Dell Technologies MWC 2023 Exclusive Booth Tour with David Nicholson
>> And I'm here at Dell's Presence at MWC with vice president of marketing for telecom and Edge Computing, Aaron Chaisson. Aaron, how's it going? >> Doing great. How's it going today, Dave? >> It's going pretty well. Pretty excited about what you've got going here and I'm looking forward to getting the tour. You ready to take a closer look? >> Ready to do it. Let's go take a look! For us in the telecom ecosystem, it's really all about how we bring together the different players that are innovating across the industry to drive value for our CSP customers. So, it starts really, for us, at the ecosystem layer, bringing partners, bringing telecommunication providers, bringing (stutters) a bunch of different technologies together to innovate together to drive new value. So Paul, take us a little bit through what we're doing to- to develop and bring in these partnerships and develop our ecosystem. >> Uh, sure. Thank you Aaron. Uh, you know, one of the things that we've been focusing on, you know, Dell is really working with many players in the open telecom ecosystem. Network equipment providers, independent software vendors, and the communication service providers. And, you know, through our lines of business or open telecom ecosystem labs, what we want to do is bring 'em together into a community with the goal of really being able to accelerate open innovation and, uh, open solutions into the market. And that's what this community is really about, is being able to, you know, have those communications, develop those collaborations whether it's through, you know, sharing information online, having webinars dedicated to sharing Dell information, whether it's our next generation hardware portfolio we announced here at the show, our use case directory, our- how we're dealing with new service opportunities, but as well as the community to share, too, which I think is an exciting way for us to be able to, you know- what is the knowledge thing? As well as activities at other events that we have coming up. So really the key thing I think about, the- the open telecom ecosystem community, it's collaboration and accelerating the open industry forward. >> So- So Aaron, if I'm hearing this correctly you're saying that you can't just say, "Hey, we're open", and throw a bunch of parts in a box and have it work? >> No, we've got to work together to integrate these pieces to be able to deliver value, and, you know, we opened up a- (stutters) in our open ecosystem labs, we started a- a self-certification process a couple of months back. We've already had 13 partners go through that, we've got 16 more in the pipeline. Everything you see in this entire booth has been innovated and worked with partnerships from Intel to Microsoft to, uh, to (stutters) Wind River and Red Hat and others. You go all the way around the booth, everything here has partnerships at its core. And why don't we go to the next section here where we're going to be showing how we're pulling that all together in our open ecosystems labs to drive that innovation? >> So Aaron, you talked about the kinds of validation and testing that goes on, so that you can prove out an open stack to deliver the same kinds of reliability and performance and availability that we expect from a wireless network. But in the opens- in the open world, uh, what are we looking at here? >> Yeah absolutely. So one of the- one of the challenges to a very big, broad open ecosystem is the complexity of integrating, deploying, and managing these, especially at telecom scale. You're not talking about thousands of servers in one site, you're talking about one server in thousands of sites. So how do you deploy that predictable stack and then also manage that at scale? I'm going to show you two places where we're talkin' about that. So, this is actually representing an area that we've been innovating in recently around creating an integrated infrastructure and virtualization stack for the telecom industry. We've been doing this for years in IT with VxBlocks and VxRails and others. Here what you see is we got, uh, Dell hardware infrastructure, we've got, uh, an open platform for virtualization providers, in this case we've created an infrastructure block for Red Hat to be able to supply an infrastructure for core operations and Packet Cores for telecoms. On the other side of this, you can actually see what we're doing with Wind River to drive innovation around RAN and being able to simplify RAN- vRAN and O-RAN deployments. >> What does that virtualization look like? Are we talking about, uh, traditional virtual machines with OSs, or is this containerized cloud native? What does it look like? >> Yeah, it's actually both, so it can support, uh, virtual, uh-uh, software as well as containerized software, so we leverage the (indistinct) distributions for these to be able to deploy, you know, cloud native applications, be able to modernize how they're deploying these applications across the telecom network. So in this case with Red Hat, uh, (stutters) leveraging OpenShift in order to support containerized apps in your Packet Core environments. >> So what are- what are some of the kinds of things that you can do once you have infrastructure like this deployed? >> Yeah, I mean by- by partnering broadly across the ecosystem with VMware, with Red Hat, uh, with- with Wind River and with others, it gives them the ability to be able to deploy the right virtualization software in their network for the types of applications they're deploying. They might want to use Red Hat in their core, they may want to use Wind River in their RAM, they may want to use, uh, Microsoft or VMware for their- for their Edge workloads, and we allow them to be able to deploy all those, but centrally manage those with a common user interface and a common set of APIs. >> Okay, well I'm dying to understand the link between this and the Lego city that the viewers can't see, yet, but it's behind me. Let's take a look. >> So let's take a look at the Lego city that shows how we not deploy just one of these, but dozens or hundreds of these at scale across a cityscape. >> So Aaron, I know we're not in Copenhagen. What's all the Lego about? >> Yeah, so the Lego city here is to show- and, uh, really there's multiple points of Presence across an entire Metro area that we want to be able to manage if we're a telecom provider. We just talked about one infrastructure block. What if I wanted to deploy dozens of these across the city to be able to manage my network, to be able to manage, uh, uh- to be able to deploy private mobility potentially out into a customer enterprise environment, and be able to manage all of these, uh, very simply and easily from a common interface? >> So it's interesting. Now I think I understand why you are VP of marketing for both telecom and Edge. Just heard- just heard a lot about Edge and I can imagine a lot of internet of things, things, hooked up at that Edge. >> Yeah, so why don't we actually go over to another area? We're actually going to show you how one small microbrewery (stutters) in one of our cities nearby, uh, (stutters) my hometown in Massachusetts is actually using this technology to go from more of an analyzed- analog world to digitizing their business to be able to brew better beer. >> So Aaron, you bring me to a brewery. What do we have- what do we have going on here? >> Yeah, so, actually (stutters) about- about a year ago or so, I- I was able to get my team to come together finally after COVID to be able to meet each other and have a nice team event. One of those nights, we went out to dinner at a- at a brewery called "Exhibit 'A'" in Massachusetts, and they actually gave us a tour of their facilities and showed us how they actually go through the process of brewing beer. What we saw as we were going through it, interestingly, was that everything was analog. They literally had people with pen and paper walking around checking time and temperature and the process of brewing the beer, and they weren't asking for help, but we actually saw an opportunity where what we're doing to help businesses digitize what they're doing in their manufacturing floor can actually help them optimize how they build whatever product they're building, in this case it was beer. >> Hey Warren, good to meet you! What do we have goin' on? >> Yeah, it's all right. So yeah, basically what we did is we took some of their assets in the, uh, brewery that were completely manually monitored. People were literally walking around the floor with clipboards, writing down values. And we censorized the asset, in this case fermentation tanks and we measured the, uh, pressure and the temperature, which in fermentation are very key to monitor those, because if they get out of range the entire batch of beer can go bad or you don't get the consistency from batch to batch if you don't tightly monitor those. So we censorized the fermentation tank, brought that into an industrial I/O network, and then brought that into a Dell gateway which is connected 5G up to the cloud, which then that data comes to a tablet or a phone, which they, rather than being out on the floor and monitor it, can look at this data remotely at any time. >> So I'm not sure the exact date, the first time we have evidence of beer being brewed by humanity... >> Yep. >> But I know it's thousands of years ago. So it's taken that long to get to the point where someone had to come along, namely Dell, to actually digitally transform the beer business. Is this sort of proof that if you can digitally transform this, you can digitally transform anything? >> Absolutely. You name it, anything that's being manufactured, sold, uh, uh, taken care of, (stutters) any business out there that's looking to be able to be modernize and deliver better service to their customers can benefit from technologies like this. >> So we've taken a look at the ecosystem, the way that you validate architectures, we've seen an example of that kind of open architecture. Now we've seen a real world use case. Do you want to take a look a little deeper under the covers and see what's powering all of this? >> We just this week announced a new line of servers that power Edge and RAN use cases, and I want to introduce Mike to kind of take us through what we've been working on and really what the power of what this providing. >> Hey Mike, welcome to theCube. >> Oh, glad- glad to be here. So, what I'd really like to talk about are the three new XR series servers that we just announced last week and we're showing here at Mobile World Congress. They are all short depth, ruggedized, uh, very environmentally tolerant, and able to withstand, you know, high temperatures, high humidities, and really be deployed to places where traditional data center servers just can't handle, you know, due to one fact or another, whether it's depth or the temperature. And so, the first one I'd like to show you is the XR7620. This is, uh, 450 millimeters deep, it's designed for, uh, high levels of acceleration so it can support up to 2-300 watt, uh, GPUs. But what I really want to show you over here, especially for Mobile World Congress, is our new XR8000. The XR8000 is based on Intel's latest Sapphire Rapids technology, and this is- happens to be one of the first, uh, EE boost processors that is out, and basically what it is (stutters) an embedded accelerator that makes, uh, the- the processing of vRAN loads very, uh, very efficient. And so they're actually projecting a, uh, 3x improvement, uh, of processing per watt over the previous generation of processors. This particular unit is also sledded. It's very much like, uh, today's traditional baseband unit, so it's something that is designed for low TCO and easy maintenance in the field. This is the frew. When anything fails, you'll pull one out, you pop a new one in, it comes back into service, and the- the, uh, you know, your radio is- is, uh, minimally disrupted. >> Yeah, would you describe this as quantitative and qualitative in terms of the kinds of performance gains that these underlying units are delivering to us? I mean, this really kind of changes the game, doesn't it? It's not just about more, is it about different also in terms of what we can do? >> Well we are (stutters) to his point, we are able to bring in new accelerator technologies. Not only are we doing it with the Intel, uh, uh, uh, of the vRAN boost technologies, but also (stutters) we can bring it, too, but there's another booth here where we're actually working with our own accelerator cards and other accelerator cards from our partners across the industry to be able to deliver the price and performance capabilities required by a vRAN or an O-RAN deployment in the network. So it's not- it's not just the chip technology, it's the integration and the innovation we're doing with others, as well as, of course, the unique power cooling capabilities that Dell provides in our servers that really makes these the most efficient way of being able to power a network. >> Any final thoughts recapping the whole picture here? >> Yeah, I mean I would just say if anybody's, uh, i- is still here in Mobile World Congress, wants to come and learn what we're doing, I only showed you a small section of the demos we've got here. We've got 13 demos across on 8th floor here. Uh, for those of you who want to talk to us (stutters) and have meetings with us, we've got 13 meeting rooms back there, over 500 costumer partner meetings this week, we've got some whisper suites for those of you who want to come and talk to us but we're innovating on going forward. So, you know, there's a lot that we're doing, we're really excited, there's a ton of passion at this event, and, uh, we're really excited about where the industry is going and our role in it. >> 'Preciate the tour, Aaron. Thanks Mike. >> Mike: Thank you! >> Well, for theCube... Again, Dave Nicholson here. Thanks for joining us on this tour of Dell's Presence here at MWC 2023.
SUMMARY :
with vice president of marketing for it going today, Dave? to getting the tour. the industry to drive value and the communication service providers. to be able to deliver value, and availability that we one of the challenges to a to be able to deploy, you know, the ecosystem with and the Lego city that the the Lego city that shows how What's all the Lego about? Yeah, so the Lego city here is to show- think I understand why you are to be able to brew better beer. So Aaron, you bring me to and temperature and the process to batch if you don't So I'm not sure the to get to the point that's looking to be able to the way that you validate architectures, to kind of take us through and really be deployed to the industry to be able to come and talk to us but we're 'Preciate the tour, Aaron. Thanks for joining us on this
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Aaron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aaron Chaisson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Copenhagen | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Warren | PERSON | 0.99+ |
13 partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
David Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
13 demos | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
450 millimeters | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
two places | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
XR7620 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
one site | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
XR8000 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
dozens | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lego | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
8th floor | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
13 meeting rooms | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
thousands of years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
thousands of servers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
OpenShift | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Red Hat | TITLE | 0.97+ |
one server | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
3x | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Red Hat | TITLE | 0.96+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.95+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.93+ |
16 more | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.92+ |
over 500 costumer partner meetings | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
dozens of these | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
MWC 2023 | EVENT | 0.88+ |
thousands of sites | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
about a year ago | DATE | 0.87+ |
Sapphire Rapids | OTHER | 0.87+ |
RAN- vRAN | TITLE | 0.87+ |
one small microbrewery | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Edge Computing | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Wind River | TITLE | 0.83+ |
one infrastructure block | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
up to 2-300 watt | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
RAN | TITLE | 0.81+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
Andy Sheahen, Dell Technologies & Marc Rouanne, DISH Wireless | MWC Barcelona 2023
>> (Narrator) The CUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding by Dell Technologies. Creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat music) >> Welcome back to Fira Barcelona. It's theCUBE live at MWC23 our third day of coverage of this great, huge event continues. Lisa Martin and Dave Nicholson here. We've got Dell and Dish here, we are going to be talking about what they're doing together. Andy Sheahen joins as global director of Telecom Cloud Core and Next Gen Ops at Dell. And Marc Rouanne, one of our alumni is back, EVP and Chief Network Officer at Dish Wireless. Welcome guys. >> Great to be here. >> (Both) Thank you. >> (Lisa) Great to have you. Mark, talk to us about what's going on at Dish wireless. Give us the update. >> Yeah so we've built a network from scratch in the US, that covered the US, we use a cloud base Cloud native, so from the bottom of the tower all the way to the internet uses cloud distributed cloud, emits it, so there are a lot of things about that. But it's unique, and now it's working, so we're starting to play with it and that's pretty cool. >> What's some of the proof points, proof in the pudding? >> Well, for us, first of all it was to do basic voice and data on a smartphone and for me the success would that you won't see the difference for a smartphone. That's base line. the next step is bringing this to the enterprise for their use case. So we've covered- now we have services for smartphones. We use our brand, Boost brand, and we are distributing that across the US. But as I said, the real good stuff is when you start to making you know the machines and all the data and the applications for the enterprise. >> Andy, how is Dell a facilitator of what Marc just described and the use cases and what their able to deliver? >> We're providing a number of the servers that are being used out in their radio access network. The virtual DU servers, we're also providing some bare metal orchestration capabilities to help automate the process of deploying all these hundreds and thousands of nodes out in the field. Both of these, the servers and the bare metal orchestra product are things that we developed in concert with Dish, working together to understand the way, the best way to automate, based on the tooling their using in other parts of their network, and we've been with you guys since day one, really. >> (Marc) Absolutely, yeah. >> Making each others solutions better the whole way. >> Marc, why Dell? >> So, the way the networks work is you have a cloud, and you have a distributed edge you need someone who understands the diversity of the edge in order to bring the cloud software to the edge, and Dell is the best there, you know, you can, we can ask them to mix and match accelerators, processors memory, it's very diverse distributed edge. We are building twenty thousands sides so you imagine the size and the complexity and Dell was the right partner for that. >> (Andy) Thank you. >> So you mentioned addressing enterprise leads, which is interesting because there's nothing that would prevent you from going after consumer wireless technically, right but it sounds like you have taken a look at the market and said "we're going to go after this segment of the market." >> (Marc) Yeah. >> At least for now. Are there significant differences between what an enterprise expects from a 5G network than, verses a consumer? >> Yeah. >> (Dave) They have higher expectations, maybe, number one I guess is, if my bill is 150 dollars a month I can have certain levels of expectations whereas a large enterprise the may be making a much more significant investment, are their expectations greater? >> (Marc) Yeah. >> Do you have a higher bar to get over? >> So first, I mean first we use our network for consumers, but for us it's an enterprise. That's the consumer segment, an enterprise. So we expose the network like we would to a car manufacturer, or to a distributor of goods of food and beverage. But what you expect when you are an enterprise, you expect, manage your services. You expect to control the goodness of your services, and for this you need to observe what's happening. Are you delivering the right service? What is the feedback from the enterprise users, and that's what we call the observability. We have a data centric network, so our enterprises are saying "Yeah connecting is enough, but show us how it works, and show us how we can learn from the data, improve, improve, and become more competitive." That's the big difference. >> So what you say Marc, are some of the outcomes you achieved working with Dell? TCO, ROI, CapX, OpX, what are some of the outcomes so far, that you've been able to accomplish? >> Yeah, so obviously we don't share our numbers, but we're very competitive. Both on the CapX and the OpX. And the second thing is that we are much faster in terms of innovation, you know one of the things that Telecorp would not do, was to tap into the IT industry. So we access to the silicon and we have access to the software and at a scale that none of the Telecorp could ever do and for us it's like "wow" and it's a very powerful industry and we've been driving the consist- it's a bit technical but all the silicone, the accelerators, the processors, the GPU, the TPUs and it's like wow. It's really a transformation. >> Andy, is there anything anagallis that you've dealt with in the past to the situation where you have this true core edge, environment where you have to instrument the devices that you provide to give that level of observation or observability, whatever the new word is, that we've invented for that. >> Yeah, yeah. >> I mean has there, is there anything- >> Yeah absolutely. >> Is this unprecedented? >> No, no not at all. I mean Dell's been really working at the edge since before the edge was called the edge right, we've been selling, our hardware and infrastructure out to retail shops, branch office locations, you know just smaller form factors outside of data centers for a very long time and so that's sort of the consistency from what we've been doing for 30 years to now the difference is the volume, the different number of permutations as Marc was saying. The different type of accelerator cards, the different SKUS of different server types, the sheer volume of nodes that you have in a nationwide wireless network. So the volumes are much different, the amount of data is much different, but the process is really the same. It's about having the infrastructure in the right place at the right time and being able to understand if it's working well or if it's not and it's not just about a red light or a green light but healthy and unhealthy conditions and predicting when the red lights going to come on. And we've been doing that for a while it's just a different scale, and a different level of complexity when you're trying to piece together all these different components from different vendors. >> So we talk a lot about ecosystem, and sometimes because of the desire to talk about the outcomes and what the end users, customers, really care about sometimes we will stop at the layer where say a Dell lives, and we'll see that as the sum total of the component when really, when you talk about a server that Dish is using that in and of itself is an ecosystem >> Yep, yeah >> (Dave) or there's an ecosystem behind it you just mentioned it, the kinds of components and the choices that you make when you optimize these devices determine how much value Dish, >> (Andy) Absolutely. >> Can get out of that. How deep are you on that hardware? I'm a knuckle dragging hardware guy. >> Deep, very deep, I mean just the number of permutations that were working through with Dish and other operators as well, different accelerator cards that we talked about, different techniques for timing obviously there's different SKUs with the silicon itself, different chip sets, different chips from different providers, all those things have to come together, and we build the basic foundation and then we also started working with our cloud partners Red Hat, Wind River, all these guys, VM Ware, of course and that's the next layer up, so you've got all the different hardware components, you've got the extraction layer, with your virtualization layer and or ubernetise layer and all of that stuff together has to be managed compatibility matrices that get very deep and very big, very quickly and that's really the foundational challenge we think of open ran is thinking all these different pieces are going to fit together and not just work today but work everyday as everything gets updated much more frequently than in the legacy world. >> So you care about those things, so we don't have to. >> That's right. >> That's the beauty of it. >> Yes. >> Well thank you. (laughter) >> You're welcome. >> I want to understand, you know some of the things that we've been talking about, every company is a data company, regardless of whether it's telco, it's a retailer, if it's my bank, it's my grocery store and they have to be able to use data as quickly as possible to make decisions. One of the things they've been talking here is the monetization of data, the monetization of the network. How do you, how does Dell help, like a Dish be able to achieve the monetization of their data. >> Well as Marc was saying before the enterprise use cases are what we are all kind of betting on for 5G, right? And enterprises expect to have access to data and to telemetry to do whatever use cases they want to execute in their particular industry, so you know, if it's a health care provider, if it's a factory, an agricultural provider that's leveraging this network, they need to get the data from the network, from the devices, they need to correlate it, in order to do things like automatically turn on a watering system at a certain time, right, they need to know the weather around make sure it's not too windy and you're going to waste a lot of water. All that has data, it's going to leverage data from the network, it's going to leverage data from devices, it's going to leverage data from applications and that's data that can be monetized. When you have all that data and it's all correlated there's value, inherit to it and you can even go onto a forward looking state where you can intelligently move workloads around, based on the data. Based on the clarity of the traffic of the network, where is the right place to put it, and even based on current pricing for things like on demand insists from cloud providers. So having all that data correlated allows any enterprise to make an intelligent decision about how to move a workload around a network and get the most efficient placing of that workload. >> Marc, Andy mentions things like data and networks and moving data across the networks. You have on your business card, Chief Network Officer, what potentially either keeps you up at night in terror or gets you very excited about the future of your network? What's out there in the frontier and what are those key obstacles that have to be overcome that you work with? >> Yeah, I think we have the network, we have the baseline, but we don't yet have the consumption that is easy by the enterprise, you know an enterprise likes to say "I have 4K camera, I connect it to my software." Click, click, right? And that's where we need to be so we're talking about it APIs that are so simple that they become a click and we engineers we have a tendency to want to explain but we should not, it should become a click. You know, and the phone revolution with the apps became those clicks, we have to do the same for the enterprise, for video, for surveillance, for analytics, it has to be clicks. >> While balancing flexibility, and agility of course because you know the folks who were fans of CLIs come in light interfaces, who hate gooeys it's because they feel they have the ability to go down to another level, so obviously that's a balancing act. >> But that's our job. >> Yeah. >> Our job is to hide the complexity, but of course there is complexity. It's like in the cloud, an emprise scaler, they manage complex things but it's successful if they hide it. >> (Dave) Yeah. >> It's the same. You know we have to be emprise scaler of connectivity but hide it. >> Yeah. >> So that people connect everything, right? >> Well it's Andy's servers, we're all magicians hiding it all. >> Yeah. >> It really is. >> It's like don't worry about it, just know, >> Let us do it. >> Sit down, we will serve you the meal. Don't worry how it's cooked. >> That's right, the enterprises want the outcome. >> (Dave) Yeah. >> They don't want to deal with that bottom layer. But it is tremendously complex and we want to take that on and make it better for the industry. >> That's critical. Marc I'd love to go back to you and just I know that you've been in telco for such a long time and here we are day three of MWC the name changed this year, from Mobile World Congress, reflecting mobilism isn't the only thing, obviously it was the catalyst, but what some of the things that you've heard at the event, maybe seen at the event that give you the confidence that the right players are here to help move Dish wireless forward, for example. >> You know this is the first, I've been here for decades it's the first time, and I'm a Chief Network Officer, first time we don't talk about the network. >> (Andy) Yeah. >> Isn't that surprising? People don't tell me about speed, or latency, they talk about consumption. Apps, you know videos surveillance, or analytics or it's, so I love that, because now we're starting to talk about how we can consume and monetize but that's the first time. We use to talk about gigabytes and this and that, none of that not once. >> What does that signify to you, in terms of the evolution? >> Well you know, we've seen that the demand for the healthcare, for the smart cities, has been here for a decade, proof of concepts for a decade but the consumption has been behind and for me this is the oldest team is waking up to we are going to make it easy, so that the consumption can take off. The demand is there, we have to serve it. And the fact that people are starting to say we hide the complexity that's our problem, but don't even mention it, I love it. >> Yep. Drop the mic. >> (Andy and Marc) Yeah, yeah. >> Andy last question for you, some of the things we know Dell has a big and verging presents in telco, we've had a chance to see the booth, see the cool things you guys are featuring there, Dave did a great tour of it, talk about some of the things you've heard and maybe even from customers at this event that demonstrate to you that Dell is going in the right direction with it's telco strategy. >> Yeah, I mean personally for me this has been an unbelievable event for Dell we've had tons and tons of customer meetings of course and the feedback we're getting is that the things we're bring to market whether it's infrablocks, or purposeful servers that are designed for the telecom network are what our customers need and have always wanted. We get a lot of wows, right? >> (Lisa) That's nice. >> "Wow we didn't know Dell was doing this, we had no idea." And the other part of it is that not everybody was sure that we were going to move as fast as we have so the speed in which we've been able to bring some of these things to market and part of that was working with Dish, you know a pioneer, to make sure we were building the right things and I think a lot of the customers that we talked to really appreciate the fact that we're doing it with the industry, >> (Lisa) Yeah. >> You know, not at the industry and that comes across in the way they are responding and what their talking to us about now. >> And that came across in the interview that you just did. Thank you both for joining Dave and me. >> Thank you >> Talking about what Dell and Dish are doing together the proof is in the pudding, and you did a great job at explaining that, thanks guys, we appreciate it. >> Thank you. >> All right, our pleasure. For our guest and for Dave Nicholson, I'm Lisa Martin, you're watching theCUBE live from MWC 23 day three. We will be back with our next guest, so don't go anywhere. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. we are going to be talking about Mark, talk to us about what's that covered the US, we use a cloud base and all the data and the and the bare metal orchestra product solutions better the whole way. and Dell is the best at the market and said between what an enterprise and for this you need to but all the silicone, the instrument the devices and so that's sort of the consistency from deep are you on that hardware? and that's the next So you care about those Well thank you. One of the things and get the most efficient the future of your network? You know, and the phone and agility of course It's like in the cloud, an emprise scaler, It's the same. Well it's Andy's Sit down, we will serve you the meal. That's right, the and make it better for the industry. that the right players are here to help it's the first time, and but that's the first easy, so that the consumption some of the things we know and the feedback we're getting is that so the speed in which You know, not at the industry And that came across in the the proof is in the pudding, We will be back with our next
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Marc Rouanne | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Marc | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Sheahen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telecorp | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mark | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dish | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
DISH Wireless | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Dish wireless | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.98+ |
MWC | EVENT | 0.98+ |
third day | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Next Gen Ops | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
TCO | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Dish Wireless | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
CapX | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
Boost | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
150 dollars a month | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
OpX | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Telecom Cloud Core | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
ROI | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
tons and tons of customer | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Abdullah Abuzaid, Dell Technologies & Gil Hellmann, Wind River | MWC Barcelona 2023
(intro music) >> Narrator: "theCUBE's" live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies, creating technologies that drive human progress. (gentle music) >> Hey everyone, welcome back to "theCUBE," the leader in live and emerging tech coverage. As you well know, we are live at MWC23 in Barcelona, Spain. Lisa Martin with Dave Nicholson. Day three of our coverage, as you know, 'cause you've been watching the first two days. A lot of conversations about ecosystem, a lot about disruption in the telco industry. We're going to be talking about Open RAN. You've heard some of those great conversations, the complexities, the opportunities. Two guests join Dave and me. Abdullah Abuzaid, Technical Product Manager at Dell, and Gil Hellmann, VP Telecom Solutions Engineering and Architecture at Wind River. Welcome to the program guys. >> Thank you. >> Nice to be here. >> Let's talk a little bit about Dell and Wind River. We'll each ask you both the same question, and talk to us about how you're working together to really address the complexities that organizations are having when they're considering moving from a closed environment to an open environment. >> Definitely. Thank you for hosting us. By end of the day, the relationship between Dell and Wind River is not a new. We've been collaborating in the open ecosystem for long a time enough. And that's one of the, our partnership is a result of this collaboration where we've been trying to make more efficient operation in the ecosystem. The open environment ecosystem, it has the plus and a concern. The plus of simplicity, choice of multiple vendors, and then the concern of complexity managing these vendors. Especially if we look at examples for the Open RAN ecosystem, dealing with multiple vendors, trying to align them. It bring a lot of operational complexity and TCO challenges for our customers, from this outcome where we build our partnership with Wind River in order to help our customer to simplify, or run deployment, operation, and lifecycle management and sustain it. >> And who are the customers, by the way? >> Mainly the CSP customers who are targeting Open RAN and Virtual RAN deployments. That digital transformation moving towards unified cloud environment, or a seamless cloud experience from Core to RAN, these are the customers we are working with them. >> You'll give us your perspective, your thoughts on the partnership, and the capabilities that you're enabling, the CSPs with that. >> Sure. It's actually started last year here in Barcelona, when we set together, and started to look at the, you know, the industry, the adoption of Open RAN, and the challenges. And Open RAN brings a lot of possibilities and benefit, but it does bring a lot of challenges of reintegrating what you desegregate. In the past, you purchase everything from one vendor, they provide the whole solution. Now you open it, you have different layers. So if you're looking at Open RAN, you have, I like to look at it as three major layers, the management, application, and the infrastructure. And we're starting to look what are the challenges. And the challenges of integration, of complexity, knowledge that operator has with cloud infrastructure. And this is where we basically, Dell and Winder River set together and say, "How can we ease this? "How we can make it simpler?" And we decided to partner and bring a joint infrastructure solution to market, that's not only integrated at a lab at the factory level, but it basically comes with complete lifecycle management from the day zero deployment, through the day two operation, everything done through location, through Dell supported, working out of the box. So basically taking this whole infrastructure layer integration pain out, de-risking everything, and then continuing from there to work with the ecosystem vendor to reintegrate, validate the application, on top of this infrastructure. >> So what is the, what is the Wind River secret sauce in this, in this mix, for folks who aren't familiar with what Wind River does? >> Yes, absolutely. So Wind River, for many, many don't know, we're in business since 1981. So over 40 years. We specialize high performance, high reliability infrastructure. We touch every aspect of your day and your life. From the airplane that you fly, the cars, the medical equipment. And if we go into the telco, most of the telco equipment that it's not virtualized, not throughout the fight today, using our operating system. So from all the leading equipment manufacturers and even the smaller one. And as the world started to go into desegregation in cloud, Wind River started to look at this and say, "Okay, everything is evolving. Instead of a device that included the application, the hardware, everything fused together, it's now being decomposed. So instead of providing the operating environment to develop and deploy the application to the device manufacturer, now we're providing it basically to build the cloud. So to oversimplify, I call it a cloud OS, okay. It's a lot more than OS, it's an operating environment. But we took basically our experience, the same experience that, you know, we used in all those years with the telco equipment manufacturer, and brought it into the cloud. So we're basically providing solution to build an on-premises scalable cloud from the core all the way to the far edge, that doesn't compromise reliability, doesn't compromise performance, and address all the telco needs. >> So I, Abdullah, maybe you can a answer this. >> Yeah. >> What is the, what does the go-to-market motion look like, considering that you have two separate companies that can address customers directly, separately. What does that, what does that look like if you're approaching a possible customer who is, who's knocking on the door? >> How does that work? >> Exactly. And this effort is a Dell turnkey sales service offering, or solution offering to our customers. Where Dell, in collaboration with Wind River, we proactively validate, integrate, and productize the solution as engineered system, knock door on our customer who are trying to transform to Open RAN or open ecosystem. We can help you to go through that seamless experience, by pre-validating with whatever workload you want to introduce, enable zero touch provisioning, and during the day one deployment, and ensure we have sustainable lifecycle management throughout the lifecycle of the product in, in operate, in operational network, as well as having a unified single call of support from Dell side. >> Okay. So I was just going to ask you about support. So I'm a CSP, I have the solution, I go to Dell for support. >> Exactly. >> Okay. So start with Dell, and level one, level two. And if there are complex issues related to the cloud core itself, then Wind River will be on our back supporting us. >> Talk a little bit about a cust, a CSP example that is, is using the technology, and some of the outcomes that they're able to achieve. I'd love to get both of your perspectives on that. >> Vodafone is a great example. We're here in Barcelona. Vodafone is the first ora network in Europe, and it's using our joint solution. >> What are some of the, the outcomes that it's helping them to achieve? >> Faster time to market. As you see, they already started to deploy the ORAN in commercial network, and very successful in the trials that they did last year. We're also not stopping there. We're evolving, working with them together to improve like stuff around energy efficiency. So continue to optimize. So the outcome, it's just simplifying it, and you know, ready to go. Using experience that we have, Wind River is powering the first basically virtualized RAN 5G network in the world. This is with Verizon. We're at the very large scale. We started this deployment in late '20 and '19, the first site. And then through 2020 to 2022, we basically rolled in large scale. We have a lot of experience learning from it, which what we brought into the table when we partnered with Dell. A lot of experience from how you deploy at scale. Many sites from a central location, updates, upgrade. So the whole day two operation, and this is coming to bearing the solution that basically Vodafone is deploying now, and which allowed them... If I, if I look at my engagement with Verizon, started years before we started. And it took quite some time until we got stuff running. And if you look at the Vodafone time schedule, was significantly compressed compared to the Verizon first deployment. And I can tell you that there are other service providers that were announced here by KDI, for example. It's another one moving even faster. So it's accelerating the whole movement to Ora. >> We've heard a lot of acceleration talk this week. I'd love to get your perspective, Abdullah, talking about, you know, you, you just mentioned two huge names in Telco, Vodafone and Verizon. >> Yep. >> Talk a little bit about Dell's commitment to helping telecommunications companies really advance, accelerate innovation so that all of us on the other end have this thing that just works wherever we are 24 by 7. >> Not exactly. And this, we go back to the challenges in Open ecosystem. Managing multiple vendors at the same time, is a challenge for our customers. And that's why we are trying to simplify their life cycle by have, by being a trusted partner, working with our customer through all the journey. We started with Dish in their 5G deployment. Also with Vodafone. We're finding the right partners working with them proactively before getting into, in front of the customer to, we've done our homework, we are ready to simplify the process for you to go for it. If you look at the RAN in particular, we are talking with the 5g. We have ran the simplification, but they still have on the other side, limited resources and skillset can support it. So, bringing a pro, ahead of time engineer system, with a zero touch of provisioning enablement, and sustainable life cycle management, it lead to the faster time to market deployment, TCO savings, improved margins for our customers, and faster business revenue for their end users. >> Solid outcomes. >> And, and what you just just described, justifies the pain associated with disaggregating and reintegrating, which is the way that Gill referenced it, which I think is great because you're not, you're not, you're not re-aggregating, (laughs) you're reintegrating, and you're creating something that's better. >> Exactly. >> Moving forward. Otherwise, why would you do it? >> Exactly. And if you look at it, the player in the ecosystem, you have the vendors, you have the service integrators, you have the automation enablers, but kind of they are talking in silos. Everyone, this is my raci, this is what I'm responsible for. I, I'm not able, I don't want to get into something else while we are going the extra mile by working proactively in that ecosystem to... Let's bring brains together, find out what's one plus one can bring three for our customers, so we make it end-to-end seamless experience, not only on the technical part, but also on the business aspect side of it. >> So, so the partnership, it's about reducing the pen. I will say eliminating it. So this is the, the core of it. And you mentioned getting better coverage for your phone. I do want to point out that the phones are great, but if you look at the premises of a 5G network, it's to enable a lot more things that will touch your life that are beyond the consumer and the phone. Stuff like connected vehicles. So for example, something as simple as collision avoidance, the ability for the car that goes in front of you to be able to see what's happening and broadcast this information to the car behind that have no ability to see it. And basically affect our life in a way that makes our driving safer. And for this, you need a ultra low, reliable low latency communication. You need a 5G network. >> I'm glad you brought that up, because you know, we think about, "Well we just have to be connected all the time." But those are some of the emerging technologies that are going to be potentially lifesaving, and, and really life transforming that you guys are helping to enable. So, really great stuff there, but so much promise coming down the road. What's next for Dell and Wind River? And, and when you're in conversations with prospective CSP's, what is the superpower that you deliver together? I'd love to get both of your perspectives. >> So, if you look at it, number one, customers look at it, last savings and their day-to-day operation. In 5G nature, we are talking the introduction of ORAN. This is still picking up. But there is a mutualization and densification of ORAN. And this is where we're talking on monetizing my deployment. Then the third phase, we're talking sustainability and advanced service introduction. Where I want to move not only ORAN, I want to bring the edge at the same side, I want to define the advanced use cases of edge, where it enables me with this pre-work being done to deliver more services and better SLA services. By end of the day, 5G as a girl mentioned earlier, is not about a good better phone coverage, or a better speed robot, but what customized SLA's I can deliver. So it enables me to deliver different business streams to my end users. >> Yeah. >> So yeah. I will say there are two pens. One, it's the technology side. So for an example, energy efficiency. It's a very big pin point. And sustainability. So we work a lot around this, and basically to advance this. So if you look at the integrated solution today, it's very highly optimized for resource consumption. But to be able to more dynamically be able to change your power profile without compromising the SLA. So this is one side. The other side, it's about all those applications that will come to the 5G network to make our life better. It's about integrating, validating, certifying those applications. So, it's not just easy to deploy an ORAN network, but it's easy to deploy those applications. >> I'd be curious to get your perspective on the question of ROI in this, in this space. Specifically with the sort of the macro headwinds (clears throat) the economies of the world are facing right now, if you accept that. What does the ROI timeline look like when you're talking about moving towards ORAN, adopting VRAN, an amazing, you know, a plethora of new services that can be delivered, but will these operators have the appetite to take that, make that investment and take on that risk based upon the ROI time horizon? Any thoughts on that? >> Yeah. So if you look at the early days or ORAN introduction in particular, most of the entrepreneurs of ORAN and Virtual RAN ran into the challenges of not only the complexity of open ecosystem, but the integration, is like the redos of the work. And that's where we are trying to address it via pre-engineered system or building an engineer system proactively before getting it to the customers. Per our result or outcomes we get, we are talking about 30 to 50% savings on the optics. We are talking 110 ROI for our customers, simply because we are reducing the redos, the time spent to discover and explore. Because we've done that rework ahead of time, we found the optimization issues. Just for example, any customer can buy the same components from any multiple vendors, but how I can bring them together and give, deliver for me the best performance that I can fully utilize, that's, that's where it brings the value for our customer, and accelerate the deployment and the operation of the network. >> Do you have anything to add before we close in the next 30 seconds? >> Yeah. Yeah. (laughs) >> Absolutely. I would say, we start to see the data coming from two years of operation at scale. And the data supports performance. It's the same or better than traditional system. And the cost of operation, it's as good or better than traditional. Unfortunately, I can't provide more specific data. But the point is, when something is unknown in the beginning, of course you're more afraid, you take more conservative approach. Now the data starts to flow. And from here, the intention needs to go even better. So more efficiency, so cost less than traditional system, both to operate as well as to build up. But it's definitely the data that we have today says, the, ORAN system is at part, at the minimum. >> So, definite ROI there. Guys, thank you so much for joining Dave and me talking about how you're helping organizations not just address the complexities of moving from close to open, but to your point, eliminating them. We appreciate your time and, and your insights. >> Thank you. >> All right. For our guests and for Dave Nicholson, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching "theCUBE," the leader in live and emerging tech coverage. Live from MWC23. We'll be back after a short break. (outro music)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. in the telco industry. and talk to us about how By end of the day, Mainly the CSP and the capabilities that you're enabling, In the past, you purchase From the airplane that you fly, the cars, you can a answer this. considering that you have and during the day one deployment, So I'm a CSP, I have the solution, issues related to the and some of the outcomes Vodafone is the first and this is coming to bearing the solution I'd love to get your Dell's commitment to helping front of the customer to, justifies the pain associated with Otherwise, why would you do it? but also on the business that are beyond the but so much promise coming down the road. By end of the day, 5G as and basically to advance this. of the macro headwinds the time spent to discover and explore. (laughs) Now the data starts to flow. not just address the the leader in live and
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Abdullah Abuzaid | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Abdullah | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gil Hellmann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
110 ROI | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Two guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1981 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Winder River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first site | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two pens | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 40 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
KDI | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gill | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Open RAN | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Barcelona, Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
late '20 | DATE | 0.99+ |
24 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
third phase | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
7 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first two days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one vendor | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two separate companies | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Open RAN | TITLE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one side | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first deployment | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three major layers | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
tel | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Day three | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Dish | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
'19 | DATE | 0.95+ |
ORAN | TITLE | 0.95+ |
Peter Fetterolf, ACG Business Analytics & Charles Tsai, Dell Technologies | MWC Barcelona 2023
>> Narrator: TheCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies. Creating technologies that drive human progress. (light airy music) >> Hi, everybody, welcome back to the Fira in Barcelona. My name is Dave Vellante. I'm here with my co-host Dave Nicholson. Lisa Martin is in the house. John Furrier is pounding the news from our Palo Alto studio. We are super excited to be talking about cloud at the edge, what that means. Charles Tsai is here. He's the Senior Director of product management at Dell Technologies and Peter Fetterolf is the Chief Technology Officer at ACG Business Analytics, a firm that goes deep into the TCO and the telco space, among other things. Gents, welcome to theCUBE. Thanks for coming on. Thank you. >> Good to be here. >> Yeah, good to be here. >> So I've been in search all week of the elusive next wave of monetization for the telcos. We know they make great money on connectivity, they're really good at that. But they're all talking about how they can't let this happen again. Meaning we can't let the over the top vendors yet again, basically steal our cookies. So we're going to not mess it up this time. We're going to win in the monetization. Charles, where are those monetization opportunities? Obviously at the edge, the telco cloud at the edge. What is that all about and where's the money? >> Well, Dave, I think from a Dell's perspective, what we want to be able to enable operators is a solution that enable them to roll out services much quicker, right? We know there's a lot of innovation around IoT, MEG and so on and so forth, but they continue to rely on traditional technology and way of operations is going to take them years to enable new services. So what Dell is doing is now, creating the entire vertical stack from the hardware through CAST and automation that enable them, not only to push out services very quickly, but operating them using cloud principles. >> So it's when you say the entire vertical stack, it's the integrated hardware components with like, for example, Red Hat on top- >> Right. >> Or a Wind River? >> That's correct. >> Okay, and then open API, so the developers can create workloads, I presume data companies. We just had a data conversation 'cause that was part of the original stack- >> That's correct. >> So through an open ecosystem, you can actually sort of recreate that value, correct? >> That's correct. >> Okay. >> So one thing Dell is doing, is we are offering an infrastructure block where we are taking over the overhead of certifying every release coming from the Red Hat or the Wind River of the world, right? We want telcos to spend their resources on what is going to generate them revenue. Not the overhead of creating this cloud stack. >> Dave, I remember when we went through this in the enterprise and you had companies like, you know, IBM with the AS400 and the mainframe saying it's easier to manage, which it was, but it's still, you know, it was subsumed by the open systems trend. >> Yeah, yeah. And I think that's an important thing to probe on, is this idea of what is, what exactly does it mean to be cloud at the edge in the telecom space? Because it's a much used term. >> Yeah. >> When we talk about cloud and edge, in sort of generalized IT, but what specifically does it mean? >> Yeah, so when we talk about telco cloud, first of all it's kind of different from what you're thinking about public cloud today. And there's a couple differences. One, if you look at the big hyperscaler public cloud today, they tend to be centralized in huge data centers. Okay, telco cloud, there are big data centers, but then there's also regional data centers. There are edge data centers, which are your typical like access central offices that have turned data centers, and then now even cell sites are becoming mini data centers. So it's distributed. I mean like you could have like, even in a country like say Germany, you'd have 30,000 soul sites, each one of them being a data center. So it's a very different model. Now the other thing I want to go back to the question of monetization, okay? So how do you do monetization? The only way to do that, is to be able to offer new services, like Charles said. How do you offer new services? You have to have an open ecosystem that's going to be very, very flexible. And if we look at where telcos are coming from today, they tend to be very inflexible 'cause they're all kind of single vendor solutions. And even as we've moved to virtualization, you know, if you look at packet core for instance, a lot of them are these vertical stacks of say a Nokia or Ericson or Huawei where you know, you can't really put any other vendors or any other solutions into that. So basically the idea is this kind of horizontal architecture, right? Where now across, not just my central data centers, but across my edge data centers, which would be traditionally my access COs, as well as my cell sites. I have an open environment. And we're kind of starting with, you know, packet core obviously with, and UPFs being distributed, but now open ran or virtual ran, where I can have CUs and DUs and I can split CUs, they could be at the soul site, they could be in edge data centers. But then moving forward, we're going to have like MEG, which are, you know, which are new kinds of services, you know, could be, you know, remote cars it could be gaming, it could be the Metaverse. And these are going to be a multi-vendor environment. So one of the things you need to do is you need to have you know, this cloud layer, and that's what Charles was talking about with the infrastructure blocks is helping the service providers do that, but they still own their infrastructure. >> Yeah, so it's still not clear to me how the service providers win that game but we can maybe come back to that because I want to dig into TCO a little bit. >> Sure. >> Because I have a lot of friends at Dell. I don't have a lot of friends at HPE. I've always been critical when they take an X86 server put a name on it that implies edge and they throw it over the fence to the edge, that's not going to work, okay? We're now seeing, you know we were just at the Dell booth yesterday, you did the booth crawl, which was awesome. Purpose-built servers for this environment. >> Charles: That's right. >> So there's two factors here that I want to explore in TCO. One is, how those next gen servers compare to the previous gen, especially in terms of power consumption but other factors and then how these sort of open ran, open ecosystem stacks compared to proprietary stacks. Peter, can you help us understand those? >> Yeah, sure. And Charles can comment on this as well. But I mean there, there's a couple areas. One is just moving the next generation. So especially on the Intel side, moving from Ice Lake to the Sapphire Rapids is a big deal, especially when it comes to the DU. And you know, with the radios, right? There's the radio unit, the RU, and then there's the DU the distributed unit, and the CU. The DU is really like part of the radio, but it's virtualized. When we moved from Ice lake to Sapphire Rapids, which is third generation intel to fourth generation intel, we're literally almost doubling the performance in the DU. And that's really important 'cause it means like almost half the number of servers and we're talking like 30, 40, 50,000 servers in some cases. So, you know, being able to divide that by two, that's really big, right? In terms of not only the the cost but all the TCO and the OpEx. Now another area that's really important, when I was talking moving from these vertical silos to the horizontal, the issue with the vertical silos is, you can't place any other workloads into those silos. So it's kind of inefficient, right? Whereas when we have the horizontal architecture, now you can place workloads wherever you want, which basically also means less servers but also more flexibility, more service agility. And then, you know, I think Charles can comment more, specifically on the XR8000, some things Dell's doing, 'cause it's really exciting relative to- >> Sure. >> What's happening in there. >> So, you know, when we start looking at putting compute at the edge, right? We recognize the first thing we have to do is understand the environment we are going into. So we spend with a lot of time with telcos going to the south side, going to the edge data center, looking at operation, how do the engineer today deal with maintenance replacement at those locations? Then based on understanding the operation constraints at those sites, we create innovation and take a traditional server, remodel it to make sure that we minimize the disruption to the operations, right? Just because we are helping them going from appliances to open compute, we do not want to disrupt what is have been a very efficient operation on the remote sites. So we created a lot of new ideas and develop them on general compute, where we believe we can save a lot of headache and disruptions and still provide the same level of availability, resiliency, and redundancy on an open compute platform. >> So when we talk about open, we don't mean generic? Fair? See what I mean? >> Open is more from the software workload perspective, right? A Dell server can run any type of workload that customer intend. >> But it's engineered for this? >> Environment. >> Environment. >> That's correct. >> And so what are some of the environmental issues that are dealt with in the telecom space that are different than the average data center? >> The most basic one, is in most of the traditional cell tower, they are deployed within cabinets instead of racks. So they are depth constraints that you just have no access to the rear of the chassis. So that means on a server, is everything you need to access, need to be in the front, nothing should be in the back. Then you need to consider how labor union come into play, right? There's a lot of constraint on who can go to a cell tower and touch power, who can go there and touch compute, right? So we minimize all that disruption through a modular design and make it very efficient. >> So when we took a look at XR8000, literally right here, sitting on the desk. >> Uh-huh. >> Took it apart, don't panic, just pulled out some sleds and things. >> Right, right. >> One of the interesting demonstrations was how it compared to the size of a shoe. Now apparently you hired someone at Dell specifically because they wear a size 14 shoe, (Charles laughs) so it was even more dramatic. >> That's right. >> But when you see it, and I would suggest that viewers go back and take a look at that segment, specifically on the hardware. You can see exactly what you just referenced. This idea that everything is accessible from the front. Yeah. >> So I want to dig in a couple things. So I want to push back a little bit on what you were saying about the horizontal 'cause there's the benefit, if you've got the horizontal infrastructure, you can run a lot more workloads. But I compare it to the enterprise 'cause I, that was the argument, I've made that argument with converged infrastructure versus say an Oracle vertical stack, but it turned out that actually Oracle ran Oracle better, okay? Is there an analog in telco or is this new open architecture going to be able to not only service the wide range of emerging apps but also be as resilient as the proprietary infrastructure? >> Yeah and you know, before I answer that, I also want to say that we've been writing a number of white papers. So we have actually three white papers we've just done with Dell looking at infrastructure blocks and looking at vertical versus horizontal and also looking at moving from the previous generation hardware to the next generation hardware. So all those details, you can find the white papers, and you can find them either in the Dell website or at the ACG research website >> ACGresearch.com? >> ACG research. Yeah, if you just search ACG research, you'll find- >> Yeah. >> Lots of white papers on TCO. So you know, what I want to say, relative to the vertical versus horizontal. Yeah, obviously in the vertical side, some of those things will run well, I mean it won't have issues. However, that being said, as we move to cloud native, you know, it's very high performance, okay? In terms of the stack, whether it be a Red Hat or a VMware or other cloud layers, that's really become much more mature. It now it's all CNF base, which is really containerized, very high performance. And so I don't think really performance is an issue. However, my feeling is that, if you want to offer new services and generate new revenue, you're not going to do it in vertical stacks, period. You're going to be able to do a packet core, you'll be able to do a ran over here. But now what if I want to offer a gaming service? What if I want to do metaverse? What if I want to do, you have to have an environment that's a multi-vendor environment that supports an ecosystem. Even in the RAN, when we look at the RIC, and the xApps and the rApps, these are multi-vendor environments that's going to create a lot of flexibility and you can't do that if you're restricted to, I can only have one vendor running on this hardware. >> Yeah, we're seeing these vendors work together and create RICs. That's obviously a key point, but what I'm hearing is that there may be trade offs, but the incremental value is going to overwhelm that. Second question I have, Peter is, TCO, I've been hearing a lot about 30%, you know, where's that 30% come from? Is it Op, is it from an OpEx standpoint? Is it labor, is it power? Is it, you mentioned, you know, cutting the number of servers in half. If I can unpack the granularity of that TCO, where's the benefit coming from? >> Yeah, the answer is yes. (Peter and Charles laugh) >> Okay, we'll do. >> Yeah, so- >> One side that, in terms of, where is the big bang for the bucks? >> So I mean, so you really need to look at the white paper to see details, but definitely power, definitely labor, definitely reducing the number of servers, you know, reducing the CapEx. The other thing is, is as you move to this really next generation horizontal telco cloud, there's the whole automation and orchestration, that is a key component as well. And it's enabled by what Dell is doing. It's enabled by the, because the thing is you're not going to have end-to-end automation if you have all this legacy stuff there or if you have these vertical stacks where you can't integrate. I mean you can automate that part and then you have separate automation here, you separate. you need to have integrated automation and orchestration across the whole thing. >> One other point I would add also, right, on the hardware perspective, right? With the customized hardware, what we allow operator to do is, take out the existing appliance and push a edge optimized server without reworking the entire infrastructure. There is a significant saving where you don't have to rethink about what is my power infrastructure, right? What is my security infrastructure? The server is designed to leverage the existing, what is already there. >> How should telco, Charles, plan for this transformation? Are there specific best practices that you would recommend in terms of the operational model? >> Great question. I think first thing is do an inventory of what you have. Understand what your constraints are and then come to Dell, we will love to consult with you, based on our experience on the best practices. We know how to minimize additional changes. We know how to help your support engineer, understand how to shift appliance based operation to a cloud-based operation. >> Is that a service you offer? Is that a pre-sales freebie? What is maybe both? >> It's both. >> Yeah. >> It's both. >> Yeah. >> Guys- >> Just really quickly. >> We're going to wrap. >> The, yeah. Dave loves the TCO discussion. I'm always thinking in terms of, well how do you measure TCO when you're comparing something where you can't do something to an environment where you're going to be able to do something new? And I know that that's always the challenge in any kind of emerging market where things are changing, any? >> Well, I mean we also look at, not only TCO, but we look at overall business case. So there's basically service at GLD and revenue and then there's faster time to revenues. Well, and actually ACG, we actually have a platform called the BAE or Business Analytics Engine that's a very sophisticated simulation cloud-based platform, where we can actually look at revenue month by month. And we look at what's the impact of accelerating revenue by three months. By four months. >> So you're looking into- >> By six months- >> So you're forward looking. You're just not consistently- >> So we're not just looking at TCO, we're looking at the overall business case benefit. >> Yeah, exactly right. There's the TCO, which is the hard dollars. >> Right. >> CFO wants to see that, he or she needs to see that. But you got to, you can convince that individual, that there's a business case around it. >> Peter: Yeah. >> And then you're going to sign up for that number. >> Peter: Yeah. >> And they're going to be held to it. That's the story the world wants. >> At the end of the day, telcos have to be offered new services 'cause look at all the money that's been spent. >> Dave: Yeah, that's right. >> On investment on 5G and everything else. >> 0.5 trillion over the next seven years. All right, guys, we got to go. Sorry to cut you off. >> Okay, thank you very much. >> But we're wall to wall here. All right, thanks so much for coming on. >> Dave: Fantastic. >> All right, Dave Vellante, for Dave Nicholson. Lisa Martin's in the house. John Furrier in Palo Alto Studios. Keep it right there. MWC 23 live from the Fira in Barcelona. (light airy music)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. and Peter Fetterolf is the of the elusive next wave of creating the entire vertical of the original stack- or the Wind River of the world, right? AS400 and the mainframe in the telecom space? So one of the things you need to do how the service providers win that game the fence to the edge, to the previous gen, So especially on the Intel side, We recognize the first thing we have to do from the software workload is in most of the traditional cell tower, sitting on the desk. Took it apart, don't panic, One of the interesting demonstrations accessible from the front. But I compare it to the Yeah and you know, Yeah, if you just search ACG research, and the xApps and the rApps, but the incremental value Yeah, the answer is yes. and then you have on the hardware perspective, right? inventory of what you have. Dave loves the TCO discussion. and then there's faster time to revenues. So you're forward looking. So we're not just There's the TCO, But you got to, you can And then you're going to That's the story the world wants. At the end of the day, and everything else. Sorry to cut you off. But we're wall to wall here. Lisa Martin's in the house.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Charles | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Charles Tsai | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Fetterolf | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ericson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Huawei | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ACG Business Analytics | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ACG | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
TCO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
four months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
0.5 trillion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
two factors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
MWC 23 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Germany | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
XR8000 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
Ice Lake | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one vendor | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Palo Alto Studios | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
third generation | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
fourth generation | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
40, 50,000 servers | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
telco cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
each one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Udayan Mukherjee, Intel & Manish Singh, Dell Techhnologies | MWC Barcelona 2023
(soft corporate jingle) >> Announcer: theCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies. Creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat jingle intro) >> Welcome back to Barcelona. We're here live at the Fira. (laughs) Just amazing day two of MWC23. It's packed today. It was packed yesterday. It's even more packed today. All the news is flowing. Check out siliconangle.com. John Furrier is in the studio in Palo Alto breaking all the news. And, we are here live. Really excited to have Udayan Mukherjee who's the Senior Fellow and Chief Architect of wireless product at Network and Edge for Intel. And, Manish Singh is back. He's the CTO of Telecom Systems Business at Dell Jets. Welcome. >> Thank you. >> Thank you >> We're going to talk about greening the network. I wonder, Udayan, if you could just set up why that's so important. I mean, it's obvious that it's an important thing, great for the environment, but why is it extra important in Telco? >> Yeah, thank you. Actually, I'll tell you, this morning I had a discussion with an operator. The first thing he said, that the electricity consumption is more expensive nowadays that total real estate that he's spending money on. So, it's like that is the number one thing that if you can change that, bring that power consumption down. And, if you talk about sustainability, look what is happening in Europe, what's happening in all the electricity areas. That's the critical element that we need to address. Whether we are defining chip, platforms, storage systems, that's the number one mantra right now. You know, reduce the power. Electricity consumption, because it's a sustainable planet that we are living in. >> So, you got CapEx and OpEx. We're talking about the big piece of OpEx is now power consumption? >> Power Consumption >> That's the point. Okay, so in my experience, servers are the big culprit for power consumption, which is powered by core semiconductors and microprocessors. So, what's the strategy to reduce the power consumption? You're probably not going to reduce the bill overall. You maybe just can keep pace, but from a technical standpoint, how do you attack that? >> Yeah, there are multiple defined ways of adding. Obviously the process technology, that micro (indistinct) itself is evolving to make it more low-power systems. But, even within the silicon, the server that we develop, if you look in a CPU, there is a lot of power states. So, if you have a 32 code platform, as an example, every code you can vary the frequency and the C-states, power states. So, if you look into any traffic, whether it's a radio access network, packet code. At any given time the load is not peak. So, your power consumption, actual what we are drawing from the wall, it also needs to vary with that. So, that's how if you look into this there's a huge savings. If you go to Intel booth or Ericson booth or anyone, you will see right now every possible, the packet code, radio access network, everything network. They're talking about our energy consumption, how they're lowering this. These states, as we call it power states, C-state P-state they've built in intel chip for a long time. The cloud providers are taking advantage of it. But Telcos, with even two generation before they used to actually switch it off in the bios. I say no, we need peak. Now, that thing is changing. Now, it's all like, how do I take advantage of the built in technologies? >> I remember the enterprise virtualization, Manish, was a big play. I remember PG&E used to give rebates to customers that would install virtualized software, VMware. >> And SSDs. >> Yeah. And SSDs, you know, yes. Because, the spinning disc was, but, nowhere near with a server consumption. So, how virtualized is the telco network? And then, what I'm saying is there other things, other knobs, you can of course turn. So, what's your perspective on this as a server player? >> Yeah, absolutely. Let me just back up a little bit and start at the big picture to share what Udayan said. Here, day two, every conversation I've had yesterday and today morning with every operator, every CTO, they're coming in and first topic they're talking about is energy. And, the reason is, A, it's the right thing to do, sustainability, but, it's also becoming a P&L issue. And, the reason it's becoming a P&L issue is because we are in this energy inflationary environment where the energy costs are constantly going up. So, it's becoming really important for the service providers to really drive more efficiency onto their networks, onto their infrastructure. Number one. Two, then to your question on what all knobs need to be turned on, and what are the knobs? So, Udayan talked about within the intel, silicon, the C-states, P-states and all these capabilities that are being brought up, absolutely important. But again, if we take a macro view of it. First of all, there are opportunities to do infrastructure audit. What's on, why is it on, does it need to be on right now? Number two, there are opportunities to do infrastructure upgrade. And, what I mean by that is as you go from previous generation servers to next generation servers, better cooling, better performance. And through all of that you start to gain power usage efficiency inside a data center. And, you take that out more into the networks you start to achieve same outcomes on the network site. Think about from a cooling perspective, air cooling but for that matter, even liquid cooling, especially inside the data centers. All opportunities around PUE, because PUE, power usage efficiency and improvement on PUE is an opportunity. But, I'll take it even further. Workloads that are coming onto it, core, RAN, these workloads based on the dynamic traffic. Look, if you look at the traffic inside a network, it's not constant, it's varied. As the traffic patterns change, can you reduce the amount of infrastructure you're using? I.e. reduce the amount of power that you're using and when the traffic loads are going up. So, the workloads themselves need to become more smarter about that. And last, but not the least. From an orchestration layer if you think about it, where you are placing these workloads, and depending on what's available, you can start to again, drive better energy outcomes. And, not to forget acceleration. Where you need acceleration, can you have the right hardware infrastructures delivering the right kind of accelerations to again, improve those energy efficiency outcomes. So, it's a complex problem. But, there are a lot of levers, lot of tools that are in place that the service providers, the technology builders like us, are building the infrastructure, and then the workload providers all come together to really solve this problem. >> Yeah, Udayan, Manish mentioned this idea of moving from one generation to a new generation and gaining benefits. Out there on the street, if you will. Most of the time it's an N plus 2 migration. It's not just moving from last generation to this next generation, but it's really a generation ago. So, those significant changes in the dynamics around power density and cooling are meaningful? You talk about where performance should be? We start talking about the edge. It's hard to have a full-blown raised data center floor edge everywhere. Do these advances fundamentally change the kinds of things that you can do at the base of a tower? >> Yeah, absolutely. Manish talked about that, the dynamic nature of the workload. So, we are using a lot of this AIML to actually predict. Like for example, your multiple force in a systems. So, why is the 32 core as a system, why is all running? So, your traffic profile in the night times. So, you are in the office areas, in the night has gone home and nowadays everybody's working from remote anyway. So, why is this thing a full blown, spending the TDP, the total power and extreme powers. You bring it down, different power states, C-states. We talked about it. Deeper C-states or P-states, you bring the frequency down. So, lot of those automation, even at the base of the tower. Lot of our deployment right now, we are doing a whole bunch of massive MIMO deployment. Virtual RAN in Verizon network. All actually cell-site deployment. Those eight centers are very close to the cell-site. And, they're doing aggressive power management. So, you don't have to go to a huge data centers, even there's a small rack of systems, four to five, 10 systems, you can do aggressive power management. And, you built it up that way. >> Okay. >> If I may just build on what Udayan said. I mean if you look at the radio access network, right? And, let's start at the bottom of the tower itself. The infrastructure that's going in there, especially with Open RAN, if you think about it, there are opportunities now to do a centralized RAN where you could do more BBU pooling. And, with that, not only on a given tower but across a given given coverage area, depending on what the traffics are, you can again get the infrastructure to become more efficient in terms of what traffic, what needs are, and really start to benefit. The pooling gains which is obviously going to give you benefit on the CapEx side, but from an energy standpoint going to give you benefits on the OpEx side of things. So that's important. The second thing I will say is we cannot forget, especially on the radio access side of things, that it's not just the bottom of the tower what's happening there. What's happening on the top of the tower especially with the radio, that's super important. And, that goes into how do you drive better PA efficiency, how do you drive better DPD in there? This is where again, applying AI machine learning there is a significant amount of opportunity there to improve the PA performance itself. But then, not only that, looking at traffic patterns. Can you do sleep modes, micro sleep modes to deep sleep modes. Turning down the cells itself, depending on the traffic patterns. So, these are all areas that are now becoming more and more important. And, clearly with our ecosystem of partners we are continuing to work on these. >> So we hear from the operators, it's an OpEx issue. It's hitting the P&L. They're in search of PUE of one. And, they've historically been wasteful, they go full throttle. And now, you're saying with intelligence you can optimize that consumption. So, where does the intelligence live? Is it in the rig. Where is it all throughout the network? Is it in the silicon? Maybe you could paint a picture as to where those smarts exist. >> I can start. It's across the stack. It starts, we talked about the C-states, P-states. If you want to take advantage of that, that intelligence is in the workload, which has to understand when can I really start to clock things down or turn off the cores. If you really look at it from a traffic pattern perspective you start to really look at a rig level where you can have power. And, we are working with the ecosystem partners who are looking at applying machine learning on that to see what can we really start to turn on, turn off, throttle things down, depending on what the, so yes, it's across the stack. And lastly, again, I'll go back to cannot forget orchestration, where you again have the ability to move some of these workloads and look at where your workload placements are happening depending on what infrastructure is and what the traffic needs are at that point in time. So it's, again, there's no silver bullet. It has to be looked across the stack. >> And, this is where actually if I may, last two years a sea change has happened. People used to say, okay there are C-states and P-states, there's silicon every code. OS operating system has a governor built in. We rely on that. So, that used to be the way. Now that applications are getting smarter, if you look at a radio access network or the packet core on the control plane signaling application, they're more aware of the what is the underlying silicon power state sleep states are available. So, every time they find some of these areas there's no enough traffic there, they immediately goes to a transition. So, the workload has become more intelligent. The rig application we talked about. Every possible rig application right now are apps on xApps. Most of them are on energy efficiency. How are they using it? So, I think lot more even the last two years. >> Can I just say one more thing there right? >> Yeah. >> We cannot forget the infrastructure as well, right? I mean, that's the most important thing. That's where the energy is really getting drawn in. And, constant improvement on the infrastructure. And, I'll give you some data points, right? If you really look at the power at servers, right? From 2013 to 2023, like a decade. 85% energy intensity improvement, right? So, these gains are coming from performance with better cooling, better technology applications. So, that's super critical, that's important. And, also to just give you another data point. Apart from the infrastructure what cache layers we are running and how much CPU and compute requirements are there, that's also important. So, looking at it from a cache perspective are we optimizing the required infrastructure blocks for radio access versus core? And again, really taking that back to energy efficiency outcomes. So, some of the work we've been doing with Wind River and Red Hat and some of our ecosystem partners around that for radio access network versus core. Really again, optimizing for those different use cases and the outcomes of those start to come in from an energy utilization perspective >> So, 85% improvement in power consumption. Of course you're doing, I don't know, 2, 300% more work, right? So, let's say, and I'm just sort of spit balling numbers but, let's say that historically powers on the P&L has been, I don't know, single digits, maybe 10%. Now, it's popping up the much higher. >> Udayan: Huge >> Right? >> I mean, I don't know what the number is. Is it over 20% in some cases or is it, do you have a sense of that? Or let's say it is. The objective I presume is you're probably not going to lower the power bill overall, but you're going to be able to lower the percent of cost on the OpEx as you grow, right? I mean, we're talking about 5G networks. So much more data >> Capacity increasing. >> Yeah, and so is it, am I right about that the carriers, the best they can hope for is to sort of stay even on that percentage or maybe somewhat lower that percentage? Or, do you think they can actually cut the bill? What's the goal? What are they trying to do? >> The goal is to cut the bill. >> It is! >> And the way you get started to cut the bill is, as I said, first of all on the radio side. Start to see where the improvements are and look, there's not a whole lot there to be done. I mean, the PS are as efficient as they can be, but as I said, there are things in DPD and all that still can be improved. But then, sleep modes and all, yes there are efficiencies in there. But, I'll give you one important, another interesting data point. We did a work with ACG Research on our 16G platform. The power edge service that we have recently launched based on Intel's Sapphire Rapids. And, if you look at the study there. 30% TCR reduction, 10% in CapEx gains, 30% in OpEx gains from moving away from these legacy monolithic architectures to cloud native architectures. And, a large part of that OpEx gain really starts to come from energy to the point of 800 metric tonnes of carbon reduction to the point of you could have, and if you really translate that to around 160 homes electric use per year, right? So yes, I mean the opportunity there is to reduce the bill. >> Wow, that's big, big goal guys. We got to run. But, thank you for informing the audience on the importance and how you get there. So, appreciate that. >> One thing that bears mentioning really quickly before we wrap, a lot of these things we're talking about are happening in remote locations. >> Oh, back to that point of distributed nature of telecom. >> Yes, we talked about a BBU being at the base of a tower that could be up on a mountain somewhere. >> No, you made the point. You can't just say, oh, hey we're going to go find ambient air or going to go... >> They don't necessarily... >> Go next to a waterfall. >> We don't necessarily have the greatest hydro tower. >> All right, we got to go. Thanks you guys. Alright, keep it right there. Wall to wall coverage is day two of theCUBE's coverage of MWC 23. Stay right there, we'll be right back. (corporate outro jingle)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. John Furrier is in the studio about greening the network. So, it's like that is the number one thing We're talking about the big piece of OpEx reduce the power consumption? So, if you look into any traffic, I remember the enterprise Because, the spinning disc was, So, the workloads themselves the kinds of things that you So, you are in the office areas, to give you benefit on the CapEx side, Is it in the rig. that intelligence is in the workload, So, the workload has and the outcomes of those start to come in historically powers on the P&L on the OpEx as you grow, right? And the way you get on the importance and how you get there. before we wrap, a lot of these Oh, back to that point of being at the base of a tower No, you made the point. the greatest hydro tower. Thanks you guys.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Manish Singh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
PG&E | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Udayan Mukherjee | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2013 | DATE | 0.99+ |
85% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2, 300% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CapEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
32 code | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Udayan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one generation | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Manish | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
OpEx | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two generation | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today morning | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 systems | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
32 core | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
800 metric tonnes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.98+ |
ACG Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Sapphire Rapids | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
over 20% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first topic | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
around 160 homes | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
xApps | TITLE | 0.97+ |
intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Dell Jets | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
last two years | DATE | 0.94+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Dell Techhnologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
P&L | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
day two | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Ericson | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.88+ |
one more thing | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Edge | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
MWC 23 | EVENT | 0.87+ |
MWC | EVENT | 0.86+ |
Telecom Systems Business | ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ |
Number two | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
MWC23 | EVENT | 0.8+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Network | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
5G | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
One thing | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
OpEx | TITLE | 0.7+ |
single digits | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
RAN | TITLE | 0.68+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
16G | OTHER | 0.61+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
Udayan | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
OpEx | OTHER | 0.53+ |
Tibor Fabry Asztalos, Dell Technologies & Gautam Bhagra, Dell Technologies | MWC Barcelona 2023
>> Announcer: "theCUBE's" live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies, creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat music) >> Good evening, everyone. Live from Barcelona, Spain, it's "theCUBE". We are at Mobile World, MWC, excuse me, '23. New name this year. I'm Lisa Martin with Dave Vellante. Dave, we have had some great conversations. This is only day one of four days of coverage from "theCUBE" but one of the things that we've been talking about is disaggregation. You've wrote about it in your breaking analysis. We've been talking about it. Today is a big thing that's happening. We're going to be talking about that next. >> Yeah, open ecosystems require integration. Integration requires certification. And so, you got to have labs. We're going to talk about that and what value that brings to the community. >> Right. Please welcome Tibor Fabry-Asztalos, senior vice president of telecom systems and product engineering at Dell. >> Hi. >> And back to "theCUBE" after a couple of hours, Gautam Bhagra, vice president of partnerships at Dell. Guys, great to have you here. >> I love to be here. Thank you. >> Great to be here. >> So, day one, I'm sure lots of conversations, lots of meetings, lots of jet lag that we're all trying to get over. Talk about, Gautam, we'll start with you. Talk about the disaggregation era. What it is intended to support? What is it intended to enable? >> Yeah, so I mean, I think to be honest with you, Lisa, we spoke about this earlier also, like the whole vision with the disaggregation is to make sure our telco providers can take the benefits of having the innovation that comes along with it, right? So currently, we all know they're tied into like lock systems, which kind of constricts them in going after this whole innovative space. So, our hope is by working with our operators and our partners, we can help make that disaggregation journey a lot easier and work on some of these challenges, and make it easier for the telcos to innovate and consolidate going forward. So, we're working very closely and we talked about the community this morning. We're working very closely with Tibor and his team from an engineering perspective to help build those solutions with our partners and we're excited about the announcements we made this morning. >> When you hear challenges from this ecosystem, can you stack rank 'em? What are you hearing? Kind of what's top of mind? And so, the top three, if you would. >> Some of the challenges are just to define moving from a closed system and open system, just to making sure that the acceptance of that to see what's the value proposition is for an open system and then for the carriers to see the path going from a closed system to an open system. Of course, at the end, people realize the value at the end and speed of innovation that you're going to get all the new technologies and new features, functionality you get in an open system. But then the challenge comes with it, how you actually integrate those and then validate them, and you are to deploy them. So in a sense, that's the opportunity and also some of the challenge along the way. And that's where, as Gautam said, that's where we are also looking at playing the key role with the OTEL lab, the Open Telecom Ecosystem Lab, where we take these pieces of the open ecosystem and have combined them, validate them, and provide the pipeline to the customer. Pre-integration and then full integration into the production network. >> Those challenges, I presume, vary whether you're talking to a greenfield network operator versus somebody who's got a 40, 50 year history, a hundred-year history in the business, right? I mean migration is a big issue for them, right? Whereas the greenfield, we heard from DISH earlier, they want to drive innovation so they might be willing to sacrifice some other areas. So, is that a fair summarization and what are you hearing? >> [Tibor and Gautam] Yeah. >> Absolutely it is. I mean, that's where you see that DISH being kind of a leader in the space, as they were deploying in greenfield, they defined what the open ecosystem should look like, defined all the components of it, how you integrate them, validate them, and they were able to, well, go through it and deploy it. To your point, for an open, closed systems, as how you actually start transforming the existing network into the open one, that's going to go to a different process, right? You need to figure out how these new open systems can interrupt and work together with existing networks. So, that's one likely some of those carriers will start in an isolated area and grow from there. Deploy an open system in a rural area, for example, and then build from there. >> So, what a bank would do is they say, "Okay, we're going to write in our own abstraction layer." >> Gautam: Yeah. >> Right? "Using microservices, we're going to connect to the cloud. And we're going to, you know, put maybe some lower risk applications in the cloud first and then we're going to create our own cloud." Is there a similar dynamic here? >> Yeah, I mean, so I think you're spot on, right? Like, I think one of the things that we are seeing with the telco operators that we've spoken to is they're very risk averse. >> Yep. >> Right, they have very strong SLA requirements. They cannot go down even for a second. So, what that basically means is the innovation aspect is constrained by the risks that they perceive on any changes that you want to make on the architecture. So, the question that comes up is how do we make it easier for them to not worry about the bare minimum requirements of making sure the network's running and working while thinking about the new innovative technologies and solutions you want to build on the start. So, back to your bank example, nine years ago, no one in a bank even was thinking about like applications that will run on the cloud. Like for them, it was like a side project. They'll try and test something, see if it works, and then they'll think about cloud in the future, right? But now, core applications on banks are actually being built on public cloud. I think we see the same happening with the telco operators as well. Right now, they're understanding the move from a closed ecosystem to an open ecosystem. They understand the value proposition. On the core side, it's already happening a lot. And I think they are slowly moving there and that's where I think Tibor and team have been doing a great job working with our customers to make the transition happen. >> But there are so many permutations. >> Right. >> And integration points. How is Dell addressing that across the ecosystem? >> So, to give you an example, we talked about OTEL, which is our brand new, kind of 13,000 square feet lab that we kind of inaugurated last year based in Round Rock, Texas. >> Dave: Open Telecom. >> Dave and Tibor: Ecosystem Lab. >> Correct, great. And so, as part of that, that's a physical lab but more importantly, that's kind of a community where partners, customers come together to actually, and collaborate and work on these solutions. And as part of this, we also develop what we call the SIP, or Solution Integration Platform, to enable exactly what you just said. Making sure that we have a platform that actually can take all these various components, validate them individually, combine them, and then provide a DevOps and GitOps model, how you actually combine them, provide the BOM or SBOM, and then push that to pre-production and deployments for our customers. So, that's part of the challenge as we talked earlier. And that's how Dell and we are looking at actually enabling this basically, the validation of this disaggregated wall. >> Oh. >> Sorry, I just wanted to- >> Go ahead. >> just going to add one more point, right? So, when we look at the partners that we are working with as well in the OTEL and there are three ways we are working with them. At the bare minimum, we want to make sure that solution will run on the Dell infrastructure and the hardware, right? So, we have the self-certification process. We had a lot of good uptake on it and we are seeing a lot more come in. In fact, I had a check-in with "theCUBE" this morning in our side and it's more than a hundred plus partners already interested in going through that. Awesome. Then we have other places where we work on with partners to build reference architectures together, right? So, we want some sort of validated solution that will work together that we can take to the market. And then we also have engineered solutions that we are building with partners like the infrastructure block offering that we have taken where it's all pre-packaged, pre-built by Dell, working very closely with our partners. So, the telcos don't have to worry about deployment, integration, and everything else that comes along. >> And I presume the security supply chain is part of that- >> Yes. >> bill of materials- >> Absolutely. >> you just described. >> Yeah. >> Exactly. >> And that would include all those levels, the engineered systems, the reference architectures as well? And how do you decide like candidates, we can't do it all, right? So, it's the big markets get the engineered system, is that right? How do you adjudicate there? >> Yeah, so I mean, I think there are a couple of angles to look at it, right? I think the first and foremost is where we see the biggest demand is coming from the customers in terms of the stack they already have and where they have the pain points. >> Dave: Okay. >> Right, so this is why we are working with Red Hat and Wind River, as an example, because they are in most of the deployments that we are aware of with the customers and where we see an opportunity for Dell to partner with these partners. I think we are seeing a lot of new players also coming up the stack. And as they come up the stack and we find opportunities to co-build and co-innovate, absolutely we'll be building joint solutions with them as well. >> Where are you on, from a partnership perspective, on the strategic vision? You mentioned a number of things that have already been accomplished, quite a few. But from your journey perspective on that strategy, where are you? >> Yeah, so it's a really good question. I think we really want to be the partner of choice for all technology and services company within the telecom space. We're looking to drive the transformation in the network area, right? So, that's the vision that we have in the telecom system business from a partnership side. We have created some really good strategic partnerships with key providers, with independent software vendors, the network equipment providers. We're having some really good, strategic conversations with them. You've heard some of the announcement come out today, the work we are doing with Nokia, with Samsung, the Red Hat announcement, the Wind River, and so on and so forth. And there's a lot more in the pipeline. But more importantly, we want to grow the impact of the ecosystem. So, that's why we are launching the partner community today as well to make that happen. >> How does the lab work? Who has access to it? Can I self-certify? If I can self-certify, how do you make sure that I'm following the rules, all of the stuff- >> Sure. >> that you would- >> Absolutely. >> expect. >> So yes, you can self-certify, that's Gautam just mentioned. We already had quite a few ISVs go through that self-certification. And then there's also, there's reference architecture that's being done and other engineered solutions that we talked about earlier. And the lab is set up in a way that when needed, test lines can be isolated. So, only certain set of partners have access to it. So, it's made up in a way that enables collaborations. At the same times, it kind of enables a certain set of customers and partners working together without having challenges of having a completely open system. >> Okay, but so, if I want to do something with you guys and let's say, I am a candidate for an engineered system, so how does it work? Somebody's got to buy the equipment, right? He's got to ship it, right? There's a lot of Dell equipment involved. >> Tibor: That's correct. >> There's other third-party CapEx software, et cetera. So, you fund that, the partners fund that, it's a hybrid funding model, how does that all get done? >> So today, for obviously, we work closely with those partners. The engineered solutions we've developed so far, we've been funding it largely and as you said, is Dell infrastructure plus the cast layers and the cloud players we work with. So, we actually put those in place. We funded them, of course, with participation from them. And that's being done through those labs. >> Okay, great. So, you guys are providing that benefit to the ecosystem. Writing checks, bringing engineering talent to the table. >> Gautam: Yeah. >> Okay. >> And at the same time, I mean, it's a partnership at the end of the day, right? So, depending on the kind of partnership we are. So, if you're an ISV, it's fairly simple. Come into our labs. You don't have to worry about the infrastructure. >> Sure. >> Run it all in our labs and you're good. If you're a hardware vendor or a NEP, network equipment provider, that's where it gets interesting where they need to send us stuff, we need to send them stuff. And usually, like Tibor mentioned, it's a joint collaboration. We all put in our chips on the table and we work together. >> So, when you're having conversations with prospective partners, obviously different types of partners, Gautam, that you just talked about, what's in it for them? What's the value proposition? What does this community- >> Gautam: Yeah. >> give them from a competitive advantage standpoint? >> Yeah, so I mean there are, so the way I think about it, right? There are three things that Dell is bringing to the table. The first one is our experience and expertise on doing this transformation within the enterprise space and the learnings we have from there that we're bringing to telco now, right? So, Dell's been working with enterprises for many, many years. We are one of the big providers there. We all know what transformation enterprise went through. >> Tibor: Telco transformation, IT transformation. >> Exactly. And that's the experience we have, which we're bringing to telco. The second one is our investment, both from a go-to market side as well as the way we are working with our sales and marketing, and so on and so forth, with the engineering side. And finally, I think, and this for me is the best one, is Dell is a very partner-centric organization. >> Lisa: Yes. >> Our strategy is built around partnerships. So, that's the other piece that we bring to the table. >> Where are the labs? Oh, go ahead. >> And what's one more note on that, and also, we are talking about the engineered solutions. There's also the supply chain then because that's a basically appliance and then that goes to Dell's supply chain, which is best in class. >> Dave: And where are the labs? How many are there? >> So Round Rock, Texas is the biggest one, the 13,000 square feet. We also have extension to it. We just announced opening one in Cork for the EME market to making sure that we can cover any regulatory challenges. But also, basically any test lines that we need to cover that have latency challenges. That's why we want to make sure that we have labs in other areas as well. >> And the go-to market, is it an overlay organization, a dedicated organization? >> Yeah, so it's a bit of both as you know. But yeah, in the telecom business unit, we have a dedicated sales organization as well as an alliance organization working very closely with product and engineering to take it to market. >> Given the strength and the breadth of the partner program in the community, based on this is only day one of MWC but is there anything that you've heard today that excites you where telecom is going and where Dell and its ecosystem is going and really burgeoning? >> Oh, I've had I don't know how many meetings since 6:00 AM this morning. So, it's been an amazing event and we're just having so many great conversations with partners, our customers. And I think a lot of today is all about figuring out what our strategy and our vision is, where is each side going and what the overlap is. I think the end result's going to be follow up conversations with a lot of these partners that we are working with or will be working with soon. And then thinking about, do we build engineered solutions together? Do we go validated route? Like we going to figure that out. But I mean, for me, this is like the perfect place to come and share your vision and strategy and understand what we are trying to solve for. >> To me, what's been interesting that all the interactions and discussions are about how to get to or render open ecosystem. That's great to see that the focus is on how to make it work versus still questioning it and I think that's pretty good. >> Well, you guys launched this business I think during the pandemic, right? >> Yes. >> Yeah, that's right. >> So I mean, you could do a lot over Zoom, but as we were talking about earlier, having the face-to-face interaction, there's no replacement for it. The 6:00 AM meetings versus the 30 minute zoom calls and your body language, I mean, you learn so much that you can take away from these events. >> Absolutely. Seeing someone in 3D is so different and it's good to build that relationship and rapport as well with the folks. >> I agree. >> It is. There's so much value in the hallway conversations that you can't have over Zoom. So, I guess last question for you as we head into to day two, what are some of the things that we can be on the lookout for from Dell and its ecosystem? >> Hmm. >> Interesting. (Tibor chuckling) >> I mean, all our announcements are out. I think what you can look at for us to really be leading in this segment, taking a leadership role, and continuously looking at how we can really enable the open ecosystem and how we can provide more value there, and how we can see how we can lead in this space. >> How you can lead in this space. >> Yeah, I mean for me, I mean, day two is like, I have a lot more meetings in day two than day one so I don't know if it's like people flying in today or what, but it's amazing to just meet the partners and customers. >> So, that theme of velocity for you is going to keep going. >> Oh, it's not stopping. (Lisa laughing) That's for sure. We are excited about it. >> Well, thank you for carving out some time to talk to with us on "theCUBE" about the partner program, the open ecosystem and the commitment to growing that and enabling partners to really differentiate their services with Dell. We appreciate it. >> We appreciate it as well. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you for having us. >> Thanks. >> Our pleasure. For our guests and for Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching "theCUBE" live in Barcelona, Spain at MWC '23. Day one of our coverage. Be right back with our final guest of the day so stick around. (upbeat music continues)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. from "theCUBE" but one of the things And so, you got to have labs. of telecom systems and Guys, great to have you here. I love to be here. Talk about the disaggregation era. for the telcos to innovate And so, the top three, and provide the pipeline to the customer. Whereas the greenfield, we a leader in the space, So, what a bank would do is they say, applications in the cloud first things that we are seeing So, the question that comes that across the ecosystem? So, to give you an example, So, that's part of the At the bare minimum, we want to make sure in terms of the stack they already have that we are aware of with the customers on the strategic vision? So, that's the vision that we have And the lab is set up in the equipment, right? the partners fund that, and the cloud players we work with. that benefit to the ecosystem. So, depending on the kind We all put in our chips on the and the learnings we have from there Tibor: Telco transformation, And that's the experience we have, So, that's the other piece Where are the labs? and then that goes to Dell's supply chain, to making sure that we can of both as you know. that we are working with that all the interactions having the face-to-face interaction, different and it's good to build that we can be on the lookout for and how we can see how we the partners and customers. So, that theme of velocity We are excited about it. about the partner program, final guest of the day
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Samsung | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gautam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tibor | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gautam Bhagra | PERSON | 0.99+ |
30 minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tibor Fabry-Asztalos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
OTEL | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
13,000 square feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
6:00 AM | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cork | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona, Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Round Rock, Texas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tibor Fabry Asztalos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than a hundred plus partners | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DISH | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three ways | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40, 50 year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
'23 | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Open Telecom Ecosystem Lab | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
nine years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
each side | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Mobile World | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
four days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
theCUBE | TITLE | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
first one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
day two | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
MWC | EVENT | 0.96+ |
OTEL lab | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
6:00 AM this morning | DATE | 0.95+ |
Scott Walker, Wind River & Gautam Bhagra, Dell Technologies | MWC Barcelona 2023
(light music) >> Narrator: theCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies. Creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat music) >> Welcome back to Spain everyone. Lisa Martin here with theCUBE Dave Vellante, my co-host for the next four days. We're live in Barcelona, covering MWC23. This is only day one, but I'll tell you the theme of this conference this year is velocity. And I don't know about you Dave, but this day is flying by already. This is ecosystem day. We're going to have a great discussion on the ecosystem next. >> Well we're seeing the disaggregation of the hardened telco stack, and that necessitates an ecosystem open- we're going to talk about Open RAN, we've been talking about even leading up to the show. It's a critical technology enabler and it's compulsory to have an ecosystem to support that. >> Absolutely compulsory. We've got two guests here joining us, Gautam Bhagra, Vice President partnerships at Dell, and Scott Walker, Vice President of global Telco ecosystem at Wind River. Guys, welcome to the program. >> Nice to be here. >> Thanks For having us. >> Thanks for having us. >> So you've got some news, this is day one of the conference, there's some news, Gautam, and let's start with you, unpack it. >> Yeah, well there's a lot of news, as you know, on Dell World. One of the things we are very excited to announce today is the launch of the Open Telecom Ecosystems Community. I think Dave, as you mentioned, getting into an Open RAN world is a challenge. And we know some of the challenges that our customers face. To help solve for those challenges, Dell wants to work with like-minded partners and customers to build innovative solutions, and join go-to-market. So we are launching that today. Wind River is one of our flagship partners for that, and I'm excited to be here to talk about that as well. >> Can you guys talk a little bit about the partnership, maybe a little bit about Wind River so the audience gets that context? >> Sure, absolutely, and the theme of the show, Velocity, is what this partnership is all about. We create velocity for operators if they want to adopt Open RAN, right? We simplify it. Wind River as a company has been around for 40 years. We were part of Intel at one point, and now we're independent, owned by a company called Aptiv. And with that we get another round of investment to help continue our acceleration into this market. So, the Dell partnership is about, like I said, velocity, accelerating the adoption. When we talk to operators, they have told us there are many roadblocks that they face, right? Like systems integration, operating at scale. 'Cause when you buy a traditional radio access network solution from a single supplier, it's very easy. It's works, it's been tested. When you break these components apart and disaggregate 'em, as we talked about David, it creates integration points and support issues, right? And what Dell and Wind River have done together is created a cloud infrastructure solution that could host a variety of RAN workloads, and essentially create a two layer cake. What we're, overall, what we're trying to do is create a traditional RAN experience, with the innovation agility and flexibility of Open RAN. And that's really what this partnership does. >> So these work, this workload innovation is interesting to me because you've got now developers, you know, the, you know, what's the telco developer look like, you know, is to be defined, right? I mean it's like this white sheet of paper that can create all this innovation. And to do that, you've got to have, as I said earlier, an ecosystem. But you've got now, I'm interested in your Open RAN agenda and how you see that sort of maturity model taking place. 'Cause today, you got disruptors that are going to lean right in say "Hey, yeah, that's great." The traditional carriers, they have to have a, you know, they have to migrate, they have to have a hybrid world. We know that takes time. So what's that look like in the marketplace today? >> Yeah, so I mean, I can start, right? So from a Dell's perspective, what we see in the market is yes, there is a drive towards, everyone understands the benefits of being open, right? There's the agility piece, the innovation piece. That's a no-brainer. The question is how do we get there? And I think that's where partnerships become critical to get there, right? So we've been working with partners like Wind River to build solutions that make it easier for customers to start adopting some of the foundational elements of an open network. The, one of the purposes in the agenda of building this community is to bring like-minded developers, like you said like we want those guys to come and work with the customers to create new solutions, and come up with something creative, which no one's even thought about, that accelerates your option even quicker, right? So that's exactly what we want to do as well. And that's one of the reasons why we launched the community. >> Yeah, and what we find with a lot of carriers, they are used to buying, like I said, traditional RAN solutions which are provided from a single provider like Erickson or Nokia and others, right? And we break this apart, and you cloudify that network infrastructure, there's usually a skills gap we see at the operator level, right? And so from a developer standpoint, they struggle with having the expertise in order to execute on that. Wind River helps them, working with companies like Dell, simplify that bottom portion of the stack, the infrastructure stack. So, and we lifecycle manage it, we test- we're continually testing it, and integrating it, so that the operator doesn't have to do that. In addition to that, wind River also has a history and legacy of working with different RAN vendors, both disruptors like Mavenir and Parallel Wireless, as well as traditional RAN providers like Samsung, Erickson, and others soon to be announced. So what we're doing on the northbound side is making it easy by integrating that, and on the southbound side with Dell, so that again, instead of four or five solutions that you need to put together, it's simply two. >> And you think about today how we- how you consume telco services are like there's these fixed blocks of services that you can buy, that has to change. It's more like the, the app stores. It's got to be an open marketplace, and that's where the innovation's going to come in, you know, from the developers, you know, top down maybe. I don't know, how do you see that maturity model evolving? People want to know how long it's going to take. So many questions, when will Open RAN be as reliable. Does it even have to be? You know, so many interesting dynamics going on. >> Yeah, and I think that's something we at Dell are also trying to find out, right? So we have been doing a lot of good work here to help our customers move in that direction. The work with Dish is an example of that. But I think we do understand the challenges as well in terms of getting, adopting the technologies, and adopting the innovation that's being driven by Open. So one of the agendas that we have as a company this year is to work with the community to drive this a lot further, right? We want to have customers adopt the technology more broadly with the tier one, tier two telcos globally. And our sales organizations are going to be working together with Wind Rivers to figure out who's the right set of customers to have these conversations with, so we can drop, drive, start driving this agenda a lot quicker than what we've seen historically. >> And where are you having those customer conversations? Is that at the operator level, is it higher, is it both? >> Well, all operators are deploying 5G in preparation for 6G, right? And we're all looking for those killer use cases which will drive top line revenue and not just make it a TCO discussion. And that starts at a very basic level today by doing things like integrating with Juniper, for their cloud router. So instead of at the far edge cell site, having a separate device that's doing the routing function, right? We take that and we cloudify that application, run it on the same server that's hosting the RAN applications, so you eliminate a device and reduce TCO. Now with Aptiv, which is primarily known as an automotive company, we're having lots of conversations, including with Dell and Intel and others about vehicle to vehicle communication, vehicle to anything communication. And although that's a little bit futuristic, there are shorter term use cases that, like, vehicle to vehicle accident avoidance, which are going to be much nearer term than autonomous driving, for example, which will help drive traffic and new revenue streams for operators. >> So, oh, that's, wow. So many other things (Scott laughs) that's just opened up there too. But I want to come back to, sort of, the Open RAN adoption. And I think you're right, there's a lot of questions that that still have to be determined. But my question is this, based on your knowledge so far does it have to be as hardened and reliable, obviously has to be low latency as existing networks, or can flexibility, like the cloud when it first came out, wasn't better than enterprise IT, it was just more flexible and faster, and you could rent it. And, is there a similar dynamic here where it doesn't have to replicate the hardened stack, it can bring in new benefits that drive adoption, what are your thoughts on that? >> Well there's a couple of things on that, because Wind River, as you know, where our legacy and history is in embedded devices like F-15 fighter jets, right? Or the Mars Rover or the James Web telescope, all run Wind River software. So, we know about can't fail ultra reliable systems, and operators are not letting us off the hook whatsoever. It has to be as hardened and locked down, as secure as a traditional RAN environment. Otherwise they will (indistinct). >> That's table stakes. >> That's table stakes that gets us there. And when River, with our legacy and history, and having operator experience running live commercial networks with a disaggregated stack in the tens of thousands of nodes, understand what this is like because they're running live commercial traffic with live customers. So we can't fail, right? And with that, they want their cake and eat it too, right? Which is, I want ultra reliable, I want what I have today, but I want the agility and flexibility to onboard third party apps. Like for example, this JCNR, this Juniper Cloud-Native Router. You cannot do something as simple as that on a traditional RAN Appliance. In an open ecosystem you can take that workload and onboard it because it is an open ecosystem, and that's really one of the true benefits. >> So they want the mainframe, but they want (Scott laughs) the flexibility of the developer cloud, right? >> That's right. >> They want their, have their cake eat it too and not gain weight. (group laughs) >> Yeah I mean David, I come from the public cloud world. >> We all don't want to do that. >> I used to work with a public cloud company, and nine years ago, public cloud was in the same stage, where you would go to a bank, and they would be like, we don't trust the cloud. It's not secure, it's not safe. It was the digital natives that adopted it, and that that drove the industry forward, right? And that's where the enterprises that realized that they're losing business because of all these innovative new companies that came out. That's what I saw over the last nine years in the cloud space. I think in the telco space also, something similar might happen, right? So a lot of this, I mean a lot of the new age telcos are understanding the value, are looking to innovate are adopting the open technologies, but there's still some inertia and hesitancy, for the reasons as Scott mentioned, to go there so quickly. So we just have to work through and balance between both sides. >> Yeah, well with that said, if there's still some inertia, but there's a theme of velocity, how do you help organizations balance that so they trust evolving? >> Yeah, and I think this is where our solution, like infrastructure block, is a foundational pillar to make that happen, right? So if we can take away the concerns that the organizations have in terms of security, reliability from the fundamental elements that build their infrastructure, by working with partners like Wind River, but Dell takes the ownership end-to-end to make sure that service works and we have those telco grade SLAs, then the telcos can start focusing on what's next. The applications and the customer services on the top. >> Customer service customer experience. >> You know, that's an interesting point Gautam brings up, too, because support is an issue too. We all talk about when you break these things apart, it creates integration points that you need to manage, right? But there's also, so the support aspect of it. So imagine if you will, you had one vendor, you have an outage, you call that one vendor, one necktie to choke, right, for accountability for the network. Now you have four or five vendors that you have to work. You get a lot of finger pointing. So at least at the infrastructure layer, right? Dell takes first call support for both the hardware infrastructure and the Wind River cloud infrastructure for both. And we are training and spinning them up to support, but we're always behind them of course as well. >> Can you give us a favorite customer example of- that really articulates the value of the partnership and the technologies that it's delivering to customers? >> Well, Infra Block- >> (indistinct) >> Is quite new, and we do have our first customer which is LG U plus, which was announced yesterday. Out of Korea, small customer, but a very important one. Okay, and I think they saw the value of the integrated system. They don't have the (indistinct) expertise and they're leveraging Dell and Wind River in order to make that happen. But I always also say historically before this new offering was Vodafone, right? Vodafone is a leader in Europe in terms of Open RAN, been very- Yago and Paco have been very vocal about what they're doing in Open RAN, and Dell and Wind River have been there with them every step of the way. And that's what I would say, kind of, led up to where we are today. We learned from engagements like Vodafone and I think KDDI as well. And it got us where we are today and understanding what the operators need and what the impediments are. And this directly addresses that. >> Those are two very different examples. You were talking about TCO before. I mean, so the earlier example is, that's an example to me of a disruptor. They'll take some chances, you know, maybe not as focused on TCO, of course they're concerned about it. Vodafone I would think very concerned about TCO. But I'm inferring from your comments that you're trying to get the industry, you're trying to check the TCO box, get there. And then move on to higher levels of value monetization. The TCO is going to come down to how many humans it takes to run the network, is it not, is that- >> Well a lot of, okay- >> Or is it devices- >> So the big one now, particularly with Vodafone, is energy cost, right? >> Of course, greening the network. >> Two-thirds of the energy consumption in RAN is the the Radio Access Network. Okay, the OPEX, right? So any reductions, even if they're 5% or 10%, can save tens or hundreds of millions of dollars. So we do things creatively with Dell to understand if there's a lot of traffic at the cell site and if it's not, we will change the C state or P state of the server, which basically spins it down, so it's not consuming power. But that's just at the infrastructure layer. Where this gets really powerful is working with the RAN vendors like Samsung and Ericson and others, and taking data from the traffic information there, applying algorithms to that in AI to shut it down and spin it back up as needed. 'Cause the idea is you don't want that thing powered up if there's no traffic on it. >> Well there's a sustainability, ESG, benefit to that, right? >> Yes. >> And, and it's very compute intensive. >> A hundred percent. >> Which is great for Dell. But at the same time, if you're not able to manage that power consumption, the whole thing fails. I mean it's, because there's going to be so much data, and such a intense requirement. So this is a huge issue. Okay, so Scott, you're saying that in the TCO equation, a big chunk is energy consumption? >> On the OPEX piece. Now there's also the CapEx, right? And Open RAN solutions are now, what we've heard from our customers today, are they're roughly at parity. 'Cause you can do things like repurpose servers after the useful life for a lower demand application which helps the TCO, right? Then you have situations like Juniper, where you can take, now software that runs on the same device, eliminating at a whole other device at the cell site. So we're not just taking a server and software point of view, we're taking a whole cell site point of view as it relates to both CapEx and OPEX. >> And then once that infrastructure it really gets adopted, that's when the innovation occurs. The ecosystem comes in. Developers now start to think of new applications that we haven't thought of yet. >> Gautam: Exactly. >> And that's where, that's going to force the traditional carriers to respond. They're responding, but they're doing so very carefully right now, it's understandable why. >> Yeah, and I think you're already seeing some news in the, I mean Nokia's announcement yesterday with the rebranding, et cetera. That's all positive momentum in my opinion, right? >> What'd you think of the logo? >> I love the logo. >> I liked it too. (group laughs) >> It was beautiful. >> I thought it was good. You had the connectivity down below, You need pipes, right? >> Exactly. >> But you had this sort of cool letters, and then the the pink horizon or pinkish, it was like (Scott laughs) endless opportunity. It was good, I thought it was well thought out. >> Exactly. >> Well, you pick up on an interesting point there, and what we're seeing, like advanced carriers like Dish, who has one of the true Open RAN networks, publishing APIs for programmers to build in their 5G network as part of the application. But we're also seeing the network equipment providers also enable carriers do that, 'cause carriers historically have not been advanced in that way. So there is a real recognition that in order for these networks to monetize new use cases, they need to be programmable, and they need to publish standard APIs, so you can access the 5G network capabilities through software. >> Yeah, and the problem from the carriers, there's not enough APIs that the carriers have produced yet. So that's where the ecosystem comes in, is going to >> A hundred percent >> I think there's eight APIs that are published out of the traditional carriers, which is, I mean there's got to be 8,000 for a marketplace. So that's where the open ecosystem really has the advantage. >> That's right. >> That's right. >> That's right. >> Yeah. >> So it all makes sense on paper, now you just, you got a lot of work to do. >> We got to deliver. Yeah, we launched it today. We got to get some like-minded partners and customers to come together. You'll start seeing results coming out of this hopefully soon, and we'll talk more about it over time. >> Dave: Great Awesome, thanks for sharing with us. >> Excellent. Guys, thank you for sharing, stopping by, sharing what's going on with Dell and Wind River, and why the opportunity's in it for customers and the technological evolution. We appreciate it, you'll have to come back, give us an update. >> Our pleasure, thanks for having us. (Group talks over each other) >> All right, thanks guys >> Appreciate it. >> For our guests and for Dave Vellante, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching theCUBE, Live from MWC23 in Barcelona. theCUBE is the leader in live tech coverage. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. the theme of this conference and it's compulsory to have and Scott Walker, Vice President and let's start with you, unpack it. One of the things we are very excited and the theme of the show, Velocity, they have to have a, you know, And that's one of the reasons the operator doesn't have to do that. from the developers, you and adopting the innovation So instead of at the far edge cell site, that that still have to be determined. Or the Mars Rover or and flexibility to and not gain weight. I come from the public cloud world. and that that drove the that the organizations and the Wind River cloud of the integrated system. I mean, so the earlier example is, and taking data from the But at the same time, if that runs on the same device, Developers now start to think the traditional carriers to respond. Yeah, and I think you're I liked it too. You had the connectivity down below, and then the the pink horizon or pinkish, and they need to publish Yeah, and the problem I mean there's got to be now you just, you got a lot of work to do. and customers to come together. thanks for sharing with us. for customers and the Our pleasure, thanks for having us. Live from MWC23 in Barcelona.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Samsung | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Erickson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Scott Walker | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Scott | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mavenir | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Parallel Wireless | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gautam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Korea | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
tens | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gautam Bhagra | PERSON | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
8,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aptiv | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Ericson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one vendor | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five vendors | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Wind Rivers | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
F-15 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Two-thirds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first call | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Manish Singh, Dell Technologies & Doug Wolff, Dell Technologies | MWC Barcelona 2023
>> Announcer: theCUBE's live coverage is made possible by funding from Dell Technologies, creating technologies that drive human progress. (upbeat music) >> Welcome to the Fira in Barcelona, everybody. This is theCUBE's coverage of MWC 23, day one of that coverage. We have four days of wall-to-wall action going on, the place is going crazy. I'm here with Dave Nicholson, Lisa Martin is also in the house. Today's ecosystem day, and we're really excited to have Manish Singh who's the CTO of the Telecom Systems Business unit at Dell Technologies. He's joined by Doug Wolf who's the head of strategy for the Telecom Systems Business unit at Dell. Gents, welcome. What a show. I mean really the first major MWC or used to be Mobile World Congress since you guys have launched your telecom business, you kind of did that sort of in the Covid transition, but really exciting, obviously a huge, huge venue to match the huge market. So Manish, how did you guys get into this? What did you see? What was the overall thinking to get Dell into this business? >> Manish: Yeah, well, I mean just to start with you know, if you look at the telecom ecosystem today, the service providers in particular, they are looking for network transformation, driving more disaggregation into their network so that they can get better utilization of the infrastructure, but then also get more agility, more cloud native characteristics onto their, for their networks in particular. And then further on, it's important for them to really start to accelerate the pace of innovation on the networks itself, to start more supply chain diversity, that's one of the challenges that they've been having. And so there've been all these market forces that have been really getting these service providers to really start to transform the way they have built the infrastructure in the past, which was legacy monolithic architectures to more cloud native disaggregated. And from a Dell perspective, you know, that really gives us the permission to play, to really, given all the expertise on the work we have done in the IT with all the IT transformations to leverage all that expertise and bring that to the service providers and really help them in accelerating their network transformation. So that's where the journey started. We've been obviously ever since then working on expanding the product portfolio on our compute platforms to bring Teleco great compute platforms with more capabilities than we can talk about that. But then working with partners and building the ecosystem to again create this disaggregated and open ecosystem that will be more cloud native and really meet the objective that the service providers are after. >> Dave Vellante: Great, thank you. So, Doug the strategy obviously is to attack this market, as Manish said, from an open standpoint, that's sort of new territory. It's like a little bit like the wild, wild west. So maybe you could double click on what Manish was saying from a, from a strategy standpoint, yes, the Telecos need to be more flexible, they need to be more open, but they also need this reliability piece. So talk about that from a strategy standpoint of what you guys saw. >> Doug: Yeah, absolutely. As Manish mentioned, you know, Dell getting into open systems isn't something new. You know, Dell has been kind of playing in that world for years and years, but the opportunity in Telecom that came was opening of the RAN, the core network, the edge, all of these with 5G really created a wide opening for us. So we started developing products and solutions, you know, built our first Telecom grade servers for open RAN over the last year, we'll talk about those at the show. But you know, as, as Manish mentioned, an open ecosystem is new to Telecom. I've been in the Telecom business along with Manish for, you know, 25 plus years and this is a new thing that they're embarking on. So started with virtualization about five, six years ago, and now moving to cloud native architectures on the core, suddenly there's this need to have multiple parties partner really well, share specifications, and put that together for an operator to consume. And I think that's just the start of really where all the challenges are and the opportunities that we see. >> Where are we in this transition cycle? When the average consumer hears 5G, feels like it's been around for a long time because it was hyped beforehand. >> Doug: Yeah. >> If you're talking about moving to an open infrastructure model from a proprietary closed model, when is the opportunity for Dell to become part of that? Is it, are there specific sites that have already transitioned to 5G, therefore they've either made the decision to be open or not? Or are there places where the 5G transition has taken place, and they might then make a transition to open brand with 5G? Where, where are we in that cycle? What does the opportunity look like? >> I'll kind of take it from the typology of the operator, and I'm sure Manish will build on this, but if I look back on the core, started to get virtualized you know, back around 2015-16 with some of the lead operators like AT&T et cetera. So Dell has been partnering with those operators for some years. So it really, it's happening on the core, but it's moving with 5G to more of a cloud-like architecture, number one. And number two, they're going beyond just virtualizing the network. You know, they previously had used OpenStack and most of them are migrating to more of a cloud native architecture that Manish mentioned. And that is a bit different in terms of there's more software vendors in that ecosystem because the software is disaggregated also. So Dell's been playing in the core for a number of years, but we brought out new solutions we've announced at the show for the core. And the parts that are really starting that transition of maybe where the core was back in 2015 is on the RAN and on the edge in particular. >> Because NFV kind of predated the ascendancy of cloud. >> Exactly, yeah. >> Right, so it really didn't have the impact that people had hoped. And there's some, when you look back, 'cause it's not same wine, new bottle as the open systems movement, there are a lot of similarities but you know, you mentioned cloud, and cloud native, you really didn't have, back in the nineties, true engineered systems. You didn't really have AI that, you know, to speak of at the sort of volume of the data that we have. So Manish, from a CTO's perspective, how are you attacking some of those differences in bringing that to market? >> Manish: Yeah, I mean, I think you touched on some very important points there. So first of all, the duck's point, a lot of this transformation started in the core, right? And as the technology evolution progress, the opportunities opened up. It has now come into the edge and the radio access network as well, in particular with open RAN. And so when we talk about the disaggregation of the infrastructure from the software itself and an open ecosystem, this now starts to create the opportunity to accelerate innovation. And I really want to pick up on the point that you'd said on AI, for example. AI and machine learning bring a whole new set of capabilities and opportunities for these service providers to drive better optimization, better performance, better sustainability and energy efficiency on their infrastructure, on and on and on. But to really tap into these technologies, they really need to open that up to third parties implementation solutions that are coming up. And again, the end objective remains to accelerate that innovation. Now that said, all these things need to be brought together, right? And delivered and deployed in the network without any degradation in the KPIs and actually improving the performance on different vectors, right? So this is what the current state of play is. And with this aggregation I'm definitely a believer that all these new technologies, including AI, machine learning, and there's a whole area, host area of problems that can be solved and attacked and are actually getting attacked by applying AI and machine learning onto these networks. >> Open obviously is good. Nobody's ever going to, you know, argue that open is a bad thing. It's like democracy is a good thing, right? At least amongst us. And so, but, the RAN, the open RAN, has to be as reliable and performant, right, as these, closed networks. Or maybe not, maybe it doesn't have to be identical. Just has to be close enough in order for that tipping point to occur. Is that a fair summarization? What are you guys hearing from carriers in terms of their willingness to sort of put their toe in the water and, and what could we expect in terms of the maturity model of, of open RAN and adoption? >> Right, so I mean I think on, on performance that, that's a tough one. I think the operators will demand performance and you've seen experiments, you've really seen more of the Greenfield operators kind of launch. >> Okay. >> Doug: Open RAN or vRAN type solutions. >> So they're going to disrupt. >> Doug: Yeah, they're going to disrupt. >> Yeah. >> Doug: And there's flexibility in an open RAN architecture also for 5G that they, that they're interested in and I think the Brownfield operators are too, but let's say maybe the Greenfield jump first in terms of doing that from a mass deployment perspective. But I still think that it's going to be critical to meet very similar SLAs and end user performance. And, you know, I think that's where, you know, maturity of that model is what's required. I think Brownfield operators are conservative in terms of, you know, going with something they know, but the opportunities and the benefits of that architecture and building new flexible, potentially cost advantaged over time solutions, that's what the, where the real interest is going forward. >> And new services that you can introduce much more quickly. You know, the interesting thing about Dell to me, you don't compete with the carriers, the public cloud vendors though, the carriers are concerned about them sort of doing an end run on them. So you provide a potential partnership for the carriers that's non-threatening, right? 'Cause you're, you're an arms dealer, you're selling hardware and software, right? But, but how do you see that? Because we heard in the keynote today, one of the Teleco, I think it was the chairman of Telefonica said, you know, cloud guys can't do this alone. You know, they need, you know, this massive, you know, build out. And so, what do you think about that in terms of your relationship with the carriers not being threatening? I mean versus say potentially the cloud guys, who are also your partners, I understand, it's a really interesting dynamic, isn't it? >> Manish: Yeah, I mean I think, you know, I mean, the way I look at it, the carriers actually need someone like Dell who really come in who can bring in the right capabilities, the right infrastructure, but also bring in the ecosystem together and deliver a performance solution that they can deploy and that they can trust, number one. Number two, to your point on cloud, I mean, from a Dell perspective, you know, we announced our Dell Telecom Multicloud Foundation and as part of that last year in September, we announced what we call is the Dell Telecom Infrastructure Blocks. The first one we announced with Wind River, and this is, think of it as the, you know, hardware and the cashier all pre-integrated with lot of automation around it, factory integrated, you know, delivered to customers in an integrated model with all the licenses, everything. And so it starts to solve the day zero, day one, day two integration deployment and then lifecycle management for them. So to broaden the discussion, our view is it's a multicloud world, the future is multicloud where you can have different clouds which can be optimized for different workloads. So for example, while our work with Wind River initially was very focused on virtualization of the radio access network, we just announced our infrastructure block with Red Hat, which is very much targeted and optimized for core network and edge, right? So, you know, there are different workflows which will require different capabilities also. And so, you know, again, we are bringing those things to these service providers to again, bring those cloud characteristics and cloud native architecture for their network. >> And It's going to be hybrid, to your point. >> David N.: And you, just hit on something, you said cloud characteristics. >> Yeah. >> If you look at this through the lens of kind of the general world of IT, sometimes when people hear the word cloud, they immediately leap to the idea that it's a hyperscale cloud provider. In this scenario we're talking about radio towers that have intelligence living on them and physically at the base. And so the cloud characteristics that you're delivering might be living physically in these remote locations all over the place, is that correct? >> Yeah, I mean that, that's true. That will definitely happen over time. But I think, I think we've seen the hyperscalers enter, you know, public cloud providers, enter at the edge and they're dabbling maybe with private, but I think the public RAN is another further challenge. I think that maybe a little bit down the road for them. So I think that is a different characteristic that you're talking about managing the macro RAN environment. >> Manish: If I may just add one more perspective of this cloud, and I mean, again, the hyperscale cloud, right? I mean that world's been great when you can centralize a lot of compute capability and you can then start to, you know, do workload aggregation and use the infrastructure more efficient. When it comes to Telecom, it is inherently it distributed architecture where you have access, you talked about radio access, your port, and it is inherently distributed because it has to provide the coverage and capacity. And so, you know, it does require different kind of capabilities when you're going out and about, and this is where I was talking about things like, you know, we just talked, we just have been working on our bare metal orchestration, right? This is what we are bringing is a capability where you can actually have distributed infrastructure, you can deploy, you can actually manage, do lifecycle management, in a distributed multicloud form. So it does require, you know, different set of capabilities that need to be enabled. >> Some, when talking about cloud, would argue that it's always been information technology, it always will be information technology, and especially as what we might refer to as public cloud or hyperscale cloud providers, are delivering things essentially on premises. It's like, well, is that cloud? Because it feels like some of those players are going to be delivering physical infrastructure outside of their own data centers in order to address this. It seems the nature, the nature of the beast is that some of these things need to be distributed. So it seems perfectly situated for Dell. That's why you guys are both at Dell now and not working for other Telecom places, right? >> Exactly. Exactly, yes. >> It's definitely an exciting space. It's transformed, the networks are under transformation and I do think that Dell's very well positioned to, to really help the customers, the service providers in accelerating their transformation journey with an open ecosystem. >> Dave V.: You've got the brand, and the breadth, and the resources to actually attract an ecosystem. But I wonder if you could sort of take us through your strategy of ecosystem, the challenges that you've seen in developing that ecosystem and what the vision is that ultimately, what's the outcome going to be of that open ecosystem? >> Yeah, I can start. So maybe just to give you the big picture, right? I mean the big picture, is disaggregation with performance, right, TCO models to the service providers, right? And it starts at the infrastructure layer, builds on bringing these cloud capabilities, the cast layer, right? Bringing the right accelerators. All of this requires to pull the ecosystem. So give you an example on the infrastructure in a Teleco grade servers like XR8000 with Sapphire, the new intel processors that we've just announced, and an extended array of servers. These are Teleco grade, short depth, et cetera. You know, the Teleco great characteristic. Working with the partners like Marvel for bringing in the accelerators in there, that's important to again, drive the performance and optimize for the TCO. Working then with partners like Wind River, Red Hat, et cetera, to bring in the cast capabilities so you can start to see how this ecosystem starts to build up. And then very recently we announced our private 5G solution with AirSpan and Expeto on the core site. So bringing those workloads together. Similarly, we have an open RAN solution we announce with Fujitsu. So it's, it's open, it's disaggregated, but bringing all these together. And one of the last things I would say is, you know, to make all this happen and make all of these, we've also been putting together our OTEL, our open Telecom ecosystem lab, which is very much geared, really gives this open ecosystem a playground where they can come in and do all that heavy lifting, which is anyways required, to do the integration, optimization, and board. So put all these capabilities in place, but the end goal, the end vision again, is that cloud native disaggregated infrastructure that starts to innovate at the speed of software and scales at the speed of cloud. >> And this is different than the nineties. You didn't have something like OTEL back then, you know, you didn't have the developer ecosystem that you have today because on top of everything that you just said, Manish, are new workloads and new applications that are going to be developed. Doug, anything you'd add to what Manish said? >> Doug: Yeah, I mean, as Manish said, I think adding to the infrastructure layers, which are, you know, critical for us to, to help integrate, right? Because we kind of took a vertical Teleco stack and we've disaggregated it, and it's gotten a little bit more complex. So our Solutions Dell Technology infrastructure block, and our lab infrastructure with OTEL, helps put those pieces together. But without the software players in this, you know, that's what we really do, I think in OTEL. And that's just starting to grow. So integrating with those software providers with that integration is something that the operators need. So we fill a gap there in terms of either providing engineered solutions so they can readily build on or actually bringing in that software provider. And I think that's what you're going to see more from us going forward is just extending that ecosystem even further. More software players effectively. >> In thinking about O-RAN, are they, is it possible to have the low latency, the high performance, the reliability capabilities that carriers are used to and the flexibility? Or can you sort of prioritize one over the other from a go to market and rollout standpoint and optimize one, maybe get a foothold in the market? How do you see that balance? >> Manish: Oh the answer is absolutely yes you can have both We are on that journey, we are on that journey. This is where all these things I was talking about in terms of the right kind of accelerators, right kind of capabilities on the infrastructure, obviously retargeting the software, there are certain changes, et cetera that need to be done on the software itself to make it more cloud native. And then building all the surrounding capabilities around the CICD pipeline and all where it's not just day zero or day one that you're doing the cloud-like lifecycle management of this infrastructure. But the answer to your point, yes, absolutely. It's possible, the technology is there, and the ecosystem is coming together, and that's the direction. Now, are there challenges? Absolutely there are challenges, but directionally that's the direction the industry is moving to. >> Dave V.: I guess my question, Manish, is do they have to go in lockstep? Because I would argue that the public cloud when it first came out wasn't nearly as functional as what I could get from my own data center in terms of recovery, you know, backup and recovery is a perfect example and it took, you know, a decade plus to get there. But it was the flexibility, and the openness, and the developer affinity, the programmability, that attracted people. Do you see O-RAN following a similar path? Or does it, my question is does it have to have that carrier class reliability today? >> David N.: Everything on day one, does it have to have everything on day one? >> Yeah, I mean, I would say, you know, like again, the Greenfield operators I think we're, we're willing do a little bit more experimentation. I think the operators, Brownfield operators that have existing, you know, deployments, they're going to want to be closer. But I think there's room for innovation here. And clearly, you know, Manish came from, from Meta and we're, we've been very involved with TIP, we're very involved with the O-RAN alliance, and as Manish mentioned, with all those accelerators that we're working with on our infrastructure, that is a space that we're trying to help move the ball forward. So I think you're seeing deployments from mainstream operators, but it's maybe not in, you know, downtown New York deployment, they're more rural deployments. I think that's getting at, you know, kind of your question is there's maybe a little bit more flexibility there, they get to experiment with the technology and the flexibility and then I think it will start to evolve >> Dave V.: And that's where the disruption's going to come from, I think. >> David N.: Well, where was the first place you could get reliable 4K streaming of video content? It wasn't ABC, CBS, NBC. It was YouTube. >> Right. >> So is it possible that when you say Greenfield, are a lot of those going to be what we refer to as private 5G networks where someone may set up a private 5G network that has more functions and capabilities than the public network? >> That's exactly where I was going is that, you know, that that's why you're seeing us getting very active in 5G solutions that Manish mentioned with, you know, Expeto and AirSpan. There's more of those that we haven't publicly announced. So I think you'll be seeing more announcements from us, but that is really, you know, a new opportunity. And there's spectrum there also, right? I mean, there's public and private spectrum. We plan to work directly with the operators and do it in their spectrum when needed. But we also have solutions that will do it, you know, on non-public spectrum. >> So let's close out, oh go ahead. You you have something to add there? >> I'm just going to add one more point to Doug's point, right? Is if you look on the private 5G and the end customer, it's the enterprise, right? And they're, they're not a service provider. They're not a carrier. They're more used to deploying, you know, enterprise infrastructure, maintaining, managing that. So, you know, private 5G, especially with this open ecosystem and with all the open run capabilities, it naturally tends to, you know, blend itself very well to meet those requirements that the enterprise would have. >> And people should not think of private 5G as a sort of a replacement for wifi, right? It's to to deal with those, you know, intense situations that can afford the additional cost, but absolutely require the reliability and the performance and, you know, never go down type of scenario. Is that right? >> Doug: And low latencies usually, the primary characteristics, you know, for things like Industry 4.0 manufacturing requirements, those are tough SLAs. They're just, they're different than the operator SLAs for coverage and, you know, cell performance. They're now, you know, Five9 type characteristics, but on a manufacturing floor. >> That's why we don't use wifi on theCUBE to broadcast, we need a hard line. >> Yeah, but why wouldn't it replace wifi over time? I mean, you know, I still have a home phone number that's hardwired to align, but it goes to a voicemail. We don't even have handset anymore for it, yeah. >> I think, well, unless the cost can come down, but I think that wifi is flexible, it's cheap. It's, it's kind of perfect for that. >> Manish: And it's good technology. >> Dave V.: And it works great. >> David N.: For now, for now. >> Dave V.: But you wouldn't want it in those situations, and you're arguing that maybe. >> I'm saying eventually, what, put a sim in a device, I don't know, you know, but why not? >> Yeah, I mean, you know, and Dell offers, you know, from our laptop, you know, our client side, we do offer wifi, we do offer 4G and 5G solutions. And I think those, you know, it's a volume and scale issue, I think for the cost structure you're talking about. >> Manish: Come to our booth and see the connected laptop. >> Dave V.: Well let's, let's close on that. Why don't you guys talk a little bit about what you're going on at the show, I did go by the booth, you got a whole big lineup of servers. You got some, you know, cool devices going on. So give us the rundown and you know, let's end with the takeaways here. >> The simple rundown, a broad range of new powered servers, broad range addressing core, edge, RAN, optimized for those with all the different kind of acceleration capabilities. You can see that, you can see infrastructure blocks. These are with Wind River, with Red Hat. You can see OTEL, the open telecom ecosystem lab where all that playground, the integration, the real work, the real sausage makings happening. And then you will see some interesting solutions in terms of co-creation that we are doing, right? So you, you will see all of that and not to forget the connected laptops. >> Dave V.: Yeah, yeah, cool. >> Doug: Yeah and, we mentioned it before, but just to add on, I think, you know, for private 5G, you know, we've announced a few offers here at the show with partners. So with Expeto and AirSpan in particular, and I think, you know, I just want to emphasize the partnerships that we're doing. You know, we're doing some, you know, fundamental integration on infrastructure, bare metal and different options for the operators to get engineered systems. But building on that ecosystem is really, the move to cloud native is where Dell is trying to get in front of. And we're offering solutions and a much larger ecosystem to go after it. >> Dave V.: Great. Manish and Doug, thanks for coming on the program. It was great to have you, awesome discussion. >> Thank you for having us. >> Thanks for having us. >> All right, Dave Vellante for Dave Nicholson and Lisa Martin. We're seeing the disaggregation of the Teleco network into open ecosystems with integration from companies like Dell and others. Keep it right there for theCUBE's coverage of MWC 23. We'll be right back. (upbeat tech music)
SUMMARY :
that drive human progress. I mean really the first just to start with you know, of what you guys saw. for open RAN over the last year, When the average consumer hears 5G, and on the edge in particular. the ascendancy of cloud. in bringing that to market? So first of all, the duck's point, And so, but, the RAN, the open RAN, the Greenfield operators but the opportunities and the And new services that you and this is, think of it as the, you know, And It's going to be you said cloud characteristics. and physically at the base. you know, public cloud providers, So it does require, you know, the nature of the beast Exactly, yes. the service providers in and the resources to actually So maybe just to give you ecosystem that you have today something that the operators need. But the answer to your and it took, you know, a does it have to have that have existing, you know, deployments, going to come from, I think. you could get reliable 4K but that is really, you You you have something to add there? that the enterprise would have. It's to to deal with those, you know, the primary characteristics, you know, we need a hard line. I mean, you know, I still the cost can come down, Dave V.: But you wouldn't And I think those, you know, and see the connected laptop. So give us the rundown and you know, and not to forget the connected laptops. the move to cloud native is where Dell coming on the program. of the Teleco network
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Doug | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Fujitsu | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ABC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2015 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Doug Wolf | PERSON | 0.99+ |
OTEL | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CBS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Manish Singh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
NBC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David N. | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AT&T | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Marvel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AirSpan | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Brownfield | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telefonica | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Greenfield | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Teleco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Manish | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Expeto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
YouTube | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dave V. | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Manish | PERSON | 0.99+ |
MWC 23 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Doug Wolff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell Telecom Multicloud Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
25 plus years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
O-RAN | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telecos | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Breaking Analysis: MWC 2023 highlights telco transformation & the future of business
>> From the Cube Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from The Cube and ETR. This is "Breaking Analysis" with Dave Vellante. >> The world's leading telcos are trying to shed the stigma of being monopolies lacking innovation. Telcos have been great at operational efficiency and connectivity and living off of transmission, and the costs and expenses or revenue associated with that transmission. But in a world beyond telephone poles and basic wireless and mobile services, how will telcos modernize and become more agile and monetize new opportunities brought about by 5G and private wireless and a spate of new innovations and infrastructure, cloud data and apps? Hello, and welcome to this week's Wikibon CUBE Insights powered by ETR. In this breaking analysis and ahead of Mobile World Congress or now, MWC23, we explore the evolution of the telco business and how the industry is in many ways, mimicking transformations that took place decades ago in enterprise IT. We'll model some of the traditional enterprise vendors using ETR data and investigate how they're faring in the telecommunications sector, and we'll pose some of the key issues facing the industry this decade. First, let's take a look at what the GSMA has in store for MWC23. GSMA is the host of what used to be called Mobile World Congress. They've set the theme for this year's event as "Velocity" and they've rebranded MWC to reflect the fact that mobile technology is only one part of the story. MWC has become one of the world's premier events highlighting innovations not only in Telco, mobile and 5G, but the collision between cloud, infrastructure, apps, private networks, smart industries, machine intelligence, and AI, and more. MWC comprises an enormous ecosystem of service providers, technology companies, and firms from virtually every industry including sports and entertainment. And as well, GSMA, along with its venue partner at the Fira Barcelona, have placed a major emphasis on sustainability and public and private partnerships. Virtually every industry will be represented at the event because every industry is impacted by the trends and opportunities in this space. GSMA has said it expects 80,000 attendees at MWC this year, not quite back to 2019 levels, but trending in that direction. Of course, attendance from Chinese participants has historically been very high at the show, and obviously the continued travel issues from that region are affecting the overall attendance, but still very strong. And despite these concerns, Huawei, the giant Chinese technology company. has the largest physical presence of any exhibitor at the show. And finally, GSMA estimates that more than $300 million in economic benefit will result from the event which takes place at the end of February and early March. And The Cube will be back at MWC this year with a major presence thanks to our anchor sponsor, Dell Technologies and other supporters of our content program, including Enterprise Web, ArcaOS, VMware, Snowflake, Cisco, AWS, and others. And one of the areas we're interested in exploring is the evolution of the telco stack. It's a topic that's often talked about and one that we've observed taking place in the 1990s when the vertically integrated IBM mainframe monopoly gave way to a disintegrated and horizontal industry structure. And in many ways, the same thing is happening today in telecommunications, which is shown on the left-hand side of this diagram. Historically, telcos have relied on a hardened, integrated, and incredibly reliable, and secure set of hardware and software services that have been fully vetted and tested, and certified, and relied upon for decades. And at the top of that stack on the left are the crown jewels of the telco stack, the operational support systems and the business support systems. For the OSS, we're talking about things like network management, network operations, service delivery, quality of service, fulfillment assurance, and things like that. For the BSS systems, these refer to customer-facing elements of the stack, like revenue, order management, what products they sell, billing, and customer service. And what we're seeing is telcos have been really good at operational efficiency and making money off of transport and connectivity, but they've lacked the innovation in services and applications. They own the pipes and that works well, but others, be the over-the-top content companies, or private network providers and increasingly, cloud providers have been able to bypass the telcos, reach around them, if you will, and drive innovation. And so, the right-most diagram speaks to the need to disaggregate pieces of the stack. And while the similarities to the 1990s in enterprise IT are greater than the differences, there are things that are different. For example, the granularity of hardware infrastructure will not likely be as high where competition occurred back in the 90s at every layer of the value chain with very little infrastructure integration. That of course changed in the 2010s with converged infrastructure and hyper-converged and also software defined. So, that's one difference. And the advent of cloud, containers, microservices, and AI, none of that was really a major factor in the disintegration of legacy IT. And that probably means that disruptors can move even faster than did the likes of Intel and Microsoft, Oracle, Cisco, and the Seagates of the 1990s. As well, while many of the products and services will come from traditional enterprise IT names like Dell, HPE, Cisco, Red Hat, VMware, AWS, Microsoft, Google, et cetera, many of the names are going to be different and come from traditional network equipment providers. These are names like Ericsson and Huawei, and Nokia, and other names, like Wind River, and Rakuten, and Dish Networks. And there are enormous opportunities in data to help telecom companies and their competitors go beyond telemetry data into more advanced analytics and data monetization. There's also going to be an entirely new set of apps based on the workloads and use cases ranging from hospitals, sports arenas, race tracks, shipping ports, you name it. Virtually every vertical will participate in this transformation as the industry evolves its focus toward innovation, agility, and open ecosystems. Now remember, this is not a binary state. There are going to be greenfield companies disrupting the apple cart, but the incumbent telcos are going to have to continue to ensure newer systems work with their legacy infrastructure, in their OSS and BSS existing systems. And as we know, this is not going to be an overnight task. Integration is a difficult thing, transformations, migrations. So that's what makes this all so interesting because others can come in with Greenfield and potentially disrupt. There'll be interesting partnerships and ecosystems will form and coalitions will also form. Now, we mentioned that several traditional enterprise companies are or will be playing in this space. Now, ETR doesn't have a ton of data on specific telecom equipment and software providers, but it does have some interesting data that we cut for this breaking analysis. What we're showing here in this graphic is some of the names that we've followed over the years and how they're faring. Specifically, we did the cut within the telco sector. So the Y-axis here shows net score or spending velocity. And the horizontal axis, that shows the presence or pervasiveness in the data set. And that table insert in the upper left, that informs as to how the dots are plotted. You know, the two columns there, net score and the ends. And that red-dotted line, that horizontal line at 40%, that is an indicator of a highly elevated level. Anything above that, we consider quite outstanding. And what we'll do now is we'll comment on some of the cohorts and share with you how they're doing in telecommunications, and that sector, that vertical relative to their position overall in the data set. Let's start with the public cloud players. They're prominent in every industry. Telcos, telecommunications is no exception and it's quite an interesting cohort here. On the one hand, they can help telecommunication firms modernize and become more agile by eliminating the heavy lifting and you know, all the cloud, you know, value prop, data center costs, and the cloud benefits. At the same time, public cloud players are bringing their services to the edge, building out their own global networks and are a disruptive force to traditional telcos. All right, let's talk about Azure first. Their net score is basically identical to telco relative to its overall average. AWS's net score is higher in telco by just a few percentage points. Google Cloud platform is eight percentage points higher in telco with a 53% net score. So all three hyperscalers have an equal or stronger presence in telco than their average overall. Okay, let's look at the traditional enterprise hardware and software infrastructure cohort. Dell, Cisco, HPE, Red Hat, VMware, and Oracle. We've highlighted in this chart just as sort of indicators or proxies. Dell's net score's 10 percentage points higher in telco than its overall average. Interesting. Cisco's is a bit higher. HPE's is actually lower by about nine percentage points in the ETR survey, and VMware's is lower by about four percentage points. Now, Red Hat is really interesting. OpenStack, as we've previously reported is popular with telcos who want to build out their own private cloud. And the data shows that Red Hat OpenStack's net score is 15 percentage points higher in the telco sector than its overall average. OpenShift, on the other hand, has a net score that's four percentage points lower in telco than its overall average. So this to us talks to the pace of adoption of microservices and containers. You know, it's going to happen, but it's going to happen more slowly. Finally, Oracle's spending momentum is somewhat lower in the sector than its average, despite the firm having a decent telco business. IBM and Accenture, heavy services companies are both lower in this sector than their average. And real quickly, snowflake's net score is much lower by about 12 percentage points relative to its very high average net score of 62%. But we look for them to be a player in this space as telcos need to modernize their analytics stack and share data in a governed manner. Databricks' net score is also much lower than its average by about 13 points. And same, I would expect them to be a player as open architectures and cloud gains steam in telco. All right, let's close out now on what we're going to be talking about at MWC23 and some of the key issues that we'll be unpacking. We've talked about stack disaggregation in this breaking analysis, but the key here will be the pace at which it will reach the operational efficiency and reliability of closed stacks. Telcos, you know, in a large part, they're engineering heavy firms and much of their work takes place, kind of in the basement, in the dark. It's not really a big public hype machine, and they tend to move slowly and cautiously. While they understand the importance of agility, they're going to be careful because, you know, it's in their DNA. And so at the same time, if they don't move fast enough, they're going to get hurt and disrupted by competitors. So that's going to be a topic of conversation, and we'll be looking for proof points. And the other comment I'll make is around integration. Telcos because of their conservatism will benefit from better testing and those firms that can innovate on the testing front and have labs and certifications and innovate at that level, with an ecosystem are going to be in a better position. Because open sometimes means wild west. So the more players like Dell, HPE, Cisco, Red Hat, et cetera, that do that and align with their ecosystems and provide those resources, the faster adoption is going to go. So we'll be looking for, you know, who's actually doing that, Open RAN or Radio Access Networks. That fits in this discussion because O-RAN is an emerging network architecture. It essentially enables the use of open technologies from an ecosystem and over time, look at O-RAN is going to be open, but the questions, you know, a lot of questions remain as to when it will be able to deliver the operational efficiency of traditional RAN. Got some interesting dynamics going on. Rakuten is a company that's working hard on this problem, really focusing on operational efficiency. Then you got Dish Networks. They're also embracing O-RAN. They're coming at it more from service innovation. So that's something that we'll be monitoring and unpacking. We're going to look at cloud as a disruptor. On the one hand, cloud can help drive agility, as we said earlier and optionality, and innovation for incumbent telcos. But the flip side is going to also do the same for startups trying to disrupt and cloud attracts startups. While some of the telcos are actually embracing the cloud, many are being cautious. So that's going to be an interesting topic of discussion. And there's private wireless networks and 5G, and hyperlocal private networks, they're being deployed, you know, at the edge. This idea of open edge is also a really hot topic and this trend is going to accelerate. You know, the importance here is that the use cases are going to be widely varied. The needs of a hospital are going to be different than those of a sports venue are different from a remote drilling location, and energy or a concert venue. Things like real-time AI inference and data flows are going to bring new services and monetization opportunities. And many firms are going to be bypassing traditional telecommunications networks to build these out. Satellites as well, we're going to see, you know, in this decade, you're going to have, you're going to look down at Google Earth and you're going to see real-time. You know, today you see snapshots and so, lots of innovations going in that space. So how is this going to disrupt industries and traditional industry structures? Now, as always, we'll be looking at data angles, right? 'Cause it's in The Cube's DNA to follow the data and what opportunities and risks data brings. The Cube is going to be on location at MWC23 at the end of the month. We got a great set. We're in the walkway between halls four and five, right in Congress Square, it's booths CS60. So we'll have a full, they're called Stan CS60. We have a full schedule. I'm going to be there with Lisa Martin, Dave Nicholson and the entire Cube crew, so don't forget to stop by. All right, that's a wrap. I want to thank Alex Myerson, who's on production and manages the podcast, Ken Schiffman as well. Kristin Martin and Cheryl Knight help get the word out on social media and in our newsletters. And Rob Hof is our editor-in-chief over at Silicon Angle, does some great stuff for us. Thank you all. Remember, all these episodes are available as podcasts. Wherever you listen, just search "Breaking Analysis" podcasts I publish each week on wikibon.com and silicon angle.com. And all the video content is available on demand at thecube.net. You can email me directly at david.vellante@silicon angle.com. You can DM me at dvellante or comment on my LinkedIn post. Please do check out etr.ai for the best survey data in the enterprise tech business. This is Dave Vellante for The Cube Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching and we'll see you at Mobile World Congress, and/or at next time on "Breaking Analysis." (bright music) (bright music fades)
SUMMARY :
From the Cube Studios and some of the key issues
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ericsson | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Huawei | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kristin Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rakuten | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rob Hof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
GSMA | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
53% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
more than $300 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Congress Square | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dish Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2010s | DATE | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
david.vellante@silicon angle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
MWC23 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
1990s | DATE | 0.99+ |
62% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
two columns | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Seagates | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
early March | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thecube.net | OTHER | 0.99+ |
MWC | EVENT | 0.99+ |
ETR | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
Cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one part | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Chinese | OTHER | 0.98+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
decades ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
90s | DATE | 0.97+ |
about 13 points | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Mobile World Congress Preview 2023 | Mobile World Congress 2023
(electronic music) (graphics whooshing) (graphics tinkling) >> Telecommunications is well north of a trillion-dollar business globally, that provides critical services on which virtually everyone on the planet relies. Dramatic changes are occurring in the sector, and one of the most important dimensions of this change is the underlying infrastructure that powers global telecommunications networks. Telcos have been thawing out, if you will, they're frozen infrastructure, modernizing. They're opening up, they're disaggregating their infrastructure, separating, for example, the control plane from the data plane, and adopting open standards. Telco infrastructure is becoming software-defined. And leading telcos are adopting cloud native microservices to help make developers more productive, so they can respond more quickly to market changes. They're embracing technology consumption models, and selectively leveraging the cloud where it makes sense. And these changes are being driven by market forces, the root of which stem from customer demand. So from a customer's perspective, they want services, and they want them fast. Meaning, not only at high speeds, but also they want them now. Customers want the latest, the greatest, and they want these services to be reliable and stable with high quality of service levels. And they want them to be highly cost-effective. Hello and welcome to this preview of Mobile World Congress 2023. My name is Dave Vellante, and at this year's event, theCUBE has a major presence at the show made possible by Dell Technologies, and with me to unpack the trends in telco, and look ahead to MWC23 are Dennis Hoffman, he's the Senior Vice President and General Manager of Dell's telecom business, and Aaron Chaisson, who is the Vice President of Telecom and Edge Solutions Marketing at Dell Technologies, gentlemen, welcome, thanks so much for spending some time with me. >> Thank you, Dave. >> Thanks, glad to be here. >> So, Dennis, let's start with you. Telcos in recent history have been slow to deliver and to monetize new services, and a large part because their purpose-built infrastructure could been somewhat of a barrier to responding to all these market forces. In many ways, this is what makes telecoms, really this market so exciting. So from your perspective, where is the action in this space? >> Yeah, the action Dave is kind of all over the place, partly because it's an ecosystem play. I think it's been, as you point out, the disaggregation trend has been going on for a while. The opportunity's been clear, but it has taken a few years to get all of the vendors, and all of the components that make up a solution, as well as the operators themselves, to a point where we can start putting this stuff together, and actually achieving some of the promise. >> So Aaron, for those who might not be as familiar with Dell's a activities in this area, here we are just ahead of Mobile World Congress, it's the largest event for telecoms, what should people know about Dell? And what's the key message to this industry? >> Sure, yeah, I think everybody knows that there's a lot of innovation that's been happening in the industry of late. One of the major trends that we're seeing is that shift from more of a vertically-integrated technology stack, to more of a disaggregated set of solutions, and that trend has actually created a ton of innovation that's happening across the industry, or along technology vendors and providers, the telecoms themselves. And so, one of the things that Dell's really looking to do is, as Dennis talked about, is build out a really strong ecosystem of partners and vendors that we're working closely together to be able to collaborate on new technologies, new capabilities that are solving challenges that the networks are seeing today. Be able to create new solutions built on those in order to be able to bring new value to the industry. And then finally, we want to help both partners, as well as our CSP providers activate those changes, so that they can bring new solutions to market, to be able to serve their customers. And so, the key areas that we're really focusing on with our customers is, technologies to help modernize the network, to be able to capitalize on the value of open architectures, and bring price performance to what they're expecting, and availability that they're expecting today. And then also, partner with the lines of business to be able to take these new capabilities, produce new solutions, and then deliver new value to their customers. >> Great, thank you, Aaron. So Dennis, you and I, known you for a number of years. I've watched you, you're are a trend spotter. You're a strategic thinker. I love now the fact that you're running a business that you had to go out and analyze, and now you got to make it happen. So, how would you describe Dell's strategy in this market? >> Well, it's really two things. And I appreciate the comment, I'm not sure how much of a trend spotter I am, but I certainly enjoy, and I think I'm fascinated by what's going on in this industry right now. Our two main thrusts, Dave, are first round, trying to catalyze that ecosystem, be a force for pulling together a group of folks, vendors that have been flying in fairly loose formation for a couple of years, to deliver the kinds of solutions that move the needle forward, and produce the outcomes that our network operator customers can actually buy and consume, and deploy, and have them be supported. The other thing is, there's a couple of very key technology areas that need to be advanced here. This ends up being a much anticipated year in telecom. Because of the delivery of some open infrastructure solutions that have being developed for years. With the Intel Sapphire Rapids program coming to market, we've of course got some purpose-built solutions on top of that for telecommunications networks. Some expanded partnerships in the area of multi-cloud infrastructure. And so, I would say the second main thrust is, we've got to bring some intellectual property to the party. It's not just about pulling the ecosystem together. But those two things together really form the twin thrusts of our strategy. >> Okay, so as you point out, you obviously not going to go alone in this market, it's way too broad, there's so many routes to market, partnerships, obviously very, very important. So, can you share a little bit more about the ecosystem and partners, maybe give some examples of some of the key partners that you'd be highlighting or working with, maybe at Mobile World Congress, or other activities this year? >> Yeah, absolutely. As Aaron touched on, I'm a visual thinker. The way I think about this thing is a very, very vertical architecture is tipping sideways. It's becoming horizontal. And all of the layers of that horizontal architecture are really where the partnerships are at. So, let's start at the bottom, silicon. The silicon ecosystem is very much focused on this market. And producing very specific products to enable open, high performance telecom networks. That's both in the form of host processors, as well as accelerators. One layer up, of course, is the stuff that we're known for, subsystems, compute storage, the hardware infrastructure that forms the foundation for telco clouds. A layer above that, all of the cloud software layer, the virtualization and containerization software, and all of the usual suspects there, all of whom are very good partners of ours, and we're looking to expand that pretty broadly this year. And then at the top of the layer cake, all of the network functions, all of the VNF's and CNF's that were once kind of the top of proprietary stacks, that are now opening up and being delivered, as well-formed containers that can run on these clouds. So, we're focusing on all of those, if you will, product partnerships, and there is a services wrapper around all of it. The systems integration necessary to make these systems part of a carrier's network, which of course, has been running for a long time, and needs to be integrated with in a very specific way. And so, all of that, together kind of forms the ecosystem, all of those are partners, and we're really excited about being at the heart of it. >> Interesting, it's not like we've never seen this movie before, which is, it's sort of repeating itself in telco. Aaron, you heard my little intro up front about the need to modernize infrastructure, I wonder if I could touch on another major trend, which we're seeing is the cloud, and I'm talkin' about not only public, but private and hybrid cloud. The public cloud is an opportunity, but it's also a threat for telcos. Telcom providers are lookin' to the public cloud for specific use cases, you think about like bursting for an iPhone launch or whatever. But at the same time, these cloud vendors, they're sort of competing with telcos. They're providing local zones, for example, sometimes trying to do an end run on the telco connectivity services, so telecom companies, they have to find the right balance between what they own and what they rent. And I wonder if you could add some color as to what you see in the market and what Dell specifically is doing to support these trends. >> Yeah, and I think the most important thing is what we're seeing, as you said, is these aren't things that we haven't seen before. And I think that telecom is really going through their own set of cloud transformations, and so, one of the hot topics in the industry now is, what is telco cloud? And what does that look like going forward? And it's going to be, as you said, a combination of services that they offer, services that they leverage. But at the end of the day, it's going to help them modernize how they deliver telecommunication services to their customers, and then provide value added services on top of that. From a Dell perspective, we're really providing the technologies to provide the underpinnings to lay a foundation on which that network can be built, whether that's best of breed servers that are built in design for the telecom environments. Recently, we announced our Infer block program, in partnering with virtualization providers, to be able to provide engineered systems that dramatically simplify how our customers can deploy, manage, and lifecycle manage throughout day two operations, an entire cloud environment. And whether they're using Red Hat, whether they're using Wind River, or VMware, or other virtualization layers, they can deploy the right virtualization layer at the right part of their network to support the applications they're looking to drive. And Dell is looking to solve how they simplify and manage all of that, both from a hardware, as well as on management software perspective. So, this is really what Dell's doing to, again, partner with the broader technology community, to help make that telco cloud a reality. >> Aaron, let's stay here for a second, I'm interested in some of the use cases that you're going after with customers. You've got Edge infrastructure, remote work, 5G, where's security fit, what are the focus areas for Dell, and can we double click on that a little bit? >> Yeah, I mean, I think there's two main areas of telecommunication industry that we're talking to. One, we've really been talking about the sort of the network buyer, how do they modernize the core, the network Edge, the RAN capabilities to deliver traditional telecommunication services, and modernize that as they move into 5G and beyond. I think the other side of the business is, telecoms are really looking from a line of business perspective to figure out how do they monetize that network, and be able to deliver value added services to their enterprise customers on top of these new networks. So, you were just touching on a couple of things that are really critical. In the enterprise space, AI and IoT is driving a tremendous amount of innovation out there, and there's a need for being able to support and manage Edge compute at scale, be able to provide connectivity, like private mobility, and 4G and 5G, being able to support things like mobile workforces and client capabilities, to be able to access these devices that are around all of these Edge environments of the enterprises. And telecoms are seeing as that, as an opportunity for them to not only provide connectivity, but how do they extend their cloud out into these enterprise environments with compute, with connectivity, with client and connectivity resources, and even also provide protection for those environments as well. So, these are areas that Dell is historically very strong at. Being able to provide compute, be able to provide connectivity, and being able to provide data protection and client services, we are looking to work closely with lines of businesses to be able to develop solutions that they can bring to market in combination with us, to be able to serve their end user customers and their enterprises. So, those are really the two key areas, not only network buyer, but being able to enable the lines of business to go and capitalize on the services they're developing for their customers. >> I think that line of business aspect is key, I mean, the telcos have had to sit back and provide the plumbing, cost per bit goes down, data consumption going through the roof, all the over at the top guys have had the field day with the data, and the customer relationships, and now it's almost like the revenge (chuckles) of the telcos. Dennis, I wonder if we could talk about the future. What can we expect in the years ahead from Dell, if you break out the binoculars a little bit. >> Yeah, I think you hit it earlier. We've seen the movie before. This has happened in the IT data center. We went from proprietary vertical solutions to horizontal open systems. We went from client server to software-defined open hardware cloud native. And the trend is likely to be exactly that, in the telecom industry because that's what the operators want. They're not naive to what's happened in the IT data center, they all run very large data centers. And they're trying to get some of the scale economies. Some of the agility, the cost of ownership benefits for the reasons Aaron just discussed. It's clear as you point out, this industry's been really defined by the inability to stop investing, and the difficulty to monetize that investment. And I think now, everybody's looking at this 5G, and frankly, 5G plus 6G, and beyond, as the opportunity to really go get a chunk of that revenue, and Enterprise Edge is the target. >> And 5G is touching so many industries, and that kind of brings me, Aaron into Mobile World Congress. I mean, you look at the floor layout, it's amazing. You got Industry 4.0, you've got our traditional industry and telco colliding. There's public policy. So, give us a teaser to Mobile World Congress 23, what's on deck at the show from Dell? >> Yeah, we're really excited about Mobile World Congress. This, as you know, is a massive event for the industry every year. And it's really the event that the whole industry uses to kick off this coming year. So, we're going to be using this obviously to talk to our customers and our partners about what Dell's looking to do, and what we're innovating on right now, and what we're looking to partner with them around. In the front of the house, we're going to be doin', we're going to be highlighting 13 different solutions and demonstrations to be able to show our customers what we're doing today, and show them the use cases, and put into action, so they get to actually look and feel, and touch, and experience what it is that we're working around. Obviously, meetings are important, everybody knows Mobile World Congress is the place to get those meetings and kickoff for the year. So, we're going to have, we're lookin' at several hundred meetings, hundreds of meetings that we're going to be lookin' to have across the industry with our customers and partners in the broader community. And of course, we've also got technology that's going to be in a variety of different partner spaces as well. So, you can come and see us in hall three, but we're also going to have technologies, kind of spread all over the floor. And of course, there's always theCUBE. You're going to be able to see us live all four days, all day, every day. You're going to be hearing our executives, our partners, our customers, talk about what Dell is doing to innovate in the industry, and how we're looking to leverage the broader, open ecosystem to be able to transform the network, and what we're lookin' to do. So, in that space, we're going to be focusing on what we're doing from an ecosystem perspective, our infrastructure focus. We'll be talking about what we're doing to support telco cloud transformation. And then finally, as we talked about earlier, how are we helping the lines of business within our telecoms monetize the opportunity? So, these are all different things we're really excited to be focusing on, and look forward to the event next month. >> Yeah, it's going to be awesome in Barcelona at the FITA, as you say, Dell's big presence in hall three, Orange is in there, Deutsche Telecom, Intel's in hall three. VMware's there, Nokia, Vodafone, you got some great things to see there. Check that out, and of course, theCUBE, we are super excited to be collaborating with you, we got a great setup. We're in the walkway right between halls four and five, right across from the government of Catalonia, who are the host partners for the event, so there's going to be a ton of action there. Guys, can't wait to see you there, really appreciate your time today. >> Great, thanks. >> Alright, Mobile World Congress, theCUBE's coverage starts on February 27th right after the keynotes. So, first thing in the morning, east coast time, we'll be broadcasting is, Aaron said all week, Monday through Thursday in the show floor, check that out at thecube.net. siliconangle.com has all the written coverage, and go to dell.com, see what's happenin' there, have all the action from the event. Don't miss us, this is Dave Vellante, we'll see you there. (electronic music)
SUMMARY :
and one of the most important and to monetize new and all of the components the network, to be able to capitalize on I love now the fact that Because of the delivery of some open examples of some of the key and all of the usual suspects there, about the need to the applications they're looking to drive. I'm interested in some of the use cases the lines of business to go and capitalize I mean, the telcos have had to sit back and the difficulty to and that kind of brings me, Aaron and kickoff for the year. awesome in Barcelona at the FITA, and go to dell.com, see
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aaron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Aaron Chaisson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
February 27th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Orange | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Deutsche Telecom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first round | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
next month | DATE | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
13 different solutions | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
thecube.net. | OTHER | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Mobile World Congress 23 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
One layer | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
both partners | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Mobile World Congress 2023 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
MWC23 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
twin thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two key areas | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
two main thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
second main thrust | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.93+ |
Edge | TITLE | 0.92+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
a trillion-dollar | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Telcom | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
hall three | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
dell.com | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Mobile Word Congress Preview 2023 | Mobile Word Congress 2023
(upbeat music) >> Telecommunic^ations is well north of a trillion-dollar business globally that provides critical services on which virtually everyone on the planet relies. Dramatic changes are occurring in the sector, and one of the most important dimensions of this change is the underlying infrastructure that powers global telecommunications networks. Telcos have been thawing out, if you will, their frozen infrastructure, modernizing. They're opening up. They're disaggregating their infrastructure, separating, for example, the control plane from the data plane and adopting open standards. Telco infrastructure is becoming software-defined, and leading telcos are adopting cloud-native microservices to help make developers more productive, so they can respond more quickly to market changes. They're embracing technology consumption models and selectively leveraging the cloud where it makes sense, and these changes are being driven by market forces, the root of which stem from customer demand. So from a customer's perspective, they want services, and they want them fast, meaning not only at high speeds, but also they want them now. Customers want the latest, the greatest, and they want these services to be reliable and stable with high quality of service levels, and they want them to be highly cost effective. Hello and welcome to this preview of Mobile World Congress 2023. My name is Dave Vellante and at this year's event, theCUBE has a major presence at the show, made possible by Dell Technologies, and with me, to unpack the trends in Telco and look ahead to MWC 23, Dennis Hoffman. He's the senior vice-president and general manager of Dell's telecom business and Aaron Chaisson, who is the vice-president of telecom and edge solutions marketing at Dell Technologies. Gentlemen, welcome. Thanks so much for spending some time with me. >> Thank you, Dave. >> Thanks, glad to be here. So, Dennis, let's start with you. Telcos in recent history have been slow to deliver and to monetize new services, in a large part, because their purpose-built infrastructure can been somewhat of a barrier to respondent to these market forces. In many ways, this is what makes telecoms, really, this market, so exciting. So from your perspective, where is the action in this space? >> Yeah, the action, Dave, is kind of all over the place, partly because it's an ecosystem play. You know, I think it's been, as you point out, the disaggregation trend has been going on for a while. The opportunity's been clear, but it has taken a few years to get all of the vendors and all of the components that make up a solution, as well as the operators themselves, to a point where we can start putting this stuff together and actually achieving some of the promise. >> So, Aaron, for those who might not be as familiar with Dell's a activities in this area, you know, here we are just ahead of Mobile World Congress. It's the largest event for telecoms. What should people know about Dell, and what's the key message to this industry? >> Sure, yeah, I think everybody knows that there's a lot of innovation that's been happening in the industry of late. One of the major trends that we're seeing is that shift from more of a vertically-integrated technology stack to more of a disaggregated set of solutions, and that trend has actually created a ton of innovation that's happening across the industry, well, along technology vendors and providers, the telecoms themselves, and so one of the things that Dell's really looking to do is, as Dennis talked about, is build out a really strong ecosystem of partners and vendors that we're working closely together to be able to collaborate on new technologies, new capabilities, that are solving challenges that the networks are seeing today, be able to create new solutions built on those in order to be able to bring new value to the industry and then finally, we want to help both partners as well as our CSP providers activate those changes so that they can bring new solutions to market to be able to serve their customers, and so the key areas that we're really focusing on, with our customers, is technologies to help modernize the network to be able to capitalize on the value of open architectures and bring price performance to what they're expecting and availability that they're expecting today and then also partner with the lines of business to be able to take these new capabilities, produce new solutions and then deliver new value to their customers. >> Great, thank you, Aaron. So, Dennis, I have known you for a number of years. I've watched you. You are a trend spotter, and you're a strategic thinker, and I love now the fact that you're running a business that you had to go out and analyze, and now you got got to make it happen. So how would you describe Dell's strategy in this market? >> Well, it's really two things, and I appreciate the comment. I'm not sure how much of a trend spotter I am, but I certainly enjoy, and I think I'm fascinated by what's going on in this industry right now. Our two main thrusts, Dave, are, first round, trying to catalyze that ecosystem, you know, be a force for pulling together a group of folks, vendors, that have been flying in fairly loose formation for a couple of years to deliver the kinds of solutions that move the needle forward and produce the outcomes that our network-operator customers can actually buy, and consume, and deploy, and have them be supported. The other thing is there's a couple of very key technology areas that need to be advanced here. This ends up being a much anticipated year, in telecom, because of the delivery of some open infrastructure solutions that have been being developed for years, with the Intel Sapphire Rapids program coming to market. We've of course got some purpose-built solutions on top of that for telecommunications networks, some expanded partnerships in the area of multi-cloud infrastructure, and so I would say the second main thrust is we've got to bring some intellectual property to the party. It's not just about pulling the ecosystem together, but those two things together really form the twin thrusts of our strategy. >> Okay, so as you point out, you're obviously not going to go alone in this market. It's way too broad. There's so many routes to market, partnerships, obviously, very, very important. So can you share a little bit more about the ecosystem and partners, maybe give some examples of some of the key partners that you'd be highlighting or working with, maybe at Mobile World Congress or other activities this year? >> Yeah, absolutely. You know, as Aaron touched on. I'm a visual thinker. The way I think about this thing is a very, very vertical architecture is tipping sideways. It's becoming horizontal, and all of the layers of that horizontal architecture are really where the partnerships are at. So let's start at the bottom, silicon. The silicon ecosystem is very much focused on this market and producing very specific products to enable open, high-performance telecom networks. That's both in the form of host processors as well as accelerators. One layer up, of course, is the stuff that we're known for, subsystems, compute, storage, the hardware infrastructure that forms the foundation for telco clouds. A layer above that, all of the cloud software layer, the virtualization and containerization software and all of the usual suspects there, all of whom are very good partners of ours, and we're looking to expand that pretty broadly this year, and then at the top of the layer cake, all of the network functions, all of the VNFs and CNFs that were once kind of the top of proprietary stacks that are now opening up and being delivered as well-formed containers that can run on these clouds. So, you know, we're focusing on all of those, if you will, product partnerships, and there is a services wrapper around all of it, the systems integration necessary to make these systems part of a carrier's network, which, of course, has been running for a long time and needs to be integrated with in a very specific way, and so all of that together kind of forms the ecosystem. All of those are partners, and we're really excited about being at the heart of it. >> Interesting, it's not like we've never seen this movie before, which is sort of repeating itself in telco. Aaron, you heard my little intro up front about the need to modernize infrastructure. I wonder if I could touch on, you know, another major trend which we're seeing, is the cloud, and I'm talking about, not only public, but private and hybrid cloud. The public cloud is an opportunity, but it's also a threat for telcos. You know, telecom providers are looking to the public cloud for specific use cases. You think about, like, bursting for an iPhone launch or whatever but at the same time, these cloud vendors, they're sort of competing with telcos. They're providing, you know, local zones, for example, sometimes trying to do an end run on the telco connectivity services. So telecom companies, they have to find the right balance between what they own and what they rent, and I wonder if you could add some color as to what you see in the market and what Dell, specifically, is doing to support these trends. >> Yeah, I think the most important thing is what we're seeing, as you said, is these aren't things that we haven't seen before, and I think that telecom is really going through their own set of cloud transformations, and so one of the hot topics in the industry now is what is telco cloud and what does that look like going forward? And it's going to be a, as you said, a combination of services that they offer, services that they leverage, but at the end of the day, it's going to help them modernize how they deliver telecommunication services to their customers and then provide value-added services on top of that. From a Dell perspective, you know, we're really providing the technologies to provide the underpinnings to lay a foundation on which that network can be built, whether that's best-of-breed servers that are built and designed for the telecom environments. Recently we announced our, our Infra Block program in partnering with virtualization providers to be able to provide engineered systems that dramatically simplify how our customers can deploy, manage and lifecycle-manage throughout day-two operations, an entire cloud environment, and whether they're using Red Hat, whether they're using Wind River or VMware or other virtualization layers, they can deploy the right virtualization layer at the right part of their network to support the applications they're looking to drive, and Dell is looking to solve how they simplify and manage all of that, both from a hardware as well as a management software perspective. So this is really what Dell's doing to, again, partner with the broader technology community to help make that telco cloud a reality. >> Aaron, let's stay here for a second. I'm interested in some of the use cases that you're going after with customers. You've got edge infrastructure, remote work, 5G. Where's security fit? What are the focus areas for Dell, and can we double-click on that a little bit? >> Yeah, I mean, I think there's two main areas of telecommunication industry that we're talking to. One, we've really been talking about sort of the network buyer, how do they modernize the core, the network edge, the RAN capabilities, to deliver traditional telecommunication services and modernize that as they move into 5G and beyond. I think the other side of the business is telecoms are really looking, from a line of business perspective, to figure out how do they monetize that network and be able to deliver value-added services to their enterprise customers on top of these new networks. So you were just touching on a couple of things that are really critical. You know, in the enterprise space, AI and IoT is driving a tremendous amount of innovation out there, and there's a need for being able to support and manage edge compute at scale, be able to provide connectivity, like private mobility and 4G and 5G, being able to support things like mobile workforces and client capabilities to be able to access these devices that are around all of these edge environments of the enterprises, and telecoms are seen as that, as an opportunity for them to not only provide connectivity, but how do they extend their cloud out into these enterprise environments with compute, with connectivity, with client and connectivity resources, and even also provide protection for those environments as well. So these are areas that Dell's historically very strong at, being able to provide compute, being able to provide connectivity and being able to provide data protection and client services. We are looking to work closely with lines of businesses to be able to develop solutions that they can bring to market in combination with us to be able to serve their end user customers and their enterprises. So those are really the two key areas, not only network buyer, but being able to enable the lines of business to go and capitalize on the services they're developing for their customers. >> I think that line of business aspect is key. I mean, the telcos have had to sit back and provide the plumbing. Cost per bit goes down. Data consumption going through the roof. All the way over to the top guys, you know, had the field day with the data and the customer relationships, and now it's almost like the revenge of the telcos. (chuckles) Dennis, I wonder if we could talk about the future. What can we expect in the years ahead from Dell, if you, you know, break out the binoculars a little bit? >> Yeah, I think you hit it earlier. We've seen the movie before. This has happened in the IT data center. We went from proprietary vertical solutions to horizontal open systems. We went from client server to software-defined, open-hardware, cloud-native and you know, the trend is likely to be exactly that, in the telecom industry, because that's what the operators want. They're not naive to what's happened in the IT data center. They all run very large data centers, and they're trying to get some of the scale economies, some of the agility, the cost of ownership benefits for the reasons Aaron just discussed. You know, it's clear, as you point out, this industry's been really defined by the inability to stop investing and the difficulty to monetize that investment, and I think now everybody's looking at this 5G, and, frankly, 5G plus, 6G and beyond, as the opportunity to really go get a chunk of that revenue, and enterprise edge is the target. >> And 5G is touching so many industries, and that kind of brings me here into Mobile World Congress. I mean, you look at the floor layout, it's amazing. You got industry 4.0. You've got, you know, our traditional industry and telco colliding. There's public policy. So give us a teaser to Mobile World Congress '23. What's on deck at the show for from Dell? >> Yeah, we're really excited about Mobile World Congress. This, as you know, is a massive event for the industry every year, and it's really the event that the whole industry uses to kick off this coming year. So we're going to be using this, obviously, to talk to our customers and our partners about what Dell's looking to do and what we're innovating on right now, and what we're looking to partner with them around. In the front of the house, we're going to be highlighting 13 different solutions and demonstrations to be able to show our customers what we're doing today and show them the use cases and put it into action, so they get to actually look and feel and touch and experience what it is that we're working around. Obviously, meetings are important. Everybody knows Mobile World Congress is the place to get those meetings and kick off for the year. You know, we're looking at several hundred meetings, hundreds of meetings that we're going to be looking to have across the industry with our customers and partners and the broader community, and, of course, we've also got technology that's going to be in a variety of different partner spaces as well. So you can come and see us in hall three, but we're also going to have technologies kind of spread all over the floor, and, of course, there's always theCUBE. You're going to be able to see us live all four days, all day, every day. You're going to be hearing our executives, our partners, our customers, talk about, you know, what Dell is doing to innovate in the industry and how we're looking to leverage the broader open ecosystem to be able to transform, you know, the network and what we're looking to do. So in that space, we're going to be focusing on what we're doing from an ecosystem perspective, our infrastructure focus. We'll be talking about what we're doing to support telco cloud transformation and then finally, as we talked about earlier, how are we helping the lines of business within our telecoms monetize the opportunity. So these are all different things we're really excited to be focusing on and look forward to the event next month. >> Yeah, it's going to be awesome In Barcelona at the Fira. As you say, Dell's big presence in Hall three. Orange is in there, Deutsche Telekom. Intel's in Hall three. VMware's there, Nokia, Vodafone. You got great things to see there. Check that out and of course, theCUBE, we are super excited to be collaborating with you. We got a great setup. We're in the walkway, right between halls four and five, right across from the Government of Catalonia, who are the host partners for the event. So there's going to be a ton of action there. Guys, can't wait to see you there. Really appreciate your time today. >> Great, thanks. >> All right, Mobile World Congress, theCUBE's coverage starts on February 27th, right after the keynotes. So first thing in the morning, East coast time, we'll be broadcasting, as Aaron said, all week, Monday through Thursday, on the show floor. Check that out at thecube.net. Siliconangle.com has all the written coverage, and go to dell.com, see what's happening there. Have all the action from the event. Don't miss us. This is Dave Vellante. We'll see you there. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and one of the most important dimensions and to monetize new and all of the components It's the largest event for telecoms. the network to be able to and I love now the fact that of solutions that move the of some of the key partners and all of the layers about the need to and so one of the hot topics I'm interested in some of the use cases the lines of business to go and capitalize and now it's almost like the revenge as the opportunity to really What's on deck at the show for from Dell? and partners and the broader community, So there's going to be and go to dell.com, see
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Aaron | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aaron Chaisson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dennis Hoffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Vodafone | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
February 27th | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Orange | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thecube.net | OTHER | 0.99+ |
Thursday | DATE | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Nokia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mobile World Congress | EVENT | 0.99+ |
13 different solutions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Telcos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
next month | DATE | 0.99+ |
two key areas | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.98+ |
first round | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Deutsche Telekom | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Government of Catalonia | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Mobile Word Congress | EVENT | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
MWC 23 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Mobile World Congress 2023 | EVENT | 0.97+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
two main areas | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
both partners | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
twin thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Red Hat | TITLE | 0.93+ |
One layer | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
telco | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Fira | LOCATION | 0.91+ |
a trillion-dollar | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
hundred meetings | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Mobile World Congress '23 | EVENT | 0.83+ |
two main thrusts | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.8+ |
Keynote Analysis with Stu Miniman, Red Hat | KubeCon + CloudNative Con NA 2021
>>Hello everyone Welcome to the cubes coverage of cubic on cloud native come here in person in L A 2021. I'm john ferrier, host of the Cuban Dave Nicholson host cloud host for the cube and of course former host of the cube steve minutemen. Now at red hat stew, we do our normal keynote reviews. We had to have you come back first while hazard and red hat >>john it's phenomenal. Great to see you nice to have Dave be on the program here too. It's been awesome. So yeah, a year and a day since I joined Red hat and uh, I do miss you guys always enjoyed doing the interviews in the cube. But you know, we're still in the community and still interacting lots, >>but we love you too. And Davis, your new replacement and covering the cloud angles. He's gonna bring little stew mo jokes of the interview but still, we've always done the wrap up has always been our favorite interviews to do an analysis of the keynote because let's face it, that's where all the action is. Of course we bring the commentary, but this year it's important because it's the first time we've had an event in two years too. So a lot of people, you know, aren't saying this on camera a lot, but they're kind of nervous. They're worried they're weirded out. We're back in person again. What do I feel? I haven't seen people, I've been working with people online. This is the top story. >>Yeah, john I thought they did a really good job in the keynote this morning. Normally, I mean this community in general is good with inclusion. Part of that inclusion is hey, what are you comfortable with if your remote? We still love you and it's okay. And if you're here in person, you might see there's wrist bands of green, yellow, red as in like, hey, you okay with a handshake. You want to do there or stay the f away from me because I'm not really that comfortable yet being here and it's whatever you're comfortable with. That's okay. >>I think the inclusion and the whole respect for the individual code of conduct, C N C. F and limits Foundation has been on the front end of all those trends. I love how they're taking it to a whole nother level. David, I want to get your take because now with multi cloud, we heard the same message over and over again that hey, open winds, okay. Open winds and still changing fast. What's your take? >>Open absolutely wins. It's uh, it's the present. It's the future. I know in some of the conversations we've had with folks looking back over the last seven years, a lot of things have changed. Um, whenever I think of open source anything, I go back to the foundations of Lennox and I remember a time when you had to reboot a Linux server to re scan a scuzzy bus to add a new storage device and we all sort of put our penguin hats on and kind of ignored that for a while. And uh, and, and as things are developed, we keep coming into these new situations. Multi cluster management was a big, big point of conversation in the keynote today. It's fascinating when you start thinking about something that was once sort of a back room science experiment. Absolutely. It's the center of the enterprise now from a software >>from an open tour standpoint security has been one of those front and center things. One of the day, zero events that got a lot of buzz coming at the beginning of the week was secure supply chain. So with the Solar Wind act going in there, you know, we remember cloud, wait, can I trust it with the security? Open source right now. Open source and security go together. Open source and the security in the cloud all go together. So you know that that wave of open source, obviously one of the things that brought me to red hat, I'd had a couple of decades, you know, working within the enterprise and open source and that that adoption curve which went through a few bumps in the road over time and it took time. But today, I mean open sources have given this show in this ecosystem are such proof >>points of a couple things. I noticed one, I want to do a shout out for the folks who put a nice tribute for dan Kaminsky who has passed away and we miss him. We saw on the Cube 2019, I believe he's on the Cube that year with Adam on big influence, but the inclusiveness do and the community is changing. I think security has changed a lot and I want to get your guys take on this. Security has forced a lot of things happen faster data, open data. Okay. And kubernetes to get hardened faster stew. I know your team's working on it. We know what Azure and amazon is working on it. What do you guys think about how security's been forcing the advances in kubernetes and making that stable? >>Yeah. So john security, you know, is job one, it is everyone's responsibility. We talk about it from a container and kubernetes standpoint. We think we have a relatively good handle on what's happening in the kubernetes space red hat, we made an acquisition earlier this year of stack rocks, which was one of the leading kubernetes native security pieces. But you know, john we know security isn't just a moat anymore in a wall that you put up every single piece. You need to think about it. Um, I've got a person from the stack rocks acquisition actually on my team now and have told him like hey, you need to cross train all of us. We need to understand this more from a marketing standpoint, we need to talk about it from a developer standpoint. We need to have consideration of it. It's no longer, hey, it works okay on my machine. Come on, It needs to go to production. We all know this shift left is something we've been talking about for many years. So yes, security, security, security, we cannot overemphasize how important is um, you know, when it comes to cooper, I think, you know, were relatively mature, we're crossing the chasm, the adoption numbers are there, so it's not an impediment anymore. >>It's totally next level. I don't agree with this too. David, get your thoughts on this whole adoption um, roadmap that put it together, one of the working groups that we interviewed has got that kind of navigate, kinda like trailheads for salesforce, but that speaks to the adoption by mainstream enterprises, not the hard core, >>you know, >>us devops guys, but like it goes into mainstream main main street enterprise had I. T. Department and security groups there, like we got a program faster. How do you see the cloud guys in this ecosystem competing and making that go faster. >>So it's been interesting over the last decade or more often, technology has been ahead of people's comfort level with that technology for obvious reasons, it's not just something went wrong, it's something went wrong. I lost my job. Really, really bad things happened. So we tend to be conservative. Rightfully so in the sometimes there are these seminal moments where a shift happens go back sort of analogous go back to a time when people's main concern with VM ware was how can I get support from Microsoft and all of a sudden it went from that within weeks to how can I deploy this in my enterprise very, very quickly. And I'm fascinated by this concept of locking down the supply chain of code, uh sort of analogous to https, secure, http. It's the idea of making sure that these blocks of code are validated and secure as they get implemented. You mentioned, you mentioned things like cluster and pad's security and infrastructure security. >>Well, David, you brought up a really good point. So get off is the instance creation of that. How can I have my infrastructure as code? How can I make sure that I don't have drift? It's because I could just, it'll live and get hub and therefore it's version controlled. If I try to do something, it will validate that it's there and keep me on version because we know john we talked about it for years on the cube, we've gone beyond human scale if I don't build automation into it, if I don't have the guard rails in place because humans will mess things up so we need to make sure that we have the processes and the automation in place and kubernetes was built for that automation at its core, putting in, we've seen get up the Argosy, D was only went graduated, you know, the one dato was supported as coupon europe. Earlier this year, we already had a number of our customers deploying it using it. Talking publicly >>about it too. I want to get the kid apps angle and that's a good call out there and, and mainly because when we were on the cute, when you work, you post with with us, we were always cheerleading for Cuban. It we love because we've been here every single coupon. We were one saying this is gonna be big trust us and it is, it happens to so, but now we've been kind of, we don't have to sell it anymore. We don't, I mean not that we're selling it, but like we don't have to be a proponent of something we knew was going to happen, it happened. You're now work for a vendor red hat you talk to customers. What is that next level conversation look like now that they know it's real, they have to do it. How is the tops and then modern applications development, changing. What are your observations? Can you share with us from a redhead perspective as someone who's talking to customers, you know, what does real look like? >>Yeah. So get off is a great example of that. So, you know, certain of our government agencies that we work with, you know, obviously very secured about, you know, we want zero trust who do we put in charge of things. So if they can have, you know that that source of truth and know that that is maintained and lockdown and not await some admin is gonna mess something up on us either maliciously or oops, by accident or anything in between. That's why they were pushing that adoption of that kind of technology. So absolutely they, for the most part john they don't want to have to think about the infrastructure piece anymore. What if developers want the old past days was I want to be able to, you know, write once deploy anywhere, live anywhere, containers helps that a little bit. We even have in the container space. Now you can, you can use a service deployment model with Okay. Natives, the big open source project that, you know, VM ware ourselves are working on google's involved in it. So, you know, having us be able to focus on the business and not, you know, running the plumbing anymore. >>That's exactly, that's exactly, that's what we're so psyched for. Okay guys, let's wrap this up and and review the keynote day will start with you. What do you think of the keynote? What were the highlights? What do you take away from the taste keynote? >>So you touched on a couple of things, uh inclusion from all sorts of different angles. Really impressive. This sort of easing back into the world of being face to face. I think they're doing a fantastic job at that. The thing that struck me was something I mentioned earlier. Um moving into multi cluster management in a way that really speaks to enterprise deployments and the complexity of enterprise deployments moving forward? It's not just, it's not just, I'm a developer, I'm using resources in the cloud. I'm doing things this way, the rest of the enterprises doing it a legacy way. It's really an acknowledgement that these things are coming together increasingly. That's what really struck me >>to do. What's your takeaway from the end? >>So there's been a discussion in the industry, you know, what do the next million cloud customers look like we've crossed the chasm on kubernetes. One of the things they announced the keynote is they have a new associate level certification because I tell you before the keynote, I stopped by the breakfast area, saturday table, talk to a couple people. One guy was like, hey, I'm been on amazon for a bunch of years, but I'm a kubernetes newbie, I'm here to learn about that. It's not the same person that five years ago was like, I'm gonna grab all these projects and pull them down from getting, build my stack and you know, have a platform team to manage it from a red hat standpoint, we're delivering our biggest growth areas in cloud services where hey, I've got an SRE team, they can manage all that because can you do it? Sure you got people maybe you'll hire him, but wouldn't you rather have them work on, you know, that security initiative or that new application or some of these pieces, you know, what can you shift to your vendor? What can you offload from your team because we know the only constant is that things are gonna there's gonna be gonna be new pieces and I don't want to have to look at, oh there's another 20 new projects and how does that fit? Can I have a partner or consultant in sc that can help me integrate that into my environment when it makes sense for me because otherwise, oh my God, cloud, So much innovation. How do I grasp what I want? >>Great stuff guys, I would just say my summary is that okay? I'm excited this community has broken through the pandemic and survived and thrived people were working together during the pandemic. It's like a V. I. P. Event here. So that my keynote epiphany was this is like the who's who some big players are here. I saw Bill Vaz from amazon on the on the ground floor on monday night, He's number two at a W. S. I saw some top Vcs here. Microsoft IBM red hat the whole way tracks back. Whole track is back and it's a hybrid event. So I think we're here for the long haul with hybrid events where you can see a lot more in person, V. I. P. Like vibe people are doing deals. It feels alive too and it's all open. So it's all cool. And again, the team at C. N. C. F. They do an exceptional job of inclusion and making people feel safe and cool. So, great job. Thanks for coming on. I appreciate it. Good stuff. Okay. The keynote review from the cube Stupid Man shot for Dave Nicholson. Thanks for watching >>mm mm mm.
SUMMARY :
We had to have you come back first while hazard and red hat I do miss you guys always enjoyed doing the interviews in the cube. So a lot of people, you know, aren't saying this on camera a lot, but they're kind of nervous. Part of that inclusion is hey, what are you comfortable with C N C. F and limits Foundation has been on the front end of all those trends. I go back to the foundations of Lennox and I remember a time when you had to reboot a Linux server So with the Solar Wind act going in there, you know, we remember cloud, wait, What do you guys think about how security's But you know, john we know security isn't just a moat anymore in a wall that you put up every not the hard core, How do you see the cloud It's the idea of making sure that these blocks of code are you know, the one dato was supported as coupon europe. you know, what does real look like? Natives, the big open source project that, you know, VM ware ourselves are working on google's What do you take away from the taste keynote? So you touched on a couple of things, uh inclusion from all sorts of different angles. to do. So there's been a discussion in the industry, you know, what do the next million cloud customers look So I think we're here for the long haul with hybrid events where you can see a lot more
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Nicholson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
john ferrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bill Vaz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Davis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 new projects | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
john | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
dan Kaminsky | PERSON | 0.99+ |
monday night | DATE | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.98+ |
One guy | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.98+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
zero events | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Lennox | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Earlier this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
Cuban | OTHER | 0.97+ |
steve | PERSON | 0.96+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.96+ |
V. I. P. | EVENT | 0.96+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ | |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
saturday | DATE | 0.95+ |
L A 2021 | LOCATION | 0.94+ |
a year and a day | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
I. T. Department | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.93+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
C. N. C. F. | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
earlier this year | DATE | 0.92+ |
Azure | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
stew | PERSON | 0.9+ |
zero trust | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
limits Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
last seven years | DATE | 0.88+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
couple people | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
single coupon | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
million | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
CloudNative Con NA 2021 | EVENT | 0.82+ |
cooper | PERSON | 0.82+ |
Solar Wind | EVENT | 0.76+ |
Stupid Man | PERSON | 0.75+ |
W. S. | LOCATION | 0.73+ |
last decade | DATE | 0.72+ |
C N C. F | ORGANIZATION | 0.71+ |
Argosy | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
Cube 2019 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.7+ |
every single piece | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
year | DATE | 0.66+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
D | PERSON | 0.65+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
stack rocks | ORGANIZATION | 0.59+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.58+ |
red | ORGANIZATION | 0.58+ |
europe | ORGANIZATION | 0.57+ |
coupon | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
Red hat | TITLE | 0.53+ |
keynote | EVENT | 0.53+ |
hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.46+ |
Cuban | LOCATION | 0.34+ |
rocks | ORGANIZATION | 0.31+ |
MANUFACTURING Drive Transportation
(upbeat music) >> Welcome to our industry drill-down. This is from manufacturing. I'm here with Michael Ger who is the managing director for automotive and manufacturing solutions at Cloudera, and in this first session, we're going to discuss how to drive transportation efficiencies and improve sustainability with data. Connected trucks are fundamental to optimizing fleet performance, costs, and delivering new services to fleet operators, and what's going to happen here is Michael's going to present some data and information, and we're going to come back and have a little conversation about what we just heard. Michael, great to see you. Over to you. >> Oh, thank you, Dave, and I appreciate having this conversation today. Hey, this is actually an area, connected trucks. This is an area that we have seen a lot of action here at Cloudera, and I think the reason is kind of important because first of all, you can see that this change is happening very, very quickly. 150% growth is forecast by 2022, and I think this is why we're seeing a lot of action and a lot of growth is that there are a lot of benefits. We're talking about a B2B type of situation here. So this is truck makers providing benefits to fleet operators, and if you look at the top benefits that fleet operators expect, you see this in the graph over here. Almost 80% of them expect improved productivity, things like improved routing, so route efficiencies and improved customer service, decrease in fuel consumption, but better be, this isn't technology for technology's sake. These connected trucks are coming onto the marketplace because hey, they can provide tremendous value to the business, and in this case, we're talking about fleet operators and fleet efficiencies. So, one of the things that's really important to be able to enable this, trucks are becoming connected because at the end of the day, we want to be able to provide fleet efficiencies through connected truck analytics and machine learning. Let me explain to you a little bit about what we mean by that because how this happens is by creating a connected vehicle analytics machine learning lifecycle, and to do that, you need to do a few different things. You start off, of course, with connected trucks in the field, and you could have many of these trucks 'cause typically, you're dealing at a truck level and at a fleet level. We want to be able to do analytics and machine learning to improve performance. So you start off with these trucks, and the first you need to be able to do is connect to those trucks. You have to have an intelligent edge where you can collect that information from the trucks, and by the way, once you've conducted this information from the trucks, you want to be able to analyze that data in real-time and take real-time actions. Now, what I'm going to show you, the ability to take this real-time action is actually the result of a machine learning life cycle. Let me explain to you what I mean by that. So we have this truck, so we start to collect data from it. At the end of the day, what we'd like to be able to do is pull that data into either your data center or into the cloud where we can start to do more advanced analytics, and we start with being able to ingest that data into the cloud, into the enterprise data lake. We store that data. We want to enrich it with other data sources, so for example, if you're doing truck predictive maintenance, you want to take that sensor data that you've collected from those trucks, and you want to augment that with your dealership service information. Now, you have sensor data and the resulting repair orders. You're now equipped to do things like predict when maintenance will occur. You've got all the data sets that you need to be able to do that. So what do you do here? Like I said, you ingest it, you're storing it, you're enriching it with data. You're processing that data. You're aligning, say, the sensor data to that transactional system data from your repair maintenance systems. You're bringing it together so that you can do two things. First of all, you could do self-service BI on that data. You can do things like fleet analytics, but more importantly, what I was talking to you about before is you now have the data sets to be able to create machine learning models. So if you have the sensor values and the need, for example, for a dealership repair order so you could start to correlate which sensor values predicted the need for maintenance, and you could build out those machine learning models, and then, as I mentioned to you, you could push those machine learning models back out to the edge which is how you would then take those real-time actions I mentioned earlier. As that data that then comes through in real-time, you're running it against that model, and you can take some real-time actions. This analytics and machine learning model, machine learning life cycle, is exactly what Cloudera enables. This end-to-end ability to ingest data, store it, put a query lay over it, create machine learning models, and then run those machine learning models in real-time. Now, that's what we do as a business. Now, one such customer, and I just wanted to give you one example of a customer that we have worked with to provide these types of results is Navistar, and Navistar was kind of an early adopter of connected-truck analytics, and they provided these capabilities to their fleet operators. And they started off by connecting 475,000 trucks, up to well over a million now, and the point here is that they were centralizing data from their telematics service providers, from their trucks' telematics service providers. They're bringing in things like weather data and all those types of things, and what they started to do was to build out machine learning models aimed at predictive maintenance, and what's really interesting is that you see that Navistar made tremendous strides in reducing the expense associated with maintenance. So rather than waiting for a truck to break, and then fixing it, they would predict when that truck needs service, condition-based monitoring, and service it before it broke down so that you can do that in a much more cost-effective manner. And if you see the benefits, they reduced maintenance costs 3 cents a mile down from the industry average of 15 cents a mile down to 12 cents cents a mile. So this was a tremendous success for Navistar, and we're seeing this across many of our truck manufacturers. We're working with many of the truck OEMs, and they are all working to achieve very, very similar types of benefits to their customers. So just a little bit about Navistar. Now, we're going to turn to Q&A. Dave's got some questions for me in a second, but before we do that, if you want to learn more about how we work with connected vehicles and autonomous vehicles, please go to our website, what you see up on the screen. There's the URLs, cloudera.com/solutions/manufacturing, and you'll see a whole slew of lateral and information in much more detail in terms of how we connect trucks to fleet operators who provide analytics, use cases that drive dramatically improved performance. So with that being said, I'm going to turn it over to Dave for questions. >> Thank you, Michael. That's a great example. I love the lifecycle. We can visualize that very well. You've got an edge-use case. You're doing both real time inference, really, at the edge, and then you're blending that sensor data with other data sources to enrich your models, and you can push that back to the edge. That's that life cycle, so really appreciate that info. Let me ask you, what are you seeing as the most common connected vehicle when you think about analytics and machine learning, the use cases that you see customers really leaning into? >> Yeah, that's a great question, Dave 'cause everybody always thinks about machine learning, like this is the first thing you go to. Well, actually it's not. The first thing you really want to be able to do, and many of our customers are doing, is look, let's simply connect our trucks or our vehicles or whatever our IOT asset is, and then you can do very simple things like just performance monitoring of the piece of equipment. In the truck industry, a lot of performance monitoring of the truck, but also performance monitoring of the driver. So how is the driver performing? Is there a lot of idle time spent? What's route efficiencies looking like? By connecting the vehicles, you get insights, as I said, into the truck and into the driver, and that's not machine learning any more, but that monitoring piece is really, really important. So the first thing that we see is monitoring types of use cases. Then you start to see companies move towards more of the, what I call, the machine learning and AI models where you're using inference on the edge, and there you start to see things like predictive maintenance happening, kind of real-time route optimization and things like that, and you start to see that evolution again to those smarter, more intelligent, dynamic types of decision-making. But let's not minimize the value of good old-fashioned monitoring to give you that kind of visibility first, then moving to smarter use cases as you go forward. >> You know, it's interesting. I'm envisioning, when you talked about the monitoring, I'm envisioning you see the bumper sticker how am I driving? The only time somebody ever probably calls is when they get cut off, and many people might think, oh, it's about Big Brother, but it's not. I mean, that's yeah, okay, fine, but it's really about improvement and training and continuous improvement, and then of course the route optimization. I mean, that's bottom-line business value. I love those examples. >> Great. >> What are the big hurdles that people should think about when they want to jump into those use cases that you just talked about? What are they going to run into, the blind spots they're going to get hit with? >> There's a few different things. So first of all, a lot of times, your IT folks aren't familiar with kind of the more operational IOT types of data. So just connecting to that type of data can be a new skill set. There's very specialized hardware in the car and things like that and protocols. That's number one. That's the classic IT-OT kind of conundrum that many of our customers struggle with, but then more fundamentally is if you look at the way these types of connected truck or IOT solutions started, oftentimes the first generation were very custom built, so they were brittle. They were kind of hardwired. Then as you move towards more commercial solutions, you had what I call the silo problem. You had fragmentation in terms of this capability from this vendor, this capability from another vendor. You get the idea. One of the things that we really think that needs to be brought to the table is first of all, having an end-to-end data management platform that's kind of integrated, it's all tested together. You have a data lineage across the entire stack, but then also importantly, to be realistic, you have to be able to integrate to industry kind of best practices as well in terms of solution components in the car, the hardware, and all those types of things. So I think there's, it's just stepping back for a second, I think that there has been fragmentation and complexity in the past. We're moving towards more standards and more standard types of offerings. Our job as a software maker is to make that easier and connect those dots so customers don't have to do it all and all on their own. >> And you mentioned specialized hardware. One of the things we heard earlier in the main stage was your partnership with Nvidia. We're talking about new types of hardware coming in. You guys are optimizing for that. We see the IT and the OT worlds blending together, no question, and then that end-to-end management piece. This is different from, you're right, from IT. Normally everything's controlled, you're the data center, and this is a metadata rethinking, kind of how you manage metadata. So in the spirit of what we talked about earlier today, other technology partners, are you working with other partners to sort of accelerate these solutions, move them forward faster? >> Yeah, I'm really glad you're asking that Dave because we actually embarked on a project called Project Fusion which really was about integrating with, when you look at that connected vehicle lifecycle, there are some core vendors out there that are providing some very important capabilities. So what we did is we joined forces with them to build an end-to-end demonstration and reference architecture to enable the complete data management life cycle. Now, Cloudera's piece of this was ingesting data and all the things I talked about being storing and the machine learning. So we provide that end-to-end, but what we wanted to do is we wanted to partner with some key partners, and the partners that we did integrate with were NXP. NXP provides the service-oriented gateways in the cars. That's the hardware in the car. Wind River provides an in-car operating system that's Linux, that's hardened and tested. We then ran our Apache MiNiFi which is part of Cloudera Dataflow in the vehicle, on that operating system, on that hardware. We pumped the data over into the cloud where we did all the data analytics and machine learning and built out these very specialized models, and then we used a company called Airbiquity once we built those models to do. They specialize in automotive over-the-air updates, so they can then take those models and update those models back to the vehicle very rapidly. So what we said is, look, there's an established ecosystem, if you will, of leaders in this space. What we wanted to do is make sure that Cloudera was part and parcel of this ecosystem, and by the way, you mentioned Nvidia as well. We're working close with Nvidia now so when we're doing the machine learning, we can leverage some of their hardware to get some still further acceleration in the machine learning side of things. So yeah, one of the things I always say about these types of use cases, it does take a village, and what we've really tried to do is build out an ecosystem that provides that village so that we can speed that analytics and machine learning life cycle just as fast as it can be. >> This is, again, another great example of data-intensive workloads. It's not your grandfather's ERP that's running on traditional systems. These are really purpose built. Maybe they're customizable for certain edge-use cases. They're low cost, low power. They can't be bloated, and you're right, it does take an ecosystem. You've got to have APIs that connect, and that takes a lot of work and a lot of thought. So that leads me to the technologies that are sort of underpinning this. We talked a lot on theCUBE about semiconductor technology, and now that's changing, and the advancements we're seeing there. What do you see as some of the key technology areas that are advancing this connected vehicle machine learning? >> You know, it's interesting. I'm seeing it in a few places, just a few notable ones. I think, first of all, we see that the vehicle itself is getting smarter. So when you look at that NXP-type of gateway that we talked about, that used to be kind of a dumb gateway that was really, all it was doing was pushing data up and down and provided isolation as a gateway down from the lower level subsystems, so it was really security and just basic communication. That gateway now is becoming what they call a service oriented gateway, so it can run. It's got discs, it's got memory, it's got all this stuff. So now you could run serious compute in the car. So now, all of these things like running machine learning inference models, you have a lot more power in the car. At the same time, 5G is making it so that you can push data fast enough making low-latency computing available even on the cloud. So now you've got incredible compute both at the edge in the vehicle and on the cloud. And then on the cloud, you've got partners like Nvidia who are accelerating it still further through better GPU-based compute. So I mean the whole stack, if you look at that machine learning life cycle we talked about, no Dave, it seems like there's improvements in every step along the way. We're starting to see technology optimization just pervasive throughout the cycle. >> And then, real quick. It's not a quick topic, but you mentioned security. I mean, we've seen a whole new security model emerge. There is no perimeter anymore in a use case like this, is there? >> No, there isn't, and one of the things that we're- Remember, we're the data management platform, and the thing we have to provide is provide end-to-end lineage of where that data came from, who can see it, how it changed, and that's something that we have integrated into from the beginning of when that data is ingested through when it's stored through when it's kind of processed, and people are doing machine learning. We will provide that lineage so that security and governance is assured throughout the data learning life cycle. >> And federated, in this example, across the fleet. So, all right, Michael, that's all the time we have right now. Thank you so much for that great information. Really appreciate it. >> Dave, thank you, and thanks for the audience for listening in today. >> Yes, thank you for watching. Keep it right there. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
and in this first session, and the first you need to be able to do and machine learning, the and then you can do very talked about the monitoring, and complexity in the past. So in the spirit of what we and the partners that we and the advancements we're seeing there. it so that you can push data but you mentioned security. and the thing we have that's all the time we have right now. and thanks for the audience Yes, thank you for watching.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nvidia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Ger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Airbiquity | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cloudera | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Navistar | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NXP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
475,000 trucks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
150% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.99+ |
first generation | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3 cents a mile | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 cents a mile | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first session | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
cloudera.com/solutions/manufacturing | OTHER | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
one such | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
12 cents cents a mile | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Apache | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
over a million | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
80% | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
earlier today | DATE | 0.72+ |
Brother | TITLE | 0.6+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
MiNiFi | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.58+ |
well | QUANTITY | 0.55+ |
Manufacturing - Drive Transportation Efficiency and Sustainability with Big | Cloudera
>> Welcome to our industry drill down. This is for manufacturing. I'm here with Michael Ger, who is the managing director for automotive and manufacturing solutions at Cloudera. And in this first session, we're going to discuss how to drive transportation efficiencies and improve sustainability with data. Connected trucks are fundamental to optimizing fleet performance, costs, and delivering new services to fleet operators. And what's going to happen here is Michael's going to present some data and information, and we're going to come back and have a little conversation about what we just heard. Michael, great to see you! Over to you. >> Oh, thank you, Dave. And I appreciate having this conversation today. Hey, you know, this is actually an area, connected trucks, you know, this is an area that we have seen a lot of action here at Cloudera. And I think the reason is kind of important, right? Because you know, first of all, you can see that, you know, this change is happening very, very quickly, right? 150% growth is forecast by 2022 and the reasons, and I think this is why we're seeing a lot of action and a lot of growth, is that there are a lot of benefits, right? We're talking about a B2B type of situation here. So this is truck made, truck makers providing benefits to fleet operators. And if you look at the, the top fleet operator, the top benefits that fleet operators expect, you see this in, in the, in the graph over here, now almost 80% of them expect improved productivity, things like improved routing, right? So route efficiencies, improved customer service, decrease in fuel consumption, better better technology. This isn't technology for technology's sake, these connected trucks are coming onto the marketplace because, hey, it can provide tremendous value to the business. And in this case, we're talking about fleet operators and fleet efficiencies. So, you know, one of the things that's really important to be able to enable us, right, trucks are becoming connected because at the end of the day, we want to be able to provide fleet efficiencies through connected truck analytics and machine learning. Let me explain to you a little bit about what we mean by that, because what, you know, how this happens is by creating a connected vehicle, analytics, machine-learning life cycle, and to do that, you need to do a few different things, right? You start off, of course, with connected trucks in the field. And, you know, you could have many of these trucks because typically you're dealing at a truck level and at a fleet level, right? You want to be able to do analytics and machine learning to improve performance. So you start off with these trucks. And the first thing you need to be able to do is connect to those trucks, right? You have to have an intelligent edge where you can collect that information from the trucks. And by the way, once you collect the, this information from the trucks, you want to be able to analyze that data in real-time and take real-time actions. Now what I'm going to show you, the ability to take this real-time action, is actually the result of your machine-learning lifecycle. Let me explain to you what I mean by that. So we have these trucks, we start to collect data from it, right? At the end of the day what we'd like to be able to do is pull that data into either your data center or into the cloud, where we can start to do more advanced analytics. And we start with being able to ingest that data into the cloud, into that enterprise data lake. We store that data. We want to enrich it with other data sources. So for example, if you're doing truck predictive maintenance, you want to take that sensor data that you've connected, collected from those trucks. And you want to augment that with your dealership, say, service information. Now you have, you know, you have sensor data and the resulting repair orders. You're now equipped to do things like predict when maintenance will work, all right. You've got all the data sets that you need to be able to do that. So what do you do? Like I said, you're ingested, you're storing, you're enriching it with data, right? You're processing that data. You're aligning, say, the sensor data to that transactional system data from your, from your your repair maintenance systems; you're, you're bringing it together so that you can do two things. You can do, first of all, you could do self-service BI on that data, right? You can do things like fleet analytics, but more importantly, what I was talking to you about before is you now have the data sets to be able to do create machine learning models. So if you have the sensor values and the need, for example, for, for a dealership repair, or is, you could start to correlate which sensor values predicted the need for maintenance, and you could build out those machine learning models. And then as I mentioned to you, you could push those machine learning models back out to the edge, which is how you would then take those real-time actions I mentioned earlier. As that data that then comes through in real-time, you're running it again against that model. And you can take some real-time actions. This is what we, this is this, this, this analytics and machine learning model, machine learning life cycle is exactly what Cloudera enables. This end-to-end ability to ingest data; store, you know, store it, put a query lay over it, create machine learning models, and then run those machine learning models in real time. Now that's what we, that's what we do as a business. Now one such customer, and I just want to give you one example of a customer that we have worked with to provide these types of results is Navistar. And Navistar was kind of an early, early adopter of connected truck analytics, and they provided these capabilities to their fleet operators, right? And they started off by, by, you know, connecting 475,000 trucks to up to well over a million now. And you know, the point here is that they were centralizing data from their telematics service providers, from their trucks' telematics service providers. They're bringing in things like weather data and all those types of things. And what they started to do was to build out machine learning models aimed at predictive maintenance. And what's really interesting is that you see that Navistar made tremendous strides in reducing the need, or the expense associated with maintenance, right? So rather than waiting for a truck to break and then fixing it, they would predict when that truck needs service, condition-based monitoring, and service it before it broke down, so that you can do that in a much more cost-effective manner. And if you see the benefits, right, they reduce maintenance costs 3 cents a mile from the, you know, down from the industry average of 15 cents a mile down to 12 cents cents a mile. So this was a tremendous success for Navistar. And we're seeing this across many of our, you know, truck manufacturers. We're, we're working with many of the truck OEMs, and they are all working to achieve very, very similar types of benefits to their customers. So just a little bit about Navistar. Now, we're going to turn to Q and A. Dave's got some questions for me in a second, but before we do that, if you want to learn more about our, how we work with connected vehicles and autonomous vehicles, please go to our web, to our website. What you see up, up on the screen. There's the URL. It's cloudera.com forward slash solutions, forward slash manufacturing. And you'll see a whole slew of collateral and information in much more detail in terms of how we connect trucks to fleet operators who provide analytics. Use cases that drive dramatically improved performance. So with that being said, I'm going to turn it over to Dave for questions. >> Thank you, Michael. That's a great example you've got. I love the life cycle. You can visualize that very well. You've got an edge use case you do in both real time inference, really, at the edge. And then you're blending that sensor data with other data sources to enrich your models. And you can push that back to the edge. That's that life cycle. So really appreciate that, that info. Let me ask you, what are you seeing as the most common connected vehicle when you think about analytics and machine learning, the use cases that you see customers really leaning into? >> Yeah, that's really, that's a great question, Dave, you know, cause, you know, everybody always thinks about machine learning like this is the first thing you go to. Well, actually it's not, right? For the first thing you really want to be able to go down, many of our customers are doing, is look, let's simply connect our trucks or our vehicles or whatever our IOT asset is, and then you can do very simple things like just performance monitoring of the, of the piece of equipment. In the truck industry, a lot of performance monitoring of the truck, but also performance monitoring of the driver. So how is the, how is the driver performing? Is there a lot of idle time spent? You know, what's, what's route efficiency looking like? You know, by connecting the vehicles, right? You get insights, as I said, into the truck and into the driver and that's not machine learning even, right? But, but that, that monitoring piece is really, really important. So the first thing that we see is monitoring types of use cases. Then you start to see companies move towards more of the, what I call the machine learning and AI models, where you're using inference on the edge. And then you start to see things like predictive maintenance happening, kind of route real-time, route optimization and things like that. And you start to see that evolution again, to those smarter, more intelligent dynamic types of decision-making. But let's not, let's not minimize the value of good old fashioned monitoring, that's to give you that kind of visibility first, then moving to smarter use cases as you, as you go forward. >> You know, it's interesting, I'm I'm envisioning, when you talked about the monitoring, I'm envisioning, you see the bumper sticker, you know, "How am I driving?" The only time somebody ever probably calls is when they get cut off it's and you know, I mean, people might think, "Oh, it's about big brother," but it's not. I mean, that's yeah okay, fine. But it's really about improvement and training and continuous improvement. And then of course the, the route optimization. I mean, that's, that's bottom line business value. So, so that's, I love those, those examples. >> Great! >> I wonder, I mean, what are the big hurdles that people should think about when they want to jump into those use cases that you just talked about, what are they going to run into? You know, the blind spots they're, they're going to, they're going to to get hit with. >> There's a few different things, right? So first of all, a lot of times your IT folks aren't familiar with the kind of the more operational IOT types of data. So just connecting to that type of data can be a new skill set, right? There's very specialized hardware in the car and things like, like that and protocols. That's number one. That's the classic IT OT kind of conundrum that, you know, many of our customers struggle with. But then, more fundamentally, is, you know, if you look at the way these types of connected truck or IOT solutions started, you know, oftentimes they were, the first generation were very custom built, right? So they were brittle, right? They were kind of hardwired. Then as you move towards more commercial solutions, you had what I call the silo problem, right? You had fragmentation in terms of this capability from this vendor, this capability from another vendor. You get the idea. You know, one of the things that we really think that we need that we, that needs to be brought to the table, is, first of all, having an end to end data management platform. It's kind of an integrated, it's all tested together, you have a data lineage across the entire stack. But then also importantly, to be realistic, we have to be able to integrate to industry kind of best practices as well in terms of solution components in the car, the hardware and all those types of things. So I think there's, you know, it's just stepping back for a second, I think that there is, has been fragmentation and complexity in the past. We're moving towards more standards and more standard types of offerings. Our job as a software maker is to make that easier and connect those dots, so customers don't have to do it all on all on their own. >> And you mentioned specialized hardware. One of the things we heard earlier in the main stage was your partnership with Nvidia. We're talking about new types of hardware coming in. You guys are optimizing for that. We see the IT and the OT worlds blending together, no question. And then that end-to-end management piece, you know, this is different from, your right, from IT, normally everything's controlled, you're in the data center. And this is a metadata, you know, rethinking kind of how you manage metadata. So in the spirit of, of what we talked about earlier today, other technology partners, are you working with other partners to sort of accelerate these solutions, move them forward faster? >> Yeah, I'm really glad you're asking that, Dave, because we actually embarked on a product on a project called Project Fusion, which really was about integrating with, you know, when you look at that connected vehicle lifecycle, there are some core vendors out there that are providing some very important capabilities. So what we did is we joined forces with them to build an end-to-end demonstration and reference architecture to enable the complete data management life cycle. Now Cloudera's piece of this was ingesting data and all the things I talked about in storing and the machine learning, right? And so we provide that end to end. But what we wanted to do is we wanted to partner with some key partners. And the partners that we did integrate with were NXP. NXP provides the service-oriented gateways in the car, so that's the hardware in the car. Wind River provides an in-car operating system. That's Linux, right? That's hardened and tested. We then ran ours, our, our Apache MiNiFi, which is part of Cloudera data flow, in the vehicle, right on that operating system, on that hardware. We pumped the data over into the cloud where we did the, all the data analytics and machine learning, and built out these very specialized models. And then we used a company called Airbiquity, once we built those models, to do, you know, they specialize in automotive over-the-air updates, right? So they can then take those models, and update those models back to the vehicle very rapidly. So what we said is, look, there's, there's an established, you know, ecosystem, if you will, of leaders in this space. What we wanted to do is make sure that Cloudera was part and parcel of this ecosystem. And by the way, you mentioned Nvidia as well. We're working close with Nvidia now. So when we're doing the machine learning, we can leverage some of their hardware to get some still further acceleration in the machine learning side of things. So yeah, you know, one of the things I, I, I always say about these types of use cases, it does take a village. And what we've really tried to do is build out that, that, that an ecosystem that provides that village so that we can speed that analytics and machine learning lifecycle just as fast as it can be. >> This is, again, another great example of data intensive workloads. It's not your, it's not your grandfather's ERP that's running on, you know, traditional, you know, systems, it's, these are really purpose built, maybe they're customizable for certain edge-use cases. They're low cost, low, low power. They can't be bloated. And you're right, it does take an ecosystem. You've got to have, you know, APIs that connect and, and that's that, that takes a lot of work and a lot of thought. So that, that leads me to the technologies that are sort of underpinning this. We've talked, we've talked a lot on The Cube about semiconductor technology, and now that's changing, and the advancements we're seeing there. What, what do you see as some of the key technology areas that are advancing this connected vehicle machine learning? >> You know, it's interesting, I'm seeing it in, in a few places, just a few notable ones. I think, first of all, you know, we see that the vehicle itself is getting smarter, right? So when you look at, we look at that NXP type of gateway that we talked about. That used to be kind of a, a dumb gateway that was, really all it was doing was pushing data up and down, and provided isolation as a gateway down to the, down from the lower level subsystems. So it was really security and just basic, you know, basic communication. That gateway now is becoming what they call a service oriented gateway. So it can run. It's not, it's got disc, it's got memory, it's got all this. So now you could run serious compute in the car, right? So now all of these things like running machine-learning inference models, you have a lot more power in the car. At the same time, 5G is making it so that you can push data fast enough, making low latency computing available, even on the cloud. So now, now you've got incredible compute both at the edge in the vehicle and on the cloud, right? And, you know, and then on the, you know, on the cloud, you've got partners like Nvidia, who are accelerating it still further through better GPU-based computing. So, I mean the whole stack, if you look at that, that machine learning life cycle we talked about, you know, Dave, it seems like there's improvements in every, in every step along the way, we're starting to see technology optim, optimization just pervasive throughout the cycle. >> And then, you know, real quick, it's not a quick topic, but you mentioned security. I mean, we've seen a whole new security model emerge. There is no perimeter anymore in this, in a use case like this is there? >> No, there isn't. And one of the things that we're, you know, remember we're the data management plat, platform, and the thing we have to provide is provide end-to-end, you know, end-to-end lineage of where that data came from, who can see it, you know, how it changed, right? And that's something that we have integrated into, from the beginning of when that data is ingested, through when it's stored, through when it's kind of processed and people are doing machine learning; we provide, we will provide that lineage so that, you know, that security and governance is assured throughout the, throughout that data learning life's level. >> And federated across, in this example, across the fleet, so. All right, Michael, that's all the time we have right now. Thank you so much for that great information. Really appreciate it. >> Dave, thank you. And thanks for the audience for listening in today. >> Yes, thank you for watching. Keep it right there.
SUMMARY :
And in this first session, And the first thing you the use cases that you see For the first thing you really it's and you know, I that you just talked about, So I think there's, you know, And this is a metadata, you know, And by the way, you You've got to have, you and just basic, you know, And then, you know, real that lineage so that, you know, the time we have right now. And thanks for the audience Yes, thank you for watching.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nvidia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Michael Ger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cloudera | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
12 cents | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
NXP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Airbiquity | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Navistar | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
150% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
475,000 trucks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
first session | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first generation | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
15 cents a mile | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Wind River | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.98+ |
cloudera.com | OTHER | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
3 cents a mile | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one example | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
almost 80% | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Apache | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
cents a mile | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
over a million | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
earlier today | DATE | 0.79+ |
Project | TITLE | 0.75+ |
one such customer | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.7+ |
a second | QUANTITY | 0.69+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.64+ |
well | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
MiNiFi | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.59+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.56+ |
up | QUANTITY | 0.54+ |
Cloudera | TITLE | 0.53+ |
Blake Scholl, Boom Supersonic | AWS re:Invent 2020
>>From around the globe. It's the cube with digital coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 sponsored by Intel and AWS. >>Welcome back to the cubes coverage of AWS reinvent 2020 live I'm Lisa Martin. Really exciting topic coming up for you next, please. Welcome Blake shoulda, founder and CEO of boom supersonic Blake. It's great to have you on the program. Thank you for having me, Lisa, and your background gives me all the way with what we're going to talk about in the next few minutes or so, but supersonic flight has existed for quite a long time, like 50 or so years. I think those of us in certain generations remember the Concorde for example, but the technology to make it efficient and mainstream is only recently been approved by or accepted by regulators. Tell us a little bit about boom, your mission to make the world more accessible with supersonic commercial flight. Well, a supersonic flight has >> actually been around since 1949 when Chuck Yeager broke the speed barrier or sorry, the sound barrier. >>And as, as many of you know, he actually passed yesterday, uh, 97. So very, very sad to see one of the supersonic pioneers behind us. Uh, but, uh, but as I say goodbye to Jaeger, a new era of supersonic flight is here. And if you look at the history of progress and transportation, since the Dawn of the industrial revolution, uh, we used to make regular progress and speed. As we went from, uh, the horse to the iron horse, to the, the boats, to the, the early propeller airplanes that have the jet age. And what happened was every time we made transportation faster, instead of spending less time traveling, we actually spent more time traveling because there were more places to go, more people to meet. Uh, we haven't had a world war since the Dawn of the jet age. Uh, places like Hawaii have become, uh, a major tourist destination. >>Uh, but today, uh, today it's been 60 years since we've had a mainstream re uh, step forward and speed. So what we're doing here at boom is picking up where Concord left off building an aircraft that flies faster by factor to the, anything you can get a ticket on today. And yet is 75% more affordable than Concorde was. So we want to make Australia as accessible as a why yesterday. We want to enable you to cross the Atlantic, do business, be home in time, detect your kids into bed, or take a three-day business trip to Asia and let you do it in just 24 >> hours. I like the sound of all of that. Even getting on a plane right now in general. I think we all do so, so interesting that you, you want to make this more accessible. And I did see the news about Chuck Yeager last night. >>Um, designing though the first supersonic airliner overture, it's called in decades, as you said, this dates back 60 years, rolling it out goal is to roll it out in 2025 and flying more than 500 trans oceanic routes. Talk to me about how you're leveraging technology and AWS to help facilitate that. Right. Well, so one of the really fascinating things is the new generation of airplanes, uh, are getting born in the cloud and then they're going to go fly through actual clouds. And so there are, there are a bunch of revolutions in technology that have happened since Concord's time that are enabling what we're doing now, their breakthroughs and materials. We've gone from aluminum to carbon fiber they're breakthroughs and engines. We've gone from after burning turbo jets that are loud and inefficient to quiet, clean, efficient turbo fans. But one of the most interesting breakthroughs has been in a available to do design digitally and iteration digitally versus, uh, versus physically. >>So when conquer was designed as an example, they were only able to do about a dozen wind tunnel tests because they were so expensive. And so time consuming and on, uh, on our XP one aircraft, which is our prototype that rolled out in October. Um, uh, we did hundreds of iterations of the design in virtual wind tunnels, where we could spin up a, uh, a simulation and HPC cluster in AWS, often more than 500 cores. And then we'd have our airplanes flying through virtual wind tunnels, thousands of flights scenarios you can figure out which were the losers, which were the winners keep iterating on the winners. And you arrive at an aerodynamic design that is more efficient at high speed. We're going very safely, very quickly in a straight line, but also a very smooth controllable for safe takeoff and landing. And the part of the artist supersonic airplane design is to accomplish both of those things. One, one airplane, and, uh, being able to design in the cloud, the cloud allows us to start up to do what previously only governments and militaries could do. I mentioned we rolled out our XP one prototype in October. That's the first time anyone has rolled out a supersonic civil aircraft since the Soviet union did it in 1968. And we're able to do as a startup because of computing. >>That's incredible born in the cloud to fly in the cloud. So talk to me about a lot of, of opportunity that technology has really accelerated. And we've seen a lot of acceleration this year in particular digital transformation businesses that if they haven't pivoted are probably in some challenging waters. So talk to us about how you're going all in with AWS to facilitate all these things that you just mentioned, which has dramatic change over 12, uh, when tone test for the Concord and how many times did it, >>Uh, I mean for 27 years, but not that many flights, never, it never changed the way mainstream, uh, never, never district some of you and I fly. Right. Um, so, so how, how are we going all in? So we've, you know, we've been using AWS for, uh, you know, basically since the founding of the company. Uh, but what we, what we're doing now is taking things that we were doing outside of the cloud and cloud. Uh, as an example, uh, we have 525 terabytes of XP one design and test data that what used to be backed up offsite. Um, and, and what we're doing is migrating into the cloud. And then your data is next. Your compute, you can start to do these really interesting things as an example, uh, you can run machine learning models to calibrate your simulations to your wind tunnel results, which accelerates convergence allows you to run more iterations even faster, and ultimately come up with a more efficient airplane, which means it's going to be more affordable for all of us to go to go break the sound barrier. >>And that sounds like kind of one of the biggest differences that you just said is that it wasn't built for mainstream before. Now, it's going to be accessibility affordability as well. So how are you going to be leveraging the cloud, you know, design manufacturing, but also other areas like the beyond onboard experience, which I'm already really excited to be participating in in the next few years. >>Yeah. So there's so many, so many examples. We've talked about design a little bit already. Uh, it's going to manifest in the manufacturing process, uh, where the, the, the, the, the supply chain, uh, will be totally digital. The factory operations will be run out of the cloud. You know, so what that means concretely is, uh, you know, literally there'll be like a million parts of this airplane. And for any given unit goes through their production line, you'll instantly know where they all are. Um, you'll know which serial numbers went on, which airplanes, uh, you'll understand, uh, if there was a problem with one of it, how you fixed it. And as you continue to iterate and refine the airplane, this, this is one of things that's actually a big deal, uh, with, with digital in the cloud is, you know, exactly what design iteration went into, exactly which airplane and, uh, and that allows you to actually iterate faster and any given airline with any given airplane will actually know exactly what, what airplane they have, but the next one that rolls off the line might be even a little bit better. >>And so it allows you to keep track of all of that. It allows you to iterate faster, uh, it allows you to spot bottlenecks in your supply chain before they impact production. Um, and then it allows you to, uh, to do preventive maintenance later. So there's to be digital interpretation all over the airplane, it's going to update the cloud on, you know, uh, are the engines running expected temperature. So I'm gonna run a little bit hot, is something vibrating more than it should vibrate. And so you catch these things way before there's any kind of real maintenance issue. You flag it in the cloud. The next time the airplane lands, there's a tech waiting for the airplane with whatever the part is and able to install it. And you don't have any downtime, and you're never anywhere close to a safety issue. You're able to do a lot more preventively versus what you can do today. >>Wow. So you have to say that you're going to be able to, to have a hundred percent visibility into manufacturing design, everything is kind of an understatement, but you launched XQ on your prototype in October. So during the pandemic, as I mentioned, we've been talking for months now on the virtual cube about the acceleration of digital transformation. Andy, Jassy talked about it in his keynote at AWS reinventing, reinventing this year, virtual, what were some of the, the, the advantages that you got, being able to stay on track and imagine if you were on track to launch in October during a time that has been so chaotic, uh, everywhere else, including air travel. >>Well, some of it's very analog, uh, and some of it's very digital. So to start with the analog, uh, we took COVID really seriously at Bo. Uh, we went into that, the pandemic first hit, we shut the company down for a couple of weeks, so we'd kind of get our feet underneath of us. And then we sort of testing, uh, everyone who had to work on the airplane every 14 days, we were religious about wearing masks. And as a result, we haven't had anyone catch COVID within the office. Um, and I'm super proud that we're able to stay productive and stay safe during the pandemic. Um, and you do that, but kind of taking it seriously, doing common sense things. And then there's the digital effort. And, uh, and so, you know, part of the company runs digitally. What we're able to do is when there's kind of a higher alert level, we go a little bit more digital when there's a lower alert level. >>Uh, we have more people in the office cause we, we still really do value that in-person collaboration and which brings it back through to a bigger point. It's been predicted for a long time, that the advent of digital communication is going to cause us not to need to travel. And, uh, what we've seen, you know, since the Dawn of the telephone is that it's actually been the opposite. The more you can know, somebody even a little bit, uh, at distance, the hungry you are to go see them in person, whether it's a business contact or someone you're in love with, um, no matter what it is, there's still that appetite to be there in person. And so I think what we're seeing with the digitization of communication is ultimately going to be very, um, uh, it's very complimentary with supersonic because you can get to know somebody a little bit over a long distance. You can have some kinds of exchanges and then you're, and then the friction for be able to see them in person is going to drop. And that is, uh, that's a wonderful combination. >>I think everybody on the planet welcomes that for sure, given what we've all experienced in the last year, you can have a lot of conversations by zoom. Obviously this was one of them, but there is to your point, something about that in-person collaboration that really takes things can anyway, to the next level. I am curious. So you launched XB one in October, as I mentioned a minute ago, and I think I read from one of your press releases planning to launch in 2025, the overture with over 500 trans oceanic routes. What can we expect from boom and the next year or two, are you on track for that 2025? >>Yeah. Things are going, things are going great. Uh, so to give a sense of what the next few years hold. So we rolled out the assembled XB one aircraft this year, uh, next year that's going to fly. And so that will be the first civil supersonic, uh, flying aircraft ever built by an independent company. Uh, and along the way, we are building the foundation of overture. So that design efforts happening now as XB one is breaking the sound barrier. We'll be finalizing the overture design in 22, we'll break ground in the factory in 23, we'll start building the first airplane and 25, we'll roll it out. And 26 we'll start flight tests. And, uh, and then we'll go through the flight test methodically, uh, systematically as carefully as we can, uh, and then be ready to carry passengers as soon as we are convinced that safe, which will be right around the end of the decade, most likely. >>Okay. Exciting. And so it sounds like you talked about the safety protocols that you guys put in place in the office, which is great. It's great to hear that, but also that this, this time hasn't derailed because you have the massive capabilities of, to be able to do all of the work that's necessary, way more than was done with before with the Concorde. And that you can do that remotely with cloud is a big facilitator of that communication. >>Yeah. You're able to do the cloud enables a lot of computational efficiencies. And I think about the, um, many times projects are not measured in how many months or years exactly does it take you to get done, but it's actually much easier to think about in terms of number of iterations. And so every time we do an airplane iteration, we look at the aerodynamics high speed. We look at the low speed. We look at the engine, uh, we look at the, the weights. Uh, we look at stability and control. We look at pilots, light aside, et cetera, et cetera. And every time you do an iteration, you're kind of looking around all of those and saying, what can I make better? But each one of those, uh, lines up a little bit differently with the rest now, for example, uh, uh, to get the best airplane aerodynamically, doesn't have a good view for the pilot. >>And that's why Concord had that droop nose famously get the nose out of the way so we can see the runway. And so we're able to do digital systems for virtual vision to let the pilot kind of look through the nose of the runway. But even then they're, trade-offs like, how, how good of an actual window do you need? And so your ability to make progress in all of this is proportional to how quickly you can make it around that, that iteration loop, that design cycle loop. And that's, that's part of where the cloud helps us. And we've, we've got some, uh, uh, some stuff we've built in house that runs on the cloud that lets you basically press a button with a whole set of airplane parameters. And bam, it gives you a, it gives you an instant report. I'm like, Oh, was it that this is a good change or bad change, uh, based on running some pretty high fidelity simulations with a very high degree of automation. And you can actually do many of those in parallel. And so it's about, you know, at this stage of the program, it's about accelerating, accelerating your design iterations, uh, giving everyone of the team visibility into those. And then, uh, I think you get together in person as it makes sense to now we're actually hitting a major design milestone with over-treat this week and we're, COVID testing everybody and get them all in the same room. Cause sometimes that in-person collaboration, uh, is really significant, even though you can still do so much digitally. >>I totally agree. There's there's certain things that you just can't replicate. Last question since my brother is a pilot for Southwest and retired Lieutenant Colonel from the air force, any special training that pilots will have to have, or are there certain pilots that are going to be maybe lower hanging fruit, if they have military experience versus commercial flight? Just curious. >>Yeah. So our XB one aircraft is being flown by test pilots. There's one ex Navy one ex air force on our crew, but, uh, overture, uh, will be accessible to any commercial pilot. So, uh, think about it as if you're, if you're used to flying Boeing, it'd be like switching to Airbus, uh, or vice versa. So the, uh, Concord is a complicated aircraft to fly because they didn't have computers. And all the complexity, the soup of supersonic flight was right there and the pilots and an overture, all that gets extracted by software. And, uh, you know, the, the, the ways the flight controls change over speed regimes. You don't have to worry about it, but the airplane is handled beautifully, no matter what you're doing. And so, uh, and so there are many, many places to innovate, but actually pilot experience, not one of them, >>Because the more conventional you can make it for people like your brother, the easier it's going to be for them to learn the aircraft. And therefore the safer it's going to be to fly. I'll let them know, like this has been fantastic, really exciting to see what boom supersonic is doing and the opportunities to make supersonic travel accessible. And I think at a time when everybody wants the world to open up, so by 20, 26, I'm going to be looking for my ticket. Awesome. Can't wait to have you on board. Likewise for Blake shul, I'm Lisa Martin. You're watching the QS live coverage of AWS reinvent 2020.
SUMMARY :
It's the cube with digital coverage of AWS It's great to have you on the program. the sound barrier. And as, as many of you know, he actually passed yesterday, uh, 97. We want to enable you to cross the Atlantic, And I did see the news about Chuck Yeager last night. And so there are, there are a bunch of revolutions in technology that have happened since Concord's time that And you arrive at an aerodynamic design that is more That's incredible born in the cloud to fly in the cloud. as an example, uh, you can run machine learning models to calibrate your simulations And that sounds like kind of one of the biggest differences that you just said is that it wasn't built for mainstream before. And as you continue to iterate all over the airplane, it's going to update the cloud on, you know, uh, are the engines running expected temperature. that you got, being able to stay on track and imagine if you were on track to launch in October And, uh, and so, you know, part of the company runs digitally. uh, what we've seen, you know, since the Dawn of the telephone is that it's actually the last year, you can have a lot of conversations by zoom. Uh, and along the way, we are building the foundation of overture. And that you can do that remotely with cloud is a big facilitator of that communication. And every time you do an iteration, you're kind of looking around all of those And then, uh, I think you get together in person as There's there's certain things that you just can't replicate. And, uh, you know, the, the, the ways the flight controls change over Because the more conventional you can make it for people like your brother, the easier it's going to be for them to learn
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chuck Yeager | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
1968 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2025 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
27 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
60 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
525 terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
1949 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Airbus | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Hawaii | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Blake Scholl | PERSON | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Boeing | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first airplane | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Blake shul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last night | DATE | 0.99+ |
Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Concord | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
XB one | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
more than 500 cores | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Atlantic | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.98+ |
hundred percent | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.97+ |
Jaeger | PERSON | 0.96+ |
this week | DATE | 0.96+ |
more than 500 trans oceanic routes | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Southwest | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
24 >> hours | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
XP | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.94+ |
Soviet union | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
a minute ago | DATE | 0.93+ |
first hit | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
three-day business | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
over 12 | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
26 | OTHER | 0.92+ |
Concorde | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
25 | OTHER | 0.91+ |
first civil | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
26 | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
about a dozen wind tunnel tests | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
each one | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
over 500 trans oceanic routes | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Navy | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
one airplane | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Blake shoulda | PERSON | 0.88+ |
Dawn of the industrial revolution | EVENT | 0.87+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Usman Nasir, Verizon | AIOps Virtual Forum 2020
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of AI ops Virtual Forum Brought to you by Broadcom Welcome back to the Broadcom AI Ops Virtual Forum Lisa Martin here talking with Usman Naseer Global Product Management at Verizon we spend Welcome back. >>Uh huh. Hello, Good >>to see you. So 2020 The year of that needs no explanation. With the year of massive challenges, I wanted to get your take on the challenges that organizations are facing this year as the demand to deliver digital products and services has never been higher. >>Yeah, I e I think this is something is so close to all the part part right? It's something that's impacted the whole world equally. And I think regardless off which industry you win, you have been impacted by this in one form or the other and the i c t industry, the information and communication technology industry. You know, Verizon being really massive player in that whole arena, it has just been sort of struck with this massive confirmation that we have talked about for a long time. We have talked about these remote surgery capabilities whereby you got patients in Kenya were being treated by experts sitting in London or New York and also this whole consciousness about, you know, our carbon footprint and being environmentally conscious. This pandemic has taught a school of that and brought this to the forefront off organizational priority, right? The demand. I think that Zaveri natural consequence of everybody sitting at home. And the only thing that can keep things still going is the data communication, Right? But I would just say that that is what kind of at the heart of all of this. Just imagine if we are to realize any of these targets that the world is world leadership is setting for themselves. Hey, we have >>to be carbon >>neutral by Xia as a country as a geography, etcetera etcetera. You know, all of these things require you to have this remote working capability this remote interaction, not just between human but machine to machine interaction. And this is a unique value chain which is now getting created that you've got people we're communicating with other people or were communicating with other machines. But the communication is much more. I won't even use the term really time because we've used real time for voice and video, etcetera. We're talking low latency microsecond to see and making that can either cut somebody's, you know, um, our trees or that could actually go and remove the tumor, that kind of stuff. So that has become a reality. Everybody's asking for it. Remote learning, being an extremely massive requirement where, you know, we've had to enable these thes virtual classrooms ensuring the type of connectivity, ensuring the type of type of privacy which is just so, so critical. You can't just have everybody you know, Go on the internet and access the data source. You have to be. I'm sorry about the integrity and security of >>that. They've >>had the foremost. So I think all of these things, Yes. We have not been caught off guard. We were should be pretty forward looking in our, you know, plans in our evolution. But yes, it does this fast track a journey that we would probably the least we would have taken in three years. It has brought that down to two quarters where we had to execute them. >>Right? Massive acceleration. All right, so you articulated the challenges really well and a lot of the realities that many of our viewers air facing. Let's talk now about motivations ai ops as a tool as a catalyst for helping organizations overcome those challenges. >>So, yeah, now all that I said you can imagine, you know, it requires microsecond the sea and making which human being on this planet can do microsecond the sea and making on complex network infrastructure, which is impacting, and user applications which have multitudes off effect. You know, in real life, I used the example of a remote surgeon. Just imagine, if you know, even because you just lose your signal on the quality of that communication for that microsecond, it could be the difference between killing somebody in saving somebody's life. Is that particular? We talk about autonomous vehicles way talk about the transition to electric vehicles, smart motorways, etcetera, etcetera in federal environment. How is all of that going to work? You have so many different components coming in. You don't just have a natural can security anymore. You have software defined networking that's coming becoming a part of this. You have mobile edge computing that is rented for the technologies. Five g enables we're talking augmented reality. We're talking virtual reality all of these things require that resource is. And while we carbon conscious, we don't just wanna build a billionaire, a terrorist on the planet, right? We we have to make sure that resource is air given on demand and the best way of re sources can be given on demand and could be most efficient. Is that we're making is being made at million microsecond. And those resource is our accordingly being distribute. Right? If you're 10 flying on, people sipping their coffee is having teeth talking to somebody else. You know, just being away on holiday. I don't think we're gonna be able to handle that world that we have already stepped into. Risen's five g has already started businesses on the transformational journey where they're talking about end user experience, personalization. You're gonna have, you know, events where people are going to go. And it's going to be three dimensional experiences that are purely customized for you. How How does that all happen without this intelligence having their and a network with all of these multiple layers assaults spectrum, it doesn't just need to be intuitive. Hey, this is my private I p traffic. This is public traffic. You know it has to now be into or this is an application that to privatize over another has to be intuitive to the criticality in the context, off those transactions again that surgeons surgery is much more important than husband sitting and playing a video game. >>Yeah, I'm glad that you think that that's excellent. Let's go into some specific use cases. What are in some of the examples that you gave? Let's kind of dig deeper into some of that. What you think are the lowest hanging fruit for organizations, kind of pan industry to go after here. >>Excellent, right? And I think this just like different ways to look at the lowest timing food. Like for somebody like Verizon, who is the managed services provider, you know, very comprehensive medicines. But we obviously have food timing much lower than potentially for some of our customers who want to go on that journey, right? So for them to just >>go and try and >>harness the power of help, the food's might be a bit higher hanging. But for somebody like God, the immediate ones would be to reduce the number off alarms that are being generated by these overlays services. You've got your basic network. Then you've got your software defined networking. On top of that, you have your hybrid clouds. You have your edge computing coming on top of that, you know? So ALOF this means if there is an outrage on one device on the network, gonna make this very real for everybody, right? It's right out. I'm not divisive. Network does not stop all of those multiple applications for monitoring tools from raising havoc and raising thousands off alarms and everyone capacity. If people are attending to those thousands off alarms, it's like you having a police force. And there's a burglary in one bank and the alarm goes off in $50. How you gonna make the best use of your police force? You're gonna go investigate 50 banks? You wanna investigate one where the problem is. So it's as realize that and I think that's the first wind where people can save so much cost, which is currently being wasted. And resource is running around primary figure stuff up immediately. Anti this with network and security network and security is something which has eluded even the most. You know, amazing off brings in or engineering. Well, we took it. We have network expert, separate people. Security experts separate people to look for different things. But there are security events that can impact the performance of the network and then use your application, cetera, etcetera, which could be falsely attributed to the network. And then if you've got multiple parties, which are then which have to clear stakeholders, you can imagine the blame game that goes on pointing fingers, taking names, not taking responsibility. That is how all this happened. This is the only way to bring it all together to say Okay, this is what takes priority. If there's an event that has happened, what is its correlation to the other downstream systems, devices, components and user applications. And it subsequently, you know, like isolating into the right cause where you can most effectively resolve that problem. Certainly, I would say on demand virtualized resource virtualized resource is the heart and soul of the spirit of status that you can have them on them up so you can automate the allocation of these. Resource is based on, you know, customers consumption, their peaks, their crimes. All of that comes in. You see Hey, typically on a Wednesday, their traffic goes up significantly from this particular application. You know, going to this particular data center, you could have this automated this AI ops, which is just providing those resource, is, you know, on demand and tell us to have a much better commercial engagement with customers and just a much better service assurance model. And then one more thing on top of that, which is very critical, is that, as I was saying, giving that intelligence to the network to start having context of the criticality of a transaction that doesn't exist to it. You can't have that because for that you need to have this, you know, multi layer data. You need to have multiple system which are monitoring and controlling different aspects of your overall and user application value chain to be communicating with each other. And, you know, that's that's the only way to sort of achieve that goal. And that only happens with AI off. It's not possible with them. You can paradise Comdex. >>So Guzman, you clearly articulated some obvious low hanging for use cases that organizations can go after. Let's talk now about some of the considerations you talked about the importance of the network in AI ops. The approach, I assume, needs to be modular support needs to be heterogeneous. Talk to us about some of those key considerations that you would recommend >>absolutely. So again, basically starting with the network. Because if there is, if the network sitting at the middle of all of this is not working, then things from communicate with each other, right? And the cloud doesn't work. Nothing. None of this person has hit the hardest all of this. But then subsequently, when you talk about machine to machine communication or i o T. Which is the biggest transformation to spend, every company is going priority now to drive those class efficiencies enhancements. We've got some experience. The integrity off the tab becomes paramount, right? The security integrity of that. How do you maintain integrity off your detail beyond just the secured network components that Trevor right? That's where you get into the whole arena Blockchain technology where you have these digital signatures or barcodes that machine then and then an intelligent system is automatically able to validate and verify the integrity of the data and the commands that are being executed by those and you determine. But I think the terminal. So I o. T machines, right, that is paramount. And if anybody is not keeping that into their equation, that in its own self, is any eye off system that is therefore maintaining the integrity off your commands and your quote that sits on those those machines Right. Second, you have your network. You need to have any off platform, which is able to rationalize all the fat network information, etcetera. And couple that with that. The integrity peace. Because for the management, ultimately, they need to have a co haven't view off the analytics, etcetera, etcetera. They need to. They need to know where the problems are again, right? So let's see if there's a problem with the integrity off the commands that are being executed by a machine. That's a much bigger problems than not being able to communicate with that machine. And the first thing because you'd rather not talk to the machine or haven't do anything if it's going to start doing the wrong thing, So I think that's where it's just very intuitive. It's natural. You have to have subsequently if you have some kind of say and let me use that use case Off Autonomous comes again. I think we're going to see in the next five years it's much water rates, etcetera. It will set for autonomous because it's much more efficient. It's much more space, etcetera, etcetera. So whether that equation you're gonna have systems which will be specialist in looking at aspects and Trump's actions related to those systems, for example, an autonomous moving vehicle's brakes are much more important than the Vipers, Right? So this kind of intelligence, there will be multiple systems who have to sit and nobody has to. One person has to go and on these systems, I think these systems should be open source enough that you are able to integrate them, right? If something sitting in the cloud you were able to integrate for that with obviously the regard off the security and integrity off their data, that has two covers from one system to the extremely. >>So I'm gonna borrow that integrity theme for a second as we go into our last question. And that is this kind of take a macro. Look at the overall business impact that AI ops can help customers make. I'm thinking of, you know, the integrity of teams aligning business and I t. Which we probably can't talk about enough. We're helping organizations really effectively measure KP eyes that deliver that digital experience that all of us demanding consumers expect. What's the overall impact? What would you say in separation? >>So I think the overall impact is a lot. Of course, that customers and businesses give me term got prior to the term enterprises defense was inevitable. There's something that for the first time will come to light. And it's something that is going to, you know, start driving cost efficiencies and consciousness and awareness within their own business, which is obviously going to have, you know, abdominal kind of an effect. So what example being that, you know, you have a problem? Isolation? I talked about network security, this multilayered architectural which enables this new world of five g um, at the heart of all of it. It is to identify the problem to the source, right? Not be bogged down by 15 different things that are going wrong. What is causing those 15 things to go wrong, right that speed to isolation and its own self can make millions and millions off dollars to organizations every organization. Next one is obviously overall impacted customer experience. The five g waas. You can have your customers expecting experiences from you, even if you're not expecting to deliver them in 2021 2022. You'll have customers asking for those experiences or walking away if you do not provide those experiences. So for it's almost like a business can do nothing. Every year they don't have to reinvest if they just want to die on the wine. Businesses want to remain relevant. Businesses want to adopt the latest and greatest in technology, which enables them to, you know, have that superiority and continue it. So from that perspective that continue ity, we're ready that there are intelligence system sitting, rationalizing information and making this in supervised by people, of course, who were previously making some of those here. >>That was a great summary because you're right, you know, with how demanding consumers are. We don't get what we want. Quickly we turn right, we go somewhere else, and we could find somebody that can meet those expectations. So it was spent Thanks for doing a great job of clarifying the impact and the value that AI ops can bring to organizations. That sounds really now is we're in this even higher demand for digital products and services, which is not going away. It's probably going to only increase. It's table stakes for any organization. Thank you so much for joining me today and giving us your thoughts. >>Pleasure. Thank you. >>We'll be right back with our next segment.
SUMMARY :
AI ops Virtual Forum Brought to you by Broadcom Welcome With the year of massive challenges, I wanted to get your take on the challenges that organizations This pandemic has taught a school of that and brought this to the forefront off organizational You can't just have everybody you know, Go on the internet and access the data source. that. It has brought that down to two quarters where we had to execute them. and a lot of the realities that many of our viewers air facing. How is all of that going to work? What are in some of the examples that you gave? you know, very comprehensive medicines. You know, going to this particular data center, you could have this automated this AI ops, Let's talk now about some of the considerations you talked about the importance You have to have subsequently if you have some kind of say and let me use I'm thinking of, you know, the integrity of teams aligning business and I t. There's something that for the first time will come to light. Thank you so much for joining me today and giving us your thoughts. Thank you.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Trump | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Kenya | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
50 banks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Usman Nasir | PERSON | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
millions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$50 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one bank | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Guzman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Broadcom | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one device | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Usman Naseer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
first wind | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
15 different things | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one system | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Trevor | PERSON | 0.97+ |
two quarters | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.95+ |
first thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Risen | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Wednesday | DATE | 0.93+ |
2021 2022 | DATE | 0.93+ |
million microsecond | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
One person | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
five g | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Five g | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Comdex | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
one form | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Vipers | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
next five years | DATE | 0.82+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
God | PERSON | 0.79+ |
thousands off | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
this year | DATE | 0.79+ |
millions off | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
one more thing | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.64+ |
AIOps Virtual Forum | EVENT | 0.61+ |
Next | QUANTITY | 0.55+ |
Zaveri | ORGANIZATION | 0.5+ |
Xia | ORGANIZATION | 0.45+ |
g | ORGANIZATION | 0.37+ |
Jonathan Nguyen-Duy, Fortinet | RSAC USA 2020
>>Fly from San Francisco. It's the cube covering RSA conference, 2020 San Francisco brought to you by Silicon angle media. >>Welcome back everybody. Jeffrey here with the cube. We're at RSA 2020, downtown San Francisco and Moscone center, 40,000 professionals in the security industries, the biggest security event in the world. I'm pretty sure, certainly the biggest one in the U S we're excited to have somebody who's been running around taking care of these problems and talking to customers for a very long time. It's got a great longterm perspective. We're happy to have him. Jonathan, new wind, the VP global field say-so team for fortunate. Jonathan, great to see you. So you said you've been coming to this show for a long, long time. Love to get kind of your impressions that the human element is the theme. Yeah, well, sheer, you know, I, I think, uh, it's changing. It's uh, the attendance is broken out by very senior people who've been here for, you know, multiple events and then a whole new slew of people are coming into the industry, right. >>And there's a lot of excitement. It's, um, there's a little bit less of a buzz. It just seems it's a little bit less people here this year because of the virus scare. Um, but overall I think that the themes are pretty consistent, which is kind of tragic that the themes are consistent year after year because this suggests that not a lot has changed despite the $130 billion and it works with purity span. You know, absolutely complexity. Uh, everyone is telling me about how to solve complexity, how to do more with less, uh, how to do more with less and fewer people and how to get their arms around this vast volume of data that's being generated. And there's a lot of talk about automation and AI, uh, but much more practical, less buzzwords and more practical solutions. And yet still tons of new vendors, right? Tons of new opportunities. >>You know, I don't know what the final count is on the vendor side, but it's a really large number and you go off into the corners to the EDBD little, little, a little mini boost is still a time of innovation. So I think that people trying to move the ball. So I think when the first show first started, there were less than a less than 500 vendors, I think in the industry back in 2007 I think today we're North of of 5,000 and it's probably 8,000 or about 5,000 vendors in the immediate vicinity here. But just go around the corner and there are dozens of others having their own events and the neighboring hotels and restaurants. It's astounding the number of different point products are still coming into the industry and, and, and that really suggests that we haven't gotten our arms around integrating all of this technology. >>And it's just another level of complexity. So what do you tell your friends on the buy side, right? Who know you and say, say Jonathan, I'm going, I'm going to RSA. How in the heck am I supposed to navigate not only the show specifically, but kind of this vendor landscape and then make sense of it all? I'm telling him to look for vendors that are partners that have a longterm perspective and that do the integration for you. You know, one of the things coming from an operational background, as I talked to other CSOs, like our job is to operate technology. It really isn't about integrating technology. It really isn't about OAA and product. I want to focus my budget and my resources on operating technologies and manage risk. So I look for partners and mentors like, like Fordanet that has a fabric with 258 plus different products and vendors that are already integrated out of the box. >>I'm looking for someone that solves complexity rather than a specific problem or specific threat vector. And I'm really looking for some of that helps me understand and manage risk because that's the object of the exercise in cybersecurity today. It's not about compliance, it's about compliance, it's about security, it's about resilience, but a reasonable level of care in managing risk. Right. And yeah, it's, it's a great topic cause I was thinking that kind of in terms of insurance. Yeah. In terms of, you know, how much do you spend and you can't insure everything to 100% right. So it's going to be some number less than that. Everybody else needs a piece of the pie. But how do you make those kinds of trade offs, investment versus risk? Because you can't absolutely protect everything. It makes no sense. So I think that value of it comes back to the CSO and his or her team. >>It's a very human decision. Uh, there is no prescriptive definition of what reasonable care is. You know, outside of one statement by Kamala Harrison, she was the state's attorney in California here, which is the CIS 20 is the minimum level of reasonable care. And so now we have to understand how do we define what is reasonable, what is the risk appetite or tolerance for a company? And once you identify those things, what are the controls and mitigation measures that you're gonna have in place to mitigate those risks? And then what's left is residual risk. And that's a hard decision. How much will you absorb? How much will you transfer, uh, and how much will you just tolerate? Um, but it's really no longer just about compliance, uh, and it's no longer just about having a security or continuity or resilience about all of those things. At a reasonable level. >>Right. It's interesting as pulling up Winnie Naylor from, from Cisco gave one of the early ketos and she talked about, you know, really this security profession, embracing those pesky people that keep clicking on links because really they're the people that can, that have the data around the specific, um, applications and specific assets that the company has to kinda have that informed decision as to what is it worth to protect and do we need to protect it? Do we need to protect them more? Can we let this thing go a little bit? Yeah. I think the human element is the hardest part, you know, in mind at this conference and its theme, that human element. The hardest part about this job is that it's not just mechanical issues on routing issues and networking issues, but it's about dealing with all types of humans, innocent humans that do strange and bad things unknowingly. >>And then malicious people who do very bad things that by design. And so the research suggests that no matter what we do in security awareness training, some 4% of our employee base will continually fail security awareness tests. Well, we fished actively. And so one of the things that we need to do is use automation and intelligence so that you could comb through all of that data and make a better informed decision about what risks you're going to mitigate, right? And for this 4% that are habitually abusing the system and can't be retrained while you can isolate them, right, and make sure that they're, they're separated and they're not able to, uh, to do things that may harm the organization. Right. The other human element is the people on the security teams, right. And it's a tough resource. There aren't enough of them. And, and, and historically, they'd been the ones that, that integration point between all these different systems and it's a highly stressful job. >>You know, there was a Forbes article that said 17% of all CSOs are functional alcoholics. I mean, I mean, and they met as a 17 for 17%. One of every six CSOs medicates himself or herself with alcohol. And medicate is a very specific term of art. It doesn't mean recreational drinking means you are a functional alcoholic and that tells you about the level of stress and complexity. You know, in this job, our research suggests that the average CSO lifespan is somewhere on the low end of about 12 months on the high end, somewhere about 24. You know, in their role or in their profession, their role and their current job, their current gig, they're not lasting more than than two years. Uh, the sheer complexity and stress of the job and you know, and, and those, of course, 24 months, three of those months are just orientation cause that gives you an idea. >>It's a level of stress and complexity that the average CSO is going to face here. Right. So really begs for a lot more automation, a lot more automation on the defense side. It does, it, it makes for a lot more automation. And how do you help those teams cope with a massive levels of complexity and data that's coming out of these digitized and digitally transformed enterprises, right? And when you think about each person's going to generate three to five terabytes of data per person per day, uh, and that computing is going to change in the next three to five years. Right now 85% of computing and data generated comes from traditional it functions as you move into 5g and edge based computing, the vast majority of data generating computing will be done on the edge. So the level of complexity, the number of technologies and devices that we're going to have to monitor is only going to expand, right? >>Right, right. And the speed of those transactions and the speed of the potential harm. So marry that against the research data says that 99% of the attacks could have been mitigated through simple intermediate controls and that the patches, the signatures were readily available. And so the thing to contemplate as we go into this heightened level of complexity and expansion of our computing environment is we're missing the basics today, right? Right. If 99% of the successful attacks are based upon exploits that are known that the signatures are available in the patches available for then a year, what are we going to do when everything else becomes even more complex, more sophisticated. Yeah. That's funny. That was part of, of of raw heats keynote, uh, to kick off the whole thing is he said, you know, we as security professionals like to focus on the complex, we like to focus on the, the ornate and the, and the super sophisticated attacks on the reality is the vast majority and we're just coming right in the normal side door that they've been coming in all along. >>And one thing I decided during my time at the Verizon data breach investigations report was a 77% of all the breaches were not identified by the security team. They were identified by law enforcement. And so 77, 77% of the case. So let's, so let's say you've got a CIS admin that that goes out and accesses financial information before the earnings call and does insider trading. And it's the sec that calls the FBI. And then it's the FBI that calls you and said, by the way, your CIS admin is going to be charged with insider trading. And that's how they know that there's been a compromise out. And in many cases, what does that tell you? Despite $130 billion of network security spend this year alone, that's seven out of 10 data breaches will be identified by law enforcement and not the security team. Yeah. So that tells you that not the security law enforcement team, either it's the FBI or the sec hires the cl service and it just says that security is so complex that until we find ways like the FORNAS security fabric to automate and to manage complexity in an integrated way, you know, that's the, that's the leading edge indicator that I look for is that at what point do security teams identify more data breaches then law enforcement and the victims and they're way behind at this point? >>I think so, unfortunately. Yes. That's crazy. So, um, but there's a lot more AI now that you guys can use to write on the good guys side. But how does that really square the circle when you're saying so many of it just comes through the simple approaches because of lack of visibility. Uh, SOC teams are overwhelmed by the volume of data. And so the way to address the volume and variety and velocity of data is to use artificial intelligence to use a machine to make human decisions and behavior at machine speed. And so when we launched our 40 AI product offering and the virtual security analysts, you know, the research that we did suggest that is he pivoted a five SOC analysts. And so that's one way of helping SOC teams that are overwhelmed by the volume of data that are understaffed, to use artificial intelligence to distill out from all of that, that data, that useful patterns, and to marry that with our Florida guard intelligence, say, okay, this is the techniques, tactics and procedures most likely associated with this threat vector right now, escalate that to a human to make a decision on whether you want to mitigate that. >>And once you decide to mitigate that, use the automated and integrated capabilities of the fabric to make an efficient and effective, uh, mitigation, uh, of that incident. Right? Yeah. Yeah. That's interesting. You bring up the sec case. We had a conversation earlier today where we were talking about deep fakes. Yeah. If somebody had the use case that, you know, what, if you just had a pretty straight forward, deep fake of some executive from some companies saying something to move the market and you drop that into the, uh, into the social stream three minutes before the close on a Friday, you get a play off the off the margin leverage. Nobody gets to really investigate the thing until the four minutes are over. Markets are closed, right? You get a significant financials damage in a situation like that, not even really directly impacting the company system. Right. >>So you're, you're hitting on the fact that we are more interconnected than ever and that the traditional compensating controls that we would have used to mitigate that type of risk is not, not as effective. And so, you know, that's going to be a challenge moving forward. Everything is going to be more interconnected, accelerated and decisions will be driven by data. So it's all of those things will drive complexity. So maybe next year when we talk again, we'll see it and see that. But I'm a little, one of the reasons I'm, you know, I have a credit freeze personally is that I'm aware of things like, like deep fakes, uh, impersonations moving my identities. So having a credit freeze allows, allows me to know that no one can leverage my credit even if they have my data. Right. Interesting. So thanks. Question. We sit down here a year from now, uh, without the benefit of 20, 20 hindsight. >>Yeah. You know, what do you think the themes are going to be? What, what do you see as kind of this kind of short term move in the market based on some of these factors that you've identified? I think, uh, more automation, more uh, artificial intelligence ways of automating the traditional process was insecurity. The secondarily, I think there's going to be the rising awareness of edge based computing and smart systems, autonomous level five vehicles that are networked and rather than a sensory based awareness, smart homes, smart industrial applications, uh, that computing will be done on the edge increasingly and those industrial applications, that 85% of the data computer will be done there. And that increasingly the cloud will become a repository for, for, uh, for storage and correlation. But the actual computing and actuation will be done on the edge. And so as 5g takes hold, you're going to see tremendous transformations in our society and our economy and how we conduct commerce, how we communicate. >>Uh, and that leads some more complexity. That's why, that's why I'm so focused on helping organizations getting security right now before that next onslaught of complexity hits us. It's coming. It is the five G IOT thing is, is just around the corner. The look at the telcos, there is a very specific reason why they're investing literally hundreds of billions of dollars into five G and the tremendous societal and economic changes that that will bring in infrastructure, communications and security will have to stay pace with that. One of the things that we're going to see moving forward is that the digital infrastructure is only successful only as successful as a security is. And I think we'll, we should see a breakdown in the traditional operational silos in network operations and security operations as Michelle Dennett. He said earlier on the air, if you cannot protect, you should not connect. But unfortunately people are still connecting before they're ready to. Absolutely. Well, hopefully there'll be a little bit more circumspect going forward. We'll try Jonathan, thanks for, uh, for taking a few minutes and sharing your perspective. Really appreciate it. Always a fun time. Alright, Jonathan, I'm Jeff. You're watching the cube where at RSA 2020 from downtown San Francisco. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time.
SUMMARY :
RSA conference, 2020 San Francisco brought to you by Silicon the attendance is broken out by very senior people who've been here for, you know, multiple events and then because of the virus scare. off into the corners to the EDBD little, little, a little mini boost is still a time of innovation. You know, one of the things coming from an operational background, as I talked to other of the exercise in cybersecurity today. And once you identify those things, what are the controls and mitigation measures that you're gonna have in place I think the human element is the hardest part, you know, And so one of the things that of the job and you know, and, and those, of course, 24 months, three of those months It's a level of stress and complexity that the average CSO is going to face here. And so the thing to contemplate as we go into this heightened And it's the sec that calls the FBI. And so the way to address the volume and variety and velocity of data is to use artificial intelligence If somebody had the use case that, you know, what, if you just had a pretty straight forward, But I'm a little, one of the reasons I'm, you know, I have a credit freeze personally is And that increasingly the cloud He said earlier on the air, if you cannot protect, you should not connect.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Michelle Dennett | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
FBI | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kamala Harrison | PERSON | 0.99+ |
California | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jonathan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$130 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Verizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2007 | DATE | 0.99+ |
85% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
99% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jonathan Nguyen-Duy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
17% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
77, 77% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24 months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
17 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
8,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
77% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
40,000 professionals | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Fordanet | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
four minutes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
RSA | EVENT | 0.98+ |
10 data breaches | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
FORNAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Moscone | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
dozens | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each person | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about 5,000 vendors | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about 12 months | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Fortinet | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
more than than two years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
five SOC | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
40 AI | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one statement | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
this year | DATE | 0.95+ |
hundreds of billions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Friday | DATE | 0.95+ |
RSAC | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
one way | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Winnie Naylor | PERSON | 0.94+ |
level five vehicles | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Florida | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
Tons of new opportunities | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
less than 500 vendors | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
about 24 | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
a year | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
earlier today | DATE | 0.9+ |
258 plus | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
less than a | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
RSA 2020 | EVENT | 0.9+ |
first show | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
EDBD | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
RSA | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Silicon angle | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
5,000 | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Forbes | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
USA | LOCATION | 0.79+ |
three minutes | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
U S | LOCATION | 0.77+ |
2020 | EVENT | 0.74+ |
CIS | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
Jeffery Snover, Microsoft | Microsoft Ignite 2019
>>Live from Orlando, Florida. It's the cube covering Microsoft ignite brought to you by Cohesity. >>Welcome back everyone to the cubes live coverage of Microsoft ignite. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, along with my cohost. We are joined by Jeffrey Snuffer. He is a technical fellow, Oh three 65 intelligence substrate at Microsoft. Most famous for being the father of PowerShell and one of the key architects of the window server. Thank you so much for coming on, for returning to the show. Yeah, thanks. It's great to be back. So first of all, define your, you're relatively new to this role, so tell us a little bit about what you're doing and what is the intelligent substrate. >> Yes, so you know, a lot of people get this confused as intelligence substrate. There's all three 65 the Microsoft graph. And when I do, as I say, Hey, the best way to think about this as an analogy to an operating system, operating systems are complex, but at the end of the day, they're really, really simple. >>They only do three things. They manage and protect resources. They provide services for developers, right services, API APIs and common controls. And then they provide a base set of applications and a way to get additional applications. So windows manage, CPU, memory, the services when 32 API eyes and then the applications like the browser, et cetera. So all three 65 can really be viewed as an operating system. Sounds strange. Why? Because most operating systems have been operating systems for devices, an operating system for phone, an operating system for a PC and operating system for a server. This is an operating system for people and organizations. So when we think about those three responsibilities, resources and you know, protecting and managing resources, these are the resources for people in organizations. So it's their identity, their, their emails, their chats, their documents, services for developers. These where there's wind 32 for windows, we have ms graph, that's our public API, but then we have services to be able to create, collaborate and communicate documents and interactions. >>And then the applications are things like teams and outlook, et cetera. And so then, Oh, sorry. Then the substrate, the substrate, sort of at the core of it. That's one of our core services. It is storage and then a set of services to manage that and set of services. So the storage is basically a planetary scale, no sequel data store. So every time you create a chat and email document or whatever, it gets stored in the substrate and then three additional copies are created, one of them at least 250 miles away. That's why our date availability and high availability are one thing. So everything gets stored there and then that allows us to do common services like search against it. Does that make sense, >>Jeffrey? Well, one of the biggest challenge people have is when you learn about something and then it has changed an awful lot. Yeah. I think back to the first time I used Microsoft word, Microsoft Excel, it wasn't connected to the internet exactly. Let alone talking about the era of global scale in AI and all of these things that can do in. So maybe give us a fresh as if I'm a brand new person and I, you know, I don't have the, you know, all of the legacy history with the Microsoft office family. What, what is the new, you know, people O us that you're talking about? >>Yeah. So I like to think of it as a back to the original office 1.0, if you remember the original office 1.0, you'd had word, Excel and PowerPoint. And I like to joke, I say it was integrated with the advanced technology at that day of called cardboard, right? We just took the, the, the floppy disks from each one of those products, put it in a cardboard box and said it's a suite. But then it was a vision to a vision of how things should work together to help the individual. And then after that version one, then we reorganized the organization to have common technology teams. And that's when we started to get common controls, common user experience, et cetera, common file formats. Uh, and then it became a true integrated suite. Same thing happened when we went to the cloud. We had all these products that would have a front end couple to a back end, another front end, couple to a back end, another front end coupled a backend. >>Each one would have one or more SDKs, et cetera. And when we first brought them to the cloud, it was the same sort of thing, integrate it with an offering and a name. But there was a vision there. And then that vision drove the reality. And what we did was we said, Hey, let's figure out how to have a common storage for these things. Common backend, a common way to communicate, a common way to do messaging. And then that took a number of years. But that's what drives this consistency. And so that's why when you go and you say, I would like to search for something, you'll find that term, whether it's in your word documents or it's in your emails or your team chats or anything. It's that commonality that makes it answered question. It >>does. Um, so it's, I think about, you know, the era of collaboration and, you know, there were competitors to Microsoft that came out that were built on the internet and you know, deliver those solutions. So this week we've talked to, we haven't dug deep deep into teams, but everyone we've talked to that's using it, it's like, no, really this is a really great product and almost like, you know, forget about some of the things you might have remembered through some of those iterations and changes and things not working together. You know, teams has been built and is allowing some great collaboration, communication with remote workers, smaller businesses, the likes. So it's tough because especially if you're using one tool and you've gone over to some other tool set, it's like, Oh, I don't, why would I go back to that? But it's a very different, uh, Microsoft productivity suite today than, than we might have used in the past. >>That's exactly correct. And then the, into the, uh, uh, intelligent substrate is this layer of AI on top of the substrate, right? So part of that is search, but then we're also doing natural language processing. So basically imagine you saw a store of file in in a one drive that gets stored in one drive and a workflow gets kicked off and that workflow then goes and analyzes the contents of that file and create search terms, et cetera. So we then have common search and then we've got natural language processing that'll go and find, Hey, what are the key points for that document? How do I summarize that document? So then if you see it somewhere you can say, Oh, show me the file card. And I'll say, here's this document. You don't have to read the whole thing. Here are the three key points about it. >>And so the, this is, so to answer the question, why would a, why would a platform guy be working in office? It turns out that to build this AI infrastructure, it's really sort of a platform play. There's key advances that need to be made in, in AI. But actually when you get involved in AI, what you realize is what we really need is more engineering than more science. We need more science, no doubt about it. But boy, is there a need for engineering? Like I need to figure out how to get three to five to seven orders of magnitude more volume of AI going through the system. So when you talk about these key advances in AI that need to be made in terms of of applying them to O three 65 describe them for us and talk about how they will change the future of work and the way we collaborate with our team members in the way we communicate with our team members and, and in our productivity. >>Yeah. So this is where I get so excited about Microsoft's play, right? Because when I decided at the end of last year that I was gonna make a new change, I had a number of opportunities both inside and outside the company. And so the, the thing that really made me say, this is where I want to go was, well, one, it was most important new technology, AI on our most precious business asset, our customers data. So that was very exciting for really got me over the edge was Microsoft's approach to AI. Microsoft takes a very different approach to AI than our competitors, right? The heart of most AI is trying to figure out you and you to achieve some result. Now our competitors do that to try and get you to click a button to buy an ad or to buy something you don't need or subvert some government that they want subverted, right? >>That's none of our peg objectives. We want to understand you for exactly one reason to make you successful, right? How do we, like in the past, people would throw the rock at Microsoft, say, Oh, you know, when I use Microsoft products, I got to understand the Microsoft org chart. You know, you ship my org chart. What they're really saying is that they have to understand the tools to get their job done. They have to navigate the tools. What we're trying to do is have the tools understand the person to help the person, help that person get their job done. So there's this great show, I think it was called the remains of day today, the movie with Anthony Hopkins, he played a Butler. And in that he did some research and he talked to the Butler of Buckingham palace who'd been there for 50 years and he said the essence of a great Butler is that he makes the room emptier when he enters. >>What's that mean? Well, when the, when someone sits down the magazine that they want, is there, the drink that they want is there. It just, it just all works out. Well, that's not my experience with computers today. I mean, how many times do you, you know, you end up at the end of the day and you're like, your spouse says, what'd you do to you day? You're like, wow, I dunno. I dunno. I'm just exhausted. Well, it shouldn't, doesn't have to be that way. What we want to do is to have the computer understand you, understand your objectives and not have some big splashy AI. It just, Oh, things just work. Oh, I'm coming to this meeting. Oh, the information I need for that meeting is just there. Oh, it prepped me and knew that I had a few minutes. And so it gave me a few minutes where it's a prep and things just flow. And at the end of the, you know, success will be when you end the day with more energy than you start it. Like that's a big tall tale, a big tall effort. But that's where we're going for that. Get stalled. >>Yeah. Well we, we found that the, the word that has summarized this week for us is one that Satya said over and over again and it was trust. So in today's day and age, there's a lot of cynicism and especially looking at big tech companies, you did a presentation talking about AI in social responsibility. You tease out a little bit of it there as to why you believe Microsoft is well intentioned with AI, but maybe share a little bit more about that vision for social responsibility and you know, where we need to go with AI as an industry as a whole. >>Yeah, exactly. So there's kinda two key points. First is I think there's a, a very vast, uh, misunderstanding of the state of AI Kang. It really is best understood as software 2.0 and we've been at software 1.0 for about 75 years and I don't think anybody thinks we're doing a particularly great job at event. I think we've started to make progress starting around the 1990s with the, with the core principles of, of uh, the worldwide web. That's when we started to really make some progress. But we still have lots of world's problems. So we're at software 2.0 we're at the very beginning of the beginning of the beginning. Now here's the point. The innovators set the field, the innovators set the path. And in AI it's important for Microsoft to be one of the key innovators here because of our approach, because we're standing up and saying, wait, there's great promise. >>There's great challenges, right? There are privacy challenges. There's data bias challenges, there's inclusivity challenges. There are things that really need to be addressed by governments, local legislation and global governments. Brad Smith has been particularly vocal on this and the need for a digital, the only way you're going to solve the problem of autonomous killer robots, which is a real thing, is by a digital Geneva convention. We, Microsoft can't solve that. IBM can solve that. Google can't solve that. Governments need to solve that. And so Microsoft is being very proactive in engaging the communities around these problems. For myself, for instance, I've been working with some of the security researchers to say, okay, well, software 2.0 how do you do threat model on machine learning? Nobody knows. Like literally nobody knows. And so we've been working over the course of the last year to produce a taxonomy of attacks. Now this is the initial thing, but it sparks a conversation as we've shown it to various government people and other, uh, competitors. Uh, they're very excited about this, about trying to join this in, to identify the class of attacks. Because once you can understand the class of attacks, then you begin understanding, well, how do I defend against those? But literally it doesn't exist. So, >>so talking about autonomous killer robots, I'm very worried now. So how do you, Jeffrey said you're talking about Microsoft's more measured approach and as you said, you are working with governments and work in reaching out to policy makers and regulators to talk about these things. Maybe unlike some other technology companies that aren't doing that. How do, are you a tech optimist at the end of the day or are you, but does it keep you up at night these, these, Nope. Nope, >>not at all. Not at all. No. I'm a wild Technomic dumbest people like are very pessimistic and I just like, yeah. You know, no. Like, let me give you an example, right? There's this, this thing that says, Oh, an autonomous car turns the corner at a high speed and it has to decide between killing two old man and a and a woman in a baby carriage. Right? And it's wide. This is a Philip philosophic philosophy problem called the trolley problem. Oh, a trolley driver has to pull a switch a, uh, and it was like over a hundred years old in the a hundred plus years that that's upon posited, there's been exactly zero trolley drivers ever put in this position. Just, it's just not an issue. Look, there are real issues. We do have to work these things. I'd say the biggest worry is not these killer robots or the autonomous cars going wild. >>It is complacency. It is overconfidence. It says, Oh, I got something to work. Let's just ship it. Like there's a lot of brittleness in these AI systems, right? Like, Oh, this works and it can be spectacular, but then this is a complete disaster and that's a complete disaster. So how do we get that taxonomy of like, Hey, when do we know when we're done? How do we test these things? How do I have like a, a secure supply chain for the data models as well as the code itself? You know, so. So I think that software one no doubt does not provide us any of the answers to the challenges of software 2.0 but I do believe that software 1.0 and its challenges tell us the areas that we need to apply our, our mindset to. And that's what we're doing. So >>Jeffrey, before we let you go, we do need to get the update on PowerShell. I have to say, ever since I've first talked to you, I feel like more and more when I go to shows, I hear people just talking about how it's helping their career, helping their business and in doing it, I don't know if it's just because you know, it was brought to the front of the mind and it's like, Oh no, I'm used to seeing that car model out there. But can you give us the latest on power shell even though you're no longer in that group? Oh yeah. I continue to meet with them all the time. >>I'm very active in PowerShell. So we took power shell and made a cross platform to run analytics. We've talked about that and I don't know where we were when we talked about that, but basically we sort of did it for our own purposes, right? We need to manage the world's estate and so we want to have a common infrastructure for doing that. And the joke was that the point is like, look, we're not confused. We don't think that the Unix people are going to greet us as liberator's. Like all, thank heavens, you know, I've been dying under this bash and such. Thank God Microsoft came to save us, right? There's no confusion. We'll surprise. We shifted and then the vast majority, the numbers are crazy. How many Linux people are using PowerShell. It's just insane and we don't really understand it. We're out there talking to people, but they just love it. >>So anyway, so PowerShell version seven is coming out. It'll come out officially at the end of the year, beginning of next year, and this really is the tool that then you can use to manage everything. Both windows and Linux. We have parallel for each, so you can do massive scale. But that's the one that really just brings all the pieces together and gains the critical mass. So we're very excited about it. always a scintillating conversation when you come on the show. Thank you so much for coming on. Thank you. I'm Rebecca Knight for Stu Miniman. Stay tuned for more of the cubes live coverage of Microsoft ignite.
SUMMARY :
Microsoft ignite brought to you by Cohesity. Thank you so much for coming on, for returning to the show. Yes, so you know, a lot of people get this confused as three responsibilities, resources and you know, protecting and managing resources, So every time you create Well, one of the biggest challenge people have is when you learn about something and then it has changed an awful And I like to joke, I say it was integrated with the advanced technology at that day of And so that's why when you go and you say, forget about some of the things you might have remembered through some of those iterations and changes and So then if you see it somewhere you can say, Oh, show me the file card. And so the, this is, so to answer the question, why would a, why would a platform guy be working in Now our competitors do that to try and get you to click a button to buy And in that he did some research and he talked to the Butler of Buckingham And at the end of the, you know, success will be when you end the day with more energy than you You tease out a little bit of it there as to why you believe Microsoft is well intentioned with AI, And in AI it's important for Microsoft to be one of the key innovators of the security researchers to say, okay, well, software 2.0 how do you do threat are you a tech optimist at the end of the day or are you, but does it keep you up at night We do have to work these things. It says, Oh, I got something to work. I continue to meet with them all the time. And the joke was that the point is like, look, we're not confused. at the end of the year, beginning of next year, and this really is the tool that then you can use
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeffrey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brad Smith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey Snuffer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeffery Snover | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Anthony Hopkins | PERSON | 0.99+ |
PowerShell | TITLE | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Excel | TITLE | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
one drive | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Satya | PERSON | 0.99+ |
word | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.99+ |
office 1.0 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
windows | TITLE | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
seven | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
last year | DATE | 0.98+ |
one tool | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
a hundred plus years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
one reason | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about 75 years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three key points | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
over a hundred years old | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three things | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
three additional copies | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
Each one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
next year | DATE | 0.95+ |
two old | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
each one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
Butler | PERSON | 0.92+ |
three responsibilities | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
Philip | PERSON | 0.91+ |
two key points | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
zero trolley drivers | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
32 | TITLE | 0.81+ |
Buckingham | LOCATION | 0.78+ |
end of last year | DATE | 0.77+ |
Tom Gillis, VMware & Tom Burns, Dell EMC | VMworld 2019
>> live from San Francisco, celebrating 10 years of high tech coverage. It's the Cube covering Veum World 2019 brought to you by the M wear and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome back. I'm Stew Minuteman here with John Troyer. We're have three days, Walter Wall coverage here at VM World 2019 with lobbying Mosconi North and happy to welcome to the program. To my right is Tom Burns, who is the senior vice president general manager of networking and Solutions at Delhi Emcee and sitting to his right. Another Tom. We have Tom Gillis, who's the S V p and general manager of networking of Security inside VM wear. So I'm super excited. Go back to my roots of networking. Tom and Tom thanks so much for joining us. >> Thanks for having us. Thanks for All >> right. So, you know, Tom, you and I have talked for years now about you know, it was not just s t n, but you know, the changes in the environment. Of course, you know, networking and compute, you know, smashing together and where the role of software in this whole environment has changed. So, you know, let's start, you know, there's some news. Let's get that cover the hard news first. VM Where has the networking pieces? Dell has some software networking pieces also, and there's some more co mingling of those. So maybe walk us through that. >> Absolutely. I think the story this week is about the collaboration that's happening between Tom's team and my team in kind of innovating and disrupting in the traditional networking world. You know, Tom Sad NSX around micro segmentation network virtualization lot going on with analytics and capability to really see what's going on. The network from Cord Out EJ to cloud the acquisition of RV, which is outstanding. Other things that are going on in Vienna, where deli emcee disrupting around the segregation of hardware and software, giving customers that capability to run the nasty need for the connective ity they need, depending upon where the network is sitting. So this week we got two announcements. One is we've got worldwide shipment of the Delhi M CST Land solutions powered by being more great, you know better than none. Software combined with better than none. Hardware coming from del you see, on a global basis worldwide, you know, secure supply chain plus professional service worldwide is a parameter there, right? >> And Tom, maybe bring us in. You know, we'd watch Fellow Cloud before the acquisition esti weigh on. You know, there's a lot of solutions that fit in a couple of different markets. It's not a homogeneous market there. Maybe give us just kind of the camp point from Avella Clubs. Esty Esty. >> Wind is a white Hart market on because it has the classic combination a better, faster, cheaper. It delivers a better end user experience. It is so easy to deploy this and it saves money, NPLs, circuits and back hauling traffic those that was, ah, 19 nineties idea. It was a good idea back then, but it's time for a different approach. >> And just when I've talked to some customers and talk to them about their multi cloud environment, SD Wind, one of those enabling technologies that you know they will bring up to a mad allowed them to actually do that. >> It was it was the movement really >> office 3 65 and sass applications that drove the best human revolution and that back hauling all this traffic to headquarters and then going out to office for 65 when a user might be in, You know, Des Moines, that doesn't make any sense. And so so with us, the win we intelligently route the traffic where it needs to go delivers a better end user experience, and it saves a bunch of money. It's not hard to imagine that cheap broadband links are on order of magnitude lower than these dedicated mpls circuits. And the interesting math is that you could take two or three low cost links and deliver a better experience than with a single dedicated circuit. >> I'm kind of interested in the balance between hardware and software, right? The family trees of networking and compute kind of were different because if they had specialized needs in silicon, so where are we now? It's 2019. Where are we now? With with line speeds and X 86 then the hardware story. >> I think it'll let Tom join the discussion around speeds and feeds is not dead, but it should be dying to get a quick right. You know, it's around virtual network functions and everything really moving to the software layer. Sitting on top of commoditized X 86 based you know, hardware and the combination of these two factors help our customers a lot more with flexibility, agility, time to deploy, return on investment, all these types of things. But I mean, that's my view is a recurring theme you're gonna hear. Is that in networking? And think you're alluding to this You needed these dedicated kind of magical black boxes that had custom hardware in order to do some pretty basic processing. Whether it be switching, routing, advanced security, you had to run things like, you know, hardware. Regular expression, matching et cetera was about three years ago that Intel introduced a technology called D P D. K, which is an acceleration that allowed VM wear to deliver in software on a single CPU. You know, we could push traffic at line rates, and so so or, you know, faster than one rates. And so that was sort of like there wasn't the champagne didn't go off in the, you know, the bald in drop in Times Square. But it's a really important milestone because all of a sudden it doesn't make any sense to build these dedicated black boxes with custom hardware. Now, general purpose hardware, when you have a global supply chain and logistics partner like Dell, coupled with distributed software, can not only replace these network functions, but we can do things completely differently. And that's really you know, we're just beginning this journey because it's only recently that we've been able to do that. But I think you're gonna see a lot more that in the future. >> So we talked about SD win. Uh, there was a second announcement >> that goes back into the court. You know, the creation of a fabric inside of the data center is still a bit difficult. I mean, I've heard quotes saying It's something like 120 lines of cli, you know, per switch. So let's say 4 to 6 Leafs pitches, switches and two spine switches could take days to set up a fabric. What we've announced is the smart Fabric Director, which is a joint collaboration and development between Veum Wear and Delhi emcee that creates this capability to tightly integrate NSX envy Center into the deli emcee power switch, family of data center switches, really eliminating several cases and in fact, setting up that same fabric in less than two minutes. And we're really happy about not just the initial release. But Tom and I have a lot of plans for this particular product and in the road map for, you know, quarters and years to come about really simplifying again, the network automating it. And then, really, our version of intent based networking is the networking operating the way you configured it, you know, when you set it up and I think not just not just on day one, but two, you know and a N and you know you hit the nail on the head. Networking has changed, is no longer about speeds and feeds. It's about availability and simplicity. And so, you know, Del and GM, where I think are uniquely positions to deliver a level of automation where this stuff just works, right? I don't need to go and configure these magic boxes individually. I want to just right, you know, a line of code where my infrastructure is built into the C I. C. D pipeline. And then when I deploy workload, it just works. I don't need an army of people to go figure that out right, and and I think that's the power of what we're working together to unleash. >> So when something technology comes up like like SD win. Sometimes there's a lot of confusion in the marketplace. Vendors going out one size fits all. This will do everything Course. Where are we in the development of SD win and what is the solution? Who should be looking at taking a look at the solution now? >> SD win market, as I said, is growing depend on whose estimate you look at between 50 and 100% a year. And the reason is better, faster, cheaper. Right? So everyone has figured out, you know, like maybe it's timeto think differently about about architecture and save some money. Eso we just announced it on the PM or side, an important milestone. We have more than 13,000 network virtualization customers that includes our data center as well as yesterday, and we don't report them separately. But 13,000 is, you know, that's almost double where it was a year ago. So significant customer growth we also announced were deployed together with our partner from Del 130,000 branches around the world. So by many metrics, I think of'em, where is the number one vendor in this space to your point it is a crowded, noisy space. Everybody's throwing their hat in the Rangel. >> We do it too. >> But I think the thing that is driving the adoption and the sales of our product is that when you put this thing in, it fundamentally changes the experience for the end user. There's not a lot of networking products that do that. Like I meet customers like this thing is magic. You plug it in and all this and streaming just works, you know, like Google hangouts or Web X is like they just work and they worked seamlessly all the time that there's something there that I think it's still unique to the PM or product, and I think it's gonna continue to drive sales in the future. So I think the other strong differentiation when it comes to Del Technologies bm where in Delhi emcee combined is we have this vision around the cloud. You know, EJ core cloud and you know this hybrid multi cloud approach. And obviously SD Ram plays a critical part as one of the stepping stones as relates toe, you know, creating the environment for this multi cloud environment. So, you know, fantastic market opportunity huge growth. As Tom said, markets probably doubling in size each year. I don't know what the damn numbers are. I hate to quote, but you know, we really feel is, though now having this product in this capability inside a deli emcee, again combining our two assets, it could be the next VX rail. We're really good way. Believe the esteem and it's gonna be a gigantic market. And I think that what's interesting about our partnership is that we can reach different segments of the market in a V M, where we tend to focus on the very high end, large enterprise customers. Technically very sophisticated, delicate, rich customers we don't even know we don't even talk to, And a product is simple enough that it works in all segments. We win the very, very biggest, and we win these. You know, smaller accounts where the simplicity of a one quick deployment really really matters. >> Tom. One of the things that excited me a year ago at this show was the networking vision for a multi cloud world reminded to be of nice syrup. React. You know, when we look at networking today, most remote network admin a lot of the network they need to manage. They don't touch the gear. They don't know where it lives, but they're still responsible. Keep it up and running. And if something goes wrong, it's there. It is the update as to where we stand with that where your >> customers are asking the question, right? So our mantra is infrastructure is code, and so no one should ever have to log in with switch. No one should have to look into a Q. And you know, we should have to be like trying to move packets from here. They're just It's very, very difficult. I'm not really feasible. And so So as networking becomes software and those general purpose processors I talk about are giving us the ability to to think about not just a configuration of the network but the operation of the network in ways that were never before possible. So, for example, we announce that the show today with our monitoring product ve realise network in sight. We call it Bernie, not always such clever with the names that were really good at writing code, Vernon gives us the ability to measure application response time from the data center all the way out to the edge. So a single pane of glass we can show you. Oh, here's where it's broken whether it's in the network, whether it's in the server, whether it's the database, that's that's not responding. And we do this all without agents, right? So it's like when the infrastructure gets smart enough to be able to provide that inside, it changes the way the customer operates on. That translates into real savings and real adoption. And that's what's driving all of this momentum, right? That 7 500 to more than 13,000 customers, something has to be behind that. I think it's It's the simplicity of automation. >> CLI has come up a couple times here, and so that's kind of a dirty word. Maybe even these days, it kind of depends on who you're talking with, I think Veum Way. Rendell both spent a lot of time and effort educating the networking engineering market and also educating the kind of data center you know, the rest of the data center crew about, you know, about each other's worlds. Where again, where are we at now? It sounds like with director on with the innocent. The NSX whole stack? Yes. Uh, the role is changing of a network engineer. But again, where are we in that? In that evolution? >> I think you know, we're early on, but it's moving quite rapidly. I think the traditional network in engineer and networking admin is gonna need to evolve. You know more to this, Dev Ops. How do I bring applications? How do I manage the infrastructure? More like a platform. I mean, Tom and I truly believe that the difference between cute and network infrastructure is really going to start to dissolve over time. And why shouldn't it? I mean, based upon what's happening with the commoditization and speeds of the CPU versus the MP use coming from Mersin silicon, it's really beginning to blur. So I think, you >> know, we're in the early >> stages. I mean, certainly from a deli, see perspective. We still, at times, you know, have those discussions and challenges with traditional networking people. But let's face it, they have a tough job. When something's not working, the network administrator usually gets blamed, And so I think it's a journey, uh, and things such as the del Technology Cloud Open networking, NSX, and now SD when it will continue to drive that. And I think we're going to see a rapid change in networking over the next 12 18 to 24 months. I talked to a number of customers that has said, You know, this journey that Tom was talking about is this is a challenge because the skill set is different. My developers need to learn software, and so what? We're working with the M where is trying t o make that software easier and easier to use it actually approach like English language. So latest versions of NSX have these very simple, declarative AP eyes that you can say, Oh, server A talk to server be but not server see, Click Don Deploy. And now, in our partnership with L, we can take that Paulson push it right down into the metal, right down into the silicon. And so so. Simplification and automation are the name of the game, but it is definitely a fundamental change in the skill set necessary to do Networking. Networking is becoming more like software as opposed to, you know, speeds and feeds and packet sniffers and more the old traditional approaches. >> Tom, I don't want to give you the final word as to Ah, you know what people should be taken away from Dell in and Veum wear in the networking space. Well, >> I think across deli emcee and in being work, there's a great amount of collaboration, whether it's the Del Technology Cloud with of'em were really taking the leadership from from that perspective with this multi hybrid cloud. But in the area of networking, you know, Trudeau. Five years ago, when we announced the desegregation of hardware and software, I am in this to disrupt a networking business and to make networking very different tomorrow and in the future than it has been in the past for our customers around. He's deployment, automation and management, and I think that's a shared vision with Tom and his team and the rest of BM, where >> Tom Gillis, Tom Burns, thank you so much faster. Having eight, we'll be back with more coverage here from VM 2019 for John Troyer on stew. Minutemen as always. Thanks for watching the Cube
SUMMARY :
brought to you by the M wear and its ecosystem partners. and Solutions at Delhi Emcee and sitting to his right. Thanks for having us. it was not just s t n, but you know, the changes in the environment. of the Delhi M CST Land solutions powered by being more great, you know better And Tom, maybe bring us in. It is so easy to deploy this and SD Wind, one of those enabling technologies that you know they will bring up to a mad allowed them to actually And the interesting math is that you could take two or three low cost links and deliver a better experience I'm kind of interested in the balance between hardware and software, right? And that's really you know, So we talked about SD win. And so, you know, Del and GM, Who should be looking at taking a look at the solution now? So everyone has figured out, you know, like maybe it's timeto think differently I hate to quote, but you know, we really feel is, though now having this product It is the update as to where we stand with that where your And you know, we should have to be like trying to move packets from here. also educating the kind of data center you know, the rest of the data center crew about, I think you know, we're early on, but it's moving quite rapidly. Networking is becoming more like software as opposed to, you know, speeds and feeds and packet sniffers and more the Tom, I don't want to give you the final word as to Ah, you know what people should be taken away from Dell But in the area of networking, you know, Trudeau. Tom Gillis, Tom Burns, thank you so much faster.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Burns | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Gillis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Vienna | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
120 lines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Troyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stew Minuteman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Veum Wear | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
NSX | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Del Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
less than two minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Delhi | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
more than 13,000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Walter Wall | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two assets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Five years ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Times Square | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Rendell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second announcement | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VM World 2019 | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Veum | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
M wear | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
two announcements | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each year | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
4 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
7 500 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VM wear | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one rates | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
two factors | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
6 Leafs | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.97+ |
Vernon | PERSON | 0.96+ |
Avella Clubs | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Bernie | PERSON | 0.95+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Veum Way | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Veum World 2019 | EVENT | 0.95+ |
Mosconi North | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Delhi | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Tom Sad | PERSON | 0.93+ |
English | OTHER | 0.93+ |
Dell EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Del 130,000 | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Eso | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
two spine switches | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
del Technology Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Fellow Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
GM | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
Cord | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
office 3 65 | TITLE | 0.86+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
about three years ago | DATE | 0.85+ |
more than 13,000 network virtualization | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
single pane | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Adam Justis, Adobe Experience Cloud | Adobe Imagine 2019
>> live from Las Vegas. It's the Cube covering magenta. Imagine twenty nineteen. Brought to You by Adobe. >> Hi, Welcome back to the Cube. Lisa Martin with Jeff Rick at Imagine twenty nineteen at the Wind, Los Vegas Talking all about e commerce, innovation and technology. Consumer changes. All that good stuff. Joining us next is Adam Justice, the director of product marketing for the Adobe Experience about Adam. Welcome to the Cube. >> Thank you for having me. Thank you. >> This is a really high energy event. >> It is >> all days palpable, but I think it might be partly because there's a lot of orange here. It's a pretty energizing color. People have had very interesting entrances and exits on stage, coming from above and below. We've heard a lot of great testimonials from partners, customers, Dobie, folks, the gentle folks. Customer experience is critical to any product. Any service retailer, big or small. So true. Talk to us about you've been with Adobe for a long time. Talk to us about were perspective. The essentials Really good customer experience. Management? >> Absolutely. Thank you. Thanks for the question. It's great to be here, so and don't >> be. We've really >> evolved. I think as sort of the needs and rolls of our customers have. And I think the primary motivator for their evolution has been the customer customer itself. And whereas it used to be enough for us to think about, we're going to provide winning product or a service. All of us can agree, and it's easy for us to, and it's easy for us to agree now because we're all a focus group of one. >> We know what >> we like. We like an experience that actually feels like it's worth having. It's not enough to just put a product or a service out there. It needs to feel like something that actually not only feels natural, but it feels additive to our lives in some way. And so what was once sort of ah, relatively sir straight forward product development process or promotional process now is very much about how we addressing the needs of the consumer in a way that it is holistic, that respects the channels, that they want to interact with our brand on that respects the devices through which they want to either consumer product or research. Our product so it will be, is really trying to sort >> of >> understand the dynamics of the market today and bring solutions to the customers who now have this broader sort of stewardship. And I would say the things that we're seeing that our core to that our first, you're not going to deliver a meaningful experience to a customer unless you understand that customer and understanding that customer largely now comes down to data and a lot of fix will feel like, Well, that certainly seems logical that were awash in data. How do we actually get to the point where the data is telling us the story so we can leverage that information than tell a brand story till some kind of present a compelling experience? And then you add to that the dynamics, obviously right now about and entirely justifiable concerns about my privacy and the regulations there. Adobes going directly at that. With it, it'LL be experienced platform in order to effectively coalesce a meaningful point of view or sort of representation of off the customer in a way that respects their privacy. That un experienced steward can then look at that and say, Not only do I understand who this person is, but I have context and an understanding of what it is they're looking for. What is their intent? What is the context of this interaction now? So I can present a meaningful experience that obviously gets you part of the way. And but then knowing is only half the battle, right? Maybe not even half. Then you actually have to kind of rally around. Well, what, uh, what tools and content do we have at our disposal to ultimately present a compelling experience? You know what it will be? We like to say that emotion is the currency of experience. And if you're not actually leveraging meaningful content and presenting it in context and you're not going to evoke an emotion that is worth evoking, so definitely have the data piece than the content piece. But I would also add, and you've probably had other people sitting in this seat talking about how the complexity of all that has certainly exceeded now the capacity of at least my brain to manage in a singular sort of engagement with a customer, let alone at scale millions of times a day. So the role of artificial intelligence and machine learning now is so corps I would think that it's absolutely kind of. It's sort of the gearbox that's that's turning at the center of the data on one hand, the content and elements, the assets, the offer's on the other that allows for ultimately the coalescing of those things and then the delivery of an experience worth having. So that may have been like a two dollar answer Teo Two Cent question. But really, I feel like that's sort of the component pieces that we're seeing at play and sort of adobes motivation. And going into that space that came out where we're >> to Dhobi sounded a couple weeks ago. I can't keep track of things. Couple weeks go on Guy found it really interesting, especially with adobes roots really in the content generation side, right, all the way back to the creatives and the creators of that great content. And now to be a Liza sophistication of the tools to a B tests. I think best buy was on stage and they did four million or forty million customized email. So now you know, take this great creative A be tested to the degree again using the data and the contacts and the in the knowledge of what those customers are all about. And now it seems like the magenta piece is kind of the icing on the cake. Teo actually have the ability to get the transaction. Associate it with all this other process. Teo, bring the cash register, if you will. >> You're absolutely right. You're absolutely right. Adobe. When we when we executed sort of what we announced our intent to to acquire, we were talking about How does it'LL be? Facilitator? Help every experience become shop a ble and every moment personal And really that was That was a claim we couldn't make without without the magenta piece. So it is absolutely, um it's a hand in glove relationship. And now, especially as we've all evolved as consumers, I mean to imagine that we would be subscribing to socks or that we could one click purchase just about anything >> you need, the >> technology that can kind of keep pace with the expectations. And that's what it's all about because so many of those experiences that Adobe is intent on enabling our customers to present s >> so many of them culminate in a transaction >> of some sort. So the magenta is absolutely not only the icing on the cake, which I think is that it's a great metaphor, but it's also so integral right now, it's becoming like a fundamental or elemental part of what >> we're trying to accomplish, right. >> So delivering this comprehensive customer experience, managing our analytics, advertising, marketing, commerce the one thing that when you were kind of describing the core components of customer experience management again thinking is time. Because as consumers, we have so much choice. And if we meet friction at any point along the way, we're gonna churn it. We're gonna find somebody else who's gonna be able to deliver this product or service right. And unless in a frictionless way. So when you were talking about a I, for example, I was thinking comment on how that Khun B. Leverage to be able to facilitate that Justin Time shop, a ble experience that converts to a sale that is able to do so in a way that's personable, personalized to the customer experience and taking that inside to go. Right now, there's an action that Lisa just took. We've gotta offer this right now, >> right? Well, you know, that's one of things that I absolutely love about customer experience management. Sieck Sam Neill here issues the acronym. In >> a way, I >> just I kind of loved the absurdity of it, right. I mean, when you think of the scale to say something like, we're going to make every experience, shop a bowl and every moment personal, it's just, uh it's scope of that. And to imagine that that's possible is almost absurd. But when you introduce the advancements that we're seeing in artificial intelligence and machine learning now, it's literally going from the absurd of from the realm of science fiction into very real. It's and that's where What what adobes looking at, like, How can we literally take some sort of statement like we're going to personalize experiences at every across the customer journey? We're going to do it at scale and in real time you think you brought up the component of of real time and really, unless you're considering how we're going to meet the needs of the customer in the moment that they're expressing that need, then it's really moved. So it and it is absolutely artificial intelligence and machine learning that we're seeing sort of expressed now across the Adobe Experience cloud that are making that happen in in multiple ways. One of the ways would be simply by shortening that span between sort of the late genius that marketers are walking around in their heads and actual execution. So how can we kind of take the work some of the friction out of the work flows that allow them to translate their ideas in tow offers? And another place would be, How do we shorten the space between a signal that we get saying behavioral data that we see show up either in a nap or on a on a website, and then turn through all of the possibilities of what we could present? Apply algorithms to kind of determine what is the next best offer next best experience, and then present that >> in a way that actually >> feels, if not really time pretty close to it? And that would not be possible without without artificial intelligence at Adobe, our product in that space that we references Adobe Sensei's So you'LL hear us talk about Adobe Sense, say, and that's it's kind of the the umbrella that stretches around the different elements that I was talking about so >> interesting how just have the expectation game has changed and actually now being enabled by the technology under the covers because they used to be right. We made decisions based on a sampling of the data after the fact. Right now, the expectation is, I want to make a decision based on all the data or is close to all those I can get in near real time, real time, defined as enough time to do something about it, which is a completely different way to attack that problem and really change the expectation Gay. But that is the expectation game now from customers who are hoping that thing shows up. That's supposed to show up because it's really what I'm interested in now. And can't you figure that out based on all my activity? That's right. >> In fact, I was I was just having conversations with my children, and it kind of blows my mind there. They literally wonder why, when we order something on Amazon, it's not there, like within an hour to didn't Didn't we just buy that? And interestingly, in some in some markets now you're almost in a point where that's actually reality and So the fact that we've witnessed in such a short time frame this this kind of realization in this new reality, it is absolutely It's absolutely fascinating to observe it. We can only kind of blame and congratulate ourselves. Right is consumers for pushing these expectations, But now brands are doing everything they can to come Teo to keep up with. But I think one of the magical things that we're >> still we're still surprised and delighted on a regular >> basis. And that's one of the things that I love about Adobe and our ability to sort of Teo. Activate the things that that marketers and people who are responsible for customer spirit experience know that they want to dio. We're giving them tools now where it's actually not only a reality to respond in these incredibly short time frames, >> but do it in a way that could be >> super creative and and breakthrough or differentiate, which is a It's a It's a meaningful requirement for brands today to be able to do all of that stuff, but do it in a way that >> is unlike their peers, exactly like we were talking about before, when you have so much choices a consumer, especially for certain types of products that are commodities. If it's not in a way that's differentiated and unique, I'm going to go somewhere else. Where I could find that experience really kind of connects with me on whatever level, whatever the product of services be able to create that creative, unique experience. And we were talking with Jason about what was announced this morning with Adobe Sales Channel on the Adobe branded storefront and being able to give merchants even within Sorry, not Adobe Alice on been talking for hours, giving them the ability, say, within an Amazon marketplace to be elevator brand a little bit, make it a little bit more unique. So they had a little bit of an edge and maybe expressed some brand creativity within that platform. >> Right? I really do appreciate that element of of of what we're doing, having come from kind of an advertising background myself, where you know that you're the mental band with you get with anyone is so limited, and the opportunity to differentiate is you have to grab it when it presents itself. And so, in order to weigh risk to becomes like overly scientific about this indefinitely. There's there's so much science involved with it now. But we can't forget the art. We can't forget the opportunity to literally tio take that those even those minor elements. And sometimes it's the signals that we get that say someone is prepared, are interested in this type of experience. But then how do we make that experience not feel surgical, but rather actually impressive and emotionally even on? So that's one of things that I love about Adobe. We really do try and embrace push forward on the science aspect. But respect the fact that a lot of brand building and a lot of meaningful experiences that we have are absolutely also rooted in the art. So >> that's a great point. It's really helping customers kind of fine tune and dialled the art with the science. Your park marketing guy. What may be a favorite customer example that shows a customer that's really been able to leverage the data, the creativity to deliver differentiated brand millionaire, their customers, anything come to mind in particular? >> Well, certainly there's, you know, there's there's so many I I feel like for me, the operative when I really feel impacted by a brand. Sometimes it's when I break out of sort of the mundane or I get to go, wanna get I get to go on vacation with my family and I feel like, interestingly just going to AA remote locale. Sometimes it can either be magical or can be like, Ah, horror show, right? But the way brands like Marriott Starwood married Bon voy. Now the way that they're there, they're embracing the opportunity to sort of bring technology in a way that that feels very additives but almost transparent to where now you're actually you, Khun, Ifyou're based on your loyalty program and you have the right app on your phone, you can walk straight to the door and unlock the room. I mean, that's that's huge. And it takes something that could've like that might have been one of the bigger friction points, like standing in a line to check in, >> and it just makes it fluid. It makes it feel >> like, you know, this is the type of experience that I want tohave, but I'm just getting things done and things feel good and the opportunity for a brand to go in and sort of think about Where are those points where I might be introducing friction rather than feel good and being able to remove those and have technology do it in a transparent way? I think is really it's really impressive. >> It could be absolutely transformational. Absolutely for sure. It's such a good >> example of just kind of twisting the lens, you know, the check in process. Who would ever think we're not going to change the check in process? It's a check in process, but for some would actually you'LL Wait a minute, That is, that is, that is of their whole experience of their time with us. You're family for a couple three, four days. You know, that is a major for friction point. You're tired. Just got in from the airport, you know, the kids were hungry. You just want to drop your bags and then the stand in line. So So they used technology to redefine that little piece of that whole week that you're spending that property is really creative. Before you even get to the technology enablement to make it so >> or or take, for example, one of the most painful things that can happen and travel when you're on a flight that's delayed or cancelled. And then not only are you dealing then with just kind of the emotional duress of of having to re calculate everything, but then >> you have to stand in line forever. But now you >> can pull out your app and at your fingertips you have potential. You have the opportunity to be recognized as I'm this passenger. I have this sort of status. Here are our alternatives and being able to sort of take control or engage in that way that that that that leverages technology to again sort of remove friction and add solution. I >> just think >> we're really at the tip of the iceberg in the way that we're going to see this type of technology infusing into things that we feel are more pure experience than just marketing in campaigns. >> Exciting, exciting times. Adam, thank you so much for joining me on the Cuban sound implosion. Look forward to hearing lots of great things to come and really helping to drive his experiences with the art and the science. Indeed. Thank you for your time. >> Thank you. Thanks >> for Jeff. Rick. I'm Lisa Martin. Coming to you live from Imagine twenty nineteen at the Wynn Las Vegas. Thanks for watching
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube covering Hi, Welcome back to the Cube. Thank you for having me. Customer experience is critical to any product. It's great to be here, so and don't And I think the primary motivator for their evolution has been the customer customer that it is holistic, that respects the channels, now the capacity of at least my brain to manage in a singular Teo actually have the ability to get the transaction. And really that was That was a claim we couldn't make without without the magenta piece. because so many of those experiences that Adobe is intent on enabling our customers to present So the magenta is absolutely not only the icing on the cake, a ble experience that converts to a sale that is able to do so in a way that's personable, Sieck Sam Neill here issues the acronym. We're going to do it at scale and in real time you But that is the expectation game now from customers who are hoping that thing shows in this new reality, it is absolutely It's absolutely fascinating to observe And that's one of the things that I love about Adobe and our ability to sort is unlike their peers, exactly like we were talking about before, when you have so much choices We can't forget the opportunity to literally tio take customer that's really been able to leverage the data, the creativity to deliver And it takes something that could've like that might have been one of the bigger friction points, like standing in a line to check and it just makes it fluid. feel good and the opportunity for a brand to go in and sort of think about Where are those It's such a good technology to redefine that little piece of that whole week that you're spending or or take, for example, one of the most painful things that can happen and travel when you're on a flight that's But now you You have the opportunity to be recognized infusing into things that we feel are more pure experience than just marketing in campaigns. Look forward to hearing lots of great things to come and really helping to drive his experiences with the art and Thank you. Coming to you live from Imagine twenty nineteen at the Wynn Las Vegas.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jason | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam Justice | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adobe | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
forty million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Marriott Starwood | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Teo | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Adam Justis | PERSON | 0.98+ |
Adobes | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Teo | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
one click | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Dobie | PERSON | 0.95+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
half | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Bon voy | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
today | DATE | 0.93+ |
Adobe Sales Channel | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Experience Cloud | TITLE | 0.91+ |
this morning | DATE | 0.9+ |
an hour | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Couple weeks | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
Imagine | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
things | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Wynn | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
Khun | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
Adobe Imagine 2019 | TITLE | 0.85+ |
Los Vegas | LOCATION | 0.85+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
millions of times a day | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.83+ |
Time | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
Sam Neill | PERSON | 0.81+ |
lot of orange | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
Justin | PERSON | 0.79+ |
Cent | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
couple weeks ago | DATE | 0.78+ |
half the battle | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
Cuban | OTHER | 0.71+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
twenty | QUANTITY | 0.61+ |
Sieck | PERSON | 0.61+ |
Khun B. | PERSON | 0.61+ |
Sensei | TITLE | 0.58+ |
Dhobi | PERSON | 0.51+ |
Wind | LOCATION | 0.5+ |
Sense | TITLE | 0.47+ |
nineteen | ORGANIZATION | 0.45+ |
nineteen | DATE | 0.39+ |
Alice | TITLE | 0.38+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.21+ |
Gurmeet Mangat, GE Renewable Energy | Smartsheet ENGAGE'18
>> Live from Bellevue, Washington it's theCUBE. Covering Smartsheet Engage '18. Brought to you by Smartsheet. >> Welcome back to theCUBE. We are live at Smartsheet Engage 2018 in Bellevue, Washington. I am Lisa Martin with Jeff Frick, and we've had a great day talking with Smartsheet executives, analysts, users, and we're excited to welcome to theCube for the first time, Gurmeet Mangat, the site manager Wind Power Generation at GE Renewable Energy. Gurmeet, great to have you on the program. >> Thank you Lisa, thank you Jeff. I'm really happy to be here. >> So you're a user of Smartsheet, but you're also a renegade. So before we get into your renegade status, tell us a little bit about GE Renewable Energy and your role. You got a big role as site manager. What, 75 turbines across multiple locations? So let's talk about GE Renewable Energy and your role as site manager. >> Sure, no problem. So GE Renewable Energy. One of our missions statements is to unleash limitless energy. How we do that, we harness the power of the sun, the water, and the wind. So try to produce clean efficient energy to power countries, homes, businesses, whatever needs that powered energy. As a manager I manage, like you said three wind farms, three different customers. A very complex role to have. I'm coming right from not just operations, human resources, financials. So everything's required of someone like me to manage that business end to end. It's a challenge, at the same time I seek opportunity in a lot of what's going on and leveraging Smartsheet as one of the tools. It's something I've been using over the past year to optimize the business and run those turbines. >> So it's so funny because I would say GE turbine farms and GE engines are the most quoted, often referenced IOT devices in this next gen conversation about IOT and data and how much data they throw off of any other kind of product out there, and you're sitting right in the middle of it actually managing the real machines and managing the real data. >> Yeah, exactly. So I mean the, the machines themselves are highly automated. They're spinning out a lot of data and we've got great systems in place to manage that information. Make it transferrable, viewable to a lot of the people that need it. The opportunity is not necessarily in the equipment that GE manufactures but the back-end business that drives that manufacturing, that drives those services. That's where, again we leveraged Smartsheet over the last year to close a lot of data quality issues. We're ruling out and canceling a lot of the human error of the process steps that we're seeing in a lot of businesses today. We're really taking the initiative of managing our data, bringing us, making us actually competitive in the fourth industrial revolution. I mean I've had a strong believe that if you're not managing your data correctly today, you'll market yourself out of the business, you won't stay ahead of the game. So I think, like I was saying before the biggest opportunity right now is the back-end of the business. Smart GE does a great job at manufacturing and producing high quality products. I think there's huge opportunity in saving the back end and optimizing the process that runs that. >> When you say the back end, there's always a lot of conversation about you know going from reactive to predictive to prescriptive. Analytics, again everybody likes to talk about keeping the turbine up. Are you talking about those types of processes or is it more, you know how that energy is fed into the grid and more kind of the connection to the broader ecosystem, when you say back end? >> Let's talk about the proactive and reactive situation, 'cause that's really what we're trying to drive. >> Okay. >> There can be particular cases where a turbine could fail in the middle of winter, a high-wind season and the visibility's not great. So what we've done is we've taken Smartsheet. We've given our technicians a mobile application tool to collect data as they visit turbines. We're taking information within Smartsheet, we aggregate it, we quantify it, and now we're able to predict turbine behavior based on this information. A little bit faster than some of the tools that GE provides today. A perfect example is about a month ago we determined that a turbine needed a quarter of a million dollar repair before any GE tool told us that. That was simply because of giving our technicians a tool, which is a Smartsheet webform and telling us what happens everyday you visit that turbine. That goes into the background. We take the information, aggregate it into a dashboard viewings. That gives us a great visual control and visual aid of our business. >> That visibility-- >> I was going to say, is he collecting different data, or are you processing it in a different way with the tooling that you set up with Smartsheet that gives you that visibility? >> They are, so we are collecting different data. So GE gives us a lot of data on our turbine health efficiency, how it's operating. It might quantify the number of faults per megawatt hour and per (mumbles) it for us for example. But what we're creating with Smartsheet is we're creating our own organic KPIs I'll call them, some metrics that we are creating ourselves to try to drive different behavior. So when the techs go in, we talk about parts consumptions, for example. So if this part's been consumed 20 times over the last month, you've got to ask why. You know, why do you keep visiting this turbine to do that. So that visibility drives a different discussion now, so now we can engage with engineers with different type, different information. They might be able to say, "Okay, "you know what, you guys got some good data here. "We think you're right. "We should execute this repair." >> So, that example that you gave and give me the number again that working with Smartsheets your team was able to find a, what did you say, a $250 million? >> $250,000 repair. >> Thousand dollar repair. >> That's the cost of the repair, but it's a proactive repair versus reactive so now we're not facing a long wait time, finding a crane, bringing a crane on site, getting the paperwork in place to get the job done 'cause it's not an easy repair. >> But there's a very impressive snowball effect of the benefits back to the business. You've found it faster. You were able to get, you know the parts needed faster, repair it faster. Clearly that goes all the way back up the chain from a revenue perspective. >> Absolutely. >> But you, when I alluded to you earlier, this renegade status, you brought Smartsheet in from your previous job and you've said, "This has enabled us "to find something faster than "our brand of technology's product would have been "able to do." Talk to us about this conviction that you brought in and is it kind of becoming viral within GE Renewable Energy yet? >> Good question. It's becoming viral, a lot of people are listening now. So we've talked to GE digital VPs. I've talked to the ERP providers in Europe, what they're doing with GE. So we've essentially, I call it a success story. They're not going to adopt Smartsheet. They want to build their own enterprise solution but, the reason why I call it a success story is because I've changed the way that they are thinking today. >> That's huge. Cultural change? >> I've presented a solution to them. I've essentially told them, you need to give us something that works for us faster. If you do this, it gives managers capacity to improve your business, really develop people that are working underneath you, engage them, empower them, and move the business forward not on a typical five year plan that most businesses have in place. But it's a step change. >> Right, right. >> It takes you year over year and you're stepping every year to something new, and I think in today's day and age with how fast things are moving, you need that. >> And I'm curious to unpack a little bit on this example where you said you know, it's this failing part that was giving you a leading indicator that there was a bigger problem. So that was just kind of a different way to look at the solution, right? You're identifying kind of a stupid consumption pattern on a spare part that shouldn't happen as opposed to the core data that's coming off that machine and that's what gave you kind of the unique insights. Does that come from you? Does that come techs who are in the field and have kind of a sense of, "Maybe we should be looking at this, "maybe we should be looking at that." How do you start to empower people or where do some of these different kind of points of view that then can be backed up with data in the Smartsheet process come from? >> So, it's all techs. (clears throat) Coming into the job last year, I asked one of the techs, I said, "Why are you going to this turbine?" And the question why is such a powerful question to ask. They said, "We're going to fix this." So what happened last time? They had no idea. So I said, "There's no "information to support your visit today? "And you don't understand why you're going today." They said, "As a result of something that was not "done correctly before." So we fixed that part first. We started giving them the information upfront. We gave them a tool to collect the data. So now they are empowered to provide very direct feedback to myself as a manager and even to an engineering team, like in New York for example. Something technicians never felt empowered to do before. They are the driving factors for those data collection, the decision making. I definitely appreciate that by giving them feedback on a daily basis, that what you guys are doing is changing the way that we manage the business. It's a very driven culture change by the front line. It's not something that I'm pushing down. I'm asking them to help me push it upwards to the senior level. >> And they've got to love it. They've got to love thinking that they've actually got input as opposed to just being called to go out and fix things when it breaks. >> Exactly. They're driving their day. They can go to work in the morning. They can look at the whole personality of a turbine, what's outstanding, what was done last time and the conversations are very quick in the morning. It used to be a 7 o'clock startup. They're not driving out 'til eight, 8:30, nine o'clock by the time they get their stuff together. I mean we're averaging a seven am to about 7:30 departure now. >> So each person is saving 60 to 90 minutes everyday. >> Every day now departure. >> That's a big roll up. In fact, I was looking at some of the productivity stats that Smartsheet talks about on their website and they say an average per, individual user of Smartsheet will save about 300 hours a year. An organization can save up to 60,000 hours a year. >> I believe that. That's believable. I mean there's, just a technical aspect of managing a turbine. If we even talk about you know issuing a purchase order. Managing contractor labor, invoices. The tool that we're using today is a complete end to end P & L management tool. So it takes invoicing from subcontractors, labor. We are inventory tracking, we are tracking any health and safety issues. Everything from end to end, so it's really done a great job for us. >> That's all built within your Smartsheet? >> Correct. >> Wow. >> And it's all mobile, so. I mean I'm not at my site this week, but on a daily basis I have visibility to my business. You're talking about 70, 80 plus machines, that's over you know about a hundred million dollars in assets that have to be managed effectively, efficiently, and correctly. >> You have visibility into everyday from wherever you are? >> Exactly, yes. >> That's a huge transformation. So we talked about you being a renegade and other groups within GE on divisions that are curious about this. I'm curious, have you heard anything today that they have announced that excites you, or maybe was any of this part of a feedback that you provided, as we've heard all day Jeff that they're very responsive to customer feedback in terms of product innovation. Anything you're going to go back to the office and be excited, like the next generation or what's coming available soon? Is it going to enable me to do X-Y-Z now? >> That's a good question. So GE is a very tough company to change. There will be a lot of takeaways from this trip and when I go head back. After the last conversation I had with GE digital and the team, they are going to hire a new resource and set budget aside to help close the gaps that we've identified. So I think after this visit and some of the things I've learned throughout the conference and when I head back I'll only be able to identify a few more gaps that they need to fill, and I'll push that up to them probably in the next week when I get back there and hopefully they can appreciate that candid feedback and take that and run with it. >> But you were able to fund your existing project just out of your own discretionary funds? >> Exactly. I mean that's one of the benefits of Smartsheet. It costs really nothing to create something, and my job is to manage wind farms, so I've taken initiative to create, I call it a mini-ERP system using Smartsheet with an associate of mine, and it's an organic creation. It didn't take us, I mean to run three wind farms, I started last April, it probably took us less than six months to create a working system. That's awesome feedback for Smartsheet, their tools are very user-friendly. It's lightweight, it takes away the fear of coding that Excel gives to some people. If you're a new user of any application you can kind of walk into it and run with it. That's one of the reasons why we took it from nothing to something in such a short period of time. >> Wow. >> That's a ground swell in action that has some significant results. But you'd better be careful. I'm imagining your success is going to go so viral, you're going to have way more than 75 turbines and three wind farms >> That's possible. >> to manage. (laughs) >> There's been a recent acquisition and there's other sites around me that my boss is, or my directors said, "Hey, what are you doing next week?" >> Oh! (laughs) >> "Let's go visit this site for a few minutes." Okay, I know what you're getting at. >> Kind of a good problem to have, but thanks so much for stopping by and sharing with us what you're doing as a renegade. It seems pretty contagious. >> Appreciate it, thank you for having me. >> Thanks. >> Thanks. >> For Jeff Frick I'm Lisa Martin and you're watching theCUBE live from Smartsheet Engage 2018. Stick around, Jeff and I will be back to wrap up the show in just a minute. (digital music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Smartsheet. Gurmeet, great to have you on the program. I'm really happy to be here. So before we get into your renegade status, manage that business end to end. are the most quoted, often referenced IOT devices that GE manufactures but the back-end business to the broader ecosystem, when you say back end? Let's talk about the proactive and reactive and the visibility's not great. It might quantify the number of faults repair. getting the paperwork in place to get the job done Clearly that goes all the way back up the chain Talk to us about this conviction that you brought in I've talked to the ERP providers in Europe, That's huge. and move the business forward to something new, So that was just kind of a different way So now they are empowered to to go out and fix things when it breaks. and the conversations are very quick in the morning. productivity stats that Smartsheet talks about Everything from end to end, that have to be managed of a feedback that you provided, that they need to fill, that Excel gives to some people. That's a ground swell in action that has to manage. Okay, I know what you're good problem to have, but thanks so much and you're watching theCUBE live from
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
GE Renewable Energy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New York | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
60 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$250 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gurmeet Mangat | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$250,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
7 o'clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
Excel | TITLE | 0.99+ |
75 turbines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Thousand dollar | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
less than six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine o'clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
Bellevue, Washington | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
seven am | DATE | 0.99+ |
90 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GE Renewable Energy | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
each person | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last April | DATE | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
Smartsheet | TITLE | 0.98+ |
three wind farms | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
up to 60,000 hours a year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
about 300 hours a year | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Gurmeet | PERSON | 0.96+ |
about a hundred million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
80 plus machines | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
last month | DATE | 0.94+ |
about a month ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
a quarter of a million dollar | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
eight, | DATE | 0.91+ |
Wind Power Generation | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Smartsheet | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
more than 75 turbines | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
8:30 | DATE | 0.87+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
three different customers | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
GE digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
theCube | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
70 | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
about | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
minute | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
fourth industrial revolution | EVENT | 0.59+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.58+ |
Smartsheet Engage | TITLE | 0.56+ |
Alan Cohen, Illumio | Cube Conversation
(upbeat music) >> Welcome to this special CUBEConversation here in the Palo Alto CUBE studio. I'm John Furrier, the co-host, theCUBE co-founder of SiliconANGLE Media. In theCUBE we're here with Alan Cohen, CUBE alumni, joining us today for a special segment on the future of technology and the impact to society. Always good to get Alan's commentary, he's the Chief Commercial Officer for Illumio, industry veteran, has been through many waves of innovation and now more than ever, this next wave of technology and the democratization of the global world is upon us. We're seeing signals out there like cryptocurrency and blockchain and bitcoin to the disruption of industries from media and entertainment, biotech among others. Technology is not just a corner industry, it's now pervasive and it's having some significant impacts and you're seeing that in the news whether it's Facebook trying to figure out who they are from a data standpoint to across the board every company. Alan, great to see you. >> Always great to be here, I always feel like, I can't tell whether I'm at the big desk at ESPN or I've got the desk chair at CNBC, but that's what it's like being on theCUBE. >> Great to have you on extracting the signal noises, a ton of noise out there, but one of things of the most important stories that we're tracking is, that's becoming very obvious, and you're seeing it everywhere from Meed to all aspects of technology. Is the impact of technology to people in society, okay you're seeing the election, we all know what that is, that's now a front and center in the big global conversation, the Russian's role of hacking, the weaponizing of data, Facebook's taking huge brand hits on that, to emerging startups, and the startup game that we're used to in Silicon Valley is changing. Just the dynamics, I mean cryptocurrency raises billions of dollars but yet (laughs) something like 10, 20% of it's been hacked and stolen. It's a really wild west kind of environment. >> Well it's a very different environment. John, you and I have been in the technology industry certainly for a whole bunch of lines under our eyes over the years have gone there. My friend Tom Friedman has this phrase that he says, "Everybody's connected and nobody's in control," so the difference is that, as you just said, the tech industry is not a separate industry. The tech industry is in every product and service. Cryptocurrency is like, the concept of that money is just code. You know, our products and services are just code, it raises a couple of really core issues. Like for us on the security point of view, if I don't trust people with the products they're selling me, that I feel like they're going to be hacked, including my personal data, so your product now includes my personal information, that's a real problem because that could actually melt down commerce in a real way. Obviously the election is if I don't trust the social systems around it, so I think we're all at an, and I'd like to say world is still kind of like iRobot moment, and if you remember iRobot, it's like, people build all these robots to serve humankind and then one day the robots wake up and they go, "We have our own point of view on how things are going to work" and they take over, and I think whether it's the debate about AI, whether cryptocurrency's good or bad, or more importantly, the products and services I use, which are now all digitally connected to me, whether I trust them or not is an issue that I think everyone in our industry has to take a step back because without that trust, a lot of these systems are going to stop growing. >> Chaos is an opportunity, I think that's been quoted many times, a variety-- >> You sound like Jeff Goldblum in like Jurassic Park, yeah. (laughing) >> So chaos is upon us, but this is an opportunity. The winds are shifting, and that's an opportunity for entrepreneurs. The technology industry has to start working for us but we've got to be mindful of these blind spots and the blind spots are technology for good not necessarily just for profits, so that also is a big story right now. We see things like AI for good, Intel has been doing a lot of work on that area, and you see stars dedicated to societal impact, then young millennials, you see the demographic shift where they want to work on stuff that empowers people and changes society so a whole kind of new generation revolution and kind of hippie moment, if you look at the 60s, what the 60s were, right? >> Well there's people out in the street protesting, right? There were a couple of million women out in the street this weekend, so we are in that kind of moment again, people are not happy with things. >> And I believe this is a signal of a renaissance, a change, a sea change at enormous levels, so I want to get your thoughts on this. As technology goes out in mainstream, certainly from a security standpoint, your business Illumio is in that now where there's not a lot of control, just like you were mentioning before we came on that all the spends happening but no one has more than 4% market share. These are dynamics and this is not just within one vertical. What's your take on this, how do you view this sea change that's upon us, this tech revolution? >> Well, you know, think about it. You and I grew up in the era where clients server took over from main frame, right? So remember there was this big company called IBM and they owned a lot of the industry, and then it blew up for client server and then there were thousands of companies and it consolidated its way down, but when those thousands of new companies, like you didn't know what was going to be Apollo and what was going to be Oracle right? Like you didn't know how that was going to work out, there was a lot of change and a lot of uncertainty. I think now we're seeing this on a scale like that's 10x of this that there's so much innovation and there's so much connectedness going on very rapidly, but no one is in control. In the security market, you know, what's happening in our world is like, people said, okay I have to reestablish control over my data, I've lost that control, and I've lost it for good reasons, meaning I've evolved to the cloud, I've evolved to the app economy, I've done all of these things, and I've lost it for bad reasons because like am I, like I'm not really running my data center the way I should. We're in the beginning of a move in of people kind of reasserting that control, but it's very hard to put the genie back in the bottle because the world itself is so much more dynamic and more distributed. >> It's interesting, I've been studying communities and online communities for over a decade in terms of dynamics. You know, from the infrastructural level, how packets move to a human interaction. It's interesting, you mentioned that we're all connected and no one's in control, but you now see a ground swell of organic self-forming networks where communities are starting to work together. You kind of think about the analog world when we grew up without computers and networks, you kind of knew everyone, you knew your neighbor, you knew who the town loony was, you kind of knew things and people watch each other's kids and parents sat from the porch, let the kid play, that's the way that I grew up, but it was still chaotic but yet somewhat controlled by the group. So I got to ask you, when you see things like cryptocurrency, things like KYC, know your customer, anti money laundering, which is, you know these are policy based things, but we're in a world now where, you know, people don't know who their neighbors are. You're starting to see a dynamic where people are-- >> Put the phone down. >> Asserting themselves to know their neighbor, to know their customer, to have a connected tissue with context and so your trust and reputation become super important. >> Well I think people are really, so like every time there is a shift in technology, there's scary stuff. There's the fuddy-duddy moment where people are saying, "Oh we can't use that," or "I don't know that," and you know, clearly we're in this kind of new kam-ree and explosion of this cloud mobile blah blah blah type of computing thing and ... Blah blah blah is always a good intersection when you don't have a term. Then things form around it, and just as you said, so if you think about 25 years ago, right, people created The WELL and there was community writing first bulletin boards and like now we have Facebook and you go through a couple of generations and for a while, things feel out of control and then it reforms. I personally am an optimist. Ultimately I believe in the inherent goodness of people, but inherent goodness leaves you open and then, you know, could be manipulated, and people figure these things out. Whether it's cryptocurrency or AI, they are really exciting technologies that don't have any ground rules, right? What's going to happen I believe is that people are going to reestablish ground rules, they're going to figure out some of the core issues, and some of these things may make it, and some of these things may not make it. Like cryptocurrency, like I don't know whether it makes it or not, but certainly the blockchain as a technology we're going to be incorporating in what we do, and maybe the blockchain replaces VPNs and last generation's way of protecting zeros and ones. If AI is figuring out how to read an MRI in five minutes, it's a good thing, and if the AI is teaching you how to exclude old folks for me finding jobs, it's a bad thing. I think as technology forms, there's always Spectre and 007, right? There's always good and bad sides and you know, I think if you believe-- >> I'm with you on that. I think value shifts and I think ultimately it's like however you want to look at it will shift to something, value activity will be somewhere else. Behind me in the bookshelf is a book called The World is Flat and you're quoted in it a lot as a futurist because you have inherently that kind of view, well that's not what you do for a living, but you're kind of in an opt-- >> Alan: Marketing, futurist, kind of same thing. >> Thomas Friedman, the book, that was a great book and at that time, it was game changing. If you take that premise into today where we are living in a flat world and look at cryptocurrency, and then over with the geo political landscape, I mean I just can't see why the Federal Reserve wouldn't reign in this cryptocurrency because if Japan's going to control a bunch of, or China, it's going to be some interesting conversations. I mean I would be like all over that if I was in the Federal Reserve. >> I think people-- Look, cryptocurrency's really interesting and I think people a little over-rotated. If you look at the amount of GDP that's invested in cryptocurrency, it's like, I don't know, there might've been, you know 20 years ago the same amount involved invested in Beanie Babies, right? I mean things show up for a while and the question is is it sustainable over time? Now I'm trained as an economist, you and I have had this conversation, so I don't know how you have a series of monetary without kind of governmental backing, I just don't understand. But I do understand that people find all kinds of interesting ways to trade, and if it's an exchange, like I mean what's the difference between gold and cryptocurrency? Somebody has ascribed a value to something that really has no efficacy outside of its usage. Yeah I mean you can make a filling or bracelets out of gold but it doesn't really mean anything except people agree to a unit of value. If people do that with cryptocurrency, it does have the ability to become a real currency. >> I want to pick your perspective on this being an economist, this is is the hottest area of cryptocurrency, it's also known as token economics, is a concept. >> Alan: Token economics. >> You know that's an area that theCUBE, with CUBE coins, experimenting with tokens. Tokens technically are used for things in mobile and whatnot but having a token as a utility in a network is kind of the whole concept, so the big trend that we're seeing and no one's really talking about this yet is instead of having a CTO, Chief Technology Officer, they're looking for a CEO, a Chief Economist Officer, because what you're seeing with the MVP economy we're living in and this gamification which became growth hack which didn't really help users, the notion of decentralized applications and token economics can open the door for some innovation around value and it's an economic problem, how you have a fiscal policy of your token, there's a monetary policy, what's it tied to? A product and a technology, so you now have a now a new, twisted, intertwined mechanism. >> Well you have it as part of this explosion, right? We're at a period of time, it feels like there's a great amount of uncertainly because everything's, you know, there's a lot of different forces and not everybody's in control of them, and you know, it's interesting. Google has this architecture, they call it BeyondCorp, where the concept is like networks are not trusted so I will just put my trust in this device, Duo Security's a great example of a company that's built a technology, a security technology around it which is completely antithetical to everything we know about networks and security. They're saying everything's the internet, I'll just protect the device that it's on. It's a kind of perfect architecture for a world like where nobody is in charge, so just isolate those, buy this, what is a device? It's a token too, it's a person, your iPhone's your personal token. Then over time, systems will form around it. I think we just have to, we always have to learn how to function in a different type of economy. I mean democracy was a new economy 250 years ago that kind of screwed around with most of the world, and a lot of people didn't think it would make it, in fact we went through two World War wars that it was a little on the edge whether democracy was going to make it and it seems to have done okay, like it was pretty good IPO to buy into. You know, in 1776. But it's always got risks and struggles with it. I think if, ultimately it comes together, it's whether a large group of people can find a way to function socially, economically, and with their personal safety in these systems. >> You bring up a great point, so I want to go to the next level in this conversation which is around-- >> Alan: You've got the wrong guy if you're going to the next level because I just tapped out. >> No, no, no we'll get you there. It's my job to get you there. The question is that everyone always wants to look at, whether it's someone looking at the industry or actors inside the industries across the board, mainly the tech and we'll talk about tech, is the question of are we innovating? You brought up some interesting nuances that we talk about with token economics. I mean Steve Jobs had the classic presentation where he had street signs, technology meets liberal arts. That's a mental image that people who know Steve Jobs, know Apple, was a key positioning point for Apple at that time which was let's make computers and technology connect with society, liberal arts. But we were just talking about is the business impact of technology, the economics, and that's just not like just some hand waving, making technology integrate with business. You're in the security business, There are some gamification technology, gamification that's business built into the products. So the question is, if we have the integration of business, technology, economics, policy, society rolling into the product definitions of innovation, does that change the lens and the aperture of what innovation is? >> I think it does, right? The IT industry's somewhere between three and four trillion dollars depends on how it counts in. It grows pretty slowly, it grows by a low single digit. That tells me as composite, like is that, that slow growth is a structural signal about how consumers of technology think in a macro sense. On a micro sense, things shift very rapidly, right? New platforms show up, new applications show up, all kinds of things show up. What I don't think we have done yet, to your point, is in this new integrated world, the role of technology is not just technology anymore. I don't think, you know you said you need Chief Economical Officer, what about Chief Political Officer? What about a Chief Social Officer? How many heads of HR make decisions about the insertion of systems into their business? And that's what this kind of iRobot concept is in my mind which is that you know, we are exceeding control of things that used to be done by human beings to systems and when you see control, the social mores, the political mores, the cultural mores, and the human emotional mores have to move with it. We don't tend to think about things like that. We're like, "I win and my competitors lose." Like technology used to be much more of a zero sum, my tech's better than yours. But the question is not just is my tech better than yours, is my customer better off in their industry for the consumption of my technology of inserting it into their offering or their service? You know what, that is probably going to be the next area of study. The other thing that's very important in whether, any of you have read Peter Thiel's book Zero to One, the nature of competition technology used to feel like a flat playing field and now the other thing that's rising is do you have super winners? And then what is the power of the super winners? So you mentioned whether it's Facebook or Google or Amazon or you know, or Microsoft, the FANG companies right? Their roles are so much more significant now than the Four Horsemen of the Nasdaq were in 2000 when you had Intel and Cisco and Oracle and Saht-in it's a different game. >> You're seeing that now. That's a good point, so you're reinforcing kind of this notion that the super players if you will are having an impact, you're mentioning the confluence of these new sectors, you know, government, policy, social are new areas. The question is, this sounds like a strategic imperative for the industry, and we're early so it's not like there's a silver bullet or is there, it doesn't sound like there, so to me that's not really in place yet, I mean. >> Oh no. We're not even in alpha. We have demo code for the new economy and we're trying to get the new model funded. >> John: That's the demo version, not the real version. It's the classic joke. >> Yeah this not the alpha or the beta version that like you're going to go launch it. If people think they're launching it, I think it's a little preliminary and you know, it's not just financial investment, it's like do I buy in? I'll tell you something that's really interesting. I've been visiting a bunch of our customers lately and the biggest change I'd say in the last two years is they now have to prove to their customers they're going to be good custodians of their data. Think about that, like you could go to any digital commerce you do, any website you use and you give them basically the ticket to the Furrier family privacy, you do, but you don't spend a lot of time questioning whether they're really going to protect your data. That has changed. And it's really changing in B2B and in government organizations. >> The role of data to us is regulation, GDPR in Europe, but this is a whole new dynamic. >> It's not just my data because I'm worried about my credit card getting hacked, I'm worried about my identity. Like am I going to show up as a meme in some social media feed that's substituted for the news? I don't want to use the FN word, but you know what I mean? It is a really brave new world. It's like a hyper-democracy and a hyper-risky state at the same time. >> We're living in an area of massive pioneering, new grounds, this is new territory so there's a lot of strategic imperatives that are yet not defined. So now let's take it to how people compete. We were talking before we came on camera, you mentioned the word we're in an MVP economy, minimum viable product concept, and you're seeing that being a standard operating procedure for essentially de-risking this challenge. The old way of you know, build it, ship it, will it work? We're seeing the impact from Hollywood to big tech companies to every industry. >> Well you've got a coffee mug for a company that does both. Amazon does MVP in entertainment, like we'll create one pilot and see if it goes as opposed to ordering a season for 17 million dollars to hey, let's try this feature and put it out on AWS. What's interesting is I don't think we've completely tilted but the question is will buyers of technology, of entertainment products, of any product start to say, "I'll try it." You know like, look, I've done four startups and I always know there's somebody I can go to get and try my early product. There are people that just have an appetite, right? The Jeffrey Moores, early adapter, all the way to the left of the-- >> They'll buy anything new. >> They'll try it, they're interested, they have the time and the resources, or they're just intellectually curious. But it was always a very small group of people in the IT industry. What I think that the MVP economy is starting to do is look, I Kickstarted my wallet. I don't know if I'm the only person who bought that skinny little wallet on Kickstarter, it doesn't matter to me, it had appeal. >> What's the impact of the MVP economy? Is it going to change to the competitive landscape like Peter Thiel was suggesting? Does it change the economics? Does it change the makeup of the team? All of the above? What's your thoughts on how this is going to impact? Certainly the encumbrance will seem to be impacted or not. >> I think two things happen. One, it attacks the structural way markets work. If you go back to classical economics, land, labor, and capital, and people who own those assets, now you add information as a fourth. If those guys were around now they would say that would be the fourth core asset, production, I'm sorry, means of production is the term. The people who can dominate that would dominate a market. Now that that's flattened out, you know, I think it pushes against the traditional structures and it allows new giants to kind of show up overnight. I mean the e-commerce market is rife with companies that have, like look at Stich Fix. A company driven by AI, fashions, tries to figure out what you like, sends it to you every month, just had a monster IPO. We invented, by the way the Spiegal Catalog, except like with a personal assistant and you know, it's changed that in just a short number of years. I think two things happen. One is you'll get new potential giants but certainly new players in the market quickly. Two, it'll force a change in the business model of every company. If you're in a cab in any city in the world, I'm not saying whether the app works there or not, Uber and Lyft has forced every cab company to show you here's the app to call the cab. They haven't quite caught up to the rest of the experience. What I think happens is ultimately, the larger players in an industry have to accommodate that model. For people like me, people who build companies or large technology companies, we may have to start thinking about MVPing of features early on, working with a small group, which is a little what the beta process is but now think about it as a commercial process. Nobody does it, but I bet sure a lot of people will be doing it in five years. >> I want to get your take on that approach because you're talking about really disrupting, re-imagining industry, the Spiegal catalog now becomes digital with technology, so the role of technology in business, we kind of talked about the intertwine of that and its nuance, it's going to get better in my opinion. But specifically the IT, the information technology industry is being disrupted. Used to be like a department, and the IT department will give you your phone on your desk, your PC on your desk or whatever, now that's being shattered and everyone that's participating in that IT industry is evolving. What's your take on the IT industry's disruption? >> Well look, it started 20 years ago when Marc Benioff and Salesforce decided to sell the sales forces instead of IT people, right? They went around to the end buyer. I don't think it's a new trend, I think a lot of technology leaders now figure out how to go to the business buyer directly and make their pitch and interestingly enough, the business buyer, if the IT team doesn't get on board, will do that. >> John: Because of cloud computing and ... >> Because of everything. The modern analog I think in our world is that the developers are increasingly in control. Like my friend Martin Casado up in Andreessen talks about this a lot. The traditional model on our industry is you build a product, you launch it, you launch your company, you work with the traditional analyst firms, you try to get a little bit of halo, you get customer references, those are the things you do and there was a very wall structured, for example, enterprise buying cycle. >> And playbook. >> Playbook, and there's the challenger sale and there's Jeffrey Moore and there's like seeing God. You've got your textbooks on how it's been done. As everything turns into code, the people who work with code for a living increasingly become the front end of your cycle and if you can get to them, that changes. Like I mean think about like, you know, Tom wrote about this actually in The World is Flat, like Linux started as a patchy. It didn't start with the IT department, it started with developers and there was the Linux foundation and now Linux is everything. >> There's a big enemy called the big mini computer, and not operating systems and work stations. >> Wiped out whole parts of Boston and other parts of the world, right? >> Exactly, that's why I moved out here. >> You filed client's server out here. >> I filed a smell of innovation. No but this is interesting because this location of industries is happening, so with that, so they also on the analog, so Martin's at Andreessen, so we'll do a little VC poke there at the VCs because we love them of course, they're being dislocated-- >> I don't (mumbles) my investors. >> Well no, their playbook is being challenged. Here's an example, go big or go home investment thesis seems not to be working. Where if you get too much cash on the front end, with the MVP economy we were just riffing on and with the big super powers, the Amazons and the Googles, you can't just go big or go home, you're going to be going home more than going big. >> I think they know that. I mean Dee-nuh Suss-man who's I think Chief Investment Officer at Nasdaq has a very well known talking line that there are half as many public companies as there were 10 years ago, so the exit scenario for our industry is a little bit different. We now have things like acqui-hires, right we have other models for monetization, but I think what the flip side of it is, we're in the-- >> Adapt or die because the value will shift. Liquidity's changing, which acqui-hires-- >> I think the investment community gets it completely and they spend a lot more time with the developer mindset. In fact I think there's been a doubling down focus on technical founders versus business founders for companies for just that reason because as everything turns to code, you got to hang out with the code community. I think there are actually-- >> You think there'll be more doubling down on technical founders? You do, okay. >> Yeah I think because that is ultimately the shift. There are business model shifts, but it's, you know, I mean like Uber was a business model shift, I mean the technology was the iPhone and GPS and they wrote an app for it, but it was a business model shift, so it can be a business model shift. >> And then scale. >> And then scale and then all of those other things. But I think if you don't think about developers when you're in our, and it's like we built Illumio because a developer could take the product and get started. I mean you can, developers actually can write security policy with our product because there's a class of customers, where as not everyone where that matters. There's other people where the security team is in charge or the infrastructure team is in charge but I think everything is based on zeros and ones and everything is based on code and if you're not sensitive to how code gets bought, consumed, I mean there's a GitHub economy which is I don't even have to write the code, I'll go look at your code and maybe use pieces of it, which has always been around. >> Software disruption is clear. Cloud computing is scale. Agile is fast, and with de-risking capabilities, but the craft is coming back and some will argue, we've talked about on theCUBE before is that, you know, the craftsmanship of software is moving to up the stack in every industry, so-- >> I think it's more like a sports league. I love the NBA, right? In the old days, your professional team, you'd scout people in college. Now they used to scout them in high school, now they're scouting kids in middle school. >> (laughs) That's sad. >> Well what it says is that you have to-- >> How can you tell? >> You know but they can, right? I think you know, your point about it craft, you're going to start tracking developers as they go through their career and invest and bet on them. >> Don't reveal our secrets to theCUBE. We have scouts everywhere, be careful out there. (laughs) >> But think about that, imagine it's like there's such a core focus on hiring from college, but we had an intern from high school two years ago. We hire freshman. >> Okay so let's go, I want to do a whole segment on this but I want to just get this point because we're both sports fans and we can riff on sports all day long. >> I'm just not getting the chance >> And the greatness of Tom Brady >> to talk about the Patriots. >> And Tom Brady's gotten his sixth finger attached to his hands for his sixth ring coming up. No but this is interesting. Sports is highly data driven. >> Alan: Yep. >> Okay and so what you're getting at here, with an MVP economy, token economics is more of a signal, not yet mainstream, but you can almost go there and think okay data driven gives you more accuracy so if you can bring data driven to the tech world, that's kind of an interesting point. What's your thoughts on that? >> Yeah I mean look, I think you have to track everything. You have to follow things, and by the way, we have great tools now, you can track people through LinkedIn. There's all kinds of vehicles to tracking individuals, you track products, you track everything, and you know look, we were talking about this before we went on the show right, people make decisions based on analytics increasingly. Now the craft part is what's interesting and I'm not the complete expert, I'm on the business side, I'm not an engineer by training, but look a lot of people understand a great developer is better than five bad developers. >> Well Mark Andris' 10x is a classic example of that. >> There's clearly a star system involved, so if I think in middle school or in high school, you're going to be a good developer, and I'm going to track your career through college and I'm going to try to figure out how to attach. That's why we started hiring freshmen. >> Well my good friend Dave Girouard started a company that does that, will fund the college education for people that they want to bet on. >> Sure, they're just taking an option in them. >> Yeah, option on their earnings. Exactly. >> They are. >> It sounds like token economics to me. (laughs) >> You know you can sell anything. We are in that economy, you can sell those pieces. The good news is I think it can be a great flattener, meaning that it can move things back more to a meritocracy because if I'm tracking people in high school, I'm not worrying whether they're going to go to Stanford or Harvard or Northwestern, right? I'm going to track their abilities in an era and it's interesting, speaking about craft, you know, what are internships? They're apprenticeships. I mean it is a little bit like a craft, right? Because you're basically apprenticing somebody for a future payout for them coming to work for you and being skilled because they don't know anything when they come and work, I shouldn't say that, they actually know a lot of things. >> Alan, great to have you on theCUBE as always, great to come in and get the update. We'll certainly do more but I'd like to do a segment on you on the startup scene and sort of the venture capital dynamics, we were tracking that as well, we've been putting a lot of content out there. We believe Silicon Valley's a great place. This mission's out there, we've been addressing them, but we really want to point the camera this year at some of the great stuff, so we're looking forward to having you come back in. My final question for you is a personal one. I love having these conversations because we can look back and also look forward. You do a lot of mentoring and you're also helping a lot of folks in the industry within just your realm but also startups and peers. What's your advice these days? Because there's a lot of things, we just kind of talked a lot of it. When people come to you for advice and say, "Alan, I got a career change," or "I'm looking at this new opportunity," or "Hey, I want to start a company," or "I started a company," how is your mentoring and your advisory roles going on these days? Can you share things that you're advising? Key points that people should be aware of. >> Well look, ultimately ... I never really thought about it, you just asked the question so, ultimately, I think to me it comes down to own your own fate. What it means is like do something that you're really passionate about, do something that's going to be unique. Don't be the 15th in any category. Jack Welch taught us a long time ago that the number one player in a market gets 70% of the economic value, so you don't want to play for sixth place. It's like Ricky Bobby said, if you're not first, you're last. (John chuckles) I mean you can't always be first, but you should play for that. I think for a lot of companies now, I think they have to make sure that, and people participating, make sure that you're not playing the old playbook, you're not fighting yesterday's battle. Rhett Butler in Gone With the Wind said, "There's a lot of money in building up an empire, "and there's even more money in tearing it down." There are people who enter markets to basically punish encumbrance, take share because of innovation, but I think the really inspirational is you know, look forward five years and find a practical but aggressive path to being part of that side of history. >> So are we building up or are we taking down? I mean it seems to me, if I'm not-- >> You're always doing both. The ocean is always fighting the mountains, right? That is the course of, right? And then new mountains come up and the water goes someplace else. We are taking down parts of the client server industry, the stack that you and I built a lot of our personal career of it, but we're building this new cloud and mobile stack at the same time. And you're point is we're building a new currency stack and we're going to have to build a new privacy stack. It's never, the greatest thing about our industry is there's always something to do. >> How has the environment of social media, things out there, we're theCUBE, we do our thing with events, and just in general, change the growth plans for individuals if you were, could speak to your 23 year old self right now, knowing what you know-- >> Oh I have one piece of advice I give everybody. Take as much risk as humanly possible in your career earlier on. There's a lot of people that have worked with me or worked for me over the years, you know people when they get into their 40s and they go, "I'm thinking about doing a startup," I go, "You know when you got two kids in college "and you're trying to fund your 401K, "working for less cash and more equity may not be "the most comfortable conversation in your household." It didn't work well in my household. I mean I'm like Benjamin Button. I started in big companies, I'm going to smaller companies. Some day it's just going to be me and a dog and one other guy. >> You went the wrong way. >> Yeah I went the wrong way and I took all the risk later. Now I was lucky in part that the transition worked. When I see younger folks, it's always like, do the riskiest thing humanly possible because the penalty is really small. You have to find a job in a year, right? But you know, you don't have the mortgage, and you don't have the kids to support. I think people have to build an arc around their careers that's suitable with their risk profile. Like maybe you don't buy into bitcoin at 19,000. Could be wrong, could be 50,000 sometime, but you know it's kind of 11 now and it's like-- >> Yeah don't go all in on 19, maybe take a little bit in. It's the play and run-- >> Dollar cost averaging over the years, that's my best fidelity advice. I think that's what's really important for people. >> What about the 45 year old executive out there, male or female obviously, the challenges of ageism? We're in economy, a gig economy, whatever you want to call, MVP economics, token economics, this is a new thing. Your advice to someone who's 45 who just says "Hey you're too old for our little hot startup." What should they do? >> Well being on the other side of that history I understand it firsthand. I think that you have an incumbent role in your career to constantly re-educate yourself. If you show up, whether you're a 25, 35, 45, 55, or 65, I hope I'm not working when I'm 75, but you never know right? (mumbles) >> You'll never stop working, that's my prediction. >> But you know have you mastered the new skills? Have you reinvented yourself along the way? I feel like I have a responsibility to feed the common household. My favorite part of my LinkedIn profile, it says, "Obedient worker bee at the Cohen household," because when I go home, I'm not in charge. I've always felt that it's up to me to make sure I'm not going to be irrelevant. That to me is, you know, that to me, I don't worry about ageism, I worry about did I-- >> John: Relevance. >> Yeah did I make myself self-obsolescent? I think if you're going to look at your career and you haven't looked at your career in 15 years and you're trying to do something, you may be starting from a deficit. So the question, what can I do? Before I make that jump, can I get involved, can I advise some small companies? Could I work part time and on the weekends and do some things so that when you finally make that transition, you have something to offer and you're relevant in the dialogue. I think that's, you know, nobody trains you, right? We're not good as an industry-- >> Having a good community, self-learning, growth mindset, always be relevant is not a bad strategy. >> Yeah, I mean because I find increasingly, I see people of all ages in companies. There is ageism, there is no doubt. There's financial ageism and then there's kind of psychological bias ageism, but if you keep yourself relevant and you are the up to speed in your thing, people will beat a path to want to work for you because there's still a skill gap in our industry-- >> And that's the key. >> Yeah, make sure that you're on the right side of that skill gap, and you will always have something to offer to people. >> Alan, great to have you come in the studio, great to see you, thanks for the commentary. It's a special CUBEConversation, we're talking about the future of technology impact the society and a range of topics that are emerging, we're on a pioneering, new generational shift and theCUBE is obviously covering the most important stories in Silicon Valley from figuring out what fake news is to impact to the humans around the world and again, we're doing our part to cover it. Alan Cohen, CUBEConversation, I'm John Furrier, thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
the future of technology and the impact to society. or I've got the desk chair at CNBC, Is the impact of technology to people in society, so the difference is that, as you just said, You sound like Jeff Goldblum in like Jurassic Park, yeah. and the blind spots are technology for good out in the street this weekend, just like you were mentioning before we came on that In the security market, you know, and parents sat from the porch, let the kid play, and so your trust and reputation become super important. I think if you believe-- I'm with you on that. Thomas Friedman, the book, that was a great book it does have the ability to become a real currency. I want to pick your perspective on this being an economist, is kind of the whole concept, and you know, it's interesting. Alan: You've got the wrong guy if you're going It's my job to get you there. and the human emotional mores have to move with it. kind of this notion that the super players if you will We have demo code for the new economy It's the classic joke. and the biggest change I'd say in the last two years is The role of data to us I don't want to use the FN word, but you know what I mean? The old way of you know, build it, ship it, will it work? and I always know there's somebody I can go to get I don't know if I'm the only person Does it change the makeup of the team? Uber and Lyft has forced every cab company to show you will give you your phone on your desk, and interestingly enough, the business buyer, is that the developers are increasingly in control. and if you can get to them, that changes. There's a big enemy called the big mini computer, of industries is happening, so with that, I don't (mumbles) Where if you get too much cash on the front end, I think they know that. Adapt or die because the value will shift. you got to hang out with the code community. You think there'll be more doubling down I mean the technology was the iPhone and GPS But I think if you don't think about developers the craftsmanship of software is moving to up the stack I love the NBA, right? I think you know, your point about it craft, Don't reveal our secrets to theCUBE. But think about that, imagine it's like but I want to just get this point attached to his hands for his sixth ring coming up. so if you can bring data driven to the tech world, and I'm not the complete expert, and I'm going to track your career through college for people that they want to bet on. Yeah, option on their earnings. It sounds like token economics to me. to work for you and being skilled When people come to you for advice and say, I think to me it comes down to own your own fate. the stack that you and I built a lot of our I go, "You know when you got two kids in college and you don't have the kids to support. It's the play and run-- Dollar cost averaging over the years, male or female obviously, the challenges of ageism? I think that you have an incumbent role in your career that's my prediction. That to me is, you know, I think that's, you know, nobody trains you, right? Having a good community, self-learning, growth mindset, and you are the up to speed in your thing, of that skill gap, and you will always have Alan, great to have you come in the studio,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Tom Friedman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Martin Casado | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alan Cohen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Goldblum | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Jobs | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Girouard | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Thomas Friedman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Tom Brady | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two kids | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
70% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Jack Welch | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Federal Reserve | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Jurassic Park | TITLE | 0.99+ |
50,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Peter Thiel | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazons | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey Moore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
17 million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Lyft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15th | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
19,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rhett Butler | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Nasdaq | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
1776 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
CNBC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
sixth ring | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Mark Andris' | PERSON | 0.99+ |
45 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
75 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10x | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ricky Bobby | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
65 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
fourth | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
The World is Flat | TITLE | 0.99+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
iPhone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
sixth finger | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Patriots | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
25 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
19 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Googles | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stich Fix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Gone With the Wind | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.99+ |
55 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
five bad developers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Apollo | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Xavier Poisson & Eugene Viskovic | HPE Discover 2017 Madrid
(upbeat music) >> Live from Madrid, Spain, it's theCUBE. Covering HPE Discover Madrid 2017, brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. >> We're back in Madrid, everybody. This is theCUBE, the leader in live tech coverage. My name is Dave Vellante. I'm here with my co-host Peter Burris. And many-time Cube guest Xavier Poisson is back. He's the vice president of Cloud28+ and service providers worldwide for Hewlett Packard Enterprise. And he's joined by Eugene Viskovic, who is the chief business officer at Veon, a Cloud28+ partner. Gentlemen, welcome to theCUBE. Welcome back, Xavier, it's good to see you again. >> Thank you, hi. >> Hi. So give us the update on Cloud 28. It started out as sort of this focused European effort. It has exploded now globally. What's the update? >> So I don't remember, I don't know if you remember it. It was last year, the same event. We were in London, I believe. And we were saying, "Okay, we are 300. "How many will be next year?" I took that back. It will be 700. We are 700. >> Dave: Wow, congratulations. >> 700 members. We have been expanding in the different geographies. So also in Europe, Middle East, and Africa, but we expanded in North America, in A-Pac, Latin America, and Caribbean. So now we are present in 60 countries. We are proposing 24,000 cloud services, so the catalog has been expanding dramatically. We are offering capabilities, data center capabilities from all partners in 33 countries. And we can offer from 400 data centers already. So average we have 40,000 hits per month on the platform, acquiring members and so on. And, yes, it has been a delight to launch that everywhere. It's really taking off very, very quickly. >> And the basic value proposition, you are essentially enabling cloud partners to create cloud-like business capabilities. >> Yeah, so what we do is, first of all, we enable the partners to get known on the market on this side, to publish all their services built and consume also. So it's not only IaaS, PaaS, SaaS, but also integration services as well because it's a comprehensive value chain. Then, what we do, we're not a marketplace where people go and leave. In the center, they can speak everyday. So they publish articles, full leadership articles around security, big data, manufacturing, and so on and so on. This year, only this year, they have published 600 articles. So when you're a customer, you go to this platform. You can see the offering, but you can see how the vendor is positioning himself around the market, his value-add, and what they are doing. So digital marketing a lot, also for them. We have been increasing the value on the market of many of our partners with social media because we are very good activity in this area, and also lead-generation engine because now we have so much offerings that we can target specific campaigns for our partners in specific geographies and generate a lot of leads on the market. Last, but not least, the market is evolving. We have a lot of partners, so we create platform-connected offerings. Example we have done is a specific cloud-in-a-box for manufacturing for plants where, in six clicks, you can provision from Cloud28+ all your information system for a plant. So this is also the kind of things that we do. >> Great, okay, Eugene, tell us about Veon. Why are you in business? What's your story? >> Okay, yes. Just talk a few minutes about Veon because it's not a very well-known name around the world, and don't be ashamed if you don't know Veon because it still is the seventh largest mobile operator in the world. It's significant. We are, today, around 42,000 employees, over 12 different countries. I have to say, very unusual countries. Not the type of countries you may choose to go for holidays, but it would be a shame because, honestly, some of them are good like, you know, all Eurasia, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Armenia, Tajikistan, Kazakhstan, Georgia, Russia. We have also emerging market, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Algeria, and one, only one European market, which is Italy with WIND, WIND Three. Which means it's a very large region. We are dealing with 10, more than 10% of the total population of the globe, 235 million customers, which is significant. And within this organization, there is an enterprise division, which I'm leading, which is around 4,500 people dedicated for enterprise and wholesales. Full revenue around $3 billion, just to give you a scale on who we are. Again, not very well-known, but definitely within our footprint we are the number one in this particular region of the world. >> It's sizable, substantial business. >> Eugene: Exactly, yes. >> So what's driving your business today? Obviously mobile is exploding. >> Yes, it's clear we came from the mobile business. We are number one mobile operator in the majority of these countries. We are what we call some fixed business. And since the last two, three years when I joined the organization, we completely reorganized our business model and moving more into the what we call value added services, ICT services. And one of the components, definitely, was to try to find a partner for our cloud proposition. You need to understand that we're in a very emerging market for this type of subject. We are sitting in a very traditional way, you know, how enterprise operating. They own the infrastructure, they own data center, they own the servers, the management platform, and their own people. And they have not yet shifted to this new model, which is to try to outsource some of the infrastructure. And this is where we came into the game as a global provider in order to have enterprise really to operate the shift. There is also another interesting situation is every time we bid a cloud proposition, usually we try to centerize it and have different country. In our part of the world is not possible. We have to set up a cloud platform in every single of our countries for regulatory constraints, which is not very economical, but definitely it's an opportunity for us to lead this market especially with HP Enterprise. >> Well, it allows you to differentiate, as well, from some of the mega-cloud providers that everybody knows, everybody talks about. So is that a primary way in which you compete? >> Oh, completely. It's clear the big players today are not very well-implemented in this part of the world because of this particular constraint, outside of Italy which is a little bit different game. But it's clear in Russia and Eurasia, yes. Today there is a opportunity. We believe that we want to be the single provider within this region operating across different market segments because we're covering from SO up to multinational accounts, even government. And having a set of value propositions we can offer across every single of our countries. >> Xavier, is it common that, amongst the Cloud28+ partners, there's that theme of local presence, of course, but is there also a differential in terms of what the partners will do, the types of work they'll do, customizations? >> Yeah, typically the case of Veon is very specific because they address very specific markets. Some other players will ask different things. But what is very important in the case of Veon is, first of all, to have a ready-to-deploy solution that you can industrialize in different countries. So this is the reason why we played with one of the technology partners of Cloud28+, with Ormuco, who has a cloud-in-a-box solution that can be deployed and managed remotely if needed. But that was fitting the needs of the market. Then, what we need to do is really to engage locally. So, in this particular case, what we're going to do is to engage with the HP organization in order that when we have the needs for our customers to go for cloud computing kind of workloads, we say, "Okay, we have the solution. "We have a partner, a Cloud28+ partner, "who took the decision to go with us, "and we trust each other. "So you, Mr. Customer, you want to do "backup as a service, disaster recovery "as a service, compute, storage as a service, "or security as a service, Veon is there." And the good point is Veon is there on very qualified hardware of HP synergy with a very good solution, which is one of the solution ready for service providers of HPE and operated by a very serious tech operator with the number six on the market, this is Veon. And we go together. So in this particular case, what was interesting was to have a solution that can be deployed everywhere the same with workloads that may fit with the different expectations of the market, engage the HP people to play with and, then, we market and with Cloud28+ we'll amplify their message. We will be able to drive lead generation campaigns. We'll be able to onboard our resellers because one thing I believe is that in this kind of regions, people don't go, as you say, Eugene, directly to the cloud. They continue to go to their resellers and, "What do I need to do?" And here, you know that we have the largest reseller network in the industry. So we will introduce this solution to our resellers in order that when a reseller of HPE is in front of such a case, it can have the mind to say, "Okay, let's engage with Veon." So this is the way we are going to operate. >> So when I think of many of the Akistan countries, I think of natural resources, challenging topography, challenging terrain. How does the physical reality and the industries that typify that region impact the way you're providing cloud services? >> It's clear, we're talking sometime a very, very large geography in terms of country size. When you take only in Russia. >> Mountainous. >> Eleven time zones you have in one single country. And when we operate, yes we have to spread our capability in order to be able to touch every single country, including in some infrastructure. Especially as a carrier, I like to imagine how much we need to pull fiber, cable, across the country and have these different set up of infrastructure, cloud propositions, to make sure we can serve better in term latency especially when we're talking about financial sections and so on, which brings some level of complexity and, as I said earlier, also some level of efficiency in term investment because we are not in a perfect world, especially when we talk about the regulatory constraints, which, yes, we need to find some middle way. How we can have a better, being still competitive, but as sometimes still delivering the expected quality. But you are right. This particular part of the world require a lot of work in term of physical infrastructure and also in our team. Our people are spread across these different countries, and for that reason yes, it's not an easy situation. >> Does it drive, are you likely to see a higher demand? HPE talks about the intelligent edge. Are you likely to see a higher demand for things like the intelligent edge because of the nature of the natural resource industry's petrochemical, et cetera, mountainous regions and a lot of communities that you serve, is that going to be a driver of new services or is it going to be something else? What do you think? >> Well, I think there would be two aspects. The first one, there is, definitely, a requirement driven, very often, by very large, multinational corporations. You'll be surprised how this multinational corporations are covering this part of the world. You have natural resources. All the western industry is present. And because they are present, they need to bring their standard in term of infrastructure they are using within this particular country. That the reason, yes, the demand is coming from there. At the same time, you have the rest of the market in term of large, local businesses where it's clear. They are moving. If you're looking in our part of the world, we are exactly where we were 10 years ago in Europe, in North America, and in Asia. We are really into emerging in face, in adopting this type of infrastructure. It's clear it's going to go much more quicker because, on top of that, enterprises have big pressure to reduce costs, but at the same time not to sacrifice the quality, what they're looking. Which, again, together we're capable and we can demonstrate they can get better for less. And this is a big work, and that's the reason when Xavier was mentioning about working together in each of the countries, this was one of the critical element in choosing with HP Enterprise because I'm a mobile operator and fixed. I'm not yet organized as an ICT services or cloud. It was very important for me, if we wanted to go very quickly to associate a brand with a leading organization like HP. And I have to say, I have tested several times. Every time we say, "Okay, we are in "partnership with HP Enterprise. "We are partnered with Cloud28+." This ring immediately the bell of the enterprise we are meeting, and it's easier for us to move quicker. But, definitely, I think we have a big, big opportunity. Large market to address, but definitely something interesting to go after. >> And it's early days, it's only been two years now, what do you want from Hewlett Packard Enterprise, and what are you guys going to deliver? Let's talk road map a little bit. First, from the partner/customer. What are you driving HPE and Xavier to deliver? >> For me there would be three axes in term of development. The first one in term of value proposition. We want to be able, over the next 12, 18 months to be able to offer to the market a full set of propositions, as you mentioned earlier. But Xavier, in term of public, private, hybrid cloud, and moving to different solution, we're talking about security. And, also, we're moving into more vertical market approach. We're talking about IUT where will also be some direction. This is the first ax. The second one, it's in term of countries. We're not going to launch a platform in every single, as I said earlier. We need to do it country by country. We are starting with Russia, Ukraine, Pakistan will come behind, Algeria. Very quickly, over the next 12 months, we are going to launch one by one these different countries. And the last element for us, which is also very key, is market segment. We are organized, as I said, by market segment. SO, small-medium enterprise, large key account, multinational corporation, and government. And each of these segments have different requirements. And we need to customize our approach. This is where where working with HP and Ormuco, we want to have a very customized, bi-market segment from highly customized to off-the-shelf type proposition. But, for me, these would be the three key axes in term of development working with HP Enterprise. >> And Xavier, how does that align with your roadmap? >> Well, you know, it's fully alligned in the sense that, first of all, we are expanding a lot the value prop of Cloud28+ with ISV software vendors. And the problems of telcos and service providers moving to the cloud, that's correct there is ICT branding, and there we can help. But this is the content because one day or another, they will face what the others have been facing, even in these countries, meaning yes is not enough. So if you have a portfolio of applications, verticals, horizontal applications, that they can use to continue to satisfy the demand of the market, so it will be great for them, and we are investing a lot in this order. The other thing is today I believe that we have now reached a maturity on digital marketing with Cloud28+, which is impressive. We had a big event yesterday. I will not give to you the number of impression we had only in four hours. It has been massive. If we take that, we put this at the disposal of this partner in every single country, we will speed them on the market. So these are the two big elements. The third element is what I said about this platform connected solutions because the more we go, the more we see that our outside-in approach with Cloud28+, thinking customers first, is excellent. We need to continue on that. But, as you were mentioning, the move to the edge, we see more and more solutions for energy, for manufacturing, oil and gas, environment, that we need pure hybrid because you cannot put everything into a cloud. And where we are lucky with Veon is that they have the network. So you can imagine, they have their big cloud in a country that they could deploy also some private cloud very, very quickly in specific area within an oil and gas land or I don't know where in energy, mining, or where you have not that. And you cannot, because of latency issues you cannot go directly to the cloud, but you need to handle at the edge, send back to the cloud for analytics or AI or so on, and this will be at the disposal for them. And I believe the combination of the two for that will be for the benefit of the customer. So this is my opinion. >> I completely agree. I think they approach, in term of the partnership, as I said, I think when we're going to deal with very large organizations is going to be very infrastructure-type discussion driven. But when we're going to cool down, it's purely, definitely Sowasis, content. I want to be able to address, for example, the marketing department, how we can help them to understand the behavior of a consumer by using data, big data, you know, analytics. In term of delivery for an organization, using fleet management. In term of manufacturing, using more IUT. But when you look at these different solutions, what is below is a type of infrastructure. Is to have a cloud infrastructure where we can rely on a strong partnership, bringing this solution, and offering to our customer definitely a very cost-effective but also agile, very, you know, able to move with the market demand in a very vertical way, but definitely this is a way we want to work together. >> Excellent. All right, we have to leave it there, gentlemen. Cloud is exploding. Cloud is going to be local. We've talked about this a lot. Hybrid IT, intelligence edge with a local flavor. Gentlemen, thanks very much for coming. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you. >> And congratulations for all the success. All right, keep it right there, everybody. We'll be back with our next guest. This is theCUBE. We're live from HPE Discover Madrid 2017. Be right back. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
brought to you by Hewlett Packard Enterprise. Welcome back, Xavier, it's good to see you again. What's the update? And we were saying, "Okay, we are 300. We have been expanding in the different geographies. And the basic value proposition, You can see the offering, but you can see how the vendor Why are you in business? Not the type of countries you may choose So what's driving your business today? in the majority of these countries. So is that a primary way in which you compete? We believe that we want to be the single engage the HP people to play with and, then, we market and the industries that typify that region impact When you take only in Russia. cloud propositions, to make sure we is that going to be a driver of new services the enterprise we are meeting, and what are you guys going to deliver? And the last element for us, the move to the edge, we see more and more the marketing department, how we can help them Cloud is going to be local. And congratulations for all the success.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Eugene Viskovic | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Eugene | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Hewlett Packard Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
London | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Xavier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Russia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Xavier Poisson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Madrid | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
600 articles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Asia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Africa | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Caribbean | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Eurasia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Middle East | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Veon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
400 data centers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Latin America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
third element | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
Ormuco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
HP Enterprise | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
A-Pac | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
This year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Italy | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
700 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
this year | DATE | 0.99+ |
four hours | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
300 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
WIND | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two aspects | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
around $3 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
24,000 cloud services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two big elements | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
more than 10% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Georgia | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
six clicks | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Madrid, Spain | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
three key axes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
10 years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Tajikistan | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
around 42,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Kyrgyzstan | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
Kazakhstan | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
second one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 12 different countries | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
700 members | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
around 4,500 people | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
60 countries | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
one single country | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Armenia | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
Chris Boots, Quadrocopter | Airworks 2017
>> Hey, welcome back everybody, Jeff Frick here with the Cube. We are here in Denver, Colorado at the DJI AirWorks show, it's their second show; about 600 people talking about commercial applications for the DJI drone platform. Really exciting agriculture, construction, public safety, no fun stuff, well, it's all kind of fun, really about the commercial applications, and we're excited to have Chris Boots with us, he is the chief engineer of Quadrocopter. Chris, good to see you. >> Good to see you. >> So we talked a little bit about what Quadrocopter does, and you're really into the enterprise space, these are not platforms that are generally available, you've got to get them through a dealer, they're expensive, they're complicated pieces of equipment, and that's a place you guys have been playing for a long time. >> Absolutely. For example, the Wind Series was unveiled today, the 4 and the 8; AirWorks 2016 introduced the Wind 1 and 2, and what these are, are basically universal platforms that allow customers to put various different, whether it be gimbals or sensors, it's kind of just a blank slate DJI product. That way you're not constrained to the limitations of an M200 or an Aspire or anything like that. When Quadrocopter began almost a decade ago, we prided ourselves on delivering custom-tailored systems to various different customer needs, so we felt right at home when DJI unveiled the Wind series. >> So really what you mean is it's kind of stripped down to its bare bones components so that you can design it at whatever payloads you want for the specific application, and they're also big, heavy lifters, right? We saw the agricultural one, I think it holds like two and a half gallons, 22 pounds of liquid, so these are also heavy lift machines, these are not little Mavics or Sparks. >> Yeah, precisely, yeah. If you need to lift something lightweight, there's the Wind 1. If you need to lift something extremely heavy, there's the Wind 4 and the Wind 8 which can lift well over 20 to 25 pounds of payload, so you're lifting some big stuff with this. >> So when you talk to enterprise customers, and kind of their journey into getting into and using a drone platform for their business process, how do they get started, you know, what do you see as kind of their first steps where people have some success and then you know, build into more of a fleet if you will, integrate it more to their processes? How do most companies get started? Do they say yeah this looks like a cool platform, how do we use it? >> That's kind of exactly how it happens. It just all starts with an idea. Most of our customers if they're not already existing UAS corporations and companies, they can be just somebody like you or I that comes up with an interesting UAV solution and you know, they do some Google searching, they do some research, they find something like this doesn't exist. Where do I go from here? So it doesn't take them very long to start making phone calls, and more often than not they call us at Quadrocopter, and one of my pet peeves is I don't like saying no to a customer when they have an idea, so that basically takes their idea, it takes our resources whether it be DJI or third party integrations, and making their dream a reality, so it's not always cinematography and cameras, it can be sensors or you name it, so yeah! >> So what are some of the more innovative uses that you've seen people use the DJI platform for that you would have never thought of, most people on the street would never have an idea that this is a useful application for this platform? >> Sure, well, I'll talk a little bit about the latest Wind application that we designed this year. We utilized the larger of the four copters, the Wind 8, which is an octocopter, and the client had the idea of inspecting methane pipelines. Now these pipelines need to be inspected every six months per governmental regulation. Currently, the only way that most companies like BP and other gas industries are doing this is by foot, by ATV, with handheld sensors, or on a large scale with rotorcraft like helicopters and people hanging off the sides of them, again with handheld devices. >> And what, they've got specialty sensors that they're looking for leaks and this and that, it's not really visual inspection I take it, or is it both probably? >> A lot of times they use either a laser-based or a thermal-based handheld sensor, so like a flare thermal camera. In our case, we didn't want to be constrained to the environmental influences that thermal can sometimes have, whether it's cold or it's dark or bright out, it can really skew the results, so in our case, it was our goal to find something that isn't influenced by the external environments. So we officially landed on a laser-based methane detector and paired that with the Wind 8, which then flies the pipeline route in 10 to 20 foot segments, comes back, and that data is used in mapping software to find out what the results were along that pipeline. If it is found that something is leaking, that file that is pulled off the aircraft will say exactly where it was, how concentrated it was at that exact point, at which point somebody can on the ground inspect that further. It totally gets rid of the whole safety issue of somebody on the ground or in the air and the expensive part of man power, of walking a pipeline. We can do it more efficiently, we can do it way more safer, and we get if not better results. >> The 10 to 20 feet doesn't sound like very long. Is that just because of, >> 20 miles. >> Oh 20 miles. You said feet. So it's 10 to 20 mile runs, then in parts they take the data and run it again. And what was the weight of that payload? >> The sensor itself doesn't really weigh much, I'd say two or three pounds. Most of the payload on the Wind 8 is actually the batteries. So the whole all-up weight of the craft is somewhere around 30 pounds. It's not extremely heavy, but for endurance sake, she'll fly for well over an hour. So at 10, 15 miles per hour, you can really cover some pipeline with battery to spare. >> So was that an initial trial for this customer, to try this solution? >> Yeah, this particular combination of sensor and copter had never been tried before, so it very much is an industry first in this regard, at least with DJI and the sensor. >> So where do they want to go next? I mean, it begs the question. The whole theme of today's keynote was like scale, no longer single operator, single machine, single data, but really starting to think in terms of fleets and multi-units, so is that somewhere where this particular customer wants to go, or how do you see it progressing for them? >> This particular client is a third party, so they aren't directly with BP, but BP often, I don't want to speak on behalf of BP, but a lot of gas companies outsource their inspection services to other different companies, so this particular land surveying company will use this and meet their demands of inspecting whatever section of pipeline that they're designated every six months. >> Yeah, that's great, alright, Chris, thank you for spending a few minutes, I mean that's a great case study and using the big heavy lift stuff, much more fun probably than the Spark! >> Absolutely, yeah, if you guys have any questions, hit me up at quadrocopter.com! >> Alright, he's Chris Boots, I'm Jeff Frick, you are watching the Cube. We're at DJI AirWorks 2017 in Denver. Catch you next time; thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
for the DJI drone platform. and that's a place you that allow customers to so that you can design it at If you need to lift something lightweight, and you know, they do and the client had the idea of and paired that with the Wind 8, The 10 to 20 feet doesn't So it's 10 to 20 mile runs, Most of the payload on the Wind at least with DJI and the sensor. so is that somewhere where so they aren't directly with BP, Absolutely, yeah, if you you are watching the Cube.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Chris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Boots | PERSON | 0.99+ |
22 pounds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Denver | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
BP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Chris Boots | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 miles | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DJI | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
M200 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
three pounds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second show | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 mile | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first steps | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 feet | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two and a half gallons | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
20 foot | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Denver, Colorado | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Wind 1 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
Quadrocopter | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Aspire | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
about 600 people | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
four copters | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Wind Series | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.96+ |
around 30 pounds | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ | |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
a decade ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
25 pounds | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
single machine | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Wind 8 | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
every six months | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Wind 4 | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
quadrocopter.com | OTHER | 0.91+ |
2 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.9+ |
single data | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
pet peeves | QUANTITY | 0.87+ |
Wind 8 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.87+ |
8 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.87+ |
over 20 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Wind series | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.86+ |
Mavics | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
4 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.85+ |
Wind 1 | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
10, 15 miles per hour | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
over an hour | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
DJI AirWorks | EVENT | 0.77+ |
AirWorks 2016 | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.71+ |
single operator | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
UAS | ORGANIZATION | 0.66+ |
Wind | TITLE | 0.64+ |
Sparks | ORGANIZATION | 0.62+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.59+ |
AirWorks 2017 | EVENT | 0.55+ |
Cube | PERSON | 0.48+ |
Wind | QUANTITY | 0.42+ |
Airworks | EVENT | 0.38+ |
Tom Stuermer, Accenture – When IoT Met AI: The Intelligence of Things - #theCUBE
>> Narrator: From the Fairmont Hotel in the heart of Silicon Valley, it's theCUBE. Covering When IoT met AI: The Intelligence of Things. Brought to you by Western Digital. >> Hey welcome back here everybody Jeff Frick here with theCUBE. We're in downtown San Jose at the Fairmont Hotel. At a little event it's When IoT Met AI: The Intelligence of Things. As we hear about the Internet of Things all the time this is really about the data elements behind AI, and machine learning, and IoT. And we're going to get into it with some of the special guests here. We're excited to get the guy that's going to kick off this whole program shortly is Tom Stuermer. He is the I got to get the new title, the Global Managing Director, Ecosystem and Partnership, from Accenture. Tom, welcome-- >> Thank you, Jeff. >> And congrats on the promotion. >> Thank you. >> So IoT, AI, buzz words, a lot of stuff going on but we're really starting to see stuff begin to happen. I mean there's lots of little subtle ways that we're seeing AI work its way in to our lives, and machine learning work our way into its life, but obviously there's a much bigger wave that's about to crest here, shortly. So as you kind of look at the landscape from your point of view, you get to work with a lot of customers, you get to see this stuff implemented in industry, what's kind of your take on where we are? >> Well, I would say that we're actually very early. There are certain spaces with very well-defined parameters where AI's been implemented successfully, industrial controls on a micro level where there's a lot of well-known parameters that the systems need to operate in. And it's been very easy to be able to set those parameters up. There's been a lot of historical heuristic systems to kind of define how those work, and they're really replacing them with AI. So in the industrial spaces a lot of take up and we'll even talk a little bit later about Siemens who's really created a sort of a self-managed factory. Who's been able to take that out from a tool level, to a system level, to a factory level, to enable that to happen at those broader capabilities. I think that's one of the inflection points we're going to see in other areas where there's a lot more predictability and a lot of other IoT systems. To be able to take that kind of system level and larger scale factors of AI and enable prediction around that, like supply chains for example. So we're really not seeing a lot of that yet, but we're seeing some of the micro pieces being injected in where the danger of it going wrong is lower, because the training for those systems is very difficult. >> It's interesting, there's so much talk about the sensors, and the edge, and edge computing, and that's interesting. But as you said it's really much more of a system approach is what you need. And it's really kind of the economic boundaries of the logical system by which you're trying to make a decision in. We talk all the time, we optimizing for one wind turbine? Are you optimizing for one field that contains so many wind turbines? Are you optimizing for the entire plant? Or are you optimizing for a much bigger larger system that may or may not impact what you did on that original single turbine? So a systems approach is a really critical importance. >> It is and what we've seen is that IoT investments have trailed a lot of expectations as to when they were going to really jump in the enterprise. And what we're finding is that when we talk to our customers a lot of them are saying, look I've already got data. I've got some data. Let's say I'm a mining company and I've got equipment down in mines, I've got sensors around oxygen levels, I just don't get that much value from it. And part of the challenge is that they're looking at it from a historical data perspective. And they're saying well I can see the trajectory over time of what's happening inside of my mind. But I haven't really been able to put in prediction. I haven't been able to sort of assess when equipment might fail. And so we're seeing that when we're able to show them the ability to affect an eventual failure that might shut down revenue for a day or two when some significant equipment fails, we're able to get them to start making those investments and they're starting to see the value in those micro pockets. And so I think we're going to see it start to propagate itself through in a smaller scale, and prove itself, because there's a lot of uncertainty. There's a lot of work that's got to be done to stitch them together, and IoT infrastructure itself is already a pretty big investment as it is. >> Short that mine company, because we had Caterpillar on a couple weeks ago and you know their driving fleets of autonomous vehicles, they're talking about some of those giant mining trucks who any unscheduled downtime the economic impact is immense well beyond worrying about a driver being sick, or had a fight with his wife, or whatever reason is bringing down the productivity of those vehicles. So it's actually amazing the little pockets where people are doing it. I'm curious to get your point of view too on kind of you managed to comment the guy's like I'm not sure what the value is because the other kind of big topic that we see is when will the data and the intelligence around the data actually start to impact the balance sheet? Because data used to be kind of a pain, right? You had to store it, and keep it, and it cost money, and you had to provision servers, and storage, but really now and the future the data that you have, the algorithms you apply to it will probably be an increasing percentage of your asset value if not the primary part of you asset value, you seeing some people start to figure that out? >> Well they are. So if you look, if step back away from IoT for a minute and you look at how AI is being applied more broadly, we're finding some transformational value propositions that are delivering a lot of impacts to the bottom line. And it's anywhere from where people inside of a company interact with their customers, being able to anticipate their next move, being able to predict given these parameters of this customer what kind of customer care agent should I put on the phone with them before you even pick up the phone to anticipate some of those expectations. And we're seeing a lot of value in things like that. And so, excuse me, and so when you zoom it back in to IoT some of the challenges are that the infrastructure to implement IoT is very fragmented. There's 360 some IoT platform providers out in the world and the places where we're seeing a lot of traction in using predictive analytics and AI for IoT is really coming in the verticals like industrial equipment manufacturers where they've kind of owned the stack and they can define everything from the bottom up. And what they're actually being able to do is to start to sell product heavy equipment by the hour, by the use, because they're able to get telemeter off of that product, see what's happening, be able to see when a failure is about to come, and actually sell it as a service back to a customer and be able to predictably analyze when something fails and get spares there in time. And so those are some of the pockets where it's really far ahead because they've got a lot of vertical integration of what's happening. And I think the challenge on adoption of broader scale for companies that don't sell very expensive assets into the market is how do I as a company start to stitch my own assets that are for all kinds of different providers, and all kinds of the different companies, into a single platform? And what the focus has really been in IoT lately for the past couple of years is what infrastructure should I place to get the data? How do I provision equipment? How do I track it? How do I manage it? How do I get the data back? And I think that's necessary but completely insufficient to really get a lot of value IoT, because really all your able to do then is get data. What do you do with it? All the value is really in the data itself. And so the alternative approach a lot of companies are taking is starting to attack some of these smaller problems. And each one of them tends to have a lot of value on its own, and so they're really deploying that way. And some of them are looking for ways to let the battles of the platforms, let's at least get from 360 down to 200 so that I can make some bets. And it's actually proving to be a value, but I think that is one of the obstacles that we have to adoption. >> The other thing you mentioned interesting before we turned on the cameras is really thinking about AI as a way to adjust the way that we interact with the machines. There's two views of the machines taking over the world, is it the beautiful view, or we can freeze this up to do other things? Or certainly nobody has a job, right? The answer is probably somewhere in the middle. But clearly AI is going to change the way, and we're starting to see just the barely the beginnings with Alexa, and Siri, and Google Home, with voice interfacing and the way that we interact with these machines which is going to change dramatically with the power of, as you said, prescriptive analytics, presumptive activity, and just change that interaction from what's been a very rote, fixed, hard to change to putting as you said, some of these lighter weight, faster to move, more agile layers on the top stack which can still integrate with some of those core SAP systems, and systems of record in a completely different way. >> Exactly, you know I often use the metaphor of autonomous driving and people seem to think that that's kind of way far out there. But if you look at how driving an autonomous vehicle's so much different from driving a regular car, right? You have to worry about at the minutia of executing the driving process. You don't have to worry about throttle, break. You'd have to worry about taking a right turn on red. You'd have to worry about speeding. What you have to worry about is the more abstract concepts of source, destination, route that I might want to take. You can offload that as well. And so it changes what the person interacting with the AI system is actually able to do, and the level of cognitive capability that they're able to exercise. We're seeing similar things in medical treatment. We're using AI to do predictive analytics around injury coming off of medical equipment. It's not only starting to improve diagnoses in certain scenarios, but it's also enabling the techs and the doctors involved in the scans to think on a more abstract level about what the broader medical issues are. And so it's really changing sort of the dialogue that's happening around what's going on. And I think this is a good metaphor for us to look at when we talk about societal impacts of AI as well. Because there are some people who embrace moving forward to those higher cognitive activities and some who resist it. But I think if you look at it from a customer standpoint as well, no matter what business you're in if you're a services business, if you're a product business, the way you interact with your employees and the way you interact with your customers can fundamentally be changed with AI, because AI can enable the technology to bend it to your intentions. Someone at the call center that we talked about. I mean those are subtle activities. It's not just AI for voice recognition, but it's also using AI to alter what options are given to you, and what scenarios are going to be most beneficial. And more often than not you get it right. >> Well the other great thing about autonomous vehicles, it's just a fun topic because it's something that people can understand, and they can see, and they can touch in terms of a concept to talk about, some of these higher level concepts. But the second order impacts which most people don't even begin to think, they're like I want to drive my car is, you don't need parking lots anymore because the cars can all park off site. Just Like they do at airports today at the rental car agency. You don't need to build a crash cage anymore, because the things are not going to crash that often compared to human drivers. So how does the interior experience of a car change when you don't have to build basically a crash cage? I mean there's just so many second order impacts that people don't even really begin to think about. And we see this time and time again, we saw it with cloud innovation where it's not just is it cheaper to rent a server from Amazon than to buy one from somebody else? It's does the opportunity for innovation enable more of your people to make more contributions than they could before because they were too impatient to wait to order the server from the IT guy? So that's where I think too people so underestimate kind of the big Moore's Law my favorite, we overestimate in the short term and completely underestimate in the long term, the impacts of these things. >> It's the doubling function, exactly. >> Jeff: Yeah, absolutely. >> I mean it's hard for people, human kind is geared towards linear thinking, and so when something like Moore's Law continues to double every 18 months price performance continues to increase. Storage, compute, visualization, display. >> Networking, 5G. >> You know the sensors in MEMS, all of these things have gotten so much cheaper. It's hard for human of any intelligence to really comprehend what happens when that doubling occurs for the next 20 years. Which we're now getting on the tail end of that fact. And so those manifest themselves in ways that are a little bit unpredictable, and I think that's going to be one of our most exciting challenges over the next five years is what does an enterprise look like? What does a product look like? One of the lessons that, I spent a lot of time in race car engineering in my younger days and actually did quants and analytics, what we learned from that point is as you learned about the data you started to fundamentally change the architecture of the product. And I think that's going to be a whole new series of activities that are going to have to happen in the marketplace. Is people rethinking fundamental product. There's a great example of a company that's completely disrupted an industry. On the surface of it it's been disrupted because of the fact that they essentially disassociated the consumption from the provision of the product. And didn't have to own those assets so they could grow rapidly. But what they fundamentally did was to use AI to be able to broker when should I get more cars, where should the cars go? And because they're also we're on the forefront of being able to drive, this whole notion of consumption of cars, and getting people's conceptual mindset shifted to having owned a car to I know an Uber's going to be there. It becomes like a power outlet. I can just rely on it. And now people are actually starting to double think about should I even own a car? >> Whole different impact of the autonomous vehicles. And if I do own a car why should it be sitting in the driveway when I'm not driving it? Or I send it out to go work for me make it a performing asset. Well great conversation. You guys Accenture's in a great spot. You're always at the cutting edge. I used to tease a guy I used to work with at Accenture you've got to squeeze out all the fat in the supply chain (laughs) your RP days and again a lot of these things are people changing the lens and seeing fat and inefficiency and then attacking it in a different way whether it's Uber, Airbnb, with empty rooms in people's houses. We had Paul Doherty on at the GE Industrial Internet launch a few years back, so you guys are in a great position because you get to sit right at the forefront and help these people make those digital transformations. >> I appreciate that. >> I will tell you I mean supply chains is another one of those high level systems opportunities for AI where being able to optimize, think about it a completely automated distribution chain from factory all the way to the drone landing at your front doorstep as a consumer. That's a whole nother level of efficiency that we can't even contemplate right now. >> Don't bet against Bezos that's what I always say. All right, Tom Stuermer thanks for spending a few minutes and good luck with the keynote. >> I appreciate it Jeff. >> All right, I'm Jeff Frick you're watching theCUBE. We are at The Intelligence of Things, When IoT met AI. You're watching theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Western Digital. He is the I got to get the new title, that's about to crest here, shortly. that the systems need to operate in. And it's really kind of the economic boundaries the ability to affect an eventual failure the data that you have, the algorithms you apply to it and all kinds of the different companies, to adjust the way that we interact with the machines. and the way you interact with your customers because the things are not going to crash continues to double every 18 months And I think that's going to be a whole new series Whole different impact of the autonomous vehicles. all the way to the drone landing a few minutes and good luck with the keynote. We are at The Intelligence of Things, When IoT met AI.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Tom Stuermer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Accenture | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Western Digital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Paul Doherty | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Siemens | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
360 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two views | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Airbnb | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tom | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Bezos | PERSON | 0.99+ |
a day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
second order | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
The Intelligence of Things | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Siri | TITLE | 0.98+ |
single platform | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Global Managing Director | TITLE | 0.96+ |
200 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Alexa | TITLE | 0.96+ |
When IoT Met AI: The Intelligence of Things | TITLE | 0.96+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
couple weeks ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
each one | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
one field | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
past couple of years | DATE | 0.91+ |
second order impacts | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Ecosystem | TITLE | 0.86+ |
Partnership | TITLE | 0.84+ |
San Jose | LOCATION | 0.83+ |
Moore's Law | TITLE | 0.81+ |
The Intelligence of | TITLE | 0.78+ |
Google Home | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.77+ |
one wind turbine | QUANTITY | 0.75+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
One of the | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
every 18 months | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
double | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
GE Industrial | ORGANIZATION | 0.69+ |
next five years | DATE | 0.66+ |
few years back | DATE | 0.66+ |
one of the obstacles | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
Fairmont Hotel | LOCATION | 0.61+ |
next 20 years | DATE | 0.6+ |
Internet | EVENT | 0.6+ |
a minute | QUANTITY | 0.6+ |
SAP | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
Caterpillar | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
theCUBE | TITLE | 0.43+ |
#theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.39+ |