Rachel Skaff, AWS | International Women's Day
(gentle music) >> Hello, and welcome to theCUBE's coverage of International Women's Day. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. I've got a great guest here, CUBE alumni and very impressive, inspiring, Rachel Mushahwar Skaff, who's a managing director and general manager at AWS. Rachel, great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Thank you so much. It's always a pleasure to be here. You all make such a tremendous impact with reporting out what's happening in the tech space, and frankly, investing in topics like this, so thank you. >> It's our pleasure. Your career has been really impressive. You worked at Intel for almost a decade, and that company is very tech, very focused on Moore's law, cadence of technology power in the industry. Now at AWS, powering next-generation cloud. What inspired you to get into tech? How did you get here and how have you approached your career journey, because it's quite a track record? >> Wow, how long do we have? (Rachel and John laugh) >> John: We can go as long as you want. (laughs) It's great. >> You know, all joking aside, I think at the end of the day, it's about this simple statement. If you don't get goosebumps every single morning that you're waking up to do your job, it's not good enough. And that's a bit about how I've made all of the different career transitions that I have. You know, everything from building out data centers around the world, to leading network and engineering teams, to leading applications teams, to going and working for, you know, the largest semiconductor in the world, and now at AWS, every single one of those opportunities gave me goosebumps. And I was really focused on how do I surround myself with humans that are better than I am, smarter than I am, companies that plan in decades, but live in moments, companies that invest in their employees and create like artists? And frankly, for me, being part of a company where people know that life is finite, but they want to make an infinite impact, that's a bit about my career journey in a nutshell. >> Yeah. What's interesting is that, you know, over the years, a lot's changed, and a theme that we're hearing from leaders now that are heading up large teams and running companies, they have, you know, they have 20-plus years of experience under their belt and they look back and they say, "Wow, "things have changed and it's changing faster now, "hopefully faster to get change." But they all talk about confidence and they talk about curiosity and building. When did you know that this was going to be something that you got the goosebumps? And were there blockers in your way and how did you handle that? (Rachel laughs) >> There's always blockers in our way, and I think a lot of people don't actually talk about the blockers. I think they make it sound like, hey, I had this plan from day one, and every decision I've made has been perfect. And for me, I'll tell you, right, there are moments in your life that mark a differentiation and those moments that you realize nothing will be the same. And time is kind of divided into two parts, right, before this moment and after this moment. And that's everything from, before I had kids, that's a pretty big moment in people's lives, to after I had kids, and how do you work through some of those opportunities? Before I got married, before I got divorced. Before I went to this company, after I left this company. And I think the key for all of those is just having an insatiable curiosity around how do you continue to do better, create better and make better? And I'll tell you, those blockers, they exist. Coming back from maternity leave, hard. Coming back from a medical leave, hard. Coming back from caring for a sick parent or a sick friend, hard. But all of those things start to help craft who you are as a human being, not as a leader, but as a human being, and allows you to have some empathy with the people that you surround yourself with, right? And for me, it's, (sighs) you can think about these blockers in one of two ways. You can think about it as, you know, every single time that you're tempted to react in the same way to a blocker, you can be a prisoner of your past, or you can change how you react and be a pioneer of the future. It's not a blocker when you think about it in those terms. >> Mindset matters, and that's really a great point. You brought up something that's interesting, I want to bring this up. Some of the challenges in different stages of our lives. You know, one thing that's come out of this set of interviews, this, of day and in conversations is, that I haven't heard before, is the result of COVID, working at home brought empathy about people's personal lives to the table. That came up in a couple interviews. What's your reaction to that? Because that highlights that we're human, to your point of view. >> It does. It does. And I'm so thankful that you don't ask about balance because that is a pet peeve of mine, because there is no such thing as balance. If you're in perfect balance, you are not moving and you're not changing. But when you think about, you know, the impact of COVID and how the world has changed since that, it has allowed all of us to really think about, you know, what do we want to do versus what do we have to do? And I think so many times, in both our professional lives and our personal lives, we get caught up in doing what we think we have to do to get ahead versus taking a step back and saying, "Hey, what do I want to do? "And how do I become a, you know, "a better human?" And many times, John, I'm asked, "Hey, "how do you define success or achievement?" And, you know, my answer is really, for me, the greatest results that I've achieved, both personally and professionally, is when I eliminate the word success and balance from my vocabulary, and replace them with two words: What's my contribution and what's my impact? Those things make a difference, regardless of gender. And I'll tell you, none of it is easy, ever. I think all of us have been broken, we've been stretched, we've been burnt out. But I also think what we have to talk about as leaders in the industry is how we've also found endurance and resilience. And when we felt unsteady, we've continued to go forward, right? When we can't decide, the best answer is do what's uncomfortable. And all of those things really stemmed from a part of what happened with COVID. >> Yeah, yeah, I love the uncomfortable and the balance highlight. You mentioned being off balance. That means you're growing, you're not standing still. I want to get your thoughts on this because one thing that has come out again this year, and last year as well, is having a team with you when you do it. So if you're off balance and you're going to stretch, if you have a good team with you, that's where people help each other. Not just pick them up, but like maybe get 'em back on track again. So, but if you're solo, you fall, (laughs) you fall harder. So what's your reaction to that? 'Cause this has come up, and this comes up in team building, workforce formation, goal setting, contribution. What's your reaction to that? >> So my reaction to that that is pretty simple. Nobody gets there on their own at all, right? Passion and ambition can only take you so far. You've got to have people and teams that are supporting you. And here's the funny thing about people, and frankly, about being a leader that I think is really important: People don't follow for you. People follow for who you help them become. Think about that for a second. And when you think about all the amazing things that companies and teams are able to do, it's because of those people. And it's because you have leaders that are out there, inspiring them to take what they believe is impossible and turn it into the possible. That's the power of teams. >> Can you give an example of your approach on how you do that? How do you build your teams? How do you grow them? How do you lead them effectively and also make 'em inclusive, diverse and equitable? >> Whew. I'll give you a great example of some work that we're doing at AWS. This year at re:Invent, for the first time in its history, we've launched an initiative with theCUBE called Women of the Cloud. And part of Women of the Cloud is highlighting the business impact that so many of our partners, our customers and our employees have had on the social, on the economic and on the financials of many companies. They just haven't had the opportunity to tell their story. And at Amazon, right, it is absolutely integral to us to highlight those examples and continue to extend that ethos to our partners and our customers. And I think one of the things that I shared with you at re:Invent was, you know, as U2's Bono put it, (John laughs) "We'll build it better than we did before "and we are the people "that we've been waiting for." So if we're not out there, advocating and highlighting all the amazing things that other women are doing in the ecosystem, who will? >> Well, I've got to say, I want to give you props for that program. Not only was it groundbreaking, it's still running strong. And I saw some things on LinkedIn that were really impressive in its network effect. And I met at least half a dozen new people I never would have met before through some of that content interaction and engagement. And this is like the power of the current world. I mean, getting the voices out there creates momentum. And it's good for Amazon. It's not just personal brand building for my next job or whatever, you know, reason. It's sharing and it's attracting others, and it's causing people to connect and meet each other in that world. So it's still going strong. (laughs) And this program we did last year was part of Rachel Thornton, who's now at MessageBird, and Mary Camarata. They were the sponsors for this International Women's Day. They're not there anymore, so we decided we're going to do it again because the impact is so significant. We had the Amazon Education group on. It's amazing and it's free, and we've got to get the word out. I mean, talk about leveling up fast. You get in and you get trained and get certified, and there's a zillion jobs out (laughs) there in cloud, right, and partners. So this kind of leadership is really important. What was the key learnings that you've taken away and how do you extend this opportunity to nurture the talent out there in the field? Because when you throw the content out there from great leaders and practitioners and developers, it attracts other people. >> It does. It does. So look, I think there's two types of people, people that are focused on being and people who are focused on doing. And let me give you an example, right? When we think about labels of, hey, Rachel's a female executive who launched Women of the Cloud, that label really limits me. I'd rather just be a great executive. Or, hey, there's a great entrepreneur. Let's not be a great entrepreneur. Just go build something and sell it. And that's part of this whole Women of the cloud, is I don't want people focused on what their label is. I want people sharing their stories about what they're doing, and that's where the lasting impact happens, right? I think about something that my grandmother used to tell me, and she used to tell me, "Rachel, how successful "you are, doesn't matter. "The lasting impact that you have "is your legacy in this very finite time "that you have on Earth. "Leave a legacy." And that's what Women of the Cloud is about. So that people can start to say, "Oh, geez, "I didn't know that that was possible. "I didn't think about my career in that way." And, you know, all of those different types of stories that you're hearing out there. >> And I want to highlight something you said. We had another Amazonian on the program for this day earlier and she coined a term, 'cause inside Amazon, you have common language. One of them is bar raising. Raise the bar, that's an Amazonian (Rachel laughs) term. It means contribute and improve and raise the bar of capability. She said, "Bar raising is gender neutral. "The bar is a bar." And I'm like, wow, that was amazing. Now, that means your contribution angle there highlights that. What's the biggest challenge to get that mindset set in culture, in these- >> Oh. >> 'Cause it's that simple, contribution is neutral. >> It absolutely is neutral, but it's like I said earlier, I think so many times, people are focused on success and being a great leader versus what's the contribution I'm making and how am I doing as a leader, you know? And when it comes to a lot of the leadership principles that Amazon has, including bar raising, which means insisting on the highest standards, and then those standards continue to raise every single time. And what that is all about is having all of our employees figure out, how do I get better every single day, right? That's what it's about. It's not about being better than the peer next to you. It's about how do I become a better leader, a better human being than I was yesterday? >> Awesome. >> You know, I read this really cute quote and I think it really resonates. "You meditate to upgrade your software "and you work out to upgrade your hardware." And while it's important that we're all ourselves at work, we can't deny that a lot of times, ourselves still need that meditation or that workout. >> Well, I hope I don't have any zero days in my software out there, so, but I'm going to definitely work on that. I love that quote. I'm going to use that. Thank you very much. That was awesome. I got to ask you, I know you're really passionate about, and we've talked about this, around, so you're a great leader but you're also focused on what's behind you in the generation, pipelining women leaders, okay? Seats at the table, mentoring and sponsorship. What can we do to build a strong pipeline of leaders in technology and business? And where do you see the biggest opportunity to nurture the talent in these fields? >> Hmm, you know, that's great, great question. And, you know, I just read a "Forbes" article by another Amazonian, Tanuja Randery, who talked about, you know, some really interesting stats. And one of the stats that she shared was, you know, by 2030, less than 25% of tech specialists will be female, less than 25%. That's only a 6% growth from where we are in 2023, so in seven years. That's alarming. So we've really got to figure out what are the kinds of things that we're going to go do from an Amazon perspective to impact that? And one of the obvious starting points is showcasing tech careers to girls and young women, and talking openly about what a technology career looks like. So specifically at Amazon, we've got an AWS Git IT program that helps schools and educators bring in tech role models to show them what potential careers look like in tech. I think that's one great way that we can help build the pipeline, but once we get the pipeline, we also have to figure out how we don't let that pipeline leak. Meaning how do we keep women and, you know, young women on their tech career? And I think big part of that, John, is really talking about how hard it is, but it's also greater than you can ever imagine. And letting them see executives that are very authentic and will talk about, geez, you know, the challenges of COVID were a time of crisis and accelerated change, and here's what it meant to me personally and here's what we were able to solve professionally. These younger generations are all about social impact, they're about economic impact and they're about financial impact. And if we're not talking about all three of those, both from how AWS is leading from the front, but how its executives are also taking that into their personal lives, they're not going to want to go into tech. >> Yeah, and I think one of the things you mentioned there about getting people that get IT, good call out there, but also, Amazon's going to train 30 million people, put hundreds of millions of dollars into education. And not only are they making it easier to get in to get trained, but once you're in, even savvy folks that are in there still have to accelerate. And there's more ways to level up, more things are happening, but there's a big trend around people changing careers either in their late 20s, early 30s, or even those moments you talk about, where it's before and after, even later in the careers, 40s, 50s. Leaders like, well, good experience, good training, who were in another discipline who re-skilled. So you have, you know, more certifications coming in. So there's still other pivot points in the pipeline. It's not just down here. And that, I find that interesting. Are you seeing that same leadership opportunities coming in where someone can come into tech older? >> Absolutely. You know, we've got some amazing programs, like Amazon Returnity, that really focuses on how do we get other, you know, how do we get women that have taken some time off of work to get back into the workforce? And here's the other thing about switching careers. If I look back on my career, I started out as a civil engineer, heavy highway construction. And now I lead a sales team at the largest cloud company in the world. And there were, you know, twists and turns around there. I've always focused on how do we change and how do we continue to evolve? So it's not just focused on, you know, young women in the pipeline. It's focused on all gender and all diverse types throughout their career, and making sure that we're providing an inclusive environment for them to bring in their unique skillsets. >> Yeah, a building has good steel. It's well structured. Roads have great foundations. You know, you got the builder in you there. >> Yes. >> So I have to ask you, what's on your mind as a tech athlete, as an executive at AWS? You know, you got your huge team, big goals, the economy's got a little bit of a headwind, but still, cloud's transforming, edge is exploding. What's your outlook as you look out in the tech landscape these days and how are you thinking about it? What your plans? Can you share a little bit about what's on your mind? >> Sure. So, geez, there's so many trends that are top of mind right now. Everything from zero trust to artificial intelligence to security. We have more access to data now than ever before. So the opportunities are limitless when we think about how we can apply technology to solve some really difficult customer problems, right? Innovation sometimes feels like it's happening at a rapid pace. And I also say, you know, there are years when nothing happens, and then there's years when centuries happen. And I feel like we're kind of in those years where centuries are happening. Cloud technologies are refining sports as we know them now. There's a surge of innovation in smart energy. Everyone's supply chain is looking to transform. Custom silicon is going mainstream. And frankly, AWS's customers and partners are expecting us to come to them with a point of view on trends and on opportunities. And that's what differentiates us. (John laughs) That's what gives me goosebumps- >> I was just going to ask you that. Does that give you goosebumps? How could you not love technology with that excitement? I mean, AI, throw in AI, too. I just talked to Swami, who heads up the AI and database, and we just talked about the past 24 months, the change. And that is a century moment happening. The large language models, computer vision, more compute. Compute's booming than ever before. Who thought that was going to happen, is still happening? Massive change. So, I mean, if you're in tech, how can you not love tech? >> I know, even if you're not in tech, I think you've got to start to love tech because it gives you access to things you've never had before. And frankly, right, change is the only constant. And if you don't like change, you're going to like being irrelevant even less than you like change. So we've got to be nimble, we've got to adapt. And here's the great thing, once we figure it out, it changes all over again. And it's not something that's easy for any of us to operate. It's hard, right? It's hard learning new technology, it's hard figuring out what do I do next? But here's the secret. I think it's hard because we're doing it right. It's not hard because we're doing it wrong. It's just hard to be human and it's hard to figure out how we apply all this different technology in a way that positively impacts us, you know, economically, financially, environmentally and socially. >> And everyone's different, too. So you got to live those (mumbles). I want to get one more question in before we, my last question, which is about you and your impact. When you talk to your team, your sales, you got a large sales team, North America. And Tanuja, who you mentioned, is in EMEA, we're going to speak with her as well. You guys lead the front lines, helping customers, but also delivering the revenue to the company, which has been fantastic, by the way. So what's your message to the troops and the team out there? When you say, "Take that hill," like what is the motivational pitch, in a few sentences? What's the main North Star message in today's marketplace when you're doing that big team meeting? >> I don't know if it's just limited to a team meeting. I think this is a universal message, and the universal message for me is find your edge, whatever that may be. Whether it is the edge of what you know about artificial intelligence and neural networks or it's the edge of how do we migrate our applications to the cloud more quickly. Or it's the edge of, oh, my gosh, how do I be a better parent and still be great at work, right? Find your edge, and then sharpen it. Go to the brink of what you think is possible, and then force yourself to jump. Get involved. The world is run by the people that show up, professionally and personally. (John laughs) So show up and get started. >> Yeah as Steve Jobs once said, "The future "that everyone looks at was created "by people no smarter than you." And I love that quote. That's really there. Final question for you. I know we're tight on time, but I want to get this in. When you think about your impact on your company, AWS, and the industry, what's something you want people to remember? >> Oh, geez. I think what I want people to remember the most is it's not about what you've said, and this is a Maya Angelou quote. "It's not about what you've said to people "or what you've done, "it's about how you've made them feel." And we can all think back on leaders or we can all think back on personal moments in our lives where we felt like we belonged, where we felt like we did something amazing, where we felt loved. And those are the moments that sit with us for the rest of our lives. I want people to remember how they felt when they were part of something bigger. I want people to belong. It shouldn't be uncommon to talk about feelings at work. So I want people to feel. >> Rachel, thank you for your time. I know you're really busy and we stretched you a little bit there. Thank you so much for contributing to this wonderful day of great leaders sharing their stories. And you're an inspiration. Thanks for everything you do. We appreciate you. >> Thank you. And let's go do some more Women of the Cloud videos. >> We (laughs) got more coming. Bring those stories on. Back up the story truck. We're ready to go. Thanks so much. >> That's good. >> Thank you. >> Okay, this is theCUBE's coverage of International Women's Day. It's not just going to be March 8th. That's the big celebration day. It's going to be every quarter, more stories coming. Stay tuned at siliconangle.com and thecube.net here, with bringing all the stories. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
and very impressive, inspiring, Thank you so much. and how have you approached long as you want. to going and working for, you know, and how did you handle that? and how do you work through Some of the challenges in And I'm so thankful that you don't ask and the balance highlight. And it's because you have leaders that I shared with you at re:Invent and how do you extend this opportunity And let me give you an example, right? and raise the bar of capability. contribution is neutral. than the peer next to you. "and you work out to And where do you see And one of the stats that she shared the things you mentioned there And there were, you know, twists You know, you got the and how are you thinking about it? And I also say, you know, I was just going to ask you that. And if you don't like change, And Tanuja, who you mentioned, is in EMEA, of what you know about And I love that quote. And we can all think back on leaders Rachel, thank you for your time. Women of the Cloud videos. We're ready to go. It's not just going to be March 8th.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rachel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tim Cook | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tanuja Randery | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rachel Thornton | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nayaki | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Ford | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tanuja | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rachel Skaff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Todd Skidmore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Bob Stefanski | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Jobs | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Joyce | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Laura Cooney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Todd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2011 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mary Camarata | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Meg Whitman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Blackberry | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Coca-Cola | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sanjay Srivastava | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
BMC Software | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Siri | TITLE | 0.99+ |
BMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Motorola | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Samsung | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mihir Shukla | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nayaki Nayyar | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rachel Mushahwar Skaff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
6% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Share A Coke | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dustin Plantholt, Forbes Monaco | Monaco Crypto Summit 2022
>>Okay, welcome back everyone to the Cube's live coverage here in Monaco for the MoCo crypto summit. I'm John fur. You're host of the cube. We got a great guest Dustin plant Boltz who is a crypto advisor, but also the crypto editor for Forbes Monaco here. Seeing the official event, the AAL event of the Monaco crypto summit in Monaco, your coverage area for Forbes, your MCing. Welcome to the >>Cube. Thank you for having me. And it's, it's always fun when I get to have an event in our backyard, cuz I get to hear what others know. And to me I'm very curious. Yeah. Always >>Learning. So you're on the MC on the stage here, you know, queue in the program online great program. So it's innovative event, inaugural event, great name by the way. Crypto summit and mono crypto >>Summit. Yeah, the MoCo crypto summit. >>That sounds like I want to attend every year. >>You're you're more than welcome to attend next year. >>Well, I hope so. Either way. I'm at the Al event with you. So gimme the take on what's on stage. What's been the program, like what's your observations going on here at the event today? >>So what we're starting to see globally is this digitization of things and the people that are part of the innovation side. And so that's what we've been able to see this morning. We're we're now at the break is what sort of companies are out there, the good ones and what are they building? Is this innovation? Is it even innovative and figuring out how they're gonna do it and the roadmaps to getting there from the metaverses to NFTs and even to decentralized finance. >>Yeah, it's the number one question I get is what's legit. What's not legit. And then you're starting to see the, the, the wheat and the shaft separating here and you know, something called crypto winter. But I don't see it. I mean, I see correction for some of the bad things going on in terms of not having the right underpinning infrastructure, the creative ideas are amazing. We're also seeing like digital bits and other platforms kind of coming together to enable the creators and, and the NFT side for instance has been huge. What has been your observation on that enablement? Because you have two schools of thoughts. You have the total nerds we're up and down building everything. Then you have artists and creators, whether it's music, tech apps building, they don't necessarily want to get 'em to the covers. They don't want to deal with all that. Yeah. Have you seen, what's your, what's your take on that? >>So I I'm seeing that a lot of these major brands, you know, they they're striving for excellence. You know, they're being more careful of who they partner with and the types of companies and you know, they, they look at it from reality and a little tough love to figure out should they align their brand. So what we're seeing here is is that there is so much inertia moving forward. That we're just at the beginning of this thing. Yeah. McKinsey recently said that the ecosystem will be over $30 trillion. So when you recognize that we are so early and it's those right now, or some might say are the risk takers. But to me there, aren't taking risk. They're being a part of making history. >>Yeah. You get the pioneers and you get the financial. So as they come together, how do you see the market? Cause what I've noticed with crypto and here in, in this, this market is international. One lot of international finance us is kind of lag behind. You got all kinds of rules, but you got the, the combination of the, the future billionaires. Sure. Okay. The pioneers and then the financeers yeah. Coming the money, the money and the power coming together. What's your reporting show you that's going on right now? What should people know about on how this is evolving? What they shouldn't >>Expect? Well, so you have a group that wants to become cryers they're seeing these individuals globally. They're making lots and lots of money, but what they don't realize is that not everybody is gonna have that outcome, but looking at the technology aspect of it and how it's going to improve a system that many can agree is collectively broken legacy just can't move beyond. It was never designed to you'll see people take shots at certain card companies and I go, but you recognize they developed the assembly line. And so I'm seeing that the smart money they got in long ago, believe it or not. And those now they're looking out for their errors are the ones that saying, I will not have an excuse when my, my grandkids or my, my nieces or my nephews, when they come and ask, where were you when the greatest transformational shift in human history, from both education to jobs, to careers and even wealth was being shifted to a digital world, why were you on the sideline waiting? And so I think what we're gonna see is this tsunami coming, and it's gonna start with one big player and then two and five, you go, go alone. You go far, go together. You go further. And that's what we're seeing is that this collective is moving forward >>And the community, we just had Beth Kaiser on, I've known Beth for many, many years. And she's what she's her journey has done. She's had a great mission and then gets she's a data scientist and came to Analytica. Now she's doing work with Ukraine and the rallying support around it has been impressive. And it's a community vibe, but the community's not just like sympathetic they're hands on together to your point. >>Yeah. It, but it also takes courage. I mean, you look at Britney Kaiser and what she had, and to me, courage is not, not having fear. Courage is not allowing the fear to stop. You, you know, recently asked my executive coach, who's 85 and I'm turning 39. This question of, do you let fear stop you? How do you decide? And he said, you know, you can either let, you can either ride the dragon. And I said, or let the dragon chase you. And Brittany has been one of these that made a decision to do what was right. And it came down to integrity. Yeah. >>So what are you have to these days what's going on in your world? >>What is going on in my world? So I moderate events all over and I connect and I like to ask people questions. So I'm gonna ask you, I'm gonna turn at the interviewer on the >>Interview. It's good. Natural. >>What are you learning? >>I mean, I'm learning, I mean today or this week or this month or this year. Well, I was just talking with Brittany about this. The security world is converging cloud technology, cloud computing. That revolution has just been amazing. Amazon posted their earnings yesterday. They blew it away as far as I'm concerned. So they kind of show there's no tech recession. I've learned that this recession, that we're so called in is the first downturn in tech where there's been cloud players as hyperscalers as an economic engine. Okay. So from a, from a business perspective, Amazon web services, Microsoft Azure now Google cloud, Alibaba's now in, in international version. This is the first time at downturns ever happened with cloud computing as an economic engine. And so therefore what I'm seeing is the digital transformation that's happening across the world for enterprises and entrepreneurs is not stopping. >>It's actually accelerating. So although the GDPs down in inflation is down, you're seeing a massive shift continuing to accelerate, spending and transformation with cloud technologies and decentralized. So you can almost see it kind of in the, this event and other events, even some of the bigger events, the best smartest people are working on it. The applications in all the categories are transforming. If cloud is step one, decentralized gonna be step two. So I see that kind of bridge going from cloud computing, cloud native to decentralized native. And I think a D DAPP market's gonna just explode. I think NFTs are just scratched on the surface. I think that's kind of, I won't say gimmicky, but I think no, but you're right, much more of a much more of a, an illustration that there's more coming. >>There is a lot more coming because people are seeing that there's more to an NFT than an ugly luck and J you know, ugly and JP image that there's, that there's data in there. And that your avatar will be stored as just that as an NFT. And I learned today from go of sing, that decentralization is, is the key to innovation. And I agree with that statement. Holy. >>Yeah. I mean, I think access to stuff is gonna be multidimensional. Like you think about the NFT as, as an ID, whether it's him or UN unstoppable domains is that company just got financing another round where the billion dollars, their concept is like, Hey, one NFT is your access for all of your potential identities in context. >>And isn't that exciting that we're now gonna be at this stage where you travel with you. Yeah. Instead of someone else traveling with you, you get to decide who you will be. And to me, everything you're doing in this world, this reality is now becoming part of your digital asset as a whole. >>I remember when I started my podcasting company in 20 2004, early pioneers, Evan Williams was there with Odo and you had, you know, the blogging revolution going on that whole democratization wave actually didn't happen right then. But all the people that were involved in that web two oh, kind of CRAs was all about democratization. It's kind of happening now. I mean, 15, 20 years later at web services is transformed cloud the democratization for own your own data, putting users in control. And I think in the middle of that, the Facebook's the world, the world garden data, you know, manipulation kind of took it off track a little bit. So I think now I'm, I psych to see that it's back on track to where it was. I mean, Facebook made billions of dollars. Now you got LinkedIn. I mean, LinkedIn's great for your resume, but it's also become a wall's garden with no data export. >>Yeah. And then >>No APIs keep >>Changing. Think about this. That if you wanna apply for a job, just change something quickly. Yeah. Ah, now you're the senior VP. Yeah. Before you were, you're an office manager >>Like to see the immutable block change, >>You don't get to see when did the record change. Yeah. >>Reputation data. You're a digital exhaust people gonna wanna reign that in. And I think the user in charge message that Brit Kaiser was talks about is hugely a mess under, under, under amplified concept. Digital assets are key, but the data ownership is something that I think is, is >>Powerful. So I'm gonna be launching a brand new company in and around September called cryptos. And it's a crypto career center. Think of it like the, the crypto for LinkedIn, that it's an aggregator becoming the industry standard for education, becoming the industry standard for crypto ships, with partners like ledger and moon pay and Casper labs. >>Look at this, we got an exclusive scoop on the cube. This >>Is the first time I will tell you this the first time in, in an environment like this. Yeah. That I'm excited to, I'm excited to talk about, right. Because it's time to be part of the change. Yeah, exactly. You know, as a father, I look at, I know where it's headed in the world of business. I know in the world of this, that we're gonna call the internet of connected things. Yeah. That it's gonna require you to have a certain talent skill or a certain certification. And to me, it's important to have an industry that supports one >>Staff and also, and also history on misinformation, smear campaigns can happen and ruin a career >>Overnight. Can you imagine that one little thing and because the internet never forgets. Yeah. It stays around indefinitely. >>The truth has to come out. Dustin. Great to have you on the queue. Thank you so much. Final question. What have you learned in there is MC what's your takeaway real quick? >>What I've learned is I never tire of learning. Thank you again, to learn more. Dustin plan.com. >>All right. Thanks for coming. Thank you. Cube coverage here at Monaco. I'm Shawn furry. We'll back with more coverage after this short break.
SUMMARY :
You're host of the cube. And to me I'm very curious. So it's innovative event, inaugural event, great name by the way. So gimme the take on what's on stage. do it and the roadmaps to getting there from the metaverses to NFTs and even to the wheat and the shaft separating here and you know, something called crypto winter. So I I'm seeing that a lot of these major brands, you know, they they're striving for excellence. So as they come together, how do you see the market? And so I'm seeing that the smart money they And the community, we just had Beth Kaiser on, I've known Beth for many, many years. And he said, you know, you can either let, you can either ride the dragon. connect and I like to ask people questions. This is the first So although the GDPs down in inflation is down, you're seeing a There is a lot more coming because people are seeing that there's more to an NFT than an ugly luck and J you Like you think about the NFT as, And isn't that exciting that we're now gonna be at this stage where you travel with you. So I think now I'm, I psych to see that it's back on track to where it was. Before you were, you're an office manager You don't get to see when did the record change. And I think the user in charge message that Brit Kaiser was talks about is hugely becoming the industry standard for crypto ships, with partners like ledger and moon pay and Casper Look at this, we got an exclusive scoop on the cube. Is the first time I will tell you this the first time in, in an environment like this. Can you imagine that one little thing and because the internet never forgets. Great to have you on the queue. Thank you again, to learn more. We'll back with more coverage after this
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Evan Williams | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brittany | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dustin Plantholt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Britney Kaiser | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Monaco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
85 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Beth Kaiser | PERSON | 0.99+ |
billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 2004 | DATE | 0.99+ |
39 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over $30 trillion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John fur | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Beth | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dustin plant Boltz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
this week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dustin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
NFT | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this month | DATE | 0.98+ |
Forbes | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
moon pay | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
billions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Shawn | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Casper | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
step one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Al | EVENT | 0.96+ |
Monaco Crypto Summit 2022 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
Dustin plan.com | OTHER | 0.94+ |
step two | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
AAL | EVENT | 0.91+ |
first downturn | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.9+ |
Brit Kaiser | PERSON | 0.86+ |
one big player | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
one little thing | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
two schools | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
ledger | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
MoCo crypto summit | EVENT | 0.82+ |
Monaco crypto summit | EVENT | 0.81+ |
20 years later | DATE | 0.78+ |
15, | DATE | 0.77+ |
Google cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
Ukraine | LOCATION | 0.72+ |
Analytica | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.7+ |
September | DATE | 0.65+ |
McKinsey | ORGANIZATION | 0.64+ |
lots of money | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
UN | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
Cube | LOCATION | 0.56+ |
Odo | PERSON | 0.51+ |
wave | EVENT | 0.5+ |
Cube | PERSON | 0.43+ |
Erik Bradley | AWS Summit New York 2022
>>Hello, everyone. Welcome to the cubes coverage here. New York city for AWS Amazon web services summit 2022. I'm John furrier, host of the cube with Dave ante. My co-host. We are breaking it down, getting an update on the ecosystem. As the GDP drops, inflations up gas prices up the enterprise continues to grow. We're seeing exceptional growth. We're here on the ground floor. Live at the Summit's packed house, 10,000 people. Eric Bradley's here. Chief STR at ETR, one of the premier enterprise research firms out there, partners with the cube and powers are breaking analysis that Dave does check that out as the hottest podcast in enterprise. Eric. Great to have you on the cube. Thanks for coming on. >>Thank you so much, John. I really appreciate the collaboration always. >>Yeah. Great stuff. Your data's amazing ETR folks watching check out ETR. They have a unique formula, very accurate. We love it. It's been moving the market. Congratulations. Let's talk about the market right now. This market is booming. Enterprise is the hottest thing, consumers kind of in the toilet. Okay. I said that all right, back out devices and, and, and consumer enterprise is still growing. And by the way, this first downturn, the history of the world where hyperscalers are on full pumping on all cylinders, which means they're still powering the revolution. >>Yeah, it's true. The hyperscalers were basically at this two sun system when Microsoft and an AWS first came around and everything was orbiting around it. And we're starting to see that sun cool off a little bit, but we're talking about a gradient here, right? When we say cool off, we're not talking to shutdown, it's still burning hot. That's for sure. And I can get it to some of the macro data in a minute, if that's all right. Or do you want me to go right? No, go go. Right. Yeah. So right now we just closed our most recent survey and that's macro and vendor specific. We had 1200 people talk to us on the macro side. And what we're seeing here is a cool down in spending. We originally had about 8.5% increase in budgets. That's cool down is 6.5 now, but I'll say with the doom and gloom and the headlines that we're seeing every day, 6.5% growth coming off of what we just did the last couple of years is still pretty fantastic as a backdrop. >>Okay. So you, you started to see John mentioned consumer. We saw that in Snowflake's earnings. For example, we, we certainly saw, you know, Walmart, other retailers, the FA Facebooks of the world where consumption was being dialed down, certain snowflake customers. Not necessarily, they didn't have mentioned any customers, but they were able to say, all right, we're gonna dial down, consumption this quarter, hold on until we saw some of that in snowflake results and other results. But at the same time, the rest of the industry is booming. But your data is showing softness within the fortune 500 for AWS, >>Not only AWS, but fortune 500 across the board. Okay. So going back to that larger macro data, the biggest drop in spending that we captured is fortune 500, which is surprising. But at the same time, these companies have a better purview into the economy. In general, they tend to see things further in advance. And we often remember they spend a lot of money, so they don't need to play catch up. They'll easily more easily be able to pump the brakes a little bit in the fortune 500. But to your point, when we get into the AWS data, the fortune 500 decrease seems to be hitting them a little bit more than it is Azure and GCP. I >>Mean, we're still talking about a huge business, right? >>I mean, they're catching up. I mean, Amazon has been transforming from owning the developer cloud startup cloud decade ago to really putting a dent on the enterprise as being number one cloud. And I still contest that they're number one by a long ways, but Azure kicking ass and catching up. Okay. You seeing people move to Azure, you got Charlie bell over there, Sean, by former Amazonians, Theresa Carlson, people are going over there, there there's lift over at Azure. >>There certainly is. >>Is there kinks in the arm or for AWS? There's >>A couple of kinks, but I think your point is really good. We need to take a second there. If you're talking about true pass or infrastructure is a service true cloud compute. I think AWS still is the powerhouse. And a lot of times the, the data gets a little muddied because Azure is really a hosted platform for applications. And you're not really sure where that line is drawn. And I think that's an important caveat to make, but based on the data, yes, we are seeing some kinks in the armor for AWS. Yes. Explain. So right now, a first of all caveat, 40% net score, which is our proprietary spending metric across the board. So we're not like raising any alarms here. It's still strong that said there are declines and there are declines pretty much across the board. The only spot we're not seeing a decline at all is in container, spend everything else is coming down specifically. We're seeing it come down in data analytics, data warehousing, and M I, which is a little bit of a concern because that, that rate of decline is not the same with Azure. >>Okay. So I gotta ask macro, I see the headwinds on the macro side, you pointed that out. Is there any insight into any underlying conditions that might be there on AWS or just a chronic kind of situational thing >>Right now? It seems situational. Other than that correlation between their big fortune 500, you know, audience and that being our biggest decline. The other aspect of the macro survey is we ask people, if you are planning to decline spend, how do you plan on doing it? And the number two answer is taking a look at our cloud spend and auditing it. So they're kind say, all right, you know, for the last 10 years it's been drunken, sail or spend, I >>Was gonna use that same line, you know, >>Cloud spend, just spend and we'll figure it out later, who cares? And then right now it's time to tighten the belts a little bit, >>But this is part of the allure of cloud at some point. Yeah. You, you could say, I'm gonna, I'm gonna dial it down. I'm gonna rein it in. So that's part of the reason why people go to the cloud. I want to, I wanna focus in on the data side of things and specifically the database. Let, just to give some context if, and correct me if I'm, I'm a little off here, but snowflake, which hot company, you know, on the planet, their net score was up around 80% consistently. It it's dropped down the last, you know, quarter, last survey to 60%. Yeah. So still highly, highly elevated, but that's relative to where Amazon is much larger, but you're saying they're coming down to the 40% level. Is that right? >>Yeah, they are. And I remember, you know, when I first started doing this 10 years ago, AWS at a 70%, you know, net score as well. So what's gonna happen over time is those adoptions are gonna get less and you're gonna see more flattening of spend, which ultimately is going to lower the score because we're looking for expansion rates. We wanna see adoption and increase. And when you see flattening a spend, it starts to contract a little bit. And you're right. Snowflake also was in the stratosphere that cooled off a little bit, but still, you know, very strong and AWS is coming down. I think the reason why it's so concerning is because a it's within the fortune 500 and their rate of decline is more than Azure right >>Now. Well, and, and one of the big trends you're seeing in database is this idea of converging function. In other words, bringing transaction and analytics right together at snowflake summit, they added the capability to handle transaction data, Mongo DB, which is largely mostly transactions added the capability in June to bring in analytic data. You see data bricks going from data engineering and data science now getting into snowflake space and analytics. So you're seeing that convergence Oracle is converging with my SQL heat wave and their core databases, couch base couch base is doing the same. Maria do virtually all these database companies are, are converging their platforms with the exception of AWS. AWS is still the right tool for the right job. So they've got Aurora, they've got RDS, they've got, you know, a dynamo DV, they've got red, they've got, you know, going on and on and on. And so the question everybody's asking is will that change? Will they start to sort of cross those swim lanes? We haven't seen it thus far. How is that affecting the data >>Performance? I mean, that's fantastic analysis. I think that's why we're seeing it because you have to be in the AWS ecosystem and they're really not playing nicely with others in the sandbox right now that now I will say, oh, Amazon's not playing nicely. Well, no, no. Simply to your point though, that there, the other ones are actually bringing in others at consolidating other different vendor types. And they're really not. You know, if you're in AWS, you need to stay within AWS. Now I will say their tools are fantastic. So if you do stay within AWS, they have a tool for every job they're advanced. And they're incredible. I think sometimes the complexity of their tools hurts them a little bit. Cause to your point earlier, AWS started as a developer-centric type of cloud. They have moved on to enterprise cloud and it's a little bit more business oriented, but their still roots are still DevOps friendly. And unless you're truly trained, AWS can be a little scary. >>So a common use case is I'm gonna be using Aurora for my transaction system and then I'm gonna ETL it into Redshift. Right. And, and I, now I have two data stores and I have two different sets of APIs and primitives two different teams of skills. And so that is probably causing some friction and complexity in the customer base that again, the question is, will they begin to expand some of those platforms to minimize some of that friction? >>Well, yeah, this is the question I wanted to ask on that point. So I've heard from people inside Amazon don't count out Redshift, we're making, we're catching up. I think that's my word, but they were kind of saying that right. Cuz Redshift is good, good database, but they're adding a lot more. So you got snowflake success. I think it's a little bit of a jealousy factor going on there within Redshift team, but then you got Azure synapse with the Synap product synapse. Yep. And then you got big query from Google big >>Query. Yep. >>What's the differentiation. What are you seeing for the data for the data warehouse or the data clouds that are out there for the customers? What's the data say, say to us? >>Yeah, unfortunately the data's showing that they're dropping a little bit whose day AWS is dropping a little bit now of their data products, Redshift and RDS are still the two highest of them, but they are starting to decline. Now I think one of the great data points that we have, we just closed the survey is we took a comparison of the legacy data. Now please forgive me for the word legacy. We're gonna anger a few people, but we Gotter data Oracle on-prem, we've got IBM. Some of those more legacy data warehouse type of names. When we look at our art survey takers that have them where their spend is going, that spends going to snowflake first, and then it's going to Google and then it's going to Microsoft Azure and, and AWS is actually declining in there. So when you talk about who's taking that legacy market share, it's not AWS right now. >>So legacy goes to legacy. So Microsoft, >>So, so let's work through in a little context because Redshift really was the first to take, you know, take the database to the cloud. And they did that by doing a one time license deal with par XL, which was an on-prem database. And then they re-engineered it, they did a fantastic job, but it was still engineered for on-prem. Then you along comes snowflake a couple years later and true cloud native, same thing with big query. Yep. True cloud native architecture. So they get a lot of props. Now what, what Amazon did, they took a page outta of the snowflake, for example, separating compute from storage. Now of course what's what, what Amazon did is actually not really completely separating like snowflake did they couldn't because of the architecture, they created a tearing system that you could dial down the compute. So little nuances like that. I understand. But at the end of the day, what we're seeing from snowflake is the gathering of an ecosystem in this true data cloud, bringing in different data types, they got to the public markets, data bricks was not able to get to the public markets. Yeah. And think is, is struggling >>And a 25 billion evaluation. >>Right. And so that's, that's gonna be dialed down, struggling somewhat from a go to market standpoint where snowflake has no troubles from a go to market. They are the masters at go to market. And so now they've got momentum. We talked to Frank sluman at the snowflake. He basically said, I'm not taking the foot off the gas, no way. Yeah. We, few of our large, you know, consumer customers dialed things down, but we're going balls to the >>Wall. Well, if you look at their show before you get in the numbers, you look at the two shows. Snowflake had their summit in person in Vegas. Data bricks has had their show in San Francisco. And if you compare the two shows, it's clear, who's winning snowflake is blew away from a, from a market standpoint. And we were at snowflake, but we weren't at data bricks, but there was really nothing online. I heard from sources that it was like less than 3000 people. So >>Snowflake was 1900 people in 2019, nearly 10,000. Yeah. In 2020, >>It's gonna be fun to sort of track that as a, as an odd caveat to say, okay, let's see what that growth is. Because in fairness, data, bricks, you know, a little bit younger, Snowflake's had a couple more years. So I'd be curious to see where they are. Their, their Lakehouse paradigm is interesting. >>Yeah. And I think it's >>And their product first company, yes. Their go to market might be a little bit weak from our analysis, but that, but they'll figure it out. >>CEO's pretty smart. But I think it's worth pointing out. It's like two different philosophies, right? It is. Snowflake is come into our data cloud. That's their proprietary environment. They're the, they think of the iPhone, right? End to end. We, we guarantee it's all gonna work. And we're in control. Snowflake is like, Hey, open source, no, bring in data bricks. I mean data bricks, open source, bring in this tool that too, now you are seeing snowflake capitulate a little bit. They announce, for instance, Apache iceberg support at their, at the snowflake summit. So they're tipping their cap to open source. But at the end of the day, they're gonna market and sell the fact that it's gonna run better in native snowflake. Whereas data bricks, they're coming at it from much more of an open source, a mantra. So that's gonna, you know, we'll see who look at, you had windows and you had apple, >>You got, they both want, you got Cal and you got Stanford. >>They both >>Consider, I don't think it's actually there yet. I, I find the more interesting dynamic right now is between AWS and snowflake. It's really a fun tit for tat, right? I mean, AWS has the S three and then, you know, snowflake comes right on top of it and announces R two, we're gonna do one letter, one number better than you. They just seem to have this really interesting dynamic. And I, and it is SLT and no one's betting against him. I mean, this guy's fantastic. So, and he hasn't used his war chest yet. He's still sitting on all that money that he raised to your point, that data bricks five, their timing just was a little off >>5 billion in >>Capital when Slootman hasn't used that money yet. So what's he gonna do? What can he do when he turns that on? He finds the right. >>They're making some acquisitions. They did the stream lit acquisitions stream. >>Fantastic >>Problem. With data bricks, their valuation is underwater. Yes. So they're recruiting and their MNAs. Yes. In the toilet, they cannot make the moves because they don't have the currency until they refactor the multiple, let the, this market settle. I I'm, I'm really nervous that they have to over factor the >>Valuation. Having said that to your point, Eric, the lake house architecture is definitely gaining traction. When you talk to practitioners, they're all saying, yeah, we're building data lakes, we're building lake houses. You know, it's a much, much smaller market than the enterprise data warehouse. But nonetheless, when you talk to practitioners that are actually doing things like self serve data, they're building data lakes and you know, snow. I mean, data bricks is right there. And as a clear leader in, in ML and AI and they're ahead of snowflake, right. >>And I was gonna say, that's the thing with data bricks. You know, you're getting that analytics at M I built into it. >>You know, what's ironic is I remember talking to Matt Carroll, who's CEO of auDA like four or five years ago. He came into the office in ma bro. And we were in temporary space and we were talking about how there's this new workload emerging, which combines AWS for cloud infrastructure, snowflake for the simple data warehouse and data bricks for the ML AI, and then all now all of a sudden you see data bricks yeah. And snowflake going at it. I think, you know, to your point about the competition between AWS and snowflake, here's what I think, I think the Redshift team is, you know, doesn't like snowflake, right. But I think the EC two team loves it. Loves it. Exactly. So, so I think snowflake is driving a lot of, >>Yeah. To John's point, there is plenty to go around. And I think I saw just the other day, I saw somebody say less than 40% of true global 2000 organizations believe that they're at real time data analytics right now. They're not really there yet. Yeah. Think about how much runway is left and how many tools you need to get to real time streaming use cases. It's complex. It's not easy. >>It's gonna be a product value market to me, snowflake in data bricks. They're not going away. Right. They're winning architectures. Yeah. In the cloud, what data bricks did would spark and took over the Haddo market. Yeah. To your point. Now that big data, market's got two players, in my opinion, snow flicking data, bricks converging. Well, Redshift is sitting there behind the curtain, their wild card. Yeah. They're wild card, Dave. >>Okay. I'm gonna give one more wild card, which is the edge. Sure. Okay. And that's something that when you talk about real time analytics and AI referencing at the edge, there aren't a lot of database companies in a position to do that. You know, Amazon trying to put outposts out there. I think it runs RDS. I don't think it runs any other database. Right. Snowflake really doesn't have a strong edge strategy when I'm talking the far edge, the tiny edge. >>I think, I think that's gonna be HPE or Dell's gonna own the outpost market. >>I think you're right. I'll come back to that. Couch base is an interesting company to watch with Capella Mongo. DB really doesn't have a far edge strategy at this point, but couch base does. And that's one to watch. They're doing some really interesting things there. And I think >>That, but they have to leapfrog bongo in my >>Opinion. Yeah. But there's a new architecture emerging at the edge and it's gonna take a number of years to develop, but it could eventually from an economic standpoint, seep back into the enterprise arm base, low end, take a look at what couch base is >>Doing. They hired an Amazon guard system. They have to leapfrog though. They need to, they can't incrementally who's they who >>Couch >>Base needs to needs to make a big move in >>Leap frog. Well, think they're trying to, that's what Capella is all about was not only, you know, their version of Atlas bringing to the cloud couch base, but it's also stretching it out to the edge and bringing converged database analytics >>Real quick on the numbers. Any data on CloudFlare, >>I was, I've been sitting here trying to get the word CloudFlare out my mouth the whole time you guys were talking, >>Is this another that's innovated in the ecosystem. So >>Platform, it was really simple for them early on, right? They're gonna get that edge network out there and they're gonna steal share from Akamai. Then they started doing exactly what Akamai did. We're gonna start rolling out some security. Their security is fantastic. Maybe some practitioners are saying a little bit too much, cuz they're not focused on one thing or another, but they are doing extremely well. And now they're out there in the cloud as well. You >>Got S3 compare. They got two, they got an S3 competitor. >>Exactly. So when I'm listening to you guys talk about, you know, a, a couch base I'm like, wow, those two would just be an absolute fantastic, you know, combination between the two of them. You mean >>CloudFlare >>Couch base. Yeah. >>I mean you got S3 alternative, right? You got a Mongo alternative basically in my >>Opinion. And you're going and you got the edge and you got the edge >>Network with security security, interesting dynamic. This brings up the super cloud date. I wanna talk about Supercloud because we're seeing a trend on we're reporting this since last year that basically people don't have to spend the CapEx to be cloud scale. And you're seeing Amazon enable that, but snowflake has become a super cloud. They're on AWS. Now they're on Azure. Why not tan expansion expand the market? Why not get that? And then it'll be on Google next, all these marketplaces. So the emergence of this super cloud, and then the ability to make that across a substrate across multiple clouds is a strategy we're seeing. What do you, what do you think? >>Well, honestly, I'm gonna be really Frank here. The, everything I know about the super cloud I know from this guy. So I've been following his lead on this and I'm looking forward to you guys doing that conference and that summit coming up from a data perspective. I think what you're saying is spot on though, cuz those are the areas we're seeing expansion in without a doubt. >>I think, you know, when you talk about things like super cloud and you talk about things like metaverse, there's, there's a, there, there look every 15 or 20 years or so this industry reinvents itself and a new disruption comes out and you've got the internet, you've got the cloud, you've got an AI and VR layer. You've got, you've got machine intelligence. You've got now gaming. There's a new matrix, emerging, super cloud. Metaverse there's something happening out there here. That's not just your, your father's SAS or is or pass. Well, >>No, it's also the spend too. Right? So if I'm a company like say capital one or Goldman Sachs, my it spend has traditionally been massive every year. Yes. It's basically like tons of CapEx comes the cloud. It's an operating expense. Wait a minute, Amazon has all the CapEx. So I'm not gonna dial down my budget. I want a competitive advantage. So next thing they know they have a super cloud by default because they just pivoted their, it spend into new capabilities that they then can sell to the market in FinTech makes total sense. >>Right? They're building out a digital platform >>That would, that was not possible. Pre-cloud >>No, it wasn't cause you weren't gonna go put all that money into CapEx expenditure to build that out. Not knowing whether or not the market was there, but the scalability, the ability to spend, reduce and be flexible with it really changes that paradigm entire. >>So we're looking at this market now thinking about, okay, it might be Greenfield in every vertical. It might have a power law where you have a head of the long tail. That's a player like a capital one, an insurance. It could be Liberty mutual or mass mutual that has so much it and capital that they're now gonna scale it into a super cloud >>And they have data >>And they have the data tools >>And the tools. And they're gonna bring that to their constituents. Yes, yes. And scale it using >>Cloud. So that means they can then service the entire vertical as a service provider. >>And the industry cloud is becoming bigger and bigger and bigger. I mean, that's really a way that people are delivering to market. So >>Remember in the early days of cloud, all the banks thought they could build their own cloud. Yeah. Yep. Well actually it's come full circle. They're like, we can actually build a cloud on top of the cloud. >>Right. And by the way, they can have a private cloud in their super cloud. Exactly. >>And you know, it's interesting cause we're talking about financial services insurance, all the people we know spend money in our macro survey. Do you know the, the sector that's spending the most right now? It's gonna shock you energy utilities. Oh yeah. I was gonna, the energy utilities industry right now is the one spending the most money I saw largely cuz they're playing ketchup. But also because they don't have these type of things for their consumers, they need the consumer app. They need to be able to do that delivery. They need to be able to do metrics. And they're the they're, they're the one spending right >>Now it's an arms race, but the, the vector shifts to value creation. So >>It's it just goes back to your post when it was a 2012, the trillion dollar baby. Yeah. It's a multi-trillion dollar baby that they, >>The world was going my chassis post on Forbes, headline trillion dollar baby 2012. You know, I should add it's happening. That's >>On the end. Yeah, exactly. >>Trillions of babies, Eric. Great to have you on the key. >>Thank you so much guys. >>Great to bring the data. Thanks for sharing. Check out ETR. If you're into the enterprise, want to know what's going on. They have a unique approach, very accurate in their survey data. They got a great market basket of, of, of, of, of data questions and people and community. Check it out. Thanks for coming on and sharing with. >>Thank you guys. Always enjoy. >>We'll be back with more coverage here in the cube in New York city live at summit 22. I'm John fur with Dave ante. We'll be right back.
SUMMARY :
Great to have you on the cube. I really appreciate the collaboration always. And by the way, And I can get it to some of the macro data in a minute, if that's all right. For example, we, we certainly saw, you know, Walmart, other retailers, So going back to that larger macro data, You seeing people move to Azure, you got Charlie bell over there, And I think that's an important caveat to make, Is there any insight into any underlying conditions that might be there on AWS And the number two answer the last, you know, quarter, last survey to 60%. And I remember, you know, when I first started doing this 10 years ago, AWS at a 70%, And so the question everybody's asking is will that change? I think that's why we're seeing it because you have to be in And so that is probably causing some friction and complexity in the customer base that again, And then you got big query from Google big Yep. What's the data say, say to us? So when you talk about who's taking that legacy market So legacy goes to legacy. But at the end of the day, what we're seeing from snowflake They are the masters at go to market. And if you compare the two shows, it's clear, who's winning snowflake is blew away Yeah. So I'd be curious to see where they are. And their product first company, yes. I mean data bricks, open source, bring in this tool that too, now you are seeing snowflake capitulate I mean, AWS has the S three and then, He finds the right. They did the stream lit acquisitions stream. I'm really nervous that they have to over factor the they're building data lakes and you know, snow. And I was gonna say, that's the thing with data bricks. I think, you know, to your point about the competition between AWS And I think I saw just the other day, In the cloud, what data bricks did would spark And that's something that when you talk about real time And I think but it could eventually from an economic standpoint, seep back into the enterprise arm base, They have to leapfrog though. Well, think they're trying to, that's what Capella is all about was not only, you know, Real quick on the numbers. So And now they're out there in the cloud as well. They got two, they got an S3 competitor. wow, those two would just be an absolute fantastic, you know, combination between the two of them. Yeah. And you're going and you got the edge and you got the edge So the emergence of this super So I've been following his lead on this and I'm looking forward to you guys doing that conference and that summit coming up from a I think, you know, when you talk about things like super cloud and you talk about things like metaverse, Wait a minute, Amazon has all the CapEx. No, it wasn't cause you weren't gonna go put all that money into CapEx expenditure to build that out. It might have a power law where you have a head of the long tail. And they're gonna bring that to their constituents. So that means they can then service the entire vertical as a service provider. And the industry cloud is becoming bigger and bigger and bigger. Remember in the early days of cloud, all the banks thought they could build their own cloud. And by the way, they can have a private cloud in their super cloud. And you know, it's interesting cause we're talking about financial services insurance, all the people we know spend money in So It's it just goes back to your post when it was a 2012, the trillion dollar baby. You know, I should add it's happening. On the end. Great to bring the data. Thank you guys. We'll be back with more coverage here in the cube in New York city live at summit 22.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Matt Carroll | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Walmart | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Theresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Erik Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Goldman Sachs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sean | PERSON | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two shows | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
25 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Frank sluman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
60% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two players | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2012 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Akamai | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apache | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
6.5% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
auDA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John fur | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
1200 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Capella Mongo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
less than 40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
less than 3000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
CloudFlare | TITLE | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Benoit Dageville, Snowflake | Snowflake Summit 2022
(upbeat music) >> Welcome back everyone, theCUBE's three days of wall to wall coverage of Snowflake Summit '22 is coming to an end, but Dave Vellante and I, Lisa Martin are so pleased to have our final guest as none other than the co-founder and president of products at Snowflake, Benoit Dageville. Benoit, thank you so much for joining us on the program. Welcome. >> Thank you. Thank you, thank you. >> So this is day four, 'cause you guys started on Monday. This is Thursday. The amount of people that are still here speaks volumes. We've had close to 10,000 people here. >> Yeah. >> Could you ever have imagined back in the day, 10 years ago that it would come to something like this in such a short period of time? >> Absolutely not. And I always say if I had imagined that I might not have started Snowflake, right. This is somehow scary. I mean and yeah, it's huge. And you can feel the excitement of everyone. It is like mind boggling and the fact that so many people are still there after four days is great. >> Your keynote on Tuesday was fantastic. Your energy was off the charts. It was standing room only. There were overflow rooms. Like we just mentioned, a lot of people are still here. Talk about the evolution of Snowflake, this week's announcements and what it means for the future of the data cloud. >> Yeah, so evolution, I mean, I will start with the evolution. It's true that that's what we have announced. This week is not where we started necessarily. So we started really very quickly with big data combined with data warehouse as one thing. We saw that the world was moving into fragmented siloing data and we thought with Thierry, we are going to combine big data and data warehouse in one system for the cloud with this elasticity and this service simplicity. So simplicity, amazing elasticity, which is this multi workload architecture that I was explaining during the keynotes and really extreme simplicity with the service. Then we realized that there is one other attribute in the cloud, which is unique, which doesn't exist on-premise, which is collaboration. How you can connect different tenets of the platform together. And Google showed that with Google Docs. I always say to me, it was amazing that you could share document and have direct access to document that you didn't produce and you can collaborate on this document. So we wanted to do the same thing for data and this is where we created the data cloud and the marketplace where you can have all these data sets available and really the next evolution I would say is really about applications that are (indistinct) by that data, but are way simpler to use for all the tenets of the data cloud. And this is the way you can share expertise also, including, ML model, everyone talks about ML and the democratization of ML. How are you going to democratize ML? It's not by making necessary training super easy. Such that everyone can train their ML for themselves. It's by having very specialized application where data and ML is at the core, which are shared, through the marketplace and we shall leverage by many tenets of this marketplace that have no necessary knowledge about building this ML models. So that's where, yeah. >> When you and Thierry started the company, I go back to the improbable rise of Kubernetes and there were other more sophisticated container management systems back then, but they chose to focus on simplicity. And you've told me before, that was our main tenet. We are not going to worry about all the complex database stuff. You knew how to do that, but you chose not to. So my question is, did you envision solving those complex problems over time yourselves or through an ecosystem? Was this by design or did you... As you started to get into it, say let's not even try to go there let's partner to go there. >> Yeah, I mean, it's both. It's a combination of both. Snowflake, the simplicity of the platform is really important because if our partners are struggling to put their solution and build solution on top of Snowflake they will not build it. So it's very important that number one, our platform is really easy to use from day one. And that really has to be built inside the platform. You cannot build simplicity on top. You cannot have a complex solution and all of a sudden realize that, oh, this is complex. I need to build another layer on top of it to make it simpler, that will not work. So it had to be built from day one, but you're right. What is going to be Snowflake? I always say in 10 years from now, we just turn 10 years old or we are going to turn 10 years old in few months. Actually a few months, yes. >> Right. >> So for the next 10 years I really believe that most of Snowflake will not be built by Snowflake. And that's the power of the partners and these applications. When you are going to say I'm using Snowflake, actually, probably you are not going to use directly code developed by Snowflake. That code will leverage our platform, but you will use a solution that has been built on top of Snowflake. And this is the way we are going to decouple, the effort of Snowflake and multiply it. >> It's an interesting balance, isn't it? When I think of what you did with Apache Iceberg, if I use Iceberg and I'm not going to get as much functionality, but I may want that openness, but I'm going to get more functionality inside of the data cloud. And I don't know, but if you know the answer to what's going to happen. >> No, that's a super good question. So to explain what we did with Apache Iceberg, and the fact that now it's a native format for us. So everything that you can do with our internal formats, you can do it with Apache Iceberg, including security, defining masking, data masking all the governors that we have, fine grain security aspects, the replications you can define you can use (indistinct) on top of... >> But there's a but, right? But if I do that with native Snowflake tools, I'm going to get an even greater advantage, am I not? >> Yes. So that's what I'm saying. So that's why we embraced Iceberg, because I think we can bring all the benefit of Snowflake to people who have decided to use Iceberg, I mean open formats. Iceberg is a table format. So and why it was important because people had massive investments in open source in Hadoop. And we had a lot of companies saying, we love Snowflake. We want to be a Snowflake customer, but we cannot really migrate all our data. I mean, it will be really costly. And we have a lot of tools that need access, direct access. So this is why we created Iceberg because we can really... I mean, we really think that we can bring the benefit of Snowflake to this data. >> Gives customers optionality. Okay. I use this term super cloud. You don't use the term, but that's okay. And I get a lot of heat for it. But to me, what you're doing is quite a bit different than multicloud because you're creating that abstraction layer. You're bringing value above it. My question to you is, the most of the heat I get is, oh, that's just SaaS. Are you just SaaS? >> No. I mean, no, absolutely not. I mean, you're right we are a super cloud. I mean it's a much better word than saying we are multicloud. Multicloud is often viewed as oh, I have my system and now I can run this system in the different cloud providers. Snowflake is different. We have one single platform for the world, which happens to have some regions are AWS region, some regions are Azure, some regions are GCP, Google and we merge them together. We have this Snowgrid technology that connects all our regions together so that we have really one platform for the world. And that's very important because when you talk about connections of data and expertise applications you want to have global reach, right. It doesn't exist. We are not siloed by region of the world, right? You have a lot of companies which are multinational that have presence everywhere. And you want to have this global reach. The world is not a independent set of regions and countries, right. And that's the realization. So we had to create this global platform for our customers. >> And now you have people building clouds on top of your data cloud, well that to me is the next signal. In your keynote, you talked about seven pillars, all data, all workloads, global architecture, self-managed, programmable, marketplace, governance, which ones are the most important? >> All of them. It's like when you have kids, you don't want to pick and say, this one is my preferred one, so they are really important. All of them, as I said without data, there is no Snowflake, right? So all data is so important that we can reach every data, wherever it is. And Iceberg is a part of that, but all workload is really important because you don't want to put your data in one platform, if you cannot run all your workloads and workloads are much broader than just data warehousing, there is data engineering, data science, ML engineering, (indistinct) all these workloads applications. So that's critical. Programmable is where we are moving, right. We want to be the place where data applications are built. And we think we have a lot of advantages because data application needs to use many workloads at once, right? It's not that that application will do only data warehousing, they need to store their states, they need to use this new workload that we define, which is Unistore. They need to do data engineering because they need to get data, right. They have to save this data. So they need to combine many workload and if they have to stitch this workload, because the platform was not designed as one single product where everything is consistent and works together, that you have to stitch, it's complicated for this application to make it work. So Snowflake is we believe an ideal platform to run these data applications. So all workloads, programmable, obviously, so that you can program. And programmable has two aspects, which is big part of our announcement. Is both data programmability, which is running Python against petabyte, terabytes of data at scale and doing it scale out. So that's what we call data programmability. So both Java, Python and (indistinct), but also running applications like UI. And we had this acquisition of Streamlit. Streamlit now has been fully integrated in Snowflake. We announced that such that not only you can have this data programmability, but you can expose your data through this nice UIs, interactive UI to business users potentially. So it goes all the way there. Global is super important. As we say, we want to be one platform for the world. And of course, as I said, the last pillar, which is somehow critical for us, because we are cloud, we need to have governance. We need to have security of our data. And why it took us so long to do Python is not because it's out to run Python, right? Everyone can run Python it's because we had to secure it. And I talk about it creating this amazing sandboxing technology, such that when you include third party libraries and third party codes, you are guaranteed that this third party code will not reach to infiltrate your data, right. We control the environment that Snowflake provides. >> Can you share us some of the feedback from the customer? You probably had many customer conversations over the last four days. >> Look at that smile. (interviewer laughing) (Lisa laughing) >> Actually not because I was so busy everywhere. Unfortunately, I didn't speak to many customers. Saying that, I had everyone stopping me and talking about what they heard and yeah, there is a huge excitement about all of this. >> What's been the feedback around the theme of the event? The world of data collaboration. Data collaboration is so critical as every company these days must be a data company to compete, to win. What's been from just some of the feedback that you've had customers really embracing data collaboration, what Snowflake is enabling. >> Yeah. I mean, almost every company which is using Snowflake, is collaborating with data. You have heard, the number of stable edges that we have, and there is a real need for that because your data alone... You cannot make sense of your data if it is just alone. It needs to be connected with other data. You haven't not generated. So all data, when you say the first pillar of Snowflake is all data is not only about your data, but is about all the data that's created around you. That puts perspective on your own data. And that's critical and it's so painful to get. I mean, even your data is difficult to have access to your data, but imagine data that you didn't produce. And so yes, so the data collaboration is critical, and then now we expanded it to application and expertise, sharing models, for example, That's going to have a huge impact. >> All data includes now transaction data, right? >> Yes. >> That's a big part of the announcements that you guys made. >> Yeah. So and that's the motivation for that was really, if we want to run application, full application, we announced native applications, which are fully executed and run inside the (indistinct) data cloud, right. They need all the services that application need and in particular managing their states. And so we created Unistore, which is a new workload, which allows you to combine transactional data, which are generated by this application. And at the same time being able to do analytics directly on this data. So we call it Hybrid Table because it has this hybrid aspect. You can do both transactional access to this data and at the same time analytic here without having data pipeline and moving data and transforming it from the transactional system to the analytical system, right. Snowflake is one system. Again, in the spirit of simplifying everything, this is the Snowflake (indistinct). >> I can ask the same question I ask at first, (indistinct) when was the aha moment that you and Thierry had that said, this is not just a better data warehouse, it's actually more than that. You probably didn't call it a data cloud until later on, but did you know that from the beginning or was that something you kind of stumbled into? >> No. So as I said, we founded Snowflake in 2012 and Thierry and I, we locked in my apartment and we were doing the blueprint of Snowflake and trying to find what is the revolution with the cloud for this data warehouse system and analytical system, both big data and data warehouse. And the aha moment was but of course cloud, okay. What is cloud? It's elasticity, it's service and later collaboration. So in the elasticity aspect, when you ask database people, what is elasticity, they will tell you, oh, you have a cluster of nodes. Like if it is Oracle, it would be a (indistinct) cluster. And the elasticities that you can add one node, two node to this cluster without having too much impact on the existing workload, because you need to shuffle data, right. It's hard and doing it online, right, that's elasticity. If you can do that, you are elastic. We thought that that was not very interesting to do that. What is interesting with elasticity is to plug new workloads. You can plug a workload like that and that workload is running without having any impact on other workloads, which are running on the platform. So elasticity for us was having dedicated computer resources to workloads. And these computer resources could start and be part as soon as the workload starts and will shut down when the workload finishes and they will be sized exactly for the demand of that workload. And we thought the aha moment was, okay if we can do that, now we can run a workload with, let's say 10X more computer resources than what you would have used or 100X more. Okay, let's say 100X more because we paralyzed things. Now this workload can run 100X faster, right? That's assuming we do a good job in the scale, which is our IP. And if we can do that, now the computer resources that you have used, you have used them for 100 times less. So you have used 100 times more resources because you have more nodes, but because you go fast, you use them for less time, right? So if you multiply the two it's constant. So you can run and accelerate workload dramatically 10X, 100X for the same price. Even if we are not better in efficiency than competition, just having that was the magic, right? >> You know how Google founders originally had trouble raising money because who needs another search engine? Did you get from original, like when you started going to raise money, Amazon's got a database, so who needs another cloud database? Did you get that early on or was it just obvious Speiser and companies as well. >> Speiser is a little bit on the crazy side and ambitious and so Speiser is Speiser. And of course he had no doubt, but even him was saying Benoit, Thierry, Hadoop, right. Everyone is saying Hadoop is going to be the revolution. And you guys are betting actually against Hadoop because we told Speiser, Hadoop is a bad system, it's going to fail, but at the time everyone was so bullish about Hadoop, everyone was implementing Hadoop that it didn't look like it was going to fail and we were probably wrong. So there was a lot of skepticism about not leveraging Hadoop and not being an Hadoop. Okay, something being on top of Hadoop. That was number one. There was no cloud warehouse at the time we started. Redshift was not started. It was the pioneer somewhere when Snowflake was founded. So creating a data warehouse in the cloud sounded crazy to people. How am I going to move my data over there? And security and what about security, the cloud is not secure. So that was another... >> So you guys predated that Parexel move by... >> Yes. >> Okay, so that's interesting. And I thought when Redshift... I mean, Amazon announced Redshift, I was sure that Mike Speiser will come and say, guys it's too sad, but they beat you guys and they build something and actually it was the reverse. Mike Speiser was super excited and so it was interesting to me. >> Wow, that's amazing. 'Cause John Furrier and I, we were early with theCUBE. when theCUBE started it was like the beginning of Hadoop. And so we brought theCUBE to, I think it was the second Hadoop World and we was rubbing nickels together at the time. And I was so excited bring compute to storage and it made so much sense. But I remember and I won't say who it was, but an early Hadoop committer told me this is going to fail. And I'm like, what? And he started going age basis crap and all this stuff. And I was sad because I was so excited, but it turned out that you had the same (indistinct). >> Because of complexity. Okay, Hadoop failed for two reasons. One is because they decided that, oh, a lot of this database thing, you don't need transaction, you don't need SQL, you don't necessarily, you don't need to go fast. It'll be batch, normal real time interaction with data, no one needs that. >> Cheap storage. >> So a lot of compromise on the very important technology. And at the same time, extreme complexity and complexity for me was, where I was I knew that it was going to fail big time and we bet Snowflake on the failure of Hadoop indeed. >> And there was no cloud early on in Hadoop. >> And there was no cloud too. >> And that was what killed it. That was like... >> You're right. And the model that Hadoop had for data didn't work on block storage. Block storage is not as efficient as HGFS. So that was also another figure. >> Do you ever sit back and think about... So you think about how much money has poured in to separating compute from storage and cloud databases and you started it all. (interviewer laughing) >> Yeah. No, this is... >> Pretty amazing. >> Yeah. >> Right, so that's good. That means that you're onto a good idea, but a lot of people get confused that again, they think that you're a cloud data warehouse and you're not, I mean, you're much more than that. >> Yeah, I hate that. I have to say, because from day one we were not a cloud data warehouse. As I said, it was all about combining the big data, massive amount of unstructured data, petabytes stored as files. Okay, that's very important, store as files where it's very easy to drop data in the system without... Very low cost to combine with data warehouse, full multi statement transaction when people will tell you today, oh, now we are a data warehouse. They don't have multi statement transaction, right. So we had from day one multi statement transaction really efficient SQL. You could run your dashboard. So combining these two worlds was I think the crazy thing, that's the crazy innovation that Snowflake did initially. >> Yeah. >> And I know it's really easy to build data warehouse somewhere, because if you don't think about big data, petabytes, extremely structured data, you remove a lot of complexity. >> This is why Lisa, when you get excited about technology, but you always have to have a, somebody who really deeply understands technology to stink test it, all right so awesome. Thank you for sharing that story. >> Yeah. >> Fantastic. So over 5,900 customers now. I saw over 500 in the Forbes G2K, over almost 10,000 people here this year. If we think back to 2019, there was about what? Less than 2000 people. >> Yeah. >> What do you think is going to happen next year? >> I don't know. I don't like to think about next year. I mean, I always say, Snowflake is so exciting to me because it is like a TV show, right. Where you wait the next season and we have one season every year. So I'm really excited to know what is going to happen next year. And I don't want to project what I think will happen, but all these movements to the Snowflake being the platform for data application. I want to see what people are going to build on our platform. I mean, that's the excitement. >> Season 11 coming up. >> Yes. Season 11. Yes. >> No binge watching here. Benoit, it's been a pleasure to have you on the program. >> Thank you. >> Congratulations on incredible success, the momentum, the energy is contagious. We love it. (Benoit laughing) >> Thank you so much. >> Thank you. >> Bye bye. >> For Benoit Dageville and Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE's coverage of Snowflake Summit '22. Dave and I will be right back with a wrap. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
is coming to an end, Thank you, thank you. you guys started on Monday. And you can feel the future of the data cloud. and the marketplace where you So my question is, did you envision And that really has to be And that's the power of the and I'm not going to get So everything that you can the benefit of Snowflake to this data. My question to you is, the And that's the realization. And now you have people building clouds And of course, as I said, the last pillar, the feedback from the customer? Look at that smile. I was so busy everywhere. the feedback that you've had but imagine data that you didn't produce. announcements that you guys made. So and that's the motivation I can ask the same question And the elasticities that you can add like when you started at the time we started. So you guys predated and so it was interesting to me. And I was so excited you don't need to go fast. And at the same time, extreme complexity And there was no And that was what killed it. And the model that Hadoop had for data and you started it all. No, this is... but a lot of people get I have to say, because from day one because if you don't think about big data, This is why Lisa, when you I saw over 500 in the Forbes G2K, I mean, that's the excitement. Yes. to have you on the program. the momentum, the energy is contagious. Dave and I will be right back with a wrap.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike Speiser | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10X | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100X | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mike Speiser | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2012 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Benoit Dageville | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Benoit | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Thierry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | TITLE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
two aspects | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Python | TITLE | 0.99+ |
This week | DATE | 0.99+ |
one season | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two reasons | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hadoop | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snowflake Summit '22 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
this week | DATE | 0.99+ |
one platform | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Streamlit | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Speiser | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Java | TITLE | 0.99+ |
one platform | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one system | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one node | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Less than 2000 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Snowflake | EVENT | 0.98+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two node | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Hadoop | TITLE | 0.97+ |
over 5,900 customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
one single product | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first pillar | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Google Docs | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Multicloud | TITLE | 0.97+ |
over 500 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Parexel | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Denise Persson, Snowflake | Snowflake Summit 2022
>>Hello from the show floor in Las Vegas. This is the snowflake summit 22 at Caesar's forum. We've been live the last day and a half. Lisa Martin here with Dave ante covering a lot of ground. We're so excited to have the chief marketing officer at snowflake. Join us next, Denise Pearson. And welcome back to the cube. >>Thank you so much. So great to be here with you. So great to have you here at SEL meets as well. Thank >>You. That's unreal. Isn't it? Yeah. I mean, everybody's so excited to be face to face and you know, Lisa and I have been doing a few of these shows, but we, we hear the same thing over and over. It's like, oh, so good to be back, right? Yeah. >>Well, even in the keynote yesterday, when we got in, we saw a standing room only there were overflows. People are ready to hear from snowflake in person. And as we were, you were just talking with Frank, I think the 2019 show had less than 2000 people. And now here we are at close to 10,000, this step leap factor in terms of the audience and also the momentum of the company, the capabilities, lot of growth in that timeframe. Yeah, >>No. Yeah. Two, three years ago we were about 1800 people out to Hilton and San Francisco. We had about 40 partners attending this week were close to 10,000 at this year, almost 10,000 people online as well. And over over 200 partners here on the show floor, >>Right? 250 plus sessions, breakouts, keynotes, technical certifications, developer zone, a lot going on here. The buzz has been enormous from yesterday morning. It still is today. Talk about the theme of the event, the world of data collaboration. We've been talking a lot about data collaboration. Yeah. But from Snowflake's perspective, as Dave you've pointed out, that really seems like quite a differentiation of where snowflake is versus the guys in the root view mirror. Yeah. Number >>One of the very unique capabilities with snowflake is that the ability to share data with each other within your ecosystem. So you can both collaborate now on, on with your data, but also collaborate on building in a new business opportunities set together. So I think it's really a message that we, we, we fully fully own. It' really unique differentiator as well. So >>You used to talk about, you still talk about data sharing, but just kind of evolve the messaging to collaboration, explain why and, and how is that a wider scope and more appealing to the ecosystem in your >>Customers? I mean, data sharing is a terminology used for, for years and years, sounds from any data sharing it's about using, you know, FTP or, you know, APIs, those things. And we of course do it in a very, very different way where, where you do it without, you know, APIs so that you can share data with anyone in your ecosystem, without the data actually ever leaving, ever leaving your, your instance. So it's in a very different way. And also the fact that you can, again, you know, build applications together with other companies, you know, in your ecosystem. And it's a, it's a true collaboration around, you know, data in a way we've never seen before >>The other subtle change was data marketplace to marketplace. Why that change explain kind of what's behind that. >>Yeah. One of our big announcements here this week is around building native, you know, data apps and all snowflakes. Now you can both, you know, build the apps and you can distribute them and monetizing them in our marketplace. So in the past, you know, we only really had data sets within our marketplace within the data marketplace at that time. So you could now, you know, we can publish your data, you could monetize your data, but again, now moving forward, you will also be able to again, build apps and distribute them in the marketplace and also monetize them. And for Mon many startups, right? The, the big challenge is just a monetization piece as well. You build your product. You also need to find a way to, to both distribute and, and monetize it, an invoice for that product. And we solve all that for, for our customers. Now, >>A lot of customer growth, I saw Frank's slide yesterday over 5,900. I think you have 500 plus in the Forbes global 2000, a tremendous amount of growth in customers with a million plus ARR. Yes. >>Where >>Are the customers and the ecosystem in terms of that, that what you just described in the, going from the data marketplace to the marketplace are customers and, and the ecosystem influential in saying, Hey, snowflake, we need to go in this direction. >>Yeah. And also one key thing also with larger companies, they have their own marketplaces built, you know, snowflake as well. So you don't have to publish your, your, your data or app on our marketplace. The many of our larger companies, they're building those own marketplaces around themselves, you know, to distribute their data, you know, to their partners. So there are many ways you can, again, distribute and monetize their data. >>What are the marketing challenges? You, you started out kind of better data where simpler data warehouse, cloud data, warehouse, zero to snowflake was kind of the, the messaging and then the rise of the data cloud. And now it's all about applications. You're obviously building on top of that, but how, how have you, how do you think about that sort of messaging architecture going, you know, where you've come from and going forward? >>Yeah. Obviously the capabilities of the data cloud is kind of building and building it every day. And it's also a positioning that we can, you know, grow with as well. The big difference, you know, for us over the past two years is really that we are more and more really talking to the, to the business side, you know, of our, our customers that that's really where the demand is coming from. And we're truly, you know, with the data cloud, we're truly, you know, build bringing the business side and the it side together to solve these, you know, problems. And also, also together with all our partners as well. >>And I was just gonna ask you what, what's the partners role in the data cloud narrative? How do they help accomplish that? >>I would say, I mean, the data cloud is all about the partners it's, and also this event here, this event is not about, you know, snowflake it's about really our partners, you know, and our customers, you know, coming together, the data cloud is really it's. The foundation is of course, you know, the core capabilities, our platform, but then it's also all, all the data that is in there that other companies can access from our customers, but then all the applications and capabilities that are built, you know, by our partners and also our partners like the, you know, or the SI partners that are here, they are the ones, you know, doing the work, you know, with our customers, they are the ones that are, you know, migrating the data to, to snowflake and the data cloud and helping these companies build this new, you know, business model. So snowflake is a very, very partner first company. And the only thing I really care about this week here is that all this, you know, 200 partners here that they're gonna be tremendous successful if they're successful. That means that, you know, all our customers are successful as well. >>So how is your digital strategy evolving and how do you include the partners in that? >>Yeah, I mean, we learned so much over the past, you know, three, three years in regards to that. So, I mean, we all had to just accelerate our, the, the digital growth, you know, of our marketing capabilities and how to do that in a, with our, our partners. So with many of them, you know, we started developing this joint account based digital, you know, marketing program. Some, we just all had to adapt and innovate really fast, and we're gonna continue, of course, a lot of those motions as well. But at the same time, there's nothing like being out and meeting, you know, customers, you know, face to face. And what's also so important is the alignment we have with our local sales organization and our partners as well. So all these marketing programs that we develop in the fields, those are us again, opportunities cannot build those relationships as well. >>Can you talk about the sales marketing alignment at snowflake? I think it seems to be pretty strong, but we've talked a lot in the last day and a half about the retail data cloud healthcare life sciences, media finance. Talk to us about the marketing sales element, how marketing is facilitating, maybe from a campaign perspective, some of those big sales plays in the S yeah, >>Maybe both unique here. Our C Chris Dham, I think has been here early on the show. I mean, we work together for over six years now and we truly work as one, one team. We, we don't really even see the lines between sort of sales and marketings. We truly share exactly, you know, the same objectives every day. We share the same focus on, on putting our customers and our partners, you know, first, every day, his priorities, you know, are my priorities, you know, vice versa. And I think the biggest challenges we see often in some companies between sales and marketing, is that they're just shifting or it's different, you know, priorities. It's so important just to align the priorities and for us to making sure that our teams are all around the world now, or as aligned, you know, as Chris and I are as well, >>Couple other, yeah. Milestones or events come up, you're doing like, you're doing a worldwide tour and you got the dev conference in November, start with the worldwide tour. What's that all about? >>So we get little break near now, here for, for a couple of weeks. And then we're taking all the best of content here for, from, from summits and also all in our partners on a worldwide tour. We're starting in, in Asia, in August, and we're gonna target over 20 cities around the world. So, and again, I think this year, the challenge was many of our European customers and our customers in Asia. They couldn't make it. So we have smaller numbers, you know, coming from those regions. So it's more, more important than ever that we just come out to them, you know, instead, and bring this content in to them. >>Is that all face to face or at Lisa is all face to face. Is there a digital component as well? Yeah, >>It's actually gonna be all face to face and there will be some, some digital components as well. We're ending the tour in San Francisco. And that's also where we go doing all our winter announcements, you know, as well. And also our build our developer conference. That will be all virtual. The big, the global one will be all virtual at the same time, you know, from San Francisco. >>Okay. Am I confusing that with the November developer conference or >>The, that is, that is the conference, but it, that one will be virtual this year. Okay. >>So dev the build is all virtual. >>Yeah. Build be all virtual. And it's just, so we have that opportunity to reach as many people as we possibly can. >>And then is the, is this, is the intent to eventually bring them in to one place? >>Absolutely. I mean, I think the dev conference, the plan is to really take that around the world, you know, as well. We're seeing markets like Israel, for instance, there's a massive developer community that is, that is looking at snowflake right now. Markets like Indonesia, big developer segment as well. So I think it's not about, you know, having people come to us, it's about we, you know, coming out to them. So markets like Israel and Indonesia. And >>Will you also in future summits include a, a development component. You probably have something here. I just haven't seen it yet, but, but like the conference within the conference, or is it more, Hey, we want to cater to the t-shirt crowd, you know, separately, what do you, yeah, >>I think we cater to them separately. And I said again, that we it's really about taking our content, you know, out, out to them. And when we're talking about the developer audience, we're talking about hundreds and thousands of people and they can't physically, you know, come here. So our plan is really to come out and meet them where they are. How >>Did you make the decision to do this summit fourth annual in person? I'm sure the attendance figures are probably blowing your mind, but that's a, that's a big decision and that's a challenging decision to make. How did they go about doing that? >>I think, I think if there was one thing we've learned during the past three years, it's really about that. Adaptability is the new superpower, you know, of bus business. So of course we've had to adapt, you know, you know, every month. And of course, even two months ago, we were not sure, you know, how, how many people that will be able to come here today, but we're incredibly happy. Were they, were they, were they with the number of people that, you know, came here and yeah, we're already storing planning for next year. >>I mean, it definitely must have exceeded your expectations. Is that fair? Or >>We set expectations high. Yeah. Okay. But again, it's that unknown that we all had to deal with, you know, every day. And I think we're gonna continue to have to, to live with that. >>Yeah. Well, this is, yeah, this is one of the largest shows we've done. Yeah. SIM it's a reinvent, obviously different. That was last year, but this year, this is the biggest event I think we've been to, and we've been to some big brand events, so yeah. Yeah. Punching above the weight as usual. >>Yeah. And again, I wanna just give a big shout out to our whole, you know, partner ecosystem, you know, here, because again, this is very much of an ecosystem, you know, partner you in a conference and it's really all our 200 plus partners here making this conference, what it is. I mean, today >>It's remarkable to pace at which you've been able to grow the ecosystem, but why do you think that is? What's the secret there? >>I think we fully understand that we don't solve all the problems ourselves, you know, for, for our customers. It's really an ecosystem of, of products and services that solve those problems and customers. They are looking for vendors that partner well with others. They're looking for vendors that integrate well, you know, with each other. So we always have an outside in view on things and that's something we challenge ourselves every morning. We wake up, how do we put ourselves in the customer's shoes in terms of, of, of their needs and their problems and how to solve those? We don't solve them alone. We, we solve them with these 200 plus in apart. Make >>It sound so simple. >>Speaking of challenges, you have something called the startup challenge. That's in its second annual >>Yes. Tomorrow we're kicking off the, the final of the second annual startup challenge. We have three finalists here, three very different, you know, companies. And we had a couple hundred applications this year and we have everything from a company that makes AI and ML more accessible to a company, focus on, you know, retail, you know, analytics. It's gonna be very exciting tomorrow, big price for the winner. The winner is going to win a million dollar of investment from, from snowflake ventures. So >>Very exciting. It's a nice incentive. It is a nice incentive, >>Very nice incentive. And also all the exposure you will get as well. We will put a lot of our marketing support, you know, behind this companies as well. >>Excellent. >>And now the data driver awards program, we've had a couple of data drivers on the program in the last day >>And a half. Yes. We announced to know those winners as well, you know, early in the week. So a lot of recognition for both our customers, but also we're gonna see, you know, the next interesting companies here to watch tomorrow during the startup challenge, you >>Get a little bit of something for everybody here, right? I mean the, the, the, the partner awards, right? These other little side opportunities for ecosystem to get recognition, sometimes funding it's >>Yeah. Everyone wants to be recognized, you know, for the great work they're doing. So, yeah. Yeah. >>So what's next for marketing, obviously, a break and then you start the, the road show. >>So of course yesterday we made an number of very, very large in announcements. Many of those, you know, we've been working on for years here at snowflake, like Unior, you know, for instance has been probably three years, you know, in the making. So our goal now is to take all those announcements to every customer around the world, both through, you know, local events really starting this week, and then also the world tour this fall. And it's gonna be a big, big focus on the developer segments. Obviously what our most exciting announcements is, the native apps, you know, capabilities. And that finally, you know, we can bring the work, you know, to the data and not again, taking the data to the work. And as you know, our mission has really been around breaking down the data silos. Cause those have been the biggest, you know, challenges companies have faced. That's really, what's been standing in the way for customers to become you a data Rav, and now bringing the work to the data from a developer's standpoint is gonna break down even further, those silos. So, >>Yeah. And it's good physics. >>Yeah. It good physics. Yeah. >>Yeah. Tremendous opportunity. Congratulations on a great successful event. It's not even done yet, but obviously we've seen so much success. Great news coming out. We'll be excited to be hearing some of the outcomes of the road show and the developer conference coming up in the fall. We appreciate your insights, your time and for having the cube here at the summit. >>Thank you for being here. Thank you. Thanks for having >>Me, our pleasure for Denise Pearson and Dave Valante I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the cubes coverage of snowflake summit 22 live from Las Vegas, Dave and I will be back after a short break.
SUMMARY :
This is the snowflake summit 22 at Caesar's forum. So great to have you here at SEL meets as well. I mean, everybody's so excited to be face to face and you know, Lisa and I have been doing you were just talking with Frank, I think the 2019 show had less than 2000 people. here on the show floor, Talk about the theme of the event, the world of data collaboration. So you can both collaborate And also the fact that you can, again, you know, build applications together with Why that change explain kind the past, you know, we only really had data sets within our marketplace within the I think you have 500 plus in the Forbes global 2000, Are the customers and the ecosystem in terms of that, that what you just described in the, around themselves, you know, to distribute their data, you know, to their partners. You, you started out kind of better data where simpler data warehouse, And it's also a positioning that we can, you know, grow with as well. you know, doing the work, you know, with our customers, they are the ones that are, you know, migrating the data to, So with many of them, you know, we started developing this joint account based Can you talk about the sales marketing alignment at snowflake? our partners, you know, first, every day, his priorities, you know, the dev conference in November, start with the worldwide tour. So we have smaller numbers, you know, coming from those regions. Is that all face to face or at Lisa is all face to face. you know, as well. The, that is, that is the conference, but it, that one will be virtual this year. And it's just, so we have that opportunity to reach as many people So I think it's not about, you know, having people come to us, or is it more, Hey, we want to cater to the t-shirt crowd, you know, separately, you know, out, out to them. Did you make the decision to do this summit fourth annual in person? Adaptability is the new superpower, you know, of bus business. I mean, it definitely must have exceeded your expectations. it's that unknown that we all had to deal with, you know, Punching above the weight as usual. you know, here, because again, this is very much of an ecosystem, you know, partner you in a conference and you know, for, for our customers. Speaking of challenges, you have something called the startup challenge. focus on, you know, retail, you know, analytics. It's a nice incentive. And also all the exposure you will get as well. gonna see, you know, the next interesting companies here to watch tomorrow Yeah. And that finally, you know, we can bring the work, Yeah. some of the outcomes of the road show and the developer conference coming up in the fall. Thank you for being here. Me, our pleasure for Denise Pearson and Dave Valante I'm Lisa Martin.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Denise Pearson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Denise Persson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
November | DATE | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
yesterday morning | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
200 partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
August | DATE | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
200 plus partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
this week | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
500 plus | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over six years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.98+ |
this fall | DATE | 0.98+ |
two months ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
three years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
200 plus | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Israel | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Hilton | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
less than 2000 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second annual | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three finalists | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Unior | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Snowflake Summit 2022 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Snowflake | EVENT | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
over 20 cities | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Two | DATE | 0.96+ |
about 40 partners | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Chris Dham | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Indonesia | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
almost 10,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
about 1800 people | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one team | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first company | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
250 plus sessions | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
over over 200 partners | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
fourth annual | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
a million dollar | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
one key thing | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
past two years | DATE | 0.79+ |
a million plus | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Tony Baer, dbInsight | MongoDB World 2022
>>Welcome back to the big apple, everybody. The Cube's continuous coverage here of MongoDB world 2022. We're at the new Javet center. It's it's quite nice. It was built during the pandemic. I believe on top of a former bus terminal. I'm told by our next guest Tony bear, who's the principal at DB insight of data and database expert, longtime analyst, Tony. Good to see you. Thanks for coming >>On. Thanks >>For having us. You face to face >>And welcome to New York. >>Yeah. Right. >>New York is open for business. >>So, yeah. And actually, you know, it's interesting. We've been doing a lot of these events lately and, and especially the ones in Vegas, it's the first time everybody's been out, you know, face to face, not so much here, you know, people have been out and about a lot of masks >>In, >>In New York city, but, but it's good. And, and this new venue is fantastic >>Much nicer than the old Javits. >>Yeah. And I would say maybe 3000 people here. >>Yeah. Probably, but I think like most conferences right now are kind of, they're going through like a slow ramp up. And like for instance, you know, sapphires had maybe about one third, their normal turnout. So I think that you're saying like one third to one half seems to be the norm right now are still figuring out how we're, how and where we're gonna get back together. Yeah. >>I think that's about right. And, and I, but I do think that that in most of the cases that we've seen, it's exceeded people's expectations at tenants, but anyway sure. Let's talk about Mongo, very interesting company. You know, we've been kind of been watching their progression from just sort of document database and all the features and functions they're adding, you just published a piece this morning in venture beat is time for Mongo to get into analytics. Yes. You know? Yes. One of your favorite topics. Well, can they expand analytics? They seem to be doing that. Let's dig into it. Well, >>They're taking, they've been taking slow. They've been taking baby steps and there's good reason for that because first thing is an operational database. The last thing you wanna do is slow it down with very complex analytics. On the other hand, there's huge value to be had if you would, if you could, you know, turn, let's say a smart, if you can turn, let's say an operational database or a transaction database into a smart transaction database. In other words, for instance, you know, let's say if you're, you're, you're doing, you know, an eCommerce site and a customer has made an order, that's basically been out of the norm. Whether it be like, you know, good or bad, it would be nice. Basically, if at that point you could then have a next best action, which is where analytics comes in. But it's a very lightweight form of analytics. It's not gonna, it's actually, I think probably the best metaphor for this is real time credit scoring. It's not that they're doing your scoring you in real time. It's that the model has been computed offline so that when you come on in real time, it can make a smart decision. >>Got it. Okay. So, and I think it was your article where I, I wrote down some examples. Sure. Operational, you know, use cases, patient data. There's certainly retail. We had Forbes on earlier, right? Obviously, so very wide range of, of use cases for operational will, will Mongo, essentially, in your view, is it positioned to replace traditional R D BMS? >>Well, okay. That's a long that's, that's much, it's >>Sort of a loaded question, but >>That's, that's a very loaded question. I think that for certain cases, I think it will replace R D BMS, but I still, I mean, where I, where I depart from Mongo is I do not believe that they're going to replace all R D D BMSs. I think, for instance, like when you're doing financial transactions, you know, the world has been used to table, you know, you know, columns and rows and tables. That's, it's a natural form for something that's very structured like that. On the other hand, when you take a look, let's say OT data, or you're taking a look at home listings that tends to more naturally represent itself as documents. And so there's a, so it's kind of like documents are the way that let's say you normally see the world. Relational is the way that you would structure the world. >>Okay. Well, I like that. So, but I mean, in the early days, obviously, and even to this day, it's like the target for Mongo has been Oracle. Yeah. Right, right. And so, and then, you know, you talk to a lot of Oracle customers as do I sure. And they are running the most mission, critical applications in the world, and it's like banking and financial and so many. And, and, and, you know, they've kind of carved out that space, but are we, should we be rethinking the definition of, of mission critical? Is that changing? >>Well, number one, I think what we've traditionally associated mission critical systems with is our financial transaction systems and to a less, and also let's say systems that schedule operations. But the fact is there are many forms of operations where for instance, let's say you're in a social network, do you need to have that very latest update? Or, you know, basically, can you go off, let's say like, you know, a server that's eventually consistent. In other words, the, do you absolutely have, you know, it's just like when you go on Twitter, do you naturally see all the latest tweets? It's not the system's not gonna crash for that reason. Whereas let's say if you're doing it, you know, let's say an ATM banking ATM system, that system better be current. So I think there's a delineation. The fact is, is that in a social network, arguably that operational system is mission critical, but it's mission critical in a different way from a, you know, from, let's say a banking system. >>So coming back to this idea of, of this hybrid, I think, you know, I think Gartner calls it H tab hybrid, transactional analytics >>Is changed by >>The minute, right. I mean, you mentioned that in, in your article, but basically it's bringing analytics to transactions bringing those, those roles together. Right. Right. And you're saying with Mongo, it's, it's lightweight now take, you use two other examples in your article, my SQL heat wave. Right. I think you had a Google example as well, DB, those are, you're saying much, much heavier analytics, is that correct? Or >>I we'll put it this way. I think they're because they're coming from a relational background. And because they also are coming from companies that already have, you know, analytic database or data warehouses, if you will, that their analytic, you know, capabilities are gonna be much more fully rounded than what Mongo has at this point. It's not a criticism of a Mongo MongoDB per >>Per, is that by design though? Or ne not necessarily. Is that a function of maturity? >>I think it's function of maturity. Oh, okay. I mean, look, to a certain extent, it's also a function of design in terms of that the document model is a little, it's not impossible to basically model it for analytics, but it takes more, you know, transformation to, to decide which, you know, let's say field in that document is gonna be a column. >>Now, the big thing about some of these other, these hybrid systems is, is eliminating the need for two databases, right? Eliminating the need for, you know, complex ETL. Is, is that a value proposition that will emerge with, with Mongo in your view? >>You know, I, I mean, put it this way. I think that if you take a look at how they've, how Mongo is basically has added more function to its operations, someone talking about analytics here, for instance, adding streaming, you know, adding, adding, search, adding time series, that's a matter of like where they've eliminated the need to do, you know, transformation ETL, but that's not for analytics per se for analytics. I think through, you know, I mean through replication, there's still gonna be some transformation in terms of turning, let's say data, that's, that's formed in a document into something that's represented by columns. There is a form of transformation, you know, so that said, and Mongo is already, you know, it has some NA you know, nascent capability there, but it's all, but this is still like at a rev 1.0 level, you know, I expect a lot more >>Of so refin you, how Amazon says in the fullness of time, all workloads will be in the cloud. And we could certainly debate that. What do we mean by cloud? So, but there's a sort of analog for Mongo that I'll ask you in the fullness of time, will Mongo be in a position to replace data warehouses or data lakes? No. Or, or, or, and we know the answer is no. So that's of course, yeah. But are these two worlds on a quasi collision course? I think they >>More on a convergence course or the collision course, because number one is I said, the first principle and operational database is the last thing you wanna do is slow it down. And to do all this complex modeling that let's say that you would do in a data bricks, or very complex analytics that you would do in a snowflake that is going to get, you know, you know, no matter how much you partition the load, you know, in Atlas, and yes, you can have separate nodes. The fact is you really do not wanna burden the operational database with that. And that's not what it's meant for, but what it is meant for is, you know, can I make a smart decision on the spot? In other words, kinda like close the loop on that. And so therefore there's a, a form of lightweight analytic that you can perform in there. And actually that's also the same principle, you know, on which let's say for instance, you know, my SQL heat wave and Allo DBR based on, they're not, they're predicated on, they're not meant to replace, you know, whether it be exit data or big query, the idea there is to do more of the lightweight stuff, you know, and keep the database, you know, keep the operations, you know, >>Operating. And, but from a practitioner's standpoint, I, I, I can and should isolate you're saying that node, right. That's what they'll do. Sure. How does that affect cuz my understanding is that that the Mon Mongo specifically, but I think document databases generally will have a primary node. Right? And then you can set up secondary nodes, which then you have to think about availability, but, but would that analytic node be sort of fenced off? Is that part of the >>Well, that's actually what they're, they've already, I mean, they already laid the groundwork for it last year, by saying that you can set up separate nodes and dedicate them to analytics and what they've >>As, as a primary, >>Right? Yes, yes. For analytics and what they've added, what they're a, what they are adding this year is the fact to say like that separate node does not have to be the same instance class, you know, as, as, as, as the, >>What, what does that mean? Explain >>That in other words, it's a, you know, you could have BA you know, for instance, you could have a node for operations, that's basically very eye ops intensive, whereas you could have a node let's say for analytics that might be more compute intensive or, or more he, or, or more heavily, you know, configured with, with memory per se. And so the idea here is you can tailor in a node to the workload. So that's, you know what they're saying with, you know, and I forget what they're calling it, but the idea that you can have a different type, you can specify a different type of node, a different type of instance for the analytic node, I think is, you know, is a major step forward >>And that, and that that's enabled by the cloud and architecture. >>Of course. Yes. I mean, we're separating, compute from data is, is, is the starter. And so yeah. Then at that point you can then start to, you know, you know, to go less vanilla. I think, you know, the re you know, the, you know, the, I guess the fruition of this is going to be when they say, okay, you can run your, let's say your operational nodes, you know, dedicated, but we'll let you run your analytic nodes serverless. Can't do it yet, but I've gotta believe that's on the roadmap. >>Yeah. So seq brings a lot of overhead. So you get MQL, but now square this circle for me, cuz now you got Mago talking sequel. >>They had to start doing that some time. I mean, and I it's been a court take I've had from them from the, from the get go, which I said, I understand that you're looking at this as an alternative to SQL and that's perfectly valid, but don't deny the validity of SQL or the reason why we, you know, we need it. The fact is that you have, okay, the number, you know, according to Ty index, JavaScript is the seventh, most popular language. Most SQL follows closely behind at the ninth, most popular language you don't want to cl. And the fact is those people exist in the enterprise and they're, and they're disproportionately concentrated in analytics. I mean, you know, it's getting a little less, so now we're seeing like, you know, basically, you know, Python, the programmatic, but still, you know, a lot of sequel expertise there. It does not make, it makes no sense for Mongo to, to, to ignore or to overlook that audience. I think now they're, you know, you know, they're taking baby steps to start, you know, reaching out to them. >>It's interesting. You see it going both ways. See Oracle announces a Mongo, DB, Mongo. I mean, it's just convergence. You called it not, I love collisions, you know, >>I know it's like, because you thrive on drama and I thrive on can't. We all love each other, but you know, act. But the thing is actually, I've been, I wrote about this. I forget when I think it was like 2014 or 2016. It's when we, I was noticed I was noting basically the, you know, the rise of all these specialized databases and probably Amazon, you know, AWS is probably the best exemplar of that. I've got 15 or 16 or however, number of databases and they're all dedicated purpose. Right. But I also was, you know, basically saw that inevitably there was gonna be some overlap. It's not that all databases were gonna become one and the same we're gonna be, we're gonna become back into like the, you know, into a pan G continent or something like that. But that you're gonna have a relational database that can do JSON and, and a, and a document database that can do relational. I mean, you know, it's, to me, that's a no brainer. >>So I asked Andy Ja one time, I'd love to get your take on this, about those, you know, multiple data stores at the time. They probably had a thousand. I think they're probably up to 15 now, right? Different APIs, different S et cetera. And his response. I said, why don't you make it easier for, for customers and maybe build an abstraction or converge these? And he said, well, it's by design. What if you buy this? And, and what your thoughts are, cuz I, you know, he's a pretty straight shooter. Yeah. It's by design because it allows us as the market moves, we can move with it. And if we, if we give developers access to those low level primitives and APIs, then they can move with, with at market speed. Right. And so that again, by design, now we heard certainly Mongo poo pooing that today they didn't mention, they didn't call out Amazon. Yeah. Oracle has no compunction about specifically calling out Amazon. They do it all the time. What do you make of that? Can't Amazon have its cake and eat it too. In other words, extend some of the functionality of those specific databases without going to the Swiss army. >>I I'll put it this way. You, you kind of tapped in you're, you're sort of like, you know, killing me softly with your song there, which is that, you know, I was actually kind of went on a rant about this, actually know in, you know, come, you know, you know, my year ahead sort of out predictions. And I said, look, cloud folks, it's great that you're making individual SAS, you know, products easy to use. But now that I have to mix and match SAS products, you know, the burden of integration is on my shoulders. Start making my life easier. I think a good, you know, a good example of this would be, you know, for instance, you could take something like, you know, let's say like a Google big query. There's no reason why I can't have a piece of that that might, you know, might be paired, say, you know, say with span or something like that. >>The idea being is that if we're all working off a common, you know, common storage, we, you know, it's in cloud native, we can separate the computer engines. It means that we can use the right engine for the right part of the task. And the thing is that maybe, you know, myself as a consumer, I should not have to be choosing between big query and span. But the thing is, I should be able to say, look, I want to, you know, globally distribute database, but I also wanna do some analytics and therefore behind the scenes, you know, new microservices, it could connect the two wouldn't >>Microsoft synapse be an example of doing that. >>It should be an example. I wish I, I would love to hear more from Microsoft about this. They've been radio silent for about the past two or three years in data. You hardly hear about it, but synapse is actually those actually one of the ideas I had in mind now keep in mind that with synapse, you're not talking about, let's say, you know, I mean, it's, it's obviously a sequel data warehouse. It's not pure spark. It's basically their, it was their curated version of spark, but that's fine. But again, I would love to hear Microsoft talk more about that. They've been very quiet. >>Yeah. You, you, the intent is there to >>Simplify >>It exactly. And create an abstraction. Exactly. Yeah. They have been quiet about it. Yeah. Yeah. You would expect that, that maybe they're still trying to figure it out. So what's your prognosis from Mongo? I mean, since this company IP, you know, usually I, I tell and I tell everybody this, especially my kids, like don't buy a stock at IPO. You'll always get a better chance at a cheaper price to buy it. Yeah. And even though that was true with Mongo, you didn't have a big window. No. Like you did, for instance, with, with Facebook, certainly that's been the case with snowflake and sure. Alibaba, I mean, I name a zillion style was almost universal. Yeah. But, but since that, that, that first, you know, few months, period, this, this company has been on a roll. Right. And it, it obviously has been some volatility, but the execution has been outstanding. >>No question about that. I mean, the thing is, look what I, what I, and I'm just gonna talk on the product side on the sales side. Yeah. But on the product side, from the get go, they made a product that was easy for developers. Whereas let's say someone's giving an example, for instance, Cosmo CB, where to do certain operations. They had to go through multiple services in, you know, including Azure portal with Atlas, it's all within Atlas. So they've really, it's been kinda like design thinking from the start initially with, with the core Mongo DB, you know, you, the on premise, both this predates Atlas, I mean, part of it was that they were coming with a language that developers knew was just Javas script. The construct that they knew, which was JS on. So they started with that home core advantage, but they weren't the only ones doing that. But they did it with tooling that was very intuitive to developers that met developers, where they lived and what I give them, you know, then additional credit for is that when they went to the cloud and it wasn't an immediate thing, Atlas was not an overnight success, but they employed that same design thinking to Atlas, they made Atlas a good cloud experience. They didn't just do a lift and shift the cloud. And so that's why today basically like five or six years later, Atlas's most of their business. >>Yeah. It's what, 60% of the business now. Yeah. And then Dave, on the, on the earning scholar, maybe it wasn't Dave and somebody else in response to question said, yeah, ultimately this is the future will be be 90% of the business. I'm not gonna predict when. So my, my question is, okay, so let's call that the midterm midterm ATLA is gonna be 90% of the business with some exceptions that people just won't move to the cloud. What's next is the edge. A new opportunity is Mongo architecturally suited for the, I mean, it's certainly suited for the right, the home Depot store. Sure. You know, at the edge. Yeah. If you, if you consider that edge, which I guess it is form of edge, but how about the far edge EVs cell towers, you know, far side, real time, AI inferencing, what's the requirement there, can Mongo fit there? Any thoughts >>On that? I think the AI and the inferencing stuff is interesting. It's something which really Mongo has not tackled yet. I think we take the same principle, which is the lightweight stuff. In other words, you'll say, do let's say a classification or a prediction or some sort of prescriptive action in other words, where you're not doing some convolution, neural networking and trying to do like, you know, text, text to voice or, or, or vice versa. Well, you're not trying to do all that really fancy stuff. I think that's, you know, if you're keeping it SIM you know, kinda like the kiss principle, I think that's very much within Mongo's future. I think with the realm they have, they basically have the infrastructure to go out to the edge. I think with the fact that they've embraced GraphQL has also made them a lot more extensible. So I think they certainly do have, you know, I, I do see the edge as being, you know, you know, in, in, you know, in their, in their pathway. I do see basically lightweight analytics and lightweight, let's say machine learning definitely in their >>Future. And, but, and they would, would you agree that they're in a better position to tap that opportunity than say a snowflake or an Oracle now maybe M and a can change that. R D can maybe change that, but fundamentally from an architectural standpoint yeah. Are they in a better position? >>Good question. I think that that Mongo snowflake by virtual fact, I mean that they've been all, you know, all cloud start off with, I think makes it more difficult, not impossible to move out to the edge, but it means that, and I, and know, and I, and I said, they're really starting to making some tentative moves in that direction. I'm looking forward to next week to, you know, seeing what, you know, hearing what we're gonna, what they're gonna be saying about that. But I do think, right. You know, you know, to answer your question directly, I'd say like right now, I'd say Mongo probably has a, you know, has a head start there. >>I'm losing track of time. I could go forever with you. Tony bear DB insight with tons of insights. Thanks so much for coming back with. >>It's only one insight insight, Dave. Good to see you again. All >>Right. Good to see you. Thank you. Okay. Keep it right there. Right back at the Java center, Mongo DB world 2022, you're watching the cube.
SUMMARY :
We're at the new Javet center. You face to face and especially the ones in Vegas, it's the first time everybody's been out, you know, And, and this new venue is fantastic And like for instance, you know, sapphires had maybe about one third, their normal turnout. you just published a piece this morning in venture beat is time for Mongo It's that the model has been computed offline so that when you come on in Operational, you know, use cases, patient data. That's a long that's, that's much, it's transactions, you know, the world has been used to table, you know, you know, columns and rows and and then, you know, you talk to a lot of Oracle customers as do I sure. you know, it's just like when you go on Twitter, do you naturally see all the latest tweets? I mean, you mentioned that in, in your article, but basically it's bringing analytics to transactions bringing are coming from companies that already have, you know, analytic database or data warehouses, Per, is that by design though? but it takes more, you know, transformation to, to decide which, you know, Eliminating the need for, you know, complex ETL. I think through, you know, I mean through replication, there's still gonna be some transformation in terms of turning, but there's a sort of analog for Mongo that I'll ask you in the fullness of time, And actually that's also the same principle, you know, on which let's say for instance, And then you can set up secondary nodes, which then you have to think about availability, the fact to say like that separate node does not have to be the same instance class, you know, for the analytic node, I think is, you know, is a major step forward you know, the re you know, the, you know, the, I guess the fruition of this is going to be when they but now square this circle for me, cuz now you got Mago talking sequel. I think now they're, you know, you know, they're taking baby steps to start, you know, reaching out to them. You called it not, I love collisions, you know, I mean, you know, it's, to me, that's a no brainer. I said, why don't you make it easier for, for customers and maybe build an abstraction or converge these? I think a good, you know, a good example of this would be, you know, for instance, you could take something But the thing is, I should be able to say, look, I want to, you know, globally distribute database, let's say, you know, I mean, it's, it's obviously a sequel data warehouse. I mean, since this company IP, you know, usually I, I tell and I tell everybody this, to developers that met developers, where they lived and what I give them, you know, but how about the far edge EVs cell towers, you know, you know, you know, in, in, you know, in their, in their pathway. And, but, and they would, would you agree that they're in a better position to tap that opportunity I mean that they've been all, you know, all cloud start off with, I could go forever with you. Good to see you again. Right back at the Java center, Mongo DB
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Teresa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Comcast | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Khalid Al Rumaihi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Phil Soren | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bahrain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Volante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
TIBCO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
General Electric | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Teresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tony | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pega | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Khalid | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tony Baer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
$100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sunnyvale | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
March 2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mongo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
46% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Todd Nielsen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July | DATE | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Atlas | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bahrain Economic Development Board | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kuwait | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Malta | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Hong Kong | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2012 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Gulf Cooperation Council | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
So Cal | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Abdul Razack, Google & Vadim Supitskiy, Forbes | MongoDB World 2022
(upbeat music) >> Welcome back to New York City everybody. You're watching theCUBE's coverage of MongoDB World 2022. My name is Dave Vellante. Pretty good attendance here. I'd say over 3000 people, great buzz, a lot of really technical sessions. There's an executive session going on. There's a financial analyst session. So a lot of diversity in this attendee base. Vadim Supitskiy is here. He's the CTO of Forbes and Abdul Razack is the vice president of Solution Engineering at Google. Gents, thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Thanks Dave. >> Happy to be here. >> So, Forbes, very interesting business. I'm interested in what occurred during the pandemic for you guys. Right? Everybody went digital. Obviously you guys have a tremendous brand. We all, in the business world reaped from it, but what happened during the isolation era? What happened to your business? >> Yeah, so we've been innovating and going through digital transformation for years, since we launched our website probably 25 years ago. >> But during the pandemic, because of our coverage, our foresight to create a breaking news team, our audiences and readership really skyrocketed. >> Really? >> Yeah, and at that point, we were very happy and really lucky to be in Google Cloud and MongoDB Atlas. So when the audiences went up, we didn't feel any impact, right? Our environments auto-scaled and our users didn't experience any issues at all. So we were able to focus on innovation, our users loyalty and really building cool products. So we were very lucky and happy to be in Google Cloud and MongoDB Atlas. >> So Abdul, the solution and the title you provided, obviously worked. How did you guys end up getting together? What was that like? >> Yeah, I mean, like Vadim said, maybe there's a little bit of the right place at the right time in this case, but you can see the need for digital transformation and the pandemic really accelerated that. And like Vadim said, primarily Forbes wanted to focus on innovation and customer loyalty and the way that comes to bear, is that you have a technology platform that can serve those needs. Right? Whether it is through unique applications that can be delivered, the ability for developers to build those applications quickly and seamlessly and then remove the intangibles of scalability, performance, latency, and things of that nature. So, you can see this all coming together in this scenario. >> So as consumers, we see the website, we read online, maybe sometimes in the laptop, mostly on mobile. What is it that we don't see? I mean, the apps that Abdul talked about, community. What else is there? Paint a picture of that for us. >> Yeah. There is a lot going on behind the scene. Right? So focusing on audience, building communities, but also what it allowed us to do while everything was working well, we were scaling up. Right? We were able to focus on a lot of innovation. And one of those was first-party data platform that we built. We call it Forbes One. And that's in the center of everything that we do at Forbes right now. Right? So it allows us, one, to connect our partners, advertising partners with the audiences that they're looking to engage and to connect with. And then we are growing our consumer business as well and what that allows us to do is target the right products at the right time, to the right people, on the web website and our domain. So, that's just one of the examples that we've built our full first-party data platform on these technologies and we now know our customers so well that we are able to provide them with what they want. >> So the first-party data platform is what? A self-serve for advertiser, so they can identify? >> Not just advertisers. So it's in the center of everything. So advertiser comes in, we provide the segments and users that they want to reach. Now, we are creating products as well, building cool, innovative products and offering our journalism and everything there to our readers and we are able to connect them to the right audiences at the right time, as well as personalization. Right? You come onto the website, you want to read what you want to read. So we able to create that as well, using machine learning and AI. >> So a product, it might be a data product or it might be a content product? >> It could be a data product. It could be like just personalization or something like that. It could be newsletter. Right? It could be a stand-alone product, like investing product. So, there is a lot going on there, but we want to offer the right ones at the right time, to the right audiences and building that platform has allowed us to do that. >> Okay. Now Google's got great tech. What's the tech behind all this? >> Yeah. So when Vadim talked about segmenting to personalize something that is relevant to you and providing recommendations to you. Right? And all that is based on machine learning, AI technology. The fact that Vadim has all the data curated in a in a first-party data platform gives the ability to create a seamless profile. Right? You could be interested in a couple of products. Right? And then the underlying technology can tailor that to bring what is it that you're looking for at the right place at the right time. Right? So those are recommendations, things of that nature that's all powered by AI and machine learning technology. >> So it's running on Mongo, and then you're bringing in Google AI and machine intelligence tools? Can you double click on that? >> Yeah. It's basically a combination of both, using both platform to the deploy it and we embrace Cloud. Right? So we using all the Cloud native technologies. Right? We didn't want to just lift and shift. We wanted to make sure we do it right. And we focused on automation, even if we had to take a step back, we knew that automating things was a key for us. So yes, it's been really successful, but also really informative for us to use the right tools for the job. >> And you had prior experience with Mongo, or? >> We did. >> What's your journey been like there? >> Yeah, we actually were one of the first clients of Mongo. I think we were number 11 at that time. >> 10gen. >> Yes. It was. >> We remember. >> Many years ago it was MongoDB one, right? >> Yeah. >> And at that time we we introduced contributor network for us and our audiences were scaling as well. And we used Out-of-the-Box WordPress as our publishing platform, which couldn't scale. So we had to rethink and figure out, "Alright, so what do we do?" We compared couple of no SQL databases and Mongo was a winner because they checked all the boxes and developers loved it right away. Right? They're like, "All right, this is so much faster to develop on. It's just a great tool for the job going from SQL to, to no SQL". And we scaled and we never looked back. And then obviously Atlas came, so there are kind of two inflection points here. One switch into no SQL and two going away from managing databases. Like we don't want to be in that business. Right? Updates, patches, all of that, that we had to do manually, over-provision in our environments and kind of wasteful. So being on Atlas, that was a second kind of inflection point for us, which opened it up for us to do even more innovation and move faster. >> Okay. And you're happy about this partnership, despite, I mean, you partner with Mongo obviously, Google has its own databases, that's just the nature of the world we live in, isn't it? >> No and fundamentally like that, we always believe that customer choice is the primary notion. Right? I mean, and Google Cloud platform is more of a platform and the ecosystem is critical to that. Right? It's imperative. So, like Vadim said, the combination of Google and Mongo provides a truly Cloud native platform that can serve the needs for years to come, rather than from looking at it from a legacy perspective. And that's the way we look at it. Right? I mean, there is choices all the time and sometimes it's competition. >> Yeah. Yeah. And you're still selling a lot of compute and storage and machine intelligence, so machine learning. This morning in the keynotes, we heard a lot about a lot of different capabilities. We've certainly watched Mongo evolve its platform over the last half a decade or more really. But you've mentioned the developers loved it. Right? As Mongo evolves its platform, is there trade off from a developer simplicity standpoint? Are they able to preserve that from your perspective? >> I think with Atlas, it actually makes it easier now. So when they need to create an environment, they can do it on the fly. When they need to test something, also things available to them right away. So it actually, in general, as the platform becomes more mature and more stable, which is very important, but at the same time, the flexibility remains for development and for creation of environments and things like that. So we've been pretty happy with how it transitioned, to being a more mature platform. >> Did the move to Google Cloud and Atlas change the way that you're able to deliver high availability versus what you were doing when you were self-managing? Can you talk about that a little bit? >> Yeah, absolutely. We were in a data center, so kind of one location and moving to MongoDB Atlas and Google Cloud, now we're multi region. Right? So we have a full DR strategy and we feel a lot more secure and we feel very confident that anything that happens, we can scale, we can fail over. So absolutely, this helps us a lot. And the feature that was introduced probably a few years ago to auto scale MongoDB environments as well, that has been really key for us, so we can sleep well. >> Meaning you can scale while you sleep. >> Right, exactly. Exactly. >> Yeah. Plus the other part is you don't size for peak. right? You size as you grow, and then you, you have that elasticity built in. Right? That it is the nature. And then Mongo is available on multiple Google Cloud regions. So as you expand, you don't worry about all the plumbing that you need to do and things of that nature. >> They asked us serverless this morning. >> Yeah. >> How does that affect what you guys are doing together and what are your thoughts from Google's perspective and then of course, from Forbes? >> And that's the trend that we see constantly. Right? Serverless really decouples the tie to the VMs. Right? And so it makes it much more easier to provide the elasticity and have function calls across. Right? Function as a service and things of that nature. Right? So we see a lot of promise in that. Right? We do that even within our own products and we see that giving the ability to decompose and recompose applications and would love to hear how you're leveraging that. Right? >> Yeah. We fully embrace serverless. So we use all the tools you provide, I think. If you look at our architectural diagrams, it's like all these pops-up, cloud functions, composer, app engine. So we use the full suite and we love it. >> Yeah, Yeah. Okay. And then you talked this morning about the eliminating, the trade-offs with serverless of having to either when you dial it down You have to restart, but you've solved that problem, or I guess Mongo's helped you solve that problem. Can you explain that a little bit from a technical standpoint? >> Yeah. From a technical standpoint, if you look at, like as a developer, right? If you're building an intelligent app, it has multiple components within it. Right? There is pops-up for messaging, there is cloud functions and things of that nature. So you don't worry about, when it's encompassed in a serverless architecture, you don't worry about a lot of the complexities that go on behind it and so that makes the abstraction much more easier. And it eliminates the friction that a developer goes through. I think they've talked about removing friction and that's the primary source of productivity loss, which is the friction. We used to come from a world where developers were more worried. 80% of the time they would spend on plumbing this thing and then only 20% writing code. Right? And then now this whole paradigm should flip that. Right? That's where we see the promise of it. >> Do you still do stuff on Prem or are you pretty much all in the Cloud? >> Fully in the Cloud. >> How long did that take? What was that like? >> It actually was really fast. We had a real aggressive timeline. It took us six months. >> Really? >> Yeah. Yeah. And it was aggressive, but I was happy that we did it in a short period of time. >> And what was the business impact that you saw moving to the Google Cloud? >> Yeah, so obviously after we moved to the Cloud, we wanted to measure, especially the first year, how it affected us and what were the positives out of it. And yeah, we've seen tremendous results. 58% increase in speed to market. We were releasing four times more often than when we were on Prem. We saw 73% increase in initiatives delivered and while our velocity was scaling up, we also saw 30% decreased in hot fixes and rollbacks. So it became more stable while we scaled up the velocity and obviously very happy with those results. >> Wow. Do you golf? >> I don't actually. >> Do you golf? >> No. I watch golf. >> I used to watch. Okay. Do you know what a mulligan is? >> Yeah. >> Okay. mulligan is like a do-over right. If you had a mulligan, would you do anything differently? >> You know, we learned a lot and one of the keys for me was definitely automate everything, make sure that you automate as much as possible, even if it slows you down because in the future that will help you so much and use the platform and the tools that available to you. So, serverless. Right? Use Cloud the way it's supposed to be, as much as possible and I think that's the advice I would give. >> Are there any cautions with regard to automation, either of you that you see? I mean because sometimes automation brings unintended consequences and "Oops" happens really fast. >> Yeah. It's a little bit of a process. Right? If you take a step back, right, and typically what people tend to do is, there is a standardization process and once it's standardized, the next step is you gain efficiencies by automation. Right? In this whole thing, what is underestimated is change management. And we see a lot of room for improvement around educating on change management, getting ahead of that so that you can see what is coming. So that the organization moves across that. I don't know if you saw that in your case, but we see this predominantly in other other cases. >> Yeah. I mean, for us, we wanted to make sure that all the testing was in place and things like that. So not just automation of deploying or anything like that, but make sure that there is something there to catch if something goes wrong and roll back and things like that. So you want to make sure that you protected in many areas. >> So square this circle for me, because especially with COVID, so many unknowns and one of the benefits of document database is you're not tied into a schema. You got a flexible schema. Okay. So you're changing, you can change things much more easily. So when you talk about standardization, you're talking about standardizing, what at the infrastructure layer, or where does that standardization occur? Where should it occur. >> I mean, you could have it at the business process level. >> Okay. >> You could have it at the infrastructure level. You could also have it on the administration aspect of it. So there are three areas where you could apply automation to. >> So is there an analog to flexible schema at the business process level? Is that kind of how to think about it, whereas I'm not locked into a business process schema? I have to build flexibility into that as I change my? >> No, I mean, you can apply it any which way. I mean, I don't think the schema matters so much. Right? Like, for example, if you take the Forbes US case. Right? There is content curation, for example. Right? >> Yeah, okay. >> You could take content curation. Content curation in the previous world, like in the WordPress world, was not very flexible. Right? Like that it wouldn't scale. And now you are in a world where you have a very flexible schema, but the process of curating the content can be standardized. Right? And then the next step of that is to automate that. Right? And so you could apply it in any manner if you will. >> So have you built a custom CMS? Is that what you've done there? >> Yeah. We built our own custom CMS. It's AI powered. We want to make our journalist lives easier. So we're constantly trying to figure out what can we give them to make their day-to-day job much easier. >> So the machines can curate and find the best content. >> We do recommend things. Yes, absolutely. We curate, we tell them what would be the best headline, for example, what would >> Prior to them publishing? >> Yeah. Yeah. What would be the better keywords to include and things like that, what images. Just recommendations. >> And you can automate the insertion of those WordPress to go every time they do, even though they're writing about the same topic. >> It's a recommendation process obviously, but >> There is a human intelligence to that at the end. Right? I mean, but you can create a much more informed view by curating and recommending content rather than a myopic view. >> And you're eliminating that mundane keystroke task. Wow. Amazing story guys. Thanks so much for sharing. >> Absolutely. >> All right. Keep it right there. We're live from MongoDB World 2022 in New York city. Be right back. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and Abdul Razack is the vice president during the pandemic for you guys. since we launched our website But during the pandemic, Yeah, and at that and the title you provided, and the way that comes to bear, What is it that we don't at the right time, to the right people, and we are able to connect at the right time, to the right audiences What's the tech behind all this? that is relevant to you and and we embrace Cloud. of the first clients of Mongo. And at that time we we of the world we live in, isn't it? And that's the way we look at it. This morning in the but at the same time, And the feature that all the plumbing that you need to do the tie to the VMs. So we use the full suite and we love it. And then you talked this and so that makes the It actually was really fast. that we did it in a short period of time. especially the first year, Do you know what a mulligan is? If you had a mulligan, would and one of the keys for me either of you that you see? So that the organization sure that you protected and one of the benefits I mean, you could have it You could also have it on the the Forbes US case. And so you could apply it to make their day-to-day job much easier. and find the best content. the best headline, for example, what would to include and things like And you can automate the insertion I mean, but you can create that mundane keystroke task. Keep it right there.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Vadim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pravin Pillai | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vadim Supitskiy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pravin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rickard Söderberg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thomas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rickard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Evan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Micheline Nijmeh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Abdul Razack | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Micheline | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sept 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
March 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Evan Kaplan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hong Kong | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
11 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1949 | DATE | 0.99+ |
GANT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
G Suite | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
73% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mongo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
58% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Formex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
InluxData | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Abdul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: Enterprise Technology Predictions 2022
>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR, this is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> The pandemic has changed the way we think about and predict the future. As we enter the third year of a global pandemic, we see the significant impact that it's had on technology strategy, spending patterns, and company fortunes Much has changed. And while many of these changes were forced reactions to a new abnormal, the trends that we've seen over the past 24 months have become more entrenched, and point to the way that's coming ahead in the technology business. Hello and welcome to this week's Wikibon CUBE Insights powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we welcome our partner and colleague and business friend, Erik Porter Bradley, as we deliver what's becoming an annual tradition for Erik and me, our predictions for Enterprise Technology in 2022 and beyond Erik, welcome. Thanks for taking some time out. >> Thank you, Dave. Luckily we did pretty well last year, so we were able to do this again. So hopefully we can keep that momentum going. >> Yeah, you know, I want to mention that, you know, we get a lot of inbound predictions from companies and PR firms that help shape our thinking. But one of the main objectives that we have is we try to make predictions that can be measured. That's why we use a lot of data. Now not all will necessarily fit that parameter, but if you've seen the grading of our 2021 predictions that Erik and I did, you'll see we do a pretty good job of trying to put forth prognostications that can be declared correct or not, you know, as black and white as possible. Now let's get right into it. Our first prediction, we're going to go run into spending, something that ETR surveys for quarterly. And we've reported extensively on this. We're calling for tech spending to increase somewhere around 8% in 2022, we can see there on the slide, Erik, we predicted spending last year would increase by 4% IDC. Last check was came in at five and a half percent. Gardner was somewhat higher, but in general, you know, not too bad, but looking ahead, we're seeing an acceleration from the ETR September surveys, as you can see in the yellow versus the blue bar in this chart, many of the SMBs that were hard hit by the pandemic are picking up spending again. And the ETR data is showing acceleration above the mean for industries like energy, utilities, retail, and services, and also, notably, in the Forbes largest 225 private companies. These are companies like Mars or Koch industries. They're predicting well above average spending for 2022. So Erik, please weigh in here. >> Yeah, a lot to bring up on this one, I'm going to be quick. So 1200 respondents on this, over a third of which were at the C-suite level. So really good data that we brought in, the usual bucket of, you know, fortune 500, global 2000 make up the meat of that median, but it's 8.3% and rising with momentum as we see. What's really interesting right now is that energy and utilities. This is usually like, you know, an orphan stock dividend type of play. You don't see them at the highest point of tech spending. And the reason why right now is really because this state of tech infrastructure in our energy infrastructure needs help. And it's obvious, remember the Florida municipality break reach last year? When they took over the water systems or they had the ability to? And this is a real issue, you know, there's bad nation state actors out there, and I'm no alarmist, but the energy and utility has to spend this money to keep up. It's really important. And then you also hit on the retail consumer. Obviously what's happened, the work from home shift created a shop from home shift, and the trends that are happening right now in retail. If you don't spend and keep up, you're not going to be around much longer. So I think the really two interesting things here to call out are energy utilities, usually a laggard in IT spend and it's leading, and also retail consumer, a lot of changes happening. >> Yeah. Great stuff. I mean, I recall when we entered the pandemic, really ETR was the first to emphasize the impact that work from home was going to have, so I really put a lot of weight on this data. Okay. Our next prediction is we're going to get into security, it's one of our favorite topics. And that is that the number one priority that needs to be addressed by organizations in 2022 is security and you can see, in this slide, the degree to which security is top of mind, relative to some other pretty important areas like cloud, productivity, data, and automation, and some others. Now people may say, "Oh, this is obvious." But I'm going to add some context here, Erik, and then bring you in. First, organizations, they don't have unlimited budgets. And there are a lot of competing priorities for dollars, especially with the digital transformation mandate. And depending on the size of the company, this data will vary. For example, while security is still number one at the largest public companies, and those are of course of the biggest spenders, it's not nearly as pronounced as it is on average, or in, for example, mid-sized companies and government agencies. And this is because midsized companies or smaller companies, they don't have the resources that larger companies do. Larger companies have done a better job of securing their infrastructure. So these mid-size firms are playing catch up and the data suggests cyber is even a bigger priority there, gaps that they have to fill, you know, going forward. And that's why we think there's going to be more demand for MSSPs, managed security service providers. And we may even see some IPO action there. And then of course, Erik, you and I have talked about events like the SolarWinds Hack, there's more ransomware attacks, other vulnerabilities. Just recently, like Log4j in December. All of this has heightened concerns. Now I want to talk a little bit more about how we measure this, you know, relatively, okay, it's an obvious prediction, but let's stick our necks out a little bit. And so in addition to the rise of managed security services, we're calling for M&A and/or IPOs, we've specified some names here on this chart, and we're also pointing to the digital supply chain as an area of emphasis. Again, Log4j really shone that under a light. And this is going to help the likes of Auth0, which is now Okta, SailPoint, which is called out on this chart, and some others. We're calling some winners in end point security. Erik, you're going to talk about sort of that lifecycle, that transformation that we're seeing, that migration to new endpoint technologies that are going to benefit from this reset refresh cycle. So Erik, weigh in here, let's talk about some of the elements of this prediction and some of the names on that chart. >> Yeah, certainly. I'm going to start right with Log4j top of mind. And the reason why is because we're seeing a real paradigm shift here where things are no longer being attacked at the network layer, they're being attacked at the application layer, and in the application stack itself. And that is a huge shift left. And that's taking in DevSecOps now as a real priority in 2022. That's a real paradigm shift over the last 20 years. That's not where attacks used to come from. And this is going to have a lot of changes. You called out a bunch of names in there that are, they're either going to work. I would add to that list Wiz. I would add Orca Security. Two names in our emerging technology study, in addition to the ones you added that are involved in cloud security and container security. These names are either going to get gobbled up. So the traditional legacy names are going to have to start writing checks and, you know, legacy is not fair, but they're in the data center, right? They're, on-prem, they're not cloud native. So these are the names that money is going to be flowing to. So they're either going to get gobbled up, or we're going to see some IPO's. And on the other thing I want to talk about too, is what you mentioned. We have CrowdStrike on that list, We have SentinalOne on the list. Everyone knows them. Our data was so strong on Tanium that we actually went positive for the first time just today, just this morning, where that was released. The trifecta of these are so important because of what you mentioned, under resourcing. We can't have security just tell us when something happens, it has to automate, and it has to respond. So in this next generation of EDR and XDR, an automated response has to happen because people are under-resourced, salaries are really high, there's a skill shortage out there. Security has to become responsive. It can't just monitor anymore. >> Yeah. Great. And we should call out too. So we named some names, Snyk, Aqua, Arctic Wolf, Lacework, Netskope, Illumio. These are all sort of IPO, or possibly even M&A candidates. All right. Our next prediction goes right to the way we work. Again, something that ETR has been on for awhile. We're calling for a major rethink in remote work for 2022. We had predicted last year that by the end of 2021, there'd be a larger return to the office with the norm being around a third of workers permanently remote. And of course the variants changed that equation and, you know, gave more time for people to think about this idea of hybrid work and that's really come in to focus. So we're predicting that is going to overtake fully remote as the dominant work model with only about a third of the workers back in the office full-time. And Erik, we expect a somewhat lower percentage to be fully remote. It's now sort of dipped under 30%, at around 29%, but it's still significantly higher than the historical average of around 15 to 16%. So still a major change, but this idea of hybrid and getting hybrid right, has really come into focus. Hasn't it? >> Yeah. It's here to stay. There's no doubt about it. We started this in March of 2020, as soon as the virus hit. This is the 10th iteration of the survey. No one, no one ever thought we'd see a number where only 34% of people were going to be in office permanently. That's a permanent number. They're expecting only a third of the workers to ever come back fully in office. And against that, there's 63% that are saying their permanent workforce is going to be either fully remote or hybrid. And this, I can't really explain how big of a paradigm shift this is. Since the start of the industrial revolution, people leave their house and go to work. Now they're saying that's not going to happen. The economic impact here is so broad, on so many different areas And, you know, the reason is like, why not? Right? The productivity increase is real. We're seeing the productivity increase. Enterprises are spending on collaboration tools, productivity tools, We're seeing an increased perception in productivity of their workforce. And the CFOs can cut down an expense item. I just don't see a reason why this would end, you know, I think it's going to continue. And I also want to point out these results, as high as they are, were before the Omicron wave hit us. I can only imagine what these results would have been if we had sent the survey out just two or three weeks later. >> Yeah. That's a great point. Okay. Next prediction, we're going to look at the supply chain, specifically in how it's affecting some of the hardware spending and cloud strategies in the future. So in this chart, ETRS buyers, have you experienced problems procuring hardware as a result of supply chain issues? And, you know, despite the fact that some companies are, you know, I would call out Dell, for example, doing really well in terms of delivering, you can see that in the numbers, it's pretty clear, there's been an impact. And that's not not an across the board, you know, thing where vendors are able to deliver, especially acute in PCs, but also pronounced in networking, also in firewall servers and storage. And what's interesting is how companies are responding and reacting. So first, you know, I'm going to call the laptop and PC demand staying well above pre-COVID norms. It had peaked in 2012. Pre-pandemic it kept dropping and dropping and dropping, in terms of, you know, unit volume, where the market was contracting. And we think can continue to grow this year in double digits in 2022. But what's interesting, Erik, is when you survey customers, is despite the difficulty they're having in procuring network hardware, there's as much of a migration away from existing networks to the cloud. You could probably comment on that. Their networks are more fossilized, but when it comes to firewalls and servers and storage, there's a much higher propensity to move to the cloud. 30% of customers that ETR surveyed will replace security appliances with cloud services and 41% and 34% respectively will move to cloud compute and storage in 2022. So cloud's relentless march on traditional on-prem models continues. Erik, what do you make of this data? Please weigh in on this prediction. >> As if we needed another reason to go to the cloud. Right here, here it is yet again. So this was added to the survey by client demand. They were asking about the procurement difficulties, the supply chain issues, and how it was impacting our community. So this is the first time we ran it. And it really was interesting to see, you know, the move there. And storage particularly I found interesting because it correlated with a huge jump that we saw on one of our vendor names, which was Rubrik, had the highest net score that it's ever had. So clearly we're seeing some correlation with some of these names that are there, you know, really well positioned to take storage, to take data into the cloud. So again, you didn't need another reason to, you know, hasten this digital transformation, but here we are, we have it yet again, and I don't see it slowing down anytime soon. >> You know, that's a really good point. I mean, it's not necessarily bad news for the... I mean, obviously you wish that it had no change, would be great, but things, you know, always going to change. So we'll talk about this a little bit later when we get into the Supercloud conversation, but this is an opportunity for people who embrace the cloud. So we'll come back to that. And I want to hang on cloud a bit and share some recent projections that we've made. The next prediction is the big four cloud players are going to surpass 167 billion, an IaaS and PaaS revenue in 2022. We track this. Observers of this program know that we try to create an apples to apples comparison between AWS, Azure, GCP and Alibaba in IaaS and PaaS. So we're calling for 38% revenue growth in 2022, which is astounding for such a massive market. You know, AWS is probably not going to hit a hundred billion dollar run rate, but they're going to be close this year. And we're going to get there by 2023, you know they're going to surpass that. Azure continues to close the gap. Now they're about two thirds of the size of AWS and Google, we think is going to surpass Alibaba and take the number three spot. Erik, anything you'd like to add here? >> Yeah, first of all, just on a sector level, we saw our sector, new survey net score on cloud jumped another 10%. It was already really high at 48. Went up to 53. This train is not slowing down anytime soon. And we even added an edge compute type of player, like CloudFlare into our cloud bucket this year. And it debuted with a net score of almost 60. So this is really an area that's expanding, not just the big three, but everywhere. We even saw Oracle and IBM jump up. So even they're having success, taking some of their on-prem customers and then selling them to their cloud services. This is a massive opportunity and it's not changing anytime soon, it's going to continue. >> And I think the operative word there is opportunity. So, you know, the next prediction is something that we've been having fun with and that's this Supercloud becomes a thing. Now, the reason I say we've been having fun is we put this concept of Supercloud out and it's become a bit of a controversy. First, you know, what the heck's the Supercloud right? It's sort of a buzz-wordy term, but there really is, we believe, a thing here. We think there needs to be a rethinking or at least an evolution of the term multi-cloud. And what we mean is that in our view, you know, multicloud from a vendor perspective was really cloud compatibility. It wasn't marketed that way, but that's what it was. Either a vendor would containerize its legacy stack, shove it into the cloud, or a company, you know, they'd do the work, they'd build a cloud native service on one of the big clouds and they did do it for AWS, and then Azure, and then Google. But there really wasn't much, if any, leverage across clouds. Now from a buyer perspective, we've always said multicloud was a symptom of multi-vendor, meaning I got different workloads, running in different clouds, or I bought a company and they run on Azure, and I do a lot of work on AWS, but generally it wasn't necessarily a prescribed strategy to build value on top of hyperscale infrastructure. There certainly was somewhat of a, you know, reducing lock-in and hedging the risk. But we're talking about something more here. We're talking about building value on top of the hyperscale gift of hundreds of billions of dollars in CapEx. So in addition, we're not just talking about transforming IT, which is what the last 10 years of cloud have been like. And, you know, doing work in the cloud because it's cheaper or simpler or more agile, all of those things. So that's beginning to change. And this chart shows some of the technology vendors that are leaning toward this Supercloud vision, in our view, building on top of the hyperscalers that are highlighted in red. Now, Jerry Chan at Greylock, they wrote a piece called Castles in the Cloud. It got our thinking going, and he and the team at Greylock, they're building out a database of all the cloud services and all the sub-markets in cloud. And that got us thinking that there's a higher level of abstraction coalescing in the market, where there's tight integration of services across clouds, but the underlying complexity is hidden, and there's an identical experience across clouds, and even, in my dreams, on-prem for some platforms, so what's new or new-ish and evolving are things like location independence, you've got to include the edge on that, metadata services to optimize locality of reference and data source awareness, governance, privacy, you know, application independent and dependent, actually, recovery across clouds. So we're seeing this evolve. And in our view, the two biggest things that are new are the technology is evolving, where you're seeing services truly integrate cross-cloud. And the other big change is digital transformation, where there's this new innovation curve developing, and it's not just about making your IT better. It's about SaaS-ifying and automating your entire company workflows. So Supercloud, it's not just a vendor thing to us. It's the evolution of, you know, the, the Marc Andreessen quote, "Every company will be a SaaS company." Every company will deliver capabilities that can be consumed as cloud services. So Erik, the chart shows spending momentum on the y-axis and net score, or presence in the ETR data center, or market share on the x-axis. We've talked about snowflake as the poster child for this concept where the vision is you're in their cloud and sharing data in that safe place. Maybe you could make some comments, you know, what do you think of this Supercloud concept and this change that we're sensing in the market? >> Well, I think you did a great job describing the concept. So maybe I'll support it a little bit on the vendor level and then kind of give examples of the ones that are doing it. You stole the lead there with Snowflake, right? There is no better example than what we've seen with what Snowflake can do. Cross-portability in the cloud, the ability to be able to be, you know, completely agnostic, but then build those services on top. They're better than anything they could offer. And it's not just there. I mean, you mentioned edge compute, that's a whole nother layer where this is coming in. And CloudFlare, the momentum there is out of control. I mean, this is a company that started off just doing CDN and trying to compete with Okta Mite. And now they're giving you a full soup to nuts with security and actual edge compute layer, but it's a fantastic company. What they're doing, it's another great example of what you're seeing here. I'm going to call out HashiCorp as well. They're more of an infrastructure services, a little bit more of an open-source freemium model, but what they're doing as well is completely cloud agnostic. It's dynamic. It doesn't care if you're in a container, it doesn't matter where you are. They recently IPO'd and they're down 25%, but their data looks so good across both of our emerging technology and TISA survey. It's certainly another name that's playing on this. And another one that we mentioned as well is Rubrik. If you need storage, compute, and in the cloud layer and you need to be agnostic to it, they're another one that's really playing in this space. So I think it's a great concept you're bringing up. I think it's one that's here to stay and there's certainly a lot of vendors that fit into what you're describing. >> Excellent. Thank you. All right, let's shift to data. The next prediction, it might be a little tough to measure. Before I said we're trying to be a little black and white here, but it relates to Data Mesh, which is, the ideas behind that term were created by Zhamak Dehghani of ThoughtWorks. And we see Data Mesh is really gaining momentum in 2022, but it's largely going to be, we think, confined to a more narrow scope. Now, the impetus for change in data architecture in many companies really stems from the fact that their Hadoop infrastructure really didn't solve their data problems and they struggle to get more value out of their data investments. Data Mesh prescribes a shift to a decentralized architecture in domain ownership of data and a shift to data product thinking, beyond data for analytics, but data products and services that can be monetized. Now this a very powerful in our view, but they're difficult for organizations to get their heads around and further decentralization creates the need for a self-service platform and federated data governance that can be automated. And not a lot of standards around this. So it's going to take some time. At our power panel a couple of weeks ago on data management, Tony Baer predicted a backlash on Data Mesh. And I don't think it's going to be so much of a backlash, but rather the adoption will be more limited. Most implementations we think are going to use a starting point of AWS and they'll enable domains to access and control their own data lakes. And while that is a very small slice of the Data Mesh vision, I think it's going to be a starting point. And the last thing I'll say is, this is going to take a decade to evolve, but I think it's the right direction. And whether it's a data lake or a data warehouse or a data hub or an S3 bucket, these are really, the concept is, they'll eventually just become nodes on the data mesh that are discoverable and access is governed. And so the idea is that the stranglehold that the data pipeline and process and hyper-specialized roles that they have on data agility is going to evolve. And decentralized architectures and the democratization of data will eventually become a norm for a lot of different use cases. And Erik, I wonder if you'd add anything to this. >> Yeah. There's a lot to add there. The first thing that jumped out to me was that that mention of the word backlash you said, and you said it's not really a backlash, but what it could be is these are new words trying to solve an old problem. And I do think sometimes the industry will notice that right away and maybe that'll be a little pushback. And the problems are what you already mentioned, right? We're trying to get to an area where we can have more assets in our data site, more deliverable, and more usable and relevant to the business. And you mentioned that as self-service with governance laid on top. And that's really what we're trying to get to. Now, there's a lot of ways you can get there. Data fabric is really the technical aspect and data mesh is really more about the people, the process, and the governance, but the two of those need to meet, in order to make that happen. And as far as tools, you know, there's even cataloging names like Informatica that play in this, right? Istio plays in this, Snowflake plays in this. So there's a lot of different tools that will support it. But I think you're right in calling out AWS, right? They have AWS Lake, they have AWS Glue. They have so much that's trying to drive this. But I think the really important thing to keep here is what you said. It's going to be a decade long journey. And by the way, we're on the shoulders of giants a decade ago that have even gotten us to this point to talk about these new words because this has been an ongoing type of issue, but ultimately, no matter which vendors you use, this is going to come down to your data governance plan and the data literacy in your business. This is really about workflows and people as much as it is tools. So, you know, the new term of data mesh is wonderful, but you still have to have the people and the governance and the processes in place to get there. >> Great, thank you for that, Erik. Some great points. All right, for the next prediction, we're going to shine the spotlight on two of our favorite topics, Snowflake and Databricks, and the prediction here is that, of course, Databricks is going to IPO this year, as expected. Everybody sort of expects that. And while, but the prediction really is, well, while these two companies are facing off already in the market, they're also going to compete with each other for M&A, especially as Databricks, you know, after the IPO, you're going to have, you know, more prominence and a war chest. So first, these companies, they're both looking pretty good, the same XY graph with spending velocity and presence and market share on the horizontal axis. And both Snowflake and Databricks are well above that magic 40% red dotted line, the elevated line, to us. And for context, we've included a few other firms. So you can see kind of what a good position these two companies are really in, especially, I mean, Snowflake, wow, it just keeps moving to the right on this horizontal picture, but maintaining the next net score in the Y axis. Amazing. So, but here's the thing, Databricks is using the term Lakehouse implying that it has the best of data lakes and data warehouses. And Snowflake has the vision of the data cloud and data sharing. And Snowflake, they've nailed analytics, and now they're moving into data science in the domain of Databricks. Databricks, on the other hand, has nailed data science and is moving into the domain of Snowflake, in the data warehouse and analytics space. But to really make this seamless, there has to be a semantic layer between these two worlds and they're either going to build it or buy it or both. And there are other areas like data clean rooms and privacy and data prep and governance and machine learning tooling and AI, all that stuff. So the prediction is they'll not only compete in the market, but they'll step up and in their competition for M&A, especially after the Databricks IPO. We've listed some target names here, like Atscale, you know, Iguazio, Infosum, Habu, Immuta, and I'm sure there are many, many others. Erik, you care to comment? >> Yeah. I remember a year ago when we were talking Snowflake when they first came out and you, and I said, "I'm shocked if they don't use this war chest of money" "and start going after more" "because we know Slootman, we have so much respect for him." "We've seen his playbook." And I'm actually a little bit surprised that here we are, at 12 months later, and he hasn't spent that money yet. So I think this prediction's just spot on. To talk a little bit about the data side, Snowflake is in rarefied air. It's all by itself. It is the number one net score in our entire TISA universe. It is absolutely incredible. There's almost no negative intentions. Global 2000 organizations are increasing their spend on it. We maintain our positive outlook. It's really just, you know, stands alone. Databricks, however, also has one of the highest overall net sentiments in the entire universe, not just its area. And this is the first time we're coming up positive on this name as well. It looks like it's not slowing down. Really interesting comment you made though that we normally hear from our end-user commentary in our panels and our interviews. Databricks is really more used for the data science side. The MLAI is where it's best positioned in our survey. So it might still have some catching up to do to really have that caliber of usability that you know Snowflake is seeing right now. That's snowflake having its own marketplace. There's just a lot more to Snowflake right now than there is Databricks. But I do think you're right. These two massive vendors are sort of heading towards a collision course, and it'll be very interesting to see how they deploy their cash. I think Snowflake, with their incredible management and leadership, probably will make the first move. >> Well, I think you're right on that. And by the way, I'll just add, you know, Databricks has basically said, hey, it's going to be easier for us to come from data lakes into data warehouse. I'm not sure I buy that. I think, again, that semantic layer is a missing ingredient. So it's going to be really interesting to see how this plays out. And to your point, you know, Snowflake's got the war chest, they got the momentum, they've got the public presence now since November, 2020. And so, you know, they're probably going to start making some aggressive moves. Anyway, next prediction is something, Erik, that you and I have talked about many, many times, and that is observability. I know it's one of your favorite topics. And we see this world screaming for more consolidation it's going all in on cloud native. These legacy stacks, they're fighting to stay relevant, but the direction is pretty clear. And the same XY graph lays out the players in the field, with some of the new entrants that we've also highlighted, like Observe and Honeycomb and ChaosSearch that we've talked about. Erik, we put a big red target around Splunk because everyone wants their gold. So please give us your thoughts. >> Oh man, I feel like I've been saying negative things about Splunk for too long. I've got a bad rap on this name. The Splunk shareholders come after me all the time. Listen, it really comes down to this. They're a fantastic company that was designed to do logging and monitoring and had some great tool sets around what you could do with it. But they were designed for the data center. They were designed for prem. The world we're in now is so dynamic. Everything I hear from our end user community is that all net new workloads will be going to cloud native players. It's that simple. So Splunk has entrenched. It's going to continue doing what it's doing and it does it really, really well. But if you're doing something new, the new workloads are going to be in a dynamic environment and that's going to go to the cloud native players. And in our data, it is extremely clear that that means Datadog and Elastic. They are by far number one and two in net score, increase rates, adoption rates. It's not even close. Even New Relic actually is starting to, you know, entrench itself really well. We saw New Relic's adoption's going up, which is super important because they went to that freemium model, you know, to try to get their little bit of an entrenched customer base and that's working as well. And then you made a great list here, of all the new entrants, but it goes beyond this. There's so many more. In our emerging technology survey, we're seeing Century, Catchpoint, Securonix, Lucid Works. There are so many options in this space. And let's not forget, the biggest data that we're seeing is with Grafana. And Grafana labs as yet to turn on their enterprise. Elastic did it, why can't Grafana labs do it? They have an enterprise stack. So when you look at how crowded this space is, there has to be consolidation. I recently hosted a panel and every single guy on that panel said, "Please give me a consolidation." Because they're the end users trying to actually deploy these and it's getting a little bit confusing. >> Great. Thank you for that. Okay. Last prediction. Erik, might be a little out of your wheelhouse, but you know, you might have some thoughts on it. And that's a hybrid events become the new digital model and a new category in 2022. You got these pure play digital or virtual events. They're going to take a back seat to in-person hybrids. The virtual experience will eventually give way to metaverse experiences and that's going to take some time, but the physical hybrid is going to drive it. And metaverse is ultimately going to define the virtual experience because the virtual experience today is not great. Nobody likes virtual. And hybrid is going to become the business model. Today's pure virtual experience has to evolve, you know, theCUBE first delivered hybrid mid last decade, but nobody really wanted it. We did Mobile World Congress last summer in Barcelona in an amazing hybrid model, which we're showing in some of the pictures here. Alex, if you don't mind bringing that back up. And every physical event that we're we're doing now has a hybrid and virtual component, including the pre-records. You can see in our studios, you see that the green screen. I don't know. Erik, what do you think about, you know, the Zoom fatigue and all this. I know you host regular events with your round tables, but what are your thoughts? >> Well, first of all, I think you and your company here have just done an amazing job on this. So that's really your expertise. I spent 20 years of my career hosting intimate wall street idea dinners. So I'm better at navigating a wine list than I am navigating a conference floor. But I will say that, you know, the trend just goes along with what we saw. If 35% are going to be fully remote. If 70% are going to be hybrid, then our events are going to be as well. I used to host round table dinners on, you know, one or two nights a week. Now those have gone virtual. They're now panels. They're now one-on-one interviews. You know, we do chats. We do submitted questions. We do what we can, but there's no reason that this is going to change anytime soon. I think you're spot on here. >> Yeah. Great. All right. So there you have it, Erik and I, Listen, we always love the feedback. Love to know what you think. Thank you, Erik, for your partnership, your collaboration, and love doing these predictions with you. >> Yeah. I always enjoy them too. And I'm actually happy. Last year you made us do a baker's dozen, so thanks for keeping it to 10 this year. >> (laughs) We've got a lot to say. I know, you know, we cut out. We didn't do much on crypto. We didn't really talk about SaaS. I mean, I got some thoughts there. We didn't really do much on containers and AI. >> You want to keep going? I've got another 10 for you. >> RPA...All right, we'll have you back and then let's do that. All right. All right. Don't forget, these episodes are all available as podcasts, wherever you listen, all you can do is search Breaking Analysis podcast. Check out ETR's website at etr.plus, they've got a new website out. It's the best data in the industry, and we publish a full report every week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com. You can always reach out on email, David.Vellante@siliconangle.com I'm @DVellante on Twitter. Comment on our LinkedIn posts. This is Dave Vellante for the Cube Insights powered by ETR. Have a great week, stay safe, be well. And we'll see you next time. (mellow music)
SUMMARY :
bringing you data-driven and predict the future. So hopefully we can keep to mention that, you know, And this is a real issue, you know, And that is that the number one priority and in the application stack itself. And of course the variants And the CFOs can cut down an expense item. the board, you know, thing interesting to see, you know, and take the number three spot. not just the big three, but everywhere. It's the evolution of, you know, the, the ability to be able to be, and the democratization of data and the processes in place to get there. and is moving into the It is the number one net score And by the way, I'll just add, you know, and that's going to go to has to evolve, you know, that this is going to change anytime soon. Love to know what you think. so thanks for keeping it to 10 this year. I know, you know, we cut out. You want to keep going? This is Dave Vellante for the
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Erik | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jerry Chan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
March of 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zhamak Dehghani | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Marc Andreessen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tony Baer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alex | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
8.3% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
December | DATE | 0.99+ |
38% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
November, 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Erik Porter Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
41% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mars | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netskope | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Grafana | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
63% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Arctic Wolf | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
167 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Slootman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
35% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
34% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snyk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Greylock | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Edith Harbaugh, LaunchDarkly | AWS re:Invent 2021
(upbeat music) >> Hey everyone and welcome back to the CUBE's continuous live coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. continuous live coverage of AWS re:Invent 2021. Lisa Martin here with David Nicholson. We have two live sets going on, we've got two remote sets, over 100 guests working with AWS and it's a massive ecosystem of partners, really digging into the next decade of cloud innovation and we're pleased to welcome back one of our CUBE alumni, Edith Harbaugh, CEO, and co-founder of LaunchDarkly. We're going to be talking about a blueprint for continuous modernization, Edith, it's great to have you, thanks for coming. >> Thanks for having me. >> So I was doing some research, you guys raised 200 million in series D in August, just a few months ago, that new funding tripled your valuation to 3 billion up more than 3x from the previous funding rounds, so rocket ship. >> Edith: Yeah. >> I also noticed you guys are on the Forbes Cloud 100 2nd year on the list, you jumped dramatically from 100 in 2020 to 47 this year, talk to us about all the innovation and acceleration that's going on at LaunchDarkly. >> Yeah, well, it's, it's great to be here, you know, I'm the CEO and co-founder and we started seven years ago in 2014 and what we were doing back then was a really new field, like I actually came up with the name feature management, just to describe what we were doing and it was this idea that you could release features to different people at different times, which sounds really simple, but it really allows you to have valves to different populations that you can then turn something on, turn something off, run a beta, do personalization and then if something's going wrong out on the field quickly and easily, turn it off. >> So as an engineer, as a long standing engineer, what were the things that really frustrated you, that you thought this, this is missing, we've got to focus on this. >> Oh my gosh, so, I was an engineering manager, I actually do a podcast too called To Be Continuous just about all the bad things I saw happen, the worst thing you could do is, is build something that nobody wants, which is really frustrating, so I think a lot of continuous delivery came out of the urge to just get stuff out quicker. The flip side of that is that if you moved too fast, a release can be catastrophic. We used to call them the push and pray release because you push stuff out and then you're just crossing your fingers that nothing breaks because if something breaks it's extremely stressful. Your mind starts flooding with endorphins and hormones, your heart rate increases and you sometimes make even worse decisions, so what LaunchDarkly and feature management allow you to do is push it out to who you want and if something is going wrong, you could turn it off without a redeploy, if things are going right, you can continue to push it out. >> And when you say feature management, you're talking about, you're talking about a level of granularity that is finer than a release version. that is finer than a release version. >> Edith: Yeah. How do you do that? >> Our customers do it, so we provide a platform where our customers and we have 2,500 worldwide, everything from IBM and Atlassian, down to like three person startups, they decide how to encapsulate a feature >> David: Okay. >> So they could push it to who they want, so, so there's a lot of really neat use cases. >> So knowing that you're providing them with the valves. >> Edith: Yes. Then they can- think differently about how they're actually developing in anticipation of delivering encapsulated features, as opposed to, here's your new release. >> Edith: Exactly. >> Okay. >> Exactly, so we have some customers who've used LaunchDarkly to actually move to the cloud. So like TrueCar was running their own data centers and they wanted a way to start moving all of that data center traffic into AWS, so they could use LaunchDarkly to manage that traffic flow and do it in a controlled way instead of just one quick switch. >> I was looking at that case study of TrueCar, they migrated 500 websites to AWS without downtime and deploying 20x per day, which is up from 1x a week, that's a massive change. >> Yeah, I think really what we give our customers is confidence that if you know that you can always have control over stuff with feature management, you actually move much quicker. You can, you can move 20 times a day if you know that if something goes wrong, you can always turn it off, you have much more confidence. >> Where are your, you having customer conversations? I know you, you coined to the term feature management, I'd love to know a bit more contextually about the evolution from feature flags to feature management and where are those customer conversations happening? are they kind of down in the technical ways? are they more higher level? given the fact that we're in such a, still a, such a state of flux with COVID? >> Yeah, so we, we didn't invent feature flagging like the smart companies like Amazon, Facebook, Netflix have been doing feature flagging for decades now, it was always a secret sauce of this is how they could manage their own functionality. What LaunchDarkly did was kind of changed it to feature management about doing it where any other customer also had the same set of tools and platforms and also on top of that things like a workflow, scheduling, integrations. So that for example, a developer could develop something and then give the keys to the product manager, say product manager, you get to, you get to run the beta now. >> So putting, putting more control back in the hands of the folks that are, that really are touching and feeling and smelling the product. >> Yeah or customer support, you know, >> Yeah or customer support, you know, if something is going wrong in the field, instead of having to wait for an engineer to fix a bug customer support could just turn it off. >> So I'm curious about, you know, when we talk about it's a, this, this sort of dovetails with something that was discussed in the keynote today, out of the gate, Adam comes out and he's talking about microprocessor technology. Now in the era of cloud, generally people would say, that stuff doesn't matter, right? It's all about the feeling of being in the cloud and the flame, you know, the, the, the field of wheat blowing in the wind and it's a feeling that you get, it's really interesting what you're doing under the covers, but who is the, who is the audience? Who, who buys this? Because I can imagine some in the engineering, on the engineering side of things, feeling like maybe they're giving up some control, but really you're giving them more tools, but is it business people who are demanding this? how, how do you go to market? >> Yeah, so it's really interesting because our core audience is developers and VP of engineering, like they love the platform. Like our Net Promoter Score is extremely high, engineers say like, this gave me my weekends back because if a bug happens I don't have to come in. >> David: Okay so they get it. >> They get it. This isn't being pushed down- from executives that don't understand the technology. >> No, I mean, a typical thing is a developer's, like, I need this to do my job and then the business people say, well, if the developers are happy, we're happy, you know, it's, it's a developers world now, you know, they're hard to hire, you have to have them and if you have anything that will make their job easier and them happier, why wouldn't you buy it? >> That's a big facilitator, so you mentioned a high, high NPS, high Net Promoter Score, we, we talk with Amazon folks about their their focus on the customer and their customer obsession if you will, that everything starts backwards, we start from the customer, 2,500 customers in such a short time period, we talked about the funding, I imagine culturally there's similarities there, if one of the things that you're able to confidently give your customers is that confidence in LaunchDarkly. >> Yeah, you know, one of the happiest parts of my job is visiting customers, you know, I, my co-founder and I personally visited, I think the first 10 or 20 customers and if they had a bug, if they wanted something, and if they had a bug, if they wanted something, we built it. And I love going on customer sites, cause it's. And I love going on customer sites, cause it's. >> When they're telling you that you gave them their weekend back. >> Edith: Yeah. >> Huge. >> That's, yeah, that.- that's not an insignificant thing when you think about what people do with their weekends, you know, so? >> Yeah, you know, it, it feels really good to have customers say, like this literally has changed the way they built software for the better. >> I can't imagine this, you know, with everything that's happened in the last 22 months with the acceleration to cloud, but all these massive pivots by businesses, in every industry just to survive in the beginning, were an advantage, something like LaunchDarkly is for those organizations, so you have to move really, really quickly and keep changing direction to kind of figure out how do we stay afloat and now how do we thrive in that, that this has probably been a real lifesaver for a lot of organizations. >> Yeah, I mean, we've seen like a ten year roadmap at our customers compressed into a month, like we had a, a retail chain in the Midwest that was thinking about doing in-store pickup and then when COVID hit, they're like, okay, this changed from a, maybe to a, we need to have this to stay afloat and now, now they can help people pick up, same with, same with restaurants having a mobile app to do delivery or pickup, it used to be when we'll get to that next year, now it's something that you have to have. >> Oh yeah. >> Because if, if you're going to go get coffee and one place has a mile long line and their place has an app, which one are you going to pick? >> So, what do people do that don't have this capability? This, I mean, this might sound like a completely naive question, I know a lot about a lot of things, so I'm okay looking dumb sometimes, it's how I learn, so I'm okay looking dumb sometimes, it's how I learn, but seriously, if you don't have these valves, then aren't you doomed then aren't you doomed to releases that are going to be panic inducing. >> It's really, it's really painful, like, I mean, that's, that's the way I used to, to release, you know, I remember it, like you're released and you would have tried to have caught all the bugs, but it would go out and if something happened, you had to fix it on the fly and even if you have a really good deployment process, that's 20 minutes, maybe two hours. >> David: Sure, and, and. >> Which, which if you're a mobile app, it could be a business killer. >> Yeah, well we're here at AWS reinvent, I mean, how does, how does this dovetail with this, the AWS mission to migrate and modernize into the cloud native world? we're talking about cloud native, you know, development and operations that you're involved with, so there's obviously a synergy there, but why specifically AWS? >> Oh, I mean, I think one of the biggest tailwinds we've had as a business is if you're releasing twice a year, we've had as a business is if you're releasing twice a year, you don't really need a tool like this, or a platform like this, your business process is completely different, but you're going to die as a company cause you can't survive on two releases a year. If you're moving to the cloud, we help you get there and once you're in the cloud, if you want to move at the speed of business, but safely, we give you that platform. Like, so, I think continuous delivery got this bad wrap because people thought that meant that you push out stuff every second and break everything. >> David: Right. >> What we do is we allow you to innovate as fast as you want, but release in a controlled way. >> I got to ask you a question, you, you talked about the customers and your love of being with customers, one of the things I can't help thinking is that what you're helping facilitate is brand reputation. If, you know, if we have an expectation and we want to go on a, on an app and order coffee, and it's down, we're going to go to the next competitor, so from a brand reputation perspective, I'm just wondering if, if any of your customer conversations kind of go in addition to the VP of engineering kind of go in addition to the VP of engineering and it focused on the folks that are leading these companies going, our reputation is on the line, people are, let's face it during COVID far less patience than we've, we've seen a lot of really impatient people, but is, is that something that you also facilitate, is the brand reputation? >> Oh, not just a brand reputation that an outage can be costly of millions of dollars, like. that an outage can be costly of millions of dollars, like. >> Lisa: $5,600 a minute, I think is what Gartner estimates. >> Yeah, but depending on what business you're in, like if you're in a bank, you absolutely need to be reliable. If you're a streaming service like streaming, one of the biggest horse races in Australia, you need to have uptime. >> Everybody needs uptime, let's, let's just be clear if I can't get door dash or whatever, it's a disaster from my perspective as a consumer and yes, we have, we have far less patience than we've ever had. >> Yeah, I mean, we have a really interesting, we have both B2C, like streaming ash, streaming apps, delivery apps, as well as B2B streaming apps, delivery apps, as well as B2B and they both have problems that we solve but honestly, the, the, the business problems with a B2B are much more challenging sometimes. >> Well Edith, thank you so much for joining David and me on the program, talking about LaunchDarkly, what you're enabling organizations to achieve in every industry, it sounds like you're riding a rocket ship. >> It's been really fun, you know, I, I love seeing a customer that's been using us for three, five years. >> David: Wow. >> And how much their life has gotten better. >> And as you said, that's, that's no small statement. Thank you so much for joining us on the program, we appreciate your insights and look forward to hearing more news from LaunchDarkly coming out. >> Thanks. >> All right, for David Nicholson, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching theCUBE's coverage of AWS:reinvent 2021, theCUBE, the global leader in live tech coverage. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and it's a massive ecosystem of partners, you guys raised 200 million I also noticed you guys and it was this idea that you could that you thought this, this is missing, is push it out to who you want And when you say feature How do you do that? So they could push it to who they want, So knowing that you're in anticipation of delivering and they wanted a way and deploying 20x per day, that if you know that you you get to run the beta now. and smelling the product. Yeah or customer support, you know, and the flame, you know, the, the, and VP of engineering, from executives that don't and their customer obsession if you will, is visiting customers, you know, I, that you gave them their weekend back. you know, so? Yeah, you know, it, I can't imagine this, you know, now it's something that you have to have. but seriously, if you and even if you have a really Which, which if you're a mobile app, that you push out stuff every What we do is we allow you to innovate I got to ask you a question, you, that an outage can be costly think is what Gartner estimates. you need to have uptime. and yes, we have, we and they both have problems that we solve Well Edith, thank you so much It's been really fun, you know, I, And how much their And as you said, that's, you're watching theCUBE's
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Edith Harbaugh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
3 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2,500 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
two hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
August | DATE | 0.99+ |
2,500 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
500 websites | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Edith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two remote sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
200 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
over 100 guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
ten year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two live sets | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
20 customers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Atlassian | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
20 times a day | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
a mile | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
twice a year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
LaunchDarkly | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two releases | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
$5,600 a minute | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
1x a week | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
TrueCar | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
more than 3x | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
To Be Continuous | TITLE | 0.94+ |
LaunchDarkly | TITLE | 0.94+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
2nd year | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
20x per day | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
one quick switch | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
three person | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.9+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
few months ago | DATE | 0.83+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
Invent | EVENT | 0.82+ |
Midwest | LOCATION | 0.82+ |
last 22 months | DATE | 0.81+ |
first 10 | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
Krishna Gade, Fiddler AI | CUBE Conversation May 2021
(upbeat pop music) >> Well, hi everyone, John Walls here on "theCUBE" as we continue our CUBE conversations as part of the "AWS Startup Showcase". And we welcome in today Krishna Gade who is the founder and the CEO of Fiddler AI. and Krishna, good to see you today. Thanks for joining us here on the "theCUBE". >> Hey John, thanks so much for inviting us and I'm glad to be here, and looking forward to our conversation. >> Yeah me two, and first off, I want to say congratulations as I look at your company's, this tremendous roster, this list of awards that just keep coming your way. Most recently recognized by "Forbes" as one of the Top 50 AI Companies To Watch here in 2021. I know Gartner called you one of their Cool Companies not too long ago. World Economic Forum also giving you a shout out. So whatever it is you're doing, you're doing it very well, but it's got to feel good I would think, some validation to get all this kind of recognition. >> Absolutely, I know we've been very fortunate to get all the recognition. You know, part of it is also because of the space we are playing in, right? A lot of companies are, you know, operationalizing AI and therefore, you know, this whole point of, you know, explainability monitoring and governance of AI is like forefront and it's in the news for various different reasons. So there's a lot of, you know, good sort of talk that is going on in the press around how one should bear responsible AI. And we are very fortunate to be, you know, in the space and pioneering, you know, some of the technologies here. >> Right. And talking about machine learning monitoring, obviously, in the AI space, and you mentioned explainability. So let's just talk about that concept broadly first off and explain to our viewers what you mean by explainability in this particular context. >> Yeah, that's a good question. So if you think about an AI system, one of the main differences between it and a traditional software system is that it's a black box in the sense that you cannot open it up and read it's code like a traditional software system. The reason is, you know, the AI systems that are built using data and training models which are represented in this non-human readable format. And you cannot really understand how a model is actually making a prediction at any given point of time. So therefore what happens is when you are deploying these AI systems at scale for a variety of use cases, let's say credit underwriting or, you know, screening resumes, or clinical diagnosis which are extremely, you know, important for general human beings. There is a need to understand how the AI system is working. You know, why did it approve a positive person's loan or reject someone's loan? Or why did it reject someone's, you know, resume from, you know, a job screening pipeline? How is it working overall? Right? And so this is where explainability becomes important because you need to understand the AI system, you need a way to probe it, to interrogate it, to understand how the system is making predictions, how is it being influenced by various inputs you're supplying to the system. And so this gamut of technologies or the algorithms that have come across in the last, you know, few years have really matured to a point where, you know, products like Fiddler are developing them and productizing them for the general enterprise to you know, put it in their machine learning and AI workflows. >> So you're talking about context basically, right? I mean, trying to give everybody an idea. This is, you know, kind of where this inputs coming, this is where the problem is, this is where the bottleneck might be, whatever it is, and and doing that in real time. Very efficient operation here. Well, let's talk about the ML world right now and in terms of how it relates to artificial intelligence and this interaction you know, that we're seeing and the, I guess, the problem that you are trying to fix, if you will, in terms of machine learning monitoring. So let's just deal with that first off. When you look at somebody's architecture and somebody set up, what do you see? What are you looking for? And what kind of problems are you trying to solve for your clients? >> Yeah. So just following up what I said. The two main problems with operationalizing AI is one is the black box nature of AI, which I already talked about. The other problem is that the AI system is fundamentally a stochastic system or a probabilistic system. By that, I mean that its performance, you know, its predictions can change over time based on the data it is receiving. So it's not a deterministic system like traditional software systems where you expect the same output all the time, right? So when you have a system that is stochastic in nature where its performance can vary based on the data it is receiving, then you are in a situation where you have uncertainty, right? You know, you let's say you have an AI system that is deployed for serving a credit underwriting model or a fraud, you know, detection use case. And you see that, okay, sometimes accuracy is up, sometimes accuracy is down. You know, when do you want, when do you trust your predictions, when you're not. How do you know if the model is actually performing in the same manner that you trained it? All of these issues open up the need for continuous monitoring of these AI systems, because without which you may have AI systems making bad predictions for your users, hurting your business metrics, potentially making biased decisions that can put your company into a compliance or a brand reputation risk scenario. To avoid all of these things you can actually monitor these AI systems continuously so that you know exactly if they're performing the way you expect them to be. Do you to retrain them right now, right? Or do you need to shut them down because they are actually not predicting the way that you expect them to be? So this is actually very important. And so that's what Fiddler tries to solve for our customers by helping them operationalize AI with full visibility and explainability, right? So you can essentially install Fiddler in your workflow to continuously monitor your AI systems and analyze and explain them when you have questions about how they're working. >> I mean, you talked about governance earlier a little bit, you know, compliance, obviously a great critical issue, big concern, fraud detection. Security, just in general here, as we know, I mean, we keep almost every day it seems like we're hearing about some kinds of security intrusion. So, in terms of identifying vulnerabilities or in terms of identifying anomalies, whatever it might be, what kind of work are you doing in that space to give your client base the kind of comfort and the peace of mind that everybody's searching for these days? >> Right, I mean, if you step back a little bit, John, we are truly living in the age of algorithms, right? So everything that we interact with on a day-to-day basis, the movies we watch, or when we request an Uber driver, or when we go to a financial institution and request for a loan application or a mortgage, there are algorithms behind the scenes that are processing our requests and delivering the experiences that we have. Now, increasingly these algorithms are becoming AI based algorithms. And when you have these AI based algorithms, they're trained on this data that's available, that an institution may collect from their users, or they may buy from other third parties. And when you develop these AI systems based on this data, if this data is not equally distributed amongst all different ethnicity backgrounds, people coming from different cultures, different religions, different races, different genders, you may actually build systems that can make very different decisions for different individuals based on like this bias that could creep into them. And so this actually needs, this means that at the end of the day, you can actually create a dystopian world where, you know, some people get like really great decisions from your systems, where some people are left out, right? So therefore, you know, this aspect of governing your AI systems so that you're validating what you're building upfront. You're validating the data that you're using to train the systems. You're continuously monitoring the systems there so that they're actually producing the right outcomes for your users. And then you can actually explain if some customer asks you or some regulator or a third party asks you how your system is working. It's very very important. This is an emerging area in industry, certain sectors already have this, for example, financial services. It's in companies like banks, where it is mandated to have model governance, so that every model that they are deploying needs to be validated and needs to be monitored. And we are seeing the emergence of generally AI governance creeping into other sectors as well. And so this is like a broader topic that covers explainability, covers monitoring, covers detecting bias in your AI systems and ensuring that you're building safe and responsible AI for your customers and your organization. >> Yeah, I find the bias point really interesting, actually, because I hadn't really thought about these prejudices or subjectivities, you know, it might bring to our work with us in terms of what we look at, what we ignore, what we process, how we don't. But it's a really interesting point you just raised. So thank you for that. And then there's also the kind of issue with data drift too a little bit, right? It's like, where did it go (laughing)? >> Right. >> What are we doing here? What happened to it? So maybe if you could talk about that a little bit in terms of all this data that's coming in and corralling it, right? Making sure that it stays organized and stays in a way that you can analyze and process it, and then glean insight from. >> Yeah, data drift is one of the main reasons why AI systems deteriorate in performance. So for example, let's say I'm trying to build a recommendation system that predicts the items that you want to buy when you go to an E-commerce website. Now, if I have used data pre-COVID, then the user behavior was very different, right? That kind of items people were probably buying before you know, February, 2020 was like probably much different than the kind of items that people were buying after it. So what happens is when you train your AI systems on datasets that are older but then that data has changed ever since because of an event like COVID-19 has happened, or some other seasonality has kicked in, then your AI systems are seeing different distribution data. For example, you may see that suddenly, you know, people who were shopping, let's say, in March or April last year, people were shopping for all kinds of, you know, toilet paper and all kinds of things to stock up, you know, to be ready for lockdown, right? And maybe they were not buying similar amounts in there previously. So therefore, if you have an inventory management system based on AI or an E-commerce recommendation system based on AI, you know, they would see data drift, because the buying patterns are different. The amount of stuff that people are buying in terms of toilet paper has completely shifted. And so their model is actually, may not be predicting as accurately as it would, right? So therefore identifying this data drift and alerting your AI engineer so that they can be prepared for this is very important. Otherwise, what you would see is if you're an E-commerce company, this has actually happened, you know? Instacart, a grocery delivery company and another company www.etsy.com, they blogged about it where they have seen their models go down in accuracy from 90% to 65% when this data shift happened, you know, especially during COVID-19. And so you need the ability to continuously monitor for drift so that when you can catch these things earlier, and then, you know, save your business from losing, you know, in terms of business metrics like such as number of sales that you may be making, number of bad recommendations that your systems are making to your users. >> So we've talked a lot about these various components of monitoring of which, you know, all of which you do extremely well. And I was reading earlier, just a little bit about the company, and we talked about accountability. We've already talked about that. We talked about fraud detection, we talked about reliability. There was also a point about ethical considerations, you know, and so I was interested in that, hearing from you about that in terms of why that's a pillar of your service or what exactly that was pointed toward in terms of monitoring, and what you can do. >> Right. So, I guess I'll just go back to like a famous quote from Marc Andreessen. He mentioned, you know, a few years ago that software is eating the world, right? Now, what's happening is AI is eating software. All the software that we are consuming is becoming AI based software, because basically at the end of the day some intelligence is being baked into the software to make it, you know, predict more interesting things for you to make those decisions. Instead of rule-based decisions, make it more AI based decisions. And so therefore it is very important that when we are building the software, we need to use ethical practices. You know, we need to know how, where you're collecting the data from. It can be very dangerous if you don't do it and you can land into trouble. And we have seen these incidents many times, right? For example, in 2019, when Apple and Goldman Sachs came up with a credit card, a lot of customers complained about gender bias with respect to the credit card limits that the algorithm was setting. You know, in the same household, the husband and wife were getting 10 times in terms of a difference between the credit limit between a male and a female, right? Even though they probably had similar salary ranges, similar FICO scores, right? So if you do not actually make sure that, you know, you're collecting data from the right sources that your datasets are not outbalanced. If your models, if your algorithms are tested for bias you know, before hand, before you deploy them and then you're continuously monitoring them, these are all ethical practices. These are all the responsible ways of building your AI. You can actually, you know, land into trouble. Your customers will complain about it. You know, you would lose your brand reputation. And at the end of the day you'll be essentially, and instead of actually adding value to the customers, you may be actually hurting them, right? And so this is actually why it's so important, and it's become more important when the more stakes, the higher the stakes are, right? You know, for example, when it's being used for criminal justice scenarios or when it's being used for clinical diagnosis scenarios. Being able to ensure that the system is making unbiased decisions is very, very important. >> Well, before I let you go, too, I like you to touch base on your AWS relationship about, you know, what was the Genesis of that. And currently what it is that you're working on together to provide this great value to your customers. >> Absolutely. So the follow-up to this ethical AI is like Amazon as a company is interested in pursuing, you know, the responsible AI but, you know, they have a lot of AI products. So they are looking for, you know, fostering a community and ecosystem of AI technologies. And in that hypothesis they actually invested in Fiddler last year in terms of enabling us to develop this explainable AI and ethical AI technology. And so we are working with Alexa Fund and also like AWS ecosystem in terms of partnering with how effectively Fiddler can be delivered to other AWS customers through, like, through their marketplace and other sort of areas that we can distribute the software. So it's a great partnership. We are very, very excited about the opportunity to work with Alexa Fund as well as the AWS ecosystem. It increases another opportunity for us to enable a lot more customers than we than we can otherwise. So this is a great win-win situation for both Amazon and Fiddler. >> Well, it sure is. And congratulations on that and developing that partnership. I know it's working well for your clients and it's working well for Fiddler AI obviously by the number of recognitions that have been coming your way. So Krishna, we wish you continued success and thanks for the time here today on "theCUBE". >> Yep. Thank you so much, John. It was a pleasure talking to you today. >> I enjoyed it. Thank you. John Walls here wrapping up our conversation with Fiddler AI's Krishna Gade, talking today about machine learning monitoring on the "AWS Startup Showcase". (upbeat pop music)
SUMMARY :
and Krishna, good to see you today. and I'm glad to be here, I know Gartner called you one in the space and pioneering, you know, and you mentioned explainability. across in the last, you know, few years the problem that you are the way you expect them to be. you know, compliance, obviously So therefore, you know, prejudices or subjectivities, you know, that you can analyze and process it, for drift so that when you can of which, you know, to make it, you know, predict too, I like you to touch base the responsible AI but, you know, So Krishna, we wish you continued success It was a pleasure talking to you today. on the "AWS Startup Showcase".
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Marc Andreessen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Walls | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Krishna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
February, 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
John Walls | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Krishna Gade | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Goldman Sachs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
May 2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fiddler AI | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
COVID-19 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Fiddler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
65% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
April last year | DATE | 0.97+ |
Instacart | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
FICO | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
two main problems | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
World Economic Forum | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Alexa Fund | TITLE | 0.91+ |
AWS Startup Showcase | EVENT | 0.9+ |
Alexa | TITLE | 0.88+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.82+ |
www.etsy.com | OTHER | 0.82+ |
Top 50 AI Companies | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Fund | OTHER | 0.77+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.76+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
Startup Showcase | EVENT | 0.72+ |
theCUBE | TITLE | 0.64+ |
Forbes | TITLE | 0.59+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
CUBE Conversation | EVENT | 0.56+ |
IBM2 Jerry Cuomo VTT
(melodious music) >> Voiceover: From around the globe. It's theCUBE with digital coverage of IBM Think 2021. Brought to you by IBM. >> Hi and welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of IBM Think 2021 virtual. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. We're a virtual this year. But we'll be in real life soon, right around the corner, as we come out of COVID. We got a great guest, a CUBE alumni, Jerry Cuomo, IBM Fellow VP, CTO for IBM automation. Jerry, great to see you. Been on since almost since the early days of theCUBE. Good to see you >> Yeah, John. Thrilled to be back again. Thank you. >> What I love about our conversations, one is you're super technical. You've got patents under your belt. You're on the cutting edge. You've been involved in web services and web technologies for a long, long time. You're constantly riding the wave. And also you're a creator of a great podcast called "The Art of Automation", which is the subject of this discussion. As automation becomes central in cloud operations and Hybrid Cloud, which is the main theme of this event this year and the industry. So great to see you. First give us a little background for the folks that may not know you, about your history with IBM and who you are. >> Yeah. So thanks John. So I'm Jerry Cuomo. I've been with IBM for about three decades and I started my career at IBM research in Yorktown at the dawn of the internet. And I've been incredibly fortunate as you mentioned, to be on the forefront of many technology trends over the last three decades, internet software, middleware, including being one of the founding fathers of WebSphere software. I recently helped launch the IBM blockchain initiative and now all about AI powered automation. Which actually brings me back to my roots of studying AI in graduate school. So it's kind of come full circle for me, really enjoying the topic. >> It's funny you mentioned AI in graduate school. I was really kind of into AI when I was an undergraduate and get a master's degree in Computer Science. I kind of went the MBA route. But if you think about what was going on in the eighties during those systems times, a lot of the concepts of systems programming and cloud operations kind of gel well together. So you got this confluence of computer science and engineering AKA now DevOps, DevSecOps, coming together. This is actually a really unique time to bring back the best of the best concepts. Whether it's AI and systems and computer science and engineering into automation. Could you share your view on this? Because you're in a unique position, you've been there done that, now you're on the cutting edge. What's your thoughts? >> Yeah, absolutely John. And just when you think of automation and time, automation is not new. That literally, if you go into Wikipedia and you look up automation, you see patents and references to like steam engine regulators at the dawn of the industrial era, right? So automation has been around and in its simplest form, automation whether it was back then, whether it was in the eighties or today it's about applying technology that uses technology software to perform tasks that were once exclusively done by us, humans. But now what we're seeing is AI coming into the picture and changing the landscape in an interesting way. But I think at its essence, automation is this two-step dance of both eliminating repetitive mundane tasks that help reduce errors and free up our time. So we get back the gift of time, but also helps. It's not about taking jobs away at that point, it's a sentence of two-step dance. That's step one. But if you stop there, you're not getting the full value. Step two is to augment our skills. And to use automation, to help augment our skills. And we get speed, we get quality, we get lower costs, we get improved user experience. So whether it was back in the steam engine times or today with AI, automation is evolving with technology. >> And it's interesting too, as a student of the history of the computer industry, as you are and now a creator with your podcast, which we'll get to in a second. You're starting to see the intersection of these concerts and not bespoke as much as they used to be. You got transformation, digital transformation and innovation are connected and scale. If you think about those three concepts, they don't stand alone anymore. They can stand alone, but they work better together. Transformation. And it is the innovation, innovation provides cloud scale. So if you think about automation, automation is powering this dynamic of taking all that undifferentiated heavy lifting and moving the creativity and the skillset into higher integrated areas. Can you share your thoughts? >> Yeah, no, right on there. When you talk about transformation, jeez, look around us. The pandemic has made, transformation and specifically digital transformation, the default. So everything is digital. Whether it's ordering a pizza, visiting a doctor through telemedicine, or this zoom WebEx based workplace that we live in. But picture a telemedicine environment, talking about transformation and going digital. With 10 X more users, they can't hire 10 X more support staff. And think about it. I forgot my password, does this work on my version of the Apple iPhone or all of that kind of stuff? So their support desks are lit up, right? So as they scale digitally, automation is the relief that that comes into play, which is just in time. So the digital transformation needs automation. And John, I think about it like this, businesses like cars have become computers. So they're programmable. So automation software just like in the cars, it makes the car self-driving. I think about the Tesla model three, which I recently test drove. So with this digital acceleration, digital opens the door for automation. And now we can muse about self-driving business. We can muse about maybe that's step one, right? That's the remove repetitive work, but maybe we can actually augment business to have an autopilot. So it doesn't need us there all the time to drive. And that's the scale that you talked about. That's the scale we need. So automation is really like the peanut butter and chocolate. Digital is the peanut butter automation is the chocolate. They go well together and they produce amazing tastes. >> Yeah. That's a really interesting insight. And I was just put an exclamation point on that because you mentioned self-driving business you're implying, you said the business is a computer. So if you just think about that mind blowing concept for a second. If it's a computer, what's the operating system and what's the suite of applications that are on top of it? So, okay. Let's go in the old days you had a windows machine and you had office, which was a system software, applications software construct. If you map that to the entire company, you're talking about Red Hat and IBM will kind of come working together. Kind of connects the dots a little bit on what Red Hat could, because they're not breaking system company. So if Hybrid Cloud is the system, edge, hybrid, then you got the application suite is all software for the business. >> That's right. That's right. And if you listen to anything these days about what IBM stands for, it's Hybrid Cloud and think Red Hat as kind of the core element of that with OpenShift and AI. And both of those really matter in terms of automation and maybe I'll come back to the Hybrid Cloud or Red Hat thing in a second, but let's just talk about Watson and AI, which is the application. You mentioned scale, which I'm so glad you did. AI could help scale automation. And the trick is, is that automation sometimes gets stuck. It gets stuck when it's working with data that is noisy or unstructured. So there's a lot of structured data in your organization. With that, we can breeze through automation. But if there is more ambiguous data, unstructured, noisy, you need a human in the loop. And when you get a human in the loop, it slows things down. So what AI can start to do, AI and its subordinates, machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision. We can start to make sense of both unstructured and structured data together and we can make a big deal going forward. So that's the AI part. You mentioned Red Hat and, and Hybrid Cloud Park. Well, think about it this way, when you shop, how many stores do you... You don't just shop in one store, right? You go to specialty stores to pick up that special catsup, I don't know or mustard. (audio cuts) In one store and maybe do shopping in another store. Customers using clouds John, aren't very different. They have their specialty places to go. Maybe they're going to be running workloads in Google, involving search and AI related to search. And they're going to be using other clouds for more specialty things. From that perspective, that's a view of hybrid. Customers today, take that shopping analogy. They're going to be using Salesforce or Servicenow, IBM cloud, they have a private cloud. So when you think about automating that world, it's the real world. It's how we shop, whether it's for groceries or for cloud. The Hybrid Cloud is a reality. And how do you make sense of that? Because when an average customer has five clouds, how do you deal with five things? How do you make it easy, normalize? And that's what Red hat really does. >> It's interesting. I'll just share with you though. When I interviewed Arvin, who is now the CEO of IBM when he was at Red Hat summit 2019 in San Francisco. Before he made the acquisition, I was peppering him with questions. Like, you need to get this cloud and he loves cloud, you know, he loves cloud. So he was smiling. He just wanted to say it, he wanted to just say it. And I think Red hat brings that operating kind of mindset where the clouds are just subsystems in the OS of the middleware, which is now software which is software defined business. And this kind of is the talk of your views. Now you have a podcast called "Art of Automation". We want to get that in there, for the folks watching. Search for the podcast, "Art of Automation". This is the stories that you tell. Tell us some stories, from this phenomena. What's the impact of automation for the holistic picture? >> Well, it starts with a lot of, I guess it starts with customers. The stories start with the customer. So we're hearing from customers that AI and automation is where they're investing in 2021. For all the reasons we briefly mentioned, and IBM has a lot to offer there. So we've made AI powered automation a priority. But John, in the pursuit of making it a priority, I've started talking with many of our subject matter experts and was floored by their knowledge, their energy, their passion, and their stories. And I said, we can't keep this to ourselves. We can't keep this locked away. We have to share it. We have to let it out. So basically this is what started the podcast around that. And since then, we've had many industry luminaries from IBM and outside. Starting with customers. We had Klaus Jensen who is the CIO of Memorial Clones Kettering Hospital to talk about automation in healthcare. And he shared great stories. You need to listen to them, about automation is not going to take the place of doctors. But automation will help better read x-rays and look at those shades of gray on the x-ray and interpret it much better than we can. And be able to ingest all of the up-to-date medical research to provide pointers and make connections that the human may not be able to do in that moment. So the two working together are better than any individual. Carol Polson recently joined me to talk, and she's the CIO for Cooperators, to talk about automation and insurance. And she had some great stories too. So John, with that, a bunch of IBM, great IBM fellows like Rama Akkiraju, who is one of Forbes top 20 women in AI research. Talking about AI ops. And also Ruchir Puri talking, and Ruchir has been working on Watson since jeopardy to tell stories about ultimately now how we're teaching AI to code and all the modern programming languages. And really automating application modernization and the like. Four keyed episodes in, we have those under our belt. About 6,000 downloads so far. So it's coming along pretty well. Thanks for asking, John. >> The key is you're a content creator now, as well as a fellow. And this is the democratization, as we say direct to audience, share those stories. Also here, I think you released an ebook. Tell us a little quickly about that. We've got one minute left, give a quick plug for the ebook. >> The book echoes the podcast. Chapters relate to the episodes of the book. We're dropping the first five chapters plus forward for free on the IBM website. Other chapters will become available and drop as they become available. The book makes the content searchable on the internet. We go into more detail with advice on how to get started. You get to hear the topics and the voice of those subject matter experts. And I really suggest you go out and check it out. >> All right, Jerry Cuomo. IBM fellow VP, CTO, IBM automation. Also a content creator, podcast "Art of Automation." Jerry, we're going to list it out on our Silicon angle and our cube sites, gets you some extra love on that. Love the podcast, love the focus on sharing from experts in the field. Thanks for coming on. >> Yeah. Thank you so much for having me again, John. >> Okay, I'm John Furrier with theCUBE. Here for IBM Think 2021. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by IBM. Good to see you Thank you. for the folks that may not know you, in Yorktown at the dawn of the internet. a lot of the concepts and changing the landscape and moving the creativity all the time to drive. Kind of connects the dots a little bit of the core element of that This is the stories that you tell. and she's the CIO for Cooperators, give a quick plug for the ebook. and the voice of those from experts in the field. for having me again, John. Thanks for watching.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jerry Cuomo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carol Polson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Klaus Jensen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Arvin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ruchir | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rama Akkiraju | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jerry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Yorktown | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
five things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 X | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
The Art of Automation | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Memorial Clones Kettering Hospital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ruchir Puri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Art of Automation | TITLE | 0.99+ |
five clouds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two-step | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Hybrid Cloud Park | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
eighties | DATE | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one store | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
About 6,000 downloads | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Hybrid Cloud | TITLE | 0.98+ |
first five chapters | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Red hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
three concepts | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
Four keyed episodes | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
Red Hat summit 2019 | EVENT | 0.94+ |
OpenShift | TITLE | 0.94+ |
step one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
two-step dance | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.9+ |
Step two | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
about three decades | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Servicenow | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
Jerry Cuomo, IBM | IBM Think 2021
>>from around the globe. It's the >>cube >>With digital coverage of IBM think 2021 brought to you by IBM. Hello and welcome back to the cubes coverage of IBM Think 2021 virtual. I'm john for a year host of the cube. We're virtual this year in real life. Soon, right around the corner as we come out of code, we've got a great guest cube alumni jerry, cuomo IBM fellow V P C T O for IBM automation jerry, Great to see you uh nonsense got almost since the early days of the cube. Good to see you, >>john thrilled to be back again. Thank you >>what I love about our conversations. One is your super technical, you've got patents under your belt during the cutting edge. You've been involved in web services and web technologies for a long, long time. You constantly riding the wave and also your creator of a great podcast called the art of automation, which is the subject of this discussion as automation becomes central in cloud operations and hybrid cloud, which is the main theme of this event this year and the industry so great to see you. Uh First team is a little background for the folks that may not know you about your history with IBM and who you are. >>Yeah, so thanks john, So I'm I'm jerry Carrillo, I've been with IBM for about three decades and I started my career at IBM research in Yorktown at the dawn of the internet and I've been incredibly fortunate, as you mentioned to be on the forefront of many technology trends over the last three decades. Internet software middleware, including being one of the founding fathers of web sphere software, uh I recently helped launch the IBM Blockchain initiative and now all about aI powered automation, which actually brings me back to my roots of studying AI and graduate school. So it's kind of come full circle for me, you know, really you know, enjoying the topic. >>You know, these funny, you mentioned aI in graduate school, I was really kind of into a I when I was an undergraduate and get a masters degree in computer science, I kind of went the NBA route. But if you think about what was going on in the eighties during those systems times, a lot of the concepts of systems programming and cloud operations kind of gel well together. So you've got this confluence of computer science and engineering A. K A. Now devops sec cops coming together. This is actually a really unique time to bring back the best of the best concepts, whether it's A I and systems and computer science and engineering into the automation. Could you share your view on this because you're in a unique position, you've been there, done that now. You're on the cutting edge with your thoughts. >>Yeah, absolutely, john And just when you think of automation and time, automation is not new, literally, if you go into Wikipedia and you look up automation, you see patents and references to like steam engine regulators at the dawn of the industrial era. Right? So automation has been around and and in the simplest form automation, whether it was back then, um whether it was in the 80s or today, it's about applying technology and that that performs, that uses like technology software to perform tasks that were once exclusively done by us humans. Right? So, but now what we're seeing is a I coming into the picture and and changing the landscape in an interesting way. But I think at its essence, you know, automation is this two step dance of both eliminating repetitive, mundane tasks. That helped reduce errors and free up our time. So we get back the gift of time but also helps. It's not about taking jobs away at that point, as I said, it's a two step dance, that's step one. But if you stop there, you're not getting the full value. Step two is to augment our skills right? And and to use automation to help augment our skills and we get speed, we get quality, we get lower costs, we get improved user experience. So whether it was back in the steam engine times or today with a I automation is evolving with technology >>and it's interesting to its you know, as a student of the history of the computer industry as you are and now a creator with your podcast which we'll get to in a second, you're starting to see the intersection of these concepts are not bespoke as much as they used to be. You got transformation. Digital, transformation and innovation are connected and scale. If you think about those three concepts they don't stand alone anymore. They can stand alone but they work better together transformation. And is the innovation innovation provides cloud scale. So if you think about automation, automation is powering this dynamic of taking all that undifferentiated heavy lifting and moving the creativity and the skill set into higher integrated areas. Can you share >>your john Yeah no right on there when you talk about transformation, jeez look around us, the pandemic has made transformation and specifically digital transformation the default so everything is digital. You know whether it's ordering a pizza, you know visiting a doctor through telemedicine or or this zoom webex based workplace that we live in. But picture of telemedicine environment right? Talking about transformation and going digital With 10 x more users. They can't hire 10 x more support staff and think about it I forgot my password. Um Does does this work on my version of the Apple iphone or all of that kind of stuff? So their support desks or lit up? Right. So uh as they scale digitally automation is the relief that that comes into play which is which is just in time. Right? So the digital transformation needs automation and john I think about it like this um businesses like cars are have become computers right? So they are programmable. So automation software just like in the cars it makes you know the car self driving? I think about the Tesla model three which I recently test drove. Um so with this digital acceleration digital opens the door for automation And now we can use about a self driving business. We can use about uh maybe that's step one, right? That's the um remove repetitive work, but maybe we can actually augment business to have an autopilot so it doesn't eat us there all the time to drive. And that's the scale that you talked about. That's the scale we need. So automation is really like the peanut butter and chocolate Digital is the peanut butter, automation is the chocolate. They go well together and they produce amazing tastes. >>You know, that's a really, that's a really interesting insight and I will just put an exclamation point on that because you mentioned self driving business, you're implying, you said the computer, the business is a computer. So if you just just think about that mind blowing concept for a second, if it's a computer, what's the operating system and what's the suite of applications that are on top of it? So, Okay, let's go in the old days at a Windows machine and you had office, which is a system software, applications, software construct. Okay, If you map that to the entire company, you're talking about Red hat and IBM kind of come working together. Kind of connects the dots a little bit on what Red Hackett because they're not bring system company. So if hybrid cloud is the system mm hybrid, then you got the applications suite is all software for the That's >>right. That's right. And if you, you know, if you listen to anything these days about what IBM stands words, hybrid cloud and and think red hat as as, you know, kind of the core element of that with open shift in a I right. And both of those really matter in terms of automation and maybe I'll come back to the hybrid cloud and red hat thing in a second. Let's just talk about you know Watson and Ai, you know, which is the application and you mentioned scale, which I'm so glad you did. You know a I could help scale automation. And the trick is is that ai automation sometimes gets stuck right? It gets stuck when it's working with data that is noisy or unstructured. Right? So there's a lot of structured data in your organization and it it with that we can breeze through automation. But if there is more ambiguous data unstructured noisy, you need a human in the loop. And when you get a human in the loop, it slows things down. So what a I can start to do a I. And its subordinates, machine learning, natural language processing, computer vision. We can start to make sense of both unstructured and structured data together and we can make a big deal going forward. Right? So that's that's the way I part you mentioned Red hat and and hybrid cloud part. We'll think about it this way. When you shop, how many stores do you don't just shop in one store? Right. You you go to specialty stores to pick up that special uh ketchup, I don't know or must store and maybe do shopping another store, customers using clouds john aren't very different. You know, they have their specialty places to go. Maybe they're going to be running workloads and google involving search and a I related to search, right? And they're going to be using other clouds for more specialty things. Right? So from that perspective, that's a view of hybrid, you know, customers today, you know, take that shopping analogy, they're going to be using sales force or service Now, IBM cloud, they have a private cloud, right? So, when you think about automating that world, All right. It's the real world. It's how we shop, whether it's for groceries or for cloud, right? So the hybrid cloud is a reality. Um and how do you make sense of a high of that? Right, Because when when an average customer has five clouds, How do you deal with five things? Right. How do you make it easy normalize? And that's what red hat really >>does. It's interesting. I just just share with you the and I interviewed Arvin um who is now the ceo of IBM when he was at Red Hat some in 2019 in SAn Francisco before he made the acquisition here that I was, I was peppered with questions like you know, you need to get this cloud and he loves cloud, you know, he loves clouds. So so he was smiling, he just wanted to say it, I wanted to just say it and I think Red Hat brings that operating kind of mindset where the clouds are just subsystems in the Os >>yes of the middle >>where which is now software which is software to find business. And this kind of is the talk of your, your your views. Now you have a podcast called Art of automation. Want to get that in there for the folks watching uh search for the podcast, Art of automation. This is the stories that you tell. Tell us some stories from this phenomenon. What's the impact of automation for the holistic picture? >>Well, it starts with a lot of, I guess it starts with customers. The stories start with the customers. So we're hearing from customers that Ai and automation is where they're investing in 2021. Um for all the reasons we briefly mentioned and and IBM has a lot to offer there. So we've made a I powered automation of priority but john in the pursuit of making it a priority. I've started talking with many of our subject matter experts and was floored by their knowledge, their energy, their passion and their stories. And I said we can't keep this to ourselves, we can't keep this locked away, we have to share it, we have to let it out. So, so basically this is what started the podcast around that. And since then we've had many industry luminaries from IBM and outside, starting with customers, we had claus Jensen who is the ceo of memorial clones Kettering hospital to talk about automation and health care. And he shared great stories. You need to listen to them about. Automation is not going to take the place of doctors, but automation will help better read um x rays and look at those shades of gray on the X ray and interpret it much better than we can and be able to ingest all of the up to date medical research to provide pointers and make connections that the human may not be able to do in that moment. Right. So the two working together or better than any individual carol Poulsen recently joined me to talk and she's the C. I. O. For cooperators to talk about automation and insurance. And she had some great stories to uh so john with that a bunch of IBM great IBM fellows like Rama Agra jew, who is one of Forbes top 20 women in AI research, talking about Ai ops and also Russia near pori talking and Russia has been working on Watson since jeopardy to tell stories about ultimately now how we're teaching ai to code and all the modern programming languages and really automating application modernization and the like uh, 14 episodes in we have those under our belt, About 6000 downloads so far. So it's it's coming along pretty well. Thanks. >>Thanks for being done. Yeah. The key is your your content creator now as well as a fellow and this is the democratization, as we say, direct to audience, share those stories also here. And thank you released an e book. Tell us a little quickly about that. We've got one minute left, give a quick plug. >>The book echoes the podcast chapters relate to the, to the episodes of the book. We're dropping the first five chapters plus forward for free on the IBM website. Other chapters will become available um, and drop as they become available. The book makes the content searchable on the internet. We go into more detail with advice on how to get started. You get to hear the topics and the voice of those subject matter experts and uh I really, you know, suggest you go out and check it out. >>Alright, jerry, cuomo IBM fellow VPC T IBM automation um also a content creator podcast, art of automation, jerry. We're gonna lift it listed on our silicon angle and our cube sites. Get you some extra love on that. Love the podcast. Love the focus on sharing from experts in the field. Thanks for coming on. >>Thank you so much for having me again, john >>Okay. I'm John Fryer with the Cube here for IBM think 2021. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
It's the With digital coverage of IBM think 2021 brought to you by IBM. Thank you You constantly riding the wave and also your creator of dawn of the internet and I've been incredibly fortunate, as you mentioned to be on the forefront of many You're on the cutting edge with your thoughts. So automation has been around and and in the simplest and it's interesting to its you know, as a student of the history of the computer industry as you are and now And that's the scale that you talked about. So, Okay, let's go in the old days at a Windows machine and you had office, which is a system software, So that's that's the way I part you mentioned Red hat and and hybrid cloud before he made the acquisition here that I was, I was peppered with questions like you know, you need to get this cloud and This is the stories that you tell. and make connections that the human may not be able to do in that moment. And thank you released an e book. The book echoes the podcast chapters relate to the, Love the focus on sharing from experts in the field. Thanks for watching.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jerry Cuomo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
jerry Carrillo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
14 episodes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Yorktown | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Fryer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
red hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iphone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
john | PERSON | 0.99+ |
SAn Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
carol Poulsen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
jerry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
80s | DATE | 0.98+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ | |
five clouds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Windows | TITLE | 0.98+ |
claus Jensen | PERSON | 0.98+ |
10 x | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first five chapters | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two step dance | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three concepts | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one store | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
eighties | DATE | 0.96+ |
step one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
First team | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
About 6000 downloads | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.95+ |
Russia | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Tesla | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Art of automation | TITLE | 0.93+ |
model three | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.92+ |
10 x | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Red hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
step one | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Red Hackett | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Think | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.9+ |
Rama Agra | PERSON | 0.89+ |
year | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Russia | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Watson | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
20 women | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
cuomo | PERSON | 0.85+ |
last three decades | DATE | 0.83+ |
Ai | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Think 2021 virtual | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.78+ |
Step two | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
Wikipedia | ORGANIZATION | 0.74+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.74+ |
Arvin um | PERSON | 0.73+ |
Opening Keynote | AWS Startup Showcase: Innovations with CloudData and CloudOps
(upbeat music) >> Welcome to this special cloud virtual event, theCUBE on cloud. This is our continuing editorial series of the most important stories in cloud. We're going to explore the cutting edge most relevant technologies and companies that will impact business and society. We have special guests from Jeff Barr, Michael Liebow, Jerry Chen, Ben Haynes, Michael skulk, Mike Feinstein from AWS all today are presenting the top startups in the AWS ecosystem. This is the AWS showcase of startups. I'm showing with Dave Vellante. Dave great to see you. >> Hey John. Great to be here. Thanks for having me. >> So awesome day today. We're going to feature a 10 grade companies amplitude, auto grid, big ID, cordial Dremio Kong, multicloud, Reltio stardog wire wheel, companies that we've talked to. We've researched. And they're going to present today from 10 for the rest of the day. What's your thoughts? >> Well, John, a lot of these companies were just sort of last decade, they really, were keyer kicker mode, experimentation mode. Now they're well on their way to hitting escape velocity which is very exciting. And they're hitting tens of millions dollars of ARR, many are planning IPO's and it's just it's really great to see what the cloud has enabled and we're going to dig into that very deeply today. So I'm super excited. >> Before we jump into the keynote (mumbles) our non Huff from AWS up on stage Jeremy is the brains behind this program that we're doing. We're going to do this quarterly. Jeremy great to see you, you're in the global startups program at AWS. Your job is to keep the crops growing, keep the startups going and keep the flow of innovation. Thanks for joining us. >> Yeah. Made it to startup showcase day. I'm super excited. And as you mentioned my team the global startup program team, we kind of provide white glove service for VC backed startups and help them with go to market activities. Co-selling with AWS and we've been looking for ways to highlight all the great work they're doing and partnering with you guys has been tremendous. You guys really know how to bring their stories to life. So super excited about all the partner sessions today. >> Well, I really appreciate the vision and working with Amazon this is like truly a bar raiser from theCUBE virtual perspective, using the virtual we can get more content, more flow and great to have you on and bring that the top hot startups around data, data ops. Certainly the most important story in tech is cloud scale with data. You you can't look around and seeing more innovation happening. So I really appreciate the work. Thanks for coming on. >> Yeah, and don't forget, we're making this a quarterly series. So the next one we've already been working on it. The next one is Wednesday, June 16th. So mark your calendars, but super excited to continue doing these showcases with you guys in the future. >> Thanks for coming on Jeremy. I really appreciate it,. Dave so I want to just quick quickly before we get Jeff up here, Jeff Barr who's a luminary guests for us this week who has been in the industry has been there from the beginning of AWS the role of data, and what's happened in cloud. And we've been watching the evolution of Amazon web services from the beginning, from the startup market to dominate in the enterprise. If you look at the top 10 enterprise companies Amazon wasn't on that list in 2010 they weren't even bringing the top 10 Andy Jassy's keynote at reinvent this past year. Highlighted that fact, I think they were number five or four as vendor in just AWS. So interesting to see that you've been reporting and doing a lot of analysis on the role of data. What's your analysis for these startups and as businesses need to embrace the new technologies and be on the right side of history not part of that old guard, incumbent failed model. >> Well, I think again, if you look back on the early days of cloud, it was really about storage and networking and compute infrastructure. And then we collected all this data and now you're seeing the next generation of innovation and value. We're going to talk to Michael Liebow about this is really if you look at all the value points in the leavers, it's all around data and data is going through a massive change in the way that we think about it, that we talk about it. And you hear that a lot. Obviously you talk about the volumes, the giant volumes but there's something else going on as AWS brings the cloud to the edge. And of course it looks at the data centers, just another edge device, data is getting highly decentralized. And what we're seeing is data getting into the hands of business owners and data product builders. I think we're going to see a new parlance emerge and that's where you're seeing the competitive advantage. And if you look at all the real winners these days in the marketplace especially in the digital with COVID, it all comes back to the data. And we're going to talk about that a lot today. >> One of the things that's coming up in all of our cube interviews, certainly we've seen, I mean we've had a great observation space across all the ecosystems, but the clear thing that's coming out of COVID is speed, agility, scale, and data. If you don't have that data you are going to be a non-player. And I think I heard some industry people talking about the future of how the stock market's going to work and that if you're not truly in market with an AI or machine learning data value play you probably will be shorted on the stock market or delisted. I think people are looking at that as a table stakes competitive advantage item, where if you don't have some sort of data competitive strategy you're going to be either delisted or sold short. And that's, I don't think delisted but the point is this table-stakes Dave. >> Well, I think too, I think the whole language the lingua franca of data is changing. We talk about data as an asset all the time, but you think about it now, what do we do with assets? We protect it, we hide it. And we kind of we don't share it. But then on the other hand, everybody talks about sharing the data and that is a huge trend in the marketplace. And so I think that everybody is really starting to rethink the whole concept of data, what it is, its value and how we think about it, talk about it, share it make it accessible, and at the same time, protect it and make it governed. And I think you're seeing, computational governance and automation really hidden. Couldn't do this without the cloud. I mean, that's the bottom line. >> Well, I'm super excited to have Jeff Barr here from AWS as our special keynote guests. I've been following Jeff's career for a long, long time. He's a luminaries, he's a technical, he's in the industry. He's part of the community, he's been there from the beginning AWS just celebrate its 15th birthday as he was blogging hard. He's been a hardcore blogger. I think Jeff, you had one of the original ping service. If I remember correctly, you were part of the web services foundational kind of present at creation. No better guests to have you Jeff thanks for coming up on our stage. >> John and Dave really happy to be here. >> So I got to ask you, you've been blogging hard for the past decade or so, going hard and your job has evolved from blogging about what's new with Amazon. A couple of building blocks a few services to last reinvent them. You must have put out I don't know how many blog posts did you put out last year at every event? I mean, it must have been a zillion. >> Not quite a zillion. I think I personally wrote somewhere between 20 and 25 including quite a few that I did in the month or so run up to reinvent and it's always intense, but it's always really, really fun. >> So I've got to ask you in the past couple of years, I mean I quoted Andy Jassy's keynote where we highlight in 2010 Amazon wasn't even on the top 10 enterprise players. Now in the top five, you've seen the evolution. What is the big takeaway from your standpoint as you look at the enterprise going from Amazon really dominating the start of a year startups today, you're in the cloud, you're born in the cloud. There's advantage to that. Now enterprises are kind of being reborn in the cloud at the same time, they're building these new use cases rejuvenating themselves and having innovation strategy. What's your takeaway? >> So I love to work with our customers and one of the things that I hear over and over again and especially the last year or two is really the value that they're placing on building a workforce that has really strong cloud skills. They're investing in education. They're focusing on this neat phrase that I learned in Australia called upskilling and saying let's take our set of employees and improve their skill base. I hear companies really saying we're going to go cloud first. We're going to be cloud native. We're going to really embrace it, adopt the full set of cloud services and APIs. And I also see that they're really looking at cloud as part of often a bigger picture. They often use the phrase digital transformation, in Amazon terms we'd say they're thinking big. They're really looking beyond where they are and who they are to what they could be and what they could grow into. Really putting a lot of energy and creativity into thinking forward in that way. >> I wonder Jeff, if you could talk about sort of how people are thinking about the future of cloud if you look at where the spending action is obviously you see it in cloud computing. We've seen that as the move to digital, serverless Lambda is huge. If you look at the data it's off the charts, machine learning and AI also up there containers and of course, automation, AWS leads in all of those. And they portend a different sort of programming model a different way of thinking about how to deploy workloads and applications maybe different than the early days of cloud. What's driving that generally and I'm interested in serverless specifically. And how do you see the next several years folding out? >> Well, they always say that the future is the hardest thing to predict but when I talked to our enterprise customers the two really big things that I see is there's this focus that says we need to really, we're not simply like hosting the website or running the MRP. I'm working with one customer in particular where they say, well, we're going to start on the factory floor all the way up to the boardroom effectively from IOT and sensors on the factory floor to feed all the data into machine learning. So they understand that the factory is running really well to actually doing planning and inventory maintenance to putting it on the website to drive the analytics, to then saying, okay, well how do we know that we're building the right product mix? How do we know that we're getting it out through the right channels? How are our customers doing? So they're really saying there's so many different services available to us in the cloud and they're relatively easy and straightforward to deploy. They really don't think in the old days as we talked about earlier that the old days where these multi-year planning and deployment cycles, now it's much more straightforward. It's like let's see what we can do today. And this week and this month, and from idea to some initial results is a much, much shorter turnaround. So they can iterate a lot more quickly which is just always known to produce better results. >> Well, Jeff and the spirit of the 15th birthday of AWS a lot of services have been built from the original three. I believe it was the core building blocks and there's been a lot of history and it's kind of like there was a key decoupling of compute from storage, those innovations what's the most important architectural change if any has happened or built upon those building blocks with AWS that you could share with companies out there as many people are coming into the cloud not just lifting and shifting and having that innovation but really building cloud native and now hybrid full cloud operations, day two operations. However you want to look at it. That's a big thing. What architecturally has changed that's been innovative from those original building blocks? >> Well, I think that the basic architecture has proven to be very, very resilient. When I wrote about the 15 year birthday of Amazon S3 a couple of weeks ago one thing that I thought was really incredible was the fact that the same APIs that you could have used 15 years ago they all still work. The put, the get, the list, the delete, the permissions management, every last one of those were chosen with extreme care. And so they all still work. So one of the things you think about when you put APIs out there is in Amazon terms we always talk about going through a one-way door and a one way door says, once you do it you're committed for the indefinite future. And so you we're very happy to do that but we take those steps with extreme care. And so those basic building blocks so the original S3 APIs, the original EC2 APIs and the model, all those things really worked. But now they're running at this just insane scale. One thing that blows me away I routinely hear my colleagues talking about petabytes and exabytes, and we throw around trillions and quadrillions like they're pennies. It's kind of amazing. Sometimes when you hear the scale of requests per day or request per month, and the orders of magnitude are you can't map them back to reality anymore. They're simply like literally astronomical. >> If I can just jump in real quick Dave before you ask Jeff, I was watching the Jeff Bezos interview in 1999 that's been going around on LinkedIn in a 60 minutes interview. The interviewer says you are reporting that you can store a gigabyte of customer data from all their purchases. What are you going to do with that? He basically nailed the answer. This is in 99. We're going to use that data to create, that was only a gig. >> Well one of the things that is interesting to me guys, is if you look at again, the early days of cloud, of course I always talked about that in small companies like ours John could have now access to information technology that only big companies could get access to. And now you've seen we just going to talk about it today. All these startups rise up and reach viability. But at the same time, Jeff you've seen big companies get the aha moment on cloud and competition drives urgency and that drives innovation. And so now you see everybody is doing cloud, it's a mandate. And so the expectation is a lot more innovation, experimentation and speed from all ends. It's really exciting to see. >> I know this sounds hackneyed and overused but it really, really still feels just like day one. We're 15 plus years into this. I still wake up every morning, like, wow what is the coolest thing that I'm going to get to learn about and write about today? We have the most amazing customers, one of the things that is great when you're so well connected to your customers, they keep telling you about their dreams, their aspirations, their use cases. And we can just take that and say we can actually build awesome things to help you address those use cases from the ground on up, from building custom hardware things like the nitro system, the graviton to the machine learning inferencing and training chips where we have such insight into customer use cases because we have these awesome customers that we can make these incredible pieces of hardware and software to really address those use cases. >> I'm glad you brought that up. This is another big change, right? You're getting the early days of cloud like, oh, Amazon they're just using off the shelf components. They're not buying these big refrigerator sized disc drives. And now you're developing all this custom Silicon and vertical integration in certain aspects of your business. And that's because workload is demanding. You've got to get more specialized in a lot of cases. >> Indeed they do. And if you watch Peter DeSantis' keynote at re-invent he talked about the fact that we're researching ways to make better cement that actually produces less carbon dioxide. So we're now literally at the from the ground on up level of construction. >> Jeff, I want to get a question from the crowd here. We got, (mumbles) who's a good friend of theCUBE cloud Arate from the beginning. He asked you, he wants to know if you'd like to share Amazon's edge aspirations. He says, he goes, I mean, roadmaps. I go, first of all, he's not going to talk about the roadmaps, but what can you share? I mean, obviously the edge is key. Outpost has been all in the news. You obviously at CloudOps is not a boundary. It's a distributed network. What's your response to-- >> Well, the funny thing is we don't generally have technology roadmaps inside the company. The roadmap is always listen really well to customers not just where they are, but the customers are just so great at saying, this is where we'd like to go. And when we hear edge, the customers don't generally come to us and say edge, they say we need as low latency as possible between where the action happens within our factory floors and our own offices and where we might be able to compute, analyze, store make decisions. And so that's resulted in things like outposts where we can put outposts in their own data center or their own field office, wavelength, where we're working with 5G telecom providers to put computing storage in the carrier hubs of the various 5G providers. Again, with reducing latency, we've been doing things like local zones, where we put zones in an increasing number of cities across the country with the goal of just reducing the average latency between the vast majority of customers and AWS resources. So instead of thinking edge, we really think in terms of how do we make sure that our customers can realize their dreams. >> Staying on the flywheel that AWS has built on ship stuff faster, make things faster, smaller, cheaper, great mission. I want to ask you about the working backwards document. I know it's been getting a lot of public awareness. I've been, that's all I've learned in interviewing Amazon folks. They always work backwards. I always mentioned the customer and all the interviews. So you've got a couple of customer references in there check the box there for you. But working backwards has become kind of a guiding principles, almost like a Harvard Business School case study approach to management. As you guys look at this working backwards and ex Amazonians have written books about it now so people can go look at, it's a really good methodology. Take us back to how you guys work back from the customers because here we're featuring 10 startups. So companies that are out there and Andy has been preaching this to customers. You should think about working backwards because it's so fast. These companies are going into this enterprise market your ecosystem of startups to provide value. What things are you seeing that customers need to think about to work backwards from their customer? How do you see that? 'Cause you've been on the community side, you see the tech side customers have to move fast and work backwards. What are the things that they need to focus on? What's your observation? >> So there's actually a brand new book called "Working Backwards," which I actually learned a lot about our own company from simply reading the book. And I think to me, a principal part of learning backward it's really about humility and being able to be a great listener. So you don't walk into a customer meeting ready to just broadcast the latest and greatest that we've been working on. You walk in and say, I'm here from AWS and I simply want to learn more about who you are, what you're doing. And most importantly, what do you want to do that we're not able to help you with right now? And then once we hear those kinds of things we don't simply write down kind of a bullet item of AWS needs to improve. It's this very active listening process. Tell me a little bit more about this challenge and if we solve it in this way or this way which one's a better fit for your needs. And then a typical AWS launch, we might talk to between 50 and 100 customers in depth to make sure that we have that detailed understanding of what they would like to do. We can't always meet all the needs of these customers but the idea is let's see what is the common base that we can address first. And then once we get that first iteration out there, let's keep listening, let's keep making it better and better and better as quickly. >> A lot of people might poopoo that John but I got to tell you, John, you will remember this the first time we ever met Andy Jassy face-to-face. I was in the room, you were on the speaker phone. We were building an app on AWS at the time. And he was asking you John, for feedback. And he was probing and he pulled out his notebook. He was writing down and he wasn't just superficial questions. He was like, well, why'd you do it that way? And he really wanted to dig. So this is cultural. >> Yeah. I mean, that's the classic Amazon. And that's the best thing about it is that you can go from zero startups zero stage startup to traction. And that was the premise of the cloud. Jeff, I want to get your thoughts and commentary on this love to get your opinion. You've seen this grow from the beginning. And I remember 'cause I've been playing with AWS since the beginning as well. And it says as an entrepreneur I remember my first EC2 instance that didn't even have custom domain support. It was the long URL. You seen the startups and now that we've been 15 years in, you see Dropbox was it just a startup back in the day. I remember these startups that when they were coming they were all born on Amazon, right? These big now unicorns, you were there when these guys were just developers and these gals. So what's it like, I mean, you see just the growth like here's a couple of people with them ideas rubbing nickels together, making magic happen who knows what's going to turn into, you've been there. What's it been like? >> It's been a really unique journey. And to me like the privilege of a lifetime, honestly I've like, you always want to be part of something amazing and you aspire to it and you study hard and you work hard and you always think, okay, somewhere in this universe something really cool is about to happen. And if you're really, really lucky and just a million great pieces of luck like lineup in series, sometimes it actually all works out and you get to be part of something like this when it does you don't always fully appreciate just how awesome it is from the inside, because you're just there just like feeding the machine and you are just doing your job just as fast as you possibly can. And in my case, it was listening to teams and writing blog posts about their launches and sharing them on social media, going out and speaking, you do it, you do it as quickly as possible. You're kind of running your whole life as you're doing that as well. And suddenly you just take a little step back and say, wow we did this kind of amazing thing, but we don't tend to like relax and say, okay, we've done it at Amazon. We get to a certain point. We recognize it. And five minutes later, we're like, okay, let's do the next amazingly good thing. But it's been this just unique privilege and something that I never thought I'd be fortunate enough to be a part of. >> Well, then the last few minutes we have Jeff I really appreciate you taking the time to spend with us for this inaugural launch of theCUBE on cloud startup showcase. We are showcasing 10 startups here from your ecosystem. And a lot of people who know AWS for the folks that don't you guys pride yourself on community and ecosystem the global startups program that Jeremy and his team are running. You guys nurture these startups. You want them to be successful. They're vectoring out into the marketplace with growth strategy, helping customers. What's your take on this ecosystem? As customers are out there listening to this what's your advice to them? How should they engage? Why is these sets of start-ups so important? >> Well, I totally love startups and I've spent time in several startups. I've spent other time consulting with them. And I think we're in this incredible time now wheres, it's so easy and straightforward to get those basic resources, to get your compute, to get your storage, to get your databases, to get your machine learning and to take that and to really focus on your customers and to build what you want. And we see this actual exponential growth. And we see these startups that find something to do. They listen to one of their customers, they build that solution. And they're just that feedback cycle gets started. It's really incredible. And I love to see the energy of these startups. I love to hear from them. And at any point if we've got an AWS powered startup and they build something awesome and want to share it with me, I'm all ears. I love to hear about them. Emails, Twitter mentions, whatever I'll just love to hear about all this energy all those great success with our startups. >> Jeff Barr, thank you for coming on. And congratulations, please pass on to Andy Jassy who's going to take over for Jeff Bezos and I saw the big news that he's picking a successor an Amazonian coming back into the fold, Adam. So congratulations on that. >> I will definitely pass on your congratulations to Andy and I worked with Adam in the past when AWS was just getting started and really looking forward to seeing him again, welcoming back and working with him. >> All right, Jeff Barr with AWS guys check out his Twitter and all the social coordinates. He is pumping out all the resources you need to know about if you're a developer or you're an enterprise looking to go to the next level, next generation, modern infrastructure. Thanks Jeff for coming on. Really appreciate it. Our next guests want to bring up stage Michael Liebow from McKinsey cube alumni, who is a great guest who is very timely in his McKinsey role with a paper he and his colleagues put out called cloud's trillion dollar prize up for grabs. Michael, thank you for coming up on stage with Dave and I. >> Hey, great to be here, John. Thank you. >> One of the things I loved about this and why I wanted you to come on was not only is the report awesome. And Dave has got a zillion questions, he want us to drill into. But in 2015, we wrote a story called Andy Jassy trillion dollar baby on Forbes, and then on medium and silken angle where we were the first ones to profile Andy Jassy and talk about this trillion dollar term. And Dave came up with the calculation and people thought we were crazy. What are you talking about trillion dollar opportunity. That was in 2015. You guys have put this together with a serious research report with methodology and you left a lot on the table. I noticed in the report you didn't even have a whole section quantified. So I think just scratching the surface trillion. I'd be a little light, Dave, so let's dig into it, Michael thanks for coming on. >> Well, and I got to say, Michael that John's a trillion dollar baby was revenue. Yours is EBITDA. So we're talking about seven to X, seven to eight X. What we were talking back then, but great job on the report. Fantastic work. >> Thank you. >> So tell us about the report gives a quick lowdown. I got some questions. You guys are unlocking the value drivers but give us a quick overview of this report that people can get for free. So everyone who's registered will get a copy but give us a quick rundown. >> Great. Well the question I think that has bothered all of us for a long time is what's the business value of cloud and how do you quantify it? How do you specify it? Because a lot of people talk around the infrastructure or technical value of cloud but that actually is a big problem because it just scratches the surface of the potential of what cloud can mean. And we focus around the fortune 500. So we had to box us in somewhat. And so focusing on the fortune 500 and fast forwarding to 2030, we put out this number that there's over a trillion dollars worth of value. And we did a lot of analysis using research from a variety of partners, using third-party research, primary research in order to come up with this view. So the business value is two X the technical value of cloud. And as you just pointed out, there is a whole unlock of additional value where organizations can pioneer on some of the newest technologies. And so AWS and others are creating platforms in order to do not just machine learning and analytics and IOT, but also for quantum or mixed reality for blockchain. And so organizations specific around the fortune 500 that aren't leveraging these capabilities today are going to get left behind. And that's the message we were trying to deliver that if you're not doing this and doing this with purpose and with great execution, that others, whether it's others in your industry or upstarts who were motioning into your industry, because as you say cloud democratizes compute, it provides these capabilities and small companies with talent. And that's what the skills can leverage these capabilities ahead of slow moving incumbents. And I think that was the critical component. So that gives you the framework. We can deep dive based on your questions. >> Well before we get into the deep dive, I want to ask you we have startups being showcased here as part of the, it will showcase, they're coming out of the ecosystem. They have a lot of certification from Amazon and they're secure, which is a big issue. Enterprises that you guys talk to McKinsey speaks directly to I call the boardroom CXOs, the top executives. Are they realizing that the scale and timing of this agility window? I mean, you want to go through these key areas that you would break out but as startups become more relevant the boardrooms that are making these big decisions realize that their businesses are up for grabs. Do they realize that all this wealth is shifting? And do they see the role of startups helping them? How did you guys come out of them and report on that piece? >> Well in terms of the whole notion, we came up with this framework which looked at the opportunity. We talked about it in terms of three dimensions, rejuvenate, innovate and pioneer. And so from the standpoint of a board they're more than focused on not just efficiency and cost reduction basically tied to nation, but innovation tied to analytics tied to machine learning, tied to IOT, tied to two key attributes of cloud speed and scale. And one of the things that we did in the paper was leverage case examples from across industry, across-region there's 17 different case examples. My three favorite is one is Moderna. So software for life couldn't have delivered the vaccine as fast as they did without cloud. My second example was Goldman Sachs got into consumer banking is the platform behind the Apple card couldn't have done it without leveraging cloud. And the third example, particularly in early days of the pandemic was Zoom that added five to 6,000 servers a night in order to scale to meet the demand. And so all three of those examples, plus the other 14 just indicate in business terms what the potential is and to convince boards and the C-suite that if you're not doing this, and we have some recommendations in terms of what CEOs should do in order to leverage this but to really take advantage of those capabilities. >> Michael, I think it's important to point out the approach at sometimes it gets a little wonky on the methodology but having done a lot of these types of studies and observed there's a lot of superficial studies out there, a lot of times people will do, they'll go I'll talk to a customer. What kind of ROI did you get? And boom, that's the value study. You took a different approach. You have benchmark data, you talked to a lot of companies. You obviously have a lot of financial data. You use some third-party data, you built models, you bounded it. And ultimately when you do these things you have to ascribe a value contribution to the cloud component because fortunate 500 companies are going to grow even if there were no cloud. And the way you did that is again, you talk to people you model things, and it's a very detailed study. And I think it's worth pointing out that this was not just hey what'd you get from going to cloud before and after. This was a very detailed deep dive with really a lot of good background work going into it. >> Yeah, we're very fortunate to have the McKinsey Global Institute which has done extensive studies in these areas. So there was a base of knowledge that we could leverage. In fact, we looked at over 700 use cases across 19 industries in order to unpack the value that cloud contributed to those use cases. And so getting down to that level of specificity really, I think helps build it from the bottom up and then using cloud measures or KPIs that indicate the value like how much faster you can deploy, how much faster you can develop. So these are things that help to kind of inform the overall model. >> Yeah. Again, having done hundreds, if not thousands of these types of things, when you start talking to people the patterns emerge, I want to ask you there's an exhibit tool in here, which is right on those use cases, retail, healthcare, high-tech oil and gas banking, and a lot of examples. And I went through them all and virtually every single one of them from a value contribution standpoint the unlocking value came down to data large data sets, document analysis, converting sentiment analysis, analytics. I mean, it really does come down to the data. And I wonder if you could comment on that and why is it that cloud is enabled that? >> Well, it goes back to scale. And I think the word that I would use would be data gravity because we're talking about massive amounts of data. So as you go through those kind of three dimensions in terms of rejuvenation one of the things you can do as you optimize and clarify and build better resiliency the thing that comes into play I think is to have clean data and data that's available in multiple places that you can create an underlying platform in order to leverage the services, the capabilities around, building out that structure. >> And then if I may, so you had this again I want to stress as EBITDA. It's not a revenue and it's the EBITDA potential as a result of leveraging cloud. And you listed a number of industries. And I wonder if you could comment on the patterns that you saw. I mean, it doesn't seem to be as simple as Negroponte bits versus Adam's in terms of your ability to unlock value. What are the patterns that you saw there and why are the ones that have so much potential why are they at the top of the list? >> Well, I mean, they're ranked based on impact. So the five greatest industries and again, aligned by the fortune 500. So it's interesting when you start to unpack it that way high-tech oil, gas, retail, healthcare, insurance and banking, right? Top. And so we did look at the different solutions that were in that, tried to decipher what was fully unlocked by cloud, what was accelerated by cloud and what was perhaps in this timeframe remaining on premise. And so we kind of step by step, expert by expert, use case by use case deciphered of the 700, how that applied. >> So how should practitioners within organizations business but how should they use this data? What would you recommend, in terms of how they think about it, how they apply it to their business, how they communicate? >> Well, I think clearly what came out was a set of best practices for what organizations that were leveraging cloud and getting the kind of business return, three things stood out, execution, experience and excellence. And so for under execution it's not just the transaction, you're not just buying cloud you're changing their operating model. And so if the organization isn't kind of retooling the model, the processes, the workflows in order to support creating the roles then they aren't going to be able, they aren't going to be successful. In terms of experience, that's all about hands-on. And so you have to dive in, you have to start you have to apply yourself, you have to gain that applied knowledge. And so if you're not gaining that experience, you're not going to move forward. And then in terms of excellence, and it was mentioned earlier by Jeff re-skilling, up-skilling, if you're not committed to your workforce and pushing certification, pushing training in order to really evolve your workforce or your ways of working you're not going to leverage cloud. So those three best practices really came up on top in terms of what a mature cloud adopter looks like. >> That's awesome. Michael, thank you for coming on. Really appreciate it. Last question I have for you as we wrap up this trillion dollar segment upon intended is the cloud mindset. You mentioned partnering and scaling up. The role of the enterprise and business is to partner with the technologists, not just the technologies but the companies talk about this cloud native mindset because it's not just lift and shift and run apps. And I have an IT optimization issue. It's about innovating next gen solutions and you're seeing it in public sector. You're seeing it in the commercial sector, all areas where the relationship with partners and companies and startups in particular, this is the startup showcase. These are startups are more relevant than ever as the tide is shifting to a new generation of companies. >> Yeah, so a lot of think about an engine. A lot of things have to work in order to produce the kind of results that we're talking about. Brad, you're more than fair share or unfair share of trillion dollars. And so CEOs need to lead this in bold fashion. Number one, they need to craft the moonshot or the Marshot. They have to set that goal, that aspiration. And it has to be a stretch goal for the organization because cloud is the only way to enable that achievement of that aspiration that's number one, number two, they really need a hardheaded economic case. It has to be defined in terms of what the expectation is going to be. So it's not loose. It's very, very well and defined. And in some respects time box what can we do here? I would say the cloud data, your organization has to move in an agile fashion training DevOps, and the fourth thing, and this is where the startups come in is the cloud platform. There has to be an underlying platform that supports those aspirations. It's an art, it's not just an architecture. It's a living, breathing live service with integrations, with standardization, with self service that enables this whole program. >> Awesome, Michael, thank you for coming on and sharing the McKinsey perspective. The report, the clouds trillion dollar prize is up for grabs. Everyone who's registered for this event will get a copy. We will appreciate it's also on the website. We'll make sure everyone gets a copy. Thanks for coming, I appreciate it. Thank you. >> Thanks, Michael. >> Okay, Dave, big discussion there. Trillion dollar baby. That's the cloud. That's Jassy. Now he's going to be the CEO of AWS. They have a new CEO they announced. So that's going to be good for Amazon's kind of got clarity on the succession to Jassy, trusted soldier. The ecosystem is big for Amazon. Unlike Microsoft, they have the different view, right? They have some apps, but they're cultivating as many startups and enterprises as possible in the cloud. And no better reason to change gears here and get a venture capitalist in here. And a friend of theCUBE, Jerry Chen let's bring them up on stage. Jerry Chen, great to see you partner at Greylock making all the big investments. Good to see you >> John hey, Dave it's great to be here with you guys. Happy marks.Can you see that? >> Hey Jerry, good to see you man >> So Jerry, our first inaugural AWS startup showcase we'll be doing these quarterly and we're going to be featuring the best of the best, you're investing in all the hot startups. We've been tracking your careers from the beginning. You're a good friend of theCUBE. Always got great commentary. Why are startups more important than ever before? Because in the old days we've talked about theCUBE before startups had to go through certain certifications and you've got tire kicking, you got to go through IT. It's like going through security at the airport, take your shoes off, put your belt on thing. I mean, all kinds of things now different. The world has changed. What's your take? >> I think startups have always been a great way for experimentation, right? It's either new technologies, new business models, new markets they can move faster, the experiment, and a lot of startups don't work, unfortunately, but a lot of them turned to be multi-billion dollar companies. I thing startup is more important because as we come out COVID and economy is recovery is a great way for individuals, engineers, for companies for different markets to try different things out. And I think startups are running multiple experiments at the same time across the globe trying to figure how to do things better, faster, cheaper. >> And McKinsey points out this use case of rejuvenate, which is essentially retool pivot essentially get your costs down or and the next innovation here where there's Tam there's trillion dollars on unlock value and where the bulk of it is is the innovation, the new use cases and existing new use cases. This is where the enterprises really have an opportunity. Could you share your thoughts as you invest in the startups to attack these new waves these new areas where it may not look the same as before, what's your assessment of this kind of innovation, these new use cases? >> I think we talked last time about kind of changing the COVID the past year and there's been acceleration of things like how we work, education, medicine all these things are going online. So I think that's very clear. The first wave of innovation is like, hey things we didn't think we could be possible, like working remotely, e-commerce everywhere, telemedicine, tele-education, that's happening. I think the second order of fact now is okay as enterprises realize that this is the new reality everything is digital, everything is in the cloud and everything's going to be more kind of electronic relation with the customers. I think that we're rethinking what does it mean to be a business? What does it mean to be a bank? What does it mean to be a car company or an energy company? What does it mean to be a retailer? Right? So I think the rethinking that brands are now global, brands are all online. And they now have relationships with the customers directly. So I think if you are a business now, you have to re experiment or rethink about your business model. If you thought you were a Nike selling shoes to the retailers, like half of Nike's revenue is now digital right all online. So instead of selling sneakers through stores they're now a direct to consumer brand. And so I think every business is going to rethink about what the AR. Airbnb is like are they in the travel business or the experience business, right? Airlines, what business are they in? >> Yeah, theCUBE we're direct to consumer virtual totally opened up our business model. Dave, the cloud premise is interesting now. I mean, let's reset this where we are, right? Andy Jassy always talks about the old guard, new guard. Okay we've been there done that, even though they still have a lot of Oracle inside AWS which we were joking the other day, but this new modern era coming out of COVID Jerry brings this up. These startups are going to be relevant take territory down in the enterprises as new things develop. What's your premise of the cloud and AWS prospect? >> Well, so Jerry, I want to to ask you. >> Jerry: Yeah. >> The other night, last Thursday, I think we were in Clubhouse. Ben Horowitz was on and Martine Casado was laying out this sort of premise about cloud startups saying basically at some point they're going to have to repatriate because of the Amazon VIG. I mean, I'm paraphrasing and I guess the premise was that there's this variable cost that grows as you scale but I kind of shook my head and I went back. You saw, I put it out on Twitter a clip that we had the a couple of years ago and I don't think, I certainly didn't see it that way. Maybe I'm getting it wrong but what's your take on that? I just don't see a snowflake ever saying, okay we're going to go build our own data center or we're going to repatriate 'cause they're going to end up like service now and have this high cost infrastructure. What do you think? >> Yeah, look, I think Martin is an old friend from VMware and he's brilliant. He has placed a lot of insights. There is some insights around, at some point a scale, use of startup can probably run things more cost-effectively in your own data center, right? But I think that's fewer companies more the vast majority, right? At some point, but number two, to your point, Dave going on premise versus your own data center are two different things. So on premise in a customer's environment versus your own data center are two different worlds. So at some point some scale, a lot of the large SaaS companies run their own data centers that makes sense, Facebook and Google they're at scale, they run their own data centers, going on premise or customer's environment like a fortune 100 bank or something like that. That's a different story. There are reasons to do that around compliance or data gravity, Dave, but Amazon's costs, I don't think is a legitimate reason. Like if price is an issue that could be solved much faster than architectural decisions or tech stacks, right? Once you're on the cloud I think the thesis, the conversation we had like a year ago was the way you build apps are very different in the cloud and the way built apps on premise, right? You have assume storage, networking and compute elasticity that's independent each other. You don't really get that in a customer's data center or their own environment even with all the new technologies. So you can't really go from cloud back to on-premise because the way you build your apps look very, very different. So I would say for sure at some scale run your own data center that's why the hyperscale guys do that. On-premise for customers, data gravity, compliance governance, great reasons to go on premise but for vast majority of startups and vast majority of customers, the network effects you get for being in the cloud, the network effects you get from having everything in this alas cloud service I think outweighs any of the costs. >> I couldn't agree more and that's where the data is, at the way I look at it is your technology spend is going to be some percentage of revenue and it's going to be generally flat over time and you're going to have to manage it whether it's in the cloud or it's on prem John. >> Yeah, we had a quote on theCUBE on the conscious that had Jerry I want to get your reaction to this. The executive said, if you don't have an AI strategy built into your value proposition you will be shorted as a stock on wall street. And I even went further. So you'll probably be delisted cause you won't be performing with a tongue in cheek comment. But the reality is that that's indicating that everyone has to have AI in their thing. Mainly as a reality, what's your take on that? I know you've got a lot of investments in this area as AI becomes beyond fashion and becomes table stakes. Where are we on that spectrum? And how does that impact business and society as that becomes a key part of the stack and application stack? >> Yeah, I think John you've seen AI machine learning turn out to be some kind of novelty thing that a bunch of CS professors working on years ago to a funnel piece of every application. So I would say the statement of the sentiment's directionally correct that 20 years ago if you didn't have a web strategy or a website as a company, your company be sure it, right? If you didn't have kind of a internet website, you weren't real company. Likewise, if you don't use AI now to power your applications or machine learning in some form or fashion for sure you'd be at a competitive disadvantage to everyone else. And just like if you're not using software intelligently or the cloud intelligently your stock as a company is going to underperform the rest of the market. And the cloud guys on the startups that we're backing are making AI so accessible and so easy for developers today that it's really easy to use some level of machine learning, any applications, if you're not doing that it's like not having a website in 1999. >> Yeah. So let's get into that whole operation side. So what would you be your advice to the enterprises that are watching and people who are making decisions on architecture and how they roll out their business model or value proposition? How should they look at AI and operations? I mean big theme is day two operations. You've got IT service management, all these things are being disrupted. What's the operational impact to this? What's your view on that? >> So I think two things, one thing that you and Dave both talked about operation is the key, I mean, operations is not just the guts of the business but the actual people running the business, right? And so we forget that one of the values are going to cloud, one of the values of giving these services is you not only have a different technology stack, all the bits, you have a different human stack meaning the people running your cloud, running your data center are now effectively outsource to Amazon, Google or Azure, right? Which I think a big part of the Amazon VIG as Dave said, is so eloquently on Twitter per se, right? You're really paying for those folks like carry pagers. Now take that to the next level. Operations is human beings, people intelligently trying to figure out how my business can run better, right? And that's either accelerate revenue or decrease costs, improve my margin. So if you want to use machine learning, I would say there's two areas to think about. One is how I think about customers, right? So we both talked about the amount of data being generated around enterprise individuals. So intelligently use machine learning how to serve my customers better, then number two AI and machine learning internally how to run my business better, right? Can I take cost out? Can I optimize supply chain? Can I use my warehouses more efficiently my logistics more efficiently? So one is how do I use AI learning to be a more familiar more customer oriented and number two, how can I take cost out be more efficient as a company, by writing AI internally from finance ops, et cetera. >> So, Jerry, I wonder if I could ask you a little different subject but a question on tactical valuations how coupled or decoupled are private company valuations from the public markets. You're seeing the public markets everybody's freaking out 'cause interest rates are going to go up. So the future value of cash flows are lower. Does that trickle in quickly into the private markets? Or is it a whole different dynamic? >> If I could weigh in poly for some private markets Dave I would have a different job than I do today. I think the reality is in the long run it doesn't matter as much as long as you're investing early. Now that's an easy answer say, boats have to fall away. Yes, interest rates will probably go up because they're hard to go lower, right? They're effectively almost zero to negative right now in most of the developed world, but at the end of the day, I'm not going to trade my Twilio shares or Salesforce shares for like a 1% yield bond, right? I'm going to hold the high growth tech stocks because regardless of what interest rates you're giving me 1%, 2%, 3%, I'm still going to beat that with a top tech performers, Snowflake, Twilio Hashi Corp, bunch of the private companies out there I think are elastic. They're going to have a great 10, 15 year run. And in the Greylock portfolio like the things we're investing in, I'm super bullish on from Roxanne to Kronos fear, to true era in the AI space. I think in the long run, next 10 years these things will outperform the market that said, right valuation prices have gone up and down and they will in our careers, they have. In the careers we've been covering tech. So I do believe that they're high now they'll come down for sure. Will they go back up again? Definitely, right? But as long as you're betting these macro waves I think we're all be good. >> Great answer as usual. Would you trade them for NFTs Jerry? >> That $69 million people piece of artwork look, I mean, I'm a longterm believer in kind of IP and property rights in the blockchain, right? And I'm waiting for theCUBE to mint this video as the NFT, when we do this guys, we'll mint this video's NFT and see how much people pay for the original Dave, John, Jerry (mumbles). >> Hey, you know what? We can probably get some good bang for that. Hey it's all about this next Jerry. Jerry, great to have you on, final question as we got this one minute left what's your advice to the people out there that either engaging with these innovative startups, we're going to feature startups every quarter from the in the Amazon ecosystem, they are going to be adding value. What's the advice to the enterprises that are engaging startups, the approach, posture, what's your advice. >> Yeah, when I talk to CIOs and large enterprises, they often are wary like, hey, when do I engage a startup? How, what businesses, and is it risky or low risk? Now I say, just like any career managing, just like any investment you're making in a big, small company you should have a budget or set of projects. And then I want to say to a CIO, Hey, every priority on your wish list, go use the startup, right? I mean, that would be 10 for 10 projects, 10 startups. Probably too much risk for a lot of tech companies. But we would say to most CIOs and executives, look, there are strategic initiatives in your business that you want to accelerate. And I would take the time to invest in one or two startups each quarter selectively, right? Use the time, focus on fewer startups, go deep with them because we can actually be game changers in terms of inflecting your business. And what I mean by that is don't pick too many startups because you can't devote the time, but don't pick zero startups because you're going to be left behind, right? It'd be shorted as a stock by the John, Dave and Jerry hedge fund apparently but pick a handful of startups in your strategic areas, in your top tier three things. These really, these could be accelerators for your career. >> I have to ask you real quick while you're here. We've got a couple minutes left on startups that are building apps. I've seen DevOps and the infrastructure as code movement has gone full mainstream. That's really what we're living right now. That kind of first-generation commercialization of DevOps. Now DevSecOps, what are the trends that you've seen that's different from say a couple of years ago now that we're in COVID around how apps are being built? Is it security? Is it the data integration? What can you share as a key app stack impact (mumbles)? >> Yeah, I think there're two things one is security is always been a top priority. I think that was the only going forward period, right? Security for sure. That's why you said that DevOps, DevSecOps like security is often overlooked but I think increasingly could be more important. The second thing is I think we talked about Dave mentioned earlier just the data around customers, the data on premise or the cloud, and there's a ton of data out there. We keep saying this over and over again like data's new oil, et cetera. It's evolving and not changing because the way we're using data finding data is changing in terms of sources of data we're using and discovering and also speed of data, right? In terms of going from Basser real-time is changing. The speed of business has changed to go faster. So I think these are all things that we're thinking about. So both security and how you use your data faster and better. >> Yeah you were in theCUBE a number of years ago and I remember either John or I asked you about you think Amazon is going to go up the stack and start developing applications and your answer was you know what I think no, I think they're going to enable a new set of disruptors to come in and disrupt the SaaS world. And I think that's largely playing out. And one of the interesting things about Adam Selipsky appointment to the CEO, he comes from Tableau. He really helped Tableau go from that sort of old guard model to an ARR model obviously executed a great exit to Salesforce. And now I see companies like Salesforce and service now and Workday is potential for your scenario to really play out. They've got in my view anyway, outdated pricing models. You look at what's how Snowflake's pricing and the consumption basis, same with Datadog same with Stripe and new startups seem to really be a leading into the consumption-based pricing model. So how do you, what are your thoughts on that? And maybe thoughts on Adam and thoughts on SaaS disruption? >> I think my thesis still holds that. I don't think Selipsky Adam is going to go into the app space aggressively. I think Amazon wants to enable next generation apps and seeing some of the new service that they're doing is they're kind of deconstructing apps, right? They're deconstructing the parts of CRM or e-commerce and they're offering them as services. So I think you're going to see Amazon continue to say, hey we're the core parts of an app like payments or custom prediction or some machine learning things around applications you want to buy bacon, they're going to turn those things to the API and sell those services, right? So you look at things like Stripe, Twilio which are two of the biggest companies out there. They're not apps themselves, they're the components of the app, right? Either e-commerce or messaging communications. So I can see Amazon going down that path. I think Adam is a great choice, right? He was a longterm early AWS exact from the early days latent to your point Dave really helped take Tableau into kind of a cloud business acquired by Salesforce work there for a few years under Benioff the guy who created quote unquote cloud and now him coming home again and back to Amazon. So I think it'll be exciting to see how Adam runs the business. >> And John I think he's the perfect choice because he's got operations chops and he knows how to... He can help the startups disrupt. >> Yeah, and he's been a trusted soldier of Jassy from the beginning, he knows the DNA. He's got some CEO outside experience. I think that was the key he knows. And he's not going to give up Amazon speed, but this is baby, right? So he's got him in charge and he's a trusted lieutenant. >> You think. Yeah, you think he's going to hold the mic? >> Yeah. We got to go. Jerry Chen thank you very much for coming on. Really appreciate it. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on our inaugural cube on cloud AWS startup event. Now for the 10 startups, enjoy the sessions at 12:30 Pacific, we're going to have the closing keynote. I'm John Ferry for Dave Vellante and our special guests, thanks for watching and enjoy the rest of the day and the 10 startups. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
of the most important stories in cloud. Thanks for having me. And they're going to present today it's really great to see Jeremy is the brains behind and partnering with you and great to have you on So the next one we've from the startup market to as AWS brings the cloud to the edge. One of the things that's coming up I mean, that's the bottom line. No better guests to have you Jeff for the past decade or so, going hard in the month or so run up to reinvent So I've got to ask you and one of the things that We've seen that as the move to digital, and sensors on the factory Well, Jeff and the spirit So one of the things you think about He basically nailed the answer. And so the expectation to help you address those use cases You're getting the early days at the from the ground I go, first of all, he's not going to talk of the various 5G providers. and all the interviews. And I think to me, a principal the first time we ever And that's the best thing about and you are just doing your job taking the time to spend And I love to see the and I saw the big news that forward to seeing him again, He is pumping out all the Hey, great to be here, John. One of the things I Well, and I got to say, Michael I got some questions. And so focusing on the fortune the boardrooms that are making And one of the things that we did And the way you did that is that indicate the value the patterns emerge, I want to ask you one of the things you on the patterns that you saw. and again, aligned by the fortune 500. and getting the kind of business return, as the tide is shifting to a and the fourth thing, and this and sharing the McKinsey perspective. on the succession to to be here with you guys. Because in the old days we've at the same time across the globe in the startups to attack these new waves and everything's going to be more kind of in the enterprises as new things develop. and I guess the premise because the way you build your apps and it's going to be that becomes a key part of the And the cloud guys on the What's the operational impact to this? all the bits, you have So the future value of And in the Greylock portfolio Would you trade them for NFTs Jerry? as the NFT, when we do this guys, What's the advice to the enterprises Use the time, focus on fewer startups, I have to ask you real the way we're using data finding data And one of the interesting and seeing some of the new He can help the startups disrupt. And he's not going to going to hold the mic? and the 10 startups.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeremy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike Feinstein | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jerry Chen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Liebow | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Barr | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jerry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael skulk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ben Haynes | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ben Horowitz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$69 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1999 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Ferry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Goldman Sachs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dimitri Sirota, BigID | CUBE Conversation, March 2021
(upbeat music) >> Well good to have you with us here as we continue the AWS startup showcase and we're joined now by the CEO of BigID, Dmitri Sirota. And Dmitri good afternoon to you? How are you doing today? >> I'm pretty good, it's Friday, it's sunny, it's warm, I'm doing well. >> Then that's a good start, yeah. Glad to have you with us here. First off, just about BigID and when you look at I would assume these accolades are, they are quite a showcase for you. Well economic forum technology pioneer. Forbes cloud 100, business insider startup the watch. I mean, you are getting a lot of attention, obviously for... >> Yep. >> And well-deserved, but when you see these kinds of recognitions coming your way- >> Yep. >> First of what does that do to inspire, motivate and fuel this great passion that you have? >> Yeah, look I think all of these recognitions help, I think affirm, I think what we aspire to be right? Provide the preeminent solution for helping organizations understand their data and in so doing, be able to address problems in privacy and protection and perspective. And I think that these recognitions are part of that as our customers, as our partners like AWS. So they're all part of that ad mixture. And I think they contribute to a sense that we're doing some pioneering work, right as they work from the world economic forum recognized. So I think it's important. I think it's healthy. It encourages kind of cooperative spirit at the company. And I think it's, you know, it's very encouraging for us to continue and build. >> So let's talk about BigID, a little bit for our viewers who might not be too familiar. You are a fairly new company, raised 200 million so far, five years of operations coming up on five years. >> Yep. >> But talk about your sweet spot in terms of the variety of services they provided in terms of protection and security. >> Yeah, sure. So we were founded with really this kind of precept that organizations need to have a better understanding of their data. I think when we got started about five years ago. Most organizations had some view of their data, maybe a few of their files, maybe their databases. What changed is the emerging privacy regulations like GDPR and CCPA later forced companies to rethink their approach to data understanding data knowledge, because part of the kind of the core consumption of privacy is that you and me and other individuals have a right to their data the data actually belongs to us. Similar to when you deposit a check in a bank. That money you deposited is yours. If you ever want to withdraw it, the bank has to give it back to you. And in a similar way, these privacy regulations require organizations to be able to give back your data or delete it or do other things. And as it happens there was no real technology to help companies do that, to help companies look across their vast data estates and pick out all the pieces of information all the detritus that could belong to Dimitri. So it could be my password, it could be my social security, it could be my click stream, it could be my IP address, my cookie. And so we developed from the ground up a brand new approach to technology that covers the data center and the cloud, and allow organizations to understand their data at a level of detail that never existed before. And still, I would argue doesn't exist today. Separate from BigID. And we describe that as our foundational data discovery in depth, right? We provide this kind of multidimensional view of your data to understand the content and the context of the information. And what that allows organizations to do is better understand the risk better meet certain regulatory requirements like GDPR and CCPA. But ultimately also get better value from their data. And so what was pioneering about us is not only that level of detail that we provided almost like your iPhone provides you four cameras to look at the world. We provide you kind of four lenses to look at your data. But then on top of that we introduced a platform that allowed you to take action on what you found. And that action could be in the realm of privacy so that you could solve for some of the privacy use cases like data rights or consent or consumer privacy preferences or data protection data security, so that you can remediate. You can do deal with data lifecycle management. You could deal with encryption, et cetera. Or ultimately what we call a data governance or data perspective, this idea of being able to get value from your data but doing so in a privacy and security preserving way. So that's kind of the conception we want to help you know, your data. And then we want to help you act on your data so that your data is both secure. It's both compliant , but ultimately you get value from your data. >> Now we get into this, helping me know my data better because you you've talked about data you know and data you don't right? >> Dimitri: Yeah. >> And you're saying there's a lot more that we don't or a company doesn't know. >> Dimitri: Yeah. >> Than it's aware of. And I find that still kind of striking in this day and age. I mean with kind of the sophistication of tools that we have and different capabilities that I think give us better insight. But I'm still kind of surprised when you're saying there's all a lot of data that companies are housing that they're not even aware of right now. >> They're not and candidly they didn't really want to be for a long, long time. I think the more you know sometimes the more you have to fix, right? So there needed to be a catalyzing event like these privacy regulations to essentially kind of unpack, to force a set of actions because the privacy regulation said, no, no, no you need to know whether you want to or not. So I think a lot of organizations for years and years outside of a couple of narrow fields like HIPAA, PCI unless there was a specific regulation, they didn't want to know too much. And as a consequence there, wasn't really technology to keep up with the explosion in data volumes and data platforms. Right? Think about like AWS didn't exist when a lot of these technologies were first built in the early 2000's. And so we had to kind of completely re-think things. And one thing I'll also kind of highlight is the need or necessity is not just driven by some of these emerging privacy regulations, but it's also driven by the shift to the cloud. Because when you have all your data on a server in a data center in New Jersey, you could feel a false sense of security because you have doors to that data center in New Jersey and you have firewalls to that data center in New Jersey. And if anybody asks you where your sensitive data you could say, it's in New Jersey! But now all of a sudden you move it into the cloud and data becomes the perimeter, right? It's kind of naked and exposed it's out there. And so I think there's a much greater need and urgency because now data is kind of in the ethos in the air. And so organizations are really kind of looking for additional ability for them to both understand contextualize and deal with some of the privacy security and data governance aspects of that data. >> So you're talking about data obviously AWS comes to mind, right? >> Dimitri: Yeah. And the relationship that you have with them it's been a couple of years in the making things are going really well for you and ultimately for your customers. What is it about this particular partnership that you have with AWS that you think has allowed you to bring that even more added value at the end of the day to your customer base? >> Look, our customers are going to AWS because its simplicity to kind of provision their applications, their services, the cost is incredibly attractive, the diversity of capabilities that AWS provides our customers. And so we have a lot of larger and midsize and even smaller organizations that are going to AWS. And it's important for us to be where our customers are. And so if our customers are using Red Sheriff, or using S creator, using dynamo or using Kinesis or using security hub. We have to be there, right? So we've kind of followed that pathway because of they're putting data in those places, part of our job is provide that insight and intelligence to our customers around those data assets, wherever they are. And so we build a set of capabilities and expertise around the broader AWS platform. So that we could argue that we can help you, whether you keep your data in S3 whether you keep it Dynamo, whether you keep it in EMR, RDS, Aurora, Athena the list goes on and on. We want to be that expert partner for you to kind of help you know your data and then tend to take action on your data. >> So the question about data security in general, obviously as you know, there are these major stories of tremendous breach that's right. >> Yep. >> Stayed afterwards, in some cases. >> Bad guys. >> Yeah, really bad guys and bad smart guys, unfortunately and persistent to say the least. How do you work with your clients in an environment like that? Where, you know, these threats are never ending, >> Yep. >> They're becoming more and more complex. And the tools that you have are certainly robust but at the end of the day, it's very difficult. If not impossible to say a 100% bulletproof, right? >> Yeah. >> It's if you are absolutely safe with us. But you still try, you give these insurances because of your sophistication that, should give people some peace of mind. Again, it's a tough battle your in. >> Yeah. So I think the first rule of fight club is that, to solve a problem, you need to know the problem, right? You can't fix what you can't find, right? So if you're unaware that there's a potential compromise in your data, potential risk in your data maybe you have passwords in a certain data store and there's no security around that. You need to know that you have passwords in a certain data store and there's no security around that. >> Because unless you know that first, there's no ability for you to solve it. So the first part of what we do that kind of know your data that K-Y-D, is we help organizations understand what data do they have that potentially is at risk, may violate a regulatory requirement like GDPR or CCPA, things of that sort. So that's kind of the first level of value because you can't solve for something you can't, you're unaware of, right? You need to be able to see it and you need to be able to understand it. And so our ability to kind of both understand your data and understand what it is, why it is, whose it is where it came from, the risk around it lets you take action on that. Now we don't stop there. We don't stop at just helping you kind of find the problem. We also help you understand if there's additional levels of exposure. Do you have access control around that data for instance. If that data is open to the world and you just put a bunch of passwords there or API keys or credentials, that's a problem. So we provide this kind of holistic view into your data and to some of the security controls. And then most importantly, through our application platform our own apps, we provide ways for you to take action on that. And that action could take many forms. It could be about remediating where you delegate to a security owner and say, hey, I want you to delete that data. Or I want you to encrypt that data. It could be something more automated where it just encrypts everything. But again, part of the value and virtue of our platform is that we both help you identify the potential risk points. And then we give you in the form of apps that sit on top of our platform, ways to take action on it, to secure it, to reduce it, to minimize the risk. >> Because these threats are ever evolving. Can you give us a little, maybe inside peek under the tent here, a bit about what you're looking at in terms of products or services down the road here. So if somebody is thinking, okay. What enhanced tools might be at my disposal in the near term or even in the longterm to try and mitigate these risks. Can you give us an idea about some things you guys are working on? >> Yeah. So the biggest thing we're working on I've already kind of hinted at this is really the kind of first in industry platform, in our category companies that look at data and by platform i mean, something like where you can introduce apps. So AWS has a platform. People can introduce additional capabilities on top of AWS. In the data discovery classification arena, that had never been the case because the tools were very, very old. So we're introducing these apps and these apps allow you to take a variety of actions. I've mentioned a few of them, there's retention. You can do encryption, you can do access control, you could do remediation, and you could do breach impact analysis. Each of these apps is kind of an atomic unit of functionality. So there's no different than on your iPhone or your Android phone. You may have an Uber app, when you click on it, all of a sudden your phone looks like an Uber application. You may have an app focused on Salesforce, you click on it, all of a sudden your phone looks like a Salesforce application. And so what we've done is we've kind of taken this kind of data discovery, classification and intelligence mechanism that kind of K-Y-D I referenced. And then we built a whole app platform. And what we're going to start announcing over the coming months, is more and more apps in the field of privacy, in the fields of data security or protection, and even the fields of data value what we call perspective and that's and we're actually coming out with an announcement shortly on this app marketplace. And there'll be BigID building apps, but you know what, there's going to be a lot of third parties building apps. So companies that do intrusion detection and integrations and all kinds of other things are also building apps on BigID. And that's an exciting part of what you're going to see coming from us in the coming weeks. >> Great. Well, thanks for the sneak peek and wait I feel like I just barely scratched the surface of it. Governance, compliance, right? Regulation, you have so many balls in the air but obviously you're juggling them quite well and we wish you continued success, job well done. Thanks, Dimitri. >> Dimitri: Thank you very much for having me. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Well good to have you with us here Friday, it's sunny, it's warm, Glad to have you with us here. And I think it's, you know, So let's talk about BigID, a little bit in terms of the variety we want to help you know, your data. that we don't or a company doesn't know. And I find that still kind of striking the more you have to fix, right? that you have with them to kind of help you know your data obviously as you know, there How do you work with your clients And the tools that you It's if you are You need to know that you have passwords is that we both help you identify about some things you guys are working on? and these apps allow you to and we wish you continued Dimitri: Thank you
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dmitri Sirota | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dimitri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dimitri Sirota | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March 2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
New Jersey | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dmitri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
BigID | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
200 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
first part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first level | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
CCPA | TITLE | 0.96+ |
Android | TITLE | 0.96+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
BigID | TITLE | 0.95+ |
four cameras | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
early 2000's | DATE | 0.95+ |
S creator | TITLE | 0.92+ |
Red Sheriff | TITLE | 0.92+ |
HIPAA | TITLE | 0.89+ |
S3 | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Kinesis | TITLE | 0.87+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.86+ |
first rule | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
about | DATE | 0.8+ |
couple of years | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
Aurora | TITLE | 0.7+ |
four lenses | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
Athena | TITLE | 0.67+ |
RDS | TITLE | 0.65+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
Salesforce | TITLE | 0.58+ |
Dynamo | TITLE | 0.56+ |
CEO | PERSON | 0.56+ |
-D | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
PCI | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.5+ |
dynamo | TITLE | 0.48+ |
EMR | TITLE | 0.48+ |
Forbes cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.35+ |
HOLD_CA_Dimitri Sirota, BigID | CUBE Conversation, March 2021
(upbeat music) >> Well good to have you with us here as we continue the AWS startup showcase and we're joined now by the CEO of BigID, Dmitri Sirota. And Dmitri good afternoon to you? How are you doing today? >> I'm pretty good, it's Friday, it's sunny, it's warm, I'm doing well. >> Then that's a good start, yeah. Glad to have you with us here. First off, just about BigID and when you look at I would assume these accolades are, they are quite a showcase for you. Well economic forum technology pioneer. Forbes cloud 100, business insider startup the watch. I mean, you are getting a lot of attention, obviously for... >> Yep. >> And well-deserved, but when you see these kinds of recognitions coming your way- >> Yep. >> First of what does that do to inspire, motivate and fuel this great passion that you have? >> Yeah, look I think all of these recognitions help, I think affirm, I think what we aspire to be right? Provide the preeminent solution for helping organizations understand their data and in so doing, be able to address problems in privacy and protection and perspective. And I think that these recognitions are part of that as our customers, as our partners like AWS. So they're all part of that ad mixture. And I think they contribute to a sense that we're doing some pioneering work, right as they work from the world economic forum recognized. So I think it's important. I think it's healthy. It encourages kind of cooperative spirit at the company. And I think it's, you know, it's very encouraging for us to continue and build. >> So let's talk about BigID, a little bit for our viewers who might not be too familiar. You are a fairly new company, raised 200 million so far, five years of operations coming up on five years. >> Yep. >> But talk about your sweet spot in terms of the variety of services they provided in terms of protection and security. >> Yeah, sure. So we were founded with really this kind of precept that organizations need to have a better understanding of their data. I think when we got started about five years ago. Most organizations had some view of their data, maybe a few of their files, maybe their databases. What changed is the emerging privacy regulations like GDPR and CCPA later forced companies to rethink their approach to data understanding data knowledge, because part of the kind of the core consumption of privacy is that you and me and other individuals have a right to their data the data actually belongs to us. Similar to when you deposit a check in a bank. That money you deposited is yours. If you ever want to withdraw it, the bank has to give it back to you. And in a similar way, these privacy regulations require organizations to be able to give back your data or delete it or do other things. And as it happens there was no real technology to help companies do that, to help companies look across their vast data estates and pick out all the pieces of information all the detritus that could belong to Dimitri. So it could be my password, it could be my social security, it could be my click stream, it could be my IP address, my cookie. And so we developed from the ground up a brand new approach to technology that covers the data center and the cloud, and allow organizations to understand their data at a level of detail that never existed before. And still, I would argue doesn't exist today. Separate from BigID. And we describe that as our foundational data discovery in depth, right? We provide this kind of multidimensional view of your data to understand the content and the context of the information. And what that allows organizations to do is better understand the risk better meet certain regulatory requirements like GDPR and CCPA. But ultimately also get better value from their data. And so what was pioneering about us is not only that level of detail that we provided almost like your iPhone provides you four cameras to look at the world. We provide you kind of four lenses to look at your data. But then on top of that we introduced a platform that allowed you to take action on what you found. And that action could be in the realm of privacy so that you could solve for some of the privacy use cases like data rights or consent or consumer privacy preferences or data protection data security, so that you can remediate. You can do deal with data lifecycle management. You could deal with encryption, et cetera. Or ultimately what we call a data governance or data perspective, this idea of being able to get value from your data but doing so in a privacy and security preserving way. So that's kind of the conception we want to help you know, your data. And then we want to help you act on your data so that your data is both secure. It's both compliant , but ultimately you get value from your data. >> Now we get into this, helping me know my data better because you you've talked about data you know and data you don't right? >> Dimitri: Yeah. >> And you're saying there's a lot more that we don't or a company doesn't know. >> Dimitri: Yeah. >> Than it's aware of. And I find that still kind of striking in this day and age. I mean with kind of the sophistication of tools that we have and different capabilities that I think give us better insight. But I'm still kind of surprised when you're saying there's all a lot of data that companies are housing that they're not even aware of right now. >> They're not and candidly they didn't really want to be for a long, long time. I think the more you know sometimes the more you have to fix, right? So there needed to be a catalyzing event like these privacy regulations to essentially kind of unpack, to force a set of actions because the privacy regulation said, no, no, no you need to know whether you want to or not. So I think a lot of organizations for years and years outside of a couple of narrow fields like HIPAA, PCI unless there was a specific regulation, they didn't want to know too much. And as a consequence there, wasn't really technology to keep up with the explosion in data volumes and data platforms. Right? Think about like AWS didn't exist when a lot of these technologies were first built in the early 2000's. And so we had to kind of completely re-think things. And one thing I'll also kind of highlight is the need or necessity is not just driven by some of these emerging privacy regulations, but it's also driven by the shift to the cloud. Because when you have all your data on a server in a data center in New Jersey, you could feel a false sense of security because you have doors to that data center in New Jersey and you have firewalls to that data center in New Jersey. And if anybody asks you where your sensitive data you could say, it's in New Jersey! But now all of a sudden you move it into the cloud and data becomes the perimeter, right? It's kind of naked and exposed it's out there. And so I think there's a much greater need and urgency because now data is kind of in the ethos in the air. And so organizations are really kind of looking for additional ability for them to both understand contextualize and deal with some of the privacy security and data governance aspects of that data. >> So you're talking about data obviously AWS comes to mind, right? >> Dimitri: Yeah. And the relationship that you have with them it's been a couple of years in the making things are going really well for you and ultimately for your customers. What is it about this particular partnership that you have with AWS that you think has allowed you to bring that even more added value at the end of the day to your customer base? >> Look, our customers are going to AWS because its simplicity to kind of provision their applications, their services, the cost is incredibly attractive, the diversity of capabilities that AWS provides our customers. And so we have a lot of larger and midsize and even smaller organizations that are going to AWS. And it's important for us to be where our customers are. And so if our customers are using Red Sheriff, or using S creator, using dynamo or using Kinesis or using security hub. We have to be there, right? So we've kind of followed that pathway because of they're putting data in those places, part of our job is provide that insight and intelligence to our customers around those data assets, wherever they are. And so we build a set of capabilities and expertise around the broader AWS platform. So that we could argue that we can help you, whether you keep your data in S3 whether you keep it Dynamo, whether you keep it in EMR, RDS, Aurora, Athena the list goes on and on. We want to be that expert partner for you to kind of help you know your data and then tend to take action on your data. >> So the question about data security in general, obviously as you know, there are these major stories of tremendous breach that's right. >> Yep. >> Stayed afterwards, in some cases. >> Bad guys. >> Yeah, really bad guys and bad smart guys, unfortunately and persistent to say the least. How do you work with your clients in an environment like that? Where, you know, these threats are never ending, >> Yep. >> They're becoming more and more complex. And the tools that you have are certainly robust but at the end of the day, it's very difficult. If not impossible to say a 100% bulletproof, right? >> Yeah. >> It's if you are absolutely safe with us. But you still try, you give these insurances because of your sophistication that, should give people some peace of mind. Again, it's a tough battle your in. >> Yeah. So I think the first rule of fight club is that, to solve a problem, you need to know the problem, right? You can't fix what you can't find, right? So if you're unaware that there's a potential compromise in your data, potential risk in your data maybe you have passwords in a certain data store and there's no security around that. You need to know that you have passwords in a certain data store and there's no security around that. >> Because unless you know that first, there's no ability for you to solve it. So the first part of what we do that kind of know your data that K-Y-D, is we help organizations understand what data do they have that potentially is at risk, may violate a regulatory requirement like GDPR or CCPA, things of that sort. So that's kind of the first level of value because you can't solve for something you can't, you're unaware of, right? You need to be able to see it and you need to be able to understand it. And so our ability to kind of both understand your data and understand what it is, why it is, whose it is where it came from, the risk around it lets you take action on that. Now we don't stop there. We don't stop at just helping you kind of find the problem. We also help you understand if there's additional levels of exposure. Do you have access control around that data for instance. If that data is open to the world and you just put a bunch of passwords there or API keys or credentials, that's a problem. So we provide this kind of holistic view into your data and to some of the security controls. And then most importantly, through our application platform our own apps, we provide ways for you to take action on that. And that action could take many forms. It could be about remediating where you delegate to a security owner and say, hey, I want you to delete that data. Or I want you to encrypt that data. It could be something more automated where it just encrypts everything. But again, part of the value and virtue of our platform is that we both help you identify the potential risk points. And then we give you in the form of apps that sit on top of our platform, ways to take action on it, to secure it, to reduce it, to minimize the risk. >> Because these threats are ever evolving. Can you give us a little, maybe inside peek under the tent here, a bit about what you're looking at in terms of products or services down the road here. So if somebody is thinking, okay. What enhanced tools might be at my disposal in the near term or even in the longterm to try and mitigate these risks. Can you give us an idea about some things you guys are working on? >> Yeah. So the biggest thing we're working on I've already kind of hinted at this is really the kind of first in industry platform, in our category companies that look at data and by platform i mean, something like where you can introduce apps. So AWS has a platform. People can introduce additional capabilities on top of AWS. In the data discovery classification arena, that had never been the case because the tools were very, very old. So we're introducing these apps and these apps allow you to take a variety of actions. I've mentioned a few of them, there's retention. You can do encryption, you can do access control, you could do remediation, and you could do breach impact analysis. Each of these apps is kind of an atomic unit of functionality. So there's no different than on your iPhone or your Android phone. You may have an Uber app, when you click on it, all of a sudden your phone looks like an Uber application. You may have an app focused on Salesforce, you click on it, all of a sudden your phone looks like a Salesforce application. And so what we've done is we've kind of taken this kind of data discovery, classification and intelligence mechanism that kind of K-Y-D I referenced. And then we built a whole app platform. And what we're going to start announcing over the coming months, is more and more apps in the field of privacy, in the fields of data security or protection, and even the fields of data value what we call perspective and that's and we're actually coming out with an announcement shortly on this app marketplace. And there'll be BigID building apps, but you know what, there's going to be a lot of third parties building apps. So companies that do intrusion detection and integrations and all kinds of other things are also building apps on BigID. And that's an exciting part of what you're going to see coming from us in the coming weeks. >> Great. Well, thanks for the sneak peek and wait I feel like I just barely scratched the surface of it. Governance, compliance, right? Regulation, you have so many balls in the air but obviously you're juggling them quite well and we wish you continued success, job well done. Thanks, Dimitri. >> Dimitri: Thank you very much for having me. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Well good to have you with us here Friday, it's sunny, it's warm, Glad to have you with us here. And I think it's, you know, So let's talk about BigID, a little bit in terms of the variety we want to help you know, your data. that we don't or a company doesn't know. And I find that still kind of striking the more you have to fix, right? that you have with them to kind of help you know your data obviously as you know, there How do you work with your clients And the tools that you It's if you are You need to know that you have passwords is that we both help you identify about some things you guys are working on? and these apps allow you to and we wish you continued Dimitri: Thank you
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dmitri Sirota | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
March 2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dimitri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
New Jersey | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dmitri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
BigID | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
200 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
first part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first level | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
CCPA | TITLE | 0.96+ |
Android | TITLE | 0.96+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
four cameras | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
early 2000's | DATE | 0.95+ |
BigID | TITLE | 0.94+ |
S creator | TITLE | 0.92+ |
Red Sheriff | TITLE | 0.92+ |
Sirota | PERSON | 0.9+ |
HIPAA | TITLE | 0.89+ |
S3 | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Kinesis | TITLE | 0.87+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.86+ |
first rule | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
about | DATE | 0.8+ |
couple of years | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
Aurora | TITLE | 0.7+ |
four lenses | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
Athena | TITLE | 0.67+ |
RDS | TITLE | 0.65+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
Salesforce | TITLE | 0.58+ |
Dynamo | TITLE | 0.56+ |
CEO | PERSON | 0.56+ |
-D | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
PCI | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.5+ |
dynamo | TITLE | 0.48+ |
EMR | TITLE | 0.48+ |
Forbes cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
Craig Hyde, Splunk | Leading with Observability | January 2021
>> Narrator: From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto in Boston connecting with that leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE Conversation. >> Hello and welcome to this special CUBE Conversation. I'm John Furrier, your host. We're here for a special series, Leading with Observability, and this segment is: End-to-end observability drives great digital experiences. We've got a great guest here, Craig Hyde, senior director of product management for Splunk. Craig, great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> And thanks for having me. This is great. >> So this series, Leading with Observability is a super hot topic obviously with cloud native. In the pandemic, COVID-19 has really kind of shown cloud native trend has been a tailwind for people who invested in it, who have been architecting for cloud on premises where data is a key part of that value proposition and then there's people who haven't been doing it. So, and out of this trend, the word observability has become a hot segment. And for us insiders in the industry, we know observability is just kind of network management on steroids in the cloud, so it's about data and all this. But at the end of the day, there's value that's enabled from observability. So I want to talk to you about that value that's enabled in the experience of the end user whether it's in a modern application or user inside the enterprise. Tell us what you think about this end user perspective. >> Sure, yeah thanks a lot for that intro. And I would actually argue that observability wouldn't even just be machine data or network data, it's more of a broader context where you can see everything that's going on inside the application and the digital user experience. From a user experience or a digital experience management perspective, I believe the metrics that you pull from such a thing are the most useful and ubiquitous metrics that you have and visibility in all of technology. And when done right, it can tell you what the actual end result of all this technology that you're piecing together, the end result of what's getting delivered to the user, both quantitatively and qualitatively. So, my background, I actually started a company in this domain. It was called Rigor and we focused purely on looking at user experience and digital experience. And the idea was that, you know, this was 10 years ago, we were just thinking, look, 10 years from now, more and more people are going to do business digitally, they're going to work more digitally and at the same time we saw the legacy data centers being shut down and things were moving to the cloud. So we said, look, the future is in the users, and where it all comes together is on the user's desktop or on their phone, and so we set out to focus specifically on that space. Fast forward 10 years, we're now a part of Splunk and we're really excited to bolt this onto an overall observability strategy. You know, I believe that it's becoming more and more popular, like you said, with the pandemic and COVID-19, it was already on a tear from a digital perspective, the adoption was going through the roof and people were doing more and more remote, they were buying more and more offline, but the pandemic has just pushed it through the roof. And I mean, wow, like the digital business genie's out of the bottle and there's no putting it back now. But, you know, there's also other things that are driving the need for this and the importance of it and part of it comes with the way technology is growing. It's becoming much more complex in terms of moving parts. Where an app used to be run off three different tiers in a data center, now it could be across hundreds of machines and opaque networks, opaque data centers all over the world, and the only time you often see things, how they come together, is on the user's desktop. And so that's where we really think you got to start from the user experience and work back. And, you know, all the drive in computing is all about making things better, faster and cheaper, but without this context of the user, often the customer and the experience gets left out from reaping the rewards from all these gains. So that's sort of like encapsulates my overall view of the space and why we got into it and why I'm so excited about it. >> Well Craig, I got to ask on a personal level. I mean, you look at what happened with the pandemic, I mean, you're a pioneer, you had a vision. Folks that are on the entrepreneurial side say, hey digital businesses is coming and they get it and it's slowly gets known in the real world, becomes more certain, but with the pandemic, it just happened all of a sudden so fast for everybody because everyone's impacted. Teachers, students, families, work, everyone's at home. So the entire user experience was impacted in the entire world. What was going through your mind when you saw all this happening and you see the winners obviously were people had invested in cloud native and data-driven technologies, what was your take on all this when you saw this coming? >> Well, the overall trend has been going on for decades, right? And so the direction of it isn't that surprising, but the magnitude and the acceleration, there's some stats out there from Forbes where the e-commerce adoption doubled within the first six months of the pandemic. So we're talking, you know, 10, 12 years of things ticking up and then within six months, a doubling of the adoption of e-commerce. And so like anybody else, you first freeze and say, what does this mean? But when people start working remote and people start ordering things from Amazon and all the other websites, it's quick to see like, aha! It no longer matters what chairs somebody is sitting in when they're doing work or that they're close to a store and you have a physical storefront when you're trying to buy something, it's all about that digital experience and it needs to be ubiquitous. So it's been interesting to see the change over the past few months for sure. But again, it doesn't change the trend, it just magnified it and I don't see it going back anytime soon. >> Yeah I mean, digital transformation has always been a buzz word that everyone kind of uses as a way to kind of talk about the big picture. >> Right. >> It's actually transforming and there's also share shifts that happen in every transformation, in any market shift. Obviously that's happening with cloud. Cloud native edge is becoming super important. In all of these, and by the way, in all the applications that sit on that infrastructure which is now infrastructure as code, has a data requirement that observability piece becomes super critical, not just from identifying and resolving, but also for training machine learning and AI, right? So, again, you have this new flywheel observability that's really at the heart of digital transformation. What should companies think about when they associate observability to digital transformation as they're sitting around whether they're CXOs or CSOs or solution architects going, okay, how does observability plug into my plans? >> Yeah, absolutely. I mean, my recommendation and the approach that I would take is that you want to start with the end in mind and it's all about how you set your goals when you're setting out in getting into digital transformation. And, you know, the late Steve Jobs, to borrow one of his quotes, he said that you have to start with the customer experience in mind and work backwards to the technology. And so I think that applies when you get into an observability strategy. So without understanding what the actual user experience is, you don't have a good enough yardstick to go out there and start working towards. So availability on a server or CPU time or transaction time in a database, like, those are all great, but without the context of what is the goal you're actually going after, it's kind of useless. So, like I said, it's not uptime, it's not server time, it's not any of that stuff, and it's user experience and these things are different. So they're like visual metrics, right? So what a user sees, because all kinds of things are going on in the background, but if it can see that the person can see and their experience is that they're getting some kind of response from the machine, then that's how you measure where the end point is and what the overall goal is. And so like to keep kind of going on with that, it's like you start with the end in mind, you use that end to set your goals, you use that domain and that visibility to troubleshoot faster. So when the calls start rolling in then they say, hey, I'm stuck at home and I'm on a slow internet connection, I can't get on the app and core IT is taking a phone call, You can quickly look and instrument that user and see exactly what they're seeing. So when you're troubleshooting, you're looking at the data from their perspective and then working backwards to the technology. >> That's super exciting. I want to get your thoughts on that. So just to double down on that because I think this highlights the trend that we were just talking about. But I'll break it down into three areas that I see happening in the marketplace. Number one, availability and performance. That's on everyone's mind. You just hit that, right? Number two, integrations. There's more integrations going on within platforms or tools or systems, whether it's an API over here, people are working together digitally, right? And you're seeing e-commerce. And third is the user patterns and the expectations are changing. So when you unpack those kinds of like trends, there's features of observability underneath each. Could you talk about that because I think that seems to be the common pattern that I'm seeing? Okay, high availability, okay, check. Everyone has to have that. Almost table stakes. But it's hard when you're scaling, right? And then integrations, all kinds of API is being slinged around. You've got microservices, you've got Kubernetes, people are integrating data flows, control planes, whatever, and then finally users. They want new things. New patterns emerge, which is new data. >> Yeah, absolutely. And to just kind of talk about that, it reminds me of like a Maslow's hierarchy of needs of visibility, right? Like, okay, the machine is on, check. Like you said, it's table stakes, make sure it's up and running. That's great. Then you want to see sort of the applications that are running on the machine, how they're talking to each other, are other components that you're making API calls to, are they timing out or are they breaking things? And so you get that visibility of like, okay, they're on, what's going on top of those machines are inside of them or in the containers or the virtual machines or whatever segment of computing that you're looking at, And then that cherry on top, the highest point is like, how is that stack of technology serving your customer? How's it serving the user and what's the experience? So those are sort of the three levels that we kind of look at when we're thinking of user experience. And so, it's a different way to look at it, but it's sort of the way that kind of we see the world is that three tier, that three layer cake. >> It's interesting. >> And you need all the layers. >> It's super relevant. And again, it's better together, but you can mix and match and have product in there. So I want to get into the Splunk solution. You guys have the digital experience monitoring solution. Can you explain what that is and how that fits into all this and what's in it for the customers, what's the benefit? >> Right, sure. So with the digital experience monitoring and the platform that we have, we're giving people the ability to basically do what I was talking about, where it enables you to take a look at what the user's experience are and pull metrics and then correlate them from the user all the way through the technical journey to the back end, through the different tiers of the application and so on. So that technology is called real user monitoring where we instrument the users. And then we also layer in synthetic monitoring which is the sort of robot users that are always on for when you're in lower level environments and you want to see, you know, what experience is going to look like when you push out new software, or when nobody's on the application, did something break? So a couple of those two together and then we feed that into our overall observability platform that's fed with machine data, we have all the metrics from all the components that you're looking at in that single pane of glass. And the idea is that we're also bringing you not only just the metrics and the events from logs and all the happenings, but we're also trying to help tease out some of these problems for you. So many problems that happen in technology have happened before, and we've got a catalog with our optimization platform of 300 plus things that go wrong when webpages or web applications or API calls start acting funky. And so we can provide, based on our intelligence that's built into the platform, basically run books for people to fix things faster and build those playbooks into the release process so you don't break the applications to begin with and you can set flags to where people understand what performance is before when it's being delivered to the customer, and if there are problems, let's fix them before we break the experience and lose the trust of the user. So again, it's the metrics from the stats that are coming across the wire of everything all the way to the users, it's the events from the logs that are coming in so you can see context, and then it's that user experience, it's a trace level data from where you can double click into each of the tiers and say, like, what's going on in here? What's going on in the browser? What's going on in the application? What's going on in the backend? And so you can sort of pool all that together in a single pane of glass and find problems faster, fix them faster and prevent users from having problems to begin with. And to do this properly, you really need it all under one roof and so that's why we're so excited to bring this all together. >> Yeah, I've been sitting on theCUBE for 10 years now. We've been 11 years, on our 11th year doing theCUBE. Digital you can measure everything. So why not? There should be no debate if done properly. So that brings up this whole concept that you guys are talking about full fidelity. Can you just take a minute to explain what that is? What is full fidelity mean? >> Sure, you know, full fidelity really comes down to a lot about these traces. So when we talk about metrics, logs and traces, it's all about getting all the activity that goes on in an application and looking at it. So when you or I interact with our company's app online and there's problems, that the person who's going to fix this problem, they can actually see specifically me. They can look at my experience and look at what it would look like in my browser, you know, what were all the services that I was interacting with and what was going on in the application, what code was being called, what services were being called, and look at specifically me as opposed to an aggregate of all the domains all put together. And it really is important from a troubleshooting standpoint. It's really important from an understanding of the actuals because without full fidelity and capturing all of the data, you're kind of going, you know, you're taking guesses and it eliminates a lot of the guesswork. And so that's something that's special with our platform is that ability to have the full fidelity. >> When does a client, a customer not have full fidelity? I might think I have it, someone sold me a product, What's the tell sign that I don't have full fidelity? >> Oh yeah, well with observability, there's a lot of tricks in the game. And so you see a lot of summary data that looks like, hey, this is that one call, but usually it's knitted together from a bunch of different calls. So that summary data just from, because this stuff takes up a lot of storage and there's a lot of problems with scale, and so when you might see something that looks like it's this call, it's actually like, in general, when a call like this happens, this is what it looks like. And so you've got to say like, is this the exact call? And, you know, it makes a big difference from a troubleshooting perspective and it's really hard to implement and that's something that Splunk's very good at, right? It's data at scale. It's the 800 pound gorilla in collecting and slicing apart machine data. So like, you have to have something of that scale in order to ingest all this information. It's a hard problem for sure. >> Yeah, totally. And I appreciate that. While I got you here, you're an expert, I got to ask you about Open Telemetry. We've heard that term kicked around. What does that mean? Is it an open source thing, is it an open framework? What is Open Telemetry and what does it mean for your customers or the marketplace? >> Yeah, I think of Open Telemetry as finally creating a standard for how we're collecting data from applications across AP- In the past, it's been onesie-twosie, here and there each company coming up with it themselves and there are never any standards of how to look at transactions across data, across applications and across tiers. And so Open Telemetry is the attempt and it's a consortium, so there's many people involved in pushing this together, but think of like a W3C, which creates the standards for how websites operate, and without it, the web wouldn't be what it is today. And now Open Telemetry is coming behind and doing that same thing from an observability standpoint. So you're not just totally locked into one vendor in the way that they do it and you're held hostage to only looking at that visibility. We're trying to set the standards to lower the barrier of entry into getting to application performance monitoring, network performance monitoring and just getting that telemetry where there are standards across the board. And so it's an open source project. We commit to it, and it's a really important project for observability in general. >> So does that speak to like, the whole more data you have, the less blind spots you might have? Is that the same concept? Is that some of the thinking behind this? >> It enables you to get more data faster. Now, if you think about, if there are no standards and there are no rules on the road and everybody can get on the road and they can decide if they want to drive in the left lane or the right lane today, it makes getting places a lot harder. And the same is true with Open Telemetry. without the standards of what, you know, the naming conventions, where you instrument, how you instrument, it becomes very hard to put some things in a single pane of glass because they just look differently everywhere. And so that's the idea behind it. >> Well Craig, great to have you on. You're super smart on this, and Leading with Observability, it's a hot topic. It's super cool and relevant right now with digital transformation as companies are looking to rearchitect and change how they're going to flip the script on software development, modern applications, modern infrastructure, edge, all of this is on top of mind of everyone's thing on their plans. And we certainly want to have you back in some of our conversations that we have around this on our editorial side as well with when we have these clubhouses we are going to start doing a lot of those. We definitely want to bring you in. I'll give you a final word here. Tell us what you're most excited about. Put the commercial for Splunk. Why Splunk? Why you guys are excited. Take a minute to get the plug in. >> It's so easy. Splunk has the base to make this possible. Splunk is, like I said, it's an 800 pound gorilla in machine data and taking in data at scale. And when you start going off into the observability abyss, the really, really hard part about it is having the scale to not only go broad in the levels of technology that you can collect, but also go deep. And that depth, when we talked about that full fidelity, it's really important when you get down to brass tacks and you start implementing changes and troubleshooting things and turning that data that you have in to doing, so understanding what you can do with it. And Splunk is fully committed to going, not only broad to get everything under one roof, but also deep so that you can make all of the information that you collect actionable and useful. And it's something that I haven't seen anybody even attempt and I'm really excited to be a part of building towards that vision. >> Well, I've been covering Splunk for, man, many, many years. 10 years plus, I think, since it's been founded, and really the growth and the vision and the mission still is the same. Leveraging data, making use of it, unlocking the power of data as it evolves and there's more of it. And it gets more complicated when data is involved in the user experience end-to-end from cybersecurity to user flows and new expectations. So congratulations. Great product. Thanks for coming on and sharing. >> Thanks again for having us. >> Okay, this is John Furrier in theCUBE. Leading with Observability is the theme of this series and this topic was End-to-end observability to enable great digital experiences. Thanks for watching. (lighthearted music)
SUMMARY :
all around the world, and this segment is: And thanks for having me. in the experience of the end user and the only time you often see things, and you see the winners obviously and all the other websites, about the big picture. and by the way, in all the applications but if it can see that the person can see and the expectations are changing. that are running on the machine, and how that fits into all this and the platform that we have, that you guys are talking and it eliminates a lot of the guesswork. and so when you might see something I got to ask you about Open Telemetry. And so Open Telemetry is the and everybody can get on the road Well Craig, great to have you on. but also deep so that you can and really the growth and is the theme of this series
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Craig Hyde | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
January 2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Craig | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Jobs | PERSON | 0.99+ |
11 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
11th year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
800 pound | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rigor | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
one call | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
300 plus things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
COVID-19 | OTHER | 0.97+ |
three different tiers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each company | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Open Telemetry | TITLE | 0.97+ |
one vendor | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
three areas | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Splunk | PERSON | 0.97+ |
hundreds of machines | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
three levels | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first six months | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
three layer | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
CUBE Conversation | EVENT | 0.91+ |
single pane | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
one roof | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.87+ |
Leading with Observability | TITLE | 0.86+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
COVID-19 | EVENT | 0.8+ |
12 years | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
three tier | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
Number two | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
a minute | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.69+ |
past few months | DATE | 0.62+ |
Forbes | ORGANIZATION | 0.58+ |
10 years | DATE | 0.57+ |
Conversation | EVENT | 0.52+ |
Maslow | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
tiers | QUANTITY | 0.43+ |
Debanjan Saha, Google Cloud | October 2020
(gentle music) >> From the cube studios in Palo Alto and Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is a Cube conversation. >> With Snowflake's, enormously successful IPO, it's clear that data warehousing in the cloud has come of age and a few companies know more about data and analytics than Google. Hi, I'm Paul Gillen. This is a cube conversation. And today we're going to talk about data warehousing and data analytics in the cloud. Google BigQuery, of course, is a popular, fully managed server less data warehouse that enables rapid SQL queries and interactive analysis of massive data sets. This summer, Google previewed BigQuery Omni, which essentially brings the capabilities of BigQuery to additional platforms including Amazon web services and soon Microsoft Azure. It's all part of Google's multicloud strategy. No one knows more about this strategy than Debanjan Saha, General Manager and Vice President of engineering for data analytics and Google cloud. And he joins me today. Debanjan, thanks so much for joining me. >> Paul, nice to meet you and thank you for having me today. >> So it's clear the data warehousing is now part of many enterprise data strategies. How has the rise of cloud change the way organizations are using data science in your view? >> Well, I mean, you know, the cloud definitely is a big enabler of data warehousing and data science, as you mentioned. I mean, it has enabled things that people couldn't do on-prem, for example, if you think about data science, the key ingredient of data science, before you can start anything is access to data and you need massive amount of data in order to build the right model that you want to use. And this was a big problem on-prem because people are always thinking about what data to keep, what to discard. That's not an issue in cloud. You can keep as much of data as you want, and that has been a big boon for data science. And it's not only your data, you can also have access to other data your, for example, your partner's data, public data sets and many other things that people have access to right? That's number one, number two of course, it's a very compute intensive operation and you know, large enterprises of course can afford them build a large data center and bring in lots of tens of thousands of CPU codes, GPU codes, TPU codes whatever have you, but it is difficult especially for smaller enterprises to have access to that amount of computing power which is very very important for data science. Cloud makes it easy. I mean, you know, it has in many ways democratize the use of data science and not only the big enterprises everyone can take advantage of the power of the computing power that various different cloud vendors make it available on their platform. And the third, not to overlook that, cloud also makes it available to customers and users, lots of various different data science platform, for example, Google's own TensorFlow and you have many other platforms Spark being one example of that, right? Both a cloud native platform as well as open source platforms, which is very very useful for people using data science and managed to open source, Spark also makes it very very affordable. And all of these things have contributed to massive boon in data science in the cloud and from my perspective. >> Now, of course we've seen over the last seven months a rush to the cloud triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. How has that played out in the analytics field? Do you see any longterm changes to, to the landscape? The way customers are using analytics as a result of what's happened these last seven months? >> You know, I think as you know about kind of a digitization of our business is happening over a long period of time, right? And people are using AIML analytics in increasing numbers. What I've seen because of COVID-19 that trend has accelerated both in terms of people moving to cloud, and in terms of they're using advanced analytics and AIML and they have to do that, right? Pretty much every business is kind of leaning heavily on their data infrastructure in order to gain insight of what's coming next. A lot of the models that people are used to, is no longer valid things are changing very very rapidly right? So in order to survive and thrive people have to lean on data, lean on analytics to figure out what's coming around the corner. And that trend in my view is only going to accelerate. It's not going to go the other way round. >> One of the problems with cloud databases, We often hear complaints about is that there's so many of them. Do you see any resolution to that proliferation? >> Well, you know, I do think a one size does not fit all right. So it is important to have choice. It's important to have specialization. And that's why you see a lot of cloud databases. I don't think the number of cloud databases is going to go down. What I do expect to happen. People are going to use interoperable data formats. They are going to use open API so that it's very, very portable as people want to move from one database to another. The way I think the convergence is going to come is two ways, One, you know, a lot of databases, for example, use Federation. If you look at BigQuery, for example, you can start with BigQuery, but with BigQuery, you can have also access to data in other databases, not only in GCP or Google cloud but also in AWS with BigQuery Omni, for example, right? So that provides a layer of Federation, which kind of create convergence with respect, to weighing various different data assets people may have. I have also seen with, for example, with Looker, you know creation of enterprise wide data models and data API is gives people a platform so that they can build their custom data app and data solutions on top up and even from data API. Those I believe are going to be the points of convergence. I think data is probably going to be in different databases because different databases do different things well, that does not mean people wouldn't have access to all their data through one API or one set of models. >> Well, since we're on the subject of BigQuery. Now this summer, you introduced BigQuery Omni which is a database data warehouse, essentially a version of BigQuery that can query data in other cloud platforms, what, what is the strategy there? And what is the customer reaction been so far? >> Well, I mean, you know as you probably have seen talking to customers more than 80% of the customers that we talk to use multiple clouds and that trend is probably not going to change. I mean, it happens for various different reasons sometime because of compliance sometimes because they want to have different tools and different platform sometime because of M and a, we are a big believer of multi-cloud strategy and that's what we are trying to do with BigQuery Omni. We do realize people have choices. Customers will have their data in various different places and we will take our analytics wherever the data is. So customers won't have to worry about moving data from one place to another., and that's what we are trying to do with BigQuery Omni you know, going to see, you know for example, with Anthos, we have created a platform over which you can build this video as different data stacks and applications, which spans multiple clouds. I believe we are going to see more of that. And BigQuery Omni is just the beginning. >> And how have your customers reacted to that announcement. >> Oh deep! They reacted very, very positively. This is the first time they have a major cloud vendor offering a fully managed server less data warehouse platform on multiple clouds. And as I mentioned, I mean we have many customers who have some of their data assets for example, in GCP, they really love BigQuery. And they also have for example, applications running on AWS and Azure. And today the only option they have is to essentially shuttle their data between various different clouds in order to gain insight across the collective pool of data sets that they have, with BigQuery, Omni, they all tended to do that. They can keep their data wherever it is. They can still join across that data and get insights irrespective of which cloud their data is. >> You recently wrote on Forbes about the shortage of data scientists and the need to make data analytics more accessible to the average business user. What is Google doing in that respect? >> So we strongly, I mean, you know one of our goals is to make the data and insight from data available to everybody in the business right? That is the way you can democratize the use of analytics and AIML. And you know, one way to do that is to teach everybody R or Python or some specific tools but that's going to take a long time. So our approach is make the power of data analytics and AI AML available to our users, no matter what tools they're comfortable with. So for example, if you look at a B Q ML BigQuery ML, we have made it possible for our users who like SQL very much to use the power of ML without having to learn anything else or without having to move their data anywhere else. We have a lot of business users for example, who prefer X prefer spreadsheets and, you know, we've connected sheets. We have made the spreadsheet interface available on top of BigQuery, and they can use the power of BigQuery without having to learn anything else. Better yet we recently launched a BigQuery Q and A. And what Q and A allows you to do is to use natural language on top of big query data, right? So the goal, I mean, if you can do that that I think is the Nevada where people, anyone for example, somebody working in a call center talking to a customer can use a simple query to figure out what's going on with the bill, for example, right? And we believe that if we can democratize the use of data, insight and analytics that not only going to accelerate the digital transformation of the businesses, it's also going to grow consumption. And that's good for both the users, as well as business. >> Now you bought Looker last year, what would you say is different about the way Google is coming out the data analytics market from the way other cloud vendors are doing it. >> So Looker is a great addition to already strong portfolio of products that we have but you know, a lot of people think about Looker as a business intelligence platform. It's actually much more than that. What is unique about Looker is the semantic model that Looker can build on top of data assets, govern semantic model Looker can build on top of data assets, which may be in BigQuery maybe in cloud SQL maybe, you know, in other cloud for example, in Redshift or SQL data warehouse. And once you have the data model, you can create a data API and essentially an ID or integrated development environment on top of which you can build your custom workflows. You can build your custom dashboard you can build your custom data application. And that is, I think, where we are moving. I don't think people want the old dashboards anymore. They want their data experience to be immersive within the workflow and within the context in which they are using the data. And that's where I see Lot of customers are now using the power of Looker and BigQuery and other platform that we have and building this custom data apps. And what again, like BigQuery, Looker is also multi-platform it supports multiple data warehouses and databases and that kind of aligns very well with our philosophy of having an open platform that is multicloud as well as hybrid. >> Certainly, with Anthos and with BigQuery Omni, you demonstrated your commitment on P cloud, but not all cloud vendors have an interest in being multicloud. Do you see any, any change that standoff and are you really in a position to influence it? >> Absolutely. I think more than us it's a customer who is going to influence that, right? And almost every customer I talk to, they don't want to be in a walled garden. They want to be an open platform where they have the choice they have the flexibility and I believe these customers are going to push essentially the adoption of platforms, which are open and multicloud. And, you know, I believe over time the successful platforms have to be open platform. And the closed platform if you look at history has never been very successful, right? And you know, I sincerely think that we are on the right path and we are on the side of customers in this philosophy. >> Final question. What's your most important priority right now? >> You know, I wake up everyday thinking about how can you make our customer successful? And the best way to make our customer successful is to make sure that they can get business outcome out of the data that they have. And that's what we are trying to do. We want to accelerate time to value to data, you know, so that people can keep their data in a governed way. They can gain insight by using the tools that we can provide them. A lot of them, we have used internally for many years and those tools are now available to our customers. We also believe we need to democratize the use of analytics and AIML. And that's why we are trying to give customers tools where they don't have to learn a lot of new things and new skills in order to use them. And if we can do them successfully I think we are going to help our customers get more value out of their data and create businesses which can use that value. I'll give you a couple of quick examples. I mean, for example, if you look at Home Depot, they use our platform to improve the predictability of the inventory by two X. If you look at, for example HSBC, they have been able to use our platform to detect financial fraud 10 X faster. If you look at, for example Juan Perez, who's the CIO of UPS, they have used our AIML and analytics to do better logistics and route planning. And they have been able to save 10 million gallons of fuel every year which amounts to 400 million in cost savings. Those are the kind of business outcome we would like to drive with the power of our platform. >> Powerful stuff, democratize data multicloud data in any cloud who can argue with that. Debanjan Saha, General Manager and Vice President of engineering for data analytics at Google cloud. Thanks so much for joining me today. >> Paul, thank you thank you for inviting me. >> I'm Paul Gillen. This has been a cube conversation. >> Debanjan: Thank you. (soft music)
SUMMARY :
From the cube studios in Palo Alto and Boston, of BigQuery to additional platforms Paul, nice to meet you and So it's clear the data You can keep as much of data as you want, a rush to the cloud triggered and they have to do that, right? One of the problems They are going to use open API of BigQuery that can query know, going to see, you know to that announcement. is to essentially shuttle their data and the need to make data That is the way you is coming out the data analytics market of products that we have and are you really in a And you know, What's your most important and analytics to do better of engineering for data Paul, thank you thank This has been a cube conversation. (soft music)
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Paul Gillen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Debanjan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Juan Perez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
October 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
HSBC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
UPS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
BigQuery | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Home Depot | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
400 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
two ways | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Debanjan Saha | PERSON | 0.99+ |
more than 80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nevada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Python | TITLE | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SQL | TITLE | 0.99+ |
BigQuery Omni | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Looker | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Redshift | TITLE | 0.98+ |
BigQuery Omni | TITLE | 0.98+ |
one database | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 million gallons | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one set | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
COVID-19 pandemic | EVENT | 0.96+ |
10 X | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
GCP | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Anthos | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
This summer | DATE | 0.92+ |
this summer | DATE | 0.92+ |
tens of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
last seven months | DATE | 0.89+ |
COVID-19 | OTHER | 0.88+ |
CPU | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
two X. | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
one size | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Spark | TITLE | 0.82+ |
Google cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Tamara McCleary, Thulium | Citrix Workspace Summit
>> Announcer: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE Conversation. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE coming to you from our Palo Alto studios for a CUBE Conversation. We're talking about the Citrix Workspace Summit. It happened earlier today. And we've got one of the experts in the field, CUBE alumni and always a really fun guest to have on. Let's give a welcome to Tamara McCleary. She's coming to us from Colorado. She's the CEO of Thulium but you know her from social media and seeing her at all the conferences and speaking. And Tamara, it's great to see you again >> Jeff, it's so good to be here. Hey, next best thing to being in person, right? >> Absolutely. I mean, there is some good stuff. Neither of us had to get on an airplane today and we were able just to connect via the magic of the internet, which I think people forget how magic it truly is. So I looked up, we last spoke, it was mid-April. We were about a month into this thing after the kind of shutdown. And really the topic there was about this light switch moment on the work from home front. Now we're seven months into this, eight months into this, and clearly it's not going away anytime soon. And even when it does, it's not going to go back exactly to the way it was. So first off, how are you doing? 'Cause I know you spend a lot of time at conferences and traveling all over the world, so your life's been changed quite a bit. And then two, just your kind of perspective as we've moved from the light switch moment to the, that this is the new normal and will be the new normal going forward. Maybe not exactly how it is today, but we're not going back to the way that it was before. >> You couldn't be more spot on, Jeff. In fact, when you said April, to me, it almost feels like not seven months. It feels much longer ago. And since the last time I got on an airplane was the end of February, and that was a huge disruption to me in my life. I had always been in three, four cities a week, every week, and haven't traveled on an airplane since February. So the world is different, and it has shifted, and there's no going back. We can't step in the river twice and hit that same spot. I totally messed up that quote, but that's me. You're used to that already. >> Jeff: Exactly. >> But some things don't change. But I think when we look at work, and what we were talking about back in April is that now we're looking at the potential for kind of a hybrid approach, whether we're talking about work or even kids, some kids going back to school, there's a hybrid approach. And with that comes its own set of complexities that we have to consider. So not only has the culture shifted into a place where you have your workforce who has gotten used to working remotely, and there's a lot of things with working remotely that we didn't have when office was the centrical focus for the workplace. So there's a lot of flexibility when you work from home. And I think one of the interesting things with the Citrix Workspace Summit was when CEO David Henshall talked about how it's the people, right? So it's our workforce, our employees who are our most valuable, but also our most costly assets. So we have to make sure that the employee experience is one that is pleasing and helps us to have not only talent acquisition, but also talent retention in a really dynamic, competitive atmosphere. And I'm sure I just posed this question so we could go a million different places with this. Where do you want to go with it, Jeff? >> Well, I was going to say, and of course we can go forever, and we don't have forever, so at some point we'll have to stop talking at the end of this interview. But I just love having you on. And what I want to drill in is as we've talked about the new way to work for a very, very long time. This is not a new topic. And we've had remote work tools and we've had VPNs and we've had mobile phones now since 2007, but we didn't have this forcing function, and I think that's what's really different here is that now it wasn't a choice anymore. There was no more planning and talking about it and maybe or maybe not. Work from home was kind of a first-class citizen in terms of priority. COVID changed all that dramatically overnight. And it's driven home this other kind of concept which we talk a lot about generically in terms of the customer experience as they interact with our applications, which is the way that now they actually interact with the company. And we've talked a little bit about new way to work, but now it's really driven to the forefront, because as you said, there's a lot of benefits from working from home. You could eat dinner with your family, maybe can pick up a few more of the kids' activities, whether it's a sports game in the middle of the afternoon or something in the evening, but there's also a lot of stress. There's a lot of kind of this always on and this constant notifications, whether it's coming from email or text or Slack or Teams or Asana or whatever. So refocusing on the employee experience and elevating that up into a much more important thing, as you said, for both wellness and employee satisfaction, but also retention and getting new employees. It's really changed the priority of that whole set of, kind of point of view around the employee experience that wasn't there kind of pre-COVID. >> Absolutely. And I think you just tapped onto something that I think affects all of us who are juggling these multifaceted lives, and that is the constant interruption and distraction, and that costs money. And I think about that as the CEO of our organization is that how many of these distractions could be avoided to create efficiency and productivity. It also creates happiness for the individual. I don't think anybody likes to be constantly distracted, but when you have a bunch of different applications and you don't have them in one accessible place and you're constantly having to flip between these applications, it can cause a lot of friction and frustration. And I think genuinely that was my very first introduction to Citrix was the ability to really streamline and have everything in one place on a beautiful dashboard that was personalized to the individual. Not everybody in the organization needs to have all the applications, right? Some of your employees only need a few, and it just depends on who they are and what they're doing within the organization. And so I think decreasing that friction, making it easier for people, and certainly ensuring not only a frictionless experience at home but also ensuring security is huge. I mean, how many times have we talked about cybersecurity is not a bolt on afterwards. It has to be all the way up through the stack. And certainly we did have an increased threat landscape with work from home situations because there were all these security breaches and issues and vulnerabilities. So I know we're not talking security today, but I'm wild about it. But I think that all of these things, what I like about what Citrix is doing, and I enjoy the Summit, is the fact that they're blending everything into a single solution so that it just gets done. Work gets done from wherever you are, whether you're at home, you're in office, or in your car, work gets done. >> And not only work but I thought the theme that's interesting that came out in David's keynote is our best work. It's good work and high-value work. And there's really kind of two aspects of that. One, as you just said, is please help me with the distractions and use machine learning and artificial intelligence and this unified platform to decide whether I should or should not be distracted. Also help me prioritize what I should be working on kind of right now, which, again, a great opportunity for AI and ML to elevate that which is most important to the top of my inbox. But even more in one of the keynotes was integrating the concept of wellness, and not just wellness in the HR manual at the back after vision and dental and getting your health checks, but wellness even where the application suggests that you take a two-hour window in this particular period of time to be thoughtful and do some deep thinking. And someone mentioned the people we talk about in automation and getting rid of drudgery and errors and all the bad stuff that comes from doing crappy work, not only is it not fun, but super error prone. This is a really different to use technology to help the employee, as you said, not only just get work done, but get good work done, get high-value work done, prioritize good stuff, and not just deal with the incessant henpecking that is the notification world that it's really easy to fall into if you don't turn some of that stuff off or at least tone them down a little bit. >> That's so true. I don't know if you saw this, but there a study by Stanford of, I think it was 16,000 workers, and over a nine-month period, they did this study, and it was a study looking at work from home and whether productivity was increased. And every, 'cause at first you remember what it was, Jeff. I mean, in the old regime, we would thought, oh dear, we don't want a remote workforce because everybody's going to be hanging out in their pajamas and screwing around and not doing work. And that's not true. What ends up happening is that this study showed that productivity increased by 13%. And, I mean, that's huge, right? So there was a huge bump in performance. And in this particular study, the variables that they cited was perhaps that they had a quieter workspace. I mean, you're not getting barraged by all the endless meetings, unless you have endless Zoom meetings, but that's a whole nother conversation. But you're having more time to focus and flexibility on when you work, which also increases focus. But I thought what you mentioned, the wellness piece was important, because then if you look at other studies, there was a Forbes article that cited that the average worker starts at 8:32 a.m. or something like that and works until 5:38 p.m. And I think the days of the week that were the most productive were Tuesday, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. But this was interesting, I thought. Telephone calls were up by 230%, so the calls that employees were making, and CRM activity was up by 176% and email up by 57% and chats up by 9%. So what we're seeing is that people are trying to find creative ways to remain connected and communicate, but in different ways. And I think that's where the wellness piece comes in and kind of what you were saying with that. I think it's a microapp that Citrix has on their Workspace, their workspace dashboard that pops up a reminder and says, hey, you think you should take a break or get up from your desk. But I think that what's nice about that is it's easy to get sucked into your computer all day. I'm guilty. I will definitely say I can start off pretty darn early in the morning or usually around by five and go till late at night. But, and it's all in front of the computer screen. So maybe I need that Citrix workspace solution to tap me on the shoulder and tell me to go take a meditation break. >> At least one of those watches that'll tell you to get up and twist around. Well, let's shift gears a little bit. They had Satya Nadella on, and Satya is a phenomenal executive, been super successful turning that big, very large boat, Microsoft, into really a cloud company and a SaaS company, and nothing but great success. Always happy to hear him. He had some interesting comments I want to run by you. One of them he said is we were dogmatic about work before, but don't replace what we were with just a new dogma. And what he really highlighted, A, obviously without the technology platform and cloud and all these tools that we have in place, this couldn't have happened. But more importantly, he said it really highlights the need for flexibility and resiliency, and to really, again, kind of elevate those as the first class citizens as to what you should be optimizing for. And really the highlight within this sudden shift with COVID that if you've got those capabilities, you're going to be successful, and if you don't, you're in real trouble >> I'm glad you brought Satya up, because he also said something really cool that I think is true, and that is we are running right now, currently we are running a global scale experiment. Do you remember him saying that? >> Yeah. >> And it's so true. I think right now the social scientists are going wild because finally they've got their captive collection of their study, their guinea pigs. But the other thing he was saying, too, is that we're going to be harnessing all these technologies to be able to re-skill and up-skill. And how long have we been talking about this, Jeff, with the future of work, that it will be a re-skilling and up-skilling of the workforce. He even mentioned holographic technology. He didn't go into it, but just the mention of it got me thinking about how we are currently using some of those nascent technologies to be able to up-skill and re-skill our workforces and also protect a workforce that doesn't necessarily need to be on scene on the edge of it all. And then he gave an example of an engineer being able to communicate with a first-line worker without having to be actually in the physical presence. And so I think this crucible that we're in called a global pandemic, forcing our hand, really, to do all the things that we've been talking about at all these conferences that we've been to, for me, maybe the past two decades, is that it's show, don't tell. So we're not talking about it anymore. We actually have to do it. And another thing that Satya said was that nine to five is definitely not true anymore with work. It's flexibility. And it's really... He also mentioned this EEG study into meeting fatigue. >> Jeff: Yes. >> I thought it was pretty wild. An EEG study into meeting fatigue. And I bet even without reading that study, all of us who are on video conferencing systems can probably tell what the outcome of that was. But concentration wanes very quickly. In fact, I think in that study it was after 20 minutes. But, so kudos to Citrix for putting on their summits, because did you notice for once we had the enjoyment of all these just really contents, deliciously packed segments that were short. >> Jeff: Right. >> Whereas at live events, they went on way too long. I mean, even customer stories went on way too long. And I really love the staccato nature of these customer stories and partnerships and what was working, and I just thought that they did a really nice job, and it was interesting because it met perfectly with staying underneath that 20-minute window before attention wanes. >> Right, right. And they even broke it up into three conferences, right? It was Citrix Synergy before. >> Right. >> Now it's workspaces, it's cloud, and then the third one will be security. But I want to double down on another concept. We talked about it last time with you and with Amy about measuring work and about kind of old work paradigms in terms of measuring performance that were really based more on activity than output. And this concept that work is an output, not a place. And it kind of makes you think of talking about cloud and a cloud-centric way of thinking about things. It's not necessarily the delivery method. It's about adopting quick change and rapid pace and having everything available that you need anywhere you are at the same time. So it seems strange to me that it took this to drive people to figure out that they should be measuring output and not activity. And were some early applications that came out when this all went down that are going to report back as to how often are you looking at your Zoom calls and how often are you sitting in front of your desk and all this silly stuff that just, again, misses the point. And I think this whole employee experience is, as you said, make 'em happy, make 'em feel fulfilled. They want to do meaningful work. They want to do high-value work. They just don't want to be an integration machine between the email system and the accounts receivable system and the accounts payable system. There's so much of an opportunity to get more value from the people, which, oh, by the way, makes for happier people. So do you think finally we're at a point where we can start getting away from just measuring activity unless that's your job to put a widget on a screw and really focus on output and high-value output and innovative output and deep thinking output versus just checking another box and passing the paper down the line? >> You know, Jeff, that reminds me of what Erica Volini, I think she's global human capital practice at Deloitte. I really loved her presentation. I also like the fact that I felt like she was speaking from her home, and she mentioned she's a new mom, and so there was this warmth and connection there which also I think is something really that we don't think about being, but it is a gift since we've all had to work from home is being able to see kind of executive individuals in a regular environment, and it humanizes it all, right? She said something really interesting in her talk. She was talking about rearchitecting the future of work, and she was talking about essentially, the premise was that human beings need, crave, have to have work that's meaningful and real. And part of this whole experience piece, part of this removing the friction from the experience of the employee and providing opportunities, stimulating growth opportunities for employees to give them that sense of meaning. But also she talked about the relationships. I mean, work is a huge part of the relationships in our life. And so this meaningful relationships and connections and in her architecting the work of the future, it's harnessing technology in service to humans to do a better job. And I think the word she used was augmentation, right? So the augmentation piece would be as we think about reinventing or re-imagining or re-architecting, we look at what's going to happen when we have the human working with the machine, but the machine in service to augmenting that human being to do, potential is what she was talking about, to really reach their potential. And so it's not about being replaced by technology. It's not being replaced by artificial intelligence, with machine learning algorithms. It's actually working in tandem so that technology potentiates the human that is using the technology. And I think that was a really good way of putting it. >> Right, right. I mean, we talk, it's one of our taglines, right? To separate the signal from the noise. And the problem is with so many systems now, and I forget, you may know off the top of your head, the average number of applications that people have to interact with every day to get their job done. >> Too many. >> Too many. >> Too many. >> It's a lot. So, so there is a lot of noise, but there's also some signal. And so if you're not paying attention, you can miss the signal that might be super, super important because you're overwhelmed by the noise. And so I think it is a real interesting challenge. It's a technology challenge to apply the machine learning and artificial intelligence, to sort through the total flow, to be able to prioritize and separate the signal from the noise to make sure we're working on the stuff that we should be working on. And I think it's a growing challenge as we just seem to always be adding new applications and adding new notifications and adding new systems that we have to interact with versus taking them away. So Citrix has this approach where we're just going to bring it all in together under one place. And so whether it's your Salesforce notification or your Slack notification or Zoom meeting, whatever, to have it orchestrated as a single place so I don't have 18 tabs, 14 browsers, and two laptops running just to get my day job done. >> You're going to make me self-conscious of all the tabs I have right now. Thanks a lot, Jeff. But, it's kind of, I like hearing stories, right? I think stories communicate to me kind of these practical applications. And I think Citrix did a brilliant job in the Workspace Summit of highlighting some of these customer stories that were really inspiring during the pandemic. One of 'em was City National Bank and Ariel Carrion? This is a test of my memory. He's the CTO, right, of City National Bank. And he's talking about that they had already had a partial migration to the cloud prior to the pandemic. So obviously there was an advantage for those organizations that already had their toe in the water. So, but when the pandemic hit, then it really catalyzed that movement all the way into the cloud and essentially creating a digital bank. And what was really interesting to me is that they funded 9600 loans and taking on new clients during that time of transformation to a digital bank. And one of the coolest things that he said to me was that in a regular program, it would've taken, mind you, get this. It would've taken 14 years, 14 years to accomplish what they did in three months. >> That's a long time. >> I was blown away, right? Just to me, that speaks a lot, because what we're talking about here is their clients are small business, and who do you think was impacted most during the pandemic? Small business. So the ability to get loans was critically important to the survival of a lot of companies. And the same story they had with eBay and David Lessor was talking, he's a senior manager in the office of the CIO, I think I remember. And he was talking about how obviously eBay is a digital platform, right? But if you think about the pandemic when we were all had these shelter in place orders, lots of people were able to still make money and earn a living because they were able to do business on eBay. And both eBay and City National Bank are obviously customers of Citrix. But I just found this to be really inspiring, because for eBay pre-pandemic, it was like, I don't know. I think they said they had 11,000 connected users prior to the pandemic, and a lot of those were in physical call centers. >> Jeff: Right. >> And then post-pandemic, I think he was reaching, saying end of Q4 was going to be something like 14,000 connected users. That's huge from 11 to 14. >> Yeah. >> And again, to your point, it's kind of forcing our hand into really not only pivoting, but increasing our speed in this ever-changing dynamic environment. >> Right. >> You know, one of the other things that came up, before I let you go, that it's always nice to have frameworks. Sometimes it just helps us organize our thoughts and it's kind of a mental cheat sheet. And they talked about the four Cs, connectivity, content, collaboration, and culture. And I would have to say they're in inverse order of how I would potentially have prioritized them. But I just wanted to zero in on the culture piece, 'cause I don't think people focus enough on culture. And one of the things I think we talked about in April, and I've certainly talked about a number of times going through this thing in leadership in these crazy times is that the frequency and the type and the topics in communication within your internal world have gone up dramatically. I think we had the, we had a CMO on the other day, and she said internal comms, this is a big company, prior to COVID was important, but not that important within the list of the CMO's activity. But then once this thing hit, right, suddenly internal communications, again, in terms of frequency and the types of topics you're talking about and the forums that you talk about and the actual vehicles in which you talk about, whether it's a all hands Zoom call or it's more frequent one-on-ones with your manager, really, really increase the importance of culture, and then I think probably is going to show over time the people that have it right, getting some separation distance from the people that got it wrong. I wonder if you could just talk about, 'cause you're a big culture person and you know how important the people part of the whole thing is. >> Yeah, culture drives everything. You're right. And that was Citrix's CIO who gave those four Cs, I think, Meerah Rajavel. >> Yeah, yeah. >> She gave those four Cs. And you couldn't be, you couldn't have tapped into something that I think is the soft underbelly of the organization, which is what is the culture. And anyone who's worked in an organization with a sick culture knows that it's just, it's cancerous, right? It grows and it causes decay. And I don't care how much innovation you have. If the culture is sick, you just, you're going to lose your best people. It's hard to work in a sick culture. And so I think what we had to do is when we all started working remotely, that was a culture shift, because we were siloed off of it. We weren't actually hanging out in physical space. Some of the things that we enjoyed about meeting with other human beings physically changed. And so it really behooved organizations to take a look at how they were going to foster culture digitally, how they were going to create that sense of bonding between not only those within your departmental area, but cross over into other areas. And I think that creating that culture that says I don't have to be in the exact same physical space, but we can still connect. I mean, you and I are doing this. We're not in the same physical space. >> Jeff: Right. >> But I'm still going to feel like we met today. >> Jeff: Right. >> You can create that for your employees. And it also means that we learned that we don't have to be in that same physical space, right? And I thought that was a really interesting position when Hayden Brown, the CEO of Upwork, was talking at the summit and saying that even when we look at creating culture with employees who aren't necessarily, maybe it's a workforce from all over the world that you're using, a remote workforce. And when you're using things like employees, if you've got work to do and you can find a really good talent and you can grab them for what it is that you need, you're actually increasing your ability to be able to deliver on things versus having to worry about whether you have that person in house, but you still can create that culture where everyone is inclusive, where someone can be in Australia and someone's in San Francisco and someone's in the UK, and you still have to create a cohesive, inclusive culture. And it matters not anymore whether or not you are a full-time employee or if you're a contract worker. I think in today's space, and certainly in those future of work conversations, it's more about, to the very first thing you said at the beginning, it's more about output. How's that for tying it back up again? >> Jeff: Yeah, very good. >> And that was totally unplanned. But it is about output, and that's going to be the future of work culture. It's not going to be the title that you have, whether or not you're a full-time employee or a part-time employee or a contract worker. It's going to be who are you meeting with? Who are you having these digital interfaces with and Slacking with or using any sort of platform application that you want to use. It's remaining in touch and in communication, and no longer is it about a physical space. It's a digital space. >> Right, right. All right, well, I'm going to give you the last word. You are a super positive person, and there's reasons, and for people that haven't watched your TED Talk, they should. I think it's super impactful and it really changed the way I look at you. So of all the negatives, wrap us up with some positives that you see as we come out of COVID that going through this experience will make in our lives, both our work lives as well as our personal lives. >> Well, since you're going to allow me to go deep here, I would say one of the things that COVID has brought us is pause. It caused us to go in. And with any dark night of the soul, we have to wrestle with the things that are real for us, and the things that fall away are those that were false, false perceptions, false ideas, illusions of even thinking who we are, what we're doing. And we had to come home to ourselves. And I think one of the things that COVID gave us through uncertainty was finding a center in that uncertainty. And maybe we got to know our beloveds a bit more. Maybe we got to know our kids a bit more, even if they drive us crazy sometimes. But in the end, I think maybe we all got to know ourselves a little bit more. And for that, I think we can harness those seeds of wisdom and make better choices in the future to co-create together a future that we are all pleased to wake up in, one that is fair, one that is equal, one that is inclusive, and one that we can be proud to have contributed to. And that's what I hope we've taken from this extremely hard time. >> Well, Tamara, thanks for sharing your wisdom with us. Really appreciate it. And great to see ya. >> Good to see you, too, thank you. >> All right, she's Tamara, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (bright music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world, And Tamara, it's great to see you again Jeff, it's so good to be here. And really the topic there was about and that was a huge that the employee experience and of course we can go forever, and that is the constant and all the bad stuff that and kind of what you and to really, again, and that is we are running right now, And so I think this crucible that we're in And I bet even without reading that study, And I really love the staccato nature And they even broke it up and passing the paper down the line? And I think that was a really And the problem is with and separate the signal from the noise that he said to me was that And the same story they had with eBay I think he was reaching, And again, to your point, and the forums that you talk about And that was Citrix's CIO Some of the things that we enjoyed about But I'm still going to and someone's in the UK, and that's going to be the and for people that haven't watched and one that we can be proud And great to see ya. We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Erica Volini | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Meerah Rajavel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Lessor | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tamara | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Colorado | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
City National Bank | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tamara McCleary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
14 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
April | DATE | 0.99+ |
two-hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
David Henshall | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eBay | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
14 browsers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
9600 loans | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Satya | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Citrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
18 tabs | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hayden Brown | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Deloitte | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20-minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Stanford | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
8:32 a.m. | DATE | 0.99+ |
13% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
February | DATE | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
TED Talk | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
16,000 workers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thulium | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
9% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
57% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thulium | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
230% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Wednesdays | DATE | 0.99+ |
Satya Nadella | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thursdays | DATE | 0.99+ |
two laptops | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
four cities | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
mid-April | DATE | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
176% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Upwork | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Citrix Workspace Summit | EVENT | 0.98+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two aspects | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
14,000 connected users | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Armstrong and Guhamad and Jacques V2
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube covering >>space and cybersecurity. Symposium 2020 hosted by Cal Poly >>Over On Welcome to this Special virtual conference. The Space and Cybersecurity Symposium 2020 put on by Cal Poly with support from the Cube. I'm John for your host and master of ceremonies. Got a great topic today in this session. Really? The intersection of space and cybersecurity. This topic and this conversation is the cybersecurity workforce development through public and private partnerships. And we've got a great lineup. We have Jeff Armstrong's the president of California Polytechnic State University, also known as Cal Poly Jeffrey. Thanks for jumping on and Bang. Go ahead. The second director of C four s R Division. And he's joining us from the office of the Under Secretary of Defense for the acquisition Sustainment Department of Defense, D O D. And, of course, Steve Jake's executive director, founder, National Security Space Association and managing partner at Bello's. Gentlemen, thank you for joining me for this session. We got an hour conversation. Thanks for coming on. >>Thank you. >>So we got a virtual event here. We've got an hour, have a great conversation and love for you guys do? In opening statement on how you see the development through public and private partnerships around cybersecurity in space, Jeff will start with you. >>Well, thanks very much, John. It's great to be on with all of you. Uh, on behalf Cal Poly Welcome, everyone. Educating the workforce of tomorrow is our mission to Cal Poly. Whether that means traditional undergraduates, master students are increasingly mid career professionals looking toe up, skill or re skill. Our signature pedagogy is learn by doing, which means that our graduates arrive at employers ready Day one with practical skills and experience. We have long thought of ourselves is lucky to be on California's beautiful central Coast. But in recent years, as we have developed closer relationships with Vandenberg Air Force Base, hopefully the future permanent headquarters of the United States Space Command with Vandenberg and other regional partners, we have discovered that our location is even more advantages than we thought. We're just 50 miles away from Vandenberg, a little closer than u C. Santa Barbara, and the base represents the southern border of what we have come to think of as the central coast region. Cal Poly and Vandenberg Air force base have partner to support regional economic development to encourage the development of a commercial spaceport toe advocate for the space Command headquarters coming to Vandenberg and other ventures. These partnerships have been possible because because both parties stand to benefit Vandenberg by securing new streams of revenue, workforce and local supply chain and Cal Poly by helping to grow local jobs for graduates, internship opportunities for students, and research and entrepreneurship opportunities for faculty and staff. Crucially, what's good for Vandenberg Air Force Base and for Cal Poly is also good for the Central Coast and the US, creating new head of household jobs, infrastructure and opportunity. Our goal is that these new jobs bring more diversity and sustainability for the region. This regional economic development has taken on a life of its own, spawning a new nonprofit called Reach, which coordinates development efforts from Vandenberg Air Force Base in the South to camp to Camp Roberts in the North. Another factor that is facilitated our relationship with Vandenberg Air Force Base is that we have some of the same friends. For example, Northrop Grumman has has long been an important defense contractor, an important partner to Cal poly funding scholarships and facilities that have allowed us to stay current with technology in it to attract highly qualified students for whom Cal Poly's costs would otherwise be prohibitive. For almost 20 years north of grimness funded scholarships for Cal Poly students this year, their funding 64 scholarships, some directly in our College of Engineering and most through our Cal Poly Scholars program, Cal Poly Scholars, a support both incoming freshman is transfer students. These air especially important because it allows us to provide additional support and opportunities to a group of students who are mostly first generation, low income and underrepresented and who otherwise might not choose to attend Cal Poly. They also allow us to recruit from partner high schools with large populations of underrepresented minority students, including the Fortune High School in Elk Grove, which we developed a deep and lasting connection. We know that the best work is done by balanced teams that include multiple and diverse perspectives. These scholarships help us achieve that goal, and I'm sure you know Northrop Grumman was recently awarded a very large contract to modernized the U. S. I. C B M Armory with some of the work being done at Vandenberg Air Force Base, thus supporting the local economy and protecting protecting our efforts in space requires partnerships in the digital realm. How Polly is partnered with many private companies, such as AWS. Our partnerships with Amazon Web services has enabled us to train our students with next generation cloud engineering skills, in part through our jointly created digital transformation hub. Another partnership example is among Cal Poly's California Cybersecurity Institute, College of Engineering and the California National Guard. This partnership is focused on preparing a cyber ready workforce by providing faculty and students with a hands on research and learning environment, side by side with military, law enforcement professionals and cyber experts. We also have a long standing partnership with PG and E, most recently focused on workforce development and redevelopment. Many of our graduates do indeed go on to careers in aerospace and defense industry as a rough approximation. More than 4500 Cal Poly graduates list aerospace and defense as their employment sector on linked in, and it's not just our engineers and computer sciences. When I was speaking to our fellow Panelists not too long ago, >>are >>speaking to bang, we learned that Rachel sins, one of our liberal arts arts majors, is working in his office. So shout out to you, Rachel. And then finally, of course, some of our graduates sword extraordinary heights such as Commander Victor Glover, who will be heading to the International space station later this year as I close. All of which is to say that we're deeply committed the workforce, development and redevelopment that we understand the value of public private partnerships and that were eager to find new ways in which to benefit everyone from this further cooperation. So we're committed to the region, the state in the nation and our past efforts in space, cybersecurity and links to our partners at as I indicated, aerospace industry and governmental partners provides a unique position for us to move forward in the interface of space and cybersecurity. Thank you so much, John. >>President, I'm sure thank you very much for the comments and congratulations to Cal Poly for being on the forefront of innovation and really taking a unique progressive. You and wanna tip your hat to you guys over there. Thank you very much for those comments. Appreciate it. Bahng. Department of Defense. Exciting you gotta defend the nation spaces Global. Your opening statement. >>Yes, sir. Thanks, John. Appreciate that day. Thank you, everybody. I'm honored to be this panel along with President Armstrong, Cal Poly in my long longtime friend and colleague Steve Jakes of the National Security Space Association, to discuss a very important topic of cybersecurity workforce development, as President Armstrong alluded to, I'll tell you both of these organizations, Cal Poly and the N S. A have done and continue to do an exceptional job at finding talent, recruiting them in training current and future leaders and technical professionals that we vitally need for our nation's growing space programs. A swell Asare collective National security Earlier today, during Session three high, along with my colleague Chris Hansen discussed space, cyber Security and how the space domain is changing the landscape of future conflicts. I discussed the rapid emergence of commercial space with the proliferations of hundreds, if not thousands, of satellites providing a variety of services, including communications allowing for global Internet connectivity. S one example within the O. D. We continue to look at how we can leverage this opportunity. I'll tell you one of the enabling technologies eyes the use of small satellites, which are inherently cheaper and perhaps more flexible than the traditional bigger systems that we have historically used unemployed for the U. D. Certainly not lost on Me is the fact that Cal Poly Pioneer Cube SATs 2020 some years ago, and they set the standard for the use of these systems today. So they saw the valiant benefit gained way ahead of everybody else, it seems, and Cal Poly's focus on training and education is commendable. I especially impressed by the efforts of another of Steve's I colleague, current CEO Mr Bill Britain, with his high energy push to attract the next generation of innovators. Uh, earlier this year, I had planned on participating in this year's Cyber Innovation Challenge. In June works Cal Poly host California Mill and high school students and challenge them with situations to test their cyber knowledge. I tell you, I wish I had that kind of opportunity when I was a kid. Unfortunately, the pandemic change the plan. Why I truly look forward. Thio feature events such as these Thio participating. Now I want to recognize my good friend Steve Jakes, whom I've known for perhaps too long of a time here over two decades or so, who was in acknowledge space expert and personally, I truly applaud him for having the foresight of years back to form the National Security Space Association to help the entire space enterprise navigate through not only technology but Polly policy issues and challenges and paved the way for operational izing space. Space is our newest horrifying domain. That's not a secret anymore. Uh, and while it is a unique area, it shares a lot of common traits with the other domains such as land, air and sea, obviously all of strategically important to the defense of the United States. In conflict they will need to be. They will all be contested and therefore they all need to be defended. One domain alone will not win future conflicts in a joint operation. We must succeed. All to defending space is critical as critical is defending our other operational domains. Funny space is no longer the sanctuary available only to the government. Increasingly, as I discussed in the previous session, commercial space is taking the lead a lot of different areas, including R and D, A so called new space, so cyber security threat is even more demanding and even more challenging. Three US considers and federal access to and freedom to operate in space vital to advancing security, economic prosperity, prosperity and scientific knowledge of the country. That's making cyberspace an inseparable component. America's financial, social government and political life. We stood up US Space force ah, year ago or so as the newest military service is like the other services. Its mission is to organize, train and equip space forces in order to protect us and allied interest in space and to provide space capabilities to the joint force. Imagine combining that US space force with the U. S. Cyber Command to unify the direction of space and cyberspace operation strengthened U D capabilities and integrate and bolster d o d cyber experience. Now, of course, to enable all of this requires had trained and professional cadre of cyber security experts, combining a good mix of policy as well as high technical skill set much like we're seeing in stem, we need to attract more people to this growing field. Now the D. O. D. Is recognized the importance of the cybersecurity workforce, and we have implemented policies to encourage his growth Back in 2013 the deputy secretary of defense signed the D. O d cyberspace workforce strategy to create a comprehensive, well equipped cyber security team to respond to national security concerns. Now this strategy also created a program that encourages collaboration between the D. O. D and private sector employees. We call this the Cyber Information Technology Exchange program or site up. It's an exchange programs, which is very interesting, in which a private sector employees can naturally work for the D. O. D. In a cyber security position that spans across multiple mission critical areas are important to the d. O. D. A key responsibility of cybersecurity community is military leaders on the related threats and cyber security actions we need to have to defeat these threats. We talk about rapid that position, agile business processes and practices to speed up innovation. Likewise, cybersecurity must keep up with this challenge to cyber security. Needs to be right there with the challenges and changes, and this requires exceptional personnel. We need to attract talent investing the people now to grow a robust cybersecurity, workforce, streets, future. I look forward to the panel discussion, John. Thank you. >>Thank you so much bomb for those comments and you know, new challenges and new opportunities and new possibilities and free freedom Operating space. Critical. Thank you for those comments. Looking forward. Toa chatting further. Steve Jakes, executive director of N. S. S. A Europe opening statement. >>Thank you, John. And echoing bangs thanks to Cal Poly for pulling these this important event together and frankly, for allowing the National Security Space Association be a part of it. Likewise, we on behalf the association delighted and honored Thio be on this panel with President Armstrong along with my friend and colleague Bonneau Glue Mahad Something for you all to know about Bomb. He spent the 1st 20 years of his career in the Air Force doing space programs. He then went into industry for several years and then came back into government to serve. Very few people do that. So bang on behalf of the space community, we thank you for your long life long devotion to service to our nation. We really appreciate that and I also echo a bang shot out to that guy Bill Britain, who has been a long time co conspirator of ours for a long time and you're doing great work there in the cyber program at Cal Poly Bill, keep it up. But professor arms trying to keep a close eye on him. Uh, I would like to offer a little extra context to the great comments made by by President Armstrong and bahng. Uh, in our view, the timing of this conference really could not be any better. Um, we all recently reflected again on that tragic 9 11 surprise attack on our homeland. And it's an appropriate time, we think, to take pause while the percentage of you in the audience here weren't even born or babies then For the most of us, it still feels like yesterday. And moreover, a tragedy like 9 11 has taught us a lot to include to be more vigilant, always keep our collective eyes and ears open to include those quote eyes and ears from space, making sure nothing like this ever happens again. So this conference is a key aspect. Protecting our nation requires we work in a cybersecurity environment at all times. But, you know, the fascinating thing about space systems is we can't see him. No, sir, We see Space launches man there's nothing more invigorating than that. But after launch, they become invisible. So what are they really doing up there? What are they doing to enable our quality of life in the United States and in the world? Well, to illustrate, I'd like to paraphrase elements of an article in Forbes magazine by Bonds and my good friend Chuck Beans. Chuck. It's a space guy, actually had Bonds job a fuse in the Pentagon. He is now chairman and chief strategy officer at York Space Systems, and in his spare time he's chairman of the small satellites. Chuck speaks in words that everyone can understand. So I'd like to give you some of his words out of his article. Uh, they're afraid somewhat. So these are Chuck's words. Let's talk about average Joe and playing Jane. Before heading to the airport for a business trip to New York City, Joe checks the weather forecast informed by Noah's weather satellites to see what pack for the trip. He then calls an uber that space app. Everybody uses it matches riders with drivers via GPS to take into the airport, So Joe has lunch of the airport. Unbeknownst to him, his organic lunch is made with the help of precision farming made possible through optimized irrigation and fertilization, with remote spectral sensing coming from space and GPS on the plane, the pilot navigates around weather, aided by GPS and nose weather satellites. And Joe makes his meeting on time to join his New York colleagues in a video call with a key customer in Singapore made possible by telecommunication satellites. Around to his next meeting, Joe receives notice changing the location of the meeting to another to the other side of town. So he calmly tells Syria to adjust the destination, and his satellite guided Google maps redirects him to the new location. That evening, Joe watches the news broadcast via satellite. The report details a meeting among world leaders discussing the developing crisis in Syria. As it turns out, various forms of quote remotely sensed. Information collected from satellites indicate that yet another band, chemical weapon, may have been used on its own people. Before going to bed, Joe decides to call his parents and congratulate them for their wedding anniversary as they cruise across the Atlantic, made possible again by communications satellites and Joe's parents can enjoy the call without even wondering how it happened the next morning. Back home, Joe's wife, Jane, is involved in a car accident. Her vehicle skids off the road. She's knocked unconscious, but because of her satellite equipped on star system, the crash is detected immediately and first responders show up on the scene. In time, Joe receives the news books. An early trip home sends flowers to his wife as he orders another uber to the airport. Over that 24 hours, Joe and Jane used space system applications for nearly every part of their day. Imagine the consequences if at any point they were somehow denied these services, whether they be by natural causes or a foreign hostility. And each of these satellite applications used in this case were initially developed for military purposes and continue to be, but also have remarkable application on our way of life. Just many people just don't know that. So, ladies and gentlemen, now you know, thanks to chuck beans, well, the United States has a proud heritage being the world's leading space faring nation, dating back to the Eisenhower and Kennedy years. Today we have mature and robust systems operating from space, providing overhead reconnaissance to quote, wash and listen, provide missile warning, communications, positioning, navigation and timing from our GPS system. Much of what you heard in Lieutenant General J. T. Thompson earlier speech. These systems are not only integral to our national security, but also our also to our quality of life is Chuck told us. We simply no longer could live without these systems as a nation and for that matter, as a world. But over the years, adversary like adversaries like China, Russia and other countries have come to realize the value of space systems and are aggressively playing ketchup while also pursuing capabilities that will challenge our systems. As many of you know, in 2000 and seven, China demonstrated it's a set system by actually shooting down is one of its own satellites and has been aggressively developing counter space systems to disrupt hours. So in a heavily congested space environment, our systems are now being contested like never before and will continue to bay well as Bond mentioned, the United States has responded to these changing threats. In addition to adding ways to protect our system, the administration and in Congress recently created the United States Space Force and the operational you United States Space Command, the latter of which you heard President Armstrong and other Californians hope is going to be located. Vandenberg Air Force Base Combined with our intelligence community today, we have focused military and civilian leadership now in space. And that's a very, very good thing. Commence, really. On the industry side, we did create the National Security Space Association devoted solely to supporting the national security Space Enterprise. We're based here in the D C area, but we have arms and legs across the country, and we are loaded with extraordinary talent. In scores of Forman, former government executives, So S s a is joined at the hip with our government customers to serve and to support. We're busy with a multitude of activities underway ranging from a number of thought provoking policy. Papers are recurring space time Webcast supporting Congress's Space Power Caucus and other main serious efforts. Check us out at NSS. A space dot org's One of our strategic priorities in central to today's events is to actively promote and nurture the workforce development. Just like cow calling. We will work with our U. S. Government customers, industry leaders and academia to attract and recruit students to join the space world, whether in government or industry and two assistant mentoring and training as their careers. Progress on that point, we're delighted. Be delighted to be working with Cal Poly as we hopefully will undertake a new pilot program with him very soon. So students stay tuned something I can tell you Space is really cool. While our nation's satellite systems are technical and complex, our nation's government and industry work force is highly diverse, with a combination of engineers, physicists, method and mathematicians, but also with a large non technical expertise as well. Think about how government gets things thes systems designed, manufactured, launching into orbit and operating. They do this via contracts with our aerospace industry, requiring talents across the board from cost estimating cost analysis, budgeting, procurement, legal and many other support. Tasker Integral to the mission. Many thousands of people work in the space workforce tens of billions of dollars every year. This is really cool stuff, no matter what your education background, a great career to be part of. When summary as bang had mentioned Aziz, well, there is a great deal of exciting challenges ahead we will see a new renaissance in space in the years ahead, and in some cases it's already begun. Billionaires like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Sir Richard Richard Branson are in the game, stimulating new ideas in business models, other private investors and start up companies. Space companies are now coming in from all angles. The exponential advancement of technology and microelectronics now allows the potential for a plethora of small SAT systems to possibly replace older satellites the size of a Greyhound bus. It's getting better by the day and central to this conference, cybersecurity is paramount to our nation's critical infrastructure in space. So once again, thanks very much, and I look forward to the further conversation. >>Steve, thank you very much. Space is cool. It's relevant. But it's important, as you pointed out, and you're awesome story about how it impacts our life every day. So I really appreciate that great story. I'm glad you took the time Thio share that you forgot the part about the drone coming over in the crime scene and, you know, mapping it out for you. But that would add that to the story later. Great stuff. My first question is let's get into the conversations because I think this is super important. President Armstrong like you to talk about some of the points that was teased out by Bang and Steve. One in particular is the comment around how military research was important in developing all these capabilities, which is impacting all of our lives. Through that story. It was the military research that has enabled a generation and generation of value for consumers. This is kind of this workforce conversation. There are opportunities now with with research and grants, and this is, ah, funding of innovation that it's highly accelerate. It's happening very quickly. Can you comment on how research and the partnerships to get that funding into the universities is critical? >>Yeah, I really appreciate that And appreciate the comments of my colleagues on it really boils down to me to partnerships, public private partnerships. You mentioned Northrop Grumman, but we have partnerships with Lockie Martin, Boeing, Raytheon Space six JPL, also member of organization called Business Higher Education Forum, which brings together university presidents and CEOs of companies. There's been focused on cybersecurity and data science, and I hope that we can spill into cybersecurity in space but those partnerships in the past have really brought a lot forward at Cal Poly Aziz mentioned we've been involved with Cube set. Uh, we've have some secure work and we want to plan to do more of that in the future. Uh, those partnerships are essential not only for getting the r and d done, but also the students, the faculty, whether masters or undergraduate, can be involved with that work. Uh, they get that real life experience, whether it's on campus or virtually now during Covic or at the location with the partner, whether it may be governmental or our industry. Uh, and then they're even better equipped, uh, to hit the ground running. And of course, we'd love to see even more of our students graduate with clearance so that they could do some of that a secure work as well. So these partnerships are absolutely critical, and it's also in the context of trying to bring the best and the brightest and all demographics of California and the US into this field, uh, to really be successful. So these partnerships are essential, and our goal is to grow them just like I know other colleagues and C. S u and the U C are planning to dio, >>you know, just as my age I've seen I grew up in the eighties, in college and during that systems generation and that the generation before me, they really kind of pioneered the space that spawned the computer revolution. I mean, you look at these key inflection points in our lives. They were really funded through these kinds of real deep research. Bond talk about that because, you know, we're living in an age of cloud. And Bezos was mentioned. Elon Musk. Sir Richard Branson. You got new ideas coming in from the outside. You have an accelerated clock now on terms of the innovation cycles, and so you got to react differently. You guys have programs to go outside >>of >>the Defense Department. How important is this? Because the workforce that air in schools and our folks re skilling are out there and you've been on both sides of the table. So share your thoughts. >>No, thanks, John. Thanks for the opportunity responded. And that's what you hit on the notes back in the eighties, R and D in space especially, was dominated by my government funding. Uh, contracts and so on. But things have changed. As Steve pointed out, A lot of these commercial entities funded by billionaires are coming out of the woodwork funding R and D. So they're taking the lead. So what we can do within the deal, the in government is truly take advantage of the work they've done on. Uh, since they're they're, you know, paving the way to new new approaches and new way of doing things. And I think we can We could certainly learn from that. And leverage off of that saves us money from an R and D standpoint while benefiting from from the product that they deliver, you know, within the O D Talking about workforce development Way have prioritized we have policies now to attract and retain talent. We need I I had the folks do some research and and looks like from a cybersecurity workforce standpoint. A recent study done, I think, last year in 2019 found that the cybersecurity workforce gap in the U. S. Is nearing half a million people, even though it is a growing industry. So the pipeline needs to be strengthened off getting people through, you know, starting young and through college, like assess a professor Armstrong indicated, because we're gonna need them to be in place. Uh, you know, in a period of about maybe a decade or so, Uh, on top of that, of course, is the continuing issue we have with the gap with with stamps students, we can't afford not to have expertise in place to support all the things we're doing within the with the not only deal with the but the commercial side as well. Thank you. >>How's the gap? Get? Get filled. I mean, this is the this is again. You got cybersecurity. I mean, with space. It's a whole another kind of surface area, if you will, in early surface area. But it is. It is an I o t. Device if you think about it. But it does have the same challenges. That's kind of current and and progressive with cybersecurity. Where's the gap Get filled, Steve Or President Armstrong? I mean, how do you solve the problem and address this gap in the workforce? What is some solutions and what approaches do we need to put in place? >>Steve, go ahead. I'll follow up. >>Okay. Thanks. I'll let you correct. May, uh, it's a really good question, and it's the way I would. The way I would approach it is to focus on it holistically and to acknowledge it up front. And it comes with our teaching, etcetera across the board and from from an industry perspective, I mean, we see it. We've gotta have secure systems with everything we do and promoting this and getting students at early ages and mentoring them and throwing internships at them. Eyes is so paramount to the whole the whole cycle, and and that's kind of and it really takes focused attention. And we continue to use the word focus from an NSS, a perspective. We know the challenges that are out there. There are such talented people in the workforce on the government side, but not nearly enough of them. And likewise on industry side. We could use Maura's well, but when you get down to it, you know we can connect dots. You know that the the aspect That's a Professor Armstrong talked about earlier toe where you continue to work partnerships as much as you possibly can. We hope to be a part of that. That network at that ecosystem the will of taking common objectives and working together to kind of make these things happen and to bring the power not just of one or two companies, but our our entire membership to help out >>President >>Trump. Yeah, I would. I would also add it again. It's back to partnerships that I talked about earlier. One of our partners is high schools and schools fortune Margaret Fortune, who worked in a couple of, uh, administrations in California across party lines and education. Their fifth graders all visit Cal Poly and visit our learned by doing lab and you, you've got to get students interested in stem at a early age. We also need the partnerships, the scholarships, the financial aid so the students can graduate with minimal to no debt to really hit the ground running. And that's exacerbated and really stress. Now, with this covert induced recession, California supports higher education at a higher rate than most states in the nation. But that is that has dropped this year or reasons. We all understand, uh, due to Kobe, and so our partnerships, our creativity on making sure that we help those that need the most help financially uh, that's really key, because the gaps air huge eyes. My colleagues indicated, you know, half of half a million jobs and you need to look at the the students that are in the pipeline. We've got to enhance that. Uh, it's the in the placement rates are amazing. Once the students get to a place like Cal Poly or some of our other amazing CSU and UC campuses, uh, placement rates are like 94%. >>Many of our >>engineers, they have jobs lined up a year before they graduate. So it's just gonna take key partnerships working together. Uh, and that continued partnership with government, local, of course, our state of CSU on partners like we have here today, both Stephen Bang So partnerships the thing >>e could add, you know, the collaboration with universities one that we, uh, put a lot of emphasis, and it may not be well known fact, but as an example of national security agencies, uh, National Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber, the Fast works with over 270 colleges and universities across the United States to educate its 45 future cyber first responders as an example, so that Zatz vibrant and healthy and something that we ought Teoh Teik, banjo >>off. Well, I got the brain trust here on this topic. I want to get your thoughts on this one point. I'd like to define what is a public private partnership because the theme that's coming out of the symposium is the script has been flipped. It's a modern error. Things air accelerated get you got security. So you get all these things kind of happen is a modern approach and you're seeing a digital transformation play out all over the world in business. Andi in the public sector. So >>what is what >>is a modern public private partnership? What does it look like today? Because people are learning differently, Covert has pointed out, which was that we're seeing right now. How people the progressions of knowledge and learning truth. It's all changing. How do you guys view the modern version of public private partnership and some some examples and improve points? Can you can you guys share that? We'll start with the Professor Armstrong. >>Yeah. A zai indicated earlier. We've had on guy could give other examples, but Northup Grumman, uh, they helped us with cyber lab. Many years ago. That is maintained, uh, directly the software, the connection outside its its own unit so that students can learn the hack, they can learn to penetrate defenses, and I know that that has already had some considerations of space. But that's a benefit to both parties. So a good public private partnership has benefits to both entities. Uh, in the common factor for universities with a lot of these partnerships is the is the talent, the talent that is, that is needed, what we've been working on for years of the, you know, that undergraduate or master's or PhD programs. But now it's also spilling into Skilling and re Skilling. As you know, Jobs. Uh, you know, folks were in jobs today that didn't exist two years, three years, five years ago. But it also spills into other aspects that can expand even mawr. We're very fortunate. We have land, there's opportunities. We have one tech part project. We're expanding our tech park. I think we'll see opportunities for that, and it'll it'll be adjusted thio, due to the virtual world that we're all learning more and more about it, which we were in before Cove it. But I also think that that person to person is going to be important. Um, I wanna make sure that I'm driving across the bridge. Or or that that satellites being launched by the engineer that's had at least some in person training, uh, to do that and that experience, especially as a first time freshman coming on a campus, getting that experience expanding and as adult. And we're gonna need those public private partnerships in order to continue to fund those at a level that is at the excellence we need for these stem and engineering fields. >>It's interesting People in technology can work together in these partnerships in a new way. Bank Steve Reaction Thio the modern version of what a public, successful private partnership looks like. >>If I could jump in John, I think, you know, historically, Dodi's has have had, ah, high bar thio, uh, to overcome, if you will, in terms of getting rapid pulling in your company. This is the fault, if you will and not rely heavily in are the usual suspects of vendors and like and I think the deal is done a good job over the last couple of years off trying to reduce the burden on working with us. You know, the Air Force. I think they're pioneering this idea around pitch days where companies come in, do a two hour pitch and immediately notified of a wooden award without having to wait a long time. Thio get feedback on on the quality of the product and so on. So I think we're trying to do our best. Thio strengthen that partnership with companies outside the main group of people that we typically use. >>Steve, any reaction? Comment to add? >>Yeah, I would add a couple of these air. Very excellent thoughts. Uh, it zits about taking a little gamble by coming out of your comfort zone. You know, the world that Bond and Bond lives in and I used to live in in the past has been quite structured. It's really about we know what the threat is. We need to go fix it, will design it says we go make it happen, we'll fly it. Um, life is so much more complicated than that. And so it's it's really to me. I mean, you take you take an example of the pitch days of bond talks about I think I think taking a gamble by attempting to just do a lot of pilot programs, uh, work the trust factor between government folks and the industry folks in academia. Because we are all in this together in a lot of ways, for example. I mean, we just sent the paper to the White House of their requests about, you know, what would we do from a workforce development perspective? And we hope Thio embellish on this over time once the the initiative matures. But we have a piece of it, for example, is the thing we call clear for success getting back Thio Uh, President Armstrong's comments at the collegiate level. You know, high, high, high quality folks are in high demand. So why don't we put together a program they grabbed kids in their their underclass years identifies folks that are interested in doing something like this. Get them scholarships. Um, um, I have a job waiting for them that their contract ID for before they graduate, and when they graduate, they walk with S C I clearance. We believe that could be done so, and that's an example of ways in which the public private partnerships can happen to where you now have a talented kid ready to go on Day one. We think those kind of things can happen. It just gets back down to being focused on specific initiatives, give them giving them a chance and run as many pilot programs as you can like these days. >>That's a great point, E. President. >>I just want to jump in and echo both the bank and Steve's comments. But Steve, that you know your point of, you know, our graduates. We consider them ready Day one. Well, they need to be ready Day one and ready to go secure. We totally support that and and love to follow up offline with you on that. That's that's exciting, uh, and needed very much needed mawr of it. Some of it's happening, but way certainly have been thinking a lot about that and making some plans, >>and that's a great example of good Segway. My next question. This kind of reimagining sees work flows, eyes kind of breaking down the old the old way and bringing in kind of a new way accelerated all kind of new things. There are creative ways to address this workforce issue, and this is the next topic. How can we employ new creative solutions? Because, let's face it, you know, it's not the days of get your engineering degree and and go interview for a job and then get slotted in and get the intern. You know the programs you get you particularly through the system. This is this is multiple disciplines. Cybersecurity points at that. You could be smart and math and have, ah, degree in anthropology and even the best cyber talents on the planet. So this is a new new world. What are some creative approaches that >>you know, we're >>in the workforce >>is quite good, John. One of the things I think that za challenge to us is you know, we got somehow we got me working for with the government, sexy, right? The part of the challenge we have is attracting the right right level of skill sets and personnel. But, you know, we're competing oftentimes with the commercial side, the gaming industry as examples of a big deal. And those are the same talents. We need to support a lot of programs we have in the U. D. So somehow we have to do a better job to Steve's point off, making the work within the U. D within the government something that they would be interested early on. So I tracked him early. I kind of talked about Cal Poly's, uh, challenge program that they were gonna have in June inviting high school kid. We're excited about the whole idea of space and cyber security, and so on those air something. So I think we have to do it. Continue to do what were the course the next several years. >>Awesome. Any other creative approaches that you guys see working or might be on idea, or just a kind of stoked the ideation out their internship. So obviously internships are known, but like there's gotta be new ways. >>I think you can take what Steve was talking about earlier getting students in high school, uh, and aligning them sometimes. Uh, that intern first internship, not just between the freshman sophomore year, but before they inter cal poly per se. And they're they're involved s So I think that's, uh, absolutely key. Getting them involved many other ways. Um, we have an example of of up Skilling a redeveloped work redevelopment here in the Central Coast. PG and e Diablo nuclear plant as going to decommission in around 2020 24. And so we have a ongoing partnership toe work on reposition those employees for for the future. So that's, you know, engineering and beyond. Uh, but think about that just in the manner that you were talking about. So the up skilling and re Skilling uh, on I think that's where you know, we were talking about that Purdue University. Other California universities have been dealing with online programs before cove it and now with co vid uh, so many more faculty or were pushed into that area. There's going to be much more going and talk about workforce development and up Skilling and Re Skilling The amount of training and education of our faculty across the country, uh, in in virtual, uh, and delivery has been huge. So there's always a silver linings in the cloud. >>I want to get your guys thoughts on one final question as we in the in the segment. And we've seen on the commercial side with cloud computing on these highly accelerated environments where you know, SAS business model subscription. That's on the business side. But >>one of The >>things that's clear in this trend is technology, and people work together and technology augments the people components. So I'd love to get your thoughts as we look at the world now we're living in co vid um, Cal Poly. You guys have remote learning Right now. It's a infancy. It's a whole new disruption, if you will, but also an opportunity to enable new ways to collaborate, Right? So if you look at people and technology, can you guys share your view and vision on how communities can be developed? How these digital technologies and people can work together faster to get to the truth or make a discovery higher to build the workforce? These air opportunities? How do you guys view this new digital transformation? >>Well, I think there's there's a huge opportunities and just what we're doing with this symposium. We're filming this on one day, and it's going to stream live, and then the three of us, the four of us, can participate and chat with participants while it's going on. That's amazing. And I appreciate you, John, you bringing that to this this symposium, I think there's more and more that we can do from a Cal poly perspective with our pedagogy. So you know, linked to learn by doing in person will always be important to us. But we see virtual. We see partnerships like this can expand and enhance our ability and minimize the in person time, decrease the time to degree enhanced graduation rate, eliminate opportunity gaps or students that don't have the same advantages. S so I think the technological aspect of this is tremendous. Then on the up Skilling and Re Skilling, where employees air all over, they can be reached virtually then maybe they come to a location or really advanced technology allows them to get hands on virtually, or they come to that location and get it in a hybrid format. Eso I'm I'm very excited about the future and what we can do, and it's gonna be different with every university with every partnership. It's one. Size does not fit all. >>It's so many possibilities. Bond. I could almost imagine a social network that has a verified, you know, secure clearance. I can jump in, have a little cloak of secrecy and collaborate with the d o. D. Possibly in the future. But >>these are the >>kind of kind of crazy ideas that are needed. Are your thoughts on this whole digital transformation cross policy? >>I think technology is gonna be revolutionary here, John. You know, we're focusing lately on what we call digital engineering to quicken the pace off, delivering capability to warfighter. As an example, I think a I machine language all that's gonna have a major play and how we operate in the future. We're embracing five G technologies writing ability Thio zero latency or I o t More automation off the supply chain. That sort of thing, I think, uh, the future ahead of us is is very encouraging. Thing is gonna do a lot for for national defense on certainly the security of the country. >>Steve, your final thoughts. Space systems are systems, and they're connected to other systems that are connected to people. Your thoughts on this digital transformation opportunity >>Such a great question in such a fun, great challenge ahead of us. Um echoing are my colleague's sentiments. I would add to it. You know, a lot of this has I think we should do some focusing on campaigning so that people can feel comfortable to include the Congress to do things a little bit differently. Um, you know, we're not attuned to doing things fast. Uh, but the dramatic You know, the way technology is just going like crazy right now. I think it ties back Thio hoping Thio, convince some of our senior leaders on what I call both sides of the Potomac River that it's worth taking these gamble. We do need to take some of these things very way. And I'm very confident, confident and excited and comfortable. They're just gonna be a great time ahead and all for the better. >>You know, e talk about D. C. Because I'm not a lawyer, and I'm not a political person, but I always say less lawyers, more techies in Congress and Senate. So I was getting job when I say that. Sorry. Presidential. Go ahead. >>Yeah, I know. Just one other point. Uh, and and Steve's alluded to this in bonded as well. I mean, we've got to be less risk averse in these partnerships. That doesn't mean reckless, but we have to be less risk averse. And I would also I have a zoo. You talk about technology. I have to reflect on something that happened in, uh, you both talked a bit about Bill Britton and his impact on Cal Poly and what we're doing. But we were faced a few years ago of replacing a traditional data a data warehouse, data storage data center, and we partner with a W S. And thank goodness we had that in progress on it enhanced our bandwidth on our campus before Cove. It hit on with this partnership with the digital transformation hub. So there is a great example where, uh, we we had that going. That's not something we could have started. Oh, covitz hit. Let's flip that switch. And so we have to be proactive on. We also have thio not be risk averse and do some things differently. Eyes that that is really salvage the experience for for students. Right now, as things are flowing, well, we only have about 12% of our courses in person. Uh, those essential courses, uh, and just grateful for those partnerships that have talked about today. >>Yeah, and it's a shining example of how being agile, continuous operations, these air themes that expand into space and the next workforce needs to be built. Gentlemen, thank you. very much for sharing your insights. I know. Bang, You're gonna go into the defense side of space and your other sessions. Thank you, gentlemen, for your time for great session. Appreciate it. >>Thank you. Thank you. >>Thank you. >>Thank you. Thank you. Thank you all. >>I'm John Furry with the Cube here in Palo Alto, California Covering and hosting with Cal Poly The Space and Cybersecurity Symposium 2020. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube space and cybersecurity. We have Jeff Armstrong's the president of California Polytechnic in space, Jeff will start with you. We know that the best work is done by balanced teams that include multiple and diverse perspectives. speaking to bang, we learned that Rachel sins, one of our liberal arts arts majors, on the forefront of innovation and really taking a unique progressive. of the National Security Space Association, to discuss a very important topic of Thank you so much bomb for those comments and you know, new challenges and new opportunities and new possibilities of the space community, we thank you for your long life long devotion to service to the drone coming over in the crime scene and, you know, mapping it out for you. Yeah, I really appreciate that And appreciate the comments of my colleagues on clock now on terms of the innovation cycles, and so you got to react differently. Because the workforce that air in schools and our folks re So the pipeline needs to be strengthened But it does have the same challenges. Steve, go ahead. the aspect That's a Professor Armstrong talked about earlier toe where you continue to work Once the students get to a place like Cal Poly or some of our other amazing Uh, and that continued partnership is the script has been flipped. How people the progressions of knowledge and learning truth. that is needed, what we've been working on for years of the, you know, Thio the modern version of what a public, successful private partnership looks like. This is the fault, if you will and not rely heavily in are the usual suspects for example, is the thing we call clear for success getting back Thio Uh, that and and love to follow up offline with you on that. You know the programs you get you particularly through We need to support a lot of programs we have in the U. D. So somehow we have to do a better idea, or just a kind of stoked the ideation out their internship. in the manner that you were talking about. And we've seen on the commercial side with cloud computing on these highly accelerated environments where you know, So I'd love to get your thoughts as we look at the world now we're living in co vid um, decrease the time to degree enhanced graduation rate, eliminate opportunity you know, secure clearance. kind of kind of crazy ideas that are needed. certainly the security of the country. and they're connected to other systems that are connected to people. that people can feel comfortable to include the Congress to do things a little bit differently. So I Eyes that that is really salvage the experience for Bang, You're gonna go into the defense side of Thank you. Thank you all. I'm John Furry with the Cube here in Palo Alto, California Covering and hosting with Cal
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Chuck | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Jakes | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Jake | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rachel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cal Poly | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
National Security Space Association | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Armstrong | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Northrop Grumman | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
PG | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chris Hansen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jane | PERSON | 0.99+ |
National Security Space Association | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chuck Beans | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California National Guard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boeing | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
National Security Space Association | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cal Poly | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bond | PERSON | 0.99+ |
United States Space Force | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
94% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Trump | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Richard Branson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California Cybersecurity Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States Space Command | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Congress | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Armstrong | PERSON | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
N S. A | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cal poly | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Elon Musk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
York Space Systems | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
National Centers of Academic Excellence in Cyber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Purdue University | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kazuhiro Gomi, NTT | Upgrade 2020 The NTT Research Summit
>> Narrator: From around the globe, it's theCUBE, covering the Upgrade 2020, the NTT Research Summit presented by NTT Research. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're in Palo Alto studio for our ongoing coverage of the Upgrade 2020, it's the NTT Research conference. It's our first year covering the event, it's actually the first year for the event inaugural, a year for the events, we're really, really excited to get into this. It's basic research that drives a whole lot of innovation, and we're really excited to have our next guest. He is Kazuhiro Gomi, he is the President and CEO of NTT Research. Kazu, great to see you. >> Hi, good to see you. >> Yeah, so let's jump into it. So this event, like many events was originally scheduled I think for March at Berkeley, clearly COVID came along and you guys had to make some changes. I wonder if you can just share a little bit about your thinking in terms of having this event, getting this great information out, but having to do it in a digital way and kind of rethinking the conference strategy. >> Sure, yeah. So NTT Research, we started our operations about a year ago, July, 2019. and I always wanted to show the world that to give a update of what we have done in the areas of basic and fundamental research. So we plan to do that in March, as you mentioned, however, that the rest of it to some extent history, we needed to cancel the event and then decided to do this time of the year through virtual. Something we learned, however, not everything is bad, by doing this virtual we can certainly reach out to so many peoples around the globe at the same time. So we're taking, I think, trying to get the best out of it. >> Right, right, so you've got a terrific lineup. So let's jump into a little bit. So first thing just about NTT Research, we're all familiar, if you've been around for a little while about Bell Labs, we're fortunate to have Xerox PARC up the street here in Palo Alto, these are kind of famous institutions doing basic research. People probably aren't as familiar at least in the states around NTT basic research. But when you think about real bottom line basic research and how it contributes ultimately, it gets into products, and solutions, and health care, and all kinds of places. How should people think about basic research and its role in ultimately coming to market in products, and services, and all different things. But you're getting way down into the weeds into the really, really basic hardcore technology. >> Sure, yeah, so let me just from my perspective, define the basic research versus some other research and development. For us that the basic research means that we don't necessarily have any like a product roadmap or commercialization roadmap, we just want to look at the fundamental core technology of all things. And from the timescale perspective obviously, not that we're not looking at something new, thing, next year, next six months, that kind of thing. We are looking at five years or sometimes longer than that, potentially 10 years down the road. But you mentioned about the Bell Lab and Xerox PARC. Yeah, well, they used to be such organizations in the United States, however, well, arguably those days have kind of gone, but so that's what's going on in the United States. In Japan, NTT has have done quite a bit of basic research over the years. And so we wanted to, I think because that a lot of the cases that we can talk about the end of the Moore's laws and then the, we are kind of scary time for that. The energy consumptions on ITs We need to make some huge, big, fundamental change has to happen to sustain our long-term development of the ideas and basically for the sake of human beings. >> Right, right. >> So NTT sees that and also we've been doing quite a bit of basic research in Japan. So we recognize this is a time that the let's expand this activities and then by doing, as a part of doing so is open up the research lab in Silicon Valley, where certainly we can really work better, work easier to with that the global talents in this field. So that's how we started this endeavor, like I said, last year. And so far, it's a tremendous progress that we have made, so that's where we are. >> That's great, so just a little bit more specific. So you guys are broken down into three labs as I understand, you've got the Physics, the PHI, which is Physics and Informatics, the CIS lab Cryptography and Information Security, and the MEI lab Medical and Health Informatics, and the conference has really laid out along those same tracks, really day one is a whole lot of stuff, or excuse me, they do to run the Physics and Informatics day. The next day is really Cryptography and Information Security, and then the Medical and Health Informatics. So those are super interesting but very diverse kind of buckets of fundamental research. And you guys are attacking all three of those pillars. >> Yup, so day one, general session, is that we cover the whole, all the topics. And but just that whole general topics. I think some people, those who want to understand what NTT research is all about, joining day one will be a great day to be, to understand more holistic what we are doing. However, given the type of research topic that we are tackling, we need the deep dive conversations, very specific to each topic by the specialist and the experts in each field. Therefore we have a day two, three, and four for a specific topics that we're going to talk about. So that's a configuration of this conference. >> Right, right, and I love. I just have to read a few of the session breakout titles 'cause I think they're just amazing and I always love learning new vocabulary words. Coherent nonlinear dynamics and combinatorial optimization language multipliers, indistinguishability obfuscation from well-founded assumptions, fully deniable communications and computation. I mean, a brief history of the quasi-adaptive NIZKs, which I don't even know what that stands for. (Gomi laughing) Really some interesting topics. But the other thing that jumps out when you go through the sessions is the representation of universities and really the topflight university. So you've got people coming from MIT, CalTech, Stanford, Notre Dame, Michigan, the list goes on and on. Talk to us about the role of academic institutions and how NTT works in conjunction with academic institutions, and how at this basic research level kind of the commercial academic interests align and come together, and work together to really move this basic research down the road. >> Sure, so the working with academic, especially at the top-notch universities are crucial for us. Obviously, that's where the experts in each field of the basic research doing their super activities and we definitely need to get connected, and then we need to accelerate our activities and together with the entities researchers. So that has been kind of one of the number one priority for us to jumpstart and get some going. So as you mentioned, Jeff, that we have a lineup of professors and researchers from each top-notch universities joining to this event and talking at a generous, looking at different sessions. So I'm sure that those who are listening in to those sessions, you will learn well what's going on from the NTT's mind or NTT researchers mind to tackle each problem. But at the same time you will get to hear that top level researchers and professors in each field. So I believe this is going to be a kind of unique, certainly session that to understand what's it's like in a research field of quantum computing, encryptions, and then medical informatics of the world. >> Right. >> So that's, I am sure it's going to be a pretty great lineups. >> Oh, absolutely, a lot of information exchange. And I'm not going to ask you to pick your favorite child 'cause that would be unfair, but what I am going to do is I noticed too that you also write for the Forbes Technology Council members. So you're publishing on Forbes, and one of the articles that you publish relatively recently was about biological digital twins. And this is a topic that I'm really interested in. We used to do a lot of stuff with GE and there was always a lot of conversation about digital twins, for turbines, and motors, and kind of all this big, heavy industrial equipment so that you could get ahead of the curve in terms of anticipating maintenance and basically kind of run simulations of its lifetime. Need concept, now, and that's applied to people in biology, whether that's your heart or maybe it's a bigger system, your cardiovascular system, or the person as a whole. I mean, that just opens up so much interesting opportunities in terms of modeling people and being able to run simulations. If they do things different, I would presume, eat different, walk a little bit more, exercise a little bit more. And you wrote about it, I wonder if you could share kind of your excitement about the potential for digital twins in the medical space. >> Sure, so I think that the benefit is very clear for a lot of people, I would hope that the ones, basically, the computer system can simulate or emulate your own body, not just a generic human body, it's the body for Kazu Gomi at the age of whatever. (Jeff laughing) And so if you get that precise simulation of your body you can do a lot of things. Oh, you, meaning I think a medical professional can do a lot of thing. You can predict what's going to happen to my body in the next year, six months, whatever. Or if I'm feeling sick or whatever the reasons and then the doctor wants to prescribe a few different medicines, but you can really test it out a different kind of medicines, not to you, but to the twin, medical twin then obviously is safer to do some kind of specific medicines or whatever. So anyway, those are the kind of visions that we have. And I have to admit that there's a lot of things, technically we have to overcome, and it will take a lot of years to get there. But I think it's a pretty good goal to define, so we said we did it and I talked with a couple of different experts and I am definitely more convinced that this is a very nice goal to set. However, well, just talking about the goal, just talking about those kinds of futuristic thing, you may just end up with a science fiction. So we need to be more specific, so we have the very researchers are breaking down into different pieces, how to get there, again, it's going to be a pretty long journey, but we're starting from that, they're try to get the digital twin for the cardiovascular system, so basically the create your own heart. Again, the important part is that this model of my heart is very similar to your heart, Jeff, but it's not identical it is somehow different. >> Right, right. >> So we are looking on it and there are certainly some, we're not the only one thinking something like this, there are definitely like-minded researchers in the world. So we are gathered together with those folks and then come up with the exchanging the ideas and coming up with that, the plans, and ideas, that's where we are. But like you said, this is really a exciting goal and exciting project. >> Right, and I like the fact that you consistently in all the background material that I picked up preparing for this today, this focus on tech for good and tech for helping the human species do better down the road. In another topic, in other blog post, you talked about and specifically what are 15 amazing technologies contributing to the greater good and you highlighted cryptography. So there's a lot of interesting conversations around encryption and depending kind of commercialization of quantum computing and how that can break all the existing kind of encryption. And there's going to be this whole renaissance in cryptography, why did you pick that amongst the entire pallet of technologies you can pick from, what's special about cryptography for helping people in the future? >> Okay, so encryption, I think most of the people, just when you hear the study of the encryption, you may think what the goal of these researchers or researches, you may think that you want to make your encryption more robust and more difficult to break. That you can probably imagine that's the type of research that we are doing. >> Jeff: Right. >> And yes, yes, we are doing that, but that's not the only direction that we are working on. Our researchers are working on different kinds of encryptions and basically encryptions controls that you can just reveal, say part of the data being encrypted, or depending upon that kind of attribute of whoever has the key, the information being revealed are slightly different. Those kinds of encryption, well, it's kind of hard to explain verbally, but functional encryption they call is becoming a reality. And I believe those inherit data itself has that protection mechanism, and also controlling who has access to the information is one of the keys to address the current status. Current status, what I mean by that is, that they're more connected world we are going to have, and more information are created through IOT and all that kind of stuff, more sensors out there, I think. So it is great on the one side that we can do a lot of things, but at the same time there's a tons of concerns from the perspective of privacy, and securities, and stuff, and then how to make those things happen together while addressing the concern and the leverage or the benefit you can create super complex accessing systems. But those things, I hate to say that there are some inherently bringing in some vulnerabilities and break at some point, which we don't want to see. >> Right. >> So I think having those securities and privacy mechanism in that the file itself is I think that one of the key to address those issues, again, get the benefit of that they're connected in this, and then while maintaining the privacy and security for the future. >> Right. >> So and then that's, in the end will be the better for everyone and a better society. So I couldn't pick other (Gomi and Jeff laughing) technology but I felt like this is easier for me to explain to a lot of people. So that's mainly the reasons that I went back launching. >> Well, you keep publishing, so I'm sure you'll work your way through most of the technologies over a period of time, but it's really good to hear there's a lot of talk about security not enough about privacy. There's usually the regs and the compliance laws lag, what's kind of happening in the marketplace. So it's good to hear that's really a piece of the conversation because without the privacy the other stuff is not as attractive. And we're seeing all types of issues that are coming up and the regs are catching up. So privacy is a super important piece. But the other thing that is so neat is to be exposed not being an academic, not being in this basic research every day, but have the opportunity to really hear at this level of detail, the amount of work that's being done by big brain smart people to move these basic technologies along, we deal often in kind of higher level applications versus the stuff that's really going on under the cover. So really a great opportunity to learn more and hear from, and probably understand some, understand not all about some of these great, kind of baseline technologies, really good stuff. >> Yup. >> Yeah, so thank-you for inviting us for the first one. And we'll be excited to sit in on some sessions and I'm going to learn. What's that one phrase that I got to learn? The N-I-K-Z-T. NIZKs. (laughs) >> NIZKs. (laughs) >> Yeah, NIZKs, the brief history of quasi-adaptive NI. >> Oh, all right, yeah, yeah. (Gomi and Jeff laughing) >> All right, Kazuhiro, I give you the final word- >> You will find out, yeah. >> You've been working on this thing for over a year, I'm sure you're excited to finally kind of let it out to the world, I wonder if you have any final thoughts you want to share before we send people back off to their sessions. >> Well, let's see, I'm sure if you're watching this video, you are almost there for that actual summit. It's about to start and so hope you enjoy the summit and in a physical, well, I mentioned about the benefit of this virtual, we can reach out to many people, but obviously there's also a flip side of the coin as well. With a physical, we can get more spontaneous conversations and more in-depth discussion, certainly we can do it, perhaps not today. It's more difficult to do it, but yeah, I encourage you to, I think I encouraged my researchers NTT side as well to basic communicate with all of you potentially and hopefully then to have more in-depth, meaningful conversations just starting from here. So just feel comfortable, perhaps just feel comfortable to reach out to me and then all the other NTT folks. And then now, also that the researchers from other organizations, I'm sure they're looking for this type of interactions moving forward as well, yeah. >> Terrific, well, thank-you for that open invitation and you heard it everybody, reach out, and touch base, and communicate, and engage. And it's not quite the same as being physical in the halls, but that you can talk to a whole lot more people. So Kazu, again, thanks for inviting us. Congratulations on the event and really glad to be here covering it. >> Yeah, thank-you very much, Jeff, appreciate it. >> All right, thank-you. He's Kazu, I'm Jeff, we are at the Upgrade 2020, the NTT Research Summit. Thanks for watching, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
the NTT Research Summit of the Upgrade 2020, it's and you guys had to make some changes. and then decided to do this time and health care, and all kinds of places. of the cases that we can talk that the let's expand this and the MEI lab Medical and the experts in each field. and really the topflight university. But at the same time you will get to hear it's going to be a pretty great lineups. and one of the articles that so basically the create your own heart. researchers in the world. Right, and I like the fact and more difficult to break. is one of the keys to and security for the future. So that's mainly the reasons but have the opportunity to really hear and I'm going to learn. NIZKs. Yeah, NIZKs, the brief (Gomi and Jeff laughing) it out to the world, and hopefully then to have more in-depth, and really glad to be here covering it. Yeah, thank-you very the NTT Research Summit.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kazuhiro Gomi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CalTech | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NTT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Kazu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bell Lab | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gomi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bell Labs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kazu Gomi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kazuhiro | PERSON | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Moore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
NTT Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Berkeley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Forbes Technology Council | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Xerox PARC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stanford | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NTT Research Summit | EVENT | 0.99+ |
15 amazing technologies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
July, 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
each topic | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
NTT Research | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Upgrade 2020 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each field | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
three labs | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
each problem | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Michigan | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
next six months | DATE | 0.95+ |
Notre Dame | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
one side | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
one phrase | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
over a year | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Physics and Informatics | EVENT | 0.89+ |
twin | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
each top- | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
CIS | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Medical and Health Informatics | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
one of | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
Forbes | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
Armstrong and Guhamad and Jacques V1
>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's The Cube, covering Space and Cybersecurity Symposium 2020, hosted by Cal Poly. >> Everyone, welcome to this special virtual conference, the Space and Cybersecurity Symposium 2020 put on by Cal Poly with support from The Cube. I'm John Furey, your host and master of ceremony's got a great topic today, and this session is really the intersection of space and cybersecurity. This topic, and this conversation is a cybersecurity workforce development through public and private partnerships. And we've got a great lineup, we've Jeff Armstrong is the president of California Polytechnic State University, also known as Cal Poly. Jeffrey, thanks for jumping on and Bong Gumahad. The second, Director of C4ISR Division, and he's joining us from the Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for the acquisition and sustainment of Department of Defense, DOD, and of course Steve Jacques is Executive Director, founder National Security Space Association, and managing partner at Velos. Gentlemen, thank you for joining me for this session, we've got an hour of conversation, thanks for coming on. >> Thank you. >> So we've got a virtual event here, we've got an hour to have a great conversation, I'd love for you guys to do an opening statement on how you see the development through public and private partnerships around cybersecurity and space, Jeff, we'll start with you. >> Well, thanks very much, John, it's great to be on with all of you. On behalf of Cal Poly, welcome everyone. Educating the workforce of tomorrow is our mission at Cal Poly, whether that means traditional undergraduates, masters students, or increasingly, mid-career professionals looking to upskill or re-skill. Our signature pedagogy is learn by doing, which means that our graduates arrive at employers, ready day one with practical skills and experience. We have long thought of ourselves as lucky to be on California's beautiful central coast, but in recent years, as we've developed closer relationships with Vandenberg Air Force Base, hopefully the future permanent headquarters of the United States Space Command with Vandenberg and other regional partners, We have discovered that our location is even more advantageous than we thought. We're just 50 miles away from Vandenberg, a little closer than UC Santa Barbara and the base represents the Southern border of what we have come to think of as the central coast region. Cal Poly and Vandenberg Air Force Base have partnered to support regional economic development, to encourage the development of a commercial space port, to advocate for the space command headquarters coming to Vandenberg and other ventures. These partnerships have been possible because both parties stand to benefit. Vandenberg, by securing new streams of revenue, workforce, and local supply chain and Cal Poly by helping to grow local jobs for graduates, internship opportunities for students and research and entrepreneurship opportunities for faculty and staff. Crucially, what's good for Vandenberg Air Force Base and for Cal Poly is also good for the central coast and the U.S., creating new head of household jobs, infrastructure, and opportunity. Our goal is that these new jobs bring more diversity and sustainability for the region. This regional economic development has taken on a life of its own, spawning a new nonprofit called REACH which coordinates development efforts from Vandenberg Air Force Base in the South to Camp Roberts in the North. Another factor that has facilitated our relationship with Vandenberg Air Force Base is that we have some of the same friends. For example, Northrop Grumman has as long been an important defense contractor and an important partner to Cal Poly, funding scholarships in facilities that have allowed us to stay current with technology in it to attract highly qualified students for whom Cal Poly's costs would otherwise be prohibitive. For almost 20 years, Northrop Grumman has funded scholarships for Cal Poly students. This year, they're funding 64 scholarships, some directly in our College of Engineering and most through our Cal Poly Scholars Program. Cal Poly scholars support both incoming freshmen and transfer students. These are especially important, 'cause it allows us to provide additional support and opportunities to a group of students who are mostly first generation, low income and underrepresented, and who otherwise might not choose to attend Cal Poly. They also allow us to recruit from partner high schools with large populations of underrepresented minority students, including the Fortune High School in Elk Grove, which we developed a deep and lasting connection. We know that the best work is done by balanced teams that include multiple and diverse perspectives. These scholarships help us achieve that goal and I'm sure you know Northrop Grumman was recently awarded a very large contract to modernize the U.S. ICBM armory with some of the work being done at Vandenberg Air Force Base, thus supporting the local economy and protecting... Protecting our efforts in space requires partnerships in the digital realm. Cal Poly has partnered with many private companies such as AWS. Our partnerships with Amazon Web Services has enabled us to train our students with next generation cloud engineering skills, in part, through our jointly created digital transformation hub. Another partnership example is among Cal Poly's California Cyber Security Institute College of Engineering and the California National Guard. This partnership is focused on preparing a cyber-ready workforce, by providing faculty and students with a hands on research and learning environment side by side with military law enforcement professionals and cyber experts. We also have a long standing partnership with PG&E most recently focused on workforce development and redevelopment. Many of our graduates do indeed go on to careers in aerospace and defense industry. As a rough approximation, more than 4,500 Cal Poly graduates list aerospace or defense as their employment sector on LinkedIn. And it's not just our engineers in computer sciences. When I was speaking to our fellow panelists not too long ago, speaking to Bong, we learned that Rachel Sims, one of our liberal arts majors is working in his office, so shout out to you, Rachel. And then finally, of course, some of our graduates soar to extraordinary heights, such as Commander Victor Glover, who will be heading to the International Space Station later this year. As I close, all of which is to say that we're deeply committed to workforce development and redevelopment, that we understand the value of public-private partnerships, and that we're eager to find new ways in which to benefit everyone from this further cooperation. So we're committed to the region, the state and the nation, in our past efforts in space, cyber security and links to our partners at, as I indicated, aerospace industry and governmental partners provides a unique position for us to move forward in the interface of space and cyber security. Thank you so much, John. >> President Armstrong, thank you very much for the comments and congratulations to Cal Poly for being on the forefront of innovation and really taking a unique, progressive view and want to tip a hat to you guys over there, thank you very much for those comments, appreciate it. Bong, Department of Defense. Exciting, you've got to defend the nation, space is global, your opening statement. >> Yes, sir, thanks John, appreciate that. Thank you everybody, I'm honored to be in this panel along with Preston Armstrong of Cal Poly and my longtime friend and colleague Steve Jacques of the National Security Space Association to discuss a very important topic of a cybersecurity workforce development as President Armstrong alluded to. I'll tell you, both of these organizations, Cal Poly and the NSSA have done and continue to do an exceptional job at finding talent, recruiting them and training current and future leaders and technical professionals that we vitally need for our nation's growing space programs, as well as our collective national security. Earlier today, during session three, I, along with my colleague, Chris Samson discussed space cyber security and how the space domain is changing the landscape of future conflicts. I discussed the rapid emergence of commercial space with the proliferation of hundreds, if not thousands of satellites, providing a variety of services including communications, allowing for global internet connectivity, as one example. Within DOD, we continued to look at how we can leverage this opportunity. I'll tell you, one of the enabling technologies, is the use of small satellites, which are inherently cheaper and perhaps more flexible than the traditional bigger systems that we have historically used and employed for DOD. Certainly not lost on me is the fact that Cal Poly pioneered CubeSats 28, 27 years ago, and they set a standard for the use of these systems today. So they saw the value and benefit gained way ahead of everybody else it seems. And Cal Poly's focus on training and education is commendable. I'm especially impressed by the efforts of another of Steven's colleague, the current CIO, Mr. Bill Britton, with his high energy push to attract the next generation of innovators. Earlier this year, I had planned on participating in this year's cyber innovation challenge in June, Oops, Cal Poly hosts California middle, and high school students, and challenge them with situations to test their cyber knowledge. I tell you, I wish I had that kind of opportunity when I was a kid, unfortunately, the pandemic changed the plan, but I truly look forward to future events such as these, to participate in. Now, I want to recognize my good friend, Steve Jacques, whom I've known for perhaps too long of a time here, over two decades or so, who was an acknowledged space expert and personally I've truly applaud him for having the foresight a few years back to form the National Security Space Association to help the entire space enterprise navigate through not only technology, but policy issues and challenges and paved the way for operationalizing space. Space, it certainly was fortifying domain, it's not a secret anymore, and while it is a unique area, it shares a lot of common traits with the other domains, such as land, air, and sea, obviously all are strategically important to the defense of the United States. In conflict, they will all be contested and therefore they all need to be defended. One domain alone will not win future conflicts, and in a joint operation, we must succeed in all. So defending space is critical, as critical as to defending our other operational domains. Funny, space is the only sanctuary available only to the government. Increasingly as I discussed in a previous session, commercial space is taking the lead in a lot of different areas, including R&D, the so-called new space. So cybersecurity threat is even more demanding and even more challenging. The U.S. considers and futhered access to and freedom to operate in space, vital to advancing security, economic prosperity and scientific knowledge of the country, thus making cyberspace an inseparable component of America's financial, social government and political life. We stood up US Space Force a year ago or so as the newest military service. Like the other services, its mission is to organize, train and equip space forces in order to protect U.S. and allied interest in space and to provide spacecape builders who joined force. Imagine combining that U.S. Space Force with the U.S. Cyber Command to unify the direction of the space and cyberspace operation, strengthen DOD capabilities and integrate and bolster a DOD cyber experience. Now, of course, to enable all of this requires a trained and professional cadre of cyber security experts, combining a good mix of policy, as well as a high technical skill set. Much like we're seeing in STEM, we need to attract more people to this growing field. Now, the DOD has recognized the importance to the cybersecurity workforce, and we have implemented policies to encourage its growth. Back in 2013, the Deputy Secretary of Defense signed a DOD Cyberspace Workforce Strategy, to create a comprehensive, well-equipped cyber security team to respond to national security concerns. Now, this strategy also created a program that encourages collaboration between the DOD and private sector employees. We call this the Cyber Information Technology Exchange program, or CITE that it's an exchange program, which is very interesting in which a private sector employee can naturally work for the DOD in a cyber security position that spans across multiple mission critical areas, important to the DOD. A key responsibility of the cyber security community is military leaders, unrelated threats, and the cyber security actions we need to have to defeat these threats. We talked about rapid acquisition, agile business processes and practices to speed up innovation, likewise, cyber security must keep up with this challenge. So cyber security needs to be right there with the challenges and changes, and this requires exceptional personnel. We need to attract talent, invest in the people now to grow a robust cybersecurity workforce for the future. I look forward to the panel discussion, John, thank you. >> Thank you so much, Bob for those comments and, you know, new challenges or new opportunities and new possibilities and freedom to operate in space is critical, thank you for those comments, looking forward to chatting further. Steve Jacques, Executive Director of NSSA, you're up, opening statement. >> Thank you, John and echoing Bongs, thanks to Cal Poly for pulling this important event together and frankly, for allowing the National Security Space Association be a part of it. Likewise, on behalf of the association, I'm delighted and honored to be on this panel of President Armstrong, along with my friend and colleague, Bong Gumahad. Something for you all to know about Bong, he spent the first 20 years of his career in the Air Force doing space programs. He then went into industry for several years and then came back into government to serve, very few people do that. So Bong, on behalf of the space community, we thank you for your lifelong devotion to service to our nation, we really appreciate that. And I also echo a Bong shout out to that guy, Bill Britton. who's been a long time co-conspirator of ours for a long time, and you're doing great work there in the cyber program at Cal Poly, Bill, keep it up. But Professor Armstrong, keep a close eye on him. (laughter) I would like to offer a little extra context to the great comments made by President Armstrong and Bong. And in our view, the timing of this conference really could not be any better. We all recently reflected again on that tragic 9/11 surprise attack on our homeland and it's an appropriate time we think to take pause. While a percentage of you in the audience here weren't even born or were babies then, for the most of us, it still feels like yesterday. And moreover, a tragedy like 9/11 has taught us a lot to include, to be more vigilant, always keep our collective eyes and ears open, to include those "eyes and ears from space," making sure nothing like this ever happens again. So this conference is a key aspect, protecting our nation requires we work in a cyber secure environment at all times. But you know, the fascinating thing about space systems is we can't see 'em. Now sure, we see space launches, man, there's nothing more invigorating than that. But after launch they become invisible, so what are they really doing up there? What are they doing to enable our quality of life in the United States and in the world? Well to illustrate, I'd like to paraphrase elements of an article in Forbes magazine, by Bongs and my good friend, Chuck Beames, Chuck is a space guy, actually had Bongs job a few years in the Pentagon. He's now Chairman and Chief Strategy Officer at York Space Systems and in his spare time, he's Chairman of the Small Satellites. Chuck speaks in words that everyone can understand, so I'd like to give you some of his words out of his article, paraphrase somewhat, so these are Chuck's words. "Let's talk about average Joe and plain Jane. "Before heading to the airport for a business trip "to New York city, Joe checks the weather forecast, "informed by NOAA's weather satellites, "to see what to pack for the trip. "He then calls an Uber, that space app everybody uses, "it matches riders with drivers via GPS, "to take him to the airport. "So Joe has launched in the airport, "unbeknownst to him, his organic lunch is made "with the help of precision farming "made possible to optimize the irrigation and fertilization "with remote spectral sensing coming from space and GPS. "On the plane, the pilot navigates around weather, "aided by GPS and NOAA's weather satellites "and Joe makes his meeting on time "to join his New York colleagues in a video call "with a key customer in Singapore, "made possible by telecommunication satellites. "En route to his next meeting, "Joe receives notice changing the location of the meeting "to the other side of town. "So he calmly tells Siri to adjust the destination "and his satellite-guided Google maps redirect him "to the new location. "That evening, Joe watches the news broadcast via satellite, "report details of meeting among world leaders, "discussing the developing crisis in Syria. "As it turns out various forms of "'remotely sensed information' collected from satellites "indicate that yet another banned chemical weapon "may have been used on its own people. "Before going to bed, Joe decides to call his parents "and congratulate them for their wedding anniversary "as they cruise across the Atlantic, "made possible again by communication satellites "and Joe's parents can enjoy the call "without even wondering how it happened. "The next morning back home, "Joe's wife, Jane is involved in a car accident. "Her vehicle skids off the road, she's knocked unconscious, "but because of her satellite equipped OnStar system, "the crash is detected immediately, "and first responders show up on the scene in time. "Joe receives the news, books an early trip home, "sends flowers to his wife "as he orders another Uber to the airport. "Over that 24 hours, "Joe and Jane used space system applications "for nearly every part of their day. "Imagine the consequences if at any point "they were somehow denied these services, "whether they be by natural causes or a foreign hostility. "In each of these satellite applications used in this case, "were initially developed for military purposes "and continued to be, but also have remarkable application "on our way of life, just many people just don't know that." So ladies and gentlemen, now you know, thanks to Chuck Beames. Well, the United States has a proud heritage of being the world's leading space-faring nation. Dating back to the Eisenhower and Kennedy years, today, we have mature and robust systems operating from space, providing overhead reconnaissance to "watch and listen," provide missile warning, communications, positioning, navigation, and timing from our GPS system, much of which you heard in Lieutenant General JT Thomson's earlier speech. These systems are not only integral to our national security, but also to our quality of life. As Chuck told us, we simply no longer can live without these systems as a nation and for that matter, as a world. But over the years, adversaries like China, Russia and other countries have come to realize the value of space systems and are aggressively playing catch up while also pursuing capabilities that will challenge our systems. As many of you know, in 2007, China demonstrated its ASAT system by actually shooting down one of its own satellites and has been aggressively developing counterspace systems to disrupt ours. So in a heavily congested space environment, our systems are now being contested like never before and will continue to be. Well, as a Bong mentioned, the United States have responded to these changing threats. In addition to adding ways to protect our system, the administration and the Congress recently created the United States Space Force and the operational United States Space Command, the latter of which you heard President Armstrong and other Californians hope is going to be located at Vandenberg Air Force Base. Combined with our intelligence community, today we have focused military and civilian leadership now in space, and that's a very, very good thing. Commensurately on the industry side, we did create the National Security Space Association, devoted solely to supporting the National Security Space Enterprise. We're based here in the DC area, but we have arms and legs across the country and we are loaded with extraordinary talent in scores of former government executives. So NSSA is joined at the hip with our government customers to serve and to support. We're busy with a multitude of activities underway, ranging from a number of thought-provoking policy papers, our recurring spacetime webcasts, supporting Congress's space power caucus, and other main serious efforts. Check us out at nssaspace.org. One of our strategic priorities and central to today's events is to actively promote and nurture the workforce development, just like Cal-Poly. We will work with our U.S. government customers, industry leaders, and academia to attract and recruit students to join the space world, whether in government or industry, and to assist in mentoring and training as their careers progress. On that point, we're delighted to be working with Cal Poly as we hopefully will undertake a new pilot program with them very soon. So students stay tuned, something I can tell you, space is really cool. While our nation's satellite systems are technical and complex, our nation's government and industry workforce is highly diverse, with a combination of engineers, physicists and mathematicians, but also with a large non-technical expertise as well. Think about how government gets these systems designed, manufactured, launching into orbit and operating. They do this via contracts with our aerospace industry, requiring talents across the board, from cost estimating, cost analysis, budgeting, procurement, legal, and many other support tasks that are integral to the mission. Many thousands of people work in the space workforce, tens of billions of dollars every year. This is really cool stuff and no matter what your education background, a great career to be part of. In summary, as Bong had mentioned as well, there's a great deal of exciting challenges ahead. We will see a new renaissance in space in the years ahead and in some cases it's already begun. Billionaires like Jeff Bezos, Elon Musk, Sir Richard Branson, are in the game, stimulating new ideas and business models. Other private investors and startup companies, space companies are now coming in from all angles. The exponential advancement of technology and micro electronics now allows a potential for a plethora of small sat systems to possibly replace older satellites, the size of a Greyhound bus. It's getting better by the day and central to this conference, cybersecurity is paramount to our nation's critical infrastructure in space. So once again, thanks very much and I look forward to the further conversation. >> Steve, thank you very much. Space is cool, it's relevant, but it's important as you pointed out in your awesome story about how it impacts our life every day so I really appreciate that great story I'm glad you took the time to share that. You forgot the part about the drone coming over in the crime scene and, you know, mapping it out for you, but we'll add that to the story later, great stuff. My first question is, let's get into the conversations, because I think this is super important. President Armstrong, I'd like you to talk about some of the points that was teased out by Bong and Steve. One in particular is the comment around how military research was important in developing all these capabilities, which is impacting all of our lives through that story. It was the military research that has enabled a generation and generation of value for consumers. This is kind of this workforce conversation, there are opportunities now with research and grants, and this is a funding of innovation that is highly accelerated, it's happening very quickly. Can you comment on how research and the partnerships to get that funding into the universities is critical? >> Yeah, I really appreciate that and appreciate the comments of my colleagues. And it really boils down to me to partnerships, public-private partnerships, you have mentioned Northrop Grumman, but we have partnerships with Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Raytheon, Space X, JPL, also member of an organization called Business Higher Education Forum, which brings together university presidents and CEOs of companies. There's been focused on cybersecurity and data science and I hope that we can spill into cybersecurity and space. But those partnerships in the past have really brought a lot forward. At Cal Poly, as mentioned, we've been involved with CubeSat, we've have some secure work, and we want to plan to do more of that in the future. Those partnerships are essential, not only for getting the R&D done, but also the students, the faculty, whether they're master's or undergraduate can be involved with that work, they get that real life experience, whether it's on campus or virtually now during COVID or at the location with the partner, whether it may be governmental or industry, and then they're even better equipped to hit the ground running. And of course we'd love to see more of our students graduate with clearance so that they could do some of that secure work as well. So these partnerships are absolutely critical and it's also in the context of trying to bring the best and the brightest in all demographics of California and the U.S. into this field, to really be successful. So these partnerships are essential and our goal is to grow them just like I know our other colleagues in the CSU and the UC are planning to do. >> You know, just as my age I've seen, I grew up in the eighties and in college and they're in that system's generation and the generation before me, they really kind of pioneered the space that spawned the computer revolution. I mean, you look at these key inflection points in our lives, they were really funded through these kinds of real deep research. Bong, talk about that because, you know, we're living in an age of cloud and Bezos was mentioned, Elon Musk, Sir Richard Branson, you got new ideas coming in from the outside, you have an accelerated clock now in terms of the innovation cycles and so you got to react differently, you guys have programs to go outside of the defense department, how important is this because the workforce that are in schools and/or folks re-skilling are out there and you've been on both sides of the table, so share your thoughts. >> No, thanks Johnny, thanks for the opportunity to respond to, and that's what, you know, you hit on the nose back in the 80's, R&D and space especially was dominated by government funding, contracts and so on, but things have changed as Steve pointed out, allow these commercial entities funded by billionaires are coming out of the woodwork, funding R&D so they're taking the lead, so what we can do within the DOD in government is truly take advantage of the work they've done. And since they're, you know, paving the way to new approaches and new way of doing things and I think we can certainly learn from that and leverage off of that, saves us money from an R&D standpoint, while benefiting from the product that they deliver. You know, within DOD, talking about workforce development, you know, we have prioritized and we have policies now to attract and retain the talent we need. I had the folks do some research and it looks like from a cybersecurity or workforce standpoint, a recent study done, I think last year in 2019, found that the cyber security workforce gap in U.S. is nearing half a million people, even though it is a growing industry. So the pipeline needs to be strengthened, getting people through, you know, starting young and through college, like Professor Armstrong indicated because we're going to need them to be in place, you know, in a period of about maybe a decade or so. On top of that, of course, is the continuing issue we have with the gap with STEM students. We can't afford not have expertise in place to support all the things we're doing within DoD, not only DoD but the commercial side as well, thank you. >> How's the gap get filled, I mean, this is, again, you've got cybersecurity, I mean, with space it's a whole other kind of surface area if you will, it's not really surface area, but it is an IOT device if you think about it, but it does have the same challenges, that's kind of current and progressive with cybersecurity. Where's the gap get filled, Steve or President Armstrong, I mean, how do you solve the problem and address this gap in the workforce? What are some solutions and what approaches do we need to put in place? >> Steve, go ahead., I'll follow up. >> Okay, thanks, I'll let you correct me. (laughter) It's a really good question, and the way I would approach it is to focus on it holistically and to acknowledge it upfront and it comes with our teaching, et cetera, across the board. And from an industry perspective, I mean, we see it, we've got to have secure systems in everything we do, and promoting this and getting students at early ages and mentoring them and throwing internships at them is so paramount to the whole cycle. And that's kind of, it really takes a focused attention and we continue to use the word focus from an NSSA perspective. We know the challenges that are out there. There are such talented people in the workforce, on the government side, but not nearly enough of them and likewise on the industry side, we could use more as well, but when you get down to it, you know, we can connect dots, you know, the aspects that Professor Armstrong talked about earlier to where you continue to work partnerships as much as you possibly can. We hope to be a part of that network, that ecosystem if you will, of taking common objectives and working together to kind of make these things happen and to bring the power, not just of one or two companies, but of our entire membership thereabout. >> President Armstrong-- >> Yeah, I would also add it again, it's back to the partnerships that I talked about earlier, one of our partners is high schools and schools Fortune, Margaret Fortune, who worked in a couple of administrations in California across party lines and education, their fifth graders all visit Cal Poly, and visit our learned-by-doing lab. And you've got to get students interested in STEM at an early age. We also need the partnerships, the scholarships, the financial aid, so the students can graduate with minimal to no debt to really hit the ground running and that's exacerbated and really stress now with this COVID induced recession. California supports higher education at a higher rate than most states in the nation, but that has brought this year for reasons all understand due to COVID. And so our partnerships, our creativity, and making sure that we help those that need the most help financially, that's really key because the gaps are huge. As my colleagues indicated, you know, half a million jobs and I need you to look at the students that are in the pipeline, we've got to enhance that. And the placement rates are amazing once the students get to a place like Cal Poly or some of our other amazing CSU and UC campuses, placement rates are like 94%. Many of our engineers, they have jobs lined up a year before they graduate. So it's just going to take a key partnerships working together and that continued partnership with government local, of course, our state, the CSU, and partners like we have here today, both Steve and Bong so partnerships is the thing. >> You know, that's a great point-- >> I could add, >> Okay go ahead. >> All right, you know, the collaboration with universities is one that we put on lot of emphasis here, and it may not be well known fact, but just an example of national security, the AUC is a national centers of academic excellence in cyber defense works with over 270 colleges and universities across the United States to educate and certify future cyber first responders as an example. So that's vibrant and healthy and something that we ought to take advantage of. >> Well, I got the brain trust here on this topic. I want to get your thoughts on this one point, 'cause I'd like to define, you know, what is a public-private partnership because the theme that's coming out of the symposium is the script has been flipped, it's a modern era, things are accelerated, you've got security, so you've got all of these things kind of happenning it's a modern approach and you're seeing a digital transformation play out all over the world in business and in the public sector. So what is a modern public-private partnership and what does it look like today because people are learning differently. COVID has pointed out, which is that we're seeing right now, how people, the progressions of knowledge and learning, truth, it's all changing. How do you guys view the modern version of public-private partnership and some examples and some proof points, can you guys share that? We'll start with you, Professor Armstrong. >> Yeah, as I indicated earlier, we've had, and I could give other examples, but Northrop Grumman, they helped us with a cyber lab many years ago that is maintained directly, the software, the connection outside it's its own unit so the students can learn to hack, they can learn to penetrate defenses and I know that that has already had some considerations of space, but that's a benefit to both parties. So a good public-private partnership has benefits to both entities and the common factor for universities with a lot of these partnerships is the talent. The talent that is needed, what we've been working on for years of, you know, the undergraduate or master's or PhD programs, but now it's also spilling into upskilling and reskilling, as jobs, you know, folks who are in jobs today that didn't exist two years, three years, five years ago, but it also spills into other aspects that can expand even more. We're very fortunate we have land, there's opportunities, we have ONE Tech project. We are expanding our tech park, I think we'll see opportunities for that and it'll be adjusted due to the virtual world that we're all learning more and more about it, which we were in before COVID. But I also think that that person to person is going to be important, I want to make sure that I'm driving across a bridge or that satellite's being launched by the engineer that's had at least some in person training to do that in that experience, especially as a first time freshman coming on campus, getting that experience, expanding it as an adult, and we're going to need those public-private partnerships in order to continue to fund those at a level that is at the excellence we need for these STEM and engineering fields. >> It's interesting people and technology can work together and these partnerships are the new way. Bongs too with reaction to the modern version of what a public successful private partnership looks like. >> If I could jump in John, I think, you know, historically DOD's had a high bar to overcome if you will, in terms of getting rapid... pulling in new companies, miss the fall if you will, and not rely heavily on the usual suspects, of vendors and the like, and I think the DOD has done a good job over the last couple of years of trying to reduce that burden and working with us, you know, the Air Force, I think they're pioneering this idea around pitch days, where companies come in, do a two-hour pitch and immediately notified of, you know, of an a award, without having to wait a long time to get feedback on the quality of the product and so on. So I think we're trying to do our best to strengthen that partnership with companies outside of the main group of people that we typically use. >> Steve, any reaction, any comment to add? >> Yeah, I would add a couple and these are very excellent thoughts. It's about taking a little gamble by coming out of your comfort zone, you know, the world that Bong and I, Bong lives in and I used to live in the past, has been quite structured. It's really about, we know what the threat is, we need to go fix it, we'll design as if as we go make it happen, we'll fly it. Life is so much more complicated than that and so it's really, to me, I mean, you take an example of the pitch days of Bong talks about, I think taking a gamble by attempting to just do a lot of pilot programs, work the trust factor between government folks and the industry folks and academia, because we are all in this together in a lot of ways. For example, I mean, we just sent a paper to the white house at their request about, you know, what would we do from a workforce development perspective and we hope to embellish on this over time once the initiative matures, but we have a piece of it for example, is a thing we call "clear for success," getting back to president Armstrong's comments so at a collegiate level, you know, high, high, high quality folks are in high demand. So why don't we put together a program that grabs kids in their underclass years, identifies folks that are interested in doing something like this, get them scholarships, have a job waiting for them that they're contracted for before they graduate, and when they graduate, they walk with an SCI clearance. We believe that can be done, so that's an example of ways in which public-private partnerships can happen to where you now have a talented kid ready to go on day one. We think those kinds of things can happen, it just gets back down to being focused on specific initiatives, giving them a chance and run as many pilot programs as you can, like pitch days. >> That's a great point, it's a good segue. Go ahead, President Armstrong. >> I just want to jump in and echo both the Bong and Steve's comments, but Steve that, you know, your point of, you know our graduates, we consider them ready day one, well they need to be ready day one and ready to go secure. We totally support that and love to follow up offline with you on that. That's exciting and needed, very much needed more of it, some of it's happening, but we certainly have been thinking a lot about that and making some plans. >> And that's a great example, a good segue. My next question is kind of re-imagining these workflows is kind of breaking down the old way and bringing in kind of the new way, accelerate all kinds of new things. There are creative ways to address this workforce issue and this is the next topic, how can we employ new creative solutions because let's face it, you know, it's not the days of get your engineering degree and go interview for a job and then get slotted in and get the intern, you know, the programs and you'd matriculate through the system. This is multiple disciplines, cybersecurity points at that. You could be smart in math and have a degree in anthropology and be one of the best cyber talents on the planet. So this is a new, new world, what are some creative approaches that's going to work for you? >> Alright, good job, one of the things, I think that's a challenge to us is, you know, somehow we got me working for, with the government, sexy right? You know, part of the challenge we have is attracting the right level of skill sets and personnel but, you know, we're competing, oftentimes, with the commercial side, the gaming industry as examples is a big deal. And those are the same talents we need to support a lot of the programs that we have in DOD. So somehow we have do a better job to Steve's point about making the work within DOD, within the government, something that they would be interested early on. So attract them early, you know, I could not talk about Cal Poly's challenge program that they were going to have in June inviting high school kids really excited about the whole idea of space and cyber security and so on. Those are some of the things that I think we have to do and continue to do over the course of the next several years. >> Awesome, any other creative approaches that you guys see working or might be an idea, or just to kind of stoke the ideation out there? Internships, obviously internships are known, but like, there's got to be new ways. >> Alright, I think you can take what Steve was talking about earlier, getting students in high school and aligning them sometimes at first internship, not just between the freshman and sophomore year, but before they enter Cal Poly per se and they're involved. So I think that's absolutely key, getting them involved in many other ways. We have an example of upskilling or work redevelopment here in the central coast, PG&E Diablo nuclear plant that is going to decommission in around 2024. And so we have a ongoing partnership to work and reposition those employees for the future. So that's, you know, engineering and beyond but think about that just in the manner that you were talking about. So the upskilling and reskilling, and I think that's where, you know, we were talking about that Purdue University, other California universities have been dealing with online programs before COVID, and now with COVID so many more Faculty were pushed into that area, there's going to be a much more going and talk about workforce development in upskilling and reskilling, the amount of training and education of our faculty across the country in virtual and delivery has been huge. So there's always a silver linings in the cloud. >> I want to get your guys' thoughts on one final question as we end the segment, and we've seen on the commercial side with cloud computing on these highly accelerated environments where, you know, SAS business model subscription, and that's on the business side, but one of the things that's clear in this trend is technology and people work together and technology augments the people components. So I'd love to get your thoughts as we look at a world now, we're living in COVID, and Cal Poly, you guys have remote learning right now, it's at the infancy, it's a whole new disruption, if you will, but also an opportunity enable new ways to encollaborate, So if you look at people and technology, can you guys share your view and vision on how communities can be developed, how these digital technologies and people can work together faster to get to the truth or make a discovery, hire, develop the workforce, these are opportunities, how do you guys view this new digital transformation? >> Well, I think there's huge opportunities and just what we're doing with this symposium, we're filming this on Monday and it's going to stream live and then the three of us, the four of us can participate and chat with participants while it's going on. That's amazing and I appreciate you, John, you bringing that to this symposium. I think there's more and more that we can do. From a Cal Poly perspective, with our pedagogy so, you know, linked to learn by doing in-person will always be important to us, but we see virtual, we see partnerships like this, can expand and enhance our ability and minimize the in-person time, decrease the time to degree, enhance graduation rate, eliminate opportunity gaps for students that don't have the same advantages. So I think the technological aspect of this is tremendous. Then on the upskilling and reskilling, where employees are all over, they can re be reached virtually, and then maybe they come to a location or really advanced technology allows them to get hands on virtually, or they come to that location and get it in a hybrid format. So I'm very excited about the future and what we can do, and it's going to be different with every university, with every partnership. It's one size does not fit all, There's so many possibilities, Bong, I can almost imagine that social network that has a verified, you know, secure clearance. I can jump in, and have a little cloak of secrecy and collaborate with the DOD possibly in the future. But these are the kind of crazy ideas that are needed, your thoughts on this whole digital transformation cross-pollination. >> I think technology is going to be revolutionary here, John, you know, we're focusing lately on what we call visual engineering to quicken the pace of the delivery capability to warfighter as an example, I think AI, Machine Language, all that's going to have a major play in how we operate in the future. We're embracing 5G technologies, and the ability for zero latency, more IOT, more automation of the supply chain, that sort of thing, I think the future ahead of us is very encouraging, I think it's going to do a lot for national defense, and certainly the security of the country. >> Steve, your final thoughts, space systems are systems, and they're connected to other systems that are connected to people, your thoughts on this digital transformation opportunity. >> Such a great question and such a fun, great challenge ahead of us. Echoing my colleagues sentiments, I would add to it, you know, a lot of this has, I think we should do some focusing on campaigning so that people can feel comfortable to include the Congress to do things a little bit differently. You know, we're not attuned to doing things fast, but the dramatic, you know, the way technology is just going like crazy right now, I think it ties back to, hoping to convince some of our senior leaders and what I call both sides of the Potomac river, that it's worth taking this gamble, we do need to take some of these things you know, in a very proactive way. And I'm very confident and excited and comfortable that this is going to be a great time ahead and all for the better. >> You know, I always think of myself when I talk about DC 'cause I'm not a lawyer and I'm not a political person, but I always say less lawyers, more techies than in Congress and Senate, so (laughter)I always get in trouble when I say that. Sorry, President Armstrong, go ahead. >> Yeah, no, just one other point and Steve's alluded to this and Bong did as well, I mean, we've got to be less risk averse in these partnerships, that doesn't mean reckless, but we have to be less risk averse. And also, as you talk about technology, I have to reflect on something that happened and you both talked a bit about Bill Britton and his impact on Cal Poly and what we're doing. But we were faced a few years ago of replacing traditional data, a data warehouse, data storage, data center and we partnered with AWS and thank goodness, we had that in progress and it enhanced our bandwidth on our campus before COVID hit, and with this partnership with the digital transformation hub, so there's a great example where we had that going. That's not something we could have started, "Oh COVID hit, let's flip that switch." And so we have to be proactive and we also have to not be risk-averse and do some things differently. That has really salvaged the experience for our students right now, as things are flowing well. We only have about 12% of our courses in person, those essential courses and I'm just grateful for those partnerships that I have talked about today. >> And it's a shining example of how being agile, continuous operations, these are themes that expand the space and the next workforce needs to be built. Gentlemen, thank you very much for sharing your insights, I know Bong, you're going to go into the defense side of space in your other sessions. Thank you gentlemen, for your time, for a great session, I appreciate it. >> Thank you. >> Thank you gentlemen. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you, thank you all. I'm John Furey with The Cube here in Palo Alto, California covering and hosting with Cal Poly, the Space and Cybersecurity Symposium 2020, thanks for watching. (bright atmospheric music)
SUMMARY :
the globe, it's The Cube, and of course Steve Jacques on how you see the development and the California National Guard. to you guys over there, Cal Poly and the NSSA have and freedom to operate and nurture the workforce in the crime scene and, you and it's also in the context and the generation before me, So the pipeline needs to be strengthened, does have the same challenges, and likewise on the industry side, and I need you to look at the students and something that we in business and in the public sector. so the students can learn to hack, to the modern version miss the fall if you will, and the industry folks and academia, That's a great point, and echo both the Bong and bringing in kind of the new way, and continue to do over the course but like, there's got to be new ways. and I think that's where, you and that's on the business side, and it's going to be different and certainly the security of the country. and they're connected to other systems and all for the better. of myself when I talk about DC and Steve's alluded to and the next workforce needs to be built. the Space and Cybersecurity
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chuck | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Samson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NSSA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cal Poly | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boeing | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Jacques | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bill Britton | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rachel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NOAA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Armstrong | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Northrop Grumman | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
PG&E | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Chuck Beames | PERSON | 0.99+ |
National Security Space Association | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
National Security Space Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States Space Command | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Department of Defense | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lockheed Martin | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
California National Guard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
United States Space Force | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rachel Sims | PERSON | 0.99+ |
JPL | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steven | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
DOD | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Space X | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jane | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Johnny | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cal Poly | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
National Security Space Association | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Armstrong | PERSON | 0.99+ |
June | DATE | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
U.S. Space Force | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bong | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Elon Musk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Siri | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Lumina Power Panel | CUBE Conversations, June 2020
>> Announcer: From the Cube Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is The Cube Conversation. >> Everyone welcome to this special live stream here in The Cube Studios. I'm John Furrier, your host. We've got a great panel discussion here for one hour, sponsored by Lumina PR, not sponsored but organized by Lumina PR. An authentic conversation around professionals in the news media, and communication professionals, how they can work together. As we know, pitching stories to national media takes place in the backdrop in today's market, which is on full display. The Coronavirus, racial unrest in our country and a lot of new tech challenges from companies, their role in society with their technology and of course, an election all make for important stories to be developed and reported. And we got a great panel here and the purpose is to bridge the two worlds. People trying to get news out for their companies in a way that's relevant and important for audiences. I've got a great panelists here, Gerard Baker Editor at Large with the Wall Street Journal, Eric Savitz, Associate Editor with Barron's and Brenna Goth who's a Southwest Staff Correspondent with Bloomberg Publications. Thanks for joining me today, guys, appreciate it. >> Thank you. >> So we're going to break this down, we got about an hour, we're going to probably do about 40 minutes. I'd love to get your thoughts in this power panel. And you guys are on the front lines decades of experience, seeing these waves of media evolve. And now more than ever, you can't believe what's happening. You're seeing the funding of journalism really challenging at an all time high. You have stories that are super important to audiences and society really changing and we need this more than ever to have more important stories to be told. So this is really a challenge. And so I want to get your thoughts on this first segment. The challenge is around collecting the data, doing the analysis, getting the stories out, prioritizing stories in this time. So I'd love to get your thoughts. We'll start with you, Brenna, what's your thoughts on this as you're out there in Arizona. Coronavirus on the worst is one of the states there. What are your challenges? >> I would say for me, one of the challenges of the past couple months is just the the sheer influx of different types of stories we've had and the amount of news coming out. So I think one of the challenging things is a lot of times we'll get into a bit of a routine covering one story. So early on maybe the Coronavirus, and then something else will come up. So I personally have been covering some of the Coronavirus news here in Arizona and in the Southwest, as well as some of the protests we've seen with the Black Lives Matter movement. And prioritizing that is pretty difficult. And so one thing that I I've been doing is I've noticed that a lot of my routine projects or things I've been working on earlier in the year are off the table, and I'll get back to them when I have time. But for now, I feel like I'm a little bit more on breaking news almost every day in a way that I wasn't before. >> Gerard, I want to get your thoughts on this. Wall Street Journal has been since I could remember when the web hit the scene early on very digital savvy. Reporting, it's obviously, awesome as well. As you have people in sheltering in place, both journalists and the people themselves and the companies, there's an important part of the digital component. How do you see that as an opportunity and a challenge at the same time because you want to get data out there, you want to be collecting and reporting those stories? How do you see that opportunity, given the challenge that people can't meet face to face? >> First of all, thank you very much for having me. I think as we've all discovered in all fields of endeavor in the last three months, it's been quite a revelation, how much we can do without using without access to the traditional office environment. I think one of the things that Coronavirus, this crisis will have done we all agree I think is that it will have fundamentally changed the way people work. There'll be a lot more people quite a bit more working from home. They'll be a lot more remote working. Generally, there'll be a lot less travel. So on the one hand, it's been eye opening. actually how relatively easy, I use that word carefully. But how we've managed, and I think it's true of all news organizations, how we've managed surprisingly well, I think, without actually being at work. At the Wall Street Journal, we have a big office, obviously in midtown Manhattan, as well as dozens of bureaus around the world. Nobody has really been in that office since the middle of March. And yet we've put out a complete Wall Street Journal product, everything from the print edition, obviously, through every aspect of digital media, the website, all of the apps, video, everything, audio, podcasts. We've been able to do pretty well everything that we could do when we were all working in the office. So I think that will be an important lesson and that will clearly induce some change, some long term changes, I think about the way we work. That said, I'd point to two particular challenges that I think we have not properly overcome. Or if you like that we have, the two impediments, that the crisis has produced for us. One is, as you said, the absence of face to face activity, the hive process, which I think is really important. I think that a lot of the best ideas, a lot of the best, the best stories are developed through conversations between people in an office which don't necessarily we can't necessarily replicate through the online experience through this kind of event or through the Zoom meetings that we've all been doing. I think that has inhibited to some extent, some of the more creative activity that we could have done. I think the second larger problem which we all must face with this is that being essentially locked up in our homes for more than three months, which most of us has been I think accentuates a problem that is already that has been a problem in journalism for a long time, which is that journalists tend to cluster in the major metropolitan areas. I think, a couple of years ago, I read a study which said, I think that more than three quarters of journalists work for major news organizations, print, digital TV, radio, whatever, live and work in one of four major metropolises in the US. That's the New York area, the Washington DC area, the San Francisco area and the LA area. And that tends to create a very narrow worldview, unfortunately, because not enough people either come from those areas, but from outside those areas or spend enough time talking to people from outside those areas. And I think the Coronavirus has accentuated that. And I think in terms of coverage, I'm here in New York. I've been in New York continuously for three and a half months now which is quite unusual, I usually travel a lot. And so my reporting, I write columns now, mainly, but obviously I talk to people too. But the reporting, the editing that we're doing here is inevitably influenced by the experience that we've had in New York, which has obviously been, frankly, devastating. New York has been devastated by Coronavirus in a way that no where else in the country has. And I think to some extent, that does, perhaps have undue influence on the coverage. We're all locked up. We're all mindful of our own health. We're all mindful of people that we know who've gone to hospital or have been very, very sick or where we are, we are heavily influenced by our own immediate environment. And I think that has been a problem if we had been, imagine if the journalists in the country, instead of being clustered in New York and LA and San Francisco had been sort of spread over Texas and Missouri and Florida, things like that. I think you'd have a very different overall accounting of this story over the last three months. So I think it's just, it's accentuated that phenomenon in journalism, which I think we're mindful of, and which we all need to do a better job of addressing. >> It's really interesting. And I want to come back to that point around, who you're collaborating with to get this, now we have virtual ground truth, I guess, how you collaborate. But decision making around stories is, you need an open mind. And if you have this, I guess, I'll call it groupthink or clustering is interesting, now we have digital and we have virtual, it opens up the aperture but we still have the groupthink. But I want to get Eric's take first on his work environment, 'cause I know you've lived on both sides of New York and San Francisco area, as well as you've worked out in the field for agencies, as well on the other side, on the storytelling side. How has this current news environment, journalism environment impacted your view and challenges and your opportunities that you're going after the news? >> Well, so there's there's a few elements here. So one, Barron's Of course, covers the world, looks at the world through a financial lens. We cover the stock market every day. The stock market is not the center of story, but it is an important element of what's been unfolding over the last few months and the markets have been incredibly volatile, we change the way that we approach the markets. Because everything, the big stories are macro stories, huge swings in stock prices, huge swings in the price of oil, dramatic moves in almost every financial security that you can imagine. And so there's a little bit of a struggle for us as we try and shift our daily coverage to be a little more focused on the macro stories as we're still trying to tell what's happening with individual stocks and companies, but these bigger stories have changed our approach. So even if you look at say the covers of our magazine over the last few months, typically, we would do a cover on a company or an investor, that sort of thing. And now they're all big, thematic stories, because the world has changed. And world is changing how it looks at the financial markets. I think one thing that that Gerard touched on is the inability to really leave your house. I'm sitting in my little home office here, where I've been working since March, and my inability to get out and talk to people in person to have some, some interface with the companies and people that I cover, makes it tougher. You get story ideas from those interactions. I think Gerard said some of it comes from your interactions with your colleagues. But some of that also just comes from your ability to interact with sources and that is really tougher to do. It's more formalistic if you do it online. It's just not the same to be on a Zoom call as to be sitting in a Starbucks with somebody and talking about what's going on. I think the other elements of this is that there's, we have a lot of attempts, trying new things trying to reach our readers. We'll do video sessions, we'll do all sorts of other things. And it's one more layer on top of everything else is that there's a lot of demands on the time for the people who are working in journalism right now. I would say one other thing I'll touch on, John, which is, you mentioned, I did use, I worked for public communications for a while, and I do feel their pain because the ability to do any normal PR pitching for new products, new services, the kinds of things that PR people do every day is really tough. It's just really hard to get anybody's attention for those things right now. And the world is focused on these very large problems. >> Well, we'll unpack the PR comms opportunities in the next section. But I want to to just come back to this topic teased out from Gerard and Brenna when you guys were getting out as well. This virtual ground truth, ultimately, at the end of the day, you got to get the stories, you got to report them, they got to be distributed. Obviously, the Wall Street Journal is operating well, by the way, I love the Q&A video chats and what they got going on over there. So the format's are evolving and doing a good job, people are running their business. But as journalists and reporters out there, you got to get the truth and the ground truth comes from interaction. So as you have an aperture with digital, there's also groupthink on, say, Twitter and these channels. So getting in touch with the audience to have those stories. How are you collecting the data? How are you reporting? Has anything changed or shifted that you can point to because ultimately, it's virtual. You still got to get the ground truth, you still got to get the stories. Any thoughts on this point? >> I think in a way what we're seeing is in writ large actually is a problem again, another problem that I think digital journalism or the digital product digital content, if you like, actually presents for us today, which is that it's often said, I think rightly, that one of the, as successful as a lot of digital journalism has been and thank you for what you said about the Wall Street Journal. And we have done a tremendous job and by the way, one of the things that's been a striking feature of this crisis has been the rapid growth in subscriptions that we've had at the Journal. I know other news organizations have too. But we've benefited particularly from a hunger for the quality news. And we've put on an enormous number subscriptions in the last three months. So we've been very fortunate in that respect. But one of the challenges that people always say, one of the one of the drawbacks that people always draw attention to about digital content is that there's a lack of, for want of a better words, serendipity about the experience. When you used to read a newspaper, print newspapers, when may be some of us are old enough to remember, we'd get a newspaper, we'd open it up, we'd look at the front page, we look inside, we'd look at what other sections they were. And we would find things, very large number of things that we weren't particularly, we weren't looking for, we weren't expecting to, we're looking for a story about such. With the digital experience, as we know, that's a much it's a much less serendipitous experience. So you tend to a lot of search, you're looking, you find things that you tend to be looking for, and you find fewer things that, you follow particular people on social media that you have a particular interest in, you follow particular topics and have RSS feeds or whatever else you're doing. And you follow things that, you tend to find things that you were looking for. You don't find many things you weren't. What I think that the virus, the being locked up at home, again, has had a similar effect. That we, again, some of the best stories that I think anybody comes across in life, but news organizations are able to do are those stories that you know that you come across when you might have been looking for something else. You might have been working on a story about a particular company with a particular view to doing one thing and you came across somebody else. And he or she may have told you something actually really quite different and quite interesting and it took you in a different direction. That is easier to do when you're talking to people face to face, when you're actually there, when you're calling, when you're tasked with looking at a topic in the realm. When you are again, sitting at home with your phone on your computer, you tend to be more narrowly so you tend to sort of operate in lanes. And I think that we haven't had the breadth probably of journalism that I think you would get. So that's a very important you talk about data. The data that we have is obviously, we've got access broadly to the same data that we would have, the same electronically delivered data that we would have if we'd been sitting in our office. The data that I think in some ways is more interesting is the non electronically delivered data that is again, the casual conversation, the observation that you might get from being in a particular place or being with someone. The stimuli that arise from being physically in a place that you just aren't getting. And I think that is an important driver of a lot of stories. And we're missing that. >> Well, Gerard, I just want to ask real quick before I go to Brenna on her her take on this. You mentioned the serendipity and taking the stories in certain directions from the interactions. But also there's trust involved. As you build that relationship, there's trust between the parties, and that takes you down that road. How do you develop trust as you are online now? Is there a methodology or technique? Because you want to get the stories out fast, it's a speed game. But there's also the development side of it where a trust equation needs to build. What's your thoughts on that piece? Because that's where the real deeper stories come from. >> So I wasn't sure if you're asking me or Gerard. >> Gerard if he wants can answer that is the trust piece. >> I'll let the others speak to that too. Yeah, it is probably harder to... Again, most probably most people, most stories, most investigative stories, most scoops, most exclusives tend to come from people you already trust, right? So you've developed a trust with them, and they've developed a trust with you. Perhaps more importantly, they know you're going to treat the story fairly and properly. And that tends to develop over time. And I don't think that's been particularly impaired by this process. You don't need to have a physical proximity with someone in order to be able to develop that trust. My sources, I generally speak to them on the phone 99% of the time anyway, and you can still do that from home. So I don't think that's quite... Obviously, again, there are many more benefits from being able to actually physically interact with someone. But I think the level of, trust takes a long time to develop, let's be honest, too, as well. And I think you develop that trust both by developing good sources. and again, as I said, with the sources understanding that you're going to do the story well. >> Brenna, speed game is out there, you got to get stories fast. How do you balance speed and getting the stories and doing some digging into it? What's your thoughts on all this? >> I would say, every week is looking different for me these days. A lot of times there are government announcements coming out, or there are numbers coming out or something that really does require a really quick story. And so what I've been trying to do is get those stories out as quick as possible with maybe sources I already have, or really just the facts on the ground I can get quickly. And then I think in these days, too, there is a ton of room for following up on things. And some news event will come out but it sparks another idea. And that's the time to that when I'm hearing from PR people or I'm hearing from people who care about the issue, right after that first event is really useful for me to hear who else is thinking about these things and maybe ways I can go beyond the first story for something that more in depth and adds more context and provides more value to our readers. >> Awesome. Well, guys, great commentary and insight there on the current situation. The next section is with the role of PR, because it's changing. I've heard the term earned media is a term that's been kicked around. Now we're all virtual, and we're all connected. The media is all virtual. It's all earned at this point. And that's not just a journalistic thing, there's storytelling. There's new voices emerging. You got these newsletter services, audiences are moving very quickly around trying to figure out what's real. So comms folks are trying to get out there and do their job and tell a story. And sometimes that story doesn't meet the cadence of say, news and/or reporting. So let's talk about that. Eric, you brought this up. You have been on both sides. You said you feel for the folks out there who are trying to do their job. How is the job changing? And what can they do now? >> The news cycle is so ferocious at the moment that it's very difficult to insert your weigh in on something that doesn't touch on the virus or the economy or social unrest or the volatility of the financial markets. So I think there's certain kinds of things that are probably best saved for another moment in time, If you're trying to launch new products or trying to announce new services, or those things are just tougher to do right now. I think that the most interesting questions right now are, If I'm a comms person, how can I make myself and my clients a resource to media who are trying to tell stories about these things, do it in a timely way, not overreach, not try insert myself into a story that really isn't a good fit? Now, every time one of these things happen, we got inboxes full of pitches for things that are only tangentially relevant and are probably not really that helpful, either to the reporter generally or to the client of the firm that is trying to pitch an idea. But I will say on the on this at the same time that I rely on my connections to people in corporate comms every single day to make connections with companies that I cover and need to talk to. And it's a moment when almost more than ever, I need immediacy of response, accurate information access to the right people at the companies who I'm trying to cover. But it does mean you need to be I think sharper or a little more pointed a little more your thinking about why am I pitching this person this story? Because the there's no time to waste. We are working 24 hours a day is what it feels like. You don't want to be wasting people's time. >> Well, you guys you guys represent big brands in media which is phenomenal. And anyone would love to have their company mentioned obviously, in a good way, that's their goal. But the word media relations means you relate to the media. If there's no media to relate to, the roles change, and there's not enough seats at the table, so to speak. So getting a clip on in the clip book that gets sent to management, look, "We're on Bloomberg." "Great, check." But is at it? So people, this is a department that needs to do more. Is there things that they can do, that isn't just chasing, getting on your franchises stories? Because it obviously would be great if we were all on Barron's Wall Street Journal, and Bloomberg, but they can't always get that. They still got to do more. They got to develop the relationships. >> John, one thing I would be conscious of here is that many of our publications, it's certainly true for journalists, true for us at Barron's and it's certainly true for Bloomberg. We're all multimedia publishers. We're doing lots of things. Barron's has television show on Fox. We have a video series. We have podcasts and newsletters, and daily live audio chats and all sorts of other stuff in addition to the magazine and the website. And so part of that is trying to figure out not just the right publication, but maybe there's an opportunity to do a very particular, maybe you'd be great fit for this thing, but not that thing. And having a real understanding of what are the moving parts. And then the other part, which is always the hardest part, in a way, is truly understanding not just I want to pitch to Bloomberg, but who do I want to pitch at Bloomberg. So I might have a great story for the Wall Street Journal and maybe Gerard would care but maybe it's really somebody you heard on the street who cares or somebody who's covering a particular company. So you have to navigate that, I think effectively. And even, more so now, because we're not sitting in a newsroom. I can't go yell over to somebody who's a few desks away and suggest they take a look at something. >> Do you think that the comm-- (talk over each other) Do you think the comms teams are savvy and literate in multimedia? Are they still stuck in the print ways or the group swing is they're used to what they're doing and haven't evolved? Is that something that you're seeing here? >> I think it varies. Some people will really get it. I think one of the things that that this comes back to in a sense is it's relationship driven. To Gerard's point, it's not so much about trusting people that I don't know, it's about I've been at this a long time, I know what people I know, who I trust, and they know the things I'm interested in and so that relationship is really important. It's a lot harder to try that with somebody new. And the other thing is, I think relevant here is something that we touched on earlier, which is the idiosyncratic element. The ability for me to go out and see new things is tougher. In the technology business, you could spend half your time just going to events, You could go to the conferences and trade shows and dinners and lunches and coffees all day long. And you would get a lot of good story ideas that way. And now you can't do any of that. >> There's no digital hallway. There are out there. It's called Twitter, I guess or-- >> Well, you're doing it from sitting in this very I'm still doing it from sitting in the same chair, having conversations, in some ways like that. But it's not nearly the same. >> Gerard, Brenna, what do you guys think about the comms opportunity, challenges, either whether it's directly or indirectly, things that they could do differently? Share your thoughts. Gerard, we'll start with you? >> Well, I would echo Eric's point as far as knowing who you're pitching to. And I would say that in, at least for the people I'm working with, some of our beats have changed because there are new issues to cover. Someone's taking more of a role covering virus coverage, someone's taking more of a role covering protests. And so I think knowing instead of casting a really wide net, I'm normally happy to try to direct pitches in the right direction. But I do have less time to do that now. So I think if someone can come to me and say, "I know you've been covering this, "this is how my content fits in with that." It'd grab my attention more and makes it easier for me. So I would say that that is one thing that as beats are shifting and people are taking on a little bit of new roles in our coverage, that that's something PR and marketing teams could definitely keep an eye on. >> I agree with all of that. And all everything everybody said. I'd say two very quick things. One, exactly as everybody said, really know who you are pitching to. It's partly just, it's going to be much more effective if you're pitching to the right person, the right story. But when I say that also make the extra effort to familiarize yourself with the work that that reporter or that editor has done. You cannot, I'm sorry to say, overestimate the vanity of reporters or editors or anybody. And so if you're pitching a story to a particular reporter, in a field, make sure you're familiar with what that person may have done and say to her, "I really thought you did a great job "on the reporting that you did on this." Or, "I read your really interesting piece about that," or "I listened to your podcast." It's a relatively easy thing to do that yields extraordinarily well. A, because it appeals to anybody's fantasy and we all have a little bit of that. But, B, it also suggests to the reporter or the editor or the person involved the PR person communications person pitching them, really knows this, has really done their work and has really actually takes this seriously. And instead of just calling, the number of emails I get, and I'm sure it's the same for the others too, or occasional calls out of the blue or LinkedIn messages. >> I love your work. I love your work. >> (voice cuts out) was technology. Well, I have a technology story for you. It's absolutely valueless. So that's the first thing, I would really emphasize that. The second thing I'd say is, especially on the specific relation to this crisis, this Coronavirus issue is it's a tricky balance to get right. On the one hand, make sure that what you're doing what you're pitching is not completely irrelevant right now. The last three months has not been a very good time to pitch a story about going out with a bunch of people to a crowded restaurant or whatever or something like that to do something. Clearly, we know that. At the same time, don't go to the other extreme and try and make every little thing you have seen every story you may have every product or service or idea that you're pitching don't make it the thing that suddenly is really important because of Coronavirus. I've seen too many of those too. People trying too hard to say, "In this time of crisis, "in this challenging time, what people really want to hear "about is "I don't know, "some new diaper "baby's diaper product that I'm developing or whatever." That's trying too hard. So there is something in the middle, which is, don't pitch the obviously irrelevant story that is just not going to get any attention through this process. >> So you're saying don't-- >> And at the same time, don't go too far in the other direction. And essentially, underestimate the reporter's intelligence 'cause that reporter can tell you, "I can see that you're trying too hard." >> So no shotgun approach, obviously, "Hey, I love your work." Okay, yeah. And then be sensitive to what you're working on not try to force an angle on you, if you're doing a story. Eric, I want to get your thoughts on the evolution of some of the prominent journalists that I've known and/or communication professionals that are taking roles in the big companies to be storytellers, or editors of large companies. I interviewed Andy Cunningham last year, who used to be With Cunningham Communications, and formerly of Apple, better in the tech space and NPR. She said, "Companies have to own their own story "and tell it and put it out there." I've seen journalists say on Facebook, "I'm working on a story of x." And then crowdsource a little inbound. Thoughts on this new role of corporations telling their own story, going direct to the consumers. >> I think to a certain extent, that's valuable. And in some ways, it's a little overrated. There are a lot of companies creating content on their websites, or they're creating their own podcasts or they're creating their own newsletter and those kinds of things. I'm not quite sure how much of that, what the consumption level is for some of those things. I think, to me, the more valuable element of telling your story is less about the form and function and it's more about being able to really tell people, explain to them why what they do matters and to whom it matters, understanding the audience that's going to want to hear your story. There are, to your point, there are quite a few journalists who have migrated to either corporate communications or being in house storytellers of one kind or another for large businesses. And there's certainly a need to figure out the right way to tell your story. I think in a funny way, this is a tougher moment for those things. Because the world is being driven by external events, by these huge global forces are what we're all focused on right now. And it makes it a lot tougher to try and steer your own story at this particular moment in time. And I think you do see it Gerard was talking about don't try and... You want to know what other people are doing. You do want to be aware of what others are writing about. But there's this tendency to want to say, "I saw you wrote a story about Peloton "and we too have a exercise story that you can, "something that's similar." >> (chuckles) A story similar to it. We have a dance video or something. People are trying to glam on to things and taking a few steps too far. But in terms of your original question, it's just tougher at the moment to control your story in that particular fashion, I think. >> Well, this brings up a good point. I want to get to Gerard's take on this because the Wall Street Journal obviously has been around for many, many decades. and it's institution in journalism. In the old days, if you weren't relevant enough to make the news, if you weren't the most important story that people cared about, the editors make that choice and you're on the front page or in a story editorially. And companies would say, "No, but I should be in there." And you'd say, "That's what advertising is for." And that's the way it seemed to work in the past. If you weren't relevant in the spirit of the decision making of important story or it needs to be communicated to the audience, there's ads for that. You can get a full page ad in the old days. Now with the new world, what's an ad, what's a story? You now have multiple omni-channels out there. So traditionally, you want to get the best, most important story that's about relevance. So companies might not have a relevant story and they're telling a boring story. There's no there, there, or they miss the story. How do you see this? 'Cause this is the blend, this is the gray area that I see. It's certainly a good story, depending on who you're talking to, the 10 people who like it. >> I think there's no question. We're in the news business, topicality matters. You're going to have a much better chance of getting your story, getting your product or service, whatever covered by the Wall Street Journal, Barron's or anywhere else for that matter, if it seems somehow news related, whether it's the virus or the unrest that we've been seeing, or it's to do with the economy. Clearly, you can have an effect. Newspapers, news organizations of all the three news organizations we represent don't just, are not just obviously completely obsessed with what happened this morning and what's going on right now. We are all digging into deeper stories, especially in the business field. Part of what we all do is actually try to get beyond the daily headlines. And so what's happening with the fortunes of a particular company. Obviously, they may be impacted by they're going to be impacted by the lockdown and Coronavirus. But they actually were doing some interesting things that they were developing over the long term, and we would like to look into that too. So again, there is a balance there. And I'm not going to pretend that if you have a really topical story about some new medical device or some new technology for dealing with this new world that we're all operating in, you're probably going to get more attention than you would if you don't have that. But I wouldn't also underestimate, the other thing is, as well as topicality, everybody's looking at the same time to be different, and every journalist wants to do something original and exclusive. And so they are looking for a good story that may be completely unrelated. In fact, I would also underestimate, I wouldn't underestimate either the desire of readers and viewers and listeners to actually have some deeper reported stories on subjects that are not directly in the news right now. So again, it's about striking the balance right. But I wouldn't say that, that there is not at all, I wouldn't say there is not a strong role for interesting stories that may not have anything to do what's going on with the news right now. >> Brenna, you want to add on your thoughts, you're in the front lines as well, Bloomberg, everyone wants to be on Bloomberg. There's Bloomberg radio. You guys got tons of media too, there's tons of stuff to do. How do they navigate? And how do you view the interactions with comms folks? >> It looks we're having a little bit of challenge with... Eric, your thoughts on comm professionals. The questions in the chats are everything's so fast paced, do you think it's less likely for reporters to respond to PR comms people who don't have interacted with you before? Or with people you haven't met before? >> It's an internal problem. I've seen data that talks about the ratio of comms people to reporters, and it's, I don't know, six or seven to one or something like that, and there are days when it feels like it's 70 to one. And so it is challenging to break through. And I think it's particularly challenging now because some of the tools you might have had, you might have said, "Can we grab coffee one day or something like that," trying to find ways to get in front of that person when you don't need them. It's a relationship business. I know this is a frustrating answer, but I think it's the right answer which is those relationships between media and comms people are most successful when they've been established over time. And so you're not getting... The spray and pray strategy doesn't really work. It's about, "Eric, I have a story that's perfect for you. "And here's why I think you you should talk to this guy." And if they really know me, there's a reasonable chance that I'll not only listen to them, but I'll at least take the call. You need to have that high degree of targeting. It is really hard to break through and people try everything. They try, the insincere version of the, "I read your story, it was great. "but here's another great story." Which maybe they read your story, maybe they didn't at least it was an attempt. Or, "if you like this company, you'll love that one." People try all these tricks to try and get get to you. I think the highest level of highest probability of success comes from the more information you have about not just what I covered yesterday, but what do I cover over time? What kinds of stories am I writing? What kinds of stories does the publication write? And also to keep the pitching tight, I was big believer when I was doing comms, you should be able to pitch stories in two sentences. And you'll know from that whether there's going to be connection or not, don't send me five or more pitches. Time is of the essence, keep it short and as targeted as possible. >> That's a good answer to Paul Bernardo's question in the chat, which is how do you do the pitch. Brenna, you're back. Can you hear us? No. Okay. We'll get back to her when she gets logged back in. Gerard, your thoughts on how to reach you. I've never met you before, if I'm a CEO or I'm a comms person, a company never heard of, how do I get your attention? If I can't have a coffee with you with COVID, how do I connect with you virtually? (talk over each other) >> Exactly as Eric said, it is about targeting, it's really about making sure you are. And again, it's, I hate to say this, but it's not that hard. If you are the comms person for a large or medium sized company or even a small company, and you've got a particular pitch you want to make, you're probably dealing in a particular field, a particular sector, business sector or whatever. Let's say it says not technology for change, let's say it's fast moving consumer goods or something like that. Bloomberg, Brenna is in an enormous organization with a huge number of journalist you deal and a great deal of specialism and quality with all kinds of sectors. The Wall Street Journal is a very large organization, we have 13, 1400 reporters, 13 to 1400 hundred journalist and staff, I should say. Barron's is a very large organization with especially a particularly strong field coverage, especially in certain sectors of business and finance. It's not that hard to find out A, who is the right person, actually the right person in those organizations who's been dealing with the story that you're trying to sell. Secondly, it's absolutely not hard to find out what they have written or broadcast or produced on in that general field in the course of the last, and again, as Eric says, going back not just over the last week or two, but over the last year or two, you can get a sense of their specialism and understand them. It's really not that hard. It's the work of an hour to go back and see who the right person is and to find out what they've done. And then to tailor the pitch that you're making to that person. And again, I say that partly, it's not purely about the vanity of the reporter, it's that the reporter will just be much more favorably inclined to deal with someone who clearly knows, frankly, not just what they're pitching, but what the journalist is doing and what he or she, in his or her daily activity is actually doing. Target it as narrowly as you can. And again, I would just echo what Eric and I think what Brenna was also saying earlier too that I'm really genuinely surprised at how many very broad pitches, again, I'm not directly in a relative role now. But I was the editor in chief of the Journal for almost six years. And even in that position, the number of extraordinarily broad pitches I get from people who clearly didn't really know who I was, who didn't know what I did, and in some cases, didn't even really know what Wall Street Journal was. If you can find that, if you actually believe that. It's not hard. It's not that hard to do that. And you will have so much more success, if you are identifying the organization, the people, the types of stories that they're interested in, it really is not that difficult to do. >> Okay, I really appreciate, first of all, great insight there. I want to get some questions from the crowd so if you're going to chat, there was a little bit of a chat hiccup in there. So it should be fixed. We're going to go to the chat for some questions for this distinguished panel. Talk about the new coffee. There's a good question here. Have you noticed news fatigue, or reader seeking out news other than COVID? If so, what news stories have you been seeing trending? In other words, are people sick and tired of COVID? Or is it still on the front pages? Is that relevant? And if not COVID, what stories are important, do you think? >> Well, I could take a brief stab at that. I think it's not just COVID per se, for us, the volatility of the stock market, the uncertainties in the current economic environment, the impact on on joblessness, these massive shifts of perceptions on urban lifestyles. There's a million elements of this that go beyond the core, what's happening with the virus story. I do think as a whole, all those things, and then you combine that with the social unrest and Black Lives Matter. And then on top of that, the pending election in the fall. There's just not a lot of room left for other stuff. And I think I would look at it a little bit differently. It's not finding stories that don't talk on those things, it's finding ways for coverage of other things whether it's entertainment. Obviously, there's a huge impact on the entertainment business. There's a huge impact on sports. There's obviously a huge impact on travel and retail and restaurants and even things like religious life and schooling. I have the done parents of a college, was about to be a college sophomore, prays every day that she can go back to school in the fall. There are lots of elements to this. And it's pretty hard to imagine I would say to Gerard's point earlier, people are looking for good stories, they're always looking for good stories on any, but trying to find topics that don't touch on any of these big trends, there's not a lot of reasons to look for those. >> I agree. Let me just give you an example. I think Eric's exactly right. It's hard to break through. I'll just give you an example, when you asked that question, I just went straight to my Wall Street Journal app on my phone. And of course, like every organization, you can look at stories by sections and by interest and by topic and by popularity. And what are the three most popular stories right now on the Wall Street Journal app? I can tell you the first one is how exactly do you catch COVID-19? I think that's been around since for about a month. The second story is cases accelerate across the United States. And the third story is New York, New Jersey and Connecticut, tell travelers from areas with virus rates to self isolate. So look, I think anecdotally, there is a sense of COVID fatigue. Well, we're all slightly tired of it. And certainly, we were probably all getting tired, or rather distressed by those terrible cases and when we've seen them really accelerate back in March and April and these awful stories of people getting sick and dying. I was COVID fatigued. But I just have to say all of the evidence we have from our data, in terms of as I said earlier, the interest in the story, the demand for what we're doing, the growth in subscriptions that we've had, and just as I said, little things like that, that I can point you at any one time, I can guarantee you that our among our top 10 most read stories, at least half of them will be COVID-19. >> I think it's safe to say general interest in that outcome of progression of that is super critical. And I think this brings up the tech angle, which we can get into a minute. But just stick with some of these questions I just want to just keep these questions flowing while we have a couple more minutes left here. In these very challenging times for journalism, do byline articles have more power to grab the editors attention in the pitching process? >> Well, I think I assume what the questioner is asking when he said byline articles is contributed. >> Yes. >> Contributed content. Barron's doesn't run a lot of contributing content that way in a very limited way. When I worked at Forbes, we used to run tons of it. I'm not a big believer that that's necessarily a great way to generate a lot of attention. You might get published in some publication, if you can get yourself onto the op ed page of The Wall Street Journal or The New York Times, more power to you. But I think in most cases-- >> It's the exception not the rule Exception not the rule so to speak, on the big one. >> Yeah. >> Well, this brings up the whole point about certainly on SiliconANGLE, our property, where I'm co founder and chief, we basically debate over and get so many pitches, "hey, I want to write for you, here's a contributed article." And it's essentially an advertisement. Come on, really, it's not really relevant. In some case we (talk over each other) analysts come in and and done that. But this brings up the question, we're seeing these newsletters like sub stack and these services really are funding direct journalism. So it's an interesting. if you're good enough to write Gerard, what's your take on this, you've seen this, you have a bit of experience in this. >> I think, fundamental problem here is that is people like the idea of doing by lines or contributed content, but often don't have enough to say. You can't just do, turn your marketing brochure into a piece of an 800 word with the content that that's going to be compelling or really attract any attention. I think there's a place for it, if you truly have something important to say, and if you really have something new to say, and it's not thinly disguised marketing material. Yeah, you can find a way to do that. I'm not sure I would over-rotate on that as an approach. >> No, I just briefly, again, I completely agree. At the Journal we just don't ever publish those pieces. As Eric says, you're always, everyone is always welcome to try and pitch to the op ed pages of the Journal. They're not generally going to I don't answer for them, I don't make those decisions. But I've never seen a marketing pitch run as an op ed effectively. I just think you have to know again, who you're aiming at. I'm sure it's true for Bloomberg, Barron's and the Journal, most other major news organizations are not really going to consider that. There might be organizations, there might be magazines, digital and print magazines. There might be certain trade publications that would consider that. Again, at the Journal and I'm sure most of the large news organizations, we have very strict rules about what we can publish. And how and who can get published. And it's essentially journal editorials, that journal news staff who can publish stories we don't really take byline, outside contribution. >> Given that your time is so valuable, guys, what's the biggest, best practice to get your attention? Eric, you mentioned keeping things tight and crisp. Are there certain techniques to get your attention? >> Well I'll mention just a couple of quick things. Email is better than most other channels, despite the volume. Patience is required as a result because of the volume. People do try and crawl over the transom, hit you up on LinkedIn, DM you on Twitter, there's a lot of things that people try and do. I think a very tightly crafted, highly personalized email with the right subject line is probably still the most effective way, unless it's somebody you actually, there are people who know me who know they have the right to pick up the phone and call me if they really think they have... That's a relationship that's built over time. The one thing on this I would add which I think came up a little bit before thinking about it is, you have to engage in retail PR, not not wholesale PR. The idea that you're going to spam a list of 100 people and think that that's really going to be a successful approach, it's not unless you're just making an announcement, and if you're issuing your earnings release, or you've announced a large acquisition or those things, fine, then I need to get the information. But simply sending around a very wide list is not a good strategy, in most cases, I would say probably for anyone. >> We got Brenna back, can you hear me? She's back, okay. >> I can hear you, I'm back. >> Well, let's go back to you, we missed you. Thanks for coming back in. We had a glitch on our end but appreciate it, bandwidth internet is for... Virtual is always a challenge to do live, but thank you. The trend we're just going through is how do I pitch to you? What's the best practice? How do I get your attention? Do bylines lines work? Actually, Bloomberg doesn't do that very often either as well as like the Journal. but your thoughts on folks out there who are really trying to figure out how to do a good job, how to get your attention, how to augment your role and responsibilities. What's your thoughts? >> I would say, going back to what we said a little bit before about really knowing who you're pitching to. If you know something that I've written recently that you can reference, that gets my attention. But I would also encourage people to try to think about different ways that they can be part of a story if they are looking to be mentioned in one of our articles. And what I mean by that is, maybe you are launching new products or you have a new initiative, but think about other ways that your companies relate to what's going on right now. So for instance, one thing that I'm really interested in is just the the changing nature of work in the office place itself. So maybe you know of something that's going on at a company, unlimited vacation for the first time or sabbaticals are being offered to working parents who have nowhere to send their children, or something that's unique about the current moment that we're living in. And I think that those make really good interviews. So it might not be us featuring your product or featuring exactly what your company does, but it still makes you part of the conversation. And I think it's still, it's probably valuable to the company as well to get that mention, and people may be looking into what you guys do. So I would say that something else we are really interested in right now is really looking at who we're quoting and the diversity of our sources. So that's something else I would put a plug in for PR people to be keeping an eye on, is if you're always putting up your same CEO who is maybe of a certain demographic, but you have other people in your company who you can give the opportunity to talk with the media. I'm really interested in making sure I'm using a diverse list of sources and I'm not just always calling the same person. So if you can identify people who maybe even aren't experienced with it, but they're willing to give it a try, I think that now's a really good moment to be able to get new voices in there. >> Rather than the speed dial person you go to for that vertical or that story, building out those sources. >> Exactly. >> Great, that's great insight, Everyone, great insights. And thank you for your time on this awesome panel. Love to do it again. This has been super informative. I love some of the engagement out there. And again, I think we can do more of these and get the word out. I'd like to end the panel on an uplifting note for young aspiring journalists coming out of school. Honestly, journalism programs are evolving. The landscape is changing. We're seeing a sea change. As younger generation comes out of college and master's programs in journalism, we need to tell the most important stories. Could you each take a minute to give your advice to folks either going in and coming out of school, what to be prepared for, how they can make an impact? Brenna, we'll start with you, Gerard and Eric. >> That's a big question. I would say one thing that has been been encouraging about everything going on right now as I have seen an increased hunger for information and an increased hunger for accurate information. So I do think it can obviously be disheartening to look at the furloughs and the layoffs and everything that is going on around the country. But at the same time, I think we have been able to see really big impacts from the people that are doing reporting on protests and police brutality and on responses to the virus. And so I think for young journalists, definitely take a look at the people who are doing work that you think is making a difference. And be inspired by that to keep pushing even though the market might be a little bit difficult for a while. >> I'd say two things. One, again, echoing what Brenna said, identify people that you follow or you admire or you think are making a real contribution in the field and maybe directly interact with them. I think all of us, whoever we are, always like to hear from young journalists and budding journalists. And again, similar advice to giving to the advice that we were giving about PR pitches. If you know what that person has been doing, and then contact them and follow them. And I know I've been contacted by a number of young journalists like that. The other thing I'd say is and this is more of a plea than a piece of advice. But I do think it will work in the long run, be prepared to go against the grain. I fear that too much journalism today is of the same piece. There is not a lot of intellectual diversity in what we're seeing There's a tendency to follow the herd. Goes back a little bit to what I was saying right at the opening about the fact that too many journalists, quite frankly, are clustered in the major metropolitan areas in this country and around the world. Have something distinctive and a bit different to say. I'm not suggesting you offer some crazy theory or a set of observations about the world but be prepared to... To me, the reason I went into journalism was because I was always a bit skeptical about whenever I saw something in any media, which especially one which seemed to have a huge amount of support and was repeated in all places, I always asked myself, "Is that really true? "Is that actually right? "Maybe there's an alternative to that." And that's going to make you stand out as a journalist, that's going to give you a distinctiveness. It's quite hard to do in some respects right now, because standing out from the crowd can get you into trouble. And I'm not suggesting that people should do that. Have a record of original storytelling, of reporting, of doing things perhaps that not, because look, candidly, there are probably right now in this country, 100,00 budding putative journalists who would like to go out and write about, report on Black Lives Matter and the reports on the problems of racial inequality in this country and the protests and all of that kind of stuff. The problem there is there are already 100,000 of those people who want to do that in addition to probably the 100,000 journalists who are already doing it. Find something else, find something different. have something distinctive to offer so that when attention moves on from these big stories, whether it's COVID or race or politics or the election or Donald Trump or whatever. Have something else to offer that is quite distinctive and where you have actually managed to carve out for yourself a real record as having an independent voice. >> Brenna and Gerard, great insight. Eric, take us home close us out. >> Sure. I'd say a couple things. So one is as a new, as a young journalist, I think first of all, having a variety of tools in your toolkit is super valuable. So be able to write long and write short, be able to do audio, blogs, podcast, video. If you can shoot photos and the more skills that you have, a following on social media. You want to have all of the tools in your toolkit because it is challenging to get a job and so you want to be able to be flexible enough to fill all those roles. And the truth is that a modern journalist is finding the need to do all of that. When I first started at Barron's many, many years ago, we did one thing, we did a weekly magazine. You'd have two weeks to write a story. It was very comfortable. And that's just not the way the world works anymore. So that's one element. And the other thing, I think Gerard is right. You really want to have a certain expertise if possible that makes you stand out. And the contradiction is, but you also want to have the flexibility to do lots of different stories. You want to get (voice cuts out) hold. But if you have some expertise, that is hard to find, that's really valuable. When Barron's hires we're always looking for people who have, can write well but also really understand the financial markets. And it can be challenging for us sometimes to find those people. And so I think there's, you need to go short and long. It's a barbell strategy. Have expertise, but also be flexible in both your approach and the things you're willing to cover. >> Great insight. Folks, thanks for the great commentary, great chats for the folks watching, really appreciate your valuable time. Be original, go against the grain, be skeptical, and just do a good job. I think there's a lot of opportunity. And I think the world's changing. Thanks for your time. And I hope the comms folks enjoyed the conversation. Thank you for joining us, everyone. Appreciate it. >> Thanks for having us. >> Thank you. >> I'm John Furrier here in the Cube for this Cube Talk was one hour power panel. Awesome conversation. Stay in chat if you want to ask more questions. We'll come back and look at those chats later. But thank you for watching. Have a nice day. (instrumental music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world, and the purpose is to So I'd love to get your thoughts. and the amount of news coming out. and a challenge at the same time And I think to some extent, that does, in the field for agencies, is the inability to and the ground truth the observation that you might get and that takes you down that road. So I wasn't sure if answer that is the trust piece. 99% of the time anyway, and you and getting the stories And that's the time to that How is the job changing? Because the there's no time to waste. at the table, so to speak. on the street who cares And the other thing is, There are out there. But it's not nearly the same. about the comms opportunity, challenges, But I do have less time to do that now. "on the reporting that you did on this." I love your work. like that to do something. And at the same time, in the big companies to be storytellers, And I think you do see it moment to control your story In the old days, if you weren't relevant And I'm not going to pretend And how do you view the The questions in the chats are Time is of the essence, keep it short in the chat, which is It's not that hard to do that. Or is it still on the front pages? I have the done parents of a college, But I just have to say all of the evidence And I think this brings up the tech angle, I assume what the questioner is asking onto the op ed page Exception not the rule so the whole point about that that's going to be compelling I just think you have to know practice to get your attention? and think that that's really going to be We got Brenna back, can you hear me? how to get your attention, and the diversity of our sources. Rather than the speed I love some of the engagement out there. And be inspired by that to keep pushing And that's going to make you Brenna and Gerard, great insight. is finding the need to do all of that. And I hope the comms folks I'm John Furrier here in the Cube
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brenna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gerard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Savitz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Arizona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Cunningham | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bloomberg Publications | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Texas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
LA | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third story | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
13 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
June 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Gerard Baker | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Bernardo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brenna Goth | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Missouri | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Connecticut | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
70 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bloomberg | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
April | DATE | 0.99+ |
Washington DC | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
COVID-19 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
second story | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Wall Street Journal | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fox | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lumina PR | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New Jersey | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Donald Trump | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Barron | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: Emerging Tech sees Notable Decline post Covid-19
>> Announcer: From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE conversation. >> As you may recall, coming into the second part of 2019 we reported, based on ETR Survey data, that there was a narrowing of spending on emerging tech and an unplugging of a lot of legacy systems. This was really because people were going from experimentation into operationalizing their digital initiatives. When COVID hit, conventional wisdom suggested that there would be a flight to safety. Now, interestingly, we reported with Eric Bradley, based on one of the Venns, that a lot of CIOs were still experimenting with emerging vendors. But this was very anecdotal. Today, we have more data, fresh data, from the ETR Emerging Technology Study on private companies, which really does suggest that there's a notable decline in experimentation, and that's affecting emerging technology vendors. Hi, everybody, this is Dave Vellante, and welcome to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights, powered by ETR. Once again, Sagar Kadakia is joining us. Sagar is the Director of Research at ETR. Sagar, good to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Good to see you again. Thanks for having me, Dave. >> So, it's really important to point out, this Emerging Tech Study that you guys do, it's different from your quarterly Technology Spending Intention Survey. Take us through the methodology. Guys, maybe you could bring up the first chart. And, Sagar, walk us through how you guys approach this. >> No problem. So, a lot of the viewers are used to seeing a lot of the results from the Technology Spending Intention Survey, or the TSIS, as we call it. That study, as the title says, it really tracks spending intentions on more pervasive vendors, right, Microsoft, AWS, as an example. What we're going to look at today is our Emerging Technology Study, which we conduct biannually, in May and November. This study is a little bit different. We ask CIOs around evaluations, awareness, planned evaluations, so think of this as pre-spend, right. So that's a major differentiator from the TSIS. That, and this study, really focuses on private emerging providers. We're really only focused on those really emerging private companies, say, like your Series B to Series G or H, whatever it may be, so, two big differences within those studies. And then today what we're really going to look at is the results from the Emerging Technology Study. Just a couple of quick things here. We had 811 CIOs participate, which represents about 380 billion in annual IT spend, so the results from this study matter. We had almost 75 Fortune 100s take it. So, again, we're really measuring how private emerging providers are doing in the largest organizations. And so today we're going to be reviewing notable sectors, but largely this survey tracks roughly 356 private technologies and frameworks. >> All right, guys, bring up the pie chart, the next slide. Now, Sagar, this is sort of a snapshot here, and it basically says that 44% of CIOs agree that COVID has decreased the organization's evaluation and utilization of emerging tech, despite what I mentioned, Eric Bradley's Venn, which suggested one CIO in particular said, "Hey, I always pick somebody in the lower left "of the magic quadrant." But, again, this is a static view. I know we have some other data, but take us through this, and how this compares to other surveys that you've done. >> No problem. So let's start with the high level takeaways. And I'll actually kind of get into to the point that Eric was debating, 'cause that point is true. It's just really how you kind of slice and dice the data to get to that. So, what you're looking at here, and what the overall takeaway from the Emerging Technology Study was, is, you know, you are going to see notable declines in POCs, of proof-of-concepts, any valuations because of COVID-19. Even though we had been communicating for quite some time, you know, the last few months, that there's increasing pressure for companies to further digitize with COVID-19, there are IT budget constraints. There is a huge pivot in IT resources towards supporting remote employees, a decrease in risk tolerance, and so that's why what you're seeing here is a rather notable number of CIOs, 44%, that said that they are decreasing their organization's evaluation and utilization of private emerging providers. So that is notable. >> Now, as you pointed out, you guys run this survey a couple of times a year. So now let's look at the time series. Guys, if you bring up the next chart. We can see how the sentiment has changed since last year. And, of course, we're isolating here on some of larger companies. So, take us through what this data means. >> No problem. So, how do we quantify what we just saw in the prior slide? We saw 44% of CIOs indicating that they are going to be decreasing their evaluations. But what exactly does that mean? We can pretty much determine that by looking at a lot of the data that we captured through our Emerging Technology Study. There's a lot going on in this slide, but I'll walk you through it. What you're looking at here is Fortune 1000 organizations, so we've really isolated the data to those organizations that matter. So, let's start with the teal, kind of green line first, because I think it's a little bit easier to understand. What you're looking at, Fortune 1000 evaluations, both planned and current, okay? And you're looking at a time series, one year ago and six months ago. So, two of the answer options that we provide CIOs in this survey, right, think about the survey as a grid, where you have seven answer options going horizontally, and then 300-plus vendors and technologies going vertically. For any given vendor, they can essentially indicate one of these options, two of them being on currently evaluating them or I plan to evaluate them in six months. So what you're looking at here is effectively the aggregate number, or the average number of Fortune 1000 evaluations. So if you look into May 2019, all the way on the left of that chart, that 24% roughly means that a quarter of selections made by Fortune 1000 of the survey, they selected plan to evaluate or currently evaluating. If you fast-forward six months, to the middle of the chart, November '19, it's roughly the same, one in four technologies that are Fortune 1000 selected, they indicated that I plan or am currently evaluating them. But now look at that big drop off going into May 2020, the 17%, right? So now one out of every six technologies, or one out of every selections that they made was an evaluation. So a very notable drop. And then if you look at the blue line, this is another answer option that we provided CIOs: I'm aware of the technology but I have no plans to evaluate. So this answer option essentially tracks awareness levels. If you look at the last six months, look at that big uptick from 44% to over 50%, right? So now, essentially one out of every two technologies, or private technologies that a CIO is aware of, they have no plans to evaluate. So this is going to have an impact on the general landscape, when we think about those private emerging providers. But there is one caveat, and, Dave, this is what you mentioned earlier, this is what Eric was talking about. The providers that are doing well are the ones that are work-from-home aligned. And so, just like a few years ago, we were really analyzing results based on are you cloud-native or are you Cloud-aligned, because those technologies are going to do the best, what we're seeing in the emerging space is now the same thing. Those emerging providers that enable organizations to maintain productivity for their employees, essentially allowing their employees to work remotely, those emerging providers are still doing well. And that is probably the second biggest takeaway from this study. >> So now what we're seeing here is this flight to perceive safety, which, to your point, Sagar, doesn't necessarily mean good news for all enterprise tech vendors, but certainly for those that are positioned for the work-from-home pivot. So now let's take a look at a couple of sectors. We'll start with information security. We've reported for years about how the perimeter's been broken down, and that more spend was going to shift from inside the moat to a distributed network, and that's clearly what's happened as a result of COVID. Guys, if you bring up the next chart. Sagar, you take us through this. >> No problem. And as you imagine, I think that the big theme here is zero trust. So, a couple of things here. And let me just explain this chart a little bit, because we're going to be going through a couple of these. What you're seeing on the X-axis here, is this is effectively what we're classifying as near term growth opportunity from all customers. The way we measure that effectively is we look at all the evaluations, current evaluations, planned evaluations, we look at people who are evaluated and plan to utilize these vendors. The more indications you get on that the more to the top right you're going to be. The more indications you get around I'm aware of but I don't plan to evaluate, or I'm replacing this early-stage vendor, the further down and on the left you're going to be. So, on the X-axis you have near term growth opportunity from all customers, and on the Y-axis you have near term growth opportunity from, really, the biggest shops in the world, your Global 2000, your Forbes Private 225, like Cargill, as an example, and then, of course, your federal agencies. So you really want to be positioned up and to the right here. So, the big takeaway here is zero trust. So, just a couple of things on this slide when we think about zero trust. As organizations accelerate their Cloud and Saas spend because of COVID-19, and, you know, what we were talking about earlier, Dave, remote work becomes the new normal, that perimeter security approach is losing appeal, because the perimeter's less defined, right? Apps and data are increasingly being stored in the Cloud. That, and employees are working remotely from everywhere, and they're accessing all of these items. And so what we're seeing now is a big move into zero trust. So, if we look at that chart again, what you're going to see in that upper right quadrant are a lot of identity and access management players. And look at the bifurcation in general. This is what we were talking about earlier in terms of the landscape not doing well. Most security vendors are in that red area, you know, in the middle to the bottom. But if you look at the top right, what are you seeing here? Unify ID, Auth0, WSO2, right, all identity and access management players. These are critical in your zero trust approach, and this is one of the few area where we are seeing upticks. You also see here BitSight, Lucideus. So that's going to be security assessment. You're seeing VECTRA and Netskope and Darktrace, and a few others here. And Cloud Security and IDPS, Intrusion Detection and Prevention System. So, very few sectors are seeing an uptick, very few security sectors actually look pretty good, based on opportunities that are coming. But, essentially, all of them are in that work-from-home aligned security stack, so to speak. >> Right, and of course, as we know, as we've been reporting, buyers have options, from both established companies and these emerging companies that are public, Okta, CrowdStrike, Zscaler. We've seen the work-from-home pivot benefit those guys, but even Palo Alto Networks, even CISCO, I asked (other speaker drowns out speech) last week, I said, "Hey, what about this pivot to work from home? "What about this zero trust?" And he said, "Look, the reality is, yes, "a big part of our portfolio is exposed "to that traditional infrastructure, "but we have options for zero trust as well." So, from a buyer's standpoint, that perceived flight to safety, you have a lot of established vendors, and that clearly is showing up in your data. Now, the other sector that we want to talk about is database. We've been reporting a lot on database, data warehouse. So, why don't you take us through the next graphic here, if you would. >> Sagar: No problem. So, our theme here is that Snowflake is really separating itself from the pack, and, again, you can see that here. Private database and data warehousing vendors really continue to impact a lot of their public peers, and Snowflake is leading the way. We expect Snowflake to gain momentum in the next few years. And, look, there's some rumors that IPOing soon. And so when we think about that set-up, we like it, because as organizations transition away from hybrid Cloud architectures to 100% or near-100% public Cloud, Snowflake is really going to benefit. So they look good, their data stacks look pretty good, right, that's resiliency, redundancy across data centers. So we kind of like them as well. Redis Labs bring a DB and they look pretty good here on the opportunity side, but we are seeing a little bit of churn, so I think probably Snowflake and DataStax are probably our two favorites here. And again, when you think about Snowflake, we continue to think more pervasive vendors, like Paradata and Cloudera, and some of the other larger database firms, they're going to continue seeing wallet and market share losses due to some of these emerging providers. >> Yeah. If you could just keep that slide up for a second, I would point out, in many ways Snowflake is kind of a safer bet, you know, we talk about flight to safety, because they're well-funded, they're established. You can go from zero to Snowflake very quickly, that's sort of their mantra, if you will. But I want to point out and recognize that it is somewhat oranges and tangerines here, Snowflake being an analytical database. You take MariaDB, for instance, I look at that, anyway, as relational and operational. And then you mentioned DataStax. I would say Couchbase, Redis Labs, Aerospike. Cockroach is really a... EValue Store. You've got some non-relational databases in there. But we're looking at the entire sector of databases, which has become a really interesting market. But again, some of those established players are going to do very well, and I would put Snowflake on that cusp. As you pointed out, Bloomberg broke the story, I think last week, that they were contemplating an IPO, which we've known for a while. >> Yeah. And just one last thing on that. We do like some of the more pervasive players, right. Obviously, AWS, all their products, Redshift and DynamoDB. Microsoft looks really good. It's just really some of the other legacy ones, like the Teradatas, the Oracles, the Hadoops, right, that we are going to be impacted. And so the claw providers look really good. >> So, the last decade has really brought forth this whole notion of DevOps, infrastructure as code, the whole API economy. And that's the piece we want to jump into now. And there are some real stand-outs here, you know, despite the early data that we showed you, where CIOs are less prone to look at emerging vendors. There are some, for instance, if you bring up the next chart, guys, like Hashi, that really are standing out, aren't they? >> That's right, Dave. So, again, what you're seeing here is you're seeing that bifurcation that we were talking about earlier. There are a lot of infrastructure software vendors that are not positioned well, but if you look at the ones at the top right that are positioned well... We have two kind of things on here, starting with infrastructure automation. We think a winner here is emerging with Terraform. Look all the way up to the right, how well-positioned they are, how many opportunities they're getting. And for the second straight survey now, Terraform is leading along their peers, Chef, Puppet, SaltStack. And they're leading their peers in so many different categories, notably on allocating more spend, which is obviously very important. For Chef, Puppet and SaltStack, which you can see a little bit below, probably a little bit higher than the middle, we are seeing some elevator churn levels. And so, really, Terraform looks like they're kind of separating themselves. And we've got this great quote from the CIO just a few months ago, on why Terraform is likely pulling away, and I'll read it out here quickly. "The Terraform tool creates "an entire infrastructure in a box. "Unlike vendors that use procedural languages, "like Ants, Bull and Chef, "it will show you the infrastructure "in the way you want it to be. "You don't have to worry about "the things that happen underneath." I know some companies where you can put your entire Amazon infrastructure through Terraform. If Amazon disappears, if your availability drops, load balancers, RDS, everything, you just run Terraform and everything will be created in 10 to 15 minutes. So that shows you the power of Terraform and why we think it's ranked better than some of the other vendors. >> Yeah, I think that really does sum it up. And, actually, guys, if you don't mind bringing that chart back up again. So, a point out, so, Mitchell Hashimoto, Hashi, really, I believe I'm correct, talking to Stu about this a little bit, he sort of led the Terraform project, which is an Open Source project, and, to your point, very easy to deploy. Chef, Puppet, Salt, they were largely disrupted by Cloud, because they're designed to automate deployment largely on-prem and DevOps, and now Terraform sort of packages everything up into a platform. So, Hashi actually makes money, and you'll see it on this slide, and things, Vault, which is kind of their security play. You see GitLab on here. That's really application tooling to deploy code. You see Docker containers, you know, Docker, really all about open source, and they've had great adoption, Docker's challenge has always been monetization. You see Turbonomic on here, which is application resource management. You can't go too deep on these things, but it's pretty deep within this sector. But we are comparing different types of companies, but just to give you a sense as to where the momentum is. All right, let's wrap here. So maybe some final thoughts, Sagar, on the Emerging Technology Study, and then what we can expect in the coming month here, on the update in the Technology Spending Intention Study, please. >> Yeah, no problem. One last thing on the zero trust side that has been a big issue that we didn't get to cover, is VPN spend. Our data is pointing that, yes, even though VPN spend did increase the last few months because of remote work, we actually think that people are going to move away from that as they move onto zero trust. So just one last point on that, just in terms of overall thoughts, you know, again, as we cover it, you can see how bifurcated all these spaces are. Really, if we were to go sector by sector by sector, right, storage and block chain and MLAI and all that stuff, you would see there's a few or maybe one or two vendors doing well, and the majority of vendors are not seeing as many opportunities. And so, again, are you work-from-home aligned? Are you the best vendor of all the other emerging providers? And if you fit those two criteria then you will continue seeing POCs and evaluations. And if you don't fit that criteria, unfortunately, you're going to see less opportunities. So think that's really the big takeaway on that. And then, just in terms of next steps, we're already transitioning now to our next Technology Spending Intention Survey. That launched last week. And so, again, we're going to start getting a feel for how CIOs are spending in 2H-20, right, so, for the back half of the year. And our question changes a little bit. We ask them, "How do you plan on spending in the back half year "versus how you actually spent "in the first half of the year, or 1H-20?" So, we're kind of, tighten the screw, so to speak, and really getting an idea of what's spend going to look like in the back half, and we're also going to get some updates as it relates to budget impacts from COVID-19, as well as how vendor-relationships have changed, as well as business impacts, like layoffs and furloughs, and all that stuff. So we have a tremendous amount of data that's going to be coming in the next few weeks, and it should really prepare us for what to see over the summer and into the fall. >> Yeah, very excited, Sagar, to see that. I just wanted to double down on what you said about changes in networking. We've reported with you guys on NPLS networks, shifting to SD-WAN. But even VPN and SD-WAN are being called into question as the internet becomes the new private network. And so lots of changes there. And again, very excited to see updated data, return of post-COVID, as we exit this isolation economy. Really want to point out to folks that this is not a snapshot survey, right? This is an ongoing exercise that ETR runs, and grateful for our partnership with you guys. Check out ETR.plus, that's the ETR website. I publish weekly on Wikibon.com and SiliconANGLE.com. Sagar, thanks so much for coming on. Once again, great to have you. >> Thank you so much, for having me, Dave. I really appreciate it, as always. >> And thank you for watching this episode of theCube Insights, powered by ETR. This Dave Vellante. We'll see you next time. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world, Sagar is the Director of Research at ETR. Good to see you again. So, it's really important to point out, So, a lot of the viewers that COVID has decreased the of slice and dice the data So now let's look at the time series. by looking at a lot of the data is this flight to perceive safety, and on the Y-axis you have Now, the other sector that we and Snowflake is leading the way. And then you mentioned DataStax. And so the claw providers And that's the piece we "in the way you want it to be. but just to give you a sense and the majority of vendors are not seeing on what you said about Thank you so much, for having me, Dave. And thank you for watching this episode
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Sagar | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
May 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
CISCO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
May 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Eric Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Terraform | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mitchell Hashimoto | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
44% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ETR | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
November '19 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
24% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
17% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Redis Labs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Couchbase | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aerospike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
COVID-19 | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Paradata | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
811 CIOs | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hashi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one caveat | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
November | DATE | 0.99+ |
two criteria | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Series G | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
X-axis | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bloomberg | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cloudera | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
DataStax | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two kind | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
15 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Sagar Kadakia | PERSON | 0.98+ |
about 380 billion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Oracles | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one year ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
MariaDB | TITLE | 0.98+ |
over 50% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two vendors | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Series B | OTHER | 0.98+ |
first chart | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Making Artifical Intelligance Real With Dell & VMware
>>artificial intelligence. The words are full of possibility. Yet to many it may seem complex, expensive and hard to know where to get started. How do you make AI really for your business? At Dell Technologies, we see AI enhancing business, enriching lives and improving the world. Dell Technologies is dedicated to making AI easy, so more people can use it to make a real difference. So you can adopt and run AI anywhere with your current skill. Sets with AI Solutions powered by power edge servers and made portable across hybrid multi clouds with VM ware. Plus solved I O bottlenecks with breakthrough performance delivered by Dell EMC Ready solutions for HPC storage and Data Accelerator. And enjoy automated, effortless management with open manage systems management so you can keep business insights flowing across a multi cloud environment. With an AI portfolio that spans from workstations to supercomputers, Dell Technologies can help you get started with AI easily and grow seamlessly. AI has the potential to profoundly change our lives with Dell Technologies. AI is easy to adopt, easy to manage and easy to scale. And there's nothing artificial about that. Yeah, yeah, from >>the Cube Studios in Palo Alto and Boston >>connecting with >>thought leaders all around the world. This is a cube conversation. Hi, I'm Stew Minimum. And welcome to this special launch with our friends at Dell Technologies. We're gonna be talking about AI and the reality of making artificial intelligence real happy to welcome to the program. Two of our Cube alumni Rob, depending 90. He's the senior vice president of server product management and very Pellegrino vice president, data centric workloads and solutions in high performance computing, both with Dell Technologies. Thank you both for joining thanks to you. So you know, is the industry we watch? You know, the AI has been this huge buzz word, but one of things I've actually liked about one of the differences about what I see when I listen to the vendor community talking about AI versus what I saw too much in the big data world is you know, it used to be, you know Oh, there was the opportunity. And data is so important. Yes, that's really But it was. It was a very wonky conversation. And the promise and the translation of what has been to the real world didn't necessarily always connect and We saw many of the big data solutions, you know, failed over time with AI on. And I've seen this in meetings from Dell talking about, you know, the business outcomes in general overall in i t. But you know how ai is helping make things real. So maybe we can start there for another product announcements and things we're gonna get into. But Robbie Interior talk to us a little bit about you know, the customers that you've been seeing in the impact that AI is having on their business. >>Sure, Teoh, I'll take us a job in it. A couple of things. For example, if you start looking at, uh, you know, the autonomous vehicles industry of the manufacturing industry where people are building better tools for anything they need to do on their manufacturing both. For example, uh, this is a good example of where that honors makers and stuff you've got Xeon ut It's actually a world war balcony. Now it is using our whole product suite right from the hardware and software to do multiple iterations off, ensuring that the software and the hardware come together pretty seamlessly and more importantly, ingesting, you know, probably tens of petabytes of data to ensure that we've got the right. They're training and gardens in place. So that's a great example of how we are helping some of our customers today in ensuring that we can really meet is really in terms of moving away from just a morning scenario in something that customers are able to use like today. >>Well, if I can have one more, Ah Yanai, one of our core and more partners than just customers in Italy in the energy sector have been been really, really driving innovation with us. We just deployed a pretty large 8000 accelerator cluster with them, which is the largest commercial cluster in the world. And where they're focusing on is the digital transformation and the development of energy sources. And it's really important not be an age. You know, the plan. It's not getting younger, and we have to be really careful about the type of energies that we utilize to do what we do every day on they put a lot of innovation. We've helped set up the right solution for them, and we'll talk some more about what they've done with that cluster. Later, during our chat, but it is one of the example that is tangible with the appointment that is being used to help there. >>Great. Well, we love starting with some of the customer stories. Really glad we're gonna be able to share some of those, you know, actual here from some of the customers a little bit later in this launch. But, Robbie, you know, maybe give us a little bit as to what you're hearing from customers. You know, the overall climate in AI. You know, obviously you know, so many challenges facing, you know, people today. But you know, specifically around ai, what are some of the hurdles that they might need to overcome Be able to make ai. Really? >>I think the two important pieces I can choose to number one as much as we talk about AI machine learning. One of the biggest challenges that customers have today is ensuring that they have the right amount and the right quality of data to go out and do the analytics percent. Because if you don't do it, it's giggle garbage in garbage out. So the one of the biggest challenges our customers have today is ensuring that they have the most pristine data to go back on, and that takes quite a bit of an effort. Number two. A lot of times, I think one of the challenges they also have is having the right skill set to go out and have the execution phase of the AI pod. You know, work done. And I think those are the two big challenges we hear off. And that doesn't seem to be changing in the very near term, given the very fact that nothing Forbes recently had an article that said that less than 15% off, our customers probably are using AI machine learning today so that talks to the challenges and the opportunities ahead for me. All right, >>So, Ravi, give us the news. Tell us the updates from Dell Technologies how you're helping customers with AI today, >>going back to one of the challenges, as I mentioned, which is not having the right skin set. One of the things we are doing at Dell Technologies is making sure that we provide them not just the product but also the ready solutions that we're working with. For example, Tier and his team. We're also working on validated and things are called reference architectures. The whole idea behind this is we want to take the guesswork out for our customers and actually go ahead and destroying things that we have already tested to ensure that the integration is right. There's rightsizing attributes, so they know exactly the kind of a product that would pick up our not worry about me in time and the resources needed you get to that particular location. So those are probably the two of the biggest things we're doing to help our customers make the right decision and execute seamlessly and on time. >>Excellent. So teary, maybe give us a little bit of a broader look as to, you know, Dell's part participation in the overall ecosystem when it comes to what's happening in AI on and you know why is this a unique time for what's happening in the in the industry? >>Yeah, I mean, I think we all live it. I mean, I'm right here in my home, and I'm trying to ensure that the business continues to operate, and it's important to make sure that we're also there for our customers, right? The fight against covered 19 is eyes changing what's happening around the quarantines, etcetera. So Dell, as a participant not only in the AI the world that we live in on enabling AI is also a participant in all of the community's s. So we've recently joined the covered 19 High Performance Computing Consortium on. We also made a lot of resources available to researchers and scientists leveraging AI in order to make progress towards you're and potentially the vaccine against Corbyn. 19 examples are we have our own supercomputers in the lab here in Austin, Texas, and we've given access to some of our partners. T. Gen. Is one example. The beginning of our chat I mentioned and I So not only did they have barely deport the cluster with us earlier this year that could 19 started hitting, so they've done what's the right thing to do for community and humanity is they made the resource available to scientists in Europe on tack just down the road here, which had the largest I can't make supercomputer that we deployed with them to. Ai's doing exactly the same thing. So this is one of the real examples that are very timely, and it's it's it's happening right now we hadn't planned for it. A booth there with our customers, the other pieces. This is probably going to be a trend, but healthcare is going through and version of data you mentioned in the beginning. You're talking about 2.3000 exabytes, about 3000 times the content of the Library of Congress. It's incredible, and that data is useless. I mean, it's great we can We can put that on our great ice on storage, but you can also see it as an opportunity to get business value out of it. That's going to be we're a lot more resource is with AI so a lot happening here. That's that's really if I can get into more of the science of it because it's healthcare, because it's the industry we see now that our family members at the M. Ware, part of the Dell Technologies Portfolio, are getting even more relevance in the discussion. The industry is based on virtualization, and the M ware is the number one virtualization solution for the industry. So now we're trying to weave in the reality in the I T environment with the new nodes of AI and data science and HPC. So you will see the VM Ware just added kubernetes control plane. This fear Andi were leveraging that to have a very flexible environment On one side, we can do some data science on the other side. We can go back to running some enterprise class hardware class software on top of it. So this is is great. And we're capitalizing on it with validates solutions, validated design on. And I think that's going to be adding a lot of ah power in the hands of our customers and always based on their feedback. And they asked back, >>Yeah, I may ask you just to build on that interesting comment that you made on we're actually looking at very shortly will be talking about how we're gonna have the ability to, for example, read or V Sphere and Allah servers begin. That essentially means that we're going to cut down the time our customers need to go ahead and deploy on their sites. >>Yeah, excellent. Definitely been, you know, very strong feedback from the community. We did videos around some of the B sphere seven launch, you know, theory. You know, we actually had done an interview with you. Ah, while back at your big lab, Jeff Frick. Otto, See the supercomputers behind what you were doing. Maybe bring us in a little bit inside as who? You know, some of the new pieces that help enable AI. You know, it often gets lost on the industry. You know, it's like, Oh, yeah, well, we've got the best hardware to accelerate or enable these kind of workloads. So, you know, bring us in its But what, You know, the engineering solution sets that are helping toe make this a reality >>of today. Yeah, and truly still you've been there. You've seen the engineers in the lab, and that's more than AI being real. That that is double real because we spend a lot of time analyzing workloads customer needs. We have a lot of PhD engineers in there, and what we're working on right now is kind of the next wave of HPC enablement Azaz. We all know the consumption model or the way that we want to have access to resources is evolving from something that is directly in front of us. 1 to 1 ratio to when virtualization became more prevalent. We had a one to many ratio on genes historically have been allocated on a per user. Or sometimes it is study modified view to have more than one user GP. But with the addition of big confusion to the VM our portfolio and be treated not being part of these fear. We're building up a GPU as a service solutions through a VM ware validated design that we are launching, and that's gonna give them flexibility. And the key here is flexibility. We have the ability, as you know, with the VM Ware environment, to bring in also some security, some flexibility through moving the workloads. And let's be honest with some ties into cloud models on, we have our own set of partners. We all know that the big players in the industry to But that's all about flexibility and giving our customers what they need and what they expect in the world. But really, >>Yeah, Ravi, I guess that brings us to ah, you know, one of the key pieces we need to look at here is how do we manage across all of these environments? Uh, and you know, how does AI fit into this whole discussion between what Dell and VM ware doing things like v Sphere, you know, put pulling in new workloads >>stew, actually a couple of things. So there's really nothing artificial about the real intelligence that comes through with all that foolish intelligence we're working out. And so one of the crucial things I think we need to, you know, ensure that we talk about is it's not just about the fact that it's a problem. So here are our stories there, but I think the crucial thing is we're looking at it from an end to end perspective from everything from ensuring that we have direct workstations, right servers, the storage, making sure that is well protected and all the way to working with an ecosystem of software renders. So first and foremost, that's the whole integration piece, making sure they realized people system. But more importantly, it's also ensuring that we help our customers by taking the guess work out again. I can't emphasize the fact that there are customers who are looking at different aliens off entry, for example, somebody will be looking at an F G. A. Everybody looking at GP use. API is probably, as you know, are great because they're price points and normal. Or should I say that our needs our lot lesser than the GP use? But on the flip side, there's a need for them to have a set of folks who can actually program right. It is why it's called the no programming programmable gate arrays of Saas fee programmable. My point being in all this, it's important that we actually provide dried end to end perspective, making sure that we're able to show the integration, show the value and also provide the options, because it's really not a cookie cutter approach of where you can take a particular solution and think that it will put the needs of every single customer. He doesn't even happen in the same industry, for that matter. So the flexibility that we provide all the way to the services is truly our attempt. At Dell Technologies, you get the entire gamut of solutions available for the customer to go out and pick and choose what says their needs the best. >>Alright, well, Ravi interior Thank you so much for the update. So we're gonna turn it over to actually hear from some of your customers. Talk about the power of ai. You're from their viewpoint, how real these solutions are becoming. Love the plan words there about, you know, enabling really artificial intelligence. Thanks so much for joining after the customers looking forward to the VM Ware discussion, we want to >>put robots into the world's dullest, deadliest and dirtiest jobs. We think that if we can have machines doing the work that put people at risk than we can allow people to do better work. Dell Technologies is the foundation for a lot of the >>work that we've done here. Every single piece of software that we developed is simulated dozens >>or hundreds of thousands of times. And having reliable compute infrastructure is critical for this. Yeah, yeah, A lot of technology has >>matured to actually do something really useful that can be used by non >>experts. We try to predict one system fails. We try to predict the >>business impatience things into images. On the end of the day, it's that >>now we have machines that learn how to speak a language from from zero. Yeah, everything >>we do really, at Epsilon centered around data and our ability >>to get the right message to >>the right person at the right >>time. We apply machine learning and artificial intelligence. So in real time you can adjust those campaigns to ensure that you're getting the most optimized message theme. >>It is a joint venture between Well, cars on the Amir are your progress is automated driving on Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Centre is really based on safety on how we can actually make lives better for you. Typically gets warned on distracted in cars. If you can take those kind of situations away, it will bring the accidents down about 70 to 80%. So what I appreciate it with Dell Technologies is the overall solution that they have to live in being able to deliver the full package. That has been a major differentiator compared to your competitors. >>Yeah. Yeah, alright, welcome back to help us dig into this discussion and happy to welcome to the program Chris Facade. He is the senior vice president and general manager of the B sphere business and just Simon, chief technologist for the High performance computing group, both of them with VM ware. Gentlemen, thanks so much for joining. Thank >>you for having us. >>All right, Krish. When vm Ware made the bit fusion acquisition. Everybody was looking the You know what this will do for space Force? GPU is we're talking about things like AI and ML. So bring us up to speed. As to you know, the news today is the what being worth doing with fusion. Yeah. >>Today we have a big announcement. I'm excited to announce that, you know, we're taking the next big step in the AI ML and more than application strategy. With the launch off bit fusion, we're just now being fully integrated with VCF. They're in black home, and we'll be releasing this very shortly to the market. As you said when we acquire institution A year ago, we had a showcase that's capable days as part of the animal event. And at that time we laid out a strategy that part of our institution as the cornerstone off our capabilities in the black home in the Iot space. Since then, we have had many customers take a look at the technology and we have had feedback from them as well as from partners and analysts. And the feedback has been tremendous. >>Excellent. Well, Chris, what does this then mean for customers? You know What's the value proposition that diffusion brings the VC? Yeah, >>if you look at our customers, they are in the midst of a big ah journey in digital transformation. And basically, what that means is customers are building a ton of applications and most of those applications some kind of data analytics or machine learning embedded in it. And what this is doing is that in the harbor and infrastructure industry, this is driving a lot of innovation. So you see the advent off a lot off specialized? Absolutely. There's custom a six FPs. And of course, the views being used to accelerate the special algorithms that these AI ml type applications need. And unfortunately, customer environment. Most of these specialized accelerators uh um bare metal kind of set up, but they're not taking advantage off optimization and everything that it brings to that. Also, with fusion launched today, we are essentially doing the accelerator space. What we need to compute several years ago and that is essentially bringing organization to the accelerators. But we take it one step further, which is, you know, we use the customers the ability to pull these accelerators and essentially going to be couple it from the server so you can have a pool of these accelerators sitting in the network. And customers are able to then target their workloads and share the accelerators get better utilization by a lot of past improvements and, in essence, have a smaller pool that they can use for a whole bunch of different applications across the enterprise. That is a huge angle for our customers. And that's the tremendous positive feedback that we get getting both from customers as well. >>Excellent. Well, I'm glad we've got Josh here to dig into some of the thesis before we get to you. They got Chris. Uh, part of this announcement is the partnership of VM Ware in Dell. So tell us about what the partnership is in the solutions for for this long. Yeah. >>We have been working with the Dell in the in the AI and ML space for a long time. We have ah, good partnership there. This just takes the partnership to the next level and we will have ah, execution solution. Support in some of the key. I am el targeted words like the sea for 1 40 the r 7 40 Those are the centers that would be partnering with them on and providing solutions. >>Excellent. Eso John. You know, we've watched for a long time. You know, various technologies. Oh, it's not a fit for virtualized environment. And then, you know, VM Ware does does what it does. Make sure you know, performance is there. And make sure all the options there bring us inside a little bit. You know what this solution means for leveraging GPS? Yeah. So actually, before I before us, answer that question. Let me say that the the fusion acquisition and the diffusion technology fits into a larger strategy at VM Ware around AI and ML. That I think matches pretty nicely the overall Dell strategy as well, in the sense that we are really focused on delivering AI ml capabilities or the ability for our customers to run their am ai and ml workloads from edge before the cloud. And that means running it on CPU or running it on hardware accelerators like like G fuse. Whatever is really required by the customer in this specific case, we're quite excited about using technology as it really allows us. As Chris was describing to extend our capabilities especially in the deep learning space where GPU accelerators are critically important. And so what this technology really brings to the table is the ability to, as Chris was outlining, to pull those resources those hardware resource together and then allow organizations to drive up the utilization of those GP Resource is through that pooling and also increase the degree of sharing that we support that supported for the customer. Okay, Jeff, take us in a little bit further as how you know the mechanisms of diffusion work. Sure, Yeah, that's a great question. So think of it this way. There there is a client component that we're using a server component. The server component is running on a machine that actually has the physical GPU is installed in it. The client machine, which is running the bit fusion client software, is where the user of the data scientist is actually running their machine machine learning application. But there's no GPU actually in that host. And what is happening with fusion technology is that it is essentially intercepting the cuda calls that are being made by that machine learning app, patience and promoting those protocols over to the bit fusion server and then injecting them into the local GPU on the server. So it's actually, you know, we call it into a position in the ability that remote these protocols, but it's actually much more sophisticated than that. There are a lot of underlying capabilities that are being deployed in terms of optimization who takes maximum advantage of the the networking link that sits between the client machine and the server machine. But given all of that, once we've done it with diffusion, it's now possible for the data scientist. Either consume multiple GP use for single GPU use or even fractional defuse across that Internet using the using technology. Okay, maybe it would help illustrate some of these technologies. If you got a couple of customers, Sure, so one example would be a retail customer. I'm thinking of who is. Actually it's ah, grocery chain. That is the flowing, ah, large number of video cameras into their to their stores in order to do things like, um, watch for pilfering, uh, identify when storage store shelves could be restocked and even looking for cases where, for example, maybe a customer has fallen down in denial on someone needs to go and help those multiple video streams and then multiple app patients that are being run that part are consuming the data from those video streams and doing analytics and ml on them would be perfectly suited for this type of environment where you would like to be ableto have these multiple independent applications running but having them be able to efficiently share the hardware resources of the GP use. Another example would be retailers who are deploying ml Howard Check out registers who helped reduce fraud customers who are buying, buying things with, uh, fake barcodes, for example. So in that case, you would not necessarily want to employ a single dedicated GPU for every single check out line. Instead, what you would prefer to do is have a full set of resource. Is that each inference operation that's occurring within each one of those check out lines could then consume collectively. That would be two examples of the use of this kind of pull in technology. Okay, great. So, Josh, a lot last question for you is this technology is this only for use and anything else. You can give us a little bit of a look forward to as to what we should be expecting from the big fusion technology. Yeah. So currently, the target is specifically NVIDIA GPU use with Cuda. The team, actually even prior to acquisition, had done some work on enablement of PJs and also had done some work on open CL, which is more open standard for a device that so what you will see over time is an expansion of the diffusion capabilities to embrace devices like PJs. The domain specific a six that first was referring to earlier will roll out over time. But we are starting with the NVIDIA GPU, which totally makes sense, since that is the primary hardware acceleration and for deep learning currently excellent. Well, John and Chris, thank you so much for the updates to the audience. If you're watching this live, please throwing the crowd chat and ask your questions. This faith, If you're watching this on demand, you can also go to crowdchat dot net slash make ai really to be able to see the conversation that we had. Thanks so much for joining. >>Thank you very much. >>Thank you. Managing your data center requires around the clock. Attention Dell, EMC open manage mobile enables I t administrators to monitor data center issues and respond rapidly toe unexpected events anytime, anywhere. Open Manage Mobile provides a wealth of features within a comprehensive user interface, including >>server configuration, push notifications, remote desktop augmented reality and more. The latest release features an updated Our interface Power and Thermal Policy Review. Emergency Power Reduction, an internal storage monitoring download Open Manage Mobile today.
SUMMARY :
the potential to profoundly change our lives with Dell Technologies. much in the big data world is you know, it used to be, you know Oh, there was the opportunity. product suite right from the hardware and software to do multiple iterations be really careful about the type of energies that we utilize to do what we do every day on You know, the overall climate in AI. is having the right skill set to go out and have the execution So, Ravi, give us the news. One of the things we are doing at Dell Technologies is making So teary, maybe give us a little bit of a broader look as to, you know, more of the science of it because it's healthcare, because it's the industry we see Yeah, I may ask you just to build on that interesting comment that you made on we're around some of the B sphere seven launch, you know, theory. We all know that the big players in the industry to But that's all about flexibility and so one of the crucial things I think we need to, you know, ensure that we talk about forward to the VM Ware discussion, we the foundation for a lot of the Every single piece of software that we developed is simulated dozens And having reliable compute infrastructure is critical for this. We try to predict one system fails. On the end of the day, now we have machines that learn how to speak a language from from So in real time you can adjust solution that they have to live in being able to deliver the full package. chief technologist for the High performance computing group, both of them with VM ware. As to you know, the news today And at that time we laid out a strategy that part of our institution as the cornerstone that diffusion brings the VC? and essentially going to be couple it from the server so you can have a pool So tell us about what the partnership is in the solutions for for this long. This just takes the partnership to the next the degree of sharing that we support that supported for the customer. to monitor data center issues and respond rapidly toe unexpected events anytime, Power and Thermal Policy Review.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Josh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Library of Congress | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Robbie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Italy | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ravi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Facade | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VM Ware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Krish | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NVIDIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
dozens | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
less than 15% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tens of petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
90 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Andi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
19 examples | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Austin, Texas | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Epsilon | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two important pieces | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two big challenges | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Forbes | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Simon | PERSON | 0.98+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 3000 times | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
M. Ware | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
more than one user | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
1 40 | OTHER | 0.97+ |
8000 accelerator | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
several years ago | DATE | 0.96+ |
Advanced Driver Assistance Systems Centre | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
A year ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
six FPs | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Steve Canepa, IBM | IBM Think 2020
>> Announcer: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, it's theCUBE! Covering IBM Think, brought to you by IBM. >> Hi everybody, welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of IBM 2020, it's the digital IBM 2020, the Think Event Experience. My name is Dave Vellante, and you are watching theCUBE. Steve Canepa is here, he's the global GM of Communications, of the Communications sector for IBM. Steve, how ya doing, good to have you on. >> Doing great Dave, thanks for having me. >> Yeah, you're very welcome. I mean, communications is sort of a broad term for the stuff you covered. Telco, Cable, Entertainment, Broadcast, Publishing, Satellite, Sports, Music, Games, I mean, Social, wow. You run the gamut. >> It's exciting times. >> Pretty big role, yeah, I'll say you've got exciting times. With so much going on in your space, and of course this pandemic is really, you know, hit the communications industry in so many different ways. Some tailwinds, some headwinds, and it's just crazy out there. What are you seeing and what are you guys doing to support clients? >> Well, first and importantly, our thoughts go out to everyone. As we're all dealing with this around the world. I have the opportunity to work with clients, in every geography, around the globe and each and everyone of them is busily dealing with how they make sure their employees are safe, how they're providing services to their customers. And, we're right there alongside them, helping them do that as well. For us in the telecommunication space, as you know, it's actually essential, it's an essential industry that's helping the world deal with this as we are all going virtual like this session we're having today. So we're working with clients to help them get their resources in place so that they can support their businesses, their network platforms, their media services in a way that they can keep the business running. Our telecommunications customers all around the globe had to get their resources and work at home environments, we work with many of them, in deploying real-time services. We also work with them in deploying call center chatbot capabilities so that they could answer questions from their customers, from other members of the community as they were coming in. So tremendous opportunity for us to help them respond to what's happening. >> It's actually quite amazing the response, when you think about telco, you think about telco infrastructure, what comes to mind is, it's hard and it's reliable, it works and all of a sudden you've got all these remote workers. The pace of the pivot has been actually quite astounding. I mean your thoughts on that. >> Yeah and it actually goes hand in glove in what way we've been preparing the industry for generally. I mean there's been this evolution that digital service providers that's been happening in the industry now for a number of years and in fact the center point of what we're doing now to help telcos virtualize and abstract those networks so that they're software based services platforms that can respond to these kinds of peak load demand issues. Not that anyone anticipated COVID, but the ability to have a platform, that can scale your business. And allow you to respond, move services where they need to be moved, be much more agile in the way you work. These are all playing in the ability to respond to it. >> Steve I want to ask you about something you said in a recent article in Forbes, you said, winners in the 5G and edge era will be those who embrace a hybrid multicloud approach." Well, first of all, I want to ask you, I mean five G can't get here fast enough, but still you're kind of predicting, my inference a five g and edge era coming this decade, like I said it can't happen soon enough. What are your thoughts on this coming era? >> In my view there's three fundamental things that are happening simultaneously. So first obviously, five g is emerging. It's showing up now. Most service providers around the world are starting to already deploy their private five g capabilities. We're seeing it show up in evolution form, in consumer marketplace. So five g is here and will continue to scale. The second key transformation that's happening is the telco network itself is becoming a hybrid cloud platform. What I mean by that is that just as when video abstracted as a service and it could be deployed over the top service platforms, enabling things like our interview that we're doing today to happen, that got loaded on top of now open IP platform. The same exact thing is happening in the network domain where the network services, data services, voice service, multimedia services are being put on an open platform architecture that allows you to respond. And then the third key thing that's happening in the market is this edge phenomenon. And this is all about the ability to move workloads, to move services out closer to where things happen and take advantage of those key five g features like ultra low latency, increased bandwidth, and of course the ability to slice the network down to dedicated to a specific application. This opens up a whole new set of services. >> Yeah I mean as I was sort of eluding to before, the reliability of telco networks has been the hallmark of that infrastructure. As we move to this more open sort of standardized environments Steve, I would imagine that one of the technical challenges is maintaining that level of reliability and predictability while at the same time being able to support remote workers, etc low latency workloads. Can you comment on that? >> Yeah so a couple of key points there. One is as you may know, IBM acquired Red Hat a little over a year ago. Red Hat has created an open platform for the telco's to modernize their core infrastructure. And the power of that is we can see is this enormous upstream community now and that community can help accelerate the rate pace of transformation is happening, bring innovation in. That's really powerful. The second is, once we go through an open platform, software based platform, we can infuse automation. Extreme levels of automation, and AI for intelligent predictive capability. And now think about the network becoming a living, breathing, responding platform where it's based on software. So we can deploy services and functions and we can automate those services and functions. That level of intelligence serves as the ability to then get out these services. >> So Steve, definitely we had I think a decent understanding of the Red Hat and the strategy around Open Shift and the container approach, hybrid multicloud. What I didn't realize is that there was specificity around the telco industry. Can you talk more specifically about what IBM is doing in that regard? >> Yeah, it's a great question. Red Hat has a very significant presence in 120 telcos around the globe. And so not only they're Red Hat Linux which is kind of a defacto standard in the marketplace, but their open stack architecture now we're moving after the Open Shift architecture. And as part of that the relationship with an enormous upstream community of talent, it's building on those platforms. And so we're able to really infuse into Red Hat the kind of requirements that are necessary for their software platform to serve as the platform, the open platform for the telcos as we go forward. It has been an incredible synergy. I think of it as kind of two puzzle pieces that fit together incredibly well. At IBM we've had the long standing relationship with all the service providers around the world and helping them transform their business and now with Red Hat we have the opportunity to really integrate what we're doing with automation and AI standpoint with all the power of that Red Hat Platform. >> So where do you see the edge fitting into this hybrid multicloud approach? Is it sort of an extension of cloud? Is it a new cloud? We know we are envisioning this seamless experience between on-prem, cloud, multicloud, and edge. >> Yeah I think of it in a kind of simple venn diagram where you have kind of this virtualized open software based telco network on one side and you have the edge on the other and in the middle you have this kind of combination where you do edge in partnership with the telco. And the idea here is that all industries are going to want to provide a next generation of insights to their customers and to their partners. The ability to move those workloads, so think about a manufacturing shop for an example. You know we've already had IoT centers, hundreds if not thousands of them. Now we can infuse video cameras and take a huge amount of data through the enhanced bandwidth of five g and bring that down to an edge platform and analyze that video data in real time, whether employees are in safe zones, maybe with COVID now even, whether or not they're taking the proper social distancing, and looking at actually everything that's coming off of that platform or manufacturing line, looking at the equipment itself and adding AI to that so that we can analyze it in real time. Edge allows us to take advantage of those five g attributes and to put it wherever that workload should run. Whether it's on the plant floor itself, in proximity to where that equipment is, or back at a central office location within the network of a telco. >> Well this is huge for the telcos because for years, I keep talking about their hardened network, but their cost per bit has been coming down. They're responsible for putting in that infrastructure, maintaining that infrastructure and then you got the over the top providers laying out content growing like crazy, has really disrupted that industry. This is going to change the way in which telcos are able to compete, is it not? >> It's a great point. Yes. If you think about the last generation of evolution you know when we went to four g and smartphones came out, think about the Apple App Store as an example. Folks started not going to the telcos anymore for those services, they went to that OTP capability to get those applications. Now think about about in this edge world as we essentially are creating platforms for innovation for businesses and all industries. And they can now innovate on those platforms and create incredible value in their business and the telcos now can add beyond just the transport capability, but artificial intelligence, automation, they can expose certain data capabilities, they can make those applications smarter, understanding proximity data, that could be applied to things like logistics or pricing or as I said operations like in manufacturing. So a tremendous new set of value in fact most analysts say a trillion dollars in value is going to be created here. And the opportunity I see is that the open network platform becomes a way for the service providers to not only capture value for themselves, but to accelerate the value for businesses in all industries. >> Well I think we're going to see some huge moves in the chess board. More M and A. I mean it's going to be a very exciting time and of course five g's at the heart of it, but Steve I wonder if you could give us IBM's point of view in terms of where we are with five g, I mean sometimes I see it pop up on my phone and I'm like come on, that's not real five g quite yet. We heard recently that Apple might somewhat delay it's new phones that maybe five g's involved in that, but it's going to take some time for that infrastructure to roll out but what's your point of view on sort of that time frame and the business impact that we can all expect? >> Yeah I know, it's a good question. And we will see it roll out over time. Some things are starting to roll out now. Think about stadiums or other venues where you have a manufacturing shop floor as an example, oil rig off the coast. I mean you have environments where you could create five g infrastructure in a private model today and then of course consumer models are going to roll out as cities continue to get deployed by the various service providers. But I think the important point which is what we've spoken about so far, is that as we start to create this platform capability around the edge and we start to transform those network themself to coincide telcos platform, we can start to capture those values today in a four g world and as five g comes along you just essentially evolve into the capabilities that that brings especially with regards to latency and bandwidth. Now some applications where slicing will be really important. Think about a medical operation where a doctor is consulting on a surgery in a remote location. Now if I know for sure that bandwidths going to be there, that doctor no longer has to be in the same location as that robotic equipment as an example. So the ability to have dedicated bandwidth which will come with five g, will be an important attribute that gets added. >> I mean the possibilities are really mind boggling. You mentioned stadiums. Now of course hopefully at some point we'll be able to go to football games again. But I mean the last decade was all about how big can you make the screen in the stadium versus this screen. This is where a lot of the action is going to be now. Replays and just the whole experience, ordering goods and services. And then of course hardened environments like oil rigs etc so really we're not just going to return to the last decade we've been talking about that a lot here. Go ahead please. >> An example that I like to mention just 'cause it kind of brings us all together, think about first responders. Now we're in the midst of the COVID thing but soon in California again unfortunately we'll probably get close to fire season. Think in a five g edge world what that might look like. So the minute that fire starts in some location in California, drones are in the air sending video down to an edge platform that's being analyzed to understand where that fire's going and importantly everything that's in it's path and how to best battle it. Sensors coming in from IoT centers in the area feeding in data. Our weather company app feeding in real time weather statistics, wind path, temperature changes, that are going to influence the way that that that fire performs. And now with the announcement we made Samsung just recently with our edge platform, the ability to have those first responders have sensors on them, Samsung devices that are measuring their vital signs and with the predictive models that are being built, we'll know whether that first responders' in distress or about to be in distress. The ability to scale our inbound communications capability digitally so that chat bots can handle this enormous increase in the amount of folks calling in to get information on what's happening in real time. And of course with the AI in that edge platform. Moving all of that physical equipment, the asset, humans, the first responders, in the optimal position at all times in order to get that fire out as soon as possible. I think it's a good example of how we can see these capabilities come together in a five g and edge world and allow us to get enormous value, saving lives, saving property, responding to an incident like that. >> I mean that's a great example of how you're going to put innovation into action 'cause you touched all points. Imagine the amount of data now that's being created and that example that you just gave, I mean it's just going exponential. Applying artificial intelligence, machine intelligence, and then the other phrase you used is real time. And we're talking about real time or near real time decisions actually being made potentially often times by the machines or in combination with humans so that these actions can be taken of course it's all occurring on an infrastructure that's sort of an expanding definition of cloud, not just on prem, not just hybrid, not just multicloud but now the edge. It's really going to be an exciting 10 years. >> You got it exactly right. And importantly, using that example, once that fire's put out, that edge platform can wind back down to where it was before the incident occurred. But all the intelligence that was gained during that, can be taken to the next incident has it happens. So this agility becomes really powerful 'cause we get the cumulative learning that happens in these models going forward. >> Amazing. So where can people go to get some more information on sort of IBM's edge approach? >> If you go to IBM.com, you'll see information on both on IBM edge solutions that we're putting forward into marketplace and what we're doing specifically with the telecommunication service providers to help them transform their networks to take advantage of this incredible opportunity. >> Well Steve, thanks so much for your time. Really great discussion. I appreciate you comin on and sharing with our community. >> My pleasure. Thank you. >> And thank you everybody. This is theCUBE's continuous coverage of IBM Think 2020, the Digital Event Experience. My name's Dave Vellante. Keep it right there, I'll be right back right after this short break. (relaxing music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by IBM. of the Communications sector for IBM. for the stuff you covered. to support clients? in every geography, around the globe The pace of the pivot has been but the ability to have a platform, Steve I want to ask you the ability to slice the that one of the technical And the power of that is of the Red Hat and the And as part of that the the edge fitting into and bring that down to an This is going to change the that the open network platform in the chess board. So the ability to have But I mean the last decade the ability to have those first responders and that example that you just gave, But all the intelligence that was gained So where can people go to their networks to take I appreciate you comin on and My pleasure. the Digital Event Experience.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Steve Canepa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Samsung | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | TITLE | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third key | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
120 telcos | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two puzzle pieces | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first responders | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
theCUBE Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
last decade | DATE | 0.97+ |
one side | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Red Hat Linux | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Think 2020 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.95+ |
five g | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first responders' | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Think Event Experience | EVENT | 0.9+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.88+ |
IBM 2020 | EVENT | 0.88+ |
five g | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
IBM | EVENT | 0.84+ |
this decade | DATE | 0.83+ |
COVID | TITLE | 0.82+ |
Apple App Store | TITLE | 0.82+ |
trillion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
three fundamental things | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.79+ |
five g | TITLE | 0.75+ |
g | OTHER | 0.75+ |
four g | ORGANIZATION | 0.69+ |