William Morgan, Buoyant | Kubecon + Cloudnativecon Europe 2022
>> Announcer: theCUBE presents Kubecon and Cloudnativecon Europe, 2022. Brought to you by Red Hat, the cloud native computing foundation and its ecosystem partners. >> Welcome to Valencia, Spain in Kubecon, Cloudnativecon Europe 2022. I'm Keith Townsend and alongside Enrico senior IT analyst for (indistinct). Welcome back to the show Enrico. >> Thank you again for having me here. >> First impressions of Kubecon. >> Well, great show. As I mentioned before, I think that we are really in this very positive mood of talking with each other and people wanting to see the projects, people that build the projects and it's amazing. A lot of interesting conversation in the show floor and in the various sessions, very positive mood. >> So this is going to be a fun one, we have some amazing builders on the show this week and none other than William Morgan, CEO of Buoyant. What's your role in the Linkerd project? >> So I was one of the original creators of Linkerd, but at this point I'm just the beautiful face of the project. (all laughing) >> Speaking of beautiful face of the project Linkerd just graduated from as a CNCF project. >> Yeah, that's right so last year we became the first service mesh to graduate in the CNCF, very proud of that and that's thanks largely to the incredible community around Linkerd that is just excited about the project and wants to talk about it and wants to be involved. >> So let's talk about the significance of that. Linkerd not the only service mesh project out there. Talk to me about the level effort to get it to the point that it's graduated. You don't see too many projects graduating CNCF in general so let's talk about kind of the work needed to get Linkerd to this point. >> Yeah so the bar is high and it's mostly a measure, not necessarily of like the project being technically good or bad or anything but it's really a measure of maturity of the community around it so is it being adopted by organizations that are really relying on it in a critical way? Is it being adopted across industries? Is it having kind of a significant impact on the Cloudnative community? And so for us there was the work involved in that was really not any different from the work involved in kind of maintaining Linkerd and growing the community in the first place, which is you try and make it really useful. You try and make it really easy to get started with, you try and be supportive and to have a friendly and welcoming community. And if you do those things and you kind of naturally get yourself to the point where it's a really strong community full of people who are excited about it. >> So from the point of view of users adopting this technology, so we are talking about everybody or do you see really large organization, large Kubernetes clusters infrastructure adopting it? >> Yeah, so the answer to that is changed a little bit over time but at this point we see Linkerd adoption across industries, across verticals, and we see it from very small companies to very large ones so one of the talks I'm really excited about at this conference is from the folks at Xbox cloud gaming who are going to talk about how they deployed Linkerd across 22,000 pods around the world to serve basically on demand video games. Never a use case I would ever have imagined for Linkerd and at the previous Kubecon virtually Kubecon EU, we had a whole keynote about how Linkerd was used to combat COVID 19. So all sorts of uses and it really doesn't, whether it's a small cluster or large cluster it's equally applicable. >> Wow so as we talk about Linkerd service mesh we obviously are going to talk about security, application control, etcetera. But in this climate software supply chain is critical and you think about open source software supply chain, talk to us about the recent security audit of Linkerd. >> Yeah so one of the things that we do as part of a CNCF project and also as part of, I think our relationship with our community is we have regular security audits where we engage security professionals who are very thorough and dig into all the details. Of course the source code is all out there, so anyone can read through the code but they'll build threat model analysis and things like that. And then we take their report and we publish it. We say, "Hey look, here's the situation." So we have earlier reports online and this newest one was done by a company called Trail of Bits and they built a whole threat model and looked through all the different ways that Linkerd could go wrong and they always find issues of course, it would be very scary, I think, to get a report that was like, no, we didn't find- >> Yeah everything's clean. >> Yeah everything's fine, should be okay, I don't know. But they did not find anything critical. They found some issues that we rapidly addressed and then everything gets written up in the report and then we publish it, as part of an open source artifact. >> How do you, let's say, do they give you and adds up something? So if something happens so that you can act on the code before somebody else discovers the- >> Yeah, they'll give you a preview of what they found and then often it's not like you're going before the judge and the judge makes a judgment and then like off to jail, it's a dialogue because they don't necessarily understand the project. Well, they definitely don't understand it as well as you do. So you are helping them understand which parts are interesting to look at from the security perspective, which parts are not that interesting. They do their own investigation of course but it's a dialogue the entire time. So you do have an opportunity to say, "Oh you told me that was a a minor issue. "I actually think that's larger or vice versa." You think that's a big problem actually, we thought about that and it's not a big problem because of whatever. So it's a collaborative process. >> So Linkerd been around, like when I first learned about service mesh Linkerd was the project that I learned about. It's been there for a long time, just mentioned 22,000 clusters. That's just mind boggling- >> Pods, 22,000 pods. >> That's pods. >> Clusters would be great. >> Yeah, clusters would be great too but it filled 22,000 pods. >> It's a big deployment. >> That's a big deployment of Linkerd, but all the way down to the smallest set of pods as well. What are some of the recent project updates some of the learnings you bought back from the community and updated the project as a result? >> Yeah so a big one for us, on the topic of security, Linkerd, a big driver of Linkerd adoption is security and less on the supply chain side and more on the traffic, like live traffic security. So things like mutual TLS, so you can encrypt the communication between pods and make sure it's authenticated. One of the recent feature additions is authorization policy so you can lock down connections between services and you can say Service A is only allowed to talk to Service B and I want to do that not based on network identity, not based on like IP addresses, 'cause those are spoofable and we've kind of like as an industry moved, we've gotten a little more advanced from that but actually based on the workload identity as captured by the mutual TLS certificate exchange. So we give you the ability now to restrict the types of communication that are allowed to happen on your cluster. >> So, okay this is what happened. What about the future? Can you give us into suggestion on what is going to happen in the medium and long term? >> I think we're done you know we graduated, so we're just going to stop. (all laughing) What else is there to do? There's no grad school. No, so for us, there's a clear roadmap ahead continuing down the security realm, for sure. We've given you kind of the very first building block which at the service level, but coming up in the 2.12 release we'll have route based policy as well, as you can say this service is only allowed to call these three routes on this end point. And we'll be working later to do things like mesh expansions so we can run the data plane outside of Kubernetes, so the control plane will stay in Kubernetes but the data plane will, you'll be able to run that on Vms and things like that. And then of course in the, we're also starting to look at things like, I like to make a fun of (indistinct) a lot but we are actually starting to look at (indistinct) in the ways that that might actually be useful for Linkerd users. >> So we talk a lot about the flexibility of a project like Linkerd you can do amazing things with it from a security perspective but we're talking still to a DevOps type cloud of developers who are spread thin across their skillset. How do you help balance the need for the flexibility which usually comes with more nerd knobs and servicing a crowd that wants even higher levels of abstraction and simplicity. >> Yeah, that's a great question and this is what makes Linkerd so unique in the service mesh spaces. We have a laser focus on simplicity and especially on operational simplicity so our audience, we can make it easy to install Linkerd but what we really care about is when you're running it and you're on call for it and it's sitting in this critical, vulnerable part of your infrastructure, do you feel confident in that? Do you feel like you understand it? Do you feel like you can observe it? Do you feel like you can predict what it's going to do? And so every aspect of Linkerd is designed to be as operationally simple as possible. So when we deliver features, that's always our primary consideration, is we have to reject the urge, we have an urge as engineers to like want to build everything, it's an ultimate platform to solve all problems and we have to really be disciplined and say we're not going to do that, we're going to look at solving the minimum possible problem with a minimum set are features because we need to keep things simple and then we need to look at the human aspect to that. And I think that's been a part of Linkerd's success. And then on the Buoyant side, of course, I don't just work on Linkerd, I also work on Buoyant which helps organizations adopt Linkerd and increasingly large organizations that are not service mesh experts don't want to be service mesh experts, they want to spend their time and energy developing their business, right? And building the business logic that powers their company. So for them we have actually recently introduced, fully managed Linkerd where we can take on, even though Linkerd has to run on your cluster, the sidecar proxies has to be alongside your application. We can actually take on the operational burden of upgrades and trust income rotation, and installation. And you could effectively treat it as a utility, and have a hosted-like experience even though the actual bits, at least most of them not all of them, most of 'em have to live on your cluster. >> I love the focus of most CNCF projects, it's peanut butter or jelly, not peanut butter trying to be become jelly. What's the peanut butter to Linkerd's jelly? Like where does Linkerd stop? And some of the things that customers should really consider when looking at service mesh? >> Yeah, now that's a great way of looking at it and I actually think that philosophy comes from Kubernetes. I think Kubernetes itself, one of the reasons it was so successful is because it had some clearly delineated boundaries. It said, "This is what we're going to do. "And this is what we're not going to do. "So we're going to do layer three, four networking, "but we're going to stop there, "we're not going to do anything with layer seven." And that allowed the service mesh. So I guess if I were to go down the bread of the sandwich is Kubernetes, and then Linkerd is the peanut butter, I guess. And then the jelly, so I think the jelly is every other aspect of of building a platform. So if you are the audience for Linkerd most of the time is a platform owners. They're building a platform an internal platform for their developers to write code and so, as part of that, of course you've got Kubernetes, you've got Linkerd, but you've also got a CICD system. You've also got a code repository that's GitLab or or GitHub or whatever, you've got other kind of tools that are enforcing various other constraints. All of that is the jelly in the, this is analogy it's getting complicated now, and like the platform sandwich that you're serving. >> So talk to us about trans and service mesh from the, as we think of the macro. >> Yeah, so it's been an interesting space because, we were talking a little bit about this before the show but, there was so much buzz and then what we saw was basically it took two years for that buzz to become actual adoption and now a lot of the buzz is off on other exciting things and the people who remain in the Linkerd space are very focused on, "Oh, I actually have a real problem "that I need to solve "and I need to solve it now." So that's been great. So in terms of broader trends, I think one thing we've seen for sure is the service mesh space is kind of notorious for complexity, and a lot of what we've been doing on the Linkerd side has been trying to reverse that idea, because it doesn't actually have to be complex. There's interesting stuff you can do, especially when you get into the way we handle the sidecar model. It's actually really, it's a wonderful model operationally. It's really, it feels weird at first and then you're like, "Oh, actually this makes my operations a lot easier." So a lot of the trends that I see at least for Linkerd is doubling down on the sidecar model trying to make side cars as small and as thin as possible and try and make them kind of transparent to the rest of the application. >> Well, William Morgan, one of the coolest Twitter handles I've seen at WM on Twitter, that's actually a really cool Twitter handle. >> William: Thank you. >> CEO of Buoyant. Thank you for joining theCube again, Cube alum. From Valencia Spain, I'm Keith Towns, along with Enrico's (indistinct) and you're watching theCube, the leader in high tech coverage. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
the cloud native computing foundation I'm Keith Townsend and alongside Enrico and in the various sessions, on the show this week the beautiful face of the project. face of the project the first service mesh kind of the work needed and growing the community Yeah, so the answer to that and you think about open Yeah so one of the things that we do and then we publish it, and the judge makes a judgment So Linkerd been around, but it filled 22,000 pods. some of the learnings you bought back and more on the traffic, in the medium and long term? so the control plane the flexibility of a project like Linkerd the human aspect to that. And some of the things that customers and like the platform sandwich So talk to us about and now a lot of the buzz is one of the coolest the leader in high tech coverage.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Keith Townsend | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
22,000 pods | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Trail of Bits | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
William | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Linkerd | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
William Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Buoyant | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Keith Towns | PERSON | 0.99+ |
William Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Valencia, Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cloudnativecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Valencia Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
22,000 clusters | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Enrico | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
Kubecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Xbox | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.96+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
CNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.95+ |
first service | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
GitHub | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
First impressions | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
Service B | OTHER | 0.83+ |
layer three | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
first building block | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
theCube | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
CEO | PERSON | 0.78+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
2.12 | DATE | 0.78+ |
Service A | OTHER | 0.77+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
William Morgan, Buoyant | Kubecon + Cloudnativecon Europe 2022
>>The cube presents, Coon and cloud native con Europe 22, brought to you by the cloud native computing foundation. >>Welcome to vincia Spain in Coon cloud native con Europe, 2022. I'm Keith towns alongside en Rico senior. Etti senior it analyst for giong welcome back to the show en >>Rico. Thank you again for having me here. >>First impressions of QAN. >>Well, great show. As, as I mentioned before, I think that we are really in this very positive mode of talking with each other and people wanting to see, you know, the projects, people that build the projects at it's amazing. I mean, a lot of interesting conversation in the show floor and in the various sessions, very positive move. >>So this is gonna be a fun one. We have some amazing builders on the show this week, and none other than William Morgan, CEO of buoyant. What's your role in the link D project? >>So I was one of the original creators of link D but at this point I'm just the, the beautiful face of the project. >>Speaking of beautiful face of the project, linker D just graduated from as a CNCF project. >>Yeah, that's right. So last year we, we became the first service mesh to graduate in the CNCF. Very proud of that. And that's thanks, you know, largely to the incredible community around Linky that is just excited about the project and, you know, wants to talk about it and wants to be involved. >>So let's talk about the significance of that link D not the only service mesh project out there. Talk to me about the level effort to get it to the point that it's graduated. That's you don't see too many projects graduating CNCF in general. So let's talk about kind of the work needed to get Nier D to this point. >>Yeah. So, you know, the, the, the bar is high and it's mostly a measure, not necessarily of like the, the project being technically good or bad or anything, but it's really a measure of maturity of the community around it. So is it being adopted by organizations that are really relying on it in a critical way? Is it, you know, being adopted across industries, you know, is it having kind of a significant impact on the cloud native community? And so for us, you know, there was the, the work involved in that was really not any different from the work involved in, in kind of maintaining ity and growing the community in the first place, which is you try and make it really useful. You try and make it really easy to get started with you, try and be supportive and to, you know, have a, a friendly and welcoming community. And if you do those things and, you know, you kind of naturally get yourself to the point where it's a, it's a really strong community full of people who are excited about it. >>So from the of view of, you know, users adopting the, this technology, so we are talking about everybody, or do you see really, you know, large organization, large Kubernetes yeah. Clusters infrastructure adopting it. >>Yeah. So that's the answer to that is changed a little bit over time. But at this point we see Linky adoption across industries, across verticals, and we see it from very small companies to very large ones. So, you know, one of the talks I'm really excited about at this conference is from the folks at Xbox cloud gaming, who talked about, who are gonna talk about how they deployed Linky across, you know, 22,000 pods around the world to serve, you know, basically on demand video games, never a use case I would ever have imagined for Linky. And at the previous Kuan, you know, virtually Kuan EU, we had a whole keynote about how Linky was used to combat COVID 19. So all sorts of uses. And it really doesn't, you know, whether, whether it's a small cluster or large cluster it's equally applicable. >>Wow. So as we talk about link D service match, we obviously are gonna talk about security application control, etcetera. But in this climate Software supply chain is critical, right. And as we think about open source software supply chain, talk to us about the recent security audit of link dealer. >>Yeah. So one of the things that we do as part of a CNCF project, and also as part of, I, I think our relationship with our community is we have regular security audits, you know, where we, we engage security professionals who are very thorough and, you know, dig into all the details. Of course the source code is all out there, you know, so anyone can read through the code, but they'll build threat model analyses and things like that. And then we take their, their report and we publish it. We say, Hey, look, here's, you know, here's the situation. So we have earlier reports online, and this newest one was done by a company called trail of bits. And they built a whole threat model and looked through all the different ways that Linky could go wrong. And they always find issues. Of course, you know, it's, it would be very scary, I think, to get a report that was like, no, we didn't find yeah. Earth clean, you know? Yeah. Everything's fine. You know, should be okay. I don't know. Right. But they, you know, they did not find anything critical. They found some issues that we rapidly addressed and then, you know, everything gets written up in the report and, and then we publish it, you know, as part of an open source artifact >>Are, you let's say, you know, do they give you and add something? So if something happens so that you can act on the code before, you know, somebody else discovers the >>Yeah, yeah. They'll give you a preview of what they found. And then often, you know, it's not like you're going before the judge and the judge makes a judgment and then like off the jail, right. It's, it's a dialogue because they don't necessarily understand the project. Well, they definitely don't understand it as well as you do. So you are helping them, you know, understand which parts and, and your, you know, are, are interesting to look at from the security perspective, which parts are not that interesting. They do their own investigation of course, but it's a dialogue the entire time. So you do have an opportunity to say, oh, you told me that was a, a, a minor issue. I actually think that's larger or, or vice versa. You know, you, you think that's a big problem. Actually, we thought about that, and it's not a big problem because of whatever. So it's a collaborative process. >>So link D been around, like, when I first learned about service me link D was the project that I learned about. Yeah. It's been there for a long time, but just mentioned 22,000 clusters. That's just mind boggling pod, 22,000 pods, the pods. Okay. >>Clusters would be >>Great. Yeah. Yeah. Clusters would be great too, but filled 22 thousands pods, big deployment. That's the big deployment of link D but all the way down to the small, smallest set of pods as well. What are some of the recent project updates from of the learnings you bought back from the community and updated the, the project as a result? >>Yeah. So a big one for us, you know, on the topic of security link, a big driver of link adoption is security and, and less on the supply chain side and more on the traffic, like live traffic security. So things like mutual TLS. So you can encrypt the communication between pods and make sure it's authenticated. One of the recent feature additions is authorization policy. So you can lock down connections between services and you can say service a is only allowed to talk to service B. And I wanna do that. Not based on network identity, you know, and not based on like IP addresses, cuz those are spoof. And you know, we've kind of like as an industry moved, moved, we've gotten a little more advanced from that, but actually based on the workload identity, you know, as captured by the mutual TLS certificate exchange. So we give you the ability now to, to, to restrict the types of communication that are allowed to happen on your cluster. >>So, okay. This is what happened. What about the future? Can you give us, you know, into suggestion of what is going to happen in the medium and long term? >>I think we're done, you know, we graduated, so we're just gonna >>Stop there's >>What else is there to do? There's no grad school, you know? No, no. So for us, there's a clear roadmap ahead, continuing down the, the security realm, for sure. We've given you kind of the very first building block, which at the service level, but coming up in, in the two point 12 release, we'll have route based policy as well, as you can say, this service is only allowed to call these three, you know, routes on this end point and we'll be working later to do things like mesh expansion so we can run the data plane outside of Kubernetes. You know, so the control plane will stay in in Kubernetes, but the data plane will, you'll be able to run that on VMs and, and, and things like that. And then of course in the, you know, we're also starting to look at things like I like to make a fun of WAM a lot, but we are actually starting to look at WAM in, in the ways that that might actually be useful for Linky users. >>So we talk a lot about the flexibility of a project, like link D you can do amazing things with it from a security perspective, but we're talking still to a DevOps type cloud of, of, of developers who are spread thin across their skillset. How do you help balance the need for the flexibility, which usually becomes more nerd knobs and servicing a crowd that wants even higher levels of abstraction and simplicity. >>Yeah. Yeah. That's a great question. And this is, this is what makes Linky so unique in the service mesh spaces. We have a laser focus on simplicity and especially on operational simplicity. So our audience, you know, we can make it easy to install Linky, but what we really care about is when you're running it and you're on call for it and it's sitting in this critical, vulnerable part of your infrastructure, do you feel confident in that? Do you feel like you understand it? Do you feel like you can observe it? Do you feel like you can predict what it's gonna do? And so every aspect of Linky is designed to be as operationally simple as possible. So when we deliver features, you know, that's always our, our primary consideration is, you know, we have to reject the urge. You know, we have an urge as, as engineers to like want to build everything, you know, it's an ultimate platform to solve all problems and we have to really be disciplined and say, we're not gonna do that. >>We're gonna look at solving the minimum possible problem with a minimum set of features because we need to keep things simple. And, and then we need to look at the human aspect to that. And I think that's been a part of, of Link's success. And then on the buoyant side, of course, you know, I don't just work on link day. I also work on, on buoyant, which helps organizations adopt Linky and, and increasingly large organizations that are not service mesh experts don't wanna be service mesh experts that, you know, they wanna spend their time and energy developing their business, right. And, and building the business logic that powers their company. So for them, we have actually re recently introduced, fully managed. Linky where we can take on, even though Linky has to run on your cluster, right? The, the, the, the sidecar proxies has to be alongside your application. We can actually take on the operational burden of, of upgrades and trust, anchor rotation, and installation. And you can effectively treat it as a utility, right. And, and, and have a, a hosted, like, experience, even though the, the actual bits, at least most of them, not all of them, most of 'em have to live on your cluster. >>I love the focus of most CNCF projects, you know, it's, it's peanut butter or jelly, not peanut butter. Yeah. Trying to be become jelly. Right. What's the, what's the, what's the peanut butter to link D's jelly. Like where does link D stop and some of the things that customers should really consider yeah. When looking at service mesh. >>Yeah. No, that's a great way of looking at it. And I, I actually think that that philosophy comes from Kubernetes. I think Kubernetes itself, one of the reasons it was so successful is because it had some clearly delineated, it said, this is what we're gonna do. Right. And this is what we're not gonna do. So we're gonna do layer three, four networking. Right. But we're gonna stop there. We're not gonna do anything with layer seven. And that allowed the service mesh. So I guess if I were to go down the, the bread, the bread of the sandwich has Kubernetes, and then Linky is the, is the peanut butter, I guess, and then the jelly, you know, so I think the jelly is every other aspect of, of building a platform. Right. So if you are the, the audience for Linky, most of the time, it's a platform owners, right. They're building a platform, an internal platform for their developers to write code. And so, as part of that, of course, you've got Kubernetes, you've got Linky, but you've also got a C I CD system. You've also got a, you know, a code repository, if it's GitLab or, or GitHub or wherever you've got, you know, other kind of tools that are enforcing various other constraints. All of that is the jelly, you know, in the, this is, analogy's getting complicated now. And like the, the platform sandwich that, you know, that you're serving. >>So talk to us about trans and service mesh from the, from the, as we think of the macro. >>Yeah. Yeah. So, you know, it's been an interesting space because we were talking a little bit about, you know, about this before the show, but the, there was so much buzz, you know, and then what we, what we saw was basically it took two years for that buzz to become actual adoption, you know, and now a lot of the buzz is off on other exciting things. And the people who remain in the Linky space are, are very focused on, oh, I actually have a, a real problem that I need to solve and I need to solve it now. So that's been great. So in terms of broader trends, you know, I think one thing we've seen for sure is the service mesh space is kind of notorious for complexity, you know, and a lot of what we've been doing on the Linky side has been trying to, to reverse that, that, that idea, you know, because it doesn't actually have to be complex. There's interesting stuff you can do, especially when you get into the way we handle the sidecar model. It's actually really, it's a wonderful model operationally. It's really, it feels weird at first. And then you're like, oh, actually this makes my operations a lot easier. So a lot of the trends that I see at least for Linky is doubling down on the sidecar model, trying to make side cards as small and as thin as possible and try and make them, you know, kind of transparent to the rest of the application. So >>Well, William Morgan, one of the coolest Twitter handles I've seen at WM on Twitter, that's actually a really cool Twitter handle. Thank you, CEO of buoyant. Thank you for joining the cube again. Cube alum from Valencia Spain. I'm Keith towns, along with en Rico, and you're watching the cube, the leader in high tech coverage.
SUMMARY :
brought to you by the cloud native computing foundation. the show en people wanting to see, you know, the projects, people that build the projects at We have some amazing builders on the show the beautiful face of the project. Speaking of beautiful face of the project, linker D just graduated from about the project and, you know, wants to talk about it and wants to be involved. So let's talk about the significance of that link D not the only service mesh project out there. And so for us, you know, there was the, the work involved in that was really not any different from the work involved So from the of view of, you know, users adopting the, this technology, 22,000 pods around the world to serve, you know, basically on demand video games, And as we think about open source software supply chain, talk to us about the recent security audit of Of course the source code is all out there, you know, so anyone can read through the code, And then often, you know, it's not like you're going before pod, 22,000 pods, the pods. What are some of the recent project updates from of the learnings you bought back from but actually based on the workload identity, you know, as captured by the mutual TLS Can you give us, you know, into suggestion of what is going to happen in the medium and you know, we're also starting to look at things like I like to make a fun of WAM a lot, but we are actually starting to look at WAM So we talk a lot about the flexibility of a project, like link D you can do amazing So our audience, you know, we can make it easy to install Linky, but what we really care about is when And then on the buoyant side, of course, you know, I love the focus of most CNCF projects, you know, it's, All of that is the jelly, you know, in the, this is, So in terms of broader trends, you know, Thank you for joining the cube
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
William Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Linky | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Valencia Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
22,000 pods | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kubernetes | TITLE | 0.99+ |
22,000 clusters | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this week | DATE | 0.98+ |
22 thousands pods | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
CNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
GitHub | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Xbox | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.94+ |
buoyant | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
Cloudnativecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
link | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
first service | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
link D | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Link | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Coon | ORGANIZATION | 0.88+ |
WM | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
GitLab | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
Spain | LOCATION | 0.86+ |
layer three | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
First impressions | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
linker D | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.84+ | |
Nier D | PERSON | 0.83+ |
Buoyant | PERSON | 0.83+ |
Earth | LOCATION | 0.82+ |
Keith | PERSON | 0.8+ |
COVID 19 | OTHER | 0.78+ |
Kubernetes | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
Kuan | PERSON | 0.73+ |
QAN | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
Rico | LOCATION | 0.7+ |
Kubernetes | PERSON | 0.7+ |
two point | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.68+ |
cloud native con | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
C I | TITLE | 0.67+ |
bits | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
trail | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
layer seven | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
Kubecon | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
22 | EVENT | 0.62+ |
cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.61+ |
vincia | ORGANIZATION | 0.59+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
Morgan McLean & Danielle Greshock | AWS Partner Showcase S1E2
(gentle music) >> Hello, welcome to theCUBE's presentation of the AWS Showcase season one, episode two with the ISV Startups partners. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. We're joined by Morgan McLean, director of product management at Splunk, and Danielle Greshock, who is the director of ISVs solution architects at AWS. Welcome to the show. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks for having us. >> And great. Thanks for having us. >> Great to see both of you, both theCUBE alumni, but the Splunk-AWS relationship has been going very, very well. You guys are doing great business enabling this app revolution. And cloud scale has been going extremely well. So let's get into it. You guys are involved in a lot of action around application revolution, around OpenTelemetry and open source. So let's get into it. What's the latest? >> Danielle, you go ahead. >> Well, I'll just jump in first. Obviously last year, not last year, but in 2020, we launched the AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry. The idea being essentially, we're able to bring in data from partners, from infrastructure running on AWS, from apps running on AWS, to really be able to increase observability across all cloud assets at your entire cloud platform. So, Morgan, if you want to chime in on how Splunk >> Morgan: Certainly. >> has worked out OpenTelemetry. >> Yeah. I mean, OpenTelemetry is super exciting. Obviously, there's a lot of partnership points between Amazon and Splunk, but OpenTelemetry is probably one of them that's the most visible to people who aren't already maybe using these two products together. And so, as Danielle mentioned, Amazon has their own distribution of OpenTelemetry, Splunk has their own, as well, and of course there's the main open source distribution that everybody knows and loves. Just for our viewers, just for clarity's sake, the separate distributions are fundamentally very similar to, almost identical to what's offered in the open source space, but they come preconfigured and they come with support guarantees from each company, meaning that you can actually get paid full support for an open source project, which is really fantastic for customers. And as Danielle mentioned, it's a great demonstration of the alliance between Splunk and Amazon Web Services. For example, the AWS Distro, when you use it, can export data to Amazon CloudWatch, various Amazon backed open source initiatives like Prometheus and others, and to Splunk Observability Cloud and to Splunk Enterprise. So it's a place that we've worked very closely together, and it's something that we're very excited about. >> So, Morgan, I want to get your take on the on the product management side and also how product are built these days. >> One of the big things we're seeing in cloud is that open source has been the big enabler for a lot of refactoring. And you got multiple distributions, but the innovations on top of that, can you talk about how you see the productization of new innovations with open source as you guys go into this market, because this is the new dynamic with cloud. We're seeing examples all over the place. Obviously, Amazon's going next level with what they're doing, and that open source, it's not a one game for all of it. You can have mix and match. Take us through the product angle. >> And in many ways, this is just another wave of the same thing, right? Like, if you think back in time, we all used and still use in many cases, virtual machines, most of those are based on Linux, right? Another large open source project. And so, open source software has been accelerating innovation in the cloud space and in the computing space generally for a very long time, which is fantastic. Our excitement with something like OpenTelemetry comes from both the project's capabilities but also what we can do with it. So for those who aren't already familiar with OpenTelemetry, OpenTelemetry allows you to extract really critical system telemetry, application signals and everything else you need from your own applications, from new services, from your infrastructure, from everything that you're running in a cloud environment. You can then send that data to another location for processing. And so John, you ask like, how does this accelerate innovation? What does it unlock? Well, the insight you can gain from this data means you can become so much more efficient as a development organization. You can make your applications so much more effective because when you send that data to something like Splunk Observability Cloud, to something like Amazon CloudWatch, to various other solutions on the market, they can give you deep, deep insight into your application's performance, to its structure, they can help you reduce outages. And so, it's very, very powerful because it allows organizations to use tools like Splunk, like Amazon, like other things to innovate so much more effectively. >> Danielle, can you comment >> If I could... >> on the AWS side because this is again on the big point. You guys are going next level, and you're starting to see patterns in the ISV world, certainly on the architecture side of partners doing things differently now on top of what they've already done. Could you share how AWS is helping customers accelerate? >> Well, just as Morgan was talking about what OpenTelemetry provides, you can see how from a partnership perspective, this is so valuable, right? What the partner team here at AWS is in the business of doing, is really enabling customer choice, right? And having that ability to plug in and pull data from different sources, post it to different sources, make it available for visibility across all of your resources is very powerful and it's something from the partner community that we really value because we want customers to be able to select best of breed solutions, what works for their business, which businesses are different and they may have different needs, and that also fosters that true innovation. A small company is going to develop and release software a lot differently than a large enterprise. And so, being able to support something like OpenTelemetry just enables that for all different kinds of customers. >> Morgan, add to that because the velocity of releases, certainly operational, stability, is key every predominant security, uptime, these are top concerns. And, you mention data too, >> And you mention challenges. >> You got the data in here. So you got a lot of data moving around, a lot of value. What's your take? >> Yeah. So, I'll speak with some specifics. So a challenge that developers have had for years when you're developing large services, which you can now do with platforms like AWS. So, it's very easy to go develop huge deployments. But a challenge they have is you go and build a mess, right? And like, I've worked earlier in my career in Web Services. And I remember in one of the first orgs I was in, I was one of the five people who really understood our ecommerce stack. Right? And so like, I would get dragged into all these meetings and I'd have to go draw like the 50 services we had, and how they interacted, and the changes that were made in the last week. And without observability tools like Splunk Observability Cloud, like the ones offered by Amazon, like the ones that are backed by the data that comes with OpenTelemetry, organizations basically rely on people like this, to go draw out their deployments so they understand what it is they've built. Well, as you can imagine, this crimps your development velocity, because most of your engineers, most of your tech leads, most of everyone else don't actually understand what it is they've built what it is they're running, because they need that global context. You get something like OpenTelemetry and the solutions that consume the data from it, and suddenly now, all your developers have that context, all of them when they're adding functionality to a service or they're updating their infrastructure, can actually understand how it interacts with the rest of the broader application. This lets you speed up your time to development, this lets you ship more safely, more securely. And finally, when things do go wrong, which will be less frequent, but when they do go wrong, you can fix them super rapidly. >> If I'm a customer, let me ask a question. I'm a customer and I say, "Okay, I love AWS, I love Splunk, I love OpenTelemetry. I got to have open sources, technology innovation is happening." What's the integration? What are some of the standards? Can you take us through how that's working together with you guys as a shared platform? >> Yeah. So let's take the Amazon distribution for OpenTelemetry or even the Splunk one. One of the first things they do is they include all of the receivers, all of the sort of data capture components that you need, out of box for platforms like AWS, right? And so, right away, you get that power and flexibility where you're getting access to all of these data sources, right? And so, that's part of that partnership. And additionally, once the data comes into OpenTelemetry, you can now send that to various different data sources, including, as Danielle mentioned, to multiple at the same time. So you can use whatever tools you want. And so when you talk about like what the partnership is actually providing to you as a customer and still, this is just within the context of OpenTelemetry, obviously there's a much broader partnership between these two companies than just that. But within the context of OpenTelemetry means you can download one of these distributions. It's fully supported. It works with both solutions and everything is just great, right? You don't need to go fiddle with that out of the box. To be clear, OpenTelemetry is a batteries included project, right? This means that even the standard distributions of OpenTelemetry include the components you need. You have to go directly, reference them and ensure that they're packaged in there, but they exist, right. But the nice thing about these distributions is that it's done, it's out of the box, you don't even have to worry about is something missing or do I need to include new exporters or new receivers? It's all there. It's preconfigured. It just works. And if something goes wrong and you have a support contact, you pick up the phone, you talk to someone to get it fixed. >> Danielle, what's the Amazon side 'cause agility and scale is one of the highlights you guys are seeing. How does this tie into that and how are you guys working backwards from the customers to support the partners? >> Well, I think just to add on essentially to what Morgan said, I think that AWS is a cloud platform, has always really had a focus on developers. And, we talk a lot about how AWS and Amazon as a whole really embraces this continuous integration and continuous deployment methods inside of our organization. And we talk about services, and observability is a huge part of that. The only way that you're actually able to release hundreds, thousands of times a day like Amazon does, is by having an observability platform, to be able to measure metrics, see changes in the environment, to be able to roll back if you need to, and to be able to quickly mitigate any challenges or anything that goes wrong at any part of the process. And so, when we preach that to our customers, I think it's something that we do that because we live it and breathe it. And so, things such as OpenTelemetry and such as the products that Splunk builds, those are also ways in which we believe our customers can achieve that. >> Yeah. And we can... I mean, as I mentioned before, this partnership goes well beyond OpenTelemetry, right? And so, if you go use like Splunk Enterprise, Enterprise Cloud, Splunk Observability Cloud, and you're running on AWS, you have excellent support and excellent visibility into your Amazon infrastructure, into the services and applications you've deployed on top of that infrastructure. We try and give you, and I think we do succeed in this. We give you the best possible experience, the deepest possible visibility, into what it is you've deployed on AWS, so that you can be even more successful as a business, and so that you can be even more successful on AWS as a platform. >> Yeah. This is a great conversation, Morgan. You mentioned the early days of Web Services. AWS stands for Amazon Web Services built on web services. So interesting throwback there, but made me think about the days of the early days of web services. And if you look at data, what's going on now, the top partners in AWS, you're seeing a lot of people thinking about data differently, they're refactoring, a lot of machine learning, a lot of AI going on at scale. So then, you got cloud native, things like Kubernetes and these new services being stood up and teared down with automation. A whole new operating model's coming. And so when you think about observability, the importance of it, I mean, can you share your perspective on this whole 'nother level? I mean, I always say that whole another level sounds cliche, but it is next level. I mean, this is completely different. What's your reaction? >> Yeah. There there's a ton of factors here, right? So as you point out, companies are totally shifting how they use their cloud infrastructure. And part of this you see during their cloud migrations, a part of it you see after, and they're shifting from their sort of stateful VMs that they may have had in the past to infrastructure that they tear down and put up regularly. And there's a lot more automation. With this, comes as I mentioned before, complexity, right? And also, with this comes more and more businesses becoming even more reliant on their digital infrastructure. And so, not having observability into your applications, into your services, into your infrastructure, to me, is akin to running a business, say running a large warehousing or distribution company, but not having any idea where you're shipping products or where things are, or not having any accounting or CFO, right? Like, business has become so digital. Business is so reliant on technology, and that's unlocked a ton of new things. It's great. But not having visibility into how that technology works or what it is that's deployed or how to fix it is akin to having no visibility to anything else in your business. It's nuts. And so, observability is super, super critical, particularly for customers who are adopting this new wave of cloud technologies on platforms like AWS. >> Danielle, on your side too, you're enabling this new capability so that businesses can do it, the partners do it, we're calling it super cloud. We've been calling it super cloud kind of dynamic where new things are happening with the data. And you guys are evolving with that. Can you share what you're seeing on your side as your partners start to go to the next level? What are you guys doing? How does it all come together? >> Well, we always talk about what has happened with data in the last couple of years, which the cloud has really enabled around, you know, variety and velocity and there's one other "V" that's escaping me right now, but essentially, all of this data is coming in and providing the ability for us to make better decisions, to build better products, to provide better experiences for customers. And so, I just think, the OpenTelemetry project, as well as what Splunk is doing is just another example of how we're taking this massive amount of data and being able to provide better experiences and outcomes for customers. >> And you guys have been working along together for long time, Splunk, and, it's been a great partners, if we're going back with that been covering it on theCUBE and SiliconANGLE. So, we know that, the change is key observability. Can you imagine a company without a CFO, Morgan? That's just boggles your mind, but that's what it's like right now. So... >> It is, yeah. >> And the people who take advantage of that are winning, right? So it's like, that's the key. >> Yeah, I know. I mean, even in my own career, right, I've moved between different companies. And I remember, when I joined Google in particular, which is where I worked at previously, I was very impressed with their internal observability tools. And I'm certain, I haven't worked at Amazon. I'm certainly, I just assume inside of Amazon they're excellent as well, so a lot of the large cloud firms these days. But it was so refreshing going from an organization where if we had some outage or something went wrong, there were like a very small set of people who could actually understand what was going on. And then you would just have to manually dive through logs and correlate requests manually between services. It's very challenging. And so, when things went wrong, they went wrong for a long, long time. And so, the companies that understood this even in the past are already very successful as a result. I think now, the rest of the industry is really in the midst of adopting these observability practices and the tools that are required to implement them, because you're right. Otherwise your development velocity slows down. Now you're getting out competed by your competition. And then, when you have a problem, it blows up for ages. And once again, your competition can take advantage of it. >> And, can you just summarize the observability piece relative to the OpenTelemetry? Where is that going to go? Where do you see that evolving? >> Sure. >> I see open source is growing like crazy, we all know that. >> Of course. >> But OpenTelemetry in particular and open source, 'cause this is a big hot area. >> Yes. So to set the stage for people, OpenTelemetry, unlocks observability in many ways. As I mentioned earlier, OpenTelemetry is how you capture data out of your application. It doesn't process it. It's not a replacement for something like Amazon CloudWatch or any Splunk's products, but it's how we get the data out of your system, which is a remarkably difficult problem. I won't dive into it today, but, those who work in this space are very aware. That's why this project exists and it's so big, that actually extracting information, metrics, logs, distributed traces, profiles, everything else, from your applications and from your infrastructure is very, very difficult. So for OpenTelemetry, where it's going is just continually getting better at extracting more types of data from more sources, and doing that more effectively for people in a more standardized way. That will unlock firms like Splunk, firms, like Amazon and others to better process this data. In terms of where that's going, the sky's the limit, right? Like, everyone's familiar with APM, people are familiar with infrastructure monitoring, but there's a lot more capabilities coming there for security analytics, for network performance monitoring, for getting down all the way to single lines of coding your application, how they impact everything. There's just so much power that's coming to the industry right now. I'm really excited to see where things go in the next few years. >> And Danielle, you're in the middle of all the action as a solution architect, really set the stage for their companies and the ISVs, and this is a big, hot area. What are the patterns you're seeing and what are some of the best practices that you're doing will help companies? >> Right. So I think, summarizing our entire conversation, the big things that we're seeing in the market is essentially more and more companies are looking to move to a continuous deployment and a continuous integration environment. And they're looking to innovate faster and spend less time hot patching or hot fixing their environments and they want to spend more time innovating. And so, that you know, the patterns that we're seeing is... What I see and what I actually experience firsthand at re:Invent when I talk to probably over 40 or 50 ISVs, is customers want to know in their environment, where are their changes? Where are their security vulnerabilities? Where are their data changes, and what are customers really experiencing, whether it's latency, poor experience throughout their products, those types of things? So security, data, and observability are just key to all of that experience and that's what we're definitely seeing as patterns, what we're seeing with our customers and also what value our ISVs are providing in that space. >> That's awesome. And the other thing I would observe is that there's more of an integration story going on around joint projects, whether it's open source. >> Absolutely. >> Because this is where we want to get that services connected. And it's mutual beneficial. I mean, this is really >> Exactly. >> whole 'nother, new kind of interoperable cloud scale. >> Yeah, if I could say one thing else there, I think that, a lot of the customers who are trying to move into the cloud now are, maybe not technology forward companies and they really need that solution. And that's very important. I think COVID has pushed a lot of companies into the cloud maybe very quickly. And, that has been something else we've observed in the market. So, solutions and full solutions between ISVs and ISVs, or ISVs and AWS is just becoming more and more common thing that we see. >> And, you mentioned John, in the open source space as well. Like, we're certainly from Amazon to Splunk. So we're talking a lot about those, but there's a lot of other firms involved in projects like OpenTelemetry. And I think it's very endearing, very heartening to see how well they cooperate in this community and how, when their interests are aligned, how effective they can be. And it's been very exciting to work in the space and very pleasant, honestly, to see everything come together with this huge set of customers and partners. >> Yeah. The pleasant surprise of the pandemic has been that people come into the cloud and they like it and they, "Hey, this works," and they double down on it. Then they realize, there's more there and they refactor. So, you're seeing real examples of that. So, this is a great discussion, great success story. Congratulations Morgan, Danielle. >> Thank you. >> Great partnership between Splunk and AWS. We've been following for a long time. And again, this highlights this whole another level of integrating super cloud kind of experience where people are getting more capabilities and doing more together, so great stuff. >> And this is just one facet of that, right? Like, there's all the other connections of Splunk Enterprise, Splunk security analytics products, and others. It's a deep, deep partnership between these firms. >> Yeah. And the companies that innovate and get that new capability are going to have an advantage. And you're seeing... >> Yes. >> Right? >> Agreed. >> And this is awesome, and great stuff, thank you for coming on and sharing that insight. >> Thank you. >> Congratulations Morgan over there at Splunk, great stuff. And Danielle, thanks for coming on and sharing the AWS perspective. >> Thanks for having me. >> And you guys are going to the next level. You moving up to stack as they say, all good stuff for customers. Thanks. >> Thank you. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> This is season one, episode two of the AWS Partner Showcase. I'm John Furrier with theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
of the AWS Showcase And great. but the Splunk-AWS relationship So, Morgan, if you want it's a great demonstration of the alliance on the on the product management side One of the big things Well, the insight you on the AWS side And having that ability to plug in the velocity of releases, You got the data in here. and the changes that were What are some of the standards? is actually providing to you as a customer from the customers to to be able to roll back if you need to, and so that you can be And so when you think about observability, And part of this you see And you guys are evolving with that. and providing the ability for And you guys have been And the people who And so, the companies that is growing like crazy, 'cause this is a big hot area. OpenTelemetry is how you capture data What are the patterns you're seeing And so, that you know, And the other thing I I mean, this is really new kind of interoperable cloud scale. into the cloud maybe very quickly. And I think it's very has been that people come into the cloud And again, this highlights And this is just one And the companies that innovate And this is awesome, and great stuff, and sharing the AWS perspective. And you guys are of the AWS Partner Showcase.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Danielle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Danielle Greshock | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Morgan McLean | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ISV | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
OpenTelemetry | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both solutions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Prometheus | TITLE | 0.98+ |
ISVs | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.98+ |
SiliconANGLE | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Morgan McLean, Splunk & Danielle Greshock, AWS | AWS Partner Showcase
(gentle music) >> Hello, welcome to theCUBE's presentation of the AWS Showcase season one, episode two with the ISV Startups partners. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE. We're joined by Morgan McLean, director of product management at Splunk, and Danielle Greshock, who is the director of ISVs solution architects at AWS. Welcome to the show. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks for having us. >> And great. Thanks for having us. >> Great to see both of you, both theCUBE alumni, but the Splunk-AWS relationship has been going very, very well. You guys are doing great business enabling this app revolution. And cloud scale has been going extremely well. So let's get into it. You guys are involved in a lot of action around application revolution, around OpenTelemetry and open source. So let's get into it. What's the latest? >> Danielle, you go ahead. >> Well, I'll just jump in first. Obviously last year, not last year, but in 2020, we launched the AWS Distro for OpenTelemetry. The idea being essentially, we're able to bring in data from partners, from infrastructure running on AWS, from apps running on AWS, to really be able to increase observability across all cloud assets at your entire cloud platform. So, Morgan, if you want to chime in on how Splunk >> Morgan: Certainly. >> has worked out OpenTelemetry. >> Yeah. I mean, OpenTelemetry is super exciting. Obviously, there's a lot of partnership points between Amazon and Splunk, but OpenTelemetry is probably one of them that's the most visible to people who aren't already maybe using these two products together. And so, as Danielle mentioned, Amazon has their own distribution of OpenTelemetry, Splunk has their own, as well, and of course there's the main open source distribution that everybody knows and loves. Just for our viewers, just for clarity's sake, the separate distributions are fundamentally very similar to, almost identical to what's offered in the open source space, but they come preconfigured and they come with support guarantees from each company, meaning that you can actually get paid full support for an open source project, which is really fantastic for customers. And as Danielle mentioned, it's a great demonstration of the alliance between Splunk and Amazon Web Services. For example, the AWS Distro, when you use it, can export data to Amazon CloudWatch, various Amazon backed open source initiatives like Prometheus and others, and to Splunk Observability Cloud and to Splunk Enterprise. So it's a place that we've worked very closely together, and it's something that we're very excited about. >> So, Morgan, I want to get your take on the on the product management side and also how product are built these days. >> One of the big things we're seeing in cloud is that open source has been the big enabler for a lot of refactoring. And you got multiple distributions, but the innovations on top of that, can you talk about how you see the productization of new innovations with open source as you guys go into this market, because this is the new dynamic with cloud. We're seeing examples all over the place. Obviously, Amazon's going next level with what they're doing, and that open source, it's not a one game for all of it. You can have mix and match. Take us through the product angle. >> And in many ways, this is just another wave of the same thing, right? Like, if you think back in time, we all used and still use in many cases, virtual machines, most of those are based on Linux, right? Another large open source project. And so, open source software has been accelerating innovation in the cloud space and in the computing space generally for a very long time, which is fantastic. Our excitement with something like OpenTelemetry comes from both the project's capabilities but also what we can do with it. So for those who aren't already familiar with OpenTelemetry, OpenTelemetry allows you to extract really critical system telemetry, application signals and everything else you need from your own applications, from new services, from your infrastructure, from everything that you're running in a cloud environment. You can then send that data to another location for processing. And so John, you ask like, how does this accelerate innovation? What does it unlock? Well, the insight you can gain from this data means you can become so much more efficient as a development organization. You can make your applications so much more effective because when you send that data to something like Splunk Observability Cloud, to something like Amazon CloudWatch, to various other solutions on the market, they can give you deep, deep insight into your application's performance, to its structure, they can help you reduce outages. And so, it's very, very powerful because it allows organizations to use tools like Splunk, like Amazon, like other things to innovate so much more effectively. >> Danielle, can you comment >> If I could... >> on the AWS side because this is again on the big point. You guys are going next level, and you're starting to see patterns in the ISV world, certainly on the architecture side of partners doing things differently now on top of what they've already done. Could you share how AWS is helping customers accelerate? >> Well, just as Morgan was talking about what OpenTelemetry provides, you can see how from a partnership perspective, this is so valuable, right? What the partner team here at AWS is in the business of doing, is really enabling customer choice, right? And having that ability to plug in and pull data from different sources, post it to different sources, make it available for visibility across all of your resources is very powerful and it's something from the partner community that we really value because we want customers to be able to select best of breed solutions, what works for their business, which businesses are different and they may have different needs, and that also fosters that true innovation. A small company is going to develop and release software a lot differently than a large enterprise. And so, being able to support something like OpenTelemetry just enables that for all different kinds of customers. >> Morgan, add to that because the velocity of releases, certainly operational, stability, is key every predominant security, uptime, these are top concerns. And, you mention data too, >> And you mention challenges. >> You got the data in here. So you got a lot of data moving around, a lot of value. What's your take? >> Yeah. So, I'll speak with some specifics. So a challenge that developers have had for years when you're developing large services, which you can now do with platforms like AWS. So, it's very easy to go develop huge deployments. But a challenge they have is you go and build a mess, right? And like, I've worked earlier in my career in Web Services. And I remember in one of the first orgs I was in, I was one of the five people who really understood our ecommerce stack. Right? And so like, I would get dragged into all these meetings and I'd have to go draw like the 50 services we had, and how they interacted, and the changes that were made in the last week. And without observability tools like Splunk Observability Cloud, like the ones offered by Amazon, like the ones that are backed by the data that comes with OpenTelemetry, organizations basically rely on people like this, to go draw out their deployments so they understand what it is they've built. Well, as you can imagine, this crimps your development velocity, because most of your engineers, most of your tech leads, most of everyone else don't actually understand what it is they've built what it is they're running, because they need that global context. You get something like OpenTelemetry and the solutions that consume the data from it, and suddenly now, all your developers have that context, all of them when they're adding functionality to a service or they're updating their infrastructure, can actually understand how it interacts with the rest of the broader application. This lets you speed up your time to development, this lets you ship more safely, more securely. And finally, when things do go wrong, which will be less frequent, but when they do go wrong, you can fix them super rapidly. >> If I'm a customer, let me ask a question. I'm a customer and I say, "Okay, I love AWS, I love Splunk, I love OpenTelemetry. I got to have open sources, technology innovation is happening." What's the integration? What are some of the standards? Can you take us through how that's working together with you guys as a shared platform? >> Yeah. So let's take the Amazon distribution for OpenTelemetry or even the Splunk one. One of the first things they do is they include all of the receivers, all of the sort of data capture components that you need, out of box for platforms like AWS, right? And so, right away, you get that power and flexibility where you're getting access to all of these data sources, right? And so, that's part of that partnership. And additionally, once the data comes into OpenTelemetry, you can now send that to various different data sources, including, as Danielle mentioned, to multiple at the same time. So you can use whatever tools you want. And so when you talk about like what the partnership is actually providing to you as a customer and still, this is just within the context of OpenTelemetry, obviously there's a much broader partnership between these two companies than just that. But within the context of OpenTelemetry means you can download one of these distributions. It's fully supported. It works with both solutions and everything is just great, right? You don't need to go fiddle with that out of the box. To be clear, OpenTelemetry is a batteries included project, right? This means that even the standard distributions of OpenTelemetry include the components you need. You have to go directly, reference them and ensure that they're packaged in there, but they exist, right. But the nice thing about these distributions is that it's done, it's out of the box, you don't even have to worry about is something missing or do I need to include new exporters or new receivers? It's all there. It's preconfigured. It just works. And if something goes wrong and you have a support contact, you pick up the phone, you talk to someone to get it fixed. >> Danielle, what's the Amazon side 'cause agility and scale is one of the highlights you guys are seeing. How does this tie into that and how are you guys working backwards from the customers to support the partners? >> Well, I think just to add on essentially to what Morgan said, I think that AWS is a cloud platform, has always really had a focus on developers. And, we talk a lot about how AWS and Amazon as a whole really embraces this continuous integration and continuous deployment methods inside of our organization. And we talk about services, and observability is a huge part of that. The only way that you're actually able to release hundreds, thousands of times a day like Amazon does, is by having an observability platform, to be able to measure metrics, see changes in the environment, to be able to roll back if you need to, and to be able to quickly mitigate any challenges or anything that goes wrong at any part of the process. And so, when we preach that to our customers, I think it's something that we do that because we live it and breathe it. And so, things such as OpenTelemetry and such as the products that Splunk builds, those are also ways in which we believe our customers can achieve that. >> Yeah. And we can... I mean, as I mentioned before, this partnership goes well beyond OpenTelemetry, right? And so, if you go use like Splunk Enterprise, Enterprise Cloud, Splunk Observability Cloud, and you're running on AWS, you have excellent support and excellent visibility into your Amazon infrastructure, into the services and applications you've deployed on top of that infrastructure. We try and give you, and I think we do succeed in this. We give you the best possible experience, the deepest possible visibility, into what it is you've deployed on AWS, so that you can be even more successful as a business, and so that you can be even more successful on AWS as a platform. >> Yeah. This is a great conversation, Morgan. You mentioned the early days of Web Services. AWS stands for Amazon Web Services built on web services. So interesting throwback there, but made me think about the days of the early days of web services. And if you look at data, what's going on now, the top partners in AWS, you're seeing a lot of people thinking about data differently, they're refactoring, a lot of machine learning, a lot of AI going on at scale. So then, you got cloud native, things like Kubernetes and these new services being stood up and teared down with automation. A whole new operating model's coming. And so when you think about observability, the importance of it, I mean, can you share your perspective on this whole 'nother level? I mean, I always say that whole another level sounds cliche, but it is next level. I mean, this is completely different. What's your reaction? >> Yeah. There there's a ton of factors here, right? So as you point out, companies are totally shifting how they use their cloud infrastructure. And part of this you see during their cloud migrations, a part of it you see after, and they're shifting from their sort of stateful VMs that they may have had in the past to infrastructure that they tear down and put up regularly. And there's a lot more automation. With this, comes as I mentioned before, complexity, right? And also, with this comes more and more businesses becoming even more reliant on their digital infrastructure. And so, not having observability into your applications, into your services, into your infrastructure, to me, is akin to running a business, say running a large warehousing or distribution company, but not having any idea where you're shipping products or where things are, or not having any accounting or CFO, right? Like, business has become so digital. Business is so reliant on technology, and that's unlocked a ton of new things. It's great. But not having visibility into how that technology works or what it is that's deployed or how to fix it is akin to having no visibility to anything else in your business. It's nuts. And so, observability is super, super critical, particularly for customers who are adopting this new wave of cloud technologies on platforms like AWS. >> Danielle, on your side too, you're enabling this new capability so that businesses can do it, the partners do it, we're calling it super cloud. We've been calling it super cloud kind of dynamic where new things are happening with the data. And you guys are evolving with that. Can you share what you're seeing on your side as your partners start to go to the next level? What are you guys doing? How does it all come together? >> Well, we always talk about what has happened with data in the last couple of years, which the cloud has really enabled around, you know, variety and velocity and there's one other "V" that's escaping me right now, but essentially, all of this data is coming in and providing the ability for us to make better decisions, to build better products, to provide better experiences for customers. And so, I just think, the OpenTelemetry project, as well as what Splunk is doing is just another example of how we're taking this massive amount of data and being able to provide better experiences and outcomes for customers. >> And you guys have been working along together for long time, Splunk, and, it's been a great partners, if we're going back with that been covering it on theCUBE and SiliconANGLE. So, we know that, the change is key observability. Can you imagine a company without a CFO, Morgan? That's just boggles your mind, but that's what it's like right now. So... >> It is, yeah. >> And the people who take advantage of that are winning, right? So it's like, that's the key. >> Yeah, I know. I mean, even in my own career, right, I've moved between different companies. And I remember, when I joined Google in particular, which is where I worked at previously, I was very impressed with their internal observability tools. And I'm certain, I haven't worked at Amazon. I'm certainly, I just assume inside of Amazon they're excellent as well, so a lot of the large cloud firms these days. But it was so refreshing going from an organization where if we had some outage or something went wrong, there were like a very small set of people who could actually understand what was going on. And then you would just have to manually dive through logs and correlate requests manually between services. It's very challenging. And so, when things went wrong, they went wrong for a long, long time. And so, the companies that understood this even in the past are already very successful as a result. I think now, the rest of the industry is really in the midst of adopting these observability practices and the tools that are required to implement them, because you're right. Otherwise your development velocity slows down. Now you're getting out competed by your competition. And then, when you have a problem, it blows up for ages. And once again, your competition can take advantage of it. >> And, can you just summarize the observability piece relative to the OpenTelemetry? Where is that going to go? Where do you see that evolving? >> Sure. >> I see open source is growing like crazy, we all know that. >> Of course. >> But OpenTelemetry in particular and open source, 'cause this is a big hot area. >> Yes. So to set the stage for people, OpenTelemetry, unlocks observability in many ways. As I mentioned earlier, OpenTelemetry is how you capture data out of your application. It doesn't process it. It's not a replacement for something like Amazon CloudWatch or any Splunk's products, but it's how we get the data out of your system, which is a remarkably difficult problem. I won't dive into it today, but, those who work in this space are very aware. That's why this project exists and it's so big, that actually extracting information, metrics, logs, distributed traces, profiles, everything else, from your applications and from your infrastructure is very, very difficult. So for OpenTelemetry, where it's going is just continually getting better at extracting more types of data from more sources, and doing that more effectively for people in a more standardized way. That will unlock firms like Splunk, firms, like Amazon and others to better process this data. In terms of where that's going, the sky's the limit, right? Like, everyone's familiar with APM, people are familiar with infrastructure monitoring, but there's a lot more capabilities coming there for security analytics, for network performance monitoring, for getting down all the way to single lines of coding your application, how they impact everything. There's just so much power that's coming to the industry right now. I'm really excited to see where things go in the next few years. >> And Danielle, you're in the middle of all the action as a solution architect, really set the stage for their companies and the ISVs, and this is a big, hot area. What are the patterns you're seeing and what are some of the best practices that you're doing will help companies? >> Right. So I think, summarizing our entire conversation, the big things that we're seeing in the market is essentially more and more companies are looking to move to a continuous deployment and a continuous integration environment. And they're looking to innovate faster and spend less time hot patching or hot fixing their environments and they want to spend more time innovating. And so, that you know, the patterns that we're seeing is... What I see and what I actually experience firsthand at re:Invent when I talk to probably over 40 or 50 ISVs, is customers want to know in their environment, where are their changes? Where are their security vulnerabilities? Where are their data changes, and what are customers really experiencing, whether it's latency, poor experience throughout their products, those types of things? So security, data, and observability are just key to all of that experience and that's what we're definitely seeing as patterns, what we're seeing with our customers and also what value our ISVs are providing in that space. >> That's awesome. And the other thing I would observe is that there's more of an integration story going on around joint projects, whether it's open source. >> Absolutely. >> Because this is where we want to get that services connected. And it's mutual beneficial. I mean, this is really >> Exactly. >> whole 'nother, new kind of interoperable cloud scale. >> Yeah, if I could say one thing else there, I think that, a lot of the customers who are trying to move into the cloud now are, maybe not technology forward companies and they really need that solution. And that's very important. I think COVID has pushed a lot of companies into the cloud maybe very quickly. And, that has been something else we've observed in the market. So, solutions and full solutions between ISVs and ISVs, or ISVs and AWS is just becoming more and more common thing that we see. >> And, you mentioned John, in the open source space as well. Like, we're certainly from Amazon to Splunk. So we're talking a lot about those, but there's a lot of other firms involved in projects like OpenTelemetry. And I think it's very endearing, very heartening to see how well they cooperate in this community and how, when their interests are aligned, how effective they can be. And it's been very exciting to work in the space and very pleasant, honestly, to see everything come together with this huge set of customers and partners. >> Yeah. The pleasant surprise of the pandemic has been that people come into the cloud and they like it and they, "Hey, this works," and they double down on it. Then they realize, there's more there and they refactor. So, you're seeing real examples of that. So, this is a great discussion, great success story. Congratulations Morgan, Danielle. >> Thank you. >> Great partnership between Splunk and AWS. We've been following for a long time. And again, this highlights this whole another level of integrating super cloud kind of experience where people are getting more capabilities and doing more together, so great stuff. >> And this is just one facet of that, right? Like, there's all the other connections of Splunk Enterprise, Splunk security analytics products, and others. It's a deep, deep partnership between these firms. >> Yeah. And the companies that innovate and get that new capability are going to have an advantage. And you're seeing... >> Yes. >> Right? >> Agreed. >> And this is awesome, and great stuff, thank you for coming on and sharing that insight. >> Thank you. >> Congratulations Morgan over there at Splunk, great stuff. And Danielle, thanks for coming on and sharing the AWS perspective. >> Thanks for having me. >> And you guys are going to the next level. You moving up to stack as they say, all good stuff for customers. Thanks. >> Thank you. >> Okay. >> Thank you. >> This is season one, episode two of the AWS Partner Showcase. I'm John Furrier with theCUBE. Thanks for watching. (gentle music)
SUMMARY :
of the AWS Showcase And great. but the Splunk-AWS relationship So, Morgan, if you want it's a great demonstration of the alliance on the on the product management side One of the big things Well, the insight you on the AWS side And having that ability to plug in the velocity of releases, You got the data in here. and the changes that were What are some of the standards? is actually providing to you as a customer from the customers to to be able to roll back if you need to, and so that you can be And so when you think about observability, And part of this you see And you guys are evolving with that. and providing the ability for And you guys have been And the people who And so, the companies that is growing like crazy, 'cause this is a big hot area. OpenTelemetry is how you capture data What are the patterns you're seeing And so, that you know, And the other thing I I mean, this is really new kind of interoperable cloud scale. into the cloud maybe very quickly. And I think it's very has been that people come into the cloud And again, this highlights And this is just one And the companies that innovate And this is awesome, and great stuff, and sharing the AWS perspective. And you guys are of the AWS Partner Showcase.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Danielle | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Danielle Greshock | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Morgan McLean | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
five people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ISV | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
OpenTelemetry | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both solutions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Prometheus | TITLE | 0.98+ |
ISVs | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Linux | TITLE | 0.98+ |
SiliconANGLE | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Splunk | PERSON | 0.97+ |
Matt Morgan, VMware | AWS re:Invent 2021
(upbeat intro jingle) >> 'Kay, welcome back everyone to theCUBE's coverage of AWS re:Invent, 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE, with your Matt Morgan, Vice President of Cloud Infrastructure Business Group of VMware, CUBE alumni. Matt, great to see you. Can't wait to see you in person, but thanks for coming in remotely for the virtual now hybrid CUBE for re:Invent. >> It's good to see you too, John. Thanks for having us. You know, it's our ninth year covering re:Invented, Remember the first year we went there, it was all developers, right? >> Right. >> And reminds me of the story that you guys have with AWS, you know, VMware Cloud, and VMware with vSphere pioneered operations in IT, you know, vSphere workloads, but now you move that all in the cloud. I remember Ragu when he announced that deal with Pat Gelsinger and Andy Jassy, we covered it extensively. People were like "What are they doing here? This is interesting". Boy- >> Yeah, you- >> The pundits all get it wrong. Their relationship has been blossoming. It's been really powerful, take us through the history here. >> Thanks, John, I mean, you're absolutely right. We have a phenomenal relationship with Amazon Web Services. The value of our partnership has been realized by customers all over the world, in every industry, as they embrace the seamless hybrid cloud experience powered by VMware, vSphere, and of course VM-ware Cloud Stack. Of course, we've recently expanded our operations here, including Japan and the launch of the Soccer Regions. And we're fully open for business with the U.S. Federal Government with VMware Cloud on AWS Gov Cloud. There's strong alignment across the field with new go-to-market teams on both sides and a powerful resell agreement that enables AWS sellers to take VMware Cloud on AWS and all the associated VMware services, such as VMware cloud disaster recovery, NSX vRealize Cloud Management, to their enterprise customers. And we couldn't be doing better. >> Yeah, and you brought up a lot of things there. You mentioned Outpost, mentioned Gov Cloud, you mentioned Marketplace, which means you mentioned the acronym, which is basically, I think it's called EDP Credits, which essentially the enterprise, Amazon's Salesforce working together. So, essentially full business model and technical integrations with Amazon. So, success certainly being demonstrated there. So congratulations, that being said, there's still more to do. We got this whole big wave coming on, you see the edge, you seeing multicloud, you seeing hybrid becoming the operational model, both on premises and in the cloud. And so, customers really are asking themselves "Okay, I got VMware, I got AWS Cloud, I got to secure these clouds now. I got to start putting the business model together on top of the technical architecture". You know, microservices, Kubernetes, Tansu, all the things you guys are doing, but customers want to ask you "What about securing the cloud?", this is the number one question, what's your reaction to that? >> Yeah, it's a great topic, John, at the end of the day, this is about evolving the hybrid cloud. And if you think about it, originally, the hybrid cloud was about unifying both infrastructure and operations between the on-premises world, and the public cloud world. And now what's happening, is we are seeing people embrace that in spades, and as a result of that, their Tier 1 applications are running both on-premises and in the public cloud. And with our new announced local cloud capabilities with VMware Cloud on AWS Outpost, it's leading to this whole new enterprise architecture, which we call the distributed cloud. When you look at deploying enterprise applications in a distributed cloud environment, the conversation starts with consistent networking and importantly security. So, let's talk about that for a moment. Customers are asking us "How do we secure our data when we start having infrastructure in a variety of locations? Are our applications and networks... Are they really secure when they run in these completely different environments? And importantly, when we move an application, we take it from our on-premise data center, we move it to the public cloud are the security policies... Are they moving with it? Do I need to re-architect for that?". And the real question, all of this boils down to "Are we expanding that attack surface when we move to VMware Cloud on AWS?". And so we have to come back to what do we do here to really alleviate these concerns? With data security, it's all about encryption, universal insights. We have the super root capability within our platform to ensure that everything is measured, every message from an application, every data, it's great for Chain Of Custody, Audit. Of course we have backup DR Ransomware. On the application side, of course, segmentation is super important with application centric firewalls, VPNs, tunneling, EDR, IDS, IPS. And of course, none of that matters if you have to reset everything up every time an application moves. And this is a real unique value proposition for us, it's about portability. We deliver portable security. We can move an application, the APIs are standard. You can move it up to the public cloud, your policies, your integrations, even if it's third-party integrations, they're maintained. And that really delivers the ability to say "Look, we can make sure your attack surface is not expanding, it's a controlled environment for you". And that really shrinks the risk factors associated with moving to this distributed cloud environment. >> You know, that's the really, I think the key point, I think that you brought up this infrastructure, kind of, table stakes. Which keeps rising because security's, honestly is now there's no... There's a huge... There's no perimeter. It's huge surface area. Everything has to be secured and locked down. And the big theme at re:Invent this year is data, right? So, you know, data and security all go hand in hand. And so that brings up the aspect of the edge. The edge is now booming, you seeing 5G again, you're here hearing it here at reinvent again, more and more 5G. You mentioned local services, Outpost is evolving. This is kind of the new area, and certainly, attack factor as well. So, you mentioned this whole local services. Take me through that because this becomes interesting because this is an architectural issue for enterprises to figure out, "Okay, I got to distribute a computing architecture, it's called The Cloud and multiple clouds. Now, I've got this edge, whole 'nother opening opens up the case for the architecture conversation". What's the strategy? How do you guys view the case? How do you make the case for local services? >> So, we were super excited to announce VMware Cloud on AWS Outpost. This is a local cloud as a service offering. So, let me break that down a little bit. Of course, compute at the edge is nothing new, but the problem with traditional approaches is typically edge locations may lack IT excellence. Which means there's no one there to manage the service. VMware Cloud on AWS outposts is that local cloud as a service, meaning it's fully managed and at the edge, that's a perfect fit. It's hand in glove for those types of workloads that are out, pushed all the way out, whether it's part of an agricultural deployment or an energy production facility or retail store, where there isn't that typical IT excellence. VMware cloud on AWS outposts enables customers to deploy the same Cloud instance as they're running VMware Cloud on AWS, but be able to do it out at that edge environment. And when you look at the overall value of VMware Cloud on AWS Outpost, it's about delivering a simpler, cost effective, consistent cloud experience for those on-prem environments that matches the operating model of the public cloud. Think of the places that you really want to have cloud infrastructure, where it's critical. Going back to your point on data, getting real time insights on that data, to be able to process that, we call those perishable insights. The value is the immediacy understanding that value specific to the moment it's being captured. Think about the different types of sensor environments, where data's coming off expensive equipment, that's measuring temperature and speed. Understanding that value back to the operator - really, really important. You don't have time to pipe that data up to a cloud process and send the results back down. Edge environments require that real-time stuff. So, together with AWS, we jointly deliver a fully managed service right down to the AWS hardware on which we built the VMware cloud instance. We think about where we're seeing the most interest here. You can look across all kinds of industries and use cases, and we're seeing it specifically in healthcare, out of the hospital, manufacturing for equipment monitoring, government, higher education, where those end points are typically virtualized. There are others, but these are the big ones so far. >> You know, I was just talking to an AMD executive or product marketing person on the gaming side. And they're living this right now because they're putting all the virtual collaboration in the cloud, all the data, because they have so much data and they have so much need for these special instances, whether it's GPUs, and CPUs, a mix and match. So, as instances become more special purposed, that's going to enable them to have more productivity. But then, when you have that baseline in the cloud, the edge also has processing power. So, I think people are starting to see this notion of "Okay, I'm in the cloud, but I can also have that cloud edge without moving data back to the centralized cloud and processing it at the edge with software". >> Yeah, that's true. >> This is real. >> It's super real. And the one that really resonates with customers, is one that we all understand and that's healthcare. Anytime you're in a regional environment where you're at a hospital, think of an ICU, the criticality of that data being processed, providing the insights, this is more mission critical than any other environment, because we're dealing with human lives, think about the complex compute requirements of that environment. And then look at the beauty and elegance of this system, a cloud-based system on premises, doing that compute, providing those insights, giving reality back to the clinician, so they can make those decisions. Healthcare is super, super important. And we see customers across the spectrum, looking at what's happening at the edge and embracing it, whether it's healthcare or other industries. And again, it's a perfect fit for them. >> Yeah, real quick, before we move on to what's new, I'm want to get to that, the Tansu stuff as well. What other industries are popping out? Obviously, manufacturing. What can you talk with some industries and some verticals that are really primed for this local cloud service? >> So, let's talk about manufacturing for a moment. Manufacturing is another facility oriented compute requirement that is perfectly fit, from a system and solution way like VMware cloud on AWS Outposts. Within the manufacturing environment, there's tons of very critical machines. There's inventory management, there's a combination of time management, people management, bringing it all together to ensure that process lines are moving as required, that inventory is provided at the specific moment it's needed, and to make sure that everything, especially in today's supply chain world is provided when is required. This type of capability allows an organization to bring in that sensor data, bring in that inventory data, produce applications that manage that in real time, delivering that compute. And in the manufacturing floor, again, limited IT excellence. So, this provides that capability. Another one is energy production. Think about energy production that's out in the field in North Dakota, or out on an oil rig that might be in the Gulf of Mexico. Not only are you dealing with lack of IT excellence, you're also dealing with limited connectivity. This equipment needs to be monitored and censored and the data from those sensors help drive critical decisions. And with limited connectivity, I mean, you may not even have an LTE signal, the need to do that real time is paramount, local cloud provides that. >> Yeah, and I'd also just add, because we're going to move on, but higher ED is going to be completely transformed. Well, I think that's going to be kind of like a pleat revamp. Let's get into what's new on VMware Cloud on AWS give us the update on the new things that people should know about. That's important that they should review, take us through that, what's new? >> Yeah, absolutely. So, the first is the integration with the AWS console. This is a big thing that we're delivering because VMware Cloud on AWS is a native service of AWS. I have to kind of say that twice, it's a native service of AWS. And because of that, we get the same operational and commerce experience for VMware Cloud instances as customers do with traditional AWS services. This means customers now have a choice between AWS centric operating model, which is highly relevant to DevOps and developers, or VMware centric operating model, which is very relevant to traditional operators, and IT users. VMware Cloud on AWS Gov Cloud is expanded to the U.S., East Virginia Region, and achieved aisle five certification. This new region will make the service more relevant for the Eastern Seaboard where much of the Federal Government resides. And of course with aisle five, it opens up VMware Cloud on AWS to the U.S. military and defense contractors, which is huge because there's massive cloud transformation contracts currently in play. And of course, VMware Cloud on AWS Gov Cloud provides the most secure enterprise cloud for those DOD customers, especially when they focus on those critical Tier 1 workloads. >> It's been three years since the GA of the VMware cloud on AWS, has been earlier, since you announced it> You're pumping on all cylinders, as we had predicted, others didn't, just FYI for the folks watching. What's the final vibe? End the segment with your view of what's going on with VMware Cloud on AWS? What's the bumper sticker? >> So, at the end of the day, every customer is looking to migrate and modernize their workloads. And VMWare cloud gives them that capability to do it faster than anyone else. Customers take their applications, tier 1 applications, move it to that secure distributed cloud construct, that idea of having VMware Cloud on AWS, sharing all those security policies, all of that consistent infrastructure and operations. And then they can modernize those applications, using all of those cloud services and the ability to use Tansu to containerize where applicable. We're excited about these capabilities, and our customers are adopting it faster each and every year. And we're thrilled about the traction we're had. And we're thrilled about the partnership we have with Amazon Web Services. So, lots more to come in this space. >> Lot of great stuff, people moving up the stack on the cloud, you're seeing more refactoring in the cloud. Matt Morgan, great to see you. We've been talking 'about this for years on theCUBE. Great to come on and give some insights. All happening. Infrastructure is code. And everyone's winning with containers and microservices. So, great stuff. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks a lot, John, take care. >> Okay, Matt Morgan, the VP of Cloud Infrastructure Business Group of VMware. This theCUBE's coverage of AWS re:Invent, 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (upbeat outro jingle)
SUMMARY :
remotely for the virtual It's good to see you too, John. And reminds me of the story It's been really powerful, take and all the associated VMware services, all the things you guys are doing, the ability to say This is kind of the new area, Think of the places that you really that baseline in the cloud, And the one that really the Tansu stuff as well. the need to do that but higher ED is going to of the Federal Government resides. End the segment with So, at the end of the day, refactoring in the cloud. the VP of Cloud Infrastructure
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
North Dakota | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Gulf of Mexico | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Outpost | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
U.S. Federal Government | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AMD | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMware Cloud | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMware cloud | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Cloud Infrastructure Business Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMware Cloud | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Gov Cloud | TITLE | 0.97+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Eastern Seaboard | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
vSphere | TITLE | 0.96+ |
East Virginia Region | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.95+ |
Ragu | PERSON | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
Kubernetes | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
ninth year | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Tansu | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
AWS Outposts | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Tansu | TITLE | 0.9+ |
VMWare cloud | TITLE | 0.9+ |
AWS reInvent 2021 VMware Matt Morgan
(upbeat intro jingle) >> 'Kay, welcome back everyone to theCUBE's coverage of AWS re:Invent, 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host of theCUBE, with your Matt Morgan, Vice President of Cloud Infrastructure Business Group of VMware, CUBE alumni. Matt, great to see you. Can't wait to see you in person, but thanks for coming in remotely for the virtual now hybrid CUBE for re:Invent. >> It's good to see you too, John. Thanks for having us. You know, it's our ninth year covering re:Invented, Remember the first year we went there, it was all developers, right? >> Right. >> And reminds me of the story that you guys have with AWS, you know, VMware Cloud, and VMware with vSphere pioneered operations in IT, you know, vSphere workloads, but now you move that all in the cloud. I remember Ragu when he announced that deal with Pat Gelsinger and Andy Jassy, we covered it extensively. People were like "What are they doing here? This is interesting". Boy- >> Yeah, you- >> The pundits all get it wrong. Their relationship has been blossoming. It's been really powerful, take us through the history here. >> Thanks, John, I mean, you're absolutely right. We have a phenomenal relationship with Amazon Web Services. The value of our partnership has been realized by customers all over the world, in every industry, as they embrace the seamless hybrid cloud experience powered by VMware, vSphere, and of course VM-ware Cloud Stack. Of course, we've recently expanded our operations here, including Japan and the launch of the Soccer Regions. And we're fully open for business with the U.S. Federal Government with VMware Cloud on AWS Gov Cloud. There's strong alignment across the field with new go-to-market teams on both sides and a powerful resell agreement that enables AWS sellers to take VMware Cloud on AWS and all the associated VMware services, such as VMware cloud disaster recovery, NSX vRealize Cloud Management, to their enterprise customers. And we couldn't be doing better. >> Yeah, and you brought up a lot of things there. You mentioned Outpost, mentioned Gov Cloud, you mentioned Marketplace, which means you mentioned the acronym, which is basically, I think it's called EDP Credits, which essentially the enterprise, Amazon's Salesforce working together. So, essentially full business model and technical integrations with Amazon. So, success certainly being demonstrated there. So congratulations, that being said, there's still more to do. We got this whole big wave coming on, you see the edge, you seeing multicloud, you seeing hybrid becoming the operational model, both on premises and in the cloud. And so, customers really are asking themselves "Okay, I got VMware, I got AWS Cloud, I got to secure these clouds now. I got to start putting the business model together on top of the technical architecture". You know, microservices, Kubernetes, Tansu, all the things you guys are doing, but customers want to ask you "What about securing the cloud?", this is the number one question, what's your reaction to that? >> Yeah, it's a great topic, John, at the end of the day, this is about evolving the hybrid cloud. And if you think about it, originally, the hybrid cloud was about unifying both infrastructure and operations between the on-premises world, and the public cloud world. And now what's happening, is we are seeing people embrace that in spades, and as a result of that, their Tier 1 applications are running both on-premises and in the public cloud. And with our new announced local cloud capabilities with VMware Cloud on AWS Outpost, it's leading to this whole new enterprise architecture, which we call the distributed cloud. When you look at deploying enterprise applications in a distributed cloud environment, the conversation starts with consistent networking and importantly security. So, let's talk about that for a moment. Customers are asking us "How do we secure our data when we start having infrastructure in a variety of locations? Are our applications and networks... Are they really secure when they run in these completely different environments? And importantly, when we move an application, we take it from our on-premise data center, we move it to the public cloud are the security policies... Are they moving with it? Do I need to re-architect for that?". And the real question, all of this boils down to "Are we expanding that attack surface when we move to VMware Cloud on AWS?". And so we have to come back to what do we do here to really alleviate these concerns? With data security, it's all about encryption, universal insights. We have the super root capability within our platform to ensure that everything is measured, every message from an application, every data, it's great for Chain Of Custody, Audit. Of course we have backup DR Ransomware. On the application side, of course, segmentation is super important with application centric firewalls, VPNs, tunneling, EDR, IDS, IPS. And of course, none of that matters if you have to reset everything up every time an application moves. And this is a real unique value proposition for us, it's about portability. We deliver portable security. We can move an application, the APIs are standard. You can move it up to the public cloud, your policies, your integrations, even if it's third-party integrations, they're maintained. And that really delivers the ability to say "Look, we can make sure your attack surface is not expanding, it's a controlled environment for you". And that really shrinks the risk factors associated with moving to this distributed cloud environment. >> You know, that's the really, I think the key point, I think that you brought up this infrastructure, kind of, table stakes. Which keeps rising because security's, honestly is now there's no... There's a huge... There's no perimeter. It's huge surface area. Everything has to be secured and locked down. And the big theme at re:Invent this year is data, right? So, you know, data and security all go hand in hand. And so that brings up the aspect of the edge. The edge is now booming, you seeing 5G again, you're here hearing it here at reinvent again, more and more 5G. You mentioned local services, Outpost is evolving. This is kind of the new area, and certainly, attack factor as well. So, you mentioned this whole local services. Take me through that because this becomes interesting because this is an architectural issue for enterprises to figure out, "Okay, I got to distribute a computing architecture, it's called The Cloud and multiple clouds. Now, I've got this edge, whole 'nother opening opens up the case for the architecture conversation". What's the strategy? How do you guys view the case? How do you make the case for local services? >> So, we were super excited to announce VMware Cloud on AWS Outpost. This is a local cloud as a service offering. So, let me break that down a little bit. Of course, compute at the edge is nothing new, but the problem with traditional approaches is typically edge locations may lack IT excellence. Which means there's no one there to manage the service. VMware Cloud on AWS outposts is that local cloud as a service, meaning it's fully managed and at the edge, that's a perfect fit. It's hand in glove for those types of workloads that are out, pushed all the way out, whether it's part of an agricultural deployment or an energy production facility or retail store, where there isn't that typical IT excellence. VMware cloud on AWS outposts enables customers to deploy the same Cloud instance as they're running VMware Cloud on AWS, but be able to do it out at that edge environment. And when you look at the overall value of VMware Cloud on AWS Outpost, it's about delivering a simpler, cost effective, consistent cloud experience for those on-prem environments that matches the operating model of the public cloud. Think of the places that you really want to have cloud infrastructure, where it's critical. Going back to your point on data, getting real time insights on that data, to be able to process that, we call those perishable insights. The value is the immediacy understanding that value specific to the moment it's being captured. Think about the different types of sensor environments, where data's coming off expensive equipment, that's measuring temperature and speed. Understanding that value back to the operator - really, really important. You don't have time to pipe that data up to a cloud process and send the results back down. Edge environments require that real-time stuff. So, together with AWS, we jointly deliver a fully managed service right down to the AWS hardware on which we built the VMware cloud instance. We think about where we're seeing the most interest here. You can look across all kinds of industries and use cases, and we're seeing it specifically in healthcare, out of the hospital, manufacturing for equipment monitoring, government, higher education, where those end points are typically virtualized. There are others, but these are the big ones so far. >> You know, I was just talking to an AMD executive or product marketing person on the gaming side. And they're living this right now because they're putting all the virtual collaboration in the cloud, all the data, because they have so much data and they have so much need for these special instances, whether it's GPUs, and CPUs, a mix and match. So, as instances become more special purposed, that's going to enable them to have more productivity. But then, when you have that baseline in the cloud, the edge also has processing power. So, I think people are starting to see this notion of "Okay, I'm in the cloud, but I can also have that cloud edge without moving data back to the centralized cloud and processing it at the edge with software". >> Yeah, that's true. >> This is real. >> It's super real. And the one that really resonates with customers, is one that we all understand and that's healthcare. Anytime you're in a regional environment where you're at a hospital, think of an ICU, the criticality of that data being processed, providing the insights, this is more mission critical than any other environment, because we're dealing with human lives, think about the complex compute requirements of that environment. And then look at the beauty and elegance of this system, a cloud-based system on premises, doing that compute, providing those insights, giving reality back to the clinician, so they can make those decisions. Healthcare is super, super important. And we see customers across the spectrum, looking at what's happening at the edge and embracing it, whether it's healthcare or other industries. And again, it's a perfect fit for them. >> Yeah, real quick, before we move on to what's new, I'm want to get to that, the Tansu stuff as well. What other industries are popping out? Obviously, manufacturing. What can you talk with some industries and some verticals that are really primed for this local cloud service? >> So, let's talk about manufacturing for a moment. Manufacturing is another facility oriented compute requirement that is perfectly fit, from a system and solution way like VMware cloud on AWS Outposts. Within the manufacturing environment, there's tons of very critical machines. There's inventory management, there's a combination of time management, people management, bringing it all together to ensure that process lines are moving as required, that inventory is provided at the specific moment it's needed, and to make sure that everything, especially in today's supply chain world is provided when is required. This type of capability allows an organization to bring in that sensor data, bring in that inventory data, produce applications that manage that in real time, delivering that compute. And in the manufacturing floor, again, limited IT excellence. So, this provides that capability. Another one is energy production. Think about energy production that's out in the field in North Dakota, or out on an oil rig that might be in the Gulf of Mexico. Not only are you dealing with lack of IT excellence, you're also dealing with limited connectivity. This equipment needs to be monitored and censored and the data from those sensors help drive critical decisions. And with limited connectivity, I mean, you may not even have an LTE signal, the need to do that real time is paramount, local cloud provides that. >> Yeah, and I'd also just add, because we're going to move on, but higher ED is going to be completely transformed. Well, I think that's going to be kind of like a pleat revamp. Let's get into what's new on VMware Cloud on AWS give us the update on the new things that people should know about. That's important that they should review, take us through that, what's new? >> Yeah, absolutely. So, the first is the integration with the AWS console. This is a big thing that we're delivering because VMware Cloud on AWS is a native service of AWS. I have to kind of say that twice, it's a native service of AWS. And because of that, we get the same operational and commerce experience for VMware Cloud instances as customers do with traditional AWS services. This means customers now have a choice between AWS centric operating model, which is highly relevant to DevOps and developers, or VMware centric operating model, which is very relevant to traditional operators, and IT users. VMware Cloud on AWS Gov Cloud is expanded to the U.S., East Virginia Region, and achieved aisle five certification. This new region will make the service more relevant for the Eastern Seaboard where much of the Federal Government resides. And of course with aisle five, it opens up VMware Cloud on AWS to the U.S. military and defense contractors, which is huge because there's massive cloud transformation contracts currently in play. And of course, VMware Cloud on AWS Gov Cloud provides the most secure enterprise cloud for those DOD customers, especially when they focus on those critical Tier 1 workloads. >> It's been three years since the GA of the VMware cloud on AWS, has been earlier, since you announced it> You're pumping on all cylinders, as we had predicted, others didn't, just FYI for the folks watching. What's the final vibe? End the segment with your view of what's going on with VMware Cloud on AWS? What's the bumper sticker? >> So, at the end of the day, every customer is looking to migrate and modernize their workloads. And VMWare cloud gives them that capability to do it faster than anyone else. Customers take their applications, tier 1 applications, move it to that secure distributed cloud construct, that idea of having VMware Cloud on AWS, sharing all those security policies, all of that consistent infrastructure and operations. And then they can modernize those applications, using all of those cloud services and the ability to use Tansu to containerize where applicable. We're excited about these capabilities, and our customers are adopting it faster each and every year. And we're thrilled about the traction we're had. And we're thrilled about the partnership we have with Amazon Web Services. So, lots more to come in this space. >> Lot of great stuff, people moving up the stack on the cloud, you're seeing more refactoring in the cloud. Matt Morgan, great to see you. We've been talking 'about this for years on theCUBE. Great to come on and give some insights. All happening. Infrastructure is code. And everyone's winning with containers and microservices. So, great stuff. Thanks for coming on. >> Thanks a lot, John, take care. >> Okay, Matt Morgan, the VP of Cloud Infrastructure Business Group of VMware. This theCUBE's coverage of AWS re:Invent, 2021. I'm John Furrier, your host. Thanks for watching. (upbeat outro jingle)
SUMMARY :
remotely for the virtual It's good to see you too, John. And reminds me of the story It's been really powerful, take and all the associated VMware services, all the things you guys are doing, the ability to say This is kind of the new area, Think of the places that you really that baseline in the cloud, And the one that really the Tansu stuff as well. the need to do that but higher ED is going to of the Federal Government resides. End the segment with So, at the end of the day, refactoring in the cloud. the VP of Cloud Infrastructure
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
North Dakota | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Gulf of Mexico | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Outpost | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
U.S. | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both sides | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
U.S. Federal Government | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
AMD | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMware Cloud | TITLE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMware cloud | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Cloud Infrastructure Business Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
five | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
VMware Cloud | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Gov Cloud | TITLE | 0.97+ |
three years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Japan | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Eastern Seaboard | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
vSphere | TITLE | 0.96+ |
East Virginia Region | LOCATION | 0.96+ |
Ragu | PERSON | 0.95+ |
today | DATE | 0.95+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
5G | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Kubernetes | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
ninth year | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Tansu | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
AWS Outposts | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Tansu | TITLE | 0.9+ |
VMWare cloud | TITLE | 0.9+ |
2021 095 VMworld Matthew Morgan and Steven Jones
>>Welcome to the cubes coverage of VMworld 2021. I'm Lisa Martin, two guests joining me next. Matt Morgan is here. Vice-president cloud infrastructure business group at VMware and Steven Jones joins us as well. Director of services at AWS gentlemen. That's great to have you on the program. >>Thank you, Lisa. >>Glad to see everyone's doing well. Here we are virtual. So we are just around the four year anniversary of VMware cloud on AWS. Can't believe it's been 20 17, 4 years. Matt talked to us about VMware AWS partnership and how it's progressed over that time. >>The partnership has been fantastic and it's evolved. We announced VM-ware cloud on AWS general availability all the way back at VMworld, 2017, we've been releasing new features and capabilities every other week with 16 major platform releases and 300 features as customers have requested. So it's been an incredible co-engineering relationship with AWS. We've also expanded our go to market by announcing a resale program in which AWS can resell VMware cloud on AWS. We did that back in 2019 and in 2020, we've announced that AWS is VMware's preferred public cloud partner for vSphere based workloads. And VMware is AWS's preferred service for vSphere based workloads. >>So as you said, Matt, a tremendous amount of evolution and just a short four year timeframe. Stephen talked to me about the partnership through AWS, this lens. >>Yeah. You bet. Look, I agree with Matt that the partnership has been fantastic and it's just amazing to see how fast four years has gone. I really think that AWS and VMware really are a really good example of how two technology companies can work together for them. The benefit of our mutual customers, um, as Matt indicated, VM-ware is our preferred service for vSphere based workloads. And we're broadly working together as a single team across both engineering and go-to-market functions to help customers drive business value from the, the, the investments they made over the years. And then also as they work to transform their businesses into the future with cloud technology, >>Let's talk about digital transformation. That is a term we've been, we've been talking about that for many years on this program. And at every event we've all been at, right. What we've seen in the last year and a half is a massive acceleration. Now talk to me about how VMware and AWS are helping customers facilitate that digital transformation. >>So our customers see modern it infrastructure as the core pillar of a digital transformation strategy and public cloud has been a digital transformation enabler for organizations. And that's because they have so many benefits when they embraced the public cloud, including the ability to elastically consume infrastructure. That's required the ability to employ a pay as you go financial model and the ability to reduce operational overhead, which helps save both monetary costs, but also provides more flexibility. But the big driver now is the ability to embrace innovative cloud services and those services help accelerate application development, deployment and management VMware cloud on AWS is a prime example of such an offering, which not only provides these benefits, but enhances them with operational consistency working the same way their it architecture works today, giving them familiarity and enterprise robustness that VMware technologies are known for, but being able to maximize the power of the global AWS cloud >>And every year from a customer adoption perspective, that's doubling Steven walked through a couple of customer examples that really highlight the value of VMC on AWS. >>Yeah, I've got a couple here. I think, uh, Kiko Milano is a good one. There a then our Italian company, they sell cosmetics and beauty products through about 900 retail stores in 27 different markets. So quite large, but they found that their on premises data center and outsourcing partner was just too inflexible for the changing needs of their company. And within four months, uh, Kiko actually migrated all of their core workloads to Amazon. Is he too, and particularly surprised how easy it was to migrate over 300 servers to the VMware cloud on AWS offering. And this is, this is key because the actually leveraging the same platform that they were used to, which was BMR. Uh, the Kiko team actually didn't have to perform any testing or modify any other existing applications. They also, they didn't have to actually train their teams again, because again, they were already up-skilled with being able to leverage the BMR technology. >>So again, we think it's the best of both worlds customers like Kiko can come and use VMware cloud on AWS, consolidate their server footprint and also take advantage of, of a hyperscale platform. That's pretty cool. Another customer, uh, SAP global ratings that our company provides a high quality market intelligence in the form of credit ratings, research, and thought leadership to help educate market participants to make better financial decisions who doesn't want to make a better financial decision. Right? So in order to accelerate their business growth and globalization really meet new business capabilities, they knew they needed to move a hundred percent to the cloud and wanted to know how they're actually going to do that. Now they also have an aging data center system outages, which are becoming more frequent, which to them actually concerned that they actually might, um, uh, face in the future, some penalties from the sec. >>So they didn't want to do that. So over the period of about eight months, think about this eight months, they moved to 150 financial apps to AWS leveraging VMware on AWS. Uh, pretty impressive. They reduce technical debt, uh, from legacy systems that were hosted on sun Solaris, Oracle excavator, and a X. And then now actually able to meet the goal demands of their business. The fun part here is they're actually meeting their uptime, uh, needs a hundred percent of the time since it actually moves these workloads to the VMware cloud on AWS. So pretty exciting. See customers link this kind of journey, >>Absolutely impressive journeys. Also short time periods to do a massive change there. It sounds like the familiarity with VMware in the console is a huge facilitator of the speed of migration and folks being able to get up and running. Stephen talked to me about some of the trends that you were seeing in organizations like the customers that you just mentioned. >>Yeah. So there are some emergency transfer store and a lot of customers want to leverage the same cloud operating models, but also in their own data centers. So they can take advantage of agility and innovation of cloud will also meeting requirements that they sometimes have that keep them from adopting cloud. Uh, you can think of workloads that sometimes have low latency requirements, right? Or they need to process large volumes of data locally. Uh, other times customers tell us they really need the flexibility to run data workloads, um, in a particular area that has data sovereignty or residency requirements. So when, as we talk about customers, um, they tell us that not only do they want to minimize their, their need to actually manage and operate infrastructure, um, and focus on business innovation is sometimes need to do this, um, in a, in a data center this close to them, if that makes sense. So they're looking for the best again of both worlds. >>Got it. The best of both worlds and Matt, you have some breaking news to share. What is it? >>So today we're announcing the general availability of VMware cloud on AWS outposts. >>Awesome. Congratulations. Tell me about that. Let's dig into it. >>So for customers looking to extend their AWS centric model to an on-premise location, that data center edge location via more cloud on AWS, outposts delivers the agility and innovation of AWS cloud, but on premises and VMware cloud on AWS outpost is based on VMware cloud, a jointly engineered service. So together we're delivering this service on premises as a service. This gives us the capability to integrate VMware's enterprise class architecture and platform with next generation dedicated Amazon nitro based ECE to bare metal instances. It provides a deeply integrated hybrid cloud operating environment that extends from a customer's data center to these particular services running on premises in the data center, the edge, or to the public cloud and having a unified control plane between all of it. >>A unified control plan is absolutely critical. Uh, Stephen eight, >>We have a detailed plan to offer integrated AWS services, and that capability really enhances the innovation angle for customers as they embraced the modernization of their applications. >>Another great example of how deep the partnership is Steven AWS outpost was announced at reinvent, I think 2019, which was the last time I was at an event in person. So coming up on a couple of years here, when GA talked to me about some of the key use cases that you're seeing, where it really excels. >>Yeah. So Matt, Matt highlighted a number of these, right. And you're right. It was 2019. Uh, we were all together back then and hopefully we can do that, uh, very soon here, um, quickly on apple. So overall, since, since we're talking about outposts, uh, VMware cloud on a post as well. So the thing here and Matt highlighted this is that without posts, we actually live we've leveraged, leveraged literally the same hardware and control plane technology that we leverage in our own data centers so that the customers will come to know and love and expect about the AWS platform and VMC on AWS, uh, uh, is, is, is the exact same thing that we'll be able to get with the Apple's technology. I'll give you a couple of customer examples. I think that that actually speaks to the use cases best. So, um, you remember, I talked a little bit about data locality and residency requirements. >>So first ABI Dhabi bank, uh, is the largest bank in the United Arab Emirates, right? And they were offering corporate investment and personal banking service, and they wanted to deliver a digital banking service, including email and mobile payments, but they had to follow a specific residency and data retention requirements and they had to do it in the UAE. And so what they've done is they've actually leveraged multiple AWS outposts in the UAE to allow them to provide business continuity while also leveraging the same API APIs that they had to come to know about, uh, and love about the AWS services in region, right? Phillips healthcare is another really good example. Um, you can imagine that, uh, what they do every day is, is, uh, very important things like predictive analytics for preventative treatments. And so outposts Phillips has actually taken those and that developed cloud applications, again, deployed on the same infrastructure they were used to within region. Now they can actually do this in clinics at hospitals, and they're in managing that the same tools providing, uh, same end-to-end, um, view and to their own providers, 19 administrators. And so they actually estimate they have over 70,000 servers now distributed across 12,000 locations or 1200 locations. Excuse me. So that's an example of, again, just two use cases that really broadened the reach and the flexibility of customers to run workloads in the cloud, but in a on-premise fashion. Does that make sense? >>Yes, it does. And you mentioned two great stories there. One in financial services, the other one healthcare, two industries that have had to massively pivot in the last 18 months amongst many others, but let's talk a little bit more Steven, about some of the things that you're hearing from some of the early customers of BMC on outpost. What are some of the near term opportunities that you're uncovering? >>Yeah, I've got to say here too, that, uh, customers are VMware customers have been asking us for this for quite some time. I'm sure Matt would agree. Um, so look from, uh, go back to some of the use cases we've discussed low latency compute requirements. So one of our higher education customers today who has migrated workloads to be more cloud on AWS, um, is looking at, uh, extending the same capability to an on-premise experience specifically for, um, uh, school applications that require a low latency, um, uh, integration, um, from a local data processing perspective. Again, one of our VMware on AWS top biopharmaceutical companies, uh, here again in the U S um, is planning to use VMware cloud on AWS outposts for health management applications with patient records that need to be retained locally at the hospital hospital sites. And then finally you can kind of going back to the story around data residency. We have a large telco provider in Europe that is planning to use this particular offering for their applications that need to remain on premises to meet regulatory requirements. So again, you know, we're just super pleased with the amount of interest, not only in VMware cloud on AWS, but also in this new run that we're announcing today. And we're really excited to be able to support the VMware cloud experience really on the AWS Apple's platform for a of these use cases. >>One of the things we've talked about for many years with both VMware and AWS is the dedication to listening to the voice of the customer. Not obviously this is a great example, Steven, as you said, VMware customers have been asking for this for awhile. So while customers have a ton of choice, I want you guys to unpack what the differentiators are of this service. And Matt, if we can start with you to bring you back into the conversation, we'd love to get your, your input on those differentiators. >>Yeah, absolutely. So people have to look at this for the service that's delivered and on the VMware side of the equation, we're delivering the full VMware cloud infrastructure capability. This is delivered as a service as a cloud service on premises. So why is this valuable? Well, it relieves the it burden of infrastructure management and fully maximizes the value of a fully managed cloud service, giving an organization, the capability to unlock the renovation, budgets, and start to invest truly an innovation. This is all about continuous life cycle management, ongoing service monitoring, automated processes to ensure the health and security the infrastructure. And of course, this is backed by expert VMware site recovery and reliability engineers, to ensure that everything works perfectly. We also enable organizations to leverage best in class enterprise grade capabilities that we've talked about in our compute storage and networking for best-in-class resiliency auto-scaling and intrinsic availability. >>So there's no long procurement cycles to set up these environments. And that means it's developer ready right out of the box. We're also deeply integrated with what customers do today. So end to end hybrid cloud usually requires end-to-end hybrid processes. And with this integration into those processes is instant, no reconfiguration, no conversion, no refactoring, no rearchitecture of existing applications using VMware HDX or B motion organizations can move applications to leverage this cloud service instantly. It allows you to use established on premises governance, security, and operational policies, and ensures that that workload portability I mentioned goes both ways. It's bi-directional as customers need to have portability to meet their business requirements. As we mentioned earlier, there's a unified hybrid control plane with a single pane of glass to manage resources across the end-to-end hybrid cloud environment. And we're giving direct access to 200 plus native AWS services. And that enables an organization to truly modernize their applications, starting where they are today. And so that gives you the real capability to deliver a unique service. One that gives you an organization, the ability to migrate without any downtime have fast, fast cost effective capabilities and a low risk to their hybrid cloud strategy. >>Excellent. That's a pretty jam packed list of differentiators there, but one of the things that it really sounds like not from what you said is how much work has gone on to make the transition smooth for customers, give them that flexibility and that portability that they need. Those are marketing terms you and I know are used very frequently, but it really seems like the work that you've done here will be done straight to that. I want to ask you Stephen, that same question from AWS's perspective, what really differentiates the solution. >>It is a good question. I'll just, uh, I'll agree that there has been a ton of work first that is, has gone, gone into actually making this happen. Right. Um, and to, to all the points that Matt made. And I would just add that again. 80 was outpost is built on the same AWS nitro system and infrastructure. The customers have already come to love in the cloud. And so gone really are the days where customers have to worry about procuring and racking and stacking their own gear layer on all the benefits, the map outline from a VMware perspective. And again, we, we really believe the customers are getting the best of both worlds here. Um, with, with specifically with the compute that comes in the outpost rack, um, customers actually get getting kind of built in redundancy and resiliency, hard security, all those things that customers don't know, they need certain things. >>The customers know they need to pay attention to, but also want some help with. And so we've, we, we put a lot of thought and effort into this. Um, but could I just, uh, explain a little bit about the customer experience, um, when a customer orders and AWS outposts rack, right? AWS actually signs up, uh, to do a fully managed experience here. Like we'll bring people in to actually do site assessments. Um, we'll manage the hardware, setup, the installation and the maintenance of that gear over time. Well, VM-ware also manages the, the software defined data center construct as well as, um, the, the single point for, uh, for support questions. And so together, we really thought through how customers is met, but it get an end to end experience from hardware all the way up through application modernization. It's pretty exciting, >>Very deep partnership there. And we're out of time, but I do want to ask you guys, where can customers go, who are interested in learning more about this new service? >>So at VM world, there are a collection of DMR cloud, AWS sessions, including sessions, dedicated to VMware cloud on AWS outpost. We encourage everyone who's attending VMworld to look up those sessions and you'll learn all about the hardware, the service, the capabilities, the procurement, and how to get started. In addition, on vmware.com, we have a web portal for you to gain additional knowledge through a digital consumption. That's vmware.com/vmc-outposts. >>Awesome. Matt, thank you. I'm sure folks will be just drinking up all of this information at the sessions at VMworld 2021. And I hope to see you in person at next year's VM. I'm crossing my fingers. Great to see you guys Format Morgan and Steve Jones. I'm Lisa Martin, and you're watching the cubes coverage of the em world to 2021.
SUMMARY :
That's great to have you on the program. Matt talked to us about VMware AWS partnership and how it's progressed over that time. expanded our go to market by announcing a resale program in which AWS Stephen talked to me about the partnership through AWS, this lens. to see how fast four years has gone. Now talk to me about how VMware and AWS are helping customers facilitate that But the big driver now is the ability to embrace innovative cloud services examples that really highlight the value of VMC on AWS. Uh, the Kiko team actually didn't have to perform any testing or modify any other existing So in order to accelerate their business growth months, they moved to 150 financial apps to AWS leveraging VMware on AWS. the speed of migration and folks being able to get up and running. the flexibility to run data workloads, um, in a particular area that has The best of both worlds and Matt, you have some breaking news to share. Let's dig into it. services running on premises in the data center, the edge, or to the public cloud Uh, Stephen eight, and that capability really enhances the innovation angle for customers as they embraced Another great example of how deep the partnership is Steven AWS outpost I think that that actually speaks to the use cases best. the reach and the flexibility of customers to run workloads in the cloud, And you mentioned two great stories there. We have a large telco provider in Europe that is planning to use this particular offering for their applications And Matt, if we can start with you to bring you back into the conversation, we'd love to get your, your input on those the capability to unlock the renovation, budgets, and start to invest truly an innovation. And that enables an organization to truly modernize their applications, gone on to make the transition smooth for customers, The customers have already come to love in the cloud. The customers know they need to pay attention to, but also want some help with. And we're out of time, but I do want to ask you guys, where can customers go, the service, the capabilities, the procurement, and how to get started. And I hope to see you in person at next year's VM.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Lisa Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stephen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
UAE | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Jones | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Europe | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Lisa | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Phillips | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Steven | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Steven Jones | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
1200 locations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United Arab Emirates | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
19 administrators | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
300 features | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
150 financial apps | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two guests | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12,000 locations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
BMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stephen eight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
over 70,000 servers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
27 different markets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
eight months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both worlds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 300 servers | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
four months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Ven Savage, Morgan School District | Next Level Network Experience
>>from around the globe. It's the Cube with digital coverage of next level network experience event brought to >>you by info blocks. Okay, welcome back, everyone. This is the Cube's coverage of the next level networking experience. Virtual event within four blocks. I'm John Furrow, your host of the Cube. We're here in our Palo Alto, Calif. Studios as part of our remote access during Covic, getting the interviews and the stories and sharing that with you. We got a great guest here, then savages the network operations manager at Morgan School District in Utah. A customer of info blocks to share a story. Then thanks for coming on. >>Thanks for having >>me. First of all, the Red Sox had a plus interview. I would say right now is gonna go great. Go Sox. Which baseball was in season. Great to have you on. Um, >>we'll get there. We'll >>get there. Um, my Yankee fans say when I say that. But anyway, Miss baseball, um, you know. But that brings up covert 19 baseball season sports. Life has been impacted. Your district. Like many school districts around the world, we're told to shut down, send workers home. That meant sending kids home, too. So we got the educators, get the administration, and you've got the kids all going home. >>Yeah. >>What did you do to keep things going? Because then stop. They had to do the remote learning and new things were emerging. New patterns, new traffic, new kinds of experiences. What did you learn? What's going on? >>Well, first we tried to lock the doors and pretend we weren't there, but they found us. Um, really? I mean, real quickly in our school district, we're not a 1 to 1 operation, so the, uh that caused a big change for us. Um, we had to quickly adapt. And we chose to use chromebooks because that's what we have for the students to use in their classes. So getting that, uh, squared away and send out into the family's was was a big challenge. But then on top of that being the school district, we then had to decide. Okay, how do we protect and filter provide the filtering that the students are gonna need even though they're at home? So there's some relative safety there when they're online and and accessing your email and things like that. So those were. Our two are probably our two. Biggest hurdles was, you know, ramping up the devices and then and then providing, making sure, you know, the network access from a filtering and consistency standpoint was going to work. >>You know, I got to ask you because I see this kind of disruption you don't You don't read about this in the i t. Manual around disaster recovery and, you know, disruption to operations. But essentially, the whole thing changes, but you still got to connect to the network, DNS. You gotta get the access to the content. You got content, you get systems. You got security all to be managed while in flight of dealing with connection points that remote. So you've got the disruption and the craziness of that, and then you've got this big I o t experiment basically edge of the network, you know, in all over the place. You know, on one hand, you kind of geek out and say, Wow, this is really kind of a challenge is an opportunity to solve the problem at the same time, you know, What do you do? So take us through that because that's a is a challenge of locking down the security in a borderless environment. People are everywhere. The students business has to get done. You got to resolve to. The resource is >>so thankfully, we had migrated If it blocks several years ago. Um and just this last, I would say in October, I finally got us on. Ah, cloud the blocks. One threat defense Cloud portion of it too. So from a security standpoint, we already had a really good, um foundation in place from both the DNs aspect and the DNS security aspect. Um so that was to be honest, most users. It was seamless transition. In many regards, both users didn't even realize they were being, You know, pushed through the info blocks is cloud DNs server, you know, which was providing security and filtering. So that was a big plus for us because it it was less man hours. We had to spend troubleshooting people's DNS resolutions. Why sites Wouldn't you know? Maybe they weren't being filtered correctly. All that was was to be honest, perfect. Where other platforms we had previously were just a nightmare to manage, >>like, for example, of the old way versus the new way here and marital, is it? What files configuration will take us through? What? You >>know, it was like a separate. It was a separate product content filter that works in conjunction with the firewall. Um, and I'm not going to name the company's name. I don't want, you know, even though many company but it seemed with that product we were spending, on average about 3 to 4 hours a day fixing false positives just from a filtering aspect because it would interfere with the DNS. And it does. It didn't really do it. I mean, how it filters is not based on DNS. Totally right. So by migrating temple blocks are DNS and the filtering the security is all handling at the DNs level. And it was just much more, um, to be I mean, frankly, honestly, is much more invisible to the end user. So >>more efficient. You decouple filtering from DNs resolution. Got it. All right, this is the big topic. I've been talking with info blocks people on this program in this event is on how this new d d I layer DNs d XP and I p address management kind of altogether super important. It's critical infrastructure Yeah. No spoilers, Enterprise. You're borderless institution. Same thing you go to school as a customer. How does the d I lay out this foundational security play for delivering this next level experience? What's your take on that? >>Well, for our like, for a school platform, we we use it in a number of ways. Besides, I mean, the filtering is huge, but just for the ability, like, for example, one of the components is is response policy zones or DNS firewalls what they call it, and that allows you one to manage, um, traditional, like DNS names, right? P addresses you can. You can manage those by creating essentially a zone that is like a white list of blacklist rewrite. So you've got a lot of control, and again it's filtering at the DNs level, so it's looking based on DNS responses inquiry. The other aspect of that is, is the feeds that you receive from info blocks. So by subscribing to those, we, um we have access to a lot of information that info Blocks and their partners have created identifying, you know, bad actors, malware attack vectors based on again DNs, uh, traffic, if you will, and so that takes a load office. Not having to worry. I'm trying to do all that on our own. I mean, we've seen a lot of attacks minimized because of the feeds themselves. So that again frees us up. We're a very small school district. In some regards, there's a I am the only network person in the district, and there's like, a total of four of us that manage, you know, kind of the support aspect. And so, being able to not have to spend time researching or tracking down, you know, breaches and attacks as much because of the DNS. Security frees me up to do other things, you know, like in the more standard networking realm, from a design and implementation. >>Great. Thanks for sharing that. I want to ask about security as a very competitive space security here and everyone promising it different things at different security things. You know, by I gotta ask you, why did you guys decide to use info blocks and what's the reason behind it? >>Well, to be frankly honest, I'm actually in info blocks trainer and I've been training for 15 years, so I kind of had an agenda when I first took this job to help out the school district. In my experience, I've been doing working in networking for over 20 years. And in my experience, I ever boxes one of the most easy and in best managed DNS solutions that I've come across. So, um, you know, I might be a little biased, but I'm okay with that. And so I I pushed us to be honest, to get there and then from the security aspect has all that has evolved. It just makes to me it makes sense. Why not wrap the more things you can maybe wrapped together. And so you know, when you're talking about attacks, over 90% of attacks use DNS. So if I have a solution that is already providing my DNS and then wraps the security into it, it just makes the most sense for me. >>Yeah. I mean, go back. The info box is DNA. You got cricket. Liu Stuart Bailey, the founder, was this is zero. This didn't just wake up one day and decided to start up these air practitioners early days of the Internet. They know DNS cold and DNS is we've been evolved. I mean, and when it needs that when you get into the DNS. Hacks and then you realize Okay, let's build an abstraction layer. You've seen Internet navigation discovery, all the stuff that's been proven. It is a critical infrastructure. >>Well, and to be honest, it's It's one of those services that you can't can't filter the firewall right. You have to have it. You have to. It's that foundation layer. And so it makes sense that Attackers air leveraging it because the fire will has to let it through in and out. And so it's a natural, almost a natural path for them to break in. So having something that speaks native DNS as part of your security platform makes more sense because it it can understand and see those attacks, the more sophisticated they become as well. >>So I gotta ask you, since you're very familiar info blocks and you're actually deploying its great solution. But I got this new DD I Layer, which is an abstraction, is always a great evolution. Take away complexity and more functionality. Cloud certainly cloud natives everywhere. That's but if it's for what is the update, if if I'm watching this month, you know I've been running DNS and I know it's out there. It's been running everything. And I got a update, my foundation of my business. I got to make my DNS rock solid. What's the new update? What's info blocks doing now? I know they got DNS chops seeing that on it. What's new about info blocks? What do you say? >>Well, it's, you know, they have a couple things that they've been trying to modify over the last several years. In my opinion, making more DNS like a you know, like software as a service, you know, service on demand, type of approach. That's a yes. So you have the cloud components to where you can take a lot of the heavy lifting, maybe off of your network team's shoulders. Because it is, it is. Um, I think people will be surprised how many customers out there. I have, ah, teams that are managing the DNS and even the D HCP aspect that that's not really what their experiences and then they don't They don't have, ah, true, maybe background Indians, and so having something that can help make that easier. It's almost, you know, hey, maybe used this term it almost sounds like it's too simple, but it's almost like a plug and play approached for some. For some environments, you know you're able to pop that in, and a lot of probably the problems they've been dealing with and not realizing what the root cause was will be fixed. So that's always a huge component with with info blocks. But their security is really what's come about in the last several years, Um, and and back as a school district, you know, our besides securing traffic, which every customer has to do, um, we have our you know, we're We have a lot of laws and regulations around filtering with with students and teachers. So anyone that's using a campus own device And so for us this I don't think people realized that the maturity that the filtering aspect of the blocks one defence now it's it's really evolved over the last couple of years. It's become a really, really good product and, like I said earlier, just work seamlessly with the data security. So it is going to be using >>an SD Wan unpacked everything. You go regular root level DNs is it? So I gotta ask you. How is the info blocks helping you keep network services running in system secure? >>Well, I think I think we're more on just the DNs d It does R d eight DNS and DCP. So from that standpoint, you know, in the five years almost we've been running that aspect. We have had very little if if maybe one or two incidents of problems with, you know from a DNS TCP so so are our users are able to connect, you know, when they turn on their computer To them, the Internet's up. You know, there's no there's no bumps in the road stopping them from from being able to connect. So that's a huge thing. You know, you don't have to deal with those Those constant issues again is a small team that just takes time away from the big projects. You're trying to, um, and then to the being able to now combine things. Security filtering solution. Uh, that alone has probably saved us. Oh, we'll probably you know, upwards of 500 man hours in the last eight months. So where normally we would be spending those hours again, troubleshooting issues that false positives, things like that. And there's a small team that just sucks the life out of you when you have to. You always spend time on that. >>I mean, you always chasing your tails. Almost. You want to be productive. Automation plays >>a >>key role in that, >>right? Yeah. >>So I got to ask you, you know, just a general question. I'm curious. You know, one of the things I see is sprawling of devices. WiFi was a great example that put an access point up a rogue access point, you know, as you get more connections. De HCP was amazing about this is awesome. But also, you had also de HCP problem. You got the the key Management is not just around slinging more d HDP around. So you got the trend? Is more connections on the eyepiece? Not how does info blocks make that easier? Because for people who may not know, the DNS ends announcing TCP and IP address management. They're all kind of tied together. Right? So this >>is the >>magic of DD I in my head. I want to get your thoughts on how you see that. Evolving. >>Yeah, I think that's another kind of back twice. It's kind of almost like a plug and play for a lot of customer environments. They're getting, you know, you're getting the DSP, DNs and eye Pam all wrapped in once you have this product that speaks, well, those languages, if you will and that And, um along with some of the reporting services and things of that nature. Um, when I look for, like, a Mac address in my influx database, I'm not just going to get ah, Mac address and what the i p addresses. I'm not just going to get the DNs like the host name. Maybe you know, the beauty and fully qualified domain name. Either I have the ability to bring in all this information that one. The client is communicating with the DCP DNS server on top of things like metadata that you can configure in the database to help really color in the picture of your network. So when you're looking at what device is using this I p when we talk about rogue devices or things like that, uh, I can get so much more information out of info blocks that almost almost to the point where you're almost being able to nail down the location of where the devices that even if it's a wireless client because it works in conjunction with some of our wireless appointments, too. So within, you know, a matter of minutes we have almost all the information we would need to take whatever action is appropriate for something like that, that getting used to take us hours and hours to troubleshoot. >>Appreciate a lot of the other interviews I've done with the info blocks, folks. One of the things that came out of them is the trailing. You can see the trail they're getting. They got to get in somewhere. DNS is the footprints of there you got? That's the traffic, and that's been helping on a potential attacks in D DOS is, for example, no one knows what that is, but DNS is what he said. A lot of the surface areas, DNS. With the hackers are makes it easier to find things. >>Well, you know, by integrating with the cloud I've I've got, you know, that the cloud based with the blocks one, it added a advanced DNS security, which helps protect skins Adidas as well as any cast to help provide more availability because I'm pushing on my DNs traffic through those cloud servers. It's like I've I'm almost equivalent of a very large organization that would normally spend millions of millions of dollars trying to do this on their own. So I'm getting the benefits and kind of the equivalent from that cloud hybrid approach that normally we would never have have. The resource is, >>Well, then I really appreciate you taking the time out of your busy day to remote into the Cube studios. Talk about next level networking experience, so I want to just ask you, just put your experience hat on. You've been You've seen some waves. You've seen the technology evolve when you hear next level networking and when you hear next level networking experience almost two separate meetings. But next level networking means next level. Next level networking experience means is some experience behind it. One of those two phrases mean to you next level networking and next level networking experience. >>Well, to me, I always look at it as the evolution of being able to have a user experience that's consistent no matter where you're located, with your home in your office and special with in today's environment. We have to be able to provide that consistent experience. But what I think what a lot of people may not think about or my overlook if you're just, you know, more of an end user is along with that experience, it has to be a consistent excess security approach. So if I'm an end user, um, I should be able to have the access the, um and the security, which, you know, you know, filtering all that fun stuff to not just allow me the connectivity, but to bring me, you know, that to keep the secure wherever I met. And ah, um, I think schools, you know, obviously with code and in the one the one that everyone was forced to do. But I think businesses And generally I think that's, you know, years ago, Cisco when I worked with Cisco, we talked about, you know, the remote user of the mobile user and how Cisco is kind of leading, uh, the way on that. And I think, you know, with the nature of things like this pandemic, I think being able to have your your users again have that consistent experience, no matter where they're at is going to be key. And so that's how I see when I think of the network evolution, I think that's how it it has to go. >>Well, we appreciate your your time sharing your insights Has a lot of a lot of people are learning that you've got to pour the concrete to build the building. DNS becoming kind of critical infrastructure. But final question for you. I got you here, you know? How you doing? Actually, schools looks like they're gonna have some either fully virtual for the next semester or some sort of time or set schedule. There's all kinds of different approaches. This is the end of the day. It's still is this big i o t experiment from a traffic standpoint. So new expectations create new solutions. What do you see on the horizon? What challenges do you see as you ride this way? Because you've got a hold down the fort, their school district for 3000 students. And you got the administration and the faculty. So you know What are you expecting? And what do you hope to see Evolve Or what do you want to stay away from? What's your opinion? >>I think? I think my my biggest concern is, you know, making sure our like, our students and staff don't, uh, you know, run into trouble on by say that more from, you know, you know, by being, you know, being exposed to attacks, you know, their data with Delta becomes, you know, comes back to our data as a district. But, you know, the student data, I think I think, you know, with anything kids are very vulnerable. Ah, very role, vulnerable targets for many reasons. You know, they're quick to use technology that quick to use, like social media, things like that. But they're they're probably the first ones to do security Does not, you know, across their mind. So I think my big my big concern is as we're moving this, you know, hybrid, hybrid approach where kids can be in school where they're going to be at home. Maybe they'll change from the days of the week. It'll fluctuate, uh, keeping them secure, you know, protecting them from themselves. Maybe in a way, if I have to be the guy is kind of the grumpy old dad it looked at. I'm okay with wearing that hat. I think that's my biggest. Our concern is providing that type of, uh, stability and security. So parents at the end of that could be, you know, I have more peace of mind that their kids you know, our online even more. It's great >>that you can bring that experience because, you know, new new environments, like whether it zooming or using, try and get the different software tools that are out there that were built for on premise premises. You have now potentially a click here. Click there. They could be a target. So, you know, being safe and getting the job done to make sure they have up time. So the remote access it again. If you've got a new edge now, right? So the edge of the network is the home. Exactly. Yeah. Your service area just got bigger. >>Yeah. Yeah, we're in. You know, I'm everybody's guest, whether they like it or not. >>I appreciate that. Appreciate your time and good luck. And let's stay in touch. Thanks for your time. >>Hey, thanks for having me. You guys have a good rest of your weekend? Day two. State State. >>Thank you very much. It's the Cube's coverage with info blocks for a special next level networking experience. Pop up event. I'm John for the Cube. Your host. Thanks for watching. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
SUMMARY :
It's the Cube with digital coverage of next you by info blocks. Great to have you on. we'll get there. um, you know. What did you do to keep things going? making sure, you know, the network access from a filtering and consistency standpoint experiment basically edge of the network, you know, in all over the place. blocks is cloud DNs server, you know, which was providing security and filtering. I don't want, you know, even though many company but Same thing you go to school as a customer. lot of information that info Blocks and their partners have created identifying, you know, why did you guys decide to use info blocks and what's the reason behind it? And so you know, when you're talking about attacks, over 90% of attacks use DNS. I mean, and when it needs that when you get into the DNS. Well, and to be honest, it's It's one of those services that you can't can't What do you say? So you have the cloud components to where you can take a lot of the heavy lifting, maybe off How is the info blocks helping you keep network services running in system secure? So from that standpoint, you know, in the five years almost we've I mean, you always chasing your tails. Yeah. you know, as you get more connections. I want to get your thoughts on how you see that. So within, you know, a matter of minutes we have almost Appreciate a lot of the other interviews I've done with the info blocks, folks. Well, you know, by integrating with the cloud I've I've got, you know, that the cloud based You've seen the technology evolve when you hear next but to bring me, you know, that to keep the secure wherever I met. I got you here, you know? on by say that more from, you know, you know, by being, So, you know, being safe and getting the job done to make sure they have You know, I'm everybody's guest, whether they like it or not. I appreciate that. You guys have a good rest of your weekend? Thank you very much.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Red Sox | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Furrow | PERSON | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
Liu Stuart Bailey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
3000 students | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two phrases | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Delta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Mac | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Adidas | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Utah | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
over 20 years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both users | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
over 90% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two incidents | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
1 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
several years ago | DATE | 0.96+ |
Day two | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
D DOS | TITLE | 0.95+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
four blocks | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
Yankee | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
4 hours a day | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
about 3 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
zero | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
pandemic | EVENT | 0.91+ |
500 man | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
this month | DATE | 0.9+ |
One threat | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
years ago | DATE | 0.89+ |
Palo Alto, Calif. Studios | LOCATION | 0.88+ |
Ven Savage | PERSON | 0.86+ |
millions of millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
DD I Layer | OTHER | 0.85+ |
two separate meetings | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
one day | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
first ones | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
last couple of years | DATE | 0.83+ |
next semester | DATE | 0.82+ |
Go Sox | ORGANIZATION | 0.82+ |
last eight months | DATE | 0.82+ |
19 baseball season sports | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
Morgan School District | ORGANIZATION | 0.72+ |
last | DATE | 0.69+ |
baseball | TITLE | 0.68+ |
School District | ORGANIZATION | 0.66+ |
years | DATE | 0.65+ |
Indians | PERSON | 0.58+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.55+ |
info | ORGANIZATION | 0.5+ |
Morgan | LOCATION | 0.48+ |
influx | ORGANIZATION | 0.43+ |
Covic | EVENT | 0.43+ |
Cube | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.35+ |
Matt Morgan, VMware, and Fred Wurden, AWS | VMware Cloud on AWS Update
>> Voiceover: From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, connecting with thought leaders all around the world, this is a CUBE conversation. >> Hi, I'm Stu Miniman, and welcome to this announcement with VMware cloud on AWS update. Happy to welcome back to the program, Matt Morgan. He is the Vice President of global marketing with VMware cloud services. And welcome into the program Fred Wurden, he's the general manager of EC2 enterprise at Amazon Web Services. Thank you so much both for joining us. >> Good to see you Stu. >> Same, thanks Stu. >> Matt, and Fred, the VMware AWS partnership is one that has gotten a lot of attention. I know any time back in the day when we used to go to physical trade shows, I could know when there was a session talking about this because it was usually full and overflowing. When I've written about this topic or doing videos about it it definitely gets quite a lot of attention. So it's been over three years since the partnership was announced but still, when I talk to people, they don't necessarily really understand the depth of the integration and the work that gets done on both sides even though you get clear messages from both Andy Jassy and Pat Gelsinger about how important this is. Matt, maybe start with you and Fred would love your commentary as to this three year partnership and where we are today here in 2020. >> Absolutely, since the initial announcement of the VMware AWS relationships, we have actually built a very special cloud service. And today, we're actually deepening our partnership. In fact, today, VMware goes to market saying that AWS and only AWS is our preferred public cloud partner for all vSphere based workloads. VMware cloud on AWS is a jointly engineered service. Meaning, our product teams our r&d teams are all working together to deliver VMware enterprise class Software Defined data center solution to the AWS cloud. VMware Cloud foundation is the core technology that's behind our service. And it gives us the capability to deliver that same level of infrastructure familiarity and consistency that our customers use today, across every data center location, the edge and of course inside the public cloud. VMware cloud on AWS attracts an enormous amount of interest from customers. And these customers are in every vertical, whether you're speaking of healthcare, media and entertainment, transportation, financial services, manufacturing, energy, government, education, professional services, and of course technology. And together with AWS, we're bringing together services that are being used across the whole portfolio of cloud optionality. This includes cloud migration from whether you're talking about a single app or complete data center, disaster recovery, whether you're talking about replacing a legacy system or building new disaster recovery in the cloud. Data center extension building that hybrid cloud. And of course, modernizing applications which we classify under the term application modernization. >> Great, and Fred from the Amazon side. >> Yeah, the partnership is been fantastic over three years. And I can't express enough how hard it is to actually deliver a simple solution that customers are asking for from all levels of both organizations. And to do that it takes both AWS and VMware to deliver a solution that allows companies to leverage what they know today and extend that into the cloud. And leverage all of the benefits that we're going to go over and a rapid delivery of new features which they haven't had before ever. So it's fantastic a partnership. I love what we've been doing at all levels. And I say it's going to continue. The scale at which we're growing is fantastic. And with that, I'm happy to go over some of the announcements and why we're doing what we're doing which is all based on listening and what our customers want. >> Excellent. Well, Fred, hey, we're glad first of all, that it did not get called VMC on AWS SS. Because we have enough acronyms already in tech. Matt, VMware and AWS, of course, clear leadership in the marketplace. With three years, bring us inside as to you talked about all the verticals that were used, but where's the proof on the adoption of this technology? Love to hear a little bit about that. >> Yeah, absolutely. So we have customer examples across the verticals we spoke of, but it's the customer stories that are the real value demonstrator. Let's pick up a couple of those. IHS market, they were able to move 1000 plus workloads to the public cloud. And that story is kind of common in the world. But what's unique about this particular story is IHS market moved them in just six weeks. If you look at the cloud migration strategy in general, for someone to move that fast with that many workloads, it's unheard of. VMware empowers that because the operating setup that organizations have standardized in their data center is identical in the public cloud. So organizations can move workloads we see them move hundreds of workloads in a week from their data center up to the public cloud. In addition to that, we have customer examples like the Pennsylvania Lumberman's Mutual Insurance Company. They were able to demonstrate 20% cost savings by moving their disaster recovery systems to VMware cloud on AWS. And that was initial savings right off the rip. Other customers like William Hill, George St. PA, Stage Coast, PHS Mortgage, they're all demonstrating the significant value adds when people move over to the public cloud, but leverage that VMware cloud solution. >> And Fred obviously, AWS also plays across these environments. We would like to hear your side too. >> Yeah, a couple examples like S&P global ratings, they spin up a new application environment in a few hours instead of months. Let alone taking all the burden off of their supply chain and management of that. Like Matt said in terms of seeing cost savings. So agility and speed allows them to really focus on their applications and start to modernize and innovate in areas that really differentiate them. They've had 100% uptime for regulatory applications and a 50% improved disaster recovery time. Other customers have built out a disaster recovery plan and then actually spun to VMware cloud on AWS as their primary because they had better performance. So it's the whole range of options in terms of better performance, better TCL and economics and mostly agility on what they can do going forward with applications that may already be built on AWS as well with native services. >> Matt, you touched on some great customer examples, maybe maybe give us some, broad themes as to what are the key drivers as to why customers are adopting VMware cloud on AWS? >> Yeah, absolutely. As with any infrastructure conversation, total cost of ownership is a big piece of the equation. Organizations want to look at their footprint today. They want to look at their footprint next year, and then of course, many years out. So when you look at the public cloud, cloud economics are a big driver. VMware, of course adopts the whole concept of cloud economics whole full horse. Meaning that we give you the capability to recognize the advantages of an apex object model, the ability to have on demand services, the ability to have a managed IaaS, all of that is part and parcel to our service. But on top of that, there's unique capabilities that VMware cloud on AWS delivers that deliver unique economic value. The first is this concept of zero refactoring. Our customers tell us that this alone allows them to eliminate what they call is rework, sometimes called the rework tax. Which prevents organizations from moving applications to the cloud without reworking them, without working their data layer, re architecting how they run, they can move them because the operating layer is consistent. Another area of value that's unique to VMware cloud on AWS is the leverage of existing skill sets. Today's operators are trained on vCenter. They're trained on all the supporting infrastructure around VMware. All of that applies with VMware cloud on AWS. So the ability to translate those skills into a cloud skill set right off the bat is of enormous value. Of course flexibilities another big one, as organizations embrace what it being seen as composite applications, which are applications that span the data center, the public cloud out to the edge. The ability to move logic as needed to be able to have portability is something we deliver. Again, that's an economic value that we are able to provide. Now this has been quantified by third parties. There's been several major third parties, including Forrester, including IDC, that have published value added statements around the total economic impact of VMware cloud on AWS. In fact, just last year, there was a study that was commissioned by Forrester that demonstrated a 59% reoccurring savings in terms of infrastructure and operating savings, compared to an on premise implementation. When you look at migration that accelerates to 69% 'cause organizations can save almost 70% of moving applications by eliminating rework and refactoring. That's an IDC statistic. >> All right Matt. Maybe it would make sense to talk about just overall adoption of the solution. I believe you've got some stats you can share. >> So yeah, if you look at the adoption, we have delivered enormous growth over the last year of the service. Total number of hosts year over year are up 2.5x. Total number of running VMs year over year is actually larger at 3.5x. Which indicates that customers are not just adopting, but they're accelerating their adoption. We now have 21,000 plus number of hands on labs that have been consumed since July of 2019, a year ago. And there are now 300 plus validated technology partner solutions available. And on top of that, 530 channel partners with VMware cloud service competency are now registered and available to assist. These are tremendous statistics for 12 short months. >> Well, congratulations on to both VMware and AWS on that progress. Maybe talk a little bit about trends. Just briefly, if I look over the last three months we've talked about AWS and VMware customers. Obviously, with the global pandemic, there's been certain things that they've needed to rapidly do things like, VDI, end user computing, remote contact centers are something that they need to rapidly expand on. But, is there anything different or general trends that that you would both like to share? Matt, we'll once again, start with you and then Fred get your take on it. >> Yeah, there's a regional school district in the US that in light of COVID, needed to spin up 10,000 plus people working remotely. And by leveraging VMware cloud on AWS, they were able to conduct virtual classrooms in very short order by leveraging this broad scale infrastructure powered by VMware cloud on AWS. Over time, that provided flexibility and agility, but it also reduced their costs. They've been able to eliminate hardware replacement plans that were going to cost significant amount of money. In fact, they're showing and telling us that they're able to save 75% of those forecasted costs. But everything is really about business continuity today. Today's unfortunate economic environment where we're working through this pandemic, this global pandemic, IT organizations and businesses, they're embracing a tried and true understanding of what it means to move to the cloud. But they're embracing it in a more aggressive way because the supply chain has been disrupted. If you think about a traditional supply chain, where organizations have to receive machines, set up those machines, have them wired in have certain people on site to get those machines configured, move application. That's a lot of steps in the process, many of which have been totally disrupted during the pandemic. The idea of VMware cloud on AWS is that you replace an analog supply chain with a digital supply chain. We can now help organizations get new equipment, new capacity, new resources up and running instantly. They don't have to worry about all the steps that were previously required that have been disrupted in a pandemic. The cloud provides that operating environment that maps one for one to the realities of today's world. And they're also able to understand that looking forward, that that setup enables them to be more future ready. Ready for whatever comes next to deliver what the business needs. >> Yeah, there's a number of reasons that you just touched on Matt, that are examples that we can bring out on that elasticity. For example, Penny Mac, anytime there are changes in the market, for example, on either both for VDI or just on processing of loans. When the pandemic hit, a lot of people actually paused on both looking and or changing their patterns. And this solution has been fantastic for either scaling up or scaling down both ways. And they can do it very quickly. They can do it within a number of a variety of means whether it's a single VM, or it's moving an entire migration into VMware cloud on AWS. So great results there. The case studies speak for themselves. There's a lot of examples that we have up on both of our sites. We'd really be good to take a look at those in detail if you're interested, it's fun to see. Helps a lot of people out. >> If I could follow up with you on something here. I want to talk about I go to the cloud, often that movement is step one, how do I take advantage of modernization, whether that be for my application standpoint, or leveraging new services? I wonder you can give me the AWS side there? And, Matt would love to hear how VMware is helping customers along this journey too. >> Well, the first is we want to meet people they're at with their knowledge set and their skill set. And this is a fantastic part. Customers can move quickly with the domain knowledge that they've go. We can assist in translating and making sure that the environment and the STDC is set up in a way that is tailored to what their needs are. Whether it's an extension, or if it's a complete migration of step one. But step two really is once they're leveraging VMware cloud on AWS is they have a lot of needs in terms of their CICD, their development tools, or samples and applications around automation. And we can take and help them with that. That content is already posted on our developer tool site and our developer center for this solution. It really assists them in learning about how to leverage the elasticity and the security and the networking capabilities that allow them to go in and then use all the rest of the rich AWS services as well. So, if you look at some of the things that are coming out for example, VMware Transit Connect. Which allows, a layer three solution to be built on top of our AWS transit gateway so that we can interconnect multiple VPCs in an environment that may be running either software as a solution on AWS or a native application that was built with managed services, completely in sync and in harmony, with VMware cloud on AWS. So that's what's happening at a rapid pace. It allows people to bite off the chunks that they want to modernize and reuse tools that are either familiar with them, and or automation improvements that we've got between code tools across the board. So it's great to see the work that they're doing >> Great, and Matt on the modernization piece. >> Yeah, so our surveys tell us that customers want to modernize their existing applications. But those same customers don't want to start over. So this is an important value proposition that we deliver in partnership with AWS. Organizations can take a business process application, they can migrate it to the cloud, they can extend and reach that application with AWS services. They can extend and reach that applications with additional machine learning capabilities, they can extend it with containerized extensions. They can support a broader modern agenda without having to start over. And I think that that is a value proposition that resonates with everyone, because people often need must leverage what they already have built with what the baseline is for the business itself. In addition to this, composite applications are now becoming the norm. With data and processing being more CO located, end to end Applications often consist of processing and data for certain tasks to be either pushed out to the edge or remain on premises in the data center in addition to the cloud. That value proposition of VMware delivering a hybrid cloud with consistent infrastructure and operations enables those composite applications to be built and deployed in a highly efficient way, which is a big piece to the modernization story. In addition to this with tons of Kubernetes grid as a customer managed option, organizations can run those containerized components right on top of our service, all of which integrates very cleanly with a whole library of services that AWS offers. End to end, you have all the optionality you need plus the speed of migration and capabilities once you get up to the public cloud. >> All right, let's get into the new pieces of the partnership here. Matt, first of all, when I think about VMware cloud on AWS, the customers that I've mostly spoken to over the last couple of years have tended to be some of the larger enterprises. I've heard you're alluding towards some capabilities to the small and medium business. I know I'm looking forward to talking to PLM insurance, one of the companies that are leveraging this solution as part of this announcement. What's new and the impact that this will have on the addressable market that VMware cloud can hit for AWS? >> Yeah, so with this announcement, VMware cloud on AWS, we're extending it to offer three new capabilities. Three new announcements of capabilities. The first one is all about what you just spoke of. Which is about extending the VMware cloud on AWS value proposition to more customers. So currently, customers can spin up production clusters with three hosts are, of course much more than that. But three hosts was kind of the entry level for a production cluster. What we're announcing is the ability to create production clusters with all the capable abilities that go into what we define as a production cluster with just two hosts. That means customers will be able to deploy production environments with two hosts in a cluster, dramatically reducing their costs. In fact, the traditional costs will come down by 33%. So this is all about providing the full capabilities of VMware cloud on AWS, but to be able to do it at a smaller investment envelope. So in addition to this, we're rolling out enhancements to VMware cloud director offering it as a service. VMware cloud director now will deliver multi tenancy to VMware cloud on AWS specifically designed for MSPs. As you know VMware partner ecosystem is filled with managed service providers. We have a mean enormous collection of these that add value on top of VMware cloud on AWS. Here by using VMware vcloud director service, they can deliver multi tenancy to their customers. And this is designed specifically to serve the needs of small to medium sized enterprises. These capabilities enable MSPs to serve those needs and it will be available initially in North America. And this will give them the opportunity to say, hey, if you want to get started on VMware cloud on AWS, we can give you bite sized pools designed specifically for what you need. And this is a very asset light pay as you grow model, which aligns specifically to that market. >> It's fascinating to watch Matt, I think, not that many years ago, if I had attended VMworld and talked to the MSPs. And they talk how deeply they appreciate the VMware partnership and that cloud company was the enemy. And, today AWS and VMware partnering with them, helping to make sure that in this hybrid world that they play a role to help get to the enterprise. Fred, anytime we go to reinvent, new announcements usually come to a huge fanfare, even something like a new bare metal instance. Last year it was the I3en metal instance. People get pretty excited. Help us understand you know what this really means, what advantages it has? Are there any limitations? What should we know about the capabilities AWS has now available to the VMware cloud? >> Well, first off, thanks Stu, I3en is really exciting that we're launching. It will meet the need of storage intensive workloads. And it'll do it far better than what we've had before. It takes advantage of all the learnings and the investments that we put into instances across the board for AWS such as Nitro. If you have, high random IO access, such as needed for relational database or workloads that have additional security that we have baked in, it's going to meet those needs. Compared to I3 metal, it has more memory, more usable, high performance storage and additional security. The example of a yield compared to I3 is about a 22% performance improvement and value. We're delivering four times the raw storage for about 2.2 times the cost. So in essence, you're getting raw storage at half the cost of an I3. So customers are excited. it's one of many instances that we will launch in the future for VMware cloud on AWS. And that's one of the advantages, is people can instantly take advantage of these innovations that we have. Just like we've done across all of the other instance families to meet workloads that customers are talking to us about that they want to run on this platform. >> Excellent, well, we really look forward. I know we're going to have a deep dive with Colbert to go into a little bit under the hood. And as I mentioned, got one of your joint customers PLM Insurance to understand their use case and how they're doing it. Matt and Fred, if you could just give us final takeaway, VMware cloud on AWS, Matt, and then Fred. >> Well, first off, thank you Stu for this opportunity to speak. I always enjoy spending time with you and certainly with Fred. We're just super excited and thrilled about our partnership. VMware couldn't be happier with our partnership with AWS from engineering to marketing, customer experience. Our teams are working together hand in glove to ensure success for our customers. VMware cloud on AWS is a truly unique service. Customers can continue business operations with minimal disruption in case of any uncertain event, they can migrate their workloads fast in a very cost effective manner with minimal risk. And we're really all about helping large enterprises as well as small and medium businesses accelerate their cloud migration and modernization journey. In fact, if you look across the board, we have seen enormous uptake. And now with these new offerings that we talked about, especially the two hosts production cluster, and VMware cloud Director service, we believe we're going to be more attractive to more organizations of various sizes. We're excited about the road ahead. >> And Fred. >> Customers are excited about this road, I would add. One, thank you guys for having us on. It's great to tell this story. The feedback has been phenomenal . The growth in the adoption and what we're seeing in terms of the use cases across the board is much stronger than we could have imagined. So it's really great to see this work that is hard to do to really merge the best of VMware and the best of AWS in a true deep partnership. And that takes work at all layers, whether it's a commerce system integration, or if it's the instance engineering and roadmap work across the board or networking. And customer support across the board for solutions that run on this platform. Both of us are joined to make sure customers are satisfied regardless of what it takes. That's something that no one else has. And it is unique. And it's a long term commitment that we have with each other to do the right thing for the solution. 'Cause we can't do it individually. This is something that truly only a joint partnership as strong as this is, and has gotten stronger can deliver. So we're super excited about it. I think you're going to continue to see the pace of innovation on what we're delivering increase. And so, with that, it's been great to work with VMware on this. It's really fun. >> Well, thank you, Fred. Thank you, Matt. Yeah, congratulation to your team. And of course, love hearing the customer stories and feedback. >> Thank you Stu. >> All right. Be sure to check out the other interviews as part of this announcement and check out theCUBE.net of course, we're covering VMware and AWS deeply including their shows whether they are in person or virtual. I'm Stu Miniman and thank you for watching theCUBE.
SUMMARY :
leaders all around the world, He is the Vice President of the integration and of the VMware AWS relationships, And leverage all of the benefits in the marketplace. of common in the world. And Fred obviously, AWS also plays and start to modernize So the ability to translate those skills sense to talk about just of hands on labs that have on to both VMware and AWS And they're also able to There's a lot of examples that we have up the cloud, often that movement that is tailored to what their needs are. the modernization piece. In addition to this with of the partnership here. the opportunity to say, that they play a role to across all of the other to go into a little bit under the hood. for this opportunity to speak. that we have with each other Yeah, congratulation to your team. Be sure to check out the
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Fred | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Forrester | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Fred Wurden | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
69% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two hosts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
59% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IDC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
33% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
July of 2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
12 short months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
North America | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
three hosts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan & Wei Wang, VMware | VMware Cloud on Dell EMC
>>from the Cube Studios in Palo Alto and Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world. This is a cube conversation. >>Hey, welcome back, everybody. Jeff Frick here with the Cube. We have a cube conversation today talking about an exciting announcement coming out of our friends over it at V M, where it's the second generation via VMware Cloud on Dell EMC. And to tell us more about it, we've got a couple Cube alumni that we're always happy to have on. First off, we're joined by Matt Morgan. He is the VP of marketing at VMware. Matt, Great to see you. Great CTO. And then Wei Wang, She's the product or director of product marketing of the VMware way. Great to see you as well. >>Nice to see you, Jeff. >>So, first off, hope you guys were getting through. Ah, the stay at home and work from home and family. Everything good >>thes air. Unprecedented times for sure, But we're fortunate and we're doing fine. I hope everything is going well with you and your family. >>Yeah, Thank you. I mean, we are lucky to be an IT space. So we can We can flip the digital much easier than some industries. Let's jump into this announcement. Second generation via VMware Cloud on Dell, EMC. You guys only announced this in production like a year ago. So, Matt, what? What kind of drove a second generation already know What were some of the drivers and what what is the essence of the second generation? >>Yeah, the space is moving really fast. As you know, Public Cloud has captured the imagination of practically every IT organization on the planet. Because the public cloud provides a new way of doing business. It allows you to consume technology on demand, allows you to have the elasticity, allows you to have op ex financial treatment. But more importantly, it takes you out of the core management business. No more hardware refreshes. No more operational control of the core infrastructure. This is all delivered as a service. The problem is, in order to get this value, you have to turn to the public cloud. You have to actually replace your workload in the data center that someone else managed, and that data center might be far away from the data that is being generated. And so in many cases, It's just simply not practical to move all of your workloads there. So on premise, technology is still going to be important. What VMware announced way back in 2000 and 18 I think it was August 2018 at VM World is Project Dimension, and the whole concept was about delivering the cloud to the data center but truly allowing you to run your data center or data center infrastructure in a truly manage, cloud centric way. We then commercialized it when we announced via VMware Cloud on Dell, EMC, the product and the uptake has been off the hook. We've seen industry analysts like you saw with Rick. We've seen our customers really embrace this technology, and we've got an enormous feedback and that feedback is also driven a new set of requirements. And the truth is, while we envisioned this technology to clearly be an edge play, our customers are telling us it's a data center play. They believe that they can reimagine their data center to operate just like a cloud, and by deploying via VMware cloud on Dell EMC. This facilitates their needs to do that, but they needed a new class of system something a lot more powerful than our first generation, something that could take on all of the workloads. In fact, there's a slide. If you want to pull it up, we kind of illustrate this. The second generation solution is all about turning the volume up to 11. We are enabling organizations to put two times as many VMS on this technology. They, in effect, can run twice as many workloads. More importantly, for a nightie architect, they can design a system that will take on the most demanding, most complex business critical applications with largest set of data and be able to manage that as a entity but in a cloud model on premises. >>Now, Matt I'm struck a little bit because, you know, first if you talk about edge and this was really, you know, kind of a response to growth of the edge and the anticipated growth of edge and I ot and then at the now you're saying really, you know, there's this great opportunity in the data center, and I think we had Rick on from IDC, talked about local cloud as a service, so that's spanning a pretty wide range of environments, workloads, all types of demand. So what are the real critical, you know, kind of functional capabilities of a local cloud as a service and specifically with VMware Cloud. >>So we partnered with Rick when he was defining this category. And if you look at what Rick's research, he sees this category growing. I think too close to $5 billion all in revenue, that all in revenue is coming in the next 2.5 years. That's a faster scale out than we saw HCI. And in his research he's finding the same information that we found when we did our early customer surveys. We have identified a real need at the edge, but let's not underplay that. If you look at a 5G cell tower, typically they need compute that's local. They're gonna be tons of these erected over the next few years, and they don't have on-premise IT infrastructure people to manage that technology, so there's an opportunity to have a managed approach where the compute is local, but it's managed as a cloud. Clearly, the solution is custom designed for that, but I can look at a dozen other IoT centric opportunity. Let's talk about energy production. An offshore oil rig. Again, no IT Staff. The need for compute lots of sensor data, the opportunity to deliver a managed approach gives you that capacity. Let's look at agriculture again, pushing out compute to the edge. So this edge component is another hyper growth area or information technology, and we have a great solution. Custom built for that. However, as I had mentioned right, the growth of use cases includes the most important, the most significant business critical apps that are really big gaps that live in the data center. This can include a variety of different use cases. Think about a hospital. They have data centers in each of the regions. That's all perfect fit for this. Talk about a technology base for virtualized desktop infrastructure. Think about having to deploy an SAP application. There's a dozen more I can think of right off the top of my head. But what we did with the second generations we listen >>to the customer. >>The customers wanted more power. They wanted more capacity. They wanted the opportunity to have a full rack that could beat their expectations on the capacity and power side so that they can fulfill their requirements, and that's what this >>is all about. >>So that's great, Matt way, you're You're a little bit more in the weeds in the product development. What are some of the things that you're excited about in this second gen offering that maybe people aren't as aware of or maybe is a little bit below the radar, >>Right? Okay, so let me first and talk about that. This is truly, as Matt pointed out, is not an insignificant release, right? This is not incremental. We, for example, that our customer we're rolling out a full 40 to argue rack that is support the traditional use cases and also that more than use cases and thinking about also a brand new eastern type that we call internal people Montt medium that in which we doubled not the sock account, but also the CPU moving from a to 24 CPUs to a 48 total and double our realm Rama 368 to 700 before and also doubling to introducing all flash like envy. MB based flash secondary storage for, um, 11 point half to 23 terabytes. And all these is really to honing in what might have pointed out that enterprise class. You know, the hi workloads, very density work clothes, right? You can put into the area 12 to 15. This kind of notes offer development and allows you to have that in the data center and to making sure that you have that kind of capacity for performance. We have that. The second thing I want to mention, as you can imagine, is the VD I I think virtual desktop infrastructure cannot be more important have this environment. Everybody is looking at it, and especially for the highly regulated industries like healthcare. So VMware right? We help for where the market leader with our offerings as a VM or horizon solution. So what happens in this release is we actually 35? We'll be certified on the VM or as horizon solution to making sure that we offer that enterprise distributed capacity to the industry that we really want to run up fast and also to making sure that they obviously cannot have actually support to have that capacity to offer the remote workers to front line healthcare workers and other business continuity type off use cases to that capacity for video. The last one is actually as you can imagine. Also in this environment is data backup and recovery. Right? The the enterprises are looking for a solution that in which they can not only backup protect and also search for search for the things that they can actually, for historical reasons. So in this release, we're actually certified to solutions for back up the 1st 1 of course, with our friends at Dell. Right, Dell data protect solution. The 2nd 1 is that's an industry leading solution right there. And the 2nd 1 is actually the beam, though so but with both solutions now, we can truly offer our customers who are looking for enterprise strength a backup solution to for the continuity and also for this to continue to operate in this environment. >>So I'm just curious. Before we let you go, you talked about this being a pretty significant release and we've talked about markets basis from edge back into the data center. Ah, and really kind of enterprise class heavy workloads, critical workloads, applications running this so as you look forward, you know, not give me any secrets out in terms of roadmap. But Where do you see this? This class of application evolving. >>So I think that you can imagine the week we talked to a variety of customers there different ways. We can actually expand this many off our retail customers has talked about their suggestions and 5G towers. Not only we can expand it to a data center, we probably will actually offer this type of solutions into, for example, a substantial retail shop or a back of pizza shop that's going small on one end. The other end is, I think, that many of our customers have expressed interest off off colocators, right. They're working with in other geographical areas that they're actually working with local providers that that they don't they don't own themselves. They do not even wanted to purchase right the cooling and managing the space. So they want us to provide an integrated solution with many of the large colocators, but as well as some of the niche colocators, so that we can offer that end to end and offer that together a city platform to our partners. So that's where we're going >>very exciting space, and you guys do. Move quick, Matt. I'll give you the last word before we sign out where people get more information. Wouldn't g A Or I guess, or is it is G. I think we are, Um, give us the last word. >>Yes, so yes, the services available. People can get more information BMR dot com And I think you know the truth of the matter is the cloud is an operating model. It's not an individual data center location, right? And the idea of a cloud. A cloud operating model that could be hybrid that can move from public cloud data centers to your own own data centers to the edge to everywhere in between, including MSC's VMware provides a great platform that standardizes across that on one of the things that is a driver for VMware customers is their ability to eat their existing workloads without having to modify re factor or rework the right. I have a workload that I sit in a data center in a public cloud of VM where simply V motion or use HC X to move that workload, and I could be up and running instantly on that consistency as a lot of flexibility, agility and, you know, it helps people do things faster. So I think those of my final comments it was really good to see you, Jeff. Thanks for having us. You >>do. Thanks for checking in. Ah, I think it's the first time we've done one of these, But certainly we've spent lots of time together around the Cube set. So Ah, I'm glad everybody's healthy and this to show passed. So keep working hard to keep delivering great products. And thanks again for stopping by. >>Thank you. >>Alright, He's Matt and way. I'm Jeff. You're watching the Cube. Thanks for watching. We'll see you next time. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah.
SUMMARY :
from the Cube Studios in Palo Alto and Boston connecting with thought leaders all around the world. Great to see you as well. Ah, the stay at home and work from home and family. I hope everything is going well with you and your family. So we can We can flip the digital much easier in order to get this value, you have to turn to the public cloud. So what are the real critical, you know, lots of sensor data, the opportunity to deliver a managed approach gives you that capacity. that they can fulfill their requirements, and that's what this What are some of the things that you're excited about in this second gen offering that maybe You can put into the area 12 to 15. Before we let you go, you talked about this being a pretty significant release and we've talked about markets So I think that you can imagine the week we talked to a variety of customers there I'll give you the last word before we on that consistency as a lot of flexibility, agility and, you know, So Ah, I'm glad everybody's healthy and this to We'll see you next time.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
August 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff Frick | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Wei Wang | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
first generation | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
48 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second generation | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$5 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two times | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
twice | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second generations | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second gen | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
23 terabytes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
2000 | DATE | 0.98+ |
18 | DATE | 0.98+ |
Cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Dell EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
24 CPUs | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
2nd 1 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both solutions | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
15 | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
1st 1 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
12 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
IDC | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
35 | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
VM World | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Second generation | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
a year ago | DATE | 0.94+ |
11 | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
MSC | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
BMR dot com | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
one end | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
HCI | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
VMware Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
dozen | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
700 | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
next 2.5 years | DATE | 0.86+ |
up to 11 | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
Rama | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.81+ |
a dozen | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
Project Dimension | ORGANIZATION | 0.77+ |
VMware Cloud | TITLE | 0.76+ |
Cube | PERSON | 0.75+ |
couple | QUANTITY | 0.7+ |
half | QUANTITY | 0.67+ |
horizon | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
next few years | DATE | 0.64+ |
V M | ORGANIZATION | 0.56+ |
Morgan McLean, Google Cloud Platform & Ben Sigelman, LightStep | KubeCon + CloudNativeCon EU 2019
>> Live from Barcelona, Spain it's theCUBE, covering KubeCon, CloudNativeCon, Europe 2019. Brought to you by Red Hat, the Cloud Native Computing Foundation and Ecosystem Partners. >> Welcome back. This is theCUBE's coverage of KubeCon, CloudNativeCon 2019. I'm Stu Miniman, my co-host for two days wall-to-wall coverage is Corey Quinn. Happy to welcome back to the program first Ben Sigelman, who is the co-founder and CEO of LightStep. And welcome to the program a first time Morgan McLean, who's a product manager at Google Cloud Platform. Gentlemen, thanks so much for joining us. >> Thanks for having us. >> Yeah. >> All right so, this was a last minute ad for us because you guys had some interesting news in the keynote. I think the feedback everybody's heard is there's too many projects and everything's overlapping, and how do I make a decision, but interesting piece is OpenCensus, which Morgan was doing, and OpenTracing, which Ben and LightStep were doing are now moving together for OpenTelemetry if I got it right. >> Yup. >> So, is it just everybody's holding hands and singing Kumbaya around the Kubernetes campfire, or is there something more to this? >> Well I mean, it started when the CNCF locked us in a room and told us there were too many projects. (Stu and Ben laughing) Really wouldn't let us leave. No, to be fair they did actually take us to a room and really start the ball rolling, but conversations have picked up for the last few months and personally I'm just really excited that it's gone so well. Initially if you told me six or nine months ago that this would happen, I would've been, given just the way the projects were going, both were growing very quickly, I would've been a little skeptical. But seriously, this merger's gone beyond my wildest dreams. It's awesome, both to unite the communities, it's awesome to unite the projects together. >> What has the response been from the communities on this merger? >> Very positive. >> Yeah. >> Very positive. I mean OpenTracing and OpenCensus are both projects with healthy user bases that are growing quickly and all that, but the reason people adopt them is to future-proof their own software. Because they want to adopt something that's going to be here to stay. And by having these two things out in the world that are both successful, and were overlapping in terms of their goals, I think the presence of two projects was actually really problematic for people. So, the fact that they're merging is net positive, absolutely for the end user community, also for the vendor community, it's a similar, it's almost exactly the same parallel thought process. When we met, the CNCF did broker an in-person meeting where they gave us some space and we all got together and, I don't know how many people were there, like 20 or 30 people in that room. >> They did let us leave the room though, yesterday, yeah that was nice. >> They did let us leave the room, that's true. We were not locked in there, (Morgan laughing) but they asked us in the beginning, essentially they asked everyone to state what their goals were. And almost all of us really had the same goal, which is just to try and make it easy for end users to adopt a telemetry project that they can stick with for the long haul. And so when you think of it in that respect, the merger seems completely obvious. It is true that it doesn't happen very often, and we could speculate about why that is. But I think in this case it was enabled by the fact that we had pretty good social relationships with OpenCensus people. I think Twitter tends to amplify negativity in the world in general, as I'm sure people, not a controversial statement. >> News alert, wait, absolutely the negatives are, it's something in the algorithm I think. >> Yeah, yeah. >> Maybe they should fix that. >> Yeah, yeah (laughs) exactly. And it was funny, there was a lot of perceived animosity between OpenTracing and OpenCensus a year ago, nine months ago, but when you actually talk to the principals in the projects and even just the general purpose developers who are doing a huge amount of work for both projects, that wasn't a sentiment that was widely held or widely felt I think. So, it has been a very kind of happy, it's a huge relief frankly, this whole thing has been a huge relief for all of us I think. >> Yeah it feels like the general ask has always been that, for tracing that doesn't suck. And that tends to be a bit of a tall order. The way that they have seemed to have responded to it is a credit to the maturity of the community. And I think it also speaks to a growing realization that no one wants to have a monoculture of just one option, any color you want so long as it's black. (Ben laughing) Versus there's 500 different things you can pick that all stand in that same spot, and at that point analysis paralysis kicks in. So this feels like it's a net positive for, absolutely everyone involved. >> Definitely. Yeah, one of the anecdotes that Ben and I have shared throughout a lot of these interviews is there were a lot of projects that wanted to include distributed tracing in them. So various web frameworks, I think, was it Hadoop or HBase was-- >> HBase and HDFS were jointly deciding what to do about instrumentation. >> Yeah, and so they would publish an issue on GitHub and someone from OpenTracing would respond saying hey, OpenTracing does this. And they'd be like oh, that's interesting, we can go build an implementation file and issue, someone from OpenCensus would respond and say, no wait, you should use OpenCensus. And with these being very similar yet incompatible APIs, these groups like HBase would sit it and be like, this isn't mature enough, I don't want to deal with this, I've got more important things to focus on right now. And rather than even picking one and ignoring the other, they just ignored tracing, right? With things moving to microservices with Kubernetes being so popular, I mean just look at this conference. Distributed tracing is no longer this kind of nice to have when you're a big company, you need it to understand how your app works and understand the cause of an outage, the cause of a problem. And when you had organizations like this that were looking at tracing instrumentation saying this is a bit of joke with two competing projects, no one was being served well. >> All right, so you talked about there were incompatible APIs, so how do we get from where we were to where we're going? >> So I can talk about that a little bit. The APIs are conceptually incredibly similar. And the part of the criteria for any new language, for OpenTelemetry, are that we are able to build a software bridge to both OpenTracing and OpenCensus that will translate existing instrumentation alongside OpenTelemetry instrumentation, and omit the correct data at the end. And we've built that out in Java already and then starting working a few other languages. It's not a tremendously difficult thing to do if that's your goal. I've worked on this stuff, I started working on Dapper in 2004, so it's been 15 years that I've been working in this space, and I have a lot of regrets about what we did to OpenTracing. And I had this unbelievably tempting thing to start Greenfield like, let's do it right this time, and I'm suppressing every last impulse to do that. And the only goal for this project technically is backwards compatibility. >> Yeah. >> 100% backwards compatibility. There's the famous XKCD comic where you have 14 standards and someone says, we need to create a new standard that will unify across all 14 standards, and now you have 15 standards. So, we don't want to follow that pattern. And by having the leadership from OpenTracing and OpenCensus involved wholesale in this new effort, as well as having these compatibility bridges, we can avoid the fate of IPv6, of Python 3 and things like that. Where the new thing is very appealing but it's so far from the old thing that you literally can't get there incrementally. So that's, our entire design constraint is make sure that backwards compatibility works, get to one project and then we can think about the grand unifying theory of a provability-- >> Ben you are ruining the best thing about standards is that there is so many of them to choose from. (everyone laughing) >> There's still plenty more growing in other areas (laughs) just in this particular space it's smaller. >> One could argue that your approach is nonstandard in its own right. (Ben laughing) And in my own experiments with distributed tracing it seems like step one is, first you have to go back and instrument everything you've built. And step two, hey come back here, because that's a lot of work. The idea of an organization going back and reinstrumenting everything they've already instrumented the first time. >> It's unlikely. >> Unless they build things very modularly and very portably to do exactly that, it's a bit of a heavy lift. >> I agree, yeah, yeah. >> So going forward, are people who have deployed one or the other of your projects going to have to go back and do a reinstrumentation, or will they unify and continue to work as they are? >> So, I would pause at the, I don't know, I would be making up the statistic, so I shouldn't. But let's say a vast majority, I'm thinking like 95, 98% of instrumentation is actually embedded in frameworks and libraries that people depend on. So you need to get Dropwizard, and Spring, and Django, and Flask, and Kafka, things like that need to be instrumented. The application code, the instrumentation, that burden is a bit lower. We announced something called SpecialAgent at LightStep last week, separate to all of this. It's kind of a funny combination, a typical APM agent will interpose on individual function calls, which is a very complicated and heavyweight thing. This doesn't do any of that, but it takes, it basically surveys what you have in your process, it looks for OpenTracing, and in the future OpenTelemetry instrumentation that matches that, and then installs it for you. So you don't have to do any manual work, just basically gluing tab A into slot B or whatever, you don't have to do any of that stuff which is what most OpenTracing instrumentation actually looks like these days. And you can get off the ground without doing any code modifications. So, I think that direction, which is totally portable and vendor neutral as well, as a layer on top of telemetry makes a ton of sense. There are also data translation efforts that are part of OpenCensus that are being ported in to OpenTelemetry that also serve to repurpose existing sources of correlated data. So, all these things are ways to take existing software and get it into the new world without requiring any code changes or redeploys. >> The long-term goal of this has always been that because web framework and client library providers will go and build the instrumentation into those, that when you're writing your own service that you're deploying in Kubernetes or somewhere else, that by linking one of the OpenTelemetry implementations that you get all of that tracing and context propagation, everything out of the box. You as a sort of individual developer are only using the APIs to define custom metrics, custom spans, things that are specific to your business. >> So Ben, you didn't name LightStep the same as your project. But that being said, a major piece of your business is going through a change here, what does this mean for LightStep? >> That's actually not the way I see it for what it's worth. LightStep as a product, since you're giving me an opportunity to talk about it, (laughs) foolish move on your part. No, I'm just kidding. But LightStep as a product is totally omnivorous, we don't really care where the data comes from. And translating any source of data that has a correlation ID and a timestamp is a pretty trivial exercise for us. So we do support OpenTracing, we also support OpenCensus for what it's worth. We'll support OpenTelemetry, we support a bunch of weird in-house things people have already built. We don't care about that at all. The reason that we're pursuing OpenTelemetry is two-fold, one is that we do want to see high quality data coming out of projects. We said at the keynote this morning, but observability literally cannot be better than your telemetry. If your telemetry sucks, your observability will also suck. It's just definitionally true, if you go back to the definition of observability from the '60s. And so we want high quality telemetry so our product can be awesome. Also, just as an individual, I'm a nerd about this stuff and I just like it. I mean a lot of my motivation for working on this is that I personally find it gratifying. It's not really a commercial thing, I just like it. >> Do you find that, as you start talking about this more and more with companies that are becoming cloud-native rapidly, either through digital transformation or from springing fully formed from the forehead of some God, however these born in the cloud companies tend to be, that they intuitively are starting to grasp the value of tracing? Or does this wind up being a much heavier lift as you start, showing them the golden path as it were? >> It's definitely grown like I-- >> Well I think the value of tracing, you see that after you see the negative value of a really catastrophic outage. >> Yes. >> I mean I was just talking to a bank, I won't name the bank but a bank at this conference, and they were talking about their own adoption of tracing, which was pretty slow, until they had a really bad outage where they couldn't transact for an hour and they didn't know which of the 200 services was responsible for the issue. And that really put some muscle behind their tracing initiative. So, typically it's inspired by an incident like that, and then, it's a bit reactive. Sometimes it's not but either way you end up in that place eventually. >> I'm a strong proponent of distributed tracing and I feel very seen by your last answer. (Ben laughing) >> But it's definitely made a big impact. If you came to conferences like this two years ago you'd have Adrian, or Yuri or someone doing a talk on distributed tracing. And they would always start by asking the 100 to 200 person audience, who here knows what distributed tracing is? And like five people would raise their hand and everyone else would be like no, that's why I'm here at the talk, I want to find out about it. And you go to ones now, or even last year, and now they have 400 people at the talk and you ask, who knows what distributed tracing is? And last year over half the people would raise their hand, now it's going to be even higher. And I think just beyond even anecdotes, clearly businesses are finding the value because they're implementing it. And you can see that through the number of companies that have an interest in OpenTracing, OpenTelemetry, OpenCensus. You can see that in the growth of startups in this space, LightStep and others. >> The other thing I like about OpenTelemetry as a name, it's a bit of a mouthful but that's, it's important for people to understand the distinction between telemetry and tracing data and actual solutions. I mean OpenTelemetry stops when the correct data is being omitted. And then what you do with that data is your own business. And I also think that people are realizing that tracing is more than just visualizing a single distributed trace. >> Yeah. >> The traces have an enormous amount of information in there about resource usage, security patterns, access patterns, large-scale performance patterns that are embedded in thousands of traces, that sort of data is making its way into products as well. And I really like that OpenTelemetry has clearly delineated that it stops with the telemetry. OpenTracing was confusing for people, where they'd want tracing and they'd adopt OpenTracing, and then be like, where's my UI? And it's like well no, it's not that kind of project. With OpenTelemetry I think we've been very clear, this is about getting >> The name is more clear yeah. >> very high quality data in a portable way with minimal effort. And then you can use that in any number of ways, and I like that distinction, I think it's important. >> Okay so, how do we make sure that the combination of these two doesn't just get watered-down to the least common denominator, or that Ben just doesn't get upset and say, forget it, I'm going to start from scratch and do it right this time? (Ben laughing) >> I'm not sure I see either of those two happening. To your comment about the least common denominator, we're starting from what I was just commenting about like two years ago, from very little prior art. Like yeah, you had projects like Zipkin, and Zipkin had its own instrumentation, but it was just for tracing, it was just for Zipkin. And you had Jaeger with its own. And so, I think we're so far away, in a few years the least common denominator will be dramatically better than what we have today. (laughs) And so at this stage, I'm not even remotely worried about that. And secondly to some vendor, I know, because Ben had just exampled this, >> Some vendor, some vendor. >> that's probably not, probably not the best one. But for vendor interference in this projects, I really don't see it. Both because of what we talked about earlier where the vendors right now want more telemetry. I meet with them, Ben meets with 'em, we all meet with 'em all the time, we work with them. And the biggest challenge we have is just the data we get is bad, right? Either we don't support certain platforms, we'll get traces that dead end at certain places, we don't get metrics with the same name for certain types of telemetry. And so this project is going to fix that and it's going to solve this problem for a lot of vendors who have this, frankly, a really strong economic incentive to play ball, and to contribute to it. >> Do you see that this, I guess merging of the two projects, is offering an opportunity to either of you to fix some, or revisit if not fix, some of the mistakes, as they were, of the past? I know every time I build something I look back and it was frankly terrible because that's the kind of developer I am. But are you seeing this, as someone who's probably, presumably much better at developing than I've ever been, as the opportunity to unwind some of the decisions you made earlier on, out of either ignorance or it didn't work out as well as you hoped? >> There are a couple of things about each project that we see an opportunity to correct here without doing any damage to the compatibility story. For OpenTracing it was just a bit too narrow. I mean I would talk a lot about how we want to describe the software, not the tracing system. But we kind of made a mistake in that we called it OpenTracing. Really people want, if a request comes in, they want to describe that request and then have it go to their tracing system, but also to their metric system, and to their logging stack, and to anywhere else, their security system. You should only have to instrument that once. So, OpenTracing was a bit too narrow. OpenCensus, we've talked about this a lot, built a really high quality reference implementation into the product, if OpenCensus, the product I mean. And that coupling created problems for vendors to adopt and it was a bit thick for some end users as well. So we are still keeping the reference implementation, but it's now cleanly decoupled. >> Yeah. >> So we have loose coupling, a la OpenTracing, but wider scope a la OpenCensus. And in that aspect, I think philosophically, this OpenTelemetry effort has taken the best of both worlds from these two projects that it started with. >> All right well, Ben and Morgan thank you so much for sharing. Best of luck and let us know if CNCF needs to pull you guys in a room a little bit more to help work through any of the issues. (Ben laughing) But thanks again for joining us. >> Thank you so much. >> Thanks for having us, it's been a pleasure. >> Yeah. >> All right for Corey Quinn, I'm Stu Miniman we'll be back to wrap up our day one of two days live coverage here from KubeCon, CloudNativeCon 2019, Barcelona, Spain. Thanks for watching theCUBE. (soft instrumental music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Red Hat, the Cloud Native Happy to welcome back to the program first Ben Sigelman, because you guys had some interesting news in the keynote. and really start the ball rolling, like 20 or 30 people in that room. They did let us leave the room though, And so when you think of it in that respect, in the algorithm I think. and even just the general purpose developers And that tends to be a bit of a tall order. Yeah, one of the anecdotes that Ben and I have shared HBase and HDFS were jointly deciding And rather than even picking one and ignoring the other, And the only goal for this project There's the famous XKCD comic where you have 14 standards is that there is so many of them to choose from. growing in other areas (laughs) just in this One could argue that your to do exactly that, it's a bit of a heavy lift. and get it into the new world without requiring that by linking one of the OpenTelemetry implementations But that being said, a major piece of your business one is that we do want to see high quality data you see that after you see the negative value And that really put some muscle and I feel very seen by your last answer. You can see that in the growth of startups And then what you do with that data is your own business. And I really like that OpenTelemetry has clearly delineated and I like that distinction, I think it's important. And you had Jaeger with its own. Some vendor, And so this project is going to fix that and it's going to solve is offering an opportunity to either of you to fix some, and then have it go to their tracing system, And in that aspect, I think philosophically, Best of luck and let us know if CNCF needs to pull you guys Thanks for having us, Thanks for watching theCUBE.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Ben Sigelman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2004 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Corey Quinn | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Stu Miniman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ben | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Red Hat | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cloud Native Computing Foundation | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Stu | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Python 3 | TITLE | 0.99+ |
two projects | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Java | TITLE | 0.99+ |
five people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
LightStep | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Adrian | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
400 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
KubeCon | EVENT | 0.99+ |
30 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Morgan McLean | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
200 services | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each project | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CNCF | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
nine months ago | DATE | 0.99+ |
Yuri | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
OpenCensus | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
OpenCensus | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Barcelona, Spain | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
OpenTracing | TITLE | 0.99+ |
CloudNativeCon | EVENT | 0.98+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
95, 98% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
200 person | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Ecosystem Partners | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one option | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one project | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two-fold | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both projects | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
six | DATE | 0.97+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ | |
two years ago | DATE | 0.97+ |
15 standards | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
LightStep | TITLE | 0.96+ |
GitHub | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
CloudNativeCon 2019 | EVENT | 0.96+ |
'60s | DATE | 0.96+ |
OpenTracing | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
Zipkin | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
John Thomas, IBM & Elenita Elinon, JP Morgan Chase | IBM Think 2019
>> Live from San Francisco, it's theCUBE covering IBM Think 2019, brought to you by IBM. >> Welcome back everyone, live here in Moscone North in San Francisco, it's theCUBE's exclusive coverage of IBM Think 2019. I'm John Furrier, Dave Vellante. We're bringing down all the action, four days of live coverage. We've got two great guests here, Elenita Elinon, Executive Director of Quantitative Research at JP Morgan Chase, and John Thomas, Distinguished Engineer and Director of the Data Science Elite Team... great team, elite data science team at IBM, and of course, JP Morgan Chase, great innovator. Welcome to theCUBE. >> Welcome. >> Thank you very much. >> Thank you, thank you, guys. >> So I like to dig in, great use case here real customer on the cutting edge, JP Morgan Chase, known for being on the bleeding edge sometimes, but financial, money, speed... time is money, insights is money. >> Absolutely. Yes. >> Tell us what you do at the Quantitative Group. >> Well, first of all, thank you very much for having me here, I'm quite honored. I hope you get something valuable out of what I say here. At the moment, I have two hats on, I am co-head of Quantitative Research Analytics. It's a very small SWAT, very well selected group of technologists who are also physicists and mathematicians, statisticians, high-performance compute experts, machine learning experts, and we help the larger organization of Quantitative Research which is about 700-plus strong, as well as some other technology organizations in the firm to use the latest, greatest technologies. And how we do this is we actually go in there, we're very hands-on, we're working with the systems, we're working with the tools, and we're applying it to real use cases and real business problems that we see in Quantitative Research, and we prove out the technology. We make sure that we're going to save millions of dollars using this thing, or we're going to be able to execute a lot on this particular business that was difficult to execute on before because we didn't have the right compute behind it. So we go in there, we try out these various technologies, we have lots of partnerships with the different vendors, and IBM's been obviously one of few, very major vendors that we work with, and we find the ones that work. We have an influencing role as well in the organization, so we go out and tell people, "Hey, look, "this particular tool, perfect for this type of problem. "You should try it out." We help them set it up. They can't figure out the technology? We help them out. We're kind of like what I said, we're a SWAT team, very small compared to the rest of the organization, but we add a lot of value. >> You guys are the brain trust too. You've got the math skills, you've got the quantitative modeling going on, and it's a competitive advantage for your business. This is like a key thing, a lot of new things are emerging. One of things we're seeing here in the industry, certainly at this show, it's not your yesterday's machine learning. There's certainly math involved, you've got cognition and math kind of coming together, deterministic, non-deterministic elements, you guys are seeing these front edge, the problems, opportunities, for you guys. How do you see that world evolving because you got the classic math, school of math machine learning, and then the school of learning machines coming together? What kind of problems do you see these things, this kind of new model attacking? >> So we're making a very, very large investment in machine learning and data science as a whole in the organization. You probably heard in the press that we've brought in the Head of Machine Learning from CMU, Manuela Veloso. She's now heading up the AI Research Organization, JP Morgan, and she's making herself very available to the rest of the firm, setting strategies, trying different things out, partnering with the businesses, and making sure that she understands the use case of where machine learning will be a success. We've also put a lot of investments in tooling and hiring the right kinds of people from the right kinds of universities. My organization, we're changing the focus in our recruiting efforts to bring in more data science and machine learning. But, I think the most important thing, in addition to all that investment is that we, first and foremost, understand our own problems, we work with researchers, we work with IBM, we work with the vendors, and say, "Okay, this is the types of problems, "what is the best thing to throw at it?" And then we PoC, we prove it out, we look for the small wins, we try to strategize, and then we come up with the recommendations for a full-out, scalable architecture. >> John, talk about the IBM Elite Program. You guys roll your sleeves up. It's a service that you guys provide with your top clients. You bring in the best and you just jump in, co-create opportunities together, solving problems. >> That is exactly right. >> How does this work? What's your relationship with JP Morgan Chase? What specific use case are you going after? What are the opportunities? >> Yeah, so the Data Science Elite Team was setup to really help our top clients in their AI journey, in terms of bringing skills, tools, expertise to work collaboratively with clients like JP Morgan Chase. It's been a great partnership working with Elenita and her team. We've had some very interesting use cases related to her model risk management platform, and some interesting challenges in that space about how do you apply machine learning and deep learning to solve those problems. >> So what exactly is model risk management? How does that all work? >> Good question. (laughing) That's why we're building a very large platform around it. So model risk is one of several types of risk that we worry about and keep us awake at night. There's a long history of risk management in the banks. Of course, there's credit risk, there's market risk, these are all very well-known, very quantified risks. Model risk isn't a number, right? You can't say, "this model, which is some stochastic model "it's going to cost us X million dollars today," right? We currently... it's so somewhat new, and at the moment, it's more prescriptive and things like, you can't do that, or you can use that model in this context, or you can't use it for this type of trade. It's very difficult to automate that type of model risk in the banks, so I'm attempting to put together a platform that captures all of the prescriptive, and the conditions, and the restrictions around what to do, and what to use models for in the bank. Making sure that we actually know this in real time, or at least when the trade is being booked, We have an awareness of where these models are getting somewhat abused, right? We look out for those types of situations, and we make sure that we alert the correct stakeholders, and they do something about it. >> So in essence, you're governing the application of the model, and then learning as you go on, in terms of-- >> That's the second phase. So we do want to learn at the moment, what's in production today. Morpheus running in production, it's running against all of the trading systems in the firm, inside the investment bank. We want to make sure that as these trades are getting booked from day to day, we understand which ones are risky, and we flag those. There's no learning yet in that, but what we've worked with John on are the potential uses of machine learning to help us manage all those risks because it's difficult. There's a lot of data out there. I was just saying, "I don't want our Quants to do stupid things," 'cause there's too much stupidity happening right now. We're looking at emails, we're looking at data that doesn't make sense, so Morpheus is an attempt to make all of that understandable, and make the whole workflow efficient. >> So it's financial programming in a way, that's come with a whole scale of computing, a model gone astray could be very dangerous? >> Absolutely. >> This is what you're getting at right? >> It will cost real money to the firm. This is all the use-- >> So a model to watch the model? So policing the models, kind of watching-- >> Yes, another model. >> When you have to isolate the contribution of the model not like you saying before, "Are there market risks "or other types of risks--" >> Correct. >> You isolate it to the narrow component. >> And there's a lot of work. We work with the Model Governance Organization, another several hundred person organization, and that's all they do. They figure out, they review the models, they understand what the risk of the models are. Now, it's the job of my team to take what they say, which could be very easy to interpret or very hard, and there's a little bit of NLP that I think is potentially useful there, to convert what they say about a model, and what controls around the model are to something that we can systematize and run everyday, and possibly even in real time. >> This is really about getting it right and not letting it get out of control, but also this is where the scale comes in so when you get the model right, you can deploy it, manage it in a way that helps the business, versus if someone throws the wrong number in there, or the classic "we've got a model for that." >> Right, exactly. (laughing) There's two things here, right? There's the ability to monitor a model such that we don't pay fines, and we don't go out of compliance, and there's the ability to use the model exactly to the extreme where we're still within compliance, and make money, right? 'Cause we want to use these models and make our business stronger. >> There's consequences too, I mean, if it's an opportunity, there's upside, it's a problem, there's downside. You guys look at the quantification of those kinds of consequences where the risk management comes in? >> Yeah, absolutely. And there's real money that's at stake here, right? If the regulators decide that a model's too risky, you have to set aside a certain amount of capital so that you're basically protecting your investors and your business, and the stakeholders. If that's done incorrectly, we end up putting a lot more capital in reserve than we should be, and that's a bad thing. So quantifying the risks correctly and accurately is a very important part of what we do. >> So a lot of skillsets obviously, and I always say, "In the money business, you want the best nerds." Don't hate me for saying that... the smartest people. What are some of the challenges that are unique to model risk management that you might not see in sort of other risk management approaches? >> There are some technical challenges, right? The volume of data that you're dealing with is very large. If you are building... so at the very simplistic level, you have classification problems that you're addressing with data that might not actually be all there, so that is one. When you get into time series analysis for exposure prediction and so on, these are complex problems to handle. The training time for these models, especially deep learning models, if you are doing time series analysis, can be pretty challenging. Data volume, training time for models, how do you turn this around quickly? We use a combination of technologies for some of these use cases. Watson Studio running on power hardware with GPUs. So the idea here is you can cut down your model training time dramatically and we saw that as part of the-- >> Talk about how that works because this is something that we're seeing people move from manual to automated machine learning and deep learning, it give you augmented assistance to get this to the market. How does it actually work? >> So there is a training part of this, and then there is the operationalizing part of this, right? At the training part itself, you have a challenge, which is you're dealing with very large data volumes, you're dealing with training times that need to be shrunk down. And having a platform that allows you to do that, so you build models quickly, your data science folks can iterate through model creation very quickly is essential. But then, once the models have been built, how do you operationalize those models? How do you actually invoke the models at scale? How do you do workflow management of those models? How do you make sure that a certain exposure model is not thrashing some other models that are also essential to the business? How do you do policies and workflow management? >> And on top of that, we need to be very transparent, right? If the model is used to make certain decisions that have obvious impact financially on the bottom line, and an auditor comes back and says, "Okay, you made this trade so and so, why? What was happening at that time?" So we need to be able to capture and snapshot and understand what the model was doing at that particular instant in time, and go back and understand the inputs that went into that model and made it operate the way it did. >> It can't be a black box. >> It cannot be, yeah. >> Holistically, you got to look at the time series in real time, when things were happening and happened, happening, and then holistically tie that together. Is that kind of the impact analysis? >> We have to make our regulars happy. (laughing) That's number one, and we have to make our traders happy. We, as quantitative researchers, we're the ones that give them the hard math and the models, and then they use it. They use their own skillsets too to apply them, but-- >> What's the biggest needs that your stakeholders on the trading side want, and what's the needs on the compliance side, the traders want more, they want to move quickly? >> They're coming from different sides of it. Traders want to make more money, right? And they want to make decisions quickly. They want all the tools to tell them what to do, and for them to exercise whatever they normally exercise-- >> They want a competitive advantage. >> They want that competitive advantage, and they're also... we've got algo-trades as well, we want to have the best algo behind our trading. >> And the regulator side, we just want to make sure laws aren't broken, that there's auditing-- >> We use the phrase, "model explainability," right? Can you explain how the model came to a conclusion, right? Can you make sure that there is no bias in the model? How can you ensure the models are fair? And if you can detect there is a drift, what do you do to correct that? So that is very important. >> Do you have means of detecting sort of misuse of the model? Is that part of the governance process? >> That is exactly what Morpheus is doing. The unique thing about Morpheus is that we're tied into the risk management systems in the investment bank. We're actually running the same exact code that's pricing these trades, and what that brings is the ability to really understand pretty much the full stack trace of what's going into the price of a trade. We also have captured the restrictions and the conditions. It's in the Python script, it's essentially Python. And we can marry the two, and we can do all the checks that the governance person indicated we should be doing, and so we know, okay, if this trade is operating beyond maturity or a certain maturity, or beyond a certain expiry, we'll know that, and then we'll tag that information. >> And just for clarification, Morpheus is the name of the platform that does the-- >> Morpheus is the name of the model risk platform that I'm building out, yes. >> A final question for you, what's the biggest challenge that you guys have seen from a complexity standpoint that you're solving? What's the big complex... You don't want to just be rubber-stamping models. You want to solve big problems. What are the big problems that you guys are going after? >> I have many big problems. (laughing) >> Opportunities. >> The one that is right now facing me, is the problem of metadata, data ingestion, getting disparate sources, getting different disparate data from different sources. One source calls it a delta, this other source calls it something else. We've got a strategic data warehouse, that's supposed to take all of these exposures and make sense out of it. I'm in the middle because they're there, probably at the ten-year roadmap, who knows? And I have a one-month roadmap, I have something that was due last week and I need to come up with these regulatory reports today. So what I end up doing is a mix of a tactical strategic data ingestion, and I have to make sense of the data that I'm getting. So I need tools out there that will help support that type of data ingestion problem that will also lead the way towards the more strategic one, where we're better integrated with this-- >> John, talk about how you solve the problems? What are some of the things that you guys do? Give the plug for IBM real quick, 'cause I know you guys got the Studio. Explain how you guys are helping and working with JP Morgan Chase. >> Yeah, I touched upon this briefly earlier, which is from the model training perspective, Watson Studio running on Power hardware is very powerful, in terms of cutting down training time, right? But you've got to go beyond model building to how do you operationalize these models? How do I deploy these models at scale? How do I define workload management policies for these models, and connecting to their backbone. So that is part of this, and model explainability, we touched upon that, to eliminate this problem of how do I ingest data from different sources without having to manually oversee all of that. We need to manually apply auto-classification at the time of ingestion. Can I capture metadata around the model and reconcile data from different data sources as the data is being brought in? And can I apply ML to solve that problem, right? There is multiple applications of ML along this workflow. >> Talk about real quick, comment before we break, I want to get this in, machine learning has been around for a while now with compute and scale. It really is a renaissance in AI, it's great things are happening. But what feeds machine learning is data, the cleaner the data, the better the AI, the better the machine learning, so data cleanliness now has to be more real-time, it's less of a cleaning group, right? It used to be clean the data, bring it in, wrangle it, now you got to be much more agile, use speed of compute to make sure that you're qualifying data before it comes in, these machine learning. How do you guys see that rolling out, is that impacting you now? Are you thinking about it? How should people think about data quality as an input in machine learning? >> Well, I think the whole problem of setting up an application properly for data science and machine learning is really making sure that from the beginning, you're designing, and you're thinking about all of these problems of data quality, if it's the speed of ingestion, the speed of publication, all of that stuff. You need to think about the beginning, set yourself up to have the right elements, and it may not all be built out, and that's been a big strategy I've had with Morpheus. I've had a very small team working on it, but we think ahead and we put elements of the right components in place so data quality is just one of those things, and we're always trying to find the right tool sets that will enable use to do that better, faster, quicker. One of the things I'd like to do is to upscale and uplift the skillsets on my team, so that we are building the right things in the system from the beginning. >> A lot of that's math too, right? I mean, you talk about classification, getting that right upfront. Mathematics is-- >> And we'll continue to partner with Elenita and her team on this, and this helps us shape the direction in which our data science offerings go because we need to address complex enterprise challenges. >> I think you guys are really onto something big. I love the elite program, but I think having the small team, thinking about the model, thinking about the business model, the team model before you build the technology build-out, is super important, that seems to be the new model versus the old days, build some great technology and then, we'll put a team around it. So you see the world kind of being a little bit more... it's easier to build out and acquire technology, than to get it right, that seems to be the trend here. Congratulations. >> Thank you. >> Thanks for coming on. I appreciate it. theCUBE here, CUBE Conversations here. We're live in San Francisco, IBM Think. I'm John Furrier, Dave Vellante, stay with us for more day two coverage. Four days we'll be here in the hallway and lobby of Moscone North, stay with us.
SUMMARY :
covering IBM Think 2019, brought to you by IBM. and Director of the Data Science Elite Team... known for being on the bleeding edge sometimes, Absolutely. Well, first of all, thank you very much the problems, opportunities, for you guys. "what is the best thing to throw at it?" You bring in the best and you just jump in, Yeah, so the Data Science Elite Team was setup and the restrictions around what to do, and make the whole workflow efficient. This is all the use-- Now, it's the job of my team to take what they say, so when you get the model right, you can deploy it, There's the ability to monitor a model You guys look at the quantification of those kinds So quantifying the risks correctly "In the money business, you want the best nerds." So the idea here is you can cut down it give you augmented assistance to get this to the market. At the training part itself, you have a challenge, and made it operate the way it did. Is that kind of the impact analysis? and then they use it. and for them to exercise whatever they normally exercise-- and they're also... we've got algo-trades as well, what do you do to correct that? that the governance person indicated we should be doing, Morpheus is the name of the model risk platform What are the big problems that you guys are going after? I have many big problems. The one that is right now facing me, is the problem What are some of the things that you guys do? to how do you operationalize these models? is that impacting you now? One of the things I'd like to do is to upscale I mean, you talk about classification, because we need to address complex enterprise challenges. the team model before you build the technology build-out, of Moscone North, stay with us.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Elenita Elinon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Manuela Veloso | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
JP Morgan Chase | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
San Francisco | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one-month | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John Thomas | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ten-year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Quantitative Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two things | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
JP Morgan | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Four days | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Elenita | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second phase | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Moscone North | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Quantitative Research Analytics | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Morpheus | PERSON | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
Python | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Quantitative Group | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
IBM Think | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
Model Governance Organization | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
two great guests | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
four days | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
million dollars | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
millions of dollars | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.95+ |
AI Research Organization | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
CMU | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
One source | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.92+ |
Watson Studio | TITLE | 0.92+ |
Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
Morpheus | TITLE | 0.89+ |
Data Science Elite | ORGANIZATION | 0.86+ |
hundred person | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Data Science | ORGANIZATION | 0.83+ |
two hats | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
about 700-plus | QUANTITY | 0.79+ |
2019 | TITLE | 0.79+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
day | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
Think | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.66+ |
Program | OTHER | 0.65+ |
Think 2019 | TITLE | 0.56+ |
SWAT | ORGANIZATION | 0.52+ |
IBM | TITLE | 0.43+ |
Elite | TITLE | 0.38+ |
Jeff McMillan, Morgan Stanley | MIT CDOIQ 2018
>> Live from the MIT campus in Cambridge, Massachusetts, it's theCUBE, covering the 12th annual MIT Chief Data Officer and Information Quality Symposium. Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. >> Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of MIT's CDOIQ. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight, along with my cohost, Peter Burris. We're joined by Jeff McMillan. He is the managing director at Morgan Stanley. Well, thanks so much for coming on theCUBE, Jeff. >> Thanks for having me, it's great to be here. >> So you were just on a panel that was discussing the challenges and the opportunities of the CDO today. I mean, it is a mark of where the CDO role is, just by virtue of the fact that so many corporations are putting it front and center in their organizations. >> Yeah, I think what's interesting, though, is it is bit of a solution in search of a problem, and what I find the biggest challenge that many of these people are facing is that data in and of itself solves nothing, right? Unless you actually say, what business problem am I trying to solve, is it a risk problem, is it an efficiency play, is it a customer service issue, and then building your data solutions in support of that. Too many people start their journey by hiring 400 people, and they create data lineages and they have to create a dictionary and they put all these structures in place, and most of them fail, because they actually didn't figure out what they're solving for, and often times, very elegant and small solutions can actually drive a lot of positive outcomes, but the biggest mistake that, and we actually just discussed this on the panel, is knowing what you're solving for is the first step to be a successful chief data officer. >> Well, investments in infrastructure before outcomes fail no matter what they are, right? So whether it's an infrastructure of doing data analytics better, as you said, a whole bunch of clusters and a whole bunch of metadata management and other stuff, if it's not applied to some end, it's not going to get adopted. So we like to think we were talking in the opening thing, that one of the things that a chief data officer needs to do is acculturate the business to the idea of data being an asset, something that can be applied to work. And it's interesting in part because data can also help you choose what work you should apply it to. So talk a little bit about that. Does that resonate with you? >> I would totally agree with that, and it's not different, like when the first person created a business 2,000 years ago, somewhere along the line they said they needed somebody to keep track of the money, right? And the chief financial officer role sort of emerged, and then we had this thing where people actually came to work every day and they weren't really well trained and didn't understand their responsibilities, so we created the head of human resources. And I think these functions have evolved because as the business model grows, you need to have people to drive specific skills and competencies around these areas. And the truth is, in most organizations, we don't treat data like an asset. And part of it is the machinery, it's getting your Hadoop clusters up and putting your data meta and all that stuff. >> Or we confuse the assets of the technology with the assets that drive business value. >> That's right, and when people fail, it is rarely because they couldn't get the right data quality controls in place. They fail because they didn't get the right engagement model, and they didn't get the left hand and the right hand talking together, and at the core, data is not a data problem, it's an organizational problem. >> So there is this lack of consensus about where the CDO should sit, what his or her responsibilities mandate, scope, what do you think is the answer here? >> Well, we just got off the panel, and this was actually hotly debated, and there were two views on this that were highly divergent. >> But none of the other panelists are here today. >> Yeah, so my view's the right view. (laughter) Actually, I'll lay out both arguments. One of my colleagues on the panel was really driving this tech-focused approach, and her argument, which has some matter in fairness, is that so much of data is about the technology and the interplay and also the knowledge and the expertise and appreciation. You know, technology's been dealing with this problem for 25 years. No one was actually listening to them, right? So there is tremendous knowledge and expertise built up there. I took the other side of the equation, and I worked for the co-heads of our business, because it's not about the technology. And again, the challenges and the barriers to success are not technical in nature, it's leadership. And one thing that's interesting about data, and the reason that people have such a hard time with it, is that the problem and the solution to the problem often sit in two different cost centers. So getting somebody else to care about a problem that impacts you, when it actually doesn't drive your outcomes, is really hard, and that requires leadership and it requires collaboration. And sitting in a technology organization, by the way, I work with terrific technology folks, so this is not a disparagement on them, but sitting under the co-heads of the business, I am able to have those conversations with the other leaders of the business, and say listen, I know that you don't care about this, but for the best interest of the organization, we have to make these investments and let me explain, and those people think more holistically 'cause they're solving for the enterprise as opposed to their individual piece of technology. >> Which really is kind of you said, it requires leadership and it requires collaboration, but that also is one of the fundamental orientation of what great strategy should be. It's a way of cohering the mental model, getting everybody to agree on what the outcome and what the objective needs to be. >> Totally, and by the way, for those of us who are around in the late 90s. >> Not me! (laughter) >> When everyone hired the head of Internet strategy. This feels very much the same way, right? Everyone built websites and they had straight through processing and they sort of woke up a year and a half later, and they said, how has this gotten better? And they said oh, maybe we actually need to connect it to our infrastructure. >> I'll date myself. I remember when these conversations about whether or not we had a CIL, when we had a head of DP within HR, we had a head of DP within accounting, and there was whoa, what are we, the chief is responsible from my perspective, and I'd like to hear what you have to say, a chief anything is responsible for getting a return on the assets that are entrusted to them. >> Yeah, and that is 100% true. That being said, where you make your money is in the businesses, and I think to be really good at this job, you have to be very humble. And you can't make it about you and your goals and objectives, 'cause I have no goals and objectives outside of the goals and objectives of the business that I support. And part of what a lot of the challenge that people have, is they want to build empires, and I actually, I said to my boss, I have declared success when I'm an organization of one, because what I've been able to done is I've been able to set up the right controls, I've got the right people on the right jobs who understand, and the right technology, but the innovation is happening. It doesn't happen to my group. It happens away from my group. It happens when that 23-year-old who has got, with six weeks of visualization training, is sitting at 10 o'clock at night, figures out a better way to sell a municipal bond, because they spent 100 of their hours working on that. It's democratizing access to that, and it's really finding that right balance between control, ensuring the right data quality's in place, but also giving people the ability to innovate, and I think that's the perfect inflection point where you want to be. >> So what is the answer here? How would you give this remedy to other organizations in terms of the best practices that have emerged, and how to do this and do it right? >> Well, first and foremost, you got to know what your strategy is. I was on a panel with GE and General Motors. Their goals and objectives are very different than my goals and objectives. So don't leave this conference because Jeff McMillan did it this way at Morgan Stanley, and assume that that's the right answer for you. I think you have to first ask yourself, what are the most important objectives, and what is your strategy, 'cause the other thing I find is, you ask that question, a lot of businesses, even in this world in which, 2018, we talk about all the time, they don't have a clearly articulated strategy. And unless you have a strategy, putting data on the back end of that is not going to solve the problem. So first and foremost, you got to have a strategy. And then secondly, you got to put the right technical infrastructure in, there's a lot of plumbing that goes into this, and I'm going to gloss over it, but it's really important, and then you got to put the right organizational structure in place. I actually don't believe that you create a different parallel committee around this. The way we do it at our firm is we actually, the existing executive committee, is responsible for this, it's an additional function of them. We report into that function, and then you say, what is your business goals and objectives? Figure out where the gaps are, and then spend the time, money, and resources to solve and focus on that, and do it one problem at a time, and in doing that, you start to build this, what I'll describe as a data-centric or decision-centric culture. >> We call it data first, and so the way we tend to think about it, and I want to bounce this off of you is, you know, what's your business, what are the activities, the outcomes that are necessary to perform that business, what activities are necessary to achieve those outcomes, what data is necessary to perform those activities? >> That's right. >> Does that kind of follow? >> 100%, and also what processes, 'cause the other thing is that you talk to the data consultants, it's all about the data. And then you talk to the process consultants about the process, it's all about all of those things, and the point is that the data is the piece that sits, but there are many factors that influence that. Sometimes it's a data quality program. Sometimes it's a training program. Sometimes it's a technology issue. Sometimes it's a vendor supply issue. There's a whole host of reasons, and really the question is how do you use the data as the rallying point to say, this is the objective source of truth, and where is that objective source of truth, either not from a quality perspective, or from a business perspective, how does it impact those business, and always going back to that thing, 'cause there's truth in that attribute. >> And is that a culture issue? >> Well, it's a process of the technology, and it ultimately is a culture. And it's going back to the original comment, is do you see data as a problem, or do you see data as an opportunity? And I would argue, and I'm not going to speak for other companies, but in the world of finance, we live in bits, zeroes and ones, right? We are an information based business at the core, that happens to be delivering a financial services product. And in that world, that is our competitive advantage. I have a database of every single transaction that every client has ever given with us at Morgan Stanley. I know your risk tolerance level. I know where you live, I know whether you have children. That is a powerful source of knowledge, that if harnessed appropriately, allows to deliver a far, far superior solution to our clients and what they were getting previously. >> Great, well Jeff, thanks so much for coming on the show. It's really fun talking to you. >> Yeah, thank you so much. >> I'm Rebecca Knight. For Peter Burris, we will have more from MIT's CDOIQ coming up just after this.
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. He is the managing it's great to be here. of the CDO today. and they have to create a dictionary the business to the idea And part of it is the machinery, assets of the technology and the right hand talking and this was actually hotly debated, But none of the other and the barriers to success is one of the fundamental orientation Totally, and by the and they said, how has this gotten better? and I'd like to hear what you have to say, and objectives of the and then you got to put and the point is that the Well, it's a process of the technology, much for coming on the show. For Peter Burris, we will
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Peter Burris | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeff McMillan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jeff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
General Motors | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Morgan Stanley | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
25 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six weeks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
MIT | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two views | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
400 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cambridge, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 o'clock | DATE | 0.99+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
a year and a half later | DATE | 0.99+ |
late 90s | DATE | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first step | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
one problem | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
2,000 years ago | DATE | 0.95+ |
both arguments | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
first person | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
MIT Chief Data Officer and Information Quality Symposium | EVENT | 0.94+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
single transaction | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
23-year-old | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
CDOIQ | ORGANIZATION | 0.8+ |
two different | QUANTITY | 0.76+ |
CDO | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
secondly | QUANTITY | 0.72+ |
One of my colleagues | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
CDOIQ | EVENT | 0.69+ |
12th annual | QUANTITY | 0.66+ |
night | DATE | 0.56+ |
Blake Morgan, Author | CUBE Conversations Jan 2018
(lively music) >> Hello, and welcome to a special CUBE Conversation here in Palo Alto studios of theCUBE, I am John Furrier, the co-founder of SiliconANGLE Media and also the co-host of theCUBE. We are here with Blake Morgan, who is the futurist, author, speaker, around the concept of customer experience, and has a great new book out called, More is More. Blake, Welcome to theCUBE Conversation. >> Thank you John. >> Thanks for coming in. So I love that it is a hard cover book, the book is great, it feels good, the pages, it's a really good read, but it's got a lot of meaty topics in there. So let's just jump in, what's the motivation for the book? Why the book? Why More is More? >> So I have been in the contact center space for over 10 years and basically everyone under the sun is a customer and we all know what it feels like to have a bad customer experience. Have you had a bad customer experience ever? >> John: Oh yes. >> Yeah, right. >> So there is no shortage of work to be done in this space. I think now it's a great time to be in customer experience because there is more awareness about what it actually means. So, I wrote the book to basically provide some kind of definition and to really help people understand, What is customer experience?. Is it customer service? No, it's not. So what does it mean? How can businesses improve customer experience and what do they need to know to get started? >> How about the evolution? Because you know digital has really changed the game. You are seeing cloud computing, machine learning, AI techniques, bots certainly. I mean Twitter came out over ten years ago. I remember when Comcast Cares came out, you know that was a revolution. It was this one guy who decided to be on Twitter. We saw that beginning of that, that trend, where you can now serve and touch folks with customer service and experience, but then again, the blinds between customer experience and customer experience is blurring. Now those multiple channels, do you send them a Snapchat? Do you Instagram? All kinds of new things are emerging, so how do you define, as a frame, the customer experience in this new context? >> Yeah, you're right, there are so many channels. It's really overwhelming for a lot of businesses. So I think it is important to really cut out the noise to think about, Who are you as a business?, and Who is your customer?. What does your customer need? And I really encourage businesses to make their life harder to make it easier on the customer, because in so many situations, companies make it easier on themselves and make it harder on their customers. For example, say you do tweet a company, they might tell you, Hey, now you need to call us and repeat yourself or Now you need to send us an email. Well that's not easy for me as the customer. So it's really all about making customers' lives easier and better. That's the name of the game. >> So what was the findings in the book, when you did the research for the book, what was the core problem that companies are facing? Was it understanding customer experience? Was it the re imagining of customer experience? Was it just a strategic imperative? What was the problem that you uncovered that was the core to this new customer experience equation? >> So a lot of people equate customer experience with customer service and that's a big problem because for most companies, customer service is a cost center. It's not a revenue generating arm of the business. It's not exciting, it's not a money maker, it's not marketing or sales, and so that is really what people think of, when they think of customer experience. But the book is based on this DO MORE framework and DO MORE is basically represents as an acronym. Each piece of the six piece framework represents a different piece of where customer experience lives. So the first D is design something special. The second, I'm not going to read you every, I'm not going to bore you every single word, but the second is about loving your employees, so that is a part of it too. So culture, modernizing with technology, obsessing over your customers, having a culture of customer centricity and embracing innovation and disruption. So these are all varying pieces of DO MORE, which really helps companies understand, it's not simply something that sits in the contact center. For example, let's say you've got your laptop here, and you love your laptop, but your experience of the laptop is not only shaped by, say you have to contact the call center, it is also shaped by how that laptop was built and how about those people who built the laptop. Were they fighting at work with each other? Did they like their jobs? Did they like their boss? Honestly, that's going to impact your experience. >> Yeah, was it a sweat shop. >> Was it a sweat shop? There you go. >> I mean there's all kind of issues about social good too kind of comes into it with that. >> It actually does, I write a lot about social good in my book and some really great CEOs today get that social good is important, like the CEO of Patagonia or Marc Benioff. I mean you can just rattle off so many examples of stuff that he's doing, whether it is equal pay for woman, or his huge house in Hawaii where he's housed monks, to help them when one of the monks had cancer actually. Salesforce is constantly doing good for it's employees and for the community at large. >> Take me through your view on how executives should think about customer experience with all the digital transformation, because a lot of business models are shifting, you are seeing mobile apps, changing the financial services market, because now the app is the teller. So you have three kinds of companies out there, you've got the customer service oriented company, like a Zappos, or you've got a tech company like Google, but they are all about product innovation. Then you've got companies like Apple and others, that are like the big brand and culture personalities, so you've got these three different kind of companies as an example, each one might have a different view on customer experience. How do you tie, how does an executive figure out how to match the more into their DNA? >> That's a fantastic question. I think it's important to have somebody accountable to it, whether it's a Chief Customer Officer or your CMO, because the CEO is ultimately responsible, however, the CEO has their hand in so many things, it's not scalable for them to be so involved on a granular level, on customer centric metrics and so on and so forth throughout the organization. So I would encourage a company to actually hire somebody who is accountable, who creates even tiger teams across the organization with these customer centric metrics in mind, so everybody is working together and they know their job, no matter if they are HR or finance or marketing or customer service, that their metrics, their performance metrics, are tied back to the customer satisfaction. >> I know you do a lot of talks and you do a lot of speeches out there and events, what's the common question that you get? I mean what are people really struggling with or what are they interested in, what are some of the things that you are hearing when you are out on the road giving talks? >> I think it's hard to actually put some of these practices, I think it's actually hard to put some of these ideas into practice. For example, I recently gave a talk at a large technology company down here in San Jose and I presented some pretty wild ideas about actually the energy for influencing change. So how do we keep that high level of stamina with our employees when it's just quite hard to sometimes even keep up. I remember I gave this speech, I talked about a lot of very eccentric ideas about self-management, like when you are a worker you need to take care of yourself because the corporation is never going to give you a pass to let's say, rest, or do what you need to do to feel good, to be good at work. I noticed some of the people in the audience were all texting each other and afterwards someone came up to me and said, you know we are all texting each other because you say these things and the speech was purchased by the leader of the company, however, when it comes to actually working here, that is not really the vibe here, that's not the culture. So I think that a lot of, even the best companies today, still struggle every single day with some of these ideas, because when you DO MORE, when you work harder than others, it's tiring, it can take it's toll on employees. So how do you keep people fresh? >> So fatigue is a huge issue. >> Fatigue, yes. It is an issue. >> So how do they solve that? Because again, that is an experience and the employees itself represent brands. >> Yeah. >> So what are some of the solutions for that? >> Yeah so it's normal that people in these big companies feel fatigued when they are working harder for the customer, but it is really important for people to just manage themselves because no one is going to give you permission to take ten minutes to go for a walk, take ten minutes to go meditate, so it's really about management providing the room for employees to breathe and also modeling it as an example, if leaders just worked 24/7, it's all about the grind, the grind, the grind, that's not a healthy culture, so they need to push their people, but also give them some kind of safety that they can take care of themselves as well. >> So talk about the book target. Who is the ideal candidate for the book? Who are you writing the book for? What do you hope to accomplish for the reader and the outcome? >> So I write for Forbes and Harvard Business Review and Hemispheres Magazine, I have a lot of different types of readers because customer experience really affects everybody in business. So it could be the CMO, it could be the Chief Customer Officer, it could be the CEO, in fact the CEO of 1-800-Flowers wrote the foreword for my book, Chris McCann. So this book is really relevant for a wide variety of people who are interested in making their company more competitive. >> That's a great point, so let's trill down on that, customer experience just doesn't end in a department, we've seen this in IT, information technology, it's a department that becomes now pervasive with cloud computing, you see social media out there, so customer experience has multiple touch points, hence the broad appeal, how should someone think about being the customer experience champion? Because you always have the champions that kind of drives the change, so you've got change agents and you have kind of to me, the pre-existing management in place, what's the human role in this? Because remember, you have machines out there, you have bots, and all those machine learning technology out there, it's important that the human piece is integral to this, right? I mean what's your view on the role of the person? >> Yeah I'm not anti-technology, I'm not anti-bot, I am excited about the Amazon Go cashier-less stores, Amazon Go stores, but I do feel that technology can help us without totally replacing us. I think that we need thoughtful people in charge of these technologies to lead us, to make smart decisions, but you can't just let the technology go. I think that can be really scary. We've definitely seen so many TV shows about this, you can't blink without seeing another TV show about robots taking over the world. >> So it's a concern. What's the biggest thing you've learned from the book? What was the key learnings for you, personally, when you wrote this book? >> Well, writing a book, there is a lot of learning. I actually had my daughter, I was pregnant while I wrote this book and so I think for me to be totally candid, it was a lesson in patience and working through that period for me being pregnant. So I was like giving birth to the book and an actual baby. To be totally truthful, that was my learning. >> You got a lot more than the book. >> Blake: Laughing >> Well, congratulations, how old is the baby? >> She's sixteen months. >> Congratulations, awesome. >> Thank you. >> Well thanks for coming in and sharing about More is More, Blake Morgan, futurist author on the customer experience, More is More, it's theCUBE Conversation and really an impactful thought because customer experience transcends not just a department, it really is a mindset, it's about culture, it's about a lot of things, and it's certainly in the digital revolution, it's really going to be fundamental. Thanks for sharing your thoughts. >> Blake: Thanks so much. >> Appreciate it. I am John Furrier here in the Palo Alto studios for CUBE Conversation, thanks for watching. (lively music)
SUMMARY :
and also the co-host of theCUBE. the book is great, it feels good, the pages, So I have been in the contact center space I think now it's a great time to be in customer experience so how do you define, as a frame, to think about, Who are you as a business?, it's not simply something that sits in the contact center. There you go. I mean there's all kind of issues and for the community at large. So you have three kinds of companies out there, because the CEO is ultimately responsible, because the corporation is never going to give you a pass It is an issue. and the employees itself represent brands. to give you permission to take ten minutes to go for a walk, So talk about the book target. So it could be the CMO, I am excited about the Amazon Go cashier-less stores, What's the biggest thing you've learned from the book? and so I think for me to be totally candid, and it's certainly in the digital revolution, I am John Furrier here in the Palo Alto studios
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Apple | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Chris McCann | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ten minutes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Blake | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
San Jose | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Hawaii | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Jan 2018 | DATE | 0.99+ |
sixteen months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Marc Benioff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Blake Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Each piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
six piece | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zappos | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
over 10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Patagonia | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
DO MORE | TITLE | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.96+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ | |
ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ | |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
Hemispheres Magazine | TITLE | 0.93+ |
More is | TITLE | 0.91+ |
Harvard Business Review | TITLE | 0.9+ |
Amazon Go | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
Snapchat | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
three different kind | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
every single word | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
More is More | TITLE | 0.83+ |
one guy | QUANTITY | 0.83+ |
1-800-Flowers | ORGANIZATION | 0.81+ |
over | DATE | 0.8+ |
single day | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
ten years ago | DATE | 0.8+ |
three kinds | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
Comcast Cares | ORGANIZATION | 0.68+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.64+ |
Forbes | ORGANIZATION | 0.55+ |
CUBE Conversation | EVENT | 0.5+ |
theCUBE Conversation | ORGANIZATION | 0.49+ |
companies | QUANTITY | 0.49+ |
Conversation | EVENT | 0.34+ |
Matt Morgan, Druva, Mike "Gus" Gustafson, Druva | AWS re:Invent
>> Narrator: Live from Las Vegas, it's the CUBE, covering AWS re:Invent 2017 presented by AWS, Intel, and our ecosystem of partners. >> Live here in Las Vegas is the CUBE's exclusive coverage of AWS re:Invent 2017, our fifth year of covering the massive growth of Amazon Web Services. I'm John Furrier, cofounder of SiliconANGLE Media, Inc. with my cohost, Keith Townsend, CTO advisor. We've got two amazing guests here from Druva, a hot startup, a hot company. Guss Gustafson is the executive chairman of the board, and Matt Morgan is the chief marketing officer at Druva. Been on the CUBE but many times. We've had you in the studio. You guys are doing extremely well. You've always got some news for us, always executing. You are like the Amazon of your sector. You've always got stuff going on, what's up? Tell us, share the news. >> Super excited about announcing a new technology, a new product line. It's called Druva Apollo, and Druva Apollo basically completes the cloud data protection story, so as you guys know, we've wrapped endpoints with data protection and data management, and we call it data management as a service. We've wrapped servers with the data management as a service. We took the data, we've protected within the cloud, but with Druva Apollo, what we've announced is cloud-to-cloud data protection, meaning that data that's born inside an EC2 existence, for example, can be wrapped with the same data protection and management as we do for endpoints and the servers. It really is an extension of the platform. Now you can start looking at the data holistically, any data, no matter if it's on the endpoint, the server, or now, within the cloud can be protected within the same controlled data set, getting the full global D2 technology, plus the governance and intelligence capability. I'm really excited about this announcement. >> Now, I want to ask a question on that, because one of the things we talked about in the past on is the cloud has changed the game around perimeter, no more perimeter. >> Right. >> There is no wall from the cloud, a lot of holes to get in there if you are a hacker, but you have a product leadership, but and ease-of-use. One of the things that the cloud is the ability to acquire the resources, right? The server list is out there, how do you guys compete in this now potentially data protection-less world, or is that a term? I mean, you've got to be seamless, but you've got to have good tech. How do you guys do both of those? >> I think you actually just underscore the paradigm shift that's happening. We used to think of data being localized to a server, to a machine, and you had to protect that machine. You wanted to, quote, backup hard drive if you will. Well, data is now in a serverless environment. It's in the air, it's in the cloud, it's tied to applications that may or may not be running within a specific instance. You don't have the control factors, right? >> John: Or some other database. >> That's exactly right. >> Mobile databases now. >> That's exactly the point, right? What we are doing is, because we are stateless, because we exist on these multiple planes, you can have a much more universal conversation around data protection and management, but there is another big "ah-hah" about moving to the cloud for data protection and management, and it's all about ease-of-use and simplicity. Now with a single login, with a single set of credentials, I can access and search across massive data sets that could contain all my endpoints, or it could contain multiple servers, or now it can contain cloud-to-cloud data protected instances. This is a very big deal. Think about the past. If I was a classic hardware acquisition play where I purchased specific silos of data storage or secondary storage, I needed to manage each and every one, and there could be hundreds. I would need to manage hundreds of logins. I had to keep them all up to date. All of that is gone with Druva. >> Let's talk about user experience. This is a developer-focused conference. >> Matt: Totally. >> I'm amazed at the number of shorts and hoodies I've seen (laughing) At a proper enterprise conference. >> John: It's a developer conference turned enterprise. >> Yes, developer conference-- >> Not an enterprise conference. (talking over each other) unlike everybody else. >> The infrastructure company having a hackerthon, for example, but developers don't care about servers. They care about data and interacting with that data. >> Matt: That's right. >> What is the developer experience for recovering and protecting data within Druva? Do they have to go through some backup grandfather-son, son-father set up to back up data? What is the experience? >> There are some vendors that actually still require that. (laughing) Some of them have acted like it's a breakthrough to put it in an appliance, but at the end of the day, it's the same conversation. It's just a localized piece of hardware. Druva's conversation is very different. Data protection is all about where that date is going to be managed and stored, and how you connect it up to the service. By being stateless, we've created an entire architecture that allows all of that data to be collected centrally. Once it's there, the developer has the capability to access it, but the real value comes on the governance side, and on the legal side, so if I'm in a situation where I need to manage critical corporate IP, and know it's protected, and and now I have an audit trail on that data, who has touched it, what they did with it, where it was copied. I have that information. I can search for that information. So it moves a little bit beyond a classic developer point of view and extends that data control to the other players. >> Gus, I want to get your take on this because you are the chairman of the board, but also you have a lot of industry experience. We are seeing a shift in the business now where scale of the cloud is causing a lot of disruption. You guys are taking advantage of it at Druva, but also you are seeing some deviants in Silicon Valley, in our backyard. You've got startups that were born before 2012 with the "go big or go home" attitude, Andreessen Horowitz in Sequoia writing fat checks, $100 million. They can't scale up to compete against this other scale. They got out-scaled, so they end up getting acquired, you know, accu-hired. Barracuda's going private. A gem in the valley, great company, no cloud strategy, so scale is dessimating and creating value at the same time. How should businesses look at this business model paradigm shift where it's not go big or go home, it's find a spot in the ecosystem (laughing) and milk it, or get a position. You can't compete. It's hard to compete against scale. >> Scale, you are right, the whole scale paradigm has now gone from-- it's beyond comprehension, to be honest with you. I think the other thing that we've learned, and this is how Druva looks at this, you can't compress experience. You can't compress learning and application of learning, and so for eight years plus we've been at this game thinking about scale, and in some cases, to be quite blunt, we experience it with our customers because there is no predetermined path in a lot of these things, but for companies of scale today, I think you would have to have a cloud-first mentality. That's what Druva brought to the party. I think we are seeing a lot of people that have looked at this and said, "How do I actually get all the way over here?" Our message is really simple. Let's just get started. Whatever applications or use cases it is to get started, whether it is endpoint, whether it's a server, cloud apps, but we've thought about and built the vision around the entire end-to-end strategy, so we will bump into things at scale. We will figure out how to handle those. We recently brought on board a customer with 75,000 employees, another one with another 50,000, and we've done this before, but those are new layers of scale. >> John : You guys are taking a pragmatic approach. >> We are. >> You guys aren't trying to overbuild, get over your skis, or whatever people call it, but don't create a situation where there is diseconomies. Leverage what you've got, and know your place in the world. >> If you don't mind, I'll just make a comment on the funding round we just received. We just received $80 million in net new funds. It was a preemptive interest in investing in the company. Quite honestly, we could have potentially taken more, but the focuses are on executing what we can actually do today. >> More discipline too. The less capital you take-- >> There is that. >> The more discipline. >> There is that, but you know when you think about the growth and the opportunity, in large part for us, it's all about staying pragmatic-focused and executing well on what is ahead of us. >> The product market fit is always one they talk about with the funding, but also it's the sales channels. If you try to compete with sales, say Amazon for instance, others have tried, it's hard. I know a few companies getting bought up by private equity left and right because they just, size wise, can never get there. >> Gus: Right. >> You guys are inside the tornado, as Jeffrey Moore would say, which is kind of the strategy for you guys. You get in the cloud, you've got product discipline. How is it going on the sales side? What are some of the metrics you are seeing? Any success metrics you can share customer success? >> Yeah, absolutely, and you know for us, AWS is a strategic partner and a great partner in terms of the alliance that we have around bring in net new customers to the cloud, working with them, et cetera, so in the last six months we've added 300 net new enterprise customers. That brings our total to well over 4,000 enterprise customers, and we've done that by, again, staying very focused around that first bite, a very simple approach, and then once people start, they see how simple it is, so you had asked about the developer experience, Keith, it is so simple. In some cases what we say in their actual experience is they don't believe us. When Matt was talking about the "ah-hah" moment, once they experience it, they continue to build, and build, and build. >> So the developers, again, we've talked about this because we are at a developer conference, they just want to solve problems. One of the things that we've always kind of harped on developers about, and Matt, you talked about this a little bit with governance, with data governance, GDPR is coming to be fully enforced May of next year. >> Matt: That's right. >> Very serious consequences for companies that don't kind of handle that. Have you guys seen an uptick in conversations around GDPR with customers and how Druva helps to mitigate some of the challenges around GDPR? >> Keith, one of the most amazing things that's come out of GDPR is the rise of this new executive persona, the chief data protection officer. >> John: Oh, another one! >> For a vendor that's in the data protection business, it is wonderful to have a C-level executive responsible for the value that we deliver. >> Some of the penalties is 4% of revenue. >> How many chiefs will there be these days? >> Well that is true, there are a lot of chiefs. >> There's a lot of chiefs in the kitchen. >> There are a lot of chiefs. >> More than Indians. Oh you guys are the-- >> Yeah, I'm going to defend the chief data protection officer. >> Keith: Yeah, we will keep that one. >> I'll keep that one. (laughing) You keep in mind that the risks that people are dealing with, and GDPR is an extension of extending individual rights to the data sets that are collected on them. The idea of the right to be forgotten. >> You guys have challenges not even within the customers, the external customers, but an organization with 75,000 users, they have rights in themselves, so there is this differentiation between protect internal corporate data and that policy, and keeping that data. If I'm a developer searching for data, I'm just searching for data, so how do I control, what's the controls available for making sure that that doesn't go afoul of GDPR? >> Absolutely, so we have phenomenal security capabilities that are built into our product both from an identification point of view giving rights and privileges, as well as protecting that data from any third-party access. All of this information is going to be compliant with these regulations beyond GDPR. There is enormous regulations around data that require us to keep our security levels as high as we go. In fact, we would argue that AWS itself is now typically more secure, more secure than your classic data set. >> Yeah, they've done the work. >> So we are building on top of the AWS security framework which gives you even better security, and because, this is important, it's off-site, logically by conception of the cloud, we also add immutability, so when you think about ransomware, ransomware is not going to crawl up to the cloud in the classic way that you would have the type of infections that have happened. Druva is going to give you the capability to ensure that that data is whole, and you can recover from those types of malware attacks. It's a little bit of a pivot from GDPR, but I think all of this stuff around data risks are related. >> Talking about the government, public sector market, you guys just got FedRAMP approved. >> Yes. >> It's a big certification. Congratulations. >> Thank you. >> What does that mean for your business? More customers coming in on the public-sector side? >> Public-sector is off the charts for us. The FedRAMP ATO certification, we are the only data protection vendor that has that, and it gives us the capability to qualify for data protection possibilities within the public-sector. I don't know if, Gus, you want to comment anymore on that. >> John: Visa cross is gonna love that. >> It's a massive market opportunity. It also puts you at a higher level in terms of, obviously, the security capabilities that they went through and tested to give us the ATO, which is the authority to operate in the FedRAMP sector. It opens up a tremendous amount of opportunity. When you look at, kind of, the Fortune one as far as US government, this is a massive opportunity for us. >> Well, save the date in Washington DC. This morning they announced the AWS Public Sector Summit on June 20th and 21st. The CUBE will be there. I've got the verbal. Well, we already have the deal with Theresa Carlson. The CUBE will be there probably with two sets too. That's turned into a re:Invent. It grew from a hotel room two years ago, to a ball room, to now the convention center, and they're expecting again, this year in DC, Amazon Public Sector Summit, everything, nonprofits, gov cloud, huge. >> Yeah, it's amazing. AWS has become the 21st-century operating system, and at first it was for individuals or small businesses, but now it is the enterprise. Look around, right? We are all re-platforming, if you will, to be able to provide this architecture as the best possibility. >> So you're betting on Amazon? >> Absolutely. >> Other clouds? >> So we are a multi-cloud provider. We have a solution that also runs on Microsoft Dejour. There's lots of customers that choose Dejour. They are Microsoft customers. They're customers that enjoy the different data centers that Microsoft offers, but the vast majority of our customers really embrace the AWS solution. >> You'll protect whatever the customer needs. Whatever environment they have, you'll support the major platforms? >> We're gonna support either one, and you've got to realize the idea of different data centers that are localized to different countries give you different soverignty options with Microsoft you may not get with AWS, at least not today. >> Yeah, and same with Google too. Google has not a big presence outside the US. >> That's right. >> So they're limited. >> So data protection is starting to become a catch-all term. The, what, $80 million in funding the last round? >> Gus: Yes. >> It's not just about data protection, but now multi-cloud data mobility. Being able to take my data, my hybrid IT data and move it to where I need to move it to. Can you talk about Druva's capability when it comes to data mobility? >> One of the most popular use cases of the acquisition of the Druva technology is all around MNA. The opportunity to bring in data from a variety of different endpoints and bring their customers new companies that are being acquired into the fold. You have all kinds of governance capabilities you could do on that data, and you could prevent the typical data leakage. The employee turnover, where people basically walk out the door. They take their hard drive with them, or take the computer. It's not being tracked, and you don't know what data was there, and you can't track it. With Druva, you have that data. They can take the hard drive. You know exactly what they took. You have information, and you have saved that IP for the company, and you gained that. If I'm acquiring a company, that information obviously is important to me. >> Thanks Gus, thanks for coming on the CUBE, thanks for the update. Congratulations on all the business success and public sector is right around the corner as well, another growing market. Back up and recovery data protection is hot in the cloud, it's hard to do. These guys have got a great solution in Druva. It's the CUBE bringing you more live coverage. We're taking a short break. We'll be right back with our next guest. Stay with us.
SUMMARY :
it's the CUBE, and Matt Morgan is the chief marketing officer at Druva. any data, no matter if it's on the endpoint, the server, because one of the things we talked about in the past on is a lot of holes to get in there if you are a hacker, It's in the air, it's in the cloud, That's exactly the point, right? This is a developer-focused conference. I'm amazed at the number of shorts and hoodies I've seen Not an enterprise conference. They care about data and interacting with that data. and on the legal side, We are seeing a shift in the business now where and in some cases, to be quite blunt, and know your place in the world. but the focuses are on executing The less capital you take-- the growth and the opportunity, but also it's the sales channels. What are some of the metrics you are seeing? and a great partner in terms of the alliance that we have One of the things that we've always kind of and how Druva helps to mitigate some of the challenges is the rise of this new executive persona, for the value that we deliver. Oh you guys are the-- the chief data protection officer. The idea of the right to be forgotten. the external customers, All of this information is going to be compliant Druva is going to give you the capability Talking about the government, public sector It's a big certification. Public-sector is off the charts for us. in the FedRAMP sector. I've got the verbal. but now it is the enterprise. They're customers that enjoy the different data centers Whatever environment they have, that are localized to different countries Google has not a big presence outside the US. So data protection is starting to become a catch-all term. and move it to where I need to move it to. of the acquisition of the Druva technology is hot in the cloud, it's hard to do.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Keith | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jeffrey Moore | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Keith Townsend | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Theresa Carlson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Washington DC | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gus | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon Web Services | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$80 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
SiliconANGLE Media, Inc. | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$100 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
50,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Andreessen Horowitz | PERSON | 0.99+ |
eight years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
DC | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
4% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Guss Gustafson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
75,000 users | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
300 net | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
fifth year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
US | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mike "Gus" Gustafson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two sets | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
21st | DATE | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Druva | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
21st-century | DATE | 0.99+ |
June 20th | DATE | 0.98+ |
Druva | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
two years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
Intel | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
today | DATE | 0.97+ |
this year | DATE | 0.96+ |
two amazing guests | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first bite | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
over 4,000 enterprise customers | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Amazon Public Sector Summit | EVENT | 0.93+ |
hundreds of logins | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
FedRAMP | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Anjali Menon, Morgan Stanley | Grace Hopper 2017
(techno music) >> Narrator: Live from Orlando, Florida. It's the Cube. Covering Grace Hopper's Celebration of Women in Computing. Brought to you by Silicon Angle Media. >> Welcome back to the Cube's coverage of the Grace Hopper Conference here in Orlando, Florida. I'm your host Rebecca Knight. We're joined now by Anjali Menon. She is the VP of Technology at Morgan Stanley. Thanks so much for coming on the show. >> My pleasure to be here. >> So I'd love to just tell our viewers a little about your journey as a woman in technology who now works at an investment bank. >> Yes, absolutely. I think it's a very long journey, if you will. It started when I was seven years old. Back in my school we had an extra curricular computer science course, so I signed up for it. And I remember starting out as, you know, someone who was coding in basic. And, you know, it was just very simple things. You draw a line, draw a kite, watch it move across the screen. It was just so exciting for someone of that age. So, you know, I kept at it. I continued to enroll in the same course over the years. So, middle school, high school and then I did my undergraduate in computer science in engineering. And then in 2011 I graduated from NYU with a Masters in Computer Science. And, you know, Morgan Stanley was one of those companies that had showed up during on campus recruitment. And just the feedback that I had heard from my other peers who were already in the company, just, you know, about the work culture at Morgan Stanley. It was just really, really good. So, you know, I joined Morgan Stanley and right now I'm, you know, Assistant Owner. I own the Equities and Options order entry application. So I'm responsible for, you know, the overall design and development. So it's been a really exciting journey. To, uh, you know, Morgan Stanley, yep. >> So you as a woman in technology and now working in finance. >> Yes. >> I mean these are two very male dominated industries. >> Mm-hmm (affirmative) >> That are come together to provide your jobs. >> Yeah. >> How, what is it like to be a woman on the front lines? >> So, you know it's interesting, I fee like a lot of people have, you know, misconceptions about that. You know, about being a woman in tech. But we have a very diverse and inclusive culture at Morgan Stanley. Like I mentioned, I am Assistant Owner for the Equities and Options Order Entry Application. So, you know, when I'm sitting at a table with senior managers, because I'm the subject matter expertise, expert, it's great to, you know, look at them sit and listen to me talk because, you know, I'm the one who's bringing in the information. So it doesn't really matter if you're a woman or a man. What matters is, are you the one with the expertise? Are you the one with the talent, right? And they're going to sit up and listen to you irrespective of your gender. So, you know, that's just the culture at Morgan Stanley. So, uh, yep. >> So now, talking about the culture. And you are here, obviously, trying to recruit bright, young talent at the Grace Hopper Conference. >> Yes, yes. >> What are you hearing from potential employees? What are they looking for in a company? >> What are we looking for in students, or? >> I'm interested in both what Morgan Stanley wants to see out of perspective candidates. >> Mm-hmm (affirmative) >> But also what you're hearing from the recruits themselves in terms of how they want their job to fit into their lives. >> Absolutely, a lot of, one of the recurring questions that I do get when I'm interviewing students is, you know, how do you maintain the whole work life balance? Like you said, finance and tech. It's a very grueling industry, right? So how do you keep that balance? And what's really wonderful is that, you know, you don't have to sacrifice you personal life, or your passion projects, for your work. Me personally, uh me personally, for the last year I've been taking a lot of extra curricular courses. Non credit courses at NYU in film making and photography. Because that's just my passion project. I love telling stories, and I used to be a writer, and I was just looking to explore other mediums for telling stories. So in the last year, since the summer of 2016, I've been taking courses at NYU and it's just been such a great experience then, and I think Morgan Stanley sort of allows you to have that culture. Right? You have your nine to five job and during those hours you're very focused on what you're doing, but, you know, they do give you time outside of that to just, like, work on your passion projects. And it's great that I can find that balance between the two. >> So Morgan Stanley could be a choice employee, employer for a young woman looking for a work life balance. >> Oh, yeah, absolutely, absolutely. >> And now what are you looking for in a potential recruit? What are you telling the young women here at Grace Hopper? >> We are looking for women who are bright and very confident. I feel like all of the interviews that I've done in the last few days, I've met such wonderful young women. And it's really difficult to choose because everyone has their own area of expertise. And you can tell they're very, very intelligent. They love challenges, right? A lot of the questions that I ask are typically around, like, problem solving, and puzzles. And, it's great to see how they can approach it, and deconstruct it. So, it's been really difficult trying to find, it's been really difficult trying to choose one over the other because everyone is just so equally bright, yeah. >> So, how are you, how are you going about this recruitment process? What are, how are you assembling a diverse team? >> So we've been doing a lot of on the spot quizzes. So like once a day we have two problems that are presented. We have students stopping by and they're working it out. We're helping them through the process of, you know, figuring out the solution. And, you know, anyone who stands out, we're pulling them aside, scheduling interviews with them. We are actually also making offers on the spot as well. >> Oh wow, Okay. >> So, that's, that's been a new experience, so, yeah. It's been, we have a lot of interviews already scheduled as well, so , yeah. >> So when you're, in terms of your job, what are the things you are most excited about that you're working on? In terms of the real technical challenges that you're facing? >> Absolutely, so, I work within the capital market space and wealth management. Our clients are financial advisors, right, so, my job, when I came in three or four years ago, was, I wanted to enhance the order entry experience for the equities and options product. And essentially what we were looking to do was enable the FAs with the tool, that would enable them to do their jobs efficiently and quickly. So the last couple of years, we've been building an equities trading platform that would enable them to do just that. And it's just really exciting to see what the legacy system did and what the new system does and the progress that we've made. And we just hear really good feedback from the field as well. Like, our clients, the FAs, Financial Advisors, who are using the new system. It's great to hear things like, "Oh, I love that I can do my job so quickly. It's just like one or two clicks and I can do so much more than the legacy system.". So it's really exciting. >> So what is the difference there? What are you enabling to happen so much more speedily than happened in the legacy system? >> So, our legacy system was a single order entry application. While the new system allows them to submit multiple orders across securities, across accounts in a single, in a single, operation. So what would have taken, you know, minutes to submit say ten orders, is now just takes a few seconds. So, it's just a faster enhanced order entry experience. And I love that I was a part of that, that journey, yup. >> So, so speed is one thing. What are some other priorities that you have going forward in terms of enhancing the products that you provide to financial advisors? >> Just be able to efficiently, you know, submit orders as well. So with respect to, you know, just submitting multiple orders going across securities. Or even like quickly creating tickets. With the legacy system it was a lot of like form filling. You start, you entered the account, you entered the security and you fill out all the other details. But we've enabled them with quick ways to create tickets. So, in just a few keystrokes, with, like, semantic based entries, they can create like, multiple tickets and submit the orders. So, just being able to efficiently do their job as well was one of the key things that we were looking to deliver. >> And are you focused at all on the user, the sort of the design user experience element too? >> So we do have a dedicated user experience team. But since I started off as a front end developer, I did work very closely with them, to help, like build out that interface. So, yeah, we do have a dedicated team. It was great to actually work with them to help build that out, yup. >> Great. And finally, I just am curious about your thoughts about this Grace Hopper Conference. This is, is this your first time? >> It's my first time at Grace Hopper. >> A newbie here. >> It's been overwhelming. I remember walking in yesterday and I could see a sea of people and it's been wonderful, yeah. >> Great, great. So we'll see you here next year? >> Absolutely. >> Excellent. Well Anjali thank you so much, it's been a pleasure talking to you, having you on the show. >> Thank you. >> I'm Rebecca Knight. We'll have more from the Grace Hopper Conference in just a little bit. (techno music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by Silicon Angle Media. Thanks so much for coming on the show. So I'd love to just tell our viewers And I remember starting out as, you know, So you as a woman in technology So, you know, that's just the culture at Morgan Stanley. And you are here, obviously, trying to I'm interested in both what Morgan Stanley job to fit into their lives. And what's really wonderful is that, you know, So Morgan Stanley could be a choice employee, And you can tell they're very, very intelligent. you know, figuring out the solution. So, that's, that's been a new experience, so, yeah. And it's just really exciting to see So what would have taken, you know, minutes enhancing the products that you So with respect to, you know, So we do have a dedicated user experience team. And finally, I just am curious about it's been wonderful, yeah. So we'll see you here next year? Well Anjali thank you so much, it's been We'll have more from the Grace Hopper Conference
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Anjali Menon | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Anjali | PERSON | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Morgan Stanley | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2011 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Silicon Angle Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
yesterday | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
next year | DATE | 0.99+ |
two clicks | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
NYU | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two problems | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
nine | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Grace Hopper | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
ten orders | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Grace Hopper Conference | EVENT | 0.96+ |
single | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
single order | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Grace Hopper | EVENT | 0.92+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.91+ |
seven years old | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
three | DATE | 0.9+ |
once a day | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
Cube | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
summer of 2016 | DATE | 0.87+ |
four years ago | DATE | 0.85+ |
five job | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
Morgan Stanley | PERSON | 0.82+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.73+ |
Grace Hopper | TITLE | 0.67+ |
years | DATE | 0.65+ |
last couple | DATE | 0.64+ |
of Women in Computing | TITLE | 0.56+ |
key | QUANTITY | 0.48+ |
Morgan Berman, MilkCrate | Grace Hopper2017
>> Announcer: Live from Orlando, Florida, it's theCUBE covering Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing. Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. >> Welcome back to theCUBE's coverage of the Grace Hopper Conference in Orlando, Florida. I'm your host, Rebecca Knight. We're joined by Morgan Berman. She is the founder and CEO of MilkCrate, a platform that measures and grows social and environmental impact. Thanks so much for joining us. >> Thanks for having me. >> So I want to, start off by telling us a little bit about MilkCrate. >> Sure. So we're a tech company. We got our start about four years ago. We've grown and changed a lot in that time, but what we really focus on doing is helping big organizations either for- or non-profit, engage people in social and environmental impact in a game app. And we build custom versions of this app based on the goals of each client. So whether it's a big company that wants to engage employees in volunteering and riding a bike to work, or a nonprofit that has kids that they're trying to get to go to art museums, and encourage them to go more often, we can gamify both of those behaviors in unique apps and then those clients have their own engagement experience for hitting those goals. >> Well, that's a really neat idea. Tell me how you came up with it. >> Well, like I said, it's changed and grown over time. Originally it was my own personal desire to grow my impact in the world. I grew up in this kind of crunchy, kind of wonderful bubble, I guess, where my mom would only buy food from the farmer's market, she was actually a farm-to-table chef, one of the first female chefs in Philly. She wrote books rating and reviewing thrift shopping, so I grew up with like fresh local food, thrift shopping, there was a community garden behind us. >> She was a hipster before her time. >> Exactly, my mom's like the original hipster. And my dad was also an entrepreneur. So when I moved to West Philadelphia, which is like the crunchiest part of the city by far, I was trying to figure out how to ride a bike in the city for the first time, and how do you compost with worms when you live in an apartment and you don't have a backyard. Where's my nearest food co-op so I can start feeding myself this way? And my interest grew and grew as I started learning about things like climate change. And I went to a Bill McKibben talk about fossil fuel divestment, and there were these children in Haiti holding a sign that said Connect The Dots Your Actions Affect Me. And it really hit home how my privilege as this western world person with this degree and all of these things that most people don't have that every choice I made about my life was having a direct impact on someone on the other side of the world, or often not even that far from me. And so I wanted to figure out how to live my life in a way that my values weren't conflicting with my actions. So I applied for graduate school in sustainable design to originally, the idea was to help design sustainable buildings but I quickly learned that even though I had this degree, architects weren't going to take me seriously. And so I pivoted and took all my extra-curriculars in Industrial Design and Interactive Media. And I had the head of the department for Interactive Media actually helping me with the first mock-ups of MilkCrate, which was all about designing an app to help people live their values, particularly around sustainability. And then, after a few years of learning and growing, we actually, Forbes picked us to be one of the five companies on the Forbes Under 30 stage and that catapulted us onto this path of suddenly going from a school project to a startup company that needed to raise money and have a business model. And I was like, what's a business model? So after about two years of learning and growing, we realized that there's this opportunity with big corporations to engage employees in sustainability and that there was a pain point on this enterprise level that we could solve, and yeah. >> And what was this pain point? I mean, I think that's the thing is we can all say it's great for companies to get their employees to ride more bikes and to start a recycling program-- >> But why do they care? >> Yeah! >> And that's what investors would always ask, and I'd be like, ugh! And I had to learn the answer! And the answer is 75% of the S&P 500 issues a CSR Sustainability Report every year, and that has grown exponentially over the last few years. And the reason they do that is because employees want to work for a company that's making a difference. 45% of millennials would take a 15% cut or more in their salary to work for a company that makes a difference in the world. The reason that B Corps are growing exponentially around the world, all of these things, of business is a force for good in the world, it's the norm now. Whether you realize it or not, that's what's driving people to work for a company, to stay for a company, for customers to buy a product from a company. That's how people are starting to make their important life choices. And so now companies invest in having a Corporate Social Responsibility, not only a director, but a whole department. And they're, what we learned when we were researching how to figure out this whole business model was that CSR directors, their top three pain points are engaging employees, tracking and analytics, and having a scalable, cost-effective program across the whole company. So we realized our product could do all three of those things, and I was like, oh, I think that's a business model, when you solve the major pain points for an important corporate role in the world. So that's how we started moving in that direction and we started getting validation, and then we realized we also could work with nonprofits when they started reaching out. And so now we're kind of filling both of those needs that are a little bit different. >> So you're gamifying, making it into a game, making it fun for employees, or clients or customers or whoever the target audience is. So what kind of rewards are they getting for this? How do you light up their bulbs? >> I'm actually giving a lecture on this at Warden on Monday, so it's top of mind. You've got intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, right? There are the things that you do because they make you feel like you're being your authentic self, where you're expressing your values and that lights up your brain in a way that nothing else ever will. Then you have your external, extrinsic motivations, things like prizes, but also social acknowledgement. Seeing that you are functioning the way your peers are, that sense of I am not alone, or I am normal, that's a really important validation as a human. So seeing that you're in the top 10 or that you're above average, that feels good. So we have things like your rank and how you're doing on your team and how your team's doing in comparison to other teams in your MilkCrate community. And then there's the actual rewards. So university clients of ours have given tickets to sporting events, or credit to the bookstore. Corporate clients, gift certificates to local, sustainable restaurants and coffee shops near the headquarters. We're actually now partnering with an amazing B Corp company, United By Blue, that has ethically made and environmentally thoughtful products like mugs and candles and things like that. So, it depends on the client what their goals are, what their budget is, what motivates those people. But it really, the beginning part, when you first download the app, the first couple of challenges are things like answer this question about how important is to you to live your values? So you get them thinking in that mindset about why they're using this app. >> Priming them to-- >> Priming them, exactly! Getting them in that headspace. That's the most important thing you can do in the beginning is just to help them understand why they're using this, and then the rewards are almost, they're a distant second. >> Okay, okay. So you've also, you are a B Corp, and are there many other B Corps here at Grace Hopper? I mean, what's your experience there? As you said, it is now the norm that the business is functioning this way. But B Corps are still a minority, relatively speaking. >> Right, there's a lot of room for growth there, yeah. I think having the CSR report is the norm, but doing everything you possibly can, there's still a lot of room in that department. One thing I saw that I loved was that instead of giving out swag, Facebook was actually donating money to nonprofits that help women code. I was like, that's great! So I haven't seen any B Corps here that I've, yeah, I don't think I've seen other than ROAR For Good-- >> Which we had on the show earlier. >> Yes, so Yasmine and I are definitely two Philly B Corps. I would love to see more tech companies go in that direction but yeah, there's a lot more growth that needs to happen. There are about, I think, I actually just got to meet one of the other founders of B Lab that does B Corp certification. He gave a great presentation answering in more detail why do companies do this? It was amazing how many stats he had. It was like yes! But 2,300 for B Corps and I think something like 16,000 benefit corporations. So they're slightly different things, but it's a growing movement for sure. >> So talk a little bit about your experience at this Grace Hopper Conference. It's day one, we're near the end of day one. How would you describe the energy, the atmosphere, what's your feeling about being here in Orlando? >> So I've heard over and over again people saying it's just so good to be in a room full of women who are all doing awesome things. And it keeps reminding me of when I went and saw Wonder Woman with my parents. And I remember sitting in the theater and going like this and being like oh, my cheeks are wet. Oh, I think I'm crying. Oh, I think I'm having feelings. I think it's because I've literally never seen on a screen several dozen, or hundreds of women just being powerful, physical beings with like, aggression and skill, and it having nothing to do with sexuality or being attractive. And it was just the first time I'd seen that in my 32 years of existence. And to just, there's something so powerful about having that icon, that image reflected back at you to see, oh, if you can do that, I can do that. And actually, over the last 13 months, I've been training in Brazilian jujitsu and competing, and to see women being physical, strong warriors, and only women, and it not being sexualized, it was like oh, that's the feeling I get when I compete, and when I'm with my teammates, my female teammates. Anyways, I think that's kind of what's happening here is that sense of like, these are my people, and we are doing amazing things, and to just see each other when historically, you never got to see a room like this. I think it's an unfortunately necessary experience to be reminded that we are out there, we are doing this, and it's growing. >> And there is a sisterhood and the belonging that we talked about earlier, too. >> I mean, you see men who don't seem particularly uncomfortable here. They can kind of, they're like okay with this. And they get to kind of know what it's like to be in the minority. And I kind of want to ask them, how are you feeling? What's this like for you? But like, to see everyone flipping the ratio and we're all good, so that means if we could get somewhere more like parity I think that could be pretty magical. >> So as a female founder, a female technologist, what is your advice for the younger versions of you who maybe are just graduating from college, or maybe even younger than that and sort of wondering, can I even do that? Can I aspire to be that? >> You absolutely can. And I gave some advice at the end of my session earlier. And my two bits of advice were detach yourself from any negative association with the word Failure. Try and come up with a new word for yourself if you need to because learning and growing is what you're going to do your whole life, and so taking risks, that's what you need to be doing every single day. And so pushing against those things that scare you. And the second thing was to find a mentor, because no one piece of advice I can give is ever going to fill the role that having a mentor can give you over the course of a career, or even just for a few years. The amount that I've grown in just the last four years of building my company with some of my mentors, it's incredible. So, find someone who reminds you of who you want to be, and then latch on to them and get them to help kind of carry you along. >> Great. Well, Morgan, it's been so fun talking to you. >> Thank you, this has been great. >> Thanks for joining us. >> I'm Rebecca Knight, we'll have more from the Grace Hopper Conference in Orlando just after this. (rippling music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by SiliconANGLE Media. of the Grace Hopper Conference in Orlando, Florida. So I want to, start off by telling us And we build custom versions of this app Tell me how you came up with it. to grow my impact in the world. And I had the head of the department for Interactive Media And I had to learn the answer! So what kind of rewards are they getting for this? about how important is to you to live your values? That's the most important thing you can do in the beginning that the business is functioning this way. So I haven't seen any B Corps here that I've, There are about, I think, I actually just got to meet How would you describe the energy, the atmosphere, And I remember sitting in the theater and going like this that we talked about earlier, too. And I kind of want to ask them, how are you feeling? And I gave some advice at the end of my session earlier. Well, Morgan, it's been so fun talking to you. from the Grace Hopper Conference
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Rebecca Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Philly | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
B Corp | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
15% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2,300 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Orlando | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
United By Blue | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
B Corps | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
B Lab | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Yasmine | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Haiti | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Wonder Woman | TITLE | 0.99+ |
Monday | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Orlando, Florida | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
45% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Morgan Berman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two bits | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
West Philadelphia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
32 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Bill McKibben | PERSON | 0.99+ |
MilkCrate | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Forbes | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
SiliconANGLE Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five companies | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Grace Hopper Conference | EVENT | 0.98+ |
ROAR For Good | TITLE | 0.97+ |
first couple | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
about two years | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
second thing | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Brazilian | OTHER | 0.95+ |
Philly B Corps | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
Warden | ORGANIZATION | 0.91+ |
Grace Hopper | ORGANIZATION | 0.9+ |
each client | QUANTITY | 0.88+ |
about four years ago | DATE | 0.85+ |
Grace Hopper Celebration of Women in Computing | EVENT | 0.84+ |
16,000 benefit corporations | QUANTITY | 0.82+ |
three pain points | QUANTITY | 0.81+ |
top 10 | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
first female chefs | QUANTITY | 0.8+ |
CSR Sustainability Report | TITLE | 0.79+ |
One thing | QUANTITY | 0.78+ |
challenges | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
several dozen | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
500 | TITLE | 0.76+ |
Forbes | TITLE | 0.75+ |
last four years | DATE | 0.74+ |
first mock-ups | QUANTITY | 0.74+ |
last | DATE | 0.74+ |
Connect The Dots | TITLE | 0.73+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.73+ |
last 13 months | DATE | 0.7+ |
years | DATE | 0.69+ |
P | ORGANIZATION | 0.65+ |
single day | QUANTITY | 0.65+ |
years | QUANTITY | 0.63+ |
Media | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
women | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
one piece | QUANTITY | 0.62+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.59+ |
jujitsu | TITLE | 0.55+ |
30 | TITLE | 0.43+ |
Under | QUANTITY | 0.37+ |
Grace | ORGANIZATION | 0.37+ |
Matthew Morgan & Jaspreet Singh, Druva | VMworld 2017
>> Announcer: Live from Las Vegas. It's theCUBE. Covering the VMworld 2017. Brought to you by VMware and its Ecosystem Partners. (upbeat music) >> Hey, welcome back, everyone. We're live in Las Vegas. theCUBE special coverage of VMworld 2017, our eighth year. I'm John Furrier, co-host of theCUBE with my co-host, Dave Vellante is also co-host. Our next two guests is Jaspreet Singh, CEO, Founder of Druva and Matt Morgan and CMO of Druva. Guys, welcome to theCUBE. >> Thank you very much. >> Glad to be here. >> So Pat Gelsinger basically laid it out on the keynote, essentially the waves, and one of them, you're riding hard, you're a startup. Take a minute to talk about why you guys are excited about this wave, because I think data protection, decentralized, fully cloud world. Cloud, IoT, and edge. It's creating a huge data environment. Jaspreet, take a minute to explain what you guys are doing. >> Absolutely, so if you look at the big wave, right? The data, as said, is getting completely decentralized. We have IoT, edge... the new cloud, and the data center is getting disrupted with time. And the more data gets decentralized or defragmented, the more centralized the data management has to be. Whether on the edge, in the cloud, and the whole notion of cloud, if you think about it is actually an interesting phenomenon where Amazon is applying retail economy to traditional IT. If you combine them together, you sort of want to manage the data as a service wherever it goes. Be it the edge, be it the core. You want the simplest ability to sort of protect it, to govern it, and to add intelligence to it over time as it gathers more and more information. So Druva provides a platform, end to end, to sort of make data all managed properly from a single console. >> Pat Gelsinger was up on the stage in his keynote, Andy Jassy came out. Big news, Amazon relationships. Got some fruit bearing already. And they had to do that because vCloud Air was kind of an interesting point. But he brings up the point about the cloud as disruption and that the conventional wisdom of the old is no longer the most relevant thing right now and a lot of customers are paying attention to that so I got to ask you as a founder and CEO on the right wave, in our opinion, and Wikibon's opinion. What should customers look for for success, 'cause we're early on this new vector. What's different? What should they be thinking about as they look at the cloud, look at the distributed and decentralized edge. What are the some of the things that's different? >> I think you would think about customers and, Matt, please, add to it. For customers, this is not just a technology stack, right? It's not a software-defined data center all over again. This is more of a... trying to see how they can consume something at a predictable and certain price wherever they go, right? That's the whole genesis of cloud, it's a complete business model shift. And so when they look at data and how they holistically manage data they understand data is likely to outlive most systems by 3X. And now when they have this notion of cloud, how can they be on the journey to sort of to consume and deliver the value of data as a service in this whole notion of public cloud. And that's sort of the delivered promise. >> So Matt, I wonder if you could talk about the brand continuum, that brand promise. The ascendancy of the sort of modern backup software in the first part of this millennium was coincident with virtualization and consolidating servers and that we sort of played that out. And now customers are saying we have to rethink the way we protect data because of cloud. So I wonder if you could address that and talk about the brand promise of Druva in that context. >> Excellent. Yes. We did a survey, 450 VMware customers and it basically underscores the VMware strategy. There are going to be three tenets to the modern data architecture moving forward. There's going to be physical servers, there's going to be virtualized infrastructure, and there's going to be VMware Cloud on AWS, or its derivatives. When you move further from left to right, moving from physical to virtual, virtual to cloud. What ends up happening is the approach to data protection of the past fails to scale and frankly is no longer compatible. You can't float an appliance in a cloud. You can't possibly put in your own co-located infrastructure within a cloud store to attempt to protect that data. So a lot of people just go without protection at all. What we found in our survey is that three out of four people surveyed really want an as-a-service solution because they're able to basically protect cloud to cloud. They're able to come in and say, "OK, if my data is going to be sitting there, my infrastructure is going to be sitting there, I want to be able to wrap that infrastructure with an as-a-service solution that will protect it. The real value though isn't just protecting in the cloud, it's the as-a-service solution is not limited by the constraints of the past. It can actually be extended backwards so you could take your virtual infrastructure and protect it with an as-aservice solution. You can take your physical infrastructure and protect it as a solution. So as a result, we see this as a sea change to this new way of protecting data. >> So Jaspreet, you were saying that you've got to have this centralized data management philosophy in order to succeed in this world that Matthew just described. Why is that? Is that because you need a single point of control in case something goes wrong and it's a recovery thing? Or is it more of a business model sort of an as-a-service business model requirement? I wonder if you could address that? >> So the traditional IT boundary is sort of shattering in the cloud world, right? If you're going to have... There's a last incident of sorts, right? If one incident happens in a company then many parties are looking at what happened there. Is it a breach, is it a loss, it is a governance issue? So data has multiple faces now. Data also touches multiple parties, be it production, be it the DevOps. You've got to have a holistic view of looking at the data versus traditional approach of I'm going to put a backup architecture, or DR architecture, or e-discovery architecture all in silos. And cloud sort of also gives an opportunity for people to not hug their hardware and say this is mine, go get yours. They can sort of break boundaries and say let's work together on this data set where I can manage the prediction part of it and someone else can pay their dues to manage the governance part of it. So decentralization, the more... I'm sorry. (coughs) The more decentralization of data is promoting a holistic view of management of data purely built from the cloud. >> Jaspreet, I wanted to ask you. You had a pretty busy week. We covered this on SiliconANGLE, and so I kind of want to ask it again since we're here at VMworld. $80 million in funding. Congratulations, big news. And the Druva Cloud Platform on AWS. Congratulations. Can you share more color to that? That's a lot of cash, 80 million. >> It's a good amount of money. It's no replacement for creativity, but it's a good fuel to have in the company. Yes, it's fortunate to have a great lead, lower capital with all of our existing investors: Sequoia and Nexus, Tenaya including EMC Ventures was a (mumbles) to be in this round. Secondary storage overall is getting disrupted. The legacy isn't material anymore given the big cloud wave, as I said. So the new wave of providers have to be in the cloud and hence, Druva. We've been building historically a very strong foundation of cloud native solution without a hardware approach. With no hardware approach, all in the cloud. In the past, we've taken a legacy architecture of a backup, DR, e-discovery into multiple products in Druva Phoenix, to take care of edge data or data center data and now we're taking a big step forward and say we're going to combine our products into a single platform. Think of it as Amazon services for data prediction. The customer logs in and can search for their workload, they want a backup VM survey, they want to search today, and then deliver what they want to the IT right from a single point of console. That's the power of Druva Cloud Platform. >> Eight years ago, we interviewed Dheeraj Pandey for the first time. It was our first time doing theCUBE 2010, and at that time, no one's ever heard of Nutanix. New-tan-nix, New-tAh-nix. A little accent from New Jersey, Massachusetts. I always get it wrong. >> I say New-tan-nix. >> Dheeraj was kind of crazy. He was viewed in Silicon Valley as kind of a wild card. No one got his model at that time. Dave, and David Florey of Wikibon, were like "This is amazing," they saw it right away. And I'm like, "This is really awesome." You guys are kind of out of that same track and invest along the same lines for secondary storage. So I've got to ask you, when you're doing your fundraising, you must've had some pretty interesting experiences. Can you share some of the, without naming names, the good, and kind of weird conversations you had around, cause you got to understand the trends to get your business. >> Absolutely. I think storage is the new F word, right? There's a lot of people who don't dislike storage for what happened in the public market recently. So you go to explain to them there's a thesis around making money on public cloud using public cloud as storage tiers, so we've had various interesting conversations there. We were lucky to have Riverwod, who got the idea, who are of the same conviction as the founder to put money behind where the market is going, but still a lot of venture capitalists don't like the venture part of it. They want a predictable story, they want easy money, and they want big valuations. But the venture in the venture, VC capital.. >> John: Wait a minute. The idea of venturing... >> Jaspreet: That's right. >> To go take a chance or a bet. >> Jaspreet: That's right. >> That's called venture capital. >> Jaspreet: Absolutely. >> Not hedge fund or, you know, money market. >> Jaspreet: Absolutely. >> You basically got some pretty weird, kind of like, "Huh" questions. What was the craziest question you got? That was so off-base. >> Crazy questions like, "Where's the box? (Interviewers laugh) "Wait a minute. Where's the storage box?" >> John: "Where do I put it?" >> We had one question where someone asked, "So what's your..." You know, not option, it was... What the word? What's your, the... >> "Engagement?" >> "Engagement on your software?" And we were like, this is your... backup software, or DR software. It's going to perform virtually dutiable. But you don't engage with the software as you would with a salesforce.com. You got to look for... one party or two parties of a strong conviction and sort of go with them. >> John: Great story. Thanks for sharing. >> You mentioned three things: protect, govern, and add intelligence. And that "add intelligence" pieces You don't usually associate that with, certainly not backup, but data protection. So in this world of digital business, we think of digital business is all about how you leverage data assets. And when you think of adding intelligence, that's not something we typically think of in a data protection company. How is Druva different in that regard and how can you help organizations leverage their data assets? >> Yeah. We see this as a customer journey, OK? Data protection is the gateway drug to leveraging an as-a-service model, right? Because it's really obvious. I can protect my data, I can restore it, I can do disaster recovery. Once you get that data into a centralized store, there's incredible things you can do. From the fact that it's centralized. Unlike previous approaches that were dozens or hundreds of silos that you never could report across, Druva gives you that centralization effect. So the first logical step to move up the customer journey is to embrace governance where you can start having a perspective. Making sure that you're legally complying with regulations. Making sure that you're governing for legal requirements within the company. But when you move pass that, you start to actually start to manage for patterns. And that's where intelligence comes in. When you start thinking of data, the associated metadata that surrounds that data, is data within itself. And if you wrap intelligence around that, you could start to get predictive around areas that could affect risk for your organization or even open up opportunity. So a good risk example is ransomware. Through intelligence, you can actually see when data that is distributed starts being encrypted early so you're able to identify and do what we call the anomaly detection. So that's kind of the journey, if you will. You go protection to governance, governance to intelligence. >> So it is kind of the holy grail, right? I mean. >> Jaspreet: Absolutely. >> Companies historically, in your business, haven't been able to achieve-- I mean, EMC tried, they bought Documentum to try to achieve that vision. And, I mean, I guess it failed, but they sold it for a boatload of money. So they're all good. Nobody's crying for EMC, but what's your perspective on this, Jaspreet? >> I think these are mostly elastic workload, highly elastic workload. You want a certain data, you want it right now, and you want it to be a short-lived search. You want AI, DPI, which requires a lot of data, but the DPI machine learning has to have a holistic amount of data for a very short amount of time, can burst compute, get the problem solved and move on. So historically, for lack of architecture, lack of abundant amount of hardware, and also the IT boundaries of not supporting each of the decision was the big limiting factor. Now, with cloud we've delivered a full tech search but to a price point that companies can afford for an investigative search. Searches weren't affordable in the past. They can do searching of parable data in an instant, and go out, right? And likewise, in machine learning. Machine learning is a lot easier proposition in cloud and the to use it pretty easier. So you apply deep learning, you understand parlance to what Matt said, you understand ransomware before most customers can see it, and then alert them, and then sort of move on, right? So, the seeking of IT boundaries and the power of current intelligence is truly helping us build this together. >> One last marketing question, if I may. Or a marketing challenge. You got a choice. You can go after the legacy stovepipe guys, which is relatively straightforward but there is an emerging set of modern data protection folks. How do you pick those two? Do you do both, and how do you differentiate from the latter in particular? >> Well, I'm really grateful that some large companies have gone forward to advocate public cloud. OK, Amazon and Microsoft with Azure, and with even Google with Google Cloud Platform. They have done a phenomenal job selling a disruption and a more effective way to do business when leveraging the public cloud. When you move to that, the data protection conversation must change. There is no option to do things they way you used to do it. It will be called the chain of pain. So from a marketing point of view, I can attach to all of the dynamics of what data protection means in this hybrid reality where some of your stuff will be in the public cloud, some of your stuff will be below the horizon on premises. I also have the opportunity to talk about the centralization of data. So unlike any appliance vendor that's on the market today or in any traditional approach, the idea of stovepiping your data limits you. It limits you both in the immediate term and it limits you over the long term. By centralizing that information together and delivering it as a service to wrap more of your infrastructure with our protection technology. You're going to be able to gain a lot of value. So I need to focus specifically on that centralization, the move to public cloud, and then there's a cost efficiencies conversation that I can add on top of all of that, which is about taking half your costs out. >> Guys, you had the launch of the Druva Cloud Platform. It's your big news here on AWS with the VMware. Since it's VMworld, which is VMware's Ecosystem show, what should they know about your cloud platform? The VMware customers. The people who are running ops and data centers, and obviously the data protection. We talked about what you just said, which is, there's no walls in the cloud. So it's a completely different dynamic. Completely disrupting data protection with cloud. Completely different ballgame, we get that. But VMware customers, what do they do? How do they engage with you guys? Why should they use you and what should they know? >> Absolutely, as Matt said, there are about 90% of customers we surveyed said that looking at AWS for hosting their VMs in that new model and this new shift towards public cloud Druva only adds a service solution they can consume from Amazon Marketplace, from VMware Cross Cloud Services platform, is what they're calling it. Our Druva, our partner channel, right? It's a no-hardware, simple as-a-service solution delivered natively on AWS to consume on-prem and cloud directly onto a >> So you're an ecosystem partner of VMware's. >> Absolutely. >> On that chart that Gelsinger is going to put up. Under data protection, you will have your logo there. In the future. >> In the near future, yes. There were a certain... Yes, absolutely, yes. In the near future, we definitely hope to see our logo... >> John: Well VMware is still owned by Dell Technologies, AKA Dell EMC, hence the top billing. >> Jaspreet: That's true. >> VM was in there. And they've had a little bit of a... >> Jaspreet: It's true. (laughs) >> Early on requirements of... >> John: You got screwed. Look, I'll say it. You should be in there. But you're certified, it's not like it's in development. It's shipping. >> The early on requirements by VM is pretty simple that you have to use native cloud technology, not the classic storage, and you have to have a clean path to talk across AWS. And we qualified very well. So we're in development right now and to be announced pretty soon. >> John: Alright, so bottom line. Can I buy it and use it today? >> Yes, you can buy it and use it today. >> I'm a VMware customer. >> Absolutely yes. >> Guys, thanks so much. Druva, a hot startup. $80 million of funding on top of a bunch of cash you had. How much did you raise total? >> 200. About $200 million. >> John: $200 million. Plenty of cash in the work chest. Check it out, data protection in the cloud, one of the areas being disrupted by this new wave that Pat Gelsinger is going to lay out here at VMworld 2017. We've got more live CUBE coverage after this short break. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
Brought to you by VMware and Matt Morgan and CMO of Druva. Jaspreet, take a minute to explain what you guys are doing. and the whole notion of cloud, if you think about it and a lot of customers are paying attention to that And that's sort of the delivered promise. and talk about the brand promise of Druva in that context. is the approach to data protection of the past So Jaspreet, you were saying that you've got to have this of looking at the data And the Druva Cloud Platform on AWS. So the new wave of providers Dheeraj Pandey for the first time. the good, and kind of weird conversations you had around, So you go to explain to them The idea of venturing... What was the craziest question you got? Crazy questions like, "Where's the box? What the word? You got to look for... Thanks for sharing. and how can you help organizations So that's kind of the journey, if you will. So it is kind of the holy grail, right? haven't been able to achieve-- and the to use it pretty easier. You can go after the legacy stovepipe guys, There is no option to do things they way you used to do it. and obviously the data protection. delivered natively on AWS to consume on-prem and cloud So you're an ecosystem On that chart that Gelsinger is going to put up. In the near future, yes. AKA Dell EMC, hence the top billing. And they've had a little bit of a... Jaspreet: It's true. John: You got screwed. and to be announced pretty soon. Can I buy it and use it today? Yes, you can buy it on top of a bunch of cash you had. Plenty of cash in the work chest.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David Florey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matthew | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Pat Gelsinger | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jaspreet Singh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
EMC Ventures | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two parties | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
$80 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dheeraj | PERSON | 0.99+ |
dozens | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sequoia | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Jaspreet | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dheeraj Pandey | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell Technologies | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Druva | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
80 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Jaspreet | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
$200 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tenaya | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
one question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
four people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
450 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell EMC | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New Jersey, Massachusetts | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
VMworld | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
eighth year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
one party | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
today | DATE | 0.98+ |
VMworld 2017 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Wikibon | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Druva | TITLE | 0.98+ |
About $200 million | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Matthew Morgan | PERSON | 0.98+ |
about 90% | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Eight years ago | DATE | 0.98+ |
two guests | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
VM | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one incident | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Matt Morgan, Druva & David Cordell, Port of NOLA | Future of Cloud Data Protection & Management
>> Welcome back, everyone, to our next segment here at SiliconANGLE hosted Druva Live event here in Palo Alto. Our next segment, hosting Matt Morgan and David Cordell for the understand the customer journey that the CMO of Druva and David Cordell customer. Matt, welcome back. Good to see you again. >> Matt: It's good to see you, John. >> So, take us through the customer journey. >> Okay, if you were to think about data protection, using legacy terms, you really think mostly about backup. And you think about the idea that if I just make a copy of the data and keep it in some storage apparatus, I've kind of protected my data. When you move to data management as a service, you turn that whole thing on its ear. First, let's talk about data protection. You can protect all of your end points. I don't care if the end points are on the land, or they're deep in the field, connected up to the Cloud through a WiFi connection, you can protect all of them. By collecting that data and protecting it, you can ensure that no matter what happens, people can get access to that information. Second, your servers. In remote offices, where there's DM ware proliferation, if you will. Often, most organizations don't even go through the hassle of trying to protect those servers, they just give up, and they go unprotected. With data management as a service, you can wrap data, Druva's solution inside those servers, and back those up directly to the Cloud. That data will coexist with the end points. And also, importantly, the move to Cloud apps. People move to Office 365, they move to Jace Waye, they move to Salesforce, they've got box folders. They think that data is protected and what they find is, over time, when data is lost, it's gone. And Druva can back that up as well, bringing all that together. So, our customer journey starts with protection. But what happens after protection is where it gets really interesting because that data's together and it's inside the Cloud, you actually can govern that data. So, now, legal teams can have access to all of that data if needed. You have the opportunity to manage it from a governance prospective. You have the opportunity to ensure that you're in compliance on that data, and with GDPR, that's becoming such a big deal. >> And that's the service piece, though, is adopting. Talk about how that is accelerating and where this connects. >> Oh, absolutely. The Yaza service is what makes the whole thing magical. If you think about how people can protect their data when all they have to think about is connecting to Druva. You can protect all of that data, right? You don't have to think about well, I need to build yet another architecture on Prim, I got to go buy yet another appliance. Oh wait, that appliance is full, I got to buy another one. Oh wait, the hard drives are over three years old. I got to refresh the, all of that goes away. Now, as a service, they just connect. I'm connected, I'm done. Three years, do I have to refresh? No, I don't have to do anything. It's all right there. And the third part, though, when you start looking at the customer journey is where it gets super, super interesting. We've been able to wrap machine learning around this data. And by having it all, this one data set and having machine learning algorithms, you can evolve customers to data intelligence. >> David, do you see Cloud as the center of your data protection strategy, or as an extension of your data protection strategy? >> Well, we see Druva as the center of our data protection and management strategy. The Cloud offers, even though there's consolidation, there's still pitfalls and a lot of management that you have to deal with. Druva is able to simplify this and give us an easy solution. >> What's the key to their success in your opinion? >> Key to success in my opinion is that, well the ease of use, the ease of implementation, the security that's route behind it, and the backing that a lot of people just don't see. In setting it up, it literally is just minutes, going from professional services, within 30 minutes you're set up and ready to roll. It's taken the pressure off of our legacy systems, you know, we have set up new environments but the legacy data is still a problem for us, and they've been able to determine what is good data and what is not. Druva's been able to help us determine, based on governance and the intelligence that's being provided. >> Great and Matt, I mean, they're using Druva as a center of their data protection strategy to Cloud, versus an extension as some people may look at it, why is this pattern relevant? Is it a pattern and what does it mean because this journey is one that a lot of people are on right now because, with the Cloud, there's no walls, there's no perimeter. It's a completely different paradigm shift and how you think about IT. From an architectural standpoint, it's not the same data protection game as it used to be. You guys have this as a service. So, what does it mean to be at the center of the data protection strategy, and is this pattern consistent with what you're saying? >> So, we've got 4000 customers on the platform now and David's story is a story I hear all the time. The idea that I can simply protect my data through a simple connection to the Cloud, and that's it, nothing else to do. I got a single pane of glass. I can access that data if something goes wrong I can pull that data down. That is a complete game change if you think about how people used to have to architect a system to be able to protect their data. Think about that, buying the equipment, wiring up the network, getting the appliance hot, getting access to the appliance. Is my, are my end points in my server? In my Cloud apps, are they able to communicate? I mean, all of these things that used to be kind of the big ah-ha, they all go away with Druva. You just simply connect to the service and off you go. Right, so the conversation that you've had about the simplicity angle is kind of the gateway drug to why you get started. But the limitations to it aren't there, right, so people start saying, "Wow if it's that easy, "I can do more than just the end points. "I can start doing my service. "I can do more than just three or four of my servers, "why don't I just do all my servers." Right? I mean, this is the conversation that I'm hearing. Maybe you can comment some more on that. >> Well, there's a lot more too it than I think, than just that but that's dead on. What we were seeing is resources. So when you talk about whether it's hardware or software resources, there's also employee resources. Getting those all lined up is very difficult. So, if we were looking at a product, in house, so if we're going to bring on Prim, it would probably take about four to six months to be able to roll it out because you have to plan. It's like you said, the architect that sits behind it. >> Like in an appliance, using an appliance or something? >> In an appliance, yeah. >> That's all that works got to be vetted, all that stuff, is that kind of the (laughs) that's a problem. >> We're also facing federal regulations. We have Homeland Security and the Coast Guard, comes down to us and say, "Okay, these are the regulations "that you're going to follow, "and we'll do these applications "and do these appliances meet those standards?" In some cases, no. In other cases, kind of sort of. Well, we found with Druva, that if you look at HIPAA sought to FedRAMP Ready. These are things that are really important to us, especially our SESO team. Yeah the go Clouds key. I got to ask about the security, you mentioned Coast Guard. First thing goes off in my head is, you know, they would want security because you've got a lot of stuff going in and out of the port in New Orleans, you know. I want to make sure that there's no hacking going on. What's the security angle look like on this? >> So, there is... So, the security is really good. They, we do face a lot of attacks and stuff. It comes in from all angles. Like I said, with a lot of the back end, it's at the, what is it, the sublayer. That to me is really important. So, you have your normal encryption, which everyone'll tell you, alright we're going to do from point A to point B are encrypted. Now when I start asking questions about back end encryption most companies can not answer. Or we need to find another engineer. Well, we're not sure, we'll get back to you. So, Druva is able get on the phone and start asking the questions, alright how do your sub systems communicate? How is the encryptions done on it? What type of encryption is done on it? >> Dave: They had tech jobs, they had security jobs. >> Yeah. >> So, people have a black hole, "Oh, I'll get back to you." Which means they don't have much. >> Exactly and so with Druva it was, you know, there were several conversations but they were usually real short and 10 minute conversations. Alright, you know, can you answer this for me? So, as they come up, it was easy to reach back out to Druva, and say, "Okay, what about this?" And, I mean, they got an answer back. They didn't have to wait for anyone else, they didn't have to wait for a call back, so it was really convenient for me and my SESO team. >> Matt, what's the impact to the market place 'cause, I mean, basically a lot of the stuff that is emerging, ransomware, is a huge issue. You've got obviously security, from the participants moving in and out of the Cloud, whether they're customers and/or attackers. It's got to work so you have to deal with a lot of the stuff, how do you guys make that work? And then you got to have the comfort to the customer, saying operationally you're going to be solid. >> Well, I think that the Cloud providers have done us a wonderful service, right, they have been out evangelizing the move to the Cloud. Druva doesn't have to have that conversation anymore. It's now part of the life blood of any IT organization. The Cloud is reality so now we're able to come in and say, "How can you maximize that investment." Right? So, take ransomware for a moment. I'm really glad you brought that up. This year, there were two massive ransomware attacks. We've seen 600% increase in ransomware attacks overall this year, and we did an incredible survey that showed an enormous amount of penetration within the Fortune 500. People were losing their data. In this last attack, what was really scary, you didn't have the option to pay the bitcoin. Or if you did pay the bitcoin, they didn't bother to send you the key to get your data back so it was more like a whiteware attack, not a ransomware attack. >> I think ransomware attacks are underestimated, people don't understand how severe this is. Because not only are you down, and you are hijacked, if you will, for the ransom, for the security. Look at the impact of the business. I mean, HBO is a real public example recently. I mean, this is a real threat to the business model to these companies. It's not like a check box on security anymore. Not only you need to check the box but you got to really have a bulletproof strategy. >> Yeah, it's not a nice to have, right? It used to think that maybe ransomware would attack a dummy that would click on a link in an email. Well, reality is that everyone is going to make a mistake and no matter what parameter security you have, somebody is not, don't call them a dummy, someone's going to accidentally click on something and bam, the ransomware is in your firewall. So, with Druva, you don't have to worry about it. Your data will be protected. It's not just going to be protected, it's going to be protected in the Cloud, which is a separate area. There's no way the ransomware is going to crawl to the Cloud to encrypt that data. And with our machine learning tech, we're going to see the first encryption so we're going to alert you so you have early detection. We call it anomaly detection, giving you the opportunity to make sure you can recover all of that data. >> If a friend asked you, "Hey, what's the journey like "with Druva and how do you expect it to go forward? "How would you describe that journey?" >> Oh, easy. Simplicity. Moving to Druva was an easy decision. So, if someone was coming to me and asks me, you know, they wanted to find out what about Druva products. It's easy, get in touch with them. Come up with a list of questions and start drilling 'em. I was actually pretty rough in one of the meetings with Druva. (chattering) >> What did you do, did you grill them on the technical? Was it more of a, you know, I mean, what was the key drill down points for you? >> For me, it's technical. So, there's a couple of aspects, we did see a couple ransomware. It took us a while to recover. So that was during the fact but mostly when I was drilling Druva, it was all technical. Like I said, though, they we're firing back the answers as fast as I was firing the questions. So, just be prepared. The one thing that, as you touched on with the ransomware, the other nice thing about it is that you can step back through your recovery points and see, okay, this is exactly what happened. So there is the analytic piece of it and the machine learning is absolutely sweet. So a lot of times, I actually-- >> Host: For instance are critical. >> Yes, so I get the alert and so when I get things, you know, I'm a technical CTO. I'm going to go and start looking at things so it's really convenient for me to start going back and stepping through, okay, now I see it. So, besides all the alerts, and what you're telling me, I now see the exact same thing, so it's easy to act on. >> And going forward, how do you see that journey progressing? What are the things that you anticipate that you'll be dealing with as CTO, technical CTO, what are the things that are on the horizon for you that you're going to, you're looking down the barrel of? Is it more ransomware, is it more expansion, what's the strategy look like? >> Oh, we're seeing the strangest attacks forever. So, right now, there's shipping. Shipping is being attacked left and right. It's been going on for several months. We actually brought a company in that provides networking and solutions for ships themselves for the liners. So, they show us the computer system that's on the ship. So, I start asking again about security and draw blanks. So, in working with, actually the Maritime Port Security Information Sharing Organization out of the Gulf of Mexico. It's a lot of awareness. A lot of it is education, not only for in-users, but for IT. So to be able to start stepping back through the backup is top-notch. >> Huge story, I love the drill down on that. I'm sure the infrastructure and the evolution, they've got to modernize their fleets, technically speaking. >> They do and a lot of them are looking to the United States that are coming from overseas as a driver. Yeah, so, what we're seeing again is through ships. We are seeing some ransomware come across. There's, I guess, what was it, in Russia they had a rail attack. Well, recently the Port of New Orleans has acquired a public belt of New Orleans. So that will fall under our jurisdiction soon as well. So, it's like, alright, what kind of attacks are we going to be seeing from this? So, a lot of it is the swishing system but the majority, I know the Coast Guard, a recent activity that we had was all on phishing. So, a lot of it today is through phishing but we're going to start seeing more out of the IOT. We've seen a couple of good cell phone attacks. But back to the IOT, there was attacks that, they weren't organized. They weren't professionals doing the attacks. They're coming and it's going to be rough when they hit. >> It won't hurt any service here, that's the whole point of the Cloud, Matt, for this customer journey. Having that center of strategy gives you a lot of flexibility. >> Yeah, I think the idea of leveraging all the security that has now been hardened into public Cloud providers, Azure and AWS. You can inherit all of that as part of the solution. And then all the work that we have done to layer on top of that, gives you further assurances. But there's nothing like just having your data replicated entirely off-site, in the Cloud. And when we talk about replication, we actually do that several times over so you're in the situation where you have redundancy. And I think that that's of value as well. >> Good to have technical chops. Customer insurance have to be simple. That's kind of a basic concept but tried and true business model, making things simple and elegant. Congratulations. Thanks for spending the time sharing this story today. I appreciate it. Right back, more special coverage here at theCUBE. Thanks for watching.
SUMMARY :
Good to see you again. You have the opportunity to manage it And that's the service piece, though, is adopting. I got to go buy yet another appliance. and a lot of management that you have to deal with. and they've been able to determine and how you think about IT. is kind of the gateway drug to why you get started. because you have to plan. is that kind of the (laughs) that's a problem. I got to ask about the security, you mentioned Coast Guard. So, you have your normal encryption, So, people have a black hole, "Oh, I'll get back to you." they didn't have to wait for a call back, 'cause, I mean, basically a lot of the stuff they didn't bother to send you the key I mean, this is a real threat to the business model So, with Druva, you don't have to worry about it. So, if someone was coming to me and asks me, you know, is that you can step back through your recovery points and so when I get things, you know, I'm a technical CTO. So to be able to start stepping back I'm sure the infrastructure and the evolution, So, a lot of it is the swishing system that's the whole point of the Cloud, Matt, to layer on top of that, gives you further assurances. Customer insurance have to be simple.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Cordell | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Matt Morgan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Homeland Security | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
600% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Russia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
New Orleans | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
10 minute | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
United States | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
4000 customers | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Three years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
This year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Druva | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HBO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Maritime Port Security Information Sharing Organization | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
First | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
SESO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gulf of Mexico | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Druva | PERSON | 0.99+ |
GDPR | TITLE | 0.99+ |
FedRAMP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Office 365 | TITLE | 0.98+ |
NOLA | LOCATION | 0.98+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
this year | DATE | 0.98+ |
30 minutes | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Druva Live | EVENT | 0.98+ |
Druva | TITLE | 0.97+ |
Coast Guard | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
Cloud | TITLE | 0.96+ |
two massive ransomware attacks | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
first encryption | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
First thing | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.89+ |
single pane of | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
over three years old | QUANTITY | 0.86+ |
Yaza | ORGANIZATION | 0.85+ |
about four | QUANTITY | 0.84+ |
bitcoin | OTHER | 0.8+ |
Port of New Orleans | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
HIPAA | ORGANIZATION | 0.79+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.78+ |
more | QUANTITY | 0.77+ |
point | OTHER | 0.75+ |
Prim | ORGANIZATION | 0.75+ |
Jace Waye | PERSON | 0.71+ |
one thing | QUANTITY | 0.71+ |
Cloud | ORGANIZATION | 0.63+ |
SiliconANGLE | ORGANIZATION | 0.58+ |
Salesforce | ORGANIZATION | 0.54+ |
Breaking Analysis: Databricks faces critical strategic decisions…here’s why
>> From theCUBE Studios in Palo Alto and Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from theCUBE and ETR. This is Breaking Analysis with Dave Vellante. >> Spark became a top level Apache project in 2014, and then shortly thereafter, burst onto the big data scene. Spark, along with the cloud, transformed and in many ways, disrupted the big data market. Databricks optimized its tech stack for Spark and took advantage of the cloud to really cleverly deliver a managed service that has become a leading AI and data platform among data scientists and data engineers. However, emerging customer data requirements are shifting into a direction that will cause modern data platform players generally and Databricks, specifically, we think, to make some key directional decisions and perhaps even reinvent themselves. Hello and welcome to this week's wikibon theCUBE Insights, powered by ETR. In this Breaking Analysis, we're going to do a deep dive into Databricks. We'll explore its current impressive market momentum. We're going to use some ETR survey data to show that, and then we'll lay out how customer data requirements are changing and what the ideal data platform will look like in the midterm future. We'll then evaluate core elements of the Databricks portfolio against that vision, and then we'll close with some strategic decisions that we think the company faces. And to do so, we welcome in our good friend, George Gilbert, former equities analyst, market analyst, and current Principal at TechAlpha Partners. George, good to see you. Thanks for coming on. >> Good to see you, Dave. >> All right, let me set this up. We're going to start by taking a look at where Databricks sits in the market in terms of how customers perceive the company and what it's momentum looks like. And this chart that we're showing here is data from ETS, the emerging technology survey of private companies. The N is 1,421. What we did is we cut the data on three sectors, analytics, database-data warehouse, and AI/ML. The vertical axis is a measure of customer sentiment, which evaluates an IT decision maker's awareness of the firm and the likelihood of engaging and/or purchase intent. The horizontal axis shows mindshare in the dataset, and we've highlighted Databricks, which has been a consistent high performer in this survey over the last several quarters. And as we, by the way, just as aside as we previously reported, OpenAI, which burst onto the scene this past quarter, leads all names, but Databricks is still prominent. You can see that the ETR shows some open source tools for reference, but as far as firms go, Databricks is very impressively positioned. Now, let's see how they stack up to some mainstream cohorts in the data space, against some bigger companies and sometimes public companies. This chart shows net score on the vertical axis, which is a measure of spending momentum and pervasiveness in the data set is on the horizontal axis. You can see that chart insert in the upper right, that informs how the dots are plotted, and net score against shared N. And that red dotted line at 40% indicates a highly elevated net score, anything above that we think is really, really impressive. And here we're just comparing Databricks with Snowflake, Cloudera, and Oracle. And that squiggly line leading to Databricks shows their path since 2021 by quarter. And you can see it's performing extremely well, maintaining an elevated net score and net range. Now it's comparable in the vertical axis to Snowflake, and it consistently is moving to the right and gaining share. Now, why did we choose to show Cloudera and Oracle? The reason is that Cloudera got the whole big data era started and was disrupted by Spark. And of course the cloud, Spark and Databricks and Oracle in many ways, was the target of early big data players like Cloudera. Take a listen to Cloudera CEO at the time, Mike Olson. This is back in 2010, first year of theCUBE, play the clip. >> Look, back in the day, if you had a data problem, if you needed to run business analytics, you wrote the biggest check you could to Sun Microsystems, and you bought a great big, single box, central server, and any money that was left over, you handed to Oracle for a database licenses and you installed that database on that box, and that was where you went for data. That was your temple of information. >> Okay? So Mike Olson implied that monolithic model was too expensive and inflexible, and Cloudera set out to fix that. But the best laid plans, as they say, George, what do you make of the data that we just shared? >> So where Databricks has really come up out of sort of Cloudera's tailpipe was they took big data processing, made it coherent, made it a managed service so it could run in the cloud. So it relieved customers of the operational burden. Where they're really strong and where their traditional meat and potatoes or bread and butter is the predictive and prescriptive analytics that building and training and serving machine learning models. They've tried to move into traditional business intelligence, the more traditional descriptive and diagnostic analytics, but they're less mature there. So what that means is, the reason you see Databricks and Snowflake kind of side by side is there are many, many accounts that have both Snowflake for business intelligence, Databricks for AI machine learning, where Snowflake, I'm sorry, where Databricks also did really well was in core data engineering, refining the data, the old ETL process, which kind of turned into ELT, where you loaded into the analytic repository in raw form and refine it. And so people have really used both, and each is trying to get into the other. >> Yeah, absolutely. We've reported on this quite a bit. Snowflake, kind of moving into the domain of Databricks and vice versa. And the last bit of ETR evidence that we want to share in terms of the company's momentum comes from ETR's Round Tables. They're run by Erik Bradley, and now former Gartner analyst and George, your colleague back at Gartner, Daren Brabham. And what we're going to show here is some direct quotes of IT pros in those Round Tables. There's a data science head and a CIO as well. Just make a few call outs here, we won't spend too much time on it, but starting at the top, like all of us, we can't talk about Databricks without mentioning Snowflake. Those two get us excited. Second comment zeros in on the flexibility and the robustness of Databricks from a data warehouse perspective. And then the last point is, despite competition from cloud players, Databricks has reinvented itself a couple of times over the year. And George, we're going to lay out today a scenario that perhaps calls for Databricks to do that once again. >> Their big opportunity and their big challenge for every tech company, it's managing a technology transition. The transition that we're talking about is something that's been bubbling up, but it's really epical. First time in 60 years, we're moving from an application-centric view of the world to a data-centric view, because decisions are becoming more important than automating processes. So let me let you sort of develop. >> Yeah, so let's talk about that here. We going to put up some bullets on precisely that point and the changing sort of customer environment. So you got IT stacks are shifting is George just said, from application centric silos to data centric stacks where the priority is shifting from automating processes to automating decision. You know how look at RPA and there's still a lot of automation going on, but from the focus of that application centricity and the data locked into those apps, that's changing. Data has historically been on the outskirts in silos, but organizations, you think of Amazon, think Uber, Airbnb, they're putting data at the core, and logic is increasingly being embedded in the data instead of the reverse. In other words, today, the data's locked inside the app, which is why you need to extract that data is sticking it to a data warehouse. The point, George, is we're putting forth this new vision for how data is going to be used. And you've used this Uber example to underscore the future state. Please explain? >> Okay, so this is hopefully an example everyone can relate to. The idea is first, you're automating things that are happening in the real world and decisions that make those things happen autonomously without humans in the loop all the time. So to use the Uber example on your phone, you call a car, you call a driver. Automatically, the Uber app then looks at what drivers are in the vicinity, what drivers are free, matches one, calculates an ETA to you, calculates a price, calculates an ETA to your destination, and then directs the driver once they're there. The point of this is that that cannot happen in an application-centric world very easily because all these little apps, the drivers, the riders, the routes, the fares, those call on data locked up in many different apps, but they have to sit on a layer that makes it all coherent. >> But George, so if Uber's doing this, doesn't this tech already exist? Isn't there a tech platform that does this already? >> Yes, and the mission of the entire tech industry is to build services that make it possible to compose and operate similar platforms and tools, but with the skills of mainstream developers in mainstream corporations, not the rocket scientists at Uber and Amazon. >> Okay, so we're talking about horizontally scaling across the industry, and actually giving a lot more organizations access to this technology. So by way of review, let's summarize the trend that's going on today in terms of the modern data stack that is propelling the likes of Databricks and Snowflake, which we just showed you in the ETR data and is really is a tailwind form. So the trend is toward this common repository for analytic data, that could be multiple virtual data warehouses inside of Snowflake, but you're in that Snowflake environment or Lakehouses from Databricks or multiple data lakes. And we've talked about what JP Morgan Chase is doing with the data mesh and gluing data lakes together, you've got various public clouds playing in this game, and then the data is annotated to have a common meaning. In other words, there's a semantic layer that enables applications to talk to the data elements and know that they have common and coherent meaning. So George, the good news is this approach is more effective than the legacy monolithic models that Mike Olson was talking about, so what's the problem with this in your view? >> So today's data platforms added immense value 'cause they connected the data that was previously locked up in these monolithic apps or on all these different microservices, and that supported traditional BI and AI/ML use cases. But now if we want to build apps like Uber or Amazon.com, where they've got essentially an autonomously running supply chain and e-commerce app where humans only care and feed it. But the thing is figuring out what to buy, when to buy, where to deploy it, when to ship it. We needed a semantic layer on top of the data. So that, as you were saying, the data that's coming from all those apps, the different apps that's integrated, not just connected, but it means the same. And the issue is whenever you add a new layer to a stack to support new applications, there are implications for the already existing layers, like can they support the new layer and its use cases? So for instance, if you add a semantic layer that embeds app logic with the data rather than vice versa, which we been talking about and that's been the case for 60 years, then the new data layer faces challenges that the way you manage that data, the way you analyze that data, is not supported by today's tools. >> Okay, so actually Alex, bring me up that last slide if you would, I mean, you're basically saying at the bottom here, today's repositories don't really do joins at scale. The future is you're talking about hundreds or thousands or millions of data connections, and today's systems, we're talking about, I don't know, 6, 8, 10 joins and that is the fundamental problem you're saying, is a new data error coming and existing systems won't be able to handle it? >> Yeah, one way of thinking about it is that even though we call them relational databases, when we actually want to do lots of joins or when we want to analyze data from lots of different tables, we created a whole new industry for analytic databases where you sort of mung the data together into fewer tables. So you didn't have to do as many joins because the joins are difficult and slow. And when you're going to arbitrarily join thousands, hundreds of thousands or across millions of elements, you need a new type of database. We have them, they're called graph databases, but to query them, you go back to the prerelational era in terms of their usability. >> Okay, so we're going to come back to that and talk about how you get around that problem. But let's first lay out what the ideal data platform of the future we think looks like. And again, we're going to come back to use this Uber example. In this graphic that George put together, awesome. We got three layers. The application layer is where the data products reside. The example here is drivers, rides, maps, routes, ETA, et cetera. The digital version of what we were talking about in the previous slide, people, places and things. The next layer is the data layer, that breaks down the silos and connects the data elements through semantics and everything is coherent. And then the bottom layers, the legacy operational systems feed that data layer. George, explain what's different here, the graph database element, you talk about the relational query capabilities, and why can't I just throw memory at solving this problem? >> Some of the graph databases do throw memory at the problem and maybe without naming names, some of them live entirely in memory. And what you're dealing with is a prerelational in-memory database system where you navigate between elements, and the issue with that is we've had SQL for 50 years, so we don't have to navigate, we can say what we want without how to get it. That's the core of the problem. >> Okay. So if I may, I just want to drill into this a little bit. So you're talking about the expressiveness of a graph. Alex, if you'd bring that back out, the fourth bullet, expressiveness of a graph database with the relational ease of query. Can you explain what you mean by that? >> Yeah, so graphs are great because when you can describe anything with a graph, that's why they're becoming so popular. Expressive means you can represent anything easily. They're conducive to, you might say, in a world where we now want like the metaverse, like with a 3D world, and I don't mean the Facebook metaverse, I mean like the business metaverse when we want to capture data about everything, but we want it in context, we want to build a set of digital twins that represent everything going on in the world. And Uber is a tiny example of that. Uber built a graph to represent all the drivers and riders and maps and routes. But what you need out of a database isn't just a way to store stuff and update stuff. You need to be able to ask questions of it, you need to be able to query it. And if you go back to prerelational days, you had to know how to find your way to the data. It's sort of like when you give directions to someone and they didn't have a GPS system and a mapping system, you had to give them turn by turn directions. Whereas when you have a GPS and a mapping system, which is like the relational thing, you just say where you want to go, and it spits out the turn by turn directions, which let's say, the car might follow or whoever you're directing would follow. But the point is, it's much easier in a relational database to say, "I just want to get these results. You figure out how to get it." The graph database, they have not taken over the world because in some ways, it's taking a 50 year leap backwards. >> Alright, got it. Okay. Let's take a look at how the current Databricks offerings map to that ideal state that we just laid out. So to do that, we put together this chart that looks at the key elements of the Databricks portfolio, the core capability, the weakness, and the threat that may loom. Start with the Delta Lake, that's the storage layer, which is great for files and tables. It's got true separation of compute and storage, I want you to double click on that George, as independent elements, but it's weaker for the type of low latency ingest that we see coming in the future. And some of the threats highlighted here. AWS could add transactional tables to S3, Iceberg adoption is picking up and could accelerate, that could disrupt Databricks. George, add some color here please? >> Okay, so this is the sort of a classic competitive forces where you want to look at, so what are customers demanding? What's competitive pressure? What are substitutes? Even what your suppliers might be pushing. Here, Delta Lake is at its core, a set of transactional tables that sit on an object store. So think of it in a database system, this is the storage engine. So since S3 has been getting stronger for 15 years, you could see a scenario where they add transactional tables. We have an open source alternative in Iceberg, which Snowflake and others support. But at the same time, Databricks has built an ecosystem out of tools, their own and others, that read and write to Delta tables, that's what makes the Delta Lake and ecosystem. So they have a catalog, the whole machine learning tool chain talks directly to the data here. That was their great advantage because in the past with Snowflake, you had to pull all the data out of the database before the machine learning tools could work with it, that was a major shortcoming. They fixed that. But the point here is that even before we get to the semantic layer, the core foundation is under threat. >> Yep. Got it. Okay. We got a lot of ground to cover. So we're going to take a look at the Spark Execution Engine next. Think of that as the refinery that runs really efficient batch processing. That's kind of what disrupted the DOOp in a large way, but it's not Python friendly and that's an issue because the data science and the data engineering crowd are moving in that direction, and/or they're using DBT. George, we had Tristan Handy on at Supercloud, really interesting discussion that you and I did. Explain why this is an issue for Databricks? >> So once the data lake was in place, what people did was they refined their data batch, and Spark has always had streaming support and it's gotten better. The underlying storage as we've talked about is an issue. But basically they took raw data, then they refined it into tables that were like customers and products and partners. And then they refined that again into what was like gold artifacts, which might be business intelligence metrics or dashboards, which were collections of metrics. But they were running it on the Spark Execution Engine, which it's a Java-based engine or it's running on a Java-based virtual machine, which means all the data scientists and the data engineers who want to work with Python are really working in sort of oil and water. Like if you get an error in Python, you can't tell whether the problems in Python or where it's in Spark. There's just an impedance mismatch between the two. And then at the same time, the whole world is now gravitating towards DBT because it's a very nice and simple way to compose these data processing pipelines, and people are using either SQL in DBT or Python in DBT, and that kind of is a substitute for doing it all in Spark. So it's under threat even before we get to that semantic layer, it so happens that DBT itself is becoming the authoring environment for the semantic layer with business intelligent metrics. But that's again, this is the second element that's under direct substitution and competitive threat. >> Okay, let's now move down to the third element, which is the Photon. Photon is Databricks' BI Lakehouse, which has integration with the Databricks tooling, which is very rich, it's newer. And it's also not well suited for high concurrency and low latency use cases, which we think are going to increasingly become the norm over time. George, the call out threat here is customers want to connect everything to a semantic layer. Explain your thinking here and why this is a potential threat to Databricks? >> Okay, so two issues here. What you were touching on, which is the high concurrency, low latency, when people are running like thousands of dashboards and data is streaming in, that's a problem because SQL data warehouse, the query engine, something like that matures over five to 10 years. It's one of these things, the joke that Andy Jassy makes just in general, he's really talking about Azure, but there's no compression algorithm for experience. The Snowflake guy started more than five years earlier, and for a bunch of reasons, that lead is not something that Databricks can shrink. They'll always be behind. So that's why Snowflake has transactional tables now and we can get into that in another show. But the key point is, so near term, it's struggling to keep up with the use cases that are core to business intelligence, which is highly concurrent, lots of users doing interactive query. But then when you get to a semantic layer, that's when you need to be able to query data that might have thousands or tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of joins. And that's a SQL query engine, traditional SQL query engine is just not built for that. That's the core problem of traditional relational databases. >> Now this is a quick aside. We always talk about Snowflake and Databricks in sort of the same context. We're not necessarily saying that Snowflake is in a position to tackle all these problems. We'll deal with that separately. So we don't mean to imply that, but we're just sort of laying out some of the things that Snowflake or rather Databricks customers we think, need to be thinking about and having conversations with Databricks about and we hope to have them as well. We'll come back to that in terms of sort of strategic options. But finally, when come back to the table, we have Databricks' AI/ML Tool Chain, which has been an awesome capability for the data science crowd. It's comprehensive, it's a one-stop shop solution, but the kicker here is that it's optimized for supervised model building. And the concern is that foundational models like GPT could cannibalize the current Databricks tooling, but George, can't Databricks, like other software companies, integrate foundation model capabilities into its platform? >> Okay, so the sound bite answer to that is sure, IBM 3270 terminals could call out to a graphical user interface when they're running on the XT terminal, but they're not exactly good citizens in that world. The core issue is Databricks has this wonderful end-to-end tool chain for training, deploying, monitoring, running inference on supervised models. But the paradigm there is the customer builds and trains and deploys each model for each feature or application. In a world of foundation models which are pre-trained and unsupervised, the entire tool chain is different. So it's not like Databricks can junk everything they've done and start over with all their engineers. They have to keep maintaining what they've done in the old world, but they have to build something new that's optimized for the new world. It's a classic technology transition and their mentality appears to be, "Oh, we'll support the new stuff from our old stuff." Which is suboptimal, and as we'll talk about, their biggest patron and the company that put them on the map, Microsoft, really stopped working on their old stuff three years ago so that they could build a new tool chain optimized for this new world. >> Yeah, and so let's sort of close with what we think the options are and decisions that Databricks has for its future architecture. They're smart people. I mean we've had Ali Ghodsi on many times, super impressive. I think they've got to be keenly aware of the limitations, what's going on with foundation models. But at any rate, here in this chart, we lay out sort of three scenarios. One is re-architect the platform by incrementally adopting new technologies. And example might be to layer a graph query engine on top of its stack. They could license key technologies like graph database, they could get aggressive on M&A and buy-in, relational knowledge graphs, semantic technologies, vector database technologies. George, as David Floyer always says, "A lot of ways to skin a cat." We've seen companies like, even think about EMC maintained its relevance through M&A for many, many years. George, give us your thought on each of these strategic options? >> Okay, I find this question the most challenging 'cause remember, I used to be an equity research analyst. I worked for Frank Quattrone, we were one of the top tech shops in the banking industry, although this is 20 years ago. But the M&A team was the top team in the industry and everyone wanted them on their side. And I remember going to meetings with these CEOs, where Frank and the bankers would say, "You want us for your M&A work because we can do better." And they really could do better. But in software, it's not like with EMC in hardware because with hardware, it's easier to connect different boxes. With software, the whole point of a software company is to integrate and architect the components so they fit together and reinforce each other, and that makes M&A harder. You can do it, but it takes a long time to fit the pieces together. Let me give you examples. If they put a graph query engine, let's say something like TinkerPop, on top of, I don't even know if it's possible, but let's say they put it on top of Delta Lake, then you have this graph query engine talking to their storage layer, Delta Lake. But if you want to do analysis, you got to put the data in Photon, which is not really ideal for highly connected data. If you license a graph database, then most of your data is in the Delta Lake and how do you sync it with the graph database? If you do sync it, you've got data in two places, which kind of defeats the purpose of having a unified repository. I find this semantic layer option in number three actually more promising, because that's something that you can layer on top of the storage layer that you have already. You just have to figure out then how to have your query engines talk to that. What I'm trying to highlight is, it's easy as an analyst to say, "You can buy this company or license that technology." But the really hard work is making it all work together and that is where the challenge is. >> Yeah, and well look, I thank you for laying that out. We've seen it, certainly Microsoft and Oracle. I guess you might argue that well, Microsoft had a monopoly in its desktop software and was able to throw off cash for a decade plus while it's stock was going sideways. Oracle had won the database wars and had amazing margins and cash flow to be able to do that. Databricks isn't even gone public yet, but I want to close with some of the players to watch. Alex, if you'd bring that back up, number four here. AWS, we talked about some of their options with S3 and it's not just AWS, it's blob storage, object storage. Microsoft, as you sort of alluded to, was an early go-to market channel for Databricks. We didn't address that really. So maybe in the closing comments we can. Google obviously, Snowflake of course, we're going to dissect their options in future Breaking Analysis. Dbt labs, where do they fit? Bob Muglia's company, Relational.ai, why are these players to watch George, in your opinion? >> So everyone is trying to assemble and integrate the pieces that would make building data applications, data products easy. And the critical part isn't just assembling a bunch of pieces, which is traditionally what AWS did. It's a Unix ethos, which is we give you the tools, you put 'em together, 'cause you then have the maximum choice and maximum power. So what the hyperscalers are doing is they're taking their key value stores, in the case of ASW it's DynamoDB, in the case of Azure it's Cosmos DB, and each are putting a graph query engine on top of those. So they have a unified storage and graph database engine, like all the data would be collected in the key value store. Then you have a graph database, that's how they're going to be presenting a foundation for building these data apps. Dbt labs is putting a semantic layer on top of data lakes and data warehouses and as we'll talk about, I'm sure in the future, that makes it easier to swap out the underlying data platform or swap in new ones for specialized use cases. Snowflake, what they're doing, they're so strong in data management and with their transactional tables, what they're trying to do is take in the operational data that used to be in the province of many state stores like MongoDB and say, "If you manage that data with us, it'll be connected to your analytic data without having to send it through a pipeline." And that's hugely valuable. Relational.ai is the wildcard, 'cause what they're trying to do, it's almost like a holy grail where you're trying to take the expressiveness of connecting all your data in a graph but making it as easy to query as you've always had it in a SQL database or I should say, in a relational database. And if they do that, it's sort of like, it'll be as easy to program these data apps as a spreadsheet was compared to procedural languages, like BASIC or Pascal. That's the implications of Relational.ai. >> Yeah, and again, we talked before, why can't you just throw this all in memory? We're talking in that example of really getting down to differences in how you lay the data out on disk in really, new database architecture, correct? >> Yes. And that's why it's not clear that you could take a data lake or even a Snowflake and why you can't put a relational knowledge graph on those. You could potentially put a graph database, but it'll be compromised because to really do what Relational.ai has done, which is the ease of Relational on top of the power of graph, you actually need to change how you're storing your data on disk or even in memory. So you can't, in other words, it's not like, oh we can add graph support to Snowflake, 'cause if you did that, you'd have to change, or in your data lake, you'd have to change how the data is physically laid out. And then that would break all the tools that talk to that currently. >> What in your estimation, is the timeframe where this becomes critical for a Databricks and potentially Snowflake and others? I mentioned earlier midterm, are we talking three to five years here? Are we talking end of decade? What's your radar say? >> I think something surprising is going on that's going to sort of come up the tailpipe and take everyone by storm. All the hype around business intelligence metrics, which is what we used to put in our dashboards where bookings, billings, revenue, customer, those things, those were the key artifacts that used to live in definitions in your BI tools, and DBT has basically created a standard for defining those so they live in your data pipeline or they're defined in their data pipeline and executed in the data warehouse or data lake in a shared way, so that all tools can use them. This sounds like a digression, it's not. All this stuff about data mesh, data fabric, all that's going on is we need a semantic layer and the business intelligence metrics are defining common semantics for your data. And I think we're going to find by the end of this year, that metrics are how we annotate all our analytic data to start adding common semantics to it. And we're going to find this semantic layer, it's not three to five years off, it's going to be staring us in the face by the end of this year. >> Interesting. And of course SVB today was shut down. We're seeing serious tech headwinds, and oftentimes in these sort of downturns or flat turns, which feels like this could be going on for a while, we emerge with a lot of new players and a lot of new technology. George, we got to leave it there. Thank you to George Gilbert for excellent insights and input for today's episode. I want to thank Alex Myerson who's on production and manages the podcast, of course Ken Schiffman as well. Kristin Martin and Cheryl Knight help get the word out on social media and in our newsletters. And Rob Hof is our EIC over at Siliconangle.com, he does some great editing. Remember all these episodes, they're available as podcasts. Wherever you listen, all you got to do is search Breaking Analysis Podcast, we publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com, or you can email me at David.Vellante@siliconangle.com, or DM me @DVellante. Comment on our LinkedIn post, and please do check out ETR.ai, great survey data, enterprise tech focus, phenomenal. This is Dave Vellante for theCUBE Insights powered by ETR. Thanks for watching, and we'll see you next time on Breaking Analysis.
SUMMARY :
bringing you data-driven core elements of the Databricks portfolio and pervasiveness in the data and that was where you went for data. and Cloudera set out to fix that. the reason you see and the robustness of Databricks and their big challenge and the data locked into in the real world and decisions Yes, and the mission of that is propelling the likes that the way you manage that data, is the fundamental problem because the joins are difficult and slow. and connects the data and the issue with that is the fourth bullet, expressiveness and it spits out the and the threat that may loom. because in the past with Snowflake, Think of that as the refinery So once the data lake was in place, George, the call out threat here But the key point is, in sort of the same context. and the company that put One is re-architect the platform and architect the components some of the players to watch. in the case of ASW it's DynamoDB, and why you can't put a relational and executed in the data and manages the podcast, of
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
David Floyer | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike Olson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2014 | DATE | 0.99+ |
George Gilbert | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
George | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Andy Jassy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Erik Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Uber | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
thousands | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Sun Microsystems | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Bob Muglia | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Airbnb | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
60 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Ali Ghodsi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2010 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Kristin Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Rob Hof | PERSON | 0.99+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Databricks' | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two places | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Tristan Handy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
M&A | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Frank Quattrone | PERSON | 0.99+ |
second element | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Daren Brabham | PERSON | 0.99+ |
TechAlpha Partners | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third element | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cloudera | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
five years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Breaking Analysis: Grading our 2022 Enterprise Technology Predictions
>>From the Cube Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from the cube and E T R. This is breaking analysis with Dave Valante. >>Making technology predictions in 2022 was tricky business, especially if you were projecting the performance of markets or identifying I P O prospects and making binary forecast on data AI and the macro spending climate and other related topics in enterprise tech 2022, of course was characterized by a seesaw economy where central banks were restructuring their balance sheets. The war on Ukraine fueled inflation supply chains were a mess. And the unintended consequences of of forced march to digital and the acceleration still being sorted out. Hello and welcome to this week's weekly on Cube Insights powered by E T R. In this breaking analysis, we continue our annual tradition of transparently grading last year's enterprise tech predictions. And you may or may not agree with our self grading system, but look, we're gonna give you the data and you can draw your own conclusions and tell you what, tell us what you think. >>All right, let's get right to it. So our first prediction was tech spending increases by 8% in 2022. And as we exited 2021 CIOs, they were optimistic about their digital transformation plans. You know, they rushed to make changes to their business and were eager to sharpen their focus and continue to iterate on their digital business models and plug the holes that they, the, in the learnings that they had. And so we predicted that 8% rise in enterprise tech spending, which looked pretty good until Ukraine and the Fed decided that, you know, had to rush and make up for lost time. We kind of nailed the momentum in the energy sector, but we can't give ourselves too much credit for that layup. And as of October, Gartner had it spending growing at just over 5%. I think it was 5.1%. So we're gonna take a C plus on this one and, and move on. >>Our next prediction was basically kind of a slow ground ball. The second base, if I have to be honest, but we felt it was important to highlight that security would remain front and center as the number one priority for organizations in 2022. As is our tradition, you know, we try to up the degree of difficulty by specifically identifying companies that are gonna benefit from these trends. So we highlighted some possible I P O candidates, which of course didn't pan out. S NQ was on our radar. The company had just had to do another raise and they recently took a valuation hit and it was a down round. They raised 196 million. So good chunk of cash, but, but not the i p O that we had predicted Aqua Securities focus on containers and cloud native. That was a trendy call and we thought maybe an M SS P or multiple managed security service providers like Arctic Wolf would I p o, but no way that was happening in the crummy market. >>Nonetheless, we think these types of companies, they're still faring well as the talent shortage in security remains really acute, particularly in the sort of mid-size and small businesses that often don't have a sock Lacework laid off 20% of its workforce in 2022. And CO C e o Dave Hatfield left the company. So that I p o didn't, didn't happen. It was probably too early for Lacework. Anyway, meanwhile you got Netscope, which we've cited as strong in the E T R data as particularly in the emerging technology survey. And then, you know, I lumia holding its own, you know, we never liked that 7 billion price tag that Okta paid for auth zero, but we loved the TAM expansion strategy to target developers beyond sort of Okta's enterprise strength. But we gotta take some points off of the failure thus far of, of Okta to really nail the integration and the go to market model with azero and build, you know, bring that into the, the, the core Okta. >>So the focus on endpoint security that was a winner in 2022 is CrowdStrike led that charge with others holding their own, not the least of which was Palo Alto Networks as it continued to expand beyond its core network security and firewall business, you know, through acquisition. So overall we're gonna give ourselves an A minus for this relatively easy call, but again, we had some specifics associated with it to make it a little tougher. And of course we're watching ve very closely this this coming year in 2023. The vendor consolidation trend. You know, according to a recent Palo Alto network survey with 1300 SecOps pros on average organizations have more than 30 tools to manage security tools. So this is a logical way to optimize cost consolidating vendors and consolidating redundant vendors. The E T R data shows that's clearly a trend that's on the upswing. >>Now moving on, a big theme of 2020 and 2021 of course was remote work and hybrid work and new ways to work and return to work. So we predicted in 2022 that hybrid work models would become the dominant protocol, which clearly is the case. We predicted that about 33% of the workforce would come back to the office in 2022 in September. The E T R data showed that figure was at 29%, but organizations expected that 32% would be in the office, you know, pretty much full-time by year end. That hasn't quite happened, but we were pretty close with the projection, so we're gonna take an A minus on this one. Now, supply chain disruption was another big theme that we felt would carry through 2022. And sure that sounds like another easy one, but as is our tradition, again we try to put some binary metrics around our predictions to put some meat in the bone, so to speak, and and allow us than you to say, okay, did it come true or not? >>So we had some data that we presented last year and supply chain issues impacting hardware spend. We said at the time, you can see this on the left hand side of this chart, the PC laptop demand would remain above pre covid levels, which would reverse a decade of year on year declines, which I think started in around 2011, 2012. Now, while demand is down this year pretty substantially relative to 2021, I D C has worldwide unit shipments for PCs at just over 300 million for 22. If you go back to 2019 and you're looking at around let's say 260 million units shipped globally, you know, roughly, so, you know, pretty good call there. Definitely much higher than pre covid levels. But so what you might be asking why the B, well, we projected that 30% of customers would replace security appliances with cloud-based services and that more than a third would replace their internal data center server and storage hardware with cloud services like 30 and 40% respectively. >>And we don't have explicit survey data on exactly these metrics, but anecdotally we see this happening in earnest. And we do have some data that we're showing here on cloud adoption from ET R'S October survey where the midpoint of workloads running in the cloud is around 34% and forecast, as you can see, to grow steadily over the next three years. So this, well look, this is not, we understand it's not a one-to-one correlation with our prediction, but it's a pretty good bet that we were right, but we gotta take some points off, we think for the lack of unequivocal proof. Cause again, we always strive to make our predictions in ways that can be measured as accurate or not. Is it binary? Did it happen, did it not? Kind of like an O K R and you know, we strive to provide data as proof and in this case it's a bit fuzzy. >>We have to admit that although we're pretty comfortable that the prediction was accurate. And look, when you make an hard forecast, sometimes you gotta pay the price. All right, next, we said in 2022 that the big four cloud players would generate 167 billion in IS and PaaS revenue combining for 38% market growth. And our current forecasts are shown here with a comparison to our January, 2022 figures. So coming into this year now where we are today, so currently we expect 162 billion in total revenue and a 33% growth rate. Still very healthy, but not on our mark. So we think a w s is gonna miss our predictions by about a billion dollars, not, you know, not bad for an 80 billion company. So they're not gonna hit that expectation though of getting really close to a hundred billion run rate. We thought they'd exit the year, you know, closer to, you know, 25 billion a quarter and we don't think they're gonna get there. >>Look, we pretty much nailed Azure even though our prediction W was was correct about g Google Cloud platform surpassing Alibaba, Alibaba, we way overestimated the performance of both of those companies. So we're gonna give ourselves a C plus here and we think, yeah, you might think it's a little bit harsh, we could argue for a B minus to the professor, but the misses on GCP and Alibaba we think warrant a a self penalty on this one. All right, let's move on to our prediction about Supercloud. We said it becomes a thing in 2022 and we think by many accounts it has, despite the naysayers, we're seeing clear evidence that the concept of a layer of value add that sits above and across clouds is taking shape. And on this slide we showed just some of the pickup in the industry. I mean one of the most interesting is CloudFlare, the biggest supercloud antagonist. >>Charles Fitzgerald even predicted that no vendor would ever use the term in their marketing. And that would be proof if that happened that Supercloud was a thing and he said it would never happen. Well CloudFlare has, and they launched their version of Supercloud at their developer week. Chris Miller of the register put out a Supercloud block diagram, something else that Charles Fitzgerald was, it was was pushing us for, which is rightly so, it was a good call on his part. And Chris Miller actually came up with one that's pretty good at David Linthicum also has produced a a a A block diagram, kind of similar, David uses the term metacloud and he uses the term supercloud kind of interchangeably to describe that trend. And so we we're aligned on that front. Brian Gracely has covered the concept on the popular cloud podcast. Berkeley launched the Sky computing initiative. >>You read through that white paper and many of the concepts highlighted in the Supercloud 3.0 community developed definition align with that. Walmart launched a platform with many of the supercloud salient attributes. So did Goldman Sachs, so did Capital One, so did nasdaq. So you know, sorry you can hate the term, but very clearly the evidence is gathering for the super cloud storm. We're gonna take an a plus on this one. Sorry, haters. Alright, let's talk about data mesh in our 21 predictions posts. We said that in the 2020s, 75% of large organizations are gonna re-architect their big data platforms. So kind of a decade long prediction. We don't like to do that always, but sometimes it's warranted. And because it was a longer term prediction, we, at the time in, in coming into 22 when we were evaluating our 21 predictions, we took a grade of incomplete because the sort of decade long or majority of the decade better part of the decade prediction. >>So last year, earlier this year, we said our number seven prediction was data mesh gains momentum in 22. But it's largely confined and narrow data problems with limited scope as you can see here with some of the key bullets. So there's a lot of discussion in the data community about data mesh and while there are an increasing number of examples, JP Morgan Chase, Intuit, H S P C, HelloFresh, and others that are completely rearchitecting parts of their data platform completely rearchitecting entire data platforms is non-trivial. There are organizational challenges, there're data, data ownership, debates, technical considerations, and in particular two of the four fundamental data mesh principles that the, the need for a self-service infrastructure and federated computational governance are challenging. Look, democratizing data and facilitating data sharing creates conflicts with regulatory requirements around data privacy. As such many organizations are being really selective with their data mesh implementations and hence our prediction of narrowing the scope of data mesh initiatives. >>I think that was right on J P M C is a good example of this, where you got a single group within a, within a division narrowly implementing the data mesh architecture. They're using a w s, they're using data lakes, they're using Amazon Glue, creating a catalog and a variety of other techniques to meet their objectives. They kind of automating data quality and it was pretty well thought out and interesting approach and I think it's gonna be made easier by some of the announcements that Amazon made at the recent, you know, reinvent, particularly trying to eliminate ET t l, better connections between Aurora and Redshift and, and, and better data sharing the data clean room. So a lot of that is gonna help. Of course, snowflake has been on this for a while now. Many other companies are facing, you know, limitations as we said here and this slide with their Hadoop data platforms. They need to do new, some new thinking around that to scale. HelloFresh is a really good example of this. Look, the bottom line is that organizations want to get more value from data and having a centralized, highly specialized teams that own the data problem, it's been a barrier and a blocker to success. The data mesh starts with organizational considerations as described in great detail by Ash Nair of Warner Brothers. So take a listen to this clip. >>Yeah, so when people think of Warner Brothers, you always think of like the movie studio, but we're more than that, right? I mean, you think of H B O, you think of t n t, you think of C N N. We have 30 plus brands in our portfolio and each have their own needs. So the, the idea of a data mesh really helps us because what we can do is we can federate access across the company so that, you know, CNN can work at their own pace. You know, when there's election season, they can ingest their own data and they don't have to, you know, bump up against, as an example, HBO if Game of Thrones is going on. >>So it's often the case that data mesh is in the eyes of the implementer. And while a company's implementation may not strictly adhere to Jamma Dani's vision of data mesh, and that's okay, the goal is to use data more effectively. And despite Gartner's attempts to deposition data mesh in favor of the somewhat confusing or frankly far more confusing data fabric concept that they stole from NetApp data mesh is taking hold in organizations globally today. So we're gonna take a B on this one. The prediction is shaping up the way we envision, but as we previously reported, it's gonna take some time. The better part of a decade in our view, new standards have to emerge to make this vision become reality and they'll come in the form of both open and de facto approaches. Okay, our eighth prediction last year focused on the face off between Snowflake and Databricks. >>And we realized this popular topic, and maybe one that's getting a little overplayed, but these are two companies that initially, you know, looked like they were shaping up as partners and they, by the way, they are still partnering in the field. But you go back a couple years ago, the idea of using an AW w s infrastructure, Databricks machine intelligence and applying that on top of Snowflake as a facile data warehouse, still very viable. But both of these companies, they have much larger ambitions. They got big total available markets to chase and large valuations that they have to justify. So what's happening is, as we've previously reported, each of these companies is moving toward the other firm's core domain and they're building out an ecosystem that'll be critical for their future. So as part of that effort, we said each is gonna become aggressive investors and maybe start doing some m and a and they have in various companies. >>And on this chart that we produced last year, we studied some of the companies that were targets and we've added some recent investments of both Snowflake and Databricks. As you can see, they've both, for example, invested in elation snowflake's, put money into Lacework, the Secur security firm, ThoughtSpot, which is trying to democratize data with ai. Collibra is a governance platform and you can see Databricks investments in data transformation with D B T labs, Matillion doing simplified business intelligence hunters. So that's, you know, they're security investment and so forth. So other than our thought that we'd see Databricks I p o last year, this prediction been pretty spot on. So we'll give ourselves an A on that one. Now observability has been a hot topic and we've been covering it for a while with our friends at E T R, particularly Eric Bradley. Our number nine prediction last year was basically that if you're not cloud native and observability, you are gonna be in big trouble. >>So everything guys gotta go cloud native. And that's clearly been the case. Splunk, the big player in the space has been transitioning to the cloud, hasn't always been pretty, as we reported, Datadog real momentum, the elk stack, that's open source model. You got new entrants that we've cited before, like observe, honeycomb, chaos search and others that we've, we've reported on, they're all born in the cloud. So we're gonna take another a on this one, admittedly, yeah, it's a re reasonably easy call, but you gotta have a few of those in the mix. Okay, our last prediction, our number 10 was around events. Something the cube knows a little bit about. We said that a new category of events would emerge as hybrid and that for the most part is happened. So that's gonna be the mainstay is what we said. That pure play virtual events are gonna give way to hi hybrid. >>And the narrative is that virtual only events are, you know, they're good for quick hits, but lousy replacements for in-person events. And you know that said, organizations of all shapes and sizes, they learn how to create better virtual content and support remote audiences during the pandemic. So when we set at pure play is gonna give way to hybrid, we said we, we i we implied or specific or specified that the physical event that v i p experience is going defined. That overall experience and those v i p events would create a little fomo, fear of, of missing out in a virtual component would overlay that serves an audience 10 x the size of the physical. We saw that really two really good examples. Red Hat Summit in Boston, small event, couple thousand people served tens of thousands, you know, online. Second was Google Cloud next v i p event in, in New York City. >>Everything else was, was, was, was virtual. You know, even examples of our prediction of metaverse like immersion have popped up and, and and, and you know, other companies are doing roadshow as we predicted like a lot of companies are doing it. You're seeing that as a major trend where organizations are going with their sales teams out into the regions and doing a little belly to belly action as opposed to the big giant event. That's a definitely a, a trend that we're seeing. So in reviewing this prediction, the grade we gave ourselves is, you know, maybe a bit unfair, it should be, you could argue for a higher grade, but the, but the organization still haven't figured it out. They have hybrid experiences but they generally do a really poor job of leveraging the afterglow and of event of an event. It still tends to be one and done, let's move on to the next event or the next city. >>Let the sales team pick up the pieces if they were paying attention. So because of that, we're only taking a B plus on this one. Okay, so that's the review of last year's predictions. You know, overall if you average out our grade on the 10 predictions that come out to a b plus, I dunno why we can't seem to get that elusive a, but we're gonna keep trying our friends at E T R and we are starting to look at the data for 2023 from the surveys and all the work that we've done on the cube and our, our analysis and we're gonna put together our predictions. We've had literally hundreds of inbounds from PR pros pitching us. We've got this huge thick folder that we've started to review with our yellow highlighter. And our plan is to review it this month, take a look at all the data, get some ideas from the inbounds and then the e t R of January surveys in the field. >>It's probably got a little over a thousand responses right now. You know, they'll get up to, you know, 1400 or so. And once we've digested all that, we're gonna go back and publish our predictions for 2023 sometime in January. So stay tuned for that. All right, we're gonna leave it there for today. You wanna thank Alex Myerson who's on production and he manages the podcast, Ken Schiffman as well out of our, our Boston studio. I gotta really heartfelt thank you to Kristen Martin and Cheryl Knight and their team. They helped get the word out on social and in our newsletters. Rob Ho is our editor in chief over at Silicon Angle who does some great editing for us. Thank you all. Remember all these podcasts are available or all these episodes are available is podcasts. Wherever you listen, just all you do Search Breaking analysis podcast, really getting some great traction there. Appreciate you guys subscribing. I published each week on wikibon.com, silicon angle.com or you can email me directly at david dot valante silicon angle.com or dm me Dante, or you can comment on my LinkedIn post. And please check out ETR AI for the very best survey data in the enterprise tech business. Some awesome stuff in there. This is Dante for the Cube Insights powered by etr. Thanks for watching and we'll see you next time on breaking analysis.
SUMMARY :
From the Cube Studios in Palo Alto in Boston, bringing you data-driven insights from self grading system, but look, we're gonna give you the data and you can draw your own conclusions and tell you what, We kind of nailed the momentum in the energy but not the i p O that we had predicted Aqua Securities focus on And then, you know, I lumia holding its own, you So the focus on endpoint security that was a winner in 2022 is CrowdStrike led that charge put some meat in the bone, so to speak, and and allow us than you to say, okay, We said at the time, you can see this on the left hand side of this chart, the PC laptop demand would remain Kind of like an O K R and you know, we strive to provide data We thought they'd exit the year, you know, closer to, you know, 25 billion a quarter and we don't think they're we think, yeah, you might think it's a little bit harsh, we could argue for a B minus to the professor, Chris Miller of the register put out a Supercloud block diagram, something else that So you know, sorry you can hate the term, but very clearly the evidence is gathering for the super cloud But it's largely confined and narrow data problems with limited scope as you can see here with some of the announcements that Amazon made at the recent, you know, reinvent, particularly trying to the company so that, you know, CNN can work at their own pace. So it's often the case that data mesh is in the eyes of the implementer. but these are two companies that initially, you know, looked like they were shaping up as partners and they, So that's, you know, they're security investment and so forth. So that's gonna be the mainstay is what we And the narrative is that virtual only events are, you know, they're good for quick hits, the grade we gave ourselves is, you know, maybe a bit unfair, it should be, you could argue for a higher grade, You know, overall if you average out our grade on the 10 predictions that come out to a b plus, You know, they'll get up to, you know,
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Alex Myerson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Cheryl Knight | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ken Schiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Chris Miller | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CNN | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Rob Ho | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Alibaba | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dave Valante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
5.1% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Charles Fitzgerald | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Hatfield | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Brian Gracely | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Lacework | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GCP | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
33% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Walmart | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
David | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
20% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Kristen Martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Ash Nair | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Goldman Sachs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
162 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
October | DATE | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Arctic Wolf | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
two companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
38% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
September | DATE | 0.99+ |
Fed | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
JP Morgan Chase | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
80 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
29% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
32% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
21 predictions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
HBO | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Game of Thrones | TITLE | 0.99+ |
January | DATE | 0.99+ |
2023 | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 predictions | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
22 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
ThoughtSpot | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
196 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto Networks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2020s | DATE | 0.99+ |
167 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Okta | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Gartner | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Eric Bradley | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Aqua Securities | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Dante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
8% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Warner Brothers | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Intuit | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Cube Studios | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
each week | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
7 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
40% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Day 4 Keynote Analysis | AWS re:Invent 2022
(upbeat music) >> Good morning everybody. Welcome back to Las Vegas. This is day four of theCUBE's wall-to-wall coverage of our Super Bowl, aka AWS re:Invent 2022. I'm here with my co-host, Paul Gillin. My name is Dave Vellante. Sanjay Poonen is in the house, CEO and president of Cohesity. He's sitting in as our guest market watcher, market analyst, you know, deep expertise, new to the job at Cohesity. He was kind enough to sit in, and help us break down what's happening at re:Invent. But Paul, first thing, this morning we heard from Werner Vogels. He was basically given a masterclass on system design. It reminded me of mainframes years ago. When we used to, you know, bury through those IBM blue books and red books. You remember those Sanjay? That's how we- learned back then. >> Oh God, I remember those, Yeah. >> But it made me think, wow, now you know IBM's more of a systems design, nobody talks about IBM anymore. Everybody talks about Amazon. So you wonder, 20 years from now, you know what it's going to be. But >> Well- >> Werner's amazing. >> He pulled out a 24 year old document. >> Yup. >> That he had written early in Amazon's evolution about synchronous design or about essentially distributed architectures that turned out to be prophetic. >> His big thing was nature is asynchronous. So systems are asynchronous. Synchronous is an illusion. It's an abstraction. It's kind of interesting. But, you know- >> Yeah, I mean I've had synonyms for things. Timeless architecture. Werner's an absolute legend. I mean, when you think about folks who've had, you know, impact on technology, you think of people like Jony Ive in design. >> Dave: Yeah. >> You got to think about people like Werner in architecture and just the fact that Andy and the team have been able to keep him engaged that long... I pay attention to his keynote. Peter DeSantis has obviously been very, very influential. And then of course, you know, Adam did a good job, you know, watching from, you know, having watched since I was at the first AWS re:Invent conference, at time was President SAP and there was only a thousand people at this event, okay? Andy had me on stage. I think I was one of the first guest of any tech company in 2011. And to see now this become like, it's a mecca. It's a mother of all IT events, and watch sort of even the transition from Andy to Adam is very special. I got to catch some of Ruba's keynote. So while there's some new people in the mix here, this has become a force of nature. And the last time I was here was 2019, before Covid, watched the last two ones online. But it feels like, I don't know 'about what you guys think, it feels like it's back to 2019 levels. >> I was here in 2019. I feel like this was bigger than 2019 but some people have said that it's about the same. >> I think it was 60,000 versus 50,000. >> Yes. So close. >> It was a little bigger in 2019. But it feels like it's more active. >> And then last year, Sanjay, you weren't here but it was 25,000, which was amazing 'cause it was right in that little space between Omicron, before Omicron hit. But you know, let me ask you a question and this is really more of a question about Amazon's maturity and I know you've been following them since early days. But the way I get the question, number one question I get from people is how is Amazon AWS going to be different under Adam than it was under Andy? What do you think? >> I mean, Adam's not new because he was here before. In some senses he knows the Amazon culture from prior, when he was running sales and marketing prior. But then he took the time off and came back. I mean, this will always be, I think, somewhat Andy's baby, right? Because he was the... I, you know, sent him a text, "You should be really proud of what you accomplished", but you know, I think he also, I asked him when I saw him a few weeks ago "Are you going to come to re:Invent?" And he says, "No, I want to leave this to be Adam's show." And Adam's going to have a slightly different view. His keynotes are probably half the time. It's a little bit more vision. There was a lot more customer stories at the beginning of it. Taking you back to the inspirational pieces of it. I think you're going to see them probably pulling up the stack and not just focused in infrastructure. Many of their platform services are evolved. Many of their, even application services. I'm surprised when I talk to customers. Like Amazon Connect, their sort of call center type technologies, an app layer. It's getting a lot. I mean, I've talked to a couple of Fortune 500 companies that are moving off Ayer to Connect. I mean, it's happening and I did not know that. So it's, you know, I think as they move up the stack, the platform's gotten more... The data centric stack has gotten, and you know, in the area we're working with Cohesity, security, data protection, they're an investor in our company. So this is an important, you know, both... I think tech player and a partner for many companies like us. >> I wonder the, you know, the marketplace... there's been a big push on the marketplace by all the cloud companies last couple of years. Do you see that disrupting the way softwares, enterprise software is sold? >> Oh, for sure. I mean, you have to be a ostrich with your head in the sand to not see this wave happening. I mean, what's it? $150 billion worth of revenue. Even though the growth rates dipped a little bit the last quarter or so, it's still aggregatively between Amazon and Azure and Google, you know, 30% growth. And I think we're still in the second or third inning off a grand 1 trillion or 2 trillion of IT, shifting not all of it to the cloud, but significantly faster. So if you add up all of the big things of the on-premise world, they're, you know, they got to a certain size, their growth is stable, but stalling. These guys are growing significantly faster. And then if you add on top of them, platform companies the data companies, Snowflake, MongoDB, Databricks, you know, Datadog, and then apps companies on top of that. I think the move to the Cloud is inevitable. In SaaS companies, I don't know why you would ever implement a CRM solution on-prem. It's all gone to the Cloud. >> Oh, it is. >> That happened 15 years ago. I mean, begin within three, five years of the advent of Salesforce. And the same thing in HR. Why would you deploy a HR solution now? You've got Workday, you've got, you know, others that are so some of those apps markets are are just never coming back to an on-prem capability. >> Sanjay, I want to ask you, you built a reputation for being able to, you know, forecast accurately, hit your plan, you know, you hit your numbers, you're awesome operator. Even though you have a, you know, technology degree, which you know, that's a two-tool star, multi-tool star. But I call it the slingshot economy. This is like, I mean I've seen probably more downturns than anybody in here, you know, given... Well maybe, maybe- >> Maybe me. >> You and I both. I've never seen anything like this, where where visibility is so unpredictable. The economy is sling-shotting. It's like, oh, hurry up, go Covid, go, go go build, build, build supply, then pull back. And now going forward, now pulling back. Slootman said, you know, on the call, "Hey the guide, is the guide." He said, "we put it out there, We do our best to hit it." But you had CrowdStrike had issues you know, mid-market, ServiceNow. I saw McDermott on the other day on the, on the TV. I just want to pay, you know, buy from the guy. He's so (indistinct) >> But mixed, mixed results, Salesforce, you know, Octa now pre-announcing, hey, they're going to be, or announcing, you know, better visibility, forward guide. Elastic kind of got hit really hard. HPE and Dell actually doing really well in the enterprise. >> Yep. >> 'Course Dell getting killed in the client. But so what are you seeing out there? How, as an executive, do you deal with such poor visibility? >> I think, listen, what the last two or three years have taught us is, you know, with the supply chain crisis, with the surge that people thought you may need of, you know, spending potentially in the pandemic, you have to start off with your tech platform being 10 x better than everybody else. And differentiate, differentiate. 'Cause in a crowded market, but even in a market that's getting tougher, if you're not differentiating constantly through technology innovation, you're going to get left behind. So you named a few places, they're all technology innovators, but even if some of them are having challenges, and then I think you're constantly asking yourselves, how do you move from being a point product to a platform with more and more services where you're getting, you know, many of them moving really fast. In the case of Roe, I like him a lot. He's probably one of the most savvy operators, also that I respect. He calls these speedboats, and you know, his core platform started off with the firewall network security. But he's built now a very credible cloud security, cloud AI security business. And I think that's how you need to be thinking as a tech executive. I mean, if you got core, your core beachhead 10 x better than everybody else. And as you move to adjacencies in these new platforms, have you got now speedboats that are getting to a point where they are competitive advantage? Then as you think of the go-to-market perspective, it really depends on where you are as a company. For a company like our size, we need partners a lot more. Because if we're going to, you know, stand on the shoulders of giants like Isaac Newton said, "I see clearly because I stand on the shoulders giants." I need to really go and cultivate Amazon so they become our lead partner in cloud. And then appropriately Microsoft and Google where I need to. And security. Part of what we announced last week was, last month, yeah, last couple of weeks ago, was the data security alliance with the biggest security players. What was I trying to do with that? First time ever done in my industry was get Palo Alto, CrowdStrike, Wallace, Tenable, CyberArk, Splunk, all to build an alliance with me so I could stand on their shoulders with them helping me. If you're a bigger company, you're constantly asking yourself "how do you make sure you're getting your, like Amazon, their top hundred customers spending more with that?" So I think the the playbook evolves, and I'm watching some of these best companies through this time navigate through this. And I think leadership is going to be tested in enormously interesting ways. >> I'll say. I mean, Snowflake is really interesting because they... 67% growth, which is, I mean, that's best in class for a company that's $2 billion. And, but their guide was still, you know, pretty aggressive. You know, so it's like, do you, you know, when it when it's good times you go, "hey, we can we can guide conservatively and know we can beat it." But when you're not certain, you can't dial down too far 'cause your investors start to bail on you. It's a really tricky- >> But Dave, I think listen, at the end of the day, I mean every CEO should not be worried about the short term up and down in the stock price. You're building a long-term multi-billion dollar company. In the case of Frank, he has, I think I shot to a $10 billion, you know, analytics data warehousing data management company on the back of that platform, because he's eyeing the market that, not just Teradata occupies today, but now Oracle occupies or other databases, right? So his tam as it grows bigger, you're going to have some of these things, but that market's big. I think same with Palo Alto. I mean Datadog's another company, 75% growth. >> Yeah. >> At 20% margins, like almost rule of 95. >> Amazing. >> When they're going after, not just the observability market, they're eating up the sim market, security analytics, the APM market. So I think, you know, that's, you look at these case studies of companies who are going from point product to platforms and are steadily able to grow into new tams. You know, to me that's very inspiring. >> I get it. >> Sanjay: That's what I seek to do at our com. >> I get that it's a marathon, but you know, when you're at VMware, weren't you looking at the stock price every day just out of curiosity? I mean listen, you weren't micromanaging it. >> You do, but at the end of the day, and you certainly look at the days of earnings and so on so forth. >> Yeah. >> Because you want to create shareholder value. >> Yeah. >> I'm not saying that you should not but I think in obsession with that, you know, in a short term, >> Going to kill ya. >> Makes you, you know, sort of myopically focused on what may not be the right thing in the long term. Now in the long arc of time, if you're not creating shareholder value... Look at what happened to Steve Bomber. You needed Satya to come in to change things and he's created a lot of value. >> Dave: Yeah, big time. >> But I think in the short term, my comments were really on the quarter to quarter, but over a four a 12 quarter, if companies are growing and creating profitable growth, they're going to get the valuation they deserve. >> Dave: Yeah. >> Do you the... I want to ask you about something Arvind Krishna said in the previous IBM earnings call, that IT is deflationary and therefore it is resistant to the macroeconomic headwinds. So IT spending should actually thrive in a deflation, in a adverse economic climate. Do you think that's true? >> Not all forms of IT. I pay very close attention to surveys from, whether it's the industry analysts or the Morgan Stanleys, or Goldman Sachs. The financial analysts. And I think there's a gluc in certain sectors that will get pulled back. Traditional view is when the economies are growing people spend on the top line, front office stuff, sales, marketing. If you go and look at just the cloud 100 companies, which are the hottest private companies, and maybe with the public market companies, there's way too many companies focused on sales and marketing. Way too many. I think during a downsizing and recession, that's going to probably shrink some, because they were all built for the 2009 to 2021 era, where it was all about the top line. Okay, maybe there's now a proposition for companies who are focused on cost optimization, supply chain visibility. Security's been intangible, that I think is going to continue to an investment. So I tell, listen, if you are a tech investor or if you're an operator, pay attention to CIO priorities. And right now, in our business at Cohesity, part of the reason we've embraced things like ransomware protection, there is a big focus on security. And you know, by intelligently being a management and a security company around data, I do believe we'll continue to be extremely relevant to CIO budgets. There's a ransomware, 20 ransomware attempts every second. So things of that kind make you relevant in a bank. You have to stay relevant to a buying pattern or else you lose momentum. >> But I think what's happening now is actually IT spending's pretty good. I mean, I track this stuff pretty closely. It's just that expectations were so high and now you're seeing earnings estimates come down and so, okay, and then you, yeah, you've got the, you know the inflationary factors and your discounted cash flows but the market's actually pretty good. >> Yeah. >> You know, relative to other downturns that if this is not a... We're not actually not in a downturn. >> Yeah. >> Not yet anyway. It may be. >> There's a valuation there. >> You have to prepare. >> Not sales. >> Yeah, that's right. >> When I was on CNBC, I said "listen, it's a little bit like that story of Joseph. Seven years of feast, seven years of famine." You have to prepare for potentially your worst. And if it's not the worst, you're in good shape. So will it be a recession 2023? Maybe. You know, high interest rates, inflation, war in Russia, Ukraine, maybe things do get bad. But if you belt tightening, if you're focused in operational excellence, if it's not a recession, you're pleasantly surprised. If it is one, you're prepared for it. >> All right. I'm going to put you in the spot and ask you for predictions. Expert analysis on the World Cup. What do you think? Give us the breakdown. (group laughs) >> As my... I wish India was in the World Cup, but you can't get enough Indians at all to play soccer well enough, but we're not, >> You play cricket, though. >> I'm a US man first. I would love to see one of Brazil, or Argentina. And as a Messi person, I don't know if you'll get that, but it would be really special for Messi to lead, to end his career like Maradonna winning a World Cup. I don't know if that'll happen. I'm probably going to go one of the Latin American countries, if the US doesn't make it far enough. But first loyalty to the US team, and then after one of the Latin American countries. >> And you think one of the Latin American countries is best bet to win or? >> I don't know. It's hard to tell. They're all... What happens now at this stage >> So close, right? >> is anybody could win. >> Yeah. You just have lots of shots of gold. I'm a big soccer fan. It could, I mean, I don't know if the US is favored to win, but if they get far enough, you get to the finals, anybody could win. >> I think they get Netherlands next, right? >> That's tough. >> Really tough. >> But... The European teams are good too, but I would like to see US go far enough, and then I'd like to see Latin America with team one of Argentina, or Brazil. That's my prediction. >> I know you're a big Cricket fan. Are you able to follow Cricket the way you like? >> At god unearthly times the night because they're in Australia, right? >> Oh yeah. >> Yeah. >> I watched the T-20 World Cup, select games of it. Yeah, you know, I'm not rapidly following every single game but the World Cup games, I catch you. >> Yeah, it's good. >> It's good. I mean, I love every sport. American football, soccer. >> That's great. >> You get into basketball now, I mean, I hope the Warriors come back strong. Hey, how about the Warriors Celtics? What do we think? We do it again? >> Well- >> This year. >> I'll tell you what- >> As a Boston Celtics- >> I would love that. I actually still, I have to pay off some folks from Palo Alto office with some bets still. We are seeing unprecedented NBA performance this year. >> Yeah. >> It's amazing. You look at the stats, it's like nothing. I know it's early. Like nothing we've ever seen before. So it's exciting. >> Well, always a pleasure talking to you guys. >> Great to have you on. >> Thanks for having me. >> Thank you. Love the expert analysis. >> Sanjay Poonen. Dave Vellante. Keep it right there. re:Invent 2022, day four. We're winding up in Las Vegas. We'll be right back. You're watching theCUBE, the leader in enterprise and emerging tech coverage. (lighthearted soft music)
SUMMARY :
When we used to, you know, Yeah. So you wonder, 20 years from now, out to be prophetic. But, you know- I mean, when you think you know, watching from, I feel like this was bigger than 2019 I think it was 60,000 But it feels like it's more active. But you know, let me ask you a question So this is an important, you know, both... I wonder the, you I mean, you have to be a ostrich you know, others that are so But I call it the slingshot economy. I just want to pay, you or announcing, you know, better But so what are you seeing out there? I mean, if you got core, you know, pretty aggressive. I think I shot to a $10 billion, you know, like almost rule of 95. So I think, you know, that's, I seek to do at our com. I mean listen, you and you certainly look Because you want to Now in the long arc of time, on the quarter to quarter, I want to ask you about And you know, by intelligently But I think what's happening now relative to other downturns It may be. But if you belt tightening, to put you in the spot but you can't get enough Indians at all But first loyalty to the US team, It's hard to tell. if the US is favored to win, and then I'd like to see Latin America the way you like? Yeah, you know, I'm not rapidly I mean, I love every sport. I mean, I hope the to pay off some folks You look at the stats, it's like nothing. talking to you guys. Love the expert analysis. in enterprise and emerging tech coverage.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Andy | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave Vellante | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Messi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjay Poonen | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Frank | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Dave | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Microsoft | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Werner | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Amazon | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
Paul Gillin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Adam | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Steve Bomber | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Sanjay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Jony Ive | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$2 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Dell | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2019 | DATE | 0.99+ |
2011 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Peter DeSantis | PERSON | 0.99+ |
$150 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
$10 billion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Paul | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last week | DATE | 0.99+ |
Australia | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Isaac Newton | PERSON | 0.99+ |
last month | DATE | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
2009 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Slootman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
60,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Goldman Sachs | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Arvind Krishna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Tenable | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
2 trillion | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Cohesity | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
50,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Ruba | PERSON | 0.99+ |
24 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Boston Celtics | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
CyberArk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Oracle | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Maradonna | PERSON | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Wallace | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
World Cup | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Warriors | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
HPE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Morgan Stanleys | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Datadog | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Werner Vogels | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Palo Alto | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Super Bowl | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
World Cup | EVENT | 0.99+ |
Ajay Singh, Zebrium & Michael Nappi, ScienceLogic | AWS re:Invent 2022
(upbeat music) >> Good afternoon, fellow cloud nerds, and welcome back to theCUBE's live coverage of AWS re:Invent, here in a fabulous Sin City, Las Vegas, Nevada. My name is Savannah Peterson, joined by my fabulous co-host, John Furrier. John, how you feeling? >> Great, feeling good Just getting going. Day one of four more, three more days after today. >> Woo! Yeah. >> So much conversation. Talking about business transformation as cloud goes next level- >> Hot topic here for sure. >> Next generation. Data's classic is still around, but the next gen cloud's here, it's changing the game. Lot more AI, machine learning, a lot more business value. I think it's going to be exciting. Next segment's going to be awesome. >> It feels like one of those years where there's just a ton of momentum. I don't think it's just because we're back in person at scale, you can see the literally thousands of people behind us while we're here on set conducting these interviews. Our bold and brave guests, just like the two we have here, combating the noise, the libations, and everything else going on on the show floor. Please help me welcome Mike from Science Logic and Ajay from Zebrium. Gentlemen, welcome to the show floor. >> Thank you. >> Thank you Savannah. It's great to be here. >> How you feeling? Are you feeling the buzz, Mike? Feeling the energy? >> It's tough to not feel and hear the buzz, Savannah >> Savannah: Yeah. (all laughing) >> John: Can you hear me? >> Savannah: Yeah, yeah, yeah. Can you hear me now? What about you, Ajay? How's it feel to be here? >> Yeah, this is high energy. I'm really happy it's bounced back from COVID. I was a little concerned about attendance. This is hopping. >> Yeah, I feel it. It just, you can definitely feel the energy, the sense of community. We're all here for the right reasons. So I know that, I want to set the stage for everyone watching, Zebrium was recently acquired by Science Logic. Mike, can you tell us a little bit about that and what it means for the company? >> Mike: Sure, sure. Well, first of all, science logic, as you may know, has been in the monitoring space for a long time now, and what- >> Savannah: 20 years I believe. >> Yeah. >> Savannah: Just about. >> And what we've seen is a shift from kind of monitoring infrastructure, to monitoring these increasingly complex modern cloud native applications, right? And so this is part of a journey that we've been on at Science Logic to really modernize how enterprises of all sizes manage their IT estate. Okay? So, managing, now workloads that are increasingly in the public cloud, outside the four walls of the enterprise, workloads that are increasingly complex. They're microservices based, they're container based. >> Mhmm. >> Mike: And the rate of change, just because of things like CICD, and agile development has also increased the complexity in the typical IT environment. So all these things have conspired to make the traditional tools and processes of managing IT and IT applications much more difficult. They just don't scale. One of the things that we've seen recently, Savannah is this shift in sort of moving to cloud native applications, right? >> Huge shift. >> Mike: Today it only incorporates about roughly 25% of the typical IT portfolio, but most of the projections we've seen indicate that that's going to invert in about three years. 75% of applications will be what I call cloud native. And so this really requires different technologies to understand what's going on with those applications. And so Zebrium interested us when we were looking at partners at the beginning of this year as they have a super innovative approach to understanding really what's going on with any cloud native application. And they really distill, they separate the complexity out of the equation and they used machine learning to tremendous effect to rapidly understand the root cause of an application failure. And so I was introduced to Ajay, beginning of this year, actually. It feels like it's been a long time now. But we've been on this journey together throughout 2022, and we're thrilled to have Zebrium now, part of the Science Logic family. >> Ajay, Zebrium saves people a lot of time. Obviously, I've worked with developers and seen that struggle when things break, shortening that time to recovery and understanding is so critical. Can you tell us a little bit about what's under the hood and how the ML works to make that happen? >> Ajay: Yeah. So the goal is to figure out not just that something went wrong, but what went wrong. >> Savannah: Right. >> And we took, you know, based on a couple of decades of experience from my co-founders- >> Savannah: Casual couple of decades, came into went into this product just to call that out. Yeah, great. >> Exactly. It took some general learnings about the nature of software and when software breaks, what tends to happen, you tend to see unusual things happen, and they lead to bad things happening. It's very simple. >> Yes. >> It turns out- >> Savannah: Mutations lead to bad things happening, generally speaking. >> So what Zebrium's really good at is identifying those rare things accurately and then figuring out how they connect, or correlate to the bad things, the errors, the warnings, the alerts. So the machine learning has many stages to it, but at its heart it's classifying the event, catalog of any application stack, figuring out what's rare, and when things start to break it's telling you this cluster of events is both unusual, and unlikely to be random, and it's very likely the root cause report for the problem you're trying to solve. We then added some nice enhancements, such as correlation with knowledge spaces in, on the public internet. If someone's ever solved that problem before, we're able to find a match, and pull that back into our platform. But the at the heart, it was a technology that can find rare events and find the connections with other events. >> John: Yeah, and this is the theme of re:Invent this year, data, the role of data, solving end-to-end complexities. One, you mentioned that. Two, I think the Mike, your point about developers and the CICD pipeline is where DevOps is. That is what IT now is. So, if you take digital transformation to its conclusion, or its path and continue it, IT is DevOps. So the developers are actually doing the IT in their coding, hence the shift to autonomous IT. >> Mike: Right, right. Now, those other functions at IT used to be a department, not anymore, or they still are, so, but they'll go away, is security and data teams. You're starting to see the formation of- >> Mike: Yep. >> New replacements to IT as a function to support the developers who are building the applications that will be the company. >> That's right. Yeah. >> John: I mean that's, and do you agree with that statement? >> Yeah, I really do. And you know, collectively independent of whether it's like traditional IT, or it's DevOps, or whatever it is, the enterprise as a whole needs to understand how the infrastructure is deployed, the health of that infrastructure, and more importantly the applications that are hosted in the infrastructure. How are they doing? What's the health? And what we are seeing, and what we're trying to facilitate at Science Logic is really changed the lens of IT, from being low level compute, storage, and networking, to looking at everything through a services lens, looking at the services being delivered by IT, back to the business, and understanding things through a services lens. And Zebrium really compliments that mission that we've been on, by providing, cause a lot of cases, service equal equal application, and they can provide that kind of very real time view of service health in, you know, kind of the IT- >> And automation is beautiful there too, because, as you get into some of the scale- >> Yeah >> Ajay's. understanding how to do this fast is a key component. >> Yeah. So scale, you, you've pinpointed one of the dimensions that makes AI really important when it comes to troubleshooting. The humans just can't scale as fast as data, nor can they keep up with complexity of modern applications. And the third element that we feel is really important is the velocity with which people are now rolling out changes. People develop new features within hours, push them out to production. And in a world like that, the human has just no ability or time to understand what's normal, what's bad, to update their alert rules. And you need a machine, or an AI technology, to go help you with that. And that's basically what we're about. >> So this is where AI Ops comes in, right? Perfectly. Yeah. >> Yeah. You know, and John started to allude to it earlier, but having the insight on what's going on, we believe is only half of the equation, right? Once you understand what's going on, you naturally want to take action to remediate it or optimize it. And we believe automation should not be an exercise that's left to the reader. >> Yeah. >> As a lot of traditional platforms have done. Instead, we have a very robust, no-code, low-code automation built into our platform that allows you to take action in context with what you're seeing right then and there with the service. >> John: Yeah. Essentially monitoring, a term you use observability, some used as a fancy word today, is critical in all operating environments. So if we, if we kind of holistically, hey we're a distributed computing system, aka cloud, you got to track stuff at scale and you got to understand what it, what the impact is from a systems perspective. There's consequences to understanding what goes wrong. So as you look at that, what's the challenge for customers to do that? Because that seems to be the hard part as they lift and shift to the cloud, run their apps on the cloud, now they got to go take it to the next level, which is more developer velocity, faster productivity, and secure. >> Yeah. >> I mean, that seems to be the table stakes now. >> Yeah. >> How are companies forming around that? Are they there yet? Are they halfway there? Are they, where are they in the progression of, one, are they changing? And if so- >> Yeah that's a great question. I mean, I think whether it's an IT use case or a security use case, you can't manage what you don't know about. So visibility, discoverability, understanding what's going on, in a lot of ways that's the really hard problem to solve. And traditionally, we've approached that by like, harvesting data off of all these machines and devices in the infrastructure. But as we've seen with Zebrium and with related machine learning technologies, there's multiple ways of gaining insight as to what's going on. Once you have the insight be it an IT issue, like a service outage, or a security vulnerability, then you can take action. And the idea is you want to make that action as seamless as possible. But I think to answer your question, John, enterprises are still kind of getting their heads around how can we break down all the silos that have built up over the last decade or two, internally, and get visibility across the estate that really matters. And I think that's the real challenge. >> And I mean, and, at the velocity that applications are growing, just looking at our notes here, number of applications scaling from 64 million in 2017 to 147 million in 2021. That goes to what you were talking about, even with those other metrics earlier, 582 million by 2026 is what Morgan Stanley predicts. So, not only do we need to get out of silos we need to be able to see everything all the time, all at once, from the past legacy, as well as as we extend at scale. How are you thinking about that, Ajay? You're now with a big partner as an umbrella. What's next for you all? How, how are you going to help people solve problems faster? >> Yeah, so one of the attractions to the Zebrium team about Science Logic, aside from the team, and the culture, was the product portfolio was so complimentary. As Mike mentioned, you need visibility, you need mapping from low level building blocks to business services. And the end, at the end of the spectrum, once you know something's wrong you need to be able to take action automatically. And again, Science Logic has a very strong product, set of product capabilities and automated actions. What we bring to the table is the middle layer, which is from visibility, understanding what went wrong, figuring out the root cause. So to us, it was really exciting to be a very nice tuck in into this broader platform where we helped complete the story. >> Savannah: Yeah, that's, that's exciting. >> John: Should we do the Insta challenge? >> I was just getting ready to do that. You go for it John. You go ahead and kick it off. >> So we have this little tradition now, Instagram real, short and sweet. If you were going to see yourself on Instagram, what would be the Instagram reel of why this year's re:Invent is so important, and why people should pay attention to what's going on right now in the industry, or your company? >> Well, I think partly what Ajay was saying it's good to be back, right? So seeing just the energy and being back in 3D, you know en mass, is awesome again. It really is. >> Yeah. >> Mike: But, you know, I think this is where it's happening. We are at an inflection point of our industry and we're seeing a sea change in the way that applications and software delivered to businesses, to enterprises. And it's happening right here. This is the nexus of it. And so we're thrilled to be here as a part of all this, and excited about the future. >> All right, Ajay- >> Well done. He passes >> Your Instagram reel. >> Knowing what's happening in the broader economy, in the business context, it's, it feels even more important that companies like us are working on technologies that empower the same number of people to do more. Because it may not be realistic to just add on more headcount given what's going on in the world. But your deliverables and your roadmaps aren't slowing down. So, still the same amount of complexity, the same growth rates, but you're going to have to deal with all of that with fewer resources and be smarter about it. So, the approaches we're taking feel very much off the moment, you know, given what's going on in the real world. >> I love it. I love it. I've got, I've got kind of a finger to the wind, potentially hardball question for you here to close it out. But, given that you both have your finger really on the pulse right here, what percentage of current IT operations do you think will eventually be automated by AI and ML? Or AI ops? >> Well, I think a large percentage of traditional IT operations, and I'm talking about, you know, network operating center type of, you know, checking heartbeat monitors of compute storage and networking health. I think a lot of those things are going to be automated, right? Machine learning, just because of the scale. You can't scale, you can't hire enough NOC engineers to scale that kind of complexity. But I think IT talents, and what they're going to be focusing on is going shift, and they're going to be focusing on different parts. And I believe a lot of IT is going to be a much more of an enabler for the business, versus just managing things when they go wrong. So that's- >> All right. >> That's what I believe is part of the change. >> That's your, all right Ajay what about your hot take? >> Knowing how error-prone predictions are, (all laughing) I'll caveat my with- >> Savannah: We're allowing for human error here. >> I could be wildly wrong, but if I had to guess, you know, in 10 years you know, as much as 50% of the tasks will be automated. >> Mike: Oh, you- >> I love it. >> Mike: You threw a number out there. >> I love it. I love that he put his finger out- >> You got to see, you got to say the matrix. We're all going to be part of the matrix. >> Well, you know- >> And Star Trek- >> Skynet >> We can only turn back to this footage in a few years and quote you exactly when you have the, you know Mackenzie Research or the Morgan Stanley research that we've been mentioning here tonight and say that you've called it accurately. So I appreciate that. Ajay, it was wonderful to have you here. Congratulations on the acquisition. Thank you. Mike, thank you so much for being here on the Science Logic side, and congratulations to the team on 20 years. That's very exciting. John. Thank you. >> I try, I tried. Thank you. >> You try, you succeed. And thank you to all of our fabulous viewers out there at home. Be sure and tweet us at theCUBE. Say hello, Furrier, Sav is savvy. Let us know what you're thinking of AWS re:Invent where we are live from Las Vegas all week. You're watching theCUBE, the leader in high tech coverage. My name's Savannah Peterson, and we'll see you soon. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
John, how you feeling? Day one of four more, Yeah. So much conversation. I think it's going to be exciting. just like the two we have here, It's great to be here. Savannah: Yeah. How's it feel to be here? I was a little concerned about attendance. We're all here for the right reasons. has been in the monitoring space in the public cloud, One of the things that we've but most of the projections we've seen and how the ML works to make that happen? So the goal is to figure out just to call that out. and they lead to bad things happening. to bad things happening, and find the connections hence the shift to autonomous IT. You're starting to see the formation of- the developers who are Yeah. and more importantly the applications how to do this fast And the third element that So this is where AI of the equation, right? that allows you to take action and you got to understand what it, I mean, that seems to And the idea is you That goes to what you were talking about, And the end, at the end of the spectrum, Savannah: Yeah, I was just getting ready to do that. If you were going to see So seeing just the energy This is the nexus of it. that empower the same of a finger to the wind, and they're going to be is part of the change. Savannah: We're allowing you know, as much as 50% of the tasks I love that You got to see, you and congratulations to I try, I tried. and we'll see you soon.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Savannah | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Mike | PERSON | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Savannah Peterson | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ajay | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Ajay Singh | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Michael Nappi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
2017 | DATE | 0.99+ |
Star Trek | TITLE | 0.99+ |
20 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Las Vegas | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Mackenzie Research | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
75% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2021 | DATE | 0.99+ |
10 years | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
2022 | DATE | 0.99+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Science Logic | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
64 million | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
third element | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Today | DATE | 0.99+ |
50% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Zebrium | PERSON | 0.98+ |
2026 | DATE | 0.98+ |
582 million | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Zebrium | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
tonight | DATE | 0.97+ |
Sin City, Las Vegas, Nevada | LOCATION | 0.97+ |
Zebrium | TITLE | 0.97+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
four | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
Morgan Stanley | ORGANIZATION | 0.96+ |
147 million | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
Sav | PERSON | 0.95+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ | |
thousands of people | QUANTITY | 0.94+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
about three years | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
Day one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.9+ |
ScienceLogic | ORGANIZATION | 0.89+ |
this year | DATE | 0.88+ |
Skynet | TITLE | 0.87+ |
theCUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.87+ |
three more days | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
half | QUANTITY | 0.85+ |
Snehal Antani, Horizon3.ai | AWS Startup Showcase S2 E4 | Cybersecurity
(upbeat music) >> Hello and welcome to theCUBE's presentation of the AWS Startup Showcase. This is season two, episode four of the ongoing series covering the exciting hot startups from the AWS ecosystem. Here we're talking about cybersecurity in this episode. I'm your host, John Furrier here we're excited to have CUBE alumni who's back Snehal Antani who's the CEO and co-founder of Horizon3.ai talking about exploitable weaknesses and vulnerabilities with autonomous pen testing. Snehal, it's great to see you. Thanks for coming back. >> Likewise, John. I think it's been about five years since you and I were on the stage together. And I've missed it, but I'm glad to see you again. >> Well, before we get into the showcase about your new startup, that's extremely successful, amazing margins, great product. You have a unique journey. We talked about this prior to you doing the journey, but you have a great story. You left the startup world to go into the startup, like world of self defense, public defense, NSA. What group did you go to in the public sector became a private partner. >> My background, I'm a software engineer by education and trade. I started my career at IBM. I was a CIO at GE Capital, and I think we met once when I was there and I became the CTO of Splunk. And we spent a lot of time together when I was at Splunk. And at the end of 2017, I decided to take a break from industry and really kind of solve problems that I cared deeply about and solve problems that mattered. So I left industry and joined the US Special Operations Community and spent about four years in US Special Operations, where I grew more personally and professionally than in anything I'd ever done in my career. And exited that time, met my co-founder in special ops. And then as he retired from the air force, we started Horizon3. >> So there's really, I want to bring that up one, 'cause it's fascinating that not a lot of people in Silicon Valley and tech would do that. So thanks for the service. And I know everyone who's out there in the public sector knows that this is a really important time for the tactical edge in our military, a lot of things going on around the world. So thanks for the service and a great journey. But there's a storyline with the company you're running now that you started. I know you get the jacket on there. I noticed get a little military vibe to it. Cybersecurity, I mean, every company's on their own now. They have to build their own militia. There is no government supporting companies anymore. There's no militia. No one's on the shores of our country defending the citizens and the companies, they got to offend for themselves. So every company has to have their own military. >> In many ways, you don't see anti-aircraft rocket launchers on top of the JP Morgan building in New York City because they rely on the government for air defense. But in cyber it's very different. Every company is on their own to defend for themselves. And what's interesting is this blend. If you look at the Ukraine, Russia war, as an example, a thousand companies have decided to withdraw from the Russian economy and those thousand companies we should expect to be in the ire of the Russian government and their proxies at some point. And so it's not just those companies, but their suppliers, their distributors. And it's no longer about cyber attack for extortion through ransomware, but rather cyber attack for punishment and retaliation for leaving. Those companies are on their own to defend themselves. There's no government that is dedicated to supporting them. So yeah, the reality is that cybersecurity, it's the burden of the organization. And also your attack surface has expanded to not just be your footprint, but if an adversary wants to punish you for leaving their economy, they can get, if you're in agriculture, they could disrupt your ability to farm or they could get all your fruit to spoil at the border 'cause they disrupted your distributors and so on. So I think the entire world is going to change over the next 18 to 24 months. And I think this idea of cybersecurity is going to become truly a national problem and a problem that breaks down any corporate barriers that we see in previously. >> What are some of the things that inspired you to start this company? And I loved your approach of thinking about the customer, your customer, as defending themselves in context to threats, really leaning into it, being ready and able to defend. Horizon3 has a lot of that kind of military thinking for the good of the company. What's the motivation? Why this company? Why now? What's the value proposition? >> So there's two parts to why the company and why now. The first part was what my observation, when I left industry realm or my military background is watching "Jack Ryan" and "Tropic Thunder" and I didn't come from the military world. And so when I entered the special operations community, step one was to keep my mouth shut, learn, listen, and really observe and understand what made that community so impressive. And obviously the people and it's not about them being fast runners or great shooters or awesome swimmers, but rather there are learn-it-alls that can solve any problem as a team under pressure, which is the exact culture you want to have in any startup, early stage companies are learn-it-alls that can solve any problem under pressure as a team. So I had this immediate advantage when we started Horizon3, where a third of Horizon3 employees came from that special operations community. So one is this awesome talent. But the second part that, I remember this quote from a special operations commander that said we use live rounds in training because if we used fake rounds or rubber bullets, everyone would act like metal of honor winners. And the whole idea there is you train like you fight, you build that muscle memory for crisis and response and so on upfront. So when you're in the thick of it, you already know how to react. And this aligns to a pain I had in industry. I had no idea I was secure until the bad guy showed up. I had no idea if I was fixing the right vulnerabilities, logging the right data in Splunk, or if my CrowdStrike EDR platform was configured correctly, I had to wait for the bad guys to show up. I didn't know if my people knew how to respond to an incident. So what I wanted to do was proactively verify my security posture, proactively harden my systems. I needed to do that by continuously pen testing myself or continuously testing my security posture. And there just wasn't any way to do that where an IT admin or a network engineer could in three clicks have the power of a 20 year pen testing expert. And that was really what we set out to do, not build a autonomous pen testing platform for security people, build it so that anybody can quickly test their security posture and then use the output to fix problems that truly matter. >> So the value preposition, if I get this right is, there's a lot of companies out there doing pen tests. And I know I hate pen tests. They're like, cause you do DevOps, it changes you got to do another pen test. So it makes sense to do autonomous pen testing. So congratulations on seeing that that's obvious to that, but a lot of other have consulting tied to it. Which seems like you need to train someone and you guys taking a different approach. >> Yeah, we actually, as a company have zero consulting, zero professional services. And the whole idea is that build a true software as a service offering where an intern, in fact, we've got a video of a nine year old that in three clicks can run pen tests against themselves. And because of that, you can wire pen tests into your DevOps tool chain. You can run multiple pen tests today. In fact, I've got customers running 40, 50 pen tests a month against their organization. And that what that does is completely lowers the barrier of entry for being able to verify your posture. If you have consulting on average, when I was a CIO, it was at least a three month lead time to schedule consultants to show up and then they'd show up, they'd embarrass the security team, they'd make everyone look bad, 'cause they're going to get in, leave behind a report. And that report was almost identical to what they found last year because the older that report, the one the date itself gets stale, the context changes and so on. And then eventually you just don't even bother fixing it. Or if you fix a problem, you don't have the skills to verify that has been fixed. So I think that consulting led model was acceptable when you viewed security as a compliance checkbox, where once a year was sufficient to meet your like PCI requirements. But if you're really operating with a wartime mindset and you actually need to harden and secure your environment, you've got to be running pen test regularly against your organization from different perspectives, inside, outside, from the cloud, from work, from home environments and everything in between. >> So for the CISOs out there, for the CSOs and the CXOs, what's the pitch to them because I see your jacket that says Horizon3 AI, trust but verify. But this trust is, but is canceled out, just as verify. What's the product that you guys are offering the service. Describe what it is and why they should look at it. >> Yeah, sure. So one, when I back when I was the CIO, don't tell me we're secure in PowerPoint. Show me we're secure right now. Show me we're secure again tomorrow. And then show me we're secure again next week because my environment is constantly changing and the adversary always has a vote and they're always evolving. And this whole idea of show me we're secure. Don't trust that your security tools are working, verify that they can detect and respond and stifle an attack and then verify tomorrow, verify next week. That's the big mind shift. Now what we do is-- >> John: How do they respond to that by the way? Like they don't believe you at first or what's the story. >> I think, there's actually a very bifurcated response. There are still a decent chunk of CIOs and CSOs that have a security is a compliance checkbox mindset. So my attitude with them is I'm not going to convince you. You believe it's a checkbox. I'll just wait for you to get breached and sell to your replacement, 'cause you'll get fired. And in the meantime, I spend all my energy with those that actually care about proactively securing and hardening their environments. >> That's true. People do get fired. Can you give an example of what you're saying about this environment being ready, proving that you're secure today, tomorrow and a few weeks out. Give me an example. >> Of, yeah, I'll give you actually a customer example. There was a healthcare organization and they had about 5,000 hosts in their environment and they did everything right. They had Fortinet as their EDR platform. They had user behavior analytics in place that they had purchased and tuned. And when they ran a pen test self-service, our product node zero immediately started to discover every host on the network. It then fingerprinted all those hosts and found it was able to get code execution on three machines. So it got code execution, dumped credentials, laterally maneuvered, and became a domain administrator, which in IT, if an attacker becomes a domain admin, they've got keys to the kingdom. So at first the question was, how did the node zero pen test become domain admin? How'd they get code execution, Fortinet should have detected and stopped it. Well, it turned out Fortinet was misconfigured on three boxes out of 5,000. And these guys had no idea and it's just automation that went wrong and so on. And now they would've only known they had misconfigured their EDR platform on three hosts if the attacker had showed up. The second question though was, why didn't they catch the lateral movement? Which all their marketing brochures say they're supposed to catch. And it turned out that that customer purchased the wrong Fortinet modules. One again, they had no idea. They thought they were doing the right thing. So don't trust just installing your tools is good enough. You've got to exercise and verify them. We've got tons of stories from patches that didn't actually apply to being able to find the AWS admin credentials on a local file system. And then using that to log in and take over the cloud. In fact, I gave this talk at Black Hat on war stories from running 10,000 pen tests. And that's just the reality is, you don't know that these tools and processes are working for you until the bad guys have shown. >> The velocities there. You can accelerate through logs, you know from the days you've been there. This is now the threat. Being, I won't say lazy, but just not careful or just not thinking. >> Well, I'll do an example. We have a lot of customers that are Horizon3 customers and Splunk customers. And what you'll see their behavior is, is they'll have Horizon3 up on one screen. And every single attacker command executed with its timestamp is up on that screen. And then look at Splunk and say, hey, we were able to dump vCenter credentials from VMware products at this time on this host, what did Splunk see or what didn't they see? Why were no logs generated? And it turns out that they had some logging blind spots. So what they'll actually do is run us to almost like stimulate the defensive tools and then see what did the tools catch? What did they miss? What are those blind spots and how do they fix it. >> So your price called node zero. You mentioned that. Is that specifically a suite, a tool, a platform. How do people consume and engage with you guys? >> So the way that we work, the whole product is designed to be self-service. So once again, while we have a sales team, the whole intent is you don't need to have to talk to a sales rep to start using the product, you can log in right now, go to Horizon3.ai, you can run a trial log in with your Google ID, your LinkedIn ID, start running pen test against your home or against your network against this organization right now, without talking to anybody. The whole idea is self-service, run a pen test in three clicks and give you the power of that 20 year pen testing expert. And then what'll happen is node zero will execute and then it'll provide to you a full report of here are all of the different paths or attack paths or sequences where we are able to become an admin in your environment. And then for every attack path, here is the path or the kill chain, the proof of exploitation for every step along the way. Here's exactly what you've got to do to fix it. And then once you've fixed it, here's how you verify that you've truly fixed the problem. And this whole aha moment is run us to find problems. You fix them, rerun us to verify that the problem has been fixed. >> Talk about the company, how many people do you have and get some stats? >> Yeah, so we started writing code in January of 2020, right before the pandemic hit. And then about 10 months later at the end of 2020, we launched the first version of the product. We've been in the market for now about two and a half years total from start of the company till present. We've got 130 employees. We've got more customers than we do employees, which is really cool. And instead our customers shift from running one pen test a year to 40, 50 pen test. >> John: And it's full SaaS. >> The whole product is full SaaS. So no consulting, no pro serve. You run as often as you-- >> Who's downloading, who's buying the product. >> What's amazing is, we have customers in almost every section or sector now. So we're not overly rotated towards like healthcare or financial services. We've got state and local education or K through 12 education, state and local government, a number of healthcare companies, financial services, manufacturing. We've got organizations that large enterprises. >> John: Security's diverse. >> It's very diverse. >> I mean, ransomware must be a big driver. I mean, is that something that you're seeing a lot. >> It is. And the thing about ransomware is, if you peel back the outcome of ransomware, which is extortion, at the end of the day, what ransomware organizations or criminals or APTs will do is they'll find out who all your employees are online. They will then figure out if you've got 7,000 employees, all it takes is one of them to have a bad password. And then attackers are going to credential spray to find that one person with a bad password or whose Netflix password that's on the dark web is also their same password to log in here, 'cause most people reuse. And then from there they're going to most likely in your organization, the domain user, when you log in, like you probably have local admin on your laptop. If you're a windows machine and I've got local admin on your laptop, I'm going to be able to dump credentials, get the admin credentials and then start to laterally maneuver. Attackers don't have to hack in using zero days like you see in the movies, often they're logging in with valid user IDs and passwords that they've found and collected from somewhere else. And then they make that, they maneuver by making a low plus a low equal a high. And the other thing in financial services, we spend all of our time fixing critical vulnerabilities, attackers know that. So they've adapted to finding ways to chain together, low priority vulnerabilities and misconfigurations and dangerous defaults to become admin. So while we've over rotated towards just fixing the highs and the criticals attackers have adapted. And once again they have a vote, they're always evolving their tactics. >> And how do you prevent that from happening? >> So we actually apply those same tactics. Rarely do we actually need a CVE to compromise your environment. We will harvest credentials, just like an attacker. We will find misconfigurations and dangerous defaults, just like an attacker. We will combine those together. We'll make use of exploitable vulnerabilities as appropriate and use that to compromise your environment. So the tactics that, in many ways we've built a digital weapon and the tactics we apply are the exact same tactics that are applied by the adversary. >> So you guys basically simulate hacking. >> We actually do the hacking. Simulate means there's a fakeness to it. >> So you guys do hack. >> We actually compromise. >> Like sneakers the movie, those sneakers movie for the old folks like me. >> And in fact that was my inspiration. I've had this idea for over a decade now, which is I want to be able to look at anything that laptop, this Wi-Fi network, gear in hospital or a truck driving by and know, I can figure out how to gain initial access, rip that environment apart and be able to opponent. >> Okay, Chuck, he's not allowed in the studio anymore. (laughs) No, seriously. Some people are exposed. I mean, some companies don't have anything. But there's always passwords or so most people have that argument. Well, there's nothing to protect here. Not a lot of sensitive data. How do you respond to that? Do you see that being kind of putting the head in the sand or? >> Yeah, it's actually, it's less, there's not sensitive data, but more we've installed or applied multifactor authentication, attackers can't get in now. Well MFA only applies or does not apply to lower level protocols. So I can find a user ID password, log in through SMB, which isn't protected by multifactor authentication and still upon your environment. So unfortunately I think as a security industry, we've become very good at giving a false sense of security to organizations. >> John: Compliance drives that behavior. >> Compliance drives that. And what we need. Back to don't tell me we're secure, show me, we've got to, I think, change that to a trust but verify, but get rid of the trust piece of it, just to verify. >> Okay, we got a lot of CISOs and CSOs watching this showcase, looking at the hot startups, what's the message to the executives there. Do they want to become more leaning in more hawkish if you will, to use the military term on security? I mean, I heard one CISO say, security first then compliance 'cause compliance can make you complacent and then you're unsecure at that point. >> I actually say that. I agree. One definitely security is different and more important than being compliant. I think there's another emerging concept, which is I'd rather be defensible than secure. What I mean by that is security is a point in time state. I am secure right now. I may not be secure tomorrow 'cause something's changed. But if I'm defensible, then what I have is that muscle memory to detect, respondent and stifle an attack. And that's what's more important. Can I detect you? How long did it take me to detect you? Can I stifle you from achieving your objective? How long did it take me to stifle you? What did you use to get in to gain access? How long did that sit in my environment? How long did it take me to fix it? So on and so forth. But I think it's being defensible and being able to rapidly adapt to changing tactics by the adversary is more important. >> This is the evolution of how the red line never moved. You got the adversaries in our networks and our banks. Now they hang out and they wait. So everyone thinks they're secure. But when they start getting hacked, they're not really in a position to defend, the alarms go off. Where's the playbook. Team springs into action. I mean, you kind of get the visual there, but this is really the issue being defensible means having your own essentially military for your company. >> Being defensible, I think has two pieces. One is you've got to have this culture and process in place of training like you fight because you want to build that incident response muscle memory ahead of time. You don't want to have to learn how to respond to an incident in the middle of the incident. So that is that proactively verifying your posture and continuous pen testing is critical there. The second part is the actual fundamentals in place so you can detect and stifle as appropriate. And also being able to do that. When you are continuously verifying your posture, you need to verify your entire posture, not just your test systems, which is what most people do. But you have to be able to safely pen test your production systems, your cloud environments, your perimeter. You've got to assume that the bad guys are going to get in, once they're in, what can they do? So don't just say that my perimeter's secure and I'm good to go. It's the soft squishy center that attackers are going to get into. And from there, can you detect them and can you stop them? >> Snehal, take me through the use. You got to be sold on this, I love this topic. Alright, pen test. Is it, what am I buying? Just pen test as a service. You mentioned dark web. Are you actually buying credentials online on behalf of the customer? What is the product? What am I buying if I'm the CISO from Horizon3? What's the service? What's the product, be specific. >> So very specifically and one just principles. The first principle is when I was a buyer, I hated being nickled and dimed buyer vendors, which was, I had to buy 15 different modules in order to achieve an objective. Just give me one line item, make it super easy to buy and don't nickel and dime me. Because I've spent time as a buyer that very much has permeated throughout the company. So there is a single skew from Horizon3. It is an annual subscription based on how big your environment is. And it is inclusive of on-prem internal pen tests, external pen tests, cloud attacks, work from home attacks, our ability to harvest credentials from the dark web and from open source sources. Being able to crack those credentials, compromise. All of that is included as a singles skew. All you get as a CISO is a singles skew, annual subscription, and you can run as many pen tests as you want. Some customers still stick to, maybe one pen test a quarter, but most customers shift when they realize there's no limit, we don't nickel and dime. They can run 10, 20, 30, 40 a month. >> Well, it's not nickel and dime in the sense that, it's more like dollars and hundreds because they know what to expect if it's classic cloud consumption. They kind of know what their environment, can people try it. Let's just say I have a huge environment, I have a cloud, I have an on-premise private cloud. Can I dabble and set parameters around pricing? >> Yes you can. So one is you can dabble and set perimeter around scope, which is like manufacturing does this, do not touch the production line that's on at the moment. We've got a hospital that says every time they run a pen test, any machine that's actually connected to a patient must be excluded. So you can actually set the parameters for what's in scope and what's out of scope up front, most again we're designed to be safe to run against production so you can set the parameters for scope. You can set the parameters for cost if you want. But our recommendation is I'd rather figure out what you can afford and let you test everything in your environment than try to squeeze every penny from you by only making you buy what can afford as a smaller-- >> So the variable ratio, if you will is, how much they spend is the size of their environment and usage. >> Just size of the environment. >> So it could be a big ticket item for a CISO then. >> It could, if you're really large, but for the most part-- >> What's large? >> I mean, if you were Walmart, well, let me back up. What I heard is global 10 companies spend anywhere from 50 to a hundred million dollars a year on security testing. So they're already spending a ton of money, but they're spending it on consultants that show up maybe a couple of times a year. They don't have, humans can't scale to test a million hosts in your environment. And so you're already spending that money, spend a fraction of that and use us and run as much as you want. And that's really what it comes down to. >> John: All right. So what's the response from customers? >> What's really interesting is there are three use cases. The first is that SOC manager that is using us to verify that their security tools are actually working. So their Splunk environment is logging the right data. It's integrating properly with CrowdStrike, it's integrating properly with their active directory services and their password policies. So the SOC manager is using us to verify the effectiveness of their security controls. The second use case is the IT director that is using us to proactively harden their systems. Did they install VMware correctly? Did they install their Cisco gear correctly? Are they patching right? And then the third are for the companies that are lucky to have their own internal pen test and red teams where they use us like a force multiplier. So if you've got 10 people on your red team and you still have a million IPs or hosts in your environment, you still don't have enough people for that coverage. So they'll use us to do recon at scale and attack at scale and let the humans focus on the really juicy hard stuff that humans are successful at. >> Love the product. Again, I'm trying to think about how I engage on the test. Is there pilots? Is there a demo version? >> There's a free trials. So we do 30 day free trials. The output can actually be used to meet your SOC 2 requirements. So in many ways you can just use us to get a free SOC 2 pen test report right now, if you want. Go to the website, log in for a free trial, you can log into your Google ID or your LinkedIn ID, run a pen test against your organization and use that to answer your PCI segmentation test requirements, your SOC 2 requirements, but you will be hooked. You will want to run us more often. And you'll get a Horizon3 tattoo. >> The first hits free as they say in the drug business. >> Yeah. >> I mean, so you're seeing that kind of response then, trial converts. >> It's exactly. In fact, we have a very well defined aha moment, which is you run us to find, you fix, you run us to verify, we have 100% technical win rate when our customers hit a find, fix, verify cycle, then it's about budget and urgency. But 100% technical win rate because of that aha moment, 'cause people realize, holy crap, I don't have to wait six months to verify that my problems have actually been fixed. I can just come in, click, verify, rerun the entire pen test or rerun a very specific part of it on what I just patched my environment. >> Congratulations, great stuff. You're here part of the AWS Startup Showcase. So I have to ask, what's the relationship with AWS, you're on their cloud. What kind of actions going on there? Is there secret sauce on there? What's going on? >> So one is we are AWS customers ourselves, our brains command and control infrastructure. All of our analytics are all running on AWS. It's amazing, when we run a pen test, we are able to use AWS and we'll spin up a virtual private cloud just for that pen test. It's completely ephemeral, it's all Lambda functions and graph analytics and other techniques. When the pen test ends, you can delete, there's a single use Docker container that gets deleted from your environment so you have nothing on-prem to deal with and the entire virtual private cloud tears itself down. So at any given moment, if we're running 50 pen tests or a hundred pen tests, self-service, there's a hundred virtual private clouds being managed in AWS that are spinning up, running and tearing down. It's an absolutely amazing underlying platform for us to make use of. Two is that many customers that have hybrid environments. So they've got a cloud infrastructure, an Office 365 infrastructure and an on-prem infrastructure. We are a single attack platform that can test all of that together. No one else can do it. And so the AWS customers that are especially AWS hybrid customers are the ones that we do really well targeting. >> Got it. And that's awesome. And that's the benefit of cloud? >> Absolutely. And the AWS marketplace. What's absolutely amazing is the competitive advantage being part of the marketplace has for us, because the simple thing is my customers, if they already have dedicated cloud spend, they can use their approved cloud spend to pay for Horizon3 through the marketplace. So you don't have to, if you already have that budget dedicated, you can use that through the marketplace. The other is you've already got the vendor processes in place, you can purchase through your existing AWS account. So what I love about the AWS company is one, the infrastructure we use for our own pen test, two, the marketplace, and then three, the customers that span that hybrid cloud environment. That's right in our strike zone. >> Awesome. Well, congratulations. And thanks for being part of the showcase and I'm sure your product is going to do very, very well. It's very built for what people want. Self-service get in, get the value quickly. >> No agents to install, no consultants to hire. safe to run against production. It's what I wanted. >> Great to see you and congratulations and what a great story. And we're going to keep following you. Thanks for coming on. >> Snehal: Phenomenal. Thank you, John. >> This is the AWS Startup Showcase. I'm John John Furrier, your host. This is season two, episode four on cybersecurity. Thanks for watching. (upbeat music)
SUMMARY :
of the AWS Startup Showcase. I'm glad to see you again. to you doing the journey, and I became the CTO of Splunk. and the companies, they got over the next 18 to 24 months. And I loved your approach of and "Tropic Thunder" and I didn't come from the military world. So the value preposition, And the whole idea is that build a true What's the product that you and the adversary always has a vote Like they don't believe you and sell to your replacement, Can you give an example And that's just the reality is, This is now the threat. the defensive tools and engage with you guys? the whole intent is you We've been in the market for now about So no consulting, no pro serve. who's buying the product. So we're not overly rotated I mean, is that something and the criticals attackers have adapted. and the tactics we apply We actually do the hacking. Like sneakers the movie, and be able to opponent. kind of putting the head in the sand or? and still upon your environment. that to a trust but verify, looking at the hot startups, and being able to rapidly This is the evolution of and I'm good to go. What is the product? and you can run as many and dime in the sense that, So you can actually set the So the variable ratio, if you will is, So it could be a big and run as much as you want. So what's the response from customers? and let the humans focus on about how I engage on the test. So in many ways you can just use us they say in the drug business. I mean, so you're seeing I don't have to wait six months to verify So I have to ask, what's When the pen test ends, you can delete, And that's the benefit of cloud? And the AWS marketplace. And thanks for being part of the showcase no consultants to hire. Great to see you and congratulations This is the AWS Startup Showcase.
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
Walmart | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
40 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Snehal | PERSON | 0.99+ |
January of 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
John | PERSON | 0.99+ |
AWS | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
John Furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
10 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Silicon Valley | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
Chuck | PERSON | 0.99+ |
Snehal Antani | PERSON | 0.99+ |
two parts | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
two pieces | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
30 day | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Tropic Thunder | TITLE | 0.99+ |
100% | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Cisco | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
20 year | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
GE Capital | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
30 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
next week | DATE | 0.99+ |
20 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
New York City | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
130 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
IBM | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 people | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
tomorrow | DATE | 0.99+ |
7,000 employees | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
PowerPoint | TITLE | 0.99+ |
third | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Splunk | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
10 companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
5,000 | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
six months | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
end of 2020 | DATE | 0.99+ |
ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ | |
one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
15 different modules | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
last year | DATE | 0.99+ |
Two | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CUBE | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
first part | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
One | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first version | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
Horizon3 | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
three machines | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
CrowdStrike | TITLE | 0.98+ |
first principle | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one screen | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one person | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
thousand companies | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
SOC 2 | TITLE | 0.98+ |
Jack Ryan | TITLE | 0.98+ |
one line item | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about two and a half years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
two | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
three use cases | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
zero days | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
hundreds | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
about four years | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Breaking Analysis Further defining Supercloud W/ tech leaders VMware, Snowflake, Databricks & others
from the cube studios in palo alto in boston bringing you data driven insights from the cube and etr this is breaking analysis with dave vellante at our inaugural super cloud 22 event we further refined the concept of a super cloud iterating on the definition the salient attributes and some examples of what is and what is not a super cloud welcome to this week's wikibon cube insights powered by etr you know snowflake has always been what we feel is one of the strongest examples of a super cloud and in this breaking analysis from our studios in palo alto we unpack our interview with benoit de javille co-founder and president of products at snowflake and we test our super cloud definition on the company's data cloud platform and we're really looking forward to your feedback first let's examine how we defl find super cloudant very importantly one of the goals of super cloud 22 was to get the community's input on the definition and iterate on previous work super cloud is an emerging computing architecture that comprises a set of services which are abstracted from the underlying primitives of hyperscale clouds we're talking about services such as compute storage networking security and other native tooling like machine learning and developer tools to create a global system that spans more than one cloud super cloud as shown on this slide has five essential properties x number of deployment models and y number of service models we're looking for community input on x and y and on the first point as well so please weigh in and contribute now we've identified these five essential elements of a super cloud let's talk about these first the super cloud has to run its services on more than one cloud leveraging the cloud native tools offered by each of the cloud providers the builder of the super cloud platform is responsible for optimizing the underlying primitives of each cloud and optimizing for the specific needs be it cost or performance or latency or governance data sharing security etc but those primitives must be abstracted such that a common experience is delivered across the clouds for both users and developers the super cloud has a metadata intelligence layer that can maximize efficiency for the specific purpose of the super cloud i.e the purpose that the super cloud is intended for and it does so in a federated model and it includes what we call a super pass this is a prerequisite that is a purpose-built component and enables ecosystem partners to customize and monetize incremental services while at the same time ensuring that the common experiences exist across clouds now in terms of deployment models we'd really like to get more feedback on this piece but here's where we are so far based on the feedback we got at super cloud 22. we see three deployment models the first is one where a control plane may run on one cloud but supports data plane interactions with more than one other cloud the second model instantiates the super cloud services on each individual cloud and within regions and can support interactions across more than one cloud with a unified interface connecting those instantiations those instances to create a common experience and the third model superimposes its services as a layer or in the case of snowflake they call it a mesh on top of the cloud on top of the cloud providers region or regions with a single global instantiation a single global instantiation of those services which spans multiple cloud providers this is our understanding from a comfort the conversation with benoit dejaville as to how snowflake approaches its solutions and for now we're going to park the service models we need to more time to flesh that out and we'll propose something shortly for you to comment on now we peppered benoit dejaville at super cloud 22 to test how the snowflake data cloud aligns to our concepts and our definition let me also say that snowflake doesn't use the term data cloud they really want to respect and they want to denigrate the importance of their hyperscale partners nor do we but we do think the hyperscalers today anyway are building or not building what we call super clouds but they are but but people who bar are building super clouds are building on top of hyperscale clouds that is a prerequisite so here are the questions that we tested with snowflake first question how does snowflake architect its data cloud and what is its deployment model listen to deja ville talk about how snowflake has architected a single system play the clip there are several ways to do this you know uh super cloud as as you name them the way we we we picked is is to create you know one single system and that's very important right the the the um [Music] there are several ways right you can instantiate you know your solution uh in every region of a cloud and and you know potentially that region could be a ws that region could be gcp so you are indeed a multi-cloud solution but snowflake we did it differently we are really creating cloud regions which are superposed on top of the cloud provider you know region infrastructure region so we are building our regions but but where where it's very different is that each region of snowflake is not one in instantiation of our service our service is global by nature we can move data from one region to the other when you land in snowflake you land into one region but but you can grow from there and you can you know exist in multiple clouds at the same time and that's very important right it's not one single i mean different instantiation of a system is one single instantiation which covers many cloud regions and many cloud providers snowflake chose the most advanced level of our three deployment models dodgeville talked about too presumably so it could maintain maximum control and ensure that common experience like the iphone model next we probed about the technical enablers of the data cloud listen to deja ville talk about snow grid he uses the term mesh and then this can get confusing with the jamaicani's data mesh concept but listen to benoit's explanation well as i said you know first we start by building you know snowflake regions we have today furry region that spawn you know the world so it's a worldwide worldwide system with many regions but all these regions are connected together they are you know meshed together with our technology we name it snow grid and that makes it hard because you know regions you know azure region can talk to a ws region or gcp regions and and as a as a user of our cloud you you don't see really these regional differences that you know regions are in different you know potentially clown when you use snowflake you can exist your your presence as an organization can be in several regions several clouds if you want geographic and and and both geographic and cloud provider so i can share data irrespective of the the cloud and i'm in the snowflake data cloud is that correct i can do that today exactly and and that's very critical right what we wanted is to remove data silos and and when you instantiate a system in one single region and that system is locked in that region you cannot communicate with other parts of the world you are locking the data in one region right and we didn't want to do that we wanted you know data to be distributed the way customer wants it to be distributed across the world and potentially sharing data at world scale now maybe there are many ways to skin the other cat meaning perhaps if a platform does instantiate in multiple places there are ways to share data but this is how snowflake chose to approach the problem next question how do you deal with latency in this big global system this is really important to us because while snowflake has some really smart people working as engineers and and the like we don't think they've solved for the speed of light problem the best people working on it as we often joke listen to benoit deja ville's comments on this topic so yes and no the the way we do it it's very expensive to do that because generally if you want to join you know data which is in which are in different regions and different cloud it's going to be very expensive because you need to move you know data every time you join it so the way we do it is that you replicate the subset of data that you want to access from one region from other regions so you can create this data mesh but data is replicated to make it very cheap and very performant too and is the snow grid does that have the metadata intelligence yes to actually can you describe that a little bit yeah snow grid is both uh a way to to exchange you know metadata about so each region of snowflake knows about all the other regions of snowflake every time we create a new region diary you know the metadata is distributed over our data cloud not only you know region knows all the regions but knows you know every organization that exists in our clouds where this organization is where data can be replicated by this organization and then of course it's it's also used as a way to uh uh exchange data right so you can exchange you know beta by scale of data size and we just had i was just receiving an email from one of our customers who moved more than four petabytes of data cross-region cross you know cloud providers in you know few days and you know it's a lot of data so it takes you know some time to move but they were able to do that online completely online and and switch over you know to the diff to the other region which is failover is very important also so yes and no probably means typically no he says yes and no probably means no so it sounds like snowflake is selectively pulling small amounts of data and replicating it where necessary but you also heard him talk about the metadata layer which is one of the essential aspects of super cloud okay next we dug into security it's one of the most important issues and we think one of the hardest parts related to deploying super cloud so we've talked about how the cloud has become the first line of defense for the cso but now with multi-cloud you have multiple first lines of defense and that means multiple shared responsibility models and multiple tool sets from different cloud providers and an expanded threat surface so listen to benoit's explanation here please play the clip this is a great question uh security has always been the most important aspect of snowflake since day one right this is the question that every customer of ours has you know how you can you guarantee the security of my data and so we secure data really tightly in region we have several layers of security it starts by by encrypting it every data at rest and that's very important a lot of customers are not doing that right you hear these attacks for example on on cloud you know where someone left you know their buckets uh uh open and then you know you can access the data because it's a non-encrypted uh so we are encrypting everything at rest we are encrypting everything in transit so a region is very secure now you know you never from one region you never access data from another region in snowflake that's why also we replicate data now the replication of that data across region or the metadata for that matter is is really highly secure so snow grits ensure that everything is encrypted everything is you know we have multiple you know encryption keys and it's you know stored in hardware you know secure modules so we we we built you know snow grids such that it's secure and it allows very secure movement of data so when we heard this explanation we immediately went to the lowest common denominator question meaning when you think about how aws for instance deals with data in motion or data and rest it might be different from how another cloud provider deals with it so how does aws uh uh uh differences for example in the aws maturity model for various you know cloud capabilities you know let's say they've got a faster nitro or graviton does it do do you have to how does snowflake deal with that do they have to slow everything else down like imagine a caravan cruising you know across the desert so you know every truck can keep up let's listen it's a great question i mean of course our software is abstracting you know all the cloud providers you know infrastructure so that when you run in one region let's say aws or azure it doesn't make any difference as far as the applications are concerned and and this abstraction of course is a lot of work i mean really really a lot of work because it needs to be secure it needs to be performance and you know every cloud and it has you know to expose apis which are uniform and and you know cloud providers even though they have potentially the same concept let's say blob storage apis are completely different the way you know these systems are secure it's completely different the errors that you can get and and the retry you know mechanism is very different from one cloud to the other performance is also different we discovered that when we were starting to port our software and and and you know we had to completely rethink how to leverage blob storage in that cloud versus that cloud because just of performance too so we had you know for example to you know stripe data so all this work is work that's you know you don't need as an application because our vision really is that applications which are running in our data cloud can you know be abstracted of all this difference and and we provide all the services all the workload that this application need whether it's transactional access to data analytical access to data you know managing you know logs managing you know metrics all of these is abstracted too such that they are not you know tied to one you know particular service of one cloud and and distributing this application across you know many regions many cloud is very seamless so from that answer we know that snowflake takes care of everything but we really don't understand the performance implications in you know in that specific case but we feel pretty certain that the promises that snowflake makes around governance and security within their data sharing construct construct will be kept now another criterion that we've proposed for super cloud is a super pass layer to create a common developer experience and an enabler for ecosystem partners to monetize please play the clip let's listen we build it you know a custom build because because as you said you know what exists in one cloud might not exist in another cloud provider right so so we have to build you know on this all these this components that modern application mode and that application need and and and and that you know goes to machine learning as i say transactional uh analytical system and the entire thing so such that they can run in isolation basically and the objective is the developer experience will be identical across those clouds yes right the developers doesn't need to worry about cloud provider and actually our system we have we didn't talk about it but the marketplace that we have which allows actually to deliver we're getting there yeah okay now we're not going to go deep into ecosystem today we've talked about snowflakes strengths in this regard but snowflake they pretty much ticked all the boxes on our super cloud attributes and definition we asked benoit dejaville to confirm that this is all shipping and available today and he also gave us a glimpse of the future play the clip and we are still developing it you know the transactional you know unistore as we call it was announced in last summit so so they are still you know working properly but but but that's the vision right and and and that's important because we talk about the infrastructure right you mentioned a lot about storage and compute but it's not only that right when you think about application they need to use the transactional database they need to use an analytical system they need to use you know machine learning so you need to provide also all these services which are consistent across all the cloud providers so you can hear deja ville talking about expanding beyond taking advantage of the core infrastructure storage and networking et cetera and bringing intelligence to the data through machine learning and ai so of course there's more to come and there better be at this company's valuation despite the recent sharp pullback in a tightening fed environment okay so i know it's cliche but everyone's comparing snowflakes and data bricks databricks has been pretty vocal about its open source posture compared to snowflakes and it just so happens that we had aligotsy on at super cloud 22 as well he wasn't in studio he had to do remote because i guess he's presenting at an investor conference this week so we had to bring him in remotely now i didn't get to do this interview john furrier did but i listened to it and captured this clip about how data bricks sees super cloud and the importance of open source take a listen to goatzee yeah i mean let me start by saying we just we're big fans of open source we think that open source is a force in software that's going to continue for you know decades hundreds of years and it's going to slowly replace all proprietary code in its way we saw that you know it could do that with the most advanced technology windows you know proprietary operating system very complicated got replaced with linux so open source can pretty much do anything and what we're seeing with the data lake house is that slowly the open source community is building a replacement for the proprietary data warehouse you know data lake machine learning real-time stack in open source and we're excited to be part of it for us delta lake is a very important project that really helps you standardize how you lay out your data in the cloud and with it comes a really important protocol called delta sharing that enables you in an open way actually for the first time ever share large data sets between organizations but it uses an open protocol so the great thing about that is you don't need to be a database customer you don't even like databricks you just need to use this open source project and you can now securely share data sets between organizations across clouds and it actually does so really efficiently just one copy of the data so you don't have to copy it if you're within the same cloud so the implication of ellie gotzi's comments is that databricks with delta sharing as john implied is playing a long game now i don't know if enough about the databricks architecture to comment in detail i got to do more research there so i reached out to my two analyst friends tony bear and sanji mohan to see what they thought because they cover these companies pretty closely here's what tony bear said quote i've viewed the divergent lake house strategies of data bricks and snowflake in the context of their roots prior to delta lake databrick's prime focus was the compute not the storage layer and more specifically they were a compute engine not a database snowflake approached from the opposite end of the pool as they originally fit the mold of the classic database company rather than a specific compute engine per se the lake house pushes both companies outside of their original comfort zones data bricks to storage snowflake to compute engine so it makes perfect sense for databricks to embrace the open source narrative at the storage layer and for snowflake to continue its walled garden approach but in the long run their strategies are already overlapping databricks is not a 100 open source company its practitioner experience has always been proprietary and now so is its sql query engine likewise snowflake has had to open up with the support of iceberg for open data lake format the question really becomes how serious snowflake will be in making iceberg a first-class citizen in its environment that is not necessarily officially branding a lake house but effectively is and likewise can databricks deliver the service levels associated with walled gardens through a more brute force approach that relies heavily on the query engine at the end of the day those are the key requirements that will matter to data bricks and snowflake customers end quote that was some deep thought by by tony thank you for that sanjay mohan added the following quote open source is a slippery slope people buy mobile phones based on open source android but it's not fully open similarly databricks delta lake was not originally fully open source and even today its photon execution engine is not we are always going to live in a hybrid world snowflake and databricks will support whatever model works best for them and their customers the big question is do customers care as deeply about which vendor has a higher degree of openness as we technology people do i believe customers evaluation criteria is far more nuanced than just to decipher each vendor's open source claims end quote okay so i had to ask dodgeville about their so-called wall garden approach and what their strategy is with apache iceberg here's what he said iceberg is is very important so just to to give some context iceberg is an open you know table format right which was you know first you know developed by netflix and netflix you know put it open source in the apache community so we embrace that's that open source standard because because it's widely used by by many um many you know companies and also many companies have you know really invested a lot of effort in building you know big data hadoop solution or data like solution and they want to use snowflake and they couldn't really use snowflake because all their data were in open you know formats so we are embracing icebergs to help these companies move through the cloud but why we have been relentless with direct access to data direct access to data is a little bit of a problem for us and and the reason is when you direct access to data now you have direct access to storage now you have to understand for example the specificity of one cloud versus the other so as soon as you start to have direct access to data you lose your you know your cloud diagnostic layer you don't access data with api when you have direct access to data it's very hard to secure data because you need to grant access direct access to tools which are not you know protected and you see a lot of you know hacking of of data you know because of that so so that was not you know direct access to data is not serving well our customers and that's why we have been relented to do that because it's it's cr it's it's not cloud diagnostic it's it's you you have to code that you have to you you you need a lot of intelligence while apis access so we want open apis that's that's i guess the way we embrace you know openness is is by open api versus you know you access directly data here's my take snowflake is hedging its bets because enough people care about open source that they have to have some open data format options and it's good optics and you heard benoit deja ville talk about the risks of directly accessing the data and the complexities it brings now is that maybe a little fud against databricks maybe but same can be said for ollie's comments maybe flooding the proprietaryness of snowflake but as both analysts pointed out open is a spectrum hey i remember unix used to equal open systems okay let's end with some etr spending data and why not compare snowflake and data bricks spending profiles this is an xy graph with net score or spending momentum on the y-axis and pervasiveness or overlap in the data set on the x-axis this is data from the january survey when snowflake was holding above 80 percent net score off the charts databricks was also very strong in the upper 60s now let's fast forward to this next chart and show you the july etr survey data and you can see snowflake has come back down to earth now remember anything above 40 net score is highly elevated so both companies are doing well but snowflake is well off its highs and data bricks has come down somewhat as well databricks is inching to the right snowflake rocketed to the right post its ipo and as we know databricks wasn't able to get to ipo during the covet bubble ali gotzi is at the morgan stanley ceo conference this week they got plenty of cash to withstand a long-term recession i'm told and they've started the message that they're a billion dollars in annualized revenue i'm not sure exactly what that means i've seen some numbers on their gross margins i'm not sure what that means i've seen some numbers on their net retention revenue or net revenue retention again i'll reserve judgment until we see an s1 but it's clear both of these companies have momentum and they're out competing in the market well as always be the ultimate arbiter different philosophies perhaps is it like democrats and republicans well it could be but they're both going after a solving data problem both companies are trying to help customers get more value out of their data and both companies are highly valued so they have to perform for their investors to paraphrase ralph nader the similarities may be greater than the differences okay that's it for today thanks to the team from palo alto for this awesome super cloud studio build alex myerson and ken shiffman are on production in the palo alto studios today kristin martin and sheryl knight get the word out to our community rob hoff is our editor-in-chief over at siliconangle thanks to all please check out etr.ai for all the survey data remember these episodes are all available as podcasts wherever you listen just search breaking analysis podcasts i publish each week on wikibon.com and siliconangle.com and you can email me at david.vellante at siliconangle.com or dm me at devellante or comment on my linkedin posts and please as i say etr has got some of the best survey data in the business we track it every quarter and really excited to be partners with them this is dave vellante for the cube insights powered by etr thanks for watching and we'll see you next time on breaking analysis [Music] you
SUMMARY :
and and the retry you know mechanism is
SENTIMENT ANALYSIS :
ENTITIES
Entity | Category | Confidence |
---|---|---|
netflix | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
john furrier | PERSON | 0.99+ |
palo alto | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
tony bear | PERSON | 0.99+ |
boston | LOCATION | 0.99+ |
sanji mohan | PERSON | 0.99+ |
ken shiffman | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
today | DATE | 0.99+ |
ellie gotzi | PERSON | 0.99+ |
VMware | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
Snowflake | ORGANIZATION | 0.99+ |
siliconangle.com | OTHER | 0.99+ |
more than four petabytes | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first point | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
kristin martin | PERSON | 0.99+ |
both companies | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
first question | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
rob hoff | PERSON | 0.99+ |
more than one | QUANTITY | 0.99+ |
second model | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
alex myerson | PERSON | 0.98+ |
third model | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one region | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one copy | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
one region | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
five essential elements | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
android | TITLE | 0.98+ |
100 | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first line | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
Databricks | ORGANIZATION | 0.98+ |
sheryl | PERSON | 0.98+ |
more than one cloud | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
first | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
iphone | COMMERCIAL_ITEM | 0.98+ |
super cloud 22 | EVENT | 0.98+ |
each cloud | QUANTITY | 0.98+ |
each | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
sanjay mohan | PERSON | 0.97+ |
john | PERSON | 0.97+ |
republicans | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
this week | DATE | 0.97+ |
hundreds of years | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
siliconangle | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
each week | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
data lake house | ORGANIZATION | 0.97+ |
one single region | QUANTITY | 0.97+ |
january | DATE | 0.97+ |
dave vellante | PERSON | 0.96+ |
each region | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
one | QUANTITY | 0.96+ |
dave vellante | PERSON | 0.96+ |
tony | PERSON | 0.96+ |
above 80 percent | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
more than one cloud | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
more than one cloud | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
data lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
five essential properties | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
democrats | ORGANIZATION | 0.95+ |
first time | QUANTITY | 0.95+ |
july | DATE | 0.94+ |
linux | TITLE | 0.94+ |
etr | ORGANIZATION | 0.94+ |
devellante | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
dodgeville | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
each vendor | QUANTITY | 0.93+ |
super cloud 22 | ORGANIZATION | 0.93+ |
delta lake | ORGANIZATION | 0.92+ |
three deployment models | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
first lines | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |
dejaville | LOCATION | 0.92+ |
day one | QUANTITY | 0.92+ |