Carl Perry, Snowflake | Snowflake Summit 2022
(calm music) >> Welcome to theCUBE's live coverage of Snowflake Summit '22 from Las Vegas, Caesars Forum. Lisa Martin here with Dave Vellante, we're going to unpack some really cool stuff next, in the next 10 minutes with you, Carl Perry joins us, the Director of Product Management at Snowflake, he's here to talk about Snowflake's new Unistore workloads, how it's driving the next phase of innovation, welcome to the program. >> Oh, thank you so much for having me, this is awesome. >> There's a ton of momentum here, I saw the the numbers from fiscal 23Q1, product revenue 394 million, 85% growth, a lot of customers here, the customer growth is incredible as well, talk to us about Unistore, what is it? Unpack it and how have the customers been influential in it's development? >> Yeah, so Unistore is a way for customers to take their transactional workloads, for their enterprise applications and now have them run on or be built on top of Snowflake and now, you have your transactional data, along with all of your historical data, so now you have a single unified platform for doing anything you need to do with your data, whether it's transactional, single row look-ups, we can do that, whether it's the analytical data across again, transactional and historical data in a single query, our customers are super excited about this. >> So, what are Hybrid Tables? Is that just an extension of external tables? >> Yeah, that's a great question. So, Hybrid Tables are a new table-type that we've added to Snowflake and Hybrid Tables are really kind of just like another table with a couple of key differences, so number one is that Hybrid Tables provide fast, fine-grain read and write operations, so when you do something like a select star from customers where customer ID=832, that's going to return extremely fast, but on top of that same data, your transactional data, you can actually perform amazing analytical queries that return extremely fast and that's what Hybrid Tables at their core are. >> So, what does this mean for, so you're bringing that world of transaction and analytics together, what does it mean for customers? Walk us through Carl, an example of- >> Yeah, so it's great, so Adobe is a customer that is looking at using and leveraging Hybrid Tables today, and then more broadly Unistore, and frankly, Adobe has been an amazing customer since they started their journey, just really quickly, they're in phase three, the first phase was customers had data in Snowflake that they wanted to take advantage of with the Adobe Campaign Platform and so what they did is they built a connector basically into and being able to access customer data, and then they started to look at, "Well, this thing's working really well, let's try to leverage Snowflake for all our analytical needs." And so that was kind of phase two, and now phase three is like, look let's go and reimagine what we can do with the Adobe Campaign Platform by having both the transactional and analytical data in the same platform, so that they can really enable their customers to do personalization, ad campaign management, understanding the ethicacy of those things at a scale that they haven't been able to do before. >> Prior to this capability, they would what? Have to go outside of the Snowflake Data Cloud? And do something else? And then come back in? >> Exactly, right? So, they'd have a transactional system where all of the transactional state for what the customer was doing inside Adobe Campaign, setting up all their campaigns and everything, and that would be stored inside a database, right? And then they would need to ensure that, that data was moved over to Snowflake for further analytical purposes, right? You know you imagine the complexity that our customers have to manage every single day, a separate transactional system, an ETL pipeline to keep that data flowing and then Snowflake, right? And with Unistore, we really believe that customers will be able to remove that complexity from their lives and have that single platform that really makes their lives easier. >> I mean, they'll still have a transactional system, will they not? Or do you see a day where they sort of sunset that? >> I mean, there's a set of workloads that are not going to be the best choice today for Unistore and Hybrid Tables, right? And so we know that customers will continue to have their own transactional systems, right? And there's lots of transactional systems that customers rely and have entire applications, and systems built around, right? Right now with Hybrid Tables and Unistore, customers can take those enterprise applications, not consumer-facing applications and move them over to leverage Snowflake, and then really think about re-imagining how they can use their data that's both realtime transactional, as well as all the historical data without the need to move things between systems or use a ton of different services. >> The Adobe example that you just gave seems like, I loved how you described the phases they're in, they're discovering, it's like peeling the onion and just discovering more, and more, but what it sounds like is that Snowflake has enabled Adobe to transform part of it's business, how is Unistore positioned to be so transformational for your customers? >> Well, I mean I think there's a couple of things, so one, they have this like level of complexity today for a set of applications that they can completely stop worrying about, right? No need to maintain that separate transactional system for that again, enterprise application, no need to maintain that ETL pipeline, that's kind of like one step, the next step is, I mean all your data's in Snowflake, so you can start leveraging that data for insight and action immediately, there's no delay in being able to take advantage of that data, right? And then number three, which I think is the most compelling part is because it's part of Snowflake, you getting the benefit of Snowflake's entire ecosystem, whether it's first party capabilities like easy to manage and enforce really powerful governance, and security policies, right? Being able to take data from the market place and actually join it with my realtime transactional data, this is game-changing and then most importantly is the third-party ecosystem of partners who are building all these incredible solutions on top of Snowflake, I can't even begin to imagine what they're going to do with Hybrid Tables in Unistore. >> So, Carl I have to ask you, so I talked to a lot of customers and I talked to a lot of technology companies, explain, so Snowflake obviously was the first to separate compute from storage and you know the cloud, cloud database and then tons of investment came into that space, kind of follow you on, so that's cool, you reached escape velocity, awesome, but a lot of the companies that I talked to are saying, "We're converging transaction and analytics," I think (speaking softly) calls it HTAP or something, they came up with a name, explain the difference between what you're doing and what everybody else is doing, and why, what customer benefits you're delivering? >> Yeah, so I mean I think that's a really great question and to use the term you used HTAP, right? It's a industry understood term, really when people think about HTAP, what that is about is taking your transactional data that you have and enabling you to do fast analytical capabilities on that, and that's great, but there are a couple of problems that historical HTAP solutions have suffered from, so number one, that acceleration, that colander format of data is all in memory, so you're bound by the total amount of memory that you can use to accelerate the queries that you want to, so that's kind of problem one, this is not the approach that Snowflake is taking, most importantly, it's not just about accelerating queries on transactional data, whether it's a single-row lookup or a complex aggregate, it's about being able to leverage that data within the data cloud, right? I don't want to have a separate dataset on a transactional system or an HTAP system that can give me great analytics on transactional data and then I can't use it with all the other data that I have, it's truly about enabling the transformation with the data cloud and completely taking away silos, so that your data, whether it's realtime, whether it's historical, can be treated as a single dataset, this is the key thing that is different about Unistore, you can take the power of the data cloud, all of it, all of the partners, all the solutions and all the capabilities we continue to add, and leverage your data in ways that nobody's thought of possible before. >> Governance is a huge, huge component of that, right? So, in the press release, you have this statement, "As part of the Unistore Snowflake is introducing Hybrid Tables," you explained that, "Which offer fast, single-row operations and allow customers to build transactional business applications directly on Snowflake"- >> Yep. >> That's a little interesting tidbit, so you expect customers are going to build transactional applications inside the data cloud? And somewhat minimize the work that is going to be required by their existing transactional databases, correct? >> Exactly and I think, so let me say a couple things on this, right? So, first of all, there's a class of applications that will be able to just build on top of Hybrid Tables and run on Snowflake directly, for their transactional needs, I think what's super interesting here though is when you again start to talk about all your data, one example that we're going to walk through tomorrow in our talk is being able to do a transaction that updates data in a Hybrid Table and then updates data in a Standard Snowflake Table, and then either being able to atomically commit, or rollback that transaction, this is a transaction that's spanning multiple different table types inside Snowflake and you'll have consistency of either the rollback or the commit, this type of functionality doesn't exist elsewhere and being able to take, and build transactional applications with these capabilities, we think is transformative- >> And that's all going to happen inside the Snowflake Data Cloud, with all the capabilities and it's not like you know what you're doing with Dell and Pure, it's nice, but it's read-only, you can't you know add and delete, and do all that stuff, this is Native? First class citizen inside the database? >> Yep, just like other table types, you'll be able to take on and leverage the power of the data cloud as a normal table that you'd be able to use elsewhere. >> Got to ask you, your energy in the way that you're talking about this is fantastic, the transformation that it's going to be, how central it is to the product innovations that Snowflake is coming out with, what's been the feedback from customers? As there's so many thousands of folks here today, the keynote was standing in your room only, there was an overflow, what are you hearing on the floor here? >> Well, I mean, I think it was funny in the talk when I announced that primary keys are going to be required and enforced, and we got a standing ovation, I was like, "Wow, I didn't expect people to be so excited about primary key enforcement." I mean, what's been amazing both about the private preview and the feedback we're getting there, and then some of the early feedback we're getting from customers is that they want to understand and they're really thinking about like, "Wait, I can use Snowflake for all of this now?" And honestly I think that people are kind of like, "But wait, what would I do if I could have those applications running on Snowflake and not have to worry about multiple systems? Wait, I can combine it with all my historical data and anything that's in the data cloud, like what can I do?" Is the question they're asking and I think that this is the most fascinating thing, customers are going to build things they haven't been able to build before and I'm super excited to see what they do. >> But more specifically, my takeaway is that customers, actually application builders are going to be able to build applications that have data inherent to those apps, I mean John Furrier years ago said, "You know data is the new development kit." And it never happened the data, the data stack if you will separate from the application development stack, you're bringing those two worlds together, so what do you think the implications are of that? >> Well, I mean I think that we're going to dramatically simplify our customers lives, right? A thing that we focus on at Snowflake is relentless customer innovation, so we can make their lives better, so I mean frankly we talk to customers like, "Wait, I can do all this? Wait, are you sure that I'll be able to do this?" And we walk through what we can do, and what we can't do, and they really are like, "Wow, this could just dramatically simplify our lives and wait, what could we do with our data here?" And so, I think with the announcement of Unistore, and also all the Native app stuff that we're announcing today, I think we're really trying to enable customers and app developers there to think about, and being able to leverage Snowflake as their transactional system, the system of source, so I mean, I'm super excited about this, I came to Snowflake to work on this and I'm like, "Can't believe we get to talk about it." >> How do you, how, how? How does this work? What's the secret sauce behind it? Is it architecture or is it? >> Yeah, so I mean I think a big part of it is the architecture that we chose, so you know number one, a key product philosophy that we have at Snowflake is we have one product, we don't have many, we don't put the onus of complexity onto our customers and so building that into Snowflake is actually really hard, so underlying Hybrid Tables, which is the feature that powers Unistore is a row storage engine, a row-based storage engine, right? And then data is asynchronously copied over into a colander format and what this provides, because it's just another table that's deeply integrated with Snowflake is the compiler's completely aware of this, so you can write a query that spans multiple tables and take advantage of it, and we'll take over all the complexity, whether it needs to be a fast response to a single-row lookup, or it needs to aggregate and scan a ton of data, we'll make sure that we choose the right thing and provide you with the best performance that we have- >> You built that intelligence inside of that? >> Completely built in and amazing, but provided in a very simple fashion. >> You said you came to Snowflake to do this? How long ago was that? >> I came here a little over a year and a half. >> Okay, and had they started working on this obviously beforehand, or at least envisioning it, right? >> Yeah, this I mean, this is absolutely incredible, I have been working on this now for a year and a half, some of the team members have been working on it for more and it's incredible to finally be able to talk to customers and everybody about it, and for them to tell us what they're trying to do. I've already talked to a bunch of customers like, "Well wait, I could do this, or this, what about this scenario?" And it's awesome to hear their requirements, right? The thing that's been most amazing and you'll hear it in the talk tomorrow with Adobe who's been a great customer is like, "Customers give us insanely hard requirements." And what I love about this company is not, "Well, you know it's easier to do it this way." It's like, "No, how can we actually make their life easier?" And so, we really focus on doing that with Snowflake. >> And that's one of the things Frank talked about this morning with that mission alignment being critical there. So, it's in private preview now, when can folks expect to get their hands on it? >> Well, we don't have a date right now we're talking about, but you can go signup to be notified of the public preview when we get there, I think it's like snowflake.com/try-unistore, but we'll publish that later and you know if you're interested in the private preview, talk to your account team and we'll see if we can get you in. >> Carl, thank you so much for joining Dave and me in an action-packed 15 minutes, talking about the power of Unistore, what it's going to enable organizations to do and it sounds like you're tapping the surface, there's just so much more innovation that's to come, you're going to have to come back. >> Yes, that sounds awesome, thank you so much. >> Our pleasure. For Carl and Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching theCUBE's live coverage of Snowflake Summit '22 from the show floor in Las Vegas, we're going to be right back with our next guest. (calm music)
SUMMARY :
in the next 10 minutes with you, Oh, thank you so much for having me, and now, you have your transactional data, and that's what Hybrid and then they started to look at, and have that single platform and move them over to leverage Snowflake, and actually join it with my and to use the term you used HTAP, right? and leverage the power of the data cloud and I'm super excited to see what they do. the data stack if you will separate and being able to leverage Snowflake and amazing, and a half. and for them to tell us And that's one of the things and you know if you're interested and it sounds like you're Yes, that sounds awesome, and Dave Vellante,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Perry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adobe | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Unistore | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
a year and a half | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first phase | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | TITLE | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.98+ |
fiscal 23Q1 | DATE | 0.98+ |
one product | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Snowflake Summit '22 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
snowflake.com/try-unistore | OTHER | 0.97+ |
two worlds | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Unistore Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
single platform | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
over a year and a half | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
394 million | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.93+ |
one step | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Las Vegas, | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
Hybrid Tables | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
single-row | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Snowflake Summit 2022 | EVENT | 0.89+ |
85% growth | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
tons | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
single day | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
number one | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
years ago | DATE | 0.85+ |
thousands of folks | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Hybrid Tables | TITLE | 0.81+ |
Adobe Campaign Platform | TITLE | 0.79+ |
single row | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
phase three | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
Campaign Platform | TITLE | 0.76+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
Caesars Forum | LOCATION | 0.72+ |
Venkat Venkataramani, Rockset & Carl Sjogreen, Seesaw | AWS Startup Showcase
(mid tempo digital music) >> Welcome to today's session of theCUBE' presentation of the AWS startup showcase. This is New Breakthroughs and DevOps, Data Analytics, and Cloud Management Tools. The segment is featuring Rockset and we're going to be talking about data analytics. I'm your host, Lisa Martin, and today I'm joined by one of our alumni, Venkat Venkataramani, the co-founder and CEO of Rockset, and Carl Sjogreen, the co-founder and CPO of Seesaw Learning. We're going to be talking about the fast path to real-time analytics at Seesaw. Guys, Thanks so much for joining me today. >> Thanks for having us >> Thank you for having us. >> Carl, let's go ahead and start with you. Give us an overview of Seesaw. >> Yeah, so Seesaw is a platform that brings educators, students, and families together to create engaging and learning experiences. We're really focused on elementary aged students, and have a suite of creative tools and engaging learning activities that helps get their learning and ideas out into the world and share that with family members. >> And this is used by over 10 million teachers and students and family members across 75% of the schools in the US and 150 countries. So you've got a great big global presence. >> Yeah, it's really an honor to serve so many teachers and students and families. >> I can imagine even more so now with the remote learning being such a huge focus for millions and millions across the country. Carl, let's go ahead and get the backstory. Let's talk about data. You've a ton of data on how your product is being used across millions of data points. Talk to me about the data goals that you set prior to using Rockset. >> Yeah, so, as you can imagine with that many users interacting with Seesaw, we have all sorts of information about how the product is being used, which schools, which districts, what those usage patterns look like. And before we started working with Rockset, a lot of data infrastructure was really custom built and cobbled together a bit over the years. We had a bunch of batch jobs processing data, we were using some tools, like Athena, to make that data visible to our internal customers. But we had a very sort disorganized data infrastructure that really as we've grown, we realized was getting in the way of helping our sales and marketing and support and customer success teams, really service our customers in the way that we wanted to past. >> So operationalizing that data to better serve internal users like sales and marketing, as well as your customers. Give me a picture, Carl, of those key technology challenges that you knew you needed to solve. >> Yeah, well, at the simplest level, just understanding, how an individual school or district is using Seesaw, where they're seeing success, where they need help, is a critical question for our customer support teams and frankly for our school and district partners. a lot of what they're asking us for is data about how Seesaw is being used in their school, so that they can help target interventions, They can understand where there is an opportunity to double down on where they are seeing success. >> Now, before you found Rockset, you did consider a more traditional data warehouse approach, but decided against it. Talk to me about the decision why was a traditional data warehouse not the right approach? >> Well, one of the key drivers is that, we are heavy users of DynamoDB. That's our main data store and has been tremendous aid in our scaling. Last year we scaled with the transition to remote learning, most of our metrics by, 10X and Dynamo didn't skip a beat, it was fantastic in that environment. But when we started really thinking about how to build a data infrastructure on top of it, using a sort of traditional data warehouse, a traditional ETL pipeline, it wasn't going to require a fair amount of work for us to really build that out on our own on top of Dynamo. And one of the key advantages of Rockset was that it was basically plug and play for our Dynamo instance. We turned Rockset on, connected it to our DynamoDB and were able within hours to start querying that data in ways that we hadn't before. >> Venkat let's bring you into the conversation. Let's talk about the problems that you're solving for Seesaw and also the complimentary relationship that you have with DynamoDB. >> Definitely, I think, Seesaw, big fan of the product. We have two kids in elementary school that are active users, so it's a pleasure to partner with Seesaw here. If you really think about what they're asking for, what Carl's vision was for their data stack. The way we look at is business observability. They have many customers and they want to make sure that they're doing the right thing and servicing them better. And all of their data is in a very scalable, large scale, no SEQUEL store like DynamoDB. So it makes it very easy for you to build applications, but it's very, very hard to do analytics on it. Rockset had comes with all batteries included, including real-time data connectors, with Amazon DynamoDB. And so literally you can just point Rockset at any of your Dynamo tables, even though it's a no SEQUEL store, Rockset will in real time replicate the data and automatically convert them into fast SEQUEL tables for you to do analytics on. And so within one to two seconds of data getting modified or new data arriving in DynamoDB from your application, within one to two seconds, it's available for query processing in Rockset with full feature SEQUEL. And not just that, I think another very important aspect that was very important for Seesaw is not just that they wanted me to do batch analytics. They wanted their analytics to be interactive because a lot of the time we just say something is wrong. It's good to know that, but oftentimes you have a lot more followup questions. Why is it wrong? When did it go wrong? Is it a particular release that we did? Is it something specific to the school district? Are they trying to use some part of the product more than other parts of the product and struggling with it? Or anything like that. It's really, I think it comes down to Seesaw's and Carl's vision of what that data stack should serve and how we can use that to better serve the customers. And Rockset's indexing technology, and whatnot allows you to not only get real-time in terms of data freshness, but also the interactivity that comes in ad-hoc drilling down and slicing and dicing kind of analytics that is just our bread and butter . And so that is really how I see not only us partnering with Seesaw and allowing them to get the business observerbility they care about, but also compliment Dynamo transactional databases that are massively scalable, born in the cloud, like DynamoDB. >> Carl talked to me about that complimentary relationship that Venkat just walked us through and how that is really critical to what you're trying to deliver at Seesaw. >> Yeah, well, just to reiterate what Venkat said, I think we have so much data that any question you ask about it, immediately leads to five other questions about it. We have a very seasonal business as one example. Obviously in the summertime when kids aren't in school, we have very different usage patterns, then during this time right now is our critical back to school season versus a steady state, maybe in the middle of the school year. And so really understanding how data is trending over time, how it compares year over year, what might be driving those things, is something that frankly we just haven't had the tools to really dig into. There's a lot about that, that we are still beginning to understand and dig into more. And so this iterative exploration of data is incredibly powerful to expose to our product team, our sales and marketing teams to really understand where Seesaw's working and where we still have work do with our customers. And that's so critical to us doing a good job for schools in districts. >> And how long have you been using Rockset, Carl? >> It's about six months now, maybe a little bit longer. >> Okay, so during the pandemic. So talk to me a little bit about in the last 18 months, where we saw the massive overnight transition to remote learning and there's still a lot of places that are in that or a hybrid environment. How critical was it to have Rockset to fuel real-time analytics interactivity, particularly in a very challenging last 18 month time period? >> The last 18 months have been hard for everyone, but I think have hit teachers and schools maybe harder than anyone, they have been struggling with. And then, overnight transition to remote learning challenges of returning to the classroom hybrid learning, teachers and schools are being asked to stretch in ways they have never been stretched before. And so, our real focus last year was in doing whatever we could to help them manage those transitions. And data around student attendance in a remote learning situation, data around which kids were completing lessons and which kids weren't, was really critical data to provide to our customers. And a lot of our data infrastructure had to be built out to support answering those questions in this really crazy time for schools. >> I want to talk about the data set, but I'd like to go back to Venkat 'cause what's interesting about this story is Seesaw is a customer of Rockset, Venkat, is a customer of Seesaw. Talk to me Venkat about how this has been helpful in the remote learning that your kids have been going through the last year and a half. >> Absolutely. I have two sons, nine and ten year olds, and they are in fourth and fifth grade now. And I still remember when I told them that Seesaw is considering using Rockset for the analytics, they were thrilled, they were overjoyed because finally they understood what I do for a living. (chuckling) And so that was really amazing. I think, it was a fantastic dual because for the first time I actually understood what kids do at school. I think every week at the end of the week, we would use Seesaw to just go look at, "Hey, well, let's see what you did last week." And we would see not only what the prompts and what the children were doing in the classroom, but also the comments from the educators, and then they comment back. And then we were like, "Hey, this is not how you speak to an educators." So it was really amazing to actually go through that, and so we are very, very big fans of the product, we really look forward to using it, whether it is remote learning or not, we try to use it as a family, me, my wife and the kids, as much as possible. And it's a very constant topic of conversation, every week when we are working with the kids and seeing how we can help them. >> So from an observability perspective, it sounds like it's giving parents and teachers that visibility that really without it, you don't get. >> That's absolutely correct . I think the product itself is about making connections, giving people more visibility into things that are constantly happening, but you're not in the know. Like, before Seesaw, I used to ask the kids, "How was school today? "what happened in the class?" And they'll say, "It was okay." It would be a very short answer, it wouldn't really have the depth that we are able to get from Seesaw. So, absolutely. And so it's only right that, that level of observability and that level of... Is also available for their business teams, the support teams so that they can also service all the organizations that Seesaw's working with, not only the parents and the educators and the students that are actually using the product. >> Carl, let's talk about that data stack And then I'm going to open the can on some of those impacts that it's making to your internal folks. We talked about DynamoDB, but give me an visual audio, visual picture of the data stack. >> Yeah. So, we use DynamoDB as our database of record. We're now in the process of centralizing all of our analytics into Rockset. So that rather than having different BaaS jobs in different systems, querying that data in different ways, trying to really set Rockset up as the source of truth for analytics on top of Dynamo. And then on top of Rockset, exposing that data, both to internal customers for that interactive iterative SEQUEL style queries, but also bridging that data into the other systems our business users use. So Salesforce, for example, is a big internal tool and have that data now piped into Salesforce so that a sales rep can run a report on a prospect to reach out to, or a customer that needs help getting started with Seesaw. And it's all plumbed through the Rockset infrastructure. >> From an outcome standpoint, So I mentioned sales and marketing getting that visibility, being able to act on real time data, how has it impacted sales in the last year and a half? six months rather since , it's now since months using it. >> Well, I don't know if I can draw a direct line between those things, but it's been a very busy year for Seesaw, as schools have transitioned to remote learning. And our business is really largely driven by teachers discovering our free product, finding it valuable in their classroom, and then asking their school or district leadership to purchase a school wide subscription. It's a very bottoms up sales motion. And so data on where teachers are starting to use Seesaw is the key input into our sales and marketing discussions with schools and districts. And so understanding that data quickly in real time is a key part of our sales strategy and a key part of how we grow at Seesaw over time. >> And it sounds like Rockset is empowering those users, the sales and marketing folks to really fine tune their interactions with existing customers, prospective customers. And I imagine you on the product side in terms of tuning the product. What are some of the things Carl that you've learned in the last six months that have helped you make better decisions on what you want Seesaw to deliver in the future? >> Well, one of the things that I think has been really interesting is how usage patterns have changed between the classroom and remote learning. We saw per student usage of Seesaw increased dramatically over the past year, and really understanding what that means for how the product needs to evolve to better meet teacher needs, to help organize that information, since it's now a lot more of it, really helped motivate our product roadmap over the last year. We launched a new progress dashboard that helps teachers get an added glance view of what's happening in their classroom. That was really in direct response to the changing usage patterns, that we were able to understand with better insights into data. >> And those insights allow you to pivot and iterate on the product. Venkat I want to just go back to the AWS relationship for a second. You both talked about the complimentary nature of Rockset and DynamoDB. Here we are at the AWS Startup Showcase. Venkat just give the audience a little overview of the partnership that you guys have with AWS. >> Rockset fully runs on AWS, so we are customer of AWS. We are also a partner. There are lots of amazing cloud data products that AWS has, including DynamoDB or AWS Kinesis. And so one with which we have built in integrations. So if you're managing data in AWS, we compliment and we can provide, very, very fast interactive real-time analytics on all of your datasets. So the partnership has been wonderful, we're very excited to be in the Startup Showcase. And so I hope this continuous for years to come. >> Let's talk about the synergies between a Rockset and Seesaw for a second. I know we talked about the huge value of real time analytics, especially in today's world, where we've learned many things in the last year and a half, including that real-time analytics is no longer a nice to have for a lot of industries, 'cause I think Carl as you said, if you can't get access to the data, then there's questions we can't ask. Or we can't iterate on operations, if we wait seconds for every query to load, then there's questions we can't ask. Talk to me Venkat, about how Rockset is benefiting from what you're learning from Seesaw's usage of the technology? >> Absolutely. I mean, if you go to the first part of the question on why do businesses really go after real time. What is the drive here? You might have heard the phrase, the world is going from batch to real-time. What does it really mean? What's the driving factor there? Our take on it is, I think it's about accelerating growth. Seesaw's product being amazing and it'll continue to grow, it'll continue to be a very, very important product in the world. With or without Rockset, that will be true. The way we look at once they have real-time business observability, is that inherent growth that they have, they can reach more people, they can put their product in the hands of more and more people, they can iterate faster. And at the end of the day, it is really about having this very interesting platform, very interesting architecture to really make a lot more data driven decisions and iterate much more quickly. And so in batch analytics, if you were able to make, let's say five decisions a quarter, in real time analytics you can make five decisions a day. So that's how we look at it. So that is really, I think, what is the underpinnings of why the world is going from batch to real time. And what have we learned from having a Seesaw as a customer? I think Seesaw has probably one of the largest DynamoDB installations that we have looked at. I think, we're talking about billions and billions of records, even though they have tens of millions of active users. And so I think it has been an incredible partnership working with them closely, and they have had a tremendous amount of input on our product roadmap and some of that like role-based access control and other things have already being a part of the product, thanks to the continuous feedback we get from their team. So we're delighted about this partnership and I am sure there's more input that they have, that we cannot wait to incorporate in our roadmap. >> I imagine Venkat as well, you as the parent user and your kids, you probably have some input that goes to the Seesaw side. So this seems like a very synergistic relationship. Carl, a couple more questions for you. I'd love to know how in this... Here we are kind of back to school timeframe, We've got a lot of students coming back, they're still remote learning. What are some of the things that you're excited about for this next school year that do you think Rockset is really going to fuel or power for Seesaw? >> Yeah, well, I think schools are navigating yet another transition now, from a world of remote learning to a world of back to the classroom. But back to the classroom feels very different than it does at any other back to school timeframe. Many of our users are in first or second grade. We serve early elementary age ranges and some of those students have never been in a classroom before. They are entering second grade and never having been at school. And that's hard. That's a hard transition for teachers in schools to make. And so as a partner to those schools, we want to do everything we can to help them manage that transition, in general and with Seesaw in particular. And the more we can understand how they're using Seesaw, where they're struggling with Seesaw, as part of that transition, the more we can be a good partner to them and help them really get the most value out of Seesaw, in this new world that we're living in, which is sort of like normal, and in many ways not. We are still not back to normal as far as schools are concerned. >> I'm sure though, the partnership that you provide to the teachers and the students can be a game changer in these, and still navigating some very uncertain times. Carl, last question for you. I want you to point folks to where they can go to learn more about Seesaw, and how for all those parents watching, they might be able to use this with their families. >> Yeah, well, seesaw.me is our website, and you can go to seesaw.me and learn more about Seesaw, and if any of this sounds interesting, ask your teacher, if they're not using Seesaw, to give it a look. >> Seesaw.me, excellent. Venkat, same question for you. Where do you want folks to go to learn more about Rockset and its capabilities? >> Rockset.com is our website. There is a free trial for... $300 worth of free trial credits. It's a self service platform, you don't need to talk to anybody, all the pricing and everything is out there. So, if real-time analytics and modernizing your data stack is on your roadmap, go give it a spin. >> Excellent guys. Thanks so much for joining me today, talking about real-time analytics, how it's really empowering both the data companies and the users to be able to navigate in challenging waters. Venkat, thank you, Carl, thank you for joining us. >> Thanks everyone. >> Thanks Lisa. >> For my guests, this has been our coverage of the AWS Startup Showcase, New Breakthroughs in DevOps, Data Analytics and Cloud Management Tools. I am Lisa Martin. Thanks for watching. (mid tempo music)
SUMMARY :
the fast path to real-time and start with you. out into the world and share across 75% of the schools to serve so many teachers and get the backstory. in the way that we wanted to past. that you knew you needed to solve. to double down on where Talk to me about the decision And one of the key advantages of Rockset that you have with DynamoDB. because a lot of the time we and how that is really critical is our critical back to school season It's about six months now, in the last 18 months, where we saw challenges of returning to the classroom in the remote learning And so that was really amazing. that visibility that really and the students that are And then I'm going to open the can and have that data now in the last year and a half? is the key input into our And I imagine you on the product side for how the product needs to evolve that you guys have with AWS. in the Startup Showcase. in the last year and a half, and it'll continue to grow, that goes to the Seesaw side. And the more we can understand the partnership that you provide and if any of this sounds interesting, to learn more about Rockset all the pricing and both the data companies and the users of the AWS Startup Showcase,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Venkat Venkataramani | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Sjogreen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Venkat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Seesaw | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rockset | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$300 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Venkat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two kids | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two seconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tens of millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five decisions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
second grade | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five other questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dynamo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ten year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
150 countries | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
billions | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two sons | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Carl Olofson, IDC | Postgres Vision 2021
>> Narrator: From around the globe. It's theCUBE with digital coverage of Postgres vision 2021 brought to you by EDB. >> Welcome back to Postgres Vision 21. My name is Dave Vellante. We're thrilled to welcome Carl Olofsen to theCUBE. Carl is a research vice president at IDC focused on data management. The long-time database analyst is the technologist and market observer. Carl, good to see you again. >> Thanks Dave. Glad to be here. >> All right. Let's let's get into it. Let's talk about, let's go right to the, to the source the open source database space. You know, how, what changes have you seen over the last couple of years in that marketplace? >> Well, this is a dynamic area and it's continuing to evolve. When we first saw the initial open source products like mysQl and PostgreSQL on the early days they were very limited in terms of functionality. They were espoused largely by sort of true believers. You know, people who said everything should be open source. And we saw that mainly they were being used for what I would call rather prosaic database applications. But as time has gone by they both of these products improve. Now there's one key difference, of course, which is a mySQL is company owned open source. So the IP belongs to Oracle corporation. Whereas PostgreSQL is community open source, which means that the IP belongs to the PostgreSQL community. And that can have a big difference in terms of things like licensing and so forth, which really matters now that we're coming into the cloud space because as open-source products moving into the cloud space the revenue model is based on subscriptions. And of course they are always based on subscription to open source cause you don't charge for the license. So what you charge for its support, but in the cloud what you can do is you can set up a database service, excuse me, a database service and then you charge for that service. And if it's open source or it's not open source that actually doesn't matter to the user. If you see what that I mean because they still are paying a subscription fee for a service and they get the service. The main difference between the two types is that if you're a commercial provider of PostgreSQL like enterprise DB, you don't have control over where it goes and you don't have control over the IP and how people use it in different ways. Whereas Oracle owns mySQL so they have a lot more control and they can do things to it on their own. They don't have to consult the community. Now there's also, non-relational open source including MongoDB. And as you may be aware, MongoDB has changed their license. So that it's not possible for third party to offer Mongo DB as a complete managed database service without paying a license fee to MongoDB for that. And that's because they own the IP too. And we're going to see a lot more of this sort of thing. I have conversations with open source all the time and they are getting a little concerned that it has become possible for somebody to simply take their technology, make a lot of money off that. And no money goes back to the community. No money goes back to the IRS. It's a company it's just stays with the supplier. So I think, you know it'll be interesting to see how all this is over time. >> So you're suggesting that the Postgres model then is, is I guess I'll use the word cleaner. And so that feels like it's a it's a benefit or is it a two-edged sword kind of thing? I mean, you were saying before, you know a company controls the IP so they could do things without having to go to the community. So maybe they can do things faster. But at the other hand like you said, you get handcuffed. You think you're going to be able to get a, you know a managed service, but then all of a sudden you're not and the rules change midstream saying it, am I correct? That Postgres, the model is cleaner for the customer? >> Well, you know, I mean, a lot of my friends who are in the open source community don't even consider company owned open source to be true open source because the IP is controlled by a company, not by a community. >> Dave: Right >> So from that perspective certainly Postgres SQL is considered, I don't know if you want to use the word cleaner or more pure or something along those lines, but also because of that the nature of community open source it can be used in many different ways. And so we see Postgres popping up all over the place sometimes partially and sometimes altogether, in other words, a service, a cloud service, we'll take a piece of Postgres and stick it on top of their own technology and offer it. And the reason they do that is they know there are a lot of developers out there who already know how to code for Postgres. So they are immediately first-class users of the service that they're offering. >> So, talk a little bit more about what you're seeing. You just mentioned a lot of different use cases. That's interesting. I didn't realize that was, that was happening. The, what are you seeing in terms of adoption in let's say the last 18, 24 months specific to Postgres? >> Yeah, we're seeing a fair amount of adoption in especially in the middle market. And of course there is rapid adoption in the tech sector. Now, why would that be? Well it's because they have armies of technologists. Who know how to program this stuff. You know, when you, you know, a lot of them will use PostgreSQL without a contract without a support contract, they'll just support themselves. And they can do that because they have the technicians who are capable of doing it. Most regular businesses can't do that. They don't have the staff so they need that support contract. And so that's where a company like enterpriseDB comes. I mentioned them only because they're the leading supplier Postgres to all their other suppliers. >> I was talking to Josh Burgers, red hat and he was, you know, he had just come off a Cubacon and he was explaining kind of what's happening in that community. Big focus of course on security and the whole, you know, so-called shift left. We were having a good discussion about, you know when does it make sense to use, you know Postgres in a container environment should you use Postgres and Kubernetes and he sort of suggested that things have rapidly evolved. There's still, you know, considerations but what are you seeing in terms of the adoption of microservices architectures containers, generally Kubernetes how has that affected the use of things like postsgres? >> So those are all different things or need to be kind of custody. >> Pick your favorite. >> They're related then. So microservices, the microservice concept is that you take an application break it up into little pieces and each one becomes a microservice that's invoked through an API. And then you have this whole structure API system that you use to drive the application and they run. They typically, they run in containers usually Kubernetes govern containers but the reason you do this and this is basically a efficiency because especially in the cloud, you want only to pay for what you use. So when you're running a microservice based application. Applications have lots of little pieces when something needs to be done, microservice fires up it does the thing that needs to be done. It goes away. You only pay for that fraction of a second that the microservice is running. Whereas in a conventional application you load this big heavyweight application. It does stop. It sets some weights with things and does more stuff and sits and waits for things. And you pay for compute for that entire period. So it's much more cost effective to use a microservices application. The thing is that microservice, the concept of microservices is based on the idea that the code is stateless but database code isn't stateless cause it has its attraction to the database which is the ultimate kind of like stateful environment right? So it's a tricky business. Most database technologies that are claimed to be container-based actually run in containers the way they run in servers. In other words, they're not microservice-based they do run in containers. And the reason they're doing that is for portability so that you can deploy them anywhere and you can move them around. But you know deploying a microservice based database is, well, it's it's a big technical project. I mean, that is hard to do. >> Right and so talk about, I mean again we're talking to Josh it was clear that that Kubernetes has evolved, you know quite rapidly at the same time there were cautions. In other words, he would say I think suggested things like, you know, there were known at one point, there were known, you know flaws and known bugs that ship the code that's been been remediated or moderated in terms of that practice but still there's there's considerations just in terms of the frequency of updates. I think he gave the example of when was the last time you know, JVM got, you know, overhauled. And so what kind of considerations should customers think about when considering them, they want the Kubernetes they want the flexibility and the agility but at the same time, if they're going to put it production, they've got to be careful, right? >> Yeah, I think you need to make sure you're using you're using functions that are well-established, you know you wouldn't want to put something into production that's new. They say, oh, here's a new, here's a new operation. Let's try that. And then, you know, you get in trouble. So you want to deal conservative that way you know, Kubernetes is open-source so and the updates and the testing and all that follows a rather slow formal process, you know from the time that the submission comes in to the time that it goes out, whereas you mentioned JVMs JV, but it was owned by Oracle. And so JVMs are managed like products. Now there's a whole sort of legal thing I don't want to get into it as to whether it's legal. They claim it's not libero third parties to build JVMs without paying a licensing. I don't want to talk about that, but it's based on a very state that has a very stable base, you know whereas this area of Kubernetes and govern containers is still rapidly evolving but this is like any technology, right? I mean, when you, if you're going to commit your enterprise to functions that run on an emerging technology then you are accepting some risk. You know, that there's no question about it. >> So we talked about the cloud earlier and the whole trend toward managed services. I mean, how does that specifically apply to Postgres? You can kind of imagine like a sidecar, a little bit of Postgres mixed in with, you know, other services. So what do you see and what do you, what's your telescope say in terms of the the Postgres adoption cloud? How do you see that progressing? >> I think there's a lot of potential. There's a lot of potential there. I think we are nowhere near the option that it should be able to achieve. I say that because for one thing, even though we analyze the future at IDC, that doesn't mean we actually know the future. So I can't say what its adoption will be but I can say that there's a lot of potential there. There's a tremendous number of Postgres developers out there. So there's a huge potential for adoption. And especially in cloud adoption, the main thing that would help that is independent. And I know that enterpriseDB has one independent a managed cloud service. So I think they do. >> Yeah I think so. >> But you know, why do I say that? I say that because alternatives these days there are some small companies that maybe they'll survive and maybe they won't, but that, you know, do you want to get involved with them or the cloud platform providers, but if you use their Postgres you're locked into that cloud platform. You know, if you use Amazon, go press on RDS, right? You're not, you become quickly locked in because you're starting using all the AWS tools that surround it to build and manage your application. And then you can't move. If you see what I mean. >> Dave: Yeah . >> They have have an RDS labor Aurora, and this is actually one of the things that it's really just a thin layer of Postgres interaction code underneath Aurora is their own product. so that's an even deeper level of commitment. >> So what has to happen for, so obviously cloud, you know, big trend. So the Postgres community then adopts the code base for the cloud. Obviously EDB has, you know hundreds of developers contributing to that, but so what does that mean to be able to run in the cloud? Is that making it cloud native? Is that extensions? Is it, you know, what technically has to occur and what has occurred and how mature is it? >> Well, so smaller user organizations are able to migrate fairly quickly cloud because most of their applications are you know, commercially purchased. They're like factories applications. When they move to the cloud, they get the SAS one and often the SAS equivalent runs on Postgres. So that's just fine. Larger enterprises are a real mess. If you've ever been in a large enterprise data center you know what I'm talking about? It's just, there's just servers and storage everywhere. There's, all these applications, databases connections. They are not moving to the cloud anytime soon. But what they are doing is setting up things like private cloud environments and applying in there. And this is a place where if you're thinking about moving to something like a Postgres you know most of these enterprises use the big commercial databases. Oracle SQLserver DB two and so forth. If you're thinking of moving from that to a a PostgreSQL development say, then the smart thing to do would be first to do all your work in the private cloud where you'd have complete control over the environment. It also makes sense still to have a commercial support contract from a vendor that you trust, because I've said this again, unless you are, you know, Cisco or somebody, you know, some super tech company that's got all the technicians you need to do the work. You really don't want to take on that level of risk. If you see that, I mean. Another advantage to working with a supplier, a support supplier, especially if you have a close, intimate relationship is they will speed your security patches on a regular basis which is really important these days, because data security is as you know, a growing concern all over the place. >> So let's stay on the skillsets for a minute. Where do you see the gaps within enterprises? What kind of expertise you mentioned, you know support contracts, what are the types of things that a customer should look for in terms of the the expertise to apply to supporting Postgres databases? >> Well, obviously you want them to do the basics that any software company does, right? You want them to provide you with regular updates and binary form that you can load and, you know test and run. You want to have the you know, 24 hour hotline you know, telephone support, all that kind of thing. I think it's also important to have a solid ability on the part of the vendor that you're working with to provide you with advice and counseling as you, especially, if you're migrating from another technology, help your people convert from what they were using to what they're going to be using. So those are all aspects that I would look for in a vendor for supporting a product like PostgreSQL. >> When you think about the migration to the cloud, you know of course Amazon talks a lot about cloud migration. They have a lot of tooling associated with that. >> Carl: Right. >> But when you step back and look at it it did to a point earlier, I mean a lot of the hardcore mission, critical stuff isn't going to move it, hasn't moved, but a lot of the fat middle, you know, is, are good candidates for it. >> Carl: Right. >> How do you think about that? And how do you look at that? I mean, obviously Oracle is trying to shove everything into OCI and they're, you know, they're all in because they realized that could make a lot of money doing that. But what do you, what are the sort of parameters that we should think about when considering that kind of migration, moving a legacy database into the cloud? >> Well, it has to be done piecemeal. You're not going to be able to do it all at once. You know, if you have hundreds of applications, you're not just you don't even want to, you know, it's a good time to take you into it. And what you've got running, ask yourself are these applications really serving the business interests today and will they in the future or is this a good time to maybe consider something else? Even if you have a packaged application, there might be one that is more aligned with your future goals. So it's important to do that. Look at your data integration, try to simplify it. You know, most data integration that most companies has done piecemeal project by project. They don't reference each other. So you have this chaos of ETL jobs and transformation rules and things like that that are just, you know, even difficult to manage. Now, just forget about any kind of migration or transformation considerations, just trying to run it now is becoming increasingly difficult. You know, maybe you want to change your strategy for doing data integration. Maybe you want to consolidate you want to put more data in one database. I'm not an advocate of the idea that you can put all application data in one database by the way, we know from bitter experience that doesn't work, but we can be rational about the kinds of databases that we use and how they sit together. >> Well, I mean, you've been following this for a long time and you saw the sort of rise and fall of the big data meme. And you know, this idea that you can shove everything into a single place, have a single version of the truth. It's like, it's just never seemed to happen. >> Carl: Right. >> So, you know, Postgres has been around a long time. It's evolved. I mean, I remember when, you know, VMware's ascendancy and people are like, okay, should I, you know should I virtualize my Postgres database is your, you know similar conversations that we were having earlier about Kubernetes. You've seen the move to the cloud. We're going to have this conversation about the edge at some point in time. So what's your outlook for Postgres, the Postgres community and, you know database market overall? >> Well, I really think the future for database growth is in the cloud. That's what all the data we're looking at and the case that's what our recent surveys indicate. As I said before, the rate of change depends on the size of the enterprise. Smaller advices are moving rapidly, large enterprises much more slowly and cautiously for the very simple reason that it's a very complex proposition. And also in some cases, they're wondering if they can move certain data or will they be violating your some sort of regulatory constraint or contractual issue. So they need to deal with those things too. That's why the private cloud is the perfect place to get started and get technology all lined up storing your data center is still under your control no legal issues there, but you can start, you know converting your applications to micro-service architected applications running in containers. You can start replacing your database servers with ones that can run in a container environment and maybe in the future, maybe hope that in the future, some of those will actually also be able to run as microservices. I don't think it's impossible but it just involves programming the database server in a very different way than we've done in the past. But you do those things. You can do those things under your own control over time in your own dataset. And then you reach a point where you want to take the elements of your application environment and say, what pieces of this, can I move to the cloud without creating disruption and issues regarding things like data egress and latency from cloud to data center and that kind of thing. And prepare for that. And then you're doing the step wise and then you start converting in a stepwise manner. I think ultimately it just makes so much sense to be in the cloud that the cloud vendors have economies of scale. They can deploy large numbers of servers and storage systems to satisfy the needs of large numbers of customers and create, you know great considerable savings. Some of which of course becomes their profit which is what's due to them. And some of that comes back to the users. So that's what I expect. We're going to see. And oh gosh, I would say that starting from about three years from now the larger enterprises start making their move and then you'll really start to see changes in the numbers in terms of cloud and cloud revenue. >> Great stuff, Carl, thank you for that. So any cool research you're working on lately, how you're spending your your work time, anything you want to plug? >> Well, working a lot on just as these questions, you know cloud migration is a hot topic, another which is really sort of off the subject. And what we've been talking about is graph database which I've been doing a fair amount of research into. I think that's going to be really important in the coming years and really, you know working with my colleagues in a project called the future of intelligence which looks at all the different related elements not just database, data integration but artificial intelligence, data communications and so on and so forth and how they come together to create a more intelligent enterprise. And that's a major initiative that I see. It's one of the, we call the future of initiatives. >> Great, Carls, thanks so much for coming back to theCUBE. It's great to have you, man. I appreciate it. >> Well, I enjoyed it. Now I have to do it again sometime. >> All right you got it. All right thank you everybody for watching theCUBEs. Continuous coverage of Postgres vision 21. This is Dave Vellante keep it right there. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by EDB. Carl, good to see you again. You know, how, what changes have you seen that the IP belongs to I mean, you were saying before, you know Well, you know, I mean, but also because of that the The, what are you seeing especially in the middle market. and he was, you know, he or need to be kind of custody. but the reason you do this I think suggested things like, you know, And then, you know, you get in trouble. So what do you see and what do you, And I know that enterpriseDB and maybe they won't, but that, you know, that it's really just a thin so obviously cloud, you know, big trend. you know what I'm talking about? the expertise to apply to and binary form that you can load and, migration to the cloud, you know but a lot of the fat middle, you know, is, And how do you look at that? it's a good time to take you into it. And you know, this idea that the Postgres community and, you know And some of that comes back to the users. anything you want to plug? and really, you know for coming back to theCUBE. Now I have to do it again sometime. All right you got it.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
George | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steven | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Josh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bill | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Olofsen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Bill McDermott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Klara | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Orlando | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Klara Young | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Steven Cox | PERSON | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bill Miller | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Carl Olofson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
17 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
24 hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
23,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1,000 cats | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two types | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Coca-Cola | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
60 industries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
26 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5X | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Postgres | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HANA | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
360 view | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sapphire | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
more than 20,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one platform | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Carls | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IDC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one database | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
NetApp | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
mySQL | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Josh Burgers | PERSON | 0.98+ |
tonight | DATE | 0.98+ |
one time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
EDB | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
SAP | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Carl Holzhauer, Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | Microsoft Ignite 2019
>>Live from Orlando, Florida. It's the cube covering Microsoft ignite. Brought to you by Cohesity. >>Good morning cube land and welcome back to the cubes live coverage of Microsoft ignite here in Orlando, Florida. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, along with my cohost Stu Miniman. We are joined by Carl holes, our, he is the supervisor of infrastructure Shumaker loop and Kendrick based in Toledo, Ohio. Thank you so much for coming on the show tomorrow. So tell our viewers first of all a little bit about uh, she make her loop. So Schulich >>is a top 200 law firm in the U S we have seven locations across the country, most of the East coast and we serve as anything from litigation to environmental to legal and things like that. >>Okay. So you and you are the supervisor of infrastructure. >>Yeah, my role there is to make sure anything with plugs and switches keeps working, so. >>All right. And so Carl, tell us a little bit about, you said you've got multiple occasions once that span and to the lawyers tell you everything and how it must be. >>The lawyers definitely have a say in the way things work. We have most of the locations in Florida and the Carolinas and two in Ohio. Okay. >>Um, and you know, with the locations, you know, what are some of the business drivers that you're going on? When I talked to most companies, you know, there's the constant change. Is there M and a happening? Is it growth? What are some of the drivers of your business? >>Oh, for sure it's growth. You know, obviously as time goes on there's more and more cases, more and more legal things have to happen. Lawyers love documents, so we have to store documents, index amend, make sure that they're always available for their use. And then of course, as part of that too, there's, there's legals holds on things, you know, stuff the case that stretches over, you know, five, 10 years. We need to keep that data safe. Yeah. So I would, >>I think that the word compliance is one that you know, all too well. Exactly. Bring us in a little bit to them. Side is, so some of those, you know, what do you have to be concerned about? You know, how many petabytes exabytes of things in years >>I'll have to that. It depends on the kind of case it is and what it involves. Some, some cases, as long as you have the data in some form you're okay. Other cases the data can't change. So we have systems that might be a little older because they, it has to be as it was when we actually had the case come into us. Okay. That's challenging too. So data, when we talked to so many companies, it's, you know, how can I monetize data? How can I do that? Data has to be a slightly different role inside your organization. How, how's that thought of, >> we have to be careful obviously because conflict of interest, you know, we so have to keep data separate in some instances and internally, not everybody can see the same data because there is issues with privacy or hippo or you know, or so on and so forth that they can't see this stuff. So for us, we need to keep it safe more than monetize it. >>So as you said, the lawyers have a, have a big say in how things empower things happen. So how would you describe the approach and mindset of, of Chyulu toward technology and toward cloud-based and new kinds of, to, to store >>and keep data safe? We, our goal is to make sure things are always online. Um, so we kind of tend toward the more, the more tried and true methods of doing things, the bleeding edge doesn't always work for us. So, but we also can't afford to, to lag behind. So we need to find that balance in between somehow to keep things moving, but the same time make sure that things don't go down or offline fraternities. So protecting and backing up your data across a hybrid environment isn't easy. So Ty, and I know you, you are on a panel here at ignite about, uh, backup disasters and how to avoid them. So I'd love to have you talk a little bit about, about how you think about this and then, and how you interview vendors, vendors and decide what's the right solution for your show. >> Every different, I guess a practice inside of law firm has different ways of getting data. They like their programs this way or that way and they're all different. So the hard part for us is how to keep that data always available to them in different systems. So whatever we do has to encompass making sure these all, all these things work, you know, kind of as, as one. So we've used Cohesity to do backups, we've used Xero to do dr mixer always online. >>Okay. And how long have you been using those solutions? I, how did you reach the kind of those decisions? >>Those were brought in? Just as I joined the firm about a year and a half ago. Um, our vendor who we're using is very tight with Cohesity and Xero and said that might be a good idea. And the more I use them, the more I agree with that. And they're all good. >>So you're saying it's your, your CI, your channel partner channel that does, that. They're trusted, they provide your gear, advise you on the software. Because let's be honest, as time goes on, you can't know everything. So you need to somebody that you can trust to bring in and say, Hey, do it this way. Well, yeah, Carl, I mean, I don't know if you caught the day one keynote, but even those of us that watch the industry in DOE, it's, there's no way any of us could keep up at though. So that, that, that's really important. How do you make sure that you know that that's a trusted advisor? You know, what's, what's the kind of the give and take between them? >>I think a lot of that comes down to a gut feeling, right? I you, if you feel slimy when you meet somebody, you know, they don't have your best interests in mind and that's what you want. Not my best interest, but the interest of the firm and of the company. So once you have established those guidelines, you usually can trust what they're saying. And I guess every time you meet them too, you have to reevaluate is this still a good fit? >> So when you comes to backup and recovery, I'd love to hear more about this panel and how you and your colleagues came to conclusions about how here's some, here's some big ones and here's how you can avoid them. So I think for us it was just what worked and what didn't work. You know, we all, all three of us use this stuff day to day. So we found the pitfalls, we found what you should and shouldn't do. And when we share that with the, with the community, we get some good feedback on that. >>So Carl, a year and a half there, any, any specific advice that you'd share? People as to what you've learned? Say I hired pitfalls in there as you know, was it a configuration issue or something went wrong because we know the best intentions and best products out there, so you know, things can get in the way. Yeah, >>definitely. We've learned to keep support clothes. I mean, they're awesome. They know their stuff. There's some things we've had issues with that I wanted to do that it wasn't a good fit or we've ran into some bugs here and there, but they're really responsive and they'll put all the alpha specialists for you and weeks, you know, and things just end up working. >> Alright, so here at the conference, what are some of the conversations that you're having because you are in the legal industry and so not necessarily community college communicating all day with people in the high tech industry. So bring us inside a little, tell us about the conversations you're having, interesting people that you're meeting, things that are sparking your interest. >> It's neat because I've met some people through the panel I was on yesterday and they're asking questions that don't even title legal. You know, they have the same access as we do, but they are just either apply to manufacturing or applied to natural gas or whatever happens to be. Um, and then when you know, meetings from the vendors here, it's interesting too, you know, I'm an illegal mindset now and they say, Hey, what about this? And you go, Oh, that's some game changer. And you know, and all of a sudden you can apply it to your field. >>More sense. Yeah. How about this your first time attending Microsoft ignite? Give us a little bit your impressions, you know, uh, the, the, the good, the bad. And the interesting is it's really >>big. I walked through here Sunday night when when nobody was here. It's like, Oh, this isn't too bad. And then I think I walked 10 miles the first day getting places and it's usually pretty well laid out and unless there's beer or food and everybody kind of goes to it and it's hard to move around. But other than that I think it's pretty cool. So what are the kinds of things you're going to take back? As you said, you are sometimes talking to people who are in a completely different industry with you and they are saying things that spark your interest and spark new ideas. What are the kinds of things you're going to take back to shoe loop when you arrive back in total Toledo, we're trying to look at all these new buzzwords like on new, but like blockchain or AI and how they can help us do our jobs better and serve their attorneys better. Um, is there something that I haven't thought of that blockchain can, can do this >>for us and better than we're doing it now now. So Carl, one of the things we've noticed there, there's a real growth in some of the developer content here as an infrastructure person. And I'm curious your view on that, that that side of the world. >>That is not my strong suit. Obviously I came from a world where that was a big deal and I could learn some things. But as far as my background goes and learning about it, it's kinda over my head. Um, you know, I can get it behind this stuff, talk to automate processes and make things, you know better. But as far as the dev side, I'm kind of going, Hey, no, I know if I get this, but, but there is such a push here for citizens and for citizen developers and to sort of democratize this and say even you can do this, which is awesome and in a way because the more eyes have on something, the better they go. You know I can even if I don't understand something, I can ask the question, Hey, why is this work this way? You go, Oh it shouldn't work this way. >>Let's fix this and and make things better. You know. Anything more about kinda your firm's relationship with Microsoft? So many announcements here. Not, no, not sure if teams has used a in your environment. We are using Skype right now but we have way pushed to go to two teams. So that's going to be a big, big push for us in queue for this year and digging next year and then we're looking at moving to Azure at some point. Getting our stuff up there and making you know to be most effective, faster, better. How do you stay up to date with all of these new announcements and not just here at Microsoft, but even in the larger technology community. You can't stop learning. You can't stop reading. You know? You look at the like the slash dots of the world and you just keep looking at things and some things may make sense. >>Some things I'm like, Oh, that's kind of cool. I'll read it later. All of a sudden it goes, Oh, that's a big idea and we should look at this some more. But again, it's having those trusted people that you know or colleagues that say, Hey, I saw this. I saw that. Take a look at that suit. You think so? I know in your, in your off time, you are an officiant of a number of different sports. I'm curious to hear how you bring what you do as an officiant into your job at shoe loop and the similarities. The differences. In my help desk days, it was a lot easier because I could take the, the end user ratings a lot easier because I will hold nothing personal, but it's neat too. I mean, when you're an official, you have, there's a, there's a way things work. There's a, there's a set of rules you have to follow and, and it, and even anything that's technology based there, it's all logical progression of things. This is the way things work and not they blinders as much, but as much as you just follow the process, which makes this audience here. Great. Well thank you so much Carla, for having me. It was great having you on the show. Thank you guys. I'm Rebecca Knight for Stu Miniman. Stay tuned for more of the cubes live coverage. Microsoft ignite.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Cohesity. Thank you so much for coming on the show tomorrow. most of the East coast and we serve as anything from litigation to environmental And so Carl, tell us a little bit about, you said you've got multiple occasions once that span We have most of the locations in Florida and Um, and you know, with the locations, you know, what are some of the business drivers that you're going And then of course, as part of that too, there's, there's legals holds on things, you know, stuff the case that stretches over, Side is, so some of those, you know, what do you have to be concerned about? when we talked to so many companies, it's, you know, how can I monetize data? we have to be careful obviously because conflict of interest, you know, we so have to keep data separate in some So as you said, the lawyers have a, have a big say in how things empower things happen. So I'd love to have you talk a little bit about, about how you think about this and then, all these things work, you know, kind of as, as one. I, how did you reach the kind of those And the more I use them, the more I agree with that. So you need to somebody that you can trust to bring in and say, you know, they don't have your best interests in mind and that's what you want. and recovery, I'd love to hear more about this panel and how you and your colleagues and best products out there, so you know, things can get in the way. specialists for you and weeks, you know, and things just end up working. so here at the conference, what are some of the conversations that you're having because you are in And you know, and all of a sudden you can apply it to your field. And the interesting is As you said, you are sometimes talking to people who are in a completely different industry with you So Carl, one of the things we've noticed there, Um, you know, I can get it behind this stuff, talk to automate processes and make dots of the world and you just keep looking at things and some things may make sense. I'm curious to hear how you bring
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ohio | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 miles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Carla | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Xero | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sunday night | DATE | 0.99+ |
Carolinas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Toledo, Ohio | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two teams | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Skype | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cohesity | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Shumaker loop | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
U S | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Carl holes | PERSON | 0.98+ |
seven locations | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
a year and a half | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first day | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Schulich | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Shumaker, Loop & Kendrick, LLP | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
a year and a half ago | DATE | 0.89+ |
about | DATE | 0.84+ |
DOE | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
Chyulu | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
Ty | PERSON | 0.7+ |
200 law | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
day | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
Carl Holzhauer | PERSON | 0.5+ |
Kendrick | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
Azure | ORGANIZATION | 0.45+ |
Ignite 2019 | TITLE | 0.38+ |
Toledo | PERSON | 0.36+ |
Carl Guardino, Silicon Valley Leadership Group | The Churchills 2019
>> From Santa Clara, in the heart of Silicon Valley it's theCUBE, covering the Churchills, 2019. Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're in Santa Clara, California at the Churchills. It's the ninth annual awards banquet put on by the Churchills Club, and this year is all about leadership. We're excited to be joined by our next guest who knows a little bit about leadership. He's Carl Guardino, the president and CEO of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group. Carl, great to see you. >> Great to see you, too, Jeff. >> So what is the Silicon Valley Leadership Group all about? >> The Silicon Valley Leadership Group is an association of about 360, primarily innovation economy employers that want to make a positive, proactive difference here in the region, as well as in our state and across the United States. >> What are some of the hot topics that are on top of the plate right now? Because there is a lot of craziness kind of going on here in Silicon Valley. >> There is. But what we try to do is impact those issues that are as important to families in their living rooms as they are to CEOs in their board rooms. And here in the bay area, we call those THEE issues. An acronym, T-H-E-E. The T, traffic; H, housing affordability; E, education; and the fourth E, the economy. And we try to bring together diverse points of view for those areas that unite us, where we can actually solve some of those challenges. >> Right, and those are big, big challenges. And you work both with public as well as private groups to try to bring them together to make movement on those things. >> We're a bridge. And the first thing about a bridge is that you try to bring folks together to cross the bridge and work together. The second most important thing about a bridge is that you build them, you don't burn them down. And that's the role that we try to play with 360 highly engaged CEOs and c-suite officers. >> And it's only appropriate, because tonight you'll be sitting down in a conversation with the mayor of San Jose, Sam Liccardo, to kind of get into some of these issues. San Jose seems to be on a roll right now, a positive roll. A lot of positive news coming out of San Jose. >> Yes, and that always starts with leadership rather than luck. San Jose mayor Sam Liccardo, 10th largest city in the United States, has been able to strike that balance of being pro-innovation economy, while also caring deeply about his citizens, the residents of San Jose, 1,053,000, and how we make sure that we have a strong and vibrant economy, but also a great quality of life. >> Right. So how do you even begin to - we'll start with traffic. The T in the THEE. To address that issue, it's so multifaceted, right, it's so tied to jobs, it's tied to housing, it's tied to the growth of the economy, you know, unfortunately freeways are slow to build, public transportation's expensive, but we continue to see growth there. How do you kind of eat that elephant, one bite at a time, with something like traffic? >> Well the role of the leadership group is, again, by bringing people together to solve complex problems in a democracy with winning solutions. So we'd rather win than whine. And when it comes to traffic, one of our core competencies is actually to lead and run ballot initiatives to fund transportation improvements throughout the region and the state. In fact, in the last 30 years alone, I've had the pleasure of going on loan from the leadership group to run ballot campaigns for transportation improvements that have totaled 30 billion dollars in revenue through those measures, approved by voters to reach into our own wallets, rather than our neighbors, to build improvements that, this Christmas, in time to go into your stocking, we'll be bringing BART to San Jose, and working on the electrification of Caltrain, linking transit and better road improvements, making it better for all of us trying to travel throughout this region. >> Right. Good, we need it. >> We do. >> And on the housing, you know, because the housing is also very closely tied to traffic, and we see that the old days of single-family homes on big pieces of dirt, those are going away. They just can't support it in higher density areas like San Fransisco, San Jose, to bring those jobs next to that. So we're seeing a huge transformation in the housing space as well. >> And we need a huge transformation, both in transportation and in housing. And it's really the flip side to the same coin. T, for tails, or transportation; H, for head, or housing. And you have to make sure that you keep those linked. In fact, one of our initiatives right now is to work with all six, fixed rail transit operators throughout the nine bay area counties. What are the current and future uses of those half miles around every fixed rail transit stop that you have? How do we maximize those uses? Here's a great example. What Google wants to do in downtown San Jose, at the Diridon SAP station, is only because of the Silicon Valley Leadership Group's work to bring BART to that station, electrify Caltrain, light rail is there, Amtrak, ACE, et cetera, and they want to have 20 to 25 thousand future Google employees there within the next 10 to 12 years. Why? Because it is a sustainable location that doesn't rely on you and I slogging through traffic in our single-occupant cars. >> Right. I can't wait to see what you guys do to El Camino. That's the next one that's going to - as somebody once said in one of these traffic things, it's just a bunch of old retail stores with empty parking lots, just placed by Microsoft. Or excuse me, by Amazon. So I think we'll see a big transformation with housing and jobs, you know, along that quarter, which happens to parallel the Caltrain, and is near and dear to my heart. So a lot of good opportunities I think to make improvements. >> Jeff, there is. And as hard as transportation and traffic solutions are to put into place, housing is even tougher. And while Bay Area residents think housing is the bigger crisis, the solutions are tougher to come about, because the community isn't as united on those solutions. So the role that a group of employers like ours play, is how do we bring people together around solutions that make sure that we build homes, that are good for everyone in our society. >> Well Carl, I like your positive attitude, a lot of winning and no whining, so I wish you nothing but success. And we'll be watching. >> Thank you, Jeff. >> You're welcome. He's Carl, I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE. We're at the Churchills in Santa Clara, California. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. We're in Santa Clara, California at the Churchills. here in the region, as well as in our state What are some of the hot topics And here in the bay area, we call those THEE issues. to make movement on those things. And that's the role that we try to play San Jose seems to be on a roll right now, a positive roll. 10th largest city in the United States, The T in the THEE. In fact, in the last 30 years alone, I've had the pleasure Good, we need it. And on the housing, you know, because the housing is also And it's really the flip side to the same coin. That's the next one that's going to - So the role that a group of employers like ours play, And we'll be watching. We're at the Churchills in Santa Clara, California.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley Leadership Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Jose | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Carl Guardino | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sam Liccardo | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Amtrak | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Fransisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
ACE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
30 billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Bay Area | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1,053,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Santa Clara, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Churchills Club | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
El Camino | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
tonight | DATE | 0.98+ |
Christmas | EVENT | 0.98+ |
half miles | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Caltrain | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
360 highly engaged CEOs | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.95+ |
10th largest city | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.95+ |
one bite | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
BART | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
12 years | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
25 thousand | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
six, fixed rail | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Diridon SAP station | LOCATION | 0.91+ |
about 360 | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
last 30 years | DATE | 0.82+ |
mayor | PERSON | 0.8+ |
Churchills | EVENT | 0.8+ |
nine bay area | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
Caltrain | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
operators | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
ninth annual awards | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
The Churchills | TITLE | 0.62+ |
officers | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
Churchills | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
Churchills | LOCATION | 0.56+ |
Carl Eschenbach, Sequoia Capital & Lynn Lucas, Cohesity | CUBEConversation, August 2019
(upbeat music) >> From our studios in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California. This is a CUBE Conversation. >> Hi, everyone. Welcome to this CUBE Conversation here in Palo Alto, theCUBE Studios. I'm John Furrier, host of theCUBE. We're here with two great guests, Carl Eschenbach, partner at Sequoia Capital on the board of Cohesity as well with the CMO Lynn Lucas. Lynn, great to see you. Carl, thanks for coming back on. >> Great to be here. >> Appreciate it. So Lynn, you know we've been following you guys for many many years, watching the rapid growth of Cohesity. Funding round after funding round, Unicorn. From a start up, to going through the atmosphere heading into orbit, nice growth. >> Mid-size company I would say now. >> Yeah >> Yeah >> No longer a startup. >> Growing like crazy. >> No longer a startup, yeah. >> Good round, good financing track. Thanks to Sequoia. >> Well, we're proud and happy investors and partners with them, that's for sure. >> Yeah, one of the things we're super excited about right now, Lynn I want to get your thoughts on this is that, how do you maintain the growth because cloud is an ever changing landscape, data management's really hot and changing. What's been the success formula for you guys, staying ahead? Both in terms of continuing to push the brand, push the message and success. What's been the formula? >> Well, I think it starts with our founder, Mohit Aron, and his vision and strategy which, if you go back, he's been extraordinarily consistent on and he saw this massive opportunity to take hyper-convergence, which of course he's really the father of from Nutanix and bring it to this whole other area of data, the vast majority of data that enterprises have. That is in all of these different silos and so really I think that Cohesity has this opportunity to be a once in a generation platform company much like VMware and really change the way enterprises, protect, manage, store and ultimately do more with their data. So, I'm going to say it's less about the brand. I'm proud about the brand. But, it's really about... >> You did a great job the brand, but I think the execution is. I think one thing I love about this market cloud in the next ten years ahead of us is that you can come into the market with a feature or a specific thing, like backup and turn it into a broad ranging high-growth, billions dollars of value. I think that's what you guys are on. But I, while we have Carl here, I want to put him on the spot because, you know, of his experience at VMware and now at Sequoia. What's he bringing to the table for Cohesity? What's his operational knowledge? What is some of the things Carl's brought to Cohesity? >> Oh, my gosh. >> What hasn't he brought. >> Well, Carl is obviously incredibly experienced and brings a wealth of go to market knowledge and connections and advice for us. I think instrumental in helping us see how to scale. As well as, change and shift the business model over to software and subscription. Which is what Cohesity did last year and is right in line with the move towards the cloud. >> Carl, your thoughts? >> I have to say one of the things just to echo, so thank you for those kind words. But quite frankly its all about execution and these folks at Cohesity know how to execute. If you just look at their scale over the last three years and their ability to execute. It's pretty impressive, not on the technology side only. But, if you think about their go to market motion and what they've not both here in the U.S., internationally, over into, you know, Asia and in Japan with the joint venture they have with SoftBank and some of the others. It's been amazing to watch them scale and to go market and also the ecosystem that they started to build around them and leveraging partners like HPE and Cisco as Cohesity has transitioned from being an appliance solution to being a software and data management platform and moving the hardware to other partners. It's been amazing to watch that transformation happen. So, it's technology, yes. But, it's also every other component and piece of the business that's been able to scale through good execution. >> Let's talk about the ecosystem, cause I think it's a super important, ever changing conversation. Especially as the bigger players get bigger and then the mid-size folks like you guys get bigger as well. The relationships change. You've certainly seen your share, Carl, at VMware. At VMworld every year, the ecosystem has its growth. It changes over, new value propositions are coming in. You have a constant rotation through the ecosystem dynamic. >> Yeah, no. >> What are some of the going on now that Cohesity's taken advantage of? >> What are they... >> Yeah, so because Cohesity is actually building a true platform as Lynn was articulating. If you're a platform in a data center it means two things. You have to partner with people on the south-bound side of that platform and the north-bound side of the platform because everything's going to go through a platform and because of that you form a very rich ecosystem but you also form sometimes competitors. In this world everyone I think describes it as friends and enemies. They're frenemies and they've done a very good job at that but at the same time they've really focused on key partners like an HPE or a Cisco or many others that can really differentiate themselves and allow them to focus on what they truly are and that's a data management software company. So, I think they've done a really good job navigating the ecosystem and building off of it and aligning with the right people. For example you sit here at VMWworld today. Look at the partnership they have with VMware they have V-ready, you know, certification across vsan, their infrastructure platform. Vcloud Director, AWS, you name it. So, I think they've done a great job and that's thanks to people like Lynn and the team. >> Lynn, talk about the ecosystem dynamic. Because you guys are actively market a big booth every year at VMworld as well as Amazon re:invent and other shows. You have to be out there. What are you hearing? What are some of the dynamics that your working through? >> Well speaking of VMworld and VMware they really were the original ecosystem partner and I think we believe that north of 70 percent of our customers are VMware customers and they're getting better value out of that. But, we haven't talked a lot about the cloud and that's obviously a massive ecosystem that's continuing to develop and bringing those two things together is something that Cohesity specializes in. With our native capabilities, with Amazon, Azure, Google but the other third piece of the ecosystem that we're now developing is the applications and that's unique to Cohesisty really redefining data management. Just announced Cohesity CyberScan based on Tenable running on the Cohesity platform. Prior to the, Splunk, running on the platform. So we're developing these ecosystem partnerships in new ways with application providers. >> So when are we going to see Cohesity world. (laughing) >> I am just so happy to be at Vmworld it's a great place for us to meet a lot of customers and partners. So we'll stay with that. >> Carl you were talking about, before we came on camera, about your first VMworld. You know, oh my god, it's huge, now it's even bigger. This is the opportunity for firms like Cohesity, if they continue the momentum. Building out applications which if you think about it that's an enabling technology. You can enable developers to be successful. That truly is a testament to what a true platform is. >> Yeah, again, I think, she said they don't have a big user conference yet. I don't think it will be long before we such momentum in the market that we will have a user conference at some point. Where you will see a large turnout of people using the technology. People from the ecosystem there and then developers as well and lastly you'll start to see application vendors like a Splunk or a Tenable who are actually now running their applications on top of this. This isn't just data management but it's also supporting applications and when you pull those three different you know constituents together you have a pretty big opportunity to pull off some type of platform show. >> Lynn, I got to put you on the spot here for a minute you got Carl, he's also a partner with Sequoia Venture Capital. What are the pros and cons with working with a big time tier one renowned VC like Sequoia is? Sequoia's Don Valentine is a well documented story. Moritz goes on, the young guns in there now. Get the operating experience from like the Carl's. Pretty established, they got a great business model, you know that. What's the pros and cons of working for the big time Sequoia. >> I've not seen any cons. Pros are as you said the operating experience and I think also the experience in guiding a company through this hyper growth. Cohesity is now well over 1200 employees. Last year, when you and I sat here much less than that, right? And they've seen it and done it before with other partners or with other portfolio companies that I think is one of the best pieces of advice that Carl has given us coming into our company is how to maintain that culture and that focus on the mission as we move through this tremendous growth phase. >> That's interesting, Sequoia loves you when your growing but then, but they've seen success. The cons haven't come yet. But, if you continue to grow there will be no cons. Everyone's happy and growing. But, I want to get your thoughts because Sequoia also builds world-class companies and they also, Apple the names are legendary. Your founder on theCUBE told me that he doesn't just want to get an exit. He wants to build world class company. >> That's right >> Well, exit is not as important as like EMEA. But in like public that happens. He's not in it for the cash. He wants build a durable world class company. >> That's exactly right, right Mohit has had a number of successes, Google, Nutanix. So he's not in this for the short return and we really are focused on building a culture and a set of values and a long term sustainable business and he really means what he says about. He's here to change the world and data is the foundation of what most businesses are going to compete on and he believes he can really empower organizations to do that and we can build a great culture and a great company while were helping. >> Carl when you hear that.. >> I want to piggyback off what Lynn just said and its exactly what Lynn articulated about Mohit to want to build a big enduring company that stands the test of time. If you look at our ethos at Sequoia we want to partner with founders from idea to IPO and beyond. We're not looking for a quit hit, a quick win. We want to be with them through IPO and beyond and build big legendary companies that stand the test of time and in the form of Cohesity we have that opportunity and we're well on that path to build a legendary platform company that will service both the enterprise in the cloud companies into the future. That's our mission, so I think our missions are aligned. >> Well you just answered the question I was going to ask you. That is music to your ears this is the kind of model you guys want and certainly you guys do a good job of exiting out on EMEA and doing, making your LPs a lot of money. You got to make money. >> Right, but, you know a lot of people think when our companies go public this is an exit for us. It's just an event. If we believe in the companies were going to hold long into the public market from that idea and that seed investment, like we did here at Cohesity, well beyond the IPO. >> There's a renaissance going on , I love it because two things are happening in this next 10 years. You seen a systems platform mindset come back versus the quick hits and also people want to build big companies they don't want to do the quick flips anymore. So at lot of young entrepreneurs are, they are in it for a mission. This is a new vibe. What kind of advice do you give entrepreneurs that are looking to bring that Cohesity model and get the attention of Sequoia? What are some of the things that you see as success for the young entrepreneurs out there? >> Yeah, so it is around the word mission. Like we want to partner with people that are mission driven that are going to have a huge impact on business and society as a whole and even you know the social efforts in our world. So were looking for people that want to change the trajectory of whatever it is they are addressing and we think for example with Cohesity there's a radical transformation taking place in the infrastructure and someone's got to innovate because a lot of innovators today are not coming from the incumbent it's coming from the next generation of founders like Mohit and he's very mission driven. Build a big company, service a community of people change the way people store and think about data and manage it and that mission-centric founder is one we love to partner with. >> Final question I'd love to get both your take on this question, Lynn and Carl is. When you meet someone that may not be inside the ropes of technology like the enterprise tech like we are the few and others and they ask you the question "Why is Cohesity so successful?" How do you describe the dynamics of the marketplace and Cohesity's role in it on it's success? What is the answer to that question? >> I think it's really two things. So one is I think that there is this generational shift in the architecture that underpins data and we've got a perfect storm with data doing exponential growth and as Carl's been saying there really hasn't been a lot of innovation in the infrastructure in more than a decade. Mohit saw that, but then that's combined with a mission, a passion for customers and sticking to that execution of serving the customer and that's making us successful. >> Carl your thoughts after that. >> Listen, it starts with technology and to have great technology you have to have a great technical founder and we have that in Mohit, time and time again. I can go, we've all talked about Mohit and how special he is. At the same time you need to build a company that has a special culture, that can stand the test of time, that is resilient, that has grit and has passion and perseverance for the work their doing around their mission and I think we have all of that in Cohesity and that's a lot of it's because of Mohit and people like Lynn that he's brought in around his executive team. You can just see that permeate through the entire organization. >> That's awesome. Thanks for sharing the insight. Carl, great to have you comment here with Lynn on Cohesity, I know your on the board. Lot of great things happening, looking to see what's happening at the VMware parties. Thanks for hosting some awesome events for the community. >> Can't wait to be back. Bring some of our customers on. >> Thanks for spending the time. This is theCUBE Conversation here at Palo Alto. I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
From our studios in the heart partner at Sequoia Capital on the board of Cohesity So Lynn, you know we've been following you guys Thanks to Sequoia. with them, that's for sure. What's been the success formula for you guys, staying ahead? and really change the way What is some of the things Carl's brought to Cohesity? and connections and advice for us. and also the ecosystem that they started to build Let's talk about the ecosystem, cause I think and because of that you form a very rich ecosystem What are some of the dynamics that your working through? and I think we believe that north of 70 percent So when are we going to see Cohesity world. I am just so happy to be at Vmworld This is the opportunity for firms like Cohesity, and when you pull those three different you know What are the pros and cons with working with a big time on the mission as we move through this tremendous That's interesting, Sequoia loves you when your growing He's not in it for the cash. the foundation of what most businesses are going and build big legendary companies that stand the test and certainly you guys do a good job of exiting and that seed investment, like we did here What are some of the things that you see as success and society as a whole and even you know What is the answer to that question? and sticking to that execution of serving the customer and to have great technology you have to Carl, great to have you comment here with Lynn on Cohesity, Bring some of our customers on. Thanks for spending the time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
VMworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lynn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Carl Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
SoftBank | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cohesity | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lynn Lucas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sequoia Venture Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
August 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Vmworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sequoia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VMWworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mohit | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Sequoia Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
EMEA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Moritz | PERSON | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Tenable | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two great guests | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Mohit | PERSON | 0.96+ |
UNLIST Carl Eschenbach, Sequoia Capital | CUBE Conversation, August 2019
(bright music) >> From our studios, in the heart of Silicon Valley, Palo Alto, California, this a "Cube" conversation. >> Hello everyone, and welcome to this special "Cube" conversation here, in the Palo Alto "Cube Studios". I'm John Furrier, the host of "theCube", where a special guest, "Cube" alumni Carl Eschenbach was a partner at "Sequoia Capital", former head of "VMWare", running all the fields, COO, many tiles of "VMWare", great to see you Cube alumni. Thanks for coming in. >> It's great to be here, it's always fun to join you on "theCube". We've done a number of these and it's always good to do 'em in different settings and talking about different topics and companies. >> Love the studio love to talk about "VMWare", what they're doing "VMWorld's" right around the corner, it's here, >> Yep. On our doorstep. The market's changing, you're now doing a lot of investments at "Sequoia Capital", you're on a lot of big company boards. Cohesively you eye-path, you're on the front end of all the new trends, on the new waves. So, dated management has become super hot again, we were just talking some editorial around big data, early days had duped, how that kind of went its way but "Cloud" brought in a whole 'nother level of focus on data management. Really, it's still just as important, I've been seeing a lot of investments in this space. What's your view of the current landscape of the data management space right now? >> It's a great question, clearly, you know, there's a tremendous amount of data being created each and every day and the more data there is there's more opportunity to manage it and analyze it and actually use it to help drive your business into the future and drive revenue growth. So there has been a lot of investments, from the likes of "Sequoia", now there's around data and data management specifically like we did with "Cohesity." But I think data, just because there's so much more being created at such a rapid pace it's just become so valuable and every company is becoming a data and data management company because it's one thing to centralize your data. It's another thing to get it into one repository, but really what you want to do is to be able to manage it, analyze it to future predict where you're going to take your business going forward. >> You know, and one of the things that we're hearing all the time is that you don't want to bring data and dump it into a whole new system. It's got to not be non-destructive, that's been a very key thing. "Cohesity" has been one of those companies that just has risen really fast from start up to a rapidly growing company to a really strong high valuation, customer success has been phenomenal. You guys are in that, you're on the board of "Cohesity", was that obvious with those guys when you saw them, when the investment was there, what was the-- what interests you about "Cohesity"? What's the big focus? >> Yes, so there was a couple of things, let's start with-- always when you're doing an investment you want to look at the founder. What is the founder and what is his or her experience and what have they done in the past? And when you look at Mohit, there a very few founders of his caliber when it comes to infrastructure, data, data management. If you just look back, he was a rockstar at "Google", and in fact, you could-- many people can say he wrote the distributed file system for "Google" that it still runs on today. He left there after doing an amazing job and became an entrepreneur and co-founded "Nutanix", and wrote the, you know, file system for hyper converged infrastructure and then he said, "you know what? I've done that, I'm going to go do my third thing and I'm going to go and now build a company. And build a company that's going to disrupt a very fragmented market, starting with data storage and backup, but really build a platform for data management." And I think "Sequoia", I wasn't there when they led the initial investment and Bill Coughran, my partner, led the investment said, "you know, this guy is a rockstar, technically, there's not many better than him, and if he can achieve what his vision looks like today, he's going to build a big valuable company." And that's when we leaned in. So it started with the founder, it started with his experience, and then it started with what was he disrupting, and he was disrupting a legacy market in the infrastructure space that hasn't had a lot of innovation. So if you think it's the competitors of "Cohesity", its fun to compete in this market because a lot of them are legacy and they're trying to protect their legacy and they're not innovating and this is something that Mohit has done time and time again. In fact, it's probably the third time he's done it. >> He's a unicorn builder as we say here in "theCube" team, we loved him, he's been on "theCube" many times. But you're the new guy at "Sequoia", so they say, "Okay, Carl, you know the enterprise, you take it." >> Yeah. So you get on the board, it's interesting because his-- he's been on "theCube" and he's told me here, in studio that, you know, executing the entry strategy of the market with data backup and the normal-- the team was huge. But he had the vision, he saw that it wasn't going to be about data management backup and recovery, all that kind of categorical venture. He saw it as a bigger cloud place, sort of as a platform as you said. >> Yeah. What is the success formula for that because a lot of people try to compare, you know, this company that company and "Cohesity" has a unique differentiation. What's your take on that? >> The thing that's really unique about what Mohit and the team at Cohesity have created here is the fact that they've truly built the platform. A lot of people talk about building platforms and platform is like the holy grail in the enterprise because it's very sticky they've done it. Yes, they can do backup, but the fact that they have a distributed file system is scales, like, at web scale that can be used on premise, in the cloud in hybrid environments, the duplication, can do replication can do snapshot and cloning all that but most importantly what he's built is this platform that takes a very fragmented set of data, centralizes it, manages it, but then more importantly a lot of people say where's your data and where are you applications, he's built this platform to centralize data, and now what he's doing completely different than anyone else can do here, John, is he's bringing the actual application to the data. So you can now start to run applications on top of his platform, not just centralize your data, no one else can do that in the industry. >> I think that's one of the key things you see in these successful companies, and then Mohit again talked about-- you enter the market on a known beach head, good tan, but that's just the backup plan of it. >> Yeah. >> But they've been successful. And this has been a formula only a few companies have pulled off, "VMWare" was one of them where you were involved in from the beginning and "VMWare" virtualization has changed the game. And so I got to ask you being to having that "VMWare" history and legacy pedigree, as former CEO of "VMWare", where you've seen it from, you know, few employees to where it is today or when you left. What does "Cohesity" do for those customers 'cause remember "VMWare" was a very ecosystem friendly company. >> Yeah. But that ecosystem has been evolving, what does "Cohesity" bring to "VMWare" customers? >> It's really interesting because if you look at the workloads that are being backed up, supported, or the data that's being centralized on their platform, probably I'm guessing maybe greater than seventy percent of the workloads are VMWare workloads. So there's a tight relationship with VMWare technologically speaking because the amount of workloads and VMs that are being backed up on the "Cohesity" platform. But it goes further than that, there's a lot of commonality around how they go to market. They have a common set of channel partners that resell their technologies that do integration for customers, we have a lot of certifications. With "VMWare" we're VMware ready and certified on "vSAN" same with their hyper converged infrastructures stack. We're even supported are with the "VMWare" on "AWS" platform, we're "VMWare" ready certified for that too, to backup both on premise and off premise. So there are so many different areas we're integrated with VMWare both on go-to-market side and technically speaking, and then like I said, look at the amount of workloads that we're supporting, probably seventy percent plus are "VMWare" environments so, I think it's a really strong partnership and I'd say it's one of the stronger ones that "VMWare" has when it comes to building a data management back-up storage solution. >> The "Amazon" relationship with "VMWare" is certainly critical and "Cohesity" plays what, on both fronts there? >> Yes. So, actually there's three different solutions here. We are supporting "AWS", so "Cohesity" runs on "AWS". We support and we're certified with "VMWare", and then the three of us have come together and we're supported on the VMWare platform running on AWS to do backup and storage recovery for that as well. So there's three different ways those partners are in for. >> So Cohesity is not a public company yet so, and you're on the board so I'm going to ask you the board question. You're sitting in the board meetings, you know, CEO comes in, we're going to take that hill, this is where the future growth it. What is that conversation like? Where is the future growth for "Cohesity"? What does the future look like for them? What do they need to do? >> Yeah so, I do think it is around data management. We're still on the early innings, John, around data management. Backup clearly, I think they can crush the market and I think they're doing a good job competing against the more traditional players and even the emerging ones. We can differentiate ourself, but I think the real opportunity is to really go in with a point solution and then very quickly from that vertical entry go to a horizontal play and do data backup data recovery and data management and the more data we can take from this fragmented world and centralize it and then start to think about, wow we can bring things like "Splunk", bring applications to the data. Now try to move the data around to meet the applications, I think that is a rich opportunity and if you look at the go-to-market strategy of "Cohesity" one thing that's been very impressive to me having grown up for thirty years in the enterprise world, they started out selling to the enterprise, they're landing fortune five, fortune ten companies at scale with multimillion dollar deals as an entry point just to completely redo their backup architecture and how they're going to do data management. You don't see that too often. In three years, the revenue ramp this company's experienced is quite impressive, and I think they have a long way to go, and it's going to be on the back of data management going forward. >> You know, one of the things also they've done real well is they align with the community, they have great events. Their parties at "VMWorld" are legendary, reinventing. So, you know, they always-- they align, they work hard, they play hard but they get the job done. >> Yeah, no, they're known from what I understand, you know, they have a great CMO who you've met many a times, Lynn, she is not only a great CMO and a marketeer, but she knows how to throw a good party and there's always lines waiting outside the doors. A board member, I'm like, "Oh my god, how much did that cost?" But the amount of leads we get out of it, it's a no-brainer. >> Final question, how's it been as a VC? What's it like there? How's life been for you? >> Oh, I feel very fortunate, John. To be a partner at "Sequoia." It's one of the greatest, if not, greatest venture capital firm of all time, forty six years of rich history and to be part of it has been a blessing for me, and I get to bring all of my many years of operating skills to many younger companies. I get to see a lot, get to learn a lot, get to invest in some of the most exciting up and coming companies like "Cohesity" or "Snowflake" or "UiPath" or "Zoom" that's now gone public. I couldn't be happier and be more excited with what I'm doing and the ability to learn everyday from some great partners at "Sequoia." >> You surely got the mightiest touch and great experience in the enterprise; the company's lucky to have you like "Cohesity," congratulations . >> Thank you. >> Thanks for bringing the insight here on "theCube," I'm John Furrier, you're watching a special "Cube" conversation here in the Palo Alto studios, thanks for watching. (lively music)
SUMMARY :
in the heart of Silicon Valley, many tiles of "VMWare", great to see you Cube alumni. and it's always good to do 'em in different settings of all the new trends, on the new waves. from the likes of "Sequoia", now there's around You know, and one of the things and Bill Coughran, my partner, led the investment so they say, "Okay, Carl, you know the enterprise, and the normal-- the team was huge. What is the success formula for that because a lot of people is he's bringing the actual application to the data. and then Mohit again talked about-- you enter the market And so I got to ask you being to having that "VMWare" bring to "VMWare" customers? and I'd say it's one of the stronger ones and then the three of us have come together You're sitting in the board meetings, you know, and the more data we can take from this fragmented You know, one of the things also But the amount of leads we get out of it, and I get to bring all of my the company's lucky to have you like "Cohesity," conversation here in the Palo Alto studios,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Carl Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sequoia Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lynn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
August 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cohesity | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bill Coughran | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sequoia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thirty years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
forty six years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMWorld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both fronts | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMWare | TITLE | 0.98+ |
greater than seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Zoom | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
third time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMWare | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
companies | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
third thing | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one repository | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
theCube | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
today | DATE | 0.93+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Palo Alto, California | LOCATION | 0.89+ |
Silicon Valley, | LOCATION | 0.89+ |
VMware | TITLE | 0.88+ |
Mohit | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
fortune five | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Carl Moberg, Cisco | Cisco Live US 2019
>> Live from San Diego, California It's the queue covering Sisqo Live US 2019 Tio by Cisco and its ecosystem. Barker's >> Welcome Back to the Q. We are running out Day two of our coverage of Sisqo Live 2019 from San Diego. Finally. Smartened. Joining Me with David Dante, David Ayer welcoming Carl Hobart to the queue for the first time. Director of product management for network service orchestration from Cisco. Welcome, Carl. >> Thank you so much. Thanks for having you guys >> wearing the Definite Zone. This area has been completely jammed. So buzzy, so full of excitement. For the last two full days, 95% we've been talking about all of the news, the announcement. But network automation is something that we've also been talking about. I was looking at some stats from this Cisco website. I think it was an infographic the other day where of network management is still manual, and I think what hit toe optics alone does that create talk to us about network automation and orchestration? In 2019 what's thie state of the art >> A LL. That's a big topic, but let me see if we can feel some of the layers >> off feeling you can. >> I do spend equated with quite a bit of time with this. And I also have the pleasure of having this conversation with many, many customers because, let me tell you, as uncomfortable as it may feel, you know, for a company like Cisco that is actually the number one topic that customers bring to us. They trust us on so many other dimensions in terms, in terms of the infrastructure that we bring. But the one thing that they really don't want to bring to the front is how can we help them automate their networks? Right? And there's a couple of pressure points going for them. I mean, it's the obvious basic stuff. That manual steps introduce an insane amount of outages and lowers equality. But it's also preparing for what's going to come. So it's that perfect mix between unavoidable and somewhat tedious. It is truly somewhat tedious. It's about cleaning up in front of your door, right? So they're turning to us to try to understand, and this is where it gets really interesting. What are others doing around this? Right, so we get to build a very nice and interesting body of experience working with a number of us, you can imagine large network owners going through the motions towards natural automation because that's number. The observation number one is that it's a long journey. It involves a whole lot of rolls inside of the organization, and it just takes time. So it's not one of these things you can buy yourself out of or you can, you know, hardware yourself out of. It's literally a big a turning point for how they organize themselves, how they hire people, which is huge. We've even had example. So they had to rethink the interior decoration off some of their some of their sight because with the emergence of software people of automation experts, they don't work the same way as traditional network engineers, right? They need another type of building, and that's how it really daunts on some of our customers that okay, way have to step back. So I was coming back to your actual question. Question is that the state of the art right now is the insight that it's a big, big I wouldn't say revolution but evolution towards the software centric world and that it permeates the entire life off people that owns large networks. That insight is actually >> what I saw that the light bulb goes off, okay, but it's it's a maturity curve. It's a bell curve it is for so do you still have? Sure you do. You see complacency. You see fear. What's that? What's that mix look like right now? Is it just a tip of the spear leaning in? Or is it the fat middle is now going for it >> from a vendor perspective. I am, after all, representative with Vova vendor. What's really unique at this place in time is that customers are open and front, loading the conversation with their problems. In many other faces off technology turn, they don't want to talk about their problems. Even even worse, They don't want us to remind them about their problems. They take a front now that's what they want to do, and they want to talk about how bad it is, right, Dave? It's almost like they're competing Now. I'll tell you about it is for me compared to how the others are. So that's huge, because that's true. The tip of the iceberg, like you said on the Insight that they actually have a big honking issue and that time is against them, right? So they are reaching out to vendors wanting to talk about the problems that that's pretty unique. So I think most of the fear and most of the, you know, rationalizing whether in a bad spot that's actually behind them Now it's about getting to solutions. Now it's about opening up, asking for help, sharing the problem with other vendors and other players in the field, and actually kind of almost like huddling around the problem and trying to move it forward as an industry. >> Now is it because you saw that the hyper scale er's had so much success with automation? Is it because of digital transformation? Trying to, you know, grow global scale? They they want to take cost out and shift Resource is why now? Why is it so total mind? >> So not one big thing, but a certain number of incremental pressures that has bean, you know, building up towards a breaking point. I'd say the one thing maybe that comes around mostly is that everybody's very excited about to see what virtualization Khun do for them, right, But virtualization assumes a certain type of the frame roll asset management in a sort of type of automation that blind the assumes, humans or other group, Right? So a big pressure point is to understand, as long as we're doing things manually, there is no virtual ization to be had or actually, virtualization will just make it more complex, and there are no gains to be had. So when I'm thinking about maybe the number one pressure, that's the one thing we have to get humans out of the loop in order to be able to virtual eyes, anything right? Otherwise, well, there will be no gains to be had. And also, I think it's the pressure on the expectations from the customer base. And they don't fundamentally don't understand why networking isn't as agile as workload management applications and all that kind of thing. So we're kind of inheriting the flexibility of the application world on the expectations are kind of falling back on the networking side of things. >> So you talk about virtualization your presume here, including containers in that in that context, right? So that adds another dimension of >> yeah, so the thing you like you want to spend up a container takes, you know, optimized cases below a second. Then go to the phone and call the networking team and ask for a new villain in the top of racks, which simply won't be a good thing, right? So you wanted exactly inside that was fast. Took less than a second. Now let me put a faxing to the networking team so they can go and set the connectivity of said No one. Ever >> right smoke signal that they're never smokes. You go. It makes the string phone carrier pigeons that fly >> little one fly on. Eventually we will have a villa so that that is the thing. They expect the network to respond with the same lightning speed and not only to creating things but moving things, actually tearing down things and removing configurations from the network. That whole lifecycle making the network looked like a malleable resource in the same sense that applications now are through continent generalizations and other things. Is this true at the breaking point, then, for the network engineers? I mean, they've had a uphill battle for a while anyway, but that one really took the price, right? >> Are there any industries in particular that you're seeing were there first or are the first to raise their hands and say, We've got a problem, anything that surprises you Or is it pretty horizontal? Whatyou're saying? >> There's one thing that I really tried to follow and I'll let you in on this secret. You know, between the three of us here, of course, communication service providers and let me spend a couple of seconds on this, mostly the carriers carrier. So there's a whole slew off cos that does nothing but sell Ben with the other carriers. They don't have many end customers themselves, but they passed traffic between the cloud giants and others. Write. It's paper thin margins on enormous amounts of band with, and there's simply no room for humans, right? It's almost like cloud economics, where power is the deciding factor. How cheap you khun game, you can get power. It's the same thing for these people. How how cheap can we produce Massive band with? Those guys were the 1st 1 to do things like connecting their serum system, a sales force or whatever. They're running straight into their network, right? No humans, nothing like that, right? So that's one of my little secrets. I track what they do because they're they're under such extreme margin pressures. >> Yes, right. But because it costs are coming down. And that man, the data volumes or going to the so they're so >> they're they're the probably the first, like, true commodity player in networking, right? So they have to get everything that's not, you know, fixed. Just get it out, get it off the ship, right? Just get it off the shape to win, Right? So there, there, my little secrets. You know, I try to track what they do because they're usually a little bit ahead. >> So what are they doing? >> So they they are again what they're trying to do, You know, normally, in a complication service provider or for that matter, and ambitious enterprise, you have a pretty thick stack of software, right? So at the bottom, obviously, you have the package passing things physical or virtual. Then you have orchestration. Maybe then provisioning, you know? Yeah, layer after layer after layer that has served the services companies really well over the years. Right? But when you step back and look at what you actually do with commodity services, we realized that the little path through that software you can fix with a very, very small set off functions, right? So they're literally just ripping things out and connecting again. They're crn systems straight into the network, and you can hear the pain scream of many. You know, companies that make a whole lot of money and integration, services and and business services and billing and rating in charging and all. That kind of stuff they do is just like like a bear metal implementation ofthe communication, right? So that's what they do. It turns out to be first of all, doable. So they're showing as all that you actually don't have to. Now they have a pretty particular menu off services that they provide. It's pretty short and sweet. It's bad with >> it's a cost for megabit, no frills, exactly >> nothing. No up selling here. But it's what it is, is what it is. So they have having a little easier, but they're really blazing the trail and showing that this can be done with very, very limited amounts off software. But I think that's what they're showing, and the second thing you almost said, it is many of course, enterprises are now extremely application centric that permeates the whole conversation, right? People think of the world in applications apologies, and the network supports the applications. Apologies. So being able to have the network then lock step move with the applications is truly key. I know it sounds simple, but it's it's a It's a big thing for many of our customers >> to ocean. >> It is, well, it is an ocean, and it's it's about making the network come alive for the application owners so it can follow in an ergonomically nice and robust fashion. That's the other really big pressure. So following people that has a strong application bias and trying to delight them as a networking person, which is by no means easy. Some of them actually don't like as much. You know. Some of them would actually like to get rid of the network if they physically could write, but they can't, so they have to live with it. And it's up to us then, to prove that there's actually value in the network by surfacing all the cool stuff that we have to them on their home turf, so to speak. So that's the kind of the second >> driver here, this gold in that net, then that data that's traveling over that it is it is for sure >> is just We haven't made it really easy for them to love way have to improve on them. That's what we have. >> We'll, Carl, thank you so much for a excited, passionate conversation with David me about network service, orchestration and the opportunities. And I love how you're starting to see customers first step in any problem. Situation is admitting. I have a problem and you're saying that that's awesome. We thank you so much for sharing your time and your energy with us. Thanks >> for having me. >> Our pleasure for day Volante. I'm Lisa Martin. We're wrapping up Day two of our coverage of Sisqo live. Join Dave student Amanda myself tomorrow as we broadcast all day. Our third and final day here and Sisqo live in San Diego. Thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
Live from San Diego, California It's the queue covering Welcome Back to the Q. We are running out Day two of our coverage of Sisqo Live 2019 Thanks for having you guys For the last two full days, That's a big topic, but let me see if we can feel some of the layers So it's not one of these things you can buy It's a bell curve it is for so do you still have? So I think most of the fear and most of the, you know, rationalizing number one pressure, that's the one thing we have to get humans out of the loop in order to be able to virtual So you wanted exactly It makes the string phone carrier They expect the network to respond It's the same thing for these people. And that man, the data volumes or going So they have to get everything that's not, you know, fixed. They're crn systems straight into the network, and you can hear the pain scream of many. But I think that's what they're showing, and the second thing you So that's the kind of the second is just We haven't made it really easy for them to love way have to improve on them. We thank you so much for sharing your time and your energy with us. as we broadcast all day.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Dante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Carl Hobart | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Ayer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Moberg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
95% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amanda | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Diego | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
San Diego, California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vova | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
less than a second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Sisqo | TITLE | 0.98+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Khun | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
1st 1 | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
Sisqo Live | EVENT | 0.73+ |
Tio | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.69+ |
a second | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
two full days | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
Barker | PERSON | 0.67+ |
one big thing | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
couple of seconds | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
Ben | PERSON | 0.64+ |
one topic | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
Sisqo | EVENT | 0.56+ |
agile | TITLE | 0.53+ |
Live 2019 | TITLE | 0.53+ |
2019 | EVENT | 0.47+ |
Cisco | TITLE | 0.46+ |
last | QUANTITY | 0.46+ |
Volante | PERSON | 0.44+ |
US | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.42+ |
Carl Krupitzer, ThingLogix | AWS Marketplace 2018
>> From the ARIA Resort in Las Vegas, it's theCube. Covering AWS Marketplace. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCube. We are at AWS Reinvent 2018. We got to get a number, I don't know how many people are here, but Vegas is packed. I think it's in six different venues tonight. We're at the ARIA at the hub with the AWS Marketplace & Service Catalog Experience, kicking everything off. We're excited to be joined by cube alumni. Last we saw him, I think it was in San Francisco Summit 2017. Carl Krupitzer, the CEO of ThingLogix. Carl, great to see you. >> Thank you it's great to be here. >> So I think you were saying before we turned the cameras on, you came early days. This whole piece here was not even as big a the room we're in. >> Right well we were part of the service launch for IoT, and that was just a few years ago, and it's exponentially bigger. Yeah. Just the expo, this is not even the expo floor right? And this is bigger than what we had originally. So excited to see it grow. >> So IoT keeps growing, growing, growing. That's all we hear about. In Industrial IoT, we did the Industrial IoT launch with GE back in better days. For them, huge opportunity. Really seeing a lot of momentum. What are some of the observations you're seeing actually out in marketplace? >> You know it's interesting. When we first started with the IoT service offering for AWS, there was a lot of proof of concepts going on, a lot of people kind of hacking their way through understanding what IoT is and how it could impact their business. And I think we've gotten to the point now where we're seeing more production roll-outs with very considerate business drivers behind it. >> Right. I think it's funny you're talking about doing some research for this, and you guys are really specific. I love it. It's not Greenfield projects you know? Have specific design objectives, have specific KPIs, have specific kind of ideas about what the functionality you want before you just kind of jump into IoT space with two feet. >> Right. Yeah we strongly discourage companies from just jumping in with both feet just because right? It's an expensive undertaking IoT, and it has the potential to really change your business for the better if you do it well. >> So where are you seeing the most uptake? Or maybe that surprises you the most in these early days? Kind of industry wise? >> We see a lot of creative use cases starting to come up. Kind of that secondary use of data, and one of the things that we've-- we kind of describe our customers having a life cycle of IoT right? They come in to solve a specific problem with us, which is usually a scalability, or a go to market issue. And then very quickly, they kind of get to the art of the possible. What can we do next? And we see a lot of companies really getting creative with the way they do things. From charging with-- using our FID tags in sub-Saharan Africa for water to solar power and things like that. It's interesting to see companies that didn't exist a few years ago, and couldn't have existed a few years ago, really kind of getting a lot of traction now. >> Right. It's funny we did an interview with Zebra Sports a few years ago actually now. And they're the one that's old RFID technology that put the pads in the shoulder pads for all the NFL players. They're on the refs, they're in the balls. It is such a cool way to apply on old technology to a new application and then really open up this completely different kind of consumer experience in watching sports. When you've got all this additional data about how fast are they running and what's their acceleration. And I think they had one example where they showed a guy in an interception. They had the little line tracker. Before he'd gotten all the way back in, it was a pick six. It's unbelievable now with this data. >> Our Middle Eastern group is actually doing a pilot right now for camel racing. So we're doing telemetry attached to the camels that are running around the tracks. We're getting speed and heart rate and those sorts of things. So it's everywhere right? >> I love it. Camel racing. So we're here at the AWS Marketplace Experience. So tell us a little bit about how's it working with AWS. How's the the marketplace fit within your entire kind of go to market strategy? >> Well so for us, the marketplace is really key to our go to market strategy right? I mean we're a small company and we-- our sales team is really kind of focused on helping customers solve problems and the marketplace really offers us the ability to not have to deal with a lot of the infrastructure things of servicing a customer right? They can go there, they can self sign up, they can implement the platform, our technology platform on their own and then billing is taken off of our plate. So it's not something that we have to have a bunch of resources dedicated to. >> Is there still a big services component though, that you still have to come in to help them as you say kind of define nice projects and good KPI's and kind of good places to start? Or do they often times on the marketplace purchase just go off to the races on their own? >> So it's a combination. If companies are looking to solve a specific problem with an IoT platform like Foundry, it's definitely a self implementable thing and it's becoming more and more self implementable. Foundry really deploys into a customers account using Cloud formation, and Cloud formation templates allow us to kind of create these customized solutions that can then be deployed. So it's-- we're getting a combination of both. >> Yeah, and I would imagine it's taken you into all kinds of markets that you just don't-- you just don't have the manpower to cover when you have a distribution partner at EWS. >> Yeah it's made things a lot faster for us to be able to spin up vertical solutions or specific offerings for a particular large customer. Marketplace can take care of all of the infrastructure on that. >> Alright so what are you looking for here at Reinvent 2018? You've been coming to these things for awhile. I know Andy's tweeting out, his keynote is ready to have the chicken wing contest I think, last night at midnight. Too late for me, I didn't make it. (laughs) >> For us I mean, some of the more exciting things that are out there are the emergence of server-less right? You see server-less, all of those AWS services really taking off. >> Right. >> But there's also the Sumarian, the ARVR's really kind of exploding. So for us it's really about, this is a great place for us to see the direction that AWS is heading and then make sure that our offering, and our technology is layered on top of that appropriately. >> And what are you hearing from your customers about Edge? All the talk about Edge and there's some fudd I think going about how does Edge work with Cloud and to me it's like two completely separate technology applications, but then you know what you're trying to accomplish. As kind of the buzzwords, Edge gets beyond the buzz and actually starts to be implemented, what do you kind of seeing and how's that working together with some of the services that Amazon's got? >> I mean Edge architecture's are an important component to a solution. Especially solutions that require real time data processing and decision making at the shop floor or whatever you have. AWS has taken very big strides toward creating service offerings and products down at the Edge that interface well with the Cloud. So for us, our perspective on it is that the Edge is really a reflection of the business logic and the processes and things that we define and build for a customer. Because ultimately those Edge processes have to feed the enterprise processes, which is what we really focus on right? How do we get machine data into enterprise systems? So Edge technology for us is definitely a consideration and when we build our select technology solutions, we look at Edge as a component in that architecture and we try to meet the needs of the customers specific use case when it comes to Edge. >> Right. Yeah it's not killing the Cloud. Who said that? - Right. >> So silly. >> Yeah it can't kill it. >> It's not slowing down this thing. >> Right. Alright Carl well thanks for taking a few minutes and have great Reinvent. >> Yeah thank you. - [Jeff] Hydrate. >> Thanks for your time. Definitely. - They say hydrate. Alright he's Carl, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCube. We're at AWS Marketplace inservice catalog experience. We're at the Aria in the quads. Stop on by. Thanks for watching we'll see you next time.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. We're at the ARIA at the hub with the So I think you were saying and that was just a few years ago, What are some of the observations you're seeing When we first started with the IoT service and you guys are really specific. and it has the potential to really change your business and one of the things that we've-- that put the pads in the shoulder pads that are running around the tracks. How's the the marketplace fit the ability to not have to deal with a lot and it's becoming more and more self implementable. all kinds of markets that you just don't-- all of the infrastructure on that. the chicken wing contest I think, some of the more exciting things that are out there the ARVR's really kind of exploding. and actually starts to be implemented, and the processes and things that we define Yeah it's not killing the Cloud. and have great Reinvent. Yeah thank you. We're at the Aria in the quads.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Krupitzer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ThingLogix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ThingLogix | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
EWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.98+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Zebra Sports | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
San Francisco Summit 2017 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
AWS Marketplace | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
last night | DATE | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
Reinvent 2018 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
six different venues | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
sub-Saharan Africa | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Foundry | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.95+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.94+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Aria | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
tonight | DATE | 0.93+ |
ARIA Resort | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
pick six | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
AWS Reinvent 2018 | EVENT | 0.84+ |
two completely separate technology applications | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Sumarian | TITLE | 0.72+ |
FID | OTHER | 0.72+ |
Greenfield | LOCATION | 0.7+ |
theCube | ORGANIZATION | 0.67+ |
ARIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.67+ |
Middle Eastern | LOCATION | 0.66+ |
Industrial IoT | EVENT | 0.65+ |
NFL | ORGANIZATION | 0.59+ |
CEO | PERSON | 0.51+ |
theCube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.43+ |
Marketplace | TITLE | 0.42+ |
ARVR | TITLE | 0.34+ |
Carl Eschenbach, Sequoia Capital | CUBEConversation, Sept 2018
(dramatic music) >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are in our Palo Alto studios having a CUBEConversation. We have a itty-bitty little break in the middle of this crazy conference season. Next week, we're back on the road. And one of the places we're going is UiPath Forward Americas. It's our first time to the UiPath user conference. They're all about the RPA, robotic process automation, which is a super hot space and we're really excited to have with us today Carl Eschenbach. He's a partner at Sequoia Capital, who just came in on UiPath's latest round of funding. Which was pretty significant. You can read all about it in the papers as they say. So we're excited to have Carl here. Carl, great to see you again. >> Great to be here. Thanks for having me, Jeff. >> Absolutely, so we of course known you for years and years and years, you had a long, illustrious career at VMware. You've been in the VC world at Sequoia for a couple of years. How are you liking the transition to VC? >> I really enjoyed it. I had a great many year run, almost 15 years at VMware. I was thankful for it, but the transition to Sequoia, I don't think it could have gone any better. I've really enjoyed it and to be working at Sequoia, which is a tremendous platform behind you, with 45 years of rich history, is just a privilege. And leveraging my operating experience of 29 years, now putting it to work through the Sequoia brand, has been pretty exciting for me. I'm very thankful. >> It's been a pretty good run for former VMware guys, in VC. You know, Jerry Chen is on all the time, from Greylock. There's a number of you guys out there. >> Yeah, there's a number. I think Jerry, I think Steve Herrod's now. You know, Martin Casado who was the founder of Nicira, that we bought at VMware was at VC, so there's a bunch of people who have proliferated the VC market, but none of them got the opportunity to be at Sequoia like I did. So I feel very privileged. >> And it really points to the opportunity, the continue innovation opportunity in the enterprise space. 'Cause you're not investing in dating apps, or autonomous vehicles, maybe autonomous vehicles, I don't know, but it's really more the enterprise opportunity continues to be rich with new, kind of transformative opportunities. >> Yeah I think that's right. I spend the majority of my time, as you could imagine, in the enterprise, that's where I grew up, and my operating experience is all in the enterprise deep infrastructure, so I leverage that experience here at Sequoia, focusing on the enterprise. Both infrastructure, hardware, software, public, private cloud, SaaS. So anything associated with offerings in the enterprise, is where I focus and I'll tell you, over the last few years it's been a really rich environment for an investor to think about what's happening in the enterprise as people still are looking for technologies to transform their business at such a rapid rate. Both on premise and obviously with the cloud environment, it's not if, it's when and how fast people ultimately move into the cloud. >> Right, it fascinates me how we continue to uncover these huge buckets of inefficiency. I mean, you think, I used to tease my friends at a center, tease them that you guys wrang all the fat out of the supply chain, now everything's on back order all the time. >> Yeah. >> But we still find huge chunks of inefficiency, and huge opportunities to get more value out, which is I think, one of the fundamental differences in this kind of stock round up and this productivity. It's real, it's not just smoke and mirrors, there are huge still opportunities. >> Yeah, no I agree, I mean, listen, there are huge opportunities to drive gains and productivity. One of the things we're going to talk about is RPA, for example. How do you automate your enterprise to move towards a digitized world? And by doing that you become more automated, which just drives your productivity, your people that much higher, so I think with the ever increasing use of AI and machine learning, getting deeper, deeper integrated into enterprise solutions. It makes things that much more automated, which impacts the productivity of your people, which hopefully has great returns on both your top line growth and bottom line savings. >> Right, so let's dig into that, 'cause business process automation has been around for a long time. I was teasing about a center, you know you bring 'em in and they spend a lot of time, and they map a bunch of stuff out and they change a lot of things. RPA, robotic process automation, which is a relatively new term, I didn't hear about it 'til relatively recently, is a very different approach to automation, than just hiring in all the consultants. It's about actually letting machines learn, listen, and start to build those new processes. >> Yeah, if you think about the BPO world, BPO was still and is still a very manual human intensive activity. To your point, you're bringing on all these people. You do an outsource and then but there's still someone there, you know, doing data entry, and doing very mundane, kind of easy work. But it's all human driven. And people used to try to solve this by going to offshore locations, with lower cost opportunities, where you can get a workforce that's much cheaper, than here in the states. But again it was all human driven. Now with the advent of something like RPA, that can be substituted with software, and software bots or robots. And by doing that it just drives up the efficiency at which you're doing everything in your older system. So, that's why we've seen such a rapid acceleration that you can't ignore around RPA. Just over the last couple of years this has accelerated extremely quickly, the technology's become a lot more mature, people are starting to implement it, it's one of the first instantiations of AI in the enterprise. And if you think about it, Jeff, implementing a software bot that may replace, three, four, five humans. And oh, by the way, the bot can work 24 hours a day. Oh, by the way, the accuracy rate of the bot is probably significantly higher than a human, so the ROI and the value proposition around RPA is very straightforward. You can't ignore the value it brings. And everyone as you know is always looking to save cost, but it does more than just save cost. It actually starts to impact your top line revenue growth. Because you can take those humans, who used to do those mundane tasks, and you can repurpose them to work on, if you will, revenue generating, profitable activities, while the software bots take care of all the automation of your older legacy systems. >> Right, and it's even, not even, its little things. I'm never amazed, right? I do a ton of interviews, we talk about automation all of the time. I still do a whole lot of manual stuff, that I would much rather have my robotic assistant help me do, simple things like you know, make sure that we get the picture out from this interview, you know, after the fact. All these little mundane tasks that the sum total of which are a lot of activity, and then as you said, I think the other really important piece is the accuracy, right? When you, unfortunately, with computers, unfortunately, they only like to do it the way they get set up to do it. They're not really good at errors so much, so once you set it up. But you know, this RPA is different in that the people aren't doing it, they're actually letting the robots do it so VMware early days of virtualization, now we're getting to the point where the compute, the store, and the network are to a point where you get the horsepower to support this type of function. >> Yes. >> I didn't have it in the past. >> Yep, yeah and with RPA, I think, one of the things that's pretty neat, is people are starting to implement RPA, and they're always finding new use cases for it. And once they get some experience in programming these software bots, right, they start to realize well maybe we can implement this in this other area. So it may start in a finance organization, and it may move into, you know, automating cost centers, or automating what you're doing in sales, or sales operations, so there's many opportunities, once it's implemented once to find other use cases. And actually, you're starting to see people become software bot developers. Like they have to set up these bots to implement 'em in their environment. So people have to learn how to program these bots, and then implement 'em. So there's an ecosystem that's starting to be established around the RPA industry. You mentioned some of the Accentures of the world, they're the old BPOs. There's some of the biggest customers of people like UiPath because what they do is they say, wow, today we're solving this with humans, but if I could solve this now with software, in RPA and technology, like UiPath is providing, I can drive up my margins because I'm doing it through the use of software. And I can repurpose those people to do other tasks. >> Right, so great point. You brought UiPath, and that's what we started with. What did you see as an investor, as an executive in UiPath both the technology and the team and their execution, that led you guys to go in on this big round? >> Yeah so we did a pretty deep dive across the entire RPA landscape. Listen, you couldn't ignore the momentum, right? We say don't fight gravity. We saw the momentum of the RPA market accelerating, and the way I like to describe it, it went from a push market where people have to push their technology into the enterprise, to now it's a pull market where the enterprise is pulling the technology in. Now they're looking for the best solution. So we recognized the growth in the RPA market, to your point, just in the last two or three years, it's really accelerated. And then as we looked at the landscape, we had the opportunity to spend time with Daniel, the co-founder and CEO, and I think there was a few things that stood to us around UiPath. Number one, Daniel is a very unique founder. He's been at this for years and his level of perseverance and commitment to make this a very successful company is unwavering. The fact that they're global in nature already, this is a company who started in Bucharest, expanded internationally and expanded to the US simultaneously so they're covering the three major geographies around the world already today even at an early stage of the company. Which is very, very important for someone when you're an investor to say, wow, what's your global footprint? So we had to help them get into these markets. Today they're established around the world. >> They're already there. >> They're in Japan. They're across Europe, because of where they originated. They have a new headquarters in New York, and they're hiring rapidly. The second is we think their technology that exists today in the roadmap, where they're going in the future, was very powerful. And they're going to continue to implement more and more, if you will, AI into their platform. The other thing that we were impressed with was the fact that they are customer focused. They're very customer centric. And they built a global footprint to support their global customers, and they've had to do that because of the rapid acceleration of the product. They think they're getting like six new enterprise customers a day. >> Wow >> On the UiPath platform. And if you're going to do that in a global footprint, you have to have support around the world. And they're maniacal about how they support their customers. So all of this led to us looking at the market, recognizing the RPA growth and saying, UiPath is the company we want to bet on and we couldn't be more excited to be part of the company, and to help them on their journey as they continue to grow. >> Yeah, well we're excited to go to our first UiPath Americas Forward, Forward America, I got it right. Yeah, we'll be there next week, it's in the Fontainebleau hotel in Miami. And we're looking forward, 'cause like you said, it seemed to come out of nowhere. But as typically is the case, right? Always an overnight success, 10 years in the making, we're just late to see. >> Yeah, they have conferences they've been doing around the world, Jeff, UiPath. And every conference they do, including Japan, it's like a standing room only, because there is so much interest in this technology, and again I think anything associated with automating your infrastructure, moving to a new digitalized world, and everyone has a digital strategy first kind of mentality in the enterprise, these people fit right in, smack in the middle of that. >> Yeah, well, clearly the valuation speaks to that, as market validation. >> Yeah. >> So no doubt about it, Well Carl, thanks for taking a few minutes out of your busy day. Glad to hear the VC life is treating you well. >> Well, thanks for having me. It's good to see you guys again back here on theCUBE. It's always fun spending time with you, and thanks for your interest in UiPath and RPA. I think it's a really exciting market, and I'm quite confident we'll continue to accelerate at unprecedented rates. >> Alright, well great. Well, thanks a lot Carl. He's Carl, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE. We're having a CUBEConversation at our Palo Alto studio. Taking a break from the conference season, but we'll be heading back on the road soon. Thanks for watching. >> Thank you. (dramatic music)
SUMMARY :
Carl, great to see you again. Great to be here. You've been in the VC world I've really enjoyed it and to be working at Sequoia, You know, Jerry Chen is on all the time, from Greylock. to be at Sequoia like I did. And it really points to the opportunity, I spend the majority of my time, as you could imagine, all the fat out of the supply chain, and huge opportunities to get more value out, And by doing that you become more automated, and start to build those new processes. And oh, by the way, the bot can work 24 hours a day. the store, and the network are to a point And I can repurpose those people to do other tasks. and the team and their execution, and the way I like to describe it, And they're going to continue to implement So all of this led to us looking at the market, And we're looking forward, 'cause like you said, in the enterprise, these people fit right in, Yeah, well, clearly the valuation speaks to that, Glad to hear the VC life is treating you well. It's good to see you guys again back here on theCUBE. Taking a break from the conference season, (dramatic music)
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sequoia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Martin Casado | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sept 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jerry Chen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jerry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
45 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sequoia Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Herrod | PERSON | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Miami | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Daniel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
29 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bucharest | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24 hours a day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fontainebleau | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Nicira | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
RPA | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Today | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
UiPath | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
six new enterprise customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
three major geographies | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first instantiations | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
five humans | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
almost 15 years | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
last couple of years | DATE | 0.83+ |
Greylock | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
last | DATE | 0.63+ |
CUBEConversation | EVENT | 0.63+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
interviews | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
*** DO NOT USE *** Carl Eschenbach, Sequoia Capital | CUBEConversation, Sept 2018
(dramatic music) >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are in our Palo Alto studios having a CUBEConversation. We have a itty bitty little break in the middle of this crazy conference season. Next week, we're back on the road. And one of the places we're going is UiPath Forward Americas. It's our first time to the UiPath user conference. They're all about the RPA, robotic process automation, which is a super hot space and we're really excited to have with us today Carl Eschenbach. He's a partner at Sequoia Capital, who just came in on UiPath's latest round of funding. Which was pretty significant. You can read all about it in the papers as they say. So we're excited to have Carl here. Carl, great to see you again. >> Great to be here. Thanks for having me, Jeff. >> Absolutely, so we of course known you for years and years and years, you had a long, illustrious career at VMware. You've been in the VC world at Sequoia for a couple of years. How are you liking the transition to VC? >> I really enjoyed it. I had a great many year run, almost 15 years at VMware. I was thankful for it, but the transition to Sequoia, I don't think it could have gone any better. I've really enjoyed it and to be working at Sequoia, which is a tremendous platform behind you, with 45 years of rich history, is just a privilege. And leveraging my operating experience of 29 years, now putting it to work through the Sequoia brand, has been pretty exciting for me. I'm very thankful. >> It's been a pretty good run for former VMware guys, in VC. You know, Jerry Chen is on all the time, from Greylock. There's a number of you guys out there. >> Yeah, there's a number. I think Jerry, I think Steve Herrod's now. You know, Martin Casado who was the founder of Nicira, that we bought at VMware was at VC, so there's a bunch of people who have proliferated the VC market, but none of them got the opportunity to be at Sequoia like I did. So I feel very privileged. >> And it really points to the opportunity, the continue innovation opportunity in the enterprise space. 'Cause you're not investing in dating apps, or autonomous vehicles, maybe autonomous vehicles, I don't know, but it's really more the enterprise opportunity continues to be rich with new, kind of transformative opportunities. >> Yeah I think that's right. I spend the majority of my time, as you could imagine, in the enterprise, that's where I grew up, and my operating experience is all in the enterprise deep infrastructure, so I leverage that experience here at Sequoia, focusing on the enterprise. Both infrastructure, hardware, software, public, private cloud, SaaS. So anything associated with offerings in the enterprise, is where I focus and I'll tell you, over the last few years it's been a really rich environment for an investor to think about what's happening in the enterprise as people still are looking for technologies to transform their business at such a rapid rate. Both on premise and obviously with the cloud environment, it's not if, it's when and how fast people ultimately move into the cloud. >> Right, it fascinates me how we continue to uncover these huge buckets of inefficiency. I mean, you think, I used to tease my friends at a center, tease them that you guys wrang all the fat out of the supply chain, now everything's on back order all the time. >> Yeah. >> But we still find huge chunks of inefficiency, and huge opportunities to get more value out, which is I think, one of the fundamental differences in this kind of stock round up and this productivity. It's real, it's not just smoke and mirrors, there are huge still opportunities. >> Yeah, no I agree, I mean, listen, there are huge opportunities to drive gains and productivity. One of the things we're going to talk about is RPA, for example. How do you automate your enterprise to move towards a digitized world? And by doing that you become more automated, which just drives your productivity, your people that much higher, so I think with the ever increasing use of AI and machine learning, getting deeper, deeper integrated into enterprise solutions. It makes things that much more automated, which impacts the productivity of your people, which hopefully has great returns on both your top line growth and bottom line savings. >> Right, so let's dig into that, 'cause business process automation has been around for a long time. I was teasing about a center, you know you bring 'em in and they spend a lot of time, and they map a bunch of stuff out and they change a lot of things. RPA, robotic process automation, which is a relatively new term, I didn't hear about it 'til relatively recently, is a very different approach to automation, than just hiring in all the consultants. It's about actually letting machines learn, listen, and start to build those new processes. >> Yeah, if you think about the BPO world, BPO was still and is still a very manual human intensive activity. To your point, you're bringing on all these people. You do an outsource and then but there's still someone there, you know, doing data entry, and doing very mundane, kind of easy work. But it's all human driven. And people used to try to solve this by going to offshore locations, with lower cost opportunities, where you can get a workforce that's much cheaper, than here in the states. But again it was all human driven. Now with the advent of something like RPA, that can be substituted with software, and software bots or robots. And by doing that it just drives up the efficiency at which you're doing everything in your older system. So, that's why we've seen such a rapid acceleration that you can't ignore around RPA. Just over the last couple of years this has accelerated extremely quickly, the technology's become a lot more mature, people are starting to implement it, it's one of the first instantiations of AI in the enterprise. And if you think about it, Jeff, implementing a software bot that may replace, three, four, five humans. And oh, by the way, the bot can work 24 hours a day. Oh, by the way, the accuracy rate of the bot is probably significantly higher than a human, so the ROI and the value proposition around RPA is very straightforward. You can't ignore the value it brings. And everyone as you know is always looking to save cost, but it does more than just save cost. It actually starts to impact your top line revenue growth. Because you can take those humans, who used to do those mundane tasks, and you can repurpose them to work on, if you will, revenue generating, profitable activities, while the software bots take care of all the automation of your older legacy systems. >> Right, and it's even, not even, its little things. I'm never amazed, right? I do a ton of interviews, we talk about automation all of the time. I still do a whole lot of manual stuff, that I would much rather have my robotic assistant help me do, simple things like you know, make sure that we get the picture out from this interview, you know, after the fact. All these little mundane tasks that the sum total of which are a lot of activity, and then as you said, I think the other really important piece is the accuracy, right? When you, unfortunately, with computers, unfortunately, they only like to do it the way they get set up to do it. They're not really good at errors so much, so once you set it up. But you know, this RPA is different in that the people aren't doing it, they're actually letting the robots do it so VMware early days of virtualization, now we're getting to the point where the compute, the store, and the network are to a point where you get the horsepower to support this type of function. >> Yes. >> I didn't have it in the past. >> Yep, yeah and with RPA, I think, one of the things that's pretty neat, is people are starting to implement RPA, and they're always finding new use cases for it. And once they get some experience in programming these software bots, right, they start to realize well maybe we can implement this in this other area. So it may start in a finance organization, and it may move into, you know, automating cost centers, or automating what you're doing in sales, or sales operations, so there's many opportunities, once it's implemented once to find other use cases. And actually, you're starting to see people become software bot developers. Like they have to set up these bots to implement 'em in their environment. So people have to learn how to program these bots, and then implement 'em. So there's an ecosystem that's starting to be established around the RPA industry. You mentioned some of the Accentures of the world, they're the old BPOs. There's some of the biggest customers of people like UiPath because what they do is they say, wow, today we're solving this with humans, but if I could solve this now with software, in RPA and technology, like UiPath is providing, I can drive up my margins because I'm doing it through the use of software. And I can repurpose those people to do other tasks. >> Right, so great point. You brought UiPath, and that's what we started with. What did you see as an investor, as an executive in UiPath both the technology and the team and their execution, that led you guys to go in on this big round? >> Yeah so we did a pretty deep dive across the entire RPA landscape. Listen, you couldn't ignore the momentum, right? We say don't fight gravity. We saw the momentum of the RPA market accelerating, and the way I like to describe it, it went from a push market where people have to push their technology into the enterprise, to now it's a pull market where the enterprise is pulling the technology in. Now they're looking for the best solution. So we recognized the growth in the RPA market, to your point, just in the last two or three years, it's really accelerated. And then as we looked at the landscape, we had the opportunity to spend time with Daniel, the co-founder and CEO, and I think there was a few things that stood to us around UiPath. Number one, Daniel is a very unique founder. He's been at this for years and his level of perseverance and commitment to make this a very successful company is unwavering. The fact that they're global in nature already, this is a company who started in Bucharest, expanded internationally and expanded to the US simultaneously so they're covering the three major geographies around the world already today even at an early stage of the company. Which is very, very important for someone when you're an investor to say, wow, what's your global footprint? So we had to help them get into these markets. Today they're established around the world. >> They're already there. >> They're in Japan. They're across Europe, because of where they originated. They have a new headquarters in New York, and they're hiring rapidly. The second is we think their technology that exists today in the roadmap, where they're going in the future, was very powerful. And they're going to continue to implement more and more, if you will, AI into their platform. The other thing that we were impressed with was the fact that they are customer focused. They're very customer centric. And they built a global footprint to support their global customers, and they've had to do that because of the rapid acceleration of the product. They think they're getting like six new enterprise customers a day. >> Wow >> On the UiPath platform. And if you're going to do that in a global footprint, you have to have support around the world. And they're maniacal about how they support their customers. So all of this led to us looking at the market, recognizing the RPA growth and saying, UiPath is the company we want to bet on and we couldn't be more excited to be part of the company, and to help them on their journey as they continue to grow. >> Yeah, well we're excited to go to our first UiPath Americas Forward, Forward America, I got it right. Yeah, we'll be there next week, it's in the Fontainebleau hotel in Miami. And we're looking forward, 'cause like you said, it seemed to come out of nowhere. But as typically is the case, right? Always an overnight success, 10 years in the making, we're just late to see. >> Yeah, they have conferences they've been doing around the world, Jeff, UiPath. And every conference they do, including Japan, it's like a standing room only, because there is so much interest in this technology, and again I think anything associated with automating your infrastructure, moving to a new digitalized world, and everyone has a digital strategy first kind of mentality in the enterprise, these people fit right in, smack in the middle of that. >> Yeah, well, clearly the valuation speaks to that, as market validation. >> Yeah. >> So no doubt about it, Well Carl, thanks for taking a few minutes out of your busy day. Glad to hear the VC life is treating you well. >> Well, thanks for having me. It's good to see you guys again back here on theCUBE. It's always fun spending time with you, and thanks for your interest in UiPath and RPA. I think it's a really exciting market, and I'm quite confident we'll continue to accelerate at unprecedented rates. >> Alright, well great. Well, thanks a lot Carl. He's Carl, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE. We're having a CUBEConversation at our Palo Alto studio. Taking a break from the conference season, but we'll be heading back on the road soon. Thanks for watching. >> Thank you. (dramatic music)
SUMMARY :
in the papers as they say. Great to be here. You've been in the VC world the transition to Sequoia, all the time, from Greylock. to be at Sequoia like I did. in the enterprise space. in the enterprise, that's where I grew up, all the fat out of the supply chain, the fundamental differences One of the things we're going and start to build those new processes. of AI in the enterprise. the store, and the network are to a point Accentures of the world, and the team and their execution, and the way I like to describe it, because of the rapid So all of this led to us it's in the Fontainebleau hotel in Miami. in the enterprise, these Yeah, well, clearly the Glad to hear the VC life It's good to see you guys back on the road soon. (dramatic music)
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sequoia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Martin Casado | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jerry Chen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jerry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sept 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Herrod | PERSON | 0.99+ |
45 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sequoia Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Miami | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
29 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Daniel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Bucharest | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24 hours a day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fontainebleau | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Nicira | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
RPA | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Today | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
UiPath | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
six new enterprise customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three major geographies | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
almost 15 years | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first instantiations | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
five humans | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
last couple of years | DATE | 0.83+ |
CUBEConversation | EVENT | 0.72+ |
Greylock | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
last | DATE | 0.65+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
years | DATE | 0.63+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
interviews | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
Cortnie Abercrombie & Carl Gerber | MIT CDOIQ 2018
>> Live from the MIT campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE, covering the 12th Annual MIT Chief Data Officer and Information Quality Symposium. Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. >> Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of MIT CDOIQ here in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I'm your host Rebecca Knight along with my cohost Peter Burris. We have two guests on this segment. We have Cortnie Abercrombie, she is the founder of the nonprofit AI Truth, and Carl Gerber, who is the managing partner at Global Data Analytics Leaders. Thanks so much for coming on theCUBE Cortnie and Carl. >> Thank you. >> Thank you. >> So I want to start by just having you introduce yourselves to our viewers, what you do. So tell us a little bit about AI Truth, Cortnie. >> So this was born out of a passion. As I, the last gig I had at IBM, everybody knows me for chief data officer and what I did with that, but the more recent role that I had was developing custom offerings for Fortune 500 in the AI solutions area, so as I would go meet and see different clients, and talk with them and start to look at different processes for how you implement AI solutions, it became very clear that not everybody is attuned, just because they're the ones funding the project or even initiating the purpose of the project, the business leaders don't necessarily know how these things work or run or what can go wrong with them. And on the flip side of that, we have very ambitious up-and-comer-type data scientists who are just trying to fulfill the mission, you know, the talent at hand, and they get really swept up in it. To the point where you can even see that data's getting bartered back and forth with any real governance over it or policies in place to say, "Hey, is that right? Should we have gotten that kind of information?" Which leads us into things like the creepy factor. Like, you know target (laughs) and some of these cases that are well-known. And so, as I saw some of these mistakes happening that were costing brand reputation, our return on investment, or possibly even creating opportunities for risk for the companies and for the business leaders, I felt like someone's got to take one for the team here and go out and start educating people on how this stuff actually works, what the issues can be and how to prevent those issues, and then also what do you do when things do go wrong, how do you fix it? So that's the mission of AI Truth and I have a book. Yes, power to the people, but you know really my main concern was concerned individuals, because I think we've all been affected when we've sent and email and all of a sudden we get a weird ad, and we're like, "Hey, what, they should not, is somebody reading my email?" You know, and we feel this, just, offense-- >> And the answer is yes. >> Yes, and they are, they are. So I mean, we, but we need to know because the only way we can empower ourselves to do something is to actually know how it works. So, that's what my missions is to try and do. So, for the concerned individuals out there, I am writing a book to kind of encapsulate all the experiences that I had so people know where to look and what they can actually do, because you'll be less fearful if you know, "Hey, I can download DuckDuckGo for my browser, or my search engine I mean, and Epic for my browser, and some private, you know, private offerings instead of the typical free offerings. There's not an answer for Facebook yet though. >> So, (laughs) we'll get there. Carl, tell us a little bit about Global Data Analytics Leaders. >> So, I launched Analytics Leaders and CDO Coach after a long career in corporate America. I started building an executive information system when I was in the military for a four-star commander, and I've really done a lot in data analytics throughout my career. Most recently, starting a CDO function at two large multinational companies in leading global transformation programs. And, what I've experienced is even though the industries may vary a little bit, the challenges are the same and the patterns of behavior are the same, both the good and bad behavior, bad habits around the data. And, through the course of my career, I've developed these frameworks and playbooks and just ways to get a repeatable outcome and bring these new technologies like machine learning to bear to really overcome the challenges that I've seen. And what I've seen is a lot of the current thinking is we're solving these data management problems manually. You know, we all hear the complaints about the people who are analysts and data scientists spending 70, 80% of their time being a data gatherer and not really generating insight from the data itself and making it actionable. Well, that's why we have computer systems, right? But that large-scale technology in automation hasn't really served us well, because we think in silos, right? We fund these projects based on departments and divisions. We acquire companies through mergers and acquisitions. And the CDO role has emerged because we need to think about this, all the data that an enterprise uses, horizontally. And with that, I bring a high degree of automation, things like machine learning, to solve those problems. So, I'm now bottling that and advising my clients. And at the same time, the CDO role is where the CIO role was 20 years ago. We're really in it's infancy, and so you see companies define it differently, have different expectations. People are filling the roles that may have not done this before, and so I provide the coaching services there. It's like a professional golfer who has a swing coach. So I come in and I help the data executives with upping their game. >> Well, it's interesting, I actually said the CIO role 40 years ago. But, here's why. If we look back in the 1970s, hardcore financial systems were made possible by the technology which allowed us to run businesses like a portfolio: Jack Welch, the GE model. That was not possible if you didn't have a common asset management system, if you didn't have a common cached management system, etc. And so, when we started creating those common systems, we needed someone that could describe how that shared asset was going to be used within the organization. And we went from the DP manager in HR, the DP manager within finance, to the CIO. And in many respects, we're doing the same thing, right? We're talking about data in a lot of different places and now the business is saying, "We can bring this data together in new and interesting ways into more a shared asset, and we need someone that can help administer that process, and you know, navigate between different groups and different needs and whatnot." Is that kind of what you guys are seeing? >> Oh yeah. >> Yeah. >> Well you know once I get to talking (laughs). For me, I can going right back to the newer technologies like AI and IOT that are coming from externally into your organization, and then also the fact that we're seeing bartering at an unprec... of data at an unprecedented level before. And yet, what the chief data officer role originally did was look at data internally, and structured data mostly. But now, we're asking them to step out of their comfort zone and start looking at all these unknown, niche data broker firms that may or may not be ethical in how they're... I mean, I... look I tell people, "If you hear the word scrape, you run." No scraping, we don't want scraped data, no, no, no (laugh). But I mean, but that's what we're talking about-- >> Well, what do you mean by scraped data, 'cause that's important? >> Well, this is a well-known data science practice. And it's not that... nobody's being malicious here, nobody's trying to have a malintent, but I think it's just data scientists are just scruffy, they roll up their sleeves and they get data however they can. And so, the practice emerged. Look, they're built off of open-source software and everything's free, right, for them, for the most part? So they just start reading in screens and things that are available that you could see, they can optical character read it in, or they can do it however without having to have a subscription to any of that data, without having to have permission to any of that data. It's, "I can see it, so it's mine." But you know, that doesn't work in candy stores. We can't just go, or jewelry stores in my case, I mean, you can't just say, "I like that diamond earring, or whatever, I'm just going to take it because I can see it." (laughs) So, I mean, yeah we got to... that's scraping though. >> And the implications of that are suddenly now you've got a great new business initiative and somebody finds out that you used their private data in that initiative, and now they've got a claim on that asset. >> Right. And this is where things start to get super hairy, and you just want to make sure that you're being on the up-and-up with your data practices and you data ethics, because, in my opinion, 90% of what's gone wrong in AI or the fear factor of AI is that your privacy's getting violated and then you're labeled with data that you may or may not know even exists half the time. I mean. >> So, what's the answer? I mean as you were talking about these data scientists are scrappy, scruffy, roll-up-your-sleeves kind of people, and they are coming up with new ideas, new innovations that sometimes are good-- >> Oh yes, they are. >> So what, so what is the answer? Is this this code of ethics? Is it a... sort of similar to a Hippocratic Oath? I mean how would you, what do you think? >> So, it's a multidimensional problem. Cortnie and I were talking earlier that you have to have more transparency into the models you're creating, and that means a significant validation process. And that's where the chief data officer partners with folks in risk and other areas and the data science team around getting more transparency and visibility into what's the data that's feeding into it? Is it really the authoritative data of the company? And as Cortnie points out, do we even have the rights to that data that's feeding our models? And so, by bringing that transparency and a little more validation before you actually start making key, bet-the-business decisions on the outcomes of these models, you need to look at how you're vetting them. >> And the vetting process is part technology, part culture, part process, it goes back to that people process technology trying. >> Yeah, absolutely, know where your data came from. Why are you doing this model? What are you doing to do with the outcomes? Are you actually going to do something with it or are you going to ignore it? Under what conditions will you empower a decision-maker to use the information that is the output of the model? A lot of these things, you have to think through when you want to operationalize it. It's not just, "I'm going to go get a bunch of data wherever I can, I put a model together. Here, don't you like the results?" >> But this is Silicon Valley way, right? An MVP for everything and you just let it run until... you can't. >> That's a great point Cortnie (laughs) I've always believed, and I want to test this with you, we talk about people process technology about information, we never talk about people process technology and information of information. There's a manner of respects what we're talking about is making explicit the information about... information, the metadata, and how we manage that and how we treat that, and how we defuse that, and how we turn that, the metadata itself, into models to try to govern and guide utilization of this. That's especially important in AI world, isn't it? >> I start with this. For me, it's simple, I mean, but everything he said was true. But, I try to keep it to this: it's about free will. If I said you can do that with my data, to me it's always my data. I don't care if it's on Facebook, I don't care where it is and I don't care if it's free or not, it's still my data. Even if it's X23andMe, or 23andMe, sorry, and they've taken the swab, or whether it's Facebook or I did a google search, I don't care, it's still my data. So if you ask me if it's okay to do a certain type of thing, then maybe I will consent to that. But I should at least be given an option. And no, be given the transparency. So it's all about free will. So in my mind, as long as you're always providing some sort of free will (laughs), the ability for me to having a decision to say, "Yes, I want to participate in that," or, "Yes, you can label me as whatever label I'm getting, Trump or a pro-Hillary or Obam-whatever, name whatever issue of the day is," then I'm okay with that as long as I get a choice. >> Let's go back to it, I want to build on that if I can, because, and then I want to ask you a question about it Carl, the issue of free will presupposes that both sides know exactly what's going into the data. So for example, if I have a medical procedure, I can sit down on that form and I can say, "Whatever happens is my responsibility." But if bad things happen because of malfeasance, guess what? That piece of paper's worthless and I can sue. Because the doctor and the medical provider is supposed to know more about what's going on than I do. >> Right. >> Does the same thing exist? You talked earlier about governance and some of the culture imperatives and transparency, doesn't that same thing exist? And I'm going to ask you a question: is that part of your nonprofit is to try to raise the bar for everybody? But doesn't that same notion exist, that at the end of the day, you don't... You do have information asymmetries, both sides don't know how the data's being used because of the nature of data? >> Right. That's why you're seeing the emergence of all these data privacy laws. And so what I'm advising executives and the board and my clients is we need to step back and think bigger about this. We need to think about as not just GDPR, the European scope, it's global data privacy. And if we look at the motivation, why are we doing this? Are we doing it just because we have to be regulatory-compliant 'cause there's a law in the books, or should we reframe it and say, "This is really about the user experience, the customer experience." This is a touchpoint that my customers have with my company. How transparent should I be with what data I have about you, how I'm using it, how I'm sharing it, and is there a way that I can turn this into a positive instead of it's just, "I'm doing this because I have to for regulatory-compliance." And so, I believe if you really examine the motivation and look at it from more of the carrot and less of the stick, you're going to find that you're more motivated to do it, you're going to be more transparent with your customers, and you're going to share, and you're ultimately going to protect that data more closely because you want to build that trust with your customers. And then lastly, let's face it, this is the data we want to analyze, right? This is the authenticated data we want to give to the data scientists, so I just flip that whole thing on its head. We do for these reasons and we increase the transparency and trust. >> So Cortnie, let me bring it back to you. >> Okay. >> That presupposes, again, an up-leveling of knowledge about data privacy not just for the executive but also for the consumer. How are you going to do that? >> Personally, I'm going to come back to free will again, and I'm also going to add: harm impacts. We need to start thinking impact assessments instead of governance, quite frankly. We need to start looking at if I, you know, start using a FICO score as a proxy for another piece of information, like a crime record in a certain district of whatever, as a way to understand how responsible you are and whether or not your car is going to get broken into, and now you have to pay more. Well, you're... if you always use a FICO score, for example, as a proxy for responsibility which, let's face it, once a data scientist latches onto something, they share it with everybody 'cause that's how they are, right? They love that and I love that about them, quite frankly. But, what I don't like is it propagates, and then before you know it, the people who are of lesser financial means, it's getting propagated because now they're going to be... Every AI pricing model is going to use FICO score as a-- >> And they're priced out of the market. >> And they're priced out of the market and how is that fair? And there's a whole group, I think you know about the Fairness Accountability Transparency group that, you know, kind of watch dogs this stuff. But I think business leaders as a whole don't really think through to that level like, "If I do this, then this this and this could incur--" >> So what would be the one thing you could say if, corporate America's listening. >> Let's do impact. Let's do impact assessments. If you're going to cost someone their livelihood, or you're going to cost them thousands of dollars, then let's put more scrutiny, let's put more government validation. To your point, let's put some... 'cause not everything needs the nth level. Like, if I present you with a blue sweater instead of a red sweater on google or whatever, (laughs) You know, that's not going to harm you. But it will harm you if I give you a teacher assessment that's based on something that you have no control over, and now you're fired because you've been laid off 'cause your rating was bad. >> This is a great conversation. Let me... Let me add something different, 'cause... Or say it a different way, and tell me if you agree. In many respects, it's: Does this practice increase inclusion or does this practice decrease inclusion? This is not some goofy, social thing, this is: Are you making your market bigger or are you making your market smaller? Because the last thing you want is that the participation by people ends with: You can't play because of some algorithmic response we had. So maybe the question of inclusion becomes a key issue. Would you agree with that? >> I do agree with it, and I still think there's levels even to inclusion. >> Of course. >> Like, you know, being a part of the blue sweater club versus the (laughs) versus, "I don't want to be a convict," you know, suddenly because of some record you found, or association with someone else. And let's just face it, a lot of these algorithmic models do do these kinds of things where they... They use n+1, you know, a lot... you know what I'm saying. And so you're associated naturally with the next person closest to you, and that's not always the right thing to do, right? So, in some ways, and so I'm positing just little bit of a new idea here, you're creating some policies, whether you're being, and we were just talking about this, but whether you're being implicit about them or explicit, more likely you're being implicit because you're just you're summarily deciding. Well, okay, I have just decided in the credit score example, that if you don't have a good credit threshold... But where in your policies and your corporate policy did it ever say that people of lesser financial means should be excluded from being able to have good car insurance for... 'cause now, the same goes with like Facebook. Some people feel like they're going to have to opt of of life, I mean, if they don't-- >> (laughs) Opt out of life. >> I mean like, seriously, when you think about grandparents who are excluded, you know, out in whatever Timbuktu place they live, and all their families are somewhere else, and the only way that they get to see is, you know, on Facebook. >> Go back to the issue you raised earlier about "Somebody read my email," I can tell you, as a person with a couple of more elderly grandparents, they inadvertently shared some information with me on Facebook about a health condition that they had. You know how grotesque the response of Facebook was to that? And, it affected me to because they had my name in it. They didn't know any better. >> Sometimes there's a stigma. Sometimes things become a stigma as well. There's an emotional response. When I put the article out about why I left IBM to start this new AI Truth nonprofit, the responses I got back that were so immediate were emotional responses about how this stuff affects people. That they're scared of what this means. Can people come after my kids or my grandkids? And if you think about how genetic information can get used, you're not just hosing yourself. I mean, breast cancer genes, I believe, aren't they, like... They run through families, so, I-- >> And they're pretty well-understood. >> If someone swabs my, and uses it and swaps it with other data, you know, people, all of a sudden, not just me is affected, but my whole entire lineage, I mean... It's hard to think of that, but... it's true (laughs). >> These are real life and death... these are-- >> Not just today, but for the future. And in many respects, it's that notion of inclusion... Going back to it, now I'm making something up, but not entirely, but going back to some of the stuff that you were talking about, Carl, the decisions we make about data today, we want to ensure that we know that there's value in the options for how we use that data in the future. So, the issue of inclusion is not just about people, but it's also about other activities, or other things that we might be able to do with data because of the nature of data. I think we always have to have an options approach to thinking about... as we make data decisions. Would you agree with that? Yes, because you know, data's not absolute. So, you can measure something and you can look at the data quality, you can look at the inputs to a model, whatever, but you still have to have that human element of, "Are you we doing the right thing?" You know, the data should guide us in our decisions, but I don't think it's ever an absolute. It's a range of options, and we chose this options for this reason. >> Right, so are we doing the right thing and do no harm too? Carl, Cortnie, we could talk all day, this has been a really fun conversation. >> Oh yeah, and we have. (laughter) >> But we're out of time. I'm Rebecca Knight for Peter Burris, we will have more from MIT CDOIQ in just a little bit. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. she is the founder of the nonprofit AI Truth, So I want to start by just having you To the point where you can even see that and some private, you know, private offerings Carl, tell us a little bit about and not really generating insight from the data itself and you know, navigate between different groups Well you know once I get to talking (laughs). And so, the practice emerged. and somebody finds out that you used and you just want to make sure that you're being on the Is it a... sort of similar to a Hippocratic Oath? that you have to have more transparency And the vetting process is part technology, A lot of these things, you have to think through An MVP for everything and you just let it run until... the metadata, and how we manage that the ability for me to having a decision to say, because, and then I want to ask you a question about it Carl, that at the end of the day, you don't... This is the authenticated data we want to give How are you going to do that? and now you have to pay more. And there's a whole group, I think you know about So what would be the one thing you could say if, But it will harm you if I give you a teacher assessment Because the last thing you want is that I do agree with it, and I still think there's levels and that's not always the right thing to do, right? and the only way that they get to see is, you know, Go back to the issue you raised earlier about And if you think about how genetic information can get used, and uses it and swaps it with other data, you know, people, in the options for how we use that data in the future. and do no harm too? Oh yeah, and we have. we will have more from MIT CDOIQ in just a little bit.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cortnie Abercrombie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cortnie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Trump | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Gerber | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jack Welch | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hillary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
four-star | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1970s | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cambridge, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Obam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
40 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
DuckDuckGo | TITLE | 0.98+ |
thousands of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Timbuktu | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
America | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
FICO | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.98+ |
MIT CDOIQ | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ | |
12th Annual MIT Chief Data Officer and Information Quality Symposium | EVENT | 0.93+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
AI Truth | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
70, 80% | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Global Data Analytics Leaders | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.83+ |
CDO Coach | TITLE | 0.82+ |
Hippocratic Oath | TITLE | 0.82+ |
two large multinational companies | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
half | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
Fairness | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
X23andMe | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
23andMe | ORGANIZATION | 0.66+ |
Analytics | ORGANIZATION | 0.64+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
European | OTHER | 0.59+ |
blue sweater | ORGANIZATION | 0.58+ |
Epic | ORGANIZATION | 0.5+ |
Fortune | ORGANIZATION | 0.48+ |
1 | QUANTITY | 0.46+ |
CDOIQ | EVENT | 0.36+ |
500 | QUANTITY | 0.35+ |
Carl Jaspersohn & Jason O'Brien, Boston Architectural College | WTG Transform 2018
from Boston Massachusetts it's the cube covering wtg transform 2018 brought to you by Winslow technology group welcome back I'm Stu minimun and you're watching the cube at wtg transform 2018 happy to welcome to the program two gentlemen from the Boston Architectural College to my left is Carl Jasperson who is the systems administrator and to his left is Jason O'Brien who's the director of IT gentlemen thanks so much for joining us thank you for having us all right so Jason why don't we start with you help us power up this conversation to tell us a little bit about the college so Boston Architectural college we started in the late 1800s it's a small design at school and we offer programs in landscape interior and traditional architecture yeah so I love that to talk to a little bit more about you know that the charter of the school and how IT fits into that so we we are a mission of the schools to provide excellent education to a diverse population technology factors in is very important and over the last ten years the Carll I've been at the school technology has use has increased immensely our students are using it more and more every year and meeting those needs has become you know difficult and it's a challenge we we strive to achieve every year well Design Thinking is is so important these days I I studied engineering as an undergrad in which I've learned more about design one of my favorite authors so I have an interview about a month ago Walter Isaacson you know the ones he studies are the ones that can take that design thinking and technology and bring them together Carles bring us up to speed on from from the IT standpoint you know how big of a team do you have what are you involved with I said you know things have been changing over the last few years yeah so I mean we've got Jason in addition to running the department he runs our online learning system I'm responsible for all the backend its infrastructure servers networking backup virtualization we recently hired a junior systems administrator to help me out we've got a web guy we've got a DBA to the woodshop is under IT because we have a fabrication guy so 3d printing laser cutting we have the help desk and the help desk manager who also does our purchasing and she and I will take escalations so it's there's not a lot of crossover you know skill crossover in the group but we managed to keep everything going yeah but as you said they've been you know woodworking not something you think of in Italy as you know an IT thing IT an OT or you know really converging a lot when you talk about manufacturing as you know we talk about sensors and IOT it's it's hitting everywhere yeah for us you know 3d printing and laser cutting and we also have a CNC router they all started as experiments at the school and have turned into a major factor in for our students it's a resource that they demand and the increasing use every single year and how we meet those demands is is becoming tricky to accomplish in our you know we're in the Back Bay real estate is very expensive and we have to make our space do amazing things Jason that's great points I mean I've talked to lots of higher education and even you talk to the K 2 through 12 it was you know what mobility has had a huge impact you know therefore stresses and strains on wireless you know how do I get devices into the classroom how do I manage it I had gentleman from bu who's here at the show last year we were talking a lot about MOOCs so you know it's that that role of i TS but it's expanding but luckily they're throwing way more money at you I'm sure well we've been flat headcount over the last eight years we lost someone last year and gain someone this year so you know we we basically have to do more with less every year like most IT departments so you know we've we redesign our spaces periodically to meet those our students needs you know and turn returning what was labs just computer labs into more flexible space where students are can move the tables around and you the computers are available sometimes there we have high end alien wares in a in a cabinet they pull out news or they can use it to make models we have they can put up their designs on a 3d TV they're using VR headsets to walk around their own designs it's really fascinating where the technologies okay I wish we could spend more time anywhere in VR stuff and everything like that our production crews gamers my son's into this stuff but but Karl I'm hearing things like space constrained we need to do more with less we need to simplify this environment wow that seems like a really good set up for kind of infrastructure modernization so how long have you guys been there about 10 years right yeah so it's a change don't want one in ten years so walk us back 10 years ago and give us that point when you went to modernize yeah well when we started there's no virtualization 3 server racks in a room in the basement for 10 years that we've been there there's been water in that room twice so that always gave us the warm fuzzies you're saying it wasn't water cooling I mean no we tried for that but it didn't you know it didn't work out last year we moved to Colo facility in Summerville so and by the time we did that move yeah we did we started virtualization with VMware like three five within a year or two of me starting and the racks got you know less and less full and now in the fall we rolled out VX rail and we're in a single rack in a data center and there's I think three physical servers in that rack that aren't the VX rail at this point so it's it's consolidation power savings stuffs in a much better physical location than it used to be moving that server room out we were able to free up that space for you know the students to be able to have it's a it's a meditation space now so it's it's been really interesting kind of going through all that great what I wanted you know we don't have a ton of time but let's talk about that VX rail was your team were you looking for HCI was it you know just time for a server refresh you know what what kind of led to that was there a specific application that you started with so this event two years ago we saw Brian from bu give this presentation on their tan and that really turns us on to the whole hyper-converged option we we worked with Winslow we actually talked to another vendor and we looked at Nutanix we looked at pivot three we looked at rolling our own you know visa non FX 2 and after kind of comparing everything and seeing the pros and cons VX rail made the most sense from management perspective and a price perspective our old cluster was coming up on the five-year mark things were going out of warranty we had ecologic sand with 7200 rpm drives one gig I scuzzy just flow for most of its life we were just doing lightweight servers and applications two years ago we needed to virtualize our database server and we threw her Knicks in there with 800 gig on VM e drives and that was a great stopgap but you know we we needed something more permanent more robust - that's how we got to be X ray from a management standpoint the hyper-converged model gave us more flexibility it's easier to expand and since we're small we're not talking about you know racks and racks working together ryote you started with just three hosts so from a overview standpoint it's easy for us as we grow to just add another node and we get the compute we get the storage and we get the memory all at once as an expansion so it's the model is just fantastic for our workload that we put on it we've got like 70 servers in there the only stuff that's not in there yet is our student file server and exchange and they're going in there in the next six months yeah yeah good great and that's so so it sounds like you're real happy with the solution you've been with Dell for four years so from an Operations standpoint was there you know a lot of steep learning curve or was this pretty straightforward and very easy I mean I was I was already really familiar with the VMware piece going into this so that you know that wasn't a big deal we were already on Ruby sphere 6 and we started in the it's row of B so 6px role manager is it's kind of a stupid easy interface you know you can go in you can see are there alerts is there an update you know can it see my hardware is all that good there's not a whole lot to learn from there if we were doing V San on our own my understanding is that some a lot more complicated to stand up once you have it going you're good until you try to make a change so the VX rail manager extract abstracts all that away and just kind of gives you the the VMware experience that you're used to yeah any commentary on the economic service you know we actually found it was very interesting because our original assessment of our own needs were there was no way we could afford all flash and we started we focused exclusively on hybrid solutions and after a certain point we saw I think a presentation from Rick on the external platform and we saw the VX rail as inline dedupe and compression with the all flash and we thought wait maybe we could make this work with all flash and so we actually had a very slight reduction in RAW storage in our new platform but the percentage that we're actually consuming is far less than on our old platform simply because of those gains and it is the performance is far far faster and it's a we've just been very pleased with the implementation from a cost perspective the all-flash VX rail came in under the hybrid pivot 3 and the hybrid Nutanix products so you know we it was a huge win from that perspective we were shocked we could be able to do it thrilled with it ok final word it sounds like you're real happy with the solution when it smoothly operates well economics were good what final takeaways would you give for your peers I mean I'd say the implementation was you know the VX rail platform the the installation is as advertised it was it's basically a wizard that walks you through the installation process the very few minor issues we encountered the winslow team and the is EMC no support support people had no problem solving for us it was really a pretty easy migration to the new platform and we were able to do it with essentially zero downtime yeah awesome well gentlemen thanks so much for joining that's the promise is to get that easy button for IT HD I definitely helping to move in that direction next time we'll get to talk a little bit more about cloud and everything like that be back with lots more coverage here from wtg transform 2018 I'm Stu minimun thanks for watching the Q
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jason O'Brien | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jason | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Jasperson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boston Architectural College | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
7200 rpm | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Walter Isaacson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
four years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
800 gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Summerville | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Karl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Italy | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ruby sphere 6 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Colo | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boston Architectural college | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three hosts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Carl Jaspersohn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five-year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
70 servers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Boston Architectural College | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
late 1800s | DATE | 0.97+ |
Stu minimun | PERSON | 0.97+ |
ten years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
VX rail | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.97+ |
single rack | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
Winslow | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
two gentlemen | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
about 10 years | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Carles | PERSON | 0.93+ |
3 server racks | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
hybrid pivot 3 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.92+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Boston Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.91+ |
three physical servers | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
last eight years | DATE | 0.88+ |
about a month ago | DATE | 0.87+ |
next six months | DATE | 0.83+ |
San | TITLE | 0.82+ |
VX rail | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.74+ |
every single year | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
VX rail | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.7+ |
VX rail | ORGANIZATION | 0.69+ |
hybrid | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.67+ |
last few years | DATE | 0.65+ |
WTG Transform | ORGANIZATION | 0.64+ |
every | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
FX | TITLE | 0.58+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
2 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.55+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
last | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
12 | TITLE | 0.48+ |
K 2 | TITLE | 0.46+ |
6px | TITLE | 0.44+ |
HCI | ORGANIZATION | 0.44+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.4+ |
Carl Krupitzer, ThingLogix | AWS Summit SF 2017
(techno music) >> Announcer: Live, from San Francisco, it's theCUBE, covering AWS Summit 2017. Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. >> Hi, welcome back to theCUBE. We are live in San Francisco at the AWS Summit. We have a great day so far. I'm Lisa Martin, with Jeff Frick, and we're really excited to be joined next by ThingLogix, Carl Krupitzer from ThingLogix, welcome to theCUBE. >> Carl: Thank you. >> Tell us all about ThingLogix What do you guys do? And how do you work with AWS? >> Sure, so we're an IoT platform and solutions company. So we've actually helped customers design, develop, and deploy, and bring to market, IoT solutions and connected products. >> How long have you been, and tell us a little bit about your history. There's an Amazon tie in. >> Carl: There is. >> That kind of predates ThingLogix. >> Carl: Right. >> Give us a little bit of insight about that. >> So we were actually the services and solutions group with inside of a company called 2lemetry. And that was eventually purchased by Amazon and became the AWS IoT platform. So our DNA of our company goes back to the very beginnings of what is now the AWS IoT service. >> Excellent, and so you were founded in 2014? >> 2014, we spun out from 2lemetry. And we did so because we were working with a few big customers that really, we saw an opportunity to help companies really kind of figure out what to do with IoT and accelerate their adoption of IoT inside of the enterprise. >> So there's a consulting arm as well as a technology lead. >> Right, right. So we have our professional services, and our advisory services group that works with customers, really to get them through the idea phase, and then we offer a technology platform that is ThingLogix's foundry, that really is a platform that sits top of all the underlying AWS serverless compute resources. >> So IoT's a big space. GE's in it, everybody's in it. You're a little company. >> Carl: Yeah. >> So what's interesting is, both from an entrepreneurial point of view, as well as just, you know, punching above your weight, how does working kind of in the AWS eco system, both as for your own infrastructure, but also as for go to market and partnership, enable you guys to really do punch above your weight. >> You know, it's a big challenge when you start getting into a partner eco system, like AWS. The thing that sets us apart, really, is that we are very much a pure play, serverless, computing company. From the ground up, we built our own infrastructure that way, we built our own platform that way, and it allows us to be a lot more agile and creative with our customers. It allows us to move much faster and more cost effectively than a lot of other system integrators. >> Right, and you said before we turned on the cameras, that too, it also though, gives you these partnership opportunities with less pure plays. >> Carl: Correct. >> To insert you into potentially a bigger project for that piece that you guys can deliver better than anybody else. That's a pretty unique opportunity. >> Right, yeah. So us partnering with some of the bigger systems integrators is pretty standard practice for us because we can come in and we can work with the the business on really prototyping and innovating quickly. Get us, getting the rapid application development side of things done, and then transition that over to the more managed services oriented firms to take on board. >> Right. And can you imagine trying to do what you're doing without a big infrastructure provider, a big marketplace partner? >> No, it would be nearly impossible. Just to, IoT is fast-moving technology trend. It's been around for a while, in the M to M space. Typically, it's been controlled by the engineering side of house. What we're seeing now is that it's migrating more over to the product management and marketing folks. So they're expecting the same agility that you get with platforms like Salesforce, platforms like Workday. They want that same thing in their product development lifecycle. We've been able to help customers take projects from concept and prototype, through to actually in stores, in the market in about nine to nine weeks, nine to twelve weeks. >> Jeff: Wow. >> So I was just thinking, as you guys were chatting about what the consulting services are like. Give us an example of a typical customer, and you kind of just did, where they, are you talking to retailers that have IoT products to sell, you mentioned, kind of more of a bind center, maybe within products and marketing. So I was just wondering kind of, what is that typical customer like, and what sort of questions have they come to you with? Is it more of an idea that we need to get to market, or is it more of a, we have all of these devices at the edge that we sort of need to-- >> It's a combination, right? We deal a lot with consumer product companies that are trying to enable or connect an existing product or an existing line of products. And they're doing so, not for the engineering purposes, but more to get a better customer experience, and a more timely customer experience, right? Being able to connect with their customers in new and different ways. We're also seeing quite a bit of migration from legacy systems like Exeda or In-House Solutions to the AWS cloud. Really this idea of cloud first architecture, has taken root in the enterprise. And it's been happening over the last 10 years, and I think it's really starting to pay off because companies are looking for a reason not to go to the cloud, versus a reason to go to the cloud. And IoT with the AWS platform and serverless compute resources, really, it takes away all those reasons why you wouldn't. >> [Convention Intercom] Ladies and Gentlemen, don't forget to stop-- >> Lisa: Oops, we'll pause for a-- >> The big voice from above, right. >> Pause for an announcement. >> [Convention Intercom] Get a t-shirt. >> Get a t-shirt. >> Oh, a t-shirt. >> Get a t-shirt. >> I don't want to miss out on that. So just wanted to ask you, give us some ideas of how customers are using the services. I was looking at your webpage, I'll open it back up, and as a pool owner, I though, oh, pool energy. I think I need that. Give us an idea of a company like that. Was this an idea that has really been enabled by what you provide? >> Sure, we've seen companies really try to evolve some of the products, some of their commodity products into more of a smart service, right? When AWS IoT launched, we led with a company called Sealed Air. And they were actually investigating, they make commodity chemicals and cleaning equipment, and things like that. And they were looking for new and different ways to really add value to their products. So we came out, helped them prototype and come out with a connected hand soap dispenser, which seemed kind of silly at the time, but when you start looking at the secondary uses of the data, it allowed them to really start to hone in on hand sanitation compliance, and really kind of start to wrap a reduction of foodborne illness around this one connected device. And as we started to extend that, we started to get into auto-replenishment, we started to get into consumption billing, so they can actually, companies can now take a piece of equipment, put it out to a customer with less capital investment, and charge per hour of use, or per thing that happens on that machine, right? So we're seeing a lot of evolution of business models. People trying to do different things. And it comes down usually to make money or save money, right? >> Jeff: Right, right. >> Companies that want to make money are going down a path of really that enhanced customer experience, companies that want to save money are really looking for efficiencies in field service and warranty claims, and in waste reduction. >> Right. I'm curious though, on kind of the secondary value of the data. >> Carl: Right. >> Was that something they kind of thought about ahead of time, that maybe we'll be able to get? >> Carl: No, no. >> Or was it something that kind of came along. Because clearly, auto-replenishment, right, that's a easy, and billing by consumption, that's not brain surgery. But it's the secondary stuff that really becomes the essence of digitizing your business. >> Carl: Right. >> And I think the hand sanitizer's a really interesting example, because who would ever think there's a digital play beyond the obvious in hand sanitizer. >> Right, right. And what it allows them to do is focus in on behaviors of people that you could never measure otherwise. It would be very difficult to sit in the deli all day long and watch whether or not every employee washes their hands a correct amount of time, but we can really easily take a look across an entire supermarket chain and pick out who the outliers are, and then focus the efforts on training those individuals, and really enhancing the compliance of that. >> So does it pick up their ID tag when they're in proximity to the hand sanitizer? >> Carl: Well, see there are a lot of privacy concerns. >> Right, right. >> The use would be more, take a look at the aggregate of the data and just say, "That one is completely out of norm from the others. >> Jeff: Right, right. That's great, though. >> That's amazing, you again, wouldn't really think of that, but to your point, that does really kind of underscore just one of the important elements that businesses need to consider when digitizing. It's new business opportunities, new revenue streams, cost optimization, and that is a really, kind of a, I don't know, maybe it's not a unique example, the hand sanitizer example, of the other elements in which that business was able to get into by having this secondary look, or maybe a completely different look at the data. >> Yeah, and it's, as IoT really starts to serve those other masters besides the engineering and R and D folks, the marketing people are asking completely different questions than the technology people have been asking, which is why we're being pressured to move so quickly, beause as the creativity starts to enter in to this technology trend, they're expecting results immediately versus having to wait nine months, and spend millions of dollars-- >> It was interesting, in Andy's fireside chat, Buzzword Bingo, he said the buzzword that's delivering on its promise the fastest, in his opinion, was IoT. I was totally caught by surprise. Of all the different things, I would never have guessed that he would pick IoT, but you're right at the leading edge of this stuff, and it's moving faster than probably people probably give it credit for. >> The tough part about IoT is it's so huge, right? >> Jeff: Right. >> There's so many different flavors of it. GE has the industrial IoT that they're chasing after, the consumer products tends to be, right now, it's a trend. They connect everything from toothbrushes to whatever. But the idea being that having this connected product, can either enable new customer experiences, drive new business models, or help drive efficiencies in an organization, is really the fulfillment of that promise. >> Jeff: All right. >> From the culture perspect, I'm just curious, you're small right now, one of the things, too, that Andy talked about that I thought was interesting, was he was starting to talk about the culture of AWS. One of the things that they've been very vocal about is, they're very customer centric. They rarely talk about competition. How is that being a partner and being in the marketplace, with one of the announcements today, that's making it even simpler. Do you feel that, as a partner with them, that being in this marketplace, does their culture kind of permeate through that and help you open doors, like we talked about a minute ago, with other partners? >> Oh, they're fantastic. It's a great partner program just because they're super collaborative with even small partners like us. We had, maybe a little bit different experience coming into Amazon, because we ame with a little bit of knowledge of what they were already dealing with, but they've been really responsive and helpful, and it's, being in the marketplace is going to change the game for us because it offloads a lot of the things that we don't want to do, as we make the move more toward providing a platform as a service. They will take over the billing, and the distribution, and the management of, and customer, more so, than a small company like us would be able to do. So I think it enables a small company to get a greater reach than it would for normal, normally distributed. >> Excellent. Well, Carl, thank you so much for joining us-- >> Carl: Thank you. On theCUBE today, and sharing with our audience, a little bit about ThingLogix. We wish you continued success. >> Thank you. >> In connecting more and more devices globally. >> Carl: Thank you. >> For my co-host, Jeff Frick, I'm Lisa Martin. You've been watching us live on theCUBE, at AWS Summit, San Francisco. Stick around, we'll be right back. (techno music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Amazon Web Services. We are live in San Francisco at the AWS Summit. and deploy, and bring to market, IoT solutions How long have you been, and tell us a little bit and became the AWS IoT platform. to do with IoT and accelerate their adoption of IoT inside and our advisory services group that works So IoT's a big space. but also as for go to market and partnership, From the ground up, we built our own infrastructure Right, and you said before we turned on the cameras, for that piece that you guys can deliver better So us partnering with some of the bigger systems integrators And can you imagine trying to do what you're doing in stores, in the market in about nine to nine weeks, Is it more of an idea that we need to get to market, and I think it's really starting to pay off by what you provide? of the data, it allowed them to really start and in waste reduction. of the data. But it's the secondary stuff that really beyond the obvious in hand sanitizer. and really enhancing the compliance of that. of the data and just say, "That one is completely Jeff: Right, right. that businesses need to consider when digitizing. Of all the different things, I would never have guessed the consumer products tends to be, How is that being a partner and being in the marketplace, and it's, being in the marketplace is going to change the game Well, Carl, thank you so much for joining us-- We wish you continued success. Stick around, we'll be right back.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mona | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Keith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kevin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Joel Minick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ryan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cathy Dally | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Patrick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Greg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stephen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kevin Miller | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Marcus | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Alante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Greg Tinker | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Utah | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Raleigh | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Brooklyn | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Carl Krupitzer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lenovo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
JetBlue | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Angie Embree | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kirk Skaugen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Simon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
United | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Southwest | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kirk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Patrick Osborne | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1984 | DATE | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Carl Eschenbach, VMware | VMworld 2015
no from the noise it's the cube covering vmworld 2015 brought to you by VMware and its ecosystem sponsors now your hosts John furrier and Dave vellante okay welcome back everyone we are live in San Francisco moscone north lobby at vmworld 2015 this is the cube silicon angles flagship program we go out to the events and extract the scene from the noise i'm john furrier the founder still gonna enjoy my coach dave vellante co-founder Wikibon calm research our next call our next guest is called shabaab the president and c-e-o chief opera offer vmware welcome back to the queue great to see you John Dave thanks for having me it's always good to spend time with you every vmworld we sit here it's great to have you but this year a little change of plans you did the opening keynote so were you nervous I mean usually it's girl singer it's the big stage and yeah you're the top note your peeps come on yeah i mean i don't i don't necessarily get that nervous anymore i mean if you don't have a little bit about it flies in your belly then you're not excited about doing it so it's more the nervousness about get going getting out there i mean when you first walk out and you see 20,000 sets of people looking at yeah you're like okay game on let's get going I'd like to set up this year like how you set the table up for Pat today's big great presentation but you laid out i'll c vm foundation you got vm women's thing going on today at four o'clock at them at the marriott you have a lot of product announcements kind of the blocking and tackling of the success so share with us some of the highlights because everyone's like who are whores the old school at what's not what nothing really new here and then the new folks to be in world like refresh wow a lot of new stuff here so yeah so i think it's a new stuff you know being a you know an old veteran here at vmware of more than 13 years i think it's just so exciting is how the company continues to you know innovate time and time again and we use vmworld as to showcase to be able to do that you know things that stand out for me right now is how you if you look back over time there's been a whole bunch of different technologies and companies that we're going to put vmware out of business and you come to vmworld and at first it starts with coneqtec then it's hyper-v then it's zen then it's kvn then it was OpenStack now it's containers and just watching vm we're how we think about the future make sure we embrace these new technologies that move the market forward is something we're quite proud of them we don't always view all of these things as big competitive threats we look at them as market extension opportunities for us and they all run on the same platform that we've brought to market for the mass many years so I you know and then we have some great events we have we have a vm women's conference we do every year at you know showing our diversity and we're really focused on that a lot internally at the company and then there's many events i just left we have a cio conference this year that's being hosted by our by our cio bass kire that's going really well with 40 different CIOs and we just you know keep thinking of different ways to be innovative at this conference time and time again not only technologically about how we engage with our people yeah I gotta say this year I that stands out for me as well and all some illustrations for me is one Pat's keynote today really thinks a long view of perspective because that's the tam is bigger it's not about short-term results and all this Elliott capital converses are on the Federation which is noise to the bigger picture which he basically just kills that conversation when out here's look at the future this yeah we're going after and then you got tactical stuff like DevOps which is kind of down in the trenches yeah so that's interesting that's so to me that's the highlight of for me this week so I got to ask you with that going on you're out leading the teams that actually talk to customers yes so how do you now take the vision that Pat laid out and you get the Federation construct how do you do in those deals how's everything working with VMware get some give us some data on what's going on with the with the sales the customers the deployments of solutions yeah so again yeah you know we did lay out a great vision at vmworld again this year and if you look at how we're addressing the market we're really now talking to multiple audiences where if you go back five years ago we talked to a single audience and as we engage with our customers we're talking to you know if you will the core VMware virtualization folks but now we're talking to networking teams we're talking to security we're talking to the line of business who is driving IT and we're also engaging as you said John with the developer community and one of the things that we've been focused on is not only going after those audiences but may making sure the core IT is become relevant to these next generation type of people that want to leverage our infrastructure and you know with our vision we now can turn over our vision to our core customers and say you now can internally market yourself as someone who's capable of running your legacy environment and looking at the future as well and I think that's really playing out here in the show this year and then the other area is just with nsx nsx and we showed the picture of a bullet train with it with you know this thing taking off and going extremely fast yesterday at the financial analyst meeting we had and i can tell you and just watching i just walked through the show floor over there and you go to the vmware booth in the one section that is jam-packed every time you go there is around nsx so John I'd say these customer engagements and conversations have expanded from pure virtualization to the cloud people to security and a lot of that as around NSX and then in one lasting dave is it's just our end user computing strategy I think at the conference last year we said what a difference a year makes an end-user computing in 2014 in 2015 I'll say it again what a difference a year makes we've come so far the acquisition of AirWatch has put us on the forefront of everything going on and both not virtualizing existing desktops but the world of mobility so our strategies coming together and i will tell you you talk to customers at the show they're seeing it real time well what a difference five years makes especially in that business if it's a win a 180 in that hole and use a computer space so you're talking about these different opportunities and it ties into the TAM expansion that you guys lay it out a couple years ago actually your strategic plan the reason i like talking yukos because you you're the executive who's most responsible for running the business i listen to the conference calls when I can or i read the transcripts and you know paddle give the high-level jonatha will give you the tax rates and then it comes out of carl won't you take that because you know that the business you're the executive who really isn't responsible for that and the big theme of these last you know several calls has been you know years now a couple years diversifying beyond the beyond the core of vSphere and you you're beginning to do that in a big way v san NSX vCloud air management so I wonder if you could talk about that Tam expansion and the business and how you feel about that in the momentum yeah I think one of the statistics we share on the hearings call every quarter is how our business has evolved over the years in the statistic we always use is what percentage of our business comes outside a stand alone if you will naked vSphere sales and now we're up over sixty percent of our business you know up from I think just three years ago or was only thirty percent of our business so we continue to evolve and make sure we're selling all these products the exciting part is we have all these solutions Dave at the same time when when you're thinking about from a go-to-market perspective we have to really figure out where to prioritize and how we enable our sales force to be capable of now catching all these great solutions and products we have to take to market so we've spent a lot of time on evolving and transforming our sales force to be capable of selling multiple solutions into the market but it goes way beyond Dave quite frankly our sales force it also goes to our channel as you know it just walked out solutions exchange over there you see you know 400 plus you know customers partners and ecosystem folks there they're all working with us and we have to make sure that they can move with us as quickly as we want to move as we bring these things to Marcus so it's um it's not easy I think we're doing quite well in the evolution of our go-to-market in how we're selling but it's something we're going to have to keep working on especially as you go into cloud and you have different licensing models whether it's a perpetual a subscription model or term model there's a whole bunch of things we have to do different and I think we're doing it well and the customers want that that choice but I'm glad you brought up that point because it's a great opportunity for you especially as your enterprise agreements come up for renewal now you can sell other services like bananas and bunches but it's complicated and and what I'm hearing from you is it's really the ecosystem power that allows you to do that yeah and and as well some hard work and training and the like yeah absolutely Dave in yo we do have you know use the enterprise license agreement as a vehicle and how we engage with our customers and as they come up for renewal the great news is we have a framework in place and now we have the opportunity as we continue to innovate bring more more are these products into the renewal and hopefully make them bigger as the years go on so Carl Pat said in this keynote sound but I picked up on referencing clouds can we all can't we all get along kind of like playing with that kind of phrase everyone kind of throws around so I want you to comment on that and then I want to share tweet with you then I'm going to ask you a sales motion question with how you guys are handling your sales motions with your customers in terms of the value proposition someone tweeted it's no longer the big beating the small it's the fast beating the slow get agile with VMware one cloud so one cloud any device are any on cloud and any device yeah is the key message so let's start with the cloud question first can't we all get along I think in some sense we can and we are getting along in another sense we're competing I mean this is a cooperative world we live in or I call it frenemies we're friends and enemies simultaneously it's just the world we live in an IT today and if you look at it through the lens of VMware the one thing we've said time and time again is we're going to give our customers freedom flexibility and choice I articulated this during my keynote yesterday morning and and really it's this whole notion of letting our customers choose who they partner with how they partner with them and then look to VMware and say will you still engage and we're doing that an example in the cloud space VMware obviously can run on premise with our private cloud and we can run our customers workloads in our vCloud air cloud itself or one of our partners but at the same time we'll look at our customers and say you know what if you want a provision any of your workloads and run them in an amazon cloud in a microsoft azure cloud or any other cloud out there will be the provisioning letter through what we call cmp cloud management platform and that's what helped us emerge to be the number one cloud management platform player in the industry so it's not necessarily we have to directly engage with with some of our competitors in a cloud space but we also look at our customers say hey they have great clouds we're not going to have one big homo genius cloud there's going to be many college there's going to be a heterogeneous set of infrastructure people want to use and we're going to allow them to do that but we're going to be the orchestrator of just a drill down on that the word engineering came up in Pat's cube conversation earlier today talking about cloud how cloud be many things to many people hybrid cloud is just a kind of like this should be the computing it's the outcome of engineering efforts and every customer is a different use case get workloads exactly so given that piece there that is where the resource piece comes up the unlimited resource so is that the key driver for your philosophy of in many clouds that hey let the customers engineer what they want per se is that kind of what you're getting at what we're saying is we know the customers who want to leverage many clouds out there I mean whether and it's not just infrastructure-as-a-service clouds its past clouds platform as a service and it says whether it's sales force or box or you know any of the others and we're saying we know they're going to want to use them at the same time we look at our customers and say listen we've been on a journey you know and we say we've been on a journey for the last 10 years together and there's probably no one who's provided more value right or more economic return in the data center than VMware in the last 10 years it's a rhetorical question and I'll ask customers that and they'll say yeah you're probably right and then I say it's not if it's when you're going to use a public cloud and they'll say yes and then I'll say well why don't we go on another decade long journey and make sure that exactly how you run your environment today we give you a safe passage way to go to the cloud not if but when you want to go there with the same operating model with the same tooling in the same infrastructure and when you have that conversation with VMware customers are like let's engage and let's go on another journey because I know why you can take me there and that's where our engineering comes in things like long distance vmotion backing up virtual machines in a public cloud so the engineering of what we're doing is deeply integrated into our solutions but it doesn't eliminate our customers from using other classes wiki there if I may is that you're enabling your idea giving credibility to the IT organizations that are subtitle those are your peeps right so it's the shadow IT that those guys are trying to avoid and obviously that's the edict of the organization that I t is responsible for so that to me is the key yeah I'm it's a great way to put I mean the thing that's happening now is is that what Pat brought up I want to get your conscious because this comes back your sales touch points out so you have your constituent in IT jobs so Pat said on the cube here he said they did a survey and the DevOps DevOps conference whether you're a developer or in ninety and majority the people were in IT mm-hmm so after you own that's your wheelhouse you have a great install base 10-year journey that's cool you own that so John you call it ops dev but this is nice i see i do the guys who kicked ass with virtualization so we know that exists out there but what's happening now that we're seeing here and i want to see if you guys are seeing it in the field is there's a whole nother pressure point from the app developers yeah that are rolling out massive projects are you guys touching that part of the organization the sales motion are you hearing that from customers thank you know I think the question really is how are we engaging or what are we doing to engage with probably a different set of customers and that's the developers and I would say if you talk to Robin and you talk to the marketing teams we're just reaching out to those developers we haven't historically as you both said really been talking to developers we supplied IT with an infrastructure that then they support the developer community but what you're seeing now is the developers don't believe I can give them what they want and they're going around them to other denture any cloud boat which is exactly why now VMware has a two-prong strategy we're going to go and what we're going to do is we're going to enable IT to remain the platform of choice for the developers but we're also going to go and touch the developers and give them the confidence that they can run on the existing unlimited shadow I teach that is the goal it will always exist I'm sure but for some things but you know it's been our shadow IT is always doing the cubes like it's been are indeed it's like at some point you got to operationalize it absolutely and you know if you think about it when we speak to customers what we want them to be as a service broker we want them to broker infrastructure services past services SAS service and developer services on the most efficient effective way they can run it whether its internal or external clouds and in and we don't want to create a bottleneck because you never want to slow down the speed of innovation from the developer community but if you can somehow funnel and through IT and they can get the confidence I t can get them the resources they want then it's a win-win shadow i t's born out of necessity if you can eliminate the necessity exactly wit everybody wins a crate so final question for me is what are the top conversations that you're having with customers when you know in terms of like look at just from metadata from you on like but what are some of the conversations that are there in the real down-and-dirty conversations with the customers what are they talking about what's their top concerns what's the point every probably three the first is you know the challenge they have with running their legacy data center where seventy percent of IT dollars are spent but also trying to address the needs of the business and devout developer community you know if you will supporting both sides that the divide is actually really hard and they're all struggling with it you talk to any customer of any size they're struggling with it how do you take your brownfield environment and make it capable of handling net new infrastructure of platforming solutions and applications and some of them just build brand new green field data centers and that's how they go forward so that's the first thing that we hear loud and clear from our customers the second is I don't think you know any of them believe the technology is not going to evolve and when we bring this whole notion it's a very big vision of software-defined data center to our customers they all get it and I'm confident we can deliver all the way from Network compute to storage and highly automated that is not their biggest challenge the single biggest challenge we see with our customers to getting massive scale adoption of the software-defined data center it's not technology its people their organizations are aligned on the network team on the compute team on the storage team on the dev ops team and all sudden this crappy company VMware comes in and says we're converging to technologies and now you have a mismatch between your technology organisation so sake for your transformation that people Jennifer mation is actually really hard for them to consume right so it's you know that I'd say that is the single biggest challenge that we see with our customers I'll tell you in our experience the successful organizations are the ones that damn the torpedoes bring in the technology and then figure it out as opposed to trying to figure out the organization because it'll never happen yes Oh work experience is there it's a forcing function exactly and then the third area conversation we're having with our customers you know he's around network virtualization this is you know not it's when and how fast i think we've eliminated the barrier of virtualizing the infrastructure just like we did years ago with you know ESX it took a long time for us to break through that barrier but because we broke through that barrier i think the there's a much more openness to something like that or virtualization because we've already proved it can be done in one component of the data center compute why can't we do it on networking so that's a that's a big discussion point yeah for the folks watching that last point if you look at Pat Gelson's interview he talks about where that hardon line is he sees the evolution so yeah Carl thanks for the insight I know you're super busy you got a lot of things to do your roaming the halls going to all the different events congratulations and thanks for coming on the Cuban sharing your insights thanks for having me appreciate being here every year with you guys great stuff from vmworld 2015 is the cube I'm John furrier with Dave allante live in San Francisco for the Emerald 2015 we'll be right back after this short break
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Robin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Pat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
john furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday morning | DATE | 0.99+ |
180 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ninety | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
vmworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Carl Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
more than 13 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
vmware | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
over sixty percent | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
40 different CIOs | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Dave allante | PERSON | 0.98+ |
three years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two-prong | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
thirty percent | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
nsx | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
coneqtec | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
vmworld 2015 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Marcus | PERSON | 0.94+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
ESX | TITLE | 0.94+ |
400 plus | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
AirWatch | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.93+ |
Emerald | EVENT | 0.93+ |
Wikibon | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
one section | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
third area | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
couple years ago | DATE | 0.9+ |
John furrier | PERSON | 0.89+ |
four o'clock | DATE | 0.89+ |
DevOps | TITLE | 0.88+ |
shabaab | PERSON | 0.87+ |
single biggest challenge | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
San Francisco moscone | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
last 10 years | DATE | 0.85+ |
20,000 sets of people | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
single audience | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
10-year | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
Carl Eschenbach | VMworld 2014
live from San Francisco California it's the queue at vmworld 2014 brought to you by vmware cisco EMC HP and nutanix now here are your hosts John courier and Dave vellante okay welcome back in when we are live in san francisco california at vmworld 2014 is the cube I'm John furry with Dave a lot day our next guest is ecology about the president and chief operating officer VMware welcome back to the queue great to see you thanks for having me again Dave appreciate it looking good the question I want to get get to you right away as vmworld gets bigger and bigger and bigger every year and your job gets bigger and bigger and bigger every year so give us the update on what's going on at the top of VMware obviously operationalizing cloud and with air watch end-user computing I'll see several engine data center you're still on your mission what's the big change or impact to your business yeah so at the top of VMware we've recently announced some realignment of our executive staff and it started with myself patent Jonathan or CFO sitting down and having a conversation and how can we scale our company to be 10 billion dollars from six billion where we're at today so we looked at all of different operational aspects we looked at our go-to-market aspects we looked at the strategy and how we run our M&A business and we decided to break things up and I've now got responsibilities continue to have responsibility for the go-to-market aspects our partner ecosystem and i also have responsibility obviously for marketing's of these events in robin matlock our chief marketing officer and i also recently picked up the responsibility to support our strategy efforts as well as our ma efforts so all of that at the same time and I've given up a few of the operational you know responsibilities I've had and given in the Jonathan's and now Jonathan can really look at the back office and make sure we're built to scale operationally and this is freed pad up than to really focus his efforts and I'm on each of the strategic initiatives we have around the software-defined data center the hybrid cloud and our end user computing components and and it really worked out well the structures work and you know we have a great executive team that really like to work together yeah you got so you got guy running the trains on time in the back office you're watching the chess board has stringing the products together trying to build out the division exactly yeah exactly so I got I got to ask you about just in general the the overall plan with MA for instance obviously AirWatch very successful position pat was kind of glowing about it didn't give specifics certain a lot to do growing market a lot of white space is a lot of new things like docker obviously evo rails and I'll see an end user side before before we get the kind of that vision talk about air watch how is that done can you be specific about some metrics yeah so you know we're very excited about the air watch acquisition obviously it took place earlier this year and you know we've achieved everything we expected to achieve out of that acquisition it's really you know hit its mark based on the business hand when we built as we went into the acquisition and what I'm really excited about now is you know how do we get leverage how do we get economies of scale on leverage ally existing VMware footprint that we have on a global basis to really help bear watch expand deeper into our large accounts and faster internationally so as you could imagine VMware having a large international footprint AirWatch did not we're leveraging our international footprint to get air watch deep into parts of Europe and Asia and Pacific where they haven't been in the past and then the last area leverage we're really excited about is you know it was just last month when we put the air watch product on our price list that now gives not only VMware core sales folks the ability to sell it into the market but also our channel so now our channel has the ability to sell if you will you know all of the air watch products into the market and not just do it themselves in their channels so there's a lot of leverage we're going to get so go to market seems exciting a lot of action going on talk about the name change is obviously there's been some that we've got a decoder ring blog posts were putting together around okay you got you got the air name vCloud air a lot of stuff changing on kind of the nomenclature of some of the what's the rationale behind that was there a method to the madness was it just kind of like just trying to align everything not just water vapor anymore yeah exactly no yeah so we actually have a you know under Robin that like our CMO we have a team that focus on naming and branding and when we looked at all the components we have we actually were getting a little bit disconnect is connected and how we take to market our products their brands in their names so we've decided to streamline everything everything always mark starts with a small D so now we have vCloud air right for you know our hybrid cloud we have V realize which is now our suite of management automation and provisioning tools and operation tools so we just thought it was the right time to do it we had this great event called vmworld to take our new brand and naming conventions into the market and you know everyone seems to be responding quite well to it everyone recognized V something around VMware and we're just trying to streamline that across everything we do so there's some some consistency in our naming because they're not going to call this the VQ I'm actually I'm very open to doing that to hit you are a TM world and if you want to change the name we can make that announcement right now my stag Dave and I will sell right you're running out that I'm just asking I don't run M&A now so you guys pretty much I think nailed the docker positioning obviously this this conference I mean announced a big partnership OpenStack you know there was a lot of buzz about that before these disruptive technologies seem to have a good playbook for saying okay how are we going to address these how are we going to embrace them and how does I was going to help us attack art am so we started to pool the other day though I got to ask you this so who gets to 10 billion first AWS or or VMware so you mentioned how do you get to 10 billion now Behrendt yesterday at the analyst meeting I thought asked a very good question he brought up he basically said this conventional wisdom out here that Amazon is going to rule the world he said I don't I don't agree that said there's at least one other guy that doesn't agree you obviously didn't agree so I want to talk about that it's the one piece that is still hard to understand because you got you know guys like Andy Jassy I'm one end of the world saying okay this is what the world is going to look like and you guys like yourself and pat and joe tucci say no no this is what the world is going to look like and certainly you talk to customers are they are you guys both right you both is one wrong is one right what's your take on it well I obviously can't comment on whether they're right or wrong but I can give you our views and pay nobody really sad right we'll find out in a few years I you know during during the keynote yesterday I thought bill fathers had a great slide to talked about the amount of workloads that are on premise versus the amount of workloads that are off premise in the public cloud and still to this day less than ten percent of the workloads are in the public cloud and even if you look out many years from now there will still be you know less than twenty percent of the workloads in a public cloud so the opportunity still exists in private clouds and on-premise but what we need to do is we need to make sure that we're not locking any customer into a or strategy is it on premise or off premise is a hybrid cloud or as a public cloud or is it only public cloud and hybrid cut it has to be in an strategy that's why we tried to articulate the power of and and that's how we think we're differentiating ourselves in the market so we don't think about it as we're competing against the public cloud providers because we have a differentiated platform we're bringing this hybrid solution to market to what we call hybridity that allows our customers to move workloads you know inside out and outside in and when we pull all that together I think the winner will be the people who can truly deliver a hybrid cloud infrastructure and allow companies to seamlessly and securely federated workloads and move them on premise and off-premise and that's our focus so I like that strategy I mean basically you're saying we're focused on the customers you got about half a million customers now we have half a million customers and fifty million virtual machines under metal the strategies of you if you service those guys you're gonna you're going to do well and I and I buy that at the same time Carl in a way I feel like well you may not be competing with the public cloud AKA amazon your customers in a way are and what i mean by that is there's pressure from the corner office yeah now you have to be their advocate and help drive those costs down you've cited I think yesterday you started but look when it comes to security reliability availability that's where we're going to win that's our spot so my specific question is what do you make for example of the CIA deal a company like Amazon was able to take on a company like IBM and knock them out is that a unique corner case or I wonder if you could give a perspective on that no I think I think as we go forward we're going to see more and more if you all vertical clouds start to emerge you can think of the CIA transaction with AWS as a vertical cloud specifically to serve the CIA you know department and I think you'll see more and more of them emerge in the future and it's a very competitive world that we live in right i mean everyone bid on that except for vmware because we didn't necessarily have our product in the market for the federal government we didn't have our certification to service the federal market but now we will have in the very near future all assertive certifications we need to build a vertical cloud and go and support you know department of defense agencies so i think in the future it's going to be a competitive battleground everyone's going to buy for it but at the same time you know i think you know people can over rotate and say hey they won that and that means they're going to dominate this market this market is still very immature it's growing the majority of the workloads are on premise and I still go back to the fundamentals of the hybrid approach that you talked about to securely and seamlessly move workloads I think you know we're well positioned and but time will tell right and well the average age of an enterprise app I think it's uh almost 20 years one of years those actors gonna disappear overnight yeah no they will not disappear and again just remember that slide from bill father's presentation yesterday I remember it's a lot of DNA from BM worldstar 50 year 2010 when calm originals to CEO he laid out the vision and it's happening maybe Linda different for how you get there pivotal now out separate company yeah I got to ask you the Pat Gelsinger question I get in some comments here and LinkedIn people from my friend John bare ass CMO mint ago who worked at padded Intel people tend to forget Pat led the Intel team that designed for 86 he knows his stuff technically pad certainly as a technical person so Pat's got some time freed up you're doing the MA is Pat yesterday is you guys playing defense or offense of course was packing say offense you know he's an offensive player so did you really think he was gonna say detail I didn't I was actually saying he's an offensive nobody came up in the cube earlier somebody said oh thank you but I said no how had a player that's he doesn't play defense been knowing bad so I'd ask you the same question what is the offense for your plays in strategy go to market for VMware what hills are you going to take down first given your base position you had a lot of clients you're adding value certainly that's cool but as you go out and compete and win what's your offensive strategies so listen the thing we do every year at vmworld as we come out and we go on the offensive right we're a very disruptive you know technology innovative lead company in a very positive way disruption can be viewed negatively but I think we're a very disruptive company in a positive way and what we did this year is we absolutely went on the offensive we looked at the market dynamics we looked at the shift in how people might want to consume technology in the future whether it's open source OpenStack or this whole emergence of the containers that are happening so if you just stop and look at where each of those are at OpenStack is still very immature you're not going to find a lot of people have built big implementations of OpenStack successfully containers right has just emerged in the last if you will six months we're actually recognizing that as a potential market you know movement and we're embracing it so this is an opportunity for VMware to say we're not trying to defend our strategy we're not trying to defend our turf we see containers we see OpenStack as a market expansion opportunity for us and I think one of the things people tend to forget if you go back a decade ago there was many different value propositions around just server virtualization but one of the key ones was it allowed us to break down the silos that existed in data centers for many decades and with virtualization we brought to market a platform that allow people to get easy access to infrastructure in the same form factor so it was a platform play now think about that we broke down the silos a decade ago if we go back in as an industry we start to deploy VMware which most customers have today then all of a sudden now I need to OpenStack environment and let's now think about a container strategy and deploy something like Dockers and you do all on different physical infrastructures you've built a lot more silos and it only makes it that much more complex for our customers and our partners this is why we're now taking to market in a very offensive offensive approach to say support VMware but if you want to run these other things please do so but we believe are the best platform for service delivery that gives consistency and lowers both effects and capex for our customers yeah and you said the consumption is key and this cloud consumption models changing the game on how customers can soon technologies so you're saying hey we want to protect our vmware base but we're going to give them a choice exactly right fictional flexibility a choice is one of our key tenets of our strategy and as our company if you will values so I want to talk about caught I mean it's kind of boring in mundane but when you talk to we have a CIO of San Mateo County coming on one of your customers shortly and there's always a focus on cost when you talk about infrastructure vmware's got a very tough act to follow in it then it's because it it created such a huge cost savings by you know taking all the waste out of much of the waste out of servers so where does that next sort of wave come from there's certainly a lot of innovation going on we're seeing that is it things like hyper convergence what you guys announced this week can you keep that cost curve go is it volume with your you know 4,000 partners I wonder if you could talk about that a little because I'm sure your customers are beating up all the time how do we keep costs going what have you done for me lately Carl yeah absolutely it's a great question so it to your point you know over the last decade we brought our customers a massive amount of capex savings you know you take a hundred widget you consolidate that the tenders an immediate ROI there but you have to remember where you are now not just a computer chua zation company we're a data center automation company and we're taking the core tenants of the cat back savings that we brought many of our customers over the last decade and we're moving from compute and we're doing the same on networking and we're doing the same on storage so if you look at it networking alone right by implementing a technology like NSX as an abstraction in an overlay networking platform you don't need to rip and replace your hardware infrastructures to get network virtualization if you think about our customers who have a whole bunch of servers out there today and a lot of those servers have local did saan them most of them are never being used in VMware environment you're using you know an ass or a SAN storage array around VMware now you implement something like this and you can take advantage of all that unused excess capacity that people already have in the data center that is just three examples of capex savings we're bringing our customers so it's not just that we did it in compute I fundamentally believe we have the opportunity to do the same across the rest of the physical state of the data center now on top of that by implementing you know management automation orchestration and remediation proactive remediation tools across the software-defined data center we know there is massive capex savings and affects a great labor cost acting there you know we can take a server administrator who used to support you know a hundred physical servers now can support 500 virtual machines the optic savings around that is just incredible is the business case greater in your opinion I think with the software-defined data center the business case is even greater going forward because again we're doing it on the server but now network can compute and is the automation tools really start to take shape and form to manage the software-defined data center I think you even drive more value and you know even going back a decade ago everyone thought our play was really catback savings but if you talk to most of our customers why they got massive capex savings even in the early days the amount of affects a savings they got because of how we've implemented our technology and architecture in our data center was even greater than the capex savings so I think when you pull it all together this is a bias statement so i'm going to say i'm biased up front so you can't call me biased but i don't think there's a technology in the last decade or in the next decade that has driven more value both business value as well as Capital savings in the data center than VMware we're out to duty independent I would say the same thing another way Carl I mean it connect the dots there on the effects piece and also you guys do something to find data center hybrid cloud and and use a computer if those things all come home and and and and it happened the way you want you move to your next fail point so I got to bring up the globalization conversation if cloud goes down this path the consumption model will be I want by pay by the drink all surfaces and mobile becomes a huge deal so because globalization outside North America you have different issues data center clouds and I real sovereignty also so what's your take on that you guys have a huge base what's your globalization view in that piece if things start to start to materialize really aggressively you build on your base cloud comes home clouds happen in consumption but is happening what's the global strategy global impact I should say yeah so let me talk about our global strategy and then global impact so first of all vmware is very global if you look at our book of business today you know greater than fifty percent of our business is out in or outside of you know the u.s. and North America right so we're already doing very well internationally and how we go to market and how we're generating revenue across the company what you're talking about as the world becomes more and more global in the context of cloud computing how do we play into that so what we've done is we've taken our vCloud air platform and we said where are the biggest markets in the world for cloud computing it's the u.s. right it's the UK right it's Australia it's Japan it's China and if you look at what we've done is we've built out our own data centers we're addressing probably greater than ninety five percent of the infrastructure as a service market in the world with our vCloud air platform where we're not we allow our partners to do that those 3900 partners that we showcase yesterday on stage cover almost a hundred percent of the cloud opportunity so we're not going to do it ourselves we're not going to be in every country around the world but our 3900 partners are in over a hundred countries and we're servicing the cloud market opportunity directly and indirectly across vCloud air in the vCloud air network getting the hook but i want to get that partner thing is just to kind of get pivot quickly for quick comment on that AUSA to partner networks are huge they care about margin expansion and serving customers what's going on with VMware how's that going for the partners yeah so I guess it depends on which type of partner were talking about but I would say in general you know our partner ecosystem is alive and well and all you need to do is take a few steps down over there and go look at the solutions exchange floor and you'll see every technology company in the world that is either integrated or wishes to integrate with VMware in one capacity or the other and it is our responsibility just like we have over the last decade to bring our ecosystem along with us to enjoy the rich opportunity we see in the mobile cloud era the boots are big the booths are packed v Emeril's rock and i'll give you the final word but the bumper sticker on the show this year as the car drives away at down out of san francisco what's it say about vmware what's going to say in the bumper sticker that's a great question what do you think i should say Pat kelson had a good one brave new IT yeah well that's our motto it's the brave new IT but I actually think what it will say is let's go do it again we've had a hell of a journey with our customers in our ecosystem over the last decade and I say let's go do it again over the next decade and disrupt this market in a very positive way and break innovation and technology to market each in every year Kaiser by president and chief I promise of VMware making moves on the offensive vmworld 2014 we'll be right back with our next guest after this break thanks
SUMMARY :
channel has the ability to sell if you
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pat kelson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Behrendt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jonathan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
3900 partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
san francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3900 partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
less than ten percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
less than twenty percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
4,000 partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
86 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
vmware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
vmworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
500 virtual machines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Mateo County | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
greater than fifty percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over a hundred countries | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
half a million customers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
last month | DATE | 0.98+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
u.s. | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
a decade ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
OpenStack | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one piece | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
greater than ninety five percent | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Pat | PERSON | 0.96+ |
this week | DATE | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
OpenStack | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
about half a million customers | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
three examples | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
M&A | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
earlier this year | DATE | 0.95+ |
vmworld 2014 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
pat | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.95+ |
VMware | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
next decade | DATE | 0.95+ |
vCloud air | TITLE | 0.94+ |
Carl Eschenbach - VMworld 2013 - theCUBE - #VMworld
Carl Eschenbach - VMworld 2013 - theCUBE - #VMworld
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.98+ |
VMworld 2013 | EVENT | 0.91+ |
#VMworld | EVENT | 0.62+ |
Analyst Predictions 2023: The Future of Data Management
(upbeat music) >> Hello, this is Dave Valente with theCUBE, and one of the most gratifying aspects of my role as a host of "theCUBE TV" is I get to cover a wide range of topics. And quite often, we're able to bring to our program a level of expertise that allows us to more deeply explore and unpack some of the topics that we cover throughout the year. And one of our favorite topics, of course, is data. Now, in 2021, after being in isolation for the better part of two years, a group of industry analysts met up at AWS re:Invent and started a collaboration to look at the trends in data and predict what some likely outcomes will be for the coming year. And it resulted in a very popular session that we had last year focused on the future of data management. And I'm very excited and pleased to tell you that the 2023 edition of that predictions episode is back, and with me are five outstanding market analyst, Sanjeev Mohan of SanjMo, Tony Baer of dbInsight, Carl Olofson from IDC, Dave Menninger from Ventana Research, and Doug Henschen, VP and Principal Analyst at Constellation Research. Now, what is it that we're calling you, guys? A data pack like the rat pack? No, no, no, no, that's not it. It's the data crowd, the data crowd, and the crowd includes some of the best minds in the data analyst community. They'll discuss how data management is evolving and what listeners should prepare for in 2023. Guys, welcome back. Great to see you. >> Good to be here. >> Thank you. >> Thanks, Dave. (Tony and Dave faintly speaks) >> All right, before we get into 2023 predictions, we thought it'd be good to do a look back at how we did in 2022 and give a transparent assessment of those predictions. So, let's get right into it. We're going to bring these up here, the predictions from 2022, they're color-coded red, yellow, and green to signify the degree of accuracy. And I'm pleased to report there's no red. Well, maybe some of you will want to debate that grading system. But as always, we want to be open, so you can decide for yourselves. So, we're going to ask each analyst to review their 2022 prediction and explain their rating and what evidence they have that led them to their conclusion. So, Sanjeev, please kick it off. Your prediction was data governance becomes key. I know that's going to knock you guys over, but elaborate, because you had more detail when you double click on that. >> Yeah, absolutely. Thank you so much, Dave, for having us on the show today. And we self-graded ourselves. I could have very easily made my prediction from last year green, but I mentioned why I left it as yellow. I totally fully believe that data governance was in a renaissance in 2022. And why do I say that? You have to look no further than AWS launching its own data catalog called DataZone. Before that, mid-year, we saw Unity Catalog from Databricks went GA. So, overall, I saw there was tremendous movement. When you see these big players launching a new data catalog, you know that they want to be in this space. And this space is highly critical to everything that I feel we will talk about in today's call. Also, if you look at established players, I spoke at Collibra's conference, data.world, work closely with Alation, Informatica, a bunch of other companies, they all added tremendous new capabilities. So, it did become key. The reason I left it as yellow is because I had made a prediction that Collibra would go IPO, and it did not. And I don't think anyone is going IPO right now. The market is really, really down, the funding in VC IPO market. But other than that, data governance had a banner year in 2022. >> Yeah. Well, thank you for that. And of course, you saw data clean rooms being announced at AWS re:Invent, so more evidence. And I like how the fact that you included in your predictions some things that were binary, so you dinged yourself there. So, good job. Okay, Tony Baer, you're up next. Data mesh hits reality check. As you see here, you've given yourself a bright green thumbs up. (Tony laughing) Okay. Let's hear why you feel that was the case. What do you mean by reality check? >> Okay. Thanks, Dave, for having us back again. This is something I just wrote and just tried to get away from, and this just a topic just won't go away. I did speak with a number of folks, early adopters and non-adopters during the year. And I did find that basically that it pretty much validated what I was expecting, which was that there was a lot more, this has now become a front burner issue. And if I had any doubt in my mind, the evidence I would point to is what was originally intended to be a throwaway post on LinkedIn, which I just quickly scribbled down the night before leaving for re:Invent. I was packing at the time, and for some reason, I was doing Google search on data mesh. And I happened to have tripped across this ridiculous article, I will not say where, because it doesn't deserve any publicity, about the eight (Dave laughing) best data mesh software companies of 2022. (Tony laughing) One of my predictions was that you'd see data mesh washing. And I just quickly just hopped on that maybe three sentences and wrote it at about a couple minutes saying this is hogwash, essentially. (laughs) And that just reun... And then, I left for re:Invent. And the next night, when I got into my Vegas hotel room, I clicked on my computer. I saw a 15,000 hits on that post, which was the most hits of any single post I put all year. And the responses were wildly pro and con. So, it pretty much validates my expectation in that data mesh really did hit a lot more scrutiny over this past year. >> Yeah, thank you for that. I remember that article. I remember rolling my eyes when I saw it, and then I recently, (Tony laughing) I talked to Walmart and they actually invoked Martin Fowler and they said that they're working through their data mesh. So, it takes a really lot of thought, and it really, as we've talked about, is really as much an organizational construct. You're not buying data mesh >> Bingo. >> to your point. Okay. Thank you, Tony. Carl Olofson, here we go. You've graded yourself a yellow in the prediction of graph databases. Take off. Please elaborate. >> Yeah, sure. So, I realized in looking at the prediction that it seemed to imply that graph databases could be a major factor in the data world in 2022, which obviously didn't become the case. It was an error on my part in that I should have said it in the right context. It's really a three to five-year time period that graph databases will really become significant, because they still need accepted methodologies that can be applied in a business context as well as proper tools in order for people to be able to use them seriously. But I stand by the idea that it is taking off, because for one thing, Neo4j, which is the leading independent graph database provider, had a very good year. And also, we're seeing interesting developments in terms of things like AWS with Neptune and with Oracle providing graph support in Oracle database this past year. Those things are, as I said, growing gradually. There are other companies like TigerGraph and so forth, that deserve watching as well. But as far as becoming mainstream, it's going to be a few years before we get all the elements together to make that happen. Like any new technology, you have to create an environment in which ordinary people without a whole ton of technical training can actually apply the technology to solve business problems. >> Yeah, thank you for that. These specialized databases, graph databases, time series databases, you see them embedded into mainstream data platforms, but there's a place for these specialized databases, I would suspect we're going to see new types of databases emerge with all this cloud sprawl that we have and maybe to the edge. >> Well, part of it is that it's not as specialized as you might think it. You can apply graphs to great many workloads and use cases. It's just that people have yet to fully explore and discover what those are. >> Yeah. >> And so, it's going to be a process. (laughs) >> All right, Dave Menninger, streaming data permeates the landscape. You gave yourself a yellow. Why? >> Well, I couldn't think of a appropriate combination of yellow and green. Maybe I should have used chartreuse, (Dave laughing) but I was probably a little hard on myself making it yellow. This is another type of specialized data processing like Carl was talking about graph databases is a stream processing, and nearly every data platform offers streaming capabilities now. Often, it's based on Kafka. If you look at Confluent, their revenues have grown at more than 50%, continue to grow at more than 50% a year. They're expected to do more than half a billion dollars in revenue this year. But the thing that hasn't happened yet, and to be honest, they didn't necessarily expect it to happen in one year, is that streaming hasn't become the default way in which we deal with data. It's still a sidecar to data at rest. And I do expect that we'll continue to see streaming become more and more mainstream. I do expect perhaps in the five-year timeframe that we will first deal with data as streaming and then at rest, but the worlds are starting to merge. And we even see some vendors bringing products to market, such as K2View, Hazelcast, and RisingWave Labs. So, in addition to all those core data platform vendors adding these capabilities, there are new vendors approaching this market as well. >> I like the tough grading system, and it's not trivial. And when you talk to practitioners doing this stuff, there's still some complications in the data pipeline. And so, but I think, you're right, it probably was a yellow plus. Doug Henschen, data lakehouses will emerge as dominant. When you talk to people about lakehouses, practitioners, they all use that term. They certainly use the term data lake, but now, they're using lakehouse more and more. What's your thoughts on here? Why the green? What's your evidence there? >> Well, I think, I was accurate. I spoke about it specifically as something that vendors would be pursuing. And we saw yet more lakehouse advocacy in 2022. Google introduced its BigLake service alongside BigQuery. Salesforce introduced Genie, which is really a lakehouse architecture. And it was a safe prediction to say vendors are going to be pursuing this in that AWS, Cloudera, Databricks, Microsoft, Oracle, SAP, Salesforce now, IBM, all advocate this idea of a single platform for all of your data. Now, the trend was also supported in 2023, in that we saw a big embrace of Apache Iceberg in 2022. That's a structured table format. It's used with these lakehouse platforms. It's open, so it ensures portability and it also ensures performance. And that's a structured table that helps with the warehouse side performance. But among those announcements, Snowflake, Google, Cloud Era, SAP, Salesforce, IBM, all embraced Iceberg. But keep in mind, again, I'm talking about this as something that vendors are pursuing as their approach. So, they're advocating end users. It's very cutting edge. I'd say the top, leading edge, 5% of of companies have really embraced the lakehouse. I think, we're now seeing the fast followers, the next 20 to 25% of firms embracing this idea and embracing a lakehouse architecture. I recall Christian Kleinerman at the big Snowflake event last summer, making the announcement about Iceberg, and he asked for a show of hands for any of you in the audience at the keynote, have you heard of Iceberg? And just a smattering of hands went up. So, the vendors are ahead of the curve. They're pushing this trend, and we're now seeing a little bit more mainstream uptake. >> Good. Doug, I was there. It was you, me, and I think, two other hands were up. That was just humorous. (Doug laughing) All right, well, so I liked the fact that we had some yellow and some green. When you think about these things, there's the prediction itself. Did it come true or not? There are the sub predictions that you guys make, and of course, the degree of difficulty. So, thank you for that open assessment. All right, let's get into the 2023 predictions. Let's bring up the predictions. Sanjeev, you're going first. You've got a prediction around unified metadata. What's the prediction, please? >> So, my prediction is that metadata space is currently a mess. It needs to get unified. There are too many use cases of metadata, which are being addressed by disparate systems. For example, data quality has become really big in the last couple of years, data observability, the whole catalog space is actually, people don't like to use the word data catalog anymore, because data catalog sounds like it's a catalog, a museum, if you may, of metadata that you go and admire. So, what I'm saying is that in 2023, we will see that metadata will become the driving force behind things like data ops, things like orchestration of tasks using metadata, not rules. Not saying that if this fails, then do this, if this succeeds, go do that. But it's like getting to the metadata level, and then making a decision as to what to orchestrate, what to automate, how to do data quality check, data observability. So, this space is starting to gel, and I see there'll be more maturation in the metadata space. Even security privacy, some of these topics, which are handled separately. And I'm just talking about data security and data privacy. I'm not talking about infrastructure security. These also need to merge into a unified metadata management piece with some knowledge graph, semantic layer on top, so you can do analytics on it. So, it's no longer something that sits on the side, it's limited in its scope. It is actually the very engine, the very glue that is going to connect data producers and consumers. >> Great. Thank you for that. Doug. Doug Henschen, any thoughts on what Sanjeev just said? Do you agree? Do you disagree? >> Well, I agree with many aspects of what he says. I think, there's a huge opportunity for consolidation and streamlining of these as aspects of governance. Last year, Sanjeev, you said something like, we'll see more people using catalogs than BI. And I have to disagree. I don't think this is a category that's headed for mainstream adoption. It's a behind the scenes activity for the wonky few, or better yet, companies want machine learning and automation to take care of these messy details. We've seen these waves of management technologies, some of the latest data observability, customer data platform, but they failed to sweep away all the earlier investments in data quality and master data management. So, yes, I hope the latest tech offers, glimmers that there's going to be a better, cleaner way of addressing these things. But to my mind, the business leaders, including the CIO, only want to spend as much time and effort and money and resources on these sorts of things to avoid getting breached, ending up in headlines, getting fired or going to jail. So, vendors bring on the ML and AI smarts and the automation of these sorts of activities. >> So, if I may say something, the reason why we have this dichotomy between data catalog and the BI vendors is because data catalogs are very soon, not going to be standalone products, in my opinion. They're going to get embedded. So, when you use a BI tool, you'll actually use the catalog to find out what is it that you want to do, whether you are looking for data or you're looking for an existing dashboard. So, the catalog becomes embedded into the BI tool. >> Hey, Dave Menninger, sometimes you have some data in your back pocket. Do you have any stats (chuckles) on this topic? >> No, I'm glad you asked, because I'm going to... Now, data catalogs are something that's interesting. Sanjeev made a statement that data catalogs are falling out of favor. I don't care what you call them. They're valuable to organizations. Our research shows that organizations that have adequate data catalog technologies are three times more likely to express satisfaction with their analytics for just the reasons that Sanjeev was talking about. You can find what you want, you know you're getting the right information, you know whether or not it's trusted. So, those are good things. So, we expect to see the capabilities, whether it's embedded or separate. We expect to see those capabilities continue to permeate the market. >> And a lot of those catalogs are driven now by machine learning and things. So, they're learning from those patterns of usage by people when people use the data. (airy laughs) >> All right. Okay. Thank you, guys. All right. Let's move on to the next one. Tony Bear, let's bring up the predictions. You got something in here about the modern data stack. We need to rethink it. Is the modern data stack getting long at the tooth? Is it not so modern anymore? >> I think, in a way, it's got almost too modern. It's gotten too, I don't know if it's being long in the tooth, but it is getting long. The modern data stack, it's traditionally been defined as basically you have the data platform, which would be the operational database and the data warehouse. And in between, you have all the tools that are necessary to essentially get that data from the operational realm or the streaming realm for that matter into basically the data warehouse, or as we might be seeing more and more, the data lakehouse. And I think, what's important here is that, or I think, we have seen a lot of progress, and this would be in the cloud, is with the SaaS services. And especially you see that in the modern data stack, which is like all these players, not just the MongoDBs or the Oracles or the Amazons have their database platforms. You see they have the Informatica's, and all the other players there in Fivetrans have their own SaaS services. And within those SaaS services, you get a certain degree of simplicity, which is it takes all the housekeeping off the shoulders of the customers. That's a good thing. The problem is that what we're getting to unfortunately is what I would call lots of islands of simplicity, which means that it leads it (Dave laughing) to the customer to have to integrate or put all that stuff together. It's a complex tool chain. And so, what we really need to think about here, we have too many pieces. And going back to the discussion of catalogs, it's like we have so many catalogs out there, which one do we use? 'Cause chances are of most organizations do not rely on a single catalog at this point. What I'm calling on all the data providers or all the SaaS service providers, is to literally get it together and essentially make this modern data stack less of a stack, make it more of a blending of an end-to-end solution. And that can come in a number of different ways. Part of it is that we're data platform providers have been adding services that are adjacent. And there's some very good examples of this. We've seen progress over the past year or so. For instance, MongoDB integrating search. It's a very common, I guess, sort of tool that basically, that the applications that are developed on MongoDB use, so MongoDB then built it into the database rather than requiring an extra elastic search or open search stack. Amazon just... AWS just did the zero-ETL, which is a first step towards simplifying the process from going from Aurora to Redshift. You've seen same thing with Google, BigQuery integrating basically streaming pipelines. And you're seeing also a lot of movement in database machine learning. So, there's some good moves in this direction. I expect to see more than this year. Part of it's from basically the SaaS platform is adding some functionality. But I also see more importantly, because you're never going to get... This is like asking your data team and your developers, herding cats to standardizing the same tool. In most organizations, that is not going to happen. So, take a look at the most popular combinations of tools and start to come up with some pre-built integrations and pre-built orchestrations, and offer some promotional pricing, maybe not quite two for, but in other words, get two products for the price of two services or for the price of one and a half. I see a lot of potential for this. And it's to me, if the class was to simplify things, this is the next logical step and I expect to see more of this here. >> Yeah, and you see in Oracle, MySQL heat wave, yet another example of eliminating that ETL. Carl Olofson, today, if you think about the data stack and the application stack, they're largely separate. Do you have any thoughts on how that's going to play out? Does that play into this prediction? What do you think? >> Well, I think, that the... I really like Tony's phrase, islands of simplification. It really says (Tony chuckles) what's going on here, which is that all these different vendors you ask about, about how these stacks work. All these different vendors have their own stack vision. And you can... One application group is going to use one, and another application group is going to use another. And some people will say, let's go to, like you go to a Informatica conference and they say, we should be the center of your universe, but you can't connect everything in your universe to Informatica, so you need to use other things. So, the challenge is how do we make those things work together? As Tony has said, and I totally agree, we're never going to get to the point where people standardize on one organizing system. So, the alternative is to have metadata that can be shared amongst those systems and protocols that allow those systems to coordinate their operations. This is standard stuff. It's not easy. But the motive for the vendors is that they can become more active critical players in the enterprise. And of course, the motive for the customer is that things will run better and more completely. So, I've been looking at this in terms of two kinds of metadata. One is the meaning metadata, which says what data can be put together. The other is the operational metadata, which says basically where did it come from? Who created it? What's its current state? What's the security level? Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. The good news is the operational stuff can actually be done automatically, whereas the meaning stuff requires some human intervention. And as we've already heard from, was it Doug, I think, people are disinclined to put a lot of definition into meaning metadata. So, that may be the harder one, but coordination is key. This problem has been with us forever, but with the addition of new data sources, with streaming data with data in different formats, the whole thing has, it's been like what a customer of mine used to say, "I understand your product can make my system run faster, but right now I just feel I'm putting my problems on roller skates. (chuckles) I don't need that to accelerate what's already not working." >> Excellent. Okay, Carl, let's stay with you. I remember in the early days of the big data movement, Hadoop movement, NoSQL was the big thing. And I remember Amr Awadallah said to us in theCUBE that SQL is the killer app for big data. So, your prediction here, if we bring that up is SQL is back. Please elaborate. >> Yeah. So, of course, some people would say, well, it never left. Actually, that's probably closer to true, but in the perception of the marketplace, there's been all this noise about alternative ways of storing, retrieving data, whether it's in key value stores or document databases and so forth. We're getting a lot of messaging that for a while had persuaded people that, oh, we're not going to do analytics in SQL anymore. We're going to use Spark for everything, except that only a handful of people know how to use Spark. Oh, well, that's a problem. Well, how about, and for ordinary conventional business analytics, Spark is like an over-engineered solution to the problem. SQL works just great. What's happened in the past couple years, and what's going to continue to happen is that SQL is insinuating itself into everything we're seeing. We're seeing all the major data lake providers offering SQL support, whether it's Databricks or... And of course, Snowflake is loving this, because that is what they do, and their success is certainly points to the success of SQL, even MongoDB. And we were all, I think, at the MongoDB conference where on one day, we hear SQL is dead. They're not teaching SQL in schools anymore, and this kind of thing. And then, a couple days later at the same conference, they announced we're adding a new analytic capability-based on SQL. But didn't you just say SQL is dead? So, the reality is that SQL is better understood than most other methods of certainly of retrieving and finding data in a data collection, no matter whether it happens to be relational or non-relational. And even in systems that are very non-relational, such as graph and document databases, their query languages are being built or extended to resemble SQL, because SQL is something people understand. >> Now, you remember when we were in high school and you had had to take the... Your debating in the class and you were forced to take one side and defend it. So, I was was at a Vertica conference one time up on stage with Curt Monash, and I had to take the NoSQL, the world is changing paradigm shift. And so just to be controversial, I said to him, Curt Monash, I said, who really needs acid compliance anyway? Tony Baer. And so, (chuckles) of course, his head exploded, but what are your thoughts (guests laughing) on all this? >> Well, my first thought is congratulations, Dave, for surviving being up on stage with Curt Monash. >> Amen. (group laughing) >> I definitely would concur with Carl. We actually are definitely seeing a SQL renaissance and if there's any proof of the pudding here, I see lakehouse is being icing on the cake. As Doug had predicted last year, now, (clears throat) for the record, I think, Doug was about a year ahead of time in his predictions that this year is really the year that I see (clears throat) the lakehouse ecosystems really firming up. You saw the first shots last year. But anyway, on this, data lakes will not go away. I've actually, I'm on the home stretch of doing a market, a landscape on the lakehouse. And lakehouse will not replace data lakes in terms of that. There is the need for those, data scientists who do know Python, who knows Spark, to go in there and basically do their thing without all the restrictions or the constraints of a pre-built, pre-designed table structure. I get that. Same thing for developing models. But on the other hand, there is huge need. Basically, (clears throat) maybe MongoDB was saying that we're not teaching SQL anymore. Well, maybe we have an oversupply of SQL developers. Well, I'm being facetious there, but there is a huge skills based in SQL. Analytics have been built on SQL. They came with lakehouse and why this really helps to fuel a SQL revival is that the core need in the data lake, what brought on the lakehouse was not so much SQL, it was a need for acid. And what was the best way to do it? It was through a relational table structure. So, the whole idea of acid in the lakehouse was not to turn it into a transaction database, but to make the data trusted, secure, and more granularly governed, where you could govern down to column and row level, which you really could not do in a data lake or a file system. So, while lakehouse can be queried in a manner, you can go in there with Python or whatever, it's built on a relational table structure. And so, for that end, for those types of data lakes, it becomes the end state. You cannot bypass that table structure as I learned the hard way during my research. So, the bottom line I'd say here is that lakehouse is proof that we're starting to see the revenge of the SQL nerds. (Dave chuckles) >> Excellent. Okay, let's bring up back up the predictions. Dave Menninger, this one's really thought-provoking and interesting. We're hearing things like data as code, new data applications, machines actually generating plans with no human involvement. And your prediction is the definition of data is expanding. What do you mean by that? >> So, I think, for too long, we've thought about data as the, I would say facts that we collect the readings off of devices and things like that, but data on its own is really insufficient. Organizations need to manipulate that data and examine derivatives of the data to really understand what's happening in their organization, why has it happened, and to project what might happen in the future. And my comment is that these data derivatives need to be supported and managed just like the data needs to be managed. We can't treat this as entirely separate. Think about all the governance discussions we've had. Think about the metadata discussions we've had. If you separate these things, now you've got more moving parts. We're talking about simplicity and simplifying the stack. So, if these things are treated separately, it creates much more complexity. I also think it creates a little bit of a myopic view on the part of the IT organizations that are acquiring these technologies. They need to think more broadly. So, for instance, metrics. Metric stores are becoming much more common part of the tooling that's part of a data platform. Similarly, feature stores are gaining traction. So, those are designed to promote the reuse and consistency across the AI and ML initiatives. The elements that are used in developing an AI or ML model. And let me go back to metrics and just clarify what I mean by that. So, any type of formula involving the data points. I'm distinguishing metrics from features that are used in AI and ML models. And the data platforms themselves are increasingly managing the models as an element of data. So, just like figuring out how to calculate a metric. Well, if you're going to have the features associated with an AI and ML model, you probably need to be managing the model that's associated with those features. The other element where I see expansion is around external data. Organizations for decades have been focused on the data that they generate within their own organization. We see more and more of these platforms acquiring and publishing data to external third-party sources, whether they're within some sort of a partner ecosystem or whether it's a commercial distribution of that information. And our research shows that when organizations use external data, they derive even more benefits from the various analyses that they're conducting. And the last great frontier in my opinion on this expanding world of data is the world of driver-based planning. Very few of the major data platform providers provide these capabilities today. These are the types of things you would do in a spreadsheet. And we all know the issues associated with spreadsheets. They're hard to govern, they're error-prone. And so, if we can take that type of analysis, collecting the occupancy of a rental property, the projected rise in rental rates, the fluctuations perhaps in occupancy, the interest rates associated with financing that property, we can project forward. And that's a very common thing to do. What the income might look like from that property income, the expenses, we can plan and purchase things appropriately. So, I think, we need this broader purview and I'm beginning to see some of those things happen. And the evidence today I would say, is more focused around the metric stores and the feature stores starting to see vendors offer those capabilities. And we're starting to see the ML ops elements of managing the AI and ML models find their way closer to the data platforms as well. >> Very interesting. When I hear metrics, I think of KPIs, I think of data apps, orchestrate people and places and things to optimize around a set of KPIs. It sounds like a metadata challenge more... Somebody once predicted they'll have more metadata than data. Carl, what are your thoughts on this prediction? >> Yeah, I think that what Dave is describing as data derivatives is in a way, another word for what I was calling operational metadata, which not about the data itself, but how it's used, where it came from, what the rules are governing it, and that kind of thing. If you have a rich enough set of those things, then not only can you do a model of how well your vacation property rental may do in terms of income, but also how well your application that's measuring that is doing for you. In other words, how many times have I used it, how much data have I used and what is the relationship between the data that I've used and the benefits that I've derived from using it? Well, we don't have ways of doing that. What's interesting to me is that folks in the content world are way ahead of us here, because they have always tracked their content using these kinds of attributes. Where did it come from? When was it created, when was it modified? Who modified it? And so on and so forth. We need to do more of that with the structure data that we have, so that we can track what it's used. And also, it tells us how well we're doing with it. Is it really benefiting us? Are we being efficient? Are there improvements in processes that we need to consider? Because maybe data gets created and then it isn't used or it gets used, but it gets altered in some way that actually misleads people. (laughs) So, we need the mechanisms to be able to do that. So, I would say that that's... And I'd say that it's true that we need that stuff. I think, that starting to expand is probably the right way to put it. It's going to be expanding for some time. I think, we're still a distance from having all that stuff really working together. >> Maybe we should say it's gestating. (Dave and Carl laughing) >> Sorry, if I may- >> Sanjeev, yeah, I was going to say this... Sanjeev, please comment. This sounds to me like it supports Zhamak Dehghani's principles, but please. >> Absolutely. So, whether we call it data mesh or not, I'm not getting into that conversation, (Dave chuckles) but data (audio breaking) (Tony laughing) everything that I'm hearing what Dave is saying, Carl, this is the year when data products will start to take off. I'm not saying they'll become mainstream. They may take a couple of years to become so, but this is data products, all this thing about vacation rentals and how is it doing, that data is coming from different sources. I'm packaging it into our data product. And to Carl's point, there's a whole operational metadata associated with it. The idea is for organizations to see things like developer productivity, how many releases am I doing of this? What data products are most popular? I'm actually in right now in the process of formulating this concept that just like we had data catalogs, we are very soon going to be requiring data products catalog. So, I can discover these data products. I'm not just creating data products left, right, and center. I need to know, do they already exist? What is the usage? If no one is using a data product, maybe I want to retire and save cost. But this is a data product. Now, there's a associated thing that is also getting debated quite a bit called data contracts. And a data contract to me is literally just formalization of all these aspects of a product. How do you use it? What is the SLA on it, what is the quality that I am prescribing? So, data product, in my opinion, shifts the conversation to the consumers or to the business people. Up to this point when, Dave, you're talking about data and all of data discovery curation is a very data producer-centric. So, I think, we'll see a shift more into the consumer space. >> Yeah. Dave, can I just jump in there just very quickly there, which is that what Sanjeev has been saying there, this is really central to what Zhamak has been talking about. It's basically about making, one, data products are about the lifecycle management of data. Metadata is just elemental to that. And essentially, one of the things that she calls for is making data products discoverable. That's exactly what Sanjeev was talking about. >> By the way, did everyone just no notice how Sanjeev just snuck in another prediction there? So, we've got- >> Yeah. (group laughing) >> But you- >> Can we also say that he snuck in, I think, the term that we'll remember today, which is metadata museums. >> Yeah, but- >> Yeah. >> And also comment to, Tony, to your last year's prediction, you're really talking about it's not something that you're going to buy from a vendor. >> No. >> It's very specific >> Mm-hmm. >> to an organization, their own data product. So, touche on that one. Okay, last prediction. Let's bring them up. Doug Henschen, BI analytics is headed to embedding. What does that mean? >> Well, we all know that conventional BI dashboarding reporting is really commoditized from a vendor perspective. It never enjoyed truly mainstream adoption. Always that 25% of employees are really using these things. I'm seeing rising interest in embedding concise analytics at the point of decision or better still, using analytics as triggers for automation and workflows, and not even necessitating human interaction with visualizations, for example, if we have confidence in the analytics. So, leading companies are pushing for next generation applications, part of this low-code, no-code movement we've seen. And they want to build that decision support right into the app. So, the analytic is right there. Leading enterprise apps vendors, Salesforce, SAP, Microsoft, Oracle, they're all building smart apps with the analytics predictions, even recommendations built into these applications. And I think, the progressive BI analytics vendors are supporting this idea of driving insight to action, not necessarily necessitating humans interacting with it if there's confidence. So, we want prediction, we want embedding, we want automation. This low-code, no-code development movement is very important to bringing the analytics to where people are doing their work. We got to move beyond the, what I call swivel chair integration, between where people do their work and going off to separate reports and dashboards, and having to interpret and analyze before you can go back and do take action. >> And Dave Menninger, today, if you want, analytics or you want to absorb what's happening in the business, you typically got to go ask an expert, and then wait. So, what are your thoughts on Doug's prediction? >> I'm in total agreement with Doug. I'm going to say that collectively... So, how did we get here? I'm going to say collectively as an industry, we made a mistake. We made BI and analytics separate from the operational systems. Now, okay, it wasn't really a mistake. We were limited by the technology available at the time. Decades ago, we had to separate these two systems, so that the analytics didn't impact the operations. You don't want the operations preventing you from being able to do a transaction. But we've gone beyond that now. We can bring these two systems and worlds together and organizations recognize that need to change. As Doug said, the majority of the workforce and the majority of organizations doesn't have access to analytics. That's wrong. (chuckles) We've got to change that. And one of the ways that's going to change is with embedded analytics. 2/3 of organizations recognize that embedded analytics are important and it even ranks higher in importance than AI and ML in those organizations. So, it's interesting. This is a really important topic to the organizations that are consuming these technologies. The good news is it works. Organizations that have embraced embedded analytics are more comfortable with self-service than those that have not, as opposed to turning somebody loose, in the wild with the data. They're given a guided path to the data. And the research shows that 65% of organizations that have adopted embedded analytics are comfortable with self-service compared with just 40% of organizations that are turning people loose in an ad hoc way with the data. So, totally behind Doug's predictions. >> Can I just break in with something here, a comment on what Dave said about what Doug said, which (laughs) is that I totally agree with what you said about embedded analytics. And at IDC, we made a prediction in our future intelligence, future of intelligence service three years ago that this was going to happen. And the thing that we're waiting for is for developers to build... You have to write the applications to work that way. It just doesn't happen automagically. Developers have to write applications that reference analytic data and apply it while they're running. And that could involve simple things like complex queries against the live data, which is through something that I've been calling analytic transaction processing. Or it could be through something more sophisticated that involves AI operations as Doug has been suggesting, where the result is enacted pretty much automatically unless the scores are too low and you need to have a human being look at it. So, I think that that is definitely something we've been watching for. I'm not sure how soon it will come, because it seems to take a long time for people to change their thinking. But I think, as Dave was saying, once they do and they apply these principles in their application development, the rewards are great. >> Yeah, this is very much, I would say, very consistent with what we were talking about, I was talking about before, about basically rethinking the modern data stack and going into more of an end-to-end solution solution. I think, that what we're talking about clearly here is operational analytics. There'll still be a need for your data scientists to go offline just in their data lakes to do all that very exploratory and that deep modeling. But clearly, it just makes sense to bring operational analytics into where people work into their workspace and further flatten that modern data stack. >> But with all this metadata and all this intelligence, we're talking about injecting AI into applications, it does seem like we're entering a new era of not only data, but new era of apps. Today, most applications are about filling forms out or codifying processes and require a human input. And it seems like there's enough data now and enough intelligence in the system that the system can actually pull data from, whether it's the transaction system, e-commerce, the supply chain, ERP, and actually do something with that data without human involvement, present it to humans. Do you guys see this as a new frontier? >> I think, that's certainly- >> Very much so, but it's going to take a while, as Carl said. You have to design it, you have to get the prediction into the system, you have to get the analytics at the point of decision has to be relevant to that decision point. >> And I also recall basically a lot of the ERP vendors back like 10 years ago, we're promising that. And the fact that we're still looking at the promises shows just how difficult, how much of a challenge it is to get to what Doug's saying. >> One element that could be applied in this case is (indistinct) architecture. If applications are developed that are event-driven rather than following the script or sequence that some programmer or designer had preconceived, then you'll have much more flexible applications. You can inject decisions at various points using this technology much more easily. It's a completely different way of writing applications. And it actually involves a lot more data, which is why we should all like it. (laughs) But in the end (Tony laughing) it's more stable, it's easier to manage, easier to maintain, and it's actually more efficient, which is the result of an MIT study from about 10 years ago, and still, we are not seeing this come to fruition in most business applications. >> And do you think it's going to require a new type of data platform database? Today, data's all far-flung. We see that's all over the clouds and at the edge. Today, you cache- >> We need a super cloud. >> You cache that data, you're throwing into memory. I mentioned, MySQL heat wave. There are other examples where it's a brute force approach, but maybe we need new ways of laying data out on disk and new database architectures, and just when we thought we had it all figured out. >> Well, without referring to disk, which to my mind, is almost like talking about cave painting. I think, that (Dave laughing) all the things that have been mentioned by all of us today are elements of what I'm talking about. In other words, the whole improvement of the data mesh, the improvement of metadata across the board and improvement of the ability to track data and judge its freshness the way we judge the freshness of a melon or something like that, to determine whether we can still use it. Is it still good? That kind of thing. Bringing together data from multiple sources dynamically and real-time requires all the things we've been talking about. All the predictions that we've talked about today add up to elements that can make this happen. >> Well, guys, it's always tremendous to get these wonderful minds together and get your insights, and I love how it shapes the outcome here of the predictions, and let's see how we did. We're going to leave it there. I want to thank Sanjeev, Tony, Carl, David, and Doug. Really appreciate the collaboration and thought that you guys put into these sessions. Really, thank you. >> Thank you. >> Thanks, Dave. >> Thank you for having us. >> Thanks. >> Thank you. >> All right, this is Dave Valente for theCUBE, signing off for now. Follow these guys on social media. Look for coverage on siliconangle.com, theCUBE.net. Thank you for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and pleased to tell you (Tony and Dave faintly speaks) that led them to their conclusion. down, the funding in VC IPO market. And I like how the fact And I happened to have tripped across I talked to Walmart in the prediction of graph databases. But I stand by the idea and maybe to the edge. You can apply graphs to great And so, it's going to streaming data permeates the landscape. and to be honest, I like the tough grading the next 20 to 25% of and of course, the degree of difficulty. that sits on the side, Thank you for that. And I have to disagree. So, the catalog becomes Do you have any stats for just the reasons that And a lot of those catalogs about the modern data stack. and more, the data lakehouse. and the application stack, So, the alternative is to have metadata that SQL is the killer app for big data. but in the perception of the marketplace, and I had to take the NoSQL, being up on stage with Curt Monash. (group laughing) is that the core need in the data lake, And your prediction is the and examine derivatives of the data to optimize around a set of KPIs. that folks in the content world (Dave and Carl laughing) going to say this... shifts the conversation to the consumers And essentially, one of the things (group laughing) the term that we'll remember today, to your last year's prediction, is headed to embedding. and going off to separate happening in the business, so that the analytics didn't And the thing that we're waiting for and that deep modeling. that the system can of decision has to be relevant And the fact that we're But in the end We see that's all over the You cache that data, and improvement of the and I love how it shapes the outcome here Thank you for watching.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Doug Henschen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Menninger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Doug | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Olofson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Menninger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tony Baer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tony | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Valente | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Collibra | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Curt Monash | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjeev Mohan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Christian Kleinerman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Valente | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Walmart | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sanjeev | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Constellation Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ventana Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Hazelcast | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tony Bear | PERSON | 0.99+ |
25% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
65% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
five-year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
TigerGraph | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
RisingWave Labs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Karl Soderlund, Palo Alto Networks | Palo Alto Networks Ignite22
the cube presents ignite 22. brought to you by Palo Alto Networks hey guys and girls welcome back to Las Vegas it's thecube we are live at Palo Alto networks ignite 22. this is day one of two days of cube coverage Lisa Martin here with Dave vellante Dave we've had great conversations today talking with Executives the partner ecosystem is evolving it's growing at Palo Alto networks going to be digging into that next well we heard a lot of talk about you know Palo Alto you know the goal 100 billion dollar you know market cap company and to me a way and I think a critical way in which you get there is partner with the ecosystem because you can't do it alone the power of many versus the resources of one agree completely agree we've got Carl Sutherland with us SVP of North America ecosystem sales at Palo Alto networks welcome to the cube thanks so much for having me it's great being here so here we are the first full day of the conference actually started yesterday with the partner Summit give the audience a flavor of the partner Summit who was there what was talked about what's the current voice of the partner these days yeah great questions so we had a 150 Partners from around the globe representing all of our different routes to Market and for us our partner Community is expanding we work with system integrators we work with gsis we work with service providers Distributors traditional value-added resellers so it was a whole host of partners that were there it was a c-level audience and we really talked about the direction of where we're going as a company how they can continue to invest with us and have greater success long term and so from a voice of the partner standpoint what they're here to do is share with us where they want to engage more how we can enable them to be successful you talked about the Power of One Versus a community we're really looking at a segment of the marketplace right now for us to scale and hit our aspirational goals we can't do it with Palo Alto Network employees we have an employee base of 12 000 people if you take our ecosystem it's over a hundred thousand employees so if we can get them aligned and selling and motivated it's going to be a good day for all of us what so what are they telling you where do they want to spend their time where do they want to add value where are they winning yeah that's a great question so there's a transformation that's going on right now in the partner Community what's happening is a lot of Partners going that are transitioning from what would be traditional transactional Partners or resale Partners to being services-led and the Market's driving them there and what I mean by that is that customers are in a desperate dire State needing assistance figuring out and solving these very complex security problems so if there is a subset of Partners out there that have the skill set and capabilities that can come in from a consultative standpoint help them to develop the structure through deployment a full-blown management and do life cycle management that's a tremendous value I mean the numbers you hear thrown around in the industry right now is up to seven million uh security I.T jobs right now that are out there the open head count is tremendous people can't hire people fast enough all of us in the industry are going through and trying to find early in career or college graduates so we can train quickly or cross-train from other segments to get them into cyber security so if our part of the community can continue to get skilled and expand it's only going to help and the cloud is obviously where does the cloud fit in Carl because you know a lot of the partners when the clouds really start on the Steep part of the s-curve are like we have an opportunity here and by the way if we don't transition our business we could get commoditized yes so that you know that but you were talking about the transactional we can help people move to the cloud and a big part of that has got to be we can secure them in the cloud because it's a more in a lot of ways you know Cloud security is great but in a lot of ways it adds complexity what are you hearing from the party yeah so we are fortunate at Palo Alto networks when you look across the three loud largest cloud service provider from a Google AWS and Microsoft Azure we're either their number one isv or absolutely their number one security ISP so we've got a great uh relationships with them now our partners are coming along and saying how do we transact how do we add value a lot of times that value to your question is wrapping services around it to make sure it's a successful deployment because exactly what you stated the complexity is an all-time high so how do we make sure that we can solve a complex problem in a short term while increasing their security posture and that's really the goal and so where there there's sometimes complexity and mystery there's opportunity and partners can be profitable in doing that I wrote a piece once chaos is cash I have a security you know the criminals and vendors as well yes yes where there is is challenge and complexity there is great opportunity yeah talk about some of the partner program Evolution and some of the things that were announced with respect to the next wave program just yesterday yeah so at next wave um the program's been around for 12 years we constantly are looking to make enhancements and how we make those enhancements are by going out and speaking with these partners and listening to what they need so I have the honor to get to represent what their needs are and how we bring it to market for them so a couple interesting announcements that we made yesterday first of all we announced a new structural format for the program which is really going to allow our different route to markets to have a program that's fit for them because in the past when we were just traditionally a firewall company when the ecosystem just meant resale it was an easy model to have it's complex right now sometimes it's resale sometimes it's influence sometimes its services only we really need to be flexible and credible so we announced a Services only path so if you are a consulting company if you are a insurance company and you want to bring opportunities and leads to Palo Alto Network and you want to provide the services if you're not interested in the transaction you don't want to get involved in that we now have a pathway for you to support you to enable you and Kennedy to give you recognition within Palo Alto networks from an alignment standpoint so we're super excited about that uh as I know you guys speak quite a bit about the managed Services industry so it's a red hot area within Palo Alto networks one of the needs out there was that all not all managed Service Partners are created equally and so some have fantastic capabilities some have gaps we were calling it a P2P part of the partner program within managed services so our two managed Services Partners can actually work together to solve the problem that the end user has and give them a better outcome and fill each other's gaps so candidly it's been going on for a while the partnering but we've never really recognized it so we really built a program around it and now are sponsoring and supporting it versus people doing it on a sidebar so those guys were here in force yesterday yes sir right and and so obviously a lot of energy I'm sure do you see a day where they're here in force on the show floor yeah and and how do you see that evolving so they are here enforcement just right here you see a few of them I'm looking at AWS who's our you know we are their largest isv I'm looking at CDW we had them on the floor is our if not largest second largest partner globally right now and continuing to grow at a rate well they will probably be our first billion dollar partner to think about the size and scale of that relationship and where we've come from um their name CDW don't they never really thought of CDW right as a as a security firm wow what a transformation but please carry on and think about that let's talk about CDW saying think about reach that CDW has it's a 23 billion dollar organization and in a way an inside out sales model meaning there's a tremendous reach they have from their inside sales team and the relationships that they have traditionally historically they were procurement relationships in a way and I said this to the CDW team they were the easy button in the past now what they're doing is they made Seven Acquisitions over the last two years all of them Services oriented so now they're coming in as a consultative Viewpoint and solving a lot of complex problems and I see Google Cloud right here another great partner for us that we continue to invest in we have a great amount of integration and Technology integration with them and so and those are the three that I'm seeing just looking over my left shoulder right if I turn around I'll probably name five more so the majority of this room are the partners that fall within our ecosystem today fantastic so okay so what's your vision for where you want to take this ecosystem because as I said at the top I mean ecosystems are sort of the Hallmark of a I guess you're not a cloud company see I think you of you as a cloud company and so okay good so and I know you don't own your own public cloud and you know your history is you had your own data centers but yeah but you're the security Cloud yeah and so a security Cloud any Cloud needs a great ecosystem so what's your vision for the ecosystem let's go you know five plus years out sure you we start with the end in mind and what I mean by that is we always start with the end user what's the end user's needs the end user today needs flexibility with how they consume the technology they need help in how they support and deploy the technology they need guidance in how they plan out for their future and what their growth is so what we're doing is building a very diverse set of Partners in our ecosystem that all have special skills that they bring to the table so when nikesh sits up here and talks about being a 10 billion or a 20 billion or a 50 billion dollar company we absolutely cannot do it without our ecosystem and without having a very diverse ecosystem that all has different skills that can help us scale because again Palo Alto does not want to be a services company right let's work with the people who are the best at that when we think about the deloittees and accentures and the value they have within the end user base and our joint customer base what a fantastic time to to partner together and solve those boardroom challenges and that's where I really see the vision is that at the boardroom we're building out a plan that's three to five years that's going to continue to increase their security posture because we're not thinking if we're not forward thinking like that will be left behind because the Bad actors are thinking about how they find the different areas to penetrate they're getting so sophisticated the badocracy adversaries they are well funded they're motivated Grant the ransomware attack numbers in terms of the Velocity the complexity yes no longer are we going to get if it's when yeah uh big challenge for organizations Acro across I mean really across an organization regardless of Industry are you guys having any conversations with boards in the partner organization to help align the board with the executive level and really not just have security as a board level initiative but actually being able to execute a strategy yeah and you you nailed it it's not an initiative the initiative to me means there's a beginning and an end right a strategy means there's going to be a comprehensive approach how you continue to improve and we are very fortunate that a lot of our largest Partners around the globe have that position within the boards where they are the trusted advisor so what we're doing now is enabling them and giving them the skills so they can have a more comprehensive conversation around our platform approach around the challenges you know BJ I knew who was with you earlier today likes to say that the average customer he goes and sees has 50 to 70 disparate Technologies within their environment how do you manage that how do you maintain it how do you do renewals oh and by the way most likely the people who actually initially procured that aren't with you anymore they're in a different company so the need for a platform approach is there more so than ever but the decision for the platform quite often has to come from the most senior levels within the organization because again I'm going to go back to your what was your chaos line that you said chaos is Cash chaos is Cash well also chaos is job security so if you're at at the lower level within an organization that chaos and that magic gives you a little job security but that's a short term long term you really need to think about how you're protecting the environment holistically so it is a boardroom decision down that we need to have and you know that chaos the the motivation for that piece that I wrote was from the criminals standpoint right and then I was like okay but there's great opportunities for the technology industry but but I think that you know where we're headed I wonder if I get your thoughts on thoughts on this Carlos we always talk about the Board Room I think we're going now Beyond it here I am you know I'm hypersensitive about my security I got password managers two-factor authentication I don't want SMS based two-factor authentication I want my own authenticator and that's still not enough yeah I got air gaps yeah you know for my crypto you know and I'm super paranoid my point is I think the the individuals are getting much more Savvy about security why because we've all been hacked you know it's like when you lost your data in the because you weren't backed up you know that never happens anymore it's in the cloud or you know some people have multiple backups so it's it's becoming a cultural Trend beyond the board and it's because of the board lord said hey this is really important and so I think it's not only top down I think you're going to see bottom up and middle out and the exciting part for Palo Alto networks is and maybe for you as well is there any more exciting environment to talk about that's rapidly changing and constantly changing you could come back next week and our conversation is going to change as far as what we're doing we constantly need to be thinking three steps ahead of where we're going to move and be flexible and dynamic enough to change and that's what's going to keep us ahead of the economy yeah there's no segment as Dynamic I mean data is dynamic but not as fast changing as cyber I mean because of the adversary as you mentioned I mean so smart so now now they have open adversary ecosystems I mean the adversaries are building ecosystems right absolutely insane I've got peers that are bad guys yeah right right chaos is Cash what's your favorite partner story that you think really demonstrates the value of the ecosystem that Palo Alto networks has built yeah so without sharing names I'll talk about a large U.S national partner that was very uh that was founded on a networking business and partnered with a very large networking company and built that business and was successful doing that they wanted to Pivot into the security space and very early on they made a commitment to Paulo and Ulta networks to say we're going to learn we're going to invest we're going to align with your sales force and we're going to work together and right now they are our largest partner globally and they grew 70 year over year wow so think about that this is not on a small base we're talking about a half a billion dollars in Revenue growing at 70 year over year because to your point earlier it wasn't an initiative it was a strategy and they're executing on the strategy so I tell a lot of we call War Stories like that to other partners that are looking to invest from different markets it could be a large service provider that's you know trying to transform themselves into a security player and talk about the potential of what it could be in for their Marketplace and by the way I say publicly quite often Palo Alto networks will be your most profitable relationship that you have because of the total addressable Market that we're going after because of the solutions that we bring to Market and because of the opportunity within the end users right now and we're excited I want to come back to the mssp in that in its context so we've seen the rise of the mssp and particularly you know we were talking earlier I think it was with Wendy that uh no it was with CDW like 50 of the organizations in North America don't even have a sock yeah right so they need a service provider to come out so you said we you don't want to be in the services business right you're a product company right and that's from a financial standpoint that's phenomenal you're roughly 50 billion dollar market cap company let's let's call it six billion in Revenue so that's a nice Revenue multiple 8X you know and and and the Market's down so you're a 10x Revenue multiple company typically services companies are a 1x or a 2X are you seeing a change there where technology is giving these service providers operating leverage where they're able to scale whether it's because of the cloud because of the Partnerships the Eco would you call it before the the peer-to-peer ecosystem yes like the Gap fillers yes are you do you see the economics of services changing yeah from a baseline economic standpoint not looking at the valuations but let's look at it from a an opportunity to be profitable with Palo Alto networks we know if you are just doing the transaction you have a certain range of margin that you're going to make in the opportunity we know if you wrap services around it you're going to get 3x to 4X that margin we know that if it's managed services and there's life cycle management you're talking 5x to 8X that initial transaction and by the way it's recurring revenue for them so when you think about it if you just do a transaction you're only recurring revenue is a renewal that's predictable but it's not extremely profitable now we're saying the operating leverage you get is if you wrap that services and you're going to have an increased opportunity for a greater margin and it's sticky it's hard to replace a partner who's adding value to your team and A lot of times you walk in the end user you can't tell who the partner is and who the end user is because they are one team that's value yes and that's going to drive ebit yep for your partners and that's going to drive valuation you know you know I want to come back to valuation not that I'm not you can do that okay but because I was I predicted I do my prediction post every year and I predicted last year that we're going to see you know a Spate of MSS mssps I predicted you're going to see someone go public nobody's going public these days but I still think it's a great business yeah that's an untapped opportunity it's not an 8X or it's not a software marginal economics or but it's really sticky super high value yeah and I think it has you know long-term potential yeah to your point if you want to talk valuations for a second let's look at what's happened to the marketplace over the last 12 to 18 months the large majority of the non-public partners that we work with have taken on Capital from private Equity the private Equity that has come in has challenged them to go through a transformation that transformation is you we need you to be Services LED and that service is value because they believe there's going to is going to be a great greater evaluation from that end and they'll be able to scale and grow and stay ahead of the market doing that so when we have conversations when I have conversations yes I'm talking about the technology and the direction of the company but I'm also in there as a consultant saying where's the direction of your company and how do we have this great platform and how do we build it into your business and you wrap services around it and those are the conversations that CEOs want to have when I'm sitting down with our partner CEOs I bet they don't want to talk about our product being better than someone else's product they want to talk about the direction and health of their business yeah it's their business that's a business discussion business decision and they're thinking about okay what's my five-year strategic plan because they got to make bets yeah they're going to bet on a platform that they can add value to that creates that flywheel effect and they get a bet on your ecosystem as well correct oh correct absolutely good to be the leader it's good to be a leader and you know I'm sure as you've heard a few times we believe that economic headwinds are going to favor the market leaders and economic headwinds are going to favor the platform approach so we're going in more aggressive with our partner Community than ever before and there's just so much energy and excitement I feel like I keep on using that term over and over again but that's really what we walk away with last question for you is we have about 30 seconds left a lot of momentum in the partner ecosystem as you've described eloquently what's next what's next what's next yeah so when I I rolled out the strategy for what's next and what it is is a foundational platform that is going to allow flexibility for the partners and for them to decide where they want to invest and it can be in new areas it can be I went online closer with the cloud service providers it could be I want to build a managed Services business can you help us do this it could be I want to go through and I want to drive greater penetration into geographical areas we haven't been before so again we're almost acting as a consultant looking at what they're going from the direction and building a program and a platform where we can grow and work with them it's exciting it's fun it's great highly collaborative highly collaborative highly collaborative thank you for joining us on the program on the partner program the ecosystem Better Together what you guys are doing and ultimately how it benefits the end user customer we really appreciate your insights excellent thank you thank you so much appreciate it all right our pleasure for our guests and Dave vellante I'm Lisa Martin you're watching the cube the leader in live Enterprise and emerging Tech coverage [Music]
SUMMARY :
it's good to be a leader and you know
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five-year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CDW | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
3x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Karl Soderlund | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Network | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
4X | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
23 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
150 Partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Carlos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Carl Sutherland | PERSON | 0.99+ |
8X | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kennedy | PERSON | 0.98+ |
100 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
70 year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over a hundred thousand employees | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
70 year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Paulo | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
50 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2X | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Ulta | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
70 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
BJ | PERSON | 0.97+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two-factor | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Palo Alto networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Palo Alto networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Google AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
up to seven million | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
today | DATE | 0.94+ |
about 30 seconds | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
about a half a billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first full day | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
one team | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Alto | LOCATION | 0.93+ |
50 billion dollar | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
second largest partner | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
earlier today | DATE | 0.88+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Acro | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
U.S | LOCATION | 0.84+ |
three steps | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Azure | TITLE | 0.82+ |
50 of the organizations | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
10x | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
last two years | DATE | 0.77+ |
Palo | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
Unpacking Palo Alto Networks Ignite22 | Palo Alto Networks Ignite22
>> Announcer: TheCUBE presents Ignite '22, brought to you by Palo Alto Networks. >> Welcome back to Las Vegas. It's theCUBE covering Palo Alto Networks '22, from the MGM Grand, Lisa Martin with Dave Vellante. Dave, we are going to unpack in the next few minutes what we heard and saw at day one of Palo Alto Networks, Ignite. A lot of great conversations, some great guests on the program today. >> Yeah last event, CUBE event of the year. Probably last major tech event of the year. It's kind of an interesting choice of timing, two weeks after reInvent. But you know, this crowd is it's a lot of like network engineers, SecOps pros. There's not a lot of suits here. I think they were here yesterday, all the partners. >> Yeah. >> We talked to Carl Sunderland about, Hey, these, these guys want to know how do I grow my business? You know, so it was a lot of C level executives talking about their business, and how they partner with Palo Alto to grow. The crowd today is really, you know hardcore security professionals. >> Yeah. >> So we're hearing a story of consolidation. >> Yes. >> No surprise. We've talked about that and reported on it, you know, quite extensively. The one big takeaway, and I want, I came in, as you know, wanting to understand, okay, can you through m and a maintain, you know, build a suite of great, big portfolio and at the same time maintain best of breed? And the answer was consistent. We heard it from Nikesh, we heard it from Nir Zuk. The answer was you can't be best of breed without having that large portfolio, single data lake, you know? Single version of the truth, of there is such a thing. That was interesting, that in security, you have to have that visibility. I would imagine, that's true for a lot of things. Data, see what Snowflake and Databricks are both trying to do, now AWS. So to join, we heard that last week, so that was one of the big takeaways. What were your, some of your thoughts? >> Just impressed with the level of threat intelligence that Unit 42 has done. I mean, we had Wendy Whitmer on, and she was one of the alumni, great guest. The landscape has changed so dramatically. Every business, in any industry, nobody's safe. They have such great intelligence on what's going on with malware, with ransomware, with Smishing, that they're able to get, help organizations on their way to becoming cyber resilient. You know, we've been talking a lot about cyber resiliency lately. I always want to understand, well what does it mean? How do different organizations and customers define it? Can they actually really get there? And Wendy talked about yes, it is a journey, but organizations can achieve cyber resiliency. But they need to partner with Palo Alto Networks to be able to understand the landscape and ensure that they've got security established across their organization, as it's now growingly Multicloud. >> Yeah, she's a blonde-haired Wonder Woman, superhero. I always ask security pros that question. But you know, when you talk to people like Wendy Whitmore, Kevin Mandy is somebody else. And the people at AWS, or the big cloud companies, who are on the inside, looking at the threat intelligence. They have so much data, and they have so much knowledge. They can, they analyze, they could identify the fingerprints of nation states, different, you know, criminal organizations. And the the one thing, I think it was Wendy who said, maybe it was somebody else, I think it was Wendy, that they're they're tearing down and reforming, right? >> Yes. >> After they're discovered. Okay, they pack up and leave. They're like, you know, Oceans 11. >> Yep. >> Okay. And then they recruit them and bring them back in. So that was really fascinating. Nir Zuk, we'd never had him on theCUBE before. He was tremendous founder and and CTO of Palo Alto Networks, very opinionated. You know, very clear thinker, basically saying, look you're SOC is going to be run by AI >> Yeah. >> within the next five years. And machines are going to do things that humans can't do at scale, is really what he was saying. And then they're going to get better at that, and they're going to do other things that you have done well that they haven't done well, and then they're going to do well. And so, this is an interesting discussion about you know, I remember, you know we had an event with MIT. Eric Brynjolfsson and Andy McAfee, they wrote the book "Second Machine Age." And they made the point, machines have always replaced humans. This is the first time ever that machines are replacing humans in cognitive functions. So what does that mean? That means that humans have to rely on, you know, creativity. There's got to be new training, new thinking. So it's not like you're going to be out of a job, you're just going to be doing a different job. >> Right. I thought Nir Zuk did a great job of explaining that. We often hear people that are concerned with machines taking jobs. He did a great job of, and you did a great recap, of articulating the value that both bring, and the opportunities to the humans that the machines actually deliver as well. >> Yeah so, you know, we didn't, we didn't get deep into the products today. Tomorrow we're going to have a little bit more deep dive on products. We did, we had some partners on, AWS came on, talked about their ecosystem. BJ Jenkins so, you know, BJ Jenkins again I mean super senior executive. And if I were Nikesh, he's doing exactly what I would do. Putting him on a plane and saying, go meet with customers, go make rain, right? And that's what he's doing is, he's an individual who really knows how to interact with the C-suite, has driven value, you know, over the years. So they've got that angle goin', they're driving go to market. They've got the technology piece and they've, they got to build out the ecosystem. That I think is the big opportunity for them. You know, if they're going to double as a company, this ecosystem has to quadruple. >> Yeah, yeah. >> In my opinion. And I, we saw the same thing at CrowdStrike. We said the same thing about Service Now in 2013. And so, what's happened is the GSIs, the global system integrators start to get involved. They start to partner with them and then they get to get that flywheel effect. And then there's a supercloud, I think that, you know I think Nir Zuk said, Hey, we are basically building out that, he didn't use the term supercloud. But, we're building out that cross cloud capability. You don't need another stove pipe for the edge. You know, so they got on-prem, they got AWS, Azure, you said you have to, absolutely have to run on Microsoft. 'Cause I don't believe today, right? Today they run on, I heard somebody say they run on AWS and Google. >> Yeah. >> I haven't heard much about Microsoft. >> Right. >> Both AWS and Google are here. Microsoft, the bigger competitor in security, but Nir Zuk was unequivocal. Yes, of course you have to run, you got to run it on an Alibaba cloud. He didn't say that, but if you want to secure the China cloud, you got to run on Alibaba. >> Absolutely. >> And Oracle he said. Didn't mention IBM, but no reason they can't run on IBM's cloud. But unless IBM doesn't want 'em to. >> Well they're very customer focused and customer first. So it'll be interesting to see if customers take them in that direction. >> Well it's a good point, right? If customers say, Hey we want you running in this cloud, they will. And, but he did call out Oracle, which I thought was interesting. And so, Oracle's all about mission critical data, mission critical apps. So, you know, that's a good sign. You know, I mean there's so much opportunity in cyber, but so much confusion. You know, sneak had a raise today. It was a down round, no surprise there. But you know, these companies are going to start getting tight on cash, and you've seen layoffs, right? And so, I dunno who said it, I think it was Carl at the end said in a downturn, the strongest companies come out stronger. And that's generally, generally been the case. That kind of rich get richer. We see that in the last downturn? Yes and no, to a certain extent. It's still all about execution. I mean I think about EMC coming out of the last downturn. They did come out stronger and then they started to rocket, but then look what happened. They couldn't remain independent. They were just using m and a as a technique to hide the warts. You know so, what Nir Zuk said that was most interesting to me is when we acquire, we acquire with the intent of integrating. ServiceNow has a similar philosophy. I think that's why they've been somewhat successful. And Oracle, for sure, has had a similar philosophy. So, and that idea of shifting labor into vendor R and D has always been a winning formula. >> I think we heard that today. Excited for day two tomorrow. We've got some great conversations. We're going to be able to talk with some customers, the chief product officer is on. So we have more great content coming from our last live show over the year. Dave, it's been great co-hosting day one with you. Look forward to doing it tomorrow. >> Yeah, thanks for doing this. >> All right. >> All right. For Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin. You've been watching theCUBE, the leader in live enterprise and emerging tech coverage. See you tomorrow. (gentle music fades)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Palo Alto Networks. in the next few minutes CUBE event of the year. We talked to Carl Sunderland So we're hearing a And the answer was consistent. that they're able to But you know, when you talk to people They're like, you know, Oceans 11. And then they recruit them and then they're going to do well. and the opportunities to the humans You know, if they're going to double I think that, you know Yes, of course you have to run, And Oracle he said. So it'll be interesting to see We see that in the last downturn? I think we heard that today. See you tomorrow.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
BJ Jenkins | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Sunderland | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kevin Mandy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wendy Whitmore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Brynjolfsson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nir Zuk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy McAfee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wendy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Second Machine Age | TITLE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Wendy Whitmer | PERSON | 0.98+ |
TheCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Wonder Woman | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
ServiceNow | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Multicloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Oceans 11 | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Ignite '22 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Unit 42 | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
MGM Grand | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
Single | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
day two | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.91+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Azure | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
single data | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Ignite | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
Palo Alto Networks '22 | EVENT | 0.75+ |
next five years | DATE | 0.72+ |
David Cardenas, County of Los Angeles Department of Public Health | UiPath Forward 5
(upbeat music) >> TheCUBE presents UiPath Forward 5. Brought to you by UiPath. >> Hello and welcome back to TheCUBE's coverage of UiPath Forward 5. We're here in Las Vegas at the Venetian Convention Center. This is day two. We're wrapping up Dave Nicholson and Dave Vellante. This is the fourth time theCUBE has been at UiPath Forward. And we've seen the transformation of the company from, essentially, what was a really interesting and easy to adopt point product to now one through acquisitions, IPO, has made a number of enhancements to its platform. David Cardenas is here. Deputy Director of Operations for County of Los Angeles, the Department of Public Health. David, good to see you. Thanks for coming on theCUBE. >> Thanks for having me on guys. Appreciate it. >> So what is your role? What does it have to do with automation? >> So I had been, actually started off in the IT space within the public health. Had served as a CIO previously, but now been moving into broader operations. And I basically manage all of the back office operations for the department, HR, IT, finance, all that. >> So you've had a wild ride in the last couple of years. >> Yeah, I think, like I've been talking earlier, it's just been, the last two years have just been horrendous. It's been a really difficult experience for us. >> Yeah, and I mean, the scars are there, and maybe permanently. But it also had major effects on organizations, on operations that, again, seem to be permanent. How would you describe the situation in your organization? >> So I think it, the urgency that came along with the pandemic response, kind of required us to look at things, you know, differently. We had to be, realize we had to be a lot more nimble than when we were and try to figure out how to enhance our operations. But really look at the core of what we're doing and figure out how it is to be more efficient. So I think we've kind of seen it as an opportunity to really examine ourselves a little bit more deeply and see what things we need to do to kind of, to fix our operations and get things on a better path. >> You know, I think a lot of organizations we talked to say that. But I want to understand how you handle this is, you didn't have time to sit back in the middle of the pandemic. >> Yeah. >> And then as you exit, what I call the isolation economy, people are so burned out, you know? So how do you deal with that organizational trauma? Say, okay now, let's sit back and think about this. Do people, are they eager to do so? Do they have the appetite for it? What's that dynamic like? >> So I think certainly there's a level of exhaustion inside the organization. I can't say that there isn't because it's just been, you know, two years of 24/7/365 kind of work. And that's tough on any organization. But I think what we realize is that there's, you know, we need to move into action quickly 'cause we don't know what's going to come next, right? And we're expecting that this is just a sign of what's to come and that we're just at the start of that stage of, we're just going to see a lot more outbreaks, we're going to see a lot more conditions kind of hitting us. And if we're not prepared for that, we're not going to be able to respond for the, and preserve the health and safety of our citizens, right? So I think we're taking a very active, like, look at these opportunities and see what we've done and say how do we now make the changes that we made in response to the pandemic permanent so that the next time this comes at us, we won't have to be struggling the way that we were to try to figure things out because we'll have such a better foundation in place to be able to move things forward. >> I mean, I've never served in the military, but I imagine that when you're in the military, you're always prepared for some kind of, you know, in your world, code red, right? >> Yeah. >> So it's like this code red culture. And that seems to have carried through, right? People are, you know, constantly aware that, wow. We got caught off guard and we don't want that to happen again. Because that was a big part of the trauma was just the unknown- >> Right. >> and the lack of preparedness. So thinking about technology and its role in helping you to prepare for that type of uncertainty. Can you describe how you're applying technology to prepare for the next unknown? >> So I think, so that first part of what you said, I think the difficulty we've always had in the public health side is that there's the, generally the approach to healthcare is very reactionary, right? Your first interface with the healthcare system is, "I'm going to go see my doctor; I'm going to go to the hospital." The work that we do in public health is to try to do everything we can to keep you out of that, right? So it's broad-based messaging, social media now is going to put us out there. But also, to be able to surveil disease in a different way. And so the holy grail for us in healthcare has always been, at least on the public health side, has been to try to see how can we tap in more actively that when you go see the doctor or when you go to the hospital, how can I get access to that information very, very quickly so that I know, and can see, and surveil my entire county in my jurisdiction and know, oh, there's an outbreak of disease happening in this section of the county. We're 10 million people with, you know, hundreds of square miles inside of LA. There are places where we can see very, you know, specific targets that we know we have to hit. But the data's a little stale and we find out several months after. We need to figure out a way to do that more actively. Technology's going to be our path to be able to capture that information more actively and come up on something a little bit, so we can track things faster and be able to respond more quickly. So that's our focus for all our technology implementations, automation like UiPath has offered us and other things, is around how to gather that information more quickly and put that into action so we can do quick interventions. >> People have notoriously short memories. Please tell me (chuckles) any of the friction that you may have experienced in years past before the pandemic. That those friction points where people are thinking, "Eh, what are the odds?" >> Yeah. "Eh, I've got finite budget, I think I'm going to spend it on this thing over here." Do you, are you able to still ride sort of the wave of mind share at this point when putting programs together for the future? >> So whatever friction was there during the pandemic wiped away. I mean, we had amazing collaboration with the medical provider community, our hospital partners. The healthcare system in LA was working very closely with us to make sure that we were responding. And there is that wave that we are trying to make sure that we use this as an opportunity to kind of ride it so that we can implement all the things that we want. 'Cause we don't know how long that's going to last us. The last time that I saw anything this large was after the anthrax attacks and the bioterrorism attacks that we had after 9/11. >> How interesting. >> Public health was really in lens at that point. And we had a huge infusion of funding, a lot of support from stakeholders, both politically and within the healthcare system. And we were able to make some large steps in movement at that point. This feels the same but in a larger scale because now it touched every part of the infrastructure. And we saw how society really had to react to what was going on in a different way than anyone has ever prepared for. And so now is we think is a time where we know that people are making more investments. And our success is going to be their success in the longterm. >> And you have to know that expectations are now set- >> Extremely high. >> at a completely different level, right? >> Yes, absolutely. >> There is no, "Oh, we don't have enough PPE." >> Correct. >> Right? >> David: Correct. >> The the expectation level is, hey, you should have learned from all of- >> We should have it; we can deliver it, We'll have it at the ready when we need to provide it. Yes, absolutely. >> Okay, so I sort of mentioned, we're, David cubed on theCUBE (all laughing). So three Daves. You spoke today at the conference? >> Actually I'm speaking later actually in the session in an hour or so. >> Oh Okay. My understanding is that you've got this concept of putting humans at the center of the automation. What does that mean? Why is that important? Help us understand that. >> So I think what we found in the crisis is that the high demand for information was something we hadn't seen before, right? We're one of the largest media markets in the United States. And what we really had trouble with is trying to figure out how to serve the residents, to provide them the information that we needed to provide to them. And so what we had traditionally done is press releases, you know, just general marketing campaigns, billboards, trying to send our message out. And when you're talking about a pandemic where on a daily basis, hour-by-hour people wanted to know what was going on in their local communities. Like, we had to change the way that we focused on. So we started thinking about, what is the information that the residents of our county need? And how can we set up an infrastructure to sustain the feeding of that? Because if we can provide more information, people will make their own personal decisions around their personal risk, their personal safety measures they need to take, and do so more actively. More so than, you know, one of us going on camera to say, "This is what you should do." They can look for themselves and look at the data that's in front of them and be able to make those choices for themselves, right? And so we needed to make sure that everything that we were doing wasn't built around feeding it to our political stakeholders, which are important stakeholders. We needed to make sure that they're aware and are messaging out, and our leadership are aware. But it's what could we give the public to be able to make them have access to information that we were collecting on an every single day basis to be able to make the decisions for their lives. And so the automation was key to that. We were at the beginning of the pandemic just had tons and tons of resources that we were throwing at the problem that was, our systems were slow, we didn't have good ability to move data back and forth between our systems, and we needed a stop-gap solution to really fill that need and be able to make the data cycles to meet the data cycles. We had basically every day had to deliver reports and analytics and dashboards by like 10 o'clock in the morning because we knew that the 12 an hour and the five-hour news cycles were going to hit and the press were going to then take those and message out. And the public started to kind of come in at that same time and look at 10 and 11 o'clock and 12 o'clock. >> Yeah. >> We could see it from how many hits were hitting our website, looking for that information. So when we failed and had a cycle where that data cycle didn't work and we couldn't deliver, the public would let us know, the press would let us know, the stakeholders would let us know. We had never experienced anything like that before, right. Where people had like this voracious appetite for the information. So we needed to have a very bulletproof process to make sure that every single 24 hours we were delivering that data, making it available at the ready. >> Software robots enabled that. >> Exactly. >> Okay. And so how were you able to implement that so quickly within such a traumatic environment? >> So I think, I guess necessity is always the mother of invention. It kind of drove us to go real quickly to look at what we had. We had data entry operations set up where we had dozens and dozens of people whose sole job in life on a 24-hour cycle was to receive medical reports that we we're getting, interview data that's coming from our case interviews, hospitalization data that was coming in through all these different channels. And it was all coming in in various forms. And they were entering that into our systems of record. And that's what we were using, extracts from that system of record, what was using to generate the data analyses in our systems and our dashboards. And so we couldn't rely on those after a while because the data was coming in at such high volume. There wasn't enough data entry staff to be able to fit the need, right? And so we needed to replace those humans and take them out of that data entry cycle, pop in the bots. And so what we started to look at is, let's pick off the, where it is that that data entry cycle starts and see what we could do to kind of replace that cycle. And we started off with a very discreet workload that was focused on some of our case interview data that was being turned into PDFs that somebody was using to enter into our systems. And we said, "Well before you do that," since we can't import into the systems 'cause it wasn't working, the import utilities weren't working. We got 'em into simple Excel spreadsheets, mapped those to the fields in our systems and let the bots do that over and over again. And we just started off with that one-use case and just tuned it and went cycle after cycle. The bots just got better and better to the point where we had almost like 95% success rates on each submission of data transactions that we did every day. >> Okay, and you applied that automation, I don't know, how many bots was it roughly? >> We're now at like 30; we started with about five. >> Okay, oh, interesting. So you started with five and you applied 'em to this specific use case to handle the velocity and volume of data- >> Correct. >> that was coming in. But that's obviously dynamic and it's changed. >> Absolutely. >> I presume it's shifted to other areas now. So how did you take what you learned there and then apply it to other use cases in other parts of the organization? >> So, fortunately for us, the process that was being used to capture the information to generate the dashboards and the analyses for the case interview data, which is what we started with- >> Yeah. >> Was essentially being used the same for the hospitalization data that we were getting and for tracking deaths as they were coming in as well. And so the bots essentially were just, we just took one process, take the same bots, copy them over essentially, and had them follow the very same process. We didn't try to introduce any different workflow than what was being done for the first one so we could replicate quickly. So I think it was lucky for us a lot- >> Dave V.: I was going to say, was that luck or by design? >> It was the same people doing the same analyses, right? So in the end they were thinking about how to be efficient themselves. So they kind of had coalesced around a similar process. And so it was kind of like fortunate, but it was by design in terms of how they- >> Dave V.: It was logical to them. >> Logical to them to make it. >> Interesting. >> So for us to be able to insert the bots became pretty easy on the front end. It's just now as we're trying to now expand to other areas that were now encountering like unique processes that we just can't replicate that quickly. We're having to like now dig into. >> So how are you handling that? First of all, how are you determining which processes? Is it sort of process driven? Is it data driven? How do you determine that? >> So obviously right now the focus still is COVID. So the the priorities scale that we've set internally for analyzing those opportunities really is centered around, you know, which things are really going to help our pandemic response, right? We're expecting another surge that's going to happen probably in the next couple of weeks. That'll probably take us through December. Hopefully, at that point, things start to calm down. But that means high-data volume again; these same process. So we're looking at optimizing the processes that we have, what can we do to make those cycles better, faster, you know, what else can we add? The data teams haven't stopped to try to figure out how else can they turn out new data reports, new data analysis, to give us a different perspective on the new variants and the new different outbreaks and hotspots that are popping up. And so we also have to kind of keep up with where they're going on these data dashboards. So they're adding more data into these reports so we know we have to optimize that. And then there's these kind of tangential work. So for example, COVID brought about, unfortunately, a lot of domestic violence reports. And so we have a lot of domestic violence agencies that we work with and that we have interactions with and to monitor their work, we have certain processes. So that's kind of like COVID-adjacent. But it's because it's such a very critical task, we're looking at how we can kind of help in those processes and areas. Same thing in like in our substance abuse area. We have substance use disorder treatment services that we provide. And we're delivering those at a higher rate because COVID kind of created more of a crisis than we would've liked. And so that's how we're prioritizing. It's really about what is the social need, what does the community need, and how can we put the technology work in those areas? >> So how do you envision the future of automation in your organization and the future of your organization? What does that look like? Paint a picture for us. >> So I'm hoping that it really does, you know, so we're going to take everything that's COVID related in the disease control areas, both in terms of our laboratory operations, in terms of our clinic operations, the way we respond, vaccination campaigns, things of that nature. And we're going to look at it to see what can efficiencies can we do there because it's a natural outgrowth of everything we've done on COVID up to this point. So, you know, it's almost like it's as simple as you're just replicating it with another disease. The disease might have different characteristics, but the work process that we follow is very similar. It's not like we're going to change everything and do something completely different for a respiratory condition as we would for some other type of foodborne condition or something else that might happen. So we certainly see very easy opportunities to just to grow out what we've already done in terms of the processes is to do that. So that's wave one, is really focus on that grow out. The second piece I think is to look at these kind of other general kind of community-based type of operations and see what operations we can do there to kind of implement some improvements there. And then I'm certainly in my new role of, in Deputy Director of Operation, I'm a CIO before. Now that I'm in this operations role, I have access to the full administrative apparatus for the department. And believe me, there's enough to keep me busy there. (Dave V. Laughing) And so that's going to be kind of my third prong is to kind of look at the implement there. >> Awesome. Go ahead, Dave. >> Yeah, so, this is going to be taking a step back, kind of a higher level view. If we could direct the same level of rigor and attention towards some other thing that we've directed towards COVID, if you could snap your fingers and make that happen, what would that thing be in the arena of public health in LA County in particular, or if you want California, United States. What is something that you feel maybe needs more attention that it's getting right now? >> So I think I touched on it a little bit earlier, but I think it's the thing we've been always been trying to get to is how to really become just very intentional about how we share data more actively, right? I don't have to know everything about you, but there are certain things I care about when you go to the doctor for that doctor and that physician to tell me. Our physicians, our healthcare system as you know, is always under a lot of pressure. Doctors don't have the time to sit down and write a form out for me and tell me everything that's going on. During COVID they did because they were, they cared about their patients so much and knew, I need to know what's going on at every single moment. And if I don't tell you what's going on in my office, you'll never know and can't tell us what's going on in the community. So they had a vested interest in telling us. But on a normal day-to-day, they don't have the time for that. I got to replace that. We got to make sure that when we get to, not me only, but everyone in this public health community has to be focused and working with our healthcare partners to automate the dissemination and the distribution of information so that I have the information at my fingers, that I can then tell you, "Here's what's going on in your local community," down to your neighborhood, down to your zip code, your census tracked, down to your neighbors' homes. We'll be able to tell you, "This is your risk. Here are the things that are going on. This is what you have to watch out for." And the more that we can be more that focused and laser-focused on meeting that goal, we will be able to do our job more effectively. >> And you can do that while preserving people's privacy. >> Privacy, absolutely. >> Yeah, absolutely. But if people are informed then they can make their own decisions. >> Correct. >> And they're not frustrated at the systems. David, we got to wrap. >> Sure. >> But maybe you can help us. What's your impression of the, first of all, is this your first Forward? You've been to others? >> This is my first time. >> Okay. >> My first time. >> What's your sort of takeaway when you go back to the office or home and people say, "Hey, how was the show? What, what'd you learn?" What are you going to say? >> Well, from just seeing all the partners here and kind of seeing all the different events I've been able to go to and the sessions there's, you don't know many times I've gone to and say, "We've got to be doing that." And so there's certainly these opportunities for, you know, more AI, more automation opportunities that we have not, we just haven't even touched on really. I think that we really need to do that. I have to be able to, as a public institution at some point our budgets get capped. We only have so much that we're going to receive. Even riding this wave, there's only so much we're going to be able to get. So we have to be very efficient and use our resources more. There's a lot more that we can do with AI, a lot more with the tools that we saw, some of the work product that are coming out at this conference that we think we can directly apply to kind of take the humans out of that, their traditional roles, get them doing higher level work so I can get the most out of them and have this other more mundane type of work, just have the systems just do it. I don't need anybody doing that necessarily, that work. I need to be able to leverage them for other higher level capabilities. >> Well thank you for that. Thanks for coming on theCUBE and really appreciate. Dave- >> It's been great talking to you guys, thank you. >> Dave, you know, I love software shows because the business impact is so enormous and I especially love cool software shows. You know, this first of all, the venue. 3,500 people here. Very cool venue. I like the fact that it's not like booth in your face, booth competition. I mean I love VMware, VMworld, VMware Explore. But it's like, "My booth is bigger than your booth." This is really nice and clean, and it's all about the experience. >> A lot of steak, not as much sizzle. >> Yeah, definitely. >> A lot of steak. >> And the customer content at the UiPath events is always outstanding. But we are entering a new era for UiPath, and we're talking. We heard a lot about the Enterprise platform. You know, the big thing is this company's been in this quarterly shock-lock since last April when it went public. And it hasn't all been pretty. And so new co-CEO comes in, they've got, you know, resetting priorities around financials, go to market, they've got to have profitable growth. So watching that that closely. But also product innovation so the co-CEOs will be able to split that up, split their duties up. Daniel Dines the product visionary, product guru. Rob Enslin, you know- making the operations work. >> Operations execution business, yeah. >> We heard that Carl Eschenbach did the introduction. Carl's a major operator, wanted that DNA into the company. 'Cause they got to keep product innovation. And I want to, I want to see R&D spending, stay relatively high. >> Product innovation, but under the heading of platform. And that's the key thing is just not being that tool set. The positioning has been, I think, accurate that, you know, over history, we started with these RPA tools and now we've moved into business process automation and now we're moving into new frontiers where, where truly, AI and ML are being leveraged. I love the re-infer story about going in and using natural national (chuckles) national, natural language processing. I can't even say it, to go through messaging. That's sort of a next-level of intelligence to be able to automate things that couldn't be automated before. So that whole platform story is key. And they seem to have made a pretty good case for their journey into platform as far as I'm concerned. >> Well, yeah, to me again. So it's always about the customers, want to come to an event like this, you listen to what they say in the keynotes and then you listen to what the customers say. And there's a very strong alignment in the UiPath community between, you know, the marketing and the actual implementation. You know, marketing's always going to be ahead. But, we saw this a couple of years ago with platform. And now we're seeing it, you know, throughout the customer base, 10,000+ customers. I think this company could have, you know, easily double, tripled, maybe even 10x that. All right, we got to wrap. Dave Nicholson, thank you. Two weeks in a row. Good job. And let's see. Check out siliconangle.com for all the news. Check out thecube.net; wikibon.com has the research. We'll be on the road as usual. theCUBE, you can follow us. UiPath Forward 5, Dave Vellante for Dave Nicholson. We're out and we'll see you next time. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by UiPath. and easy to adopt point product Thanks for having me on guys. of the back office operations in the last couple of years. the last two years have Yeah, and I mean, the scars are there, is to be more efficient. in the middle of the pandemic. I call the isolation economy, so that the next time this comes at us, And that seems to have and the lack of preparedness. is to try to do everything we can any of the friction that I think I'm going to spend to make sure that we were responding. And our success is going to be "Oh, we don't have enough PPE." We'll have it at the ready So three Daves. in the session in an hour or so. center of the automation. And the public started to kind So we needed to have a And so how were you able to And we said, "Well before you do that," we started with about five. to handle the velocity that was coming in. and then apply it to other use cases And so the bots essentially were just, Dave V.: I was going to say, So in the end they were thinking about that we just can't replicate that quickly. the processes that we have, the future of automation in terms of the processes is to do that. What is something that you And the more that we can be more And you can do that while preserving But if people are informed at the systems. You've been to others? There's a lot more that we can do with AI, Well thank you for that. talking to you guys, thank you. and it's all about the experience. And the customer content that DNA into the company. And they seem to have made So it's always about the customers,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Cardenas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five-hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rob Enslin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
LA | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Daniel Dines | PERSON | 0.99+ |
December | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 | DATE | 0.99+ |
24-hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Excel | TITLE | 0.99+ |
3,500 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 o'clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
Two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last April | DATE | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 o'clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 an hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
UiPath Forward 5 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
TheCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
thecube.net | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Department of Public Health | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave V. Laughing | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Venetian Convention Center | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
LA County | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
11 o'clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
third prong | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 million people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fourth time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each submission | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Dave V. | PERSON | 0.97+ |
9/11 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
an hour | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
wave one | EVENT | 0.95+ |
10,000+ customers | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
hundreds of square miles | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
95% | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
VMware Explore | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
next couple of weeks | DATE | 0.92+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.91+ |
24 hours | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
one process | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
first part | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
day two | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
couple of years ago | DATE | 0.86+ |
Los Angeles Department of Public Health | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
anthrax attacks | EVENT | 0.85+ |
last couple of years | DATE | 0.84+ |
wikibon.com | OTHER | 0.84+ |
tons and tons | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
Rob Enslin, UiPath & Daniel Dines, UiPath | UiPath Forward 5
>> Male: TheCUBE presents, UIPATH, Forward 5 brought to you by, UIPATH. >> Okay the party has started here at forward 5 UIPATH big customer event if you're watching the cube. We're wrapping up day one with the co-CE0 segment. Daniel Dines is here. He's the founder and Co-CEO of UIPATH and Rob Enslin, is co-CEO. Gents, great to see you. Thanks for spending some time with us. I know you're super busy. >> Thanks Dave. >> So I've been looking forward to this. Daniel you know I've followed the company for a long time. The really interesting path you took, to get to where you are today. How did you guys meet? And why did you decide to hire Rob? >> Male: (laughs) >> Rob: Well let me start. I uh, I was looking for a partner. Actually, in our work to your stand here, we are talking about how, how you feel in this job. You feel so alone. Because you are the center of all pressure points. And having a partner, having someone that has your back, it's kind of awesome. So I was looking for a partner. And our current friend, Carl Escenbach, he introduced us to each other, and we instantly clicked. And this is the type of job where it's uh either work well or it doesn't. It cannot be anything in the middle. >> Right, okay with Carl, we know Carl well. Awesome operator. Knows the business super well. So Rob, what attracted you to UIPATH? You had a great situation at google. You guys were growing like crazy. Why did you decide to come here? What did you see that attracted you? >> Yeah you know when I, when I went to google, I went to google because I really believed that data and AI was necessary for companies. And business is to be competitive in the future. And we did some great stuff at google cloud in the 3 years. But I knew UIPATH from a couple of years ago when they were mainly a RPA space. And I just felt that there was a place in time when automation was going expand. And as I sat down with Carl a couple of times, spoke to carl. And then I sat down with Daniel, I knew that there was something special with UIPATH, that could be a generational opportunity. Not any for myself but for the company in the future. And then I, you know I got to know Daniel. And at this stage of my career I was like, I'm pretty fussy about what I want to do and what I want and where I want to go. First of all, I want to go to a company that had great product, had a great culture, and I wanted to work with somebody that we could shake the future together and you know, Daniel and I just hit it off from the very first time we met. He got to meet my family, my dogs and we did the whole, we did the whole courting thing before we actually decided this was going to be a good thing for both of us. >> Dave: That's good. >> Rob: Yeah. >> Dave: You got to meet the family. That's very good. >> We just had, John Furrier and I just had, Mohit Aron and Sanjay Poonen into out studio. Cause Mohit, you know, formal google. Long time. And they decided to kind of split duties. Mohit's going into product, he didn't keep his CEO title. He walked. How are you guys splitting you time? What are each of you going to, responsible for? >> Daniel: Well its, its kind of similar. On a day by day operation I, I rely heavily on Rob. We do it together. Strategic decisions about the company's destiny. I'm doing mostly the product these days. Which is a big relief for me. And I think we also split a bit of customers visit. Which is great. I still enjoy meeting customers. I need, customers are food for my cause. >> Dave: (laughs) yeah and your awesome product visionary. You've been there since day one. Now Rob, you said in the key note today that you've seen around about a hundred customers. You've transverse the world. What did you learn from them that informed you? That gave you confidence that the the move to the internet platform, even though you had already started that. >> Male: Yeah. >> But you're really doubling down on that >> Rob: You know when I... >> from a stand point. >> Rob: You know Dave, when you think about it, like I was, I was so impressed that Daniel had the vision to create a platform 3 years ago. >> Dave: Yeah. >> All right. And as we went around the world. As I went around the world, and it was one of the very first things I've seen. I've got to understand how customers see UIPATH, from their advantage point. What are they looking for from us? Why is this company, why doe customers like this company so much? And as I went around the world. I went to Asia a couple, I went to Asia, Australia, Singapore, Japan. I was in Europe twice. We did the trip together. We went to visit customers. And it was very much the same thing. Helps us expand automation faster. And we are so surprise, at the break of your platform. We never knew that. And so it kind of just had, for me, it was conviction. It's like, this walls is the right decision you've made. There's so much opportunity there. And that's, you know that's kind of what I've learned through the last four five months. >> Dave: Now as you know Daniel, I've written a lot about your company. One of the things I've said is that, that start ups, if I can call you that back pre-IPO, typically don't have as much international exposure as UIPATH had. I mean you sort of, you sort of started as an international company and became more US centric. You said, in the, in the key note today, you're talking to Ray Wong about people may don't understand that challenges of FX. Point being, when you convert international dollars into US dollars there are less of them cause the dollars stronger. But still, I've always felt like that international footprint is an advantage. Rob you came from SAP, you know, again European based company. I don't, (stutters), do you regret that? Now? I mean I know it's technical, I'm sure you don't, but talk about that sort of international exposure? Why that's a long term benefit. >> Well, you, first of all, you expand faster. I think we expanded faster than our competition because our global footprint was larger. And we had the courage. Go in Japan, for instance. Everybody told me, it's impossible to make for such a small starter. It's impossible to make a business in Japan. But we didn't believe it. We're just crazy and we went there, and be built a very sizable business in Japan. Fifty-five percent of our revenue, even today, it's outside U.S. Now of course that has a down side. When uh, When the local currencies, you know, are losing the value compared to the dollars, we're impacted. As we go to... to investors, until now, so we are seeing like a (indistinct) in terms of ARI. It's huge. Only because (indistinct) and losing the business in Russia. But it still, it's the strength of our company. Things will come back. And then, you know, the growth engine will re-accelerate again. >> Dave: Yeah but when the dollars weakens that'll be in your favor. Rob I want to pick up on something you said today in your keynote. You went back and started, you know the cycles of ERP and you know, internet, et cetera. I kind of have a love hate with ERP. I have to be honest. >> Male: (laughing) >> But it, but but (chuckles) but if I go back to that. Late eighties nineties, you wouldn't have be able to pick SAP as the winner. And then SAP emerged. You know, very clearly. But the more interesting thing, is that the customers who are implementing ERP well. The practitioners did better than their peers, and dominated their industries. And their stocks went up. Their evaluations went up. Different worlds obviously but, do you see the same thing happening with RPA and automation? What gives you confidence that that's the case? >> I absolutely do see the same thing happening with automation and RPA being a part of, in being a part of that. The reason, the reason I believe that is speed is so critical. (stutters) And if you think about how hard it is for a CIO or a c level executive to consume the technology coming at them, plus all the changes in the world being thrown at them. It's compiling and compiling and compiling. We have an incredible solution, that can help companies. And there comes certain times, the love outcomes to the business. Like no one else gets. And when I see that, I view that as just like the beginning of what's going to happen in the future so, in many ways, and I've said this to many of my friends, it feels like 1992, 1993 to me. And it's interesting because no one really understood then why SAP would be great in 1992 and 93. And they got a couple of things right. They got the eco system right. Their new partners were important. And the knew they needed to drive business outcome for companies, in which they did. And so I feel like we are in a very similar place. Very different technology obviously. And the speed of change now is so dramatic, compared to what it was. And there's very few technology that can provide that level of speed and accomodation to their customers. >> All right, let's talk about priorities. You guys got a lot of work to do and you've, you've laid it out to the financial community. You've got to have profitable growth, because of FX, it part, you've lowered your forecast. But I think there's some conservative in their as well. Um, but you got to do that balance. You've given some guidance on gross margins. Cloud maybe brings that down a little bit. RnD I saw wide range. Thirteen to seventeen percent. I hope you keep spending on RnD. Big fan of that. You know stock buybacks and, RnD if in your position are going to be better. And the product priorities, continue to build that out. But question, let's start with the product. So you've got an on-prem stack and you've got a cloud stack that's emerging, how do you balance those out? How do you do the integration? You've done a great job with the integration. Does it, are you concerned about your ability to continue to work at that speed with two code bases? I wonder if you could address that? >> Daniel: We've become a cloud first company. We deliver all of our products first in the cloud. We've deliver on the two week (indistinct) in the cloud. So that helps us integrate quite fast. I think we made a very good business decision to build our cloud team in Seattle. In Bellevue to be specific. And we have access to great talent that knows how to build serious cloud service. Which is hard to find dollar. And uh, so, and also we, we have, we benef- one of our only benefits was, we have the really good architecture. We have an architecture that work easily on-prem and on the cloud. And even today, our work flow foundation, our local designers, were easy to modernize. So right now we are launching studio weapon. But behind the scene, it's the same workflow engine. Our customers don't have to rewrite anything. It just works. And it does the same to take our own brand product and brand it in the multicloud. So, it's, there is no friction at all. Actually cloud is just helping us accelerate. But we benefit then again of a really solid architectural foundation. >> Daniel: Architecture matters. We've seen that in this industry. We got the B52s rocking out in the background, I love it, but I've got so many questions for you guys. I want to talk about the go to market. Because Rob, it's obviously a strength of yours. You've come in. You've communicated to the street, that you're reshaping the sales floors. Are they lowering the ratios of sales? People, the customers at the high end, mid range as well, using digital. I mean the numbers are one to ten now. At the top. One to maybe fifty at the mid range. Where are you in terms of that journey? You've got to find people, you got to train them, how do you get the productivity out of those guys? Take us through your thinking there? >> Rob: Yeah firstly, I think we have enough resources. Having resources is not an issue. Um, we have an incredible vehicle to acquire customers inside the company. Our digital sales motion, it's probably the best I've seen. And so we have the ability to acquire customers really fast. And we get the first workload in really fast. The challenge is we need to, we need to be able to drive a (indistinct) model and we graduate customs when we acquire them into the direct sales floors. And then direct sales floors, we're not going to go one to thirty, we're talking one to ten for the direct sales floor. And even the high up in the pyramid, we want to have an even denser model than that. And the whole purpose is to drive the time to consumption much quicker, much faster. So we know exactly if we acquire a customer, will they spend? Do they have a (indistinct) spend? On what level do they have a (indistinct) spend? And therefore when we capture them, we can immediately surround them, and put the right resources so we can grow faster. We think this will have a significant impact on the organization. We'll start to implement certain pieces in the next quarter. Um, things like packaging solutions. Putting them in, enabling the sales organization. And buy the beginning of next year, we'll be ready to actually go full board, globally. We already put some pieces in place when I joined. Chris Weber, my chief business officer, did a great job doing some of those pieces. So we're on the journey already. >> Dave: Yeah and even before you guys were public and you weren't publishing your NRR numbers. Our ETR survey partner, we, we always thought you had very low churn. And I think you broke out just yesterday. The, the NRR for overseas vs U.S, U.S I think was 140 plus percent. >> Male: Yeah >> Very very strong. A little, a little less overseas but the churn is still very low. >> Male: Yep. >> Okay so that's super positive. Customer affinity, I was wanted to code these events. I listen to the key notes very carefully, and then interview customers on the cube, and I try to identify, is there alignment there? And I see very strong alignment, I have to say, and strong customer affinity. So that's in your favor. I have, Daniel, I got another question for you on product. What is Symantec automation? What the heck is that? Can you explain that? I don't understand >> Dave, have you seen the demo in my (indistinct)? >> Dave: You know, I had to leave and do interviews, so I, uh, I missed it. >> I think, I think that demo answer complete your question. So in the s-, you know there saying that great, you can not distinguish great technology by magic. I think technology should be simple. And we, we show today, one of the simplest demo that you can imagine. But it's so, such a complex technology behind the scene, that you also can not imagine. So what was demo? We show how one business user, without any technical skills, can build any type of document. Can be a passport, can be an invoice, can be a legal (indistinct), and just go, "I want to copy data from here, and I want to paste data there". Can be a spreadsheet, can be another obligation, and like a human user, without understanding, without having prior knowledge about data, document layout, about screens, screens layouts, nothing, we analyze real time. Document. We discover, we discover the meaning of the information. We analyze the screen. We understand the screen but we understand the meaning of the screen. And we understand how the information in one side relate to the other side. And we just connects the dots and we copy the information and we paste it. A job that you'll do as a human user, maybe three minutes, is done in ten seconds. This is powerful. >> Yeah that is powerful. Thank you for that. I mean, and you take the date, whether it's transaction data or unstructured data and and and bring meaning out of it. That's powerful. Last question and I'll let you guys go. Rob, you got traders, and you've got long term investors. All right traders going to be defensive, today. I get that. Make the case for UIPATH, for long term investors. >> Rob: I think we're going to be a multi-gern- multi-billion company and we're going to be a generational company of our time. And we will define enterprise automation. And it's going to be a long term game and we feel like really strong that we'll be the lead in that game. >> Dave: Guys, thanks so much for coming to the cube. Great show. Always fun at UiPath Forward. Really appreciate your time. Thank you. >> Thanks dave. >> Appreciate it as well. >> Okay wrap it up, day one, we're here tomorrow, first thing, Dave Vellante and Dave Nicholson. Thanks for watching, forward 5, Uipath big customer event, we'll see you tomorrow. (music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by, UIPATH. Okay the party has started to get to where you are today. It cannot be anything in the middle. So Rob, what attracted you to UIPATH? And then I, you know I got to know Daniel. Dave: You got to meet the And they decided to kind of split duties. And I think we also split the move to the internet platform, that Daniel had the vision And that's, you know that's I mean you sort of, you sort of started When the local currencies, you know, I have to be honest. is that the customers who the love outcomes to the business. And the product priorities, And it does the same to I mean the numbers are one And so we have the ability to And I think you broke out just yesterday. but the churn is still very low. I listen to the key notes very carefully, to leave and do interviews, And we just connects the dots I mean, and you take the date, And it's going to be a long term game much for coming to the cube. we'll see you tomorrow.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Daniel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Weber | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Seattle | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl Escenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Singapore | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
1992 | DATE | 0.99+ |
UiPath | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rob Enslin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bellevue | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Sanjay Poonen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Russia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fifty-five percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
UIPATH | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ray Wong | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Symantec | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
thirty | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thirteen | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mohit | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ten seconds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
93 | DATE | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1993 | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Daniel Dines | PERSON | 0.99+ |
carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ten | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SAP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
fifty | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Karl Mattson, Noname Security | AWS Startup Showcase S2 E4 | Cybersecurity
>>Hello, everyone. Welcome to the cubes presentation of the a startup showcase. This is our season two episode four of the ongoing series covering exciting hot startups from the a AWS ecosystem. And here we talk about cybersecurity. I'm John furrier, your host we're joined by Carl Mattson, CISO, chief information security officer of no name security, keep alumni. We just chatted with you at reinforce a business event. We're here to talk about securing APIs from code to production. Carl, thanks for joining. >>Good to see you again. Thanks for the invitation, John. >>You know, one of the hottest topics right now about APIs is, you know, it's a double edged sword, you know, on one hand, it's the goodness of cloud APIs make the cloud. That's the API first. Now you're starting to see them all over the place. Is APIs everywhere, securing them and manage them. It's really a top conversation at many levels. One, you're gonna have a great API, but if you're gonna manipulate the business logic, that's a problem too. So a lot going on with APIs, they're the underpinnings of the modern enterprise. So take us through your view here. How are you guys looking at this? You want to continue to use APIs, they're critical connective tissue in the cloud, but you also gotta have good plumbing. Where, what do you do? How do you secure that? How do you manage it? How do you lock it down? >>Yeah, so the, the more critical APIs become the more important it becomes to look at the, the API as really a, a, a unique class of assets, because the, the security controls we employ from configuration management and asset management, application security, both testing and, and protection like, like EDR, the, the, the platforms that we use to control our environments. They're, they're, they're poorly suited for APIs. And so >>As the API takes prominence in the organization, it goes from this sort of edge case of, of, of a utility now to like a real, a real crown jewel asset. And we have to have, you know, controls and, and technologies in place and, and, and skilled teams that can really focus in on those controls that are, that are unique to the API, especially necessary when the API is carrying like business critical workloads or sensitive data for customers. So we really have to, to sharpen our tools, so to speak, to, to focus on the API as the centerpiece of a, of an application security program, >>You know, you guys have a comprehensive view. I know the philosophy of the company is rooted in, in, in API life cycle development management runtime. Can you take a minute to explain and give an overview of no name security? And then I wanna jump into specifically the security platform and the capabilities. >>Sure. So we're an API security company just under three years old now. And, and we we've taken a new look at the API, looking at it from a, from a, a full lifecycle perspective. So it, it, isn't new to application security professionals that APIs are, are a software asset that needs to be tested for security, vulnerabilities, security testing prior to moving into production. But the reality is, is the API security exposures that are hitting the news almost every day. A lot of those things have to do with things like runtime errors and misconfigurations or changes made on the fly, cuz APIs are, are changed very rapidly. So in order for us to counter API risks, we have to look at the, the full life cycle from, from the moment the developer begins, coding the source code level through the testing gates, through the, the operational configuration. And then to that really sophisticated piece of looking at the business logic. And, and as you mentioned, the, the business logic of the API is, is unique and can be compromised with, with exploits that, that are specific to an API. So looking at the whole continuum of API controls, that's what we focused on. >>It's interesting, you know, we've had APIs for a while. I mean, I've never heard and seen so much activity now more than ever around APIs and security. Why is it recently we're seeing this conversation increase with specific solutions and why are we seeing more breaches and concerns about security? Because APIs are hardened. I mean, like, what's the big deal. Why now what's the big focus? Why is APIs becoming more in the conversation for CSOs and companies to secure? And why is it a problem? >>Well, take, take APIs that we had, you know, eight, 10 years ago, most of those were, were internally facing APIs. And so there were a lot of elements of the API design that we would not have put in place if we had intended that to be public facing authentication and authorization. That that was, is we kind of get away with a little bit of sloppy hygiene when it's internal to the network. But now that we're exposing those APIs and we're publishing APIs to the world, there's a degree of precision required. So when we, when we put an API out there for public consumption, the stakes are just much higher. The level of precision we need the business criticality, just the operational viability and the integrity of that API has to be precise in a way that really wasn't necessary when the API was sort of a general purpose internal network utility as it was in the past. And then the other, other area of course, is then just the sheer use of a API at the infrastructure layer. So you think about AWS, for example, most of the workloads in the modern cloud, they communicate and talk via API. And so those are even if they're internally facing APIs misconfigurations can occur and they could be public facing, or they could be compromised. And so we wanna look at all, all of the sort of facets of APIs, because now there's so much at stake with getting API security, right. >>You know, this brings up the whole conversation around API to API, and you guys talk about life cycle, right? The full life cycle of an API. Can you take me through that and what you mean by that? Because, you know, some people will say, Hey, APIs are pretty straightforward. You got source code, you can secure it. Code scanning, do a pen test. We're done why the full cycle approach is it because APIs are talking to third parties? Is it because what I mean, what's the reason what, what's the focus, why full life cycle of an API? Why should a company take this approach? >>Sure. So there's, there's really three sort of primary control areas that we look at for, for APIs as like what I call the traditional controls. There would be those to, to test and ensure that the source code itself has as quality or is, is secure. And that can, that can, of course, usually a step one. And that's, that's an important thing to, to do, but let's say let's for the sake of discussion that API that is designed securely is deployed into production, but the production environment in which it's deployed, doesn't protect that API the way that the developer intended. So a great example would be if an API gateway doesn't enforce the authentication policy intended by the developer. And so there we have, there's not the developer's fault. Now we have a misconfiguration in production. And so that's a, that's a type of example also where now a, an attacker can send a sort of a single request to that API without authentication or with, you know, misformed authentication types and, and succeed resulting in data. >>The waft didn't protect against it. It was secure code. And so when we look at the sequence of API controls, they all really have to be in sync because source code is really the first and most important job, but good, good API design and source code doesn't solve all challenges for their production environment. We have to look at the whole life cycle in order to counter the risk IBM's research last year in its X worth survey, estimated that 60% of all API breaches are due to misconfiguration, not to source code design. And so that's really where we have to marry the two of the runtime protection configuration management with the, the, the source code testing and design. >>It's, it's interesting, you know, we've all been around the block, we've seen the early days and you know, it was really great back in the day you sling an API, Hey, you know, Carl, you have an API for that. Oh, sure. I'll bang it out tonight. You know? So, so the, you know, they've gotten better, I'm over simplifying, but you get the idea they've been kind of really cool to work with and connect with systems. It's now plumbing. Okay. So organizations have, are dealing with this, they're dealing with APIs and more of them, how do they know where they stand? Is there like a API discovery capability? What do they do? What does a CSO do? What does a staff do saying, okay, you know what? We don't wanna stop the API movement cuz that's key to the cloud. How do we reign it in? How do we reign in the chaos? What do they do? Is there playbook? What does, how does an organization know exactly where it stands with the state of their APIs? >>Yeah. That, and that's usually where we started a discussion with a, with a customer is, is, is a diagnosis, right? Because when we, when we look at sort of diagnosing what our API risk exposure, the, you know, the, the first critical control is always know your assets and, and that we, we have to discover them. So we, we, we employ usually discovery as the very first step to see the full ecosystem of APIs, whether they're internal, external facing, whether they're routed through a gateway or whether they're routed through a WF, we have to see the full picture and then analyze that API footprint in terms of its network context, it's vulnerabilities, it's configuration qualities so that we can see a picture of where we are now in, in any particular organization, we may find that there's a, a, a, a high quality of source code. >>Perhaps the gaps are in configuration, or we may see the reverse. And so we, we don't necessarily make an assumption about what we'll find, but we know that that observability is really the, the first step in that, in that process is just to really get a firm sort of objective understanding of, of where the APIs are. And, and the really important part about the, the observability to the API inventory is to do it with the context also of the sense of the data types. Because, you know, for example, we see organizations, our own research showed that for organizations over 10,000 employees, the average population of APIs is over 25,000 in each organization, 25,000 AP thousand APIs is an extraordinary amount to, to even contemplate a human understanding of. So we have to fingerprint our APIs. We have to look at the sensitive data types so that we can apply our intellect and our resources towards protecting those APIs, which have, which are carrying sensitive data, or which are carrying critical workloads, because there are a lot of APIs that still remain today, even sort of internally facing utilities, work courses that keep the lights on, but not particularly high risk when it comes to sensitive data. >>So that, that, that triage process of like really honing in on the, on the high risk activity or the high risk APIs that they're carrying sensitive data, and then then sort of risk exposure assessing them and to see where an organization is. That's always the first step, >>You know, it's interesting. I like your approach of having this security platform that gives the security teams, the ability to kinda let the developers do their thing and, and then have this kind of security ops kind of platform to watch and monitor and any potential attacks. So I can see the picture there. I have to ask you though, as a CSO, I mean, what's different now, because back in the old days where API's even on the radar and two, there's a big discussion around software supply chain. This kind of this API is now a new area. As you'd been referring to people, stealing data, things are in transit with APIs. What is the, the big picture, if you had to kind of scope out the magnitude of like the API problem and, and relevance for a fellow CSO, how, how would you have that conversation? You'd be like, Hey, APIs are outta control. You gotta reign it in. Or is it a 10 and a 10? Is it a eight? I mean, yep. Take me through a conversation you're having with security teams or other CSOs around the magnitude of the scoped scoping the problem. >>Yeah. So I, I think of the, the, the API sort of problem space has a lot of echoes to the, to the conversations and the thought processes we were having about public cloud adoption a few years ago. Right. But there was, there were early adopters of public cloud and, and over the course of time, there was sort of a, an acquiescence to public cloud services. And now we have like actually like robust enterprise grade controls available in public cloud. And now we're all racing to get there. If we, if we have anything in the data center left, we're, we're trying to get to the public cloud as fast as possible. And so I think organization by organization, you'll, you'll see a, a, a reminiscent sort of trajectory of, of API utilization, because like an application we're out of gone are the days of the monolithic application, where it's a single, you know, a single website with one code base. >>And I kind of compare that to the data center, this comparison, which is the monolithic application is now sort of being decomposed into microservices and APIs. There are different differences in terms of how far along that decomposition into microservices and organization is. But we definitely see that the, that that trend continues and that applications in the, you know, three to five to 10 year timeframe, they increasingly become only APIs. So that an organization's app development team is almost exclusively creating APIs as, as the, as the output of software development. Whereas there's a, there's a journey to, towards that path that we see. And so, so a security team looking at this problem set, what I, you know, advise for, for a CISO. The looking at this maybe for the first time is to think about this as this is the competency that we, our security teams need to have. That competency may, may be at different degrees of criticality, depending on where that company is in transition. But it's not a, it's not a question of if it's a question of when and how fast do we need to develop this competency in a team because our applications will become almost exclusively APIs over time, just like our infrastructures are on the way to becoming almost exclusively public cloud hosted over time. >>Yeah. I mean, get on the API bus basically is the message like, look it, if you're not on this, you're gonna have a lot of problems. So in a way there's a proactive nature here for security teams at the same time, it's still out there and growing, I mean, the DevOps movement was essentially kind of cavalier, very Maverick oriented, sling APIs around no problem, Linga Franco connecting to other systems and API to an endpoint to another application. That's what it was. And so as it matures, it becomes much more of a, as you say, connective tissue in the cloud native world, this is real. You agree with that obviously? >>Yeah, absolutely. I mean, I think that the, I think that these, these API connections are, are, are the connective tissue of most of what we do right now. Even if we are, are not, you know, presently conscious of it, but they're, they're increasingly gonna become more and more central. So that's, that's, that's a, that's a journey whether, whether the, the focus on API security is to let's say, put the toothpaste back in the tube for something that's already broken, or whether it is preventative or prep preparing for where the organization goes in the future. But both of those, both of those are true. Or both of those are valid reasons to emphasize the investment in API security as a, as a talent processes, technologies all the above. >>Okay. You sold me on I'm the customer for a minute. Okay. And now I'm gonna replay back to you. Hey, Carl, love it. You sold me on this. I'm gonna get out front we're we're in lift and shift mode, but we can see APIs as we start building out our cloud native. And, but I'm really trying to hire a team. I got a skills gap here too. Yep. That's one customer. Yep. The other customers, Hey man, we've been on this train for a while. Kyle. We, we, we feel you, we in DevOps pioneer, we're now scaling out. We got all kinds of sprawl, API sprawl. How do I reign it in? And what do you guys do? What's your answer to those scenarios from a security platform perspective and how does that, what's the value proposition in those scenarios? >>I think the value proposition of what we've done is really to, to lean into the API as the, as the answer key to the problem set. So, you know, whether it's integrating security testing into a code repo, or a C I C D pipeline, we can automate security testing and we can do that very efficiently in, in such a way that one applic when a one API security specialist with the right tools, it ins insulates the organization from having to go out and hire 10 more people, because they've all, all of a sudden have this explosive growth and development. There's so much about API security that can capitalize on automation and capitalize on API integrations. So the API integrations with web application firewalls, with SIM systems, those types of workflows that we can automate really do empower a team to, to use automation to scale and to approach the problem set without needing to go to the, the, sort of the impossible ask of growing these growing teams of people with special skills and, and who aren't available anyways, or they're extremely expensive. So we definitely see ourselves as, as a, as a sort of leaning into the API as, as part of the answer and creating opportunities for automation. >>Yeah. So I got one more kind of customer role play here. I says, I love this. This is a great conversation. You know, there's always the, the person in the room, Carl, hold on, boss. This is gonna complicate everything on the network layer, application changes. There's a lot of risks here. I'm nervous. What's your, how do you guys handle that objection that comes up all the time. You know, the, the person that's always blocking deals like, oh, it's risky implementing no name or this approach. How do you, how do you address the frictionless nature of developers? Wanna try stuff now they wanna get it in and they wanna try things. How do you answer the quote, complication or risk to network and application changes? >>Sure. Two, two really specific answers. The, the first is, is for the developers. We wanna put a API security in their hands because when they can, when they can test and model the security risks on their APIs, while they're developing, like in their IDE and in their code repos, they can iterate through security fixes and bugs like lightning fast. And they, and developers Le really appreciate that. They appreciate having the instant feedback loop within their workspace, within their workbench. So developers love being able to self-service security. And we want to empower developers to, to do that. Self-service rather than tossing code over the fence and waiting two weeks for the security team to test it, then tossing it back with a list of bugs and defects that annoys everybody. It's an inefficient. So >>For the record, just for the record, you guys are self-service to the developers. >>Yeah. Self-service to the developers. And that's really by customer sort of configuration choices. There are configuration choices that have, for example, the security team, establishing policy, establishing boundaries for testing activities that allow the developers to test source code iterate through, you know, defect, fixes, things like that. And then perhaps you establish like a firm control gate that says that, you know, vulnerabilities of, of medium and above are a, have to be remediated prior to that code committing to the next gate. That's the type of control that the security policy owner can can apply, but yes, the developers can self-service service and the, and the security team can set the threshold by which the, the, the, the source code moves through the SDLC. Everybody will. Yep. Exactly. And, and, but we're, we have to, we have to practice that too, because that's a, that's a new way of, of, of the security team and the developers interacting. >>So we, we, we, we have to have patterns that that teams can then adopt procedurally because we aren't, we aren't yet accustomed to having a lot of procedures that work that way. So yeah, we, we have templates, we've got professional services that we want to help those teams get that, that equation, right? Because it it's a, it's a truly win-win situation when you can really stick the landing on getting the developers, the self-service options with the security team, having the confidence level that the controls are employed. And then on, on the network side, by the way, I, I too am mortified of breaking infrastructure and, and which is exactly why, you know, what, what we do architecturally out of band is, is really a, a game changer because there are technologies we can put in, in line, there are disruptors and operational risks that we can incur when we are, where we utilizing a technology that, that can break things, can break business, critical traffic. >>So what we do is we lean into the, the, the sort of the network nodes and the, and the hosts that the organization already has identifying those APIs, creating the behavioral models that really identify misuse in progress, and then automate, blocking, but doing that out of, out of band, that's really important. That's how I feel about our infrastructure. I, I don't want sort of unintended disruption. I want, I want to utilize a platform that's out of band that I can use. That's much more lightweight than, you know, putting another box in, in the network line. Yeah, >>What's interesting is what you're talking about is kind of the new school of thought. And the script has flipped. The old school was solve complexity with more complexity, get in the way, inject some measurements, software agents on the network, get in the way and the developer, Hey, here's a new tool. We agreed in a, in a vacuum, go do this. I think now more than ever, developers are setting the agenda on, on, on the tooling, if it's, and it has to be self-service at our super cloud event that was validated across the board. That if it's self-service, it's gotta be self-service for the developer. Otherwise they won't use it pretty much. >>Oh, well, I couldn't agree more. And the other part too, is like, no matter what business we're in the security business is, is yeah, it has to honor like the, the, the business need for innovation. We have to honor the business need for, for, for speed. And we have to do our best to, to, to empower the, the sort of the strategy and empower the intent that the developers are, are delivering on. And yes, we need to be, we need to be seeking every opportunity to, to lift that developer up and, and give them the tools sort of in the moment we wanna wrap the developer in armor, not wake them down with an anchor. And that's the, that's the thing that we, we want to keep striving towards is, is making that possible for the security team. >>So you guys are very relevant right now. APIs are the favorite environment for hackers was seeing that with breaches and in the headlines every day, I love this comprehensive approach, developer focused op security team enablement, operationally relevant to all, all, all parties. I have to ask you, how do you answer and, and talk about the competition, cuz with the rise of this trend, a lot of more people entering this market, how should a customer decide between no name and everyone else pitch in API security? What's the, is there nuances? Is there differences? How do you compare what's the differentiation? >>Yeah, I think, you know, the, the, the first thing to mention is that, you know, companies that are in the space of API security, we, we have a lot more in common. We probably have differences cause we're focused on the same problems, but there's, there's really two changes that we've made bringing to market an API platform. Number one is to look full lifecycle. So it used to be that you could buy, you know, DAST and SAS software testing tools, no name has API testing in, so, you know, for source code and for pipeline integrations along with then the runtime and posture management, which is really the production network. And so we really do think that we span east west a much broader set of controls for the API. And then the second characteristic is, is architectural fit. Particularly in a runtime production environment, you have to have a solution that does, does not create significant disruptions. >>It doesn't require agent deployment that can maximize the, the, the infrastructure that an organization already has. So we think our, you know, a big advantage for us in, in the production environment is that we can, we can adapt to the contour of the customer. We don't have to have the customer adapt to the contour of our architecture. So that flexibility really serves well, particularly with complex organizations, global organizations or those that have on, you know, data centers and, and, and public cloud and, and multiple varieties. So our ability to sort of adapt to a customer's architecture really makes us sort of like a universal tool for organizations. And we think that's really, you know, bears out in the, in the customers, in the large organizations and enterprises that have adapted us because we can adapt really any condition. >>Yeah. And that's great alignment too, from an execution consumption standpoint, it's gotta be fast with a developer. You gotta be frictionless as much as possible. Good stuff there. I have to ask you Carl, as, as you are a CISO chief information security officer, you know, your peers are out there. They're they're, they got, man there's so much going on around them. They gotta manage the current, protect the future and architect, the next level infrastructure for security. What do you, what do you see out there as a CSO with your peers in the marketplace? You know, practitioners, you know, evaluating companies, evaluating technologies, managing the threat landscape, unlimited surface area, evolving with the edge coming online, what's on their mind. How do you see it? What's your, what's your view there? What's your vision if you were, if you were in the hot seat in a big organization, I mean, obviously you're got a hot seat there with no name, but you're also, you know, you're seeing both sides of the coin at no name, you know, the CISO. So are they the frog and boiling water right now? Or like, like what's going on in their world right now? How would you describe the state of, of the CISO in cyber security? >>Yeah, there's, there's, there's two kind of tactical themes. I think almost every CISO shares the, the, the, the, the first tactical theme is, is I as a CISO. I probably know there's a technology out there to solve a little bit of every problem possible. Like, that's you objectively true. But what I don't wanna do is I don't wanna buy 75 technologies when I could buy 20 platforms or 12 that could solve that problem set. So the first thing I wanna do is as I, I want to communicate what we do from the perspective of, of like a single platform that does multiple things from source code testing, to posture and configuration to runtime defense, because I, a CISO's sensibilities is, is, is, is challenged by having 15 technologies. I really just want a couple to manage because it's complexity that we're managing when we're managing all these technologies. >>Even if something works for a point problem set, I, I don't want another technology to implement and manage. That's, that's just throwing money. Oftentimes at, at suboptimal, you know, we're not getting the results when we just throw tools at a problem. So the, that that platform concept is I think really appealing cuz every CSO is looking to consider, how do I reduce the number of technologies that I have? The second thing is every organization faces the challenge of talent. So what are, what are my options for talent, for mitigating? What is sort of, I, I can't hire enough qualified people at a remotely reasonable price to staff, what I'd like to. So I have to pursue both the utilizing third parties who have expertise in professional services that I can deploy to, to, to, to solve my problems, but also then to employing automation. So, you know, the, a great example would be if I have a team that has a, you know, a five person application security team, and now next year, my applications security or my, my applications team is gonna develop three times the number of, of applications and APIs. >>I can't scale my team by a factor of three, just to meet that demand. I have to pursue automation opportunities. And so we really want to measure the, the, the successes that we can achieve with automation so that a CISO can look at us as, as an answer to complexity rather than as a source of new complexity, because it is true that we're overwhelmed with the options at our disposal. Most of those options create more complexity than they solve for. And, and, you know, I pursue that in, in my practice, which is to, is to figure out how to sort of limit the complexity of what is already very complicated, you know, role and protecting an organization. >>Got it. And when you, when, when the CSO says Carl, what's in it for me with no name, what's the answer, what's the bumper bumper sticker. >>It, it's reducing complexity. It's making a very sophisticated problem. Set, simple to solve for APIs are a, are a class of assets that there's an answer for that answer includes automation and includes professional services. And we can, we can achieve a high degree of sophistication relatively speaking with a low amount of effort. When we look across our security team, this is a, this is a solvable problem space and, and we can do so pretty efficiently. >>Awesome. Well call, thank you so much for showcasing no name. And the last minute we have here, give a quick plug for the company, give a little stats, some factoids that people might be interested in. How big is the company? What are you guys doing enthusiastic about the solution? Share some, yep. Give the plug. >>Sure. We're, we're, we're a company of just about 300 employees now all across the globe, Asia Pacific, north America, Europe, and the middle east, you know, tremendous success with the release of our, of our software testing module, which we call active testing. We have such a variety of ways also to, to sort of test and take Nona for a test drive from sandboxes to POVs and, and some really amazing opportunities to, to show and tell and have the organizations diagnose quickly where, where they are. And so we, we love to, we love to, to, to show off the platform and, and let people take it for a test drive. So, you know, no name, security.com and any, anywhere in the world, you are, we can, we can deploy a, a, a sales engineer who can help show you the platform and, and show you all the things that, that we can, we can offer for the organization. >>Carl, great insight. Thank you again for sharing the stats and talk about the industry and really showcasing some of the key things you guys are doing in the industry for customers. We really appreciate it. Thanks for coming on. >>Thanks John. Appreciate it. >>Okay. That's the, this is the ADBU startup showcase. John fur, your host season two, episode four of this ongoing series covering the exciting new growing startups from the AWS ecosystem in cybersecurity. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
We just chatted with you at reinforce a business event. Good to see you again. You know, one of the hottest topics right now about APIs is, you know, because the, the security controls we employ from configuration management and asset As the API takes prominence in the organization, it goes from this sort of edge case of, I know the philosophy of the company is rooted in, is the API security exposures that are hitting the news almost every day. Why is APIs becoming more in the conversation for CSOs and companies to Well, take, take APIs that we had, you know, eight, 10 years ago, most of those Because, you know, some people will say, Hey, APIs are pretty straightforward. And so there we have, there's not the developer's fault. And so that's really where we have to marry the two of the runtime protection configuration management with So, so the, you know, they've gotten better, I'm over simplifying, the, you know, the, the first critical control is always know your assets and, and that we, the observability to the API inventory is to do it with the context also of the sense of the data That's always the first step, I have to ask you though, as a CSO, I mean, are the days of the monolithic application, where it's a single, you know, a single website with And I kind of compare that to the data center, this comparison, which is the monolithic application is now sort the same time, it's still out there and growing, I mean, the DevOps movement was essentially kind of are not, you know, presently conscious of it, but they're, And what do you guys So the API integrations with web application firewalls, How do you answer the quote, complication or risk to network and application changes? The, the first is, is for the developers. that allow the developers to test source code iterate through, on getting the developers, the self-service options with the security team, than, you know, putting another box in, in the network line. And the script has flipped. And the other part too, and, and talk about the competition, cuz with the rise of this trend, a lot of more people entering Yeah, I think, you know, the, the, the first thing to mention is that, you know, companies that are in the space So we think our, you know, a big advantage for us in, in the production environment is I have to ask you Carl, So the first thing I wanna do is as I, I want to communicate what we do from you know, the, a great example would be if I have a team that has a, you know, of limit the complexity of what is already very complicated, you know, role and protecting And when you, when, when the CSO says Carl, what's in it for me with no name, And we can, we can achieve a high degree of And the last minute we have here, Asia Pacific, north America, Europe, and the middle east, you know, some of the key things you guys are doing in the industry for customers. the AWS ecosystem in cybersecurity.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Karl Mattson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 platforms | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Carl Mattson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
60% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75 technologies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 technologies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kyle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Asia Pacific | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
north America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
25,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two changes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
five person | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 10,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 more people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 25,000 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 300 employees | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
second characteristic | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two kind | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
single platform | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
tonight | DATE | 0.97+ |
John fur | PERSON | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
single request | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one customer | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one code base | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
single website | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
today | DATE | 0.91+ |
first tactical theme | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
under three years | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
each organization | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
few years ago | DATE | 0.87+ |
John furrier | PERSON | 0.85+ |
thousand | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
step one | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
DAST | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
S2 E4 | EVENT | 0.79+ |
eight, 10 years ago | DATE | 0.78+ |
Showcase | EVENT | 0.77+ |
Number one | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
three sort | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
season two | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
three times | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
four | OTHER | 0.69+ |
ight | ORGANIZATION | 0.64+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
CISO | PERSON | 0.62+ |
Mohit Aron & Sanjay Poonen, Cohesity | Supercloud22
>>Hello. Welcome back to our super cloud 22 event. I'm John F host the cue with my co-host Dave ante. Extracting the signal from noise. We're proud to have two amazing cube alumnis here. We got Sanja Putin. Who's now the CEO of cohesive the emo Aaron who's the CTO. Co-founder also former CEO Cub alumni. The father of hyper-converged welcome back to the cube I endorsed the >>Cloud. Absolutely. Is the father. Great >>To see you guys. Thank thanks for coming on and perfect timing. The new job taking over that. The helm Mo it at cohesive big news, but part of super cloud, we wanna dig into it. Thanks for coming on. >>Thank you for having >>Us here. So first of all, we'll get into super before we get into the Supercloud. I want to just get the thoughts on the move Sanjay. We've been following your career since 2010. You've been a cube alumni from that point, we followed that your career. Why cohesive? Why now? >>Yeah, John David, thank you first and all for having us here, and it's great to be at your event. You know, when I left VMware last year, I took some time off just really primarily. I hadn't had a sabbatical in probably 18 years. I joined two boards, Phillips and sneak, and then, you know, started just invest and help entrepreneurs. Most of them were, you know, Indian Americans like me who were had great tech, were looking for the kind of go to market connections. And it was just a wonderful year to just de to unwind a bit. And along the, the way came CEO calls. And I'd asked myself, the question is the tech the best in the industry? Could you see value creation that was signi significant and you know, three, four months ago, Mohit and Carl Eschenbach and a few of the board members of cohesive called me and walk me through Mo's decision, which he'll talk about in a second. And we spent the last few months getting to know him, and he's everything you describe. He's not just the father of hyperconverge. And he wrote the Google file system, wicked smart, built a tech platform better than that second time. But we had to really kind of walk through the chemistry between us, which we did in long walks in, in, you know, discrete places so that people wouldn't find us in a Starbucks and start gossiping. So >>Why Sanjay? There you go. >>Actually, I should say it's a combination of two different decisions. The first one was to, for me to take a different role and I run the company as a CEO for, for nine years. And, you know, as a, as a technologist, I always like, you know, going deep into technology at the same time, the CEO duties require a lot of breadth, right? You're talking to customers, you're talking to partners, you're doing so much. And with the way we've been growing the with, you know, we've been fortunate, it was becoming hard to balance both. It's really also not fair to the company. Yeah. So I opted to do the depth job, you know, be the visionary, be the technologist. And that was the first decision to bring a CEO, a great CEO from outside. >>And I saw your video on the site. You said it was your decision. Yes. Go ahead. I have to ask you, cuz this is a real big transition for founders and you know, I have founder artists cuz everyone, you know, calls me that. But being the founder of a company, it's always hard to let go. I mean nine years as CEO, it's not like you had a, you had a great run. So this was it timing for you? Was it, was it a structural shift, like at super cloud, we're talking about a major shift that's happening right now in the industry. Was it a balance issue? Was it more if you wanted to get back in and in the tech >>Look, I, I also wanna answer, you know, why Sanja, but, but I'll address your question first. I always put the company first what's right for the company. Is it for me to start get stuck the co seat and try to juggle this depth and Brad simultaneously. I mean, I can stroke my ego a little bit there, but it's not good for the company. What's best for the company. You know, I'm a technologist. How about I oversee the technology part in partnership with so many great people I have in the company and I bring someone kick ass to be the CEO. And so then that was the second decision. Why Sanja when Sanjay, you know, is a very well known figure. He's managed billions of dollars of business in VMware. You know, been there, done that has, you know, some of the biggest, you know, people in the industry on his speed dial, you know, we were really fortunate to have someone like that, come in and accept the role of the CEO of cohesive. I think we can take the company to new Heights and I'm looking forward to my partnership with, with Sanja on this. >>It it's we, we called it the splash brothers and >>The, >>In the vernacular. It doesn't matter who gets the ball, whether it's step clay, we shoot. And I think if you look at some of the great partnerships, whether it was gates bomber, there, plenty of history of this, where a founder and a someone who was, it has to be complimentary skills. If I was a technologist myself and wanted to code we'd clash. Yeah. But I think this was really a match me in heaven because he, he can, I want him to keep innovating and building the best platform for today in the future. And our customers tell one customer told me, this is the best tech they've seen since VMware, 20 years ago, AWS, 10 years ago. And most recently this was a global 100 big customers. So I feel like this combination, now we have to show that it works. It's, you know, it's been three, four months. My getting to know him, you know, I'm day eight on the job, but I'm loving it. >>Well, it's a sluman model too. It's more modern example. You saw, he did it with Fred Ludy at service now. Yes. And, and of course at, at snowflake, yeah. And his book, you read his book. I dunno if you've read his book, amp it up, but app it up. And he says, I always you'll love this. Give great deference to the founder. Always show great respect. Right. And for good reason. So >>In fact, I mean you could talk to him, you actually met to >>Frank. I actually, you know, a month or so back, I actually had dinner with him in his ranch in Moana. And I posed the question. There was a number of CEOs that went there and I posed him the question. So Frank, you know, many of us, we grow being deaf guys, you know? And eventually when we take on the home of our CEO, we have to do breadth. How do you do it? And he's like, well, let me tell you, I was never a death guy. I'm a breath guy. >>I'm like, >>That's my answer. Yeah. >>So, so I >>Want the short story. So the day I got the job, I, I got a text from Frank and I said, what's your advice the first time CEO, three words, amp it up, >>Amp it up. Right? Yeah. >>And so you're always on brand, man. >>So you're an amazing operator. You've proven that time and time again at SAP, VMware, et cetera, you feel like now you, you, you wanna do both of those skills. You got the board and you got the operations cuz you look, you know, look at sloop when he's got Scarelli wherever he goes, he brings Scarelli with him as sort of the operator. How, how do you, how are you thinking >>About that? I mean it's early days, but yeah. Yeah. Small. I mean I've, you know, when I was, you know, it was 35,000 people at VMware, 80, 90,000 people at SAP, a really good run. The SAP run was 10 to 20 billion innovative products, especially in analytics and VMware six to 12 end user computing cloud. So I learned a lot. I think the company, you know, being about 2000 employees plus not to mayor tomorrow, but over the course next year I can meet everybody. Right? So first off the executive team, 10 of us, we're, we're building more and more cohesiveness if I could use that word between us, which is great, the next, you know, layers of VPs and every manager, I think that's possible. So I I'm a people person and a customer person. So I think when you take that sort of extroverted mindset, we'll bring energy to the workforce to, to retain the best and then recruit the best. >>And you know, even just the week we, we were announced that this announcement happened. Our website traffic went through the roof, the highest it's ever been, lots of resumes coming in. So, and then lots of customer engagement. So I think we'll take this, but I, I feel very good about the possibilities, because see, for me, I didn't wanna walk into the company to a company where the technology risk was high. Okay. I feel like that I can go to bed at night and the technology risk is low. This guy's gonna run a machine at the current and the future. And I'm hearing that from customers. Now, what I gotta do is get the, the amp it up part on the go to market. I know a little thing or too about >>That. You've got that down. I think the partnership is really key here. And again, nine use the CEO and then Sanja points to our super cloud trend that we've been looking at, which is there's another wave happening. There's a structural change in real time happening now, cloud one was done. We saw that transition, AWS cloud native now cloud native with an kind of operating system kind of vibe going on with on-premise hybrid edge. People say multi-cloud, but we're looking at this as an opportunity for companies like cohesive to go to the next level. So I gotta ask you guys, what do you see as structural change right now in the industry? That's disruptive. People are using cloud and scale and data to refactor their business models, change modern cases with cloud native. How are you guys looking at this next structural change that's happening right now? Yeah, >>I'll take that. So, so I'll start by saying that. Number one, data is the new oil and number two data is exploding, right? Every year data just grows like crazy managing data is becoming harder and harder. You mentioned some of those, right? There's so many cloud options available. Cloud one different vendors have different clouds. There is still on-prem there's edge infrastructure. And the number one problem that happens is our data is getting fragmented all over the place and managing so many fragments of data is getting harder and harder even within a cloud or within on-prem or within edge data is fragmented. Right? Number two, I think the hackers out there have realized that, you know, to make money, it's no longer necessary to Rob banks. They can actually see steal the data. So ransomware attacks on the rise it's become a boardroom level discussion. They say there's a ransomware attack happening every 11 seconds or so. Right? So protecting your data has become very important security data. Security has become very important. Compliance is important, right? So people are looking for data management solutions, the next gen data management platform that can really provide all this stuff. And that's what cohesive is about. >>What's the difference between data management and backup. Explain that >>Backup is just an entry point. That's one use case. I wanna draw an analogy. Let's draw an analogy to my former company, Google right? Google started by doing Google search, but is Google really just a search engine. They've built a platform that can do multiple things. You know, they might have started with search, but then they went down to roll out Google maps and Gmail and YouTube and so many other things on that platform. So similarly backups might be just the first use case, but it's really about that platform on which you can do more with the data that's next gen data management. >>But, but you am, I correct. You don't consider yourself a security company. One of your competitors is actually pivoting and in positioning themselves as a security company, I've always felt like data management, backup and recovery data protection is an adjacency to security, but those two worlds are coming together. How do you see >>It? Yeah. The way I see it is that security is part of data management. You start maybe by backing with data, but then you secure it and then you do more with that data. If you're only doing security, then you're just securing the data. You, you gotta do more with the data. So data management is much bigger. So >>It's a security is a subset of data. I mean, there you go. Big TA Sanjay. >>Well, I mean I've, and I, I, I I'd agree. And I actually, we don't get into that debate. You know, I've told the company, listen, we'll figure that out. Cuz who cares about the positioning at the bottom? My email, I say we are data management and data security company. Okay. Now what's the best word that describes three nouns, which I think we're gonna do management security and analytics. Okay. He showed me a beautiful diagram, went to his home in the course of one of these, you know, discrete conversations. And this was, I mean, he's done this before. Many, if you watch on YouTube, he showed me a picture of an ice big iceberg. And he said, listen, you know, if you look at companies like snowflake and data bricks, they're doing the management security and mostly analytics of data. That's the top of the iceberg, the stuff you see. >>But a lot of the stuff that's get backed archive is the bottom of the iceberg that you don't see. And you try to, if you try to ask a question on age data, the it guy will say, get a ticket. I'll come back with three days. I'll UNIV the data rehydrate and then you'll put it into a database. And you can think now imagine that you could do live searches analytics on, on age data that's analytics. So I think the management, the security, the analytics of, you know, if you wanna call it secondary data or backed up data or data, that's not hot and live warm, colder is a huge opportunity. Now, what do you wanna call one phrase that describes all of it. Do you call that superpower management security? Okay, whatever you wanna call it. I view it as saying, listen, let's build a platform. >>Some people call Google, a search company. People, some people call Google and information company and we just have to go and pursue every CIO and every CSO that has a management and a security and do course analytics problem. And that's what we're doing. And when I talk to the, you know, I didn't talk to all the 3000 customers, but the biggest customers and I was doing diligence. They're like this thing has got enormous potential. Okay. And we just have to now go focus, get every fortune 1000 company to pick us because this problem, even the first use case you talk back up is a little bit like, you know, razor blades and soap you've needed. You needed it 30 years ago and you'll need it for 30 years. It's just that the tools that were built in the last generation that were companies formed in 1990s, one of them I worked for years ago are aids are not built for the cloud. So I think this is a tremendous opportunity where many of those, those, those nos management security analytics will become part of what we do. And we'll come up with the right phrase for what the companies and do course >>Sanjay. So ma and Sanja. So given that given that's this Google transition, I like that example search was a data problem. They got sequenced to a broader market opportunity. What super cloud we trying to tease out is what does that change over from a data standpoint, cuz now the operating environments change has become more complex and the enterprises are savvy. Developers are savvy. Now they want, they want SAS solutions. They want freemium and expanding. They're gonna drive the operations agenda with DevOps. So what is the complexity that needs to be abstracted away? How do you see that moment? Because this is what people are talking about. They're saying security's built in, driven by developers. Developers are driving operations behavior. So what is the shift? Where do you guys see this new? Yeah. Expansive for cohesive. How do you fit into super cloud? >>So let me build up from that entry point. Maybe back up to what you're saying is the super cloud, right? Let me draw that journey. So let's say the legacy players are just doing backups. How, how sad is it that you have one silo sitting there just for peace of mind as an insurance policy and you do nothing with the data. If you have to do something with the data, you have to build another silo, you have to build another copy. You have to manage it separately. Right. So clearly that's a little bit brain damaged. Right. So, okay. So now you take a little bit of, you know, newer vendors who may take that backup platform and do a little bit more with that. Maybe they provide security, but your problem still remains. How do you do more with the data? How do you do some analytics? >>Like he's saying, right. How do you test development on that? How do you migrate the data to the cloud? How do you manage it? The data at scale? How do you do you provide a unified experience across, across multiple cloud, which you're calling the super cloud. That's where cohesive goes. So what we do, we provide a platform, right? We have tentacles in on-prem in each of the clouds. And on top of that, it looks like one platform that you manage. We have a single control plane, a UI. If you may, a single pin of glass, if, if you may, that our customers can use to manage all of it. And now it looks, starts looking like one platform. You mentioned Google, do you, when you go to, you know, kind Google search or a URL, do you really care? What happens behind the scenes mean behind the scenes? Google's built a platform that spans the whole world. No, >>But it's interesting. What's behind the scenes. It's a beautiful now. And I would say, listen, one other thing to pull on Dave, on the security part, I saw a lot of vendors this day in this space, white washing a security message on top of backup. Okay. And CSO, see through that, they'll offer warranties and guarantees or whatever, have you of X million dollars with a lot of caveats, which will never paid because it's like escape clause here. We won't pay it. Yeah. And, and what people really want is a scalable solution that works. And you know, we can match every warranty that's easy. And what I heard was this was the most scalable solution at scale. And that's why you have to approach this with a Google type mindset. I love the fact that every time you listen to sun pitch, I would, what, what I like about him, the most common word to use is scale. >>We do things at scale. So I found that him and AUR and some of the early Google people who come into the company had thought about scale. And, and even me it's like day eight. I found even the non-tech pieces of it. The processes that, you know, these guys are built for simple things in some cases were better than some of the things I saw are bigger companies I'd been used to. So we just have to continue, you know, building a scale platform with the enterprise. And then our cloud product is gonna be the simple solution for the masses. And my view of the world is there's 5,000 big companies and 5 million small companies we'll push the 5 million small companies as the cloud. Okay. Amazon's an investor in the company. AWS is a big partner. We'll talk about I'm sure knowing John's interest in that area, but that's a cloud play and that's gonna go to the cloud really fast. You not build you're in the marketplace, you're in the marketplace. I mean, maybe talk about the history of the Amazon relationship investing and all that. >>Yeah, absolutely. So in two years back late 2020, we, you know, in collaboration with AWS who also by the way is an investor now. And in cohesive, we rolled out what we call data management as a service. It's our SaaS service where we run our software in the cloud. And literally all customers have to do is just go there and sign on, right? They don't have to manage any infrastructure and stuff. What's nice is they can then combine that with, you know, software that they might have bought from cohesive. And it still looks like one platform. So what I'm trying to say is that they get a choice of the, of the way they wanna consume our software. They can consume it as a SAS service in the cloud. They can buy our software, manage it themselves, offload it to a partner on premises or what have you. But it still looks like that one platform, what you're calling a Supercloud >>Yeah. And developers are saying, they want the bag of Legos to compose their solutions. That's the Nirvana they want to get there. So that's, it has to look the same. >>Well, what is it? What we're calling a Superlo can we, can we test that for a second? So data management and service could span AWS and on-prem with the identical experience. So I guess I would call that a Supercloud I presume it's not gonna through AWS span multiple clouds, but, but >>Why not? >>Well, well interesting cuz we had this, I mean, so, okay. So we could in the future, it doesn't today. Well, >>David enough kind of pause for a second. Everything that we do there, if we do it will be customer driven. So there might be some customers I'll give you one Walmart that may want to store the data in a non AWS cloud risk cuz they're competitors. Right. So, but the control plane could still be in, in, in the way we built it, but the data might be stored somewhere else. >>What about, what about a on-prem customer? Who says, Hey, I, I like cohesive. I've now got multiple clouds. I want the identical experience across clouds. Yeah. Okay. So, so can you do that today? How do you do that today? Can we talk >>About that? Yeah. So basically think roughly about the split between the data plane and the control plane, the data plane is, you know, our cohesive clusters that could be sitting on premises that could be sitting in multiple data centers or you can run an instance of that cluster in the cloud, whichever cloud you choose. Right. That's what he was referring to as the data plane. So collectively all these clusters from the data plane, right? They stored the data, but it can all be managed using the control plane. So you still get that single image, the single experience across all clouds. And by the way, the, the, the, the cloud vendor does actually benefit because here's a customer. He mentioned a customer that may not wanna go to AWS, but when they get the data plane on a different cloud, whether it's Azure, whether it's the Google cloud, they then get data management services. Maybe they're able to replicate the data over to AWS. So AWS also gains. >>And your deployment model is you instantiate the cohesive stack on each of the regions and clouds, is that correct? And you building essentially, >>It all happens behind the scenes. That's right. You know, just like Google probably has their tentacles all over the world. We will instantiate and then make it all look like one platform. >>I mean, you should really think it's like a human body, right? The control planes, the head. Okay. And that controls everything. The data plane is large because it's a lot of the data, right? It's the rest of the body, that data plane could be wherever you want it to be. Traditionally, the part the old days was tape. Then you got disk. Now you got multiple clouds. So that's the way we think about it. And there on that piece of it will be neutral, right? We should be multi-cloud to the data plane being every single place. Cause it's customer demand. Where do you want your store data? Air gapped. On-prem no problem. We'll work with Dell. Okay. You wanna be in a particular cloud, AWS we'll work then optimized with S3 and glacier. So this is where I think the, the path to a multi-cloud or Supercloud is to be customer driven, but the control plane sits in Amazon. So >>We're blessed to have a number of, you know, technical geniuses in here. So earlier we were speaking to Ben wa deja VI, and what they do is different. They don't instantiate an individual, you know, regions. What they do is of a single global. Is there a, is there an advantage of doing it the way the cohesive does it in terms of simplicity or how do you see that? Is that a future direction for you from a technology standpoint? What are the trade offs there? >>So you want to be where the data is when you said single global, I take it that they run somewhere and the data has to go there. And in this day age, correct >>Said that. He said, you gotta move that in this >>Day and >>Age query that's, you know, across regions, look >>In this day and age with the way the data is growing, the way it is, it's hard to move around the data. It's much easier to move around the competition. And in these instances, what have you, so let the data be where it is and you manage it right there. >>So that's the advantage of instantiating in multiple regions. As you don't have to move the >>Data cost, we have the philosophy we call it. Let's bring the, the computation to the data rather than the data to >>The competition and the same security model, same governance model, same. How do you, how do you federate that? >>So it's all based on policies. You know, this overarching platform controlled by, by the control plane, you just, our customers just put in the policies and then the underlying nuts and bolts just take care >>Of, you know, it's when I first heard and start, I started watching some of his old videos, ACE really like hyperconverged brought to secondary storage. In fact, he said, oh yeah, that's great. You got it. Because I first called this idea, hyperconverged secondary storage, because the idea of him inventing hyperconverge was bringing compute to storage. It had never been done. I mean, you had the kind of big VC stuff, but these guys were the first to bring that hyperconverge at, at Nutanix. So I think this is that same idea of bringing computer storage, but now applied not to the warm data, but to the rest of the data, including a >>Lot of, what about developers? What's, what's your relationship with developers? >>Maybe you talk about the marketplace and everything >>He's yeah. And I'm, I'm curious as to do you have a PAs layer, what we call super PAs layer to create an identical developer experience across your Supercloud. I'm gonna my >>Term. So we want our customers not just to benefit from the software that we write. We also want them to benefit from, you know, software that's written by developers by third party people and so on and so forth. So we also support a marketplace on the platform where you can download apps from third party developers and run them on this platform. There's a, a number of successful apps. There's one, you know, look like I said, our entry point might be backups, but even when backups, we don't do everything. Look, for instance, we don't backup mainframes. There is a, a company we partner with, you know, and their software can run in our marketplace. And it's actually used by many, many of our financial customers. So our customers don't get, just get the benefit of what we build, but they also get the benefit of what third parties build. Another analogy I like to draw. You can tell. And front of analogy is I drew an analogy to hyperscale is like Google. Yeah. The second analogy I like to draw is that to a simple smartphone, right? A smartphone starts off by being a great phone. But beyond that, it's also a GPS player. It's a, it's a, it's a music player. It's a camera, it's a flashlight. And it also has a marketplace from where you can download apps and extend the power of that platform. >>Is that a, can we think of that as a PAs layer or no? Is it really not? You can, okay. You can say, is it purpose built for what you're the problem that you're trying to solve? >>So we, we just built APIs. Yeah. Right. We have an SDK that developers can use. And through those APIs, they get to leverage the underlying services that exist on the platform. And now developers can use that to take advantage of all that stuff. >>And it was, that was a key factor for me too. Cause I, what I, you know, I've studied all the six, seven players that sort of so-called leaders. Nobody had a developer ecosystem, nobody. Right? The old folks were built for the hardware era, but anyones were built for the cloud to it didn't have any partners were building on their platform. So I felt for me listen, and that the example of, you know, model nine rights, the name of the company that does back up. So there's, there's companies that are built on and there's a number of others. So our goal is to have a big tent, David, to everybody in the ecosystem to partner with us, to build on this platform. And, and that may take over time, but that's the way we're build >>It. And you have a metadata layer too, that has the intelligence >>To correct. It's all abstract. That that's right. So it's a combination of data and metadata. We have lots of metadata that keeps track of where the data is. You know, it allows you to index the data you can do quick searches. You can actually, you, we talking about the control plan from that >>Tracing, >>You can inject a search that'll through search throughout your multi-cloud environment, right? The super cloud that you call it. We have all that, all that goodness sounds >>Like a Supercloud John. >>Yeah. I mean, data tracing involved can trace the data lineage. >>You, you can trace the data lineage. So we, you know, provide, you know, compliance and stuff. So you can, >>All right. So my final question to wrap up, we guys, first of all, thanks for coming on. I know you're super busy, San Jose. We, we know what you're gonna do. You're gonna amp it up and, you know, knock all your numbers out. Think you always do. But what I'm interested in, what you're gonna jump into, cuz now you're gonna have the creative license to jump in to the product, the platform there has to be the next level in your mind. Can you share your thoughts on where this goes next? Love the control plane, separate out from the data plane. I think that plays well for super. How >>Much time do you have John? This guy's got, he's got a wealth. Ditis keep >>Going. Mark. Give us the most important thing you're gonna focus on. That kind of brings the super cloud and vision together. >>Yeah. Right away. I'm gonna, perhaps I, I can ion into two things. The first one is I like to call it building the, the machine, the system, right. Just to draw an analogy. Look, I draw an analogy to the us traffic system. People from all walks of life, rich, poor Democrats, Republicans, you know, different states. They all work in the, the traffic system and we drive well, right. It's a system that just works. Whereas in some other countries, you know, the system doesn't work. >>We know, >>We know a few of those. >>It's not about works. It's not about the people. It's the same people who would go from here to those countries and, and not dry. Well, so it's all about the system. So the first thing I, I have my sights on is to really strengthen the system that we have in our research development to make it a machine. I mean, it functions quite well even today, but wanna take it to the next level. Right. So that I wanna get to a point where innovation just happens in the grassroots. And it just, just like >>We automations scale optic brings all, >>Just happens without anyone overseeing it. Anyone there's no single point of bottleneck. I don't have to go take any diving catches or have you, there are people just working, you know, in a decentralized fashion and innovation just happens. Yeah. The second thing I work on of course is, you know, my heart and soul is in, you know, driving the vision, you know, the next level. And that of course is part of it. So those are the two things >>We heard from all day in our super cloud event that there's a need for an, an operating system. Yeah. Whether that's defacto standard or open. Correct. Do you see a consortium around the corner potentially to bring people together so that things could work together? Cuz there really isn't no stand there. Isn't a standards bodies. Now we have great hyperscale growth. We have on-prem we got the super cloud thing happening >>And it's a, it's kind of like what is an operating system? Operating system exposes some APIs that the applications can then use. And if you think about what we've been trying to do with the marketplace, right, we've built a huge platform and that platform is exposed through APIs. That third party developers can use. Right? And even we, when we, you know, built more and more services on top, you know, we rolled our D as we rolled out, backup as a service and a ready for thing security as a service governance, as a service, they're using those APIs. So we are building a distributor, putting systems of sorts. >>Well, congratulations on a great journey. Sanja. Congratulations on taking the hem. Thank you've got ball control. Now you're gonna be calling the ball cohesive as they say, it's, >>It's a team. It's, you know, I think I like that African phrase. If you want to go fast, you go alone. If you wanna go far, you go together. So I've always operated with the best deal. I'm so fortunate. This is to me like a dream come true because I always thought I wanted to work with a technologist that frees me up to do what I like. I mean, I started as an engineer, but that's not what I am today. Right? Yeah. So I do understand the product and this category I think is right for disruption. So I feel excited, you know, it's changing growing. Yeah. No. And it's a, it requires innovation with a cloud scale mindset and you guys have been great friends through the years. >>We'll be, we'll be watching you. >>I think it's not only disruption. It's creation. Yeah. There's a lot of white space that just hasn't been created yet. >>You're gonna have to, and you know, the proof, isn't the pudding. Yeah. You already have five of the biggest 10 financial institutions in the us and our customers. 25% of the fortune 500 users, us two of the biggest five pharmaceutical companies in the world use us. Probably, you know, some of the biggest companies, you know, the cars you have, you know, out there probably are customers. So it's already happening. >>I know you got an IPO filed confidentially. I know you can't talk numbers, but I can tell by your confidence, you're feeling good right now we are >>Feeling >>Good. Yeah. One day, one week, one month at a time. I mean, you just, you know, I like the, you know, Jeff Bezos, Andy jazzy expression, which is, it's always day one, you know, just because you've had success, even, you know, if, if a and when an IPO O makes sense, you just have to stay humble and hungry because you realize, okay, we've had a lot of success in the fortune 1000, but there's a lot of white space that hasn't picked USS yet. So let's go, yeah, there's lots of midmarket account >>Product opportunities are still, >>You know, I just stay humble and hungry and if you've got the team and then, you know, I'm really gonna be working also in the ecosystem. I think there's a lot of very good partners. So lots of ideas brew through >>The head. Okay. Well, thank you so much for coming on our super cloud event and, and, and also doubling up on the news of the new appointment and congratulations on the success guys. Coverage super cloud 22, I'm sure. Dave ante, thanks for watching. Stay tuned for more segments after this break.
SUMMARY :
Who's now the CEO of cohesive the emo Aaron who's the CTO. Is the father. To see you guys. So first of all, we'll get into super before we get into the Supercloud. Most of them were, you know, There you go. So I opted to do the depth job, you know, be the visionary, cuz this is a real big transition for founders and you know, I have founder artists cuz everyone, some of the biggest, you know, people in the industry on his speed dial, you And I think if you look at And his book, you read his book. So Frank, you know, many of us, we grow being Yeah. So the day I got the job, I, I got a text from Frank and I said, Yeah. You got the board and you got the operations cuz you look, you know, look at sloop when he's got Scarelli wherever he goes, I think the company, you know, being about 2000 employees And you know, even just the week we, we were announced that this announcement happened. So I gotta ask you guys, what do you see as structural change right now in the industry? Number two, I think the hackers out there have realized that, you know, What's the difference between data management and backup. just the first use case, but it's really about that platform on which you can How do you see You start maybe by backing with data, but then you secure it and then you do more with that data. I mean, there you go. And he said, listen, you know, if you look at companies like snowflake and data bricks, the analytics of, you know, if you wanna call it secondary data or backed up data or data, you know, I didn't talk to all the 3000 customers, but the biggest customers and I was doing diligence. How do you see that moment? So now you take a little bit of, And on top of that, it looks like one platform that you I love the fact that every time you have to continue, you know, building a scale platform with the enterprise. we, you know, in collaboration with AWS who also by the way is an investor So that's, it has to look the same. So I guess I would call that a Supercloud So we could in the future, So there might be some customers I'll give you one Walmart that may want to store the data in a non How do you do that today? the data plane is, you know, our cohesive clusters that could be sitting on premises that could be sitting It all happens behind the scenes. So that's the way we think about it. We're blessed to have a number of, you know, technical geniuses in here. So you want to be where the data is when you said single global, He said, you gotta move that in this so let the data be where it is and you manage it right there. So that's the advantage of instantiating in multiple regions. to the data rather than the data to The competition and the same security model, same governance model, same. by the control plane, you just, our customers just put in the policies and then the underlying nuts and bolts just I mean, you had the kind of big VC stuff, but these guys were the first to bring layer to create an identical developer experience across your Supercloud. So we also support a marketplace on the platform where you can download apps from Is that a, can we think of that as a PAs layer or no? And through those APIs, they get to leverage the underlying services that So I felt for me listen, and that the example of, you know, model nine rights, You know, it allows you to index the data you can do quick searches. The super cloud that you call it. So we, you know, provide, you know, compliance and stuff. You're gonna amp it up and, you know, knock all your numbers out. Much time do you have John? That kind of brings the super cloud and vision together. you know, the system doesn't work. I have my sights on is to really strengthen the system that we have in our research you know, driving the vision, you know, the next level. Do you see a consortium around the corner potentially to bring people together so that things could work together? And even we, when we, you know, built more and more services on top, you know, Congratulations on taking the hem. So I feel excited, you know, it's changing growing. I think it's not only disruption. Probably, you know, some of the biggest companies, you know, the cars you have, you know, I know you can't talk numbers, but I can tell by your confidence, I mean, you just, you know, I like the, you know, you know, I'm really gonna be working also in the ecosystem. the news of the new appointment and congratulations on the success guys.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Aaron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sanjay Poonen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sanja Putin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1990s | DATE | 0.99+ |
Carl Eschenbach | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brad | PERSON | 0.99+ |
nine years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Walmart | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Scarelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Moana | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Jose | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
25% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John F | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mohit | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanja | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sanja | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Fred Ludy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
35,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Starbucks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AUR | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
18 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mohit Aron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
four months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | DATE | 0.99+ |
one platform | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
30 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Mo | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Mark | PERSON | 0.98+ |
One day | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second analogy | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Cub | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Karl Mattson, Noname Security | AWS re:Inforce 2022
>>Hello, Ron. Welcome to AWS reinforce here. Live in Boston, Massachusetts. I'm John feer, host of the cube. We're here at Carl Matson. CSO at no name security. That's right, no name security, no name securities, also a featured partner at season two, episode four of our upcoming eightish startup showcase security themed event happening in the end of August. Look for that at this URL, AWS startups.com, but we're here at reinforc Carl. Thanks for joining me today. Good to see >>You. Thank you for having us, John. >>So this show security, it's not as packed as the eight of us summit was in New York. That just happened two weeks ago, 19,000 people here, more focused crowd. Lot at stake operations are under pressure. The security teams are under a lot of pressure as apps drive more and more cloud native goodness. As we say, the gen outta the bottle, people want more cloud native apps. Absolutely. That's put a lot of pressure on the ops teams and the security teams. That's the core theme here. How do you see it happening? How do you see this unfolding? Do you agree with that? And how would you describe today's event? >>Well, I think you're, you're spot on. I think the, the future of it is increasingly becoming the story of developers and APIs becoming the hero, the hero of digital transformation, the hero of public cloud adoption. And so this is really becoming much more of a developer-centric discussion about where we're moving our applications and, and where they're hosted, but also how they're designed. And so there's a lot of energy around that right now around focusing security capabilities that really appeal to the sensibilities and the needs of, of modern applications. >>I want to get to know name security a second, and let you explain what you guys do. Then I'll have a few good questions for you to kind of unpack that. But the thing about the structural change that's happened with cloud computing is kind of, and kind of in the past now, DevOps cloud scale, large scale data, the rise of the super cloud companies like snowflake capital, one there's examples of companies that don't even have CapEx investments building on the cloud. And in a way, our, the success of DevOps has created another sea of problems and opportunities that is more complexity as the benefits of DevOps and open source, continue to rise, agile applications that have value can be quantified. There's no doubt with the pandemic that's value there. Yeah. Now you have the collateral damage of success, a new opportunity to abstract away, more complexity to go to the next level. Yep. This is a big industry thing. What are the key opportunities and areas as this new environment, cuz that's the structural change happening now? Yep. What's the key dynamics right now. That's driving this new innovation and what are some of those problem areas that are gonna be abstracted away that you see? >>Well, the, the first thing I I'd suggest is is to, to lean into those structural changes and take advantage of them where they become an advantage for governance, security risk. A perfect example is automation. So what we have in microservices, applications and cloud infrastructures and new workloads like snowflake is we have workloads that want to talk, they want to be interoperated with. And because of that, we can develop new capabilities that take advantage of those of those capabilities. And, and so we want to have on our, on our security teams in particular is we wanna have the talent and the tools that are leaning into and capitalizing on exactly those strengths of, of the underlying capabilities that you're securing rather than to counter that trend, that the, the security professional needs to get ahead of it and, and be a part of that discussion with the developers and the infrastructure teams. >>And, and again, the tructure exchange could kill you too as well. I mean, some benefits, you know, data's the new oil, but end of the day it could be a problematic thing. Sure. All right. So let's get that. No names talk about the company. What you guys do, you have an interesting approach, heavily funded, good success, good buzz. What's going on with the company? Give the quick overview. >>Well, we're a company that's just under three years old and, and what APIs go back, of course, a, a decade or more. We've all been using APIs for a long time, but what's really shifted over the last couple of years is the, is the transition of, of applications and especially business critical processes to now writing on top of public facing APIs where API used to be the behind the scenes interconnection between systems. Now those APIs are exposed to their public facing. And so what we focus on as a company is looking at that API as a, as a software endpoint, just like any other endpoint in our environments that we're historically used to. That's an endpoint that needs full life cycle protection. It needs to be designed well secure coding standards for, for APIs and tested. Well, it also has to be deployed into production configured well and operated well. And when there's a misuse or an attack in progress, we have to be able to protect and identify the, the risks to that API in production. So when you add that up, we're looking at a full life cycle view of the API, and it's really it's about time because the API is not new yet. We're just starting to now to apply like actual discipline and, and practices that help keep that API secure. >>Yeah. It's interesting. It's like what I was saying earlier. They're not going anywhere. They're not going, they're the underpinning, the underlying benefit of cloud yes. Cloud native. So it's just more, more operational stability, scale growth. What are some of the challenges that, that are there and what do you guys do particularly to solve it? You're protecting it. Are you scaling it? What specifically are you guys addressing? >>But sure. So I think API security, even as a, as a discipline is not new, but I think the, the, the traditional look at API security looks only at, at the quality of the source code. Certainly quality of the source code of API is, is sort of step one. But what we see in, in practices is most of the publicly known API compromises, they weren't because of bad source code that they because of network misconfiguration or the misapplication of policy during runtime. So a great example of that would be developer designs, an API designs. It in such a way that Gar that, that enforces authentication to be well designed and strong. And then in production, those authentication policies are not applied at a gateway. So what we add to the, we add to the, to the conversation on API security is helping fill all those little gaps from design and testing through production. So we can see all of the moving parts in the, the context of the API to see how it can be exploited and, and how we can reduce risk in independent of. >>So this is really about hardening the infrastructure yep. Around cuz the developer did their job in that example. Yep. So academic API is well formed working, but something didn't happen on the network or gateway box or app, you know, some sort of network configuration or middleware configuration. >>Absolutely. So in our, in our platform, we, we essentially have sort of three functional areas. There's API code testing, and then we call next is posture management posture. Management's a real thing. If we're talking about a laptop we're talking about, is it up to date with patches? Is it configured? Well, is it secure network connectivity? The same is true with APIs. They have to be managed and cared for by somebody who's looking at their posture on the network. And then of course then there's threat defense and run time protection. So that posture management piece, that's really a new entrant into the discussion on API security. And that's really where we started as a company is focusing on that sort of acute gap of information, >>Posture, protection, >>Posture, and protection. Absolutely >>Define that. What does that, what does posture posture protection mean? How would you define that? >>Sure. I think it's a, it's identifying the inherent risk exposure of an API. Great example of that would be an API that is addressable by internal systems and external systems at the same time. Almost always. That is, that is an error. It's a mistake that's been made so well by, by identifying that misconfiguration of posture, then we can, we can protect that API by restricting the internet connectivity externally. That's just a great example of posture. We see almost every organization has that and it's never intended. >>Great, great, great call out. Thanks for sharing. All right, so I'm a customer. Yep. Okay. Look at, Hey, I already got an app firewall API gateway. Why do I need another tool? >>Well, first of all, web application firewalls are sort of essential parts of a security ecosystem. An API management gateway is usually the brain of an API economy. What we do is we, we augment those platforms with what they don't do well and also when they're not used. So for example, in, in any environment, we, we aspire to have all of our applications or APIs protected by web application firewall. First question is, are they even behind the web? Are they behind the w at all? We're gonna find that the WAFF doesn't know if it's not protecting something. And then secondary, there are attack types of business logic in particular of like authentication policy that a WAFF is not gonna be able to see. So the WAFF and the API management plan, those are the key control points and we can help make those better. >>You know what I think is cool, Carl, as you're bringing up a point that we're seeing here and we've seen before, but now it's kind of coming at the visibility. And it was mentioned in the keynote by one of the presenters, Kurt, I think it was who runs the platform. This idea of reasoning is coming into security. So the idea of knowing the topology know that there's dynamic stuff going on. I mean, topes aren't static anymore. Yep. And now you have more microservices. Yep. More APIs being turned on and off this runtime is interesting. So you starting to see this holistic view of, Hey, the secret sauce is you gotta be smarter. Yep. And that's either machine learning or AI. So, so how does that relate to what you guys do? Does it, cuz it sounds like you've got something of that going on with the product. Is that fair or yeah. >>Yeah, absolutely. So we, yeah, we talked about posture, so that's, that's really the inherent quality or secure posture of a, of an API. And now let's talk about sending traffic through that API, the request and response. When we're talking about organizations that have more APIs than they have people, employees, or, or tens of thousands, we're seeing in some customers, the only way to identify anomalous traffic is through machine learning. So we apply a machine learning model to each and every API in independently for itself because we wanna learn how that API is supposed to be behave. Where is it supposed to be talking? What kind of data is it supposed to be trafficking in, in, in all its facets. So we can model that activity and then identify the anomaly where there's a misuse, there's an attacker event. There's an, an insider employee is doing something with that API that's different. And that's really key with APIs is, is that no, a no two APIs are alike. Yeah. They really do have to be modeled individually rather than I can't share my, my threat signatures for my API, with your organization, cuz your APIs are different. And so we have to have that machine learning approach in order to really identify that >>Anomaly and watch the credentials, permissions. Absolutely all those things. All right. Take me through the life cycle of an API. There's pre-production postproduction what do I need to know about those two, those two areas with respect to what you guys do? >>Sure. So the pre-production activities are really putting in the hands of a developer or an APSEC team. The ability to test that API during its development and, and source code testing is one piece, but also in pre-production are we modeling production variables enough to know what's gonna happen when I move it into production? So it's one thing to have secure source code, of course, but then it's also, do we know how that API's gonna interact with the world once it's sort of set free? So the testing capabilities early life cycle is really how we de-risk in the long term, but we all have API ecosystems that are existing. And so in production we're applying the, all of those same testing of posture and configuration issues in runtime, but really what it, it may sound cliche to say, we wanna shift security left, but in APIs that's, that's a hundred percent true. We want to keep moving our, our issue detection to the earliest possible point in the development of an API. And that gives us the greatest return in the API, which is what we're all looking for is to capitalize on it as an agent of transformation. >>All right, let's take the customer perspective. I'm the customer, Carl, Carl, why do I need you? And how are you different from the competition? And if I like it, how do I get started? >>Sure. So the, the, the first thing that we differentiate selves from the customer is, or from our competitors is really looking at the API as an entire life cycle of activities. So whether it's from the documentation and the design and the secure source code testing that we can provide, you know, pre-development, or pre-deployment through production posture, through runtime, the differentiator really for us is being a one-stop shop for an entire API security program. And that's very important. And as that one stop shop, the, the great thing about that when having a conversation with a customer is not every customer's at the same point in their journey. And so if, if a customer discussion really focuses on their perhaps lack of confidence in their code testing, maybe somebody else has a lack of confidence in their runtime detection. We can say yes to those conversations, deliver value, and then consider other things that we can do with that customer along a whole continuum of life cycle. And so it allows us to have a customer conversation where we don't need to say, no, we don't do that. If it's an API, the answer is, yes, we do do that. And that's really where we, you know, we have an advantage, I think, in, in looking at this space and, and, and being able to talk with pretty much any customer in any vertical and having a, having a solution that, that gives them something value right away. >>And how do I get started? I like it. You sold me on, on operationalizing it. I like the one stop shop. I, my APIs are super important. I know that could be potential exposure, maybe access, and then lateral movement to a workload, all kinds of stuff could happen. Sure. How do I get started? What do I do to solve >>This? Well, no name, security.com. Of course we, we have, you know, most customers do sandboxing POVs as part of a trial period for us, especially with, you know, being here at AWS is wonderful because these are customers who's with whom we can integrate with. In a matter of minutes, we're talking about literally updating an IAM role. Permission is the complexity of implementation because cloud friendly workloads really allow us to, to do proofs of concept and value in a matter of minutes to, to achieve that value. So whether it's a, a dedicated sandbox for one customer, whether it's a full blown POC for a complicated organization, you know, whether it's here at AWS conference or, or, or Nona security.com, we would love to do a, do a, like a free demo test drive and assessment. >>Awesome. And now you guys are part of the elite alumni of our startup showcase yep. Where we feature the hot startups, obviously it's the security focuses episodes about security. You guys have been recognized by the industry and AWS as, you know, making it, making it happen. What specifically is your relationship with AWS? Are you guys doing stuff together? Cuz they're, they're clearly integrating with their partners. Yeah. I mean, they're going to companies and saying, Hey, you know what, the more we're integrated, the better security everyone gets, what are you doing with Amazon? Can you share any tidbits? You don't have to share any confidential information, but can you give us a little taste of the relationship? >>Well, so I think we have the best case scenario with our relationship with AWSs is, is as a, as a very, very small company. Most of our first customers were AWS customers. And so to develop the, the, the initial integrations with AWS, what we were able to do is have our customers, oftentimes, which are large public corporations, go to AWS and say, we need, we need that company to be through your marketplace. We need you to be a partner. And so that partnership with, with AWS has really grown from, you know, gone from zero to 60 to, you know, miles per hour in a very short period of time. And now being part of the startup program, we have a variety of ways that a customer can, can work with us from a direct purchase through the APS marketplace, through channel partners and, and VA, we really have that footprint now in AWS because our customers are there and, and they brought our customers to AWS with us. >>It's it nice. The customers pulls you to AWS. Yes. Its pulls you more customers. Yep. You get kind of intermingled there, provide the value. And certainly they got, they, they hyperscale so >>Well, that creates depth of the relationship. So for example, as AWS itself is evolving and changing new services become available. We are a part of that inner circle. So to speak, to know that we can make sure that our technology is sort of calibrated in advance of that service offering, going out to the rest of the world. And so it's a really great vantage point to be in as a startup. >>Well, Carl, the CISO for no name security, you're here on the ground. You partner with AWS. What do you think of the show this year? What's the theme. What's the top story one or two stories that you think of the most important stories that people should know about happening here in the security world? >>Well, I don't think it's any surprise that almost every booth in the, in the exhibit hall has the words cloud native associated with it. But I also think that's, that's, that's the best thing about it, which is we're seeing companies and, and I think no name is, is a part of that trend who have designed capabilities and technologies to take advantage and lean into what the cloud has to offer rather than compensating. For example, five years ago, when we were all maybe wondering, will the cloud ever be as secure as my own data center, those days are over. And we now have companies that have built highly sophisticated capabilities here in the exhibit hall that are remarkably better improvements in, in securing the cloud applications in, in our environments. So it's a, it's a real win for the cloud. It's something of a victory lap. If, if you hadn't already been there, you should be there at this point. >>Yeah. And the structural change is happening now that's clear and I'd love to get your reaction if you agree with it, is that the ops on security teams are now being pulled up to the level that the developers are succeeding at, meaning that they have to be in the boat together. Yes. >>Oh, lines of, of reporting responsibility are becoming less and less meaningful and that's a good thing. So we're having just in many conversations with developers or API management center of excellence teams to cloud infrastructure teams as we are security teams. And that's a good thing because we're finally starting to have some degree of conversions around where our interests lie in securing cloud assets. >>So developers ops security all in the boat together, sync absolutely together or win together. >>We, we, we win together, but we don't win on day one. We have to practice like we as organizations we have to, we have to rethink our, we have to rethink our tech stack. Yeah. But we also have to, you have to rethink our organizational models, our processes to get there, to get >>That in, keep the straining boat in low waters. Carl, thanks for coming on. No name security. Why the name just curious, no name. I love that name. Cause the restaurant here in Boston that used to be of all the people that know that. No name security, why no name? >>Well, it was sort of accidental at, in the, in the company's first few weeks, the there's an advisory board of CISOs who provides feedback on, on seed to seed companies on their, on their concept of, of where they're gonna build platforms. And, and so in absence of a name, the founders and the original investor filled out a form, putting no name as the name of this company that was about to develop an API security solution. Well, amongst this board of CSOs, basically there was unanimous feedback that the, what they needed to do was keep the name. If nothing else, keep the name, no name, it's a brilliant name. And that was very much accidental, really just a circumstance of not having picked one, but you know, a few weeks passed and all of a sudden they were locked in because sort of by popular vote, no name was, >>Was formed. Yeah. And now the legacy, the origination story is now known here on the cube call. Thanks for coming on. Really appreciate it. Thank you, John. Okay. We're here. Live on the floor show floor of AWS reinforced in Boston, Massachusetts. I'm John with Dave ALO. Who's out and about getting the stories in the trenches in the analyst meeting. He'll be right back with me shortly day tuned for more cube coverage. After this short break.
SUMMARY :
I'm John feer, host of the cube. And how would you describe today's event? developers and APIs becoming the hero, the hero of digital transformation, the hero of public cloud and kind of in the past now, DevOps cloud scale, large scale data, And because of that, we can develop new capabilities that take advantage of those of those capabilities. And, and again, the tructure exchange could kill you too as well. the risks to that API in production. What are some of the challenges that, that are there and what do you guys do particularly to So a great example of that would be developer designs, happen on the network or gateway box or app, you know, some sort of network configuration that's really a new entrant into the discussion on API security. Posture, and protection. How would you define that? systems and external systems at the same time. All right, so I'm a customer. So the WAFF and the API management plan, those are the key control points and So, so how does that relate to what you guys do? And so we have to have that machine learning approach in order to those two areas with respect to what you guys do? So it's one thing to have secure source code, of course, but then it's also, do we know how that API's And how are you different from the competition? and the design and the secure source code testing that we can provide, you know, pre-development, I like the one stop shop. the complexity of implementation because cloud friendly workloads really allow us to, to do proofs of concept and You guys have been recognized by the industry and AWS as, you know, And so that partnership with, with AWS has really grown from, you know, The customers pulls you to AWS. Well, that creates depth of the relationship. What's the top story one or two stories that you think of the most important stories capabilities here in the exhibit hall that are remarkably better improvements in, that the developers are succeeding at, meaning that they have to be in the boat together. API management center of excellence teams to cloud infrastructure teams as we are security teams. So developers ops security all in the boat together, sync absolutely together But we also have to, you have to rethink our organizational models, our processes to get there, Why the name just curious, no name. and so in absence of a name, the founders and the original investor filled Who's out and about getting the stories in the trenches
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
AWSs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Carl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Karl Mattson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Kurt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
19,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
First question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DevOps | TITLE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tens of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave ALO | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
two areas | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two stories | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
60 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two weeks ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
eightish | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
end of August | DATE | 0.97+ |
first customers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
security.com | OTHER | 0.96+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
John feer | PERSON | 0.95+ |
a decade | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Nona security.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
one customer | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
WAFF | TITLE | 0.91+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
under three years old | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
first few weeks | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
weeks | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
three functional | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
APS | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.82+ |
one stop | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
one- | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
years | DATE | 0.69+ |
last couple | DATE | 0.69+ |
step one | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
CISOs | ORGANIZATION | 0.64+ |
episode four | OTHER | 0.64+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.63+ |
APSEC | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
season two | OTHER | 0.6+ |
Carl Matson | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
every | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
startups.com | OTHER | 0.53+ |
IAM | TITLE | 0.46+ |