Christoph Scholtheis, Emanuele Baldassarre, & Philip Schmokel | AWS Executive Summit 2022
foreign welcome to thecube's coverage of AWS re invent 2022. this is a part of our AWS executive Summit AT AWS re invent sponsored by Accenture I'm your host Lisa Martin I've got three guests here with me Christoph schulteis head of devops and infrastructure at Vodafone Germany joins us as well as IMAP baldasare the Accenture AWS business group Europe delivery lead attic Center and Philip schmuckel senior manager at Accenture technology we're going to be talking about what Vodafone Germany is doing in terms of its agile transformation the business and I.T gentlemen it's great to have you on thecube Welcome to the program thank you thanks for having us my pleasure Kristoff let's go ahead and start with you talk to us about what Vodafone Germany is doing in its transformation project with Accenture and with AWS certainly these are but let me first start with explaining what Vodafone does in general so Vodafone is one of the leading telephone and Technology service providers in Germany half of all German citizens are Vodafone customers using Vodafone technology to access the internet make calls and watch TV in the economic sector we provide connectivity for office farms and factories so this is vodafone's largest business and I.T transformation and we're happy to have several Partners on this journey with more than a thousand people working in scaled agile framework with eight Agile Release strings and one of the largest safe implementations in Europe why are we doing this transformation well not only since the recent uncertainties the Telco Market is highly volatile and there are a few challenges that Vodafone was facing in the last years as there are Market changes caused by disruptions from technological advances in competitors or changing customer customer expectations who for example use more of the top services like Netflix or Amazon Prime video what is coming up in the next wave is unknown so Technologies evolve continual disruption from non-tel causes to be expected and being able to innovate fast is the key Focus for everyone in order to be able to react to that we need to cope with that and do so in different aspects to become the leading digital technology company therefore Vodafone Germany is highly simplifying its products as well as processes for example introducing free product upgrades for customers we're driving the change from a business perspective and modernize the it landscape which we call the technology transformation so simply business-led but it driven for that Accenture is our integration partner and AWS provides the services for our platforms got it thank you for the background on the Vodafone the impact that it's making you mentioned the volatility in the Telecom market and also setting the context for what Vodafone Germany is doing with Accenture and AWS email I want to bring you into the conversation now talk to us about the partnership between Accenture and Vodafone in AWS and how is it set up to provide maximum value for customers yeah that's a great question actually well I mean working in Partnership allows obviously to bring in transparency and trust and these are key starting points for a program of this magnitude and a program like this comes out of strong willingness to change the game both internally and on the market so as you can imagine particular attention is required that's top level alignment in general when you implement a program like this you also need to couple the long-term vision of how you want to manage your customers what are the new products that you want to bring to the market with the long-term technology roadmap because the thing that you don't want to happen is that you invest many years and a lot of efforts and then when it comes the end of the journey you figure out that you have to restart a New Journey and then you enter in the NeverEnding Loop so obviously all these things must come together and they come together in what we call the power of three and it consists in AWS Vodafone and Accenture having a strategic Vision alignment and constant updates and most importantly the best of breed in terms of technology and also people so what we do in practice is uh we bring together Market understanding business Vision technical expertise energy collaboration and what is even more important we work as a unique team everybody succeeds here and this is a true win-win partnership more specifically Vodafone leads the Strategic Direction obviously they understand the market they are close to their customers AWS provides all the expertise around the cloud infrastructure insights on the roadmap and this is a key element elasticity both technical but also Financial and the then Accenture comes with its ability to deliver with the strong industry expertise flexibility and when you combine all these ingredients together obviously you understand it's easy to succeed together the power of three it sounds quite compelling it sounds like a very partnership that has a lot of flexibility elasticity as you mentioned and obviously the customer at the end of the day benefits tremendously from that Kristoff I'd like to bring you back into the conversation talk to us about the unified unified platform approach how is walk us through how Vodafone is implementing it with AWS and with Accenture so the applications that form the basis for the transformation program were originally pursuing all kinds of approaches for deployment and use of AWS services in order to support faster adoption and optimize the usage that I mentioned before and we have provided the Vodafone Cloud framework that has been The Trusted platform for several projects within the it in Germany as a side effect the framework facilitates the compliance with Vodafone security requirements and the unified approach also has the benefit that someone who is moving from one team to another will find a structure that looks familiar the best part of the framework though is the operative rights deployment process that helps us reducing the time from implementing for example a new stage from a few weeks to me hours and that together with improvements of the cicd pipeline greatly helped us reducing the time to speed up something and deploy the software on it in order to reach our Target kpis the unified platform provides all kinds of setups like AWS eks and the ecosystem that is commonly used with coping dentists like service mesh monitoring logging and tracing but it can also be used for non-continental erased applications that we have and provide the integration with security monitoring and other tools at the moment we are in contact with other markets of Vodafone to globally share our experience in our code which makes introducing a similar system into other markets straightforward we are also continuously improving our approach and the completely new version of the framework is currently being introduced into the program Germany is doing is really kind of setting the stage as you mentioned Christopher other parts of the business who want to learn from so that's a great thing there that that what you're building is really going to spread throughout the organization and make a positive impact Philip let's bring you into the conversation now let's talk about how you're using AWS specifically to build the new Vodafone Cloud integration platform talk to us about that as part of this overall transformation program sure and let's make it even more specific let's talk API management so looking at the program and from a technology point of view what it really is it is a bold step for Vodafone it's rebuilding huge parts of the infrastructure of their business ID infrastructure on AWS it's Greenfield it's new it's a bold step I would say and then if you put the perspective of API management or integration architecture what I call it it's a unique opportunity at the same time so what it what it gives you is the the opportunity to build the API management layer or an API platform with standardized apis right from the get-go so from the beginning you can build the API platform on top which is in contrast what we see throughout the industry where we see huge problems at our clients at other engagements that try to build these layers as well but they're building them on Legacy so that really makes it unique here for Vodafone and a unique opportunity to we have this API first platform built as part of the transformation program so what we have been built is exactly this platform and as of today there is more than 50 standardized apis throughout the application landscape already available to give you a few examples there is an API where I can change customer data for instance I can change the payment method of a customer straight from an API or I can reboot a customer equipment right from it from an API to fix a network issue other than that of course I can submit an order to order one of vodafone's gigabit internet offerings so on top of the platform there's a developer portal which gives me the option to explore all of the apis yeah in a convenient way in a portal and that's yeah that's developer experience meaning I can log into this portal look through the apis understand what I what I need and just try it out directly from the portal I see the response of an API live in the portal and this is it is really in contrast to what what we've seen before where you would have a long word document a cumbersome spreadsheet a long lasting process to get your hands on and this really gives you the opportunity to just go in try out an API and see how it works so it's really developer experience and a big step forward here then yeah how have we built this platform of course it's running on AWS it's Cloud native it's using eks but what I want to point out here is three principles that that we applied where the first one is of course the cloud native principle meaning we using AKs we are using containers we have infrastructure scales so we aim for every component being Cloud native being meant to be run in the cloud so our infrastructure will sleep at night to save Vodafone cost and it will wake up for the Christmas business where Vodafone intends to do the biggest business and scale of its platform second there is the uh the aim for open API specifications what we aim for is event non-vendor-specific apis so it should not matter whether there's an mdocs backend there's a net tracker back end or an sap Behind These apis it is really meant to decouple the different Business Systems of of a Vodafone by these apis that can be applied by a new custom front-end or by a new business to business application to integrate these apis last but not least there's the automate everything so there's infrastructure as code all around our platform where where I would say the biggest magic of cloud is if we were to lose our production environment lose all apis today it will take us just a few minutes to get everything back and whatever everything I mean redeploy the platform redeploy all apis all services do the configuration again and it will be back in a few minutes that's impressive as downtime is so costly for so many different reasons I think we're gonna know when the vision of this transformation project when it's been achieved how are you going to know that okay so it's kind of flipping the perspective a bit uh maybe uh when I joined Vodafone in in late 2019 I would say the vision for Vodafone was already set and it was really well well put out there it was lived in in the organization it was for Vodafone to become a digital company to become a digital service provider to to get the engineering culture into the company and I would say this Vision has not changed until today maybe now call it a North star and maybe pointing out two big Milestones that have been achieved with this transformation program so we've talked about the safe framework already so with this program we wrote out the one of the biggest safe implementations in the industry which is a big step for Vodafone in its agile Journey as of today there's the safe framework supporting more than 1 000 FTE or 1000 colleagues working and providing value in the transformation program second example or second big milestone was the first go-life of the program so moving stuff to production really proving it works showcasing to the business that it it is actually working there is actually a value provided or constant value provided with a platform and then of course you're asking for next steps right uh talking next steps there is a renewed focus on value and A Renewed focus on value between Accenture and Vodafone means focus on what really provides the most value to Vodafone and I would like to point out two things here the first being migrate more customers scale the platform really prove the the the the the cloud native platform by migrating more customers to it and then second it enables you to decommission the Legacy Stacks decommissioning Legacy Stacks is why we are doing it right so it's migrating to the new migrating to the new platform so last but not least maybe you can hear it we will continue this journey together with with Vodafone to become a digital company or to say that their own words from Telco to TECO I love that from Telco to technology gentlemen thank you so much for joining us on thecube today talking about the power of three Accenture AWS Vodafone how you're really enabling Vodafone to transform into that digital technology company that consumers at the end of the day that demanding consumers want we appreciate your insights and your time thank you so much thank you for having us my pleasure for my guests I'm Lisa Martin you're watching thecube's coverage of the AWS executive Summit AT AWS re invent sponsored by Accenture thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
so from the beginning you can build the
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Christoph Scholtheis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Emanuele Baldassarre | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Philip Schmokel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Philip schmuckel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Germany | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Christoph schulteis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vodafone Germany | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
TECO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
more than a thousand people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
late 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Christopher | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
more than 1 000 FTE | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kristoff | PERSON | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Agile | TITLE | 0.98+ |
three guests | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three principles | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
1000 colleagues | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first platform | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one team | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
apis | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
AWS executive Summit | EVENT | 0.92+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Breaking Analysis: Cloudflare’s Supercloud…What Multi Cloud Could Have Been
from the cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston bringing you data-driven insights from the cube and ETR this is breaking analysis with Dave vellante over the past decade cloudflare has built a Global Network that has the potential to become the fourth us-based hyperscale class cloud in our view the company is building a durable Revenue model with hooks into many important markets these include the more mature DDOS protection space to other growth sectors such as zero trust a serverless platform for application development and an increasing number of services such as database and object storage and other network services in essence cloudflare could be thought of as a giant distributed supercomputer that can connect multiple clouds and act as a highly efficient scheduling engine at scale its disruptive DNA is increasingly attracting novel startups and established Global firms alike looking for Reliable secure high performance low latency and more cost-effective alternatives to AWS and Legacy infrastructure Solutions hello and welcome to this week's wikibon Cube insights powered by ETR in this breaking analysis we initiate our deeper coverage of cloudflare we'll briefly explain our take on the company and its unique business model we'll then share some peer comparisons with both the financial snapshot and some fresh ETR survey data finally we'll share some examples of how we think cloudflare could be a disruptive force with a super cloud-like offering that in many respects is what multi-cloud should have been cloudflare has been on our peripheral radar Ben Thompson and many others have written about their disruptive business model and recently a breaking analysis follower who will remain anonymous emailed with some excellent insights on cloudflare that prompted us to initiate more detailed coverage let's first take a look at how cloudflare seize the world in terms of its view of a modern stack this is a graphic from cloudflare that shows a simple three-layer Stack comprising Storage and compute the lower level and application layer and the network and their key message is basically that the big four hyperscalers have replaced the on-prem leaders apps have been satisfied and that mess of network that you see and Security in the upper left can now be handled all by cloudflare and the stack can be rented via Opex versus requiring heavy capex investment so okay somewhat of a simplified view is those companies on the the left are you know not standing still and we're going to come back to that but cloudflare has done something quite amazing I mean it's been a while since we've invoked Russ hanneman of Silicon Valley Fame on breaking analysis but remember when he was in a meeting one of his first meetings if not the first with Richard Hendricks it was the whiz kid on the show Silicon Valley and hanneman said something like if you had a blank check and you could build anything in the world what would it be and Richard's answer was basically a new internet and that led to Pied Piper this peer-to-peer Network powered by decentralized devices and and iPhones and this amazing compression algorithm that enabled high-speed data movement and low latency uh up to no low latency access across the network well in a way that's what cloudflare has built its founding premise reimagined how the internet should be built with a consistent set of server infrastructure where each server had lots of cores lots of dram lots of cash fast ssds and plenty of network connectivity and bandwidth and well this picture makes it look like a bunch of dots and points of presence on a map which of course it is there's a software layer that enables cloudflare to efficiently allocate resources across this Global Network the company claims that it's Network utilization is in the 70 percent range and it has used its build out to enter the technology space from the bottoms up offering for example free tiers of services to users with multiple entry points on different services and selling then more services over time to a customer which of course drives up its average contract value and its lifetime value at the same time the company continues to innovate and add new services at a very rapid cloud-like Pace you can think of cloudflare's initial Market entry as like a lightweight Cisco as a service the company's CFO actually he uses that term he calls it that which really must tick off Cisco who of course has a massive portfolio and a dominant Market position now because it owns the network cloudflare is a marginal cost of adding new Services is very small and goes towards zero so it's able to get software like economics at scale despite all this infrastructure that's building out so it doesn't have to constantly face the increasing infrastructure tax snowflake for example doesn't own its own network infrastructure as it grows it relies on AWS or Azure gcp and and while it gives the company obvious advantages it doesn't have to build out its own network it also requires them to constantly pay the tax and negotiate with hyperscalers for better rental rates now as previously mentioned Cloud Fair cloudflare claims that its utilization is very high probably higher than the hyperscalers who can spin up servers that they can charge for underutilized customer capacity cloudflare also has excellent Network traffic data that it can use to its Advantage with its Analytics the company has been rapidly innovating Beyond its original Core Business adding as I said before serverless zero trust offerings it has announced a database it calls its database D1 that's pretty creative and it's announced an object store called R2 that is S3 minus one both from the alphabet and the numeric I.E minus the egress cost saying no egress cost that's their big claim to fame and they've made a lot of marketing noise around about that and of course they've promised in our a D2 database which of course is R2D2 RR they've launched a developer platform cloudflare can be thought of kind of like first of all a modern CDN they've got a simpler security model that's how they compete for example with z-scaler that brings uh they also bring VPN sd-wan and DDOS protection services that are that are part of the network and they're less expensive than AWS that's kind of their sort of go to market and messaging and value proposition and they're positioning themselves as a neutral Network that can connect across multiple clouds now to be clear unlike AWS in particular cloudflare is not well suited to lift and shift your traditional apps like for instance sap Hana you're not going to run that in on cloudflare's platform rather the company started by making websites more secure and faster and it flew under the radar and much in the same way that clay Christensen described the disruption in the steel industry if you've seen that where new entrants picked off the low margin rebar business then moved up the stack we've used that analogy in the semiconductor business with arm and and even China cloudflare is running a similar playbook in the cloud and in the network so in the early part of the last decade as aws's ascendancy was becoming more clear many of us started thinking about how and where firms could compete and add value as AWS is becoming so dominant so for instance take an industry Focus you could do things like data sharing with snowflake eventually you know uh popularized you could build on top of clouds again snowflake is doing that as are others you could build private clouds and of course connect to hybrid clouds but not many had the wherewithal and or the hutzpah to build out a Global Network that could serve as a connecting platform for cloud services cloudflare has traction in the market as it adds new services like zero trust and object store or database its Tam continues to grow here's a quick snapshot of cloudflare's financials relative to Z scalar which is both a competitor and a customer fastly which is a smaller CDN and Akamai a more mature CDN slash Edge platform cloudflare and fastly both reported earnings this past week Cloud Fair Cloud flare surpassed a billion dollar Revenue run rate but they gave tepid guidance and the stock got absolutely crushed today which is Friday but the company's business model is sound it's growing close to 50 annually it has sas-like gross margins in the mid to high 70s and it's it it's got a very strong balance sheet and a 13x revenue run rate multiple in fact it's Financial snapshot is quite close to that of z-scaler which is kind of interesting which zinc sailor of course doesn't own its own network that's a pure play software company fastly is much smaller and growing more slowly than cloudflare hence its lower multiple well Akamai as you can see is a more mature company but it's got a nice business now on its earnings call this week cloudflare announced that its head of sales was stepping down and the company has brought in a new leader to take the firm to five billion dollars in sales I think actually its current sales leader felt like hey you know my work is done here bring on somebody else to take it to the next level the company is promising to be free cash flow positive by the end of the year and is working hard toward its long-term financial model or so working towards sorry it's a long-term financial model with gross margin Targets in the mid 70s it's targeting 20 non-gaap operating margins so so solid you know very solid not like completely off the charts but you know very good and to our knowledge it has not committed to a long-term growth rate but at that sort of operating profit level you would like to see growth be consistently at least in the 20 range so they could at least be a rule of 40 company or perhaps even even five even higher if they're going to continue to command a premium valuation okay let's take a look at the ETR data ETR is very positive on cloudflare and has recently published a report on the company like many companies cloudflare is seeing an across the board slowdown in spending velocity we've reported on this quite extensively using the ETR data to quantify the degree to that Slowdown and on the data set with ETR we see that many customers they're shifting their spend to Flat spend you know plus or minus let's say you know single digits you know two three percent or even zero or in the market we're seeing a shift from paid to free tiers remember cloudflare offers a lot of free services as you're seeing customers maybe turn off the pay for a while and going with the freebie but we're also seeing some larger customers in the data and the fortune 1000 specifically they're actually spending more which was confirmed on cloudflare's earnings call they did say everything across the board was softer but they did also indicate that some of their larger customers are actually growing faster than their smaller customers and their churn is very very low here's a two-dimensional graphic we'd like to share this view a lot it's got Net score or spending momentum on the vertical axis and overlap or pervasiveness in the survey on the horizontal axis and this cut isolates three segments in the etrs taxonomy that cloudflare plays in Cloud security and networking now the table inserted in that upper left there shows the raw data which informs the position of each company in the dots with Net score in the ends listed in that rightmost column the red dotted line indicates a highly elevated Net score and finally we posted the breakdown those colors in the bottom right of cloudflare's Net score the lime green that's new adoptions the forest green is we're spending more six percent or more the gray is flat plus or minus uh five percent and you can see that the majority of customers you can see that's the majority of the customers that gray area the pink is we're spending Less in other words down six percent or worse and the bright red is churn which is minimal one percent very good indicator for for cloudflare what you do to get etr's proprietary Net score and they've done this for many many quarters so we have that time series data you subtract the Reds from the greens and that's Net score cloudflare is at 39 just under that magic red line now note that cloudflare and zscaler are right on top of each other Cisco has a dominant position on the x-axis that cloudflare and others are eyeing AWS is also dominant but note that its Net score is well above the red dotted line it's incredible Palo Alto networks is also very impressive it's got both a strong presence on the horizontal axis and it's got a Net score that's pretty comparable to cloudflare and z-scaler to much smaller companies Akamai is actually well positioned for a reasonably mature company and you can see fastly ATT Juniper and F5 have far less spending momentum on their platforms than does cloudflare but at least they are in positive Net score territory so what's going to be really interesting to see is whether cloudflare can continue to hold this momentum or even accelerate it as we've seen with some other clouds as it scales its Network and keeps adding more and more services cloudflare has a couple of potential strategic vectors that we want to talk about and it'll be going to be interesting to see how that plays out Now One path is to compete more directly as a Cloud Player offering secure access Edge services like firewall as a service and zero Trust Services like data loss prevention email security from its area one acquisition and other zero trust offerings as well as Network Services like routing and network connectivity this is The Sweet Spot of the company load balancing many others and then add in things like Object Store and database Services more Edge services in the future it might be telecom like services such as Network switching for offices so that's one route and cloudflare is clearly on that path more services more cohorts at innovating and and growing the company and bringing in more Revenue increasing acvs and and increasing long-term value and keeping retention high now the other Vector is what we're just going to refer to as super cloud as an enabler of cross-cloud infrastructure this is new value uh relative to the former Vector that we were just talking about now the title of this episode is what multi-cloud should have been meaning cloudflare could be the control plane providing a consistent experience across clouds one that is fast and secure at global scale now to give you Insight on this let's take a look at some of the comments made by Matthew Prince the CEO and co-founder of cloudflare cloudflare put its R2 Object Store into public beta this past May and I believe it's storing around a petabyte of data today I think that's what they said in their call here's what Prince said about that quote we are talking to very large companies about moving more and more of their stored objects to where we can store that with R2 and one of the benefits is not only can we help them save money on the egress fees but it allows them to then use those object stores or objects across any of the different Cloud platforms they're that they're using so by being that neutral third party we can let people adopt a little bit of Amazon a little bit of Microsoft a little bit of Google a little bit of SAS vendors and share that data across all those different places so what's interesting about this in the super cloud context is it suggests that customers could take the best of each Cloud to power their digital businesses I might like AWS for in redshift for my analytic database or I love Google's machine learning Microsoft's collaboration and I'd like a consistent way to connect those resources but of course he's strongly hinting and has made many public statements that aws's egress fees are a blocker to that vision now at a recent investor event Matthew Prince added some color to this concept when he talked about one metric of success being how much R2 capacity was consumed and how much they sold but perhaps a more interesting Benchmark is highlighted by the following statement that he made he said a completely different measure of success for R2 is Andy jassy says I'm sick and tired of these guys meaning cloudflare taking our objects away we're dropping our egress fees to zero I would be so excited because we've then unlocked the ability to be the network that interconnects the cloud together now of course it would be Adam solipski who would be saying that or maybe Andy Jesse you know still watching over AWS and I think it's highly unlikely that that's going to happen anytime soon and that of course but but in theory gets us closer to the super cloud value proposition and to further drive that point home and we're paraphrasing a little bit his comments here he said something the effect of quote customers need one consistent control plane across clouds and we are the neutral Network that can be consistent no matter which Cloud you're using interesting right that Prince sees the world that's similar to if not nearly identical to the concepts that the cube Community has been putting forth around supercloud now this vision is a ways off let's be real Prince even suggested that his initial vision of an application running across multiple clouds you know that's like super cloud Nirvana isn't what customers are doing today that's that's really hard to do and perhaps you know it's never going to happen but there's a little doubt that cloudflare could be and is positioning itself as that cross-cloud control plane it has the network economics and the business model levers to pull it's got an edge up on the competition at the edge pun intended cloudflare is the definition of Edge and it's distributed platform it's decentralized platform is much better suited for Edge workloads than these giant data centers that are you know set up to to try and handle that today the the hyperscalers are building out you know their Edge networks things like outposts you know going out to the edge and other local zones Etc now cloudflare is increasingly competitive to the hyperscalers and those traditional Stacks that it depositioned on an earlier slide that we showed but you know the likes of AWS and Dell and hpe and Cisco and those others they're not sitting in their hands they have a huge huge customer install bases and they are definitely a moving Target they're investing and they're building out their own Super clouds with really robust stacks as well let's face it it's going to take a decade or more for Enterprises to adopt a developer platform or a new database Cloud plus cloudflare's capabilities when compared to incumbent stacks and the hyperscalers is much less robust in these areas and even in storage you know despite all the great conversation that R2 generated and the buzz you take a specialist like Wasabi they're more mature they're more functional and they're way cheaper even than cloudflare so you know it's not a fake a complete that cloudflare is going to win in those markets but we love the disruption and if cloudflare wants to be the fourth us-based hyperscaler or join the the big four as the as the fifth if we put Alibaba in the mix it's got a lot of work to do in the ecosystem by its own admission as much to learn and is part of the value by the way that it sees in its area one acquisition it's email security company that it bought but even in that case much of the emphasis has been on reseller channels compare that to the AWS ecosystem which is not only a channel play but is as much an innovation flywheel filling gaps where companies like snowflake Thrive side by side with aws's data stores as well all the on-prem stacks are building hybrid connections to AWS and other clouds as a means of providing consistent experiences across clouds indeed many of them see what they call cross-cloud services or what we call super cloud hyper cloud or whatever you know Mega Cloud you want to call it we use super cloud they are really eyeing that opportunity so very few companies frankly are not going after that space but we're going to close with this cloudflare is one of those companies that's in a position to wake up each morning and ask who can we disrupt today and very few companies are in a position to disrupt the hyperscalers to the degree that cloudflare is and that my friends is going to be fascinating to watch unfold all right let's call it a wrap I want to thank Alex Meyerson who's on production and manages the podcast as well as Ken schiffman who's our newest addition to the Boston Studio Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight help us get the word out on social media and in our newsletters and Rob Hof is our editor-in-chief over at silicon angle thank you to all remember all these episodes are available as podcasts wherever you listen all you're going to do is search breaking analysis podcasts I publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com you can email me at david.velante at siliconangle.com or DM me at divalante if you comment on my LinkedIn posts and please do check out etr.ai they got the best survey data in the Enterprise Tech business this is Dave vellante for the cube insights powered by ETR thank you very much for watching and we'll see you next time on breaking analysis
SUMMARY :
that the majority of customers you can
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Meyerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Richard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matthew Prince | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ken schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matthew Prince | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam solipski | PERSON | 0.99+ |
70 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rob Hof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Prince | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jesse | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
13x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
hanneman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Ben Thompson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Richard Hendricks | PERSON | 0.99+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Andy jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
39 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhones | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
five percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston Studio | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Akamai | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
clay Christensen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
aws | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
R2 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
40 company | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
fifth | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
sap | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Russ hanneman | PERSON | 0.98+ |
cloudflare | TITLE | 0.98+ |
each company | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each week | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
mid 70s | DATE | 0.97+ |
ETR | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
each server | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.97+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two three percent | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
each morning | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
S3 | TITLE | 0.95+ |
one metric | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
hpe | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
one acquisition | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Michael Rogers, CrowdStrike | CrowdStrike Fal.Con 2022
foreign okay we're back at Falcon 2022 crowdstrike's big user conference first time in a couple of years obviously because of kova this is thecube's coverage Dave vellante and Dave Nicholson wall-to-wall coverage two days in a row Michael Rogers the series the newly minted vice president of global alliances at crowdstrike Michael first of all congratulations on the new appointment and welcome to the cube thank you very much it's an honor to be here so dial back just a bit like think about your first hundred days in this new role what was it like who'd you talk to what'd you learn wow well the first hundred days were filled with uh excitement uh I would say 18 plus hours a day getting to know the team across the globe a wonderful team across all of the partner types that we cover and um just digging in and spending time with people and understanding uh what the partner needs were and and and and it was just a it was a blur but a blast I agree with any common patterns that you heard that you could sort of coalesce around yeah I mean I think that uh really what a common thing that we hear at crowdstrike whether it's internal is extra external is getting to the market as fast as possible there's so much opportunity and every time we open a door the resource investment we need we continue to invest in resources and that was an area that we identified and quickly pivoted and started making some of those new investments in a structure of the organization how we cover Partners uh how we optimize uh the different routes to Market with our partners and yeah just a just a it's been a wonderful experience and in my 25 years of cyber security uh actually 24 and a half as of Saturday uh I can tell you that I have never felt and had a better experience in terms of culture people and a greater mission for our customers and our partners you'll Max funny a lot of times Dave we talk about this is we you know we learned a lot from Amazon AWS with the cloud you know taking something you did internally pointing it externally to Pizza teams there's shared responsibility model we talk about that and and one of the things is blockers you know Amazon uses that term blocker so were there any blockers that you identified that you're you're sort of working with the partner ecosystem to knock down to accelerate that go to market well I mean if I think about what we had put in place prior and I had the benefit of being vice president of America's prior to the appointment um and had the pleasure of succeeding my dear friend and Mentor Matthew Pauley um a lot of that groundwork was put in place and we work collectively as a leadership team to knock down a lot of those blockers and I think it really as I came into the opportunity and we made new Investments going into the fiscal year it's really getting to Market as fast as possible it's a massive Target addressable market and identifying the right routes and how to how to harness that power of we to drive the most value to the marketplace yeah what is it what does that look like in terms of alliances alliances can take a lot of shape we've we've talked to uh service providers today as an example um our Global Systems integrators in that group also what what is what does the range look like yeah I mean alliances at crowdstrike and it's a great question because a lot of times people think alliances and they only think of Technology alliances and for us it spans really any and all routes to Market it could be your traditional solution providers which might be regionally focused it could be nationally focused larger solution providers or Lars as you noted service providers and telcos global system integrators mssps iot Partners OEM Partners um and store crouchstrike store Partners so you look across that broad spectrum and we cover it all so the mssps we heard a lot about that on the recent earnings call we've heard this is a consistent theme we've interviewed a couple here today what's driving that I mean is it the fact that csos are just you know drowning for talent um and why crowdstrike why is there such an affinity between mssps and crowdstrike yeah a great question we um and you noted that uh succinctly that csos today are faced with the number one challenge is lack of resources and cyber security the last that I heard was you know in the hundreds of thousands like 350 000 and that's an old stat so I would venture to Guess that the open positions in cyber security are north of a half a million uh as we sit here today and um service providers and mssps are focused on providing service to those customers that are understaffed and have that Personnel need and they are harnessing the crowdstrike platform to bring a cloud native best of breed solution to their customers to augment and enhance the services that they bring to those customers so partner survey what tell us about the I love surveys I love data you know this what was the Genesis of the survey who took it give us the breakdown yeah that's a great question no uh nothing is more important than the feedback that we get from our partners so every single year we do a partner survey it reaches all partner types in the uh in the ecosystem and we use the net promoter score model and so we look at ourselves in terms of how we how we uh rate against other SAS solution providers and then we look at how we did last year and in the next year and so I'm happy to say that we increased our net promoter score by 16 percent year over year but my philosophy is there's always room for improvement so the feedback from our partners on the positive side they love the Falcon platform they love the crowdstrike technology they love the people that they work with at crowdstrike and they like our enablement programs the areas that they like us to see more investment in is the partner program uh better and enhanced enablement making it easier to work with crowdstrike and more opportunities to offer services enhance services to their customers dramatic differences between the types of Partners and and if so you know why do you think those were I mean like you mentioned you know iot Partners that's kind of a new area you know so maybe maybe there was less awareness there were there any sort of differences that you noticed by type of partner I would say that you know the areas or the part the partners that identified areas for improvement were the partners that that uh either were new to crowdstrike or they're areas that we're just investing in uh as as we expand as a company and a demand from the market is you know pull this thing into these new routes to Market um not not one in particular I mean iot is something that we're looking to really blow up in the next uh 12 to 18 months um but no no Common Thread uh consistent feedback across the partner base speaking of iot he brought it up before it's is it in a you see it as an adjacency to i-team it seems like it and OT used to never talk to each other and now they're increasingly doing so but they're still it still seems like different worlds what have you found and learned in that iot partner space yeah I mean I think the key and we the way we look at the journey is it starts with um Discovery discovering the assets that are in the OT environment um it then uh transitions to uh detection and response and really prevention and once you can solve that and you build that trust through certifications in the industry um you know it really is a game changer anytime you have Global in your job title first word that comes to mind for me anyway is sovereignty issues is that something that you deal with in this space uh in terms of partners that you're working with uh focusing on Partners in certain regions so that they can comply with any governance or sovereignty yeah that's that's a great question Dave I mean we have a fantastic and deep bench on our compliance team and there are certain uh you know parameters and processes that have been put in place to make sure that we have a solid understanding in all markets in terms of sovereignty and and uh where we're able to play and how that were you North America before or Americas uh Americas America so you're familiar with the sovereignty issue yeah a little already Latin America is certainly uh exposed me plenty of plenty of that yes 100 so you mentioned uh uh Tam before I think it was total available Market you had a different word for the t uh total addressable Mark still addressable Market okay fine so I'm hearing Global that's a tam expansion opportunity iot is definitely you know the OT piece and then just working better um you know better Groove swing with the partners for higher velocity when you think about the total available total addressable market and and accelerating penetration and growing your Tam I've seen the the charts in your investor presentation and you know starts out small and then grows to you know I think it could be 100 billion I do a lot of Tam analysis but just my back a napkin had you guys approaching 100 billion anyway how do you think about the Tam and what role do Partners play in terms of uh increasing your team yeah that's a great question I mean if you think about it today uh George announced on the day after our 11th anniversary as a company uh 20 000 customers and and if you look at that addressable Market just in the SMB space it's north of 50 million companies that are running on Legacy on-prem Solutions and it really provides us an opportunity to provide those customers with uh Next Generation uh threat protection and and detection and and response partners are the route to get there there is no doubt that we cannot cover 50 50 million companies requires a span of of uh of of of a number of service providers and mssps to get to that market and that's where we're making our bets what what's an SMB that is a candidate for crowdstrike like employee size or how do you look at that like what's the sort of minimum range yeah the way we segment out the SMB space it's 250 seats or endpoints and below 250 endpoints yes right and so it's going to be fairly significant so math changes with xdr with the X and xdr being extended the greater number of endpoints means that a customer today when you talk about total addressable Market that market can expand even without expanding the number of net new customers is that a fair yeah Fair assessment yep yeah you got that way in that way but but map that to like company size can you roughly what's the what's the smallest s that would do business with crowdstrike yeah I mean we have uh companies as small as five employees that will leverage crowd strike yeah 100 and they've got hundreds of endpoints oh no I'm sorry five uh five endpoints is oh okay so it's kind of 250 endpoints as well like the app that's the sweets that's it's that's kind of the Top Line we look at and then we focus oh okay when we Define SMB it's below so five to 250 endpoints right yes and so roughly so you're talking to companies with less than 100 employees right yeah yeah so I mean this is what I was talking about before I say I look around the the ecosystem myself it kind of reminds me of service now in 2013 but servicenow never had a SMB play right and and you know very kind of proprietary closed platform not that you don't have a lot of propriety in your platform you do but you they were never going to get down Market there and their Tam is not as big in my view but I mean your team is when you start bringing an iot it's it's mind-boggling it's endless how large it could be yeah all right so what's your vision for the Elevate program partner program well I I look at uh a couple things that we've we've have in place today one is um one is we've we've established for the first time ever at crowdstrike the Alliance program management office apmo and that team is focused on building out our next Generation partner program and that's you know processes it's you know uh it's it's ring fencing but it's most important importantly identifying capabilities for partners to expand to reduce friction and uh grow their business together with crowdstrike we also look at uh what we call program Harmony and that's taking all of the partner types or the majority of the partner types and starting to look at it with the customer in the middle and so multiple partners can play a role on the journey to bringing a customer on board initially to supporting that customer going forward and they can all participate and be rewarded for their contribution to that opportunity so it's really a key area for us going forward Hub and spoke model with the center of the that model is the customer you're saying that's good okay so you're not like necessarily fighting each other for for a sort of ownership of that model but uh cool Michael Rogers thanks so much for coming on thecube it was great to have you my pleasure thank you for having me you're welcome all right keep it right there Dave Nicholson and Dave vellante we'll be right back to Falcon 22 from the Aria in Las Vegas you're watching thecube foreign [Music]
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Rogers | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
250 seats | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
25 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
16 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
less than 100 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
250 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first hundred days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Americas | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five employees | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
250 endpoints | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
18 plus hours a day | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
24 and a half | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Mentor Matthew Pauley | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Saturday | DATE | 0.96+ |
hundreds of endpoints | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Latin America | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
first hundred days | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
50 50 million companies | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
north of a half a million | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first word | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
11th anniversary | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
18 months | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
iot | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
five endpoints | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Global | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
20 000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
north of 50 million companies | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
CrowdStrike | EVENT | 0.85+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
crowdstrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.83+ |
Falcon 22 | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
number one | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
Falcon 2022 crowdstrike | EVENT | 0.75+ |
couple of years | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
350 000 | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
vice president | PERSON | 0.7+ |
every single year | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
uh Next Generation | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
Fal.Con 2022 | EVENT | 0.63+ |
Falcon | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
big user conference | EVENT | 0.61+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.6+ |
Elevate | TITLE | 0.57+ |
below | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
Lars | PERSON | 0.54+ |
Aria | LOCATION | 0.53+ |
Alliance | ORGANIZATION | 0.53+ |
president | PERSON | 0.51+ |
George | PERSON | 0.51+ |
America | ORGANIZATION | 0.5+ |
Legacy | ORGANIZATION | 0.49+ |
csos | TITLE | 0.47+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.45+ |
Generation | OTHER | 0.44+ |
Alan Jacobson, Alteryx | Democratizing Analytics Across the Enterprise
>>Hey, everyone. Welcome back to accelerating analytics, maturity. I'm your host. Lisa Martin, Alan Jacobson joins me next. The chief data and analytics officer at Altrix Ellen. It's great to have you on the program. >>Thanks Lisa. >>So Ellen, as we know, everyone knows that being data driven is very important. It's a household term these days, but 93% of organizations are not utilizing the analytics skills of their employees, which is creating a widening analytics gap. What's your advice, your recommendations for organizations who are just starting out with analytics >>And you're spot on many organizations really aren't leveraging the, the full capability of their knowledge workers. And really the first step is probably assessing where you are on the journey, whether that's you personally, or your organization as a whole, we just launched an assessment tool on our website that we built with the international Institute of analytics, that in a very short period of time, in about 15 minutes, you can go on and answer some questions and understand where you sit versus your peer set versus competitors and kind of where you are on the journey. >>So when people talk about data analytics, they often think, ah, this is for data science experts like people like you. So why should people in the lines of business like the finance folks, the marketing folks, why should they learn analytics? >>So domain experts are really in the best position. They, they know where the gold is buried in their companies. They know where the inefficiencies are, and it is so much easier and faster to teach a domain expert a bit about how to automate a process or how to use analytics than it is to take a data scientist and try to teach them to have the knowledge of a 20 year accounting professional or a, or a logistics expert of your company. It much harder to do that. And really, if you think about it, the world has changed dramatically in a very short period of time. If, if you were a marketing professional 30 years ago, you likely didn't need to know anything about the internet, but today, do you know what you would call that marketing professional? If they didn't know anything about the internet, probably unemployed or retired. And so knowledge workers are having to learn more and more skills to really keep up with their professions. And analytics is really no exception. Pretty much in every profession, people are needing to learn analytics, to stay current and, and be capable for their companies. And companies need people who can do that. >>Absolutely. It seems like it's table stakes. These days, let's look at different industries. Now, are there differences in how you see analytics in automation being employed in different industries? I know Altrix is being used across a lot of different types of organizations from government to retail. I also see you're now with some of the leading sports teams, any differences in industries. >>Yeah. There's an incredible actually commonality between domains industry to industry. So if you look at what an HR professional is doing, maybe attrition analysis, it's probably quite similar, whether they're in oil and gas or in a high tech software company. And so really the similarities are, are much larger than you might think. And even on the, on, on the, on the sports front, we see many of the analytics that sports teams perform are very similar. So McLaren is one of the great partners that we work with and they use TRICS across many areas of their business from finance to production, extreme sports, logistics, wind tunnel engineering, the marketing team analyzes social media data, all using Altrics. And if I take as an example, the finance team, the finance team is trying to optimize the budget to make sure that they can hit the very stringent targets that F1 sports has. And I don't see a ton of difference between the optimization that they're doing to hit their budget numbers and what I see fortune 500 finance departments doing to optimize their budget. And so really the, the commonality is very high. Even across industries. >>I bet every F fortune 500 or even every company would love to be compared to the same department within McLaren F1, just to know that wow, what they're doing is so in incre incredibly important as is what we are doing. Absolutely. So talk about lessons learned, what lessons can business leaders take from those organizations like McLaren, who are the most analytically mature >>Probably first and foremost, is that the ROI with analytics and automation is incredibly high. Companies are having a ton of success. It's becoming an existential threat to some degree, if, if your company isn't going on this journey and your competition is it, it can be a, a huge problem. IDC just did a recent study about how companies are unlocking the ROI using analytics. And the data was really clear organizations that have a higher percentage of their workforce using analytics are enjoying a much higher return from their analytic investment. And so it's not about hiring two double PhD statisticians from Oxford. It really is how widely you can bring your workforce on this journey. Can they all get 10% more capable? And that's having incredible results at businesses all over the world. An another key finding that they had is that the majority of them said that when they had many folks using analytics, they were going on the journey faster than companies they didn't. And so picking technologies, that'll help everyone do this and, and do this fast and do it easily. Having an approachable piece of software that everyone can use is really a key, >>So faster able to move faster, higher ROI. I also imagine analytics across the organization is a big competitive advantage for organizations in any industry. >>Absolutely the IDC or not. The IDC, the international Institute of analytics showed huge correlation between companies that were more analytically mature versus ones that were not. They showed correlation to growth of the company. They showed correlation to revenue and they showed correlation to shareholder values. So across really all of the, the, the key measures of business, the more analytically mature companies simply outperformed their competition. >>And that's key these days is to be able to outperform your competition. You know, one of the things that we hear so often, Alan, is people talking about democratizing data and analytics. You talked about the line of business workers, but I gotta ask you, is it really that easy for the line of business workers who aren't trained in data science, to be able to jump in, look at data, uncover and extract business insights to make decisions. >>So in, in many ways, it really is that easy. I have a 14 and 16 year old kid. Both of them have learned Altrics they're, Altrics certified. And, and it was quite easy. It took 'em about 20 hours and they were, they, they were off to the races, but there can be some hard parts. The hard parts have more to do with change management. I mean, if you're an accountant, that's been doing the best accounting work in your company for the last 20 years. And all you happen to know is a spreadsheet for those 20 years. Are you ready to learn some new skills? And, and I would suggest you probably need to, if you want, keep up with your profession. The, the big four accounting firms have trained over a hundred thousand people in Altrix just one firm has trained over a hundred thousand. >>You, you can't be an accountant or an auditor at some of these places with, without knowing Altrix. And so the hard part, really in the end, isn't the technology and learning analytics and data science. The harder part is this change management change is hard. I should probably eat better and exercise more, but it's, it's hard to always do that. And so companies are finding that that's the hard part. They need to help people go on the journey, help people with the change management to, to help them become the digitally enabled accountant of the future. The, the logistics professional that is E enabled that that's the challenge. >>That's a huge challenge. Cultural, cultural shift is a challenge. As you said, change management. How, how do you advise customers? If you might be talking with someone who might be early in their analytics journey, but really need to get up to speed and mature to be competitive, how do you guide them or give them recommendations on being able to facilitate that change management? >>Yeah, that's a great question. So, so people entering into the workforce today, many of them are starting to have these skills Altrics is used in over 800 universities around the globe to teach finance and to teach marketing and to teach logistics. And so some of this is happening naturally as new workers are entering the workforce, but for all of those who are already in the workforce have already started their careers, learning in place becomes really important. And so we work with companies to put on programmatic approaches to help their workers do this. And so it's, again, not simply putting a box of tools in the corner and saying free, take one. We put on hackathons and analytic days, and it can, it can be great fun. We, we have a great time with, with many of the customers that we work with helping them, you know, do this, helping them go on the journey and the ROI, as I said, you know, is fantastic. And not only does it sometimes affect the bottom line, it can really make societal changes. We've seen companies have breakthroughs that really make great impact to society as a whole. >>Isn't that so fantastic to see the, the difference that that can make. It sounds like you're, you guys are doing a great job of democratizing access to alter X to everybody. We talked about the line of business folks and the incredible importance of enabling them and the, the ROI, the speed, the competitive advantage. Can you share some specific examples that you think of Alter's customers that really show data breakthroughs by the lines of business using the technology? >>Yeah, absolutely. So, so many to choose from I'll I'll, I'll give you two examples. Quickly. One is armor express. They manufacture life saving equipment, defensive equipments, like armor plated vests, and they were needing to optimize their supply chain, like many companies through the pandemic. We, we see how important the supply chain is. And so adjusting supply to, to match demand is, is really vital. And so they've used all tricks to model some of their supply and demand signals and built a predictive model to optimize the supply chain. And it certainly helped out from a, a dollar standpoint, they cut over a half a million dollars of inventory in the first year, but more importantly, by matching that demand and supply signal, you're able to better meet customer customer demand. And so when people have orders and are, are looking to pick up a vest, they don't wanna wait. >>And, and it becomes really important to, to get that right. Another great example is British telecom. They're, they're a company that services the public sector. They have very strict reporting regulations that they have to meet and they had, and, and this is crazy to think about over 140 legacy spreadsheet models that they had to run to comply with these regulatory processes and, and report, and obviously running 140 legacy models that had to be done in a certain order and linked incredibly challenging. It took them over four weeks, each time that they had to go through that process. And so to, to save time and have more efficiency in doing that, they trained 50 employees over just a two week period to start using Altrix and, and, and learn Altrix. And they implemented an all new reporting process that saw a 75% reduction in the number of man hours. >>It took to run in a 60% runtime performance. And so, again, a huge improvement. I can imagine it probably had better quality as well, because now that it was automated, you don't have people copying and past data into a spreadsheet. And that was just one project that this group of, of folks were able to accomplish that had huge ROI, but now those people are moving on and automating other processes and performing analytics in, in other areas, you can imagine the impact by the end of the year that they will have on their business, you know, potentially millions upon millions of dollars. This is what we see again. And again, company after company government agency, after government agency is how analytics are really transforming the way work is being done. >>That was the word that came to mind when you were describing the all three customer examples, the transformation, this is transformative. The ability to leverage alters to, to truly democratize data and analytics, give access to the lines of business is transformative for every organization. And, and also the business outcomes. You mentioned, those are substantial metrics based business outcomes. So the ROI and leveraging a technology like alri seems to be right there, sitting in front of you. >>That's right. And, and to be honest, it's not only important for these businesses. It's important for, for the knowledge workers themselves. I mean, we, we hear it from people that they discover Alrich, they automate a process. They finally get to get home for dinner with their families, which is fantastic, but, but it leads to new career paths. And so, you know, knowledge workers that have these added skills have so much larger opportunity. And I think it's great when the needs of businesses to become more analytics and analytic and automate processes actually matches the needs of the employees. And, you know, they too wanna learn these skills and become more advanced in their capabilities, >>Huge value there for the business, for the employees themselves to expand their skillset, to, to really open up so many opportunities for not only the business to meet the demands of the demanding customer, but the employees to be able to really have that breadth and depth in their field of service. Great opportunities there. Alan, is there anywhere that you wanna point the audience to go, to learn more about how they can get started? >>Yeah. So one of the things that we're really excited about is how fast and easy it is to learn these tools. So any of the listeners who wanna experience Altrix, they can go to the website, there's a free download on the website. You can take our analytic maturity assessment, as we talked about at the beginning and, and see where you are on the journey and just reach out. You know, we'd love to work with you and your organization to see how we can help you accelerate your journey on, on analytics and automation, >>Alan, it was a pleasure talking to you about democratizing data and analytics, the power in it for organizations across every industry. We appreciate your insights and your time. >>Thank you so much >>In a moment, Paula Hanson, who is the president and chief revenue officer of ultras and Jackie Vander lay graying. Who's the global head of tax technology at eBay will join me. You're watching the cube, the leader in high tech enterprise coverage.
SUMMARY :
It's great to have you on the program. the analytics skills of their employees, which is creating a widening analytics gap. And really the first step is probably assessing finance folks, the marketing folks, why should they learn analytics? about the internet, but today, do you know what you would call that marketing professional? government to retail. And so really the similarities are, are much larger than you might think. to the same department within McLaren F1, just to know that wow, what they're doing is so And the data was really I also imagine analytics across the organization is a big competitive advantage for They showed correlation to revenue and they showed correlation to shareholder values. And that's key these days is to be able to outperform your competition. And all you happen to know is a spreadsheet for those 20 years. And so companies are finding that that's the hard part. their analytics journey, but really need to get up to speed and mature to be competitive, the globe to teach finance and to teach marketing and to teach logistics. job of democratizing access to alter X to everybody. So, so many to choose from I'll I'll, I'll give you two examples. models that they had to run to comply with these regulatory processes and, the end of the year that they will have on their business, you know, potentially millions upon millions So the ROI and leveraging a technology like alri seems to be right there, And so, you know, knowledge workers that have these added skills have so much larger opportunity. of the demanding customer, but the employees to be able to really have that breadth and depth in So any of the listeners who wanna experience Altrix, Alan, it was a pleasure talking to you about democratizing data and analytics, the power in it for Who's the global head of tax technology at eBay will
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paula Hanson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan Jacobson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
60% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Altrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
14 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ellen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eBay | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
16 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
93% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jackie Vander | PERSON | 0.99+ |
McLaren | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Altrix Ellen | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IDC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two examples | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over a hundred thousand | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over a hundred thousand people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 800 universities | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one firm | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two week | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Altrics | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
each time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Institute of analytics | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Alteryx | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
about 20 hours | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one project | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
over a half a million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
about 15 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
over four weeks | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Alrich | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
140 legacy models | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.91+ |
fortune 500 | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
30 years ago | DATE | 0.9+ |
F1 | EVENT | 0.89+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
over 140 legacy spreadsheet models | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Alter | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
firs | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
two double PhD statisticians | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
end | DATE | 0.82+ |
four accounting firms | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Oxford | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
TRICS | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
last 20 years | DATE | 0.66+ |
British | LOCATION | 0.66+ |
F fortune 500 | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
ultras | ORGANIZATION | 0.51+ |
dollars | QUANTITY | 0.42+ |
Alteryx Democratizing Analytics Across the Enterprise Full Episode V1b
>> It's no surprise that 73% of organizations indicate analytics spend will outpace other software investments in the next 12 to 18 months. After all as we know, data is changing the world and the world is changing with it. But is everyone's spending resulting in the same ROI? This is Lisa Martin. Welcome to "theCUBE"'s presentation of democratizing analytics across the enterprise, made possible by Alteryx. An Alteryx commissioned IDC info brief entitled, "Four Ways to Unlock Transformative Business Outcomes from Analytics Investments" found that 93% of organizations are not utilizing the analytics skills of their employees, which is creating a widening analytics gap. On this special "CUBE" presentation, Jason Klein, product marketing director of Alteryx, will join me to share key findings from the new Alteryx commissioned IDC brief and uncover how enterprises can derive more value from their data. In our second segment, we'll hear from Alan Jacobson, chief data and analytics officer at Alteryx. He's going to discuss how organizations across all industries can accelerate their analytic maturity to drive transformational business outcomes. And then in our final segment, Paula Hansen, who is the president and chief revenue officer of Alteryx, and Jacqui Van der Leij Greyling, who is the global head of tax technology at eBay, they'll join me. They're going to share how Alteryx is helping the global eCommerce company innovate with analytics. Let's get the show started. (upbeat music) Jason Klein joins me next, product marketing director at Alteryx. Jason, welcome to the program. >> Hello, nice to be here. >> Excited to talk with you. What can you tell me about the new Alteryx IDC research, which spoke with about 1500 leaders, what nuggets were in there? >> Well, as the business landscape changes over the next 12 to 18 months, we're going to see that analytics is going to be a key component to navigating this change. 73% of the orgs indicated that analytics spend will outpace other software investments. But just putting more money towards technology, it isn't going to solve everything. And this is why everyone's spending is resulting in different ROIs. And one of the reasons for this gap is because 93% of organizations, they're still not fully using the analytics skills of their employees, and this widening analytics gap, it's threatening operational progress by wasting workers' time, harming business productivity and introducing costly errors. So in this research, we developed a framework of enterprise analytics proficiency that helps organizations reap greater benefits from their investments. And we based this framework on the behaviors of organizations that saw big improvements across financial, customer, and employee metrics, and we're able to focus on the behaviors driving higher ROI. >> So the info brief also revealed that nearly all organizations are planning to increase their analytics spend. And it looks like from the info brief that nearly three quarters plan on spending more on analytics than any other software. And can you unpack, what's driving this demand, this need for analytics across organizations? >> Sure, well first there's more data than ever before, the data's changing the world, and the world is changing data. Enterprises across the world, they're accelerating digital transformation to capitalize on new opportunities, to grow revenue, to increase margins and to improve customer experiences. And analytics along with automation and AI is what's making digital transformation possible. They're providing the fuel to new digitally enabled lines of business. >> One of the things that the study also showed was that not all analytics spending is resulting in the same ROI. What are some of the discrepancies that the info brief uncovered with respect to the changes in ROI that organizations are achieving? >> Our research with IDC revealed significant roadblocks across people, processes, and technologies. They're preventing companies from reaping greater benefits from their investments. So for example, on the people side, only one out of five organizations reported a commensurate investment in upskilling for analytics and data literacy as compared to the technology itself. And next, while data is everywhere, most organizations, 63% from our survey, are still not using the full breadth of data types available. Yet data's never been this prolific, it's going to continue to grow, and orgs should be using it to their advantage. And lastly organizations, they need to provide the right analytics tools to help everyone unlock the power of data. >> So they- >> They instead rely on outdated spreadsheet technology. In our survey, nine out of 10 respondents said less than half of their knowledge workers are active users of analytics software beyond spreadsheets. But true analytic transformation can't happen for an organization in a few select pockets or silos. We believe everyone regardless of skill level should be able to participate in the data and analytics process and be driving value. >> Should we retake that, since I started talking over Jason accidentally? >> Yep, absolutely we can do so. We'll just go, yep, we'll go back to Lisa's question. Let's just, let's do the, retake the question and the answer, that'll be able to. >> It'll be not all analytics spending results in the same ROI, what are some of the discrepancies? >> Yes, Lisa, so we'll go from your ISO, just so we get that clean question and answer. >> Okay. >> Thank you for that. On your ISO, we're still speeding, Lisa, so give it a beat in your head and then on you. >> Yet not all analytics spending is resulting in the same ROI. So what are some of the discrepancies that the info brief uncovered with respect to ROI? >> Well, our research with IDC revealed significant roadblocks across people, processes, and technologies, all preventing companies from reaping greater benefits from their investments. So on the people side, for example, only one out of five organizations reported a commensurate investment in upskilling for analytics and data literacy as compared to the technology itself. And next, while data is everywhere, most organizations, 63% in our survey, are still not using the full breadth of data types available. Data has never been this prolific. It's going to continue to grow and orgs should be using it to their advantage. And lastly, organizations, they need to provide the right analytic tools to help everyone unlock the power of data, yet instead they're relying on outdated spreadsheet technology. Nine of 10 survey respondents said that less than half of their knowledge workers are active users of analytics software. True analytics transformation can't happen for an organization in a few select pockets or silos. We believe everyone regardless of skill level should be able to participate in the data and analytics process and drive value. >> So if I look at this holistically, then what would you say organizations need to do to make sure that they're really deriving value from their investments in analytics? >> Yeah, sure. So overall, the enterprises that derive more value from their data and analytics and achieve more ROI, they invested more aggressively in the four dimensions of enterprise analytics proficiency. So they've invested in the comprehensiveness of analytics across all data sources and data types, meaning they're applying analytics to everything. They've invested in the flexibility of analytics across deployment scenarios and departments, meaning they're putting analytics everywhere. They've invested in the ubiquity of analytics and insights for every skill level, meaning they're making analytics for everyone. And they've invested in the usability of analytics software, meaning they're prioritizing easy technology to accelerate analytics democratization. >> So very strategic investments. Did the survey uncover any specific areas where most companies are falling short, like any black holes that organizations need to be aware of at the outset? >> It did, it did. So organizations, they need to build a data-centric culture. And this begins with people. But what the survey told us is that the people aspect of analytics is the most heavily skewed towards low proficiency. In order to maximize ROI, organizations need to make sure everyone in the organization has access to the data and analytics technology they need. And then the organizations also have to align their investments with upskilling in data literacy to enjoy that higher ROI. Companies who did so experience higher ROI than companies who underinvested in analytics literacy. So among the high ROI achievers, 78% have a good or great alignment between analytics investment and workforce upskilling compared to only 64% among those without positive ROI. And as more orgs adopt cloud data warehouses or cloud data lakes, in order to manage the massively increasing workloads- Can I start that one over. >> Sure. >> Can I redo this one? >> Yeah. >> Of course, stand by. >> Tongue tied. >> Yep, no worries. >> One second. >> If we could do the same, Lisa, just have a clean break, we'll go your question. >> Yep, yeah. >> On you Lisa. Just give that a count and whenever you're ready. Here, I'm going to give us a little break. On you Lisa. >> So are there any specific areas that the survey uncovered where most companies are falling short? Like any black holes organizations need to be aware of from the outset? >> It did. You need to build a data-centric culture and this begins with people, but we found that the people aspect of analytics is most heavily skewed towards low proficiency. In order to maximize ROI organizations need to make sure everyone has access to the data and analytics technology they need. Organizations that align their analytics investments with upskilling enjoy higher ROI than orgs that are less aligned. For example, among the high ROI achievers in our survey, 78% had good or great alignment between analytics investments and workforce upskilling, compared to only 64% among those without positive ROI. And as more enterprises adopt cloud data warehouses or cloud data lakes to manage increasingly massive data sets, analytics needs to exist everywhere, especially for those cloud environments. And what we found is organizations that use more data types and more data sources generate higher ROI from their analytics investments. Among those with improved customer metrics, 90% were good or great at utilizing all data sources, compared to only 67% among the ROI laggards. >> So interesting that you mentioned people, I'm glad that you mentioned people. Data scientists, everybody talks about data scientists. They're in high demand, we know that, but there aren't enough to meet the needs of all enterprises. So given that discrepancy, how can organizations fill the gap and really maximize the investments that they're making in analytics? >> Right, so analytics democratization, it's no longer optional, but it doesn't have to be complex. So we at Alteryx, we're democratizing analytics by empowering every organization to upskill every worker into a data worker. And the data from this survey shows this is the optimal approach. Organizations with a higher percentage of knowledge workers who are actively using analytics software enjoy higher returns from their analytics investment than orgs still stuck on spreadsheets. Among those with improved financial metrics, AKA the high ROI achievers, nearly 70% say that at least a quarter of their knowledge workers are using analytics software other than spreadsheets compared to only 56% in the low ROI group. Also among the high ROI performers, 63% said data and analytic workers collaborate well or extremely well compared to only 51% in the low ROI group. The data from the survey shows that supporting more business domains with analytics and providing cross-functional analytics correlates with higher ROI. So to maximize ROI, orgs should be transitioning workers from spreadsheets to analytics software. They should be letting them collaborate effectively and letting them do so cross-functionally. >> Yeah, that cross-functional collaboration is essential for anyone in any organization and in any discipline. Another key thing that jumped out from the survey was around shadow IT. The business side is using more data science tools than the IT side. And it's expected to spend more on analytics than other IT. What risks does this present to the overall organization, if IT and the lines of business guys and gals aren't really aligned? >> Well, there needs to be better collaboration and alignment between IT and the line of business. The data from the survey, however, shows that business managers, they're expected to spend more on analytics and use more analytics tools than IT is aware of. And this isn't because the lines of business have recognized the value of analytics and plan to invest accordingly, but a lack of alignment between IT and business. This will negatively impact governance, which ultimately impedes democratization and hence ROI. >> So Jason, where can organizations that are maybe at the outset of their analytics journey, or maybe they're in environments where there's multiple analytics tools across shadow IT, where can they go to Alteryx to learn more about how they can really simplify, streamline, and dial up the value on their investment? >> Well, they can learn more on our website. I also encourage them to explore the Alteryx community, which has lots of best practices, not just in terms of how you do the analytics, but how you stand up in Alteryx environment, but also to take a look at your analytics stack and prioritize technologies that can snap to and enhance your organization's governance posture. It doesn't have to change it, but it should be able to align to and enhance it. >> And of course, as you mentioned, it's about people, process, and technologies. Jason, thank you so much for joining me today, unpacking the IDC info brief and the great nuggets in there. Lots that organizations can learn and really become empowered to maximize their analytics investments. We appreciate your time. >> Thank you, it's been a pleasure. >> In a moment, Alan Jacobson, who's the chief data and analytics officer at Alteryx is going to join me. He's going to be here to talk about how organizations across all industries can accelerate their analytic maturity to drive transformational business outcomes. You're watching "theCUBE", the leader in tech enterprise coverage. >> Somehow many have come to believe that data analytics is for the few, for the scientists, the PhDs, the MBAs. Well, it is for them, but that's not all. You don't have to have an advanced degree to do amazing things with data. You don't even have to be a numbers person. You can be just about anything. A titan of industry or a future titan of industry. You could be working to change the world, your neighborhood, or the course of your business. You can be saving lives or just looking to save a little time. The power of data analytics shouldn't be limited to certain job titles or industries or organizations because when more people are doing more things with data, more incredible things happen. Analytics makes us smarter and faster and better at what we do. It's practically a superpower. That's why we believe analytics is for everyone, and everything, and should be everywhere. That's why we believe in analytics for all. (upbeat music) >> Hey, everyone. Welcome back to "Accelerating Analytics Maturity". I'm your host, Lisa Martin. Alan Jacobson joins me next. The chief of data and analytics officer at Alteryx. Alan, it's great to have you on the program. >> Thanks, Lisa. >> So Alan, as we know, everyone knows that being data driven is very important. It's a household term these days, but 93% of organizations are not utilizing the analytics skills of their employees, which is creating a widening analytics gap. What's your advice, your recommendations for organizations who are just starting out with analytics? >> You're spot on, many organizations really aren't leveraging the full capability of their knowledge workers. And really the first step is probably assessing where you are on the journey, whether that's you personally, or your organization as a whole. We just launched an assessment tool on our website that we built with the International Institute of Analytics, that in a very short period of time, in about 15 minutes, you can go on and answer some questions and understand where you sit versus your peer set versus competitors and kind of where you are on the journey. >> So when people talk about data analytics, they often think, ah, this is for data science experts like people like you. So why should people in the lines of business like the finance folks, the marketing folks, why should they learn analytics? >> So domain experts are really in the best position. They know where the gold is buried in their companies. They know where the inefficiencies are. And it is so much easier and faster to teach a domain expert a bit about how to automate a process or how to use analytics than it is to take a data scientist and try to teach them to have the knowledge of a 20 year accounting professional or a logistics expert of your company. Much harder to do that. And really, if you think about it, the world has changed dramatically in a very short period of time. If you were a marketing professional 30 years ago, you likely didn't need to know anything about the internet, but today, do you know what you would call that marketing professional if they didn't know anything about the internet, probably unemployed or retired. And so knowledge workers are having to learn more and more skills to really keep up with their professions. And analytics is really no exception. Pretty much in every profession, people are needing to learn analytics to stay current and be capable for their companies. And companies need people who can do that. >> Absolutely, it seems like it's table stakes these days. Let's look at different industries now. Are there differences in how you see analytics in automation being employed in different industries? I know Alteryx is being used across a lot of different types of organizations from government to retail. I also see you're now with some of the leading sports teams. Any differences in industries? >> Yeah, there's an incredible actually commonality between the domains industry to industry. So if you look at what an HR professional is doing, maybe attrition analysis, it's probably quite similar, whether they're in oil and gas or in a high tech software company. And so really the similarities are much larger than you might think. And even on the sports front, we see many of the analytics that sports teams perform are very similar. So McLaren is one of the great partners that we work with and they use Alteryx across many areas of their business from finance to production, extreme sports, logistics, wind tunnel engineering, the marketing team analyzes social media data, all using Alteryx, and if I take as an example, the finance team, the finance team is trying to optimize the budget to make sure that they can hit the very stringent targets that F1 Sports has, and I don't see a ton of difference between the optimization that they're doing to hit their budget numbers and what I see Fortune 500 finance departments doing to optimize their budget, and so really the commonality is very high, even across industries. >> I bet every Fortune 500 or even every company would love to be compared to the same department within McLaren F1. Just to know that wow, what they're doing is so incredibly important as is what we're doing. >> So talk- >> Absolutely. >> About lessons learned, what lessons can business leaders take from those organizations like McLaren, who are the most analytically mature? >> Probably first and foremost, is that the ROI with analytics and automation is incredibly high. Companies are having a ton of success. It's becoming an existential threat to some degree, if your company isn't going on this journey and your competition is, it can be a huge problem. IDC just did a recent study about how companies are unlocking the ROI using analytics. And the data was really clear, organizations that have a higher percentage of their workforce using analytics are enjoying a much higher return from their analytic investment, and so it's not about hiring two double PhD statisticians from Oxford. It really is how widely you can bring your workforce on this journey, can they all get 10% more capable? And that's having incredible results at businesses all over the world. An another key finding that they had is that the majority of them said that when they had many folks using analytics, they were going on the journey faster than companies that didn't. And so picking technologies that'll help everyone do this and do this fast and do it easily. Having an approachable piece of software that everyone can use is really a key. >> So faster, able to move faster, higher ROI. I also imagine analytics across the organization is a big competitive advantage for organizations in any industry. >> Absolutely the IDC, or not the IDC, the International Institute of Analytics showed huge correlation between companies that were more analytically mature versus ones that were not. They showed correlation to growth of the company, they showed correlation to revenue and they showed correlation to shareholder values. So across really all of the key measures of business, the more analytically mature companies simply outperformed their competition. >> And that's key these days, is to be able to outperform your competition. You know, one of the things that we hear so often, Alan, is people talking about democratizing data and analytics. You talked about the line of business workers, but I got to ask you, is it really that easy for the line of business workers who aren't trained in data science to be able to jump in, look at data, uncover and extract business insights to make decisions? >> So in many ways, it really is that easy. I have a 14 and 16 year old kid. Both of them have learned Alteryx, they're Alteryx certified and it was quite easy. It took 'em about 20 hours and they were off to the races, but there can be some hard parts. The hard parts have more to do with change management. I mean, if you're an accountant that's been doing the best accounting work in your company for the last 20 years, and all you happen to know is a spreadsheet for those 20 years, are you ready to learn some new skills? And I would suggest you probably need to, if you want to keep up with your profession. The big four accounting firms have trained over a hundred thousand people in Alteryx. Just one firm has trained over a hundred thousand. You can't be an accountant or an auditor at some of these places without knowing Alteryx. And so the hard part, really in the end, isn't the technology and learning analytics and data science, the harder part is this change management, change is hard. I should probably eat better and exercise more, but it's hard to always do that. And so companies are finding that that's the hard part. They need to help people go on the journey, help people with the change management to help them become the digitally enabled accountant of the future, the logistics professional that is E enabled, that's the challenge. >> That's a huge challenge. Cultural shift is a challenge, as you said, change management. How do you advise customers if you might be talking with someone who might be early in their analytics journey, but really need to get up to speed and mature to be competitive, how do you guide them or give them recommendations on being able to facilitate that change management? >> Yeah, that's a great question. So people entering into the workforce today, many of them are starting to have these skills. Alteryx is used in over 800 universities around the globe to teach finance and to teach marketing and to teach logistics. And so some of this is happening naturally as new workers are entering the workforce, but for all of those who are already in the workforce, have already started their careers, learning in place becomes really important. And so we work with companies to put on programmatic approaches to help their workers do this. And so it's, again, not simply putting a box of tools in the corner and saying free, take one. We put on hackathons and analytic days, and it can be great fun. We have a great time with many of the customers that we work with, helping them do this, helping them go on the journey, and the ROI, as I said, is fantastic. And not only does it sometimes affect the bottom line, it can really make societal changes. We've seen companies have breakthroughs that have really made great impact to society as a whole. >> Isn't that so fantastic, to see the difference that that can make. It sounds like you guys are doing a great job of democratizing access to Alteryx to everybody. We talked about the line of business folks and the incredible importance of enabling them and the ROI, the speed, the competitive advantage. Can you share some specific examples that you think of Alteryx customers that really show data breakthroughs by the lines of business using the technology? >> Yeah, absolutely, so many to choose from. I'll give you two examples quickly. One is Armor Express. They manufacture life saving equipment, defensive equipments, like armor plated vests, and they were needing to optimize their supply chain, like many companies through the pandemic. We see how important the supply chain is. And so adjusting supply to match demand is really vital. And so they've used Alteryx to model some of their supply and demand signals and built a predictive model to optimize the supply chain. And it certainly helped out from a dollar standpoint. They cut over a half a million dollars of inventory in the first year, but more importantly, by matching that demand and supply signal, you're able to better meet customer demand. And so when people have orders and are looking to pick up a vest, they don't want to wait. And it becomes really important to get that right. Another great example is British Telecom. They're a company that services the public sector. They have very strict reporting regulations that they have to meet and they had, and this is crazy to think about, over 140 legacy spreadsheet models that they had to run to comply with these regulatory processes and report, and obviously running 140 legacy models that had to be done in a certain order and length, incredibly challenging. It took them over four weeks each time that they had to go through that process. And so to save time and have more efficiency in doing that, they trained 50 employees over just a two week period to start using Alteryx and learn Alteryx. And they implemented an all new reporting process that saw a 75% reduction in the number of man hours it took to run in a 60% run time performance. And so, again, a huge improvement. I can imagine it probably had better quality as well, because now that it was automated, you don't have people copying and pasting data into a spreadsheet. And that was just one project that this group of folks were able to accomplish that had huge ROI, but now those people are moving on and automating other processes and performing analytics in other areas. So you can imagine the impact by the end of the year that they will have on their business, potentially millions upon millions of dollars. And this is what we see again and again, company after company, government agency after government agency, is how analytics are really transforming the way work is being done. >> That was the word that came to mind when you were describing the all three customer examples, transformation, this is transformative. The ability to leverage Alteryx, to truly democratize data and analytics, give access to the lines of business is transformative for every organization. And also the business outcome you mentioned, those are substantial metrics based business outcomes. So the ROI in leveraging a technology like Alteryx seems to be right there, sitting in front of you. >> That's right, and to be honest, it's not only important for these businesses. It's important for the knowledge workers themselves. I mean, we hear it from people that they discover Alteryx, they automate a process, they finally get to get home for dinner with their families, which is fantastic, but it leads to new career paths. And so knowledge workers that have these added skills have so much larger opportunity. And I think it's great when the needs of businesses to become more analytic and automate processes actually matches the needs of the employees, and they too want to learn these skills and become more advanced in their capabilities. >> Huge value there for the business, for the employees themselves to expand their skillset, to really open up so many opportunities for not only the business to meet the demands of the demanding customer, but the employees to be able to really have that breadth and depth in their field of service. Great opportunities there, Alan. Is there anywhere that you want to point the audience to go to learn more about how they can get started? >> Yeah, so one of the things that we're really excited about is how fast and easy it is to learn these tools. So any of the listeners who want to experience Alteryx, they can go to the website, there's a free download on the website. You can take our analytic maturity assessment, as we talked about at the beginning, and see where you are on the journey and just reach out. We'd love to work with you and your organization to see how we can help you accelerate your journey on analytics and automation. >> Alan, it was a pleasure talking to you about democratizing data and analytics, the power in it for organizations across every industry. We appreciate your insights and your time. >> Thank you so much. >> In a moment, Paula Hansen, who is the president and chief revenue officer of Alteryx, and Jacqui Van der Leij Greyling, who's the global head of tax technology at eBay, will join me. You're watching "theCUBE", the leader in high tech enterprise coverage. >> 1200 hours of wind tunnel testing, 30 million race simulations, 2.4 second pit stops. >> Make that 2.3. >> Sector times out the wazoo. >> Way too much of this. >> Velocities, pressures, temperatures, 80,000 components generating 11.8 billion data points and one analytics platform to make sense of it all. When McLaren needs to turn complex data into winning insights, they turn to Alteryx. Alteryx, analytics automation. (upbeat music) >> Hey, everyone, welcome back to the program. Lisa Martin here, I've got two guests joining me. Please welcome back to "theCUBE" Paula Hansen, the chief revenue officer and president at Alteryx, and Jacqui Van der Leij Greyling joins us as well, the global head of tax technology at eBay. They're going to share with you how Alteryx is helping eBay innovate with analytics. Ladies, welcome, it's great to have you both on the program. >> Thank you, Lisa, it's great to be here. >> Yeah, Paula, we're going to start with you. In this program, we've heard from Jason Klein, we've heard from Alan Jacobson. They talked about the need to democratize analytics across any organization to really drive innovation. With analytics, as they talked about, at the forefront of software investments, how's Alteryx helping its customers to develop roadmaps for success with analytics? >> Well, thank you, Lisa. It absolutely is about our customers' success. And we partner really closely with our customers to develop a holistic approach to their analytics success. And it starts of course with our innovative technology and platform, but ultimately we help our customers to create a culture of data literacy and analytics from the top of the organization, starting with the C-suite. And we partner with our customers to build their roadmaps for scaling that culture of analytics, through things like enablement programs, skills assessments, hackathons, setting up centers of excellence to help their organization scale and drive governance of this analytics capability across the enterprise. So at the end of the day, it's really about helping our customers to move up their analytics maturity curve with proven technologies and best practices, so they can make better business decisions and compete in their respective industries. >> Excellent, sounds like a very strategic program, we're going to unpack that. Jacqui, let's bring you into the conversation. Speaking of analytics maturity, one of the things that we talked about in this event is the IDC report that showed that 93% of organizations are not utilizing the analytics skills of their employees, but then there's eBay. How Jacqui did eBay become one of the 7% of organizations who's really maturing and how are you using analytics across the organization at eBay? >> So I think the main thing for us is when we started out was is that, our, especially in finance, they became spreadsheet professionals instead of the things that we really want our employees to add value to. And we realized we had to address that. And we also knew we couldn't wait for all our data to be centralized until we actually start using the data or start automating and being more effective. So ultimately we really started very, very actively embedding analytics in our people and our data and our processes. >> Starting with people is really critical. Jacqui, continuing with you, what were some of the roadblocks to analytics adoption that you faced and how did you overcome them? >> So I think eBay is a very data driven company. We have a lot of data. I think we are 27 years around this year, so we have the data, but it is everywhere. And how do you use that data? How do you use it efficiently? How do you get to the data? And I believe that that is definitely one of our biggest roadblocks when we started out and just finding those data sources and finding ways to connect to them to move forward. The other thing is that people were experiencing a lot of frustration. I mentioned before about the spreadsheet professionals. And there was no, we were not independent. You couldn't move forward, you would've put it on somebody else's roadmap to get the data and to get the information if you want it. So really finding something that everybody could access analytics or access data. And finally we have to realize is that this is uncharted territory. This is not exactly something that everybody is used to working with every day. So how do you find something that is easy, and that is not so daunting on somebody who's brand new to the field? And I would call those out as your major roadblocks, because you always have, not always, but most of the times you have support from the top, and in our case we have, but at the end of the day, it's our people that need to actually really embrace it, and making that accessible for them, I would say is definitely not per se, a roadblock, but basically a block you want to be able to move. >> It's really all about putting people first. Question for both of you, and Paula we'll start with you, and then Jacqui we'll go to you. I think the message in this program that the audience is watching with us is very clear. Analytics is for everyone, should be for everyone. Let's talk now about how both of your organizations are empowering people, those in the organization that may not have technical expertise to be able to leverage data, so that they can actually be data driven. Paula. >> Yes, well, we leverage our platform across all of our business functions here at Alteryx. And just like Jacqui explained, at eBay finance is probably one of the best examples of how we leverage our own platform to improve our business performance. So just like Jacqui mentioned, we have this huge amount of data flowing through our enterprise and the opportunity to leverage that into insights and analytics is really endless. So our CFO Kevin Rubin has been a key sponsor for using our own technology. We use Alteryx for forecasting all of our key performance metrics, for business planning, across our audit function, to help with compliance and regulatory requirements, tax, and even to close our books at the end of each quarter. So it's really going to remain across our business. And at the end of the day, it comes to how do you train users? How do you engage users to lean into this analytic opportunity to discover use cases? And so one of the other things that we've seen many companies do is to gamify that process, to build a game that brings users into the experience for training and to work with each other, to problem solve and along the way, maybe earn badges depending on the capabilities and trainings that they take. And just have a little healthy competition as an employee base around who can become more sophisticated in their analytic capability. So I think there's a lot of different ways to do it. And as Jacqui mentioned, it's really about ensuring that people feel comfortable, that they feel supported, that they have access to the training that they need, and ultimately that they are given both the skills and the confidence to be able to be a part of this great opportunity of analytics. >> That confidence is key. Jacqui, talk about some of the ways that you're empowering folks without that technical expertise to really be data driven. >> Yeah, I think it means to what Paula has said in terms of getting people excited about it, but it's also understanding that this is a journey and everybody is at a different place in their journey. You have folks that's already really advanced who has done this every day. And then you have really some folks that this is brand new or maybe somewhere in between. And it's about how you get everybody in their different phases to get to the initial destination. I say initial, because I believe a journey is never really complete. What we have done is that we decided to invest, and built a proof of concept, and we got our CFO to sponsor a hackathon. We opened it up to everybody in finance in the middle of the pandemic. So everybody was on Zoom and we told people, listen, we're going to teach you this tool, it's super easy, and let's just see what you can do. We ended up having 70 entries. We had only three weeks. So and these are people that do not have a background. They are not engineers, they're not data scientists. And we ended up with a 25,000 hour savings at the end of that hackathon from the 70 entries with people that have never, ever done anything like this before. And there you have the result. And then it just went from there. People had a proof of concept. They knew that it worked and they overcame the initial barrier of change. And that's where we are seeing things really, really picking up now. >> That's fantastic. And the business outcome that you mentioned there, the business impact is massive, helping folks get that confidence to be able to overcome sometimes the cultural barriers is key here. I think another thing that this program has really highlighted is there is a clear demand for data literacy in the job market, regardless of organization. Can each of you share more about how you're empowering the next generation of data workers? Paula, we'll start with you. >> Absolutely, and Jacqui says it so well, which is that it really is a journey that organizations are on and we as people in society are on in terms of upskilling our capabilities. So one of the things that we're doing here at Alteryx to help address this skillset gap on a global level is through a program that we call SparkED, which is essentially a no-cost analytics education program that we take to universities and colleges globally to help build the next generation of data workers. When we talk to our customers like eBay and many others, they say that it's difficult to find the skills that they want when they're hiring people into the job market. And so this program's really developed just to do just that, to close that gap and to work hand in hand with students and educators to improve data literacy for the next generation. So we're just getting started with SparkED. We started last May, but we currently have over 850 educational institutions globally engaged across 47 countries, and we're going to continue to invest here because there's so much opportunity for people, for society and for enterprises, when we close the gap and empower more people with the necessary analytics skills to solve all the problems that data can help solve. >> So SparkED has made a really big impact in such a short time period. It's going to be fun to watch the progress of that. Jacqui, let's go over to you now. Talk about some of the things that eBay is doing to empower the next generation of data workers. >> So we basically wanted to make sure that we kept that momentum from the hackathon, that we don't lose that excitement. So we just launched the program called eBay Masterminds. And what it basically is, is it's an inclusive innovation in each other, where we firmly believe that innovation is for upskilling for all analytics roles. So it doesn't matter your background, doesn't matter which function you are in, come and participate in in this where we really focus on innovation, introducing new technologies and upskilling our people. We are, apart from that, we also said, well, we shouldn't just keep it to inside eBay. We have to share this innovation with the community. So we are actually working on developing an analytics high school program, which we hope to pilot by the end of this year, where we will actually have high schoolers come in and teach them data essentials, the soft skills around analytics, but also how to use Alteryx. And we're working with, actually, we're working with SparkED and they're helping us develop that program. And we really hope that at, say, by the end of the year, we have a pilot and then also next year, we want to roll it out in multiple locations in multiple countries and really, really focus on that whole concept of analytics for all. >> Analytics for all, sounds like Alteryx and eBay have a great synergistic relationship there that is jointly aimed at especially going down the stuff and getting people when they're younger interested, and understanding how they can be empowered with data across any industry. Paula, let's go back to you, you were recently on "theCUBE"'s Supercloud event just a couple of weeks ago. And you talked about the challenges the companies are facing as they're navigating what is by default a multi-cloud world. How does the Alteryx Analytics Cloud platform enable CIOs to democratize analytics across their organization? >> Yes, business leaders and CIOs across all industries are realizing that there just aren't enough data scientists in the world to be able to make sense of the massive amounts of data that are flowing through organizations. Last I checked, there was 2 million data scientists in the world, so that's woefully underrepresented in terms of the opportunity for people to be a part of the analytics solution. So what we're seeing now with CIOs, with business leaders is that they're integrating data analysis and the skillset of data analysis into virtually every job function, and that is what we think of when we think of analytics for all. And so our mission with Alteryx Analytics Cloud is to empower all of those people in every job function, regardless of their skillset, as Jacqui pointed out from people that are just getting started all the way to the most sophisticated of technical users. Every worker across that spectrum can have a meaningful role in the opportunity to unlock the potential of the data for their company and their organizations. So that's our goal with Alteryx Analytics Cloud, and it operates in a multi cloud world and really helps across all sizes of data sets to blend, cleanse, shape, analyze, and report out so that we can break down data silos across the enterprise and help drive real business outcomes as a result of unlocking the potential of data. >> As well as really lessening that skill gap. As you were saying, there's only 2 million data scientists. You don't need to be a data scientist, that's the beauty of what Alteryx is enabling and eBay is a great example of that. Jacqui, let's go ahead and wrap things with you. You talked a great deal about the analytics maturity that you have fostered at eBay. It obviously has the right culture to adapt to that. Can you talk a little bit and take us out here in terms of where Alteryx fits in as that analytics maturity journey continues and what are some of the things that you are most excited about as analytics truly gets democratized across eBay? >> When we're starting up and getting excited about things when it comes to analytics, I can go on all day, but I'll keep it short and sweet for you. I do think we are on the top of the pool of data scientists. And I really feel that that is your next step, for us anyways, is that how do we get folks to not see data scientists as this big thing, like a rocket scientist, it's something completely different. And it's something that is in everybody in a certain extent. So again, partnering with Alteryx who just released the AI ML solution, allowing folks to not have a data scientist program, but actually build models and be able to solve problems that way. So we have engaged with Alteryx and we purchased the licenses, quite a few. And right now through our Masterminds program, we're actually running a four month program for all skill levels, teaching them AI ML and machine learning and how they can build their own models. We are really excited about that. We have over 50 participants without a background from all over the organization. We have members from our customer services. We have even some of our engineers are actually participating in the program. We just kicked it off. And I really believe that that is our next step. I want to give you a quick example of the beauty of this is where we actually just allow people to go out and think about ideas and come up with things. And one of the people in our team who doesn't have a data scientist background at all, was able to develop a solution where there is a checkout feedback functionality on the eBay side where sellers or buyers can verbatim add information. And she built a model to be able to determine what relates to tax specific, what is the type of problem, and even predict how that problem can be solved before we as a human even step in, and now instead of us or somebody going to verbatim and try to figure out what's going on there, we can focus on fixing the error versus actually just reading through things and not adding any value, and it's a beautiful tool and I was very impressed when I saw the demo and definitely developing that sort of thing. >> That sounds fantastic. And I think just the one word that keeps coming to mind, and we've said this a number of times in the program today is empowerment. What you're actually really doing to truly empower people across the organization with varying degrees of skill level, going down to the high school level, really exciting. We'll have to stay tuned to see what some of the great things are that come from this continued partnership. Ladies, I want to thank you so much for joining me on the program today and talking about how Alteryx and eBay are really partnering together to democratize analytics and to facilitate its maturity. It's been great talking to you. >> Thank you, Lisa. >> Thank you so much. (cheerful electronic music) >> As you heard over the course of our program, organizations where more people are using analytics who have deeper capabilities in each of the four Es, that's everyone, everything, everywhere, and easy analytics, those organizations achieve more ROI from their respective investments in analytics and automation than those who don't. We also heard a great story from eBay, great example of an enterprise that is truly democratizing analytics across its organization. It's enabling and empowering line of business users to use analytics, not only focused on key aspects of their job, but develop new skills rather than doing the same repetitive tasks. We want to thank you so much for watching the program today. Remember you can find all of the content on thecube.net. You can find all of the news from today on siliconangle.com and of course alteryx.com. We also want to thank Alteryx for making this program possible and for sponsoring "theCUBE". For all of my guests, I'm Lisa Martin. We want to thank you for watching and bye for now. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
in the next 12 to 18 months. Excited to talk with you. over the next 12 to 18 months, And it looks like from the info brief and the world is changing data. that the info brief uncovered with respect So for example, on the people side, in the data and analytics and the answer, that'll be able to. just so we get that clean Thank you for that. that the info brief uncovered as compared to the technology itself. So overall, the enterprises to be aware of at the outset? is that the people aspect of analytics If we could do the same, Lisa, Here, I'm going to give us a little break. to the data and analytics and really maximize the investments And the data from this survey shows this And it's expected to spend more and plan to invest accordingly, that can snap to and the great nuggets in there. Alteryx is going to join me. that data analytics is for the few, Alan, it's great to that being data driven is very important. And really the first step the lines of business and more skills to really keep of the leading sports teams. between the domains industry to industry. to be compared to the same is that the majority of them said So faster, able to So across really all of the is to be able to outperform that is E enabled, that's the challenge. and mature to be competitive, around the globe to teach finance and the ROI, the speed, that they had to run to comply And also the business of the employees, and they of the demanding customer, to see how we can help you the power in it for organizations and Jacqui Van der Leij 1200 hours of wind tunnel testing, to make sense of it all. back to the program. going to start with you. So at the end of the day, one of the 7% of organizations to be centralized until we of the roadblocks to analytics adoption and to get the information if you want it. that the audience is watching and the confidence to be able to be a part to really be data driven. in their different phases to And the business outcome and to work hand in hand Jacqui, let's go over to you now. We have to share this Paula, let's go back to in the opportunity to unlock and eBay is a great example of that. and be able to solve problems that way. that keeps coming to mind, Thank you so much. in each of the four Es,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jacqui | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paula | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jason Klein | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paula Hansen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paula Hansen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan Jacobson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alteryx | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eBay | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jason | PERSON | 0.99+ |
International Institute of Analytics | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan Jacobson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
60% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kevin Rubin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jacqui Van der Leij Greyling | PERSON | 0.99+ |
14 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
International Institute of Analytics | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
63% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
93% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
70 entries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
16 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1200 hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chris Degnan, Snowflake & Chris Grusz, Amazon Web Services | Snowflake Summit 2022
(upbeat techno music) >> Hey everyone, and welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of Snowflake Summit '22 live from Caesar's Forum in beautiful, warm, and sunny Las Vegas. I'm Lisa Martin. I got the Chris and Chris show, next. Bear with me. Chris Degnan joins us again. One of our alumni, the Chief Revenue Officer at Snowflake. Good to have you back, Chris. >> Thank you for having us. >> Lisa: Chris Grusz also joins us. Director of Business Development AWS Marketplace and Service Catalog at AWS. Chris and Chris, welcome. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. Good to be back in person. >> Isn't it great. >> Chris G: It's so much better. >> Chris D: Yeah. >> Nothing like it. So let's talk. There's been so much momentum, Chris D, at Snowflake the last few years. I mean the momentum at this show since we launched yesterday, I know you guys launched the day before with partners, has been amazing. A lot of change, and it's like this for Snowflake. Talk to us about AWS working together with Snowflake and some of the benefits in it from your customer. And then Chris G, I'll go to you for the same question. >> Chris G: Yep. >> You know, first of all, it's awesome. Like, I just, you know, it's been three years since I've had a Snowflake Summit in person, and it's crazy to see the growth that we've seen. You know, I can't, our first cloud that we ever launched on top of was, was AWS, and AWS is our largest cloud, you know, in in terms of revenue today. And they've been, they just kind of know how to do it right. And they've been a wonderful partner all along. There's been challenges, and we've kind of leaned in together and figured out ways to work together, you know, and to solve those challenges. So, been a wonderful partnership. >> And talk about it, Chris G, from your perspective obviously from a coopetition perspective. >> Yep. >> AWS has databases, cloud data forms. >> Chris G: Yeah. >> Talk to us about it. What was the impetus for the partnership with Snowflake from AWS's standpoint? >> Yeah, well first and foremost, they're building on top of AWS. And so that, by default, makes them a great partner. And it's interesting, Chris and I have been working together for, gosh, seven years now? And the relationship's come a really long way. You know, when we first started off, we were trying to sort out how we were going to work together, when we were competing, and when we're working together. And, you know, you fast forward to today, and it's just such a good relationship. Because both companies work backwards from customers. And so that's, you know, kind of in both of our DNA. And so if the customer makes that selection, we're going to support them, even from an AWS perspective. When they're going with Snowflake, that's still a really good thing for AWS, 'cause there's a lot of associated services that Snowflake either integrates to, or we're integrating to them. And so, it's really kind of contributed to how we can really work together in a co-sell motion. >> Talk to us, talk about that. The joint GOTO market and the co-selling motion from Snowflake's perspective, how do customers get engaged? >> Well, I think, you know, typically we, where we are really good at co-selling together is we identify on premise systems. So whether it's, you know, some Legacy UDP system, some Legacy database solution, and they want to move to the cloud? You know, Amazon is all in on getting everyone to the cloud. And I think that's their approach they've taken with us is saying we're really good at accelerating that adoption and moving all these, you know, massive workloads into the cloud. And then to Chris's point, you know, we've integrated so nicely into things like SageMaker and other tool sets. And we, we even have exciting scenarios where they've allowed us to use, you know, some of their Amazon.com retail data sets that we actually use in data sharing via the partnership. So we continue to find unique ways to partner with our great friends at Amazon. >> Sounds like a very deep partnership. >> Chris D: Yeah. Absolutely. >> Chris G: Oh, absolutely, yeah. We're integrating into Snowflake, and they're integrating to AWS. And so it just provides a great combined experience for our customers. And again, that's kind of what we're both looking forward from both of our organizations. >> That customer centricity is, >> Yeah. >> is I think the center of the flywheel that is both that both of you, your companies have. Chris D, talk about the the industry's solutions, specific, industry-specific solutions that Snowflake and AWS have. I know we talked yesterday about the pivot from a sales perspective >> Chris D: Yes. >> That snowflake made in recent months. Talk to us about the industries that you are help, really targeting with AWS to help customers solve problems. >> Yeah. I think there's, you know, we're focused on a number of industries. I think, you know, some of the examples, like I said, I gave you the example of we're using data sharing to help the retail space. And I think it's a really good partnership. Because some of the, some companies view Amazon as a competitor in the retail space, and I think we kind of soften that blow. And we actually leverage some of the Amazon.com data sets. And this is where the partnership's been really strong. In the healthcare space, in the life sciences space, we have customers like Anthem, where we're really focused on helping actually Anthem solve real business problems. Not necessarily like technical problems. It's like, oh no, they want to get, you know, figure out how they can get the whole customer and take care of their whole customer, and get them using the Anthem platform more effectively. So there's a really great, wonderful partnership there. >> We've heard a lot in the last day and a half on theCUBE from a lot of retail customers and partners. There seems to be a lot of growth in that. So there's so much change in the retail market. I was just talking with Click and Snowflake about Urban Outfitters, as an example. And you think of how what these companies are doing together and obviously AWS and Snowflake, helping companies not just pivot during the pandemic, but really survive. I mean, in the beginning with, you know, retail that didn't have a digital presence, what were they going to do? And then the supply chain issues. So it really seems to be what Snowflake and its partner Ecosystem is doing, is helping companies now, obviously, thrive. But it was really kind of like a no-go sort of situation for a lot of industries. >> Yeah, and I think the neat part of, you know, both the combined, you know, Snowflake and AWS solution is in, a good example is DoorDash, you know. They had hyper growth, and they could not have handled, especially during COVID, as we all know. We all used DoorDash, right? We were just talking about it. Chipotle, like, you know, like (laughter) and I think they were able to really take advantage of our hyper elastic platforms, both on the Amazon side and the Snowflake side to scale their business and meet the high demand that they were seeing. And that's kind of some of the great examples of where we've enabled customer growth to really accelerate. >> Yeah. Yeah, right. And I'd add to that, you know, while we saw good growth for those types of companies, a lot of your traditional companies saw a ton of benefit as well. Like another good example, and it's been talked about here at the show, is Western Union, right? So they're a company that's been around for a long time. They do cross border payments and cross currency, you know, exchanges, and, you know, like a lot of companies that have been around for a while, they have data all over the place. And so they started to look at that, and that became an inhibitor to their growth. 'Cause they couldn't get a full view of what was actually going on. And so they did a lengthy evaluation, and they ended up going with Snowflake. And, it was great, 'cause it provided a lot of immediate benefits, so first of all, they were able to take all those disparate systems and pull that into Snowflake. So they finally had a single source of the truth, which was lacking before that. So that was one of the big benefits. The second benefit, and Chris has mentioned this a couple times, is the fact that they could use data sharing. And so now they could pull in third data. And now that they had a holistic view of their entire data set, they could pull in that third party data, and now they could get insights that they never could get before. And so that was another large benefit. And then the third part, and this is where the relationship between AWS and Snowflake is great, is they could then use Amazon SageMaker. So one of the decisions that Western Union made a long time ago is they use R for their data science platform, and SageMaker supports R. And so it really allowed them to dovetail the skill sets that they had around data science into SageMaker. They could now look across all of Snowflake. And so that was just a really good benefit. And so it drove the cost down for Western Union which was a big benefit, but the even bigger benefit is they were now able to start to package and promote different solutions to their customers. So they were effectively able to monetize all the data that they were now getting and the information they were getting out of Snowflake. And then of course, once it was in there, they could also use things like Tableau or ThoughtSpot, both of which available in AWS Marketplace. And it allowed them to get all kinds of visualization of data that they never got in the past. >> The monetization piece is, is interesting. It's so challenging for organizations, one, to get that single source view, to be able to have a customer 360, but to also then be able to monetize data. When you're in customer conversations, how do you help customers on that journey, start? Because the, their competitors are clearly right behind them, ready to take first place spot. How do you help customers go, all right this is what we're going to do to help you on this journey with AWS to monetize your data? >> I think, you know, it's everything from, you know, looking at removing the silos of data. So one of the challenges they've had is they have these Legacy systems, and a lot of times they don't want to just take the Legacy systems and throw them into the cloud. They want to say, we need a holistic view of our customer, 360 view of our customer data. And then they're saying, hey, how can we actually monetize that data? That's where we do everything from, you know, Snowflake has the data marketplace where we list it in the data marketplace. We help them monetize it there. And we use some of the data sets from Amazon to help them do that. We use the technologies like Chris said with SageMaker and other tool sets to help them realize the value of their data in a real, meaningful way. >> So this sounds like a very strategic and technical partnership. >> Yeah, well, >> On both sides. >> It's technical and it's GOTO market. So if you take a look at, you know, Snowflake where they've built over 20 integrations now to different AWS services. So if you're using S3 for object storage, you can use Snowflake on top of that. If you want to load up Snowflake with Glue which is our ETL tool, you can do that. If you want to use QuickSite to do your data visualization on top of Snowflake, you can do that. So they've built integration to all of our services. And then we've built integrations like SageMaker back into Snowflake, and so that supports all kinds of specific customer use cases. So if you think of people that are doing any kind of cloud data platform workload, stuff like data engineering, data warehousing, data lakes, it could be even data applications, cyber security, unistore type things, Snowflake does an excellent job of helping our customers get into those types of environments. And so that's why we support the relationship with a variety of, you know, credit programs. We have a lot of co-sell motions on top of these technical integrations because we want to make sure that we not only have the right technical platform, but we've got the right GOTO market motion. And that's super important. >> Yeah, and I would add to that is like, you know one of the things that customers do is they make these large commitments to Amazon. And one of the best things that Amazon did was allow those customers to draw down Snowflake via the AWS Marketplace. So it's been wonderful to his point around the GOTO market, that was a huge issue for us. And, and again, this is where Amazon was innovative on identifying the ways to help make the customer have a better experience >> Chris G: Yeah. >> Chris D: and put the customer first. And this has been, you know, wonderful partnership there. >> Yeah. It really has. It's been a great, it's been really good. >> Well, and the customers are here. Like we said, >> Yep. >> Yes. Yes they are. >> we're north of 10,000 folks total, and customers are just chomping at the bit. There's been so much growth in the last three years from the last time, I think I heard the 2019 Snowflake Summit had about 1500 people. And here we are at 10,000 plus now, and standing-room-only keynote, the very big queue to get in, people turned away, pushed back to an overflow area to be able to see that, and that was yesterday. I didn't even get a chance to see what it was like today, but I imagine it was probably the same. Talk about the, when you're in customer conversations, where do you bring, from a GTM perspective, Where do you bring Snowflake into the conversation? >> Yeah >> Obviously, there's Redshift there, what does that look like? I imagine it follows the customer's needs, challenges. >> Exactly. >> Compelling events. >> Yeah. We're always going to work backwards from the customer need, and so that is the starting point for kindling both organizations. And so we're going to, you know, look at what they need. And from an AWS perspective, you know, if they're going with Snowflake, that's a very good thing. Right? 'Cause one of the things that we want to support is a selection experience to our AWS customers and make sure that no matter what they're doing, they're getting a very good, supported experience. And so we're always going to work backwards from the customer. And then once they make that technology decision, then we're going to support them, as I mentioned, with a whole bunch of co-sell resources. We have technical resources in the field. We have credit programs and in, you know, and, of course, we're going to market in a variety of different verticals as well with Snowflake. If you take a look at all the industry clouds that Snowflake has spun up, financial services and healthcare, and media entertainment, you know, those are all very specific use cases that are very valuable to an AWS customer. And AWS is going more and more to market on a vertical approach, and so Snowflake really just fits right in with our overall strategy. >> Right. Sounds like very tight alignment there. That mission alignment that Frank talked about yesterday. I know he was talking about that with respect to customers, but it sounds like there's a mission alignment between AWS and Snowflake. >> Mission alignment, yeah. >> I live that every week. (laughter) >> Sorry if I brought up a pain point. >> Yeah. Little bit. No. >> Guys, what's, in terms of use cases, obviously we've been here for a couple days. I'm sure you've had tremendous feedback, >> Chris G: Yeah. >> from, from customers, from partners, from the ecosystem. What's next, what can we expect to hear next? Maybe give us a preview of re:Invent in the few months. >> Preview of re:Invent. Yeah. No, well, one of the things we really want to start doing is just, you know, making the use case of, of launching Snowflake on AWS a lot easier. So what can we do to streamline those types of experiences? 'Cause a lot of times we'll find that customers, once they buy a third party solution like Snowflake, they have to then go through a whole series of configuration steps, and what can we do to streamline that? And so we're going to continue to work on that front. One of the other places that we've been exploring with Snowflake is how we work with channel partners. And, you know, when we first launched Marketplace it was really more of an app store model that was ISVs on one side and channel partners on the other, and there wasn't really a good fit for channel partners. And so four years ago we retrofitted the platform and have opened it up to resellers like an SHI or SIs like Salam or Deloitte who are top, two top SIs for Snowflake. And now they can use Marketplace to resell those technologies and also sell their services on top of that. So Snowflake's got a big, you know, practice with Salam, as I mentioned. You know, Salam can now sell through Marketplace and they can actually sell that statement of work and put that on the AWS bill all by virtue of using Marketplace, that automation platform. >> Ease of use for customers, ease of use for partners as well. >> Yes. >> And that ease of use is it's no joke. It's, it's not just a marketing term. It's measurable and it's about time-to-value, time-to-market, getting customers ahead of their competition so that they can be successful. Guys, thanks for joining me on theCUBE today. Talking about AWS and >> Nice to be back. Nice to be back in person. >> Isn't it nice to be back. It's great to be actually sitting across from another human. >> Exactly. >> Thank you so much for your insights, what you shared about the partnership and where it's going. We appreciate it. >> Thank you. >> Cool. Thank you. >> Thank you. >> All right guys. For Chris and Chris, I'm Lisa Martin, here watching theCUBE live from Las Vegas. I'll be back with my next guest momentarily, so stick around. (Upbeat techno music)
SUMMARY :
One of our alumni, the Chief Chris and Chris, welcome. Good to be back in person. and some of the benefits and it's crazy to see the And talk about it, Chris AWS has databases, Talk to us about it. And so that's, you know, and the co-selling motion And then to Chris's point, you know, and they're integrating to AWS. of the flywheel that is both that you are help, really targeting I think, you know, some of the examples, So it really seems to be what Snowflake and the Snowflake side And so they started to look at that, this is what we're going to do to help you I think, you know, and technical partnership. at, you know, Snowflake And one of the best And this has been, you know, It's been a great, it's been really good. Well, and the customers in the last three years I imagine it follows the And so we're going to, you That mission alignment that I live that every week. obviously we've been partners, from the ecosystem. and put that on the AWS bill all by virtue Ease of use for so that they can be successful. Nice to be back in person. Isn't it nice to be back. Thank you so much for your For Chris and Chris,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chris Grusz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chris Degnan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris D | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Western Union | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Amazon.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chris G | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chipotle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Grusz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
S3 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Chris G | PERSON | 0.99+ |
third part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ecosystem | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
QuickSite | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both organizations | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Charley Dublin, Acquia | StormForge Series
(upbeat music) >> We're back with Charley Dublin. He's the Vice President of Product Management at Acquia. Great to see you, Charley welcome to theCUBE. >> Nice to meet you Dave. >> Acquia, tell us about the company. >> Sure, so Acquia is the largest and best provider of Drupal hosting capabilities. We rank number two in the digital experience platform space, just behind Adobe. Very strong business growing well and innovating every day. >> Drupal open source, super deep high quality content management system. And more experience, you call it an experience platform. >> An experience platform, open, flexible. We want our customers to have choice the ability to solve their problems how they want leveraging the power of the open source community. >> What were the big challenges? Just describe your, kind of the business drivers. We're going to talk about StormForge but the things that you were facing some of the challenges that's kind of led you to StormForge. >> Sure, so our objective first is to provide the best experience with Drupal. So that entails lots of capabilities around ease of use for Drupal itself. But that has to run on a world class platform. It has to be the most performance. It has to be the most secure. It needs to be flexible to enable customers to run Drupal however they want to run Drupal. And so that involves the ability to support thousands of different kinds of modules that come out of the community. We want our customers to have choice with Drupal and to be able to support those choices on our platform. >> So optionality is key. Sometimes that creates other challenges. Like you've got one of everything. How do you deal with that challenge? >> That's a great question. Every strength is a form of weakness. And so our objective is really first to provide that choice but to do it in a cost efficient way. So we try to provide reference architectures for customers, opinionation for our customers to standardize take out some of the complexity that they might have if everything were a snowflake. But our objective is really to support their needs and err on the side of that flexibility. >> So you guys had to go through a major replatforming effort around containers and Kubernetes can you talk about that and what role StormForge played? >> Sure, so tied to the last point, our objective is to provide customers the highest performance, most secure platform. The entire industry of course is moving to Kubernetes and leveraging containers. We are a large consumer of AWS Services and are undergoing a major replatforming away from Legacy AWS towards Kubernetes and containers. And so that major replatforming effort is intending to enable customers to run applications how they want to and the power of Kubernetes and containers is to support that. And so we looked at StormForge as a way for us to right size resource capacity to support our customer's applications. >> I love it, AWS is now Legacy. But Andy Jassy one time said that if they had to redo Amazon they'd it in Lambda using serverless and so, it's been around a long time now. Okay so what were the outcomes that you were seeking? Was it, better management, cost reduction and how'd that go? >> Our customers run a wide range of applications. We support customers leveraging Drupal in every industry. Globally we do business in 30 different countries. And so what you have is a very wide range of applications and consumer and consumption models. And so we felt that leveraging StormForge would put us in a position where we'd be able to right size resource to those different kinds of applications. Essentially let the platform align to how customers wanted to operate their applications. And so StormForge's capability in conjunction with Kubernetes and containers really puts us in a position where customers are able to get the performance that they want, and when they need it on demand. A lot of the auto scaling capabilities that you get from Kubernetes and containers supports that. And so it really enables customers to run their applications how they want to functionally, as well as from a performance perspective. >> So this move toward containers and microservices sort of modern application development coincides with a modern platform like StormForge. And so there are, I'm sure there are alternatives out there, why StormForge? Maybe you could explain a little bit more about why, from your perspective what it does and why you chose them. >> So we leverage AWS in many respects in terms of the underlying platform, but we are a very strong DIY for how that platform supports Drupal applications. We view our expertise as being the best of Drupal. And so we felt like for us to true really maximize Kubernetes and containers and the power of those underlying technologies. On the one hand allows us to automate more and do more for customers. On the other side of it, it puts a tremendous burden on the level of expertise in order to do that well for every customer every day at scale. And so that at scale part of that was the challenge. And so we leverage StormForge to enable us to rightsize applications for performance, provide us cost benefits, allocate what you need when you need it for our customers. And that at scale piece is a critical part. We could do elements of it internally. We tried to do elements of that internally, but as you start getting to scale from, a few apps to hundreds of apps to certainly across our fleet of tens of thousands of applications, you really need something that leverages machine learning. You really need a technology that's integrated well within AWS and StormForge provided that solution. >> Make sure I got this right. So it sounds like you sort of from a skill standpoint transitioned or applied your skills from turning knobs if you will, to automation and scale. >> Correct. >> And what was that like? Was the team leaning into that, loving it? Was it a, a challenging thing for you guys to get there? >> That's a good question. The benefit in the way that StormForge applies it. So they leverage machine learning to enable us to make better decisions. So we still have the control elements, but we have much greater insight into what that would mean ahead of time before customers would be affected. So we still have the knobs we need, but we're able to do it at scale. And then from the automation point, it allows us to focus our deep expertise on making Drupal and the core hosting platform capabilities awesome. Sort of the stuff and resource allocation resource consumption. That's an enabler we can outsource that to StormForge >> This is not batch it's, you're basically doing this in sort of near realtime Optimize Live, is the capability, maybe you can describe what it is. >> So Optimize Live is new, we're in testing with that. We've done extensive testing with StormForge on the core call it decision making logic that allows for the right sizing of consumption and resources for our customer application. So that has already been tested. So the core engine's been tested. Optimize Live allows us to do that in real time to make policy decisions across our fleet on what's the right trade off between performance cost, other parameters. Again, it informs our decision making and our management of our platform. That would be very, very difficult otherwise. Without StormForge we'd have to do massive data aggregation. We'd have to have machine learning and additional infrastructure to manage to derive this information, and, and, and. And that is not our core business. We don't want to be doing that. We want insights to manage our platform to enable customers and StormForge for provides that. >> So it's kind of human in the loop thing. Hey, here's what like our recommendation or here's some options that you might want to, here's a path that you want to go down, but it's not taking that action for you necessarily. You don't want that. You want to make sure that the experts are have a hand in it still, is that correct? >> Correct, you still want the experts to have a hand in it but you don't want them to have a hand in it on each individual app. You need that, that machine learning capability that insight that allows you to do that at scale. >> So if you had to step back and think about your relationship with StormForge what was the business impact of bringing them in? >> First, from a time to market perspective we're able to get to market with a higher performing more cost effective solution earlier. So there's that benefit. Second benefit to the earlier point is that we're able to make resource allocation decisions focused on where our core competency is, not into the guts of Kubernetes containers and the like. Third is that the machine learning talent that StormForge brings to the table is world class. I've run machine learning teams, data science teams and would put them in the top 1% of any team that I've worked with in terms of their expertise. The logic and decision making and insights is outstanding. So we can get to the best decision, the optimal decision much more quickly. And then when you accompany that with the newer product in Optimize Live with that automation component you mentioned, all the better. So we're able to make decisions quicker, get it implemented in our platform and realize the benefits. What customers get from that is much better performance of their applications. More real time, higher, able to scale more dynamically. What we get is resource efficiency and our network and platform efficiency. We're not over allocating a capacity that costs us more money than we should. We're under allocating capacity that could have a lower performance solution for our customers. >> So that puts money in your pocket and your customers are happier. So there are higher renewal rates, less churn, high air prices over time as you add more capabilities. >> That's correct. >> What's it like, new application approach, Kubernetes containers, fine. Okay I need a modern platform but it's a relatively new company StormForge. What's it like working with them? >> Their talent level is world class. I wasn't familiar with them when I joined Acquia came to know them and been very impressed. There's many other providers in the market that will speak to some similar capabilities and will make many claims. But from our assessment our view is that they're the right partner for us, they're the right size, they're flexible, excellent team. They've evolved their technology roadmap very quickly. They deliver on their promises and commits a very good team to work with. So I've been very impressed for such an early stage company to deliver and to support our business so rapidly. So I think that's a strength. And then I think again the quality that people that's been manifested in the product itself, it's a high quality product. I think it's unique to the market. >> So Napoleon Hill famous writer, thinker, he wrote "Think and Grow Rich." If you haven't read it, check it out. One of his concepts is this a lever, small lever can move a big rock. It can be very powerful. Do you see StormForge as having that kind of effect on your business that change on your business? >> I do. Like I said, I think the engagement with them has proven, and this isn't, debatable based on the results that we've had with them. We ran that team through the ringer to validate the technology. Again, we'd heard lots of promises from other companies. Ran that team through the ringer with extensive testing across many customers, large and small, many use cases, to really stress test their capabilities. And they came out well ahead of any metric we put forth even well ahead of claims that they had coming into the engagement. They exceeded that. And so that's why I'm here. Why I'm an advocate. Why I think they're an outstanding company with a tremendous amount of potential. >> Thinking about, what can you tell us about where you want to take the company and the partnership with StormForge. >> I think the main next step is for us to engage with StormForge to drive automation drive decisioning, as we expand and move more and more customers over to our new platform. We're going to uncover use cases, different challenges as we go. So I think the, it's a learning process for both both sides, but I think the it's been successful so far and has a lot potential. >> Sounds like you had a great business and a great new partnership. So thanks so much for coming on theCUBE, appreciate it. >> Thank you very much, appreciate your time. >> My pleasure. And thank you for watching theCUBE, you're global leader in enterprise tech coverage. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Great to see you, Charley Sure, so Acquia is the largest And more experience, you call the ability to solve their but the things that you were facing And so that involves the Sometimes that creates other challenges. and err on the side of that flexibility. and the power of Kubernetes and containers that if they had to redo And so what you have is a very And so there are, and the power of those So it sounds like you sort outsource that to StormForge is the capability, maybe that allows for the right sizing of here's a path that you want to go down, experts to have a hand in it Third is that the machine learning talent So that puts money in your pocket but it's a relatively and to support our business so rapidly. as having that kind of the engagement with them has proven, and the partnership with StormForge. We're going to uncover use cases, Sounds like you had a great business Thank you very much, And thank you for watching theCUBE,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Charley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Acquia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
StormForge | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adobe | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 different countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds of apps | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Drupal | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Charley Dublin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lambda | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Think and Grow Rich | TITLE | 0.98+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Optimize Live | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Napoleon Hill | PERSON | 0.96+ |
applications | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
tens of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
StormForge | TITLE | 0.93+ |
1% | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
each individual app | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
one time | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Kubernetes | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.85+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
President | PERSON | 0.58+ |
Legacy | ORGANIZATION | 0.55+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
Live | TITLE | 0.49+ |
Charley Dublin, Acquia | StormForge
(upbeat music) >> We're back with Charley Dublin. He's the Vice President of Product Management at Acquia. Great to see you, Charley welcome to theCUBE. >> Nice to meet you Dave. >> Acquia, tell us about the company. >> Sure, so Acquia is the largest and best provider of Drupal hosting capabilities. We rank number two in the digital experience platform space, just behind Adobe. Very strong business growing well and innovating every day. >> Drupal open source, super deep high quality content management system. And more experience, you call it an experience platform. >> An experience platform, open, flexible. We want our customers to have choice the ability to solve their problems how they want leveraging the power of the open source community. >> What were the big challenges? Just describe your, kind of the business drivers. We're going to talk about StormForge but the things that you were facing some of the challenges that's kind of led you to StormForge. >> Sure, so our objective first is to provide the best experience with Drupal. So that entails lots of capabilities around ease of use for Drupal itself. But that has to run on a world class platform. It has to be the most performance. It has to be the most secure. It needs to be flexible to enable customers to run Drupal however they want to run Drupal. And so that involves the ability to support thousands of different kinds of modules that come out of the community. We want our customers to have choice with Drupal and to be able to support those choices on our platform. >> So optionality is key. Sometimes that creates other challenges. Like you've got one of everything. How do you deal with that challenge? >> That's a great question. Every strength is a form of weakness. And so our objective is really first to provide that choice but to do it in a cost efficient way. So we try to provide reference architectures for customers, opinionation for our customers to standardize take out some of the complexity that they might have if everything were a snowflake. But our objective is really to support their needs and err on the side of that flexibility. >> So you guys had to go through a major replatforming effort around containers and Kubernetes can you talk about that and what role StormForge played? >> Sure, so tied to the last point, our objective is to provide customers the highest performance, most secure platform. The entire industry of course is moving to Kubernetes and leveraging containers. We are a large consumer of AWS Services and are undergoing a major replatforming away from Legacy AWS towards Kubernetes and containers. And so that major replatforming effort is intending to enable customers to run applications how they want to and the power of Kubernetes and containers is to support that. And so we looked at StormForge as a way for us to right size resource capacity to support our customer's applications. >> I love it, AWS is now Legacy. But Andy Jassy one time said that if they had to redo Amazon they'd it in Lambda using serverless and so, it's been around a long time now. Okay so what were the outcomes that you were seeking? Was it, better management, cost reduction and how'd that go? >> Our customers run a wide range of applications. We support customers leveraging Drupal in every industry. Globally we do business in 30 different countries. And so what you have is a very wide range of applications and consumer and consumption models. And so we felt that leveraging StormForge would put us in a position where we'd be able to right size resource to those different kinds of applications. Essentially let the platform align to how customers wanted to operate their applications. And so StormForge's capability in conjunction with Kubernetes and containers really puts us in a position where customers are able to get the performance that they want, and when they need it on demand. A lot of the auto scaling capabilities that you get from Kubernetes and containers supports that. And so it really enables customers to run their applications how they want to functionally, as well as from a performance perspective. >> So this move toward containers and microservices sort of modern application development coincides with a modern platform like StormForge. And so there are, I'm sure there are alternatives out there, why StormForge? Maybe you could explain a little bit more about why, from your perspective what it does and why you chose them. >> So we leverage AWS in many respects in terms of the underlying platform, but we are a very strong DIY for how that platform supports Drupal applications. We view our expertise as being the best of Drupal. And so we felt like for us to true really maximize Kubernetes and containers and the power of those underlying technologies. On the one hand allows us to automate more and do more for customers. On the other side of it, it puts a tremendous burden on the level of expertise in order to do that well for every customer every day at scale. And so that at scale part of that was the challenge. And so we leverage StormForge to enable us to rightsize applications for performance, provide us cost benefits, allocate what you need when you need it for our customers. And that at scale piece is a critical part. We could do elements of it internally. We tried to do elements of that internally, but as you start getting to scale from, a few apps to hundreds of apps to certainly across our fleet of tens of thousands of applications, you really need something that leverages machine learning. You really need a technology that's integrated well within AWS and StormForge provided that solution. >> Make sure I got this right. So it sounds like you sort of from a skill standpoint transitioned or applied your skills from turning knobs if you will, to automation and scale. >> Correct. >> And what was that like? Was the team leaning into that, loving it? Was it a, a challenging thing for you guys to get there? >> That's a good question. The benefit in the way that StormForge applies it. So they leverage machine learning to enable us to make better decisions. So we still have the control elements, but we have much greater insight into what that would mean ahead of time before customers would be affected. So we still have the knobs we need, but we're able to do it at scale. And then from the automation point, it allows us to focus our deep expertise on making Drupal and the core hosting platform capabilities awesome. Sort of the stuff and resource allocation resource consumption. That's an enabler we can outsource that to StormForge >> This is not batch it's, you're basically doing this in sort of near realtime Optimize Live, is the capability, maybe you can describe what it is. >> So Optimize Live is new, we're in testing with that. We've done extensive testing with StormForge on the core call it decision making logic that allows for the right sizing of consumption and resources for our customer application. So that has already been tested. So the core engine's been tested. Optimize Live allows us to do that in real time to make policy decisions across our fleet on what's the right trade off between performance cost, other parameters. Again, it informs our decision making and our management of our platform. That would be very, very difficult otherwise. Without StormForge we'd have to do massive data aggregation. We'd have to have machine learning and additional infrastructure to manage to derive this information, and, and, and. And that is not our core business. We don't want to be doing that. We want insights to manage our platform to enable customers and StormForge for provides that. >> So it's kind of human in the loop thing. Hey, here's what like our recommendation or here's some options that you might want to, here's a path that you want to go down, but it's not taking that action for you necessarily. You don't want that. You want to make sure that the experts are have a hand in it still, is that correct? >> Correct, you still want the experts to have a hand in it but you don't want them to have a hand in it on each individual app. You need that, that machine learning capability that insight that allows you to do that at scale. >> So if you had to step back and think about your relationship with StormForge what was the business impact of bringing them in? >> First, from a time to market perspective we're able to get to market with a higher performing more cost effective solution earlier. So there's that benefit. Second benefit to the earlier point is that we're able to make resource allocation decisions focused on where our core competency is, not into the guts of Kubernetes containers and the like. Third is that the machine learning talent that StormForge brings to the table is world class. I've run machine learning teams, data science teams and would put them in the top 1% of any team that I've worked with in terms of their expertise. The logic and decision making and insights is outstanding. So we can get to the best decision, the optimal decision much more quickly. And then when you accompany that with the newer product in Optimize Live with that automation component you mentioned, all the better. So we're able to make decisions quicker, get it implemented in our platform and realize the benefits. What customers get from that is much better performance of their applications. More real time, higher, able to scale more dynamically. What we get is resource efficiency and our network and platform efficiency. We're not over allocating a capacity that costs us more money than we should. We're under allocating capacity that could have a lower performance solution for our customers. >> So that puts money in your pocket and your customers are happier. So there are higher renewal rates, less churn, high air prices over time as you add more capabilities. >> That's correct. >> What's it like, new application approach, Kubernetes containers, fine. Okay I need a modern platform but it's a relatively new company StormForge. What's it like working with them? >> Their talent level is world class. I wasn't familiar with them when I joined Acquia came to know them and been very impressed. There's many other providers in the market that will speak to some similar capabilities and will make many claims. But from our assessment our view is that they're the right partner for us, they're the right size, they're flexible, excellent team. They've evolved their technology roadmap very quickly. They deliver on their promises and commits a very good team to work with. So I've been very impressed for such an early stage company to deliver and to support our business so rapidly. So I think that's a strength. And then I think again the quality that people that's been manifested in the product itself, it's a high quality product. I think it's unique to the market. >> So Napoleon Hill famous writer, thinker, he wrote "Think and Grow Rich." If you haven't read it, check it out. One of his concepts is this a lever, small lever can move a big rock. It can be very powerful. Do you see StormForge as having that kind of effect on your business that change on your business? >> I do. Like I said, I think the engagement with them has proven, and this isn't, debatable based on the results that we've had with them. We ran that team through the ringer to validate the technology. Again, we'd heard lots of promises from other companies. Ran that team through the ringer with extensive testing across many customers, large and small, many use cases, to really stress test their capabilities. And they came out well ahead of any metric we put forth even well ahead of claims that they had coming into the engagement. They exceeded that. And so that's why I'm here. Why I'm an advocate. Why I think they're an outstanding company with a tremendous amount of potential. >> Thinking about, what can you tell us about where you want to take the company and the partnership with StormForge. >> I think the main next step is for us to engage with StormForge to drive automation drive decisioning, as we expand and move more and more customers over to our new platform. We're going to uncover use cases, different challenges as we go. So I think the, it's a learning process for both both sides, but I think the it's been successful so far and has a lot potential. >> Sounds like you had a great business and a great new partnership. So thanks so much for coming on theCUBE, appreciate it. >> Thank you very much, appreciate your time. >> My pleasure. And thank you for watching theCUBE, you're global leader in enterprise tech coverage. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Great to see you, Charley Sure, so Acquia is the largest And more experience, you call the ability to solve their but the things that you were facing And so that involves the Sometimes that creates other challenges. and err on the side of that flexibility. and the power of Kubernetes and containers that if they had to redo And so what you have is a very And so there are, and the power of those So it sounds like you sort outsource that to StormForge is the capability, maybe that allows for the right sizing of here's a path that you want to go down, experts to have a hand in it Third is that the machine learning talent So that puts money in your pocket but it's a relatively and to support our business so rapidly. as having that kind of the engagement with them has proven, and the partnership with StormForge. We're going to uncover use cases, Sounds like you had a great business Thank you very much, And thank you for watching theCUBE,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Charley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Acquia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
StormForge | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adobe | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 different countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds of apps | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Drupal | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Charley Dublin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lambda | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Think and Grow Rich | TITLE | 0.98+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Optimize Live | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Napoleon Hill | PERSON | 0.96+ |
applications | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
tens of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
StormForge | TITLE | 0.93+ |
1% | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
each individual app | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
one time | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Kubernetes | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.85+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
President | PERSON | 0.58+ |
Legacy | ORGANIZATION | 0.55+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
Live | TITLE | 0.49+ |
COMMUNICATIONS Acellerating Network
(upbeat music) >> Hi, today I'm going to talk about network analytics and what that means for telecommunications as we go forward, thinking about 5G, what the impact that's likely to have on network analytics and the data requirement, not just to run the network and to understand the network a little bit better, but also to inform the rest of the operation of the telecommunications business. So as we think about where we are in terms of network analytics and what that is over the last 20 years, the telecommunications industry has evolved its management infrastructure to abstract away from some of the specific technologies in the network. So what do we mean by that? Well, in the, when initial telecommunications networks were designed there were management systems that were built in. Eventually fault management systems, assurance systems, provisioning systems, and so on, were abstracted away. So it didn't matter what network technology had, whether it was a Nokia technology or Erickson technology or Huawei technology or whoever it happened to be. You could just look at your fault management system and understand where faults were happened. As we got into the last sort of 10, 15 years or so telecommunication service providers become, became more sophisticated in terms of their approach to data analytics and specifically network analytics and started asking questions about why and what if in relation to their network performance and network behavior. And so network analytics as a sort of an independent functioning was born and over time more and more data began to get loaded into the network analytics function. So today just about every carrier in the world has a network analytics function that deals with vast quantities of data in big data environments that are now being migrated to the cloud. As all telecommunications carriers are migrating as many IT workloads as possible to the cloud. So what are the things that are happening as we migrate to the cloud that drive enhancements in use cases and enhancements in scale in telecommunications network analytics? Well, 5G is the big thing, right? So 5G, it's not just another G in that sense. I mean, in some cases, in some senses it is 5G means greater bandwidth and lower latency and all those good things. So, you know, we can watch YouTube videos with less interference and, and less sluggish bandwidth and so on and so forth. But 5G is really about the enterprise and enterprise services transformation. 5G is a more secure kind of a network, but 5G is also a more pervasive network. 5G has a fundamentally different network topology than previous generations. So there's going to be more masts. And that means that you can have more pervasive connectivity. So things like IOT and edge applications, autonomous car, current smart cities, these kinds of things are all much better served because you've got more masts, that of course means that you're going to have a lot more data as well and we'll get to that. The second piece is immersive digital services. So with more masts, with more connectivity, with lower latency, with higher bandwidth with the potential is immense for services innovation. And we don't know what those services are going to be. We know that technologies like augmented reality, virtual reality, things like this have great potential, but we have yet to see where those commercial applications are going to be, but the innovation and the innovation potential for 5G is phenomenal. It certainly means that we're going to have a lot more edge devices. And that again is going to lead to an increase in the amount of data that we have available. And then the idea of pervasive connectivity when it comes to smart cities, autonomous cars, integrated traffic management systems, all of this kind of stuff, those kind of smart environments thrive where you've got this kind of pervasive connectivity, this persistent connection to the network. Again, that's going to drive more innovation. And again, because you've got these new connected devices, you're going to get even more data. So this rise, this exponential rise in data is really what's driving the change in network analytics. And there are four major vectors that are driving this increase in data in terms of both volume and in terms of speed. So the first thing is more physical elements. So we said already that 5G networks are going to have a different topology. 5G networks will have more devices, more masts. And so with more physical elements in the network, you're going to get more physical data coming off those physical networks. And so that needs to be aggregated and collected and managed and stored and analyzed and understood so that we can have a better understanding as to, you know, why things happened the way they do, why the network behaves in which they do in ways that it does and why devices that are connected to the network and ultimately of course, consumers, whether they be enterprises or retail customers behave in the way they do in relation to their interaction with the network. Edge nodes and devices. We're going to have an explosion in terms of the number of devices. We've already seen IOT devices with your different kinds of trackers and sensors that are hanging off the edge of the network, whether it's to make buildings smarter or car smart or people smarter in terms of having the measurements and the connectivity and all that sort of stuff. So the numbers of devices on the edge and beyond the edge are going to be phenomenal. One of the things that we've been trying to wrestle with as an industry over the last few years is where does a telco network end and where does the enterprise, or even the consumer network begin? It used to be very clear that, you know, the telco network ended at the router but now it's not that clear anymore because in the enterprise space, particularly with virtualized networking, which we're going to talk about in a second, you start to see end to end network services being deployed. And so are they being those services in some instances that are being managed by the service provider themselves, and in some cases by the enterprise client. Again, the line between where the telco network ends and where the enterprise or the consumer network begins is not clear. So those edge, the proliferation of devices at the edge, in terms of, you know, what those devices are, what the data yield is and what the policies are that need to govern those devices in terms of security and privacy and things like that, that's all going to be really, really important. Virtualized services, we just touched on that briefly. One of the big, big trends that's happening right now is not just the shift of IT operations onto the cloud, but the shift of the network onto the cloud, the virtualization of network infrastructure. And that has two major impacts. First of all, it means that you've got the agility and all of the scale benefits that you get from migrating workloads to the cloud, the elasticity and the growth and all that sort of stuff, but arguably more importantly for the telco it means that with a virtualized network infrastructure, you can offer entire networks to enterprise clients. So, you know, selling to a government department, for example, who's looking to stand up a system for, you know, certification of, you know, export certification, something like that. You can not just sell them the connectivity, but you can sell them the networking and the infrastructure in order to serve that entire end to end application. You could send, you could offer them in theory, an entire end-to-end communications network. And with 5G network slicing, they can even have their own little piece of the 5G bandwidth that's been allocated to gets a carrier and have a complete end to end environment. So the kinds of services that can be offered by telcos given virtualize network infrastructure are many and varied and it's an outstanding opportunity. But what it also means is that the number of network elements virtualized in this case is also exploding. And that means the amount of data that we're getting on, informing us as to how those network elements are behaving, how they're performing is going to go up as well. And then finally, AI complexity. So on the demand inside while historically network analytics, big data has been driven by returns in terms of data monetization, whether that's through cost avoidance or service assurance, or even revenue generation through data monetization and things like that. AI is transforming telecommunications and every other industry. The potential for autonomous operations is extremely attractive. And so understanding how the end-to-end telecommunication service delivery infrastructure works is essential as a training ground for AI models that can help to automate a huge amount of telecommunications operating processes. So the AI demand for data is just going through the roof. And so all of these things combined to mean that big data is getting explosive. It is absolutely going through the roof. So that's a huge thing that's happening. So as telecommunications companies around the world are looking at their network analytics infrastructure, which was initially designed for service insurance primarily and how they migrate that to the cloud. These things are impacting on those decisions because you're not just looking at migrating a workload to operate in the cloud that used to work in the data center. Now you're looking at migrating a workload but also expanding the use cases in that workload. And bear in mind many of those workloads are going to need to remain on-prem. So they'll need to be within a private cloud or at best a hybrid cloud environment in order to satisfy regulatory jurisdiction requirements. So let's talk about an example. So LG Uplus is fantastic service provider in Korea, huge growth in that business over the last, over the last 10, 15 years or so. And obviously most people would be familiar with LG, the electronics brand, maybe less so with, with LG Uplus, but they've been doing phenomenal work and were the first business in the world to launch commercial 5G in 2019. And so a huge milestone that they achieved. And at the same time they deployed the Network Real-time Analytics Platform or NRAP from a combination of Cloudera and our partner Caremark . Now, there were a number of things that were driving the requirement for the analytics platform at the time. Clearly the 5G launch was the big thing that they had in mind, but there were other things that were at play as well. So within the 5G launch, they were looking for a visibility of services and service assurance and service quality. So, you know, what services have been launched? How are they being taken up? What are the issues that are arising? Where the faults happening? Where are the problems? Because clearly when you launch a new service like that you want to understand and be on top of the issues as they arise. So that was really, really important. A second piece was and, you know, this is not a new story to any telco in the world, right? But there are silos in operation. And so it taking advantage of, or eliminating redundancies through the process of digital transformation it was really important. And so particular, the two silos between wired and the wireless sides of the business needed to come together so that there would be an integrated network management system for LG Uplus as they rolled out 5G. So eliminating redundancy and driving cost savings through the integration of the silos was really, really important. And that's a process and the people think every bit, as much as it is a systems and a data thing so another big driver. And the fourth one, you know, we've talked a little bit about some of these things, right? 5G brings huge opportunity for enterprise services innovation. So industry 4.0, digital experience, these kinds of use cases were very important in the South Korean market and in the business of LG Uplus And so looking at AI and how can you apply AI to network management? Again, there's a number of use cases, really, really exciting use cases that have gone live now in LG Uplus since we did this initial deployment and they're making fantastic strides there. Big data analytics for users across LG Uplus, right? So it's not just for, it's not just for the immediate application of 5G or the support or the 5G network, but also for other data analysts and data scientists across the LG Uplus business. Network analytics while primarily it's, it's primary use case is around network management. LG Uplus or network analytics has applications across the entire business, right? So, you know, for customer churn or next best offer for understanding customer experience and customer behavior really important there for digital advertising, for product innovation, all sorts of different use cases and departments within the business needed access to this information. So collaboration sharing across the network, the real-time network analytics platform it was very important. And then finally, as I mentioned, LG group is much bigger than just LG Uplus. It's got the electronics and other pieces, and they had launched a major group wide digital transformation program in 2019. And so being a part of that was important as well. Some of the seems that they were looking to address. So first of all, the integration of wired and wireless data sources, and so getting your assurance data sources, your network data sources and so on integration was really, really important. Scale was massive for them. You know, they're talking about billions of transactions in under a minute being processed and hundreds of terabytes per day. So, you know, phenomenal scale that needed to be, you know, available out of the box as it were. Real time indicators and alarms. And there was lots of KPIs and thresholds set that, you know, to make, made to meet certain criteria, certain standards. Customer specific real time analysis of 5G, services particularly for the launch, root cause analysis and AI based prediction on service anomalies and service issues was a core use case. As I talked about already the provision of service, of data services across the organization. And then support for 5G, served the business service impact was extremely important. So it's not just understand, well, you know, that you have an outreach in a particular network element, but what is the impact on the business of LG Uplus, but also what is the impact on the business of the customer from an outage or an anomaly or a problem on the network. So being able to answer those kinds of questions really, really important too. And as I said between Cloudera and Caremark and LG Uplus they have already, themselves an intrinsic part of the solution, this is what we ended up building. So a big, complicated architecture side. I really don't want to go into too much detail here. You can see these things for yourself, but let me skip through it really quickly. So, first of all, the key data sources. You have all of your wireless network information, other data sources, this is really important 'cause sometimes you kind of skip over this. There are other systems that are in place like the enterprise data warehouse that needed to be integrated as well. Southbound and northbound interfaces. So we get our data, yo know, from the network and so on and network management applications through both file interfaces, Kafka, NiFi are important technologies. And also the RDBMS systems that, you know, like the enterprise data warehouse that we're able to feed that into the system. And then northbound, you know, we spoke already about making network analytics services available across the enterprise. So, you know, having both a file and API interface available for other systems and other consumers across the enterprise is very important. Lots of stuff going on then in the platform itself. Two petabytes and persistent storage, Cloudera HDFS, 300 nodes for the raw data storage and then Kudu for real time storage for, you know, real-time indicator analysis around generation and other real time processes. So there was the core of the solution spark processes for ETL, key quality indicators and alarming, and also a bunch of work done around data preparation, data generation for transferal to, for party systems through the northbound interfaces. Impala API queries for real-time systems there on the right hand side and then a whole bunch of clustering classification, prediction jobs through the ML processes, the machine learning processes. Again, another key use case, and we've done a bunch of work on that, and I encourage you to have a look at the Cloudera website for more detail on some of the work that we did here. Some pretty cool stuff. And then finally, just the upstream services, some of these, there's lots more than simply these ones, but service assurance is really, really important so SQM, CEM and ACD right to the service quality management customer experience autonomous control is really, really important consumers of the real-time analytics platform and your conventional service assurance functions like faulted performance management. These things are as much consumers of the information and the network analytics platform as they are providers of data to the network analytics platform. So some of the specific use cases that have been stood up and that are delivering value to this day and there's lots of more besides, but these are just three that we pulled out. So, first of all, sort of specific monitoring and customer quality analysis care and response. So again, growing from the initial 5G launch, and then broadening into broader services, understanding where there are issues so that when people complain, when people have an issue that we can answer the concerns of the client in a substantive way. AI functions around root cause analysis understanding why things went wrong when they went wrong and also making recommendations as to how to avoid those occurrences in the future. So, you know, what preventative measures can be taken. And then finally, the collaboration function across LG Uplus extremely important and continues to be important to this day where data is shared throughout the enterprise, through the API Lira, through file interfaces and other things and through interface integrations with upstream systems. So that's kind of the real quick run through of LG Uplus. And the numbers are just staggering. You know, we've seen upwards of a billion transactions in under 40 seconds being tested. And we've gone through beyond those thresholds now already, and we're start, and this isn't just a theoretical sort of a benchmarking test or something like that. We're seeing these kinds of volumes of data and not too far down the track. So with those things that I mentioned earlier or with the proliferation of network infrastructure in the 5G context with virtualized elements, with all of these other bits and pieces are driving massive volumes of data towards the network analytics platform. So phenomenal scale. This is just one example. We work with service providers all over the world is over 80% of the top 100 telecommunication service providers run on Cloudera. They use Cloudera in the network and we're seeing those customers all migrating Legacy Cloudera platforms now onto CDP onto the Cloudera Data Platform. They're increasing the jobs that they do. So it's not just warehousing, not just ingestion of ETL and moving into things like machine learning. And also looking at new data sources from places like NW DAF the network data analytics function in 5G or the management and orchestration layer in software defined network function virtualization. So, you know, new use cases coming in all the time, new data sources coming in all the time, growth in the application scope from, as we say, from edge to AI. And so it's really exciting to see how the footprint is growing and how the applications in telecommunications are really making a difference in facilitating network transformation. And that's covering, that's me covered for today. I hope you found that helpful. By all means please reach out. There's a couple of links here. You can follow me on Twitter. You can connect to the telecommunications page. Reach out to me directly at Cloudera I'd love to answer your questions and talk to you about how big data is transforming networks and how network transformation is accelerating telcos throughout the world.
SUMMARY :
and in the business of LG Uplus
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Korea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
LG | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Caremark | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Erickson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cloudera | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Huawei | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
LG Uplus | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Two petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Kafka | TITLE | 0.98+ |
under 40 seconds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four major vectors | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first business | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
hundreds of terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ | |
Cloudera | TITLE | 0.96+ |
NiFi | TITLE | 0.95+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
two silos | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
fourth one | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
both volume | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
last 20 years | DATE | 0.88+ |
100 telecommunication service providers | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
two major impacts | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Uplus | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.85+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
a billion transactions | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
billions of transactions | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
both file | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
last few years | DATE | 0.71+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
under a minute | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
links | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
Legacy | TITLE | 0.69+ |
API Lira | TITLE | 0.69+ |
300 nodes | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
a second | QUANTITY | 0.64+ |
Kudu | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
5G | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
4.0 | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
South Korean | OTHER | 0.55+ |
NRAP | TITLE | 0.48+ |
Glenn Finch, IBM | IBM Think 2021
>> Narrator: From around the globe it's theCUBE with digital coverage of IBM Think 2021 brought to you by IBM. >> Hello and welcome back to the cube's ongoing coverage of IBM Think 2021, the virtual edition. My name is Dave Vellante and I'm excited to introduce our next segment. We're going to dig into the intersection of machines and humans and the changing nature of work, worker productivity, and the potential of humans. With me is Glenn Finch, who is the global managing partner for data and AI at IBM Glenn, great to see you again. Thanks for coming on. >> Dave. Good to be with you, always a lot of fun to chat. >> I'm interested in this concept that you've been working on about amplifying worker potential. You've got humans, you've got digital workers coming together. Maybe you could talk a little bit about what you're seeing at that intersection. >> You know, it's interesting for most of my career I've always thought about amplifying human worker potential. And, you know, I would say over the last five years, you know we start to think about this concept of digital workers and amplifying their potential so that human potential can extend even further. What's cool is when we get them both to work together: amplifying digital worker potential, amplifying human worker potential, to radically change how service is experienced by an end consumer. I mean, that's really the winner is when you start seeing the end consumer, the end user fundamentally feeling the difference in the experience. >> I mean, a lot of the, you see a lot of the trade press and the journalists, they like to focus on the sort of the negative of automation. But when you talk to people who have implemented things take, for example, RPA, they're so happy that they're not having to do these menial tasks anymore. And then it's sort of the interesting discussion is, okay, well, what are you doing with your free time? What are you doing with your weekends? So how should we be thinking about that? What you, what you called amplifying human worker potential, what has to occur for that outcome? >> And you know, that all my life I've spent time making money for people, right? And this last year I was involved in a project where it, it fundamentally changed is tied to answer that exact question. You know, the service men and women in America who are willing to risk their lives, you know for our country, they file claims for medical benefits. And on average, it would take 15 days to get a response. We actually, for about 70 or 80% of them we've taken that down to like 15 minutes. And to do that, you can't just drop in a RPA. You can't just drop in AI. You, it's not one thing, right? It's this, it's this seamless interaction between digital workers and human workers, right? So that a lot of the more routine mundane tasks can be done by AI and, and robotics, but all of the really hard complex cases that only a human being can adjudicate, that's what the folks that were doing the more mundane work can go focus on. So, I mean, that's what makes me come to work every day is if I can change the life of a service man or woman that was willing to risk their lives for our country. So that that's, that's the concept. Now, the critical piece of what I said, it's not about implementing AI and robotics anymore, because a lot of that starts to get very rote, but picking up on, okay, we've liberated this block of human capability. How do we reposition it? How do we re-skill it? How do we get them to focus on new things? That's just as important the human change aspect, incredibly important. >> Yeah. I mean, that's interesting, because you're right. I mean, the downside, you mentioned RPA a lot of it is paving the cow path and you know the human in the loop piece has been has been missing and that's obviously changing. But what about the flip side of that equation? Where, you know, you asked the question, okay what can humans do that machines can't do? That equation you know, continues to evolve, but maybe you could talk about where you've amplified the digital worker potential. >> Yeah. So, you know, one of our clients has Anthem and you know, they've been on a variety of programs with us to talk about this, but, you know we just recorded, you know, another session with them for Think where the Chief Technology Officer came and talked about how they wanted to radically change their member experience. And when you think about the last year, I mean, I don't know, Dave, I know you travel a lot cause I see you in all the places that I'm in. But I don't know if you remember, like 15 months ago if you had to wait on the phone for two minutes you thought it was an eternity, right? You're like, what's the matter with me? I'm a frequent flyer. I deserve a better service than this. Then as COVID started roll around, those wait times were two hours, and then 30 days into COVID, if you got a call back within two days or two weeks, it was a blessing, right? So all of our expectations changed in an instant, right? So I have to say over the last 12 to 15 months that's where we've been spending a lot of our time in all of those human contact, human touch places to radically transition the ability to be responsive and touch people with the same experience that we had 15 months ago to get an answer back in two minutes. You can't get enough people right now to do that. And so we're forced to make sure that the digital experience is what that needs to be. So the digital worker has to be up and on, and extending the brand experience the same way that the human worker was back when everybody could be at a call center. That make sense, Dave? >> Yeah. I mean, what I think I like about this conversation Glenn is it's not an either/or, it's not a zero-sum game, which it kind of, they sort of used to be, I mean we've talked about this before humans and machines have always replaced humans at certain tasks, but it never really had cognitive tasks. And that's why I think there's a lot of fear out there, but what you're talking about is, is a potential to amplify both human and digital capabilities. And I think that people might look at that and say, well, wait a minute. Isn't it a zero-sum game, but it but it's not. Explain why. >> Yeah. So we're never finding the zero-sum game, because there is always something for people to do, right? And so, you know I talked about the one amplification of digital worker at Anthem. Let me switch to an amplification of a human worker. So state of Rhode Island, you know, we had the great honor to work with their governor and their department of health and human services around again, around the whole COVID thing. We started out just answering basic questions and helping with contact racing. And then, from there, we moved into, you know helping them with their data in AI, being able to answer questions. Why are there hotspots? Why, you know, should I shut this portion of the city down? Should I shut bars down? Should I do this? And the governor and the health and human services director were constantly saying in press briefings in the morning. Well, you know, we learned from our partners IBM that we want to consider this, right? And we did pinpoint vaccinations and other things like that. To me, that's that whole continuum. So, you know, we liberated some people from one spot. They went to work in another spot, all human beings guided by AI. So, you know, I think this is all about, you know for the first time in our lives, being able to realize sort of the, the vaulted member experience or client experience that everybody's already talked about using a blend of digital workers and human workers. It's just, it's all about the experience I think. >> I mean, you're, you're laying out some really good outcomes and you mentioned some of the, you know, the folks in the military, the healthcare examples and I'm struck because if you think about the, look at the numbers, I mean the productivity gains over the last 20 years particularly in the US and Europe, it's not the case for China because their productivity is exploding, but but it's gone down. And so when you think about the big problems that we face in society: climate change, income inequality, I mean these are big chewy problems that, you know aren't going to, humans, you just can't throw humans at the problem that's, that's been been proven. And I'm curious as to if, you know how you see it in terms of some of those other outcomes of, and the potential that is there. And, can you give us a glimpse as to what tech is involved underneath all of this? >> Sure. So, you know the first one outcomes you know that whole picture changes with the business cycle, right? I'd love to tell you that it's always these three outcomes, but, you know during downturns and business cycles cost-based outcomes are, you know, are paramount, because people are thinking about survival, right? In upticks, people are worried about, you know converting new business, growth, they're worried about net promoter score, they're worried about experience score. And then over the last 12 to 18 months, you know we've seen this whole concept of carbon footprint and sustainability all tied into the outcomes. So, hey, did you realize that shifting these 22 legacy applications from here to the cloud would reduce your carbon footprint by 3%? No. Right? And so, the big hitters are always, you know, the, the cost metric, the sort of time to value or the whole cycle time and the process and net promoter score. Those are generally in all of the, you know all the plays, obviously the bookends, you know around what's happening with, you know, the the economy, what's happening with carbon, what's happening with sustainability are always in there. Now on the technology side, boy, that's the cool part about working for IBM, right? Is that there's a new thing that shows up on my door every two weeks from either the math and science labs, or from a new ecosystem partner. And that's one of the things that I will say about you know, over the last 12 to 15 months, you've seen this massive shift from IBM to go away from pure blue, to embrace the whole ecosystem. So, you know, Dave the stuff I work with every day is you know, AI, computer vision, blockchain, automation, quantum, connected operations, not just software robots but now human robots, digital twin, all these things where we are digitally rendering what used to be a very paper-based legacy, right? So, boy, I couldn't be more excited to be a part of that. And then now with the opening up to all the hyperscalers, the Microsoft, the Google, the Amazon, the, you know, Salesforce, Adobe, all those folks, it's like a candy store. And quite honestly, my single greatest challenge is to kind of bring all of that together and point it at a series of three or four buyers at a chief marketing officer, experience officer for the whole customer piece. At a chief human resource officer around the town piece and at a CFO or a chief procurement officer for finance and supply chain. I'm sorry to answer, so, you know, long-winded, but it's, it's awesome out there. >> That was a great answer. And I think, you know, I joked the other day, Glenn that Milton Friedman must be turning over in his grave because he said, you know the only job of a company is to make profits for its shareholders and increase shareholder value. But, ironically, you know things like ESG, sustainability, climate change, they actually make business sense. So it's really not antithetical to, you know Friedman economics necessarily, but it's a good business. And I think, I think the other thing that I'm excited about is that there is some like deep tech we're seeing an explosion of of something as fundamental as processing power like we've never seen before, but he talks about, you know Moore's law being dead well, okay. With the doubling of of processor performance every 24 months, we're now at a quadrupling when you include GPU's and NPUs and accelerators and all that. I mean, that is going to power the the next wave of machine intelligence. And that really is exciting. >> Yeah. I, you know, it's I feel blessed every day to come to work that you know, I can, amass all these technologies and change how human beings experience service. I mean that's, man, that whole service experience that's what I've lived for, for, you know two and a half decades in my career, is to not to just to make and deploy stuff that's cool technically, but to change people's lives. I mean, that's it for me, that's, you know, that's that's the way that I want to ride, so I couldn't be more excited to do that stuff. >> Well Glenn thanks so much for coming on your passion shows right through the camera. And hopefully we're, face-to-face, you know, sometime soon maybe, maybe later on this year, but for sure. Knock on wood, 2022. All right. Hey, great to see you, thank you so much >> Dave. Same to you, thanks. Have a great rest of the day. >> All right, thank you. And thanks for following along with our continuing broadcast of IBM Think 2021, you're watching the cube the leader, digital tech coverage, be right back.
SUMMARY :
Think 2021 brought to you by IBM. Glenn, great to see you again. always a lot of fun to chat. Maybe you could talk a little bit I mean, that's really the winner is when I mean, a lot of the, you see a lot And to do that, you I mean, the downside, you mentioned RPA the last 12 to 15 months is, is a potential to amplify And so, you know I talked about the one of the, you know, the the first one outcomes you know And I think, you know, I you know, I can, amass you know, sometime soon Have a great rest of the day. the leader, digital tech
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Glenn Finch | PERSON | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Glenn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adobe | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 months ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rhode Island | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
3% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Anthem | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
22 legacy applications | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four buyers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
two and a half decades | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
one spot | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
about 70 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
this year | DATE | 0.93+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.91+ |
wave | EVENT | 0.9+ |
last 20 years | DATE | 0.88+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.88+ |
18 months | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Moore | PERSON | 0.86+ |
last five years | DATE | 0.85+ |
15 months | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Milton Friedman | PERSON | 0.8+ |
Friedman | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
three outcomes | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
every 24 months | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
COVID | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
challenge | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
a minute | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.66+ |
Anthem | TITLE | 0.64+ |
Think | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.62+ |
IBM | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.59+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.5+ |
COVID | TITLE | 0.5+ |
last | QUANTITY | 0.37+ |
2021 | TITLE | 0.33+ |
BOS9 Glenn Finch VTT
>>from >>Around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of IBM think 2021 brought to you by IBM >>Hello and welcome back to the cubes ongoing coverage of IBM Think 2021. The virtual edition, my name is David and I'm excited to introduce our next segment. We're going to dig into the intersection of machines and humans and the changing nature of work, worker productivity and the potential of humans with me is Glenn Finch, who's the global managing partner for data and ai at IBM Glenn great to see you again. Thanks for coming on. >>Dave good to be with you. Always a lot of fun to chat. >>So I'm interested in this concept that you've been working on about amplifying worker potential. You've got humans, you've got digital workers coming together and maybe you could talk a little bit about what you're seeing at that intersection. >>You know, it's um it's interesting for most of my career, I've always thought about um amplifying human worker potential. And you know I would say over the last five years we start to think about this concept of digital workers and amplifying their potential so that human potential can extend even further. What's cool is when we get them both to work together, amplifying digital worker potential. Amplifying human worker potential to radically change how services experienced by an end consumer. I mean that's really the winner is when you start seeing the end consumer, the end user fundamentally feeling the difference in the experience. >>I mean a lot of the you see a lot of the trade press and the journalists they like to focus on the sort of the negative of automation. But when you talk to people who have implemented things they take it, for example R. P. A. They're so happy that they're not have to do these menial tasks anymore. And then it sort of the interesting discussion is, okay well what are you what are you doing with your free time? What are you doing with your weekend? So how should we be thinking about that? What you what you called? Amplifying human worker potential? What has to occur for that outcome? >>You know? Um The all my life I've spent time making money for people, right? And this uh last year I was involved in a project where it fundamentally changed. It's tied to answer that exact question. You know the servicemen and women in America who are willing to risk their lives. Um you know for our country um they file claims for medical benefits. And on average it would take 15 days to get a response Actually for about 70 or 80 of them. We've taken that down to like 15 minutes and to do that. You can't just drop in a R. P. A. You can't just drop in a. I. It's not one thing right? It's this it's this seamless interaction between digital workers and human workers right? So that a lot of the more routine mundane tasks can be done by ai and robotics. But all of the really hard complex cases that only a human being can adjudicate. That's what the folks that were doing, the more monday work can can go focus on. So I mean God that's what makes me come to work every day is if I can change the life of a serviceman or woman that was willing to risk their lives for our country. So that's that's the concept now. The critical piece of what I said, it's not about implementing Ai and robotics anymore because a lot of that started to get very wrote but picking up on okay we've liberated this block of human capability. How do we reposition it? How do we re skillet? How do we get them to focus on new things? That's just as important. The human change aspect incredibly important. >>Yeah, I mean that's interesting because you're right. I mean the downside, you mentioned our P. A. A lot of it is paving the cow path and you know the human in the loop piece has been it's been missing and that's obviously changing. But what about the what about the flip side of that equation? Where you know you ask the question okay what can humans do that machines can't do that equation continues to evolve. But maybe you could talk about where you have amplified the digital worker potential. >>Yeah. So you know um one of our clients is anthem and you know we've you know they've been on a variety of programs with us to talk about this. But you know, we just recorded, um, you know, another session with them for think where, um, the chief technology officer came and talked about how they wanted to radically change their member experience. And when you think about the last year, I mean, I don't know. Dave, I know you travel a lot because I see you in all the places that I'm in, right? But I don't remember like 15 months ago, if you had to wait on the phone for two minutes, you thought it was an eternity, right? You're like, what's the matter with me? I'm a frequent flyer. I deserve a better service on this. Then as Covid started to roll around those wait times or two hours and then 30 days into Covid. If you got a call back within two days or two weeks, it was a blessing. Right? So all of our expectations changed in an instant. Right? So I have to say, over the last 12-15 months, that's where we've been spending a lot of our time in all of those human contact human touch places to radically transition the ability to be responsive, touch people with With the same experience that we had 15 months ago to get an answer back in two minutes. You can't get enough people right now to do that. And so we're forced to make sure that the digital experience is what that needs to be. So the digital worker has to be up and on and extending the brand. Experience the same way that the human worker was back when everybody could be at a call center. That makes sense. Yeah. I >>mean, I think I like about this conversation, Glenn is it's not an either or. It's not a zero sum game, which is kind of, it's sort of used to be. I mean, we've talked about this before. Humans have machines have always replaced humans at certain tasks, but never really a cognitive task. And that's why I think there's a lot of fear out there. But what you're talking about is is the potential to amplify both human and digital capabilities. And I think people might look at that and say, well wait a minute, is it isn't a zero sum game, but it's not explain why. >>Yes, So we're never finding the zero sum game because there is um there is always something for people to do, right? And so, you know, I talked about the one an amplification of digital worker at anthem, let me let me switch to an amplification of a human worker, right? So state of Rhode Island, Um you know, we had the great honor to work with their governor and their Department of Health and Human Services, around again, around the whole covid thing. We started out just answering basic questions and helping with contact tracing. And then from there we moved into helping them with their data and ai being able to answer questions. Why are there are hotspots? Why should I shut this person of the city down? Should I shut fires down? Should I do this? And the Governor and Health and human Services Director were constantly saying on press briefings in the morning. Well, you know, we learned from our partners, IBM, that we want to consider this, right? And we we did pinpoint vaccinations and and other things like that. To me, that's that whole continuum. So, you know, we liberated some people from one spot. They went to work in another spot. All human beings guided by ai so, you know, I think this is all about, you know, for the first time in our lives being able to realize sort of the vaulted member experience or client experience that everybody has already talked about using a blend of digital workers and human workers. It's just it's all about the experience. I think >>you're laying out some really good outcomes. You mentioned some of the folks in the military, the healthcare examples. Um and I'm struck because if you think about look at the numbers, I mean the productivity gains over the last 20 years, particularly in the US. and Europe, doesn't it's not the case for China the productivity exploding, but but it's gone down. And so when you think about the big problems that we face in society, um climate change, income inequality, I mean, these are big, chewy problems that, you know, what kind of humans, you just can't throw humans at the problem that's, that's been proven. Um, and I'm curious as to if you know how you see it in terms of some of those other outcomes of the potential that is there and, and, and can you give us a glimpse as to what tech is involved underneath all this? Sure. >>So, you know, um, the first of all on outcomes, you know, that whole picture changes with the business cycle, right? I'd love to tell you that it's always these three outcomes, but you know, during downturns in business cycles, costs based outcomes are, you know, are paramount because people are thinking about survival right? In upticks, people are worried about, you know, converting new business growth, they're worried about net promoter score, they're worried about experience score. And then Over the last 12 to 18 months, you know, we've seen this whole concept of carbon footprint and sustainability All tied into the outcomes. So hey, did you realize that shifting these 22 legacy applications from here to the cloud would reduce your carbon footprint by 3%? No. Right. And so, so you know, the big hitters are always, you know, the cost metric, the sort of time to value or the whole cycle time of the process and net promoter score. Those are generally in all of the, you know, all the plays, obviously the book ends, you know, around, um, what's happening with, you know, the, the economy, what's happening with carbon, what's happening with sustainability are always in there. Now, the technology side boy, that's the cool part about working for IBM, right, is that there is a new thing that shows up on my door every two weeks from either the math and science labs or from a new ecosystem partner. Right. And that's one of the things that I will say about over the last 12 to 15 months, you've seen this massive shift from IBM to to go away from pure blue to embrace the whole ecosystem. So you know, Dave the stuff I work with every day is, you know, ai computer vision, Blockchain automation, quantum uh connected operations. Uh not just software robots, but now human robots, Digital Twin, all these things where we are digitally rendering um what used to be a very paper based legacy. Right. So boy, I couldn't be more excited to be a part of that. And then now with the opening up to all the hyper scholars, the Microsoft, the google the amazon, the, you know, uh salesforce adobe, all those folks. It's like a candy store. And quite honestly, my single greatest challenge is to kind of bring all of that together and point it at a series of three or 4 buyers at a chief marketing officer experience officer for the whole customer piece, at a chief human resource officer around the town peace and at a CFO or a chief procurement officer for finance and supply chain. I'm sorry to answer. So, you know, long winded, but it's it's awesome out there. >>It was a great answer. And I think, you know, I joke the other day, glenn that Milton Friedman must be turned over his grave because he said, you know, the only job of a company has to make profits for shareholders and increase shareholder value. But but you're but but ironically, you know, things like E. S. G. Sustainability, his climate change, he said they actually make business sense. So it's really not antithetical to Friedman economics necessarily but it's good business. And I think I think the other thing that I'm excited about is that there is some like deep tech we're seeing an explosion of of something as fundamental as processing power like we've never seen before but he talks about Moore's law being dead. Well okay with the doubling of of of of processor performance every 24 months. We're now at a quadrupling when you include GPU S. And N. P. U. S. And accelerators and all. I mean that is gonna power the next wave of machine intelligence and that really is exciting. >>Yeah I am. You know it's I feel blessed every day to come to work that you know I can you know a mass all these technologies and change how human beings experience service. I mean that's man, that whole service experience. that's what I've lived for for, you know, 2.5 decades in my career is to not just just to make and deploy stuff. That's cool, technically, but to change people's lives. I mean, that's it for me. That's you know, that's that's the way that I want to ride. So I couldn't be more excited to do that stuff. Well, glad >>Thanks so much for coming on. Is your your passion shows right through the camera and hopefully we'll face to face, you know, sometime soon, maybe, maybe later on this year. But for sure Lockwood 2022. All right. Hey, great to see you. Thank you so much. >>Dave same to you. Thanks have a great rest of the day. >>All right. Thank you. And thanks for following along with our continuing broadcast of IBM think 2021 you're watching the cube the leader in digital tech coverage right back. Mhm. Yeah.
SUMMARY :
think 2021 brought to you by IBM Glenn great to see you again. Dave good to be with you. So I'm interested in this concept that you've been working on about amplifying worker potential. I mean that's really the winner is when you start seeing the end I mean a lot of the you see a lot of the trade press and the journalists they like to focus on the sort of the negative Um you know for our country um A lot of it is paving the cow path and you know the human in the loop piece has been it's been missing and that's But you know, we just recorded, um, you know, another session with them for And I think people might look at that and say, well wait a minute, is it isn't a zero sum game, And so, you know, I talked about the one an amplification of digital worker Um, and I'm curious as to if you know how you see it in the google the amazon, the, you know, uh salesforce adobe, And I think, you know, I joke the other day, glenn that Milton Friedman must to come to work that you know I can you know a mass all you know, sometime soon, maybe, maybe later on this year. Dave same to you. the cube the leader in digital tech coverage right back.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Glenn Finch | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
15 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Glenn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
30 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rhode Island | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 months ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
4 buyers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
22 legacy applications | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Department of Health and Human Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.98+ |
2.5 decades | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one spot | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
80 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
adobe | TITLE | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ | |
18 months | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Milton Friedman | PERSON | 0.94+ |
Moore | PERSON | 0.94+ |
R. P. A. | PERSON | 0.93+ |
Think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.93+ |
about 70 | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
last 20 years | DATE | 0.9+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Friedman | PERSON | 0.89+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
last five years | DATE | 0.87+ |
this year | DATE | 0.86+ |
three outcomes | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
think 2021 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.82+ |
a minute | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
God | PERSON | 0.81+ |
every two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
every 24 months | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
Covid | PERSON | 0.72+ |
wave | EVENT | 0.71+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
last | DATE | 0.67+ |
Health and human | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
months | DATE | 0.64+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.64+ |
15 months | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
monday | DATE | 0.59+ |
Covid | ORGANIZATION | 0.59+ |
12-15 | QUANTITY | 0.57+ |
U. S. | LOCATION | 0.55+ |
Lockwood | LOCATION | 0.54+ |
2022 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.38+ |
Breaking Analysis: The SolarWinds Hack & COVID are Forcing a Reinvention of Security
[Music] from the cube studios in palo alto in boston bringing you data-driven insights from the cube and etr this is breaking analysis with dave vellante top security pros indicate that the solar winds hack on top of the pandemic have further heightened a change in how they think about security not only musciso secure an increasingly distributed workforce and network infrastructure but they now must be wary of software code coming from reputable vendors including the very patches designed to protect them against cyber attacks hello everyone and welcome to this week's wikibon cube insights powered by etr in this breaking analysis we'll summarize cso sentiments from a recent etr venn session and provide our quarterly update of the cyber security sector now in an upcoming episode we'll be inviting eric bradley of etr to provide deeper analysis and insights on these trends but we wanted to give you a preliminary preview of what's happening in the sector as we start off 2021. now the solar winds attack was like nothing we've ever seen before it's been covered quite widely in the press but in case you don't know the details solarwinds is a company that provides software to monitor many aspects of largely on-prem infrastructure including things like network performance log files configuration data storage servers and the like now as with all software companies solarwinds sends out regular updates and patches hackers were able to infiltrate the update and trojanize the software meaning when customers installed the updates the malware just went along for the ride now the reason this is so insidious is that often hackers they're going to target installations that haven't installed patches or updates and identified vulnerabilities in the infrastructure that haven't been addressed doors that are open that haven't been closed if you will now here the very code designed to protect against the breach actually facilitated that breach now according to experts this was quite a sophisticated attack that most believe was perpetrated by the russian hacker group cozy bear an advanced persistent threat or apt as classified by the u.s government now it's suspected that somehow they fished their way into a github repo and stole username and password access to allow them to penetrate the supply chain of software that's delivered over the internet but public information on this attack it's still spotty people are still learning now what is known is that the attackers have been lurking since march of last year and they exfiltrated lots of information from the u.s government and many other high-profile companies now here's what the csos and the etr van had to say about it let me just read some of the quotes the impact of this breach is profound it really turned a lot of heads and conventions about cyber security i don't think this threat has been exaggerated in the media we're now in a situation where we have to monitor the monitors this attack didn't have any signatures of a previous attack so you got down to the code level 80 to 90 of that code is being downloaded from the internet it's bringing devops security processes and making us rethink how to reinvent security and i'll add my business friend val berkovici said to me on twitter last year that he thinks the government hack is going to have permanent implications on how organizations approach cyber security it seems these cisos agree now the one question is what can be done about this and when you talk to security pros they'll definitely tell you they're rethinking security practices but look there's only so much you can do here's a tag cloud summarizing some of what we hear in the cube community and in the venn from etr practitioners you hear a lot about xero trust many csos are really leaning into identity access management and pam and mandates around two-factor authentication we've talked a lot about firms like octa sale point cyber arc software and microsoft is coming up more and more in this conversation especially as octa is seen as setting a price umbrella there's definitely some frustration amongst csos about octa's pricing strategies and auth 0 which does authentication as a service that's hitting our radar as well now of course endpoint security is something we've talked a lot about as the work from home trend hit during the pandemic it's become much much more important and you can see in the growth of crowdstrike and as you see in a moment we're getting some traction with vmware and carbon black in the survey data and of course titanium is another company that we've talked about csos look they're not just going to rip out what they have so companies like cisco especially with umbrella and duo they come up in the conversation as does palo alto networks we've said many times palo alto is seen as a thought leader csos like them they also like fortinet especially those that may be more cost cost conscious we see that a lot in mid-market and so on with analytics micro-segmentation cloud security with z-scaler and even rpa to automate certain tasks uipath has come up in the conversation more and more in a security context so you look at this tag cloud and there's no one answer as is often the case case with cyber security lots of tools lots of disciplines and a very capable adversary who has learned to as they say live off the land using your own infrastructure and tooling against you now the common narrative is that security is a top priority with cios and csos and budgets are going to be up so let's take a look at that well kind of here's a chart that shows the net scores or spending momentum for various sectors of the etr tech taxonomy and we've highlighted the information security segment yes it's up relative to the october survey but it really doesn't stand out i mean everything's up as we've reported coming off a down year in tech spending minus four percent last year and we're forecasting a plus six to seven percent increase this year really depending on on the pace of their recovery but the point is cyber is one of many budget organizations and organizations they're simply not going to open up a blank check to the cso now part of the reason is they're heavily invested in cyber this graphic shows several sectors in context and we've highlighted security in the red box the vertical axis that shows spending velocity and the horizontal axis is market share or presence in the data set and you can see the security it's got a big presence it's pervasive of course but it lags some of the top sectors in terms of spending velocity because look organizations they've got lots of priorities and as you'll see in a moment this space like most mature markets has some companies with off the charts spending patterns and others that lag so let's dig into that a little bit here you see that same xy graphic and we've plotted a number of security players so there's a couple of points here that we want to make first microsoft as usual is off the charts to the right and amazingly has a net score of 48 percent so highly elevated octa continues to lead this pack in net score as it has the last several surveys it's got a net score of 61.5 percent up from last quarter survey octa crowdstrike cyberark fortinet proof point and splunk are all up nicely from last quarter's survey we also really want to highlight carbon black the company's net score last quarter was 23.9 percent with 134 mentions in this quarter its net score shot up to nearly 38 so a very meaningful and noticeable move for vmware's 2.1 billion dollar acquisition that it made in the summer of 2019. so a number of companies that have momentum which stems from a rebound in tech spending but also a shift in security spend that we've highlighted and you can see a couple of legacy security firms that are also there in the chart losing momentum we've highlighted fireeye and rsa okay so now let's dig deeper into the data and the vendor performance here's a view of the data that we first showed you in 2019 it shows the net score and the shared n which identifies the number of mentions within the sector and it's an indicator of presence in the marketplace the leftmost chart is sorted by netscore and the right-hand chart is sorted by shared n so to make this chart you had to have at least an n of 50 in the survey again you can see octa sale and sale point lead in net score and microsoft has the biggest presence in the right hand side along with cisco and palo alto and something we started two years ago was if a vendor shows up in the top 10 for both net score and shared n we anointed them with four stars so these are the four star companies microsoft palo alto octa and crowdstrike which crouch by the way it fell off but it's back on and i think that was probably a survey anomaly because based on the company's financials there has been no loss of momentum for crowdstrike and we give two stars to those companies that make the top 20 in both categories so cisco because of umbrella and duo splunk proofpoint fortinet z z-scaler cyborg and carbon black vmware carbon black is new to the two-star list due to its rapid rise in net score that we just talked about now just a quick aside on carbon black at vmworld 2019 pat gelsinger told john furrier and me that he felt like he got a great deal picking up carbon black for 2.1 billion dollars now his logic was in part based on the valuation of crowdstrike at the time which is of course carbon black competitor crowdstrike as you can see on this chart had a valuation that was at nine times higher than that of carbon black and you can see from the trailing 12-month revenue that crowdstrike was a significantly larger company by more than 100 million dollars in revenue so the real story though was the company's growth crowdstrike at the time was growing much much faster than carbon black at more than a hundred percent compared to carbon blacks 22 roughly now in vmware's recent earnings call they said that carbon black had good bookings performance so who knows exactly what that means but if it were more than 22 my guess is that vmware vmware would have been more effusive in its commentary so let's assume that since the acquisition carbon black growth has been flattish you know maybe down maybe up but probably flat so vmware they're figuring out how to integrate the company and we think that as it does that it's going to use its channel of distribution and global presence to really drive carbon black sales now nonetheless we would still peg carbon black's valuation of having increased pretty substantially since the time of the acquisition perhaps in the three to five billion range we don't know for sure so but a nice pickup in our view for vmware and it'll likely grow from here based on the etr data then that's very encouraging for carbon black now let's look at how the valuations in this sector have changed since before covid here's an updated view of our valuation matrix since just before the pandemic hit in the u.s as you can see the s p is up 16 from that time frame the nas composite up 43 percent wow now look at the others only splunk really hasn't seen a huge uptick in valuation but the others have either risen noticeably like proof point cyber arc sail point they bounced up like palo alto or fortinet or exploded like crowd chat octa and z scalar you combine all these and you're talking about 114 billion dollar increase in market cap for these so one would think carbon black as a vmware asset has done pretty well along with these names and we would expect that the tech spending rebound this year combined with the heightened concerns over the solar winds hack and the tectonic shifts from the accelerated work from home and digital business transformations will continue to bode well for many of these names for quite some time all right let's wrap it up with some of the things we're watching in this space as we exit the pandemic and experience a new digital reality cyber threats have never been greater look each january if you look back on the prior year you'd be able to say the same thing for the last couple of decades and the reality is the budgets and spending on cyber they're asymmetric to the economic risks we just don't spend enough and probably can't spend enough to solve this problem csos they have to balance their legacy legacy install base security infrastructure with the shift to zero trust accelerated endpoint new access management challenges the ever expanding cloud and dot dot dot lack of talent remains the single biggest challenge for organizations which are stretch thin making investments in automation a trend that is not going to abate anytime soon in cyber all the cliches apply there is no silver bullet there is no rest for the weary the adversary they are well funded and extremely capable and they only have to succeed once to create a business disaster for an organization that has to succeed every day 24 hours a day so expect more of the same with no end in sight in terms of complexity fragmentation and whack-a-mole approaches to fighting cyber crime i hate to say this but it just means the fundamentals for the sector just keep getting better and better sorry okay that's it for this week remember all these episodes are available as podcasts wherever you listen so please subscribe i publish weekly on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com and don't forget to check out etr.plus for all the survey data and the analytics i appreciate the comments on my linkedin post you can dm me at [Music] you
SUMMARY :
of the data that we first showed you in
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
23.9 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
134 mentions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2.1 billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two stars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
12-month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
61.5 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than 100 million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
vmware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
48 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
val berkovici | PERSON | 0.99+ |
43 percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two-star | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
eric bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both categories | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.99+ |
more than a hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
four stars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
u.s government | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
john furrier | PERSON | 0.98+ |
march of last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
four star | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five billion | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
solarwinds | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
summer of 2019 | DATE | 0.97+ |
one question | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
24 hours a day | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
russian | OTHER | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
seven percent | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
palo alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
last couple of decades | DATE | 0.96+ |
october | DATE | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
16 | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
this week | DATE | 0.94+ |
octa | TITLE | 0.94+ |
this quarter | DATE | 0.94+ |
vmworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
level 80 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ | |
single | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
2.1 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
github | TITLE | 0.92+ |
minus four percent | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
u.s | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
etr | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.91+ |
more than 22 | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
top 20 | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
a couple of points | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
this year | DATE | 0.88+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
nearly 38 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
about 114 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
octa sale point | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
top 10 | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
90 | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
covid | PERSON | 0.81+ |
both net score | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
two-factor | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.72+ |
lots of information | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
titanium | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
Mai Lan Tomsen Bukovec, AWS | theCUBE on Cloud 2021
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube presenting Cuban cloud brought to you by silicon angle. >>We continue >>with Cuban Cloud. We're here with Milan Thompson Bukovec, who's the vice president? Block and object storage at A W s, which comprise comprises elastic block storage, AWS s three and Amazon Glacier. Milan. Great to see you again. Thanks so much for coming on the program. >>Nice to be here. Thanks for having me, David. >>You're very welcome it So here we are. We're unpacking the future of cloud. And we'd love to get your perspectives on how customers should think about the future of infrastructure, things like applying machine intelligence to their data. But just to set the stage when we look back at the history of storage in the Cloud is obviously started with us three. And then a couple years later was introduced CBS for block storage. And those are the most well known services in the portfolio. But there's there's Mawr, this cold storage and new capabilities that you announced recently. It reinvent around, you know, super duper block storage and in tearing is another example. But it looks like AWS is really starting to accelerate and pick up the pace of customer >>options in >>storage. So my first question is, how should we think about this expanding portfolio? >>Well, I think you have to go all the way back to what customers air trying to do with their data. Dave, The path to innovation is paved by data. If you don't have data, you don't have machine learning. You don't have the next generation of analytics applications. That helps you chart a path forward into a world that seems to be changing every week. And so in orderto have that insight in orderto have that predictive forecasting that every company needs, regardless of what industry that you're in today. It all starts from data, and I think the key shift that I've seen is how customers are thinking about that data about being instantly usable, whereas in the past it might have been a backup. Now it's part of a data lake, and if you could bring that data into a data lake, you can have not just analytics or machine learning or auditing applications. It's really what does your application do for your business, and how can it take advantage of that vast amount of shared data set in your business. Awesome. >>So thank you. So I wanna I wanna make sure we're hitting on the big trends that you're seeing in the market. That kind of informing your strategy around the portfolio and what you're seeing with customers Instant usability. You you bring in machine learning into the equation. I think, um, people have really started to understand the benefits of of of cloud storage as a service on the pay paid by the drink and that whole whole model, obviously co vid has accelerated that cloud migration has accelerated. Anything else we're missing there. What are the other big trends that you see if any? >>Well, Dave, you did a good job of capturing a lot of the drivers. The one thing I would say that just sits underneath All of it is the massive growth of digital data year over year I. D. C. Says digital data is growing at a rate of 40% year over year, and that has been true for a while. And it's not going to stop. It's gonna keep on growing because the sources of that data acquisition keeps on expanding and whether it's coyote devices whether it is content created by users. That data is going to grow, and everything you're talking about depends on the ability to not just capture it and store it. But as you say, use it well, >>you know, and we talk about data growth a lot, and sometimes it becomes bromide. But I think the interesting thing that I've observed over the last a couple of decades really is that the growth is nonlinear on. It's really the curve is starting. Thio used to shape exponentially. You guys always talk about that flywheel. Effect it. It's really hard to believe, You know, people say trees don't grow to the moon. It seems like data does. >>It does. And what's interesting about working in the world of AWS storage Dave is that it's counterintuitive. But our goal without data growth is to make it cost effective. And so year over year, how could we make it cheaper and cheaper? Just have customers store more and more data so they can use it. But it's also to think about the definition of usage. And what kind of data is that? Eyes being tapped by businesses for their insights and make that easier than it's ever been before. Let me ask >>you a follow up question on that my life could I get asked this a lot? Or guy here comments a lot that yes, A W s continuously and rigorously reduces pricing. But it's just >>kind of >>following the natural curve of Moore's law or, you know, whatever. How >>do you >>respond to that? And there are other factors involved. Obviously, labor is another cost reducing factor. But what's the trend line say, >>Well, cost efficiencies in our DNA, Dave. We come to work every day and aws across all of our services, and we ask ourselves, How can we lower our costs and be able to pass that along to customers? As you say, there are many different aspects to cost. There's the cost of the storage itself is the cost of the data center. And that's really what we've seen impact a lot of customers that were slower or just getting started with removed. The cloud is they entered 2020 and then they found out exactly how expensive that data center was to maintain because they had to put in safety equipment and they had to do all the things that you have to do in a pandemic in a data center. And so sometimes that cost is a little bit hidden or won't show up until you really don't need to have it land. But the cost of managing that explosive growth of data is very riel. And when we're thinking about cost, we're thinking about cost in terms of how can I lower it on a per gigabyte per month basis? But we're also building into the product itself adaptive discounts like we have a storage class in S three that's called intelligent hearing. And in intelligence hearing, we have built in monitoring where, if particular objects aren't frequently accessed in a given month, ah, customer will automatically get a discounted price for that storage or a customer Can you know, as of late last year, say that they wanna automatically move storage in the storage class that has been stored, for example, longer than 100 and 80 days and saves 95% by moving it into archive storage, deep archives storage? And so it's not just, you know, relentlessly going after and lowering the cost of storage. It's also building into the products these new ways where we can adaptive Lee discount storage based on what a customer's storage is actually doing >>well. And I would, I would add to our audience, is the other thing that does has done is it's really forced transparency almost the same way that Amazon has done on retail. And now my mom, When we talked last I mentioned that s three was an object store. And of course, that's technically technically correct. But your comment to me was Dave. It's more than that. And you started to talk about sage Maker and AI and bringing in machine learning. And I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the future of how storage is gonna be leveraged in the cloud that's may be different than what we've been, you know, used to in the early days of s three and how your customers should be thinking about infrastructure not as bespoke services but as a suite of capabilities and maybe some of those adjacent adjacent services that you see as most leverage a ble for customers And why? >>Well, to tell this story, dude, we're gonna have to go a little bit back in time all the way back to the 19 nineties. Or before then, when all you had waas, a set of hardware appliance vendors that sold you appliances that you put in your data center and inherently created a data silo because those hardware appliances were hardwired to your application. And so an individual application that was dealing with auditing as an example wouldn't really be able to access the storage for another application. Because you know, the architecture er of that legacy world is tied to a data silo and s tree came out launched in 2000 and six and introduced very low cost storage. That is an object. And I'll tell you, Dave, you know, over the last 10 plus years, we have seen all kinds of data come into us three, whereas before it might have been backups or it might have been images and videos. Now a pretty substantial data set is our parquet files and orc files. Thes files are there for business analytics for more real time type of processing. And that has really been the trend of the future. Is taking these different files putting them in a shared file layer, So any application today or in the future can tap into that data. And so this idea of the shared file layer is a major trend that has been taking off for the last. I would say five or six years, and I expect that to not only keep on going, but to really open up the type of services that you can then do on that shared file layer and whether that sage maker or some of the machine learning introduced by our connect service, it's bringing together the data as a starting point. And then the applications can evolve very rapidly. On top of that, I want to >>ask your opinion about big data architectures. One of our guests, Jim Octagon E. She's amazing, uh, data architect, and she's put forth this notion of a distributed global mesh, and I picked him picking up on some of the comments. Andy Jassy made it at reinvent How essentially Hey, we're bringing a W s to the edge. We see the data center is just another edge. Notes. You're seeing this massive distributed system evolving. You guys have talked about that for a while, and data by its very nature is distributed. But we've had this tendency to put into it monolithic Data Lake or a data warehouse on bits sort of antithetical to that distributed nature. So how >>do >>you see that playing out? What do you see customers in the future doing in terms of their big data architectures? And what does that mean for storage? >>It comes down to the nature of the data and again, the usage and Dave. That's where I see the biggest difference in these modern data architectures from the legacy of 20 years ago is the idea that the data need drives the data storage. So let's taken example of the type of data that you always wanna have on the edge. We have customers today that need tohave storage in the field and whether the field of scientific research or oftentimes, it's content creation in the in the film industry or if it's for military operations. There's a lot of data that needs to be captured and analyzed in the field and for us, what that means is that you know we have a suite of products called Snowball and whether it's snowball or snow cone, take your pick. That whole portfolio of AWS services is targeted at customers that need to do work with storage at the edge. And so it you know, if you think about the need for multiple applications acting on the same data set, that's when you keep it in an AWS region. And what we've done in AWS storage is we've recognized that depending on the need of usage, where you put your data and how you interactive, it may vary. But we've built a whole set of services like data transfer to help make sure that we can connect data from, for example, that new snow cone into a region automatically. And so our goal Dave, is to make sure that when customers air operating at the edge or they're operating in the region, they have the same quality of storage service, and they have easy ways to go between them. You shouldn't have to pick. You should be able to do it all. >>So in the spirit of do it all, this is sort of age old dynamic in the tech business, where you've got the friction between the the best of breed and the integrated suite, and my question is around what you're optimizing for for customers. And can you have your cake and eat it too? In other words, why A W S storage does what makes a compelling? Is it because it's kind of a best of breed storage service? Or is it because it's integrated with a W S? Would you ever sub optimize one in in order to get an advantage to the other? Or can you actually, >>you >>know, have your cake and eat it, too? >>The way that we build storage is to focus on being both the breath of capabilities on the depth of capabilities. And so where we identify ah, particular need where we think that it takes a whole new service to deliver, we'll go build that service and example for that is FTP, our AWS sftp service, which you know there's a lot of sftp usage out there and there will be for a while because of the you know, the Legacy B two b type of architectures that still live in the business world today. And so we looked at that problem. We said, How are we gonna build that in the best depth way and the best focus? And we launched a separate service for them. And so our goal is to take the individual building blocks of CBS and Glacier and s three and make the best of class and the most comprehensive in the capabilities of what we can dio and where we identify very specific need. We'll go build a service for. But, Dave, you know, as an example for that idea of both depths and breath s three storage lands is a great example of that s three storage lands is a new capability that we launched last year. And what it does is it lets you look across all your regions and all your accounts and get a summary view of all your s three storage and whether that's buckets or, you know, the most active prefixes that you have and be able to drill down from that and that is built in to the S three service and available for any customer that wants to turn it on in the AWS Management Council. >>Right? And we we saw just recently made I called it super duper block storage. But you made some, you know, improvements and really addressing the highest performance. Um, I want to ask you So we've all learned about an experience the benefits of cloud over the last several years, and especially in the last 10 months during the pandemic. But one >>of >>the challenges, and it's particularly acute with bio is, of course, Leighton see and moving data around and accessing data remotely. It's It's a challenge for customers, you know, due to speed of light, etcetera. So my question is, how was a W s thinking about all that data that still resides on premises? I think we heard that reinvent. That's still 90% of the opportunities or or the workloads. They're still on Prem that live inside a customer's data center. So how do you tap into those and help customers innovate with on Prem data, particularly from a storage >>angle? Well, we always want to provide the best of class solution for those little Leighton see workloads, and that's why we launched Block Express just late last year. It reinvent and Black expresses a new capability and preview on top of our Iot to provisioned eye ops volume type, and what's really interesting about Block Express Dave, is that the way that we're able to deliver the performance of Block Express, which is sound performance with cloud elasticity, is that we went all the way down to the network layer and we customize the hardware software. And at the network Lehrer, we built a Block Express on something called SRD, which stands for a scalable, reliable diagrams. And basically, what is letting us to do is offload all of our EBS operations for Block Express on the Nitro card on hardware. And so that type of innovation where we're able Thio, you know, take advantage of modern cop commodity, multi tenant data center networks where we're sending in this new network protocol across a large number of network paths, and that that type of innovation all the way down to that protocol level helps us innovate in a way that's hard. In fact, I would say impossible for for other sound providers to kind of really catch up and keep up. And so we feel that the amount of innovation that we have for delivering those low latency workloads in our AWS cloud storage is is unlimited, really, Because of that ability to customize software, hardware and network protocols as we go along without requiring upgrades from a customer it just gets better and the customer benefits. Now if you want to stay in your data center, that's why we built outposts. And for outpost, we have EBS and we have s three for outposts. And our goal there is that some customers will have workloads where they want to keep them resident in the data center And for those customers, we want to give them that AWS storage opportunities as well. So >>thank you for coming back to block Express. So you call it in sand in the cloud eso Is that essentially you've you've comprises a custom built, essentially storage storage network. Is that is that right? What kind of what you just described? SRD? I think you call it. >>Yeah, it's SRT is used by other AWS services as well, but it is a custom network protocol that we designed to deliver the lowest latency experience on We're taking advantage of it with Block Express >>sticking with traditional data centers for a moment, I'm interested in your thoughts on the importance of the cloud you know, pricing approach I e. The consumption model to paid by the drink. Obviously, it's one of the most attractive features But But And I ask that because we're seeing what Andy Jassy first, who is the old Guard Institute? Flexible pricing models. Two of the biggest storage companies HP with Green Lake and Dell has this thing called Apex. They've announced such models for on Prem and and presumably, Cross Cloud. How >>do you think >>this is going to impact your customers Leverage of AWS cloud storage? Is it something that you have ah, opinion on? >>Yeah, I think it all comes down to again that usage of the storage And this is where I think there is an inherent advantage for our cloud storage. So there might be an attempt by the old guard toe lower prices or add flexibility. But the end of the day it comes down to what the customer actually needs to to. And if you think about gp three, which is the new E. B s volume, the idea with GP three is we're gonna pass along savings to the customer by making the storage 20% cheaper than GP two. And we're gonna make the product better by giving a great, reliable baseline performance. But we're also going to let customers who want to run work clothes like Cassandra on TBS tune their throughput separately, for example, from their capacity. So if you're running Cassandra, sometimes you don't need to change your capacity. Your storage capacity works just fine, but what happens with for example, Cassandra were quote is that you may need more throughput. And if you're buying hardware appliance, you just have to buy for your peak. You have to buy for the max of what you think, your throughput in the max of what your storage is and this inherent flexibility that we have for AWS storage and being able to tune throughput separate from IOP, separate from capacity like you do for GP three. That is really where the future is for customers having control over costs and control over customer experience without compromising or trading off either one. >>Awesome. Thank you for that. So another time we have remaining my line. I want to talk about the topic of diversity. Uh, social impact on Daz. Ah, woman leader, women executive on. I really wanna get your perspectives on this, and I've shared with the audience previously. One of my breaking analysis segments your your boxing video, which is awesome and eso so you've got a lot of unique, non traditional aspects to your to your life, and and I love it. But I >>want to >>ask you this. So it's obviously, you know, certainly politically and socially correct to talk about diversity, the importance of diversity. There's data that suggests that that that diversity is good both economically, not just socially. And of course, it's the right thing to do. But there are those. Peter Thiel is probably the most prominent, but there are others who say, You know what, >>But >>get that. Just hire people just like you will be able to go faster, ramp up more quickly, hit escape velocity. It's natural. And that's what you should dio. Why is that not the right approach? Why is diversity both course socially responsible, but also good for business? >>For Amazon, we think about diversity as something that is essential toe how we think about innovation. And so, Dave, you know, as you know, from listening to some of the announcements I reinvent, we launched a lot of new ideas, new concepts and new services in AWS and just bringing that lends down to storage U. S. Tree has been reinventing itself every year since we launched in 2000 and six. PBS introduced the first Son on the Cloud late last year and continues to reinvent how customers think about block storage. We would not be able Thio. Look at a product in a different way and think to ourselves Not just what is the legacy system dio in a data center today. But how do we want to build this new distributed system in a way that helps customers achieve not just what they're doing today, but what they want to do in five and 10 years? You can't get that innovative mindset without bringing different perspectives to the table. And so we strongly believe in hiring people who are from underrepresented groups and whether that's gender or it's related racial equality or if its geographic, uh, diversity and bringing them in tow have the conversation. Because those divers viewpoints inform how we can innovate at all levels in a W s >>right. And so I really appreciate the perspectives on that, and we've had a zoo. You probably know the Cube has been, you know, a very big advocate of diversity, you know, generally, but women in tech Specifically, we participated a lot. And you know, I often ask this question is, you know, as a smaller company, uh, I and some of my other colleagues in in small business Sometimes we struggle. Um and so my question is, how >>how do >>you go beyond What's your advice for going beyond, you know, the good old boys network? I think its large companies like AWS and the big players you've got a responsibility to that. You can put somebody in charge and make it you know, their full time job. How should smaller companies, um, that are largely white, male dominated? How should they become more diverse? What should they do? Thio increase that diversity? >>Well, I think the place to start his voice. A lot of what we try to dio is make sure that the underrepresented voice is heard. And so, Dave, any small business owner of any industry can encourage voice for your under represented or your unheard populations. And honestly, it is a simple as being in a meeting and looking around that table, we're on your screen as it were and asking yourself Who hasn't talked? Who hasn't weighed in particularly if the debate is contentious or even animated. And you will see, particularly if you note this. Over time you will see that there may be somebody and whether it's an underrepresented, a group or its ah woman whose early career or it's it's not. It's just a member of your team who happens to be a white male to who's not being hurt. And you can ask that person for their perspective. And that is a step that every one of us can and should do, which is asked toe, have everyone's voice at the table, toe listen and to weigh in on it. So I think that is something everyone should dio. I think if you are a member of an underrepresented groups, as for example, I'm Vietnamese American and I'm the female in Tech. I think it z something to think about how you can make sure that you're always taking that bold step forward. And it's one of the topics that we covered it at reinvent. We had a great discussion with a group of women CEOs, and a lot of it we talked about is being bolt, taking the challenge of being bold in tough situations, and that is an important thing, I think, for anybody to keep in mind, but especially for members of underrepresented groups, because sometimes Dave, that bold step that you kind of think of is like, Oh, I don't know if I should ask for that promotion or I don't know if I should volunteer for that project It's not. It's not a big ask, but it's big in your head. And so if you can internalize as a member of some, you know, a group that maybe hasn't heard or seen as much how you can take those bold challenges and step forward and learn, maybe fell also because that's how you learn. Then that is a way toe. Also have people learn and develop and become leaders in whatever industry it ISS. It's >>great advice, and I reminds me of, I mean, I think most of us can relate to that my land, because when we started in the industry, we may be timid. You didn't want to necessarily speak up, and I think it's incumbent upon those in a position of power. And by the way, power might just be running a meeting agenda to maybe calling those folks that are. Maybe it's not diversity of gender or, you know, our or race. And maybe it's just the underrepresented. Maybe that's a good way to start building muscle memory. So that's unique advice that I hadn't heard before. So thank you very much for that. Appreciate it. And, uh hey, listen, thanks so much for coming on the Cuban cloud. Uh, we're out of time and and really, always appreciate your perspectives. And you're doing a great job, and thank you. >>Great. Thank you, Dave. Thanks for having me and have a great day. >>All right? And keep it right, everybody. You're watching the cube on cloud right back.
SUMMARY :
cloud brought to you by silicon angle. Great to see you again. Nice to be here. capabilities that you announced recently. So my first question is, how should we think about this expanding portfolio? and if you could bring that data into a data lake, you can have not just analytics or What are the other big trends that you see if any? And it's not going to stop. that I've observed over the last a couple of decades really is that the growth is nonlinear And so year over year, how could we make it cheaper and cheaper? you a follow up question on that my life could I get asked this a lot? following the natural curve of Moore's law or, you know, And there are other factors involved. And so it's not just, you know, relentlessly going after And I wonder if you could talk a little bit about the future of how storage is gonna be leveraged in the cloud that's that you put in your data center and inherently created a data silo because those hardware We see the data center is just another And so it you know, if you think about the need And can you have your cake and eat it too? And what it does is it lets you look across all your regions and all your you know, improvements and really addressing the highest performance. It's It's a challenge for customers, you know, And at the network Lehrer, we built a Block Express on something called SRD, What kind of what you just described? Two of the biggest storage companies HP with Green Lake and Dell has this thing called Apex. But the end of the day it comes down to what the customer actually Thank you for that. And of course, it's the right thing to do. And that's what you should dio. Dave, you know, as you know, from listening to some of the announcements I reinvent, we launched a lot You probably know the Cube has been, you know, a very big advocate of diversity, You can put somebody in charge and make it you know, their full time job. And so if you can internalize as a member And maybe it's just the underrepresented. And keep it right, everybody.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
PBS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Peter Thiel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
first question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Green Lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
95% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CBS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Apex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
TBS | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Moore | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Mai Lan Tomsen Bukovec | PERSON | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Guard Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
19 nineties | DATE | 0.98+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
late last year | DATE | 0.97+ |
longer than 100 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
late last year | DATE | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
Cuban | OTHER | 0.94+ |
Milan Thompson Bukovec | PERSON | 0.94+ |
late last year | DATE | 0.94+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.94+ |
AWS Management Council | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
a couple years later | DATE | 0.91+ |
Leighton | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
last 10 months | DATE | 0.91+ |
EBS | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Jim Octagon E. | PERSON | 0.89+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
gp three | TITLE | 0.87+ |
Block Express | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.87+ |
S. Tree | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
Cloud 2021 | TITLE | 0.85+ |
Maribel Lopez & Zeus Kerravala | theCUBE on Cloud 2021
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube presenting Cuban cloud brought >>to you by silicon angle. Okay, we're back. Here. Live Cuban Cloud. And this is Dave. Want with my co host, John Ferrier Were all remote. We're getting into the analyst power half hour. Really pleased to have Maribel Lopez here. She's the principal and founder of Lopez Research and Zias Caraballo, who is the principal and founder of ZK research. Guys, great to see you. Let's get into it. How you doing? >>Great. How you been? Good, >>thanks. Really good. John's hanging in there quarantining and, uh, all healthy, So I hope you guys are too. Hey, Mary, But let's start with you. You know, here we are on 2021 you know, just exited one of the strangest years, if not the strangest year of our lives. But looking back in the past decade of cloud and we're looking forward. How do you see that? Where do we come from? Where we at and where we going >>When we obviously started with the whole let's build a public cloud and everything was about public cloud. Uh, then we went thio the notion of private cloud than we had hybrid cloud and multi cloud. So we've done a lot of different clouds right now. And I think where we are today is that there's a healthy recognition on the cloud computing providers that you need to give it to the customers the way they want it, not the way you've decided to build it. So how do you meet them where they are so that they can have a cloud like experience wherever they want their data to be? >>Yes and yes, you've, you know, observed, This is well, in the early days of cloud, you heard a lot of rhetoric. It was private cloud And and then now we're, you know, hearing a lot of multi cloud and so forth. But initially, a lot of the traditional vendors kind of pooh poohed it. They called us analysts. We said we were all cloud crazy, but they seem to have got their religion. >>Well, everything. Everyone's got a definition of cloud, but I actually think we are right in the midst of another transformation of clouds Miracle talked about. We went from, you know, private clouds, which is really hosting the public cloud to multi cloud hybrid cloud. And if you look at the last post that put on Silicon Angle, which was talking about five acquisition of Volterra, I actually think we're in the midst of the transition to what's called distributed Club, where if you look at modernized cloud apps today, they're actually made up of services from different clouds on also distributed edge locations. And that's gonna have a pretty profound impact on the way we build out, because those distributed edges be a telco edge, cellular vagina. Th whatever the services that lived there are much more ephemeral in nature, right? So the way we secure the way we connect changes quite a bit. But I think that the great thing about Cloud is we've seen several several evolutionary changes. So what the definition is and we're going through that now, which is which is pretty cool to think about, right? It's not a static thing. Um, it's, uh, you know, it's a it's an ongoing transition. But I think, uh, you know, we're moving into this distributed Cloudera, which to me is a lot more complex than what we're dealing with in the Palace. >>I'm actually pretty excited about that because I think that this move toe edge and the distribution that you've talked about, it's like we now have processing everywhere. We've got it on devices, we've got it in, cars were moving, the data centers closer and closer to where the action's happening. And I think that's gonna be a huge trend for 2021. Is that distributed that you were talking about a lot of edge discussion? You >>know what? The >>reason we're doing This, too, is we want. It's not just we're moving the data closer to the user, right? And some. If you think you brought up the autonomous vehicle right in the car being an edge, you think of the data that generates right? There's some things such as the decision to stop or not right that should be done in car. I don't wanna transport that data all the way back to Google him back to decide whether I want to stop. You could also use the same data determine whether drivers driving safely for insurance purposes, right? So the same data give me located at the edge or in a centralized cloud for different purposes, and I think that's what you know, kind of cool about this is we're being able to use our data and much different ways. Now. >>You know, it's interesting is it's so complex. It's mind blowing because this is distributed computing. Everyone kind of agrees this is where it is. But if you think about the complexity and I want to get your guys reaction to this because you know some of the like side fringe trend discussions are data sovereignty, misinformation as a vulnerability. Okay, you get the chips now you got gravitas on with Amazon in front. Apple's got their own chips. Intel is gonna do a whole new direction. So you've got tons of computer. And then you mentioned the ephemeral nature. How do you manage those? What's the observe ability look like? They're what's the trust equation? So all these things kind of play into it. It sounds almost mind blowing, just even thinking about it. But how do you guys, this analyst tryto understand where someone's either blowing bullshit or kind of like has the real deal? Because all those things come into play? I mean, you could have a misinformation campaign targeting the car. Let's say Hey, you know that that data is needs to be. This is this is misinformation who's a >>in a lot of ways, this creates almost unprecedented opportunity now for for starts and for companies to transform right. The fundamental tenet of my research has always been share shifts happen when markets transition and we're in the middle of the big one. If the computer resource is we're using, John and the application resource will be using or ephemeral nature than all the things that surrounded the way we secured the way we connect. Those also have to be equal, equally agile, right, So you can't have, you know, you think of a micro services based application being secured with traditional firewalls, right? Just the amount of, or even virtual the way that the length of time it takes to spend those things up is way too long. So in many ways, this distributed cloud change changes everything in I T. And that that includes all of the services in the the infrastructure that we used to secure and connect. And that's a that is a profound change, and you mentioned the observe ability. You're right. That's another thing that the traditional observe ability tools are based on static maps and things and, you know, traditional up, down and we don't. Things go up and down so quickly now that that that those don't make any sense. So I think we are going to see quite a rise in different types of management tools and the way they look at things to be much more. I suppose you know Angela also So we can measure things that currently aren't measurable. >>So you're talking about the entire stack. Really? Changing is really what you're inferring anyway from your commentary. And that would include the programming model as well, wouldn't it? >>Absolutely. Yeah. You know, the thing that is really interesting about where we have been versus where we're going is we spent a lot of time talking about virtual izing hardware and moving that around. And what does that look like? And that, and creating that is more of a software paradigm. And the thing we're talking about now is what is cloud is an operating model look like? What is the manageability of that? What is the security of that? What? You know, we've talked a lot about containers and moving into a different you know, Dev suck ups and all those different trends that we've been talking about, like now we're doing them. So we've only got into the first crank of that. And I think every technology vendor we talked to now has to address how are they going to do a highly distributed management and security landscape? Like, what are they gonna layer on top of that? Because it's not just about Oh, I've taken Iraq of something server storage, compute and virtualized it. I now have to create a new operating model around it. In a way, we're almost redoing what the OS I stack looks like and what the software and solutions are for that. >>So >>it was really Hold on, hold on, hold on their lengthened. Because that side stack that came up earlier today, Mayor. But we're talking about Yeah, we were riffing on the OSC model, but back in the day and we were comparing the S n a definite the, you know, the proprietary protocol stacks that they were out there and someone >>said Amazon's S N a. Is that recall? E think that's what you said? >>No, no. Someone in the chest. That's a comment like Amazon's proprietary meaning, their scale. And I said, Oh, that means there s n a But if you think about it, that's kind of almost that can hang. Hang together. If the kubernetes is like a new connective tissue, is that the TCP pipe moment? Because I think Os I kind of was standardizing at the lower end of the stack Ethernet token ring. You know, the data link layer physical layer and that when you got to the TCP layer and really magic happened right to me, that's when Cisco's happened and everything started happening then and then. It kind of stopped because the application is kinda maintain their peace there. A little history there, but like that's kind of happening now. If you think about it and then you put me a factor in the edge, it just kind of really explodes it. So who's gonna write that software? E >>think you know, Dave, your your dad doesn't change what you build ups. It's already changed in the consumer world, you look atyou, no uber and Waze and things like that. Those absolute already highly decomposed applications that make a P I calls and DNS calls from dozens of different resource is already right. We just haven't really brought that into the enterprise space. There's a number, you know, what kind of you know knew were born in the cloud companies that have that have done that. But they're they're very few and far between today. And John, your point about the connectivity. We do need to think about connectivity at the network layer. Still, obviously, But now we're creating that standardization that standardized connectivity all the way a player seven. So you look at a lot of the, you know, one of the big things that was a PDP. I calls right, you know, from different cloud services. And so we do need to standardize in every layer and then stitch that together. So that does make It does make things a lot more complicated. Now I'm not saying Don't do it because you can do a whole lot more with absolute than you could ever do before. It's just that we kind of cranked up the level of complexity here, and flowered isn't just a single thing anymore, right? That's that. That's what we're talking about here It's a collection of edges and private clouds and public clouds. They all have to be stitched together at every layer in orderto work. >>So I was I was talking a few CEOs earlier in the day. We had we had them on, I was asking them. Okay, So how do you How do you approach this complexity? Do you build that abstraction layer? Do you rely on someone like Microsoft to build that abstraction layer? Doesn't appear that Amazon's gonna do it, you know? Where does that come from? Or is it or is it dozens of abstraction layers? And one of the CEO said, Look, it's on us. We have to figure out, you know, we get this a p I economy, but But you guys were talking about a mawr complicated environment, uh, moving so so fast. Eso if if my enterprise looks like my my iPhone APs. Yes, maybe it's simpler on an individual at basis, but its app creep and my application portfolio grows. Maybe they talk to each other a little bit better. But that level of complexity is something that that that users are gonna have to deal >>with what you thought. So I think quite what Zs was trying to get it and correct me if I'm wrong. Zia's right. We've got to the part where we've broken down what was a traditional application, right? And now we've gotten into a P. I calls, and we have to think about different things. Like we have to think about how we secure those a p I s right. That becomes a new criteria that we're looking at. How do we manage them? How do they have a life cycle? So what was the life cycle of, say, an application is now the life cycle of components and so that's a That's a pretty complex thing. So it's not so much that you're getting app creep, but you're definitely rethinking how you want to design your applications and services and some of those you're gonna do yourself and a lot of them are going to say it's too complicated. I'm just going to go to some kind of SAS cloud offering for that and let it go. But I think that many of the larger companies I speak to are looking for a larger company to help them build some kind of framework to migrate from what they've used with them to what they need tohave going forward. >>Yeah, I think. Where the complexities. John, You asked who who creates the normalization layer? You know, obviously, if you look to the cloud providers A W s does a great job of stitching together all things AWS and Microsoft does a great job of stitching together all things Microsoft right in saying with Google. >>But >>then they don't. But if if I want to do some Microsoft to Amazon or Google Toe Microsoft, you know, connectivity, they don't help so much of that. And that's where the third party vendors that you know aviatrix on the network side will tear of the security side of companies like that. Even Cisco's been doing a lot of work with those companies, and so what we what we don't really have And we probably won't for a while if somebody is gonna stitch everything together at every >>you >>know, at every layer. So Andi and I do think we do get after it. Maribel, I think if you look at the world of consumer APS, we moved to a lot more kind of purpose built almost throwaway apps. They serve a purpose or to use them for a while. Then you stop using them. And in the enterprise space, we really haven't kind of converted to them modeling on the mobile side. But I think that's coming. Well, >>I think with micro APS, right, that that was kind of the issue with micro APS. It's like, Oh, I'm not gonna build a full scale out that's gonna take too long. I'm just gonna create this little workflow, and we're gonna have, like, 200 work flows on someone's phone. And I think we did that. And not everybody did it, though, to your point. So I do think that some people that are a little late to the game might end up in in that app creep. But, hey, listen, this is a fabulous opportunity that just, you know, throw a lot of stuff out and do it differently. What What? I think what I hear people struggling with ah lot is be to get it to work. It typically is something that is more vertically integrated. So are you buying all into a Microsoft all you're buying all into an Amazon and people are starting to get a little fear about doing the full scale buy into any specific platform yet. In absence of that, they can't get anything to work. >>Yeah, So I think again what? What I'm hearing from from practitioners, I'm gonna put a micro serve. And I think I think, uh, Mirabelle, this is what you're implying. I'm gonna put a micro services layer. Oh, my, my. If I can't get rid of them, If I can't get rid of my oracle, you know, workloads. I'm gonna connect them to my modernize them with a layer, and I'm gonna impart build that. I'm gonna, you know, partner to get that done. But that seems to be a a critical path forward. If I don't take that step, gonna be stuck in the path in the past and not be able to move forward. >>Yeah, absolutely. I mean, you do have to bridge to the past. You you aren't gonna throw everything out right away. That's just you can't. You can't drive the bus and take the wheels off that the same time. Maybe one wheel, but not all four of them at the same time. So I think that this this concept of what are the technologies and services that you use to make sure you can keep operational, but that you're not just putting on Lee new workloads into the cloud or new workloads as decomposed APS that you're really starting to think about. What do I want to keep in whatever I want to get rid of many of the companies you speak Thio. They have thousands of applications. So are they going to do this for thousands of applications? Are they gonna take this as an opportunity to streamline? Yeah, >>well, a lot of legacy never goes away, right? And I was how companies make this transition is gonna be interesting because there's no there's no really the fact away I was I was talking to this one company. This is New York Bank, and they've broken their I t division down into modern I t and legacy I t. And so modern. Everything is cloud first. And so imagine me, the CEO of Legacy i e 02 miracles. But what they're doing, if they're driving the old bus >>and >>then they're building a new bus and parallel and eventually, you know, slowly they take seats out of the old bus and they take, you know, the seat and and they eventually start stripping away things. That old bus, >>But >>that old bus is going to keep running for a long time. And so stitching the those different worlds together is where a lot of especially big organizations that really can't commit to everything in the cloud are gonna struggle. But it is a It is a whole new world. And like I said, I think it creates so much opportunity for people. You know, e >>whole bus thing reminds me that movie speed when they drive around 55 miles an hour, just put it out to the airport and just blew up E >>got But you know, we all we all say that things were going to go away. But to Zia's point, you know, nothing goes away. We're still in 2021 talking about mainframes just as an aside, right? So I think we're going to continue tohave some legacy in the network. But the But the issue is ah, lot will change around that, and they're gonna be some people. They're gonna make a lot of money selling little startups that Just do one specific piece of that. You know, we just automation of X. Oh, >>yeah, that's a great vertical thing. This is the This is the distributed network argument, right? If you have a note in the network and you could put a containerized environment around it with some micro services um, connective tissue glue layer, if you will software abstract away some integration points, it's a note on the network. So if in mainframe or whatever, it's just I mean makes the argument right, it's not core. You're not building a platform around the mainframe, but if it's punching out, I bank jobs from IBM kicks or something, you know, whatever, Right? So >>And if those were those workloads probably aren't gonna move anywhere, right, they're not. Is there a point in putting those in the cloud? You could say Just leave them where they are. Put a connection to the past Bridge. >>Remember that bank when you talk about bank guy we interviewed in the off the record after the Cube interviews like, Yeah, I'm still running the mainframe, so I never get rid of. I love it. Run our kicks job. I would never think about moving that thing. >>There was a large, large non US bank who said I buy. I buy the next IBM mainframe sight unseen. Andi, he's got no choice. They just write the check. >>But milliseconds is like millions of dollars of millisecond for him on his back, >>so those aren't going anywhere. But then, but then, but they're not growing right. It's just static. >>No, no, that markets not growing its's, in fact. But you could make a lot of money and monetizing the legacy, right? So there are vendors that will do that. But I do think if you look at the well, we've already seen a pretty big transition here. If you look at the growth in a company like twilio, right, that it obviates the need for a company to rack and stack your own phone system to be able to do, um, you know, calling from mobile lapse or even messaging. Now you just do a P. I calls. Um, you know, it allows in a lot of ways that this new world we live in democratizes development, and so any you know, two people in the garage can start up a company and have a service up and running another time at all, and that creates competitiveness. You know much more competitiveness than we've ever had before, which is good for the entire industry. And, you know, because that keeps the bigger companies on their toes and they're always looking over their shoulder. You know what, the banks you're looking at? The venues and companies like that Brian figure out a way to monetize. So I think what we're, you know well, that old stuff never going away. The new stuff is where the competitive screen competitiveness screen. >>It's interesting. Um IDs Avery. Earlier today, I was talking about no code in loco development, how it's different from the old four g l days where we didn't actually expand the base of developers. Now we are to your point is really is democratizing and, >>well, everybody's a developer. It could be a developer, right? A lot of these tools were written in a way that line of business people create their own APs to point and click interface is, and so the barrier. It reminds me of when, when I started my career, I was a I. I used to code and HTML build websites and then went to five years. People using drag and drop interface is right, so that that kind of job went away because it became so easy to dio. >>Yeah, >>sorry. A >>data e was going to say, I think we're getting to the part. We're just starting to talk about data, right? So, you know, when you think of twilio, that's like a service. It's connecting you to specific data. When you think of Snowflake, you know, there's been all these kinds of companies that have crept up into the landscape to feel like a very specific void. And so now the Now the question is, if it's really all about the data, they're going to be new companies that get built that are just focusing on different aspects of how that data secured, how that data is transferred, how that data. You know what happens to that data, because and and does that shift the balance of power about it being out of like, Oh, I've created these data centers with large recommend stack ums that are virtualized thio. A whole other set of you know this is a big software play. It's all about software. >>Well, we just heard from Jim Octagon e You guys talking earlier about just distributed system. She basically laid down that look. Our data architectures air flawed there monolithic. And data by its very nature is distributed so that she's putting forth the whole new paradigm around distributed decentralized data models, >>which Howie shoe is just talking about. Who's gonna build the visual studio for data, right? So programmatic. Kind of thinking around data >>I didn't >>gathering. We didn't touch on because >>I do think there's >>an opportunity for that for, you know, data governance and data ownership and data transport. But it's also the analytics of it. Most companies don't have the in house, um, you know, data scientists to build on a I algorithms. Right. So you're gonna start seeing, you know, cos pop up to do very specific types of data. I don't know if you saw this morning, um, you know, uniforms bought this company that does, you know, video emotion detection so they could tell on the video whether somebody's paying attention, Not right. And so that's something that it would be eso hard for a company to build that in house. But I think what you're going to see is a rise in these, you know, these types of companies that help with specific types of analytics. And then you drop you pull those in his resource is into your application. And so it's not only the storage and the governance of the data, but also the analytics and the analytics. Frankly, there were a lot of the, uh, differentiation for companies is gonna come from. I know Maribel has written a lot on a I, as have I, and I think that's one of the more exciting areas to look at this year. >>I actually want to rip off your point because I think it's really important because where we left off in 2020 was yes, there was hybrid cloud, but we just started to see the era of the vertical eyes cloud the cloud for something you know, the cloud for finance, the cloud for health care, the telco and edge cloud, right? So when you start doing that, it becomes much more about what is the specialized stream that we're looking at. So what's a specialized analytic stream? What's a specialized security stack stream? Right? So until now, like everything was just trying to get to what I would call horizontal parody where you took the things you had before you replicated them in a new world with, like, some different software, but it was still kind of the same. And now we're saying, OK, let's try Thio. Let's try to move out of everything, just being a generic sort of cloud set of services and being more total cloud services. >>That is the evolution of everything technology, the first movement. Everything doing technology is we try and make the old thing the new thing look like the old thing, right? First PCs was a mainframe emulator. We took our virtual servers and we made them look like physical service, then eventually figure out, Oh, there's a whole bunch of other stuff that I could do then I couldn't do before. And that's the part we're trying to hop into now. Right? Is like, Oh, now that I've gone cloud native, what can I do that I couldn't do before? Right? So we're just we're sort of hitting that inflection point. That's when you're really going to see the growth takeoff. But for whatever reason, and i t. All we ever do is we're trying to replicate the old until we figure out the old didn't really work, and we should do something new. >>Well, let me throw something old and controversial. Controversial old but old old trope out there. Consumerism ation of I t. I mean, if you think about what year was first year you heard that term, was it 15 years ago? 20 years ago. When did that first >>podcast? Yeah, so that was a long time ago >>way. So if you think about it like, it kind of is happening. And what does it mean, right? Come. What does What does that actually mean in today's world Doesn't exist. >>Well, you heard you heard. Like Fred Luddy, whose founder of service now saying that was his dream to bring consumer like experiences to the enterprise will. Well, it didn't really happen. I mean, service not pretty. Pretty complicated compared toa what? We know what we do here, but so it's It's evolving. >>Yeah, I think there's also the enterprise ation of consumer technology that John the companies, you know, you look a zoom. They came to market with a highly consumer facing product, realized it didn't have the security tools, you know, to really be corporate great. And then they had to go invest a bunch of money in that. So, you know, I think that waken swing the pendulum all the way over to the consumer side, but that that kind of failed us, right? So now we're trying to bring it back to center a little bit where we blend the two together. >>Cloud kind of brings that I never looked at that way. That's interesting and surprising of consumer. Yeah, that's >>alright, guys. Hey, we gotta wrap Zs, Maribel. Always a pleasure having you guys on great great insights from the half hour flies by. Thanks so much. We appreciate it. >>Thank >>you guys. >>Alright, keep it right there. Mortgage rate content coming from the Cuban Cloud Day Volonte with John Ferrier and a whole lineup still to come Keep right there.
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube presenting Cuban to you by silicon angle. You know, here we are on 2021 you know, just exited one of the strangest years, recognition on the cloud computing providers that you need to give it to the customers the way they want it, It was private cloud And and then now we're, you know, hearing a lot of multi cloud And if you look at the last post that put on Silicon Angle, which was talking about five acquisition of Volterra, Is that distributed that you were talking about and I think that's what you know, kind of cool about this is we're being able to use our data and much different ways. And then you mentioned the ephemeral nature. And that's a that is a profound change, and you mentioned the observe ability. And that would include the programming model as well, And the thing we're talking about now is what is cloud is an operating model look like? and we were comparing the S n a definite the, you know, the proprietary protocol E think that's what you said? And I said, Oh, that means there s n a But if you think about it, that's kind of almost that can hang. think you know, Dave, your your dad doesn't change what you build ups. We have to figure out, you know, we get this a p But I think that many of the larger companies I speak to are looking for You know, obviously, if you look to the cloud providers A W s does a great job of stitching together that you know aviatrix on the network side will tear of the security side of companies like that. Maribel, I think if you look at the world of consumer APS, we moved to a lot more kind of purpose built So are you buying all into a Microsoft all you're buying all into an Amazon and If I don't take that step, gonna be stuck in the path in the past and not be able to move forward. So I think that this this concept of what are the technologies and services that you use And I was how companies make this transition is gonna out of the old bus and they take, you know, the seat and and they eventually start stripping away things. And so stitching the those different worlds together is where a lot got But you know, we all we all say that things were going to go away. I bank jobs from IBM kicks or something, you know, And if those were those workloads probably aren't gonna move anywhere, right, they're not. Remember that bank when you talk about bank guy we interviewed in the off the record after the Cube interviews like, I buy the next IBM mainframe sight unseen. But then, but then, but they're not growing right. But I do think if you look at the well, how it's different from the old four g l days where we didn't actually expand the base of developers. because it became so easy to dio. A So, you know, when you think of twilio, that's like a service. And data by its very nature is distributed so that she's putting forth the whole new paradigm Who's gonna build the visual studio for data, We didn't touch on because an opportunity for that for, you know, data governance and data ownership and data transport. the things you had before you replicated them in a new world with, like, some different software, And that's the part we're trying to hop into now. Consumerism ation of I t. I mean, if you think about what year was first year you heard that So if you think about it like, it kind of is happening. Well, you heard you heard. realized it didn't have the security tools, you know, to really be corporate great. Cloud kind of brings that I never looked at that way. Always a pleasure having you guys Mortgage rate content coming from the Cuban Cloud Day Volonte with John Ferrier and
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Mary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Ferrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fred Luddy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Maribel Lopez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Angela | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York Bank | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Volterra | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zeus Kerravala | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ZK research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Mirabelle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Maribel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one wheel | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jim Octagon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lopez Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Zias Caraballo | PERSON | 0.98+ |
around 55 miles an hour | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first movement | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
15 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
first year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first crank | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Andi | PERSON | 0.97+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Zia | PERSON | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.96+ |
dozens | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
200 work flows | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.94+ |
Avery | PERSON | 0.93+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.92+ |
uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
single thing | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
earlier today | DATE | 0.9+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.89+ |
Google Toe | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
one company | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
tons of computer | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
dozens of abstraction layers | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Earlier today | DATE | 0.86+ |
Iraq | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
Os | TITLE | 0.85+ |
edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
Cuban Cloud | OTHER | 0.83+ |
twilio | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
Breaking Analysis: How Snowflake Plans to Change a Flawed Data Warehouse Model
>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE in ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> Snowflake is not going to grow into its valuation by stealing the croissant from the breakfast table of the on-prem data warehouse vendors. Look, even if snowflake got 100% of the data warehouse business, it wouldn't come close to justifying its market cap. Rather Snowflake has to create an entirely new market based on completely changing the way organizations think about monetizing data. Every organization I talk to says it wants to be, or many say they already are data-driven. why wouldn't you aspire to that goal? There's probably nothing more strategic than leveraging data to power your digital business and creating competitive advantage. But many businesses are failing, or I predict, will fail to create a true data-driven culture because they're relying on a flawed architectural model formed by decades of building centralized data platforms. Welcome everyone to this week's Wikibon Cube Insights powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, I want to share some new thoughts and fresh ETR data on how organizations can transform their businesses through data by reinventing their data architectures. And I want to share our thoughts on why we think Snowflake is currently in a very strong position to lead this effort. Now, on November 17th, theCUBE is hosting the Snowflake Data Cloud Summit. Snowflake's ascendancy and its blockbuster IPO has been widely covered by us and many others. Now, since Snowflake went public, we've been inundated with outreach from investors, customers, and competitors that wanted to either better understand the opportunities or explain why their approach is better or different. And in this segment, ahead of Snowflake's big event, we want to share some of what we learned and how we see it. Now, theCUBE is getting paid to host this event, so I need you to know that, and you draw your own conclusions from my remarks. But neither Snowflake nor any other sponsor of theCUBE or client of SiliconANGLE Media has editorial influence over Breaking Analysis. The opinions here are mine, and I would encourage you to read my ethics statement in this regard. I want to talk about the failed data model. The problem is complex, I'm not debating that. Organizations have to integrate data and platforms with existing operational systems, many of which were developed decades ago. And as a culture and a set of processes that have been built around these systems, and they've been hardened over the years. This chart here tries to depict the progression of the monolithic data source, which, for me, began in the 1980s when Decision Support Systems or DSS promised to solve our data problems. The data warehouse became very popular and data marts sprung up all over the place. This created more proprietary stovepipes with data locked inside. The Enron collapse led to Sarbanes-Oxley. Now, this tightened up reporting. The requirements associated with that, it breathed new life into the data warehouse model. But it remained expensive and cumbersome, I've talked about that a lot, like a snake swallowing a basketball. The 2010s ushered in the big data movement, and Data Lakes emerged. With a dupe, we saw the idea of no schema online, where you put structured and unstructured data into a repository, and figure it all out on the read. What emerged was a fairly complex data pipeline that involved ingesting, cleaning, processing, analyzing, preparing, and ultimately serving data to the lines of business. And this is where we are today with very hyper specialized roles around data engineering, data quality, data science. There's lots of batch of processing going on, and Spark has emerged to improve the complexity associated with MapReduce, and it definitely helped improve the situation. We're also seeing attempts to blend in real time stream processing with the emergence of tools like Kafka and others. But I'll argue that in a strange way, these innovations actually compound the problem. And I want to discuss that because what they do is they heighten the need for more specialization, more fragmentation, and more stovepipes within the data life cycle. Now, in reality, and it pains me to say this, it's the outcome of the big data movement, as we sit here in 2020, that we've created thousands of complicated science projects that have once again failed to live up to the promise of rapid cost-effective time to insights. So, what will the 2020s bring? What's the next silver bullet? You hear terms like the lakehouse, which Databricks is trying to popularize. And I'm going to talk today about data mesh. These are other efforts they look to modernize datalakes and sometimes merge the best of data warehouse and second-generation systems into a new paradigm, that might unify batch and stream frameworks. And this definitely addresses some of the gaps, but in our view, still suffers from some of the underlying problems of previous generation data architectures. In other words, if the next gen data architecture is incremental, centralized, rigid, and primarily focuses on making the technology to get data in and out of the pipeline work, we predict it's going to fail to live up to expectations again. Rather, what we're envisioning is an architecture based on the principles of distributed data, where domain knowledge is the primary target citizen, and data is not seen as a by-product, i.e, the exhaust of an operational system, but rather as a service that can be delivered in multiple forms and use cases across an ecosystem. This is why we often say the data is not the new oil. We don't like that phrase. A specific gallon of oil can either fuel my home or can lubricate my car engine, but it can't do both. Data does not follow the same laws of scarcity like natural resources. Again, what we're envisioning is a rethinking of the data pipeline and the associated cultures to put data needs of the domain owner at the core and provide automated, governed, and secure access to data as a service at scale. Now, how is this different? Let's take a look and unpack the data pipeline today and look deeper into the situation. You all know this picture that I'm showing. There's nothing really new here. The data comes from inside and outside the enterprise. It gets processed, cleanse or augmented so that it can be trusted and made useful. Nobody wants to use data that they can't trust. And then we can add machine intelligence and do more analysis, and finally deliver the data so that domain specific consumers can essentially build data products and services or reports and dashboards or content services, for instance, an insurance policy, a financial product, a loan, that these are packaged and made available for someone to make decisions on or to make a purchase. And all the metadata associated with this data is packaged along with the dataset. Now, we've broken down these steps into atomic components over time so we can optimize on each and make them as efficient as possible. And down below, you have these happy stick figures. Sometimes they're happy. But they're highly specialized individuals and they each do their job and they do it well to make sure that the data gets in, it gets processed and delivered in a timely manner. Now, while these individual pieces seemingly are autonomous and can be optimized and scaled, they're all encompassed within the centralized big data platform. And it's generally accepted that this platform is domain agnostic. Meaning the platform is the data owner, not the domain specific experts. Now there are a number of problems with this model. The first, while it's fine for organizations with smaller number of domains, organizations with a large number of data sources and complex domain structures, they struggle to create a common data parlance, for example, in a data culture. Another problem is that, as the number of data sources grows, organizing and harmonizing them in a centralized platform becomes increasingly difficult, because the context of the domain and the line of business gets lost. Moreover, as ecosystems grow and you add more data, the processes associated with the centralized platform tend to get further genericized. They again lose that domain specific context. Wait (chuckling), there are more problems. Now, while in theory organizations are optimizing on the piece parts of the pipeline, the reality is, as the domain requires a change, for example, a new data source or an ecosystem partnership requires a change in access or processes that can benefit a domain consumer, the reality is the change is subservient to the dependencies and the need to synchronize across these discrete parts of the pipeline or actually, orthogonal to each of those parts. In other words, in actuality, the monolithic data platform itself remains the most granular part of the system. Now, when I complain about this faulty structure, some folks tell me this problem has been solved. That there are services that allow new data sources to really easily be added. A good example of this is Databricks Ingest, which is, it's an auto loader. And what it does is it simplifies the ingestion into the company's Delta Lake offering. And rather than centralizing in a data warehouse, which struggles to efficiently allow things like Machine Learning frameworks to be incorporated, this feature allows you to put all the data into a centralized datalake. More so the argument goes, that the problem that I see with this, is while the approach does definitely minimizes the complexities of adding new data sources, it still relies on this linear end-to-end process that slows down the introduction of data sources from the domain consumer beside of the pipeline. In other words, the domain experts still has to elbow her way into the front of the line or the pipeline, in this case, to get stuff done. And finally, the way we are organizing teams is a point of contention, and I believe is going to continue to cause problems down the road. Specifically, we've again, we've optimized on technology expertise, where for example, data engineers, well, really good at what they do, they're often removed from the operations of the business. Essentially, we created more silos and organized around technical expertise versus domain knowledge. As an example, a data team has to work with data that is delivered with very little domain specificity, and serves a variety of highly specialized consumption use cases. All right. I want to step back for a minute and talk about some of the problems that people bring up with Snowflake and then I'll relate it back to the basic premise here. As I said earlier, we've been hammered by dozens and dozens of data points, opinions, criticisms of Snowflake. And I'll share a few here. But I'll post a deeper technical analysis from a software engineer that I found to be fairly balanced. There's five Snowflake criticisms that I'll highlight. And there are many more, but here are some that I want to call out. Price transparency. I've had more than a few customers telling me they chose an alternative database because of the unpredictable nature of Snowflake's pricing model. Snowflake, as you probably know, prices based on consumption, just like AWS and other cloud providers. So just like AWS, for example, the bill at the end of the month is sometimes unpredictable. Is this a problem? Yes. But like AWS, I would say, "Kill me with that problem." Look, if users are creating value by using Snowflake, then that's good for the business. But clearly this is a sore point for some users, especially for procurement and finance, which don't like unpredictability. And Snowflake needs to do a better job communicating and managing this issue with tooling that can predict and help better manage costs. Next, workload manage or lack thereof. Look, if you want to isolate higher performance workloads with Snowflake, you just spin up a separate virtual warehouse. It's kind of a brute force approach. It works generally, but it will add expense. I'm kind of reminded of Pure Storage and its approach to storage management. The engineers at Pure, they always design for simplicity, and this is the approach that Snowflake is taking. Usually, Pure and Snowflake, as I have discussed in a moment, is Pure's ascendancy was really based largely on stealing share from Legacy EMC systems. Snowflake, in my view, has a much, much larger incremental market opportunity. Next is caching architecture. You hear this a lot. At the end of the day, Snowflake is based on a caching architecture. And a caching architecture has to be working for some time to optimize performance. Caches work well when the size of the working set is small. Caches generally don't work well when the working set is very, very large. In general, transactional databases have pretty small datasets. And in general, analytics datasets are potentially much larger. Is it Snowflake in the analytics business? Yes. But the good thing that Snowflake has done is they've enabled data sharing, and it's caching architecture serves its customers well because it allows domain experts, you're going to hear this a lot from me today, to isolate and analyze problems or go after opportunities based on tactical needs. That said, very big queries across whole datasets or badly written queries that scan the entire database are not the sweet spot for Snowflake. Another good example would be if you're doing a large audit and you need to analyze a huge, huge dataset. Snowflake's probably not the best solution. Complex joins, you hear this a lot. The working set of complex joins, by definition, are larger. So, see my previous explanation. Read only. Snowflake is pretty much optimized for read only data. Maybe stateless data is a better way of thinking about this. Heavily right intensive workloads are not the wheelhouse of Snowflake. So where this is maybe an issue is real-time decision-making and AI influencing. A number of times, Snowflake, I've talked about this, they might be able to develop products or acquire technology to address this opportunity. Now, I want to explain. These issues would be problematic if Snowflake were just a data warehouse vendor. If that were the case, this company, in my opinion, would hit a wall just like the NPP vendors that proceeded them by building a better mouse trap for certain use cases hit a wall. Rather, my promise in this episode is that the future of data architectures will be really to move away from large centralized warehouses or datalake models to a highly distributed data sharing system that puts power in the hands of domain experts at the line of business. Snowflake is less computationally efficient and less optimized for classic data warehouse work. But it's designed to serve the domain user much more effectively in our view. We believe that Snowflake is optimizing for business effectiveness, essentially. And as I said before, the company can probably do a better job at keeping passionate end users from breaking the bank. But as long as these end users are making money for their companies, I don't think this is going to be a problem. Let's look at the attributes of what we're proposing around this new architecture. We believe we'll see the emergence of a total flip of the centralized and monolithic big data systems that we've known for decades. In this architecture, data is owned by domain-specific business leaders, not technologists. Today, it's not much different in most organizations than it was 20 years ago. If I want to create something of value that requires data, I need to cajole, beg or bribe the technology and the data team to accommodate. The data consumers are subservient to the data pipeline. Whereas in the future, we see the pipeline as a second class citizen, with a domain expert is elevated. In other words, getting the technology and the components of the pipeline to be more efficient is not the key outcome. Rather, the time it takes to envision, create, and monetize a data service is the primary measure. The data teams are cross-functional and live inside the domain versus today's structure where the data team is largely disconnected from the domain consumer. Data in this model, as I said, is not the exhaust coming out of an operational system or an external source that is treated as generic and stuffed into a big data platform. Rather, it's a key ingredient of a service that is domain-driven and monetizable. And the target system is not a warehouse or a lake. It's a collection of connected domain-specific datasets that live in a global mesh. What is a distributed global data mesh? A data mesh is a decentralized architecture that is domain aware. The datasets in the system are purposely designed to support a data service or data product, if you prefer. The ownership of the data resides with the domain experts because they have the most detailed knowledge of the data requirement and its end use. Data in this global mesh is governed and secured, and every user in the mesh can have access to any dataset as long as it's governed according to the edicts of the organization. Now, in this model, the domain expert has access to a self-service and obstructed infrastructure layer that is supported by a cross-functional technology team. Again, the primary measure of success is the time it takes to conceive and deliver a data service that could be monetized. Now, by monetize, we mean a data product or data service that it either cuts cost, it drives revenue, it saves lives, whatever the mission is of the organization. The power of this model is it accelerates the creation of value by putting authority in the hands of those individuals who are closest to the customer and have the most intimate knowledge of how to monetize data. It reduces the diseconomies at scale of having a centralized or a monolithic data architecture. And it scales much better than legacy approaches because the atomic unit is a data domain, not a monolithic warehouse or a lake. Zhamak Dehghani is a software engineer who is attempting to popularize the concept of a global mesh. Her work is outstanding, and it's strengthened our belief that practitioners see this the same way that we do. And to paraphrase her view, "A domain centric system must be secure and governed with standard policies across domains." It has to be trusted. As I said, nobody's going to use data they don't trust. It's got to be discoverable via a data catalog with rich metadata. The data sets have to be self-describing and designed for self-service. Accessibility for all users is crucial as is interoperability, without which distributed systems, as we know, fail. So what does this all have to do with Snowflake? As I said, Snowflake is not just a data warehouse. In our view, it's always had the potential to be more. Our assessment is that attacking the data warehouse use cases, it gave Snowflake a straightforward easy-to-understand narrative that allowed it to get a foothold in the market. Data warehouses are notoriously expensive, cumbersome, and resource intensive, but they're a critical aspect to reporting and analytics. So it was logical for Snowflake to target on-premise legacy data warehouses and their smaller cousins, the datalakes, as early use cases. By putting forth and demonstrating a simple data warehouse alternative that can be spun up quickly, Snowflake was able to gain traction, demonstrate repeatability, and attract the capital necessary to scale to its vision. This chart shows the three layers of Snowflake's architecture that have been well-documented. The separation of compute and storage, and the outer layer of cloud services. But I want to call your attention to the bottom part of the chart, the so-called Cloud Agnostic Layer that Snowflake introduced in 2018. This layer is somewhat misunderstood. Not only did Snowflake make its Cloud-native database compatible to run on AWS than Azure in the 2020 GCP, what Snowflake has done is to obstruct cloud infrastructure complexity and create what it calls the data cloud. What's the data cloud? We don't believe the data cloud is just a marketing term that doesn't have any substance. Just as SAS is Simplified Application Software and iOS made it possible to eliminate the value drain associated with provisioning infrastructure, a data cloud, in concept, can simplify data access, and break down fragmentation and enable shared data across the globe. Snowflake, they have a first mover advantage in this space, and we see a number of fundamental aspects that comprise a data cloud. First, massive scale with virtually unlimited compute and storage resource that are enabled by the public cloud. We talk about this a lot. Second is a data or database architecture that's built to take advantage of native public cloud services. This is why Frank Slootman says, "We've burned the boats. We're not ever doing on-prem. We're all in on cloud and cloud native." Third is an obstruction layer that hides the complexity of infrastructure. and fourth is a governed and secured shared access system where any user in the system, if allowed, can get access to any data in the cloud. So a key enabler of the data cloud is this thing called the global data mesh. Now, earlier this year, Snowflake introduced its global data mesh. Over the course of its recent history, Snowflake has been building out its data cloud by creating data regions, strategically tapping key locations of AWS regions and then adding Azure and GCP. The complexity of the underlying cloud infrastructure has been stripped away to enable self-service, and any Snowflake user becomes part of this global mesh, independent of the cloud that they're on. Okay. So now, let's go back to what we were talking about earlier. Users in this mesh will be our domain owners. They're building monetizable services and products around data. They're most likely dealing with relatively small read only datasets. They can adjust data from any source very easily and quickly set up security and governance to enable data sharing across different parts of an organization, or, very importantly, an ecosystem. Access control and governance is automated. The data sets are addressable. The data owners have clearly defined missions and they own the data through the life cycle. Data that is specific and purposely shaped for their missions. Now, you're probably asking, "What happens to the technical team and the underlying infrastructure and the cluster it's in? How do I get the compute close to the data? And what about data sovereignty and the physical storage later, and the costs?" All these are good questions, and I'm not saying these are trivial. But the answer is these are implementation details that are pushed to a self-service layer managed by a group of engineers that serves the data owners. And as long as the domain expert/data owner is driving monetization, this piece of the puzzle becomes self-funding. As I said before, Snowflake has to help these users to optimize their spend with predictive tooling that aligns spend with value and shows ROI. While there may not be a strong motivation for Snowflake to do this, my belief is that they'd better get good at it or someone else will do it for them and steal their ideas. All right. Let me end with some ETR data to show you just how Snowflake is getting a foothold on the market. Followers of this program know that ETR uses a consistent methodology to go to its practitioner base, its buyer base each quarter and ask them a series of questions. They focus on the areas that the technology buyer is most familiar with, and they ask a series of questions to determine the spending momentum around a company within a specific domain. This chart shows one of my favorite examples. It shows data from the October ETR survey of 1,438 respondents. And it isolates on the data warehouse and database sector. I know I just got through telling you that the world is going to change and Snowflake's not a data warehouse vendor, but there's no construct today in the ETR dataset to cut a data cloud or globally distributed data mesh. So you're going to have to deal with this. What this chart shows is net score in the y-axis. That's a measure of spending velocity, and it's calculated by asking customers, "Are you spending more or less on a particular platform?" And then subtracting the lesses from the mores. It's more granular than that, but that's the basic concept. Now, on the x-axis is market share, which is ETR's measure of pervasiveness in the survey. You can see superimposed in the upper right-hand corner, a table that shows the net score and the shared N for each company. Now, shared N is the number of mentions in the dataset within, in this case, the data warehousing sector. Snowflake, once again, leads all players with a 75% net score. This is a very elevated number and is higher than that of all other players, including the big cloud companies. Now, we've been tracking this for a while, and Snowflake is holding firm on both dimensions. When Snowflake first hit the dataset, it was in the single digits along the horizontal axis and continues to creep to the right as it adds more customers. Now, here's another chart. I call it the wheel chart that breaks down the components of Snowflake's net score or spending momentum. The lime green is new adoption, the forest green is customers spending more than 5%, the gray is flat spend, the pink is declining by more than 5%, and the bright red is retiring the platform. So you can see the trend. It's all momentum for this company. Now, what Snowflake has done is they grabbed a hold of the market by simplifying data warehouse. But the strategic aspect of that is that it enables the data cloud leveraging the global mesh concept. And the company has introduced a data marketplace to facilitate data sharing across ecosystems. This is all about network effects. In the mid to late 1990s, as the internet was being built out, I worked at IDG with Bob Metcalfe, who was the publisher of InfoWorld. During that time, we'd go on speaking tours all over the world, and I would listen very carefully as he applied Metcalfe's law to the internet. Metcalfe's law states that the value of the network is proportional to the square of the number of connected nodes or users on that system. Said another way, while the cost of adding new nodes to a network scales linearly, the consequent value scores scales exponentially. Now, apply that to the data cloud. The marginal cost of adding a user is negligible, practically zero, but the value of being able to access any dataset in the cloud... Well, let me just say this. There's no limitation to the magnitude of the market. My prediction is that this idea of a global mesh will completely change the way leading companies structure their businesses and, particularly, their data architectures. It will be the technologists that serve domain specialists as it should be. Okay. Well, what do you think? DM me @dvellante or email me at david.vellante@siliconangle.com or comment on my LinkedIn? Remember, these episodes are all available as podcasts, so please subscribe wherever you listen. I publish weekly on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com, and don't forget to check out etr.plus for all the survey analysis. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching. Be well, and we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
This is Breaking Analysis and the data team to accommodate.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank Slootman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bob Metcalfe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Zhamak Dehghani | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Metcalfe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
November 17th | DATE | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | TITLE | 0.99+ |
1,438 respondents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
david.vellante@siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
more than 5% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
theCUBE Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020s | DATE | 0.99+ |
Snowflake Data Cloud Summit | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both dimensions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
iOS | TITLE | 0.99+ |
DSS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
1980s | DATE | 0.99+ |
each company | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
decades ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2010s | DATE | 0.98+ |
each quarter | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Third | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
earlier this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Pure | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
IDG | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Today | DATE | 0.97+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Decision Support Systems | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
single digits | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Spark | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Legacy EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Kafka | TITLE | 0.94+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ | |
Snowflake | EVENT | 0.92+ |
first mover | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.91+ |
InfoWorld | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
dozens and | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
mid to | DATE | 0.91+ |
Jeff Boudreau, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2020
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Dell Technologies. World Digital experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. Hello, everyone. And welcome back to the cubes Coverage of Del Tech World 2020. With me is Jeff Boudreau, the president general manager of Infrastructure Solutions group Deltek. Jeff, always good to see you, my friend. How you doing? >>Good. Good to see you. >>I wish we were hanging out a Sox game or a pat's game, but, uh, I guess this will dio But, you know, it was about a year ago when you took over leadership of I s G. I actually had way had that sort of brief conversation. You were in the room with Jeff Clark. I thought it was a great, great choice. How you doing? How you feeling Any sort of key moments the past 12 months that you you feel like sharing? >>Sure. So I first I want to say, I do remember that about a year ago. So thank you for reminding me. Yeah, it's, uh it's been a very interesting year, right? It's been it's been one year. It was in September was one year since I took over I s G. But I'm feeling great. So thank you for asking. I hope you're doing the same. And I'm really optimistic about where we are and where we're heading. Aziz, you know, it's been an extremely challenging year in a very unpredictable year, as we've all experienced. And I'd say for the, you know, the first part of the year, especially starting in March on I've been really focused on the health and safety of our, you know, the families, our customers and our team members of the team on a lot of it's been shifting, you know, in regards to helping our customers around, you know, work from home or education and learn from home. And, you know, during all this time, though, I'll tell you, as a team, we've accomplished a lot. There's a handful of things that I'm very proud of, you know, first and foremost, that states around the customer experience we have delivered on our best quality in our product. NPS scores in our entire history. So something I'm extremely proud of during this time around our innovation and innovation engine, we part of the entire portfolio which you're well aware of. We had nine launches in nine weeks back in that May in June. Timeframe. So something I'm really proud of the team on, uh, on. Then last, I'd say it's around the team and right, we shifted about 90% of our workforce from the office tow home, you know, from an engineering team. That could be, you know, 85% of my team is engineers and writing code. And so, you know, people were concerned about that. But we didn't skip a beat, so, you know, pretty impressed by the team and what they've done there. So, you know, the strategy remains unchanged. Uh, you know, we're focused on our customers integrating across the entire portfolio and the businesses like VM ware and really focused on getting share. So despite all the uncertainty in the market, I'm pretty pleased with the team and everything that's been going on. So uh, yeah, it's it's been it's been an interesting year, but it's really great. I'm really optimistic about what we have in front of us. >>Yeah, I mean, there's not much you could do a control about the macro condition on it, you know it. Z dealt to us and we have to deal with it. I mean, in your space. It's the sort of countervailing things here one is. Look, you're not selling laptops and endpoint security. That's not your business right in the data center. Eso. But the flip side of that is you mentioned your portfolio refresh. You know, things like Power Store. You got product cycles now kicking in. So that could be, you know, a buffer. What are you seeing with Power Store and what's the uptake look like? They're >>sure. Well, specifically, let me take a step back and the regards the portfolio. So first, you know, the portfolio itself is a direct reflection in the feedback from all our partners and our customers over the last couple of years on Day two, ramp up that innovation. I spent a lot of time in the last few years simplifying under the power brands, which you're well aware of, right? So we had a lot of for a legacy EMC and Legacy dollars. Really? How do we simplify under a set of brands really over delivering innovation on a fewer set of products that really accelerating in exceeding customer needs? And we did that across the board. So from power edge servers, you know, power Max, the high end storage, the Powerball, all that we didn't hear one. And just most recently. And, you know, it's part of the big launches. We had power scale. We have power flex for software to find. And, of course, the new flagship offer for the mid range, which is power store. Um, Specifically, the policy of the momentum has been building since our launch back in May. And the feedback from our partners and our customers has been fantastic. And we've had a lot of big wins against, you know, a lot of a lot of our core competitors. A couple examples one is Arrow Electronics SAA, Fortune 500 Global Elektronik supplier. They leverage power Store to provide, you know, basically both, you know, enterprise computing and storage needs for their for their broader bases around the world on there, really taking advantage of the 41 data reduction, really helping them simplify their capacity planning and really improve operational efficiencies specifically without impacting performance. So it's it's one. We're given the data reductions, but there's no impact on performance, which is a huge value proffer for arrow another big customers tickets and write a global law firm on their reporting to us that over 90 they've had a 90% reduction in their rack space, and they've had over five times two performance over a core competitors storage systems azi. They've deployed power store around the world, really, and it's really been helping them. Thio easily migrate workloads across, so the feedback from the customers and partners has been extremely positive. Um, there really citing benefits around the architecture, the flexibility architecture around the micro services, the containers they're loving, the D M or integration. They're loving the height of the predictable data reduction capabilities in line with in line performance or no performance penalties with data efficiencies, the workload support, I'd say the other big things around the anytime upgrades is another big thing that customers we're really talking about so very excited and optimistic in regards as we continue to re empower store the second half of the year into next year really is the full full year for power store. >>So can I ask you about that? That in line data reduction with no performance hit is that new ipe? I mean, you're not doing some kind of batch data reduction, right? >>No, it's It's new, I p. It's all patented. We've actually done a lot of work in regards to our technologies. There's some of the things we talk about GPS and deep use and smart Knicks and things like that. We've used some offload engines to help with that. So between the software and the hardware, we've had leverage new I. P. So we can actually provide that predictable data reduction. But right with the performance customers need, So we're not gonna have a trade off in regards. You get more efficiencies and less performance or more performance and less efficiency. >>That's interesting. Yeah, when I talked to the chip guys, they talk about this sort of the storage offloads and other offloads we're seeing. These alternative processors really start to hit the market videos. The obvious one. But you're seeing others. Aziz. Well, you're really it sounds like you're taking advantage of that. >>Yeah, it's a huge benefit. I mean, we should, you know, with our partners, if it's Intel's and in videos and folks like that broad comes, it's really leveraging the great innovation that they do, plus our innovation. So if you know the sum of the parts, can you know equal Mauritz a benefit to our customers in the other day? That's what it's all about. >>So it sounds like Cove. It hasn't changed your strategy. I was talking toe Dennis Hoffman and he was saying, Look, you know, fundamentally, we're executing on the same strategy. You know, tactically, there's things that we do differently. But what's your summarize your strategy coming in tow 2021. You know, we're still early in this decade. What are you seeing is the trends that you're trying to take advantage of? What do you excited about? Maybe some things that keep you up at night? >>Yeah, so I'd say, you know, I'll stay with what Dennis said. You know, it's our strategy is not changing its a company. You probably got that from Michael and from job, obviously, Dennis just recently. But for me, it's a two pronged approach. One's all about winning the consolidation in the core infrastructure markets that we could just paid in today. So I think Service Storage Network, we're already clear leader across all those segments that we serve in our you know, we'll continue to innovate within our existing product categories. And you saw that with the nine launches in the nine weeks in my point on that one is we're gonna always make sure that we have best debris offers. If it's a three tier, two tier or converge or hyper converged offer, we wanna make sure that we serve that and have the best innovation possible. In addition to that, though, the secondary piece of the strategy really is around. How do we differentiate value across or innovating across I S G? You know, Dell Technologies and even the broader ecosystems and some of the examples I'll give you right now that we're doing is if you think about innovating across icy, that's all about providing improved customer experience, a set of solutions and offers that really helped simplify customer operations, right? And really give them better T CEOs or better. S L. A. An example of something like that's cloud like it's a SAS based off of that we have. That really helps provide great insights and telemetry to our customers. That helps them simplify their I T operations, and it's a major step forward towards, you know, autonomous infrastructure which is really what they're asking for. Customers of a very happy with the work we've done around Day one, you know, faster, time to value. But now it's like Day two and beyond. How do you really helped me Kinda accelerate the operations and really take that away from a three other big pieces innovating across all technologies. And you know, we do this with VM Ware now live today, and that's just writing. So things like VX rail is an example where we work together and where the clear leader in H C I. Things like Delta Cloud Uh, when we built in V M V C F A, B, M or cloud foundation in Tan Xue delivering an industry leading hybrid cloud platform just recently a VM world. I'm sure you heard about it, but Project Monterey was just announced, and that's an effort we're doing with VM Ware and some other partners. They're really about the next generation of infrastructure. Um, you know, I guess taking it up a notch out of the infrastructure and I've g phase, you know, some of the areas that we're gonna be looking at the end to end solutions to help our customers around six key areas. I'm sure John Rose talking about the past, but things like cloud Edge five g A i m l data management security. So those will be the big things. You'll see us lean into a Z strategies consistent. Some big themes that you'll see us lean into going into next year. >>Yeah, I mean, it is consistent, right? You guys have always tried to ride the waves, vector your portfolio into those waves and add value. I'm particularly impressed with your focus on customer experience, and I think that's a huge deal. You know, in the past, a lot of companies yours included your predecessor. You see, Hey, throwing so many products at me, I can't I don't understand the portfolio. So I mean, focusing on that I think is huge right now because people want that experience, you know, to be mawr cloudlike. And that's that's what you got to deliver. What about any news from from Dell Tech world? Any any announcements that you you wanna highlight that we could talk about? >>Sure. And actually, just touching back on the point you had no about the simplification that is a major 10 of my in regards the organization. So there's three key components that I drive once around customer focus, and that's keeping customers first and foremost. And everything we do to is around axillary that innovation. Engine three is really bringing everything together as one team. So we provide a better outcome to our customers. You know, in that simplification after that you talk about is court toe what we're driving. So I want to do less things, I guess better in the notion of how we do that. What that means to me is, as I make decisions that want to move away from other technologies and really leverage our best of breed type shared type, that's technology. I p people I p I can, you know, e can exceed customer needs in those markets that were serving. So it's actually allows me to x Sorry, my innovation engine, because I shift more and more resource is onto the newer stock now for Del Tech world. Yes, We got some cool stuff coming. You probably heard about a few of them. Uh, we're gonna be announcing a project project Apex. Hopefully you've been briefed on that already. This isn't new news or I'll be in trouble. But that's really around. Our strategy about delivering, simple, consistent as a service experiences for our customers bringing together are dealt technology as a service offering and our cloud strategy together. Onda also our technology offerings in our go to market all under a single unified effort, which Ellison do would be leading. Um, you know, on behalf of our executive leadership team s, that's one big area. And there is also another big one that I'll talk about a sui expand our as a service offers. And we think there's a big power to that in regards to our Dell Technologies. Cloud console solving will be launching a new cloud console that will provide uniformed experience across all the resources and give users and ability toe instantly managed every aspect of their cloud journey with just a few clicks. So going back to your broader point, it's all about simplicity. >>Yeah, we definitely all over Apex. That's something I wanted to ask you about this notion of as a service, really requiring it could have a new mindset, certainly from a pricing and how you talk about the customer experience that it's a whole new customer experience. Your you're basically giving them access. Thio What I would consider more of a platform on giving them some greater flexibility. Yeah, there's some constraints in there, but of course, you know the physical only put so much capacity and before him. But the idea of being ableto dial up, dial down within certain commitments is, I think, a powerful one. How does it change the way in which you you think about how you go about developing products just in terms of you know, this AP economy Infrastructure is code. How how you converse about those products internally and externally. How would you see that shaking >>out Dave? That's an awesome question. And it's actually for its front center. For everything we do, obviously, customers one choice and flexibility what they do. And to your point as we evolved warm or as a service, no specific product and product brands and logos on probably the way of the future. It's the services. It's the experience that you provide in regards to how we do that. So if you think about me, you know, in in infrastructure making infrastructure as a service, you really want to define what that customer experiences. That s L. A. That they're trying toe realize. And then how do we make sure that we build the right solutions? Products feature functions to enable that a law that goes back to the core engineering stuff that we need to dio right now, a lot of that stuff is about making sure that we have the right things around. If it's around developer community. If it's around AP rich, it's around. SdK is it's all about how do we leverage if it's internal source or external open source, if you will. It's regards to How do we do that? No. A thing that I think we all you know what you're well aware but we ought to keep in mind is that the cloud native applications are really relevant. Toe both the on premises, wealthy off premise. So think about things around portability reusability. You know, those are some great examples of just kind of how we think about this as we go forward. But those modern applications were required modern infrastructure, and regardless of how that infrastructure is abstracted now, just think about things like this. Aggregation or compose ability or Internet based computing. It's just it's a huge trend that we have to make sure we're thinking of. So is we. We just aggregate between the physical layers to the software layers and how we provide that to a service that could be think of a modern container based asset that could be repurposed. Either could be on a purpose built thing. It could be deployed in a converge or hyper converged. Or it could be two points a software feature in a cloud. Now, that's really how we're thinking about that, regards that we go forward. So we're talking about building modern assets or components That could be you right once we used many type model, and we can deploy that wherever you want because of some of the abstraction of desegregation that we're gonna do. >>E could see customers in the in the near term saying, I don't care so much about the product. I want the fast one all right with the cheaper one e. >>It's kind of what you talking about, that I talked about the ways. If you think about that regards, you know, maybe it's on a specific brand or portfolio. You look into and you say, Hey, what's the service level that I'd wanted to your point like Hey, for compute or for storage, it's really gonna end up being the specific S l A. And that's around performance or Leighton see, or cost or resiliency they want. They want that experience in that that you know, And that's why they're gonna be looking for the end of the end state. That's what we have to deliver is an engineering. >>So there's an opportunity here for you guys that I wonder if you could comment on. And that's the storage admin E. M. C essentially created. You know, you get this army of people that you know pretty good of provisioning lungs, although that's not really that's a great career path for folks. But program ability is, and this notion of infrastructure is code as you as you make your systems more programmable. Is there a skill set opportunity to take that army of constituents that you guys helped train and grow and over their careers and bring them along into sort of the next decade? This new era? >>I think the the easy answer is yes, I obviously that's a hard thing to do and you go forward. But I think embracing the change in the evolution of change, I think is a great opportunity. And I think there is e mean if you look step back and you think about data management, right? And you think about all the you know all data is not created equal and you know, and it has a life cycle, if you will. And so if it's on edge to Korda, Cloward, depending think about data vaults and data mobility and all that stuff. There's gonna be a bunch of different personas and people touching data along the way. I think the I T advance and the storage admin. They're just one of those personas that we have to help serve and way talk about How do we make them heroes, if you will, in regards to their broader environment. So if they're providing, if they evolve and really helped provide a modern infrastructure that really enables, you know infrastructure is a code or infrastructure as a service, they become a nightie hero, if you will for the rest of team. So I think there's a huge opportunity for them to evolve as the technology evolves. >>Yeah, you talked about you know, your families, your employees, your team s o. You obviously focused on them. You got your products going hitting all the marks. How are you spending your time these days? >>Thes days right now? Well, we're in. We're in our cycle for fiscal 22 planning. Right? And right now, a lot of that's above the specific markets were serving. It's gonna be about the strategy and making sure that we have people focused on those things. So it really comes back to some of the strategy tents were driving for next year. Now, as I said, our focus big time. Well, I guess for the for this year is one is consolidation of the core markets. Major focus for May 2 is going to be around winning in storage, and I want to be very specific. It's winning midrange storage. And that was one of the big reasons why Power Store came. That's gonna be a big focus on Bennett's really making sure that we're delivering on the as a service stuff that we just talked about in regards to all the technology innovation that's required to really provide the customer experience. And then, lastly, it's making sure that we take advantage of some of these growth factors. So you're going to see a dentist. Probably talked a lot about Telco, but telco on edge and as a service and cloud those things, they're just gonna be key to everything I do. So if you think about from poor infrastructure to some of these emerging opportunities Z, I'm spending all my time. >>Well, it's a It's a big business and a really important one for Fidel. Jeff Boudreau. Thanks so much for coming back in the Cube. Really a pleasure seeing you. I hope we can see each other face to face soon. >>You too. Thank you for having me. >>You're very welcome. And thank you for watching everybody keep it right there. This is Dave Volonte for the Cube. Our continuing coverage of Del Tech World 2020. We'll be right back right after this short break
SUMMARY :
World Digital experience Brought to you by Dell Technologies. the past 12 months that you you feel like sharing? especially starting in March on I've been really focused on the health and safety of our, you know, the families, But the flip side of that is you mentioned your portfolio refresh. So from power edge servers, you know, power Max, the high end storage, There's some of the things we talk about GPS and deep use and smart Knicks and things like that. These alternative processors really start to hit the market videos. I mean, we should, you know, with our partners, if it's Intel's and in videos and folks like and he was saying, Look, you know, fundamentally, we're executing on the same strategy. and some of the examples I'll give you right now that we're doing is if you think about innovating across icy, And that's that's what you got to deliver. You know, in that simplification after that you talk about is court toe what we're driving. How does it change the way in which you you think about how It's the experience that you provide in regards to how we do that. I don't care so much about the product. They want that experience in that that you know, So there's an opportunity here for you guys that I wonder if you could comment on. And you think about all the you know all data is not Yeah, you talked about you know, your families, your employees, So if you think about from poor infrastructure I hope we can see each other face to face soon. Thank you for having me. And thank you for watching everybody keep it right there.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Boudreau | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Clark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
May 2 | DATE | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
Deltek | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
85% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Rose | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Arrow Electronics SAA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
one team | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Power Store | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
nine weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Aziz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fiscal 22 | DATE | 0.99+ |
41 data | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Del Tech | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three key components | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Onda | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
next decade | DATE | 0.98+ |
two tier | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two points | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
June | DATE | 0.97+ |
about 90% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three tier | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Apex | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
one year | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Fidel | PERSON | 0.96+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Day one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Fortune 500 Global Elektronik | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
nine launches | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Dell Tech | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Project Monterey | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Service Storage Network | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Mauritz | PERSON | 0.93+ |
over five times | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Cloward | PERSON | 0.88+ |
Bennett | PERSON | 0.88+ |
Leighton | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
six key areas | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
over 90 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
past 12 months | DATE | 0.86+ |
Del Tech World 2020 | EVENT | 0.86+ |
Delta | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
second half | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
about | DATE | 0.82+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Aviatrix Altitude - Panel 1 - Industry Experts Panel
(electronic music) >> From Santa Clara, California in the heart of Silicon Valley, its theCUBE. Covering Altitude 2020, brought to you by Aviatrix. (electronic music) >> Female pilot: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking, we will soon be taking off on our way to altitude. (upbeat music) Please keep your seat belts fastened and remain in your seat. We will be experiencing turbulence, until we are above the clouds. (thunder blasting) (electronic music) (seatbelt alert sounds) Ladies and gentlemen, we are now cruising at altitude. Sit back and enjoy the ride. (electronic music) >> Female pilot: Altitude is a community of thought leaders and pioneers, cloud architects and enlightened network engineers, who have individually and are now collectively, leading their own IT teams and the industry. On a path to lift cloud networking above the clouds. Empowering enterprise IT to architect, design and control their own cloud network, regardless of the turbulent clouds beneath them. It's time to gain altitude. Ladies and gentlemen, Steve Mullaney, president and CEO of Aviatrix. The leader of multi-cloud networking. (electronic music) (audience clapping) >> Steve: All right. (audience clapping) Good morning everybody, here in Santa Clara as well as to the millions of people watching the livestream worldwide. Welcome to Altitude 2020, all right. So, we've got a fantastic event, today, I'm really excited about the speakers that we have today and the experts that we have and really excited to get started. So, one of the things I wanted to share was this is not a one-time event. This is not a one-time thing that we're going to do. Sorry for the Aviation analogy, but, you know, Sherry Wei, aviatrix means female pilot so everything we do has an aviation theme. This is a take-off, for a movement. This isn't an event, this is a take-off of a movement. A multi-cloud networking movement and community that we're inviting all of you to become part of. And why we're doing that, is we want to enable enterprises to rise above the clouds, so to speak and build their network architecture, regardless of which public cloud they're using. Whether it's one or more of these public clouds. So the good news, for today, there's lots of good news but this is one good news, is we don't have any PowerPoint presentations, no marketing speak. We know that marketing people have their own language. We're not using any of that, and no sales pitches, right? So instead, what are we doing? We're going to have expert panels, we've got Simon Richard, of Gartner here. We've got ten different network architects, cloud architects, real practitioners that are going to share their best practices and their real world experiences on their journey to the multi-cloud. So, before we start, everybody know what today is? In the U.S., it's Super Tuesday. I'm not going to get political, but Super Tuesday there was a bigger, Super Tuesday that happened 18 months ago. And Aviatrix employees know what I'm talking about. Eighteen months ago, on a Tuesday, every enterprise said, "I'm going to go to the cloud". And so what that was, was the Cambrian explosion, for cloud, for the enterprise. So, Frank Cabri, you know what a Cambrian explosion is. He had to look it up on Google. 500 million years ago, what happened, there was an explosion of life where it went from very simple single-cell organisms to very complex, multi-cell organisms. Guess what happened 18 months ago, on a Tuesday, I don't really know why, but every enterprise, like I said, all woke up that day and said, "Now I'm really going to go to cloud" and that Cambrian explosion of cloud meant that I'm moving from a very simple, single cloud, single-use case, simple environment, to a very complex, multi-cloud, complex use case environment. And what we're here today, is we're going to go undress that and how do you handle those, those complexities? And, when you look at what's happening, with customers right now, this is a business transformation, right? People like to talk about transitions, this is a transformation and it's actually not just a technology transformation, it's a business transformation. It started from the CEO and the Boards of enterprise customers where they said, "I have an existential threat to the survival of my company." If you look at every industry, who they're worried about is not the other 30-year-old enterprise. What they're worried about is the three year old enterprise that's leveraging cloud, that's leveraging AI, and that's where they fear that they're going to actually wiped out, right? And so, because of this existential threat, this is CEO led, this is Board led, this is not technology led, it is mandated in the organizations. We are going to digitally transform our enterprise, because of this existential threat and the movement to cloud is going to enable us to go do that. And so, IT is now put back in charge. If you think back just a few years ago, in cloud, it was led by DevOps, it was led by the applications and it was, like I said, before the Cambrian explosion, it was very simple. Now, with this Cambrian explosion, an enterprise is getting very serious and mission critical. They care about visibility, they care about control, they care about compliance, conformance, everything, governance. IT is in charge and that's why we're here today to discuss that. So, what we're going to do today, is much of things but we're going to validate this journey with customers. >> Steve: Did they see the same thing? We're going to validate the requirements for multi-cloud because, honestly, I've never met an enterprise that is not going to be multicloud. Many are one cloud today but they all say, " I need to architect my network for multiple clouds", because that's just what, the network is there to support the applications and the applications will run in whatever cloud it runs best in and you have to be prepared for that. The second thing is, is architecture. Again, with IT in charge, you, architecture matters. Whether its your career, whether its how you build your house, it doesn't matter. Horrible architecture, your life is horrible forever. Good architecture, your life is pretty good. So, we're going to talk about architecture and how the most fundamental and critical part of that architecture and that basic infrastructure is the network. If you don't get that right, nothing works, right? Way more important than compute. Way more important than storage. Network is the foundational element of your infrastructure. Then we're going to talk about day two operations. What does that mean? Well day one is one day of your life, where you wire things up they do and beyond. I tell everyone in networking and IT -- it's every day of your life. And if you don't get that right, your life is bad forever. And so things like operations, visibility, security, things like that, how do I get my operations team to be able to handle this in an automated way because it's not just about configuring it in the cloud, it's actually about how do I operationalize it? And that's a huge benefit that we bring as Aviatrix. And then the last thing we're going to talk and it's the last panel we have, I always sayyou can't forget about the humans, right? So all this technology, all these things that we're doing, it's always enabled by the humans. At the end of the day, if the humans fight it, it won't get deployed. And we have a massive skills gap, in cloud and we also have a massive skills shortage. You have everyone in the world trying to hire cloud network architects, right? There's just not enough of them going around. So, at Aviatrix, we said as leaders do, "We're going to help address that issue and try to create more people." We created a program, what we call the ACE Program, again, aviation theme, it stands for Aviatrix Certified Engineer. Very similar to what Cisco did with CCIEs where Cisco taught you about IP networking, a little bit of Cisco, we're doing the same thing, we're going to teach network architects about multicloud networking and architecture and yeah, you'll get a little bit of Aviatrix training in there, but this is the missing element for people's careers and also within their organizations. So we're going to go talk about that. So, great, great event, great show. We're going to try to keep it moving. I next want to introduce, my host, he is the best in the business, you guys have probably seen him multiple, many times, he is the co-CEO and co founder of theCUBE, John Furrier. (audience clapping) (electronic music) >> John: Okay, awesome, great speech there, awesome. >> Yeah. >> I totally agree with everything you said about the explosion happening and I'm excited, here at the heart of silicon valley to have this event. It's a special digital event with theCUBE and Aviatrix, where we're live-streaming to, millions of people, as you said, maybe not a million. >> Maybe not a million. (laughs) Really to take this program to the world and this is really special for me, because multi-cloud is the hottest wave in cloud. And cloud-native networking is fast becoming the key engine, of the innovations, so we got an hour and a half of action-packed programming. We have a customer panel. Two customer panels. Before that Gartner's going to come out, talk about the industry. We have global system integrators, that will talk about, how their advising and building these networks and cloud native networking. And then finally the ACE's, the Aviatrix Certified Engineers, are going to talk more about their certifications and the expertise needed. So, let's jump right in, let's ask, Simon Richard to come on stage, from Gartner. We'll kick it all off. (electronic music) (clapping) >> John: Hi, can I help you. Okay, so kicking things off, getting started. Gartner, the industry experts on cloud. Really kind of more, cue your background. Talk about your background before you got to Gartner? >> Simon: Before being at Gartner, I was a chief network architect, of a Fortune 500 company, that with thousands of sites over the world and I've been doing everything in IT from a C programmer, in the 90, to a security architect, to a network engineer, to finally becoming a network analyst. >> So you rode the wave. Now you're covering the marketplace with hybrid cloud and now moving quickly to multi-cloud, is really what everyone is talking about. >> Yes. >> Cloud-native's been discussed, but the networking piece is super important. How do you see that evolving? >> Well, the way we see Enterprise adapting, cloud. The first thing you do about networking, the initial phases they either go in a very ad hoc way. Is usually led by none IT, like a shadow IT, or application people, sometime a DevOps team and it just goes as, it's completely unplanned. They create VPC's left and right with different account and they create mesh to manage them and they have Direct Connect or Express Route to any of them. So that's the first approach and on the other side. again within our first approach you see what I call, the lift and shift. Where we see like enterprise IT trying to, basically replicate what they have in a data center, in the Cloud. So they spend a lot of time planning, doing Direct Connect, putting Cisco routers and F5 and Citrix and any checkpoint, Palo Alto device, that in a sense are removing that to the cloud. >> I got to ask you, the aha moment is going to come up a lot, in one our panels, is where people realize, that it's a multi-cloud world. I mean, they either inherit clouds, certainly they're using public cloud and on-premises is now more relevant than ever. When's that aha moment? That you're seeing, where people go, "Well I got to get my act together and get on this cloud." >> Well the first, right, even before multi-cloud. So there is two approach's. The first one, like the adult way doesn't scare. At some point IT has to save them, 'cause they don't think about the tools, they don't think about operation, they have a bunch of VPC and multiple cloud. The other way, if you do the lift and shift way, they cannot take any advantages of the cloud. They lose elasticity, auto-scaling, pay by the drink. All these agility features. So they both realize, okay, neither of these ways are good, so I have to optimize that. So I have to have a mix of what I call, the cloud native services, within each cloud. So they start adapting, like all the AWS Construct, Azure Construct or Google Construct and that's what I call the optimal phase. But even that they realize, after that, they are all very different, all these approaches different, the cloud are different. Identities is constantly, difficult to manage across clouds. I mean, for example, anybody who access' accounts, there's subscription, in Azure and GCP, their projects. It's a real mess, so they realized, well I don't really like constantly use the cloud product and every cloud, that doesn't work. So I have, I'm going multi-cloud, I like to abstract all of that. I still want to manage the cloud from an EPI point of view, I don't necessarily want to bring my incumbent data center products, but I have to do that and in a more EPI driven cloud environment. >> So, the not scaling piece that you where mentioning, that's because there's too many different clouds? >> Yes. >> That's the least they are, so what are they doing? What are they, building different development teams? Is it software? What's the solution? >> Well, the solution is to start architecting the cloud. That's the third phase. I called that the multi-cloud architect phase, where they have to think about abstraction that works across cloud. Fact, even across one cloud it might not scale as well, If you start having like ten thousand security agreement, anybody who has that doesn't scale. You have to manage that. If you have multiple VPC, it doesn't scale. You need a third-party, identity provider. In variously scales within one cloud, if you go multiple cloud, it gets worse and worse. >> Steve, weigh in here. What's your thoughts? >> I thought we said this wasn't going to be a sales pitch for Aviatrix. (laughter) You just said exactly what we do, so anyway, that's a joke. What do you see in terms of where people are, in that multi-cloud? So, like lot of people, you know, everyone I talk to, started at one cloud, right, but then they look and then say okay but I'm now going to move to Azure and I'm going to move to... (trails off) Do you see a similar thing? >> Well, yes. They are moving but there's not a lot of application, that uses three cloud at once, they move one app in Azure, one app in AWS and one app in Google. That's what we see so far. >> Okay, yeah, one of the mistakes that people think, is they think multi-cloud. No one is ever going to go multi-cloud, for arbitrage. They're not going to go and say, well, today I might go into Azure, 'cause I get a better rate on my instance. Do you agree? That's never going to happen. What I've seen with enterprise, is I'm going to put the workload in the app, the app decides where it runs best. That may be Azure, maybe Google and for different reasons and they're going to stick there and they're not going to move. >> Let me ask you guys-- >> But the infrastructure, has to be able to support, from a networking team. >> Yes. >> Be able to do that. Do you agree with that? >> Yes, I agree. And one thing is also very important, is connecting to the cloud, is kind of the easiest thing. So, the wide area network part of the cloud, connectivity to the cloud is kind of simple. >> Steve: I agree. >> IP's like VPN, Direct Connect, Express Route. That's the simple part, what's difficult and even the provisioning part is easy. You can use Terraform and create VPC's and Vnet's across your three cloud provider. >> Steve: Right. >> What's difficult is that they choose the operation. So we'll define day two operation. What does that actually mean? >> Its just the day to day operations, after you know, the natural, lets add an app, lets add a server, lets troubleshoot a problem. >> Something changes, now what do you do? >> So what's the big concerns? I want to just get back to the cloud native networking, because everyone kind of knows what cloud native apps are. That's been the hot trend. What is cloud native networking? How do you guys, define that? Because that seems to be the hardest part of the multi-cloud wave that's coming, is cloud native networking. >> Well there's no, you know, official Gartner definition but I can create one on the spot. >> John: Do it. (laughter) >> I just want to leverage the Cloud Construct and the cloud EPI. I don't want to have to install, like a... (trails off) For example, the first version was, let's put a virtual router that doesn't even understand the cloud environment. >> Right. If I have if I have to install a virtual machine, it has to be cloud aware. It has to understand the security group, if it's a router. It has to be programmable, to the cloud API. And understand the cloud environment. >> And one thing I hear a lot from either CSO's, CIO's or CXO's in general, is this idea of, I'm definitely not going API. So, its been an API economy. So API is key on that point, but then they say. Okay, I need to essentially have the right relationship with my suppliers, aka you called it above the clouds. So the question is... What do I do from an architectural standpoint? Do I just hire more developers and have different teams, because you mentioned that's a scale point. How do you solve this problem of, okay, I got AWS, I got GCP, or Azure, or whatever. Do I just have different teams or do I just expose EPI's? Where is that optimization? Where's the focus? >> Well, I think what you need, from a network point of view is a way, a control plane across the three clouds. And be able to use the API's of the cloud, to build networks but also to troubleshoot them and do day to day operation. So you need a view across the three clouds, that takes care of routing, connectivity. >> Steve: Performance. >> John: That's the Aviatrix plugin, right there. >> Steve: Yeah. So, how do you see, so again, your Gartner, you see the industry. You've been a network architect. How do you see this this playing out? What are the legacy incumbent client server, On Prem networking people, going to do? >> Well they need to.. >> Versus people like a Aviatrix? How do you see that playing out? >> Well obviously, all the incumbents, like Arista, Cisco, Juniper, NSX. >> Steve: Right. >> They want to basically do the lift and shift part, they want to bring, and you know, VMware want to bring in NSX on the cloud, they call that "NSX everywhere" and Cisco want to bring in ACI to the cloud, they call that "ACI Anywhere". So, everyone's.. (trails off) And then there's CloudVision from Arista, and Contrail is in the cloud. So, they just want to bring the management plane, in the cloud, but it's still based, most of them, is still based on putting a VM in them and controlling them. You extend your management console to the cloud, that's not truly cloud native. >> Right. >> Cloud native you almost have to build it from scratch. >> We like to call that cloud naive. >> Cloud naive, yeah. >> So close, one letter, right? >> Yes. >> That was a big.. (slurs) Reinvent, take the T out of Cloud Native. It's Cloud Naive. (laughter) >> That went super viral, you guys got T-shirts now. I know you're loving that. >> Steve: Yeah. >> But that really, ultimately, is kind of a double-edged sword. You can be naive on the architecture side and ruleing that. And also suppliers or can be naive. So how would you define who's naive and who's not? >> Well, in fact, their evolving as well, so for example, in Cisco, it's a little bit more native than other ones, because there really is, "ACI in the cloud", you can't really figure API's out of the cloud. NSX is going that way and so is Arista, but they're incumbent, they have their own tools, its difficult for them. They're moving slowly, so it's much easier to start from scratch. Even you, like, you know, a network company that started a few years ago. There's only really two, Aviatrix was the first one, they've been there for at least three or four years. >> Steve: Yeah. >> And there's other one's, like Akira, for example that just started. Now they're doing more connectivity, but they want to create an overlay network, across the cloud and start doing policies and things. Abstracting all the clouds within one platform. >> So, I got to ask you. I interviewed an executive at VMware, Sanjay Poonen, he said to me at RSA last week. Oh, there'll only be two networking vendors left, Cisco and VMware. (laughter) >> What's you're response to that? Obviously when you have these waves, these new brands that emerge, like Aviatrix and others. I think there'll be a lot of startups coming out of the woodwork. How do you respond to that comment? >> Well there's still a data center, there's still, like a lot, of action on campus and there's the wan. But from the cloud provisioning and cloud networking in general, I mean, they're behind I think. You know, you don't even need them to start with, you can, if you're small enough, you can just keep.. If you have AWS, you can use the AWS construct, they have to insert themselves, I mean, they're running behind. From my point of view. >> They are, certainly incumbents. I love the term Andy Jess uses at Amazon web services. He uses "Old guard, new guard", to talk about the industry. What does the new guard have to do? The new brands that are emerging. Is it be more DevOp's oriented? Is it NetSec ops? Is it NetOps? Is it programmability? These are some of the key discussions we've been having. What's your view, on how you see this programmability? >> The most important part is, they have to make the network simple for the Dev teams. You cannot make a phone call and get a Vline in two weeks anymore. So if you move to the cloud, you have to make that cloud construct as simple enough, so that for example, a Dev team could say, "Okay, I'm going to create this VPC, but this VPC automatically associates your account, you cannot go out on the internet. You have to go to the transit VPC, so there's lot of action in terms of, the IAM part and you have to put the control around them to. So to make it as simple as possible. >> You guys, both. You're the CEO of Aviatrix, but also you've got a lot of experience, going back to networking, going back to the, I call it the OSI days. For us old folks know what that means, but, you guys know what this means. I want to ask you the question. As you look at the future of networking, you hear a couple objections. "Oh, the cloud guys, they got networking, we're all set with them. How do you respond to the fact that networking's changing and the cloud guys have their own networking. What's some of the paying points that's going on premises of these enterprises? So are they good with the clouds? What needs... What are the key things that's going on in networking, that makes it more than just the cloud networking? What's your take on it? >> Well as I said earlier. Once you could easily provision in the cloud, you can easily connect to the cloud, its when you start troubleshooting applications in the cloud and try to scale. So that's where the problem occurred. >> Okay, what's your take on it. >> And you'll hear from the customers, that we have on stage and I think what happens is all the clouds by definition, designed to the 80-20 rule which means they'll design 80% of the basic functionality. And then lead to 20% extra functionality, that of course every Enterprise needs, to leave that to ISV's, like Aviatrix. Because why? Because they have to make money, they have a service and they can't have huge instances, for functionality that not everybody needs. So they have to design to the common and that, they all do it, right? They have to and then the extra, the problem is, that Cambrian explosion, that I talked about with enterprises. That's what they need. They're the ones who need that extra 20%. So that's what I see, there's always going to be that extra functionality. In an automated and simple way, that you talked about, but yet powerful. With the up with the visibility and control, that they expect of On Prem. That kind of combination, that Yin and the Yang, that people like us are providing. >> Simon I want to ask you? We're going to ask some of the cloud architect, customer panels, that same question. There's pioneer's doing some work here and there's also the laggards who come in behind their early adopters. What's going to be the tipping point? What are some of these conversations, that the cloud architects are having out there? Or what's the signs, that they need to be on this, multi-cloud or cloud native networking trend? What are some of the signal's that are going on in the environment? What are some of the thresholds? Are things that are going on, that they can pay attention to? >> Well, once they have the application on multiple cloud and they have to get wake up at two in the morning, to troubleshoot them. They'll know it's important. (laughter) So, I think that's when the rubber will hit the road. But, as I said, it's easier to prove, at any case. Okay, it's AWS, it's easy, user transit gateway, put a few VPC's and you're done. And you create some presents like Equinox and do a Direct Connect and Express Route with Azure. That looks simple, its the operations, that's when they'll realize. Okay, now I need to understand! How cloud networking works? I also need a tool, that gives me visibility and control. But not only that, I need to understand the basic underneath it as well. >> What are some of the day in the life scenarios. you envision happening with multi-cloud, because you think about what's happening. It kind of has that same vibe of interoperability, choice, multi-vendor, 'cause they're multi-cloud. Essentially multi-vendor. These are kind of old paradigms, that we've lived through with client server and internet working. What are some of the scenarios of success, that might be possible? Will be possible, with multi-cloud and cloud native networking. >> Well, I think, once you have good enough visibility, to satisfy your customers, not only, like to, keep the service running and application running. But to be able to provision fast enough, I think that's what you want to achieve. >> Simon, final question. Advice for folks watching on the Livestream, if they're sitting there as a cloud architect or CXO. What's your advice to them right now, in this market, 'cause obviously, public cloud check, hybrid cloud, they're working on that. That gets on premises done, now multi-cloud's right behind it. What's your advice? >> The first thing they should do, is really try to understand cloud networking. For each of their cloud providers and then understand the limitations. And, is what the cloud service provider offers enough? Or you need to look to a third party, but you don't look at a third party to start with. Especially an incumbent one, so it's tempting to say "I have a bunch of F5 experts", nothing against F5. I'm going to bring my F5 in the Cloud, when you can use an ELB, that automatically understand eases and auto scaling and so on. And you understand that's much simpler, but sometimes you need your F5, because you have requirements. You have like iRules and that kind of stuff, that you've used for years. 'cause you cannot do it. Okay, I have requirement and that's not met, I'm going to use Legacy Star and then you have to start thinking, okay, what about visibility control, above the true cloud. But before you do that you have to understand the limitations of the existing cloud providers. First, try to be as native as possible, until things don't work, after that you can start thinking of the cloud. >> Great insight, Simon. Thank you. >> That's great. >> With Gartner, thank you for sharing. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
Covering Altitude 2020, brought to you by Aviatrix. Sit back and enjoy the ride. and the industry. and the movement to cloud is going to enable us and that basic infrastructure is the network. I totally agree with everything you said about and the expertise needed. Gartner, the industry experts on cloud. in the 90, to a security architect, to a network engineer, and now moving quickly to multi-cloud, but the networking piece is super important. and they create mesh to manage them I got to ask you, the aha moment is going to come up a lot, So I have to have a mix of what I call, Well, the solution is to start architecting the cloud. What's your thoughts? and then say okay but I'm now going to move to Azure that uses three cloud at once, they move one app in Azure, and for different reasons and they're going to stick there But the infrastructure, has to be able to support, Be able to do that. is connecting to the cloud, is kind of the easiest thing. and even the provisioning part is easy. What's difficult is that they choose the operation. Its just the day to day operations, after you know, Because that seems to be the hardest part of the but I can create one on the spot. (laughter) and the cloud EPI. It has to be programmable, to the cloud API. Okay, I need to essentially have the right relationship with and do day to day operation. What are the legacy incumbent client server, Well obviously, all the incumbents, like Arista, and Contrail is in the cloud. Reinvent, take the T out of Cloud Native. That went super viral, you guys got T-shirts now. You can be naive on the architecture side and ruleing that. They're moving slowly, so it's much easier to start across the cloud and start doing policies and things. So, I got to ask you. How do you respond to that comment? they have to insert themselves, I mean, What does the new guard have to do? they have to make the network simple for the Dev teams. and the cloud guys have their own networking. you can easily connect to the cloud, So they have to design to the common and that, that the cloud architects are having out there? and they have to get wake up at two in the morning, What are some of the day in the life scenarios. I think that's what you want to achieve. What's your advice to them right now, in this market, and then you have to start thinking, okay, Thank you. With Gartner, thank you for sharing.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aviatrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Frank Cabri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjay Poonen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Simon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jess | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sherry Wei | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NSX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Simon Richard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Juniper | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Arista | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Akira | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Eighteen months ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
one-time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
one platform | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
18 months ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first approach | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one app | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ten thousand | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first version | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Aviatrix Altitude 2020, Full Event | Santa Clara, CA
(electronic music) >> From Santa Clara, California in the heart of Silicon Valley, its theCUBE. Covering Altitude 2020, brought to you by Aviatrix. (electronic music) >> Female pilot: Good morning, ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking, we will soon be taking off on our way to altitude. (upbeat music) Please keep your seat belts fastened and remain in your seat. We will be experiencing turbulence, until we are above the clouds. (thunder blasting) (electronic music) (seatbelt alert sounds) Ladies and gentlemen, we are now cruising at altitude. Sit back and enjoy the ride. (electronic music) >> Female pilot: Altitude is a community of thought leaders and pioneers, cloud architects and enlightened network engineers, who have individually and are now collectively, leading their own IT teams and the industry. On a path to lift cloud networking above the clouds. Empowering enterprise IT to architect, design and control their own cloud network, regardless of the turbulent clouds beneath them. It's time to gain altitude. Ladies and gentlemen, Steve Mullaney, president and CEO of Aviatrix. The leader of multi-cloud networking. (electronic music) (audience clapping) >> Steve: All right. (audience clapping) Good morning everybody, here in Santa Clara as well as to the millions of people watching the livestream worldwide. Welcome to Altitude 2020, all right. So, we've got a fantastic event, today, I'm really excited about the speakers that we have today and the experts that we have and really excited to get started. So, one of the things I wanted to share was this is not a one-time event. This is not a one-time thing that we're going to do. Sorry for the Aviation analogy, but, you know, Sherry Wei, aviatrix means female pilot so everything we do has an aviation theme. This is a take-off, for a movement. This isn't an event, this is a take-off of a movement. A multi-cloud networking movement and community that we're inviting all of you to become part of. And why we're doing that, is we want to enable enterprises to rise above the clouds, so to speak and build their network architecture, regardless of which public cloud they're using. Whether it's one or more of these public clouds. So the good news, for today, there's lots of good news but this is one good news, is we don't have any PowerPoint presentations, no marketing speak. We know that marketing people have their own language. We're not using any of that, and no sales pitches, right? So instead, what are we doing? We're going to have expert panels, we've got Simon Richard, of Gartner here. We've got ten different network architects, cloud architects, real practitioners that are going to share their best practices and their real world experiences on their journey to the multi-cloud. So, before we start, everybody know what today is? In the U.S., it's Super Tuesday. I'm not going to get political, but Super Tuesday there was a bigger, Super Tuesday that happened 18 months ago. And Aviatrix employees know what I'm talking about. Eighteen months ago, on a Tuesday, every enterprise said, "I'm going to go to the cloud". And so what that was, was the Cambrian explosion, for cloud, for the enterprise. So, Frank Cabri, you know what a Cambrian explosion is. He had to look it up on Google. 500 million years ago, what happened, there was an explosion of life where it went from very simple single-cell organisms to very complex, multi-cell organisms. Guess what happened 18 months ago, on a Tuesday, I don't really know why, but every enterprise, like I said, all woke up that day and said, "Now I'm really going to go to cloud" and that Cambrian explosion of cloud meant that I'm moving from a very simple, single cloud, single-use case, simple environment, to a very complex, multi-cloud, complex use case environment. And what we're here today, is we're going to go undress that and how do you handle those, those complexities? And, when you look at what's happening, with customers right now, this is a business transformation, right? People like to talk about transitions, this is a transformation and it's actually not just a technology transformation, it's a business transformation. It started from the CEO and the Boards of enterprise customers where they said, "I have an existential threat to the survival of my company." If you look at every industry, who they're worried about is not the other 30-year-old enterprise. What they're worried about is the three year old enterprise that's leveraging cloud, that's leveraging AI, and that's where they fear that they're going to actually wiped out, right? And so, because of this existential threat, this is CEO led, this is Board led, this is not technology led, it is mandated in the organizations. We are going to digitally transform our enterprise, because of this existential threat and the movement to cloud is going to enable us to go do that. And so, IT is now put back in charge. If you think back just a few years ago, in cloud, it was led by DevOps, it was led by the applications and it was, like I said, before the Cambrian explosion, it was very simple. Now, with this Cambrian explosion, an enterprise is getting very serious and mission critical. They care about visibility, they care about control, they care about compliance, conformance, everything, governance. IT is in charge and that's why we're here today to discuss that. So, what we're going to do today, is much of things but we're going to validate this journey with customers. >> Steve: Did they see the same thing? We're going to validate the requirements for multi-cloud because, honestly, I've never met an enterprise that is not going to be multicloud. Many are one cloud today but they all say, " I need to architect my network for multiple clouds", because that's just what, the network is there to support the applications and the applications will run in whatever cloud it runs best in and you have to be prepared for that. The second thing is, is architecture. Again, with IT in charge, you, architecture matters. Whether its your career, whether its how you build your house, it doesn't matter. Horrible architecture, your life is horrible forever. Good architecture, your life is pretty good. So, we're going to talk about architecture and how the most fundamental and critical part of that architecture and that basic infrastructure is the network. If you don't get that right, nothing works, right? Way more important than compute. Way more important than storage. Network is the foundational element of your infrastructure. Then we're going to talk about day two operations. What does that mean? Well day one is one day of your life, where you wire things up they do and beyond. I tell everyone in networking and IT -- it's every day of your life. And if you don't get that right, your life is bad forever. And so things like operations, visibility, security, things like that, how do I get my operations team to be able to handle this in an automated way because it's not just about configuring it in the cloud, it's actually about how do I operationalize it? And that's a huge benefit that we bring as Aviatrix. And then the last thing we're going to talk and it's the last panel we have, I always sayyou can't forget about the humans, right? So all this technology, all these things that we're doing, it's always enabled by the humans. At the end of the day, if the humans fight it, it won't get deployed. And we have a massive skills gap, in cloud and we also have a massive skills shortage. You have everyone in the world trying to hire cloud network architects, right? There's just not enough of them going around. So, at Aviatrix, we said as leaders do, "We're going to help address that issue and try to create more people." We created a program, what we call the ACE Program, again, aviation theme, it stands for Aviatrix Certified Engineer. Very similar to what Cisco did with CCIEs where Cisco taught you about IP networking, a little bit of Cisco, we're doing the same thing, we're going to teach network architects about multicloud networking and architecture and yeah, you'll get a little bit of Aviatrix training in there, but this is the missing element for people's careers and also within their organizations. So we're going to go talk about that. So, great, great event, great show. We're going to try to keep it moving. I next want to introduce, my host, he is the best in the business, you guys have probably seen him multiple, many times, he is the co-CEO and co founder of theCUBE, John Furrier. (audience clapping) (electronic music) >> John: Okay, awesome, great speech there, awesome. >> Yeah. >> I totally agree with everything you said about the explosion happening and I'm excited, here at the heart of silicon valley to have this event. It's a special digital event with theCUBE and Aviatrix, where we're live-streaming to, millions of people, as you said, maybe not a million. >> Maybe not a million. (laughs) Really to take this program to the world and this is really special for me, because multi-cloud is the hottest wave in cloud. And cloud-native networking is fast becoming the key engine, of the innovations, so we got an hour and a half of action-packed programming. We have a customer panel. Two customer panels. Before that Gartner's going to come out, talk about the industry. We have global system integrators, that will talk about, how their advising and building these networks and cloud native networking. And then finally the ACE's, the Aviatrix Certified Engineers, are going to talk more about their certifications and the expertise needed. So, let's jump right in, let's ask, Simon Richard to come on stage, from Gartner. We'll kick it all off. (electronic music) (clapping) >> John: Hi, can I help you. Okay, so kicking things off, getting started. Gartner, the industry experts on cloud. Really kind of more, cue your background. Talk about your background before you got to Gartner? >> Simon: Before being at Gartner, I was a chief network architect, of a Fortune 500 company, that with thousands of sites over the world and I've been doing everything in IT from a C programmer, in the 90, to a security architect, to a network engineer, to finally becoming a network analyst. >> So you rode the wave. Now you're covering the marketplace with hybrid cloud and now moving quickly to multi-cloud, is really what everyone is talking about. >> Yes. >> Cloud-native's been discussed, but the networking piece is super important. How do you see that evolving? >> Well, the way we see Enterprise adapting, cloud. The first thing you do about networking, the initial phases they either go in a very ad hoc way. Is usually led by none IT, like a shadow IT, or application people, sometime a DevOps team and it just goes as, it's completely unplanned. They create VPC's left and right with different account and they create mesh to manage them and they have Direct Connect or Express Route to any of them. So that's the first approach and on the other side. again within our first approach you see what I call, the lift and shift. Where we see like enterprise IT trying to, basically replicate what they have in a data center, in the Cloud. So they spend a lot of time planning, doing Direct Connect, putting Cisco routers and F5 and Citrix and any checkpoint, Palo Alto device, that in a sense are removing that to the cloud. >> I got to ask you, the aha moment is going to come up a lot, in one our panels, is where people realize, that it's a multi-cloud world. I mean, they either inherit clouds, certainly they're using public cloud and on-premises is now more relevant than ever. When's that aha moment? That you're seeing, where people go, "Well I got to get my act together and get on this cloud." >> Well the first, right, even before multi-cloud. So there is two approach's. The first one, like the adult way doesn't scare. At some point IT has to save them, 'cause they don't think about the tools, they don't think about operation, they have a bunch of VPC and multiple cloud. The other way, if you do the lift and shift way, they cannot take any advantages of the cloud. They lose elasticity, auto-scaling, pay by the drink. All these agility features. So they both realize, okay, neither of these ways are good, so I have to optimize that. So I have to have a mix of what I call, the cloud native services, within each cloud. So they start adapting, like all the AWS Construct, Azure Construct or Google Construct and that's what I call the optimal phase. But even that they realize, after that, they are all very different, all these approaches different, the cloud are different. Identities is constantly, difficult to manage across clouds. I mean, for example, anybody who access' accounts, there's subscription, in Azure and GCP, their projects. It's a real mess, so they realized, well I don't really like constantly use the cloud product and every cloud, that doesn't work. So I have, I'm going multi-cloud, I like to abstract all of that. I still want to manage the cloud from an EPI point of view, I don't necessarily want to bring my incumbent data center products, but I have to do that and in a more EPI driven cloud environment. >> So, the not scaling piece that you where mentioning, that's because there's too many different clouds? >> Yes. >> That's the least they are, so what are they doing? What are they, building different development teams? Is it software? What's the solution? >> Well, the solution is to start architecting the cloud. That's the third phase. I called that the multi-cloud architect phase, where they have to think about abstraction that works across cloud. Fact, even across one cloud it might not scale as well, If you start having like ten thousand security agreement, anybody who has that doesn't scale. You have to manage that. If you have multiple VPC, it doesn't scale. You need a third-party, identity provider. In variously scales within one cloud, if you go multiple cloud, it gets worse and worse. >> Steve, weigh in here. What's your thoughts? >> I thought we said this wasn't going to be a sales pitch for Aviatrix. (laughter) You just said exactly what we do, so anyway, that's a joke. What do you see in terms of where people are, in that multi-cloud? So, like lot of people, you know, everyone I talk to, started at one cloud, right, but then they look and then say okay but I'm now going to move to Azure and I'm going to move to... (trails off) Do you see a similar thing? >> Well, yes. They are moving but there's not a lot of application, that uses three cloud at once, they move one app in Azure, one app in AWS and one app in Google. That's what we see so far. >> Okay, yeah, one of the mistakes that people think, is they think multi-cloud. No one is ever going to go multi-cloud, for arbitrage. They're not going to go and say, well, today I might go into Azure, 'cause I get a better rate on my instance. Do you agree? That's never going to happen. What I've seen with enterprise, is I'm going to put the workload in the app, the app decides where it runs best. That may be Azure, maybe Google and for different reasons and they're going to stick there and they're not going to move. >> Let me ask you guys-- >> But the infrastructure, has to be able to support, from a networking team. >> Yes. >> Be able to do that. Do you agree with that? >> Yes, I agree. And one thing is also very important, is connecting to the cloud, is kind of the easiest thing. So, the wide area network part of the cloud, connectivity to the cloud is kind of simple. >> Steve: I agree. >> IP's like VPN, Direct Connect, Express Route. That's the simple part, what's difficult and even the provisioning part is easy. You can use Terraform and create VPC's and Vnet's across your three cloud provider. >> Steve: Right. >> What's difficult is that they choose the operation. So we'll define day two operation. What does that actually mean? >> Its just the day to day operations, after you know, the natural, lets add an app, lets add a server, lets troubleshoot a problem. >> Something changes, now what do you do? >> So what's the big concerns? I want to just get back to the cloud native networking, because everyone kind of knows what cloud native apps are. That's been the hot trend. What is cloud native networking? How do you guys, define that? Because that seems to be the hardest part of the multi-cloud wave that's coming, is cloud native networking. >> Well there's no, you know, official Gartner definition but I can create one on the spot. >> John: Do it. (laughter) >> I just want to leverage the Cloud Construct and the cloud EPI. I don't want to have to install, like a... (trails off) For example, the first version was, let's put a virtual router that doesn't even understand the cloud environment. >> Right. If I have if I have to install a virtual machine, it has to be cloud aware. It has to understand the security group, if it's a router. It has to be programmable, to the cloud API. And understand the cloud environment. >> And one thing I hear a lot from either CSO's, CIO's or CXO's in general, is this idea of, I'm definitely not going API. So, its been an API economy. So API is key on that point, but then they say. Okay, I need to essentially have the right relationship with my suppliers, aka you called it above the clouds. So the question is... What do I do from an architectural standpoint? Do I just hire more developers and have different teams, because you mentioned that's a scale point. How do you solve this problem of, okay, I got AWS, I got GCP, or Azure, or whatever. Do I just have different teams or do I just expose EPI's? Where is that optimization? Where's the focus? >> Well, I think what you need, from a network point of view is a way, a control plane across the three clouds. And be able to use the API's of the cloud, to build networks but also to troubleshoot them and do day to day operation. So you need a view across the three clouds, that takes care of routing, connectivity. >> Steve: Performance. >> John: That's the Aviatrix plugin, right there. >> Steve: Yeah. So, how do you see, so again, your Gartner, you see the industry. You've been a network architect. How do you see this this playing out? What are the legacy incumbent client server, On Prem networking people, going to do? >> Well they need to.. >> Versus people like a Aviatrix? How do you see that playing out? >> Well obviously, all the incumbents, like Arista, Cisco, Juniper, NSX. >> Steve: Right. >> They want to basically do the lift and shift part, they want to bring, and you know, VMware want to bring in NSX on the cloud, they call that "NSX everywhere" and Cisco want to bring in ACI to the cloud, they call that "ACI Anywhere". So, everyone's.. (trails off) And then there's CloudVision from Arista, and Contrail is in the cloud. So, they just want to bring the management plane, in the cloud, but it's still based, most of them, is still based on putting a VM in them and controlling them. You extend your management console to the cloud, that's not truly cloud native. >> Right. >> Cloud native you almost have to build it from scratch. >> We like to call that cloud naive. >> Cloud naive, yeah. >> So close, one letter, right? >> Yes. >> That was a big.. (slurs) Reinvent, take the T out of Cloud Native. It's Cloud Naive. (laughter) >> That went super viral, you guys got T-shirts now. I know you're loving that. >> Steve: Yeah. >> But that really, ultimately, is kind of a double-edged sword. You can be naive on the architecture side and ruleing that. And also suppliers or can be naive. So how would you define who's naive and who's not? >> Well, in fact, their evolving as well, so for example, in Cisco, it's a little bit more native than other ones, because there really is, "ACI in the cloud", you can't really figure API's out of the cloud. NSX is going that way and so is Arista, but they're incumbent, they have their own tools, its difficult for them. They're moving slowly, so it's much easier to start from scratch. Even you, like, you know, a network company that started a few years ago. There's only really two, Aviatrix was the first one, they've been there for at least three or four years. >> Steve: Yeah. >> And there's other one's, like Akira, for example that just started. Now they're doing more connectivity, but they want to create an overlay network, across the cloud and start doing policies and things. Abstracting all the clouds within one platform. >> So, I got to ask you. I interviewed an executive at VMware, Sanjay Poonen, he said to me at RSA last week. Oh, there'll only be two networking vendors left, Cisco and VMware. (laughter) >> What's you're response to that? Obviously when you have these waves, these new brands that emerge, like Aviatrix and others. I think there'll be a lot of startups coming out of the woodwork. How do you respond to that comment? >> Well there's still a data center, there's still, like a lot, of action on campus and there's the wan. But from the cloud provisioning and cloud networking in general, I mean, they're behind I think. You know, you don't even need them to start with, you can, if you're small enough, you can just keep.. If you have AWS, you can use the AWS construct, they have to insert themselves, I mean, they're running behind. From my point of view. >> They are, certainly incumbents. I love the term Andy Jess uses at Amazon web services. He uses "Old guard, new guard", to talk about the industry. What does the new guard have to do? The new brands that are emerging. Is it be more DevOp's oriented? Is it NetSec ops? Is it NetOps? Is it programmability? These are some of the key discussions we've been having. What's your view, on how you see this programmability? >> The most important part is, they have to make the network simple for the Dev teams. You cannot make a phone call and get a Vline in two weeks anymore. So if you move to the cloud, you have to make that cloud construct as simple enough, so that for example, a Dev team could say, "Okay, I'm going to create this VPC, but this VPC automatically associates your account, you cannot go out on the internet. You have to go to the transit VPC, so there's lot of action in terms of, the IAM part and you have to put the control around them to. So to make it as simple as possible. >> You guys, both. You're the CEO of Aviatrix, but also you've got a lot of experience, going back to networking, going back to the, I call it the OSI days. For us old folks know what that means, but, you guys know what this means. I want to ask you the question. As you look at the future of networking, you hear a couple objections. "Oh, the cloud guys, they got networking, we're all set with them. How do you respond to the fact that networking's changing and the cloud guys have their own networking. What's some of the paying points that's going on premises of these enterprises? So are they good with the clouds? What needs... What are the key things that's going on in networking, that makes it more than just the cloud networking? What's your take on it? >> Well as I said earlier. Once you could easily provision in the cloud, you can easily connect to the cloud, its when you start troubleshooting applications in the cloud and try to scale. So that's where the problem occurred. >> Okay, what's your take on it. >> And you'll hear from the customers, that we have on stage and I think what happens is all the clouds by definition, designed to the 80-20 rule which means they'll design 80% of the basic functionality. And then lead to 20% extra functionality, that of course every Enterprise needs, to leave that to ISV's, like Aviatrix. Because why? Because they have to make money, they have a service and they can't have huge instances, for functionality that not everybody needs. So they have to design to the common and that, they all do it, right? They have to and then the extra, the problem is, that Cambrian explosion, that I talked about with enterprises. That's what they need. They're the ones who need that extra 20%. So that's what I see, there's always going to be that extra functionality. In an automated and simple way, that you talked about, but yet powerful. With the up with the visibility and control, that they expect of On Prem. That kind of combination, that Yin and the Yang, that people like us are providing. >> Simon I want to ask you? We're going to ask some of the cloud architect, customer panels, that same question. There's pioneer's doing some work here and there's also the laggards who come in behind their early adopters. What's going to be the tipping point? What are some of these conversations, that the cloud architects are having out there? Or what's the signs, that they need to be on this, multi-cloud or cloud native networking trend? What are some of the signal's that are going on in the environment? What are some of the thresholds? Are things that are going on, that they can pay attention to? >> Well, once they have the application on multiple cloud and they have to get wake up at two in the morning, to troubleshoot them. They'll know it's important. (laughter) So, I think that's when the rubber will hit the road. But, as I said, it's easier to prove, at any case. Okay, it's AWS, it's easy, user transit gateway, put a few VPC's and you're done. And you create some presents like Equinox and do a Direct Connect and Express Route with Azure. That looks simple, its the operations, that's when they'll realize. Okay, now I need to understand! How cloud networking works? I also need a tool, that gives me visibility and control. But not only that, I need to understand the basic underneath it as well. >> What are some of the day in the life scenarios. you envision happening with multi-cloud, because you think about what's happening. It kind of has that same vibe of interoperability, choice, multi-vendor, 'cause they're multi-cloud. Essentially multi-vendor. These are kind of old paradigms, that we've lived through with client server and internet working. What are some of the scenarios of success, that might be possible? Will be possible, with multi-cloud and cloud native networking. >> Well, I think, once you have good enough visibility, to satisfy your customers, not only, like to, keep the service running and application running. But to be able to provision fast enough, I think that's what you want to achieve. >> Simon, final question. Advice for folks watching on the Livestream, if they're sitting there as a cloud architect or CXO. What's your advice to them right now, in this market, 'cause obviously, public cloud check, hybrid cloud, they're working on that. That gets on premises done, now multi-cloud's right behind it. What's your advice? >> The first thing they should do, is really try to understand cloud networking. For each of their cloud providers and then understand the limitations. And, is what the cloud service provider offers enough? Or you need to look to a third party, but you don't look at a third party to start with. Especially an incumbent one, so it's tempting to say "I have a bunch of F5 experts", nothing against F5. I'm going to bring my F5 in the Cloud, when you can use an ELB, that automatically understand eases and auto scaling and so on. And you understand that's much simpler, but sometimes you need your F5, because you have requirements. You have like iRules and that kind of stuff, that you've used for years. 'cause you cannot do it. Okay, I have requirement and that's not met, I'm going to use Legacy Star and then you have to start thinking, okay, what about visibility control, above the true cloud. But before you do that you have to understand the limitations of the existing cloud providers. First, try to be as native as possible, until things don't work, after that you can start thinking of the cloud. >> Great insight, Simon. Thank you. >> That's great. >> With Gartner, thank you for sharing. (electronic music) >> Welcome back to ALTITUDE 2020. For the folks in the live stream, I'm John Furrier, Steve Mullaney, CEO of Aviatrix. For our first of two customer panels with cloud network architects, we've got Bobby Willoughby, AEGON Luis Castillo from National Instruments and David Shinnick with FactSet. Guys, welcome to the stage for this digital event. Come on up. (audience clapping) (upbeat music) Hey good to see you, thank you. Customer panel, this is my favorite part. We get to hear the real scoop, we get the Gardener giving us the industry overview. Certainly, multi-cloud is very relevant, and cloud-native networking is a hot trend with the live stream out there in the digital events. So guys, let's get into it. The journey is, you guys are pioneering this journey of multi-cloud and cloud-native networking and are soon going to be a lot more coming. So I want to get into the journey. What's it been like? Is it real? You've got a lot of scar tissue? What are some of the learnings? >> Absolutely. Multi-cloud is whether or not we accept it, as network engineers is a reality. Like Steve said, about two years ago, companies really decided to just bite the bullet and move there. Whether or not we accept that fact, we need to not create a consistent architecture across multiple clouds. And that is challenging without orchestration layers as you start managing different tool sets and different languages across different clouds. So it's really important to start thinking about that. >> Guys on the other panelists here, there's different phases of this journey. Some come at it from a networking perspective, some come in from a problem troubleshooting, what's your experiences? >> From a networking perspective, it's been incredibly exciting, it's kind of once in a generational opportunity to look at how you're building out your network. You can start to embrace things like infrastructure as code that maybe your peers on the systems teams have been doing for years, but it just never really worked on-prem. So it's really exciting to look at all the opportunities that we have and all of the interesting challenges that come up that you get to tackle. >> And effects that you guys are mostly AWS, right? >> Yeah. Right now though, we are looking at multiple clouds. We have production workloads running in multiple clouds today but a lot of the initial work has been with Amazon. >> And you've seen it from a networking perspective, that's where you guys are coming at it from? >> Yup. >> Awesome. How about you? >> We evolve more from a customer requirement perspective. Started out primarily as AWS, but as the customer needed more resources from Azure like HPC, Azure AD, things like that, even recently, Google analytics, our journey has evolved into more of a multi-cloud environment. >> Steve, weigh in on the architecture because this is going to be a big conversation, and I wanted you to lead this section. >> I think you guys agree the journey, it seems like the journey started a couple of years ago. Got real serious, the need for multi-cloud, whether you're there today. Of course, it's going to be there in the future. So that's really important. I think the next thing is just architecture. I'd love to hear what you, had some comments about architecture matters, it all starts, every enterprise I talked to. Maybe talk about architecture and the importance of architects, maybe Bobby. >> From architecture perspective, we started our journey five years ago. >> Wow, okay. >> And we're just now starting our fourth evolution over network architect. And we call it networking security net sec, versus just as network. And that fourth-generation architecture should be based primarily upon the Palo Alto Networks and Aviatrix. Aviatrix to new orchestration piece of it. But that journey came because of the need for simplicity, the need for a multi-cloud orchestration without us having to go and do reprogramming efforts across every cloud as it comes along. >> I guess the other question I also had around architecture is also... Luis maybe just talk about it. I know we've talked a little bit about scripting, and some of your thoughts on that. >> Absolutely. So for us, we started creating the network constructs with cloud formation, and we've stuck with that for the most part. What's interesting about that is today, on-premise, we have a lot of automation around how we provision networks, but cloud formation has become a little bit like the new manual for us. We're now having issues with having to automate that component and making it consistent with our on-premise architecture and making it consistent with Azure architecture and Google cloud. So, it's really interesting to see companies now bring that layer of abstraction that SD-WAN brought to the wound side, now it's going up into the cloud networking architecture. >> Great. So on the fourth generation, you mentioned you're on the fourth-gen architecture. What have you learned? Is there any lessons, scratch issue, what to avoid, what worked? What was the path that you touched? >> It's probably the biggest lesson there is that when you think you finally figured it out, you haven't. Amazon will change something, Azure change something. Transit Gateway is a game-changer. And listening to the business requirements is probably the biggest thing we need to do upfront. But I think from a simplicity perspective, like I said, we don't want to do things four times. We want to do things one time, we want be able to write to an API which Aviatrix has and have them do the orchestration for us. So that we don't have to do it four times. >> How important is architecture in the progression? Is it do you guys get thrown in the deep end, to solve these problems, are you guys zooming out and looking at it? How are you guys looking at the architecture? >> You can't get off the ground if you don't have the network there. So all of those, we've gone through similar evolutions, we're on our fourth or fifth evolution. I think about what we started off with Amazon without Direct Connect Gateway, without Transit Gateway, without a lot of the things that are available today, kind of the 80, 20 that Steve was talking about. Just because it wasn't there doesn't mean we didn't need it. So we needed to figure out a way to do it, we couldn't say, "Oh, you need to come back to the network team in a year, and maybe Amazon will have a solution for it." We need to do it now and evolve later and maybe optimize or change the way you're doing things in the future. But don't sit around and wait, you can't. >> I'd love to have you guys each individually answer this question for the live streams that comes up a lot. A lot of cloud architects out in the community, what should they be thinking about the folks that are coming into this proactively and, or realizing the business benefits are there? What advice would you guys give them on architecture? What should be they'd be thinking about, and what are some guiding principles you could share? >> So I would start with looking at an architecture model that can spread and give consistency to the different cloud vendors that you will absolutely have to support. Cloud vendors tend to want to pull you into using their native tool set, and that's good if only it was realistic to talk about only one cloud. But because it doesn't, it's super important to talk about, and have a conversation with the business and with your technology teams about a consistent model. >> And how do I do my day one work so that I'm not spending 80% of my time troubleshooting or managing my network? Because if I'm doing that, then I'm missing out on ways that I can make improvements or embrace new technologies. So it's really important early on to figure out, how do I make this as low maintenance as possible so that I can focus on the things that the team really should be focusing on? >> Bobby, your advice there, architecture. >> I don't know what else I can add to that. Simplicity of operations is key. >> So the holistic view of day two operations you mentioned, let's can jump in day one as you're getting stuff set up, day two is your life after. This is kind of of what you're getting at, David. So what does that look like? What are you envisioning as you look at that 20-mile stair, out post multi-cloud world? What are some of the things that you want in the day two operations? >> Infrastructure as code is really important to us. So how do we design it so that we can start fit start making network changes and fitting them into a release pipeline and start looking at it like that, rather than somebody logging into a router CLI and troubleshooting things in an ad hoc nature? So, moving more towards a dev-ops model. >> You guys, anything to add on that day two? >> Yeah, I would love to add something. In terms of day two operations you can either sort of ignore the day two operations for a little while, where you get your feet wet, or you can start approaching it from the beginning. The fact is that the cloud-native tools don't have a lot of maturity in that space and when you run into an issue, you're going to end up having a bad day, going through millions and millions of logs just to try to understand what's going on. That's something that the industry just now is beginning to realize it's such a big gap. >> I think that's key because for us, we're moving to more of an event-driven or operations. In the past, monitoring got the job done. It's impossible to monitor something that is not there when the event happens. So the event-driven application and then detection is important. >> Gardner is all about the cloud-native wave coming into networking. That's going to be a serious thing. I want to get your guys' perspective, I know you have each different views of how you come into the journey and how you're executing. And I always say the beauty's in the eye of the beholder and that applies to how the network's laid out. So, Bobby, you guys do a lot of high-performance encryption, both on AWS and Azure. That's a unique thing for you. How are you seeing that impact with multi-cloud? >> That's a new requirement for us too, where we have an increment to encrypt. And then if you ever get the question, should I encrypt, should I not encrypt? The answer is always yes. You should encrypt when you can encrypt. For our perspective, we need to migrate a bunch of data from our data centers. We have some huge data centers, and getting that data to the cloud is a timely expense in some cases. So we have been mandated, we have to encrypt everything, leave in the data center. So we're looking at using the Aviatrix insane mode appliances to be able to encrypt 10, 20 gigabits of data as it moves to the cloud itself. >> David, you're using Terraform, you've got FireNet, you've got a lot of complexity in your network. What do you guys look at the future for your environment? >> So many exciting that we're working on now as FireNet. So for our security team that obviously have a lot of knowledge base around Palo Alto, and with our commitments to our clients, it's not very easy to shift your security model to a specific cloud vendor. So there's a lot of SOC 2 compliance and things like that were being able to take some of what you've worked on for years on-prem and put it in the cloud and have the same type of assurance that things are going to work and be secure in the same way that they are on-prem, helps make that journey into the cloud a lot easier. >> And Louis, you guys got scripting, you got a lot of things going on. What's your unique angle on this? >> Absolutely. So for disclosure, I'm not an Aviatrix customer yet. (laughs) >> It's okay, we want to hear the truth, so that's good. Tell us, what are you thinking about? What's on your mind? >> When you talk about implementing a tool like this, it's really just really important to talk about automation focus on value. When you talk about things like encryption and things like so you're encrypting tunnels and encrypting the path, and those things should be second nature really. When you look at building those back-ends and managing them with your team, it becomes really painful. So tools like Aviatrix that add a lot automation it's out of sight, out of mind. You can focus on the value, and you don't have to focus on this. >> So I got to ask you guys. I see Aviatrix was here, they're supplier to this sector, but you guys are customers. Everyone's pitching your stuff, people knock on you, "Buy my stuff." How do you guys have that conversation with the suppliers, like the cloud vendors and other folks? What's it like? We're API all the way? You've got to support this? What are some of your requirements? How do you talk to and evaluate people that walk in and want to knock on your door and pitch you something? What's the conversation like? >> It's definitely API driven. We definitely look at the API structure that the vendors provide before we select anything. That is always first of mine and also, what problem are we really trying to solve? Usually, people try to sell or try to give us something that isn't really valuable, like implementing a Cisco solution on the cloud doesn't really add a lot of value, that's where we go. >> David, what's your conversation like with suppliers? Do you have a certain new way to do things? As it becomes more agile, essentially networking, and getting more dynamic, what are some of the conversations with either in commits or new vendors that you're having? What do you require? >> Ease of use is definitely high up there. We've had some vendors come in and say, "Hey, when you go to set this up, "we're going to want to send somebody on-site." And they're going to sit with you for a day to configure it. And that's a red flag. Well, wait a minute, do we really, if one of my really talented engineers can't figure it out on his own, what's going on there and why is that? Having some ease of use and the team being comfortable with it and understanding it is really important. >> Bobby, how about you? Old days was, do a bake-off and the winner takes all. Is it like that anymore? What's evolving? Bake-off last year for but still win. But that's different now because now when you get the product, you can install the product in AWS and Azure, have it up running in a matter of minutes. So the key is that can you be operational within hours or days instead of weeks? But do we also have the flexibility to customize it, to meet your needs? Because you don't want to be put into a box with the other customers when you have needs that are past their needs. >> I can almost see the challenge that you guys are living, where you've got the cloud immediate value, depending how you can roll up any solutions, but then you might have other needs. So you've got to be careful not to buy into stuff that's not shipping. So you're trying to be proactive and at the same time, deal with what you got. How do you guys see that evolving? Because multi-cloud to me is definitely relevant, but it's not yet clear how to implement across. How do you guys look at this baked versus future solutions coming? How do you balance that? >> Again, so right now, we're taking the ad hoc approach and experimenting what the different concepts of cloud are and really leveraging the native constructs of each cloud. But there's a breaking point for sure. You don't get to scale this like someone said, and you have to focus on being able to deliver, developers their sandbox or their play area for the things that they're trying to build quickly. And the only way to do that is with some consistent orchestration layer that allows you to-- >> So you expect a lot more stuff to becoming pretty quickly in that area. >> I do expect things to start maturing quite quickly this year. >> And you guys see similar trend, new stuff coming fast? >> Yeah. Probably the biggest challenge we've got now is being able to segment within the network, being able to provide segmentation between production, non-production workloads, even businesses, because we support many businesses worldwide and isolation between those is a key criteria there. So the ability to identify and quickly isolate those workloads is key. So the CIOs that are watching are saying, "Hey, take that hill, do multi-cloud." And then you have the bottoms up organization, "Pause, you're like off a little bit, it's not how it works." What is the reality in terms of implementing as fast as possible? Because the business benefits are clear, but it's not always clear on the technology how to move that fast. What are some of the barriers, what are the blockers, what are the enablers? >> I think the reality is that you may not think you're multi-cloud, but your business is. So I think the biggest barrier there is understanding what the requirements are and how best to meet those requirements in a secure manner. Because you need to make sure that things are working from a latency perspective that things work the way they did and get out of the mind shift that it was a tier-three application and the data center, it doesn't have to be a tier-three application in the cloud. So, lift and shift is not the way to go. >> Scale is a big part of what I see is the competitive advantage by these clouds and used to be proprietary network stacks in the old days, and then open systems came, that was a good thing. But as cloud has become bigger, there's an inherent lock-in there with the scale. How do you guys keep the choice open? How are you guys thinking about interoperability? What are some of the conversations that you guys are having around those key concepts? >> When we look at from a networking perspective, it's really key for you to just enable all the class to be able to communicate between them. Developers will find a way to use the cloud that best suits their business needs. And like you said, it's whether you're in denial or not, of the multi-cloud fact that your company is in already that's it becomes really important for you to move quickly. >> Yeah. And a lot of it also hinges on how well is the provider embracing what that specific cloud is doing? So, are they swimming with Amazon or Azure and just helping facilitate things, and they're doing the heavy lifting API work for you? Or are they swimming upstream and they're trying to hack it all together in messy way? And so that helps you stay out of the lock-in because there, if they're using Amazon native tools to help you get where you need to be, it's not like Amazon is going to release something in the future that completely makes you have designed yourself into a corner. So the closer, more than cloud-native they are, the more, the easier it is to deploy. >> Which also need to be aligned in such a way that you can take advantage of those cloud-native technologies. Will it make sense? TGW is a gamechanger in terms of cost and performance. So to completely ignore that, would be wrong. But if you needed to have encryption, TGW is not encrypted, so you need to have some type of Gateway to do the VPN encryption. So, the Aviatrix tool will give you the beauty of both worlds. You can use TGW or the Gateway. Real quick on the last minute we have, I want to just get a quick feedback from you guys. I hear a lot of people say to me, "Hey, pick the best cloud for the workload you got, then figure out multicloud behind the scenes." Do you guys agree with that? Do I go more to one cloud across the whole company or this workload works great on AWS, that workload works great on this. From a cloud standpoint, do you agree with that premise, and then when is multi-cloud stitching altogether? >> From an application perspective, it can be per workload, but it can also be an economical decision, certain enterprise contracts will pull you in one direction to add value, but the network problem is still the same. >> It doesn't go away. >> You don't want to be trying to fit a square into a round hall. If it works better on that cloud provider, then it's our job to make sure that service is there and people can use it. >> I agree, you just need to stay ahead of the game, make sure that the network infrastructure is there, security is available and is multi-cloud capable. >> At the end of the day, you guys are just validating that it's the networking game now. Cloud storage, compute check, networking is where the action is. Awesome. Thanks for your insights guys, appreciate you coming on the panel. Appreciate it, thanks. (upbeat music) >> John: Our next customer panel, got great another set of cloud network architects, Justin Smith with Zuora, Justin Brodley with EllieMae and Amit Utreja with Coupa. Welcome to stage. (audience applauds) (upbeat music) >> All right, thank you. >> How are ya? >> Thank you. Thank You. >> Hey Amit. How are ya? >> Did he say it right? >> Yeah. >> Okay he's got all the cliff notes from the last session, welcome back. Rinse and repeat. We're going to go into the hood a little bit. And I think they nailed what we've been reporting, we've been having this conversation around, networking is where the action is because that's at the end of the day you got to move packet from A to B and you got workloads exchanging data. So it's really killer. So let's get started. Amit, what are you seeing as the journey of multicloud as you go under the hood and say, "Okay, I got to implement this. "I have to engineer the network, "make it enabling, make it programmable, "make it interoperable across clouds." That almost sounds impossible to me. What's your take? >> Yeah, it seems impossible but if you are running an organization which is running infrastructure as a code it is easily doable. Like you can use tools out there that's available today, you can use third party products that can do a better job. But put your architecture first, don't wait. Architecture may not be perfect, put the best architecture that's available today and be agile, to iterate and make improvements over the time. >> We get to Justin's over here, so I have to be careful when I point a question to Justin, they both have the answer. Okay, journeys, what's the journey been like? Is there phases, We heard that from Gardner, people come into multicloud and cloud native networking from different perspectives? What's your take on the journey, Justin? >> Yeah, from our perspective, we started out very much focused on one cloud and as we've started doing acquisitions, we started doing new products to the market, the need for multicloud becomes very apparent, very quickly for us. And so having an architecture that we can plug and play into and be able to add and change things as it changes is super important for what we're doing in the space. >> Justin, your journey. >> Yes. For us, we were very ad hoc oriented and the idea is that we were reinventing all the time, trying to move into these new things and coming up with great new ideas. And so rather than it being some iterative approach with our deployments that became a number of different deployments. And so we shifted that toward and the network has been a real enabler of this. There's one network and it touches whatever cloud we want it to touch, and it touches the data centers that we need it to touch, and it touches the customers that we needed to touch. Our job is to make sure that the services that are available in one of those locations are available in all of the locations. So the idea is not that we need to come up with this new solution every time, it's that we're just iterating on what we've already decided to do. >> Before we get the architecture section, I want to ask you guys a question? I'm a big fan of let the app developers have infrastructure as code, so check. But having the right cloud run that workload, I'm a big fan of that, if it works great. But we just heard from the other panel, you can't change the network. So I want to get your thoughts, what is cloud native networking? And is that the engine really, that's the enabler for this multicloud trend? What's you guys take? We'll start with Amit, what do you think about that? >> Yeah, so you're going to have workloads running in different clouds and the workloads would have affinity to one cloud or other. But how you expose that it's a matter of how you are going to build your networks. How you're going to run security. How you're going to do egress, ingress out of it so -- >> You said networking is the big problem to solve. >> Yes. >> What's the solution? What's the key pain points and problem statement? >> The key pain point for most companies is how do you take your traditionally on premise network and then blow it out to the cloud in a way that makes sense. You have IP conflicts, you have IP space, you have public IPs on premise as well as in the cloud. And how do you kind of make sense of all of that? And I think that's where tools like Aviatrix make a lot of sense in that space. >> From our side, it's really simple. It's a latency, it's bandwidth and availability. These don't change whether we're talking about cloud or data center, or even corporate IT networking. So our job when these all of these things are simplified into like, S3, for instance and our developers want to use those. We have to be able to deliver that and for a particular group or another group that wants to use just just GCP resources. We have to support these requirements and these wants, as opposed to saying, "Hey, that's not a good idea." No, our job is to enable them not to disable them. >> Do you guys think infrastructure is code? Which I love that, I think that's the future in this. We even saw that with DevOps. But as you start getting the networking, is it getting down to the network portion where its network as code? Because storage and compute working really well, we're seeing all Kubernetes on service mesh trend. Network has code, reality is it there? Is it still got work to do? >> It's absolutely there, you mentioned net DevOps and it's very real. In Coupa we build our networks through terraform and not only just terraform, build an API so that we can consistently build VNets and VPC all across in the same way. >> So you guys are doing it? >> Yup. And even security groups. And then on top and Aviatrix comes in, we can peer the networks bridge all the different regions through code. >> Same with you guys. >> Yeah. >> What do you think about this? >> Everything we deploy is done with automation and then we also run things like Lambda on top to make changes in real time, we don't make manual changes on our network. In the data center, funny enough, it's still manual but the cloud has enabled us to move into this automation mindset. And all my guys, that's what they focus on is bringing, now what they're doing in the cloud into the data center, which is kind of opposite of what it should be or what it used to be. >> It's full DevOps then? >> Yes. >> For us, it was similar on-prem is still somewhat very manual, although we're moving more and more to ninja and terraform type concepts. But everything in the production environment is code, confirmation terraform code and now coming into the data center same (mumbles). >> So I just wanted to jump in Justin Smith, one of the comment that you made, because it's something that we always talk about a lot is that the center of gravity of architecture used to be an on-prem and now it's shifted in the cloud. And once you have your strategic architecture, what do you do? You push that everywhere. So what you used to see at the beginning of cloud was pushing the architecture on-prem into cloud. Now, I want to pick up on what you said, do you others agree that the center of gravity is here, I'm now pushing what I do in the cloud back into on-prem? And then so first that and then also in the journey, where are you at from zero to 100 of actually in the journey to cloud? Are you 50% there, are you 10%? Are you evacuating data centers next year? Where are you guys at? >> Yeah, so there's there's two types of gravity that you typically are dealing with, with the migration. First is data, gravity and your data set, and where that data lives. And then the second is the network platform that wraps all that together. In our case, the data gravity solely mostly on-prem but our network is now extending out to the app tier, it's going to be in cloud. Eventually, that data, gravity will also move to cloud as we start getting more sophisticated but in our journey, we're about halfway there. About halfway through the process, we're taking a handle of lift and shift and -- >> Steve: And when did that start? >> We started about three years ago. >> Okay, okay. >> Well for Coupa it's a very different story. It started from a garage and 100% on the cloud. So it's a business plan management platform, software as a service run 100% on the cloud. >> That was was like 10 years ago, right? >> Yes. >> Yeah. >> You guys are riding the wave of the architecture. Justin I want to ask you, Zuora, you guys mentioned DevOps. Obviously, we saw the huge observability wave, which essentially network management for the cloud, in my opinion. It's more dynamic, but this is about visibility. We heard from the last panel you don't know what's being turned on or turned off from a services standpoint, at any given time. How is all this playing out when you start getting into the DevOps down (mumbles)? >> This is the big challenge for all of us is visibility. When you talk transport within a cloud, very interestingly we we have moved from having a backbone that we bought, that we own, that would be data center connectivity. Zuora's a subscription billing company, so we want to support the subscription mindset. So rather than going and buying circuits and having to wait three months to install and then coming up with some way to get things connected and resiliency and redundancy. My backbone is in the cloud. I use the cloud providers interconnections between regions to transport data across and so if you do that with their native solutions, you do lose visibility. There are areas in that that you don't get, which is why controllers and having some type of management plane is a requirement for us to do what we're supposed to do and provide consistency while doing it. >> Great conversation. I loved what you said earlier latency, bandwidth, I think availability were your top three things. Guys SLA, just do ping times between clouds it's like, you don't know what you're getting for round trip time. This becomes a huge kind of risk management, black hole, whatever you want to call it, blind spot. How are you guys looking at the interconnect between clouds? Because I can see that working from ground to cloud on per cloud but when you start dealing with multiclouds workloads, SLAs will be all over the map, won't they just inherently. How do you guys view that? >> Yeah, I think we talked about workload and we know that the workloads are going to be different in different clouds, but they're going to be calling each other. So it's very important to have that visibility, that you can see how data is flowing at what latency and what availability is there and our authority needs to operate on that. >> So use the software dashboard, look at the times and look at the latency -- >> In the old days, Strongswan Openswan you try to figure it out, in the new days you have to figure out. >> Justin, what's your answer to that because you're in the middle of it? >> Yeah, I think the key thing there is that we have to plan for that failure, we have to plan for that latency in our applications. If certain things are tracking in your SLI, certain things are planning for and you loosely coupled these services in a much more microservices approach. So you actually can handle that kind of failure or that type of unknown latency and unfortunately, the cloud has made us much better at handling exceptions in a much better way. >> You guys are all great examples of cloud native from day one. When did you have the tipping point moment or the epiphany of saying a multiclouds real, I can't ignore it, I got to factor that into all my design principles and everything you're doing? Was there a moment or was it from day one? >> There are two reasons, one was the business. So in business, there were some affinity to not be in one cloud or to be in one cloud and that drove from the business side. So as a cloud architect our responsibility was to support that business. Another is the technology, some things are really running better in, like if you're running Dotnet workload or your going to run machine learning or AI so that you would have that preference of one cloud over other. >> Guys, any thoughts on that? >> That was the bill that we got from AWS. That's what drives a lot of these conversations is the financial viability of what you're building on top of. This failure domain idea which is fairly interesting. How do I solve our guarantee against a failure domain? You have methodologies with back end direct connects or interconnect with GCP. All of these ideas are something that you have to take into account but that transport layer should not matter to whoever we're building this for. Our job is to deliver the frames and the packets, what that flows across, how you get there? We want to make that seamless. And so whether it's a public internet API call or it's a back end connectivity through direct connect, it doesn't matter. It just has to meet a contract that you've signed with your application, folks. >> Yeah, that's the availability piece. >> Justin, your thoughts on that, any comment on that? >> So actually multiclouds become something much more recent in the last six to eight months, I'd say. We always kind of had a very much an attitude of like moving to Amazon from our private cloud is hard enough, why complicate it further? But the realities of the business and as we start seeing, improvements in Google and Azure and different technology spaces, the need for multicloud becomes much more important. As well as our acquisition strategies are matured, we're seeing that companies that used to be on premise that we typically acquire are now very much already on a cloud. And if they're on a cloud, I need to plug them into our ecosystem. And so that's really changed our multicloud story in a big way. >> I'd love to get your thoughts on the clouds versus the clouds, because you compare them Amazon's got more features, they're rich with features. Obviously, the bills are high to people using them. But Google's got a great network, Google's networks pretty damn good And then you got Azure. What's the difference between the clouds? Where do they fall? Where do they peak in certain areas better than others? What are the characteristics, which makes one cloud better? Do they have a unique feature that makes Azure better than Google and vice versa? What do you guys think about the different clouds? >> Yeah, to my experience, I think the approach is different in many places. Google has a different approach very DevOps friendly and you can run your workloads with your network can span regions. But our application ready to accept that. Amazon is evolving. I remember 10 years back Amazon's network was a flat network, we would be launching servers in 10.0.0/8, right. And then the VPCs came out. >> We'll have to translate that to English for the live feed. Not good. So the VPCs concept came out, multi account came out, so they are evolving. Azure had a late start but because they have a late start, they saw the pattern and they have some mature setup on the network. >> They've got around the same price too. >> I think they're all trying to say they're equal in their own ways. I think they all have very specific design philosophies that allow them to be successful in different ways and you have to kind of keep that in mind as you architect your own solution. For example, Amazon has a very regional affinity, they don't like to go cross region in their architecture. Whereas Google is very much it's a global network, we're going to think about as a global solution. I think Google also has advantage that it's third to market and so has seen what Azure did wrong, it seeing what AWS did wrong and it's made those improvements and I think that's one of their big advantage. >> They got great scale too. Justin thoughts on the cloud. >> So yeah, Amazon built from the system up and Google built from the network down. So their ideas and approaches are from a global versus original, I agree with you completely that is the big number one thing. But the if you look at it from the outset, interestingly, the inability or the ability for Amazon to limit layer to broadcasting and what that really means from a VPC perspective, changed all the routing protocols you can use. All the things that we had built inside of a data center to provide resiliency and make things seamless to users, all of that disappeared. And so because we had to accept that at the VPC level, now we have to accept that at the WAN level. Google's done a better job of being able to overcome those things and provide those traditional network facilities to us. >> Just a great panel, we could go all day here, it's awesome. So I heard, we will get to the cloud native naive questions. So kind of think about what's naive and what's cloud, I'll ask that next but I got to ask you I had a conversation with a friend he's like, "WAN is the new LAN?" So if you think about what the LAN was at a data center, WAN is the new LAN, cause you keep talking about the cloud impact? So that means ST-WAN, the old ST-WAN kind of changing. There's a new LAN. How do you guys look at that? Because if you think about it, what LANs were for inside a premises was all about networking, high speed. But now when you take the WAN and make it, essentially a LAN, do you agree with that? And how do you view this trend? Is it good or bad or is it ugly? What you guys take on this? >> Yeah, I think it's a thing that you have to work with your application architects. So if you are managing networks and if you're a server engineer, you need to work with them to expose the unreliability that it would bring in. So the application has to handle a lot of the difference in the latencies and the reliability has to be worked through the application there. >> LAN, WAN, same concept is that BS? Can you give some insight? >> I think we've been talking about for a long time the erosion of the edge. And so is this just a continuation of that journey we've been on for last several years. As we get more and more cloud native and we talked about API's, the ability to lock my data in place and not be able to access it really goes away. And so I think this is just continuation. I think it has challenges. We start talking about WAN scale versus LAN scale, the tooling doesn't work the same, the scale of that tooling is much larger. and the need to automation is much, much higher in a WAN than it wasn't a LAN. That's why you're seeing so much infrastructure as code. >> Yeah. So for me, I'll go back again to this, it's bandwidth and its latency that define those two LAN versus WAN. But the other thing that's comes up more and more with cloud deployments is whereas our security boundary and where can I extend this secure aware appliance or set of rules to protect what's inside of it. So for us, we're able to deliver VRFs or route forwarding tables for different segments wherever we're at in the world. And so they're trusted to talk to each other but if they're going to go to someplace that's outside of their network, then they have to cross the security boundary, where we enforce policy very heavily. So for me, there's it's not just LAN, WAN it's how does environment get to environment more importantly. >> That's a great point in security, we haven't talked it yet but that's got to be baked in from the beginning, this architecture. Thoughts on security, how you guys are dealing with it? >> Yeah, start from the base, have app to app security built in. Have TLS, have encryption on the data at transit, data at rest. But as you bring the application to the cloud and they're going to go multicloud, talking to over the internet, in some places, well have app to app security. >> Our principles day, security is day zero every day. And so we always build it into our design, build into our architecture, into our applications. It's encrypt everything, it's TLS everywhere. It's make sure that that data is secure at all times. >> Yeah, one of the cool trends at RSA, just as a side note was the data in use encryption piece, which is homomorphic stuff was interesting. Alright guys, final question. We heard on the earlier panel was also trending at re:Invent, we think the T out of cloud native, it spells cloud naive. They have shirts now, Aviatrix kind of got this trend going. What does that mean to be naive? To your peers out there watching the live stream and also the suppliers that are trying to supply you guys with technology and services, what's naive look like and what's native look like? When is someone naive about implementing all this stuff? >> So for me, because we are in 100% cloud, for us its main thing is ready for the change. And you will find new building blocks coming in and the network design will evolve and change. So don't be naive and think that it's static, evolve with the change. >> I think the biggest naivety that people have is that well, I've been doing it this way for 20 years, I've been successful, it's going to be successful in cloud. The reality is that's not the case. You got to think some of the stuff a little bit differently and you need to think about it early enough, so that you can become cloud native and really enable your business on cloud. >> Yeah for me it's being open minded. Our industry, the network industry as a whole, has been very much I'm smarter than everybody else and we're going to tell everybody how it's going to be done. And we fell into a lull when it came to producing infrastructure and so embracing this idea that we can deploy a new solution or a new environment in minutes as opposed to hours, or weeks or months in some cases, is really important in and so >> - >> It's naive being closed minded, native being open minded. >> Exactly. For me that was a transformative kind of where I was looking to solve problems in a cloud way as opposed to looking to solve problems in this traditional old school way. >> All right, I know we're at a time but I got to asked one more question, so you guys so good. Give me a quick answer. What's the BS language when you, the BS meter goes off when people talk to you about solutions? What's the kind of jargon that you hear, that's the BS meter going off? What are people talking about that in your opinion you here you go, "That's total BS?" What triggers you? >> So that I have two lines out of movies if I say them without actually thinking them. It's like 1.21 gigawatts are you out of your mind from Back to the Future right? Somebody's giving you all these wiz bang things. And then Martin Maul and Michael Keaton in Mr Mom when he goes to 220, 221, whatever it takes. >> Yeah. >> Those two right there, if those go off in my mind where somebody's talking to me, I know they're full of baloney. >> So a lot of speeds and feeds, a lot of speeds and feeds a lot of -- >> Just data. Instead of talking about what you're actually doing and solutioning for. You're talking about, "Well, it does this this this." Okay to 220, 221. (laughter) >> Justin, what's your take? >> Anytime I start seeing the cloud vendors start benchmarking against each other. Your workload is your workload, you need to benchmark yourself. Don't listen to the marketing on that, that's just awful. >> Amit, what triggers you in the BS meter? >> I think if somebody explains to you are not simple, they cannot explain you in simplicity, then it's all bull shit. >> (laughs) That's a good one. Alright guys, thanks for the great insight, great panel. How about a round of applause to practitioners. (audience applauds) (upbeat music) >> John: Okay, welcome back to Altitude 2020 for the digital event for the live feed. Welcome back, I'm John Furrier with theCUBE with Steve Mullaney, CEO Aviatrix. For the next panel from Global System Integrated, the folks who are building and working with folks on their journey to multicloud and cloud-native networking. We've got a great panel, George Buckman with DXC and Derrick Monahan with WWT, welcome to the stage. (Audience applauds) >> Hey >> Thank you >> Groovy spot >> All right (upbeat music) >> Okay, you guys are the ones out there advising, building, and getting down and dirty with multicloud and cloud-native networking, we just heard from the customer panel. You can see the diversity of where people come in to the journey of cloud, it kind of depends upon where you are, but the trends are all clear, cloud-native networking, DevOps, up and down the stack, this has been the main engine. What's your guys' take of this journey to multicloud? What do you guys think? >> Yeah, it's critical, I mean we're seeing all of our enterprise customers enter into this, they've been through the migrations of the easy stuff, ya know? Now they're trying to optimize and get more improvements, so now the tough stuff's coming on, right? They need their data processing near where their data is. So that's driving them to a multicloud environment. >> Yeah, we've heard some of the Edge stuff, I mean, you guys are-- >> Exactly. >> You've seen this movie before, but now it's a whole new ballgame, what's your take? Yeah, so, I'll give you a hint, our practice is not called the cloud practice, it's the multicloud practice, and so if that gives you a hint of how we approach things. It's very consultative. And so when we look at what the trends are, like a year ago. About a year ago we were having conversations with customers, "Let's build a data center in the cloud. Let's put some VPCs, let's throw some firewalls, let's put some DNS and other infrastructure out there and let's hope it works." This isn't a science project. What we're starting to see is customers are starting to have more of a vision, we're helping with that consultative nature, but it's totally based on the business. And you've got to start understanding how lines of business are using the apps and then we evolve into the next journey which is a foundational approach to-- >> What are some of the problems some of your customers are solving when they come to you? What are the top things that are on their mind, obviously the ease of use, agility, all that stuff, what specifically are they digging into? >> Yeah, so complexity, I think when you look at a multicloud approach, in my view is, network requirements are complex. You know, I think they are, but I think the approach can be, "Let's simplify that." So one thing that we try to do, and this is how we talk to customers is, just like you simplify in Aviatrix, simplifies the automation orchestration of cloud networking, we're trying to simplify the design, the plan, and implementation of the infrastructure across multiple workloads, across multiple platforms. And so the way we do it, is we sit down, we look at not just use cases, not just the questions we commonly anticipate, we actually build out, based on the business and function requirements, we build out a strategy and then create a set of documents, and guess what? We actually build it in a lab, and that lab that we platform rebuilt, proves out this reference architectural actually works. >> Absolutely, we implement similar concepts. I mean, they're proven practices, they work, right? >> But George, you mentioned that the hard part's now upon us, are you referring to networking, what specifically were you getting at there when you said, "The easy part's done, now the hard part?" >> So for the enterprises themselves, migrating their more critical apps or more difficult apps into the environments, ya know, we've just scratched the surface, I believe, on what enterprises are doing to move into the cloud, to optimize their environments, to take advantage of the scale and speed to deployment and to be able to better enable their businesses. So they're just now really starting to-- >> So do you guys see what I talked about? I mean, in terms of that Cambrian explosion, I mean, you're both monster system integrators with top fortune enterprise customers, you know, really rely on you for guidance and consulting and so forth, and deploy their networks. Is that something that you've seen? I mean, does that resonate? Did you notice a year and a half ago all of a sudden the importance of cloud for enterprise shoot up? >> Yeah, I mean, we're seeing it now. >> Okay. >> In our internal environment as well, ya know, we're a huge company ourselves, customer zero, our internal IT, so, we're experiencing that internally and every one of our other customers as well. >> So I have another question and I don't know the answer to this, and a lawyer never asks a question that you don't know the answer to, but I'm going to ask it anyway. DXC and WWT, massive system integrators, why Aviatrix? >> Great question, Steve, so I think the way we approach things, I think we have a similar vision, a similar strategy, how you approach things, how we approach things, at World Wide Technology. Number one, we want a simplify the complexity. And so that's your number one priority. Let's take the networking, let's simplify it, and I think part of the other point I'm making is we see this automation piece as not just an after thought anymore. If you look at what customers care about, visibility and automation is probably at the top three, maybe the third on the list, and I think that's where we see the value. I think the partnership that we're building and what I get excited about is not just putting yours and our lab and showing customers how it works, it's co-developing a solution with you. Figuring out, "Hey, how can we make this better?" >> Right >> Visibility is a huge thing, just in security alone, network everything's around visibility. What automation do you see happening, in terms of progression, order of operations, if you will? What's the low hanging fruit? What are people working on now? What are some of the aspirational goals around when you start thinking about multicloud and automation? >> So I wanted to get back to his question. >> Answer that question. >> I wanted to answer your question, you know, what led us there and why Aviatrix. You know, in working some large internal IT projects, and looking at how we were going to integrate those solutions, you know, we like to build everything with recipes. Network is probably playing catch-up in the DevOps world but with a DevOps mindset, looking to speed to deploy, support, all those things, so when you start building your recipe, you take a little of this, a little of that, and you mix it all together, well, when you look around, you say, "Wow, look, there's this big bag of Aviatrix. "Let me plop that in. That solves a big part "of my problems that I had, the speed to integrate, "the speed to deploy, and the operational views "that I need to run this." So that was what led me to-- >> John: So how about reference architectures? >> Yeah, absolutely, so, you know, they came with a full slate of reference architectures already out there and ready to go that fit our needs, so it was very easy for us to integrate those into our recipes. >> What do you guys think about all the multi-vendor inter-operability conversations that have been going on? Choice has been a big part of multicloud in terms of, you know, customers want choice, they'll put a workload in the cloud if it works, but this notion of choice and interoperability has become a big conversation. >> It is, and I think that our approach, and that's the way we talk to customers is, "Let's speed and de-risk that decision making process, "and how do we do that?" Because interoperability is key. You're not just putting, it's not just a single vendor, we're talking, you know, many many vendors, I mean think about the average number of cloud applications a customer uses, a business, an enterprise business today, you know, it's above 30, it's skyrocketing and so what we do, and we look at it from an interoperability approach is, "How do things inter-operate?" We test it out, we validate it, we build a reference architecture that says, "These are the critical design elements, "now let's build one with Aviatrix "and show how this works with Aviatrix." And I think the important part there, though, is the automation piece that we add to it and visibility. So I think the visibility is what I see lacking across industry today. >> In cloud-native that's been a big topic. >> Yep >> Okay, in terms of Aviatrix, as you guys see them coming in, they're one of the ones that are emerging and the new brands emerging with multicloud, you've still got the old guard encumbered with huge footprints. How are customers dealing with that kind of component in dealing with both of them? >> Yeah, I mean, we have customers that are ingrained with a particular vendor and you know, we have partnerships with many vendors. So our objective is to provide the solution that meets that client. >> John: And they all want multi-vendor, they all want interoperability. >> Correct. >> All right, so I got to ask you guys a question while we were defining Day-2 operations. What does that mean? You guys are looking at the big business and technical components of architecture, what does Day-2 operations mean, what's the definition of that? >> Yeah, so I think from our perspective, with my experience, we, you know, Day-2 operations, whether it's not just the orchestration piece in setting up and let it automate and have some, you know, change control, you're looking at this from a Day-2 perspective, "How do I support this ongoing "and make it easy to make changes as we evolve?" The cloud is very dynamic. The nature of how fast it's expanding, the number features is astonishing. Trying to keep up to date with the number of just networking capabilities and services that are added. So I think Day-2 operations starts with a fundamental understanding of building out supporting a customer's environments, and making the automation piece easy from a distance, I think. >> Yeah and, you know, taking that to the next level of being able to enable customers to have catalog items that they can pick and choose, "Hey I need this network connectivity "from this cloud location back to this on-prem." And being able to have that automated and provisioned just simply by ordering it. >> For the folks watching out there, guys, take a minute to explain as you guys are in the trenches doing a lot of good work. What are some of the engagements that you guys get into? How does that progress? What happens there, they call you up and say, "Hey I need some multicloud," or you're already in there? I mean, take us through how someone can engage to use a global SI, they come in and make this thing happen, what's the typical engagement look like? >> Derrick: Yeah, so from our perspective, we typically have a series of workshops in the methodology that we kind of go along the journey. Number one, we have a foundational approach. And I don't mean foundation meaning the network foundation, that's a very critical element, we got to factor in security and we got to factor in automation. So when you think about foundation, we do a workshop that starts with education. A lot of times we'll go in and we'll just educate the customer, what is VPC sharing? You know, what is a private link in Azure? How does that impact your business? We have customers that want to share services out in an ecosystem with other customers and partners. Well there's many ways to accomplish that. Our goal is to understand those requirements and then build that strategy with them. >> Thoughts George, on-- >> Yeah, I mean, I'm one of the guys that's down in the weeds making things happen, so I'm not the guy on the front line interfacing with the customers every day. But we have a similar approach. We have a consulting practice that will go out and apply their practices to see what those-- >> And when do you parachute in? >> Yeah, when I parachute in is, I'm on the back end working with our offering development leads for networking, so we understand and are seeing what customers are asking for and we're on the back end developing the solutions that integrate with our own offerings as well as enable other customers to just deploy quickly to meet their connectivity needs. So the patterns are similar. >> Right, final question for you guys, I want to ask you to paint a picture of what success looks like. You don't have to name customers, you don't have to get in and reveal who they are, but what does success look like in multicloud as you paint a picture for the folks here and watching on the live stream, if someone says, "Hey I want to be multicloud, I got to to have my operations Agile, I want full DevOps, I want programmability and security built in from Day-zero." What does success look like? >> Yeah, I think success looks like this, so when you're building out a network, the network is a harder thing to change than some other aspects of cloud. So what we think is, even if you're thinking about that second cloud, which we have most of our customers are on two public clouds today, they might be dabbling in it. As you build that network foundation, that architecture, that takes in to consideration where you're going, and so once we start building that reference architecture out that shows, this is how to approach it from a multicloud perspective, not a single cloud, and let's not forget our branches, let's not forget our data centers, let's not forget how all this connects together because that's how we define multicloud, it's not just in the cloud, it's on-prem and it's off-prem. And so collectively, I think the key is also is that we provide them an HLD. You got to start with a high level design that can be tweaked as you go through the journey but you got to give it a solid structural foundation, and that networking which we think, most customers think as not the network engineers, but as an after thought. We want to make that the most critical element before you start the journey. >> George, from your seat, how does success look for you? >> So, you know it starts out on these journeys, often start out people not even thinking about what is going to happen, what their network needs are when they start their migration journey to the cloud. So I want, success to me looks like them being able to end up not worrying about what's happening in the network when they move to the cloud. >> Steve: Good point. >> Guys, great insight, thanks for coming on and sharing. How about a round of applause for the global system integrators? (Audience applauds) (Upbeat music) >> The next panel is the AVH certified engineers, also known as ACEs. This is the folks that are certified, they're engineering, they're building these new solutions. Please welcome Toby Foss from Informatica, Stacey Lanier from Teradata, and Jennifer Reed with Viqtor Davis to the stage. (upbeat music) (audience cheering) (panelists exchanging pleasantries) >> You got to show up. Where's your jacket Toby? (laughing) You get it done. I was just going to rib you guys and say, where's your jackets, and Jen's got the jacket on. Okay, good. >> Love the Aviatrix, ACEs Pilot gear there above the Clouds. Going to new heights. >> That's right. >> So guys Aviatrix aces, I love the name, think it's great, certified. This is all about getting things engineered. So there's a level of certification, I want to get into that. But first take us through the day in the life of an ACE, and just to point out, Stacy is a squad leader. So he's, he's like a-- >> Squadron Leader. >> Squadron Leader. >> Yeah. >> Squadron Leader, so he's got a bunch of ACEs underneath him, but share your perspective a day in the Life. Jennifer, we'll start with you. >> Sure, so I have actually a whole team that works for me both in the North America, both in the US and in Mexico. So I'm eagerly working to get them certified as well, so I can become a squad leader myself. But it's important because one of the critical gaps that we've found is people having the networking background because you graduate from college, and you have a lot of computer science background, you can program you've got Python, but networking in packets they just don't get. So, just taking them through all the processes that it's really necessary to understand when you're troubleshooting is really critical. Because you're going to get an issue where you need to figure out where exactly is that happening on the network, Is my issue just in the VPCs? Is it on the instance side is a security group, or is it going on prem? This is something actually embedded within Amazon itself? I mean, I troubleshot an issue for about six months going back and forth with Amazon, and it was the VGW VPN. Because they were auto scaling on two sides, and we ended up having to pull out the Cisco's, and put in Aviatrix so I could just say, " okay, it's fixed," and actually helped the application teams get to that and get it solved. But I'm taking a lot of junior people and getting them through that certification process, so they can understand and see the network, the way I see the network. I mean, look, I've been doing this for 25 years when I got out. When I went in the Marine Corps, that's what I did, and coming out, the network is still the network. But people don't get the same training they got in the 90s. >> Was just so easy, just write some software, and they were, takes care of itself. I know, it's pixie dust. >> I'll come back to that, I want to come back to that, the problem solved with Amazon, but Toby. >> I think the only thing I have to add to that is that it's always the network's fault. As long as I've been in networking, it's always been the network's fault. I'm even to this day, it's still the network's fault, and part of being a network guy is that you need to prove when it is and when it's not your fault. That means you need to know a little bit about 100 different things, to make that work. >> Now you got a full stack DevOps, you got to know a lot more times another hundred. >> Toby: And the times are changing, yeah. >> This year the Squadron Leader and get that right. What is the Squadron Leader firstly? Describe what it is. >> I think is probably just leading on the network components of it. But I think, from my perspective, when to think about what you asked them was, it's about no issues and no escalations. So of my day is like that, I'm happy to be a squadron leader. >> That is a good outcome, that's a good day. >> Yeah, sure, it is. >> Is there good days? You said you had a good day with Amazon? Jennifer, you mentioned the Amazon, and this brings up a good point, when you have these new waves come in, you have a lot of new things, new use cases. A lot of the finger pointing it's that guy's problem , that girl's problems, so how do you solve that, and how do you get the Young Guns up to speed? Is there training, is it this where the certification comes in? >> This is where the certifications really going to come in. I know when we got together at Reinvent, one of the questions that we had with Steve and the team was, what should our certification look like? Should we just be teaching about what AVH troubleshooting brings to bear, but what should that be like? I think Toby and I were like, No, no, no, no. That's going a little too high, we need to get really low because the better someone can get at actually understanding what's actually happening in the network, and where to actually troubleshoot the problem, how to step back each of those processes. Because without that, it's just a big black box, and they don't know. Because everything is abstracted, in Amazon and in Azure and in Google, is abstracted, and they have these virtual gateways, they have VPNs, that you just don't have the logs on, is you just don't know. So then what tools can you put in front of them of where they can look? Because there are full logs. Well, as long as they turned on the flow logs when they built it, and there's like, each one of those little things that well, if they'd had decided to do that, when they built it, it's there. But if you can come in later to really supplement that with training to actual troubleshoot, and do a packet capture here, as it's going through, then teaching them how to read that even. >> Yeah, Toby, we were talking before we came on up on stage about your career, you've been networking all your time, and then, you're now mentoring a lot of younger people. How is that going? Because the people who come in fresh they don't have all the old war stories, like they don't talk about it, There's never for, I walk in bare feet in the snow when I was your age, I mean, it's so easy now, right, they say. What's your take on how you train the young People. >> So I've noticed two things. One is that they are up to speed a lot faster in generalities of networking. They can tell you what a network is in high school level now, where I didn't learn that til midway through my career, and they're learning it faster, but they don't necessarily understand why it's that way here. Everybody thinks that it's always slash 24 for a subnet, and they don't understand why you can break it down smaller, why it's really necessary. So the ramp up speed is much faster for these guys that are coming in. But they don't understand why and they need some of that background knowledge to see where it's coming from, and why is it important, and that's old guys, that's where we thrive. >> Jennifer, you mentioned you got in from the Marines, it helps, but when you got into networking, what was it like then and compare it now? Because most like we heard earlier static versus dynamic Don't be static is like that. You just set the network, you got a perimeter. >> Yeah, no, there was no such thing. So back in the day, I mean, we had Banyan vines for email, and we had token ring, and I had to set up token ring networks and figure out why that didn't work. Because how many of things were actually sharing it. But then actually just cutting fiber and running fiber cables and dropping them over shelters to plug them in and all crap, they swung it too hard and shattered it and now I got to figure eight Polish this thing and actually should like to see if it works. I mean, that was the network , current cat five cables to run an Ethernet, and then from that I just said, network switches, dumb switches, like those were the most common ones you had. Then actually configuring routers and logging into a Cisco router and actually knowing how to configure that. It was funny because I had gone all the way up, I was the software product manager for a while. So I've gone all the way up the stack, and then two and a half, three years ago, I came across to work with Entity group that became Viqtor Davis. But we went to help one of our customers Avis, and it was like, okay, so we need to fix the network. Okay, I haven't done this in 20 years, but all right, let's get to it. Because it really fundamentally does not change. It's still the network. I mean, I've had people tell me, Well, when we go to containers, we will not have to worry about the network. And I'm like, yeah, you don't I do. >> And that's within programmability is a really interesting, so I think this brings up the certification. What are some of the new things that people should be aware of that come in with the Aviatrix A certification? What are some of the highlights? Can you guys share some of the highlights around the certifications? >> I think some of the importance is that it doesn't need to be vendor specific for network generality or basic networking knowledge, and instead of learning how Cisco does something, or how Palo Alto does something, We need to understand how and why it works as a basic model, and then understand how each vendor has gone about that problem and solved it in a general. That's true in multicloud as well. You can't learn how Cloud networking works without understanding how AWS and Azure and GCP are all slightly the same but slightly different, and some things work and some things don't. I think that's probably the number one take. >> I think having a certification across Clouds is really valuable because we heard the global s eyes as you have a business issues. What does it mean to do that? Is it code, is it networking? Is it configurations of the Aviatrix? what is, he says,the certification but, what is it about the multiCloud that makes it multi networking and multi vendor? >> The easy answer is yes, >> Yes is all of us. >> All of us. So you got to be in general what's good your hands and all You have to be. Right, it takes experience. Because every Cloud vendor has their own certification. Whether that's SOPs and advanced networking and event security, or whatever it might be, yeah, they can take the test, but they have no idea how to figure out what's wrong with that system. The same thing with any certification, but it's really getting your hands in there, and actually having to troubleshoot the problems, actually work the problem, and calm down. It's going to be okay. I mean, because I don't know how many calls I've been on or even had aviators join me on. It's like, okay, so everyone calm down, let's figure out what's happening. It's like, we've looked at that screen three times, looking at it again is not going to solve that problem, right. But at the same time, remaining calm but knowing that it really is, I'm getting a packet from here to go over here, it's not working, so what could be the problem? Actually stepping them through those scenarios, but that's like, you only get that by having to do it, and seeing it, and going through it, and then you get it. >> I have a question, so, I just see it. We started this program maybe six months ago, we're seeing a huge amount of interest. I mean, we're oversubscribed on all the training sessions. We've got people flying from around the country, even with Coronavirus, flying to go to Seattle to go to these events where we're subscribed, is that-- >> A good emerging leader would put there. >> Yeah. So, is that something that you see in your organizations? Are you recommending that to people? Do you see, I mean, I'm just, I guess I'm surprised or not surprised. But I'm really surprised by the demand if you would, of this MultiCloud network certification because there really isn't anything like that. Is that something you guys can comment on? Or do you see the same things in your organization? >> I see from my side, because we operate in a multiCloud environments that really helps and some beneficial for us. >> Yeah, true. I think I would add that networking guys have always needed to use certifications to prove that they know what they know. >> Right. >> It's not good enough to say, Yeah, I know IP addresses or I know how a network works. A couple little check marks or a little letters body writing helps give you validity. So even in our team, we can say, Hey, we're using these certifications to know that you know enough of the basics and enough of the understandings, that you have the tools necessary, right. >> I guess my final question for you guys is, why an ACE certification is relevant, and then second part is share with the live stream folks who aren't yet ACE certified or might want to jump in to be aviatrix certified engineers. Why is it important, so why is it relevant and why should someone want to be a certified aviatrix certified engineer? >> I think my views a little different. I think certification comes from proving that you have the knowledge, not proving that you get a certification to get an army there backwards. So when you've got the training and the understanding and you use that to prove and you can, like, grow your certification list with it, versus studying for a test to get a certification and have no understanding of it. >> Okay, so that who is the right person that look at this and say, I'm qualified, is it a network engineer, is it a DevOps person? What's your view, a little certain. >> I think Cloud is really the answer. It's the, as we talked like the edges getting eroded, so is the network definition getting eroded? We're getting more and more of some network, some DevOps, some security, lots and lots of security, because network is so involved in so many of them. That's just the next progression. >> Do you want to add something there? >> I would say expand that to more automation engineers, because we have those now, so I probably extend it beyond this one. >> Jennifer you want to? >> Well, I think the training classes themselves are helpful, especially the entry level ones for people who may be "Cloud architects" but have never done anything in networking for them to understand why we need those things to really work, whether or not they go through to eventually get a certification is something different. But I really think fundamentally understanding how these things work, it makes them a better architect, makes them better application developer. But even more so as you deploy more of your applications into the Cloud, really getting an understanding, even from people who have traditionally done Onprem networking, they can understand how that's going to work in Cloud. >> Well, I know we've got just under 30 seconds left. I want to get one more question then just one more, for the folks watching that are maybe younger than, that don't have that networking training. From your experiences each of you can answer why should they know about networking, what's the benefit? What's in it for them? Motivate them, share some insights of why they should go a little bit deeper in networking. Stacy, we'll start with you, we'll go then. >> I'll say it's probably fundamental, right? If you want to deliver solutions, networking is the very top. >> I would say if you, fundamental of an operating system running on a machine, how those machines start together is a fundamental changes, something that start from the base and work your way up. >> Jennifer? >> Right, well, I think it's a challenge. Because you've come from top down, now you're going to start looking from bottom up, and you want those different systems to cross-communicate, and say you've built something, and you're overlapping IP space, note that that doesn't happen. But how can I actually make that still operate without having to re IP re platform. Just like those challenges, like those younger developers or assistant engineers can really start to get their hands around and understand those complexities and bring that forward in their career. >> They get to know then how the pipes are working, and they're got to know it--it's the plumbing. >> That's right, >> They got to know how it works, and how to code it. >> That's right. >> Awesome, thank you guys for great insights, ACE Certified Engineers, also known as ACEs, give them a round of applause. (audience clapping) (upbeat music) >> Thank you, okay. All right, that concludes my portion. Thank you, Steve Thanks for having me. >> John, thank you very much, that was fantastic. Everybody round of applause for John Furrier. (audience applauding) Yeah, so great event, great event. I'm not going to take long, we got lunch outside for the people here, just a couple of things. Just to call the action, right? So we saw the ACEs, for those of you out of the stream here, become a certified, right, it's great for your career, it's great for not knowledge, is fantastic. It's not just an aviator's thing, it's going to teach you about Cloud networking, MultiCloud networking, with a little bit of aviatrix, exactly like the Cisco CCIE program was for IP network, that type of the thing, that's number one. Second thing is learning, right? So there's a link up there to join the community. Again like I started this, this is a community, this is the kickoff to this community, and it's a movement. So go to community.avh.com, starting a community of multiCloud. So get get trained, learn. I'd say the next thing is we're doing over 100 seminars across the United States and also starting into Europe soon, we will come out and we'll actually spend a couple hours and talk about architecture, and talk about those beginning things. For those of you on the livestream in here as well, we're coming to a city near you, go to one of those events, it's a great way to network with other people that are in the industry, as well as to start alone and get on that MultiCloud journey. Then I'd say the last thing is, we haven't talked a lot about what Aviatrix does here, and that's intentional. We want you leaving with wanting to know more, and schedule, get with us and schedule a multi hour architecture workshop session. So we sit down with customers, and we talk about where they're at in that journey, and more importantly, where they're going, and define that end state architecture from networking, computer, storage, everything. Everything you've heard today, everybody panel kept talking about architecture, talking about operations. Those are the types of things that we solve, we help you define that canonical architecture, that system architecture, that's yours. So many of our customers, they have three by five, plotted lucid charts, architecture drawings, and it's the customer name slash Aviatrix, network architecture, and they put it on their whiteboard. That's the most valuable thing they get from us. So this becomes their 20 year network architecture drawing that they don't do anything without talking to us and look at that architecture. That's what we do in these multi hour workshop sessions with customers, and that's super, super powerful. So if you're interested, definitely call us, and let's schedule that with our team. So anyway, I just want to thank everybody on the livestream. Thank everybody here. Hopefully it was it was very useful. I think it was, and Join the movement, and for those of you here, join us for lunch, and thank you very much. (audience applauding) (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
2020, brought to you by Aviatrix. Sit back and enjoy the ride. of the turbulent clouds beneath them. for the Aviation analogy, but, you know, Sherry and that basic infrastructure is the network. John: Okay, awesome, great speech there, I totally agree with everything you said of the innovations, so we got an hour and background before you got to Gartner? IT from a C programmer, in the 90, to a security So you rode the wave. Cloud-native's been discussed, but the Well, the way we see Enterprise adapting, I got to ask you, the aha moment is going So I have to have a mix of what I call, the Well, the solution is to start architecting What's your thoughts? like lot of people, you know, everyone I talk not a lot of application, that uses three enterprise, is I'm going to put the workload But the infrastructure, has to be able Do you agree with that? network part of the cloud, connectivity to and even the provisioning part is easy. What's difficult is that they choose the Its just the day to day operations, after Because that seems to be the hardest definition but I can create one on the spot. John: Do it. and the cloud EPI. to the cloud API. So the question is... of the cloud, to build networks but also to John: That's the Aviatrix plugin, right What are the legacy incumbent Well obviously, all the incumbents, like and Contrail is in the cloud. Cloud native you almost have to build it the T out of Cloud Native. That went super viral, you guys got T-shirts the architecture side and ruleing that. really is, "ACI in the cloud", you can't really an overlay network, across the cloud and start So, I got to ask you. How do you respond to that comment? them to start with, you can, if you're small These are some of the key discussions we've So if you move to the at the future of networking, you hear a couple connect to the cloud, its when you start troubleshooting So they have to What are some of the signal's that multiple cloud and they have to get wake up What are some of the day in the life scenarios. fast enough, I think that's what you want What's your advice? to bring my F5 in the Cloud, when you can Thank you. With Gartner, thank you for sharing. We get to hear the real scoop, we really decided to just bite the bullet and Guys on the other panelists here, there's that come up that you get to tackle. of the initial work has been with Amazon. How about you? but as the customer needed more resources I wanted you to lead this section. I think you guys agree the journey, it From architecture perspective, we started of the need for simplicity, the need for a I guess the other question I also had around that SD-WAN brought to the wound side, now So on the fourth generation, you is that when you think you finally figured You can't get off the ground if you don't I'd love to have you guys each individually tend to want to pull you into using their as possible so that I can focus on the things I don't know what else I can add to that. What are some of the things that you to us. The fact is that the cloud-native tools don't So the And I always say the of data as it moves to the cloud itself. What do you guys look at the of assurance that things are going to work And Louis, you guys got scripting, you an Aviatrix customer yet. Tell us, what are you thinking on the value, and you don't have to focus So I got to ask you guys. look at the API structure that the vendors going to sit with you for a day to configure So the key is that can you be operational I can almost see the challenge that you orchestration layer that allows you to-- So you expect a lot more stuff to becoming I do expect things to start maturing quite So the ability to identify I think the reality is that you may not What are some of the conversations that you the class to be able to communicate between are, the more, the easier it is to deploy. So, the Aviatrix tool will give you the beauty the network problem is still the same. cloud provider, then it's our job to make I agree, you just need to stay ahead of At the end of the day, you guys are just Welcome to stage. Thank you. Hey because that's at the end of the day you got Yeah, it seems impossible but if you are to be careful when I point a question to Justin, doing new products to the market, the need and the idea is that we were reinventing all the other panel, you can't change the network. you are going to build your networks. You said networking is the big problem how do you take your traditionally on premise We have to support these getting down to the network portion where in the same way. all the different regions through code. but the cloud has enabled us to move into But everything in the production of actually in the journey to cloud? that you typically are dealing with, with It started from a garage and 100% on the cloud. We heard from the last panel you don't know to transport data across and so if you do I loved what you said important to have that visibility, that you In the old days, Strongswan Openswan you So you actually can handle that When did you have the and that drove from the business side. are something that you have to take into account much more recent in the last six to eight Obviously, the bills are high to you can run your workloads with your network So the VPCs concept that it's third to market and so has seen on the cloud. all the routing protocols you can use. I'll ask that next but I got to ask you I So the application has to handle and the need to automation is much, much higher their network, then they have to cross the from the beginning, this architecture. Yeah, start from the base, have app to And so we always build it into that are trying to supply you guys with technology in and the network design will evolve and that you can become cloud native and really it's going to be done. It's naive being closed minded, native to looking to solve problems in this traditional the kind of jargon that you hear, that's the It's like 1.21 gigawatts are you out of your to me, I know they're full of baloney. Okay to 220, 221. Anytime I start seeing the cloud vendors I think if somebody explains to you are thanks for the great insight, great panel. for the digital event for the live feed. and down the stack, this has been the main So that's driving them to a multicloud is not called the cloud practice, it's the And so the way we do it, is we sit down, we I mean, they're proven practices, they work, take advantage of the scale and speed to deployment So do you guys see what I talked about? that internally and every one of our other know the answer to this, and a lawyer never the partnership that we're building and what What are some of the "of my problems that I had, the speed to integrate, already out there and ready to go that fit What do you guys think about all the multi-vendor that's the way we talk to customers is, "Let's that are emerging and the new brands emerging So our objective is to provide the solution John: And they all want multi-vendor, they All right, so I got to ask you guys a question I support this ongoing "and make it easy to next level of being able to enable customers are some of the engagements that you guys the methodology that we kind of go along the Yeah, I mean, I'm one of the guys that's So the patterns to ask you to paint a picture of what success out that shows, this is how to approach it journey to the cloud. the global system integrators? This is the folks that going to rib you guys and say, where's your Love the Aviatrix, ACEs Pilot gear there So guys Aviatrix aces, I love the name, a day in the Life. and see the network, the way I see the network. and they were, takes care of itself. back to that, the problem solved with Amazon, of being a network guy is that you need to Now you got a full stack DevOps, you got What is the Squadron Leader firstly? my perspective, when to think about what you lot of the finger pointing it's that guy's have VPNs, that you just don't have the logs Because the people who come that background knowledge to see where it's You just set the network, you got a the network , current cat five cables to run What are some of the and GCP are all slightly the same but slightly Is it configurations of the Aviatrix? got to be in general what's good your hands the country, even with Coronavirus, flying I'm really surprised by the demand if you I see from my side, because we operate to prove that they know what they know. these certifications to know that you know I guess my final question for you guys and you use that to prove and you can, like, Okay, so that who is the right person that so is the network definition getting eroded? engineers, because we have those now, so I you deploy more of your applications into each of you can answer why should they know is the very top. that start from the base and work your way start to get their hands around and understand They get to know then how the pipes are They got to know how it works, and how Awesome, thank you guys for great insights, All right, that concludes and Join the movement, and for those of you
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David Shinnick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Derrick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Justin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Mullaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jennifer Reed | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Toby Foss | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aviatrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Frank Cabri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Justin Brodley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjay Poonen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Simon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Justin Smith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jennifer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George Buckman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amit Utreja | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stacy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bobby Willoughby | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jess | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stacey Lanier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sherry Wei | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NSX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Derrick Monahan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mexico | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Simon Richard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Seattle | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: Cyber Security Update: What to Expect at RSA 2020
>> From the SiliconANGLE Media office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's the cube. Now, here's your host, Dave Vellante. >> Hello everyone and welcome to this week's Wikibon cube insights powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis ahead of the RSA conference, we want to update you on the cyber security sector. This year's event is underlined by coronavirus fears, IBM has pulled out of the event and cited the epidemic as the reason and it's also brings to the front the sale of RSA by Dell to STG partners and private equity firm. Now in our last security drill down, we cited several mega trends in the security sector. These included the ever escalating sophistication of the attacker, the increased risk from the data economy, the expanded attack surface with the huge number of IP addresses that are that are exploding out there, and the lack of skills and the number of cyber tools that are coming to the market. Now, as you know, in these segments, we'd like to share insights from the cube. And I want you to listen to two American statesman and what they said, on The Cube. Here's general Keith Alexander, who's the former director of the NSA, along with Dr. Robert Gates, who's the former director of the CIA and former Secretary of Defense, play the clip. >> When you think about threats, you think about nation states, so you can go to Iran, Russia, China, North Korea, and then you think about criminal threats, and all the things like ransomware. Some of the nation state actors are also criminals at night, so they can use nation state tools and my concern about all the evolution of cyber threats is that the attacks are getting more destructive. >> I think cyber and the risks associated with cyber, and IT need to be a regular part of every board's agenda. >> So you hear General Alexander really underscore the danger, as well, Dr. Gates is articulating what we've said many times on the cube that cyber security is a board level agenda item. Now, the comments from both of these individuals represent what I would consider tailwinds for cyber technology companies. Now we're going to drill into some of those today. But it's not all frictionless. There are headwinds to in this market space, cloud migration, the shift from north south south to East West network traffic, its pressure traditional appliance based perimeter security solutions, increase complexity and lack of skills and other macro factors, including questions on ROI. CFO saying, hey, we spend all this cash, why aren't we more secure? Now, I want you to hear from two chief information security officers officers on both the challenges that they face and how they're dealing with them. Roll the clip. >> Lack of talent, I mean, we're starving for talent. Cybersecurity is the only field in the world with negative unemployment. We just don't have the actual bodies to actually fill the gaps that we have and in that lack of talent Cecil's are starving. >> I think that the public cloud offers us a really interesting opportunity to reinvent security right. So if you think about all of the technologies and processes and many of which are manual over the years, I think we have an opportunity to leverage automation to make our work easier in some ways. >> Now I featured Brian Lozada and Katie Jenkins before and breaking analysis segments, and you can hear it from the cyber leaders, we lack the talent, and cloud computing and automation are areas we're pursuing. So this challenges security companies to respond. But at the end of the day, companies have no no choice. In other words, organizations buying security solutions, the sophistication of the attacker is very high and the answer to my CFO and ROI is fear based. If you don't do this, you might lose billions in market cap. Now, I want you to take a listen to these cubilam talking about the attacker of sophistication and the importance of communication skills in order to fund cyber initiatives, really to keep up with the bad guys, please play the clip. >> The adversary is talented and they're patient, they're well funded okay, that's that's where it starts. And so, you know why why bring an interpreter to a host when there's already one there right? Why write all this complicated software distribution when I can just use yours. And so that's that's where the play the game starts. And and the most advanced threats aren't leaving footprints because the footprints already there, you know, they'll get on a machine and behaviorally they'll check the cash to see what's hot. And what's hot in the cash means that behaviorally, it's a fast they can go they're not cutting a new trail most of the time, right? So living off the land is not only the tools that they're using the automation, your automation they're using against you, but it's also behavioral. >> That's why the most the most important talent or skill that a security professional needs is communication skills. If you can't articulate technical risk into a business risk to fund your program, it's, you know, it's very hard for you to actually be successful in security. >> Now, the really insidious thing about what TK Keanini just said is the attackers are living off the land, meaning they're using your tools and your behaviors to sneak around your data unnoticed. And so as Brian Lozada said, as a security Pro, you need to be a great communicator in order to get the funding that you need to compete with the bad guys. Which brings me to the RSA conference. This is why you as a security practitioner attend, you want to learn more, you want to obtain new skills, you want to bring back ideas to the organization. Now one of the things I did to prepare for this segment is to read the RSA conference content agenda, which was co authored by Britta Glade and I read numerous blogs and articles about what to expect at the event and from all that I put together this word cloud, which conveys some of the key themes that I would expect you're going to hear at the shows. Look at skills jump right out, just like Brian was saying, the human element is going to be a big deal this year. IoT and the IT OT schism, everyone's talking about the Olympics, and seeing that as a watershed event for cyber, how to apply machine learning and AI is a big theme, as is cloud with containers and server less. phishing, zero trust and frameworks, framework for privacy, frameworks for governance and compliance, the 2020 election and weaponizing social media with deep fakes, and expect to hear a lot about the challenges of securing 5G networks, open source risks, supply chain risks, and of course, the need for automation. And it's no surprise there's going to be a lot of talk about cyber technology, the products and of course, the companies that sell them. So let's get into the market and unpack some of the ETR spending data and drill into some of these companies. The first chart I want to show you is spending on cyber relative to other initiatives. What this chart shows is the spending on cyber security highlighted in the green in relation to other sectors in the ETR taxonomy. Notice the blue dot. It shows the change in spending expected in 2020 versus 2019. Now, two points here. First, is that despite the top of my narrative that we always hear, the reality is that other initiatives compete for budget and you just can't keep throwing cash at the security problem. As I've said before, we spend like .014% percent of our global GDP on cyber, so we barely scratched the surface. The second point is there's there's there's a solid year on year growth quite high at 12% for a sector that's estimated at 100 to 150 billion dollars worldwide, according to many sources. Now let's take a look at some of the players in this space, who are going to be presenting at the RSA conference. You might remember to my 2020 predictions in that breaking analysis I focused on two ETR metrics, Net Score, which is a measure of spending velocity and Market Share, which measures pervasiveness in the data set. And I anointed nine security players as four star players. These were Microsoft, Cisco, Palo Alto Networks, Splunk, Proofpoint, Fortinet, Oka, Cyber Ark and CrowdStrike. What we're showing here is an update of that data with the January survey data. My four star companies were defined as those in the cyber security sector that demonstrate in both net scores or spending momentum, that's the left hand chart and market share or pervasiveness on the right hand chart. Within the top 22 companies, why did I pick 22? Well, seemed like a solid number and it fit nicely in the screen and allowed more folks. So a few takeaways here. One is that there are a lot of cyber security companies in the green from the standpoint of net score. Number two is that Fortinet and Cisco fell off the four star list because of their net scores. While still holding reasonably well, they dropped somewhat. Also, some other companies like Verona's and Vera code and Carbon Black jumped up on the net score rankings, but Cisco and Fortinet are still showing some strength in the market overall, I'ma talk about that. Cisco security businesses up 9% in the quarter, and Fortinet is breaking away from Palo Alto Networks from a valuation perspective, which I'm going to drill into a bit. So we're going to give Cisco and Fortinet two stars this survey period. But look at Zscaler. They made the cut this time their net score or spending momentum jumped from 38% last quarter to nearly 45% in the January survey, with a sizable shared in at 123. So we've added Zscaler to the four star list, they have momentum, and we're going to continue to watch that quarterly horse race. Now, I'd be remiss if I didn't point out that Microsoft continues to get stronger and stronger in many sectors including cyber. So that's something to really pay attention to. Okay, I want to talk about the valuations a bit. Valuations of cyber security space are really interesting and for reasons we've discussed before the market's hot right now, some people think it's overvalued, but I think the space is going to continue to perform quite well, relative to other areas and tech. Why do I say that? Because cyber continues to be a big priority for organizations, the software and annual recurring revenue contribution ARR continues to grow, M&A is going to continue to be robust in my view, which is going to fuel valuations. So Let's look at some of the public companies within cyber. What I've compiled in this chart is eight public companies that were cited as four star or two star firms, as I defined earlier, now ranked this by market value. In the columns, we show the market cap and trailing 12 month revenue in billions, the revenue multiple and the annual revenue growth. And I've highlighted Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet because I want to drill into those two firms, as there's a valuation divergence going on between those two names, and I'll come back to that in just a minute. But first, I want to make a few points about this data. Number one is there's definitely a proportional relationship between the growth rate and the revenue multiple or premium being paid for these companies. Generally growth ranges between one and a half to three times the revenue multiple being paid. CrowdStrike for example has a 39 x revenue multiple and is growing at 110%, so they're at the high end of that range with a growth at 2.8 times their revenue multiple today. Second, and related, as you can see a wide range of revenue multiples based on these growth rates with CrowdStrike, Okta and now Zscaler as the standouts in this regard. And I have to call at Splunk as well. They're both large, and they have high growth, although they are moving beyond, you know, security, they're going into adjacencies and big data analytics, but you you have to love the performance of Splunk. The third point is this is a lucrative market. You have several companies with valuations in the double digit billions, and many with multi billion dollar market values. Cyber chaos means cash for many of these companies, and, of course for their investors. Now, Palo Alto throw some of these ratios out of whack, ie, why the lower revenue multiple with that type of growth, and it's because they've had some execution issues lately. And this annual growth rate is really not the best reflection of the stock price today. That's really being driven by quarterly growth rates and less robust management guidance. So why don't we look into that a bit. What this chart shows is the one year relative stock prices of Palo Alto Networks in the blue and compared to Fortinet in the red. Look at the divergence in the two stocks, look at they traded in a range and then you saw the split when Palo Alto missed its quarter last year. So let me share what I think is happening. First, Palo Alto has been a very solid performance since an IPO in 2012. It's delivered more than four Rex returns to shareholders over that period. Now, what they're trying to do is cloud proof their business. They're trying to transition more to an AR model, and rely less on appliance centric firewalls, and firewalls are core part of the business and that has underperformed expectations lately. And you just take Legacy Tech and Cloud Wash and Cloud native competitors like Zscaler are taking advantage of this and setting the narrative there. Now Palo Alto Network has also had some very tough compares in 2019 relative to 2018, that should somewhat abate this year. Also, Palo Alto has said some execution issues during this transition, especially related to sales and sales incentives and aligning that with this new world of cloud. And finally, Palo Alto was in the process of digesting some acquisitions like Twistlock, PureSec and some others over the past year, and that could be a distraction. Fortinet on the other hand, is benefiting from a large portfolio refresh is capitalizing on the momentum that that's bringing, in fact, all the companies I listed you know, they may be undervalued despite, of all the company sorry that I listed Fortinet may be undervalued despite the drop off from the four star list that I mentioned earlier. Fortinet is one of those companies with a large solution set that can cover a lot of market space. And where Fortinet faces similar headwinds as Palo Alto, it seems to be executing better on the cloud transition. Now the last thing I want to share on this topic is some data from the ETR regression testing. What ETR does is their data scientists run regression models and fit a linear equation to determine whether Wall Street earnings consensus estimates are consistent with the ETR spending data, they started trying to line those up and see what the divergence is. What this chart shows is the results of that regression analysis for both Fortinet and Palo Alto. And you can see the ETR spending data suggests that both companies could outperform somewhat expectations. Now, I wouldn't run and buy the stock based on this data as there's a lot more to the story, but let's watch the earnings and see how this plays out. All right, I want to make a few comments about the sale of the RSA asset. EMC bought RSA for around the same number, roughly $2 billion that SDG is paying Dell. So I'm obviously not impressed with the return that RSA has delivered since 2006. The interesting takeaway is that Dell is choosing liquidity over the RSA cyber security asset. So it says to me that their ability to pay down debt is much more important to Dell and their go forward plan. Remember, for every $5 billion that Dell pays down in gross debt, it dropped 25 cents to EPS. This is important for Dell to get back to investment grade debt, which will further lower its cost. It's a lever that Dell can turn. Now and also in thinking about this, it's interesting that VMware, which the member is acquiring security assets like crazy and most recently purchased carbon black, and they're building out a Security Division, they obviously didn't paw on the table fighting to roll RSA into that division. You know maybe they did in the financial value of the cash to Dell was greater than the value of the RSA customers, the RSA product portfolio and of course, the RSA conference. But my guess is Gelsinger and VMware didn't want the legacy tech. Gelsinger said many times that security is broken, it's his mission to fix it or die trying. So I would bet that he and VMware didn't see RSA as a path to fixing security, it's more likely that they saw it as a non strategic shrinking asset that they didn't want any part of. Now for the record, and I'm even won't bother showing you the the data but RSA and the ETR data set is an unimpressive player in cyber security, their market share or pervasiveness is middle of the pack, so it's okay but their net score spending velocities in the red, and it's in the bottom 20th percentile of the data set. But it is a known brand, certainly within cyber. It's got a great conference and it's been it's probably better that a PE company owns them than being a misfit toy inside of Dell. All right, it's time to summarize, as we've been stressing in our breaking analysis segments and on the cube, the adversaries are very capable. And we should expect continued escalation. Venture capital is going to keep pouring into startups and that's going to lead to more fragmentation. But the market is going to remain right for M&A With valuations on the rise. The battle continues for best of breed tools from upstarts like CrowdStrike and Okta and Zscaler versus sweets from big players like Cisco, Palo Alto Networks and Fortinet. Growth is going to continue to drive valuations. And so let's keep our eyes on the cloud, remains disruptive and for some provides momentum for others provides friction. Security practitioners will continue to be well paid because there's a skill shortage and that's not going away despite the push toward automation. Got in talk about machine intelligence but AI and ML those tools, there are two edged sword as bad actors are leveraging installed infrastructure, both tools and behaviors to so called live off the land, upping the stakes in the arms race. Okay, this is Dave Vellante for Wikibon's CUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching this breaking analysis. Remember, these episodes are all available as podcasted Spotfire or wherever you listen. Connect with me at david.vellante at siliconangle.com, or comment on my LinkedIn. I'm @dvellante on Twitter. Thanks for watching everybody. We'll see you next time. (upbeat music).
SUMMARY :
Massachusetts, it's the cube. and the lack of skills and the number of cyber tools and all the things like ransomware. and IT need to be a regular part Now, the comments from both of these individuals represent We just don't have the actual bodies to actually fill and many of which are manual over the years, and the answer to my CFO and ROI is fear based. And and the most advanced threats to actually be successful in security. highlighted in the green in relation to other sectors
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Keith Alexander | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Fortinet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brian Lozada | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Legacy Tech | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Oka | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NSA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2012 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
January | DATE | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Katie Jenkins | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Proofpoint | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gates | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two firms | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
25 cents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Olympics | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Britta Glade | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2.8 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two stocks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cyber Ark | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
38% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SDG | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two names | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Robert Gates | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two star | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
M&A | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
110% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
three times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2006 | DATE | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two points | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zscaler | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cloud Wash | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: re:Invent 2019: AWS Gears up for Cloud 2.0
>> From the SiliconANGLE Media office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE. Now here's your host, Dave Vellante. >> Hello everyone and welcome to this week's episode of theCUBE insights, powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we're going deep into AWS. In a couple of weeks, theCUBE is going to be at the eighth AWS Reinvent, which will be our seventh year of having theCUBE at that show. You know, reinvent has really become the Super Bowl for enterprise tech innovation. And, ahead of the event, what I want to do is talk about the revolution of cloud, and the impact that it's having on the industry. And of course, I want to dig in to some of the data using the ETR data set. Before I do that, let me first say that the cloud 2.0, which is a term that we've been using, is becoming a reality. This is something that John Furrier and I talk about a lot here at theCUBE and at SiliconANGLE. The cloud is not about an incremental transition, it's really about transformation. We're talking here about the end to end modernization of the enterprise. The game is changing, and the engine of innovation is really being driven by new architectures, and these architectures have built around a few items. Data, machine intelligence, and of course cloud, for scale. We feel like what we are witnessing is the build out of this massively scalable distributed system. And this system is transforming businesses, and really enabling entire new companies and business models to emerge. The cloud is the under pitting of this digital revolution, and virtually every industry is going to be disrupted, no industry is safe. All right, let's get right to it. So, the key questions that I want to explore in this session, let's start with the spending patterns. We're going to look at the ETR survey data, and what services are attracting the most action inside cloud, and which vendors are winning? I then want to look at the market share data from a couple of angles. I'll look at ETR data, I'll talk about some other market data. Then we're going to drill into some of the services that are critical to innovation, and I specifically want to look at databases in particular analytic data stores. And then I want to look at the data and analytic services at AI, machine intelligence, and then I want to look at the data around containers and functions, like Lambda, which are very hot right now. Then, we're going to share some data on how the cloud is impacting the so called, "old guard." This is a pejorative term that Andy Jassy coined to refer to the legacy enterprise tech providers. Then I want to make some comments about the AWS ecosystem, it's getting a lot of chatter lately. And then I want to share some thoughts on what you can expect this year at Reinvent, and then I'll wrap. So the first data point that I want to show you here really draws on ETR's latest survey of 1,336 respondents. So what this chart does is it cuts the data, and it's showing just the cloud sector ranked by net score. Now remember, net score is a measure of spending momentum. Okay? So you can see where the action is. So at the top, you see Azure Functions and AWS Lambda popping right up. Look at their net scores, they've got a net score of 74% and 71% respectively. You can see Azure overall, this is the overall Azure business that's right up there as well, and of course AWS overall, so people responded AWS is right there. Very, very high, but it's dropped a little bit below Azure. We'll talk about that more in a moment. Then you can see VMware Cloud on AWS, it's got strong momentum, which is a real positive. You've got Google Cloud Functions, again, Functions very hot right now. Open Shift from Red Hat, GCP is up there, VMware Cloud. Then you've got Alibaba. Alibaba's only got 18 mentions, whereas the others have much higher shared in, so I'm not going to really put too much weight on that. And you can see the other folks as well on that chart. But also you can you can point out the functions. The Azure functions, and services like Lander, Lambda, are gaining really a lot of momentum in the marketplace, and I think point to a new mode of compute. What I want to do now is I want to isolate in this chart, the big 3 in cloud, and put them into context with a legacy player, you know, namely IBM. I'm not trying to pick on the legacy guys, but I think it's good for context. So as you can see here, Azure and AWS, they've been neck and neck battling it out in the last 10 surveys or so. And you can see even Google, somewhat behind, but it's still got pretty strong spending momentum. Now, these figures overall are trending down relative to the expectations earlier in the year. This is something that we've talked about, that spending is reverting back to pre '18 levels, not falling off a cliff, still solid in the grand scheme of things. So you can see, you know, net scores here are well above 50% for AWS and Azure. Now take a look at IBM. The ETR data shows them in the red zone, with a net score of 16%. That is not a surprise, that they're behind the Big 3. And I've said many many times, here's the thing, IBM and Oracle, I'm not showing Oracle here, they're at least in the cloud game. Think about it, HP had the public cloud, they had to tap out. Cisco, they don't have a public cloud. Dell EMC, even VMware, they don't have a public cloud. So at least IBM and Oracle have a cloud play, where they can take their SaaS business and run it, and get vertically integrated and some operating leverage. Okay, I'm going to switch gears a little bit and talk about market share. And we want to focus here on the battle between Azure and AWS. We all know Microsoft is growing faster, but AWS is much larger. And this is something that AWS CEO Andy Jassy, he takes a lot of time to explain to the analyst, and to the crowd at Reinvent. Let's take a look at what Jassy said last year at Reinvent on this topic, and then we'll come back. >> So if you look at the provider who most people think is the second place provider in this space, in their last financials they grew 76% year over year. And you can look at that and say, "Oh, 76% is more than 46%." But if you look at it in reality, that 76% represents about a billion dollars of growth year over year. If you look at the 46% growth of AWS on that much larger base, that represents $2.1 billion of growth year over year. So more than double that. So AWS not only has a significant market segment leadership position in share, but also on an absolute revenue basis is growing meaningfully faster than anybody else. >> Okay so, think about what Jassy said. He was using Q3 data and he said that AWS had a $27 billion run rate business. And if you look at those charts that I showed, or he showed, it looked like the yellow bar, which was Microsoft, even though they didn't say, you know, "the company that shall not be named." It was about 1/3 the size of AWS, so where would that put Microsoft? Somewhere around 9 billion last year, on kind of an apples to apples run rate basis, using those extrapolated market data that Jassy showed. By the way, ironically, this is about what AWS did last quarter which you can see here on this chart that I'm showing you. You might remember, I showed you this chart in a previous episode of Breaking Analysis. And what it shows is AWS' quarterly revenue on the blue bars, and the growth rate on the right hand axis, that's the red line. And you can see Jassy talked about 46% growth.. And you can see that in Q3 last year, and then look how its moderated. It's 35% in Q3 in 2019, the last quarter that they announced. So Jassy is right. AWS is growing slower than Microsoft last year, which was growing in the mid-70's. But Microsoft was 59% last quarter so that trend is continued. If, you know, that's if you believe Microsoft numbers, which are really not clean. It's hard to say sometimes with all the SaaS in there, and Office 365, LinkedIn, I don't know what else is in there but we try to parse that out. Regardless, Jassy's point that size matters is still correct. But, Microsoft is closing the gap. I talked to the Wikibon team recently, and they think that AWS is going to come in at $35 billion dollars in revenue this year. And they have Microsoft's IS business at around $15 billion. So that's 43% of AWS's business versus 33% at this time last year. So you can see that Microsoft is closing that gap. AWS is still adding $8 billion a year in growth, but Microsoft is definitely catching up. So what is the spending data show? Let's take a look here at the ETR data, and see what they say about market share. Now, remember, in the ETR parlance market share is a measure of how pervasive a vendor is within the data set. And as you can see here, it maps pretty well to the market estimates that I was just talking about. Although it actually appears that in these lines that AWS is widening that lead. But you can see in the net scores, by the way, this is net scores across all sectors, not just cloud computing, so it pulls in the other segments. But none the less, you can see Azure has a somewhat higher net score which indicates stronger spending intentions. So that pretty much fits what we see in the market for the most part. Now it's not all rosy for Microsoft. You know, they are super strong in the ETR data set across the board, but specifically in cloud. So that's important, I don't want to lose sight of that, but I want to share something that Gartner said recently, and it's a 2019 magic quadrant on cloud computing. Microsoft Azure's reliability issues continue to be a challenge for customers, largely as a result of Azure's growing pains. Since September of 2018, Azure has had multiple service-impacting incidents, including significant outages involving Azure active directory. The nature of many of these outages is such that customers had no controls in order to mitigate the downtime. So, caution is what Gartner said. So despite the great numbers and the fact that Azure is gaining, it's having growing pains. For years I've talked about the economies of scale for AWS due to its automation. I talked about the companies marginal economics at volume, and you can see it in the firm's operating margins. The question to ask, is Microsoft running into dis-economies at scale, due to it's large install base, and does it have technical debt? Because it's jamming large software estate into Azure, and having to preserve the past while trying to innovate for the future. I don't know, and it's hard to tell because Microsoft is so big and so profitable, but it's something that CIO's definitely should keep an eye on. Now, I want to look at some key sectors here and evaluate how AWS is doing in some of the areas where we see really innovation. And I want to start in the all important data base area. Now I'm going to focus here on analytic databases, and data warehouses, and I think there's some interesting trends going on here. So this is a cut of the ETR data warehouse segment. Now I've talked about Snowflake in the previous episodes of Breaking Analysis, and you can see why. Snowflake has a net score of 71%. They're one of the highest and most interesting newer companies in this space and in the ETR data set. You can see AWS doing very well, and I want to make some comments on both Snowflake and AWS Redshift. But before I do that, look at Oracle and Teradata on this chart. What you see here is the classic innovator's dilemma. It's at play where AWS and Snowflake, you can see them, they're solidly in the green, and you got the two legacy players affirmly in the red. So I include them as reference points. But I want to come back to Redshift and Snowflake, because I feel like there's something new going on in cloud. Where cloud 1.0 was all about IS and compute and storage and throw in some data base, there's this new trend emerging that's really driving new workloads. And this data that now sits in the cloud, it's maybe stored in S3, and customers are using data stores like Redshift and Snowflake to get more insights out of that data. They're bringing tools like data bricks into the equation, and really driving a whole new set of work loads that are not just about provisioning infrastructure, but really extracting insights much more quickly from the data and applying it to your business. And for AWS, it's driving tons of compute sales and customers are getting more value out of their data. Now, here's the interesting thing. Redshift and Snowflake are both best in class modern data warehouses, they seem to be coexisting, they're both thriving, you know, why is that? They're both MPP columnar stores, so they've got many similar attributes, but I think what it comes down to really is what I call horses for courses. I don't have time to dig into it today, but when you peel back the onion, what you find is different approaches to things like architecture, security, scaling, different philosophies, pricing, different feature sets. So it really comes down to the best strategic fit, and for now it looks like to me, there's room for both platforms. They're both doing very well from a spending momentum perspective. We'll see how that plays out over time. Let's now take a look at the analytic sector. Now here, we're talking about things like Amazon's quarry services, elastic map reduce, search kinesis, quick site glue, streaming, those kinds of tooling. You can see in this chart that AWS is very strong and it leads Microsoft by a small margin in the ETR data set. Now for comparison, and again, I'm not trying to pick on the legacy players, but I think it's important to provide context, and when it comes to spending momentum, the data doesn't lie. You can see here, IBM they've had a sizeable and very impressive set of capabilities in the analytic space, but you can see where the buyers are placing their bets. Now, what I'm showing you now in this next chart is a similar view, but this time I'm showing ETR market share for both AI and the machine learning segment. So for context I've added IBM Watson. Remember, market share for ETR is a measure of pervasiveness, not only to AWS and Microsoft, though they're battling it out for the top spot, but they got stronger spending momentum as you can see by the net scores. Look at Watson, I mean, it's respectable in the ETR data, but it just doesn't have the scale of the top two players. Okay, finally, I want to look at the container space. It's hot and I want to focus on Lambda from AWS. So what we're showing here is the net scores for Lambda, and Amazon's elastic container service. And you can see Lambda, very very strong. ECS is tapering a little bit, it's showing less momentum overtime, but still well over 50% net score. But look at Pivotal Cloud Foundry, they've showed a steady down term over time. This underscores the work that VMware and Pat Gelsinger have to do with one of their newest acquisitions. As in aside, this is an opportunity for VMware, which in my opinion, I've said they really need to get their developer act together, really to drive new innovation. And by the way, Pivotal just had some layoffs, but my understanding that it was not in engineering but rather folks that VMware saw as redundant, rolls that they already had in place. The bottom line is, Pivotal has been steadily losing momentum in the ETR surveys. But look, a 27 net score is not a disaster by any means. I said on my last Breaking Analysis, that if I were Michael Dell, I'd dedicate a thousand engineers to open sources, using Pivotal to really appeal to developers, and make his hardware run better on the open source tooling and apps that these thousand build. And make his infrastructure programmable. This is how the edge is going to be won. It's not going to be by throwing boxes over the top of the fence, but really a bottoms up by devs. I digress. The last data point that I want to share here is really designed to address the question, how is the cloud impacting what Jassy calls the "old guard?" So this view shows market share, which again is defined by ETR, remember they do the math to measure the pervasiveness of a vendor in their data set. And they call that market share. And I've cut that data by just the cloud spenders. So those buyers spending heavily, and I've isolated on AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. And how their spending on traditional vendors has changed overtime. And I'm picking out Cisco, HPE, Dell EMC, and Oracle. And the story you can see is clear. They came out of the downturn in 2010, and the big guys who were holding their breath, and they came up for air and they saw lots of pet up demands, so they did pretty well. But the cloud has continued to slowly eat away at their share, and their spending momentum as seen by the net scores in this table, has been affected. But look at Cisco. They actually have quite a strong net score, its 37%. So to me, by the way, this makes sense. And I think Cisco is in a good position to connect clouds and secure data moving across clouds. But the cloud, it's long steady march continues. And we are entering a new era that I think is only going to see greater share gains for the cloud in my view. By the way, I don't want to just, back to my rant about the edge in programmable infrastructure, and how developers are going to win the edge. Cisco with Devnet is actually in a pretty good position here, and done a good job. And I think they're one of the few, if not the only legacy player that is going to figure this out. Now before I close, I want to make a few comments on the ecosystem, and give a glimpse as to what to expect at Reinvent in 2019. All right first the ecosystem. There's a lot of sort of chatter, and griping, and concerns around AWS cannibalizing the ecosystem partners. And I think frankly, that concern has merit. You know when AWS has this insane customer focus, you can pretty much take that to the bank. If a customer wants something and expresses that to AWS, and they see a space to fill where it can leverage that flywheel that they always talk about at ad services, AWS is not going to sub optimize it's portfolio to protect it's partner. It's going to go hard after it. So as a partner of AWS, it's up to you to keep innovating and moving fast. And that's hard, because AWS is probably moving faster than you are. But you know, you can still specialize as a partner, and thrive as a best debride player. I mean, look at the Snowflake example. There's plenty of opportunities out there in security, backup, governess, machine intelligence, work flow, edge, and of course, there's the infamous multi cloud opportunity. And I saw infamous because AWS doesn't use that term, you're not going to see it on the floor of Reinvent this year because it's frankly not allowed. AWS is very controlling over the messaging that it puts out to it's customers, and that includes the rules of the ecosystem if you want to go to their show. But you'll hear plenty of side conversations about multi cloud, and we're certainly going to be talking about it on theCUBE. Is multi cloud a symptom of multi vendor? You know what I think on this topic. I think it's more than that than it is a strategy. But CIO's are now being asked to clean up the multi cloud mess, so it does have merit. But it creates complexity, and that means opportunity for partners. So multi cloud is white space for the ecosystem, as is hybrid, and on prim connectivity, so partners are hedging their bet, they're supporting multiple clouds, and they're partnering with Azure and Google, and that makes sense to do so. But here's the thing. Cloud 2.0 is getting more complex. AI, new workloads, edge, new use cases, machine learning, more API's, more services, more complicated pricing. These are confusing matters for customers, and partners can help simplify this. As well, thinking about competition with Microsoft, Microsoft is kind of an easy choice. If you're already a Microsoft software customer, (murmurs) So partners need AWS, and AWS need partners to help them deliver solutions to go to market, and keep it simple. John Furrier says this a lot, that winning in the enterprise requires salesmanship, and AWS partners, they're a powerful channel, so AWS has to lean on this channel to really create solutions for customers and simplify. Okay, let's talk about what to expect at Reinvent 2019, and I want to start with storage. Jeff Bar put out a blog post announcing a series of new storage offers around block store, new gateways, S3 replication, a new Windows file server capabilities, and stronger emphasis on file storage. Now, most of the world's data is stored on file, and AWS is expanding it's portfolio. It started with S3 object, back in 2006, and then EBS, block store, and now a big emphasis on file services. So I expect to hear a lot about that, and as well, we're going to hear about outpost. What progress has Amazon made with outpost? What's the status? What's the vision for outpost? How does it fit in at the edge? You know as I just said in my rant earlier, the edge is all about developers, and I like AWS' edge approach. I think AWS has the right perspective. It's very devs centric. It's bottoms up from devs, not over the top like many of the box sellers. Now at Reinvent, you're probably going to hear more about unplugging Oracle databases, certainly security is going to be a big focus, as will AI and machine learning. I also expect a lot on transformation of industries. As Microsoft continues to grow in IS, expect AWS to somehow try to change the game again. And I'm not sure AWS can win the battle head on with CIO's. Rather, I think AWS is really going to focus on this duel disruption agenda, both within the horizontal technology stack but also within industries. In other words, expect AWS to increasingly focus on enabling industry transformation in different segments, like media, health care, financial services, manufacturing, government, automobiles, telco, virtually every vertical. This dual disruption agenda, both in the tech stack and within industries, its in AWS's DNA because it's in Amazon's DNA. It's driven by Jeff Bezos at the top. Now in closing, I want to stress again, the cloud 2.0 is here, and it's getting more complex. The so called "old guard" is hanging on to it's install basis, but in many ways, it's working hard to get simpler. Now are these two domains going to collide together and create an equilibrium in the cloud native wannabes and the cloud native guys? Probably not functionally, but there are a lot of opportunities for the big whales to capitalize on this industry consolidation, and compete by simplifying their experience enough to keep customers hanging around. You know, don't forget, the enterprise business for years has relied on high touch specials, and unique requirements, and that's the wheelhouse for the legacy players, it's not AWS'. And maybe this approach is going to continue to pick away at those opportunities with repeatable and automatible solutions. So this should be really interesting to watch. Stop by theCUBE, come see us at Reinvent, we got two sets there. This is Dave Vellante, signing out from this episode of CUBE insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
From the SiliconANGLE Media office in So the first data point that I want to show you here And you can look at that and say, And the story you can see is clear.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$2.1 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS' | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2006 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bar | PERSON | 0.99+ |
76% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
37% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
18 mentions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
September of 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
$27 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jason Maynard, Oracle Netsuite | Boomi World 2019
>>Live from Washington, D C it's the cube covering Boomi world 19 how to bide booming. >>Welcome to the cube at Lisa Martin at Boomi world 19 in Washington DC and with John furrier and John and I are pleased to welcome to the cube Jason Maynard, the SVP of global field operations from NetSuite. Jason, welcome. Thanks for having me. It's great to be in D C and on the cube. It is. We were just talking about baseball, so we'll have to park that for a second and talk about some other sexy stuff besides baseball, ERP. So nets we, I saw you on stage this morning. You guys have been a partner of the first Alliance partner with Boomi for about 12 years. Thousands of joint customers. candy.com is one of them. Yep. They're going to be on later today. So I'm excited to have my afternoon sugar rush. Make sure he brings a big bag. You got it. So talk to us about you guys. We're also, I noticed Boomie's 2019 Alliance partner of the year. Lots of innovations going on. Give our audience a little bit of an overview of what NetSuite is doing with Boomi. >>Great. So Boomi is, has been one of our longest partners. I said I think we, we first inked the partnership in 2007 so it goes back 12, 13 years. Um, we, we, when we sell ERP, you always end up having to connect to a legacy on prem system, right? Or you may have to connect to new marketplaces to sell and so there's always need for integration. And so from day one, Boomi wanted to really kind of push the envelope work with cloud players. You know, when we started NetSuite 20 years ago, it was kinda crazy to put business applications on the internet and they'd been there from day one with us really on this journey. And so they've been a great partner to sort of help all those customers migrate and move their business to the cloud. >> You guys had success with Boomi on the customer front. >>Can you unpack that a little bit? Because the customer equation around data is interesting. You guys have turned this into an opportunity with nets. We talk about how that works. Yeah, I mean look EV every customer needs to get more insight out of their data. And you know, the ERP system is one of the major hubs in any organization, right? You've got a handful of system of records, right? And core financials is one of the main systems of record and inevitably every customer will have probably 1520 legacy data sources, right? That are going to be necessary for an ERP. And so for us, working with Boomi across not just the U S but across the globe with a lot of different international customers, it's a natural fit because we're not obviously going to be connecting with all of the systems that they're touching today. It brings a lot more value of data into NetSuite, which obviously then helps our customer out. >>So you guys were at, you said an early partner of Boomi back in 2007 when they were founded. We got to speak with Rick Nucci yesterday. So one of the interesting things that we talk about, and John even pointed out yesterday is you know, they took a big bet, Boomi dead way back then with building this architecture that's pretty unique to this day. This single instance, multi-tenant cloud application. Take us back to, because obviously NetSuite's been around longer, you a lot of choice, there are more iPods vendors out there. What is it about the way that Boomi is architected that is enabling your customers to achieve so much success but also really that you buy saw back in Oh seven I think this is something that's going to be a real big opportunity for NetSuite. >>You know, it's, it's, it's been an interesting ride because if you go back even to Oh seven and didn't even maybe eight or nine years ago, it was not a foregone conclusion with a lot of technology vendors that the world was going to shift to the cloud. Yeah, right. There were a lot of server huggers out there. There still are. They still want to hug this, they still want to hug the machine. Right. And so it's important, I think that we work with partners who have the same true North in terms of where we think that the technology is going. And I think that alignment, which is, you know, we're 100% in the cloud, always have been, always will be. Boomi shared that vision early on. So it was easier to make a bet then right, with a vendor who was going to have that commitment. >>And so that's been, to their credit, the vision that they've had for obviously years now. And I think that's what's helped them grow so quickly. And one of the things that you observed obviously is that the customers have choices, but the world software's changing, right? I mean cloud has changed the software development life cycle. I mean just in the past decade alone, the business of change, you still going to have the system of records. Okay. But with containers and Kubernetes and some of these cloud native opportunities, there's more flexibility in how people are deploying legacy and or core apps. Yeah. So they're not getting thrown away as everyone had predicted. So, I mean, there was some funded saying, well, everyone's going to move to the cloud and not really. Yeah, well I look at it, it's a good point because there's no packaged applications. They're not the entirety of the application market as you know. >>Right? Custom application development will never go away. You will always have, you know, things that are custom. People build apps on NetSuite, right? Things that are very close to ERP you'll build on the NetSuite platform. But there are things that are not, you know, native to our platform that need to connect to NetSuite. And there are customers that we share who are, have legacy COBOL applications for example. Right? And they may need to put a wrapper around that and get certain forms into NetSuite. So it really does run the gamut. And so it'll never be one thing, right? We just sort of, in the technology industry, we never go from, you know, 100 to zero in terms of what's deployed in the legacy. We sort of layer in compost technology. And I think that's what's happening. And so, you know, we'll replace certain systems. We go in and we pretty much always replace a an on prem system but there are a lot of on-prem technologies that a will never, never go away. >> I was digging around about Boomi and you guys net suite looking at some of the use cases. One thing that caught my eye was, you know, the growth startup for instance, might be born in the cloud. Yup. Never have an it department. Um, they have kind of a um, hacked together system of record at HR and ERP kind of things, but at some point they've got to grow and they hit a growth spurt and they just become rapid growth. Eventually goes public. You guys have had good success with Boomi in these kinds of startups. It's pretty normal. You've seen this before. Can you talk about that dynamic because at some point people got to start establishing formal, is this the systems applications? You're gonna need payroll, you're gonna need HR. I mean this is blocking and tackling. You guys have been successful there. >> Well, you know, we, we like to think about we can be the first system that you'll ever need and hopefully we'll be the last system that you'll ever need. Right? And what ends up happening is we've architected NetSuite to let you start small and then add more functionality as you grow. So you may start with just basic financials. You may add order management, move into full fledged ERP, maybe you're going to use our HR system down the road. And so we kind of, we kind of stairway a customer through their journey. Boomi does the same thing. Maybe you start with two connectors, right? You're just connecting two basic applications and, and that's sweet. And then you evolve into something more sophisticated, right? Where as you saw today and some of the technology demos where, you know, they're tapping into all sorts of different systems that are not even ERP or CRM, it's, you know, IOT and just all sorts of different insights that they can bring from the different technologies. >>Better together message is legit and this works. Yeah. You know, we look at, technology is all about coopertition these days, right? Is every vendor, right? In some way we overlap, you know, Boomie's owned by Dell, NetSuite's owned by Oracle, right? We're, we're all sort of inner inner locked in one way or another. But ultimately we have to work together because we share so many customers and so customers don't have the patience and nor should they for any of the sort of the, the vendor warfare. And I think that's the cool thing that's evolved with technology standards. It's easy for us to work together and we have to do it and we want to do it because it's what's the right thing for the customer. >>Let's talk about net suite as a launching pad for a lot of tech IPOs in the last few years. Give us your perspectives on what you guys started to recognize as a lot of these tech companies have kind of, that's why it just seems to me like net suite has been this sort of launchpad for that. Talk to us about what you've achieved there. >>Yeah, no, it's, we're, we're really humbled by the fact that more companies go, Poe tech companies go public on NetSuite than frankly you need any other ERP system. Um, you know, we help invent the industry. Early on, 20 years ago, Evan Goldberg and Larry had the famous four minute phone call to, you know, kind of crazily idea to put business apps on the web. Um, and so we've been, you know, at the forefront of this, but it's not just technology. It's, you know, we, we're a subscription business right from day one. Like we didn't sell a license with maintenance. We sold a subscription. So I think a lot of customers look at us and say, okay, they've been through the journey that we have. You know, we went public 12 years ago, you know, we past $1 billion in sales, you know, we got acquired. So the journey that we've been on, most of our customers are going to be on that journey in one form or another. >>We're going to, we've made acquisitions. Our customers make acquisitions, right? So we tried it and this was sort of the genius of what Evan and the team built is a system that can handle any business model. So whether you're selling time as a service, whether you're selling time or you're selling a subscription, you're selling a widget, maybe you're going to sell a widget as a service in the future. We can kind of handle any of the business models and most of the IPS are innovative companies that innovate not just with what they sell, but in how they sell it. >> Show about some stories from the field that you've seen out there. Anecdotally, share some turn situation. What are customers going through right now? Enterprises as they go through their journeys, they realize cloud's there. They got some stuff on premise is going to keep there. >>There's obviously certain reasons you're gonna run payroll in the cloud. You're going to have to have multitenancy is allows it news cases and clouds, not that straightforward. When you start thinking about having an enterprise and the hybrid mode of operations, what are some of the customers feeling? What's a, what's the mindset? What's their architecture look like? What are some of the examples? Can you share? Yeah. You know, I'd say three things come to mind. So first off, it's this business model innovation, right? The, the on prem systems tend to lock you into a model, right? And there's nothing, and when they were built, they were innovative 1520, 30 years ago. Most companies, business models have outgrown that legacy system. So they need to move off that to enable some new thing that they want to do. So that's a big driver. I think the other thing is, is globalization is here to stay. >>Um, you know, whether you're in the United States or you're in the UK or you're in Asia, right? We're one interconnected global economy. And so you may, you know, source from Asia, you may design in California, you may do nearshore assembly in Mexico and then you do omni-channel distribution. So you have to be global. And I would say the thing that's changed in the last 10 years is companies are being global from day one. It's not just something you add on five, seven, eight years down the road. You see companies designed for being global. And that I think those two things, business model, innovation global are our big catalyst right now. I mean we had, Oh one more thing real quick. So we have a Cuba alumni set on the cube data's the new software. Yeah. So if you've got a global business, data's critical as the data needs to be acted upon, you've got policy, you got regulations, regulatory issues, personal privacy stuff, company policy. >>As you have this global layer of data, making it available, addressable across multiple systems is a huge task. What's your view on that? Well it's, it's, it's an interesting question cause we think of it and kind of three pillars. It's we give you visibility, we give you control and then we give you the agility, right? So you've got to, first off, you've got to have visibility into the data, right? You need to know what's happening. Like how much did we sell in the Australian subsidiary yesterday, right? You need to have controls. If your CFO, you need to have global financial controls. You may have sold a lot in Australia. You've got to make sure you're spending too much. Right? How do you manage that? And then ultimately the agility is how do you make a decision on that? Right. And so that's those three things I think all play into it. >>And how does the consumerization effect impact it? Visibility, control, agility. Because as consumers we have this expectation whether you know in our personal lives we can get anything that we want within a couple of clicks. So when you're talking to a tech, whether it's a young tech company or even not a tech company like candy.com which is seems like a mixture. You and I were talking before of a number of different industries, all, all in one. How does, has NetSuite evolved to enable that consumer to go from their personal life to being able to interact with ERP next, struck the value from it in the ways that they want? Anywhere, anytime. >>Let's, let's be honest, for a second, ERP kinda got a dirty reputation. You know, in the nineties nobody loved their ERP implementations. Books had been written on this, right? ERP was like, it was like going like a bad trip to the dentist office in the 90s and that was sort of the catalyst for our company. But that's not enough just to be in the cloud. It's you have to make your user experience consumer grade, right? We always talk about enterprise grade. It's all the, reliability, scalability, all that kind of stuff. That's sort of a given, like you have to do that, but I think you have to, you have to adopt the consumer grade. So we spent a lot of time and we're doing a lot more and we're going to be rolling out some new stuff around user interface and just how easy is it to have a dashboard on your phone so that you can run your business from your smartphone versus actually having to be tethered to the desktop because we're all mobile, we're all traveling. You're a business owner, you're a CFO, you're CEO. You need to be connected. Maybe you're too connected. Maybe that's part, maybe we have screen-time problems. We do business. If we, if we can give our customers Screentime addiction to watch their business in real time, I guess that's a good thing. Right? And so we want to be able to make sure that they can have all that insight at their fingertips, whether they're in the office or at the beach. >>And speaking of insight, talk to us about brain yard. What that is, why you developed it and what it's enabling. >>Yeah. Thank you. That's like my, I was hoping you were gonna ask me. It's my secret, but not so secret anymore. Pet project. So one of the things being in the cloud, we have 18,000 customers, right? We have a single instance of NetSuite and so we've had the unique seat at the table to see all of these different companies grow in all these different industries. We evolved into selling by industry. So we have a retail version of software version of manufacturing, nonprofit, 1213 different industries. What we had in that is we had all these insights by industry. What is the right DSO number for a software company, right? What is the thing that a nonprofit needs to look at? And so we had trapped inside of NetSuite, all these brains sitting in all this information and PowerPoint and word docs and just everywhere. And so we decided to crack the hood open and literally open source that information and put it on the website. >>And so there's a subtle message here is that we have to do more than just sell bits. We, we're ultimately selling customer success or a business outcome, whatever you want to call it. So we need to transfer that knowledge to our customers so they can run their business better. So it's our investment back into the customer saying, Hey, you know what, if you're a software company and your DSO is at this level, you know, best in class is actually, you know, five days lower on a day sale, outstanding. How do you get your business to close that gap? And that's where we can really add value comms. People love comparables and best practices. You're essentially taking that heavy lifting work. It's giving it up there. It's benchmarking, it's analysis. You know, I was a former wall street analyst, so this one's near and dear to my heart, which is comparison, you know, how is this company doing versus that company? >>And so we have lots of data, um, that we've gleaned over the years. Lots of insights. So we kind of know what those best practices are. This is just the first phase of what we're doing. We're working with a lot of partners across the industry to give us some of their industry data so we kind of mash it up and come up with the insights. So it wasn't as an analyst, I'd love to get your thoughts real quick and take the, take the net suite hat off, put your industry participants hat on. Lot of wall street challenges around we worked, pulled their IPO, their GP gross profit was down. Other SAS businesses have huge margins. Their successful zooms public. There's a new formula developing in this cloud 2.0 world software world where the dynamic between classic software and software economics in the cloud are changing. What's your thoughts on this? >>If a startups out there and growing companies that are really looking to crack the code by at all costs and then monetize, get the margins that would, what's your, what's your analysis? No, it's, I, this is an area that I think a lot of companies raise too much, too much capital. Right? And they, we've been in this very unique environment over the last kind of eight or nine years where I'd argue a lot of startups who've been overfunded and when you have overfunding you chase growth at really no, you know, at without any limit on terms of the cost and what you see as you sort of distort the reality of what's happening in the business. And so I would argue that we've had, you know, zero in basically free money in terms of access to capital and we've lost track of some of the basics that you need to build a profitable, sustainable business. >>So, you know, when I was working on wall street, you couldn't go public, you know, if you were within say four quarters of cashflow break even, right? Those are some of the things that we used to have. But you've seen, you know, business fundamentals. Yeah, I need, and so what's happening right now? It's just a little bit of her. I think it's mean reversion. Honestly. I think you're seeing, you know, the public markets, you know, if you will veto some of the frothiness that's been in the private markets. And so this is, I think companies, some marketplaces do. That's what they, that's there. It's fantastic. It's a self correcting mechanism, right? I mean it's, you know, just cause you marked up your last round when you were private to a good Jillian dollars doesn't mean that the buy side on, you know, the pension fund is going to want to pay that and we work so you can't be high and run a business. You know, as we were saying, you know, trying, you know, God bless them, they're trying, but it's probably not the best practice I would not have. I would not recommend that. It's not a good look for wall street. How a good luck, you know, you can get on the Joe Rogan show there, knock yourself out. If you're a Ilan, you can do it. But you know, he's the, he's the only one we're going to let, don't know. >>Probably shouldn't be publicly. Air's too much unless you want something to laugh at and you know what, in this economy, I think we all need that. Jason, thank you for sharing with us what you're doing at NetSuite with Boomi, the insights that you guys are opening up with brain yard. So from brain yard, let's go back to the other yard that I promised. The baseball yard, your Dodger fan giants fan. Hats off. You guys are there. We are not. So I will say good luck to your team. We appreciate your time and what can I say, Bri? I'll give it to ya. All right, well it's been a pleasure talking to you and thank you for your time. Thanks for John furrier. I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the cube from booby world 19 thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
Live from Washington, D C it's the cube covering So talk to us about you guys. And so they've been a great partner to sort of help all You guys had success with Boomi And you know, the ERP system is one of the major hubs in any organization, things that we talk about, and John even pointed out yesterday is you know, they took a big And I think that alignment, which is, you know, we're 100% in the cloud, always have been, And one of the things that you observed obviously is that we never go from, you know, 100 to zero in terms of what's deployed in the legacy. One thing that caught my eye was, you know, And what ends up happening is we've architected NetSuite to let you start small you know, Boomie's owned by Dell, NetSuite's owned by Oracle, right? Talk to us about what you've achieved there. Evan Goldberg and Larry had the famous four minute phone call to, you know, kind of crazily idea So we tried it and this was sort of the genius Show about some stories from the field that you've seen out there. tend to lock you into a model, right? And so you may, you know, we give you control and then we give you the agility, right? Because as consumers we have this expectation whether you know in our personal It's you have to make your user experience consumer grade, What that is, why you developed it and what And so we decided to crack the hood open and literally open source that information and put it on the website. you know what, if you're a software company and your DSO is at this level, you know, best in class is actually, And so we have lots of data, um, that we've gleaned over the years. really no, you know, at without any limit on terms of the cost and what you see as you sort of distort as we were saying, you know, trying, you know, God bless them, they're trying, but it's probably not the the insights that you guys are opening up with brain yard.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jason Maynard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jason | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mexico | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Larry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rick Nucci | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Washington DC | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Evan Goldberg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
18,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
NetSuite | TITLE | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1520 | DATE | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Evan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first phase | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Washington, D C | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ilan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boomi | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
five days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boomie | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
candy.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
about 12 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$1 billion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
NetSuite | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first system | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
nine years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
1213 different industries | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Boomi | PERSON | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two connectors | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Oracle Netsuite | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Joe Rogan | PERSON | 0.97+ |
30 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
eight years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
eight | DATE | 0.97+ |
1520 legacy data sources | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Thousands of joint customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
90s | DATE | 0.97+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
Cuba | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two basic applications | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Bri | PERSON | 0.95+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.95+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
booby world | TITLE | 0.94+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
D C | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
Breaking Analysis: Dell Technologies Financial Meeting Takeaways
>> From the SiliconANGLE Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE! Now here's your host, Dave Vellante. >> Hi, everybody, welcome to this Cube Insights, powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis I want to talk to you about what I learned this week at Dell Technology's financial analyst meeting in New York. They gathered all the financial analysts, Rob Williams hosted it, he's the head of IR, Michael Dell of course was there. They had Dennis Hoffman who is the head of strategic planning, Jeff Clarke who basically runs the business and Tom Sweet, of course, who was the star of the show, the CFO, all the analysts want to see him. Dell laid out its longterm goals, it provided much clearer understanding of its strategic direction, basically focused on three areas. Dell believes that IT is getting more complex, we know that, they want to capitalize on that by simplifying IT. We'll talk about that. And then they want to position for the wave of digital transformations that are coming and they also believe, Dell believes, that it can capitalize on the consolidation trend, consolidating vendors, so I'll talk about each of those. And so let me bring up the first slide, Alex, if you would. The takeaways from the Dell financial analyst meeting. Let me share with you the overall framework that Tom Sweet laid out. And I have to say, the messaging was very consistent, these guys were very well-prepared. I think Dell is, from a management perspective, very well-run company. They're targeting three to 5% growth on what they're saying is a 4% GDP forecast. Or sorry, 4%, I have GDP here, it's really 4% industry growth. GDP's a little lower than that obviously. So this is IDC data, Gartner data, 4% industry growth. So that's an error on my part, I apologize. The strategies to grow relative to their competition. So grow share on a relative basis. So whatever the market does, again, not GDP, but whatever the market does, Dell wants to grow faster than the market. So it wants to gain share, that's its primary metric. From there they want to grow operating income and they want to grow that faster than revenue, that's going to throw off cash. And then they're going to also continue to delever the balance sheet. I think they paid down 17 billion in debt since the EMC acquisition. They want to get to a two X debt to EBITA ratio within 18 months. And what they're saying is, you know, they talked about, Tom Sweet talked about this consistent march toward investment-grade rating. They've been talkin' about that for awhile. He made the comment, we don't need to have a triple A rating but we want to get to the point where we can reduce our interest expense, and that will, 'cause they'll drop right into the bottom line. So they talked about these various levers that they can turn, some of them under the P and L, gaining share, some are their operating structure and their organizational structure, and one big one is obviously their debt structure. The other key issue here is will this cut the liquidity discount that Dell faces? What do I mean by that? Well, VMware has about a $60 billion valuation. Dell owns about 80% of VMware, which would equate to 48 billion. But if you look at Dell's market cap, it's only 37 billion. So it essentially says that Dell's core business is worth minus 11 billion. We used to talk about this when EMC owned VMware. Its core business only comprised about 40% of the overall value of the company, in this case because of the high debt, Dell has a negative value. And it's not just the high debt. Michael Dell has control over the voting shares, it's essentially a conglomerate structure, there's very high debt, and it's a relatively low margin business, notwithstanding VMware. And so as a result, Dell trades at a discount relative to what you would think it should trade at, given its prominence in the market, $92 billion company, the leader in every category under the sun. So that's the big question is can Dell turn these levers, drop EBITA or cash to the bottom line, affect operating income, and then ultimately pay down its debt and affect that discount that it trades at? Okay, bring up, if you would, Alex, the next slide. Now I want to share with you the takeaways from the Dell line of business focus. This really was Jeff Clarke's presentations that I'm going to draw from. Servers, we know, they're softer demand, but the key there is they're really faced tough compares. Last year, Dell's server business grew like crazy. So this year the comparisons are lessened. But there's less spending on servers. I'll share with you some of the ETR data. Storage, they call it holding serve, you saw last quarter I did an analysis, I took the ETR data and the income statement, it showed Pure was gaining share at like 22% growth from the income statement standpoint. Dell was 0% growth but is actually growing faster than its competitors. With the exception of Pure. It's growing faster than the market. So Dell actually gained share with 0% growth. Dell's really focused on consolidating the portfolio. They've cut the portfolio down from 80, I think actually the right number is 88 products, down to 20 by May of 2020. They've got some new mid-range coming, they've just refreshed their data protection portfolio, so again, by May of next year, by Dell Technologies World they'll have a much, much more simplified portfolio. And they're gaining back share. They've refocused on the storage business. You might recall after the acquisition, EMC was kind of a mess. It was losing share before the acquisition, it was so distracted with all the Elliott Management stuff goin' on. And kind of took its eye off the ball, and then after the acquisition it took awhile for them to get their act together. They gained back about 375 basis points in the last 18 months. Remember a basis point is 1/100th of 1%. So gaining share and their consistent focus on trying to do that. Their PC business, which is actually doin' quite well, is focused on the commercial segment and focused on higher margins. They made the statement that the PCs are kind of undersupply right now so it's helping margins. There's a big focus in Jeff Clarke's organization on VMware integration. To me this makes a lot of sense. To the extent that you can take the VMware platform and make Dell hardware run VMware better, that's something that is an advantage for Dell, obviously. And at the same time, VMware has to walk the fine line with the ecosystem. But certainly it's earned the presence in the market now that it can basically do what I just said, tightly integrate with Dell and at the same time serve the ecosystem, 'cause frankly, the ecosystem has no choice. It must serve VMware customers. The strategy, essentially, is to, as I say, capitalize on vendor consolidation, leverage value across the portfolio, so whether it's pivotal, VMware integration, the security portfolio, try to leverage that and then differentiate with scale. And Dell really has the number one supply chain in the tech business. Something that Dave Donatelli at HP, when he was at HP, used to talk about. HPE doesn't really talk about that supply chain advantage anymore 'cause essentially it doesn't have it. Dell does. So Jeff Clarke's reorganization, he came in, he streamlined the organization, really from the focus on R and D to product to collaboration across the organization and the VMware integration. I actually was quite impressed with when I first met Jeff Clarke I guess two years ago now, what he and the organization have accomplished since then. No BS kind of person. And you can see it's starting to take effect. So we'll keep an eye on that. The next slide I want to show you, I want to bring in the ETR data. We've been sharing with you the ETR spending intention surveys for the last couple of weeks and months. ETR, enterprise technology research, they have a data platform that comprises 4,500 practitioners that share spending data with them. CIOs, IT managers, et cetera. What I'm showing here is a cut off of the server sector. So I'm going to drill down into server and storage. So these are spending intentions from the July survey asking about the second half of 2019 relative to the first half of 2019. And this is a drill-down into the giant public and private firms. Why do I do that? Because in meeting the ETR, this is the best indicator. So it's big, big public companies and big private companies. Think Uber. Private companies that spend a ton of dough on IT. UPS before it went public, for example. So those companies are in here. And they're, according to ETR, the best indicators. What this chart shows, so the bars show, and I've shared this with you a number of times, the lime green is we're adding, we're new to this platform, we're new adoption. The evergreen is we're spending more, the gray is we're spending the same, the light red or pink is we're spending less, and the dark red is we're leaving the platform. So if you subtract the red from the green you get what's called a net score, and that's that blue line. And this is the overall server spending intentions from that July survey. The end is about 525 respondents out of the 4,500. And this is, again, those that just answered the question on server. So you can see the net score on server spend is dropping. And you can see the market share on server is dropping. The takeaway here is that servers, as a percentage of overall IT spend, are on a downward slope, and have been for quite some time. Back to the January '16 survey. Okay, so that's going to serve us. Let's take a look at the same data for storage. So if, Alex, if you bring up the storage sector slide, You can see kind of a similar trend. And I would argue what's happening here, a couple of things. You've got the CLOB effect, I'll talk about that some more, and you've also got, in this case, the flash, all-flash array effect. What happened was you had all-flash arrays and flash come into the data center, and that gave performance a huge headroom. Remember, spinning disk was the last bastion of mechanical movement and it was the main bottleneck in terms of overall application performance. IO was the problem. Well you put a bunch of flash into the system and it gives a lot of headroom. People used to over-provision capacity just for performance reasons. So flash has had the effect of customers saying, hey, my performance is good, I don't need to over-provision anymore, I don't need to buy so much. So that combined with cloud, I think, has put down the pressure on the storage business as well. Now the next slide, Alex, that I want you to bring up is the vendor net scores, the server spending intentions. And what I've done is I've highlighted Dell EMC. Now what's happening here in the slide, and I realize it's an eye chart, but basically where you want to be in this chart is in the left-hand side. What it shows is the spending intentions and the momentum from the October '18, which is the gray, the April '19, which is the blue, and then the July '19 which is the most recent one. Again, the end is 525 in the servers for the July '19 survey. And you can see Dell's kind of in the middle of the pack. You'd love to be in the left-hand side, you know, Docker, Microsoft, VMware, Intel, Ubuntu. And you don't want to be on the right-hand side, you know, Fujitsu, IBM, is sort of below the line. Dell's kind of in the middle there, Dell EMC. The next slide I want to show you is that same slide for storage. And again, you can see here is that on-- So this is vendor net scores, the storage spending intentions. On the left-hand side it's all the high growth companies. Rubrik, Cohesity, Nutanix, Pure, VMware with vSAN, Veeam. You see Dell EMC's VxRail. On the right-hand side, you see the guys that are losing momentum. Veritas, Iron Mountain, Barracuda, HitachiHDS, Fusion-io still comes up in the survey after the acquisition by Western Digital. Again, you see Dell EMC kind of holding serve in the middle there. Not great, not bad. Okay, so that's kind of just some other ETR data that I wanted to share. All right, next thing we're going to talk about is the macros market summary. And Alex, I've got some bullet points on this, so if you bring up that slide, let me talk about that a little bit. So five points here. First, cloud continues to eat away at on-prem, despite all this talk about repatriation, which I know does happen. People try to throw everything to the cloud and they go, whoa! Look at my Amazon bill, yeah, I get that. That's at the margin. The main trend is that cloud continues to grow. That whole repatriation thing is not moving the on-prem market. On-prem is kind of steady eddy. Storage is still working through that AFA injection. Got a lot of headroom from performance standpoint. So people don't need to buy as much as they used to because you had that step function in performance. Now eventually the market will catch up, all this digital transformation is happening, all this data is flowing through the system and it will catch up, and the storage market is elastic. As NAN prices fall, people will, I predict, will buy more storage. But there's been somewhat of a lull in the overall storage market. It's not a great market right now, frankly, at the macro level. Now ETR does these surveys on a quarterly basis. They're just about to release the October survey, and they put out a little glimpse on Friday about this survey. And I'll share some bullet points there. Overall IT spending clearly is softening. We kind of know that, everybody kind of realizes that. Here's the nuance. New adoptions are reverting to pre-2018 levels, and the replacements are rising. What does this mean? So the number of respondents that said, oh yes, we're adopting this platform for the first time is declining, and the replacements are actually accelerating. Why is that? Well I was at ETR last week and we were talking about this and one of the theories, and I think it's a good one, is that 2016, 2017 was kind of experimentation around digital transformation. 2018, people started to put things into production or closer to production, they were running systems in parallel, and now they're making their bets, they're saying, hey, this test worked, let's put this heavy into production in 2019, and now we're going to start replacing. So we're not going to adopt as much stuff 'cause we're not doing as much experimentation. We're going to now focus and narrow in on those things that are going to drive our business, and we're going to replace those things that aren't going to drive our business. We're going to start unplugging them. So that's some of what's happening. Another big trend is Microsoft. Microsoft is extending its presence throughout. They're goin' after collaboration, you saw the impact that they had on Slack and Slack stock recently. So Slack Box, Dropbox, are kind of exposed there. They're goin' after security, they've just announced a SIM product. So Splunk and IBM, they're kind of goin' after that base. The application performance management vendors. For instance, New Relic. Microsoft goin' after them. Obviously they got a huge presence in cloud. Their Windows 10 cycle is a little slower this time around, but they've got other businesses that are really starting to click. So Microsoft is one of the few vendors that really is showing accelerated spending momentum in the ETR data. Financial services and telcos, which are always leading spender indicators, are actually very weak right now. That's having a spillover effect into Europe, which is over-banked, if I can use that term. Banking heavy, if you will. So right now it's not a pretty picture, but it's not a disaster. I don't want to necessarily suggest this as like going back to 2007, 2008, it's not. It's really just a matter of things are softening and it's, you know, maybe taking a little breath. Okay, so let me summarize the meeting overall. Again, it was a very well-run meeting. Started at 9:00, ended at 12:00, bagged lunch, go home. Nice and crisp. So these guys are very well-prepared. I think, again, Dell is a extremely well-managed company. They laid out a much clearer vision for Wall Street of its strategy, where it's headed. As they say, they're going after IT complexity. I want to make a comment on this. You think about Legacy EMC. Legacy EMC was not the company that you would expect to deal with complexity. In fact, they were the culprit of complexity. One of the things that Jeff Clarke did when he came in, he said, this portfolio's too complex, needs to be simplified. Joe Tucci used to say, overlap is better than gaps. Jeff Clarke said we got too much overlap. We don't have a lot of gaps so let's streamline that portfolio. Taking advantage of vendor consolidation, this is an interesting one. Ever since I've been in this business, which has been quite a long time now, I've been hearing that buyers want to consolidate the number of vendors that they have. They've really not succeeded in doing that. Now can they do that now 'cause there are less vendors? Well, in a sense, yes, there are less sort of on-prem big vendors. EMC's no longer in the market, you don't have companies like Sun and Digital anymore, Compact is gone. HP split in two, but still. You're not seeing a huge number of new vendors, at scale, come into the market. Except you've got AWS and Google as new players there. So I think that injects sort of a new dynamic that a lot of people like to put cloud aside and kind of ignore it and talk about the old on-prem business, but I think that you're going to see a lot of experimentations and workload ins and outs, particularly with AWS and Google and of course Azure, which is in itself, their cloud is almost a separate force. So we'll see how that shakes up. As I say, servers right now, Dell's got a very tough compare. I think Dell will be fine in the server space. Storage, it's all about simplifying the portfolio, they've got a refreshed portfolio focused on regaining share. They've rebranded everything Power, so their whole line is going to be Power by, if it's not already, by May of next year, Dell Technologies World. It's a much more scalable portfolio. And I think Dell's got a lot of valuation levers. They're a $92 billion company, they've got their current operations, their current P and L, their share gains, their cross-company synergies, particularly with VMware, they can expand their TAM into cloud with partnerships like they're doing with AWS and others, Google, Microsoft. The Edge is a TAM expansion opportunity to them. And also corporate structure. You've seen them. VMware acquired Pivotal. They're cleaning that up. I'm sure they could potentially make some other moves. Secureworks is out there, for example. Maybe they'll do some things with RSA. So they got that knob to turn and they can delever. Paying down the debt to the extent that they can get back to investment grade, that will lower their interest rates, that'll drop right to the bottom line, and they'll be able to reinvest that. And Tom Sweet said, within 18 months, we'll be able to get there with that two X ratio relative to EBITA, and that's when they're going to start having conversations with the rating agencies to talk about you know, hey, maybe we can get a better rating and lower our interest expense. Bottom line, did Wall Street buy the story? Yes. But I don't think it's going to necessarily change anything in the near term. This is a show me from Missouri, prove it, execute, and then I think Dell will get rewarded. Okay, so this is Dave Vellante, thanks for watching this Cube Insights powered by ETR. We'll see ya next time. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
From the SiliconANGLE Media Office And at the same time, VMware has to walk the fine line
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff Clarke | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Williams | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Sweet | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fujitsu | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Dave Donatelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Western Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Alex | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
October '18 | DATE | 0.99+ |
4,500 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
April '19 | DATE | 0.99+ |
4,500 practitioners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Legacy EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
17 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$92 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sun | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July '19 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
July | DATE | 0.99+ |
Joe Tucci | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Iron Mountain | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Veritas | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
HitachiHDS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dropbox | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
88 products | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tom Barsi, Carbon Black | VMworld 2019
>> Live from San Francisco, celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage, it's the cube. Covering VMWorld 2019 Brought to you by VMware and it's ecosystem partners. >> It is 10 years and going strong for the cube coverage here at Vmworld, Vmworld 2019, we were here 10 years back, and looking forward to the next 10 or more. We're at Moscone Center North San Francisco, the cube with Dave Vellante, John Walls. We're joined now by Tom Barsi, who is the senior vice president, business development at Carbon Black Inc. Tom kind of required couple of weeks for you not much really going on in all serious.. >> Tom: Just a little bit (laughs) >> Yeah I mean big purchase VMware, I'm sure you're aware pick up Carbon Black making that announcement official this week. You were in the center of that, that discussion so if you would kind of give us a little behind the scenes peek, behind the curtain if you will of how those talks developed and really back to your relationship with VMware to begin with. >> Tom: Yeah >> Cause this goes back for a while. >> Tom: Needless to say a super, a super exciting week and accomodation of a lot of work amongst a army of people to get us to where we are and obviously announcement last week, around the acquisition of Carbon Black was huge but I think the announcement this week in terms of going into more detail that Sanjay and Pat went to in terms of combining the best infrastructure management with our best app reek cloud, native, modern, security platform with analytics combine that together, I think there is really an opportunity to transform the industry and currently we've been working with VMware for well over 2 years. So 2 years ago Vmworld we announced an exclusive partnership with VM where we integrated with Vmwares newly announced app defense product, which is really around securing cloud workloads, obviously their in a unique position to secure workloads because of where they sit, leveraging the infrastructure and knowing what's good and what should be running within those workloads so they've leveraged that and build app defense and for the first time we built that integration, exclusive integration and for the first time a security operation center has been able to have visibility into the hypervisor. So that's where we started to see that potential and the opportunity and it also gave us an opportunity to really start to work closely with the Vmworld team, understand their culture, understand their community, understand their leadership, their commitment to winning, understanding commitment to really sort of transform in security and it just became, we dated and it became just obvious that there is so much energy between our leadership and theirs, so much energy in terms of vision of you know, securing the world from, make them safe from cyber attacks and so it just made so much sense. So in Pat's words sure it de-risked the acquisition over a period of time but it also allowed us to really work closer together know what we're getting into and really getting super excited. So I can tell you the response from our employees has been overwhelming and their response here at Vmworld has been just amazing in terms of traffic and the partners, customers and all that. >> Dave: I asked Pat Gelsinger 5 years ago if the cube was security broken and he said "Yeah, it's broken" and I was like "what you going to do about it" stay tuned well, we've been tuned. I did an analysis of, and this may be, first of all Patrick is going to take over as to run Vmwares cloud security business? >> Tom: Correct. >> Dave: So when Patrick stated... >> John: Patrick Morelik >> Dave: Yeah, Patrick Morelik CEO of Carbon Black and Pat Gelsinger said that we want to be the cloud security company. >> Tom: Absolutely. >> Dave: Okay, so I love when they lace down aspirations like that, now this now may not be fair to you because you... >> Tom: We've been in the security, yeah. >> Dave: But there's a portfolio there that may not be as familiar with but I'll ask you anyway cause you're going to have to come familiar with it soon. So I did analysis of the Carbon Black acquisition, obviously app defense was in there but if you look at the VMware security portfolio, NSX has a micro segmentation. >> Tom: Absolutely. >> Dave: News case. Obviously, Air watch you know. >> Tom: Workspace One >> Dave: Competing with Workspace Once >> Tom: Absolutely >> Dave: Cloud Corio, E8 security bracket, Trinsic is another tuck in acquisition that VMware did so while their building up this portfolio, can you help us understand how that's shaping out and where Carbon Black fits. >> Tom: Yeah, absolutely. So let's talk about first the opportunity here. The opportunity is to leverage infrastructure management and security portfolio that VMware has and then sprinkling the Carbon Black portfolio, capabilities across that infrastructures, so in betting NSX for network to end point. And embedding works in base one, which we've already done. Embedding it with integrating app defense, which we've already done. The ability to do agent less within the steer, super super powerful. Post close we'll be working on things like that, so basically by integrating across that portfolio you really have the ability to transform the entire security space, and I'll talk about that in a second. But what that means is basically by embedding security across that infrastructure management and eliminate a lot of complexity in the overhead in the bloat you're coming up with basically intrinsic security. The best thing from a human prespective to increase your immune system, you know, is or staying healthy is boosting your immune system and the best way, reason we're doing this, the best best way to secure enterprise is to integrate, embed security into the actual infrastructure and take the benefits of infrastructure management with security, combine it and eliminate a lot complexity, so let's talk just a second about being broken. It's hard for a security guy coming in and saying the industry is broken, I will tell you that but truth is it needs to be transformed there is just no question about it. So let's talk about it just from in point perspective, and then we'll get into the whole opportunity to extend that capability. You look at the end point from a enterprise customer perspective it's well documented that you know Legacy AV was built 20 years ago and not built for the modern tact factor so it's well documented, yes customers still have Legacy AV, it's not, you know it's 35% effective so what have customers done? They've gone and deployed EDR and point detection response, which is what Carbon Black strive has been a market leader hands down market leader in this space in terms of adding EDR's, yet another sensor. Then you want to have the ability to say look we got workloads and there's another sensor for that. Then you want to talk about, hey, vulnerability is coming out and we want to be able to query across the fleet to understand what vulnerabilities were in your environment, tanium like, right, there's a sensor for that. So you know what 2 and a half years ago our customers came back to us and said look we love you guys, what you guys are doing but there's too many sensors on the end point bloating and slowing my systems and my security teams is getting fatigue with all this point tools they said we need a integrated approach, in comes the Carbon Black clouds and that's we're we had the ability to integrate multiple services, NG, next-gen anti-virus, EDR, Life ops, the ability to query across. We've integrated App D for hard workload all those are shipping today, all those service on single, soft, light weight sensor and a modern cloud native SAS back in with analytics, so it's just super powerful and so now you're consolidating on that, you're getting more efficient, you're eliminating overhead and you're making the security operations team that much more effective, now, imagine taking that approach to the broken network and workload and exedra and extending that capability across the entire infrastructure and that really is what we're talking about in terms of teaming with VMware embedding our security capabilities across infrastructure a lot across NXS into work app D into workspace one which we're already doing and again eliminating a lot of that bloat and making our customers more secure and much more efficient. >> Dave: So there's another dimension to this acquisition which I like which is your SAS business, so I think it's about 38% of your revenue, I call it roughly 40% of your revenue, but growing very very rapidly, growing to 70% of the year. >> Tom: Exactly. >> Dave: So VMware has said that this acquisition along with pivotal is going to have add a billion dollars in, basically, mostly in all subscription revenue next year and three billion in year two and it's going to be accretive in cash flow deposit acquisition by year two so all very, VMware actually keeps well generally in acquisitions and so notwithstanding some weird stuff in the economy they usually hit their targets. >> Tom: Yes. >> Dave: You know they intend to be conservative so I really like that and that's clearly the direction you're moving. The other thing about this, a lot of people on Wall street said well it's maybe overpaid for stock and I want to get your opinion. Cause you're out competing everyday and cloud strike is obviously the comparison to use, okay. Say a company is a 16/17 billion dollar valuation you're valuation was 2.7 billion, you look at cloud strikes post IPO's, doc chart, it looks like a bathtub you know, it kind of goes like this and then goes like that because people start to realize wow this asset actually has you know a lot of intrinsic value upon attend it. So in comparing cloud strike with Carbon Black in terms of feature, function, capabilities you know execution and those technology. Is it really that much of difference 16 billion and 2.7 billion (laughs) >> Tom: You know I can't really comment on Crowdstrike's market cap, obviously I respect them as a competitor. >> Dave: Great, great job. >> Tom: I don't have to like them but I respect them as a competitor no question. >> Dave: What in terms of the function and the capabilities. >> Tom: In terms of the functionality look we've significantly close the gap and adding cloud workload capability with app D adding the query kit with live ops and extending that capabilities so from a feature functionality look at VMware is technology driven they kick tires and they do the diligence on technology that's the strength of VMware, they look deep and what they came away with was we have a super competitive platform, you're seeing it in our wins our growth rate you're seeing it with our wins and large customers that I can't really name so from a feature functionality perspective you know we're at parr in many ways we're better now, now if you look at where the market is going look Crowdstrike is going to be a great point product solution for end point. But we believe, that they're going to do phenomenally well but we believe there's an opportunity here, again to integrate infrastructure management that VMWare has security capability and deliver an end to end platform and truly transform across the entire infrastructure of an enterprise so that really where we see the opportunity and the opportunity for growth and then you want to look at our growth rate I mean to your point, VMware does an incredible job and you know you start talking about the reach of VMware and talk about the reach of DellEMC and it's super exciting. >> Dave: Yeah the VMware brain trust is very capable both from a strategy standpoint and a technical, strong, very strong engineering culture. >> Tom: Yeah >> Dave: You saw this with Airwatch so Airwatch when VMware required Airwatch VMware was struggling what was then the VDI business and airwatch wasn't you know number one in the market place but VMware like now crushes, people are making similar analogy with regard to Carbon Black do you think that's fair, I mean you think you can repeat that sort of momentum. >> Tom: Yeah you know I've obviously been very very close to this relationship and I have been sort of the number one fan and cheerleader of this partnership because I just believe in my soul that it's going to be transformative really is so to that point I you know I think and I've talked about it internally what they've done with my serie what they've done with aiwth now workspace one and the ability to take a business from me no revenues or couple hundred million and take them to two billion. I absolutely believe you will see, it's going to take a lot of work but we're going to see rejectorty I've been focussed on if there are gaps we're going to force it in or anything to accelerate the road map to allow us to win and then you're going to talk about the triple acceleration with VMWare and DeliMC so answer I say I truly truly believe that we can take our position to number two and really be number one >> John: Transformative in a significant way a significant word to use. What's that end product going to be that makes you looking at it at this visionary stand point that, this is a perfect marriage this is a fantastic opportunity. You're not you're selling hard >> Tom: Yeah >> Dave: It's a platform really >> Tom: Look it is a platform and at the end of the day we're focused on here as customers we're talking about how do we protect our customers and the best way to protect those customers is to embed the capability you know we did many years back Carbon Black we exposed our data and many of our partners, sometimes we compete with cisco or firehire a number of other players because customers demand the end to end visibility from network to end point. Can you imagine the kind of damage when you integrate Carbon Black and our modern platform are analytics and the ability to pull data from hypervisor the ability to pull data from NSX to ability to pull data from workspace one into a common console and then understand exactly what is happening from an attack perspective and then let's talk about okay, so now you have the visibility it's a 360 degree view of what happening in the network now you want to talk about the ability to orgistrate or imidiate like solve the problem. Well historically it's been security operations center over here and you got IT over there. And there's been this friction because Sycguys says take it down take the server down there's a problem and the IT guys ops, hey, I got run time I got to keep it up so now you have the opportunity again to leverage that management to identify a threat and the ability to seemlessly leverage VMware infrastructure's management tools to instantly reimmediate and orgistrate a problem without the conflict with IT and security operations. So we've actually seen an opportunity to eliminate our friction and create coloboration between those two. >> Dave: And security is broken, it is a do over and to talk to ops team they'll tell you, we're fighting everyday and bombs are dropping, we have to succeed everyday. The bad guy only has to succeed once so yeah they bring in all these tools and a lot of times they don't work together and they have a very hard time to just figure out okay, what do we prioritize on and obviously analytics helping that but yeah, you see that stats after you get infiltrated to whatever 300 days 250 days they even identify that you have been infiltrated and it's just a very complex environment so the do over is a platform that will give you end visibility and doesn't force you to different point tools and it has a comprehensive in a view of your >> [Tom[ That Right >> Dave: Infrastructure >> Tom: That's right and I do want to point out it doesn't mean that we're going to create this platform that's closed. A lot of competitors like to built closed platforms and Carbon Black has always been API driven like open, and the whole point of this openness is to, we collect this powerful end point data and we want to expose that data across the infrastructure so we're exposing it to the network security guys whether it be Vectra or Palato networks or FireMandion depending on who it is. We're exposing that data to splunk IBMQ radar and IBM rasilion and we're going to continue to do that, leverage this platform and all this powerful delimentry and we're going to continue to have this open platform and continue to work across the industry to make sure it's not just our platform from the MDM just across the ecosystem. >> Dave: Well it's something VMware has been strong if this heritage genaty, you know they help you know balance the score card >> Tom: Yeah >> John: It's been a understatement that it's been an exciting week for you, it's been a great two years it sounds like and we wish you success now it's on down the road like he said a lot of hard work still ahead of you. >> Tom: Absolutely, so congratulations on ten years, I look forward being here in year 20. (laughs) >> John: We'll be right back, we'll be right back just taking a break here on the cube we're at Vmworld 2019. Moscone center, San Francisco. (music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by VMware the cube with Dave Vellante, John Walls. and really back to your relationship with for the first time we built that integration, first of all Patrick is going to take over Carbon Black and Pat Gelsinger said that may not be fair to you because you... So I did analysis of the Carbon Black Obviously, Air watch you know. this portfolio, can you help us understand across the fleet to understand what Dave: So there's another dimension to Dave: So VMware has said that this so I really like that and that's clearly the Tom: You know I can't really comment on Tom: I don't have to like them but I respect Dave: What in terms of the function Tom: In terms of the functionality Dave: Yeah the VMware brain trust is Dave: You saw this with Airwatch so one and the ability to take a business from me What's that end product going to be that and the ability to seemlessly leverage VMware that will give you end visibility and doesn't expose that data across the infrastructure and we wish you success now it's on down the Tom: Absolutely, so congratulations here on the cube we're at Vmworld 2019.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Patrick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Patrick Morelik | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Walls | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Barsi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carbon Black | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2.7 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
35% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
16 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
360 degree | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vmworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
300 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Airwatch | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
airwatch | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ten years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Vmwares | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NSX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sanjay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Abba Abbaszadi, Charles Russell Speechlys | VeeamON 2019
>> live from Miami Beach, Florida It's the que covering demon 2019. Brought to you, by the way. >> Welcome back to Miami. Everybody watching the Cube, The leader in live tech coverage. This is Day two of the mon 2019 3 cubes. Third year at V mon, We did New Orleans. We did Chicago last year. Course here at the Fountain Blue in Miami. Great venue for an event like this. I'm Dave a lot. It was my co host, Peter Burroughs. Abba Dabbas. Eye is Adi is here. He's the head of a Charles Russell speech. Liza London based law firm. How about great. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on. Thankyou. So you tell us about this judge. Interesting name. Charles Russell. Speech lease. It was a merger of two firms, Right. Tell us how it all came about. >> Back in 2,014 Charles, loss of species performed for a merger between two different companies. Charles docile and speaks Lee Burcham from a 90 perspective. That was very interesting for the two departments coming together s So we have a limited time period where we had to merge these two companies Two different systems different data centers, different data sets. So it was formed by emerging back in 2,014 for five years on way here today >> that we see this a lot, you know, Emanate goes down. The acquiring company of this sounds like it was a merger. You know, they sort of battle. Okay, who's going toe? Really? Which framework is going to win? Because I'm sure had that conversation. But so to take us through that merger, what it entailed what? What the scenario looked like and how you plan for it. Sure. >> So I was part of the Charles. Also legacy Charles Russell team on, then obviously speaks about. Some had their own team as well. So initially, when we first found out about the merger, it was essential for the two teams to get together to work out. Okay, What systems? You have free mail. What systems you have for document management system playing trump cards. Which is who's got the best system and which way do we wantto move forward? A little. >> Ah, >> so but being a law firm, most law firms around the world and in the UK especially used the same types of software so essentially that from that perspective it was It was it was quite simple. But then way had to work out. How do we How do we go forward with this? Because two different headquarters in the London area. Which office do we move into? Sort of logistics around that. Can we fit in pre merger? It was six. Charles Lawson had sickle. Roughly 600 people, especially birds, had roughly 500 people. So pretty comparable. Yeah, yeah. So working out space logistics was was an issues >> making that even even more complicated, right? Yeah. >> One of the things that's interesting about a law firm, like versus a traditional manufacturer or AW financial services firm that has a lot of very fast right writing systems and have to scale on those lines is a law firms feature very complex dogs, very complex in from out of files, a lot of files that are written. But at the same time, you have to be repurposed to a lot of different work flows very sensitive to external contingent regulatory change. And so you have all of that happening, especially, I mean, two years ago from now on MySpace steak, and it was you're getting into brexit stuff, too, so that also had to be a source of uncertainty. So how has it been combining external regulatory issues the way that technology is being used in law firms and some of the new work clothes that you guys trying to support? And then adding, On top of that, the complexity of bringing these two firm GPR >> GPO itself was It was a year old project for us on. Obviously, we've got offices. The Middle East, but obviously is in the Far East on DH in Central Europe has well, so data logistics or where it sits, is an issue for us as well. So GDP, ours being a big project for us in terms of the merger itself. It was it was very, very difficult for the two I T departments to come together on actually work out. How how do we go to one unified systems? Essentially one doctor man, just in one email system. All of that took a lot of plan in law project management on essentially within the legal press itself. We got doubted in the time frames that we had that we can achieve it on within. I think It was 18 month period. We had merged order, different systems and various offices because speech the Bertram and Time is what I had. Offices in Zurich and Geneva were to merge with different offices together as well. So it was. It was a big, big task for the i T department on the firm itself. >> They're very tight migration deadlines. And and as you started to approach those deadlines you had to worry about, Okay, When we're going to cut over, how do we avoid downtime? How do we make sure that we don't? You know, I have bad data, data, corruption and the like. So how did you plan for that? And how did it go? >> So wait, we're here. C'mon on DH. Veen was It was it was a big part of our migration process. So where we had two different parts of the business Different storage systems, Different actualization system's way used to mean a CZ. The middleman basically, to my great data, from one day to center to another, using swink it. So where there was a large amount of terabytes and terabytes, amount of data way had swing kit available to us using team were able to be to be essentially a love the environments into the swing care and then bring them over to the other side of the business. And vain was essentially part on on top of that, making sure that the data that we were coming that will bring in a cross is true and not corrupt on DH, that using some of their technology is sure backups and stuff like that really, really was essential to, you know, do migration going well >> And was was Wien installed and both organizations at the time? Or was that something that you had to sort of redeploy? >> And yeah, So Legacy Charles also had way was actually myself going back probably eight years ago. Version For a time, I think team had 20,000 customers. So to here >> there were version 10 now 33 150 >> 1,001,000, 4,000 month. >> That makes me proud that we invested in vain when we did good car. So yeah, it was It was a good call from us, and essentially three other side of the business did not have. But then we just wait. Expanded our Venus State to look at both sides and then bring him across on. And then, ever since then, we've grown our vamos state across the world, across all of officers. So >> So how did you do that? So that was that was another migration that had to occur. And did you? You kind of do those simultaneously. Did you do the theme of migration first, and then bring the two systems together? >> Do you seem to do Stouffer special sauce in the migration? >> Yeah. So Veen was essentially a tool that we used to my great data sensors from one data center to another using their backup technology using their replication technology, we were able to replicate all of one side's virtual machines to the other. And then that gave us that gave us the flexibility as well. When when we had the limited down time periods that we've had, they give us the flexibility to actually Circe the business is during these particular ours. We're not gonna be able to You're not gonna have access to these systems because we're going to bring up systems from point A to point B. So veen was essential to them if >> you had to do it over again. If he had a mulligan, what would you have done differently? What what advice might you give to somebody who's trying to go through a similar migration? >> I would say Give your partners and lawyers more realistic time. Pray the time frame that we would get. >> Or don't let them give you an unrealistic time for him. >> Exactly. Yeah, so says ensured that the amount of work it's it's not just day to itself. You know, we're talking network and we're talking security. We're talking, you know, to to similar sized companies coming together. We were very, very limited time frame, consolidating all of their systems into one which is essential for the two parts of the business to collaborate together because, you know, way could have taken our time. We could have got to take this free four years a CE, far as we're concerned. But the fact that we did do it in such a quick time for him and that business to parts of the business from Day one can collaborate much better with each other. So >> we talked a lot about digital business transformation and you know, our approach or our observations on the digital business transformations, the process by which you altar and change your firm to re institutionalize the work. Change your game. Tomato Grover. All governments model as you use data as an asset, so that's affecting every firm everywhere. How's it affecting a law firm and you know your law from specifically on? How is that going to change your stance in your approach to data protection >> Data is incredibly important to unlawful. A zit is to most most organizations, but in terms of, you know, one of one of the things that's quite important in terms of law firms. We work with the financial institutions, so we held information by that. We hold personal data way hold all times of information. Charles Oscar speech leads works with Aware is of law apart from Kunal. So the areas of law that they worked with his vast in terms of the amount of data that we hold and essentially I mean, for us data is the most important thing that runs the firm and having visibility tow our data. How do we How do we work that data? How do we then market based on the data that we have? How do we market ourselves from that data. You know, there might be one area the business that's dealing with a family issue, family law. But then, you know that that could correspond with the litigation issue. You know, how do we work that data? To be to be an advancing to our businesses is extremely important. For >> what? What do you think of the announcements this week? I'm kind of curious. I was liketo ask the practitioners of what they think about. You know what was announced. You had, uh, well, you had the ve made $1,000,000,000. That's kind of fun and cool, but But you had the with the program, which was kind of interesting. The whole ap I look the beam availability orchestrator, where they're really talking about recovering from backups as a host that needed to recover from, you know, a replicated instance. You know, some of the automated testing stuff was kind of interesting. They talked about dynamic documentation, things you saw this week that you'll actually go back and say, Hey, I can apply that to solve a problem. Sure. >> So, essentially, I think I've been a really good question is very relevant to us many of not just ourselves law firm but many of the other law firms around the world are now looking at cloud based services now for us. I mean, this was a big thing five years ago way you know, everyone was talking about public clouds. Us. We're now we're now looking clouds and where basically, we've bean pushed by the vendors themselves to go towards cloudlike Citrix, for example. Their licensing model was based around their services. So is Microsoft in Mike's off? You don't you don't really have, you know, exchange anymore. Within premises you have off 365 A lot of the SAS applications are moving toward the cloud on DH. What wrote me? I had to say doing the keynote in regards to act, too. And how team are trying to be the visionaries in terms of look at that cloud is their next big thing for the next 10 years, offering often a crucial and for businesses like ours who have limited exposure to cloud technologies limited understanding, essentially having a tool that could migrate from one cloud to another. It's fantastic, you know, we've offered, you know I've spoken to, obviously are United directors around the other law firms where I wanted to have gone to the public cloud. But they don't know how to come back in and having a tall that essentially gives you that flexibility to bring it back in house to go form a ws to zoo. Or if there's a particular assess application, for example, that piers better with a W s. But you've got your other application that piers with that particular application is your Why would you want to have in the door? You'll probably want to move into a W eso for us, I think. What? The message coming out of'em on this year has bean really, really helpful for us. >> So So when you started with theme, they had it said 20,000 custom You like the 20001st customer on DIT was coincided with the virtual ization, you know, craze. Do you feel like the team knowing what you know about them, you have a lot of experience with them Consort of Replicate that success in this town intendant and in Act two, >> I think when I first looked at them, Wow, this is really, really simple. It's a bit like an iPhone. You know you given iPhone to your grandmother or to your children, and they have to play with it. And I see the beam as an intuitive piece of software that easy fighting professionals to get on with it, as their slogan said a few years ago. It just works. It does just work. Wear were great advocates of him. It's worked wonders for us. We've acquired smaller businesses using we've managed companies using and when I see you know, when you go to the sessions and you see the intelligence behind their thinking, I think going back to your question I think Wei si oui, si, vamos a strategic partner for us when we see their vision and we believe in their vision, and I think what they're doing in terms of what they working on next few years, I think we're well favor there, and I think, you know, essentially, that's where the most of their business is going to come from, >> where you sit down with, you know, rat mayor over over vodka and he says, Tell me the one thing I could do to make your life you know, easier, better you can't say cut prices s a hellhole. But what would you advise him to >> make my life better >> other than Jim instead of >> yeah, eyes that >> would make you crazy. >> So in terms of a zoo, a technology, >> your business relationship or something, she'd like to see them do that would. I >> think in terms of mergers and acquiring companies, seen license rentals will be a good thing. I know, I know. They give you a valuation license keys, and that's something that you can use. So, for example, if we were to acquire a company that has hundreds of servers and PM's having license rentals for a period of time, able >> to spin it up and spin it down actually allowed >> Exactly. Yeah, that would be an advantage. I think in terms of what you know what they're doing in the marketplace, and a lot of law firms use him. I feel I can't do any more than they are doing now. And in all the years that we've used to be my fingers on eight years now, but we've only had one serious problem, and the way they got that problem, you know the way, the way they communicated to reverse the way they a lot of different teams across the the Europe and the US go involved. I think, you know, in terms of service, in terms of software, in terms of what they what they do for us. I don't think there's anything more to add. Teoh. Right? Maia's vision. >> That's great for their custom of it. Well, thanks so much for coming on. The Cube is not heavy. Really? Thank you very much. You're welcome to keep it right there, buddy Peter, and I'll be back with our next guests right after this short break. We're live from Miami at the front of Blue Hotel. You're watching the Cube from Vienna on 2019 right back.
SUMMARY :
live from Miami Beach, Florida It's the que covering So you tell us about this judge. So it was formed by emerging back in 2,014 that we see this a lot, you know, Emanate goes down. What systems you have for document management system playing the same types of software so essentially that from that perspective it was It was it was quite simple. making that even even more complicated, right? law firms and some of the new work clothes that you guys trying to support? It was it was very, very difficult for the two I T departments to come together on actually work out. started to approach those deadlines you had to worry about, Okay, When we're going to cut over, really, really was essential to, you know, do migration going well So to here That makes me proud that we invested in vain when we did good car. So how did you do that? point A to point B. So veen was essential to them if What what advice might you give to somebody who's trying to go through a similar migration? Pray the time frame that we would get. of the business to collaborate together because, you know, way could have taken our time. we talked a lot about digital business transformation and you know, our approach or our observations on the but in terms of, you know, one of one of the things that's quite important in terms of What do you think of the announcements this week? I mean, this was a big thing five years ago way you customer on DIT was coincided with the virtual ization, you know, You know you given iPhone to your grandmother But what would you advise him to your business relationship or something, she'd like to see them do that would. and that's something that you can use. I think, you know, in terms of service, Thank you very much.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Zurich | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Peter Burroughs | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lee Burcham | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Miami | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two firms | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two systems | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New Orleans | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Geneva | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
$1,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vienna | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two teams | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Jim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Abba Abbaszadi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Charles Russell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Miami Beach, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two parts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two departments | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chicago | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
18 month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Maia | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Charles Lawson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Central Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Legacy Charles | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both organizations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Charles | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one doctor | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
Third year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two different companies | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Charles Oscar | PERSON | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Middle East | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Abba Dabbas | PERSON | 0.97+ |
one email system | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Liza London | PERSON | 0.97+ |
two different headquarters | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Aware | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
Adi | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Bertram | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Charles Russell Speechlys | PERSON | 0.95+ |
33 150 | OTHER | 0.94+ |
90 perspective | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Venus State | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
two different parts | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
20001st customer | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
this year | DATE | 0.92+ |
V mon | EVENT | 0.92+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.9+ |
DIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
i T | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
2,014 | DATE | 0.88+ |
Citrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
3 cubes | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Tomato Grover | PERSON | 0.86+ |
version 10 | OTHER | 0.86+ |
Two different systems | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Chris McNabb, Dell Boomi | Dell Technologies World 2019
>> Live from Las Vegas, it's theCUBE! Covering Dell Technologies World 2019, brought to you by Dell technologies and it's ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back to Las Vegas, Lisa Martin with Stu Miniman theCUBE coming to you from Dell Technology Worlds 2019 day one, there's only about 15 thousand people here and about four thousand of Dell Technologies closest partners. We're very pleased to welcome back one of our Alumni to theCUBE, Chris McNabb the CEO of Dell Boomi. Chris thanks for joining us! >>u Lisa it's great to be here, Stu great to see you again. You know it's really exciting. >> This morning we've had such an electric day, I'd say we're half way through day one. This mornings key note kicked off with a lot of energy. First of all I have to say Michael Dell coming out to Queen music, that was for me you had me at hello. >> Yeah me too. After seeing Bohemian Rhapsody, it was the only way to go. >> He must be a fan of the movie! >> Exactly. >> Yeah Chris do you have your walk on music picked yet? >> I don't yet I'm still kind of shuffling through a couple different options. >> Okay well we can help with that, we're music fans too. >> Gotcha. >> But so much excitement, so much energy, so much collaboration across all of Dells brands, Michael saying with big energy, Boomi is leading with cloud data integration. Talk to us about what's going on at Boomi we were with you guys about five months or so ago at Boomi World, what's happening now, what's exciting you? >> So every day is exciting at Boomi we continue to grow extraordinarily rapidly across the world and we are focused on accelerating business outcomes for our customers, it is simple as that. It's why our customers stay with us we have over 97% retention rate so we're successful at doing that and when you can come in and produce wins for people, you know they have data silos all over the place, they need to be able to reconnect their systems, apps, databases, but also their processes, people and devices. And once you look at that whole landscape when you can come in and reunify that for them in a way in which they can engage customers, partners or employees in new ways, it's just a huge win and it's a pleasure to get up out of bed every morning without problem. >> Chris It's a powerful story I have to admit it took me a little while to kind of squint through and understand what Boomi did because a lot of times it's like oh it's the cool cloud native, new factor everything like that and we understand getting from the applications that I have today to you know whatever that digitalization, monetization, modernization I have is challenging and there's multiple ways to get there so if I can the thing that was exciting is we hear a lot you know let's meet you where you are and a lot of that is my applications and my processes, my work flow so to modernize and go through that digital transformation, some of it is to create brand new but a lot of that is how do I get what I have to that new multi cloud environment and that was the shout out I heard from Michael this morning about Pivotal, VMware, and Boomi as part of that spectrum to help get us there. Do I have that right? >> Yeah Stu you do, it's just listen, Hybrid IT is going to be here a really long time. People are going to try and survive a scenario where you've got 15 different apps built by 15 different vendors, you've got shadow databases, you've got all this stuff and you're like, but I've got customer data everywhere. So when you're looking for something as simple as a list of customers, what list? None of those data sources are the same, so how do you aggregate that, how do you filter that, how do you do it. So Boomi doesn't want people to just survive Hybrid IT, Boomi wants you to thrive in that environment, want you to really get going and be able to easily unite that, aggregate that, filter that as necessary. So now I have a unified data set in which I can go and engage my sales force and my customers with, and that's really where we play is trying to get it all to be reconnected or unified. >> It's essential everything is about the customer experience, Stu and I were just at a show that was all focused on CX but to have a good customer experience you have to have the right technologies enabling your own workforce to deliver what the customer needs because customer satisfaction yield business outcomes, it's a whole cycle there. >> Yeah. >> For our viewers who want a better vision of where does Boomi fit into you know, I'm a Dell EMC customer, I'm VMware customer, where does Boomi fit in and help these customers to transform that integration layer that allows them to take advantage of this exciting multi cloud world? >> Yeah so Lisa I'll just tell you a really quick story, I'll tell you a personal story. When Boomi has been growing very very rapidly, 62% growth through last year alone, so we're adding people really really fast. As a result of that scale we were horrible at onboarding our new employees, we had a really bad problem, so we looked to our own platform to transform our business and our net new employees experience with that business. Long story short I didn't have people, everybody was busy, I got one of our partners to use our platform to create an entire new employee onboarding process for Boomi. Our net new employee just kind of jumped to the end of the deal, we now have a 21st century engagement mechanism for our employees, that partner of ours put that whole solution together and put it into production in four months, most importantly let's talk about business outcomes. My net new employee NPS went from minus 76, worse number I've ever heard in anything, been in IT 30 years, to plus 92, six months after it's in production we're ready to go. So now to give you a sense, people used to have to fill out a case and go to our case management, fill out a case, schedule a meeting to get a picture taken to get their security badge, now selfie, do you like it, submit, you're done. And all of that, the mobile app that tracks it and performs it, all the engagement, all the interaction with all the systems, we provision our employees across 27 different systems all instantaneous, that used to take us 60 days to get them on to all those different systems. So all of those outcomes is all done with the Boomi platform, the integration requirements, the low code, and the mobile app is all Boomi. So that's why we focus on outcomes. >> So Chris in the key note this morning, want to understand how Boomi fits into some of these environments. We saw Microsoft obviously a big push, long Dell partner, and the other one Kubernetes is the area for all the cloud native discussion and various pieces. How do those fit in to your world? >> So Stu first of all to really understand sort of the bigger picture with Dell and their transformation story right, essential hardware provider, infrastructure provider, you've got VMware and Virtustrea almost making an infrastructure as a service sort of like the bottom of a triangle. You have Pivotal cloud boundary, building applications for competitive advantage right, and then no application works without data. And when you talk about it from a platform perspective that's how I like to think about it and explain it to people that's how Dell Technologies can bring all of this to the table and focus it now on your transformation. When ti comes to the specifics around what VMware and Pivotal are doing with Kubernetes and Google and some other folks and so on, the way we distribute integrations is basically via container technologies, we've had Docker Support now Kubernetes support, so it's very native to us that's how we can manage it from one spot and yet deploy really anywhere as it runs, so there's a lot of data capabilities that really align very well with Pivotal, we also have the Pivotal Data Services Tile so if you're an application developer, you're building that really cool app and oh that's ready to go but you need data from somewhere, you click the Boomi tile it's that data services tile, you can embed it right into your code, in and out comes the data sort seamlessly for you, it's a much better experience for the developer. So all of these companies are coming together to make sure these platforms align in such a way that our transform and outcome focus for our Dell technologies customers. >> We've heard a lot of that, companies coming together. Collaboration was one of the themes I took away from this mornings key note with the guys and gals that were on stage. We've heard that from Dell Technologies, Dell EMC folks, this morning, today, yourself. That collaborative effort is really clear when you're talking to customers. Speaking of collaborating with customers on the evolution and iterations and things, what were some of the, I'm curious, the theme of Boomi world was you guys were going to reinvent iPads, about five months since, you're smiling. >> Yeah. Talk to us about how you've collaborated with some of your key customers to do that, where you are today five months after saying hey, this is what we're going to do we're going to shake this up. >> The future of iPads is extraordinarily exciting, and come to Boomi world next year and we're going to tell you a really good story. But when you talk about redefining the ion iPads, going from integration platforms of service to intelligent platforms of service, and how AIML can change this game. We brought together key partners who have had extensive experience both in AIML, a lot of big public companies that you would know, as well as our customers and now you start looking at things in combination to dramatically speed up how integrations done and who's capable of doing it. I always felt like if I could get integration down into the hands of business analyst, and down into the hands of smart people but not software engineers, leave them for the really hard technical problems, the things that push your business forward, and not hey I need a data set from HR for salary reasons or whatever. And voice and combination with AI allowing you to generate and respond to natural language, hey sales force I'd like the pipeline report for Western North America please, back comes the data set and all you have to do as a user of that is form a question and humans are awesome at that they've been doing it since they were two, and when you can start to leverage that kind of capability, AIML for natural language, you figure out how to interact with it, you get patterns on how to do that that's in our database from the thousands of people that have interacted. So when we look at the future, leveraging our partners for skills that we're not expert at yet, AIML gave us a leep, customers what is it that you need us to do first? And we're starting to bring all that together In a very very interesting way. >> Alright so Chris Boomi has it's own show, but I'm sure there's a lot of overlap between the customers here. What are some of the key objectives and what's your teams goals for this week here at Dell Technologies World? >> Well this week here you know we have a lot of customers here as well, obviously in the Boomi World show we're very specific to the user community that we've got so you get a lot of tracks about specific tips and tricks that you can have and specific ways to do things, best practices, did you know we could do this, did you know that, all that kind of things. Here it's a little bit broader picture, you're dealing with a broader audience, there's more of an awareness problem in some cases some people aren't quite sure what Boomi does and why Dell Technologies has a company like Boomi, so we're here to change that from an awareness side. Got some really cool demos in how we do that, and kind of engage, and then we have our specific customers who we can pull off to the side and talk about their specific challenges. What's next for them, what're the next transformations they want to achieve and what's the next outcome they've got in line and how can we partner with them to help them achieve that. So it's really kind of a two fold kind of a thing, our booth is awareness and is there an opportunity to work together and partners, what's the next step for us. >> One of the things I heard when you shared that Boomi's personal story, the Boomi on Boomi story was the massive impacts that you've made to just the employee onboarding process and I shouldn't say just because we all know, again we talked about customer experience a few minutes ago and that's essential for any business, but to have a good customer experience you have to have successful, enabled, productive employees on all that lines, front lines, middle lines, back lines, et cetera. When you are talking with prospects who maybe are very familiar with Dell Technologies and most of the brands, how well does that story resonate that this is really fundamental integration, especially in this big hybrid multi cloud world in which we live, to have this integration as a core enabler of digital transformation, but also of employee experience, customer experience, business outcomes. >> You know Lisa a lot of times when you talk to people, like if I were to tell you the Boomi story and we had never met it's a little hard to believe that I could do that much and have that big of an impact in four months. It's kind of like oh okay, is he selling me? So a lot of times when we meet people for the first time, if we can get them to just give us a chance, we do a lot of proof of concepts with people, we're cloud software so I can give it to you right now, I could just set you up with an account in three minutes and you're off and running. So you can play with it, you can get experienced with it, you can kind of understand how we do that. Like if we have a claim that we're six times faster than Legacy providers it's like well how do you do that? Well you get a sense of how we do that, and how leverage, meditate it, we use AI to do that, we generate things for you, et cetera. So there's a bit of a awareness and then they take that Missouri side, but can you show me, I'm not sure I believe you, show me. We do that in POC's and then we can kind of really get the ball rolling. So that tends to be the general pattern that we go through with net new customers and prospects, to try and get them exposure. >> You guys have I think it's over eight thousand, over 82 hundred customers globally, you've got some big brands, you've got Lyft, you've got Sky, Chevron, GE, one of my favorite stories from Boomi World was one of your customer award winners, Digital Angel, and how they're reinventing this smart bed technology for hospitals in the Netherlands. Something I wasn't aware of before even technology in a mattress. Talk to us about how Boomi is an enabler there. >> Well it's such a great outcome story. So the smart mattress is intended for the Geriatric Nursing Home settings, and one of the biggest most fundamental problems with health care in a geriatric setting is infection with body sores, decubs, and very simply moisture is a massive cause, lack of movement is a massive cause, and it depends a little bit on age and so on but so they install the smart mattress in all the rooms, and it records and its monitoring your breaths, your perspiration, any moisture events, your heart rate, and so on, and all this data it's just spitting out data and Boomi's there to catch it. Now what Boomi does is it sits on the mattress, and just processes data and as long as everything's fine it just sort of processes it, the minute any thresholds are met, so if you haven't moved in two hours, two hours is kind of a magic number for people if you have not moved in two hours, Boomi immediately sends up an alert in the form of a case, and this case in Tampa Bay in their service now system it shows up on their board priority one case, go get Lisa and give her a nudge, get her to move around a little bit. Same with a moisture event, that's a priority one, go dry them and so on, and they've been able to dramatically reduce the infection rate for the elderly as they reside in these nursing home settings just to be attentive, they know immediately when something needs to be done and only when it's done, you don't get the false positive. So that setting to me and what Digital Angel's doing with that mattress is changing outcomes, and then Boomi just sits on all the mattresses and communicates the individual to the common nursing setting, it's great. >> Pretty powerful stuff. >> It's awesome like I said it's fun when you can make such a big outcome change for people that who you get that kind of reduction in infections in a short period of time, it's very exhilarating. >> So Chris last thing I wanted to ask is, it's addressing people always often look at the pieces of the Dell family as independent and on their own, they've got their brand their on the banner and everything, but you know we talked to Rory about and we saw on the stage this morning a lot of how the pieces are really working together from the top strategy all the way down to the field, how they're working together, give us your perspective as one of the CEO's in the Dell family as to how that's moving. >> Stu I refer to it for folks as our unfair competitive advantage, it's as simple as that. The horse power, the just sheer sort of economy's of scale, and the technical ability, the innovation and the customer first perspective that all these business bring together, as we come together and work together, we have an ability to change customers lives forever in combination and I haven't met a leader of a business that has said well wait a minute, where's my piece of the puzzle, where is this, how do I win, there are no I's when we come together. Rory running the Virtustream business and we're talking about Boomi now runs on Virtustream and as you move mission critical applications how can you get Boomi there so people can share the SAP data that's there now in Virtustream, into other parts of the organization. Talked about the Pivotal Tile, I've got some work going on with Sanjay at VMware, and it's never I, it's always how do we do more for our customers and when we do that and then you put the Dell go to market field behind it, I don't know how many there are 20, 30 thousand sales makers in Dell technologies alone doesn't include VMware and the rest of us, it's an extraordinarily powerful ecosystem that is focused on one thing, customer results. And I'll tell you it couldn't be better, as a leader of a business within there, it literally couldn't be better. >> Wow Chris that is outstanding thank you so much for sharing your perspectives -- >> My pleasure. >> And what's going on with Boomi, we look forward to seeing you at Boomi World 2019. >> Lisa I can't wait, Stu I hope you can make it this time. But thank you very much I really appreciate you having me one. >> Oh our pleasure. For Stu Miniman, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching us live in Vegas, day one of Dell Technology World's 2019, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Dell technologies to you from Dell Technology u Lisa it's great to be here, Stu great to see you again. First of all I have to say it was the only way to go. kind of shuffling through Okay well we can help with we were with you guys at doing that and when you can come in of that spectrum to help get us there. so how do you aggregate have to have the right So now to give you a sense, So Chris in the key note this morning, and oh that's ready to go but the theme of Boomi world was you guys Talk to us about how you've collaborated and when you can start to leverage What are some of the key objectives and and tricks that you can and most of the brands, can give it to you right now, for hospitals in the Netherlands. and communicates the individual to for people that who you and we saw on the stage and as you move mission you at Boomi World 2019. hope you can make it this time. Oh our pleasure.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Comcast | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Elizabeth | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Gillan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Clark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Gillin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Savannah | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Richard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Micheal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carolyn Rodz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vallante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Eric Seidman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Keith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris McNabb | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carolyn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Qualcomm | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Alice | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2006 | DATE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
congress | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AT&T | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Elizabeth Gore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Gillen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Madhu Kutty | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1999 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Michael Conlan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Michael Candolim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Yvonne Wassenaar | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mark Krzysko | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Willie Lu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Yvonne | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hertz | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2012 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |