Image Title

Search Results for Youtube.com:

Geoff Swaine, CrowdStrike | AWS re:Inforce 2022


 

>>Hi, everybody. We're wrapping up day two of AWS reinforced the Cube's continuous coverage. My business partner, John furrier, and co-host is actually a Monaco, um, you know, getting ready to do a big crypto show over there. So they'll be reporting from there tomorrow. Check that out in the cube.net. Jeff Swain is here. He is the vice president of global programs store and tech alliances at CrowdStrike. Jeff, thanks for coming on. Thanks >>David. >>So tell us about your role, what store, help us understand that? >>Yeah, so CrowdStrike has a CrowdStrike store, which is, uh, effectively our marketplace within our application, and also available externally that allows customers to be able to review decide and trial products, not only from CrowdStrike, but also from our third party partners. So wherever we have a tech Alliance customer can come in, see the value of the integration, see how it works on our platform and the third parties platform, and then go and request a trial. So it's a very easy and dynamic way for a customer to understand that joint value proposition CrowdStrike has with various other, other vendors and our own products as well. >>So your role is to bring all these cool tech companies together and create incremental value. >>Yes. Um, we believe that the ecosystem is really a, a natural evolution of what's happened in terms of the crowd struck story. If you think that we started out with a, uh, you know, a very simple product in the very early days, 10, 10, 11 years ago, services company built a product. That product then became a platform with various modules in it. The next evolution of that is expanding out beyond our own platform and working into other areas of, of, of interest and value. So that's where the ecosystem comes into play. So you have to underpin that with some automations things like marketplaces and stores, you have to have integrations in place, joint applications and commercial vehicles to make that work. >>So I was walking around the other day and I, and it caught my eye and I sat there and listened for a better part of the presentation had to get back and do the queue, but it was a presentation between a CrowdStrike expert and an Okta expert. Yep. You know, better together was the whole thing. And, you know, I know it's kind of, and then they were describing how you guys compliment each other. So that would be an example, >>A perfect example. I mean, we, we, we compliment Okta and Okta complements us for very, in various different ways. And in fact, we sort of assemble that into different narratives that work well for our customers. So as an example with Okta, we ASEM, we work very well with them in zero trust. So we have a zero trust narrative that talks about how it works with Okta and also Zscaler. In fact, we have a, um, an Alliance through the cloud security Alliance where we're working to build practitioner guides, build, um, uh, a community of value across the different products to bring zero trust into some standardized, you know, uh, reference architectures and some standardized training that brings all of our products together for, for, for the user. That be example of a, of, one of the narratives that we have, they'd also play in our XDR narrative. Obviously XDR helps us bring telemetry in from different products. And again, we use XDR right across, you know, various, various, uh, tech >>Alliances. So, so take zero choice. So you'll take the concept of least privilege. Yep. And you'll apply that to what to end point to, you know, using identity Zscaler, you bring the cloud component. >>Correct. So then we are actually able to see how someone's traversing the entire organization. We can see who they are. We can see where they land. We can see what data they're accessing, where they're accessing. It gather a whole bunch of different telemetry around that and provide the security team with the ability to be able to see what someone's doing, enforce the, um, the, you know, access rights as, and where they need to see any anomalies or anomalous behavior within that and close it down before anything bad happens. So zero trust is a really important part of our, uh, of our, of, of, of our, um, narratives. >>And you have these plays or narratives with, with a bunch of ecosystem partners. Right? Correct. Mean, so take log management. >>Yep. >>Maybe add some context that, >>So, so around that happens, you may know we acquired, um, uh, humo, uh, right around that, where obviously we have to be able to ingest and have bridges out to a large variety of different platforms to be able to ship data into our platform. I mean, one of the values of humo is its ability to massively scale, um, and very, very easily cheaply bring, bring a lot of data into a simple place and have very fast searching. Well, what are you searching? You gotta go and have data sources. So, you know, very quickly we've built out a large number of integrations with, I think, over 30 partners to easily bring data into the Humira platform to let customers be able to have that advantage. >>So what role does AWS play in all this? >>AWS is a fantastic role in, um, both coordinating some of this in terms of, especially through the marketplace, the ability to, uh, coordinate our transactions between us and help us work together from a transactional basis, help the customer procure the right solutions together. But also AWS's nature. Natural, uh, inclination towards innovation means that they'll, they like to work with partners who, especially partners who are on their platform to drive a lot of innovation, to build out how customers are bringing more data together. Obviously it's beneficial to them in terms of the volumes of data that go computers that go across the AWS platform. But also they encourage us to work together. They, they, they say in some cases invest in those integrations. Um, they work with programs. They bring in third party reseller programs, uh, through C P O. So it gives us a, a platform gives us innovation. It gives us some structure. Um, it's been really exciting working with them. >>Now talk about CrowdStrike and your cloud strategy. How would you Des describe your cloud strategy? >>So we've been cloud native from day one. It's one of the, one of the founding principles of CrowdStrike. Um, as, as we were set up, uh, by a founder, so two elements, cloud native, and a single agent, and those two design principles have not been broken by us at any point through our history. It's very important that we, we stick to those two principles. Our cloud is, um, was born in AWS, um, and they've been supportive of us right through, right through our growth period. So we started out with one module, as I said, now we have, I think, 23 different modules and we're continually growing that. We also then have a lot of support for the cloud. So, you know, helping us understand what's happening within cloud environments so that our customers are better protected. In fact, the show here, we've announced two separate, um, uh, uh, incremental products to, to the cloud space. One that's very much focused on, um, adding, uh, better container or better visibility inside containers in our CNA product. And, um, and, and another area around how we do our threat hunting across the cloud. So we have a team of threat hunters, global best engineers who hunt right across our customers environments. We have a whole, whole bunch of additional cloud telemetry. So that's, that's been included into our, into our Overwatch threat hunting. >>So you'll ingest data from multiple clouds, right? You're running on AWS. Yes. But you can take data from anywhere from >>Anywhere, >>Including OnPrem. >>Um, so our sensor sits on laptops, servers, virtual servers devices. Do I devices wherever they need to say. Um, and then of it needs to be cloud connected. It comes into our, into our cloud. So we can, we can take information from instances in any cloud environment and any laptop, uh, to pretty much bring them in. And, uh, that's how it works, but it's a single cloud. I mean, our value proposition is that huge, um, uh, graph threat graph that we've built over the years, um, trillions and trillions of events per day, that we're now searching and using AI technologies to suite out. What's good. And what's bad. >>Yeah. So CrowdStrike, obviously we've reported on CrowdStrike in breaking analysis, a lot, CrowdStrike, Zscaler, Okta, a number of other, those, those companies you're partnering with all those guys, which is quite interesting. Yeah. You're all growing, you know, really nice, nice clips. I wonder, I always wonder in these situations, okay. As things get bigger and bigger and growth slows, we haven't seen that. See, you actually see the, we saw the cloud growth accelerating during the pandemic. Yeah. Right. But, but you know, you wonder, you see it all the time in this, in this industry is companies get big, they start doing M and a, they start getting it to adjacencies, you know, Google, apple, you know, uh, Cisco VMware, do you think you'll ever see a collision course with all these wonderful partners? Are we years away from that? Um, >>I think we're very careful with how we partner and who we partner with. Obviously we, we have discussions on what our future plans are to make sure that what we partner on is, is beneficial to both sides. Um, crowd strike itself. We're, we're growing all the time. You know, our platform has grown, as I said, the modules have grown, but in general, we've found is that our partners are taking the journey with us. Um, it's one of the advantages of, of the success that we've had is most of the partners want to be part of that journey rather than sort of, um, trying to go head on. But, you know, there's always opportunities for us to have open conversations and real dialogue to make sure that we do the right thing for the customer. And that's what drives everything that we do, you know, we're focused on the right products for the right >>Customers. What, what what's reinforcement like, what's the experience been? What, what's your takeaways from the show? >>Um, it's been a really excellent show for us in terms of, uh, getting out, meeting a lot, a lot of customers at a very decent senior level here. Actually's been very, very worthwhile. Um, we've had great response to the announcements that we've made. There's been a lot of, lot of activity through the booth, which is always great to see, um, from a, actually from a partnership perspective from my world, you know, I've had a large number of really great meetings with the AWSs leadership as well about what we can do together. Um, and the future looks really bright. >>Who's the, when you, when you think in thinking about, and I know you're not, you know, selling direct, but when you think about the constituencies, when you think about all the, the partners in your ecosystem that you're, you're building and collaborating with, who do you guys collectively talk to? You know, who do you appeal to? Is it the CISO? Is it the, you know, other security practitioners? Yeah. Is it the line of business? Is it the CIO architect who are the actors that you're sort of collaborating with in your customer >>Side? Yeah, it's really interesting obviously, cuz there's different personas depending on what it is that we're doing. Um, someone who's really interested in our log management narrative for example, is probably going to be maybe from the, the DevOps, um, uh, team or from, from that area for a C app. It's going to be someone in the cloud architecture, cloud security architecture space. Um, zero trust again will be someone who's got a bit of an identity, our area and privacy to them as well. Um, a lot of this comes up to the CISO and that's often our, you know, our, our, our economic buyer would be be in that space. But one of the things we have to do is we go into adjacent markets is learn the personas there and understand their habits and their buying cycles and, and, and build value propositions that work for those people. So it's an ongoing exercise. >>How do you see the CISO role evolving, uh, given, you know, cloud? One of my takeaways from Mr event is like, I feel like cloud is becoming the first line of defense. Mm-hmm <affirmative> the CISO and the developers becoming the second line of defense audit is like the third line of defense. Some people agree with that. Some people do so just merit bear said, no, no, it's all integrated into one thing. And I'm like, no, it's not, but okay. Yeah. But, but how is the CSO role evolving given that the cloud is becoming so much more prominent today? >>I think it's it's at this point, everyone said, you know, the CSO needs to evolve to being a direct member of the directly responsible to the board. This is something that we've all said for many years. Sure. If you look at what we see in the threat report, if you look at what we're seeing from the threat landscape, you know, the volume of threats that are coming through, not diminishing in any way, but in fact, the size and the impact of what they're doing is getting worse. So it, the risk that's being, um, uh, uh, that's being experienced is just getting worse all the time. However, we have different options for resolving that issue. You can go down a services led path with a, with an MDR player, like our file can complete, uh, process, or you can go down with an MSP. So the CISO's role is now not just on what products and how to Def, how to use them to best defend, but also what products, what services are available. >>What am I gonna invest in, in my team versus what am I going to push to a, to a, to a third party to look after for me. And we're seeing more and more companies at the going up the light up the, the, the enterprise stack, trusting us in our Falcon complete team, um, uh, with, with, with parts of their defense portfolio. So I think that role that you, you know, the CISO's role is developing all the time into something that's portfolio oriented. How am I getting value for service as well as value for money from products? It's a really interesting, it's really interesting development, um, in terms of what they have to deal with. Uh, you know, I still think that the, the visibility that you see from the endpoint is where's where it's where the, the Decron jewels are still it's where the data is. Mm-hmm <affirmative>. Um, and I think that's really why crowd strike is a unique proposition in that space. It's what >>We protect. So when you say the end point is where the data is, paint a picture of that. >>Well, if you think about, if a, if an actor is after at a personal information or IP, they're often going to be going down to the laptop or the, or the, or the virtual instance level to look for that within the weakest part, we've always said is people, um, and the more dive, the more open you are with that, the wider your audience there, the, the more risk you carry within that space, you know, we don't think endpoints laptops or phones, you know, servers, um, comput instances inside the cloud. They're all endpoint to us. Workloads is a better word. In fact, >>Those work, sorry, what's a better word >>Workloads >>Workloads. >>Okay. Yeah. We often talk about workloads rather than >>Is it data store and >>Endpoint? Yeah. If it's computer or not, it's, it's, it's basically, uh, it's a workload where, where we can put a sensor. How >>About a, how about a backup Corpus, uh, a backup backup Corpus of data? >>Well, I think if there's a, if there's a place that we can put a sensor on it to see whether it's being, you know, active or not, and we can track the telemetry from it, we would consider >>That sensor would be an agent. Yeah. An agent. Yeah. Yeah. Okay. And so you said single agent, >>We have one agent that runs all of our products this way, again, one of the design principles and, and the basics of our company, >>Because one of the things that we've seen, maybe tell me if you don't see this, is, is that a lot of times ransomware attackers will go after the, the, the backup Corpus mm-hmm <affirmative> disable it. Yeah. Because, you know, once you get that, you can't recover a hundred percent. Yeah. And they'll encrypt the, all the data on the network, and then they'll, they'll hold the backup Corpus hostage. >>This is one of the great advantages of how CrowdStrike and how our platform works. In fact, you know, um, a lot of other vendors talk in terms of, uh, you know, known bad known good, and, and, and indicators of compromise. Right. You know, I know this IP address has been compromised. I know that anything originating from here is bad. Um, what CrowdStrike looks at is, is, is we've built up a very, very, um, substantial, uh, library of what we call indicators of attack. Indications of attack are looking at the potential for attack. And whether, whether that in conjunction that specific piece of telemetry in conjunction with others makes the attack more likely. So for example, if someone, um, opens an email, we don't think that's necessarily, you know, a, a, a risk point, right. Um, but if someone opens an email and they click on an attachment, we think, well, maybe there's, there's, you know, that's happens billions of times a day, so still not bad, but if that then spills up, you know, a process, and if that process then starts to enumerate hard drives and start to look for backups, you know, we're getting more suspicious all the time. >>Um, and if they're then cause an encryption routine, we can be pretty certain at that point that what we've got in play is, is ransomware attack. Um, by looking at the holistic attack, the whole process of it, and having that sort of fingerprint of what that may look like. And in combining that with our knowledge of bad actors, our intelligence in the field, we've got a very good view on what may happen there. So exactly to your point, if we see, um, someone going after backups as part of a wider process that helps us identify that something of something bad is, is about to happen in terms of ransomware attack allows us to take action against it, put in the appropriate containment or blocking, >>And then explain. So, you know, when people hear agents, they're like, oh, another agent to manage, but I was talking to somebody the other day and saying, know, we're gonna integrate with the CrowdStrike agent because it's so robust. Correct. And what we are doing is, which is agent list is it's good, it's lightweight, but we can't get the data. Yep. You know, so explain that. So there's a trade off, right? I mean, you gotta manage an agent, right. But obviously it's working, your customers are, are adopting. >>So it's an extremely lightweight agent. That's always been the, the premise for this. And I think when George founded the company, one of the things he noticed was, you know, how long it was taking for someone to scan it, get us, get through a scan while they were trying to get an email out before a plane took off. And he said, you know, we can't have this. So, so he was looking at how do we make this as light as possible? Um, and, uh, and so that's one of been principle for us, right from day one. And you're right. Um, third parties do want to leverage our agent because of it's robustness. We look at pretty much everything that's happening as a telemetry event, once, once power hits the CPU through, till it drops out. So we've got very rich knowledge of what's happening on every single device or, or workload that's out there. >>And it's very usable for other people, as far as the customer's concerned, if a third party can use that information rather than have to deploy another agent, that's a huge win for the customer. I think we all know that proliferation of agents, Harrison, that's what, that was the old way of doing things. You know, people would acquire products and try and bundle 'em together and what they ended up with multiple agents competing for resources on the, on the system, by having one agent well defined, well architected, what we have is a modern, a modern software architecture to solve modern problems. >>Okay. So, uh, last question. Yep. When during the pandemic, we noticed that the, um, everything changed, obviously work from home remote work, and that the implications on the CISO were these permanent changes. And we reported on this and breaking analysis and other except endpoint, uh, you guys CrowdStrike, uh, uh, identity Okta got a boost, uh, cloud security, Zscaler. Yep. You know, got a boost, rethinking the network network. Security became top of mind that, and that we said is these are permanent changes, but now as we exit, but they were rushed as we exit the isolation economy. What can we expect going forward? >>I think to earlier point the ability for us to work across all of those areas and work better, you know, everyone was very much concentrating on delivered their own product as best as they could, as quickly as they could to meet the demands of the pandemic. Now we can go through a place of making sure that we work really, really well together as different units to solve the customer problem. So trim some of the trim trim, some of the, of, of, of the, the fat out of any integrations that we may have built quickly to solve a problem. Now we can focus on doing it really well. What we're seeing is a proliferation in our world of more applications in our store. So tighter integration inside our UI with our third party products, um, and a lot of demand for that. So really the, the customer experience is as seamless as possible. We talk about, you know, frictionless is what we want to see. Um, and that's, you know, the boost that the, the, the disruption got from the pan from the pandemic was fantastic start of the innovation. Right now, we have the opportunity to bring everything together, to really solve some excellent problems for customers, um, and make the world safer place. >>Jeff, great summary. Thank you for coming on. I'm gonna, I'm gonna give my quick take on, on this reinforc. I mean, I think very clearly AWS is, is enforcing the notion that that security is, is job one for them from the, the nitro chip, you know, all the way up the stack all the way through the culture. I mean, I think we heard that at, at this event. Um, I think you heard, you know, some great announcements, a lot of the stuff around, you know, threat detection and, and, and automation and, and, and reasoning, which is great. I don't think you heard a lot on how AWS are making the CISO's life simpler. I think a lot of that goes to the ecosystem. Mm-hmm <affirmative> maybe, uh, but the other thing is AWS leaving a lot of room, a lot of meat in the bone, as we like to say sometimes for the, for the ecosystem. >>Mm. Um, you know, security is a good example. I mean, you know, Microsoft makes a lot of money and security. AWS doesn't make a ton of money in security. It's just sort of comes with it. I think we're also seeing the changing role, the CISO, I think the cloud is becoming the first line of the fence, CISO and developers. The next line audit is really the third line and developer. The developer role is becoming increasingly important and, and frankly sophisticated, they gotta worry about securing the containers. They gotta worry about the run time. They have to worry about the platform as a service. And so, you know, developers need the team with the, with the, with the security operations team. So that's kind of my takeaway here. I think the event was, was, was good. It was not, it wasn't oversubscribed. I think people in, in Boston this time of year at the beach, um, whereas last 2019, you know, it was June. And so you get, you had a, a bigger attendance, but that's kind of my takeaway. Anything you'd add to that, Jeff, >>I think the quality has been here. Yeah. Um, you know, maybe not the quantity the quality has certainly been here. Um, I think, you know, there is, uh, a lot of innovation that's happening in the security industry. I think AWS has got some good products that they they're helping deliver, but as you said, they're there to help us support us and, and the other ISVs to really come together and build our best of breed overall solution that helps our customers and solve some of that complexity that you're seeing. And some of that uncertainty you're seeing is who has to solve what problem in the stack. Yeah. >>Well, thanks for that. Thanks for that. Thanks for help me wrap up here. The, the security space remains one that's highly fragmented, highly complex, you know, lack of talent is, is the, the problem that most organizations have. Lena smart of MongoDB doesn't have that problem nor does AWS, I guess cuz they're AWS and, and Mongo. Uh, but that's a wrap here from, from day two, the cube go to the cube.net. You'll see all these videos, youtube.com/silicon angle. If you want, you know, the YouTube link. Yeah. You can go there. Silicon angle.com is where we publish all the, the news of the day. wikibon.com for, for the research. This is Dave ante. Look for John furrier from Monica at, uh, the, the crypto event, uh, all this week. And we will see you next time. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : Jul 28 2022

SUMMARY :

you know, getting ready to do a big crypto show over there. and also available externally that allows customers to be able to review decide and trial So your role is to bring all these cool tech companies together and create So you have to underpin that with some automations things like marketplaces And, you know, I know it's kind of, you know, various, various, uh, tech to what to end point to, you know, using identity Zscaler, the ability to be able to see what someone's doing, enforce the, um, the, And you have these plays or narratives with, with a bunch of ecosystem partners. you know, very quickly we've built out a large number of integrations with, I think, the volumes of data that go computers that go across the AWS platform. How would you Des describe your So, you know, helping us understand what's happening within cloud environments But you can take data from anywhere from Um, and then of it needs to be cloud connected. they start doing M and a, they start getting it to adjacencies, you know, Google, apple, And that's what drives everything that we do, you know, we're focused on the right products for the right What, what what's reinforcement like, what's the experience been? my world, you know, I've had a large number of really great meetings with the AWSs leadership as well about what we can do together. Is it the, you know, But one of the things we have to do is we go into adjacent markets is learn the personas there How do you see the CISO role evolving, uh, given, you know, I think it's it's at this point, everyone said, you know, the CSO needs to evolve to being a direct member of the directly responsible Uh, you know, I still think that the, the visibility that you see from the endpoint is where's So when you say the end point is where the data is, paint a picture of we don't think endpoints laptops or phones, you know, servers, um, comput instances inside where we can put a sensor. And so you said single agent, Because one of the things that we've seen, maybe tell me if you don't see this, is, is that a lot of times ransomware um, opens an email, we don't think that's necessarily, you know, a, a, a risk point, Um, and if they're then cause an encryption routine, we can be pretty certain at that point that what we've got in play is, So, you know, when people hear agents, they're like, oh, another agent to manage, but I was talking to somebody the other day and one of the things he noticed was, you know, how long it was taking for someone to scan it, get us, get through a scan while they were trying I think we all know that proliferation When during the pandemic, we noticed that the, Um, and that's, you know, Um, I think you heard, you know, some great announcements, a lot of the stuff around, And so, you know, developers need the team with the, with the, Um, you know, maybe not the quantity the quality has certainly been here. one that's highly fragmented, highly complex, you know, lack of talent is,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JimPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

Paul GillinPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavidPERSON

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

PCCWORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VolantePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Michelle DennedyPERSON

0.99+

Matthew RoszakPERSON

0.99+

Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

Rebecca KnightPERSON

0.99+

Mark RamseyPERSON

0.99+

GeorgePERSON

0.99+

Jeff SwainPERSON

0.99+

Andy KesslerPERSON

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

Matt RoszakPERSON

0.99+

Frank SlootmanPERSON

0.99+

John DonahoePERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Dan CohenPERSON

0.99+

Michael BiltzPERSON

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Michael ConlinPERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

MeloPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

NVIDIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

Joe BrockmeierPERSON

0.99+

SamPERSON

0.99+

MattPERSON

0.99+

Jeff GarzikPERSON

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

JoePERSON

0.99+

George CanuckPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Rebecca NightPERSON

0.99+

BrianPERSON

0.99+

Dave ValantePERSON

0.99+

NUTANIXORGANIZATION

0.99+

NeilPERSON

0.99+

MichaelPERSON

0.99+

Mike NickersonPERSON

0.99+

Jeremy BurtonPERSON

0.99+

FredPERSON

0.99+

Robert McNamaraPERSON

0.99+

Doug BalogPERSON

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

Alistair WildmanPERSON

0.99+

KimberlyPERSON

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

Sam GroccotPERSON

0.99+

AlibabaORGANIZATION

0.99+

RebeccaPERSON

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

Justin Murrill, AMD & John Frey, HPE | HPE Discover 2022


 

>> Announcer: theCUBE presents HPE Discover 2022. Brought to you by HPE. >> Okay, we're back here at HPE Discover 2022, theCUBE's continuous coverage. This is day two, Dave Vellante with John Furrier. John Frey's here. He is the chief technologist for sustainable transformation at Hewlett Packard Enterprise and Justin Murrill who's the director of corporate responsibility for AMD. Guys, welcome to theCUBE. Good to see you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. It's great to be here. >> So again, I remember the days where, you know, CIOs didn't really care about the power budget. They didn't pay the power budget. You had, you know, facilities over here, IT over here and they didn't talk to each other. That's changed. Why is there so much discussion around sustainable IT today? >> It's exciting to see how much it's up leveled, as you say. I think there are a couple different trends happening but mainly, you know, the IT teams and IT leaders that are making decisions are seeing to your point how their decisions are affecting enterprise level, greenhouse gas emission reduction goals. So that connection is becoming very clear. Everything from the server processor to beyond it, those decisions have a key role. And importantly we're seeing, you know, 60% of the Fortune 500 now have climate or energy efficiency related goals. So there's a perfect storm of sorts happening where more companies setting goals, IT decision makers looking particularly at the data center because as the computational heart of an organization, it has a wealth of opportunity from an energy and a mission savings perspective. >> I'm surprised it's only 60%. I mean, that number really shocked me. So it's got to be a 100% within the next couple of years here. I would think, I mean, it's not trivial, right? You've got responsibilities in terms of reporting and you can't just mail it in, right? >> Yeah, absolutely. So there's a lot more disclosure happening but the goal setting is really upleveling as well. >> And the metrics involved too. Can you just scope the scale and challenge of like getting the right metrics, not when you have the goals. Does that factor in, how do you see there? What's your commentary on that? >> Yeah, I think there's, the aperture is continuing to open as metrics go, so to speak. So from an operations perspective, companies are reporting on what's referred to as scope one and scope two. And scope two is the big one from electricity, right? And then scope three is everything else. That's the supply chain and the outside of that. So a lot of implications there as well from IT decision making. >> Is there a business case for sustainable IT? I mean, you're probably not going to lower the power budget, right? But is it just, hey, it's the right thing to do. We have to do it, it's good for the brand. It'll allow us to attract people or is there a a more of a rich business case? >> So there really is a business case even just within inside the data center walls, for example. There's inefficiencies that are inherent in many of these data centers. There's really low utilization levels as well. And by reducing over provisioning and increasing utilization, there's real money to be saved in terms of equipment costs, maintenance agreement costs, software licensing costs. So actually the power consumption and the environmental piece is an added benefit but it's not the main reason. So we actually had IDC do a survey for us last year and we asked IT executives, 500 senior IT executives, were you implementing sustainable IT programs and why? My guess initially was about 40% of them would say yes. Actually the number was 96% of them. And when we asked them why they fell into three categories. The digital leaders, those that are the early adopters moving the quickest. They said we do it to attract and retain institutional investors. They've been hearing from their boards. They've been hearing from their investor relations teams and investors are starting to ask and even in a couple cases board seats are becoming contentious based on the environmental perspective of the person being nominated. This digital mainstream, the folks in the middle about 80% of the total pie, they're doing it to attract and retain customers because customers are asking them about their sustainable IT programs. If they're a non-manufacturing customer, their data center consumption is probably the largest part of their company. It's also by the way usually the most expensive real estate the company owns. So customers are asking and customers are not only asking, do you have basic programs in place? But they're asking, what are your goals to Justin's point? The customers are starting to realize that carbon goals have been vaguely defined historically. So they're asking for specificity, they're asking for transparency and by the way the science-based target initiative recently released their requirements for net zero science-based targets. And that requires significant reduction to your point before you start considering renewable energy in that balance. The third reason those digital followers, that slowest group or folks that are in industries that move the slowest, they said they were doing this to attract and retain employees. Because they recognize the data scientists, the computer science, computer engineering students that they're trying to attract want to work at a company where they can see how what they do directly contributes to purpose. And they vote with their feet. If they come on and they can't make that connection pretty quickly or if they spend a lot of their time chasing down inefficiencies in a technology infrastructure, they're not going to stay there very long. >> I mean, the mission-driven organization is definitely an employee factor. People are interested in that. The work for company is responsible, doing the right thing but that business case is interesting because I think there's recognition now more than ever before. You think you're right on. It used to be kind of like mailed it in before. Okay, we're doing some stuff. Now it's like, we all have to do it. And it's a board issue. It's a financing issue. It might be a filing issue as you guys mentioned. So that's all great. So I got to ask how you guys specifically are working together, AMD and HPE. What are you guys doing to make it more efficient? And then I'll see with Cloud and Cloud scale, there's more servers being shipped now than ever before. And more devices at the edge. What are you guys doing together specifically? >> Yeah, we've been working together, AMD and HPE on advancing sustainability for many years. I've had the opportunity to working directly with John for many years and I've learned a lot from him and your team. It's fantastic to see all the developments here. I mean, so most recently the top 500 and the green 500 list of supercomputers came out. And at the top of that list is AMD HPE systems. And it shows kind of the pinnacle of what can be possible for other data centers looking to modernize and scale. So the number one system, the fastest system in the world and the most energy efficient system in the world, the Frontier supercomputer has AMD HPE technology in it. And it just passed the exit scale barrier. I mean, I'm still just blown away by this. A billion, billion calculations per second. It's just amazing. And the research is doing around clean energy, alternative energy sources, scientific research is really exciting. So there's that. The other system that really jumps out is the LUMI system, the number three system because it's a 100% powered by renewable energy. So not only that, it takes the heat and it channels it to a nearby town and covers 20% of that town's heating needs thereby avoiding 12,400 metric tons of carbon emissions. So this system is carbon negative, right? And you just go down the list. I mean, AMD is in the top eight out of 10 most green... >> Rewind that second. So you have the heat and the power shifting to a town? >> Yes, the LUMI supercomputer has the heat from the system to an nearby town. It's like a closed loop, the idea of circular economy but with energy. And it takes that waste and it makes it an input, a resource. >> But this is the kind of innovation that's going on, right? This is the scale, this is where scale and efficiency kind of come together. That's huge. Where's that going to go? What's your perspective on where that goes next because that's a blueprint that could be replicated. >> You bet. So I think we're going to continue to see overall power consumption go up at the system level. But performance per wat is climbing much more dramatically. So I think that's going to continue to scale. It's going to require a new cooling technology. So direct liquid cooling is becoming more and more in use and customers really interested in that. There's shifting from industry standard architectures to lower end high performance computer architectures to get direct liquid cooling, higher core processors and get the performance they want in a smaller footprint. And at the same time, they're really thinking about how do we operate the infrastructure as a system not as individual piece parts. And one of the things that Frontier and LUMI do so well is they were designed from the start as a system, not as piece parts making up the system. So I think that happens. The other thing that's really critical is no one company is going to solve these challenges ourself. So one of the things I love about our partnership with AMD is we look at each other's sustainability goals before we launch 'em. We say, well, how can we help? One of AMD's goals that I'll let Justin talk about came about because HPE at the time of separation laid a really aggressive product, energy efficiency goal out, said but we're not sure how we're going to make this. And AMD said we can help. So that collaboration, we critique each other's programs, we push each other, but we work together. I like to say partnership is leadership in this. >> Well, that's a nuance point. Before you get to that solution there Justin, this system's thinking is really important. You're seeing that now with Cloud. Some of the things that GreenLake and the systems are pointing out, this holistic systems' thinking is applied to partnerships, not just the company. >> Yep. >> This is a really nuanced point but we're seeing that more and more. >> Yeah, absolutely. In fact, Justin mentioned the heat reuse, same way with the national renewable energy lab. They actually did snow removal and building heating with the heat reuse. So if you're designing for example, a liquid cold system from the start, how do you make it a symbiotic relationship? There's more and more interest in co-locating data centers and greenhouses in colder environments for example. Because the principle of the circular economy is nothing is waste. So if you think it's waste or you think it's a byproduct, think about how can that be an input to something else. >> Right, so you might put a data center so you can use ambient cooling or in somewhere in the Columbia River so you can, you know, take advantage of, you know, renewable energy. What are some goals that you guys can share with us? >> So we've got some great momentum and a track record coming off of, going back to 2014, we set a 25 by 20 goal to improve the energy efficiency for our mobile processors and mobile devices, right? So laptops. And we were able to achieve a 31.7x in that timeframe. So which was twice the industry trend to that. And then moving on, we've doubled down on data center and we've set a new goal of a 30x increase in energy efficiency for our server processors and accelerators to really focused on HPC and AI training. So that's a 30x goal over 2020 to 2025 focused on these really important workloads 'cause they're fast growing. We heard yesterday 150 billion devices connected by 2025 generating a lot of data, right? So that's one of the reasons why we focused on that. 'Cause these are demanding workloads. And this represents a 2.5x increase over the historical trend, right? And fundamentally speaking, that's a 97% reduction in energy use per computation in five years. So we're very pleased. We announced an update recently. We're at 6.8x. We're on track for this goal and making great progress and showing how these, you know, solutions at a processor level and an accelerator level can be amplified, taken into HPE technology. >> Generally tech companies, you know, that compete want to rip each other's faces off. And is that the case in this space or do you guys collaborate with your competitors to share best practice? Is that beginning? Is it already there? >> There's much more collaboration in this space. This is one of the safe places I think where collaboration does occur more. >> Yeah. And we've all got to work together. A great example that was in the supply chain. When HPE first set our supply chain expectations for our suppliers around things like worker rights and environment and worker protection from a health and safety perspective. We initially had our code of conduct asked their suppliers to comply with it. Started auditing in event. And we quickly got into the factories and saw they were doing it for our workloads. But if you looked around the factory, they weren't doing in other places. And we took a step back and said, well, wait a minute. Why is that? And they said that vendor doesn't require it. So we took a step back and said let's get the industry together. We share a common supply chain. How do we have a common set of expectations and push them out to our supply chain? How to now do third party audits so the same supplier doesn't get audited by each of the major vendors and then share those audit results. And what we found was that really had a large lever effect of moving the electronic supply chain much more rapidly towards our expectations in all those areas. Well then other industries looked and said, well, wait a minute, if that worked for electronics, it'll probably work broader. And so now, the output of that is what's called the responsible business alliance across many industries taking that same approach. So that's a pre-competitive. We all have the same challenge. In many cases we share a common supply chain. So that's a great example of electronic companies coming together, design standards for things. There's a green grid group at the moment looking at liquid cooling connects. You know, we don't want every vendor to have a different connection point for liquid cooling for example. So how do we standardize that to make our customers have a easier time about looking at the technologies they want from any vendor and having common connection points. >> Right. Okay. So a lot of collaboration. Last question. How much of a difference do you think it can make? In other words, what percent of the blame pie goes to information technology? And I think regardless, you got to do your part. Will it make a dent? >> I think the sector has done a really good job of keeping that increase from going up while exponentially increasing performance. So it's been a really amazing industry effort. And moving forward, I think this is more important than ever, right? And with the slowdown of Moore's law we're seeing more gains that need to come from beyond process architecture to include packaging innovations, to power management, to just the architecture here. So the challenge of mitigating and minimizing energy growth is important. And we believe like with that 30x energy efficiency goal that it is doable but it does take a lot of collaboration and focus. >> That's a great point. I mean, if you didn't pay attention to this, IT could really become a big piece of the pie. Guys thanks so much for coming on theCUBE. Really appreciate. >> People are watching. They're paying attention at all levels. Congratulations. >> Absolutely. >> All right, Dave Vellante, John Furrier and our guests. Don't forget to go to SiliconANGLE.com for all the news. Our YouTube channel, actually go to CUBE.net. You'll get all these videos in our YouTube channel, youtube.com/SiliconANGLE. You can check out everything on demand. Keep it right there. We'll be right back. HPE Discover 2022 from Las Vegas. You're watching theCUBE. (soft music)

Published Date : Jun 29 2022

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by HPE. He is the chief technologist It's great to be here. So again, I remember the days where, Everything from the server So it's got to be a 100% but the goal setting is And the metrics involved too. and the outside of that. the right thing to do. and by the way the science-based So I got to ask how you guys specifically I've had the opportunity to So you have the heat and the has the heat from the system This is the scale, and get the performance they and the systems are pointing out, a really nuanced point but a liquid cold system from the start, or in somewhere in the So that's one of the reasons And is that the case in this space This is one of the safe places And so now, the output of that of the blame pie goes So the challenge of mitigating a big piece of the pie. People are watching. SiliconANGLE.com for all the news.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Justin MurrillPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

John FreyPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

JustinPERSON

0.99+

30xQUANTITY

0.99+

20%QUANTITY

0.99+

2014DATE

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

2.5xQUANTITY

0.99+

AMDORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

LUMIORGANIZATION

0.99+

12,400 metric tonsQUANTITY

0.99+

31.7xQUANTITY

0.99+

97%QUANTITY

0.99+

FrontierORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

96%QUANTITY

0.99+

25QUANTITY

0.99+

2025DATE

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

Columbia RiverLOCATION

0.99+

HPEORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

eachQUANTITY

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

500 senior IT executivesQUANTITY

0.99+

GreenLakeORGANIZATION

0.99+

twiceQUANTITY

0.99+

60%QUANTITY

0.99+

6.8x.QUANTITY

0.99+

10QUANTITY

0.99+

Hewlett Packard EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.98+

third reasonQUANTITY

0.98+

2020DATE

0.98+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.97+

CUBE.netOTHER

0.97+

150 billion devicesQUANTITY

0.97+

about 40%QUANTITY

0.97+

about 80%QUANTITY

0.97+

SiliconANGLE.comOTHER

0.96+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.96+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

firstQUANTITY

0.95+

LUMIOTHER

0.92+

zeroQUANTITY

0.92+

eightQUANTITY

0.91+

HPE Discover 2022TITLE

0.91+

IDCORGANIZATION

0.9+

20 goalQUANTITY

0.89+

todayDATE

0.88+

carbonQUANTITY

0.86+

day twoQUANTITY

0.8+

500QUANTITY

0.78+

next couple of yearsDATE

0.77+

billion, billion calculations per secondQUANTITY

0.74+

three categoriesQUANTITY

0.72+

coupleQUANTITY

0.7+

500 listQUANTITY

0.7+

youtube.com/SiliconANGLEOTHER

0.7+

three systemQUANTITY

0.66+

Discover 2022EVENT

0.66+

VeeamON 2022 Wrap | VeeamON 2022


 

>>We're seeing green here at Vemo in 2022, you're watching the cube, Dave ante and David Nicholson wrapping up our second day of coverage. Dave, good show. Good to be, you know, again, good to be back. This is our third show in a row. We're a Cuban as well. So the cube is, is out there, but same every, every show we go to so far has been most of the people here haven't been out in two plus years. Yeah. Right. And, and, and they're like, Hey, let's go. Let's hug. Let's shake. I got my red band on cuz we've been on a lot of shows or just being careful <laugh> um, you know, Hey, but it's great to see people back, uh, >>Absolutely >>Such a different vibe than virtual virtual sucks. Everybody hates it now, but now it's going hybrid. People are trying to figure that out. Yeah. Uh, but it's, it's in your view, what's different. What's the same >>In terms of, uh, in person versus hybrid kind of what's happened since what's >>Different being here now versus say 2019, not that you were here in 2019, but a show in 2019. >>I, I think there's right now, there's a certain sense of, uh, of appreciation for the ability to come and do this. Mm-hmm <affirmative> um, >>As opposed to on we or oh, another show, right? >>Yeah. Yeah, exactly. And, and, uh, a personal opinion is that, um, I think that the hybrid model moving forward is going to end up being additive. I don't know that I don't, you know, people say we'll never go back to having in person the way we did before. Um, I'm holding out hope that that's not the case because I, I think so there's so much value to the kinds of conversations that we have, not only here on the set with folks in person, but just the hallway conversations, uh, the dinner conversations, um, those are so critical, uh, not only with between vendors and customers, but between different business units. Um, you know, I, I, I came into this thinking, you know, I know Veeam very well. I've known them since the beginning. Um, but you think I'm going to a conference to talk about backup software and it wasn't like that at all. I mean, this is, this is an overarching, very, very interesting subject to cover. So how is it different? I think people are appreciative. I wouldn't say we're backed full throttle a hundred percent, um, uh, back in the game yet. But, uh, but we we're getting there. Some >>Of the highlights Veeam now, number one, statistical tie for first place in revenue. There aren't a lot of segments, especially in storage where Dell is not number one, I guess technically Dell is like, I don't know, half a percentage point ahead, but Veeam's gonna blow by that. Unless Dell gets its data, >>Protect me as the luxury of focus, they can focus >>Like a laser on it focus. Right? That, that we, we saw this in the P PC where focused, we saw Dell's ascendancy cuz they were focused on PCs, right? Yeah. We saw Seagate on dis drives Intel and microprocesors Oracle on databases and, and, and Veeam applied that model to what they call modern data protection. Um, and, and the, so the reason why we think they're gonna go past is they growing at 20 plus percent each year. And, and I can almost guarantee Dell's data protection business isn't although it's been in a, I, I sense a downward slope lately, they don't divulge that data. Um, but if they were growing nicely, they would be talking about it. So I think they've been kind of hiding that ball, but Dell, you know, you can't count those guys out they're baby. >>No, you can't. And there's always >>A, they don't like to lose. They get that EMC DNA still in >>There. Yeah. You take, you can, you might take your eye off the ball for a little while to focus on other things. But uh, I think it'll be healthy for the industry at large, as Veeam continues to take market share. There's definitely gonna be pushback from, from others in the field, but >>The pure software play. Um, and you know that no hardware agenda thing and all that I think is, is clearly in Veeam's favor. Uh, but we'll see. I mean, Dell's got other, other strengths as do others. I mean, this is, this is, let's not forget this, this, this market is crowded and getting kind. I mean, you got, you got other players, new, new entrants, like cohesive in Rubrik Rubic, by the way is the one I was kind of referring to. That seems to be, you go to their LinkedIn, they seem to be pivoting to security. I was shocked when I saw that. I'm like, wow, is that just like a desperation move? Is that a way to get your valuation up? Is that, is there something I'm missing? I, I don't know. I haven't talked to those guys in a little bit, need to get, get there, but cause he and Rubrik couldn't get to IPO prior to, uh, you know, the, the, the, the, the tech sell off the tech lash. >>If you will Veeam, didn't need toves. We have 30% EBITDA and, and has had it for a while. So they've been, they caught lightning in a bottle years ago, and then now they got the inside capital behind them. Um, you got new entrance, like, like Kuo, you got com. Vault is out there. You still got, you know, Veritas is still out there competing and you know, a number of other, you get you got is wherever HP software landed in, in the MicroStrategy, uh, micro strategy. <laugh> um, no not micro strategy anyway, in that portfolio of companies that HP sold its software business to, you know, they're still out there. So, you know, a lot of ways to, to buy backup and recovery software, but these guys being the leader is no surprise. >>Yeah. You know, it's, I, I, I have to say it to me. It's a classic story of discipline >>Microfocus, sorry, >>Microfocus. Yeah, that's right. That's right. You know, it's funny. I, I, I could see that logo on a, I know I've got a notebook at home. Um, but, but theme is a classic example of well disciplined growth where you're not playing the latest buzzword game and trying to create adjacent businesses that are really, that might sound sexy, but have nothing to do with your core. They've been very, very disciplined about their approach, starting with, you know, looking at VMFS and saying, this is what we're gonna do, and then branching out from there in a logical way. So, so they're not out ahead of the tips of their skis in a way that some others have have gotten. And those, you know, sometimes swinging for the fence is great, but you can strike out that way also. And they've been hitting, you know, you could say they've been hitting singles and doubles just over and over and over again for years now. Well, that's been a great strategy. >>You've seen this a lot. I mean, I, I think you watched this at EMC when you were there as you, it was acquisitions to try to keep the growth up. It was, it was great marketing. I mean, unbelievable marketing cloud meets big data. Oh yeah. And you'd hear on CNBC. AMC is the cloud company. You're like, eh, fucking have a cloud. So, so you, you you've seen companies do that to your point about getting ahead of your skis. VMs never done that EMS like, eh, this is the product that works great. Yeah. Customers love it. They buy it, you know, we got the distribution channel set up and so that's always been, been, been part of their DNA. Um, and I think the other piece is putting meat on the bone of the tagline of modern data protection. When I first heard that I'm like, mm, okay. >>But then when you peel the onion on that, the core is back up in recovery, a lot of focus on recovery. And then the way they, I remember it was there in the audience when they announced, you know, support for bare metal, people went crazy. I'm like, wow, okay. They cuz they used to say, oh, never virtualization forever. Okay. So they beat that drum and you never say never in this business, do you, and then moving on to cloud and hybrid and containers and we're hearing about super cloud now, and maybe there'll be an edge use case there it's still unclear what that pattern is. You've talked about that with Zs, but it's not clear to me where you put your muscle yet in, um, in edge, but really being able to manage all that data that is people talk about data management that starts to be data management. And they've got a footprint that enables 'em to do that. >>Yeah. And, and I'd like to see that same discipline approach. That's gotten them here to continue no need to get on board a hype cycle. Um, what I really love from a business execution perspective from Veeam is the fact that they know their place in terms of the, their strategic advisory role for end user customers and their places largely in partnership with folks in the channel partners, large and small, um, in a couple of the conversations we had over the last few days, we talked about this idea that there are fewer and fewer seats at the table. Uh, working with customers, customers can't have 25 strategic vendor partners and a lot of smaller niche players that focus on something even as important as backup will pretend that they are, that they hold the same sort of strategic weight as a hyperscale cloud provider. Does they pretend that they're gonna be there in the CX O meetings? Um, when they're not Veeam knows exactly how to best leverage what they do with customers and that's through partners in the channel. >>The other thing is, um, new CEO, a non Eron, uh, the fifth CEO, I think I'm correct. Is that right at, at VE yes. Um, so two founders, uh, and then when Peter McKay came on, he was co CEO. Um, and then, um, yep. And let's see, I think yep. You the fifth. Okay. So each of the CEOs kind of had their own mark. Right. Um, and we asked an on in the analyst thing, what do you want your legacy to be? And I, I loved his answer. He's like, this is a fragmented business with a lot of adjacencies and we are the leader in revenue, but we only have 12% revenue share. I want to take that to 25%, 40%. That's like EMC at 30 plus percent of the storage market, Cisco of 60% of the networking market. Wow. If anybody could ever get there, but so 25 to 30% of a market that's that's big. Yeah. I liked his demeanor thought he had a really good style philosophy. Well-spoken well spoken. So new leadership, obviously insight brought him in to take them to the next level. Um, and, and really drive. I gotta believe get ready for IPO. We kind of admitted that. >>Yeah. And I, and IPO for them, one thing he mentioned is that, um, in this case, this is not an IPO let's high five and go to Vegas and get table service because now we finally have money. Uh, they're not doing, you know, obviously an injection in capital from an IPO is always a good thing or should be a good thing if handled properly, but that's not their primary driver. So it'll be very interesting to see if they can hit the timing. Right. Um, how that, how that works out >>Well and, and bill large is his was predecessor. Uh, he, he, he took over, uh, once the company, excuse me, went private. Um, >>Yeah, that phone backed up. >>I still good in the mic once the company went private, uh, well, no, they were always private. Once they got acquired for five plus billion dollars from inside capital, um, they, they put bill in charge, perfect choice for the transition. And it was like, okay, bill. It's like, when you, my brother's a sailor. He says, Hey, take, take the wheel, see that lighthouse or see that tree go for it, keep it on track. And that's what bill did. Perfect. And he knew the company knew where all the skeletons were buried and, and was perfect. Perfect transition for that. Now they're bringing in somebody who they feel can take it to the next level. They're at a billion. He said he could see 5 billion and, and beyond. So that's kind of cool. Um, the other thing was ecosystem as companies got a really robust ecosystem, all the storage array vendors came on. >>The, the, the backup appliance companies, you know, came on to the cube and had a presence here. Why? Because this is where all the customers are. This is the leader in backup in recovery. Yeah. They all want to partner with that leader. Now they're at out the other shows as well, uh, for the Veeam competitors, but frankly, Veeam, Veeam competitors. They don't have, like you said, they're pure play. Many of them don't have a show like this, or it's a smaller event. Um, and so they gotta be here. Uh, and I think the, the, the other thing was the ransomware study. What I really liked about Veeam is they not only just talked about it, they not only talked about their solution. They sh they did deep dive surveys and shared a ton of data with guys that knew data. Um, Dave Russell and Jason Buffington, both former analysts, Russell was a Gartner very well respected top Gartner analyst for years. Jason buff, Buffington at ESG who those guys did always did some really good, still do deep research. So you had them representing that data, but sharing it with the community, of course, it's, it's gonna be somewhat self-serving, but it wasn't as blatant. It that wasn't nearly as blatant as I often see with these surveys, gender surveys, I'll look at 'em. I can tell within like, seconds, whether it's just a bunch of marketing, you know, what, or there's real substance. Yeah. And this one had real substance to >>It. Yeah. And it's okay. When substance supports your business model. >>Yeah. Cool. >>It's great. Good >>Marketing. But yeah, as an best marketing, I'm not gonna use it. The whole industry can use this and build on it. Yeah. I think there were a lot of unanswered questions. I, what I love about Vema is they're going back and they, they did it in February. They, they updated it just recently. Now they're going back and doing more cuz they want to get it by country. So they're making investments. And then they're sharing that with the industry. I love that. >>It'll be interesting to see if they continue it over time, how things change if things change. Um, one of the things that we really didn't talk a lot about is, uh, and you know, it's, I know it's talked about behind closed doors, um, this idea of, uh, stockpiling day zero exploits, and the fact that a lot of these, these >>Things, >>A lot of these problems arguably could have been headed off, had our taxpayer funded organizations, shared information with private industry in a more timely fashion. Um, um, we had, um, uh, uh, was it, uh, Gina from AWS who gave the example of, uh, the not Petia, uh, experience in the hospital environment. And that came directly out of frankly a day zero exploit that the NSA had identified years earlier within Microsoft's operating system. And, uh, somehow others got ahold of that and used it for nefarious means. So the intent to stockpile and hang onto these things is always, um, noble, but sometimes the result is, uh, less than desirable. So that's, it'll be an interesting conversation. >>We'd be remiss if we didn't mention the, the casting acquisition, the, the, the container data protection, small piece of the business today. Uh, but strategic in the sense that, yeah, absolutely. If you want to appeal to developers, if, if, if, if, if you want to be in the cloud, you know, you better be able to talk containers generally in Kubernetes specifically. So they gotta play there as well. >>Well, they, they, they hit virtualization cloud containers. Maybe I'm missing something in between, but they seem to be >>Ransomware >>Catching waves effectively. Yeah. Ransomware, uh, catching waves effectively, uh, again, not in an artificial buzzword driven way, but in a legitimate disciplined business growth approach that, uh, that's impressive. >>And I, and I think Danny mentioned this, we, he said we've been a PLG product led growth company. Um, and I think they're evolving now. We talked about platforms versus product. We still got still a product company. Uh, but they're bill wants to build out a Supercloud. So we're watching that very closely. I, I think it is a thing. You got a lot of grief for the term, super cloud. Some people wince at it, but it's, there's something brewing. There's something different. That's not just cloud public cloud, not hybrid cloud, not private cloud it's across cloud it's super cloud. All right, Dave, Hey, it was a pleasure working with you this week. Always kind of funny. I mean, we're, the crew was out in, uh, in Valencia, Spain. Yeah. Uh, they'll in fact, they'll be broadcasting, I believe all the way through Friday. Uh, that's an early morning thing for the, uh, for the west coast and, but east coast should be able to catch that easily. >>Of course you can all check out all the replays on the cube.net, also YouTube, youtube.com/silicon angle go to wikibon.com. There's some, you know, research there I publish every week and, and others do, uh, as well, maybe not as frequently, but, uh, we have a great relationship with ETR. I'm gonna poke into some data protection stuff in their survey. See if I can find some interesting, uh, data there. And don't forget to go to Silicon an angle.com, which is all the news. This is the cube, our flagship production we're out at VEON 2022. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : May 20 2022

SUMMARY :

Good to be, you know, again, good to be back. What's the same Different being here now versus say 2019, not that you were here in 2019, for the ability to come and do this. I don't know that I don't, you know, people say we'll never go back to having in person the way we did Of the highlights Veeam now, number one, statistical tie for first place in revenue. but Dell, you know, you can't count those guys out they're baby. No, you can't. A, they don't like to lose. There's definitely gonna be pushback from, from others in the field, but Um, and you know that no hardware agenda thing and all that I think is, and you know, a number of other, you get you got is wherever HP software landed It's a classic story of discipline And those, you know, sometimes swinging for the fence is great, but you I mean, I, I think you watched this at EMC when you were there as you, but it's not clear to me where you put your muscle yet in, and a lot of smaller niche players that focus on something even as important as backup will So each of the CEOs kind of had their own mark. Uh, they're not doing, you know, obviously an he took over, uh, once the company, excuse me, Um, the other thing was ecosystem Um, and so they gotta be here. When substance supports your business model. It's great. And then they're sharing that with the Um, one of the things that we really didn't talk a lot about is, uh, and you know, it's, So the intent to stockpile and hang onto these things is always, um, noble, if, if, if, if, if you want to be in the cloud, you know, but they seem to be business growth approach that, uh, that's impressive. And I, and I think Danny mentioned this, we, he said we've been a PLG product led growth company. you know, research there I publish every week and, and others do, uh, as well,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Jason BuffingtonPERSON

0.99+

FebruaryDATE

0.99+

Peter McKayPERSON

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

David NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

RussellPERSON

0.99+

2019DATE

0.99+

AMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

5 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

Dave RussellPERSON

0.99+

25QUANTITY

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

60%QUANTITY

0.99+

BuffingtonPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

fifthQUANTITY

0.99+

VeeamORGANIZATION

0.99+

HPORGANIZATION

0.99+

SeagateORGANIZATION

0.99+

2022DATE

0.99+

30%QUANTITY

0.99+

12%QUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

40%QUANTITY

0.99+

25%QUANTITY

0.99+

third showQUANTITY

0.99+

LinkedInORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

GinaPERSON

0.99+

bothQUANTITY

0.99+

EMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

DannyPERSON

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

second dayQUANTITY

0.99+

VeritasORGANIZATION

0.99+

ESGORGANIZATION

0.99+

eachQUANTITY

0.99+

VegasLOCATION

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

two foundersQUANTITY

0.99+

FridayDATE

0.99+

CNBCORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

five plus billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.98+

two plus yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

NSAORGANIZATION

0.98+

20 plus percentQUANTITY

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.97+

25 strategic vendor partnersQUANTITY

0.97+

VemoLOCATION

0.97+

Jason buffPERSON

0.97+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.96+

Valencia, SpainLOCATION

0.95+

30 plusQUANTITY

0.94+

PetiaPERSON

0.94+

firstQUANTITY

0.94+

VEORGANIZATION

0.94+

VeeamPERSON

0.93+

PLGORGANIZATION

0.93+

KubernetesTITLE

0.92+

VemaORGANIZATION

0.9+

Rubrik RubicORGANIZATION

0.9+

yearsDATE

0.9+

wikibon.comOTHER

0.89+

cube.netOTHER

0.89+

KuoORGANIZATION

0.87+

VeeamONORGANIZATION

0.87+

VEON 2022ORGANIZATION

0.87+

each yearQUANTITY

0.86+

VMFSORGANIZATION

0.86+

singlesQUANTITY

0.85+

first placeQUANTITY

0.85+

todayDATE

0.81+

Dave Russell, Veeam | VeeamON 2022


 

>>The cube is back at Vemo 2022. I was happy to be live. Dave ante, Dave Nicholson and Dave Russell three Daves. Dave is the vice president of enterprise strategy at Veeam. Great to see you again, my friend. Thanks for coming >>On. Uh, it's always a pleasure. And Dave, I can remember your name. I can't remember >>Your name as well. <laugh> so wow. How many years has it been now? I mean, add on COVID is four years now. >>Yeah, well, three, three solid three. Yeah, Fallon blue. Uh, last year, Miami little secret. We're gonna go there again next year. >>Okay, so you joined Veeam >>Three. Oh, me four. Yeah, >>Yeah, yeah. Four is four, right? Okay. Wow. >>Um, time flies, man. >>Interesting. What your background, former analyst analyze your time at Veeam and the market and the changes in the customer base. What, what have you seen? What are the big takeaways? Learnings? >>Yeah. You know, what's amazing to me is we've done a lot more research now, ourselves, right? So things that we intuitively thought, things that we experienced by talking to customers, and of course our partners, we can now actually prove. So what I love is that we take the exact same product and we go down market up market. We go across geographies, we go different verticals and we can sell that same exact product to all constituencies because the differences between them are not that great. If it was the three Dave company or the 3m company, what you're looking for is reliable recovery, ease of use those things just transcend. And I think there used to be a time when we thought enterprise means something very different than mid-market than does SMB. And certainly your go to market plans are that way, but not the product plans. >>So the ransomware study, we had Jay buff on earlier, we were talking about it and we just barely scratched the surface. But how were you able to get people to converse with you in such detail? Was it, are you using phone surveys? Are you, are, are you doing web surveys? Are you doing a combination? Deep >>Dives? Yeah. So it was web based and it was anonymous on both ends, meaning no one knew VE was asking the questions. And also we made the promise that none of your data is ever gonna get out, not even to say a large petroleum company, right. Everything is completely anonymized. And we were able to screen people out very effectively, a lot of screener questions to make sure we're dealing with the right person. And then we do some data integrity checking on the back end. But it's amazing if you give people an opportunity, they're actually very willing to tell you about their experience as long as there's no sort of ramification about putting the company or themselves at risk. >>So when I was at IDC, we did a lot of surveys, tons of surveys. I'm sure you did a lot of surveys at Gartner. And we would look at vendor surveys like, eh, well, this kind of the questions are rigged or it's really self-serving. I don't sense that in your surveys, you you've, you've always, you've still got that independent analyst gene. Is that, I mean, it's gotta be, is it by design? Is it just happen that ransomware is a topic that just sort of lends itself to that. Maybe you could talk about your philosophy there. >>Yeah. Well, two part answer really, because it's definitely by design. We, we really want the information. I mean, we're using this to fuel or inform our understanding of the market, what we should build next, what we should message next. So we really want the right data. So we gotta ask the right questions. So Jason, our colleague, Julie, myself, we work really hard on trying to make sure we're not leading the witness down a certain path. We're not trying to prove our own thesis. We're trying to understand what the market really is thinking. And when it comes to ransomware, we wanna know what we don't know, meaning we found a few surprises along the way. A lot of it was confirmational, but that's okay too. As long as you can back that up, cuz then it's not just Avenger's opinion. Of course, a vendor that says that they can help you do something has data that says, they think you uni have a problem with this, but now we can actually point to it and have a more interesting kind of partnership conversation about if you are like 1000 other enterprises globally, this may be what you're seeing. >>And there are no wrong answers there. Meaning even if they say that is absolutely not what we're seeing. Great. Let's have that conversation that's specific to you. But if you're not sure where to start, we've got a whole pool of data to help guide that conversation. >>Yeah. Shout out to Julie Webb does a great job. She's a real pro and yes. And, and really makes sure that, like you say, you want the real, real answers. So what were some of the things that you were excited about or to learn about? Um, in the survey again, we, we touched just barely touched on it in 15 minutes with Jason, but what, what's your take? Well, >>Two that I'd love to point out. I mean, unfortunately Jason probably mentioned this one, you know, only 19% answered when we said, did you pay the ransom? And only 19% said, no, I didn't pay the ransom. And I was a hundred percent successful in my recovery. You know, we're in Vegas, one out of five odds. That's not good. Right? That's a go out of business spot. That's not the kind of 80 20 you want to hear. That's not exactly exactly. Now more concerning to me is 5% said no ransom was asked for. And you know, my phrase on that is that's, that's an arson event. It's not an extortion event. Right. I just came to do harm. That's really troubling. Now there's a huge percentage there that said we paid the ransom about 24% said we paid the ransom and we still couldn't restore the data. So if you add up that 24 in that five, that 29%, that was really scary to me. >>Yeah. So you had the 19%. Okay. That's scary enough. But then you had the wrecking ball, right? Ah, we're just gonna, it's like the mayhem commercial. Yes. Yeah. See ya. Right. Okay. So <laugh>, that's, that's wild. So we've heard a lot about, um, ransomware. The thing that interests me is, and we've had a big dose of ransomware as analysts in these last, you know, 12, 18 months and more. But, but, but it's really escalated. Yeah. Seems like, and by the way, you're sharing this data, which is amazing. Right. So I actually want to dig in and steal some of the, the data. I think that's cool. Right? Definitely. You gave us a URL this morning. Um, so, but you, your philosophy is to share the data. So everybody sees it, your customers, your prospects, your competitors, but your philosophy is to why, why are you sharing that data? Why don't you just keep it to yourself and do it quietly with customers? >>Yeah. You know, I think this is such a significant event. No one vendor's gonna solve it all. Realistically, we may be tied for number one in market share statistically speaking, but we have 12.5%. Right. So we're not gonna be able to do greater good if we're keeping that to ourselves. And it's really a notion of this awareness level, just having the conversation and having that more open, even if it's not us, I think is gonna be beneficial. It speaks to the value of backup and why backup is still relevant this day and age. >>I dunno if you're comfortable answering this, but I'll ask anyway, when you were a Gartner analyst, did you get asked about ransomware a lot? >>No. >>Very rarely or never. >>Almost never. Yeah. And that was four years ago. Literally. Like it >>Was a thing back then, right? I mean it wasn't of course prominent, but it was, it was, I guess it wasn't that >>20 16, 20 17, you know, it's, it's interesting because at a couple of levels you have the, um, the willingness of participants to share their stories, which is a classic example of people coming together to fight a common fo. Yeah, yeah. Right. In the best of times, that's what happens. And now you're sharing that information out. One of the reasons why some would argue we've gotten to this place is because day zero exploits have been stockpiled and they haven't been shared. So you go to, you know, you go, you go through the lineage that gets you to not pet cat as an example. Yes. And where did it come from? Hey, it was something that we knew about. Uh, but we didn't share it. Right. We waited until it happened because maybe we thought we could use it in, in some way. It's, it's an, it's an interesting philosophical question. I, I don't know. I don't know. I don't know where, if that's, uh, the third, it's the one, the third rail you don't want to touch, but basically we're, we are, I guess we're just left to sort through whatever, whatever we have to sort through in that regard. But it is interesting left to industry's own devices. It's sharing an openness. >>Yeah. You know, it's, I almost think it's like open source code. Right? I mean, the promise there is together, we can all do something better. And I think that's true with this ransomware research and the rest of the research we do too. We we've freely put it out there. I mean, you can download the link, no problem. Right. And go see the report. We're fine with that. You know, we think it actually is very beneficial. I remember a long time ago, it was actually Sam Adams that said, uh, you know, Hey, there's a lot of craft brewers out there now, you know, is, are you as a craft brewery now? Successful? Are you worried about that? No. We want every craft brewery to be successful because it creates a better awareness. Well, an availability market, it's still Boston reference. >>What did another Boston reference? Yes. Thank you, >>Boston. And what <laugh>. >>Yeah. So, you know, I, I, I feel like we've seen these milestone, you know, watershed events in, in security. I mean, stucks net sort of yeah. Informed us what's possible with nation states, even though it's highly likely that us and Israel were, were behind that, uh, the, the solar winds hack people are still worried about. Yes. Okay. What's next. Even, even something now. And so everybody's now on high alert even, I don't know how close you guys followed it, but the, the, uh, the Okta, uh, uh, breach, which was a fairly benign incident. And technically it was, was very, very limited and very narrow in scope. But CISOs that I talked to were like, we are really paranoid that there's another shoe to drop. What do we do? So the, the awareness is way, way off the charts. It begs the question. What's next. Can you, can you envision, can you stay ahead? It's so hard to stay ahead of the bad guys, but, but how are you thinking about that? What this isn't the end of it from your standpoint? >>No, it's not. And unfortunately it's because there's money to be made, right? And the barrier to entry is relatively low. It's like hiring a Hitman. You know, you don't actually have to even carry out the bad act yourself and get your own hands dirty. And so it's not gonna end, but it it's really security is everyone's responsibility. Veeam is not really a full time security company, but we play a role in that whole ecosystem. And even if you're not in the data center as an employee of a company, you have a role to play in security. You know, don't click that link, lock the door behind you, that type of thing. So how do you stay ahead of it? I think you just continually keep putting a focus on it. It's like performance. You're never gonna be done. There's always something to tune and to work on, but that can be overwhelming. So the positive I try to tell someone is to your point, Dave, look, a lot of these vulnerabilities were known for quite some time. If you were just current on your patch levels, this could have been prevented, right? You could have closed that window. So the thing that I often say is if you can't do everything and probably none of us can do something and then repeat, do it again, try to get a little bit better every period of time. Whether that's every day, every quarter, what case may be, do what you can. >>Yeah. So ransomware obviously very lucrative. So your job is to increase the denominator. So the ROI is lower, right? And that's a, that's a constant game, right? >>Absolutely. It is a crime of opportunity. It's indiscriminate. And oftentimes non-targeted now there are state sponsored events to your point, but largely it's like the fishermen casting the net out into the ocean. No idea with certainty, what's gonna come back. So I'm just gonna keep trying and trying and trying our goal is to basically you wanna be the house on the neighborhood that looks the least inviting. >>We've talked about this. I mean, any, anyone can be a, a, a ransomware as to go in the dark web, ransomware's a service. Oh, I gotta, I can put a stick into a server and a way I go and I get some Bitcoin right. For it. So, so that's, so, so organizations really have to take this seriously. I think they are. Um, well you tell me, I mean, in your discussions with, with, with customers, >>It's changed. Yeah. You know, I would say 18 months ago, there was a subset of customers out there saying vendors, crying Wolf, you know, you're trying to scare us into making a purchase decision or move off of something that we're working with. Now. I think that's almost inverted. Now what we see is people are saying, look, my boss or my boss's boss's boss, and the security team are knocking on my door asking, what are we gonna do? What's our response? You know, how prepared are we? What kind of things do we have in place? What does our backup practice do to support ransomware? The good news though, going back to the awareness side is I feel like we're evangelizing this a little less as an industry. Meaning the security team is well aware of the role that proper backup and availability can play. That was not true. A handful of years ago. >>Well, that's the other thing too, is that your study showed the closer the practitioner was to the problem. Yes. The more problems there were, that's an awareness thing. Yes. That's not a, that's not, oh, just those guys had visibility. I wanna ask you cuz you've You understand from an application view, right. There's only so much Veeam can do. Um, and then the customer has to have processes in place that go beyond just the, the backup and recovery technology. So, so from an application perspective, what are you advising customers where you leave off and they really have to take over this notion of shared responsibility is really extending beyond cloud security. >>Yeah. Uh, the model that I like is interestingly enough, what we see with Caston in the Kubernetes space. Mm-hmm <affirmative> is there, we're selling into two different constituencies, potentially. It's the infrastructure team that they're worried about disaster recovery. They're worried about backup, but it's the app dev DevOps team. Hey, we're worried about creating the application. So we're spending a lot of focus with the casting group to say, great, go after that shift, left crowd, talk to them about a data availability, disaster recovery, by the way you get data movement or migration for free with that. So migration, maybe what you're first interested in on day one. But by doing that, by having this kind of capability, you're actually protecting yourself from day two issues as well. >>Yeah. So Let's see. Um, what haven't we hit on in this study? There was so much data in there. Uh, is that URL, is that some, a private thing that you guys shared >>Or is it no. Absolutely. >>Can, can you share the >>URL? Yeah, absolutely. It's V E E so V two E period am so V with the period between the E and the a forward slash RW 22. So ransomware 22 is the research project. >>So go there, you download the zip file, you get all the graphics. Um, I I'm gonna dig into it, uh, maybe as early as this, this Friday or this weekend, like to sort of expose that, uh it's you guys obviously want this, I think you're right. It's it's it's awareness needs to go up to solve this problem. You know, I don't know if it's ever solvable, but the only approach is to collaborate. Right. So I, I dunno if you're gonna collaborate with your head-to-head competitors, but you're certainly happy to share the data I've seen Dave, some competitors have pivoted from data protection or even data management to security. Yes. I see. I wonder if I could run a premise by, I see that as an adjacency to your business, but not sort of throwing you into the security bucket. What are your thoughts on that? >>Yeah. You know, certainly respect everything other competitors are doing, you know, and some are getting very, you know, making some good noise and getting picked up on that. However, we're unapologetically a backup company. Mm-hmm, <affirmative>, we're a backup company. First. We're worried about security. We're worried about, you know, data reuse and supporting shift, left types of things, but we're not gonna apologize for being in the backup availability business, not, not at all. However, there's a role that we can play. Having said that that we're a role. We're a component. If you're in the secondary storage market, like backup or archiving. And you're trying to imply that you're going to help prevent or even head off issues on the primary storage side. That might be a little bit of a stretch. Now, hopefully that can happen that we can go get better as an industry on that. >>But fundamentally we're about ensuring that you're recoverable with reliability and speed when you need it. Whether we're no matter what the issue is, because we like to say ransomware is a disaster. Unfortunately there's other kind of disasters that happen as well. Power failures still happen. Natural issues still occur, et cetera. So all these things have to be accounted for. You know, one of our survey, um, data points basically said all the things that take down a server that you didn't plan on. It's basically humans at the top human error, someone accidentally deleted something and then malicious humans, someone actually came after you, but there's a dozen other things that happened too. So you've gotta prepare for all of that. So I guess what I would end up with saying is you remember back in the centralized data centers, especially the mainframe days, people would say, we're worried about the smoking hole or the smoking crater event. Yeah. Yeah. The probability of a plane crashing into your data bunker was relatively low. That was when it got all the discussion though, what was happening every single day is somebody accidentally deleted a file. And so you need to account on both ends of the spectrum. So we don't wanna over rotate. And we also, we don't want to signal to 450,000 beam customers around the world that we're abandoning you that were not about backup. That's still our core >>Effort. No, it's pretty straightforward. You're just telling people to back up in a way that gives them a certain amount of mitigation yes. Or protection in the event that something happens. And no, I don't remember anything about mainframe. He does though though, much older than me >>EF SMS. So I even know what it stands for. Count key data don't even get me started. So, and, and it wasn't thank you for that answer. I didn't mean to sort of a set up question, but it was more of a strategy question and I wish wish I could put on your analyst hat because I, I feel, I'll just say it. I feel as though it's a move to try to get a tailwind. Maybe it's a valuation play. I don't know. But I, I, it resonated with me three years ago when everybody was talking data management and nobody knew what that meant. Data management. I'm like Oracle. >>Right. >>And now it's starting to become a little bit more clear. Um, but Danny Allen stuff and said, it's all about the backup. I think that was one of his keynote messages. So that really resonated with me cuz he said, yeah, it starts with backup and recovery. And that's what, what matters most to these customers. So really was a strategy question. Now maybe it does have valuation impact. Maybe there's a big market there that can be consolidated. You know, uh, we, this morning in the analyst session, we heard about your new CEO's objectives of, you know, grabbing more market share. So, and that's, that's an adjacency. So it's gonna be interesting to see how that plays out far too many security vendors. As, as we know, the backup and recovery space is getting more crowded and that is maybe causing people to sort of shift. I don't know, whatever right. Or left, I guess, shift. Right. I'm not sure, but um, it's gonna be really interesting to watch because this has now become a really hot space after, you know, it's been some really interesting momentum in certain pockets, but now it's everywhere it's coming ubiquitous. So I'll give you the last word Dave on, uh, day one, VEON 20, 22. >>Yeah. Well boy, so many things I could say to kind of land the plane on, but we're just glad to be back in person. It's been three years since we've had a live event in those three years, we've gone from 300,000 customers to 450,000 customers. The release cadence, even in the pandemic has been the greatest in the company's history in 2020, 2021, there's only about three dozen software only companies that have hit a billion dollars and we're one of them. And that, you know, that mission is why hasn't changed and that's why we wanna stay consistent. One of the things Danny always likes to say is, you know, we keep telling the same story because we're not wanting to deviate off of that story and there's more work to be done. And to honors point, you know, Hey, if you have ambitious goals, you're gonna have to look at spreading your wings out a little bit wider, but we're never gonna abandon being a backup. Well, >>It's, it's clear to me, Dave on was not brought in to keep you steady at a billion. I think he's got a site set on five and then who knows what's next? Dave Russell, thanks so much for coming back in the cube. Great to >>See always a pleasure. Thank you. >>All right. That's a wrap for Dave one. Dave ante and Dave Nicholson will be backed tomorrow with a full day of coverage. Check out Silicon angle.com for all the news, uh, youtube.com/silicon angle. You can get these videos. They're all, you know, flying up Wiki bond.com for some of the research in this space. We'll see you tomorrow.

Published Date : May 18 2022

SUMMARY :

Great to see you again, my friend. And Dave, I can remember your name. I mean, We're gonna go there again next year. Yeah, Four is four, right? What, what have you seen? And I think there used to be a time when we thought enterprise means something very different than mid-market So the ransomware study, we had Jay buff on earlier, we were talking about it and we just barely scratched a lot of screener questions to make sure we're dealing with the right person. Maybe you could talk about your philosophy there. kind of partnership conversation about if you are like 1000 other enterprises globally, Let's have that conversation that's specific to you. So what were some of the things that you were excited about or to learn about? That's not the kind of 80 20 you want to hear. ransomware as analysts in these last, you know, 12, 18 months So we're not gonna be able to do greater good if Like it I don't know where, if that's, uh, the third, it's the one, the third rail you don't want to touch, I mean, you can download the link, What did another Boston reference? And what <laugh>. And so everybody's now on high alert even, I don't know how close you guys followed it, but the, the, So the thing that I often say is if you can't do everything and probably none of us can do So the ROI is lower, right? And oftentimes non-targeted now there are state sponsored events to your point, but largely it's I mean, any, anyone can be a, a, a ransomware as to go in the dark customers out there saying vendors, crying Wolf, you know, you're trying to scare us into making a purchase decision or I wanna ask you cuz you've You availability, disaster recovery, by the way you get data movement or migration for free a private thing that you guys shared So ransomware 22 is the research project. like to sort of expose that, uh it's you guys obviously want this, I think you're right. and some are getting very, you know, making some good noise and getting picked up on that. So I guess what I would end up with saying is you remember back Or protection in the event that I didn't mean to sort of a set up question, but it was more of a strategy question and I wish wish So I'll give you the last word Dave One of the things Danny always likes to say is, you know, we keep telling the same story because we're It's, it's clear to me, Dave on was not brought in to keep you steady at a billion. See always a pleasure. They're all, you know,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JasonPERSON

0.99+

JuliePERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Dave NicholsonPERSON

0.99+

Julie WebbPERSON

0.99+

Dave RussellPERSON

0.99+

Sam AdamsPERSON

0.99+

12.5%QUANTITY

0.99+

VegasLOCATION

0.99+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.99+

2020DATE

0.99+

Danny AllenPERSON

0.99+

5%QUANTITY

0.99+

29%QUANTITY

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

19%QUANTITY

0.99+

24QUANTITY

0.99+

12QUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

450,000 customersQUANTITY

0.99+

two partQUANTITY

0.99+

300,000 customersQUANTITY

0.99+

VeeamORGANIZATION

0.99+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

five oddsQUANTITY

0.99+

hundred percentQUANTITY

0.99+

15 minutesQUANTITY

0.99+

fourQUANTITY

0.99+

DannyPERSON

0.99+

18 monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

firstQUANTITY

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

fiveQUANTITY

0.99+

TwoQUANTITY

0.99+

four yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

18 months agoDATE

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

four years agoDATE

0.98+

OneQUANTITY

0.98+

2021DATE

0.98+

both endsQUANTITY

0.97+

MiamiLOCATION

0.97+

three years agoDATE

0.97+

about 24%QUANTITY

0.97+

FourQUANTITY

0.97+

Jay buffPERSON

0.97+

day oneQUANTITY

0.96+

thirdQUANTITY

0.95+

IDCORGANIZATION

0.95+

1000 other enterprisesQUANTITY

0.95+

IsraelORGANIZATION

0.94+

day twoQUANTITY

0.94+

about three dozen softwareQUANTITY

0.94+

pandemicEVENT

0.93+

ThreeQUANTITY

0.92+

this morningDATE

0.92+

Dave antePERSON

0.92+

3mQUANTITY

0.91+

this FridayDATE

0.91+

a dozen other thingsQUANTITY

0.9+

this weekendDATE

0.89+

450,000 beam customersQUANTITY

0.88+

Wiki bond.comOTHER

0.85+

AvengerORGANIZATION

0.84+

Breaking Analysis: CIOs & CISOs Discuss COVID 19 Budget Impact


 

from the cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world this is a cube conversation CIOs and CISOs of industries that have been hard hit see significant near term and many permanent shifts to their IT and security strategies this was the consensus of four technology executives at leading companies that are feeling the brunt of the corona virus pandemic welcome to this week's cube insights powered by ETR my name is Dave Volante and in this breaking analysis we want to accomplish three things first we want to tap into a new piece of research from ETR it involves an intimate focus group like set up via an open discussion with leading technology executives we interviewed Eric Bradley the managing director of et ours then program and we'll bring him into this discussion the next thing we want to do is we want to drill in to the various sector commentaries from the four leaders third we're gonna comment an hour take try to add some color and then share with you some of the specific vendor commentary that was called out by the executives let's start by looking at what et our event is et our van is a roundtable discussion it applies a tried-and-true methodology similar to a focus group or in-depth interviews what we sometimes in the research business call ID is ETR invites execs in from its community to participate in a private but open conversation et our clients get to listen in the names of the execs and their companies are transparent but the cube is only allowed to refer to them generically as shown on this slide now we can validate these participants they are legit CIOs and CISOs some and very well-known firms now what I want to do is summarize the CIO and seaso sentiment from this then discussion the overall budget impact for these four organizations is very very severe essentially large project projects are being put on hold although digital transformation initiatives remain a priority there were really four significant areas of emphasis that were cited by these execs cloud-first on-prem is losing out to cloud SAS and of course remote access solutions in fact the best comment on the panel was as a service is saving our SAS traditional networking is shifting to SD win especially rigid MPLS networks securing endpoints and zero trust solutions are the winners and there are a number of vendors rising to the occasion that will talk about it let's see how Eric Bradley of ETR summarizes the venn to summarize what we're seeing here was the real winners and losers are clear not everyone was prepared to have it work from home strategy not everyone was prepared to send their workers out there VPN wasn't didn't have enough bandwidth so there was a real quick uptick in spending but longer-term we're starting to see that these changes will be become more permanent so the real winners and losers right now we're going to see on the losers side traditional networking the MPLS networking isn't a lot of trouble according to all the data and the commentary that we see it's expensive it's difficult to ramp up bandwidth as quickly as you need and it doesn't support remote ok what I want to do now is I want to take a look at some of the verbatim comments and I'll just I'll read them from this slide all spending is shut down 70% of big projects are cut all next-gen projects have been shelled the relationship with our SAS vendor has been a miracle we're accelerating from MPLS to sd when on top of secure gateway technologies these will win this was interesting our business continuity plans were way too DR focused essentially we weren't prepared now let's unpack the cloud first commentary and give you some additional color I feel like all we do around here sometimes is talk about the cloud but it's clear from the data in the ETR data set surveys and the venn that in other data from the cube that that the cloud is only going to be accelerated we said this in 2008 in the 2009 downturns have been good to cloud one of the execs literally said I would like to see my data centers completely deleted Wow let's listen to Erik Bradley's take on this comment I was also shocked about that comment that gentleman also stated that his executives outside of the eyeteeth area the CEO the CFO had never ever ever wanted to discuss cloud they did not want to discuss work from home they did not want to discuss remote access he said that conversation has changed immediately so we've been talking a lot about those aspects of people and process and technology that might be permanent post kovat and clearly you see c-level execs as having a bit of an awakening for things like cloud and work from home not that they didn't see them before but these things are gonna accelerate in our view I want to spend a minute talking about networks SAS and bring cloud again into the discussion I gotta say the panel members really trashed MPLS networks in a big way let me explain MPLS stands for multi-protocol label switching you find this type of infrastructure in big telecom networks and it's there to route traffic and pls is used to create dedicated and and essentially reliable connections it enables things like VPNs quality a service management traffic engineering or shaping but well MPLS is definitely cheaper than t1 it's more expensive than Ethernet now I came into prominence well before the cloud and these execs see it is as outdated and inflexible and this is where SD wind comes into play software-defined wide area networks they're gaining popularity especially with the Sassa fication of applications and of course the general trend toward cloud here's Eric Bradley again explaining what the panel members said from his perspectives winners there or in the SD web space it's gonna be impossible to ignore that going forward and some of our CIO and even CISO panelists said that change will be also we're seeing at the same time what they were calling a on on SAS and cloud now we know these trends obviously were already happening but there be they're being exacerbated they're happening even more quickly and more strong and I don't see that changing anytime soon that of course is at the expense of network sorry data centers whether it be your own or hosted which has huge ramifications on from on from Hardware even the firewall providers so and it really seems as if as networking refresh starts to come up and it's coming up with a lot of large in writes when your network refresh comes up people are going to do an RFP for SD web they are sick and tired of paying MPLS network vendors and they really want to look at something else that was even prior to this situation now what we're hearing is this is a permanent change I particularly had one person say I wanted to find this quote real quickly by then but basically they were basically saying that from a permanency perspective the freedom from MPLS will reduce our network spend by over half while more than doubling or tripling or bandwidth now the challenge of course is customers have multiple MPLS contracts with several different vendors and often they just rubber-stamp the renewal but what customers are gonna start doing is layering in SD win and letting those agreements expire ok I want to talk about secure endpoints in this notion of zero trust solutions as I've said in the cube many many times the idea of digging a moat around the castle doesn't protect your queen anymore because the Queen ie the data has left the castle so companies that can secure gateways and secure endpoints they are going to have more momentum during and post kovat now in the panel Z scalar came up a lot in this context as well as fortunate who as I've reported has done a good job in getting its cloud products to market and of course the et our data shows that fortunate and Z scalar both have strong net scores or spending momentum and fort net especially has really strong pervasiveness in the et our dataset as I've reported previously I've also analyzed that there's been evaluation divergence between Palo Alto Networks and fortunate and house II scalar as well is a disruptor in this space I want you to listen to what Eric Bradley said specifically about Z scalar in Palo Alto Networks roll the clip yes it is and I'm glad you brought up Z scalar to very recently by client request we did a very in-depth research on Z scale and versus Palo Alto charisma access and they were very interested this is before all this happened you know does Palo Alto have a chance of catching up taking share from Z scalar and I've had the pleasure myself personally hosting J the CEO of Z scalar at an event here at City and I have nothing but incredible respect for the company but what we found out through this research is Z scalar at the moment their technology is still ahead according to their and there is no doubt however there doesn't seem to be any real secret sauce that will stop palo alto from inching up so if I had to choose that in a year from now Palo Alto might have had a better chance so in this panel as you brought up Z scalar was mentioned numerous times as just the wave of the future along with Cosby brokers right whether you're talking about a net scope or a force point they're all those people that also play in The Cosby space to secure your access zero Trust is no longer a marketing hype term it is real and it is becoming more real by the week now I personally agree with Eric that palo alto is is definitely going to be in the mix customers that we've talked to they want to work with palo alto networks but there's a sea change going on and it's being driven by sass and cloud and now accelerating because a co vid of course that the trend of remote workers is we think here to stay now i want to end by talking about some specific vendor mentions in addition to the ones we've talked about already and this chart shows some of the vendors and their logos that were called out as either being really really helpful during the this pandemic or super important to the CIOs and CISOs these executives really stressed how thankful they are to these companies and that the fact that these companies have worked very closely with them they've been flexible on pricing and payments and they also specifically mentioned how off-put they were by you know this notion of ambulance-chasing for example trials that required them to make some kind of commitment or swipe a credit card they just don't have time for that right now and then of the patience for it now let me call out a few of the companies that were cited in a positive light look at microsoft is all for the ETR data set in so many sectors Microsoft teams security solutions cloud really came up a lot on on this ven IBM was mentioned as being a great partner as what's oracle many many times we talked about fortunate and Z scalar already Cisco was called out as a strategic vendor was very helpful both the networking and with Cisco teams for collaboration CrowdStrike came up a number of times from CISOs as did Trend Micro and carbon black got a mention that's the VMware acquisition insecurity of course MobileIron that makes sense as well because they're securing and managing remote worker devices now finally interesting Lee Salesforce was brought up many times as a critical vendor one exec said that before coronavirus multiple workers could share a Salesforce license by you know sharing passwords but with the spike and work from home they had to purchase more licenses now one last thing that I want to bring up is start ups I got this question the other day from a client who said how a start-ups fair you might think that in this climate especially among for hard-hit customers that there might be risk-averse as it pertains to using startups once cio however said the following paraphrasing you always hear about the guy that says we'll pick three companies in the upper right hand corner the Gartner Magic Quadrant will test them out and this C so said that one of the things that he's always done is picked two from the upper right and one from the lower left one of the emerging techs and he gives them a shot let's listen to how Eric Bradley describes this dynamic roll the clip it's a great comment and honestly if you're in charge of procurement you'd be stupid not to do that not only just to see what the technology is but now I can play you off the big guys because I have negotiating leverage and I could say oh well I could always just take their contract so it's silly not to do it from a business perspective so it's really interesting and somewhat non-intuitive these comments on startups which of course means despite all the consolidation and acquisitions that you see in the industry you know there's still gonna be a lot of fragmentations a fragmentation especially as I've said many many times in the security space people still want best to breed and innovation and if it can drive business value they're gonna they're gonna go for it ok so look I realize that these are narrow comments from for CIOs and CISOs but they give us some added texture and flavor and color to the core ETR data set and we're going to continue to report on these trends and share more details as they become available both from the ETR data set and from other vents and remember we're gonna be digging into the latest ETR survey over the over the coming weeks as ETR exits its self-imposed quiet period so you can always check out ETR dot plus I publish weekly on wiki bang calm and on Silicon angle calm and of course our YouTube library has all these videos that's youtube.com slash silicon angle by the way these segments are also available as podcasts you can DM me or tweet me at devil ante and please by all means comment on my LinkedIn posts or email me at David Galante at Silicon angle com always appreciate the feedback thanks for watching everybody this is breaking analysis brought to you by the cube powered by ETR this is Dave Volante and we'll see you next time thanks for watching [Music]

Published Date : Apr 17 2020

SUMMARY :

that the cloud is only going to be

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Eric BradleyPERSON

0.99+

Dave VolantePERSON

0.99+

2008DATE

0.99+

Erik BradleyPERSON

0.99+

Eric BradleyPERSON

0.99+

David GalantePERSON

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

2009DATE

0.99+

Palo AltoLOCATION

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

EricPERSON

0.99+

ETRORGANIZATION

0.99+

microsoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

CosbyORGANIZATION

0.99+

palo altoORGANIZATION

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

BostonLOCATION

0.99+

Palo Alto NetworksORGANIZATION

0.99+

three companiesQUANTITY

0.98+

Trend MicroORGANIZATION

0.98+

first commentaryQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

Palo Alto NetworksORGANIZATION

0.98+

four leadersQUANTITY

0.97+

Z scalarTITLE

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.96+

Palo AltoORGANIZATION

0.96+

one last thingQUANTITY

0.96+

one personQUANTITY

0.95+

firstQUANTITY

0.95+

JPERSON

0.95+

this weekDATE

0.94+

Z scalarTITLE

0.93+

pandemicEVENT

0.92+

PaloORGANIZATION

0.92+

an hourQUANTITY

0.91+

GartnerORGANIZATION

0.91+

over halfQUANTITY

0.91+

thirdQUANTITY

0.91+

AltoORGANIZATION

0.9+

three thingsQUANTITY

0.9+

LinkedInORGANIZATION

0.9+

youtube.comORGANIZATION

0.87+

carbon blackORGANIZATION

0.86+

corona virus pandemicEVENT

0.86+

ZORGANIZATION

0.86+

a minuteQUANTITY

0.86+

four technology executivesQUANTITY

0.84+

SalesforceTITLE

0.83+

one ofQUANTITY

0.81+

waveEVENT

0.8+

futureEVENT

0.79+

Silicon angle comORGANIZATION

0.78+

Lee SalesforcePERSON

0.78+

thingsQUANTITY

0.77+

coronavirusTITLE

0.76+

a yearQUANTITY

0.75+

CEOPERSON

0.75+

CFOPERSON

0.7+

MobileIronTITLE

0.7+

many timesQUANTITY

0.68+

Silicon angleORGANIZATION

0.67+

more than doublingQUANTITY

0.64+

zeroQUANTITY

0.64+

SASORGANIZATION

0.62+

four organizationsQUANTITY

0.62+

QueenPERSON

0.61+

ZTITLE

0.6+

zero trustQUANTITY

0.6+

devil antePERSON

0.59+

scalarTITLE

0.58+

wikiTITLE

0.57+

Magic QuadrantCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.55+

Bruce Chizen, Informatica | Informatica World 2019


 

(funky music) >> Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE, covering Informatica World 2019. Brought to you by Informatica. >> Hey, welcome back everyone, this is theCUBE's live coverage here in Las Vegas for Informatica World 2019. I'm John Furrier, your host, with Rebecca Knight who's on the floor getting some data, getting some reports. She's my co-host here this week. Next guest is Bruce Chizen, board member of Informatica, OG, original gangster of the tech scene. Been there, done that. Welcome back to theCUBE, great to see you. >> Yeah, great to see you, John. >> Big alumni. I love having you on because you're kind of, you're a historian through experience, still active in the industry, obviously, Informatica. Four years private. >> Historian, that's scary. >> You've been around the block. You've seen more waves than I have, and that's a lot. But, you know, you've done a lot of things and you've seen the waves. You've run companies, you've been on boards. You've been on Informatica board. Four years private, a lot of great things can go on. Michael Dell proved that. He took Dell Computer, which is now Dell Technologies, he took it private, and I asked him. He wanted to retool and didn't want to do the shot clock of being a public company. Filing, and sour beans and all those regulations, 'cause he knew what was coming, the wave was coming. Informatica did the same thing, so I'm expecting an IPO, or MNA big deal happening. But four years, with great product people, you're on the board. Data, our original conversation four years ago on theCUBE, hasn't changed. >> No. It's the same wave, and now everyone's jumping on the wave. >> The good thing for Informatica is, as a private company, we got to do things that we could not have done as a public company. The level of investment we made in R&D, the transition from perpetual, or on-premise, to subscription. The investment in the sales organization. Couldn't have done that as a public company 'cause the shareholders tend to be too short term focused. >> And also I will add, just to get your reaction to, is that, my observation, looking at these situations when you have smart people, the board, like yourself, and the product team. Which I've been complimentary of Informatica's, as you know. Some other critical analysis, but that's different. But, great product engineering people. When you don't have the pressure of time, you could watch things gestate and when you're early, you have an advantage. Talk about that, because that's a strategic thing, most people aren't talking about, but you an early lead on data. You've had product engineering leadership, and you had time. >> It's not as easy as you make it sound. Keep in mind, Informatica is owned by financial sponsors. Private equity. >> Yeah, there's some pressure. >> CPP. And it's up to people like myself on the board, the other independent board member, the management team, to continue to remind the investors that if we make early investments and they pay off the company will be worth more and they'll ultimately make more money and their partners will make more money. >> I made it sound like you're on the beach drinking wine. >> A great example is what Informatica did with the data catalog. That was an early investment. No one really knew whether it would pan out. Sounded good, but it required a significant investment, that came out of the pockets of our investors and we were able to convince them to do that. Another great example is CLAIRE. You know, AI is hot. Well had we not invested in CLAIRE, three, three and a half years ago, CLAIRE would not be in existence today. Couldn't have done that as a public company. >> And it gives you a little bit of a lead, again, there's just no shot clock on public. But yeah, the private executives, they're not going to let you sit around and hit the beach and clip coupons. You got to work hard. But I got to ask >> The other thing you've seen the company has gone from a great point product company, great products, to really developing a platform, and architecting a platform. Which requires a significant amount of engineering. >> I was going to ask you about that, I'm glad you jumped the gun on that. Platform is the key. Speaking of platforms, I was just at Adobe, a company you're very familiar with, they're rolling out a new platform. Platforms are now back in vogue but it's not the old way. The old way was build a platform, have a competitive advantage, lock in your nested solution in imitability. Now it's platform open, different twist. How is that different? 'Cause you've seen the platform where you got to own it, barest entry, proprietary technology, to platform that's open extensible. >> Yeah, customers have gotten smart. No customer wants to be held hostage to one individual platform. SAP being a great example. Microsoft Windows being another example. They want to make sure that if they choose one platform, they could easily migrate to another. It's one of the reasons why Informatica is in such a sweet spot, because we allow our customers to choose which Cloud infrastructure providers they want to put their workloads on. And they can use multiple Cloud infrastructure. >> I got to ask about the competition now. Not competition but co-opetition, just marketplace in general. Everybody's jumping on the same wave that you guys have been on. You go to YouTube.com/Siliconangle look up Informatica videos I've done here with the team and you four years ago. Look up some of the things we were talking about, not a lot of many people talk about data driven, hardcore analytics, next-gen. These are the kind of topics that in AI machine learning, now everyone's talking about them. What's different about Informatica as the noise level increases around some of these things? Certainly, it's pretty obvious AI is going to be hot. Multi-generational Cloud, multi-generational things can happen. Operations, AI automation. >> Yeah. >> But what's different about Informatica? What should people know about Informatica that might be unique that you can lend some insight into? >> So when I think about the competition, or the co-opetition, I put those competitors in two buckets. There's a whole slew of smaller players that have some really good point products. Fortunately for Informatica, they don't have the scale to compete. And when I say scale to compete, not just on the go to market side, but they can't afford to invest two hundred million dollars a year in research and development building a complete platform. So, even though they're kind of ankle biters and occasionally I feel like the company has to slap them around, and they're annoyances, I don't think they're a big threat. The Cloud infrastructure players, the platform guys, Google, AWS, Azure, will continue to provide data tools that are developed for their stack. They will do some things that will be good enough. The good news is Informatica does great as it relates to enterprise Cloud management. So, if an enterprise really cares about their data, and they really care about having choice in the future, and they don't want to be held hostage to any one platform, Informatica is the only game in town. >> You're one of the best at doing theCUBE. This is our tenth year, and I remember telling some NetApp people because they invested in Cloud early, too, they don't get the credit. This is another example of Informatica invested early on in Cloud. I talked to Emmett and Anil years ago, they were well down that Cloud path. So Johnny-come-lately's going to jump on the Cloud 'cause there's an advantage so props to Informatica. >> And plus it's not Cloud only. Most of the large enterprises are hybrid, they will be hybrid for many years to come. In fact, if you look at workloads today, they majority of the workloads are still on-premise. >> Scales come up a lot. You know my commentary and theCUBE, everyone who watches me knows I like to rap about I was the first to call Amazon the trillion dollar opportunity because of the scale. Scale is the new competitive advantage, I've said that. I've said open is the new lock in. Value is the new lock in is what I said. So now you've got scales. The question is how does a startup compete if scale is table stakes? Is it race for funding? Snowflakes got to three billion dollar evaluation. Are they worth three billion? We're going to analyze that in theCUBE later. But they raise almost a billion dollars in cash. Do you scale up with cash and grow? >> Great technology. It starts out with really great technology. An organization like Snowflake, great technology. Look at Databricks, great technology. So, I look at the great new startups, what makes them great is that they have an innovative technological solution that's hard to replicate. Then they get the funding, and they're able to scale. That's what it takes to be a startup. >> And that's almost the OG, original gangster, Vectra Capital model. >> That's correct. >> Agile, iterate your way to success. No craft, no scale. Just speed. Is the world going back to the old formula? >> It's going back to innovation. To technical innovation. Especially given that you have so many scale players. You can no longer just come in there as a startup. Money alone is not going to enable you to be successful. >> All right I want you to pay it forward for all the young people graduating. I just was at my daughter's Cal, Berkeley graduation yesterday. Although she wasn't in this class. Cal just graduated their inaugural first-generation class of data science. Databricks was involved in that, they donated a lot of software. They're very Cal oriented. People who graduate high school, elementary school, this is a new field. Not enough jobs. Berkeley, a leading institution, first class ever in data science. What skill gaps are out there that need to be filled that people could learn now to get ahead and get an advantage in the workforce? >> My view, John, it starts in middle school with math. If we could help our kids who are in middle school to get through algebra, studies have shown they will move on to undergrad and then many of them will move to graduate work. We've got to start early. Yeah, there's some simple fixes. Help people become coders, help people do other things. But the reality is >> If you can't get the algebra done you're not going to code. >> We have to solve the longer term problems. So when I think about jobs of the future, we've got to create people who are creative, but at the same time understand the basics. >> Math, stats, great stuff. Final question. Are you going to run a company again soon? >> So I get that question quite often. First of all, I love doing what I do today, which is kind of a lot of little stuff. I do miss running a company. But, as I've told a whole bunch of people, I have no desire to ever report to a board again. So unless I own 51% of that company, I will not be running a company. >> Well now you know the deal terms, anyone who's watching for an investment from Bruce partnering with them. Great stuff. What's missing? What's around the corner? What are people missing in the news these days in the trends? What's coming that's exciting that nobody's talking about? >> I think what's happening, and this happens each wave, there's been so much excitement about the movement from On-Premises to Cloud, about AI and machine learning, I don't think people really appreciate how early it is. That we're this much in to it and we've got a long ways to go. And the old workflows that are on-premise, the amount of advancement in artificial intelligence and machine learning has so far to go, that people need to be patient and continue to invest aggressively in what's going to transpire ten years from now, not six months from now. And then you add things like 5G, faster speed WiFi, that also is going to have this huge impact. >> Great insight, Bruce. Thanks for sharing that insight. Get the kids learning math in middle school, gateway to coding, gateway to graduate work. Next ten waves, lot of waves coming. Bruce, thanks for sharing the insight. Good to see you again. >> Thanks, John. It's a pleasure. >> CUBE coverage here in Informatica World 2019. I'm John Furrier with theCUBE. Thanks for watching. We'll be back with more after this short break. (funky music)

Published Date : May 21 2019

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Informatica. Welcome back to theCUBE, great to see you. I love having you on because you're kind of, You've been around the block. 'cause the shareholders tend to be too short term focused. and the product team. It's not as easy as you make it sound. the company will be worth more that came out of the pockets of our investors they're not going to let you sit around to really developing a platform, but it's not the old way. they could easily migrate to another. I got to ask about the competition now. not just on the go to market side, I talked to Emmett and Anil years ago, Most of the large enterprises are hybrid, Value is the new lock in is what I said. Then they get the funding, and they're able to scale. And that's almost the OG, original gangster, Is the world going back to the old formula? Money alone is not going to enable you to be successful. and get an advantage in the workforce? We've got to start early. If you can't get the algebra done We have to solve the longer term problems. Are you going to run a company again soon? I have no desire to ever report to a board again. What are people missing in the news these days and machine learning has so far to go, Good to see you again. It's a pleasure. I'm John Furrier with theCUBE.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Rebecca KnightPERSON

0.99+

Bruce ChizenPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

BrucePERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

InformaticaORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

three billionQUANTITY

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

51%QUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

AdobeORGANIZATION

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

CalORGANIZATION

0.99+

tenth yearQUANTITY

0.99+

CLAIREPERSON

0.99+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.99+

two bucketsQUANTITY

0.99+

Vectra CapitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

Dell TechnologiesORGANIZATION

0.99+

four years agoDATE

0.99+

one platformQUANTITY

0.99+

MNAORGANIZATION

0.98+

SnowflakesORGANIZATION

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

SnowflakeORGANIZATION

0.98+

four yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

Four yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

JohnnyPERSON

0.97+

YouTube.com/SiliconangleOTHER

0.97+

Informatica World 2019EVENT

0.96+

threeDATE

0.96+

one individual platformQUANTITY

0.96+

FirstQUANTITY

0.96+

wavesEVENT

0.96+

this weekDATE

0.95+

EmmettPERSON

0.95+

three billion dollarQUANTITY

0.95+

DatabricksORGANIZATION

0.95+

three and a half years agoDATE

0.95+

AnilPERSON

0.94+

two hundred million dollars a yearQUANTITY

0.93+

CloudTITLE

0.91+

first classQUANTITY

0.91+

eachQUANTITY

0.9+

first-generationQUANTITY

0.9+

AzureORGANIZATION

0.86+

WindowsTITLE

0.83+

waveEVENT

0.8+

almost a billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.8+

Omar Bham, Crypt0 | Blockchain Week NYC 2018


 

>> Announcer: From New York, it's The Cube! Covering Blockchain Week. Now here's John Furrier. >> Hello, and I'm John Furrier with The Cube. We're back here on the ground for coverage of Consensus 2018, part of Blockchain Week New York, and we've got some amazing action going on here. We got Omar Bham, who's with Crypt0, C-R-Y-P-zero. Also got a great podcast. Great to see you. Crypt0 News, you're doing a lot of great social. Love the hat, love the swag. >> Thank you so much. >> Lookin' good. >> Thank you so much. Yeah, this is a swag actually, a follower of mine actually sent me, so I get these random boxes of just shirts, but I love 'em because my entire closet is crypto shirts, and now Goodwill, because I donate all these crypto shirts. (laughs) >> That's awesome. >> Yeah, thanks. >> Well, great to have you on. >> A pleasure. >> You're a celebrity, media celebrity, but you're really an example of a rising new kind of stakeholder in the ecosystem and the community. You're producing content. You're producing with the community. It's a co-development model. You're building a network. >> Yeah, it's... >> Not audience, they're already there, but you've got a network. >> Yeah, it's that thing where you want to find that niche. >> You know? >> John: Yeah. >> And it's just we've been blessed, some of us, to find this space pretty early on and develop that presence before others perhaps could. It's just a blessing. >> So what's your take on all this place? I got to ask you, what's your thoughts? Massive crowd. What's the analysis? >> You know, I was here last year, and we were expecting, I think it was 2750 last year, this year 4000. Turns out to be 8000 people, and a big trending Twitter post today was do you think that you're getting work done? This is my Amin Gunsir. He's one of the big blockchain, he looks at the code very deeply in different blockchains. And so he said, do you feel like you're getting work done with that many people, or do you feel like you're not? And more people were actually getting work done. I think it was, like, 62% to 38%, the vote. (John chuckles) So even with the amount of people here, people are close, tight, and still getting work, you know, (mumbles). >> Well, one other thing, and this brings up a good point. I mean, when you're face to face at a physical event, you have engagement on a whole nother level. It's not digital. Not digital face to face. >> Yeah. >> And I was down in the cafeteria for the little cafe. It's supposed to be public, open, for when you buy your lunch. >> Yeah. >> It was like a conference room. I couldn't sit down. People having meetings. There is so much business being done, relationships being built. So this community really is kind of getting work done. >> Yeah. >> And a lot of it's relationship-based. >> Sure. Yes, absolutely. And, you know, it's a lot of it to do with old relationships blossoming into new relationships. It's that I trust somebody who I already trust. So a lot of these guys have been coming to conferences together for years. >> John: Right. >> And you get introduced to somebody, and then it just works that way. And that kind of a beautiful... >> John: Yeah. >> It's like a mesh network. It's not just coming here and trying to, you know, like, necessarily shill. It's like, oh, here's my friend who I trust. >> John: Yeah. >> We went to school together. And naturally automatically, maybe it's a human thing, we just connect to that person a little bit easier. >> Talk about the work you do. And you got a YouTube channel, you got a podcast, you do some Facebook. >> Yeah. >> What's the format of the show? What's your style? What are you looking for? What kind of content are you producing? Obviously it's very engaging, it's very popular. >> Yeah. >> What's your style? >> Well, originally my style was a belief that the economy was going to collapse, so I was a big investor in stocks, I was trading, and I was trying to save my 401(k). Believe it or not, this was a while back. And I was thinking, how do I grow my capital and preserve it? I was worried that we were going to have another collapse, like 2008 was the beginning of it. So I thought about the future, the singularity, and this one point where we look at Moore's law where computing prices get cut in half for chips every year and a half, was the original road map. Prices cut in half. And basically how do we connect that old world collapsing, perhaps, (John chuckles) into this new infrastructure? And cryptocurrency came at that point, where I had already had some bitcoin, and then Ethereum was coming out, and I realized Ethereum could very well provide that base protocol for the next internet of things, so... >> And the developer community uptake has been phenomenal for Ethereum. >> Yeah, it's incredible, yeah. >> So let's do a little show right now. Omar, what's going on? How's it going? (Omar laughs) What's the content like? What's the coolest thing you're seeing here? Share some stories from the show. What have you seen? >> Let me see. I did interviews with some huge people. So it's so cool just to run into, like, the creator of Lightcoin's right there giving out stickers for his cryptomagical friends. Creator of Monero talking about how he lost all his crypto in a boating accident to me yesterday. (John laughs) Talking to some big trader dudes. Hearing about some stuff I can't even talk about, like, because I promised, and we did a verbal NDA, and I honor those. But, I don't know, it's, everywhere you look, there's something to learn, and you'll be amazed. >> It's got everything into it. I mean, I love this wave, right, because one, technically it's some magical shit happening. >> Sure. >> And it's happening big time. Starting out is growing fast. Business side, radical disruption to business models. Community has been open source, kind of an extension to open source communities. So, and then you've got a glam factor, money. >> Um-hum. >> (laughs) Right, so, I mean, money, I mean... Well, what is it missing? >> You know, I had a friend actually tell me that he got kidnapped, he got kidnapped, tied up, and held at gunpoint for three hours for all his crypto, so he lost all his crypto. So mostly the people who are, like, way up there don't do all that flaunting and showy stuff. You look at the big developers aren't rolling up in the Lambos and Ferraris. Generally you want to be pretty humble and modest about what your earnings are. And so I think it's, maybe it's a sign of, like, that Floyd Mayweather phenomenon, let me show it off. >> John: Yeah. >> Yeah, let's flaunt it. But mostly, like, I think it's that, you know, when you work for somebody, you wear a suit. When you work for yourself, no offense. (laughs) >> Yeah. >> I think you look great. You go the jeans on. >> I'm not wearing a tie, so... >> Exactly. And then when you work for yourself, you can show up in pajamas. >> Yeah. >> So... >> Well, I got to agree with you that I love the mojo, and I think one of the things that's notable in this industry is the pioneers, the guys who are making the money on the front end, they're developers, too. >> Um-hum. >> They're not just, you know, guys rolling the financial Wall Street kind of thing. They're making money and they're paying it forward, right? There's a huge pay it forward culture here. >> Yes, absolutely. >> And I think that is, I think, the differentiator that no one sees, is that that ethos is self-governing. >> Um-hum. >> Yeah, I think there'll be a mainstream adoption pretty quickly. >> Um-hum. >> But still right now it's tight-knit. >> Um-hum. >> It's very cool, and it's a pay it forward culture. >> This is mainstream to me, man. Two years, seeing this space just blossom. But we're getting there. I think it's the early adopter phase. >> John: Yeah. >> Maybe a little bit of early adopter, early majority in the United States. It depends where you are in the world. In LA, everyone has at least heard of bitcoin... >> John: Yeah. >> ...or has some bitcoin where I live. It wasn't the case before when I was living in Miami and (mumbles). >> Well, Omar, I'm a big fan of your work. We showed you the clip or two. >> Oh, I'm a fan of yours. >> We're going to get that to you. >> I love what you're doing. Thank you so much for sharing it to me. >> Yeah. >> I have to have you on my own show, for sure. >> Yeah, what's the URLs? Give a plug, what's the URLs, YouTube channel, coordinates, how do people get in touch with you? >> You can go to youtube.com slash C-R-Y-P-T-zero, so it's basically crypto, but without a zero. You can go to Twitter, so you can follow me on... >> Without an O. >> Yeah? >> It's crypto without an O, or with an O? >> Not the letter O, just the letter, the number zero. >> The number zero, okay. >> So C-R-Y-P-T-zero. Then you go to Crypt0's News. Same way, I'm always Crypt0 with a zero at the end instead of a letter. So Crypt0's News, Instagram, Twitter. We're on SteamIt, Crypt0 everywhere. >> Well, let's do some code development together. You're now a Cube alumni. >> Yeah. >> Welcome to The Cube. >> Thank you so much for having me. We just met... >> Yeah, yeah. >> ...but I'm really excited to have met you. Super personality, man. >> Love the new producers. We love co-developing. We do it out in the open. We're in the open right now. We're on the floor here at Consensus 2018 bringing you all the coverage. Going to do 10 more interviews tomorrow. I did eight interviews last night. We interview anything that moves that's high-quality. Omar, thanks for coming on. It's The Cube. I'm John Furrier. Thanks for watching. >> Thanks, John. >> Announcer: Live from the campus of MIT in Cambridge, Massachusetts, it's The Cube! Covering the MIT Chief Data Officer and the Information Quality Symposium. Now here's your host Stu Miniman.

Published Date : May 18 2018

SUMMARY :

Announcer: From New York, it's The Cube! We're back here on the ground Thank you so much. and the community. but you've got a network. and develop that presence before others perhaps could. I got to ask you, what's your thoughts? and still getting work, you know, (mumbles). you have engagement on a whole nother level. for when you buy your lunch. So this community really is kind of getting work done. And, you know, it's a lot of it to do with old relationships And you get introduced to somebody, and trying to, you know, like, And naturally automatically, Talk about the work you do. What kind of content are you producing? that the economy was going to collapse, And the developer community uptake What's the coolest thing you're seeing here? So it's so cool just to run into, like, I mean, I love this wave, right, kind of an extension to open source communities. Well, what is it missing? So mostly the people who are, like, I think it's that, you know, I think you look great. And then when you work for yourself, Well, I got to agree with you that I love the mojo, They're not just, you know, And I think that is, I think, Yeah, I think there'll be and it's a pay it forward culture. I think it's the early adopter phase. It depends where you are in the world. ...or has some bitcoin where I live. We showed you the clip or two. Thank you so much for sharing it to me. You can go to Twitter, so you can follow me on... Then you go to Crypt0's News. Well, let's do some code development together. Thank you so much for having me. ...but I'm really excited to have met you. We do it out in the open. and the Information Quality Symposium.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JohnPERSON

0.99+

OmarPERSON

0.99+

MiamiLOCATION

0.99+

Omar BhamPERSON

0.99+

LALOCATION

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

62%QUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

38%QUANTITY

0.99+

three hoursQUANTITY

0.99+

2008DATE

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

United StatesLOCATION

0.99+

eight interviewsQUANTITY

0.99+

Cambridge, MassachusettsLOCATION

0.99+

GoodwillORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

8000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

this yearDATE

0.99+

MITORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

10 more interviewsQUANTITY

0.99+

LambosORGANIZATION

0.99+

Two yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.98+

last nightDATE

0.98+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.98+

one pointQUANTITY

0.98+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.97+

Amin GunsirPERSON

0.96+

oneQUANTITY

0.96+

Blockchain WeekEVENT

0.96+

FerrarisORGANIZATION

0.95+

2750QUANTITY

0.94+

TwitterORGANIZATION

0.93+

halfQUANTITY

0.93+

every year and a halfQUANTITY

0.93+

Crypt0ORGANIZATION

0.92+

4000QUANTITY

0.92+

The CubeORGANIZATION

0.91+

NYCLOCATION

0.9+

Wall StreetLOCATION

0.9+

InstagramORGANIZATION

0.87+

MoorePERSON

0.84+

Consensus 2018TITLE

0.83+

Crypt0 NewsORGANIZATION

0.83+

bitcoinOTHER

0.82+

401(k)OTHER

0.81+

Floyd MayweatherORGANIZATION

0.76+

EthereumOTHER

0.76+

MoneroORGANIZATION

0.75+

SteamItTITLE

0.75+

SymposiumORGANIZATION

0.71+

Consensus 2018EVENT

0.71+

EthereumTITLE

0.7+

LightcoinTITLE

0.69+

youtube.comORGANIZATION

0.66+

2018EVENT

0.61+

ChiefPERSON

0.54+

yearsQUANTITY

0.49+

zeroQUANTITY

0.49+

-P-zeroOTHER

0.48+

Andrew Prell, Convergence | Blockchain Week NYC 2018


 

>> Announcer: From New York, it's The Cube, covering Blockchain Week. Now, here's John Furrier. >> Hello everyone and welcome back, I'm John Furrier, co-host of The Cube. We're here on the ground, in the middle of all the action. Consensus 2018, I'm here with Andrew Prell, with Convergence. Cube alumni, we met in Puerto Rico, industry legend, veteran, been around, welcome back. >> Thank you, like to be here. >> So Convergence, you guys got a unique opportunity, we did a deep dive on YouTube, check Andrew Prell, Convergence, youtube.com/siliconangle, great video to watch from Puerto Rico. Quickly, one minute, explain what you guys do, and then we'll get into the new hot news. >> All right, so we're reimagining the whole video game space. We marry the consumer game industry to the out of home entertainment industry, into one operating layer, where all devices get to play against each other, in the same game space. Then we put our virtual currency on the Blockchain, to eliminate all the fraud and theft that happens when people try to convert their digital assets to actual cash. >> Okay, so what's the news real quick? Give us the update, what's going on, what's the update? >> Well see the update, we had initially named our token, back in September of 2014, while we're building everything out. We had named it Nano. Raiblocks, put it out on the Blockchain, just what a month ago, month and a half ago, as Nano, so we had to rename the token. So we announced, and we've already burnt them, put them on the Blockchain, they're in our wallets right now, on May the fourth, we announced our new token, as the Droid coin. So May the fourth be with you. (laughter) These are the Droids your looking for. So we have the Droid coin now in twenty different wallets ready to start deploying them as our white paper states. >> And you get the big momentum going on. Team updates, any new personnel, what's going on, what's the progress? >> Well the personnel actually, we just had a major event, called run for the unicorns, we had it in Louisville, Kentucky, derby week. And we took all the VIP's and press and that to the derby at the end of the week. It was a really great event. There's when we rolled out the coin, we had the team up on day two talking through all of it. It was really an awesome event then, we're now here at Consensus talking with Ledger. What they're doing right now really works well with our investment funds. 'Cause we did the, we talked last about the virtuous circle of a token based investment fund, and where we're breaking up ten funds allowing the VC's to have nine of them, and go up against the DOW on the Blockchain. Well the vault that the Ledger has, we're starting to walk through with them because we'll bring it to it's limits and it really seems like something awesome for, you know, just the whole Blockchain industry in general, in having that security at a industrial level or a institutional investor level. >> Andrew I would literally appreciate you coming back on. Real quick, what are you learning here at the show? What are doing, any business deals? Let's get the update on the ground here for you. >> On the ground here for me, we're actually have several major deals in the works that we're trying to close right now. If all goes well, by the end of this week, if not next, we will be done closing our funding rounds, period. And then from that point on, the only way you'll be able to get our tokens is to buy them from some of the startups that we're investing in, so. >> Great model. Check out our YouTube video with Andrew, deep dive, changing the gaming industry a whole nother level, really innovative solution and business model. And the tech underneath is all cutting edge. Andrew thanks for coming on The Cube again, giving us a quick update, I'm John Furrier here on the ground at Consensus 2018, in Manhattan at the Hilton Midtown for Blockchain week, New York City. >> But did we tell them where they can find our stuff? >> Go get, give the URL plug. >> Yeah, ico.silicanexus.com and fund.silicanexus.com that's where you can find all of our information on everything we're doing. >> All right, good luck with the progress, we'll be right back with more coverage after this break. >> Thank you.

Published Date : May 17 2018

SUMMARY :

Announcer: From New York, We're here on the ground, in the middle of all the action. we did a deep dive on YouTube, We marry the consumer game industry to the out of home Well see the update, we had initially named our token, And you get the big momentum going on. Well the personnel actually, we just had a major event, Let's get the update on the ground here for you. On the ground here for me, we're actually have several I'm John Furrier here on the ground at Consensus 2018, fund.silicanexus.com that's where you can find All right, good luck with the progress,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AndrewPERSON

0.99+

September of 2014DATE

0.99+

Andrew PrellPERSON

0.99+

Puerto RicoLOCATION

0.99+

ManhattanLOCATION

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

ico.silicanexus.comOTHER

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

ConvergenceORGANIZATION

0.99+

fund.silicanexus.comOTHER

0.99+

LedgerORGANIZATION

0.99+

New York CityLOCATION

0.99+

a month agoDATE

0.99+

twenty different walletsQUANTITY

0.99+

ConsensusORGANIZATION

0.98+

one minuteQUANTITY

0.98+

month and a half agoDATE

0.98+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.98+

Hilton MidtownLOCATION

0.98+

2018DATE

0.97+

day twoQUANTITY

0.96+

The CubeORGANIZATION

0.96+

end of this weekDATE

0.96+

NYCLOCATION

0.95+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.94+

Blockchain WeekEVENT

0.94+

May the fourthDATE

0.91+

Blockchain weekEVENT

0.91+

Droid coinOTHER

0.91+

one operating layerQUANTITY

0.84+

Consensus 2018EVENT

0.79+

Louisville, KentuckyLOCATION

0.77+

end of the weekDATE

0.77+

nineQUANTITY

0.73+

ten fundsQUANTITY

0.7+

2018EVENT

0.7+

run for theEVENT

0.63+

BlockchainOTHER

0.54+

weekEVENT

0.53+

youtube.com/siliconangleORGANIZATION

0.5+

RaiblocksORGANIZATION

0.37+

Chris Anderson, Deloitte | ServiceNow Knowledge18


 

>> (announcer) Live from Las Vegas: It's the Cube covering service now knowledge 2018 brought to you by Service Now. >> Welcome back to Las Vegas, everybody. This is the Cube: the leader in live tech coverage. We go out to the events, and, we extract the signal from the noise. This is day 3 of Service Now Knowledge, k18. The hashtag is #Know18. I'm Dave Vellante with my co-host Jeff Frick. Chris Anderson is here she's the managing director of Delloit, running the telecommunications, media, and technology practice. Welcome to the cube, thanks for coming on. >> Thank you so much, glad to be here. >> So, Delloit, awesome company, we had some of your colleagues on earlier. You guys have deep industry expertise. Global scale, leading digital transformations. First of all, what's your role, and let's get into it. >> Sure, so, I work in, as you mentioned, RTMC practice, full of acronyms, right? Mostly focused in the telecom space, and I've been in the telecom space for about 20 years. I'm really driving large scale transformation of the operations: how do we make the business more effective, how do we improve the overall customer experience, right, and how do we make sure that as new technology comes online in tel-cos, that that's seamless to customers, and that they don't fell the disruption, if you will, right, of the large leaps that tel-cos are making. >> Well, so, help us understand the basics of tel-co, um, you've got cost per bit coming down, you got data growing like crazy, you have over the top providers just bogarding the network, tel-co infrastructure is fossilized, um, wow, You must have a lot to do. >> Well we all want to watch the basketball game as we walk from the floor, to our car, into the house right >> 24/7, right, so, major, major challenges, which is great opportunity for you and Delloit. >> Absolutely. >> But give us your perspective on the state of the state in the industry. >> Sure, so I think it's funny you say the basics of tel-co, 'cause I think that's the hard part about tel-co, is it's not really basic, like, everyone expects that communications are there real time, right, and there's always going to be, we'll call it tone, right, but I think now it's at a whole new level, right, I think the challenge now for tel-co is mobility, right, I mean the pace of mobility, right, the massive proliferation of devices right, and sensors that are all connected. And so I think that now, I think the basics of tel-co. the game has changed, right, tel-co used to be it's own vertical, right, and now. it's really its own horizontal, right, enabling smart health, smart cities, right, many other industries, and I think that's the challenge for tel-co, and, it's become the new basic, if you will, it's not just the network for dial tone, right, it's about a true enabler for industry, right, and communications in real time right across the board. >> So, tel-co, that's really interesting, how you positioned that, so, tel-co has a dual agenda. >> Yes. >> The horizontal technology platform, and maintaining the verticle, not getting disrupted, so can it, can tel-co pull off that dual agenda? >> I think it has to, right, because to the point verticle, it used to be that they were the straight line,right, they provided the service and they were directly linked to the end customer, right, and, now, there are lots of other content aggregators and providers in that space, and so it's getting harder and harder for tel-cos to really maintain connectivity to their end customer, right, so they've also got to be an important part of the value chain, right, and other businesses, so I think they have to do both in parallel to stay relevant, but I think that's what makes kind of an, part of our work with servicenow, and how it comes in is the focus on customer service management, right, and really the part about the network, right, is the critical underpinning for tel-co, but if you ask tel-co network people, they say that is the experience, right. That's how I get the experience, right, is the speed of the network, right. I can't have any latency, it's always available, right, for it to enable these mission critical, mission critical things. >> Amazing, and you have these things coming up like, 5G, and industrial internet of things, you know, and we, we did a nice piece with a company that had a remote operation of autonomous vehicle. So, you know, they're driving the car from the office while we're in the car. Business case being take care of the edge cases on autonomous vehicles, so, latency becomes a really important thing with car brakes, and these things, so the opportunity and the challenges are only going to grow with this kind of next big leap that we're going to see built up around the 5G capability. >> Yeah, I think the move to 5G will be transformational, for the industry, right? And, really, 'cause now, you know, you expect your communications to work but you get frustrated, like, if your phone doesn't work, or your internet's not working, you just get frustrated, right, if your autonomous, you know, self driving vehicle is not working, right, or you've got a mission critical device, right, helping your heart beat, right, those are, those are different things, right, in a kind mission criticality that I think 5G introduces the potential for, right, will really change the game, right, but also makes it critical that you understand that full path of the network connectivity, and the services to the customer, right, 'cause if you're not in control of that full path to delivery there's no way to guarantee, right, the mission criticality that 5G` can deliver on. >> Right, so Chris, how does your work, um, what's your focus with the tel-cos? How does it intersect with what you're doing with service now, and how does it ultimately benefit consumers? >> Sure, so my focus, really, in the tel-co space has been in, in what tel-cos call "BSS",right, which are business support systems, or really, the front office. So, from, you know, helping customers from, the time of quoting, right, or ordering services, all the way through to fulfillment and delivery of them, right, I think that's the intersection, really, that is important to us with servicenow, right, our work with servicenow, to date, like many organizations, has been kind of in the IT service management space, HR, more on the enterprise, right, but not truly the heart of the business, right, and where we're really focused is, you know, working with servicenow to bring them into the heart of the business of tel-cos, right, and really change the game, right, I think one of the hot, one of the benefits in what I do, which is large scale transformation, most of these take years, right, two to three years before customers see any benefit of transition from one platform to another, right, and we've already been able to do some work with servicenow right, and our partnership, that you can see the benefit in months, right with a lot less risk, so it's really kind of taking the long term experience that I've had with the traditional industry players, right, and creating agility, right, and transformation from taking that from years to months, right, reducing the risk profile, right, and really creating an amazing experience across the value chain. >> Great benefits Dave: less risk and faster. >> Well, well, so I want to bring that back to sort of what we were talking about earlier: I mentioned the over top, top providers, when I think about my experience with interacting with, Netflix for example, I don't talk to their sales department, or their customer service department or their maintenance. I just interact with Netflix. Is that the vision for where you're trying to take tel-cos? >> I think it's part of it, right? 'Cause to your point, if the service I'm getting, works like it should, I don't want to talk to anybody. Right, like, I think that historically, we think of customer service and customer service management as I call somebody and how do they help me. Right, and I think the next generation of good service is how do I make sure they don't need to call me. >> No calls. >> Right, no calls, right, how does this work, and how do I stay on top of it, and I understand anything that might be degrading the experience and I get my arms around that, and so I think the new generation of customer service management is understanding, right, those things and kind of having a full and immediate view, and being able to take action quickly, and I think the kind of customer service management solution is important. We've been building out what we're calling an end to end service assurance solution ,right, with the servicenow team, and that really lets us look at from the time that an issue is detected, which could be customer degrading, all the way through to resolution. Right, to be able to own that path right to closure right, and really have real time visibility, and the ability to act and the ability to see those metrics and really manage your business real time. >> Well we hear that all the time: going from kind of a historical look at data, and reacting to being a little bit more, um, predictive, but then ultimately being more prescriptive, so you're, you see, you see, the development of the problem before the problem becomes a big problem. >> And I think that that is the future of customer service, and its going to be critical, right, as we pivot to 5G and we've got mission critical services running on that network that we really get this right, so. >> How about the event here, um, what are your takeaways? You're hearing a lot about what I call machine intelligence, AI, um Dev Ops, I mean all kinds of cool tech going around, but what's resonating with you Chris? >> So, probably say the opposite of what everyone's saying so I hear that but like we spent a little bit of time with a client yesterday right and we were talking about machine learning and artificial intelligence, and they say okay that's great so I can, you know, how do I take the emails that come from somebody written in a third language trying to write them in english, and what's the challenge of how do I get artificial intelligence to figure out what that issue is, and go act on it right, and so I think, I think these technologies are exciting, but I think we also have to pay a lot of attention to the basics right and not think that there is a shortcut right to providing the service and the mission criticality so to me I still think in terms of really enabling the front office that they're early days I think its certainly worth the investment but I think part of it is just looking critically at the business remember that the service and the service levels right are really driving right and we keep pushing the technology to catch up but I'm I would not I haven't seen a lot of tel-cos in the front office where experience is concerned be early adopters because that's the least the last risk that you want to take. >> But that's a great example, though, because that's a very specific use case where you would like to see more intelligence applied, and I think that's really the key as well where can we get the value as opposed to a generic dead smart person named thing that kind of exists, right, here is a specific problem, can we use AI and machine learning to help us solve that specific problem. >> Because what we, I think what we know is that if I have a sensor on a device and it picks up an issue I can start acting on that immediately, right, the ones that are much harder to act on are the ones that people report and then have to be translated right to figure out the action that needs to be taken but guess what there's still the same SOA attached to it right so how do I really advance you know artificial intelligence to really be able to move that forward in a much faster and reliable way right to the point where businesses will take a bet on it, so >> Alright we'll give you the last word Chris what should we know about, you know Delloit, kind of a bumper sticker, um, you know, your servicenow practice and tel-co what's your take-aways? >> So, um, I think, I think the magic, right, of the partnership and where we're really trying to take it is the fusion of our truly deep industry experience right and folks that have been in and around for 20 years, and using the servicenow solution in new ways right, and really again bringing it to the core of the value chain right, and, and frankly disrupting a lot of the industry solutions that have been out there that have gotten quite set in their ways like we see so many of our clients that don't have good answers right then they're paralyzed right trying to look at all the solutions that are there, and not finding anything that they like, and I think that's the magic that we're trying to bring to the partnership and really disrupt the game. >> Awesome. Well thanks for coming. Thank you I appreciate it guys. >> Alright keep it right there everybody listen you want to go to a couple of resources I want to give you for some great free content go to theCube.net, you'll see all the videos here, go to youtube.com/siliconangle subscribe to that channel, get notified of all the action we're at all the shows um siliconeangle.com for all the news wikibomb.com is a research site so check those out keep it right there everybody well be back with our next guest right after this short break.

Published Date : May 10 2018

SUMMARY :

brought to you by Service Now. This is the Cube: the leader in live tech coverage. we had some of your colleagues on earlier. and I've been in the telecom space for about 20 years. you have over the top providers just bogarding the network, which is great opportunity for you and Delloit. the state of the state in the industry. it's become the new basic, if you will, how you positioned that, so, and really the part about the network, right, 5G, and industrial internet of things, you know, and the services to the customer, right, and where we're really focused is, you know, Is that the vision for where you're trying to take tel-cos? Right, and I think the next generation of good service is and the ability to act and the ability to see those metrics and reacting to being a little bit more, um, and its going to be critical, right, providing the service and the mission criticality so to me I intelligence applied, and I think that's really the key as and really again bringing it to the core of the value chain Thank you I appreciate it guys. to a couple of resources I want to give you for some great

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

ChrisPERSON

0.99+

Chris AndersonPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

DelloitORGANIZATION

0.99+

5G`ORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

theCube.netOTHER

0.98+

2018DATE

0.98+

yesterdayDATE

0.98+

about 20 yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

DeloitteORGANIZATION

0.98+

youtube.com/siliconangleOTHER

0.98+

three yearsQUANTITY

0.98+

one platformQUANTITY

0.96+

5GORGANIZATION

0.96+

siliconeangle.comOTHER

0.96+

englishOTHER

0.95+

bothQUANTITY

0.93+

oneQUANTITY

0.93+

servicenowORGANIZATION

0.93+

20 yearsQUANTITY

0.91+

tel-coORGANIZATION

0.89+

third languageQUANTITY

0.88+

RTMCORGANIZATION

0.85+

wikibomb.comOTHER

0.84+

Service Now KnowledgeORGANIZATION

0.82+

Service NowORGANIZATION

0.82+

coORGANIZATION

0.78+

day 3QUANTITY

0.72+

telORGANIZATION

0.72+

DelloitPERSON

0.58+

ceNowTITLE

0.57+

k18EVENT

0.48+

Joel Horwitz, IBM | IBM Think 2018


 

>> Narrator: Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE! Covering IBM Think 2018. Brought to you by IBM. >> Hello everyone and welcome back to theCUBE's exclusive, three days of coverage here at IBM Think 2018. I'm John Furrier co-host with Dave Vellante, hosting three days and next is Joel Horowitz, Vice President Strategic Partnerships and Offering, of The Digital Business Group. >> Thanks. >> Welcome back to theCUBE. Good to see you. >> Good to see you guys. Thanks for having me here. >> Thanks for coming on. >> You've been on theCUBE, probably so many times, talking big data, talking analytics, now, in your new role in The Digital Group, the digital transformation. I really want to just ask you right off the bat about your new role, and how it relates to the changing ecosystem. >> Joel: Yeah. >> All of these markets are changing big time, the role of the ecosystem, the leverage that they have with technology and the value propositions, whether it's decentralized applications in Blockchain to storage and infrastructure, and big data. What is your role, take a minute to explain what you're doing, because you have a unique position, because this demand for partnerships, this demand for collaboration at many levels. What's the latest? >> So I would describe my role as being a champion of our partners, for sure. I look at, you know, I take, a very outside in perspective on IBM. Joining just over three years ago now, I came in, really through analytics, as you know, focused on machine learning, data science, and the growth of A.I. at that time. Last year I was part of the corporate development team over there. So looking, really, at a lot of the industry trends and what's going on, as well, in analytics, data, and A.I. This year, you know, we recognize that we're only going to do so many strategic partnerships a year, right, where there's probably a handful that we're going to work with. For example, last year we did a great partnership with Lightbend to bring their reactive platform to IBM, and we launched the iPhone 10, with Verizon on Lightbend's platform. But, these days, my team, can't be everywhere, obviously, and part of the value of digital, and that route to market is really the idea that partner should be able to self service. So, you know, my job this year, is frankly to put myself out of a job, right. Meaning, if I can get, you know, 70% of the work my team does, right, contracting, legal, setting up, provisioning, all of that on our cloud, and partners can just do that themselves. Then we'll capture a much larger swath of the emerging A.I., data, and cloud market. >> I want to talk about the killer app creating value and then the role the market place is playing. You mentioned self service. I want to kind of go down that. Before we get there, I want to get your thoughts on this because I noticed, in your role you're covering, it's cutting across a lot of different things, and you know we've been talking about cloud, as a horizontally disrupting technology, >> Joel: Yeah. >> Certainly in the data space you saw that. And stacks will be horizontally scalable with the cloud. >> Yeah. >> But you could be vertical specialization in the applications. So I noticed you're covering analytics, Watson, Cloud, hybrid cloud, emerging technologies. >> Yeah. >> Blockchain, and many others. >> Yeah. >> So talk about, it's obvious you guys are now cutting across, horizontally, across the different IBM divisions. Is that by design? >> Yeah. >> What's the impact of the ecosystem and partners for that horizontally cut over? >> Yeah, I know, I mean it's a great question, I think. Look, there are some specific design patterns that we see across every technology, across every, you know, business at IBM. One design pattern is pretty obvious, you saw it with the launch of the IBM cloud private data. Following up on last years IBM Cloud Private. And that design pattern is really about people containerizing applications. And so, at the end of the week, we have the business partner, or PartnerWorld Leadership conference. Excuse me. Where a number of our partners really are looking at how do I bring that work load to the cloud. And it's not so much the cloud is the end point. That's really the starting off point to A; Get much wider distribution and B; Be able to take advantage of a lot of these emerging technologies, like Blockchain, like A.I. Like IOT, and numerous others, Quantum, et cetera, they'll just keep coming. So really cloud to me is just a way for us to open the door to a lot of the technology that's flooding the market. >> Dave: Joel, can you talk about partnership, you mentioned before that you guys are kind of selective, John calls them Barney deals, ya know. I love you, you love me. You guys sound like you don't look for those, not volume, it's quality. >> Yeah. >> What are the criteria that you're looking for? How do you get value out of those? How do you measure that value out of the partnerships? If someone is a prospective partner out there, how should I be interacting with you? >> Yeah, I think, there's probably two steps. I think one is really recognizing that, in my own personal view, is that we really want to partner with folks who embrace open standards. Now I'm not going to like go as far to say open source, 'cause I think there is a lot that goes into that. But I will say open standards, meaning, not these like large monolithic applications, but can you actually integrate with us in some meaningful way? And to do that, that's why we actually started on this new platform that we are launching today. Called IBM Partner Self-service. Is the ability to first integrate with IBM. So, if you can demonstrate that you can build with IBM first, whether that's a startup, an ISV, a business partner. Like that's criteria number one. Criteria number two is are you a trusted partner? So, do you actually have the same level of competency that we would expect from, frankly, our own sellers, and our own people. And so, to do that, we've also launched new competency paths for business partners and partners as well. So, those are the two major criterias. And then the third one, which I think is kind of the holy grail, is selling with IBM. So we also launched a sell with path today where you can actually list in our marketplace. And then we will actually help you reach new markets. And then demonstrate there's clients, there's a client need that really wants our joint solution, right? And so, to me, those are the three things, to re-state. Like, you know, building with us, having a level of competency with us, and then demonstrating client success with us. >> Okay, so, integrate, you really don't need you guys to do that. I can just dive in and do that. Bake it out a little bit, and then approach you. What kind of help do you give? Do you have programs once you get by those gates? >> So, you know, I would categorize into two groups, I think we have a ton of online support. So, you know, we even embrace Slack at IBM. If you're not aware of that, we have Slack everywhere. And, so, for a self service, I want to say, look, what does zero touch mean, right, in this day and age, for a partner. And so, they can go to our site today, and actually get, you know, sign up for Slack, and talk directly to our technical specialist as well as to our developer advocates. And so, on the enablement and integration side, my colleague, Angel Diaz and team, have done a great job of launching hundreds of IBM code patterns. So that you can just pick these artifacts up, these assets up, and leverage them to integrate all sorts of capabilities into your product. >> You know, Dave, I want to get your thoughts on this, because you and I have been talking about the API integration, and I want to get back to Joel's point in a second because I think this is critical for startups and ecosystem partners. API's are the (speaking quickly) for developers right now, so if I don't want to take a big chance on being all in on IBM, say I want to kick the tires, API's are critical. So the question is, are you seeing that traction on your side of the house, in terms of the end now, since the level of API integration, is that the touchpoint? Is it like the beginning phases? And what level of commitment that you're seeing with people. >> Well, John, to me it comes down to innovation, and it's interesting because Joel came out of the data world. To me, the innovation in the next 10 years starts with data. The second component of that innovation, I think, over the next decade or so is going to be, really, A.I., whether you call it cognitive or machine intelligence or artificial intelligence. And then third, I think is cloud economics and that's really where the API economy fits in. You got to have API'S to integrate, as Joel was saying. You've got to have marginal... You've got to have scale, marginal costs go to zero eventually. You've got to have network effects and you've got to be able to track startups, which is another question I have. >> Now Joel, back to you, on the start on the integration, whether it's a startup or a big company. It used to be, the old days, you got to go all in. You've got to get the developer kit, >> Joel: Yeah. >> Download it, line it to a swim lane, get deeper, prove your value. >> Yeah. >> Find the value's faster; what's the first hurdle if someone wants, hey I want to give IBM a shot here? Love the sell, holy grail option, is it API'S, can people integration on their own? Talk about that specific first step because some people might open up the door and go whoa! There's more here than I thought. Or, wow, there's some real tech. Or, I don't want to use IBM tech, I want to use some of mine. There's that first indifference point. >> Yeah, I think there are areas where we've seen dramatic customer experience improvements. So to give one example, as we've partnered with Ubisoft, Redstorm last year around a new title game that they released called Star Trek Bridge Crew, and so, you know, to me, we went on our own merit, and I think that publisher chose IBM because Watson Conversation is absolutely the best on the market. And so what that did is it enabled game players, their end customer, their end user, to speak into a VR headset and just give commands, as you would naturally. And so, I think a lot of, as you think about IBM, it's, yeah, we've made it completely easy to access our API'S. I think, there's a great quote from the founder of Flickr that I read years ago, I'll go dig it up for you guys later, but it was along the lines of business development means, today is exposing your API'S, like, that's it! And, on the other side of it, we give a lot away in terms of cloud credits, right, and so, today, if you go and sign up on our self service platform, we'll give you $10,000 a month in free cloud credits to build and build quickly. Because, at the end of the day, if it's not self service, if it requires more heavy lifting, then, frankly, we're not doing our jobs. And so that's my commitment, is to make sure that is available, is accessible, and there's experts there that can help you on your journey. >> So that attracts startups, obviously, 10K a month is a honey pot for those guys. What about existing IBM clients that want to get to the cloud. Migrate to the cloud. How do you help those guys? >> Yeah, so, in the migration front, we have a great team in place with IBM services, who basically have set up a migration factor, if you will, and there are numerous ways to chart your course to the cloud. Whether it's, you know, full cloud or hybrid cloud, or some offloading, some aspects to the cloud. There's a lot of different paths you can take and so to do that, we're offering $50,000 in migration credits for the first couple months. We're also offering 35% off for professional services. So, we have a great offer going on over the next few months to help people make that first step. >> Incentives are key. >> And, look, we're here with you so it's not like, here, throwing it over the fence, and good luck! You know, tweet at me, instant message me, I'm around. And I will be absolutely committed to partner success. >> Yeah, you know, incentives are critical, that's going to get the market going. But, the end of the day, it's the type of value, and I want to get your thoughts, it's something that's come up that I've heard people talk about in the hallways and other conferences. They kind of chirp about "Hey, you know, "I'd like to get this, from suppliers. "I want to see more tools, more programs "to help me get more customers, to get more value. "I'm building apps, but also got a business to run." What are some of the conversations you've had over the past year with customers and partners? Stack rank the top three or four things that they talk about, either their pain points or things that are on their mind, that's worth noting? >> I mean, I would say first and foremost, I mean, me, myself, being in a startup at H2O. Three, four years ago. We used to walk in there and sell into the data scientists, right, so if you don't know H2O, they're a great company, a machine learning company, but we would get the data scientists really excited about working with our product, and then lo and behold, we'd get to the CIO office saying, "Hey, what is this stuff? "Get it out of here." You know, Hadoop was the same way, by the way, 2010 working at AVG, like, we'd bring in Hadoop. Like what is this data like thing? There's no governance, it's a mess. Where they could really, you know, work with IBM, where they see value from IBM is when we go into the CIO office together and say, look, we've demonstrated that there's value here. We've demonstrated that there's actual customer need. We can create a lot of help in terms of getting the rest of the organization bought in. Put in the right governance around it. Because, look, I mean GDPR is real, it's a big deal. Like, data privacy, is huge. So, you know, Rob Thomas likes to say, "You can't have good A.I. without I.A." I think that's a great information architecture. So, I agree, and so I think that's what the number one benefit is. Really get in there, move quickly, demonstrate value, and then when you're ready to make that next step of how you roll that out to the rest of the enterprise, that's when IBM becomes a huge help. >> You know, you mentioned GDPR. With regulatory issues now are becoming criteria for a lot of application developers that are small that may not have the resources to handle the right to get your name out of a database or other tools, and other regulations, certainly. Decentralize applications with Blockchain, another regulatory challenge-- >> Yep. >> Opportunity as well. Are you guys having those kinds of conversations, like putting specific things in place beyond GDPR, and if so what regulatory and legal things do you see out there that could be blockers for customers, that you guys hope to go after? >> I mean, I don't think there's a one word answer here. I do think that you take it on a case by case basis. I think you're seeing different countries adopt GDPR differently. Germany, obviously, being a very strict kind of country in doing that. So, you know, IBM services, as well as our analytics team, are really focused on that. I think, like I said, what you saw with ICP data coming out this week, I think that's a really important way to look at it. My own personal view, I think, for sure there's a lot of compliance, They have to look at, and understand the workflow, workflows of how people are using that data, as well as application architecture is big. And those are all the considerations, I think, that you are going to see as people move. I read a statistic that 40% of all CSP'S, MSP'S, are moving, are growing, like it's 40% growth from IBC, 50% of all developers are now embedding A.I. So, this market is growing and growing fast. But, you're right. If folks out there aren't really taking GDPR seriously, you can get yourself into some hot water. >> Well, we've observed that scale matters, certainly, whether it's a partner or cloud, that gets, that helps people. >> Yeah. >> Joel, well, thanks for coming onto theCUBE, we really appreciate it. >> Yeah, my pleasure. >> Before we end, I want to get your thoughts, just share with the folks that are watching. What kind of deals do you want to do? What's on your radar? What's the priorities for you? From a strategic business development standpoint. To develop across that horizontally scalable, IBM division space, as well as technology space? >> You know, it's not what deals I want to do, it's really what deals our partners want to do. >> Come on, your in charge, come on. >> It's really what deals our partners want to do, ya know. I mean, look, I get excited about transforming industries, I really do, so I look at, not what's the transactional partnership, like go, we'll do something, and there's some revenue, or something. I look at how do we transform an industry? >> Let me rephrase the question. What's on the priority list for you guys, from a transformational area, that's important for your partners. >> Yeah, I would say for sure, obviously, A.I. is huge. Obviously data is huge, obviously cloud is huge. But, looking really specific, I think you just add tech after each industry. So Addtech, Fintech, Healthtech obviously. Game tech and, I think, probably the last one, to me personally, is the most exciting. We signed an amazing deal with Unity at the end of last year, the start of this year. In fact GDC game developer conference is going on as we speak in San Francisco. So half my team right now is over there, demonstrating Watson as like VR, AR, and it's not just for games, right. It's like with BMW and VW doing some cool stuff there as well. So, I'm really excited about the, AR, VR, industry growing, especially with our partner Unity. >> There's a new creative out there-- >> Can I jump in before you exit? I want to ask you a follow up on that, because if transformation is sort of the target for your partnerships. Healthcare is an area that should be transformed. But, needs to be transformed, but it's hard to transform healthcare. >> Joel: It is, yeah. >> Do you feel like you could start moving the needle from a partnership perspective? Or is that going to take some more time? >> You know, I think there's a lot of great work being done there. I do believe... Look, in general, I think we can move a lot faster with partners, in fact, I like to call it like the Nordstrom model. Right? Like IBM in the past has been Barney's of New York, forever, right? From a branding and from how we partner with folks, like I think we need to move more to a Nordstrom, like, yeah, we'll sell our own offerings off the rack, but then we need to help partners come in and create the right styles for the right need and the right industry. >> Yeah and then there's a Nordstrom Rack you're going to need to put that on. (laughing) Over technology goes the Nordstrom Rack. Joel Horowitz, thanks for coming out. Vice President Strategic Partnerships and Offerings, here on theCUBE. I'm John Furrier with Dave Vellante, with three days of IBM Think live streaming, all of the videos will be up on thecube.net sports live now. Youtube.com/siliconangle for all the ondemands when the show's over. We'll be right back with more after this short break. (light techno music)

Published Date : Mar 19 2018

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by IBM. back to theCUBE's exclusive, Good to see you. Good to see you guys. and how it relates to the role of the ecosystem, and that route to market and you know we've been Certainly in the in the applications. So talk about, it's obvious you guys And so, at the end of the week, You guys sound like you Is the ability to first What kind of help do you give? So that you can just is that the touchpoint? came out of the data world. the start on the integration, Download it, line it to a swim lane, Find the value's faster; and so, you know, to me, How do you help those guys? and so to do that, with you so it's not like, They kind of chirp about "Hey, you know, of how you roll that out to that may not have the resources to handle for customers, that you I do think that you take that gets, that helps people. we really appreciate it. What kind of deals do you want to do? our partners want to do. I look at how do we transform an industry? What's on the priority list for you guys, I think you just add I want to ask you a follow up on that, and create the right all of the videos will be up

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JoelPERSON

0.99+

SamsungORGANIZATION

0.99+

HuaweiORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

ZTEORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Joel HorowitzPERSON

0.99+

LightbendORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jon TroyerPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

$50,000QUANTITY

0.99+

OrangeORGANIZATION

0.99+

TelefonicaORGANIZATION

0.99+

John TroyerPERSON

0.99+

VerizonORGANIZATION

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

NordstromORGANIZATION

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

UbisoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

Star Trek Bridge CrewTITLE

0.99+

BMWORGANIZATION

0.99+

VWORGANIZATION

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Deutsche TelekomORGANIZATION

0.99+

AsiaLOCATION

0.99+

Joel HorwitzPERSON

0.99+

Darrell Jordan-SmithPERSON

0.99+

DarrellPERSON

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

GooglesORGANIZATION

0.99+

OlympicsEVENT

0.99+

50%QUANTITY

0.99+

AT&TORGANIZATION

0.99+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.99+

telcosORGANIZATION

0.99+

12QUANTITY

0.99+

MondayDATE

0.99+

Last yearDATE

0.99+

telcoORGANIZATION

0.99+

North AmericaLOCATION

0.99+

35%QUANTITY

0.99+

AVGORGANIZATION

0.99+

AddtechORGANIZATION

0.99+

Rob ThomasPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

40%QUANTITY

0.99+

H2OORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

Margaux Avedisian, Transform Group & CooLPool Fund | Polycon 2018


 

>> Announcer: Live from Nassau in the Bahamas, it's theCUBE, covering Polygon 18, brought to you by Polymax. >> Hello, welcome back to our live coverage of this exclusive Cube coverage in the Bahamas for PolyCon 18. It's cryptocurrency, it's token economics, its de-centralized world, it's all about the future of the Internet, Dave. I'm with Dave Vellante here, our next guest is Margaux Avedisian, EVP of Transform Group, and partner and co-founder of Cool Pool Fund. Great to have you on. Thanks for joining us. >> Yeah, thanks for having me. >> So you're on the Women's Panel. I saw you up there: Women in Crypto one of our big focus areas this year, as well as Crypto for Good. So super excited to have a conversation with you, but first take a step back. Introduce yourself, what are you workin' on? What's cool? What's gettin' you excited in the space, in life? What is the crypto thing? What does it mean to you? >> Sure, so I lived in San Francisco in 2011, so I had a bunch of nerd friends, and you know, I heard about this crazy crypto currency called Bitcoin. I had free office space for my startup, so that meant free electricity, so I was like, oh, let's start mining, 'cause we have free electricity. You know, we're not really raisin' money with this thing. (laughter) And I ended up not doing that. I thought that'd be a jerk thing, but I'd be retired by now, so kind of regretting that decision. So 2012, I met the people who were re-launching the first American bitcoin exchange, Trade Hill. I ended up joining that, and at that time, I used to say, oh, I'm the leading woman in bitcoin, but I was also the only woman in bitcoin. (laughter) And then after that, I ended up co-founding another bitcoin exchange called Alpha Coin, which pivoted still around, and then I co-founded another exchange called Magnetico, pivoted also still around, and then I joined Transform Group as EVP, and we're the leading PR firm in the bitcoin and blockchain ICO space. So we've done most of the big ICOs. We did Ethereum, Auger, Made Safe, Gollum, Nosis, Quantum, Unicoin, Wax, Bancor, et cetera. We've done over 70, 60 at this point, so I have a lot of experience seeing ICOs, how they've kind of changed and evolved. Then I started a pre-ICO syndicate, so getting in before the public sale, getting a super discount, which then turned into a fund, because people were like, can I just give you money? This is really complicated, like I don't know what I'm doing, so I was like forced. My hand was forced. (chuckling) >> Yeah, I'll take your cash. Just send it to me. No contract. >> Well no no no, actually the space, you really have to have a team of lawyers. It, you know, they're not too big to fail. >> Just take the cash and say you were hacked, and then disappear, right? >> Yeah you know, that's getting a little more difficult to do that. It looks like they're tracking now. >> Margaux wouldn't steal electricity. (laughter) She's not going to do that. >> That's actually true. >> Of course, I'm being facetious. I'm a comedian, for crying out loud. I'm trying to get her on a roll, here. Okay, funniest story in crypto for you right now that you've seen, could be back in history in time. >> Yeah. >> What's the funniest thing you've seen? Or the most outrageous thing? >> Is this PG? Or like, what can I? >> It's Internet, it's unrated. It's NC-17 or unrated. >> Alright, you mean the time when one of the crypto, hedge fund people took a ton of liquid acid and then I had to take care of him, and he ended up eating all of my birth control pills, and I had to take him to the hospital because I thought he was going to die. (laughter) So that was pretty crazy. >> Anchor: OD'd on birth control pills. That's a first. >> That would be a first. >> 'Cause the only person that was awake at the time that I could ask who was a chemist and who was an EMT said his body temperature, but when I took him to the hospital, the nurses, I thought he was going to die, and then the nurses are all like, well, he's not going to get his period. (laughter) >> That's for sure. >> I'm like, is he going to die? They're like, bring him back if he's spotting. (laughter) I'm like, so he's okay? He's alright? And so, yeah, it was fun, they were like, we're more worried about the acid. So, yeah that's I guess maybe up there in the top five. >> So you've seen 60, 70, you've seen a lot. You've got a good observation space. Tell us what that's like, I mean, public relations for me is hard, like messaging, I don't have that gene, as you know, John. So, how have you been able to shape it. Do you get a lot of 'em and just go oh no, these guys really need tons of help, or take us through some of the examples, maybe not specifically but just generally how you would approach that problem. >> Sure, so first of all, we don't just take anyone. We do vetting and it has to have a story we can sell. Luckily at our firm, we have a lot of people, including the founder Michael Turpin and myself, who have a background in this space, so we understand really what they're saying. And our job, really, is to break it down so regular people understand what the heck we're talking about and why it's important. So I think a lot of, part of the problem with people not getting into crypto currency is that they get too hung up on the technical details. You know, I don't know how my television turns on. I don't know how my debit card works. There's so many things we do without knowing the technical backgrounds of it, and we don't get hung up on that. And for some reason, this industry, people get really hung up on the technology instead of understanding the uses and the purpose of it, and so that's what we really do. We talk about what is the purpose of this? How is this important? How is this changing an industry? And relating it, maybe, to news that's going on right then. So it's really just making it understandable to regular people. >> Yeah, some of the women in crypto conversation, women in tech >> Sure. >> Dave and I have a passion for this because we have a lot of women friends that are either executives and or in good positions, and we interview them, like they were a guy. So we never really got into that whole thing. Turns out we got a big library of women in tech, and it's been so politicized and it's so important. And certainly we agree that, you got to do all that, but if we're even having the conversation, that makes it a problem. So at what point, then, do we need to do kind of keep the vibe going to saying, okay, let's focus on positive, and what's your just view of how to make it engaging, 'cause women make up 50% of the population. >> Yeah. >> And so, what do we do? >> First, I want to say, there are actually some badass women in crypto. Two of the biggest ICOs had female founders. They're Bancor and Tezos. I would say more than you would expect, but they're not as loud and brash as I am, so it might be harder for you to see them. Conferences definitely need to be putting more women on these panels. >> This conference here has a lot of representation, by far, really strong. >> Yeah, well, to be honest, like putting me on a Women in Blockchain panel. I love talking to women, and it's inspiring them, and telling them you can do it, 'cause part of the thing is, nobody's a blockchain expert, alright? There's no such thing because it's just changing so fast. There's too much information out there. And I think sometimes women get hung up on needing to know everything before they do something, and I like to say, you know, probably 80% of the men here have no idea what they're talking about. So, you don't have to >> John: I mean, always be learning in this space. This is an evolution. >> Yeah, and in doing, when I first got into this space and started the first American bitcoin exchange, I didn't even know what an exchange was, you know? But I met one of the co-founders of YouTube, who was into bitcoin, who had a fund, and I ended up leveraging that to get into this, and I learned as I went, and what's so exciting right now about blockchain is that it's really integrated in pretty much every industry you can imagine. I mean, people are doing ICOs in health care, in fashion, in anything you can think of. So if you have experience and skills in one industry, you can then leverage that in another. So if you're a woman in finance, guess what? If you join someone's ICO, and they have someone from a traditional finance world, you're lending credibility, and that's valuable. And that kind of experience, and we need to bring more mature industries into blockchain. >> This is what I think, I mean, you've heard me say this, like never before, you could see, because it's digital, because it's data, as blockchain is, people can traverse industries like never before. >> Yeah. >> It used to be, if you're in health care, you're in health care for life, that's it. >> Yeah. >> But some of the digital skills that people are learning are applicable to other industries. Do you feel like, I think you just said it, that that will promote more woman involvement. You're saying it's disproportionately high here. I don't know. >> I thought it was a little interesting that they put me on a Women in Blockchain panel instead of putting me on a panel that I could talk about my experience, since I have a lot. >> Dave: That's my point. >> Instead of that. >> Winning Women, or whatever, I mean. >> Well, I wouldn't segregate all the women into one panel. I would want to put them on other panels, I mean. >> Yeah, I mean you want to put them on panels where there are pros, and they can do the job independently. >> Exactly. >> Just being a player. >> Alright, Margaux. >> A lot of women say that though. They say, let's not make this about women in tech or you know Lara Logan, and that crew, Naomi Tutu. It all depends >> And so their social justice gene >> but I'm curious how do you feel about that? It was shining a light on whether it's women in tech or women in crypto, does that, is that offensive to you? Do you welcome that? Some welcome it, others? >> I think it's weird because I've been in this industry for so long, and now I think it's good that it's becoming a topic, but it was never anything that I even paid attention to. In fact, I'd rather focus on the positives, 'cause being a woman in this industry is great because, guess what, I can just say whatever I want. I can get away with saying things and calling out the elephant in the room where most men can't. But it's, I think part of the problem is these guys here want to hire women, but how do they find them? And I just had someone come up to me from Zedd saying, we want to hire a female CMO, like how do we find that? And the jobs are out there, it's about being able to get these women who want to do this and connecting them to opportunities. bUt on the other hand, women really need to be more assertive and be like hey, I don't know anything about blockchain, but I want to learn. So I'm going to go to a conference instead of being like I don't know anything, and I'm scared, so I don't want to go to a conference, you know? Like I said, most men don't know what they're talking about here. >> Well I mean, everyone's learning. We're trying to figure it out. Margaux, thanks for coming on, appreciate it. >> Yeah, thank you so much. I really appreciate it. >> We're looking for the stand-up comedian act. We'll get that on our next episode Thanks for comin' on. >> Yeah! And check out my videos, too, if you want. >> Alright, what's your YouTube address? >> It's youtube.com/margauxwithanx. Thank you. >> Alright, we'll put it on the blog. We'll be back with more live coverage after this short break. (electronic music)

Published Date : Mar 2 2018

SUMMARY :

it's theCUBE, covering Polygon 18, brought to you Great to have you on. I saw you up there: Women in Crypto and you know, I heard about this crazy Just send it to me. you really have to have a team of lawyers. Yeah you know, that's getting a little She's not going to do that. Okay, funniest story in crypto for you right now It's Internet, it's unrated. and then I had to take care of him, and he ended up That's a first. the nurses, I thought he was going to die, and then the I'm like, is he going to die? I don't have that gene, as you know, John. and the purpose of it, and so that's what we really do. And certainly we agree that, you got to do all that, I would say more than you would expect, This conference here has a lot of representation, and I like to say, you know, probably 80% of the men here This is an evolution. I didn't even know what an exchange was, you know? like never before, you could see, because it's digital, It used to be, if you're in health care, Do you feel like, I think you just said it, I thought it was a little interesting I would want to put them on other panels, I mean. Yeah, I mean you want to put them on panels or you know Lara Logan, and that crew, Naomi Tutu. so I don't want to go to a conference, you know? Well I mean, everyone's learning. Yeah, thank you so much. We're looking for the stand-up comedian act. And check out my videos, too, if you want. It's youtube.com/margauxwithanx. after this short break.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Michael TurpinPERSON

0.99+

MargauxPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

Transform GroupORGANIZATION

0.99+

Margaux AvedisianPERSON

0.99+

TwoQUANTITY

0.99+

2011DATE

0.99+

PolymaxORGANIZATION

0.99+

Cool Pool FundORGANIZATION

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

BahamasLOCATION

0.99+

Naomi TutuPERSON

0.99+

80%QUANTITY

0.99+

Lara LoganPERSON

0.99+

2012DATE

0.99+

AugerORGANIZATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

UnicoinORGANIZATION

0.99+

Made SafeORGANIZATION

0.99+

BancorORGANIZATION

0.99+

Alpha CoinORGANIZATION

0.99+

Trade HillORGANIZATION

0.99+

MagneticoORGANIZATION

0.99+

NosisORGANIZATION

0.99+

GollumORGANIZATION

0.99+

FirstQUANTITY

0.99+

ZeddPERSON

0.99+

QuantumORGANIZATION

0.99+

TezosORGANIZATION

0.98+

WaxORGANIZATION

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

one panelQUANTITY

0.98+

one industryQUANTITY

0.98+

60QUANTITY

0.97+

NassauLOCATION

0.97+

youtube.com/margauxwithanxOTHER

0.97+

EVPORGANIZATION

0.97+

AmericanOTHER

0.96+

NC-17OTHER

0.96+

over 70QUANTITY

0.96+

this yearDATE

0.96+

70QUANTITY

0.95+

Polygon 18COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.9+

Transform Group & CooLPool FundORGANIZATION

0.88+

2018DATE

0.86+

EthereumORGANIZATION

0.82+

PolyConEVENT

0.81+

a ton of liquid acidQUANTITY

0.79+

50% ofQUANTITY

0.78+

top fiveQUANTITY

0.77+

EVPPERSON

0.72+

PolyconORGANIZATION

0.64+

bitcoinOTHER

0.63+

18COMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.53+

theCUBECOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.43+

CubeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.43+

Ashley Roach, Cisco DevNet | Cisco Live EU 2018


 

>> Announcer: Live from Barcelona, Spain, it's theCUBE, covering Cisco Live 2018, brought to you by Cisco, Veen and theCUBE's ecosystem partners. (upbeat electronic music) >> Hey, welcome back, everyone, to our live coverage from theCUBE here in Barcelona, Spain, for exclusive coverage of Cisco Live 2018 in Europe. I'm John Furrier, cofounder and cohost of theCUBE, with my cohost this week, Stu Miniman. Been to many events also, senior analyst at wikibon.com. Stu and I have been breaking down all the action here in the DevNet zone. And we have with us here as our guest, Ashley Roach, who is a principal engineer and evangelist with Cisco. DevNet himself, has full view of what's going on. Welcome to theCUBE. >> Hey, thanks for having me. Appreciate it. >> Good to see you again. We covered DevNet Create, which was really our first foray into what DevNet was doing outside of the Cisco ecosystem, bringing that cloud-native developer into the Cisco fold. Here, it's the Cisco show where all the Cisco ecosystem and your customers are growing into the cloud and programming with DevNet. So congratulations, it's been phenomenal. It's been one of the top stories we've been covering as DevNet has just been explosive. >> Oh, thanks a lot. It's been a lot of hard work. >> People have been learning, they're coding, they're being inspired, and they're connecting, It's a very sharing culture. Props to you guys and the team. Well done. >> Ashley: Appreciate it. >> So what is DevNet? I mean, this is a cultural shift. We've been reporting on theCUBE all year and last year. But really this year, end of last year, we started really putting the stake in the ground saying we are going to see a renaissance in software development. Linux foundations, reporting that there's going to be exponential growth in code and open-source. You seeing that you can create intellectual property with only 10% of the energy codewise, 90% using open-source. They call that the code sandwich. Again, this is just data that they're sharing, but it points to the bigger trend. Developers are becoming the important part of the equation, and the integration of the stack from network to application, are working together. And again, proof point's there, things like Kubernetes, containers, have obviously been out there for a long time. You're starting to see the visibility for developers. >> Right. >> John: You're at Cisco, you're in the middle of all this. You're seeing one side of the camp and the other. >> Ashley: Yeah. >> What's your view? >> Yeah, I think that's a good, it captures a lot of the dynamics that are going on right now in the environments. And I mean, for me, I come at this from an application developer standpoint. I actually, when I joined Cisco, I was not a hardware guy at all (laughs) Frankly, I'm not even now. I'm much more oriented towards software, and so when we've seen, though, sort of the power of the underlying infrastructure that gets married up to some of these overlay systems like Kubernetes and containers, more and more of the infrastructure on one hand is getting abstracted, which you might think, oh, uh oh. Like, that's a problem. But in reality, the infrastructure still needs to be there, right? You can't run your serverless function out of thin air. >> John: Yeah. >> At least not yet. >> John: It's truly not serverless. There's servers somewhere. >> Yeah, exactly. So, you know, those are the funny jokes that we like to have in the industry, right? But at the same time, you want to think like, okay, well I'm writing my application, I'm a developer. I don't want to know about infrastructure. My whole job is I don't care about that. But there is information and utility in the data that you can get from the infrastructure because at some point, your application will fail. You may have some bugs, and yeah, Kubernetes may kill your container and bring up another one. But you still need to de-bug that issue, and so yeah, you can get tracking, you can get analytics. But also, you can get that stuff from that infrastructure that's underlying it. And so, like one of the presentations I'm doing tomorrow, I wrote just kind of a proof of concept sample app where it's a Spring Boot app that has a built-in health check capability. It ties into APIC-EM and or DNA Center and uses that information that's available about the network. So maybe it's your, from your firewall to your application, you can run a path trace and just have that happen every five minutes or something like that, or check the health of an entire environment every, you know, so often. And then your application can resolve issues or have just data about it so that we can keep moving. >> Yeah, actually, you know, I love that comment you talked, you know, you're not a hardware person, and that's okay. >> Ashley: Right. >> And there's lots of people here at the Cisco show that aren't. That's a change from just a few years ago. How is that dynamic changing? You know, I remember for a few years I was arguing like every networking person needs to become a coder and there's, you know, push back and people are scared and what's going to happen to my job and can I learn that skill set? >> Ashley: Right. >> The bar for entry seems pretty low these days but how do we translate some of those languages? >> Yeah, I think that perception of say, an ops person becoming a programmer, it's not really the right mindset. >> Right. >> There's a couple mindsets, though, that are important. So one of the things we're trying to do is foster the DevOps culture somewhat. And to do that, an ops person has to understand and have empathy for the problems that exist on the application side and vice versa. So for us, we're just trying to education people in that vein. >> John: Yeah. >> But all of the infrastructure is now also automatable and you don't have to automate at low level. You can automate it with things like Ansible, which is a bit more accessible for people that haven't been programming for a long time. So, you know, I think those are the things that we see and that we're trying to encourage within our community and just broadly speaking, I would say, in the industry. >> You brought up empathy, interesting. Because this is a cultural shift, right? So this mindset, this cultural DNA, you have to have empathy. But it's kind of like the Venn diagram. Empathy is one circle. >> Ashley: Mhm. >> Feasibility is another and viability is the other, right? >> Ashley: Mhm. >> So it's always in context to what you can get done, right? So you guys at DevNet have a good view of the development environment. What are some of the challenges and what are the opportunities for folks in the Cisco ecosystem to get their hands dirty, get down and dirty with the tech-- >> Ashley: Oh, yeah. >> Where they can do feasible, viable projects that are possible. Well, seeing Python certainly is one approach. Great for data wrangling, but you know, you got Node.js out there, has been a great language. >> Ashley: Yep. >> App guys are doing Node.js because of JavaScript in server-side. >> Ashley: Yep. >> You got a lot of IO that sounds like a network service mindset. Is there things that you see going on around that what's possible and what's kind of moonshot like projects and where should people start? >> Well, I think, again, kind of going to this historical point of view, it used to be you had one programming book and you're sitting there, you know, late at night copying code from that. And maybe it came with a CD and you could download, you know, your sample code onto your hard drive. And then, you know, you'd be sitting there flipping back and forth and then you hit an issue. You're like, I don't know what to do. Maybe you're trying to teach yourself. I don't have any friends that are programmers. I mean, today, with, I built the vast amount of resources that are available online. You know, like, we have our DevNet Learning Labs. And so that's the set of tutorials that we've provided, but that's not the only thing out there. You've got Code School, Codeacademy. You've got the loops out there. I mean, shoot, MIT, Stanford, they're all putting their courseware in open-source. So the universe of educational material for people to understand this stuff and get started is really, really awesome now. And then also, it's easier than ever, I think,. to actually code because you're, again, like code is becoming more and more abstract at higher level languages. So Python, Node.js, those are still kind of low level, but there are packages on top of those, you know, middleware and Node.js, to build a web server. You get Express or sales or whatever, and then you're kind of off to the races. Like Spring Boot is crazy. It used to be Spring was a bit of a pain in the butt with, you know-- >> Yeah. >> Ashley: All the dependency, injection and everything. But with Spring Boot, now you just add, you know, a dependency, and you've got an entire web framework or an authorization framework or whatever. And that was like, I was pretty blown away when I started seeing-- >> So it's a lot easier. >> It's, yeah, it's just a lot easier. Things are more curated. You have certain stacks. You know, it used to be LAMP stack, now you got ELK stack for data things, you got, you know, and so on. So the universe is wide open for a lot of people to program today. >> So Ashley, love the training angles that you talked about there. But what I bring to mind, a little bit orthogonal to what we've been talking about here-- >> Ashley: Ooh, good programmer buzzword there. >> But one that John and I have been asking about, you mentioned open-source. >> Yes. >> So obviously, things like Spring, lot of things you mentioned are open-source. >> Yes. >> But what about Cisco's, you know, involvement in the community, giving back to open-source. What's the philosophical, you know, viewpoint-- >> Yeah. >> From Cisco's standpoint? >> Yeah, we're active in open-source. We're big contributors to OpenStack, for example. You know, we've got some of, we've created like a CNI module for Kubernetes called Contiv. And so that's in open-source. We, you know, in DevNet, we publish tons of things in open-source, just code samples and you know, example projects and so on. Cisco's actually a big contributor to the Linux kernel, so it's a long legacy of open-source at Cisco. So it's part of our culture. >> So there's no restrictions on everybody going on GitHub, throwing their stuff in, being part of the communities-- >> There's certainly restrictions. Yeah, we have processes that we're supposed to follow. I mean, we got to protect the intellectual property when we need to. I mean, it's the way it is for working at a company. But at the same time, you know, there is viable processes if it makes business sense to open-source things. >> I mean, the line John's used, you know, for the last year or so, is GitHub, that's people's resumes these days. >> Yeah, absolutely. >> So we want to make sure, what I'm saying is it sounds like the ecosystem at Cisco, friendly for the developers to come in, participate. You got a business to run, obviously. Legal keeps their eye on stuff, but you know, Cisco's out there. We saw it in the container ecosystem, OpenStack-- >> Ashley: Yes. >> Stu: Kubernetes, Linux, absolutely-- >> Yeah. >> Stu: Not just even in networking but beyond that. See a lot of Cisco out there, so-- >> Yeah, great. >> So my question for you, personal question. If you could talk to your 22 year old self right now-- >> Ashley: Oh, wow, yeah. >> You're high school, actually, you're college or college graduate, what would you say to yourself knowing what you know now? 'Cause this is a really interesting point. I mean, at my age, we used to build stuff straight up from the bottom of the stack to the top, and it was a lot of heavy lifting. Now you're really kind of getting into some engineering here and then some composite Lego block kind of thinking where these frameworks could just snap together. Sometimes (mumbles) But it's a lot cooler now. I mean, I wish I was 22. What would you say to your 22 year old self out there? What would you advise yourself? What would you say to yourself? >> Where's my smoking jacket? (John laughs) Yeah, so, I mean, I was a liberal arts undergrad and I did take computer programming classes. So I did a couple courses in C toward the end of my time in university, and that's because I've always been interested in technical, you know, in programming and stuff. But I think probably I would have maybe stayed another year to try to maybe get an actual CS degree. So that might be one thing, I think the other-- >> John: What would you jump on today if you saw all of this awesome code, open-source? I mean, like, it's like open bar in the coding party. I mean-- >> Yeah, it's overwhelming. >> It's so many things to jump on and-- >> You know, obviously, joking, I should say blockchain and machine learning and AI, right? But actually, I would say the machine learning and AI stuff is probably a good, interesting, you know, wave of technology, yeah. >> I just want to, you know, we're talking about your 22 year old self. How about your kids? >> Ashley: Yeah. >> You're working with your kids, checking out your GitHub on there. So, you know, maybe share, you know, younger people. You know, how do they get involved? In the keynote yesterday, it was, you know, jobs of the future. >> Right, well, yeah. For my kids, I have two daughters. And so, I try to encourage them to at least be familiar with coding. I've tried to teach them Linux some, but we've done programming classes, but it's kind of hard sometimes to get them interested in something like programming, to be honest. So some of it's trying to be creative problem solvers, trying to craft that sort of attitude, you know. So that then, when they do get the opportunity to do some programming, that they'll be interested about it. >> I mean, the young kids love gaming. Gaming's a good way to get people in. >> Yep. >> VR is now an interesting-- >> I mean, Minecraft and Sims, those are the two that my oldest daughter loves. I mean, the thing I remember that's the funniest was when you know, of course, this was when we all got computers back in the day and we did keyboards, right, in order to do stuff. So I got the first iPad when it came out and I brought it home and my daughter, who was, I think, six or eight at the time, she's like, "Cool, I understand this." Like automatically understood it. But then, she went to the TV and it had icons on it. So she walked up to the TV and tried to do that, and I was like, "Oh, that's funny." Like her mental model is this. >> Yeah. >> Where our mental model was that and so on earlier on. >> My oldest son says, "Dad, search engine is so your generation," (Ashley laughs) Not even email, like search, Google search. >> Yeah, the digital, it's like the digital native thing. On the other hand, we actually are fairly restrictive about like cell phone and mobile because it's a lot. That sort of thing. They really, really are going to face some interesting, I don't know, social, you know, the social things that you have in high school and middle school now multiplied and amplified through all that. We're sort of cautious, too, as parents, you know. >> Lot of societal issues to deal with. Alright, now getting back to DevNet here, I want to get your thoughts because we had a big setup here. One of the things that the folks people can't see on camera is we're in the DevNet zone. You see behind us, but there's everywhere else around. It's really the big story at Cisco Live and has been for awhile. Every year it gets bigger. It's like, it keeps growing in interest. What do you guys show here? What's the purpose? Give a little quick, take a minute to explain the DevNet approach this year-- >> Okay. >> John: And how it's different-- >> Yeah. >> John: And how you guys take this going forward. >> So the DevNet zone, philosophically, we tried to have the experiential. We don't want people to come in here and get death by PowerPoint of hey, check out this awesome new product that we created. You know, that kind of thing. >> Yeah. >> Instead, we want people to come in and have the opportunity to sit down, either by themselves or with a friend or, you know, with one of us to be able to work through sort of tutorials so that we have this area of the Learning Labs or learn about the DevNet sandbox. That's another area that we have where that is a sort of try it out, live, always-on, cloud service that we provide for anyone. We also have, of course, examples of example use cases. So we have some IOT and collaboration use cases that we're demonstrating in the new APIs that have come out of those products that you wouldn't think may be necessarily, oh, collaboration and IOT really are connected. But in fact, you know, ultimately you need to get a human involved when you have exceptions. And in a lot of cases like for edge compute scenarios, it's exception oriented. So when we, the example that we have here is we have a truck that's sitting on a handcrafted scale that's like a raspberry pie thing that one of our evangelists, Casey Bleeker, made. And it's putting, you know, analog data into our container that's running on an edge device. And when an exception occurs when the scale has this truck on it with too many stones in the back, then it triggers an alert. It creates a team room for people to come and escalate and discuss. It'll make a phone call automatically to the truck driver and pull people together to deal with that situation. But then, additionally, we have a new room capabilities with like, our telepresence systems. And that has face identification, not like from identifying the user standpoint, but it knows it can count how many people are in the room, for example. So if you combine that sort of IOT capability with this collaboration unit that's going to already be there, you're getting kind of a win-win of that infrastructure in the rooms. >> Ashley, talked about there's so many different things going on there, what's exciting you the most? Where are you seeing the most people, you know, gravitating around? >> Yeah, in the DevNet zone in general? >> Well, it can be here or in general, yeah. >> Well, I think one thing in the DevNet zone, we also have a white hat black hat challenge. So that's been very, very popular. What we're doing is demonstrating using, you know, off the shelf hacker tools, how vulnerable some IOT devices are to give people. It's kind of a you've heard about it, now experience it and do it yourself to see how easy it really is. And then see, of course, how our solutions can help you mitigate those problems. So that's, you know, IOT security is a big concern, I think, in general, and so I think that's an exciting spot for people-- >> So hands-on learning, very people-oriented, very open-- >> Yes, yep. >> The motto I love, I'm reading on the thing there, learn code, inspire, connect. So learn, toe in the water, connect-- >> Ashley: Yes. >> Share. >> Yeah. >> Mentor, collaborate. >> The other thing that we're sort of soft launching, I guess, is we have a new application developer site on DevNet, and so-- >> John: What's the URL? >> It is developer.cisco.com/site/app-dev. >> John: Okay, that's good. Memorize that, quiz later. >> Yeah. >> That's long, just search. >> Yeah, right, right. >> Hey, Alexa. >> Right, so, but with that, we're trying to make it easier for people to understand the use cases for what kinds of applications they can build using our technology. So indoor location, using kind of doing maps and heat maps and building that kind of scenario, for example. >> Awesome. >> Ashley: Through T-Mobile and video and such. >> As you are evangelizing your engine on the engineering side, what's the plans going forward? Post-event, obviously, you've got Cisco Live in Orlando this year, it's in 2018. >> Ashley: Yeah, we have-- >> But you guys got a lot of these going on, you got a lot of digital content. What's the outreach plan? Where should people expect to see you guys? Share the going forward plan. >> Yeah, I wish I knew where everyone was going to be. So thankfully, on the website-- >> They're on the internet! >> We have an events calendar, so I would definitely encourage you to look there if you're interested in connecting with one of us. We have the Cisco Live in Melbourne then Orlando. We also have DevNet Create in April and that's in Mountain View, I think, Bay Area. So would love to have people come out to that, and kind of the theme of that last year, which was the inaugural one, continues this year, which is where apps need infrastructure. So we want to kind of continue this conversation about DevOps, how, you know, applications and infrastructure-- >> John: Yeah. >> Can benefit each other. >> And just for the folks watching, theCUBE was at the inaugural DevNet Create. We'll be there again, we'll also be in Orlando. And again, this is important, we'll end on this point. I'd like you to take a minute to explain the difference between DevNet and DevNet Create because this is really interesting. I like the way you guys are doing this. It's really open, but it's pretty transparent. So share the difference between DevNet and DevNet Create. >> Yeah, so DevNet is our developer program, and so that's a website-- >> Before Cisco and-- >> It's Cisco, it's oriented towards those things. DevNet Create is more about forming a community to solve these problems about applications and infrastructure. So that intersection, whether you call it DevOps, whether you call it I don't know what, potatoes and you know, something. Something in there, you know, there is this fluid spot where applications are looking more like infrastructure, infrastructure is starting to look more like applications. So what does that mean and how do we explore that together to, you know-- >> We call it cloud-native. >> Ashley: Yeah. >> It's a set of developers who just, like you, don't really want to get involved in network but love it to be more magical. >> Right. >> Right? And Cisco folks love Cisco because they're in that world, right? So-- >> Yes. >> To me, it's really interesting you guys do that. Congratulations. >> Yeah, thanks. And it's not just for Cisco people, right? So Cisco Live and DevNet Zone is that. For Create, it's actually the inverse. We encourage people from the community to come and check it out as opposed to the-- >> John: Props to you guys, great stuff. Cisco, DevNet Zone is where theCUBE is. Of course DevNet Create is going to be outside of the Cisco ecosystem. Connecting the two is really the key. We're living in a world, global connected devices, connected people, that's the mission of Cisco. Love that vision, but of course, we're theCUBE, bringing you the live content here in Barcelona. All, of course, is available online, youtube.com/siliconangle. Of course, thecube.net is our new site. Check it out. I'm John Furrier with Stu Miniman. More live coverage coming from Barcelona with theCUBE after this short break. (upbeat electronic music)

Published Date : Jan 31 2018

SUMMARY :

covering Cisco Live 2018, brought to you by Cisco, Stu and I have been breaking down all the action Hey, thanks for having me. Good to see you again. It's been a lot of hard work. Props to you guys and the team. You seeing that you can create intellectual property You're seeing one side of the camp and the other. it captures a lot of the dynamics that are going on John: It's truly not serverless. But at the same time, you want to think like, Yeah, actually, you know, I love that comment you talked, and there's, you know, push back and people are scared becoming a programmer, it's not really the right mindset. So one of the things we're trying to do and you don't have to automate at low level. But it's kind of like the Venn diagram. So it's always in context to what you can get done, right? Great for data wrangling, but you know, because of JavaScript in server-side. Is there things that you see going on around that And then, you know, you'd be sitting there But with Spring Boot, now you just add, you know, So the universe is wide open that you talked about there. you mentioned open-source. lot of things you mentioned are open-source. What's the philosophical, you know, viewpoint-- just code samples and you know, example projects and so on. But at the same time, you know, there is viable processes I mean, the line John's used, you know, friendly for the developers to come in, participate. See a lot of Cisco out there, so-- If you could talk to your 22 year old self right now-- What would you say to your 22 year old self out there? interested in technical, you know, in programming and stuff. I mean, like, it's like open bar in the coding party. is probably a good, interesting, you know, I just want to, you know, we're talking about In the keynote yesterday, it was, you know, but it's kind of hard sometimes to get them interested in I mean, the young kids love gaming. I mean, the thing I remember that's the funniest was when "Dad, search engine is so your generation," I don't know, social, you know, the social things One of the things that the folks people can't see on camera So the DevNet zone, and have the opportunity to sit down, either by themselves So that's, you know, IOT security is a big concern, The motto I love, I'm reading on the thing there, John: Okay, that's good. for people to understand the use cases for what kinds As you are evangelizing your engine Where should people expect to see you guys? So thankfully, on the website-- and kind of the theme of that last year, I like the way you guys are doing this. So that intersection, whether you call it DevOps, but love it to be more magical. To me, it's really interesting you guys do that. We encourage people from the community to come John: Props to you guys, great stuff.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
AshleyPERSON

0.99+

Ashley RoachPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

90%QUANTITY

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

22 yearQUANTITY

0.99+

Spring BootTITLE

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

OrlandoLOCATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

AprilDATE

0.99+

PythonTITLE

0.99+

MITORGANIZATION

0.99+

MelbourneLOCATION

0.99+

Node.jsTITLE

0.99+

StuPERSON

0.99+

StanfordORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

this yearDATE

0.99+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.99+

MinecraftTITLE

0.99+

Barcelona, SpainLOCATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

T-MobileORGANIZATION

0.99+

developer.cisco.com/site/app-devOTHER

0.99+

sixQUANTITY

0.99+

Mountain ViewLOCATION

0.99+

DevNetORGANIZATION

0.99+

Eric Herzog, IBM | Cisco Live EU 2018


 

>> Announcer: Live from Barcelona, Spain it's theCUBE covering Cisco Live 2018. Brought to you by Cisco, Veeam, and theCUBE's ecosystem partners. >> Hello everyone and welcome back. This is theCUBE live here in Barcelona for Cisco Live Europe. I'm John Furrier, the co-host of theCUBE, with Stu Miniman analyst at Wikibon, covering networking storage and all infrastructure cloud. Stu Miniman, Stu. Our next guest is Eric Herzog, who's the Chief Marketing Officer at IBM Storage Systems. Eric, CUBE alumni, he's been on so many times I can't even count. You get the special VIP badge. We're here breaking down all the top stories at Cisco Live in Europe, kicking off 2018. Although it's the European show, not the big show, certainly kicking off the year with a lot of new concepts that aren't necessarily new, but they're innovative. Eric, welcome to theCUBE again. >> Well, thank you. We always love participating in theCUBE. IBM is a strong supporter of theCUBE and all the things you do for us, so thank you very much for having us again. >> A lot of great thought leadership from IBM, really appreciate you guys' support over the years. But now we're in a sea change. IBM had their first quarter of great results, and that will be well-reported on SiliconANGLE, but the sea change is happening. You've been living this generation, you've seen couple cycles in the past. Cisco putting forth a vision of the future, which is pretty right on. They were right on Internet of Things ten years ago, they had it all right, but they're a networking company that's transformed up the stack over the years. Now on the front lines of no perimeter, okay, more security challenges, cloud big whales with no networking and storage. You're in the middle of it. Break it down. Why is Cisco Live so important now than ever before? >> Well, for us it's very important because one, we have a strategic relationship with Cisco, the Storage Division does a product with Cisco called the VersaStack, converged infrastructure, and in fact one of our key constituents for the VersaStack are MSPs and CSPs, which is a key constituent of Cisco, especially with their emphasis on the cloud. Second thing for us is IBM storage has gone heavily cloud. So going heavily cloud with our software, in addition to what we do with our solutions as a foundation for CSPs and MSPs. Just what we've integrated into our software-defined storage for cloud makes Cisco Live an ideal venue for us, and Cisco an ideal partner. >> So I've got to ask you, we've had conversations on theCUBE before, they're all on youtube.com/siliconangle, just search Eric Herzog, you'll find them. But I want to recycle this one point and get your comments and reaction here in Barcelona. You guys have transformed with software at IBM big-time with storage. Okay, you're positioned well for the cloud. What's the most important thing that companies have to do, like IBM and Cisco, to play an innovator role in the cloud game as we have software at the center of the value proposition? >> Well I think the key thing is, when you look at cloud infrastructure, first of all, the cloud's got to run on something. So you need some sort of structural, infrastructure foundation. Servers, networking, and compute. So at IBM and with Cisco, we're positioning ourselves as the ideal rock-solid foundation for the cloud building, if you will. So that's item number one. Item number two, our software in particular can survive, not only on premises, but can bridge and go from on-premise to a public cloud, creating a hybrid infrastructure, and that allows us to also run cloud instantiation. Several of our products are available from IBM Cloud Division, Amazon offers some of the IBM storage software, over three hundred cloud service providers, smaller ones, offer IBM Spectrum Protect as a back-up service. So we've already morphed into storage software, either A, bridging the cloud in a hybrid config, or being used by cloud providers as some of their storage offerings for end-users and businesses. >> Eric, wanted to get to, one of the partnership areas that you've talked about with Cisco is VersaStack. We've talked with you a number of times about converged infrastructure, that partnership, Cisco UCS taking all the virtualization. The buzz in the market, there's a lot of discussion, oh it's hyper-converged, it's cloud. Why is converged infrastructure still relevant today? >> Well, when you look at the analysts that track the numbers, you can see that the overall converged market is growing and hyper-converged is viewed as a subset. When you look at those numbers, this year close to 17 billion US, about 75% of it is still standard converged versus hyper-converged. One of the other differences, it's the right tool for the right job. So customers need to go in eyes open. So when you do a hyper-converged infrastructure, by the way IBM offers a hyper-converged infrastructure currently with Nutanix, so we actually have both, the Nutanix partnership offering hyper-converged and a partnership with Cisco on standard converged. It's really, how do you size the right tool for the right job? And one of the negatives of hyper-converged, very easy to deploy, that's great, but one of the negatives is every time you need more storage, you have to add more server. Every time you need more server, you add more storage. With this traditional converged infrastructure, you can add servers only, or networking only, or storage only. So I think when you're in certain configurations, workloads, and applications, hyper-converged is the right solution, IBM's got a solution. In other situations, particularly as your middle-sized and bigger apps, regular converged is better 'cause you can basically parse and size up or down compute, networking, and the storage independent of each other, whereas in hyper-converged you have to do it at the same time. And that's a negative where you're either over-buying your storage when you don't need it, or you're over-buying your compute when you don't need it. With standard converged, you don't have that issue. You buy what you need when you need it. But I think most big companies, for sure, have certain workloads that are best with hyper-converged, and we've got that, and other workloads that are best with converged, and we have that as well. >> Okay, the other big growth area in storage for the last bunch of years has been flash. IBM's got a strong position in all-flash arrays. What's new there, how are some of the technologies changing? Any impact on the network that we should be really understanding at this show? >> Sure, so couple things. So first of all, we just brought out some very high-density all-flash arrays in Q4. We can put 220 terabytes in two rack U, which is a building block that we use in several different of our all-flash configurations, including our all-flash VersaStack. The other thing we do is we embed software-defined storage on our, software-defined storage actually on our physical all-flash arrays. Most companies don't do that, so they've got an all-flash offering and if they have a software-defined offering it's actually a different piece of software. For us it's the same, so it's easier to deploy, it's easier to train, it's easier to license, it's easier for a reseller to sell if you happen to be using a reseller. And the other thing is it's battle-hardened, because it's not only standalone software, but it's actually on the arrays as well. So from a test infrastructure quality issue, versus other vendors that have certain software that goes on their all-flash array, and then a different set of software for all software-defined. It doesn't make logical sense when you can cover it with one thing. So that's an important difference for us, and a big innovator. I think the last thing you're going to see that does impact networking is the rise of NVMe over fabrics. IBM did a statement of direction last May outlining what we're doing. We did a public demonstration of an InfiniBand fabric at the AI summit in New York in December, and we will be having an announcement around NVMe fabrics on the 20th of February. So stay tuned to hear us then. We'll be launching some more NVMe with fabric infrastructure at that time. >> Eric, I just, people that have been watching, there's been a lot of discussion about NVMe for a number of years, and NVMe over fabric more recently. How big a deal is this for the industry? You've seen many of these waves. Is this transformational or is it, you know, every storage company I talk to is working on this, so how's it going to be differentiated? What should users be looking to be able to, who do they partner with, how do they choose that solution, and when's it going to be ready? >> So first of all, I view it as an evolution, okay. If you take storage in general, arrays, you know we used to do punch cards. I'm old enough I remember using punch cards at the University of California. Then, it all went to tape. And if you look at old Schwarzenegger movies from the 80s, I love Schwarzenegger spy movies, what's there? IBM systems with big IBM tape, and not for back-up, for primary storage. Then in the late-80s, early-90s, IBM and a few other vendors came out with hard drive-based arrays that got hooked up to mainframes and then obviously into minis and to the rise of the LAN. Those have given away to all-flash arrays. From a connectivity perspective, you've had SCSI, you had ultra SCSI, you had ultra fast SCSI, ultra fast wide SCSI. Then you had fiber channel. So now as an infrastructure both in an array, as a connectivity between storage and the CPUs used in an array system, will be NVMe, and then you're going to have NVMe running over fabrics. So I view this as an evolution, right? >> John: What's the driver, performance or flexibility? >> A little bit of both. So from the in-box perspective, inside of an array solution, the major chip manufacturers are putting NVMe to increase the speed from storage going into the CPUs. So that will benefit the performance to the end-user for applications, workloads, and use cases. Then what they've done is Intel has pushed, with all the industry, IBM's a member of the NVMe consortium as well, has pushed using the NVMe protocol over fabrics, which also gives some added performance over fabric networks as well. So you've got it, but again I view this again as evolution, because punch cards, tape was faster, hard drive arrays were faster than tape, then flash arrays are faster, now you're going to have NVMe in the flash array, and also NVMe over fabric with connecting all-flash array. >> So I have to ask you the real question that's on everyone's mind that's out there, because storage is one of those areas that you never see it stopping. There's always venture back start-ups, you see new hot start-ups coming out of the woodwork, and there's been some failures lately and some blame NVMe's innovation to kind of killing some start-ups, I won't name names. But the real issue is the lines that were once blurred are now forming, and there's the wrong side of history and the right side of history. So I've got to ask you, what's going to be the right side of history in the storage architecture that people need to get onto to win in the future? >> So, there's a couple key points. One, all storage infrastructure and storage software needs to interface with cloud infrastructure. Got to be hybrid, if you have a software play like we do, where the software, such as our Spectrum Scale or our Spectrum Protect or Spectrum Protect Plus, can exist as a cloud service through a service rider, that's where you want to be. You don't want to have just a standard array and that's all you sell. So you want to have an array business, you want to make sure that's highly performant, you want to make sure that's the position, and the infrastructure underneath clouds, which means not only very fast, but also incredibly resilient. And that includes both cloud configs and AI. If you're going to do real-time AI, if you're going to do dark trading on Wall Street using AI instead of human beings, A, if the storage isn't really fast you're going to miss a 10 million dollar, hundred million dollar transaction. Second thing, if it's not resilient and always available, you're really in trouble. And god forbid when they bring AI to healthcare, and I mean AI in the operating room, boy if that storage fails when I'm on the table, wow. That's not going to be good. So those are the things you got to integrate with in the future. AI and cloud, whether it's software-defined in the array space, or if you're like IBM in both markets. >> John: Performance and resilient. >> Performance and resiliency is critical. >> All right, so Eric I have a non-storage question for you. >> Eric: Absolutely. >> So you've got the CMO hat for a division of IBM. You've been CMO of a start-up, you've been in this industry for a while. What's the changing role of the CMO in today's digital world? >> So I think the key thing is digital is a critical method of the overall marketing mix. And everything needs to reinforce everything. So let's take an example. One of the large storage websites and magazines recently announced that IBM is a finalist for four product-of-the-year awards. Two for all-flash arrays and two for software-defined storage. So guess what we've done? We've amplified it over LinkedIn, over IBM Facebook, through our Twitter handle, we leverage that. We use it at trade shows. So digital is A, the first foray, right? People look on your website and look at what you're doing socially before they even decide, should I really call them up, or should I really go to their booth a trade show? >> So discovery and learning is happening online. >> Discovery and learning, but even progression. We just, I just happened to tweet and LinkedIn this morning, Clarinet, a large European cloud MSP and CSP, just selected IBM all-flash arrays, IBM Spectrum Protect, and IBM Spectrum Virtualize for their cloud infrastructure. And obviously their target, they sell to end-users and companies, right? But the key thing is we tweeted it, we linked it in, we're going to use it here at the show, we're going to use it in PR efforts. So digital is a critical element of the marketing mix, it's not a fad. It also can be a lead dog. So if you're going to a trade show, you should tweet about it and link it in, just the way you guys do. We all knew you were coming to this show, we know you're going to IBM Think, we know you're going to VM World and Oracle, all these great shows. How do we find out? We follow you on social media and on the digital market space, so it's critical. >> And video, video a big role in - >> Video is critical. We use your videos all the time, obviously. I always tweet them and link them in once I'm posted. >> Clip and stick is the new buzzword. Clip 'em and stick 'em. Our new clipper tool, you've seen that. >> (laughs) Yes, I have. So it's really critical, though, that, you can, and remember, I'm like one of the oldest guys in the storage business, I'm 60 years old, I've been doing this 32 years, seven start-ups, EMC, IBM twice, Mac store Seagate, so I've done big and small. This is a sea change transformation in marketing. The key thing is you have to make it not stand on its own, integrate everything. PR, analyst relations, digital in everything you do, digital with shows and how you integrate the whole buyer's journey, and put it together. And people are using digital more and more, in fact I saw a survey from a biz school, 75% of people are looking at you digitally before they ever even call you up or call one of your resellers if you use the channel, to talk about your products. That's a sea change. >> You guys do a great job with content marketing, hats off to you guys. All right, final question for you, take a minute to just quickly explain the relationship that IBM has with Cisco and the importance of it, specifically what you guys are doing with them, how you guys go on to market to customers, and what's the impact to the customer. >> So, first of all, we have a very broad relationship with Cisco, Obviously I'm the CMO of the Storage Division, so I focus on storage, but several other divisions of IBM have powerful relationships. The IoT group, the Collaboration group. Cisco's one of our valued partners. We don't have networking products, so our Global Technology Services Division is one of the largest resellers of Cisco in the world, whether it be networking, servers, converge, what-have-you, so it's a strong, powerful relationship. From an end-user perspective, the importance is they know that the two companies are working together hand-in-glove. Sometimes you have two companies where you buy solutions from the A and B, and A and B don't even talk to each other, and yes they both go to the PlugFest or the Compatibility Lab, but they don't really work together, and their technology doesn't work together. IBM and Cisco have gone well beyond that to make sure that we work closely together in all of the divisions, including the storage division, with our Cisco-validated designs. And then lastly, whether it's delivered through the direct sales model or through the valued business partners that IBM and Cisco share, it's critical the end-user know, and the partners know, they're getting something that works together and doesn't just have the works option. It's tightly-honed and finely-integrated, whether it be storage or the IoT Division, the Collaboration Division, Cisco is a heavy proponent of IBM Security Division. >> Product teams work together? >> Yeah, all the product teams work together, trade APIs back and forth, not just doing the, and let's go do a test, compatibility test. Which everybody does that, but we go well beyond that with IBM and Cisco together. >> And it's a key relationship for you guys? >> Key relationship for the Storage Division, as well as for many of the other divisions of IBM, it's a critical relationship with Cisco. >> All right, Eric Herzog, Chief Marketing Officer for the Storage Systems group at IBM. It's theCUBE live coverage in Barcelona, I'm John Furrier, Stu Miniman, back with more from Barcelona Cisco Live Europe after this short break. (upbeat techno music)

Published Date : Jan 30 2018

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Cisco, Veeam, I'm John Furrier, the co-host of theCUBE, and all the things you do for us, You're in the middle of it. for the VersaStack are MSPs and CSPs, What's the most important thing for the cloud building, if you will. The buzz in the market, there's a lot of discussion, And one of the negatives of hyper-converged, Any impact on the network that we should be but it's actually on the arrays as well. Is this transformational or is it, you know, and the CPUs used in an array system, will be NVMe, So from the in-box perspective, and the right side of history. and the infrastructure underneath clouds, What's the changing role of the CMO So digital is A, the first foray, right? just the way you guys do. We use your videos all the time, obviously. Clip and stick is the new buzzword. and remember, I'm like one of the oldest guys and the importance of it, and doesn't just have the works option. Yeah, all the product teams work together, Key relationship for the Storage Division, for the Storage Systems group at IBM.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

CiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

EricPERSON

0.99+

Eric HerzogPERSON

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

TwoQUANTITY

0.99+

StuPERSON

0.99+

two companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

BarcelonaLOCATION

0.99+

NutanixORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

DecemberDATE

0.99+

220 terabytesQUANTITY

0.99+

CUBEORGANIZATION

0.99+

VeeamORGANIZATION

0.99+

New YorkLOCATION

0.99+

32 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

10 million dollarQUANTITY

0.99+

Global Technology Services DivisionORGANIZATION

0.99+

LinkedInORGANIZATION

0.99+

ClarinetORGANIZATION

0.99+

SchwarzeneggerPERSON

0.99+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.99+

Barcelona, SpainLOCATION

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

20th of FebruaryDATE

0.99+

VM WorldORGANIZATION

0.99+

EMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBM Storage SystemsORGANIZATION

0.99+

SeagateORGANIZATION

0.98+

two rackQUANTITY

0.98+

oneQUANTITY

0.98+

KubeCon Wrap | KubeCon 2017


 

live from Austin Texas it's the cube covering cube con and cloud native con 2017 brought to you by Red Hat the Lenox foundation and the cubes ecosystem partners hey welcome back everyone we are live here in Austin Texas for this the cube exclusive coverage of the cloud native con and cube con kubernetes con north america 2017 I'm John Fourier wrapping up the show of two days of live coverage it was dude Minutemen and Justin Warren analysts with the cube guys you guys are out in the hallways Justin you read all the sessions still we've been doing interviews great shows second year full year was a standalone show it was kind of you know a small show last year but really amazing size seven forty five hundred people or so a lot of logos diamond sponsors platinum sponsors gold sponsors silver sponsors startup sponsors media partners it's a freaking commercial party yet tons of developers tons of action so it's not so much a vendor show a lot of vendor interest in what is the a-list developers in this new way to program new way to build services from lyft donating massive to envoy code Google bringing in massive code a lot of contributions a lot of energy a lot of tech action let's wrap it up do yeah so John first of all you I I we had covered the show last year you had gone done it I seen the buzz around kubernetes so I had a certain expectation and actually it's a the show exceeded my expectation you know Dan conan told us we're gonna have over 4,000 people so that it wasn't the size of it but just the quality of the people and the interactions here you know we've been in other shows you know over the years with the cube where you've had you know those builders and you know smart people but wow you know you walk around here people that have done some of these things many time and as we were talking with a number of them it's you know there's some of this infrastructure and really trying to you know solve some of these things and make infrastructure boring that now we've been beating on for years as well as you know it's really helping the applications and I like it this really kind of bridges you know those environments because infrastructure has always known the reason we have infrastructure is to help the applications and for too long infrastructure has been this boat anchor and you know smart people who've been through you know lots of battles before and it feels a little different it feels like we were making some progress you know just and I were talking ahead of the show I remember when we wrapped up Amazon last week it's like serverless holds a lot of promise well server list does not eclipse all of the cloud native and kubernetes stuff here we're actually seeing some of the intersection I know I want to hear Justin's take on some of it but you know a lot of good things you know just in 20 or 50 sessions here they're all online by the way on their YouTube channel for the CN CF you had a chance to kind of walk with always go to some sessions what did you find most exciting what was the notable point the comment sessions here have been spectacular I agree with you the quality of the attendees from from from customers from people who are building the things from vendors it's it's really really high quality stuff the sessions are really technical it depends on which part of the ecosystem you want to dive into so there's not as much in entry level and high level stuff so people who were involved in this ecosystem know what they're doing so it'll be interesting to see how that changes over the next couple of years I expect that there's going to be a bit more intro level thing although boring is the new exciting so maybe there will be no need to do a lot of the intro stuff because it'll be abstracted away so there's a lot of projects that are about basically about making everything easy that is the goal that's what I'm hearing around the conference today and there's lots of there we saw in the keynote yesterday the idea of meta particle which is basically layering extra layers of abstraction on top of kubernetes we saw it again in the keynote with Chen today where they're trying to put different services on top of kubernetes so essentially kubernetes goes away and just becomes invisible it's like plumbing Clayton Coleman mentioned that from Red Hat making containers boring I agree boring is the new black that means boring is working that's foundational to me I think I'm excited by the fact that we're it's not a lot of land grabbing so to speak on it by the vendors it's very foundational tech and people are focused on don't screw it up let's we got a good thing going on it was goober Nettie's that's kind of the vibe I'm sensing and then the excitement of opportunity yeah there seems to be a lot of that anything jump out at you Justin on in terms of tech hallway conversations notable emerging projects that's your eye as catching up with you just before the show we we were talking about what are you looking forward to and for me two of the big things was service and storage like state management and I agree with you those are the two things that still aren't really solve I just came from the server that's working group just before coming on here and there are still a whole bunch of foundational questions about what service actually is is it function to the service is it more than that does s3 count as as something which is service because you don't actually care about which server you're hitting maybe that's service so there's still a lot of work to be done there about defining what that looks like and creating some standards around things standards is apparently a dirty word which I thought it was a bit strange that this whole idea of what standards a great isn't it it's great it's a standard which are which allows you to build other things on top of that I think we're going to see more and more of that that's what we've seen with kubernetes that's one of the the great benefits of having this standardized thing run by CN CF is everyone else can take that off the table as a as a competitive thing so we're not trying to outdo each other and be more kubernetes than anyone else instead people are building things on top of that so we're seeing storage providers like diamante we're seeing networking providers who are doing things with sto and we've works so that ecosystem is being deliberately created by taking some of that competitive pressure off the table okay that's a great point I want to bring that stool and get your thoughts because we interviewed Ben seek single men from lights light stats and he's super smart guy great conversation where things I asked him about his innovation around communities and he says look it you got a is building communities and having them run things is not as good as being forced to come together around standards you mentioned Ethernet a lot of the OSI model was formulated because if you didn't standardize there was no outcome for anybody yeah so there's that kind of going on with kubernetes where just has come together let's it should be a good word and it was done deliberately I was again talking with Jen that like community is is a kind of a buzzword of the cook of the conference there are specific things that have been done to build a community here it's not just about technology it's about the people and we've got things like the diversity scholarships that we saw on on the first day we're 103 people were were sponsored to come here and be on this conference yeah you know I come into something like that a little bit skeptical when you want to poke at things you know coming off of the Amazon show it's there are many people that are scared of Amazon this show everybody's actually really happy and they're like great it's no longer Hadrian made it made a comment to us he's like it's not the everybody about Amazon Club they're here and everybody's actually happy they're here now you know some of the things they're doing will still kind of play out over time but community it's real John did the amount of smart men and women that we talk to I agree with you blew my mind I mean and who we just had on you know you mentioned you know some of the other guests we've had on just super high quality you know just density you brought up a good point this is something that we hadn't talked about this could bring it up Amazon yes last week we're talking about the Amazon how they're winning everything else everyone's reacting to Amazon and this show is reacting to Amazon in a positive way because the culture here they're from the same tech religion if you want to call it a religion they're cloud native they buy the Amazon value proposition yeah so it's not like this is an anti-feminist on crowd if anything they're all going hey Thank You Amazon keep validating micro services I mean why would you it is very much a yes and it's like cloud great what else can we do let's do more of that let's let's layer things on top of this cloud thing and let's in fact go multiplayer let's put with cloud all the things yeah and the competition strategy is gonna be interesting by the families and what's what's great is that they're enabling stuff so to me we're gonna see where the value will be created obviously the software engineering piece it's going to be a big definition I think so the word software engineering now means something you look at all the tech here it's software engineering then the application developers our application developers they're not engineering plumping right so I mean so you're gonna start to see you know that kind of roll so this new ecosystem might emerge you guys reaction to that I mean John look kubernetes commoditized it's no longer you know there's not the orchestration Wars we talked about this coming in it was one of the things that surprised me is this Kelsey said on his keynote this one actually wasn't any really big surprises this community has a lot of transparency so if you're plugged in if you're talking to the people we understand the roadmap there's a lot of projects and nobody can keep up with all the changes but some of the base pieces we understand where that is the the service mesh piece you know huge participation people go into the sessions everybody's interest learning to it and there's so many pieces where people who contribute customers are getting value and it's still very very early days I I love the line they said it's like hey 4100 people here that's probably everyone running kubernetes right now with around the world so you know John I how BIG's this gonna get you know what do we say and I'd love to get just let's take us he was more in the hallways but just to kind of smell on the vibe here and kind of feeling it and read the tea leaves and if things if they smell brisk if the CNC F doesn't screw it up which I don't think they will cuz Dan's very confident they got a great team I do agree with Justin this is a community that was designed by the people first that have the right principles and and know what they want and then will allow detect the form so I think we might see an easier decision around standards if that all happens things like standards and whatnot to make it grow I think this could be a little mini reinvent going on here so I feel a lot like reinvents do our first time there where you know we got all the best guests because such a small community now it's so popular we got it they're all booked up and we're trying to grab guests I think this could be as big as reinvent in not as now but eventually this could be an industry event because if this all works out you're going to see two major audiences those software engineering plumbers and then on the application side that's going to be the business logic like they've been talking about and then that's going to create value ecosystem a third new constituency if that happens it's a services world and it's a you know twenty thousand person show yeah I can definitely see this growing into a big big show we don't have many industry independent shows anymore most of them are a particular vendors ecosystem this one is yeah that's like kubernetes came from Google but it's the CNC F is an independent body they're being very careful about which projects that they add in I was speaking with a lot of the members and of the of the founding board and they are being very careful to not make the same mistakes that's happened with OpenStack they've learned a lot of the lessons from OpenStack and and other communities as well so they're making some deliberate decisions based on experience and knowledge that they've gained from other places so that this will be sustainable and that it can grow into something really really big and I'll just add to your point there Dan Cohen said on the opening keynote they specifically designed it to be a technical event yes not a business event yes Stu that takes a question cube con with a-c-c ube could be the business of kubernetes get out there confuse your prediction for 2018 we're bringing our best coverage guys thanks for commentary last word thoughts this show sum it up wrap it up cube all the things yeah I mean just impressive John after you know this is our last big event of the year you know just so you know humbled to be able to be you know in this community meet some amazing people and you know share it with our audience you know that this community is something that comes out of this we do community with the K I guess for kubernetes yeah I think high quality okay purposeful high integrity and smart and I think that is formula that will play well love the diversity love all the action guys great great wrap-up Justin's do is the cube here wrapping up coop con cloud native con North America 2017 in Austin Texas thanks for watching of course visit Silk'n angle calm and youtube.com which I still contain go the cube net and we keep on comm and special shout out to Red Hat for all the great support appreciate it and continued success to Red Hat the cubes signing off from Austin Texas thanks for watching

Published Date : Dec 7 2017

SUMMARY :

and the interactions here you know we've

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dan CohenPERSON

0.99+

20QUANTITY

0.99+

John FourierPERSON

0.99+

ChenPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

2018DATE

0.99+

HadrianPERSON

0.99+

OpenStackORGANIZATION

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dan conanPERSON

0.99+

KelseyPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

JustinPERSON

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

Clayton ColemanPERSON

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

JenPERSON

0.99+

103 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

DanPERSON

0.99+

two daysQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

4100 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

Justin WarrenPERSON

0.98+

Austin TexasLOCATION

0.98+

Austin TexasLOCATION

0.98+

KubeConEVENT

0.98+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.98+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.98+

second yearQUANTITY

0.97+

50 sessionsQUANTITY

0.97+

CN CFORGANIZATION

0.96+

over 4,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.96+

twenty thousand personQUANTITY

0.94+

NettiePERSON

0.94+

Amazon ClubORGANIZATION

0.94+

youtube.comORGANIZATION

0.93+

forty five hundred peopleQUANTITY

0.93+

LenoxORGANIZATION

0.93+

two major audiencesQUANTITY

0.92+

oneQUANTITY

0.92+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.92+

first dayQUANTITY

0.91+

KubeCon 2017EVENT

0.9+

firstQUANTITY

0.9+

a lot of projectsQUANTITY

0.87+

next couple of yearsDATE

0.87+

a lot of the lessonsQUANTITY

0.86+

a lot of projectsQUANTITY

0.86+

lyftORGANIZATION

0.85+

2017DATE

0.83+

third new constituencyQUANTITY

0.83+

diamanteORGANIZATION

0.8+

tons of developersQUANTITY

0.8+

a lot of the membersQUANTITY

0.8+

CNCORGANIZATION

0.79+

one ofQUANTITY

0.77+

Ben seekPERSON

0.76+

lotQUANTITY

0.75+

single menQUANTITY

0.72+

MinutemenORGANIZATION

0.7+

many piecesQUANTITY

0.69+

RedORGANIZATION

0.69+

a lotQUANTITY

0.67+

yearsQUANTITY

0.65+

northLOCATION

0.63+

sevenQUANTITY

0.63+

thingsQUANTITY

0.63+

Red HatORGANIZATION

0.62+

cloud native conEVENT

0.54+

Silk'n angle calmORGANIZATION

0.5+

Domenic Venuto, The Weather Company | Samsung Developer Conference 2017


 

>> Voiceover: Live from San Francisco, it's The Cube. Covering Samsung Developer Conference 2017. Brought to you by Samsung. >> Okay, welcome back, everyone. Live here in San Francisco, this is The Cube's exclusive coverage of Samsung Developer Conference, SDC 2017. I'm John Furrier, co-founder of SiliconANGLE Media, and co-host of The Cube. My next guest is Dominic Venuto, who is the General Manager of the consumer division of The Weather Channel, and Watson Advertising, which is part of The Weather Company. Welcome to The Cube. >> Thank you for having me. >> Finally, I got the consumer guy on. I've interviewed The Weather Company folks from the IBM side, two different brands. One's the data, big data science operation going on, the whole Weather Company. But Weather Channel, the consumer stuff, Weather Underground, that's your product. >> Yes, you saved the best for last. We touch the consumer. >> So, weather content is good. So obviously, the hurricanes have been in the news over the years. Out here in California, the fires. People are interested in whether the impact, it used to be a unique thing on cable, go to the Weather Channel, check the forecast, read the paper. Now with online apps, weather is constantly a utility for users. So it's not a long-tail editorial product. It's pretty fundamental. >> Yeah, we want to be where our consumers are. Fundamentally we want to help people make better decisions and propel the world. And since weather touches everything, we need to be where the consumers are. So now, with all the digital touchpoints, whether that's your phone, or its a watch, your television, desktop if you still have one and you're still using it, as some of us do. We want to be there, for that very reason. And in fact, what we're aiming for, is to move from a utility, because if we are going to help people make better decisions, a utility only goes so far, would be a platform to anticipate behavior and drive decisions. >> So tell me about the Weather Underground and the weather.com consumer product. They're all one in the same now? Obviously one was very successful, with user generated content. This is not going away. Explain the product side of The Weather Channel consumer division. >> Yeah, so we have two brands in our portfolio, Weather Underground, which is more of a challenger brand. It's very data rich, and visualizes data in a number of different ways, that a certain user group really loves. So if you're a weather geek, as we call them, an avid aficionado of weather, and you really want to really get in there and understand what's happening, and look at the data, then Weather Underground is a platform. >> So for users to tie into, to put up weather stations, and other things that might be relevant. >> Exactly so, we started out in 2001, originally the first IOT implementation at the consumer level, connected devices. Where you could connect a personal weather station, put one in your back yard, and connect it to our platform, and feed hyper-local data into our network. And then we feed that into our forecast, to improve that, and actually validate whether the forecast is right or not, based on what people have at home. And we've hit a recent milestone. We've got over 250,000 personal weather stations connected to the network, which we are super thrilled about. And now, what we are doing is, we are extending that network to other connected devices, and air quality is a big topic right now, in other parts of the world, especially in Asia, where air quality is not always where it should be, that's a big thing we think we can... >> That's a big innovation opportunity for you, I mean, you point out the underground product was part of maker-culture, people do-it-yourself weather stations, evolve now into really strong products. That same dynamic could be used for air control, not just micro-climates. >> Exactly, yeah. >> In California, we had a problem this week. >> Exactly, California is a good example, really topical, where cities may have had great air quality, and all of the sudden the environment changes, and you want to know, what is it like? What is the breathing quality like outside right now? And you can come to our network and see that. And we're growing the air quality sensors every month, it's only been up a few months right now, so that's expanding quite well. >> So for the folks that don't know, The Weather Channel back end, has a huge data-driven product. I don't want to get into that piece, because we've talked about it. Go to youtube.com/siliconangle, search Weather Company. You'll see all our great videos from the IBM events, that are out, if you want the detail. But I do want to ask you, what's really happening with you guys, there's two things. One is, it's an app and content for devices, like Samsung is using. And two, essentially you're an IOT network. Sensors are sensors, whether they're user-generated, or user-populated, you guys are deploying a serious IOT capability. >> Absolutely, it's one of the reasons that IBM acquired The Weather Company, which houses the brands of Weather Underground and The Weather Channel, is that we have this fantastic infrastructure, this IOT infrastructure, ingesting large amounts of data, processing it, and then serving it back out to consumers at scale globally. >> What are you guys doing there with Samsung? Anything just particular in the IOT side, or? >> We've got a couple of initiatives going on with Samsung, a few I can't mention right now, but stay tuned. Some really cool things in the connect-at-home, that we're excited about, that builds on some of the work... >> Nest competitor? >> Not exactly a Nest competitor. Think more kitchen. >> Kitchen, okay. >> Think more kitchen. >> We had the goods, cooking in the kitchen, from our previous guest. So the question is, IOT personal, I get that. What else is going on with IOT, with you guys, that you can share? Lifestyle, in the home is great, but... >> So again, going back to how do we help people make better decisions, now that we are collecting data from not just personal weather stations, but air quality monitors, we are collecting it from cars, we are collecting it from the cell phone. We are really able to ingest data at scale, and when you're doing that, we've got hundreds of thousands of data sets that we are feeding into our models, when you do that, we've solved the computing challenge, now we are applying machine-learning and artificial intelligence to process this and extract insights. To validate data sets, in our forecast, and then deliver that back to the end user. >> One of the tech geek themes we talk about all of the time is policy-based something. Programming, setting the policy. So, connecting the dots from what you're saying is, I'm driving my car, and I want to know if it's hot, or the road temperature. I might want to know if I'm running too fast, and my sensor device on me wants to impact the weather, for comfortable breathing for me, for instance. The lifestyle impacts, the content of data, is not just watching a video on The Weather Channel. >> No, it's not. >> So this is a new user experience. It's immersive, it's lifestyle-oriented, it's relevant. What are some of the products you're doing with Samsung, that can enable this new user expectation? >> One of the products that we have right now, we we're one of the initial partners for the Made for Samsung program, is, we've got calendar integration in our app. So now we know, if you've got a meeting coming up, and you need to travel to get there, maybe there's a car trip involved, we know, obviously, the forecast. We know what traffic might be, and we can give you heads up, an alert, that says, hey you might want to leave 15 minutes early for that meeting coming up. That's in the Samsung product right now, which is really, again, helping people make better decisions. So we've got a lot of examples like that. But again, the calendar integration in the Made for Samsung app is really exciting. We recently announced, in fact I think it was this morning, we announced integration with Trip Advisor. So similarly, if we see time on your calendar, and the weather is fine for the weekend, we might suggest outdoor activities for you to go and explore, using Trip Advisor's almost one-billion library of events that they have. >> What's the coolest thing you guys are working on right now? >> Oh, that's a very long list. I say that I'm probably the luckiest guy in IBM right now, because I get to work with millions of consumers, we reach 250 million consumers a month, and I'm also bringing Watson to consumers, and artificial intelligence, which is a unique challenge to solve. Introducing consumers to a new paradigm of user interaction and abilities. So, I think the most exciting thing is taking artificial intelligence and machine-learning, and bringing that to consumers at scale, and solving some of the challenges there. >> Well contratulations. I'm a big fan of IBM, what they're doing with weather data, The Weather Company, The Weather Channel. Bringing that data and immersing it into these new networks that are being created, new capabilities, really helps the consumer, so. Hope to see you at the Think conference coming up next year. >> Yes, we are excited about that, and stay tuned, we may have some more exciting stuff to unveil. >> Make sure our writers get ahold of it, break the stories. It's The Cube, bringing you the data. The weather's fine in San Francisco today. I'm John Farrier with The Cube. More live from San Francisco, from the SDC Samsung Developer Conference, after this short break. (electronic music)

Published Date : Oct 19 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Samsung. and co-host of The Cube. Finally, I got the consumer guy on. Yes, you saved the best for last. So obviously, the hurricanes have been in the news and propel the world. and the weather.com consumer product. and you really want to really get in there So for users to tie into, to put up weather stations, in other parts of the world, I mean, you point out the underground product and all of the sudden the environment changes, So for the folks that don't know, Absolutely, it's one of the reasons that IBM that we're excited about, that builds on some of the work... Think more kitchen. So the question is, IOT personal, I get that. of data sets that we are feeding into our models, One of the tech geek themes we talk about all of the time What are some of the products you're doing with Samsung, One of the products that we have right now, and solving some of the challenges there. really helps the consumer, so. Yes, we are excited about that, and stay tuned, from the SDC Samsung Developer Conference,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
2001DATE

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

John FarrierPERSON

0.99+

SamsungORGANIZATION

0.99+

Weather ChannelORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Dominic VenutoPERSON

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

AsiaLOCATION

0.99+

The Weather CompanyORGANIZATION

0.99+

The Weather ChannelORGANIZATION

0.99+

OneQUANTITY

0.99+

SiliconANGLE MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

Weather CompanyORGANIZATION

0.99+

Watson AdvertisingORGANIZATION

0.99+

Weather UndergroundORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

SDC Samsung Developer ConferenceEVENT

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

two brandsQUANTITY

0.98+

SDC 2017EVENT

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.98+

this weekDATE

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

Samsung Developer Conference 2017EVENT

0.98+

Samsung Developer ConferenceEVENT

0.97+

Domenic VenutoPERSON

0.96+

youtube.com/siliconangleOTHER

0.96+

this morningDATE

0.96+

over 250,000 personal weather stationsQUANTITY

0.95+

weather.comORGANIZATION

0.94+

15 minutesQUANTITY

0.93+

two different brandsQUANTITY

0.93+

The CubeORGANIZATION

0.92+

Trip AdvisorORGANIZATION

0.92+

hundreds of thousandsQUANTITY

0.9+

Think conferenceEVENT

0.89+

250 million consumers a monthQUANTITY

0.88+

WatsonTITLE

0.85+

almost one-billion libraryQUANTITY

0.82+

search Weather CompanyORGANIZATION

0.7+

Made forTITLE

0.7+

millions of consumersQUANTITY

0.68+

every monthQUANTITY

0.6+

monthsQUANTITY

0.59+

IOTORGANIZATION

0.59+

dataQUANTITY

0.54+

MadeTITLE

0.49+

The CubeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.33+

Redg Snodgrass, ReadWrite & ReadWrite Labs | Samsung Developer Conference 2017


 

>> Narrator: Live from San Francisco, it's the CUBE. Covering Samsung Developer Conference 2017, brought to you by Samsung. >> Okay, welcome back everyone. We are here live with the CUBE coverage where Cloud Native and the SmartThings Conference from Samsung Developer Conference. I'm John Furrier, the founder, the co-founder of SiliconANGLE Media. Co-host of the cube here with Redg Snodgrass, who's the chairman of ReadWrite and ReadWrite Labs. >> Hello everybody. >> Also been an entrepreneur, he's done the Wearable World events, done a lot of things in tech, riding the waves. You seen them, a lot of action going on, Redg. Want to get your the thoughts as we wrap up day one of two days of wall-to-wall coverage of the cubes, Samsung Developer Conference, a lot going on. You know Samsung, they're trying to play their best hand that possible. Obviously, they're not going to come out and say, We're not really ready for primetime, for the cloud. But the reality is, they're not ready for primetime for the cloud and IoT. However, huge strides in positioning, messaging, and the self awareness of their stove pipes. They are series of stove pipes that they've recognized, We've got to make this a 2.0 Bixby that crosses across all of Samsung, open up IoT. >> Redg: Which I thought was great. >> Open ecosystem, everything else, to me, is a work in progress, kind of, cover the, hide the ball, a little bit, I mean, what's your thoughts? Do you agree or what's your reaction? >> Oh man, I was on a panel earlier today. And somebody was like, oh, this is great. And I wanted to go back to, back when we did the open API service with Alcatel-Lucent, when we roll out all this stuff for the telcos. I mean, it's just, it's a lot of hype, initially. But what I do like about it is it seems like there's a dogged commitment to creating all the different documentations necessary and bringing that in, I mean, if they really put the full marketing weight behind it, this could get really interesting really fast. I mean, they own almost every device in your home already. >> Well, I said the word hide-the-ball. Maybe I should take a step back and not be too harsh. What I mean by that is, they're not hiding the ball on purpose, I think they're, by design, and I think Greg mentioned this earlier. Greg Narain said, they're doing it by design. And I think that that's a good call. SmarterThings is a good positioning because it highlights multiple devices and connecting it together. I think if they played the data card and the cloud too much, they would've overplayed their hand, and it's not needed. I mean, do you think it's needed? I mean, I don't think it's needed. >> Well, one of the biggest problems with IoT right now is that you have multiple different silos creating data. And then all those data silos have to figure out how to come together and talk about it. I mean, it seems like they're taking a step out, and saying, hey, we want to build that solution. Which is great, I'm more interested in the orchestration between different OSs, like, how are they really going to do that? Because it, we talked a lot about, when you build one of these ecosystems, you're really just building an economy. And the more open that you let your economy, right, the more business models come in, the more people that can be there. And so, if we were to start thinking about these OSs as real economies, like what do you need to have economy work? >> Well, I think this is why, we were talking earlier, I think that you had a good point. I think that validates what I'm thinking out loud here, which is, why play the data card. They don't need to because it's still open-book. They still got to figure it out, and that's not a bad thing. They play with their best hand, which is the consumer hand. >> Redg: It's consumerism is where they're at >> The devices are awesome, the screen on the phones are phenomenal, they got TVs. They got a little bit of a family hub going on with the living room, kitchen thing, with the refrigerators. That's IoT, they got healthcare because it's a device issue. So they're working their way from the consumer edge into the industrial edge. Now, if you're in the IT world, you have security problems. So most people that we talk to, at the humans, they say, hey John, my plate is full, I got to staff up my DevOps and my application developers. I got to unbolt security from my IT department, make that report to the board as a profit center now. And I got all this machine learning and Cloud Ops, and you want me to do what? Like, instrument my entire factory with this IoT thing? So people are holding the brakes. >> Well, I mean think about it. Every day, right, you're confronted with another executive that has like fallen on a sword of a major security hack, a major security issue. And so, as an executive of a major like business unit, with a technology group in front of you, you're sitting there making all these decisions every day. And it used to, you used to come and say, okay, we're going to make decisions every eight, nine months. And you have this big waterfall thing in front of you. And you know that, from your vendors, that. >> John: It's predictable >> Everything was predictable, and now it's like, oh man, I got to get into this Google Glass stuff, and I've got, no, now it's wearables, and wearables, that doesn't work, I need my IoT infrastructure stuff. And so we're moving the court, you know, away from all these CIO, CTOs consistently of what they need to think about next. >> It's interesting, if you look at the stack, go back to the old 80s OSI model, you got the lower level stack, middleware, and then application stacks. If you follow the data, and the networks, and the packets, how it moves, you can almost see the trends, batch versus real time. And I think what we've seen in the big data world, in data sciences, which can be analytics, obviously specialty industry. But the role of data and realtime, self-driving cars, really highlights this really huge wave coming, which is how that people dealt with data and software, the relationship between software and data was different. You store it in a database, build the database, call the database, get the data out, load it in, slow, monolithic, siloed. But now you have data that you need in really low latency at any given time, in any different app, from any different database, in less than a millisecond how do you do that. >> Well, think of it. >> John: That takes intelligence. >> About two years ago, I had a great conversation with a big packet moving company that managed most of the packet movement for most of the internet. And we were talking about, what does it look like per person in the US in the next like three or four years? And it could be up to a petabyte a day at a per person. Now that sounds awesome because if you look at all the different like videos we watch, it's like, oh, that's great, really cool flying car. You know, connecting windows, no one's really doing the math on that. And if it's a petabyte per day per person, like in the US a year even, or you know. I could see models where it could be a month. Think about what that does to the network load. We just don't have the math to be able, you know, possibility to handle that. >> This is why the decentralization with Blockchain is interesting. Even though Blockchain is hyped up, I think it's fundamental to the internet, as this Dr. Wong from Alibaba, who told me that last week. He said it was like a TCP/IP, I agree with him because you have distributed computers, which we know about. We've been there, done that, but now you got decentralized and distributed, two different concepts at the same time. That's a fundamental paradigm shift. >> Well, I mean it's just, so, I mean, you got to. >> It's intoxicating to think about what that disrupts. >> No, no, I love it, I mean, honestly, I've fallen in love with narrow band networks the last week. For some reason, I'm the weirdest person on the planet. Because it's such a solution for security. It's such a solution for a lot of this back calling and data that we're going to have. It'll be interesting to look at, but when you think about the pure math on this. >> John: Are you back calling data or are you back calling compute? >> Oh, well it's so. >> That's a different conversation. The trend is, don't move the data. Throw the compute at it because compute is, this is an architectural renaissance happening, people are re-imagining. >> How many, how many startup. >> In global infrastructure. >> Execs can even like draw architecture? Right, with all the lame startups, I mean, when was the last time you saw like somebody pitch. When they came to pitch, it's like, let me talk about my architecture. >> John: That should be the first slide. >> It should be the slide that you talk about as an executive and everything, I don't see. >> If he can't get on the whiteboard. >> Startups deliver architecture. >> If you can't get on the whiteboard and lay out an architecture on fundamentally the core engine of your technology, you shouldn't get funded. >> Well, so that is a major issue that's happening right now because I do think that we have this group think where we've disallowed a lot of R&D thinking. We don't do longterm R&D before we get a product to market. And now, like all. >> John: Sometimes you can't. Sometimes you have to sprint out and put a stake in the ground and iterate. >> Think about all of the connected device product. How do you test the connected device product to scale? Right, I mean the iPhone, you know Samsung, everybody has all these devices out there, they're getting this data, it's coming in they can actually iterate on that product and make decisions, right? >> Well, that brings up a good point. We saw this at the Cube at VMWorld. For the first time we heard people grumbling in the hallways like, you know, I love the ENC tries, but they just haven't tested this use case. And the use case was a new workload that had unique characteristics. In this case they needed low latency. It was an edge device, so it was mandatory to have no latency with all this was trickling data in. But in this case, they had set up their virtual SAN in a tiered basis. And they needed a certain hardware configuration with vSAN. And they've never tested the hardware stack with the software stack. So it's just one of those things that the hardware vendor just never imagined, you can't QA the unknown. So this is where I'd see Samsung doing things like in-chip and seeing what Intel's doing with some of their FPGA stuff. You can see that these infrastructure guys got to bring that DevOps concept to the consumer world. >> Redg: Oh, it's going to be so hard. >> Which is programming the. >> Redg: So hard. >> The hardware at will. >> Yeah, well. >> John: Like the cloud DevOps ethos. What do you think of that? >> Yeah, no, no, no, look, I mean, I'm such a big fan of being able to get your product in people's hands, to be able to see the use cases, develop them out and push that forward. You know, big corporations can do that. You have 10 iterations of almost every iPhone right now, with thousands of engineers iterating on it. So when you look at like the competitor, which is your device right now, versus every other piece of IoT technology that isn't been perfected or anything. Our biggest issue is we're driven by the success of the smartphone for every other piece of technology today. And that's, that makes it hard to drive adoption for any other devices. >> So I get your thoughts on this, 'cause we wrap up day one. Obviously, let's talk about the developers that they're targeting, okay. >> Okay. >> The Samsung developers that they're targeting is the same kind of developers that Apple's targeting. Let's just call it out, however, you see voice-activated touch, you're seeing the services tools, now they're bringing in an IoT. You're not hearing Apple talk about IoT. This is unique, you got Google onstage, wink, wink, hey, everybody we're here, we're Google, Android, coming together. What is in the mind of the developer in the Samsung ecosystem right now, what's your take on it, what's the psychology of that developer? >> I built an app at one point in time. It was dating app a long time ago, right, with some other guys, they built it, I was just the mouth. It's called Scout and we were on the Simian platform, and the iPhone, and we were on web, we were on mobile web. And in the iPhone app store, all with one engineer. And it was really hard because we had real-time chat. It was just so much crazy things. At the end of the day, what always matters is, again, you're building economies, you're not building fun playgrounds or anything else like that. And if your economy is, your platform is the easiest to use, it has the capabilities and advantages that are the norm, right, you'll win. Bass Diffusion is great it's this guy out here, he won a Nobel prize, but what Bass Diffusion says, in order for you to win in a market, you need two things, imitation and innovation. Imitation, for instance, in TVs, is your TV black and white, is it color. As things move up, innovation eventually overtakes, and always becomes innovation. So when you look at like what's needed in market, the platform that is the easiest to use, the platform that has the most capable imitative qualities, it's just very easy for you to push things to market universally from OS to OS, along with certain pieces of innovation around business models, certain API capabilities that may make it easier for them to deliver revenues. If those are the things that are delivered, that we see pushed out, a good blend of imitation and innovation, the win. It's that person that actually can deliver it. >> Well, we're seeing gaming in entertainment really driving change, Netflix earnings just came out. They blew it away again, you're seeing the cord cutters are clearly there. >> So much for Disney, right? >> E-commerce, yeah, I mean, Amazon's still got to make some moves too, even though they were still winning. No one's really falling out of the chair for Prime. I mean, no, I don't know a lot of people who rigorously turn on Prime, they shop on Prime, but not necessarily watching any entertainment. So I'm a little critical of Amazon on that. But, then again, but Amazon's doing the right thing. Netflix, Amazon, YouTube, you're seeing a culture of digital entertainment shifting. E-commerce is shifting, and now you got web services. I think Amazon encapsulates, in my mind, a great strategy, retail and services, but if you extend that out to the rest of the world, voice-activated apps, you can blend in commerce entertainment, you can replicate Amazon. I mean, they could replicate everything out there in the open. >> Amazon is so good at understanding where they fit in the stack and then, pushing the edge case further and further and further along. They're really brilliant, versus like VMware that's like, oh man, we can make apps, no problem. They went to make apps, and it didn't work out so well, they're great with VMs, so. >> John: They're great with operators in the enterprise, not so much with DevOps. >> No, no, no, no, and it's. >> They got pivotal for that now. Michael Dell bought everyone up. >> Yeah, exactly. It's understanding where you fit in the stack and being able to take advantage of it strategically. I mean, like I said, I think Samsung's positioned really well, I mean, I wouldn't have come and hung out with everybody if I was like, ah, I'm going to be bored all day. There's a lot of really exciting things. >> We got a lot of eye candy, no doubt about it. I love their TVs, love their screens. The new Samsung phone, is spectacular, you what I mean. >> I'm pretty ecstatic. >> It was the first phone that wanted me to get transferred off my iPhone. And I ended up getting the little junior Samsung here, but. >> Oh no, well it'll be interesting as they start to connect their platform together as all a lot of these other developers start pushing the pieces of their strategy together. Remember, it's like whenever you throw a strategy out here like this, it's like you have a big puzzle with a lot of empty pieces. >> I mean, the question I have for you is, let's just close out the segment. What do you think, what area should Samsung really be doubling down on or peddling faster, I should say. What should be developing faster? Is it the open APIs, is it the cloud? And they got to get the open ecosystem going, in my opinion. That's my take, what do you think they should be working on the most right now? >> Yeah, I mean like look, cloud is going to be really, really, there's a lot of competitors out in cloud. There's a lot of multiple, there's a lot of choices, right. Where I've seen them like really do well, I'll go back to the fact that I firmly believe that Google never really monetized the Android that Samsung did that a lot better. And so, by looking at the different points in the market, where they're good, I mean, their ecosystem is solid. I mean, yes, I mean it seems like the sexy thing is Apple, but I've talked to several developers, and I know where they make their money, and they do a strong amount of revenue, if not equivalent to where the iPhone is, at least from what I've heard so far. >> The android market share it's not shabby at all. >> Not, so. >> Damn good. >> So they've, they've been able to do this, like, from that, taken that Android stack, applying that imitation and innovation on top of it, fascinatingly so, I wouldn't count them out for this. And I'm pretty encouraged to see all the other aspects, but I like the ecosystem built out too. >> Redg Snodgrass, ReadWrite Labs, quick plug for you. What's going on in your world? Got some recent activities happening, please share update. >> So, yeah it's great, so we just launched our IOT revolution event series where we look at the atomic unit of different markets. And what that means is, we find the real buyers and sellers, a lot like what Debbie Lann, who I love, did. And we look at the buyers and sellers together, along with the top series A startups, all around newsworthy issues. And so, whatever it's like, is it hacking and Russia. You know, then we'll get cybersecurity experts up, and we'll talk about those issues from an executive point of view. And that's the thing that's making me most excited because I get to have all these conversations with people. It will be on video, onstage, November 13th, is the first one, it's a private event, but we'll work out anybody. >> Where's it going to be? >> It'll be in San Francisco, around 100 Broadway. So it's kind of a quiet thing, but I'd love for everybody to come if you're interested. >> It's a quiet thing but I want everyone to come. It was, not going there, too many people are going. >> It's like my parties, right? >> It's like a Yogi Berra. Well, thanks for coming out, appreciate, wrapping up day one of coverage The Cube. This is Samsung Developer Conference 2017. Hashtag SDC2017, that's what they're calling it. Lot of great guests today go to YouTube.com/siliconangle for all the great footage. And also check the Twitter sphere, lot of photos. And shout-out to Vanessa, out there has like helped us set everything up. Appreciate it and great to the team. That's day one wrap up, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)

Published Date : Oct 19 2017

SUMMARY :

2017, brought to you by Samsung. Co-host of the cube here with Redg Snodgrass, and the self awareness of their stove pipes. the open API service with Alcatel-Lucent, I mean, do you think it's needed? And the more open that you let your economy, right, I think that you had a good point. on the phones are phenomenal, they got TVs. And you know that, from your vendors, that. And so we're moving the court, you know, away from and the packets, how it moves, like in the US a year even, or you know. I think it's fundamental to the internet, For some reason, I'm the weirdest person on the planet. Throw the compute at it because I mean, when was the last time you saw like somebody pitch. It should be the slide that you talk about and lay out an architecture on fundamentally the core Well, so that is a major issue that's happening right now and put a stake in the ground and iterate. Right, I mean the iPhone, you know Samsung, And the use case was a new workload John: Like the cloud DevOps ethos. of the smartphone for every other piece of technology today. Obviously, let's talk about the What is in the mind of the developer And in the iPhone app store, all with one engineer. seeing the cord cutters are clearly there. No one's really falling out of the chair for Prime. in the stack and then, pushing the edge case in the enterprise, not so much with DevOps. They got pivotal for that now. It's understanding where you fit in the stack The new Samsung phone, is spectacular, you what I mean. And I ended up getting the little junior Samsung here, but. pushing the pieces of their strategy together. I mean, the question I have for you is, And so, by looking at the different points in the market, but I like the ecosystem built out too. What's going on in your world? And that's the thing that's making me most excited but I'd love for everybody to come if you're interested. It's a quiet thing but I want everyone to come. And also check the Twitter sphere, lot of photos.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Greg NarainPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

VanessaPERSON

0.99+

Debbie LannPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

SamsungORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

WongPERSON

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

GregPERSON

0.99+

AlibabaORGANIZATION

0.99+

DisneyORGANIZATION

0.99+

USLOCATION

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

November 13thDATE

0.99+

iPhoneCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

ReadWrite LabsORGANIZATION

0.99+

SiliconANGLE MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

two daysQUANTITY

0.99+

Redg SnodgrassPERSON

0.99+

AndroidTITLE

0.99+

PrimeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.99+

four yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

less than a millisecondQUANTITY

0.99+

10 iterationsQUANTITY

0.99+

thousandsQUANTITY

0.99+

first phoneQUANTITY

0.99+

first slideQUANTITY

0.98+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.98+

Samsung Developer ConferenceEVENT

0.98+

ENCORGANIZATION

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

Alcatel-LucentORGANIZATION

0.98+

Samsung Developer Conference 2017EVENT

0.98+

YouTube.com/siliconangleOTHER

0.98+

first oneQUANTITY

0.98+

ReadWriteORGANIZATION

0.97+

80sDATE

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

Samsung Developer Conference 2017EVENT

0.97+

first timeQUANTITY

0.97+

Nobel prizeTITLE

0.97+

RussiaLOCATION

0.97+

Redg SnodgrassORGANIZATION

0.96+

day oneQUANTITY

0.96+

a monthQUANTITY

0.96+

VMWorldORGANIZATION

0.96+

A startupsTITLE

0.95+

CubeORGANIZATION

0.94+

Day Two Kickoff | Big Data NYC


 

(quite music) >> I'll open that while he does that. >> Co-Host: Good, perfect. >> Man: All right, rock and roll. >> This is Robin Matlock, the CMO of VMware, and you're watching theCUBE. >> This is John Siegel of VPA Product Marketing at Dell EMC. You're watching theCUBE. >> This is Matthew Morgan, I'm the chief marketing officer at Druva and you are watching theCUBE. >> Announcer: Live from midtown Manhattan, it's theCUBE. Covering BigData New York City 2017. Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media and its ecosystem sponsors. (rippling music) >> Hello, everyone, welcome to a special CUBE live presentation here in New York City for theCUBE's coverage of BigData NYC. This is where all the action's happening in the big data world, machine learning, AI, the cloud, all kind of coming together. This is our fifth year doing BigData NYC. We've been covering the Hadoop ecosystem, Hadoop World, since 2010, it's our eighth year really at ground zero for the Hadoop, now the BigData, now the Data Market. We're doing this also in conjunction with Strata Data, which was Strata Hadoop. That's a separate event with O'Reilly Media, we are not part of that, we do our own event, our fifth year doing our own event, we bring in all the thought leaders. We bring all the influencers, meaning the entrepreneurs, the CEOs to get the real story about what's happening in the ecosystem. And of course, we do it with our analyst at Wikibon.com. I'm John Furrier with my cohost, Jim Kobielus, who's the chief analyst for our data piece. Lead analyst Jim, you know the data world's changed. We had commenting yesterday all up on YouTube.com/SiliconAngle. Day one was really set the table. And we kind of get the whiff of what's happening, we can kind of feel the trend, we got a finger on the pulse. Two things going on, two big notable stories is the world's continuing to expand around community and hybrid data and all these cool new data architectures, and the second kind of substory is the O'Reilly show has become basically a marketing. They're making millions of dollars over there. A lot of people were, last night, kind of not happy about that, and what's giving back to the community. So, again, the community theme is still resonating strong. You're starting to see that move into the corporate enterprise, which you're covering. What are you finding out, what did you hear last night, what are you hearing in the hallways? What is kind of the tea leaves that you're reading? What are some of the things you're seeing here? >> Well, all things hybrid. I mean, first of all it's building hybrid applications for hybrid cloud environments and there's various layers to that. So yesterday on theCUBE we had, for example, one layer is hybrid semantic virtualization labels are critically important for bridging workloads and microservices and data across public and private clouds. We had, from AtScale, we had Bruno Aziza and one of his customers discussing what they're doing. I'm hearing a fair amount of this venerable topic of semantic data virtualization become even more important now in the era of hybrid clouds. That's a fair amount of the scuttlebutt in the hallway and atrium talks that I participated in. Also yesterday from BMC we had Basil Faruqi talking about basically talking about automating data pipelines. There are data pipelines in hybrid environments. Very, very important for DevOps, productionizing these hybrid applications for these new multi-cloud environments. That's quite important. Hybrid data platforms of all sorts. Yesterday we had from ActIn Jeff Veis discussing their portfolio for on-prem, public cloud, putting the data in various places, and speeding up the queries and so forth. So hybrid data platforms are going increasingly streaming in real time. What I'm getting is that what I'm hearing is more and more of a layering of these hybrid environments is a critical concern for enterprises trying to put all this stuff together, and future-proof it so they can add on all the new stuff. That's coming along like cirrus clouds, without breaking interoperability, and without having to change code. Just plug and play in a massively multi-cloud environment. >> You know, and also I'm critical of a lot of things that are going on. 'Cause to your point, the reason why I'm kind of critical on the O'Reilly show and particularly the hype factor going on in some areas is two kinds of trends I'm seeing with respect to the owners of some of the companies. You have one camp that are kind of groping for solutions, and you'll see that with they're whitewashing new announcements, this is going on here. It's really kind of-- >> Jim: I think it's AI now, by the way. >> And they're AI-washing it, but you can, the tell sign is they're always kind of doing a magic trick of some type of new announcement, something's happening, you got to look underneath that, and say where is the deal for the customers? And you brought this up yesterday with Peter Burris, which is the business side of it is really the conversation now. It's not about the speeds and feeds and the cluster management, it's certainly important, and those solutions are maturing. That came up yesterday. The other thing that you brought up yesterday I thought was notable was the real emphasis on the data science side of it. And it's that it's still not easy or data science to do their job. And this is where you're seeing productivity conversations come up with data science. So, really the emphasis at the end of the day boils down to this. If you don't have any meat on the bone, you don't have a solution that rubber hits the road where you can come in and provide a tangible benefit to a company, an enterprise, then it's probably not going to work out. And we kind of had that tool conversation, you know, as people start to grow. And so as buyers out there, they got to look, and kind of squint through it saying where's the real deal? So that kind of brings up what's next? Who's winning, how do you as an analyst look at the playing field and say, that's good, that's got traction, that's winning, mm not too sure? What's your analysis, how do you tell the winners from the losers, and what's your take on this from the data science lens? >> Well, first of all you can tell the winners when they have an ample number of referenced customers who are doing interesting things. Interesting enough to get a jaded analyst to pay attention. Doing something that changes the fabric of work or life, whatever, clearly. Solution providers who can provide that are, they have all the hallmarks of a winner meaning they're making money, and they're likely to grow and so forth. But also the hallmarks of a winner are those, in many ways, who have a vision and catalyze an ecosystem around that vision of something that could be made, possibly be done before but not quite as efficiently. So you know, for example, now the way what we're seeing now in the whole AI space, deep learning, is, you know, AI means many things. The core right now, in terms of the buzzy stuff is deep learning for being able to process real time streams of video, images and so forth. And so, what we're seeing now is that the vendors who appear to be on the verge of being winners are those who use deep learning inside some new innovation that has enough, that appeals to a potential mass market. It's something you put on your, like an app or something you put on your smart phone, or it's something you buy at Walmart, install in your house. You know, the whole notion of clearly Alexa, and all that stuff. Anything that takes chatbot technology, really deep learning powers chatbots, and is able to drive a conversational UI into things that you wouldn't normally expect to talk to you and does it well in a way that people have to have that. Those are the vendors that I'm looking for, in terms of those are the ones that are going to make a ton of money selling to a mass market, and possibly, and very much once they go there, they're building out a revenue stream and a business model that they can conceivably take into other markets, especially business markets. You know, like Amazon, 20-something years ago when they got started in the consumer space as the exemplar of web retailing, who expected them 20 years later to be a powerhouse provider of business cloud services? You know, so we're looking for the Amazons of the world that can take something as silly as a conversational UI inside of a, driven by DL, inside of a consumer appliance and 20 years from now, maybe even sooner, become a business powerhouse. So that's what's new. >> Yeah, the thing that comes up that I want to get your thoughts on is that we've seen data integration become a continuing theme. The other thing about the community play here is you start to see customers align with syndicates or partnerships, and I think it's always been great to have customer traction, but, as you pointed out, as a benchmark. But now you're starting to see the partner equation, because this isn't open, decentralized, distributed internet these days. And it is looking like it's going to form differently than they way it was, than the web days and with mobile and connected devices it IoT and AI. A whole new infrastructure's developing, so you're starting to see people align with partnerships. So I think that's something that's signaling to me that the partnership is amping up. I think the people are partnering more. We've had Hortonworks on with IBM, people are partner, some people take a Switzerland approach where they partner with everyone. You had, WANdisco partners with all the cloud guys, I mean, they have unique ITP. So you have this model where you got to go out, do something, but you can't do it alone. Open source is a key part of this, so obviously that's part of the collaboration. This is a key thing. And then they're going to check off the boxes. Data integration, deep learning is a new way to kind of dig deeper. So the question I have for you is, the impact on developers, 'cause if you can connect the dots between open source, 90% of the software written will be already open source, 10% differentiated, and then the role of how people going to market with the enterprise of a partnership, you can almost connect the dots and saying it's kind of a community approach. So that leaves the question, what is the impact to developers? >> Well the impact to developers, first of all, is when you go to a community approach, and like some big players are going more community and partnership-oriented in hot new areas like if you look at some of the recent announcements in chatbots and those technologies, we have sort of a rapprochement between Microsoft and Facebook and so forth, or Microsoft and AWS. The impact for developers is that there's convergence among the companies that might have competed to the death in particular hot new areas, like you know, like I said, chatbot-enabled apps for mobile scenarios. And so it cuts short the platform wars fairly quickly, harmonizes around a common set of APIs for accessing a variety of competing offerings that really overlap functionally in many ways. For developers, it's simplification around a broader ecosystem where it's not so much competition on the underlying open source technologies, it's now competition to see who penetrates the mass market with actually valuable solutions that leverage one or more of those erstwhile competitors into some broader synthesis. You know, for example, the whole ramp up to the future of self-driving vehicles, and it's not clear who's going to dominate there. Will it be the vehicle manufacturers that are equipping their cars with all manner of computerized everything to do whatnot? Or will it be the up-and-comers? Will it be the computer companies like Apple and Microsoft and others who get real deep and invest fairly heavily in self-driving vehicle technology, and become themselves the new generation of automakers in the future? So, what we're getting is that going forward, developers want to see these big industry segments converge fairly rapidly around broader ecosystems, where it's not clear who will be the dominate player in 10 years. The developers don't really care, as long as there is consolidation around a common framework to which they can develop fairly soon. >> And open source is obviously a key role in this, and how is deep learning impacting some of the contributions that are being made, because we're starting to see the competitive advantage in collaboration on the community side is with the contributions from companies. For example, you mentioned TensorFlow multiple times yesterday from Google. I mean, that's a great contribution. If you're a young kind coming into the developer community, I mean, this is not normal. It wasn't like this before. People just weren't donating massive libraries of great stuff already pre-packaged, So all new dynamics emerging. Is that putting pressure on Amazon, is that putting pressure on AWS and others? >> It is. First of all, there is a fair amount of, I wouldn't call it first-mover advantage for TensorFlow, there've been a number of DL toolkits on the market, open source, for the last several years. But they achieved the deepest and broadest adoption most rapidly, and now they are a, TensorFlow is essentially a defacto standard in the way, that we just go back, betraying my age, 30, 40 years ago where you had two companies called SAS and SPSS that quickly established themselves as the go-to statistical modeling tools. And then they got a generation, our generation, of developers, or at least of data scientists, what became known as data scientists, to standardize around you're either going to go with SAS or SPSS if you're going to do data mining. Cut ahead to the 2010s now. The new generation of statistical modelers, it's all things DL and machine learning. And so SAS versus SPSS is ages ago, those companies are, those products still exist. But now, what are you going to get hooked on in school? What are you going to get hooked on in high school, for that matter, when you're just hobby-shopping DL? You'll probably get hooked on TensorFlow, 'cause they have the deepest and the broadest open source community where you learn this stuff. You learn the tools of the trade, you adopt that tool, and everybody else in your environment is using that tool, and you got to get up to speed. So the fact is, that broad adoption early on in a hot new area like DL, means tons. It means that essentially TensorFlow is the new Spark, where Spark, you know, once again, Spark just in the past five years came out real fast. And it's been eclipsed, as it were, on the stack of cool by TensorFlow. But it's a deepening stack of open source offerings. So the new generation of developers with data science workbenches, they just assume that there's Spark, and they're going to increasingly assume that there's TensorFlow in there. They're going to increasingly assume that there are the libraries and algorithms and models and so forth that are floating around in the open source space that they can use to bootstrap themselves fairly quickly. >> This is a real issue in the open source community which we talked, when we were in LA for the Open Source Summit, was exactly that. Is that, there are some projects that become fashionable, so for example, a cloud-native foundation, very relevant but also hot, really hot right now. A lot of people are jumping on board the cloud natives bandwagon, and rightfully so. A lot of work to be done there, and a lot of things to harvest from that growth. However, the boring blocking and tackling projects don't get all the fanfare but are still super relevant, so there's a real challenge of how do you nurture these awesome projects that we don't want to become like a nightclub where nobody goes anymore because it's not fashionable. Some of these open source projects are super important and have massive traction, but they're not as sexy, or flair-ish as some of that. >> Dl is not as sexy, or machine learning, for that matter, not as sexy as you would think if you're actually doing it, because the grunt work, John, as we know for any statistical modeling exercise, is data ingestion and preparation and so forth. That's 75% of the challenge for deep learning as well. But also for deep learning and machine learning, training the models that you build is where the rubber meets the road. You can't have a really strongly predictive DL model in terms of face recognition unless you train it against a fair amount of actual face data, whatever it is. And it takes a long time to train these models. That's what you hear constantly. I heard this constantly in the atrium talking-- >> Well that's a data challenge, is you need models that are adapting and you need real time, and I think-- >> Oh, here-- >> This points to the real new way of doing things, it's not yesterday's model. It's constantly evolving. >> Yeah, and that relates to something I read this morning or maybe it was last night, that Microsoft has made a huge investment in AI and deep learning machinery. They're doing amazing things. And one of the strategic advantages they have as a large, established solution provider with a search engine, Bing, is that from what I've been, this is something I read, I haven't talked to Microsoft in the last few hours to confirm this, that Bing is a source of training data that they're using for machine learning and I guess deep learning modeling for their own solutions or within their ecosystem. That actually makes a lot of sense. I mean, Google uses YouTube videos heavily in its deep learning for training data. So there's the whole issue of if you're a pipsqueak developer, some, you know, I'm sorry, this sounds patronizing. Some pimply-faced kid in high school who wants to get real deep on TensorFlow and start building and tuning these awesome kickass models to do face recognition, or whatever it might be. Where are you going to get your training data from? Well, there's plenty of open source database, or training databases out there you can use, but it's what everybody's using. So, there's sourcing the training data, there's labeling the training data, that's human-intensive, you need human beings to label it. There was a funny recent episode, or maybe it was a last-season episode of Silicone Valley that was all about machine learning and building and training models. It was the hot dog, not hot dog episode, it was so funny. They bamboozle a class on the show, fictionally. They bamboozle a class of college students to provide training data and to label the training data for this AI algorithm, it was hilarious. But where are you going to get the data? Where are you going to label it? >> Lot more work to do, that's basically what you're getting at. >> Jim: It's DevOps, you know, but it's grunt work. >> Well, we're going to kick off day two here. This is the SiliconeANGLE Media theCUBE, our fifth year doing our own event separate from O'Reilly media but in conjunction with their event in New York City. It's gotten much bigger here in New York City. We call it BigData NYC, that's the hashtag. Follow us on Twitter, I'm John Furrier, Jim Kobielus, we're here all day, we've got Peter Burris joining us later, head of research for Wikibon, and we've got great guests coming up, stay with us, be back with more after this short break. (rippling music)

Published Date : Sep 27 2017

SUMMARY :

This is Robin Matlock, the CMO of VMware, This is John Siegel of VPA Product Marketing This is Matthew Morgan, I'm the chief marketing officer Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media What is kind of the tea leaves that you're reading? That's a fair amount of the scuttlebutt I'm kind of critical on the O'Reilly show is really the conversation now. Doing something that changes the fabric So the question I have for you is, the impact on developers, among the companies that might have competed to the death and how is deep learning impacting some of the contributions You learn the tools of the trade, you adopt that tool, and a lot of things to harvest from that growth. That's 75% of the challenge for deep learning as well. This points to the in the last few hours to confirm this, that's basically what you're getting at. This is the SiliconeANGLE Media theCUBE,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Jim KobielusPERSON

0.99+

Robin MatlockPERSON

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Matthew MorganPERSON

0.99+

Basil FaruqiPERSON

0.99+

JimPERSON

0.99+

John SiegelPERSON

0.99+

O'Reilly MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

yesterdayDATE

0.99+

90%QUANTITY

0.99+

Peter BurrisPERSON

0.99+

two companiesQUANTITY

0.99+

New York CityLOCATION

0.99+

SPSORGANIZATION

0.99+

SASORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

75%QUANTITY

0.99+

LALOCATION

0.99+

Silicone ValleyTITLE

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

10%QUANTITY

0.99+

WalmartORGANIZATION

0.99+

2010sDATE

0.99+

YouTubeORGANIZATION

0.99+

SiliconANGLE MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

AtScaleORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

WANdiscoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeff VeisPERSON

0.99+

fifth yearQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

YesterdayDATE

0.99+

Dell EMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

eighth yearQUANTITY

0.99+

BigDataORGANIZATION

0.99+

millions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

BingORGANIZATION

0.99+

BMCORGANIZATION

0.98+

AmazonsORGANIZATION

0.98+

last nightDATE

0.98+

two kindsQUANTITY

0.98+

SparkTITLE

0.98+

HortonworksORGANIZATION

0.98+

Day oneQUANTITY

0.98+

20 years laterDATE

0.98+

VPAORGANIZATION

0.98+

2010DATE

0.98+

ActInORGANIZATION

0.98+

Open Source SummitEVENT

0.98+

one layerQUANTITY

0.98+

DruvaORGANIZATION

0.97+

AlexaTITLE

0.97+

day twoQUANTITY

0.97+

Bruno AzizaPERSON

0.97+

SPSSTITLE

0.97+

SwitzerlandLOCATION

0.97+

Two thingsQUANTITY

0.96+

NYCLOCATION

0.96+

WikibonORGANIZATION

0.96+

30DATE

0.95+

Wikibon.comORGANIZATION

0.95+

SiliconeANGLE MediaORGANIZATION

0.95+

O'ReillyORGANIZATION

0.95+

Day One Wrap | Veritas Vision 2017


 

>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas, it's the Cube, covering Veritas Vision 2017. Brought to you by Veritas. >> Welcome back to Veritas Vision, everybody. My name is Dave Vellante, I'm here with Stu Miniman. This is the Cube, the leader in live tech coverage. This is Day One wrap of the Veritas Vision conference. Veritas, as we said earlier, is a company that has gone through a number of changes, Stu. I mean, I remember when the company launched in 1983. It was sort of, you know, it was focused on backup. It was Veritas and Legato. And they kind of grew through the PC era and the client server era, really started to take off. And then they exploded in the internet era. Their evaluation went through the roof. They ended up buying C8's backup business. They really drove that and then got purchased by Symantec for a big number. I mean, I think the number was 15 billion. I mean, it was in the teens as I recall. Really never did much under Symantec, or, Symantec never did much with Veritas. I think they had a vision of information management and that never really panned out. Spun the company back out, devested it, sale to Carlyle and some other investors for, I thought the number was 8 billion, somebody told me 7 billion today. That must be net of cash. 2.3 billion dollars in revenue. My understanding from sources is that valuation is way, way up, nearly double from 2015. Now, maybe that's an inflated number, but I'm not surprised. The market's been booming. So that's sort of the inside organizational issues. We're here at The Aria, what do you say, Stu, a couple thousand people, 2500? >> Yeah, it's about 2000, Dave, and it's interesting, I talked to some people that had gone to the old Veritas Vision, years ago, and gotten up to about 4000 or 5000 people. But, grown since last year, good energy at the show. We got to talk to the Vox community people. They've got 10,000 people online contributing to their forums, participating, launched the VIP program for some of the super users they have here. Definitely good crowd in the keynote. Good people clapping and participating, getting excited. It surprised me a little bit the number one topic of conversation is GDPR. As you said in our last interview, we're going down the deep abyss of how you're going to get litigated out of all of your money if you don't follow this. It's like way worse than Y2K, ah, some stuff's going to break and maybe turn off for a bit. >> Well, you know what I liked about the GDPR discussions though, they had answers. >> Yeah. >> Other events where I've gone to GDPR, it's been scary, scary, scary, scare you, scare you, scare you, and then call us. >> Yeah. >> And we'll give you some services. What I liked about, what I'm hearing from Veritas is, they've got at least a quasi-prescription as to what to do. So that's good. But the more interesting part to me Stu is you've got this enterprise backup legacy, I'll say it, legacy backup install base, enormous. A leader, they've mentioned many times, 15 years in a row leader in the magic quadrant. And I believe it, you talk to customers, what are you running, NetBackup, everybody's running NetBackup. But how they're transitioning into this vision of multi-cloud, data protection resilience across the Enterprise, across clouds, hyper scale. What I'm not fully clear on yet is how they get customers from point A to point B. And we heard from the keynotes this morning and Bill Campbell. We invested a bunch of dough in R&D, we're writing stuff that's cloud-native, container-based, micro services. So sort of all the right application development buzzwords and I believe that they're developing there. But I don't understand how they migrate that install base. Is there some kind of abstraction layer? Is there some kind of new UI? We heard them jokingly say today in the keynotes that, we hear you, customers, we know our UI sucked, we're working on that. I didn't see any announcements on that, but, that's something that, presumably, is a promise they're putting forth. But, I wasn't clear, maybe you could help clear it up, on how you get from point A of legacy install backup software to this nirvana of multi-cloud hyper scale micro services. >> Yeah, I mean, Dave, when we talked to Bill Coleman, his three Vs, value, vision, and that values of the company itself, clearly has got a compelling vision. He said not only ten years from now, but probably five years from now, every product I'm selling is going to be obsolete. And it's an interesting thing to hear because 15 years of experience, we're trusted, but we know that every product that you bought from Veritas in the past is going to be replaced by new things. And, right, how do we get, say okay, I've been buying that backup for a decade, do I get this visualization product, and if I'm looking at AWS, is Veritas the company I turn to? So really it gets down to, Dave, that blocking and tackling. Talked about the consultants, the partners, both on the go to market side as well as the technology side. Can Veritas get in there, can they have compelling differentiated products that solve a need in the market? We've talked to a number of companies this last year where I've looked at is this hybrid multi-cloud world. If you're software, how do you play in this market? Because isn't Microsoft, Google, Amazon, aren't they going to just do this? Information governance invisibility, absolutely. Amazon has a solution for you. Google has a solution for you. Microsoft has solutions. But, if I'm going to be across those environments, we haven't had a solution that goes across all of those environments. So, there's a hole in the ecosystem, and Veritas, along with many other companies, are trying to put that big elephant on the table and eat pieces out of it, so, it's interesting. >> And Coleman's background, from BEA, started at BEA, I think he took the thing up to half a billion dollars, sold it to Oracle for a big number. But you look at what BEA did, they were sort of the application integration glue. And that's a lot of, you hear a lot of similar messaging modernized around multi-cloud, around hyper scale, around micro services and the like. So, Coleman obviously has experience doing that. I thought he's a very clear thinker. I had not met him before. Furrier knows him pretty well, from his VC days. But I thought he laid out a pretty clear direction. So he's got street cred on this. SEEP com, done it before, I think this company has a decent balance sheet. They seem to have some patient capital in Carlyle. It doesn't appear that Carlyle's trying to suck all the money out. They don't have the 90-day shot clock. He basically, Bill Coleman basically said, look, we're fine shrinking to grow. We're shifting from a upfront license model, perpetual license model, to a ratable model. We could never do that as a public company. So it's going to be very interesting to see if and when they emerge as a public company, what that looks like and where they come from. >> Yeah, and Dave, one of the things I've been poking at is where do they sell to? If this was the backup administrator, that's not somebody that's going to help them with the transformation. It's digital transformation, it's my cloud strategy. It's things like GDPR where I'm going to need to get up the stack to the CIO, to the C-suite, prove the value that Veritas has, and therefore they can then get all these new products in where everything, the 360 data management, really at the core of what they're doing, and whole lots of other products. I mean, Dave, we didn't even dig into some of the object and file storage pieces that are in here. I know we've got their chief product officer on the Cube tomorrow. But a lot of products, pretty broad software suite. And for an infrastructure company, it's always interesting to hear them say, really, infrastructure doesn't matter. The no hardware agenda, but it's your data that matters, and we've got a vision here at Veritas Vision to bring you forward and lots of plays on the name of the company. Veritas, the show is the truth in information. >> Yeah, so, let's talk about the lineup tomorrow. A lot of product stuff tomorrow. Mike Palmer's coming on, he gave a great keynote this morning. Very funny, he gave a scenario of the world ending because basically people didn't have their data act together. They had these images of Las Vegas hotels in chaos and waterfalls running through the hotels and drones attacking and just total chaos. So we're going to get into a lot of the portfolio stuff and I think try to answer, Stu, some of those questions that I raised about how do you get customers from point A, where they are today, to point B. Are you going to, how are you going to transition them. Are there financial incentives? Is there some kind of abstraction layer that you're developing? What is that framework that brings us to that nirvana? So, give you the last word here, Stu. >> Yeah, so looking forward to digging in more with some of the customers, some of the partners. Good energy at the show. It's exciting to be here for the first time. And looking forward to Day Two. >> All right, good, good wrap, Stu. Thank you, and thank you for watching. Go to siliconangle.com for all the news. We saw some Oracle news today. Hitachi changed its name or Pentaho changed its name, we're not really sure about that. But all the news on siliconangle.com, go to wikibon.com for all the research. And of course, thecube.net to see this show, replays, youtube.com/siliconangle is where we archive all this stuff. Lot of websites. >> Yeah, and make sure to subscribe on our YouTube channel. >> Yeah, please do subscribe on that YouTube channel and follow us on Twitter, @thecube, @stuminiman, @dvellante. That's a wrap Day One, this is The Cube, we'll see you tomorrow from Veritas Vision from Vegas, take care. (techno music)

Published Date : Sep 20 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Veritas. and the client server era, really started to take off. I talked to some people that had gone to Well, you know what I liked about the GDPR Other events where I've gone to GDPR, But the more interesting part to me Stu is you've got this in the past is going to be replaced by new things. So it's going to be very interesting to see Yeah, and Dave, one of the things Yeah, so, let's talk about the lineup tomorrow. And looking forward to Day Two. And of course, thecube.net to see this show, replays, That's a wrap Day One, this is The Cube, we'll see you

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

SymantecORGANIZATION

0.99+

Bill ColemanPERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Bill CampbellPERSON

0.99+

Mike PalmerPERSON

0.99+

2015DATE

0.99+

1983DATE

0.99+

CarlyleORGANIZATION

0.99+

VeritasORGANIZATION

0.99+

15 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

ColemanPERSON

0.99+

8 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

HitachiORGANIZATION

0.99+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

VegasLOCATION

0.99+

7 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

Stu MinimanPERSON

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

LegatoORGANIZATION

0.99+

Veritas VisionORGANIZATION

0.99+

10,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

2.3 billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

PentahoORGANIZATION

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

StuPERSON

0.99+

threeQUANTITY

0.99+

2500QUANTITY

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

5000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

GDPRTITLE

0.99+

point AOTHER

0.99+

BEAORGANIZATION

0.99+

Day TwoQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

Day OneQUANTITY

0.98+

thecube.netOTHER

0.97+

@stuminimanPERSON

0.97+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

The AriaORGANIZATION

0.96+

ten yearsQUANTITY

0.96+

Veritas VisionEVENT

0.96+

siliconangle.comOTHER

0.95+

@dvellantePERSON

0.95+

this morningDATE

0.95+

Y2KORGANIZATION

0.92+

wikibon.comOTHER

0.92+

SEEP comORGANIZATION

0.91+

about 4000QUANTITY

0.91+

Day Two Wrap Up | Nutanix .NEXT 2017


 

>> Announcer: Live from Washington D.C., it's theCube, covering .Next conference. Brought to you by Nutanix. >> We're back, this is Dave Vellante with Stu Miniman, and this the wrap of .Next, Nutanix's customer event, #NEXTConf and this is theCube, the leader in the live tech coverage for enterprise technology. Stu, second day. I got to say, Nutanix has always done a good job, innovative venues, they do funky, fun stuff with marketing, we haven't seen the end of it. We have another keynote today, there's a keynote tomorrow morning, big names, Bill McDermott's here, we just saw Peter MacKay, Chad Sakac is here. Who am I missing? >> Stu: Diane Greene >> Diane Gree was up yesterday. >> Y'know, thought leaders, had the CEO of NASDAQ on this morning Dave, y'know really good customers, thought leaders, Nutanix always makes me think a little bit, which I really enjoy. My fourth one of these Dave, usually by the fourth show I've gotten to, it's like I've seen it. Have we made progress, where are we going? >> I thought Sunil Podi's comment was really interesting, he said, "Look, we saw the trends, "we knew that hardware was going down." I mean, they're essentially admitting that they were a hardware oriented company, infrastructure company, we saw what was happening to infrastructure and hyper-converge, and we could just packed it up then, sold the company for a bunch of money, there were rumors floating around, you know they were pre-IPO, they easily could have sold this thing for a billion plus, all could have cashed out and made a buncha dough, and they said, "Y'know what, we're going to do something "different, we're going to go for it." You got to love the ambition, and so many companies today just can't weather that independent storm. I mean, you've seen it over and over and over again. The last billion dollar storage company that remained independent was NetApp, that was 14 years ago, now Nutanix isn't a storage company, but look around here, look at the analysts, a buncha storage guys that have grown up, and it's to me, Stu, it's a representation of what's happening in the marketplace. Storage as we know it is going away, and it always has transformed, y'know it used to be spinning disc drives, then it was subsystems, then it was the SAN, now it's evolving, these guys call it invisible infrastructure, call it whatever you want, but it's moving toward infrastructure as code, which is just a stepping stone to cloud. So your thoughts on the event, the ecosystem, and their position in the marketplace. >> Right, they reach a certain point, they've gone public, can they keep innovating? Look at a number of announcements there, we spent a lot of time talking about the new CloudZi service out there. >> Si? >> Zi. >> Zi, zi, sorry, you got it. (chuckles) >> Pronunciation of some of these, "it's Nutanix, right?" >> Nutonix, Nutanicks, (chuckles) >> They made jokes about the company last year, but this year, that's product, we're talking vision. The ink is still drying on the relationship with Google, doesn't mean they haven't been working for a while, but where this deal goes, interesting to see where it is six months from now, a year from now, because also Google, small player, I mean it wasn't to be honest, I was at the Red Hat Summit and they had a video of Andy Jassy saying, "We've extending AWS with OpenShift." And you're like wow. Red Hat has a position in a lot of clouds, but for Andy Jassy to make an appearance, Amazon, the behemoth in the cloud, that's good. Look, getting Diane Greene here, I said number one, it gives Nutanix credibility, number two it really pokes at VMware a little bit, she's like, "Oh, I did this before." And everybody's like, "Well, she's here now at Nutanix." Nutanix wants to be, that they've compared themselves to both Amazon, I think we hear it was Sunil or Dheeraj in an analyst session said they "want to be like the A Block." Not the V Block that EMC did, but the Amazon Block for the enterprise, or the next VMware, they talked about the new operating system. It's funny, in a lot of my circles, we've been trying to kill the operating system for a while, I need just enough operating system, I want to serverless and containerize all of these things because we need to modernize, and the old general-purpose processor and general-purpose operating system has come and gone, it's seen its day, but Nutanix has a play there. When I look at some of the things going on, we're talking about microsegmentation Dave, we're talking about multi-cloud and some interesting pieces. I like the ecosystem, I like that balance of how do you keep growing and expand where they can go into, leading the customers, but they're delivering today, they've got real products, they've got real growth, sure they have some challenges as to that competitive back and forth, but you asked Chad Sakac if this reminded him of Dell EMC, and kind of that partnership that they had for years, reminded me a little bit of kind of EMC and VMware too, once EMC bought VMware, VMware, the relationship they had, HP, and IBM, and other companies that they needed to treat as good or better than EMC. They're some of those tough relationships, and Dell with Nutanix, their partner, not only do they do Dell XC, but now they're doing like Pivotal on top of it, they can do Hyper-V deployments, Lenovo's another partner, Nutanix is broadening their approach, there's a lot of options out there and a lot of things to dig into, interesting, they keep growing their customers, keep delighting their customers, it reminds me of other shows we go to, Dave, like Amazon re:Invent, customers are super excited, You tell me about the Splunk conference and the ServiceNow conference where those customers are in there, they're excited, and Nutanix is another one of those, that every year you come, there's good solid content, there's a customer base that is growing and exciting and sharing, and that's a fun one to be part of. >> So, I want to ask you about VMware, it's kind of a good reference model. EMC paid out, I don't know, $630 million for VMware, which was the greatest acquisition in enterprise IT history, no question about it in terms of return. A couple questions for you, you were there at the time, you signed the original NDA between EMC and VMware, kind of sniffed em out. Would VMware's ascendancy been as fast and as successful, or even more successful, without EMC? Would VMware have got there on its own? >> I don't think so Dave, because my information that I had, and some of it's piecing together after the fact is VMware was really looking for that company to help them get to the next state. The fundraising was a little bit different back in 2003 than it was later, but rumors were Semantic was going to buy them. Everybody I talked to, you'd know better than me Dave, if Semantic had bought them, they would have integrated into all their pieces, they would have squashed it, the original talent probably would have fled much sooner. EMC didn't really know what they had, I had worked on some of the due diligence for some of the product integration, which took years and years to deliver, and it was mostly we're going to buy them. Diane had a bit of a tense relationship with Joe Tucci kind of from day one, and it was like okay, you're out there in Palo Alto, we're on the other coast, you go and do your thing, and you grow, and by the time EMC had gotten into VMware a little bit more, they were much bigger. So I think as you said, they're one of the great success stories, EMC did best in a lot of its acquisitions where it either let it ran a division and go, or let it kind of sit on its own and just funded it more, so I think that was a-- >> Well, and the story was always that Diane was pissed because she sold out at such a low price, but that's sort of ancient history. The reason I brought that up is I want to try to draw the parallel with Nutanix today, and come back to what you were saying about the A Block. When you look at Amazon, we agree, they have a lead, whether that lead is five years, seven years, four years, probably more like five to seven, but whatever, whatever it is, it's a lead, it's substantive. Beyond the infrastructure, the storage and the compute, they're building out just all kinds of services, I mean just look at their website, whether it's messaging, on and on and on, there's database, there's AI, there's their version of VDI, there's all this big data stuff, with things like Kinesis, and on and on and on, so many services that are much, much larger than the entire Nutanix ecosystem. So the reason for all this background is does Nutanix need a bigger, can Nutanix become it's ambition, which is essentially to be the next VMware, without some kind of white knight? >> So my answer, Dave, is if you look at Nutanix's ambition, one of the challenges for every infrastructure company today, if you think okay, we've talked about True Private Cloud, Dave, what services can I run on that? How can I leverage that? Look at Amazon, y'know a thousand new services coming every year, look at Google, they've got TensorFlow, really cool stuff, they've got those brilliant people coming up with the next stuff, how do I get that in my environment? Well, Nutanix's answer, coming at the show was we're going to partner with Google, we're going to have that partnership, you're going to be able to plug in, and you want to do your analytics and everything, use GCP, they're great at that, we're not, we know that you need to be able to leverage Google services to do that. The Red Hat announcement that I mentioned before, another way how I can take OpenShift and bridge from my data center and my environment and get access to those services. The promise of VMware on Amazon, yeah we're going to have a similar stack that I can go there, but I want to be able to access those VMware servers. Now, could it suck them eventually into all of Amazon and leave VMware behind? Absolutely, it's tough to partner with Amazon. So, the thing I've been looking at at almost every show this year is how are you tying into and working with those public clouds, we talked about it at VMON, Dave, they have Microsoft up on stage, they have partnerships with the public cloud-- >> David: HPE was up there. >> But the public cloud players, if you're not allowing your customers and the infrastructure that you're building to find ways to leverage and access those public cloud services, which not only are they spending $10 billion a year for each one of the big guys on infrastructure to get all around the globe, but it's all of those new services ahead, moving up the stack. To stitch together that in your own environment is going to be really challenging, how many different software pieces, how do I license it? How do I get it on, as opposed to oh, I'm in the public cloud, it's a checkbox, okay I want to access that, and I consume it as I need it, that consumption model needs to change, so I think Nutanix understands that's directionally where they want to go, I look at the Calm software that they launched and say hey, you want to use TensorFlow? Oh, it's just a choice here, absolutely, go. Where is it and how do I use it? Well, some of these details need to be worked out, as Detu said, "it's not like it's one click for every application, any cloud, anywhere." But that's directionally where they're going to make it easy, so all that cool analytic stuff that we cover a lot on theCube, a lot of that is now happening in the cloud, and I should be able to access it whether I'm in my private cloud or public cloud, and it's just going to be consumption model, whether I have certain characteristics that make it that I'm going to want to have that infrastructure for whether that's governance or locality, we talked to Scholastic yesterday, and they said, "Well when you've got manufacturing "in books, I need things close "to where they're coming off the production line, "otherwise there's things that I'm doing "in the public cloud." So that's there we see, when I talk to companies like I do here, at the Vienna show last year, when I talk to Christian Reilly with Citrix, who had been at Bechtel for many years, there's reasons why things need to live close to what's happening, y'know we've talked a lot about Edge, and therefore public cloud doesn't win it all, I know we had one guest on this week that said, "Right, depending on what industry you're is, "is it a 30/70 mix or a 70/30 mix?" There's a lot of nuance to sort this out, and this is long game, Dave, there's this change of the way we do things is a journey, and Nutanix has positioned themselves to continue to grow, continue to expand, some good ambition to expand on, like the five vectors of support that they have, so I've liked what I've heard this week. >> So in thinking about what we're talking about VMware, the imperative for virtualization was so high in the early 2000's because we were coming out of the dot com bust, IT was out of favor, VMware was really the only game in town, there really wasn't a strong alternative, had by far the best product, Microsoft Hyper-V was sort of in-concept, and KVM and others were just really not there, so there really was no choice, it appealed to 100% of the IT shops, I mean essentially. So I wonder though, today, is the imperative for multi-cloud the same? The fundamental is yes, everybody has multiple clouds. But this industry has lived in stovepipes forever, and has figured out how to manage stovepipes, it manages them by fencing things off. So I wonder is the imperative as high, you could maybe make an argument that it's higher, but I'm still not quite getting it yet, as it was in the early 2000's, where the aspirin of virtualization to soothe the pain of do more with less was such an obvious and game changing paradigm shift. I don't see it as much here, I see people still trying to figure out okay, what is our cloud strategy? Number one, number two is the competition seems to be much more wide open, it's unclear at this time that any one company has a fast-track to multi-cloud. >> I think you've got some really good points there, Dave. A thing that I've pointed out a few times is that one of the things that bothered me from the early days with VMware is from an application standpoint, it tended to freeze my application. I didn't have a reason to kind of move forward and modernize my application. Back in 2002 it was like oh, I'm running Windows NT with a really old application, my operating system going to end of life, well maybe it's time to uplift. Oh wait, there's this great virtualization stuff, my hardware's going end of life too. No, shove it in a VM, let's keep it for another five years. Oh my god, that application sucked then, it's going to suck even more in five years, and workforce productivity was way down. So, the vision for Nutanix is they're going to be a platform that are going to be able to help you modernize your environment and how do we get beyond, is it virtualization, is it containerization, is it a lot of the cloud-native pieces, how does that fit in? Starting to hear a little bit more of it, a critique I'd have on HCI about two years ago was it was the same applications that were in my VMware SAN, not VSAN, but my just traditional storage area network was what was running on Nutanix. We're starting to see more interesting applications going on there, and look, Nutanix has a bullseye on them, there are all the HCI direct replacements, there is the threat of the cloud, and I haven't heard as many SAAS applications living on Nutanix as I do when we talk to all flash-array companies, Dave, every single on of them can roll out, here's all these SAAS deployments on our environment, just scalable environments that build that for the future. I haven't heard it as much from Nutanix. >> So VMware was aspirin , Nutanix originally started as aspirin, and now they're pivoting to vitamin. Who are they up against? Who do you like? Who are the horses on the track? Let's analyze the race and then wrap. >> Yeah, so when Nutanix got into this business, it was well, they're helping VMware environments, it was 100% VMware when they first started that relationship with VMware was really tough, they've lowered that too, they've now got what, 28% is running HV, they've got a little bit on Hyper-V, but they've still got about 60% of their customers are VMware. So VMware, y'know, huge challenge, VSAN has more customers than anyone in the hyper-convergent infrastructure space, easy, number of customers, but virtualization admin has taken that. Microsoft, huge potential threat, Azure Stack's coming this year, it's been coming, it's been coming, it's really close there, all the server guys are lining up. Microsoft's a huge player, Microsoft owns applications, they're pulling applications into their SAAS offerings, they're pulling applications into Azure, when they launch Azure Stack, even if the 1.0, if you looked at it on paper and say Nutanix is better, well, Microsoft's a huge threat to both VMware, which uses a lot of Microsoft apps, as well as Nutanix. So those are the two biggest threats, then of course, there's just the general trend of push to SAAS and push to public cloud where Nutanix is starting to play in the multi-cloud, as we talked about, and COM and the DR cloud services are good, but can Nutanix continue to stay ahead of their customers? They're ahead of the vast majority of enterprises, but can they convince them to come on board to them, rather than some of these big guys? Nutanix is a public company now, they're doing great, but yeah, it's a big TAM that they're going after, but that means they're going to have a tax from every side of the market. >> I see HCI as one where you got a leader, and that leader can make some good money. I don't see multi-cloud as a winner-take-all market because I think IBM's going to have its play in multi-cloud, HPE has its play in multi-cloud, Dell EMC is going to have its play in multi-cloud. You got guys coming out of different places like ServiceNow, who's got an IT operations management practice, builds business big, hundreds of millions of dollars of business there, coming at multi-cloud, so a lot of different competitors that are going to be going for it, and some of them with very large service organizations that I think are going to get there fair share, so I would predict, Stu, that this is going to continue to be, multi-cloud is going to be a multi-stovepipe cloud for a long, long time. Now, if Nutanix can come in and solve that control plane problem, and demonstrate substantial business value, and deliver competitive advantage, y'know that might change the game. It's difficult at this point in 2017 to see that Nutanix, over those other guys that I just mentioned, has an advantage, clear advantage, maybe from a product standpoint, maybe. But from a resource standpoint, a distribution channel, services organization, ecosystem, all those other things, they seem to me to be counterbalancing. Alright, I'll give you last thought. >> Yeah, so it's great to see Nutanix, they're aiming high, they're expanding into a couple of areas, and they keep listening, so I hope they keep listening to their customers, expand their partnerships, SAAS customers would be really interesting, service provider is something that they've gotten into little bit, but plenty more opportunity for them to go there. Dave, personally for me, to it have been a company I've watched since the earliest days, it's been a pleasure to watch, y'know I think back, right, VMware you said, I think it was a hundred person company when I first started talking to them and Diane Greene, and I look at where VMware went. I've been tracking VMware for now five years, and reminds me a lot of some of those trends, for a 20 person company, I said to hear almost 3000 boggles the mind, I've been to their headquarters a bunch. So it's been fun to watch the Newton army, and they've been loving watching it from our angles. >> Well and these events are very good events, and so there's a lot of passion here, and that's a great fundamental for this company. So I'm a fan, I think it may be undervalued, I think it very well may be undervalued. >> Wall Street definitely doesn't understand this stuff. >> Alright Stu, great working with you this year, (chuckles) this month, this quarter, this month, certainly this show, so great job. I really appreciate it >> Stu: Thanks, Dave. >> There's a big crew behind what Stu and I, and John Ferrier, and Jeff Frick, and others do here. Here today with us Ava, Patrick, Alex, Jay, you guys have had an awesome spring. Brendan is somewhere, I guess Brendan is doing the keynote right now. So, fantastic job, as always, Kristen Nicole and her team, writing up the articles. Jay Johanson back at the controls, Bert with the crowd shots. Everybody, really appreciate all your support, thanks for watching everybody. We'll see you, we got a little break, I think, in the action, cause it's July Fourth, well it's Canada year, or Canada week-- >> Canada Day and Independence Day next week. >> And Independence Day in the United States, and then we'll be at Infor Inforum, second week of July, I'll be there with Rebecca Knight and the crew, so watch for that, check out SiliconAngle.com for all the news, Wikibon.com for all the research, and theCube.net to find all these videos, Youtube.com/SiliconAngle, it's everywhere, if you can't find it, you're not on Twitter, you're not on social. Thanks for watching, everybody. This is Dave Vellante with Stu Miniman, we're out. (lo-fi synthesizer music)

Published Date : Jun 29 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Nutanix. I got to say, Nutanix has always done a good job, Have we made progress, where are we going? and it's to me, Stu, it's a representation Look at a number of announcements there, (chuckles) HP, and IBM, and other companies that they needed to treat it's kind of a good reference model. and it was mostly we're going to buy them. and come back to what you were saying about the A Block. and get access to those services. and it's just going to be consumption model, and has figured out how to manage stovepipes, be a platform that are going to be able to help you Who are the horses on the track? but that means they're going to have that are going to be going for it, boggles the mind, I've been to their headquarters a bunch. and so there's a lot of passion here, Alright Stu, great working with you this year, is doing the keynote right now. and theCube.net to find all these videos,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
DavidPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Justin WarrenPERSON

0.99+

Sanjay PoonenPERSON

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

ClarkePERSON

0.99+

David FloyerPERSON

0.99+

Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

Dave VolantePERSON

0.99+

GeorgePERSON

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

Diane GreenePERSON

0.99+

Michele PalusoPERSON

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

Sam LightstonePERSON

0.99+

Dan HushonPERSON

0.99+

NutanixORGANIZATION

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

KevinPERSON

0.99+

Andy ArmstrongPERSON

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

Pat GelsingerPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Kevin SheehanPERSON

0.99+

Leandro NunezPERSON

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

AlibabaORGANIZATION

0.99+

NVIDIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

EMCORGANIZATION

0.99+

GEORGANIZATION

0.99+

NetAppORGANIZATION

0.99+

KeithPERSON

0.99+

Bob MetcalfePERSON

0.99+

VMwareORGANIZATION

0.99+

90%QUANTITY

0.99+

SamPERSON

0.99+

Larry BiaginiPERSON

0.99+

Rebecca KnightPERSON

0.99+

BrendanPERSON

0.99+

DellORGANIZATION

0.99+

PeterPERSON

0.99+

Clarke PattersonPERSON

0.99+

Wrap Up with Jeff Frick and Lisa Martin - Food IT 2017 - #FoodIT #theCUBE


 

>> Announcer: Live from the Computer History Museum, in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE, covering Food IT, Fork to Farm. Brought to you by Western Digital. >> Welcome back to theCUBE, I'm Lisa Martin, with Jeff Frick, and we have just spent a really interesting educational day at the Fork to Farm event, Food IT. Jeff we've spoken with investors, ag-tech experts, folks in academia who are training the next generation of farmers, to Campbell Soup, who's been around since the late 1800s, are really focused on helping the agriculture and food industry combat the challenges of environmental sustainability, of climate change, of labor shortages, it's been a really, really intriguing day, where tech meets food and agriculture. >> Yeah and just a huge opportunity. One of the themes that kept coming up over and over again, is the average age of the farmers today. Heard 70 something, 60 something, whatever, they're getting old, so there's going to be a huge turnover in this industry, so both a challenge as well as an opportunity for the next generation of ag-people to make some of these changes, and change the way the industry works. The other thing that's really interesting that I found Lisa, is that there's really big social issues that are at play here. We talked about water, we talked about labor, that play into this whole thing, sustainability. And again, tying it back to their theme of its fork to farm, how much of that's now driven by the consumer and the industry, it's kind of a reaction to the consumer, which we see over and over and over in all the other shows that we go. The consumerization IT, driven by younger people's interactions with their phones, is setting an expectation of the way they want everything to work. And so, it sounds like the food industry is really at the cutting edge of this, still really early on, but as we saw in some of those market maps, and the innovation is rich, feels like we're really at the start of this thing. So even though this show has been around for a few years, they have the big show in Salinas next week, the Forbes show, that's still really early days of leveraging tech, innovation, to change the food industry. >> It is, and you brought up that the labor shortages, and that was echoed quite a bit today, for a number of reasons. One, the aging population of farmers as you mentioned. Two, also in California, the minimum wage going up, and that's not only going to be a problem Jeff for farmers, but it's actually now pervading into the retail space, where they're going to have to start depending on robotics to be able to create, or to reduce their cost, to provide even fast food. That was something that was quite interesting to me, I hadn't really quite thought about, from that channel perspective. >> Right, right. >> And then as you mentioned, on the tech enabled consumer side, I was talking with Jeff earlier, I kept thinking farm to fork, 'cause farm to table is so trendy now, right? There's a lot of apps. And you gave me this a-ha grasshopper look, and it was really because as consumers we've really demanded so much. We want transparency, we want to know exactly what's in things, and we want organic, and hormone-free, and we also want things delivered whenever, and wherever we want them. We think of the distribution model, has really become very decentralized, and a lot of that being driven by the consumer. On the farm side too, regarding the attrition, there's also a lot of antiquated, especially in the post-harvest supply chain, things that are still written down on paper, traceability is a huge challenge for them. And I think from some of the things we heard today, a lot of the farming, especially in California, they can't really quite see all the data that they have, but they are sitting on a lot of information, that not only could make their farms more efficient, but could also facilitate you think, even knowledge transfer to the next generation of farmers. Right, right. Yeah a lot of talk about kind of there wasn't a lot of data, now it's a data flood. So how do you use those data sources to be more intelligent in what you do? And I specifically asked some of the guests, you know, are kind of the classic big data players participating in this space, and she said, "Not really." They're all kind of holding off on the side waiting to get in. But these are big numbers, this is a big impact. The professor from St. Louis Episcopal talked about a billion dollars worth of strawberries that you got to get off the field, and if you don't have the labor to get it off, and the data to get the labor and to time it right, it's a billion dollars worth of strawberries, and these are big numbers. And the other thing that just fascinated me, is again, this power of the consumer. The Google guy who took basically what was a service just to feed employees and keep them around so they write more code, but using that as a platform to drive much more thoughtfulness and intelligence. And supply chain changes around food, and even called it food shot in reference to the moon shot. >> The moon shot, yes. >> Enabled better diets, shift diets, food transparency, reduced loss and waste, accelerate transformation to a circular food economy. So, and they said, I think he's been at it for 15 years or thereabout. So really an interesting kind of a twist, on what you would not expect from the food service people, you think of them just supplying food. >> Exactly. >> Not trying to drive cultural change. >> Exactly, and trying to scale, but they're using data from their own googlers, to help determine and evaluate what people are doing, what they want, preferences, making it more personal, and using data in that way to also then facilitate some of the upstream, you know from the supply perspective, making things, meeting those challenges that the consumers are demanding, but you said he's been at Google for five years, and when he first got the call being in hospitality for so long, he just thought, "Google, what do they want to talk to me for?" And how revolutionary they've been, and you can think of how much education can happen from Google Food alone. I was quite blown away by that. >> Yeah, the other kind of theme is unused resources. So, one of the food trucks that they had seaweed. Why seaweed? Because it takes no fresh water, it takes no fertilizer, and it's carbon negative. So not really about how does it taste, but some specific reasons to try to make seaweed a better food, a more satisfying food. Talked about kale, and really again what a great example of a, can't say it, Fork to Farm tradition, 'cause before kale was a throwaway, nobody grew kale, now suddenly everybody wants kale smoothies, and so there's nothing, plant became something of importance, driven by the consumer, not necessarily by the producers. So, very dynamic times. I think again, the trend we see over and over and over, finding the hollowing out of the middle. You know, you don't want to be just a generic provider in the middle, you better have massive scale, or you better be a real specialty provider. And then finally the ramifications of the Amazon purchase of Whole Foods, really validating, yes you want digital, yes you want data, yes you want to provide better customer service. But at the same time, you still need a physical presence, kind of validating the physical presence of the store like Whole Foods. So really a very dynamic activity going on in this space. >> And it'll be interesting to see what happens over the next five to 10 years, as farming generationally changes hands. And there is technology that's available today, right? We talked about big data, there's many, many sources of public data, whether it's satellite imagery, water data that can be utilized and then paired with private data that a farm has. Or using GPS devices on tractors and combines, robotics. You talked to the inventor of the Sally Salad machine, there's a lot of technology that might be, I don't know if I'd say ahead of its time, but I think from a farming perspective, there's a little bit of a gap there right now. So it'll be very interesting to see how farms evolve from a technology perspective. I love how the Forbes AgTech Summit, I think it's tomorrow and Thursday in Salinas Valley, what a great juxtaposition of Silicon Valley and a world hub of technology innovation, to Salinas, which is the salad bowl of the world. I think that is quite interesting, and some of the dynamics that they've seen, I think this was their fourth event tomorrow. >> Jeff: Fourth event, right, right. >> Really starting to get more farmers interested in understanding the potential that ag-tech can have on profitability, efficiencies, reducing waste, even things like discovering and preventing foodborne pathogens. >> Right, and robots, we need robots, we don't have enough labor. Michael Rose said there's going to be a shortage of hundreds of thousands of line cooks. Just regular, ordinary line cooks at restaurants, and that's really kind of one of the applications of the salad machine, because as you hit the button below that cook, you can hit the button to load that salad, while you run off and pull the rest of the entree meals together. So, again, it's really fun to see the consistent themes that we see over and over, that's computing cloud and data-driven decision making, applied to what's arguably one of the most important things going on, which is feeding us a lot of conversation about the world's population getting to 10 billion in the not too distant future, that have to be fed. And again, with the aging of the population, the traditional farmers, a real opportunity to do kind of a refresh with a bunch of people that have grown up with these things. So, really cool show, a great day, hope you had fun, I had fun. >> Oh, I had a great time, it was really educational. I think that you hit the nail on the head, there's a tremendous amount of opportunity. I think what the Mixing Bowl is doing, along with Better Foods, is really bringing the people that are creating food, and producing it together, and connecting them with the people that are creating technology. So, I think this is the tip of the iceberg head of lettuce, maybe? So, I am excited to see what happens over time, but not only was it a great event, but I'm now very hungry. >> Now you're very hungry, there's more food trucks outside. Alright Lisa, well thank you again for hosting. >> Thank you. >> Again, another great show. I think last time we were together was at the NAB. >> NAB. >> Talking about media entertainment, so the digitization, transformation continues, driven by all these huge macro-factors of cloud, big data, so the beat rolls on. >> It does. >> Alright, she's Lisa Martin, and I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching theCube. Thanks for watching, we've got a busy spring coming to an end. Had a little bit of a lull in the summer then we'll hit it hard again in the fall, so thanks for watching siliconangle.tv, youtube.com/siliconangle, and siliconangle.com for complete coverage of a lot of stories beyond just theCUBE. I'm Jeff Frick, signing off with Lisa Martin from Food IT, from Fork to Food, thanks for watching.

Published Date : Jun 29 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Western Digital. at the Fork to Farm event, Food IT. and the industry, it's kind of a reaction to the consumer, and that's not only going to be a problem Jeff for farmers, and the data to get the labor and to time it right, So, and they said, I think he's been at it Not trying to drive and you can think of how much education can happen of the Amazon purchase of Whole Foods, and some of the dynamics that they've seen, and preventing foodborne pathogens. and that's really kind of one of the applications is really bringing the people that are creating food, Alright Lisa, well thank you again for hosting. I think last time we were together was at the NAB. so the digitization, transformation continues, Had a little bit of a lull in the summer

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Lisa MartinPERSON

0.99+

Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

Michael RosePERSON

0.99+

Whole FoodsORGANIZATION

0.99+

Western DigitalORGANIZATION

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

LisaPERSON

0.99+

CaliforniaLOCATION

0.99+

15 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

Silicon ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

10 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

Salinas ValleyLOCATION

0.99+

next weekDATE

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

Fourth eventQUANTITY

0.99+

fourth eventQUANTITY

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

ThursdayDATE

0.99+

Google FoodORGANIZATION

0.98+

Better FoodsORGANIZATION

0.98+

TwoQUANTITY

0.98+

late 1800sDATE

0.98+

SalinasLOCATION

0.98+

todayDATE

0.98+

firstQUANTITY

0.96+

bothQUANTITY

0.96+

Forbes AgTech SummitEVENT

0.96+

billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.96+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

Fork to FarmEVENT

0.95+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.94+

hundreds of thousandsQUANTITY

0.92+

oneQUANTITY

0.91+

NABEVENT

0.91+

ForkORGANIZATION

0.89+

10 yearsQUANTITY

0.87+

70 somethingQUANTITY

0.83+

Mixing BowlORGANIZATION

0.82+

about a billion dollarsQUANTITY

0.81+

fiveQUANTITY

0.81+

youtube.com/siliconangleORGANIZATION

0.8+

ForbesTITLE

0.75+

60 somethingQUANTITY

0.74+

Food ITORGANIZATION

0.73+

EpiscopalPERSON

0.71+

2017DATE

0.71+

FoodORGANIZATION

0.68+

Campbell SoupPERSON

0.68+

#FoodITORGANIZATION

0.66+

Sally SaladCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.65+

Food ITTITLE

0.65+

someQUANTITY

0.58+

siliconangle.tvORGANIZATION

0.55+

ForkEVENT

0.51+

to FarmORGANIZATION

0.48+

theCubeTITLE

0.46+

siliconangle.comTITLE

0.43+

St. LouisLOCATION

0.43+

Computer History MuseumORGANIZATION

0.41+

Wrap Up | IBM Fast Track Your Data 2017


 

>> Narrator: Live from Munich Germany, it's theCUBE, covering IBM, Fast Track Your Data. Brought to you by IBM. >> We're back. This is Dave Vellante with Jim Kobielus, and this is theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. We go out to the events. We extract the signal from the noise. We are here covering special presentation of IBM's Fast Track your Data, and we're in Munich Germany. It's been a day-long session. We started this morning with a panel discussion with five senior level data scientists that Jim and I hosted. Then we did CUBE interviews in the morning. We cut away to the main tent. Kate Silverton did a very choreographed scripted, but very well done, main keynote set of presentations. IBM made a couple of announcements today, and then we finished up theCUBE interviews. Jim and I are here to wrap. We're actually running on IBMgo.com. We're running live. Hilary Mason talking about what she's doing in data science, and also we got a session on GDPR. You got to log in to see those sessions. So go ahead to IBMgo.com, and you'll find those. Hit the schedule and go to the Hilary Mason and GDP our channels, and check that out, but we're going to wrap now. Jim two main announcements today. I hesitate to call them big announcements. I mean they were you know just kind of ... I think the word you used last night was perfunctory. You know I mean they're okay, but they're not game changing. So what did you mean? >> Well first of all, when you look at ... Though IBM is not calling this a signature event, it's essentially a signature event. They do these every June or so. You know in the past several years, the signature events have had like a one track theme, whether it be IBM announcing their investing deeply in Spark, or IBM announcing that they're focusing on investing in R as the core language for data science development. This year at this event in Munich, it's really a three track event, in terms of the broad themes, and I mean they're all important tracks, but none of them is like game-changing. Perhaps IBM doesn't intend them to be it seems like. One of which is obviously Europe. We're holding this in Munich. And a couple of things of importance to European customers, first and foremost GDPR. The deadline next year, in terms of compliance, is approaching. So sound the alarm as it were. And IBM has rolled out compliance or governance tools. Download and the go from the information catalog, governance catalog and so forth. Now announcing the consortium with Hortonworks to build governance on top of Apache Atlas, but also IBM announcing that they've opened up a DSX center in England and a machine-learning hub here in Germany, to help their European clients, in those countries especially, to get deeper down into data science and machine learning, in terms of developing those applicants. That's important for the audience, the regional audience here. The second track, which is also important, and I alluded to it. It's governance. In all of its manifestations you need a master catalog of all the assets for building and maintaining and controlling your data applications and your data science applications. The catalog, the consortium, the various offerings at IBM is announced and discussed in great detail. They've brought in customers and partners like Northern Trust, talk about the importance of governance, not just as a compliance mandate, but also the potential strategy for monetizing your data. That's important. Number three is what I call cloud native data applications and how the state of the art in developing data applications is moving towards containerized and orchestrated environments that involve things like Docker and Kubernetes. The IBM DB2 developer community edition. Been in the market for a few years. The latest version they announced today includes kubernetes support. Includes support for JSON. So it's geared towards new generation of cloud and data apps. What I'm getting at ... Those three core themes are Europe governance and cloud native data application development. Each of them is individually important, but none of them is game changer. And one last thing. Data science and machine learning, is one of the overarching envelope themes of this event. They've had Hilary Mason. A lot of discussion there. My sense I was a little bit disappointed because there wasn't any significant new announcements related to IBM evolving their machine learning portfolio into deep learning or artificial intelligence in an environment where their direct competitors like Microsoft and Google and Amazon are making a huge push in AI, in terms of their investments. There's a bit of a discussion, and Rob Thomas got to it this morning, about DSX. Working with power AI, the IBM platform, I would like to hear more going forward about IBM investments in these areas. So I thought it was an interesting bunch of announcements. I'll backtrack on perfunctory. I'll just say it was good that they had this for a lot of reasons, but like I said, none of these individual announcements is really changing the game. In fact like I said, I think I'm waiting for the fall, to see where IBM goes in terms of doing something that's actually differentiating and innovative. >> Well I think that the event itself is great. You've got a bunch of partners here, a bunch of customers. I mean it's active. IBM knows how to throw a party. They've always have. >> And the sessions are really individually awesome. I mean terms of what you learn. >> The content is very good. I would agree. The two announcements that were sort of you know DB2, sort of what I call community edition. Simpler, easier to download. Even Dave can download DB2. I really don't want to download DB2, but I could, and play with it I guess. You know I'm not database guy, but those of you out there that are, go check it out. And the other one was the sort of unified data governance. They tried to tie it in. I think they actually did a really good job of tying it into GDPR. We're going to hear over the next, you know 11 months, just a ton of GDPR readiness fear, uncertainty and doubt, from the vendor community, kind of like we heard with Y2K. We'll see what kind of impact GDPR has. I mean it looks like it's the real deal Jim. I mean it looks like you know this 4% of turnover penalty. The penalties are much more onerous than any other sort of you know, regulation that we've seen in the past, where you could just sort of fluff it off. Say yeah just pay the fine. I think you're going to see a lot of, well pay the lawyers to delay this thing and battle it. >> And one of our people in theCUBE that we interviewed, said it exactly right. It's like the GDPR is like the inverse of Y2K. In Y2K everybody was freaking out. It was actually nothing when it came down to it. Where nobody on the street is really buzzing. I mean the average person is not buzzing about GDPR, but it's hugely important. And like you said, I mean some serious penalties may be in the works for companies that are not complying, companies not just in Europe, but all around the world who do business with European customers. >> Right okay so now bring it back to sort of machine learning, deep learning. You basically said to Rob Thomas, I see machine learning here. I don't see a lot of the deep learning stuff quite yet. He said stay tuned. You know you were talking about TensorFlow and things like that. >> Yeah they supported that ... >> Explain. >> So Rob indicated that IBM very much, like with power AI and DSX, provides an open framework or toolkit for plugging in your, you the developers, preferred machine learning or deep learning toolkit of an open source nature. And there's a growing range of open source deep learning toolkits beyond you know TensorFlow, including Theano and MXNet and so forth, that IBM is supporting within the overall ESX framework, but also within the power AI framework. In other words they've got those capabilities. They're sort of burying that message under a bushel basket, at least in terms of this event. Also one of the things that ... I said this too Mena Scoyal. Watson data platform, which they launched last fall, very important product. Very important platform for collaboration among data science professionals, in terms of the machine learning development pipeline. I wish there was more about the Watson data platform here, about where they're taking it, what the customers are doing with it. Like I said a couple of times, I see Watson data platform as very much a DevOps tool for the new generation of developers that are building machine learning models directly into their applications. I'd like to see IBM, going forward turn Watson data platform into a true DevOps platform, in terms of continuous integration of machine learning and deep learning another statistical models. Continuous training, continuous deployment, iteration. I believe that's where they're going, or probably she will be going. I'd like to see more. I'm expecting more along those lines going forward. What I just described about DevOps for data science is a big theme that we're focusing on at Wikibon, in terms where the industry is going. >> Yeah, yeah. And I want to come back to that again, and get an update on what you're doing within your team, and talk about the research. Before we do that, I mean one of the things we talked about on theCUBE, in the early days of Hadoop is that the guys are going to make the money in this big data business of the practitioners. They're not going to see, you know these multi-hundred billion dollar valuations come out of the Hadoop world. And so far that prediction has held up well. It's the Airbnbs and the Ubers and the Spotifys and the Facebooks and the Googles, the practitioners who are applying big data, that are crushing it and making all the money. You see Amazon now buying Whole Foods. That in our view is a data play, but who's winning here, in either the vendor or the practitioner community? >> Who's winning are the startups with a hot new idea that's changing, that's disrupting some industry, or set of industries with machine learning, deep learning, big data, etc. For example everybody's, with bated breath, waiting for you know self-driving vehicles. And the ecosystem as it develops somebody's going to clean up. And one or more companies, companies we probably never heard of, leveraging everything we're describing here today, data science and containerized distributed applications that involve you know deep learning for you know image analysis and sensor analyst and so forth. Putting it all together in some new fabric that changes the way we live on this planet, but as you said the platforms themselves, whether they be Hadoop or Spark or TensorFlow, whatever, they're open source. You know and the fact is, by it's very nature, open source based solutions, in terms of profit margins on selling those, inexorably migrate to zero. So you're not going to make any money as a tool vendor, or a platform vendor. You got to make money ... If you're going to make money, you make money, for example from providing an ecosystem, within which innovation can happen. >> Okay we have a few minutes left. Let's talk about the research that you're working on. What's exciting you these days? >> Right, right. So I think a lot of people know I've been around the analyst space for a long long time. I've joined the SiliconANGLE Wikibon team just recently. I used to work for a very large solution provider, and what I do here for Wikibon is I focus on data science as the core of next generation application development. When I say next-generation application development, it's the development of AI, deep learning machine learning, and the deployment of those data-driven statistical assets into all manner of application. And you look at the hot stuff, like chatbots for example. Transforming the experience in e-commerce on mobile devices. Siri and Alexa and so forth. Hugely important. So what we're doing is we're focusing on AI and everything. We're focusing on containerization and building of AI micro-services and the ecosystem of the pipelines and the tools that allow you to do that. DevOps for data science, distributed training, federated training of statistical models, so forth. We are also very much focusing on the whole distributed containerized ecosystem, Docker, Kubernetes and so forth. Where that's going, in terms of changing the state of the art, in terms of application development. Focusing on the API economy. All of those things that you need to wrap around the payload of AI to deliver it into every ... >> So you're focused on that intersection between AI and the related topics and the developer. Who is winning in that developer community? Obviously Amazon's winning. You got Microsoft doing a good job there. Google, Apple, who else? I mean how's IBM doing for example? Maybe name some names. Who do you who impresses you in the developer community? But specifically let's start with IBM. How is IBM doing in that space? >> IBM's doing really well. IBM has been for quite a while, been very good about engaging with new generation of developers, using spark and R and Hadoop and so forth to build applications rapidly and deploy them rapidly into all manner of applications. So IBM has very much reached out to, in the last several years, the Millennials for whom all of this, these new tools, have been their core repertoire from the very start. And I think in many ways, like today like developer edition of the DB2 developer community edition is very much geared to that market. Saying you know to the cloud native application developer, take a second look at DB2. There's a lot in DB2 that you might bring into your next application development initiative, alongside your spark toolkit and so forth. So IBM has startup envy. They're a big old company. Been around more than a hundred years. And they're trying to, very much bootstrap and restart their brand in this new context, in the 21st century. I think they're making a good effort at doing it. In terms of community engagement, they have a really good community engagement program, all around the world, in terms of hackathons and developer days, you know meetups here and there. And they get lots of turnout and very loyal customers and IBM's got to broadest portfolio. >> So you still bleed a little bit of blue. So I got to squeeze it out of you now here. So let me push a little bit on what you're saying. So DB2 is the emphasis here, trying to position DB2 as appealing for developers, but why not some of the other you know acquisitions that they've made? I mean you don't hear that much about Cloudant, Dash TV, and things of that nature. You would think that that would be more appealing to some of the developer communities than DB2. Or am I mistaken? Is it IBM sort of going after the core, trying to evolve that core you know constituency? >> No they've done a lot of strategic acquisitions like Cloudant, and like they've acquired Agrath Databases and brought them into their platform. IBM has every type of database or file system that you might need for web or social or Internet of Things. And so with all of the development challenges, IBM has got a really high-quality, fit-the-purpose, best-of-breed platform, underlying data platform for it. They've got huge amounts of developers energized all around the world working on this platform. DB2, in the last several years they've taken all of their platforms, their legacy ... That's the wrong word. All their existing mature platforms, like DB2 and brought them into the IBM cloud. >> I think legacy is the right word. >> Yeah, yeah. >> These things have been around for 30 years. >> And they're not going away because they're field-proven and ... >> They are evolving. >> And customers have implemented them everywhere. And they're evolving. If you look at how IBM has evolved DB2 in the last several years into ... For example they responded to the challenge from SAP HANA. We brought BLU Acceleration technology in memory technology into DB2 to make it screamingly fast and so forth. IBM has done a really good job of turning around these product groups and the product architecture is making them cloud first. And then reaching out to a new generation of cloud application developers. Like I said today, things like DB2 developer community edition, it's just the next chapter in this ongoing saga of IBM turning itself around. Like I said, each of the individual announcements today is like okay that's interesting. I'm glad to see IBM showing progress. None of them is individually disruptive. I think the last week though, I think Hortonworks was disruptive in the sense that IBM recognized that BigInsights didn't really have a lot of traction in the Hadoop spaces, not as much as they would have wished. Hortonworks very much does, and IBM has cast its lot to work with HDP, but HDP and Hortonworks recognizes they haven't achieved any traction with data scientists, therefore DSX makes sense, as part of the Hortonworks portfolio. Likewise a big sequel makes perfect sense as the sequel front end to the HDP. I think the teaming of IBM and Hortonworks is propitious of further things that they'll be doing in the future, not just governance, but really putting together a broader cloud portfolio for the next generation of data scientists doing work in the cloud. >> Do you think Hortonworks is a legitimate acquisition target for IBM. >> Of course they are. >> Why would IBM ... You know educate us. Why would IBM want to acquire Hortonworks? What does that give IBM? Open source mojo, obviously. >> Yeah mojo. >> What else? >> Strong loyalty with the Hadoop market with developers. >> The developer angle would supercharge the developer angle, and maybe make it more relevant outside of some of those legacy systems. Is that it? >> Yeah, but also remember that Hortonworks came from Yahoo, the team that developed much of what became Hadoop. They've got an excellent team. Strategic team. So in many ways, you can look at Hortonworks as one part aqui-hire if they ever do that and one part really substantial and growing solution portfolio that in many ways is complementary to IBM. Hortonworks is really deep on the governance of Hadoop. IBM has gone there, but I think Hortonworks is even deeper, in terms of their their laser focus. >> Ecosystem expansion, and it actually really wouldn't be that expensive of an acquisition. I mean it's you know north of ... Maybe a billion dollars might get it done. >> Yeah. >> You know so would you pay a billion dollars for Hortonworks? >> Not out of my own pocket. >> No, I mean if you're IBM. You think that would deliver that kind of value? I mean you know how IBM thinks about about acquisitions. They're good at acquisitions. They look at the IRR. They have their formula. They blue-wash the companies and they generally do very well with acquisitions. Do you think Hortonworks would fit profile, that monetization profile? >> I wouldn't say that Hortonworks, in terms of monetization potential, would match say what IBM has achieved by acquiring the Netezza. >> Cognos. >> Or SPSS. I mean SPSS has been an extraordinarily successful ... >> Well the day IBM acquired SPSS they tripled the license fees. As a customer I know, ouch, it worked. It was incredibly successful. >> Well, yeah. Cognos was. Netezza was. And SPSS. Those three acquisitions in the last ten years have been extraordinarily pivotal and successful for IBM to build what they now have, which is really the most comprehensive portfolio of fit-to-purpose data platform. So in other words all those acquisitions prepared IBM to duke it out now with their primary competitors in this new field, which are Microsoft, who's newly resurgent, and Amazon Web Services. In other words, the two Seattle vendors, Seattle has come on strong, in a way that almost Seattle now in big data in the cloud is eclipsing Silicon Valley, in terms of where you know ... It's like the locus of innovation and really of customer adoption in the cloud space. >> Quite amazing. Well Google still hanging in there. >> Oh yeah. >> Alright, Jim. Really a pleasure working with you today. Thanks so much. Really appreciate it. >> Thanks for bringing me on your team. >> And Munich crew, you guys did a great job. Really well done. Chuck, Alex, Patrick wherever he is, and our great makeup lady. Thanks a lot. Everybody back home. We're out. This is Fast Track Your Data. Go to IBMgo.com for all the replays. Youtube.com/SiliconANGLE for all the shows. TheCUBE.net is where we tell you where theCUBE's going to be. Go to wikibon.com for all the research. Thanks for watching everybody. This is Dave Vellante with Jim Kobielus. We're out.

Published Date : Jun 25 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by IBM. I mean they were you know just kind of ... I think the word you used last night was perfunctory. And a couple of things of importance to European customers, first and foremost GDPR. IBM knows how to throw a party. I mean terms of what you learn. seen in the past, where you could just sort of fluff it off. I mean the average person is not buzzing about GDPR, but it's hugely important. I don't see a lot of the deep learning stuff quite yet. And there's a growing range of open source deep learning toolkits beyond you know TensorFlow, of Hadoop is that the guys are going to make the money in this big data business of the And the ecosystem as it develops somebody's going to clean up. Let's talk about the research that you're working on. the pipelines and the tools that allow you to do that. Who do you who impresses you in the developer community? all around the world, in terms of hackathons and developer days, you know meetups here Is it IBM sort of going after the core, trying to evolve that core you know constituency? They've got huge amounts of developers energized all around the world working on this platform. Likewise a big sequel makes perfect sense as the sequel front end to the HDP. You know educate us. The developer angle would supercharge the developer angle, and maybe make it more relevant Hortonworks is really deep on the governance of Hadoop. I mean it's you know north of ... They blue-wash the companies and they generally do very well with acquisitions. I wouldn't say that Hortonworks, in terms of monetization potential, would match say I mean SPSS has been an extraordinarily successful ... Well the day IBM acquired SPSS they tripled the license fees. now in big data in the cloud is eclipsing Silicon Valley, in terms of where you know Well Google still hanging in there. Really a pleasure working with you today. And Munich crew, you guys did a great job.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Kate SilvertonPERSON

0.99+

Jim KobielusPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

JimPERSON

0.99+

Hilary MasonPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

AppleORGANIZATION

0.99+

EuropeLOCATION

0.99+

PatrickPERSON

0.99+

Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

GermanyLOCATION

0.99+

HortonworksORGANIZATION

0.99+

Y2KORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

ChuckPERSON

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

MunichLOCATION

0.99+

EnglandLOCATION

0.99+

Rob ThomasPERSON

0.99+

second trackQUANTITY

0.99+

SiriTITLE

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

21st centuryDATE

0.99+

three trackQUANTITY

0.99+

RobPERSON

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

4%QUANTITY

0.99+

Mena ScoyalPERSON

0.99+

AlexPERSON

0.99+

Whole FoodsORGANIZATION

0.99+

EachQUANTITY

0.99+

CloudantORGANIZATION

0.99+

Day 1 Wrap Up | AWS Public Sector Summit 2017


 

>> Narrator: Live from Washington DC, it's theCube, covering AWS Public Sector Summit 2017. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services and its partner Ecosystem. >> Welcome back here to Washington, D.C. You're watching Cube Live here at Silicon Angle T.V. The flagship broadcast of Silicon Angle. We are at AWS Public Sector Summit 2017 wrapping up day one coverage here in the Walter Washington Convention Center. Along with John Furrier, we are now joined by our esteemed colleague Jeff Frick who's been alongside all day handling all the machinations behind the scenes. >> Behind the scenes, John. >> John: Doing an admirable job of that, Jeff. >> So what do you think, our first ever visit to your town. >> John: I love it, I love it. >> I sense something tableau at the Opry. The Opry's the other big convention center, here, or Graceland. >> International Harbor. >> It's the same company. >> National harbor, MGM. >> You're a D.C. guy. >> Gaylord. >> Gaylord, thank you. >> What's the connection? So we going to get some tickets for the Nationals game? >> We got Nats game tonight, Strasburg pitched last night, did not pitch well, but who knows? Maybe we'll get Gio tonight. >> Well the action certainly Amazon Web Services >> Yeah let's talk about what we have going on here today, Jeff. >> Well, I mean, we interviewed, you and I did some great interviews. Intel came on, which is obviously Bellwether in the tech business. Jeff, former Intel employee knows what it's like to march to the cadence of Moore's law and Intel is continuing to do well in platinum sponsor or diamond sponsor here at the event. Look it, the chips are getting smarter and smarter, security at the Silicon, powering 5G, a networks transmission, a lot of the plumbing that's going on in cloud and in cars and devices and companies, it's going to all be connected. So it's a connected world we're living in and Intel's going to be a key part of that so they're highly interested and motivated by all the people that are popping up in the cloud. >> We were just talking and Jeff, I know, you're able to listen on the last interview that we did, but a point that you made, that, you know, a point that you raised, about four years ago, when the CIA deal came down and AWS is ON one side and IBM's on the other, and AWS wins that battle. You called it the shot heard round the cloud. And that, now four years later, has turned out to be a hugely pivotal moment. >> Yeah, I mean this is like moments in time history here, again, documenting it on the Cube for the first time. I don't think anything was written about this I'll say it since we're going to be analyzing it. The shot heard around the cloud was 2013 when AWS public sector under Teresa Carlton's team and her leadership, beat IBM for the Central Intelligence Agency, CIA, contract. Guaranteed lots of spec for IBM. Amazon comes out of the woodwork and wins it. And they won it because essentially the sales motion and the power of IBM had this thing lopped in. But at that time the marketplace was booming with what we call Shadow IT, where you could put your credit card down and go into Amazon cloud and get some instants. What happened was someone actually cut a little prototype, showed their boss, and they said, "I like that better than that, let's do a bake-off." So what happened was at the last minute, new opportunity comes in and then they do what they call a bake-off. Bake-offs and RAPs come in and they won. Went to court and the judge in the ruling actually said Amazon has a better product. So they ruled in favor of Amazon Web Services. That was what I called the shot heard around the cloud. Since that point on, the cloud has become more legitimate every single day for not only startups, enterprises, as well as now public sector. So shot heard around the cloud fast forward to today, this show's on a trajectory to take on the pace of re:Invent, which as their core Amazon Web Services show, then of course which is why we're here chronicalizing this moment in history. This is where we believe, Jeff you and I talked about this, and Dave Alante and I talked about the research team, this is where the influction point kicks up. This is a new growth pillar unpredicted by Wall Street, new growth predictor for revenue for Amazon, they're already a cash machine. They're already looking like a hockey stick this way. You add on public sector, it's going to be phenomenal. So, a lot of people are seeing it but this is just growing like a weed. >> Jeff, follow up on that. >> I was going to say, the two mega trends, John, that we've talked about time and time again, and Teresa Carlson and team have done a terrific job here in the public sector, but I always go back to the James, Tuesday night in the James Hamilton at re:Invent, and if you've never gone you got to go, and he talks about just all these big iron infrastructure investments that Amazon continues to make because they have such scale behind them. Whether it's in chips, whether it's in networking, whether it's in new fibers that they're running across the oceans. They can invest so much money to the benefit of their customers, whether it be security, you know, in all the areas of compute, that is fascinating to me. The other thing we always hear about, about cloud, right, is at some point, it's cheaper to own rather than rent. We just keep coming back to Netflix, like at nighttime, I think Netflix owns whatever the number, 45 percent of all internet traffic in the evening is Netflix, whatever the number is. They're still on Amazon. So, it's not necessarily better to rent than buy. You have to know what you're doing and we were at another show the other day, it was Gannet, the newspaper company. When they're using a lot of servers, they use hundreds, but he said there are sometimes, using AWS, that they actually turn all the servers off. You cannot do that in a standard infrastructure world. You can't turn everything off and then on. Which again, you got to manage it. You don't want the expensive bill. But to me, being able to leverage such scale to the benefit of every customer whether it's Netflix or a startup, it's pretty tough. >> And this is the secret, and this is something again, shared with the Cube audience, here, is not new to us, but we're going to re-amplify it because the people make a mistake with the cloud, it's in one area, they don't match the business model to their variable cost expenses. If you get into the cloud business, and you can actually ratchet your revenue coming in and then manage that cost delta redline, blackline, know where those lines are, as long as you're in the black, and revenue, and you then have the cost variable step up with your revenue, that is the magical formula. It's not that hard, it's back of an envelope. >> Right, right. >> Red line cost, black line revenue. >> The other great story, it was from summit, actually, in San Francisco earlier this year, at they keynote, they had Nextdoor, everybody knows Nextdoor it's the social media for your mom, my mom. They love it, right, people are losing dogs, and looking for a plumber, but the guy talked from about Nextdoor. >> John: Don't knock Nextdoor. >> I don't knock Nextdoor, the Nextdoor CEO gets up and he said, well, I laugh because the Nextdoor guy's mom didn't know what he did until he did Nextdoor. Anyway, he said, you know, we have the entire production system for Nextdoor. And then we would build production plus one on a completely separate group of hardwares inside of Amazon. When that was tested out and ready to run, guess what, we just turn off the first one. You can't, you can't, you can't do that in an owned infrastructure world. You can't build N and N plus one and N plus two and turn off N, you just can't do that. >> Well, the Fugue CEO, Josh, everyone should check out on Youtube.com/siliconangle, he was awesome. He basically saw a throwaway infrastructure mindset to your point about Nextdoor. You build it up and then you bring your new stuff in, you digitally throw it away. >> Right, right. >> That's the future. And this is the business model aspect. And public sector, we were joking, look it, let's just be honest with ourselves, it is a glacier antiquated old systems, people trying hard, you know, government servants, you know, that, employees of the government, not appointees, they don't have a lot of budget and they're always under scrutiny for cost. So the cost benefits always there and they have old systems. So they want new systems. So the demand is there. The question is, can they pull it off. >> So, talk about the government mindset or the shift. We've heard a little bit about that today. About how, to the point that you just made there, John, that you know, very reluctant, some foot-dragging going on, that's historical, that's what happens. But now, maybe the CIA deal, whatever it was, we hit that tipping point, and all the sudden, the minds are opening, and some people are embracing, or being more engaging, with new mousetraps, with better ways to do things. >> We've got the speakers coming on here, so we should wrap it up real quick. Final thoughts, from Day One. >> I was just going to say that the other thing is that before there was so much fat, in not only government in general, but in infrastructure purchasing, 'cause you had to, you better not run out of hardware at Q3 when you're running the numbers. So everything was so over provision, so much expense and over provisioning. With Amazon you don't need to over provision. You can tap it when you need it and turn it off so there's a huge amount of budget that should actually be released. >> I want to ask you guys, we'll wrap up here, final, since you're emceeing, final thoughts. What is your impression of day one? I'll start here and you guys can have time to think of an answer. My takeaway for public sector is Teresa Carlson has risen up as a prime executive for Amazon Web Services. She went from knocking doors eight years ago to full on blown growth strategy for Amazon. And it's very clear, they're not there yet. They only have 10,000 people here, so the conference isn't that massive. But it's on its way to becoming massive. Here's their issue. They have to start getting the cadence of re:Invent launches into the public sector. And that's the big story here. They are quickly shortening the cycles between what they launch at Amazon re:Invent and what they roll out of the public sector. The question is how fast can they do that? And that's what we're going to be watching. And then the customer behaviors starting to procure. So greenlight for Amazon. But they got to get those release cycles. Stuff gets released at Amazon re:Invent, they got to roll them with government, shorten that down to almost zero, they'll win. >> Yeah, my just quick impression is, I like to look at the booth action, because we've all had booth duty, right. What's going on in the booths? Did the people that paid for a booth here feel like they got their money's worth? And the traffic in the booths has been good, they've been three deep, four deep. So the people that are here are curious they're interested, they're spending time going booth to booth to booth, and that's a very good sign. >> This is a learning conference. Alright your thoughts. >> I would say, the only thing that is, I wouldn't say it's a red light by any means, but it's like a caution light, it's about budgets, you know, when you run government, you're always, you are vulnerable to somebody else's budget decision. I'm, you know, whether it's Congress, whether it's a city council, whether it's a state legislation, whatever it is, that's always just kind of a, a little hangup you have to deal with because you might have the best mousetrap in the world, but if somebody says nah, you can't write that check this year, maybe next year. We're going to put our money somewhere else. That's the only thing. >> I got my Trump joke in, I don't know if you heard that, but my Trump joke is, I'll say it at the end, there's a lot of data lakes in D.C., and they've turned into data swamps. So Amazon's here to drain the data swamp. >> Jeff: He got it in. He's been practicing that all week. >> I've heard it three times, are you kidding? Funny every time. >> Well you know our Cube, you know we talk about data swamps. I hate the word data lake, as everyone knows, I just hate that word, it's just not. >> Well, there is value in that swamp. >> Hated the word data lake. >> For Jeff Rick, John Furrier, I'm John Walsh. Thank you for joining us here at the AWS Public Sector Summit 2017. Back tomorrow with more coverage, live here on the Cube.

Published Date : Jun 13 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Amazon Web Services in the Walter Washington Convention Center. I love it. The Opry's the other big convention center, here, We got Nats game tonight, Strasburg pitched last night, Yeah let's talk about what we have and companies, it's going to all be connected. and IBM's on the other, and AWS wins that battle. So shot heard around the cloud fast forward to today, in all the areas of compute, that is fascinating to me. and you can actually ratchet your revenue coming in it's the social media for your mom, my mom. I laugh because the Nextdoor guy's mom didn't know You build it up and then you bring your new stuff in, So the cost benefits always there and they have old systems. and all the sudden, the minds are opening, We've got the speakers coming on here, that the other thing is that before there was so much fat, And that's the big story here. So the people that are here are curious they're interested, This is a learning conference. That's the only thing. I'll say it at the end, there's a lot of data lakes in D.C., He's been practicing that all week. I've heard it three times, are you kidding? I hate the word data lake, as everyone knows, at the AWS Public Sector Summit 2017.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
JeffPERSON

0.99+

Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

IBMORGANIZATION

0.99+

Dave AlantePERSON

0.99+

Amazon Web ServicesORGANIZATION

0.99+

Jeff RickPERSON

0.99+

NextdoorORGANIZATION

0.99+

AWSORGANIZATION

0.99+

CIAORGANIZATION

0.99+

2013DATE

0.99+

JoshPERSON

0.99+

Teresa CarlsonPERSON

0.99+

Central Intelligence AgencyORGANIZATION

0.99+

TrumpPERSON

0.99+

John WalshPERSON

0.99+

NetflixORGANIZATION

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

GannetORGANIZATION

0.99+

San FranciscoLOCATION

0.99+

next yearDATE

0.99+

Teresa CarltonPERSON

0.99+

Washington, D.C.LOCATION

0.99+

CongressORGANIZATION

0.99+

D.C.LOCATION

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.99+

45 percentQUANTITY

0.99+

hundredsQUANTITY

0.99+

twoQUANTITY

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

Tuesday nightDATE

0.99+

MGMORGANIZATION

0.99+

eight years agoDATE

0.99+

10,000 peopleQUANTITY

0.99+

three timesQUANTITY

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

Walter Washington Convention CenterLOCATION

0.99+

four years laterDATE

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

this yearDATE

0.99+

last nightDATE

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

tonightDATE

0.99+

Washington DCLOCATION

0.98+

earlier this yearDATE

0.98+

MoorePERSON

0.98+

GracelandLOCATION

0.97+

day oneQUANTITY

0.97+

Susan Blocher, HPE - HPE Discover 2017


 

>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas, it's the Cube, covering HPE Discover 2017. Brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (techno music) >> Okay, welcome back everyone. We are here live in Las Vegas for the Cube's exclusive three-day coverage, we're on day two of HPE, Hewlett Packard Enterprise Discover 2017. I'm John Furrier, my cohost Dave Vellante. Our next guest is Susan Blocher, Vice President of Marketing, Data Center Infrastructure Group, part of Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Welcome back to the Cube, great to see you. >> Great to see you both again. >> So a lot of great stuff, so I want to just going to, a lot of buzz, Gen-10, a lot of new capabilities. Let's get right into it. Hard news, what's the update? What's going down at the show? >> We made the magic happen for this discoverer. It's just really exciting. So, hard news, we really focused on three areas for our customers: new levels of agility across their hybrid IT infrastructure, which means automation, better performance enhancements, taking things that used to be very manual and making them run sort of seamlessly, number one. Number two, security, and we're talking breakthrough security. So this is where we've been able to leverage some unique opportunities like the fact that we build our own silicane to put a silicane root of trust, or an immutable fingerprint, right into our silicane that can never be changed. That fingerprint will not let infected firmware startup. No matter, you know, as long as the firmware is the right firmware, it'll boot up seamlessly. If it's in any way been compromised you will, it will not let that server boot up. Super secure infrastructure. Last but not least, our customers were telling us economic control. We need economic control. We need cloud-like economics. We need pay-as-you-go. We need the ability to get capacity on demand. Those are the things that we really innovated on for this year. >> One of the things that's coming out, we had Bob Moran on the security thing. >> Yeah. >> And James Morrison >> Yes. >> I want to call him Jim Morrison >> Oh, exciting. >> I used to be >> I know. >> a big Doors fan. >> Yeah. >> I respect his name, I'm sure he gets that all the time. >> Yeah. The security on the silicane >> Yeah. >> is interesting to me because now you're seeing things like block changes, immutable environments wherevpeople have this trust relationship. That really hits the ransomeware side of things really in a big way. >> Susan: Yes. >> What else is that hitting? That is, to me, the big news, is that, is the security at the server-level because there's no perimeter anymore in this cloud-like environment, so this is kind of a cool way, explain more, just take minute to talk about the security piece because I think to me that's game-changer. >> It's super fascinating, and you know, I'm quoting somebody else, so I'm blatantly stealing somebody's line, but I was reading an article where somebody said firmware is a cesspool of Trojan horse opportunity for cyber attackers, and that took me aback because I was like, Boy, those are some strong words there, but really with all of the investment that companies have made over the years in data security, application security, network security, no one was focusing on the servers, and frankly, there's a million lines of code, and I'm sure Bob said that, there's a million lines of code booting up to get your servers up and running that no one has protected up until now. And so, we recognize about two years ago, that this was a huge threat, and increasing everyday, and boy, two years later, we're in the nick of time, to give customers really the peaace of mind of that security. >> One of the things that Wikibon just put out in terms of reports on research that I find fascinating that ties into this trend that I want to get your reaction on is, I think they're the only research firm that put this out actually, is they actually size the true private cloud market at about 260 billion, and that's not including the hybrid piece. That means, on-prem, cloud-like capabilities for on-premise data centers, which means, hey, that's not really going away, so it points to that narrative that, oh, data centers are moving to the cloud, so that's kind of probably not going to happen any time soon, but the cloud-like capabilities are there. But one of the interesting stats is that, is billions of dollars in cost-shift from labor, to hire differentiated, higher yield, or differentiated stuff inside the organization. So IT's not getting smaller, it's getting changing. >> Susan: That's right. >> So, how are you guys taking the Gen-10 and other things, and helping customers abstract away those tasks? >> Yeah, exactly. So look, all of our customers are really doing hybrid IT now, and so they're doing some things on-premise, they're doing some things off-premise, and frankly, it makes sense. But there's a tremendous amount of compromises that they have to make on both sides of the coin, and so what we've been talking about, a new compute experience, and that's really what we mean. It's not saying that you should have everything on-premise, or that you should move everything to the cloud. It's really saying, how do we give you the best end to end experience across agility, security, and economic control, so that the trade-offs that you're making, are not trade-offs on the pros or cons of those side loads of IT, but really looking at it from a what kind of business outcomes do I need to drive, and that's how I make my decisions. >> So, if you go back to around 2010, John, we were talking the Cube about a couple of observations. And it sort of coincided with the ascendancy of the public cloud. We said that the hyper-scale guys will spend time, engineering time, to save money, and then automate stuff, but the Enterprise guys, they'll spend money to save time. They don't have all of those engineering resources and we talked about that for a while, and it kind of got old and sort of boring. Fast-forward to 2017, and that's exactly what happened is vendors have put in a lot of effort to create cloud-like capabilities, and to John's point, is you're seeing a shift in staffing away from undifferentiated stuff, so talk about what that means for the data center infrastructure group, sort of how you position and how you talk to customers and message them about your role and how you add value. >> Yeah, absolutely. So look, first of all, we don't talk about just data center infrastructure. I think that's really where it starts because frankly, customers are talking about their data, they're talking about their applications, they're talking about how to bring intelligence to their hybrid IT experience, and so what we're talking to them about, is really how do we bring that together for them? We're talking about software-defined intelligence, how we're leveraging HPE One View to automate the deployment of applications across what could be a complex apology, but doing it absolutely in an automated seamless way. We're talking about how we're taking iLo and building the security in, but we're also doing things like intelligence system tuning where we're partnering with Intel and really figuring out how to take what is the Intel turbo-boost mode, from their processors, and make it even better. And so a lot of applications can't take advantage of the turbo-boost mode because there's a bit of when you hit that high frequency, you get a little bit of jitter, and that jitter creates latency, and so a lot of applications like core banking, video streaming, high frequency trading, they can't use turbo-mode because of that jitter that creates latency. We've been able to figure out, partnering with Intel, how to dampen a little bit of that speed, but still get turbo-mood and eliminate that jitter, so no latency. For the first time, these applications have been able to take advantage of turbo-mode. And what we figured out is even though we dampened it a little bit, they actually perform better with that little bit of dampening than they would've if we had shot them up with full turbo mode, right? So super exciting innovations with that. >> Sounds like Pied Piper. (laughter) >> But this is the kind of innovation that's going on in the systems world, and another observation we've seen on the Cube is, we go to a lot of events, is that systems is back. There's kind of an under current going on in the industry where hardware and operating systems folks are now part of big transformations, whether it's hyper-scale or in-service providor and Enterprise, so how are you guys looking at the compute differently if the notion of a server is shifting, and they're maybe consuming IT differently, where the channel partner might become a provider, and all these things are going on, how do you guys look at this new style of computer, our Meg says the changing landscape of compute. >> The changing landscape. It's all about really understanding our customers, and who they are, and how we can look at their unique needs and then segment our value and our portfolio toward them, so you talked about hyper-scale users, like service providers, cloud service providers, small and medium sized businesses, Enterprise customers, Telco environments, high-performance computing, super computing. What we realize is that one size does not fit all, and that's really what it comes down to, and that's one of the trade-offs of the public cloud environment, there's lots of good things about public cloud, but one of the trade-offs is it's kind of commodity hardware and one size fits all, but if you're trying to do any kind of mission critical applications, like I said, high frequency trading, you need super computing capabilities, you need deep analytics, machine-learning, whatever the case might be, it's not... You really need to specialize the infrastructure, and HPE is right there working with our customers regardless of their needs and their segments, we've got the solutions that will help them do that. >> So one of the things I'm inferring from some of your comments, I want to ask you about marketing. I always struggle with marketing. (laughter) You're shifting the message from product, product, product to business impact. >> Susan: Yes! >> Okay, that's clear. What else is working in marketing these days? It's never one silver bullet, but there's belly to belly, there's events like this, there's obviously old-school email marketing, there's social media. What are you finding as a marketing problem? >> We talk a lot about digital transformation for our customers, but digital transformation has come to marketing, so that's the biggest thing. We have made a huge shift at Hewlett Packard Enterprise in digital marketing. So everything that we're doing, even an event like this, which is physical, but it used to be kind of a one-off. We do all this prep, and then the week would go by, and it would disappear, and that would be the end of it. We're learning to build snackable content assets that have life after life after life, we're really embracing the social media, we've built a whole new digital marketing platform, we've shifted from what I would call traditional demand generation into really reaching our customers through digital marketing in every country globally. Huge, amazing metamorphosis, and frankly, with the announcement of the new HPE compute experience, and the Gen-10 platform, and the world's most secure industry-standard servers, it is the perfect timing of bringing all of this incredible innovation of technology to market at the same time that we're innovating around marketing, so the next 12 months, it's going to be super exciting. >> Eating your own innovations, if it were. >> That's right, that's right. >> Congratulations on the Gen-10 launch, and all the great goodness you guys got going on the security thing, a big deal. >> A big deal. >> Looking forward to following up on that further after the show, to keep it going. Certainly, there's digital aspects here in the Cube will be available on Youtube.com, slash and the name of course, the Cube Gems and highlights, all available. Thanks so much for joining us on the Cube, really appreciate it, more live coverage from HP Discover 2017. After this short break, stay with us. I'm John Furrier with my co-host Dave Vellante. We'll be right back. (techno music)

Published Date : Jun 7 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. for the Cube's exclusive three-day coverage, What's going down at the show? We need the ability to get capacity on demand. One of the things that's coming out, we had Bob Moran all the time. The security on the silicane That really hits the ransomeware side of things is the security at the server-level that companies have made over the years and that's not including the hybrid piece. so that the trade-offs that you're making, We said that the hyper-scale guys and building the security in, Sounds like Pied Piper. that's going on in the systems world, and that's one of the trade-offs So one of the things I'm inferring from some but there's belly to belly, so the next 12 months, it's going to be super exciting. and all the great goodness you guys got going on after the show, to keep it going.

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Susan BlocherPERSON

0.99+

Jim MorrisonPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

SusanPERSON

0.99+

Hewlett Packard EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.99+

James MorrisonPERSON

0.99+

BobPERSON

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

Bob MoranPERSON

0.99+

2017DATE

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

three-dayQUANTITY

0.99+

first timeQUANTITY

0.99+

billions of dollarsQUANTITY

0.99+

two years laterDATE

0.99+

WikibonORGANIZATION

0.99+

IntelORGANIZATION

0.98+

both sidesQUANTITY

0.98+

a million linesQUANTITY

0.98+

about 260 billionQUANTITY

0.97+

oneQUANTITY

0.97+

OneQUANTITY

0.96+

three areasQUANTITY

0.96+

one sizeQUANTITY

0.95+

bothQUANTITY

0.95+

one silver bulletQUANTITY

0.95+

CubeCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.95+

MegPERSON

0.94+

this yearDATE

0.94+

day twoQUANTITY

0.94+

Gen-10OTHER

0.93+

iLoTITLE

0.93+

HPEORGANIZATION

0.93+

2010DATE

0.83+

Pied PiperPERSON

0.81+

Data Center Infrastructure GroupORGANIZATION

0.79+

about two years agoDATE

0.77+

Packard Enterprise Discover 2017EVENT

0.77+

next 12 monthsDATE

0.75+

HewlettORGANIZATION

0.74+

Number twoQUANTITY

0.73+

Youtube.comORGANIZATION

0.72+

Gen-10QUANTITY

0.71+

TelcoORGANIZATION

0.69+

HPEEVENT

0.68+

VicePERSON

0.65+

One ViewCOMMERCIAL_ITEM

0.62+

HPORGANIZATION

0.62+

HPE Discover 2017EVENT

0.61+

HPETITLE

0.59+

DoorsORGANIZATION

0.57+

coupleQUANTITY

0.5+

Discover 2017EVENT

0.42+

Day One Wrap Up - HPE Discover 2017


 

>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas it's The Cube covering HPE Discover 2017 brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. (electronic music) >> Welcome back everyone, we're live here in Las Vegas for HPE, Hewlett Packard Enterprise, Discover 2017 SiliconAngle Media's program The Cube where we go out to the events and extract the signal from the noise. I'm John Furrier, my co-host Dave Vellante, my Co-CEO and Co-Founder SiliconAngle Media which is part of siliconangle.com, The Cube, SiliconAngle.tv, thecube.net, and wikibon.com. Go to wikibon.com and seek out all the great research, and a lot of the stuff they're talking about here at HPE Discover has a lot to do with what's happening at Wikibon and around big data and IoT. Dave, summary of day one wrap-up, kind of our take if you will on HPE's messaging, what they're showing and the debate. We were at Dell EMC World. We heard Michael Dell and his team say bigger is better. HP is saying agile, nimble, but they've got a confederation, federation, all these little kind of HP companies. It's still a conglomerate. It's not small, as you said in our opening. Meg's keynote today was all about the future of computing in a new way, if you will, data, IoT center of it. Your thoughts and analysis of day one keynote, our guests, your thoughts. >> John, I opened up this morning's segment saying that five years ago we talked on The Cube about, and I made the statement, HP's got to shrink to grow. The other thing I said about HP, now HPE, was it's got to get back to its roots of invent, and it has not gotten back to those roots, and now it is reinventing itself, and it's opportunity to get back to its roots of invention is through a partner ecosystem. That's very clear, kind of point number one. The second point I want to make is that these transformations that HPE and companies have gone through, I mean I've never seen anything this large, splitting a company up of 100 billion dollar company, changing all the IT systems, doing all these spin merges, these are not trivial exercises. So when Meg says we're sort of at the end of that transformation, that five year process, in many respects they've now got to create a new transformation. They finally got this, they have this smaller company that's more focused, and they've really got to still sharpen the edges on that sword in my opinion. The software business is still part of HPE, so that's got to happen. The cash coming in from the CSC spin-merge still has to come in, so the balance sheet is still being restructured. But essentially the message that you're hearing from HP is we're going to help you keep the lights on. We're going to make hybrid IT simple which is a good sort of tagline, but it's a very, again, nontrivial thing to do. We've got this new partner ethos, and we've got this fourth piece which is a moonshot on IoT, and that's our big growth opportunity, and we're going to put all our muscle behind that. I like the strategy. I mean if you're going to go smaller and more focused, you've got to have some kind of moonshot like that. You've got to have a partner ecosystem as they've described, but as I say, there's still some more work to be done. They're still shaking off the embers of the exit of the cloud business, trying to reshape that whole thing, so there's, as I say, more work to be done. >> You know it's interesting, good points, I agree 100%. I would add that my observation and what I came into HPE looking at was what will leadership, and specifically Meg Whitman and Antonio Neri, mainly Meg Whitman, and the team articulate to the customers, because they've been getting pounded in the press on financial performance, the journey. I mean if I'm Meg Whitman, I got to be saying hey, enough with the backbiting on, the five-year journey and trying to peg me to a milestone, because the market's changing. You go back five years and say oh, it's going to be a five year journey, let's say Meg Whitman says that. What that really means is that's just kind of an estimate, based on her opinion execute but what I think, well, she mighta seen but what happened was: the cloud just came in and completely decimated the landscape relative to disruption opportunity so a five-year journey, pegged at that time, becomes essentially maybe longer. And so they're executing a turbulent marketplace that's good for them but it could be wind at their back too. So I think they had to come out and talk to their customers. The customers need to hear from HP, and saying, "Look, we got your back. "We're going to be delivering. "We understand the transformation. "We understand what's going on." They've been in the IT consumption business, serving customers in IT. They're a big company. They got to calm the customers down and give them confidence. So to me, I saw confidence in the simplicity message, hybrid IT message, and the IoT with the headroom. I didn't see any game-changing, futuristic, vapor. I didn't see a lot of AI washing, I didn't see a lot of machine learning, which is, I think we're seeing the trend. But they didn't lead with that. They led with the meat and potatoes of HP: Storage, talking about the acquisitions: Simplicity.. >> Dave: Services.. >> Nimble, the messaging with partners, I thought that's very much a meat-and-potatoes, it wasn't like a lights-out keynote by Meg Whitman in the sense of standing ovation on, yeah rah-rah. But it was meat-and-potatoes, aggressive, assertive, "we're here for the long haul" and I thought that was positive. >> I think the partner-friendly ethos is really, really important, and you see it around the show, I mean look at, Veeam is a Platinum Sponsor, right? That never would've happened two years ago because of HP Protector, HP's backup software. Never would've happened before. You see Fortunet out in the show, basically a competitor with HP, HP's security business. And then this whole new partnership around the large SI's, right, I mean that's a big deal. You were saying "India, SI's." The CEO of Wipro, standing up today, I thought he was one of the more impressive parts of the keynote. So, a much more aggressive posture with partnerships, a much cleaner story for partners. Yesterday, the partner conference got pretty high marks. People, I think, are fairly excited about that, because HP has got enough muscle to put resources in, and John you know. What's your take on the whole channel and partnership thing? I mean, you lived that for a decade. >> Well, I mean, I think the channel thing is a great opportunity for them. It's about making money together and I think that's going to be a key thing. My thoughts, just from trying to read the tea leaves, and I'm going to put this out there, it's, I would say, not half-baked but my observation from today, and in the interviews, things came together for me around something that I was thinking about but I could see it now with a little bit of a clarity, and that is I think we're going to see a hardware renaissance. And what I mean by that is, I think the message of computing is changing. We've been predicting, with Open Compute, that we've been covering, which is an open source project, where Facebook and now others are donating reference and imitations after which, Antonio Neri was supporting that project. It's not a lot of funding, there's a lot of open source projects going on. There's a lot of disruption happening. It's almost just like, small little, not real well-reported marketplace. Not a lot of money's being made yet, cuz there's some new things happening. I think, what's clear to me today is that a new business model of hardware is coming. And I think HP, if smart, could change their business model. Instead of being a hardware box supplier, which they know is a declining market, to a TAM, a Total Addressable Market, true private cloud, of $260 billion, and be a supplier of hardware business model, rather than hardware product, where they bring their systems expertise in, use open source, bring the stuff out of HP Labs, and not try to be hardcore about productising it in a hardcore way, meaning another SKU. I think they got to have some core products, but the growth, I think's going to come from a hardware renaissance, where a new developer's going to come out of hardware, you're going to start to see hardware being in the game. Just last week at the Recode Conference, you had Steve Ballmer with Kara Swisher, saying "We should have got in the hardware business a long time ago. Everyone's making their own phones," in reference to the consumer market. So, I think the enterprise market, you're going to see real opportunity around service providers and enterprises, essentially getting the best of what Amazon and Google does, which is build their own boxes, in a new hardware development way. That, to me, is absolutely clear and I think that's going to open up, essentially, that long tail of compute. Cloud-like, true private cloud, and hybrid. And I think if HP's smart, they should jump on that and double down on that trend. >> So, the things I'm looking for between, say now and the next Discover in Madrid in December. The post-spin-merge balance sheet. Let's take a look at that, 'cause I think it's going to look a lot better. And that's going to cause people to go "Whoa, look at that, now HP's got even more leverage "to go out and do deals." The second is, when does IoT actually become a meaningful and measurable component of HPE's business? Talking a lot about it, building up the ecosystem, talking about some use cases, a lot of blue-sky types of things, but not a lot of hardcore, concrete examples at the customer level. So when does that become a meaningful revenue generator? And then, I think from credibility's standpoint, margins. Meg said, "This is it, margins have bottomed. "They're going to bounce off the bottom "and grow from here." We've got to see that, and I think the keys are services, really executing on the services side, leveraging their acquisitions, let's see what they can do with, I mean Aruba looks good, Nimble, SimpliVity. Can they turn those into billion dollar businesses like they did with 3Par? And then the partnerships, I don't expect any head-fakes, you remember HP used to always head-fake the channel and head-fake the partnerships. I don't expect that now. >> They've never had fake partners. Partners would call them out on the carpet on that. I think they have been groping with the partners, and hoping to have a flagship. >> Dave: I dunno, I mean.. >> I don't think they've, now you're trying to be critical of HP, but they've never had fake partners. >> When they, say head-fake. They would buy a company like EDS, and their partners Ecosystem would go "Whoa, wait a minute, I'm not sure "I want to partner with these guys." >> I'd debate that with you, but I think HP's always had great partnerships. I think where they've misfired, if you want to be critical, is that they mismatched where the growth was, with throwing an outsource for instance, that's a complete mismatch to where the growth is. Now, to your point about IoT, I think that's their big opportunity because IoT is a beachhead setup. I think it's a great opportunity as a flagship message to take the portfolio of HP into a partner-friendly world that's going beyond swim lanes, this is like the Grand Canyon, the Panama Canal. And none of them more than swim lanes. So I think having the portfolio with more M&A activity, with Aruba and some of the hardware they have, they can go in and get the beachhead in IoT and use that as a driver, a flagship with their partnerships to start engaging customers and holding the ground. And then, moving the services in, that could hold them for a good couple years. And then, as the margins shift from the declining hardware business, I think that's an opportunity, and we're going to look at that. >> And the other big opportunity, beyond IoT, is this intercloud management. Will HP participate in earnest in building up some software capabilities to manage cross-cloud? On-prem, off-prem, everything in between, Sass, et cetera. You don't hear anything about that now. So is that part of the HPE strategy? Will it use its new balance sheet to go after some of those emerging software companies, and rebuild its software business? >> Well, we always will analyze. We've got all day tomorrow. We've got some great guests. But Dave, Information Technology, known as IT, is not going away. It's changing, certainly, for sure. Information and technology's really going to be a great opportunity for HP. If they stick in their old ways, they'll be dead. If they can transform over themselves, I think it's a winner. Of course we've got live coverage, three days, tomorrow and Thursday This is theCUBE. Go to SiliconAngle.com, check out all the latest reporting and journalism. Go to Wikibon.com for all the great research. The best research is behind a subscription. You got to pay for that, I would definitely do that. The true private cloud report you guys did, I thought was killer, really that's groundbreaking, and IoT stuff's fantastic. Of course, go to SiliconAngle.tv to check out all the great stuff. And of course, go to CrowdChat.net, and we have a new CUBE 365 product coming out of the oven from SiliconAngle labs, lot of great stuff. Stay with us for more coverage tomorrow and check out YouTube.com/SiliconAngle for all the videos in replay. We'll be back tomorrow, stay with us. Have a great day. (electronic music)

Published Date : Jun 7 2017

SUMMARY :

brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. and a lot of the stuff they're talking about and I made the statement, HP's got to shrink to grow. I mean if I'm Meg Whitman, I got to be saying hey, Nimble, the messaging with partners, to put resources in, and John you know. and I think that's going to be a key thing. And that's going to cause people to go and hoping to have a flagship. I don't think they've, now you're trying to and their partners Ecosystem would go that's a complete mismatch to where the growth is. So is that part of the HPE strategy? Information and technology's really going to be

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Dave VellantePERSON

0.99+

Meg WhitmanPERSON

0.99+

JohnPERSON

0.99+

MegPERSON

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

DavePERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

John FurrierPERSON

0.99+

HPORGANIZATION

0.99+

Steve BallmerPERSON

0.99+

Kara SwisherPERSON

0.99+

Hewlett Packard EnterpriseORGANIZATION

0.99+

five yearQUANTITY

0.99+

five-yearQUANTITY

0.99+

HPEORGANIZATION

0.99+

SiliconAngle MediaORGANIZATION

0.99+

$260 billionQUANTITY

0.99+

FacebookORGANIZATION

0.99+

Antonio NeriPERSON

0.99+

100%QUANTITY

0.99+

DecemberDATE

0.99+

Panama CanalLOCATION

0.99+

last weekDATE

0.99+

Michael DellPERSON

0.99+

WiproORGANIZATION

0.99+

second pointQUANTITY

0.99+

EDSORGANIZATION

0.99+

SiliconAngleORGANIZATION

0.99+

five yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

Las VegasLOCATION

0.99+

Grand CanyonLOCATION

0.99+

MadridLOCATION

0.99+

fourth pieceQUANTITY

0.99+

3ParORGANIZATION

0.99+

todayDATE

0.99+

tomorrowDATE

0.99+

ThursdayDATE

0.99+

five years agoDATE

0.99+

EcosystemORGANIZATION

0.98+

secondQUANTITY

0.98+

YesterdayDATE

0.98+

HP LabsORGANIZATION

0.97+

day oneQUANTITY

0.97+

NimbleORGANIZATION

0.96+

two years agoDATE

0.96+

YouTube.com/SiliconAngleOTHER

0.95+

WikibonORGANIZATION

0.94+

2017DATE

0.93+

three daysQUANTITY

0.92+

thecube.netOTHER

0.92+

Recode ConferenceEVENT

0.91+

ArubaORGANIZATION

0.91+

oneQUANTITY

0.91+

wikibon.comOTHER

0.9+

100 billion dollarQUANTITY

0.9+

Discover 2017EVENT

0.89+

Show Wrap - Data Platforms 2017 - #DataPlatforms2017


 

>> Announcer: Live from the Wigwam in Phoenix, Arizona. It's theCUBE. Covering Data Platforms 2017. Brought to you by Kubo. >> Hey welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE along with George Gilbert from Wikibon. We've had a tremendous day here at DataPlatforms 2017 at the historic Wigwam Resort, just outside of Phoenix, Arizona. George, you've been to a lot of big data shows. What's your impression? >> I thought we're at the, we're sort of at the edge of what could be a real bridge to something new, which is, we've built big data systems for like out of traditional, as traditional software for deployment on traditional infrastructure. Even if you were going to put it in a virtual machine, it's still not a cloud. You're still dealing with server abstractions. But what's happening with Kubo is, they're saying, once you go to the cloud, whether it's Amazon, Azure, Google or Oracle, you're going to be dealing with services. Services are very different. It greatly simplifies the administrative experience, the developer experience, and more than that, they're focused on, they're focused on turning Kubo, the product on Kubo the service, so that they can automate the management of it. And we know that big data has been choking itself on complexity. Both admin and developer complexity. And they're doing something unique, both on sort of the big data platform management, but also data science operations. And their point, their contention, which we still have to do a little more homework on, is that the vendors who started with software on-prem, can't really make that change very easily without breaking what they've done on-prem. Cuz they have traditional perpetual license physical software as opposed to services, which is what is in the cloud. >> The question is, are people going to wait for them to figure it out. I talked to somebody in the hallway earlier this morning and we were talking about their move to put all their data into, it was S3, on their data lake. And he said, it's part of a much bigger transformational process that we're doing inside the company. And so, this move, from his cloud, public cloud viable, to tell me, give me a reason why it shouldn't go to the cloud, has really kicked in big time. And hear over and over and over that speed and agility, not just in deploying applications, but in operating as a company, is the key to success. And we hear over and over how many, how short the tenure is on the Fortune 500 now, compared to what it used to be. So if you're not speed and agile, which you pretty much have to use cloud, and software driven automated decision-making >> Yeah. >> that's powered by machine learning to eat. >> Those two things. >> A huge percentage of your transaction and decision-making, you're going to get smoked by the person that is. >> Let's let's sort of peel that back. I was talking to Monte Zweben who is the co-founder of Splice Machine, one of the most advance databases that sort of come out of nowhere over the last couple of years. And it's now, I think, in close beta on Amazon. He showed me, like a couple of screens for spinning it up and configuring it on Amazon. And he said, if I were doing that on-prem, he goes I needed Hadoop cluster with HBase. It would take me like four plus months. And that's an example of software versus services. >> Jeff: Right. >> And when you said, when you pointed out that, automated decision-making, powered by machine learning, that's the other part, which is these big data systems ultimately are in the service of creating machine learning models that will inform ever better decisions with ever greater speed and the key then is to plug those models into existing systems of record. >> Jeff: Right. Right. >> Because we're not going to, >> We're not going to to rip those out and rebuild them from scratch. >> Right. But as you just heard, you can pull the data out that you need, run it through a new age application. >> George: Yeah. >> And then feed it back into the old system. >> George: Yes. >> The other thing that came up, it was Oskar, I have to look him up, Oskar Austegard from Gannett was on one of the panels. We always talk about the flexibility to add capacity very easily in a cloud-based solution. But he talked about in the separation of storage and cloud, that they actually have times where they turn off all their compute. It's off. Off. >> And that was If you had to boil down the fundamental compatibility break between on-prem and in the cloud, the Kubo folks, both the CEO and CMO said, look, you cannot reconcile what's essentially server send, where the storage is attached to the compute node, the server. With cloud where you have storage separate from compute and allowing you to spin it down completely. He said those are just the fundamentally incompatible. >> Yeah, yeah. And also, Andretti, one of the founders in his talk, he talked about the big three trends, which we just kind of talked about, he summarized them right in serverless. This continual push towards smaller and smaller units >> George: Yeah. >> of store compute. And the increasing speed of networks is one, from virtual servers to just no servers, to just compute. The second one is automation, you've got to move to automation. >> George: Right. If you're not, you're going to get passed by your competitor that is. Or the competitor you that you don't even know that exists that's going to come out from over your shoulder. And the third one was the intelligence, right. There is a lot of intelligence that can be applied. And I think the other cusp that we're on, is this continuing crazy increase in compute horsepower. Which just keeps going. That the speed and the intelligence of these machines is growing at an exponential curve, not a linear curve. It's going to be bananas in the not too distance future. >> We're soaking up more and more that intelligence with machine learning. The training part of machine learning where the datasets to train a model are immense. Not only the dataset are large, but the amount of time to sort of chug through them to come up with the, just the right mix of variables and values for those variables. Or maybe even multiple models. So that we're going to see in the cloud. And that's going to chew up more and more cycles. Even as we have >> Jeff: Right. Right. >> specialized processors. >> Jeff: Right. But in the data ops world, in theory yes, but I don't have to wait to get it right. Right? I can get it 70% right. >> George: Yeah. >> Which is better than not right. >> George: Yeah. >> And I can continue to iterate over time. In that, I think was the the genius of dev-ops. To stop writing PRDs and MRDs. >> George: Yeah. >> And deliver something. And then listen and adjust. >> George: Yeah. >> And within the data ops world, it's the same thing. Don't try to figure it all out. Take the data you know, have some hypothesis. Build some models and iterate. That's really tough to compete with. >> George: Yeah. >> Fast, fast, fast iteration. >> We're doing actually a fair amount of research on that. On the Wikibon side. Which is, if you build, if you build an enterprise application that has, that is reinforced or informed by models in many different parts, in other words, you're modeling more and more digital entities within the business. >> Jeff: Right. >> Each of those has feedback loops. >> Jeff: Right. Right. >> And when you get the whole thing orchestrated and moving or learning in concert then you have essentially what Michael Porter many years ago called competitive advantage. Which is when each business process reinforces all the other business processes in service of a delivering a value proposition. And those models represent business processes and when they're learning and orchestrated all together, you have a, what Trump called a fined-tuned machine. >> I won't go there. >> Leaving out that it was Bigley and it was finely-tuned machine. >> Yeah, yeah. But the end of the day, if you're using resources and effort to improve an different resource and effort, you're getting a multiplier effect. >> Yes. >> And that's really the key part. Final thought as we go out of here. Are you excited about this? Do you see, they showed the picture the NASA headquarters with the big giant snowball truck loading up? Do you see more and more of this big enterprise data going into S3, going into Google Cloud, going into Microsoft Azure? >> You're asking-- >> Is this the solution for the data lake swamp issue that we've been talking about? >> You're asking the 64 dollar question. Which is, companies, we sensed a year ago at the at the Hortonworks DataWorks Summit in, was in June, down in San Jose last year. That was where we first got the sense that, people were sort of throwing in the towel on trying to build, large scale big data platforms on-prem. And what changes now is, are they now evaluating Hortonworks versus Cloudera versus MapR in the cloud or are they widening their consideration as Kubo suggests. Because now they want to look, not only at Cloud Native Hadoop, but they actually might want to look at Cloud Native Services that aren't necessarily related to Hadoop. >> Right. Right. And we know as a service wins. It's continue. PAS is a service. Software is a service. Time and time again, as a service either eats a lot of share from the incumbent or knocks the incumbent out. So, Hadoop as a service, regardless of your distro, via one of these types of companies on Amazon, it seems like it's got to win, right. It's going to win. >> Yeah but the difference is, so far, so far, the Clouderas and the MapRs and the Hortonworks of the world are more software than service when they're in the cloud. They don't hide all the knobs. You still need You still a highly trained admin to get them up-- >> But not if you buy it as a service, in theory, right. It's going to be packaged up by somebody else and they'll have your knobs all set. >> They're not designed yet that way. >> HD Insight >> Then, then, then, then, They better be careful cuz it might be a new, as a service distro, of the Hadoop system. >> My point, which is what this is. >> Okay, very good, we'll leave it at that. So George, thanks for spending the day with me. Good show as always. >> And I'll be in a better mood next time when you don't steal my candy bars. >> All right. He's George Goodwin. I'm Jeff Frick. You're watching theCUBE. We're at the historic 99 years young, Wigwam Resort, just outside of Phoenix, Arizona. DataPlatforms 2017. Thanks for watching. It's been a busy season. It'll continue to be a busy season. So keep it tuned. SiliconAngle.TV or YouTube.com/SiliconAngle. Thanks for watching.

Published Date : May 26 2017

SUMMARY :

Brought to you by Kubo. at the historic Wigwam Resort, is that the vendors who started with software on-prem, but in operating as a company, is the key to success. you're going to get smoked by the person that is. over the last couple of years. and the key then is to plug those models Jeff: Right. We're not going to to rip those out But as you just heard, We always talk about the flexibility to add capacity And that was And also, Andretti, one of the founders in his talk, And the increasing speed of networks is one, And the third one was the intelligence, right. but the amount of time to sort of chug through them Jeff: Right. But in the data ops world, in theory yes, And I can continue to iterate over time. And then listen and adjust. Take the data you know, have some hypothesis. On the Wikibon side. Jeff: Right. And when you get the whole thing orchestrated Leaving out that it was Bigley But the end of the day, if you're using resources And that's really the key part. You're asking the 64 dollar question. a lot of share from the incumbent and the Hortonworks of the world It's going to be packaged up by somebody else of the Hadoop system. which is what this is. So George, thanks for spending the day with me. And I'll be in a better mood next time We're at the historic 99 years young, Wigwam Resort,

SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :

ENTITIES

EntityCategoryConfidence
Jeff FrickPERSON

0.99+

JeffPERSON

0.99+

GeorgePERSON

0.99+

George GoodwinPERSON

0.99+

George GilbertPERSON

0.99+

Michael PorterPERSON

0.99+

AndrettiPERSON

0.99+

San JoseLOCATION

0.99+

AmazonORGANIZATION

0.99+

64 dollarQUANTITY

0.99+

70%QUANTITY

0.99+

TrumpPERSON

0.99+

Oskar AustegardPERSON

0.99+

JuneDATE

0.99+

OracleORGANIZATION

0.99+

OskarPERSON

0.99+

GoogleORGANIZATION

0.99+

NASAORGANIZATION

0.99+

KuboORGANIZATION

0.99+

oneQUANTITY

0.99+

last yearDATE

0.99+

HortonworksORGANIZATION

0.99+

four plus monthsQUANTITY

0.99+

99 yearsQUANTITY

0.99+

third oneQUANTITY

0.99+

Phoenix, ArizonaLOCATION

0.99+

a year agoDATE

0.99+

Splice MachineORGANIZATION

0.98+

BothQUANTITY

0.98+

MicrosoftORGANIZATION

0.98+

HadoopTITLE

0.98+

bothQUANTITY

0.97+

AzureORGANIZATION

0.97+

EachQUANTITY

0.96+

Monte ZwebenPERSON

0.96+

firstQUANTITY

0.94+

MapRsORGANIZATION

0.94+

earlier this morningDATE

0.92+

Wigwam ResortLOCATION

0.92+

two thingsQUANTITY

0.92+

2017DATE

0.92+

#DataPlatforms2017EVENT

0.89+

WikibonORGANIZATION

0.89+

second oneQUANTITY

0.89+

three trendsQUANTITY

0.89+

each business processQUANTITY

0.87+

DataPlatformsTITLE

0.86+

theCUBEORGANIZATION

0.85+

ClouderaORGANIZATION

0.85+

Hortonworks DataWorks SummitEVENT

0.85+

Wigwam ResortORGANIZATION

0.85+

KuboPERSON

0.84+

GannettORGANIZATION

0.82+

MapRORGANIZATION

0.8+

S3TITLE

0.8+

many years agoDATE

0.78+

DataPlatforms 2017EVENT

0.74+

yearsDATE

0.73+

YouTube.com/SiliconAngleOTHER

0.72+

ClouderasORGANIZATION

0.7+

Cloud NativeTITLE

0.67+

PlatformsTITLE

0.67+

Google CloudTITLE

0.64+

Cloud Native HadoopTITLE

0.64+

last coupleDATE

0.64+

AzureTITLE

0.61+