many kinds of edges, if you will. A car for a Tesla, that's an edge, right? Because they are running compute jobs on the car. I use the phrase device edge to describe that thing, the car is a device edge. You're also going to have the car talking to things out there somewhere. If two cars are interacting with each other, you don't want that interaction or the rendezvous point for that interaction being very, very far away, you want to be somewhere close by. I call that the infrastructure edge. Now, infrastructure edge, since you asked, I'm going to go down that rabbit hole, you could be running at the edge of the internet. So think Equanex or Digital or anybody who's got massive pairing presence and so on. So that's the internet edge, as far as infrastructure is concerned. But if you talk to an AT&T, because you said depending on who you talk to their idea is different, in AT&T's mind or Verizon's mind, maybe the base station is the edge, so I call that the wireless edge. Again, infrastructure. So, at a very high level, there is the device edge, there is the infrastructure edge, and then there's a cloud. Applications will span all of these things. It's not one or the other, that doesn't make any sense. Any application will have workloads that are best run in Amazon or, of course, now I think we use Amazon like TiVo, Amazon means public cloud. >> Stu: Like Kleenex. (laughs) >> Like Kleenex. >> Exactly. >> Some things will run in the core, and some things will run in the middle, and then some things will run at the edge. Now in this kind of discussion, I didn't describe another kind of edge which is the IoT edge. Within a factory, or some gas location or some oil and gas facility out there where maybe you don't even have good connectivity back to the internet. They're going to probably have an edge on prem at the factory edge. That too is a necessity. So you have lots of data being generated, they're going to put it in that location. So we should maybe stop thinking in terms of an edge, it just depending on the application that you're targeting, that application's sub-components may need to run in different places, but that makes it so much harder. We couldn't even figure out how to run things in a single region in Amazon, or two, people still have trouble running across availability zones in Amazon. Now we're saying, "Hey, you're going to have four edges, "or five edges, and you're going to have 100 locations," how is this going to work? And that is the challenge. That's, of course, the opportunity as well, because there are applications out there, I talked about the car use case, which seems to be a real use case for many car companies, particularly the ones who are going autonomous with their fleets. They have this challenge. Lots of data being generated and they need to process it as quickly as possible because there's lots of noise on the wire. This data problem, data is gravity, you want to, instead of moving data to a location where there is compute, you want to move compute as close to the data as possible. That's the trend I look for when we're looking for customers. Who has lots of data/traffic being generated at the edge? That could be a sensor company, probably do a number of IoT companies that are pushing data up and it turns out that it's a lot of data or they have compliance challenges, they're going to have PAI come out of a region. So these are some of the use cases we were looking at. These use cases are new use cases, even in older applications, there are needs that can be fulfilled with an edge. Here's an example I tend to use to describe the problem, not that this is a use case. When I talk to OVC and I'm trying to explain to them why an edge matters, at least thematically, I ask the question; if you go to an e-commerce site, how much time do you spend buying versus browsing? What is your answer? >> The buying is a very small piece of it. >> Yeah. >> But it's the most important part. >> 99% of the time is spent looking at read-only stuff. Why do we need to go back to the core if you're not buying? What if the inventory could be pushed to the edge and you can just interact and look at the inventory, and when you make a purchase decision that goes to the core? That's what's possible with the edge. In fact, I believe that some number of years down the line, that's how all applications are going to behave. The things that are read-only, state management, state validation, cookie validation for example, for authentication, these are things that are going to happen at the edge of the internet or wherever the edge happens to be, and then actual purchase decisions or state change decisions will happen in the core. >> Alright. Haseeb, explain to us where in the stack your solution fits. You mentioned everything from the hyper-scale clouds to Equanex out to devices in cars and the like, so where is your layer? Where is your secret sauce? >> So we expect to sit at the internet edge, once the wireless edge is a real thing 5G becomes out there, we expect to sit somewhere there, somewhere between the internet edge. We are, the way we think about this is there are aggregation points, on the internet, in the network, where you have need to put compute so you can make aggregate decisions across multiple devices. That's where we are building our company. In terms of the stack, we are essentially helping our customers run their compute. Think of us as a platform where customers can bring their code, if you will. Because at the end of the day it's computing. Yes, it's about traffic and data but you still need to run compute somewhere, so we are helping our customers run that compute at the internet edge or the wireless edge. >> Okay. Are your customers some of the Telcos, MSPs cloud providers and the enterprise or how does that relationship work? >> The ideal customers for us are SAS companies who are running applications on the internet that generate money. They care about performance. And they will pay money if we can cut their performance by whatever factor it happens to be. Providers, service providers, in our mind, are partners for us. So we're engaged actually with a number of providers out there who are trying to figure out how to, basically, monetize their existing infrastructure investments better. And edge is a new concept that has been introduced to them and they, as you know, a lot of providers already have edge strategies and we're trying to getting involved with them to see how we can bring more SAS companies to engage with service providers. Which is a really hard thing today. >> It sounds like you solve problem for some Fortune 1,000 customers too, though? >> Yes. >> So do they get involved also? >> Yes, look, the best way to build a startup is you come up with a thesis and very quickly go find four or five people who absolutely believe in the same thing, and they work with you. So, we've been fortunate enough to find a few folks who say, "Look, this is a problem we've been thinking "about for a while, "let's partner together to build a better solution." That's been going really well. >> Great. So, the company itself, I believe you just launched a few months ago, so. >> Haseeb: We started a few months ago. >> Where is the product? What's the state of the funding? >> How many people do you have? >> Sure. >> How many customers? >> We raised a seed round in November. Seed rounds have gotten larger as well these days. They're like the ACE from 10 years ago. We are at a point now where we are demonstrating our platform to our early customers and by early summer we expect to have people on the platform. So, things are moving fast, but I think this problem is becoming more and more clear to many people. Sometimes people don't call it edge computing, people have all kinds of phrases for it, but when it comes to helping customers get better performance out of their existing stacks, that is a very promising concept to many people running applications on the internet. So we are approaching it from that perspective. Edge happens to be the way we solve the problem, so I guess we're an edge computing company, but end of the day we're trying to make applications run faster on the internet. >> Okay. Last thing, give us a viewpoint the next year or two out, what do you expect to see in this space and how should we be measuring success for your firm? >> Sure. Things always take longer than we think they will. I never want to forget that lesson I learned many years ago. I think, look, it's still early days for edge computing. I think a lot of companies who have been bruised by the problem, in that they've tried to build up pops, or tried to get their logic as close to their end points as possible, are going to be adopting it sooner than others. I think in terms of broader option where any developers tZero thinking of core plus edge, that's a five year out thing, and we should, I mean, that's just out there somewhere. But there's enough companies out there, there's enough new use cases out there in the next couple of years that allow company like ours to exist. In fact, I am quite confident that there are probably five other smart people, smarter than me doing this already. This is a real problem, it needs to be solved. >> Alright, well, Haseeb Budhani, it's great to catch up. Thank you so much for helping us interact with our community, understand where these emerging trends in Edge and everything that happens. Distributed architecture is absolutely our biggest challenges of our time, and I look forward to seeing where you and your customers go in the future. >> Absolutely. Thank you so much, Stu. Appreciate your time. >> Alright. And thank you for joining us. Of course, check out theCUBE.net for all of the videos. Check out wikibon.com where it is absolutely digging in deep to how edge is impacting architectures. Peter Burris, David Floyer and the team digging in deep to understand that more and always love your feedback so feel free to give us any comments back. I'm Stu Miniman and thank you for watching theCUBE. (light music)
SUMMARY :
Happy to bring back to the program Haseeb Budhani Great to see you and the first time you and I met, just like the ecosystems around us. The idea is that we want to help our customers Before we get into some of the technology, because I thought we were wrapping apps in a bubble, on popping the bubble or things like that, it had to be named after my son. It was a pretty healthy outcome so I think she's fine. "Oh, SAS is going to be great and the platform that we are envisioning I haven't heard that people don't like the term, I call that the infrastructure edge. (laughs) I ask the question; if you go to an e-commerce site, What if the inventory could be pushed to the edge Haseeb, explain to us where in the stack your solution fits. We are, the way we think about this and the enterprise or how does that relationship work? And edge is a new concept that has been introduced to them is you come up with a thesis So, the company itself, I believe you just launched Edge happens to be the way we solve the problem, and how should we be measuring success for your firm? that allow company like ours to exist. and I look forward to seeing where you Thank you so much, Stu. I'm Stu Miniman and thank you for watching theCUBE.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David Floyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Levine | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Soha | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rafay Systems | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Akamai | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Soha Systems | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Siri | TITLE | 0.99+ |
AT&T | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two kids | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
November | DATE | 0.99+ |
5,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Haseeb | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rafay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eBay | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Haseeb Budhani | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 locations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two cars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
April 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
80,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Equanex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kleenex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100,000 regions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Citrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.98+ |
next year | DATE | 0.98+ |
100,000 locations | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Adobe Summit | EVENT | 0.97+ |
five edges | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
10 plus years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
90s | DATE | 0.96+ |
second company | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
early summer | DATE | 0.96+ |
seven different companies | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
trillions of devices | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
TiVo | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
18 odd months ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.92+ |
few months ago | DATE | 0.92+ |
theCUBE.net | OTHER | 0.91+ |
five other smart people | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
wikibon.com | OTHER | 0.89+ |
Wikibon Predictions Webinar with Slides
(upbeat music) >> Hi, welcome to this year's Annual Wikibon Predictions. This is our 2018 version. Last year, we had a very successful webinar describing what we thought was going to happen in 2017 and beyond and we've assembled a team to do the same thing again this year. I'm very excited to be joined by the folks listed here on the screen. My name is Peter Burris. But with me is David Floyer, Jim Kobielus is remote. George Gilbert's here in our Pal Alto studio with me. Neil Raden is remote. David Vellante is here in the studio with me. And Stuart Miniman is back in our Marlboro office. So thank you analysts for attending and we look forward to a great teleconference today. Now what we're going to do over the course of the next 45 minutes or so is we're going to hit about 13 of the 22 predictions that we have for the coming year. So if you have additional questions, I want to reinforce this, if you have additional questions or things that don't get answered, if you're a client, give us a call. Reach out to us. We'll leave you with the contact information at the end of the session. But to start things off we just want to make sure that everybody understands where we're coming from. And let you know who is Wikibon. So Wikibon is a company that starts with the idea of what's important as to research communities. Communities are where the action is. Community is where the change is happening. And community is where the trends are being established. And so we use digital technologies like theCUbE, CrowdChat and others to really ensure that we are surfacing the best ideas that are in a community and making them available to our clients so that they can succeed successfully, they can be more successful in their endeavors. When we do that, our focus has always been on a very simple premise. And that is that we're moving to an era of digital business. For many people, digital business can mean virtually anything. For us it means something very specific. To us, the difference between business and digital business is data. A digital business uses data to differentially create and keep a customer. So borrowing from what Peter Drucker said if the goal of business is to create customers and keep and sustain customers, the goal of digital business is to use data to do that. And that's going to inform an enormous number of conversations and an enormous number of decisions and strategies over the next few years. We specifically believe that all businesses are going to have establish what we regard as the five core digital business capabilities. First, they're going to have to put in place concrete approaches to turning more data into work. It's not enough to just accrete data, to capture data or to move data around. You have to be very purposeful and planful in how you establish the means by which you turn that data into work so that you can create and keep more customers. Secondly, it's absolutely essential that we build kind of the three core technology issues here, technology capabilities of effectively doing a better job of capturing data and IoT and people, or internet of things and people, mobile computing for example, is going to be a crucial feature of that. You have to then once you capture that data, turn it into value. And we think this is the essence of what big data and in many respects AI is going to be all about. And then once you have the possibility, kind of the potential energy of that data in place, then you have to turn it into kinetic energy and generate work in your business through what we call systems of agency. Now, all of this is made possible by this significant transformation that happens to be conterminous with this transition to digital business. And that is the emergence of the cloud. The technology industry has always been defined by the problems it was able to solve, catalyzed by the characteristics of the technology that made it possible to solve them. And cloud is crucial to almost all of the new types of problems that we're going to solve. So these are the five digital business capabilities that we're going to talk about, where we're going to have our predictions. Let's start first and foremost with this notion of turn more data into work. So our first prediction relates to how data governance is likely to change in a global basis. If we believe that we need to turn more data into work well, businesses haven't generally adopted many of the principles associated with those practices. They haven't optimized to do that better. They haven't elevated those concepts within the business as broadly and successfully as they have or as they should. We think that's going to change in part by the emergence of GDPR or the General Data Protection Regulation. It's going to go in full effect in May 2018. A lot has been written about it. A lot has been talked about. But our core issues ultimately are is that the dictates associated with GDPR are going to elevate the conversation on a global basis. And it mandates something that's now called the data protection officer. We're going to talk about that in a second David Vellante. But if is going to have real teeth. So we were talking with one chief privacy officer not too long ago who suggested that had the Equifax breach occurred under the rules of GDPR that the actual finds that would have been levied would have been in excess of 160 billion dollars which is a little bit more than the zero dollars that has been fined thus far. Now we've seen new bills introduced in Congress but ultimately our observation and our conversations with a lot of data chief privacy officers or data protection officers is that in the B2B world, GDPR is going to strongly influence not just our businesses behavior regarding data in Europe but on a global basis. Now that has an enormous implication David Vellante because it certainly suggest this notion of a data protection officer is something now we've got another potential chief here. How do we think that's going to organize itself over the course of the next few years? >> Well thank you Peter. There are a lot of chiefs (laughs) in the house and sometimes it gets confusing as the CIO, there's the CDO and that's either chief digital officer or chief data officer. There's the CSO, could be strategy, sometimes that could be security. There's the CPO, is that privacy or product. As he says, it gets confusing sometimes. On theCUbE we talked to all of these roles so we wanted to try to add some clarity to that. First thing we want to say is that the CIO, the chief information officer, that role is not going away. A lot of people predict that, we think that's nonsense. They will continue to have a critical role. Digital transformations are the priority in organizations. And so the chief digital officer is evolving from more than just a strategy role to much more of an operation role. Generally speaking, these chiefs tend to report in our observation to the chief operating officer, president COO. And we see the chief digital officer as increasing operational responsibility aligning with the COO and getting incremental responsibility that's more operational in nature. So the prediction really is that the chief digital officer is going to emerge as a charismatic leader amongst these chiefs. And by 2022, nearly 50% of organizations will position the chief digital officer in a more prominent role than the CIO, the CISO, the CDO and the CPO. Those will still be critical roles. The CIO will be an enabler. The chief information security officer has a huge role obviously to play especially in terms of making security a teams sport and not just falling on IT's shoulders or the security team's shoulders. The chief data officer who really emerged from a records and data management role in many cases, particularly within regulated industries will still be responsible for that data architecture and data access working very closely with the emerging chief privacy officer and maybe even the chief data protection officer. Those roles will be pretty closely aligned. So again, these roles remain critical but the chief digital officer we see as increasing in prominence. >> Great, thank you very much David. So when we think about these two activities, what we're really describing is over the course of the next few years, we strongly believe that data will be regarded more as an asset within business and we'll see resources devoted to it and we'll see certainly management devoted to it. Now, that leads to the next set of questions as data becomes an asset, the pressure to acquire data becomes that much more acute. We believe strongly that IoT has an enormous implication longer term as a basis for thinking about how data gets acquired. Now, operational technology has been in place for a long time. We're not limiting ourselves just operational technology when we talk about this. We're really talking about the full range of devices that are going to provide and extend information and digital services out to consumers, out to the Edge, out to a number of other places. So let's start here. Over the course of the next few years, the Edge analytics are going to be an increasingly important feature overall of how technology decisions get made, how technology or digital business gets conceived and even ultimately how business gets defined. Now David Floyer's done a significant amount of work in this domain and we've provided that key finding on the right hand side. And what it shows is that if you take a look at an Edge based application, a stylized Edge based application and you presume that all the data moves back to an centralized cloud, you're going to increase your costs dramatically over a three year period. Now that moderates the idea or moderates the need ultimately for providing an approach to bringing greater autonomy, greater intelligence down to the Edge itself and we think that ultimately IoT and Edge analytics become increasingly synonymous. The challenge though is that as we evolve, while this has a pressure to keep more of the data at the Edge, that ultimately a lot of the data exhaust can someday become regarded as valuable data. And so as a consequence of that, there's still a countervailing impression to try to still move all data not at the moment of automation but for modeling and integration purposes, back to some other location. The thing that's going to determine that is going to be rate at which the cost of moving the data around go down. And our expectation is over the next few years when we think about the implications of some of the big cloud suppliers, Amazon, Google, others, that are building out significant networks to facilitate their business services may in fact have a greater impact on the common carriers or as great an impact on the common carriers as they have on any server or other infrastructure company. So our prediction over the next few years is watch what Amazon, watch what Google do as they try to drive costs down inside their networks because that will have an impact how much data moves from the Edge back to the cloud. It won't have an impact necessarily on the need for automation at the Edge because latency doesn't change but it will have a cost impact. Now that leads to a second consideration and the second consideration is ultimately that when we talk about greater autonomy at the Edge we need to think about how that's going to play out. Jim Kobielus. >> Jim: Hey thanks a lot Peter. Yeah, so what we're seeing at Wikibon is that more and more of the AI applications, more of the AI application development involves AI and more and more of the AI involves deployment of those models, deep learning machine learning and so forth to the Edges of the internet of things and people. And much of that AI will be operating autonomously with little or no round-tripping back to the cloud. What that's causing, in fact, we're seeing really about a quarter of the AI development projects (static interference with web-conference) as Edge deployment. What that involves is that more and more of that AI will be, those applications will be bespoke. They'll be one of a kind, or unique or an unprecedented application and what that means is that, you know, there's a lot of different deployment scenarios within which organizations will need to use new forms of learning to be able to ready that data, those AI applications to do their jobs effectively albeit to predictions of real time, guiding of an autonomous vehicle and so forth. Reinforcement learning is the core of what many of these kinds of projects, especially those that involve robotics. So really software is hitting the world and you know the biggest parts are being taken out of the Edge, much of that is AI, much of that autonomous, where there is no need or less need for real time latency in need of adaptive components, AI infused components where as they can learn by doing. From environmental variables, they can adapt their own algorithms to take the right actions. So, they'll have far reaching impacts on application development in 2018. For the developer, the new developer really is a data scientist at heart. They're going to have to tap into a new range of sources of data especially Edge sourced data from the senors on those devices. They're going to need to do commitment training and testing especially reinforcement learning which doesn't involve trained data so much as it involves being able to build an algorithm that can learn to maximum what's called accumulative reward function and if you do the training there adaptly in real time at the Edge and so forth and so on. So really, much of this will be bespoke in the sense that every Edge device increasingly will have its own set of parameters and its own set of objective functions which will need to be optimized. So that's one of the leading edge forces, trends, in development that we see in the coming year. Back to you Peter. >> Excellent Jim, thank you very much. The next question here how are you going to create value from data? So once you've, we've gone through a couple trends and we have multiple others about what's going to happen at the Edge. But as we think about how we're going to create value from data, Neil Raden. >> Neil: You know, the problem is that data science emerged rapidly out of sort of a perfect storm of big data and cloud computing and so forth. And people who had been involved in quantitative methods you know rapidly glommed onto the title because it was, lets face it, it was very glamorous and paid very well. But there weren't really good best practices. So what we have in data science is a pretty wide field of things that are called data science. My opinion is that the true data scientists are people who are scientists and are involved in developing new or improving algorithms as opposed to prepping data and applying models. So the whole field really kind of generated very quickly, in really, just in a few years. To me I called it generation zero which is more like data prep and model management all done manually. And it wasn't really sustainable in most organizations because for obvious reasons. So generation one, then some vendors stepped up with tool kits or benchmarks or whatever for data scientists and made it a little better. And generation two is what we're going to see in 2018, is the need for data scientists to no longer prep data or at least not spend very much time with it. And not to do model management because the software will not only manage the progression of the models but even recommend them and generate them and select the data and so forth. So it's in for a very big change and I think what you're going to see is that the ranks of data scientists are going to sort of bifurcate to old style, let me sit down and write some spaghetti code in R or Java or something and those that use these advanced tool kits to really get the work done. >> That's great Neil and of course, when we start talking about getting the work done, we are becoming increasingly dependent upon tools, aren't we George? But the tool marketplace for data science, for big data, has been somewhat fragmented and fractured. And hasn't necessarily focused on solving the problems of the data scientists. But in many respects focusing the problems that the tools themselves have. What's going to happen in the coming year when we start thinking about Neil's prescription that as the tools improve what's going to happen to the tools. >> Okay so, the big thing that we see supporting what Neil's talking about, what Neil was talking about is partly a symptom of a product issue and a go to market issue where the produce issue was we had a lot of best of breed products that were all designed to fit together. That in the broader big data space, that's the same issue that we faced with more narrowly with ArpiM Hadoop where you know, where we were trying to fit together a bunch of open source packages that had an admin and developer burden. More broadly, what Neil is talking about is sort of a richer end to end tools that handle both everything from the ingest all to the way to the operationalization and feedback of the models. But part of what has to go on here is that with open source, these open source tools the price point and the functional footprints that many of the vendors are supporting right now can't feed an enterprise sales force. Everyone talks with their open source business models about land and expand and inside sales. But the problem is once you want to go to wide deployment in an enterprise, you still need someone negotiating commercial terms at a senior level. You still need the technical people fitting the tools into a broader architecture. And most of the vendors that we have who are open source vendors today, don't have either the product breadth or the deal size to support traditional enterprise software. An account team would typically a million and a half to two million quota every year so we see consolidation and the consolidation again driven by the need for simplicity for the admins and the developers and for business model reasons to support enterprise sales force. >> All right, so what we're going to see happen in the course of the coming year is a lot of specialization and recognition of what is data science, what are the practices, how is it going to work, supported by an increasing quality of tools and a lot of tool vendors are going to be left behind. Now the third kind of notion here for those core technology capabilities is we still have to enact based on data. The good new is that big data is starting to show some returns in part because of some of the things that AI and other technologies are capable of doing. But we have to move beyond just creating the potential for, we have to turn that into work and that's what we mean ultimately by this notion of systems of agency. The idea that data driven applications will increasingly be act on behalf of a brand, on behalf of a company and building those systems out is going to be crucial. It's going to have a whole new set of disciplines and expertise required. So when we think about what's going to be required, it always starts with this notion of AI. A lot of folks are presuming however, that AI is going to be relatively easy to build or relatively easy to put together. We have a different opinion George. What do we think is going to happen as these next few years unfold related to AI adoption in large enterprises? >> Okay so, let's go back to the lessons we learned from sort of the big data, the raw, you know, let's put a data link in place which was sort of the top of everyone's agenda for several years. The expectation was it was going to cure cancer, taste like chocolate and cost a dollar. And uh. (laughing) It didn't quite work out that way. Partly because we had a burden on the administrator again of so many tools that weren't all designed to fit together, even though they were distributed together. And then the data scientists, the guys who had to take all this data that wasn't carefully curated yet. And turn that into advanced analytics and machine learning models. We have many of the same problems now with tool sets that are becoming more integrated but at lower levels. This is partly what Neil Raden was just talking about. What we have to recognize is something that we see all along, I mean since the beginning of (laughs) corporate computing. We have different levels of extraction and you know at the very bottom, when you're dealing with things like Tensorflow or MXNet, that's not for mainstream enterprises. That's for you know, the big sophisticated tech companies who are building new algorithms on those frameworks. There's a level above that where you're using like a spark cluster in the machine learning built into that. That's slightly more accessible but when we talk about mainstream enterprises taking advantage of AI, the low hanging fruit is for them to use the pre-trained models that the public cloud vendors have created with all the consumer data on speech, image recognition, natural language processing. And then some of those capabilities can be further combined into applications like managing a contact center and we'll see more from like Amazon, like recommendation engines, fulfillment optimization, pricing optimization. >> So our expectation ultimately George is that we're going to see a lot of this, a lot of AI adoption happen through existing applications because the vendors that are capable of acquiring a talent, taking or experimenting, creating value, software vendors are going to be where a lot of the talent ends up. So Neil, we have an example of that. Give us an example of what we think is going to happen in 2018 when we start thinking about exploiting AI and applications. >> Neil: I think that it's fairly clear to be the application of what's called advanced analytics and data science and even machine learning. But really, it's rapidly becoming a commonplace in organizations not just at the bottom of the triangle here. But I like the example of SalesForce.com. What they've done with Einstein, is they've made machine learning and I guess you can say, AI applications available to their customer base and why is that a good thing? Because their customer base already has a giant database of clean data that they can use. So you're going to see a huge number of applications being built with Einstein against Salesforce.com data. But there's another thing to consider and that is a long time ago Salesforce.com built connectors to a zillion times of external data. So, if you're a SalesForce.com customer using Einstein, you're going to be able to use those advanced tools without knowing anything about how to train a machine learning model and start to build those things. And I think that they're going to lead the industry in that sense. That's going to push their revenue next year to, I don't know, 11 billion dollars or 12 billion dollars. >> Great, thanks Neil. All right so when we think about further evidence of this and further impacts, we ultimately have to consider some of the challenges associated with how we're going to create application value continually from these tools. And that leads to the idea that one of the cobblers children, it's going to gain or benefit from AI will in fact be the developer organization. Jim, what's our prediction for how auto-programming impacts development? >> Jim: Thank you very much Peter. Yeah, automation, wow. Auto-programming like I said is the epitome of enterprise application development for us going forward. People know it as co-generation but that really understates the control of auto-programming as it's evolving. Within 2018, what we're going to see is that machine learning driven co-generation approach of becoming the forefront of innovation. We're seeing a lot of activity in the industry in which applications use ML to drive the productivity of developers for all kinds of applications. We're also seeing a fair amount of what's called RPA, robotic process automation. And really, how they differ is that ML will deliver or will drive co-generation, from what I call the inside out meaning, creating reams of code that are geared to optimize a particular application scenario. This is RPA which really takes over the outside in approach which is essentially, it's the evolution of screen scraping that it's able to infer the underlined code needed for applications of various sorts from the external artifacts, the screens and from sort of the flow of interactions and clips and so forth for a given application. We're going to see that ML and RPA will compliment each other in the next generation of auto-programming capabilities. And so, you know, really application development tedium is really the enemy of, one of the enemies of productivity (static interference with web-conference). This is a lot of work, very detailed painstaking work. And what they need is to be better, more nuanced and more adaptive auto-programming tools to be able to build the code at the pace that's absolutely necessary for this new environment of cloud computing. So really AI-related technologies can be applied and are being applied to application development productivity challenges of all sorts. AI is fundamental to RPA as well. We're seeing a fair number of the vendors in that stage incorporate ML driven OCR and natural language processing and screen scraping and so forth into their core tools to be able to quickly build up the logic albeit to drive sort of the verbiage outside in automation of fairly complex orchestration scenario. In 2018, we'll see more of these technologies come together. But you know, they're not a silver bullet. 'Cause fundamentally and for organizations that are considering going deeply down into auto-programming they're going to have to factor AI into their overall plans. They need to get knowledgeable about AI. They're going to need to bring more AI specialists into their core development teams to be able to select from the growing range of tools that are out there, RPA and ML driven auto-programming. Overall, really what we're seeing is that the AI, the data scientists, who's been the fundamental developer of AI, they're coming into the core of development tools and skills in organizations. And they're going to be fundamental to this whole trend in 2018 and beyond. If AI gets proven out in auto-programming, these developers will then be able to evangelize the core utility of the this technology, AI. In a variety of other backend but critically important investments that organizations will be making in 2018 and beyond. Especially in IT operations and in management, AI is big in that area as well. Back to you there, Peter. >> Yeah, we'll come to that a little bit later in the presentation Jim, that's a crucial point but the other thing we want to note here regarding ultimately how folks will create value out of these technologies is to consider the simple question of okay, how much will developers need to know about infrastructure? And one of the big things we see happening is this notion of serverless. And here we've called it serverless, developer more. Jim, why don't you take us through why we think serverless is going to have a significant impact on the industry, at least certainly from a developer perspective and developer productivity perspective. >> Jim: Yeah, thanks. Serverless is really having an impact already and has for the last several years now. Now, everybody, many are familiar in the developer world, AWS Lambda which is really the ground breaking public cloud service that incorporates the serverless capabilities which essentially is an extraction layer that enables developers to build stateless code that executes in a cloud environment without having to worry about and to build microservices, we don't have to worry about underlined management of containers and virtual machines and so forth. So in many ways, you know, serverless is a simplification strategy for developers. They don't have to worry about the underlying plumbing. They can worry, they need to worry about the code, of course. What are called Lambda functions or functional methods and so forth. Now functional programming has been around for quite a while but now it's coming to the form in this new era of serverless environment. What we'll see in 2018 is that we're predicting is that more than 50% of lean microservices employees, in the public cloud will be deployed in serverless environments. There's AWS and Microsoft has the Azure function. IMB has their own. Google has their own. There's a variety of private, there's a variety of multiple service cloud code bases for private deployment of serverless environments that we're seeing evolving and beginning to deploy in 2018. They all involve functional programming which really, along, you know, when coupled with serverless clouds, enables greater scale and speed in terms of development. And it's very agile friendly in the sense that you can quickly Github a functionally programmed serverless microservice in a hurry without having to manage state and so forth. It's very DevOps friendly. In the very real sense it's a lot faster than having to build and manage and tune. You know, containers and DM's and so forth. So it can enable a more real time and rapid and iterative development pipeline going forward in cloud computing. And really fundamentally what serverless is doing is it's pushing more of these Lamba functions to the Edge, to the Edges. If you're at an AWS Green event last week or the week before, but you notice AWS is putting a big push on putting Lambda functions at the Edge and devices for the IoT as we're going to see in 2018. Pretty much the entire cloud arena. Everybody will push more of the serverless, functional programming to the Edge devices. It's just a simplification strategy. And that actually is a powerful tool for speeding up some of the development metabolism. >> All right, so Jim let me jump in here and say that we've now introduced the, some of these benefits and really highlighted the role that the cloud is going to play. So, let's turn our attention to this question of cloud optimization. And Stu, I'm going to ask you to start us off by talking about what we mean by true private cloud and ultimately our prediction for private cloud. Do we have, why don't you take us through what we think is going to happen in this world of true private cloud? >> Stuart: Sure Peter, thanks a lot. So when Wikibon, when we launched the true private cloud terminology which was about two weeks ago next week, two years ago next week, it was in some ways coming together of a lot of trends similar to things that you know, George, Neil and James have been talking about. So, it is nothing new to say that we needed to simplify the IT stack. We all know, you know the tried and true discussion of you know, way too much of the budget is spent kind of keeping lights on. What we'd like to say is kind of running the business. If you squint through this beautiful chart that we have on here, a big piece of this is operational staffing is where we need to be able to make a significant change. And what we've been really excited and what led us to this initial market segment and what we're continuing to see good growth on is the move from traditional, really siloed infrastructure to you want to have, you know, infrastructure where it is software based. You want IT to really be able to focus on the application services that they're running. And what our focus for the this for the 2018 is of course it's the central point, it's the data that matters here. The whole reason we've infrastructured this to be able to run applications and one of the things that is a key determiner as to where and what I use is the data and how can I not only store that data but actually gain value from that data. Something we've talked about time and again and that is a major determining factor as to am I building this in a public cloud or am I doing it in you know my core. Is it something that is going to live on the Edge. So that's what we were saying here with the true private cloud is not only are we going to simplify our environment and therefore it's really the operational model that we talked about. So we often say the line, cloud is not a destination. But it's an operational model. So a true private cloud giving me some of the you know, feel and management type of capability that I had had in the public cloud. It's, as I said, not just virtualization. It's much more than that. But how can I start getting services and one of the extensions is true private cloud does not live in isolation. When we have kind of a core public cloud and Edge deployments, I need to think about the operational models. Where data lives, what processing happens need to be as environments, and what data we'll need to move between them and of course there's fundamental laws of physics that we need to consider in that. So, the prediction of course is that we know how much gear and focus has been on the traditional data center. And true private cloud helps that transformation to modernization and the big focus is many of these applications we've been talking about and uses of data sets are starting to come into these true private cloud environments. So, you know, we've had discussions. There's Spark, there's modern databases. Many of these, there's going to be many reasons why they might live in the private cloud environment. And therefore that's something that we're going to see tremendous growth and a lot of focus. And we're seeing a new wave of companies that are focusing on this to deliver solutions that will do more than just a step function for infrastructure or get us outside of our silos. But really helps us deliver on those cloud native applications where we pull in things like what Jim was talking about with serverless and the like. >> All right, so Stu, what that suggests ultimately is that data is going to dictate that everything's not going to end up in the private or in the public cloud or centralized public clouds because of latency costs, data governance and IP protection reasons. And there will be some others. At bare minimum, that means that we're going to have it in most large enterprises as least a couple of clouds. Talk to us about what this impact of multi cloud is going to look like over the course of the next few years. >> Stuart: Yeah, critical point there Peter. Because, right, unfortunately, we don't have one solution. There's nobody that we run into that say, oh, you know, I just do a single you know, one environment. You know it would be great if we only had one application to worry about. But as you've done this lovely diagram here, we all use lots of SaaS and increasingly, you know, Oracle, Microsoft, SalesForce, you know, all pushing everybody to multiple SaaS environments that has major impacts on my security and where my data lives. Public clouds, no doubt is growing at leaps and bounds. And many customers are choosing applications to live in different places. So just as in data centers, I would kind of look at it from an application standpoint and build up what I need. Often, there's you know, Amazon doing phenomenal. But you know, maybe there's things that I'm doing with Azure. Maybe there's things that's I'm doing with Google or others as well as my service providers for locality, for you know, specialized services, that there's reasons why people are doing it. And what customers would love is an operational model that can actually span between those. So we are very early in trying to attack this multi cloud environment. There's everything from licensing to security to you know, just operationally how do I manage those. And a piece of them that we were touching on in this prediction year, is Kubernetes actually can be a key enabler for that cloud native environment. As Jim talked about the serverless, what we'd really like is our developer to be able to focus on building their application and not think as much about the underlined infrastructure whether that be you know, racket servers that I built myself or public cloud infrastructures. So we really want to think more it's at the data and application level. It's SaaS and pass is the model and Kubernetes holds the promise to solve a piece of this puzzle. Now Kubernetes is not by no means a silver bullet for everything that we need. But it absolutely, it is doing very well. Our team was at the Linux, the CNCF show at KubeCon last week and there is you know, broad adoption from over 40 of the leading providers including Amazon is now a piece. Even SalesForce signed up to the CNCF. So Kubernetes is allowing me to be able to manage multi cloud workflows and therefore the prediction we have here Peter is that 50% of developing teams will be building, sustaining multi cloud with Kubernetes as a foundational component of that. >> That's excellent Stu. But when we think about it, the hardware of technology especially because of the opportunities associated with true private cloud, the hardware technologies are also going to evolve. There will be enough money here to sustain that investment. David Floyer, we do see another architecture on the horizon where for certain classes of workloads, we will be able to collapse and replicate many of these things in an economical, practical way on premise. We call that UniGrid, NVME is, over fabric is a crucial feature of UniGrid. >> Absolutely. So, NVMe takes, sorry NVMe over fabric or NVMe-oF takes NVMe which is out there as storage and turns it into a system framework. It's a major change in system architecture. We call this UniGrid. And it's going to be a focus of our research in 2018. Vendors are already out there. This is the fastest movement from early standards into products themselves. You can see on the chart that IMB have come out with NVMe over fabrics with the 900 storage connected to the power. Nine systems. NetApp have the EF750. A lot of other companies are there. Meta-Lox is out there looking for networks, for high speed networks. Acceler has a major part of the storage software. So and it's going to be used in particular with things like AI. So what are the drivers and benefits of this architecture? The key is that data is the bottleneck for application. We've talked about data. The amount of data is key to making applications more effective and higher value. So NVMe and NVMe over fabrics allows data to be accessed in microseconds as opposed to milliseconds. And it allows gigabytes of data per second as opposed to megabytes of data per second. And it also allows thousands of processes to access all of the data in very very low latencies. And that gives us amazing parallelism. So what's is about is disaggregation of storage and network and processes. There are some huge benefits from that. Not least of which is you save about 50% of the processor you get back because you don't have to do storage and networking on it. And you save from stranded storage. You save from stranded processor and networking capabilities. So it's overall, it's going to be cheaper. But more importantly, it makes it a basis for delivering systems of intelligence. And systems of intelligence are bringing together systems of record, the traditional systems, not rewriting them but attaching them to real time analytics, real time AI and being able to blend those two systems together because you've got all of that additional data you can bring to bare on a particular problem. So systems themselves have reached pretty well the limit of human management. So, one of the great benefits of UniGrid is to have a single metadata lab from all of that data, all of those processes. >> Peter: All those infrastructure elements. >> All those infrastructure elements. >> Peter: And application. >> And applications themselves. So what that leads to is a huge potential to improve automation of the data center and the application of AI to operations, operational AI. >> So George, it sounds like it's going to be one of the key potential areas where we'll see AI be practically adopted within business. What do we think is going to happen here as we think about the role that AI is going to play in IT operations management? >> Well if we go back to the analogy with big data that we thought was going to you know, cure cancer, taste like chocolate, cost a dollar, and it turned out that the application, the most wide spread application of big data was to offload ETL from expensive data warehouses. And what we expect is the first widespread application of AI embedded in applications for horizontal use where Neil mentioned SalesForce and the ability to use Einstein as SalesForce data and connected data. Now because the applications we're building are so complex that as Stu mentioned you know, we have this operational model with a true private cloud. It's actually not just the legacy stuff that's sucking up all the admin overhead. It's the complexity of the new applications and the stringency of the SLA's, means that we would have to turn millions of people into admins, the old you know, when the telephone networks started, everyone's going to have to be an operator. The only way we can get past this is if we sort of apply machine learning to IT Ops and application performance management. The key here is that the models can learn how the infrastructure is laid out and how it operates. And it can also learn about how all the application services and middleware works, behaving independently and with each other and how they tie with the infrastructure. The reason that's important is because all of a sudden you can get very high fidelity root cause analysis. In the old management technology, if you had an underlined problem, you'd have a whole sort of storm of alerts, because there was no reliable way to really triangulate on the or triage the root cause. Now, what's critical is if you have high fidelity root cause analysis, you can have really precise recommendations for remediation or automated remediation which is something that people will get comfortable with over time, that's not going to happen right away. But this is critical. And this is also the first large scale application of not just machine learning but machine data and so this topology of collecting widely desperate machine data and then applying models and then reconfiguring the software, it's training wheels for IoT apps where you're going to have it far more distributed and actuating devices instead of software. >> That's great, George. So let me sum up and then we'll take some questions. So very quickly, the action items that we have out of this overall session and again, we have another 15 or so predictions that we didn't get to today. But one is, as we said, digital business is the use of data assets to compete. And so ultimately, this notion is starting to diffuse rapidly. We're seeing it on theCUbE. We're seeing it on the the CrowdChats. We're seeing it in the increase of our customers. Ultimately, we believe that the users need to start preparing for even more business scrutiny over their technology management. For example, something very simple and David Floyer, you and I have talked about this extensively in our weekly action item research meeting, the idea of backing up and restoring a system is no longer in a digital business world. It's not just backing up and restoring a system or an application, we're talking about restoring the entire business. That's going to require greater business scrutiny over technology management. It's going to lead to new organizational structures. New challenges of adopting systems, et cetera. But, ultimately, our observations is that data is going to indicate technology directions across the board whether we talk about how businesses evolve or the roles that technology takes in business or we talk about the key business capability, digital business capabilities, of capturing data, turning it into value and then turning into work. Or whether we talk about how we think about cloud architecture and which organizations of cloud resources we're going to utilize. It all comes back to the role that data's going to play in helping us drive decisions. The last action item we want to put here before we get to the questions is clients, if we don't get to your question right now, contact us. Send us an inquiry. Support@silicongangle.freshdesk.com. And we'll respond to you as fast as we can over the course of the next day, two days, to try to answer your question. All right, David Vellante, you've been collecting some questions here. Why don't we see if we can take a couple of them before we close out. >> Yeah, we got about five or six minutes in the chat room, Jim Kobielus has been awesome helping out and so there's a lot of detailed answer there. The first, there's some questions and comments. The first one was, are there too many chiefs? And I guess, yeah. There's some title inflation. I guess my comment there would be titles are cheap, results aren't. So if you're creating chief X officers just for the, to check a box, you're probably wasting money. So you've got to give them clear roles. But I think each of these chiefs has clear roles to the extent that they are you know empowered. Another comment came up which is we don't want you know, Hadoop spaghetti soup all over again. Well true that. Are we at risk of having Hadoop spaghetti soup as the centricity of big data moves from Hadoop to AI and ML and deep learning? >> Well, my answer is we are at risk of that but that there's customer pressure and vendor economic pressure to start consolidating. And we'll also see, what we didn't see in the ArpiM big data era, with cloud vendors, they're just going to start making it easier to use some of the key services together. That's just natural. >> And I'll speak for Neil on this one too, very quickly, that the idea ultimately is as the discipline starts to mature, we won't have people that probably aren't really capable of doing some of this data science stuff, running around and buying a tool to try to supplement their knowledge and their experience. So, that's going to be another factor that I think ultimately leads to clarity in how we utilize these tools as we move into an AI oriented world. >> Okay, Jim is on mute so if you wouldn't mind unmuting him. There was a question, is ML a more informative way of describing AI? Jim, when you and I were in our Boston studio, I sort of asked a similar question. AI is sort of the uber category. Machine learning is math. Deep learning is a more sophisticated math. You have a detailed answer in the chat. But maybe you can give a brief summary. >> Jim: Sure, sure. I don't want too pedantic here but deep learning is essentially, it's a lot more hierarchical deeper stacks of neural network of layers to be able to infer high level extractions from data, you know face recognitions, sentiment analysis and so forth. Machine learning is the broader phenomenon. That's simply along a different and part various approaches for distilling patterns, correlations and algorithms from the data itself. What we've seen in the last week, five, six tenure, let's say, is that all of the neural network approaches for AI have come to the forefront. And in fact, the core often market place and the state of the art. AI is an ancient paradigm that's older than probably you or me that began and for the longest time was rules based system, expert systems. Those haven't gone away. The new era of AI we see as a combination of both statical approaches as well as rules based approaches, and possibly even orchestration based approaches like graph models or building broader context or AI for a variety of applications especially distributed Edge application. >> Okay, thank you and then another question slash comment, AI like graphics in 1985, we move from a separate category to a core part of all apps. AI infused apps, again, Jim, you have a very detailed answer in the chat room but maybe you can give the summary version. >> Jim: Well quickly now, the most disruptive applications we see across the world, enterprise, consumer and so forth, the advantage involves AI. You know at the heart of its machine learning, that's neural networking. I wouldn't say that every single application is doing AI. But the ones that are really blazing the trail in terms of changing the fabric of our lives very much, most of them have AI at their heart. That will continue as the state of the art of AI continues to advance. So really, one of the things we've been saying in our research at Wikibon `is that the data scientists or those skills and tools are the nucleus of the next generation application developer, really in every sphere of our lives. >> Great, quick comment is we will be sending out these slides to all participants. We'll be posting these slides. So thank you Kip for that question. >> And very importantly Dave, over the course of the next few days, most of our predictions docs will be posted up on Wikibon and we'll do a summary of everything that we've talked about here. >> So now the questions are coming through fast and furious. But let me just try to rapid fire here 'cause we only got about a minute left. True private cloud definition. Just say this, we have a detailed definition that we can share but essentially it's substantially mimicking the public cloud experience on PRIM. The way we like to say it is, bringing the cloud operating model to your data versus trying to force fit your business into the cloud. So we've got detailed definitions there that frankly are evolving. about PaaS, there's a question about PaaS. I think we have a prediction in one of our, you know, appendices predictions but maybe a quick word on PaaS. >> Yeah, very quick word on PaaS is that there's been an enormous amount of effort put on the idea of the PaaS marketplace. Cloud Foundry, others suggested that there would be a PaaS market that would evolve because you want to be able to effectively have mobility and migration and portability for this large cloud application. We're not seeing that happen necessarily but what we are seeing is that developers are increasingly becoming a force in dictating and driving cloud decision making and developers will start biasing their choices to the platforms that demonstrate that they have the best developer experience. So whether we call it PaaS, whether we call it something else. Providing the best developer experience is going to be really important to the future of the cloud market place. >> Okay great and then George, George O, George Gilbert, you'll follow up with George O with that other question we need some clarification on. There's a question, really David, I think it's for you. Will persistent dims emerge first on public clouds? >> Almost certainly. But public clouds are where everything is going first. And when we talked about UniGrid, that's where it's going first. And then, the NVMe over fabrics, that architecture is going to be in public clouds. And it has the same sort of benefits there. And NV dims will again develop pretty rapidly as a part of the NVMe over fabrics. >> Okay, we're out of time. We'll look through the chat and follow up with any other questions. Peter, back to you. >> Great, thanks very much Dave. So once again, we want to thank you everybody here that has participated in the webinar today. I apologize for, I feel like Hans Solo and saying it wasn't my fault. But having said that, none the less, I apologize Neil Raden and everybody who had to deal with us finding and unmuting people but we hope you got a lot out of today's conversation. Look for those additional pieces of research on Wikibon, that pertain to the specific predictions on each of these different things that we're talking about. And by all means, Support@silicongangle.freshdesk.com, if you have an additional question but we will follow up with as many as we can from those significant list that's starting to queue up. So thank you very much. This closes out our webinar. We appreciate your time. We look forward to working with you more in 2018. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
And that is the emergence of the cloud. but the chief digital officer we see how much data moves from the Edge back to the cloud. and more and more of the AI involves deployment and we have multiple others that the ranks of data scientists are going to sort Neil's prescription that as the tools improve And most of the vendors that we have that AI is going to be relatively easy to build the low hanging fruit is for them to use of the talent ends up. of the triangle here. And that leads to the idea the logic albeit to drive sort of the verbiage And one of the big things we see happening is in the sense that you can quickly the role that the cloud is going to play. Is it something that is going to live on the Edge. is that data is going to dictate that and Kubernetes holds the promise to solve the hardware technologies are also going to evolve. of the processor you get back and the application of AI to So George, it sounds like it's going to be one of the key and the stringency of the SLA's, over the course of the next day, two days, to the extent that they are you know empowered. in the ArpiM big data era, with cloud vendors, as the discipline starts to mature, AI is sort of the uber category. and the state of the art. in the chat room but maybe you can give the summary version. at Wikibon `is that the data scientists these slides to all participants. over the course of the next few days, bringing the cloud operating model to your data Providing the best developer experience is going to be with that other question we need some clarification on. that architecture is going to be in public clouds. Peter, back to you. on Wikibon, that pertain to the specific predictions
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David Floyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Neil | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stuart | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jim Kobielus | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Neil Raden | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Wikibon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Stuart Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George Gilbert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Drucker | PERSON | 0.99+ |
May 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
General Data Protection Regulation | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1985 | DATE | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
George O | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Hans Solo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Support@silicongangle.freshdesk.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
12 billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second consideration | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
11 billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nine systems | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fireside Chat with Andy Jassy, AWS CEO, at the AWS Summit SF 2017
>> Announcer: Please welcome Vice President of Worldwide Marketing, Amazon Web Services, Ariel Kelman. (applause) (techno music) >> Good afternoon, everyone. Thank you for coming. I hope you guys are having a great day here. It is my pleasure to introduce to come up on stage here, the CEO of Amazon Web Services, Andy Jassy. (applause) (techno music) >> Okay. Let's get started. I have a bunch of questions here for you, Andy. >> Just like one of our meetings, Ariel. >> Just like one of our meetings. So, I thought I'd start with a little bit of a state of the state on AWS. Can you give us your quick take? >> Yeah, well, first of all, thank you, everyone, for being here. We really appreciate it. We know how busy you guys are. So, hope you're having a good day. You know, the business is growing really quickly. In the last financials, we released, in Q four of '16, AWS is a 14 billion dollar revenue run rate business, growing 47% year over year. We have millions of active customers, and we consider an active customer as a non-Amazon entity that's used the platform in the last 30 days. And it's really a very broad, diverse customer set, in every imaginable size of customer and every imaginable vertical business segment. And I won't repeat all the customers that I know Werner went through earlier in the keynote, but here are just some of the more recent ones that you've seen, you know NELL is moving their their digital and their connected devices, meters, real estate to AWS. McDonalds is re-inventing their digital platform on top of AWS. FINRA is moving all in to AWS, yeah. You see at Reinvent, Workday announced AWS was its preferred cloud provider, and to start building on top of AWS further. Today, in press releases, you saw both Dunkin Donuts and Here, the geo-spatial map company announced they'd chosen AWS as their provider. You know and then I think if you look at our business, we have a really large non-US or global customer base and business that continues to expand very dramatically. And we're also aggressively increasing the number of geographic regions in which we have infrastructure. So last year in 2016, on top of the broad footprint we had, we added Korea, India, and Canada, and the UK. We've announced that we have regions coming, another one in China, in Ningxia, as well as in France, as well as in Sweden. So we're not close to being done expanding geographically. And then of course, we continue to iterate and innovate really quickly on behalf of all of you, of our customers. I mean, just last year alone, we launched what we considered over 1,000 significant services and features. So on average, our customers wake up every day and have three new capabilities they can choose to use or not use, but at their disposal. You've seen it already this year, if you look at Chime, which is our new unified communication service. It makes meetings much easier to conduct, be productive with. You saw Connect, which is our new global call center routing service. If you look even today, you look at Redshift Spectrum, which makes it easy to query all your data, not just locally on disk in your data warehouse but across all of S3, or DAX, which puts a cash in front of DynamoDB, we use the same interface, or all the new features in our machine learning services. We're not close to being done delivering and iterating on your behalf. And I think if you look at that collection of things, it's part of why, as Gartner looks out at the infrastructure space, they estimate the AWS is several times the size business of the next 14 providers combined. It's a pretty significant market segment leadership position. >> You talked a lot about adopts in there, a lot of customers moving to AWS, migrating large numbers of workloads, some going all in on AWS. And with that as kind of backdrop, do you still see a role for hybrid as being something that's important for customers? >> Yeah, it's funny. The quick answer is yes. I think the, you know, if you think about a few years ago, a lot of the rage was this debate about private cloud versus what people call public cloud. And we don't really see that debate very often anymore. I think relatively few companies have had success with private clouds, and most are pretty substantially moving in the direction of building on top of clouds like AWS. But, while you increasingly see more and more companies every month announcing that they're going all in to the cloud, we will see most enterprises operate in some form of hybrid mode for the next number of years. And I think in the early days of AWS and the cloud, I think people got confused about this, where they thought that they had to make this binary decision to either be all in on the public cloud and AWS or not at all. And of course that's not the case. It's not a binary decision. And what we know many of our enterprise customers want is they want to be able to run the data centers that they're not ready to retire yet as seamlessly as they can alongside of AWS. And it's why we've built a lot of the capabilities we've built the last several years. These are things like PPC, which is our virtual private cloud, which allows you to cordon off a portion of our network, deploy resources into it and connect to it through VPN or Direct Connect, which is a private connection between your data centers and our regions or our storage gateway, which is a virtual storage appliance, or Identity Federation, or a whole bunch of capabilities like that. But what we've seen, even though the vast majority of the big hybrid implementations today are built on top of AWS, as more and more of the mainstream enterprises are now at the point where they're really building substantial cloud adoption plans, they've come back to us and they've said, well, you know, actually you guys have made us make kind of a binary decision. And that's because the vast majority of the world is virtualized on top of VMWare. And because VMWare and AWS, prior to a few months ago, had really done nothing to try and make it easy to use the VMWare tools that people have been using for many years seamlessly with AWS, customers were having to make a binary choice. Either they stick with the VMWare tools they've used for a while but have a really tough time integrating with AWS, or they move to AWS and they have to leave behind the VMWare tools they've been using. And it really was the impetus for VMWare and AWS to have a number of deep conversations about it, which led to the announcement we made late last fall of VMWare and AWS, which is going to allow customers who have been using the VMWare tools to manage their infrastructure for a long time to seamlessly be able to run those on top of AWS. And they get to do so as they move workloads back and forth and they evolve their hybrid implementation without having to buy any new hardware, which is a big deal for companies. Very few companies are looking to find ways to buy more hardware these days. And customers have been very excited about this prospect. We've announced that it's going to be ready in the middle of this year. You see companies like Amadeus and Merck and Western Digital and the state of Louisiana, a number of others, we've a very large, private beta and preview happening right now. And people are pretty excited about that prospect. So we will allow customers to run in the mode that they want to run, and I think you'll see a huge transition over the next five to 10 years. >> So in addition to hybrid, another question we get a lot from enterprises around the concept of lock-in and how they should think about their relationship with the vendor and how they should think about whether to spread the workloads across multiple infrastructure providers. How do you think about that? >> Well, it's a question we get a lot. And Oracle has sure made people care about that issue. You know, I think people are very sensitive about being locked in, given the experience that they've had over the last 10 to 15 years. And I think the reality is when you look at the cloud, it really is nothing like being locked into something like Oracle. The APIs look pretty similar between the various providers. We build an open standard, it's like Linux and MySQL and Postgres. All the migration tools that we build allow you to migrate in or out of AWS. It's up to customers based on how they want to run their workload. So it is much easier to move away from something like the cloud than it is from some of the old software services that has created some of this phobia. But I think when you look at most CIOs, enterprise CIOs particularly, as they think about moving to the cloud, many of them started off thinking that they, you know, very well might split their workloads across multiple cloud providers. And I think when push comes to shove, very few decide to do so. Most predominately pick an infrastructure provider to run their workloads. And the reason that they don't split it across, you know, pretty evenly across clouds is a few reasons. Number one, if you do so, you have to standardize in the lowest common denominator. And these platforms are in radically different stages at this point. And if you look at something like AWS, it has a lot more functionality than anybody else by a large margin. And we're also iterating more quickly than you'll find from the other providers. And most folks don't want to tie the hands of their developers behind their backs in the name of having the ability of splitting it across multiple clouds, cause they actually are, in most of their spaces, competitive, and they have a lot of ideas that they want to actually build and invent on behalf of their customers. So, you know, they don't want to actually limit their functionality. It turns out the second reason is that they don't want to force their development teams to have to learn multiple platforms. And most development teams, if any of you have managed multiple stacks across different technologies, and many of us have had that experience, it's a pain in the butt. And trying to make a shift from what you've been doing for the last 30 years on premises to the cloud is hard enough. But then forcing teams to have to get good at running across two or three platforms is something most teams don't relish, and it's wasteful of people's time, it's wasteful of natural resources. That's the second thing. And then the third reason is that you effectively diminish your buying power because all of these cloud providers have volume discounts, and then you're splitting what you buy across multiple providers, which gives you a lower amount you buy from everybody at a worse price. So when most CIOs and enterprises look at this carefully, they don't actually end up splitting it relatively evenly. They predominately pick a cloud provider. Some will just pick one. Others will pick one and then do a little bit with a second, just so they know they can run with a second provider, in case that relationship with the one they choose to predominately run with goes sideways in some fashion. But when you really look at it, CIOs are not making that decision to split it up relatively evenly because it makes their development teams much less capable and much less agile. >> Okay, let's shift gears a little bit, talk about a subject that's on the minds of not just enterprises but startups and government organizations and pretty much every organization we talk to. And that's AI and machine learning. Reinvent, we introduced our Amazon AI services and just this morning Werner announced the general availability of Amazon Lex. So where are we overall on machine learning? >> Well it's a hugely exciting opportunity for customers, and I think, we believe it's exciting for us as well. And it's still in the relatively early stages, if you look at how people are using it, but it's something that we passionately believe is going to make a huge difference in the world and a huge difference with customers, and that we're investing a pretty gigantic amount of resource and capability for our customers. And I think the way that we think about, at a high level, the machine learning and deep learning spaces are, you know, there's kind of three macro layers of the stack. I think at that bottom layer, it's generally for the expert machine learning practitioners, of which there are relatively few in the world. It's a scarce resource relative to what I think will be the case in five, 10 years from now. And these are folks who are comfortable working with deep learning engines, know how to build models, know how to tune those models, know how to do inference, know how to get that data from the models into production apps. And for that group of people, if you look at the vast majority of machine learning and deep learning that's being done in the cloud today, it's being done on top of AWS, are P2 instances, which are optimized for deep learning and our deep learning AMIs, that package, effectively the deep learning engines and libraries inside those AMIs. And you see companies like Netflix, Nvidia, and Pinterest and Stanford and a whole bunch of others that are doing significant amounts of machine learning on top of those optimized instances for machine learning and the deep learning AMIs. And I think that you can expect, over time, that we'll continue to build additional capabilities and tools for those expert practitioners. I think we will support and do support every single one of the deep learning engines on top of AWS, and we have a significant amount of those workloads with all those engines running on top of AWS today. We also are making, I would say, a disproportionate investment of our own resources and the MXNet community just because if you look at running deep learning models once you get beyond a few GPUs, it's pretty difficult to have those scale as you get into the hundreds of GPUs. And most of the deep learning engines don't scale very well horizontally. And so what we've found through a lot of extensive testing, cause remember, Amazon has thousands of deep learning experts inside the company that have built very sophisticated deep learning capabilities, like the ones you see in Alexa, we have found that MXNet scales the best and almost linearly, as we continue to add nodes, as we continue to horizontally scale. So we have a lot of investment at that bottom layer of the stack. Now, if you think about most companies with developers, it's still largely inaccessible to them to do the type of machine learning and deep learning that they'd really like to do. And that's because the tools, I think, are still too primitive. And there's a number of services out there, we built one ourselves in Amazon Machine Learning that we have a lot of customers use, and yet I would argue that all of those services, including our own, are still more difficult than they should be for everyday developers to be able to build machine learning and access machine learning and deep learning. And if you look at the history of what AWS has done, in every part of our business, and a lot of what's driven us, is trying to democratize technologies that were really only available and accessible before to a select, small number of companies. And so we're doing a lot of work at what I would call that middle layer of the stack to get rid of a lot of the muck associated with having to do, you know, building the models, tuning the models, doing the inference, figuring how to get the data into production apps, a lot of those capabilities at that middle layer that we think are really essential to allow deep learning and machine learning to reach its full potential. And then at the top layer of the stack, we think of those as solutions. And those are things like, pass me an image and I'll tell you what that image is, or show me this face, does it match faces in this group of faces, or pass me a string of text and I'll give you an mpg file, or give me some words and what your intent is and then I'll be able to return answers that allow people to build conversational apps like the Lex technology. And we have a whole bunch of other services coming in that area, atop of Lex and Polly and Recognition, and you can imagine some of those that we've had to use in Amazon over the years that we'll continue to make available for you, our customers. So very significant level of investment at all three layers of that stack. We think it's relatively early days in the space but have a lot of passion and excitement for that. >> Okay, now for ML and AI, we're seeing customers wanting to load in tons of data, both to train the models and to actually process data once they've built their models. And then outside of ML and AI, we're seeing just as much demand to move in data for analytics and traditional workloads. So as people are looking to move more and more data to the cloud, how are we thinking about making it easier to get data in? >> It's a great question. And I think it's actually an often overlooked question because a lot of what gets attention with customers is all the really interesting services that allow you to do everything from compute and storage and database and messaging and analytics and machine learning and AI. But at the end of the day, if you have a significant amount of data already somewhere else, you have to get it into the cloud to be able to take advantage of all these capabilities that you don't have on premises. And so we have spent a disproportionate amount of focus over the last few years trying to build capabilities for our customers to make this easier. And we have a set of capabilities that really is not close to matched anywhere else, in part because we have so many customers who are asking for help in this area that it's, you know, that's really what drives what we build. So of course, you could use the good old-fashioned wire to send data over the internet. Increasingly, we find customers that are trying to move large amounts of data into S3, is using our S3 transfer acceleration service, which basically uses our points of presence, or POPs, all over the world to expedite delivery into S3. You know, a few years ago, we were talking to a number of companies that were looking to make big shifts to the cloud, and they said, well, I need to move lots of data that just isn't viable for me to move it over the wire, given the connection we can assign to it. It's why we built Snowball. And so we launched Snowball a couple years ago, which is really, it's a 50 terabyte appliance that is encrypted, the data's encrypted three different ways, and you ingest the data from your data center into Snowball, it has a Kindle connected to it, it allows you to, you know, that makes sure that you send it to the right place, and you can also track the progress of your high-speed ingestion into our data centers. And when we first launched Snowball, we launched it at Reinvent a couple years ago, I could not believe that we were going to order as many Snowballs to start with as the team wanted to order. And in fact, I reproached the team and I said, this is way too much, why don't we first see if people actually use any of these Snowballs. And so the team thankfully didn't listen very carefully to that, and they really only pared back a little bit. And then it turned out that we, almost from the get-go, had ordered 10X too few. And so this has been something that people have used in a very broad, pervasive way all over the world. And last year, at the beginning of the year, as we were asking people what else they would like us to build in Snowball, customers told us a few things that were pretty interesting to us. First, one that wasn't that surprising was they said, well, it would be great if they were bigger, you know, if instead of 50 terabytes it was more data I could store on each device. Then they said, you know, one of the problems is when I load the data onto a Snowball and send it to you, I have to still keep my local copy on premises until it's ingested, cause I can't risk losing that data. So they said it would be great if you could find a way to provide clustering, so that I don't have to keep that copy on premises. That was pretty interesting. And then they said, you know, there's some of that data that I'd actually like to be loading synchronously to S3, and then, or some things back from S3 to that data that I may want to compare against. That was interesting, having that endpoint. And then they said, well, we'd really love it if there was some compute on those Snowballs so I can do analytics on some relatively short-term signals that I want to take action on right away. Those were really the pieces of feedback that informed Snowball Edge, which is the next version of Snowball that we launched, announced at Reinvent this past November. So it has, it's a hundred-terabyte appliance, still the same level of encryption, and it has clustering so that you don't have to keep that copy of the data local. It allows you to have an endpoint to S3 to synchronously load data back and forth, and then it has a compute inside of it. And so it allows customers to use these on premises. I'll give you a good example. GE is using these for their wind turbines. And they collect all kinds of data from those turbines, but there's certain short-term signals they want to do analytics on in as close to real time as they can, and take action on those. And so they use that compute to do the analytics and then when they fill up that Snowball Edge, they detach it and send it back to AWS to do broad-scale analytics in the cloud and then just start using an additional Snowball Edge to capture that short-term data and be able to do those analytics. So Snowball Edge is, you know, we just launched it a couple months ago, again, amazed at the type of response, how many customers are starting to deploy those all over the place. I think if you have exabytes of data that you need to move, it's not so easy. An exabyte of data, if you wanted to move from on premises to AWS, would require 10,000 Snowball Edges. Those customers don't want to really manage a fleet of 10,000 Snowball Edges if they don't have to. And so, we tried to figure out how to solve that problem, and it's why we launched Snowmobile back at Reinvent in November, which effectively, it's a hundred-petabyte container on a 45-foot trailer that we will take a truck and bring out to your facility. It comes with its own power and its own network fiber that we plug in to your data center. And if you want to move an exabyte of data over a 10 gigabit per second connection, it would take you 26 years. But using 10 Snowmobiles, it would take you six months. So really different level of scale. And you'd be surprised how many companies have exabytes of data at this point that they want to move to the cloud to get all those analytics and machine learning capabilities running on top of them. Then for streaming data, as we have more and more companies that are doing real-time analytics of streaming data, we have Kinesis, where we built something called the Kinesis Firehose that makes it really simple to stream all your real-time data. We have a storage gateway for companies that want to keep certain data hot, locally, and then asynchronously be loading the rest of their data to AWS to be able to use in different formats, should they need it as backup or should they choose to make a transition. So it's a very broad set of storage capabilities. And then of course, if you've moved a lot of data into the cloud or into anything, you realize that one of the hardest parts that people often leave to the end is ETL. And so we have announced an ETL service called Glue, which we announced at Reinvent, which is going to make it much easier to move your data, be able to find your data and map your data to different locations and do ETL, which of course is hugely important as you're moving large amounts. >> So we've talked a lot about moving things to the cloud, moving applications, moving data. But let's shift gears a little bit and talk about something not on the cloud, connected devices. >> Yeah. >> Where do they fit in and how do you think about edge? >> Well, you know, I've been working on AWS since the start of AWS, and we've been in the market for a little over 11 years at this point. And we have encountered, as I'm sure all of you have, many buzzwords. And of all the buzzwords that everybody has talked about, I think I can make a pretty strong argument that the one that has delivered fastest on its promise has been IOT and connected devices. Just amazing to me how much is happening at the edge today and how fast that's changing with device manufacturers. And I think that if you look out 10 years from now, when you talk about hybrid, I think most companies, majority on premise piece of hybrid will not be servers, it will be connected devices. There are going to be billions of devices all over the place, in your home, in your office, in factories, in oil fields, in agricultural fields, on ships, in cars, in planes, everywhere. You're going to have these assets that sit at the edge that companies are going to want to be able to collect data on, do analytics on, and then take action. And if you think about it, most of these devices, by their very nature, have relatively little CPU and have relatively little disk, which makes the cloud disproportionately important for them to supplement them. It's why you see most of the big, successful IOT applications today are using AWS to supplement them. Illumina has hooked up their genome sequencing to AWS to do analytics, or you can look at Major League Baseball Statcast is an IOT application built on top of AWS, or John Deer has over 200,000 telematically enabled tractors that are collecting real-time planting conditions and information that they're doing analytics on and sending it back to farmers so they can figure out where and how to optimally plant. Tata Motors manages their truck fleet this way. Phillips has their smart lighting project. I mean, there're innumerable amounts of these IOT applications built on top of AWS where the cloud is supplementing the device's capability. But when you think about these becoming more mission-critical applications for companies, there are going to be certain functions and certain conditions by which they're not going to want to connect back to the cloud. They're not going to want to take the time for that round trip. They're not going to have connectivity in some cases to be able to make a round trip to the cloud. And what they really want is customers really want the same capabilities they have on AWS, with AWS IOT, but on the devices themselves. And if you've ever tried to develop on these embedded devices, it's not for mere mortals. It's pretty delicate and it's pretty scary and there's a lot of archaic protocols associated with it, pretty tough to do it all and to do it without taking down your application. And so what we did was we built something called Greengrass, and we announced it at Reinvent. And Greengrass is really like a software module that you can effectively have inside your device. And it allows developers to write lambda functions, it's got lambda inside of it, and it allows customers to write lambda functions, some of which they want to run in the cloud, some of which they want to run on the device itself through Greengrass. So they have a common programming model to build those functions, to take the signals they see and take the actions they want to take against that, which is really going to help, I think, across all these IOT devices to be able to be much more flexible and allow the devices and the analytics and the actions you take to be much smarter, more intelligent. It's also why we built Snowball Edge. Snowball Edge, if you think about it, is really a purpose-built Greengrass device. We have Greengrass, it's inside of the Snowball Edge, and you know, the GE wind turbine example is a good example of that. And so it's to us, I think it's the future of what the on-premises piece of hybrid's going to be. I think there're going to be billions of devices all over the place and people are going to want to interact with them with a common programming model like they use in AWS and the cloud, and we're continuing to invest very significantly to make that easier and easier for companies. >> We've talked about several feature directions. We talked about AI, machine learning, the edge. What are some of the other areas of investment that this group should care about? >> Well there's a lot. (laughs) That's not a suit question, Ariel. But there's a lot. I think, I'll name a few. I think first of all, as I alluded to earlier, we are not close to being done expanding geographically. I think virtually every tier-one country will have an AWS region over time. I think many of the emerging countries will as well. I think the database space is an area that is radically changing. It's happening at a faster pace than I think people sometimes realize. And I think it's good news for all of you. I think the database space over the last few decades has been a lonely place for customers. I think that they have felt particularly locked into companies that are expensive and proprietary and have high degrees of lock-in and aren't so customer-friendly. And I think customers are sick of it. And we have a relational database service that we launched many years ago and has many flavors that you can run. You can run MySQL, you can run Postgres, you can run MariaDB, you can run SQLServer, you can run Oracle. And what a lot of our customers kept saying to us was, could you please figure out a way to have a database capability that has the performance characteristics of the commercial-grade databases but the customer-friendly and pricing model of the more open engines like the MySQL and Postgres and MariaDB. What you do on your own, we do a lot of it at Amazon, but it's hard, I mean, it takes a lot of work and a lot of tuning. And our customers really wanted us to solve that problem for them. And it's why we spent several years building Aurora, which is our own database engine that we built, but that's fully compatible with MySQL and with Postgres. It's at least as fault tolerant and durable and performant as the commercial-grade databases, but it's a tenth of the cost of those. And it's also nice because if it turns out that you use Aurora and you decide for whatever reason you don't want to use Aurora anymore, because it's fully compatible with MySQL and Postgres, you just dump it to the community versions of those, and off you are. So there's really hardly any transition there. So that is the fastest-growing service in the history of AWS. I'm amazed at how quickly it's grown. I think you may have heard earlier, we've had 23,000 database migrations just in the last year or so. There's a lot of pent-up demand to have database freedom. And we're here to help you have it. You know, I think on the analytic side, it's just never been easier and less expensive to collect, store, analyze, and share data than it is today. Part of that has to do with the economics of the cloud. But a lot of it has to do with the really broad analytics capability that we provide you. And it's a much broader capability than you'll find elsewhere. And you know, you can manage Hadoop and Spark and Presto and Hive and Pig and Yarn on top of AWS, or we have a managed elastic search service, and you know, of course we have a very high scale, very high performing data warehouse in Redshift, that just got even more performant with Spectrum, which now can query across all of your S3 data, and of course you have Athena, where you can query S3 directly. We have a service that allows you to do real-time analytics of streaming data in Kinesis. We have a business intelligence service in QuickSight. We have a number of machine learning capabilities I talked about earlier. It's a very broad array. And what we find is that it's a new day in analytics for companies. A lot of the data that companies felt like they had to throw away before, either because it was too expensive to hold or they didn't really have the tools accessible to them to get the learning from that data, it's a totally different day today. And so we have a pretty big investment in that space, I mentioned Glue earlier to do ETL on all that data. We have a lot more coming in that space. I think compute, super interesting, you know, I think you will find, I think we will find that companies will use full instances for many, many years and we have, you know, more than double the number of instances than you'll find elsewhere in every imaginable shape and size. But I would also say that the trend we see is that more and more companies are using smaller units of compute, and it's why you see containers becoming so popular. We have a really big business in ECS. And we will continue to build out the capability there. We have companies really running virtually every type of container and orchestration and management service on top of AWS at this point. And then of course, a couple years ago, we pioneered the event-driven serverless capability in compute that we call Lambda, which I'm just again, blown away by how many customers are using that for everything, in every way. So I think the basic unit of compute is continuing to get smaller. I think that's really good for customers. I think the ability to be serverless is a very exciting proposition that we're continuing to to fulfill that vision that we laid out a couple years ago. And then, probably, the last thing I'd point out right now is, I think it's really interesting to see how the basic procurement of software is changing. In significant part driven by what we've been doing with our Marketplace. If you think about it, in the old world, if you were a company that was buying software, you'd have to go find bunch of the companies that you should consider, you'd have to have a lot of conversations, you'd have to talk to a lot of salespeople. Those companies, by the way, have to have a big sales team, an expensive marketing budget to go find those companies and then go sell those companies and then both companies engage in this long tap-dance around doing an agreement and the legal terms and the legal teams and it's just, the process is very arduous. Then after you buy it, you have to figure out how you're going to actually package it, how you're deploy to infrastructure and get it done, and it's just, I think in general, both consumers of software and sellers of software really don't like the process that's existed over the last few decades. And then you look at AWS Marketplace, and we have 35 hundred product listings in there from 12 hundred technology providers. If you look at the number of hours, that software that's been running EC2 just in the last month alone, it's several hundred million hours, EC2 hours, of that software being run on top of our Marketplace. And it's just completely changing how software is bought and procured. I think that if you talk to a lot of the big sellers of software, like Splunk or Trend Micro, there's a whole number of them, they'll tell you it totally changes their ability to be able to sell. You know, one of the things that really helped AWS in the early days and still continues to help us, is that we have a self-service model where we don't actually have to have a lot of people talk to every customer to get started. I think if you're a seller of software, that's very appealing, to allow people to find your software and be able to buy it. And if you're a consumer, to be able to buy it quickly, again, without the hassle of all those conversations and the overhead associated with that, very appealing. And I think it's why the marketplace has just exploded and taken off like it has. It's also really good, by the way, for systems integrators, who are often packaging things on top of that software to their clients. This makes it much easier to build kind of smaller catalogs of software products for their customers. I think when you layer on top of that the capabilities that we've announced to make it easier for SASS providers to meter and to do billing and to do identity is just, it's a very different world. And so I think that also is very exciting, both for companies and customers as well as software providers. >> We certainly touched on a lot here. And we have a lot going on, and you know, while we have customers asking us a lot about how they can use all these new services and new features, we also tend to get a lot of questions from customers on how we innovate so quickly, and they can think about applying some of those lessons learned to their own businesses. >> So you're asking how we're able to innovate quickly? >> Mmm hmm. >> I think there's a few things that have helped us, and it's different for every company. But some of these might be helpful. I'll point to a few. I think the first thing is, I think we disproportionately index on hiring builders. And we think of builders as people who are inventors, people who look at different customer experiences really critically, are honest about what's flawed about them, and then seek to reinvent them. And then people who understand that launch is the starting line and not the finish line. There's very little that any of us ever built that's a home run right out of the gate. And so most things that succeed take a lot of listening to customers and a lot of experimentation and a lot of iterating before you get to an equation that really works. So the first thing is who we hire. I think the second thing is how we organize. And we have, at Amazon, long tried to organize into as small and separable and autonomous teams as we can, that have all the resources in those teams to own their own destiny. And so for instance, the technologists and the product managers are part of the same team. And a lot of that is because we don't want the finger pointing that goes back and forth between the teams, and if they're on the same team, they focus all their energy on owning it together and understanding what customers need from them, spending a disproportionate amount of time with customers, and then they get to own their own roadmaps. One of the reasons we don't publish a 12 to 18 month roadmap is we want those teams to have the freedom, in talking to customers and listening to what you tell us matters, to re-prioritize if there are certain things that we assumed mattered more than it turns out it does. So, you know I think that the way that we organize is the second piece. I think a third piece is all of our teams get to use the same AWS building blocks that all of you get to use, which allow you to move much more quickly. And I think one of the least told stories about Amazon over the last five years, in part because people have gotten interested in AWS, is people have missed how fast our consumer business at Amazon has iterated. Look at the amount of invention in Amazon's consumer business. And they'll tell you that a big piece of that is their ability to use the AWS building blocks like they do. I think a fourth thing is many big companies, as they get larger, what starts to happen is what people call the institutional no, which is that leaders walk into meetings on new ideas looking to find ways to say no, and not because they're ill intended but just because they get more conservative or they have a lot on their plate or things are really managed very centrally, so it's hard to imagine adding more to what you're already doing. At Amazon, it's really the opposite, and in part because of the way we're organized in such a decoupled, decentralized fashion, and in part because it's just part of our DNA. When the leaders walk into a meeting, they are looking for ways to say yes. And we don't say yes to everything, we have a lot of proposals. But we say yes to a lot more than I think virtually any other company on the planet. And when we're having conversations with builders who are proposing new ideas, we're in a mode where we're trying to problem-solve with them to get to yes, which I think is really different. And then I think the last thing is that we have mechanisms inside the company that allow us to make fast decisions. And if you want a little bit more detail, you should read our founder and CEO Jeff Bezos's shareholder letter, which just was released. He talks about the fast decision-making that happens inside the company. It's really true. We make fast decisions and we're willing to fail. And you know, we sometimes talk about how we're working on several of our next biggest failures, and we hope that most of the things we're doing aren't going to fail, but we know, if you're going to push the envelope and if you're going to experiment at the rate that we're trying to experiment, to find more pillars that allow us to do more for customers and allow us to be more relevant, you are going to fail sometimes. And you have to accept that, and you have to have a way of evaluating people that recognizes the inputs, meaning the things that they actually delivered as opposed to the outputs, cause on new ventures, you don't know what the outputs are going to be, you don't know consumers or customers are going to respond to the new thing you're trying to build. So you have to be able to reward employees on the inputs, you have to have a way for them to continue to progress and grow in their career even if they work on something didn't work. And you have to have a way of thinking about, when things don't work, how do I take the technology that I built as part of that, that really actually does work, but I didn't get it right in the form factor, and use it for other things. And I think that when you think about a culture like Amazon, that disproportionately hires builders, organizes into these separable, autonomous teams, and allows them to use building blocks to move fast, and has a leadership team that's looking to say yes to ideas and is willing to fail, you end up finding not only do you do more inventing but you get the people at every level of the organization spending their free cycles thinking about new ideas because it actually pays to think of new ideas cause you get a shot to try it. And so that has really helped us and I think most of our customers who have made significant shifts to AWS and the cloud would argue that that's one of the big transformational things they've seen in their companies as well. >> Okay. I want to go a little bit deeper on the subject of culture. What are some of the things that are most unique about the AWS culture that companies should know about when they're looking to partner with us? >> Well, I think if you're making a decision on a predominant infrastructure provider, it's really important that you decide that the culture of the company you're going to partner with is a fit for yours. And you know, it's a super important decision that you don't want to have to redo multiple times cause it's wasted effort. And I think that, look, I've been at Amazon for almost 20 years at this point, so I have obviously drank the Kool Aid. But there are a few things that I think are truly unique about Amazon's culture. I'll talk about three of them. The first is I think that we are unusually customer-oriented. And I think a lot of companies talk about being customer-oriented, but few actually are. I think most of the big technology companies truthfully are competitor-focused. They kind of look at what competitors are doing and then they try to one-up one another. You have one or two of them that I would say are product-focused, where they say, hey, it's great, you Mr. and Mrs. Customer have ideas on a product, but leave that to the experts, and you know, you'll like the products we're going to build. And those strategies can be good ones and successful ones, they're just not ours. We are driven by what customers tell us matters to them. We don't build technology for technology's sake, we don't become, you know, smitten by any one technology. We're trying to solve real problems for our customers. 90% of what we build is driven by what you tell us matters. And the other 10% is listening to you, and even if you can't articulate exactly what you want, trying to read between the lines and invent on your behalf. So that's the first thing. Second thing is that we are pioneers. We really like to invent, as I was talking about earlier. And I think most big technology companies at this point have either lost their will or their DNA to invent. Most of them acquire it or fast follow. And again, that can be a successful strategy. It's just not ours. I think in this day and age, where we're going through as big a shift as we are in the cloud, which is the biggest technology shift in our lifetime, as dynamic as it is, being able to partner with a company that has the most functionality, it's iterating the fastest, has the most customers, has the largest ecosystem of partners, has SIs and ISPs, that has had a vision for how all these pieces fit together from the start, instead of trying to patch them together in a following act, you have a big advantage. I think that the third thing is that we're unusually long-term oriented. And I think that you won't ever see us show up at your door the last day of a quarter, the last day of a year, trying to harass you into doing some kind of deal with us, not to be heard from again for a couple years when we either audit you or try to re-up you for a deal. That's just not the way that we will ever operate. We are trying to build a business, a set of relationships, that will outlast all of us here. And I think something that always ties it together well is this trusted advisor capability that we have inside our support function, which is, you know, we look at dozens of programmatic ways that our customers are using the platform and reach out to you if you're doing something we think's suboptimal. And one of the things we do is if you're not fully utilizing resources, or hardly, or not using them at all, we'll reach out and say, hey, you should stop paying for this. And over the last couple of years, we've sent out a couple million of these notifications that have led to actual annualized savings for customers of 350 million dollars. So I ask you, how many of your technology partners reach out to you and say stop spending money with us? To the tune of 350 million dollars lost revenue per year. Not too many. And I think when we first started doing it, people though it was gimmicky, but if you understand what I just talked about with regard to our culture, it makes perfect sense. We don't want to make money from customers unless you're getting value. We want to reinvent an experience that we think has been broken for the prior few decades. And then we're trying to build a relationship with you that outlasts all of us, and we think the best way to do that is to provide value and do right by customers over a long period of time. >> Okay, keeping going on the culture subject, what about some of the quirky things about Amazon's culture that people might find interesting or useful? >> Well there are a lot of quirky parts to our culture. And I think any, you know lots of companies who have strong culture will argue they have quirky pieces but I think there's a few I might point to. You know, I think the first would be the first several years I was with the company, I guess the first six years or so I was at the company, like most companies, all the information that was presented was via PowerPoint. And we would find that it was a very inefficient way to consume information. You know, you were often shaded by the charisma of the presenter, sometimes you would overweight what the presenters said based on whether they were a good presenter. And vice versa. You would very rarely have a deep conversation, cause you have no room on PowerPoint slides to have any depth. You would interrupt the presenter constantly with questions that they hadn't really thought through cause they didn't think they were going to have to present that level of depth. You constantly have the, you know, you'd ask the question, oh, I'm going to get to that in five slides, you want to do that now or you want to do that in five slides, you know, it was just maddening. And we would often find that most of the meetings required multiple meetings. And so we made a decision as a company to effectively ban PowerPoints as a communication vehicle inside the company. Really the only time I do PowerPoints is at Reinvent. And maybe that shows. And what we found is that it's a much more substantive and effective and time-efficient way to have conversations because there is no way to fake depth in a six-page narrative. So what we went to from PowerPoint was six-page narrative. You can write, have as much as you want in the appendix, but you have to assume nobody will read the appendices. Everything you have to communicate has to be done in six pages. You can't fake depth in a six-page narrative. And so what we do is we all get to the room, we spend 20 minutes or so reading the document so it's fresh in everybody's head. And then where we start the conversation is a radically different spot than when you're hearing a presentation one kind of shallow slide at a time. We all start the conversation with a fair bit of depth on the topic, and we can really hone in on the three or four issues that typically matter in each of these conversations. So we get to the heart of the matter and we can have one meeting on the topic instead of three or four. So that has been really, I mean it's unusual and it takes some time getting used to but it is a much more effective way to pay attention to the detail and have a substantive conversation. You know, I think a second thing, if you look at our working backwards process, we don't write a lot of code for any of our services until we write and refine and decide we have crisp press release and frequently asked question, or FAQ, for that product. And in the press release, what we're trying to do is make sure that we're building a product that has benefits that will really matter. How many times have we all gotten to the end of products and by the time we get there, we kind of think about what we're launching and think, this is not that interesting. Like, people are not going to find this that compelling. And it's because you just haven't thought through and argued and debated and made sure that you drew the line in the right spot on a set of benefits that will really matter to customers. So that's why we use the press release. The FAQ is to really have the arguments up front about how you're building the product. So what technology are you using? What's the architecture? What's the customer experience? What's the UI look like? What's the pricing dimensions? Are you going to charge for it or not? All of those decisions, what are people going to be most excited about, what are people going to be most disappointed by. All those conversations, if you have them up front, even if it takes you a few times to go through it, you can just let the teams build, and you don't have to check in with them except on the dates. And so we find that if we take the time up front we not only get the products right more often but the teams also deliver much more quickly and with much less churn. And then the third thing I'd say that's kind of quirky is it is an unusually truth-seeking culture at Amazon. I think we have a leadership principle that we say have backbone, disagree, and commit. And what it means is that we really expect people to speak up if they believe that we're headed down a path that's wrong for customers, no matter who is advancing it, what level in the company, everybody is empowered and expected to speak up. And then once we have the debate, then we all have to pull the same way, even if it's a different way than you were advocating. And I think, you always hear the old adage of where, two people look at a ceiling and one person says it's 14 feet and the other person says, it's 10 feet, and they say, okay let's compromise, it's 12 feet. And of course, it's not 12 feet, there is an answer. And not all things that we all consider has that black and white answer, but most things have an answer that really is more right if you actually assess it and debate it. And so we have an environment that really empowers people to challenge one another and I think it's part of why we end up getting to better answers, cause we have that level of openness and rigor. >> Okay, well Andy, we have time for one more question. >> Okay. >> So other than some of the things you've talked about, like customer focus, innovation, and long-term orientation, what is the single most important lesson that you've learned that is really relevant to this audience and this time we're living in? >> There's a lot. But I'll pick one. I would say I'll tell a short story that I think captures it. In the early days at Amazon, our sole business was what we called an owned inventory retail business, which meant we bought the inventory from distributors or publishers or manufacturers, stored it in our own fulfillment centers and shipped it to customers. And around the year 1999 or 2000, this third party seller model started becoming very popular. You know, these were companies like Half.com and eBay and folks like that. And we had a really animated debate inside the company about whether we should allow third party sellers to sell on the Amazon site. And the concerns internally were, first of all, we just had this fundamental belief that other sellers weren't going to care as much about the customer experience as we did cause it was such a central part of everything we did DNA-wise. And then also we had this entire business and all this machinery that was built around owned inventory business, with all these relationships with publishers and distributors and manufacturers, who we didn't think would necessarily like third party sellers selling right alongside us having bought their products. And so we really debated this, and we ultimately decided that we were going to allow third party sellers to sell in our marketplace. And we made that decision in part because it was better for customers, it allowed them to have lower prices, so more price variety and better selection. But also in significant part because we realized you can't fight gravity. If something is going to happen, whether you want it to happen or not, it is going to happen. And you are much better off cannibalizing yourself or being ahead of whatever direction the world is headed than you are at howling at the wind or wishing it away or trying to put up blockers and find a way to delay moving to the model that is really most successful and has the most amount of benefits for the customers in question. And that turned out to be a really important lesson for Amazon as a company and for me, personally, as well. You know, in the early days of doing Marketplace, we had all kinds of folks, even after we made the decision, that despite the have backbone, disagree and commit weren't really sure that they believed that it was going to be a successful decision. And it took several months, but thankfully we really were vigilant about it, and today in roughly half of the units we sell in our retail business are third party seller units. Been really good for our customers. And really good for our business as well. And I think the same thing is really applicable to the space we're talking about today, to the cloud, as you think about this gigantic shift that's going on right now, moving to the cloud, which is, you know, I think in the early days of the cloud, the first, I'll call it six, seven, eight years, I think collectively we consumed so much energy with all these arguments about are people going to move to the cloud, what are they going to move to the cloud, will they move mission-critical applications to the cloud, will the enterprise adopt it, will public sector adopt it, what about private cloud, you know, we just consumed a huge amount of energy and it was, you can see both in the results in what's happening in businesses like ours, it was a form of fighting gravity. And today we don't really have if conversations anymore with our customers. They're all when and how and what order conversations. And I would say that this going to be a much better world for all of us, because we will be able to build in a much more cost effective fashion, we will be able to build much more quickly, we'll be able to take our scarce resource of engineers and not spend their resource on the undifferentiated heavy lifting of infrastructure and instead on what truly differentiates your business. And you'll have a global presence, so that you have lower latency and a better end user customer experience being deployed with your applications and infrastructure all over the world. And you'll be able to meet the data sovereignty requirements of various locales. So I think it's a great world that we're entering right now, I think we're at a time where there's a lot less confusion about where the world is headed, and I think it's an unprecedented opportunity for you to reinvent your businesses, reinvent your applications, and build capabilities for your customers and for your business that weren't easily possible before. And I hope you take advantage of it, and we'll be right here every step of the way to help you. Thank you very much. I appreciate it. (applause) >> Thank you, Andy. And thank you, everyone. I appreciate your time today. >> Thank you. (applause) (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
of Worldwide Marketing, Amazon Web Services, Ariel Kelman. It is my pleasure to introduce to come up on stage here, I have a bunch of questions here for you, Andy. of a state of the state on AWS. And I think if you look at that collection of things, a lot of customers moving to AWS, And of course that's not the case. and how they should think about their relationship And I think the reality is when you look at the cloud, talk about a subject that's on the minds And I think that you can expect, over time, So as people are looking to move and it has clustering so that you don't and talk about something not on the cloud, And I think that if you look out 10 years from now, What are some of the other areas of investment and we have, you know, more than double and you know, while we have customers and listening to what you tell us matters, What are some of the things that are most unique And the other 10% is listening to you, And I think any, you know lots of companies moving to the cloud, which is, you know, And thank you, everyone. Thank you.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Amadeus | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Western Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nvidia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
France | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sweden | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ningxia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stanford | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ariel Kelman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
26 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ariel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six pages | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six-page | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
14 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
47% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five slides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
350 million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10X | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
November | DATE | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
second reason | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
McDonalds | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |