Neil Macdonald, HPE | HPE Discover 2022
>>The Cube Presents HPD Discovered 2020 >>two. >>Brought to You by H. P E >>Good >>Morning Live from the Venetian Expo Centre Lisa Martin Day Volonte Day two of the Cubes Coverage of HP Discover 22 We've had some great conversations yesterday. Today, full day, a content coming your way. We've got one of our alumni back with us. Neil MacDonald joins us, the executive vice president and general manager of Compute at HPD Neale, Great to have you back on the Cube. >>It's great to be back. And how cool is it to be able to do this face to face again instead of on zoom. Right. So >>great. Great. The keynote yesterday absolutely packed, so refreshing to see that many people eager to hear what HP has been doing. It's been three years since we've all gotten together in person. >>It is, and we've been busy. We've been busy. We've got to share some great news yesterday about some of the work that we're doing with HB Green Lake Cloud Platform and really bringing together all the capabilities across the company in a very unified, cohesive way to enable our customers to embrace that as a service experience we committed to Antonio three years ago, said we were gonna deliver everything we do as a company as a service through Green Lake and we've done it. And it's fantastic to see the momentum that that's really building and how it's breaking down the silos from different types of infrastructure and offer to really create integrated solutions for our customers. So that's been a lot of fun. >>Give us the scope of your role, your areas of responsibility. And then I'd love to hear some feedback. You've been a couple of days here around customers. What some of the feedback help us understand that. >>So at HP, I lead the Compute business, which is our largest business. That includes our hardware and software and services in the compute space. Both, um, what flows through the green late model, but also what throws flows through a traditional purchase model. So, um, that's, uh, that's about $13 billion business for the company and the core of so much of what we do, and it's a real honour to be leading a business that's such a a legacy in a franchise with with 30 years of innovation for our customers in an ocean of followers. Um and it's great to be able to start to share some of the next chapters in that with our customers this week. >>Well, it's almost half the business H p e and as we've talked about, it's an awesome time to be in the computer business. What are you seeing in terms of the trends? Obviously you're all in on as a service. But some customers say, Tell me I got a lot of capital. Yeah, absolutely. I'm fine with Capex. What are you hearing from customers in that regard? And presumably you're happy to sell them in a kind of Capex model? >>Absolutely. And in the current environment, in particular with with some of the economic headwinds that we're starting to stare down here, it's really important for organisations to continue to transform digitally but to be able to match their investments with the revenues as they're building new services and new capabilities. And for some organisations, the challenge of investing all the Capex up front is a big lift and there's quite a delay before they can really monetise all of that. So the power of HP Green Lake is enabling them to match their investment in the infrastructure on a pay as you go basis with the actual revenue they're going to generate from their new capability. So for lots of people that works. But for many other customers, it's it's much more palatable to continue in a Capex purchase, but and we're delighted to do that. A lot of my business still is in that mode. What's changing the or what are the needs, whether you're in the green light environment or in the Capex environment? Um, increasingly, the edge has become a bigger and bigger part of all of our worlds, right, the edges where we all live and work. We've all seen over the last couple of years enormous change in how that work experience and how the shape of businesses has changed, and that creates some challenges for infrastructure. So one of the things that we've announced and we shared some more details of this week is HP Green Light for Computer Ops Management, which is a location agnostic, cloud based management set up that enables you to automate and lifecycle, manage your physical compute infrastructure wherever it lies, so that might be in a distributed environment in hotel locations or out at the edge for so much more data is now being gathered and has to be computed on. So we're really excited about that. And the great thing is because it's fully integrated with HP. Green Light Cloud Platform is in there alongside the storage, alongside the connectivity alongside all the other capabilities. And we can bring those together in a very cohesive infrastructure view for our customers and then build workloads and services and tops. And that's that's really exciting. How have >>your customer conversations evolved, especially over the last couple of years as the edge has exploded? But we've been living in such uncertain times. Are you seeing a change there in the stakeholders rising up the C suite stack in terms of how do we really fine tune this? Because we've got to be competitive. We've got to be a data company. >>Well, that's so true because everybody has seen seen data as a currency and is desperately innovating and Modernising their business model, and with it, the underlying infrastructure and how they think about development. And nowhere is that truer than in enterprises that really becoming digital. First, organisations more and more companies are doing their own in house full stack, cloud native development and pivoting hard from a more traditional view of in house enterprise i t. And in that regard, >>let's >>start to look a lot like a Saas company or a service provider in terms of the needs of the infrastructure you want linear performance scaling. You want to be very sensitive not just to the cost, as you call it, but also to the environmental cost and the power efficiency. And so yesterday we were really thrilled to announce the HBP Reliant are all 300 General Live in, which is the first of our general living platforms. And that's in partnership with Ampere is the first of several things that we're gonna go do together. We're looking forward to building out the rest of our Gen 11 portfolio broadly with all of our industry partners in the in the coming quarters. But we're thrilled about the feedback that we're starting to get from some of our customers about the gains in power efficiency that they're getting from using this new server line that we've developed with amber. >>So, you know, this is an area that I'm very interested in what I write about this a lot. So tell us the critical aspects of Gen 11, where ampere fits, is it is it being used for primarily offloads and there's a core share with us. So >>if you look at the opportunity here is really as a core compute tool for organisations that are doing that in house full snack cloud native development and in that environment, being able to do it with great power efficiency at a great cost point is the great combination. The maturity of the ecosystem, um, is really, really improving to the point where is much, much more accessible for those loads? And if you consider how the infrastructure evolves underneath it, the gains that you get from power efficiency multiply. It's a TCO benefit. It's obviously an environmental benefit, and we all have much, much more to do as an industry on that journey. But every little helps, and we're really excited about being able to bring that to market. The other thing that we've done is recognising the value that we bring in the prelim experience, everything with our integrated lights out management, all of the security, the, uh, hardware root of trust, the secure boot chains, all of that Reliant family values we brought to that platform, just as we do with our others. But we've also recognised that for some of our service provider customers, there's a lot of interest in leveraging open BMC and being able to integrate the management plane and control that in house and tie it to whatever orchestrations being done in the service product. So we have full support for open BMC out of the box out of the gate with Janna Levin. And that's one of the ways that we're evolving. Are offering to meet our customers where they are, including not just the assassin service providers but the enterprises who are starting to adopt more and more of those practises as they build out digital. First, >>tell us more about the architecture. If you would kneel. I mean, so where does ampere and that partnership add value? That's incremental to what you what you might think is a traditional server architecture. How's that evolving? >>Well, it's another alternative for certain workloads in that full stack in house proud Native Development model. Um, it's another choice. It's another option and something that's very excited about >>That's the right course for the horse, for the course that was back in internal development because it's just more efficient. It's lower power, more sustainable. All those things exactly. >>And the wonderful thing for us in the uh in this juncture in the market is there is so much architectural innovation. There are so many innovators out there in the industry creating different optimizations in technology with the lesson silicon or other aspects of the system. And that gives us a much broader palette to paint from as we meet our customers' needs as their businesses involving the requirements are evolving, we can be much more creative as we bring this all together. It's a real thrill to be able to bring some of these technologies into the HP reliant space because we've always felt that compute matters. We've always known that hardware matters, and we've been leading and innovating and meeting these needs as they've evolved over the decades, and it's really fun to be able to continue to do that. Hardware still >>matters. It doesn't matter. We know that here on the Cube, talk about the influence of the customer with so much architectural innovation. There's a lot of choice for customers in every industry. When you're in customer conversations, how are you helping them make decisions? One of the key differentiators that you articulate that's going to really help them achieve outcomes that they have to achieve? >>Well, I think that's exactly as you say. It's about the outcome. Too often, I think the conversation can get down into the lower level details of component, tree and technology and our philosophy. HP has always been focused on what it is that the customer is trying to achieve. How are they trying to serve their customers? What are their needs? And then we can bring an opinionated point of view on the best way to solve that problem, whether that's recommendations on the particular Capex, infrastructure and architecture to build or increasingly, the opportunity to serve that through HP Green Lake, either as hard or as a service. Or is HP Green Lake services further up the stack? Because when you start talking about what is the outcome you're trying to achieve, you have you have a much, much better opportunity to focus the technology to serve the business and not get wrapped up in managing the infrastructure and that's what we love to do. >>So where? Give us the telescope vision. Maybe not to tell a binocular vision as to where compute is going. We're clearly seeing more diversity in silicon. Uh, it's not just a you know x 86 CPU world anymore. There's all these other supporting components new workloads coming in. Where do you you mentioned Edge, whole new ballgame ai inference sing. And that was kind of new workloads, offloads and things of that. Where do you see it all going in the next 3 to 5 years? >>I think it's gonna be really, really exciting time because more and more of our data is getting captured to the edge. And because of the experiences that companies are trying to deliver and organisations are trying to deliver that requires more and more stories are more and more compute at the edge. The edge is not just about connectivity, and again, that's why with the F B green light cloud platform, the power of bringing together the connectivity with the compute with the storage with the other capabilities in that integrated way gives us the ability to serve that combined need at the edge in a very, very compelling way. The room moves a lot of friction and a lot of work for our customers. But as you see that happen, you're going to see more and more combining of functionalities. The silos are going to start to break down between different classes of building block in the data centre, and you've already seen shifts with more and more software to find more and more hybrid offerings running across a computing substrate. But perhaps delivering storage services are analytic services or other workloads, and you're gonna see that to conduct that continue to evolve. So it's gonna be very fun over the next few years to see that, uh, that diversification and a much more opinionated set of offers for particular use cases and workloads and at our job and value is going to be simplifying that complexity because choices great right up to the point where you're paralysed by too many choices. So the wonderful thing about the world that's been done here is that we're able to bring that opinionated point of view and help guide, and again it's all about starting with what are you trying to achieve. What are the outcomes you're trying to deliver? And if you start there were having a great time helping our customers find the right path forward. >>Wow, it sounds like a fun job. Talk to me about, you know, maybe one of your favourite examples that you really think articulates the value of of the choice and the opportunities that HP can deliver to customers, maybe favourite customer example where you think we really nailed it here and they're achieving some incredible outcomes. >>Well, we're really excited about this week as I was chatting with the CEO of Cloud Sigma, which is a global ideas and pass provider who's actually been using our new HP per client moral 300 general live in Are you on purpose? Server line? And, uh, their CEO was reporting to me yesterday that based on his benchmarking, they're seeing a significant improvement in power efficiency, and that's that's that's cool to an engineer. But what's even better is the next thing, he said. That's enabling them to deliver better cost to their customers and advanced their sustainability goals, which is such a core part of what we as an industry and we as society are going to have to continue to make stepwise progress against over the next decade in order to confront those challenges in the environment so that that's that's really fulfilling, not just to see the tech, which is always interesting to an engineer but actually see the impact that it's having an enabling that outcome foreclosed signal >>so many customers, including Cloud Sigma and customers in every industry. E S G is an incredibly important initiative. And so it's vital for companies that have a core focus on E. S G to partner with companies like HP who will help them facilitate that actually demonstrate outcomes to their own users. >>It's such an important journey and it's gonna be a journey of many steps together. But I think it's one of the most critical partnerships that as an industry and as an ecosystem, we still have a lot of work to do and we have to stay focused on it every day, continuing, moving the bar. >>You >>know, to your point about E. S G. You see these E s G reports. Now that they're unbelievable, the data that is in them and the responsibility that organisations mid and large organisations have to actually publish that and be held accountable. It's actually kind of daunting, but there's a lot of investments going on there. You're absolutely right. The >>accountability is key, and it's it's it's necessary to have an accountability partner and ecosystem that can facilitate that. Exactly. >>We just published last week our Own Living Progress report this year, talking about some of the steps that we're making the commitments that we pulled in in time. Um, and we're looking forward to continue to work on that with our customers and with the industry, because it's so critical that we make faster progress together on that >>last question. What's your favourite comment that you've heard the last couple of days being back in person with about 8000 customers, partners and execs? It's >>not. It's not the common. It's the sparkles in the eyes. It's the energy. It is so great to be back together, face to face. I think we, uh, we've soldiered through a couple of tough years. We've done a lot of things remotely together, but there's no substitute for being back together, and the energy is just palpable and it's it's fantastic to be able to share some of what we've been up to in the interim and see the excitement about getting adopted by customers and partners. >>I agree the energy has been fantastic. We were talking about that yesterday. You brought it today, Neil, Thank you so much for joining us. We're excited about Antonio coming up next, going to unpack all the announcements. Really good customers. Perspective from the top of H P E for Neil and Dave Volonte. I'm Lisa Martin joins us in just a few minutes as the CEO of HP, Antonio Neary joins us next.
SUMMARY :
Neale, Great to have you back on the Cube. And how cool is it to be able to do this face to face again instead of on zoom. many people eager to hear what HP has been doing. And it's fantastic to see the momentum that that's really building and how it's breaking And then I'd love to hear some feedback. be able to start to share some of the next chapters in that with our customers this week. Well, it's almost half the business H p e and as we've talked about, So the power of HP Green Lake is enabling them to match their We've got to be a data company. and with it, the underlying infrastructure and how they think about development. the cost, as you call it, but also to the environmental cost and the power efficiency. So tell us the critical aspects of Gen 11, where ampere fits, is it is it being used development and in that environment, being able to do it with great power efficiency at a That's incremental to what you It's another option and something that's very excited about That's the right course for the horse, for the course that was back in internal development because over the decades, and it's really fun to be able to continue to do that. We know that here on the Cube, talk about the influence of the customer with It's about the outcome. as to where compute is going. And because of the experiences that companies are trying to deliver and organisations are trying to deliver of of the choice and the opportunities that HP can deliver to customers, against over the next decade in order to confront those challenges in the environment so that that's that's really a core focus on E. S G to partner with companies like HP who every day, continuing, moving the bar. the data that is in them and the responsibility that organisations mid and large accountability is key, and it's it's it's necessary to have an accountability partner and and with the industry, because it's so critical that we make faster progress together on that It's and the energy is just palpable and it's it's fantastic to be able to share some of what we've been up to in the interim I agree the energy has been fantastic.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Neil MacDonald | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Neil | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Janna Levin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Neil Macdonald | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ampere | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Antonio Neary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cloud Sigma | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Saas | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Green Lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
H P E | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Capex | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
about $13 billion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Antonio | PERSON | 0.98+ |
about 8000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Venetian Expo Centre | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Green Light | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.96+ |
HP Green Lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
ampere | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
HBP Reliant | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Green Light Cloud Platform | TITLE | 0.92+ |
HPD Neale | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
HPD | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
5 years | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
E. S G | TITLE | 0.85+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.83+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.83+ |
Lake Cloud Platform | TITLE | 0.82+ |
Gen 11 | OTHER | 0.82+ |
last couple of years | DATE | 0.8+ |
Green Lake | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.79+ |
Day | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
BMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
H. P E | PERSON | 0.75+ |
3 | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.74+ |
300 General | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
Own Living Progress | TITLE | 0.7+ |
last couple | DATE | 0.7+ |
Lisa Martin Day Volonte | EVENT | 0.62+ |
Discover 22 | EVENT | 0.62+ |
amber | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
HB Green | ORGANIZATION | 0.6+ |
300 | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
days | DATE | 0.59+ |
11 | OTHER | 0.57+ |
Cédric Gégout, Amdocs | Couchbase Application Modernization
>>Mm. >>Amdocs is a leader in providing software and services to some key industries, like telecommunications, media and financial services. In our next session, >>we >>welcome Cedric Jay Gould, who is the head of technical product at Amdocs. And we'll learn about Amdocs modernisation journey and how it added value for their end customers. Cedric. Welcome. >>Welcome. Good. >>Thank you. So describe your modern application, your portfolio, and you know what you're delivering for customers. >>So home dogs is B s s S s players who we are providing a food digital suite for customers. Uh, our customers are communication service providers, which are have to deploy a full digital sweets customer experience. Um, we're for the full os BSS, BSS tax. So, actually, Amdocs is one of the leader in this kind of digital transformation. >>So of course you talk about this as and BS. I mean, you're talking about some really hardened, uh, stacks, right? Uh, telco industry. Uh, say what you want about it, but, boy, the phone works when you dial it. So So you've got this sort of a decades old, you know, platform that you guys have been evolving over the over the years. described this modernisation journey and and the role that couch base played. What value does this offer This modernisation offer to your organisation. And where does Couch based fit? >>Yeah, exactly the same. So that so. Basically what, uh, all solution is You know, it's a broad for you of a large number of components which have to deal with funds, uh, experience of the user and from and then dealing all the, uh, activation of the services in the network in order to deliver a solution, Uh, your services, like mobile services or communication services to, uh, Susan users. So we have a full suites, which, uh, was previously based on, you know, on technology is based on the oracle with web logic and things like that. And what we did is that we do a modernisation of, uh, this something, like, six years ago. A bit more than six years ago. We start to modernisation and transformation of our product into a creative solution. Collaborative solutions. So, uh, and when we did that, we start with Coach base as a partner, uh, to provide the nominative database. So we are actually delivery. We have a guarantee of more than 8000 people developing this product. It's a product which is used by more than 300 customers. Uh, so So it's it's real product that needs to be very flexible. That needs to address many kind of use cases from, uh, Telco or customers, which RCs PS usually till 0 to 1 telco. So we what we wanted to build is a food creative solution that can work on any cloud, then can can skill very, very easily and can address multiple use cases. Okay, And that's why, Coach Base, when we selected Coach Basit, it matched a lot of requirements and criteria as we had. And when we decided to modernise our product, we decided to work with >>you. So you had a lot of experience and and legacy with Oracle and Web logic. I'm curious just to follow up. Why didn't you stay with Oracle? You mentioned? Gotta run any cloud. You gotta be flexible. But could you could you double click on what Couch based delivered from a requirement standpoint, that was such a good fit? >>Well, there's there's a good fit with technology that such as, uh, coach basis. First it's a noise school detonates, right? So it's in terms of performance for some of the youth case that we have. It's very important to have, you know, technology which are are done and optimised for the noise secure use cases. That's the first thing. The second thing as I mentioned the scalability, the fact that you can, almost indefinitely infinitely you can increase the size of your cluster. You can have more, uh, servers and and and And this will skill, you know, very rapidly. And also what we're very interesting to have from coach bases the ability to have something which can be replicated across multiple sites. So with visual technology from coach base, which enable to build, you know, very modern architecture with deployment on multiple agents to have disaster recovery, active, active sites, you know, things like that which are very becoming like the main requirement for more customers now. >>Okay, so I'm presuming there were parts of your application portfolio that you weren't gonna touch and throw away that you had to collect or connect the new with the old. That's always, you know, you know, a challenge. I'm wondering what advice you give to an organisation. That's kind of investing in a similar path, trying to deliver the best digital experiences to customers. You know what? What would you say are the modernisation you gotta have must have, whether it's architecture, internal culture, what are some of those items? >>So so that yes, you're right. I think the integration with the legacy systems is actually, you know, very, very important topic in all domain in the domain. But we we made a very, uh, will see drastic choice or brave choice choice. When, uh, 60 years from now, when we decided to reformat to re platforms are completely or portfolio. Okay, So we we changed more than 95% of our portfolio and 95% of the portfolio today, Arklow native. Which means that they can be deployed on any cloud that actually, they are fully scalable and and and still, we did this transformation. Now, when we do the digital transformation of the, uh, customer system, then we need to integrate with legacy systems, and we need to help our customers to migrate from the legacy systems to creative solutions and doing so, it's important to have in the database domain. It's very important to have a solution which is very flexible in terms of, uh, what kind of data I can manage. And I can, as I said, skill easily, for sure. But also, it's sexual. Okay, Because when you are moving the data from a legacy system or record based or whatever to, uh, another type of, uh, database, you want to be sure that you are you can do it securely, and you're you're not, uh, compromising in any sense, Uh, in terms of security scalability, uh, etcetera. Right. So So, um, in this case, I mean, I will say And then in this opportunities journey, uh, this was very, very, very, very important component in, uh, you know, in our strategy, for all the reasons I mentioned right, it's very coordinative. It's scalable, It's secure. Uh, it's another product, uh, grade. So? So that's that's why it really is. So there's there's a chest back to you. >>You know, this notion that 90 per you really re platform 90% of your portfolio and made a cloud native. That's that's a It's a brave move because a lot of companies do that that I've talked to. They will build an abstraction layer and microservices and make that piece cloud native and then have that kind of overlay. You decided not to do that. Why is that? Was that for performance reasons? You were worried about just bringing along technical debt. I mean, that really must have been an interesting discussion internally in your company. >>Yeah, it's true. I mean, the main motivation, the main driver was business flexibility. Because now we live in a world where our customers, what they need is to be able to test the new feature quickly. And they need to be able to scale the system in a matter of hours. Okay, so we are not in a domain anymore. Where you you when you have to upgrade something, you need to take a few days. It needs to be done in a very, very quickly. And the only way to achieve those, uh, requirements business requirements is to be creative. It's to build microservices and to really realise one of those per cent of, uh, micro services architecture because this is the only way you will have the business flexibility. You will be able to have a resilient architecture. Uh, you know, you can, uh you can deploy this with full high availability across multiple zones, multiple regions and feeling that so, uh, any modern architecture today that that is competing with us, Actually, a micro services based architecture. There is no other way to achieve, uh to to to meet the requirement of the market today, and especially when five g is coming, things will become much more complex. Will become much more, uh, distributed. Uh, you cannot work anymore with the model it architecture. And again, I think the database is nowhere different. Needs to follow the same kind of architecture needs to follow the same principles. So that's that's why am I mean another another point about Yeah, >>So if I If I summarised, it sounds like your top three requirements would be flexibility, which you're getting from the cloud native and microservices piece the scale and the security. Is that right? That I get that right? The three top >>That's right. And the resilience as well. I mean the fact that now you know, with micro services architecture, if one of the system is done, he knows how to self to restart it himself. Right itself. Sorry. So So that's this kind of architecture that we built. It's an architecture which can be resilient in a sense that it can sense itself, and it can ensure full availability. And if something is going down, is not working properly, then on some kind of mechanisms will happen in order to go back to a stable state. >>Yeah. So you've got that automation in there. So you don't doesn't require the labour that it might have 10 years ago. So you're obviously embracing cloud native microservices. So you're on that jury. I'm curious. What are you doing with that? You're you're freeing up. You guys used to bring in lab coats and dig in and figure out what's wrong or restart the system. Where are you in your journey, and how are you? Sort of reallocating those resources. And where do you see that going? >>Yeah, Okay, so that's that's a very good point. Because actually, we when we build this new system, which is unable to do, you know, to self heal himself, right? Uh, actually, the question was more about how we can improve the system, even know how we can be sure that, uh, you know, issues that we we any issues which we are we are facing will not happen again. Well, not actual again. Okay. And this is a, uh, principle. Okay, Practise that we have now people are walking on automation. They're building automation around all these recovery procedures about, uh, fixing. So they're not actually digging into the application now anymore into the system, they learn how the system is walking and buildings all the right automation task to ensure that the system is constantly, constantly resilient. Alright, so that's the necessary practises organisation is now built around. You know, this kind of this approach developed computer develops being fully a geologically having sa reorganisation SRE oriented organisation. And, uh and that's the only way you know you can reach very high, uh, in terms of availability. >>So the big problem that your traditional telco customers have is the amount of data that they're servicing going through the roof and the cost per bit is sinking like that. And you have all the over the top providers coming in creating these customer experiences with modern applications and they've owned the customer data. You mentioned five g. So I'm interested in what the future of modern apps looks like for Amdocs and your customers because five G gives your traditional telco customers the ability if they can have these flexible systems that you're providing to now have better relationships with customers and actually kind of reclaim, you know, some of that that value that they've lost to a lot of competitors, your thoughts on the future. >>So first, you know, technically speaking, we we we will have two challenges. One is about data, and other one is about distribution of the work. Okay, because when we are speaking about five g, we're speaking about the age. We're speaking about the fact that an application may be located very closely to the network because it needs to be to to achieve, you know, to to deliver a very short latency, and, uh and this application can move. Okay, so you you you you will have to be able to distribute completely your your solutions. Okay. And that's why we are working closely with, uh, club providers at the US as you Google and because we we need to be sure that the applications of the systems that we are building will be able to distribute the application as close as possible to the end users. Okay, so that's that's one of the key challenges. Which means that the application is to be very possible and he'd be very scalable, and then it needs to be able to move very quickly from one place to another. That's really what is what What, what? What is happening now and what will become, uh, with five G? The other challenge is behind the communication of all these components is really the data, because now we will capture more and more that are coming from the different systems. And I'm not speaking only about the consequence the customer that are who they are, what they what they like and what they want to do, etcetera. And speaking also about, uh, monitoring that of the systems. Okay, so we will generate a lot of information and this this information needs to be traded very quickly, needs to be stored in very large data lake, and we need to have extraction and manipulation of the data very, very quickly to to give the right information to the applications. Um, in this case, okay, it's very important to have application to have databases that can as I said, skill very quickly. But also we'll be able to have very ideal city note, you know, sense that they with a certain amount of memory or sentiment of storage, you can store a lot of data. And this is where we are always, you know, checking what is the best technologies. And so far, not coach bases, technologies that we're using for for stalking, storing all the data. Because because it's it's a ratio in terms of, uh, performance on the number of data you can store, Uh is very high. Okay, so that's that's another challenge that we're addressing. Of course, God is not the only solution, but it's another another one. >>Excellent. Okay, we're gonna leave it there. Cedric, Thanks so much. A great storey and really appreciate your insights. >>You're welcome. Thank you very much. >>Okay, that's it for today. I hope you've enjoyed the application. Modernisation summit made possible by Couch Base. We shared some fresh survey data and got the perspectives of three expert analysts. We got an outstanding roadmap from Ravi Meyer. Um, who's the CEO of Couch base? And of course, we got the customer angle from Cedric. So look, Maybe you're an organisation going through a modernisation initiative. And if you're thinking about what the future of applications looks like cheque out couch. Based on the road this summer, the application modernisation summit is hitting the road traversing North America and Europe. Find out where they will be where they will be near you by visiting couch based dot com slash roadshow. Ravi is gonna be there along with other thought leaders and peers who will be sharing learnings and best practises on how to modernise now and for the future. And you'll get a chance to interact with some of those piers, something that everyone I know is looking forward to. This is Day Volonte. Thanks for joining us today. And thanks for watching the Cube. Mhm. Yeah. Mm, yeah.
SUMMARY :
In our next session, And we'll learn about Amdocs modernisation journey and how it added value Welcome. So describe your modern application, So, actually, Amdocs is one of the leader in this kind of digital So of course you talk about this as and BS. Uh, so So it's it's real product that needs to be very flexible. So you had a lot of experience and and legacy with Oracle and Web logic. and and And this will skill, you know, very rapidly. That's always, you know, you know, a challenge. uh, you know, in our strategy, for all the reasons I mentioned right, You know, this notion that 90 per you really re platform 90% of your uh, micro services architecture because this is the only way you will have the business So if I If I summarised, it sounds like your top three requirements would be flexibility, I mean the fact that now you know, with micro services architecture, So you don't doesn't require the labour that it might have 10 years even know how we can be sure that, uh, you know, issues that we we and actually kind of reclaim, you know, some of that that value that they've lost be able to have very ideal city note, you know, sense that they with a Okay, we're gonna leave it there. Thank you very much. Find out where they will be where they will be near you
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ravi Meyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Amdocs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cédric Gégout | PERSON | 0.99+ |
95% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
90% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
more than 300 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cedric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cedric Jay Gould | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than 8000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ravi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Couch base | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two challenges | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
more than 95% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Arklow | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
60 years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
0 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.96+ |
three expert analysts | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
1 | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
more than | DATE | 0.86+ |
this summer | DATE | 0.85+ |
Couch Base | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Susan | PERSON | 0.8+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
application modernisation | EVENT | 0.76+ |
five g. | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
about five g | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
one place | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
90 per | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
top | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
five G | ORGANIZATION | 0.67+ |
Modernisation | EVENT | 0.66+ |
five g | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
Cube | TITLE | 0.54+ |
Basit | PERSON | 0.52+ |
Base | ORGANIZATION | 0.44+ |
Coach | PERSON | 0.43+ |
G | ORGANIZATION | 0.41+ |
Cloud City Live Kickoff with Danielle Royston | Cloud City Live 2021
>>Hello everyone. Thank you, add appreciating the studio. We're here at the cube here in cloud city telco DRS Cloud city. I'm Jeffrey Day Volonte. We're here for the next three days. Wall to wall live coverage. It's a physical event with a virtual program. It's hybrid. We're here with Daniel Royston, the Ceo of telco D. R. And the acting Ceo Toby, which is announced today. Great >>to see you. It's awesome to see you guys. >>Awesome to see how you doing, how you >>Feeling? I'm feeling congratulations. Right. 101 days ago, I didn't even think this doesn't exist. Right. And we got in contact with you guys and we said we knew there was always going to be a big virtual component and we invited you guys and here we are together. It's insane. >>Well we did the preview videos, but we're kind of walking through and document in the early stages. It all came together beautifully spectacular For the folks watching behind us is the most spectacular build out clouds. It's an ecosystem open concept. It feels like the Apple store meets paradise. Of course. We got the cube here in the set and we got the studio with all the command and control of adam there. So I gotta ask you with the connected keynotes going on right now. The connected world. Yeah. It's connected. We all know that everyone knows that what's, what's different now real quick before we get into the program, what's going on? >>Yeah. I think a big part of my messages and advocating it's more than just the network, Right? And I think telcos forever have relied on. That's all it is. That's what it's about. And I'm like, nope, you guys got to start focusing on your subscribers, right? And so the over the top players keep coming in and siphoning away their revenue and it's time for them to start focusing on us, right and making experience great. And I think that's what this is all about. >>So we're gonna get the news but I want to toss it to Katie. The roving reporter is going to give it a detail on how it all came together. So Katie take it away. >>Mhm We're here in Barcelona and so excited to be back in this beautiful city over at the convention center. The team is working hard putting the finishing touches to tell Cody are amazing cloud city booth at MwC Barcelona 2021. I'm sure you know the story of how this all came together as one of the biggest vendors Erickson pulled out of M. W. C. With just over 100 days until the start of the event. When this happened last year, it kicked off a tidal wave of departures and MwC was called off this year. We all wondered if MWC was going to be cancelled again and that's when Daniel Royston Ceo of Telco D. R. And Tito G swooped in and took over the booth all 6000 square meters of it. The plan turn the booth into cloud city, the epicenter of public cloud innovation at MWC crews have been working around the clock. Over 100 and 50 people have been on this construction site for over three weeks with covid testing every day to prevent outbreaks during the build and in 100 days, it's become just that Cloud city has over 30 vendors presenting over 70 demos with 24 private meeting areas. Cloud City Live is a virtual showcase and live broadcast studio featuring 50 guests from cloud Thought leaders around the world. They have telepresence robots for a more personalized experience and the Cloud city quest game with a chance to win more than $100,000 to gain access to live streams of our nightly concerts with rosario flores and rock legend Jon bon Jovi. And don't forget to visit cloud city dot telco D R dot com to join in on the fun Daniel Royston and Nacho Gomez, founder and Ceo of one of the key vendors in the construction of the booth gave us a behind the scenes tour of the booth. >>Nacho. We did it. Yeah, we did. It can't even touch because of Covid. Yeah, but look what we did. But right, 100 days ago I called and I said I'm taking over the Ericsson booth. What did you think? I know you were crazy but just a little bit crazy, realized that you were mortgages than I thought. So at the very, at the very beginning I thought, yeah, she's crazy. But then I couldn't sleep that night. But the next uh then I realized that it was a very good it's a great idea. Yeah super smart. So yeah we're gonna show everyone toward the booth. Yeah let's go. Let's go. Okay So how do we build such an amazing, beautiful building now? So this is we've made building inside a book. So it was very hard to find a glassful of facade. The roof is around 24 tones. Yeah so it's crazy crazy but we made it work and it's totally amazing. Yeah. Do you want to go to tragedy life? Do let's go. Okay so here we are Cloud city live. I know we're producing a whole live streaming tv show. We always knew because of covid that not everyone will be able to come to Mwc as we wanted to make sure that people can learn about the public cloud. So over here we have the keynote stage, we're gonna have awesome speakers talking all throughout M. W. C. People from AWS Microsoft, google vendors companies. So really really great content. And then over there we have the cube interviewing people again 15 minute segments, live streaming but also available on demand. And you can find all of this content on cloud city. Tell Cody are calm and it's available for anyone to you. Well, a lot of content. And what about the roberts? I never get them out. Come on. We remember 100 days ago we were locked down. So we came up with the idea of having robots for the people who cannot attend in person. I know right. We always knew that there was gonna be a big virtual component to MWC this year. So we bought 100 telepresence robots. It's a great way to have a more personal experience inside the boot. Just sign up for one on cloud city dot telco D r dot com and you can control it yourself. Right? So today we have Nikki with us, who's dialing in from the Philippines in Manila? Hello, Nicky. Hi there, how are you? I were great. Can you show us a twirl all gaining on us? Super cool. Yeah, it is. What an experience. So Nikki robots are not the only cool thing we have in cloud city. We also have super awesome concert. We have rosario flores on monday. Who's a latin grammy award winner. We have Jon bon Jovi, Jon bon Jovi on Tuesday, can't be changing telephone that a little bit of rock n roll and that's Tuesday. And on Wednesday we have DJ official, it's going to be a super party. Now if you play our cloud city quest on cloud city telco D R dot com you can participate in a live streaming concert and so I know a lot of people out there have been a lockdown. Haven't been able to be going to concerts. Things from austin texas, which is the live music capital of the world, How to have music. It would be so exciting is gonna be great. I'm getting hungry. Why don't we go to the restaurant? Let's go eat. Let's go. Yeah, Here is our awesome restaurant. I know it's called Cloud nine. Right? It's a place to come and sit down and relax now. Barcelona is known for its great food and I'm a foodie. So we had to have a restaurant. Should we go check out my secret bar? Let's go. Mhm. Yeah, here >>thanks to a R. And thank you Nacho if you're watching this at home, I'm so sorry you can't join us in person. However, let's not forget this is a hybrid event meaning we're bringing all the public cloud action right to you wherever in the world you might be. This includes the Pact cloud city live program. We've partnered with the cube Silicon angle Media's live streaming video studio to make sure that all of the keynotes, panel discussions, demos, case studies interviews and way more are available on demand so you can watch them whenever and wherever you want or you can live stream and enjoy all things cloud city as and when they happen. So for those of you not able to join us in, Barcelona, be sure to log in to cloud city live and catch all the action and don't miss the awesome concert Tuesday night with Jon bon Jovi available for free. If you participate in our cloud city quest game, I'll be here throughout MWc bringing you reports and updates. Stay >>tuned. Yeah. >>Mhm. Okay, we're back here on the cube on the floor at mobile world congress in cloud city telco DRS clouds. They were here with D. R. Of telco, D R. Danielle Rice and great to see you back, we're back. So the keynotes going on connected world, the big news here, I'll see the open shift that's happening is going open. Open ran, it's been a big thing. Open ran alliance. You're starting to see the industry come together around this clear mandate that applications are gonna be cloud native and the public cloud is just coming in like a big wave and people are gonna be driftwood or they'll be surfing the wave. Yeah, this is what's happening. >>Yeah, I think public cloud is an unstoppable megatrend. It's hit every other industry regulated industries like banking, right? Top secret industries like government. They all use the public cloud tells us the last, you know, standing old school industry and it's coming and I don't think we could have had an MWc without talking about open man. That's the other major shift. And so we're bringing both of those ideas here together in cloud city. So >>the big theme is telco transformation. Maybe we could start with the basics like paint a picture of what the telco infrastructure looks like, particularly the data center stuff because they all have big data centers >>because that's >>those are the candidates to go into the cloud explained to the audience. >>Well, do you have a time machine? I think if any of us were in tech in the late 90s and early 2000s, that's what telcos like today. Right. So for people outside of the industry don't know right there mostly still managing their own data centers, they're just sort of adopting virtualization. Some of the more advanced telcos are mostly virtualized public cloud. Is this idea that like this advanced thought and so yeah, I mean things are on premise, things are in silom, things don't use a P. I. S there all integrated with custom code. And so the transformation, we can all see it because we've lived it in other industries. And I'm bringing that to telco and say come along for the ride. It totally works and it's gonna be amazing. >>So it's hardened purpose built infrastructure. Okay. That ultimately parts of that need to go to the public cloud. Right. What parts do you see going first? >>I think all of it. Really. Yeah. And I think when you look at like dish in the W. S. Which was an announcement that came out about two months ago. Right. I mean dish was doing all these are FPs. Everyone knew about it. They were looking for a cloud native software and no one knew what they were. They knew a big part was open man. But their coupling open ran with AWS and deploying their parts of their network onto the public cloud and the whole industry is like wait we thought this was years away, right? Or number two, you're crazy. And I'm saying this is what I've been talking about guys. This is exactly what you can do, leverage the Capex over. Let's see. I think Amazon did $100 billion 2020 right, leverage that Capex for yourself. Get that infinite scalability right? It's going to, well we >>have, we have a saying here in the queue, we just made this up called D. R. That's your initial tucker. The digital revolution and the three Rs reset re platform and re factor. I think the observation we're seeing is that you're coming in with the narrative what everyone's kind of like they're waking up because they have to reset and then re platform with the cloud. But the opportunity is gonna be the re factoring, You're seeing the public cloud, do that already with the Enterprise Enterprises. Already re factoring has done that. Already done that now. Telcos the last area to be innovated by the cloud. >>Yeah, I think there's old school big, we're kind of on a hollowed ground here in the Ericsson booth that I took over, right? They bailed and I kind of made fun of them. I was like, they don't have anything to say, right, They're not going to go to the show. I'm like, this is this is a revolution that's happening in telco and I don't think the big guys are really interested in rewriting their software that frankly makes them billions and billions of dollars of revenue. And I'm like to use the public cloud. All of the software needs to be rewritten needs to be re factored and you've got to start training your teams on how to use it. They don't have any capability. The telcos, in terms of those skills hire the right people, retrain your teams, move your applications, rewrite them. And I think that's what we're talking, this is not a short journey, this is a 10 year journey. So >>let's fast forward to the future a little bit because when I look around cloud city, I see ecosystem everywhere. So as you well know, the telcos have generally done a poor job of attacking adjacent seas. So my question is can they go beyond should they go beyond connectivity or is that going to be the role of the ecosystem? >>Yeah, I think it's time that the telco starts to focus on their subscriber, right? It's been really easy for them to rely on the oligopoly of the network, Right? The network, we live in the United States, we see the 18 T Verizon T mobile five G network, five G network. Like what about us? Right. And it's really easy for the over the top players right, that come in and they're always, telcos are always complaining about being coming dumb pipes and I'm like, you don't focus on the customer, we would rather buy from an Apple and amazon if they provided a mobile service because the customer experience will be better. Right? They need to start focusing on us. They have great businesses but they want to make them better. They need to start focusing on the subscriber, so >>it's a partnership with the ecosystem then for them to go beyond just straight connectivity because you're right, those are the brands that we want to do business >>with. You know, there was a great survey, Peter Atherton who will be talking as a speaker I think um I can't remember when he's talking but he was talking about how there was a survey done, where would you rather get your mobile service from? And it had a couple of big names in telco and then of course the obvious, you know, consumer brands, the ones that we all know and it was like overwhelmingly would rather buy from an amazon or an apple. And I'm like, this is like if you guys don't change, right, if telco doesn't change they keep rolling out 60 and blah blah blah. It's about the network and I don't start making about the subscriber right? Those revenues are going to continue to erode and they just sit there and complain about the O. T. T. Players. Like it's time to fight back. Yeah, I own the subscriber >>relationship. It's a digital revolution and I think This event really encapsulates in my mind this hybrid world here because it's physical events back. It's been since 2019 winter that this event actually happened. >>Well no it was even longer than, well I guess winter it was February of 19, right? And so like you look at ericsson and some of the big names that dropped out of the show, the time they come back, three years will have passed three years, right? This is how you feel your sales funnel is how you connect with your customers right? Tokyo is a very global, you know experience and so you gotta, you gotta get in front of people and you got to talk a >>lot of change to its happened, look at just what public clouds done in 2.5 years. You imagine three years being just >>gone, right? And I think a lot of people back to edition A. W. S. I think the industry was a little bit surprised by that announcement. So I've been telling executives if you were surprised by that, if you think that's, you know, if you don't know how that's gonna work, you need to come to cloud cities, you start meeting all the vendors are here. We have over 30 vendors, 70 demos, right? People who are pushing the technology forward, you need to learn what's going on here. We have several dish vendors here. Come learn about open rand, come learn about public cloud. So >>we're tight on time today, but we're going to have you back and we want to get into the tech, Get it to open, ran a little bit, get into what 5G and beyond and how we're going to take advantage of that and monetize it and what that all means. >>And also we want to hear what's going on the hallways. I know you got a lot of your key noting, you're gonna be a lot of events, the yacht. You've got a lot of briefings, >>yep. Yeah, I've already had two meetings this morning. I shot a video. Um, I met with one of the world's largest groups and I met with a tiny little super app company. Right? So running the gamut, doing everything reporter >>now, we could be like our roaming >>reporter. You know, I love, I love talking to execs and telco getting their perspective on what is public cloud and where are they going, what are they thinking about? And you talked to people who really, really get it and you get people who are just nascent and everywhere in between and I love mwc it's going great. >>Daniel Rose and you are a digital revolution telco DDR. There's amazing. Davis has been fantastic. Again for the folks watching, this is a hybrid events, there's an online component and we're reaching out with our remote interviews to get people brought in and we're shipping this content out to the masses all over the world. It's gonna be really amazing cube coverages here. It's gonna be rocking you guys are doing great. I just want to give you a compliment that you guys just did an amazing job. And of course we've got adam in the studio with the team. So adam, I'm gonna pass it off back to you in the studio
SUMMARY :
We're here at the cube here in cloud city telco It's awesome to see you guys. And we got in contact with you guys and we We got the cube here in the set and we got the studio with all the command and control And I'm like, nope, you guys got to start focusing on your subscribers, The roving reporter is going to give it a detail on how it all came together. for a more personalized experience and the Cloud city quest game with a chance to win So we came up with the idea of having robots for the thanks to a R. And thank you Nacho if you're watching this at home, I'm so sorry you can't join Yeah. D R. Danielle Rice and great to see you back, we're back. and it's coming and I don't think we could have had an MWc without talking about open man. Maybe we could start with the basics like paint a picture of what And I'm bringing that to telco and say come along for parts of that need to go to the public cloud. And I think when you look at like dish in the W. S. But the opportunity is gonna be the re factoring, You're seeing the public cloud, do that already with the Enterprise Enterprises. All of the software needs to be rewritten So as you well know, the telcos have generally done a poor job of And it's really easy for the over the top players And I'm like, this is like if you guys don't change, right, if telco doesn't change they keep rolling It's a digital revolution and I think This event really encapsulates in my mind this lot of change to its happened, look at just what public clouds done in 2.5 years. And I think a lot of people back to edition A. W. S. I think the industry was a little bit surprised we're tight on time today, but we're going to have you back and we want to get into the tech, Get it to open, I know you got a lot of your key noting, you're gonna be a lot of events, So running the gamut, doing everything reporter And you talked to people who really, So adam, I'm gonna pass it off back to you in the studio
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Katie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon bon Jovi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Atherton | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Daniel Royston | PERSON | 0.99+ |
amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Danielle Royston | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Daniel Rose | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Wednesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nacho Gomez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
70 demos | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nacho | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
D. R. | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nicky | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Philippines | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tuesday | DATE | 0.99+ |
24 private meeting areas | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tuesday night | DATE | 0.99+ |
Silicon angle Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
more than $100,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
D R. Danielle Rice | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Davis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$100 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2.5 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
early 2000s | DATE | 0.99+ |
Manila | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
100 days ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tito G | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
over three weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
late 90s | DATE | 0.98+ |
telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Ceo | PERSON | 0.98+ |
two meetings | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
6000 square meters | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Daniel Royston Ceo | PERSON | 0.98+ |
over 70 demos | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
50 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
M. W. C. | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
MWC | EVENT | 0.98+ |
February of 19 | DATE | 0.98+ |
over 30 vendors | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
monday | DATE | 0.97+ |
over 100 days | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
101 days ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
Nikki | PERSON | 0.97+ |
100 telepresence robots | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
60 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Cloud city quest game | TITLE | 0.96+ |
big | EVENT | 0.96+ |
Tokyo | LOCATION | 0.95+ |
BOS6 Rob High VTT
>>from >>around the >>globe, it's the >>Cube with digital coverage of IBM, think 2020 >>one brought to you by IBM. >>Welcome back to the cubes coverage of IBM think 2021 we're gonna talk about the Edge like what is the Edge, how it's going to evolve? And we're gonna take a look at an autonomous vessel use case, which is quite interesting with me is rob high and IBM fellow VP and Cto, IBM edge computing rob. Welcome. It's great to see you again. >>Thanks. Dave appreciate that. Good seeing you too. >>Yeah, So let's start with the basic question here, you know, people are like, well what is the Edge? Like it's one big thing and it's not, it's, it's many things, but how should we think about the edge and why should enterprises, you know, feel like it's necessary to begin to lean in? >>Well, let's just start with the use cases. Uh, you know, what edge means is the ability to put a camera on the manufacturing floor, you know, perhaps juxtaposed with a robot monitoring the work that the robot is doing using ai visual recognition to detect whether what that robot is doing is producing high quality parts or not. And to be able to do that in real time to be able to use that analytic then too, you know, quickly remediate any kind of quality issues, helps lower cost, it helps increase your yield and it helps increase the overall efficiency of your production processes. Or if not that, then putting it in something that's perhaps a bit more familiar to us. The idea of an autonomous vehicle, you know, be able to, you know, dr and do driver assistance to driver safety kinds of features, you know, all of that requires compute and having that compute where people are actually performing these tasks based on the data that they're receiving at the moment they receive it be able to process that real time, give them the feedback that allows them to make better decisions to be able to do that not only with lower latency, but actually with better protection of their data, better protection of their personal information or private information. If you're thinking about the business in which they operate, you know, be able to do that even when the network fails to be able to do that without necessarily have to transmit tons and tons of data back to the cloud, especially if you end up not actually using that anywhere. That's what as computing really means. >>Yeah. So it sounds like the edges, maybe we shouldn't think of it as a place, but the most logical place to process the data of, depending on late and see and other factors. It's that's a good way to look at it. So it's >>yeah, just where we do our work. >>Yeah. Well you do the work, right. That that makes a lot of sense. Thank you for that. So you know, we always we're talking about the pandemic, changing the way we think about things. And I wonder if you can comment on the the edge context as we come back From we work from home or remote work. You know, I think 2022, we hope it's going to be face to face. Uh good edge play a part in that. Has the pandemic uh made you think differently about the opportunities that edge? >>Yeah. And in fact what we've seen is the pandemic is actually beginning to accelerate digital transformation. If you think about it, you know any store they wanted to survive. This pandemic could only do so by basically introducing a digital presence, you know, the ability to buy online. And even if you're picking up at the store, picking up the curbside, you know you can't go into a restaurant without getting that Q. R. Code that gives you your digital menu. Um Trying to get workers back into factories as well as the warehouses and offices. And to do so safely be able to ensure that they're wearing their face masks and socially distancing properly. All of these things I think have driven digital transformation. And if you think about the task of buying online and picking up the store well stories better have a pretty good idea of where their inventory is. Um They need to know exactly where that product is. So they can quickly pick it and get it available to the client before they arrive at the store. Um And so that's edge computing. We need edge computing to be able to to automate the processes of inventory tracking down to individual items and where they're located throughout the store. To be able to do the recognition for whether people are or not maintaining social distancing or wearing the PP. E. Um to be able to ensure that our processes or as automated as possible to limit the amount of human interaction that's required in order to perform these processes. All of that I think has accelerated both digital transformation as well as particularly the use of edge computing uh in all of our businesses. >>I think about, you know, the force marched to digital in 2020 and if you weren't a digital business you were out of business. But you're my big takeaway from what you just said is a digital transformation is just starting. And now people really have some time to think about that, that digital strategy and and as we think about doing things you know more safely, maybe with less human intervention, we love autonomous vehicles. Examples, just because they're technically they're challenging. But I wonder if you could tell us the story of the Mayflower autonomous ship, its upcoming journey, it's going to be cruelest across the atlantic, unbelievable collecting data. You know, talk about how edge relates to that story. What can you tell us? >>Well, first of all, this is simply talk about the task of navigating a ship from one port on one side of the world too, another port across the ocean, across the atlantic. Um you know, the ocean is a dangerous place. Yes, it's wide open, it's you know, lots of water, but the reality is it's full of barriers. Of course, you've got land barriers, you've got other ships, you've got marine life, you've got debris that gets dropped in the ocean. And so the task of navigating is actually quite difficult. And again, to the same point that we made earlier, you have to have local compute in order to really be able to make those decisions fast enough with enough acuity with enough clarity to be able to be able to safely safely navigate around those kinds of obstacles. So we have to put compute in the ship. So the may fire ship is as I sort of implied a ship that will be autonomous. There are no human beings involved in in operating the ship. It has to be able to on its own. Both recognize these obstacles, recognizing the ship, recognize about, recognize um, you know, that cargo, uh, container that happened to have fallen off some other ships and floating through the ocean, recognize, you know, rain life, uh, whales and other other fish and birds that might be, uh, in the way. Um, and, and, and to be able to um, do all that, you know, entirely without any human invention. So that compute power is really a prime example of an edge computer. It is compute in the, in the business of navigation, making decisions about the things that it sees and making decisions about how best to circumvent those issues. Um, Now along the way, I should also say part of what the Mayflower ship that's going to do is not only exercise the task of navigation and prove that these algorithms can efficiently and effectively bring that shit from one side of the world to the other side safely. But along the way, it's going to conduct science is going to collect water samples for the chemical makeup of the oceans. At various points along the way it's going to be sampling for microplastics are examining phytoplankton for its health and liveliness. It's going to be the detecting wave motions and the wave energy that might be indicative of how the world is transforming in the presence of global climate change. Um These science packages that are going to be formed are also being performed autonomously without inhuman invention. And that actually opens up a very exciting potential future, which is the idea of these autonomous ships navigating the oceans, collecting data that can then be brought back for the scientists to examine so that they the scientists are not having to go out and spend weeks and months at a time in these perilous conditions, these potentially lonely conditions um collecting that data, but rather they can remain safely on land. The ship will collect the data and they can analyze that data from their home labs. So this is actually a really exciting project, but one that I think will demonstrate not only the idea that computing, but also the advances in navigation and marine science. >>Yeah, because I mean the ship has to navigate itself. Not only is it bringing back data, but there's a great, great example. I mean a lot of the work in machine intelligence today is uh in the modeling side. This is this is this is inference going on in near real time, uh which we think is where the action is. That's why we love the autonomous because there's a lot of IBM tech involved in here as well. Is there not? I mean, you've got to have software and you've got your edge devices, you've got, you know, automation capabilities. I mean, it's not all right. This is like serious technical challenge. >>Yeah. Well, we were approached by the primary team on this project and it didn't take us long to realize the utility that some of our technology would have to dancing their project. And so you're right. I mean, we have things like operations, decision and ODM which typically is used in the things of the services industry, but now it's being applied to the rules of navigation would call the cold cold rags. Um We've got our Ai services that do visual recognition because obviously we've got to be able to detect and identify um, the things that the ship is seeing along the way and be able to distinguish what those things are. Uh we have our imagine application manager which is being used to manage deployment of these kinds of workloads and frankly all of the workloads that are hosted in the ship, getting that managed and deployed onto the ship. Uh and and of course, you know, all these things have to be integrated. And so that's just a small sampling of the kinds of technologies. But it's a good example of where I think the edge kind of represents the culmination of what we have all been working within this industry, which is how do we bring technologies together to solve a problem as an integrated solution? >>You mentioned financial services. So I wonder if we could, you know, think beyond shipping, maybe what, what are you seeing in other industries? Are there any patterns that are developing, where clients are saying, hey, we need this sort of this capability? What can you tell us? >>So, I think it is, it's probably greatest demand right now in manufacturing, uh, in industrial 4.0, uh, kinds of environments where, you know, most of the industry, the industrial industries and markets have grown up largely dependent upon operations technology. Ot but one of the things that people need in these kind of environments is the additional benefits that come from A. I and we talked about using ai to do visual recognition on manufacturing processes, looking at quality inspection, for example, but there's other aspects of production optimization of workers safety. We talked a little bit about that around uh, predictive maintenance and asset management. Uh, you know, these kinds of additional things that are necessary to really to run your factory efficiently or you're you're drilling rig or your energy production systems. All these kinds of industrial processes can benefit from the advances that are occurring in analytics. And um, and, and then of course, having localized compute to do that with, to both do these kinds of decisions in real time, but also to offload the amount of transmission that we end up transmitting back to the cloud. So industry 40 or manufacturing is one big area retail. We talked about that, but you think about point of sale terminals and the idea of being able to do offers at point of sale to be able to do price checking to help you navigate the stores, digital signage. Um, you know, all the user experiences, spillage and spoilage and loss prevention. These are all kinds of use cases that will benefit retail retailers. Um, lot demand, of course. Again, the need to be able to do that locally within the store. We talked to touch a little bit on automotive. The whole automotive industry right now is going through a really fundamental transformation where virtually every automobile now is being imbued with more and more compute capacity and localized processing for doing driver safety and car maintenance and, and, and even short of, you know, full autonomy, which is of course is another topic in its own right. Uh lots of experiences that can be brought there as well. So lots of opportunity and distribution, manufacturing, retail banking. Virtually every industry that we've looked at has some opportunity for leveraging the benefits of the computer. Yeah, >>it's hard to get cars right now because the chip shortest. But I wonder real quick if you could talk about five G, you hear a lot about five Gs tons of hype there. How should we be thinking about 5G? How real is it? What's your take in terms of its impact on the edge? >>So a couple of thoughts here, one is 5G obviously is accelerating And it has the effect of accelerating edge computing because one of the benefits of 5G of course is lower latency and higher bandwidth. And that opens people's minds. The potential to leverage the network connectivity of equipment that otherwise is hard to connect. If you think about the factory floor for a moment and all the kinds of equipment you have on the factory floor. If you had to hardwire all that equipment to get access to the compute power on that, that could be a very expensive proposition. You'd like to kind of wirelessly connect that equipment and that's one of things that five day brings to the table because some of the spectrum five take uses has less potential to interfere with that equipment than than you would otherwise. So I think that what we're going to see is 5G will disproportionately benefit. I'll call him industrial or commercial use cases as compared to four G. And L. T. Which were very much centered on consumer use case five Gs accelerating edge computing in many ways Five G actually depends on edge computing doesn't mean that we can't do edge computing without five do we can we can certainly do it for dlt even wire line But I think 5G is going to have a very symbiotic effect on edge computing. >>Yeah just like wifi was enabler mobile but this is much much much larger potential rob. We gotta go. Thanks so much for coming on and sharing your insights. I'd love to have you back, awesome. Thanks. >>Alright appreciate it. Thank >>you for watching everybody's Day Volonte for the cubes coverage of IBM. Think 2020 21 2021 will be right back. >>Yeah. >>Yeah.
SUMMARY :
It's great to see you again. Good seeing you too. to put a camera on the manufacturing floor, you know, to process the data of, depending on late and see and other factors. So you know, E. Um to be able to ensure that our processes or as automated as I think about, you know, the force marched to digital in 2020 and if you weren't a digital business and, and, and to be able to um, do all that, you know, Yeah, because I mean the ship has to navigate itself. you know, all these things have to be integrated. So I wonder if we could, you know, think beyond shipping, Again, the need to be able to do that locally within the store. it's hard to get cars right now because the chip shortest. potential to interfere with that equipment than than you would otherwise. I'd love to have you back, awesome. Alright appreciate it. you for watching everybody's Day Volonte for the cubes coverage of IBM.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one port | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one side | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Edge | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.97+ |
five day | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.93+ |
tons and tons of data | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.87+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Rob | PERSON | 0.86+ |
atlantic | LOCATION | 0.85+ |
one big | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
40 | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
one big area | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
phytoplankton | OTHER | 0.73+ |
Day Volonte | EVENT | 0.73+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
5G | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
Five G | TITLE | 0.65+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.63+ |
Cto | ORGANIZATION | 0.6+ |
rob | PERSON | 0.58+ |
Q. R. | TITLE | 0.55+ |
industry | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
five G | ORGANIZATION | 0.51+ |
five Gs | TITLE | 0.48+ |
L. T. | ORGANIZATION | 0.42+ |
five | OTHER | 0.4+ |
21 | DATE | 0.36+ |
G. | TITLE | 0.31+ |
four | ORGANIZATION | 0.3+ |
5G | TITLE | 0.29+ |
Mayflower | PERSON | 0.25+ |
Roel Sijstermans, Netherlands Cancer Institute | Accelerating Next
>>Okay we're here on the cube covering H. P. E. Accelerating next and with me is Rule Sister Mons, who was the head of it at the Netherlands Cancer Institute also known as NK I welcome rule. >>Thank you very much. Great to be here. >>Hey what can you tell us about the Netherlands Cancer Institute? Maybe you could talk about your core principles and and and also if you could weave in your specific areas of expertise. >>Yeah maybe first introduction to the National Cancer Institute. We are one of the top 10 comprehensive cancers in the world. And what we do is we combine a hospital for treating patients with cancer and research institute under one roof. So the discoveries we do we find within the research. We can easily bring them back to the clinic and and visa versa. So um we have about 750 researchers and about 3000 other employees, doctors, nurses and and my role is to facilitate them at their best with I. T. >>Got it. So I mean everybody talks about digital digital transformation to us that it all comes down to data. So curious how you collect and take advantage of medical data specifically to support NK eyes goals. Maybe some of the challenges that your organization faces with the amount of data, the speed of data coming in. Just the the complexities of data. How do you handle that? >>Yeah it's it's it's a challenge and uh what we we have we have a really a large amount of data so we produce uh terabytes today and we have stored now one petabyte of data at this moment. And it's uh the challenge is to reuse the data optimal for research and to share it with other institutions. So that needs to have a flexible infrastructure for that. So a fast really fast network big data storage environment. But the real challenge is not so much the I. T. But is more the quality of the data. So we have a lot of medical systems all producing those data and how do we combine them and you get the data fair. So findable accessible, interoperable and reusable for research purposes. So I think that's the main shell is the quality of the data. >>Very common themes that we hear from from other customers. I wonder if you could paint a picture of your environment and maybe you can share where HP solutions fit in what what value they bring to your organization's mission. >>Yeah I think it it brings a lot of flexibility. So what we did with HP. Es. That we we developed a software defined data center and then a virtual workplace for our researchers and doctors and that that's based on the HB infrastructure. And what we wanted to build is something that I expect the needs of doctors and nurses, but also the researchers and to kind of different blood groups, blood groups and with different needs. So, uh but we wanted to create one infrastructure because we wanted to make the connection between the hospital and research that's that's more important. So uh HPD helped helped us not only with the infrastructure itself, but also designing and the whole architecture of it. And for example, what we did is we bought a lot of hardware and and and the hardware is really doing his job between 9 to 5 Dennis, everything is working within, everyone is working with an institution, but all the other time in the evening and and nine hours and also the redundant environment we have for for our health care that doesn't do nothing of uh much more less uh in those uh dark hours. So, but we we created together with A V N H B and B M R, is that we we we call it Fidel today, compute by night. So we re use those uh those servers and those Gpu capacity for computational research jobs within the research. >>That's how you mentioned flexibility for this genius. And and so we're talking, you said a lot of hardware probably reliant, I think synergy Aruba networking is in there. How are you using this environment? Actually, the question really is when you think about NK eyes digital transformation, I mean, is this sort of the fundamental platform that you're using? Is it a maybe you could describe that? >>Yeah, it's the fundamental platform to work on. And what we see is that we have we have now everything in place for it. But the real challenge is, is the next steps we are in. So we have a software defined data center, we are cloud ready. So the next step is to make the connection to the cloud to give more automation to our researchers. So they don't have to wait a couple of weeks for I. T. To do it but they can do it themselves with a couple of clicks. So I think the basic is is we are really flexible and we have a lot of opportunities for automation for example. But the next step is to create that the business value really for for our employees. >>That's a great story and a very important mission. Really fascinating stuff. Thanks for sharing this with our audience today. Really appreciate your time. >>Thank you very much. >>Okay, this is Day Volonte with the cube stay right there for more great content. You're watching accelerating next from HP.
SUMMARY :
P. E. Accelerating next and with me is Rule Sister Mons, Thank you very much. Maybe you could talk about your core So the discoveries we do we find within the research. So curious how you collect and take advantage of medical data specifically to support the challenge is to reuse the data optimal for research and to share I wonder if you could paint a picture of your environment and in the evening and and nine hours and also the redundant environment we have for Actually, the question really is when you think about NK eyes digital transformation, So the next step is to make the connection to the cloud Thanks for sharing this with our audience today. Okay, this is Day Volonte with the cube stay right there for more great content.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
National Cancer Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Netherlands Cancer Institute | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Roel Sijstermans | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
HPD | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one petabyte | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine hours | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 750 researchers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
NK | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Rule | PERSON | 0.91+ |
one roof | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.87+ |
first introduction | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Mons | PERSON | 0.84+ |
A V N H B | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
one infrastructure | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
5 | DATE | 0.76+ |
I. T. | ORGANIZATION | 0.74+ |
B M R | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
Aruba | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
about 3000 other employees | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
10 comprehensive cancers | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
9 | DATE | 0.6+ |
Dennis | PERSON | 0.6+ |
top | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
data | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
Fidel | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
Maribel Lopez & Zeus Kerravala | theCUBE on Cloud 2021
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube presenting Cuban cloud brought >>to you by silicon angle. Okay, we're back. Here. Live Cuban Cloud. And this is Dave. Want with my co host, John Ferrier Were all remote. We're getting into the analyst power half hour. Really pleased to have Maribel Lopez here. She's the principal and founder of Lopez Research and Zias Caraballo, who is the principal and founder of ZK research. Guys, great to see you. Let's get into it. How you doing? >>Great. How you been? Good, >>thanks. Really good. John's hanging in there quarantining and, uh, all healthy, So I hope you guys are too. Hey, Mary, But let's start with you. You know, here we are on 2021 you know, just exited one of the strangest years, if not the strangest year of our lives. But looking back in the past decade of cloud and we're looking forward. How do you see that? Where do we come from? Where we at and where we going >>When we obviously started with the whole let's build a public cloud and everything was about public cloud. Uh, then we went thio the notion of private cloud than we had hybrid cloud and multi cloud. So we've done a lot of different clouds right now. And I think where we are today is that there's a healthy recognition on the cloud computing providers that you need to give it to the customers the way they want it, not the way you've decided to build it. So how do you meet them where they are so that they can have a cloud like experience wherever they want their data to be? >>Yes and yes, you've, you know, observed, This is well, in the early days of cloud, you heard a lot of rhetoric. It was private cloud And and then now we're, you know, hearing a lot of multi cloud and so forth. But initially, a lot of the traditional vendors kind of pooh poohed it. They called us analysts. We said we were all cloud crazy, but they seem to have got their religion. >>Well, everything. Everyone's got a definition of cloud, but I actually think we are right in the midst of another transformation of clouds Miracle talked about. We went from, you know, private clouds, which is really hosting the public cloud to multi cloud hybrid cloud. And if you look at the last post that put on Silicon Angle, which was talking about five acquisition of Volterra, I actually think we're in the midst of the transition to what's called distributed Club, where if you look at modernized cloud apps today, they're actually made up of services from different clouds on also distributed edge locations. And that's gonna have a pretty profound impact on the way we build out, because those distributed edges be a telco edge, cellular vagina. Th whatever the services that lived there are much more ephemeral in nature, right? So the way we secure the way we connect changes quite a bit. But I think that the great thing about Cloud is we've seen several several evolutionary changes. So what the definition is and we're going through that now, which is which is pretty cool to think about, right? It's not a static thing. Um, it's, uh, you know, it's a it's an ongoing transition. But I think, uh, you know, we're moving into this distributed Cloudera, which to me is a lot more complex than what we're dealing with in the Palace. >>I'm actually pretty excited about that because I think that this move toe edge and the distribution that you've talked about, it's like we now have processing everywhere. We've got it on devices, we've got it in, cars were moving, the data centers closer and closer to where the action's happening. And I think that's gonna be a huge trend for 2021. Is that distributed that you were talking about a lot of edge discussion? You >>know what? The >>reason we're doing This, too, is we want. It's not just we're moving the data closer to the user, right? And some. If you think you brought up the autonomous vehicle right in the car being an edge, you think of the data that generates right? There's some things such as the decision to stop or not right that should be done in car. I don't wanna transport that data all the way back to Google him back to decide whether I want to stop. You could also use the same data determine whether drivers driving safely for insurance purposes, right? So the same data give me located at the edge or in a centralized cloud for different purposes, and I think that's what you know, kind of cool about this is we're being able to use our data and much different ways. Now. >>You know, it's interesting is it's so complex. It's mind blowing because this is distributed computing. Everyone kind of agrees this is where it is. But if you think about the complexity and I want to get your guys reaction to this because you know some of the like side fringe trend discussions are data sovereignty, misinformation as a vulnerability. Okay, you get the chips now you got gravitas on with Amazon in front. Apple's got their own chips. Intel is gonna do a whole new direction. So you've got tons of computer. And then you mentioned the ephemeral nature. How do you manage those? What's the observe ability look like? They're what's the trust equation? So all these things kind of play into it. It sounds almost mind blowing, just even thinking about it. But how do you guys, this analyst tryto understand where someone's either blowing bullshit or kind of like has the real deal? Because all those things come into play? I mean, you could have a misinformation campaign targeting the car. Let's say Hey, you know that that data is needs to be. This is this is misinformation who's a >>in a lot of ways, this creates almost unprecedented opportunity now for for starts and for companies to transform right. The fundamental tenet of my research has always been share shifts happen when markets transition and we're in the middle of the big one. If the computer resource is we're using, John and the application resource will be using or ephemeral nature than all the things that surrounded the way we secured the way we connect. Those also have to be equal, equally agile, right, So you can't have, you know, you think of a micro services based application being secured with traditional firewalls, right? Just the amount of, or even virtual the way that the length of time it takes to spend those things up is way too long. So in many ways, this distributed cloud change changes everything in I T. And that that includes all of the services in the the infrastructure that we used to secure and connect. And that's a that is a profound change, and you mentioned the observe ability. You're right. That's another thing that the traditional observe ability tools are based on static maps and things and, you know, traditional up, down and we don't. Things go up and down so quickly now that that that those don't make any sense. So I think we are going to see quite a rise in different types of management tools and the way they look at things to be much more. I suppose you know Angela also So we can measure things that currently aren't measurable. >>So you're talking about the entire stack. Really? Changing is really what you're inferring anyway from your commentary. And that would include the programming model as well, wouldn't it? >>Absolutely. Yeah. You know, the thing that is really interesting about where we have been versus where we're going is we spent a lot of time talking about virtual izing hardware and moving that around. And what does that look like? And that, and creating that is more of a software paradigm. And the thing we're talking about now is what is cloud is an operating model look like? What is the manageability of that? What is the security of that? What? You know, we've talked a lot about containers and moving into a different you know, Dev suck ups and all those different trends that we've been talking about, like now we're doing them. So we've only got into the first crank of that. And I think every technology vendor we talked to now has to address how are they going to do a highly distributed management and security landscape? Like, what are they gonna layer on top of that? Because it's not just about Oh, I've taken Iraq of something server storage, compute and virtualized it. I now have to create a new operating model around it. In a way, we're almost redoing what the OS I stack looks like and what the software and solutions are for that. >>So >>it was really Hold on, hold on, hold on their lengthened. Because that side stack that came up earlier today, Mayor. But we're talking about Yeah, we were riffing on the OSC model, but back in the day and we were comparing the S n a definite the, you know, the proprietary protocol stacks that they were out there and someone >>said Amazon's S N a. Is that recall? E think that's what you said? >>No, no. Someone in the chest. That's a comment like Amazon's proprietary meaning, their scale. And I said, Oh, that means there s n a But if you think about it, that's kind of almost that can hang. Hang together. If the kubernetes is like a new connective tissue, is that the TCP pipe moment? Because I think Os I kind of was standardizing at the lower end of the stack Ethernet token ring. You know, the data link layer physical layer and that when you got to the TCP layer and really magic happened right to me, that's when Cisco's happened and everything started happening then and then. It kind of stopped because the application is kinda maintain their peace there. A little history there, but like that's kind of happening now. If you think about it and then you put me a factor in the edge, it just kind of really explodes it. So who's gonna write that software? E >>think you know, Dave, your your dad doesn't change what you build ups. It's already changed in the consumer world, you look atyou, no uber and Waze and things like that. Those absolute already highly decomposed applications that make a P I calls and DNS calls from dozens of different resource is already right. We just haven't really brought that into the enterprise space. There's a number, you know, what kind of you know knew were born in the cloud companies that have that have done that. But they're they're very few and far between today. And John, your point about the connectivity. We do need to think about connectivity at the network layer. Still, obviously, But now we're creating that standardization that standardized connectivity all the way a player seven. So you look at a lot of the, you know, one of the big things that was a PDP. I calls right, you know, from different cloud services. And so we do need to standardize in every layer and then stitch that together. So that does make It does make things a lot more complicated. Now I'm not saying Don't do it because you can do a whole lot more with absolute than you could ever do before. It's just that we kind of cranked up the level of complexity here, and flowered isn't just a single thing anymore, right? That's that. That's what we're talking about here It's a collection of edges and private clouds and public clouds. They all have to be stitched together at every layer in orderto work. >>So I was I was talking a few CEOs earlier in the day. We had we had them on, I was asking them. Okay, So how do you How do you approach this complexity? Do you build that abstraction layer? Do you rely on someone like Microsoft to build that abstraction layer? Doesn't appear that Amazon's gonna do it, you know? Where does that come from? Or is it or is it dozens of abstraction layers? And one of the CEO said, Look, it's on us. We have to figure out, you know, we get this a p I economy, but But you guys were talking about a mawr complicated environment, uh, moving so so fast. Eso if if my enterprise looks like my my iPhone APs. Yes, maybe it's simpler on an individual at basis, but its app creep and my application portfolio grows. Maybe they talk to each other a little bit better. But that level of complexity is something that that that users are gonna have to deal >>with what you thought. So I think quite what Zs was trying to get it and correct me if I'm wrong. Zia's right. We've got to the part where we've broken down what was a traditional application, right? And now we've gotten into a P. I calls, and we have to think about different things. Like we have to think about how we secure those a p I s right. That becomes a new criteria that we're looking at. How do we manage them? How do they have a life cycle? So what was the life cycle of, say, an application is now the life cycle of components and so that's a That's a pretty complex thing. So it's not so much that you're getting app creep, but you're definitely rethinking how you want to design your applications and services and some of those you're gonna do yourself and a lot of them are going to say it's too complicated. I'm just going to go to some kind of SAS cloud offering for that and let it go. But I think that many of the larger companies I speak to are looking for a larger company to help them build some kind of framework to migrate from what they've used with them to what they need tohave going forward. >>Yeah, I think. Where the complexities. John, You asked who who creates the normalization layer? You know, obviously, if you look to the cloud providers A W s does a great job of stitching together all things AWS and Microsoft does a great job of stitching together all things Microsoft right in saying with Google. >>But >>then they don't. But if if I want to do some Microsoft to Amazon or Google Toe Microsoft, you know, connectivity, they don't help so much of that. And that's where the third party vendors that you know aviatrix on the network side will tear of the security side of companies like that. Even Cisco's been doing a lot of work with those companies, and so what we what we don't really have And we probably won't for a while if somebody is gonna stitch everything together at every >>you >>know, at every layer. So Andi and I do think we do get after it. Maribel, I think if you look at the world of consumer APS, we moved to a lot more kind of purpose built almost throwaway apps. They serve a purpose or to use them for a while. Then you stop using them. And in the enterprise space, we really haven't kind of converted to them modeling on the mobile side. But I think that's coming. Well, >>I think with micro APS, right, that that was kind of the issue with micro APS. It's like, Oh, I'm not gonna build a full scale out that's gonna take too long. I'm just gonna create this little workflow, and we're gonna have, like, 200 work flows on someone's phone. And I think we did that. And not everybody did it, though, to your point. So I do think that some people that are a little late to the game might end up in in that app creep. But, hey, listen, this is a fabulous opportunity that just, you know, throw a lot of stuff out and do it differently. What What? I think what I hear people struggling with ah lot is be to get it to work. It typically is something that is more vertically integrated. So are you buying all into a Microsoft all you're buying all into an Amazon and people are starting to get a little fear about doing the full scale buy into any specific platform yet. In absence of that, they can't get anything to work. >>Yeah, So I think again what? What I'm hearing from from practitioners, I'm gonna put a micro serve. And I think I think, uh, Mirabelle, this is what you're implying. I'm gonna put a micro services layer. Oh, my, my. If I can't get rid of them, If I can't get rid of my oracle, you know, workloads. I'm gonna connect them to my modernize them with a layer, and I'm gonna impart build that. I'm gonna, you know, partner to get that done. But that seems to be a a critical path forward. If I don't take that step, gonna be stuck in the path in the past and not be able to move forward. >>Yeah, absolutely. I mean, you do have to bridge to the past. You you aren't gonna throw everything out right away. That's just you can't. You can't drive the bus and take the wheels off that the same time. Maybe one wheel, but not all four of them at the same time. So I think that this this concept of what are the technologies and services that you use to make sure you can keep operational, but that you're not just putting on Lee new workloads into the cloud or new workloads as decomposed APS that you're really starting to think about. What do I want to keep in whatever I want to get rid of many of the companies you speak Thio. They have thousands of applications. So are they going to do this for thousands of applications? Are they gonna take this as an opportunity to streamline? Yeah, >>well, a lot of legacy never goes away, right? And I was how companies make this transition is gonna be interesting because there's no there's no really the fact away I was I was talking to this one company. This is New York Bank, and they've broken their I t division down into modern I t and legacy I t. And so modern. Everything is cloud first. And so imagine me, the CEO of Legacy i e 02 miracles. But what they're doing, if they're driving the old bus >>and >>then they're building a new bus and parallel and eventually, you know, slowly they take seats out of the old bus and they take, you know, the seat and and they eventually start stripping away things. That old bus, >>But >>that old bus is going to keep running for a long time. And so stitching the those different worlds together is where a lot of especially big organizations that really can't commit to everything in the cloud are gonna struggle. But it is a It is a whole new world. And like I said, I think it creates so much opportunity for people. You know, e >>whole bus thing reminds me that movie speed when they drive around 55 miles an hour, just put it out to the airport and just blew up E >>got But you know, we all we all say that things were going to go away. But to Zia's point, you know, nothing goes away. We're still in 2021 talking about mainframes just as an aside, right? So I think we're going to continue tohave some legacy in the network. But the But the issue is ah, lot will change around that, and they're gonna be some people. They're gonna make a lot of money selling little startups that Just do one specific piece of that. You know, we just automation of X. Oh, >>yeah, that's a great vertical thing. This is the This is the distributed network argument, right? If you have a note in the network and you could put a containerized environment around it with some micro services um, connective tissue glue layer, if you will software abstract away some integration points, it's a note on the network. So if in mainframe or whatever, it's just I mean makes the argument right, it's not core. You're not building a platform around the mainframe, but if it's punching out, I bank jobs from IBM kicks or something, you know, whatever, Right? So >>And if those were those workloads probably aren't gonna move anywhere, right, they're not. Is there a point in putting those in the cloud? You could say Just leave them where they are. Put a connection to the past Bridge. >>Remember that bank when you talk about bank guy we interviewed in the off the record after the Cube interviews like, Yeah, I'm still running the mainframe, so I never get rid of. I love it. Run our kicks job. I would never think about moving that thing. >>There was a large, large non US bank who said I buy. I buy the next IBM mainframe sight unseen. Andi, he's got no choice. They just write the check. >>But milliseconds is like millions of dollars of millisecond for him on his back, >>so those aren't going anywhere. But then, but then, but they're not growing right. It's just static. >>No, no, that markets not growing its's, in fact. But you could make a lot of money and monetizing the legacy, right? So there are vendors that will do that. But I do think if you look at the well, we've already seen a pretty big transition here. If you look at the growth in a company like twilio, right, that it obviates the need for a company to rack and stack your own phone system to be able to do, um, you know, calling from mobile lapse or even messaging. Now you just do a P. I calls. Um, you know, it allows in a lot of ways that this new world we live in democratizes development, and so any you know, two people in the garage can start up a company and have a service up and running another time at all, and that creates competitiveness. You know much more competitiveness than we've ever had before, which is good for the entire industry. And, you know, because that keeps the bigger companies on their toes and they're always looking over their shoulder. You know what, the banks you're looking at? The venues and companies like that Brian figure out a way to monetize. So I think what we're, you know well, that old stuff never going away. The new stuff is where the competitive screen competitiveness screen. >>It's interesting. Um IDs Avery. Earlier today, I was talking about no code in loco development, how it's different from the old four g l days where we didn't actually expand the base of developers. Now we are to your point is really is democratizing and, >>well, everybody's a developer. It could be a developer, right? A lot of these tools were written in a way that line of business people create their own APs to point and click interface is, and so the barrier. It reminds me of when, when I started my career, I was a I. I used to code and HTML build websites and then went to five years. People using drag and drop interface is right, so that that kind of job went away because it became so easy to dio. >>Yeah, >>sorry. A >>data e was going to say, I think we're getting to the part. We're just starting to talk about data, right? So, you know, when you think of twilio, that's like a service. It's connecting you to specific data. When you think of Snowflake, you know, there's been all these kinds of companies that have crept up into the landscape to feel like a very specific void. And so now the Now the question is, if it's really all about the data, they're going to be new companies that get built that are just focusing on different aspects of how that data secured, how that data is transferred, how that data. You know what happens to that data, because and and does that shift the balance of power about it being out of like, Oh, I've created these data centers with large recommend stack ums that are virtualized thio. A whole other set of you know this is a big software play. It's all about software. >>Well, we just heard from Jim Octagon e You guys talking earlier about just distributed system. She basically laid down that look. Our data architectures air flawed there monolithic. And data by its very nature is distributed so that she's putting forth the whole new paradigm around distributed decentralized data models, >>which Howie shoe is just talking about. Who's gonna build the visual studio for data, right? So programmatic. Kind of thinking around data >>I didn't >>gathering. We didn't touch on because >>I do think there's >>an opportunity for that for, you know, data governance and data ownership and data transport. But it's also the analytics of it. Most companies don't have the in house, um, you know, data scientists to build on a I algorithms. Right. So you're gonna start seeing, you know, cos pop up to do very specific types of data. I don't know if you saw this morning, um, you know, uniforms bought this company that does, you know, video emotion detection so they could tell on the video whether somebody's paying attention, Not right. And so that's something that it would be eso hard for a company to build that in house. But I think what you're going to see is a rise in these, you know, these types of companies that help with specific types of analytics. And then you drop you pull those in his resource is into your application. And so it's not only the storage and the governance of the data, but also the analytics and the analytics. Frankly, there were a lot of the, uh, differentiation for companies is gonna come from. I know Maribel has written a lot on a I, as have I, and I think that's one of the more exciting areas to look at this year. >>I actually want to rip off your point because I think it's really important because where we left off in 2020 was yes, there was hybrid cloud, but we just started to see the era of the vertical eyes cloud the cloud for something you know, the cloud for finance, the cloud for health care, the telco and edge cloud, right? So when you start doing that, it becomes much more about what is the specialized stream that we're looking at. So what's a specialized analytic stream? What's a specialized security stack stream? Right? So until now, like everything was just trying to get to what I would call horizontal parody where you took the things you had before you replicated them in a new world with, like, some different software, but it was still kind of the same. And now we're saying, OK, let's try Thio. Let's try to move out of everything, just being a generic sort of cloud set of services and being more total cloud services. >>That is the evolution of everything technology, the first movement. Everything doing technology is we try and make the old thing the new thing look like the old thing, right? First PCs was a mainframe emulator. We took our virtual servers and we made them look like physical service, then eventually figure out, Oh, there's a whole bunch of other stuff that I could do then I couldn't do before. And that's the part we're trying to hop into now. Right? Is like, Oh, now that I've gone cloud native, what can I do that I couldn't do before? Right? So we're just we're sort of hitting that inflection point. That's when you're really going to see the growth takeoff. But for whatever reason, and i t. All we ever do is we're trying to replicate the old until we figure out the old didn't really work, and we should do something new. >>Well, let me throw something old and controversial. Controversial old but old old trope out there. Consumerism ation of I t. I mean, if you think about what year was first year you heard that term, was it 15 years ago? 20 years ago. When did that first >>podcast? Yeah, so that was a long time ago >>way. So if you think about it like, it kind of is happening. And what does it mean, right? Come. What does What does that actually mean in today's world Doesn't exist. >>Well, you heard you heard. Like Fred Luddy, whose founder of service now saying that was his dream to bring consumer like experiences to the enterprise will. Well, it didn't really happen. I mean, service not pretty. Pretty complicated compared toa what? We know what we do here, but so it's It's evolving. >>Yeah, I think there's also the enterprise ation of consumer technology that John the companies, you know, you look a zoom. They came to market with a highly consumer facing product, realized it didn't have the security tools, you know, to really be corporate great. And then they had to go invest a bunch of money in that. So, you know, I think that waken swing the pendulum all the way over to the consumer side, but that that kind of failed us, right? So now we're trying to bring it back to center a little bit where we blend the two together. >>Cloud kind of brings that I never looked at that way. That's interesting and surprising of consumer. Yeah, that's >>alright, guys. Hey, we gotta wrap Zs, Maribel. Always a pleasure having you guys on great great insights from the half hour flies by. Thanks so much. We appreciate it. >>Thank >>you guys. >>Alright, keep it right there. Mortgage rate content coming from the Cuban Cloud Day Volonte with John Ferrier and a whole lineup still to come Keep right there.
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube presenting Cuban to you by silicon angle. You know, here we are on 2021 you know, just exited one of the strangest years, recognition on the cloud computing providers that you need to give it to the customers the way they want it, It was private cloud And and then now we're, you know, hearing a lot of multi cloud And if you look at the last post that put on Silicon Angle, which was talking about five acquisition of Volterra, Is that distributed that you were talking about and I think that's what you know, kind of cool about this is we're being able to use our data and much different ways. And then you mentioned the ephemeral nature. And that's a that is a profound change, and you mentioned the observe ability. And that would include the programming model as well, And the thing we're talking about now is what is cloud is an operating model look like? and we were comparing the S n a definite the, you know, the proprietary protocol E think that's what you said? And I said, Oh, that means there s n a But if you think about it, that's kind of almost that can hang. think you know, Dave, your your dad doesn't change what you build ups. We have to figure out, you know, we get this a p But I think that many of the larger companies I speak to are looking for You know, obviously, if you look to the cloud providers A W s does a great job of stitching together that you know aviatrix on the network side will tear of the security side of companies like that. Maribel, I think if you look at the world of consumer APS, we moved to a lot more kind of purpose built So are you buying all into a Microsoft all you're buying all into an Amazon and If I don't take that step, gonna be stuck in the path in the past and not be able to move forward. So I think that this this concept of what are the technologies and services that you use And I was how companies make this transition is gonna out of the old bus and they take, you know, the seat and and they eventually start stripping away things. And so stitching the those different worlds together is where a lot got But you know, we all we all say that things were going to go away. I bank jobs from IBM kicks or something, you know, And if those were those workloads probably aren't gonna move anywhere, right, they're not. Remember that bank when you talk about bank guy we interviewed in the off the record after the Cube interviews like, I buy the next IBM mainframe sight unseen. But then, but then, but they're not growing right. But I do think if you look at the well, how it's different from the old four g l days where we didn't actually expand the base of developers. because it became so easy to dio. A So, you know, when you think of twilio, that's like a service. And data by its very nature is distributed so that she's putting forth the whole new paradigm Who's gonna build the visual studio for data, We didn't touch on because an opportunity for that for, you know, data governance and data ownership and data transport. the things you had before you replicated them in a new world with, like, some different software, And that's the part we're trying to hop into now. Consumerism ation of I t. I mean, if you think about what year was first year you heard that So if you think about it like, it kind of is happening. Well, you heard you heard. realized it didn't have the security tools, you know, to really be corporate great. Cloud kind of brings that I never looked at that way. Always a pleasure having you guys Mortgage rate content coming from the Cuban Cloud Day Volonte with John Ferrier and
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Mary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Ferrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fred Luddy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Maribel Lopez | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Angela | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York Bank | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Volterra | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Zeus Kerravala | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ZK research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Mirabelle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Maribel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one wheel | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jim Octagon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lopez Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Zias Caraballo | PERSON | 0.98+ |
around 55 miles an hour | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first movement | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
15 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
first year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first crank | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Andi | PERSON | 0.97+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Zia | PERSON | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.96+ |
dozens | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
200 work flows | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.94+ |
Avery | PERSON | 0.93+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.92+ |
uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
single thing | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
earlier today | DATE | 0.9+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.89+ |
Google Toe | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
one company | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
tons of computer | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
dozens of abstraction layers | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Earlier today | DATE | 0.86+ |
Iraq | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
Os | TITLE | 0.85+ |
edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
Cuban Cloud | OTHER | 0.83+ |
twilio | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
Power Panel with Tim Crawford & Sarbjeet Johal | AWS re:Invent 2020
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 sponsored by Intel, AWS and our community partners. >>Hello and welcome back to the cubes Virtual coverage of AWS reinvent 2020. Um, John for your host with a cube virtual were not there in person, but we're gonna do it our job with the best remote we possibly can. Where? Wall to wall coverage on the AWS reinvent site as well as on demand on the Cube. Three new 3 65 platform. We got some great power panel analysts here to dig in and discuss Partner Day for a W S what it means for the customer. What it means for the enterprise, the buyer, the people trying to figure out who to buy from and possibly new partners. How can they re engineer and reinvent their company to partner better with Amazon, take advantage of the benefits, but ultimately get more sales? We got Tim Crawford, star Beat Joel and Day Volonte, Friends of the Cube. We all know him on Twitter, You guys, the posse, the Cube policy. Thanks for coming on. I'm sure it's good guys entertaining and we're >>hanging out drinking beer. Oh, my God. That'd be awesome. You guys. >>Great to have you on. I wanted to bring you on because it's unique. Cross section of perspectives. And this isn't This is from the end user perspective. And, Tim, you've been talking about the c x o s for years. You expert in this? Sorry. You're taking more from a cloud perspective. You've seen the under the hood. What's happening? Let's all put it together. If your partner Okay, first question to the group. I'm a partner. Do I win with Amazon, or do I lose with Amazon? First question. >>Yeah, I'll jump in. I'll say, you know, regardless you win, you win with Amazon. I think there's a lot of opportunity for partners with Amazon. Um, you have to pick your battles, though. You have to find the right places where you can carve out a space that isn't too congested but also isn't really kind of fettered with a number of incumbents. And so if you're looking at the enterprise space, I think that there is a ton of potential because, let's face it, >>Amazon >>doesn't have all of the services packaged in a way that the enterprise can consume. And I think that leaves a lot of fertile ground for s eyes and I SVS to jump in and be able to connect those dots so I'd say it's win, win >>start be if you're like a so cohesively onstage. Jackson's coming out talking about China, the chips and data. If you're like a vendor and I s V you're a startup or your company trying to reinvent How do you see Amazon as a partner? >>Yeah, I see Amazon as a big market for me. You know, it increased my sort of tam, if you will. Uh, the one big sort off trend is that the lines between technology providers and service providers are blurred. Actually, it's flipping. I believe it will flip at some time. We will put consume technology from service providers, and they are becoming technology providers. Actually, they're not just being pipe and power kind of cloud. They are purely software, very high sort of highly constructed machinery, if you will. Behind the scenes with software. >>That's >>what Amazon is, uh, big machine. If you are, and you can leverage that and then you can help your customers achieve their business called as a partner. I think's the women and the roll off. Actually, Assize is changing, I believe a size. Well, I thought they were getting slow, sidetracked by the service providers. But now they have to actually change their old the way they they used to get these, you know, shrink wrap software, and then install and configure and all that stuff. Now it's in a cloud >>on >>they have to focus a little more on services, and and some of the s eyes are building tools for multi cloud consumption and all that. So things are changing under under this whole big shift to go out. >>I mean, I think if you're in S I and you're lifting and shifting, you make a few bucks and helping people do that deal with the tech. But I think we're the rial. Money is the business transformation, and you find the technology is there, it's it's another tool in the bag. But if you can change your operating model, that's gonna drive telephone numbers to the bottom line. That's a boardroom discussion, and that's where the real dollars are for s eyes. That's like that's why guys like Accent you're leading leading into the cloud Big time >>e think I think you're absolutely right, David. I think that's that's one aspect that we have to kind of call out is you can be one of those partners that is focused on the transaction and you'll be successful doing that. But you're absolutely right. If you focus on the long game. I think that is just like I said, completely fertile ground. And there are a lot of opportunities because historically Amazon was ah was a Lego parts, uh, type of cloud provider, right? They provided you with the basic building blocks, which is great for Web scale and startups not so good for enterprise. And so now Amazon is starting to put together in package part, so it's more consumable by enterprises. But you still need that help. And as Sarpy just mentioned, you also have to consider that Amazon is not the only aspect that you're gonna be using. You're gonna be using other providers to. And so I think this again is where partners they pick a primary, and then they also bring in the others where appropriate. >>All right, I want to get into this whole riff. I have a cherry chin on day one. Hey, came on the special fireside chat with me and we talked about, um, cloud errors before cloud Amazon. And now I'll call postcode because we're seeing this kind of whole new, you know, in the cloud kind of generation. And so he said, OK, this pre cloud you had Amazon generation, whereas lift and shift. Ah, lot of hybrid And you have everything is in the cloud like a snowflake kind of thing. And he kind of call it the reptiles versus the amphibians you're on. See your inland, your hybrid, and then you're you're in the water. I mean, so So he kind of went on, Took that another level, meaning that. Okay, this is always gonna be hybrid. But there's a unique differentiation for being all in the cloud. You're seeing different patterns. Amazon certainly has an advantage. See, Dev Ops guru, that's just mining the data of their entire platform and saying Okay, Yeah, do this. There's advantages for being in the cloud that aren't available. Hybrid. So amphibian on land and sea hybrid. And then in the cloud. How do you guys see that if you're a partner. You wanna be on the new generation. What's the opportunity to capture value? He has hybrid certainly coexist. But in the new era, >>remember Scott McNealy used to talk about car makers and car dealers. And of course, Sun's gone. But he used to say, We want to be a carmaker. Car dealers. They got big houses and big boats, but we're gonna be a carmaker. Oh, I think it's some similarities here. I mean, there's a lot of money to be made as a as a car dealer. But you see, companies like Dell, H P E. You know, they want to be carmakers. Obviously Google Microsoft. But there are gonna be a lot of successful really big carmakers in this game. >>Yeah, I believe I believe I always call it Amazon Is the makers cloud right, So they are very developer friendly. They were very developer friendly for startups. Uh, a stem said earlier, but now they are very developer, friendly and operations friendly. Now, actually, in a way for enterprises, I believe, and that the that well, the jerry tend to sort of Are you all all in cloud are sitting just in the dry land. Right now, I think every sort off organization is in a different sort off mature, at different maturity level. But I think we're going all going towards a technology consumption as a service. Mostly, I think it will be off Prem. It can be on Prem in future because off age and all that. And on that note, I think EJ will be dominated by Tier one cloud providers like crazy people who think edge will be nominally but telcos and all that. I think they're just, uh, if >>I made Thio, if I may interject for a second for the folks watching, that might not be old enough to know who Scott McNealy is. He's the founder of Sun Microsystems, which was bought by Oracle years ago. Yeah, basically, because many computer, there's a lot of young kids out there that even though Scott McNealy's But remember, >>do your homework, Scott, you have to know who Scott Scott McNealy >>also said, because Bill Gates was dominant. Microsoft owns the tires and the gas to, and they want to own the road. So remember Microsoft was dominating at that time. So, Tim Gas data is that I mean, Amazon might have everything there. >>I was gonna go back to the to the comment. You know, McNeely came out with some really, really good analogies over his tenure. Um, it's son and you know, son had some great successes. But unfortunately, Cloud is not as simplistic as buying a car and having the dealership and the ecosystem of gas and tires. And the rest you have to think about the toll journey. And that journey is incredibly complicated, especially for the enterprise that's coming from legacy footprints, monolithic application stacks and trying to understand how to make that transition. It's almost it's almost, in a way mawr analogous to your used to riding a bike, and now you're gonna operate a semi. And so how do you start to put all of the pieces into place to be able to make that transition? And it's not trivial. You have to figure out how your culture changes, how your processes changes. There are a lot of connected parts. It's not a simple as the ecosystem of tires and gas. We have to think about how that data stream fits in with other data streams where analytics are gonna be done. What about tying back to that system of record that is going to stay on the legacy platform. Oh, and by the way, some of that has to still stay on Prem. It can't move to the cloud yet. So we have this really complicated, diverse environment that we have to manage, and it's only getting more complicated. And I think that's where the opportunity comes in for the size and s visas. Step into that. Understand that journey, understand the transitions. I don't believe that enterprises, at least in the near term, let alone short term, will be all in cloud. I think that that's more of a fantasy than reality. There is a hybrid state that that is going to be transitory for some period of time, and that's where the big opportunity is. >>I think you're right on time. I think just to double down on that point, just to bring that to another level is Dave. Remember back in the days when PCs where the boom many computers with most clients there was just getting started? There was a whole hype cycle on hard drives, right? Hard drives were the thing. Now, if you look out today, there's more. Observe, ability, startups and I could count, right? So to Tim's point, this monolithic breakdown and component izing decomposing, monolithic APs or environments with micro services is complex. So, to me, the thing that I see is that that I could relate to is when I was breaking in in the eighties, you had the mainframes. Is being the youngun I'm like, Okay, mainframes, old monolithic client server is a different paradigm thing. You had, uh, PCs and Internet working. I think all that change is happening so fast right now. It's not like over 10 years to Tim's points, like mainframes to iPhones. It's happening in like three years. Imagine crunching all that complexity and change down to a short window. I think Amazon has kind of brought that. I'm just riffing on that, But >>yeah, you're absolutely right, John. But I think there's another piece and we can use a very specific example to show this. But another piece that we have to look at is we're trying to simplify that environment, and so a good place to simplify that is when we look at server lis and specifically around databases, you know, historically, I had to pick the database architecture that the applications would ride on. Then I have to have the infrastructure underneath and manage that appropriately so that I have both the performance a swell, a security as well as architecture. Er and I have to scale that as needed. Today, you can get databases of service and not have to worry about the underpinnings. You just worry about the applications and how those data streams connect to other data streams. And so that's the direction that I think things were going is, and we see this across the enterprise we're looking for. Those packaged package might be a generalized term, but we're looking for um, or packaged scenario and opportunity for enterprises rather than just the most basic building blocks. We have to start putting together the preformed applications and then use those as larger chunks. And >>this is the opportunity for a size I was talking before about business transformation. If you take, take Tim's database example, you don't need somebody anymore. Toe, you know, set up your database to tune it. I mean, that's becoming autonomous. But if you think about the way data pipelines work in the way organizations are structured where everything because it goes into this monolithic data lake or and and And it's like generic content coming in generic data where the business owner has to get in line and beg a data scientist or quality engineered or thio ingest a new data source. And it's just like the old data warehouse days where I think there's tremendous opportunities for s eyes to go in a completely re architect. The data model. Sergeant, This is something you and I were talking about on Twitter. It's That's why I like what snowflakes doing. It's kind of a AWS is trying to do with lasted glue views, but there's a whole business transformation opportunity for s eyes, which I just think is huge. Number l >>e all talk. Go ahead. Sorry. Yeah, >>I think we >>all talk, but we know we all agree on one thing that the future is hybrid for at least for next. You know, 10 years, if not more. Uh, hybrid is hard. The data proximity is, uh, very important. That means Leighton see between different workloads, right? That's super important. And I talk about this all the time and almost in every conversation I have about about. It's just scenario, is that there three types of applications every every enterprise systems or fractured systems, systems of engagement and the systems of innovation and my theory of cloud consumption tells me that sooner or later, systems off record. We'll move into SAS SAS world. That's that's how I see it. There's no other way around, I believe, and the systems off engagement or systems off differentiation something and call it. They will leverage a lot off platforms, the service and in that context context, I have said it many times the to be a best of the breed platform. As a service, you have to be best off the breed, um, infrastructure as a service provider. And that's Amazon. And that is that's also a zero to a certain extent, and then and and Google is trying to do that, too. So the feature sort off gap between number one cloud and two and three is pretty huge. I believe I think Amazon is doing great data democratization through several less. I just love serving less for that Several things over. Unless there is >>a winning formula is no doubt about several times I totally agree. But I think one of the things that I miss it has done is they've taken server lists. They brought their putting all the I as and the chips, and they're moving all the value up to the service layer, which gives them the advantage over others. Because everyone else is trying to compete down here. They're gonna be purpose built. If you look what Apple is doing with the chips and what the Amazon is doing, they're gonna kind of have this chip to chip scenario and then the middle. Where in between is the container ization, the micro services and Lambda? So if you're a developer, you approach is it's programmable at that point that could that could be a lock spec. I think for Amazon, >>it absolutely could be John. But I think there's another aspect here that we have to touch on, especially as we think about partners and where the opportunities come in. And that is that We often talk about non cloud to cloud right, how to get from on Prem to cloud. But the piece that you also have thio bring into the conversation is Theo edge to cloud continuum and So I think if you start to look at some of the announcements this week from AWS, you start looking at some of the new instance types uh, that are very ai focused. You look at the two new form factors for outposts, which allows you to bring cloud to a smaller footprint within an on premise premises, situation, uh, different local zones. And then Thea other piece that I think is really interesting is is their announcements around PCs and eks anywhere being able to take cloud in kubernetes, you know, across the board. And so the challenge here is, as I mentioned earlier, complexity is paramount. It's concern for enterprises just moving to cloud. You start layering in the edge to cloud continuum, and it just it gets exponentially more complicated. And so Amazon is not going to be the one to help you go through that. Not because they can't, but frankly, just the scale of help that is going to be needed amongst enterprises is just not there. And so this is really where I think the opportunity lies for the s eyes and I SVS and partners. You >>heard how Jassy defined hybrid John in the article that you wrote when you did your one on one with him, Tim and the in the analyst call, you answered my question and then I want to bring in Antonio near his comment. But Jassy basically said, Look, we see the cloud bring We're gonna bring a W s to the edge and we see data centers. This is another edge node and San Antonio Neary after HP is pretty good quarter uh came out and said, Well, we heard the public cloud provider talking about hybrid welcome, you know? >>Yeah, they were going and then getting here jumped on that big time. But we'll be looking hybrid. Tim nailed The complexity is the is the evil is friction is a friction area. If the complexity could be mastered by the edge provider closest to the customer, that's gonna be valuable, um, for partners. And then we can do that. Amazon's gonna have to continue to remove the friction and putting that together, which is why I'm nervous about their channel partners. Because if I'm a partner, I asked myself, How do I make money with Amazon? Right? At the end of the day, it's money making right. So how can I be successful? Um, not gonna sell more in the marketplace. Will the customer consumer through there? Is it friction or is a complex So this notion of complexity and friction becomes a double edged sword Tim on both sides. So we have five minutes left. Let's talk about the bottom side Complexity, >>friction. So you're absolutely right, John. And you know, the other thing that that I would say is for the partner, you have to look beyond what Amazon is selling today. Look at where the customers are going. And you know, David, I think you and I were both in an analyst session with Andy Jassy several years ago where one of the analysts asked the question. So you know, what's your perspective on Hybrid Cloud? In his response, candidly was, while we have this particular service and really, what he was talking to is a service that helps you on board to Amazon's public cloud. There was there was not an acknowledgment of hybrid cloud at the time, But look at how things have changed just in a short few years, and I understand where Jassy is coming from, but this is just exemplifies the fact that if you're a partner, you have to look beyond what Amazon is saying and think toe how the customer is evolving, how the enterprise is evolving and get yourself ahead of them. That will position you best for both today. And as you're building for the future. >>That's a great point, Dave. Complexity on buying. I'm a customer. You can throw me a marketplace all you want, but if I'm not gonna be tied into my procurement, how I'm consuming technology. Tim's point. Amazon isn't the only game in town. I got other suppliers. >>Yeah, well, certainly for some technology suppliers, they're basically could bring their on prem estate if it's big enough into the cloud. Uh, you know what is big enough? That's the big question here. You know, our guys like your red hats big enough. Okay, we know that Nutanix pure. They're sort of the next layer down. Can they do? They have enough of a customer base that they could bring into the cloud, create that abstraction layer, and then you got the born in the cloud guy Snowflake, Colombia or two good examples. Eso They've got the technology partners and then they're the size and consultants. And again, I see that is the really big opportunity is 10 points out? Amazon is acknowledging that hybrid Israel in in a newly defined way, they're going out to the edge, find you wanna call data center the edge. How are they going to support those installations? How are they gonna make sure that they're running properly? That they're connected to the business process? Those air That's s I whitespace. Huge. >>Guys, we have to wrap it up right now. But I just end on, you know, we'll get everyone go A little lightning around quick soundbite on the phrase with him, which stands for what's in it from me. So if I'm a partner, I'm a customer. I look at Amazon, I think. What's in it for me? Yeah. What a za customer like what do I get out of this? >>Yeah, having done, like more than 100 data center audits, and I'm seeing what mess up messes out there and having done quite a few migrations to cloud migrations of the messy messages piece, right? And it doesn't matter if you're migrating 10% or 20 or 30 it doesn't matter that how much you're migrating? It's a messy piece, and you cannot do with our partners that work. Actually, you need that. Know how you need to infuse that that education into into your organization, how to consume cloud, how toe make sense of it, how you change your processes and how you train your people. So it touches all the products, people and processes. So on three years, you gotta have partners on your side to make it >>so Hey, I'll go quick. And, Tim, you give you the last word. Complexity is cash. Chaos is cash. Follow the complexity. You'll make cash. >>Yeah, you said it, David. I think anyway, that you can help an enterprise simplify. And if you're the enterprise, if you're the customer, look for those partners. They're gonna help you simplify the journey over time. That's where the opportunity really lies. >>Okay, guys, Expert power panel here on Cuba live program, part of AWS reinvent virtual coverage, bringing you all the analysis from the experts. Digital transformations here. What's in it for me is a partner and customer. Help me make some money, master complexity and serve my customer. Mister Cube. Thanks for watching >>que Yeah, from around the globe. It's the cute
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube with digital coverage of You guys, the posse, the Cube policy. You guys. Great to have you on. You have to find the right places where you can carve out And I think that leaves a lot of fertile ground for s eyes and I SVS to the chips and data. Behind the scenes with software. and then you can help your customers achieve their business called they have to focus a little more on services, and and some of the s eyes are building tools for multi cloud But if you can change your operating model, that's gonna drive telephone numbers to the bottom line. And as Sarpy just mentioned, you also have to consider that Amazon is not What's the opportunity to capture value? I mean, there's a lot of money to be made as a as a car dealer. the jerry tend to sort of Are you all all in cloud are sitting I made Thio, if I may interject for a second for the folks watching, Microsoft owns the tires and the gas And the rest you have to think about the toll journey. Remember back in the days when PCs where the boom many computers with most clients there was just getting And so that's the direction that I think things were going is, And it's just like the old data warehouse e all talk. As a service, you have to be Where in between is the container ization, the micro services and Lambda? But the piece that you also have thio bring into the conversation is Theo edge to cloud continuum heard how Jassy defined hybrid John in the article that you wrote when you did your one on one If the complexity could be mastered by the edge provider closest to the customer, is for the partner, you have to look beyond what Amazon is selling today. You can throw me a marketplace all you want, but if I'm not gonna be tied into my procurement, I see that is the really big opportunity is 10 points out? But I just end on, you know, we'll get everyone go A So on three years, you gotta have partners on your side to Follow the complexity. I think anyway, that you can help an enterprise simplify. part of AWS reinvent virtual coverage, bringing you all the analysis from It's the cute
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tim Crawford | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sun Microsystems | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tim | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
McNeely | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Scott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Sarbjeet Johal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bill Gates | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
H P E. | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
five minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Scott McNealy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lego | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tim Gas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 points | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Scott McNealy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jackson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cuba | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nutanix | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
First question | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Intro | HPE GreenLake Day
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of HP Green Lake Day made possible by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. >>Hello, everyone. This is Day Volonte with the Cuban Welcome to Green Lake Day. Brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise Green Lake is H P E S. As a service initiative, it's designed to bring a cloud like consumption experience to your I T environment, regardless of physical location. Now the reality is that certain workloads just don't make sense to run in the public cloud. We know the reasons physics, legal or compliance edicts cost factors. Whatever the motive, H P E was the first to take action and create an as a service experience that spans not only its own infrastructure portfolio but also public clouds and edge installations as well. In today's program, you'll hear from experts that will help you understand how Green Lake can support your digital transformations. You know, you hear that phrase a lot. Digital transformation. What does it mean? Well to the many C level execs I speak and consult with, it means investing in initiatives that bring competitive advantage and value to their organizations. Now, the digital part of that value equation means using data to perhaps cut costs, generate revenue, increase operating leverage or even save lives. Whatever your priorities, it's unlikely that deploying and managing I t infrastructure the old way with inordinate amounts of physical labor, limited portfolio visibility and never ending capacity planning our strategic imperatives for you. Rather, it's more likely that you want to shift. Resource is away from those tasks and Dr Productive Change in your organization. Today, we'll hear from a number of HP and partner experts. We have hard news and deep dives into HP Green Lake. You'll also have an opportunity to see demos on Green Lake Central to manage your hybrid workloads as well. We have a demo on how Green Lake works and a container environment, So check out the agenda in the calendar below, or go to the agenda page. Dive right in, ask your questions and hopefully you'll learn and be inspired to bring these innovations to your organization. Welcome to Green Lake Day 2020
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube with digital coverage it's designed to bring a cloud like consumption experience to your I T environment,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
H P E | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Green Lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Green Lake Day | EVENT | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Green Lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
HP Green Lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Green Lake Day 2020 | EVENT | 0.91+ |
HP Green Lake Day | EVENT | 0.87+ |
HPE GreenLake Day | EVENT | 0.87+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.86+ |
Lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
Green Lake Central | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
Cuban | OTHER | 0.56+ |
Green | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.47+ |
Dave Brown, Amazon & Mark Lohmeyer, VMware | AWS re:Invent 2020
>>from >>around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 sponsored by Intel, AWS and our community partners. >>Hello and welcome back to the Cube Coverage of eight of us reinvent 2020 Virtual. I'm John for your host of the Cube. Normally we're in person this year. It's a virtual event. It is reinvent and cube virtual here. We got great interview here. Segment with VM ware and A W s. Two great guests. Keep both Cube alumni. Marc Lemire, senior vice president, general manager, The Cloud Services Business Unit VM Ware and Dave Brown, Vice president Elastic Compute Cloud easy to from Amazon Web services Gentlemen, great to see you guys. Thanks for coming on. >>Great. Thank you. Good to be back. >>Thanks. Great to be back. >>So you know, Dave, we love having you on because ec2 obviously is the core building block of a device. Once the power engine, it's the core product. And Mark, we were just talking a few months ago at VM World of momentum you guys have had on the business front. It's even mawr accelerated with co vid on the pandemic. Give us the update The partnership three years ago when Pat and Andy in San Francisco announced the partnership has been nothing but performance. Business performance, technical integration. Ah, lots happened. What's the update here for reinvent? >>Yeah, I guess the first thing I would say is look, you know, the partnership has has never been stronger. You know, as you said, uh, we announced the partnership and delivered the initial service three years ago. And I think since then, both companies have really been focused on innovating rapidly on behalf of our customers bringing together the best of the VM, or portfolio, and the best of, you know, the entire AWS. A set of capabilities. And so we've been incredibly pleased to be able to deliver those that value to our joint customers. And we look forward to continue to work very closely together. You know, across all aspects of our two companies toe continue to deliver more and more value to our joint customers. >>Well, I want to congratulate you guys at VM where, you know, we've been following that story from day one. I let a lot of people skeptical on the partnership. We were pretty bullish on it. We saw the value. It's been just been great Synergy day. I want to get your thoughts because, you know, I've always been riffing about enabling technologies and and the way it works is enabling technologies. Allow your partners to make more money, too. Right? So you guys do that with the C two, and I know that for a fact because we're doing well with our virtual event cloud, but are easy to bills are up, but who cares? We're doing well. This is the trend you guys are enabling partners, and VM Ware in particular, has a lot of customers that are on AWS. What's your perspective on all this? >>You know the part. The part maker system is so important for us, right? And we get from our customers. We have many customers who, you know, use VM ware in their own environment. They've been using it for years and years, um, true for many other software applications as well and other technologies. Andi, when they moved to AWS there very often. When you use those tools on those services on AWS is well and so you know, we we partner with many, many, many, many companies, and so it's a high priority for us. The VM Ware partnership, I think, is being sort of role model for us in terms of, you know, sitting out outside Sana goal back in 2016. I think it waas and, you know, delivering on that. Then continue to innovate on features over the last three years listening to our customers, bringing larger customers on board, giving them more advanced networking features, improving. You know that the instance types of being whereas utilizing to deliver value to their customers and most recently, obviously, with Outpost AWS outposts and parking with VM ware on VM are enabled outposts and bringing that to our customers and their own data centers. So we see the whole partner ecosystem is critically important. Way were spent a lot of time with VM and other partners on something that our customers really value. >>Mark, I want to get your thoughts on this because I was just riffing with Day Volonte about this. Um, heightened awareness with that covert 19 in the pandemic has kind of created, which is an accelerant of the value. And one >>of the >>things that's a parent is when you have this software driven and software defined kind of environment, whether it's in space or on premise or in the cloud. Um, it's the software that's driving everything, but you have to kind of components. You have the how do you operate something, And then how does the software works? So you know, it's the hand in the glove operators and software in the cloud really is becoming kind of the key things. You guys have been very successful as a company with I t operations, and now you're moving into the cloud. Can you share your thoughts on how VM Ware cloud on AWS takes that next level for your customers? So I think that's a key point that needs to be called that. What's your What's your thoughts on that? >>Yeah, I think you hit the nail on the head, and I think, you know, look, every company is on a journey to transform the level of capability they're able to offer to their customers and their employees, right? And a big part of that is how do they modernize their application environment? How do they how do they deliver new applications and services? And so this has been underway for for a while now. But if if anything, I think Cove, it has only accelerated. Um, the need for customers to be able to continue to go down that path. And so, you know, between VM ware in AWS, um, you know, we're looking to provide those customers a platform that allows them to accelerate their path to application, modernization and new services and capabilities. And, um, you know, Dave talked about the ecosystem and the importance of the ecosystem that AWS and I think you know, together. What we've been able to do if you sort of think about it, is, you know, bringing together this rich set of VM Ware services and capabilities. Um, that we've talked about before, as well as new VM Ware capabilities, for example, the ability to enable kubernetes based applications and services on top of this Corby, um or platform with Tan Xue. Right. So customers can get access to all of that is they go down this modernization path. But, you know, right next door in the same ese is 375 native AWS services that they can use together in conjunction, uh, with that environment. And so if you think about accelerating that journey right Being ableto rapidly migrate those VM ware based workloads into the AWS cloud. When you're in the AWS cloud, be able to modernize that environment using the VM Ware Tansu capability, the native AWS services and then the infrastructure that needs to come together to make that possible, for example, the network connectivity that needs to be enabled, um, to take advantage of some of those services together. Um, you know, we're really we're trying to accelerate our delivery of those capabilities so that we can help our customers accelerate the delivery of that application value thio to their customers. >>David want to get your thoughts on the trends If you speak to the customers out there at VM Ware, customers that are on the cloud because you know the sphere, for instance, very popular on the Ws Cloud with VM Ware Cloud as well as these new modern application trends like Tan Xue, Project Monterey is coming around the corner that was announced that VM world what trends do you see from the two perspective that you could share to the VM ware eight of his customers? What's the key wave right now that they should be riding on. >>Yeah, I think a few things, you know, we definitely are seeing an acceleration in customers Looking Thio looking to utilize humor on AWS You know, there was a lot of interest early on, really, over the last year, I think we've seen 140% growth in the service, which has been incredibly exciting for both of us and really shows that we we're providing customers with the service that works. You know, I think one of the key things that Mark called out just talking previously was just how simple it is for customers to move. You know, often moving to the cloud gets muddled with modernization, and it takes a long time because customers to kind of think about how do they actually make this move? Or are they stuck within their own facility on data center or they need to modernize? We moved to a different hyper visor with PM on AWS. You literally get that same environment on AWS, and so whether it's a a migration because you want to move out of your on premise facility, whether it's a migration because you want to grow and expand your facility without needing to. You know, build more data centers yourself Whether you're looking to build a d. R site on AWS on whether you looking just, you know, maybe build a new applications tank that you wanna build in a modern way, you know, using PMR in Tanzania and all the AWS services, all of those a positive we're seeing from customers. Um, you know, I think I think as the customers grow, the demand for features on being were in AWS grows as well. And we put out a number of important features to support customers that really, really large scale. And that's something that's being exciting. It's just some of the scale that we're seeing from very, very large being, we customers moving over to AWS. And so I think you know a key messages. If you have a Vienna installation today and you're thinking about moving to the cloud, it's really a little that needs to stop you in starting to move. It is is very simple to set up, and very little you have to do to your application stack to actually move it over. >>Mark, that's a great point. I want to get your thoughts on that in reaction toe. What? Dave just said Because this is kind of what you guys had said many years ago and also a VM world when we were chatting, disrupting operations just to stand up the clubs shouldn't be in place. It should be easy on you. Heard what Dave said. It's like you got >>a >>lot of cultures that are operating large infrastructure and they want to move to the cloud. But they got a mandate toe make everything. Is a services more cloud native coming. So, yeah, you gotta check off the VM where boxes and keep things running. But you gotta add more modern tooling mawr application pressure there. So there's a lot of pressure from the business units and the business models to say We gotta take advantage of the modern applications. How do you How do you look at that? >>Yeah, yeah, I mean, I think Look, making this a simple is possible is obviously a really important aspect of what we're trying Thio enable for our customers. Also, I think the speed is important, right? How you know, how can we enable them? Thio accelerate their ability to move to the cloud, but then also accelerate their ability Thio, um, deliver new services and capabilities that will differentiate their business. And then how do we, uh, kind of take some of the heavy lifting off the customers plate in terms of what it actually takes to operate and run the infrastructure and do so in a highly available way that they could depend upon for their business? And of course, delivering that full capabilities of service is a big part of that. You know, one of my when my favorite customer examples eyes a company called Stage Coach, uh, European based transportation company. And they run a network of Busses and trains, etcetera, and they actually decided to use VM. Tosto run one of their most mission critical applications, which is involved with basically scheduling, scheduling those systems right in the people that they know, the bus drivers in the train conductors etcetera. And so if you think about that application right, its's a mission critical application for them. It's also one that they need to be able to iterate involved and improve very quickly, and they were able to take advantage of a number of fairly unique capabilities of the joint service we built together to make that possible. Um, you know, the first thing that they did is they took advantage of something called stretch clusters. The M we're cloud on AWS stretch clusters Where, uh, we basically take that VM Ware environment and we stretch it. We stretch the network across to aws availability zones in the same region, Onda. Then they could basically run their applications on top of that that environment. And this is a really powerful capability because it ensures the highest levels of s L. A. For that application for four nines. In this case, if anything happens, Thio fail in one of those, uh, Aziz, we can automatically fail over and restart the application in the second ese on DSO provides this high level of availability, but they're also able to take advantage of that without on day one. Talk about keeping it simple without on day one, requiring any changes to the application of myself because that application knew how to work in the sphere. And so you know that I work in the sphere in the cloud and it can fail over on the sphere in the cloud on dso they were able to get there quickly. They're able Thio enable that application and now they're taking the next step. Which is how do I enhance and make that application even better, you know, leveraging some of the VM or capabilities also looking to take advantage of some of the native AWS capabilities. So I think that sort of speed, um you know that simplicity that helps helps customers down that path to delivering more value to their employees and their customers. That and we're really excited that were ableto offer that your customers >>just love the philosophy that both companies work back from the customer customer driven kind of mentality certainly key here to this partnership, and you can see the performance. But I think one of the differentiations that I love is that join integration thing engineering that you guys were doing together. I think that's a super valuable, differentiated VM where Dave, this is a key part of the relationship. You know, when I talked to Pat Gelsinger and and again back three years ago and he had Raghu from VM, Ware was like, This is different engineering together. What's your perspective from the West side when someone says, Yeah. Is that Riel? You know, it is easy to really kind of tied in there and his Amazon really doing joint engineering. What do you say to that? >>Oh, absolutely. Yeah, it's very real. I mean, it's been an incredible, incredible journey together, Right? Right, Right from the start, we were trying to work out how to do this back in 2016. You know, we were using some very new technology back then that we hadn't honestly released yet. Uh, the nitrous system, right? We started working with family and the nitrous system back in late 2016, and we only launched our first nitrous system enabled instance that reinvent 2017. And so we were, you know, for a year having being a run on the nitrous system, internally making sure that, you know, we would support their application and that VM Ware ran well on BC around. Well, on aws on, that's been ongoing. And, you know, the other thing I really enjoy about the relationship is learning how to best support each other's customers on on AWS and being where, and Mark is talking about stretch clusters and are being whereas, you know, utilizing the availability zones. We've done other things in terms of optimizing placement with across, you know, physical reaction in data centers. You know, Mark and the team have put forward requirements around, you know, different instance types and how they should perform invest in the Beamer environment. We've taken that back into our instance type definition and what we've released there. So it happens in a very, very low level. And I think it's both teams working together frequently, lots of meetings and then, you know, pushing each other. You know, honestly. And I think for the best experience or at the end of the day, for our joint customers. So it's been a great relationship. >>It helps when both companies are very fluent technically and pushing the envelope with technology. Both cultures, I know personally, are very strong technically, but they also customer centric. Uhm, Mark, I gotta put you on the spot on this question because this comes up every year this year more than ever. Um, is the question around VM ware on A W S and VM ware in general, and it's more of a general industry theme. But I wanna ask you because I think it relates to the US Um vm ware cloud on aws. Um, the number one question we get is how can I automate my I t operations? Because it's kind of a no brainer. Now it's kind of the genes out of the bottle. That's a mandate. But it's not always easy. Easy as it sounds to dio, you still got a lot to dio. Automation gets you level set to take advantage of some of these higher level services, and all customers want to get there fast. Ai i o t a lot of goodness in the cloud that you kinda gotta get there through kinda automating the based up first. So how did how are your customers? How are you guys helping customers automate their infrastructure operations? >>Yeah, I mean, Askew articulated right? This is a huge demand. The requirement from our customer base, right? Uh, long gone are the days that you wanna manually go into a u I and click around here, click there to make things happen, right? And so, um, you know, obviously, in addition to the core benefit of hey, we're delivering this whole thing is a service, and you don't have to worry about the hardware, the software, the life cycle all of that, Um you know, at a higher level of the stack, we're doing a lot of work to basically expose a very rich set of AP eyes. We actually have enabled that through something called the VM, or Cloud Developer center, where you can go and customer could go and understand all of the a p i s that we make available to that they can use to build on top of to effectively automated orchestrate their entire VM or cloud on AWS based infrastructure. And so that's an area we've we've invested a lot in. And at the end of the day, you know we want Thio. Both enable our customers to take their existing automation tooling that they might have been using on their VM ware based environment in their own data center. Obviously, all of that should continue to work is they bring that into the emcee aws. Um but now, once we're in AWS and we're delivering, this is a service in AWS. There's actually a higher level of automation, um that we can enable, and so you know everything that you can do through the VM or cloud console. Um, you can do through a P. I s So we've exposed roughly a piece that allow you to add or remove instance capacity ap eyes that allow you to configure the network FBI's that allow you toe effectively. Um, automate all aspects of sort of how you want Thio configure and pull together that infrastructure. Onda. You know, as Dave said, a lot of this, you know, came from some of those early just customer discussions where that was a very, very clear expectations. So, you know, we've we've been working hard. Thio make that possible. >>So can customers integrate native Cloud native technologies from AWS into APS running on VM ware cloud on any of us? >>Yeah. I mean, I'll give you one example for so we you know, we've been able to support for cloud formation right on top of the M C. Mehta best. And so that's, you know, one way that you can leverage these 80 best tools on top of on top of the m. C at best. Um and you know, as we talked about before, uh, you know everything on the VM ware in the VM ware service. We're exposing through those AP eyes. And then, of course, everything it best does has been built that way from the start. And so customers can work. Um, you know, seamlessly across those two environments. >>Great stuff. Great update. Final question for both of you. Uh, Dave will start with you. What's the unique advantages? When you people watching? That's gonna say, OK, I get it. I see the momentum. I've now got a thing about post pandemic growth strategies. I gotta fund the projects, so I'm either gonna retool while I'm waiting for the world to open up. Two. I got a tail wind. This is good for my business. I'm gonna take advantage of this. How do they modernize our application? What? The unique things with VM Ware Cloud on AWS. What's unique? What would you say? I >>mean, I think the big thing for me eyes the consistency, um, the other way that were built This between the the sphere on prime environment and the the sphere that you get on aws with BMC on aws. Um you know, when I think about modernization and honestly, any project that I do, we do it Amazon I don't like projects that required enormous amount of planning and then tooling. And then, you know, you've this massive waterfall stock project before you do anything meaningful. And what's so great about what we built here is you can start that migration almost immediately, start bringing a few applications over. And when you do that, you can start saying, Okay, where do we want to make improvements? But just by moving over to aws NBN were on AWS, you start to reap the benefits of being in the child right from day one. Many of the things Mark called out about infrastructure management and that sort of thing. But then you get to modernize off to that as well. And so just the richness in terms of, you know, being where a tan xue and then the you know, I think it's more than 200 AWS services. Now you get to bring all that into your application stack, but at a time at a at a at a cadence or time that really matters to you. But you could get going immediately, and I think that's the thing that customers ready need to do if you find yourself in a situation you know, with just how much the world's changed in the last year. Looking Thio. Modernize your applications deck, Looking for the cost benefits. Looking to maybe get out of the data center. Um, it's a relatively easy both forward and just put in a couple of engineers a couple of technicians on to actually starting to do the process. I think you'll be very surprised at how much progress you can actually make in a short amount of time. >>Mark, you're in charge of the Cloud Services business unit at VM Ware CPM. Where cloud on AWS successful more to do a lot of action kubernetes cloud native automation and the list goes on and on. What are the most unique advantages that you guys have? What would you say? >>Yeah, I mean, I would maybe just build on Dave's comments a bit. I think you know, if you look at it through the customer lens three ability to reiterate and the ability to move quickly and not being forced into sort of a one size fits all model, right? And so there may be certain applications that they run into VM, and they want to run into VM forever. Great. We could enable that there might be other applications that they want to move from a VM into a container, remove into kubernetes and do that in a very seamless way. And we can enable that with, uh, with Tan Xue, right? By the way, they may wanna actually many applications. They're gonna require, uh, complex composite applications that have some aspects of it running in communities, other aspects running on VMS. You know, other aspects connecting to some native AWS services. And so, you know, we could enable those types of, you know, incremental value that's delivered very, very quickly that allows them at the end of the day to move, move fast on behalf of their own customers and deliver more about it to them. So I think this this sort of philosophy, right that Dave talked about I think is is one of the really important things we've tried to focus on, um, together. But, you know, on behalf of our joint customers and you know that that sort of capabilities just gets richer and richer. Overtime right. Both of us are continuing to innovate, and both of us will continue to think about how we bring those services together as we innovate in our respective areas and how they need to link together as part of this This intense solution. Um, so, uh, you know that I think that you're gonna see us continue to invest, continue to move quickly. Um, continue to respond to what our customers together are asking us. Thio enable for them. >>Well, really appreciate the insight. Thanks for coming on this cube virtual, um, segment. Um, virtualization has hit the cube where we have multiple virtual stages out there at reinvent on the site. Obviously, it's a virtual event over three weeks, so it's a little bit not four days or three days. It's three weeks. So, um, if you're watching this, check out the site. Tons of good V o D. The executive leaderships Check out the keynotes that air there. It's awesome. Big news. Of course. Check out the cube coverage, but I have one final final question is you guys are leaders in the industry and within your companies, and we're virtual this year. You gotta manage your teams. You still gotta go to work every day. You gotta operate your business is a swell as work with customers. What have you guys learned? And can you share any, um, advice or observations of how to be effective as a leader, a za manager, and as a customer interface point for your companies? >>Well, I I think, uh, let me go first, then Mark Mark and had some things, you know, I think we're moving to certainly in the last year, specifically with covert. You know, we've we've we've just passed out. I think we just passed out seven months off, being remote now on, obviously doing reinvent as well. Um, it zits certainly taken some adjusting. I think we've done relatively well, um, with, you know, going virtual. We were well prepared at Amazon to go virtual, but from a leadership point of view, you know, making sure that you have been some positives, right? So for one, I have I have teams all over the world, and, uh, being virtually actually helped a lot with that. You know, everybody is virtually all on the same stage. It's not like we have a group of us in Seattle and a few others scattered around the world. Everybody's on the same cold now. on that has the same you know, be able to listen to in the same way. But I better think a lot about sort of just my own time. Personally, in the time that my team spends, I think it's been very easy for us. Thio run a little too hot waken start a little too early and run a little too late in the evenings on DSO, making sure that we protect that time. And then, obviously, from a customer point of view, you know, we found that customers are very willing to engage virtually as well around the world s Oh, that's something we've been able to utilize very well to continue to have. You know what we call our executive briefing center and do those sorts of things customer meetings on in some ways. You know, without the plane trip on either side to the other side of the world, you're able to do more of those and stay even more in contact with your customers. So it's been it's been a lot of adjustment for us. I think we've done well. I think you know, a zay said. We've had a look at Are we keeping it balanced because I think it's very easy to get out of balance and just from a time point of view. But I think I'm sure it'll show. It'll change again as the world goes back to normal. But in many ways, I think we've learned a lot of valuable lessons that I hope in some cases don't go away. I think well will probably be more virtual going forward. So that's what a bit of from my side >>creating. Yeah. Confronting hot people run hard. You can, you know, miss misfire on that and burnout gonna stay, Stay tuned. Mark your thoughts. Is leader customers defeating employees? Customers? >>Yeah. I mean, in many ways, I would say similar experience. I think, uh, I mean, if you sort of think back, right, uh, it's in many ways amazing that within the course of literally a week, right, I think about some of the BMR experience we went from, uh, you know, 90 95% of our employees, at least in the US, working in an office right to immediately all working from home. And, uh, you know, I think having the technology is available to make that possible and really? For the most part, without skipping a beat. Um, it is pretty pretty amazing, right? Um and then, you know, I think from a productivity perspective, in many ways, you know, it z increased productivity. Right? Um, they have mentioned the ability engage customers much more easily you think about in the past, you would have taken a flight to Europe to maybe meet with, you know, 5 to 10 customers and spent an entire week. And now you can do that in, you know, in the morning, right? Um, and the way we sort of engaged our teams, I think in many ways, um, sort of online, uh, can create a very, very rich experience, right? In a way to bring people together across many locations in a much more seamless way than if maybe part of the team is there in the office. And some other part of the team is trying toe connect in through resume or something else. A little bit of a fragmented experience. But if everyone's on the same platform, regardless of where you are e think we've seen some benefits from that. >>It's interesting. You see virtualization. What that did to the servers created cloud, you know. Hey, Productivity. >>You also have to be careful. You don't run those servers too hot. You >>gotta have a cooling. You got the cooling Eso I You know, this is really an interesting, you know, social, uh, equation Global phenomenon of productivity Cloud. Combined with this notion of virtual changes, the workloads, the work flows, the workplace and the workforce, right, The future work. So I think, you know, we're watching this closely. I know you guys have both had great success from the pandemic with this new pressure on the cloud, because it's a new model, a new way to do things, So we'll keep watching it. Thanks for the insight. Thanks for coming on and and enjoy the rest of reinvent. >>Great. Thank >>you. Great to be here. >>Okay, this the cubes coverage. I'm John for your host of Cuban, remember? Go to the reinvent site. Three weeks of great virtual content over this month, Of course. Cube coverage for three weeks. Stay tuned off. All the analysis and a lot of great thought leadership in the industry commentary. Stay with us throughout the month. Thank you. Yeah,
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube with digital coverage of AWS great to see you guys. Good to be back. Great to be back. So you know, Dave, we love having you on because ec2 obviously is the core building block of a device. and the best of, you know, the entire AWS. This is the trend you guys are enabling so you know, we we partner with many, many, many, many companies, and so it's a high priority for us. Mark, I want to get your thoughts on this because I was just riffing with Day Volonte about this. You have the how do you operate something, and I think you know, together. customers that are on the cloud because you know the sphere, for instance, very popular on the Ws Yeah, I think a few things, you know, we definitely are seeing an acceleration in customers Dave just said Because this is kind of what you guys had said many years ago and also a VM world when we were chatting, How do you How do you look Which is how do I enhance and make that application even better, you know, certainly key here to this partnership, and you can see the performance. And so we were, you know, for a year having being a run on the nitrous system, a lot of goodness in the cloud that you kinda gotta get there through kinda automating hardware, the software, the life cycle all of that, Um you know, at a higher level of the stack, And so that's, you know, one way that you can leverage these 80 best tools on top of on top What would you say? And so just the richness in terms of, you know, being where a tan xue and then that you guys have? I think you know, And can you share any, um, advice or observations on that has the same you know, be able You can, you know, miss misfire on that and But if everyone's on the same platform, regardless of where you are e cloud, you know. You also have to be careful. So I think, you know, we're watching this closely. Great. Great to be here. All the analysis and a lot of great thought leadership in the industry commentary.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Marc Lemire | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris O'Brien | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Hilary | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ildiko Vancsa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan Cohen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Troyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rajiv | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Stefan Renner | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ildiko | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mark Lohmeyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
JJ Davis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Beth | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon Bakke | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Farrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boeing | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cassandra Garber | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter McKay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Brown | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Beth Cohen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Walls | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Seth Dobrin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Seattle | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
5 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hal Varian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
JJ | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jen Saavedra | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Loomis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rajiv Ramaswami | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stefan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank Slootman Dave Vellante Cube Conversation
>>from the Cube Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around >>the world. This is a cute conversation high, but this is Day Volonte. And as you know, we've been tracking the next generation of clouds. Sometimes we call it Cloud to two point. Frank's Lukman is here to really unpack this with me. Frank. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on. >>Yeah, you as well. They could see it >>s o obviously hot off your AIPO A lot of buzz around that. Uh, that's fine. We could we could talk about that, but I really want to talk about the future. What? Before we get off the I p o. That was something you told me when you're CEO service. Now you said, hey, we're priced to perfection, so it looks like snowflakes gonna be priced to perfection. It's a marathon, though. You You made that clear. I presume it's not any different here for you. Yeah, >>well, I think you know the service now. Journey was different in the sense that we were kind of under the underdogs, and people sort of discovered over the years the full potential of the company and I think there's stuff like they pretty much discovered a day. One. It's a little bit more, More sometimes it's nice to be an underdog. Were a bit of an over dog in this, uh, this particular scenario, but, you know, it is what it is, Andre. You know, it's all about execution delivering the results, delivering on our vision, Uh, you know, being great with our customers. And, uh, hopefully the chips will fall where they where they may. At that point, >>yeah, you're you're You're a poorly kept secret at this point, Frank. After a while, I wanted, you know, I've got some excerpts of your book that that I've been reading. And, of course, I've been following your career since the two thousands. You're off sailing. You mentioned in your book that you were kind of retired. You were done, and then you get sucked back in now. Why? I mean, are you in this for the sport? What's the story here? >>Uh, actually, that that's not a bad way of characterizing it. I think I am in that, uh, you know, for the sport, uh, you know the only way to become the best version of yourself is to be to be under the gun and, uh, you know, every single day. And that's that's certainly what we are. It sort of has its own rewards building great products, building great companies, regardless off you know what the spoils. Maybe it has its own rewards. And I It's hard for people like us to get off the field and, you know, hang it up. So here we are. >>You know, you're putting forth this vision now the data cloud, which obviously it's good marketing, but I'm really happy because I don't like the term Enterprise Data Warehouse. I don't think it reflects what you're trying to accomplish. E D. W. It's slow on Lee. A few people really know how to use it. The time value of data is gone by the time you know, your business is moving faster than the data in the D. W. And it really became a savior because of Sarbanes Oxley. That's really what it came a reporting mechanism. So I've never seen What you guys are doing is is e d w. So I want you to talk about the data cloud. I want to get into the to the vision a little bit and maybe challenge you on a couple things so our audience can better understand it. Yes. So >>the notion of a data cloud is is actually, uh, you know, type of cloud that we haven't had. I mean, data has been been fragmented and locked up in a million different places in different clouds. Different cloud regions, obviously on premise, um, And for data science teams, you know, they're trying thio drive analysis across datasets, which is incredibly hard, Which is why you know, a lot of this resorts to, you know, programming on bond things of that sort of. ITT's hardly scalable because the data is not optimized. The economics are not optimized. There's no governance model and so on. But a data cloud is actually the ability thio loosely couple and lightly Federated uh, data, regardless of where it is. So it doesn't have scale limitations or performance limitations. Uh, the way traditional data warehouses have had it. So we really have a fighting chance off really killing the silos and unlocking the bunkers and allowing the full promise of data sciences and ml On day I thio really happen. I mean, a lot of lot of the analysis that happens on data is on the single data set because it's just too damn hard, you know, to drive analysis across multiple data sets. And, you know, when we talk to our customers, they have very precise designs on what they're trying to do. They say, Look, we are trying to discover, you know, through through through deep learning You know what the patterns are that lead to transactions. You know, whether it's if you're streaming company. Maybe it's that you're signing up for a channel or you're buying a movie or whatever it is. What is the pattern you know, of data points that leads us to that desired outcome. Once you have a very accurate description of the data relationships, you know that results in that outcome, you can then search for it and scale it, you know, tens of million times over. That's what digital enterprises do, right? So in order to discover these patterns enriched the data to the point where the patterns become incredibly predictive. Uh, that's that's what snowflake is formed, right? But it requires a completely Federated Data mo because you're not gonna find a data pattern in the in the single data set per se right? So that's that's what it's all about. I mean, the outcomes of a data cloud are very, very closely related to the business outcomes that the user is seeking, right? It's not some infrastructure process. It has a very remote relationship with business outcome. This is very, very closely related. >>So it doesn't take a brain surgeon to look at the Trillion Years Club. And so I could see that I could see the big you know, trillion dollars apple $2 trillion market cap companies. They got data at the core, whereas most companies most incumbents. Yeah, it might be a bottling plant that the core, some manufacturing or some other processes they put, they put data around it in these silos. It seems like you're trying toe really? Bring that innovation and put data at the core. And you've got an architecture to do that. You talk about your multi cluster shared storage architecture. You mentioned you mentioned data sharing it. Will this, in your opinion, enable, for instance, incumbents to do what a lot of the startups were able to do with the cloud days? I mean they got access to data centers, which they they couldn't have before the cloud you're trying to do with something similar with data. >>Yeah, so So, you know, obviously there's no doubt that the cloud is a critical enabler. This wouldn't be happening. Uh, you know what? I was at the same time, the trails that have been blessed by the likes of Facebook and Google. Uh, e the reason those enterprises are so extraordinary valuable is is because of what they know. Uh, you know, through data and how they can monetize what they know through data. But that is now because that power is now becoming available, you know, to every single enterprise out there. Right, Because the data platform, the underlying cloud capabilities, we are now delivering that to anybody who wants it. Now, you still need to have strong date engineering data science capabilities. It's not like falling off a log, but fundamentally, those capabilities are now, you know, broadly accessible in the marketplace. >>So we're talking upfront about some of the differences between what you've done earlier in your career. Like I said, you're the worst kept secret, you know, Data domain. I would say it was sort of somewhat of a niche market. You you blew it up until it was very disruptive, but it was somewhat limited in what could be done. Uh, and and maybe some of that limitation, you know, wouldn't have occurred if you stay the price, uh, independent company service. Now you mop the table up because you really had no competition there, Not the case here. You you've got some of the biggest competitors in the world, so talk about that. And what gives you confidence that you can continue to dominate, >>But, you know, it's actually interesting that you bring up these companies. I mean, data. The man was a scenario where we were constrained on market and literally we were a data backup company. As you recall, we needed to move into backup software. Need to move the primary storage. While we knew it, we couldn't execute on it because it took tremendous resource is which, back in the day, it was much harder than one of this right now. So we ended up selling the company to E M. C and and now part of Dell. But way short, uh, we're left with some trauma from that experience, Uh, that, you know, why couldn't we, you know, execute on that transformation? So coming to service now, we were extremely. I'm certainly need personally, extremely attuned to the challenges that we have endured in our prior company. One of the reasons why you saw service now break out at scale at tremendous growth rights is because of what we have learned from the prior journey. We're not gonna ever get caught again in a situation where we could not sustain our markets and sustain our growth. So if service I was very much the execution model was very much a reaction to what we had encountered in the prior company. Now coming into snowflake totally different deal. Because not only is there's a large market, this is a developing market. I think you've pointed out in some of your broadcasting that this market is very much in flux on the reason is that you know, technology is now capable of doing things for for people and enterprises that they could never do before. So people are spending way mawr resource is than they ever thought possible on these new capability. So you can't think in terms of static markets and static data definitions, it means nothing. Okay, These things are so in transition right now, it's very difficult for people you know to to scope that the scale of this opportunity. >>Yeah. I wanna understand you're thinking around and, you know, I've written about the TAM, and can Snowflake grow into its valuation and the way I drew it, I said, Okay, you got data Lakes and you got Enterprise Data Warehouse. That's pretty well understood. But I called it data as a service to cover the closest analogy to your data cloud. And then even beyond that, when you start bringing in the edge and real time data, uh, talk about how you're thinking about that, Tam. And what what you have to do to participate. You have toe, you know, bring adjacent capabilities, ISAT this read data sharing that will get you there. In other words, you're not like a transaction system. You hear people talking about converge databases, you hear? Talk about real time inference at the edge that today anyway, isn't what snowflake is about. Does that vision of data sharing and the data cloud does that allow you to participate in that massive, multi $100 billion tam that that I laid out and probably others as well. >>Yeah, well, it is always difficult. Thio defined markets based on historical concept that probably not gonna apply whole lot for much longer. I mean, the way we think of it is that data is the beating heart of the digital enterprise on, uh, you know, digital enterprises today. What do you look at? People against the car door dash or so on. Um, they were built from the ground up to be digital on the prices and data Is the beating heart off their operation Data operations is their manufacturing, if you will, um, every other enterprise out there is is working very hard to become digital or part digital and is going to learn to develop data platforms like what we're talking about here to data Cloud Azaz. Well, as the expertise in terms of data engineering and data scientist to really fully become a digital enterprise, right. So, you know, we view data as driving operations off the digital enterprise. That's really what it iss right data, and it's completely data driven. And there's no people involved. People are developing and supporting the process. But in the execution, it is end to end. Data driven. Being that data is the is the signal that initiates the process is technol assess. Their there being a detective, and then they fully execute the entire machinery probe Problematic machinery, if you will, um, you know, of the processes that have been designed, for example, you know, I may fit a certain pattern. You know, that that leads to some transactional context. But I've not fully completed that pattern until I click on some Lincoln. And all of a sudden proof I have become, you know, a prime prospect system, the text that in the real time and then unleashes Oh, it's outreach and capabilities to get me to transact me. You and I are experiencing this every day. You know, when we're when we're online, you just may not fully re election. That's what's happening behind the scenes. That's really what this is all about. So and so to me, this is sort of the new online transaction processing is enter and, uh, you know, data digital. Uh, no process that is continually acquiring, analyzing and acting on data. >>Well, you've talked about the time time value of of data. It loses value over time. And to the extent that you can actually affect decisions, maybe before you lose the customer before you lose the patient even even more importantly or before you lose the battle. Uh, there's all kinds of, you know, mental models that you can apply this. So automation is a key part of that. And then again, I think a lot of people like you said, if you just try to look at historical markets, you can't really squint through those and apply them. You really have toe open up your mind and think about the new possibilities. And so I could see your your component of automation. I I see what's happening in the r P. A space and and I could see See these this massive opportunities Thio really change society, change business, your last thoughts. >>There's just there's just no scenario that I can envision where data is not completely core in central to a digital enterprise, period. >>Yeah, I think I really do think, Frank, your your your Your vision is misunderstood somewhat. I think people say Okay. Hey, we'll bet on salute men Scarpelli the team. That's great to do that. But I think this is gonna unfold in a way that people may be having predicted that maybe you guys, yourselves and your founders, you know, haven't have aren't able to predict as well. But you've got that good, strong architectural philosophy that you're pursuing and it just kind of feels right, doesn't it? >>You know, I mean, one of the 100 conversations and, uh, you know, things is the one of the reasons why we also wrote our book. You know, the rights of the data cloud is to convey to the marketplace that this is not an incremental evolution, that this is not sort of building on the past. There is a real step function here on the way to think about it is that typically enterprises and institutions will look at a platform like snowflakes from a workload context. In other words, I have this business. I have this workload. This is very much historically defined, by the way. And then they benchmark us, you know, against what they're what they're already doing on some legacy platform. And they decided, like, Yeah, this is a good fit. We're gonna put Snowflake here. Maybe there, but it's still very workload centric, which means that we are essentially perpetuating the mentality off the past. Right? We were doing it. Wanna work, load of the time We're creating the new silos and the new bunkers of data in the process. And we're really not approaching this with level of vision that the data science is really required to drive maximum benefit from data. So our arguments and this is this is not an easy arguments is to say, toc IOS on any other sea level person that wants to listen to that look, you know, just thinking about, you know, operational context and operational. Excellent. It's like we have toe have a platform that allows us unfettered access to the data that, you know, we may need to, you know, bring the analytical power to right. If you have to bring in political power to a diversity of data sets, how are we going to do that right? The data lives in, like, 500 different places. It's just not possible, right, other than with insane amounts of programming and complexity, and then we don't have the performance, and we don't have to economics, and we don't have the governance and so on. So you really want to set yourself up with a data cloud so that you can unleash your data science, uh, capabilities, your machine learning your deep learning capabilities, aan den, you really get the full throttle advantage. You know of what the technology can do if you're going to perpetuate the silo and bunkering of data by doing it won't work. Load of the time. You know, 5, 10 years from now, we're having the same conversation we've been having over the last 40 years, you know? >>Yeah. Operationalize ing your data is gonna require busting down those those silos, and it's gonna require something like the data cloud to really power that to the next decade and beyond. Frank's movement Thanks so much for coming in. The Cuban helping us do a preview here of what's to come. >>You bet, Dave. Thanks. >>All right. Thank you for watching. Everybody says Dave Volonte for the Cube will see you next time
SUMMARY :
And as you know, we've been tracking the next generation of clouds. Yeah, you as well. Before we get off the I p o. That was something you told me when you're CEO service. this particular scenario, but, you know, it is what it is, Andre. I wanted, you know, I've got some excerpts of your book that that I've been reading. uh, you know, for the sport, uh, you know the only way to become the best version of yourself is to it. The time value of data is gone by the time you know, your business is moving faster than the data is on the single data set because it's just too damn hard, you know, to drive analysis across And so I could see that I could see the big you know, trillion dollars apple Uh, you know, through data and how they can monetize what Uh, and and maybe some of that limitation, you know, wouldn't have occurred if you stay the price, Uh, that, you know, why couldn't we, you know, execute on and the data cloud does that allow you to participate in that massive, And all of a sudden proof I have become, you know, a prime prospect system, Uh, there's all kinds of, you know, mental models that you completely core in central to a digital enterprise, period. maybe you guys, yourselves and your founders, you know, haven't have aren't able to predict as well. You know, I mean, one of the 100 conversations and, uh, you know, things and it's gonna require something like the data cloud to really power that to the next Everybody says Dave Volonte for the Cube will see you next time
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank Slootman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Scarpelli | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Lee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IOS | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Andre | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Trillion Years Club | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100 conversations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
trillion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
ITT | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
$2 trillion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cloud Azaz | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
next decade | DATE | 0.96+ |
TAM | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
$100 billion | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Enterprise Data Warehouse | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.95+ |
500 different | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
two point | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
D. W. | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
Sarbanes Oxley | PERSON | 0.91+ |
5 | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Snowflake | TITLE | 0.87+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
single data set | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
tens of million times | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
E M. C | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
Lincoln | PERSON | 0.82+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.82+ |
Lukman | PERSON | 0.82+ |
Cuban | PERSON | 0.8+ |
last 40 years | DATE | 0.77+ |
snowflakes | TITLE | 0.75+ |
single enterprise | QUANTITY | 0.64+ |
Tam | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.62+ |
million | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
single day | QUANTITY | 0.49+ |
Cube | PERSON | 0.36+ |
Inderpal Bhandari, IBM | MIT CDOIQ 2020
>>from around the globe If the cube with digital coverage of M I t. Chief data officer and Information quality symposium brought to you by Silicon Angle Media >>Hello, everyone. This is Day Volonte and welcome back to our continuing coverage of the M I t. Chief Data Officer CDO I Q event Interpol Bhandari is here. He's a leading voice in the CDO community and a longtime Cubillan Interpol. Great to see you. Thanks for coming on for this. Especially >>program. My pleasure. >>So when you you and I first met, you laid out what I thought was, you know, one of the most cogent frameworks to understand what a CDO is job was where the priority should be. And one of those was really understanding how, how, how data contributes to the monetization of station aligning with lines of business, a number of other things. And that was several years ago. A lot of change since then. You know, we've been doing this conference since probably twenty thirteen and back then, you know, Hadoop was coming on strong. A lot of CEOs didn't want to go near the technology that's beginning to change. CDOs and cto Zehr becoming much more aligned at the hip. The reporting organizations have changed. But I love your perspective on what you've observed as changing in the CDO roll over the last half decade or so. >>Well, did you know that I became chief data officer in two thousand six? December two thousand and six And I have done this job four times four major overnight have created of the organization from scratch each time. Now, in December of two thousand six, when I became chief data officer, there were only four. Chief Data Officer, uh, boom and I was the first in health care, and there were three, three others, you know, one of the Internet one and credit guns one and banking. And I think I'm the only one actually left standing still doing this job. That's a good thing or a bad thing. But like, you know, it certainly has allowed me to love the craft and then also scripted down to the level that, you know, I actually do think of it purely as a craft. That is. I know, going into a mutual what I'm gonna do. They were on the central second. No, the interesting things that have unfolded. Obviously, the professions taken off There are literally thousands off chief data officers now, and there are plenty off changes. I think the main change, but the job is it's, I think, a little less daunting in terms off convincing the senior leadership that it's need it because I think the awareness at the CEO level is much, much, much better than what it waas in two thousand six. Across the world. Now, having said that, I think it is still only awareness and don't think that there's really a deep understanding of those levels. And so there's a lot off infusion, which is why you will. You kind of think this is my period. But you saw all these professions take off with C titles, right? Chief Data officer, chief analytics officer, chief digital officer and chief technology officer. See, I off course is being there for a long time. And but I think these newer see positions. They're all very, very related, and they all kind of went to the same need which had to do with enterprise transformation, digital transformation, that enterprises chief digital officer, that's another and and people were all trying to essentially feel the elephants and they could only see part of it at the senior levels, and they came up with which have a role you know, seemed most meaningful to them. But really, all of us are trying to do the same job, which is to accelerate digital transformation in the enterprise. Your comment about you kind of see that the seat eels and sea deals now, uh, partnering up much more than in the past, and I think that's in available the major driving force full. That is, in my view, anyway. It's is artificial intelligence as people try to infuse artificial intelligence. Well, then it's very technical field. Still, it's not something that you know you can just hand over to somebody who has the business jobs, but not the deep technical chops to pull that off. And so, in the case off chief data officers that do have the technical jobs, you'll see them also pretty much heading up the I effort in total and you know, as I do for the IBM case, will be building the Data and AI Enablement internal platform for for IBM. But I think in other cases you you've got Chief date officers who are coming in from a different angle. You know, they built Marghera but the CTO now, because they have to. Otherwise you cannot get a I infused into the organization. >>So there were a lot of other priorities, obviously certainly digital transformation. We've been talking about it for years, but still in many organisations, there was a sense of, well, not on my watch, maybe a sense of complacency or maybe just other priorities. Cove. It obviously has changed that now one hundred percent of the companies that we talked to are really putting this digital transformation on the front burner. So how has that changed the role of CDO? Has it just been interpolate an acceleration of that reality, or has it also somewhat altered the swim lanes? >>I think I think it's It's It's Bolt actually, so I have a way of looking at this in my mind, the CDO role. But if you look at it from a business perspective, they're looking for three things. The CEO is looking for three things from the CDO. One is you know this person is going to help with the revenue off the company by enabling the production of new products, new products of resulting in new revenue and so forth. That's kind of one aspect of the monetization. Another aspect is the CEO is going to help with the efficiency within the organization by making data a lot more accessible, as well as enabling insights that reduce into and cycle time for major processes. And so that's another way that they have monitor. And the last one is a risk reduction that they're going to reduce the risk, you know, as regulations. And as you have cybersecurity exposure on incidents that you know just keep keep accelerating as well. You're gonna have to also step in and help with that. So every CDO, the way their senior leadership looks at them is some mix off three. And in some cases, one has given more importance than the other, and so far, but that's how they are essentially looking at it now. I think what digital transformation has done is it's managed to accelerate, accelerate all three off these outcomes because you need to attend to all three as you move forward. But I think that the individual balance that's struck for individuals reveals really depends on their ah, their company, their situation, who their peers are, who is actually leading the transformation and so >>forth, you know, in the value pie. A lot of the early activity around CDO sort of emanated from the quality portions of the organization. It was sort of a compliance waited roll, not necessarily when you started your own journey here. Obviously been focused on monetization how data contributes to that. But But you saw that generally, organizations, even if they didn't have a CDO, they had this sort of back office alliance thing that has totally changed the the in the value equation. It's really much more about insights, as you mentioned. So one of the big changes we've seen in the organization is that data pipeline you mentioned and and cycle time. And I'd like to dig into that a little bit because you and I have talked about this. This is one of the ways that a chief data officer and the related organizations can add the most value reduction in that cycle time. That's really where the business value comes from. So I wonder if we could talk about that a little bit and how that the constituents in the stakeholders in that in that life cycle across that data pipeline have changed. >>That's a very good question. Very insightful questions. So if you look at ah, company like idea, you know, my role in totally within IBM is to enable Ibn itself to become an AI enterprise. So infuse a on into all our major business processes. You know, things like our supply chain lead to cash well, process, you know, our finance processes like accounts receivable and procurement that soulful every major process that you can think off is using Watson mouth. So that's the That's the That's the vision that's essentially what we've implemented. And that's how we are using that now as a showcase for clients and customers. One of the things that be realized is the data and Ai enablement spots off business. You know, the work that I do also has processes. Now that's the pipeline you refer to. You know, we're setting up the data pipeline. We're setting up the machine learning pipeline, deep learning blank like we're always setting up these pipelines, And so now you have the opportunity to actually turn the so called EI ladder on its head because the Islander has to do with a first You collected data, then you curated. You make sure that it's high quality, etcetera, etcetera, fit for EI. And then eventually you get to applying, you know, ai and then infusing it into business processes. And so far, But once you recognize that the very first the earliest creases of work with the data those themselves are essentially processes. You can infuse AI into those processes, and that's what's made the cycle time reduction. And although things that I'm talking about possible because it just makes it much, much easier for somebody to then implement ai within a lot enterprise, I mean, AI requires specialized knowledge. There are pieces of a I like deep learning, but there are, you know, typically a company's gonna have, like a handful of people who even understand what that is, how to apply it. You know how models drift when they need to be refreshed, etcetera, etcetera, and so that's difficult. You can't possibly expect every business process, every business area to have that expertise, and so you've then got to rely on some core group which is going to enable them to do so. But that group can't do it manually because I get otherwise. That doesn't scale again. So then you come down to these pipelines and you've got to actually infuse AI into these data and ai enablement processes so that it becomes much, much easier to scale across another. >>Some of the CEOs, maybe they don't have the reporting structure that you do, or or maybe it's more of a far flung organization. Not that IBM is not far flung, but they may not have the ability to sort of inject AI. Maybe they can advocate for it. Do you see that as a challenge for some CEOs? And how do they so to get through that, what's what's the way in which they should be working with their constituents across the organization to successfully infuse ai? >>Yeah, that's it's. In fact, you get a very good point. I mean, when I joined IBM, one of the first observations I made and I in fact made it to a senior leadership, is that I didn't think that from a business standpoint, people really understood what a I met. So when we talked about a cognitive enterprise on the I enterprise a zaydi em. You know, our clients don't really understand what that meant, which is why it became really important to enable IBM itself to be any I enterprise. You know that. That's my data strategy. Your you kind of alluded to the fact that I have this approach. There are these five steps, while the very first step is to come up with the data strategy that enables a business strategy that the company's on. And in my case, it was, Hey, I'm going to enable the company because it wants to become a cloud and cognitive company. I'm going to enable that. And so we essentially are data strategy became one off making IBM. It's something I enterprise, but the reason for doing that the reason why that was so important was because then we could use it as a showcase for clients and customers. And so But I'm talking with our clients and customers. That's my role. I'm really the only role I'm playing is what I call an experiential selling there. I'm saying, Forget about you know, the fact that we're selling this particular product or that particular product that you got GPU servers. We've got you know what's an open scale or whatever? It doesn't really matter. Why don't you come and see what we've done internally at scale? And then we'll also lay out for you all the different pain points that we have to work through using our products so that you can kind of make the same case when you when you when you apply it internally and same common with regard to the benefit, you know the cycle, time reduction, some of the cycle time reductions that we've seen in my process is itself, you know, like this. Think about metadata business metadata generating that is so difficult. And it's again, something that's critical if you want to scale your data because you know you can't really have a good catalogue of data if you don't have good business, meditate. Eso. Anybody looking at what's in your catalog won't understand what it is. They won't be able to use it etcetera. And so we've essentially automated business metadata generation using AI and the cycle time reduction that was like ninety five percent, you know, haven't actually argue. It's more than that, because in the past, most people would not. For many many data sets, the pragmatic approach would be. Don't even bother with the business matter data. Then it becomes just put somewhere in the are, you know, data architecture somewhere in your data leg or whatever, you have data warehouse, and then it becomes the data swamp because nobody understands it now with regard to our experience applying AI, infusing it across all our major business processes are average cycle time reduction is seventy percent, so just a tremendous amount of gains are there. But to your point, unless you're able to point to some application at scale within the enterprise, you know that's meaningful for the enterprise, Which is kind of what the what the role I play in terms of bringing it forward to our clients and customers. It's harder to argue. I'll make a case or investment into A I would then be enterprise without actually being able to point to those types of use cases that have been scaled where you can demonstrate the value. So that's extremely important part of the equation. To make sure that that happens on a regular basis with our clients and customers, I will say that you know your point is vomited a lot off. Our clients and customers come back and say, Tell me when they're having a conversation. I was having a conversation just last week with major major financial service of all nations, and I got the same point saying, If you're coming out of regulation, how do I convince my leadership about the value of a I and you know, I basically responded. He asked me about the scale use cases You can show that. But perhaps the biggest point that you can make as a CDO after the senior readership is can we afford to be left up? That is the I think the biggest, you know, point that the leadership has to appreciate. Can you afford to be left up? >>I want to come back to this notion of seventy percent on average, the cycle time reduction. That's astounding. And I want to make sure people understand the potential impacts. And, I would say suspected many CEOs, if not most understand sort of system thinking. It's obviously something that you're big on but often times within organisations. You might see them trying to optimize one little portion of the data lifecycle and you know having. Okay, hey, celebrate that success. But unless you can take that systems view and reduce that overall cycle time, that's really where the business value is. And I guess my we're real question around. This is Every organization has some kind of Northstar, many about profit, and you can increase revenue are cut costs, and you can do that with data. It might be saving lives, but ultimately to drive this data culture, you've got to get people thinking about getting insights that help you with that North Star, that mission of the company, but then taking a systems view and that's seventy percent cycle time reduction is just the enormous business value that that drives, I think, sometimes gets lost on people. And these air telephone numbers in the business case aren't >>yes, No, absolutely. It's, you know, there's just a tremendous amount of potential on, and it's it's not an easy, easy thing to do by any means. So we've been always very transparent about the Dave. As you know, we put forward this this blueprint right, the cognitive enterprise blueprint, how you get to it, and I kind of have these four major pillars for the blueprint. There's obviously does this data and you're getting the data ready for the consummation that you want to do but also things like training data sets. How do you kind of run hundreds of thousands of experiments on a regular basis, which kind of review to the other pillar, which is techology? But then the last two pillars are business process, change and the culture organizational culture, you know, managing organizational considerations, that culture. If you don't keep all four in lockstep, the transformation is usually not successful at an end to end level, then it becomes much more what you pointed out, which is you have kind of point solutions and the role, you know, the CEO role doesn't make the kind of strategic impact that otherwise it could do so and this also comes back to some of the only appointee of you to do. If you think about how do you keep those four pillars and lock sync? It means you've gotta have the data leader. You also gotta have the technology, and in some cases they might be the same people. Hey, just for the moment, sake of argument, let's say they're all different people and many, many times. They are so the data leader of the technology of you and the operations leaders because the other ones own the business processes as well as the organizational years. You know, they've got it all worked together to make it an effective conservation. And so the organization structure that you talked about that in some cases my peers may not have that. You know, that's that. That is true. If the if the senior leadership is not thinking overall digital transformation, it's going to be difficult for them to them go out that >>you've also seen that culturally, historically, when it comes to data and analytics, a lot of times that the lines of business you know their their first response is to attack the quality of the data because the data may not support their agenda. So there's this idea of a data culture on, and I want to ask you how self serve fits into that. I mean, to the degree that the business feels as though they actually have some kind of ownership in the data, and it's largely, you know, their responsibility as opposed to a lot of the finger pointing that has historically gone on. Whether it's been decision support or enterprise data, warehousing or even, you know, Data Lakes. They've sort of failed toe live up to that. That promise, particularly from a cultural standpoint, it and so I wonder, How have you guys done in that regard? How did you get there? Many Any other observations you could make in that regard? >>Yeah. So, you know, I think culture is probably the hardest nut to crack all of those four pillars that I back up and you've got You've got to address that, Uh, not, you know, not just stop down, but also bottom up as well. As you know, period. Appear I'll give you some some examples based on our experience, that idea. So the way my organization is set up is there is a obviously a technology on the other. People who are doing all the data engineering were kind of laying out the foundational technical elements or the transformation. You know, the the AI enabled one be planning networks, and so so that are those people. And then there is another senior leader who reports directly to me, and his organization is all around adoptions. He's responsible for essentially taking what's available in the technology and then working with the business areas to move forward and make this make and infuse. A. I do the processes that the business and he is looking. It's done in a bottom upwards, deliberately set up, designed it to be bottom up. So what I mean by that is the team on my side is fully empowered to move forward. Why did they find a like minded team on the other side and go ahead and do it? They don't have to come back for funding they don't have, You know, they just go ahead and do it. They're basically empowered to do that. And that particular set up enabled enabled us in a couple of years to have one hundred thousand internal users on our Central data and AI enabled platform. And when I mean hundred thousand users, I mean users who were using it on a monthly basis. We company, you know, So if you haven't used it in a month, we won't come. So there it's over one hundred thousand, even very rapidly to that. That's kind of the enterprise wide storm. That's kind of the bottom up direction. The top down direction Waas the strategic element that I talked with you about what I said, Hey, be our data strategy is going to be to create, make IBM itself into any I enterprise and then use that as a showcase for plants and customers That kind of and be reiterated back. And I worked the senior leadership on that view all the time talking to customers, the central and our senior leaders. And so that's kind of the air cover to do this, you know, that mix gives you, gives you that possibility. I think from a peer to peer standpoint, but you get to these lot scale and to end processes, and that there, a couple of ways I worked that one way is we've kind of looked at our enterprise data and said, Okay, therefore, major pillars off data that we want to go after data, tomato plants, data about our offerings, data about financial data, that s and then our work full student and then within that there are obviously some pillars, like some sales data that comes in and, you know, been workforce. You could have contractors. Was his employees a center But I think for the moment, about these four major pillars off data. And so let me map that to end to end large business processes within the company. You know, the really large ones, like Enterprise Performance Management, into a or lead to cash generation into and risk insides across our full supply chain and to and things like that. And we've kind of tied these four major data pillars to those major into and processes Well, well, yes, that there's a mechanism they're obviously in terms off facilitating, and to some extent one might argue, even forcing some interaction between teams that are the way they talk. But it also brings me and my peers much closer together when you set it up that way. And that means, you know, people from the HR side people from the operation side, the data side technology side, all coming together to really move things forward. So all three tracks being hit very, very hard to move the culture fall. >>Am I also correct that you have, uh, chief data officers that reporting to you whether it's a matrix or direct within the division's? Is that right? >>Yeah, so? So I mean, you know, for in terms off our structure, as you know, way our global company, we're also far flung company. We have many different products in business units and so forth. And so, uh, one of the things that I realized early on waas we are going to need data officers, each of those business units and the business units. There's obviously the enterprise objective. And, you know, you could think of the enterprise objectives in terms of some examples based on what I said in the past, which is so enterprise objective would be We've gotta have a data foundation by essentially making data along these four pillars. I talked about clients offerings, etcetera, you know, very accessible self service. You have mentioned south, so thank you. This is where the South seven speaks. Comes it right. So you can you can get at that data quickly and appropriately, right? You want to make sure that the access control, all that stuff is designed out and you're able to change your policies and you'd swap manual. But, you know, those things got implemented very rapidly and quickly. And so you've got you've got that piece off off the off the puzzle due to go after. And then I think the other aspect off off. This is, though, when you recognize that every business unit also has its own objectives and they are looking at some of those things somewhat differently. So I'll give you an example. We've got data any our product units. Now, those CEOs right there, concern is going to be a lot more around the products themselves And how were monetizing those box and so they're not per se concerned with, You know, how you reduce the enter and cycle time off IBM in total supply chain so that this is my point. So they but they're gonna have substantial considerations and objectives that they want to accomplish. And so I recognize that early on, and we came up with this notion off a data officer council and I helped staff the council s. So this is why that's the Matrix to reporting that we talked about. But I selected some of the key Blair's that we have in those units, and I also made sure they were funded by the unit. So they report into the units because their paycheck is actually determined. Pilot unit and which makes them than aligned with the objectives off the unit, but also obviously part of my central approach so that I can disseminate it out to the organization. It comes in very, very handy when you are trying to do things across the company as well. So when we you know GDP our way, we have to get the company ready for Judy PR, I would say that this mechanism became a key key aspect of what enabled us to move forward and do it rapidly. Trouble them >>be because you had the structure that perhaps the lines of business weren't. Maybe is concerned about GDP are, but you had to be concerned with it overall. And this allowed you to sort of hiding their importance, >>right? Because think of in the case of Jeannie PR, they have to be a company wide policy and implementation, right? And if he did not have that structure already in place, it would have made it that much harder. Do you get that uniformity and consistency across the company, right, You know, So you will have to in the weapon that structure, but we already have it because way said Hey, this is around for data. We're gonna have these types of considerations that they are. And so we have this thing regular. You know, this man network that meat meets regularly every month, actually, and you know, when things like GDP are much more frequently than that, >>right? So that makes sense. We're out of time. But I wonder if we could just close if you could address the M I t CDO audience that probably this is the largest audience, Believe or not, now that it's that's virtual definitely expanded the audience, but it's still a very elite group. And the reason why I was so pleased that you agreed to do this is because you've got one of the more complex organizations out there and you've succeeded. And, ah, a lot of the hard, hard work. So what? What message would you leave the M I t CDO audience Interpol? >>So I would say that you know, it's it's this particular professional. Receiving a profession is, uh, if I have to pick one trait of let me pick two traits, I think what is your A change agent? So you have to be really comfortable with change things are going to change, the organization is going to look to you to make those changes. And so that's what aspect off your job, you know, may or may not be part of me immediately. But the those particular set of skills and characteristics and something that you know, one has to, uh one has to develop or time, And I think the other thing I would say is it's a continuous looming jaw. So you continue sexism and things keep changing around you and changing rapidly. And, you know, if you just even think just in terms off the subject areas, I mean this Syria today you've got to understand technology. Obviously, you've gotta understand data you've got to understand in a I and data science. You've got to understand cybersecurity. You've gotta understand the regulatory framework, and you've got to keep all that in mind, and you've got to distill it down to certain trends. That's that's happening, right? I mean, so this is an example of that is that there's a trend towards more regulation around privacy and also in terms off individual ownership of data, which is very different from what's before the that's kind of weather. Bucket's going and so you've got to be on top off all those things. And so the you know, the characteristic of being a continual learner, I think is a is a key aspect off this job. One other thing I would add. And this is All Star Coleman nineteen, you know, prik over nineteen in terms of those four pillars that we talked about, you know, which had to do with the data technology, business process and organization and culture. From a CDO perspective, the data and technology will obviously from consent, I would say most covert nineteen most the civil unrest. And so far, you know, the other two aspects are going to be critical as we move forward. And so the people aspect of the job has never bean, you know, more important down it's today, right? That's something that I find myself regularly doing the stalking at all levels of the organization, one on a one, which is something that we never really did before. But now we find time to do it so obviously is doable. I don't think it's just it's a change that's here to stay, and it ships >>well to your to your point about change if you were in your comfort zone before twenty twenty two things years certainly taking you out of it into Parliament. All right, thanks so much for coming back in. The Cuban addressing the M I t CDO audience really appreciate it. >>Thank you for having me. That my pleasant >>You're very welcome. And thank you for watching everybody. This is Dave a lot. They will be right back after this short >>break. You're watching the queue.
SUMMARY :
to you by Silicon Angle Media Great to see you. So when you you and I first met, you laid out what I thought was, you know, one of the most cogent frameworks and they came up with which have a role you know, seemed most meaningful to them. So how has that changed the role of CDO? And the last one is a risk reduction that they're going to reduce the risk, you know, So one of the big changes we've seen in the organization is that data pipeline you mentioned and and Now that's the pipeline you refer that you do, or or maybe it's more of a far flung organization. That is the I think the biggest, you know, and you know having. and the role, you know, the CEO role doesn't make the kind of strategic impact and it's largely, you know, their responsibility as opposed to a lot of the finger pointing that has historically gone And that means, you know, people from the HR side people from the operation side, So I mean, you know, for in terms off our structure, as you know, And this allowed you to sort of hiding their importance, and consistency across the company, right, You know, So you will have to in the weapon that structure, And the reason why I was so pleased that you agreed to do this is because you've got one And so the you know, the characteristic of being a two things years certainly taking you out of it into Parliament. Thank you for having me. And thank you for watching everybody. You're watching the queue.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
December | DATE | 0.99+ |
Inderpal Bhandari | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seventy percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five steps | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ninety five percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two thousand | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Angle Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
hundred thousand users | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one hundred thousand | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two traits | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Northstar | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two aspects | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
four pillars | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first response | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
North Star | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Syria | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
three things | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
over one hundred thousand | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
several years ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
one trait | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
nineteen | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
one way | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
four major pillars | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
last half decade | DATE | 0.92+ |
Ibn | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Interpol | PERSON | 0.91+ |
Bhandari | PERSON | 0.91+ |
first observations | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
each time | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
hundreds of thousands of experiments | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
CDO | TITLE | 0.89+ |
two pillars | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
a month | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
one aspect | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
twenty thirteen | DATE | 0.85+ |
Jeannie | PERSON | 0.84+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
four pillars | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.8+ |
Dee Mooney, Micron Gives | Micron Insights 2019
>>live from San Francisco. It's the Q covering Micron Insight 2019 >>Not to You, by Micron. >>Welcome back to San Francisco, everybody. This is a Micron Insight 2019 and you're watching the Cube, the leader in live coverage on Day Volonte with my co host, David Floyd. Di Mooney is here. She's the executive director of Micron gives. That's right. Give us the story. What's happening with Micron gives Tech for good. We love the tech for good stories. Tech companies are really taking this seriously. This is not just lip service. Give us the update. >>That's right. That's right. We're so proud of our company that they established a foundation 20 years ago to give back to our global communities. And since then we have given $115 million away and over 10,000 grands. So we have seen a lot of different opportunities in our global communities, and it's just been fabulous that our company supports >>you talk today about water dot or what's going on there. Why is that important in what your role there. >>So what we did is we started taking a look at an organization that we have. We have started recently binning beam or engaged with basic human needs and the grants that those support And when we were taking a look at, Really, what is the primary basic human need? Way discovered? It really is the need for water, and there are millions of people that cannot access this precious resource, and it's just was really surprising to us to think way, take it for granted so much. But yet it is very difficult to get. So as we took a look at this, there was a lot of information that this organization collects. And so we thought, Well, this will be a great opportunity for us to utilize information to enrich and bring in some of our advanced computing expertise along with our philanthropy, help them reach their mission even greater. >>This is huge. I was an event earlier this week, and the keynote speaker was an ultra marathoner, and he literally at one point he ran 4500 miles across the continent of Africa. He and two other ultra runners and people were asking what was The biggest challenge was that the heat was the painting. You know, the biggest challenge was see the challenges of of the community's getting part of the water. That was the number one thing that you know. He left the impression So I mean, this is a huge global problem. >>It really is. And our manufacturing operations were global, and we are located in water scarce areas of the world. And so what really became you know, it's a Micron issue to one of our biggest environmental issues that we talked about, and water dot org's has just been a >>leader in this space, and it has been just fabulous to work with on >>really, they have so much passion and dedication towards this. They've been ableto help. 22 million people already. >>All right, so they're lining up for the main stage. Just give us real quick some of the grants that you guys have. >>Last year at this event, we announced our advancing curiosity, and we announced three recipients last year, and since then we have four more. That's U C L. A. All right T, University of Texas at Austin and University of Washington. >>Awesome. That's great. Listen, congratulations. D on all your great work. We really appreciate your ticket sometime in the queue. All right, and thank you for watching her body. We're back with our next guest from Micron inside. 2019 on the Cube, right back.
SUMMARY :
It's the Q covering the leader in live coverage on Day Volonte with my co host, David Floyd. And since then we have given $115 million away and over 10,000 Why is that important in what your role and the grants that those support And when we were taking a look at, and he literally at one point he ran 4500 miles across the continent of Africa. And so what really became you know, it's a Micron issue to one of our biggest environmental really, they have so much passion and dedication towards this. Just give us real quick some of the grants that you guys have. and we announced three recipients last year, and since then we have four more. 2019 on the Cube,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Di Mooney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Floyd | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dee Mooney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$115 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
University of Texas | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Micron | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
4500 miles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
University of Washington | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
three recipients | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
millions of people | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
22 million people | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
earlier this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
over 10,000 grands | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two other ultra runners | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
one point | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Austin | LOCATION | 0.87+ |
Micron gives | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
Micron Insight 2019 | TITLE | 0.8+ |
Micron Insights | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
U C L. A. | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
four more | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
T | PERSON | 0.67+ |
Africa | LOCATION | 0.58+ |
org | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
Cube | PERSON | 0.46+ |
Day Volonte | EVENT | 0.46+ |
Keynote Analysis | IFS World 2019
>>from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the Q covering I. F s World Conference 2019. Brought to you by I F s. Hi, buddy. Welcome to Boston. You're watching the cubes coverage of I s s World in the Heinz Auditorium in Boston. I'm Day Volonte with my co host, Paul Gill and Paul. This is the the largest enterprise resource planning software company that our audience probably has never heard of. This is our second year covering I f s World. Last year was in Atlanta. They moved to Boston. I f s is a Swedish based company. They do about $600 million in annual revenue, about 3700 employees. And interestingly, they have a development center in Sri Lanka, of all places. Which is kind of was war torn for the last 15 years or so, but nonetheless, evidently, a lot of talent and beautiful views, but so welcome. >>Thank you, Dave. I have to admit, before our coverage last year, I had never even heard of this company been around this industry for more than 30 years. Never heard of this company. They've got 10,000 customers. They've got a full house next door in the keynote and very enthusiastic group. This is a focus company. It's a company that has a lot of ah ah, vision about where wants to go some impressive vision documents and really a company that I think it's coming out of the shadows in the U. S. And it will be a force to be reckoned with. >>So I should say they were founded in the in the mid 19 eighties, and then it kind of re architected their whole platform around Client server. You remember the component move? It was a sort of big trends in the in the nineties. In the mid nineties opened up offices in the United States. We're gonna talk to the head of North America later, and that's one of the big growth areas that growing at about three. They claim to be growing at three x the overall market rate, which is a good benchmark. They're really their focus is really three areas e r. P asset management software and field service management, and they talk about deep functionality. So, for instance, they compete with Oracle ASAP. Certainly Microsoft and in four company we've covered in four talks a lot about the last mile functionality. That's not terminology that I f s uses, but they do similar types of things. I'll give you some examples because, okay, what's last mile? Functionality? Things like, um, detailed invoicing integration, contract management. Very narrow search results on things like I just want to search for a refurbished parts so they have functionality to allow you to do that. Chain. A custom e custody chain of custody for handling dangerous toxic chemicals. Certain modules to handle FDA compliance. A real kind of nitty gritty stuff to help companies avoid custom modifications in certain industries. Energy, construction, aerospace and defense is a big area for that. For them, a CZ well as manufacturing, >>there's a segment of the e r P market that often is under uh is under seeing. There's a lot of these companies that started out in niches Peoples off being a famous example, starting out on a niche of the market and then growing into other areas. And this company continues to be very focused even after 35 years, as you mentioned, just energy aerospace, a few construction, a few basic industries that they serve serve them at a very deep level focused on the mid market primarily, but they have a new positioning this year. They're calling the challengers for the challengers, which I like. It's a it's a message that I think resonates. It's easy to understand there position their customers is being the companies that are going to challenge the big guys in their industries and this time of digital transformation and disruption. You know, that's what it's all about. I think it's a great message of bringing out this year. >>Of course I like it because the Cube is a challenger, right? Okay, even though we're number one of the segments that we cover, we started out as a sort of a challenger. Interestingly, I f s and the gardener Magic Corners actually, leader and Field Service Management. They made an acquisition that they announced today of a company called Asked. He asked, U S he is a pink sheet OTC company. I mean, they're very small is a tuck in acquisition that maybe they had a They had a sub $20 million market cap. They probably do 25 $30 million in revenue. Um, Darren rules. The CEO said that this place is them is the leader in field service management, which is interesting. We're gonna ask him about that to your other point. You look around the ecosystem here that they have 400 partners. I was surprised last night. I came early to sort of walk around the hall floor. You see large companies here like Accenture. Um and I'm surprised. I mean, I remember the early days when we did the service. Now conferences 2013 or so you didn't see accent. You're Delloye E Y p W c. Now you see them at the service now event here that you see them? I mean, and I talked to essential last night. They said, Yeah, well, we actually do a lot of business in Europe, particularly in the Scandinavian region, and we want to grow the business in the U. S. >>Europe tends to be kind of a blind spot for us cos they don't see the size of the European market, all the activities where some of the great e. R. P. Innovation has come out of Europe. This company, as you mentioned growing three times the rate of the market, they have a ah focus on your very tight with those customers that they serve and they understand them very well. And this is a you can see why it's centuries is is serving this market because, you know they're simply following the money. There's only so much growth left in the S a P market in the Oracle market. But as the CEO Darren said this morning, Ah, half of their revenues last year were from net new customers. So that's that's a great metric. That indicates that there's a lot of new business for these partners to pursue. >>Well, I think there's there's some fatigue, obviously, for big, long multi year s AP integrations, you're also seeing, you know, at the macro we work with Enterprise Technology Research and we have access to their data set. One of the things that we're seeing is a slowdown in the macro. Clearly, buyers are planning to spend less on I T in the second half of 2019 than they did in the first half of 2019 and they expect to spend less in Q four than they expected to in July. So things are clearly softening at the macro level. They're reverting back to pre 2018 levels but it's not falling off a cliff. One of the things that I've talked to e t. R about the premise we put forth love to get your thoughts is essentially we started digital transformation projects, Let's say in earnest in 2016 2017 doing a lot of pilots started kind of pre production in 2018. And during that time, what people were doing is they were had a lot of redundancy. They would maintain the legacy systems and they were experimenting with disruptive technologies. You saw, obviously a lot of you. I path a lot of snowflake and other sort of disruptive technology. Certainly an infrastructure. Pure storage was the beneficiary of that. So you had this sort of dual strategy. We had redundancy of legacy systems, and then the new stuff. What's happening now is, is the theory is that we're going into production. Would digital transformation projects and where were killing the legacy stuff? Okay, we're ready to cut over >>to a new land on that anymore, >>right? We're not going to spend them anymore. Dial that down. Number one. Number two is we're not just gonna spray and pray on all new tech Blockchain a i rp et cetera. We're gonna now focus on those areas that we think are going to drive business value. So both the incumbents and the disruptors are getting somewhat affected by that. That slowdown in that narrowing of the focused. And so I think that's really what's happening. And we're gonna, I think, have to absorb that for a year or so before we start to see new wave of spending. >>There's been a lot of spending on I t over the last three years. As you say, driven by this need, this transition that's going on now we're being going to see some of those legacy systems turned off. The more important thing I have to look at, I think the overall spending is where is that money being spent is being spent on on servers or is it being spent on cloud service is, and I think you would see a fairly dramatic shift going on. They're so the overall, the macro. I think it's still healthy for I t. There's still a lot of spending going on, but it's shifting to a new area there. They're killing off some of that redundancy. >>Well, the TR data shows couple things. There's no question that server and storage spending is has been declining and attenuating for a number of quarters now. And there's been a shift going on from that. Core infrastructure, obviously, into Cloud Cloud continues its steady march in terms of taking over market share. Other areas of bright spots security is clearly one. You're seeing a lot of spending in an analytics, especially new analytics. I mentioned Snowflake before we're disrupting kind of terror Data's traditional legacy enterprise data warehouse market. The R P. A market is also very hot. You AI path is a company that continues to extend beyond its its peers, although I have to say automation anywhere looks very strong. Blue Prison looks very strong. Cloudera interestingly used to be the darling is hitting sort of all time lows in the E. T R database, which is, by the way, that one of the best data sets I've ever seen on on spending enterprise software is actually still pretty strong. Particularly, uh, you know, workday look strong. Sales force still looks pretty strong. Splunk Because of the security uplift, it still looks pretty strong. I have a lot of data on I f s Like you said, they don't really show up in the e t R survey base. Um, but I would expect, with kind of growth, we're seeing $600 million. Company hopes to be a $1,000,000,000 by 2022 2021. I would think they're going to start showing up in the spending >>service well again in Europe. They may be They may be more dominant player than we see in the US. As I said, I really had not even heard of the company before last year, which was surprising for a company with 10,000 customers. Again, they're focused on the mid market in the mid market tends to fly a bit under the radar. Everyone thinks about what's happening in the enterprise is a huge opportunity out there. Many more mid market companies and there are enterprises. And that's a that's been historically a fertile ground for e. R. P. Companies to launch. You know J. D. Edwards came out of the mid market thes are companies that may end up being acquired by the Giants, but they build up a very healthy base of customers, sort of under the radar. >>Well, the other point I wanted to make I kind of started to about the digital transformation is, as they say, people are getting sort of sick of the big, long, ASAP complicated implementations. As small companies become midsize companies and larger midsize companies, they they look toward an enterprise resource planning, type of, of platform. And they're probably saying, All right, wait. I've got some choices here. I could go with an an I F. S, you know, or maybe another alternative. T s a p. You know, A S A P is maybe maybe the safe bet. Although, you know, it looks like i f s is got when you look around at the customers, they have has some real traction, obviously a lot of references, no question about it. One of things they've been digging for saw this gardener doing them for a P I integrations. Well, they've announced some major AP I integrations. We're gonna talk to them about that and poke it that a little bit and see if that will So to solve that criticism, that what Gardner calls caution, you know, let's see how real that is in talking to some of the customers will be talkinto the executives on members of the ecosystem. And obviously Paul and I will be giving our analysis as well. Final thoughts >>here. Just the challenge, I think, is you note for these midmarket focus Cos. Has been growing with their customers. And that's why you see of Lawson's in the JD Edwards of the World. Many of these these mid market companies eventually are acquired by the big E R P vendors. The customers eventually, if they grow, have to go through this transition. If they're going to go to Enterprise. The R P you know, they're forced into a couple of big choices. The opportunity and the challenge for F s is, can they grow those customers as they move into enterprise grade size? Can they grow them with with E. I. F s product line without having them forcing them to transition to something bigger? >>So a lot of here a lot of action here in Boston, we heard from several outside speakers. There was Linda Hill from Harvard. They had a digital transformation CEO panel, the CEO of soo say who will be on later uh PTC, a Conway, former PeopleSoft CEO was on there. And then, of course, Tony Hawk, which was a lot of fun, obviously a challenger. All right, so keep it right there, buddy. You're watching the Cube live from I F s World Conference at the Heinz in Boston right back, right after this short break.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by I F s. house next door in the keynote and very enthusiastic group. functionality to allow you to do that. And this company continues to be very You look around the ecosystem here that they have 400 partners. But as the CEO Darren said this morning, Ah, half of their revenues last One of the things that I've talked to e t. R about the premise we put forth love to get your thoughts is essentially That slowdown in that narrowing of the focused. There's been a lot of spending on I t over the last three years. I have a lot of data on I f s Like you said, As I said, I really had not even heard of the company before last year, which was surprising for a We're gonna talk to them about that and poke it that a little bit and see if that will So to solve The customers eventually, if they grow, have to go through this transition. So a lot of here a lot of action here in Boston, we heard from several outside speakers.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Linda Hill | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
July | DATE | 0.99+ |
Atlanta | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
$600 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sri Lanka | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
$1,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Paul Gill | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Darren | PERSON | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
400 partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
2016 | DATE | 0.99+ |
25 $30 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
U. S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Gardner | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
about $600 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Scandinavian | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Giants | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
more than 30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
about 3700 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last night | DATE | 0.99+ |
PeopleSoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Asked | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
mid nineties | DATE | 0.99+ |
mid 19 eighties | DATE | 0.99+ |
Heinz Auditorium | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
I f s | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
nineties | DATE | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
Blue Prison | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Magic Corners | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
I. F s World Conference 2019 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
sub $20 million | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first half of 2019 | DATE | 0.96+ |
Lawson | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
second half of 2019 | DATE | 0.95+ |
this year | DATE | 0.95+ |
Conway | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Cloudera | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Tony Hawk | PERSON | 0.93+ |
Enterprise Technology Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
last 15 years | DATE | 0.92+ |
J. D. Edwards | PERSON | 0.91+ |
IFS World 2019 | EVENT | 0.9+ |
three areas | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.89+ |
last three years | DATE | 0.88+ |
three times | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.87+ |
second year | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
CEO | PERSON | 0.86+ |
PTC | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.85+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.84+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.84+ |
35 years | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Number two | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
I f s World | EVENT | 0.82+ |
about three | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
I F s World Conference | EVENT | 0.81+ |
Andrew Tennant, Cisco & Mike Bundy, Pure Storage | Pure Accelerate 2019
>> from Austin, Texas. It's Theo Cube, covering your storage. Accelerate 2019. Brought to you by pure storage. >> Howdy, y'all Welcome back to the cubes. Coverage of Day one of pure accelerate 19 from Austin, Texas. I'm Lisa Martin. My co host is Day Volonte. We got a couple of gentlemen here chatting with us. Next, we've got one of our alumni. Mike Bundy's back head of Cisco Worldwide alliances for appear. Mike. Welcome back. >> Thank you. >> Sporting the very dapper >> It's not ours today, but it's enough. >> I like it. Very subtle on we've got Andrew Tenant joining us for the first time Senior manager Worldwide sales at Cisco Andrew, Welcome to the Cube. >> Thanks for having us. >> So we know we've had lots of conversations with Cisco and Cure Isis. Go live. Just a few months ago, Mike was on with this bright orange blazer. You guys have been partners for about four years now, Mike, let's start with you and talk about the evolution of that partnership from Bogota Market. A field A sales perspective, right? Overall partnership. How are things going? >> Well, things were great from a mo mentum perspective. We're we're on track to eclipse You know, I'm not supposed talk about a lot of numbers, but in the next year we will eclipse together a billion dollar run rate >> with partnership, which is tremendous milestone >> in a 4 to 5 year regulations. So things were, well, you know, it started from the field and what customers were requiring. And now, in the last, um, year, we've we've added about six new CDs were up to 22 we have three in the queue between now and the calendar year. So in terms of the growth, the product development and momentum, it's it's tremendous. And what we'll talk about today will be kind of one of the next generations and errors that that will hit on regarding this. >> And you guys were also we had a conversation a little bit ago with with Nathan Hall. Really, this partnership with Cisco and Pure is now getting started in the field, as you were talking about, but it's all the way down into the engineering level in terms of being very pervasive throughout. You guys have really achieve that. Yes, >> Yeah, top to bottom, right From From that field, engagement began. It was watching our customers embrace purest innovation. Right? And everywhere you turned pure was showing up, and it was it was really the field. Say, Hey, we got to get on board with this. And Tim Shanahan, who's part of our correctional organization on the descent aside, said, Hey, this is a big deal. We need to get in front of this thing. So that's really you. Mention where it started. And now we're doing everything from integrating products, right, integrating management tools to try to bring that together for our customers. And it's It's an awesome partnership. >> Absolutely. So where's the product focus. Where do we start? >> Yes, so you joked, right? Fibre channel. I think I remember Fibre Channel from many years ago. It Cisco, and then you look back and suddenly it's not dead, right? The truth is, five channels the best protocol for mission critical storage traffic that's ever been built. It's probably best critical out there for that. It's not sexy, though, right, so we can't took our eye off the ball at Cisco. But as we now develop these next generation storage technologies, there's never been a more important time to bring that switching fabric into play right It's absolutely critical that we have the right tools to accomplish what our customers trying to deliver from applications standpoint. So the agility, the visibility, just the overall performance is more important today. That was back in sort of that the heyday of fibre channel, if you will. Right? So the partnership that we're working on right now is making sure that we're we're maximizing the outcome of these investments. Custer's making with all of yours storage offerings, leveraging a sand infrastructure that's compatible with it and really gonna make it sing. >> And you're right and you go back 10 plus years and it was a vice scuzzy was coming in, but had some f f C bigots is that I will never hang on to win the NFC. Oh, we now you got N v m e over fabric. We'll talk about that. But so from pure perspective, you have always had to pay attention to that segment of the market. Guys went hard after the high end. Of'em sees business, which was heavy fiber channel, absolutely early days. >> Yeah, I mean four out of five of our razor attached fibre channel to a customer's environment. It is core to what we do. And we're excited about the resell opportunity that we just started with pure because, you know, Andrew and I joke last week, but we put pen to paper in terms of we believe our our introduction of this is a re silk and help them grow their sand business by 35 40%. And that's the kind of disruption that we're seeing with our A raise in the market. And we think because of how we're evolving customers to modernize those networks, that we can drag the Sisko Fibre Channel business right along with it. >> This is a sorry Mike. This is a re sell pure reselling wth the MDS product line. How is you the pure Channel? Responding to this news? >> They love it because it's it's a new buying center, you know that they're getting to talk to Ah, and it helps us, you know, establish Maur, you know, understanding the customers, whole business, not just from a storage perspective. So >> So how was envy? Emmy changing landscape? What do you guys seeing there? I mean, you guys, I think the first another first Charlie didn't mention it today on stage, So money first. It's hard to keep track of. But how is that affecting? You know what's going on in the field? >> Yeah. So I mean, again, it's the timing of this generational shift to next. Gen. Sarge, envy me being probably the most critical of that. If we look at what happened with all flash A raise, for example, all of those ended up on critical mission critical workloads and all ended up on fibre Channel 80. 85% of those end up on that legacy technology because it was so capable of getting the job done. Envy me is gonna take us another leap forward so customers will be challenged toe have something that lives both in the what they have today and bridges them to that future proof state. Right? So it's absolutely critical that you have tools that are gonna let you adopt envy me as it makes sense on carry it operationally alongside the same modality that you had for those workloads in the past, right? That's the key. Is that the folks we're gonna own this stuff going forward to the ones who own it now, right? Just with maybe older technology >> and the business impact is what you could do more with less performance, lower costs, more >> last performance, visibility right so you can help. Troubleshoot way had a situation not that long ago where a customer had Honore, not it was a competitive ray, right? It was getting hammered and it was locking up. And when they looked at the the forensics coming off, the rate said they had 4000 I ops off of that array. A very nominal amount. It should have been the problem. It shifted the focus elsewhere. Well, using some of the telemetry built into the MPs platform, it was obvious that there were 25,000 I ops hitting that array because VM, where was doing a lot of command control traffic to the array. So having that visibility at the's scales and speeds, if you don't know what you're doing, you can't see what's going on. You could be flying blind and struggling and everybody loses there. So >> you know we're excited about this because we don't want to bring our rays into an environment that's not suited for high end performance and reliability, cause that's what we've kind of made our brand on when it comes to customer networks, especially with the X 60 and nineties that we launched the year ago. They're all envy me ready. So we want to make sure that, as we did, ploy that that the entire infrastructure's ready and Cisco, in my opinion, has the best. Every product is 64 gig capable. It's envy me today. And so we're ready, you know, envy me, you know, in the end, if you will. So when when the host are ready to take advantage of this full network and full storage system, we're ready. Um, an Andrew also mentioned analytics. So, you know, >> we we >> extract ourselves on the analytics capabilities of our system as it works today with after one and so that allows us to, you know, very quickly using machine learning solve most of our customers problems. In fact, we open about 85% of our own customers tak cases for them because we predict when things were going to get rough and bumpy. So as we extend and bridge that together with what Cisco has and their Sandwich Analytics capability, it's gonna make the experience way different than it would be on a competitive sand fabric and a competitive storage array, whether it's flash or not. So that's that's what we're doing together, which makes fiber Channel better and more unique than it has been in the past. >> In terms of adoption. You mentioned when the host guys already, What's the blocker? There's just silicon. Is it just, >> you know, you could You could take Cisco's example. You know, they're they're looking at the new memory technology. And how do they apply that to the interface adapter? And how do you handle that situation? So, you know, as they evolve their next platform, it will be pervasive in that. And I'm sure that the other you know, host providers are gonna be doing >> standards standards. Low hanging fruit was envy me over converge Ethernet, right, because that was kind of the first place to start. But reality is weaken were the only vendor who can provide both of those in the Cisco side. Right. So we have the same tooling on the same, actually administrative tooling on on either. Right. So that's ah, terrific. >> And it's not just the infrastructure from the hostess, the operating system as well. So you know Lennox can take advantage of it in a different way. So, you know, we're seeing most of our deployments today, our fibre channel over Ethernet, because the the customer base that air deploying that are purely a Linux based environment. So they're able to do that. So, as you know, not all of our enterprising and commercial customers run that environment. So it's It's a little bit of the technology. It's a little bit of the Intel cycle. It's a little bit of the operating system, but the point is, we're ready. And there's a long, long road map. You know, for customers if we go this route, >> when should customers start thinking about this terms >> immediately? Right? Ultimately, it's not a question of if it's a question of when, but if they're, if they're getting things ready now, if you're making investment today, you can make an investment today that accommodates what you're doing today. Like back in the day. If we were selling a storage platform, the sandwich is sort of this necessary thing behind the scenes. That wasn't necessarily you could actually let it sit there for a couple of generations of the storage it was supporting. That's no longer going to be the case right, because, quite simply, the evolution on the storage front. And it's so much faster that you need to make sure the thing you're plugging it into. That's a simple question for any customer there. What'd you plugging this into right? Because at the end of the day, if it's just that that old san you have sitting around it may or may not be capable. Regardless of Endor, right, it's it's gonna actually diminished value you get in the time value of that investment you've made in this incredible platform. >> So where are you having these customer conversations that we talk about the joint go to market in the field? You know, it's It's not just about fibre channel and speed and storage, these air business critical work loads that are being protected and run and access to be able to extract all these insights. When you're talking with customers, where are you? You're not at the storage. I've been level. I imagine this is a much more business intensive conversation. It's a >> great question. Go ahead. >> So I think you know people that are driving the cloud platform strategy for the infrastructure. They obviously need to understand how. How does this work in a hybrid cloud or multi cloud environment? Then you've got, you know, the people that are developing the mission Mission critical business APS. Whether that's you know, Oracle s a p et cetera, et cetera. But it's also the non traditional business APS that are coming to play things that leverage stores that are file or object oriented, or kubernetes or things like that. It's so you're having discussions with the teams that are deploying the apse for the business and that will drive and dictate the requirements. Is that you know, we're trying to help the infrastructure on the cloud infrastructure teams adapt to >> multi cloud piece gets interesting here, right? Because us now talk about building massively scalable distributed systems, and you're not gonna be able to You don't want to necessarily ship all your data around, but you want to ship the metadata and be smart enough to know where the data is so you can go ship to compute right to the data, right? And I >> think that that's another interesting thing. And a positive aspect of leveraging some things we've already done with Cisco is you know they have the concept of a C I anywhere. No, you know, just like we're doing with Cloud Block store of extending that storage capability into the cloud. Cisco has done the same with a C I. So it's not just it's not sure, making sure the workload in the data payload our mobile, but also the application. And that's, you know, yes, that that may not be the case today for Fibre Channel, but the technology is there if the customer demands it. So that's 60% of Cisco's revenue in the data center comes from his networking core. That's what we're more excited about. The next generation's partnership is we feel like we've done a good job and built momentum with the computer part of their business, and I think as we evolve into this part of the business, it's gonna It's gonna be better for customers. In the end, >> it's either today, customers gonna spend more time operating this than anything, right, and really, that's all about visibility. Meantime, the resolution just how quickly they can make sure that those this thing's running and and as proactively get in front of congestion and issues at a time if they can. So it's Ah, it's a complimentary hardware software problem solved. You have to be able to do things at extremely high rates of speed with visibility I've never seen before. So analytics built into a six incredibly important stuff to get that streaming right out of the chip so you could tell what's going on at any level of the stack. Where is Like I said today, we've seen many cases now where their challenges in the network and in the sand and on the array and everyone's blind to it because our >> engineers love it because the monitoring and the scoping capability that were required, a lot of sand fabrics to deploy would require extra tools. Extra tap kits Cisco has at built in the A six so literally. It's just enable that with software. And you can do all the diagnostics you ever wanted to do at the at the wire and the fiber level, >> as opposed to a discreet probe. Exactly a disruptive drives the >> costs way out. The complexity reduces risk troubleshooting floor space, you know, the whole you know >> that's big time >> based. So today there's an issue. Last night Hey, Mike, what happened last night? I know. Let me know. That happens again. That's pretty much the ticket Close, right? We could actually go back in time now kind of a DVR and actually see now for the first time in a sand fabric what's actually happening and go back and reconstruct it to figure out how we proactively prevent it going on from the next time. So >> so, Mike, Last question. We're out of time. But last question for you. Everybody says future proof. Pardon? Everybody says future proved how are is pure delivering that with Cisco. What is it gonna mean to that business leader that I have an infrastructure in place that will truly be the food? Your proof? >> Good question. So you know, it's evergreen is the term that pure uses for you know what we do. So you never buy the same storage twice, right? And if you look at the platform that Cisco has for MDS, it is clearly capable to 400 gig capability. And today most networks are purchased for 30 to get capable with 16 gig optics, so they have 32 64. There's a long way to go here so the platform and their innovation will continue this to be, you know, a future proof network that marries up with our evergreen story. So we were excited We wouldn't get in this relationship if we felt that it was not gonna provide the same level of benefits and standard that we have for our own customers. So >> correct. Mike Andrew. Thank you for joining David me on the Q. But way. Look forward to hearing what happens in your five of the pure Cisco relationship. I know. We'll probably stay tuned. I know we'll see you again. Thank you for your time. Thanks for David. Dante. I Lisa Martin. You're watching the cue from pure accelerate 19.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by chatting with us. sales at Cisco Andrew, Welcome to the Cube. So we know we've had lots of conversations with Cisco and Cure Isis. Well, things were great from a mo mentum perspective. So things were, well, you know, it started from the field And you guys were also we had a conversation a little bit ago with with Nathan Hall. And everywhere you turned pure So where's the product focus. So the partnership that we're Oh, we now you got N v m e over fabric. that we just started with pure because, you know, Andrew and I joke last week, How is you the pure Channel? and it helps us, you know, establish Maur, you know, understanding the customers, I mean, you guys, I think the first another first Charlie didn't mention it today on stage, carry it operationally alongside the same modality that you had for those So having that visibility at the's scales and speeds, if you don't know what you're doing, And so we're ready, you know, envy me, you know, so that allows us to, you know, very quickly using machine You mentioned when the host guys already, What's the blocker? And I'm sure that the other you know, host So we have the same tooling on the same, So it's It's a little bit of the technology. And it's so much faster that you So where are you having these customer conversations that we talk about the joint go to market in great question. So I think you know people that are driving the cloud platform strategy for the infrastructure. already done with Cisco is you know they have the concept of a C I anywhere. in the network and in the sand and on the array and everyone's blind to it because And you can do all the diagnostics you ever wanted to do at the at the wire and the fiber Exactly a disruptive drives the you know, the whole you know That's pretty much the ticket Close, What is it gonna mean to that business leader that I have an infrastructure in place that will truly So you know, it's evergreen is the term that pure uses for Thank you for joining David me on the Q. But way.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tim Shanahan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andrew | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike Bundy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
60% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
4 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
400 gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nathan Hall | PERSON | 0.99+ |
16 gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Austin, Texas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Andrew Tennant | PERSON | 0.99+ |
64 gig | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Charlie | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.99+ |
last night | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last night | DATE | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
32 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mike Andrew | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Andrew Tenant | PERSON | 0.98+ |
next year | DATE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Gen. | PERSON | 0.98+ |
25,000 I ops | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 85% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five channels | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.98+ |
10 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
64 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Theo Cube | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Pure | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
MDS | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Lennox | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Cisco Worldwide | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
4000 I ops | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
5 year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
35 40% | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Emmy | PERSON | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Endor | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Sisko Fibre Channel | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
. 85% | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Breaking Analysis: Storage Spending 2H 2019
>> from the Silicon Angle Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts. It's the cue now Here's your host Day Volonte. >> Hello, everyone, this is David lot. They fresh fresh off the red eye from VM World 2019. And what I wanted to do was share with you some analysis that I've done with our friends at E. T. R. Enterprise Technology Research. We've begun introducing you to some of their data. They have this awesome database 4500 panel, a panel of 4500 end users end customers, and they periodically go out and do spending surveys. They've given me access to that spending data and what I wanted to do because because you had a number of companies announced this this quarter, I wanted to do a storage drill down so pure. Announced in late July, Del just announced yesterday late August. Netapp was mid August. HP was last week again late August, and IBM was mid July. So you have all these companies, some of which are pure plays like pure netapp. Others of you know, big systems companies on DSO. But nonetheless, I wanted to squint through the data and share with you the storage spending snapshot for the second half of 2019. So let's start with the macro. >> What you heard on the conference calls was some concern about the economy. There's no question that the tariffs are on people's minds, particularly those with large exposure exposure in China. I mean, Del obviously sells a lot of PCs in China, so they're very much concerned about that. IBM does a lot of business there, pure, really. 70% appears business roughly is North America, so they're not as exposed so But the macro is probably looks like about 2% GDP growth for the quarter i. D. C. Has the overall tech market growing at two ex GDP. Interestingly, a Gartner analyst told me in May on the Cube that there is no correlation between GDP and I t spend, which surprised me. Some people disagree with that, but But that surprised me. But nonetheless, we we still look at GDP and look at that ratio. Sometimes the other macro is component costs for years. For the storage business the last several years, NAND pricing has been a headwind. Supply has been down, it's kept prices up. It has kept all flash arrays more expensive relative to some of the spinning disc spread the brethren something that we thought would attenuate sooner. It finally has. Nan pricing is now a tailwind, so prices air coming down. What that does is it opens up new workloads that we're really kind of the domain of spinning disk before big data kind of workloads is an example. Not exclusively big data, but it just opens up more workloads for storage companies, particularly Flash Cos The other big macro we're seeing is people shifting to subscription models. They want to bring that cloud like model to the data wherever two lives on Prem in ah, hybrid environment in a public cloud and company storage companies trying to be that that data management plane across clouds, whether on prime it. And that's a That's a big deal for a lot of these companies. I'll talk a little bit more about that, so you're seeing this vision of a massively parallel, scalable distributed system play out >> where >> data stays where it lives. Edge on Prem Public Cloud and storage is really a key part of that. Obviously, that's where the data lives, but you're not seeing data move across clouds so much. What you are seeing is metadata, move and compute. Move to the data so that type of architecture is being set up. It's supported by architecture's, not the least of which are all flash, and so I want to get into it. >> Now I want to share with you some data on this slide. If you wouldn't mind bringing it up. Alex on spending momentum. So the title size spending moment of pure leads, the storage packs and what this shows is the vendor on the left hand side. And it essentially looks at the breakdown of the spending survey where e t r ask the buyers of the different companies products. What percent of the spending is going to go toward replacing? They're gonna replace the vendor. Are they gonna decrease? Spend. That's the bright red is replace. The sort of pinkish is decreased, the spending. The gray is flat. The sort of evergreen forest green is increase in the lime. Green is ad, so if you take the lime green in the forest, green ad and the grow on you subtract the rest. You get the net score, so the higher the net score, the better. you can see here that pure storage has the highest net score by far 48%. I'll show you some data later. That correlates to that when we pull out some of the data from the income statements. >> So this is Ah, the >> July 2019 spending intention surveys specifically asking relative to the second half what the spending intentions are. So this looks good for pure on again. I'll show you Cem, Cem Cem Income State income statement data that really affirms this Hewlett Packard Enterprise actually was pretty strong in the spending survey. Particularly nimble is growing HP Overall, the storage business was was down a little bit, I think, three points, but nimble was up 28%. So you're seeing some spending activity there. Netapp did not have a great quarter. They were down substantially. I'll show you that in a minute. On dhe, it looks like they've got some work to do. Deli M. C. I had a flat quarter. Dell has a such a huge install base. They're everywhere on DSO. Everybody wants a piece of their pie. Del. After the merger of the acquisition of the emcee, their storage share declined. They then bounce back. They had a much, much stronger year last year, and now it's sort of a dogfight with the rest. IBM IBM is in a major cycle shift. IBM storage businesses is heavily tied to its mainframe businesses. Mainframe business was way, way down, its overall systems. Business was down, even though power was up a little bit. But the mainframe is what drives the systems business, and it drags along a lot of storage. IBM has got a new mainframe announcement that it's got to get out. It's got a new high end storage announcement that it's got to get out, and it's really relying on that. So you can see here from the E T. R data, you know, pure way out ahead of the pack continues to gain share about over 1000 respondents to this. So a lot of shared accounts by shared accounts mean the number of accounts that that actually have some combination of multiple storage vendors. And so they were able to answer this 1068 respondents pure the clear winner here. Now let's put this into context. So the next slide I want to show you some of the key performance indicators from the June quarter off the income statements. >> So again you see, I get the vendor. The revenue for the quarter of the year to year growth for that quarter relative to last year. The gross margin in the free cash flow, just some of the key performance indicators that I'd like to look at. So look at pure Let's go, Let's go to the third column Look at growth pure 28% growth. Del flat 0% for this is just for storage. There's a storage growth. NETAPP down 16% end up in a bad quarter, HP down 3%. IBM down 21% Do due to the cycle that I discussed, You see the revenue, um, pure, growing very, very fast. But you know, from a small base or at 396 million versus compared that to Dell's 4.2 billion net APs 1,000,000,000 plus H p e. Almost a billion in IBM not nearly as large. And then look at the gross margin line. Pure is the industry's leading gross margin. It's just slightly above 69%. Dell is a blended that Asterix is a blended gross margin, so it includes PCs, servers, service's of V M wear, everything and, of course, storage. So now, when dehl was a public company before it went private, it's gross. Margins were in the high teens. So Del is in gross margin heaven with with both E, M C and V M wear now as part of its portfolio NetApp high gross margins of 67%. But that gross margin is largely driven by its gross margins from software and maintenance. And so that's a screen considerable contributor. Their product gross margins air in the mid fifties, kind of where I think E. M. C. Probably is these days. And when the emcee was a public company, it's gross. Margins were in the mid sixties, but then, as it was before, went private. I think it was dipping into the high fifties as I recall you CHP again, that's a blended gross margin, just roughly around 34%. I don't have as much visibility on their their storage gross margins. I would I would say they are below, in my view, what DMC and net out well below what Netapp would be on then IBM. That's again blended gross margin includes hardware. Software service is 47.4% probably half or more of IBM businesses. Professional service is on. IBM has, of course, a large software business as well. So and then the free cash flow you can see pure crushing it from the standpoint of of gaining share, I mean way, way ahead of the other market players, but only 14 million in free cash flow. So coming from a much, much smaller base, however pure, is purely focused on storage. So there are Andy. All their R and D is going into that storage space. DEL. Free cash flow very large. 3.4 billion that again is across the entire company. Net App. You can see 278 million h p e 648 million great quarter for HP from a free cash flow standpoint, I think year to date they're probably 838 140 million. So big Big quarter. For them. An IBM A 2.4 billion again. Dell, HP, IBM. That's across the company, as is the gross margin. So the the spending data from E. T. R. Really shows us that pure, strong Aziz showed you that very high net score and the intentions look strong, so I would suspect pure is going to continue to lead in the market share game. I don't see that changing. Certainly there's no evidence in the data. I think I think everybody else is in a sort of a dogfight del holding firm, you know, 0%. You'd like to see a little bit of growth out of that, but I think Del is actually, you know, Dell's key metric is, Are we growing faster than the market? That's that's they're sort of a primary criterion in metric for Dell is to grow faster than the overall market because that means you're growing some share. I think Del is comfortable with that. Della's gross margins actually were helped this this quarter by the fact that Dell server business was down 12%. There was a higher storage mix, so it propped up the margin a little bit. But again, generally speaking, it looks like pure is the market share winner here, but much, much smaller than the other guys. HB limbo very strong, and it shows up in the survey data from E T. R. And an IBM just needs to get a new product cycle out. So we'll come back. >> We'll take a look at this in in in in January and see how you know what it looked like and will continue to fall. Obviously, the income statement and the public reporting pure accelerate is coming up next month. Justin in mid September. I have no doubt, you know, pure has been first in a lot of different areas, right? They were first really all flash Ray. The only all flash. You're a company that ever reached escape velocity. They were they in Nutanix for the first kind of new $1,000,000,000 companies that people said would never have a billion dollar company. Pure is a pure play storage company, you know? Well, over a billion. Now, you know, they were first with that evergreen model. They made a lot of play there. You know, the first with envy, Emmy and first with the Nvidia relationships with Superior likes to be first. I have no doubt and accelerate next month down in Austin, curious that they picked Austin in Dell's backyard. I have no doubt that they're gonna have some other firsts at that show. Cuba be there watching just off of the emerald, the other big player here. Of course, that I'm not showing his v. San visa is very, very strong. You know, the D. E. T. Our data shows that, and certainly the data from the income statement shows of'em were NSX, the networking products, their cell phone to find network in their self defined storage of the the the V San. Very, very strong Pat Girl singer on the Cube. We asked him last week, Thio, take us through. So if someone has big memories and one of them was sort of East san, Excuse me. One of them was V San, and the board meeting at with Joe Tucci was on the Vienna where board really put a lot of pressure on Pat's and you can't do this to me. It's funny. Emcee had the shackles on the M, where for a number of years, but the shackles are off and visa is very, very strong. So these are some of the things we're keeping an eye on. Thanks for watching everybody busy day Volante, Cuban sites. We'll see you next time
SUMMARY :
It's the cue And what I wanted to do was share with you some analysis that I've done with our friends at E. But the macro is probably looks like about 2% GDP growth for the quarter not the least of which are all flash, and so I want to get into it. the forest, green ad and the grow on you subtract the rest. So the next slide I want to show you some of the key So the the spending data from E. T. R. Really shows us that Our data shows that, and certainly the data from the income statement shows of'em were NSX,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nvidia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
China | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
47.4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
July 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
1068 respondents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
4.2 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
January | DATE | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
E. T. R. Enterprise Technology Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
May | DATE | 0.99+ |
late July | DATE | 0.99+ |
Thio | PERSON | 0.99+ |
next month | DATE | 0.99+ |
Emcee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
3.4 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
mid September | DATE | 0.99+ |
67% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
28% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$1,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
396 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Austin | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Emmy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
48% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
21% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Joe Tucci | PERSON | 0.99+ |
278 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second half | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
late August | DATE | 0.99+ |
16% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
12% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2.4 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
mid August | DATE | 0.99+ |
0% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
June quarter | DATE | 0.99+ |
mid July | DATE | 0.99+ |
4500 end users | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Del | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vienna | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
David | PERSON | 0.98+ |
838 140 million | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
yesterday late August | DATE | 0.98+ |
Aziz | PERSON | 0.98+ |
14 million | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over a billion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
dehl | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
around 34% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
firsts | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Silicon Angle Media Office | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
NSX | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
VM World 2019 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Deli M. C. | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Asterix | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
third column | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Kit Colbert & Krish Prasad, VMware | VMworld 2019
>> live from San Francisco, celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum, World 2019 brought to you by the M Wear and its ecosystem partners. >> Hello, Welcome back, everyone to the Cubes Live coverage of the Emerald 2019. I'm John Career with Lycos Day, Volante Dave. 10 years covering the Q Weird Mosconi and 2010 boy Lots changed, but >> it's still the >> platform that Palmer Ritz laid out. But the stuff filling in 10 years later. >> Okay, you call that software mainframe and Robin came in so I can't call Mainframe Way >> Have leaders from PM Wears Largest business unit. The Cloud Platform Business Kid Colbert to CTO and Christmas R S v P and General Manager Guys, Thanks for coming on The key. Appreciate. >> Yeah, that's for having us. The >> world's your business units smoking hot. It's very popular, like you run around doing meetings. Cloud platform is the software model that's 10 years later actually happening at scale. Congratulations. What's the What's the big news? What's the big conversation for you guys? >> Yeah, the biggest news this week is the announcement of project specific, and, um, it's about taking the platform a Jess, um, hundreds of thousands of customers on it and bringing together communities were just now very popular with the developers and that black form together so that operators, on the one hand, can just deal with the platform they love. And the developers can deal with the kubernetes layer that they love. >> It's interesting to watch because, you know, the whole end user computing stack that was laid out 10 years ago is actually happening now, Assassin see, sass business models. We all see the and half of them is on the success of Cloud. But interesting to see kubernetes, which we've been following since the report started. Open stack days. You saw that emerging. Everyone kind of saw that. And it really became a nice layer. And the industry just create as a de facto. Yeah, you guys were actually driving that more forward. So congratulations on that. >> That's sitting it >> natively in V sphere is interesting because you guys spend a ton of time. This is a core product for you guys. So you're bringing something native into V sphere? I'm sure there's a lot of debates internally how to do that, kid. What's that? What is the relevance workers. You guys have a lot of efficiencies and be severe, but bring in kubernetes is gonna give you some new things. What, >> So the thinking is really you know, it's Christmas mentioning. How do we take this proven platform? Move it forward. Customers have moved millions of work clothes on top of the sphere, operate them in production, the Prussian great capabilities, and so they'd be able to be very successful in that. And so the question is, how do we help them move forward in the kubernetes? You know, you mentioned Crew readies is still fairly young, the ecosystem around. It's still somewhat immature, still growing right, and it's a very different environment than what folks are used to who used the sphere. So there's a big challenge that customers have around managing multiple environments. All the training that's different, all the tools that are different so we can actually take their investments. They've already made into V sphere leverage and extend those into the kubernetes world that's really powerful. We'll help our customers take all these millions of workloads and move them forward. It's >> interesting because we were always speculating about being where I started Jerry Chan when he was on yesterday. He's been of'em where since early days, you know, but looking at VM where when they went to their you guys went back to your core When we be cloud air kind of win its way and then you deal them is on since the stock price has been going great, So great chair older takeover value there. But you got clarity around what cloud was. And as you look at the operator target audience, you guys have the operators and the devil and ops is critical. So you guys have been operating a lot of work, Liz and I think this is fascinating. So the role of containers is super relevant because you got V EMS and containers. So again, the debate continues. >> Well, I think >> Tainer is wrong. Where Bond, It's interesting conversation because kubernetes is orchestrating all that >> while the snarky treat tweet Oh day and you guys feel free to come. It was Oh, I thought we started launch pivotal. So we didn't have to run containers on virtual machines. Yeah, we know that people run containers on bare metal. They run containers and virtual machines, but >> yeah, It's a debate that that we hear pop up on the on the snarky Twitter feeds and so forth. We'll talk to customers about it. You know, this whole VM versus container debate, I think, really misses the point because it's not really about that. What it's about is how do I actually operate? These were close in production, right? This kind of this three pillows we talk about build, run, manage. Custer's want to accelerate that They won't do that with enterprise, great capabilities with security. And so that's where it really gets challenging. And I think you know, we've built this amazing ecosystem around desire to achieve that. And so that's what we're taking forward here. And, yes, the fact that we're using fertilization of the covers, that's an implementation detail. Almost. What's more, valuables? All the stuff above that the manageability, the operational capabilities. That's a real problem. It seems to >> me, to the business impact because, okay, people going to go to the cloud, they're gonna build cloud native acts. But you've got all these incumbent companies trying not to get disrupted to trying to find new opportunities, playing offense and defense at the same time, they need tooling to be able to do that. They don't want to take their e r p ap and stick it in the cloud, right? They want to modernize it. And you know you're not gonna build that overnight in the cloud anyway, so they need help. >> That's the the key move that we made here. If you if you think about it, customers don't have kubernetes experts right today and most of them in their journey to the mortar naps. They're saying, Hey, we need to set up two stacks. At least we are if we immerse stack that we love. And now communities are developers laws. So we have to stand up and they don't have any in house experts to do that right? And with this one move, we have actually collapsed it back to one stack. >> Yeah, I think it's a brilliant move. Actually, it's brilliant because the Dev ops ethos has proven everyone wants to be there, all right. And the question is, who's leading? Who is lagging? So ops has traditionally lagged. If you look at it from the developer standpoint, you guys have not been lagging on the we certainly have tons of'em virtualization been standardized. Its unifying. Yeah, the two worlds together, and it really as we've been calling it cloud two point. Oh, because if you look at what hybrid really is, it's cloud two point. Oh, yeah. Cloud one data was Dev Ops Storage and compute Amazon. You're born in the cloud. We we have no I t department 50 people. Why would we ever and developers are the operators? Yeah, so we shall. Enterprise scale. It's not that easy. So I love to get your thoughts on how you guys would frame the cloud two point. Oh, Visa vi. If cloud one does storage and compute and Amazon like scale, what is cloud to point out to you? >> Yeah, well, I think so. Let's talk about the cloud journey. I think that's what you're getting at here. So here's how it discuss it with customers. You are where you are today. You have your existing apse. A lot of them are monolithic. You're slow to update. Um, you know, so forthright. And then you have some of the cloud NATO nirvana over here. We're like everything's re architected. It's Micro Service's got all these containers off, so >> it doesn't run my business >> well, yeah, well, that's what I want to get to. I think the challenge, the challenge is it's a huge amount of effort to get there, right, All the training we're talking about, all the tooling and the all the changes there, and people tend to look at. This is a very binary thing, right that you're there. Here where you are, you're in the club, New Nirvana. People don't often talk about what's in the middle and the fact that it's a spectrum. And I think what we used to get a V M, where is like, let's meet customers where they are, You know, I think one of the big realizations we had, it's not. Everyone needs to get every single application on this far side over here. Some halfs, your pieces, whatever you know, it's fine to get them a little bit of the way there, and so one of the things that we saw with the M A coordinated us, for example, was that people there was a pent up demand to move to the public cloud. But it was challenging because to go from a visa environment on Prem to an eight of US native environment to change a bunch of things that tooling changes like the environment a little bit different, but with a mark, our native us, there's no modifications at all. You just little evey motion it. And some people have you motioning things like insanely fast now, without modifying the half you can't get you know something you have to suddenly better scalable. But you get other cloud benefits. You get things like, Oh, my infrastructure is dynamic. I can add host dynamically only pay for what I need. Aiken consume this as a service. And so we help moving. We have to move there. There were clothes a little bit in the middle of the spectrum there, and I think what we're doing with Project Pacific and could realise is the same thing. They start taking advantage of these great kubernetes capabilities for their existing APs without modification. So again, kind of moving them further in that middle spectrum and then, you know, for the absolute really make a difference to their business. They can put in the effort to get all the way over there, >> and we saw that some of the evidence of some challenges of that shiny new trend within the dupe ecosystem. Big data objects to army. Who doesn't love that concept, right? Yeah, map produced. But what happened was is that the infrastructure costs on the personnel human capital cost was so massive that and then cloud cloud came along and >> just go out. There is also the other point about just just just a bespoke tooling that >> technology, right, Then the disruptions to create, you know to that, then the investments that it takes. Two >> you had a skill and you had a skills gap in terms of people have been. So that brings us back to So how do you address that problem? Because most of the audience out here, not developers. Yeah. Yeah. Total has the developers connection. So >> this is one of the really cool things about Pacific that what we've done with Pacific when you look at it from an I T. Operations, one of you that person sees v sphere the tool they already know and use understand it. Well, when a developer looks at it, they see kubernetes. And so this is two different viewpoints. Got like, you know, the blind men around the elephant. But, um but the thing is is actually a singular thing in the back end, right? You know, they have these two different views. And so the cool thing about us, we can actually bring items and developers together that they can use their own language tools process. But there's a common thing that they're talking about. They have common visibility into that, and that's super, super powerful. And when you look at, it also is happening on the kubernetes side is fully visible in the V's here side. So all these tools that already work against the sphere suddenly light up and support kubernetes automatically. So again, without any work, we suddenly get so much more benefit. >> And the category Buster's, they're going on to that. You're changing your taking software approach that your guys No, you're taking it to the software developer world. It's kind of changing the game. One of things. I want to get your thoughts on Cloud to point out because, you know, if computing storage was cloud one dato, we're seeing networking and security and data becoming critical ingredients that are problems statement areas people are working on. Certainly networking you guys are in that. So as cloud chip one is gonna take into the fact that messy middle between, you know, I'm on here and then I want the Nirvana, as always, the origination story and the outcomes and stories. Always great. But the missing messy middle. As you were pointing out, it's hard. How do you guys? >> And if you look at the moves that we made in the Do You know about the big fusion acquisition that remained right, which happened, like a month ago, and it was about preparing the platform, our foray I animal or clothes? So really, what we're trying to do is really make sure that the history of platform is ready for the modern applications, right? I am along one side communities applications, you know, service oriented applications. All of them can land on the same platform and more and more. Whether it's the I am l or other application, they're being written on top of communities that structures code. Yeah, nothing like Jenna's well, so enable incriminating will help us land all the modern applications on top of the same platform that our customers are used to. So it's a huge kind of a inflection point in the industry from my >> wealthy earlier point, every CEO I talked to said, I want to get from point A to point B and I wanna spend a billion dollars to get there. I don't wanna have to hire some systems integrator and outsource to get any there. Show me how I get without, you know, destroying my >> business. How did we meet the customers where they're at, right? Like what? The problem with this, the kind of either or model you're here you're there is that there's a huge opportunity costs. And again, Well, if you will just need a little bit of goodness, they don't need the full crazy nirvana Goodness right? And so we enable them to get that very easily in automated way, right? If you'd just been any time re factoring or thinking through this app that takes months or even a year or more, and so you know that this the speed that we can unleash her The velocity for these customers is >> the benefit of that. Nirvana is always taken out of context because people look at the outcome over over generations and saying, Well, I want to be there but it all starts with a very variable basis in shadow. I used to call it, but don't go in the cloud and do something really small, simple. And then why? This is much more official. I like this stack or this approach. That's ultimately how it gets there. So I got to get I got to get that point for infrastructures code because this is what you're enabling. Envies, fearful when I see I want to get your reaction. This because the world used to be. And I ask Elsa on this years ago, and he kind of validated it. But because he's old school, Intel infrastructure dictated to the applications what it could do based on what it could do. Now it's flipped upside down with cloud platform platform and implies enabling something enabling platform. Whatever you call the APs are dictating for the infrastructure. I need this. That's infrastructure is code. That's kind of what you're saying is that >> I mean, look kubernetes broader pattern time. It said, Hey, I can declare what I want, right, and then the system will take care of it and made in that state. I decided state execution is what it brought to the table, and the container based abs, um, have already been working that way. What this announcement does with Project Pacific is that the BM applications that our customers built in the past they are going to be able to take advantage of the same pattern, just the infrastructure escort declarative and decide state execution That that's going to happen even for the old workload, said our customer service >> and they still do viens. I mean, they're scaled 1000 the way >> they operate the same pattern. I >> mean, Paul Morris doesn't get enough credit for the comedy made in 2010. He called it the hardened top. Do you really care what's underneath if it's working effectively? >> Well, I mean, I think you know the reality today is that even though containers that get all get a lot of coverage and attention, most were close to being provisioned. New workloads even are being provisioning v EMS, right? If you look at AWS, the public clouds, I mean, is the E c to our ah go compute engine. Those service's those VM so once they're getting heavily used. And so the way we look at it, if we want to support everything. And it's just going to give customers a bunch of tools in their tool box. And let's put on used the right tool for the right job. Right? That's what the mentality >> that's really clouds. You know, Chris, I want to get your you know, I want to nail you down on the definition of two point. Uh, what is your version? Come on. We keep dodging around, get it out. Come on. >> I think we touched on all aspects of it. Which one is the interesting, less court allowing the consumer of the cloud to be able to dictate the environment in which the applications will operate and the consumer is defining it or the developers to defining it. In this case, that, to me, is the biggest shift that we have gone through in the Colorado. Yeah, and we're just making our platform come to life to support >> that. We're taking the cube serving. We'll put all together, and we want the community to define it, not us. What does it explain? The honest what it means to be a project and has a project Get into it. An offering? >> I mean, so Project Pacific is vey sphere, right? I mean, this is a massive, rethinking re architecture of Easter. Like pretty much every major subsystem component within Visa has been updated with this effort. Um, what we're doing here is what we've technically announced is actually what we call a technical preview. So saying, Hey, this is technology we're working on. We think it's really interesting We want to share with the public, get the public's feedback, you know, figure out a way on the right direction or not. We're not making any commitment, releasing it or any time frames yet. Um, but so part of that needed a name, right? And so because it is easier, but it's a specific thing. We're doing the feast here, so that's where the project comes from. I think it also gives that, you know, this thing has been a huge effort internally, right? There's a lot of work that's gone into it. So you know, it has some heft and deserves a name Min itself. >> It's Dev Ops to pointed. Your reds bring in. You making your infrastructure truly enable program out from amble for perhaps a tsunami. >> The one thing I would say is we wouldn't announce it as a project if it was not coming soon. I mean, we still are in the process. Getting feedback will turn it on or not. But it it's not something that is way out. Then it's It is going to come. >> It's a clear direction. It's a statement of putting investment into his code and going on to course correct. Get some feedback at exactly. But it's pretty obvious you can go a lot of pain. Oh, yeah, isn't easy button for combat. He's >> easy on the >> future. I think it's a great move. Congratulations. We're big fans of kubernetes. So the guys last night having a little meeting Marriott thinking up the next battle plans for game plan for you guys. So, yeah, I >> thought this is just the tip of the iceberg. We had a lot of really, really cool stuff we're doing. >> We're gonna be following the cloud platform. Your progress? Certainly. Recovering. Cloud two point. Oh, looking at these new categories that are emerging again. The end state is Dev Ops Program ability. Apple cases, the Cube coverage, 10th year covering VM world. We're in the lobby of Mosconi in San Francisco. I'm John Favorite Day Volonte. Thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
brought to you by the M Wear and its ecosystem partners. Hello, Welcome back, everyone to the Cubes Live coverage of the Emerald 2019. But the stuff filling in 10 years later. The Cloud Platform Business Kid Colbert to CTO Yeah, that's for having us. What's the big conversation for you guys? And the developers can deal with the kubernetes layer that they love. It's interesting to watch because, you know, the whole end user computing stack that was laid out 10 years ago is actually You guys have a lot of efficiencies and be severe, but bring in kubernetes is gonna give you some new things. So the thinking is really you know, it's Christmas mentioning. So the role of containers is super relevant because you got V EMS and containers. Where Bond, It's interesting conversation because kubernetes is orchestrating all that while the snarky treat tweet Oh day and you guys feel free to come. And I think you know, And you know you're not gonna build that overnight That's the the key move that we made here. And the question is, who's leading? And then you have some of the cloud NATO nirvana over here. of the way there, and so one of the things that we saw with the M A coordinated us, and we saw that some of the evidence of some challenges of that shiny new trend within the dupe ecosystem. There is also the other point about just just just a bespoke tooling that technology, right, Then the disruptions to create, you know to that, then the investments that it Because most of the audience out here, not developers. this is one of the really cool things about Pacific that what we've done with Pacific when you look at it from into the fact that messy middle between, you know, I'm on here and then I want the Nirvana, So it's a huge kind of a inflection point in the industry without, you know, destroying my and so you know that this the speed that we can unleash her The velocity for these customers is So I got to get I got to get that point for infrastructures code because this is what you're enabling. the old workload, said our customer service I mean, they're scaled 1000 the way I He called it the hardened top. And so the way we look at it, if we want to support everything. You know, Chris, I want to get your you know, I want to nail you down on the definition of two point. less court allowing the consumer of the cloud to be able to dictate We're taking the cube serving. get the public's feedback, you know, figure out a way on the right direction or not. It's Dev Ops to pointed. I mean, we still are in the process. But it's pretty obvious you can go a lot of pain. So the guys last night having a little meeting Marriott thinking up the next battle plans for We had a lot of really, really cool stuff we're doing. We're in the lobby of Mosconi in San Francisco.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Paul Morris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Liz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Elsa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
M Wear | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Colorado | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
John Career | PERSON | 0.99+ |
1000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
PM Wears | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jerry Chan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 years later | DATE | 0.99+ |
one stack | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palmer Ritz | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 people | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Robin | PERSON | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Marriott | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
two different views | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
two stacks | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Krish Prasad | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Bond | PERSON | 0.97+ |
a month ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
10th year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Jenna | PERSON | 0.96+ |
Project Pacific | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
two different viewpoints | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one move | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
last night | DATE | 0.96+ |
two worlds | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ | |
this week | DATE | 0.95+ |
Kit Colbert | PERSON | 0.94+ |
three pillows | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Mosconi | LOCATION | 0.93+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
billion dollars | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
hundreds of thousands of customers | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
two point | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Christmas | EVENT | 0.9+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Volante Dave | PERSON | 0.89+ |
Cubes | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Pacific | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
half | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Prussian | OTHER | 0.87+ |
VMworld 2019 | EVENT | 0.86+ |
millions of work clothes | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Colbert | PERSON | 0.86+ |
Kid | PERSON | 0.83+ |
point B | OTHER | 0.82+ |
New Nirvana | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
VM | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.79+ |
John Favorite Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.77+ |
nirvana Goodness | ORGANIZATION | 0.76+ |
one side | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
Dev | TITLE | 0.75+ |
single application | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
Q Weird Mosconi | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
Veum | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
NATO nirvana | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
Pacific | LOCATION | 0.68+ |
Visa vi. | ORGANIZATION | 0.67+ |
readies | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
cloud one | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
Eric Herzog, IBM Storage | VMworld 2019
>> live from San Francisco, celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum, World 2019 brought to you by the M Wear and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back to San Francisco. Day three of our coverage here on the Cube Of'em world 2019. I'm John Wall's Glad to have you here aboard for our continuing coverage here Day Volonte is also joining me, as is the sartorially resplendent Eric Herzog, cm of and vice president. Global storage channels that IBM storage. Eric, good to see you and love the shirt. Very >> nice. Thank you. Well, always have a wine shirts when I'm on the Cube >> I love in a long time Cuba to we might say, I'm sure he's got the record. Yeah, might pay. Well, >> you and pattern, neck and neck. We'll go to >> the vault. And well, >> since Pat used to be my boss, you know, couch out a path. >> Well, okay. Let the little show what IBM think. Maybe. Well, that's OK. Let's just start off a big picture. We're in all this, you know. Hybrid. Multilingual. This discussion went on this week. Obviously, just your thoughts about general trends and where the business is going now supposed to wear? Maybe we're 23 years ago. Well, the >> good thing is for IBM storage, and we actually came to your partner and titty wiki Bond when our new general manager, Ed Walsh, joined. And we came and we saw Dave and John at the old office are at your offices, and we did a pitch about hybrid multi cloud. Remember that gave us some feedback of how to create a new slide. So we created a slide based on Dave's input, and we were doing that two and 1/2 years ago. So we're running around telling the storage analyst Storage Press about hybrid multi cloud based on IBM storage. How weaken transparently move data, things we do with backup, Of course. An archive. You've got about 450 small and medium cloud providers. Their backup is a service engine. Is our spectrum protect? And so we talked about that. So Dave helped us craft the slide to make it better, because he said, we left a couple things >> out that Eric >> owes you. There were a few other analysts I'm sure you talked to and got input, but but us really were the first toe to combine those things in your in your marketing presentations. But >> let's I'd love to get >> an update on the business. Yes, help people understand the IBM storage organization. You guys created the storage business, you know, years and years and years ago. It's a it's a you know you've got your core business, which is column arms dealers. But there's a lot of Regent IBM, the Cloud Division. You've got the service's division, but so help us understand this sort of organizational structure. So >> the IBM story division's part of IBM Systems, which includes both the mainframe products Z and the Power Server entities. So it's a server in storage division. Um, the Easy guys in particular, have a lots of software that they sell and not just mainframe. So they have a very, very large software business, as do we. As you know, from looking at people that do the numbers, We're the second largest storage software company in the world, and the bulk of that software's not running on IBM gear. So, for example, spectrum protect will back up anyone's array spectrum scale and our IBM Cloud Object storage are sold this software only software defined as the spectrum virtualized. You could basically create a J. Bader Jabo after your favorite distributor or reseller and create your honor. Rates are software, but the all of the infrastructure would actually not be ours, not branded by us. And you call us for tech support for the software side. But if you had a bad power supplier fan, you'd have to call, you know, the reseller distributor said this very robust storage software business. Obviously you make sure that was compatible with the other server elements of IBM systems. But the bulk of our storage is actually sitting connect to some server that doesn't have an IBM logo on it. So that's the bulk of our business connected to Intel servers of all types that used to include, of course, IBM Intel Server division, which was sold off to Lenovo. So we still have a very robust business in the array space that has nothing to do with working on a power machine are working on a Z machine, although we clearly worked very heavily with them and have a number of things going with him, including something that's coming very shortly in the middle of September on some new high end products that we're going to dio >> went 90 Sea Counts All this stuff. Do they >> count to give IBM credit for all the storage that lives inside of the IBM Cloud? Do you get you get credit for that or >> not get credit for that? So when they count our number, it's only the systems that we sell and the storage software that we sell. So if you look at if we were a standalone company, which would include support service made everything, some of which we don't get credit for, right, the support and service is a different entity at IBM that does that, UM, the service's group, the tech support that all goes to someone else. We don't have a new credit >> so hypothetical I don't I don't think this is the case, but let's say hypothetically, if pure storage sold an array into IBM Cloud, they would get credit for it. But if you're array and I'm sure this happens is inside of the IBM, you don't get credit for it. >> That's true interesting, so it's somewhat undercounts. Part of that is the >> way we internally count because we're selling it to ourselves. >> But that's it. >> It's not. It's more of an accounting thing, but it's different when we sell the anybody else. So, for example, we sell the hundreds of cloud providers who in theory compete with the IBM Cloud Division >> to you Get credit for that. You get credit for your own away. That's way work. But if we were standing >> on coming for, say, government, we were Zog in store and I bought the company away, we would be about a $6.3 billion standalone storage software company. That's what we would be if we were all in because support service manes. If we were our own company with our own right legal entity, just like net app or the other guys, we'd be Stanley would be in that, you know, low $6 billion range, counting everything all in. When we do report publicly, we only report our storage system because we don't report our storage software business. And as you notice a few times, our CFO has made comments. If we did count, the storage software visit would be ex, and he's publicly stated that price at least two times. Since I've been an idea when he talks about the software on, but legally we only talk about IBM storage systems. When he publicly state our numbers out onto Wall Street, that's all >> we publicly report. So, um, you're like, you're like a walking sheet of knowledge here, but I wonder if you could take the audience through the portfolio. Oh, it's vast. How should we think about it? And the names have changed. You talk about, you know, 250 a raise, whatever it is the old sand volume control. And now it's a spectrum virtualized, >> right? So take us to the portfolio. What's the current? It's free straight for. >> We have really three elements in the portfolio, all built around, if you will, solution plays. But the three real elements in the portfolio our storage arrays, storage systems, we have entry mid range and high end, just like our competitors do. We lead with all flash, but we still sell hybrid and obviously, for backup, an archive. We still sell all hard drive right for those workloads. So and we have filed blocking object just like most other guys do, Um, for an array, then we have a business built around software, and we have two key elements. Their software defined storage, and we saw that software completely stand alone. It happens, too, by the way, be embedded on the arrays. So, for example, Dave, you mentioned Spectrum virtualized that ship's on flash systems and store wise. But if you don't want our raise, we will sell you just spectrum virtualized alone for block spectrum scale for Big Big Data A. I file Workloads and IBM caught object storage, which could all of them could be bought on an array. But they also could be bought. Itjust Standalone component. Yes, there's a software so part of the advantage we feel that delivers. It's some of the people that have software defined storage, that air raid guys. It's not the same software, so for us, it's easier for us to support and service. It's easier for a stack developing have leading it. Features is not running two different pieces of software running, one that happens to have a software on Lee version or an array embedded version. So we've got that, and then the third is around modern data protection, and that's really it. So a modern data protection portfolio built around spectrum, protect and Protect Plus and some other elements. A software to find storage where we sell the software only, and then arrays. That's it. It's really three things and not show. Now they're all kinds components underneath the hood. But what we really do is we sell. We don't really run around and talk about off last race. We talk about hybrid multi cloud. Now all of our flash raise and a lot of our software defined storage will automatically tear data out, too. Hybrid multi cloud configurations. We just So we lead with that same thing. We have one around cyber resiliency. Now, the one thing that spans the whole portfolio of cyber resiliency way have cyber rebellion see and a raise. We have some softer on the mainframe called Safeguarded Copy that creates immutable copies and has extra extra security for the management rights. You've got management control, and if you have a malware ransomware attack, you couldn't recover to these known good copies. So that's a piece of software that we sell on the mainframe on >> how much growth have you seen in that in? Because he's never reveals if you've got it resonating pervasive, right, Pervasive. So >> we've got, for example, malware and ransomware detection. Also, Inspector protect. So it's taken example. So I'm going to steal from the Cube and I'm gonna ask Dave and for you, I want a billion dollars and Dave's gonna laugh at me because he used a spectrum protect. He's gonna start laughing. But if I'm the ransomware guy, what do I do? I go after your snapshots, your replicas and your backup data sets. First, I make sure I've got those under control. And then when I tell you I'm holding you for ransom, you can't go back to a known good copy. So Ransomware goes after backup snaps and replicas first. Then it goes half your primary storage. So what we do, inspector protect, for example, is we know that at Weeki Bond and the Cube, you back up every night from 11 32 1 30 takes two hours to back you up every night. It's noon. There's tons of activity in the backup data sets. What the heck is going on? We send it out to the admin, So the admin for the Cube wicky bond takes a look and says, No server failure. So you can't be doing a lot of recovery because of a bad server. No storage failures. What the heck is going on? It could be a possible mount where ransomware attack. So that type of technology, we encrypt it, rest on all of our store to raise. We have both tape and tape and cloud air gapping. I'm gonna ask you about that. We've got both types of air gapped >> used to hate tape. Now he loves my love, right? No, I used to hate it, But now I love it because it's like the last resort, just in case. And you do air gapping when you do a WR gapping with customers, Do you kind of rotate the You know, it's like, uh, you know, the Yasser Arafat used to move every night. You sleep in a different place, right? You gonna rotate the >> weird analogy? You do >> some stuff. There's a whole strategy >> of how we outlined how you would do a tape air gap, you a cloud air gap. Of course you're replicating or snapping out to the cloud anyway, so they can't get to that. So if you have a failure, we haven't known good copy, depending on what time that is, right. And then you just recover. Cover back to that and even something simple. We have data rest, encryption. Okay. A lot of people don't use it or won't use it on storage because it's often software based, and so is permanent. Well, in our D s platform on the mainframe, we can encrypt with no performance hit on our flash system products we can encrypt with no performance it on our high end store. Wise, we have four models on the two high end stores models we could encrypt with no performance penalty. So why would you not encrypt all your debt? When there's a performance penalty, you have to sort of pick and choose. My God, I got to encrypt this valuable financial data, but, boy, I really wish it wasn't so slow with us. There is no performance it when you encrypt. So we have encryption at rest, encryption at flight malware and ran somewhere detection. We've got worm, which is important, obviously, doesn't mean I can't steal from wicked Bond Cube, but I certainly can't go change all your account numbers for all your vendors. For sake. of argument, right? So and there's obviously heavily regulated industries that still require worm technology, right? Immutable on the fine, by the way, you could always if it's wormed, you could encrypt it if you want to write. Because Worm just means it's immutable. It doesn't. It's not a different data type. It's just a mutable version of that data. >> So the cyber resiliency is interesting, and it leads me to another question I have around just are, indeed so A lot of companies in this industry do a lot of D developing next generation products. I think, you know, look a t m c when you were there, you know, this >> was a lot of there. Wasn't a ton, >> of course, are a lot of patents and stuff like that. IBM does corps are a lot of research and research facilities, brainiac scientists, I want if you could talk about how the storage division takes advantage of that, either specifically, is it relates to cyber resiliency. But generally, >> yes, so as you know, IBM has got, I think it's like 12 12 or 15 research on Lee sites that that's all they do, and everyone there is, in fact, my office had to be. Akiyama didn't labs, and there's two labs actually hear. The AMA didn't research lab and the Silicon Valley lab, which is very close about five miles away. Beautiful. Almost everything. There is research. There's a few product management guys I happen, Navid desk there every once. Well, see a sales guy or two. But essentially, they're all Richard with PhDs from the leading inverse now at Al Madden and many sites, all the divisions have their own research teams there. There's a heavy storage contingent at Al Midan as an example. Same thing in Zurich. So, for example, we just announced last week, as you know, stuff that will work with Quantum on the tape side. So you don't have to worry about because one of things, obviously, that people complain about quantum computing, whether it's us or anyone else, the quantum computing you can crack basically any encryption. Well, guess what? IBM research has developed tape that can be encrypted. So if using quantum computer, whether it be IBM or someone else's when you go with quantum computing, you can have secured data because the quantum computer can't actually cracked the encryption that we just put into that new tape that was done at IBM Research. How >> far away are we from From Quantum, actually being ableto be deployed and even minor use cases. >> Well, we've got available right now in ibm dot com for Betas. So we've got several 1000 people who have been accidents in it. And entities, we've been talking publicly in the 3 to 7 year timeframe for quantum computer crap out. Should it? Well, no, because if you do the right sort of security, you don't but the power. So if you're envisioning one of my favorite movies, I robot, right where she's doing her talking and that's that would really be quantum in all honesty. But at the same time, you know, the key thing IBM is all about ethics and all about how we do things, whether it be what we do with our diversity programs and hiring. And IBM is always, you know, at the forefront of doing and promoting ethical this and ethical. Then >> you do a customer data is huge. >> Yeah, and what we do with the customer data sets right, we do. GDP are, for example, all over the world were not required by law to do it really Only in Europe we do it everywhere. And so if you're not, if you're in California, if you happen to be in Zimbabwe or you're in Brazil, you get the same protection of GDP are even though we're not legally required to do it. And why are we doing that? Because they're always concerned about customers data, and we know they're paranoid about it. We want to make sure people feel comfortable with IBM. We do. Quantum computing will end up in that same vein. >> But you know, I don't worry about you guys. I were about the guys on the other side of the fence, the ones that I worry about, the same thing Capabilities knew that was >> on, of course. And you know, he talked about it in his speech, and he talked about action on the Cube yesterday about some of his comments on the point, and he mentioned that was based on Blockchain. What he said was Blockchain is a great technology. They've got Blockchain is no. IBM is a big believer in Blockchain. We promoted all over the place and in fact we've done all kinds of different Blockchain things we just did. One announced it last week with Australia with the Australian. I think it is with their equivalent of Wall Street. We've done some stuff with Merrick, the big shipping container thing, and it's a big consortium. That's all legal stuff that was really talking about someone using it the wrong way. And he's very specific point out that Blockchain is a great technology if used ethically, and IBM is all about how we do it. So we make sure whether be quantum computing, Blockchain, et cetera, that everything we do at IBM is about helping the end users, making sure that we're making, for example, open source. As you know. Well, the number one provider of open source technology pre read had acquisition is IBM. We submit Maur into the open community. Renounce Now are we able to make some money off of that? Sure we are, but we do it for a reason, because IBM believes as day point out in this core research. Open computing is court research, and we just join the Open Foundation last week as well. So we're really big on making sure that what we do ourselves is Ethel now We try to make sure that what happens in the hands of people who buy our technology, which we can always track, is also done ethically. And we go out of our way to join the right industry. Associations work with governments, work with whatever we need to do to help make sure that technology could really be iRobot. Anyone who thinks that's not true. If you talk to your grandparent's goto, go to the moon. What are you talking about? >> What Star Trek. It's always >> come to me. Oh, yeah, >> I mean, if you're your iPhone is basically the old community. Transport is the only thing I wish I could have the transfer. Aziz. You know, >> David has the same frame us up. I'm afraid of flying, and I I felt like two million miles on United and David. He's laughs about flowers, so I'm waiting for the transport. I know that's why anymore there's a cone over here. Go stand. Or maybe maybe with a little bit of like, I'm selling my Bitcoin. No, hang on, just hold on. There's always a comeback. Not always. There could be a comeback because Derek always enjoy it as always. Thanks for the good seeing you. All right, Back with more Veum. World 2019 The Cube live in San Francisco.
SUMMARY :
brought to you by the M Wear and its ecosystem partners. Eric, good to see you and love the shirt. Well, always have a wine shirts when I'm on the Cube I love in a long time Cuba to we might say, I'm sure he's got the record. you and pattern, neck and neck. the vault. Well, the So we created a slide based on Dave's input, and we were doing that two There were a few other analysts I'm sure you talked to and got input, but but us really were the first You guys created the storage business, you know, years and years and years ago. So that's the bulk of our business connected to Intel servers of all types that used to include, Do they So if you look at if we were a standalone company, which would include support service But if you're array and I'm sure this happens is inside of the IBM, you don't get credit for it. Part of that is the So, for example, we sell the hundreds of cloud providers who in theory compete with the IBM Cloud Division to you Get credit for that. the other guys, we'd be Stanley would be in that, you know, low $6 billion range, counting everything all in. And the names have changed. What's the current? So and we have filed blocking object just like most other guys do, Um, how much growth have you seen in that in? is we know that at Weeki Bond and the Cube, you back up every night from 11 32 the You know, it's like, uh, you know, the Yasser Arafat used to move There's a whole strategy of how we outlined how you would do a tape air gap, you a cloud air gap. So the cyber resiliency is interesting, and it leads me to another question I have around just are, Wasn't a ton, research and research facilities, brainiac scientists, I want if you could talk about we just announced last week, as you know, stuff that will work with Quantum on far away are we from From Quantum, actually being ableto be deployed and even minor But at the same time, you know, the key thing IBM is all about ethics and all about how we by law to do it really Only in Europe we do it everywhere. But you know, I don't worry about you guys. And you know, he talked about it in his speech, and he talked about action on the Cube yesterday about come to me. Transport is the only thing I wish I could have the transfer. Thanks for the good seeing you.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eric Herzog | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ed Walsh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Zimbabwe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Zurich | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Brazil | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lenovo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two labs | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Eric | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Derek | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two million miles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AMA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
3 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Wall | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Star Trek | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Merrick | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM research | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Yasser Arafat | PERSON | 0.98+ |
two | DATE | 0.98+ |
23 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
$6 billion | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Akiyama | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Al Madden | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Open Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Richard | PERSON | 0.98+ |
7 year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Weeki Bond | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
250 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Aziz | PERSON | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
Wall Street | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
first toe | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
$6.3 billion | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two high end stores | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
four models | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
about five miles | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two different pieces | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Ethel | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Day three | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Pat | PERSON | 0.95+ |
both types | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
theCUBE Insights | VMworld 2019
>> live from San Francisco, celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum, World 2019 brought to you by the M Wear and its ecosystem partners. >> Hey, welcome back, everyone. Live Cube coverage of the emerald 2019 were here in San Francisco, California Mosconi North Lobby. Two sets Our 10th year covering the emerald in our 20th year of Of of our seasons of covering Me to be enterprised Tech. I'm Jeffrey Day Volonte student Justin Warren breaking down day to Cube insights segment. Dave's Do You Do You're on Set Valley set this the meadow set because it's got the steamboat chirping birds behind us. Justin, you've been doing some interviews out on the floor as well. Checking the story's out. All the news is out. Day one was all the big corporate stuff. Today was the product technology news stew. I'll go to you first. What's the assessment on your take on the M, where obviously they're reinventing themselves? Jerry Chen, who we interviewed, said this is Act three of'em where they keep on adding more and more prostitute their core, your thoughts on what's going on. >> So the biggest whore I've seen is the discussion of Tom Zoo, which really talking those cloud native applications. And if you break down VM wear, it's like many companies that said, There's the, you know, core product of the company. It is vey sphere. It is the legacy for what we have and it's not going anywhere, and it's changing. But, you know, then there's the modernization project Pacific howto a bridge to the multi cloud world. How do I bridge Kubernetes is going to come into the sphere and do that? But then there's the application world into the thing I've been. You know, the existential threat to VM, where I've been talking about forever is if we sas if I and cloud If I and all the APS go away, the data centers disappear in Vienna, where dominant, the data center is left out in the cold. So, you know, Pivotal was driving down that that path. They've done a lot of acquisitions, so love directionally where towns who's going time will tell whether they can play in that market. This is not a developer conference. We go to plenty of developer events, so, you know, that's you know, some of the places. I see you know, and and still, you know, >> narrator conference. You're right. Exactly Right. And just I want to get your thoughts, too, because you've been blocking heavily on this topic as well. Dev Ops in general, commenting on the Cube. You know, the reality and the reality, Uh, and the reality of situation from the the announcement. That's a vapor. They're doing some demos. They're really product directions. So product directions is always with VM. Where does it? It's not something that their shameful love, that's what they do. That's what they put out. It's not bakery >> company. It's a statement, A statement of >> direction. We were talking hybrid cloud in 2012 when I asked Pet guess it was a halfway house. He blew a gasket. And now, five years later, the gestation period for hybrid was that. But the end was happy to have the data center back in the back. In the play here, your thoughts on >> Yeah. So this conference is is, I think, a refreshing return to form. So, Vienna, where is as you say, this is an operators conference in Vienna. Where is for operators? It's not Four Dev's. There was a period there where cloud was scary And it was all this cloud native stuff in Vienna where tried to appeal to this new market, I guess tried to dress up and as something that it really wasn't and it didn't pull it off and we didn't It didn't feel right. And now Veum Way has decided that Well, no, actually, this is what they and where is about. And no one could be more Veum where than VM wear. So it's returning to being its best self. And I think you >> can software. They know software >> they know. So flick. So the addition of putting predict Enzo in and having communities in there, and it's to operate the software. So it's it's going to be in there an actual run on it, and they wanna have kubernetes baked into the sphere. So that now, yeah, we'll have new a new absent. Yeah, there might be SAS eps for the people who are consuming them, but they're gonna run somewhere. And now we could run them on van. Wait. Whether it's on Silent at the edge could be in the cloud your Veum wear on eight of us. >> David David so I want to get your thoughts just don't want to jump into because, you know, I love pivotal what they've done. I've always felt as a standalone company they probably couldn't compete with Amazon to scale what's going on in the other things. But bring it back in the fold in VM, where you mentioned this a couple of our interviews yesterday, Dave, and still you illuminate to to the fact of the cloud native world coming together. It's better inside VM wear because they can package pivotal and not have to bet the ranch on the outcome in the marketplace where this highly competitive statements out there so you get the business value of Pivotal. The upside now can be managed. Do your thoughts first, then go to date >> about Pivotal. Yeah, as >> an integrated, integrated is better for the industry than trying to bet the ranch on a pier play >> right? So, John, yesterday we had a little discussion about hybrid and multi cloud and still early about there, but the conversation of past five years ago was very different from the discussion. Today, Docker had a ripple effect with Containers and Veum. Where is addressing that and it made sense for Pivotal Cut to come home, if you will. They still have the Pivotal Labs group that can work with customers going through that transformation and a number of other pieces toe put together. But you ve m where is doing a good enough job to give customers the comfort that we can move you forward to the cloud. You don't have to abandon us and especially all those people that do VM Where is they don't have to be frozen where they are >> a business value. >> Well, I think you've got to start with the transaction and provide a historical context. So this goes back to what I used to call the misfit toys. The Federation. David Golden's taking bits and pieces of of of Dragon Pearl of assets in side of E, M. C and V M wear and then creating Pivotal out of whole cloth. They need an I P O. Michael Dell maintained 70% ownership of the company and 96% voting shares floated. The stock stock didn't do well, bought it back on 50 cents on the dollar. A so what the AIPO price was and then took a of Got a Brit, brought back a $4 billion asset inside of the M wear and paid $900 million for it. So it's just the brilliant financial transaction now, having said all that, what is the business value of this? You know, when I come to these shows, I'd liketo compare what they say in the messaging and the keynotes to what practitioners are saying in the practitioners last night were saying a couple of things. First of all, they're concerned about all the salmon. A like one. Practitioners said to me, Look, if it weren't for all these acquisitions that they announced last minute, what would we be hearing about here? It would have been NSX and V san again, so there's sort of a little concerns there. Some of the practitioners I talked to were really concerned about integration. They've done a good job with Nasasira, but some of the other acquisitions that they may have taken longer to integrate and customers are concerned, and we've seen this movie before. We saw the DMC. We certainly saw the tell. We're seeing it again now, at the end where Veum where? Well, they're very good at integrating companies. Sometimes that catches up to you. The last thing I'll say is we've been pushing You just mentioned it, Justin. On Dev's not a deaf show. Pivotal gives VM where the opportunity to whether it's a different show are an event within the event to actually attract the depths. But I would say in the multi cloud world, VM wears sitting in a good position. With the exception of developers pivotal, I think it's designed to solve that problem. Just tell >> your thoughts. >> Do you think that Veum, where is, is at risk of becoming a portfolio company just like a M A. M. C. Watts? Because it certainly looks at the moment to me like we look at all the different names for things, and I just look at the brand architecture of stuff. There are too many brands. There are too many product names, it's too confusing, and there's gonna have to be a culottes some point just to make it understandable for customers. Otherwise, we're just gonna end up with this endless sprawl, and we saw what the damage that did it. At present, I am saying >> it's a great point and Joseph Joe to cheese used to say that overlap is better than gaps, and I and I agree with him to appoint, you know better until it's not. And then Michael Dell came in and Bar came and said, Look, if we're gonna compete with Amazon's cost structure, we have to clean this mess up and that's what they've been doing it a lot of hard work on that. And so, yeah, they do risk that. I think if they don't do that integration, it's hard to do that. Integration, as you know, it takes time. Um, and so I have Right now. All looks good, right? Right down the middle. As you say, John, are >> multi cloud. Big topic gestation period is going to take five years to seven years. When the reality multi cloud a debate on Twitter last night, someone saying, I'm doing multi cloud today. I mean, we had Gelsinger's layout, the definition of multi cloud. >> Well, he laid out his definition definition. Everyone likes to define its. It's funny how, and we mentioned this is a stew and I earlier on the other set, cloud were still arguing about what cloud means exit always at multi cloud, which kind of multi cloud is a hybrid bowl over. And then you compare that to EJ computing, which computing was always going on. And then someone just came along and gave it a name and everyone just went, huh? OK, and go on with their lives. And so why is cloud so different and difficult for people to agree on what the thing is? >> There's a lot of money being made and lost, That's why >> right day the thing I've said is for multi cloud to be a real thing, it needs to be more valuable to a customer than the sum of its pieces on. And, you know, we know we're gonna be an Amazon reinvent later this year we will be talking, you know? Well, they will not be talking multi cloud. We might be talking about it, but >> they'll be hinting to hybrid cloud may or may not say >> that, you know, hybrid is okay in their world with outpost and everything they're doing in there partnering with VM wear. But you know, the point I've been looking at here is you know, management of multi vendor was atrocious. And, you know, why do we think we're going to any better. David, who hired me nine years ago. It was like I could spend my entire career saying, Management stinks and security needs to be, >> you know, So I want to share lawyers definition. They published in Wicked Bon on Multiply Multi Cloud Hybrid Cloudy, Putting together True Hybrid Cloud Multiply Any application application service can run on any node of the hybrid cloud without rewriting, re compiling or retesting. True hybrid cloud architectures have a consistent set of hardware. Software service is a P I is with integrated network security data and control planes that are native to and display the characteristics of public cloud infrastructure is a service. These attributes could be identically resident on other hybrid nodes independent of location, for example, including on public clouds on Prem or at the edge. That ain't happening. It's just not unless you have considered outposts cloud a customer azure stack. Okay, and you're gonna have collections of those. So that vision that he laid out, I just I think it's gonna >> be David. It's interesting because, you know, David and I have some good debates on this. I said, Tell me a company that has been better at than VM wear about taking a stack and letting it live on multiple hardware's. You know, I've got some of those cars are at a big piece last weekend talking about, you know, when we had to check the bios of everything and when blade Service rolled out getting Veum whereto work 15 years ago was really tough. Getting Veum were to work today, but the >> problem is you're gonna have outposts. You're gonna have project dimensions installed. You're gonna have azure stacks installed. You're gonna have roll your own out there. And so yeah, VM where is gonna work on all >> those? And it's not gonna be a static situation because, you know, when I talk to customers and if they're using V M where cloud on AWS, it's not a lift and shift and leave it there, Gonna modernize their things that could start using service is from the public cloud and they might migrate some of these off of the VM where environment, which I think, is the thing that I am talking to customers and hearing about that It's, you know, none of these situations are Oh, I just put it there and it's gonna live there for years. It's constantly moving and changing, and that is a major threat to VM wears multi clouds, >> Traffic pushes. Is it technically feasible without just insanely high degrees of homogeneity? That's that's the question. >> I I don't think it is and or not. I don't think it's a reasonable thing to expect anyway, because any enterprise you have any M and a activity, and all of a sudden you've got more than one that's always been true, and it will always be true. So if someone else makes a different choice and you buy them, then we'll have both. >> So maybe that's not a fair definition, but that's kind of what what? One could infer that. I think the industry is implying that that is hybrid multi club because that's the nirvana that everybody wants. >> Yeah, the only situation I can see where that could maybe come true would be in something like communities where you're running things on as an abstraction on top off everything else, and that that is a common abstraction that everyone agrees on and builds upon. But we're already seeing how that works out in real life. If >> I'm >> using and Google Antos. I can't easily move it to P. K s or open shift. There's English Kubernetes, as Joe Beta says, is not a magic layer, and everybody builds. On top of >> it, is it? Turns out it's actually not that easy. >> Well, and plus people are taken open source code, and then they're forking it and it building their own proprietary systems and saying, Hey, here's our greatest thing. >> Well, the to the to the credit of CNC, if Kubernetes. Does have a kind of standardized, agreed to get away away from that particular issue. So that's where it stands a better chance and say unfortunately, open stack. So because we saw a bit of that change of way, want to go this way? And we want to go that way. So there's a lot of seeing and zagging, at least with communities. You have a kind of common framework. But even just the implementation of that writing it, >> I love Cooper. I think I've been a big fan of committed from Day one. I think it's a great industry initiative. Having it the way it's rolling out is looking very good. I like it a lot. The comments that we heard on the Cube of Support. Some of my things that I'm looking at is for C N C s Q. Khan Come coop con Coming up is what happened with Kay, native and SDO because that's what I get to see the battleground for above Goober Netease. You see, that's what differentiates again. That's where that the vendors are gonna start to differentiate who they are. So I think carbonates. It could be a great thing. And I think what I learned here was virtualization underneath Kubernetes. It doesn't matter if you want to run a lot. Of'em Furat scale No big deal run Cooper's on top. You want to run in that bare metal? God bless you, >> Go for it. I think this use cases for both. >> That's why I particularly like Tenzer is because for those customers who wanna have a bit of this, cupidity is I don't want to run it myself. It's too hard. But if I trust Vienna where to be able to run that in to upgrade it and give me all of the goodness about operating it in the same way that I do the end where again we're in and I'll show. So now I can have stuff I already know in love, and I can answer incriminating on top of it. >> All right, But who's gonna mess up Multi clouds do. Who's the vendor? I'm not >> even saying it s so you can't mess up something that >> who's gonna think vision, this vision of multi cloud that the entire industry is putting forth who's gonna throw a monkey? The rich? Which vendor? Well, screw it. So >> you know, licensing usually can cause issues. You know, our friend Corey Crane with a nice article about Microsoft's licensing changes there. You know, there are >> lots of Amazon's plays. Oh, yeah. Okay. Amazon is gonna make it. >> A multi clock is not in the mob, >> but yet how could you do multi cloud without Amazon? >> They play with >> control. My the chessboard on my line has been Amazon is in every multi cloud because if you've got multiple clouds, there's a much greater than likely chance >> I haven't been. You know, my feeling is in looking at the history of how multi vendor of all from the I T industry from proprietary network operating systems, many computers toe open systems, D c P I P Web, etcetera. What's going on now is very interesting, and I think the sea so ce of the canary in the coal mine, not Cee Io's because they like multi vendor. They want multiple clouds. They're comfortable that they got staff for that si sos have pressure, security. They're the canary in the coal mine and all the seasons lights, while two are all saying multi clouds b s because they're building stacks internally and they want to create their own technology for security reasons and then build a P eyes and make a P. I's the supplier relationship and saying, Hey, supplier, if you want to work with me, me support my stack I think that is an interesting indication. What that means is that the entire multi cloud thing means we're pick one clown build on, have a backup. We'll deal with multiple clouds if there's workloads in there but primary one cloud, we'll be there. And I think that's gonna be the model. Yes, still be multiple clouds and you got azure and get office 3 65 That's technically multi cloud, >> but I want to make a point. And when pats on we joke about The cul de sac is hybrid cloud a cul de sac, and you've been very respectful and basically saying Yap had okay, But But But you were right, Really. What's hybrid would show me a hybrid cloud. It's taken all this time to gestate you where you see Federated Applications. It's happening. You have on prim workloads, and you have a company that has public cloud workloads. But they're not. Hybrid is >> the region. Some we'll talk about it, even multi. It is an application per cloud or a couple of clouds that you do it, but it's right. Did he follow the sun thing? That we might get there 15 years ago? Is >> no. You're gonna have to insist that this >> data moving around, consistent >> security, governance and all the organizational edicts across all those platforms >> the one place, like all week for that eventually and this is a long way off would be if you go with Serverless where it's all functions and now it's about service composition and I don't care where it lives. I'm just consuming a service because I have some data that I want to go on process and Google happens to have the best machine learning that I need to do it on that data. Also use that service. And then when I actually want to run the workload and host it somewhere else, I drop it into a CD in with an application that happens to run in AWS. >> Guys wrapping up day to buy It's just gonna ask, What is that animal? It must be an influence because hasn't said a word. >> Thistles. The famous blue cow She travels everywhere with me, >> has an INSTAGRAM account. >> She used to have an instagram. She now she doesn't. She just uses my Twitter account just in time to time. >> I learned a lot about you right now. Thanks for sharing. Great to have you. Great as always, Great commentary. Thanks for coming with Bay three tomorrow. Tomorrow. I want to dig into what's in this for Del Technologies. What's the play there when I unpacked, that is tomorrow on day three million. If there's no multi cloud and there's a big tam out there, what's in it for Michael Dell and BM where it's Crown Jewel as the main ingredient guys, thanks for coming stupid in Manchester words, David Want them? John, Thanks for watching day, too. Inside coverage here are wrap up. Thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
brought to you by the M Wear and its ecosystem partners. I'll go to you first. You know, the existential threat to VM, where I've been talking about forever is if we sas if I Dev Ops in general, commenting on the Cube. It's a statement, A statement of But the end was happy to have the data center back in the back. And I think you They know software Whether it's on Silent at the edge could be in the cloud your Veum wear But bring it back in the fold in VM, Yeah, as is they don't have to be frozen where they are With the exception of developers pivotal, I think it's designed to solve that problem. Because it certainly looks at the moment to me like we look at all the different names for things, Integration, as you know, it takes time. When the reality multi cloud a debate on Twitter last night, someone saying, I'm doing multi cloud today. And then you compare that to EJ computing, which computing was always going on. right day the thing I've said is for multi cloud to be a real thing, But you know, the point I've been looking at here is you know, It's just not unless you have considered outposts cloud It's interesting because, you know, David and I have some good debates on this. And so yeah, VM where is gonna work on all and hearing about that It's, you know, none of these situations are Oh, That's that's the question. I don't think it's a reasonable thing to expect anyway, because any enterprise you have any I think the industry is implying that that is hybrid multi club because that's the nirvana that everybody Yeah, the only situation I can see where that could maybe come true would be in something like communities where you're I can't easily move it to P. K s or open shift. Turns out it's actually not that easy. Well, and plus people are taken open source code, and then they're forking it and it building their Well, the to the to the credit of CNC, if Kubernetes. And I think what I learned here was virtualization I think this use cases for both. of the goodness about operating it in the same way that I do the end where again we're in and I'll show. Who's the vendor? So you know, licensing usually can cause issues. lots of Amazon's plays. My the chessboard on my line has been Amazon is in every I's the supplier relationship and saying, Hey, supplier, if you want to work with me, It's taken all this time to gestate you where you see Federated Applications. a couple of clouds that you do it, but it's right. the one place, like all week for that eventually and this is a long way off would be if you go with It must be an influence because hasn't said a word. The famous blue cow She travels everywhere with me, She just uses my Twitter account just in time to time. I learned a lot about you right now.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vienna | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Justin Warren | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jerry Chen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2012 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Justin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
50 cents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Corey Crane | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$4 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
David Golden | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
$900 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
Joe Beta | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nasasira | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
NSX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cooper | PERSON | 0.99+ |
DMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tenzer | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Del Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Veum | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
20th year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
seven years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10th year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
five years later | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Joseph Joe | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
M wear | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last night | DATE | 0.98+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.98+ |
nine years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Day one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Vienna | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Manchester | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
15 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
Pivotal Labs | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Veum Way | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
SDO | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.97+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
Q. Khan | PERSON | 0.96+ |
V san | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
David David | PERSON | 0.95+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ | |
Jeffrey Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.95+ |
Pivotal | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
M A. M. C. Watts | PERSON | 0.94+ |
last weekend | DATE | 0.93+ |
Bay three | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
past five years ago | DATE | 0.93+ |
96% voting shares | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Docker | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Enzo | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
3 65 | OTHER | 0.91+ |
later this year | DATE | 0.91+ |
Survey Shows Containers Won't Kill VMware...Yet
>> from the Silicon Angle Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts. It's the cue now Here's your host Day Volonte >> Hybrid. Welcome to this special edition of Cube Insights. This is the Cubes 10th year at VM World and leading up >> to V M World. >> We wanted to provide some data in some analysis to you all, and we're working with our partners at E. T. R Enterprise Technology Research. We first introduced you to them when IBM consummated the Red Hat acquisition and they provided some data. E T. R is affirmed. That does really detailed and fast ongoing data. They have, ah, large panel of end customers that they talked to about spending intentions, covering virtually every company in the Enterprise. It's it's great stuff. We reached out to them and came up with a number of questions that we wanted to address around Of'em World and VM where, so let me just start by showing you the questions that we ask them to help us with. And we did essentially what I call drill down survey. So we took their existing data sets. They just did a survey. They completed one in July on spending intentions for the second half of the year combined that, with all the time Siri's data that they had. So these are the questions that really are top of mind for I t decision makers in our community. First of all, what's the appetite for VM? We're spending the second half of 2019. We'll share some data on that. There's a second point is there's narrative out there that that containers are going to kill the M. Where, well, is that true? What is the day to say? How about Multi Cloud? It's the hot topic who was best positioned in multi cloud not only within the VM, where ecosystem but overall, obviously, the M, where has designs on multi cloud and is considered an early potential leader? How about NSX when VM wear but nice era? It changed the game on networking, changed their relationship with Cisco. How is Ennis Ex impacting spending on Cisco? Particularly, obviously a networking. The fifth question that we wanted to address is how is public cloud affecting the M where spend we know public cloud is growing faster than on Prem. What's the impact on the M wear? And then finally it was announced in the press that VM wear was going to acquire Pivotal. Why would that be all right? So let's get into it. The first thing that I want to address is the first question in spending intention. So this slide really shows the results of the second half survey. It's 600 >> and >> 93 respondents representing almost $300 billion in spending power. And so it's actually they were asked what you're spending intention intentions For the second half of 2019 you could see 41% of the respondents said they're going to spend Maur, and only 7% said they're gonna spend less. About 45% said >> they gonna hold firm >> small number 5%. So we're gonna add new and only a tiny infant testable. 2% said they were gonna replace the anywhere, so that's pretty good for an incumbent. And essentially it Sze holding serve and maybe doing a little bit. But even better than holding serve on. So So we saw. That is very positive. The next question that we want to address is the narrative of containers will kill the M, where we asked Pat Gelsinger about that on the Cube years ago, he said, Hey, we're gonna use this as a tail wind. We're gonna embrace containers. So the bottom line is there's very little evidence that containers are hurting the M where let alone killing the end. Where this is a portion of the survey, about 461 respondents on you can see that you know, the big big blip early on back in July 27. Dean. Big uptick in spending, and since then it's been relatively stable. But the important point here is the number of shared accounts that we went to essentially container customers and asked them about their VM wear. Spend. I say we eat. TR did. This is what they do on an ongoing basis, and you could see the number of shared accounts back in 17 was only eight. But as you go to the right hand side, the more recent surveys you're talking about 361 shared accounts of the data sample got much bigger. No evidence that the M where is being negatively impacted by containers kind of affirming the assertion of Pat Gelsinger. Let's talk about multi club. I have said that multi cloud to date has largely been a symptom of multi vendor It's cos acquiring Cloud Technologies for specific workloads. Its shadow i t. It's pockets of cloud activity versus a coherent strategy to manage across multiple clouds. True Hybrid Cloud. We're in the early stages, so the data here, in our view, shows that multi cloud really is jump ball. Um, Interestingly, however, Microsoft and Google is showing momentum. So with this slide shows is the cloud spending intentions. And we picked, you know, the top five players there, that air sort of angling around multi cloud ghoul with Antos. Clearly Microsoft coming from its large software estate of V M. Where, of course, which many believer are early favorite Red Hat with the IBM acquisition and Cisco. So what's interesting here is Google and Microsoft clearly have a lot of momentum kind of mind share in the market place, and not a lot of hard core spending going on and multi cloud. Everybody has multi clouds, but in terms of spending on specific products, does like Antos, for instance, from Google, designed for to support multi cloud. That's where in the early stages there, but you can see the sentiment that buyers have around multi cloud Google and Microsoft showing momentum. Interestingly, VM wear Red Hat and Cisco kind of, you know, bunched up as the big enterprise player. So that's why we call a jump. Oh, we see it is wide open. You know, Cisco might surprise some people, but it really doesn't surprise us. Cisco's coming at multi cloud from a position of networking strength of each of these players you know has their strength. Google with Antos Microsoft from its software state Veum, where clearly as the data center operating system red hat with open shift Now with IBM service is capability. And, of course, Sisko coming at it from networking and security. So so hard to conclude you know who wins out of this data but wanted to share that with you just in terms of what customers are thinking around multi cloud. Okay, big conversation in the community around networking generally specifically NSX. When VM wear beats us, go to the punch and acquired nice era. It stated that we want to do to networking in storage what we did for servers. Well, what did the end? Where do the servers they really co opted the marketplace changed the game and really became, you know, these central point of server management, and that's what they want to do with with networking. VM where is trying to de position Cisco as, ah, hardware vendor, Cisco is responding with its own software defined capabilities and is an interesting battle going on. What is the data show? This shows that network networking spend intentions for Cisco, the Red Line and the M Wear the Blue Line. You can see VM where NSX is sort of bouncing around but has very high mindshare. Where Cisco it's showing a holding firm, but a very gradual decline, I've said many times. Cisco very impressive company, 60 plus percent market share. They've held that for a long, long time, despite some of the successes that you've seen you by the likes of a risk juniper and F five et cetera. Cisco has held its dominant share, but nonetheless, it's clear that NSX is impacting Cisco's dominance. Certainly from a marketing standpoint, and you're seeing also, from a spending standpoint that NSX is really challenging Cisco. It'll be very interesting to see how that plays out over time. Okay, next question was okay. What about cloud. How is that affecting VM? Where we see the cloud numbers, we see the growth. What does that mean for VM wear? And you can see here this'll cloud customers of'em were spend about 718 respondents, and you can see the number of shared accounts in the sample is substantial. 3 94 3 79 for 69. It obviously changes by by the frequency that e t. R does these surveys and they do, you know, several times a year, as you can see, but, you know, large sample of shared accounts. And there's no question that Cloud customers continue to shift Maur. They're spending to the public cloud and potentially at the expense of the end, where you can see the gradual decline here and somewhat precipitous decline. VM. We're still very strong. Stock price is doing great, but there's a little question in our mind that long term VM where, despite cleaning up its cloud strategy with first the AWS Partnership and also now partnerships with Google and Microsoft, and of course, I'd be Emma's Well, they were first, but having public cloud partners nonetheless, we see that over time there's a riel tension there. That on Prem is not going to grab the market, share that growth that the cloud has. And that is a challenge for VM, where that we continue to watch finally pivotal. Why would a V M where acquire? Pivotal? Well, first of all, this is why Pivotal is not work. It doesn't have the momentum that it wants in the marketplace. You can see it's it's pretty steep decline over the last couple of years. On Dhe, it's precipitous. Ah, drop in stock price. Essentially, Del and the governance structure of Del Technologies, which course owns VM, wear a large portion of pivotal saying, Look, let's let's roll this back in. Let's give the stock price of boost. The stock went up 70 plus percent of the day that thou went down 800 points. And so this is why the M, where would buy Pivotal? You know, it's a forcing function, we believe, from from Del. It also makes sense, del in its family del technologies that has these software assets VM where is the mother ship of the Del software operation? So why not folded in personally? I think they should do it with some other software assets as well. Secureworks del Bumi, Arcee. All candidates to roll in potentially overtime to Vienna where at least portions of it, anyway. Okay, so let's summarize. What are the key takeaways? What's the appetite for Veum warrants in the second half of 2019? Pretty solid, we'd say. Well, containers kill VM where there's no evidence, certainly in the theater. But there are threats. Think about sass. How many SAS providers are actually running? VM where so, as SAS continues to grow in prominence of that is a potential blind spot for VM. Where that we're watching Who's best position in multi cloud? It's wide open. Microsoft look strong. Google clearly has some momentum. Cisco maybe surprises many, but I think it's not gonna be a winner. Take all we feel is, though there's a lot of opportunities, but number one is going to make the most money. And so it's a very important space that we're watching. House NSX impacting Cisco Spend. It's a battle, but NSX is clearly negatively pressuring, pressuring Cisco. How about Public Cloud? How is that affecting the M we're spend? We think it's slowly eating away at on print on Prem including the end, where I want to share with you a quote from one of the customers that E. T. R talked to its ahead of, ah, retail consumer organisation in North America. A long time I t practitioner says Veum wears everywhere that I've ever been. I've been a customer. Longtime VM were customer hair. She means it's the standard, but it's interesting situation to see what's their next step. How do they keep themselves relevant? I think they're always going to be a need for Veum where, especially because the ability to have the privacy of an extended network is key. However, with the cloud based environment and encrypted data, it's gonna be interesting to see how that all plays out how Veum wear deals with that approach. I think their next strategic steps are going to be crucial. I think that VM where has to be thinking long term. Okay, what do we do about Cloud? Remember VM, where early on tried to get into cloud and with its own public cloud option, became the cloud air. It failed. They got rid of it, cleaned up their cloud strategy. But why did VM where originally want to get into that business because they know that's world of growth is so yes, hybrid and multi cloud gives VM wear a lot of runway. The partnership with Amazon has a lot of momentum. I didn't share that data, but it's very clear that AWS uh Veum, where on AWS has strong momentum. And so that's certainly what the e t. Our data shows nonetheless, long term, you gotta ask what strategic moves will Michael Dell make to secure their position in the public cloud? Okay, lastly, whywould whywould vm will require pivotal. That's a duh. Okay, we gonna stated why So So that's the deal, thanks to our friends at E T. R. Really appreciate them sharing the data enterprise technology research If you wanted this, there's so many cuts on the data, it's it's unbelievable. You can cut it by large companies, small company industry applications and every company on the planet. You can compare companies together. It's really a powerful set of data, but also access tools that they have developed very, very nice, really modern version of survey panels. And so follow up with us. Follow up with them if you want more information and watch us at VM World will be covering these and many other issues that are tent year at VM World. All the key execs are gonna be on practitioners, customers, partners on, of course, analysts and the broader ecosystem technologists and John Ferrier stew Minuteman myself on the entire Cube team will be there to celebrate. So check it out, cube dot net and we'll see you next week. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
It's the cue This is the Cubes 10th What is the day to say? half of 2019 you could see 41% of the respondents said they're going to spend the end, where I want to share with you a quote from one of the customers that E.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NSX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July 27 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Ferrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Dell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July | DATE | 0.99+ |
first question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
600 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
41% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
fifth question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
800 points | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second half | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
69 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
second point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
60 plus percent | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Siri | TITLE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vienna | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VM World | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
SAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
E T. R | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
about 718 respondents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Sisko | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
2% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Pivotal | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
17 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
5% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
almost $300 billion | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Red Line | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
70 plus percent | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
five players | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about 461 respondents | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Silicon Angle Media Office | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
E. T. R Enterprise Technology Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
7% | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
About 45% | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Veum | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
VM | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Del | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
second half of 2019 | DATE | 0.94+ |
Cubes | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
10th year | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
E T. R. | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
John Barker, Versatile | CUBEConversation, August 2019
>> from the Silicon Angle Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts. It's the cue now Here's your host Day Volonte. >> Hi, buddy. Welcome to the Special Cube conversation. My name is David Dante, and this is our series on partners. How partners and the Channel is adding value to help customers create business capabilities in this digital world. I'm here with John Barker, and he is the co founder and CEO of a company called Versatile Local New England partner of H P Ease. This is sponsored by HP and versatile John. Welcome to the Cube. Thanks for coming >> on. Well, thanks, David. Appreciate you having me here today. >> So tell us more about versatile. You've been business for a couple of decades. Plus, you have, ah, deep background. Tell us about versatile and your background. >> Your, uh, be happy to do that versa was found in 25 years ago. Said 25th anniversary and I probably would be lying if I didn't tell you. I probably would've been out of this business 25 years later, but it's a great business. It was fun about my partner and I, Kevin Meaney, like a lot of those stories have started on a picnic bench in a basement. Actually, so we've grown the company over the years. I think one of the things that's important, I have something important to our customers always had a great basin infrastructure. We've always had a great deal of engineering support from our company. From a company perspective, we feel like it was 25 years ago today. Making sure you've got a complete infrastructure in place for our customers is very important that you can layer on top of those applications that those customs need to run their business. >> Well, you've seen the waves. I mean, we kind of started in the business around the same time, and we sort of we watched that PC era when everything was PC centric. It was all about personal productivity. And we saw the Internet wave. And obviously, now you know, the cloud has been this huge disrupter. And now we've got this digital wave. What are the big trends that you're seeing in the marketplace with your customer? >> Well, clearly, you know, Cloud is not new in anywhere. It has certainly been here for several years now, but in a lot of cases, they're they're they're certainly companies were born in the clown who have gone there 100% right out of the gate. But in a lot of cases are more traditional business. A lot of our customers are taking steps to get there or to build further down there, take advantage of what can be some certainly cost saving opportunities, some convenience aspects associated with the cloud. But I think from a customer's perspective, there's a lot of new technology out there, and not that it wasn't true 10 years ago. But there's so much to understand and understand what makes the most sense for my firm. Might my operation. Can I securely move to the club, right? Can I can I adequately support all of my customers? And I think that's really where a lot of customers are at. They're really looking for guidance. They're trying to understand what all the choices are. How do I move there and who can help me get there? >> Yeah, and the pendulum swings. I mean, after the you know the dot com bust, everybody was focused on cutting costs. You know, the post wide to K of situation. It feels like now people are trying to figure out. How do I get competitive advantage? They C i t. And data a differentiator, and they don't want to get disrupted. They don't want to get uber rise. That's kind of the bromide. Presumably, you see that as well. How our customers looking at that cloud, both public cloud and hybrid cloud as a differentiator. Are they looking at it to cut costs? Are they looking at it, too? Support new APS and be more agile. What are you saying? >> I think it's a lot of those things, you know, I think throughout our history it was all about putting that kind of base infrastructure together and storing a lot of data in a lot of places, making sure it's secure to have a have a proper disaster recovery plan in place. There wasn't a whole lot of thought back then. What is all this data we're storing and how do we take advantage of it? That clearly is changing, right. So with the advent of analytics, we happen to a lot of work in the health care space, which really there's a treasure trove of data out there to kind of help in that space. I think It's from a health care perspective. Technology will be the savior. Despite the fact that I think most doctors certainly conditions that you would talk to you today, almost look at this a burden and that needs to change needs to move forward. >> Well, health care is a real challenge. I mean, obviously you have, you know, hippa considerations. You've got all its highly regulated industry. As you point out, docks have never really embraced technology in a big way. But now you've got you got machine to machine intelligence. You got all kinds of embedded stuff and medical devices, and I think doctors are realizing that while machines can actually help us make better diagnoses, and it's an industry that's ripe for disruption, it really hasn't been heavily disrupted yet. But it's coming, isn't it? >> Definitely is coming on Dhe and again, she only at the hospital level. I think that they're a little bit ahead of the game in terms of how they manage their resource. Is the data the applications down the clinician level? You know much like yourself. I'm sure if you had to visit it, I had an issue related to some kind of elements or injury. A lot of it's not going to hospitals anymore. We're going to clinics. Minute clinics were going to see our doctors and a lot of cases. Those facilities haven't necessarily benefited by technology refreshes over over the last several years. And so they're really right to come into the kind of the 21st century here, along with things like Tele Medicine. So you talk about from a physician standpoint who struggled with just any HR application, which continues to be somewhat of a burden for a lot of folks. Now they've got compliancy issues they need to worry about. They've got to be offering new service is to their customers into their patients like telemedicine creates. Even Maur issues on the back end. From a data perspective, storage perspective, compliance, accessibility and ease of use don't necessarily go together, right? Tough balance, right? And so I think that, you know, from an enforcement perspective, it's only really starting to start in the health care space where is maybe the commercial? Certainly the financial markets have had no choice over the last 10 to 12 years to really hard down their facilities, their applications and their access to data. This is a whole new challenge for the health care space to tackle here. Going forward. >> So versatile are experts at at infrastructure and architecture and architectures obviously changed a lot over the past 25 years, right? Usedto have a nap. And you, you'd put down infrastructure might have been, you know, Unix or a V M s or whatever it was. You build a hardened system around that security and boom. There was your your stovepipe. It worked. It was rock solid. How are architectures, you know, changing today? How would you describe that today? Today's architecture? >> Well, way we do a lot of work with Hewlett Packard Enterprise. We've been a platinum partner. There's for close to 20 years. And so we certainly gotten very engaged with them on their product sets around how they could manage data and certainly in the storage space around their intelligence data platform, which makes ah great deal of sense for us for our customers. We do several things in terms of how we manage data. We also do private cloud hosting for medical applications use. You know as well as we obviously put together solutions for our customers to be in the club, and so making sure that we're securing those those platforms in >> putting the proper >> infrastructure in place from storage perspective from a compute perspective than honesty from a network accessibility perspective is really, really quite important. I think in a lot of cases, both commercial and in the healthcare space especially there are so many new technologies that can saved customers money and provide better security over what they may have been doing in the past and sometimes in health care is not alone. Some of those changes are taking longer than they probably should. And that kind of the promise of what technique you can do to get to deliver to those verticals is here. It just takes a great deal of time to some degree to sit down on. The customers have to understand what your options are. What makes the most sense get them comfortable, obviously that the decisions they make the date is gonna be available, it's gonna be secure. It's gonna be easily accessible. >> So you guys come in with a holistic whole house view, obviously, so you're trying to help a customer achieve an outcome. So my question is what are you looking for? From, Ah, storage system partner. What? What's the ideal storage infrastructure? What do you need from storage? >> Sure. I mean, really, I think Intelligent analytics, which is really obviously something that Hewlett Packard enterprise has been, has really come on strong with especially were initially engaged with that animal product line. Which is to say that the machine itself is starting to take care of a lot of the things you would expect for your I t. Folks to have tea, either worry about or manage on. I think, part of the problem for all our customers. There's so many data points now. We talked a little bit earlier about the fact that the coyote is everywhere, whether it's commercial or in health care. You've got all sorts of devices. Now they're on the network that are providing some level of data back somewhere. How do you manage all that? And I think with info site tools from from HP Enterprise in the storage side, you're starting to get some analysts that they're taking it a much more proactive look at what the infrastructure is doing. Potential issues where you can make intelligent changes to improve performance obviously keep things secure. Those kinds of technologies really are gonna be the I think that a bit of the hope for if you will, whether it's health care, commercial, the amount of one I t cost I t personnel, they're very expensive. Obviously those resource is. And so if you could get intelligent deployments of solution, she's like that, then it can kind of take a huge bird. Enough of the I T department. They could go about working on project worked to a to a man to a woman. All the customers that we work with always feel like they're spending too much time kind of managing their infrastructure on. I do think that we're finally getting to the point where we've got tools that can help us really do that and reduce the amount of effort and somewhat costs that goes into that. ONDA also allow those resource is to start to work in the more strategic projects for the company's right. You know where the activity should be spent trying to either improve patient care and the health care side improved profitability in the commercial space. This is really you know, this is groundbreaking kind of tools that we just haven't seen in this industry. >> Yeah, this is key. I mean, 10 years ago, people were afraid a lot of this automation, I often joke, but it's really not a joke. If your expertise is managing lungs, you probably want to rethink your career. And so but But again, 10 years ago, people were afraid that that the automation was gonna take their jobs. We think today they realized, Wow, this train of digital transformation is left the station, and they want to shift their activities from things that air, not adding value to the business to your point, things that are more strategic. So from an infrastructure standpoint, how are you helping customers? You achieve those outcomes? >> I think from our perspective, we take a very consultative approach, right? And often times I think sometimes you can't see the forest through the trees. And a lot of these organizations, right? The too busy in their day to day jobs, trying to manage the day to day efforts to actually take a strategic view of you know what I got here? How do I improve all this? What kinds of technology should I really be? looking at, I think it's almost impossible, right? You know, we had a lot of very high end engineers who a lot of cases, wouldn't be comfortable going to a small or medium business to spend their career there because it would be that only set of infrastructure they would set up and then manage right. It becomes boring for those guys. A lot of cases, a lot of the ways that we've been able to retain our talents because we're looking at noon challenges every day. New companies with new challenges for for, for their corporations, for their health care organizations to kind of understand one of the issues. How do we come up with some solutions? How to implement a phased approach to get them where they need to be? >> You're talking really about your partnership with HP Previously, HP What is it about that partnership that is unique? How do you guys differentiate in the marketplace on why HP? >> Well, I think for us it was an easy decision. You know, HP Enterprise has always been very partner friendly, which is important. We've worked together for about 20 years on dhe, certainly from a technology perspective and I think for our customers there's a bit of leapfrogging that goes all of all of these vendors, right? So to some degree of somebody might have the best d'oh gizmo for this year, and someone's gonna have something six months later. But there's consistency there. The strategic kind of view of of how they see the world unraveling and how we how we support I t going forward is really, I think, a notch above some of their competitors. I think hybrid is very important. Everybody you know, I mentioned early there, some certainly some companies that make sense that could really almost go completely club. But in most cases, it's just not possible several several certainly of our customer base. That is not gonna be comfortable ever to some degree putting everything in the cloud, but the ability to take advantage of the cloud and keep their their some of their I p, if you will locally to them make some sense. And so I think, you know, for for hybrid cloud in hybrid storage and compute HPD really got advance HB Well, >> in a lot of that to John, I think, is bringing the cloud operating model to your data wherever it exists, especially in health care. People aren't just gonna throw all the healthcare data into the cloud. I mean, there's so many issues they're not, not the least of which is. There's a lot of data on Prem that you just don't want to move into the clouds. Too expensive is too time consuming. So then to me and I look youto comment on this, a lot of that is around the simplicity of managing that infrastructure and three part kind of years ago said a gold standard on simplicity. And now Nimble comes in with a lot of intelligent automation. Your thoughts on being able to bring that cloud model to on Prem or in a hybrid situation, Is that a sort of valid way to think about? >> Oh, absolutely, I think it is. And I think again I go back to health care a little bit. But every 18 months there's storage requirements double on top of that because of compliancy issues, they have to hang on to the data indefinitely. I mean, that's gotta be a frightening aspect for any storage manager who's trying to manage Ah health care organization, a large health care organization. I need to hang on absolutely everything. Email all my files. It's not 10 years, 15 years, it's indefinitely. So that's a a major, a major undertaking in terms of Hattaway. Manage all that, right? So So H P certainly got an array of ways. Thio help with that, whether it's all flash right for the applications that require that kind of speed, this multi multi layers of storage of deployment, backup solutions, right and D r options that obviously a lot to take advantage of cloud where it makes a lot of sense. So there's a multitude of things that they need to think about on. I do believe HP is addressing those quite well. >> How are you changing the way in which you're hiring people today versus you know of 10 15 years ago? What's the skill set profile today? >> It really has changed and, you know, as we talked about earlier, we've been in business for 25 years, and and I think our ability to stay in business for that long has really been our ability to adapt and change on your right. You are hiring practices and who we hire is very different than it was maybe even five years ago. Where I've got to get cloud level architects involved. Expensive but very worthwhile resource is to be able to help customers with all of this. I do think what we get to deliver to our customers, the fact that we've got a multitude hundreds and hundreds of customers and experiences that go along with that that we could bring to the table it just couldn't possibly do in their own. It's quite impossible mission in the largest of the largest organizations. You're not going to expose the kinds of challenges in putting together kinds of solutions that gonna solve customers problems without doing that. So it's been quite a different higher than it has been in the past. >> My last question for you. Think of a healthcare use case or any any customer. So they're struggling. They've got, you know, everybody's got budget constraints. The market's moving super fast. You got this cloud thing coming, Adam The edge I ot you know, machine intelligence A. I a same time they they've got an existing business to runner and 80% of their time, and their investment is on keeping the lights on. We hear that all the time. What's your advice to the customer? I'm sure this is a common story. They want to go from point A to point B transformed their business. They don't want to go broke doing it. They might not have. The resource is so what do you D'oh, How would you advise them? >> Well, look, I think and we struggle like a lot of use. A lot of partners in this world in this country, right? Even in this region. And so trying to differentiate yourself. And we like to think that we're better than everybody else and so does the other two or 3000. Probably surrounded here in the 50 mile radius is really do need to find a trusted advisor that can help you through that. I think one of the places that we start there are there's opportunity to get some fairly immediate return on investment. I think that's important because to your point there were challenges, their their budget constraints. How am I gonna do all that? That those two things kind of go in two different directions. But there are many of our customers, really, Whether it's in health care and even the commercial side who may be doing some old things, some old I t. Things that could be replaced, including the cloud in terms of how they may be. They may be using an old disaster recovery of method, right that you're paying a lot of money for lease lines. It's really kind of a cold site, you know. They might go there once a year to try to see if they can recreate all their applications and get the thing up and running. There's clearly a cloud opportunity in there to save them. >> A lot of money >> reinvest that. Maybe not sit on idle equipment that obviously costs money is under some kind of maintenance, and you need to obviously resource to sport that. So I think that's a good conversation. When you guys get in with a customer and start to talk about Look, there's probably some areas here. We could save you money. So, yes, we're gonna charge you some money to get there. But the return on that is gonna be gonna be much better than where you want today. >> I love that answer. So look, look for quick hits. Try to demonstrate some some savings and generate some cash. If you will think like a business person, use that as a gain share approach. Maybe go to the CFO and say, Hey, if we can save this money can be reinvested in innovation. Drive more business value than you get that flywheel effect and you can build up credibility in your organization. And that's how you get from Point A to point B. Without going broke, he actually can make money for the organization that >> absolutely it's a very good point because, you know, we talked about earlier. You know, I t has been under constraint for quite a while, right? And so again, back to the ability for those people to think and have enough time to get into shitty strategic conversations all by themselves. It's difficult, if not impossible. So they need. They need help, They need consultants and they need trusted advisors. But obviously you need to prove your worth. I do think if you could start someplace where you can demonstrate Look, we could save you some real money here over the next year. 18 months, Two years is a great place to start. >> John, thanks so much for coming in and sharing your insights and best of luck out there. >> Well, thank you. I appreciate it very much. >> You're welcome. All right. Thank you for watching everybody. This is Dave Volante with the Cube. Will see you next time.
SUMMARY :
It's the cue Welcome to the Special Cube conversation. Appreciate you having me here today. Plus, you have, ah, deep background. I have something important to our customers always had a great basin infrastructure. And obviously, now you know, the cloud has been this huge disrupter. Can I securely move to the club, I mean, after the you know the dot com bust, everybody was focused on cutting costs. I think it's a lot of those things, you know, I think throughout our history it was all about putting I mean, obviously you have, you know, hippa considerations. And so I think that, you know, from an enforcement perspective, it's only really starting How are architectures, you know, changing today? There's for close to 20 years. And that kind of the promise of what technique So you guys come in with a holistic whole house view, obviously, so you're trying to help are gonna be the I think that a bit of the hope for if you will, left the station, and they want to shift their activities from things that air, A lot of cases, a lot of the ways that we've been able to retain our talents because but the ability to take advantage of the cloud and keep their their some of their I p, in a lot of that to John, I think, is bringing the cloud operating model to your data wherever And I think again I go back to health care a little bit. and and I think our ability to stay in business for that long has really been our The resource is so what do you D'oh, I think that's important because to your point there were challenges, their their budget constraints. better than where you want today. And that's how you get from Point A to point B. Without going broke, he actually can make money for the organization that I do think if you could start someplace where you can demonstrate Look, we could save you some real money here over I appreciate it very much. Thank you for watching everybody.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kevin Meaney | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Barker | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Dante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ONDA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
August 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
21st century | DATE | 0.99+ |
25 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave Volante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
H P Ease | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
3000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 mile | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months later | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
25 years later | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
25 years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
about 20 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Two years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
HP Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Today | DATE | 0.98+ |
next year | DATE | 0.98+ |
18 months | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Silicon Angle Media Office | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
25th anniversary | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Hattaway | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
10 15 years ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
once a year | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Versatile Local | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
close to 20 years | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Prem | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Nimble | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
two different directions | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Internet | EVENT | 0.89+ |
point B | OTHER | 0.89+ |
18 months | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
12 years | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
HPD | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
Unix | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
this year | DATE | 0.81+ |
three part | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
waves | EVENT | 0.78+ |
decades | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
point A | OTHER | 0.71+ |
past 25 years | DATE | 0.7+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
M | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.66+ |
uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
last several years | DATE | 0.62+ |
Point A | OTHER | 0.61+ |
Medicine | TITLE | 0.61+ |
Dhe | PERSON | 0.6+ |
New England | LOCATION | 0.56+ |
years | DATE | 0.56+ |
Versatile | PERSON | 0.55+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
of | DATE | 0.54+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.53+ |
Doc D'Errico, Infinidat | CUBEConversations, August 2019
>> from the Silicon Angle Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts. It's the cue Now, here's your host. Day Volonte. >> Hi, buddy. This is David Lantz. Welcome to this cube. Conversation with Dr Rico is the CMO of infinite out. It's still I still have a hard time saying that doctor or an engineer and I love having you on because we could talk storage. We could go deep and we could talk trends and marketing trends, too. But so welcome. Thanks for coming on my sled. So tell me what's new since the scale to win launch that you guys had. Tell me what you know. Is everything shipping Now What's the uptake been like with customers? And the reaction? Yeah, >> they're the reaction has been phenomenal. This, as you may recall, you were there. It was biggest launch in our history, which was fantastic. And the reaction has just been overwhelmingly positive, with customers with partners with analysts. Human scum cases with competitors is an interesting you know, we had a lot of things that were already shipping. They were an early customer release. There were a few things that we had started shipping in December on the things that we said we'd be coming in three Q. We G eight on time. So there, there now all generally available except the stuff that we talked about that would be available in 2020 which right now looks like it's on track. It's doing very, very well. >> So VM wear VM world eyes coming up later on this month, things are obviously changing. There was announcement recently that that VM wears gonna choir pivotal. So a little bit of financial engineering going on stock stock rose 77% on the day when the Dow dropped 800. So okay, the funny money. But things are changing in the V m where ecosystem you certainly saw we we This is our 10th year the M world. We go back and you hear Tod Nielsen back in the day, talk about for every dollar spent on a V M where lice and 15 was spent a Negro system, you know, we're kinda del izing vm wear now, which is sort of interesting, but I'm curious as to what you're seeing what that all means to you. I mean, still half a million 600,000 customers, you've got to be there you guys have great success at that show. So your thoughts what's going on? But VM world this year? Yeah, I >> kind of kind of loaded their first of all congratulations on the milestone. That's great. 10 years is super. Remember, probably seeing you with the 1st 1 there. Of course we knew each other longer. Uh, you know, and sure I get the incestuous, you know, money changing of hand there, I think I think it's it's good in one respect. You certainly CBM where, you know, making big inroads with VM wear on AWS. And this isn't now with Pivotal will be a good launching platform for Della's well, a svm where to be a little bit more in control of their own destiny. And it's certainly the way a lot of people are going. We're doing a lot of that ourselves. Not so much, in a sense. We don't have a cloud platform that we sell is a total encompassing platform. But of course, with new tricks cloud on big players and then certainly a large portion of our our customer base, our cloud service providers, they love our stuff. It helps them compete. It actually gives them in some respects, a competitive advantage, but VM world itself. Lots going on there. We have amplified our presence once again because VM where does represent a large portion of our customer base? So we're we're very proud of that. We're very proud to be a technology alliance partner of the M wears Andi. We're expecting to see a really good show in a really good cloud. A cloud crowd has they return back to their home base in San Francisco for us this year, it's It's gonna be a different experience. Were tellingme or of the software story, more of the portfolio story more about how you scare scale the win. We have a virtual presence this year, which is going to be very helpful in telling that story. Customers can come in and they can see more than just a ah box that in our world is really not important because it's for us. It's all about the software and stuff we do. We even in Booth Theater, we have some private meeting spaces well, to take people into a bigger, deeper drill down. But the virtual experience will allow them to touch and feel stuff that maybe they didn't get to do before, and that's gonna be kind of exciting as well. >> So you mentioned C S P s. We had Michael Gray thrive on a while back, and you know, he was saying that Look, he likes your product because it allows him to do other things. And don't worry about, you know, the old sort of tuning and managing and ableto re shift labor. I felt like that was an interesting discussion, primarily because you've got all these cloud service providers that everybody thought aws was just gonna kill. And if anything, it's elevated them. What are you seeing in the CSP space? Yeah, you know, >> Michael had a lot of interesting things to say that definitely love the fact that we enable multiple workloads without them having to do lots of cautious planning and re planning and shifting and shuffling. And we are seeing C S P is becoming more value. Add to a lot of businesses, especially the mid market and the smaller enterprise where people may want more than just infrastructure. You know, they don't they need that application level support and companies like thrive in some of our other really good customer, US signal and you know they're all capable of Flex Central's. Another one they're all capable of providing service is beyond the hardware they're capable of providing that application support the guidance and, in the case of Thrive, the cybersecurity guidance especial Really, which is really, really critical. So they're growing, and they're also, by the way, working with eight of us and Google and Azure to provide that capabilities well, when necessary. >> Well, that leads me to the sort of multi cloud discussion in our industry. We tend to have this alphabet soup of acronyms like another reason I like talking to you because we can kind of cut through that. And, you know, I love the marketing. I think marketing helps people understand what's going on differentiate. It gives you an indication of where the industry is going, and multi cloud is one of those things that I mean. I've kind of said it's a symptom of multi vendor and more so than a strategy. But increasingly it seems like it's becoming a strategy with customers, and you just gave an example of thrive working with multiple cloud vendors. Clearly, VM where wants to be in that business. What your thoughts on multi cloud and and hybrid. What does it mean for for infinite at What's your strategy there? You know, it's it's interesting because I >> just read an article the other day about you know, the definition of multi cloud on whether it's being abused and, you know, I I look at it as someone just trying to tell their story and give it. Give it some favor. I think at the end of the day, uh, every business is going to be talking to multiple platforms whether they want to or not. You know, there are many customers and companies out there, businesses who are in our customers who have gone the way of the cloud and repatriated. Certain things is they've they found that it it may work. It may not work, and there are many cloud providers who were trying to do things to accelerate migration of applications because they see that certain applications don't work. You know, we got one of the cloud providers buying Ah, now as provider, another one buying very recently, you know, an envy me based flash company to try to pick up those loose workloads where they might struggle today. But the end of the day everybody's going to be multiple. And whether it's because they're using cloud service is from from a software perspective or whether they just need to basically broker and maintain sort of that that independence so that they can maintain some cost control, availability, control, security, control and in some cases it will remain on premises. And some of things will be off just so they could get the applications closer to their end users. So you know what is multi Cloud? Multi Cloud really is just one of those terms that literally means what it says. It's your business running in multiple places. It doesn't have to necessarily be simultaneously by the same application. >> A big part of your value proposition is the simplicity. We've heard that from your customers, and you guys obviously push that out there. I want to ask you because you mentioned repatriation and you know, Cloud keeps growing like crazy. Sure, and the on prem not so much. You guys are smaller company. You're growing your stealing share, So yep. So maybe is that simplicity thing. Here's my question. So it's around automation. The cloud providers, generally an Amazon specifically have have driven automation. They've attacked the IittIe labor problem and they're able to charge for that on Dhe. So my question is, are you seeing that you're able to attack that labor problem in a similar sense and bring forth the value proposition to customers is Look, we can create a cloud like experience on Prem if you want MacLeod. Great. But if you want to stay on Prem, you're gonna get the benefit of being able to shift. Resource is two more strategic things and not have to worry about all this heavy, heavy lifting. You You seeing tangible evidence of that? >> We're seeing significant tangible evidence of that on and, you know, a couple of things. You know, you talk about growth, right? And I think when we did the launch, you know, only a few months ago we were at about 4.6 exabytes of capacity shipped. We just passed 5.1. That's some significant growth in in just a few months. It's like a 33% growth just from the same time last year, which is which is fairly significant. And of course, if you're familiar with the way we talk, you know you have an engineer is the head of marketing. We like to tell the truth. You know, we don't like to mask, do many things and confuse people. We don't like talking about effective storage because effective capacity doesn't really mean much to some people. So that's, you know, this is what we This is what we shipped and it's growing rapidly. And a lot of that is growing, in part because of the significance of the message and in part because of this need to control costs, contain costs and really operate in a more modern way. So get back to your comments about cloud and cloud operation. That's really what people want. People like the consumption model of cloud. They don't always like the cost on hidden costs. So simplifying that, but giving them the flexibility Thio have either an op X or cap ex that allows him to grow and shrink as they move workloads around. Because everybody grows even on Prem is growing. It's just, you know, it's the law of numbers, right? Cloud is growing, absolutely. But on Prem really is growing. And then the other thing I want is they want the operational flexibility. And that's what we talked about in our elastic data fabric. They don't like constantly having to re jigger and re balance workloads. Infinite box by itself. The platform of infinite Box takes away a lot of that mystery and magic, because it it kind of hides all of the complexity of that workload. And it, you know, we take the randomness out of the I o. I think maybe Craig Hibbert mentioned in his video is he was describing in detail how that happens. Remember Michael Gray talking about that as well, you know, So those those things come out in a single infinite box. But even if you said well, I still want to move my workload from, uh, you know this data center to an adjacent data center or perhaps a data center in another facility. Um, excuse me, Another city. So that's closer to the end user. Making that transparent to the applications is critically important. >> Yes, he talked about growth in about 1/2 a PETA bite. Sorry, half an exabyte in just a few months. A couple months? Really Right. That's that's growth. But I want to ask you about petabytes. Petabytes scales. Kind of key of companies that don't do that in a year day, eh? Exactly. So that's a petabytes scale. Is big party of marketing two questions? Why is that relevant? Or is that relevant to VM? Where customers? Why so and then, does it scare some people owe you? Asked a great question. >> It absolutely scared some people. And I know that there are some pundits out their industry pundits who who basically don't agree with our messaging. But this is this is the business problem that we we targeted the solve rate. Um, there are a lot of people out there who don't think they're petabytes scale yet because maybe they're individual applications aren't petabytes scale. But when you add it up, they get there and a lot of our customers are existing. Customers didn't start with infinite at at petabytes scale. They started a couple 100 terabytes, perhaps, but they're petabytes skill now. In fact, over 80% of the customers and systems that we have out there today or above the petty bite. We have customers that are in the tens of petabytes. We have customers that are in the hundreds of petabytes. They grow, they grow rapidly on. Why is that? Well, to two factors. Really. Number one, if you go back to. Probably when I first met you back when I had your hair, at least in quantity, way had way. Were kind of crusting that terabyte mark. Right? Right. And what was the problem? The problem was nobody could figure out how to deal with the performance. Nobody wanted to put that much risk on a single platform, so they couldn't deal with the availability. And they really didn't know how to deal with even the serviceability of that scale. So terabyte was a problem solved No, 25 years ago, and then things were rapidly from there. Now we're at the same juncture, just three orders of magnitude later. Right? >> Well, that's interesting, because, you know, you're right. People didn't want to put all all that capacity under an actuator that cost performance problems. They were concerned about, you know, just availability. And then two things happen so simultaneously, flash comes along. And, you know, you would say was put sort of a Band aid to some of the performance problems. Sure. And you guys came up with, like, this magic sauce to actually use spinning disc and get the same performance or better performance you would argue with flash. And so as a result, you were now able to do a lot Maur with the data, the concerns about that much date under the actuator somewhat attenuated because, I mean, you've got now so much data, you've got to do something that's almost that's flywheel effective. You've got tons of data machine intelligence and a I. Now, coming into the picture, you've got Cloud, which has been this huge tail when for the industry and for data creation in general. And so I see. You know, you see, like the I. D. C numbers and for forecasting growth of data and storage could be low. I mean, the curve could be bending, you know, kind of more than exponentially your thoughts on that. >> Yeah, it's an interesting, interesting observation. I think what it really comes down to is our storyline is math is greater than media, all right? And when you when you look at the flash being, you know, the panacea to performance it was just a step in the evolution, right? You go back and and say, spinning disc was the same solution to the performance problem 20 years ago. 25 years ago, even it was 5400 rpm discs and then very rapidly. Servers got faster. The interconnects got a little bit faster. They were still mostly differential. Scuzzy. There was 7200 rpm discs. And I promise you, by the way, that if you're running 5400 rpm desk, you install 7200 rpm. All yours performance problems will go away until the day you install it. And then it was 10,000 rpm discs and I was 15,000 rpm disc, and it still wasn't getting fast enough because, you know, you went to Fibre Channel One Gig Fibre channel and then to Geek Fibre, Channel four, Gig fibre, Channel eight, gig fibre channel. The unified connects got faster. The servers got faster. That was more cash on the servers. Then this thing came along, cuts called solid state disc. Right. And then it was it was SLC single layer cell technology. But don't worry about it's very expensive. Not a problem. You only need 4% of your application, right? Jerry? No, no, I'm sorry. percent. No, I'm sorry. 30%. What the heck? You know, M l c is now a little bit more reliable, so let's just make make it all slash. Right? So that was the end of the story, right? No. Servers continue to get faster. Uh, the media continue to get faster and denser, right? So now the interconnect isn't fast enough, So envy me. Is that the answer to life? The universe and everything? Well, wait. I got a better answer for your test. CIA storage class memory in parallel with that. By the way, there are some vendors out there who said that's still not fast enough. We want to put more d ram and the servers and do things in memory. We went in memory databases. I guarantee whatever you do from a media perspective on my personal guarantee to you, it's obsolete by the time you're up and running. By the time you get your applications migrated, configured and running with business value, it's already obsolete. Some vendors got something better coming out. The right answers. This stuff you talked about, the right answer is everything that you're doing for your business. APs. It's a it's a Mel. It's solving the problems in software and, you know, you said we use disc and make it fast. It's not despite itself, of course, right? It's D Bram. It's a lot of the Ram, which, by the way, is orders of magnitude faster than flash the NAND flash. And even if its ECM and still orders of magnitude faster than that, what we use the disk for today in the architecture is the cost factor. We take the random ization out in the flash and we take the >> end and in the in the diagram >> and we used the SAS in the back end to manage costs. But we use it in a way that it performs well, which is highly sequential, massively parallel. And we take full advantage of that Beck and Ben with to do that with that massive dear am front end. Our cash ratios are unparalleled in the industry and and we use it even more effectively that way. But if architecture already evolves, so if if SCM becomes more stable and becomes more cost effective, we can replace that that S S D layer with the cm. And if you know, if the economics of Q L C or something beyond that. Come down will replace the back end with that, do you? Do >> you ever look at what you're doing today as sort of a modern day symmetric. So I mean, a lot of things you just said. I mean, you've got a lot of memory. You've got a massive back end. You know, those were two of the characteristics of symmetric snow. Of course. Fast forward. Whatever. 30 years, right. But a lot of it was sort of intelligence and understanding. Sure. So how data works, is it Is it a fair sort of, or is it radically different? Well, in terms of mindset, I mean, I know the implementation is >> right, right? >> Yeah. I mean, it's not an unfair comparison. I mean, tiered storage was around before some metrics. Right? So it's certainly existed existed then, too. It was just at the time. It was a significant innovation course to layer at the time, right? A big cash front, ending some slower media and then taking advantage of the media on the back end. The big difference today is that if you look at what some metrics became through its Evolution's DMX and V Max and now Power Max. It's still tiered storage, you know, you still have some cash. That's that's for unending some faster media with power. Max, you're you're dealing now with us with an SS a back end. But what happened with those types of architectures is the tearing became more automated. But you're still moving information around. You're still moving Information from one said it This to another set of this leader in the cycle. You're still trying to promote things you know, to to the cash up front. We're doing it in real time. We're >> doing it by analyzing >> the data on the way it comes in. We're reassembling it again, taking the random ization out we're reassembling it and storing it across multiple disks in a way that it it increases our probability of pulling that information associated information back when we need it later. So there's there's no movement. Once its place, we don't have to replace it. You know it's already associated with other data that makes sense, and that gives us a lot of value. >> And secret sauce is the outcome of the secret sauce is you're able to very efficiently. Well, historically, you haven't been able to do a lot of garbage collection, a lot of data movement, and that just kills performance. There's >> really no garbage collection necessary in our in our world way. Also use very modern data structures or patents. Ah, lot of them on our neural cash Deal with the fact that we use a try data structure. So we're not using old fashioned hash tables and you know, l are you algorithms, You know it Sze very, very rapid traverse a ll of these trees >> and you're taking advantage of machine intelligence inside the software architecture. That really is some of the new innovation that really wasn't around to be able to take advantage of that 20 years ago. Maybe it was it was just not cost effective. Do the math was there, put it that the math of the mouth was there and >> there there There's been lots of evolutions of that over the years, a swell, but we continue to evolve and innovate. And, you know, one of the one of the cool things I think about working infinite at is is the multiple multiple generations of engineer where you've got people who understand that math they understand the real nuances of what it means to operate in a world of storage, which is quite a bit different than operating, saying networks or proceed be used because data integrity is paramount. There's lots of lots of things that go on there as well. But we also have younger generations, generations who like new challenges and like to re invent things so they find newer and greater ways to do things. >> This is exciting. So systems, thinkers and I mean server thinkers. I mean, people who understand, you know, systems designed it all the way through and and, you know, newbies who are super smart like you say, wanna learn and solve problems? Go back to the petabytes scale discussion, >> solve problems at petabytes scale, right? Even if the customer doesn't need that necessarily to solve that problem is critically important because even if you look at Les, just take, you know NFS, for example, most NFS systems deal with thousands of objects. Hundreds to thousands of objects are an F s. Implementation deals with billions, right? Do you need billions? How many applications you know that have billions of objects, But being able to do that in a way where performance doesn't degrade over time and also do it in a way where we say our nlm implementation isn't impacted by any any type of service events, we can take a note out, and it doesn't impact in ln There's no no degradation and performance. There's no impact or outage in service. All that's important. Even when you're dealing with smaller application sizes because they add up, they really do add up. He also brought up the point about, you know, density and actually intensity. Great. You know, back 25 years ago, when we were dealing with, you know, the first terabyte storage system, you know, how much how much stories did you have on your laptop? How much you have today, right? You know, you're probably more than a terabyte. They were laughing about putting things terabyte on the floor. And now you get more than a terabyte on your laptop. Things changing? >> Yeah. Um, I wanna ask you where you see the competition. We talked about all flash. We've had a long conversation, long, many conversations in the past about this, But you really, you know, the all flashy kind of described it as a Band Aid, essentially my words, but it was sort of a step function. Okay, great. Um, you have one company, really us who achieve escape velocity in that business in terms of pure But is that where you see in competition and you're seeing it from, you know, the hyper scale er's where you Yeah, you know, >> it's interesting. You know, you look at companies like, you know, we admire what they dio, especially with regard to marketing. They do a really good job of that. They also, um I have some really interesting ideas innovating the media, which is which is great. It helps us in the long run as well. Um, we just look at it as a component of our system, not these system, which makes it different. We don't really see the A f a. You know, the small scale a FAA is are the majority of our competition. We do run into them, but typically it the lower end of the opportunity. Even within the bigger companies that have competitors to those products, we run into them and smaller opportunities, not bigger opportunities where we run into them where there's a significant performance advantage as long as you don't mind the scale out approach to solving the problem. Unfortunately, when you're using a phase two skill out, you know you're putting all of the intelligence requirements on some poor storage administrator or system administrator to figure out what those where right, we take all of that away. So once it starts to scale, that's where we come in a plan. We don't see tons of competition there. Certainly, we're seeing competition from the clouds. And the competition from the clouds is more born of customer mandates and company mandates. Sometimes they I'm not quite sure that everybody knows why there who think to the cloud and we're problem they're trying to solve. But once they start to see a story that says, Hey, if the reasons are and you do understand those reasons, if the reasons are agility and financial flexibility and operational agility not as well as his acquisition agility, you know, we have answers to that and it starts to become a little bit more interesting and compelling. >> All right. One of the highlights of the M world each year is your dinner. Your customer I crashed in a couple of years ago when there were no other analysts there. And then last year again, it was in Vegas. Shows a nice steak house. This year we're in San Francisco, but But I had some great conversations with customers. I remember speaking to one customer about juxtaposing the sand thio to infinite debts platform. And you know the difference. The Sands taken off doing really well, but But he helped me understand the thinking from their standpoint of how they're applying it to solve problems and why v san wasn't a good fit. Your system was, um that was just one of many conversations last year had again other great conversations with customers. What do you do in this year? You have a customer dinner. We are? Yeah. We love to have you in and gave the invitation there. Yeah, the invitation. Is that definitely there? You know, a couple of >> years ago we didn't invite analysts, and you know what it was? It was a mistake. We and we learned that lesson into a large part. We credit you for for showing us how wrong we are. Our customers are very loyal. They're some of the most loyal in the industry. Don't take my word for it going. The gardener Pierre Insights and and look at our numbers compared to everybody else's any pick. Pick a vendor. We're at the top of the list with regard to not only the ratings but, more importantly, the customers willingness to recommend in every category, too. By the way, it's It's not just product quality and performance, and it's it's service support. It's easy doing business. It's an entirely different experience. So we love having the customers there, and the customers love having you there, too. They love having you and your appears in the industry there because they love learning from you and they love answering the questions and getting new insights. And we'd love to have you there. We're gonna be in the Mint this year. San Francisco meant not the not the current one that that's pretty coins, but the original historical site on duh. You know we have. We have invitations out thio to about 130 people because there's only so much room we have it at the event, but we're looking forward to a great time and a great meal and good conversation. >> That's great. Well, VM World is obviously one of the marquee events in our industry. It's the It's the fat middle of where the IittIe pro goes on dhe We're excited. Used to be Labor Day started the fall season. Now it's VM world. Well, Doc will see you out there. Thanks very much for your good to see you. All right. Excellent. All right. Thank you for watching everybody. This is day Volonte in the Cube will see you next time we'll see you at the M World 2019.
SUMMARY :
It's the cue It's still I still have a hard time saying that doctor or an engineer and I love having you on because And the reaction has just been overwhelmingly positive, with customers with partners But things are changing in the V m where ecosystem you certainly saw we the software story, more of the portfolio story more about how you scare scale And don't worry about, you know, the old sort of tuning and managing and ableto Michael had a lot of interesting things to say that definitely love the fact that we enable multiple And, you know, I love the marketing. just read an article the other day about you know, the definition of multi cloud on whether it's So my question is, are you seeing that you're able to attack And a lot of that is growing, in part because of the significance But I want to ask you about petabytes. We have customers that are in the tens of petabytes. Well, that's interesting, because, you know, you're right. By the time you get your applications And if you know, if the economics of Q L C or something So I mean, a lot of things you just said. you know, you still have some cash. the data on the way it comes in. And secret sauce is the outcome of the secret sauce is you're able to very efficiently. fashioned hash tables and you know, l are you algorithms, That really is some of the new innovation that really wasn't around to be able to take advantage And, you know, one of the one of the cool things I think about you know, systems designed it all the way through and and, you know, how much how much stories did you have on your laptop? is that where you see in competition and you're seeing it from, you know, the hyper scale er's where you Hey, if the reasons are and you do understand those reasons, if the reasons are agility We love to have you in and gave the invitation there. So we love having the customers there, and the customers love having you there, too. This is day Volonte in the Cube will see you next time we'll see you at the M World 2019.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David Lantz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Craig Hibbert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Gray | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
7200 rpm | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5400 rpm | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
December | DATE | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
33% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
August 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15,000 rpm | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10,000 rpm | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two questions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two factors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Doc | PERSON | 0.99+ |
billions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
77% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
This year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jerry | PERSON | 0.99+ |
over 80% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10th year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds of petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Rico | PERSON | 0.98+ |
800 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
25 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Doc D'Errico | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Prem | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one company | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
billions of objects | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Ben | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Tod Nielsen | PERSON | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Labor Day | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Silicon Angle Media Office | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.97+ |
more than a terabyte | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
half an exabyte | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
thousands of objects | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
one customer | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
single platform | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
half a million 600,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Cube | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
M wears Andi | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Beck | PERSON | 0.95+ |
M World 2019 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
tens of petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first terabyte | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Dr | PERSON | 0.95+ |
about 130 people | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
CIA | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
VM World | EVENT | 0.94+ |
100 terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
couple of years ago | DATE | 0.93+ |
Andy Palmer, TAMR | MIT CDOIQ 2019
>> from Cambridge, Massachusetts. It's the Cube covering M. I. T. Chief Data officer and Information Quality Symposium 2019 Brought to you by Silicon Angle Media >> Welcome back to M I. T. Everybody watching the Cube. The leader in live tech coverage we hear a Day two of the M I t chief data officer information Quality Conference Day Volonte with Paul Dillon. Andy Palmer's here. He's the co founder and CEO of Tamer. Good to see again. It's great to see it actually coming out. So I didn't ask this to Mike. I could kind of infirm from someone's dances. But why did you guys start >> Tamer? >> Well, it really started with an academic project that Mike was doing over at M. I. T. And I was over in of artists at the time. Is the chief get officer over there? And what we really found was that there were a lot of companies really suffering from data mastering as the primary bottleneck in their company did used great new tech like the vertical system that we've built and, you know, automated a lot of their warehousing and such. But the real bottleneck was getting lots of data integrated and mastered really, really >> quickly. Yeah, He took us through the sort of problems with obviously the d. W. In terms of scaling master data management and the scanning problems was Was that really the problem that you were trying to solve? >> Yeah, it really was. And when we started, I mean, it was like, seven years ago, eight years ago, now that we started the company and maybe almost 10 when we started working on the academic project, and at that time, people weren't really thinking are worried about that. They were still kind of digesting big data. A zit was called, but I think what Mike and I kind of felt was going on was that people were gonna get over the big data, Um, and the volume of data. And we're going to start worrying about the variety of the data and how to make the data cleaner and more organized. And, uh, I think I think way called that one pretty much right. Maybe >> we're a little >> bit early, but but I think now variety is the big problem >> with the other thing about your big day. Big data's oftentimes associated with Duke, which was a batch and then you sort of saw the shifter real time and spark was gonna fix all that. And so what are you seeing in terms of the trends in terms of how data is being used to drive almost near real time business decisions. >> You know, Mike and I came out really specifically back in 2007 and declared that we thought, uh, Hadoop and H D f s was going to be far less impactful than other people. >> 07 >> Yeah, Yeah. And Mike Mike actually was really aggressive and saying it was gonna be a disaster. And I think we've finally seen that actually play out of it now that the bloom is off the rose, so to speak. And so they're They're these fundamental things that big companies struggle with in terms of their data and, you know, cleaning it up and organizing it and making it, Iike want. Anybody that's worked at one of these big companies can tell you that the data that they get from most of their internal system sucks plain and simple, and so cleaning up that data, turning it into something it's an asset rather than liability is really what what tamers all about? And it's kind of our mission. We're out there to do this and it sort of pails and compare. Do you think about the amount of money that some of these companies have spent on systems like ASAP on you're like, Yeah, but all the data inside of the systems so bad and so, uh, ugly and unuseful like we're gonna fix that problem. >> So you're you're you're special sauce and machine learning. Where are you applying machine learning most most effectively when >> we apply machine learning to probably the least sexy problem on the planet. There are a lot of companies out there that use machine learning and a I t o do predictive algorithms and all kinds of cool stuff. All we do with machine learning is actually use it to clean up data and organize data. Get it ready for people to use a I I I started in the eye industry back in the late 19 eighties on, you know, really, I learned from the sky. Marvin Minsky and Mark Marvin taught me two things. First was garbage in garbage out. There's no algorithm that's worth anything unless you've got great data, and the 2nd 1 is it's always about the human in the machine working together. And I've really been working on those two same principles most of my career, and Tamer really brings both of those together. Our goal is to prepare data so that it can be used analytically inside of these companies, that it's actually high quality and useful. And the way we do that involves bringing together the machine, mostly these advanced machine learning algorithms with humans, subject matter experts inside of these companies that actually know all the ins and outs and all the intricacies of the data inside of their company. >> So say garbage in garbage out. If you don't have good training data course you're not going good ML model. How much how much upfront work is required. G. I know it was one of your customers and how much time is required to put together on ML model that can deal with 20,000,000 records like that? >> Well, you know, the amazing thing that this happened for us in the last five years, especially is that now we've got we've built enough models from scratch inside of these large global 2000 companies that very rarely do we go into a place where there we don't already have a model that's pre built. That they can use is a starting point. And I think that's the same thing that's happening in modeling in general. If you look a great companies like data robot Andi and even in in the Python community ml live that the accessibility of these modeling tools and the models themselves are actually so they're commoditized. And so most of our models and most of the projects we work on, we've already got a model. That's a starting point. We don't really have to start from scratch. >> You mentioned gonna ta I in the eighties Is that is the notion of a I Is it same as it was in the eighties and now we've just got the tooling, the horsepower, the data to take advantage of it is the concept changed? The >> math is all the same, like, you know, absolutely full stop, like there's really no new math. The two things I think that have changed our first. There's a lot more data that's available now, and, you know, uh, neural nets are a great example, right? in Marvin's things that, you know when you look at Google translate and how aggressively they used neural nets, it was the quantity of data that was available that actually made neural nets work. The second thing that that's that's changed is the cheap availability of Compute that Now the largest supercomputer in the world is available to rent by the minute. And so we've got all this data. You've got all this really cheap compute. And then third thing is what you alluded to earlier. The accessibility of all the math that now it's becoming so simple and easy to apply these math techniques, and they're becoming you know, it's It's almost to the point where the average data scientists not the advance With the average data, scientists can do a practice. Aye, aye. Techniques that 20 years ago required five PhDs. >> It's not surprising that Google, with its new neural net technology, all the search data that it has has been so successful. It's a surprise you that that Amazon with Alexa was able to compete so effectively. >> Oh, I think that I would never underestimate Amazon and their ability to, you know, build great tact. They've done some amazing work. One of my favorite Mike and I actually, one of our favorite examples in the last, uh, three years, they took their red shift system, you know, that competed with with Veronica and they they re implemented it and, you know, as a compiled system and it really runs incredibly fast. I mean, that that feat of engineering, what was truly exceptional >> to hear you say that Because it wasn't Red Shift originally Park. So yeah, that's right, Larry Ellison craps all over Red Shift because it's just open source offer that they just took and repackage. But you're saying they did some major engineering to Oh >> my gosh, yeah, It's like Mike and I both way Never. You know, we always compared par, excelled over tika, and, you know, we always knew we were better in a whole bunch of ways. But this this latest rewrite that they've done this compiled version like it's really good. >> So as a guy has been doing a eye for 30 years now, and it's really seeing it come into its own, a lot of a I project seems right now are sort of low hanging fruit is it's small scale stuff where you see a I in five years what kind of projects are going our bar company's gonna be undertaking and what kind of new applications are gonna come out of this? But >> I think we're at the very beginning of this cycle, and actually there's a lot more potential than has been realized. So I think we are in the pick the low hanging fruit kind of a thing. But some of the potential applications of A I are so much more impactful, especially as we modernize core infrastructure in the enterprise. So the enterprise is sort of living with this huge legacy burden. And we always air encouraging a tamer our customers to think of all their existing legacy systems is just dated generating machines and the faster they can get that data into a state where they can start doing state of the art A. I work on top of it, the better. And so really, you know, you gotta put the legacy burden aside and kind of draw this line in the sand so that as you really get, build their muscles on the A. I side that you can take advantage of that with all the data that they're generating every single day. >> Everything about these data repose. He's Enterprise Data Warehouse. You guys built better with MPP technology. Better data warehouses, the master data management stuff, the top down, you know, Enterprise data models, Dupin in big data, none of them really lived up to their promise, you know? Yeah, it's kind of somewhat unfair toe toe like the MPP guys because you said, Hey, we're just gonna run faster. And you did. But you didn't say you're gonna change the world and all that stuff, right? Where's e d? W? Did Do you feel like this next wave is actually gonna live up to the promise? >> I think the next phase is it's very logical. Like, you know, I know you're talking to Chris Lynch here in a minute, and you know what? They're doing it at scale and at scale and tamer. These companies are all in the same general area. That's kind of related to how do you take all this data and actually prepare it and turn it into something that's consumable really quickly and easily for all of these new data consumers in the enterprise and like so that that's the next logical phase in this process. Now, will this phase be the one that finally sort of meets the high expectations that were set 2030 years ago with enterprise data warehousing? I don't know, but we're certainly getting closer >> to I kind of hoped knockers, and we'll have less to do any other cool stuff that you see out there. That was a technology just >> I'm huge. I'm fanatical right now about health care. I think that the opportunity for health care to be transformed with technology is, you know, almost makes everything else look like chump change. What aspect of health care? Well, I think that the most obvious thing is that now, with the consumer sort of in the driver seat in healthcare, that technology companies that come in and provide consumer driven solutions that meet the needs of patients, regardless of how dysfunctional the health care system is, that's killer stuff. We had a great company here in Boston called Pill Pack was a great example of that where they just build something better for consumers, and it was so popular and so, you know, broadly adopted again again. Eventually, Amazon bought it for $1,000,000,000. But those kinds of things and health care Pill pack is just the beginning. There's lots and lots of those kinds of opportunities. >> Well, it's right. Healthcare's ripe for disruption on, and it hasn't been hit with the digital destruction. And neither is financialservices. Really? Certainly, defenses has not yet another. They're high risk industry, so Absolutely takes longer. Well, Andy, thanks so much for making the time. You know, You gotta run. Yeah. Yeah. Thank you. All right, keep it right. Everybody move back with our next guest right after this short break. You're watching the Cube from M I T c B O Q. Right back.
SUMMARY :
you by Silicon Angle Media But why did you guys start like the vertical system that we've built and, you know, the problem that you were trying to solve? now that we started the company and maybe almost 10 when we started working on the academic And so what are you seeing in terms of the trends in terms of how data that we thought, uh, Hadoop and H D f s was going to be far big companies struggle with in terms of their data and, you know, cleaning it up and organizing Where are you applying machine the eye industry back in the late 19 eighties on, you know, If you don't have good training data course And so most of our models and most of the projects we work on, we've already got a model. math is all the same, like, you know, absolutely full stop, like there's really no new math. It's a surprise you that that Amazon implemented it and, you know, as a compiled system and to hear you say that Because it wasn't Red Shift originally Park. we always compared par, excelled over tika, and, you know, we always knew we were better in a whole bunch of ways. And so really, you know, you gotta put the legacy of them really lived up to their promise, you know? That's kind of related to how do you take all this data and actually to I kind of hoped knockers, and we'll have less to do any other cool stuff that you see out health care to be transformed with technology is, you know, Well, Andy, thanks so much for making the time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Palmer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mark Marvin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Paul Dillon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
$1,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chris Lynch | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Marvin Minsky | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Larry Ellison | PERSON | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Cambridge, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Angle Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20,000,000 records | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two same principles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
eight years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mike Mike | PERSON | 0.98+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
late 19 eighties | DATE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2030 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
2nd 1 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
five PhDs | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Veronica | PERSON | 0.97+ |
M I. T. | PERSON | 0.96+ |
Marvin | PERSON | 0.96+ |
20 years ago | DATE | 0.96+ |
Python | TITLE | 0.96+ |
eighties | DATE | 0.94+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.94+ |
2000 companies | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Red Shift | TITLE | 0.94+ |
Duke | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Alexa | TITLE | 0.91+ |
last five years | DATE | 0.9+ |
M I t | EVENT | 0.88+ |
almost 10 | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
TAMR | PERSON | 0.86+ |
Andi | PERSON | 0.8+ |
M. I. T. | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
Tamer | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
Information Quality Symposium | EVENT | 0.78+ |
Quality Conference Day Volonte | EVENT | 0.77+ |
Tamer | PERSON | 0.77+ |
Google translate | TITLE | 0.75+ |
single day | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
H | PERSON | 0.71+ |
Chief | PERSON | 0.66+ |
Hadoop | PERSON | 0.64+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
more | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
M. I. T. | PERSON | 0.57+ |
Pill pack | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.56+ |
Pill Pack | ORGANIZATION | 0.53+ |
D f s | ORGANIZATION | 0.48+ |
Park | TITLE | 0.44+ |
CDOIQ | EVENT | 0.32+ |
Cube | PERSON | 0.27+ |
CUBEConversation: AWS Mid-2019 Update
>> from the Silicon Angle Media Office in Boston, Massachusetts. It's the cue. Now, here's your host. Day Volonte. >> Hi, >> everybody. Welcome to this cute conversation. I'm Dave Volonte and Stew Minuteman is here with me. We're gonna break down a w s kind of give you Ah, midyear What's happened so far this year with all the events that we've been covering and what to look forward to? Uh, the N Y C Summit is coming up stew. It's been a big year. Obviously. What we came off a re invent. Amazon's got $30,000,000,000 run rate business growing at 40 plus percent per year. That means they're putting 9,000,000,000 of incremental revenue every year into the cloud business. The marketplace, That growth that's roughly as large is tthe e entire Microsoft cloud business, which is astounding >> day that that that's that's the point Amazon definitely has been making for a couple of years. And you're absolutely right. Microsoft is definitely growing at a faster pace than Amazon, and they're running about 75 87 but off a much smaller number. So the incremental add that Amazon has been throwing off the last couple years. Every year they're adding more than an azure every year. So absolutely Amazon, you know, is the lead horse out there. And while you know, the horses on the track behind them are trying fast to catch up Amazon. If you talk about Infrastructures service, AWS is still the lead. >> Well, the big question is. Will that attenuate? And we were at Remember the Nutanix inaugural Nutanix Stop next? Do you rush Pandey, who's very smart guy, somebody we respect a lot. One of the fundamental assumptions they were making is eventually the law of large numbers will catch up to them and know it very well May. But it hasn't yet. I asked John Lovelock, can a company the size of Amazon $30,000,000,000 company grow it for 42% a year? Is that sustainable? And he said, Absolutely. There's nothing to stop them now. Who knows who has the crystal ball? What are your thoughts? >> Yeah, So, Dave, what we saw is Amazon's not sitting still. You know, they always like to say it's always Day one, and if you look at where they're going, the products that they keep throwing off the innovation that they keep moving on and the flywheel that they've had first of customer acquisition with all of the innovations that they're putting out there and the flight well. But I've been talking about the last couple of years the label of data, which is something we want to be a little concerned about. How much data Amazon actually does have both Amazon AWS and Amazon, with all those intelligent devices that are in your homes and connecting everything together. Some people are a little concerned about that. The government's a little bit concerned about that, but absolutely Amazon is going everywhere. We've seen Amazon going into sub segments of the market, going into verticals and going just really broad, really deep. So absolutely I don't see anything slowing a bit on down. It is a company that continues to impress one of >> the challenges. I think those do that that Amazon does have, and this came out of the reinforced >> conference a couple weeks ago in Boston, which was, Ah, conference for security practitioners, a lot of si SOS chief information security officers. The number one challenge that came out of that when you talk to practitioners was their ability to keep up with the innovations that Amazon is putting forth. So, you know, I wonder if we're gonna talk to some commercial customers. You'll see them down the summit probe to see if, in fact, that's part of their challenge. Just the pace at which Amazon brings out new features. But we've done Gosh, we've covered eight events or will have covered eight events this year. Eight productions. It started in the U. K. Where we covered a public sector health care. And then we did the AWS summit London really all about both public sector in the UK as well as the summit in the UK Innovations in the UK around cloud, etcetera, cloud adoption. 12,000 people at the AWS London summit. Now you covered re Mars, which was not the Cube wasn't there, but you were there. What was that show? >> Yes. So, first of all, it's an Amazon >> show, not a native US show, but absolutely showed underneath where eight of us fits into the fulfillment centers of Amazon. And it was about re Marceau Mars A play of course on space. But it was a machine learning automation, robotics in space. So you had the cool blue origin stuff that actually brought in. Robert Downey Jr talked about how he's going to save the planet with, you know, robotics and intelligence out there to help clean up pollution in the globe on and the like. But it was a phenomenal show, but what I said is actually going to show a little bit underneath the covers of Amazon similar what we've seen from eight of us at the reinvent shows over the years. Because, you know, we all know how many boxes air coming to our, you know, our place of home every day and how fast that's going. And so this is what's happening underneath the robotics and machine learning a lot of those Air AWS Service's that are powering that. So it was a fascinating show, Dave and absolutely showed other relationship between Amazon, the parent company. Eight of us, all those cloud service is that helped feed the bigger business. >> Now, June, the Cube covered the D. C. Public sector summit. This is Teresa Carlson's gig. She's the host. Actually, Andy Jassy was there this time. He wasn't there last year when you and I recovering it. And of course, that's all about bringing cloud to public sector, not just federal but all public sector. It includes AH, non profit and education, which talk about in a minute. The big story. There is a jet. I we're talking about tens of billions of dollars going to ah, contract. Oracle, of course, is fighting it. It's going into the courts. I guess they've been a number of reviews or could won't give up its oracle. Amazon clearly is the front runner. Last I read, it was down to AWS and Microsoft, with AWS being the lead contender there. We'll see what happens. I think the decision is coming down this month, July 2019. But it's really again about bringing cloud innovations to public sector. Public sector tends to take things a little bit later than the commercial like. For instance, last year they announced the the VM wear on AWS was available, so you'll see those kinds of things come maybe a year later. But its again. Another big show there 12. 13,000 people there at the D. C Convention center. >> Yeah, Davey, when you talked about the critique of what's happening in Amazon as Amazon goes deeper into all of these verticals How do they help get that information to the user in a way that they need to run their businesses? So my co host for New York City's Cory Quinn was listen to his podcast this morning and he said, That's where Amazon's got dozens of blog's. They've got so many announcements, they haven't done a really good job, something we've seen many companies do. How do I get to you know that business roll and put it in, you know, verbal that they understand, as opposed to just >> Hey, we had 1000 new features >> come out this year and they're awesome. Then you should use everything s o. You know, that's something that, you know the industry as a whole needs to do better at an Amazon. Just in the nature of how fast they're moving is something that they should be able to do a better job. >> And Jennifer is also gonna be in New York City. And one of things he was stressing at reinforce was the marketplace. We had Dave McCann on the just rocketing. I think it was 100,000 census of security subscriptions. I think it was 1,000,000 subscriptions in total so just an amazing ah momentum in the marketplace. But reinforce was all about security. Deep dives on security, chief information, security officers. What came out of that show the big takeaway was was head of AWS is, uh, security. The chief information security officer, Schmidt said. This narrative in the industry that the sky is falling doesn't do anybody any good. Um, it's not productive. We should be more positive. The state of the cloud union is good, like the president of states is State of the Union is strong. Um, having said that, Amazon talks about the shared security model. The practitioners that we talked to said, Yeah, shared model Amazon's going to secure the the infrastructure of the storage, the compute of the database. We are responsible for our end, and it really is on us to make sure that we are secure. So again, back to that point about the pace of innovation that Amazon is putting forth is a challenge for people. AWS imagine is also going down. I think this week what's that you're >> so it's in Seattle and it's you mentioned the public Sector one in D. C, which is government agencies, nonprofits and education. So imagine is a subset of that. My understanding is the education, a nonprofit piece of that from when you and I were in D. C. Last year for the Public sector summit. It's It is impressive how deep Amazon is going into these spaces, the affinity they have. And really, you know how happy the customers are to be able to move fast. So, you know, when you think about nonprofits and think about education, innovation is not the first thing that usually comes to mind because budgets are tight and I don't have enough people. And usually you've got, you know, whatever's left over. But imagine is them. How do we move these forward? How do we You know, we know we need to help transform education. It's so important to train the next generation. So, you know, imagine there are some great stories that come out of that. Jeffrey loves getting those stories, helping us tell those stories through the Cube platform. And so it's the second year we're doing >> Yes, it would be covering that. And then, of course, reinvent will have two sets again that reinvent this year. The Super >> Bowl of our industry, >> right? Sure. Um, something's going on. So unfortunate incidents in Southern California. Big earthquakes, actually. Multiple earthquakes, Right? You had the physical earthquake, and then you had CO I, leonard going to the Clippers. But so I'm interested in sort of poking at this notion of ground stations. So at reinvent last year, Amazon announced on his own ground station, which essentially was ground station is a service. So if I understand it, one of the challenges okay, You launched the satellites, but you still need a ground station to collect the data and then uploaded and analyze it. That's what AWS is is partnering to put in infrastructure that allows you to essentially rent ground station infrastructure. So, you know, they worry about building it in securing it yourself. Because you think about it. It's got to be a secure location. You gotta have fencing. You got a physical security. You got to get the data in. You gotta upload it to the toe. Where we gonna upload it? So Amazon is basically building this service out, saying Don't worry about the ground station piece. Rent that from us, you know, swipe your credit card. Your ground station as a service, and then we'll ingest that data uploaded to the cloud and then apply all of the tooling that we have to allow you to analyze that data. So if you think about the earthquake of devastation, if you don't have a ground station there, you can, in theory, go to AWS and actually spin up a ground station in jest. You know, on the ground, you know, the ground truth as we like to sometimes talk about and actually get satellite imaging and telemetry in that region, you know, this comes into play things like forest fires and all kinds of of natural disaster. >> Dave, even at the remarks show, I attended a session where one of the Amazon partners was talking about not only just getting the satellite data down, but Justus. They have the snowball edge today, which is, you know, for you know, I ot or some remote sites, but some of these satellites are gonna have the compute and storage at in satellite themselves. So if you think about I'm gonna have these geosynchronous satellites. I'm gonna have all this connectivity. And if I could get a gigabit of Ethernet, you know, traffic going to the satellites and I could do the processing at the edge, which is now up in space. I can process that. And you know, that edge that we talked about get to hold another dimension, you know, off off the terra firma to be able to do those kind of analysis. As you said, earthquakes, you know, all the all the climate discussion that's going on, we should be able to have tap into even more. Resource is, and we'll have to rename Cloud if it even goes beyond the Earth. >> And then, um, outpost is the other story that we've been tracking, attracting a lot of stories, but but outpost is starting to ship in beta form. We've seen instances of >> so, so seeing >> it. We just did a little quick right up. >> I mean, Dave, you know, just a ripple went through the >> industry when they showed Hey, here's Iraq and what they're like. This is the exact same rack that we have in the Amazon data centers and why it's a little surprising because we're allowed to see inside the Amazon Data Center. So it's like, Okay, this is what they're computed awaited to 24 in tracking, supposed to a 19 in track. But that line between the public cloud and my on premises environment absolutely is blurring. So everybody wants to see where Amazon's going. They have the big partnership with VM, where Veum, where is already shipping the solution? That is the same software for that Veum wear on AWS in my data center. So, you know, I can have you know, the Dell hardware with the Veum where code or I can have the Amazon hardware with the VM where code coming later this year without post. So that line between public in private is absolutely blurring. And where to my applications live, You know that that future of how fast is eight of us continue to grow? Absolutely. There are applications and data and things that will stay in my own data center and under my control. But that line is definitely blurring. And there's gonna be some re architectures. It's definitely still gonna take a couple of years to sort some of these things out. But we're at some of those inflection points where we'll see some of >> us. So I wrote a post its upon wicked bond kind of analyzing that video, and there's some interesting things that are unique. There's certainly a lot of goodness in there. Not some of the things they talk about are completely unique. Thio, aws. But things like Nitro and their special virtual ization engine and their special chip on Do you want to get a look at that? You take a look at that video and thence to New York City Summit this week. Um, we mentioned some of the innovations that we've seen up to date this year. A lot of talk I'm sure about the marketplace. >> Yeah, I'm wondering if there'll be any ripples, Dave, because the 1/2 of a chick you, too, was supposed to be in New York City. And now it's not, doesn't mean they don't have a strong presence in New York City like London and believe it's somewhere around 12 to 15,000 people. When I went to New York City two years ago was quite impressive. It is a free show, which means if your customer you get in for free. If you're a partner, of course, you're still paying for everything that goes there. But the regional summits are quite impressive and a great way to get in touch with Amazon and all that they're doing. If you don't want to go to the Super Bowl itself, which is, you know, 50,000 plus now in Las Vegas towards the end of the year. >> Yeah, these air, like many reinvents and they're actually quite good. A lot of a lot of practitioner focused on you're gonna you're gonna see that New York City >> did what I always love about every Amazon show I go to. There are customers that are interested learning new things. How can you do better with what I'm doing? But also, how can I change what I'm doing? How can I move forward? So even if it's not adopting the latest and greatest from AWS, the entire ecosystem is going there to meet with those customers and talk about digital transformation? Modern workforce? All of these hot trends definitely play out. Ground zero is the AWS. >> Yeah, and this is by design. As I said before, the pace of innovation is a challenge for people. It's an adoption blocker and so Amazon wants to educate and share the knowledge so that they can get more adoption. OK, stew. Thanks very much. Good luck. This week. Check out silicon angle dot com For all the news, the cube dot net is where the videos will live and watch. Do on John Ferrier and Corey Quinn. Live and check out the cuban dot com for all the research. Thanks for watching Everybody Day, Volonte and Stupid Event. We'll see you next time.
SUMMARY :
It's the cue. Uh, the N Y C Summit is coming up stew. And while you know, the horses on the track behind them are trying One of the fundamental assumptions they were making is eventually the law of large numbers of the market, going into verticals and going just really broad, really deep. the challenges. that came out of that when you talk to practitioners was their ability to keep up with the innovations that the planet with, you know, robotics and intelligence out there to help clean up pollution Amazon clearly is the front runner. How do I get to you know that business roll and put it in, is something that they should be able to do a better job. What came out of that show the big takeaway was was And so it's the second year we're doing And then, of course, reinvent will have two sets again that reinvent this year. You know, on the ground, you know, the ground truth as we that edge that we talked about get to hold another dimension, you know, off off the terra firma to attracting a lot of stories, but but outpost is starting to ship in beta form. This is the exact same rack that we have A lot of talk I'm sure about the marketplace. But the regional A lot of a lot the entire ecosystem is going there to meet with those customers and talk about digital transformation? Live and check out the cuban dot com for all the research.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Volonte | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Lovelock | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Schmidt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jennifer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
9,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Seattle | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave McCann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Davey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Corey Quinn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$30,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Southern California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
John Ferrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Robert Downey Jr | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Teresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
D. C | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Cory Quinn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight events | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Earth | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Stew Minuteman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
UK | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
D. C. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
U. K. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Eight productions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12. 13,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1,000,000 subscriptions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
a year later | DATE | 0.99+ |
19 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12,000 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Byron Cook, Amazon | AWS re:Inforce 2019
>> live from Boston, Massachusetts. It's the Cube covering A W s reinforce 2019 brought to you by Amazon Web service is and its ecosystem partners. >> Hey, welcome back, everyone to Cubes. Live coverage here in Boston, Massachusetts for eight of us reinforced Amazon Web service is inaugural event around Cloud Security. I'm Jeffrey Day Volante. Two days of coverage. We're winding down Day two. We're excited to have a year in The Cube Special guest, part of Big and that one of the big announcements. Well, I think it's big. Nerdy Announcement is the automated reasoning. Byron Cook, director of the Automated Reasoning Group within AWS. Again, this is part of the team that's gonna help figure out security use automation to augment humans. Great to have you on big part of show here. Thanks very much to explain the automated reasoning group. Verner Vogel had a great block post on All things distributed applies formal verification techniques in an innovative way to cloud security and compliance for our customers. For our own there's developers. What does that mean? Your math? >> Yeah, let me try. I'll give you one explanation, and if I puzzle, you all try to explain a different way. 300 So do you know the Pythagorean Theorem? Yeah, sure, Yeah. So? So that the path I agree in theory is about all triangles that was proved in approximately B. C. It's the proof is a finite description in logic as to why it's true and holds for all possible triangles. So we're basically using This same approach is to prove properties of policies of networks of programs, for example, crypto virtualization, the storage, et cetera. So we write software. This finds proofs in mathematics and this the proofs are the same as what you could found for thuggery and should apply into >> solve problems that become these mundane tasks of checking config files, making sure things are that worries kind of that's I'll give you an example. So so that's two in which is the T. L s implementation used, for example, in history. But the large majority >> of AWS has approximately 12,000 state holding elements, so that with if you include the stack of the heat usage, so the number >> of possible >> states it could reach us to to the 12,000. And if you wanted to show that the T. L s handshake Implementation is correct or the H Mac implementation is correct. Deterministic random bit generator implementation is correct, which is what we do using conventional methods like trying to run tests on it. So you would need, if you have, like, 1,000,000 has, well, microprocessors and you would need many more lifetimes in the sun is gonna admit light at 3.4 $4,000,000,000 a year to test to exhaustively test the system. So what we do is we rather than just running a bunch of inputs on the code, we we represent that as the mathematical system and then we use proof techniques, auto automatically search for a proof and with our tools, we in about 10 minutes or able to prove all those properties of s two in the way of your intimidates. And then we apply that to pieces of s three pieces of easy to virtual ization infrastructure on. Then, uh, what we've done is we've realized that customers had a lot of questions about their networks and their policies. So, for example, they have a complicated network worldwide different different availability zones, different regions on. They want to ask. Hey, does there exist away for this machine to connect to this other machine. Oh, are you know, to do all this all SS H traffic coming in that eventually gets to my Web server, go through a bastion host, which is the best, best practice. And then we can answer that question again, using logic. So we take the representation that semantics of easy to networking the policy, the network from the customer, and then the question we're asking, expressing logic. And we throw a big through their call ifthere improver, get the answer back. And then same for policy. >> So you're analyzing policies, >> policies, networks, programs, >> networks, connections. Yeah, right. And it to the tooling is sell cova. Eso >> eso eso basically way come with We come with an approach and then we have many tools that implement the approach on different, different problems. That's how you apply Volkova all underneath. It's all uses of a kind of tool called SMT inside. So there's a south's over, uh, proves theorems about formula and proposition. A logic and SMT is sat modular theories. Those tools can prove properties of problems expressed in first order logic. And so what we do is we take the, for example, if you have a question about your policies answering, answering semantic level questions about policies is actually a piece space problem. So that's harder than NP complete. We express the question in logic and then call the silvery and they get their answer back on Marshall it back. And that's what Volkova does. So that's calling a tool called CVC four, which is which is an open source. Prove er and we wenzel Koval. We take the policy three question encoded to logic. Call a Silver and Marshall answer back. >> What's the What's the root of this? I mean, presumably there's some academic research that was done. You guys were applying it for your specific use case, But can you share with this kind of He's the origination of this. >> So the first Impey complete problem was discovered by a cook and not not me. Another cook the early seventies on. So he proved that the proposition a ll satisfy ability problem is impeccably and meanwhile, there's been a lot of research from the sixties. So Davis and Putnam, for example, I think a paper from the mid sixties where they were, we're trying to answer the question of can we efficiently solved this NP complete problem proposition will satisfy ability on that. Researchers continue. There have been a bunch of breakthroughs, and so now we're really starting to see very from. There's a big breakthrough in 2001 on, then some and then some further breakthroughs in the 5 4008 range. So what we're seeing is that the solvers air getting better and better. So there's an international competition of Let's Save, usually about 30 silvers. And there's a study recently where they took all of the winners from this competition each year 2001 5 4008 30 2002 to 2011 and compared them on the same bench marks and hardware, and the 2002 silver is able to solve 1/4 of the benchmarks in the 2011 solved practically all of them and then the the 2019 silvers, or even better. Nowadays they can take problems and logic that have many tens of millions of variables and solve them very efficiently. So we're really using the power of those underlying solvers and marshaling the questions to those to those overs, codifying thinking math. And that's the math. The hour is you gave a talk in one sessions around provable security. Kind of the title proves provable. >> What's what is that? What is that? Intel. Can you just explain that concept and sure, in the top surfaces. So, uh, uh, >> so mathematical logic. You know, it's 2000 years old, right? So and has refined Sobule, for example, made logic less of a philosophical thing and more of a mathematical thing. Uh, and and then automated reasoning was sort of developed in the sixties, where you take algorithms and apply algorithms to find proofs and mathematical logic. And then provable security is the application of automated reasoning to questions and security and compliance. So we you wanna prove absence of memory, corruption errors and C code You won't approve termination of of event handling routines that are supposed to handle security events. All of those questions, their properties of your program. And you can use these tools to automatically or uh oh, our find proofs and then check The proofs have been found manually. That's what that's >> where approvable security fix. What was the makeup of the attendee list where people dropping this where people excited was all bunch of math geeks. You have a cross section of great security people here, and they're deep dive conversations Not like reinvent this show. This is really deep security. What was some of the feedback and makeup of the attendees? >> Give you two answers because I actually gave to talks. And the and the answers are a little bit different because the subject of the talk So there was one unprovable security, which was a basically the foundation of logic And how we how Cheers since Volkova and our program, because we also prove correctness of crypto and so on. So those tools and so that was largely a, uh uh, folks who had heard about it. And we're wanting to know more, and we're and we're going to know how we're using it and trying to learn there was a second talk, which was about the application of it to compliance. So that was with Tomic, Andrew, who is the CEO of Coal Fire, one of the third party auditors that AWS uses in a lot of customers used and also Chad Wolf, who's vice president of security, focused on compliance. And so the three of us spoke about how we're using it internally within eight of us to automate, >> uh, >> certification compliance, sort of a commission on. So that crowd was really interesting mixture of people interested in automated reasoning and people interested in compliance, which are two communities you wouldn't think normally hang together. But that's sort of like chocolate and peanut butter. It turns out to be a really great application, >> and they need to work together to, because it is the world. The action is they don't get stuck in the compliance and auditing fools engineering teams emerging with old school compliance nerds. So there's a really interesting, uh, sort of dynamic to proof that has a like the perfect use casing compliance. So the problem of like proving termination of programs is undecided ble proving problems and proposition a logic is np complete as all that sounds very hard, difficult and you use dearest six to solve this problem. But the thing is that once you've found a proof replaying, the proof is linear and size of the proof, so actually you could do extremely efficiently, and that has application and compliance. So one could imagine that you have, for example, PC I hip fed ramp. You have certain controls that you want to prove that the property like, for example, within a W s. We have a control that all data dressed must be encrypted. So we are using program verification tools, too. Show that of the code base. But now, once we've run that tool that constructs a proof like Euclid founded the sectarian serum that you can package up in a file hand to an auditor. And then a very simple, easy to understand third party open source tool could replay that proof. And so that becomes audit evidence. It's a scale of total examples >> wth e engineering problem. You're solving a security at scale. The business problem. You're solving it. Yeah. His customers are struggling. Just implementing There just >> aren't enough security professionals to hire right? So the old day is, the talk explains. It's out there all on YouTube's. The people watching the show can go check it out. But I am by the way I should I should make a plug for if you Google a W s provable security. There's a Web page on eight of us that has papers and videos and lots of information, so you might wanna check that out. I can't remember what I was answering now, but >> it's got links to the academic as >> well. Oh, yes. Oh, yes. That was the point that Tommy Kendra is pointing out, as in the old days, you would do an audit would come in to be a couple minutes box that we win this box. You check a few things to be a little network. Great. But now you have machines across the world, extremely complex networks, interaction between policies, networks, crypto, etcetera. And so there's There's no way a human or even a team of human could come in and have any reasonable chance of actually deeply understanding the system. So they just sort of check some stuff and then they call it success. And these tools really allow you to actually understand the entire system buyer and you guys doing some cutting edge work, >> folks watching and want to know how math translates into the real world with all your high school kids out their parents. This is stuff you learn in school like you could be played great work. I think I think this is cutting edge. I think math and the confidence of math intersects with groups. The compliance example audited example shows that world's gonna come together with math. I think this is a big mega trend. It's gonna not eliminate the human element. It's going augment that so great stuff, its final question just randomly. And while you're here, since your math guru we're always interested, we always covering our favorite topic of Blockchain, huh? We believe that a security conference is gonna soon have a Blockchain component because because of the mutability of it, there's a lot of math behind it. So as that starts to mature certainly Facebook entering him at their own currency. Whole nother conversation you don't want to have here is bring a lot of attention. So we see the intersection of security being a supply chain problem in the future. Your thoughts on that just generally. So So the problem of proving programs is undecided, and that means that you can't build a general solution. What you're gonna have to do is look >> for niche areas like device drivers, networks, policies, AP, I used to dream crypto et cetera, and then make the tools work for that area, and you will have to be comfortable with the idea that occasionally the tools aren't gonna be able to find an answer. And so the Amazon culture of being customer obsessed and working as closely as possible with the customer has been really helpful to my community of of logic, uh, full methods, practitioners, because they were really forced to work with a customer, understand the problem. So what I've been doing is listening to the customer on finding out what the problems with concerns. They are focusing my attention on that. And I haven't yet heard of, uh, of customers asking for mathematical proof on crypto currency Blockchain sorts of stuff. But I'm I I await further and you're intrigued. Yeah, I'm s I always like mathematics, but where we have been hearing customers asked for help is for Temple. We're working on free Our toss s o i o T applications Understand the networks that are connecting up the coyote to the cloud, understanding the correctness of machine learning. So why, why So I reused. I've done some machine learning. I've constructed a model. How do I know what it does? And is it compliant? Does it respect hip fed ramp PC, i et cetera, and some other issues like that. >> There's a lot of talk in the industry about quantum computing and creating nightmares for guys like you. How much thought given that you have any thing that you can share with us? >> Yes. Oh, there's there's work in the AWS crypto team preparing for the post quantum world. So imagine Adversary has quantum computer. And so there are proposals on eight of us has a number of proposals, and we've and those proposals have been implemented. So their standards and we've our team has been doing proof on the correctness of those. So, actually, in the one of my talks, I think the talk not with Chad and Tom. I show a demo of our work to prove the correctness of someplace quantum code. >> So, Byron, thank you for coming on the inside. Congratulations on the automated reason. Good to see it put in the practice and appreciate the commentary. Thank you very much. Thank you. Here for the first inaugural security cloud security event reinforced AWS is putting on cube coverage. I'm John Fairy with Day Volonte. Thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
A W s reinforce 2019 brought to you by Amazon Web service is part of Big and that one of the big announcements. So that the path I agree in theory is about all triangles that was proved in approximately kind of that's I'll give you an example. So you would need, if you have, like, And it to the tooling is And so what we do is we take the, for example, if you have a question about your policies answering, What's the What's the root of this? So the first Impey complete problem was discovered by a cook and in the top surfaces. So we you wanna prove absence What was the makeup of the attendee list where people dropping this where people excited was all bunch And so the three of us spoke about how we're using it internally within So that crowd was really interesting mixture of So one could imagine that you have, for example, The business problem. But I am by the way I should I should make a plug for if you Google a W s provable as in the old days, you would do an audit would come in to be a couple minutes box that we win this box. So So the problem of proving programs And so the Amazon culture of being customer obsessed and working as There's a lot of talk in the industry about quantum computing and creating nightmares So, actually, in the one of my Here for the first inaugural security cloud security event reinforced
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Byron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chad Wolf | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chad | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Byron Cook | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2001 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Coal Fire | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
2011 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Tommy Kendra | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andrew | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two communities | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey Day Volante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Davis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one explanation | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Volkova | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2002 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two answers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2000 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second talk | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.98+ |
one sessions | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Verner Vogel | PERSON | 0.98+ |
each year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Marshall | PERSON | 0.98+ |
3.4 $4,000,000,000 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
sixties | DATE | 0.97+ |
Putnam | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Tomic | PERSON | 0.97+ |
six | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
mid sixties | DATE | 0.97+ |
three pieces | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Automated Reasoning Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
John Fairy | PERSON | 0.95+ |
about 10 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
about 30 silvers | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Impey | PERSON | 0.94+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ | |
three question | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
early seventies | DATE | 0.93+ |
Amazon Web service | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
wenzel Koval | PERSON | 0.91+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
approximately 12,000 state | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
tens of millions of variables | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Amazon Web service | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
CVC four | TITLE | 0.74+ |
1/4 of | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.73+ |
eight of | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
Cube | TITLE | 0.72+ |
one unprovable | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
300 | OTHER | 0.71+ |
Day Volonte | PERSON | 0.7+ |
H Mac | TITLE | 0.69+ |
T. | TITLE | 0.64+ |
5 | OTHER | 0.61+ |
Let's | TITLE | 0.58+ |
Euclid | PERSON | 0.58+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
Temple | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
Cubes | ORGANIZATION | 0.53+ |
us | QUANTITY | 0.51+ |