Wrap Up with Jeff Frick and Lisa Martin - Food IT 2017 - #FoodIT #theCUBE
>> Announcer: Live from the Computer History Museum, in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE, covering Food IT, Fork to Farm. Brought to you by Western Digital. >> Welcome back to theCUBE, I'm Lisa Martin, with Jeff Frick, and we have just spent a really interesting educational day at the Fork to Farm event, Food IT. Jeff we've spoken with investors, ag-tech experts, folks in academia who are training the next generation of farmers, to Campbell Soup, who's been around since the late 1800s, are really focused on helping the agriculture and food industry combat the challenges of environmental sustainability, of climate change, of labor shortages, it's been a really, really intriguing day, where tech meets food and agriculture. >> Yeah and just a huge opportunity. One of the themes that kept coming up over and over again, is the average age of the farmers today. Heard 70 something, 60 something, whatever, they're getting old, so there's going to be a huge turnover in this industry, so both a challenge as well as an opportunity for the next generation of ag-people to make some of these changes, and change the way the industry works. The other thing that's really interesting that I found Lisa, is that there's really big social issues that are at play here. We talked about water, we talked about labor, that play into this whole thing, sustainability. And again, tying it back to their theme of its fork to farm, how much of that's now driven by the consumer and the industry, it's kind of a reaction to the consumer, which we see over and over and over in all the other shows that we go. The consumerization IT, driven by younger people's interactions with their phones, is setting an expectation of the way they want everything to work. And so, it sounds like the food industry is really at the cutting edge of this, still really early on, but as we saw in some of those market maps, and the innovation is rich, feels like we're really at the start of this thing. So even though this show has been around for a few years, they have the big show in Salinas next week, the Forbes show, that's still really early days of leveraging tech, innovation, to change the food industry. >> It is, and you brought up that the labor shortages, and that was echoed quite a bit today, for a number of reasons. One, the aging population of farmers as you mentioned. Two, also in California, the minimum wage going up, and that's not only going to be a problem Jeff for farmers, but it's actually now pervading into the retail space, where they're going to have to start depending on robotics to be able to create, or to reduce their cost, to provide even fast food. That was something that was quite interesting to me, I hadn't really quite thought about, from that channel perspective. >> Right, right. >> And then as you mentioned, on the tech enabled consumer side, I was talking with Jeff earlier, I kept thinking farm to fork, 'cause farm to table is so trendy now, right? There's a lot of apps. And you gave me this a-ha grasshopper look, and it was really because as consumers we've really demanded so much. We want transparency, we want to know exactly what's in things, and we want organic, and hormone-free, and we also want things delivered whenever, and wherever we want them. We think of the distribution model, has really become very decentralized, and a lot of that being driven by the consumer. On the farm side too, regarding the attrition, there's also a lot of antiquated, especially in the post-harvest supply chain, things that are still written down on paper, traceability is a huge challenge for them. And I think from some of the things we heard today, a lot of the farming, especially in California, they can't really quite see all the data that they have, but they are sitting on a lot of information, that not only could make their farms more efficient, but could also facilitate you think, even knowledge transfer to the next generation of farmers. Right, right. Yeah a lot of talk about kind of there wasn't a lot of data, now it's a data flood. So how do you use those data sources to be more intelligent in what you do? And I specifically asked some of the guests, you know, are kind of the classic big data players participating in this space, and she said, "Not really." They're all kind of holding off on the side waiting to get in. But these are big numbers, this is a big impact. The professor from St. Louis Episcopal talked about a billion dollars worth of strawberries that you got to get off the field, and if you don't have the labor to get it off, and the data to get the labor and to time it right, it's a billion dollars worth of strawberries, and these are big numbers. And the other thing that just fascinated me, is again, this power of the consumer. The Google guy who took basically what was a service just to feed employees and keep them around so they write more code, but using that as a platform to drive much more thoughtfulness and intelligence. And supply chain changes around food, and even called it food shot in reference to the moon shot. >> The moon shot, yes. >> Enabled better diets, shift diets, food transparency, reduced loss and waste, accelerate transformation to a circular food economy. So, and they said, I think he's been at it for 15 years or thereabout. So really an interesting kind of a twist, on what you would not expect from the food service people, you think of them just supplying food. >> Exactly. >> Not trying to drive cultural change. >> Exactly, and trying to scale, but they're using data from their own googlers, to help determine and evaluate what people are doing, what they want, preferences, making it more personal, and using data in that way to also then facilitate some of the upstream, you know from the supply perspective, making things, meeting those challenges that the consumers are demanding, but you said he's been at Google for five years, and when he first got the call being in hospitality for so long, he just thought, "Google, what do they want to talk to me for?" And how revolutionary they've been, and you can think of how much education can happen from Google Food alone. I was quite blown away by that. >> Yeah, the other kind of theme is unused resources. So, one of the food trucks that they had seaweed. Why seaweed? Because it takes no fresh water, it takes no fertilizer, and it's carbon negative. So not really about how does it taste, but some specific reasons to try to make seaweed a better food, a more satisfying food. Talked about kale, and really again what a great example of a, can't say it, Fork to Farm tradition, 'cause before kale was a throwaway, nobody grew kale, now suddenly everybody wants kale smoothies, and so there's nothing, plant became something of importance, driven by the consumer, not necessarily by the producers. So, very dynamic times. I think again, the trend we see over and over and over, finding the hollowing out of the middle. You know, you don't want to be just a generic provider in the middle, you better have massive scale, or you better be a real specialty provider. And then finally the ramifications of the Amazon purchase of Whole Foods, really validating, yes you want digital, yes you want data, yes you want to provide better customer service. But at the same time, you still need a physical presence, kind of validating the physical presence of the store like Whole Foods. So really a very dynamic activity going on in this space. >> And it'll be interesting to see what happens over the next five to 10 years, as farming generationally changes hands. And there is technology that's available today, right? We talked about big data, there's many, many sources of public data, whether it's satellite imagery, water data that can be utilized and then paired with private data that a farm has. Or using GPS devices on tractors and combines, robotics. You talked to the inventor of the Sally Salad machine, there's a lot of technology that might be, I don't know if I'd say ahead of its time, but I think from a farming perspective, there's a little bit of a gap there right now. So it'll be very interesting to see how farms evolve from a technology perspective. I love how the Forbes AgTech Summit, I think it's tomorrow and Thursday in Salinas Valley, what a great juxtaposition of Silicon Valley and a world hub of technology innovation, to Salinas, which is the salad bowl of the world. I think that is quite interesting, and some of the dynamics that they've seen, I think this was their fourth event tomorrow. >> Jeff: Fourth event, right, right. >> Really starting to get more farmers interested in understanding the potential that ag-tech can have on profitability, efficiencies, reducing waste, even things like discovering and preventing foodborne pathogens. >> Right, and robots, we need robots, we don't have enough labor. Michael Rose said there's going to be a shortage of hundreds of thousands of line cooks. Just regular, ordinary line cooks at restaurants, and that's really kind of one of the applications of the salad machine, because as you hit the button below that cook, you can hit the button to load that salad, while you run off and pull the rest of the entree meals together. So, again, it's really fun to see the consistent themes that we see over and over, that's computing cloud and data-driven decision making, applied to what's arguably one of the most important things going on, which is feeding us a lot of conversation about the world's population getting to 10 billion in the not too distant future, that have to be fed. And again, with the aging of the population, the traditional farmers, a real opportunity to do kind of a refresh with a bunch of people that have grown up with these things. So, really cool show, a great day, hope you had fun, I had fun. >> Oh, I had a great time, it was really educational. I think that you hit the nail on the head, there's a tremendous amount of opportunity. I think what the Mixing Bowl is doing, along with Better Foods, is really bringing the people that are creating food, and producing it together, and connecting them with the people that are creating technology. So, I think this is the tip of the iceberg head of lettuce, maybe? So, I am excited to see what happens over time, but not only was it a great event, but I'm now very hungry. >> Now you're very hungry, there's more food trucks outside. Alright Lisa, well thank you again for hosting. >> Thank you. >> Again, another great show. I think last time we were together was at the NAB. >> NAB. >> Talking about media entertainment, so the digitization, transformation continues, driven by all these huge macro-factors of cloud, big data, so the beat rolls on. >> It does. >> Alright, she's Lisa Martin, and I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching theCube. Thanks for watching, we've got a busy spring coming to an end. Had a little bit of a lull in the summer then we'll hit it hard again in the fall, so thanks for watching siliconangle.tv, youtube.com/siliconangle, and siliconangle.com for complete coverage of a lot of stories beyond just theCUBE. I'm Jeff Frick, signing off with Lisa Martin from Food IT, from Fork to Food, thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Western Digital. at the Fork to Farm event, Food IT. and the industry, it's kind of a reaction to the consumer, and that's not only going to be a problem Jeff for farmers, and the data to get the labor and to time it right, So, and they said, I think he's been at it Not trying to drive and you can think of how much education can happen of the Amazon purchase of Whole Foods, and some of the dynamics that they've seen, and preventing foodborne pathogens. and that's really kind of one of the applications is really bringing the people that are creating food, Alright Lisa, well thank you again for hosting. I think last time we were together was at the NAB. so the digitization, transformation continues, Had a little bit of a lull in the summer
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Rose | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Whole Foods | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Western Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Salinas Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Fourth event | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fourth event | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Google Food | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Better Foods | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
late 1800s | DATE | 0.98+ |
Salinas | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Forbes AgTech Summit | EVENT | 0.96+ |
billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Fork to Farm | EVENT | 0.95+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
hundreds of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
NAB | EVENT | 0.91+ |
Fork | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
70 something | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
Mixing Bowl | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
about a billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
youtube.com/siliconangle | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
Forbes | TITLE | 0.75+ |
60 something | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
Food IT | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
Episcopal | PERSON | 0.71+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.71+ |
Food | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
Campbell Soup | PERSON | 0.68+ |
#FoodIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.66+ |
Sally Salad | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.65+ |
Food IT | TITLE | 0.65+ |
some | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
siliconangle.tv | ORGANIZATION | 0.55+ |
Fork | EVENT | 0.51+ |
to Farm | ORGANIZATION | 0.48+ |
theCube | TITLE | 0.46+ |
siliconangle.com | TITLE | 0.43+ |
St. Louis | LOCATION | 0.43+ |
Computer History Museum | ORGANIZATION | 0.41+ |
Kickoff with Jeff Frick and Lisa Martin - Food IT 2017 - #FoodIT #theCUBE
(Exciting Techno Music) >> Live from the Computer History Museum in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE covering food IT: Fork to Farm. Brought to you by Western Digital. >> Hi, welcome to theCUBE. We are live at the fourth annual food IT Fork to Farm Event. I am Lisa Martin with my Co-Host Jeff Frick. Jeff, this is a really interesting event. The first time we've been here with The Cube, and one of the first things I said to you this morning was "Fork to Farm - we always kind of think of it as "farm to fork, right, farm to table." But it's really interesting mix of investors here, people that are very educated in food and agriculture and one of the things they're focused on is connecting people who are feeding the world, billions and billions of people, with the people who are changing the world through technologies. And nowadays we're all this tech enabled food consumer which has really flipped farm to fork from fork to farm which I found really interesting. >> It's pretty interesting, our first kickoff call with Michael Rose from The Mixing Bowl and we were talking about the Conference. I'm like, "Michael didn't you get that mixed up? "Isn't it supposed to be Farm to Fork?" But as you said it's really now the tech enabled consumer and what they want to eat, like everything else, is being so consumer driven that we see in our other shows is driving now what the food producers have to create. And what's interesting is they don't necessarily think of all the ramifications of those decisions upstream and downstream. And so that's a big topic of the theme here. The other thing that struck me is some of the sponsors: Yamaha is here >> Yes. >> And one of the main sponsors. Google is here as one of the main sponsors. And we just had one of the opening keynotes from one of the guys from Google talking about how they've taken really just the task of feeding the employees to a much greater responsibility in both what people eat, how it gets produced, and really more sustainable longterm food kind of as a circle he called it. So it's pretty interesting, I'm excited. We've got Deans from a lot of big schools, we've got, of course, like I said, Yamaha. I'm really curious to find out what they're doing in this space. And it's fun to get, you know, out of the tech infrastructure space to see what's really happening on the front lines. I really want to get into edge computing, I really want to get into cloud, data, you know, all of the themes that we follow over and over and over again, but now a real specific application. And doing some of the research, you know, we have to feed 10 billion people in just a couple years and we're not growing any more land. So how are those challenges being addressed with technology? How are cloud, mobile, data helping solve those problems? And then how are the consumer driven prioritization impacting all of this? So it should be a great day. >> Absolutely, like you said, a great spectrum of guests on the show today. And we think of food and agriculture as one of the largest industries globally and as you said, there's a daunting responsibility feeding billions of people in a very short period of time. Having to deal with environmental sustainability, we're going to be talking about that on the program today, climate change, and also the consumer. But there's tremendous potential for big data and IOT and analytics to improve farming efficiencies from planting to weeding to fertilizing to the post-harvest supply chain logistics, traceability. There's, you know, opportunities for GPS sensors on tractors and columbines, as well as robotics and automation. We're going to be talking to a guy, the CEO Chell Botics, who invented Sally, a robot that makes salads. So there's a tremendous amount of opportunity and I'm really curious to see how these, from the University Folks, the Deans, to the investors, how Venture Capital is really seeing big data as revolutionary, the potential to be revolutionary, for the entire food supply, the food chain. >> Right, right. And another topic that's come up is really transparency and enabling consumers to see kind of where their food comes from, how it was raised, but as come up again in one of the earlier Keynotes, there's no perfect solution, right? There's always trade offs. So how are people creating values, making trade offs based on those values, and how are the food producers now being able to deliver to those values? So it should be, like I said, a fantastic day. We're going to go wall to wall. We'll be here till 5 o'clock today, full slate of guests, a lot of two guests, so we're going to pack them in. And it should be fantastic. >> Absolutely, I'm excited. >> Alright. >> A lot of great topics. >> So she's Lisa Martin, I'm Jeff Frick, you're watching theCUBE from Food IT: from Fork to Farm. We'll be right back with our first guest after this short break. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Western Digital. and one of the first things I said to you this morning was "Isn't it supposed to be Farm to Fork?" And it's fun to get, you know, from the University Folks, the Deans, to the investors, and how are the food producers now being able We'll be right back with our first guest
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Yamaha | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Venture Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Rose | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Western Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
billions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 billion people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
The Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first guest | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
billions of people | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first kickoff call | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Sally | PERSON | 0.91+ |
5 o'clock today | DATE | 0.88+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
first things | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
IT Fork to Farm Event | EVENT | 0.85+ |
c day | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.81+ |
Food IT | TITLE | 0.79+ |
Food IT 2017 | EVENT | 0.76+ |
couple years | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
University Folks | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
one of the main sponsors | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
Chell Botics | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
Fork to Farm | TITLE | 0.7+ |
one of the guys | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
Mixing Bowl | EVENT | 0.65+ |
fourth annual | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
main sponsors | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
Fork to Farm | EVENT | 0.6+ |
to Farm | TITLE | 0.59+ |
Computer History | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
industries | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
#FoodIT | EVENT | 0.5+ |
keynotes | QUANTITY | 0.49+ |
Museum | LOCATION | 0.46+ |
Fork | EVENT | 0.4+ |
John Furrier & Jeff Frick, theCUBE - SAP SAPPHIRE NOW - #SAPPHIRENOW #theCUBE
(upbeat music) >> Hello, and welcome to theCUBE special coverage of Sapphire Now we're here in Palo Alto. Sapphire now SAPs premier conference in Orlando. We are in Palo Alto, we have folks on the ground in Orlando. Special three days of wall-to-wall coverage. Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday. Taking you through all the action from our new studio in Palo Alto, 4,500 square feet. Our chance to cover events when we can't get there in person we certainly can cover it from here. And that's what we're going to be doing for the next three days; we're going to have stories on the ground, no story is too small. We're going to chase 'em all down. We have people calling in, we have folks on the ground that'll be Skyping in, calling in, whatever it takes to get the story out to you, we're going to do it and, certainly, expert coverage from inside the studio here. We got George Gilbert from Wikibon and a variety of folks who did not make it to Orlando will be coming into Palo Alto to sit down and talk with us. I'm John Furrier, my co-host is Jeff Frick. Jeff, we'll do whatever it takes. We'll cover from our studio, we'll go to Orlando virtually we got the Twitter hashtag, Sapphirenow, we're on that. We have folks on the ground, a lot of great news coming out of Sapphire. >> What do ya think? I mean, you were just as Dell EMC World last week and the story was all about, kind of, hybrid cloud and customer choice and it sounds like that's a recurring theme here at SAP, where they've got a lot of cloud options based on what their customer wants to do. >> I mean, if you, I mean this sounds really bad to say for someone who follows the tech industry but I just think this digital transformation thing is just over-played. But it's the, it's the Groundhog's Day moment. The movie just keeps replaying itself. Digital transformation, digital transformation, and, again, just like every other commerce, like Dell EMC World and every other one, digitally transforming your business is the theme. Little bit played, I would say business transformation is, I would say, the next chapter of what's happening and what you see from these shows. Specifically, at Dell EMC World, US ServiceNow, OpenStack, all the different events, Red Hat's been the one we been going to this past couple weeks is the business impact of the technology and SAP highlights that with their results and their keynotes in the news letter drops today, which is, look it, they have been doing SAP for all the top companies powering with SAP. As in Oracle. But now the customers want to go beyond the legacy SAP. And this has been a challenge for SAP over the past five years. They've had all the right messaging, digital dashboards, real time for business, all there. But the problem was they were missing a big piece of it. That is a cloud native and really aligning with the explosive growth of cloud computing, cloud native. Which is the new application developer. This new class of developer is emerging and that's different than the in-house SAP guys, by the way, which is still a massive market. >> Sure. >> That's the big trend. And of course, machine learning, AI, the kinds of design tooling that you'd expect to see, they're calling that Leonardo. >> I think it really shows the power of the consumer and the impact that the big public clouds have had on the marketplace, right? With Google, and with Amazon, especially Microsoft, as well, coming into play. And I think it's, what's interesting on the SAP tact is they have their own cloud. But now they've, you know, are very aggressively following up on an earlier announcement at Google Cloud Platform Show. With more announcements at this show and then they continue to strengthen their relationship with Amazon. So, it's a pretty interesting place, if you're an SAP customer, really having options around where, what cloud and what cloud deployment is really no longer an argument. You've got a lot of options at SAP, very different than Oracle, which is still pretty much exclusively Oracle on the Oracle cloud. Very different kind of a tact. >> Yeah and just reading the hard news from from hitting the ground today down in Orlando is the key points, I'll just summarize it real quick. Expanded SAP Leonardo, Digital Innovation System, SAP Google Expand the Strategic Partnership, SAP Cloud Platform accelerates adoption and proves choice advances consumption for customers. That, essentially, is it. And there's a lot of other subtext going on on Enterprise Cloud, a lot of other massive pockets. But in terms of top-level news, it's Leonardo, okay? Leonardo Da Vinci, dead, creative genius. Okay? But that is all about providing the tools for business to be successful in a digital world. But to me, the big story, Jeff, is the transformation of what used to be called HANA Cloud Platform to SAP Cloud Platform. This is their platform as a service bet around winning the new developers, the cloud native. Last year at Sapphire, we actually had theCUBE on the ground they announced a deal with Apple computer around iOS and developers. That, now, has chip as a general availability so you're seeing SAP bringing two worlds together. The Cloud Native World, which they never played in much to the SAP Eco System, which is flush with cash. There's a ton of money to be made in that world. The install base is massive, now you have Cloud-Computing Hybrid Cloud with the HANA Cloud Platform, I mean the SAP Cloud Platform to bring that in. Again, I still can't even get it right. >> And so, let's just break it down as simply as you can, John. Why do they change the name? And what exactly do they have today? >> Well, here's the first of all problem. I'm so used to saying HANA because they have been branding HANA on >> They been bangin' HANA for the decade, or forever. >> It's just like, in my brain. I just can't get it out. SAP HANA, so anytime, and they actually called it HANA Cloud Platform before. >> Right, right. >> But HANA is such a massive set of capabilities that they really wanted to break out the platform as a service, which is the Cloud Native play, where all the action is for developers. From HANA, a viable product that they have that everyone's using. So, they have two clouds that we can say. SAP Cloud Platform, that's in Cloud Native, and then, HANA Enterprise Cloud. One's a delivery mechanism and one's a developer environment; it's the way I like to think about it. I'm a HANA customer, I'm going to need Enterprise Cloud to take my HANA solution and extend it up with self-service or provisioning, some partnership with AWS Google and the different clouds, getting my legacy HANA Enterprise software to be cloud enabled. That's HANA Enterprise Cloud. SAP Cloud Platforms for folks who don't, who like DevOps, the Cloud Native world that we cover deeply. >> Okay, and then, how do you look at the kind of Google partnership, Google Cloud Platform versus AWS partnership. SAP's goin' dual-track, is it just simply to have choice based on what their customers, are they fundamentally different relationships? How do you read that? >> This is where I think SAP's got genius going on. But if they might screw it up because they can't get out of their own way. >> Jeff: Can't use genius anymore, we've had enough geniuses. >> So, so, this could be a brilliant strike of move for SAP. I think it's a brilliant move in the way they're playing it out. But, again, like I said, SAP, they might not be able to get out of their own way. That's going to be their issue. But from a functionality standpoint, this multi-cloud opportunity; they've been with Amazon for many many years. They announced a partnership with Google which is just kind of toe in the water. That's tryin' to advance pretty quickly. Not a lot of meat on the bone there. And Azure relationships. So, SAP wants to put their cloud platform, that platform as a service, in all the different major clouds so that their legacy can work on pram and in whichever cloud the customer chooses. >> Yeah, I think there is, >> I think, that is a multi-cloud strategy that is viable for SAP. Unlike, say, Oracle, which isn't multi-cloud, it's Oracle Cloud. >> Right, right, right. >> So, you know the SAP Oracle, you know, head-to-head thing has been kind of, like, taking completely different paths. Someone will be right. >> Right. But I think there's more meat on the bone with the Google thing than, maybe, maybe we know of, or are aware of, or whatever. I mean, Burnt did come and get in the keynote with Diane Greene at Google Cloud Platform. And, you know, I think it's relatively significant. What'll be interesting to see how it shapes out and, again, what are the customer choices that are going to drive them to Amazon or to SB Cloud or to the Google cloud. I guess at the end of the day it's about choice and I know that was a big theme at Dell EMC World. Is that everyone has to cater to the choice of the customer or else it's just too easy for them to flip a lot of these other clouds. >> I mean, when I say, "not ready for primetime," I mean, Google's got a lot of work to do. SAP as a company is not as far down the road with Google as they are with Amazon and Azure, just to make my point clear. >> Okay. >> But the do have our announcing additional certifications of the coinnovation between SAP and Google. Between SAP Cloud Platform and Google Cloud Platform. IOT, machine learning, they certified SAP NetWeaver in a variety of S4 HANA, business warehousing; essentially more market place to accelerate the digital transformation. And, again, this is all about SAP co-locating in Google. >> Right, right. >> If a customer wants to take advantage of TensorFlow and all the goodness of, say, Google. That's a good move for SAP and, again, I think this is a brilliant strategy for SAP if they don't screw it up. >> Right, right. And potentially, that's the bridge to, like you said, it's been a little bit of Groundhog Day with cloud, cloud, cloud. But what's really the theme of 2017 is AI machine learning and it's an interesting bridge with Google Cloud, to their TensorFlow as another way to bring AI machine learning into the application learning into the application. >> So, Jeff, we've been covering a lot of events. One comment, I will say, is that SAP always has great messaging. >> I got to say, because we've been covering out eighth year covering Sapphire Now. We've only missed, like, two years over that time span. It's a lot like Oracle on the sense that it's a very business oriented event, but they have good pulse. Bill McDermott, great communicator, great customer-focused person. Always has his hand on the pulse. They have great messaging. And they tend to pick the right waves. And they've had some false starts with cloud, they've bought, had some acquisitions, things been cobbled together, but they've never wavered from their mission. And the mission has always been powering the speed of business, great software solutions. The issue is, they're moving off of SAP to new cloud solutions, so SAP is taking a proactive strike to say, look here, we can play in the cloud, therefore this multi-cloud game is critical for the growth of SAP, in my opinion. >> How much of the SAP in cloud will be new greenfield opportunities, or people want the flexibility, and a lot of the attributes of cloud versus, they're not migrating old R3 instances into the cloud. I mean, this is, I would assume, mainly new greenfield opportunities. >> Well, I think it's both. I mean, I think you have greenfield developers basically that are being hired by their customers to build apps, top line driven apps, and also, you know, some consolidation apps. But mainly, you know, their customers are hiring developers. Hey, we need a mobile app for our business, so you need to have data, you need to have some domain expertise. But at the end of the day, the system of records probably stored in some SAP system somewhere. So what they're trying to do is decouple the dependency between that developer, but still use SAP, but and offer an extension of SAP. It really is an opportunity, in my mind, for that to happen, and also partners. Look at Accenture, Capgemini, all these different partners. They are poised to create some great value and make some cash along the way. Remember the minicomputer boom. People who lined their pockets with cash were the integrators. The large global system integrators. So I think that, and the channel partners are going to have a great opportunity to take advantage of preexisting legacy accounts and to grow them further. >> Well, they certainly have a giant ecosystem. There's no doubt about it. It's one of the startup challenges that, new company starters to build that ecosystem. I mean, they have a giant ecosystem. So, what are you looking for this week besides the obvious announcement? And kind of tells that you want to see to let you know that SAP continues to be on track and move with the shifting tides of the market trends? >> Well do me, I'm looking at the multi-cloud story. It's a good story. Not sure how baked it is, but from a story standpoint, I really like it. I think that whoever can really crack the code on multi-cloud in a viable way is going to be a winner. So to me, I'm going to be looking heavily at the multi-cloud stuff coming out of Orlando. I'm interested to see how the developer traction pans out. I'm really interested in following up on the Apple relationship and see how that pans out. And then ultimately, how the rest of SAP can transform as a business. Because SAP tends to have a lot of buzzwords, a lot of word salad, not a lot of, you know, breaking it down and orchestrating. So to me, SAP, where I'm critical of them is, they kind of can't get out of their own way, Jeff. So, sometimes they kind of get caught in that old world thinking when the world is moving very very fast. Look at Amazon Web Services, you look at what Google's doing, you look at where Vmware is changing. Vmware started Pat Gelsinger. He was in the dumps in 2016, now he's flying high. He went from almost being fired, stock had a 52 week low, to them soaring. They have a market cap that's greater than HPE. So these old incumbent like SAP, they have to transform their culture, get relevant, and get real. And if they can't show the proof points with customer wins and partners, and multi-cloud, then they're going to be on shaky ground. So that's what I'm looking for. >> Jeff: All right, so should be a good week. I'm looking forward to it. >> Okay, we are here in the Palo Alto studio, our new 4,500 square foot operation. We can do coverage here, and then have on the ground coverage of which we will be doing all week Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday for our SAP Sapphire Now. We've got great guests coming in, great editorial coverage. I want to thank our sponsors, SAP, for, you know, allowing us to do this and continuing theCUBE tradition at Sapphire Now. I'm John Furrier with Jeff Frick. More coming after this short break.
SUMMARY :
We have folks on the ground, a lot of great news I mean, you were just as Dell EMC World and that's different than the in-house SAP guys, the kinds of design tooling that you'd expect on the SAP tact is they have their own cloud. Yeah and just reading the hard news from as simply as you can, John. Well, here's the first of all problem. for the decade, or forever. and they actually called it HANA Cloud Platform before. and the different clouds, getting my legacy HANA is it just simply to have choice based on But if they might screw it up Jeff: Can't use genius anymore, Not a lot of meat on the bone there. I think, that is a So, you know the SAP Oracle, you know, I guess at the end of the day it's about choice SAP as a company is not as far down the road But the do have our announcing the goodness of, say, Google. And potentially, that's the bridge to, So, Jeff, we've been covering a lot of events. It's a lot like Oracle on the sense of the attributes of cloud versus, they're not migrating But at the end of the day, the system of records to let you know that SAP continues to be on track on the Apple relationship and see how that pans out. I'm looking forward to it. on the ground coverage of which we will be doing all week
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Bill McDermott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Diane Greene | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
George Gilbert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
4,500 square feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Orlando | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Vmware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
HANA | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
52 week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Wednesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eighth year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SAP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HANA Cloud Platform | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Capgemini | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
HANA Enterprise Cloud | TITLE | 0.99+ |
iOS | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Dell EMC World | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Leonardo Da Vinci | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Enterprise Cloud | TITLE | 0.99+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SAP Cloud Platform | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Brianna Frank and Jason McGee, IBM | CUBE Conversation
>> Announcer: From the theCUBE studios in Palo Alto and Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE conversation. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE coming to you from our Palo Alto studios. Today we're going to have a CUBE conversation really about this kind of ongoing evolution of cloud, and it was a huge deal, and AWS came on the scene and really launched kind of the public cloud evolution, which not only was a different technology stack, but really a different way to think about things, a different way to think about workloads. And that has evolved to hybrid cloud and multicloud, and it just continues to evolve over time. So we're going to get some of the experts in from IBM to talk about their perspective and what they're doing all about it. So we're excited to invite our next guest. She is Briana Frank. She's the director of product management for IBM. Briana, good to see you. Where are you joining us from today? >> I am joining you from Wake Forest, North Carolina. And as you can see, I'm from my home office, but always busy working and fun doing things in the cloud and thinking about new technologies even when we're at home. >> Excellent. And also joining us, many-time CUBE alumni Jason McGee, IBM fellow, vice president and CTO of IBM Cloud Platform. Jason, great to see you again. I looked it up before we turned on the cameras. I think you've been on, like, eight times. So you're definitely a VIP in the CUBE alumni world. Where are you joining us from today? >> Yeah, I mean, I'm in Apex, which is outside of Raleigh, and great to be here again. It's always fun to talk to you guys. It's been a little while, but great to be back. >> Yeah, so let's just jump into it, right? You've all seen the memes revolving around what's driving your digital transformation. Is it the CEO, the CIO, or COVID? And we all know the answer to the question. It's really been an interesting time, right? It was kind of a light switch moment in mid-March. And then people are saying, you know, years and years of digital transformation kind of suddenly compressed into this light switch moment. But now we're months and months and months later, we're in October, and it's clear that this is not just a a one-time fix and wait till we all go back to work. This is going to continue for a while. And cloud is such a huge enabler. Had this happened five years ago, 10 years ago, 15 years ago, the ability for information workers, like the businesses that we're in, would've been much more difficult. So acknowledging that there's still a lot of people hurting, a lot, hospitality industry, restaurant industry, sports places that aggregate people, concerts. We're fortunate we're in the information industry. And I'd just love to get your perspective, Jason, on cloud as an enabling platform and really an enabling way of thinking about things that have made this transition a little bit less painful than it otherwise would've been. >> Yeah, that's a great point, Jeff, and I think on one hand it's been pretty amazing to see how much our industry in technology and IT has been able to kind of adapt to COVID, adapt to working at home, adapt to these kinds of changing models. But what's been really interesting is as someone who spends all their time thinking about cloud every day, it's been really incredible to see how much it's accelerated people's adoption of cloud. Like, obviously everyone was leveraging cloud. They had plans to move more and more workloads to cloud. But I think over the last six months we've really seen a massive acceleration, and I also think kind of a mindset shift that maybe before there was some hesitation and conversation about what things move to cloud and what things don't, and that seems to have kind of gone away, and everyone's like, this is the model that not only will carry us through moments like this, but we have newfound confidence that it's the right model for us to move the majority of our businesses to. >> Right. >> So really massive acceleration. >> Massive acceleration. And Briana, get your take, 'cause you're a product manager, so you're in the weeds on the speeds and feeds and the features and functions. Cloud as a concept sounds kind of simple, but the execution is not so simple. And we've seen kind of this morphing from moving your test dev maybe to a public cloud, IBM has a cloud, to there's some stuff that just can't go on the cloud or shouldn't go to the cloud or I'm not sure if it should go in the cloud. So now we're hearing talk of hybrid cloud and multicloud, and we're hearing pieces of public cloud in my own data center and pieces of my own data center in a public cloud. It's a pretty complicated space. I wonder if you can kind of share your perspective as this thing morphs from kind of a simple concept and a beautiful little icon to a much more complex execution in the real world. >> Well, great question and insights. And I think, building off of what Jason said, I think the most important shift I've seen is really a mind shift, a mindset shift. And there's so much more empathy that I'm seeing across the board, whether it's children running in the background or cats and pets, there's a lot more tolerance for work-life balance and a lot more empathy for how people are getting through this really challenging pandemic. And what I think is interesting is that kind of carries over into the technology. And so now where some of our clients were solving problems like keeping their workforce safe by using video analytics to see if someone's using or wearing maybe a hard hat in a construction zone. Now that use case has sort of shifted, and now it's is someone wearing a mask? Do they have a temperature? How do we make sure that the office areas are sanitized and clean so that when people go back to work, they'll be working in a safe environment? So I think that the mindset shift is really driving a lot of these technology innovations. And then of course you need cloud to make those real. So I think that's the kind of aha moment I've seen is that people are leading with empathy and that's driving kind of the next wave of innovation that I'm seeing. >> I have to say I've been doing these many, many years, and Briana, I don't think anyone has brought up empathy at the at the head end of the open. And I love that 'cause I think that's a way to think about it, right? 'Cause these are people trying to execute business activities, and it's not easy. And that's a really great take. Jason, I want to go back to you and talk about one of the things we talked about the cloud, but really it's about enabling applications, right? And really, the application now has become this first class citizen where it's, this is the app I want. Cloud enables me to use whatever infrastructure I need versus this is the infrastructure I have. Hm, what can I put on this app? So I'd love to get your take. As you said, you think about cloud all the time, but really, cloud is an app enabler. And how has, as that capability has been gifted to people, how has that made the the cloud execution a lot more complex? >> Yeah, you know, it's interesting. I think you're hitting on a really key transformation that's happened in cloud over the last few years, which is that it's gone from infrastructure kind of cost optimization to an application delivery accelerator. And what I think that's caused is everyone's starting to kind of move their thinking up the stack in cloud, and you see the rise of technologies like Kubernetes and OpenShift as a platform that enables application developers to build applications and deliver them more quickly. I think the acceleration that we've been talking about here has cemented that. At the end of the day, we're all trying to figure out in our businesses how to adapt to change. We have some new changes this year that maybe we didn't predict we would have last year. We're trying to figure out how to adapt to those to deliver new capabilities, to maybe build a digital experience for something that we didn't have a digital experience for before, 'cause now nobody is face to face. And that requires cloud to be much more application-centric. It requires cloud, you alluded to this kind of evolution. I think it's starting to drive cloud into more places. Cloud isn't about just getting into some big cloud data center somewhere. Cloud is about a style of working and a set of technologies that I want to be able to consume wherever I need them. So that kind of application-centric capability and the rise of cloud-native technologies I think go hand in hand. >> Right, so it got to us from a simple dev swiping a credit card to do a little project on Amazon to now enterprising having very complex ecosystems, right? Very complex situation because they've got lots of different clouds and lots of different apps running on lots of different clouds, and the application and the control of those is now much more complicated than probably when you just had it all in your own data center or if you're some cloud data organization and you grew up on the public cloud and you really are kind of a single app that happens to be a big one in hyperscale. So I'm curious, Briana, you guys have a ton of customers. What are they telling you about what they're doing with hybrid cloud, managing hybrid cloud, trying to get back to some of the simplicity and kind of the simplistic vision and execution when what's happening is probably increasing complexity as different apps are running on different clouds, different places. >> Yeah, great question. You know, I think that what we're hearing from our clients is really a couple of things. One is that they have to find ways to unburden their teams. They only have limited resources and the sky's the limit in terms of what's possible. So they need to be able to innovate faster, but they have to unburden the team. So the rise of "as a service" I think is really coming into its own because teams don't have time to manage things like Kubernetes. They have to go higher in the stack and really start to build and innovate for their own business differentiation. But another I think really important thing that we're hearing from our clients is that we have to meet them where they are in their journey. So what you said was great. A lot of our clients are using five to nine different clouds today, and that's extraordinarily fragmented, and being able to manage and have one way to see what workload is running where and what is running on that workload is really important. And having kind of one single pane of glass where they can manage everything is one of the single most important features that I hear that is needed. And I think the other thing that I hear a lot from clients is they need flexibility. They need flexibility for, you know, where they are in their journey. Some folks, they need to be able to deploy to existing infrastructure that they have in their data center, and others need to be able to deploy to another public cloud. And having the flexibility to run anywhere is one of the more common themes that I'm seeing. >> Right, so, and you guys built something to help with that, right? It's the IBM cloud satellite. So you just basically outlined the customer challenge, so what did you have to do to enable them to have a single pane of glass, to have more control across these disparate projects running in disparate clouds. >> Well, so one of the things that we found is our clients really, all of the agility that they need to adopt cloud data best practices, really comes from the public cloud. The public cloud services, DevOps, all the tools that allow you to really run and move faster and innovate faster, but they needed that ability to consume those public cloud services anywhere. So at the edge, on another public cloud, or in their existing infrastructure. And of course there's tons of infrastructure options. We have infrastructure for our clients that they can use. We have turnkey appliances. But really having that public cloud, cloud-native agility, but really bringing that anywhere that our clients want to run it is the key to satellite. >> Right, right. So it's not kind of what would be typically thought of as a hybrid cloud solution per se, but it's really almost kind of a level up, if I'm hearing you correctly, in controlling all the different kind of instances or instantiations of your cloud execution. That'd be accurate, Jason? >> Yeah, well, or maybe another way to think about it is it's a way of consuming hybrid, right? It's a way of consuming these hybrid cloud capabilities. Hybrid starts with a common platform, and this idea that we are using things like OpenShift as that common technology platform that enables customers to build applications once and run them anywhere. What satellite brings to the table is it takes that base technology platform and it delivers it as a cloud service, and a cloud service that's flexible enough to be anywhere. And so you kind of combine the best of both. You combine a common technology approach and you combine the as a service API-based consumption model of public cloud to get a hybrid strategy that's super flexible, right? And now really lets customers focus on the work that they're doing going faster. And at IBM, we've been pretty clear that we think the future of hybrid cloud computing is rooted in technologies like Kubernetes and OpenShift, that that's the platform of the future. The acquisition of Red Hat was motivated by that strategy. Our public cloud for the last three-plus years has been built internally on top of the same technologies. And so what we've done with satellite from a technology perspective is we've taken the things that we do in our cloud and we've used the power of of Kubernetes and OpenShift to deliver those anywhere, right? And to give customers that same experience on their infrastructure or on some other public cloud. >> Right. I love it because it's kind of cloud on cloud, if you will, but it really supports this notion of the customer experience, and even more importantly in some ways, the developer experience to make sure that your developers inside the house are feeling good, have a great productive environment so they can do a better job with what they're working on. And that that sounds like something they would really, really enjoy and be native to the way they're used to working already. >> It's interesting too, one of the kind of interesting, I don't know, adoption trends we're starting to see with approaches like satellite is if you think about cloud, I'll oversimplify, but you could say there's kind of two big transformations. One is move my workload to a public cloud, and the other is change how my team works, right? Adopt cloud-native, agile best practices. And often to get to the culture change of the team, you had to start with moving the app, but that's hard, especially for the kind of 80% of workloads that we're seeing move to cloud now where they're complex. They have lots of ties into data that you have in your data center. So it's hard to move them sometimes. So with approaches like satellite, you can kind of flip the order. You can bring the cloud in house, if you will. You can start to adopt self-service and API-based consumption and DevOps and change how your teams work and make them more efficient without moving the applications. And then later, if it makes sense to move them, you can, right? And I think that's really powerful. >> Right, right. Briana, I want to go back to you on kind of the nuts and bolts. 'Cause I don't know if you've read "Innovator's Dilemma" by Christian Clayton. You should if you haven't. But one of the things is how do you prioritize what you're building? How do you prioritize your feature stack? Because you have to, right? You have to put one in front of the other, and it's going to drive your design decisions and what you ultimately ship. So as you were thinking about satellite, what were kind of your top-level design priorities that you're really building this towards that you wanted to make sure you really nailed? >> Oh, what a great question. I love that question. I'm so passionate about product and design and I think we take it very seriously at IBM, and it's, we have an amazing design department, if you will, at IBM. And one of the things we do is just relentlessly interview our clients, and we really try to understand what their main issues are. And one of the first use cases that we we looked at was actually in the financial industry, which was, in the financial services industry, the differentiation is really all about the technology itself, and so they're constantly having to innovate at a faster pace so they can bring new features and functions to their clients but they have this dilemma where they have to, in some cases, in many cases, keep the data on-prem in a specific location. And that starts to get really interesting, because sometimes the regulations, it could be country, it could be a compliance thing, but for whatever reason, there is a specific requirement, and sometimes that comes with a fine if that data doesn't reside in that location. So having the ability to move at an incredibly fast pace and keep innovating, but keep that data on-prem and offload the management of Kubernetes and the services that allow them to move fast. That was one of the first use cases that we tackled. And I think that's a pretty important one, because if you can get that right, that starts to permeate all other industries, because you want to, you have to be secure. You have to make sure that the data resides and is on-prem and in a specific location and that it's auditable. So I think that was one of our first use cases, and that has served us really well. We also, one of the things that we do inside of IBM is that we co-develop using our own internal workloads. And so we use the data and AI team within IBM will GA with us when we GA IBM Cloud Satellite, and so their workloads are running on top of satellite. And I think that's a great way to come to market because when you're delivering an MVP, but if you can deliver an MVP that's already running a really complex AI workload, that's a pretty impressive MVP, if you ask me. So we try to do that whenever we release new products, and I think that has served us very well because it really forces us to solve the really hard problems first. We don't have a choice. We have to be able to make some pretty strategic choices upfront to be able to deliver something like that. >> That's great. Jason, I want to go back to you and talk about a little bit beyond the cloud, but things that are really interesting and happening, right? You already talked about this big enabler with containers and Kubernetes, but this next thing that's coming, right, is just edge, which is an extension of the cloud, an outpost to the cloud, but this whole concept of getting outside of the data center but actually now starting to bring the compute to the devices that generate the data as well as need that. How do you see that kind of impacting your cloud thoughts? I love that you're thinking cloud all the time. And the other piece, keying off of what Briana just said, is applied AI, right? I mean, I think we all would agree that AI and machine learning as kind of a standard, generic thing is okay, but really the application of the AI and the machine learning for specific use cases is where we're seeing huge, huge benefit. And I would imagine there's many, many kind of areas within cloud execution that AI and machine learning can start to add even more and more and more efficiencies and automation. >> Sure, sure. So maybe a couple comments. I mean, I think the edge thing is so interesting because if you really kind of step back and think about what we were talking about with cloud, what is a cloud is becoming much more diverse. Started as it's these three regions and it's becoming everybody's data centers plus on-prem, and then it's becoming edge, large edge locations, and then it's becoming devices. So clouds are becoming pervasive as a concept across all IT consumption models. And there's core technologies, even, like containers that we think apply at all those levels. They apply in the core cloud, in the data center, at the edge, in a device. And so things like satellite certainly give us a mechanism to push that boundary, to push closer to the end user. And there's a ton of scenarios motivating that. 5G telecommunications and high-speed networking for mobile devices is necessitating pushing closer to where the data's getting generated. IoT, same thing. If you think about the IoT edge case, that's massive data generation. You don't necessarily want to backhaul that all the way back to a central cloud. You want to be able to do AI and training and inferencing on that data close to where it lives. And so you need this whole idea of cloud to kind of expand, and if it doesn't, then what happens is all of these different use cases become like different technology stacks or different operational models and you get tons of complexity. So it's this really interesting intersection, and I think we're getting much more complex in how we deploy, but we're trying to put common ideas over the top of it to simplify, and I think that's pretty interesting. On the AI question, you're right, there's tons of places where AI, applied AI will come into the picture. At IBM, we're doing a ton of work on AI for IT operations and how do we apply AI modeling to monitoring, to resiliency, even to workload placement. I mean, just think about the world we just described. As a customer, maybe I have IBM cloud and I have 20 satellite locations in all our fun places in the world, and now I have to make decisions about what runs where and where should I deploy my workloads and what's the most efficient way to place workloads to get availability or better performance, and AI plays a role there. So I see a really bright future as we build out this infrastructure to then use AI as a mechanism to further simplify the customer's consumption of cloud. >> Yeah, that's great. So I want to give you both the last word before we sign off, and that was a good summary, Jason. Cloud's been around for a while and it gets tossed around, and again, now we have hybrid and multi and all these different flavors. You guys are in the weeds and you're seeing down the road a little bit. What is it about cloud that most people probably aren't talking about when you kind of look in your crystal ball, obviously don't share any secrets that you can't share, that gets you excited and makes you think, wow, we're still really, hard to believe, but really in the early days of what this really, the kind of opportunities that this opens up. And I'll go with you first, Briana. >> Well, that's a great question. I think we're already starting to see that with the example of all of the work that we're seeing in the COVID space. It just feels like whatever challenge that might lie ahead in our future, we have an ability to quickly iterate and change and adapt. It's so interesting to see how fast we can roll out new technologies and new ideas. Things that would take years to put together you can kind of put together in a week or so with a quick POC. And that's really an exciting kind of place to be that you can adapt and change so quickly. So I think that's one. And I do think your point about edge is really an important one. There's more and more opportunities to distribute workloads closer to, compute goes closer to where the users are, so therefore you're reducing latency, so you're getting instant feedback. And I think that's really going to be interesting. And then I think the third element, again, is like security and compliance. How do you know exactly that your data stays exactly where you want it to, and you can have proof and you can audit that data. I think that's really where the future's headed. >> Yeah, that's great. And Jason, to you, what's getting you up in the morning today? >> Oh, you don't want to know what gets me up today. But if we talk about what's coming, so for me, my whole career, I've really been thinking about applications. And I think one of the kind of macro trends that everyone doesn't always see that's going on in cloud is we're switching from an IT infrastructure-centric view of computing to an application-centric view. And all of these things we've been talking about are kind of steps along that journey. We're getting to a point where I can build applications, I can build them in a consistent way, I can deploy them anywhere in the world on this incredibly diverse infrastructure. As a developer, I have simple, immediate access to world-class capabilities, to specialized hardware. We are really in the midst of a transformation on how we build computing technology and really a democratization of that technology that 10 or 15 years ago you wouldn't have had the, most people would not have had the funds to stand up the technology they needed to build these things. And that's what really gets me excited, because I think about, well, then what's all the innovation that's going to come from that? As more and more developers have access to this powerful infrastructure in these diverse ways, what are they going to create? And that's what's, I think, going on under the covers. I think we're in the middle of a generational transformation of technology that will result in things we can't predict today because we'll open up so many people's ability to leverage that platform. >> What a great thought to close on, Jason, 'cause I think we hear that consistently all the time. What's the key to innovation? Give more people the access to the tools, give more people access to the data and more people the power to do something with it and create. And we hear all the time about the disadvantaged classes of people that just didn't get the opportunity, and if all those people had the same school, the same education, and now the same basically infinite compute power at their disposal, what are they going to invent? And I think it's an exciting future, and I think that's a great place to close. So we'll leave it at that. I want to thank you both for checking in. Briana, great to meet you, and Jason, always good to see you, as well. >> Yeah, nice to meet you. >> Yeah, great to be here, thank you. >> All right, thanks a lot and have a great day. >> Thank you. >> All right, that was Briana and Jason. I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (bright music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world, And that has evolved to And as you can see, Jason, great to see you again. and great to be here again. and it's clear that this is and that seems to have kind of gone away, and the features and functions. and that's driving kind of the next wave and talk about one of the things And that requires cloud to be and kind of the simplistic vision And having the flexibility to run anywhere to help with that, right? it is the key to satellite. in controlling all the and OpenShift to deliver and be native to the way and the other is change and it's going to drive So having the ability to move and the machine learning and now I have to make and that was a good summary, Jason. and you can have proof and And Jason, to you, We're getting to a point where and I think that's a great place to close. lot and have a great day. All right, that was Briana and Jason.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jason | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Briana | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Briana Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jason McGee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Raleigh | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Innovator's Dilemma | TITLE | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brianna Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Christian Clayton | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third element | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
one-time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Wake Forest, North Carolina | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
15 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
mid-March | DATE | 0.98+ |
eight times | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one way | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Today | DATE | 0.97+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
10 | DATE | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.97+ |
single app | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
IBM Cloud Platform | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
OpenShift | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Apex | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
three regions | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
first use cases | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
nine different clouds | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
20 satellite locations | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Cloud Satellite | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.91+ |
Erez Yarkoni, Check Point Software Technologies | AWS re:Invent 2020
(upbeat music) >> Narrator: From around the globe, it's the cube with digital coverage of AWS re:invent 2020, sponsored by Intel, AWS, and our community partners. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with the cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of AWS re:invent 2020. It's virtual this year, just like everything is virtual this year. But it's still the biggest event in cloud, and we're excited to be back. I'd like to welcome in our next guest, he is Erez Yarkoni, head of cloud and telco technologies for checkpoint software technologies. There it is great to see you. >> Nice to see you, Jeff. Thank you for hosting me this morning. >> Absolutely, so let's jump into it. You've been in the cloud space. For a while I saw a great interview with you, I think like four or five years ago, when I was doing some research, and you're talking about, all the great innovation that's coming from cloud. That was years and years ago. Now, suddenly, we had COVID arrived. And I'm sure you've seen all the social media means who's driving your digital transformation, the CEO, the CMO, or COVID. And we don't know what the answer is. So first off, I'd just love to get your perspective, you've been in this a long time now that we're here in 2020, both in terms of the development of the cloud and the adoption of the cloud, as well as this accelerant that came into our lives in March. >> Hey Jeff, You know I have been lucky that I got to participate in this kind of innovation cycle of IT and technology. Earlier, I was a CIO for an organization, large organization, and we were adopting cloud. At the same time, as an organization, we were selling technologies and networks to our customers, and they were asking to adopt cloud and so on. And these are probably some of the early interviews we looked at. So I got lucky that I had to look at my own organization and understand where cloud is beneficial. And obviously, now I work with cybersecurity and secure in the cloud. So it's all come together. I think that as as cloud technologies came in, it really came in to help many of us address the fundamental need to come to market with business capabilities and functionality faster. For those of us in technology, you know we were probably always the bottleneck of our business counterparts that said. Well, if you could only do this for me, I could grow the business, I could change your business, I can go to other places, I can incrementally bring more customers, revenues, and so on. The cloud platforms have done a tremendous job allowing developers and operators have technology to change the speed in which they service their businesses. But with speed comes security. And I think the cloud platforms disneynow. Specifically, here platforms like AWS build security into into the cloud as well. But there's other needs in it and the pandemic or COVID. All it did is it shifted some of these motions into another gear and then it created some new business needs that can only be service that digital mean, you are now having a collaboration session over a digital channel where otherwise would be probably sitting in the same studio. So definitely collaboration has changed. Commerce have changed, especially for some organizations that never planned to do commerce over digital channels, small businesses and so on. Just think about the food delivery industry and how many new customers have now sole, restaurants that have now signed up for food delivery services that must have exploded. These continuous changes brought continuous needs to address security as well. AWS is allowing people to build some amazing applications. I watched the commercials when I watch football on Sunday. Right? So peloton and zoom in education and many other things. And yeah, so when people build those amazing applications, the next thing they need to do is make sure that the zoom session is secure. And nobody's crashing in if you have a bunch of kids doing zoom for school. >> Erez you talked on so many topics on that. So let's break a few of them down. First off, I just, you know thank goodness for cloud, right? >> Yeah >> If this pandemic had hit 10 years ago, 15 years ago, we would not have been able those of us in the IT industry to shift so easily to cloud based or excuse me to working from home or working from anywhere because of the cloud based applications huge enabler. But it's funny now once on what you just talked about, did you talk about cost savings? And I still find there's a lot of people that are looking at cloud as a way to save costs. You been in it for a while, and you know the truth is all about agility and speed of business, speed of adoption, speed of innovation. You said it in every single one of your answers. But it still seems to be a lag for a lot of people now with with COVID, and, you know securing people work from home, one of the big issues go back to security is increasing attack surface. And we know the increasing sophistication of the bad guys. Now, I'm hearing from some people that they're actually using old techniques that they used to use back in the day because they know people are at home, and maybe things are as locked down. You talk about security needs to bake be baked in all long the way we're using all these, more and more cloud based apps. How do people think about the security perspective? How do you bake it into everything that you do? And how do you respond to the increased attack surfaces that have now suddenly opened up to look like for probably a little while not just going back to the old way, anytime soon? >> Yeah, so you know, you you touched on that, you said that you hear about people using old secure the old attack methods or vectors or so on, coming back, because people are now at home and no longer behind a very secure environment in their office or in the data center, people had to maybe move things that they never thought they would call center operations. That was by definition, you showed up to the call center for certain organizations and moved it out. And they may have not been ready to move those applications so on, so they had to address the security of it. I think that's exactly it, which is now some of the reaction we had to have for just staying in business. We used kind of very older, or, we increased what we know about security about remote access by increasing VPN capacity for the organization or, or those type of methodologies. Now people are looking at what happened to our topology to our architecture, where are people and machines coming in to execute their work over the network? Where are the applications residing? What have we moved to the cloud because we had to know flex for capacity and speed and maybe localize and move it into regions and so on. I don't think it was about cost saving, as you think it was about business agility, especially in this phase. I actually think that at the end of the day, the big benefit from cloud is business agility. Cost has to come with it, we cannot sacrifice costs and everything we do. And we look at overall how we use cloud technologies and other technologies and make sure that the cost fits into what our business demands from a cost structure but it is about business agility. Now, it's also about security agility. So people are building, you know methods and capabilities to match the business agility with security and security was, at least for me, for instance, as as a CIO, security was a bottleneck. So when business demanded the Agile development, you know iterations, sprints, deliver functionality in weeks, and, you know keep pouring it into the environment. One of the inhibitors was security, right, we weren't ready for it, we weren't ready to release it. So we had to find a way to adopt it. And then came in companies like AWS, saying, we built some of that security built into the platform. And companies like checkpoint saying we have cloud security that moves at cloud speed and allows you to integrate into your CICD, environmental or, or processes and allows you to match the speed of the business with the speed of security. >> Yeah, that's great. I mean, again, I agree with you, 100%, it's all about agility, and speed of business. And being able to move faster just always surprises me how people how many people are still kind of stuck on the cost saving piece. And then the other thing, of course, which you're super aware of, if you've ever been to one of kind of the technical keynotes at AWS re:invent the amount of investment that they can make an infrastructure including security, in just, just completely over overshadows anything in an individual company can invest just in terms of the resources and then somebody like you guys can leverage on top of not only using the the massive Amazon, kind of core investments in security at the infrastructure layer, but then all the stuff that you guys can do in terms of securing the enterprise and helping make sure that the right people have access to the right information at the right time, but not a lot more than that. I wonder if you can talk about a new kind of zero trust in some of the evolution within security in terms of the posturing, and how you kind of make assumptions, as we said, it's no longer like a wall anymore, it's no longer talking about having these physical borders, or even logical borders, but it's really about access and breaking down access even to the person in the application and the data etc. >> Yeah, I think you asked specifically about zero trust, and I think that we want to move, maybe want to keep that the the theme here around the application security, I'll get to zero trust at the end. You know, so one of the things that that definitely is thematic, or what we see happening is, in the evolution in the maturity curve of adopting the cloud, the initial adoption was, maybe some lift shift from organizations and the IaaS layer was a big player. But the PaaS layers of the cloud are where all the interesting things happen, where all the exciting services, all the innovation coming from organizations like AWS, all the enablers for a business agility, and capabilities are coming from there. And when you start developing your applications for that PaaS layer, we start leveraging the services, the type of security changes, so you're no longer looking at network security, or maybe northeast, east west, north south, east west type of security on your network, you're now looking at security API's and securing the backplane of the cloud, from those services that they give you, you know you get to encrypt your buckets, you got to make sure your security groups are correct, you want to make sure your serverless functions are not executing anything malicious in them or, or talking to IP addresses, they shouldn't be. Same with your container, you want to make sure that your container code is scanned properly, you didn't download anything in there that's malicious. And obviously, have runtime security, both to make sure you're compliant from a posture perspective, you make compliance may require you to be PCI compliant one of those. So the elevation in which you execute to security changed from the from the stack from a kind of a traditional stack, requires different capabilities and between what AWS has built into the platform and what checkpoint puts together in cloud guard. This is big, the big target, then we get into, okay, so how do you access all these great things that we just built? Right? So we built these, this great application? It's sitting on AWS, it's using some of the great services there. How do you how do you get to it? Who gets to it? How do you get to it? This is where some of these, sassy and zero trusts come in. Because what happened is, you used to come into a lot of enterprise applications from the data center, then we moved some web apps, and you came over the web into the application. So we have some web firewalls and security for that. Now you're getting into every application from the edge of the network, because we are all at home, or we are we used to be traveling but a lot more of us are now at home coming over the edge of the network, we're adding IoT devices coming on via generic and so on, there's a lot more volume coming at you. And you get to find different ways than just VPN authentication of the traffic into so we are coming into the age of having to identify who's coming at the application at the capability at any given time. And that's where you come into the framework of zero trust, I, every time you come in, I'm going to authenticate that is you. And there's different methodologies in there. For instance, one of the things that we just added to our portfolio is the ability to put an agent, let's say in your around your AWS application, and allow remote access with no VPN to your enterprise app aah to an acquisition company we call odo without having to put a VPN so the administrator defines what applications are connected to the connector. They define who's the users that are allowed and authenticate them based on the authentication framework, let's say Octo, something like that, and allows them to come in and that that those are the type of capabilities you need in these new frameworks. So, how do you get to these great applications we're building? >> Right, right. And you touched on something really interesting, right, which is, which is the complexity is only going up? As you mentioned edge you mentioned a little bit of IoT, right, so as 5G comes on board, as IoT gets increasing amounts of traction. All these applications are API based there's all types of information flying back and forth, so I wonder if you can share kind of your guys thoughts on, applied machine learning and artificial intelligence to help, you know kind of get through all the all the signal or excuse me all the noise, find the signal, and really, you know bring more automation to help the security experts in the security systems be more effective at their jobs. >> Yeah, so I think a lot of what we talked about, until now was protecting establishing a new perimeter, there's not really a perimeter, right because we talked about the perimeter has grown and it's fuzzy and it's at scale that really doesn't allow you to say I have it for an undersea up to authentic everybody. But like you said, with that speed, and scale, came a lot of data, you got a lot of logs running in there, you're like got a lot of events, you got a lot of things that you can look into. And by looking into them, you can start with machine learning and those type of AI methodologies start looking both to identify things before they happen, or inform organizations and inform about things that are already happened and they're in and potentially remediate them. At checkpoint, for instance, we have something called the threat, the threat cloud, we collect these events from every gateway, every appliance, every virtual appliance, every type of security agent that we have around the world, into the flex cloud that processes and I'm going to throw a number there, that's the closer about 80 billion a day transactions. >> 80 billion with B >> Yeah, and that allows us to, to process to apply machine learning and AI algorithms to find threat, and then inform all these great checkpoint security agents out there of new threats and prevent those threats from ever happening in the in the environment. Right? If you're operating on a on an AWS environment, there's a lot of blood flows happening in your environment, there's a lot of things to collect and look at, right. So in cloud guard, we offer something called logic log.ic, which allows you to harvest those logs, we enrich them and then we allow threat hunting inside those environment, right. So those types of capabilities are definitely kind of the future of advanced security, right. So beyond just establishing, it's like, you establish your security around what you do. And then you have your intelligence unit starting to identify what signals are out there allowing you to both prevent security breaches or any type of threats, but also remediate anything, any, you find the traces of things that happened and remediate them. >> Right, right. Well, there is that's, that's a great illustration of, kind of baking security into the multiple steps of the process and all the steps of the process. That's not just a bolt on anymore. It's got to be, part of everything you do and baked into everything you do. I still, I still wonder how certain companies that that are run by having people click on links that they're not familiar with still happen today. But I guess, I guess they still do. So as I give you the final word, again, you've been in this space for a long time, as we kind of turned to turn the page on 2020. What are some of your priorities we are you excited about for 2021? >> I think the most exciting things for us in cloud security in 2021 is we're releasing more capabilities into into the environment, we're in the maturity curve, of protecting, your network in the cloud, and then protecting your posture in the cloud. We're moving very strongly into predicting your runtime and applications in the cloud, your API's, and working with organizations through that maturity curve and getting them up to all the way up to threat hunting capabilities. And I think that'll be exciting because I hear from customers that they need to move quickly through that maturity curve of cloud security as they have accelerated and continue there to accelerate their move to the cloud. >> Well, that's great. Well, I think, no shortage of job security in the cloud security space. So I'm sure it will be a busy year. Well, it was thanks for sharing your insight. Really appreciate the time and it was great catching up. >> Thank you, Jeff, for your time today. And it was great talking to you. >> Absolutely. All right. Well, he's Erez I'm Jeff. You're watching the cubes, continuous coverage of AWS re:invent 2020 Thanks for watching. I'll see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
it's the cube with digital coverage But it's still the biggest event in cloud, Thank you for hosting me this morning. and the adoption of the cloud, and secure in the cloud. you know thank goodness for cloud, right? in the IT industry to shift so easily and make sure that the cost fits into in the application and the data etc. So the elevation in which you execute in the security systems that you can look into. are definitely kind of the future of the process and all the steps and applications in the cloud, your API's, in the cloud security space. And it was great talking to you. I'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Erez Yarkoni | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
15 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sunday | DATE | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
four | DATE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.96+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.96+ |
about 80 billion a day | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
PaaS layer | TITLE | 0.94+ |
PaaS | TITLE | 0.93+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Agile | TITLE | 0.91+ |
COVID | EVENT | 0.9+ |
years | DATE | 0.89+ |
Octo | TITLE | 0.87+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.84+ |
odo | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
Erez | PERSON | 0.83+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
Check Point Software Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
re:invent 2020 | EVENT | 0.77+ |
2020 | TITLE | 0.74+ |
years ago | DATE | 0.71+ |
once | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
80 billion | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
re:invent | EVENT | 0.71+ |
football | TITLE | 0.69+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
IaaS layer | TITLE | 0.66+ |
of people | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
zero trusts | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.57+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
COVID | ORGANIZATION | 0.52+ |
COVID | TITLE | 0.43+ |
ople | PERSON | 0.35+ |
Russ Currie, NetScout Systems | AWS re:Invent 2020
>> Narrator: From around the globe, It's the Cube. With digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020. Sponsored by Intel, AWS, and our commudity partners. >> Okay, Welcome back. You're ready. Jeff Frick here with the cube. We are, coming to you from our Palo Alto studio with our continuing coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 digital this year, like everything in 2020 but we're excited to welcome back to The Cube. He's been on a number of times, he's Russ Currie. The vice president enterprise strategy for Netscout systems. Russ great to see you. >> Great to see you, Jeff. Thank you. >> Absolutely. So before we jump into there's so(laughs), so many things going on in 2020. What I do want to do is, is reflect back a little bit. You were first on The Cube at AWS reinvent 2017. So it's been about three years. And I remember, one of the lines you had said, I believe that was your guys' first, AWS show as well. So I wonder if you could reflect on kind of how the world has changed in terms of your business, and the importance of AWS and public cloud within the infrastructure systems of your clients. >> Yeah, well, it was interesting, right? We were just getting our feet wet at that point, and had just introduced some of our technology for use in AWS, and it was kind of a interesting little adventure. So we were looking at it and saying, okay where's this going to lead us? And ultimately now we're just really waist deep in it, and really having a great partnership with AWS, and delivering new technologies, new capabilities, and our customer base also is becoming so much more reliant on public cloud in particular AWS and the services that they can provide. So as we've gone and they've gone it's been a journey that we've taken together, and it's been quite, fruitful and exciting. >> Right, right. And it really reinforces this concept of I think you'd mentioned it before, a blended, you know kind of a blended infrastructure approach. So there's a lot of conversations about public cloud, hybrid cloud, multicloud, et cetera, et cetera. But at the, at the end of the day from a customer perspective, as you've mentioned it's really kind of a blended network, right. And it's really application centric, and you put the applications where those applications need to be to be the most appropriate, and that might even change over time from, from test dev to really roll out to, to scale. So you're seeing that consistency. Consistency, >> Absolutely. Yeah. The, the blended environment that in it it's so incredibly complex of our customers. As they take a look at the way that the world has changed, right? When we take a look at what has happened with people working remotely, working from home and having to come into access services in such a, a completely blended and hybrid environment as you say, not only the move to the cloud, but the move to Colo, and bringing all of this together for interconnect, it's definitely a complex environment that they have to have their fingers on the pulse of. Right? >> Yep, yep. And then of course there was this little thing that happened this year with COVID. And really right in March, April timeframe light switch moment, everybody worked from home, whether you're ready or not. And that was a very different kind of situation. Cause we had to get people secure and safe, and get them up and operating. So I'm sure you(laugh) saw a lot of interesting stuff at your business there, but I'm even more interested in how that's evolved over time. Here we are at the end of 2020, there's going to be you know, some version of this for the foreseeable future. And a lot of companies are saying that, you know there'll be a lot of, kind of work from anywhere pieces that continue forward. So again, with your customers and looking kind of the change between what happened in the spring, and now what's happening as they really of kind of put in the systems that'll enable them to continue to support, you know people working from anywhere, not even really working from home, but working from anywhere. >> Right. Exactly. I mean, as our customers had to bring up more connectivity, new connectivity, and start to add licenses for virtual desktop or for their VPN connectivity ultimately how they got it done, most of our customers said, you know we're running hot, but stable. And I think that that was, that was great for most folks. But now they're leaning into it and saying, okay how do we continue to make this happen? And how do we provide the visibility that we need to ensure that the services that we're delivering are, making it possible for their users to be productive and successful. A user doesn't want to feel that they're not contributing as much as someone else that may be able to make it into the office. And, it's a, it's a challenging time, but with that being said, technology has really stepped up, and in particular, the way that they're able to stand up services in the cloud, and the automation, and potential cost savings that they get from standing up in the cloud has really been a bood for most of our users. And some of the users, you know, the high end enterprise that we're a little bit slow to adopt, now are just turning it on as fast as they possibly can. >> Yeah, it's pretty wild. And then, we had another representative from Netscout on earlier this year. One of the, the kind of recurring themes that we've seen is you know, changes in the threat landscape. So clearly the increased attack surfaces as more and more people are working from home. They're not working from the secure environment at the office. But you guys notice some interesting things about what's happening, and we've, we've seen a little bit too in terms of kind of, ransomware and the increase in ransomware as a particular type of attack that, that seems to be growing in popularity. And these, these people are a little bit more thorough in the badness that they caused before they, they throw in the ransom request, and that they're looking for a little bit more fundamental disruption to enable them to basically extract that ransom is which they hope to do. >> Yeah. I mean the amount of DDoS attacks that we've seen has just grown incredibly over the past several months. And these extortion attacks they come in and they often hit the customer quickly and hard, and then say, turn it back for a bit and say, pay us, or we're going to shut you down. And they're really coming in more towards the back office aspects of things. So, going in and attacking that part of the business is kind of a new environment for a lot of folks. But one of the other interesting(laughs) challenges here with us is that, oftentimes those extortion notes don't make it through to the people that really need to act on them because they get caught in spam filters or they like so they're finding these DDoS attacks, and don't necessarily understand that they're under an extortion attack. So it's a real challenge for folks. And we've seen a good uptake with our on-prem capabilities to provide that kind of protection, right at the top of the security stack with our Arbor edge defense products. So it's been something that we're trying to get out there and help our customers as much as we can. And even that new, folks. >> Yeah. It's a, it's an interesting environment. And we found out from somebody too that sometimes if you actually pay the bad guys you can be breaking other rules for doing business with countries >> Yeah. >> Or people that we're not supposed to be doing business with. Like, that's the last thing you need to think about when you're trying to get all your data, and your company back online. >> Right, yeah, I mean, are you trying to make sure that you're keeping yourself stood up right? And, it's tough and you know kind of the rule one is never pay the extortion right? But you kind of got to take a look at it and say, hey, you know, what do I do? >> Right, right. So, you guys been around for a while. I wonder if we could dive in a little bit, we're at reinvent. Some of the things you guys are doing specifically on the product side to, basically increase your, your AWS capabilities. >> Sure. Thanks, yeah. We've been working really closely with AWS as they start to roll out new technologies. Last year, we were fundamental in the VPC ingress routing announcement that they have. We've been working with them with their traffic mirroring capabilities. So technology-wise, we keep in close touch with them in terms of everything that they are delivering. But also on the business side of it, we have our networking competency and just last week got our migration competency. So what we're really doing is, trying to both work the technical and the business relationship, as much as we can to try and expand our overall capabilities of book print with AWS. And, having that visibility and being able to kind of provide that same level of control and capability that you had, on-prem in your enterprise network as you move into the public cloud is a great benefit to a lot of our customers. They really have the ability now, to deliver services the way they have been delivering it for years and years. >> Now, what do you mean specifically, when you say migration competency or networking competency? >> So, they have these different competency programs for their technology partners. And the networking competency is, that you've demonstrated capabilities in your ability to provide network monitoring, or network management capabilities, or network connectivity. In the applica--, migration side you've really provided the ability to show that you have the tools, and solution set to drive, and help people become successful migrations into AWS. As you can imagine right now, a lot of folks are just lifting and shifting, putting stuff into AWS as quickly as they can to try and take advantage of the automation and the operational efficiencies that you get when you move into public cloud settings. As you make those migrations, you want to ensure that you're not either leaving something behind, that needed to move with it, or building a dependency onto something that's in the background that's going to have an adverse effect on, user experience. And ultimately, it really all comes down to the user experience that are, delivering to your customers and or your user base. Right? >> Right. Right. So what are the things you talked about in a prior interview was kind of the shifting dynamic in terms of network traffic. As there's more and more, you know kind of SAS based applications, and there's more kind of an application centric, and in this kind of API interface between all the applications that, you know the North-south is still significant, but the growth in the East-west traffic, meaning, you know kind of inside, if you will. And that some of the unique challenges that come from that from kind of a network monitoring. I wonder if you can share a little bit more color on that, as to, and are you continuing to see this increase in East West relative to North-south, and what kind of special opportunities and challenges that that presents? >> Yeah, absolu--. There is an absolute growth in terms of the East-west connectivity and, traffic that exists out there. In particular, when we take a look at the way that people are implementing software defined networks, NSX, for example NSXT has now provided the ability to blend your environment whether you're going to any cloud, any vendor as you move between these environments having that ability to deliver network services under the same framework is really beneficial to our customer base. And we've also been partnering very closely with VM-ware, and a lot of our customers are implementing VMware cloud on AWS. So, they have that ability to stand up services in a consistent manner whether it be in their legacy environments, or into the public cloud environments, and have that same ability to provide visibility down into the East-west traffic so that you can see that. So when you're part of the NSX framework, what you're able to do is really leverage the service framework that they have the service and search it, and be part of the clusters and host groups that are exchanging traffic East-west. And our ability to see into that really exposes chall--, not, exposes challenges but exposes potential issues that(laughs) our customers might be having in delivering high quality services. So that visibility is really what we've been keying on. >> Right. I'm just curious to get your take, you know as people kind of, as you said, make this move to public cloud, and, you know, you talked about wholesale migrations, and wholesale lifts and shifts. You know, there, there's kind of a couple trains of thought. One is, you know, using cloud for just pure economics, and trying to save money, and the flexibility. The second one is, is to is to add this automation as things grow in this, these great opportunities to automate, and try to reduce air. But the third one, right, the big one is to drive innovation, and to unlock innovation enable better innovation, and speed of delivery, and, you know, moving at the speed of business, pick your favorite buzzword. I'm curious whether your customers, as you have you seen them all jumping in? How much of it is still, you know, to save money or to, or to, you know, kind of use the basic, you know cost saving economics versus people really embracing the opportunity to use this as a method to drive innovation, and change within their own business? >> So I, I think the realities of 2020 have been forcing people to look at primarily from operational and cost efficiency perspectives, however with an eye towards innovation, and as they start to get themselves into a, zone where they're comfortable, they look to see how they can leverage the cloud to provide new services, and new ways in which they provide their services, and avail themselves of, the underlying technologies that are there to build something that's new and exciting in their overall portfolio. So, I think that 2021 is probably going to be a little bit more of where can I innovate as opposed to, how do I get there? (Jeff laughs) >> It's probably an unfair question here at 2020 cause priorities certainly got turned upside down in the middle of the year. So maybe, maybe innovation got pushed down a little bit from, you know, let's get people up, let's get people safe, and let's make sure they can access all the systems and all this crazy stuff that we've got available to them from wherever they are. >> Yeah, yeah. >> Not just within the, within the home office. >> I was listening to a, panel from federal government a couple of weeks ago, and it was really the way the they've adopted kind of commercial cha-- commercial capabilities to meet some of these challenges things that they wouldn't normally look at. But now it's a set of innovation that they're looking at, to try and make sure that they can avail themselves of the services that are out there and available in the public cloud. >> Yeah. Well, that's great, Russ. It's great to catch up. I'm sure you must be as amazed as anybody as the rapid acceleration of this, you know since the short time you went to your first re-invent and, >> Yeah. >> And clearly AWS and Amazon generally is an execution we're seeing. So, I think they'll keep doing it. So I think you're, you're probably sitting in a good spot. >> I think so. (Jeff laughs) Thank you. (Russ laughs) >> All right. Thank you Russ for, for stopping by and sharing your insight. Look forward to catching up next time. >> Thanks a lot, Jeff. Really appreciate it. >> Alrighty. He's Russ, I'm Jeff. You're watching The Cube's, continuous coverage of AWS reinvent 2020, the virtual event. Thanks for watching and we'll see you next time. (bright music)
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube. coming to you from our Palo Alto studio Great to see you, Jeff. one of the lines you had said, in particular AWS and the and you put the applications not only the move to the cloud, and looking kind of the change and the automation, and the increase in ransomware going to shut you down. pay the bad guys Like, that's the last thing Some of the things you and being able to kind of the ability to show that And that some of the unique and have that same ability to and the flexibility. and as they start to in the middle of the year. Not just within the, and available in the public cloud. as the rapid acceleration of this, AWS and Amazon generally is I think so. Look forward to catching up next time. Thanks a lot, Jeff. the virtual event.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Russ | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Russ Currie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Netscout | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NetScout Systems | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
third one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Colo | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
end of 2020 | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about three years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
April | DATE | 0.94+ |
VPC ingress | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
NSXT | TITLE | 0.88+ |
second one | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
earlier this year | DATE | 0.85+ |
couple of weeks ago | DATE | 0.83+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.83+ |
The Cube | TITLE | 0.81+ |
The Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.78+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
rule one | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
The Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.66+ |
Invent 2020 | EVENT | 0.66+ |
NSX | TITLE | 0.65+ |
past | DATE | 0.54+ |
months | DATE | 0.53+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.51+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.5+ |
Arbor | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
2020 | TITLE | 0.41+ |
reinvent | EVENT | 0.4+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.3+ |
Kelly Herod, Deloitte Consulting LLP | AWS re:Invent 2020
>> Announcer: From around the globe. It's theCUBE with digital coverage of AWS re:Invent 2020, sponsored by Intel, AWS and our community partners. (upbeat music) >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today with our ongoing coverage of AWS re:Invent 2020. It's a virtual event, like all the events in 2020, but we've been going there since 2013. We're happy to be back this year and we're excited to have for the first time on theCUBE, our next guest, she's Kelly Herod the US SAP Offering Leader for Deloitte Consulting. Kelly, great to see you. >> Great to see you as well, Jeff, thanks so much for having me. >> Absolutely, so first time on, on theCUBE, you guys have a really interesting concept at Deloitte, you call it the Kinetic Enterprise. What is the Kinetic Enterprise all about? >> Yes. So if you think about the past, organizations built their technology infrastructures to be what we would call built to last, the future though is all about built to evolve. And that's exactly what the Kinetic Enterprise is. It's really how we're helping our clients create the right technology infrastructures that evolve with their business. And Kinetic Enterprise is focused on four key pillars. The first, that we're building a technology solution that's clean. That means we want to have reduced amount of custom code or things that we may have built that really rack up your technical debt. The second pillar is that it's intelligent. So we're leveraging all of the technologies, artificial intelligence, machine learning, to really automate and change the way in which an organization runs their business. The third pillar is that it's responsive, and that means it's on the cloud and this is where AWS comes in. And then the last pillar is that it's inclusive. So it uses all of the technologies and microservices available to really optimize and achieve a company's business value objectives. >> So that is a great summary, and I've got the list of the four pillars. It's just interesting you lead with clean. You know, there's a lot of conversation about digital transformation and move fast and be dynamic, you know, would be kind of an opposite to static. But clean, interesting choice of words. It runs with core... Core clean ERP with minimum technical debt. Why clean is such an important thing? I get kind of intelligent and responsive, but clean is an interesting attribute to pick. >> Absolutely, so if you take a step back and think... (Kelly hangs) when comes to ERPs, when ERPs came out, there was... (Kelly hangs) how you're going to run your entire organization on this one solution. What we've found is that as companies have put ERPs, they've gone through and created so much customization, that it's that which makes it very difficult to be able to keep up with technology changes or actually migrate to the next versions. So the concept here is if you're going to go in and put in brand new ERP, such as an SAP S/4HANA, this time around in order to achieve the promise of ERPs, let's make it clean. Let's stick to as much standard functionality as possible within the core, and then we innovate on the edges. And so that will allow us in the future to maintain that flexibility or dynamicism of a Kinetic Enterprise. >> Right. So I have to tease you Kelly 'cause SAP R/3 and ERP is not necessarily synonymous with digital transformation, speed, agility, and embracing change. So you've been involved in Deloitte's SAP practice for a long time. Why should people start to rethink about SAP in terms of being responsive, in terms of being able to change quickly and to your vocabulary, more kinetic? >> And you're right. You know, I've been doing SAP for 20 years. So I actually did start back in the R/3 days. And, you know, I would just say that things are changing, is evolving. You know, SAP themselves has been going through a transformation, a revolution. You look at the ERP landscape as a whole, all of the ERP players are moving to the cloud. The technology is the backbones are changing. Now the reality is, you know, going in and actually changing out your ERP, no matter what solution you're using, it's a big endeavor or undertaking. The goal here, and why we're partnering with SAP, partnering with AWS is really focused on how can we make this more efficient for our clients? More importantly, I like to think about it as how can we make this less of a one and done, and more of a let's keep transforming the technologies and the business as things are changing in the market, along the way. And using technologies to even change how we implement, allows us to do that. >> So, Kelly, another thing a lot of people probably don't think of is SAP and AWS, together in the same sentence. So I'm sure there's a lot of people that are much more intelligent about this, but for those that aren't as familiar, tell us a little bit about the relationship with SAP and AWS and then how you guys are leveraging that at Deloitte. >> Absolutely. So when you... There's a couple of things that I would bring up. One is SAP S/4HANA solutions, in particular, but any SAP environment that you're running on, one of the objectives most of our clients are focused on is how to move to the cloud, and that's where AWS comes in. You can absolutely run any of your SAP solutions on AWS. And what that brings you with is more flexibility, so that you can actually scale or contract your infrastructure that you're running SAP on based on your business needs. The second thing that we've been partnering with AWS to do is a little bit of what I just mentioned, which was a teaser around, how do you change the way you even go about implementing an SAP solution or start to migrate your business? So one of the things we asked ourselves was, could we radically change how you jumpstart an S/4 implementation? And what we decided to do is team up with AWS and leveraging machine learning, artificial intelligence, most importantly, standing up an environment on AWS. We actually created what we call Kinetic Finance Startup. Many of our clients are choosing to start with finance and specifically SAP central finance to begin their journey to the new S/4HANA environment. And what we've been able to do is create a touchless build solution, so over a weekend, we can actually connect to your existing ERP solution. Majority of those is starting with an ECC environment. We can extract the data, we can use harmonization rules to actually change and modify your data and optimize it for the future. And then we actually through completely touchless built-in automation, stand up a brand new AWS environment with S/4HANA on it and actually automate the configuration and testing of the basic financial transactions. So when you come in the next week and we start the conversation with the client, we're actually looking at a real life S/4HANA system on AWS with their mas... >> Oh, that's... >> So the whole concept is to change how we engage. >> Right. So again, I don't know that I were to think of finance as kind of a lead application, to start this journey. I mean, I can see on one hand, it is the system of record and it, you know, it has a lot of very important information that's got to eventually get into finance. On the other hand, it seems like there's less critical, maybe lower hanging fruit that's less risky. Is it because you can run it kind of in a parallel path for some period of time, but it strikes me that finance might not be the first place you go to look for some early wins. >> It's actually what you just said about the parallelism. So the reason we've seen that finance actually was one of the starting points is even if you look at the history of SAP's S/4HANA solution, way back before we got to that, it started with a concept called smart accounting or simple finance. And the theory here is, you could actually... If a company has, let's say multiple ERPs, as most do, you can actually grab the financial information, bring it into a new S/4 or central finance environment, and actually combine or merge the accounting information to get improved reporting, optimize a shared service organization. So it's actually a lower risk way to start the journey before going and touching the heart of the business or core operations, or manufacturing, for example, >> That's pretty interesting. So you run it in parallel for a while and then eventually does, is the plan that it takes over, from the old. So it is effectively kind of, I guess, a slightly delayed lift and shift, or maybe it's a reassemble and then a flip. I don't know how you would describe it because it's not really lift and shift. >> It's not really lift and shift actually, you have two options. You can either over time pull all of your business processes out of the underlying ERP solutions and bring them into the S/4HANA environment or multiple S/4HANA environments. Or some companies may choose to continue to... (Kelly hangs) Especially if you're in an industry where you do a lot of acquisitions or divestitures, you may not have an intention of ever combining all of your ERPs, but you may want to change each of them to S/4HANA underneath, and then have one environment in which you're pulling your data together to really consolidate your financial reporting. >> That's great. I want to follow up on something that you mentioned, which is the use of machine learning and artificial intelligence. And we talk a lot about, right? Those are hot buzzwords all over the place, but, you know, I'm pretty vehement in that, you know, general purpose AI and ML is kind of interesting, but where the real interesting stuff ends is where the rubber hits the road, is in applied. And it sounds like you've got a pretty interesting application where you're applying this technology to help make this move to cloud go a little bit smoother. >> Yes. One of the areas, you know, since we've been talking a bit about finance then I'll use it as an example. Is if you think about it, whenever we go in and we're typically working with... (Kelly hangs) especially in finance, you know, one of the topics is, how to optimize a chart of accounts? So over time we've done this hundreds of times, if we can look at different sectors, different industries, we can use benchmark chart of accounts. So instead of making this a paper-based exercise that individuals are doing, why not take that and actually use artificial intelligence machine learning to create data harmonization rules, so that technologies can actually do that same work. And so that's been one of the things we've been working on that I personally find very interesting just in my finance background. >> Right. And is this a relatively new thing, or have you guys been doing this for a while? >> Actually, it's something that over the last 12 months, we've been focused on building out in partnership with AWS. So it's fairly new. >> That's great. I want... I'd love to shift gears a little bit, and talk about COVID, and the impact of COVID on your business. Clearly in March, right? It was the light switch moment and everybody had to work from home and it was a quick rush to make sure that everybody was safe and we could support our remote workers, that said, can't help with the ba... All the bad stuff that's happening in hospitality and travel, and a whole lot of other industries. So that aside and that's bad stuff. In the tech industry, we were able to make the move, but now we know we're six, seven, eight months into this thing, and it's clear that, you know, we're going to have many elements of this going forward for a while. So I'm curious just from your business and your customer point of view, if you can share, you know, kind of the contrast of what happened in March and April to what you're seeing now and how this new reality, whatever this new reality is going to be, as we, you know, continue to evolve is impacting this digital transformation conversations? >> It is interesting. So if I pivot back to March, when this all occurred, you know, it truly did feel an instant going from in-person. And as consultants we travel and typically have a Monday through Thursday, or Monday through Friday type of travel schedule to an instant working from home overnight. And, you know, I'm really proud of our teams and how they seamlessly made that transition. Many, including myself, were actually leading clients through final cut overs in parallel to this happening. And we were able to really pivot and make those shifts, and I was reflecting with one of the executives I worked with, you know, she and I, you know, six months later, we're looking back at how we did that and how impressed we were with what the team pulled off. And since then, they've been able to do several other go lives, which is great. But I think that it was something we had to do quickly. I think many would have said it couldn't have been done that you would see the whole world move to a working from home environment, but we did. What it tells me is it gives me a lot of hope for a lot of the things that businesses can do in the future. In the past we used to constrain ourselves of, Oh, there's no way we could ever get XYZ done, or we can't make this type of change in the world, but we can. If I flash forward to now, I think we're very settled in kind of this new way of working, but I'm also hopeful for what the future is going to look like. I don't believe it will be a pivot all the way back to... Especially for consultants traveling on a regular basis of Monday through Friday. Instead, I think we're going to create models that give people and organizations the flexibility they need to really balance some of their personal responsibilities along with their work responsibilities. My hope and expectations is that also opens up options so that all organizations have access to more talent that they may not have had before. And I think that also means global talent. I think we're showing we can work as global teams, which means, you know, I could now have members from Japan joining, you know, my permanent leadership team in ways that I maybe never have thought of before. Those are just some examples of what I expect and hope for all of us that we'll see coming out of this. >> Hopefully and I know... Like you said, you've been a consultant for years and years and years, and you guys spend lots of time on airplanes, and hopefully you don't have to spend quite so much time on airplanes because you don't necessarily have to be there all the time. But you talked about an interesting thing and that's talent and opening up the opportunity to get more talent that maybe you wouldn't have ever considered. And along those same lines, right? Is the move in diversity and inclusion. And I just watched a show that you did a few months ago, called the... "A Chance for Change: Accelerating Business Recovery, Through Gender Diversity," on a Facebook interview, very cool panel, really enjoyed it. And I want to follow up on some of those things, 'cause you've made some really simple and poignant points. And one of the things that you said definitively, go back to the wide diverse talent and perspective equals winning in business, period. I love that. You know, we hear this all the time that, you know, not only is it the right thing to do, but it's also good for business. And isn't it nice when those two things can actually line up. And you just talked about, you know, in more of a generic sense, the ability to open up your talent window when there's a worldwide talent shortage, both for geography, but also the work in diversity and inclusion and to continue to hold the momentum that continues to build in this area. I wonder if you could, you know, kind of share your thoughts on that, and your position and what's going on with Deloitte. >> Absolutely. You know, I do think this is one of those key pivotal moments for all of us, and I believe we have, coming out of this an option to really move the needle on our diversity and inclusion, and equality efforts. You know, one example I think about women, women in leadership positions. You know, being in consulting, you know, one of the challenges has always been that we do travel a lot, and it can be difficult to balance all the responsibilities, professional and personally. I think with a move to more flexible work arrangements, less travel, or travel for purpose is what I would highlight for the future. I think it opens the door to many more women being able to have careers in consulting, if that's what they, you know, had desired. I also think it allows them to have... You know, spend their entire careers in consulting and in ways we never saw before. And that means you'll see as significant movement and women in leadership positions. I also think this applies to underrepresented minorities. I hope that from all of this, instead of there may be companies that focus on recruiting from, you know, schools that are local to them or within their surrounding areas. I think this gives us an opportunity to really open that aperture up and look at talent from any school or university, or geography, and being able to get the right skill sets in the door and the right talent. Therefore you can actually see movement and diversity within teams, as well as at the leadership levels for URMs. >> Right. Right. And really managing to the right things too. I think that's the other thing that's coming out of this, and we've had a lot of conversations on work from home or work from anywhere. You guys are a little bit different than the consultant 'cause your team is there, usually local at the client site for some period of time. But for a lot of people, it's the first time they are not sitting across from a desk or, you know, within close proximity. Now you too, in your teams. And so, the shift changes that now you have to judge output, (Jeff chuckles) and not activity. And you would think that that would be a great and easy thing to execute, but we're hearing more and more that it's not necessarily. And you really highlighted, I think, three leadership traits that are always important, but more important now than ever before in that other interview. And I just want to call them out 'cause I thought it was worth calling out. You know, empathy has never been more important. Resilience, and my favorite one you said at the end, calm in the storm. I just wonder again, if you could share, you know, kind of, as you've gone through it, both, you know, as somebody at Deloitte within the greater Deloitte group, but then also in managing your own teams, to maintain that calm in the storm and to maintain, you know, empathetic leadership, because I think you've said it before, right? This is a personal challenge that we're all going through. We all have different things going on at home, whether it's the spouses working, the kids are doing homeschool. People are taking care of older parents, this and that. It's a real personal thing, and so these leadership characteristics, these softer leadership characteristics have never been more important >> That's so true. And, you know, when I think about the empathy part, right now what we're going through is also about how is each of us as leaders also sharing a bit more about how we're experiencing this? I think the sharing of stories is what also helps many on the teams adapt, adjust. The reality is when you're working on camera all day and, you know, in the past, imagine that you maybe were having a tough day or you weren't feeling that great, you weren't on camera all day with every one of your coworkers. You we're actually, you know, sitting in an office, you may have to go to the conference room to do some meetings, but you didn't look... (Kelly hangs) like someone was kind of staring at you all day long. Now, when we're working from home virtually and we're on Zoom or Skype or WebEx, et cetera, all day, it does feel like you're under the lights when you're on camera. And there's a lot of pressure and people are trying to figure out how to manage their own emotions while doing that. And, you know, my message would say as an empathetic leader, it's okay for you to also share when you might be having a tough go that day. Maybe one of your children has been kind of acting out and they didn't really want to do the virtual school. It's okay to share in that because everyone's going through it, and it makes us all more human. >> Right. >> And it makes us all more connected. >> Right. Well, I will share with you a pro tip, we've done a few of these interviews and it is okay to let people turn off the camera. And I think as a manager, I think it's actually an okay thing to say, okay, everyone, let's just turn off our cameras and get a break from that camera that's got that eye on you all the time, because it is just another, you know, kind of a factor that we have to deal with. Well, go ahead. >> And I was going to ask, what do you actually, you know, I don't know what one of your techniques is, but I know mine is some of the meetings, it's actually just go back to traditional telephone calls (Jeff chuckles) and actually even just being on your cell, put on your air, you know, your earbuds, or your headphones and even walk. >> Right. >> So I think the other thing we're all missing is actually that movement, the steps to go to the coffee maker and back, or to lunch and back, we don't have them anymore. So you've got to work extra hard, actually getting those extra steps in calories and just mental breaks at times. >> Yeah, well then there's a whole another tranche on walking during meetings. And I used have a boss that I would only do one-on-ones while we took a walk. He always says, I get in there... 'Cause then there's, you know, you're not necessarily looking at each other. And if there's some sensitive things or tough conversations, sometimes it's easier if you're not just looking across the table at one another with all the silence. So there's a lot to be said for that as well. Well, Kelly, I really enjoyed this conversation and getting to meet you for the first time. It sounds like you're doing a lot of cool and exciting things and, you know, exciting speed and innovation with SAP, that's noble work and I'm sure a lot of people are really happy to have you help them out there. So thank you very much for your time and to have a great AWS re:Invent. >> Thanks, Jeff. It was great to discuss this with you. >> Absolutely. All right. She's Kelly, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE's ongoing coverage of AWS re:Invent 2020. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Announcer: From around the globe. We're coming to you from Great to see you as well, Jeff, What is the Kinetic Enterprise all about? and that means it's on the cloud and move fast and be dynamic, you know, and then we innovate on the edges. So I have to tease you Now the reality is, you know, and then how you guys are so that you can actually scale to change how we engage. be the first place you go is even if you look at the history I don't know how you would describe it but you may want to change each of them something that you mentioned, One of the areas, you know, or have you guys been that over the last 12 months, and the impact of COVID on your business. the future is going to look like. the time that, you know, and it can be difficult to and to maintain, you know, imagine that you maybe and it is okay to let and actually even just being on your cell, the steps to go to the and exciting things and, you know, It was great to discuss this with you. We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Kelly | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Deloitte | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
April | DATE | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kelly Herod | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
S/4HANA | TITLE | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second pillar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
A Chance for Change: Accelerating Business Recovery, Through Gender Diversity | TITLE | 0.99+ |
third pillar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Deloitte Consulting | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Kelly Herod | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months later | DATE | 0.98+ |
four pillars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
eight months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
next week | DATE | 0.98+ |
two options | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.97+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
SAP S/4HANA | TITLE | 0.97+ |
four key pillars | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ | |
SAP | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
SAP R/3 | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Skype | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.94+ |
hundreds of times | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Saunak "Jai" Chakrabarti, Spotify | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2020
from around the globe it's thecube with coverage of kubecon and cloudnativecon north america 2020 virtual brought to you by red hat the cloud native computing foundation and ecosystem partners hey welcome back everybody jeff frick here with thecube coming to you from our palo alto studios with our ongoing coverage of kubecon cloud nativecon north america 2020 virtual it's virtual like everything else that we're doing in 2020 we're really excited by our next guest we're going to dive into a company that you probably know a little bit on the surface but probably don't know a lot of the stuff that's going on behind the surface so we're really excited to have our next guest he is jai chakrabarti he is the director of engineering for core infrastructure at spotify jai great to see you great to be here with you today so as a as a long-standing uh spotify fan and and customer and premium customer and family playing customer just so there's no question i'm a big fan the infrastructure to deliver what i want to hear basically any sound any song from the entire world it seems like i don't know what the actual uh percentage of every published song you guys have you know kind of at my fingertips searchable available now to listen to is an amazing accomplishment i can't imagine how big and significant and complicated the infrastructure you guys must be managing and and not only that but kind of the meteoric growth over the last several years so first off just talk a little bit about spotify scale how you guys think about it is there some things that you can share to help people really understand you know some of the some of the big iron that's behind giving me the songs i want to hear absolutely and thank you for the opportunity to let me talk about this so it's a as you say it's a pretty mammoth project to be able to deliver just about any song that's in the world or now any podcast that you might want to listen to to hundreds of millions of fans and also enable creators to be able to share their content with the consumers who are interested in consuming that content so some of the metrics that go behind us are we have thousands of microservices running in production we were one of the early adopters of microservices at scale and continued to build on that foundation with early entrants to dockerize services and now of course largely on kubernetes we also have thousands of data pipelines hundreds of uh websites as well as micro app features and we're doing about 20 000 deployments a day to give you kind of a scale of how fast things are changing and for us speed is a great virtue as we're testing out features doing ab tests and trying to roll out the next best thing for the audio network it's amazing and i'm and i'm curious in terms of execution on the business side i mean clearly you're in many many countries you know you're global are all the licensing agreements for the music different by country are you just like super micromanaging um you know kind of the the revenue streams and the licensing by geo or is is that just as complex as it feels like it might be or is there some some simplicity or some scale that you can bring to uh to bring a little bit of of clarification there yeah so that is an area of complexity as well um so you know licensing across the broad set of content that we have as well as the number of publishers and creators that we have to make sure that everything is well accounted for is also kind of a source of complexity in our organizational makeup and then and then the the piece that i don't think a lot of people know is you guys are huge consumers and contributors back to open source and clearly we're here at q con cloud native con you've talked already about kubernetes and containers but i wonder before we get into some of the specifics if you can talk about philosophically the role of open source and why you know you guys are such a big open source company versus kind of back in the old days when you would have a lot of proprietary technology that you would try to develop and keep in-house as part of the as part of the secret sauce yeah thank you for that question so philosophically we are big proponents of open source we believe in giving back to the community we believe that when we as a community come together to solve these problems at scale the end result is much better than if we were to try it alone if any one company were to try it alone so some of the projects that we've contributed or invested a lot of time in are envoy for example which we use to power our perimeter at spotify or kubernetes which we use for deployment purposes as many companies do but there are also a number of other open source projects that we're committing to so for example with cloud bigtable we have produced an auto scaler that's now fairly widely used to be able to manage costs better with cloud bigtable we've also invested in a open source time series database called heroic to manage millions of data points for a metrics platform and scales so those are just a few examples but philosophically we believe this isn't something that we want to do alone and we want to leverage and do this together with the community right another one that you didn't mention there but you've talked about i want to dig into is backstage and as you mentioned you have a lot of developer teams working on a lot of projects like i saw a statistic maybe in github of the number of of github projects you guys are working on it's a it's a lot so what is backstage all about give us the story there yeah so at spotify we have almost somewhere around 500 engineering teams and so you can think about backstage as kind of like a central nervous system to be able to help engineers interface across the wide landscape that is spotify's engineering ecosystems so if you're an engineer you can go into backstage and you can manage your services your data pipelines your micro features you can see what other teams are doing what the organizational structure is you can get recommendations and insights on your tech health so you can see where you might need to invest more time and get some recommendations on how to get back to the blessed stock so it's really a one-stop developer portal that engineers spend the bulk of their time in today we open sourced it uh earlier this year and we've been absolutely thrilled with the response we've gotten thus far a number of companies have already started using it and contributing back so we've seen you know a lot of contributions coming back to backstage which is of course one of the ideas to be able to get some of the great ideas uh on backstage so we're really excited about that and specifically within backstage something that my team has just released into the open is a product called cost insights so one of the problems that we were dealing with at spotify is how do we sustainably look at cloud costs but do it in a way that isn't like a compliance exercise isn't a focus on traditional top top down cost controls but really taps into developers innate desire to work on optimization because all of us who come from an engineering background know that optimization is fun at the same time premature optimization is the root of all evil as the saying goes and so what we've done within our cost insights product and backstage is really try to find a good balance between engineering love for optimization and letting people know what are the areas where cloud spend really matters so if making an investment here isn't going to move the needle for us we let people know that this isn't worth your time to worry about so let me unpack you touch on a couple things first off you talked about it gives you an assessment of your engineering health so does that mean that it's kind of uh compliance within a standard is that looking for i guess not quite red flags yet but yellow flags of things that that are known potential issues down the road is it you know tapping into maybe higher cost services or microservices versus less that maybe there's a less expensive way so so how do you define health and how do you you know keep track of people getting away from health and then you know steering them back to being more healthy yeah that's a great question so we have this concept at spotify called golden state which is a reflection of how far away are you from all of the blessed frameworks libraries that we recommend to engineers and the way we think about golden state is there ought to be clear value adds to going to a new service a new library version and so the way we try to express it is unless of course there's a kind of a direct security concern and there aren't really too many ways to get around that but we really tried to preserve engineering autonomy and say if you go to this new framework for example you're going to save this much time on average so the recommendations that you'll find there are going to be highly specific so for example if you adopt uh you know an auto scaler for bigtable you're going to save this much time and spend this much less that's in general how we phrase these things okay and then on the cost insights i mean clearly when a dev is working on a new feature or new uh you know experimenting maybe with a bunch of new features and you're you're setting up multiple a b testing this and that are they are they not really working worrying about cost at the front end of that or is really kind of the cost optimization and you mentioned you know don't optimize too early does that come kind of after the fact and after you've you know moved some new things into production they have potential and now we do maybe a second order kind of analysis of the appropriateness of that feature because i imagine if they're just if you're just trying to come up with new features and exploring and trying new things not really worrying about the you're not worrying about the cloud bill right you're just trying to get some feature functionality and make sure you don't have too many bugs and make sure you're going to get some good client value and some new customer experience yeah yeah no and and we agree with that perspective so we think about the world in terms of startup scale-ups and mature businesses at spotify so there are a lot of teams who are experimenting with new ideas that fall into the startup category and by and large they are not going to be worrying about costs that being said we as infrastructure teams have the notice on us to think about how do we provide shared services and frameworks that abstract away a lot of these questions around how do you properly manage your costs right so that that is on us as infrastructure teams but really our perspective is for startups to move as quickly as they can and really if that's an idea that's viable and you get to what we call the scale-up stage or you get to the mature business stage where it really is a core part of our business then that's where you know you might start to get some nudges or recommendations and cost insights so interesting so i'd love to you know your background you came from financial services and trading where clearly speed matters accuracy matters you know that that's i mean basically financial services is is a software game at this stage of the game and it's a speed game and i saw another interesting uh video getting ready for this i think it was with gustav soderstrom talking about the competitive advantage of the early days really being speed and speed to return a result and speed to start that stream and it just struck me very much like you know the early days of google which was that was their whole speed thing and they even told you how fast you got a return on your search when you're thinking about optimizing now with the huge suite of features and functionalities that you have how do you think about speed is it still speed number one how is kind of the priority changed and what are some of the design priorities that when things go from experiment to start to be into the scale realm and hopefully be successful in production that that need to be thought about and potentially rank ordered um in in the proper way yeah yeah that's it's a great question and so you know i'll just refer to daniel x quote around this which is we aim to fail faster than anyone else and so for us as a company and with our growth trajectory and investing in the areas that we are looking to invest into it's still absolutely critical that we move fast that we get the ideas of the startup phase out to be vetted and validated if we can go to the next phase to the scale-up phase so i see that just as important today if not more than when i first joined spotify uh you know over four years ago at this point and regarding financial services um there are certainly you know touch points in terms of the amount of data that we're processing and the scale of technology that it requires to process that kind of data but one of the things that i really love about spotify of course is that we get to move fast which is sometimes of course going to be a lot more difficult when you're talking about the financial service arena and various uh compliance bodies that are overseeing any changes that you might make yeah you guys are you guys were running a little bit ahead of the regs i think which is pretty typical uh in the music business napster was running a little bit ahead of the regs and you know then we saw the evolution with the itunes and then you know you guys really really nailing the streaming service really for the first time and and opening up this new con consumption bottle and i wonder if you could talk about you know kind of keeping the customer experience first and making sure that that's a positive thing i can't help but think of of the netflix experience where they spend so much time on people's interaction with the application to to get them to try new things a recommendation engine such an important piece of the of the puzzle and i think what you guys have really nailed is the discovery piece because it's one thing to be able to quickly access a favorite song and be able to listen to it but everyone loves discovery right and discovery is kind of an interesting and interesting process and you guys have taken a really scientific approach in terms of cataloging music and and different attributes of music and then using those to help drive the recommendation engine i wonder if you can share you know kind of your thoughts in terms of being you know kind of ultimately driven by the customer experience and their interaction with the application and these things called you know music or podcast which is such a such a a a very personal thing to interact with yeah so from the perspective of core infrastructure you know it's spotify our goal is to really enable the scale in which we are processing the amount of audio content that goes through our system and so podcast of course is a new category that wasn't there when i originally joined spotify but it's really to provide a platform so these experiments can be done seamlessly so we can have different ways of looking at discovery looking at user segmentation and being able to come up with new ways that are going to be compelling to our customers so that's very exciting and fulfilling for us to be able to provide that platform by which our sister teams can iterate very quickly knowing that they have the guard rails uh which you know in our on-premise days at times was a struggle and where we're in a very different place now yeah so last question before i let you go we're at cubecon cloudnativecon um and and it's just an interesting thing that i always think about when you're managing engineering teams that are heavily open source participants and you know it's such a big piece now of of a lot of engineers motivation to be active participants in open source and to and to show their work to others outside the company but at the same time they have to get company work done so i just wonder if you could share your perspective of how do you manage open source contributions how do you keep them you know working on company projects but also make sure you allocate time and priorities to open source contributions because that is a really important piece of the motivation for a lot of engineers it's not just working for the company and getting paid at the india at the end of every two weeks yeah it's a key motivation as you say and it's key to our recruiting strategy and also how we think about retaining engineers and spotify so there are different mechanisms that we use and there's a lot of focus that's modified on coming up with development plans for engineers that actually make sense um so you know i would say that all the way from the oft quoted 20 time is something that you might hear at spotify where you have engineers who are working on open source 20 of the time or you might see a variety of customized customized options depending on who the engineer is where they want to grow and really i think the key here is providing the right support structures so even if you have the time are you getting the mentorship are you getting the right kind of support system so you know how to connect with the community and so you have other like-minded people who are bouncing ideas and you don't feel like you're doing it yourself so that's something that i feel really excited about that we've grown those support structures over the last few years eyes have also been very intentional about giving engineers time to work on open source and you give them as much as 20 i'd never heard that before yeah in some cases some i mean if that is what where an engineer really wants to focus and grow there are a number of folks at spotify who are spending up to 20 of their time on open source wow that's amazing that that is a uh that's a it's just it's such a great commitment for the company to the engineer if that's their priority and then everyone's going to benefit from it both the engineer the company as well as the community so really a forward-looking you know point of view to take that long-term view versus the you know maybe we should only give them 10 we're losing 10 of their time working on a project so that is super super progressive and i'm sure you must be seeing great roi on it or you wouldn't continue to be such huge proponents of open source and such huge contributors back so that's that's a great story yeah terrific i mean you know we we want those contributions to be in line with where we're growing as a company and we see a lot of opportunities uh where that is happening so like envoy or kubernetes um just to name a couple of examples where folks have devoted time in those areas well thanks for uh thanks for sharing some of the the story behind the scenes you know again household name what what a tremendous success story and and and uh you know i'm a movie customer so i'm definitely a customer though no no doubt about it so uh thank you for your contributions congrats to the team and uh and really loved the story of how you guys are contributing back and and doing a lot more than just making great music available to us all and a great channel for uh for creators to get their stuff out there so thanks again thanks so much for your time i really appreciate it all right he's jai i'm jeff you're watching the cube's continuing coverage of kubecon cloud nativecon north america 2020 thanks for watching we'll see you next [Music] time you
**Summary and Sentiment Analysis are not been shown because of improper transcript**
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
spotify | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
jai chakrabarti | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
jeff frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
hundreds of millions of fans | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
cubecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
hundreds of uh websites | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Spotify | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
palo alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
daniel | PERSON | 0.97+ |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.96+ |
CloudNativeCon | EVENT | 0.96+ |
earlier this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
gustav soderstrom | PERSON | 0.96+ |
second order | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
thousands of microservices | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
github | TITLE | 0.95+ |
india | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
about 20 000 deployments a day | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
one company | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ | |
around 500 engineering teams | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
golden state | TITLE | 0.87+ |
jeff | PERSON | 0.87+ |
cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
north america | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
q con cloud native con | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
every two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
up to 20 | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
kubernetes | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
NA 2020 | EVENT | 0.82+ |
over four years ago | DATE | 0.82+ |
millions of data points | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
lot of projects | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
thousands of data | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
last several years | DATE | 0.78+ |
golden state | TITLE | 0.77+ |
last few years | DATE | 0.75+ |
kubecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
couple things | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
every | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
a number of companies | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
one of the | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
one of the things | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
cloudnativecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
one of the problems | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
Saunak "Jai | PERSON | 0.64+ |
Chakrabarti | PERSON | 0.63+ |
jai | PERSON | 0.62+ |
much | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
number of folks | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
lot of teams | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.59+ |
kubecon | EVENT | 0.57+ |
many ways | QUANTITY | 0.57+ |
one- | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
nes | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
lot | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
cloud | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.53+ |
uh | ORGANIZATION | 0.51+ |
Ken Owens, Mastercard | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2020
>> Presenter: From around the globe, it's theCUBE, with coverage of KubeCon and CloudNativeCon North America 2020 Virtual. Brought to you by Red Hat, the Cloud Native Computing Foundation and ecosystem partners. >> Hey, welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're coming to you from our Palo Alto Studios with our ongoing coverage of KubeCon + CloudNativeCon 2020, the digital version. It would have been the North American version but obviously everything is digital. So we're excited, we've been coming back here for years and we've got a founder of CNCF and also a practitioner, really great opportunity to get some insight from someone who's out in the field and putting this stuff into work. So we're joined in this next segment by Ken Owens. He is the Vice President of Software Development Engineering for MasterCard, and he's a founding member of the CNCF, The Cloud Native Computing Foundation. Ken, great to see you. >> Yeah, great. Thank you for having me, I have, I've enjoyed theCUBE over the years and I'm glad to be a part of it again. >> Yeah, so we're, we're psyched to have you on, and I think it's the first time I've got to talk to you. I think you might've been on in LA a couple of years ago, or I was kind of drifting around that show. I don't think I was a it was on the set that day, but before we jump into kind of what's going on now, you were a founding member of CNCF. So let's take a step back and kind of share your perspective as to kind of where we are now from where this all began and kind of this whole movement around Cloud Native. Certainly it's a good place to be. >> Yeah, yeah definitely. It's been a great ride. In our industry, we go through these sort of timeframes every decade or so, where something big kind of comes along and you get involved in and you participate in it. And it gets to be a lot of fun and it either dies or it evolves into something else, right? And with CloudNativeCon Cloud Native itself, this concept of just how difficult it was to really move with the type of agility and the type of speed that developers in the enterprise really need to move at. It was just, it was hard to get there with just traditional infrastructure, traditional ways of doing configurations of doing management of infrastructure and it really needed something different and something to kind of help, it was called orchestration of course but at the time we didn't know it was called orchestration right. We knew we needed things like service mesh, but they weren't called service meshes then. There were more like control planes. And how do you, how do you custom create all of these different pieces? And the great thing about the CNCF is that we, when we started it, we had very simple foundational principles we wanted to follow right. One was, we wanted to have end users involved. A lot of foundations as become very vendor-driven and very vendor-centric. And you kind of lose your, your core base of the practitioners as you call us right? The guys who actually need to solve problems they're trying to make a living solving problems for the industry, not just for selling products, right? And so it was important that we get those end users involved and that, and that's probably the biggest changes. It's a great technology body. We had great technologists, great engineers and the foundation but we also have a huge over 150 end users that have engaged and been very involved and contributing to the end users things of the community, contributing to the foundation now. And it's been awesome to see that come to fruition over the last three years. >> Yeah, it certainly part of the magic of open source, that's been so, so transformative. And we've seen that obviously with servers and Linux and what what that did, but we've been talking a lot lately too about kind of the anniversary of the of the Agile Manifesto and kind of the Agile Movement and really changing the prioritization around change and really making change a first class citizen as opposed to kind of a nightmare I don't want to deal with and really building systems and ways of doing things that adopt that. I want to just to pull up the Cloud Native definition 'cause I think it's interesting. We talk about Cloud Native a lot and you guys actually wrote some words down and I think it's worth reading them that Cloud Native Technologies empower organizations to build and run scalable applications in dynamic environments. Dynamic environments is such a key piece to this puzzle because it used to be, this is your infrastructure person, you've got to build something that fits into this. Now with an app-centric world has completely flipped over and the application developer doesn't have to worry about the environment anymore, right? It's spin it up and make it available to me when I need it. A really different way of thinking about things than kind of this static world. >> Definitely and then that was the big missing piece for all those years was how do you get to this dynamic environment, right, that embraces change and embraces risk to some extent. Not risk like you heard in the past with risk avoidance is so important to have, right. It's really more, how do you embrace risk and fail earlier in the process, learn earlier in the process so that when you get to production you're not failing, you're not having to worry about failure because you cut as much as you could in the earlier phases of your development life cycle. And that's been set, like you said that dynamic piece has just been such the difference. I think in why it's been taken off. >> Yeah. >> And industry this last five years now that we've been around. >> Yeah, for sure. So then the next one well, I'm just going to go through them 'cause there's three main tenants of this thing. These techniques and techniques enabled loosely coupled systems that allow engineers to make high impact changes frequently and predictably with minimum toil. I mean, those are, those are really hard challenges in a classic waterfall way with PRDs and MRDs and everything locked down in a big, giant Gantt chart that fills half of the half the office to actually be able to have loosely coupled systems. Again a really interesting concept versus hardwired, connected systems. Now you're talking about APIs and systems all connecting. Really different way to think about development and how do you build applications. >> Yeah and the interesting thing there is the very first definition we came up with five plus years ago was containers, containerized workloads, right? And being technologist, everyone focused on those words containers and containerized and then everything had to be a container, right? And to your point, that isn't what we're trying to do, right? We're trying to create services that are just big enough to support whatever is needed for that service to support and be able to scale those up and down independently of other dependent systems that may have different requirements associated with what they have to do, right. And it was more about that keeping those highly efficient type of patterns in mind of spinning up and spinning down things that don't have impact or cause impact to other larger components around them was really the key not containers or containerized. >> Right. >> Obviously that's one of the patterns you could follow to create those types of services and those patterns, but there is nothing that guarantees it has to be a container that can do that. Lots of BMS today and lots of Bare Metal Servers can have a similar function. They're just not going to be as dynamic as you may want them to be in other environments. >> Right and then the third tenant, three of three is fostering sustainable ecosystem of open source vendor neutral projects, democratizing state-of-the-art patterns to make these innovations accessible for everyone. So just the whole idea of democratization of technology, democratization of data, democratization of tools, to do something with the data to find the insight democratization of the authority to execute on those decisions once you get going on that, I mean the open source and kind of this democratization to enable a broad distribution of power to more than just mahogany row, huge fundamental shift in the way people think about things. And really even still today, as everyone's trying to move their organizations to be more data-centric in the way they operate, it is really all about the democratization and getting that information and the tools and the ability to do something with it to as broad a group of people as you can. And that's even before we talk about open source development and the power of again, as you said, bringing in this really active community who want to contribute. It's a really interesting way that open source works. It's such a fun thing to watch, and I'm not a developer from the outside, but to see people get excited about helping other people. I think that's probably the secret to the whole thing that really taps into. >> Yeah, it is. And open source, there were discussions about open source for 20 plus years trying to get more into open source contributing to open source in an enterprise mindset, right? And it could never really take off 'cause it's not really the foundation or the platforms or the capabilities needed to do that. And now to your point, open source was really the underlying engine that is making all of this possible. Without open source and some of those early days of trying to get more open source and understanding of open source in the enterprise, I think we'd still be trying to get adoption but open source had just gotten to that point where everyone wanted to do more with open source. The CNCF comes along and said, here's the set of democratized, we're not going to have kingmakers in this organization. We're going to have a lot of open solutions, a lot of good options for companies to look at, and we're not going to lock you in to anything. 'Cause that's another piece of that open source model, right. Open source still can lock you in, right. But if you have open choices within open source, there's less, lock-in potential and locking isn't really a horrible thing. It's just one of those tenants you don't want to be tied too tightly to any one solution or one hope, open source even program because that could 'cause issues of that minimal toil we talked about, right. If you have a lot of dependencies and a lot of, I always joked about OpenStack but if I have to email two guys, if I find an issue in OpenStack about security that's not really a great security model that I can tell my customers I have your security covered, right? So, you want to get away from emails and having to ask for help, if you see a big security issue you want to just address it right then and fix it fast. >> Right, right. So much to unpack there. And for those that don't follow you, you've done a ton of presentations. You've got a ton of great content out of the internet with deep technical dives, into some of this stuff and the operational challenges in your philosophies but good keeping it kind of high level here. 'Cause one of the themes that comes up over and over in some of the other stuff I saw from you is really about asking the right questions. And we hear this time and time again, that the way to get the right answer first you got to frame the question right. And you talk quite extensively about asking the why and asking the how. I wonder if you can unpack that a little bit as to why those two questions are so important and how do you ask them in a way that doesn't piss everybody off or scare them away when you're at a big company like MasterCard that has a lot of personal information, you're in the finance industry, you got ton of regulation but still you're asking how and you're asking why. >> Yeah, definitely. And those, those are two questions that I keep coming back to in the industry because they are, they're not asked enough in my opinion. I think they, for the reasons you brought up those there's too much pushback or there's, you don't want to be viewed as someone who's being difficult, right? And there maybe other reasons why you don't want to ask that but I like to ask the why first because it, you kind of have to understand what's the problem you're trying to solve. And it kind of goes back to my engineering background, I think right. I love to solve problems and one of my early days and you might have heard this on one of my, my interviews, right. But in my early days, I was trying to fix a problem that I was on an advanced engineering team. And I was tier four support in a large Telco. And for months we had this issue with one of our large oil based companies and no one could solve it. And I was on call the night that they called in. And I asked the guy a simple question, tell me which lights you see on this DHUC issue? Which is a piece of equipment that sits between a ATM network and a regular Sonnet network. So we're watching, I'm asking them as kind of find out where in this path, there's a problem. And the guy tells me where there's no lights on. And I'm like well, plug in the power and let me know when it boots up and then let's try another test. And that was the problem. So my, the cleaning crew would come through and unplugged it. And so I learned early on in my crew that if you don't ask those simple questions, you just assume that everything's working almost nine times out of 10, it's the simple, easy solution to a problem. You're just too busy thinking of all the complex things that could go wrong and trying to solve all the hard problems first. And so I really try to help people think about, ask the why questions, ask, why is this important? Why do we need to do this now? Why, what would happen if we don't do this? If we did it this other way, what's the downside of doing it this other way? Really think through your options, 'cause it may take you 20, 30 minutes to kind of do a good analysis of a problem, but then your solution you're not going to spend weeks trying to troubleshoot when it doesn't work because you put the time upfront to think about it. So that's sort of the main reason why I like to ask the why and the how, because it forces you to think outside of your normal, my job is to take this cog and put it over here and fix this, right. And you don't want to be in that, that mode when you're solving complex problems because you overlook or you miss the simple things. >> Right. So you don't like the 'cause we've always done it that way? (both laughing) >> I do not. And I hear that a lot everywhere I've been in the industry and anywhere, any company you have those, this is the way we've always done it. >> Yeah, yeah. Just like the way we've always traveled, right. And the way we've always been educated and the way we've always consumed entertainment. It's like really? I wanted to (indistinct) >> I have learned though that there's a good, I like to understand the reason behind why we've always done it that way. So I do always ask that question. >> Right. >> I don't turn around on someone and get mad at them and you say, Oh, we can't we have to do it differently. I don't have the mindset of let's throw that out the window because I realized that over time something happened. It's like when I had younger kids, I always laugh because they put these warnings on those whatever they call them at the kids stand up in them. >> Right, the little, the little (indistinct) >> Don't put them on top of the stairs right. These stupid little statements are written on there. And I always thought I was dumb. And if somebody told me, well that's because somebody put their kid near the pool and they drown. >> Right, right. >> You have to kind of point out the obvious to people and so, >> Yeah. >> I don't think it's that dangerous of a situation and in the work environment, but hopefully we're not making the same mistakes that have been prevented by not allowing just the, not because we've done it this way before modeled it to go forward. >> Right, right now we have a rule around here too. There's a reason we have every rules is because somebody blew it at some point in time. That's why we have the rule that I want to shift gears a little bit and talk about automation, right? 'Cause automation is such a big and important piece of this whole story especially as these systems scale, scale, scale. And we know that people are prone to errors. I mean, I had seen that story about the cleaner accidentally unplugging things. We all know that people fat fingers, copy and paste is not used as universally as it should be. But I wonder if you could share, how important automation is. And I know you've talked a lot about how people should think about automate automation and prioritizing automation and helping use automation to both make people more productive but also to prioritize what the people should be working on as well as lowering the error rate on stuff that they probably shouldn't be doing anyway. >> Exactly, yeah automation to me is, as you've heard me say before is it's something that is probably almost as big of a key tenet as open source should be, right? It's one of those foundational things that it really helps you to get rid of some of that churn and some of the toil that you run into in a production environment where you're trying to always figure out what went wrong and why did this system not work on this point in time and this day and this deployment, and it's almost to your point always a fat finger, someone deleted an IP address from the IPAM system. There's all kinds of errors that you can people can tell you about that have happened. But to the root of your question is automation needs to be thought about from three different primary areas in my view, in my experience. The first one is the infrastructure as code, software defined infrastructure, right. So the networking teams and the storage teams and the security teams are probably the furthest behind in adopting automation in in their jobs, right. And their jobs are probably the most critical pieces of the infrastructure, right? And so those are, those are pieces that I really highly encouraged them to think about how can they automate those areas. The second piece is I think is equally as important as the infrastructure piece is the application side. When I first joined multiple enterprises in the past, the test coverage is in the low 10's to 20%, right. And your test coverage is a direct correlation to how well your application is going to behave and production in terms of failures, right? So if you have low test coverage, you're going to have high failure rates. It's sort of over over all types of industries every study has shown that, right. So getting your test coverage up and testing the right things not just testing to have test coverage right. >> But actually. >> Right, right. >> Thinking through your user stories and acceptance criteria and having good test is really, really important. So you have those two bookends, right. And in between, I think it's important that you look at how you connect to these services, these distributed systems we talked about in the opening right. If you fully automate your infrastructure and fully automate your application development and delivery, that's great. But if in the middle you have this gooey middle that doesn't really connect well doesn't really have the automation in place to ensure that your certificates are there that your security is in place. That middle piece can become really a problem from a security and from a availability issue. And so those those are the two pieces that I say really focus on is that gooey middle and then that infrastructure piece is really the two keys. >> Right, right. You've got another group of words that you use a lot. I want you to give us a little bit more color behind it. And that's talking to people to tell them that they need to spend more time on investigation. They need to do more experimentation. And then and the one that really popped out to me was it was retro to retrospective to not necessarily a postmortem which I thought is interesting. You say retrospective versus the postmortem, because this is an ongoing process for continuous improvement. And then finally, what seems drop dead dumb obvious is to iterate and deliver. But I wonder if you can share a little bit more color on how important it is to experiment and to investigate and to have those retrospectives. >> Yeah definitely. And then it kind of goes back to that culture we want to create in a Cloud Native world, right. We want to be open to thinking about how we can solve problems better, how we can have each iteration we want, to look at, how do we have a less toil, have less issues. How do we improve the, I liked kind of delight in your experience, how do you make your developers and your customers specific, but specifically how do you make your customers so happy with your service? And when you think about those sort of areas, right. You want to spend some portion of your time dedicated to how do I look at and investigate better ways of doing things or more improvements around the way my customer experience is being delivered. Asking your customers questions, right. You'd be surprised how how many customers don't ever get asked for their opinion on how something works, right. And they want to be asked, they'd love to give you feedback. It doesn't necessarily mean you're going to go do it that next iteration, right? The old adage I like to use is if Henry Ford had listened to his customers he would have tried to breed a faster horse, right? And so you have to kind of think about what you want to try to deliver as a product and as an organization but at the same time, that input is important. And I think, I say carve it out, because if you don't, we're so busy today and there's so much going on in our lives. If you don't dedicate and carve out some of that time and protect that time, you will never get to that, right. It's always a, I'll get to that next year. Maybe our next iteration I'll try, right. And so it's important to really hold that time as sacred and spend time every week, every couple of weeks, whatever it works out in the schedule, but actually put that in your calendar and block out that time and use it to really look at what's possible, what's relevant, what kind of improvements you can have. I think those are really the key the key takeaways I can have from that piece of it. And then, the last one you asked about, which I think is so important, is the retrospective, right. Always trying to get better and better at what you do is, is an engineer's goal, right? We never liked to fail. We never liked to do something twice, right? We don't want to, we want to learn the first time we make a mistake and not make it over and over again. So that those retrospectives and improving on what you're doing iteratively. And to the point you brought up and I like to bring this up a lot, 'cause I've been part not at MasterCard, but at other companies parts of companies that would talk a great game come up with great stories, say here's our plan. And then when we get ready to go to deliver it, we go and we reinvestigate the plan and see if there's a better plan. And then we get to a point where we're ready to go execute. And then we go back and start all over again, right. And you've got to deliver iteratively, if you don't, you're the point I like to always make is you're never going to be ready, right. It's like, when are you ready to have kids? You never ready to have kids, right. You just have to go and you'll learn as you go. You know so. >> Right, right, I love that. Well again, Ken, you have so much great stuff out there for technical people that want to dive in deep? So I encourage them just to do a simple YouTube or excuse me, YouTube search or Google search but I want to give you the last word. One word, I'm going to check the transcript when this thing is over that you've used probably more than any other word while we've been talking for the last few minutes is toil. And I think it's really interesting that it brings up and really highlights your empathy towards what you're trying to help developers avoid and what you're trying to help teams avoid so that they can be more productive. You keep saying, avoid the toil, get out of the toil, get out of this kind of crap that inhibits people from getting their job done and being creative and being inventive and being innovative. Where does that come from? And I just love that you keep reinforce it and just kind of your final perspective as we wrap on 2020 and another year of CNCF and clearly containers and Kubernetes and Cloud Native is continues to be on fire and on a tear. I just wonder if you can share a little bit of your perspective as a founding member as we kind of come to the end of 2020. >> Yeah definitely. Thanks again for having me. It's been a great, great discussion. I am a developer by background, by trade today, I still develop. I still contribute to open source and I've had this mantra pretty much my entire career that you have to get into the weeds and understand what everyone's experiencing in order to figure out how to solve the problems, right. You can't be in an ivory tower and look down and say, Oh, there's a problem, I'm going to go fix that. It just doesn't work that way. And most problems you try to solve in that model will be problems that no other team has really experienced. And there not going to be help, they're not going to be thankful that you solved the problem they don't have, right? They want you to solve a problem that they have. And so I think that that's sort of a key for the reason why I spent so much time talking about that as I live it every day. I understand it. I talk with my development community and with a broader community of developers at MasterCard and understand the pains that they're going through and try to help them every day with coming up with ways to help make their lives a lot easier. So it's important to me and to to all organizations out there and in all of the, in the world. So, CNCF its been great. It's still growing. I'm always looking for end users. I'd love to talk to you. Well, you can reach out to, to the CNCF if you'd like to learn more, our website has information on how to get connected to the end user community. We community within the CNCF that is not, it's a private community. So you don't have to worry about your information being shared. If you don't want people to know you belong to the community, you don't have to list that information. If you want to list it, you're welcome to list it. There's no expectations on you to contribute to open source, but we do encourage you to contribute, and are here to support that end user community any way we can. So thanks again for having us and looking forward to, to a great show in North America. >> All right well, thank you, Ken, for sharing your information sharing the insight, sharing the knowledge really appreciate it and great to catch up. All right. He's Ken, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE with our ongoing coverage of KubeCon + CloudNativeCon 2020 North America Digital. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Red Hat, We're coming to you from to be a part of it again. psyched to have you on, of the practitioners as you call us right? and really changing the so that when you get to production now that we've been around. that fills half of the half the office and be able to scale those up that guarantees it has to be from the outside, but to or the capabilities needed to do that. and over in some of the other stuff I saw And it kind of goes back to So you don't like the 'cause and anywhere, any company you have and the way we've always to understand the reason I don't have the mindset of let's And I always thought I was dumb. before modeled it to go forward. but also to prioritize what of the toil that you run into But if in the middle you have this and to investigate and to And to the point you brought up And I just love that you keep reinforce it to the community, you don't and great to catch up.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ken Owens | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ken | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cloud Native Computing Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two pieces | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
MasterCard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two keys | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
LA | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two guys | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Henry Ford | PERSON | 0.99+ |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.99+ |
30 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cloud Native | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five plus years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
over 150 end users | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
One word | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.97+ |
third tenant | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Software Development Engineering | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first definition | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each iteration | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one solution | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Mastercard | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Cloud Native | TITLE | 0.95+ |
three main tenants | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
CloudNativeCon North America 2020 Virtual | EVENT | 0.93+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
CloudNativeCon 2020 | EVENT | 0.92+ |
Cloud Native Computing Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
couple of years ago | DATE | 0.9+ |
last three years | DATE | 0.9+ |
Agile | TITLE | 0.89+ |
OpenStack | TITLE | 0.88+ |
weeks | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
end of 2020 | DATE | 0.86+ |
open source | TITLE | 0.84+ |
CloudNativeCon NA 2020 | EVENT | 0.83+ |
North American | OTHER | 0.82+ |
Sonnet | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
last five years | DATE | 0.81+ |
Ricardo Rocha, CERN | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon NA 2020
from around the globe it's thecube with coverage of kubecon and cloudnativecon north america 2020 virtual brought to you by red hat the cloud native computing foundation and ecosystem partners hey welcome back everybody jeff frick here with thecube coming to you from our palo alto studios for the continuing coverage of kubecon cloud native con 2020 north america there was the european version earlier in the summer it's all virtual uh so the good news is we don't have to get on planes and we can get guests from all over the world and we're excited to welcome back for his return to the cube ricardo rocha he is a staff member and computing engineer at cern ricardo great to see you hello thanks for having me absolutely and you're coming in from uh from geneva so you're you already had a good thursday i bet yeah we're just finishing right now yeah right so in in getting ready for this um interview i was looking at the interview that you did i think it was two cube cons ago uh in may of 2019 and it just strikes me a lot of people know what cern is but a lot of people don't know what's cern in so i wonder if you can just give you know kind of the 101 of what cern's mission is and what is some of the work that you guys do there yeah sure uh so cern is the european organization for uh nuclear research we are the largest particle physics laboratory in the world and our main mission is uh fundamental research so we try to answer big questions about why don't we see antimatter what is dark matter or dark energy other questions about the origin of the universe and to answer these questions we build very large machines particle accelerators where we try to recreate some of [Music] the moments just after the universe was created the big bang to try to understand better what was the state of the matter at that time the result of all of this is very often a lot of data that has to be analyzed and that's why we traditionally have had a huge requirements for computing resources during the the start of cern we always had this this large large requirements right and so you have this large particle accelerators as you said large machines the one that you've got now the the latest one how long has that one been operational yeah so it started uh like maybe around 10 years ago the first launch was a bit before that uh and it's uh it's a very large uh it's the largest one ever built so it's 27 kilometers in perimeter we inject protons into different uh directions and then we we make them collide where we build these huge detectors that can can see what's happening in these collisions uh the the main the main particle accelerator is this one we do have other experiments we have a nancy meta factory that is just uh down from my office and we have other types of experiments as well going right 27 kilometers that's a big that's a big number and then and then again just so people get some type of sense of scale so then you you you speed up the particles you smash them together you see what happens they collect all the data what types of data sets are generated off off just a one you know kind of event and i don't even know if that's a relative you know if that's a valid measure how do how do you measure kind of quantities of data around event just you know kind of for orders of magnitude right so uh the way it works is as you said we accelerate the particles to very close to the speed of light and we increase the energy by by having the beams well controlled and then at specific points we make them collide we have this gigantic detectors underground all of this is 100 meters in the ground and these detectors are pretty much a very large camera that would take something like 40 million pictures a second and the result of this is a huge amount of data each of these detectors can generate up to one petabyte of second this is not something we can record so what we do is we have hardware filters that will bring this down to something we can manage which is in the order of a few tens of gigabytes per second wow so you've been you've got a very serious computing challenge ahead of you because you're the one that's on the hook for for grabbing the data recording the data making the data available for for people to use um on their experiments um so we're here at kubecon cloud native con where did containers come into the story uh and and kubernetes specifically what was the real uh challenge that you're trying to overcome yeah so uh this is a a long story of uh using distributed computing at cern and other types of computing so as i mentioned we generate a lot of data we generate something like 7 but of 70 petabytes of data every year and we accumulated something over one half an exabyte of data by now so uh traditionally we've had to build this software ourselves um which was uh because there was not so many people around that would have this kind of needs but this revolution with containers and the clouds appearing kind of allowed us to to join other other communities and benefit also from their work and not have to do everything ourselves so this is the main probe for us to start doing this the other point is more containerization we traditionally are very we have a lot of needs to share information but also share resources between physicists and engineers so this idea of containerizing the work including all the code all the data and then sharing this with our colleagues is very appealing the fact that we can also take this unit of work and just deploy it in any infrastructure that has a standardized api like kubernetes and scale that monitoring the same way it's also very appealing so all of these things kind of connect with our way of working our natural way of working i would say right so you've talked about the this upgrade is coming um to the particle accelerator in a couple four or five years whatever that timeline is relatively soon um this as you've said before is a huge step function in the data that's that that's going to come off these experiments i mean how are you keeping up on the compute side with the fundamental shift in on kind of the physics side and the data that's going to be generated to make sure that you can keep up and i think you said it in a prior interview somewhere along the way that you know you don't want to be the bottleneck when there's all this great work being done but if it's not captured and made available for people to do stuff with the data then you know it's not uh it's not the greatest experiment so how are you keeping up and and what's the relative scale to have what you got to do on the compute side to keep up with the the guys on the physics side yeah so the the the idea well we what we will have to deal with is an increase of 10 times of more data than we have today we already have a lot and very soon we'll have a lot more but this is not i would say this is not the first time this kind of uh step happens uh in our computing we always kind of found a new technology or a new way to do things that would improve in in this case uh what we do is we do what we always do which is we try to look for all sorts of new technologies or all sorts of new resources that we could make use of in this case a lot is involving improving our own software to replace what we currently use with hardware triggers to replace that with software-based using accelerators gpus and other types of accelerators this will play a big role and also making our software more efficient in this way the second thing that we are doing is trying to make our infrastructure more agile and this is where cloud native kubernetes plays a huge role so that we can benefit from external resources uh we we can always think of like expanding our in on-premises resources but it's also very good to be able to just go and fish around if there's something available externally kubernetes plays a very big role in that respect as well yeah i'd love to dig into that a little deeper because the cloud native foundation is a super active foundation obviously a ton of activity around kubernetes so what does that mean to you as an infrastructure provider you know to your own company being on the hook to have now you know kind of an open source community that's supporting you indirectly via ongoing developments and ongoing projects and having as you said kind of this broader group of brain power to pull from to help you move your own infrastructure along yeah i think this this is great we've had really good experiences in the past we've been uh heavy users of uh linux from from from for a very long time we've used openstack for our private cloud and we've been heavily involved in that community as well we not only uh contribute as end users but we also uh offer some some manpower for development and helping with the community and we are doing the same with kubernetes uh and this is uh this is really we we end up getting a lot more than we we are putting in the community we are quite involved but uh it's so large and and and with such big players that have very similar needs to ours that uh we end up having a lot a lot more back than we are putting in we try to help as much as possible but uh yeah we have limited resources as well now open source is an amazing it's just an amazing innovation uh machine and and obviously it's proved as its value over a lot of things from linux to kubernetes being one of the most recent i want to shift gears a little bit right and ask you just your your take on public cloud right one of the huge benefits of public cloud is is the flexibility to add capacity shrink capacity as you need it and you talked again in a prior thing i was looking at you know that you definitely have spikes uh in demand spikes whether there's a high frequency of experiments i don't know how frequently you run those things versus maybe a conference or something where you said people you know want to get access to the data run experiments prior to your conference do you where does public cloud play in your thoughts and maybe you're there today maybe you're not how do you think about you know kind of public cloud generically but more specifically you know that ability to add a little bit more flex in your compute horsepower or are you just going up into the right up into the right and not really flexing down very much yeah so this is this is something we've been working on for a few years now uh we it's uh it's uh it's i would say it's an ongoing work it's a situation that will will not uh be very clear for the for the next few years but again what what we try to do is just to explore as much as possible all kinds of resources that can help us what we did in the kubecon last year was this demonstration that we can actually scale we can scale out and burst for for this uh spiky workloads we have we can burst to the to the public cloud quite easily using this kind of cloud native technologies that we have today and this is extremely important because it kind of changes our mindset instead of having to to think only on investing on premises we can think that maybe we can cover for the majority of use cases but then explore and burst to the public cloud this has to be easy in terms of infrastructure and that we are at that point right now with kubernetes we also have kind of workload that is maybe easier to do these things than than a traditional i.t where services are very interconnected in our case we are more thinking of batch workloads where we can just submit jobs uh and then fetch the data back right this also has a few challenges but but it's i would say it's it's easier than the traditional ite service deployments the other aspect where the public cloud is also very interesting is uh for resources that we don't have in large quantities so we have a very large farm for with cpus we have some gpus and it's very good to be able to explore this new accelerator technologies and maybe expand our available pool of accelerators by going to the public cloud maybe to use them but also to validate to see which ones are best for our use cases and explore that option as well it's not only general capacity it's really like dedicated um hardware that we might not even have ever like we think of tpus or ipu's it's something that is very interesting that we can scale and just go go use them in the public cloud yeah that's a really interesting point because because the cloud providers are big enough now right that they're building all kind of specialized specialized server specialized uh cpu specialized gpus dpus is a new one i've heard a data processing unit as you said there's fpgas and all kinds of accelerators so it is a really rich environment for as you said to do your experiments and find what the optimal solution is for whatever that particular workload is but ricardo i want to shift gears a little bit as we come to the end of 2020 thankfully for a whole bunch of reasons as you look forward to 2021 i mean clearly anticipating and starting to plan to get ready for your upgrade as a priority i'm just curious what are your other priorities and how does you know kind of the compute infrastructure in terms of an investment within cern you know kind of rank with the investment around the physical things that you're building the big machines because without the compute those other things really don't provide much data and i know those are we always talked about how expensive the particle accelerators is it's an interesting number and it's big but you guys are a big piece of that as well so what are your priorities looking forward to 2021 yeah from from the compute side i think we are keeping the the priorities in similar to what we've been doing the last few years which is to make sure that we improve all our automation to improve efficiency as well to prepare for these upgrades we have but also there's a lot of activity in this new uh area with machine learning popping up we have a ton of services appearing where people want to to start doing machine learning in many many use cases in some cases they want to do the filtering in the detectors in other cases they want to generate simulation data a lot faster using machine learning as well so i think this will be something that will be a huge topic for next year even for the next couple of years which is to see how we can offer our users and physicists the best service so that they don't have to care about the infrastructure they don't have to know about the details of how they scale their their model training their serving of their models all of this i think this will be a very big topic um it's something that it's becoming really a big part of of the world computing for high energy physics and for cern as well that's great we see that a lot you know just applied machine learning to very specific problems you talked about you still can't even record all that information that comes off those things you have to do some compression technology and other things so real opportunities barely scratched on the surface of machine learning and ai but i'm sure you're going to be using it a ton well ricardo give you give you the last word um we're in at cncf's uh kubecon cloud native con you know what do you get out of these types of shows and why is this such again kind of why is it such an important piece of your way you get your job done yeah honestly uh with all this uh situation right now i kind of really miss this kind of conferences in person uh it's really a huge opportunity to connect with uh with the other end users but also with with the community and to talk to the developers discuss things over uh coffee beer this is something that is really something that is really useful to to have this kind of meetings every year uh i think what what uh i always try to say is uh this this wall infrastructure is is truly making a big impact in the way we do things so we can only thank the community uh it's it allows us to to kind of shift to focusing on a higher level to focus more on our use cases instead of having to focus so much on the infrastructure we kind of start giving it as a given that the infrastructure scales and we can just use it and focus on optimizing our own software so this is a huge contribution we can only thank the cncf projects and everyone involved great well thank you for that uh that summary and that that's a terrific summary so ricardo thank you so much for all your hard work answering really big helping answer really big questions and uh and for joining us today and sharing your insight thank you very much all right he's ricardo i'm jeff you're watching the cube from our palo alto studios for continuing coverage of kubecon cloud nativecon 2020. thanks for watching see you next time [Music] you
SUMMARY :
the relative scale to have what you got
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Ricardo Rocha | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 meters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
27 kilometers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
jeff frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
CERN | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ricardo | PERSON | 0.98+ |
palo alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
40 million pictures | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.98+ |
first launch | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
next year | DATE | 0.98+ |
CloudNativeCon | EVENT | 0.97+ |
jeff | PERSON | 0.96+ |
ricardo rocha | PERSON | 0.96+ |
north america | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
around 10 years ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
geneva | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
101 | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
over one half an exabyte of data | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
70 petabytes of data | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
kubecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
next couple of years | DATE | 0.92+ |
7 | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
every year | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
linux | TITLE | 0.9+ |
last few years | DATE | 0.89+ |
up to one petabyte | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
may of 2019 | DATE | 0.87+ |
end of 2020 | DATE | 0.87+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.87+ |
next few years | DATE | 0.86+ |
a ton of services | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
nancy meta factory | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
NA 2020 | EVENT | 0.8+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
cloudnativecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
a lot of people | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
a lot of data | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
few tens of gigabytes per second | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
so many people | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
kubecon | EVENT | 0.75+ |
openstack | TITLE | 0.74+ |
challenges | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
kubecon cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.66+ |
thursday | DATE | 0.66+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
a second | QUANTITY | 0.64+ |
lot of people | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
a few years | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
cern | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
european | OTHER | 0.58+ |
lot of data | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
in the summer | DATE | 0.55+ |
red | PERSON | 0.54+ |
cloud nativecon 2020 | EVENT | 0.54+ |
lot of activity | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
two cube | QUANTITY | 0.49+ |
con | EVENT | 0.4+ |
Sandra Wheatley , Fortinet | CUBEConversation
(upbeat music) >> Narrator: From theCUBE studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is theCUBE conversation. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody Jeff Frick here with theCUBE coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today for a cube conversation, you know we're like six, seven, eight months into this COVID thing. We're going to be dealing with it for a while. And one of the themes we've heard about over and over as kind of a result of COVID is an increased in the attack surfaces. More people are working from home or work from anywhere. And security has only been increasing in importance. And we're excited to have somebody from the alumni group who's been on before she is Sandra Wheatley the SVP marketing threat intelligence and influencer communications at Fortinet. Sandra great to see you. >> Thank you Jeff, I'm happy to be here. >> Yeah, I think actually I misspoke. We've had a ton of great Fortinet people on we've talked to John and Ken and Phil and Tony, but actually I'm not sure that we've had you on before, so great to have you. >> No, this is my first time. >> Awesome, so let's jump into it but we're going to take a slightly different tack today and we're not going to talk about the technology as much as this other pesky little problem, which is people. And, you know we know there's a huge skills gap in tech in general right. There's tons and tons of open recs. If you go into all the big sites and then security it's even a more specific and a more acute problem. I wonder if you can tell us a little bit about kind of your perspective on this problem, being a senior executive you know, at a security company, people is a big issue. How do you guys kind of look at the problem? How should people think about it and what are we going to do about it? >> Well, Jeff, you were completely right. The Cyber security skills gap. It's one of the biggest challenges that's facing organizations today. I mean if you look at the larger landscape, cyber crime is one of the fastest growing crimes in the world, in fact by 2021, it'll cost the world about 6 trillion in total. And so tackling this issue continues to be a big problem. And it's exasperated by this the skills gap we recently did a study of Fortinet and 73% of respondents acknowledged that at least one intrusion could be attributed to the lack of skilled professionals. So it's a huge problem. We know that it would take about 4 million professionals to close that gap. And in particular with COVID, it's become even more increased. We've seen a big uptick in attacks from cyber criminals, really targeting remote workers. It's a way into the enterprise network. We've seen a resurgence of ransomware and phishing targeting that workforce. And so as this threat landscape continues to increase it's definitely a problem that cybersecurity organizations public and private partnerships really need to tackle. >> It's interesting because we talk a lot about automation and we talk about the scale of the attacks and the scale of data and you know, everything is just going so up until the right that without automation, you know you have no hope and you need some help to basically separate signal from noise. That said you still need people. And really that automation is going to hopefully get the high visibility the high priority issues to the right people. But ultimately that's an enabler for a person, not a replacement for person, for people. And it doesn't take away this tremendous need for more security professionals. And the other thing that we hear Sandra over and over right, is that security is no longer a bolt on it's no longer, you know, you just build the wall around the outside of everything, right? It's got to be baked in throughout the entire process of the product development and deployment. So the importance and kind of the reach and the breadth of security people in the influence of the building new products and shipping new products has never been greater and yet we've got this huge shortage. >> Exactly and I think you touched on it. You know, what we're hearing from our customers is that they're really using this period during COVID to really take a long-term look at their cybersecurity investments and strategy. And so you're right increasingly organizations are taking more of a platform approach to security, where they have more automation integration and AI that's one help. The other area is organizations need to be making their employees more cyber aware because it impacts everyone even employees working at home organizations. We just released InfoSec training and we offered it we made it available for free, and it really enables organizations to help educate their employees about the risk of cybersecurity and helping them to understand not to hit on the phishing email because, you know, 68% of intrusions happened as a result of careless mistakes by employees. That's a big issue, but also really making sure that we bring more professionals into the industry. I like to say, there's no job security like cybersecurity. So at the beginning of COVID, we made all of our training free and to the public in general. And I believe we had 500,000 registrations in the first six months. So that really underscores the demand for cybersecurity skills. And then organizations can also really be tapping into underrepresented of demographics, like veterans like women who make up only 14% of the workforce overall. So there was a lots of things we can be doing and working together on this problem. >> Yeah, you touched on a whole bunch of things there. So let's unpack a couple of them specifically. One of the cool things about security is that you guys do work together and that there is a big benefit from working together. So it's a great place for kind of coopetition, especially as new threats come in and you guys can share that information. So there is an interesting kind of an ecosystem that there's, you know shared basically resources against the bad guys. But you guys did a really interesting thing with Salesforce, with the world economic forum specifically to go after this problem. So where did that come from, Why Salesforce? Why world economic forum and why take you know, kind of, I guess, out of the industry approach to really addressing getting more people as cybersecurity professionals? >> Well, for dinette as a founding member of the C foresee cybersecurity forum, it was created by the world economic forum about two years ago. And right from the beginning one of the initiatives that we began working on was to reduce the skills gap. And so we started working with the world economic forum Salesforce, which is another founding member and others to tackle this problem. And so we're provide all of our training we provide our training and curriculum on the salesforce Trailhead platform. We've also entered into another partnership with IBM, where we're providing our training on there as cyber skills platform. We're working with local universities like Berkeley and others to make sure that we're getting more of the curriculum into their certifications and degree programs. Interestingly enough, one of the issues with this challenges is that there's not a lot of universities offering degrees in cybersecurity, which is really surprising. And so we're seeing a lot more uptick and interest around awareness around this area. And so it's very encouraging to see the results of some of these partnerships. >> I don't, I mean, you I'm going to tease you kind of buried the lead but so people understand what you just said. You guys basically opened up your training catalog for free, during COVID as a reaction to help basically get more people trained. Am I getting that right? >> That's completely right. We saw that this is something that can really help our customers during this time. It's something we're committed to closing and we felt this was a really impactful way to help with that issue. >> That's amazing. And I saw you in an interview with Rob Rashad I believe is his name from your team. I wonder if you can, again, share with us some of the details in terms of the numbers of people that have gone through this program. Cause he mentioned them, somebody didn't write them down this is pretty significant numbers that you guys are running through this free program. >> Yeah, so we just passed a great big milestone of 500,000 certifications. Half of those have just been this year and that program's been in place for many, many years. So there's no doubt that this is something that's in huge demand. And so we continue to offer those trainings. This was one of the reasons why we just rolled out the InfoSec training for our customers and others to educate their employees. I mean, that's one point I think we had someone registering every seven minutes. And so the response to that was excellent. And that training program has eight different modules and the curriculum in that program actually provides credits for ISC, which is a a big certification in cybersecurity and CIISSP. So, you know, it's just an invaluable training program. >> That's wild, and again, it's free all the way, not just to register for, you know, the one-on-ones, but all the way through the certification process at the end. >> Well at the end, if you want to get the actual certification that's something that you can do separately after you do the training. Although we're working with some nonprofits to help pay for those certifications so that there's no financial burden to people. >> Wow, that's tremendous. And then the other piece that you mentioned but I just want to highlight it is the opportunity to go after underrepresented groups. And you specifically mentioned that you have a program for veterans and again, it seems so logical but some people just don't get it right. Then you've got a skills shortage and you've got a talent shortage. Why not tap into those markets and of those pools of people that are under utilized because, Oh, by the way, they probably have a bunch of good qualified people in there that you can leverage. >> That's exactly right, like vets if you look at take veterans for an example, they already have a lot of the skills that really work well for cybersecurity like situational awareness. They work very well under pressure. And so we started our veterans program about two years ago. And in addition to our training we offer mentoring curriculum, resume building, interviews skills building and now at this point, trained about a thousand veterans many have had jobs on one thing that we do that's different to other programs is that we bridge those candidates to our partners and customers who are looking for talent and really closed that whole loop. So it's not just about the training, but it's also finding them as well at the end of the training once it's been completed. >> Right, that's great. I also want to touch on another thing that you do beyond just training and this comes from you published a blog on July eighth of this year talking about overcoming the cybersecurity gap skills gap. But you talked about other things beyond just the people. And I want to highlight really some attitudinal things that you suggest for people to get over this world view, cyber security as an enabler, right? Not an obstacle recognize cybersecurity is a team effort. It's not just some superstar, get the C-suite involved collaborate on cybersecurity awareness and you know, thinking about these this issue at a little broader and a more kind of macro company-wide scale versus it's just the security people's job over in the security people's corner. And that's really the best way to take care of it. >> Absolutely, and that goes back to my earlier point. I mean the insider threat continues to be the biggest vector for attacks. A lot of times it's, you know, employees hitting on a phishing email I'm sure you've seen the increase in those. And so it's really, you're right. It's more, the responsibility just doesn't lie with the folks who lead the cybersecurity organization. We all have a responsibility to be much more educated and aware. And so I think you know, the board has to get them more involved. Executive management needs to make sure that they're providing the right training and education to their employees, that they're providing mentoring that the really encouraging more employees to move into cybersecurity and become certified. So there's lots of things that organizations need to be doing that include education training. And then also making sure that you're making the right technology investments so that you have an infrastructure in place that's agile and can be flexible enough to meet the increasing demands of the threat landscape. >> Right, I just wonder if you can share some insight on the conversation that happened before you guys opened this up to be free. 'Cause it's clearly, it's a move to do the right thing. It's a move to you know, to respond to the community that's suffering and it's something that you guys could do you had at your disposal, but I'm sure there was some naysayers in there they're saying "No, we can't give this away. This is super valuable stuff." How, you know how did you kind of make that decision to move forward? And I'm curious how it's kind of played out over time now that you've basically, as you said increased your exposure and people that are trained and you know, I'm sure a lot of positive, you know kind of second order benefits that you really didn't plan on when you were just trying to make a decision to help the community. >> Well, this was a decision that came from the top. Our CEO has always been committed to training. I mean, this is why we even started the program which our NSE program is one of the most robust in the industry. And so it's something that the founders have always been committed to. It's something that we've invested in. So there really wasn't any obstacles to doing this. This was something that everyone jumped on board with. The other thing is we really wanted to help our customers during this time. And we felt that this was one really meaningful way. We could help them by providing this training for free. And making sure that they have the talent that they need to really address all of the, you know, the expanding attack surface. But we were surprised by the demand and the response that was outstanding, right from the get-go. And so while we, you know, we've talked about this being offered to the end of the year we haven't really made any plans to change that. And so that it may continue beyond the end of the year because the demand is so great and the results have been so positive. >> Right. And I'm just curious, do you have in the training and I didn't go through exhaustively through the whole list of all the courses, but beyond just the professionals do you have all the basic training just for employees? I just don't click on the link. You know, it's so funny. I was at, I think it was RSA. One of the keynotes was a, a Cisco executive and she said you know, we tell people not to click links but that's what we do all day long. We click links, that's what we do, it's part of our job. And, you know, it's such a a weird behavior to tell people not to do. And I'm still confused how SurveyMonkey gets people to click on SurveyMonkey links but that's a different conversation for another day but I mean, are you offering the whole suite? And I just love to get your perspective as a security executive, when you talk to clients how to think about things beyond just the obvious you know, don't click on phishing emails and, you know, tighten up everything, but you know, more kind of high level how to think about security in this increasingly complex and dangerous world, if you will. >> Yeah, well, the training program has eight modules. It goes from the most basic training to the most advanced training. So our NSE one and two are really more about educating people about the threat landscape the threats out there, what it looks like the most basic emphasis security awareness around what you should do and what you should be looking out for. And all of our employees afforded that take that training. We take up to NSE 4, that's, something that's mandated. And so at the very basic level all organizations should be leveraging those modules for their employees and for individuals who are just interested at large. And then it really advances very quickly after that. And it's the most advanced, you know, it covers, you know cloud, the whole attack surface, AI, threat intelligence. And actually, as I mentioned earlier, provides credits for some of that top cybersecurity certifications in the industry, especially at the level of CSO. So it's very broad, it's extremely robust. And addition to those modules we also have what we call fast track training and that's really utilized by our customers and partners. And that's more focused on specific technology areas. It's very condensed, it may be a day or two days. And the demand for that has been phenomenal. So that's been another program we added about two years ago. That's been very well received. >> Wow, well, good for you guys. Good for you guys for making a proactive move in a very positive way to help your customers and help the community at large. It's just great to see, these are just tough times. They're going to be tough times for a little while longer. So, you know, it's nice that you have resources available that you're able to make to make available to the larger community. And I'm sure it's nothing, but goodness will come from it. So good move by you guys. And I'm sure there's a lot of tangential benefits as well. >> Thank you Jeff. >> Well, thank you Sandra for sharing the story and great to meet you and expand our our community over on the fourth tenet side, we've had a lot of great guests over the year so it was great to great to have you on as well. >> Thank you very much. We really appreciate all the support. >> Absolutely, thank you. All right, so go out and get your free training. Go to fortinet.com and sign up and you too could be a security expert, or at least as far as you want to go all the way up to certification. I'm Jeff, she's Sandra you're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching, we'll see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world, And one of the themes we've that we've had you on before, of look at the problem? cyber crime is one of the and the scale of data and you know, on the phishing email because, you know, is that you guys do work together And right from the beginning I'm going to tease you We saw that this is something And I saw you in an And so the response to that was excellent. you know, the one-on-ones, Well at the end, that you have a program And in addition to our training And that's really the best And so I think you know, It's a move to you know, And so while we, you know, we've talked And I just love to get your perspective And so at the very basic level and help the community at large. and great to meet you We really appreciate all the support. and you too could be a security expert,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sandra Wheatley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sandra | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tony | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Rashad | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
68% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ken | PERSON | 0.99+ |
500,000 registrations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Phil | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Fortinet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July eighth | DATE | 0.99+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
73% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NSE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
fortinet.com | OTHER | 0.98+ |
Half | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
500,000 certifications | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 6 trillion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
RSA | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first six months | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about 4 million professionals | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
eight months | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
14% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
eight modules | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
second order | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
fourth tenet | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.91+ |
Berkeley | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
eight different modules | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.84+ |
NSE 4 | TITLE | 0.83+ |
intrusions | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
end | DATE | 0.8+ |
Trailhead | TITLE | 0.78+ |
InfoSec | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
every seven minutes | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
C foresee | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
about | DATE | 0.74+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
COVID | TITLE | 0.72+ |
about two years ago | DATE | 0.71+ |
tons and tons | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
one of | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
SurveyMonkey | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
about a thousand veterans | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
open | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
at least one intrusion | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
Kevin L. Jackson, GC GlobalNet | Citrix Security Summit 2020
from the cube studios in palo alto in boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world this is a cube conversation hey welcome back everybody jeff frick here with the cube coming to you from our palo alto studios with a cube conversation with a great influencer we haven't had him on for a while last had him on uh in may i think of 2019 mid 2019. we're excited to welcome back to the program he's kevin l jackson he is the ceo of gc globalnet kevin great to see you today hey how you doing jeff thanks for having me it's uh it's been a while but i really enjoyed it yeah i really enjoy being on thecube well thank you for uh for coming back so we've got you on to talk about citrix we had you last on we had you on a citrix synergy this year obviously covet hit all the all the events have gone virtual and digital and citrix made an interesting move they decided to kind of break their thing into three buckets kind of around the main topics that people are interested in in their world and that's cloud so they had a citrix cloud summit they had a citrix workplace summit and now they just had their last one of the three which is the citrix security summit uh just wrapped up so before we jump into that i just want to get your take how are you doing how you getting through the kind of covid madness from you know the light switch moment that we experienced in march april 2. you know now we're like seven eight months into this and it's not going to end anytime soon well you know it's it was kind of different for me because um i've been working from home and remotely since i guess 2014 being a consultant and with all my different clients i was doing a lot more traveling um but with respect to doing meetings and being on collaborative systems all day long it's sort of like uh old hat and i say welcome to my world but i find that you know society is really changing the things that you thought were necessary in business you know being physically at meetings and shaking hands that's all like you know although we don't do that anymore yeah i used to joke right when we started this year that we finally got to 2020 the year that we know everything right with the benefit of hindsight but it turned out to be the year that we actually find out that we don't know anything and everything that we thought we knew in fact is not necessarily what we thought and um we got thrown into this we got thrown into this thing and you know thankfully for you and for me we're in you know we're in the tech space we can we can go to digital we're not in the hotel business or the hospitality business or you know so many businesses that are still suffering uh greatly but we were able to make the move in i.t and and citrix is a big piece of that in terms of enabling people to support remote work they've always been in remote work but this really changed the game a lot and i think as you said before we turned on the cameras accelerated you know this digital transformation way faster than anybody planned on oh oh yeah absolutely and another one of the areas that was particularly um accelerated they sort of put the rockets on is security which i'm really happy about because of the rapid increase in the number of remote workers i mean historically companies had most of their workforce in their own buildings on on their own property and there was a small percentage that would remote work remotely right but it's completely flipped now and it flipped within a period of a week or a week and a half and many of these companies were really scrambling to make you know their entire workforce be able to communicate collaborate and just get access to information uh remotely right right well david talked about it in the security keynote you know that you know as you said when this light switch moment hit in mid-march you had to get everybody uh secure and take care of your people and get them set up but you know he talked a little bit about you know maybe there were some shortcuts taken um and now that we've been into this thing in a prolonged duration and again it's going to be going on for a while longer uh that there's really an opportunity to to make sure that you put all the proper uh systems in place and make sure that you're protecting people you're protecting the assets and you're protecting you know the jewels of the company which today are data right and data in all the systems that people are working with every single day yeah yeah absolutely they had to rapidly rethink all of the work models and this uh accelerated digital transformation and the adoption of cloud and it was just this this huge demand for remote work but it was also important to uh keep to think about the user experience the employee experience i mean they were learning new things learning new technologies trying to figure out how to how to do new things and that at the beginning of this uh trend this transition people were thinking that hey you know after a few months we'll be okay but now and it's starting to sink in that this stuff is here to stay so you have to understand that work is not a place and i think actually david said that right it's really you have to look at how the worker is delivering and contributing to the mission of the organization to the business model and you have to be able to measure the workers level of output and their accomplishment and be able to do this remotely so back to office is is not going to happen in reality so the employee experience through this digital environment this digital work space it's critical yeah i think one of the quotes he had whether i think was either this one or one of the prior ones is like back to work is not back to normal right we're not going to go back to the way that it was before but it's interesting you touched on employee experience and that's a big piece of the conversation right how do we measure output versus you know just time punching the clock how do we give people that that experience that they've come to expect with the way they interact in technology in their personal lives but there's an interesting you know kind of conflict and i think you've talked about it before between employee experience and security because those two kind of inherently are going to be always in conflict because the employee's going to want more access to more things easier to use and yet you've got to keep security baked in throughout the stack whether it's access to the systems whether it's the individual and and so there's always this built-in kind of tension between those two objectives well the tension is because of history security has always been sort of a a second thought an afterthought uh you know you said due to work oh security we'll catch up to it when we need to but now because of the importance of data and the inherently global connectivity that we have the the need for security has is paramount so in order to attract that in order to address that the existing infrastructures had this where we just bolted security on to the existing infrastructures uh this is when they when the data centers and we said well as long as it's in our data center we can control it but then we with this covet thing we'll just burst out of any data center we have to rely on cloud so this this concept of just bolting on security just doesn't work because you no longer own or control the security right so you have to look at the entire platform and have a holistic security approach and it has to go from being infrastructure-centric to data centric because that's the only way you're going to provide security to your data to those remote employees right right and there's a very significant shift we hear all the time we've got rsa uh all the time to talk about security and that's this concept of zero trust and and the idea that rather than as you said kind of the old school you put a a wall and a moat around the things that you're trying to protect right you kind of start from the perspective of i don't trust anybody i don't trust where they're coming from i don't trust their device i don't trust that they have access to those applications and i don't trust that they have access to that data and then you basically enable that on a kind of a need to know basis across all those different factors at kind of the least the least amount that they need to get their job done it's a really different kind of approach to thinking about security right and but it's a standardized approach i mean before present time you would customize security to the individual or 2d organization or component of the organization because you know you knew where they were and you would you would say well they won't accept this so we'll do that so everything was sort of piecemeal now that work is not a location you have to be much more standardized much more focused and being able to track and secure that data requires things like digital rights management and and secure browsers and some of the work that citrix has done with google has really been amazing they they looked at it from a different point of view they said okay where people are always working through the cloud in different locations from from anywhere but they all work through their browser so you know we could and i think this was something that the vice president at google said uh sunil potty i believe uh vice president of google cloud they said well we can capitalize on that interface without affecting the experience and he was talking about chrome so so citrix and and google have worked together to drive sort of an agent-less experience to order to enhance security so instead of making everything location specific or organizational specific they set a standard and they support this intent-driven security model yeah it's interesting sunil's a really sharp guy we've had him on thecube a ton of times uh over the years but there's another really interesting take on security and i want to get your your feedback on it and that's kind of this coopetation right and silicon valley is very famous for you know coopetation you might be competing tooth and nail with the company across the street at the same time you got an opportunity to partner you might share apis you know it's a really interesting thing and one of the the items that came out of the citrix show was this new thing called the workspace security alliance because what's interesting in security that even if we're competitors if you're suddenly getting a new type of threat where you're getting a new type of attack and there's a new you know kind of profile actually the industry likes to share that information to help other people in the security business as kind of you know us versus the bad guys even if we're you know competing for purchase orders we're competing you know kind of face-to-face so they announced this security alliance which is pretty interesting to basically bring in partners to support uh coopetition around the zero trust framework uh yeah absolutely this is happening across just about every industry though you're going away from uh point-to-point relationships to where you're operating and working within an ecosystem and in security just this week it's been highlighted by the uh the trick trick bot um activity this uh persistent uh malware that i guess this week is attacking um health care uh facilities the actual the u.s department of homeland security put out an alert now and this is a threat to the entire ecosystem so everyone has to work together to protect everyone's data and that improves that that is the way forward and that's really the only way to be successful so uh we have to go from this point-to-point mindset to understanding that we're all in the same boat together and in this uh alliance the workspace security alliance is an indication that citrix gets it right everyone has workers everyone's workers are remote okay and everyone has to protect their own data so why don't we work together to do that yeah that's great that's interesting i had not heard of that alert but what we are hearing a lot of um in in a lot of the interviews that we're doing is kind of a resurfacing of kind of old techniques uh that the bad guys are using to to try to get remote workers because they're not necessarily surrounded with as much security or have as much baked in in their home setup as they have in the office and apparently you know ransomware is really on the rise and the sophistication of the ransom where folks is very high and that they try to go after your backup and all in you know your replication stuff before they actually hit you up for the uh for the want for the money so it's it's there's absolutely that's right yeah go ahead i'm sorry i was just saying that's indicative of the shift that most of your workers are no longer in your facilities than now and at home where companies never really put a lot of investment into protecting that channel that data channel they didn't think they needed to right right one of the other interesting things that came up uh at the citrix event was the use of uh artificial intelligence and machine learning to basically have a dynamic environment where you're adjusting you know kind of the access levels based on the behavior of the individual so what apps are they accessing what you know are they moving stuff around are they downloading stuff and to actually kind of keep a monitor if you will to look for anomalies and behavior so even if someone is trusted to do a particular type of thing if suddenly they're you know kind of out of band for a while then you know you can flag alerts to say hey what's going on is that this person did their job change you know why are they doing things that they don't normally do maybe there's a reason maybe there isn't a reason maybe it's not them so you know i think there's so many great applications for applied machine learning and artificial intelligence and these are the types of applications where you're going to see the huge benefits come from this type of technology oh yeah absolutely i mean the citrix analytics for security is really a um security service right um that monitors the activities of of people on the internet and it this machine learning gives you or gives the service this insight no one company can monitor the entire internet and you can go anywhere on the internet so bob working together leveraging this external service you can actually have automated remediation of your users you can put this specific user security risk score so um companies and organizations can be assured that they are within their risk tolerance right right and of course the other thing you've been in the business for a while that we're seeing that we're just kind of on the cusp of right is 5g and iot so a lot more connected devices a lot more data a lot more data moving at machine speed which is really what 5g is all about it's not necessarily for having a better phone call right so we're just going to see you know kind of again this this growth in terms of attack surfaces this growth in terms of the quantity of data and the growth in terms of the the the rate of change that that data is coming in and and the scale and the speed with the old uh you know velocity and and variety and volume uh the old big data memes so again the other thing go ahead the other thing it's not just data when you have 5g the virtual machines themselves are going to be traveling over this network so it's a whole new paradigm yeah yeah so the uh once again to have you know kind of a platform approach to make sure you're applying intelligence to keep an eye on all these things from zero trust uh uh kind of baseline position right pretty damn important yeah absolutely with with edge computing the internet of things this whole infrastructure based data centric approach where you can focus on how the individual is interacting with the network is important and and uh another real important component of that is the um software-defined wide area network because people work from everywhere and you have to monitor what they're doing right right yeah it's really worked from anywhere not necessarily work from home anymore i just want to you know again you've been doing this for a while get your feedback on on the fact that this is so much of a human problem and so much of a human opportunity versus just pure technology i think it's really easy to kind of get wrapped up in the technology but i think you said before digital transformation is a cultural issue it's not a technology issue and getting people to change the way they work and to change the way they work with each other and to change what they're measuring um as you said kobe kind of accelerated that whole thing but this has always been more of a cultural challenge in a technology challenge yeah the technology in a relative sense of you is kind of easy right but it's the expectations of humans is what they're used to is what they have been told in the past is the right thing no longer is right so you have to teach you have to learn you have to accept change and not just change but rapid change and accelerated change and people just don't like change they're uncomfortable in change so another aspect of this culture is learning to be adaptable and to accept change because it's going to come whether you want it or not faster than you think as well for sure you're right well that's great so kevin i'll give i give you the final word as as you think about how things have changed and again i think i think the significant thing is that we went from you know kind of this light switch moment where it was you know emergency and and quick get everything squared away but now we're in this we're in kind of this new normal it's going to be going for a while we'll get back to some some version of a hybrid uh solution at some point and you and i will be seeing each other at trade shows at some point in time in the in the future but it's not going to go back the way that it was and people can't wait and hope that it goes back the way that it was and really need to get behind this kind of hybrid if you will work environment and helping people you know be more productive with the tools they need it always gets back to giving the right people the right information at the right time to do what they need to do so just kind of get your perspective as we you know kind of get to the end of 2020 we're going to turn the page here rapidly on 2021 and we're going to start 2021 in kind of the same place we are today well to be honest we've talked about a lot of these things but the answer to all of them is agility agility agility is the key to success this is like not locking into a single cloud you're going to have multiple clouds not locking into a single application you have multiple applications not assuming that you're always going to be working from home or working through a certain browser you have to be agile to adapt to rapid change and the organizations that recognize that and uh teach their workers teach their entire ecosystem to operate together in a rapidly changing world with agility will be successful that's a great that's a great way to leave it i saw beth comstack the former vice chair at ge give a keynote one time and one of her great lines was get comfortable with being uncomfortable and i think you nailed it right this is about agility it's about change it's we've seen it in devops where you embrace change you don't try to avoid it you know you take that really at the top level and try to architect to be successful in that environment as opposed to sticking your head in the sand and praying it doesn't absolutely all right well kevin so great to catch up i'm i'm sorry it's been as long as it's been but hopefully it'll be uh shorter uh before the next time we get to see each other yes fine thank you very much i really enjoyed it absolutely all right he's kevin l jackson i'm jeff frick you're watching thecube from our palo alto studios keep conversation we'll see you next time you
SUMMARY :
in the security keynote you know that
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Kevin L. Jackson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
jeff frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
kevin l jackson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
kevin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
palo alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
chrome | TITLE | 0.99+ |
david | PERSON | 0.99+ |
beth comstack | PERSON | 0.99+ |
march april 2 | DATE | 0.99+ |
citrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ | |
sunil potty | PERSON | 0.98+ |
a week and a half | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
sunil | PERSON | 0.98+ |
a week | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
single application | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
two objectives | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
seven eight months | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
mid-march | DATE | 0.97+ |
GC GlobalNet | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
end of 2020 | DATE | 0.95+ |
a ton of times | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
this year | DATE | 0.95+ |
5g | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Citrix Security Summit 2020 | EVENT | 0.93+ |
this week | DATE | 0.93+ |
palo alto studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
one time | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
single cloud | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
mid 2019 | DATE | 0.91+ |
citrix security summit | EVENT | 0.9+ |
uh alliance | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
citrix | EVENT | 0.88+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
google cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
u.s department | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
vice president | PERSON | 0.8+ |
second thought | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
homeland security | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
citrix workplace summit | EVENT | 0.78+ |
every single day | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
lot | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
citrix | TITLE | 0.73+ |
citrix cloud summit | EVENT | 0.71+ |
lot of | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
one of the quotes | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
security alliance | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
vice president | PERSON | 0.61+ |
interviews | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
these | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
investment | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
gc | ORGANIZATION | 0.59+ |
so many great applications | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
a few months | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
kobe | PERSON | 0.46+ |
Eric Herzog, IBM & Sam Werner, IBM | CUBE Conversation, October 2020
(upbeat music) >> Announcer: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is a CUBE conversation. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with the CUBE, coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today for a CUBE conversation. we've got a couple of a CUBE alumni veterans who've been on a lot of times. They've got some exciting announcements to tell us today, so we're excited to jump into it, So let's go. First we're joined by Eric Herzog. He's the CMO and VP worldwide storage channels for IBM Storage, made his time on theCUBE Eric, great to see you. >> Great, thanks very much for having us today. >> Jeff: Absolutely. And joining him, I think all the way from North Carolina, Sam Werner, the VP of, and offering manager business line executive storage for IBM. Sam, great to see you as well. >> Great to be here, thank you. >> Absolutely. So let's jump into it. So Sam you're in North Carolina, I think that's where the Red Hat people are. You guys have Red Hat, a lot of conversations about containers, containers are going nuts. We know containers are going nuts and it was Docker and then Kubernetes. And really a lot of traction. Wonder if you can reflect on, on what you see from your point of view and how that impacts what you guys are working on. >> Yeah, you know, it's interesting. We talk, everybody hears about containers constantly. Obviously it's a hot part of digital transformation. What's interesting about it though is most of those initiatives are being driven out of business lines. I spend a lot of time with the people who do infrastructure management, particularly the storage teams, the teams that have to support all of that data in the data center. And they're struggling to be honest with you. These initiatives are coming at them, from application developers and they're being asked to figure out how to deliver the same level of SLAs the same level of performance, governance, security recovery times, availability. And it's a scramble for them to be quite honest they're trying to figure out how to automate their storage. They're trying to figure out how to leverage the investments they've made as they go through a digital transformation and keep in mind, a lot of these initiatives are accelerating right now because of this global pandemic we're living through. I don't know that the strategy's necessarily changed, but there's been an acceleration. So all of a sudden these storage people kind of trying to get up to speed or being thrown right into the mix. So we're working directly with them. You'll see, in some of our announcements, we're helping them, you know, get on that journey and provide the infrastructure their teams need. >> And a lot of this is driven by multicloud and hybrid cloud, which we're seeing, you know, a really aggressive move to before it was kind of this rush to public cloud. And that everybody figured out, "Well maybe public cloud isn't necessarily right for everything." And it's kind of this horses for courses, if you will, with multicloud and hybrid cloud, another kind of complexity thrown into the storage mix that you guys have to deal with. >> Yeah, and that's another big challenge. Now in the early days of cloud, people were lifting and shifting applications trying to get lower capex. And they were also starting to deploy DevOps, in the public cloud in order to improve agility. And what they found is there were a lot of challenges with that, where they thought lifting and shifting an application will lower their capital costs the TCO actually went up significantly. Where they started building new applications in the cloud. They found they were becoming trapped there and they couldn't get the connectivity they needed back into their core applications. So now we're at this point where they're trying to really, transform the rest of it and they're using containers, to modernize the rest of the infrastructure and complete the digital transformation. They want to get into a hybrid cloud environment. What we found is, enterprises get two and a half X more value out of the IT when they use a hybrid multicloud infrastructure model versus an all public cloud model. So what they're trying to figure out is how to piece those different components together. So you need a software-driven storage infrastructure that gives you the flexibility, to deploy in a common way and automate in a common way, both in a public cloud but on premises and give you that flexibility. And that's what we're working on at IBM and with our colleagues at Red Hat. >> So Eric, you've been in the business a long time and you know, it's amazing as it just continues to evolve, continues to evolve this kind of unsexy thing under the covers called storage, which is so foundational. And now as data has become, you know, maybe a liability 'cause I have to buy a bunch of storage. Now it is the core asset of the company. And in fact a lot of valuations on a lot of companies is based on its value, that's data and what they can do. So clearly you've got a couple of aces in the hole you always do. So tell us what you guys are up to at IBM to take advantage of the opportunity. >> Well, what we're doing is we are launching, a number of solutions for various workloads and applications built with a strong container element. For example, a number of solutions about modern data protection cyber resiliency. In fact, we announced last year almost a year ago actually it's only a year ago last week, Sam and I were on stage, and one of our developers did a demo of us protecting data in a container environment. So now we're extending that beyond what we showed a year ago. We have other solutions that involve what we do with AI big data and analytic applications, that are in a container environment. What if I told you, instead of having to replicate and duplicate and have another set of storage right with the OpenShift Container configuration, that you could connect to an existing external exabyte class data lake. So that not only could your container apps get to it, but the existing apps, whether they'll be bare-metal or virtualized, all of them could get to the same data lake. Wow, that's a concept saving time, saving money. One pool of storage that'll work for all those environments. And now that containers are being deployed in production, that's something we're announcing as well. So we've got a lot of announcements today across the board. Most of which are container and some of which are not, for example, LTO-9, the latest high performance and high capacity tape. We're announcing some solutions around there. But the bulk of what we're announcing today, is really on what IBM is doing to continue to be the leader in container storage support. >> And it's great, 'cause you talked about a couple of very specific applications that we hear about all the time. One obviously on the big data and analytics side, you know, as that continues to do, to kind of chase history of honor of ultimately getting the right information to the right people at the right time so they can make the right decision. And the other piece you talked about was business continuity and data replication, and to bring people back. And one of the hot topics we've talked to a lot of people about now is kind of this shift in a security threat around ransomware. And the fact that these guys are a little bit more sophisticated and will actually go after your backup before they let you know that they're into your primary storage. So these are two, really important market areas that we could see continue activity, as all the people that we talk to every day. You must be seeing the same thing. >> Absolutely we are indeed. You know, containers are the wave. I'm a native California and I'm coming to you from Silicon Valley and you don't fight the wave, you ride it. So at IBM we're doing that. We've been the leader in container storage. We, as you know, way back when we invented the hard drive, which is the foundation of almost this entire storage industry and we were responsible for that. So we're making sure that as container is the coming wave that we are riding that in and doing the right things for our customers, for our channel partners that support those customers, whether they be existing customers, and obviously, with this move to containers, is going to be some people searching for probably a new vendor. And that's something that's going to go right into our wheelhouse because of the things we're doing. And some of our capabilities, for example, with our FlashSystems, with our Spectrum Virtualize, we're actually going to be able to support CSI snapshots not only for IBM Storage, but our Spectrum Virtualize products supports over 500 different arrays, most of which aren't ours. So if you got that old EMC VNX2 or that HPE, 3PAR or aNimble or all kinds of other storage, if you need CSI snapshot support, you can get it from IBM, with our Spectrum Virtualize software that runs on our FlashSystems, which of course cuts capex and opex, in a heterogeneous environment, but gives them that advanced container support that they don't get, because they're on older product from, you know, another vendor. We're making sure that we can pull our storage and even our competitor storage into the world of containers and do it in the right way for the end user. >> That's great. Sam, I want to go back to you and talk about the relationship with the Red Hat. I think it was about a year ago, I don't have my notes in front of me, when IBM purchased Red Hat. Clearly you guys have been working very closely together. What does that mean for you? You've been in the business for a long time. You've been at IBM for a long time, to have a partner you know, kind of embed with you, with Red Hat and bringing some of their capabilities into your portfolio. >> It's been an incredible experience, and I always say my friends at Red Hat because we spend so much time together. We're looking at now, leveraging a community that's really on the front edge of this movement to containers. They bring that, along with their experience around storage and containers, along with the years and years of enterprise class storage delivery that we have in the IBM Storage portfolio. And we're bringing those pieces together. And this is a case of truly one plus one equals three. And you know, an example you'll see in this announcement is the integration of our data protection portfolio with their container native storage. We allow you to in any environment, take a snapshot of that data. You know, this move towards modern data protection is all about a movement to doing data protection in a different way which is about leveraging snapshots, taking instant copies of data that are application aware, allowing you to reuse and mount that data for different purposes, be able to protect yourself from ransomware. Our data protection portfolio has industry leading ransomware protection and detection in it. So we'll actually detect it before it becomes a problem. We're taking that, industry leading data protection software and we are integrating it into Red Hat, Container Native Storage, giving you the ability to solve one of the biggest challenges in this digital transformation which is backing up your data. Now that you're moving towards, stateful containers and persistent storage. So that's one area we're collaborating. We're working on ensuring that our storage arrays, that Eric was talking about, that they integrate tightly with OpenShift and that they also work again with, OpenShift Container Storage, the Cloud Native Storage portfolio from, Red Hat. So we're bringing these pieces together. And on top of that, we're doing some really, interesting things with licensing. We allow you to consume the Red Hat Storage portfolio along with the IBM software-defined Storage portfolio under a single license. And you can deploy the different pieces you need, under one single license. So you get this ultimate investment protection and ability to deploy anywhere. So we're, I think we're adding a lot of value for our customers and helping them on this journey. >> Yeah Eric, I wonder if you could share your perspective on multicloud management. I know that's a big piece of what you guys are behind and it's a big piece of kind of the real world as we've kind of gotten through the hype and now we're into production, and it is a multicloud world and it is, you got to manage this stuff it's all over the place. I wonder if you could speak to kind of how that challenge you know, factors into your design decisions and how you guys are about, you know, kind of the future. >> Well we've done this in a couple of ways in things that are coming out in this launch. First of all, IBM has produced with a container-centric model, what they call the Multicloud Manager. It's the IBM Cloud Pak for multicloud management. That product is designed to manage multiple clouds not just the IBM Cloud, but Amazon, Azure, et cetera. What we've done is taken our Spectrum Protect Plus and we've integrated it into the multicloud manager. So what that means, to save time, to save money and make it easier to use, when the customer is in the multicloud manager, they can actually select Spectrum Protect Plus, launch it and then start to protect data. So that's one thing we've done in this launch. The other thing we've done is integrate the capability of IBM Spectrum Virtualize, running in a FlashSystem to also take the capability of supporting OCP, the OpenShift Container Platform in a Clustered environment. So what we can do there, is on-premise, if there really was an earthquake in Silicon Valley right now, that OpenShift is sitting on a server. The servers just got crushed by the roof when it caved in. So you want to make sure you've got disaster recovery. So what we can do is take that OpenShift Container Platform Cluster, we can support it with our Spectrum Virtualize software running on our FlashSystem, just like we can do heterogeneous storage that's not ours, in this case, we're doing it with Red Hat. And then what we can do is to provide disaster recovery and business continuity to different cloud vendors not just to IBM Cloud, but to several cloud vendors. We can give them the capability of replicating and protecting that Cluster to a cloud configuration. So if there really was an earthquake, they could then go to the cloud, they could recover that Red Hat Cluster, to a different data center and run it on-prem. So we're not only doing the integration with a multicloud manager, which is multicloud-centric allowing ease of use with our Spectrum Protect Plus, but incase of a really tough situation of fire in a data center, earthquake, hurricane, whatever, the Red Hat OpenShift Cluster can be replicated out to a cloud, with our Spectrum Virtualize Software. So in most, in both cases, multicloud examples because in the first one of course the multicloud manager is designed and does support multiple clouds. In the second example, we support multiple clouds where our Spectrum Virtualize for public clouds software so you can take that OpenShift Cluster replicate it and not just deal with one cloud vendor but with several. So showing that multicloud management is important and then leverage that in this launch with a very strong element of container centricity. >> Right >> Yeah, I just want to add, you know, and I'm glad you brought that up Eric, this whole multicloud capability with, the Spectrum Virtualize. And I could see the same for our Spectrum Scale Family, which is our storage infrastructure for AI and big data. We actually, in this announcement have containerized the client making it very simple to deploy in Kubernetes Cluster. But one of the really special things about Spectrum Scale is it's active file management. This allows you to build out a file system not only on-premises for your, Kubernetes Cluster but you can actually extend that to a public cloud and it automatically will extend the file system. If you were to go into a public cloud marketplace which it's available in more than one, you can go in there click deploy, for example, in AWS Marketplace, click deploy it will deploy your Spectrum Scale Cluster. You've now extended your file system from on-prem into the cloud. If you need to access any of that data, you can access it and it will automatically cash you on locally and we'll manage all the file access for you. >> Yeah, it's an interesting kind of paradox between, you know, kind of the complexity of what's going on in the back end, but really trying to deliver simplicity on the front end. Again, this ultimate goal of getting the right data to the right person at the right time. You just had a blog post Eric recently, that you talked about every piece of data isn't equal. And I think it's really highlighted in this conversation we just had about recovery and how you prioritize and how you, you know, think about, your data because you know, the relative value of any particular piece might be highly variable, which should drive the way that you treated in your system. So I wonder if you can speak a little bit, you know, to helping people think about data in the right way. As you know, they both have all their operational data which they've always had, but now they've got all this unstructured data that's coming in like crazy and all data isn't created equal, as you said. And if there is an earthquake or there is a ransomware attack, you need to be smart about what you have available to bring back quickly. And maybe what's not quite so important. >> Well, I think the key thing, let me go to, you know a modern data protection term. These are two very technical terms was, one is the recovery time. How long does it take you to get that data back? And the second one is the recovery point, at what point in time, are you recovering the data from? And the reason those are critical, is when you look at your datasets, whether you replicate, you snap, you do a backup. The key thing you've got to figure out is what is my recovery time? How long is it going to take me? What's my recovery point. Obviously in certain industries you want to recover as rapidly as possible. And you also want to have the absolute most recent data. So then once you know what it takes you to do that, okay from an RPO and an RTO perspective, recovery point objective, recovery time objective. Once you know that, then you need to look at your datasets and look at what does it take to run the company if there really was a fire and your data center was destroyed. So you take a look at those datasets, you see what are the ones that I need to recover first, to keep the company up and rolling. So let's take an example, the sales database or the support database. I would say those are pretty critical to almost any company, whether you'd be a high-tech company, whether you'd be a furniture company, whether you'd be a delivery company. However, there also is probably a database of assets. For example, IBM is a big company. We have buildings all over, well, guess what? We don't lease a chair or a table or a whiteboard. We buy them. Those are physical assets that the company has to pay, you know, do write downs on and all this other stuff, they need to track it. If we close a building, we need to move the desk to another building. Like even if we leasing a building now, the furniture is ours, right? So does an asset database need to be recovered instantaneously? Probably not. So we should focus on another thing. So let's say on a bank. Banks are both online and brick and mortar. I happened to be a Wells Fargo person. So guess what? There's Wells Fargo banks, two of them in the city I'm in, okay? So, the assets of the money, in this case now, I don't think the brick and mortar of the building of Wells Fargo or their desks in there but now you're talking financial assets or their high velocity trading apps. Those things need to be recovered almost instantaneously. And that's what you need to do when you're looking at datasets, is figure out what's critical to the business to keep it up and rolling, what's the next most critical. And you do it in basically the way you would tear anything. What's the most important thing, what's the next most important thing. It doesn't matter how you approach your job, how you used to approach school, what are the classes I have to get an A and what classes can I not get an A and depending on what your major was, all that sort of stuff, you're setting priorities, right? And the dataset, since data is the most critical asset of any company, whether it's a Global Fortune 500 or whether it's Herzog Cigar Store, all of those assets, that data is the most valuable. So you've got to make sure, recover what you need as rapidly as you need it. But you can't recover all of it. You just, there's just no way to do that. So that's why you really ranked the importance of the data to use sameware, with malware and ransomware. If you have a malware or ransomware attack, certain data you need to recover as soon as you can. So if there, for example, as a, in fact there was one Jeff, here in Silicon Valley as well. You've probably read about the University of California San Francisco, ended up having to pay over a million dollars of ransom because some of the data related to COVID research University of California, San Francisco, it was the health care center for the University of California in Northern California. They are working on COVID and guess what? The stuff was held for ransom. They had no choice, but to pay them. And they really did pay, this is around end of June, of this year. So, okay, you don't really want to do that. >> Jeff: Right >> So you need to look at everything from malware and ransomware, the importance of the data. And that's how you figure this stuff out, whether be in a container environment, a traditional environment or virtualized environment. And that's why data protection is so important. And with this launch, not only are we doing the data protection we've been doing for years, but now taking it to the heart of the new wave, which is the wave of containers. >> Yeah, let me add just quickly on that Eric. So think about those different cases you talked about. You're probably going to want for your mission critically. You're going to want snapshots of that data that can be recovered near instantaneously. And then, for some of your data, you might decide you want to store it out in cloud. And with Spectrum Protect, we just announced our ability to now store data out in Google cloud. In addition to, we already supported AWS Azure IBM Cloud, in various on-prem object stores. So we already provided that capability. And then we're in this announcement talking about LTL-9. And you got to also be smart about which data do you need to keep, according to regulation for long periods of time, or is it just important to archive? You're not going to beat the economics nor the safety of storing data out on tape. But like Eric said, if all of your data is out on tape and you have an event, you're not going to be able to restore it quickly enough at least the mission critical things. And so those are the things that need to be in snapshot. And that's one of the main things we're announcing here for Kubernetes environments is the ability to quickly snapshot application aware backups, of your mission critical data in your Kubernetes environments. It can very quickly to be recovered. >> That's good. So I'll give you the last word then we're going to sign off, we are out of time, but I do want to get this in it's 2020, if I didn't ask the COVID question, I would be in big trouble. So, you know, you've all seen the memes and the jokes about really COVID being an accelerant to digital transformation, not necessarily change, but certainly a huge accelerant. I mean, you guys have a, I'm sure a product roadmap that's baked pretty far and advanced, but I wonder if you can speak to, you know, from your perspective, as COVID has accelerated digital transformation you guys are so foundational to executing that, you know, kind of what is it done in terms of what you're seeing with your customers, you know, kind of the demand and how you're seeing this kind of validation as to an accelerant to move to these better types of architectures? Let's start with you Sam. >> Yeah, you know I, and I think i said this, but I mean the strategy really hasn't changed for the enterprises, but of course it is accelerating it. And I see storage teams more quickly getting into trouble, trying to solve some of these challenges. So we're working closely with them. They're looking for more automation. They have less people in the data center on-premises. They're looking to do more automation simplify the management of the environment. We're doing a lot around Ansible to help them with that. We're accelerating our roadmaps around that sort of integration and automation. They're looking for better visibility into their environments. So we've made a lot of investments around our storage insights SaaS platform, that allows them to get complete visibility into their data center and not just in their data center. We also give them visibility to the stores they're deploying in the cloud. So we're making it easier for them to monitor and manage and automate their storage infrastructure. And then of course, if you look at everything we're doing in this announcement, it's about enabling our software and our storage infrastructure to integrate directly into these new Kubernetes, initiatives. That way as this digital transformation accelerates and application developers are demanding more and more Kubernetes capabilities. They're able to deliver the same SLAs and the same level of security and the same level of governance, that their customers expect from them, but in this new world. So that's what we're doing. If you look at our announcement, you'll see that across, across the sets of capabilities that we're delivering here. >> Eric, we'll give you the last word, and then we're going to go to Eric Cigar Shop, as soon as this is over. (laughs) >> So it's clearly all about storage made simple, in a Kubernetes environment, in a container environment, whether it's block storage, file storage, whether it be object storage and IBM's goal is to offer ever increasing sophisticated services for the enterprise at the same time, make it easier and easier to use and to consume. If you go back to the old days, the storage admins manage X amount of gigabytes, maybe terabytes. Now the same admin is managing 10 petabytes of data. So the data explosion is real across all environments, container environments, even old bare-metal. And of course the not quite so new anymore virtualized environments. The admins need to manage that more and more easily and automated point and click. Use AI based automated tiering. For example, we have with our Easy Tier technology, that automatically moves data when it's hot to the fastest tier. And when it's not as hot, it's cool, it pushes down to a slower tier, but it's all automated. You point and you click. Let's take our migration capabilities. We built it into our software. I buy a new array, I need to migrate the data. You point, you click, and we automatic transparent migration in the background on the fly without taking the servers or the storage down. And we always favor the application workload. So if the application workload is heavy at certain times a day, we slow the migration. At night for sake of argument, If it's a company that is not truly 24 by seven, you know, heavily 24 by seven, and at night, it slows down, we accelerate the migration. All about automation. We've done it with Ansible, here in this launch, we've done it with additional integration with other platforms. So our Spectrum Scale for example, can use the OpenShift management framework to configure and to grow our Spectrum Scale or elastic storage system clusters. We've done it, in this case with our Spectrum Protect Plus, as you saw integration into the multicloud manager. So for us, it's storage made simple, incredibly new features all the time, but at the same time we do that, make sure that it's easier and easier to use. And in some cases like with Ansible, not even the real storage people, but God forbid, that DevOps guy messes with a storage and loses that data, wow. So by, if you're using something like Ansible and that Ansible framework, we make sure that essentially the DevOps guy, the test guy, the analytics guy, basically doesn't lose the data and screw up the storage. And that's a big, big issue. So all about storage made simple, in the right way with incredible enterprise features that essentially we make easy and easy to use. We're trying to make everything essentially like your iPhone, that easy to use. That's the goal. And with a lot less storage admins in the world then there has been an incredible storage growth every single year. You'd better make it easy for the same person to manage all that storage. 'Cause it's not shrinking. It is, someone who's sitting at 50 petabytes today, is 150 petabytes the next year and five years from now, they'll be sitting on an exabyte of production data, and they're not going to hire tons of admins. It's going to be the same two or four people that were doing the work. Now they got to manage an exabyte, which is why this storage made simplest is such a strong effort for us with integration, with the Open, with the Kubernetes frameworks or done with OpenShift, heck, even what we used to do in the old days with vCenter Ops from VMware, VASA, VAAI, all those old VMware tools, we made sure tight integration, easy to use, easy to manage, but sophisticated features to go with that. Simplicity is really about how you manage storage. It's not about making your storage dumb. People want smarter and smarter storage. Do you make it smarter, but you make it just easy to use at the same time. >> Right. >> Well, great summary. And I don't think I could do a better job. So I think we'll just leave it right there. So congratulations to both of you and the teams for these announcement after a whole lot of hard work and sweat went in, over the last little while and continued success. And thanks for the, check in, always great to see you. >> Thank you. We love being on theCUBE as always. >> All right, thanks again. All right, he's Eric, he was Sam, I'm I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE. We'll see you next time, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world. coming to you from our Great, thanks very Sam, great to see you as well. on what you see from your point of view the teams that have to that you guys have to deal with. and complete the digital transformation. So tell us what you guys are up to at IBM that you could connect to an existing And the other piece you talked and I'm coming to you to have a partner you know, and ability to deploy anywhere. of what you guys are behind and make it easier to use, And I could see the same for and how you prioritize that the company has to pay, So you need to look at and you have an event, to executing that, you know, of security and the same Eric, we'll give you the last word, And of course the not quite so new anymore So congratulations to both of you We love being on theCUBE as always. We'll see you next time,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Herzog | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sam Werner | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Wells Fargo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Wells Fargo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
50 petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
North Carolina | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
150 petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
University of California | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
both cases | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second example | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Eric Cigar Shop | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Herzog Cigar Store | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
OpenShift | TITLE | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
DevOps | TITLE | 0.98+ |
over 500 different arrays | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
end of June | DATE | 0.98+ |
four people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
vCenter Ops | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Bobby Allen, Tech Evangelist | CUBE Conversation, October 2020
>> Narrator: From the Cube studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a Cube conversation. >> Hey, welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with theCUBE, coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today for a Cube conversation. I'm really excited to have our next guest on. You see them all over on social, a very active community member. And we have not heard from him for a little while, so I'm psyched to have him on. He's Bobby Allen. He is a tech and Cloud evangelist. Bobby, how you doing? >> I'm good, Jeff, how are you? >> Good, so, I'm just to have the obligatory check-in. So, you're getting through this madness of COVID, and family's good, everything's good? >> Yeah, everybody's good. I've got a teen and a twin. They haven't driven us crazy yet. So, so far, everybody's healthy and everybody's good. >> Good, good. So, let's jump into it, Bobby. You know, people talk about Cloud as being, there's a lot of great benefits to Cloud, you know, kind of, cost savings, and agility, and more importantly, really as a driver of innovation which I think most people are kind of late to the party there, they think really more on cost savings versus innovation, but now, it's been around, you know, AWS has been around kind of, broke open the door in terms of public Cloud, and then everything was a public Cloud and not because of public Cloud, and then we have hybrid Cloud and we have multicloud. And now, things are kind of, settling down. So, when you talk to people about Cloud, how should they think about the reality of it once they kind of, leave the trade show and they're getting back to their desk, and they actually have to start implementing some things? >> So, great question, Jeff, First of all, thank you for giving me that opportunity to answer that. This is how I think about Cloud. So, we often talk about Cloud in terms of gym memberships, right? Like going to the Cloud is like buying a gym membership. I actually argue that the Cloud is actually more like weights. If you apply weights to a good form you're going to get stronger, if you apply weights to a bad form you're going to hurt yourself. And what we found is that a lot of these companies, Jeff, are applying Cloud and automation to things that really didn't make a lot of sense. And so, they're wasting more money, they're getting more frustrated, and they're wondering why Cloud was not this magic bullet that just solved everything. It didn't fix world peace and global hunger, and now, they're worse off than they were before. There are a couple of reasons I can go into about that but hopefully, that answers the question at first. We're training the wrong way, Jeff. We're adding weight to things that don't make sense and we're hurting ourselves. >> So, it it just I picked the wrong application or are they operating it in a way as they operated it when it was on-prem? 'Cause the thing I always think of, which is interesting, right? Is everybody always talks about spinning up capacity, right? Spin up capacity. You're running a promotion on the Superbowl, and you're going to have a bunch of people hitting your coupon but they'd never talk about spinning it down. And I went to a really interesting presentation one time where a guy talked about their application. He's like, we like when you turn it off, when you turn off our application, we're not making any money, but it tells that you know, kind of how to operate this thing, which is turn it on, but don't forget to turn it off. And I think, you know, we had a situation on one of our little applications that we left open and let something run and ended up with a bill that we weren't necessarily anticipating, not because we did anything wrong, but we just didn't do the right thing, which was to turn off that particular service when we didn't need it. So, what's the wrong way, what's the wrong exercise? Why are people screwing this up? >> So, I think the problem, Jeff, is actually more upstream. So, my personal mantra for 2020 has been, tech is the easy part, data and behavior are the hard parts. And I think you nailed it, right? That Cloud is only about what you need to buy, not what you need to change, then you're going to be woefully disappointed with the results. And so, when I'm saying go upstream, what I'm finding is, missed expectations, Jeff, sink more projects than bad code broken APIs or large bills? The thing that we're missing is, we're thinking that technology replaces the need to have a conversation. So, for example, when we say we want to do something better in the Cloud, what does better actually mean? So, let's talk about food for a second. Hopefully, I don't make your people hungry 'cause it's around lunchtime. But if we think about Cloud application like a recipe, are we tryna make a mediocre recipe better or make a good recipe at scale, right? 'Cause if you take a nasty recipe and scale it out, you're just going to go broke faster. So, really the question is, which problem are we trying to solve? What is the issue that we're really wrestling with? And so, we need to have a better vocabulary, more descriptive conversations. And so, let me give you one that I often talk to customers about, right? We talk about technical debt a lot of times. And technical debt, Jeff, in my opinion, is being used as a misnomer. So, they're kind of, different sorts of debt that I see often in the C-suite. So, there's technical debt where I don't like what we're running, there's data debt where I don't know what we're running, and there's brain debt where I don't know what we want. And Jeff, I would argue that a lot of things that are masquerading as technical debt in the C-suite are really brain debt. I haven't figured out what we want to do, I haven't thought about what we're willing and able to change. And so, that's why the Cloud is a disappointment because we haven't figured out what we want for lunch. (laughs) >> So, it's a classic like people process technology program, you know, problem. And we hear about it all the time, right? And everyone loves to focus on the technology. I haven't heard it really explained that well, but that's what you're saying. It's like, we'll just jump to that part so we don't have to actually ask the hard questions, right? And the thing that makes me think of it when you talked about that is it's kind of like the whole data aggregation problem and all the big data adventures when half the time people don't know what data is where, so, even just going through the exercise of cataloging, finding, organizing, cleansing, all that kind of stuff before you really start to think about what can you do with the big data project? You got to get the baseline down before you can get into the fancy stuff. Sounds kind of like, what you're talking about. >> You nailed it, Jeff. And I'm actually going to piggyback on something you said. This is actually the problem that I think we're wrestling with in Cloud and in life. There it is, right? And we're got to put a fine point in it for the listeners. We are struggling, Jeff, with how to evaluate better versus different. And so, what Cloud has done more importantly, Cloud has shortened the amount of time that we're willing to spend on something before we just start over again. And so, the question that we wrestle with is, do I need to do the same thing a little bit differently? Do I need to tweak it or is there something better that's come along where I need to throw everything away, start all over again, and wipe the slate clean. And so, here's what ends up happening, right? The challenge that we have building on that is how we choose, Jeff, is more important than what we choose because a lot of us are making choices but we're not developing a framework to choose in a world where different things are pushed at us really every day and every night, right? Amazon and Azure are changing literally thousands of things every night. And if I feel like there's something new out there, I have to understand, is this noise, or is this something I pay attention to? Is this a size for a project or is this something that helps my value? If you don't have a way to choose, Jeff, every new option is going to just lead to more confusion and more decommitment. >> Right, well, I mean, you raised a really interesting point which is how do CIOs keep up with all this stuff? I mean, how do they possibly keep the lights on, you know, run digital transformation, kind of, keep up with the, Lord knows, how many changes like you said, get made at Amazon every single day I mean, the feature set when Andy stands on stage at re-invent and lists all the services. I think he's using like a two-and-a-half point font on a 200 foot video screen. I mean, there's so much there. So, how do you help people take a step back from, it's like driving, you know, a car with headlights through snow at night. You know, it's just like kuchu chu chu. How do you help people take a step back and be a little bit more thoughtful, a little bit more intentional, a little bit more circumspect to lay a good foundation which is going to be what the rest of the house is built on. If you don't have it, it's just going to crumble, if you have it, then at least you have a chance of success. How do you help guide them and get out of that snow storm? >> So, I'm going to give you a new acronym, Jeff, but I think it starts with humility. It starts with us admitting that we don't have this all figured out yet. I often tell a lot of customers, Cloud is that best a teenager that just learned how to drive. And Cloud similar to teenagers, the ability of what it can do is, kind of, in conflict with what it can comprehend in terms of unintended consequences. And so, if Cloud is changing all the time, let's not talk about, we crushed it, we nailed it, we knocked it out of the park. Let's raise our hand and say, you know what? I humbly need some help, because here's what we do, Jeff. In this industry, we throw around acronyms and terms all the time. IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, BDaaS, DBaaS, whatever. I'm going to introduce the term CaaS, but that's not containers as a service job. I think what we're getting is confusion as a service. (laughs) There's so many things that are changing that people are overwhelmed but because we want to act so much like we're crushing it on social media, we really need to say, I need help, I can't do this in a spreadsheet anymore. Please are there solutions out there that can help me automate some of this stuff so that I'm not a victim of my own ignorance. So, humility, right? Embrace other people that have solved some of this problem before, somebody has solved this problem. There are companies out there that are taking in the data, that are automating the decision-making, and that can help you, right? Bring people in, bringing outside help. >> Right, well, the other piece you just talked on is automation, and it goes back to your earlier comment about, you know, scale, bad things at scale are not good. So, if you don't get things dialed in now, and you start applying automation, and you start applying machine speed, you know, then things can get really squirrely really quick. So, that's even another kind of, you know, danger zone coming ahead, start to plan and make sure you've got your stuff organized or now you're going to automate it at machine speed, IOT, 5G, and really run things ragged super quickly. >> Jeff, I agree a hundred percent with that. I want to go back to something you talked about before. People process technology. I want to tweak that. I think we really need to evolve into people, process, product, or people, process, problem. It's got to go back to what am I creating or what am I solving this helping someone? And the technology is something that I will use or not if that helps me meet that outcome. But as technologists, Jeff, a lot of us are getting lazy. I want to play with Kubernetes. I want to play with containers. I want to play with serverless. I want to play with IOT. Who is that actually solving a problem for? Is what we've got to come back to because if I'm not doing that, the less you submit that I'm playing with this, but I'm not really making something better for a customer or adding more value to the business. >> So, again, what are your tips and tricks? 'Cause things are not going to get less complicated, right? As we've talked about Amazon's rolling out new services all the time. Google is really starting, you know, Google Cloud is really starting to rage. Obviously, Satya has done an amazing job with Microsoft, and then there's Oracle Cloud and IBM Cloud, and all these secondary Clouds, Equinix, and that acceleration is only going up. So, how do you, you know encourage people, coach people, tell people to make sure that they're taking a step back and being organized and thoughtful, and not just racing ahead at the next bright shiny object? >> So, great question again, Jeff. I think people have to have to be careful that just because you hear about something a lot doesn't mean it's proven to scale. Social media is dangerous in the sense that we think that we hear something a hundred times then a means that is polished. And I think that as enterprises and as businesses, you know, go with something that's proven, but dip a toe in the water, if you're not sure about it. So, maybe you are experimenting with some things in DevTests, but here's some practical tips that I'll give. Three things, right? I recommend that people typically start here with Cloud strategy, the three D's of data are what I recommend people begin with. Don't begin with the widgets, the shiny objects, begin with data storage, begin with data transport and begin with data organization. We know that data is the lifeblood of the enterprise, right? That's what all of us are focused on right now, right? Data is collected from watches, from websites, from things like self-driving cars, eventually. So, how is my data going to be stored? 'Cause that's the most important part of likely what we're doing as a corporation. How is it going to be transported? Am I okay with spending X amount of dollars on Egress? Do I have latency issues? And then when it comes to data organization, databases, data warehouses, data lakes, I would start with my philosophy, Jeff, on how I plan to leverage that information across any of the multi or hybrid providers that I plan to spin up, because if I start with the data that connects me better to the customer, how am I going to leverage this data then make something better for them? And then any venue honestly, Jeff, that I choose to execute in we'll have tools and utilities and packages that I can leverage to make something better for someone. >> The piece you didn't mention though, was the application. So, where's the application? Say you still start with the data foundationally, and then go to the application or? >> Yes. >> But most of the initiatives driven kind of, at the application level layer? >> They are, and I'm glad you mentioned that. So, practically speaking, let me go down a level to double-click on stuff. Well, people want to be Cloud native, right? 'Cause we don't want to run servers. We don't want to run boxes, we don't even really want to do VMS anymore. One thing that I recommend, that I believe is high reward and low risk is that people strongly consider adopting database as a service, and this is the reason why. It gives us a format to go to something that's Cloud native that doesn't have to be totally rewritten. So, the juice is worth the squeeze there because I'm reducing labor, I'm reducing maintenance, I'm reducing cycles, the DBaaS that people like that have to do, but I'm not paying to refactor an application. Where we struggle, Jeff, and maybe this is another topic, we really struggle with the value of applications, and because we don't know the value of an app, we're using the cost of an app as a proxy. And so, if you don't know the value of something, you're always going to be at risk of over or under improving it. This is why I like database as a service. I can be more nimble, I can reduce labor, and I'm not rewriting an application and spending more to rewrite it than the app is worth. If I totally refactor, or if I totally replatform, the cost may outstrip the value. DBaaS is almost always a slam dunk, 'cause I'm going to reduce manual things that my people are doing that freeze them up, to focus more on customers and evolve in the end. That's what I see pretty consistently in the enterprise. >> That is really scary. That statement that you said that people don't necessarily know the value of the app and using cost as a proxy is not good. You know, I had Butch Rizzo on recently, and he did a study on, you know, trying to figure out the value of data, versus the the value of an app. And he did some research of that UCSF, and what they did is they basically said the value of the data is dependent on the business process that you can improve, or the business project that you want to do. You make an estimate as to what the ROI in that process is, and then you basically see if it's worthwhile to do. And that case and point was, you know, running a promotion at Chipola 'cause bill loves Chipola, but he had a real concrete way that, you know, if we can increase sales at the target stores by, you know, 10%, or we can increase the average ticket by 20 cents or we can increase the average number of items ordered by 0.5 or whatever. So, you know, real far metrics that tie back to real numbers, that tie back to value that you can make an assessment of that project, and that project is enabled by data. So, I hope people are doing that far applications 'cause cost is not the way to figure out value >> The challenge that we have, Jeff, when we look at a lot of the things in the Cloud, there's a big difference between if I have "big C" customers, someone who's literally pulling out a wallet or a credit card to pay for my service or product versus "little C" customers like internally. If I'm paying for a streaming service, and the cost of the streaming service goes up the value of that's likely also going up because I'm serving more big C customers. If the cost of a password reset manager goes up and internal application that nobody was likely paying for, and that's really the dilemma that a lot of folks have in the enterprise, Jeff. Am I going to take something that has limited value like a password application, and put it in a place that can have unlimited spend. Now, if I'm a Netflix or Disney plus, if my spend is going up, my value is going up because I'm serving more big C people that are going to pull out their credit card and give me money. So, a lot of the struggle is when we drill down into this in the enterprise is the people that have the little C customers that don't have anybody paying them 'cause they're tryna understand this is like funny money in our houses job. My kids are teenagers. If I was to charge them, right? For room and board or for dinner, they don't have any money. So, the value of what they think about my cooking on the weekend, right? It's hard to put a value on that because they're not paying me, but if I had a food truck, it's easy to put a value on that, are people buying it or not? So, again, the challenges between internal or external customers and asked me to get any things I charged back and show back, we need a model to understand, is this something that you're tolerating or something that you're actually choosing and are you willing to spend money on it? >> Yeah, and it's a complicated issue, right? Because the other thing is you'd say, you take this conversation over to the security space, which I always find fascinating 'cause investigating security is kind of like investing in insurance and you can't use all your money to insure everything a hundred percent or else you just, why would you even do it? But you have to have some, and it's not a real clear ROI, but the potential downside is pretty huge. So, it's this kind of, balancing act, as you said, it's not really clean as to what the true value of that is unless you tie it back to some specific event, a breach, you know, some type of pins getting stolen, et cetera. So, these are not hard questions, but it's funny 'cause they're not technology questions, right? They're business value questions, and they're priority questions, and they're trade off questions. That's the other thing, right? You don't have infinite resources. So, even if you solve the model here you need to solve it within a portfolio of challenges, opportunities to then, as you said, you know, kind of rank order, where do you spend that next version of dollar? 'Cause it really can have a very a huge difference on the return. >> Okay, I think if I was going to give a, maybe a final piece of advice to the audience, Jeff, it would be to not confuse planning and analysis. That's something that I've talked about before. There's a big difference between those two things, and I often use the analogy of tax planning versus tax preparation. Jeff, when we collect our receipts, and our W-2s and 1099s, and go to our CPA at the beginning of the next year, we can't call that tax planning. That's tax preparation. It's already kind of done and dusted as long as you don't mess it up, it's pretty much a foregone conclusion. And the enterprise is doing a lot of analysis and a lot of preparation, but really we need to do more planning. We need to look at the tools and the companies that are helping us simulate and plan for the future that's coming because then when we're talking about it, right? When you're sitting with your CPA and you're saying, what if I do this with my retirement or 401k, or real estate assets, when they can talk to you about what might happen, right? You're not in crisis, it's not a fire drill, it's not a dumpster fire, you can have a very easy conversation around the pros and cons of that. So, I think that's one thing we really have to embrace is press ahead, talk to those consultants and those solution providers, is this really planning or is this just analysis? Is this looking backwards or is it really looking forward and giving me some insight into the things that are coming so that I feel smarter going into the next season? >> And the opportunity to make a change before you hit December 31st. I mean, I think that's a really great analogy. Well, Bobby, a lot of great stuff squeezed in in a few short minutes, it's super fun to catch up, and I just love all your analogies and your stories because at the end of the day, it is about people, and it's about priorities, and it's about business, it's not about the technology. So, thank you so much for sharing your insight. >> Thank you, Jeff. Thanks for having me. >> Oh, absolutely, all right. He's Bobby Allen, I'm Jeff Frick. You're watching theCUBE from our Palo Alto studio. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (bright music)
SUMMARY :
Narrator: From the Cube coming to you from our have the obligatory check-in. So, so far, everybody's and they're getting back to their desk, I actually argue that the Cloud but it tells that you know, And I think you nailed it, right? and all the big data And so, the question and lists all the services. that are taking in the data, and it goes back to your the less you submit that and that acceleration is only going up. We know that data is the lifeblood and then go to the application or? and evolve in the end. And that case and point was, you know, So, the value of what they to then, as you said, they can talk to you about And the opportunity to make a change Thanks for having me. We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
UCSF | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bobby Allen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cloud | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
December 31st | DATE | 0.99+ |
200 foot | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 cents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
October 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Chipola | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Bobby | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
0.5 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Superbowl | EVENT | 0.99+ |
two-and-a-half point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Three things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Egress | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Satya | PERSON | 0.97+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
next year | DATE | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
COVID | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Azure | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
one time | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
DevTests | TITLE | 0.94+ |
hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
twin | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
SaaS | TITLE | 0.93+ |
One thing | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
IaaS | TITLE | 0.91+ |
Equinix | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
DBaaS | TITLE | 0.88+ |
PaaS | TITLE | 0.87+ |
BDaaS | TITLE | 0.86+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
things | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
hundred times | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
1099s | OTHER | 0.81+ |
Tamara McCleary, Thulium | Citrix Workspace Summit
>> Announcer: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE Conversation. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE coming to you from our Palo Alto studios for a CUBE Conversation. We're talking about the Citrix Workspace Summit. It happened earlier today. And we've got one of the experts in the field, CUBE alumni and always a really fun guest to have on. Let's give a welcome to Tamara McCleary. She's coming to us from Colorado. She's the CEO of Thulium but you know her from social media and seeing her at all the conferences and speaking. And Tamara, it's great to see you again >> Jeff, it's so good to be here. Hey, next best thing to being in person, right? >> Absolutely. I mean, there is some good stuff. Neither of us had to get on an airplane today and we were able just to connect via the magic of the internet, which I think people forget how magic it truly is. So I looked up, we last spoke, it was mid-April. We were about a month into this thing after the kind of shutdown. And really the topic there was about this light switch moment on the work from home front. Now we're seven months into this, eight months into this, and clearly it's not going away anytime soon. And even when it does, it's not going to go back exactly to the way it was. So first off, how are you doing? 'Cause I know you spend a lot of time at conferences and traveling all over the world, so your life's been changed quite a bit. And then two, just your kind of perspective as we've moved from the light switch moment to the, that this is the new normal and will be the new normal going forward. Maybe not exactly how it is today, but we're not going back to the way that it was before. >> You couldn't be more spot on, Jeff. In fact, when you said April, to me, it almost feels like not seven months. It feels much longer ago. And since the last time I got on an airplane was the end of February, and that was a huge disruption to me in my life. I had always been in three, four cities a week, every week, and haven't traveled on an airplane since February. So the world is different, and it has shifted, and there's no going back. We can't step in the river twice and hit that same spot. I totally messed up that quote, but that's me. You're used to that already. >> Jeff: Exactly. >> But some things don't change. But I think when we look at work, and what we were talking about back in April is that now we're looking at the potential for kind of a hybrid approach, whether we're talking about work or even kids, some kids going back to school, there's a hybrid approach. And with that comes its own set of complexities that we have to consider. So not only has the culture shifted into a place where you have your workforce who has gotten used to working remotely, and there's a lot of things with working remotely that we didn't have when office was the centrical focus for the workplace. So there's a lot of flexibility when you work from home. And I think one of the interesting things with the Citrix Workspace Summit was when CEO David Henshall talked about how it's the people, right? So it's our workforce, our employees who are our most valuable, but also our most costly assets. So we have to make sure that the employee experience is one that is pleasing and helps us to have not only talent acquisition, but also talent retention in a really dynamic, competitive atmosphere. And I'm sure I just posed this question so we could go a million different places with this. Where do you want to go with it, Jeff? >> Well, I was going to say, and of course we can go forever, and we don't have forever, so at some point we'll have to stop talking at the end of this interview. But I just love having you on. And what I want to drill in is as we've talked about the new way to work for a very, very long time. This is not a new topic. And we've had remote work tools and we've had VPNs and we've had mobile phones now since 2007, but we didn't have this forcing function, and I think that's what's really different here is that now it wasn't a choice anymore. There was no more planning and talking about it and maybe or maybe not. Work from home was kind of a first-class citizen in terms of priority. COVID changed all that dramatically overnight. And it's driven home this other kind of concept which we talk a lot about generically in terms of the customer experience as they interact with our applications, which is the way that now they actually interact with the company. And we've talked a little bit about new way to work, but now it's really driven to the forefront, because as you said, there's a lot of benefits from working from home. You could eat dinner with your family, maybe can pick up a few more of the kids' activities, whether it's a sports game in the middle of the afternoon or something in the evening, but there's also a lot of stress. There's a lot of kind of this always on and this constant notifications, whether it's coming from email or text or Slack or Teams or Asana or whatever. So refocusing on the employee experience and elevating that up into a much more important thing, as you said, for both wellness and employee satisfaction, but also retention and getting new employees. It's really changed the priority of that whole set of, kind of point of view around the employee experience that wasn't there kind of pre-COVID. >> Absolutely. And I think you just tapped onto something that I think affects all of us who are juggling these multifaceted lives, and that is the constant interruption and distraction, and that costs money. And I think about that as the CEO of our organization is that how many of these distractions could be avoided to create efficiency and productivity. It also creates happiness for the individual. I don't think anybody likes to be constantly distracted, but when you have a bunch of different applications and you don't have them in one accessible place and you're constantly having to flip between these applications, it can cause a lot of friction and frustration. And I think genuinely that was my very first introduction to Citrix was the ability to really streamline and have everything in one place on a beautiful dashboard that was personalized to the individual. Not everybody in the organization needs to have all the applications, right? Some of your employees only need a few, and it just depends on who they are and what they're doing within the organization. And so I think decreasing that friction, making it easier for people, and certainly ensuring not only a frictionless experience at home but also ensuring security is huge. I mean, how many times have we talked about cybersecurity is not a bolt on afterwards. It has to be all the way up through the stack. And certainly we did have an increased threat landscape with work from home situations because there were all these security breaches and issues and vulnerabilities. So I know we're not talking security today, but I'm wild about it. But I think that all of these things, what I like about what Citrix is doing, and I enjoy the Summit, is the fact that they're blending everything into a single solution so that it just gets done. Work gets done from wherever you are, whether you're at home, you're in office, or in your car, work gets done. >> And not only work but I thought the theme that's interesting that came out in David's keynote is our best work. It's good work and high-value work. And there's really kind of two aspects of that. One, as you just said, is please help me with the distractions and use machine learning and artificial intelligence and this unified platform to decide whether I should or should not be distracted. Also help me prioritize what I should be working on kind of right now, which, again, a great opportunity for AI and ML to elevate that which is most important to the top of my inbox. But even more in one of the keynotes was integrating the concept of wellness, and not just wellness in the HR manual at the back after vision and dental and getting your health checks, but wellness even where the application suggests that you take a two-hour window in this particular period of time to be thoughtful and do some deep thinking. And someone mentioned the people we talk about in automation and getting rid of drudgery and errors and all the bad stuff that comes from doing crappy work, not only is it not fun, but super error prone. This is a really different to use technology to help the employee, as you said, not only just get work done, but get good work done, get high-value work done, prioritize good stuff, and not just deal with the incessant henpecking that is the notification world that it's really easy to fall into if you don't turn some of that stuff off or at least tone them down a little bit. >> That's so true. I don't know if you saw this, but there a study by Stanford of, I think it was 16,000 workers, and over a nine-month period, they did this study, and it was a study looking at work from home and whether productivity was increased. And every, 'cause at first you remember what it was, Jeff. I mean, in the old regime, we would thought, oh dear, we don't want a remote workforce because everybody's going to be hanging out in their pajamas and screwing around and not doing work. And that's not true. What ends up happening is that this study showed that productivity increased by 13%. And, I mean, that's huge, right? So there was a huge bump in performance. And in this particular study, the variables that they cited was perhaps that they had a quieter workspace. I mean, you're not getting barraged by all the endless meetings, unless you have endless Zoom meetings, but that's a whole nother conversation. But you're having more time to focus and flexibility on when you work, which also increases focus. But I thought what you mentioned, the wellness piece was important, because then if you look at other studies, there was a Forbes article that cited that the average worker starts at 8:32 a.m. or something like that and works until 5:38 p.m. And I think the days of the week that were the most productive were Tuesday, Wednesdays, and Thursdays. But this was interesting, I thought. Telephone calls were up by 230%, so the calls that employees were making, and CRM activity was up by 176% and email up by 57% and chats up by 9%. So what we're seeing is that people are trying to find creative ways to remain connected and communicate, but in different ways. And I think that's where the wellness piece comes in and kind of what you were saying with that. I think it's a microapp that Citrix has on their Workspace, their workspace dashboard that pops up a reminder and says, hey, you think you should take a break or get up from your desk. But I think that what's nice about that is it's easy to get sucked into your computer all day. I'm guilty. I will definitely say I can start off pretty darn early in the morning or usually around by five and go till late at night. But, and it's all in front of the computer screen. So maybe I need that Citrix workspace solution to tap me on the shoulder and tell me to go take a meditation break. >> At least one of those watches that'll tell you to get up and twist around. Well, let's shift gears a little bit. They had Satya Nadella on, and Satya is a phenomenal executive, been super successful turning that big, very large boat, Microsoft, into really a cloud company and a SaaS company, and nothing but great success. Always happy to hear him. He had some interesting comments I want to run by you. One of them he said is we were dogmatic about work before, but don't replace what we were with just a new dogma. And what he really highlighted, A, obviously without the technology platform and cloud and all these tools that we have in place, this couldn't have happened. But more importantly, he said it really highlights the need for flexibility and resiliency, and to really, again, kind of elevate those as the first class citizens as to what you should be optimizing for. And really the highlight within this sudden shift with COVID that if you've got those capabilities, you're going to be successful, and if you don't, you're in real trouble >> I'm glad you brought Satya up, because he also said something really cool that I think is true, and that is we are running right now, currently we are running a global scale experiment. Do you remember him saying that? >> Yeah. >> And it's so true. I think right now the social scientists are going wild because finally they've got their captive collection of their study, their guinea pigs. But the other thing he was saying, too, is that we're going to be harnessing all these technologies to be able to re-skill and up-skill. And how long have we been talking about this, Jeff, with the future of work, that it will be a re-skilling and up-skilling of the workforce. He even mentioned holographic technology. He didn't go into it, but just the mention of it got me thinking about how we are currently using some of those nascent technologies to be able to up-skill and re-skill our workforces and also protect a workforce that doesn't necessarily need to be on scene on the edge of it all. And then he gave an example of an engineer being able to communicate with a first-line worker without having to be actually in the physical presence. And so I think this crucible that we're in called a global pandemic, forcing our hand, really, to do all the things that we've been talking about at all these conferences that we've been to, for me, maybe the past two decades, is that it's show, don't tell. So we're not talking about it anymore. We actually have to do it. And another thing that Satya said was that nine to five is definitely not true anymore with work. It's flexibility. And it's really... He also mentioned this EEG study into meeting fatigue. >> Jeff: Yes. >> I thought it was pretty wild. An EEG study into meeting fatigue. And I bet even without reading that study, all of us who are on video conferencing systems can probably tell what the outcome of that was. But concentration wanes very quickly. In fact, I think in that study it was after 20 minutes. But, so kudos to Citrix for putting on their summits, because did you notice for once we had the enjoyment of all these just really contents, deliciously packed segments that were short. >> Jeff: Right. >> Whereas at live events, they went on way too long. I mean, even customer stories went on way too long. And I really love the staccato nature of these customer stories and partnerships and what was working, and I just thought that they did a really nice job, and it was interesting because it met perfectly with staying underneath that 20-minute window before attention wanes. >> Right, right. And they even broke it up into three conferences, right? It was Citrix Synergy before. >> Right. >> Now it's workspaces, it's cloud, and then the third one will be security. But I want to double down on another concept. We talked about it last time with you and with Amy about measuring work and about kind of old work paradigms in terms of measuring performance that were really based more on activity than output. And this concept that work is an output, not a place. And it kind of makes you think of talking about cloud and a cloud-centric way of thinking about things. It's not necessarily the delivery method. It's about adopting quick change and rapid pace and having everything available that you need anywhere you are at the same time. So it seems strange to me that it took this to drive people to figure out that they should be measuring output and not activity. And were some early applications that came out when this all went down that are going to report back as to how often are you looking at your Zoom calls and how often are you sitting in front of your desk and all this silly stuff that just, again, misses the point. And I think this whole employee experience is, as you said, make 'em happy, make 'em feel fulfilled. They want to do meaningful work. They want to do high-value work. They just don't want to be an integration machine between the email system and the accounts receivable system and the accounts payable system. There's so much of an opportunity to get more value from the people, which, oh, by the way, makes for happier people. So do you think finally we're at a point where we can start getting away from just measuring activity unless that's your job to put a widget on a screw and really focus on output and high-value output and innovative output and deep thinking output versus just checking another box and passing the paper down the line? >> You know, Jeff, that reminds me of what Erica Volini, I think she's global human capital practice at Deloitte. I really loved her presentation. I also like the fact that I felt like she was speaking from her home, and she mentioned she's a new mom, and so there was this warmth and connection there which also I think is something really that we don't think about being, but it is a gift since we've all had to work from home is being able to see kind of executive individuals in a regular environment, and it humanizes it all, right? She said something really interesting in her talk. She was talking about rearchitecting the future of work, and she was talking about essentially, the premise was that human beings need, crave, have to have work that's meaningful and real. And part of this whole experience piece, part of this removing the friction from the experience of the employee and providing opportunities, stimulating growth opportunities for employees to give them that sense of meaning. But also she talked about the relationships. I mean, work is a huge part of the relationships in our life. And so this meaningful relationships and connections and in her architecting the work of the future, it's harnessing technology in service to humans to do a better job. And I think the word she used was augmentation, right? So the augmentation piece would be as we think about reinventing or re-imagining or re-architecting, we look at what's going to happen when we have the human working with the machine, but the machine in service to augmenting that human being to do, potential is what she was talking about, to really reach their potential. And so it's not about being replaced by technology. It's not being replaced by artificial intelligence, with machine learning algorithms. It's actually working in tandem so that technology potentiates the human that is using the technology. And I think that was a really good way of putting it. >> Right, right. I mean, we talk, it's one of our taglines, right? To separate the signal from the noise. And the problem is with so many systems now, and I forget, you may know off the top of your head, the average number of applications that people have to interact with every day to get their job done. >> Too many. >> Too many. >> Too many. >> It's a lot. So, so there is a lot of noise, but there's also some signal. And so if you're not paying attention, you can miss the signal that might be super, super important because you're overwhelmed by the noise. And so I think it is a real interesting challenge. It's a technology challenge to apply the machine learning and artificial intelligence, to sort through the total flow, to be able to prioritize and separate the signal from the noise to make sure we're working on the stuff that we should be working on. And I think it's a growing challenge as we just seem to always be adding new applications and adding new notifications and adding new systems that we have to interact with versus taking them away. So Citrix has this approach where we're just going to bring it all in together under one place. And so whether it's your Salesforce notification or your Slack notification or Zoom meeting, whatever, to have it orchestrated as a single place so I don't have 18 tabs, 14 browsers, and two laptops running just to get my day job done. >> You're going to make me self-conscious of all the tabs I have right now. Thanks a lot, Jeff. But, it's kind of, I like hearing stories, right? I think stories communicate to me kind of these practical applications. And I think Citrix did a brilliant job in the Workspace Summit of highlighting some of these customer stories that were really inspiring during the pandemic. One of 'em was City National Bank and Ariel Carrion? This is a test of my memory. He's the CTO, right, of City National Bank. And he's talking about that they had already had a partial migration to the cloud prior to the pandemic. So obviously there was an advantage for those organizations that already had their toe in the water. So, but when the pandemic hit, then it really catalyzed that movement all the way into the cloud and essentially creating a digital bank. And what was really interesting to me is that they funded 9600 loans and taking on new clients during that time of transformation to a digital bank. And one of the coolest things that he said to me was that in a regular program, it would've taken, mind you, get this. It would've taken 14 years, 14 years to accomplish what they did in three months. >> That's a long time. >> I was blown away, right? Just to me, that speaks a lot, because what we're talking about here is their clients are small business, and who do you think was impacted most during the pandemic? Small business. So the ability to get loans was critically important to the survival of a lot of companies. And the same story they had with eBay and David Lessor was talking, he's a senior manager in the office of the CIO, I think I remember. And he was talking about how obviously eBay is a digital platform, right? But if you think about the pandemic when we were all had these shelter in place orders, lots of people were able to still make money and earn a living because they were able to do business on eBay. And both eBay and City National Bank are obviously customers of Citrix. But I just found this to be really inspiring, because for eBay pre-pandemic, it was like, I don't know. I think they said they had 11,000 connected users prior to the pandemic, and a lot of those were in physical call centers. >> Jeff: Right. >> And then post-pandemic, I think he was reaching, saying end of Q4 was going to be something like 14,000 connected users. That's huge from 11 to 14. >> Yeah. >> And again, to your point, it's kind of forcing our hand into really not only pivoting, but increasing our speed in this ever-changing dynamic environment. >> Right. >> You know, one of the other things that came up, before I let you go, that it's always nice to have frameworks. Sometimes it just helps us organize our thoughts and it's kind of a mental cheat sheet. And they talked about the four Cs, connectivity, content, collaboration, and culture. And I would have to say they're in inverse order of how I would potentially have prioritized them. But I just wanted to zero in on the culture piece, 'cause I don't think people focus enough on culture. And one of the things I think we talked about in April, and I've certainly talked about a number of times going through this thing in leadership in these crazy times is that the frequency and the type and the topics in communication within your internal world have gone up dramatically. I think we had the, we had a CMO on the other day, and she said internal comms, this is a big company, prior to COVID was important, but not that important within the list of the CMO's activity. But then once this thing hit, right, suddenly internal communications, again, in terms of frequency and the types of topics you're talking about and the forums that you talk about and the actual vehicles in which you talk about, whether it's a all hands Zoom call or it's more frequent one-on-ones with your manager, really, really increase the importance of culture, and then I think probably is going to show over time the people that have it right, getting some separation distance from the people that got it wrong. I wonder if you could just talk about, 'cause you're a big culture person and you know how important the people part of the whole thing is. >> Yeah, culture drives everything. You're right. And that was Citrix's CIO who gave those four Cs, I think, Meerah Rajavel. >> Yeah, yeah. >> She gave those four Cs. And you couldn't be, you couldn't have tapped into something that I think is the soft underbelly of the organization, which is what is the culture. And anyone who's worked in an organization with a sick culture knows that it's just, it's cancerous, right? It grows and it causes decay. And I don't care how much innovation you have. If the culture is sick, you just, you're going to lose your best people. It's hard to work in a sick culture. And so I think what we had to do is when we all started working remotely, that was a culture shift, because we were siloed off of it. We weren't actually hanging out in physical space. Some of the things that we enjoyed about meeting with other human beings physically changed. And so it really behooved organizations to take a look at how they were going to foster culture digitally, how they were going to create that sense of bonding between not only those within your departmental area, but cross over into other areas. And I think that creating that culture that says I don't have to be in the exact same physical space, but we can still connect. I mean, you and I are doing this. We're not in the same physical space. >> Jeff: Right. >> But I'm still going to feel like we met today. >> Jeff: Right. >> You can create that for your employees. And it also means that we learned that we don't have to be in that same physical space, right? And I thought that was a really interesting position when Hayden Brown, the CEO of Upwork, was talking at the summit and saying that even when we look at creating culture with employees who aren't necessarily, maybe it's a workforce from all over the world that you're using, a remote workforce. And when you're using things like employees, if you've got work to do and you can find a really good talent and you can grab them for what it is that you need, you're actually increasing your ability to be able to deliver on things versus having to worry about whether you have that person in house, but you still can create that culture where everyone is inclusive, where someone can be in Australia and someone's in San Francisco and someone's in the UK, and you still have to create a cohesive, inclusive culture. And it matters not anymore whether or not you are a full-time employee or if you're a contract worker. I think in today's space, and certainly in those future of work conversations, it's more about, to the very first thing you said at the beginning, it's more about output. How's that for tying it back up again? >> Jeff: Yeah, very good. >> And that was totally unplanned. But it is about output, and that's going to be the future of work culture. It's not going to be the title that you have, whether or not you're a full-time employee or a part-time employee or a contract worker. It's going to be who are you meeting with? Who are you having these digital interfaces with and Slacking with or using any sort of platform application that you want to use. It's remaining in touch and in communication, and no longer is it about a physical space. It's a digital space. >> Right, right. All right, well, I'm going to give you the last word. You are a super positive person, and there's reasons, and for people that haven't watched your TED Talk, they should. I think it's super impactful and it really changed the way I look at you. So of all the negatives, wrap us up with some positives that you see as we come out of COVID that going through this experience will make in our lives, both our work lives as well as our personal lives. >> Well, since you're going to allow me to go deep here, I would say one of the things that COVID has brought us is pause. It caused us to go in. And with any dark night of the soul, we have to wrestle with the things that are real for us, and the things that fall away are those that were false, false perceptions, false ideas, illusions of even thinking who we are, what we're doing. And we had to come home to ourselves. And I think one of the things that COVID gave us through uncertainty was finding a center in that uncertainty. And maybe we got to know our beloveds a bit more. Maybe we got to know our kids a bit more, even if they drive us crazy sometimes. But in the end, I think maybe we all got to know ourselves a little bit more. And for that, I think we can harness those seeds of wisdom and make better choices in the future to co-create together a future that we are all pleased to wake up in, one that is fair, one that is equal, one that is inclusive, and one that we can be proud to have contributed to. And that's what I hope we've taken from this extremely hard time. >> Well, Tamara, thanks for sharing your wisdom with us. Really appreciate it. And great to see ya. >> Good to see you, too, thank you. >> All right, she's Tamara, I'm Jeff. You're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (bright music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world, And Tamara, it's great to see you again Jeff, it's so good to be here. And really the topic there was about and that was a huge that the employee experience and of course we can go forever, and that is the constant and all the bad stuff that and kind of what you and to really, again, and that is we are running right now, And so I think this crucible that we're in And I bet even without reading that study, And I really love the staccato nature And they even broke it up and passing the paper down the line? And I think that was a really And the problem is with and separate the signal from the noise that he said to me was that And the same story they had with eBay I think he was reaching, And again, to your point, and the forums that you talk about And that was Citrix's CIO Some of the things that we enjoyed about But I'm still going to and someone's in the UK, and that's going to be the and for people that haven't watched and one that we can be proud And great to see ya. We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Erica Volini | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Meerah Rajavel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Lessor | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tamara | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Colorado | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
City National Bank | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tamara McCleary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
14 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
April | DATE | 0.99+ |
two-hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
David Henshall | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eBay | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
14 browsers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
9600 loans | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Satya | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Citrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
18 tabs | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hayden Brown | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Deloitte | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20-minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Stanford | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
8:32 a.m. | DATE | 0.99+ |
13% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
February | DATE | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
TED Talk | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
16,000 workers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thulium | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
9% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
57% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thulium | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
230% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Wednesdays | DATE | 0.99+ |
Satya Nadella | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thursdays | DATE | 0.99+ |
two laptops | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
four cities | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
mid-April | DATE | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
176% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Upwork | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Citrix Workspace Summit | EVENT | 0.98+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two aspects | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
14,000 connected users | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Rajesh Janey, Dell Technologies, Uptal Bakshi & Satish Yadavali, Wipro | Dell Technologies World '20
>> Narrator: From around the globe it's theCUBE with digital coverage of Dell Technologies World. Digital experience brought to you by Dell Technologies. >> Welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of Dell Technology World. We've been covering Dell Tech World since it started really. It used to just be Dell World and there was EMC World after the merger and this is the all virtual version but we're excited to be here and we've got a great panel coming up. I think you're going to enjoy it. Our first guest is Rajesh Janey. He is the Senior Vice President of Global Alliances for APJ for Dell Technologies. Rajesh, where are you coming in from today? >> I'm speaking to you from Gurgaon, India. >> Awesome. It's the power of the virtual, right? It's not all bad that we don't have to get on planes all the time. >> Absolutely. >> And joining him is Utpal Bakshi. He is the Vice President and Global Vertical Head High Tech for Wipro. Utpal, good to see you. >> Nice to see you. >> And where are you calling us in from? >> I'm from Dallas, Texas. Actually suburb outside of Dallas called South Lake. >> Oh, excellent. Great to see you and again didn't have to get on a plane to do this so not all bad. And also joining us is Satish Yadavalli. He is the Vice President and Global Practice Head, Cloud and Infrastructure Services for Wipro. Satish, where are you joining us from? >> Hi, I'm joining from Bangalore, India. >> Excellent. Welcome. So gentlemen let's just jump into it. Wipro's a huge services firm, does a lot of work with Dell so I wonder Rajesh if you can talk really about the importance of partnerships and the importance of having somebody like Wipro within the Dell ecosystem. >> Absolutely. Thank you for having us on with Wipro. Wipro and we have had a partnership which is over two decades old and we have a multifaceted 360 degree kind of relationship with Wipro. Wipro is a platinum partner and what's more while we bring a lot of technology and products and the depth of product which are relevant to customer's transformation scenarios today, coupled with Wipro's consulting and services and design abilities this becomes an unbeatable power house so to say whereby we can work closely with a customer to help them transform and live in what we are calling the next normal. >> Yeah that's great. Utpal to you there's a lot of interesting trends going on. We've had cloud and big data been going on for a lot but really the talk in social media is what's driving your digital transformation, the CEO, the CIO or COVID and we all know what the answer is. So we've got a lot of new stuff in terms of digital transformation, working from anywhere, workforce transformation. Wonder if you can speak a little bit about how COVID has accelerated some of the priorities that your customers are trying to get done. >> Yeah. I think that's a great point. Wipro has been transforming over the last several years. We were a strong, large scale system integration partner, large IT organization but over the last several years we pivoted hard into the digital transformation world moving into the design side, leading the design, moving to cloud and helping our clients help make that journey and all of that got accelerated with the whole COVID situation. The work from home became all pervasive and the whole virtualization of the workforce really pivoted with some of our key transformational ideas around live workspace and the virtual desk which we've been working very closely with Dell have taken shape. So that has been a big part of our ongoing strategy. Doing the modernization off the network has also accelerated the customer networks and infrastructure was not necessarily set up for enabling these hybrid work environment. A lot of our clients are coming back and saying they want to modernize and actually accelerate. So that has all changed with COVID. Some of it is very positive actually for the business. >> Right. >> From an SI perspective. >> Satish, you've got cloud and infrastructure in your title. Public cloud really changed the game when Amazon kind of came on the scene and now we're seeing this evolution and change over time between a public cloud and hybrid cloud and multi cloud and cloud on cloud. I wonder if you could speak to and then even have an AWS inside of other people's clouds. They're trying to get it out there. The evolution of cloud both as a technology but really more as a way of thinking in terms of rapid deployment of new functionality to support the business and what you're seeing with your customers today. >> So let me share a perspective, right? Enterprises today are looking at options to extract greater value from hybrid cloud investment. It's a brownfield environment today where customers have their existing data centers but the hyperscalers have really come into play now and right cloud is the strategy which most of our customers embrace to address the market demands which are primarily focused on business outcomes today. As Wipro we have invested in developing a holistic extensible platform led approach called Wipro BoundaryLess Enterprise to drive business outcomes to customers. So the BLE construct is all about providing a ready to use plug-and-play platforms making IT easily consumable from multiple stakeholder personas be it admins, be it line of businesses, developers and partners. So basically we have built a holistic solution and our BLE solutions has majorly five building blocks. The first building block would be the BoundaryLess Data Center. The second is the BoundaryLess Container Platform. The third is the BoundaryLess Data Protection Platform. The fourth is the BoundaryLess Cloud Exchange where we get together all the internet connections and define the software defined network part to give access to the workloads across hybrid environments and the BoundaryLess Integration Platform which we call it as BLIP. Basically this is what we have put together to deliver an outcome to the customers powered by BLE. >> So BLE again, you call it the BoundaryLess Enterprise. What's the most important components of BLE? What are the things that most people are missing to actually implement the strategy? >> So if I actually build on you, right? The five building blocks let me elaborate in detail. The first is on the BoundaryLess Data Center. This enables our clients to deliver an infrastructure as a service across data centers and public clouds and enables customers to seamlessly move workloads from Edge to Cloud and manage them in a consistent and efficient model. That's the first building block of our BLE. The second important building block is container, right? We all know today container orchestration is key across hybrid cloud and with micro services and architectures becoming more prominent we see huge search for managing various Kubernetes enrollments with our clients. So our BLCP platform leverages solutions like VMware Tanzu, which is again a Dell company to enable clients manage the multicloud Kubernetes enrollments through a single pane of glass and provide seamless migration and movement of workloads across cloud environments. That's going to be the key in the future with microservices being dominant and every enterprise embracing microservices architectures this becomes very important building block in our overall solution. The third important stuff is BoundaryLess Data Protection. Now that data is all cross in hybrid cloud environment and application actually consume this data it is important to protect the data which is intellectual property and very critical to every business. So with the BLDP platform we ensure that we deliver availability, solidarity, security and reliability of cloud adoption increasingly and rapidly across multicloud platforms. So our solution leverages the DTC of Dell and other existing Dell storages and data production solutions to offer seamless and right cost models which will be very critical for any cloud transformation and schedules as we move forward. The fourth point which I was talking about is BLCE. This is basically a cloud exchange where in a hybrid cloud environment you need to establish connectivities across PaaS and SaaS platforms as well as on-premise networks to provide seamless access to data and the workloads which are in multicloud scenarios. So that's about BLCE. With respect to BLIP it is an integration platform. Today we are in a software defined world and when I talk about providing a single pane of glass solution it is important for us to have an integration platform where I can bring all EPIs together and do northbound and southbound integrations with the architectures of clients and the cloud providers to spin off workloads, to commission, decommission and provide a seamless consumption experience to clients across multiple hyperscalers and on-premise infrastructure. >> Thank you for that summary. I think you hit on all the big trends. I want to go back to you Rajesh 'cause you said that this is a really unique time. You've been in the business for a very long time. You've seen a lot of other transformations and you've seen a lot of big trends. Why is this one different? What makes where we are today such a unique point in time in this IT industry journey? >> Excellent. I think I would say we are in a period of what is called an enforced innovation. While most of the time transformation in IT has been very, very sequential or continuous I think we are seeing an order of shift in the transformation and this whole situation is forcing everyone to accelerate the pace of innovation and transformation. There are two key priorities for every organization in this time. One, build resilient operations and second employee safety. These two parameters have forced the organization to look at their businesses differently, look at their IT infrastructure differently and created a sort of opportunity you can say which is ripe for Wipro's BoundaryLess Enterprise because there are no boundaries. People are working from home. They're no longer in an office confined or boundary. So that's smart. Coming back we are seeing an accelerated innovation. That means our partnership to deliver customer transformation at scale becomes all the more important. Bringing all the good technologies of Dell on one side and combining it Wipro's size, scale and services help us lead in the marketplace for customer transformation. And what's more, we are adding our Dell financial services solutions as Dell Tech on demand to enable all this to be consumed as a service and with flexible payment options which Wipro helps us translate it to customer offerings. >> That's great. Utpal, I want to go to you and get your perspective on how customers, in terms of this boundaryless, how things have changed since March 15th which at least here in the US, I don't know if in India it was on the same date when everything basically got shut down. So it was this light switch moment. Everybody worked from home, no planning, no thought like ready, set, go to now we're six, seven, eight months into this thing and clearly we're it's a marathon not a sprint and even if we go back to some semblance of what was the old normal the new normal is going to be different and everyone is not going to go back to work full time like they did before. So how, from a customer perspective, from a technology implementation perspective and from an initiative and getting this stuff done how has that changed pre-COVID then oh my goodness, it's the light switch moment and now it's, hey, we're in this for the long term. >> Yeah. I think Rajesh did hit upon that a little bit. This is truly that moment where it was a forced innovation. Some of it was happening anyways and it was bound to happen but I think the COVID kind of accelerated all of it. What has impacted is it all started with, okay, how do we enable work from home? And that is when the whole BoundaryLess infrastructure, the virtual desk solutions and all of that started getting impact. I think after that most companies have realized that this is not a short term fix. It is a longterm it's going to be here for staying so they wanted to have a longterm fix so they wanted to come in with innovation but at the same time from a business perspective they've had impact in business so they wanted very creative business models for them to get set with the technology innovation quicker but they didn't want to do it in a traditional way of paying it all upfront and moving it to that. So that is where the creativity in terms of joint innovation which we did with Dell, in flexible payment options, bringing in some kind of an asset lease model and things like that have gained traction. A lot more conversations are around we want to transform help us find a way to make the transformation sooner with maybe less investment upfront and find a way to fund this from the future savings we'll get so that we can be ready for the future without necessarily impacting the bottom line today. All of that has changed, I would say in summary, has accelerated the adoption and the rate of change but it has also led to all of us thinking some creative business models and new approaches to doing business. >> Right, right. Satish back to you. What are the big conflicts that always exist? There's innovation versus security, right? And enabling innovation and giving people more power, more tools, more data to do things at the same time now your tax surface has increased you don't necessarily have everybody locked down on their home infrastructure and they were forced into this. When people are talking about digital transformation, how do they continue to drive forward and how are you helping them on innovation and enabling innovation at the same time as you talked about keeping the data protected and really thinking about business resiliency and continuity in this to increase the tax surface not only because of mobile, but now with the working from home thing? It's increased exponentially. >> Yeah. So I would just take an example of how Wipro handled this pandemic when it hit us and what solutions we get. So let me just give you a perspective. As we all know the current pandemic has disrupted many industries and we were no exception. Basically COVID has brought to the forefront many crucial factors in terms of business continuity process, the quality of employee experience and the automation connected with the employees. So while we enable our employees to connect, collaborate, and communicate with ease from anywhere from any device in a secure way with a consistent user experience powered by Wipro LiVE Workspace platform which actually takes care of delivering a seamless onboarding of user via the Wipro LiVE Workspace platform and consume all the services the way they used to traditionally consume when they were working from office? So this is something which is the power of Wipro LiVe Workspace platform we have implemented to deliver a seamless employee experience access to the workspaces. That's one but also there are some learnings. When we implemented the solutions on the flip side as businesses we must also acknowledge and be cognizant of the fact that employees are trying hard to juggle between frequent interruptions at home and notifications from various applications we receive both on corporate and personal devices. Basically in a nut shell it is difficult to have the culture of corporate to be working from home. Basically that's another big learning. While all of us are adjusting to this new normal we are in constant touch with our employees and trying to improve the overall employee connect and experience. From a solution perspective let me just give you what we actually did. We have close to 175,000 employees across the globe. Suddenly started working from home post lockdown. What does this mean? The traffic pattern suddenly changed the directions which were traditionally moving on a East to West direction started moving North to South. Basically this means a 100% of the workforce in a corporate started coming from the internet to access the corporate infrastructure and then gain access to the customer network. So basically we had to quickly swing in with our solutions and got our engineering teams to re engineer and tweet the infrastructure and security architecture to this new normal. By leveraging our Wipro BLE and video architectures which is powered by Dell VxRail, NSX we were able to spin off and build capacity on on-prem as well as on cloud in less than 24 hours post one got approvals from the client. Lastly we also deployed a back to work IoT solution which helped our employees to get back to work safely. Basically the solution offers various security parameters. Apart from traditional COVID updates it also helps in scanning the employees' temperatures, employee movement within the office premises, bundled with video analytics and enables secure touch less access to the ODCs for employees who are coming back to work. So we are putting all these solutions together and we pretty much seamlessly were able to navigate from the pandemic situation and get our business back to operations in a matter of days. >> 175,000 People. It's really interesting to think about how that network traffic completely changed from inside the firewalls to everything coming from the outside. It's a lot of people to get working from home right away so congratulations on that. As we come to a close Rajesh, I want to come back to you and talk about again, partnership in the age of this rapid acceleration of technology adoption, new technology move. We talked about the work from home. We've talked about cloud. We haven't talked very much about there's this other big thing that's coming down the pike which is 5G and IoT and kind of this entirely new scale of communication that's machine to machine, not person to person and now these connected devices. The amount of traffic continues to go up into the right at an accelerating rate. Tell us a little bit about the meaningfulness of having a partnership like Wipro that you guys can build solutions around new cutting edge technologies and have that real close connection with the customer or with all the supporting services. >> We'd love to. And maybe first I'll give you a perspective on how our employee base started working from home. Some other statistics that they wanted to show maybe add on towards what Satish said. We transitioned 120,000 employees. Twice the normal to work from home within two weeks and every day we are running something like 20,000 meetings and 16 million zoom minutes per day. That's the kind of traffic IT has seen. >> 16 million zoom minutes per day? >> Zoom minutes per day. >> Wow. >> That's the kind of traffic and our VPN traffic user load just tripled. At software or IT we call Dell digital. It was just a smooth and seamless experience. Now coming back, you said rightly. While we have partnered so far to deliver to the solution which are here today and the customers needs which are here today, what are we going to do for the future needs especially ie 5G IoT? We believe as a corporation that Edge is going to be the next wave of innovation. And next way our customers will benefit. Therefore connectivity to Edge via 5G becomes critical. IoT devices and managing the traffic and contain it there itself rather than flowing it back to data center becomes critical. As an example Wipro and Dell technologies are using our hyper converge solutions along with VMware telco and software for a European telco to provide automation and AI to deliver rapid results for the customer. So these are just early parts of it. We are partnering with Wipro to build solutions around 5G as well as telecom related innovation that'll come into the picture. IoT Satish spoke about a simple example of employee attendance. Imagine this is a need which will only accelerate from every organization, multiply it with the automation and AI that needs to be built into machines and feeding all the data back to drive some intelligence and refine the processes, refine the business outcomes. So I think we are working together on many such things and what's important is in all this, when the universe just explodes to devices and millions of devices, security becomes a paramount feature and we are working with Wipro to build what is called an embedded security into each of the solutions that we are designing. Security cannot be an afterthought or a bolt on it's becoming an integral part of the overall solution as we move towards the Edge. >> Yeah, right. And I think as Satish talked about all the distractions and notifications there're a lot of great opportunities for applied AI too to help people know what to do next. It's hard to be context switching all the time, not only on your work, but also the spouses working from home, the kids are doing homeschooling. It's not an optimal environment at all. Gentlemen thank you for your time. Congratulations on your partnership and hope you have a fantastic Dell Tech World. Sorry we can't be in person but this is not too bad. >> Thank you. >> Jeff >> Thank you >> Thank you Utpal, thank you Satish for your partnership. >> All right. Thank you gentlemen. >> Thank you. >> Alright. Stay with us for continuing coverage of Dell Technologies World 2020. I'm Jeff Frick. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
to you by Dell Technologies. and this is the all virtual version I'm speaking to you It's the power of the virtual, right? He is the Vice President I'm from Dallas, Texas. and again didn't have to and the importance of and products and the depth of product and we all know what the answer is. and the virtual desk and cloud on cloud. and the BoundaryLess Integration Platform What are the things that and the workloads which are You've been in the business and with flexible payment options the new normal is going to be different and the rate of change and continuity in this to and be cognizant of the fact that and kind of this entirely Twice the normal to work and AI that needs to and hope you have a Thank you Utpal, thank you Thank you gentlemen. of Dell Technologies World 2020.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Rajesh Janey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Satish Yadavalli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Satish | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rajesh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wipro | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Satish Yadavali | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Utpal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dallas, Texas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Bangalore, India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dallas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20,000 meetings | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Utpal Bakshi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gurgaon, India | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
March 15th | DATE | 0.99+ |
South Lake | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
five building blocks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
120,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
360 degree | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
first guest | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
less than 24 hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
fourth point | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Dell Technologies World | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Dell Tech | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two weeks | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two key | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.96+ |
Uptal Bakshi | PERSON | 0.95+ |
millions of devices | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Guy Bartram, VMware and Doug Lieberman, Dell Technologies | Dell Technologies World 2020
>> Narrator: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of Dell Technologies World Digital Experience brought to you by Dell Technologies. >> Hi welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with theCUBE coming to you from our Palo Alto studios, with our ongoing coverage of the Dell Technology World 2020, the digital experience, we can't be together this year, but we can still get together this way. And we're excited for our very next segment, really talking about one of the big leverage points that the Dell VMware relationship can result in, so we're excited. Joining us our next guest is Guy Bartram, he is the Director of Product Marketing for Cloud Director, for VMware. Guy great to see you, where are you coming in from? >> Thanks for having me on Jeff. >> Where are you coming in from today? (Guy chuckles) >> So this yeah, this London for me, this is from London. >> Excellent, great to see you. >> In the UK. >> And also joining us, Doug Lieberman, he is the Global Solutions Director for Dell Technology, Doug, great to see you, where are you coming in from today? >> Well, thanks for having me, I'm calling in from just outside of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania in the United States. >> Excellent, love Philly's lived there for a couple of years and man, there's some terrific food in that part of the world, I tell yah. So let's get into--- >> You say--- >> Are you Pat's or Geno's. >> Actually I'll eat either one but I think I prefer Pat. >> Okay buddy, I used to get one of each and eat half and half and piss people off that were the purest, but that's a difference--- >> That's the right way to do it. (Jeff and Guy laughs) >> Right, so let's get into it, you know, before we turned on the cameras, you guys were talking about this exciting announcement that you've been working on for a really long time. So before we get kind of into the depths and the importance, why don't we just go ahead and tell us, what is the big announcement that we're sharing today? Go to you Guy. >> And so VMware and Dell really have worked together and we both have partner programs that are focused on service providers, Cloud Service providers, and systems integrators and strategic outsourcers. And what we've done is work together to build a solution that is really targeted towards them in the cloud arena, so taking our cloud capabilities and solutions and optimizing it for cloud providers and doing that through what we call, leveraging our Dell Technologies Cloud Platform and putting VMware Cloud Director on top of that. >> So that's pretty amazing, and really, to you Guy, what does that enable Cloud Service providers to do that they couldn't do so well before? >> It brings a whole lot of benefits to a Cloud Service provider, I mean, for cloud providers, historically they've had to have infrastructure services that've been, you know, quite heavy for them to build, taken a long time to get the market, and really had a high burn and operational costs and this solution VMware Cloud Director on Dell Technologies Cloud Platform is going to bring them the multitenancy aspects of cloud director and all of the speed and efficiencies in application and infrastructure delivery to enable them to address the common need now around hybrid cloud management and hybrid cloud operations. >> And you talked about before, I'm sorry, go ahead, Doug. >> No, I was saying, you know, I think that the big key piece is that, there're special requirements that cloud providers really need from their infrastructure, from their cloud, that makes it special to their business model, and what this aims to do, is to provide those capabilities in a easily consumable and rapid implementation format so that they can get to revenue faster and they can get to higher level services faster. >> It's funny, you talked about getting to revenue faster, back in the day I worked at Intel and Craig Barrett was famous for TTM. TTM, everyone used to think it was time to market bringing a new product to market, and he said, no, no, no, it's time to money, right, how fast can you get operational, so that you can basically get this thing to start generating revenue, I always think of that when you look at seven 37 sitting at a gate, you know, how do you get it operational? So Doug, what were some of those special challenges that they have in their market and how are you helping them solve them? >> So it's a great question, Jeff, as we work with service providers all over the world, they've given us a consistent message, that the days of the value in their service being, how they build the underlying cloud and how they do that orchestration automation are really behind us, right, they're expecting today, an end to end capability delivered as sort of an appliance for that underlying infrastructure for the cloud components, so that they can focus on the higher level services and the things that provide more value and more margin for them, and so, you know, the as a service offerings that run on top of the underlying cloud. And so what this joint solution does is really provide a validated design so that they can redirect their engineering resources from figuring out how to make that base cloud work in a service provider format, with multitenancy, chargeback, showback, portals, et cetera, and get that up and running faster and not have to worry about how to automate all that themselves, so they can focus their engineering efforts on those higher level services that provide greater value to their bottom line, to be honest, >> Great, that's great, and Guy, I want to go back to you, you know, the Cloud Service providers probably don't get as much of publicity as you know, we hear all the time about the big public Cloud Providers, you know, the big three or four or however you want to count them and we hear a lot about data centers and staff migrating between those two, we don't hear a lot of conversation in kind of the hybrid or the multicloud discussion about the role of the smaller Cloud Service providers. So I wonder if you can share a little bit about how they play in the market, you know why this is a really important segment for everyone's, you know, kind of architecture and ability to deliver applications. >> That's great common, I mean, one of the things we tend to call on our partners internally is the fall of mega cloud, that you know you really haven't heard of, there's 4,000 partners in our partner program and all of them are providing very valuable cloud services. They provide cloud services they've in all areas of cloud, so this could be into Azure, Google, AWS or in their own data centers, and many of them have come from infrastructure rich environments or what we call asset heavy environments and delivering services in these environments. The recent kind of drive to cloud adoption and digital transformation has meant that there's been a growing demand for Cloud Service providers to deliver valuable managed services and professional services to help customer do that digital transformation and really help the customer identify, where their customer's workloads, would be best apt and running. And, you know, cloud providers specialize in delivering these services like Doug was saying, they're looking at that higher value and they brought a lot of skills and capability in those areas. >> That's great, 'cause it's really good to keep in mind they pay a really important role in this whole thing. And Doug I want to go back to you in terms of working together with VMware in the solution space, right, so it's one thing to talk about a relationship between two companies, it's one thing to see Michael Dell and Pat Gelsinger on stage together, it's a whole nother deal to get together and put in the investment in these joint solutions. So I wonder if you could share a little bit more color on not only today's announcement, but what this really means for you guys going forward and more importantly, your customers, and ultimately your customer's customers. >> Absolutely, so Dell and VMware are both committed to really driving the success of our Cloud Provider partners all over the world, and to do that, we recognize that there's an additional level of capabilities that we need to bring together and jointly do that. And so we agreed to work together to go build a series of capabilities that are really targeted at going beyond just the basic HCI market and the basic cloud market and extending that for capabilities that are targeted specifically and built specifically for our service providers. And so this solution that we're announcing today is the first step on a journey, but we both committed to and made investments in, continuing that and adding more and more capabilities as we move forward and really addressing that very specific market. And working with our Cloud Service provider partners to figure out what is the next step, what do they need from us, at the end of the day, we're looking to jointly help them be more successful and accelerate their time to market and their go to market capabilities. >> Right, that's great, and Guy back to you, you actually had some numbers, some IDC numbers that you can share in terms of some of the real measurable benefits of this. >> That's right Jeff, yeah, we have, IDC did a recent analysis for us with about 12 partners interviewed across the globe, and some of the results that came back were pretty astounding actually, this pay-for is available on our VCE product page on vmware.com. But just as kind of summarize, you know, we talk about getting to revenue faster, they found that on average service providers were able to onboard customers, i.e migrate them, into their cloud environment around 72% faster, 57% faster delivery of new services and we all know that, you know, portfolio and construction of services takes a long time, but you get business units to buy in to give it support services, so 57% faster delivery of services is incredible. And then, you know, obviously getting to revenue 32% more revenue from VCD services than without VCD and 51% overall more growth with VCD from things like more efficient operations, which are also marked at like 31%. So, you know, significant advantages to having Cloud Director bringing those economies of scale, bringing that capability to migrate from a customer premise into service providers cloud, and then obviously be able to utilize multiple larger clouds across multiple regions. >> That's great, and Doug, I wonder if you could share, are there some specific applications that are driving this more than others, is there any particular kind of subset of the solutions that you can highlight where you're getting the most demand and where you see kind of the both short term opportunity as well as mid and longterm opportunity? >> A great question, I think it really evolves around a couple of different aspects. So one is from a pure security standpoint and things like data sovereignty, we're seeing an increased demand for the service providers that are our partners, as in the ecosystem of cloud, there will always be a role for the hyperscaler clouds as well as the role of these independent Cloud Service providers that are at the next tier down, both for the data sovereignty issues, things like GDPR, but as well as kind of that personal feel, that personal touch and specialty in applications, some of the specific areas we're seeing are things like business process management capabilities, database as a service, VDI as a service, but even more critically things like cyber recovery and backup as a service we're seeing, especially in the current situation that we're in, really an uptick in the cyber attacks and the ransomware, et cetera, and so solutions such as our cyber recovery are critical in those capabilities and those higher level services tied into and integrated with an overall service provider framework are key. And so in the area that we're really seeing uptake are really the business critical mission functions that enterprises are looking to run in a trusted partner's data center, and that's what we're seeing, where we're a lot of traction for this Dell Technologies Cloud Platform, combining VCD and VCF together to give you all those features and enterprise reliability. >> Right, and I didn't ask you Guy kind of the partnership question about having the opportunity to put your capability, you know, on the Dell Cloud Platform, opens up a whole new set of field resources, a whole new set of technical resources, you know, a whole different resources, not that VMware's short on resources by any stretch of the imagination, but it's certainly an additive, you know, kind of one plus one makes three opportunity. >> Yeah, I mean, it's great to be doing this and we've actually already been doing this on a couple of other initiatives, so from my perspective, I, you know, I manage Cloud Director Portfolio and we've already integrated Dell, Data Domain Dell, Avamar backup solutions, Data Protection Suite, into VCD as self service and we've already put in quite a bit of work, working together with Dell on that, as we go forward we're going to be putting more work into supporting VCD on the Dell Technologies Cloud Platform and integrating more services from Dell and from other vendors into the solution as well. So all we want to really provide is the capability for service provider to have the easy to consume hardware model, easy to consume subscription software model, with our program, and then the extensibility of services over and above just the infrastructure layer. So looking at things like object storage, and as Doug said, data protection, migration services, container cluster services, there's a myriad of services that VCD provides today out the box, and then there's the a whole extensibility framework, which we use when we work with partners, like we've done with Dell to deliver things like data protection. >> Yeah, I want to go back to you Doug, in terms of kind of a higher level, this whole transition to as a service, you've been in the business for a long time, you've been in the solutions a long time, but, you know, switching everything to as a service, as often as we can, and as frequently as we can, and as broadly across portfolio is really a terrific response to what the customers now, are looking for. So I'm wondering if you share some color on, you know, this philosophy of trying to get to, as a service, as much as you can, across the broadest solution set as you can. >> Yeah and if you look over the last decade, and decade and a half, there has been this increasing trend to moving to as a service offerings and the public clouds really drove a large part of that, than in tier two service providers around the globe. The key piece especially in the current business model, then going forward is how do you optimize, your CapEx versus OPEX and how do you really leverage the IT infrastructure to the maximum extent possible, based upon current business conditions, and that means the ability to grow and train and the ability to only consume what you need. In the past, when we had traditional data centers, you basically built for the worst case, and so the worst case was you had, an accounting run that happened at the end of the month that required a lot of processing power, then you built to that and that's what you use, and for the rest of the month, it really mostly idle. The cloud model really gives you the ability to A, improve their, or only use what you need and consume when you want to use it, but also adds in really shifting the responsibility for the management and the operations into someone, people who are experts in that area, so that again, you as a business can focus on your mission critical aspects of what you do whether that's developing a drug, building cars, making pizza, whatever it is, really as a service model enables your business to drive their core competency and not have to worry about the IT infrastructure that other people can do more efficiently and with better value than you could do it internally. And all that drive to that as a service model with the additional financial models that really aligned to the business paradigm that really companies are looking for. >> As you're saying that I'm thinking, wow, remember those days when our worst case scenario, was running a big batch load at the end of the month or the end of the quarter, and that would be re-missed, right, we are 2020, we're spread out all over the country and the world on both sides of the Atlantics. If I didn't say something about, you know, kind of the COVID impacts in terms of this accelerate, 'cause we hear it all the time in social media, right, who's driving your digital transformation, is it the CEO, the CIO, of COVID, and we've moved from this kind of light switch moment and then merged to, hey, this is an ongoing thing, and you know, kind of the new normal, is the new normal. And it's really shifted, a lot of people are talking about, you know, kind of shifts in the cloud infrastructure, the direction of the traffic, right, from going now from East to West and it's North to South, 'cause it's going to everybody's home. I wonder, I'll go back to you Guy, in terms of, the response that you've heard from some of your customers, in a response to, you know, kind of A, let's put a stop gap in early March that was interesting, and critical, and done, but now, kind of looking forward as to, you know, kind of a redistribution of workloads and architecture and users and I think Doug talked about security. How are you seeing any kind of ongoing effects and how is this impacting, you know, kind of you go to market and what you guys are bringing to market. >> Yeah, we're definitely seeing a lot of change in the way that service providers are trying to address this now. At the start of COVID, it was really a struggle, I think, for everyone to get the resources that they required to keep customers up from running, a lot of people started re-examining their disaster recovery contingency planning, and realizing that actually, what has happened in the last couple of years is, you know, workloads have exploded, a lot of patient workloads have completely gone through the roof and container workloads have grown drastically, and what's happened is the contingency plans behind all this stuff haven't changed and they just simply can't keep up the dynamic nature of the way we're doing business. Quite simply put technology is outpacing our weight, our ability to deal with that, so, you know, service providers need to provide a platform solution that enables them to be able to orchestrate at scale and enables them to orchestrate securely at scale, and really that means they've got to move away from this is hardware analog and move into virtual resourcing, cloud resource pooling elasticity, and particularly hypothesy. I know VMware we talk a lot about hybrid solutions and multicloud, but it's a reality when you look at where customers are today in their cloud journey, most of them have a footprint in their premise, have a footprint in a cloud provider premise and have multiple footprints in public cloud environments, so they need to have that consistent security model across that, they need to have data contingency and backup solutions, and someone needs to be in that to manage that, and that's where the service providers come in. They need to move away from the kind of infrastructure day to day operations that they were doing before and scale it out to now application protection and application development environments. >> Right, so Doug, I'm going to give you the last word as we wrap up this segment, you know, it's easy for us and pundits and people to write about multicloud and hybrid cloud and all these concepts, you guys actually have to make it work on the ground with real customers and real workloads. So I wonder if you could just kind of, you know, share your perspective, you've been working on this Dell Cloud Platform, you know, kind of how you see this evolving over time, and again, kind of what gets you up in the morning as you look forward as to what this journey is going to be over the next six months, one year, two year, three years down the road. >> Brought a lot of functionality capabilities to the world, right, the ability to consume things as you need them, the ability to really rely on a combined set of clouds and multicloud, and if you look at any enterprise that by any estimate, any company of any size, it's probably got 12, 15 clouds that contain their multicloud between using hyperscalers, tier two service providers, as well as cloud based services like Salesforce.com or Office 365, and you combine all those together and what that provides is a lot of flexibility, a lot of functionality, but also an extreme amount of complexity. And that complexity is really where Dell Technologies Cloud and Dell Technologies Cloud Platform is looking to help and to reduce that complexity, 'cause ultimately a successful enterprise is going to leverage the best from multiple clouds across multiple different implementations in order to provide the end to end IT experience that they need for both their external facing and internal IT operations. And with Dell Technologies Cloud Platform and working with our service providers, what we aim to do is to simplify the implementation of those multiple clouds and how they work together and make it as seamless as possible to shift workloads where they need to be, see your entire virtual enterprise IT environment, no matter where it's running, and to really optimize on your business to understand how you're using cloud, where you're using cloud, and how those clouds work together. And so the integration of all the different features with VMware and Dell bring together that end to end capability to significantly simplify the multicloud experience, and then ultimately our service provider partners, can help you on that journey to provide that management and orchestration across those different clouds and the data transformation, the digital transformation necessary in order to drive success. >> That's great, well, thank you Doug, for putting a nice big bow on it, and congratulations to you both for getting this release out, I know there's a lot of hard work and effort behind it, so it's always kind of good to finally get to expose it to the real world, so thanks for taking a few minutes with us. >> Great, thank you for having us. >> Absolutely. >> Yeah thanks Jeff, thank you. >> All right, he's Guy, he's Doug, I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE's continuous coverage of Dell Technologies World 2020, the digital experience. Thanks for watching, we'll see you next time. (soft upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Dell Technologies. that the Dell VMware So this yeah, this London for me, in the United States. in that part of the world, I tell yah. one but I think I prefer Pat. (Jeff and Guy laughs) Go to you Guy. and doing that through what we call, and all of the speed and efficiencies And you talked about before, and they can get to higher and how are you helping them solve them? and the things that provide more value and ability to deliver applications. and really help the customer identify, and put in the investment and to do that, we recognize and Guy back to you, and we all know that, you know, and the ransomware, et cetera, Right, and I didn't ask you Guy so from my perspective, I, you know, and as broadly across portfolio and so the worst case was you had, and you know, kind of the new and enables them to to give you the last word and to really optimize on your business and congratulations to you both 2020, the digital experience.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Doug | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Doug Lieberman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Guy Bartram | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
57% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
4,000 partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
31% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
32% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
51% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
early March | DATE | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Guy | PERSON | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Craig Barrett | PERSON | 0.98+ |
VMware Cloud Director | TITLE | 0.98+ |
IDC | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.97+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Dell Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
Geno | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one year | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
around 72% | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
last decade | DATE | 0.94+ |
about 12 partners | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
COVID | OTHER | 0.93+ |
Dell VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Office 365 | TITLE | 0.93+ |
tier two | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Dipak Prasad, Dell Technologies Cloud | Dell Technologies World 2020
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of Dell Technologies. World digital experience brought to you by Dell Technologies. Hey, Welcome back, everybody. Jeffrey here with the Cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of Dell Technology. World 2020. The digital experience, Uh, not in person like nothing this year, 2020. But the digital experience allows to do a lot of things that you couldn't do in person. And we're excited to have our next guest. He is Deepak Prasad, the director of product management for Dell Technologies. Cloud deep. Uh, great to see you. >>Hello, Jeff. Nice to meet you as well. >>You too. So let's let's back up, like, 10,000 square feet, cause you know, Cloud came in with a big giant rage. I guess it's been a while now with AWS and Public Cloud. And people are putting their depth tests on there. And, you know, we've seen this explosion of public cloud, and then we have hybrid cloud and multi cloud. And then, you know, basically people figured out that not everything can go to a public cloud. A lot of stuff. Shouldn't some stuffs gonna stay in data centers? for all different reasons, >>but >>basically it's horses for courses. So we're a little ways into this. How are you guys, Adele, really thinking about Cloud and helping your customers think about what cloud is beyond, you know, kind of the hype. >>Well, that's a great question, Jeff. At Dell, we think of Cloud really as an operating model and as an operating experience rather than a destination. So it's interesting that you bring up Public Cloud and Private Cloud, but we take a step back and think of what does that experience really represent? So if you think off, uh, you know what defines that cloud operating model? It's, ah, democratization of technology. Access off resource is through a p. I s through self service portals ability to pay as you go in a very simplified commerce experience and the agility of cloud. You know, the promise off instant availability of infinite scalability. Now, if if you look at you know the landscape around this until now, that has only been delivered in a consistent way by public cloud vendors, which leads people to believe that really cloud is the destination, not an operating model. But we think that we are capable of bringing those experiences those tenets off the cloud operating model to the on premises experience and really taking location out of the conversation. So this really allows our customers to focus mawr on their workloads than visions. They want to drive, and then they can fit there, uh, requirements their application requirements to the location where those resource is our regardless of having toe worry about it. This is public or private. They will get the same operating experience. They will get the same scalability, the same simplified commerce, the same access Thio resource is >>right. Well, let's talk about some of some of those things because, as you said, there's a lot of behaviors that are involved in cloud and cloud operating. You know, one of the behaviors that I think gave the public cloud an early leg up was just simply provisioning, right? Simply, if somebody needs some capacity, they need some horsepower to get interesting. It would be tested in the early days. No, they didn't have to provision. They didn't have to put in an order with I t and wait for so long to get a box assigned to them or purchased or whatever, right? They just swipe the credit card and went, How have you kind of help People have that kind of ease of use ease of, uh, he's of spin up piece of creation on what the right verb is because I think that's a really core piece of what enabled early cloud adoption. >>No, absolutely, you're spot on. And that was a big part of it that if somebody needed resource is instead of waiting for weeks and months, they could go on and and sign up for those resource and get almost instantaneous access. And we believe that what we're doing in this area is really transforming the business. Today. We can deliver resource is to customers in their data center in 14 days and really are aggressively looking to cut that down further. So what this really means is not just shipping Resource is in 14 days, but actually delivering a cloud experience in the customer's data center or of cola location, whatever, you know, location of their choice in 14 days and making that available to the customers, not just through the traditional procurement process. But we're actually very proud to announce the cloud Council, the Dell Technologies Cloud Council, through which customers can, in a self service way, order those ordered those resource is and have it show up and be operational in their environment in 14 days. So we're really bringing that speed of cloud to the on premise experience, >>right? So how how does it actually work? Do you pre? Do you pre ship some amount of capacity beyond what you believe is currently needed just to kind of forward que you will, if you will capacity. How does it work from from both the implementation strategy in terms of the actual compute and storage capacity, as well as on kind of the purchasing peace? Because those air to kind of very >>different work flows? No, that's a That's a great question. So for us, our strength are really in supply chain management that allows us to build capabilities across the world in areas from where we can ship the customers almost on the on demand basis. So as soon as we get in order that the customer needs a probably probably cloud deployment in a certain location, were able to mobilize those resource is from those locations and have it instance she hated in customers environ. So it's really built a strength off over the years off optimizing supply chain, if you will, and just bring taking that to the next level off. >>Okay, so we don't, >>uh environment we said. Yeah, >>no problem. I was gonna say the another great characteristics of cloud right is is spinning up, which we hear about all the time versus spinning down and write. The easiest example is always use. If you're running, you know, some promotion. If your pizza hut you're running a promotion for the Super Bowl, obviously, right? Your demand for that thing is gonna be huge. You want to spin up to be able to take advantage of all the people cash in their coupon, and then when the Super Bowls over, >>you >>want to spend those resource is down because you're not going to necessarily need that capacity. How do you guys accomplish that type of flexibility in your solution? >>So in our subscription model, we have different ways to address customer environment. So we allow customers to start very small and then and then grow the subscription as the requirements growth and the key thing of our subscription, which is really unique, is the ability to quote Terminate. So, for example, if if a customer started off on the three year subscription with the, uh resource is for, say, 100 virtual machines and somewhere along the way they needed to add resource is for 50 more virtual machines, so they will pay for the 150 virtual machines. But that extra 50 virtual machines does not create an orphan or a child subscription. At the end of three years, everything terminates together, so it really gives them flexibility with, you know, ability to start small and not have to worry about vendor lock in. And now we started off with sort of a reserved instance type off subscription model. But we're definitely bringing usage based models as well, which allows more, even more flexibility with respect to speeding up and speeding down. Right. >>And then what are some of the real specific reasons that people go for this type of solution versus a public cloud where some of the rial inherent advantages of doing this within my own infrastructure, my own data center, my own, you know, kind of virtual four walls, if you will. >>Yeah, you know, we strongly believe that the decision should really be guided by workload requirements. There's certain workloads that work really well in on premises environment. For example, you could take virtual desktop environments V. D. I. That works really well from a performance standpoint in In on premise, environment versus a public cloud environment. Similarly, there are other workloads were not public cloud deniers that that are best suited for public cloud. But it's really it should be something that's that comes from understanding your application. Understanding the leighton see requirements, understanding the data requirements for those applications. You know, what are your egress? Uh, issues. Or, you know, uh, the profile off the workload that you're trying to implement That should really be the driving force in where the workload this place >>and then, uh, tell us a little bit about the partnership with VM Ware because that's a huge asset that you have, you know, now you know, basically side by side and you can leverage the technology as well as a lot of the assets that are envy. And where how does that change? The way you guys have taken the Dell Cloud platform to market >>it really is a a differentiating factor for us. From a technology standpoint, it allows us to bring the best of both worlds best off off the hardware infrastructure as well as the best off the cloud. Stack the cloud software infrastructure together in one cohesive and and well developed package. So, uh, the Dell Technologies Cloud Platform from a technology standpoint is implemented with our VX rail appliances, which is a hyper converge infrastructure as well as VM ware clad foundation from a software standpoint. Now the code developed and jointly engineered capabilities allow for unique, unique feature off. Remember Cloud Foundation, where it can do lifecycle management off the entire stack, both the hardware and the software from a single interface. So it understands Vieques rails and understands the different form where levels and the X, where manager software versions etcetera. And then it would automatically select what is the best and well tested and supported software bundle that could be deployed without causing, you know, typical issues with version mismatches and trying to chase down different hardware compatibility, matrices, etcetera. All of those are eliminated, so it's a integrated lifecycle management experience. That's great. E. I'm sorry I have >>a little bit, a little bit of a lot of here, so I I apologize. >>I >>was just gonna say you've been at this for a while. Your product, you know, product management. So you're really thinking about speeds and feeds and you're thinking about roadmap and futures? I wonder if you can share your perspective on this evolution from kind of this race of to pure public cloud to this. This big discussion I think we had packed Elson. You're talking about a hybrid cloud back at being where 2013. So then, you know kind of this hybrid cloud and multi cloud and really kind of this maturation of this space as we as we've progressed for Ah, while now probably 10 years. >>Yeah. Yeah. And, uh, majority of our customers live in a multi cloud world. They have resource is that they consumed from one or more multi hyper sorry, uh, public cloud vendors and they have one or more on premise vendors as well, For their resource is and managing that complex environment across multiple providers with different skill set different tools, different sls. While it sounds really interesting to, you know, have workload drive your your deployment and place the workloads where they're best suited. It does prevent. It does present a challenge off managing a complex and and getting even more complex by the day, multi cloud environment. And that's where we think we have an advantage. Uh, based on some of the work that we're doing with the Dell Technologies Cloud console to bring a true multi cloud experience to our customers. Not one of the benefits of not being a, you know, a public cloud provider is that we are agnostic toe. All public cloud providers were fully accepting that certain workloads need to live in those environments. And through our cloud council, we will make it easy for customers to manage not only their on premises, assets and on premises. Cloud resource is, but also cloud resource is that reside in multiple public cloud vendors? >>That's good. Yeah, because it helps, right, because they've got stuff everywhere. It's like that, you know, there is no del technology, right? There's a lot of there's a lot of people that work there. There's a lot of project. There's a lot of, you know, kind of pieces to that puzzle. I wonder too. If you could share your perspective on kind of application modernization, right, That's always another big, you know, kind of topic. You should You should you take those old legacy APS. And could you should you try to rebuild them in, um, or cloud native way using containers and and all this flexibility and deploy them or, you know, which one. Should you just leave alone right there, running fine. They've been running fine for a while. They've got some basic core functionality that may be do or don't need toe to kind of modernize if you will. And maybe those resources should be spent on building in a new applications and new kind of areas of competitive differentiation. When you're working with their clients, how do you tell them to think about at modernization? >>Yeah, we looked at it from a business requirement standpoint. Off how what end goals. A customer trying to achieve through that application. And in some cases, you know, on you cover the spectrum, right there. Some cases modernization just means swapping out the hardware and putting it, putting that application on a more modern, more powerful hardware. At the other end, it z you know, going toe assassin model off, you know, everything available through through a cloud application. And in between those two extremities, there's, you know, virtualization that is re factoring this continual ization and micro services based implementation. But it comes down to understanding why that application is meant to deliver for who and what business requirements and business objectives that fulfills. That's how we use as a guiding principle on how to position application modernization to customers. >>All right, that's super helpful, because I'm sure that's a big topic. And, you know, there's probably certain APS that you just should not. You just shouldn't touch. You should probably just even Malone. They're running just fine. Let them do their thing. All >>right, fine. I'm sorry. No. Is this interesting? I was a conversation with the customer just earlier today where they have a portion off their infrastructure of some applications that they absolutely wanted to leave alone and and just change out the underlying hardware. But there are other applications where they really want to adopt, continue ization and re factor those out, rewrite those applications so that they can have more scalability and more flexibility around that. So it really is is determined by the needs. Yeah. >>Um so last question, del Tech world this year was a digital experience, like all the other shows that we've seen here in 2020 just But it's a huge event, right? A big, big show, and we're excited to be back to cover it again. But I'm curious if there's some special announcements within such a big show. Sometimes things get lost a little bit here in there, but any special announcements You want to make sure that get highlighted that people may have missed within this kind of see if content over the last several days >>22 major things that that I'm very excited to share with you One is Dell Technologies Cloud platform. We actually discussing and talking about Dell Technologies cloud platform in the concept off instant capacity blocks. So in the past, we talked about it with respect to notes. Uh, you know, adult technology cloud platform. You can have, you know, so many notes in it to power your your on premises. Cloud resource is but really have changed the conversation and look into how cloud customers air consuming those resource is and we really want to drive focus to that and introduced the concept of instance Capacity blocks instances are think of it as a workload profile, you know, CPU and memory put together and then, uh, in different combinations in a pre defined way to address different workload needs. So this really changes the conversation for our customers that they don't have to worry about designing or or speaking out the hardware platforms, but really understand how many resource is they need, how many, how much you know, processing power, how much memory, how much stories they need and they define their requirements was in those terms, and we will deliver those instance capacity blocks to them in their data centers. So behind the scenes is built by best in class. Uh, you know, hardware from Vieques rails and best in class software from being where, but it's really delivered in terms off instant capacity blocks. The second interesting thing that I wanna share with you and I profession a few times is Dell Technologies Cloud console. We're building this single pane of glass to manage our customers entire journey from on premises to multi cloud hybrid cloud with consistency off. How you can discover services how you can order services and how you can grow your the manager footprint. So those are a couple things from adult technology standpoint that we're really excited to share with people. >>Well, congratulations. I know you've been busting your tail for for quite a while on these types of projects, and it's nice to be able to finally release him out to the world. >>Well, it's just my pleasure. Alright. Thank you very much. >>Well, thank you for stopping by again. Congratulations. And will continue the ongoing coverage of Dell Technology World 2020. The digital experience. I'm Jeff Frick. He's to Park Prasad. You're watching the Cube. See you next time. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
But the digital experience allows to do a lot of things that you couldn't do in person. So let's let's back up, like, 10,000 square feet, cause you know, you know, kind of the hype. I s through self service portals ability to pay as you go in a Well, let's talk about some of some of those things because, as you said, there's a lot of behaviors that are involved in cloud whatever, you know, location of their choice in 14 days and making that of capacity beyond what you believe is currently needed just to kind of forward So it's really built a strength off over the years off optimizing uh environment we said. Your demand for that thing is gonna be huge. How do you guys accomplish that you know, ability to start small and not have to worry about vendor lock in. my own data center, my own, you know, kind of virtual four walls, if you will. Yeah, you know, we strongly believe that the decision should really be guided The way you guys have taken the Dell Cloud platform to market software bundle that could be deployed without causing, you know, typical issues with version mismatches So then, you know kind of this hybrid cloud and multi cloud and really kind of this maturation of not being a, you know, a public cloud provider is that we are There's a lot of, you know, you know, on you cover the spectrum, right there. And, you know, there's probably certain APS that by the needs. like all the other shows that we've seen here in 2020 just But it's a huge event, You can have, you know, so many notes in it to power your your on premises. and it's nice to be able to finally release him out to the world. Thank you very much. Well, thank you for stopping by again.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Deepak Prasad | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dipak Prasad | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
three year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Adele | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 virtual machines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10,000 square feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Super Bowls | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Super Bowl | EVENT | 0.99+ |
150 virtual machines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies Cloud Council | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 virtual machines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell Technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
14 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
14 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Park Prasad | PERSON | 0.98+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two extremities | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
del technology | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
single interface | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both worlds | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Dell Technologies Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Public Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
cloud Council | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
50 more virtual machines | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
this year | DATE | 0.92+ |
VM Ware | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
22 major things | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Vieques | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
this year | DATE | 0.9+ |
earlier today | DATE | 0.9+ |
Malone | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
single pane | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Elson | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
APS | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
egress | ORGANIZATION | 0.74+ |
Technology World 2020 | EVENT | 0.69+ |
Cloud Platform | TITLE | 0.67+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
couple things | QUANTITY | 0.64+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.62+ |
Technologies | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.61+ |
Thio | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
Public Cloud | TITLE | 0.56+ |
Private | TITLE | 0.52+ |
days | DATE | 0.52+ |
last | DATE | 0.5+ |
Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.44+ |
World | EVENT | 0.4+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.39+ |
Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.39+ |
Harnessing the Power of Sound for Nature – Soundscape Ecological Research | Exascale Day 2020
>> From around the globe, it's theCUBE, with digital coverage of Exascale Day. Made possible by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. >> Hey, welcome back everybody Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We are celebrating Exascale Day. 10, 18, I think it's the second year of celebrating Exascale Day, and we're really excited to have our next guest and talk about kind of what this type of compute scale enables, and really look a little bit further down the road at some big issues, big problems and big opportunities that this is going to open up. And I'm really excited to get in this conversation with our next guest. He is Bryan Pijanowski the Professor of Landscape and Soundscape Ecology at Purdue University. Bryan, great to meet you. >> Great to be here. >> So, in getting ready for this conversation, I just watched your TED Talk, and I just loved one of the quotes. I actually got one of quote from it that's basically saying you are exploring the world through sound. I just would love to get a little deeper perspective on that, because that's such a unique way to think about things and you really dig into it and explain why this is such an important way to enjoy the world, to absorb the world and think about the world. >> Yeah, that's right Jeff. So the way I see it, sound is kind of like a universal variable. It exists all around us. And you can't even find a place on earth where there's no sound, where it's completely silent. Sound is a signal of something that's happening. And we can use that information in ways to allow us to understand the earth. Just thinking about all the different kinds of sounds that exist around us on a daily basis. I hear the birds, I hear the insects, but there's just a lot more than that. It's mammals and some cases, a lot of reptiles. And then when you begin thinking outside the biological system, you begin to hear rain, wind, thunder. And then there's the sounds that we make, sounds of traffic, the sounds of church bells. All of this is information, some of it's symbolic, some of it's telling me something about change. As an ecologist that's what I'm interested in, how is the earth changing? >> That's great and then you guys set up at Purdue, the Purdue Center for Global Soundscapes. Tell us a little bit about the mission and some of the work that you guys do. >> Well, our mission is really to use sound as a lens to study the earth, but to capture it in ways that are meaningful and to bring that back to the public to tell them a story about how the earth kind of exists. There's an incredible awe of nature that we all experience when we go out and listen into to the wild spaces of the earth. I've gone to the Eastern Steppes of Mongolian, I've climbed towers in the Paleotropics of Borneo and listened at night. And ask the question, how are these sounds different? And what is a grassland really supposed to sound like, without humans around? So we use that information and bring it back and analyze it as a means to understand how the earth is changing and really what the biological community is all about, and how things like climate change are altering our spaces, our wild spaces. I'm also interested in the role that people play and producing sound and also using sound. So getting back to Mongolia, we have a new NSF funded project where we're going to be studying herders and the ways in which they use sonic practices. They use a lot of sounds as information sources about how the environment is changing, but also how they relate back to place and to heritage a special sounds that resonate, the sounds of a river, for example, are the resonance patterns that they tune their throat to that pay homage to their parents that were born at the side of that river. There's these special connections that people have with place through sound. And so that's another thing that we're trying to do. In really simple terms, I want to go out and, what I call it sounds rather simple, record the earth-- >> Right. >> What does that mean? I want to go to every major biome and conduct a research study there. I want to know what does a grassland sound like? What is a coral reef sound like? A kelp forest and the oceans, a desert, and then capture that as baseline and use that information-- >> Yeah. >> For scientific purposes >> Now, there's so much to unpack there Bryan. First off is just kind of the foundational role that sound plays in our lives that you've outlined in great detail and you talked about it's the first sense that's really activated as we get consciousness, even before we're born right? We hear the sounds of our mother's heartbeat and her voice. And even the last sense that goes at the end a lot of times, in this really intimate relationship, as you just said, that the sounds represent in terms of our history. We don't have to look any further than a favorite song that can instantly transport you, almost like a time machine to a particular place in time. Very, very cool. Now, it's really interesting that what you're doing now is taking advantage of new technology and just kind of a new angle to capture sound in a way that we haven't done before. I think you said you have sound listening devices oftentimes in a single location for a year. You're not only capturing sound, the right sound is changes in air pressure, so that you're getting changes in air pressure, you're getting vibration, which is kind of a whole different level of data. And then to be able to collect that for a whole year and then start to try to figure out a baseline which is pretty simple to understand, but you're talking about this chorus. I love your phrase, a chorus, because that sound is made up of a bunch of individual inputs. And now trying to kind of go under the covers to figure out what is that baseline actually composed of. And you talk about a bunch of really interesting particular animals and species that combine to create this chorus that now you know is a baseline. How did you use to do that before? I think it's funny one of your research papers, you reach out to the great bird followers and bird listeners, 'cause as you said, that's the easiest way or the most prolific way for people to identify birds. So please help us in a crowdsource way try to identify all the pieces that make this beautiful chorus, that is the soundscape for a particular area. >> Right, yeah, that's right. It really does take a team of scientists and engineers and even folks in the social sciences and the humanities to really begin to put all of these pieces together. Experts in many fields are extremely valuable. They've got great ears because that's the tools that they use to go out and identify birds or insects or amphibians. What we don't have are generalists that go out and can tell you what everything sounds like. And I'll tell you that will probably never ever happen. That's just way too much, we have millions of species that exist on this planet. And we just don't have a specific catalog of what everything sounds like, it's just not possible or doable. So I need to go out and discover and bring those discoveries back that help us to understand nature and understand how the earth is changing. I can't wait for us to eventually develop that catalog. So we're trying to develop techniques and tools and approaches that allow us to develop this electronic catalog. Like you're saying this chorus, and it doesn't necessarily have to be a species specific chorus, it can be a chorus of all these different kind of sounds that we think relate back to this kind of animal or that kind of animal based upon the animals instrument-- >> Right, great. >> And this is the sound. >> Now again, you know, keep it to the exascale theme, right? You're collecting a lot of data and you mentioned in one of the pieces I've dug up, that your longest study in a single location is 17 years. You've got over 4 million recordings. And I think you said over 230 years if you wanted to listen to them all back to back. I mean, this is a huge, a big data problem in terms of the massive amount of data that you have and need to run through an analysis. >> Yeah, that's right. We're collecting 48,000 data points per second. So that's 48 kilohertz. And then so you multiply everything and then you have a sense of how many data points you actually have to put them all together. When you're listening to a sound file over 10 minutes, you have hundreds of sounds that exist in them. Oftentimes you just don't know what they are, but you can more or less put some kind of measure on all of them and then begin to summarize them over space and time and try to understand it from a perspective of really science. >> Right, right. And then I just love to get your take as you progress down this kind of identification road, we're all very familiar with copyright infringement hits on YouTube or social media or whatever, when it picks up on some sound and the technology is actually really sophisticated to pick up some of those sound signatures. But to your point, it's a lot easier to compare against the known and to search for that known. Then when you've got this kind of undefined chorus that said we do know that there can be great analysis done that we've seen AI and ML applied, especially in the surveillance side on the video-- >> Right. >> With video that it can actually do a lot of computation and a lot of extracting signal from the noise, if you will. As you look down the road on the compute side for the algorithms that you guys are trying to build with the human input of people that know what you're listening to, what kind of opportunities do you see and where are we on that journey where you can get more leverage out of some of these technology tools? >> Well, I think what we're doing right now is developing the methodological needs, kind of describe what it is we need to move into that new space, which is going to require these computational, that computational infrastructure. So, for example, we have a study right now where we're trying to identify certain kinds of mosquitoes (chuckling) a vector-borne mosquitoes, and our estimates is that we need about maybe 900 to 1200 specific recordings per species to be able to put it into something like a convolutional neural network to be able to extract out the information, and look at the patterns and data, to be able to say indeed this is the species that we're interested in. So what we're going to need and in the future here is really a lot of information that allow us to kind of train these neural networks and help us identify what's in the sound files. As you can imagine the computational infrastructure needed to do that for data storage and CPU, GPU is going to be truly amazing. >> Right, right. So I want to get your take on another topic. And again the basis of your research is really all bound around the biodiversity crisis right? That's from the kind of-- >> Yeah. >> The thing that's started it and now you're using sound as a way to measure baseline and talk about loss of species, reduced abundancies and rampant expansion of invasive species as part of your report. But I'd love to get your take on cities. And how do you think cities fit the future? Clearly, it's an efficient way to get a lot of people together. There's a huge migration of people-- >> Right. >> To cities, but one of your themes in your Ted Talk is reconnecting with nature-- >> Yeah. >> Because we're in cities, but there's this paradox right? Because you don't want people living in nature can be a little bit disruptive. So is it better to kind of get them all in a tip of a peninsula in San Francisco or-- >> Yeah. >> But then do they lose that connection that's so important. >> Yeah. >> I just love to get your take on cities and the impacts that they're have on your core research. >> Yeah, I mean, it truly is a paradox as you just described it. We're living in a concrete jungle surrounded by not a lot of nature, really, honestly, occasional bird species that tend to be fairly limited, selected for limited environments. So many people just don't get out into the wild. But visiting national parks certainly is one of those kinds of experience that people oftentimes have. But I'll just say that it's getting out there and truly listening and feeling this emotional feeling, psychological feeling that wraps around you, it's a solitude. It's just you and nature and there's just no one around. >> Right. >> And that's when it really truly sinks in, that you're a part of this place, this marvelous place called earth. And so there are very few people that have had that experience. And so as I've gone to some of these places, I say to myself I need to bring this back. I need to tell the story, tell the story of the awe of nature, because it truly is an amazing place. Even if you just close your eyes and listen. >> Right, right. >> And it, the dawn chorus in the morning in every place tells me so much about that place. It tells me about all the animals that exist there. The nighttime tells me so much too. As a scientist that's spent most of his career kind of going out and working during the day, there's so much happening at night. Matter of fact-- >> Right. >> There's more sounds at night than there were during the day. So there is a need for us to experience nature and we don't do that. And we're not aware of these crises that are happening all over the planet. I do go to places and I listen, and I can tell you I'm listening for things that I think should be there. You can listen and you can hear the gaps, the gaps and that in that chorus, and you think what should be there-- >> Right. >> And then why isn't it there? And that's where I really want to be able to dig deep into my sound files and start to explore that more fully. >> It's great, it's great, I mean, I just love the whole concept of, and you identified it in the moment you're in the tent, the thunderstorm came by, it's really just kind of changing your lens. It's really twisting your lens, changing your focus, because that sound is there, right? It's been there all along, it's just, do you tune it in or do you tune it out? Do you pay attention? Do not pay attention is an active process or a passive process and like-- >> Right. >> I love that perspective. And I want to shift gears a little bit, 'cause another big environmental thing, and you mentioned it quite frequently is feeding the world's growing population and feeding it-- >> Yeah. >> In an efficient way. And anytime you see kind of factory farming applied to a lot of things you wonder is it sustainable, and then all the issues that come from kind of single output production whether that's pigs or coffee or whatever and the susceptibility to disease and this and that. So I wonder if you could share your thoughts on, based on your research, what needs to change to successfully and without too much destruction feed this ever increasing population? >> Yeah, I mean, that's one of the grand challenges. I mean, society is facing so many at the moment. In the next 20 years or so, 30 years, we're going to add another 2 billion people to the planet, and how do we feed all of them? How do we feed them well and equitably across the globe? I don't know how to do that. But I'll tell you that our crops and the ecosystem that supports the food production needs the animals and the trees and the microbes for the ecosystem to function. We have many of our crops that are pollinated by birds and insects and other animals, seeds need to be dispersed. And so we need the rest of life to exist and thrive for us to thrive too. It's not an either, it's not them or us, it has to be all of us together on this planet working together. We have to find solutions. And again, it's me going out to some of these places and bringing it back and saying, you have to listen, you have to listen to these places-- >> Right. >> They're truly a marvelous. >> So I know most of your listening devices are in remote areas and not necessarily in urban areas, but I'm curious, do you have any in urban areas? And if so, how has that signature changed since COVID? I just got to ask, (Bryan chuckling) because we went to this-- >> Yeah. >> Light switch moment in the middle of March, human activity slowed down-- >> Yeah. >> In a way that no one could have forecast ever on a single event, globally which is just fascinating. And you think of the amount of airplanes that were not flying and trains that we're not moving and people not moving. Did you have any any data or have you been able to collect data or see data as the impact of that? Not only directly in wherever the sensors are, but a kind of a second order impact because of the lack of pollution and the other kind of human activity that just went down. I mean, certainly a lot of memes (Bryan chuckling) on social media of all the animals-- >> Yeah. >> Come back into the city. But I'm just curious if you have any data in the observation? >> Yeah, we're part of actually a global study, there's couple of hundred of us that are contributing our data to what we call the Silent Cities project. It's being coordinated out of Europe right now. So we placed our sensors out in different areas, actually around West Lafayette area here in Indiana, near road crossings and that sort of thing to be able to kind of capture that information. We have had in this area here now, the 17 year study. So we do have studies that get into areas that tend to be fairly urban. So we do have a lot of information. I tell you, I don't need my sensors to tell me something that I already know and you suspect is true. Our cities were quiet, much quieter during the COVID situation. And it's continued to kind of get a little bit louder, as we've kind of released some of the policies that put us into our homes. And so yes, there is a major change. Now there have been a couple of studies that just come out that are pretty interesting. One, which was in San Francisco looking at the white-crowned sparrow. And they looked at historical data that went back something like 20 years. And they found that the birds in the cities were singing a much softer, 30% softer. >> Really? >> And they, yeah, and they would lower their frequencies. So the way sound works is that if you lower your frequencies that sound can travel farther. And so the males can now hear themselves twice as far just due to the fact that our cities are quieter. So it does have an impact on animals, truly it does. There was some studies back in 2001, during the September, the 9/11 crisis as well, where people are going out and kind of looking at data, acoustic data, and discovering that things were much quieter. I'd be very interested to look at some of the data we have in our oceans, to what extent are oceans quieter. Our oceans sadly are the loudest part of this planet. It's really noisy, sound travels, five times farther. Generally the noise is lower frequencies, and we have lots of ships that are all over the planet and in our oceans. So I'd really be interested in those kinds of studies as well, to what extent is it impacting and helping our friends in the oceans. >> Right, right, well, I was just going to ask you that question because I think a lot of people clearly understand sound in the air that surrounds us, but you talk a lot about sound in ocean, and sound as an indicator of ocean health, and again, this concept of a chorus. And I think everybody's probably familiar with the sounds of the humpback whale right? He got very popular and we've all seen and heard that. But you're doing a lot of research, as you said, in oceans and in water. And I wonder if you can, again, kind of provide a little bit more color around that, because I don't think you people, maybe we're just not that tuned into it, think of the ocean or water as a rich sound environment especially to the degree as you're talking about where you can actually start to really understand what's going on. >> Yeah, I mean, some of us think that sound in the oceans is probably more important to animals than on land, on the terrestrial side. Sound helps animals to navigate through complex waterways and find food resources. You can only use site so far underwater especially when it gets to be kind of dark, once you get down to certain levels. So there many of us think that sound is probably going to be an important component to measuring the status of health in our oceans. >> It's great. Well, Bryan, I really enjoyed this conversation. I've really enjoyed your Ted Talk, and now I've got a bunch of research papers I want to dig into a little bit more as well. >> Okay.(chuckling) >> It's a fascinating topic, but I think the most important thing that you talked about extensively in your Ted Talk is really just taking a minute to take a step back from the individual perspective, appreciate what's around us, hear, that information and I think there's a real direct correlation to the power of exascale, to the power of hearing this data, processing this data, and putting intelligence on that data, understanding that data in a good way, in a positive way, in a delightful way, spiritual way, even that we couldn't do before, or we just weren't paying attention like with what you know is on your phone please-- >> Yeah, really. >> It's all around you. It's been there a whole time. >> Yeah. (both chuckling) >> Yeah, Jeff, I really encourage your viewers to count it, just go out and listen. As we say, go out and listen and join the mission. >> I love it, and you can get started by going to the Center for Global Soundscapes and you have a beautiful landscape. I had it going earlier this morning while I was digging through some of the research of Bryan. (Bryan chuckling) Thank you very much (Bryan murmurs) and really enjoyed the conversation best to you-- >> Okay. >> And your team and your continued success. >> Alright, thank you. >> Alright, thank you. All right, he's Bryan-- >> Goodbye. >> I'm Jeff, you're watching theCUBE. (Bryan chuckling) for continuing coverage of Exascale Day. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (calm ambient music)
SUMMARY :
From around the globe, it's theCUBE, And I'm really excited to and I just loved one of the quotes. I hear the birds, I hear the insects, and some of the work that you guys do. and analyze it as a means to understand A kelp forest and the oceans, a desert, And then to be able to and even folks in the social amount of data that you have and then you have a sense against the known and to for the algorithms that you and our estimates is that we need about And again the basis of your research But I'd love to get your take on cities. So is it better to kind of get them all that connection that's I just love to get your take on cities tend to be fairly limited, And so as I've gone to the dawn chorus in the and you think what should be there-- to explore that more fully. and you identified it in the and you mentioned it quite frequently a lot of things you for the ecosystem to function. of all the animals-- Come back into the city. that tend to be fairly urban. that are all over the planet going to ask you that question to be kind of dark, and now I've got a It's been there a whole time. Yeah. listen and join the mission. the conversation best to you-- and your continued success. Alright, thank you. We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Michiel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Anna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bryan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NEC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kevin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Frampton | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kerim Akgonul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jared | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Wood | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NECJ | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike Olson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michiel Bakker | PERSON | 0.99+ |
FCA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NASA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lee Caswell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ECECT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
OTEL | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David Floyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bryan Pijanowski | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rich Lane | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kerim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kevin Bogusz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jared Woodrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lincolnshire | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Keith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chuck | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
National Health Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Keith Townsend | PERSON | 0.99+ |
WANdisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
March | DATE | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ireland | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rajagopal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Allante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
March of 2012 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Anna Gleiss | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Samsung | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ritika Gunnar | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mandy Dhaliwal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Making AI Real – A practitioner’s view | Exascale Day
>> Narrator: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of Exascale day, made possible by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. >> Hey, welcome back Jeff Frick here with the cube come due from our Palo Alto studios, for their ongoing coverage in the celebration of Exascale day 10 to the 18th on October 18th, 10 with 18 zeros, it's all about big powerful giant computing and computing resources and computing power. And we're excited to invite back our next guest she's been on before. She's Dr. Arti Garg, head of advanced AI solutions and technologies for HPE. Arti great to see you again. >> Great to see you. >> Absolutely. So let's jump into before we get into Exascale day I was just looking at your LinkedIn profile. It's such a very interesting career. You've done time at Lawrence Livermore, You've done time in the federal government, You've done time at GE and industry, I just love if you can share a little bit of your perspective going from hardcore academia to, kind of some government positions, then into industry as a data scientist, and now with originally Cray and now HPE looking at it really from more of a vendor side. >> Yeah. So I think in some ways, I think I'm like a lot of people who've had the title of data scientists somewhere in their history where there's no single path, to really working in this industry. I come from a scientific background. I have a PhD in physics, So that's where I started working with large data sets. I think of myself as a data scientist before the term data scientist was a term. And I think it's an advantage, to be able to have seen this explosion of interest in leveraging data to gain insights, whether that be into the structure of the galaxy, which is what I used to look at, or whether that be into maybe new types of materials that could advance our ability to build lightweight cars or safety gear. It's allows you to take a perspective to not only understand what the technical challenges are, but what also the implementation challenges are, and why it can be hard to use data to solve problems. >> Well, I'd just love to get your, again your perspective cause you are into data, you chose that as your profession, and you probably run with a whole lot of people, that are also like-minded in terms of data. As an industry and as a society, we're trying to get people to do a better job of making database decisions and getting away from their gut and actually using data. I wonder if you can talk about the challenges of working with people who don't come from such an intense data background to get them to basically, I don't know if it's understand the value of more of a data kind decision making process or board just it's worth the effort, cause it's not easy to get the data and cleanse the data, and trust the data and get the right context, working with people that don't come from that background. And aren't so entrenched in that point of view, what surprises you? How do you help them? What can you share in terms of helping everybody get to be a more data centric decision maker? >> So I would actually rephrase the question a little bit Jeff, and say that actually I think people have always made data driven decisions. It's just that in the past we maybe had less data available to us or the quality of it was not as good. And so as a result most organizations have developed organize themselves to make decisions, to run their processes based on a much smaller and more refined set of information, than is currently available both given our ability to generate lots of data, through software and sensors, our ability to store that data. And then our ability to run a lot of computing cycles and a lot of advanced math against that data, to learn things that maybe in the past took, hundreds of years of experiments in scientists to understand. And so before I jumped into, how do you overcome that barrier? Just I'll use an example because you mentioned, I used to work in industry I used to work at GE. And one of the things that I often joked about, is the number of times I discovered Bernoulli's principle, in data coming off a GE jet engines you could do that overnight processing these large data but of course historically that took hundreds of years, to really understand these physical principles. And so I think when it comes to how do we bridge the gap between people who are adapt at processing large amounts of data, and running algorithms to pull insights out? I think it's both sides. I think it's those of us who are coming from the technical background, really understanding the way decisions are currently made, the way process and operations currently work at an organization. And understanding why those things are the way they are maybe their security or compliance or accountability concerns, that a new algorithm can't just replace those. And so I think it's on our end, really trying to understand, and make sure that whatever new approaches we're bringing address those concerns. And I think for folks who aren't necessarily coming from a large data set, and analytical background and when I say analytical, I mean in the data science sense, not in the sense of thinking about things in an abstract way to really recognize that these are just tools, that can enhance what they're doing, and they don't necessarily need to be frightening because I think that people who have been say operating electric grids for a long time, or fixing aircraft engines, they have a lot of expertise and a lot of understanding, and that's really important to making any kind of AI driven solution work. >> That's great insight but that but I do think one thing that's changed you come from a world where you had big data sets, so you kind of have a big data set point of view, where I think for a lot of decision makers they didn't have that data before. So we won't go through all the up until the right explosions of data, and obviously we're talking about Exascale day, but I think for a lot of processes now, the amount of data that they can bring to bear, is so dwarfs what they had in the past that before they even consider how to use it they still have to contextualize it, and they have to manage it and they have to organize it and there's data silos. So there's all this kind of nasty processes stuff, that's in the way some would argue has been kind of a real problem with the promise of BI, and does decision support tools. So as you look at at this new stuff and these new datasets, what are some of the people in process challenges beyond the obvious things that we can think about, which are the technical challenges? >> So I think that you've really hit on, something I talk about sometimes it was kind of a data deluge that we experienced these days, and the notion of feeling like you're drowning in information but really lacking any kind of insight. And one of the things that I like to think about, is to actually step back from the data questions the infrastructure questions, sort of all of these technical questions that can seem very challenging to navigate. And first ask ourselves, what problems am I trying to solve? It's really no different than any other type of decision you might make in an organization to say like, what are my biggest pain points? What keeps me up at night? or what would just transform the way my business works? And those are the problems worth solving. And then the next question becomes, if I had more data if I had a better understanding of something about my business or about my customers or about the world in which we all operate, would that really move the needle for me? And if the answer is yes, then that starts to give you a picture of what you might be able to do with AI, and it starts to tell you which of those data management challenges, whether they be cleaning the data, whether it be organizing the data, what it, whether it be building models on the data are worth solving because you're right, those are going to be a time intensive, labor intensive, highly iterative efforts. But if you know why you're doing it, then you will have a better understanding of why it's worth the effort. And also which shortcuts you can take which ones you can't, because often in order to sort of see the end state you might want to do a really quick experiment or prototype. And so you want to know what matters and what doesn't at least to that. Is this going to work at all time. >> So you're not buying the age old adage that you just throw a bunch of data in a data Lake and the answers will just spring up, just come right back out of the wall. I mean, you bring up such a good point, It's all about asking the right questions and thinking about asking questions. So again, when you talk to people, about helping them think about the questions, cause then you've got to shape the data to the question. And then you've got to start to build the algorithm, to kind of answer that question. How should people think when they're actually building algorithm and training algorithms, what are some of the typical kind of pitfalls that a lot of people fall in, haven't really thought about it before and how should people frame this process? Cause it's not simple and it's not easy and you really don't know that you have the answer, until you run multiple iterations and compare it against some other type of reference? >> Well, one of the things that I like to think about just so that you're sort of thinking about, all the challenges you're going to face up front, you don't necessarily need to solve all of these problems at the outset. But I think it's important to identify them, is I like to think about AI solutions as, they get deployed being part of a kind of workflow, and the workflow has multiple stages associated with it. The first stage being generating your data, and then starting to prepare and explore your data and then building models for your data. But sometimes I think where we don't always think about it is the next two phases, which is deploying whatever model or AI solution you've developed. And what will that really take especially in the ecosystem where it's going to live. If is it going to live in a secure and compliant ecosystem? Is it actually going to live in an outdoor ecosystem? We're seeing more applications on the edge, and then finally who's going to use it and how are they going to drive value from it? Because it could be that your AI solution doesn't work cause you don't have the right dashboard, that highlights and visualizes the data for the decision maker who will benefit from it. So I think it's important to sort of think through all of these stages upfront, and think through maybe what some of the biggest challenges you might encounter at the Mar, so that you're prepared when you meet them, and you can kind of refine and iterate along the way and even upfront tweak the question you're asking. >> That's great. So I want to get your take on we're celebrating Exascale day which is something very specific on 1018, share your thoughts on Exascale day specifically, but more generally I think just in terms of being a data scientist and suddenly having, all this massive compute power. At your disposal yoy're been around for a while. So you've seen the development of the cloud, these huge data sets and really the ability to, put so much compute horsepower against the problems as, networking and storage and compute, just asymptotically approach zero, I mean for as a data scientist you got to be pretty excited about kind of new mysteries, new adventures, new places to go, that we just you just couldn't do it 10 years ago five years ago, 15 years ago. >> Yeah I think that it's, it'll--only time will tell exactly all of the things that we'll be able to unlock, from these new sort of massive computing capabilities that we're going to have. But a couple of things that I'm very excited about, are that in addition to sort of this explosion or these very large investments in large supercomputers Exascale super computers, we're also seeing actually investment in these other types of scientific instruments that when I say scientific it's not just academic research, it's driving pharmaceutical drug discovery because we're talking about these, what they call light sources which shoot x-rays at molecules, and allow you to really understand the structure of the molecules. What Exascale allows you to do is, historically it's been that you would go take your molecule to one of these light sources and you shoot your, x-rays edit and you would generate just masses and masses of data, terabytes of data it was each shot. And being able to then understand, what you were looking at was a long process, getting computing time and analyzing the data. We're on the precipice of being able to do that, if not in real time much closer to real time. And I don't really know what happens if instead of coming up with a few molecules, taking them, studying them, and then saying maybe I need to do something different. I can do it while I'm still running my instrument. And I think that it's very exciting, from the perspective of someone who's got a scientific background who likes using large data sets. There's just a lot of possibility of what Exascale computing allows us to do in from the standpoint of I don't have to wait to get results, and I can either stimulate much bigger say galaxies, and really compare that to my data or galaxies or universes, if you're an astrophysicist or I can simulate, much smaller finer details of a hypothetical molecule and use that to predict what might be possible, from a materials or drug perspective, just to name two applications that I think Exascale could really drive. >> That's really great feedback just to shorten that compute loop. We had an interview earlier in some was talking about when the, biggest workload you had to worry about was the end of the month when you're running your financial, And I was like, why wouldn't that be nice to be the biggest job that we have to worry about? But now I think we saw some of this at animation, in the movie business when you know the rendering for whether it's a full animation movie, or just something that's a heavy duty three effects. When you can get those dailies back to the, to the artist as you said while you're still working, or closer to when you're working versus having this, huge kind of compute delay, it just changes the workflow dramatically and the pace of change and the pace of output. Because you're not context switching as much and you can really get back into it. That's a super point. I want to shift gears a little bit, and talk about explainable AI. So this is a concept that a lot of people hopefully are familiar with. So AI you build the algorithm it's in a box, it runs and it kicks out an answer. And one of the things that people talk about, is we should be able to go in and pull that algorithm apart to know, why it came out with the answer that it did. To me this just sounds really really hard because it's smart people like you, that are writing the algorithms the inputs and the and the data that feeds that thing, are super complex. The math behind it is very complex. And we know that the AI trains and can change over time as you you train the algorithm it gets more data, it adjusts itself. So it's explainable AI even possible? Is it possible at some degree? Because I do think it's important. And my next question is going to be about ethics, to know why something came out. And the other piece that becomes so much more important, is as we use that output not only to drive, human based decision that needs some more information, but increasingly moving it over to automation. So now you really want to know why did it do what it did explainable AI? Share your thoughts. >> It's a great question. And it's obviously a question that's on a lot of people's mind these days. I'm actually going to revert back to what I said earlier, when I talked about Bernoulli's principle, and just the ability sometimes when you do throw an algorithm at data, it might come the first thing it will find is probably some known law of physics. And so I think that really thinking about what do we mean by explainable AI, also requires us to think about what do we mean by AI? These days AI is often used anonymously with deep learning which is a particular type of algorithm that is not very analytical at its core. And what I mean by that is, other types of statistical machine learning models, have some underlying theory of what the population of data that you're studying. And whereas deep learning doesn't, it kind of just learns whatever pattern is sitting in front of it. And so there is a sense in which if you look at other types of algorithms, they are inherently explainable because you're choosing your algorithm based on what you think the is the sort of ground truth, about the population you're studying. And so I think we going to get to explainable deep learning. I think it's kind of challenging because you're always going to be in a position, where deep learning is designed to just be as flexible as possible. I'm sort of throw more math at the problem, because there may be are things that your sort of simpler model doesn't account for. However deep learning could be, part of an explainable AI solution. If for example, it helps you identify what are important so called features to look at what are the important aspects of your data. So I don't know it depends on what you mean by AI, but are you ever going to get to the point where, you don't need humans sort of interpreting outputs, and making some sets of judgments about what a set of computer algorithms that are processing data think. I think it will take, I don't want to say I know what's going to happen 50 years from now, but I think it'll take a little while to get to the point where you don't have, to maybe apply some subject matter understanding and some human judgment to what an algorithm is putting out. >> It's really interesting we had Dr. Robert Gates on a years ago at another show, and he talked about the only guns in the U.S. military if I'm getting this right, that are automatic, that will go based on what the computer tells them to do, and start shooting are on the Korean border. But short of that there's always a person involved, before anybody hits a button which begs a question cause we've seen this on the big data, kind of curve, i think Gartner has talked about it, as we move up from kind of descriptive analytics diagnostic analytics, predictive, and then prescriptive and then hopefully autonomous. So I wonder so you're saying will still little ways in that that last little bumps going to be tough to overcome to get to the true autonomy. >> I think so and you know it's going to be very application dependent as well. So it's an interesting example to use the DMZ because that is obviously also a very, mission critical I would say example but in general I think that you'll see autonomy. You already do see autonomy in certain places, where I would say the States are lower. So if I'm going to have some kind of recommendation engine, that suggests if you look at the sweater maybe like that one, the risk of getting that wrong. And so fully automating that as a little bit lower, because the risk is you don't buy the sweater. I lose a little bit of income I lose a little bit of revenue as a retailer, but the risk of I make that turn, because I'm going to autonomous vehicle as much higher. So I think that you will see the progression up that curve being highly dependent on what's at stake, with different degrees of automation. That being said you will also see in certain places where there's, it's either really expensive or it's humans aren't doing a great job. You may actually start to see some mission critical automation. But those would be the places where you're seeing them. And actually I think that's one of the reasons why you see actually a lot more autonomy, in the agriculture space, than you do in the sort of passenger vehicle space. Because there's a lot at stake and it's very difficult for human beings to sort of drive large combines. >> plus they have a real they have a controlled environment. So I've interviewed Caterpillar they're doing a ton of stuff with autonomy. Cause they're there control that field, where those things are operating, and whether it's a field or a mine, it's actually fascinating how far they've come with autonomy. But let me switch to a different industry that I know is closer to your heart, and looking at some other interviews and let's talk about diagnosing disease. And if we take something specific like reviewing x-rays where the computer, and it also brings in the whole computer vision and bringing in computer vision algorithms, excuse me they can see things probably fast or do a lot more comparisons, than potentially a human doctor can. And or hopefully this whole signal to noise conversation elevate the signal for the doctor to review, and suppress the noise it's really not worth their time. They can also review a lot of literature, and hopefully bring a broader potential perspective of potential diagnoses within a set of symptoms. You said before you both your folks are physicians, and there's a certain kind of magic, a nuance, almost like kind of more childlike exploration to try to get out of the algorithm if you will to think outside the box. I wonder if you can share that, synergy between using computers and AI and machine learning to do really arduous nasty things, like going through lots and lots and lots and lots of, x-rays compared to and how that helps with, doctor who's got a whole different kind of set of experience a whole different kind of empathy, whole different type of relationship with that patient, than just a bunch of pictures of their heart or their lungs. >> I think that one of the things is, and this kind of goes back to this question of, is AI for decision support versus automation? And I think that what AI can do, and what we're pretty good at these days, with computer vision is picking up on subtle patterns right now especially if you have a very large data set. So if I can train on lots of pictures of lungs, it's a lot easier for me to identify the pictures that somehow these are not like the other ones. And that can be helpful but I think then to really interpret what you're seeing and understand is this. Is it actually bad quality image? Is it some kind of some kind of medical issue? And what is the medical issue? I think that's where bringing in, a lot of different types of knowledge, and a lot of different pieces of information. Right now I think humans are a little bit better at doing that. And some of that's because I don't think we have great ways to train on, sort of sparse datasets I guess. And the second part is that human beings might be 40 years of training a model. They 50 years of training a model as opposed to six months, or something with sparse information. That's another thing that human beings have their sort of lived experience, and the data that they bring to bear, on any type of prediction or classification is actually more than just say what they saw in their medical training. It might be the people they've met, the places they've lived what have you. And I think that's that part that sort of broader set of learning, and how things that might not be related might actually be related to your understanding of what you're looking at. I think we've got a ways to go from a sort of artificial intelligence perspective and developed. >> But it is Exascale day. And we all know about the compound exponential curves on the computing side. But let's shift gears a little bit. I know you're interested in emerging technology to support this effort, and there's so much going on in terms of, kind of the atomization of compute store and networking to be able to break it down into smaller, smaller pieces, so that you can really scale the amount of horsepower that you need to apply to a problem, to very big or to very small. Obviously the stuff that you work is more big than small. Work on GPU a lot of activity there. So I wonder if you could share, some of the emerging technologies that you're excited about to bring again more tools to the task. >> I mean, one of the areas I personally spend a lot of my time exploring are, I guess this word gets used a lot, the Cambrian explosion of new AI accelerators. New types of chips that are really designed for different types of AI workloads. And as you sort of talked about going down, and it's almost in a way where we were sort of going back and looking at these large systems, but then exploring each little component on them, and trying to really optimize that or understand how that component contributes to the overall performance of the whole. And I think one of the things that just, I don't even know there's probably close to a hundred active vendors in the space of developing new processors, and new types of computer chips. I think one of the things that that points to is, we're moving in the direction of generally infrastructure heterogeneity. So it used to be when you built a system you probably had one type of processor, or you probably had a pretty uniform fabric across your system you usually had, I think maybe storage we started to get tearing a little bit earlier. But now I think that what we're going to see, and we're already starting to see it with Exascale systems where you've got GPUs and CPUs on the same blades, is we're starting to see as the workloads that are running at large scales are becoming more complicated. Maybe I'm doing some simulation and then I'm running I'm training some kind of AI model, and then I'm inferring it on some other type, some other output of the simulation. I need to have the ability to do a lot of different things, and do them in at a very advanced level. Which means I need very specialized technology to do it. And I think it's an exciting time. And I think we're going to test, we're going to break a lot of things. I probably shouldn't say that in this interview, but I'm hopeful that we're going to break some stuff. We're going to push all these systems to the limit, and find out where we actually need to push a little harder. And I some of the areas I think that we're going to see that, is there We're going to want to move data, and move data off of scientific instruments, into computing, into memory, into a lot of different places. And I'm really excited to see how it plays out, and what you can do and where the limits are of what you can do with the new systems. >> Arti I could talk to you all day. I love the experience and the perspective, cause you've been doing this for a long time. So I'm going to give you the final word before we sign out and really bring it back, to a more human thing which is ethics. So one of the conversations we hear all the time, is that if you are going to do something, if you're going to put together a project and you justify that project, and then you go and you collect the data and you run that algorithm and you do that project. That's great but there's like an inherent problem with, kind of data collection that may be used for something else down the road that maybe you don't even anticipate. So I just wonder if you can share, kind of top level kind of ethical take on how data scientists specifically, and then ultimately more business practitioners and other people that don't carry that title. Need to be thinking about ethics and not just kind of forget about it. That these are I had a great interview with Paul Doherty. Everybody's data is not just their data, it's it represents a person, It's a representation of what they do and how they lives. So when you think about kind of entering into a project and getting started, what do you think about in terms of the ethical considerations and how should people be cautious that they don't go places that they probably shouldn't go? >> I think that's a great question out a short answer. But I think that I honestly don't know that we have a great solutions right now, but I think that the best we can do is take a very multifaceted, and also vigilant approach to it. So when you're collecting data, and often we should remember a lot of the data that gets used isn't necessarily collected for the purpose it's being used, because we might be looking at old medical records, or old any kind of transactional records whether it be from a government or a business. And so as you start to collect data or build solutions, try to think through who are all the people who might use it? And what are the possible ways in which it could be misused? And also I encourage people to think backwards. What were the biases in place that when the data were collected, you see this a lot in the criminal justice space is the historical records reflect, historical biases in our systems. And so is I there are limits to how much you can correct for previous biases, but there are some ways to do it, but you can't do it if you're not thinking about it. So I think, sort of at the outset of developing solutions, that's important but I think equally important is putting in the systems to maintain the vigilance around it. So one don't move to autonomy before you know, what potential new errors you might or new biases you might introduce into the world. And also have systems in place to constantly ask these questions. Am I perpetuating things I don't want to perpetuate? Or how can I correct for them? And be willing to scrap your system and start from scratch if you need to. >> Well Arti thank you. Thank you so much for your time. Like I said I could talk to you for days and days and days. I love the perspective and the insight and the thoughtfulness. So thank you for sharing your thoughts, as we celebrate Exascale day. >> Thank you for having me. >> My pleasure thank you. All right she's Arti I'm Jeff it's Exascale day. We're covering on the queue thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (bright upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Narrator: From around the globe, Arti great to see you again. I just love if you can share a little bit And I think it's an advantage, and you probably run with and that's really important to making and they have to manage it and it starts to tell you which of those the data to the question. and then starting to prepare that we just you just and really compare that to my and pull that algorithm apart to know, and some human judgment to what the computer tells them to do, because the risk is you the doctor to review, and the data that they bring to bear, and networking to be able to break it down And I some of the areas I think Arti I could talk to you all day. in the systems to maintain and the thoughtfulness. We're covering on the
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
50 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul Doherty | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Arti | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bernoulli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Arti Garg | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
hundreds of years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
1018 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Dr. | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Exascale | TITLE | 0.98+ |
each shot | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Caterpillar | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Robert Gates | PERSON | 0.98+ |
15 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ | |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first stage | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
Exascale day | EVENT | 0.95+ |
two applications | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
October 18th | DATE | 0.94+ |
two phases | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
18th | DATE | 0.91+ |
10 | DATE | 0.9+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
U.S. military | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
one type | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
a years ago | DATE | 0.81+ |
each little component | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
single path | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
Korean border | LOCATION | 0.72+ |
hundred | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
terabytes of data | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
18 zeros | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
three effects | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
one of these light | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
Exascale Day | EVENT | 0.68+ |
Exascale | EVENT | 0.67+ |
things | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
Cray | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
Exascale day 10 | EVENT | 0.6+ |
Lawrence Livermore | PERSON | 0.56+ |
vendors | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
few | QUANTITY | 0.52+ |
reasons | QUANTITY | 0.46+ |
lots | QUANTITY | 0.46+ |
Cambrian | OTHER | 0.43+ |
DMZ | ORGANIZATION | 0.41+ |
Exascale | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.39+ |
BizOps Manifesto Unveiled V2
>>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage, a BizOps manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. >>Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with the cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of the biz ops manifesto. Unveil. Something has been in the works for a little while. Today's the formal unveiling, and we're excited to have three of the core founding members of the manifesto authors of the manifesto. If you will, uh, joining us again, we've had them all on individually. Now we're going to have a great power panel. First up. We're gonna have Mitt Kirsten returning he's the founder and CEO of Tasktop mic. Good to see you again. Where are you dialing in from? >>Great to see you again, Jeff I'm dialing from Vancouver, >>We're Canada, Vancouver, Canada. One of my favorite cities in the whole wide world. Also we've got Tom Davenport come in from across the country. He's a distinguished professor and author from Babson college, Tom. Great to see you. And I think you said you're at a fun, exotic place on the East coast >>Realm of Memphis shoes. That's on Cape Cod. >>Great to see you again and also joining surge Lucio. He is the VP and general manager enterprise software division at Broadcom surge. Great to see you again, where are you coming in from? >>Uh, from Boston right next to Cape Cod. >>Terrific. So welcome back, everybody again. Congratulations on this day. I know it's been a lot of work to get here for this unveil, but let's just jump into it. The biz ops manifesto, what was the initial reason to do this? And how did you decide to do it in a kind of a coalition, a way bringing together a group of people versus just making it an internal company, uh, initiative that, you know, you can do better stuff within your own company, surge, why don't we start with you? >>Yeah, so, so I think we were at a really critical juncture, right? Many, um, large enterprises are basically struggling with their digital transformation. Um, in fact, um, many recognized that, uh, the, the business side, it collaboration has been, uh, one of the major impediments, uh, to drive that kind of transformation. That, and if we look at the industry today, many people are, whether we're talking about vendors or, um, you know, system integrators, consulting firms are talking about the same kind of concepts, but using very different language. And so we believe that bringing all these different players together, um, as part of the coalition and formalizing, uh, basically the core principles and values in a BizOps manifesto, we can really start to F could have a much bigger movement where we can all talk about kind of the same concepts and we can really start to provide, could have a much better support for large organizations to, to transform. Uh, so whether it is technology or services or, um, or training, I think that that's really the value of bringing all of these players together, right. >>And mic to you. Why did you get involved in this, in this effort? >>So I've been closely involved the agile movement since it started two decades with that manifesto. And I think we got a lot of improvement at the team level, and I think that was just no. Did we really need to improve at the business level? Every company is trying to become a software innovator, trying to make sure that they can pivot quickly and the changing market economy and what everyone's dealing with in terms of needing to deliver value to customers sooner. However, agile practices have really focused on these metrics, these measures and understanding processes that help teams be productive. Those things now need to be elevated to the business as a whole. And that just hasn't happened. Uh, organizations are actually failing because they're measuring activities and how they're becoming more agile, how teams are functioning, not how much quickly they're delivering value to the customer. So we need to now move past that. And that's exactly what the manifesto provides. Right, >>Right, right. And Tom, to you, you've been covering tech for a very long time. You've been looking at really hard challenges and a lot of work around analytics and data and data evolution. So there's a definitely a data angle here. I wonder if you could kind of share your perspective of what you got excited to, uh, to sign onto this manifesto. >>Sure. Well, I have, you know, for the past 15 or 20 years, I've been focusing on data and analytics and AI, but before that I was a process management guy and a knowledge management guy. And in general, I think, you know, we've just kind of optimize that to narrow a level, whether you're talking about agile or dev ops or ML ops, any of these kinds of ops oriented movements, we're making individual project, um, performance and productivity better, but we're not changing the business, uh, effectively enough. And that's the thing that appealed to me about the biz ops idea, that we're finally creating a closer connection between what we do with technology and how it changes the business and provides value to it. >>Great. Uh, surge back to you, right? I mean, people have been talking about digital transformation for a long time and it's been, you know, kind of trucking along and then covert hit and it was instant Lightswitch. Everyone's working from home. You've got a lot more reliance on your digital tools, digital communication, uh, both within your customer base and your partner base, but also then your employees when you're, if you could share how that really pushed this all along. Right? Because now suddenly the acceleration of digital transformation is higher. Even more importantly, you got much more critical decisions to make into what you do next. So kind of your portfolio management of projects has been elevated significantly when maybe revenues are down, uh, and you really have to, uh, to prioritize and get it right. >>Yeah. Maybe I'll just start by quoting Satina Nello basically recently said that they're speeding the two years of digital preservation just last two months in any many ways. That's true. Um, but yet when we look at large enterprises, they're still struggling with a kind of a changes in culture. They really need to drive to be able to disrupt themselves. And not surprisingly, you know, when we look at certain parts of the industry, you know, we see some things which are very disturbing, right? So about 40% of the personal loans today are being, uh, origin data it's by fintechs, uh, of a like of Sophie or, uh, or a lending club, right? Not to a traditional brick and mortar for BEC. And so the, well, there is kind of a much more of an appetite and it's a, it's more of a survival type of driver these days. >>Uh, the reality is that's in order for these large enterprises to truly transform and engage on this digital transformation, they need to start to really align the business nightie, you know, in many ways and make cover. Does agile really emerge from the core desire to truly improve software predictability between which we've really missed is all the way we start to aligning the software predictability to business predictability, and to be able to have continual sleep continuous improvement and measurement of business outcomes. So by aligning that of these, uh, discuss inward metrics, that's, it is typically being using to business outcomes. We think we can start to really ELP, uh, different stakeholders within the organization to collaborate. So I think there is more than ever. There's an imperative to acts now. Um, and, and resolves, I think is kind of the right approach to drive that kind of transformation. Right. >>I want to follow up on the culture comment, uh, with you, Tom, because you've talked before about kind of process flow and process flow throughout a whore and an organization. And, you know, we talk about people process and tech all the time. And I think the tech is the easy part compared to actually changing the people the way they think. And then the actual processes that they put in place. It's a much more difficult issue than just the tech issue to get this digital transformation in your organization. >>Yeah. You know, I've always found that the soft stuff about, you know, the culture of a behavior, the values is the hard stuff to change and more and more, we, we realized that to be successful with any kind of digital transformation you have to change people's behaviors and attitudes. Um, we haven't made as much progress in that area as we might have. I mean, I've done some surveys suggesting that most organizations still don't have data driven cultures. And in many cases there is a lower percentage of companies that say they have that then, um, did a few years ago. So we're kind of moving in the wrong direction, which means I think that we have to start explicitly addressing that, um, cultural, behavioral dimension and not just assuming that it will happen if we, if we build system, if we build it, they won't necessarily come. Right. >>Right. So I want to go to you Nick. Cause you know, we're talking about workflows and flow, um, and, and you've written about flow both in terms of, um, you know, moving things along a process and trying to find bottlenecks, identify bottlenecks, which is now even more important again, when these decisions are much more critical. Cause you have a lot less, uh, wiggle room in tough times, but you also talked about flow from the culture side and the people side. So I wonder if you can just share your thoughts on, you know, using flow as a way to think about things, to get the answers better. >>Yeah, absolutely. And I'll refer back to what Tom has said. If you're optimized, you need to optimize your system. You need to optimize how you innovate and how you deliver value to the business and the customer. Now, what we've noticed in the data, since that we've learned from customers, value streams, enterprise organizations, value streams, is that when it's taking six months at the end to deliver that value with the flow is that slow. You've got a bunch of unhappy developers, unhappy customers when you're innovating half so high performing organizations, we can measure third and 10 float time and dates. All of a sudden that feedback loop, the satisfaction your developer's measurably goes up. So not only do you have people context, switching glass, you're delivering so much more value to customers at a lower cost because you've optimized for flow rather than optimizing for these other approximate tricks that we use, which is how efficient is my agile team. How quickly can we deploy software? Those are important, but they do not provide the value of agility of fast learning of adaptability to the business. And that's exactly what the biz ops manifesto pushes your organization to do. You need to put in place this new operating model that's based on flow on the delivery of business value and on bringing value to market much more quickly than you were before. Right. >>I love that. And I'm going back to you, Tom, on that to follow up. Cause I think, I don't think people think enough about how they prioritize what they're optimizing for. Cause you know, if you're optimizing for a versus B, you know, you can have a very different product that you kick out and let you know. My favorite example is with Clayton Christianson and innovator's dilemma talking about the three inch hard drive. If you optimize it for power, you know, is one thing, if you optimize it for vibration is another thing and sure enough, you know, they missed it on the poem because it was the, it was the game console, which, which drove that whole business. So when you, when you're talking to customers and we think we hear it with cloud all the time, people optimizing for cost efficiency, instead of thinking about it as an innovation tool, how do you help them kind of rethink and really, you know, force them to, to look at the, at the prioritization and make sure they're prioritizing on the right thing is make just said, what are you optimizing for? >>Oh yeah. Um, you have one of the most important aspects of any decision or, um, attempt to resolve a problem in an organization is the framing process. And, um, you know, it's, it's a difficult aspect of the decision to frame it correctly in the first place. Um, there, it's not a technology issue. In many cases, it's largely a human issue, but if you frame that decision or that problem incorrectly to narrowly say, or you frame it as an either or situation where you could actually have some of both, um, it, it's very difficult for the, um, process to work out correctly. So in many cases that I think we need to think more at the beginning about how we bring this issue or this decision in the best way possible before we charge off and build a system to support it. You know, um, it's worth that extra time to think, think carefully about how the decision has been structured, right >>Surgery. I want to go back to you and talk about the human factors because as we just discussed, you can put it in great technology, but if the culture doesn't adopt it and people don't feel good about it, you know, it's not going to be successful and that's going to reflect poorly on the technology, even if it had nothing to do with it. And you know, when you look at the, the, the core values, uh, of the Bezos manifesto, you know, a big one is trust and collaboration, you know, learn, respond and pivot. I wonder if you can share your thoughts on, on trying to get that cultural shift, uh, so that you can have success with the people or excuse me, with the technology in the process and helping customers, you know, take this more trustworthy and kind of proactive, uh, position. >>So I think, I think at the ground level, it truly starts with the realization that we're all different. We come from different backgrounds. Um, oftentimes we tend to blame the data. It's not uncommon my experiments that we spend the first 30 minutes of any kind of one hour conversation to debate the validity of the data. Um, and so, um, one of the first kind of, uh, probably manifestations that we've had or revelations as we start to engage with our customers is spike, just exposing, uh, high-fidelity data sets to different stakeholders from their different lens. We start to enable these different stakeholders to not debate the data. That's really collaborate to find a solution. So in many ways, when, when, when we think about kind of the types of changes we're trying to, to truly affect around data driven decision making, it's all about bringing the data in context, in the context that is relevant and understandable for, for different stakeholders, whether we're talking about an operator or develop for a business analyst. >>So that's, that's the first thing. The second layer I think, is really to provide context to what people are doing in their specific cycle. And so I think one of the best examples I have is if you start to be able to align business KPI, whether you are counting, you know, sales per hour, or the engagements of your users on your mobile applications, whatever it is, you can start to connect that PKI to the business KPI, to the KPIs that developers might be looking at, whether it is the number of defects or a velocity or whatever, you know, metrics that they are used to to actually track you start to, to be able to actually contextualize in what we are the effecting, basically a metric that is really relevant in which we see is that DC is a much more systematic way to approach the transformation than say, you know, some organizations kind of creating, uh, some of these new products or services or initiatives, um, to, to drive engagements, right? >>So if you look at zoom, for instance, zoom giving away a it service to, uh, to education, he's all about, I mean, there's obviously a marketing aspect in therapists. It's fundamentally about trying to drive also the engagement of their own teams. And because now they're doing something for good and the organizations are trying to do that, but you only can do this kind of things in a limited way. And so you really want to start to rethink how you connect to, everybody's kind of a business objective fruit data, and now you start to get people to stare at the same data from their own lens and collaborate on all the data. Right, >>Right. That's a good, uh, Tom, I want to go back to you. You've been studying it for a long time, writing lots of books and getting into it. Um, why now, you know, what w why now are we finally aligning business objectives with, with it objectives? You know, why didn't this happen before? And, you know, what are the factors that are making now the time for this, this, this move with the, uh, with the biz ops? >>Well, and much of the past, it was sort of a back office related activity. And, you know, it was important for, um, uh, producing your paychecks and, uh, um, capturing the customer orders, but the business wasn't built around it now, every organization needs to be a software business, a data business, a digital business, the auntie has been raised considerably. And if you aren't making that connection between your business objectives and the technology that supports it, you run a pretty big risk of, you know, going out of business or losing out to competitors. Totally. So, um, and, uh, even if you're in a, an industry that hasn't historically been terribly, um, technology oriented customer expectations flow from, uh, you know, the digital native, um, companies that they work with to basically every industry. So you're compared against the best in the world. So we don't really have the luxury anymore of screwing up our it projects or building things that don't really work for the business. Um, it's mission critical that we do that well. Um, almost every time, I just want to follow up by that, Tom, >>In terms of the, you've talked extensively about kind of these evolutions of data and analytics from artismal stage to the big data stage, the data economy stage, the AI driven stage and what I find diff interesting that all those stages, you always put a start date. You never put an end date. Um, so you know, is the, is the big data I'm just going to use that generically a moment in time finally here, where we're, you know, off mahogany row with the data scientists, but actually can start to see the promise of delivering the right insight to the right person at the right time to make that decision. >>Well, I think it is true that in general, these previous stages never seemed to go away. The, um, the artisinal stuff is still being done, but we would like for less than less of it to be artisinal, we can't really afford for everything to be artisinal anymore. It's too labor and time consuming to do things that way. So we shift more and more of it to be done through automation and B to be done with a higher level of productivity. And, um, you know, at some point maybe we reached the stage where we don't do anything artisanally anymore. I'm not sure we're there yet, but, you know, we are, we are making progress. Right, >>Right. And Mick, back to you in terms of looking at agile, cause you're, you're such a, a student of agile when, when you look at the opportunity with ops, um, and taking the lessons from agile, you know, what's been the inhibitor to stop this in the past. And what are you so excited about? You know, taking this approach will enable. >>Yeah. I think both Sergeant Tom hit on this is that in agile what's happened is that we've been measuring tiny subsets of the value stream, right? We need to elevate the data's there. Developers are working on these tools that delivering features that the foundations for, for great culture are there. I spent two decades as a developer. And when I was really happy is when I was able to deliver value to customers, the quicker I was able to do that the fewer impediments are in my way, that quicker was deployed and running in the cloud, the happier I was, and that's exactly what's happening. If we can just get the right data, uh, elevated to the business, not just to the agile teams, but really these values of ours are to make sure that you've got these data driven decisions with meaningful data that's oriented around delivering value to customers. Not only these legacies that Tom touched on, which has cost center metrics from an ITK, from where, for it being a cost center and something that provided email and then back office systems. So we need to rapidly shift to those new, meaningful metrics that are customized business centric and make sure that every development the organization is focused on those as well as the business itself, that we're measuring value and that we're helping that value flow without interruptions. >>I love that mic. Cause if you don't measure it, you can't improve on it and you gotta, but you gotta be measuring the right thing. So gentlemen, uh, thank you again for, for your time. Congratulations on the, uh, on the unveil of the biz ops manifesto and together this coalition >>Of, of, uh, industry experts to get behind this. And, you know, there's probably never been a more important time than now to make sure that your prioritization is in the right spot and you're not wasting resources where you're not going to get the ROI. So, uh, congratulations again. And thank you for sharing your thoughts with us here on the cube. Alright, so we had surge, Tom and Mick I'm. Jeff, you're watching the cube, it's a biz ops manifesto and unveil. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of BizOps manifesto, unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition and welcome back Friday, Jeff Frick here with the cube we're in our Palo Alto studios. And we'd like to welcome you back to our continuing coverage of biz ops manifesto, unveil exciting day to really, uh, kind of bring this out into public. There's been a little bit of conversation, but today's really the official unveiling and we're excited to have our next guest to share a little bit more information on it. He's Patrick tickle. He's a chief product officer for planned view. Patrick. Great to see you. Yeah, it's great to be here. Thanks for the invite. So why the biz ops manifesto, why the biz optical edition now when you guys have been at it, it's relatively mature marketplace businesses. Good. What was missing? Why, why this, uh, why this coalition? >>Yeah, so, you know, again, why is, why is biz ops important and why is this something I'm, you know, I'm so excited about, but I think companies as well, right. Well, you know, in some ways or another, this is a topic that I've been talking to, you know, the market and our customers about for a long time. And it's, you know, I really applaud, you know, this whole movement, right. And, um, in resonates with me, because I think one of the fundamental flaws, frankly, of the way we've talked about technology and business literally for decades, uh, has been this idea of, uh, alignment. Those who know me, I occasionally get off on this little rant about the word alignment, right. But to me, the word alignment is, is actually indicative of the, of the, of the flaw in a lot of our organizations and biz ops is really, I think now trying to catalyze and expose that flaw. >>Right. Because, you know, I always say that, you know, you know, alignment implies silos, right. Instantaneously, as soon as you say there's alignment, there's, there's obviously somebody who's got a direction and other people that have to line up and that, that kind of siloed, uh, nature of organizations. And then frankly, the passive nature of it. Right. I think so many technology organizations are like, look, the business has the strategy you guys need to align. Right. And, and, you know, as a product leader, right. That's where I've been my whole career. Right. I can tell you that I never sit around. I almost never use the word alignment. Right. I mean, whether I never sit down and say, you know, the product management team has to get aligned with Deb, right. Or the dev team has to get aligned with the delivery and ops teams. I mean, what I say is, you know, are we on strategy, right? >>Like we've, we have a strategy as a, as a full end to end value stream. Right. And that there's no silos. And I mean, look, every on any given day we got to get better. Right. But the context, the context we operate is not about alignment. Right. It's about being on strategy. And I think I've talked to customers a lot about that, but when I first read the manifesto, I was like, Oh yeah, this is exactly. This is breaking down. Maybe trying to eliminate the word alignment, you know, from a lot of our organizations, because we literally start thinking about one strategy and how we go from strategy to delivery and have it be our strategy, not someone else's that we're all aligning to it. And it's a great way to catalyze that conversation. That I've, it's been in my mind for years, to be honest. Right. >>So, so much to unpack there. One of the things obviously, uh, stealing a lot from, from dev ops and the dev ops manifesto from 20 years ago. And as I look through some of the principles and I looked through some of the values, which are, you know, really nicely laid out here, you know, satisfy customers, do continuous delivery, uh, measure, output against real results. Um, the ones that, that jumps out though is really about, you know, change, change, right? Requirements should change frequently. They do change frequently, but I'm curious to get your take from a, from a software development point, it's easy to kind of understand, right. We're making this widget and our competitors, beta widget plus X, and now we need to change our plans and make sure that the plus X gets added to the plan. Maybe it wasn't in the plan, but you talked a lot about product strategy. So in this kind of continuous delivery world, how does that meld with, I'm actually trying to set a strategy, which implies the direction for a little bit further out on the horizon and to stay on that while at the same time, you're kind of doing this real time continual adjustments. Cause you're not working off a giant PRD or MRD anymore. >>Yeah, yeah, totally. Yeah. You know, one of the terms, you know, that we use internally a lot and even with my customers, our customers is we talked about this idea of rewiring, right. And I think, you know, it's kind of a, now an analogy for transformation. And I think a lot of us have to rewire the way we think about things. Right. And I think at Planview where we have a lot of customers who live in that, you know, who operationalize that traditional PPM world. Right. And are shifting to agile and transforming that rewire is super important. And, and to your point, right, it's, you've just, you've got to embrace this idea of, you know, just iterative getting better every day and iterating, iterating, iterating as to building annual plans or, you know, I get customers occasionally who asked me for two or three year roadmap. >>Right. And I literally looked at them and I go, there's no, there's no scenario where I can build a two or three year roadmap. Right. You, you, you think you want that, but that's not, that's not the way we run. Right. And I will tell you the biggest thing that for us, you know, that I think is matched the planning, uh, you know, patents is a word I like to use a lot. So the thing that we've like, uh, that we've done from a planning perspective, I think is matched impedance to continuous delivery is instituting the whole program, implement, you know, the program, increment planning, capabilities and methodologies, um, in the scaled agile world. Right. And over the last 18 months to two years, we really have now, you know, instrumented our company across three value streams. You know, we do quarterly PI program increment 10 week planning, you know, and that becomes, that becomes the Terra firma of how we plant. >>Right. And it's, what are we doing for the next 10 weeks? And we iterate within those 10 weeks, but we also know that 10 weeks from now, we're going to, we're going to adjust iterate again. Right. And that shifting of that planning model, you know, to being as cross-functional is that as that big room planning kind of model is, um, and also, uh, you know, on that shorter increment, when you get those two things in place, all sudden the impedance really starts to match up, uh, with continuous delivery and it changes, it changes the way you plan and it changes the way you work. Right? >>Yeah. Their thing. Right. So obviously a lot of these things are kind of process driven, both within the values, as well as the principles, but there's a whole lot, really about culture. And I just want to highlight a couple of the values, right? We already talked about business outcomes, um, trust and collaboration, uh, data driven decisions, and then learn, respond and pivot. Right. A lot of those are cultural as much as they are process. So again, is it the, is it the need to really kind of just put them down on paper and you know, I can't help, but think of, you know, the hammering up the, uh, the thing in the Lutheran church with their, with their manifesto, is it just good to get it down on paper? Because when you read these things, you're like, well, of course we should trust people. And of course we need an environment of collaboration and of course we want data driven decisions, but as we all know saying it and living, it are two very, very different things. >>Yeah. Good question. I mean, I think there's a lot of ways you bring that to life you're right. And just hanging up, you know, I think we've all been through the hanging up posters around your office, which these days, right. Unless you're going to hang a poster and everybody's home office. Right. You can't even, you can't even fake it that you think that might work. Right. So, um, you know, you really, I think we've attacked that in a variety of ways. Right. And you definitely have to, you know, you've got to make the shift to a team centric culture, right. Empowered teams, you know, that's a big deal. Right. You know, a lot of, a lot of the people that, you know, we lived in a world of quote unquote, where we were lived in a deep resource management world for a long, long time. >>And right. A lot of our customers still do that, but you know, kind of moving to that team centric world is, uh, is really important and core the trust. Um, I think training is super important, right. We've, you know, we've internally, right. We've trained hundreds employees over the last a year and a half on the fundamentals really of safe. Right. Not necessarily, you know, we've had, we've had teams delivering in scrum and the continuous delivery for, you know, for years, but the scaling aspect of it, uh, is where we've done a lot of training and investment. Um, and then, you know, I think, uh, leadership has to be bought in. Right. You know? And so when we pie plan, you know, myself and Cameron and the other members of our leadership, you know, we're NPI planning, you know, for, for four days. Right. I mean, it's, it's, you've got to walk the walk, you know, from top to bottom and you've got to train on the context. Right. And then you, and then, and, and then once you get through a few cycles where you've done a pivot, right. Or you brought a new team in, and it just works, it becomes kind of this virtuous circle where he'll go, man, this really works so much better than what we used to do. Right. >>Right. The other really key principle to this whole thing is, is aligning, you know, the business leaders and the business prioritization, um, so that you can get to good outcomes with the development and the delivery. Right. And we, we know again, and kind of classic dev ops to get the dev and the production people together. So they can, you know, quickly ship code that works. Um, but adding the business person on there really puts, puts a little extra responsibility that they, they understand the value of a particular feature or particular priority. Uh, they, they can make the, the, the trade offs and that they kind of understand the effort involved too. So, you know, bringing them into this continuous again, kind of this continuous development process, um, to make sure that things are better aligned and really better prioritize. Cause ultimately, you know, we don't live in an infinite resources situation and people got to make trade offs. They got to make decisions as to what goes and what doesn't go in for everything that goes. Right. I always say you pick one thing. Okay. That's 99 other things that couldn't go. So it's really important to have, you know, this, you said alignment of the business priorities as well as, you know, the execution within, within the development. >>Yeah. I think that, you know, uh, you know, I think it was probably close to two years ago. Forester started talking about the age of the customer, right. That, that was like their big theme at the time. Right. And I think to me what that, the age of the customer actually translates to and Mick, Mick and I are both big fans of this whole idea of the project and product shift, mixed book, you know, it was a great piece on a, you're talking about, you know, as part of the manifesto is one of the authors as well, but this shift from project to product, right? Like the age of the customer, in my opinion, the, the embodiment of that is the shift to a product mentality. Right. And, and the product mentality in my opinion, is what brings the business and technology teams together, right? >>Once you, once you're focused on a customer experience is delivered through a product or a service. That's when I that's, when I started to go with the alignment problem goes away, right. Because if you look at software companies, right, I mean, we run product management models yeah. With software development teams, customer success teams, right. That, you know, the software component of these products that people are building is obviously becoming bigger and bigger, you know, in an, in many ways, right. More and more organizations are trying to model themselves over as operationally like software companies. Right. Um, they obviously have lots of other components in their business than just software, but I think that whole model of customer experience equaling product, and then the software component of product, the product is the essence of what changes that alignment equation and brings business and teams together because all of a sudden, everyone knows what the customer's experiencing. Right. And, and that, that, that makes a lot of things very clear, very quickly. >>Right. I'm just curious how far along this was as a process before, before COBIT hit, right. Because serendipitous, whatever. Right. But the sudden, you know, light switch moment, everybody had to go work from home and in March 15th compared to now we're in October and this is going to be going on for a while. And it is a new normal and whatever that whatever's going to look like a year from now, or two years from now is TBD, you know, had you guys already started on this journey cause again, to sit down and actually declare this coalition and declare this manifesto is a lot different than just trying to do better within your own organization. >>Yeah. So we had started, uh, you know, w we definitely had started independently, you know, some, some, you know, I think people in the community know that, uh, we, we came together with a company called lean kit a handful of years ago, and I give John Terry actually one of the founders LeanKit immense credit for, you know, kind of spearheading our cultural change and not, and not because of, we were just gonna be, you know, bringing agile solutions to our customers, but because, you know, he believed that it was going to be a fundamentally better way for us to work. Right. And we kind of, you know, we started with John and built, you know, out of concentric circles of momentum and, and we've gotten to the place where now it's just part of who we are, but, but I do think that, you know, COVID has, you know, um, I think pre COVID a lot of companies, you know, would, would adopt, you know, the would adopt digital slash agile transformation. >>Um, traditional industries may have done it as a reaction to disruption. Right. You know, and in many cases, the disruption to these traditional industries was, I would say a product oriented company, right. That probably had a larger software component, and that disruption caused a competitive issue, uh, or a customer issue that caused companies and tried to respond by transforming. I think COVID, you know, all of a sudden flatten that out, right. We literally all got disrupted. Right. And so all of a sudden, every one of us is dealing with some degree of market uncertainty, customer uncertainty, uh, and also, you know, none of us were insulated from the need to be able to pivot faster, deliver incrementally, you know, and operate in a different, completely more agile way, uh, you know, post COVID. Right. Yeah. That's great. >>So again, a very, very, very timely, you know, a little bit of serendipity, a little bit of planning. And, you know, as, as with all important things, there's always a little bit of lock in, uh, and a lot of hard work involved. So a really interesting thank you for, for your leadership, Patrick. And, you know, it really makes a statement. I think when you have a bunch of leaderships across an industry coming together and putting their name on a piece of paper, uh, that's aligned around us some principles and some values, which again, if you read them who wouldn't want to get behind these, but if it takes, you know, something a little bit more formal, uh, to kind of move the ball down the field, and then I totally get it and a really great work. Thanks for, uh, thanks for doing it. >>Oh, absolutely. No. Like I said, the first time I read it, I was like, yep. Like you said, this is all, it's all makes complete sense, but just documenting it and saying it and talking about it moves the needle. I'll tell you as a company, you gotta, we're pushing really hard on, uh, you know, on our own internal strategy on diversity and inclusion. Right. And, and like, once we wrote the words down about what, you know, what we aspire to be from a diversity and inclusion perspective, it's the same thing. Everybody reads the words that goes, why wouldn't we do this? Right. But until you write it down and kind of have again, a manifesto or a Terra firma of what you're trying to accomplish, you know, then you can rally behind it. Right. As opposed to it being something that's, everybody's got their own version of the flavor. Right. And I think it's a very analogous, you know, kind of, uh, initiative. Right. And, uh, and it's happening, both of those things right. Are happening across the industry these days. Right. >>And measure it too. Right. And measure it, measure, measure, measure, get a baseline. Even if you don't like to measure, even if you don't like what the, even if you can argue against the math, behind the measurement, measure it. And at least you can measure it again and you can, and you've got some type of a comp and that is really the only way to, to move it forward. We're Patrick really enjoyed the conversation. Thanks for, uh, for taking a few minutes out of your day. >>It's great to be here. It's an awesome movement and we're glad to be a part of it. >>All right. Thanks. And if you want to check out the biz ops, Manifesta go to biz ops, manifesto.org, read it. You might want to sign it. It's there for you. And thanks for tuning in on this segment will continuing coverage of the biz op manifesto unveil you're on the cube. I'm Jeff, thanks for watching >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. >>Hey, welcome back, everybody Jeffrey here with the cube. We're coming to you from our Palo Alto studios. And welcome back to this event is the biz ops manifesto unveiling. So the biz ops manifesto and the biz ops coalition had been around for a little while, but today's the big day. That's kind of the big public unveiling, or we're excited to have some of the foundational people that, you know, have put their, put their name on the dotted, if you will, to support this initiative and talk about why that initiative is so important. And so the next guest we're excited to have is dr. Mick Kirsten. He is the founder and CEO of Tasktop mic. Great to see you coming in from Vancouver, Canada, I think, right? Yes. Great to be here, Jeff. Thank you. Absolutely. I hope your air is a little better out there. I know you had some of the worst air of all of us, a couple, a couple of weeks back. So hopefully things are, uh, are getting a little better and we get those fires under control. Yeah. >>Things have cleared up now. So yeah, it's good. It's good to be close to the U S and it's going to have the Arabic cleaner as well. >>Absolutely. So let's, let's jump into it. So you you've been an innovation guy forever starting way back in the day and Xerox park. I was so excited to do an event at Xerox park for the first time last year. I mean, that, that to me represents along with bell labs and, and some other, you know, kind of foundational innovation and technology centers, that's gotta be one of the greatest ones. So I just wonder if you could share some perspective of getting your start there at Xerox park, you know, some of the lessons you learned and what you've been able to kind of carry forward from those days. >>Yeah. I was fortunate to join Xerox park in the computer science lab there at a fairly early point in my career, and to be working on open source programming languages. So back then in the computer science lab, where some of the inventions around programming around software development games, such as object programming, and a lot of what we had around really modern programming levels constructs, those were the teams I had the fortunate of working with, and really our goal was. And of course, there's, as, as you noticed, there's just this DNA of innovation and excitement and innovation in the water. And really it was the model that was all about changing the way that we work was looking at for how we can make it 10 times easier to white coat. But this is back in 99. And we were looking at new ways of expressing, especially business concerns, especially ways of enabling people who are wanting to innovate for their business to express those concerns in code and make that 10 times easier than what that would take. >>So we create a new open source programming language, and we saw some benefits, but not quite quite what we expected. I then went and actually joined Charles Stephanie, that former to fucking from Microsoft who was responsible for, he actually got Microsoft word as a sparking into Microsoft and into the hands of bill Gates and that company that was behind the whole office suite and his vision. And then when I was trying to execute with, working for him was to make PowerPoint like a programming language to make everything completely visual. And I realized none of this was really working, that there was something else, fundamentally wrong programming languages, or new ways of building software. Like let's try and do with Charles around intentional programming. That was not enough. >>That was not enough. So, you know, the agile movement got started about 20 years ago, and we've seen the rise of dev ops and really this kind of embracing of, of, of sprints and, you know, getting away from MRDs and PRDs and these massive definitions of what we're going to build and long build cycles to this iterative process. And this has been going on for a little while. So what was still wrong? What was still missing? Why the biz ops coalition, why the biz ops manifesto? >>Yeah, so I basically think we nailed some of the things that the program language levels of teams can have effective languages deployed to soften to the cloud easily now, right? And at the kind of process and collaboration and planning level agile two decades, decades ago was formed. We were adopting and all the, all the teams I was involved with and it's really become a self problem. So agile tools, agile teams, agile ways of planning, uh, are now very mature. And the whole challenge is when organizations try to scale that. And so what I realized is that the way that agile was scaling across teams and really scaling from the technology part of the organization to the business was just completely flawed. The agile teams had one set of doing things, one set of metrics, one set of tools. And the way that the business was working was planning was investing in technology was just completely disconnected and using a whole different set of measures. Pretty >>Interesting. Cause I think it's pretty clear from the software development teams in terms of what they're trying to deliver. Cause they've got a feature set, right. And they've got bugs and it's easy to, it's easy to see what they deliver, but it sounds like what you're really honing in on is this disconnect on the business side, in terms of, you know, is it the right investment? You know, are we getting the right business ROI on this investment? Was that the right feature? Should we be building another feature or should we building a completely different product set? So it sounds like it's really a core piece of this is to get the right measurement tools, the right measurement data sets so that you can make the right decisions in terms of what you're investing, you know, limited resources. You can't, nobody has unlimited resources. And ultimately you have to decide what to do, which means you're also deciding what not to do. And it sounds like that's a really big piece of this, of this whole effort. >>Yeah. Jeff, that's exactly it, which is the way that the agile team measures their own way of working is very different from the way that you measure business outcomes. The business outcomes are in terms of how happy your customers are, but are you innovating fast enough to keep up with the pace of a rapidly changing economy, roughly changing market. And those are, those are all around the customer. And so what I learned on this long journey of supporting many organizations transformations and having them try to apply those principles of agile and dev ops, that those are not enough, those measures technical practices, uh, those measured sort of technical excellence of bringing code to the market. They don't actually measure business outcomes. And so I realized that it really was much more around having these entwined flow metrics that are customer centric and business centric and market centric where we need it to go. Right. >>So I want to shift gears a little bit and talk about your book because you're also a bestselling author from project to product and, and, and you, you brought up this concept in your book called the flow framework. And it's really interesting to me cause I know, you know, flow on one hand is kind of a workflow and a process flow and, and you know, that's how things get done and, and, and embrace the flow. On the other hand, you know, everyone now in, in a little higher level existential way is trying to get into the flow right into the workflow and, you know, not be interrupted and get into a state where you're kind of at your highest productivity, you know, kind of your highest comfort, which flow are you talking about in your book? Or is it a little bit of both? >>That's a great question. It's not one I get asked very often cause to me it's absolutely both. So that the thing that we want to get, that we've learned how to master individual flow, that there's this beautiful book by me, how you teaches me how he does a beautiful Ted talk by him as well about how we can take control of our own flow. So my question with the book with question replies, how can we bring that to entire teams and really entire organizations? How can we have everyone contributing to a customer outcome? And this is really what if you go to the biz ops manifesto, it says, I focus on outcomes on using data to drive whether we're delivering those outcomes rather than a focus on proxy metrics, such as, how quickly did we implement this feature? No, it's really how much value did the customer go to the future? >>And how quickly did you learn and how quickly did you use that data to drive to that next outcome? Really that with companies like Netflix and Amazon have mastered, how do we get that to every large organization, every it organization and make everyone be a software innovator. So it's to bring that, that concept of flow to these end to end value streams. And the fascinating thing is we've actually seen the data. We've been able to study a lot of value streams. We see when flow increases, when organizations deliver value to a customer faster, developers actually become more happy. So things like that and point out promoter scores, rise, and we've got empirical data for this. So that the beautiful thing to me is that we've actually been able to combine these two things and see the results and the data that you increase flow to the customer. Your developers are more, >>I love it. I love it, right, because we're all more, we're all happier when we're in the flow and we're all more productive when we're in the flow. So I, that is a great melding of, of two concepts, but let's jump into the, into the manifesto itself a little bit. And you know, I love that you took this approach really of having kind of four key values and then he gets 12 key principles. And I just want to read a couple of these values because when you read them, it sounds pretty brain dead. Right? Of course. Right. Of course you should focus on business outcomes. Of course you should have trust and collaboration. Of course you should have database decision making processes and not just intuition or, you know, whoever's the loudest person in the room, uh, and to learn and respond and pivot. But what's the value of actually just putting them on a piece of paper, because again, this is not this, these are all good, positive things, right? When somebody reads these to you or tells you these are sticks it on the wall, of course. But unfortunately of course isn't always enough. >>No. And I think what's happened is some of these core principles originally from the agile manifesto in two decades ago, uh, the whole dev ops movement of the last decade of flow feedback and continue learning has been key. But a lot of organizations, especially the ones undergoing digital transformations have actually gone a very different way, right? The way that they measure value, uh, in technology and innovation is through costs for many organizations. The way that they actually are looking at that they're moving to cloud is actually as a reduction in cost. Whereas the right way of looking at moving to cloud is how much more quickly can we get to the value to the customer? How quickly can we learn from that? And how quickly can we drive the next business outcome? So really the key thing is, is to move away from those old ways of doing things of funding projects and cost centers, to actually funding and investing in outcomes and measuring outcomes through these flow metrics, which in the end are your fast feedback and how quickly you're innovating for your customer. >>So these things do seem very obvious when you look at them. But the key thing is what you need to stop doing to focus on these. You need to actually have accurate realtime data of how much value you fund to the customer every week, every month, every quarter. And if you don't have that, your decisions are not driven on data. If you don't know what your bottleneck is. And this is something that in decades of manufacturing, a car manufacturers, other manufacturers, master, they always know where the bottom back in their production processes. You ask a random CIO when a global 500 company where their bottleneck is, and you won't get a clear answer because there's not that level of understanding. So have to actually follow these principles. You need to know exactly where you fall. And I guess because that's, what's making your developers miserable and frustrated, then having them context, which I'm trash. So the approach here is important and we have to stop doing these other things, >>Right? There's so much there to unpack. I love it. You know, especially the cloud conversation because so many people look at it wrong as, as, as a cost saving a device, as opposed to an innovation driver and they get stuck, they get stuck in the literal. And I, you know, I think at the same thing, always about Moore's law, right? You know, there's a lot of interesting real tech around Moore's law and the increasing power of microprocessors, but the real power, I think in Moore's laws is the attitudinal change in terms of working in a world where you know that you've got all this power and what you build and design. I think it's funny to your, your comment on the flow and the bottleneck, right? Cause, cause we know manufacturing, as soon as you fix one bottleneck, you move to your next one, right? You always move to your next point of failure. So if you're not fixing those things, you know, you're not, you're not increasing that speed down the line, unless you can identify where that bottleneck is or no matter how many improvements you make to the rest of the process, it's still going to get hung up on that one spot. >>That's exactly it. And you also make it sound so simple, but again, if you don't have the data driven visibility of where the bottom line is, and these bottlenecks are adjusted to say, it's just whack-a-mole right. So we need to understand is the bottleneck because our security reviews are taking too long and stopping us from getting value for the customer. If it's that automate that process. And then you move on to the next bottleneck, which might actually be that deploying yourself into the cloud was taking too long. But if you don't take that approach of going flow first, rather than again, that sort of cost reduction. First, you have to think of that approach of customer centricity and you only focused on optimizing costs. Your costs will increase and your flow will slow down. And this is just one of these fascinating things. Whereas if you focus on getting back to the customer and reducing your cycles on getting value, your flow time from six months to two weeks or two, one week or two event, as we see with, with tech giants, you actually can both lower your costs and get much more value that for us to get that learning loop going. >>So I think I've seen all of these cloud deployments and one of the things that's happened that delivered almost no value because there was such big bottlenecks upfront in the process and actually the hosting and the AP testing was not even possible with all of those inefficiencies. So that's why going float for us rather than costs where we started our project versus silky. >>I love that. And, and, and, and it, it begs repeating to that right within the subscription economy, you know, you're on the hook to deliver value every single month because they're paying you every single month. So if you're not on top of how you're delivering value, you're going to get sideways because it's not like, you know, they pay a big down payment and a small maintenance fee every month, but once you're in a subscription relationship, you know, you have to constantly be delivering value and upgrading that value because you're constantly taking money from the customer. So it's such a different kind of relationship than kind of the classic, you know, big bang with a maintenance agreement on the back end really important. Yeah. >>And I think in terms of industry shifts that that's it that's, what's catalyzed. This interesting shift is in this SAS and subscription economy. If you're not delivering more and more value to your customers, someone else's and they're winning the business, not you. So one way we know is to delight our customers with great user experiences. Well, that really is based on how many features you delivered or how much, how big, how many quality improvements or scalar performance improvements you delivered. So the problem is, and this is what the business manifesto, as well as the full frame of touch on is if you can't measure how much value you delivered to a customer, what are you measuring? You just backed again, measuring costs and that's not a measure of value. So we have to shift quickly away from measuring cost to measuring value, to survive in the subscription economy. >>We could go for days and days and days. I want to shift gears a little bit into data and, and, and a data driven, um, decision making a data driven organization cause right day has been talked about for a long time, the huge big data meme with, with Hadoop over, over several years and, and data warehouses and data lakes and data oceans and data swamps, and can go on and on and on. It's not that easy to do, right? And at the same time, the proliferation of data is growing exponentially. We're just around the corner from, from IOT and 5g. So now the accumulation of data at machine scale, again, this is going to overwhelm and one of the really interesting principles, uh, that I wanted to call out and get your take right, is today's organizations generate more data than humans can process. So informed decisions must be augmented by machine learning and artificial intelligence. I wonder if you can, again, you've got some great historical perspective, um, reflect on how hard it is to get the right data, to get the data in the right context, and then to deliver it to the decision makers and then trust the decision makers to actually make the data and move that down. You know, it's kind of this democratization process into more and more people and more and more frontline jobs making more and more of these little decisions every day. >>Yeah. I definitely think the front parts of what you said are where the promises of big data have completely fallen on their face into the swamps as, as you mentioned, because if you don't have the data in the right format, you've cannot connect collected at the right way. You want that way, the right way you can't use human or machine learning effectively. And there've been the number of data warehouses in a typical enterprise organization. And the sheer investment is tremendous, but the amount of intelligence being extracted from those is, is, is a very big problem. So the key thing that I've noticed is that if you can model your value streams, so yes, you understand how you're innovating, how you're measuring the delivery of value and how long that takes. What is your time to value these metrics like full time? You can actually use both the intelligence that you've got around the table and push that down as well, as far as getting to the organization, but you can actually start using that those models to understand and find patterns and detect bottlenecks that might be surprising, right? >>Well, you can detect interesting bottlenecks when you shift to work from home. We detected all sorts of interesting bottlenecks in our own organization that were not intuitive to me that had to do with, you know, more senior people being overloaded and creating bottlenecks where they didn't exist. Whereas we thought we were actually an organization that was very good at working from home because of our open source roots. So that data is highly complex. Software value streams are extremely complicated. And the only way to really get the proper analyst and data is to model it properly and then to leverage these machine learning and AI techniques that we have. But that front part of what you said is where organizations are just extremely immature in what I've seen, where they've got data from all their tools, but not modeled in the right way. Right, right. >>Right. Well, all right. So before I let you go, you know, let's say you get a business leader, he buys in, he reads the manifesto, he signs on the dotted line and he says, Mick, how do I get started? I want to be more aligned with, with the development teams. You know, I'm in a very competitive space. We need to be putting out new software features and engaging with our customers. I want to be more data-driven how do I get started? Well, you know, what's the biggest inhibitor for most people to get started and get some early wins, which we know is always the key to success in any kind of a new initiative. >>Right? So I think you can reach out to us through the website, uh, there's the manifesto, but the key thing is just to get you set up it's to get started and to get the key wins. So take a probably value stream that's mission critical. It could be your new mobile and web experiences or, or part of your cloud modernization platform or your analytics pipeline, but take that and actually apply these principles to it and measure the end to end flow of value. Make sure you have a value metric that everyone is on the same page on the people, on the development teams, the people in leadership all the way up to the CEO. And one of the, what I encourage you to start is actually that content flow time, right? That is the number one metric. That is how you measure it, whether you're getting the benefit of your cloud modernization, that is the one metric that Adrian Cockcroft. When the people I respect tremendously put into his cloud for CEOs, the metric, the one, the one way to measure innovation. So basically take these principles, deploy them on one product value stream, measure, sentiment, flow time, and then you'll actually be well on your path to transforming and to applying the concepts of agile and dev ops all the way to, to the business, to the way >>You're offering model. >>Well, Mick really great tips, really fun to catch up. I look forward to a time when we can actually sit across the table and, and get into this. Cause I just, I just love the perspective and, you know, you're very fortunate to have that foundational, that foundational base coming from Xerox park and they get, you know, it's, it's a very magical place with a magical history. So to, to incorporate that into, continue to spread that well, uh, you know, good for you through the book and through your company. So thanks for sharing your insight with us today. >>Thanks so much for having me, Jeff. >>All right. And go to the biz ops manifesto.org, read it, check it out. If you want to sign it, sign it. They'd love to have you do it. Stay with us for continuing coverage of the unveiling of the business manifesto on the cube. I'm Jeff. Rick. Thanks for watching. See you next time >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. >>Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with the cube come due from our Palo Alto studios today for a big, big reveal. We're excited to be here. It's the biz ops manifesto unveiling a thing's been in the works for awhile and we're excited to have our next guest. One of the, really the powers behind this whole effort. And he's joining us from Boston it's surge, Lucio, the vice president, and general manager enterprise software division at Broadcom surge. Great to see you. >>Hi, good to see you, Jeff. Glad to be here. >>So you've been in this business for a very long time. You've seen a lot of changes in technology. What is the biz ops manifesto? What is this coalition all about? Why do we need this today and in 2020? >>Yeah. So, so I've been in this business for close to 25 years, right? So about 20 years ago, the agile manifesto was created. And the goal of the agile manifesto was really to address the uncertainty around software development and the inability to predict the efforts to build software. And, uh, if you, if you roll that kind of 20 years later, and if you look at the current state of the industry, uh, the product, the project management Institute, estimates that we're wasting about a million dollars, every 20 seconds in digital transformation initiatives that do not deliver on business results. In fact, we were recently served a third of the, uh, a number of executives in partnership with Harvard business review and 77% of those executives think that one of the key challenges that they have is really at the collaboration between business and it, and that that's been kind of a case for, uh, almost 20 years now. >>Um, so the, the, the key challenge we're faced with is really that we need a new approach and many of the players in the industry, including ourselves, I've been using different terms, right? Some are being, are talking about value stream management. Some are talking about software delivery management. If you look at the site, reliability engineering movement, in many ways, it embodies a lot of these kind of concepts and principles. So we believed that it became really imperative for us to crystallize around, could have one concept. And so in many ways, the, uh, the BizOps concept and the business manifesto are bringing together a number of ideas, which have been emerging in the last five years or so, and, and defining the key values and principles to finally help these organizations truly transform and become digital businesses. And so the hope is that by joining our forces and defining public key principles and values, we can help the industry, uh, not just, uh, by, you know, providing them with support, but also, uh, tools and consulting that is required for them to truly achieve the kind of transformation that everybody's seeking. >>Right, right. So COVID now we're six months into it, approximately seven months into it. Um, a lot of pain, a lot of bad stuff still happening. We've got a ways to go, but one of the things that on the positive side, right, and you've seen all the memes and social media is, is a driver of digital transformation and a driver of change. Cause we had this light switch moment in the middle of March and there was no more planning. There was no more conversation. You've suddenly got remote workforces, everybody's working from home and you got to go, right. So the reliance on these tools increases dramatically, but I'm curious, you know, kind of short of, of the beginnings of this effort in short of kind of COVID, which, you know, came along unexpectedly. I mean, what were those inhibitors because we've been making software for a very long time, right? The software development community has, has adopted kind of rapid change and, and iterative, uh, delivery and, and sprints, what was holding back the connection with the business side to make sure that those investments were properly aligned with outcomes. >>Well, so, so you have to understand that it is, is kind of a its own silos. And traditionally it has been treated as a cost center within large organizations and not as a value center. And so as a result could have a traditional dynamic between it and the business is basically one of a kind of supplier up to kind of a business. Um, and you know, if you, if you go back to, uh, I think you'll unmask a few years ago, um, basically at this concept of the machines to build the machines and you went as far as saying that, uh, the machines or the production line is actually the product. So, um, meaning that the core of the innovation is really about, uh, building, could it be engine to deliver on the value? And so in many ways, you know, we have missed on this shift from, um, kind of it becoming this kind of value center within the enterprises. >>And, and he talks about culture. Now, culture is a, is a sum total of beavers. And the reality is that if you look at it, especially in the last decade, uh, we've agile with dev ops with, um, I bring infrastructures, uh, it's, it's way more volatile today than it was 10 years ago. And so the, when you start to look at the velocity of the data, the volume of data, the variety of data to analyze this system, um, it's, it's very challenging for it to actually even understand and optimize its own processes, let alone, um, to actually include business as sort of an integral part of kind of a delivery chain. And so it's both kind of a combination of, of culture, um, which is required as well as tools, right? To be able to start to bring together all these data together, and then given the volume variety of philosophy of the data, uh, we have to apply some core technologies, which have only really, truly emerged in the last five to 10 years around machine learning and analytics. And so it's really kind of a combination of those freaks, which are coming together today to really help organizations kind of get to the next level. Right, >>Right. So let's talk about the manifesto. Let's talk about, uh, the coalition, uh, the BizOps coalition. I just liked that you put down these really simple, you know, kind of straightforward core values. You guys have four core values that you're highlighting, you know, business outcomes, over individual projects and outputs, trust, and collaboration, oversight, load teams, and organizations, data driven decisions, what you just talked about, uh, you know, over opinions and judgment and learned, respond and pivot. I mean, surgery sounds like pretty basic stuff, right? I mean, aren't, isn't everyone working to these values already. And I think he touched on it on culture, right? Trust and collaboration, data driven decisions. I mean, these are fundamental ways that people must run their business today, or the person that's across the street, that's doing it. It's going to knock them out right off their blog. >>Yeah. So that's very true. But, uh, so I'll, I'll mention in our survey, we did, uh, I think about six months ago and it was in partnership with, uh, with, uh, an industry analyst and we serve at a, again, a number of it executives to understand how many we're tracking business outcomes I'm going to do with the software executives. It executives we're tracking business outcomes. And the, there were less than 15% of these executives were actually tracking the outcomes of a software delivery. And you see that every day. Right? So in my own teams, for instance, we've been adopting a lot of these core principles in the last year or so, and we've uncovered that 16% of our resources were basically aligned around initiatives, which are not strategic for us. Um, I take, you know, another example, for instance, one of our customers in the, uh, in the airline industry and Harvard, for instance, that a number of, uh, um, that they had software issues that led to people searching for flights and not returning any kind of availability. >>And yet, um, you know, the, it teams, whether it's operations, software environments were completely oblivious to that because they were completely blindsided to it. And so the connectivity between kind of the inwards metrics that RT is using, whether it's database time, cycle time, or whatever metric we use in it are typically completely divorced from the business metrics. And so at its core, it's really about starting to align the business metrics with what the, the software delivery chain, right? This, uh, the system, which is really a core differentiator for these organizations. It's about connecting those two things and, and starting to, um, infuse some of the agile culture and principles. Um, that's emerged from the software side into the business side. Um, of course the lean movement and other movements have started to change some of these dynamic on the, on the business side. And so I think this, this is the moment where we are starting to see kind of the imperative to transform. Now, you know, Covina obviously has been a key driver for that. The, um, the technology is right to start to be able to weave data together and really kind of, uh, also the cultural shifts, uh, Prue agile through dev ops through, uh, the SRE movement, uh frulein um, business transformation, all these things are coming together and that are really creating kind of the conditions for the BizOps manifesto to exist. >>So, uh, Clayton Christianson, great, uh, Harvard professor innovator's dilemma might still my all time favorite business books, you know, talks about how difficult it is for incumbents to react to, to disruptive change, right? Because they're always working on incremental change because that's what their customers are asking for. And there's a good ROI when you talk about, you know, companies not measuring the right thing. I mean, clearly it has some portion of their budget that has to go to keeping the lights on, right. That that's always the case, but hopefully that's an, an ever decreasing percentage of their total activity. So, you know, what should people be measuring? I mean, what are kind of the new metrics, um, in, in biz ops that drive people to be looking at the right things, measuring the right things and subsequently making the right decisions, investment decisions on whether they should do, you know, move project a along or project B. >>So there, there are only two things, right? So, so I think what you're talking about is portfolio management, investment management, right. And, um, which, which is a key challenge, right? Um, in my own experience, right? Uh, driving strategy or a large scale kind of software organization for years, um, it's very difficult to even get kind of a base data as to who is doing what, uh, um, I mean, some of our largest customers we're engaged with right now are simply trying to get a very simple answer, which is how many people do I have and that specific initiative at any point in time, and just tracking that information is extremely difficult. So, and again, back to a product project management Institute, um, there, they have estimated that on average, it organizations have anywhere between 10 to 20% of their resources focused on initiatives, which are not strategically aligned. >>So, so that's one dimensional portfolio management. I think the key aspect though, that we are, we're really keen on is really around kind of the alignment of a business metrics to the it metrics. Um, so I'll use kind of two simple examples, right? And my background is around quality and I've always believed that the fitness for purpose is really kind of a key, um, uh, philosophy if you will. And so if you start to think about quality as fitness for purpose, you start to look at it from a customer point of view, right. And fitness for purpose for a core banking application or mobile application are different, right? So the definition of a business value that you're trying to achieve is different. Um, and so the, and yeah, if you look at our, it, operations are operating there, we're using kind of a same type of, uh, kind of inward metrics, uh, like a database off time or a cycle time, or what is my point of velocity, right? >>And so the challenge really is this inward facing metrics that it is using, which are divorced from ultimately the outcome. And so, you know, if I'm, if I'm trying to build a poor banking application, my core metric is likely going to be uptight, right? If I'm trying to build a mobile application or maybe your social, a mobile app, it's probably going to be engagement. And so what you want is for everybody across it, to look at these metric and what are the metrics within the software delivery chain, which ultimately contribute to that business metric. And some cases cycle time may be completely irrelevant, right? Again, my core banking app, maybe I don't care about cycle time. And so it's really about aligning those metrics and be able to start to, um, Charles you mentioned, uh, around the, the, um, uh, around the disruption that we see is, or the investors is the dilemma now is really around the fact that many it organizations are essentially applying the same approaches of, for innovation, like for basically scrap work, then they would apply to kind of over more traditional projects. And so, you know, there's been a lot of talk about two-speed it, and yes, it exists, but in reality are really organizations, um, truly differentiating, um, all of the operate, their, their projects and products based on the outcomes that they're trying to achieve. And this is really where BizOps is trying to affect. >>I love that, you know, again, it doesn't seem like brain surgery, but focus on the outcomes, right. And it's horses for courses, as you said, this project, you know, what you're measuring and how you define success, isn't necessarily the same as, as on this other project. So let's talk about some of the principles we talked about the values, but, you know, I think it's interesting that, that, that the BizOps coalition, you know, just basically took the time to write these things down and they don't seem all that super insightful, but I guess you just got to get them down and have them on paper and have them in front of your face. But I want to talk about, you know, one of the key ones, which you just talked about, which is changing requirements, right. And working in a dynamic situation, which is really what's driven, you know, this, the software to change in software development, because, you know, if you're in a game app and your competitor comes out with a new blue sword, you got to come out with a new blue sword. >>So whether you had that on your Kanban wall or not. So it's, it's really this embracing of the speed of change and, and, and, and making that, you know, the rule, not the exception. I think that's a phenomenal one. And the other one you talked about is data, right? And that today's organizations generate more data than humans can process. So informed decisions must be generated by machine learning and AI, and, you know, in the, the big data thing with Hadoop, you know, started years ago, but we are seeing more and more that people are finally figuring it out, that it's not just big data, and it's not even generic machine learning or artificial intelligence, but it's applying those particular data sets and that particular types of algorithms to a specific problem, to your point, to try to actually reach an objective, whether that's, you know, increasing the, your average ticket or, you know, increasing your checkout rate with, with, with shopping carts that don't get left behind in these types of things. So it's a really different way to think about the world in the good old days, probably when you got started, when we had big, giant, you know, MRDs and PRDs and sat down and coded for two years and came out with a product release and hopefully not too many patches subsequently to that. >>It's interesting. Right. Um, again, back to one of these surveys that we did with, uh, with about 600, the ITA executives, and, uh, and, and we, we purposely designed those questions to be pretty open. Um, and, and one of them was really wrong requirements and, uh, and it was really a wrong, uh, kind of what do you, what is the best approach? What is your preferred approach towards requirements? And if I were to remember correctly, over 80% of the it executives set that the best approach they'll prefer to approach these core requirements to be completely defined before software development starts, let me pause there we're 20 years after the agile manifesto, right? And for 80% of these idea executives to basically claim that the best approach is for requirements to be fully baked before salt, before software development starts, basically shows that we still have a very major issue. >>And again, our hypothesis in working with many organizations is that the key challenge is really the boundary between business and it, which is still very much contract based. If you look at the business side, they basically are expecting for it deliver on time on budget, right. But what is the incentive for it to actually delivering on the business outcomes, right? How often is it measured on the business outcomes and not on an SLA or on a budget type criteria? And so that's really the fundamental shift that we need to, we really need to drive up as an industry. Um, and you know, we, we talk about kind of this, this imperative for organizations to operate that's one, and back to the, the, um, you know, various Doris dilemna the key difference between these larger organization is, is really kind of, uh, if you look at the amount of capital investment that they can put into pretty much anything, why are they losing compared to, um, you know, startups? What, why is it that, uh, more than 40% of, uh, personal loans today or issued not by your traditional brick and mortar banks, but by, um, startups? Well, the reason, yes, it's the traditional culture of doing incremental changes and not disrupting ourselves, which Christiansen covered the length, but it's also the inability to really fundamentally change kind of a dynamic picture. We can business it and, and, and partner right. To, to deliver on a specific business outcome. >>All right. I love that. That's a great, that's a great summary. And in fact, getting ready for this interview, I saw you mentioning another thing where, you know, the, the problem with the agile development is that you're actually now getting more silos. Cause you have all these autonomous people working, you know, kind of independently. So it's even a harder challenge for, for the business leaders to, to, as you said, to know, what's actually going on, but, but certainly I w I want to close, um, and talk about the coalition. Um, so clearly these are all great concepts. These are concepts you want to apply to your business every day. Why the coalition, why, you know, take these concepts out to a broader audience, including either your, your competition and the broader industry to say, Hey, we, as a group need to put a stamp of approval on these concepts, these values, these principles. >>So first I think we, we want, um, everybody to realize that we are all talking about the same things, the same concepts. I think we were all from our own different vantage point, realizing that things after change, and again, back to, you know, whether it's value stream management or site reliability engineering, or biz ops, we're all kind of using slightly different languages. Um, and so I think one of the important aspects of BizOps is for us, all of us, whether we're talking about, you know, consulting agile transformation experts, uh, whether we're talking about vendors, right, provides kind of tools and technologies or these large enterprises to transform for all of us to basically have kind of a reference that lets us speak around kind of, um, in a much more consistent way. The second aspect is for, to me is for, um, DS concepts to start to be embraced, not just by us or trying, or, you know, vendors, um, system integrators, consulting firms, educators, thought leaders, but also for some of our old customers to start to become evangelists of their own in the industry. >>So we, our, our objective with the coalition needs to be pretty, pretty broad. Um, and our hope is by, by starting to basically educate, um, our, our joint customers or partners, that we can start to really foster these behaviors and start to really change some of dynamics. So we're very pleased at if you look at, uh, some of the companies which have joined the, the, the, the manifesto. Um, so we have vendors such as desktop or advance, or, um, uh, PagerDuty for instance, or even planned view, uh, one of my direct competitors, um, but also thought leaders like Tom Davenport or, uh, or cap Gemini or, um, um, smaller firms like, uh, business agility, institutes, or agility elf. Um, and so our goal really is to start to bring together, uh, fall years, people would have been LP, large organizations, do digital transformation vendors. We're providing the technologies that many of these organizations use to deliver on this digital preservation and for all of us to start to provide the kind of, uh, education support and tools that the industry needs. Yeah, >>That's great surge. And, uh, you know, congratulations to you and the team. I know this has been going on for a while, putting all this together, getting people to sign onto the manifesto, putting the coalition together, and finally today getting to unveil it to the world in, in a little bit more of a public, uh, opportunity. So again, you know, really good values, really simple principles, something that, that, uh, shouldn't have to be written down, but it's nice cause it is, and now you can print it out and stick it on your wall. So thank you for, uh, for sharing this story and again, congrats to you and the team. >>Thank you. Thanks, Jeff. Appreciate it. >>Oh, my pleasure. Alrighty, surge. If you want to learn more about the BizOps manifest to go to biz ops manifesto.org, read it and you can sign it and you can stay here for more coverage. I'm the cube of the biz ops manifesto unveiled. Thanks for watching. See you next >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of this ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by bill. >>Hey, welcome back, everybody Jeffrey here with the cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of the biz ops manifesto unveiling. It's been in the works for awhile, but today's the day that it actually kind of come out to the, to the public. And we're excited to have a real industry luminary here to talk about what's going on, why this is important and share his perspective. And we're happy to have from Cape Cod, I believe is Tom Davenport. He is a distinguished author and professor at Babson college. We could go on, he's got a lot of great titles and, and really illuminary in the area of big data and analytics Thomas. Great to see you. >>Thanks Jeff. Happy to be here with you. >>Great. So let's just jump into it, you know, and getting ready for this. I came across your LinkedIn posts. I think you did earlier this summer in June and right off the bat, the first sentence just grabbed my attention. I'm always interested in new attempts to address longterm issues, uh, in how technology works within businesses, biz ops. What did you see in biz ops, uh, that, that kind of addresses one of these really big longterm problems? >>Well, yeah, but the longterm problem is that we've had a poor connection between business people and it people between business objectives and the, it solutions that address them. This has been going on, I think since the beginning of information technology and sadly it hasn't gone away. And so biz ops is a new attempt to deal with that issue with, you know, a new framework, eventually a broad set of solutions that increase the likelihood that we'll actually solve a business problem with an it capability. >>Right. You know, it's interesting to compare it with like dev ops, which I think a lot of people are probably familiar with, which was, you know, built around, uh, agile software development and a theory that we want to embrace change that that changes. Okay. Uh, and we want to be able to iterate quickly and incorporate that. And that's been happening in the software world for, for 20 plus years. What's taken so long to get that to the business side, because as the pace of change has changed on the software side, you know, that's a strategic issue in terms of execution on the business side that they need now to change priorities. And, you know, there's no PRDs and MRDs and big, giant strategic plans that sit on the shelf for five years. That's just not the way business works anymore. It took a long time to get here. >>Yeah, it did. And you know, there have been previous attempts to make a better connection between business and it, there was the so called alignment framework that a couple of friends of mine from Boston university developed, I think more than 20 years ago, but you know, now we have better technology for creating that linkage. And the, you know, the idea of kind of ops oriented frameworks is pretty pervasive now. So I think it's time for another serious attempt at it. Right. >>And do you think doing it this way, right. With the, with the biz ops coalition, you know, getting a collection of, of, of kind of likeminded individuals and companies together, and actually even having a manifesto, which we're making this declarative statement of, of principles and values, you think that's what it takes to kind of drive this kind of beyond the experiment and actually, you know, get it done and really start to see some results in, in, uh, in production in the field. >>I think certainly, um, no one vendor organization can pull this off single handedly. It does require a number of organizations collaborating and working together. So I think our coalition is a good idea and a manifesto is just a good way to kind of lay out what you see as the key principles of the idea. And that makes it much easier for everybody to understand and act on. >>I think it's just, it's really interesting having, you know, having them written down on paper and having it just be so clearly articulated both in terms of the, of the values as well as, as the, uh, the principles and the values, you know, business outcomes matter trust and collaboration, data driven decisions, which is the number three or four, and then learn, respond and pivot. It doesn't seem like those should have to be spelled out so clearly, but, but obviously it helps to have them there. You can stick them on the wall and kind of remember what your priorities are, but you're the data guy. You're the analytics guy, uh, and a big piece of this is data and analytics and moving to data-driven decisions. And principle number seven says, you know, today's organizations generate more data than humans can process and informed decisions can be augmented by machine learning and artificial intelligence right up your alley. You know, you've talked a number of times on kind of the mini stages of analytics. Um, and how has that's evolved over, over time, you know, as you think of analytics and machine learning, driving decisions beyond supporting decisions, but actually starting to make decisions in machine time. What's that, what's that thing for you? What does that make you, you know, start to think, wow, this is, this is going to be pretty significant. >>Yeah. Well, you know, this has been a longterm interest of mine. Um, the last generation of AI, I was very interested in expert systems. And then, um, I think, uh, more than 10 years ago, I wrote an article about automated decision-making using what was available then, which was rule-based approaches. Um, but you know, this addresses an issue that we've always had with analytics and AI. Um, you know, we, we tended to refer to those things as providing decision support. The problem is that if the decision maker didn't want their support, didn't want to use them in order to make a decision, they didn't provide any value. And so the nice thing about automating decisions, um, with now contemporary AI tools is that we can ensure that data and analytics get brought into the decision without any possible disconnection. Now, I think humans still have something to add here, and we often will need to examine how that decision is being made and maybe even have the ability to override it. But in general, I think at least for, you know, repetitive tactical decisions, um, involving a lot of data, we want most of those, I think to be at least recommended if not totally made by an algorithm or an AI based system, and that I believe would add to the quality and the precision and the accuracy of decisions and in most organizations, >>No, I think, I think you just answered my next question before I, before Hey, asked it, you know, we had dr. Robert Gates on a former secretary of defense on a few years back, and we were talking about machines and machines making decisions. And he said at that time, you know, the only weapon systems, uh, that actually had an automated trigger on it were on the North Korea and South Korea border. Um, everything else, as you said, had to go through a sub person before the final decision was made. And my question is, you know, what are kind of the attributes of the decision that enable us to more easily automated? And then how do you see that kind of morphing over time, both as the data to support that as well as our comfort level, um, enables us to turn more and more actual decisions over to the machine? >>Well, yeah, it's suggested we need, um, data and, um, the data that we have to kind of train our models has to be high quality and current. And we, we need to know the outcomes of that data. You know, um, most machine learning models, at least in business are supervised. And that means we need to have labeled outcomes in the, in the training data. But I, you know, um, the pandemic that we're living through is a good illustration of the fact that, that the data also have to be reflective of current reality. And, you know, one of the things that we're finding out quite frequently these days is that, um, the data that we have do not reflect, you know, what it's like to do business in a pandemic. Um, I wrote a little piece about this recently with Jeff cam at wake forest university, we called it data science quarantined, and we interviewed with somebody who said, you know, it's amazing what eight weeks of zeros will do to your demand forecast. We just don't really know what happens in a pandemic. Um, our models maybe have to be put on the shelf for a little while and until we can develop some new ones or we can get some other guidelines into making decisions. So I think that's one of the key things with automated decision making. We have to make sure that the data from the past and that's all we have of course, is a good guide to, you know, what's happening in the present and the future as far as we understand it. Yeah. >>I used to joke when we started this calendar year 2020, it was finally the year that we know everything with the benefit of hindsight, but it turned out 20, 20 a year. We found out we actually know nothing and everything thought we knew, but I wanna, I wanna follow up on that because you know, it did suddenly change everything, right? We got this light switch moment. Everybody's working from home now we're many, many months into it, and it's going to continue for a while. I saw your interview with Bernard Marr and you had a really interesting comment that now we have to deal with this change. We don't have a lot of data and you talked about hold fold or double down. And, and I can't think of a more, you know, kind of appropriate metaphor for driving the value of the BizOps when now your whole portfolio strategy, um, these to really be questioned and, and, you know, you have to be really, uh, well, uh, executing on what you are, holding, what you're folding and what you're doubling down with this completely new environment. >>Well, yeah, and I hope I did this in the interview. I would like to say that I came up with that term, but it actually came from a friend of mine. Who's a senior executive at Genpact. And, um, I, um, used it mostly to talk about AI and AI applications, but I think you could, you could use it much more broadly to talk about your entire sort of portfolio of digital projects. You need to think about, well, um, given some constraints on resources and a difficult economy for a while, which of our projects do we want to keep going on pretty much the way we were and which ones are not that necessary anymore? You see a lot of that in AI, because we had so many pilots, somebody told me, you know, we've got more pilots around here than O'Hare airport and AI. Um, and then, but the ones that involve double down they're even more important to you. They are, you know, a lot of organizations have found this out in the pandemic, on digital projects. It's more and more important for customers to be able to interact with you, um, digitally. And so you certainly wouldn't want to, um, cancel those projects or put them on hold. So you double down on them and get them done faster and better. >>Right, right. Uh, another, another thing that came up in my research that you quoted, um, was, was from Jeff Bezos, talking about the great bulk of what we do is quietly, but meaningfully improving core operations. You know, I think that is so core to this concept of not AI and machine learning and kind of the general sense, which, which gets way too much buzz, but really applied right. Applied to a specific problem. And that's where you start to see the value. And, you know, the, the BizOps, uh, manifesto is, is, is calling it out in this particular process. But I'd love to get your perspective as you know, you speak generally about this topic all the time, but how people should really be thinking about where are the applications where I can apply this technology to get direct business value. >>Yeah, well, you know, even talking about automated decisions, um, uh, the kind of once in a lifetime decisions, uh, the ones that, um, ag Lafley, the former CEO of Procter and gamble used to call the big swing decisions. You only get a few of those. He said in your tenure as CEO, those are probably not going to be the ones that you're automating in part because, um, you don't have much data about them. You're only making them a few times and in part, because, um, they really require that big picture thinking and the ability to kind of anticipate the future, that the best human decision makers, um, have. Um, but, um, in general, I think where they are, the projects that are working well are, you know, when I call the low hanging fruit ones, the, some people even report to it referred to it as boring AI. >>So, you know, sucking data out of a contract in order to compare it to a bill of lading for what arrived at your supply chain companies can save or make a lot of money with that kind of comparison. It's not the most exciting thing, but AI, as you suggested is really good at those narrow kinds of tasks. It's not so good at the, at the really big moonshots, like curing cancer or, you know, figuring out well what's the best stock or bond under all circumstances or even autonomous vehicles. Um, we, we made some great progress in that area, but everybody seems to agree that they're not going to be perfect for quite a while. And we really don't want to be driving around on them very much unless they're, you know, good and all kinds of weather and with all kinds of pedestrian traffic and you know, that sort of thing, right? That's funny you bring up contract management. >>I had a buddy years ago, they had a startup around contract management and was like, and this was way before we had the compute power today and cloud proliferation. I said, you know, how, how can you possibly build software around contract management? It's language, it's legal, ease. It's very specific. And he's like, Jeff, we just need to know where's the contract. And when does it expire? And who's the signatory. And he built a business on those, you know, very simple little facts that weren't being covered because their contracts contractor in people's drawers and files and homes, and Lord only knows. So it's really interesting, as you said, these kind of low hanging fruit opportunities where you can extract a lot of business value without trying to, you know, boil the ocean. >>Yeah. I mean, if you're Amazon, um, uh, Jeff Bezos thinks it's important to have some kind of billion dollar projects. And he even says it's important to have a billion dollar failure or two every year. But I think most organizations probably are better off being a little less aggressive and, you know, sticking to, um, what AI has been doing for a long time, which is, you know, making smarter decisions based on, based on data. >>Right? So Tom, I want to shift gears one more time before, before we let you go on on kind of a new topic for you, not really new, but you know, not, not a, the vast majority of, of your publications and that's the new way to work, you know, as, as the pandemic hit in mid March, right. And we had this light switch moment, everybody had to work from home and it was, you know, kind of crisis and get everybody set up. Well, you know, now we're five months, six months, seven months. A number of companies have said that people are not going to be going back to work for a while. And so we're going to continue on this for a while. And then even when it's not what it is now, it's not going to be what it was before. So, you know, I wonder, and I know you, you, uh, you teased, you're working on a new book, you know, some of your thoughts on, you know, kind of this new way to work and, and the human factors in this new, this new kind of reality that we're kind of evolving into, I guess. >>Yeah. I missed was an interest of mine. I think, um, back in the nineties, I wrote an article called, um, a coauthored, an article called two cheers for the virtual office. And, you know, it was just starting to emerge. Then some people were very excited about it. Some people were skeptical and, uh, we said two cheers rather than three cheers because clearly there's some shortcomings. And, you know, I keep seeing these pop up. It's great that we can work from our homes. It's great that we can accomplish most of what we need to do with a digital interface, but, um, you know, things like innovation and creativity and certainly, um, uh, a good, um, happy social life kind of requires some face to face contact every now and then. And so I, you know, I think we'll go back to an environment where there is some of that. >>Um, we'll have, um, times when people convene in one place so they can get to know each other face to face and learn from each other that way. And most of the time, I think it's a huge waste of people's time to commute into the office every day and to jump on airplanes, to, to, um, give every little, um, uh, sales call or give every little presentation. Uh, we just have to really narrow down what are the circumstances where face to face contact really matters. And when can we get by with, with digital, you know, I think one of the things in my current work I'm finding is that even when you have AI based decision making, you really need a good platform in which that all takes place. So in addition to these virtual platforms, we need to develop platforms that kind of structure the workflow for us and tell us what we should be doing next, then make automated decisions when necessary. And I think that ultimately is a big part of biz ops as well. It's not just the intelligence of an AI system, but it's the flow of work that kind of keeps things moving smoothly throughout your organization. >>Yeah. I think such, such a huge opportunity as you just said, cause I forget the stats on how often we're interrupted with notifications between email texts, Slack, a sauna, Salesforce, the list goes on and on. So, you know, to put an AI layer between the person and all these systems that are begging for attention, and you've written a book on the attention economy, which is a whole nother topic, we'll say for another day, you know, it really begs, it really begs for some assistance because you know, you just can't get him picked, you know, every two minutes and really get quality work done. It's just not, it's just not realistic. And you know what? I don't think that's a feature that we're looking for. I agree. Totally. Alright, Tom. Well, thank you so much for your time. Really enjoyed the conversation. I gotta dig into the library. It's very long. So I might start at the attention economy. I haven't read that one in to me. I think that's the fascinating thing in which we're living. So thank you for your time and, uh, great to see you. >>My pleasure, Jeff. Great to be here. >>All right. Take care. Alright. He's Tom I'm Jeff. You are watching the continuing coverage of the biz ops manifesto and Vale. Thanks for watching the cube. We'll see you next time.
SUMMARY :
a BizOps manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. Good to see you again. And I think you said you're at a fun, exotic place on the East coast Realm of Memphis shoes. Great to see you again, where are you coming in from? you know, you can do better stuff within your own company, surge, why don't we start with you? whether we're talking about vendors or, um, you know, system integrators, consulting firms are talking Why did you get involved in this, in this effort? And I think we got a lot of improvement at the team level, and I think that was just no. I wonder if you could kind of share your And in general, I think, you know, we've just kind of optimize that to narrow for a long time and it's been, you know, kind of trucking along and then covert hit and you know, when we look at certain parts of the industry, you know, we see some things which are very disturbing, you know, in many ways and make cover. And, you know, we talk about people process we, we realized that to be successful with any kind of digital transformation you So I wonder if you can just share your thoughts on, you know, using flow as a way to think You need to optimize how you innovate and how you deliver value to the business and the customer. and really, you know, force them to, to look at the, at the prioritization and make And, um, you know, it's, it's a difficult aspect but if the culture doesn't adopt it and people don't feel good about it, you know, it's not going to be successful and that's in the context that is relevant and understandable for, for different stakeholders, whether we're talking about you know, metrics that they are used to to actually track you start to, And so you really want to start And, you know, what are the factors that are making and the technology that supports it, you run a pretty big Um, so you know, is the, is the big data I'm just going to use that generically um, you know, at some point maybe we reached the stage where we don't do um, and taking the lessons from agile, you know, what's been the inhibitor to stop and make sure that every development the organization is focused on those as well as the business itself, that we're measuring value So gentlemen, uh, thank you again for, for your time. And thank you for sharing your thoughts with us here on the cube. And we'd like to welcome you back to our And it's, you know, I really applaud, you know, this whole movement, I mean, whether I never sit down and say, you know, the product management team has to get aligned with Deb, Maybe trying to eliminate the word alignment, you know, from a lot of our organizations, Um, the ones that, that jumps out though is really about, you know, change, you know, it's kind of a, now an analogy for transformation. instituting the whole program, implement, you know, the program, increment planning, capabilities and kind of model is, um, and also, uh, you know, on that shorter increment, to really kind of just put them down on paper and you know, I can't help, but think of, So, um, you know, you really, I think we've attacked that in a variety And so when we pie plan, you know, myself and Cameron and the other members of our leadership, So they can, you know, quickly ship code that works. mixed book, you know, it was a great piece on a, you're talking about, you know, as part of the manifesto is that people are building is obviously becoming bigger and bigger, you know, in an, in many ways, right. But the sudden, you know, light switch moment, everybody had to go work from home and in March 15th And we kind of, you know, we started with John and built, you know, out of concentric circles of momentum and, to be able to pivot faster, deliver incrementally, you know, and operate in a different, to get behind these, but if it takes, you know, something a little bit more formal, uh, And I think it's a very analogous, you know, And at least you can measure it again and you can, and you've got some type of a comp and that is really the only way to, It's great to be here. And if you want to check out the biz ops, Manifesta go to biz ops, of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. or we're excited to have some of the foundational people that, you know, have put their, put their name on the dotted, It's good to be close to the U S and it's going to have the Arabic cleaner as well. there at Xerox park, you know, some of the lessons you learned and what you've been able to kind of carry forward And of course, there's, as, as you noticed, there's just this DNA of innovation and excitement And I realized none of this was really working, that there was something else, So, you know, the agile movement got started about 20 years ago, And the way that the business was working was planning was investing the right measurement data sets so that you can make the right decisions in terms of what you're investing, different from the way that you measure business outcomes. And it's really interesting to me cause I know, you know, flow on one hand is kind of a workflow And this is really what if you go to the biz ops manifesto, it says, I focus on outcomes And how quickly did you learn and how quickly did you use that data to drive to that next outcome? And you know, I love that you took this approach really of having kind of four So really the key thing is, is to move away from those old ways of doing things But the key thing is what you need to stop doing to focus on these. And I, you know, I think at the same thing, always about Moore's law, And you also make it sound so simple, but again, if you don't have the data driven visibility the AP testing was not even possible with all of those inefficiencies. you know, you have to constantly be delivering value and upgrading that value because you're constantly taking money Well, that really is based on how many features you delivered or how much, how big, how many quality improvements or scalar I wonder if you can, again, you've got some great historical perspective, So the key thing that I've noticed is that if you can model you know, more senior people being overloaded and creating bottlenecks where they didn't exist. Well, you know, what's the biggest inhibitor for most people but the key thing is just to get you set up it's to get started and to get the key wins. continue to spread that well, uh, you know, good for you through the book and through your company. They'd love to have you do it. of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. It's the biz ops manifesto unveiling a thing's Hi, good to see you, Jeff. What is the biz ops manifesto? years later, and if you look at the current state of the industry, uh, the product, not just, uh, by, you know, providing them with support, but also, of COVID, which, you know, came along unexpectedly. and you know, if you, if you go back to, uh, I think you'll unmask a few years And the reality is that if you look at it, especially in the last decade, I just liked that you put down these really simple, you know, kind of straightforward core values. you know, another example, for instance, one of our customers in the, uh, in the airline industry And yet, um, you know, the, it teams, whether it's operations, software environments were And there's a good ROI when you talk about, you know, companies not measuring and again, back to a product project management Institute, um, there, And so if you start to think about quality as fitness for purpose, And so, you know, if I'm, But I want to talk about, you know, one of the key ones, which you just talked about, of the speed of change and, and, and, and making that, you know, Um, again, back to one of these surveys that we did with, Um, and you know, we, we talk about kind of this, Why the coalition, why, you know, take these concepts out to a broader audience, all of us, whether we're talking about, you know, consulting agile transformation experts, So we're very pleased at if you look at, uh, And, uh, you know, congratulations to you and the team. manifesto.org, read it and you can sign it and you can stay here for more coverage. of this ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by bill. It's been in the works for awhile, but today's the day that it actually kind of come out to the, So let's just jump into it, you know, and getting ready for this. deal with that issue with, you know, a new framework, eventually a broad set get that to the business side, because as the pace of change has changed on the software side, you know, And the, you know, the idea of kind of ops With the, with the biz ops coalition, you know, getting a collection of, and a manifesto is just a good way to kind of lay out what you see as the key principles Um, and how has that's evolved over, over time, you know, I think at least for, you know, repetitive tactical decisions, And my question is, you know, what are kind of the attributes of and we interviewed with somebody who said, you know, it's amazing what eight weeks we knew, but I wanna, I wanna follow up on that because you know, and AI applications, but I think you could, you could use it much more broadly to talk about your you know, you speak generally about this topic all the time, but how people should really be thinking about where Yeah, well, you know, even talking about automated decisions, So, you know, sucking data out of a contract in order to compare And he built a business on those, you know, very simple little facts what AI has been doing for a long time, which is, you know, making smarter decisions everybody had to work from home and it was, you know, kind of crisis and get everybody set up. And so I, you know, I think we'll go back to an environment where there is some of you know, I think one of the things in my current work I'm finding is that even when on the attention economy, which is a whole nother topic, we'll say for another day, you know, We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Patrick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adrian Cockcroft | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Charles | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thomas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lucio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cape Cod | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Davenport | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Terry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cameron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
March 15th | DATE | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
16% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mitt Kirsten | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.99+ |
77% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vancouver | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Harvard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
seven months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ITA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
20 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Genpact | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
99 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Procter | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
North Korea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chris Wright, Red Hat v2
(gentle music) >> Narrator: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of AnsibleFest 2020 brought to you by Red Hat. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. Welcome back to our continuous coverage of AnsibleFest 2020. We're not in person this year, as everybody knows, but we're back covering the event. We're excited to be here and really our next guest we've had him on a lot of times. He's super insightful coming right off the keynote, driving into some really interesting topics that we're excited to get into. It's Chris Wright, he's the Chief Technology Officer of Red Hat Chris, great to see you. >> Hey, great to see you. Thanks for having me on. >> Absolutely. So let's jump into it. I mean, you covered so many topics in your keynote. The first one though, that just jumps off the page, right, is automation and really rethinking automation. You know, and I remember talking to a product manager at a hyperscaler many months ago, and he talked about the process of them mapping out their growth and trying to figure out how are they going to support it in their own data center. And he just basically figured out, we cannot do this at scale without automation. So I think the hyperscaler has been doing it, but really it's kind of a new approach for enterprises to incorporate new and more automation in what they do every day. >> It's a fundamental part of scaling. And I think we've learned over time that one we need programming interfaces on everything. So that's a critical part of beginning of the automation journey. So now you have a programmatic way to interact with all the things out there. But the other piece is just creating really confidence in knowing that when you're automating and you're taking tasks away from humans which are actually error prone and typing on the keyboard is not always the greatest way to get things done. The confidence that those automation scripts or playbooks are going to do the right things at the right time. And so, creating really a business and a mindset around infusing automation everything you do is a pretty big journey for the enterprise >> Right. And that's one of the topics you talked about as well. And you know it comes up all the time with digital transformation or software development. This kind of shift the focus from, you know, kind of it's a destination to it's a journey. And you talked very specifically that you need to think about automation as a journey and as a process and even a language, and really bake it into as many processes as you possibly can. I'm sure that shocks a lot of people and probably scares them but really that's the only way to achieve these types of scales that we're seeing out there. >> Well, I think so. And part of what I was trying to highlight is the notion that a business is filled with people with domain expertise. So everybody brings something to the table. You're a business analyst, you understand the business part of what you're providing. You're the technologist. You really understand the technology. There's a partner ecosystem coming in with a critical parts of the technology stack. And when you want to bring this all together, you need to have a common way to communicate. And the... What I was really trying to point out is a language for communication across all those different cross functional parts of your business is critical. Number one, and number two, that language can actually be an automation language. And so, choosing that language wisely obviously we're talking to AnsibleFest. So we're going to be talking a lot about Ansible in this context. Treating that language wisely is part of how you build the end to end sort of internalized view of what automation means to your business. >> Right. I wrote down a bunch of quotes that you talked about, you know, Ansible is the language of automation, and automation should be a primary communication language. Again, very different kind of language that we don't hear. Now, it's more than a tool but a process a constant process and should be an embedded component of any organization. So, I mean, you're really talking about automation as a first class citizen, not kind of this last thing for the most advanced or potentially last thing for the most simple things where we can apply this process, but really needs to be a fundamental core of the way you think about everything that you do. Really a very different way to think about things and probably really appropriate, you know, as we come out of 2020 in this kind of new world where, you know, everyone like distributed teams, well now you have distributed teams. And so, you know, the forcing function on better tooling, that's really wrapped in better culture has never been greater than we're seeing today. >> I completely agree with that. And that domain expertise, I think we understand well in certain areas. So for example, application developers, they rely on one another. So, you maybe as an application developer consuming a service from somebody else in your microservices architecture, and so you're dependent on that other engineering team's domain expertise. Maybe that's even the database service, and you're not a database DBA or an engineer that really builds schemas for databases. So we kind of get that notion of encapsulating domain expertise in the building and delivering about applications that notion the CICD pipeline, which itself is automating how you build and deliver applications, that notion of encapsulating domain expertise across a series of different functions in your business can go much broader than just building and delivering the application. It's running your business. And that's where it becomes fundamental. It becomes a process. That's the journey, you know, not the end state, but it's the... And it's not the destination, it's the journey that matters. And I've seen some really interesting ways that people actually work on this and try to approach it from the, "How do you change your mindset?" Here's one example that I thought was really unique. I was speaking with a customer who quite literally automated their existing process, and what they did was automate everything from generating the emails to the PDFs, which would then be shared as basically printed out documents for how they walked through business change when they're making a change in their product. And the reason they did that was not because that was the most efficient model at all. It was... That was the way they could get the teams comfortable with automation. If it produced the same artifacts that they were already used to, then it created confidence and then they could sort of evolve the model to streamline it because printing out a piece of paper to review it is not going to be the efficient way to (indistinct) change your business. >> Well, just to follow up on that, right? Cause I think what would probably scares a lot of people about automation, one is exception handling and can you get all the Edge cases in the use cases? So in the one you just talked about, how do they deal with that? And then I think the other one is just simply control. Do I feel confident enough that I can get the automation to a place that I'm comfortable to hand over control? And I'm just curious in that case you just outlined how do they deal with kind of those two factors? >> Well, they always enabled a human checkpoint, so especially in the beginning. So it was sort of trust but verify that model and over time you can look at the things that you really understand well and start with those and the things that have more kind of gray zones, where the exceptions may be the rule or maybe the critical part of the decision making process. Those can be sort of flagged as needs real kind of human intervention. And that's a way to sort of evolve and iterate and not start off with the notion that everything has to be automated. You can do it piecemeal and grow over time and you'll build confidence and you'll understand how to flag those exceptions, where you actually need to change your process itself because you may have bottlenecks that don't really make sense for the business anymore and where you can incorporate the exception handling into the automation essentially. >> Right, that's great. Thank you for sharing that example. I want to shift gears a little bit cause another big topic that you covered in your keynote that we talk about all the time on theCUBE is Edge. So everybody knows what a data center is, everybody knows what a public cloud is, you know lots of conversations around hybrid cloud and multicloud, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera. But this new thing is Edge and I think people talk about Edge in kind of an esoteric way, but I think you just nailed it. I mean you just nailed it very simply, moving the compute to where the data is collected and or consumed. You know I thought that was super elegant, but what you didn't get into on all the complexity is what means. I mean data centers are our pristine environments that they're very, very controlled, the environment's controlled, the network is controlled, the security is controlled and you have the vision of an Edge device and the one everyone always likes to use let's say like a wind farm. Those things are out in crazy harsh conditions and then there's still this balancing act as to what information does get stored and processed and used and then what does have to go back to the data center because it's not a substitute for the data center it's really an extension of the data center or maybe the data center is actually an extension of the Edge. Maybe that's a better way to think of it but we've had all these devices out there, now suddenly we're connecting them and bringing them into a network and add a control. And I just thought the Edge represents such a big shift in the way we're going to see compute change probably as fundamental I would imagine as the cloud shift has been. >> I believe it is, I absolutely believe it's as big a change in the industry as the cloud has been. The cloud really created scale, it created automation, programmatic interfaces to infrastructure and higher level services. But it also was built around a premise of centralization. I mean clouds themselves are distributed and so you can create availability zones and resilient applications, but there's still a sense of centralization. Edge is really embracing the notion that data production is kind of only up into the right and the way to scale processing that data and turning that data into insights and information that's valuable for our business is to bring compute closer to data. Not really a new concept, but the scale at which it's happening is what's really changing how we think about building infrastructure and building the support behind all that processing and it's that scale that requires automation. Because you're just not going to be able to manage thousands or tens of thousands or in certain scenarios even millions of devices without putting automation at the forefront. It's critical. >> Right. And we can't talk about Edge without talking about 5G and I laugh every time I'm watching football on Sundays and they have the 5G commercials on talking about my handset that I can order my food to get delivered faster at my house like completely missing the point. 5G is about machine to machine communication and the scale and the speed and the volume of machine to machine is so fundamentally different than humans talking voice to voice. And that's really this big drivers to instrument as you said, all these machines, all these devices there's already been sensors on them forever but now the ability to actually connect them and pull them into this network and start to use the data and control the machines is a huge shift in the way things are going to happen going forward. >> A couple of things that are important in there. Number one, that data production and sensors and bringing computer closer to data, what that represents is bringing the digital world and the physical world closer together. We'll experience that at a personal level with how we communicate we're already distributed in today's environment and the ways we can augment our human connections through a digital medium are really going to be important to how we maintain our human connections. And then on the enterprise side, we're building this infrastructure in 5G that when you think about it from a consumer point of view and ordering your pizza faster it really isn't the right way to think about it. Couple of key characteristics of 5G. Greater bandwidth, so you can just push more package to the network. Lower latency, so you're closer to the data and higher connection density and more reliable connections. And that kind of combination of characteristics make it really valuable for enterprise businesses. You can bring your data and compute close together you have these highly reliable and dense connections that allow for device proliferation and that's the piece that's really changing where the world's going. I like to think of it in a really simple way which is, 4G and the cloud and the smartphone created a world that today we take for granted, 10 years ago we really couldn't imagine what it looked like. 5G, device proliferation and Edge computing today is building the footprint for what we can't really imagine what we will be taking for granted in 10 years from now. So we're at this great kind of change inflection point in the industry. >> I have to always take a moment to call out (indistinct). I think it's the most underappreciated law and it's been stolen by other people and repackage many ways, but it's basically we overestimate the impact of these things in the short term and we way, way, way, way, kind of underestimate the impact in the longterm and I think your story in they keynote about once we had digital phones and smartphones, we don't even think twice about looking at a map and where are we and where is a store close buy-in are they open and is there a review? I mean the infrastructure to put that together kind of an API based economy which is pulling together all these bits and pieces the stupid relay expectation of performance and how fast that information is going to be delivered to me. I think we still take it for granted, as you said I think it's like magic and we never thought of all the different applications of these interconnected apps enabled by and always on device that's always connected and knows where we are it's a huge change. And as you say that when we think about 5G, 10 years from now, oh my goodness, where are we going to be? >> It's hard to imagine? It really is hard to imagine and I think that's okay. And what we're doing today is introducing everything that we need to help businesses evolve, take advantage of that and that scale of the Edge is a fundamental characteristic of the Edge. And so automating to manage that scale is the only way you're going to be successful and extending what we've learned in the data center, how to the Edge using the same tools, the things we already understand really is a great way to evolve a business. And that's where that common language and the discussions that I was trying to generate around Ansible as a great tool, but it's not just the tool, it's the whole process, the mindset. The culture changed the way you change how you operate your business that's going to allow us to take advantage of the future where my clothes are full of sensors and you can look through a video camera and tell immediately that I'm happy with this conversation. That's a very different kind of augmented reality than we have today and maybe it's a bad example but it's hard to imagine really what it will be like. >> So, Chris, I just want to close on a slight shift. We've been talking a lot about technology, but you talk about culture all the time and really it's about the people and I think a number of times in the keynote you reinforced this is about people and culture. And I just had InaMarie Johnson on the Chief Diversity Officer from Zendesk and she said culture eats strategy for breakfast. Great line. So I wonder if you can talk about the culture because it's very different and you've seen it in opensource from Red Hat for a long time really a shifting culture around opensource the shifting culture around DevOps and continuous delivery and change is a good thing, not a bad thing and we want to be able to change our code frequently and push out new features. So again, as you think of automation and culture, what kind of comes to mind and what should people be thinking about when they think about the people and less about the technology? >> Well, there's a couple of things. Some I'll reinforce what we already touched on which is the notion of creating confidence in the automation. So there's an element of trust associated with that and that's more maybe trusting the technology. So when you're automating something you've already got a process, you already understand how something works, it's turning that something into an automated script or playbook in the Ansible context and trusting that it's going to do the right thing. There's another important part of trust which is getting more to the people part. And I've learned this a lot from open source communities collaboration and communities are fundamentally built around trust and human trust relationships. And the change in process, trusting not only that the tools are going to the right job but that people are really assuming good intent and working with or trying to build for the right outcomes for your business. I think that's a really important part of the overall picture. And then finally that trust is extended to knowing that that change for the business isn't going to compromise your job. So thinking differently about what is your job? Is your job to do the repetitive task or is your job to free up your time from that repetitive task to think more creatively about value you can bring to the business. And that's where I think it's really challenging for organizations to make changes because you build a personal identity around the jobs that you do and making changes to those personal identities really gets to the core of who you are as a person. And that's why I think it's so complicated. The tools almost start the easy part, it's the process changes and the cultural changes, the mindset changes behind that which is difficult but more powerful in the end. >> Well, I think people process tools the tech is always the easy part relative to culture and people in changing the way people do things and as you said, who their identity is, how they get kind of wrapped into what they do and what they think their value is and who they are. So to free them up from that that's a really important point. Well, Chris, I always love having you on, thank you for coming on again, sharing your insight, great keynote. And give your the last word about AnsibleFest 2020. What are you looking forward to take away from this little show? >> Well, number one, my personal hope is that the conversation that I was trying to sort of ignite through the keynote is an opportunity for the community to see where Ansible fits in the Edge and automation and helping really the industry at large scale. And that key part of bringing a common language to help change how we communicate internally is the message I was hoping to impart on the AnsibleFest Community. And so hopefully we can take that broader and appreciate the time here to really amplify some of those messages. >> All right, great. Well, thanks a lot Chris and have a great day. >> Thanks Jeff, thank you. >> All right. He's Chris, I'm Jeff you're watching theCUBE and our ongoing coverage of AnsibleFest 2020. Thanks for watching we'll see you next time. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Red Hat. back covering the event. Hey, great to see you. and he talked about the process of beginning of the automation journey. but really that's the only way of the technology stack. of the way you think about and delivering the application. So in the one you just talked about, and the things that have and the one everyone always likes to use and the way to scale processing that data and the scale and the speed and the volume and the ways we can augment I mean the infrastructure and that scale of the Edge is and really it's about the people and the cultural changes, and as you said, who their identity is, and appreciate the time here and have a great day. and our ongoing coverage
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Wright | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
InaMarie Johnson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zendesk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ansible | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two factors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
AnsibleFest | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
AnsibleFest 2020 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.97+ |
tens of thousands | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
DevOps | TITLE | 0.88+ |
5G | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Sundays | DATE | 0.87+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
many months ago | DATE | 0.79+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Couple | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
AnsibleFest 2020 | TITLE | 0.75+ |
devices | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
number two | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
Number one | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
Ansible | TITLE | 0.69+ |
football | TITLE | 0.67+ |
Edge | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.65+ |
opensource | TITLE | 0.52+ |
5G | TITLE | 0.46+ |
2020 | EVENT | 0.44+ |
5G | OTHER | 0.37+ |
BizOps Manifesto Unveiled - Full Stream
>>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage, a BizOps manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. >>Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with the cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of the biz ops manifesto. Unveil. Something has been in the works for a little while. Today's the formal unveiling, and we're excited to have three of the core of founding members of the manifesto authors of the manifesto. If you will, uh, joining us again, we've had them all on individually. Now we're going to have a great power panel first up. We're gab Mitt, Kirsten returning he's the founder and CEO of Tasktop mic. Good to see you again. Where are you dialing in from? >>Great to see you again, Jeff I'm dialing from Vancouver, >>We're Canada, Vancouver, Canada. One of my favorite cities in the whole wide world. Also we've got Tom Davenport come in from across the country. He's a distinguished professor and author from Babson college, Tom. Great to see you. And I think you said you're at a fun, exotic place on the East coast >>Realm of Memphis shoe sits on Cape Cod. >>Great to see you again and also joining surge Lucio. He is the VP and general manager enterprise software division at Broadcom surge. Great to see you again, where are you coming in from? >>Uh, from Boston right next to kickoff. >>Terrific. So welcome back, everybody again. Congratulations on this day. I know it's, it's been a lot of work to get here for this unveil, but let's just jump into it. The biz ops manifesto, what was the initial reason to do this? And how did you decide to do it in a kind of a coalition, a way bringing together a group of people versus just making it an internal company, uh, initiative that, you know, you can do better stuff within your own company, surge, why don't we start with you? >>Yeah, so, so I think we were at a really critical juncture, right? Many, um, large enterprises are basically struggling with their digital transformation. Um, in fact, um, many recognize that, uh, the, the business side, it collaboration has been, uh, one of the major impediments, uh, to drive that kind of transformation. And if we look at the industry today, many people are, whether we're talking about vendors or, um, you know, system integrators, consulting firms are talking about the same kind of concepts, but using very different language. And so we believe that bringing all these different players together, um, as part of the coalition and formalizing, uh, basically the core principles and values in a BizOps manifesto, we can really start to F could have a much bigger movement where we can all talk about kind of the same concepts and we can really start to provide, could have a much better support for large organizations to transform. Uh, so whether it is technology or services or, um, we're training, I think that that's really the value of bringing all of these players together, right. >>And Nick to you, why did you get involved in this, in this effort? >>So Ben close and follow the agile movement since it started two decades ago with that manifesto. >>And I think we got a lot of improvement at the team level, and I think as satisfies noted, uh, we really need to improve at the business level. Every company is trying to become a software innovator, uh, trying to make sure that they can adapt quickly and the changing market economy and what everyone's dealing with in terms of needing to deliver the customer sooner. However, agile practices have really focused on these metrics, these measures and understanding processes that help teams be productive. Those things now need to be elevated to the business as a whole. And that just hasn't happened. Uh, organizations are actually failing because they're measuring activities and how they're becoming more agile, how teams are functioning, not how much quickly they're delivering value to the customer. So we need to now move past that. And that's exactly what the that's manifested provides. Right, >>Right, right. And Tom, to you, you've been covering tech for a very long time. You've been looking at really hard challenges and a lot of work around analytics and data and data evolution. So there's a definitely a data angle here. I wonder if you could kind of share your perspective of what you got excited to, uh, to sign onto this manifesto. >>Sure. Well, I have, you know, for the past 15 or 20 years, I've been focusing on data and analytics and AI, but before that I was a process management guy and a knowledge management guy. And in general, I think, you know, we've just kind of optimized that to narrow a level, whether you're talking about agile or dev ops or ML ops, any of these kinds of ops oriented movements, we're making individual project, um, performance and productivity better, but we're not changing the business, uh, effectively enough. And that's the thing that appealed to me about the biz ops idea that we're finally creating a closer connection between what we do with technology and how it changes the business and provides value to it. >>Great. Uh, surge back to you, right? I mean, people have been talking about digital transformation for a long time and it's been, you know, kind of trucking along and then covert hit and it was instant lights, which everyone's working from home. You've got a lot more reliance on your digital tools, digital communication, uh, both within your customer base and your partner base, but also then your employees when you're, if you could share how that really pushed this all along. Right? Because now suddenly the acceleration of digital transformation is higher. Even more importantly, you got much more critical decisions to make into what you do next. So kind of your portfolio management of projects has been elevated significantly when maybe revenues are down, uh, and you really have to, uh, to prioritize and get it right. >>Yeah. Maybe I'll just start by quoting Satina Nello basically recently said that they're speeding the two years of digital preservation just last two months in any many ways. That's true. Um, but, but yet when we look at large enterprises, they're >>Still struggling with the kind of a changes in culture that they really need to drive to be able to disrupt themselves. And not surprisingly, you know, when we look at certain parts of the industry, you know, we see some things which are very disturbing, right? So about 40% of the personal loans today, or being, uh, origin data it's by fintechs, uh, of a like of Sophie or, uh, or a lending club, right? Not to a traditional brick and mortar for BEC. And so the, well, there is kind of a much more of an appetite and it's a, it's more of a survival type of driver these days. Uh, the reality is that's in order for these large enterprises to truly transform and engage with this digital transformation, they need to start to really align the business. And it, you know, in many ways, uh, make covered that agile really emerged from the core desire to truly improve software predictability between which we've really missed is all that we, we start to aligning the software predictability to business predictability and to be able to have continual sleep continuous improvement and measurement of business outcomes. So by aligning kind of these, uh, kind of inward metrics, that's, it is typically being using to business outcomes. We think we can start to really ELP different stakeholders within the organization to collaborate. So I think there is more than ever. There's an imperative to act now. Um, and, and resolves, I think is kind of the right approach to drive that transformation. Right. >>I want to follow up on the culture comment, uh, with Utah, because you've talked before about kind of process flow and process flow throughout a whore and an organization. And, you know, we talk about people process and tech all the time. And I think the tech is the easy part compared to actually changing the people the way they think. And then the actual processes that they put in place. It's a much more difficult issue than just the tech issue to get this digital transformation in your organization. >>Yeah. You know, I've always found that the soft stuff about, you know, the culture of the behavior, the values is the hard stuff to change and more and more, we, we realized that to be successful with any kind of digital transformation you have to change people's behaviors and attitudes. Um, we haven't made as much progress in that area as we might have. I mean, I've done some surveys suggesting that, um, most organizations still don't have data-driven cultures. And in many cases there is a lower percentage of companies that say they have that then, um, did a few years ago. So we're kind of moving in the wrong direction, which means I think that we have to start explicitly addressing that, um, cultural, behavioral dimension and not just assuming that it will happen if we, if we build a system, >>If we build it, they won't necessarily come. Right. >>Right. So I want to go to, to you Nick cause you know, we're talking about workflows and flow, um, and, and you've written about flow both in terms of, um, you know, moving things along a process and trying to find bottlenecks, identify bottlenecks, which is now even more important again, when these decisions are much more critical. Cause you have a lot less, uh, wiggle room in tough times, but you also talked about flow from the culture side and the people side. So I wonder if you can just share your thoughts on, you know, using flow as a way to think about things, to get the answers better. >>Yeah, absolutely. And I'll refer back to what Tom has said. If you're optimized, you need to optimize your system. You need to optimize how you innovate and how you deliver value to the business and the customer. Now, what we've noticed in the data, since that we've learned from customers, value streams, enterprise organizations, value streams, is that when it's taking six months at the end to deliver that value with the flow is that slow. You've got a bunch of unhappy developers, unhappy customers when you're innovating house. So high performing organizations we can measure at antenna flow time and dates. All of a sudden that feedback loop, the satisfaction, your developers measurably, it goes up. So not only do you have people context, switching glass, you're delivering so much more value to customers at a lower cost because you've optimized for flow rather than optimizing for these, these other approximate tricks that we use, which is how efficient is my adult team. How quickly can we deploy software? Those are important, but they do not provide the value of agility of fast learning of adaptability to the business. And that's exactly what the biz ops manifesto pushes your organization to do. You need to put in place this new operating model that's based on flow on the delivery of business value and on bringing value to market much more quickly than you were before. Right. >>I love that. And I'm gonna back to you Tom, on that to follow up. Cause I think, I don't think people think enough about how they prioritize what they're optimizing for, because you know, if you're optimizing for a versus B, you know, you can have a very different product that, that you kick out. And, you know, my favorite example is with Clayton Christianson and innovator's dilemma talking about the three inch hard drive, if you optimize it for power, you know, is one thing, if you optimize it for vibration is another thing and sure enough, you know, they missed it on the poem because it was the, it was the game console, which, which drove that whole business. So when you're talking to customers and we think we hear it with cloud all the time, people optimizing for a cost efficiency, instead of thinking about it as an innovation tool, how do you help them kind of rethink and really, you know, force them to, to look at the, at the prioritization and make sure they're prioritizing on the right thing is make just that, what are you optimizing for? >>Oh yeah. Um, you have one of the most important aspects of any decision or attempt to resolve a problem in an organization is the framing process. And, um, you know, it's, it's a difficult aspect to have the decision to confirm it correctly in the first place. Um, there, it's not a technology issue. In many cases, it's largely a human issue, but if you frame >>That decision or that problem incorrectly to narrowly say, or you frame it as an either or situation where you could actually have some of both, um, it, it's very difficult for the, um, process to work out correctly. So in many cases, I think we need to think more at the beginning about how we bring this issue or this decision in the best way possible before we charge off and build a system to support it. You know, um, it's worth that extra time to think, think carefully about how the decision has been structured. Right, >>Sir, I want to go back to you and talk about the human factors because as we just discussed, you can put it in great technology, but if the culture doesn't adopt it and people don't feel good about it, you know, it's not going to be successful and that's going to reflect poorly on the technology, even if that had nothing to do with it. And you know, when you look at the, the, the, the core values, uh, of the Bezos manifesto, you know, a big one is trust and collaboration, you know, learn, respond, and pivot. Wonder if you can share your thoughts on, on trying to get that cultural shift, uh, so that you can have success with the people, or excuse me, with the technology in the process and helping customers, you know, take this more trustworthy and kind of proactive, uh, position. >>So I think, I think at the ground level, it truly starts with the realization that we're all different. We come from different backgrounds. Uh, oftentimes we tend to blame the data. It's not uncommon my experiments that we spend the first 30 minutes of any kind of one hour conversation to debate the validity of the data. Um, and so, um, one of the first kind of, uh, probably manifestations that we've had or revelations as we start to engage with our customers is spoke just exposing, uh, high-fidelity data sets to different stakeholders from their different lens. We start to enable these different stakeholders to not debate the data. That's really collaborate to find a solution. So in many ways, when, when, when we think about kind of the types of changes we're trying to, to truly affect around data driven decision making, he told about bringing the data in context and the context that is relevant and understandable for, for different stakeholders, whether we're talking about an operator or develop for a business analyst. >>So that's, that's the first thing. The second layer I think, is really to provide context to what people are doing in their specific silo. And so I think one of the best examples I have is if you start to be able to align business KPI, whether you are counting, you know, sales per hour, or the engagements of your users on your mobile applications, whatever it is, you can start to connect that PKI to business KPI, to the KPIs that developers might be looking at, whether it is all the number of defects or velocity or whatever over your metrics that you're used to, to actually track you start to be able to actually contextualize in what we are, the effecting, basically a metric of that that is really relevant. And then what we see is that this is a much more systematic way to approach the transformation than say, you know, some organizations kind of creating some of these new products or services or initiatives, um, to, to drive engagements, right? >>So if you look at zoom, for instance, zoom giving away a it service to, uh, to education, he's all about, I mean, there's obviously a marketing aspect in there, but it's, it's fundamentally about trying to drive also the engagement of their own teams. And because now they're doing something for good and many organizations are trying to do that, but you only can do this kind of things in the limited way. And so you really want to start to rethink how you connect to, everybody's kind of a business objective fruit data, and now you start to get people to stare at the same data from their own lens and collaborate on all the data. Right, >>Right. That's a good, uh, Tom, I want to go back to you. You've been studying it for a long time, writing lots of books and getting into it. Um, why now, you know, what, why, why now are we finally aligning business objectives with, with it objectives? You know, why didn't this happen before? And, you know, what are the factors that are making now the time for this, this, this move with the, uh, with the biz ops? >>Well, and much of a past, it was sort of a back office related activity. And, you know, it was important for, um, uh, producing your paychecks and, uh, capturing the customer orders, but the business wasn't built around it now, every organization needs to be a software business, a data business, a digital business, the auntie has been raised considerably. And if you aren't making that connection between your business objectives and the technology that supports it, you run a pretty big risk of, you know, going out of business or losing out to competitors. Totally. So, um, and even if you're in, uh, an industry that hasn't historically been terribly, um, technology oriented customer expectations flow from, uh, you know, the digital native, um, companies that they work with to basically every industry. So you're compared against the best in the world. So we don't really have the luxury anymore of screwing up our it projects or building things that don't really work for the business. Um, it's mission critical that we do that well. Um, almost every time, I just want to fall by that, Tom, >>In terms of the, you've talked extensively about kind of these evolutions of data and analytics from artismal stage to the big data stage, the data economy stage, the AI driven stage and what I find diff interesting that all those stages, you always put a start date, you never put an end date. Um, so you know, is the, is the big data I'm just going to use that generically a moment in time finally here where we're, you know, off mahogany row with the data scientists, but actually can start to see the promise of delivering the right insight to the right person at the right time to make that decision. >>Well, I think it is true that in general, these previous stages never seemed to go away. The, um, the artisinal stuff is still being done, but we would like for less and less of it to be artisinal, we can't really afford for everything to be artisinal anymore. It's too labor and, and time consuming to do things that way. So we shift more and more of it to be done through automation and B to be done with a higher level of productivity. And, um, you know, at some point maybe we reached the stage where we don't do anything artisanally anymore. I'm not sure we're there yet, but we are, we are making progress. Right. >>Right. And Mick, back to you in terms of looking at agile, cause you're, you're such a student of agile. When, when you look at the opportunity with biz ops and taking the lessons from agile, you know, what's been the inhibitor to stop this in the past. And what are you so excited about? You know, taking this approach will enable. >>Yeah. I think both search and Tom hit on this is that in agile what's happened is that we've been measuring tiny subsets of the value stream, right? We need to elevate the data's there. Developers are working on these tools that delivering features that the foundations for for great culture are there. I spent two decades as a developer. And when I was really happy is when I was able to deliver value to customers, the quicker I was able to do that the fewer impediments are in my way, that quicker was deployed and running in the cloud, the happier I was, and that's exactly what's happening. If we can just get the right data, uh, elevated to the business, not just to the agile teams, but really this, these values of ours are to make sure that you've got these data driven decisions with meaningful data that's oriented around delivering value to customers. Not only these legacies that Tom touched on, which has cost center metrics. So when, from where for it being a cost center and something that provided email and then back office systems. So we need to rapidly shift to those new, meaningful metrics that are customized business centric and make sure that every development the organization is focused on those as well as the business itself, that we're measuring value. And that will help you that value flow without interruptions. >>I love that mic. Cause if you don't measure it, you can't improve on it and you gotta, but you gotta be measuring the right thing. So gentlemen, uh, thank you again for, for your time. Uh, congratulations on the, uh, on the unveil of the biz ops manifesto and bringing together this coalition, uh, of, of, uh, industry experts to get behind this. And, you know, there's probably never been a more important time than now to make sure that your prioritization is in the right spot and you're not wasting resources where you're not going to get the ROI. So, uh, congratulations again. And thank you for sharing your thoughts with us here on the cube. >>Thank you. >>Alright, so we had surge Tom and Mick I'm. Jeff, you're watching the cube. It's a biz ops manifesto unveil. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. >>Hey, welcome back. Variety. Jeff Frick here with the cube. We're in our Palo Alto studios, and we'd like to welcome you back to our continuing coverage of biz ops manifesto unveil some exciting day to really, uh, kind of bring this out into public. There's been a little bit of conversation, but today's really the official unveiling and we're excited to have our next guest is share a little bit more information on it. He's Patrick tickle. He's a chief product officer for planned view. Patrick. Great to see you. >>Yeah, it's great to be here. Thanks for the invite. So why >>The biz ops manifesto, why the biz ops coalition now when you guys have been at it, it's relatively mature marketplace businesses. Good. What was missing? Why, why this, why this coalition? >>Yeah. So, you know, again, why is, why is biz ops important and why is this something that I'm, you know, I'm so excited about, but I think companies as well, right? Well, no, in some ways or another, this is a topic that I've been talking to the market and our customers about for a long time. And it's, you know, I really applaud this whole movement. Right. And, um, it resonates with me because I think one of the fundamental flaws, frankly, of the way we have talked about technology and business literally for decades, uh, has been this idea of, uh, alignment. Those who know me, I occasionally get off on this little rant about the word alignment, right. But to me, the word alignment is, is actually indicative of the, of the, of the flaw in a lot of our organizations and biz ops is really, I think now trying to catalyze and expose that flaw. >>Right. Because, you know, I always say that, you know, you know, alignment implies silos, right. Instantaneously, as soon as you say there's alignment, there's, there's obviously somebody who's got a direction and other people that have to line up and that kind of siloed, uh, nature of organizations then frankly, the passive nature of it. Right. I think so many technology organizations are like, look, the business has the strategy you guys need to align. Right. And, and, you know, as a product leader, right. That's where I've been my whole career. Right. I can tell you that I never sit around. I almost never use the word alignment. Right. I mean, whether, you know, I never sit down and say, you know, the product management team has to get aligned with dev, right. Or the dev team has to get aligned with the delivery and ops teams. I mean, what I say is, you know, are we on strategy, right? >>Like we've, we have a strategy as a, as a full end to end value stream. Right. And that there's no silos. And I mean, look, every on any given day we got to get better. Right. But the context, the context we operate is not about alignment. Right. It's about being on strategy. And I think I've talked to customers a lot about that, but when I first read the manifesto, I was like, Oh yeah, this is exactly. This is breaking down. Maybe trying to eliminate the word alignment, you know, from a lot of our organizations, because we literally start thinking about one strategy and how we go from strategy to delivery and have it be our strategy, not someone else's that we're all aligning to. And I, and it's a great way to catalyze that conversation that I've, it's been in my mind for years, to be honest. Right. >>So, so much to unpack there. One of the things obviously, uh, stealing a lot from, from dev ops and the dev ops manifesto from 20 years ago. And, and as I look through some of the principles and I looked through some of the values, which are, you know, really nicely laid out here, you know, satisfy customer, do continuous delivery, uh, measure, output against real results. Um, the ones that, that jumps out though is really about, you know, change, change, right? Requirements should change frequently. They do change frequently, but I'm curious to get your take from a, from a software development point, it's easy to kind of understand, right. We're making this widget and our competitors, beta widget plus X, and now we need to change our plans and make sure that the plus X gets added to the plan. Maybe it wasn't in the plan, but you talked a lot about product strategy. So in this kind of continuous delivery world, how does that meld with, I'm actually trying to set a strategy, which implies the direction for a little bit further out on the horizon and to stay on that while at the same time, you're kind of doing this real time continual adjustments because you're not working off a giant PRD or MRD anymore. >>Yeah, yeah, totally. Yeah. You know, one of the terms, you know, that we use internally a lot and even with my customers, our customers is we talk about this idea of rewiring, right. And I think, you know, it's kind of a, now an analogy for transformation. And I think a lot of us have to rewire the way we think about things. Right. And I think at Planview where we have a lot of customers who live in that, you know, who operationalize that traditional PPM world. Right. And are shifting to agile and transforming that rewire is super important. And, and to your point, right, it's, you've just, you've got to embrace this idea of, you know, just iterative getting better every day and iterating, iterating, iterating as opposed to building annual plans or, you know, I get customers occasionally who asked me for two or three year roadmap. >>Right. And I literally looked at them and I go, there's no, there's no scenario where I can build a two or three year roadmap. Right. You, you, you think you want that, but that's not, that's not the way we run. Right. And I will tell you the biggest thing that for us, you know, that I think is matched the planning, uh, you know, patents is a word I like to use a lot. So the thing that we've like, uh, that we've done from a planning perspective, I think is matched impedance to continuous delivery is instituting the whole program, implement, you know, the program, increment planning, capabilities, and methodologies, um, in the scaled agile world. Right. And over the last 18 months to two years, we really have now, you know, instrumented our company across three value streams. You know, we do quarterly PI program increment 10 week planning, you know, and that becomes, that becomes the Terra firma of how we plan. >>Right. And it's, what are we doing for the next 10 weeks? And we iterate within those 10 weeks, but we also know that 10 weeks from now, we're gonna, we're gonna adjust iterate again. Right. And that shifting of that planning model to, you know, to being as cross-functional is that as that big room planning kind of model is, um, and also, uh, you know, on that shorter increment, when you get those two things in place, also the impedance really starts to match up, uh, with continuous delivery and it changes, it changes the way you plan and it changes the way you work. Right? >>Yeah. Their thing. Right. So obviously a lot of these things are kind of process driven, both within the values, as well as the principles, but there's a whole lot, really about culture. And I just want to highlight a couple of the values, right? We already talked about business outcomes, um, trust and collaboration, uh, data driven decisions, and then learn, respond and pivot. Right. A lot of those are cultural as much as they are process. So again, is it the, is it the need to really kind of just put them down on paper and, you know, I can't help, but think of, you know, the hammer and up the, a, the thing in the Lutheran church with it, with their manifesto, is it just good to get it down on paper? Because when you read these things, you're like, well, of course we should trust people. And of course we need an environment of collaboration and of course we want data driven decisions, but as we all know saying it and living, it are two very, very different things. >>Yeah. Good question. I mean, I think there's a lot of ways to bring that to life you're right. And just hanging up, you know, I think we've all been through the hanging up posters around your office, which these days, right. Unless you're going to hang a poster in everybody's home office. Right. You can't even, you can't even fake it that you think that might work. Right. So, um, you know, you really, I think we've attacked that in a variety of ways. Right. And you definitely have to, you know, you've got to make the shift to a team centric culture, right. Empowered teams, you know, that's a big deal. Right. You know, a lot of, a lot of the people that, you know, we lived in a world of quote, unquote work. We lived in a deep resource management world for a long, long time, and right. >>A lot of our customers still do that, but, you know, kind of moving to that team centric world is, uh, is really important and core to the trust. Um, I think training is super important, right. I mean, we've, you know, we've internally, right. We've trained hundreds employees over the last a year and a half on the fundamentals really of safe. Right. Not necessarily, you know, we've had, we've had teams delivering in scrum and the continuous delivery for, you know, for years, but the scaling aspect of it, uh, is where we've done a lot of training investment. Um, and then, you know, I think a leadership has to be bought in. Right. You know? And so when we pie plan, you know, myself and Cameron and the other members of our leadership, you know, we're NPI planning, you know, for, for four days. Right. I mean, it's, it's, you've got to walk the walk, you know, from top to bottom and you've got to train on the context. Right. And then you, and then, and, and then once you get through a few cycles where you've done a pivot, right. Or you brought a new team in, and it just works, it becomes kind of this virtuous circle where he'll go, man, this really works so much better than what we used to do. Right. >>Right. The other really key principle to this whole thing is, is aligning, you know, the business leaders and the business prioritization, um, so that you can get to good outcomes with the development and the delivery. Right. And we know again, and kind of classic dev ops to get the dev and the production people together. So they can, you know, quickly ship code that works. Um, but adding the business person on there really puts, puts a little extra responsibility that they, they understand the value of a particular feature or particular priority. Uh, they, they can make the, the, the trade offs and that they kind of understand the effort involved too. So, you know, bringing them into this continuous again, kind of this continuous development process, um, to make sure that things are better aligned and really better prioritize. Cause ultimately, you know, we don't live in an infinite resources situation and people gotta make trade offs. They gotta make decisions as to what goes and what doesn't go in for everything that goes. Right. I always say you pick one thing. Okay. That's 99 other things that couldn't go. So it's really important to have, you know, this, you said alignment of the business priorities as well as, you know, the execution within, within the development. >>Yeah. I think that, you know, uh, you know, I think it was probably close to two years ago. Forester started talking about the age of the customer, right. That, that was like their big theme at the time. Right. And I think to me what that, the age of the customer actually translates to and Mick, Mick and I are both big fans of this whole idea of the project, the product shift, mixed book, you know, it was a great piece on a, you're talking to Mick, you know, as part of the manifesto is one of the authors as well, but this shift from project to product, right? Like the age of the customer, in my opinion, the, the, the embodiment of that is the shift to a product mentality. Right. And, and the product mentality in my opinion, is what brings the business and technology teams together, right? >>Once you, once you're focused on a customer experience, that's delivered through a product or a service that's when I that's, when I started to go with the alignment problem goes away, right. Because if you look at software companies, right, I mean, we run product management models, you know, with software development teams, customer success teams, right. That, you know, the software component of these products that people are building is obviously becoming bigger and bigger, you know, in an, in many ways, right. More and more organizations are trying to model themselves over as operationally like software companies. Right. Um, they obviously have lots of other components in their business than just software, but I think that whole model of customer experience equaling product, and then the software component of product, the product is the essence of what changes that alignment equation and brings business and teams together because all of a sudden, everyone knows what the customer's experiencing. Right. And, and that, that, that makes a lot of things very clear, very quickly. >>Right. I'm just curious how far along this was as a process before, before covert hit, right. Because serendipitous, whatever. Right. But th the sudden, you know, light switch moment, everybody had to go work from home and in March 15th compared to now, we're in October, and this is going to be going on for a while, and it is a new normal and whatever that whatever's going to look like a year from now, or two years from now is TBD, you know, had you guys already started on this journey cause again, to sit down and actually declare this coalition and declare this manifesto is a lot different than just trying to do better within your own organization. >>Yeah. So we had started, uh, you know, w we definitely had started independently, you know, some, some, you know, I think people in the community know that, uh, we, we came together with a company called lean kit a handful of years ago, and I give John Terry actually one of the founders leaned to immense credit for, you know, kind of spearheading our cultural change and not, and not because of, we were just going to be, you know, bringing agile solutions to our customers, but because, you know, he believed that it was going to be a fundamentally better way for us to work. Right. And we kind of, you know, when we started with John and built, you know, out of concentric circles of momentum and, and we've gotten to the place where now it's just part of who we are, but, but I do think that, you know, COVID has, you know, um, I think pre COVID a lot of companies, you know, would, would adopt, you know, the, you would adopt digital slash agile transformation. >>Um, traditional industries may have done it as a reaction to disruption. Right. You know, and in many cases, the disruption to these traditional industries was, I would say a product oriented company, right. That probably had a larger software component, and that disruption caused a competitive issue or a customer issue that caused companies and tried to respond by transforming. I think COVID, you know, all of a sudden flatten that out, right. We literally all got disrupted. Right. And, and so all of a sudden, every one of us is dealing with some degree of market uncertainty, customer uncertainty, uh, and also know none of us were insulated from the need to be able to pivot faster, deliver incrementally, you know, and operate in a different, completely more agile way, uh, you know, post COVID. Right. Yeah. That's great. >>So again, a very, very, very timely, you know, a little bit of serendipity, a little bit of, of planning. And, you know, as, as with all important things, there's always a little bit of luck and a lot of hard work involved. So a really interesting thank you for, for your leadership, Patrick. And, you know, it really makes a statement. I think when you have a bunch of leaderships across an industry coming together and putting their name on a piece of paper, uh, that's aligned around us some principles and some values, which again, if you read them who wouldn't want to get behind these, but if it takes, you know, something a little bit more formal, uh, to kind of move the ball down the field, and then I totally get it and a really great work. Thanks for, uh, thanks for doing it. >>Oh, absolutely. No. Like I said, the first time I read it, I was like, yeah, like you said, this is all, this all makes complete sense, but just documenting it and saying it and talking about it moves the needle. I'll tell you as a company, you gotta, we're pushing really hard on, uh, you know, on our own internal strategy on diversity inclusion. Right? And, and like, once we wrote the words down about what, you know, what we aspire to be from a diversity and inclusion perspective, it's the same thing. Everybody reads the words and goes, why wouldn't we do this? Right. But until you write it down and kind of have again, a manifesto or a Terrafirma of what you're trying to accomplish, you know, then you can rally behind it. Right. As opposed to it being something that's, everybody's got their own version of the flavor. Right. And I think it's a very analogous, you know, kind of, uh, initiative, right. And, uh, and this happening, both of those things, right. Are happening across the industry these days. Right. >>And measure it too. Right. And measure it, measure, measure, measure, get a baseline. Even if you don't like to measure, even if you don't like what the, even if you can argue against the math, behind the measurement, measure it, and at least you can measure it again and you can, and you've got some type of a comp and that is really the only way to, to move it forward. Well, Patrick really enjoyed the conversation. Thanks for, uh, for taking a few minutes out of your day. >>It's great to be here. It's an awesome movement and we're glad >>That'd be part of it. All right. Thanks. And if you want to check out the biz ops, Manifesta go to biz ops, manifesto.org, read it. You might want to sign it. It's there for you. And thanks for tuning in on this segment will continuing coverage of the biz op manifesto unveil here on the cube. I'm Jeff, thanks for watching >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. >>Hey, welcome back, everybody Jeffrey here with the cube. We're coming to you from our Palo Alto studios. And welcome back to this event is the biz ops manifesto unveiling. So the biz ops manifesto and the biz ops coalition had been around for a little while, but today's the big day. That's kind of the big public unveiling or excited to have some of the foundational people that, you know, have put their, put their name on the dotted, if you will, to support this initiative and talk about why that initiative is so important. And so the next guest we're excited to have is dr. Mick Kirsten. He is the founder and CEO of Tasktop mic. Great to see you coming in from Vancouver, Canada, I think, right? Yes. Thank you. Absolutely. I hope your air is a little better out there. I know you had some of the worst air of all of us, a couple, a couple of weeks back. So hopefully things are, uh, are getting a little better and we get those fires under control. Yeah. >>Things have cleared up now. So yeah, it's good. It's good to be close to the U S and it's going to have the Arabic cleaner as well. >>Absolutely. So let's, let's jump into it. So you you've been an innovation guy forever starting way back in the day and Xerox park. I was so excited to do an event at Xerox park for the first time last year. I mean, that, that to me represents along with bell labs and, and some other, you know, kind of foundational innovation and technology centers, that's gotta be one of the greatest ones. So I just wonder if you could share some perspective of getting your start there at Xerox park, you know, some of the lessons you learned and what you've been able to kind of carry forward from those days. >>Yeah. I was fortunate to join Xerox park in the computer science lab there at a very early point in my career, and to be working on open source programming languages. So back then in the computer science lab, where some of the inventions around programming around software development teams, such as object oriented programming, and a lot of what we had around really modern programming levels constructs, those were the teams I have the fortune of working with, and really our goal was. And of course there's as, as you know, uh, there's just this DNA of innovation and excitement and innovation in the water. And really it was the model back then was all about changing the way that we work, uh, was looking at for how we could make it 10 times easier to write code. But this is back in 99. And we were looking at new ways of expressing, especially business concerns, especially ways of enabling people who are, who want to innovate for their business to express those concerns in code and make that 10 times easier than what that would take. >>So we create a new open source programming language, and we saw some benefits, but not quite quite what we expected. I then went and actually joined Charles Stephanie, that former to fucking Microsoft who was responsible for, he actually got Microsoft word as a spark and into Microsoft and into the hands of bill Gates on that company. I was behind the whole office suite and his vision. And then when I was trying to execute with, working for him was to make PowerPoint like a programming language, make everything completely visual. And I realized none of this was really working in that there was something else, fundamentally wrong programming languages, or new ways of building software. Like let's try and do with Charles around intentional programming. That was not enough. >>That was not enough. So, you know, the agile movement got started about 20 years ago, and we've seen the rise of dev ops and really this kind of embracing of, of, of sprints and, you know, getting away from MRDs and PRDs and these massive definitions of what we're going to build and long build cycles to this iterative process. And this has been going on for a little while. So what was still wrong? What was still missing? Why the BizOps coalition, why the biz ops manifesto? >>Yeah, so I basically think we nailed some of the things that the program language levels of teams can have effective languages deployed soften to the cloud easily now, right? And at the kind of process and collaboration and planning level agile two decades, decades ago was formed. We were adopting and all the, all the teams I was involved with and it's really become a self problem. So agile tools, agile teams, agile ways of planning, uh, are now very mature. And the whole challenge is when organizations try to scale that. And so what I realized is that the way that agile was scaling across teams and really scaling from the technology part of organization to the business was just completely flawed. The agile teams had one set of doing things, one set of metrics, one set of tools. And the way that the business was working was planning was investing in technology was just completely disconnected and using a whole different set of advisors. >>Interesting. Cause I think it's pretty clear from the software development teams in terms of what they're trying to deliver. Cause they've got a feature set, right. And they've got bugs and it's easy to, it's easy to see what they deliver, but it sounds like what you're really honing in on is this disconnect on the business side, in terms of, you know, is it the right investment? You know, are we getting the right business ROI on this investment? Was that the right feature? Should we be building another feature or should we building a completely different product set? So it sounds like it's really a core piece of this is to get the right measurement tools, the right measurement data sets so that you can make the right decisions in terms of what you're investing, you know, limited resources. You can't, no one has unlimited resources and ultimately have to decide what to do, which means you're also deciding what not to do. And it sounds like that's a really big piece of this, of this whole effort. >>Yeah. Jeff, that's exactly it, which is the way that the agile team measures their own way of working is very different from the way that you measure business outcomes. The business outcomes are in terms of how happy your customers are, but are you innovating fast enough to keep up with the pace of a rapidly changing economy, rapidly changing market. And those are, those are all around the customer. And so what I learned on this long journey of supporting many organizations transformations and having them try to apply those principles of agile and dev ops, that those are not enough, those measures technical practices, those measured sort of technical excellence of bringing code to the market. They don't actually measure business outcomes. And so I realized that it really was much more around having these entwined flow metrics that are customer centric and business centric and market centric where we need it to go. Right. >>So I want to shift gears a little bit and talk about your book because you're also a bestselling author, a project, a product, and, and, and you, you brought up this concept in your book called the flow framework. And it's really interesting to me cause I know, you know, flow on one hand is kind of a workflow and a process flow and, and you know, that's how things get done and, and, and embrace the flow. On the other hand, you know, everyone now in, in a little higher level existential way is trying to get into the flow right into the workflow and, you know, not be interrupted and get into a state where you're kind of at your highest productivity, you know, kind of your highest comfort, which flow are you talking about in your book or is it a little bit about, >>Well, that's a great question. It's not what I get asked very often. Just to me, it's absolutely both. So that the thing that we want to get to, we've learned how to master individual flow. That is this beautiful book by me, how he teaches me how he does a beautiful Ted talk by him as well about how we can take control of our own flow. So my question with the book with project replies, how can we bring that to entire teams and really entire organizations? How can we have everyone contributing to a customer outcome? And this is really what if you go to the biz ops manifesto, it says, I focus on outcomes on using data to drive whether we're delivering those outcomes rather than a focus on proxy metrics, such as, how quickly did we implement this feature? No, it's really how much value did the customer go to the feature and how quickly did you learn and how quickly did you use that data to drive to that next outcome? >>Really that with companies like Netflix and Amazon have mastered, how do we get that to every large organization, every it organization and make everyone be a software innovator. So it's to bring that co that concept of flow to these entwined value streams. And the fascinating thing is we've actually seen the data. We've been able to study a lot of value streams. We see when flow increases, when organizations deliver value to a customer faster, developers actually become more happy. So things like the employee net promoter scores rise, and we've got empirical data for this. So the beautiful thing to me is that we've actually been able to combine these two things and see the results in the data that you increase flow to the customer. Your developers are more happy. >>I love it, right, because we're all more, we're all happier when we're in the flow and we're all more productive when we're in the flow. So I, that is a great melding of, of two concepts, but let's jump into the, into the manifesto itself a little bit. And, you know, I love that, you know, took this approach really of having kind of four key values and then he gets 12 key principles. And I just want to read a couple of these values because when you read them, it sounds pretty brain dead. Right? Of course. Right. Of course you should focus on business outcomes. Of course you should have trust and collaboration. Of course you should have database decision making processes and not just intuition or, you know, whoever's the loudest person in the room, uh, and to learn and respond and pivot. But what's the value of actually just putting them on a piece of paper, because again, this is not this, these are all good, positive things, right? When somebody reads these to you or tells you these are sticks it on the wall, of course. But unfortunately of course isn't always enough. >>No. And I think what's happened is some of these core principles originally from the agile manifesto two decades ago, uh, the whole dev ops movement of the last decade of flow feedback and continue learning has been key. But a lot of organizations, especially the ones that are undergoing digital transformations have actually gone a very different way, right? The way that they measure value in technology and innovation is through costs for many organizations. The way that they actually are looking at that they're moving to cloud is actually as a reduction in cost. Whereas the right way of looking at moving to cloud is how much more quickly can we get to the value to the customer? How quickly can we learn from that? And how quickly can we drive the next business outcome? So really the key thing is, is to move away from those old ways of doing things, a funny projects and cost centers, uh, to actually funding and investing in outcomes and measuring outcomes through these flow metrics, which in the end are your fast feedback and how quickly you're innovating for your customer. >>So these things do seem, you know, very obvious when you look at them. But the key thing is what you need to stop doing to focus on these. You need to actually have accurate realtime data of how much value your phone to the customer every week, every month, every quarter. And if you don't have that, your decisions are not driven on data. If you don't know what your boggling like is, and this is something that in decades of manufacturing, a car manufacturers, other manufacturers, master, they always know where the bottom back in their production processes. You ask a random CIO when a global 500 company where their bottleneck is, and you won't get a clear answer because there's not that level of understanding. So let's, you actually follow these principles. You need to know exactly where you fall. And I guess because that's, what's making your developers miserable and frustrated around having them context, which on thrash. So it, the approach here is important and we have to stop doing these other things, >>Right? There's so much there to unpack. I love it. You know, especially the cloud conversation, because so many people look at it wrong as, as, as a cost saving device, as opposed to an innovation driver and they get stuck, they get stuck in the literal and the, and you know, I think at the same thing, always about Moore's law, right? You know, there's a lot of interesting real tech around Moore's law and the increasing power of microprocessors, but the real power, I think in Moore's laws is the attitudinal change in terms of working in a world where you know that you've got all this power and what you build and design. I think it's funny to your, your comment on the flow and the bottleneck, right? Cause, cause we know manufacturing, as soon as you fix one bottleneck, you move to your next one, right? You always move to your next point of failure. So if you're not fixing those things, you know, you're not, you're not increasing that speed down the line, unless you can identify where that bottleneck is or no matter how many improvements you make to the rest of the process, it's still going to get hung up on that one spot. >>That's exactly it. And you also make it sound so simple, but again, if you don't have the data driven visibility of where that bottom line is, and these bottlenecks are adjusted to say defense just whack them. All right. So we need to understand is the bottleneck because our security reviews are taking too long and stopping us from getting value for the customer. If it's that automate that process. And then you move on to the next bottleneck, which might actually be that deploying yourself into the cloud. It's taking too long. But if you don't take that approach of going flow first, rather than again, that sort of cost reduction. First, you have to think of the approach of customer centricity and you only focused on optimizing costs. Your costs will increase and your flow will slow down. And this is just one of these fascinating things. >>Whereas if you focus on getting closer to the customer and reducing your cycles out on getting value, your flow time from six months to two weeks or two, one week or two event, as we see with the tech giants, you actually can both lower your costs and get much more value for us to get that learning loop going. So I think I've, I've seen all these cloud deployments and one of the things happened that delivered almost no value because there was such big bottlenecks upfront in the process and actually the hosting and the AP testing was not even possible with all of those inefficiencies. So that's why going float us rather than costs when we started our project versus silky. >>I love that. And, and, and, and it, it begs repeating to that right within the subscription economy, you know, you're on the hook to deliver value every single month because they're paying you every single month. So if you're not on top of how you're delivering value, you're going to get sideways because it's not like they pay a big down payment and a small maintenance fee every month. But once you're in a subscription relationship, you know, you have to constantly be delivering value and upgrading that value because you're constantly taking money from the customer. So it's such a different kind of relationship than kind of the classic, you know, big bang with a maintenance agreement on the back end really important. Yeah. >>And I think in terms of industry shifts that that's, it that's, what's catalyzed. This industry shift is in this SAS and subscription economy. If you're not delivering more and more value to your customers, someone else's, and they're winning the business, not you. So, one way we know is to delight our customers with great user experience as well. That really is based on how many features you delivered or how much, how much, how many quality improvements or scalar performance improvements we delivered. So the problem is, and this is what the business manifesto, as well as the flow frame of touch on is if you can't measure how much value you deliver to a customer, what are you measuring? You just backed again, measuring costs, and that's not a measure of value. So we have to shift quickly away from measuring costs to measuring value, to survive. And in the subscription economy, >>We could go for days and days and days. I want to shift gears a little bit into data and, and a data driven decision making a data driven organization cause right day has been talked about for a long time, the huge big data meme with, with Hadoop over, over several years and, and data warehouses and data lakes and data oceans and data swamps. And you can go on and on and on. It's not that easy to do, right? And at the same time, the proliferation of data is growing exponentially. We're just around the corner from, from IOT and five G. So now the accumulation of data at machine scale, again, is this gonna overwhelm? And one of the really interesting principles, uh, that I wanted to call out and get your take right, is today's organizations generate more data than humans can process. So informed decisions must be augmented by machine learning and artificial intelligence. I wonder if you can, again, you've got some great historical perspective, um, reflect on how hard it is to get the right data, to get the data in the right context, and then to deliver it to the decision makers and then trust the decision makers to actually make the data and move that down. You know, it's kind of this democratization process into more and more people and more and more frontline jobs making more and more of these little decisions every day. >>Yeah. I definitely think the front parts of what you said are where the promises of big data have completely fallen on their face into the swamps as, as you mentioned, because if you don't have the data in the right format, you've cannot connect, collected that the right way you want it, that way, the right way you can't use human or machine learning on it effectively. And there've been the number of data where, how has this in a typical enterprise organization and the sheer investment is tremendous, but the amount of intelligence being extracted from those is, is, is a very big problem. So the key thing that I've noticed is that if you can model your value streams, so you actually understand how you're innovating, how you're measuring the delivery of value and how long that takes, what is your time to value through these metrics like full time? >>You can actually use both the intelligence that you've got around the table and push that down as well, as far as getting to the organization, but you can actually start using that those models to understand and find patterns and detect bottlenecks that might be surprising, right? Well, you can detect interesting bottlenecks when you shift to work from home. We detected all sorts of interesting bottlenecks in our own organization that were not intuitive to me that have to do with, you know, more senior people being overloaded and creating bottlenecks where they didn't exist. Whereas we thought we were actually an organization that was very good at working from home because of our open source roots. So the data is highly complex. Software value streams are extremely complicated. And the only way to really get the proper analysts and data is to model it properly and then to leverage these machine learning and AI techniques that we have. But that front part of what you said is where organizations are just extremely immature in what I've seen, where they've got data from all their tools, but not modeled in the right way. Right, right. >>Right. Well, all right. So before I let you go, you know, let's say you get a business leader. He, he buys in, he reads the manifesto, he signs on the dotted line and he says, Mick, how do I get started? I want to be more aligned with the, with the development teams. I know I'm in a very competitive space. We need to be putting out new software features and engage with our customers. I want to be more data-driven how do I get started? Well, you know, what's the biggest inhibitor for most people to get started and get some early wins, which we know is always the key to success in any kind of a new initiative. >>Right? So I think you can reach out to us through the website, uh, for the manifesto. But the key thing is just, it's definitely set up it's to get started and to get the key wins. So take a product value stream. That's mission critical if it'd be on your mobile and web experiences or part of your cloud modernization platform where your analytics pipeline, but take that and actually apply these principles to it and measure the end to end flow of value. Make sure you have a value metric that everyone is on the same page on, but the people on the development teams that people in leadership all the way up to the CEO, and one of the, where I encourage you to start is actually that end to end flow time, right? That is the number one metric. That is how you measure it, whether you're getting the benefit of your cloud modernization, that is the one metric that when the people I respect tremendously put into his cloud for CEOs, the metric, the one, the one way to measure innovation. So basically take these principles, deploy them on one product value stream measure, Antonin flow time, uh, and then you'll actually be well on your path to transforming and to applying the concepts of agile and dev ops all the way to, to the, to the way >>You're offering model. >>Well, Mick really great tips, really fun to catch up. I look forward to a time when we can actually sit across the table and, and get into this. Cause I just, I just love the perspective and, you know, you're very fortunate to have that foundational, that foundational base coming from Xerox park and they get, you know, it's, it's a very magical place with a magical history. So to, to incorporate that into, continue to spread that well, uh, you know, good for you through the book and through your company. So thanks for sharing your insight with us today. >>Thanks so much for having me, Jeff. Absolutely. >>All right. And go to the biz ops manifesto.org, read it, check it out. If you want to sign it, sign it. They'd love to have you do it. Stay with us for continuing coverage of the unveiling of the business manifesto on the cube. I'm Jeff. Rick. Thanks for watching. See you next time >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage, a biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. >>Hey, welcome back. You're ready. Jeff Frick here with the cube for our ongoing coverage of the big unveil. It's the biz ops manifesto manifesto unveil. And we're going to start that again from the top three And a Festo >>Five, four, three, two. >>Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with the cube come to you from our Palo Alto studios today for a big, big reveal. We're excited to be here. It's the biz ops manifesto unveiling a thing's been in the works for a while and we're excited to have our next guest. One of the, really the powers behind this whole effort. And he's joining us from Boston it's surge, Lucio, the vice president, and general manager enterprise software division at Broadcom surge. Great to see you. >>Hi, good to see you, Jeff. Glad to be here. >>Absolutely. So you've been in this business for a very long time. You've seen a lot of changes in technology. What is the biz ops manifesto? What is this coalition all about? Why do we need this today and in 2020? >>Yeah. So, so I've been in this business for close to 25 years, right? So about 20 years ago, the agile manifesto was created. And the goal of the agile manifesto was really to address the uncertainty around software development and the inability to predict the efforts to build software. And, uh, if you, if you roll that kind of 20 years later, and if you look at the current state of the industry of the product, the project management Institute, estimates that we're wasting about a million dollars, every 20 seconds in digital transformation initiatives that do not deliver on business results. In fact, we were recently served a third of the, a, a number of executives in partnership with Harvard >>Business review and 77% of those executives think that one of the key challenges that they have is really the collaboration between business and it, and that that's been kind of a case for, uh, almost 20 years now. Um, so the, the, the key challenge that we're faced with is really that we need a new approach. And many of the players in the industry, including ourselves have been using different terms, right? Some are being, are talking about value stream management. Some are talking about software delivery management. If you look at the site, reliability engineering movement, in many ways, it embodies a lot of these kind of concepts and principles. So we believed that it became really imperative for us to crystallize around, could have one concept. And so in many ways, the, a, the BizOps concept and the BizOps manifesto are bringing together a number of ideas, which has been emerging in the last five years or so, and, and defining the key values and principles to finally help these organizations truly transform and become digital businesses. And so the hope is that by joining our forces and defining public key principles and values, we can help the industry, uh, not just, uh, by, you know, providing them with support, but also tools and consulting that is required for them to truly achieve the kind of transformation that everybody's taking. >>Right. Right. So COVID now we're six months into it, approximately seven months into it. Um, a lot of pain, a lot of bad stuff still happening. We've got a ways to go, but one of the things that on the positive side, right, and you've seen all the memes and social media is, is a driver of digital transformation and a driver of change. Cause we had this light switch moment in the middle of March, and there was no more planning. There was no more conversation. You've suddenly got remote workforces, everybody's working from home and you got to go, right. So the reliance on these tools increases dramatically, but I'm curious, you know, kind of short of, of the beginnings of this effort in short of kind of COVID, which, you know, came along unexpectedly. I mean, what were those inhibitors because we've been making software for a very long time, right? The software development community has, has adopted kind of rapid change and, and iterative, uh, delivery and, and sprints, what was holding back the connection with the business side to make sure that those investments were properly aligned with outcomes. >>Well, so, so you have to understand that it is, is kind of a its own silos. And traditionally it has been treated as a cost center within large organizations and not as a value center. And so as a result, kind of a, the traditional dynamic between it and the business is basically one of a kind of supplier up to kind of a business. Um, and you know, if you go back to, uh, I think you'll unmask a few years ago, um, basically at this concept of the machines to build the machines and you went as far as saying that, uh, the, the machines or the production line is actually the product. So, uh, meaning that the core of the innovation is really about, uh, building, could it be engine to deliver on the value? And so in many ways, you know, we, we have missed on this shift from, um, kind of it becoming this kind of value center within the enterprises and end. >>He talks about culture. Now, culture is a, is a sum total of behaviors. And the reality is that if you look at it, especially in the last decade, uh, we've agile with dev ops with, um, I bring infrastructures, uh, it's, it's way more volatile today than it was 10 years ago. And so the, when you start to look at the velocity of the data, the volume of data, the variety of data to analyze the system, um, it's, it's very challenging for it to actually even understand and optimize its own processes, let alone, um, to actually include business as sort of an integral part of kind of a delivery chain. And so it's both kind of a combination of, of culture, um, which is required, uh, as well as tools, right? To be able to start to bring together all these data together, and then given the volume of variety of philosophy of the data. Uh, we have to apply some core technologies, which have only really, truly emerged in the last five to 10 years around machine learning and analytics. And so it's really kind of a combination of those freaks, which are coming together today, truly out organizations kind of get to the next level. Right, >>Right. So let's talk about the manifesto. Let's talk about, uh, the coalition, uh, the BizOps coalition. I just liked that you put down these really simple, you know, kind of straightforward core values. You guys have four core values that you're highlighting, you know, business outcomes, over individual projects and outputs, trust, and collaboration, oversight, load teams, and organizations, data driven decisions, what you just talked about, uh, you know, over opinions and judgment and learned, respond and pivot. I mean, surgery sounds like pretty basic stuff, right? I mean, aren't, isn't everyone working to these values already. And I think he touched on it on culture, right? Trust and collaboration, data driven decisions. I mean, these are fundamental ways that people must run their business today, or the person that's across the street, that's doing it. It's going to knock them out right off their block. >>Yeah. So that's very true. But, uh, so I'll, I'll mention an hour survey. We did, uh, I think about six months ago and it was in partnership with, uh, with, uh, an industry analyst and we serve at a, again, a number of it executives to understand only we're tracking business outcomes. I'm going to get the software executives, it executives we're tracking business outcomes. And the, there were less than 15% of these executives were actually tracking the outcomes of the software delivery. And you see that every day. Right? So in my own teams, for instance, we've been adopting a lot of these core principles in the last year or so, and we've uncovered that 16% of our resources were basically aligned around initiatives, which are not strategic for us. Um, I take another example, for instance, one of our customers in the, uh, in the airline industry and Harvard, for instance, that a number of, uh, um, that they had software issues that led to people searching for flights and not returning any kind of availability. >>And yet, um, you know, the it teams, whether it's operation software environments were completely oblivious to that because they were completely blindsided to it. And so the connectivity between kind of the inwards metrics that RT is using, whether it's database time, cycle time, or whatever metric we use in it are typically completely divorced from the business metrics. And so at its core, it's really about starting to align the business metrics with the, the, the software delivery chain, right? This, uh, the system, which is really a core differentiator for these organizations. It's about connecting those two things and starting to, um, infuse some of the agile culture and principles. Um, that's emerged from the software side into the business side. Um, of course the lean movement and other movements have started to change some of these dynamics on the business side. And so I think this, this is the moment where we are starting to see kind of the imperative to transform. Now, you know, Covina obviously has been a key driver for that. The, um, the technology is right to start to be able to weave data together and really kind of, uh, also the cultural shifts, uh, Prue agile through dev ops through, uh, the SRE movement, uh frulein um, business transformation, all these things are coming together and that are really creating kind of the conditions for the BizOps manifestor to exist, >>Uh, Clayton Christianson, great, uh, Harvard professor innovator's dilemma might steal my all time. Favorite business books, you know, talks about how difficult it is for incumbents to react to, to disruptive change, right? Because they're always working on incremental change cause that's what their customers are asking for. And there's a good ROI when you talk about, you know, companies not measuring the right thing. I mean, clearly it has some portion of their budget that has to go to keeping the lights on, right. That that's always the case, but hopefully that's an ever decreasing percentage of their total activity. So, you know, what should people be measuring? I mean, what are kind of the new metrics, um, in, in biz ops that drive people to be looking at the right things, measuring the right things and subsequently making the right decisions, investment decisions on whether they should do, you know, move project a along or project B. >>So there, there are only two things, right? So, so I think what you're talking about is portfolio management, investment management, right. And, um, which, which is a key challenge, right? Um, in my own experience, right? Uh, driving strategy or a large scale kind of software organization for years, um, it's very difficult to even get kind of a base data as to who is doing what, uh, um, I mean, some of our largest customers we're engaged with right now are simply trying to get a very simple answer, which is how many people do I have and that specific initiative at any point in time and just tracking that information is extremely difficult. So, and, and again, back to a product project management Institute, um, they're, they've estimated that on average, it organizations have anywhere between 10 to 20% of their resources focused on initiatives, which are not strategically aligned. >>So that's one dimension on portfolio management. I think the key aspect though, that we are really keen on is really around kind of the alignment of a business metrics to the it metrics. Um, so I'll use kind of two simple examples, right? And my background is around quality. And so I've always believed that fitness for purpose is really kind of a key, um, uh, philosophy if you will. And so if you start to think about quality as fitness for purpose, you start to look at it from a customer point of view, right. And fitness for purpose for core banking application or mobile application are different, right? So the definition of a business value that you're trying to achieve is different. Um, and so the, and yet, if you look at our, it, operations are operating, they were using kind of a same type of, uh, kind of inward metrics, uh, like a database of time or a cycle time, or what is my point of velocity, right? >>And, uh, and so the challenge really is this inward facing metrics that it is using, which are divorced from ultimately the outcome. And so, you know, if I'm, if I'm trying to build a poor banking application, my core metric is likely going to be uptime, right? If I'm trying to build a mobile application or maybe your social mobile app, it's probably going to be engagement. And so what you want is for everybody across it, to look at these metric, and what's hard, the metrics within the software delivery chain, which ultimately contribute to that business metric and some cases cycle time may be completely irrelevant, right? Again, my core banking app, maybe I don't care about cycle time. And so it's really about aligning those metrics and be able to start to differentiate, um, the key challenges you mentioned, uh, around the, the, um, uh, around the disruption that we see is, or the investors is the dilemma now is really around the fact that many it organizations are essentially applying the same approaches of, for innovation, right, for basically scrap work, then they would apply to kind of over more traditional projects. And so, you know, there's been a lot of talk about two-speed it, and yes, it exists, but in reality are really organizations, um, truly differentiating, um, all of the operate, their, their projects and products based on the outcomes that they're trying to achieve. And this is really where BizOps is trying to affect. >>I love that, you know, again, it doesn't seem like brain surgery, but focus on the outcomes, right. And it's horses for courses, as you said, this project, you know, what you're measuring and how you define success, isn't necessarily the same as, as on this other project. So let's talk about some of the principles we've talked about the values, but, you know, I think it's interesting that, that, that the BizOps coalition, you know, just basically took the time to write these things down and they don't seem all that, uh, super insightful, but I guess you just gotta get them down and have them on paper and have them in front of your face. But I want to talk about, you know, one of the key ones, which you just talked about, which is changing requirements, right. And working in a dynamic situation, which is really what's driven, you know, this, the software to change in software development, because, you know, if you're in a game app and your competitor comes out with a new blue sword, you've got to come out with a new blue sword. >>So whether you had that on your Kanban wall or not. So it's, it's really this embracing of the speed of change and, and, and, and making that, you know, the rule, not the exception. I think that's a phenomenal one. And the other one you talked about is data, right? And that today's organizations generate more data than humans can process. So informed decisions must be generated by machine learning and AI, and, you know, in the, the big data thing with Hadoop, you know, started years ago, but we are seeing more and more that people are finally figuring it out, that it's not just big data, and it's not even generic machine learning or artificial intelligence, but it's applying those particular data sets and that particular types of algorithms to a specific problem, to your point, to try to actually reach an objective, whether that's, you know, increasing the, your average ticket or, you know, increasing your checkout rate with, with, with shopping carts that don't get left behind and these types of things. So it's a really different way to think about the world in the good old days, probably when you got started, when we had big, giant, you know, MRDs and PRDs and sat down and coded for two years and came out with a product release and hopefully not too many patches subsequently to that. >>It's interesting. Right. Um, again, back to one of these surveys that we did with, uh, with about 600, the ITA executives, and, uh, and, and we, we purposely designed those questions to be pretty open. Um, and, and one of them was really role requirements and, uh, and it was really a wrong kind of what do you, what is the best approach? What is your preferred approach towards requirements? And if I remember correctly over 80% of the it executives set that the best approach they'll prefer to approach is for requirements to be completely defined before software development starts. Let me pause there where 20 years after the agile manifesto, right? And for 80% of these idea executives to basically claim that the best approach is for requirements to be fully baked before salt, before software development starts, basically shows that we still have a very major issue. >>And again, our hypothesis in working with many organizations is that the key challenge is really the boundary between business and it, which is still very much contract based. If you look at the business side, they basically are expecting for it deliver on time on budget, right. But what is the incentive for it to actually delivering all the business outcomes, right? How often is it measured on the business outcomes and not on an SLA or on a budget type criteria. And so that, that's really the fundamental shift that we need to, we really need to drive up as an industry. Um, and you know, we, we talk about kind of this, this imperative for organizations to operate that's one, and back to the innovator's dilemma. The key difference between these larger organization is, is really kind of a, if you look at the amount of capital investment that they can put into pretty much anything, why are they losing compared to, um, you know, startups? What, why is it that, uh, more than 40% of, uh, personal loans today or issued not by your traditional brick and mortar banks, but by, um, startups? Well, the reason, yes, it's the traditional culture of doing incremental changes and not disrupting ourselves, which Christiansen covered at length, but it's also the inability to really fundamentally change kind of a dynamic picture. We can business it and, and, and partner right. To, to deliver on a specific business outcome. Right. >>I love that. That's a great, that's a great summary. And in fact, getting ready for this interview, I saw you mentioning another thing where, you know, the, the problem with the agile development is that you're actually now getting more silos because you have all these autonomous people working, you know, kind of independently. So it's even a harder challenge for, for the business leaders to, to, to, as you said, to know, what's actually going on, but, but certainly I w I want to close, um, and talk about the coalition. Um, so clearly these are all great concepts. These are concepts you want to apply to your business every day. Why the coalition, why, you know, take these concepts out to a broader audience, including your, your competition and, and the broader industry to say, Hey, we, as a group need to put a stamp of approval on these concepts, values, these principles. >>So, first I think we, we want, um, everybody to realize that we are all talking about the same things, the same concepts. I think we were all from our own different vantage point, realizing that, um, things after change, and again, back to, you know, whether it's value stream management or site reliability engineering, or biz ops, we're all kind of using slightly different languages. Um, and so I think one of the important aspects of BizOps is for us, all of us, whether we're talking about, you know, consulting agile transformation experts, uh, whether we're talking about vendors, right, provides kind of tools and technologies, or these large enterprises to transform for all of us to basically have kind of a reference that lets us speak around kind of, um, in a much more consistent way. The second aspect is for, to me is for, um, these concepts to start to be embraced, not just by us or trying, or, you know, vendors, um, system integrators, consulting firms, educators, thought leaders, but also for some of our old customers to start to become evangelists of their own in the industry. >>So we, our, our objective with the coalition needs to be pretty, pretty broad. Um, and our hope is by, by starting to basically educate, um, our, our joint customers or partners, that we can start to really foster these behaviors and start to really change, uh, some of dynamics. So we're very pleased at if you look at, uh, some of the companies which have joined the, the, the, the manifesto. Um, so we have vendors and suggest desktop or advance, or, um, uh, PagerDuty for instance, or even planned view, uh, one of my direct competitors, um, but also thought leaders like Tom Davenport or, uh, or cap Gemini or, um, um, smaller firms like, uh, business agility, institutes, or agility elf. Um, and so our, our goal really is to start to bring together, uh, thought leaders, people who have been LP, larger organizations do digital transformation vendors, were providing the technologies that many of these organizations use to deliver on these digital preservation and for all of us to start to provide the kind of, uh, education support and tools that the industry needs. Yeah, >>That's great surge. And, uh, you know, congratulations to you and the team. I know this has been going on for a while, putting all this together, getting people to sign onto the manifesto, putting the coalition together, and finally today getting to unveil it to the world in a little bit more of a public, uh, opportunity. So again, you know, really good values, really simple principles, something that, that, uh, shouldn't have to be written down, but it's nice cause it is, and now you can print it out and stick it on your wall. So thank you for, uh, for sharing this story. And again, congrats to you and the team. Thank you. Appreciate it. My pleasure. Alrighty, surge. If you want to learn more about the biz ops, Manifesta go to biz ops manifesto.org, read it, and you can sign it and you can stay here for more coverage. I'm the cube of the biz ops manifesto unveiled. Thanks for watching. See you next time >>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of this ops manifesto unveiled and brought to you by >>This obstacle volition. Hey, welcome back, everybody Jeffrey here with the cube. Welcome back to our ongoing coverage of the biz ops manifesto unveiling. It's been in the works for awhile, but today's the day that it actually kind of come out to the, to the public. And we're excited to have a real industry luminary here to talk about what's going on, why this is important and share his perspective. And we're happy to have from Cape Cod, I believe is Tom Davenport. He's a distinguished author and professor at Babson college. We could go on, he's got a lot of great titles and, and really illuminary in the area of big data and analytics Thomas. Great to see you. >>Thanks Jeff. Happy to be here with you. >>Great. So let's just jump into it, you know, and getting ready for this. I came across your LinkedIn posts. I think you did earlier this summer in June and right off the bat, the first sentence just grabbed my attention. I'm always interested in new attempts to address longterm issues, uh, in how technology works within businesses, biz ops. What did you see in biz ops, uh, that, that kind of addresses one of these really big longterm problems? >>Well, yeah, but the longterm problem is that we've had a poor connection between business people and it people between business objectives and the, it solutions that address them. This has been going on, I think since the beginning of information technology and sadly it hasn't gone away. And so biz ops is a new attempt to deal with that issue with a, you know, a new framework, eventually a broad set of solutions that increase the likelihood that will actually solve a business problem with an it capability. >>Right. You know, it's interesting to compare it with like dev ops, which I think a lot of people are probably familiar with, which was, you know, built around, uh, agile software development and a theory that we want to embrace change that that changes. Okay. And we want to be able to iterate quickly and incorporate that. And that's been happening in the software world for, for 20 plus years. What's taken so long to get that to the business side, because as the pace of change has changed on the software side, you know, that's a strategic issue in terms of execution, the business side that they need now to change priorities. And, you know, there's no PRDs and MRDs and big, giant strategic plans that sit on the shelf for five years. That's just not the way business works anymore. It took a long time to get here. >>Yeah, it did. And, you know, there had been previous attempts to make a better connection between business and it, there was the so called strategic alignment framework that a couple of friends of mine from Boston university developed, I think more than 20 years ago, but you know, now we have better technology for creating that linkage. And the, you know, the idea of kind of ops oriented frameworks is pretty pervasive now. So I think it's time for another serious attempt at it. >>And do you think doing it this way, right. With the, with the BizOps coalition, you know, getting a collection of, of, of kind of likeminded individuals and companies together, and actually even having a manifesto, which we're making this declarative statement of, of principles and values, you think that's what it takes to kind of drive this kind of beyond the experiment and actually, you know, get it done and really start to see some results in, in, uh, in production in the field. >>I think certainly no one vendor organization can pull this off single handedly. It does require a number of organizations collaborating and working together. So I think our coalition is a good idea and a manifesto is just a good way to kind of lay out what you see as the key principles of the idea. And that makes it much easier for everybody to understand and act on. >>I, I think it's just, it's really interesting having, you know, having them written down on paper and having it just be so clearly articulated both in terms of the, of the values as well as, as the, uh, the principles and the values, you know, business outcomes matter trust and collaboration, data-driven decisions, which is the number three of four, and then learn, respond and pivot. It doesn't seem like those should have to be spelled out so clearly, but, but obviously it helps to have them there. You can stick them on the wall and kind of remember what your priorities are, but you're the data guy. You're the analytics guy, uh, and a big piece of this is data and analytics and moving to data driven decisions. And principle number seven says, you know, today's organizations generate more data than humans can process and informed decisions can be augmented by machine learning and artificial intelligence right up your alley. You know, you've talked a number of times on kind of the mini stages of analytics. Um, and how has that evolved over over time, you know, as you think of analytics and machine learning, driving decisions beyond supporting decisions, but actually starting to make decisions in machine time. What's that, what's that thing for you? What does that make you, you know, start to think, wow, this is this going to be pretty significant. >>Yeah. Well, you know, this has been a longterm interest of mine. Um, the last generation of AI, I was very interested in expert systems. And then, um, I think, uh, more than 10 years ago, I wrote an article about automated decision-making using what was available then, which was rule-based approaches. Um, but you know, this addresses an issue that we've always had with analytics and AI. Um, you know, we, we tended to refer to those things as providing decision support, but the problem is that if the decision maker didn't want their support, didn't want to use them in order to make a decision, they didn't provide any value. And so the nice thing about automating decisions, um, with now contemporary AI tools is that we can ensure that data and analytics get brought into the decision without any possible disconnection. Now, I think humans still have something to add here, and we often will need to examine how that decision is being made and maybe even have the ability to override it. But in general, I think at least for, you know, repetitive tactical decisions, um, involving a lot of data, we want most of those, I think to be at least, um, recommended if not totally made by an algorithm or an AI based system. And that I believe would add to, um, the quality and the precision and the accuracy of decisions and in most organizations, >>No, I think, I think you just answered my next question before I, before I asked it, you know, we had dr. Robert Gates on the former secretary of defense on a few years back, and we were talking about machines and machines making decisions. And he said at that time, you know, the only weapon systems, uh, that actually had an automated trigger on it were on the North Korea and South Korea border. Um, everything else, as you said, had to go through a sub person before the final decision was made. And my question is, you know, what are kind of the attributes of the decision that enable us to more easily automated? And then how do you see that kind of morphing over time, both as the data to support that as well as our comfort level, um, enables us to turn more and more actual decisions over to the machine? >>Well, yeah, as I suggested we need, um, data and the data that we have to kind of train our models has to be high quality and current, and we need to know the outcomes of that data. You know, um, most machine learning models, at least in business are supervised. And that means we need to have labeled outcomes in the, in the training data. But I, you know, um, the pandemic that we're living through is a good illustration of the fact that, that the data also have to be reflective of current reality. And, you know, one of the things that we're finding out quite frequently these days is that, um, the data that we have do not reflect, you know, what it's like to do business in a pandemic. Um, I wrote a little piece about this recently with Jeff cam at wake forest university, we call it data science quarantined, and we interviewed with somebody who said, you know, it's amazing what eight weeks of zeros will do to your demand forecast. We just don't really know what happens in a pandemic. Um, our models maybe have to be put on the shelf for a little while and until we can develop some new ones or we can get some other guidelines into making decisions. So I think that's one of the key things with automated decision making. We have to make sure that the data from the past and that's all we have of course, is a good guide to, you know, what's happening in the present and the future as far as we understand it. >>Yeah. I used to joke when we started this calendar year 2020, it was finally the year that we know everything with the benefit of hindsight, but I turned down 20, 20 a year. We found out we actually know nothing and everything and thought we knew, but I want to, I want to follow up on that because you know, it did suddenly change everything, right? We've got this light switch moment. Everybody's working from home now we're many, many months into it, and it's going to continue for a while. I saw your interview with Bernard Marr and you had a really interesting comment that now we have to deal with this change. We don't have a lot of data and you talked about hold fold or double down. And, and I can't think of a more, you know, kind of appropriate metaphor for driving the value of the biz ops when now your whole portfolio strategy, um, these to really be questioned and, and, you know, you have to be really, uh, well, uh, executing on what you are, holding, what you're folding and what you're doubling down with this completely new environment. >>Well, yeah, and I hope I did this in the interview. I would like to say that I came up with that term, but it actually came from a friend of mine. Who's a senior executive at Genpact. And, um, I, um, used it mostly to talk about AI and AI applications, but I think you could, you could use it much more broadly to talk about your entire sort of portfolio of digital projects. You need to think about, well, um, given some constraints on resources and a difficult economy for a while, which of our projects do we want to keep going on pretty much the way we were and which ones are not that necessary anymore? You see a lot of that in AI, because we had so many pilots, somebody told me, you know, we've got more pilots around here than O'Hare airport and, and AI. Um, and then, but the ones that involve doubled down, they're even more important to you. They are, you know, a lot of organizations have found this out, um, in the pandemic on digital projects, it's more and more important for customers to be able to interact with you, um, digitally. And so you certainly wouldn't want to cancel those projects or put them on hold. So you double down on them and get them done faster and better. Right, >>Right. Uh, another, another thing that came up in my research that, that you quoted, um, was, was from Jeff Bezos, talking about the great bulk of what we do is quietly, but meaningfully improving core operations. You know, I think that is so core to this concept of not AI and machine learning and kind of the general sense, which, which gets way too much buzz, but really applied right. Applied to a specific problem. And that's where you start to see the value. And, you know, the, the BizOps, uh, manifesto is, is, is calling it out in this particular process. But I'd love to get your perspective as you know, you speak generally about this topic all the time, but how people should really be thinking about where are the applications where I can apply this technology to get direct business value. >>Yeah, well, you know, even talking about automated decisions, um, uh, the kind of once in a lifetime decisions, uh, the ones that, um, ag Lafley, the former CEO of Procter and gamble used to call the big swing decisions. You only get a few of those. He said in your tenure as CEO, those are probably not going to be the ones that you're automating in part because, um, you don't have much data about them. You're only making them a few times and in part, because, um, they really require that big picture thinking and the ability to kind of anticipate the future, that the best human decision makers, um, have. Um, but, um, in general, I think where they, I, the projects that are working well are, you know, what I call the low hanging fruit ones, the, some people even report to it referred to it as boring AI. >>So, you know, sucking data out of a contract in order to compare it to a bill of lading for what arrived at your supply chain companies can save or make a lot of money with that kind of comparison. It's not the most exciting thing, but AI, as you suggested is really good at those narrow kinds of tasks. It's not so good at the, at the really big moonshots, like curing cancer or, you know, figuring out well what's the best stock or bond under all or even autonomous vehicles. Um, we, we made some great progress in that area, but everybody seems to agree that they're not going to be perfect for quite a while, and we really don't want to be driving around on, um, and then very much unless they're, you know, good and all kinds of weather and with all kinds of pedestrian traffic and you know, that sort of thing, right? >>That's funny you bring up contract management. I had a buddy years ago, they had a startup around contract management and I've like, and this was way before we had the compute power today and cloud proliferation. I said, you know, how can you possibly build software around contract management? It's language, it's legal, ease. It's very specific. And he's like, Jeff, we just need to know where's the contract. And when does it expire? And who's the signatory. And he built a business on those, you know, very simple little facts that weren't being covered because their contracts are in people's drawers and files and homes. And Lord only knows. So it's really interesting, as you said, these kind of low hanging fruit opportunities where you can extract a lot of business value without trying to, you know, boil the ocean. >>Yeah. I mean, if you're Amazon, um, uh, Jeff Bezos thinks it's important to have some kind of billion dollar project. And he even says it's important to have a billion dollar failure or two every year. But I think most organizations probably are better off being a little less aggressive and, you know, sticking to, um, what AI has been doing for a long time, which is, you know, making smarter decisions based on, based on data. >>Right? So Tom, I want to shift gears one more time before, before we let you go on, on kind of a new topic for you, not really new, but you know, not, not a, the vast majority of, of your publications and that's the new way to work, you know, as, as the pandemic hit in mid March, right. And we had this light switch moment, everybody had to work from home and it was, you know, kind of crisis and get everybody set up. Well, you know, now we're five months, six months, seven months. A number of companies have said that people are not going to be going back to work for a while. And so we're going to continue on this for a while. And then even when it's not what it is now, it's not going to be what it was before. So, you know, I wonder, and I know you, you, uh, you teased, you're working on a new book, you know, some of your thoughts on, you know, kind of this new way to work and, and, and the human factors in this new, this new kind of reality that we're kind of evolving into, I guess. >>Yeah. I missed was an interest of mine. I think, um, back in the nineties, I wrote an article called, um, a coauthored, an article called two cheers for the virtual office. And, you know, it was just starting to emerge. Then some people were very excited about it. Some people were skeptical and, uh, we said two cheers rather than three cheers because clearly there's some shortcomings. And, you know, I keep seeing these pop up. It's great that we can work from our homes. It's great that we can, most of what we need to do with a digital interface, but, um, you know, things like innovation and creativity, and certainly, um, uh, a good, um, happy social life kind of requires some face to face contact every now and then. And so I, you know, I think we'll go back to an environment where there is some of that. >>Um, we'll have, um, times when people convene in one place so they can get to know each other face to face and learn from each other that way. And most of the time, I think it's a huge waste of people's time to commute into the office every day and to jump on airplanes, to, to, um, give every little, um, uh, sales call or give every little presentation. Uh, we just have to really narrow down what are the circumstances where face to face contact really matters. And when can we get by with digital? You know, I think one of the things in my current work I'm finding is that even when you have AI based decision making, you really need a good platform in which that all takes place. So in addition to these virtual platforms, we need to develop platforms that kind of structure the workflow for us and tell us what we should be doing next, then make automated decisions when necessary. And I think that ultimately is a big part of biz ops as well. It's not just the intelligence of an AI system, but it's the flow of work that kind of keeps things moving smoothly throughout your organization. >>I think such, such a huge opportunity as you just said, cause I forget the stats on how often we're interrupted with notifications between email texts, Slack, a sauna, Salesforce, the list goes on and on. So, you know, to put an AI layer between the person and all these systems that are begging for attention, you've written a book on the attention economy, which is a whole nother topic, we'll say for another day, you know, it, it really begs, it really begs for some assistance because you know, you just can't get him picked, you know, every two minutes and really get quality work done. It's just not, it's just not realistic. And you know what? I don't think that's a feature that we're looking for. >>I agree. Totally >>Tom. Well, thank you so much for your time. Really enjoyed the conversation. I got to dig into the library. It's very long. So I might start at the attention economy. I haven't read that one. And to me, I think that's the fascinating thing in which we're living. So thank you for your time and, uh, great to see you. >>My pleasure, Jeff. Great to be here. >>All right. He's Tom I'm Jeff. You are watching the continuing coverage of the biz ops manifesto and Vail. Thanks for watching the cube. We'll see you next time.
SUMMARY :
a BizOps manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. Good to see you again. And I think you said you're at a fun, exotic place on the East coast Great to see you again, where are you coming in from? you know, you can do better stuff within your own company, surge, why don't we start with you? whether we're talking about vendors or, um, you know, system integrators, consulting firms are talking And I think we got a lot of improvement at the team level, and I think as satisfies noted, I wonder if you could kind of share your And in general, I think, you know, we've just kind of optimized that to narrow for a long time and it's been, you know, kind of trucking along and then covert hit and Um, but, but yet when we look at large enterprises, And not surprisingly, you know, And, you know, we talk about people process and we, we realized that to be successful with any kind of digital transformation you If we build it, they won't necessarily come. So I wonder if you can just share your thoughts on, you know, using flow as a way to think You need to optimize how you innovate and how you deliver value to the business and the customer. And I'm gonna back to you Tom, on that to follow up. And, um, you know, it's, it's a difficult aspect or you frame it as an either or situation where you could actually have some of both, but if the culture doesn't adopt it and people don't feel good about it, you know, it's not going to be successful and that's We start to enable these different stakeholders to not debate the data. the best examples I have is if you start to be able to align business And so you really want to start And, you know, what are the factors that are making flow from, uh, you know, the digital native, um, Um, so you know, is the, is the big data I'm just going to use that generically you know, at some point maybe we reached the stage where we don't do anything and taking the lessons from agile, you know, what's been the inhibitor to stop this And that will help you that value flow without interruptions. And, you know, there's probably never been a more important time than now to make sure that your prioritization is We'll see you next time of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. We're in our Palo Alto studios, and we'd like to welcome you back to Yeah, it's great to be here. The biz ops manifesto, why the biz ops coalition now when you guys And it's, you know, I really applaud this whole movement. I mean, whether, you know, I never sit down and say, you know, the product management team has to get aligned with Maybe trying to eliminate the word alignment, you know, from a lot of our organizations, Um, the ones that, that jumps out though is really about, you know, change, you know, it's kind of a, now an analogy for transformation. instituting the whole program, implement, you know, the program, increment planning, capabilities, kind of model is, um, and also, uh, you know, on that shorter increment, to really kind of just put them down on paper and, you know, I can't help, but think of, So, um, you know, you really, I think we've attacked that in a variety And so when we pie plan, you know, myself and Cameron and the other members of our leadership, So they can, you know, quickly ship code that works. mixed book, you know, it was a great piece on a, you're talking to Mick, you know, as part of the manifesto is right, I mean, we run product management models, you know, with software development teams, But th the sudden, you know, light switch moment, everybody had to go work from home and in March 15th And we kind of, you know, when we started with John and built, you know, out of concentric circles of momentum and, I think COVID, you know, to get behind these, but if it takes, you know, something a little bit more formal, uh, And I think it's a very analogous, you know, even if you don't like what the, even if you can argue against the math, behind the measurement, It's great to be here. And if you want to check out the biz ops, Manifesta go to biz of biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. or excited to have some of the foundational people that, you know, have put their, put their name on the dotted, It's good to be close to the U S and it's going to have the Arabic cleaner as well. there at Xerox park, you know, some of the lessons you learned and what you've been able to kind of carry forward And of course there's as, as you know, uh, there's just this DNA of innovation and excitement And I realized none of this was really working in that there was something else, So, you know, the agile movement got started about 20 years ago, And the way that the business was working was planning was investing the right measurement data sets so that you can make the right decisions in terms of what you're investing, different from the way that you measure business outcomes. And it's really interesting to me cause I know, you know, flow on one hand is kind of a workflow did the customer go to the feature and how quickly did you learn and how quickly did you use that data to drive to you increase flow to the customer. And, you know, I love that, you know, took this approach really of having kind of four So really the key thing is, is to move away from those old ways of doing things, So these things do seem, you know, very obvious when you look at them. but the real power, I think in Moore's laws is the attitudinal change in terms of working in a world where you And you also make it sound so simple, but again, if you don't have the data driven visibility as we see with the tech giants, you actually can both lower your costs and you know, you have to constantly be delivering value and upgrading that value because you're constantly taking money as well as the flow frame of touch on is if you can't measure how much value you deliver to a customer, And you can go on and on and on. if you can model your value streams, so you actually understand how you're innovating, you know, more senior people being overloaded and creating bottlenecks where they didn't exist. Well, you know, what's the biggest inhibitor for most So I think you can reach out to us through the website, uh, for the manifesto. continue to spread that well, uh, you know, good for you through the book and through your company. Thanks so much for having me, Jeff. They'd love to have you do it. a biz ops manifesto unveiled brought to you by biz ops coalition. It's the biz ops manifesto manifesto unveil. Jeff Frick here with the cube come to you from our Palo Alto studios today for a big, Glad to be here. What is the biz ops manifesto? years later, and if you look at the current state of the industry of the product, you know, providing them with support, but also tools and consulting that is of COVID, which, you know, came along unexpectedly. Um, and you know, if you go back to, uh, I think you'll unmask a And the reality is that if you look at it, especially in the last decade, I just liked that you put down these really simple, you know, kind of straightforward core values. And you see that every day. And yet, um, you know, the it teams, whether it's operation software environments were And there's a good ROI when you talk about, you know, companies not measuring the right thing. kind of a base data as to who is doing what, uh, um, And so if you start to think about quality as fitness for purpose, And so, you know, if I'm, But I want to talk about, you know, one of the key ones, which you just talked about, of the speed of change and, and, and, and making that, you know, And if I remember correctly over 80% of the it executives set that the Um, and you know, we, we talk about kind of this, Why the coalition, why, you know, take these concepts out to a broader audience, all of us, whether we're talking about, you know, consulting agile transformation experts, So we're very pleased at if you look at, And, uh, you know, congratulations to you and the team. of this ops manifesto unveiled and brought to you by It's been in the works for awhile, but today's the day that it actually kind of come out to the, So let's just jump into it, you know, and getting ready for this. deal with that issue with a, you know, a new framework, eventually a broad set get that to the business side, because as the pace of change has changed on the software side, you know, And the, you know, With the, with the BizOps coalition, you know, getting a collection of, and a manifesto is just a good way to kind of lay out what you see as the key principles Um, and how has that evolved over over time, you know, I think at least for, you know, repetitive tactical decisions, And my question is, you know, what are kind of the attributes of of course, is a good guide to, you know, what's happening in the present and the future these to really be questioned and, and, you know, you have to be really, uh, and AI applications, but I think you could, you could use it much more broadly to talk about your you know, you speak generally about this topic all the time, but how people should really be thinking about where you know, what I call the low hanging fruit ones, the, some people even report to it referred of weather and with all kinds of pedestrian traffic and you know, that sort of thing, And he built a business on those, you know, very simple little what AI has been doing for a long time, which is, you know, making smarter decisions And we had this light switch moment, everybody had to work from home and it was, you know, kind of crisis and get everybody And so I, you know, I think we'll go back to an environment where there is some of And most of the time, I think it's a huge waste of people's time to commute on the attention economy, which is a whole nother topic, we'll say for another day, you know, I agree. So thank you for your time We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Patrick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Charles | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cameron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lucio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Davenport | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thomas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ITA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
five months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cape Cod | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Canada | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
March 15th | DATE | 0.99+ |
99 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kirsten | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jeff Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Terry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vancouver | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Genpact | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Harvard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one hour | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
16% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
77% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
10 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second layer | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Clayton Christianson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two decades | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
20 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bob Evans, Cloud Wars Media | Citrix Cloud Summit 2020
>> Woman: From theCube studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is theCube conversation. >> Hey, welcome back everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCube coming to you from our Palo Alto studios to have a Cube conversation with a real leader in the industry he's been publishing for a long, long time. I've been following him in social media. First time I've ever get the met in person and kind of a virtual COVID 20, 20 way. And we're excited to welcome into the studio. Bob Evans. He's a founder and principal analyst, the Cloud Wars Media coming to us. Bob where are you coming to us from today? >> In Pittsburgh today. Jeff. Good to see you. >> Awesome. Pittsburgh Pennsylvania. There's a lot of Fricks in Pittsburgh Pennsylvania cause Henry Clay was there many moons ago so that's a good town. So welcome. >> Thank you, Jeff. Thanks. Great to be here. And I look forward to our conversation. >> Absolutely. So let's, let's jump into it. So I know you attended today, the Citrix Cloud Summit you know, we've covered Citrix energy in the past this year, they decided to go we'll obviously virtual like everybody did but they, you know, they did something a little creative I think as, and they broke it into pieces, which, which I think is the way of the future. There's no reason to necessarily aggregate all of your news, all of your customer stuff, all your customer appreciation, the party the partners, all for three days in Vegas. Cause that's the only time you could get the Science Convention Center. So today was the Cloud Summit all day long. First off, just, you know, your general impressions of the event, >> Jeff, you know, I just thought that the guys had hit a really good note about what's going on in the outside world. You know, sometimes I think it's a little awkward when tech companies come in and the first thing they want to talk about is themselves, which I guess in some ways fine but I think the Citrix guys did a really good job at coming outside in here's what's going on in the outside world. Here's how we as a technology player trying to adapt to that and deliver the maximum value to our customers in this time of unprecedented change. So I thought they really nailed that with cloud and some of the other big topics that they laid out >> Great. And you've been covering cloud for a long time and, and you know, COVID is, we're still in it. There's a lot of really bad things that are happening. There's hundreds of thousands of people that are dying and a lot of businesses are getting crushed especially hospitality, travel you know, anything that relies on an aggregation of people. Conversely though we're, we're fortunate to be in the IT industry and in the information industry. And for a lot of industries, it's actually been kind of an accelerant. And one of the main accelerants is this, you know kind of digital transformation and new way to work. And some of these things that were initiatives in play but on March 15th, approximately it was go, right? It was Light switch no more planning, no more talking, it's here now. Ready, set, go. And it's in, you know, Citrix is in a pretty good position in terms of the products that they offer, the services that they offer, the customer base that they have to take advantage of that opportunity and, and you know, go to this, we've all seen the social media memes right? Who's driving your digital transformation the CEO, the CIO, or COVID. And we all know what the answer to the question is. They're pretty well positioned and it seems like, you know, they're doing a good job kind of doubling down on the opportunity. >> Jeff. Yeah. And I'd sure echo your, your initial point there about the nightmare that everybody's experienced over the last six or seven months. There's, there's no way around that yet. It has forced in these categories like, you know, that we've all heard hundreds of thousand time digital transformation to the point where the term almost becomes a cliche but in fact right? You know, it has become something that's really you know, one of the driving forces, touching everybody in the planet, right? There's, and I think digital transformation. Isn't so much about the technology, of course but it's because, you know, there's a couple billion people around the world who want to live digitally enhanced digitally driven lifestyles. And the pandemic only accelerated that as you said. So it triggered things you know, in our personal lives and our new set of requirements and expectations sort of rippled up to the B2C companies and from them back up to the B2B companies So every company on earth, every industry has had to do this. And like you said, if they were, deluding themselves maybe telling themselves these different companies that yeah, we're going fast, we're aggressive. Well, when this thing hit earlier this year as you said, they just had to really slam their foot down. I think that David Henshall from Citrix said that they had some companies that had, they were compressing three years into five months or he said in some cases even weeks. So it's really been extraordinary. And cloud has been the vehicle for these companies to get over into their digital future. >> Right. And let's talk about that for a minute because you know, Moore's law is my favorite law that nobody knows which was, you know, we tend to underestimate, excuse me we tend to overestimate the impact of technology in the short term of specific technology and underestimate the longterm impact. You know, Gardener kind of uses a similar thing with the hype cycle. And then you know, the thing goes at the end, you know, had COVID hit five years ago, 10 years ago, 15 years ago you know, the ease in which the information workers were able to basically just not show up and turn on their computer at home and have access to most of their tools and most of the security and most of their applications that wasn't even possible. So it's a really interesting, you know, just validation on the enabler that we are actually able to not go to work on Tuesday the 16th or whatever the day was. And for the most part, you know, get most of our work done. >> Yeah. Yeah. Jeff, you know, I've thought about it a lot over the last several months. Remember the big consultant companies used to try to do these measures of technology and they'd always come out and say, well, we've done all these studies. And despite the billions of dollars of investment we can't show that IT has actually boosted productivity or, you know, delivered an ROI that customers should be happy with. I was always puzzled by some of the things that went into those. But I would say that today over these last six or seven months to your point, we have seen extraordinary validation of these investments in technology broadly. But specifically I think some of these things that are happening with the cloud, you know, as you've said how fast some companies have been able to do this and then not remarkable thing, Jeff right. About human nature. And we hear a lot about in, in when companies change that relative to changing human behavior changing technology is somewhat easy but you try to change human behavior and it's wicked. Well, we had this highly motivating force behind it, of the pandemic. So you had a desire on the part of people to change. And as you pointed out, there's also this corresponding thing of, you know, the technology was here. It was right. You've got a fast number of companies delivering some extraordinary solutions. And, you know, I thought it was interesting. I think it was a Kirsten Kliphouse from Google cloud. One of Citrix's partners who said that we're two best of breed companies, Citrix and Google cloud. So I thought that, that coming from Google you know, that is very high praise. So again, I think the guys at Citrix are sort of coming into this at the right time with the right set of outside in-approaches and having that flexibility to say that we're moving into territory nobody's ever been both been in before. So we better be able to move as fast as possible. >> Right. Right. And, and just to keep going down the quote line, you know once everyone is taken care of and you, you deal with the health and safety of your people which is a number one, right? The other thing is the great Winston Churchill quote which has never let a good crisis go to waste. And I think you know, David talked about in that, in his keynote that this is an opportunity, He said to challenge assumptions, challenge the models of the past. So, you know get beyond the technology discussion and use this really as a catalyst to rethink the way that you do things. And, you know, I think it's a really interesting moment because there is no model right? There is no, there is no formula for how do you reopen, there was no playbook for how do you shut down? You know, it was, everybody's figuring it out. And you've got kind of all these concurrent processes happening at the same time as everyone tries to figure it out and come to solutions. But clearly, you know, the path to, to leverage as much as you can, is the cloud and the flexibility of the cloud and, you know the ability to, to expand, add more applications. And so, you know, Citrix again, right place, right time right. Solution, but also you know, taking an aggressive tact to take advantage of this opportunity, both in taking care of their customers, but really it's a real great opportunity for them to change a little bit. >> It is. And Jeff, you know, I think if I could just piggyback on you know, your, your guy there Winston Churchill, one of his other quotes, I love it too. And he said, if find yourself crawling through hell, keep going. And I think so many companies have really had to do that now. It's, it's not ideal. It's not maybe the way they plan it but this is the reality we're facing here in 2020 and a couple of things right? I think it requires a new type of leadership within the customer companies right? What, how the CEO gets engaged in saying, I, I'm not going to relegate this to the CIO for this to happen and something else to the CMO. They've got to be front and center on this because people are pretty smart. And then the heightened sensitivity that everybody in every business has around the world today if you think your CEO is just paying lip service to this stuff about digital transformation and all these changes that everybody's going to make, the people aren't going to buy into it. So you've got the leadership thing happening on the one side and into that it's not a vacuum, but into that void or that opportunity of this unprecedented space that you mentioned come the smart, capable forward-looking technology companies that are less concerned with the stuff that they've dragged along with them for years or decade or more. But instead of trying to say, what is the new stuff that people are going to be desperately in need of and how can I help these customers do things that they never did before? It's going to require me as a tech company to do stuff that I've never done before. So I, I've just been really inspired by seeing a lot of the tech companies doing what they are helping their customers to do which is take a product development cycle, look at all the new stuff that came out around COVID and back to work, workspaces. And so on what Citrix, you know others are doing like this, the product development cycles Jeff, you study this stuff closely. It's, it's almost unimaginable. If you had said that somebody within three months within two months, we're going to have a new suite of product available we would have said it just, it's not possible the nice idea but it can't work, but that's happening now, right? >> Yeah. Isn't it interesting that had you asked them on March 10th, they would have told you it's not possible. And by March 20th, they were doing it. >> Yeah. >> At scale, huge companies. And to your point, I think that the good news is they had kind of their own companies to eat their own dog food and get their own employees you know, working from home and then, you know, bake that into the way that they had their go to market. But let's talk a little bit more specifically about work from home or work from anywhere or the new way to work. And it's funny cause that's been bantered about for, for way too long, but now, now it's here. And most indications are that for many people, many companies are saying you're not going to go back for a while. And even when you do go back it's going to be a lot different. So, you know, the new way to work is really important. And there's so much that goes into that. And one of the big pieces that I'm encouraged to hear is how do you measure work? And, you know, there's a great line I heard where, you know work is an output. It's not a place to go. And, you know, I had Martin Michaelson early on in this thing, and he had the great line, you know it's so easy to fake it at work, you know, just look busy and walk around and go to all the meetings where with a work from home or work from anywhere. What the leadership needs to do is, is a couple of things. One, is measure output right? Not activity. And you know, it's great. People can have dinner with their family or go see the kid's baseball game. Or I guess they don't have a baseball games right now but, you know, measure output, not activity which is, doesn't seem to be that revolutionary. But I think it kind of is. And, and then the other thing is really be an enabler and be a, an unblocker for people in terms of a leadership role right? Get out, help get stuff out of the way. And, but unfortunately, the counter is, you know how many apps does a normal person have to interact with every day? And how many notifications do those apps fire off every day between Slack and Asana and Salesforce and, and texts and tweets and everything else. You know, I think there's a real opportunity to take a whole nother level of productivity improvement by removing these, these silly distractions automating, you know, as much of the crap away as we can to enable people to use their brains and have some quiet time and think about things and deliver much better value than this constant reaction to nonstop notifications. >> Yeah. Yeah. Jeff, you know, I loved your point there about the difference between people's outlook on March 10th versus on March 20th. And I believe that, you know, all limitations are self-imposed, right? We tend to form constructs around how we think and allow those then to shape and often restrict or confine our behavior. And here's an example of the CEO of Novartis Pharmaceutical Company. He said, we have been brought up in the pharmaceutical industry to believe that it is immutable law of physics that it's going to take 12 and a half years and two and a half billion dollars to get a new drug approved. And he said in the past with the technology and the processes and the capabilities that that was true it is not true today yet too often, the pharmaceutical industries behave like those external limitations are put in there. So flip that over to one of the customers that, that was at the Citrix Cloud Summit today Jim Noga, who's the CIO at Mass General Brigham. I thought it was remarkable what he said when you asked about how are things going with this work from home? Well, Jim Noga the CIO there said that we had been averaging before COVID 9,000 virtual visits a month. And he said since then that number has gone up to a quarter of a million virtual visits a month or it's 8,000 a day. So they're doing an a day what they used to do in a month. Like, you said it, you tell them that on March 10th, they're not going to believe it but March 20th, it started to become reality. So I think for the customers, they're going to be more drawn to companies that are willing to say, I see your need. I see how fast you want to move. I see where you need to go and do things you never did before. I'm willing to lock elbows with you, and go in on that. And the tech number is that sort of sit back and say, ah well, I'd like to help you there, but that's not what I do. They're going to get destroyed. They're going to get blown out. And I think over the next year or two, we're going to see this massive forcing function in the tech industry. That's going to separate the companies that are able to move at the pace of market and keep up with their customers versus those that are trapped by their past or by their legacy. And it is, going to be a fascinating talk. >> So I throw on a follow up to make sure I understand that number. Those are patient visits per unit time. >> Yeah. At Mass Brigham. So he said 9,000 virtual visits a month is what they're averaging before COVID. He said, now we're up to 250,000 virtual visits per month. >> Wow. >> So it's 8,000 a day. >> Wow. I mean the thing that highlights to me, Bob, and the fact that we're doing this right now, and none of us had to get on an airplane is, you know, I think when people think back or sit back and look at what does this enable? right? What does digital enable? Instead of saying instead of focusing what we can't do, like we can't go out and get a cup of coffee after this is over and we can't and that would be great and we'd have a good time but conversely, there's so many new things that you can do right? And you can reach so many more people than you could physically. And, and for like, you know, events like the one today. And, you know, we cover events all the time. So many more people can attend if they don't have the expense, of flying to Vegas and they don't have to leave the shop or, you know, whatever the limitations are. And we're seeing massive increases in registrants for virtual events, massive increase in new registrants. Who've never attended the, the events before. So I think he really brings up a good point, which is, you know, focus on what you can do and which is a whole new opportunity a whole new space, if you will, as opposed to continuing to whine about the things that we can't do because we can't do anything about those anyway >> No, and you know, that old line of a wish in one hand and spit in the other and see which one fills up first (laughs) you know, one of the other guests that that was on the Cloud Summit today Jeff, I don't know if you got to see 'em, but Steve Shute from SAP who heads up their entire 40,000 person customer success organization he said this about Citrix. "Citrix workspace is the foundation to provide secure cloud based access for this new generation of remote workers." So you get companies like SAP, and, you know, you want to talk about somebody that has earned its way into the, you know the biggest companies in the world and how they go along. You know, it's pretty powerful. They end up, your point Jeff, about how things have changed, focus on what we can do. The former CEO of SAP, Bill McDermott. He recently said, we think of phones as, you know, devices that help us be more productive. We think of computers as devices that help us be more productive. He said, now the world's going to start thinking of the office or the headquarters. It's a productivity tool. That's all it is. It's not the place that measures Hey, he was only at work, four days today. So, you know, he didn't really contribute. It's going to be a productivity tool. So we're going to look at a lot of concepts and just flip them upside down what they meant in February. Isn't going to to mean that much after this incredible change that we've all been through. >> Right. Right. Another big theme I wanted to touch base with you on it was very evident at the at the show today was multicloud right and hybrid cloud. And, you know, I used to work for Oracle in, in the day. And you know Amazon really changed the game in, in public cloud. The greatest line, one of Jeff's best lines is you know, we had seven year headstart. Nobody even was paying attention to the small book seller in Seattle and they completely changed enterprise technology. But what came across today pretty clearly right? As horses for courses, and really focusing at the application first right? The workload first and where that thing runs and how that thing runs, can be any place in that in a large organization you know, this is pick an airline or, or a big bank right? They're going to have stuff running at Oracle. They're going to have stuff running at AWS. They're going to have stuff running on Google. They're going to to have stuff running in Azure. They're going to have stuff running in their data center. IBM cloud, Ali Baba. I mean there's restrictions for location and, and data sovereigncy and all these things that are driving it. And really, you know, kind of drives this concept where the concept of cloud is kind of simple but the actual execution day to day at the enterprise level and managing and keeping track of this stuff, it is definitely a multicloud hybrid cloud. Pick your, pick your, your adjective but it's definitely not a single cloud world. That's for sure. >> Yeah. Yeah. And Jeff, you know, the Citrix customer that I mentioned earlier, Jim Noga is that the CIO at mass General Brigham, one of the other points he made about this was he said he's been very pleased about some of the contributions that cloud has made in, in, in his hospital organizations, you know transformation, what they've been able today and all the new things that they're capable of doing now that they were not people poor. But he said, you know, cloud is a tool. He said, it's not Nirvana. It's not a place for everything. He said, we have some on-premises systems. He said, they're more valuable now than they were a couple of years ago. And then we've got edge devices and we have something else over here. He said, so I think his point was it's important to put the proper value on cloud for all the things it can do for a specific organization, but not the thing that it's a panacea for everything though, big fan, but also a realist about it. >> Great. >> And so from that to the hybrid stuff and multicloud and I know all the big tech vendors would love it and say Oh no, it's not a multicloud, but just be my cloud. Just, just use my stuff. Everything will be easy, but that's not true. So I think Citrix position itself really well big emphasis on security, big emphasis on the experience that employees need to have. It isn't just sort of like a road war you loose five or seven years ago, as long as he, or she can connect through email and, you know, sending a sales data back and forth, they're all set. Now. It's very different. You've got people sitting in a wildly different environments for, you know, six, eight, 10 hours a day and chunk of an hour or two or three here or there. But that, that seamless experience always dependable, always reliable is just, you know, it can't be compromised. And I just thought you have one you know, high level thought about what happened. It was impressive for me to see that Citrix certainly a fine company put it. It's not one of the biggest tech companies in the world but look at the companies we have, the Microsoft, SAP talking about Google Cloud, AWS, you know, up and down the line. So I just thought it was really impressive how they showed their might as sort of a part of a network effect that is undeniable right now. >> Right. Right. And I think it's driven, you know, we hear over and over right? I mean, co-opertition is a very Silicon Valley thing. And ultimately it's about customer choice and the customer's going to choose you know, kind of by workload, even if you will or by budget as to what they're going to do where so you have to be able to operate in that world or you're going to be you're going to get, you're going to get left out unless you're just super dominant and it's a single application and they built it on you and that's it. But that's not realistic. I want to shift gears a little bit Bob, since I'm so happy to be talking to you on another topic, that's, that's a big mega trend and we're slowly seeing more and more applications. That's machine learning and artificial intelligence and you know, and, and the generic conversations about these remind me of the old big data conversations. It's like okay. So what you know, who cares? It doesn't really matter until you apply it. And with all these new applications and even just around the work from home that we discussed earlier, you know, there's so many opportunities to apply machine learning and AI, to very specific functions and tasks to, again, help people prioritize what they're going to do help people not have to deal with the crap that they shouldn't have to do. And really, you know at a whole another level of, of productivity really, based on a smarter way to help them figure out what am I going to do in my next, my next marginal minute? You know, cause ultimately that's the decision that people make when they're sitting down getting work, done it, how do they do the best work? And I think the AI and machine learning opportunities are gargantuan. >> Jeff. The point you made a few minutes ago about, you know, we tend to overestimate the impact of a new technology in the short term and underestimate it, what it'll be overtime well, we've been doing that with AI for the last 40 years but this is going to be sort of the golden age of it. And one of the reasons why I have been so bullish on cloud is it presents like the perfect delivery system for it. This is we see in medicine, there's sometimes breakthroughs at the laboratory level where they've got the new breakthrough medication but they don't have the bullet. They don't have the delivery system to get it in there, cloud's going to be an accelerator for that. And it gives the tech companies, which and this is going to be very good for customers, every big tech company. Now as a data company, every company says, it's an analytics. Everybody says I'm into AI. Every company says I'm into ML. And in a way that's real good for customers cause the competitive level is going to soar. It's going to bring more choice. As you said, the more customers more types of solutions, more sorts of innovation. And it's also going to be incumbent on those tech vendors. You've got to make it as easy as possible, as fast as possible for these customers to get the benefit of it. I think it was Thomas Kurian, the CEO of Google cloud said, Hey, you know, if, if a shoe company or a retailer or a bank had fantastic expertise in data science, they could go out and hire 200 data scientists do this all themselves. He said, but that's not what they do. And they don't want to do that. >> Right. >> So he said, come to the companies who can do it. And I think that we will see changes in how business works driven by ML and AI, unlike anything that we've ever seen. >> Yeah. >> And that's going to happen over the next 12, 18 months. >> Yeah. Baked into everything. Well, Bob, I really am excited that we finally got to catch up in, in person COVID style. Like I said, I've been following you for a long time. So I just gave you the last word before we sign off. You know, you've been in this business for a long time. You've seen lots and lots of waves. You know, this is just another wave with this, with this, you know, gasoline thrown on the fire with, with COVID in terms of the rate of change. And the, you know there's no more talking, the time to move is now, share kind of your perspective as to kind of where we are. And, you know, we're, we're not that far from flipping the calendar to 2021, which is a good thing you know, as you, as you look forward a little bit you know, what's in your mind, what's getting you excited. What's getting you up in the morning. >> Yeah. Jeff, I guess it comes down to this thing of, we, I think here late in 2020, everybody's got a reason to be pretty proud of what we have done, not only in the last six months but over the last several years, if you look at the improvements that have been made in health care and making it available to more people, in education the things that teenagers or young teenagers or even pre-teenagers can do now to learn and explore the world and communicate with people from all over the globe, there's a lot of great things going on, but I think we're going to look back on this point and say, this was, this was a pivot point here in mid and late 2020, when we stopped letting in some ways, as you described it earlier worrying so much about the things we can't do. And instead put more time into what we can do, what breakthroughs can we make. And I think these things we've talked about with AI and ML are going to be a big part of that, the computer industry or the tech industry, maturing and understanding they're not in charge. It's the customers who are in charge here. And the tech companies have to reorient themselves and reimagine themselves to meet the demands of this new fast changing world. And so I think those are some of the mega trends and more and more Jeff, I think these tech companies are going to say that the customers are demanding that the tech companies give them the gift of speed, give them the gift of engaging with customers in new ways, give them the gift of seeing the world as other people see it rather than just through the narrow lens of, you know sometimes the tech bubble that can percolate somewhere out sometimes out in the Palo Alto area. So I, I'm incredibly optimistic about what the future is going to bring. >> Well, Thank you. Thanks for Bob for sharing your insight. You can follow Bob on Twitter. He's got podcasts, he's very prolific writer and again, really, really a great to meet you in person. And thanks for sharing your thoughts >> Jeff, thanks so much. You guys do a fantastic job and it's been a pleasure to be with you. >> Thank you. Allright. He's Bob Evans. I'm Jeff Frick. You're watching theCube from our Palo Alto studios. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. (soft music)
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world. the Cloud Wars Media coming to us. In Pittsburgh today. There's a lot of Fricks And I look forward to our conversation. Cause that's the only time you could get Jeff, you know, I just thought And it's in, you know, Citrix but it's because, you know, And for the most part, you with the cloud, you know, as you've said to rethink the way that you do things. And Jeff, you know, I think that had you asked them and he had the great line, you know and do things you never did before. to make sure I understand that number. So he said 9,000 virtual visits a month And, and for like, you know, No, and you know, that old but the actual execution day to day But he said, you know, cloud is a tool. And so from that to the and the customer's going to choose and this is going to be So he said, come to the And that's going to happen the time to move is now, the narrow lens of, you know great to meet you in person. and it's been a pleasure to be with you. We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jim Noga | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March 10th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Bob Evans | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Pittsburgh | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
David Henshall | PERSON | 0.99+ |
February | DATE | 0.99+ |
Seattle | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Steve Shute | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bill McDermott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March 15th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Thomas Kurian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
March 20th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Citrix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bob | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cloud Wars Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
12 and a half years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Novartis Pharmaceutical Company | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Henry Clay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
SAP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Winston Churchill | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
200 data scientists | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40,000 person | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Pittsburgh Pennsylvania | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
theCube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
8,000 a day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cloud Summit | EVENT | 0.99+ |
two and a half billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Kirsten Kliphouse | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Serge Lucio V1
>> Announcer: From around the globe, it's theCUBE with digital coverage of BizOps Manifesto Unveiled, brought to you by BizOps Coalition. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE for our ongoing coverage of the big unveil. It's the BizOps Manifesto Unveil and we're going to start that again. >> From the top. >> Three. >> Crew Member: Yeah, from the top. Little bleep bleep bleep, there we go. >> Manifesto. >> Crew Member: Second time's the charm, coming to you in five, four, three, two. >> Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with theCUBE coming to you from our Palo Alto studios today for a big, big reveal. We're excited to be here. It's the BizOps Manifesto Unveiling. Things have been in the works for a while and we're excited to have our next guest, one of the really the powers behind this whole effort and he's joining us from Boston. It's Serge Lucio, the Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise Software Division at Broadcom. Serge, great to see you. >> Good to see you, Jeff, Glad to be here. >> Absolutely. So, you've been in this business for a very long time, you've seen a lot of changes in technology. What is the BizOps Manifesto? What is this coalition all about? Why do we need this today in 2020? >> Yeah, so I've been in this business for close to 25 years, right? So, about 20 years ago, the Agile Manifesto was created. And the goal of the Agile Manifesto was really to address the uncertainty around software development and the inability to predict the effort to build software. And if you roll back kind of 20 years later and if you look at the current state of the industry, the Project Management Institute estimates that we're wasting about a million dollars every 20 seconds in digital transformation initiatives that do not deliver on business results. In fact, we recently surveyed a number of executives in partnership with Harvard Business Review and 77% of those executives think that one of the key challenges that they have is really at the collaboration between business and IT. And that's been kind of the case for almost 20 years now. So, the key challenge we're faced with is really that we need a new approach. And many of the players in the industry, including ourselves, have been using different terms, right? Some are talking about value stream management, some are talking about software delivery management. If you look at the Site Reliability Engineering movement, in many ways, it embodies a lot of these kind of concepts and principles. So, we believe that it became really imperative for us to crystallize around that one concept. And so, in many ways, the BizOps concept and the BizOps Manifesto are around bringing together a number of ideas which have been emerging in the last five years or so and defining the key values and principles to finally help these organizations truly transform and become digital businesses. And so, the hope is that by joining our forces and defining the key principles and values, we can help the industry, not just by providing them with support, but also the tools and consulting that is required for them to truly achieve the kind of transformation that everybody is seeking. >> Right, right. So, COVID, now, we're six months into it approximately, seven months into it, a lot of pain, a lot of bad stuff still happening, we've got two ways to go. But one of the things that on the positive side, right, and you seen all the memes in social media is a driver of digital transformation and a driver of change 'cause we had this light switch moment in the middle of March and there was no more planning, there was no more conversation, you suddenly got remote workforces, everybody's working from home and you got to go, right? So, the reliance on these tools increases dramatically. But I'm curious kind of short of the beginnings of this effort and short of kind of COVID which came along unexpectedly, I mean, what were those inhibitors 'cause we've been making software for a very long time, right? The software development community has adopted kind of rapid change and iterative delivery and sprints, what was holding back the connection with the business side to make sure that those investments were properly aligned with outcomes? >> Well, you have to understand that IT is kind of its own silos and traditionally, IT has been treated as a cost center within large organizations and not as a value center. And so as a result, kind of the traditional dynamic between IT and the business is basically one of kind of supplier up to kind of a business. And if you go back to I think Elon Musk a few years ago basically had these concepts of the machines to build the machines and he went as far as saying that the machines or the production line is actually the product. So, meaning that the core of the innovation is really about building kind of the engine to deliver on the value. And so, in many ways, we have missed on this shift from kind of IT becoming this kind of value center within the enterprises. And it's all about culture. Now, culture is the sum total of behaviors and the reality is that if you look at IT, especially in the last decade, with Agile, with DevOps, with hybrid infrastructures, it's way more volatile today than it was 10 years ago. And so, when you start to look at the velocity of the data, the volume of data, the variety of data to analyze the system, it's very challenging for IT to actually even understand and optimize its own processes, let alone to actually include business as kind of an integral part of a delivery chain. And so, it's both kind of a combination of culture, which is required, as well as tools, right? To be able to start to bring together all these data together. And then, given the volume, variety, velocity of the data, we have to apply some core technologies, which have only really truly emerged in the last five to 10 years around machine learning and analytics. And so, it's really kind of a combination of those things, which are coming together today to really help organizations kind of get to the next level. >> Right, right. So, let's talk about the manifesto. Let's talk about the coalition, the BizOps Coalition. I just like that you put down these really simple kind of straightforward core values. You guys have four core values that you're highlighting, business outcomes over individual projects and outputs, trust and collaboration over siloed teams and organizations, data driven decisions, what you just talked about, over opinions and judgment and learn to respond and pivot. I mean, Serge, these sounds like pretty basic stuff, right? I mean, isn't everyone working to these values already? And I think you touched on it, on culture, right? Trust and collaboration, data driven decisions. I mean, these are fundamental ways that people must run their business today or the person that's across the street that's doing it is going to knock them right off their block. >> Yeah, so that's very true. So, I'll mention another survey we did I think about six months ago. It was in partnership with an industry analyst. And we surveyed, again, a number of IT executives to understand how many were tracking business outcomes, how many of these software executives, IT executives were tracking business outcomes. And there were less than 15% of these executives who were actually tracking the outcomes of the software delivery. And you see that every day, right? So, in my own teams, for instance, we've been adopting a lot of these core principles in the last year or so. And we've uncovered that 16% of our resources were basically aligned around initiatives which were not strategic for us. I take another example. For instance, one of our customers in the airline industry uncovered, for instance, that a number of... That they had software issues that led to people searching for flights and not returning any kind of availability. And yet, the IT teams, whether it's operations or software development, were completely oblivious to that because they were completely blindsided to it. And so, the connectivity between the inwards metrics that IT is using, whether it's database uptime, cycle time or whatever metric we use in IT, are typically completely divorced from the business metrics. And so, at its core, it's really about starting to align the business metrics with the software delivery chain, right? This system which is really a core differentiator for these organizations. It's about connecting those two things and starting to infuse some of the Agile culture and principles that emerge from the software side into the business side. Of course, the Lean movement and other movements have started to change some of these dynamic on the business side. And so, I think this is the moment where we are starting to see kind of the imperative to transform now, COVID obviously has been a key driver for that. The technology is right to start to be able to weave data together and really kind of also the cultural shifts through Agile, through DevOps, through the SRE movement, through Lean business transformation. All these things are coming together and are really creating kind of conditions for the BizOps Manifesto to exist. So, Clayton Christensen, great Harvard Professor, "Innovator's Dilemma", still my all-time favorite business book, talks about how difficult it is for incumbents to react to disruptive change, right? Because they're always working on incremental change 'cause that's what their customers are asking for and there's a good ROI.' When you talk about companies not measuring the right thing, I mean, clearly, IT has some portion of their budget that has to go to keeping the lights on, right? That's always the case, but hopefully, that's an ever decreasing percentage of their total activity. So, what should people be measuring? I mean, what are kind of the new metrics in BizOps that drive people to be looking at the right things, measuring the right things and subsequently making the right decisions, investment decisions, on whether they should move project A along or project B? >> So, there are really two things, right? So, I think what you were talking about is portfolio management, investment management, right? And which is a key challenge, right? In my own experience, right? Driving strategy or a large scale kind of software organization for years, it's very difficult to even get kind of a base data as to who's doing what. I mean, some of our largest customers we're engaged with right now are simply trying to get a very simple answer, which is, how many people do I have in that specific initiative at any point in time and just tracking down information is extremely difficult. And again, back to the Project Management Institute, they have estimated that on average, IT organizations have anywhere between 10 to 20% of their resources focused on initiatives which are not strategically aligned. So, that's one dimension on portfolio management. I think the key aspect though, that's we're really keen on is really around kind of the alignment of a business metrics to the IT metrics. So, I'll use kind of two simple examples, right? And my background is around quality and I've always believed that fitness for purpose is really kind of a key philosophy, if you will. And so, if you start to think about quality as fitness for purpose, you start to look at it from a customer point of view, right? And fitness for purpose for a core banking application or mobile application are different, right? So, the definition of a business value that you're trying to achieve is different. And yet, if you look at our IT operations are operating, they were using kind of a same type of inward metrics, like a database uptime or a cycle time or what is my point velocity, right? And so, the challenge really is this inward facing metrics that the IT is using which are divorced from ultimately the outcome. And so, if I'm trying to build a core banking application, my core metric is likely going to be uptime, right? If I'm trying to build a mobile application or maybe a social mobile app, it's probably going to be engagement. And so, what you want is for everybody across IT to look at these metric and what are the metrics within the software delivery chain which ultimately contribute to that business metric? In some cases, cycle time may be completely irrelevant, right? Again, my core banking app, maybe I don't care about cycle time. And so, it's really about aligning those metrics and be able to start to differentiate. The key challenge you mentioned around the disruption that we see is or the investor's dilemma is really around the fact that many IT organizations are essentially applying the same approaches for innovation, right? For basically scrap work than they would apply to kind of other more traditional projects. And so, there's been a lot of talk about two-speed IT. And yes, it exists, but in reality, are really organizations truly differentiating how they operate their projects and products based on the outcomes that they're trying to achieve? And this is really where BizOps is trying to affect. >> I love that. Again, it doesn't seem like brain surgery, but focus on the outcomes, right? And it's horses for courses, as you said. This project, what you're measuring and how you define success isn't necessarily the same as on this other project. So, let's talk about some of the principles. We talked about the values, but I think it's interesting that the BizOps coalition just basically took the time to write these things down and they don't seem all that super insightful, but I guess you just got to get them down and have them on paper and have them in front of your face. But I want to talk about one of the key ones, which you just talked about, which is changing requirements, right? And working in a dynamic situation, which is really what's driven the software to change in software development because if you're in a game app and your competitor comes out with a new blue sword, you got to come out with a new blue sword. So, whether you had that on your Kanban wall or not. So, it's really this embracing of the speed of change and making that the rule, not the exception. I think that's a phenomenal one. And the other one you talked about is data, right? And that today's organizations generate more data than humans can process. So, informed decisions must be generated by machine learning and AI. And the big data thing with Hadoop started years ago, but we are seeing more and more that people are finally figuring it out, that it's not just big data and it's not even generic machine learning or artificial intelligence, but it's applying those particular data sets and that particular types of algorithms to a specific problem to your point, to try to actually reach an objective, whether that's increasing your average ticket or increasing your checkout rate with shopping carts that don't get left behind and these types of things. So, it's a really different way to think about the world in the good old days, probably when you guys started when we had big giant MRDs and PRDS and sat down and coded for two years and came out with a product release and hopefully, not too many patches subsequently to that. >> It's interesting, right? Again, back to one of these surveys that we did with about 600 IT executives. And we purposely designed those questions to be pretty open. And one of them was really around requirements. And it was really around kind of what is the best approach? What is your preferred approach towards requirements? And if I remember correctly, over 80% of the IT executives said that the best approach, their preferred approach, is for requirements to be completely defined before software development starts. So, let me pause there. We're 20 years after the Agile Manifesto, right? And for 80% of these IT executives to basically claim that the best approach is for requirements to be fully baked before software development starts, basically shows that we still have a very major issue. And again, our hypothesis in working with many organizations is that the key challenge is really the boundary between business and IT, which is still very much contract-based. If you look at the business side, they basically are expecting for IT to deliver on time on budget, right? But what is the incentive for IT to actually deliver on the business outcomes, right? How often is IT measured on the business outcomes and not on an SLA or on a budget type criteria. And so, that's really the fundamental shift that we really need to drive out as an industry. And, we talk about kind of this imperative for organizations to operate as one. And back to the the "Innovator's Dilemma", the key difference between these larger organization is really kind of a... If you look at the amount of capital investment that they can put into pretty much anything, why are they losing compared to startups? Why is it that more than 40% of personal loans today are issued, not by your traditional brick and mortar banks, but by startups? Well, the reason, yes, it's the traditional culture of doing incremental changes and not disrupting ourselves, which Christensen covered at length, but it's also the inability to really fundamentally change kind of the dynamic between business and IT and partner, right? To deliver on a specific business outcome. >> Right, I love that. That's a great summary and in fact, getting ready for this interview, I saw you mentioning another thing where the problem with the Agile development is that you're actually now getting more silos 'cause you have all these autonomous people working kind of independently. So, it's even a harder challenge for the business leaders, as you said, to know what's actually going on. But Serge, I want to close and talk about the coalition. So clearly, these are all great concepts. These are concepts you want to apply to your business every day. Why the coalition? Why take these concepts out to a broader audience, including your competition and the broader industry to say, "Hey, we as a group need to put a stamp of approval on these concepts, these values, these principles?" >> So first, I think we want everybody to realize that we are all talking about the same things, the same concepts. I think we're all from our own different vantage point realizing that things have to change. And again, back to whether it's value stream management or Site Reliability Engineering or BizOps, we're all kind of using slightly different languages. And so, I think one of the important aspects of BizOps is for us, all of us, whether we're talking about consulting, Agile transformation experts, whether we're talking about vendors, right? To provides kind of tools and technologies or these large enterprises to transform for all of us to basically have kind of a reference that lets us speak around kind of in a much more consistent way. The second aspect, to me, is for these concepts to start to be embraced, not just by us or vendors, system integrators, consulting firms, educators, thought leaders, but also for some of our own customers to start to become evangelists of their own in the industry. So, our objective with the coalition is to be pretty, pretty broad. And our hope is by starting to basically educate our joint customers or partners, that we can start to really foster these behaviors and start to really change some of dynamics. So, we're very pleased that if you look at some of the companies which have joined the manifesto, so we have vendors, such as Tasktop, or Appvance or PagerDuty, for instance, or even Planview, one of my direct competitors, but also thought leaders like Tom Davenport or Capgemini or smaller firms like Business Agility Institute or AgilityHealth. And so, our goal really is to start to bring together thought leaders, people who've been helping large organizations do digital transformation, vendors who are providing the technologies that many of these organizations use to deliver on this digital transformation and for all of us to start to provide the kind of education, support and tools that the industry needs. >> Yeah, that's great, Serge, and congratulations to you and the team. I know this has been going on for a while, putting all this together, getting people to sign on to the manifesto, putting the coalition together and finally today, getting to unveil it to the world in a little bit more of a public opportunity. So again, really good values, really simple principles, something that shouldn't have to be written down, but it's nice 'cause it is and now you can print it out and stick it on your wall. So, thank you for sharing the story and again, congrats to you and the team. >> Thank you, thanks, Jeff, appreciate it. >> My pleasure, all righty, Serge. If you want to learn more about the BizOps Manifesto, go to bizopsmanifesto.org, read it and you can sign it and you can stay here for more coverage on theCUBE of the BizOps Manifesto Unveiled. Thanks for watching, see you next time. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by BizOps Coalition. of the big unveil. Crew Member: Yeah, from the top. coming to you in five, Things have been in the works for a while Glad to be here. What is the BizOps Manifesto? and the inability to predict So, the reliance on these and the reality is that if you look at IT, So, let's talk about the manifesto. for the BizOps Manifesto to exist. And so, the challenge really And the other one you kind of the dynamic and talk about the coalition. And so, our goal really is to start and congratulations to you and the team. of the BizOps Manifesto Unveiled.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Serge | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Serge Lucio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Clayton Christensen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AgilityHealth | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Project Management Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Elon Musk | PERSON | 0.99+ |
16% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Business Agility Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Capgemini | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Project Management Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
more than 40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Broadcom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Innovator's Dilemma | TITLE | 0.99+ |
77% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second aspect | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
BizOps Coalition | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
less than 15% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Agile Manifesto | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Second time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two-speed | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Agile Manifesto | TITLE | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
20 years later | DATE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Appvance | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Tasktop | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Planview | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
middle of March | DATE | 0.98+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
PagerDuty | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Harvard | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
project A | OTHER | 0.97+ |
about 600 IT executives | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
over 80% | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
bizopsmanifesto.org | OTHER | 0.96+ |
DevOps | TITLE | 0.96+ |
almost 20 years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Agile | TITLE | 0.95+ |
two simple examples | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Tom Davenport | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
one concept | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
BizOps Manifesto | EVENT | 0.93+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Three | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
about 20 years ago | DATE | 0.9+ |
BizOps Manifesto Unveil | EVENT | 0.9+ |
BizOps Manifesto | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Harvard Business Review | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
PRDS | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
BizOps Manifesto Unveiling | EVENT | 0.88+ |
years ago | DATE | 0.88+ |
two ways | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |